The Sun.
London, England, 1844-03-22 00:00:00

PARLIAMEIN TAR 1- DIV ISIOIs

(Prom the Votes and Proceedings If the House of Commons.)
WEDNESDAY, MARCH 20.
COUNTY CORONERS BILL.
(IN THE COMMITTEE.)
Sixth Clause (Coroner to be chosen by a majority of per-
sons duly qualified to vote at the Election of Knights of the
Shire for the County, &c.) :—Amendment proposed, to leave
out " Knights of the Shire," in order to insert " Coroners
instead thereof:—Question put, " That ' Knights of the
Shire' stand part of the Clause :"—The Committee divided

MINORITY-AYES, 45.
Arkwright, George—Leominster Lascelles, Hon. W.--Wakefield
Bailey, J.—Herefordshire Lawson, A.—Knaresborough
Baskerville, T. B.—Herefordshire Lincoln. Earl of—Northampten
Beckett, W.—Leeds: shire, South
Bradshaw James—Canterbury Lygon, Major-Gen. Hon. H.
Buck, L. W.—North Devonshire Worcestershire West.
Chute, W. L. W.—West Norfolk March, Earl of—West Sussex
Cripps, William—Cirencester Marsham, Lord—West Kent
Darner, Hon G.—Portarlington Miles, Philip W. Skynner—Brkitc
Darby, George—East Sussex Miles .William—Somersetshire
Dickinson, F. H.—Somerset W. Nicholl, Right Hon. Sir John
Divett, Edward—Exeter Ossulston, Lord—Northumbct
Farnham, F.B.—N. Leicestershir Patten, Wilson—Lancashire
Flower, Sir J.—Thetford Peel, Col. Jonathan—Huntmgcloc
Fuller, A. E.—East Sussex Rendlesham, Lord —East Su& lk
Gasket!, James Manes— Wenloek" Russell, C.—lteading
Gladstone, Captain—lpswich Shirley. E.—Monaghan
Gore, W. R. 0 Sligo Co. Smith T. B. C.— Ripon
Graham, Right Hon. Sir J. R. G. Spry, Sir S .T.—Bodmin
—Dorchester Sutton, C. M.—Cambridge

Hardinge, Right Hon. air H•— Walsh, Sir John B...—Raihicashite
Launceston Wilbraham, Hon. R. 8.-1 atica

Hinde, J. Hodgson—Newcastle. shire
upon-Tyne Wyndham, Colonel...W. Fussex
Irving, John—Antrim Co. TELLERS.
Jermyn, Earl—Bury, Suffolk Pakington, J. S.—Droitwlch
Knatchbull, Sir E.—East Kent Knight, H. (I.—Nottinghamshir4

MAJORITY—NOES, 70.
Aglionby, H. A.—Cockermouth Hanmer, Sir J.—Hull
Aldatn, William—Le.ds Hawes, B.—Lambeth
Arundel and Surrey, Earl of— Hay, Sir A. L.—Elgin, &c
Arundel Henley, J. W.—Oxfords! ire
Bannerman, A.—Aberdeen Hindley, Charles—aahton
Barclay, D.—Sunderland Hodgson,lßd.—Berwick-on Tweed
Berkeley, Hon. M. F.—Gloucester Howard, C. W. G.—Cuml.erlaud
Berkeley, Hon. H. F.—Bristol Hutt, W.—Gateshead
Bernal, R. jun.—Wycombe James. William—Cumber.and
Bowes, J.—South Durham Johnstone, A.—Renfrew, &o.
Broadley, Henry—East Yorkshire Kemble, H.—East Surrey
Brotherton, J.—Salford Manners, Lord J.—Newark
Bruges, W. H. L —D.:vizes Marjoribanks, S. —Hy the
Puller, Charles—Liskeard Martin, John—Tewkesbui yr
Buller, Edward—Stafford Morgan, O.—Monmouthshire
Butler, Hon. P.—Kilkenny Co. Morris, D.—Carmarthen
Bvng, Right Hon. G. S.—Chatham Morrison, James—lnverness
Cavendish, Hon. G. H.—N. Derby Napier, Sir Charles—Maryleben:
Colborne, Hon. W.—Richmond Faget, Lord A.—Lichfield
Collett, John—Athlone Philip., G. R.—Poo:e
Crawford. S.—Rochdale Plumridge, Captain—Pei.lyn or
Davies, D. A.— Carmarthen shire Falmouth
Dawson, Hon T. V.—Louth Co. Ricardo, L.—Stoke-upor -Trent
D'Eyncourt. Right Hon. C. T.— Rushbrooke Colonel—Suflollr
Lambeth Smith, R. V. —Northampton
Douglas, Sir C. E.—Warwick Smythe, Hon. G.—Cantu:bury
Duncan, Viscount—Bath Strickland, Sir o.—Preston
Duncornbe. T. S..—Finsbury Trelawny, J. S.—Tavist‘ck
Dusdas, Admiral—Greenwich 1 roubridge, Sir E. T.—S•sodvrch
Egerton, W. Tatton—Cheshire Wall, C. Baring—Guildford
Escott, 8.--Winchester Wallace, Robert—GreenocK
Ewart, William—Dumfries Want, H. G.—Sheffield
Nelden, John—Oldham Wawn, J. T.—South Shields
Fox, Colonel—Tower Hamlets Wilshere, William—Yanncutt
French, F.—Rosscommon Wood, Colonel T.—Middlesex
Gill, T.—Plymouth TELLERS.
Guest, J. J.—Mertkyr Tydvil Scott, Robert—Walsall
Hall, Sir Benjamin—Mar y lebone Warburton, H —Kendal

mcnse number of persons who had followed their
pastors into the Free Church. But he would tell them
that these churches were built with every regard to
economy—Scotch economy.—(llear.) These, or nearly
all these churches had been raised out of the deep po-
verty of the people; yet so thoroughly were they embued
with the necessity for such edifices, that upwards of
206,0001. were subscribed by the poor and despised.
Two hundred and eighty-seven new chulches were yet
needed. Their people were well nigh exhausted, and it
was for this the ministry appealed. The Rev. Gentle-
man concluded by stating, that the weekly income for
the support of the Free Church ministers was now
2,3541., and that not a farthing of the money subscribed
for church-building purposes, went to the maintenance
of the clergy.
The Rev. Mr. M`KELLAR and other ministers 'after-
wards spoke at some length, and the meeting separated
at ten o'clock.