The Sun.
London, England, 1845-04-29 00:00:00

TRADE.

Sir G. CLERK stated that the documents which had
been laid before the Rai%ay Committee of the Board ol
Trade were now deposited in the clerks' office of the House.
Ile thought that the best way by which they could he
rendered acceptable to all the parties interested would
be by referring the several documents to the R►ailw•ay
Committee upon the different Bills to which the docu-
ments related. He should, therefore, move that the
documents be now so referred.

Mr. HASTIE presented seven petitions against the
grant to Maynooth.
Colonel ACTON presented several petitions to the
same effect, from Wicklow.
Several petitions were presented against the proposed
Maynooth grant.
Lord, BERNARD presented several petitions from
places in Cork against the increased grant to Maynooth.
Sir J. HAN MER presented a petition from Beverley
in Yorkshire against the grant.
Mr. S. GRAWFORD presented petitions from various
places in England to the same effect.
Mr. HINDLEY presented 30 petitiors against the
Maynooth grant from the following places :—The inha-
bitants of Damerham and Martin, 'Wilts; Chatteris,
Cambridgeshire ; Shaffington, Bucks ; Spettisbary,
Dorset ; Sturminster Marshall, Dorset ; Heul-
lan, Denbigh ; Palharn and Waxham, Nor-
folk ; Protestant Dissenters, Node Chapel, Isle of
Wight ; Foulmire, Cambridgeshire ; Park-street
Chapel, Cotteris, Isle of Ely; Blackwood, Monmouth-
shire ; Trefyam, Pembrokeshire ; Canzard, Cornwall ;
Newton Chapel, Staidburn, Yorkshire ; Ministers meet-
ing at Alton, Hants ; Oatwood, Surrey ; Calvinistic
Methodists, Northampton Chapel, Cleikenwell ; Bap-
tists, Chatteris, Cambridgeshire ; Uckfield, Sussex ;
Aberdare, Glamorganshire ; Wesleyan Methodist
Association, Stockton-on-Tees • Norley Tabernacle,
South Lincolnshire; Appleby, Westmoreland ; Lynn,
Norfolk; Besde, Cornwall • Holmes Chapel Cheshire ;
United Association, Avon-bridge, Stirlingshire.
Sir R. INGLIS presented a petition from a parish in
the county of Ayr against the Government measure
with respect to Maynooth. It stated that endowing the
Roman Catholic priesthood would be to support idols-
tors, and to render them partakers in the sin of idolatry.
—(Laughter.) He also presented petitions from several
parishes in the counties of Suffolk, Perth, Down, ard
Stafford, to the same effect.
WINIVICK RECTORY BILL.

Sir R. INGLIS, on the report on this Bill being pre-
sented, took occasion to eulogise the conduct of the
Rector of Winwick, who, he stated, endowed seven
parishes out of his rectorial income.---The report was
received.

COLONIAL BISHOPS.
Mr. COLLETT put a question relative to the pay-
ment of Colonial Bishops, which was not audible.
Mr. HOPE, in reply, said it was true Bishops had
been appointed at Colombo and at New Brunswick, but
neeither were paid for by the people of this country.
Theßishop of Colombo was paid for by the colony itself,
the Bishop of New Brunswick by a fund raised in this
country for the endowment of colonial bishops.
Captain BERKELEY nished to know whether it was
true that the Commander-in-Chief had ordered the
officers of the two regiments of Life Guards, to provide
for the payment of bands as in the line, and if so to lay
the ccpy of such orders on the table of that House.
Mr. SIDNEY. HERBERT said it was quite true that
such an order had been issued. He would ascertain
whether it could be laid on the table of the House, but
at present did not think it was a matter in which Parlia-
ment should interfere.—(Hear, hear.)
Mr. WAKLEY asked Sir James Graham if he would
consent to a motion for a return of a copy of the answer
addressed to the Committee of the National Association
of General Practitioners by the Council of the Royal
College of Surgeons.
Sir J. GRAHAM said that in a day or two he would
lay on the table of the House the correspondence to
which the Hon. Member referred.