The Sun.
London, England, 1826-06-09 00:00:00

[REPREfiIENTATIVRA

In another part of the Paper will be found a letter
from I.,",igypt,, on the eubject of the young persons PO
from that country.foreducation in France. We think
that our attention has not been drawn to that part of
the world in a manner adequate to importance.
The French Ministry, or their sub Ordinate agents, sic
fully impressed with the importance of Egypt, which
has now, almost for the first time since the days of
Cambysce, chance of distinguishing itself as esepa-
rate Power. Under the Government of its present
ruler, whose ideas seem Well calculated for making the
prosperity of any, =until hogoverna (always
exceptingihislingaging in a molest war to oblige st
potentate whose,, authority he might' to Shako ofil,
it has mark advaneei in civilittition'' which Would
be iwohi.shilig to all who were not Aware of. hix,
exertions. Alfred, or Peter, the Greateor-any other
Prince of the Caine kind, never dithinorelowards
improving the intellect of the kingdOiriii
they ruled than Mahommed —Paella has done for
Egypt. We should be sorry that Prates, byiiity means, .
'hostile or :'pacific, obtained a solid footing there:
That the ambition of all the Governments, legitirosie
or ilhigitimate, which have Wolin. France, has been
direoid to the conquest of the kingdom of!: the
Pharaohs, so evident, that there is no need in di
lating on Buonaparte, ur hie full tide of popularity,.
as conqueror of Italy, was sent there ; and long after
he had seized on the throne, the colonization of that
country, was a favourite subject .of speculation. Sir
Robert Wilson,, who* in his work . on Egypt, had
convicted Buonaparte,of poisoning and massacre, .some
years Afterwards; when fie was (regraded from the va-
rious titles which the ginljtlii of pretension had oh.
Wiled for him, wrote a .very: agreeable, though rather
inaccurate volume, to prove that we ware most vulne-
rable In our Indian dominions through that side ;. end,
with a degree of kindness and loyalty to ,his country that
ought. never to be forgotten to that admirable oftwer.
pointed out the wily through it to the destruction of pur
Oriental empire,: We do not participate
wowed to
tee.lll'
~IC
with which the gallant 'Exnight en owed to in-,
hire the holders of India Stock, particularly as we
to have no Very great opinion of 4opvir
ledge Kan), thing connected with warlike operations;
nor &Owe wish that, Mr. Brougham's honest proposi'
lion, which he has developed so ingeniously in his
Esin,tY an (the same book in which
,
he's° gn"tmuslY, recommends. the use ,of lash for
Ner 40.0
,That ~ 'Out Egypt :-should be .seised bY' the-
English , Government', should carried
tipn ; but we do most seriously desire, that every
should be made to, eultivg
oie the. intoLexecu-
oou aitentions whieh
the I entertains d towar us ; and to keep.
French from getting. the' itdvantago own tur in 4he,ef-
factions of the people of that country. Our Ministry
may depend upon it that there ie such a thing as being
too liberal.

LAW INTELLIGENCE.

, •
COURT OF CHANCERY, Jrl e.
etsuor or Lownon v. iinsitaosovaw.
Hie Lownswir mentioned this owe, respecting the election of a
Minister to Celeman-street Chtler,lh tiprin the potent state of
the record, he felt altogether unable to decide the rights of the
partiel; but his present opinion Wei, that the last election, now
comp ined of, was not * eketiem4 Alit is, that it was not
an efection by which the trustee' conkt bound; The record
stated three classes of persons as qualified to vote, namely, persons
paying ehureh and poor rate* only, !nut persons paying neither, but
being householders ; but upon the evidence it was quite out of his
Lordship's power to say who the perties were that had the legal right
,to vote. Ilia Lordship will, hoiveyer, looii through the'papers
again, and dispOse of it on Monalymornimp
IN THE IiATTIER or sir oannony ripe Tunwee.
Mr, Eleteniveit. said, the minute; of his Lordship's orders in
this Matter had been handed out by the Registrar, but that there
,were partner the order:left out which which- very impoitant,,
and t4ereferivir• Was inetruooll!° :PkPT 'wt.' harp men'
toned again din Saturday
, His Loimseal had no objection sq allow it to bespoken to by
Mr. insOwtit.
Mr. .811SAILDWeLL was not certain that be would be the Counsel
(chosen for the purpose of mentionititit, but it would he mention-
ed, by softie one in the matter if the. Court would permit, ,
Ili" Lopnaitir granted leave. ,
LUSTACY.
+ the petitions in .iuntey had 'accumulated
to such an: immense number, ,that he 'nr***"--!,1, as as set of neces-
sity, to appoint one or two days, between the last day of ,Term,
and the First geal, for the purpose of baring those petitions.
vice ottanCat LOi'auIUISIVSICTIQS.
• A part heard case was mentioned, which gave rise to the fol-
lowing obiervatiOns
Loanswir wished to know, how it cams to pass, that the
Vice-Chancellor made orders, discharging from orders of com-
mittal made by the Chancellor.
,Mr. HART thought it would be dittcul,t.to make out thit His
Houor had any such authority.
Lonnsair knew that such orders,, orAt leut that such an
order, huh, been roads by the Court below. .
Mr, WAFSTIRLD was aware of this too, but he oleo knew that
hie Hononr had now laid dowp a rule that he would not hear any
!notions in future, to'diseharge front the committals of the than-

Losysfil? wae,.of Ppinini that thin Was a very proper rule.
For his own part, he never committed, for a breach of an order
marls by the Viee-Chaueellor, without first reading moat carefully
every word of affidavit that had been before the Court below.

COURT OF KING'S BENCH, Jove 8.
glad. ri eayeet.tintowi,lFSCl. . -
The A.170.,Nrr-Onace RAT, on Wulf of,the Cmumiseioners. for.
paving a port of the parish of St. Pancras, moved for a rule collies
on Mr, floWlinion, one of the- magistrates Of the,cOuritY of Middle-
sex, toShow fans! why a mandamus should not issue, command-
ing him to hear and determine an information against .certain in-
dividuals who; bed refused try remove an obstruction in the high-
way, caused by a stand of hackney-roaches, in Howland-street,
Fiteroy-Aquare. Under the metropolitan paving aft, the commis-
sioners are antlierized to remove obstructions in the highways,
arid eipeeially such stands of. haekney-coaChes 'as might be found
inconvenient. Repeated ;00111000e haVing been spade of this 91)-
,struotione
;and accidents °copiloted by the ,pneonvTnensitistion
of the coach-stand ingtiestion, the eemrnietioners ordered it to
his ren oved to Tottenham.:court4oed, 'a distance of about' ifni
yards fromits original site, but the owners of the cOeihee and
coachmin hnving refuted to 'comply, and persistea ort;taking. their
stood there on fore:ar, informationyna 144 against: t)son 44.
recover the penalties directed by, tbeeet o(Periiiment,to,beliviid,
on persons tonna guilty of such offences.: The white having
been summoned before -Mr. 'Riwlinstin, -one of the poliCe-magis,-
trates;and oleos commisainner. under the Paving Act, that gentli4'
man conceiving that ha had no jurisdiction, declined deciding on
the question. .The present application was, therefore, to enforre!.
the previsions of the Act of Parliament on the subject, on whieli
the ',tented Counsel contended the Magistrates were antliorized"tO
dettide......-Rtile granted.
, .COURT. OF 4:IOMMON,PI•EASt 4oPs
ror v• patimts,, ,t
itidieinitilivit..int hi this ease obtained, to,siserar
caw NOW a, new trial elmiad not be ivanted,; cot thegronn 'that the
jury bad been. unduly biassed in finding a verdiet for the pleititiff,
from peculiar circumstance, which were involved in the consi-
deration.
Lord Chief Justice Besr read his !voila the tritd,which, took
place before him in Coildhall. Minot twelve menthe ago, Messrs,
Stone and do. had lost several _Sank of Englind notes, and they
were duly advertised accordingly. Four of these note. for SO!.
each tied been,
,after an interval of several months, paid into
another banking-house, and two of them, were ,traced to the de-
ftruient Sadler, who was a atabyirheeper,in fitJsfNrti, and who said
be hod' either received them from his bloke,- or taken them in
payment of bets at the lest Doncaster rtifee,.: It was proved that
Ite.hadi not °Witted Mein it 'hist`bankers,. and there was only his
own fieelaratims. thatithayluul 4Pnigrinto hi. poittaalin • at Doe-
mtter., Lerefehiplititiek it tot Ihe .lary. to say, whether the
thritip,i, )110 ,Irtri .07-ArtW oion leSo4o..bY.law thing
juitiseo that value an they Stnittund for the pleintift,
sero6ewit,o2, in inpi3nr,'Ot'llia rue ur ed~ that the
same cautionwhich wee regmr.tl J a Wadeatian'at has er~unter,
na,etad the harry *of
ought not to be rry a We
, course, where the party had lawfully gone, in ponlyme of his
.WlllOll is, denier horses. He made this remark. in Louse-
queues; of `its being. acid that the banl,;;,notea having been yeeeired
,nut of on illegal tranaaction (betting),' bad not properly come into
the defendant's possession.
The Coort granted `the new trial on the terms, that the de-
reliant should pay the costs of the: applieation, as 1,4 as the
amount of the verdiet, into Court.

INSOLVENT pF,llTOlitzi' (OMIT 11•Nr
George ituoigui Loiv, of thy Sjrvice,
viitie lip to be heard on his petitioii to be discharged.
It will be reeolleeted that the insolvent was before the'CitUrt
the 2d inst. And was reminded in order, tp have the evidence of a
Mr. Cake, to show how the horse sold to the Colonel was die-,
posed of. Mr, Cooki opposed the insolvent, on the grounds that
he, had obtained the botie by katOkivit reprstentatiort,from Mr..
Cox; a respectable horse-limier if Btatnford..mt. Blackfrtar'i-road.
Me. Jobor Cele', Who; the Colonel said, had sold'tlia hb ee and.
:etteived tlte prpceedi, was in attendance, and wai examined by
Mr. Iteextt. He iteted that he had been residing at the Colonel's
house et Peckham in the early part of thiftystri about that time
Mrs. Low raped 403
02Aims the horse at the Bazaar in his
own name, for the purpose of being sold. .-:lle,cpttittpted to,do no.
The horse was taken there, but after that tie karvoiiiii4re ahem
it, whither 4.61 beets jolt or ' - • 4 1-7
_

Crop-exerninid. by Mr, cooxE„,r-;lie was living two or three
months at the colseql'e. He could, not say the exact time he
went theta, .or when ha lefilt to go in the New-roan . lie
arrested the insolvent *bout a month 44er he returned to town,
for a debt of 101., which was contracted for services which he
had performed foihim when ha was employed as his agent. He
went nut with him to Honduras in 44 ahnvO rapacity, and after
remaining there sin or seven monthly, returned to tin* topiary, ;
as the Colonel owed him a bslanee of 401. he went to boort!. And
Ledge at hie Moat:, in order to lessen the debt. Whin Witness
naked the insolvent for some money, he said it was out of his
power ,pay him, -unless he to* a bill for two month', forloi.,
the halense then due to him, Witness consented to t4e, 1,11.1,4'1
twptenes, and paid the hill to a third potion ; it WAN, newever,
dishonoured whin it heeante due.
Mr. 0101Cz.—And although you were confidential agent to the
Colonel, you- induced, him to ore you * hill for tho.lol.
Witnees.r-i ttnd I should tuty• o:44P4,43AucilYttli* 4 Y9n
had owed me any nioney.
Mr.
itnrintelYthdaeit in
enocllt.-.-And you really arrest
and if, the law allowed
Witness-1 did, and Imweo.t....tid(Ae r twYgtt; f ehrorte
was
wanting vt:ithC°l°l4,l 14w, l/Ohfi.l3,l44kfritekold, two or
three ,dayalstifore 1k u7th of , lanulxryi>Colonel kid hewn
very lilt icnen 'atone tunsbernr!.#lltP',li9d.- 'When he
was in town, he used to go into the City by the alaiit and I mused
!nice& beat with him towards the di& of the' evening. He
knows why I arreetrol him, and where twaitcs he found. if any
persone.
ck
h iche,
toriserble:swrea:Pnhaind;en tteibilt
sold
.Berke,
ant
nnte oefwn thes sttthhh net. told:
dt
HorsesO, inh6 1 If
; 1/41414"kra:;'2ei4:141:4-'FlTbS.st"."4otnitieed .
knew
we'
the hand-writing in,The 40(31111WD;
jpii:rodw‘ie:tt t°6ttrPare°tve:ishfrentilthnef
books • 'licit 'paid to Col. Low himself 181. the helenr4;whicli
remain after tha pe,,ece attending the hors,. A
stunt tilde „
tihl. wee advanced on tilt hovee,
but he could not eay.whether it was paid to the Colonel iiii`lt44llllY,
an ha had notes Wanton:- 'The slim Wit not posted whiir the
C9lso.ll'll.lltTethisaAejence of Isl. Witness followed the knob.
an is
into ihttrjnitry, and on .tqling 4ifEktlic tiratmlanlClrt
immediately paid the 2,51." - The te. 3d. charged in the ac-
count for shoeing it horse, No. 171, rekrred to another horse
which belonged to the Colonel, and WAS brought there in the name

TTI

of Mr. Cake. Ha could not. say whether it was.sold or not; but '
he could ascertain that fact by referring to the books.
Mr. Herrn 'contended-that there Was no proof that his client
had received the 251. alluded to by the last witness, or that he
knew. any thing of the advance ; with respect to the 181. it must
be admitted that he received P but that eircumetanee might have
escaped his memory.
The Cut Coststrautonte said, that it must be presumedlhat
he received the 251. from the very circumstance of his refunding
the above sum the moment the account was presented to him by
Mr. Burke.
Mr. COOKE said, that it was quite clear from the evidence ad-
duced, that what the insolvent wort and repeated respecting the
horse: was untrue. He swore that the , horse was sold by Mr.
Caice, and that the money was paid to the seine person ; that he
'(the Colonel) did not.get a andling,by,the trentaction. How:was
it possible that, e could forget receiving 431.. and paying back 25/.
out of it ? These were not everyday occurrences, nor had any length
. of time slapped so that his memory could be so weak on tbeee points ;.
there wu also another horse mentioned in the account, and it was
strange.,,that although it belonged to the. Colonel, it 'Was senile
r the Bazaar in the name of M. Caice but it did not appear
whether it ,was sold or not. Low wi as good a name is Caice,
if. the transaction, bed not some mystery in it; but he could ex-
plain the matter. The Colonel was probably afraid that Mr.
Cox, who from the nature of his business knew a good deal of the
Bazaar, might .find put that. the horse. was there if the ineolvent
lied made use of his own name. Considering all the facts de-
luded iu, ,evidencet .it spO4ntiKl to .hirnlbata the insolvent was
by no means entitled to be discharged under the benefit of the

The Cnt r CAltsttilllnOSZA mid, that if it depended. upon the
Court's decision to which side credit was given, with respect to the
insolvent's being seen in Blackfriaerwroad on Jan. 31, he should say
(notwithstanding the conflicting testimony) that Mr. Cox's evi-
dence was entitled to credence? for although he might have made
a mistake of a day, one way or the other, there was no doubt but
he saw the insolvent there about the time stated, although the
latter hail sworn to the contrary. But the case did not require
to be decided on that point, for supposing Mr. Cox had not-seen
him the main question war, had he -or.had he not fraudulently,
and by false pretences, obtained, credit for. hors from, the op,.
posing creditor ? and never was there a ease, of rnoregrois and
premeditated trend than that committed by the insolvent in the
pretreat, instance ; he had an opportunity of producing evidence to.
remove the unfavourable imprespion ,on the minds of the Cont.
It would 'be 'wasting words to mike any farther remark upon a
ease so 'obviously elm .and distinct; be should therefore make
only one more observation, before Being judgment, , which
that this Colonel or General, whichever he mightbe, Was cot a
Colonel or a General in the English army.' The judgment 'Of the
Court was,' that the insolvent shell not, receive any benefit or
advantage from the Act, until he obeli have been confined eight
calendar months, from -the date of his petition, within the walla
Of the prison, for fraudulently contenting a debt with the oPPcm-
ing creditor.