The Sun.
London, England, 1845-02-12 00:00:00

RAILWAYS FOR THE ACCOUNT, FEB 15,

St. Germain • .
Versailles, R.B.
L. 8.•• •••••••• •• 410 .. 410 .. 400 .. 410
Rouen •• ........ •• •• •• •• ••1112 50 1112 50 1108 75 1110
Rouen to Havre............ 957 50 .. 000 895 8 .7 5n
Orleans ......... ••••-• • • • • 1157 50 1160 1157 50 1158 75
Strasburg to 317 57) 317 50 • 31G 25 317 5o
Avignon to Marseilles...—. 947 50 .. 950 945 . 948 75
THIS

N

PRIVY COUNCIL.-(THIS DAY.)
The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council sat to-day in the
Council Chamber, Wnitehall. The Lords present were Lord
Wharncliffe (the Lord President), Lord Brougham, the Chancellor
of the Duchy of Cornwall, and the Judge of the Admiralty Court.

SHIRE S. SARRETT.

This case came before their Lordships upon an appeal from the
Supreme Court of the Mauritius. Upon this case being called on,
an objection was taken to the right of the parties to appeal, and
their Lordships, holding the objection to be valid, dismissed the
appeal.

COUNTER V. DIACMIERSON.
This appeal from the Courts in Canada occupied their Lordships
the remainder of theday.
Mr. Bethell and Mr. Kindersley were conmel in the case.

CHANCEY.-('PHIS DAY.)
The Lord Chancellor sat in Lincoln's Inn-hall today shortly
Alter 10 o'clock, and proceeded with the hearing of appeals.

SAI)MAREZ V. !IMMURE&
The arguments in this appeal occupied the Court the whole
morning.

VICE-CHANCERY.--(THIS DAY.)
(Before the VICE-CHANCELLOR of ENGLAND.)
PEARSE P. BROOKS.
The further arguments in these part-heard cases occupied the
Court the whole day.

QUEEN'S BENCH.-(T-iIS DAY.)
(Sittings in Banco after Term.)
TEE QUEEN v. THE COMMISSIONERS OF EICISE—JUDGMENT.
Lord DENMAN pronounced the judgment of the Court in this
case. This was an application for a writ of mandamus to compel
the defendants to grant a permit for the removal out of bond of two
casks of spirits which had been imported from Jersey. It ap-
peared that the spirits had been regularly imported, but when they
came in it was urged, on the part of the defendants, that they were
subject to all the Excise regulations to which spirits manufactured
in England were subject. Amongst other things it was necessary
that a request note should be delivered, and it was clear
that in this case no sufficient request-note had been delivered ; but
for the applicant it was contended that this was not necessary.
That question depended on the 52d section of the 4th and sth of
William IV., and upon looking at that Act the Court were of
opinion, that though the applicant had taken all the steps enume-
rated in that section, yet, because there were other steps to be
taken which were omitted by the applicant, and because he refused
a proper request.nete, they thought that the rule must be
discharged.

THE BARON DE BODE V. THE QUEEN.
The arguments in this case were renewed this morning by Mr.
Young, who addressed the Court on behalf of the suppliant.

BAIL COURT.-( i HIS DAY.)
(Sittings at Nisi Prius before a Special JulE
TVE QUEEN V OOMPERTZ.
This ease has been left over till the Easter term.
The jury who were in attendance complained of the intolerable
hardship of being called upon some five times, and hoped that
definite arrangements would be come to to prevent such a thing
in future.