The Sun.
London, England, 1845-07-10 00:00:00

Etirtt Wilbttion

NE WMARK ET RACES.

THIS DAY-BY EXPRESS.)

Handicap. New T.Y.C.

Skeleton, 7st

walked over•

Sweepstakes. New T.Y.C.

Tunick
Colt by Glaucus

Stamp
Tom Sare
Won by a length,
Chesterfield Staaes.

Free Lance
f by Cesar
Guzman

Mecca colt
Nell Cook

Won easy by two lengths.-6 to 4on the winner.

CORN AVERAGES.
GENERAL AVERAGE PRICES OF BRITISH CORN
'or the Week ended July 5, 1845, made up from the Returns of
Inspectors in the different Cities and Towns in England and Wide"
per Imperial Quarter.

- -
WHEAT. 1
9BARLET.I OATS. 1 RTE. 1 BEANS. 1 TEAT
PRICE •• 47s Ild 29s 10d 22s 8d 3 s 0,1 38s 10d
Gd 398
I 64
DUTY. •• 20s 0,1 sOd 6s fd lOs Gd 4s 5i

MARKET NE vv THIS DAY.)
HAY TYS.AZIKEIra.
SMITHFIELD.—Coarse Meadow Hay, 31 15s to 4/15s ; us,rut
do., 4/ 16s to 5/ 8s; fine Upland do., 5/ lOs to 5/ 15.1
Clover Hay, 41 lOs to 6l; Oat Straw, I/ 188 to 2/ ; Whie'Bl
Straw, 2/ to 2/ 2s per load. A moderate supply, au°
steady trade.
Custr.EßLAND.—Coarse Meadow Hay, 3/ 18s to 4/18s ;C
ditto, 5/ to 5/ 88; fine Upland ditto, 5/10s to 5/ 16s ; c„,.lta
Hay, 4/ 108 to 6l; Oat Straw, 1/ 18s to 2l; uu7„
Straw, 2/ to 2! 2s per load. Supply rather limited, II"
trade firm.
WIIITECHAFEL.—Coarse Meadow Hay, 3l 15s to 41154;
useful ditto, 4/ 16s to 5! 8s ; fine Upland ditto, 51 I°9oj;
5/ 14s ; Clover Ih 'y, 4/ lOs to 616 s • Oat Straw, 11 18s b
it
Wheat Straw, 2/ to 2/ 2s per load. Both Hay and St°
met a slow iuiry, at late rates. d•
New Meadow Hay sold at from 31 lOs to 4/ lOs per I°l3
COAL MARKET. Wet
Prices per ton at the close of the market :—Buddle's
Hartley, 14s 9d; Chester Main, 14s; Hasting's Hart
14s 9d ; Nelson's West Hartley, 15s ; New Tanfield, 6ny
Original Tantleld, 13s 6d; Ord's Redheugh, 13s; B„aiv,e4(l;
worth West Hartley, 14s 9d ; Taylor's West Hartley, I",ta,
Tanfield Moor, 15s 9d; West Wylam, 14s 9d; Wr,-50
14s 3d ; Wall's-end, Riddell's, 14s 9d ; Wharncliffe,
Eden Main, 15s 3d ; Lambton, 16s 9d ; Pemberton, 15s;
sell's Hetton, 16s; Adelaide, 16s 6d; Stanley, 14s; Sidgmeips
Hartley, 15s 6d; West Hartley Netherton,
arrived, 7.
V.)
HOUSE OF LORDS.—(THIS
The House sat to-day to hear appeals. The Peers I:orel/0' j
were—Lord Brougham, Lord Cottenham, Lord Campbell'
the Bishop of Ely.
GRANT V. FINDLEY. •
dtbeit
The further arguments in this part-heatd case occupied
Lordships the whole morning.

CHANCERY.—(THIS DAY.)
The Lord Chancellor sat in Lincoln's Inn-hall to.day.
BARKS V. JACKSON—JUDGMENT.
The LORD CHANCELLOR gave judgment to-day in thiel;
which was heard some time since upon appeal from the the
cision of the Vice-Chancellor Knight Bruce, directing..."
trial of an issue. The facts may he thus shortly stateo:o
Harriett M. Smith died unmarried and intestate, and e
•strs'
was instituted in the Prerogative Court far the adinini two
tion of her estate by the defendant Jackson, claiming
ar3l:oso
second husband of the sister of the intestate. Mrs. B,red
claimed as niece and next of kin. The Court del° doi.
favour of Jackson, the sentence of the Court being that ;01
nistiation should be granted to him as next of kin. A it
afterwards instituted in the Court of Chancery by Mrs. of ihs
c!aiming, as niece and next of kin, the residuary estate o
the
intestate. The defendant, in his answer, insisted nr,,oes.
sentence of the Ecclesiastical Court, stating that the !feel mticsi
tion now in issue was the sole question in the Ecclesisev
Court and t hat that question had been decided in his footle' to
question, then, was, whether, under these circnmstances'i.tie.
point having been decided between the same PI
:i
in the administration suit,l it was conclusive bOl
favour of Mr. Jackson. The Vice-Chancellor sot
ordered an issue to be tried, and from that decision the ire the
the
appeal was brought. It was stated in the arguments tilj la
point had been decided in the House of Lords in 17',0'1114
Boucher v. Taylor, and if such was the fact, that decision "-
be binding upon the Court. f the
His LORDSHIP, after going at some length into the facths.et
cae of Boucher v. Taylor, stated his opinion to be, t"-, the
question had been decided in the Houso of Lords, thaivee
Judgment of the Ecclesiastical Court was conclusive• the
the whole, therefore, his Lordship was of opinion tb:_ed.
appeal ought to be allowed, and the judgment below reve
The Court then proceeded to hear petitions and aPPes

65
65
.6_ 3/4

27 43
6 7z;

15%
304
38 ,A 4
33

2%
8,/s
8%

11%
205
113
3

24
46%
2441 A

281,4
3%

531,
38 1,,..i

VS;
31/
25;4
21%

1%
6•!
Zip
3%

4

ROLLS' COUR P.—(THIS D.A.Y./
LORD NELSON Z. LORD ERIDPORT. the
The further arguments in this case occupied the I)°‘
whole morning. - •

VICE-CHANCERY.—(THIS D Al(1.01r;
Nothing particular occurred in any of the Vice Chance
Courts.

QUEEN'S BENCH.—(THIS DAY a•
(Nisi Prius Sittings at Guildhall, before Lord Dattstao 1/11
Special Jury.)
THE QUEEN V. FORBES THE YOUNGER. oer
This was an indictment preferred by Messrs. Little, or
chants in the City, against the defendant, an exteusife.deri
broker, also of the City, for an alleged libel upon the char:o',
and solvency of the prosecutors, contained in certain cotelo:0
tions and correspondence with a mercantile house abroad,:ich
which the defendant was charged asbeing the author, ono
denied. The whole matter formed the subject of inquiries ip
investigation at the Mansion. house before the Lord bellied ti
January last, the particulars of which were fully put'otit 't§
the time. There was also a second indictment, arien'efebso'
the same transaction. The Court was crowded with toe'
and others connected with the shipping interest. r. 'li O'
Mr. John Jervis, Mr. W. H. Watson, and Mr. 1010
appeared on the part of the prosecution; and Sir Thorne'
and Mr. James for the defendant. hef,
og
On the jury being called, and taking their places in t toci
an intimation was given to the Learned Judge, before tete
his seat on the bench, that the parties were anxious to totlea
with a view to enter into an arrangement by which tilt, cl
of the defendant being the author of the libel coloP114,:jl
could be more satisfactorily ascertained than by on ar:g
the jury ; and Sir Thomas Wilde and Mr. Jervis, after
had patiently waited nearly two hours, entered the CO' "
his Lordship having taken his seat, A 04 be
Sir THOMAS WILDE said, on the part of the defen•Atorititf
was happy to state that the parties had succeeded in eneilet:
into such an arrangement, by the execution of certain bgtetOri
carry out that arrangement, by which a full and set?the tie°
inquiry might be made into the truth and accuracy 01 t ece,.°;
fendant being guilty of what he characterised as a 111°.!
dalous and wicked libel against the character and ere,11,., tto
prosecutors, as also a facility afforded by which to trace tP
authors of the libel in question. a 1,45
,se 4,
Mr. JERVIS, on the part of the prosecution, exPr-gooto,-of
self satisfied with the arrangement that had been entered eve
that the prosecutors were most anxious to facilitate no,
way possible, any proposition to enable the defendant to
he was not guilty of the charge made against him. areetigr;
Lord DENMAN congratulated the parties upon the. 01
.1
ment that had bt en entered into, which was cerunn.(oo3s
satisfactory than an inquiry in Court. His Lordship hair
the jury for their attendance and patience, and ill"
them, this being the end of the sitting.
4f.)

SHERIFFS' COURT.-(THIS 110''
(Before Mr. Under-Sheriff Buuctint..)
RUTTER V. PATFIELD. _,;etort,,tl
The plaintiff in this action is a stage-coach pror"reetu-
the Bolt-in-Tun, Fleet-street, and the defendant is s tbe
vic!ualkr. at Hounslow. The claim was 41. Ile' 6.' d'
o.'ea
amount of a cheque cashed on his account, but dishonuf "Isi
The facts of the ease were these—that on the 3(1 pee;
last a prison named Arnold, a butcher in Hounslowt fr-ociaol
a cheque from a person named Binns. He took it to rie'etbetle
and a-ked him to send it up by the coachman to get it Ovoid;
the butker's, and bring down the money in the e vei It
Plaintiff, on the return of the coach, handed the 017,,,00
the defendant, and said it was all right, and de si
seversi tbe
sff
paid him Is. 6d. for the trouble. It was
afterwards before anything more was heard, yep dihes
claque, and then it was stated that the cheque haur,f,
honoured, and the mono y detnan..ed back of defers Itea
raid he would speak to Arnold upon it, and see ore eeimp▪ l.'
the money from him, and he would hand it '„n oaet;
howev.e, declined on the ground that the loss had beef
sinned through the lion-presentment in due time. The, erj, • 104
as to the time of presenting it was very obscure. A e'e lc lei
• • mer a bet
Williams, Deacon, and Co , deposed that Binns or 4„ „h
an account there. but it was closed on the 14th of '„rirl Ow;
opened again On the 34 of May, and the whole atooulritb•,
drat., n the .5..1114. he believed at the request of thethrotit
be had alas •r bt en irregular. The cheque "mei..
ott theit
anoti balling-hou,e, but it was o
not po.sible to 0 g.-
day, a• it was returned. On the 13th informatin v
that the cheque had been dishonoured.