The Sun.
London, England, 1844-04-08 00:00:00

fiICHAVEPPE'S SODA AND POTASS
WATERS, and ERATED LEMONADE,
he continued preference of the public for the above celebrated
preparations (notwithstanding the low price at which imitations are
frequently vended), so abundantly proves their superior quality, that
it only. remains for the manufacturers to express their acknowledg—
ments, and to caution consumers against an imposition often prac-
tised 'ay unprincipled persons filling Schweppes bottles with a spu.
rious composition, and passing it off as Same ppe's manufacture.
None is genuine without a label representing the name of their firm.
SCH WEPPE'S LIQUID MAGNESIA, for the cure of sea sick.
mess, gout, acidity, &c., is an invaluable medicine, scientifically made
with the aid of their powerful machinery, and patronised universally
by the medical prOfession;
Sold, together with the above, by most respectable Chemists in
the United Kingdom; 51, Remora-street , London; and at their
Branch Manufactories at Liverpool, Bristol, and. Derby.

MECHrS SUPERB TEA-TRAYS, in papier
.
mache, Manufactori 4 Leadenh all-street, London, are .
un-
rivalled specimens of lapanneitf work, infinitely surpassing the
Chinese. The prices, vary from a very low figure up to 20 guineas
the set. They comprise some brilliant specimens of art in figures,
landscapes, flowers, and birds, with buhl and gold. The same manu-
facture is applied in work-boxes, dressing.cases, envelope cases,
netting boxes, glove boxes, playing-card boxes, and ladies' visiting-
card cases ; hand screens, pole screens, card rack, inkstands, adies'
work tables, chess tables, portfolios, note and cake baskets, Ifhe foregoing are all in papier mache, and
desks, letter boxes, &e.,
very cheap, say from pc up to 201 ; and Mechi can confidently
assert that his establishment, for these articles, surpasses in price,
quality, and extent of stock, any similar concern in the United King-
dom. Weill is sole inventor of the Mechian dressing.cases, the
patent castellated tooth-brushes,
9d. each, the cushioned bagatelle
tables, the magic razor-strop, and peculiar steel razor. A visit to
his establishment will gratify those who are desirous of seeing the
most perfect manufactures of this country displayed in the most
attractive form,

ASSIZE INTELLIGENCE.
NORTHERN CIRCUIT.---Liverpool, April 4.
(Before Mr. Baron ROLFE.)
THE LAST WRIT OF BIGHT—RUSHTON, DEMANDANT, V.
NESBIT, TENANT.
This was a writ of right to try the title to a very con-
siderable property, situate in Chorltoneupon-Medlock.
The writ of right was an ancient remedy for the reco-
very of lands in fee simple, when .by length of time
or other circumstances, the claimant was shut out from
asserting his right in the action more usually adopted
for that purpose. Evidence having been adduced,
Mr. DUNDAS stated that his Learned Friend (Mr.
Archbold) and himself had carefully watched the case
throughout, and that he must admit he was not able to
answer the evidence on the other side, or to impugn with
effeat the title the tenant had set up.
A verdict was returned accordingly.
Friday, April 5.
(Before Mr. Baron ROLFE.)
ALDERSON V. WAISTEEL AND OTHERS.

This was an action to recover damages for assault.
The plaintiff and the defendants in this case are far-
mers, residing at Birkdale, in Yorkshire, and are of re-
spectable standing in their calling. The plaintiff and
one of the defendants are severally possessed of certain
land at Birkdale, and entitled to common pasture on
certain wastes there situate. The sheep of each person
were tended in a particular part of the common, which
was called the " heaf " of that party ; and after being
kept in the heaf for some time the sheep were,
with little difficulty, induced to remain within the pre-
scribed limits. The plaintiff had two bields, or stone in-
closures, Co shelter the sheep in rough weather, on the
common, as well as the defendant ; but the latter took
it into his hend that besides his own, he would take
possession of one, of ' the plaintiff's Melds. On Sun-
day, the 4th of February, the nephew of the plain •
tiff was at the bield, tending his uncle's sheep,
when the elder defendant came up to him, and
said he would have one of the plaintiff's bields.
The plaintiff might retain which he liked, but he (the
defendant) would have the other. On the following day
the plaintiff and his nephew were at the bield, when the
elder defendant came up on horseback, using very violent
language towards the plaintiff. , His son, another of the
defendants, was crossing the common with some sheep,
and both proceeded to drive the sheep towards the bield
of the plaintiff. The plaintiff and his nephew drove their
flockiso as to be interposed between the bield and the
sheep of the defendants, and the two flocks becoming
mixed together, a contest arose between the parties, the
plaintiff and his nephew trying to keep the defendants'
sheep back; the defendants urging them forward. The
elder defendant at last struck the plaintiff a severe blow
with a stick, which knocked him down; The plaintiff
did not return the blow, but g, still endeavoured to
make the sheep turn back. The defendant then snatched
a larger stick from the hand of his son, struck the
plaintiff another severe blow on the head, knocking
him down a second time, and then seizing him by the
heels dragged him over the. stony ground, and flung
him into a ditch at some distance. The younger defen-
dant also threw a stick at the plaintiff and struck him.
This was the assault complained of.

Mr. DUNDAS addressed the jury for the defence, con-
tending that the nature of the assault had been much
exaggerated, and-that the defendant had done no more
than was necessary to remove the obstruction which the
plaintiff offered to his driving, as he had a right todo, his
own sheep off the common.
A verdict was finally returned for the plaintiff—
Damages 10/. A4.,t0 the younger defendant a verdict of
not guilty was returned.
Saturday, Apri G. •

THE • QUEEN AGAINST 'WILLIAM, BROCELEHURST, AND

BEESTON.

This was an indictment for a conspiracy to defraud
her Majesty of certain duties of the Customs.
Mr. Starkie, Mr. Wortley, and Mr. Cardwell, were for
the prosecution. The prisoner Williams was defended
by Mr. Bamshay, Brocklehurst by Mr. Sergeant Murphy,
and Beeston by Mr. James.
The principal witness against the defendants was a
person of the name of Booth, a locker in the Customs,
who stated that on the 17th of July last, while he was
standing under the dome of the Custom-house; Beeston,
who is a landing-waiter, came up to him and said he
wanted to speak to Aim. They went together to a public-