The Sun.
London, England, 1819-07-23 00:00:00

B E It KS II I It E.

ABINGDON, MONDAY, JULY 19.---This mnrning
the Oxford Circuit commenced at this place. Mr,
Justice HoLttoYD and Mr. Justice -RICHAPDSUN
entered the town at 11 o'clock, and opened the
_Cominission. They soon afterwards went to
Church, accompanied by the Sheriff, JOHN
SAW I'i-sit, Em., with the usual formalities.—On
their return, Mr. Justice RICHAIMSON took his
seat in the Crown Court, and Nlr. 3tistiCe 1101,
ROY I) presided at Nisi Pt ius. The calendar con-
tains tie names of 35 prisoners—an unusual num-
ber ; Imr the greater part of them are labourers,
eharg.ed with sheep stealing.. No case of any ge-
net al interest occurred on the Civil side to-day.
TUESDAY, JULY 20.
SEDUCTION.

JOHN!UMBER v. TIMOTHY TOW SEND.

This was an action brought by the plaintiff
againit the defend.-int, to recover a compensation
dama,ges for the ii,jury which the former had
gustdined by being deprived of the services of Mary
Eimber, his daughter, - whom it WAS aNeged the
rtelendaut had seduced. The defendAt pl.•aded
Not whereupon issue was joined.
Mr. Sit E R D opened the pleadings ; and Mr.
J tzv is addressed the Jury on the part of the plain-
ti;}.

The Learned Counsel said, that the plaintiff
was a respectable tattier, residing at Deitch worth,
in the county of lierks, and possessing landed
operty to the amount of 30001. or 40001. The
ridendata was also is respectable fernier, residing
•si in the pat ish of Hampton, in the county
Oxford. The plaintiff had a wife and six chit-.
riven, three daughters and three sons ; the eldest
daughter was married to Mr. Castle, a respect-.
able farmer at Grove ; Miss Mary Kinaber was
the second daughter ; she had acted as dairy-maid
to her father, and was about 26 years of age,—ln
the month of September, 16'15, she was on a visit
toner cousin, Mr. lt.Butler, of Minster Lorell,ox-
fordshire, and, in company with him, her-sister,and
whet ft leads, she, on the 20th of that month, met
•the defendant at Which wood-forest fair, which is
generally attended by most respectable people. She
was not acquainted with him, but she lied seen him
once before ; he was also about 26 years of age,
•and be insisted nr;on walking borne with her to
Mr. Malta's, a distance of four miles. On the
road he expressed a wish to 'pay his addresies to
her, and obtained her consent to receive a visit
from him at her father's house the following
Sunday week. lie came on that day, a marriage
,vas agreed upon, and he continued his visits about
Juice in every three weeks. Denchwurth was
abOnt 10 miles from Weald, and the defendant
sometimes came on horseback and sometimes on
foot ; he was always entertained by the plaintiff
and his wife, and received as the intended husband
of Mary Kimber. After some visits, the defer.
dant behaved in a very improper manner to her,
but she resisted his entreaties with ihe most in-
dignant feelings. He requested forgiveness, and
promised not to repeat such actions ; she fort; ve
hot he ceased to visit her front that time•—
About Christmas, 1816, Miss Klaiber was with a
Mr. and. Miss Harris, spending a day or two'wijh
a Mrs. Clinch, at Weald. On die evening of tbrir
arrival the • defendant came in, and he, with Miss
Kircher and,Aliss Harris,
.being left in the room
together, Miss Harris, with reference to his calling
at Mrs. Clinch's, es it was supposed for the pur-
pose. of seeing Miss liimber, observed to ,him,
" Now, Townsend, you have been to see Miss
Kimber once, and we.will now have it in black
And white, as, if you deceive her again, she shall
have part of your fortune." •- The defendant re.
plied, c",fhere is no occasion for that, I always
intended to have her." And, in a_ subsequent
conversation, he told Miss Kimher that he wished
and, intended, to s'tsit her again.; but she refilled
to receive him, saying,, he. had.
.better stay away,
unless cold() behave as he ought to do, and in-
tended to.marry her, lie then promised toil() so,
and it Nes, agreed between them that the court.
ship should be renewed. And,.at ..the request :of
the dele.mlant, Miss Kinaber . with, her .friends
snipped that evening at the house of the.defen.
dant . fat her. About..a month afterwards, the
defentlat4 went to Denehwurth ; .but, as Mis,s
Firnber was.poorly,she .did nut sere much of
three.weeks he went again, and continued . his
visits until the middle of. Mey,.1817. when, un-
tort unetely,. he. accomplished his purposes, and
Nis*. Kimber fell, a sacrifice to lilt, artifices.. In
the course, however, of his latter visits, helold
her sister, Martha Kimber, to get ready to be
ht idemaid, fur the wedding. would take place as
()an ao Mary ,wins ready, and he should
.wish her
to spend. a week with Mary at first : ire also told
her tiny Jolnt Clinch se-its to give Mary away.--.
On the Bth of June he viiiied Miss Kimber again,
end afterwards, without assigning, any cause, :to.
tay.left and neglected her. About six Weeks
After the last meeting, she wrote to him to knoW

tvl,y he did not call in see her; but he sent no
rep:y. She then addressed another lever to him,
Baying she was with child, end begzint: him to
marry her. That letter produced the following
rel;ly~

" August 17, 1817.
• " I received your letter permit me to send you these few
lines as a testimony of my tmedience to you, as 'tis the first
time of writing to your honoured self, I hope you will. he on
the pardoning side. I teecived your's of the 16th instant,
and was surprised lam sorry to say I cannot comply with
your request : it is out of my power at prcasant, fur age and
youth cannot agrer in our opinion (the Learned Counsel could
not tell what this meant), and from that reason liberty is
preferable to me. My opinion is. Out you think I go else-
where: brit I defy you, or any other person, to the contrary.
I here state, therefore, 1 Lope you will not censure things of
that hind upon your spirits, since agQ and youth cannot agree.
I have had bad expreAions upon the subject, therefore I lin?e
for tkr best ; the worst appears to take. place fast enough.
!fhere will come that time, I hope, when affairs will turn up
rar beyond expectation ; and if you sincerely wish to see me,
will come; but I should rather not; it will add great unea-
aincss.on both sides, therefore I wish to be excused. What
inure cats I say at prer.rsant, but to subscribe myself voirr most
obedient ? I hope you will attend to your Liitionkr9 in re-
spect of spelling.'

• Miss Kimber answered this letter, and stated,
-that she moch wished to see him,:but he took no
notice of it ; and she therefore requested her sis-
tel• Martha to call upon him, which she did in
Sept. 1517, in her %% NI)? from her cousin's. She
thtn !oh: h:rn, her sister diary wished much 10
ace him; he replies, ". Betwixt two stools ianist

effirvie In the groupd." • Ahr:laa kimber then ob-
served, " You mast be a pretty sort of a roan to
go to see two girls." The defendant said, "It
is too late to talk about that now, bu.t. I will
come and sec your sister." This conversation
took place on Saturday; and Miss Kimber, feel-
ing the situation she was in, and the defendant
not calling upon her, went the following Tues-
day, accompanied by her sister Martha, within a
mile of his house, awl sent a note-to him, saying
she much wished to speak to him. He came- to
them in the road, and Miss Kimber asked him why

lie left tier, an') the reason lie did not tell her of

his intention. lie replied, that he did not intend to
-leave her nntil weeks after he last saw her, but that
he did not know what to do, for he had been to
see anotlrm- girl, and he believed she was in the
family way also ; but he refused to tell her name.
Ile afterwards said, he hoped the other girl was
not in the family way, as it would be a -disgrace to
leave a gill iu such a state, and lie should not then
know: what to do ; but if both were in the family
way, he thought he could not marry either, as lie
should not like to marry one and leave the other.
Nothing further happened till the 25th of Octo-
ber, 1817. when Miss Kimber received tire col.
lowing letter, from hint :--
" Kind Liss,-1 thought proper to svelte to you, and from
the expiration of time, and the news I hear stated, I wish to
set your father, to proceed on tine bilsiness, for, I think it is
time. I shall be at Farris don Fair on ll'ensday neat,
!Pitney on Thursday, and Burford on Saturday. 'Then-dove,
if your father will see me, 1 will behave mv.elf as well as
possible it lay in ply power, and I hope he will likewise. You
and riot- father think I used you ill, and I think of your hi-
ther the same. 1 hope you and all the family a.e in good
health, as I am at prcasant. William Clinch brought the
news from Harney, and soon I heard of it; but. I !leg
In keep it secret. I hope you will return me answer by Mr.
Thomas Clinch. I beg to remain your most obedient,"
Miss Klaiber answered this letter by saying, her
father .would meet him at Witney on the 'Ulnas-
ti-ay ; and her father, accompanied by his nephew,
:%.Ir. Butler, did meet him ; when the defendant
proposed to marry her, upon his gi \lnf.; her 8001.
saying he was, or shook' be, worth double that
sum himself. The plaintiff told him, he would
give him horses or sheep, or he would give him
landed security; but Ire would not contiae him-
self to 8001. as after his death he should give his
children all his property equally between them,
and he would not for the sake of one injure the
others; and that lie would rather the defendant
had run him through with a knife, than have de-
bauched Iris daughter. The defendant said, that
he- had nothing to say against the plaintiff's
daughter, as she was a very good young woman.
Nothing was agreed on at this rueetin ; but in
November the defendant called on Miss Nimber, tit
her lather's house, anti said he was then very
low in spirits, haVing 'buried his father, but that
it should soon be odds'ai And it was time it was
°tided (meaning " settled," or that he would soon
marry :he daughter of the plaintiff). also
stated, that his father had bad a very great regard
-for her, and had, in conteinpirtidn of his,
ridge with her, left 4iitn all his goods ; that his
antic had left hid 10001 , and his uncle would
leave him 20001., and that in a few days he would
come and see her again. 1-le ttd :rot; however,
do so ; and on the 11th Feb., 1818, Miss Kimber
was Oeiivered of a male child. AbOut 7 weeks
ftrrwai:(l4 the defendant went to see her and the
child, and spent the whole day with her. No-
thing then passed as tothe marriage, in April she
wrote hint a letter, and received the following re-
ply in July : •
" Miss,-1 received your letter on tine Ath of April, and was
surpri,ed at your father not giving nie au answer hiroS:2lf,
without sending by Mr. Clinch the 'contents; lint such eon-
tentsare not what I wish; therefore I cannot, nor wrll not,
cuter into them terms; and as for a child's share, I wish to
know what that is. lam not 'ashamed to own what
hare; and, by that reason, I am surprised at your father's
offer. Soon after you, and I became acquainted, your father
and I was walking one Sunday afternoon; tie was saying that
he had lOU:it:Eel of land of his 'own, with paying a
strut or two, which induced me to continue—our acquaintance
as usually; and ray being led on by such fine Swills as theni,
has brought it to what it really is; .and.asfor.a person to pre-
,tend this thing or that thing 'when he knows to the contrary,
he ought, 14 lout he whin: sin he 101;0, be ash annul lit lint sel I
and for is person to lead another under such preteuces as
them, never ought to tire. Yet, there are them in the world
whicti talc great delight in leading 'YOuiig people into errors
of that tlescriptipa i• but 1 will nescr, give yvartp:-stieb pre-
tences while lam able tin delendanysell. I wish notrbing but
fair prziy;. yet, turning :all thiags aside, if yonr fattier will not
comply vit.l) any request, I hope you and him will act us yo.o
think proper, and as soon asicouvenient ; for I wish it settled
roars woy,or other to each of our advantage. I hope you will
return we au ansettras soon as convenient. From
" Your artist obedient, •
• • , • , . TIMOTIIY TOWNV.SEIND..
" I hope you antrall the family are in good health, as I
at Jr/Truant."

Miss Klaiber Still hoped nit 'the defendant
would marry her till the munth'ot November last,
when she heard that he was Married to Miss
CoOke, who resided near Burford,"in Oxfurdshire.
This ease would,:he, proved in evidence to the
Jury; and it would then remain for them, under
the,directious of the Learned Judge, to give 'such
compensation in damages as they thought the
plaiotilf,wacentitled to receiee.,.
Mary Ktraber said, that,iBls she lived as
dairy-,maid with her father. At IVlrichwood-Po.
rest Fair she met the defendant ; he'said he wired
to' pay his addresses to her, and to marry her. He
visited her Several times, with the consent of her
father and mother, his intention to marry her
heiirg made known to them. On one °Coil:don,
Li the course of those visits, he made some impro-
per advances to her, which size repulsed ; be then
promised never to repeat such actions, but he dis-
continued his visits. At Christmas, 1816, s:e met
him at Mts. Clinch's, when he renewed the court.
ship. lie continued to visit her at her father's
house till May, 1817, when, by holding out pro-
mises of a speedy marriage, he accomplished her
seduction. On the Ilth of February, 1318, she
was brought to bed of a boy; -the child was still
living. The defendant afterwards renewed his
promise of marriage, telling '4l,er it should soon be
odds'd ; hut in November last he Married Miss
Cooke. The witness then proved the teeeipt of
the several letters from the defendant.

-On cross-examination, she said that. her father
occupied a'great many acres of laud ; she could
not tell how many were his own ; he kept several
cows, and she,wal dairy-maid.
Martha Kimber said, that sire was the second
tiaught,r of the plaintiff. The defendant visited
her sister Mary,with the knowledge and ASSelfit
her father and mother, and declared that he in.
tended to marry her. - He said to witness," Miss,
do you take care to be ready as bride-maid; it is
to be as soon as your sister is ready : John Clinch
is to be the father," (meaning that be WaS to glee

' Ler sister ovay.) F lease then dWeti to visit her -
he came but once afterwards. At Christmas,
1816, they met at Mrs. Clinch's, and the defendant
then renewed his visits at her foither's house, At
the request of her sister, she went to the defendant
in the month of September, 1817, to beg he would
call upon her, when he slid, he was afraid there
was another girl in the family way with him ; and
if there was, he would have neither of them, be-
cause it would leave one in disgrace, and hQ could
not forgive himself. Her sister was brought to
bed in February, 1818, and the child was still
living. In November last the defendant married
Miss Cooke.
Richard Butler, nephew of the plaintiff, de-
posed, that in October, 1817, he was present at a
meeting between the plaintiff and defendant at
Witney. On his entering the room, the defend-
ant, alluding to a treaty of marriage between him
and Miss Kimber, addressed him in these words:
" Your uncle and 1 cannot agree. I ask hint
SOK. and he thinks that too much. I think 8001.
a fair sum, because I expect to be worth double
that stint myself." The plaintiff said, he would
give hint holies or sheep, or land security, but
that he would not confine hiMself 800; ; he
would give his daughter Mary a chit's share.
•The defendant then said, "B— you and your
daughter too." The-plaintiff was io a great rage,
and the WitinS interposed to prevent any violence
bet ween them. Piai (It ff said to defend .1 n t " Thee
blotch my danghter ! I'd sooner thee simuldst run
a knife through my hotly than blotch my daugh-
ter." The defendant then said. " 1 did not b--
you and your daughter too." Witness said, " Yes,
you did. I must contradict you." He replied,
"If 1 did, lam sorry for it. I have nothing to
say against the young woman; she is a very good
kind of girl."
On cross-examination, the witness said, be did
not recollect that his uncle said to the defendant
that he would ruin him.

Mr. TAUNTON addressed the Jury on behalf of
the defendant, lie -observed, that he and his
Learned Friend (Mr. Shepherd) who was with
him in this case, had given as little trouble as pos-
sible to the plaintiff's witnesses, and hi particular
to the young woman who was the object of this
action. The only questiOn he bad asked ..her re-
lated solely to the property and situation in iity
of her father ; for, in the instructions Which be
had received,. he bad been desired to steer clear
of any observations that. might affect her future
credit and welfare in the world.- 'I he present ac-
tion was of a very simple description ; it Wits to
recover damages for the injury which the plaintiff
had sustained by having lost the service 'of his
'llallgliter during her confinement; and the Jury
would estimate %vhat.the amount of that injury
was. It was a clear principle of-law, as well as
au acknowledged rule of justice, that where a de-
tendant had been'guilty,of an injury, he sho,ild
not pay twice fen. it ; and, there:foie, iu this 'Case
the Jury should Only include in their verdict the
very precise damages to Which the plaint fl was
entitled. This was not an action foi a breach of
lirrinrise of marriage ; it was nofan tics inn brciught
by the daughter ; it was an action in Which the
daughter WAS stated to he the servant of the fa-
ther ; and the lay: declared, that if the 'slaughter
be not at the time of seduction an inmate in the
house of the father, no inch action can'be Main-
tained.
Mr. Justice IfOtßorn said, except it he proVed
that'she intended to rc..tirrn to her father's ser-
vice.

Mr. TAUNTON admitted that thrs.goalifiestion
was correct, and tharikeil Lis tbrdship
stated it. It Strengtherie3 the argunient whiCh Poe
had urged, inasMuch'as it showed that lOst'of ser=
vice was the only ground of damages in actions
like the present. lie repeated, that he had no
Intention to cast any reflections opon the chat'ac-
ter nth] conduct of Miss Kiniber, but 'be wished
the Jury to consider all the circumstances of this
case in a 'calm and dispaiSionate manner. Jr ap-
peared that "the'parties met at a tair at Which-
Woo;l-fOrest, in September, 1815. The:). Met
accidentally, and the defendant paid 'ids 'ad-
ilreSses Miss Kimber on an honour,thie foot.
'She becanie dknleased with bii beha-
viour, and here their 'acquaintance was broken
jiff. At Owist.tiias, 1816, Miss 'KiMber and
tiersisterigartha went to Weald, in
.
'where the defendant lived. It was stared, that
they went to spend a day or two'with -Airs. Clinch,
hitt it could not lie doubted that their object 'was,
to reivew their intimacy with the defendant. They
itipped, 'indeed, at the hotise of the defendant's
father,and'from that time till May, 1817, when
that hali'pened which'was the occasion of the pre.
sent action being brought, the defendant conti-
nued to'viiit Miss Kimber. Let the Jury, then,
loOk at the seduction in this case : what proof
ryas there of an artfurgaining over of the young
woniari in order to secure her affections ? It Was

obvious that he was not the only 'guilty phrty.—
Wbat were the ages of -these persons ? At the
tittle in question she was 22; he was also'22, and
living with his father, whose farm' be Managed.
In their ages, then, they were upon an equality,
and the passions Were as strong in "the one
ss in the other. This ,was not the case of a
man of 30 or 40 seducing an inexperienced girl
of 15. Miss Kiinber had stated, that'Sbe'liad once
repulsed the defendant for improper behaviour;
she ought then, when she renewed her acquaint-
ance with him, to have been more upon her guard.
And here (exclaimed the Learned Counsel) I must
beg to 'say. a few Words with respect 'to the gene-
ral policy of actions of ibis sort. In my opinion
they are not the best gttatds for female chastity.
A young woman, in balancing whether she shall
yield to the solicitatiOns of a man, or to'the gra-
tilicstion of her own passions, may say, "1 can
either make him marry Me, and make me an ho-
nest woman, or I can make him pay liandsOme-
ly." The present is a' sort it `action which has
multiplied upon us very greatly of late years ; not
'that !Inman nature is ;Vealter‘than it alivays has
been, but because there is more artfulness in the
conduct of ruing women. It had been said that
the defendant, in this case, after he had accom-
plished his object, had abandoned the female.
On the contrary, however, it was proved is;
evidence, that he was willing to have lbar•
vied, hers hot Jer father_ relust to ,come fors
ward with such a fortune as he had induced she
defendant to expect. This was efident from the

•
lettel•i, *bleb had been react, in one of vrll--;et :''
defendant said, " Youth and age cannot agrc-ii,it
an expression ivhich the Learned Counsel°llbst
other side had affected not to understand.
0,0
was the sum whith the defendant askedll.otie
only 8001., not to be paid intoredidtelY, but
secured on the property of the plaintiff. Thien- °did
therefore, would rerneniber, that the defet,"-i bo
not wantonly cast aside this young wotton
was willing to make the best reparalo"
power for the injui yhe had done. WS
was since dead, and lie bad married Wo'l -ncei
But the Jury would consider all the cheilmsr:-led
of the case, and not suff
er themselycs CO!O "-
away by the excess of their feelings. '6l
Mr. Justice flobnovn summed up the case
toll the Jury that they were called upon "), „Filo;
.F he plaintiff a compens-ation in damages-for "l'ievA
jury he bad sustained by losing his danghters,:dolt
vice.
,The action was not brought by the Yivr
woin?si ; her .-:•rorinti of action ,could be ,101%vel
breach of promise of rnarriagt!: only, to hel3';oot
by other evidence than her own. They o'er,' 041
to take into consideralion any damage whicapore.'
bad sustained, except in so far as it went
hitter the feeling's of the plaintiff, and to tlial.lllo
his fortune, by having his d'augliter left °"041
hands. There appeared no impugn!. colidlif 7- het
the pars of the fa!lier and daughter, excel° ,fie
going to see the detendaitt after the in.titllaCi ore
br eked off. 13,:t the y udd take Ole ill6ct
of the case into their consideration, and givels
damages to the plaintiff us they thought he -
entitled to receive.
The Jury deliberated for s'!ort on'Afit
oei,
delivered a verdict for the plai:itiff—Datuagti"

WINCHESTER, Juur 2t. f 0
Yesterday Mr. Baron GIZAHANt and Mr, lidsoce
Brt,T arrived here about two o'clock, an"' "edeti
dining with the Very Rev. the Dean, Pr(lec:iot
to open the Commission. This morning,
Divine Service, both Courts entered upon the
siness of the A.,sizes.
The calendar of prisoners is unnsuallY sThao
extending to
,only 44 in number, and by
greater majority of 'Cases of a comparative'Y ad,
;ling nature. It is, however, to he regret7aci
that the country keeps pace in early (1613(1°,14
with the metropolis ; and although the luee°"ie
is not so striking, npwards of one halt `ha%
lt,adly passed their 20111 year. The most s'ir't
eases are those of two women, one oge"oti
charged with the_ murder of her infant soon nfp
the other, aged 38, charged with the doo" to
new-born infant by a premeditated expoiu,taa
the inclemency of the weath.er. There is 0'9,1,
third case, which Mr. Justice Best stiono
bided to in his Charge to the Grand
drawing a distinction between manslaughter fl.Ol
murder. It is the case of Jul4n Mod.
19, who, about a week since, presented 3 V--clf
by way of threat to a person, having previ7;:st
supposed that he had extracted the boll. di%
unfortunately was not the c.:ae, and tire r
!orating the liver, caused instant death. 0
On the Nisi Prius side the lmsiness has for 3•b
ceeded the general expectation ; very iew.o,`4,
'were calcula'ed upon, but thirty-four er}tl§;
ed, three of which ate Special 'intim There,t;)
however, hardly a arse which seems calculnieflos
claim any great share of public attention.
Rtl
trial of the great questiun between the Dt;"" ,301
Chapter of IVinehester and Mr. Peming, tbe
Sheriff of the County, respecting the right tIJ tit
soil, as Lord or Lord Paramount of the g
Debit), is gone over to the next Assizes, as -
also sonic other imporeantl'inestions.
Seven causes %vete disposed of thi3 rlorntnq
but none of them of any public interat.
Law being the business of this ancient rift
mote respects than one, it may not be arising dr
notice, that the Judges had a narrow cse'lrfisse
hearing divine Service unattended as usual oft
Cmporation with the Regalia it happeedno
Monday, that a sequestration was enforced
the Corporation property generally, but norio,
the return from Chula, when the Mace, &c',
was impounded with the rest of the v.11114)10'

HERTFORD, JULY 21. bi?
Four vises were tried to-day, two of ".;
were undefended, another was referred, 0"
fourth was the follown:g

CARTER AND ANOTHER V. ANDERSON. of
This was an action of trover by the assigilee,,'ver
a bankrupt, named William Curter, to re",o
eight dozen of ehret, which the dilendatit 410
“Hedged to have unlavtully converted to bisecee
use.—The Jury, under the Learned Judge's "sr"
Lions, found for the plaintiffs—Damages 3OL

SIDE. .ta
In this Court the follOwing.nrisi,ners Were
and convicted Barnard, for btraliti:ri
horse' at flitehio, the property of John 14;,"er;1t0,-,
Joseph Charles, for stealing a mare"at Hat fielifi ji*
property ot WObarn Pratt:herr; and Richard
for sealing a lamb at Hatfield, the inoperti°ll
Dlaryuis of Salist;urv.

sras ballot-;;ballot-;;0,4
Wednesdfty '$ _might, as Captain G---f)
ti
ballot-;; at i\larvp'rt, got out 0; 00
depth, and was unfortunately drowned.
body was not found till late the spur
Captain ASA3RIDG E, who was in compallY

bins nearly 'Oared the same fate.
ANY
. PT -..-
:), 1311.1'115. . opelf
On Moncti.e.:4l, the Lady of John C.onstnb/e, 13f. ICei
Street, of a tL,•olrcr. /100
'Vt•storday, at he Lawn, South Llrnbcth, the Lad)? °
Faisett Burnett, E6q. ut a dirughter.-
_/'

f ISIARIIIr,n.
. -
PIIII
On MondayOnst, At St. Nlary's, Newinzton-butts, her'
iefluoi
Benjamin Tolkien, of the Norwicn tiniim•otiice, "77000.1;
place, 1p Elirithuth Frances. ridest daughter of isif• 1
Carter, of Clibrch-row, Newington-hutts.
—.../".

DIED. f aid
Yesterday, at Hammersmith, John Harter,* EVl* 4.)1
4avendish-street, St. Mary Mame, iu. the 78th Fear °
age. cif
On Monclay, the 12th inst. Mr. John Bodroan, at big
ter's house, Bury-street, fit. Mary-axe, aged 3(2•
:‘
LONDON,: Printed by J. B. crutsTAms, of No. w
Ormond-street, Queen-square; and publislird Jcc,
SCRIPPS, of No. 7, South Molton-street, at T,-,“dr."
Odice, No. 112. Strand ; where Adveitisenient4?
Letterer 44c, (post-paid) muit Iddrcaficd.