The Sun.
London, England, 1844-06-12 00:00:00

THE SUN, LONDON, WEDNFSDAY EVENING, JUNE 12, 1344.

tions which Mr. Ward says load his desk and supply
his instructions, doubtless there are many communi-
cations from those who have specially instructed
the assassins of Mr. Whitty, -Mr. Dawson, and a
multitude of other victims. This is the key to the whole
of the outcry against Church property, which, whatever
its amount, cannot be in any way more injurious than
lay property, but which, from the hands in which it is
placed, and the way in which it is distributed, confers
social benefits, conferred by no other description of pro-
perty. It is the Protestant religion, and the Protestant
religion only, that is attacked through the Established
Church; and though we agree with Mr. Ross that the
Protestant religion would survive the spoliation of its
property, we do not see that its influence would bo
much improved by reducing its ministers to beggary,
and, perhaps, driving them to a competition of frauds
with the Bomish priesthood. A man survives a kick-
ing, but he loses influence, and too often loses self-
respect, by the operation.

STATE OF TRADE.
(From the Manchester Guardian of this day.)
There has been a good and steady business in the yarn
market during the last week, and prices are generally
firm, except for the higher counts, which have been for
some time past relatively higher than the rest, and have
now slightly receded. For manufactured goods the
market is not quite so good. The recent commercial
news from the East Indies and China not being considered
favourable, shirtings have slightly declined in price, and
are more difficult of sale ; but printing cloth is tolerably
firm, with a fair business doing.
ROCHDALE FLANNEL MARKET, MONDAY JUNE 10.—
We have had an improved demand for flannels to-day;
but the manufacturers complain much at the very low
prices offered by the merchants. The wool dealers have
not been very pressing to sell at former prices, on ac-
count of a report very generally circulated, that, at the
colonial wool sales in London last week, that article
fetched between ld. and lid. more than at the last sales.

IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT
(THIS EVENING.)

HOUSE OF COMMONS.
The SIELKBI took the Chair at Four o'clock.
DISSENTERS' CHAPELS BILL.

Mr. VIVIAN presented petitions against this Bill.
Lord C. MANNERS presented similar petitions
from Leicestershire.
Mr. EVANS also presented similar petitions.
Mr. Sergeant MURPHY presented petitions in
favour of the Bill from Limerick.
Lord INGESTRE presented petitions against the
Bill from Staffordshire.
Mr. SCHOLEFIELD presented a petition from
Birmingham against the Bank Charter Bill.
Mr. MACAULAY presented a petition from the
sawyers of Edinburgh, praying for a tax on machinery.
Lord C. MANNERS presented petitions from
Leicestershire, in favour of protection to agriculture.
Lord INGESTRE presented similar petitions
from Staffordshire.
Sir J. WALSH presented petitions against the
Dissenters' Chapels Bill.
Mr. T. EGERTON presented similar petitions
from Royton.
Lord ASHLEY presented petitions from Belfast
against the Dissenters' Chapels Bill.
Mr. GODSON postponed the Appeal in Cri-
minal Cases Bill for a fortnight.
Mr. SCOTT moved that the House should resolve
itself into a Committee on the Detached Parts of
Counties Bill.
Mr. BARNEBY moved that the Bill should be
committed that six months.
After a few words from Mr. SCOTT and Mr. M.
SUTTON, the amendment was withdrawn, and the Bill
was ordered to be sent to a Select Committee up stairs.
ALIENS BILL.

On the motion of Mr. HUTT, the above Bill wag
read a second time, and ordered to be committed on
the 26th instant.
SMOKE PROHIBITION BILL.

On the motion of Mr. MACKINNON, the House
went into Committee on this Bill pro forma, when it
was ordered to be re-committed on the 26th inst.
COUNTY COURTS BILL.

The report on the County Courts Bill was brought
up and received.
INCENDIARY FIRES IN SUFFOLK.
On the motion for reading the order of the day for
the adjourned debate on the Established Church of
Ireland being put,
Mr. MILNER GIBSON said he wished to put a
question to the Right Hon. Gentleman the Secretary
of State for the Home Department in reference to a
subject of considerable importance in that part of the
country with which he was connected—the county
of Suffolk. He alluded to the alarming spread-of in-
cendiary fires in Suffolk, Norfolk, and Essex. He had
received ninny communications on the subject, and if'
he were to attempt to enumerate the different fires
which had taken place in those counties since Mi-
chaelmas, the sum total would astonish the Members
of that House. The subject was creating great
anxiety, and he might almost say dismay in those
counties. He was himself a magistrate of Suffolk,
and bad many opportunities of forming some estimate
of the character of the labouring classes in that
county; and it was his firm belief, that generally the
labourers of that county were a well disposed and in-
lustrious class, and he believed they would
,shrink
with horror from such a crime as that of incendiarism;
and he believed that the occupying tenants and the
landowners generally were actuated by feelings
of kindness towards the labouring classes, and he
could enumerate many cases in which individuals
had taken steps to ameliorate their condition by
granting them allotments. Notwithstanding this,
they had the alarming fact before them that in-
cendiarism to a large extent existed. Raving
stated the grounds of the question, what he wanted
to know from the Right Honourable Gentleman
was, whether the subject of incendiarism in those
counties had occupied the full and serious attention of
her Majesty's Government.
Sir J. GRAHAM said, that with regard to the
statement with which the Hon. Gentleman prefaced
his question, he was happy to say from the inquiries
he made into the subject, that he concurred in the
praise the Honourable Gentleman had bestowed on
the gentry, tenants, and labourers of the county
of which the Hon. Gentleman was a magistrate.
He was also prepared to admit that incendiarism pre-
vailed to a deplorable extent throughout a portion
of the county of Suffolk and the adjacent parts of
Essex, and throughout the county of Norfolk. He
had already answered the question put to him by the
Hon. Gentleman, by stating that this painful subject
had occupied the serious attention of her Ma-
jesty's Government. It had been his duty to confer
with the lord-lieutenants and magistrates of those
counties, and every effort had been made by her Ma-
jesty's Government, as he had stated on a former oc-
casion, to detect the perpetrators of this dreadful
crime. Many fires might easily be the work of one
incendiary.—(Hear, hear.) The character which
the Hon. Gentleman had so justly given of the labour-
ing classes of that district, precluded the supposition
that any considerable portion of the peasantry had
been concerned in these fires. He thought they
were the work of very few individuals,
who were probably - actuated by personal
motives. He assured the Hon. Gentleman that if the
guilty parties were detected, the law should be put
into execution with the least possible delay.
Mr. M. GIBSON wished to ask the Right Hon.
Gentleman whether, In the cuurze of his inquiries on
the subject, he had been led to the conclusion that the
reckless spirit which had induced men to set
fire to premises might be induced by a pres-
sure of distress over which individuals had no
control, and whether the Government were
prepared to take into their consideration
the condition, generally, of the agricultural poor,
with a view of ascertaining whether there might not
be a something at the root of society, an under cur-
rent, as it were, which was producing this reckless-
ness and insensibility to the consequences of crime.
Sir J. GRAHAM said his inquiries had led him
to the conclusion that the causes were in no degree
of that nature.—(Hear, hear.) He believed that the
great body of the peasantry were not implicated.
Lord J. RUSSELL inquired whether any persons
had been tried for the offence ?
Sir J. GRAHAM said there had been four or five
convictions at the last Spring Assizes.
WRIT OF ERROR.—MR. O'CONNELL.
Mr. E. BULLER said considerable anxiety pre-
vailed as to the effect which the trial of the Writ of
Error in the House of Lords would have on the cir-
cuits. He wished to ask the Right Hon. Gentleman
if he could say when the appeal would come on for
hearin.
Sir 3. GRAHAM said he had every reason to be-
lieve that the writ of error had arrived in London,
or would arrive in the course of the next four-and-
twenty hours. So far as the Government was con-
cerned, every effort would 'be made to expedite the
hearing of the writ of error ; and he was persuaded
that it would be heard in time to enable the Judges
to
attend their respective circuits within ten days
after the usual period.
IRISH CHURCH.—(ADJOURNED DEBATE.)
Colonel RAWDON, on the order of the day for
resuming the adjourned debate being read, rose. He '
commenced by tendering his thanks to the Hon.
Member for Sheffield (Mr. Ward) for the zeal, the
industry, and the talent with which he had brought
this subject under the consideration of the House.
The efforts of that Hon. Gentleman were, he firmly
believed, mainly conservative. He maintained that
the true way of preserving the union between the
countries was to show a disposition to approach what
was called a grivance with a desire to remedy it. The
The Hon. Member for Sheffield had long laboured on

this subject. Year after year he had:brought the
question forward; it had gradually gained ground,
and it was high time that it should now produce
some practical result. The ciiy of Armagh which
he represented was the residence of two primates, one
of the English Church, and the other of what he

might be permitted to call the Irish Church. In
what situation did they find these two primates. One
was in the enjoyment of a splendid revenue inhabiting
a palace surrounded by a park, and having a seat
in the Legislature among the Peers of the realm.
And in the absence of the Viceroy he became one of
the Government of Ireland. Now he wished "to call
the attention of the people of England and the House
to the state in which he found his neighbour, the
Primate of the Irish Church. He lived in a humble
tenement, for which he paid rent. lie was
unnoticed and unrecognised by the Government.
He had no part in the making of any laws
—nay, he was not even permitted by statute, un-
der a penalty, to call himself what he was.
They were told forsooth that this was not galling.
Could the Roman Catholics look upon the relative
situation of the Roman Catholic and the Protestant
Prelates with indifference ? They were told that this
motion of the Hon. Member for Sheffield was a source
of irritation. He should consider that the annual
rejection of his motion was a much greater source of
irritatiOn. It was trifling with the feelings of the
people of Ireland.—(Hear.) The fact was that they
had mixed up this question too much with Mammon.
He hoped no Roman Catholic would take offence at
what he was about to say, but he believed that the
simplicity of the Protestant form of worship gave it
great advantages over the Roman Catholic. The Re-
corder of Dublin had admitted that the Protestant
religion had not been advanced by its wealth derived
from the State. Why, then, did they not change
their system, and, relying upon the simplicity of their
doctrines, see if that would not have more weight
with the people of Ireland ? The Honourable and
Learned Gentleman had told them that 95,0001.
had been subscribed within the last few years
by the , Protestants of Ireland for the build-
ing of churches. He rejoiced to hear it ; but
was not that such evidence of the zeal and prosperity
of the members of the Protestant Church in Ireland,
that it proved that there was no necessity for the
pecuniary encouragement of the State. He was
sorry to revert to the education question ; but
the Hon. and Learned Gentleman had adverted to the
schools which bad recently been erected, and he must
be permitted to say that the schools in the diocese
of Armagh had been erected in opposition
to the National System of Education. His eyes
had been opened to the real nature of the
Protestant Church Establishment by their hosti-
lity to the National System of Education.
He had heard in his own parish sentiments expressed
against that system, and he had heard sermons preached
against the plan, and knew a late instance in which a
bishop, who was appointed by the Right Hon. Baronet,
in his first charge expressed himself as strongly
opposed to the national system of education. This
proved to him (Colonel Rawdon) that these ministers
of the Church in Ireland were not the ministers of
peace. The time was now come when it was neces-
sary to ask whether the Government were in
earnest in their support of the national system of
education in Ireland. He thought they were bound
to ask the Right Hon. Gentleman whether he was
acting fairly in not giving the whole weight of the
Government in support of a system fur which the
country was taxed. The Noble Lord, the Secretary
for the Colonies, had originated the national system of
education in Ireland, and would that Noble Lord now
allow that system, for want of protection, to wither? The
Noble Lord, the Secretary for Ireland, had made use of
1 ss argument in his speech last night than he (Colonel
Rawdon) had ever heard in any speech before. His
speech was made up merely of quotations of eminent
men. Those eminent men were distinguished for
being in advance of public opinion of their day, and he
(Colonel Rawdon) believed that if those eminent
men could come again amongst us, they would still
be in advance of the public opinion of the day.
He wished to address himself to the Right Hon.
Gentleman at the head of the Government; he wished
to allude in most distinct terms to the declaration of the
Duke of Wellington, that the present Church of Ireland
was the foundation on which the union depended. For
his own part he could not see why the Act of Union
was to be thrust down the throats of the people of
Ireland. The great object of the Hon. Member for
Sheffield was to alter in some measure the laws re-
lating to the temporalities of the Church. With such
opinions how could he (Col. Rawdon) much longer
consent to be a party to that act of union, if he were
to be told that it rested on the Irish Church Esta-
blishment ? No reason whatever had been shown,
that the act of union would not be firmer and
stronger by placing the temporalities of the Church
on a proper and equitable footing. The Right
Hon. Baronet at the head of the Government (Sir
R. Peel)' on the recent discussion of the Dissenters'
Chapels Bill, had shown a wish to do what was
right. He (Colonel Rawdon) had recorded his vote
for the Government in support of that Bill, although,
he believed his constituents did not participate
in his approval of it. This would show
the Right Hon. Baronet (Sir R. Peel) that if he
were disposed and determined to do justice he had
but to throw himself on that side of the House, and
then all measures brought forward by him and
founded on those principles would be carried
triumphantly. Though he (Colonel Rawdon) had
his predilections he was an independent mem•
ber, and if the Right Honourable Baronet
showed the disposition to do justice he should be very
willing to come forward and give him his
support. He, the Right Honourable Gentleman,
had but to be just—to fear not. In speak-
ing the other evening on the Bill he had
referred to the Right Hon. Gentleman (Sir Robert
Peel) had finished a beautiful eulogium on the
Established Church, by expressing his hope and
opinion that she would never allow her doctrines to
be thrown against the eternal principles of justice.
This had been put forward to the people in Parlia-
ment, but it had been put forward in a more emphatic
shape, in an address to public opinion out of doors,
which was signed by many Irish representatives,
to which he was sorry that circumstances did
not permit him to attach his name. It was evi•
dent that many of the Liberal representatives
from Ireland had lost all confidence in that House,
from which they appealed to a sense of justice outside
the walls of Parliament. In that address to which
he begged to call the attention of the Right Hon.
Baronet at the head of the Government was
demanded the recognition of perfect equality in
regard to ecclesiastical and educational arrangements
between the several religious communities into which
the population of the country was divided. What
could be more moderate than that demand? It
was what had been carried on in practice in
England and Scotland. They neglected to
carry out that principle with regard to
Ireland. It was matter of history that both Houses
of Parliament stood pledged to redress the grievances
of II eland, and could any man say that the
state of the Established Church of Ireland was
not a grievance to the Catholic population of
that country ? He denied that the Act of Union
tied up their hands with regard to this subject; but,
at all events, it should be recollected that the Parlia-
ment of that day was very differently constituted to
what it would be now. If they wished to avoid a
revolution they ought to adopt a principle of common
sense.—(Cries of " hear, hear.") He was sorry to
say that, in the present state of Ireland, foreign
powers had too much to offer to her. It was not safe
to leave things in their present state —(Hear ) He
knew it might he said that this was not patriotic, and
he knew how easily it was to get up a cheer in that
House, by a contrary sentiment, but he maintained
that their business was to tell the truth.—(Hear.)
and he would again repeat that foreign powers had
too much to offer. He had lately conversed with
many foreigners, particularly with Protestant Ger-
mans, who had themselves broached the subject to him.
He lied talked much with Protestant Germans and
others, but in the whole course of his experience, on
the Continent, he had never found a man who could
understand the state of their relations. lie thought
they ought to take warning from what philosophical
writers like Kohl said upon this subject.. He declared
with all sincerity his belief that soceae.r or later the
continuance of this state of things would lead to
a revolution in Ireland. He would not tres-
pass any longer on the attention .of the House.
He had given utterance to his Ancere beliet,
that the Church temporalities were the 'cause of much
irritation, and that the union itself was weakened by
the present state of things. He would only, in con-
clusion' appeal shortly to what he hop ed still existed
in that House, namely, an independent party. There
was such 'a party in that House in forneer days, and
from the opinions expressed by many Hon . Gentlem en
opposite he hoped that such a party still existed.
He hoped that party would show a disposition to uct
fairly towards Ireland, and that they would ;let in
accordance with the dictates of justice and of commem
sense.

Sir J. WALSH said that, notwithstanding, the
general absence of an offensive tone in the free ch of
the Hon. Member for Sheffield, there weim. some
parts of that speech open to objection. He said, for
instance that from the earliest period, the govern-
ment of Ireland by this country had been a uniform
course of oppression. That was a statement that he
could hardly have expected to hear from an Hon.
Member who, was a friend to British co innegtion.
They might regret the severity of the penal lav'vs, but
they were not made to bolster up the Iri, Ai Church.
They were enacted to secure the Protest succes-
sion. There was another thing which 'fie much 're-
gretted, and that was the introduction of personal topics
into the Hon. Member's speech. He thought the sanctity
of private life ought not to be lightly invaded, as the
Members of this House posses3ed 'the privileges of
saying what they chose and giving. gi :eat publicity to
what they said—they ought to vse, those privileges
with great discretion. He .knew no of Arch-
deacon De Lacy, but the Hon. Memb, -,r had held him
up to a sort of reprehension hi that I
-Louse, as having
been a luxurious and pampered ecclesia,
itic, when the
House knew nothing of the; e'tnoes,except
rournst.

that he appeared to have spent a large private
fortune in acts of amity.— (Hear, hear.)
If ever national faith ought tobe preserved, it should
be preserved on the present iccasion, it had never
been more solemnly pledged than it had been to the
maintenance of the Protestint Church of Ireland.
It was of quite as much imlortance to preserve the
national faith in our domesti, as in our foreign rela-
tions. If the whole of the Ink Protestants agreed to
this proposition that might iniced cancel the engage-
raent;:but as it was at preseit the national faith was
pledged to the maintenance of the Protestant Church
in Ireland. The Hon. Member had repeated what
had often been quoted in that House, the declaration
of the Right Hon. Baronet it the head of her Ma-
jesty's Government some lear4 ago, that Ire-
land was his principle dificulty in conducting
the Government of this country. Ireland
did constitute a great difficulty, and he
(Sir J. Walsh) was quite sire that there was no
Government that could be formed—no possible, no
probable, no imaginary Government that would not
find the question of the government of Ireland an
extremely difficult and completed one. But he did
not think that the difficulties o-governing Ireland had
been fully stated by the -Hon.Member for Sheffield.
The promblem a statesman hat to solve was, how to
govern a country, which was nost unhappily divided
and disturbed by religious Cifierences—differences
existing between two iarties of almost
equal force- and importanc) in the country.
Ireland was unhappily dividel by religious differ-
ences, and the Protestant partyin Ireland constituted
the mind and intelligence, and w'alth of the country. It
was a mistake to suppose that them were few Protestaßts
in Ireland, besides those wile held large landed
estates. They, in fact, were as numerous in the large
towns as the Catholics. The striking of the
late special jury list in Dubin, proved that the
flower of the middle class in Ireland in the large
towns were Protestants. He trusted that the ma-
jority on the present motion would be so large,
that the Erotestants of Ireland may be at rest as
to the maintenance of their rights and privi-
leges, but he at the same time would desire to
see a provision made for the Roman Catholic clergy
which he thousht would contribute to the pacification
of the country.
Mr. M. O'CONNELL said that the Hon. Baronet
who had just sat down would, it seemed, most gladly
make a provision for the Roman Catholic Clergy of
Ireland which was not wanted by them, and which
they refused—(hear, hear) ;—but he would not give
them that to which they were justly entitled. The
time was when they would have gladly accepted
such a provision ; but the Honourable Baronet
might thank the party with which he, at present
acted that their proposal was not received. He
thought the allusion to the want of interest mani-
fested upon this subject was more infelicitous, be-
cause it could not be supposed that after listening to
a long discussion on the mode of preserving dead
bodies they could give a very rigid attention to the
important motion of the Hon. Member for Sheffield.
They had already induced a state of despondency in
Ireland ; by their vote that night they might super-
induce a state of despair, tied what would be result of
that it was impossible to say. Consenting to go into
a Committee on this subject at this late period of the
Session would be a matter of much importance.
What Irish measures had been iiitroduced in this
Session ?—(Hear.) The Irish Registration Bill had
convinced the majority of the people of Ireland
that the Government intended to limit, rather than
extend, the franchise. The Municipal Registration
Bill was, if possible, still more offensive, and if it ever
came to be discussed he believed that would be
proved to be the fact.—(Hear.) He alone had
presented during the present session, more than 300
petitions against that measure. Now, they had an
opportunity at present of exciting the gratitude
of the Irish people by going into Committee on this
subject. The State trials were over. Had they
checked the influence of the conspirators?
Had they not at this moment a cry throughout Ire-
land for the great measure of relief which it had
been their effect to preclude.
(LEFT SPEAKING.)

TUESDAY NIGHT'S GAZETTE.
FOREIGN-OFFICE. JUNE 10, 1844.
It is hereby notified that the Lords Commissioners of the
Admiralty have received a dispa.ch, dated the 18th of May
last, from Sir Charles Adam, K.C.13., Vice-Admiral of
the White, and Commander-in-Chief of her Majesty's
ships and vessels on the North American and West
India station and the seas adjacent, stating, that, in
virtue of authority drily conferred upon him, he had declared a
blockade of the port of San Juan de Nicaragua; and that the
same was established on the 30th of March last. It is further
notified, that the measures sanctioned by the law of nations
will be adopted and executed with respect to all vessels and
eargoes attempting to violate the said blockade.
Commission by the Lord Lieutenant of Sussex.
Arundel and Bramber Corps of Sussex Yeomanry Cavalry-
J. Montefiore, Gent., to be Cornet, May 30.
WHITEHALL, May 25.
The Lord Chancellor has appointed R. J. Crosse, of South
Melton, in the county of Devon, Gent., to be a Master Extra-
ordinary in the High Court of Chancery.
BANKRUPTS.
JAMES HEWARD, farmer, Hendon, Middlesex, to sur-
render June 18, at twelve, and July 26, at eleven, at the Court
of Bankruptcy. Whitmore, official assignee, Basinghall-street;
Raw, Furnival's Inn.
DANIEL ROSS, warehouseman, Little Love-lane, City,
June 18, at two, and July 19, at eleven, at the Court of
Bankruptcy. Pennell, official assignee, Basinghall-street ;
Dixon and Overbury, Frederick's-place, Oid Jewry.
FREDERICK ROGERS, miller, Cooknoe, Northampton-
shire, June 13, at half-past one, and July 24, at eleven, at the
Court of Bankruptcy. Bell, official assignee, Coleman-street-
buildings; Catlin, Ely-place.
JAMES DEALTRY, grocer, Burslem, Staffordshire, June
25, and July IP, at twelve, at the Manchester District Court.
Stanway, official assignee, Manchester; Hitchcock, Buckley,
and Tidswell, Manchester ; Johnson, Son, and Weatberall,
Temple, London.
GEORGE GROVE, miller, Wick and Abson, Gloucester-
shire, June 21, at twelve, and July 23, at eleven, at the Bristol
District Court. Acraman, official assignee, Bristol ; Daniels
and Barker, Bristol:
HENRY LAKE, printer, Cheltenham, June, 18, at eleven;
and July 23, at one, at the Bristol District ourt.
official assignee, Bristol ; Boodle, Cheltenham.
NOTICES OF INSOLVENCY.
W. Massingham, clock maker, King's Lynn.
W. Forty, horse dealer, Upper Slaughter, Gloucestershire.
W. Westfield, butcher, Randwick, Gloucestershire.
J. Tarlton, farrier, Gough-street North, Gray's Inn-road.
R. Spillett, farmer, Lenham, Kent.
T. Peel, freight-collector, Liverpool.
E. Wilson, schoolmaster, Marylebone.
J. Overton, solicitor, Tavistock-place.
J. Mahony, chee-emonger, Union-street, Southwark.
E. P. Walcam, Clifton, Bristol.
J. Bickle, licensed victualler, 13,th.
C. Scovell, tailor, Walcot, Somersetshire.
E. M. Hague, schoolmistress, Richmond, Surrey.
J. Davies,-fellmonger, Kingsutton, Northamptonshire.
J. Tench, Birmingham.
T. Markey, dealer in provisions, Manchester.
R. Parker, ship-chandler, Gravesend.
J. W. Wright, Charsfield, Suffolk.
H. Harris, sheet-iron roller, Gothersly, Staffordshire.
J. W. Wood, Birmisghain.
J. Tarbotton, provision dealer, Knaresborough.
C. Copley, farmer's servant, Colton, Yorkshire.
H. Hart, steel pen manufacturer, Napier-street, Heston.
E. Bobbitt, house agent, London-street, St. Pancras.
T. Bodger, carpenter, Hatton- garden.
N. Daniell, dentist, Charlotte-street, Fitzroy-square.
W. Baker, currier, Bedford-row, East-street, Old Kent-road.
G. Roalfe, carpenter, Bishopsbourne, Kent.
W. Lewin, carter, Upper Thames-street, City.
S. Stephens, porkman, Blackfriars-road.
A. Bird, beerseller, Kidderminster.
J. Santer, sen., hop dealer, Devonshire-buildings, Dover-road,
J. Hennessey, Weedon Becke, Northamptonshire.
H. T. Archer, attorney, St. John-street, Adelphi.
J. Barnett, beer-seller, Twerton, Somersetshire.
J. Eyres, smith, Great Alie-street, Goodman's-fields.
T. Bethell, tailor, Great Charlotte-street, Blackfriars-road.
R. Baker, currier, Bedford-row, East•street, Old Kent-road.
E. Stallard, fellmonger, Buriton, Hampshire.
J. T. Farnell, schoolmaster, Norwich.
G. F. S. Gillard, grocer, Commercial-road, Lambeth.
J. Menzies, South-bank, Regent's-park.
H. Benjamin, traveller, Little Alie-street, Goodman's-fields.
J. Prince, licensed victualler, Bath.
H. G. Basham, road contractor, Stroud, Gloucestershire.
T. Jeeves, bricklayer, Hitchin, Hertfordshire.
H. F. C. Finnis, carver, Hanvay-street, Oxford-street.
S. Yearsley, attorney, Leckhampton, Gloucestershire.
J. Colton, rope maker, West Retford, Nottinghamshire.
J. Brazendalo, publican, Liverpool.
J. Ward, beer shopkeeper, Yorkshire.
S. Glover, painter, Yorkshire.
M. Hughes, snuff dealer, Birmingham.
J. Smith, manager of a silk mill, Leek, Staffordshire.
H. B. Hall, engraver, College-street, Islington.
J. Clark, Orsett, Essex.
R. Newbury, baker, Cambridge.
W. Wilson, farmer, Long Sutton, Lincolnshire.
J. Baldock, labourer, Brenchley, Kent.
C. Cole, attorney's clerk, Brunswick-street, Islington.
J. Froggett, trimming manufacturer, Phoenix-st., Spitalfields.
W. Peachey, sen., butcher, Tooley-street, Southwark.
E. Bathurst, Banbury, Oxfordshire.
J. W. Hutchins, stone mason, Ipswich.
T. Merritt, coach maker, Pump-row, City-road.
SECOND NOTICES.
G. Chamberlain, carpenter, Praed-street, Paddington, June
17, at eleven, at the Court of Bankruptcy. Graham, official
assignee.
W. Swan, fisherman, Great Yarmouth, June 17, at twelve,
at the Court of Bankruptcy. Turquand, official assignee.
T. Smith, gun-maker, High-Holborn, June 17, at half-
past twelve, at the Court of Bankruptcy. Graham, official
assignee.
J. Luckett, coffee-house keeper, Adam-street West, Bryan-
stone-square, June 17, at half past eleven, at the Court of
Bankruptcy. Tnrquand, official assignee.
A. Benjamin, dairyman, Gravel-lane, Hounsditch, June 17,
at half-past eleven, at the Court of Bankruptcy. Graham,
official assignee.
T. Cornhili, coffee-house proprietor, Coleman-street, City,
June 17, at eleven, at the Court of Bankruptcy. Turquand,
official assignee.
J. Bond, tailor, Manchester, June 17, at twelve, at the Man•
chester District Court. Fraser, official assignee.
G. Carreer, edge tool grinder, Sheffield, June 15, at eleven,
at the Leeds District Court._ Fearne, official assignee.
W. Ellerson, horse dealer, Eynesford, Kent, June 15, at
eleven, at the Court of Bankruptcy. Edwards, official assignee.
W. Barthram, livery stablekeeper, Raven-row, Mile-end,
June 15, at eleven, at the Court of Bankruptcy. Edwards,
official assignee.
R. A. Jefferiss, journeyman butcher, East-street, Walsworth,
June 15; at eleven, at the Court of Bankruptcy. Edwards,
official assignee.
J. Slade, carpenter, Bexley, Kent, June 18, at half-past
twelve, at the Court of Bankruptcy. Johnson, official assignee.
D. Henry, engraver, Leeds, June 15, at eleven, at the Leeds
District Court. Hope, official assignee.
T. Cope, New Lenton, Nottinghamshire, June 15, at eleven,
at the Leeds District Court. Fearne, official assignee.
W. Whiteley, scissors manufacturer, Sheffield, June 15, at
eleven, at the Leeds District Court. Fearne, official assignee.
G. Davenport, saw dealer, Sheffield, June 15, at eleven, at
the Leeds District Court. Fearne, official assignee.
J. Swinscoe, wood turner, West-bar, Yorkshire, June 15,
at eleven, at the Leeds District Court. Hope, official assignee.
T. Mason, tailor, Sheffield, June 15, at eleven, at the Leeds
District Court. Fearne, official assignee.
J. Kerby, licensed victualler, Bristol, June 18, at eleven, at
the Bristol District Court. Kynaston, official assignee.
T. Hodgson, joiner, Otley, 'Yorkshire, June 15, at eleven,
at the Leeds District Court. Young, official assignee.
L. Alman, musical instrument seller, Bristol, June 17, at
eleven, at the Bristol District Court. Miller, official assignee.
J. Sutcliffe, carrier's agent, Halifax, Yorkshire, June 15, at
eleven, at the Leeds District Court. Freeman, official assignee.
J. Noke, railway porter, Manchester, June 17, at twelve, at
the Manchester District Court. Fraser, official assignee.
DIVIDENDS.
At the Court of Bankruptcy, Basinghall-street.
W. Butterworth, corn merchant, Peckham, July 2, at half-
past eleven-W. and E. Wheeler, horse dealers, Oxford, July
2, at eleven-R. Goodwin, ironmonger, Eton, Buckingham..
shire, July 2, at half-past one-J. Orbell, miller, Brundon,
Essex, July 2, at two-G. Eshelby, currier, Gate-street, Lin.
coin's Inn-fields, July 2, at one-J. R. Stringer, wholesale
clothier, Hounsditch, July 4, at half-past twelve-G. Henley,
otherwise G. S. Henley, auctioneer, Pall-mall, July 2, at
twelve-T. Arnold, bookseller, Paternoster. row, July 2, at two
-W. Ball, bookseller, Paternoster-row, July 2, at three-W.
Marsham, broker, Angel-court, Throgmortcn-street, July 2,
at twelve-W. Street, grocer, Rickinghall Superior, Suffolk,
July 4, at eleven-T. A. Curtis, merchant, Tokenhouse-yard,
July 2, at half-past twelve-J. B. and J. Inglis, merchants,
Mark-lane, July 4, at half-past eleven-W. Walford, merchant,
Great Winchester-street, July 2, at one-G. Reach, miller,
Bardwell, Suffolk, July 4, at twelve-C. Sharp and W. D.
Clarke, upholsterers, Berners-street, Mary lebone, July 2, at
eleven-N. Davis, innkeeper, Westerham, Kent, July 2, at
one-G. Field, packer, Bond-court, Wallbrook, July 2, at two
-A. Sparke, wine merchant, Jewin-crescent, Jewin-street,
July 2, at eleven-J. Deacon, draper, Whitechapel-road, July
a, at two-O. Ei,Ko, u m iivvt manufacturer, Rotherhithe,
July 2, at twelve.

. -
In the Country.
W. Miers, oil merchant, Leeds, July 4, at eleven, at the
Leeds District Court—P. J. Papillon, wine merchant, Leeds,
July 4, at eleven, at the Leeds District Court—H. Parker, 0.
Shore, J. Brewin, and J. Rodgers, bankers, Sheffield, July 4,
at eleven, at the Leeds District Court—J. Harford and W. W.
Davies, iron masters, Bristol, July 2, at eleven, at the Bristo
District Court—J. Crump, corn dealer, Stanway, Gloucester-
shire, July 5, at eleven, at the Bristol District Court —J. Ab-
bott, cotton manufacturer, Blackburn, Lancashire, July 5, at
twelve, at the Manchester District Court—T. Millar, hosier,
Liverpool, July 5, at twelve, at the Manchester District Court
—W. Whitefield, grocer, Bridgewater, Somersetshire July 4,
at eleven, at the Exeter District Court--W. Slade,' boot
maker, Bridport, Dorsetshire, July 4, at eleven, at the Exeter
District Court.

CERTIFICATES to be granted, unless cause be shown to the
contrary, on the day herein-mentioned.
H. Wyer, tailor, Newington-causeway, July 2—J. Hudson,
leather seller, Fore-street, July 2—T. Adams, publican, New-
port, Isle of Wight, July 5—G. Rothory, currier, Wakefield,
Yorkshire, July 5—S. Brothers, currier, Newcastle-under-
Lyme July 12—G. E. Phillips, saddler Plymouth, July 4
P. Seddon, coal dealer, Middle Hulton, Lancashire, July 4
T. Lay, grocer, Dudley, Worcestershire, July 2—J. Faulkner,
builder, Danvers-street, Chelsea, July 2—J. and G. Ewart,
auctioneers, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, Snly 2—C. B. Bayley,
draper, Abingdon, Berkshire, July 2—1!.. Rogers, fire brick
manufacturer, Abingdon, Berkshire, July 2f-11. Stevens,
china dealer, New-cut, Lambeth, July 2—E. Poore, druggist,
Bampton, Devonshire, July 2—C. Willsmer, draper, Tilling-
ham, Essex, July 2—S. W. Leonard, butcher, Frances-street,
Golden-square, July 2.
_ PARTNERSHIPS DISSOLVED._
_

E. Johnson and W. Farrar, coach builders, Birkenhead,
Cheshire—C. Cbirney, T. Beacham, and T. Chirney, Albion•
place, King's. cress—J. Jordan and J. Jackson, fruiterers,
Leeds—J. Robertson and H. M. Shaw, Birchin-lane—B,
Cribb, W. Cribb, and H. Marshall, blacking manufacturers,
Clarence-wharf, Regent's-park-basin E. and G. Holt,
grocers, Petworth, Sussex—J. Sisman andillwe7Seat.a:nsdy.Ao
njos)truok_lnys
h,jli.brsre,uw.
as brush
makers, Charles-street, Grosvenor-square—R. Edmondson, W.
Edmondson, and J. Edmondson wood-berew manufacturers,
Manchester—G. A. Scott and 'T. C. Simmons, nine met-
chants, Mark-lane—E. Weston, G. Lunt, And J. Simpson,
corn
HodgsonAnlilEl millers,
d,L Liverpool
OW, mper merchant,
(so
t:
nf
surgeons,at
pa as
nr ed gea
,rsdjwsuiEnn
June
SCOTCH SEQUESTRATION.
twelve, at the British Hotel, Dundee.

BULLS BLESSED sw BELLES.—The Spanish ladies
seem almost as fond of the sanguinary effects of bull-feasts
as the Romans were of the scenes in their amphitheatres.
When a bull, that has got a character in some of filo former
feasts, has been passing by, I have heard some of the ladies
cry, "0 the dear creature!" and others, "Blessed he the
soul of the mother who bore thee I thou bast killed thy six
men."—Spence.

A LIBEL.--A temperance lecturer lately said thAt
an old bachelor is a living libel on his father and mother,