The Sun.
London, England, 1845-01-29 00:00:00

THE BOURSE-MONDAY, JAN. 27.

First Highest Lowest Last
Pric,o. Price. Pries. Price.
Trench Five per Cents l2l 9.5 .. 121 95 .. 121 75 .. 121 75
Yours. • • 108 .. 108 108 .. ICB
Three per Cents •• 85 30 .. 85 30 .. 85 20 .. 85 20
New Loan •• •••• •• 86 45 .. 86 50 .. 86 45 .. 86 50
Bank of France ...3260 .•3260 .•9260 —3260

Gouin Bank, I,ooof. Shares • • 1045 —1045 .. 1085 ..1088
Belgian Bank .. • • • • • • • ..... 635 .. 63s 635 .. 635
B4o.g,ian Elves, 1840
1842 •••••••• 10614 .. 106% .. 10614 106%
Two-and-a-Half-- 62 10 .. 62 10 .. 62 10 .. 62 10
Spanish Threes
Passive 6F/a .. 6!‘ .. 6S) 6X4
Portuguese Five per Cents.. 59 .. 59;44 .. 59% .. 9%
Neapolitan• ....... •• • •• 99 .. 99 99 99
RAILWAY SHARER.
St. Germain ...•..• •.......1042 50 ..1042 50 ..1037 50 ..1037 50
Versailles, R. 8..... ..... 505 .. 505 .. 502 50 .. 502 50
L.B.•••••••••••• 383 385 .. 383 75 .. 2.83 75
Rouen 50 —1072 80 —1072 50 ..1072 50

Yong to Havre.. ..... •••,• 665 ..p567 50 .. 862 60 .. 667 50
Orleans ....•• ••••••••• ••1135 ..1137 50 ..1135 ..1133
bytrasburg to 8a1e.......... 306 2.5 .. 306 25 .. 306 2.5 .. 306 25

TRIUMPH OF M. GUIZOT.
PARIS, MONDAY EVENING.
CHAMBER OF DEPUTIES.
SITTING OF JAN. 27.

The Chamber of Deputies resumed the discussion
on the third paragraph, the amendment to which was
rejected by a show of hands on Saturday. After
some remarks from M. Billault, M. Garnier Page?,
and other Deputies, the ballot was proceeded with,
when there appeared—
For the original paragraph
Against it
Majority in its favour
VOTE ON THE ADDRESS.

After the vote adopting the third paragraph, by
213 to 205, the Chamber proceeded to the discussion
of the remaining paragraphs of the Address. To
the fourth paragraph M. Cremieux proposed an
amendment, which he immediately withdrew.
The fifth and sixth paragraphs were next adopted
without opposition, M. Vivien having declined
to move tha amendment of which he had given
notice. The seventh paragraph being called on,
M. St. Priest withdrew the amendment. The
remaining paragraphs were then adopted without
opposition. The nominal appeal was then made,
when the greater part of the Left declared they
would abstain from voting. The ballot having been
taken, there appeared—

For the Address
Against it
Majority for the Address .. —lB3

The Bourse on Monday retained all its firmness ;
Three per Cents. closing at 85f. 35c., and Five per
Cents. for 121 f. 85c., for the end of the month.

THIS DAY'S NEWS.

CHANCERY.--{THIS DAY.)
(Before the LORD CHANCELLOR.)
His Lordship was engaged during the morning with
the further hearing of a part heard patent case of " Tul-
loch v. Hartley."

,QUEEN'S BENCH.—(THIS DAY.)
(Sittings in Banco.)
THE QUEEN V. CARTER.

The SOLICITOR-GENERAL moved for the judgment of
the Cuurt upon the prisoner, who pleaded guilty to two
indictments preferred against him for misdemeanour.
The prisoner was an officer of excise, and was stationed
in Montgomer) shire, in Wales, where, in his capacity of
excise officer, ho committed a series of frauds in the
years 1842 and 1843. It was the duty of the prisoner to
give notice to traders of the amount of duty with which
they were to be charged, but he had no right
to receive any money. Having to deal with
persons who were ignorant in those matters, and
who were not able to speak the English language,
he obtained from them more duty than they ought to
pay. He also received money for licenses, which he
falsified, by giving the parties old licenses which be had
in his possession, insertiug the names of the persons
from whom ho received the money. He was guilty,
therefore, of forgery, which he committed for the pur-
pose of covering his fraud, which might have subjected
the parties upon whom he practised it to great inconve-
nience and expense. It was only after the prisoner had
lost his situation that those circumstances became known.
It was evident that the prisoner had pursued this as a
system, for he had been guilty of a series of offences of
the same kind.

Mr. Justice PATTESON —I find that there are some of
the offences set forth in various counts. As I cannot
pass
s a u
j ud
igtren
pt r
ou
speognu i moreupon
the
thanon e, I suppose you will
enter
others?
The Solicitor- General remained silent for some time.
Lord DENM W AN—ell, Mr. Solicitor, what do you
propose to do?
The SOLICITOR-GENERAL—I cannot do so, my Lord;
I am not the Attorney-General
Lord DENNAN—Oh yes, you can. You are acting
for the Attorney-General in his absence.
The SOLICITOR-GENERAL —I cannot do so in my own
name.

The Court having consulted for some time,
Lord DENMAN directed that the prisoner should be
brought up again to-morrow, and in the meantime they
would consider what was to he done.

BAIL COURT.—(THIS DAY.)
(Sittings in Banco.)

LORD GIFFORD V. THE MAGISTRATES OF BERKSHIRE.

Mr. SMITH moved for a rule to show cause why a writ
of certiorari should be issued removing certain reeog-
nisances entered into by Lord Gifford and two sureties,
before the Earl of Radnor and the Rev. John Francis
Cleaver, two of the magistrates of Berkshire, into the
Court of Queen's Bench. He founded his application
on two grounds —first, that no sworn peer of the realm
could be arrested by a warrant issued by the magistrates
of a county ; and secondly, that his Lordship had an
undoubted right to remove the allegations against him
to the Court of Queen's Bench, as the only Court
having jurisdiction in the case of a peer. The Learned
Counsel supported his view of the case by a reference to
Blackstone, and to the authorities quoted by him.
Mr. PasuLEy said that he was prepared to show that
the Commission of the Peace authorised the magistrate
to issue his warrant against all who were supposed to
contemplate a breach of the peace, and peers, he con-
tended, were not exempted from its operation ; and he
was also prepared to show that the circumstances of the
present case warranted such interference ; and that,
therefore, that Court, in the exercise of a
wise discretion, should not accede to the rule
sought for by his Learned Friend. The circumstances
of the case were these. The Noble Lord kept a pack of
fox hounds with which he hunted the county of Berks,
and another gentleman, Thomas Thornhill Morland,
Esq., also kept a pack and hunted the same county.
They both claimed the privilege of drawing the Buscot
covers, the first on account of some acknowledged right,
and the second by permission of the owner, Pryce Pryce,
Esq., M.P. This misunderstanding produced a corre-
spondence between the parties which only widened the
gap, until at length tile intention of both parties to meet
with their friends at the cover in question seemed to
the magistrates to justify them in issuing their
warrant in order to prevent any aggression
on either side. The warrant was directed to Lord Gif-
ford, and was served upon him by a constable at his re-
sidence, in Cirencester, two days before the intended
meeting. His Lordship, attended by two friends,
Frederick Cripps, Esq., and Captain Jones, appeared
before the magistrates, and were bound over in the sum
of I.OOOL, and two 500/. That this was a necessary
measure, would appear from the remark made by Cap-
tain Jones to the constable who had pointed out to him
the Buscot cover, " Ah, that was where the horse-whip-
ping was to have:taken place," and Lord Gifford said,
when the constable expressed a hope that
his waiting upon him on so unpleasant a business
would be excused, "Oh, certainly, I thought it was
some one 'to call me out.'" The Learned Counsel then
at great length proceeded to quote authorities in oppo-
sition to the principle of Mr. Smith.
Mr. Justice WILLIAMS did not see why the Court
should interfere, because, in the first place, the Noble
Lord was not then in custody; and, secondly, if it should
be at any future time shown that the county magistrates
had no jurisdiction in such a case, the recognistuices
would fall to the ground.—Rule refused.

EXCHEQUER.-(T HIS DAY.)
(Sittings in Banco.)
The Court was engaged this morning in hearing mo-
tions, but as the points on which the decision turned
wero of a technical character, there was nothing to
justify a report.

MIDDLESEX SESSIONS.
(Before the ASSISTANT-JUDGE.)
Three females, named Ann Bachley, Nary Kirwan, and
Eliza Kent, were indicted for stealing a valuable watch,
the property of Donald Campbell Dawson.
Mr. Clarkson defended the two prisoners Kirwan and
Kent ; and Mr. Page appeared for the prisoner Ann
Buckley.
It appeared from the evidence of the prosecutor, who
was a wine and spirit merchant in Limehouse, that as he
was passing through Rosemary-lane, on the evening of
the 17th inst., one of the prisoners walked up to him,
and, laying her hand upon his arm, gave a signal, when
the other two women came up, and they commenced
hustling him. lle endeavoured to get away from them,
and having succeeded with some difficulty, he found
that his watch-guard had been cut, and his watch taken