The Sun.
London, England, 1828-10-07 00:00:00

POLICE INTELLIGENCE.

MANSION-HOUSE.—Yesterday a young man, named
"Webb, of respectable appearance, came to complain against
the Church*wardens and Overseers of the parish of St.
Mary Woolchurcli, Lombard-street, for having refused to
give him the means of supporting nature.
Sir PETER expressed , surprise at hearing such a com-
plaint from a person who seemed to be so much above a

pauper in appearance, education, and address.
The -Vestry Clerk of St. Mary Woolchurch stated, that
the case stood completely by itself. It was one of the most
incredible description. The pauper was the son of a
clergyman, whose income amounted to at least 2,0001. a
year, and who officiated amongst the most exalted ranks
of society. The authorities of the parish were of course
unwilling to support the pauper, when the individual
upon whom he had so powerful a claim was so well able to
contribute to his necessities.

Sir PrrEa LAURIE.-Certainly not ; hut let us hear
the circumstances. There surely must he some singular
cause-fire such a departure from the natural course of things.
The Vestry Clerk stated, that the Rev. Mr. Webb was,
according to the pauper's description, a minor Canon of

St. Paul's, a minor canon of Westminster, vicar of
Langley, in ,Iludingliamshire, Minister of the Chapel
Royal at .Windsor, and of the Chapel Royal at St.
fames's, and woe also possessed of a living in liertford-
shire. The pauper had applied two years ago to the
parish for assistance, and had candidly stated the flourish-
ing state of his father's circumstances. On that -occasion
the parish officers wrote to the Rev. Gentleman respecting
the condition of his son, and. their :expectation that some
measures would be immediately taken to remove such a
burden from the parish. To this application the Rev.
Gentlensan replied, by declining to give the slightest relief
to his son, and stating. that he obtained a good situation for
the pauper, which the pauper lost by his own misconduct,
and that he (the Rev. Gentleman) had other family claims
to which he was obliged to give his attention.
Sir PETER LAURIE (to the pauper)—Are yon the legi-
timate child of your father? Pauper—Certainly.
Sir PETER-And is your mother alive?—The pauper
replied. in the negatiVe. His father had married a second
wife, and he had not eeen or had any communication with
the Rev. gentleman for six years.
The Vestry Clerk said, that the parish officers did not
at first credit the unfortunate pauper, his story was so
completely at variance with human feeling, but they found
that it was true.

Sir- PETEII: LAURIE-What was the misconduct by
which you lost your situation? Pauper—l was a clerk at
Messrs. Everett!, the bankers, and a person in their em-
ployment took some money. I knew of the fact, and did
not mention it. I was discharged on that account.

Sir PETER LAURIE—Was that the utmost extent of
your misconduct? Pauper—The only offence 1 ever
committed. -

Sir PETER-L-And your father knew it? Pauper—He
(lid. My employers can bear testimony to my irreproach-
able conduct in every other respect. The best proof of
their good opinion is, that they have at various times given
me employment. When they had no employment for me
as a clerk, in order to keep me from complete destitution,
they employed me as a footman. That kept me from star-
vation.

- - - .
Sir PETER LA U RlE—Did you,write to your father about
your privations? Pauper—Repeatedly, but in vain.
.• Sir PETER—Did he give you no relief? Pauper—Since
I lost my situation he gave me 51. ; six years have elapsed
since that' time. I wrote to him that if he did not do some
little thing for me, I must apply to :may parish, to prevent
me from resorting to any desperate extremity for the sup-
port of my existence.
Sir PerEa—Good God ! And did hegive you nothing?
Pauper—Nothing--not a farthing.
Sir PrrnitL-Young man, you must either be a very bad
son, or your father must have a very hard -beast ; which is
it ? Pauper—My father's heart is like a stone. He was
aware of my wretchedness. He even refused, to pay me,
in my distress, the money be owed me: When he was
taking the benefit of the Insolvent Act in 1821, I 'advanced
30/. to him to meet the expences, and he would not. pay me
one farthing.
Sir PETER—If you misrepresent on this dreadful occa-
sion, you must meet with a direct contradiction ; and
nothing can prove a base heart more effectually than a
falsehood under such circumstances. Pauper—l have told
the truth. lie bas nothing to accuse me of but the error
I have stated. My employers, who have been very kind
to me, can, if applied to, state that no further offence has
ever been laid to my charge.
The Vestry Clerk stated that the representation of the
pauper, upon the present occasion, differed in no respect
from his statement to them., There was no reason to
doubt it. The parish authorities bad, upon this second
application of the pauper, written again to the Rev. Gen-
tleman, and stated to him, thatif he' persisted in refusing
aid to his unfortunate son, the case
:Tilust inevitably appear
before the public. No notice was taken of this appeal,
and the young man must either be supported by the parish
or die of hunger.
Sir PETER—This is is scarcely to be believed. I never
heard any thing more dreadful. Did the father make no
other excuse for abandoning his child than that of other
claims ? Vestry Clerk—None. He said he had taken a
great deal of trouble in getting his son a situation ; and that
his son having lost that situation by his conduct, he could
not do anything further for him.
Pauper—l have tried every means of gettineinto bread. 1
went to Brighton, and got a place at one of the libraries,
which I kept till it was Alit up. I wrote to my father,
that if lie did not (lo something for me, I must go to the
parish, or do something worse. -
Sir PE rut—And he refused you ? Pauper—He never
took notice of my letter.
Sir Prrea—And he id a minister of Christ ? Pauper--
He has livings to the amount'of upwards of 2,0001. a-vear.
Sir PETER—And what were the debts which he white-
washed, as they call the passing through the Insolvent Court?
Pauper—l believe about 3,0001.

Sir PETER-And did .he give up ad), of his situations to
pay his creditors ? Pauper—Not one. He agreed, I be-
lieve, to pay annually something to the liquidation of his
debts. He pays curates for officiating for him, for he sel-
dom or never acts himself. lam anxious to accept of any
situation which will preserve me from a degrading depend-
ence upon the parish, and my former employers will speak
favourably of me, notwithstanding the error into which I
unfortunately fell.
Sir PETER—Is this person of whom yoU speak married
to a second wife ? Pauper-4le is.
Sir PETER-And who are the claimants upon his 2,0001.
a year? Pauper—His wife and three children.
Sir PETER-To what do you attribute this strange per-
version of nature? Is the Rev. Gentleman penurious?
Pauper—No : the reverse. He keeps an establishment, and
is expensive in his habits, I believe ; but I know but little
about him, not having seen him for six years.
Sir PETER-Has he no feeling for:your forlorn condi-
dition ? Pauper—Not the most distant; no more than if.
I never existed. He never casts a thought upon me.
Sir PETER-In all my experience I never met with any
thing like this. And this man is the religious instructor
of the people. He abandons. his child to misery, and the
temptation which every where .assail .poverty in this city.
He will not forgive in his son that which those who suf-
fered by the .offence, and were.strangers, pardoned. Ile
will look on while. his. flesh and blood-, perishes in the
streets, and he receives his .2,0001. a-year, and comforts
himself in the reflection that _he is a minister of the .Gos-
pel ! The picture is frightful.
The Vestry Clerk said he supposed that another applica-
tion would be attended to.

Sir PETER.--I dare say it will. It will probably be
made through a more commanding. channel. It is rather
too much for poor persons, who can scarcely pay the rates,
to be supporting the son of a clergyman whu has such
pluralities.
The entry Clerk—We shall coatinue to assist him
until wegirear from his father.

SIC PETER—.Certainly, do. You will bear from his
father, and his father will, depend upon it, hear from you:
If he have no touch of humanity, he probably has sonie
sense of shame.

Mr. Hobler—The parish can compel him to assist his
son, and I think they must compel him.
The parties then left the Justice-room.

GUILDHALL —Joseph Howard, aged 19, who has
been employed for the last four years as a porter on the
premises of Mr. Lynch, a wholesale dealer in coffee, in
Size-lane, was brought up on suspicion of having stolen
401. in notes, and 70/. in gal and silver, out of a tin cash
box in his master's desk, on Saturday last.
Martin, the officer, permanently stationed at this jut:-
flee-room, 'had examined the premises and found no marks
of breaking in or out. The lock of the desk was taken off,
and the smith was of opinion, from the appearance of the
dust, upon which any other than the ordinary key would
have left an impression, that Mr. Lynch had left his desk
unlocked upon this occasion. The prisoner probably dis-
covered this in cleaning out the counting-house. The sky-
light was raised on an inclined plane, a part of the lower
half being moveable, and sliding under the upper when it
was necessary to admit air. This window was fastened by
a rope, which was cut close to the ring to which it was
tied, and if it had been cut by a person standing on the
leads, there must have been an inch or two of rope left
hanging upon the ring. He was sure no person bad en-

tered by that window. He thought the - prisoner had
mounted the bags of coffee, and cut the rope- on the inside,
that he might threw out the banker's cheques, &c.,011 the
leads, and raise a suspicion that the thieves escaped in that
direction. A regular houSehreaker would have left nothing
behind.. He searched the prisoner's lodging, and also .the
boxes of the female servants in the house, without gaining
a clue. •
Mr. 'Alderman Scnotre remanded the prisoner for fur-
ther examination on Friday next.
William Rocket, a stout old man, who says he was
formerly a butcher, was charged with knowingly attempt-
ing to pass a forged cheque for 191. 7s. 6d. on Messrs.
Pares and Heygate, purporting to be drawn
.by George
Smith, in favour of M. Jenkins, Esq., and dated Oct. 2.
The Prisoner was dismissed.
BOW- STREET.—Yesterday Joseph Arnold, owner
and driver of the hackney-coach, No. 85, appeared to sup-
port a summons which he had obtained against a Mrs.
flolmes, whom he charged with having broken one of the
Windows of his coach, the amount of which she refused to
pay him.
From the evidence of the coachman it appeared that
Mrs. Holmes hired the coach in• que4ion in Whitechapel,
nearly opposite the Red Lion, with directions to drive to
her residence in Liverpool-street, Broad-street, city. As
soon as she was seated in the coach, she pulled up the
widow, and in doing so smashed the glass. Having driven
the lady to Liverpool-street, the witness demanded the
amount of the broken window, which she refused to pay ;
whereupon he (the coachman) gave the young man now
present into - the custody of a watchman, as be was the
person who had called him froni his stand.
Mrs. Holmes distinctly denied that she had broken the
coach-window, and a gentleman named Lewis, at whose
house she had passed the evening, and who had handed
her into the coach, declared also that Mrs. Holmes had sot
smashed the glass, and added, to the best of his belief,
that it vas broken before she entered the coach.
Mr. HALLS asked the coachman whether lie could not
distinctly swear that the glass was whole before the lady
entered the coach ?—The• coachman said, that he was posi •
tive the lady must have done the mischief, because a short
time before. both his glasses were whole, he having been
engaged in cleaning them.
Mr. HALLS—How long before the lady took your coach
had you aeon that both your glasses were uninjured ?
Coachman—AN:Mt 'three hours; your Worship.
Mr. HaLLs,--Might not the glass have been broken in
the interval? Coachman—No such thing, your Worship;
I swears that the lady broke my glass.
Mrs. Holmes—l positively deny that 1 did so. Finding
a draught of air in the coach, I very gently raised the win-
dow ; in doing so I heard the glass shake ; and before I
had .half raised the window, the glass fell into the street.

I immediately called to Mr. Lewis t 4 notice the cjreuui-
stance, in case the coachman should attempt to make any
charge for the damage.
Coactman—Will your Worship be pleased to swear the
lady ?
Mr..HALus—.-Certainly, if she feels no objection.
Mrs. Holmes—Not in the least.
The oath was then administered, and Mrs. Holmes re-
peated distinctly, not only that she herself -had not broken
the glass, hut that to the best of her belief itliad been broken
before she touched it.
A gentleman present said that it was constantly the prac-
tice of hackney-coachmen to charge persons with breaking
the glasses of their coaches; and in this way they were often
paid four or five times for the same damage. ,
Mr. Hm.r.s—lf that be the fact, it is necessary that the

public. should he protected from such impositions. At •the
same time, it is requisite t hat hackney-coachmen should be
protected also. lam afraid I must decide against you, Madam.
Mr. Holmes (the defendant's husband)—The lady, Sir,
has sworn that she did not break the. glass
" But the coachman has sworn that she did," said the
Magistrate. •
Mr. Lewis—l am a witness for Mrs. Holmes, and I de-
clare that she did not break the window.

Mr. HALLS—The coachman swears to the contrary: I
am bound to believe ins oath.

Mr. Lewis—l should think, Sir, yuu are least: equally
bound to believe that of the lady.

11Ir. HALLS—SO I do, but I think she id mistaken. I
decide in favour of the coachman.

Mr. Holmes—l hope, Sir there is an appeal from your
decision ; if so, I shall certainly resist the payment.
The clerk observed, that there was no appeal from a
decision under the Ilacknry-coach Art. • • • ' -- •- •
Coachman—Your Worship, I shall have to summon. the
parties before you again, for giving me 6d. less than my
fare.

Mr. Lewis—l think you will do right, coachman, from
the encouragement you have met with with to-day.
The damage was then paid for, and the parties retired.

MARLBOROUGH-STREET.—Yesterday a young
man of very respectable appearance, named James Penman,
,a native of Scotland, which was strongly evinced by his
dialect, was brought from the watch-house of St. Pancras
-parish, before Mr. RQZ; the sitting Magistrate, charged
by a hackney-wadi:inn with refusing to pay him his fare.

It appeared by the statement of the hackney-coachman,
that about 10 o'clock the night befure the defendant hired him
from his stand, and kept him driving about from one direction
to another for several hours, until at last he found that the
defendant bad no real destination whatever, and he therefore
drove him to the watch-house to secure the payment of the
fare. The unhappy young man, while standing at the bar,
and also as it appeared at the watch-house, betrayed by his
demeanour strong and evident symptoms of a very unset-
tled state of mind, and a respectable tradesnian in the
neighbourhood" of the office,' who attended for the purpose,
stated that he knee the young man very well, and knew
his friends in Scotland to be highly respectable, and that
they are very well known to the family of Lady Hampden,
but that the unhappy young man himself has been for some
time labouring under strong mental aberration, which, of
late, has grown to a degree of considerable excitement; and
if, he said, the Magistrate could have the defendant de-
tained until his friends could be communicated with, he
(the applicant) would undertake to write to them forth-
with, as he knew their address in Scotland.

Mr. Rots said, that there was sufficient grounds in what
the applicant alone had stated to detain' the young man
until his friends could be heard from ; but, 'at all events,
he could' he detained upon the charge of the ceachnian
until the amount of the fare (12s. 6d.) shoOld be paid,.and
which it was clear the young man himself, without some
aid•from others, could not pay, as he had not a farthing of
money about him. He was accordingly ordered to be de-
tained, until hiti friends shall be heard from, and every in e •
per care directed to be taken of him.
The, next charge immediately succeeding the last was
against a young man, of equally respectable appearance,
brought from the same watch-house, and also a native of
Scotland, named Thomas Foot, and, if possible, with a
stronger northern accent than his predecessor, and who
was evidently also in a very unsound state of mind, although
his malady seemed of a 'more subdued nature than that of
the other.

A watchman stated, that between three and four o'clock
on that morning, while the rain came down in torrents,
he met this young man walking on the Hampstead-road,
without either hat or coat on, and addressing a speech of
some sort, which he (the watchman) did not quite under-
stand, to the moon, and as he refused to explain or give
any account of himself, he thought it his (the watchman's)
duty to take him to the watch-house.
• An elderly respectable-looking female, residing in Union.
terrace, Hampstead-road,"stated, that this young man had
lodged in her house for nine months past, and there could
not be any where a more regular or well-conducted young
man in all his habits and manners, until about.a week ago,
at three o'clock in the morning, she .was disturbed .by
some one speaking very loud, in the garden, at the back
of the house, and wondering who it could possibly be, she
got out of. bed, and on looking through the window, she
saw that it was her lodger, who had • quitted his bed and
had gone into the garden, where he seemed to be looking
up, and talking something to the sky ; that circumstance,
however, passed away, believing it to be as she supposed
only a mere. frolic, and she thought no more of it until
Sunday night last, when he got up in a similar manner,
and about the same hour, and went out of the house alto-
gether, without his hat or coat, and she was now so
muck alarmed. by his conduct on those two occasions, that
no consideration should induce her to take him back again
to her house.

Mr. lloE asked her if she knew any thing of the young
man's friend ?—She replied that she din not, except that
she was satisfied they were respectable, because they sent
him plenty of money, for he regularly every three weeks
received by post a 61. note. Site always took in his letters,
awl the postage of each was !?,s. 10d.
Mr. Roe asked her if sbe knew the address of his
friends ?—She replied, that any letters that she had ever
taken charge of from him to be sent to the Post-office,
woe always addressed to " Hobert Foot, Esq. Glasgow."
311.. Roe now asked the young man himself, who scented
hitherto to be quite unconscious of what was going on in
his presence, if he had been brought up to any business or
profession, and what part of Scotland be was a native of.
—He replied, in a scarcely audible tone, and after a tie-
quert repetition of the question to him front the Magistrate,
that be was a native of Glasgow, and that he had been
brought up as a sculptor and modeller.
Mr. ROE ordered that this young man should be de-
tained also, as a disorderly person, and that proper care

'should be taken of him, until a communication should, 136
had from his friends in Scotland ; and he (Mr. Roe) tut
self would, be said, take upon him to address a letter "
Mr. Foot, of Glasgow, respecting him.
There was nearly 21. in money found upon the r;11/21
man's persdn, and Out of this it was directed that Nha
comforts he might require should be supplied him.
(c
A fashionable-looking young man, named Chadw
was charged with assaulting a Mr. Collins, residing us
Berners-street ; but on the investigation of the case, it aijf
peired dead). by the evidence that Mr. Collins bin le,
was The first aggressor, by seizing Mr. Chadwick hY,'h
.0,
collar, although Mr. Chadwick subsequently knocked I°,l
down ; audit further appeared that the whole arose out
a groundless charge of stealing a dog from him, wit!icer
Mr. Collins had made against Mr. Chadwick, and nn
these circumstances the Magistrates dismissed the affai";
The parties, however, had not got well clear outride the
office-door, u hen Mr. Collins thought proper to call
Chadwick a thief and a dog-stealer, and Mr. Chad
thought it quite as, proper to knock Mr. Collins 0O b
again with a blow of a stick, almost under the nose of the
Magistrate, before whom, of course, both parties oncel
more made their appearance, and Mr. Chadwick was O
31. for, the knock-down blow, although he said he thnugh'm e
some allowance ought to he made for his feelings when
was publicly called a thief and a dog-stealer.
Mr. ROE said, that these words might be punishableb:
civil action, hut were not to- be redressed by a blolr 01.
stick, and that, too, ahnest in the very eye of justice. 1
Mr. Chadwick instantly paid the 31. and said that I
Mr. Collins used similar language to hinragain, he (hicei
Chad Wick) would soon have to pay 31. more; but .heS
not much care, as it went to the King, and not to
Collins:

A man named Penni»ger, who stated himself to La's
been eleven years • an officer in his Majesty's service, 11°
who has lately become the landlord of one of the most nEr
toriously ill-conducted public-houses in London, coiled the
Maidenhead, in Llopkins-street, St. James's, appeared t° •
answer an information preferred against bins at the instal
of the parish-officers, for harbouring reputed thieves ou
other bad characters in his house.
The information was dismissed for want of evidence. t
Bnckland said that he could prove beyond. doubt,
on Sunday night laSt the landlord did know that be 0'
entertaining a thief in his house, and the Magistrll
ordered that a fresh information should be laid upon
new ground.
George Curtis,'who is in custody charged with obtOr
ing various articles of saddlery, harness, from trao4;
men in that line, under the false pretence that he' vis°
groom in the service of some gentleman.who dealt With
them,. was fully committed for trial upon three clear cad
established against him.

MARYLEBONE.—Yesterday morning the wife
tradesman, and her daughter-in- law, were .brought her
Mr. 'RA WLINSO N, on suspicion of felony, but' no positie
evidence being given against then, they were dischargew
UNION-HALL.—Yesterday John Priestley,the mote(
and owner of a fishing-smack, was brought up in custody
from Newington, in the watch-house of which parish be
had been confined during the night on a charge of havi4
violently assaulted his wife Rebecca.
The complainant's eyes bore ample proof of the usages"
had received, in addition to which she produced one of be,
side-teeth, which had been knocked out during the conflie';
Snow, the beadle of Newington, proceeded to state, the
on Sunday evening the inhabitants of South-street, Esst;
lane, Walworth, were extremely alarmed in consequence'
a riot and cries of " murder !" pnieeeding from a holei
in the street, occupied by a man named Davison.. 'SeVet,
persons endeavoured. to gain admittance, but could 07
until he (Snow) and some of the watchmen under 13'5
controul forced their way into the
.premises, where tbeY
say a woman lying on the floor bleeding very much frets
the nose and mouth. The defendant was in the roesl'
as also a man named Davison, who appeared to 111_,'e
been very much .beaten. Ott inquiring into the cs 7,
of the. disturbance the defendant, who seemed kil;11
exasperated at the time, described that his wife 114
abandoned her home and six children, and eloped
Davison, a carpenter, residing in South-street,.
took her home with him. Priestley having sours
his wife in vain for some time without weer*
length ascertained that she was.living with Davison,-sn
having met that man on ,Sunday, at. Deptford, he went C
to him, and having upbraided him for seducing The age°.
tions of Mrs. 'Priestley. declared that he was detetiniited
knowing her place of concealment, and threatened tai
every tooth Davison had in his head
.down his throat 011
refused to take hint that instant to where hia(PriestleP)
wife was living. Davison, terribly alarmed'at the 60'1
held out by Priestley, who was preparing te'avenge
on the seducer, at length reluctantly consented to becOr
his guide to the habitation he had taken for the unfortunate
A
woman.. The moment Priestley entered the room and ea f
his wife, his feelings, as Snow described, got the bete f:I
his judgment, and he commenced an attack bog) upon hrs
wife and the man who was the chief cause of her b°l.
ing abandoned her family. Priestley being a very pot',
ful man, soon tliuntplied over Davison, and laid
sprawling along the floor, from which he was unable 1';
rise fur none time. The wife of Priestley shared a SiMils4
fate, and her cries fur assistance brought the beadle s°,
his assistants to the house as above described. Snow sal
ed, that lie had every reason to believe the above staten3e°
to be correct.
Defendant.—l am exceedingly sorry for having lifted i°,
hand to my wife, but your worship, my passion got
better of me. he has treated me with great cruelty, hi
ing eloped with the same man about six months ago.
afterwards forgave her, and consented to take her hoo.ie'
notwithstanding what had happened. She conduete'
herself with propriety from that period until the Pre:,
sent occasion. Her having now abandoned her child 0131 j
six weeks old, irritated me so dreadfully, that upon
ing her, I certainly struck her, which I am 'no* heartil
sorry for. ,
Sonic affectionate glances here took pla'ee between 10;
Priestley and her husband, when the former exclaial
" I forgive him, if he forgives me. lam not afraid egos
he will heat me again, and I shall faithfully promise Pe
to deserve it."
Mr. CirAstenns then added that the case was discharged'

THE ARMY. .4

Sir John Byng,, the Commander-in-Chief of the For'
in Ireland; has-left Dublin, on a tour of inspection to lbe
South of Ireland.
The 21st Regiment:of Foot, embarked, on Saturdayi ft
Bristol, for Waterford.
The 9th Regiment of Infantry embarked, on Saturday'
at Liverpool, for Belfast.
A Detachment of the ,Coldstream Guards; arrived in,
Aylesbury on Friday. They are on their way to'
eliester, where it is presumed they are intended to repl2'(-
other corps detached from the latter place tti Ireland<
Bucks Chronicle.
A report is prevalent this evening, that orders have Wei,
received for the military here to be in readiness to ernba!A
fur Ireland, and that some of the steam-boats are engs
to be prepared for their transport,— Glasgow Courier.

BIRTHS.
On the 4th inst. Mrs. J. P. Clark, Sackville,stree4
Piccadilly, of a son.
On the 4th inst. in Hans-place, Mrs. Bruce, of
daughter.
On the 4th inst. at Painswiek House, Gloucestershire'
the lady of W. 11. Ilyett, Esq. a a daughter.
On the 6th inst. in Pull-mall East, Mrs. Robert Cuff
of a son.

MARRIED.
On the 4th inst. at St. Peter's Church, Walworth, by
the:Rev. Dr. Holloway, George J. Fabian, Esq. Lievt.f
R.N., to Ellen, (laughter of the late W. Bentham, E'4• v
Sheerness, Kent.

• DIED.
On the 17th of August, Thomas Pemberton, Esq. of
tb'
island of St. Christopher.
On the-Ist inst. ut Harrow, George Henry, aged
the youngest son of the Rev. B. Evans. •
On the 29th ult. at the Beacon, Exmouth, aged WI
months, Frederick Samuel, the infant bon of Lieutenant'
General Boye.
On•the 24th ult. Mr. Thomas Smith, Prince's-strPrince's-street'Spits!fields, aged 62, atter a severe illness of only tto°days. ,jtiriXlWs7l.l4 ft..;
- nth H. le, i°

On the sth inst. at Hampstead, Mr. Richard Nob'.
the 69th year of his age.
On the 3d inst. at Hammersmith, Madame Notre, aged te'
On the 4th inst. at Holloway, in the 29th year of et
age, Isabelk4 third daughter of John Thorn, Esq. of Ju
street, Brunswick-square.
At Brighton, on the 4th inst. Miss Emma 8r,617
hifr
second daughter of George Brettle, Esq. of Brixton' wr
Surrey, and Wood-street, London, in the 13th year of 't
age.
Oa the 4th inst. in her 9ed year, at her house in 12/r.,11.4,
wick-square, Mrs. Shaw, widow of Richard Shaw,- 51"
formerly of London-bridge. 191
On the 3d inst. at Kensington, the Rev. Mark C"11.
Fellow of Eminanuel College, .Cainhridge. • •

PAINTED and PVELISPIED by 111 UNDO YOUNG, ot
_ _ _

SUN Orrika, 112, STRA24Ii LONDON.

I

A."
%. •
L
tut 60,

The
aged ;
'ge purj
'ttoovet
vhich
Which
exPlainc
4011 N
It 4 to

Thisda
AN
Ak,
qt:LL

tc
It
Will mu
ter

t %tint]
on

;
.L.reatift,
4,itatt,
t'LtreLti

4'.lrgto4
busy,
end 4
twskt..,
FJ
u-AsAjtt

l °RN
Grant
4:TAVIS.
?_.eorgA
eharlvs
4oha
)3,

Two,
1 ill
it;
tAthea
A di
ajter
-peed c
w
cline
Rate
Panya
t6WIIB I

`~_
GA

at the r
Ponce e
sisarnari
karnan
ettrr,
tilton,
•
rerg,
meritaz
Allll

obta
Pou
Year

ourl3~ges,
%tree
Connoi
briver,

:terra
.3
kutchi
41:4,tre:i
ken,'

obta

cwt
tire t
12. 141
be
IV, Pe
‘ttot,
bablitt
tt reeti