The Sun.
London, England, 1819-02-04 00:00:00

FOR THE SUN.

Mn.EDITOR?-1 beg leave to insert in your
respectable Paper (because I find you are a friend
to truth and an enemy to superstition) my dislike
of Mr. IlsmtisT's motion for alleviating the pit.
nishment of criminals and evil-disposed persons,
ordered 'for transportation. Now, Sir, if the
crimes of the culprits diminished in number, I
should be for Mr. KENNET'S motion in behalf of
Dr. HALLORAN. lint as people can hardly sleep
in their beds, or walk the streets by night, without
fear and danger, the punishment of et itninds ma.
'Mesa), ought rather to be increased than raja-.
glued ; let good conduct be rewarded, but let
wickedness be punished accordingly. Parlours
and furnished rooms are not suitable for'pick,
pockets and robbers : ton much lenity hat-ii al
ready. been shewn to. this class of people. Willi
respect to the Minister for the Home Department,
to whom this country is under the greatest obligir-.
lions, I trust thai he will not he moved and dktot bed
by such ignorant and unconstitutional. objections ;
no .L‘linister ever acted with more justice and hu-
manity in his Lordship's official capacity. (He
that spareth the rod spoileth the child.) It the bad
are not to be punished, how can the good live ?
None but the ignorant and prejudiced would find
any thing to say against his Lordship, who Lath
always been beloved and esteemed by the wise
and good.

Liverpool, Jan. 23.

Your obedient Servant,

FOR ME SUN.

COLQ-T r .

ABUSES UNDER THE INSOLVENT ACT.

Mr. BoiToti,--114ving noticed in your Journal
an intention of bringing this subject bt:fore Par-
liament by one of the City Members, I submit.
the propriety of a stri;:t Investigation into the
conduct of Ar.,ents of the Court, whose malrersa-
lions and misconduct have heretofore been the

;!ietne of onitnadversica in your columns. I atilt
the more eocouraged to offer this suggestion, is
consequence of the observrtitons app uing iti
your Paper of Saturday lass, containing a cfupli-
went to one of the City Members, and to which
an► disposed to sub,;crihe.

1 hare no do,:ht that the diligence of the Se-
nator alluded to, will not be wanting to probe the
evils to the bottom, and it is confidently hopea
that he will possess himself of every possible in-
formation, material to the pnrposes 01 due admi-
nistration, under a Law which SO materially affects
the Comonercia/ interest, and which has been so
shamefully abused,

If this letter should reach that Gentleman's
eye, I shall intich rejoice if it should atford art
additional invitation to his good intentions in ad.
rocating the rights of Creditors and the proteetiort
of Property.
It has been admitted that the Abuses under the
Act have given great grounds of complaint, and
it will be found that numerous evils have resulted
from illegitimate and corrupt Agency, by persons
assuming the conduct of legal proceedings, with-
out the requisite qualifications or ability, and in
many cases destitute of integrity, and not suffi-
ciently restrained by legal respoi.sibilify, I doubt
not bur on inquiry sufficient evidence will be ad-
duced to prove what I have ventined to assert
and I also feel convinced that the Member alluded
to will be encouraged by other able Coadju,ors in
the cause of Justice and Restitutiwi,

Amongst the Members of the Legal Profession,
'tot, thy vtriol's Officers in his Majesty'. Courts of
Itecord, nbonclont evidence might be adduced to

illustrate the necessity of Regulations or Enact-
ments for the prevention of collusive practices and
'heir baneful restolts.

1 would, therefore, advice a Committee to be
formed, with a meet these desir,lble cods,
and, upon the result ot such Enquiry, the Public
may coutidently look forward to the provisions
ot Parliament more effectumlly to r.:lieve and pro-
Let those who tnrve bithetto had so much came
of compialut.
AN INHABITANT of Farrhiplota

EAST INDIA HOUSE.

THANKS TO THE MARQUIS OF HASTINGS, &e.

Yesterday a Court of Proprietors was held at
the India House, for the purpose of laying before
th. m official documents respecting the late mill-
y operations in India, and Resolutions of
Thanks adopted in consequence by the Court of
D rectors. The attendance was unusually great,
nod the proceedings of the last Court having
been read,

. hr Cu AIRMAN rose to submit a Proposition of
t. the Governor• General of India, for his
nna eeried efforts, splendid exertions, amid indefa-
tie,hie energy (hiring the late war in that coun-
try. lo sithreittieg this to the Court, he took a
vete minute view of the military campaign which
had been so honoerably and happily terminated,
and in the wariurst manner eulogized the Gover-
nor-General for the very excellent conduct lie had
shewn during the whole of it. It was utterly im-
possible 'to reaieke the oecurrences which bad
taken place, and not to perceive that the out-
rages committed by the enemy were marked by
desolation and rapine in every respect. One vil-
lage was burned with all its inhabitants, females
were polluted and then destroyed, while scenes.
of cruelty were committed, the recital 'of which
was more than enough to appal the stoutest heart.
These were only the beginning of what followed ;
arid so wretched was the condition of the inha-
bitants, that all confidence in the British Go-
vernment was abandoned, and refuge sought in
the woods and tuountuins. A dispatch from the
Governor-General, of the 28th of May, 1817,
stated the further outrages which were perpe-
trating ; and io answer, the Secret Committee
wrote to his Lordship that the plan he had adopt-
ed met with their approbation, and they would
leave it to him not only to do what he saw pro-
per for the defence of their territoriew, but also
for the punishment of the aggressors.—(Hear,
bear !)--So admirable were the arrangements of
the Cempany's' armies, that though there was
much confidence in the Treaties which had been
entered into, Sir Thomas I-Fallon was at once or-
dered to advance, and gained the victory. After
a short recapitulation of the leading events of the
war, the worthy Chairman concluded by moving,
That the Thanks of rite Court should be given
to the Most Noble the- Marquis of Hastings,
R. G. tor the eisdom, skill, and energy lie had
displayed, in planning and conducting the war
against the Pinderees, and while the Court re-
gretted the occurrence of any circumstances lead-
ing to an• extension of the 'territory, it duly ap-
preciated the ; promptitude and exertions of the
Noble Marquis, whereby he had dispelled the ga-
thering elements of a confederacy among the
Mehratta States against the British 'Empire; -
CAMPBELL MABJORIBANKS, Esq. the Deputy
Cheie man. seconded the motion.
Mr. R. Jeottsoe wished' some extracts to he
read from the voluminous papers w;bielt were ly-
. ing on the 'table. It was true the Directors had
produced these papers for the-information of the
Proprietors, but from their very voluminous na-
ture, it was utterly impossible for any individual
to have so much leisure time as to read them, and
therefore it might give the Proprietors some know-
ledee of what had been going on if the extracts
were read.
This• was agreed to, and the several extracts
were read by one of the Clet ks. The first was
en eeteriet from Captain Sydenham's dispatch re-
lative to thePindarees, in 1809,- in which he•de-
seribed the horrid character of these depredator,:
They eestvt-Ally, lie observed, made long marches,
and subsisted chiefly on plunder, while they de-
stroyed what they were not able to carry off, vio-
lating the wives and -daughters of those whose
villages they invaded, and afterwards putting
them to death. Seldom did they leave a village
witlinett burning it, and it was impossible to pre-
vent their approaches, as their .movements were
rapid and uncertain, nor were their depredations
to be measured by the quantity they carried off.
The inhabitants were thus driven to the woods,
and were under such terror as' to make their re-
turn to their habitations long 'and doubtful.—
Government were thus defrauded to the greatest
extent by this army of freebooters, who deprived'
the agriculturist and husbandman of those bless
sings whin!) Providence bestowed on them, the;
crops.being carried off. It. was impossible to es-
timate their numbers, as they generally advanced 1
in detached bodies,
,joined by all who were either
disgusted with the pursuits-of an honest life, ordis-
carded from society for their profligate and vicious
habits.--(Hear !)—The next was a dispatch .from
Captain Duizeli, in March 1816, wherein, speak-
ing of the outrages then going on, he said the
cruelties practised by these invaders were such,
that the inhabitants of a village had -chosen ra-
ther to destroy themselves., families and property,
titan submit -to those awful .privations which they
must otherwise have endured.--A number •of
other dispar.ches were read, equally confirming
the horrible excesses which had been committed.
Mr. R. JACKSON -then rose; After what had
just been read, and the awful description of cruel-
ties which had been given, be confessed .the whole
appeared so astonishing, that one was disposed
rather to•thirik they resembled a legendary tale,
than • were actually founded on facts.'

bow' vcr, soul' excesses cre proved by the most

incontrovel ale evidence, he hoped the Court

would agree with hint in the prop.riety of witlit,g

some I.k'ortil to the motion just put iron► the

Chitir. Sorry :vs he felt to he the cause of

torbinz the harmony of the Court, he felt it his
dtry nevertheless to protest against the proceed-
ings of 'he day, because formerly motions of the

Prevent nature used to originate on the outside or
the hAr, as it was generally thought the Proprietors

had sot-below common s•?o,e to enable them to vote

int the pers before th& tn. In the cases
of Lord Cornwallii and Marquis Wellesley, the

nietits of the respective Governors were gen,tally
stared, and days atterwoirds fixed for the conside-
rAtion of vote's of thanks to them. lie objected
to the latter part or the motion, which elitpressed

env rt-iri at the extension 01 the let ritories, as he

conceived the expression of that 'egret was dero-
ratitly to ihe vote of I :nks. He recollected they
h fit pr,,vosed a vote of thrtoks to Margois Welles-

ley, adding- at the same time, that in doing so,

• they did not enter upon the justice of the war...—
Feeling as he did, that such a vote was wrong, he
was fortunately successful in introdoeing the
words, " as the documents had not beets laid on
the table of the Court.'' It was absurd to think,
that with a vote of thanks to the Noble Marquis
of Hastings, the Court should and an expression
of regret at the extension of their territories.—
Their conduct reminded him of the admirable fable
of the penitential fox, who lamented the depreda-
tions he had committed, and cautioned others
against the same, hot unfortunately tor• his mora-
lity, a roost being near, he thought it not-amiss to
seize a chicken or wo (a laugh). MI the Court stip-
po,e that any person out of doors would believe
they were sincerely avetsc to an increase' of terri-
tory, ? The words he meant to insert, instead of
" dispersing the gathering elements," &c. were,
that " he had anticipated and encountered acot).
feth racy among the Mahratta states, defeated their
.trunks, and rendered their means ofaiggressiou in
future diSapnointed." He would venture to say
here was not a single Honourable Director with-
in the Bar who could lay his hand upon his heart
and say that this addition was riot necessary, es-
pecially considering what had already been said by
the Chairman • respecting the deficiency of the
words in the motion to express their just sense of
the merits of the Noble Marquis. The very idea
of " gathering elements " was absurd, as the vote
of Thanks implied that something had been done,
and a regularly formed army defeated by the wis-
dom, skill, and energy of the Noble Marquis.—
The Learned Gentleman then concluded by read-
ing the amendment.
Mr. FLETCHER, in seconding it, observed, that
he had no intention of troubling the C,.tirt, had
he not been forcibly struck with the able and hit-
morons statement oldie Learned Gentleman who
had just sat down. Whence arose that poverty
of language of which the Chairman had complain-
ed ? Had 24 Gentlemen, in the situation of Di-
!
• rectors, not been able to And adegoaie words ? If
the measures of the Noble Marquis were not ne-
cessary, then where was the propriety of thank-
ing him at all, and it they were necessary, then
why were the feelings of gratitude due to him not
to he expressed in a proper manner ? Concurring
perfectly in every word of the amendment, be
ivith the sincerest pleasure seconded it.
Mr. S. DIXON • felt it would 'be presumption in
him to (Kenny anv portion of the time of the
Court, but he hoped the amendment would 'he
agreed to by the Court of Directors. The lan-
guage of the IViirthy Mover was certainly more
expressive of those feelings of gratitude, which
were due to the Noble Marquis, than the original
motion was. He never could look but with dread
to any further extension of territory in India, as
tending more to' weaken than strengthen the
hands of the Company. He could not help think-
ing that the "gathering elements" alluded to,
arose more from natural causes than any other.
When the troops of Britain were collected toge-
ther, it was natural for the Mabratta powers to
suppose there was a cloud about to overwhel!

them, and it could not therefore be astonishing
,that these powers should form coalitions, for what
they considered- to be self-defence. In -giving this
as his opinion, he irnsted the Court would allow
him the merit 4 at least being honest and consci-
entious, for till the justice and necessity of the
war were proved, he thought the vote should be
postponed altogether.
Mr. ELPHINSTONE merely ivished to state, that
when the proposition of thanks was submitted to
the Court, it was done by the Directors, with the
view of such amendments being introduced as
miht be thought necessary anti proper ‘by the
Proprietors.
Mr. BOSANQUET contended that the amendment
was not called for, as one branch of the Mahratta
States was in arms against us at the present nio-.
Mem. The Court of Directors bad not the slightest
intention of trifling with the feelings of the Pro.'
prietors in making this motion, for he unques-
tionably felt the conduct of the Governor-Gene.-
tai deserved all that gratitude wych language
could express.
Mr Hume concurred with the Hon. Chairman
in all he had stated, but felt that. not One word
of the amendment -could be controirertol. The
Noble Marquis had received his instructions from
the Court, and he conceived it'would•he very ex-
traordinary for the Court to concur in expressing
a regret that these instructions bad been complied
w ith. The Nbble Marquis had no 'alternative
when he commenced the war, in consequence of
the measures which had been adopted by his pre-
decessor. The Court had disapproved of what
was done by Marquis Wellesley in 1803, 4, and
5, whereas the Noble Marquis had at that period
actually completed that which the Court rejoiced
as being now done. The measures of that Noble
and indefatigable• General were stopped by his
successor, Marquis Cornwallis,. to whose policy

he had no doubt the increase of the Pindarees was

owing. The prebent Governor-General had shewn

the most unwearied and liberal efforts in their

cause, and had even studied the language, that
he might thereby be the better enabled to know

more of every thing relating, to the country. Yet
though this was the case, he had formerly receiv-
ed their thanks for his military emiduct. without

any allusion to his civil policy as a statesman.—
The worthy Gentleman concluded 'by expressing

his decided opinion, that while the territories had
been increased, the authority of the Company
-had been consolidated.

Mr. BOSANQUET explained.
Mr. JACKSON also explained, that while no
doubt one pact of the ISlahratta States teas in arms
against us, that branch had been twice defeated,
and was actually now in a state of vagabondage.
Mr. GRANT dissented totally from the political
views of the Speakers on the other side. The
Court of Directors had never assented to any ex-
tension of the territories, except in the case of
Tippoo Statann, who was the decided enemy of
llritain, and of course was obliged to be put down.
Every extension whiat bad snbstquently taken
place had not been sanctioned at all by the Court.
lie certainly thought the Treaty entered into in
1802, between Marquis Wellesley and the

Pekhwa, Was 'impolitic, though he gave every

credit to that Nobie Personage for the best iuten-
tio•ts in what he did. Of the late Marquis
be was hound at all times to sneak with
respec', contidvring the integrity of his conduct.

his inflexible rectitude, profound judgment, and
consummate skill. He would not say, that it was
not necessary for the present Governor-General
not to do as he had done ; but, Nvhen Europe was
accusing the Company of unbounded ambition,
and of wishing to seize the whole territory of In-
dia, it became them to persevere in the sentiment
they had so long expressed, respecting their re-
gret that any extension should take place, espe-
ciallyconsidering that it had been declared impolitic
by the Legislature ; and surely, as a body, they

were not to be called on to entertain a different
opinion ? The debt had considerably increased,
and was much more than- when Marquis Corn-
wallis went out to India, and the expence was
even beyond the income.' They had 80,000,000
of a population to govern, while the European
forces, &c. did not exceed 40,000 ; and, on taking
a general review of the war, he must own he
could see nothing in it but the seeds of fresh
commotion ; for tliongh it was true-that the Pin-
darees were suppressed, there was no doubt they
would increase, especially as•their numbers were
composed of persons who were inured to habits
of military warfare ; and, when discharged, they
could not abandon such habits, True, the Hun-
dons were relieved, it was said, from their oppres-
sors ; but would they not become the same as be-
fore, the moment they felt they were independent ?
He felt the strongest objections to the Amend-
ment, because he thought the Court should trust
the Directors, considering the confidence they
had already placed in them, by granting them
their high situation.'

Mr. D. KINNAIRD, at considerable length, stated
the reasons why he supported the amendment,
conceiving Lord Hastings entitled to their warmest
thanks, not only for his exertions in the field, but
for the wisdom with which he had planned the
operations in the war. He bad introduced no new
policy whatever, for if he had there might be a
difference of opinion. He (Mr. K.) must own he
disliked the expression of their regret at the ex-
tension, as much as he did the language of a school-
master Who never flogged hiB scholars without
saying he was sorry for it. By expressint,r' their
regret as they proposed to do, they would in fact
encourage the charge of ambition Which Europe
was alleged to make against them. He trusted the
Noble Marquis would be able to follow as good
policy in the government of the conquered coun-
try, as the Marquis Wellesley bad done in the
same situation.

' Mr. HOWARTH could not agree with the amend-
ment of his Honourable Friend, though he cer-
tainly felt that the conduct of the Governor-Ge-
neral was beyond all praise. Pitt, Fox, Burke,'
and Dundas, all different in political views front
each other, bad agreed in pronouncing the exten-
sion of the territory to be an evil of no small
magnitude ; for be it recollected, the Company
had now a territory extending 20 degrees lon-
gitude and '2O degrees latitude. Lord Castlereagh,
when the Charter was renewed, said, that fOrtu-
nate as the Company had been, there was -a cer-
tain limit which they could not exceed without
becoming unwieldy.—Whether that was the case;
now he would not say, but he certainly did not
concur in the amendnient:-

a. few
.twhoeAltafitsnelrecroadmmreeanpltDy
i.nrf,eractosncar,rlir(.l.Jt
iloacilkovstilotehnyo,
usv•Raen,abslde.
issent-
tng voice.
,THANKS TO SIR THOS. HISLOP. '
On the question of thanks being moved to
Lieutenant-General SirThornas Bislop, a consi-
derable discussion took place; several' Proprietors
expressed their determination to oppose it,-and as
the discussion on the question was expected .to
occupy several hours, especially on •acco:tat.cPcfrottihnet
conduct of Sir Thomas Hislop relative to the
banging of a Governor, it was agreed, o
of the lateness of the hour. to postpone the de-
`late to this day at twelve o'clock.—Adjourncd at
•
"clock.

five o'c

LAW INTELLIGENCE.

cower OF KING'S BENCI-1, FEB. 3.

ACTIONS AGAINST NEWSPAPERS.
HAMILTON AGAINST LAWRENCE WILLIAM!,

GENT, &C.
Mr. ANDREWS moved for a rule to shew cause
why Mr. Lawrence Williams, of Cursitor-street,
Chancery-lane, an Attorney of this Court, should
not deliver to Mrs, Hamilton's Present Attorney,
an account of all actions brought by him in her
name, stating which of the said actions he had
comproMised ; and also why he should not de-
liver an account of all sums of money received by
him in satisfaction of those -actions, and the plain-
tiff's account.

The affidavit upv which this motion was made,
stated, that some time since the plaintiff had in-
structed/Mr. Williams, as her Attorney, to bring
actions against certain Newspapers for an alleged
Biel published against her, 'respecting child-steal-
ing—that for certain reasons she had limited his
authority to bring only two. actions, and posi-
tivdy forbade him bringing any more—that iu
contravention of these directions, he had since
brought other actions against no lecs than 19
different papers for the same _cause, without her
authority, directly or indirectly—that some of
these actions had been compromised, and that he
hut received large sums of money in lieu of da-
mages, without accounting with the plaintiff for
the same, and 'that the rest were now going on
without her privity, consent, or authority.
The Court, under these circumstances, granted
a rule to chew cause.—(Chronicle.)

MORRIS V. TIUNT.
Mr. SCARLP.TT and Mr. SMEDLEY spewed cause
against the rule obtained by the defendant for
setting aside the interlocutory judgment in this
case, for his portion of the expcncc of erecting
the Hustings in Covent-Garden at the last Elec-
tion for Westminster, at which he waa a Candi-
date, and . for which the plaintiff brought an ac-
tion. The ground of the motion was, that the
judgment had been obtained irregularly. It ap-
peared that the defendant had taken out a sum-
mons for the plaintiff to amend the particulars of
his demand, which summons was' returnable on
a Monday morning at eleven o'clock, the plain-
tiff not having attended to it ; and about three
three o'clock in the afternoon of the same day,
hesigned judgment as for want of a plea.

Coviir held the judgment irreEillar under

06
these circumstances, and therefore made r.r•
absolute.—Mr. Hunt supported his rale ior
son.—(Mid
1,41/

THB KING versus A. BUGLE FRENCH, BUlt°'
WELLS. .101
The defendants were brought up to receiire•raci
sentence of the Court, convicted of a
bof cOnsPiidir
to obtain letters of marque from Port-4,84:10P
'hich they captured a ship named the l'3,.(181
sailing under a British license. On a Wine
the defendants moved an arrest of judgme4; t fotl4
the Court held that they had been proper)
e (le
guilty of conspiracy. On this occasion hOO
tendants put in affidavits, throwing thelilseivr's
the mercy of the Court. The sentencerrreci
months' imprisonment in the House of 'l4° ite,
tier) for A. Bogle French and Wetl4.--;i15010
who was considered•the chief offender, wao,LOa
tenced to be imprisoned threcyears slw"
(Morning Post.)

CONSISTORY COURT, FEB. S.
LADY HERBERT V. LORD HERSSIVr ~ridge.
Thi;cause, which is one of nullity of l'l,-"°,
by reason of informality in the solernniz4l:;'lo
cording to the laws and usages of Sic",'d'frons
been long pending. A requisition was issued mitt'
this Court addressed to the Magistrates 50, 'toelo
cipal authorities of Palermo, enipoweri",di;
to examine witnesses, " diligently and seer" die
and in ,the proceedings transmitted frottliod,
Judges of that city, the Chancellor of the 61cioers
and his Britannic Majesty's Consul-General'
tba
were included no less than seven protests' °roe'
part of Lord Herbert, against the cour'ell-pliato
by them. The princ;pal ground of col P'
and upon which his Lordship's Coon° rroyet
Arnold and D. Swabey, founded their; 011
that these proceedings should be Poisile:,e'd °-
that instead of the witnesses being exam'he, 90
cretly, before - the Examines. or Judge 61°,110f the
cording to the custom and isijunctions bolovir
civil and canon laws, the substitute of lieft littedi
ship's Proctor was present, and they sub
therefore, that a new rt quisition be isoeu'll for
Dr. PtimtamoitE and Dr. LusulNGlll,:dingl/.
Lady Herbert, contended that these proee` tot
had been, in every respect, fair and ePeuoi Nsl
it the substitute of Lady Herbert's ()Wit, eror
present at the examination, it was from s roost,
coalition to all parties ; since in the eery
complaining of that irregularity, it w°s,o tyo
complained, that his Lordship's proctor °Je'),,igd's
not present ; that the word secret was 44
CustOla
signification, and varied according to the st ig
of different countries : the, examinatiou.'oo per,
took place, being doubtless in their ael'ige pre'
fectly secret, even though coliducted to oit's
Bence of certain other parties, besides tle`cool•
nesses and the examiner; lastly, the Learne to their
sel contended,,it would be very bard 0" of ,a 4
party, to compel them to bear the exPeu;itas°l
new requisition, when the suit had been
so long protracted; and at such heavy eosts'eor
conSsiirdteirra.tSioC,o3 TreTstesadido,n tahnati,tbiheectscisttiSein:cor,toth;
manner in which a commission to examine "d aisg
atle
witneases, had been executed. It was pie ;01
the stilastitutg of the Marshesa Oetavia oPreseof
falsely, caillnK herself Lady H9l)ert, Was 1:0 ICU'
tat lafni ey
cnseexaminations;encet, t
ti
its
tt
coldi titgaurtlety
the
eteia;
donee, thse terms-of the commission were violat
but if the mistake originated in an error enroll:leo
to both parties, the Court, without some
greater. inducement, would be very unwilliuS
increase the expences already incurred. of
After n luminous investigation of the natur-de
the informality objected to, and the loeolVicivil
tious in the administration of the canon 00° • of'
lair's in different countries, the 'learned Judge
firmed the proceedings. ',fore,
The evidence, which is of aninterestillg 11 tor'
was not ‘thii day gone into. Lady Herhe.l.li tbd
merly9ettivia Spinelli, is the daughter °f
Duchess of San Giovanni.—(Times.)
_ere"

. _._
A shocking accident occurred yesterday To'
noon in Piccadilly, occasioned by a horse wit,
in away with. a cart, in the care of a Cc,,lii
near Dover-street. In his career, 0, Moor
ing. away from one of the stages, t" l'`e, tool
side, one 'of the wheels came in coot3e.os o/
the panned of a chariot with such force', A
break it in 'pieces, and tear part of it 04,9.,•rebe
nursery-maid and three children were to 11:' or'
riot, and they -were - all 'mach hurt, but tileeoe''
vast in particular, who was removed in ''esl)o'l'
less state inconsequence of a fracture oo th The
One of the children was much lacerate°. orge
chariot belonged to Mrs. Pcuredge, of Ge
street, Baker-street.
COAL MARKET, 'EEBRU tin,- 3.' poce.4. 90
Ship to 9,s at Market. Ships sold. . A3_ I
1 1
28f .Newcastle ........1,-4 vs. 9( • .i7i• op
3 Sunderland 3 .. 3.16. Gd• t° 1.--s-
-1 Cinders .......1 .. . .... .. 265. Od. t°
[ 'WC"'
BIRTHS.
On the Ist instant, at Hythe, the Lady of Lieuten3
, Atli
lonel Goldfinch; C.B. Royal Engineers, of a sate Av 0. •
On tbe-,0 instant, in New o.riOond-street, the 1-'s"‘
drew Henry Lynch, Esq. of a son.
---,--------
- - fidi
°
DIED.-
On the 21st August, M
at eerut, in the East Indiecitie
Donhin, wife of Major-General Sir IL S. Doubin, tnt`' ,
af,
daughter of the Dean of York. , „ age
Yesterday, the ad instant, suddenly, John Willt,'4,>i,
oldest son of Mr. John Thompson, Duke-street, A"'' ,
----------- 0/,
PROVINCIAL BIRTH, MARRIAGES, AND DES, f sit
l
CI VTII.
Atilrynbella, Cheshire, on the ‘2tith inst. the 14"Ei °
John Sainsbury, of a son. of
....
11,1 A MULE). f4l. I,
Jan. 19, at Boulogne, in 14'r;ine, George Watson, „coil ,
the 3d (or King's Ownl Light •Drag•oons to Ann r,rovcl3,
eldest daughter of the late Joseph Martyr', Esti' °I-Greice 1; 3'
On 'l' uesday se'nnight, at Whitby Yorkshire, t:lcia'oge
Joseph Andrew, Minister of that parish,' to Jane' )
daughter of the late Mr. John Chapman, of Whitby'.
______

I

40 Mill
DIED.
On the 25th inst. George Parker, Esq. of Nev''- - 3 ¢
rioF
near Chester.
t . tigtoi ntdoany,
enet)irrnigh:gT last,ho a
s co p suddenly,ei
a 1d
, ojustf 1 asu
hull,
DireW ir VI); SV
f tbeig
cicty of Friends.
Lately, at Gainshro', Yorkshire, Mrs. Cooper, one to,o fir
people called Ranters. The whole of the socirtY . oie
her to the r..;-tare, singing to the Lord songs uf Pr3,v:of ti
his great kindness in bringing her tbroughthe trooh,c-
--o°7
world to everlasting bliss?'

LONDON: Printed byJ. B CARSTAIRS, of No. 1,59' W'-ieSrl
Ormond-street, Queen-s.ivare;' arid published 710 1,
SCRIPPS, of No. 7 South Molton-street, at "01,1el'i
°dice, No. 112, StTLcl; where Advetticementio
&CV, (pvit-paid; must