The Sun.
London, England, 1819-01-20 00:00:00

MANCHESTER, JAN. 19.

The anonymous advertisement by which the
Public Meeting of yesterday was called, stated,
that the Chair would be taken precisely at 11
o'clock, but Mister HUNT was too well practised
not to be fully aware that expectation generates
consequence, and was too great a man to be punc-
tual. In the postscript to his Letter, in answer
to the invitation which was sent to him from this
town, he gave notice that he should sleep at
Stockport on Sunday evening, and proceed from
thence on Monday morning—the hint was taken—
and a party with flags and music met the Orator
and took the horses from his carriage. A little
before twelve o'clock the Republican Procession
came down Market-street ; it consisted of three
men hearing flags with inscriptions. The first,
we understand, was the property of the " man
from Bristol," it was red, with gold letters,
on one side the words " Hunt and Liberty,"
and on the other side, " Universal Suffrage."
It was mounted on a red staff, which was stir-
mounted with the red cap of Liberty !--The other
flags were white ; on'e of them was inscribed
" No Corn Laws," and on the other " Rights
of Man." These were followed by a Band of
Music, and immediately after came the silly People
who drew the Barouche, in which stood, waving his
hat, the so often-rejected Candidate for a seat in the
House he has so much libelled.—Three other
persons (whose 'names we could not learn) were
in the carriage with him, but it was impossible
to mistake the Hero of the Day. When the Pro-
cession arrived at the Exchange the carriage
stopped at the front door, and the Orator
wished to have given " a spice of his qua-
lity," by making an harangue to the Sub-
scribers to the News-Room, who were look-
ing at the " most impudent Man living,"
from the windows and doors. But the moment
he opened his mouth he was saluted with every
mark of indignant contempt, and he was obliged
to give up his intention, for the hisses and groans of
the Gentlemen whom he wished to become his
auditors drowned even his Stentorian Powers,
and his Myrmidons moved onward with, their
precious load through St. Mary's Gate, and
Dean's Gate (for exhibition was the way to
gather the Idle at least, to swell the num-
bers of the Meeting) to the Hustings (if so the
scaffolding may be called), which was erected on
the ground near St. Peter's Church, now rented
for exercise by the Manchester and Salford Yeo-
manry Cavalry.
[We are obliged to defer the particulars of the
Meeting till to-morrow.]

Before we conclude this article, it is a justice owing'to the
lower classes of the town of Manchester to say, that except-
ing during the dinner hour, between twelve and one o'clock,
and excepting a few women and children allured by the no-
velty of the scene, the greatest proportion of persons of that
description who attended were evidently from a distance and
from the country, led to the town by the influence of the ad-
vertisement,which had been industriously circulated. At noon
there were present at least ten thousand persons, but a very
considerable proportion were drawn to the place entirely by
curiosity; and that the general feeling was not with the leaders
of the spectacle, full proof was given, by at least two-thirds
of the persons present setting up a shout of satisfac..
tion, on the fall of the hustings.*=(The Exchange Hera(d,
la ItChester.)

* The Hustings fell in the course of the proceedings, and
the Orators and their Friends were lodged us the mud, but
no serious injury occurred.

JACOBINICAL MEETING.

There was yesterday a dinner Festival at the
Crown and Anchor, held by the friends of Radi4
cal Reform, in order to 'celebrate the recent issue
of an action brought by FRANCIS WARD, against
the Proprietor of TFIR OBSERVER, Weekly Paper,
in which the latter was cast in damages to the
amount of 6001. A person named LB MAITRB
was called to the Chair. The proceedings of this
Meeting were so like all the factious assemblies of
the same kind, that it is only necessary to notice
the first of the toasts, in order to give the public
a correct notio❑ of the complexion of the company.
"The Sovereigntyof tl►e people—the King emanate
ing from that Sovereignty; and may its power be se-
.cured by a Radical Reform." It is evident that if the
object of this democratical toast could be carried
into effect, there would be an end to all Sove-
reignty but that of an overwhelming MOB, to the
destruction of every thing sacred in Society. It
is not improper to notice that one of the Speakers,
GROSVBNOR HANSON, denied the merit of WARD,
and declared that be only deserved the honour
which had been unjustly given to the former.

Yesterday, at three o'clock, a Cabinet' Council
was held at the Foreign Office, which was at-
tended by the Earl of Harrowby, Earl of West-
morland, Earl of Liverpool, the Chancellor of.
the Exchequer, Viscount Sidmouth, Viscount
Castlereagh, Earl Bathurst, Viscount Melville,
Mr. Canning, the Duke of Wellington, Mr. C. B.
Bathurst, Mr.W.W. Pole, Mr. Robinson, and Earl
Mu!grave. The Cabinet Ministers continued is
deliberation till five o'clock.

FOR THE SUN.

LYSOL PENT DEBTORS' "JCT.

ANALYSIS AND CONIMENTAItY,
(Continued.)

The notice to be given to the detaining Credi-
tors, by service of the Debtors' petition and sche-
dule, with the order of Court, 20 days before the
examination, is a cautionary regulation, which
merks the equity of the statute, as a distinctive
meet's of enabling such Creditors to ascertain the
veracity of the statement ; and the notice given
to the other Creditors, referring them to an in•
spection of such petition and schedule, is evidence
of the same legislative care. And, as a !Luther
protection to Creditors, it is observable, that if
the Debtor does not appear to "be examined pur-
suant .to his- notice, he cannot afterward, be
brought tip to be heard, without havineg giver' the
like notice at least six months previous to the time
of examination. This provision is made by the
dependent Statute 56 Geo. 111. c. 102. sec. 6.
aild has prevented the recurrence of abuses which
had pre,iously resulted trout Debtors' giviog 20
dlek' netiee, and not appearing to be examined
pursuant thereto, whereby Creditors werjeotne-
Jietes put to intieh inconvenience and unnece,sary
teepeuce i and it was intended to check the evils
which have resulted from recourse tO removals by
flabf.as from the country prisons to the prisons
in London. Rut as the original Act limited Once
months' imprisonment as tine preliminary period
ref application, it may without offence be ques-
tioned, whether this additional term of six months
is not severe, as a protracted penalty to inadver-
tence or neglect ou the part of the Debtor, and
an injury to ti,e Creditor, by an additional expen-
diture et the Debtor's means, and particularly as
there is a clause inn the original Act, which pro-
vides against relief being granted to a prisoner
wino has wilfully remitted in custody. and con-
sumed his property, instead ,of applying it to the
discharge of his debts.
As a prwection to Creditors residing abroad,
and who could not be duly apprized by the notice
of 20 days, it is wisely provided, that it a prisoner
who has resided abroad within two years be-
fore shall seek the benefit of the Act, lie shall not
be discharged without the consent of such Credi•
tors, unless actually in custody, or seed for their
debts : and, Upon the day appointed for hearing
the prisoner, any Creditor, whether minted in the
schedule or not, may oppose the application for
relief, and put such • questions to the prisoner as
the Court shall think tit, and the prisoner shall
answer them upon oath, whereupon the Court is
to decide whether or not the prisoner is entitled
to the benefit of the Act, and in case of doubt,
may remand the prisoner for further examination.
Persons claiming to be Creditors, but not
named in the pt isoner's schedule, may he added
thereto at the time of hearing, and auy omission
or en err in the schedule may be supplied or cor-
rected : anti in case the Court is of opinion that
the prisoner is entitled to the benefit of the Act,
having first taken the oath prescribed, it shall so
order anti adjudee him entitled, and shall in such
order specify the several persons against whose
dematide the prisoner shall be deemed by the
Court entitled to be discharged by virtue of the
Act. It is here observable, that, by the- Statute
54 Geo. 111. ch. 23. sec. 7. iustead of specifying
tine several Creditors, in tine order of adjudication,

it shall be sufficient in sucl► order, to refer to the
priso►►er's schedule for suei► specification, and tl►e
prisoner is only discharged as to such scheduled

Creditors.

Atter the prisoner has been adjudged entitled to
relief under tl►e Act, he executes an assignment of
all his estate and effects of every description for
the benefit of his Creditors, excepting to the
amount of 201. for necessaries. He is then
sworn to the truth of his schedule, and enters
iu►o a recognizance to pay so much of the just
debts and demands against him as shall not be
paid out of the property assigned. This recog-

nizance is in the nature of a judgment to be pu

in suit against the Debtor and his future effeCts

The Debtor, therefore, is not discharged from his
under this Act of Parliament, until the
whose of his debts shall be fully paid and satis.

fled : and if the estate and effects Of the prisoner
so assigned, or together with his totore estate
and effects, are so considerable as to render it fit

that interest should be allowed on the debts, the
Court has also a power to order interest to
be paid. Considering fairly Ole operation of

the Act, therefore, as to the Debtor, it wil

not he fouud so favourable to Mira► as the Bank-

rapt Law, which exempts future p-roperty on
obtaining the certificate of conformity. And
although many persons have pronounced the In-
solvent Act as partial towards the Debtor, and
unjust towards the Creditors, it is manifest, that

tie lundship in this particular, at least, is most
upon the Debtor. And a kn`owledge of its upe-

ration has probably Wore(' cautionary conduct

against Inc:lrving n liability which
.would check

inditstrioUs efforts, since noone would exert him-

self so cheertolly for others, as he %rook; in con-
temphtion of reaping the foil benefits of his own

industry.
'rise enactments which provide for the exarni-
bations of Dk:bt ors (iu county prisons) before the

Justices of Peace at Sessions, direct that cer[ifi-

chtes Of such examination, and of the prelimi-
nary as well as incidental proceedings before-

thentiored, shall be transmitted to the Court, and

that such Court shall proceed upon such cerrifi-
caTe as to such Court shall seem just. Although

such examination before. the Justices may not in

the opia;io❑ of the Cre►litors be so satisfactory
eis if taken before the Court, there is ample pro-
vision for the removal of objections on th►at head,

by the cootrooling power %A:l)Fcb the Court pos-

•
sesse3 to annul or— confirm the certificate of the

Nagistrates, as to such Court shall seem just.—

And this confront has general!), been exercised
with due and ditigcnt discretion, the Court keep-

ing in view the rights of Creditors end the relief

intended for Debtors, either of whotu has a right

of appeal to the Court it the Certificate of the
Magistrates should be tinsatisfactory, the decision
Of the Court alone being
In the original ,Act it was provided that one of
the Judi es of his Majesty's Cunrt of King's

ketich, Cult:moll Picas., or Exclitriticr,

pre;ide in a Coutt of Appeal, to acciLle oil ail ap-
peals from Orders made by the Court constituted
try ihe Act, and to affirm, reverse, or alter such
orders ; but this appellate jurisdiction is at an
end, by virtue of the 54tl► (ieo. 111. i and it
will probably be contended that the administra-
tion of the statute has been' more satisfactory in
Its general effects, than it such Court of Appeal
had continued, inasmuch as disappointment or
discontent might have frequently produced liti-
gation and the expences. incidental thereto, with
little probability of reconciling both parties to the
justice of a decision on such appeal.
In proceeding through the origin:ll Act a very
important clause strikes me as affording protec-
tion to the immediate and contingent interests of
the Debtor, and is a strong counterpoise in the
scale of estimation with his liability to pay out of
his furore estate and effects ; an:l as many of
your Readers ni,y not have been fully acquainted
with this provision, the outline is here sub-
mit ted :

S. H. Whereby,after reciting that Debtors may be entitled
to annuities, or uncertain interests, Or to property Under
Pticb circumstances that the immediate sale thereof fur pay-
ment of their debts may be piejudicial to them, and deprive
them of the means of subsistence which they aright other-
wi,e have alter payment of their debts ; it is en:icted, That
in all such cases the Court shall take into consideration all
circumstances affecting such property ; and if it shall appear
reasonable to make any special order thereon, it shall be
lawful for the Court so to do, and to direct in what manner
such property shall be managed for the benefit of the Cre-
ditors, until the same can be properly sold, or until payment
of all the Creditors ; and to make such order touching the
sale or disposiiou of such property as the Court shall deem
reasonable, considering the rights of the Creditors and the
future benefit of the Prisoner after payment of his debts,
anti upon such terms as to the Court shall seem:inst. And if
it shall appear to the Court that the debts of the prisoner can
be di-ch;ur;;ed by means of money raised by way of mortgage,
instead of sale, the Court may so order, and may generally
direct all things which may lie propet for discharging such
Prisoner's debts in the manner most consistent with the in-

terests of the Prisoner iu any surplus of his effects after pay-
went of such debts.

'lbis Unquestionably appears a most salutary
clause for tl►e protection of those interests which
might otherwise he greatly endangered by the hash y
and inconsiderate determination of persons who
plunge themselves as it were into the vortex of in-
solvency to escape the harassing perplexities of
vindictive or ill-advised suits, and who are too
easily persuaded by interested persons to seek re-
lief under the Statute, when there is no manifest
necessity for such recourse. Altlrough it is much
to be feared that the want of due vigilance and
discrimination in the choice of assignees, or the
injudicious conduct of their advisers, has in too
many instances rendered this clause less operative
than it would otherwise have been—it is due to
the wisdom and justice of Parliament to pro-
nounce this a most equitable and considerate pro-
tectio❑ for the unfortunate, arid it is highly de-
sirable that they should have the full benefit of it.
In the administration of this clause the late Ser-
jeant Palmer decided that a small annuity granted
to a poor widow (I think 601.) should not be
alienated, as he considered it a hardship to de-
prive her of so small a pittance.
The Legislature has been equally vigilant in
protecting all the legal rights and just claims of
creditors, nearly to the full extent of hurna❑ fore-
sight. A creditor may apply to the Court within
a twelvemonth to avoid the discharge of the
debtor, if it has been improperly obtained, either
in a fraudulent manner, 01 on proof of conceal-
ment of the debtor's' estate or effects, or for
want of a due specification of propetty in the sche-
dule ; iu either of which cases the Court may de-
clare the discharge void, and the creditor may
pmbeed against the debtor as if such eischarge
had not been obtained ; or, upon application to
the Court, the prisoner, may be remanded to cus-
tody by warrant under the hand and seal of the
Commissioner, whereupon the estate and effects
of the prisoner shall be re-assigned to him, except
as to the dividends already applied in payment of
his debts, whici► may be retained by his several
creditors, excepting only tl►e creditor who shall
apply to avoid the discharge, and who is to repay
the dividends received before the order of remand
shall issue.

Temple.

[To be continued.]

W. M-N.

LAW INTELLIGENCE.

VICE-CHANCELLOR'S COURT, 19.

OPERA-HOUSE.-FERFORMERS' SALAAM.

WATERS V. TAYLOR.

Mr. HEALD stated, that the present cause arose
out of exceptions taken to the Report of the Mas-
ter on a Decree of the Court, dated 12(11 Decem-
ber, 1813. By that Decree the Master was di-
rected to inquire whether any debts had been
contracted in conducting the affairs of the Opera-
house since 1802, and whether• there were any
outstanding debts which affected the plaintiff as
the executor of Mr• Could. The exceptions were

five in number and • he should stale them in the
order of the Report. The first was to the amount
of Mr. Didelot's claims. The Master in his Re-
port had found, that Charles Lewis Didelot was
engaged by Mr. Tayor to be sole Master of the
Ballet at the Opera-house, from 1811 to 1811,
at an annual salary of 11501. payable in three in-
stalments; and that from Mr. Taylor's having
omitted to pay all these instalments, a balance of
10211. 13s. 4d. was due to Mr. Didelor by the
plaintiff. The exception to this part of the Re-
port rested on the following grounds :—Mr.
Didelot, when he found that Mr. Taylor was
prevented from paying him by a Decree of the
Court, entered into a new agreement_ with Mr.
Waters. It was evident that he could not enter
into any new engagement without cancelling, in
the eye of law, every claim on Mr. Taylor, who
no longer retained any contrail' over his person.
The SOLICITGR-GCNBRAL —When the decree
of the Court was made, Mr. Waters gave Mr.
Didelot 550/. as the proportion of his salary. for
that part of the season which remained when the
decree was made, not as a .yearly salary in terms

of a netv engagement.
Air. HEALD read the affidavit of Mr. Didelot,
which statcd, that with the knowledge and con-
currence of Mr. Taylor, he had entered into a
new engagement with the plain;ilf, Waters. He
contended that it was of no conseTtence in what
month the decree xvas made, or ‘vhen the season
commenced, as (Le engagement of .M r. Dideiot
was for the year. W‘ts ht to tr,ke 5501. from

Mr. IVeert, and at td•d same tt►:ie be entitled to
1150/. from Mr. Taylor
. . .

VICE-CIIANCELLOR.—The affidavit of Mr.
Dide:ot does not state, whether, in making a new
agreement with Mr. Waters, he released Mr.
Taylor from the former contract.
The SOLICITOR•GENERAL said, that the first
instalment was payable iu April, and the second
in January ; the third, however, could not be
paid by Mr. Taylor on account of the decree of
Court. The 5501. were therefore given for the
remainder of the season, and Mr. Didelot aban-
doned the claim on Mr. Taylor for the whole
year's salary. The Master says, "As Mr. Di,
(feint has agreed to perform during the remainder
of the season for 5501., 1 give Mr. Taylor the
benefit of this contract, and relieve the joint stock
from the payment of that pat t of the year's sala-
ry." It was but fair that, as Mr. Waters had the
sole benefit of Mr. Didelot's services during that
period, he alone should pay for them.

VICE-CHANCELLOR--\II. Solicitor-General,
there is more doubt on this point than you seem
aivire of. if the annual salary of Mr. Didelot
vas 11501., then, in addition to the 5501. paid
by Mr. Waters, he was entitled to the other 6001.
But he says a new agreement. was made with
Mr. IVaters, and I an not informed I,rhat that
agreement was. It Mr. Taylor was released from
his cow ract, bow could he afterwards be bound
by it ?
e SOLICITOR-GENERAL thought, -with great
defereme to the Court, that Air. Heald was
bound to show that Mr. Waters had relieved
Mrjaylor from his agreement.

The VICE-CHANCELLOR conceived that the
whole question was, whether Mr. Dick.lot, by his
new engagement, released Mr. Taylor front his
contract ; or whet her that engagement only gave
Mr. Taylor the benefit of the sums paid by Mr.
Waters, without dissolving the contract. That
the Master did not think the contract dissolved
Ltd, the subsequent aweement was evident from his
ieport ; but he bad founded his opinion on an
affidavit which did not warrant that opinion; for
he (the Master) clearly thought that tie agree-
ment between Mr. Didelot and Mr. Waters was
with the concurrence of' Mr. Taylor; that the
5001. given by Mr. waters were to be considered
a part of the 11501. ; and that Mr. Taylor w-as
bound to make up the deficiency. lie wished to
hear the other exceptions.

Mr. !lEALD stated, that the other tour excep-
tions were taken to the amount of debts reported
by the Master to be due to four other pertortuers,
and were precisely similar in principle to the one
which had been discussed.

FloNotlß then decreed, that it be referred
to the Master, whether the new engagements en-
tered into by t hese performers released Mr. Taylor
from the original contracts with them ; with h-
berty to the Master to state any cit•cutnstances be
way think proper. This he conceived to be the
only course be could take, unless he should direct
each of the parties to enter an action at law.—
( The Times)

COURT OF' KING'S BENCH. JAN. 19.
FALSE IMPRISONMENT.

THE MARQUIS D'AOUSI v. ELMORE.
Mr. GURNEY stated, that tilk was an action in
which the plaintiff, a Nobleman of high rank and
large property in -France, soeght to recover a
compensation from the delendaut, a horse-dealer,
for a malicious arrest and false imprisonment,
The plaintiff, it would appear, being anxious to
have some English hunters to take over to France
with biaa, %%eta, on the 24;1a of September, 1817,
to the defendant's stables to look at some : as he
could Tot speak English, he took with hint a Gen-
tleman named Bradley. 'They were shewn seve-
ral horses by the defendant's brother, Julio El-
more, and amongst others two (a bay and a
brown) which the Marquis liked. Elmore asked
250 guineas for the two ; after some discussion,
the Marquis agreed to give 220 guineas, if, on
seeing the horses leap in the field, he should ap-
prove their action. The horses were accordingly
taken to a field in the neighbourhood, Joltn El-
more riding on one, and a boy on the other. Here
John Elmore, after a variety of attempts to leap
the horse which he rode, eltiniately declined
doing so, but told the Marquis he might if lie
pleased, alleging,. is an excuse for his not doing
so, that his nerves were not equal to it. The
Marquis, though not pleased, mounted the
brown horse, and was trotting round the
field, when, on looking round, he perceived that
John Elmore had left them, and was riding
home. The Marquis felt offended at this; he dis-
mounted from the brown horse, delivered him
over to Elrnore's boy, and ste the same time sent
a message to Elmore, to sarbe would not have dm
bay horse at any price ; but lie was ready still to
take the brown horse at the price ofj2o guineas,
if be saw him leap. Two or three days afterwards
the Marquis, to his utter astonishment, was ar-
rested at his hotel, and taken to a lock-op house,
for a debt of 220 guineas, at the suit of• Elmore,
on pretence of his having purchased these two
horses. He continued in confinement :about five
hours, when he was liberated on putting in bail.
The defendant, however, afterwards dropped the
action, and suffered
.judgment of non pros to be
entered. For the imprisonment which the Mar-
quis had thus suffered, the plaintiff brought the
toesent action.--Mr. GURNEY Celled WitoeSSCS to
substantiate his case.
Mr. SCARLETT, 011 the part of the defendant,.
called several witnesses to prove that the plaintiff
purchased the horses, and agreed with Mr.Ehnore
for their standing at livery with him, till be
should be ready to take them over to France;
that he and Mr. Bradley, his fi iend, then quitted
the stable and went away ; and whilst they we're
absent, Mr. Leigh, of Bexley, who had previously
seen the brown horse, came amin to the stable,
and wished to purchase him ; but Mr. John El-
more informed him he could not have him, as he
was sold to the Marquis. SOon after the Marquis
and Mr. Bradley loomed, and desired to have the
horses sent to it field, that they might see them
go:
,and after having done so, they sent a message •
tO Mr. Elmore to say that the Mauluis would not
have them at ail. That Mr. E. on this applied to
tfie Marquis several times, but being able to get
nO satisfactory answer, be then commenced an
I:ction against him ; he was proceeding in it, but
t the Marquis of Blandlotd having in the interim

oft, rcci guinea; for tiie brown i+ni.gc, and
a 1 100 ( Air.
hot se-t ett er, or the ),4y, -
wore considered it would be an indulgence to '
Marquis if he took the price offered, and tlf°Pri
ac
the tion against him, which he accordin&Y
Mr. Scarlet' called several witnesses to pr°"lje
case. The Jury, however, found a verdict ford'
plaintiff —Daiwtges 1001.
Mr. Gousgy btlid, he was authorized by I,
g
Marquis to state, that the damages wank' "
°,
given to a public charity in this country-4111
iris. Post.)

DIXON V. MEDGI?.S:

n(ler.')

SLANDER.—This was an action of
The declaration alleged that the defendant '0-
called the plaintiff" thief, a scamp, a screo
w and a dealer in screws"— han inuendo t
Igbi
latter ‘vords, that the defendant meant tO
plaintiff dealt in unsound horses. ttlt
Mr. SCARLETT and Mr. TINDAL condocteu
Ft
plaintiff's case, and Mr. GURNEY and Mr. P'
JONES the defendant's.
The case *As this —Both parties are dealers 0
horses, the plaintiff being the Keeper of ihe I f
pository in Barbican. At a sale by aucti°,i''
horses conducted by the plaintiff, the dereo",,°-t
attended, and bid for a lot at the price of 41.
the horse was knocked down to another bidtleh;
which provoking the anger of the defendant,.
llcti
used the words laid in the declaration, for wi
the present action was brought by the plaintafthe
Mr. GURNEY suggested in defetfee, that
1" to
avoids being uttered in anger could not be 9",,,
have that malignant. and deliberate character
cessary to support an action for (datuageS..
reff
w '
The ease,ent to the Jury under the lieonbs
Judge's direction, and a verdict was found for
plaintiff—Damages, Chronicle )

SURREY SESSIONS, florsentonger-lane,J

George illlen, was put to the Wit. upon
dictments tinder the Embezzlement Act,'
red by. his late employer, Mr. Turner, blaciiio,g,
manufacturer, in the London-rood, Sr. George 5
fields, for not accounting fort two
settle of 21. 5'
and 41. 15s. received by him as travr (for Ml.'
Turner.)
and swede',
Mr. ADOLPHUS opened the case,
that Mr. Turner, who had in the first it.sl3"c
proceeded against the prisoner for the defiejet"l't
tit'°•tai,
had been so considerable a sufferer, that d►e
his duty to proceed criminally upon the ire
.":,.
which formed the subject of the present pr()se`',i'e,
tion, bait which di►d not form any part of the
ficiency acknowledged by the prisoner.
~t of
Before the calling of any witnesses io stlPPo;ifi.
the charge, the Chairman, it r. '1.1,...
mated, as the.opinion of the 8,7,*, :hat fte• 11i
dicttnent could not be sustaicz;c;, ..r. I,‘,l':;:t'lte‘r
a matter of account between.tho iiarties.
Tl•e- .*
. I►rigoner was therefore initnediate:
~, ale'
quitted. , tteo
111 r. ALLEY, as Counsel for the prisoner, 1. f
moved the Court for a c;ipy of the indictment,"
with the view of founding proceedings for a tt►a,
felt I,
licious prosecution, alleging that. the defentie
was the victim of a contest between tWo plaV 4,
I•
Old,6)If:I:ib risi a i b!
Bailey.il ca: tki ionogel' ecrass'e and
aCCrintteCal:ki;:, S:1:11111/416
notA Itro. Ag
tro.aonl.tP Nv
thes
ncloortlitztiebde,cat that the ;
if the
Ct
hoeuill.triosolel';.
thought fit, he might apply for a ~co►py of tt:e WI
dietment through the Attorney•Geueral, opal
(f 5,,,,
if7silteeiirirdse_:,ipsr.l_til reyt:r!iet((,Tri\agitilatta((i)t
it:
1,1,1)
ete
Aacsthtyaoeurtgne(elyoa..rigGea.ei
ntlislit.ra.lllA.i_u(ti,‘,llvio)aisti
itiosfialtie;,
proceeding, when he was in►errupted by
The CHAIRMAN, who said that the Bench. Werf
satisfied that the application must be refused, (II;
Court seeing no reason to grant it, and not fedi"
itself called upon to give any opinion. The 1".°:
e ,riag
11
Lancers,
va 1
yew
t...._iee er:l Times.
: morning
a 1
preparatoryi
d ) s e
per mode was that pointed out by Mr. AtIoll'":,
at seven o'clock, esc-Mqed b,Y., itS
ifbirtoo:iiiklyi
ofNlv 20 convicts were were retnniell,
ntd7sont hteoi r thiel being it'rs::"."los;
ported to New South Wales. They -are Chic.
under sentence of seven years' transpot•ta►io+

BS RTH .
Ou the Mb instant, at Edmonton, Mrs. Bowden, °t. I
aughter.

On Saturday, the 16th instDl.,E Mrs. Batten, wife of the%jott
S. E. Batten, one of the Masters of Harrow, after O
of a son. ,Dr.
At 'Weymouth, Dorset, Mrs. Butcher, relict Tv,. of
William Botcher, of Wileot, Wilts, and only daog`%-oref
-William Vale, Esq., of Portman-street, Porttuawsq
surviving her husband only 11 months.
On Monday, the Dith inst., at her house in 1.,,,,,„fie,
street,-aged 83, Mrs. Wright, widow of the late ,•"'"
Wright, Esq., of the. Admiralty.

PROVINCIAT, BIRTH, M.IRRIAGES, AND D
BIRTH. , t
At Pinkie House, near Edinburgh. on the 12th .05'.
.ady of Sir John Hope, of Craighall, Bart. of a son'

AL% URI E. liitl#
On the 12th inst. in St. Paul's Chapel, Edinburg'',
tenant-Colonel George M‘Konochie, in the. service (.;:e
j'ish,
Honourable East India Company, on the ilontbay estaj late
inent, to Miss Isabella Alison, youngest daughter a the
James Esq. of the Koval Nai:v. T • ute'
On tbe itch inst. at St. ACine's Church, "--'l,eent
nant Guy Caricton M'Carty Colclongh, of the 62d
tY
second son Of Henry Colelough, Es q. of Monnt-Sien, ci°a,Tie
of Carlow, to Margaret, eldest daughter of the late
Cooke, .E,(l. of Kilhenny.

At Calcutta, Eao Tinlies, on the 19th Silly last, Sara,,l',;bill'
of Dr. James Robinson, son of the late Rev. Thomas
son, of Leicester. , tbe
On the t tth inst. William Forster, of Ballynore,
county of Ntonagliatr, Ireland, Esq. • and, on the prece(seeli
day, his only sister, Mrs. Michell, relict of Blaney I"
At' her hone,- Castle street, Edinburzh,
tette! Esq.
the Honourable Miss Henrietta Napier, 'daughter of the
Lotd Napier. Ott
At her father's house, Ahercrorrili • place, I,:dinbargb,
the lot inst. Anne Mat iii hair, dar)i-Aiter, of Colonel Mali,
Deputy Governor of Fort George.
On the tst inst. at Kilblaan, in the parish of Soul Peal".
Is'
Ar,vitsii:r • C • once Watson, at the advanced ag.c of I°' lira,
She was on 1),• once married, and was the mother of 13 chit"'
on the Mil illl3stt;

LONDON: Printed t)' 3. B. CARSTAIRS, of No. 2P, (if.:
Ormond-street, Qoeen-s.itiare; .and pn Wished bysci
SCRIPPS, of No. 7, South INl(dton-street, tTi" ,
Oilier, No. Ito, Strand ; .stitere,.Adrettlsements,
Leltsrs, &e. OV't
(post-paid) utuA aldress.ed.

PHs
y‘mi
Golf
04,1-
$64
V, 4
ie
103
4.1 e.

~lci)t)ti
A
4,144.
41,, 'lk ,;iIG
ki•
tgrit
t::14
v 11
I)
It '4ll
1(11."
t 4„, )e ,
ks4l:4
cl 4