The Sun.
London, England, 1844-02-03 00:00:00

address of the lion. Mon'ier for Dungarven, (Mr. Shell), to
the Court, which could tend to have roused the feelings of 1
the Attorney.Gcnoral for Ireland. l on. Gentlemen in this
House were all willing to make ample allowances for such
ebullitii.ns of feelings, but this House was not like a Court
of Justice. If ever there was a time VOICTI everything like
personal feeling should be avoided it was in this ease. He
agreed with the lion. Member for Cork that from the very
beginning of those trials there was a most unfortunate irrita-
bility shown by the Attorney-General, which he was sure
the Government would be the first to admit. If he ex-
pressed his regret, no gentleman would wish to carry the
matter further ; still that would prove that a high legal func.
tionary was deficient in that temper which was necessary to the
dignified discharge of his duties. only vindication which had
been offered on his behalf was that many expressions had been
used which were likely to excite a man of an irritable temper,
but he denied that there was anything in the speeches of the
Right Hon. Member for Dungarvon, or Mr. Fitzgibbon, be-
yond what the interests of their clients called for.
Mr. WYSE cxplaindd.
Mr. SHAW, as an old and intimate friend of the Attorney-
General for Ireland, wished to bear testimony to his high
standing in his profession, and his many estimable private qua-
, lilies. At the same time, he did not at all mean to vindicate
the conduct of the Attorney-General. Still he would say
that he thought it an unjust, ungenerous, and unjustifirble
attack which had been made by the Hon. Member for Bath
upon a man of his own profession. Ile (Mr. Shaw) thought
Mr. Roebuck was not exactly the man best suited for bring-
ing such an accusation as this—(Hear, hear)—for he thought
him one of the most unfit persons to stand up and deliver a
lecture upon this subject. But what he complained of most
was, that this attack had been made on account of the parti-
cular act of having sent a challenge, but that the Hon. Mem-
ber had made a general and indiscriminate attack upon the
Attorney-General. lie (Mr. Shaw) knew the Attorney-
General well, and he could fearlessly appeal to every Member in
the profession as to whether the insinuation of the Hon. Mem-
ber ior Bath, that he was unfit for the pi ee he holds, was worth
anything. Ile asked the Hon. and Learned Member for
Cashel whether all pan ties did riot agree that the Attorney-
General was an honour to Iti. !profession, and that he had al-
ways conducted himself in 'way most creditable to himself?
He was placed in pert ha eircumstances. He (Mr. Shaw) was
sorry to refer to the trial new pending in Ireland, but allusion
had been made to the Attorney-General's requiring Mr. J.
O'Connell's attendance n Court when he only went into the
library. Now, what •Fi aae fact? Why, that Mr. O'Connell
nad gone to that very ascociation which the indictment, under
which he was being tried, had declared to be illegal, and his in.
. .

tention to do so sad been publicly advertised in the newspapers
(Cheers from the Tory benches.) His attendance was not
required as a criminal, but he was allowed to wear his ow ndress,
and sit amongst the Counsel. Therefore this was a gross mis-
representation. He (Mr. Shaw) heard men of all political
parties in Ireland agree that under the circumstances of this
trial, the Attorney-General's conduct had reflected the greatest
credit on him.—(Loud laughter and ironical cheers.) He
believed that it was the object of many newspapers, and of al-
most all his opponents, to make a set against the Hon. and
Learned Gentleman, in order that he might be unfitted for the
performance of his duties. He expressed those opinions not as
a partisan ; he had never spoken to the Attorney-General on
the subject, nor had he ever expressed an opinion on the mat-
ter until the present ; but now he felt bound to bear testi-
mony to the general endeavour of the Attorney-General to
discharge his arduous duties not only with propriety but in
good temper.—( Loud laughter.) The matter alluded to by
the lion. Member for Bath, occurred during a temporary ab-
sence of the Judges, and the moment the Court was informed
of the matter, it pronounced the strongest condemnation. The
matter there terminated, and ought not to have been revived.
Dr. STOCK said, as his Right Honourable and Learned
Friend had put a question to him in such a direct manner, he
should say that he thought the Attorney-General had displayed
More temper than either his friends or enemies expected. No
public officer was ever called on to discharge duties of such
'importance, and which required the most decided exercise of
judgment and temper—( Hear, hear)—and he - stated his per-
feet belief that there were not wanting inducements on the
other side to bring to a test the infirmity of his temper.—
(Ministerial cheers.) He repeated that the Attorney-General,
taking all the circumstances of his position into consideration,
had acted with-much more temper than-could be expected from
him.—(Laughter.) He was in habits of personal intimacy
with the Attorney-General for Ireland ; he knew him Well,
and a better or more honourable man, or one who better dis-
charged all the relations of private life, never lived.—(Hear.)
He was an honour to his profession—he possessed great legal
acuteness—and he was entitled to and enjoyed the deference
and respect of his profession and of the countrefeee-(Chenate)
He knew him to be of the must unexceptionable character ;
but his appointment to the situation he held was most unfortu-
nate, because there were persons at the bar who were more fit
to carry out the objects of the present Government than Mr.
Smith. He had, as all men had, his defects, but a more
excellent lawyer did not exist.—(Cheers. )
Lord INGESTRIE said it would be most ungenerous in
him if he did nut get up and state that, during the time he
was present in the Court of Queen's tench, in Ireland, no
person could have conducted himself with greater propriety
than the Attorney-General did there. He would, further, call
the attention of the House to the fact that attacks were made
upon him. Even Mr. O'Connell himself, in the Association,
attributed personal motives to him, for he said—" No verdict,
no Chief Justiceship." As far as he saw, the Attorney-
General conducted himself with great mildness, and a quiet
demeanour, and no person in a similar situation could behave
with greater moderation than the Attorney-General did for
the few days he (Lord Ingustrie) had been in Dublin.
Mr. WALLACE said that the Attorney-General for Ireland
had great cause to say " save me from my frieeds." From
the Right Hon. Baronet downwards, one and all concurred
in giving him the character of one most unfit to fill his present
situation. The House recollected the mode in which he con.
ducted himself with regard to the Arms Bill. The Attorney-
General for England had to de the work of the Attorney-Ge-
neral for Ireland. The expressions used by his Hon. and
Learned Friend below him were but the truth, and he de-
served great praise for dealing with the Attorney-General for
Ireland as he did, especially as he knew that the members of
the profession were not fond of attacking each other.—
(Laughter.) The Attorney-General was guilty of an open
breach of the law, and when the Government said they
ought not to interfere and dismiss him, he begged
to remind them of the conduct pursued towards the
Liberal magistrates of Ireland who attended repeal meetings,
and they dismissed those magistrates without any sort of
ceremony ; but they hail nothing to do with three-cornered
notes. It was undeniable that the Attorney-General pos-
sessed an irritability of temper which unfitted him for his
situation. His character as a lawyer, or as a gentleman, was
equally indifferent to him, but he maintained that a worse
selection conld not be made than that of the Attorney-General
fur Ireland to fill hs situation. With regard to what e as said
on the impropriety of alluding to what was going on in Ire-
land, he could not understand why those three paragraphs re-
lating to that country were inserted, if it was not intended to
muzzle therm—( Heer, hear, and laughter.) It muzzled the
Noble Lord, but it would not muzzle others, and he was glad
they had an opportunity of ttiscussing the subject. Ile would
support the motion of the Hon. Member for Rochdale.
Mr. BROTHERTON had listened with attention to the
present discussion, and he regretted that no person denounced
the practice of duelling generally. He was not disposed to
reflect on the condact of the Attorney-General, and perhaps
it were better to wait till lie was present himself.—(Hear. )
He thought the practice of duelling ought to be denounced by
that House. How could they expect the people could be reli-
gious when a practice so repugnant to the ordir.ancee of religion,
and so opposed to the law, was countenanced by some of the
highest in the land? It was nothing but murder.--( Hear,
hear.) The conduct of the Attorney-General was denounced;
but let those who were without stain themselves cast the first
stone. —( Hear, hear.) He hoped the present debate would
nut be without its use in putting an end to this practice.
CURTEIS said he did not think the Govtriment had
any right to complain of the subject of Ireland being introduced
into debate pending the present trials. He had heard it stated
by two lion. Members for Ireland (one of whom was remark-
able fur his moderation), that it was their firm conviction the
address, as it now stood, wasted influence the verdict of the jury.
He wished to see a fair and impartial verdict, and he would
therefore wish to see all that related to Ireland expunged
from it. This was the ground on which lie would give his
vote in favour of the amendment. He regretted that the leader
of the Opposition had not moved an amendment to the address
which would unite their strength, instead of having it frit-
tered away in two divisions last night, in which he was obliged
to vote against those with whom he usually acted. The At-
I torney- General for Ireland had it ceived a severe castigation
from the House, but he did not think he ought to be dismissed
from his office.
Sir W. BARRON said he could not avoid alluding to an
expression which had fallen from the Noble Lord the Secretary
for Irtearid. He said that the Attorney-General for Ireland
had conducted himself with temper and moderation during this
unfortunate prosecution, for such it was. He knew the Noble
Lord would not state anything which he did not believe to be
the fact, but he had been grossly misinformed on the subject.
Having attentively observed the progress of the trial, he must
say he never in the course of his experience read or heard of
such a gross instance of want of temper, such insulting lan-
guage, and such uncalled-for observations, as were made by the
Attorney-General during the trials, from their commencement
to their present stage, and he wished a Committee of the
house were appointed to inquire into the fact. He
was certain there never was such a gross want of
temper, discretion, and judgment di.played as during the
whole of these transactions. Let him call to mind what
occurred at an early stage of the prosecutions. Three of the
solicitors employed by the traversers made a solemn affidavit
that it was necessary far the defence to have certain papers,
and to collect certain evidence, without which the defence
could not be conducted with fairness or justice to their clients.
The Attoroey-Ganeral, on his own mere ipse dirk, comes
down, arid tells the Court that the affidavits of these three re-
spectable gentlemen were made solely for the purposes of delay.
Such a course of conduct as this, so unjust, so unbecoming, and
so insulting, was never before known in that or in any other
Court ; and he was at last obliged, n the presence of the
Court, to retract this language, aed make an apology for it.
S H A W—Are you not speaking of some other person ?
Sir W. BARRON—Mr. Brewster.—( Cheers and laughter.)
They might have their cheer. lle was talking of the entire
conduct of this case—(Oh, oh.)—this was a part of the whole.
Arid he opening the case to the Gsurt the Learned Gentleman
used language which had never before been heard in a
court of justice, wit's regard to the traversers. He asserted
to the Court that, of,his own knowledge, he could prove a for_
midable conspiracy, thus aggravating the case in every position
that he took, and that, too, in language which would not be
tolerated in the Courts of ibis country, and which would never
be used by the Learned Attorney-General opposite, as well
l from a sense of propriety and decorum, as from the knowledge
that, by such conduct, he was only injuring his own case. But
not only in this I:nd the Attorney-General for Ireland greatly
committed himself, but he had removed every Roman Catholic
who was left on the jury list.—(Cries of "Oh, oh.") That
Learned Gentleman's conduct was before the House, and
he had a right to remark upon every part of it. He insulted
every !lonian Catholic in that country, by removing eleven
Homan Catholics as unfit to be on the jury, the only eleven
Roman Catholics that were upon the panel, and he left no one
upon it hut gentlemen notoriously opposed to the traversers in
politics. Was that justice? was that fairness? They tried
men upon a charge, a political charge, and they took care to
have upon the jury telly those wire were known to be adverse
to them on the very identical point upon which they
were charged. Why, if a Frenchman or a Bel-
gian, a Spaniard, a German, or a 'lurk, were put
upon their trial in this country they were allowed
to have six of their own countrymen upon the jury. lie be-
lieved that was the number—be was no lawyer—but he knew
every foreigner was entitled, at least, to have a portioa of
, foreigners on the jury. But here were their own countrymen
to be tried, and none were to be on the jury save those known
to be opposed to them—wain filled with prejudices against them,
and whose opinions and sentiments were known and recorded.
Was this fair play? He appealed to the English people if it
was right or fair to try a man by his enemies, and this in a
country where politics ran so high as unhappily they did in
Ireland. But would the verdict have any effect—would it carry
any weight ? he saint that let the verdict be what it might, the
moral effect of it would be destroyed, and they might thank
their Attorney-General for it. His conduct had caused more
alienation between the people of the two countries, had en-
gendered more animosity, than anything that had occurred
within the last fifty years. For all this mass of evil they had
to thank their Attorney- General. They might continue him
in his office, but ho told the Government that in doing so
they perpetuated an insult to his countryman, for he spike
from knowledge of his own, when he said that every Roman

Ca. holic in Ireland considered himself insulted by the mare
wh ch that Honourable and Learned Gentleman had persta
wild reference to thi:so trials. With regard to th
pa*',icular ques'i.n before the }lonise, he thought
wc,ld he better to leave out every wird which alluded to
re!

,al of the union. An allusion to it was not called for—,'
totally unnecessary, and could on'y have the effect of h-
as• ing the jury in Ireland. There were men in Ireland win
aso ,Id take the reference in the speech in a wrong sense, look-
ng upon it not as an expression of the House, but as that of
her Majesty herself. He thought it most unfortunate and un-
lair for the Government, under the present circumstances of
the trials, to have made any allusion at all to Ireland in the

speech, especially with the professions of the Right Hon. Bart.
that his only desire was to hald the scales of justice even-
handed. He should certainly vote fur the amendment.
Mr. HUME said the chief question for the House to con-
sider was whether the words of the speech would have the
effect of giving any bias to the proceedings which were now
going on in the Courts of Ireland. Two or three gentlemen
from Ireland declared such bias would be produced by the
words, whilst the Right Hon. Bart. and others on the
inisterial side denied this. If the words would
have such effect, it was for the Right Honourable
Baronet to say whether he would not leave them out--
(A laugh)—in order to prevent any injury that might arise
from their use. He was sorry ;to sue that so much personal
feeling had been mixed up with the discussion, and thought
that the Right Hon. Gentleman (Mr. Shaw) was hardly justi-
fied in making the attack which he had done on his Hon. and
Learned Friend beneath him (Mr. Roebuck), who had only
done his duty in bringing forward the matter, as he had done
so to deter others from doing that which certainly appeared
to be a direct interference with the due course of justice. Every
one had been speaking of the Attorney-General and his
amiable disposition and excellent character, but few said
anything of the facts of the case, or whether any injury would
accrue to the interests of justice, and the fair-play due to the
trarersers, which he (Mr. Hume) was afraid would be the
case. In this state of things, and fearing that, if the words
were allowed to remain, they would have this effect, he felt
himself bound to recend his vote in favour of the amendment.
Dr. BOWRING said he came with distress of mind to
something like a conviction that, if the union was to be sepa-
rated, it was to be by such executive measures as had bees
brought lately to bear upon Ireland. He would impress upon
the House to consider whether the anion was represented by
what was now going on in Ireland. Did they think, that in a
country where !wren-eighths of the people professed
a certain religion—that on a trial of vast importance to strike
every man of that religion of the jury was the way to main-
tain peace, or consolidate union ? If that was to be the law, tie
wonder the union was beginning to be intolerable. He quite
agreed with the remarks that had fallen from his How. Friend
' (Mr. Brotherton) on the subject of duelling. But when they
saw it countenanced in the most high and exalted places, in the
very seat and sanctuary of justice--(Hear, hear)—hew could
they hope to see it properly rebuked, or its abomisable practice
be pet down? Referring again to the union, he recollected
Mr. Ricardo many years ago stating that if that question was not
allowed to be quietly mooted, and freely discussed,
it would
force itself into a discussion with a violence that all would
regret. Fer his own part, he (Dr. Bowring) could not see
the crime that any person committed in discussing it. Seeing
that the address declared the integrity of the union—that the
question was foreclosed by it—that it bound Members to
opinions which hereafter they might see reasons to change—he
could not, conscientiously, vote for this particular portion of it,
' arid must, therefore, give his support to the amendment of his
Hon. Friend.
The House then divided, when there were—
For the address
For the amendment
1 Majority —lo7
On the re-admission of strangere to the gallery we ford!,
, Mr. F. ITRENGII complaining of the manner in whisli,tne
. Commission of Inquiry respecting landetenere heeleeßn°
stituted. It was an additional insult to :that`rii the
r appointment of that Commission liishmen had been el'eltiClid•
Sir ROBERT PEEL assured the House and -10e-,TICie•
- .gentleman that in the constitution of the 'COmmis;rori 'Sio
In-
sjelf Was intended to Ireland: The 'Noble' Lord wilt, was elle
pOinted to preside over the COMMIsii-On -hid been seleeteel be-
cause he "was' not 9nly a large proprietor of land iii f,relando
hut lid was 'intimately eequairitea with -theism's relatingip the
tenureasf,land n Eglandelle had ei in thanet;rys
_ _

and also had filled the office of Clerk to the House of Lords,
in which situation he had great opportunities of becoming ac-
quainted with the laws and usages relating to the tenure of laud
in England. The four gentlemen associated with hint
were also Irish proprietors, and they were gentlemen so well
known as to render it unnecessary for him (Sir R. Peel) to saY
one word in refutation of the assertion that their appointment
was an insult to Ireland.—(Cheers.)
Mr. S. CRAWFORD said that he had attended two days
before the Commission, and he was quite satisfied that they
had entered upon their inquiry with a sincere intention of
doing justice. It was his duty to rise for the purpose ",
thanking the Right lion. Baronet far the appointment of the
Commission.
Sir R. PEEL requested the House to suspend its judgment
on the question of the Commission. He desired no higher re•
futation of the charge that the appointments were an insult to
Ireland than that wich had been given by the Hon. Gentle..
, :man who bad just sat down.—(Loud cheers.)
Mr. F. FFRENCH denied that he had made any attack Os
the Earl of Devon.
Sir R. PEEL had not accused the Hon. Gentlemen of 11s
attack on the Earl of Devon, but of an attack upon himself
(Sir it. Peel) and the Government, which the Hon. Member
accused of inflicting an additional insult upon Ireland.
Mr. T. DUNCOMBE said that, for the convenience of the
House, he had postponed to this day his motion of an amend-
ment upon the address, which had fur its object the extension
of the franchise in Irish boroughs as well as in the counties.
He had intended to move an amendment to the effect that the
last paragraph but one should be altered with a view to the
extension of the franchise in Ireland, in boroughs, as well as to
counties. In the paragraph upon which he propene"
the amendment it was admitted by the Government
that the effect of the Registration Act was to re-
strict the franchise. The same effect had been acknowledged
in the boroughs. Mr. Smith O'Brien had shown in It4l that
from the year 1827, down to tkat year, that is to Pay, in four
years, the constituency of Ireland had been reduced from
109,000 to 80,000. He could not well understand what the
object was of giving, at this particular period, an extension to
the county constituency, whilst the constituency of the
boroughs wps left untouched. He would, therefore, persevere
in his motion.
Sir R. PEEL protested against any discussion of the repre-
sentation of Ireland, upon the consideration of the paragraph
in the Queen's speech, to which the Hon. Gestlomantl
amendment applied. The effect of the Registration Bill had
been to limit the constituency of the counties, and it was the
intention of the Government to submit to Parliament a lie"
sure for remedying that inconvenience. It was not, however.:
to be supposed that they excluded from their consideration any
other amelioration of the present law of franchise.
Mr. BARRON thought it was unnecessary to preps the
motion to a division, after hearing the Right Hon. Baronet st
the head of her Majesty's Government that it was not his in:
tention to limit the proposed amelioration to the coney voter"
alone.

After a few words from Mr. F. FFRENCH,
Mr. T. DUNCOMBE said that he did not this it 0.1,1
now necessary to press his amendment. After what he had ties
from the Right Hon. Baronet, he thought it would be In°
advisable to withdraw that amendment.—( Hear, hear.)
Sir It. PEEL said that if the report upon the address wer;
now carried, he should move that the House meet to-morrow,
two o'clock, for the purpose of going up with the address.
The address was then brought up and agreed to.
JOINT-STOCK BANKS.
Mr. BLEIVITT said, there was a paragraph in the addreboo
referring to the Bank Charter and Joint-Stock Banks t
wished to have more information of the course the Governules
intended to pursue in regard to those subjects.
Sir R. PEEL said, that her Majesty's Government would
not institute any inquiry into these matters, but they vi°ll,
themselves undertake the responsibility of all questions of
nected with the renewal of the Bank Charter and the state
Joint Stock, and other banking establishments. He could 1:21°,1
then say at what period of the session any such motion 0° 0
be made, but it would be made at such a period as would itou_id
the fullest consideration of it. The most ample notice As°"
be given when any measure would be brought forward. .00
Mr. BLEWIT r expressed his thanks for the informs"
given to him by the Right. Hon. Baronet.
THE IRISH CHURCH

Mr. WARD seeing the Noble Lord the Secretary for Ire;
land in his place, wished to put a question to him as to sow,
,
returns which were ordered last session, and which were "lr
then made out. There was then a difference between bur:p
h-
"
and the Noble Lord as to the amount of the revenue 0,
Irish Church. Might he ask the Noble Lord now, if the'" -be
turns were made nut. avid when they would be placed in
hands of Hon. Members?
•„ the
Lord ELIOT said all the information which woo
had power of the Ecclesiastial Commissioners to give ha° "-be
urepared, and should be furnished. But a great portion of ttbe .
revenue of the Church in Ireland did not pass through a 9
h rids of the Eccle,,iastieal Commissioners ; therefore the
not in their power to give any return of it. He adulate be,.
there was a difference last ses,ien between the Hon. An
and himself on this subject, and he was quite ready to gent:e.
ledge the accurateness of the calculation made by the *—
Gentleman.
METROPOLITAN IMPROVEMENTS; and
The Metropolitan Improvements Bill was br""d tim- ON
read a first time, and ordered to be read a 51" c"
Monday next.
The House then adjourned.

A. serious accident happened on Sunday mo.rifit—li
at the Paris ~:tation of the Orleans Railroad. The trxill
merchandise, having attached to it a waggon for pasoatout
which left Orleans on :-.'aturday night, on arriving at 4, ell-
nine o'clock at the terminus, got off the rails as it oa,— veil
tering the station. The waggon, which contained
oot
passengers, Iris overturned, and two of them were
instantaneously killed by the shock.

B.
On the 29th ult., at Dover IRTHS
the lady of Captain 3101
R.N., of a eon.
,• wont',
On the 29th ult., at Addington Rectory, near M4l
the Rev. George Paulson, of a daughter.

MARRIED. is"'
On the 2(1 inst., M. Ferdinand Ilaeault' of the Min ee
hter
Public Works at Brussels, to Catherine, second daug
the late B. Gilbert, Esq.

ED. 10
On the 3d of
_November,D 161
'43, at the ('ape of Good 1
biol''n,'
C)arles, third st,n of the Rev. Charles 11. Ilallett, of 114,
Kent. cid4
On the 13th ult., nt Venice, Lewes Garland, Es9lvilt:,
son of the. late I'. Garland, Esq. 2 of Sand id;._._j!L()4er
MONTHLY MILITARY OBITUARV'G., C,,1.
Lieutenant-Generals----Sir H. Lowe, K.C.13. G.G3I. wie;
of 50 ; Sir W. Johnston, K.C.13., Col. of GS F. ; "ni"
E. Coni). Serv. E
Major-Generals—George Wallah, E. 1. Co. Ser'
Johnston, C.ll. do.

Colonel—G. Miller C. B. unatt. o,,,,rais-
Lieutenant-Colonels—Drinkwater Bethune. 11. p•;-„," Art.
sariat3fa joDreLasrti.r;Rlolb..WAh.itue,otltiigtaiat,t; ;liCt C. 1132ridig, e;,llll,aterk°efi :'.28 F• ;
Bernard, late 5 11. Vet. Bn. ' . F.
.11111 c'
2K
iliii;birtisio.tefglll-hit'Clesnolr3l•l°--lugl ah\"-
Captains—De Havilland, 55 F.; flattray, 81 F. !„• '----,,„ 3teil,
h. n. Brunsw. Inf.; Ifeydenrich, hi. p. 4 Line Bn. Ger. Lob' _
b Lientenants--Venour, 18 F.; AlacLachlan, 28 F• ; di late
.), late of 11. Art.; Butcher, 3W. I. Reg. • T'PLeliain ' 34
1 Vet. 13n. ; 11. Mackay, h. p. 22 F ; is. SpLeod, it. Pi Jo
illet:
11,.
)4. oorp,.r.(G; ov. of tus, iir,
F• ; TaPPe, h. p. 1 Lt. Dr. Gtr. Leg.F.
Schroder, IL P. 1
13n. Ger. Leg. • Woltl; do. do. ' I : liati-
Ensigns—W'oodward, 40 F. • S 'tl 2 IV• j• Rev' '
; un 1, •
num, h. p. 60 F. i.. 12
Quartermasters—Houghton, h. p. 14 Dr. ; swift, ii.ip:
F.; otteY, h. p. 60 F. ; Bett, late of H. Art.; Shift,
°
Commissariat Department—Dep. Conlin. Gcn. Foote•Aoiot,
Medical Department ' Bk 1 11 Art. ...
t.
—Surgeon ee ,l• P• ' • e
well-
Sur,r ,cons--Tongue, 10 F. • Young, Stub, J WTI
Von SteiaiN
Sul;;.—Gross, h. p. 95 Dr. '
Barrack. master—StokeB, 1.......
--------------61-00,
Loudon: Printed and Publiated lq MUIIPO T A 7 in tb•
O. 112, Strand, at Mt Sun Office, Ne. 112, Stra,n4
County of ISl.lddleso .
•E; Saturday, February a, Is.“ ,
..... .1
..,..1
•
, . .
. . .
...,,...! 4.,•:-. ...t.. ~.-1..; ;..0......• .""i'.