The Sun.
London, England, 1821-05-15 00:00:00

CUNTRACTS FOR COALS AN!) CANDLES.

COMmissariat Department, TreaSury
Chambers, 14th May, 182 i•
SUCH PERSONS as pre desirous of con-
tracting with tire. Agent for Commissariat Supplies, to
furbish for Twelve Months, from the 25th ;lune next, such
-Qua ut it ics of Coals and Candles as may froar tio:e to time he
required for the under-mentioned Barracks, may receive
„
articulats, of the. *Contracts no applying at this Officebe-
-1
oween the hours of Teraand Fotir ; to Deputy Commissary-
Literal Young at Edinburg!: ; and to the respective Bar-
r
11a ll 14/caters in the Islands of .(Iciernsey, Jersey; and Alder-
p' and deliver their Tenders at this, Office, as follows, viz.
„ enders for supplying Coals, sealed up, and marked
stlfenaer for Coals," until Twelve o'clock on Tuesday, the
. .
,enders for supplying Candles, sealed anti marked
~,
tlider for Candles," until Twelve o'Clock on Thursday the
betit' ju"e but no proposal,' either for Coals or Candles, will
"tjeed, unless made On or annexed to a printed Particn-
. ,r' aud the Prices inserted in words at length ; nor unless
i:Hivtter property,ne to such proposal from Two Persons of
t 4rwll p engaging to become bound with the party
:tin:tering in the stun expressed in the Particulars, for the
If Tenders
of the Contract.
Tenders are sent by Post, the Postage must be paid.
Each of the following Counties to be tendered for sepa-
rate)
Y, and all the Barracks in each of these Counties to be-
-"Pi lien-under one Contract, (except the Barracks in Port-
t-street and the Regent's Park, which are to he supplied
Pth Coals under a separate Contract), viz. Bolts, Devon,
Hants, Kent, Middlesex, Sussex, and the Isle of
'*Parate Tenders and Contracts to he made and entered
40 fin each of the Barracks at the following Places, viz.
,tirteton,,cheater, Macclesfield, Stocisport, Pendennis, Scilly,
Ijuro, (Candles only), Carlisle, Dorchester, (Candles oaly),
~,'.eYrnottth, Sunderland, Stapleton, Isle of Man. Manchester,
Blackburn and Bolton, Burnley, Rochdale, NorWich, Yar-
-4:,1111, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, Northampton, Nottingham,
d, Taontort,ipswich, Landguard Fort, Croydon, Keve,
rmi"ghatn, Coventry,. Hull, and Leeds and Halifax, Hod-
' erstield, Sheffield, York, aril Scarborough. •
tielosl),* Barrackares in North Britain at whickNeweastle.or San-
t! ").Coals used to be tendered for together ;,and the
.r Barracks in North Britain in which Scotch Coals are
1,,%
u,lO. be in like manner tendered for and supplied under
ontract.
4411 the Barracks in the three Islands of ,Guernsey, Jerscy
1.41 Alderney, to be supplied under one Contract.

l'his Day was published, in Bro.-price 2s. boards.
. ':.Substance of, the SPEECH of the Right
„LORD ELDON in the HOUSE of LORDS ou
u.F.SDAY the .17111 of April, 1821 , on the Motion 'for, the
:ECOND READING of the BILL intituled An Act to
I.a.orit:r for the Removal of certain Disqua!ificatiOns, under
rhieli his Majesty's Roman Catholic subjects labour, mid to
~'"g'llate the intercourse between persons in Holy' Orders, rut
essing the Roman Catholic Religion) with the, See of

Printed for J. Hatehard and Son, 187, Piccadilly.

%/ft
.erinesdav the frith, will be published, in 4to, with
Maps, Charts,.Plat es, &c. 31. 13s. lid.,
'''',IJRNAL of a VOYAGE-for- the-Drsco-
-1,-AN.;',ERY of a Nom-wEsT. PASSAGE from the AT-
-1gio;'1(: to the PACIFIC, performed in'the years of 1819 and
dart of 'n Iris Majesty's ships Heela and Griper, under the or-

11v WILLIAM EDWARD PARRY, R.N.
* uthority of the Lords Commissioners of the Admiralty.
At it
'e same time will be poLiished,,plinted uniformly, 4t0.,
"Ins. 6d.,
NORTH GEORGIA GAZETTE and WINTER
-tlit ',,`'NICLE, a Newspaper that was .established on hoard
edited employed in the Discovery of a North-West Passage,
*"
By Captain EDWARD SABINE, It. A.
Printed fur John. Murray, Alhemarle-street.
••••••._

'rib Isel),„..'OD by AUCTION, by Mr. WELLF.R,
11,e 17th Mav, 1821, at the BEAR INN, HAVANT,
()n° O'Clock,
Capital FREEHOLD RESIDENCE, call-
of „• " ItELVIDERE HOUSE, fully equal to the reception
44)1741-KY family, replete with otlicus of every di scription,
l house, stables, capital gardens, with hot and green
tiii4,lB,es, Pleasure grounds, with 14 acres of meadow land, in-
the scite, &c. situate in the delightful village of Bed-
injv"ii, 4, the c liPation of the proprietor, Miss Brady.
~siituatioll is peculiarly healthy and heiit,tful, command-
ttre most delightful views of the Isle of NI ight, Spithead,
tit t!,111e Harbour, only half a mile from the sea; the richness
Post land scenery is truly picturesque, only a mile from the.
41outi"1, of Havant, 10 *from Chichester, and 8 from Ports-
c'f. from which coaches pass every day fur London,. Bath,
'lv f,,l'icliester; the neighbourhood-respcet Able, a fine Colin-
-14.,444r..fie1d spot is, about 10 miles from a capital. pack of fox
i• The fixtures to be taken at a valuation, and the
liari "11'5 in like manner, at the. election of the purchaser.
134,1 ,Possession will he given. Printed Particulars may be
till l the George, Portsmouth ; Crown, Gosport; Anchor,
litt. Red Lion, Petersfield ; Red Lion, Wareham; Bugle,
Itir""eidt Dolphins, Southampton; Plough, Cheltenham;
W,,,C,'Llt Prining-ollice, Bath; Libraries, Brighton,
%Al..7li?gr and Bognor; CroWn, Arundel; King's Arms,
aloc4l•Lning; White Hart, Guildford; Red Lion,- Dorking;
licit44l Mart, London ; Messrs. Stevens and Longcroft, So-
11,1,°'s, Havant ; and of Mr.IVELLER, Chichester, of whom
"As for viewing the Premises maybe had.

IMPRESSED with a just and humane sense of
the calamitous results arising from the injudicious treat-
-1(1.,„*It "f a certain malady; contracted in a manner too well
;:fiWti to require comment, and often eitWling on its un-
tipt)! v!ctim a series of distressing and almost insupportable
qintlett"ns Dr. EAI)Y respectfully calls the attention of those
tested, to his peculiar and most effectual method-of care
4igi Ilse the adwertisin-g empiric of the day, or the equally ert-
r44l conduct of those " who hold the word of promise to the
pieptl.break it to our hope." Dr. Early will not presume to
hb,ge Infallibility in every description of case, but as far as
Plied aid, assisted by. medical and surgical sliill•can be ap-
ti,-e", he promises a certain, speedy, and permanent restora-
it. !t ;
tihaving made every species of Syphilitic affection, and
4i°VaOUS train of diseases, the rimary objects of his profes-
-941 studies, and being flattered by the tratiscrudant success
totnelt has accompanied his mode of treatment during the
witz,Pe of a long and laborious practice, he is enahl.ed to ~ffer.
fivin the fullest confidence, pretensjons at once the most !lope-
illo.tuld encouraging. Innumerable instances can be adduced
Cen_strative of the superiority of Dr. Eady's sYstem, which has
11found to prevail even where eminent talent, tetained
_l?Uhlic institutions', has been ineffectual. In addition to
or",suencaottisolatory advances, Dr.Eady will be found equally
Of ,t.t.e..)e in reviving the slutoheriog and
. debilitated ente.rgirs, krr'et:. I.tnnan constitution, which embitter, and if uot. noe yf
tkist_Lens frequentl:, render nugatory the very principal o
From this desolating state of ianity and ste,
If re-animating the frame and Wording tonne and elastwityyfittn
c4eee.laxed organs, Dr. Early is happy to convey the most
tesriri and positive assurances that the sill-FPI-yrs orbutli 1110,4,nA rest".-4,--41; a steady perseverance in the means
.elong only required.—Dr. Eady is consulted daily, at
Count rYcletlB' Dean-street, Soho, by p•atients of bolls sexes.-
8,
,Fis meet respectful attention.
str?_)-1; au Street, Soho, is 'a private House, opposite Meal d's
neLeit.. 4:ne
.end of Dean Street leads into Gerrard Street,
the General Two-penny Post Office, and the
vxtord Street—Advice gratiS to the Poor.

order, and to supportahe'due execution oLthe Laws.
- •Q 2d, -That they Will employ their influence, individually
and collectively, in 'discountenancing and opposing the dis-

semination of seditious principles.

" 3d, That they will encourage persons of integrity and
talent in the Literary-Wwhl to exert their abilities in confut-
ing the sophistries, disiipating the illnsions, and exposing the
falsehoods, which,are 'employed by wicked and designing men
•
to mislead the people.
4th, That they will resort to suelt,lawfal measure; as ma;•
be deemed expedient to restrain the publishing and circu-
lating of seditious and treasonable libels.
In order to attain these -end; it has been determined—

" 1, To establish a Fund, by the voluntary contributions of
the members, at such rate as each individual may think fit.
" 9, To appoint a Committee for conducting the business
of the Society.

" 3, To adopt a, system of Correspondence with those mem-
bers who lire at a distance, and with such Associations as may
be willing to co-operate in promoting the same objects."
Most earnestly does this Society call upon all men, of all
ranks and of all political parties, upon all to whom the main_
tenance of civil and religious liberty is dear, upon all who
value the internal peace of -the country, or the permanence

of the British 'Empire, to join them in a strenuous endeavour
to stem the torrent of those disorganising and demoralising
principles, which would level to •the dust the fabric of the
Constitution. and bury under its ruins all the comforts; and
enjoyments, all the charities and endearments of social life.
CHARLES MURRAY, Hon. Sec.

Subscriptions continued.

Rll C (b); the Treasurer)
It R
S

L. S.
20 0
-- 5 5
5 0
1 1

Rainier, Captain PR N . - 5 0
Ranking, Joseph, Esq - - - 2 0
Rawson, J'«'. and C Esqrs - . - , 5 5,
Ray, Richard,.Esq - .: - 2 2
Reed, Archibald, Esq - - - 2 0
Reeves, .John, Esq - - - 10 0
Reynardson, Major General, 'l' Birch - 2 0
Reynirlds,. Henry Revell, ESq - - 5 0
Rice, Hon and Rev Dr . . - 5 0
Rich, Robert, Esq s. . .. - 2 2
Richardson, William, Esq - - 1 1
Robarts, A Esq- - - - 3 3
Roberts, Rev Richard - - - 3 3
Roberts, Mrs Ann • - - - 1 1
Rogers, Rev 'l' M • - -, - 20 . 0
Romney, W K - - - 2 0
Rosa, Mrs General , - - , - 2 0
Ross, Colonel - - - 3- 0
Rot hwell,'Rd Esq Aid Treasurer - 5 • 0
Bothwell, Thos Dutton, Esq - - - 5 5
Ronne, John, Esq . - - - 2 2
Row, Wni son Esq . - .- 5 5
Ruekei-, I) H Esq - . - - 5 5
Russell, •Right Hon Sir H Bart - • - 10 0
Russell, .1 Watts, Esq M&' - 10 10
RuSsell,.Mts - - - 2 2
Salisbury, Bishop of - - 3 0
St David's, Bishop'of - - .. • 1 1
Selsey, Lord - - - - •10 0
Seymour, Lord Robert - - - • 5 0
Sewell, Sir'JsKt LLD: President - - 21 0
S B
SS - - - 5 0
T-.-- - 20 0
Salmond, Colonel - - - 5 0
Salt, J S Esq - - - 5 5
Sawyer, Charles, Esq - - 1 1
Sayer, Benjamin, Esq - - - 5 5
Sayer, Charles, Esq - - 3 3
Scott, Vice Admiral • • - 1 0
Scott,. Captain George, RN - - 1 1
Scott, Mrs - - ‘. - 1 1
Scott, Mrs - --- - - 1 1
Seaman, Richard, Esq - -, 5 0
Sharp, .1 B-Esq. (Hon Assistant Secretary) - 2 2
Sharp, Mri - - - - 1 1
Sharpe, Rev Lancelot - - - .3 3
'Shaw, John, Esq. • - , 2 0
Shedder), George, Esq - - - 5 5
Shedder,, Robert, Esq - - - 5 5
Sheffield, Sir Robert, Bart - - 10 0
Sherhorne, Robert, Esq - - - 3 0
Sikes, Henry, Esq - - - - 5 5
Sikes, Rev Thomas - . - urn
Sikes, W Esq - - ' - . - 5 5
Singleton, --, E. - - - 2 • 0
Skerritt, Mrs General - - - • 2 0
Smith, Christoptter, Esq. Alderman, MP. - • 5 5
Smith, John, Esquire - . - 2 2
Smith, Joshua &Intl'. S Esquire - - 2 0
Smith, 'l' EsqUire, (Porthill) - - I ' 1
Smith, 1' Esquire (Brentford Butts) - 21 0
Smith, T junior, Esquire, (Ealing) - - 10 10
Smith, T junior, Esquire - - Annual 2 2
Smith, 'l' Esquire, (Whit echapel) - - 3 3
Smith, Mrs 'l' : (ditto) - - 2 2
Sneyde, Nathaniel, Esquire, M.P. ,- - 1 0
Snodgrass, Thomas, Esquire - ~ 10 10
Sparks, Robert HArry, Esquire . - - 3 3
Spencer, Captain, H. H. R. N. - - I 1
Spencer, Knight,.Esquire - . - I I
Spode, Josiah, Esquire - - - 5 5
Starkey, Reverend John, D-D . - 5 0
Stephen, George, Esquire - - 2 2
Sterry, A Esquire - - - 3 3
Sterry, SII Esquire • - - - 8 S
Stockwell, John,'Esquire - - - 5 0

_ . .
Stoddart, John, LLD - - - 5 0
St onestreet. Reverend G G - . - 21 0
Storey; William, Esquire '.. - - 2 2
Stratton, George Frederick, Esquire - - 2 0
Strickland, Walter, Esquire - - 2 2
Sutton, Reverend Frederick Manfiers . 3 8
Sutton, Robert, Esquire - - - 1 I
Sweetland, John, Esquire -, - - 5 0
Sykes, Godfrey, Esquire. - .. - 5 0
Teignmouth, Lord ' - - - 5 5
'F P . • .. - - - 10 to
T Y - - - 3 0
Taylor, G. Watson, Esquire, M.P. - - 20 0
Tharp, John. Esquire. : - - - 5 5
Thomas, Sir George, Bart - .. -1, 0
Thomas, Reverend Vaughan - - 1 I
Thomas, William, Esquire _ - I I
Tower, Reverend Charles - - - 1 I
Trevor, Right Honourable John - . 5 0
True Liberty - - - - 10 10
"'Trutt) *ill prevail" - - - 1 1
Turton, John, Esquire - . - 5. 0
To rton, William, Esquire - - -- 5 _0
Tweedale, , Esquire .., - - 2- 2
T - - wining, Richard, Esquire 2 2
Twining, John, Esqni; e . - - 2 '2
Twining-, R. Esquire, junior ' - - 1 I
Twopeny, Nowell, F.4qu ire - - - 1 0
,
Twopeny,Reverend Richard - _ - i I
Vansittart, George, Lsquir. a - . S 0

I Vivian, Major .1 R A -
Welling on, Duke of. - -
Wincbelsea, Earl of - -
Walsingliam, Lord - -
Williams., Lady'Handyn - ..
Waterloo Club, Norwich . -
W B - • - -
117 D - - - _
WE- - - -
Waleot, William, Esq -
By ditto, sundry Subscriptions -
Wallis, Dr - -
Walker, Sir William - - ' -
Wahnsey, Rev. 'l' .T -
ward, George, Esq -
Ward, George, Esq (4tl Subscription)
Miro, Henry, Esq - • • -
Warner, D H Lee, Esq - . -
Watkins, Reverend 'l' - - -
Watson, Sir Charles, Bert -..-
Watson, Joshua, Esq .. -
-
Weatherby, Edward, Esq - - -
Webb, Frederick, Esq
- a - 10
Welch, A D Esq , - - 2
Wells, John, Esq M.P. - - 10
Wells, Rev. John - - - I
Wenham, Tboinas. Esq - - - 5 0
Westminster, Dean of - 5 0
Whalley, Frederick, Esq. - - - - 2 2
Whateley,-John,. Esq - - - 1 I
Wlweler, Charles, Esq and Sons . ,
-
White, Reverend Dr - - - 5 0
White, Henry, Esq - - , Annual 1 1
Whitfield, John, Esq . - .. - 2 0
Whitsbed, •Adteiral Sir J H - - 5 0
IVhittard, Thomas, Esq - .: ... 1 1
Widow Lady, a - - - ~. 50 0
Wigram, Sir Robert, Bart M.P. t- . 10 10
Wilbraham, E B Esq M.P. .. - 5 0
Wild, John, Esq .. - 5 0
Williams, Vice-Admiral Sir Thomas - - 3 3
Williams, Lieutenant-Colonel - - 1 0
Williamson, Reverend Thomas - , - 5 5
Winstnnley, Richard, Esq - 2 2
Wintle, Reverend Thomas - - - . 2 0
Wise, Reverend W. D. 13-. - • - - 2 0
Wix, William, Esq. .. , .. - 4 2
IVonastun, C. B. Esq - - . .. 6 0
Wollaston, G. H. Esq - - - :- 3 0 •
Woodburn, H Esq - .t 3 • 3
Woodhead, J Esq - •• - 1 . 0
worsley, Reverend R - - - 2 0
Wreight, Henry, Esq - - 1 1
Wrench, Reverend J G ... . - - 1 0
Wrench, T G Esq - - f - 2 2.
XF-.. - - 5 0
XY-- - - 5 0
Xiinenes, Sir Moris - . .. 1 0
York, Archbishop of - . - .. 10 10
Youge, Reverend Duke - - , 5 0
Young, Admiral Sir William - - 15 5
Young, William, Esq - - - 5- 5
Z Y X - - - - 41 0

The naines.of additional Subscribers will be published, and
Donations and Subscriptions will be received by the Trea-
suier, Richard Rothwel!, Esq. Alderman, No. 10, King-
street, Cheapside; by the principal Bankers in-London and,
Westminster; and by the following Bankers in the Country,
VIZ..--

LElcEsTeßmintE.—Leicester, Clarke and Philips, Mans-
field and Co. ; Ashby de la Zurich, Fishers and Co. ; Hinck-
ley, Sansone and Ulakesly ; Loughborough, Thorpe and
Middleton.

Dt.RßYSHlßE.—Ashbourne, Gisborne, Brittlebank and
Co; Chesterfield, Crompton and Co.; Chapel in le Frith,
Gisborne, Brittlebank, and CO, ; Del by, Samuel Smith and
Co. Crompton, Newton, and Co. ; Wirksworth, Arkwright,
Toplis and Co. •

•
_ •
N nTHAmPT oN sHin E. —D aventry, Charles Watkins and
Son ; Northampton, Smith, Hall, and Co.; Oundle, Daniel
Jaunts, and C. F. Yorke ; Peterborough, Daniel James, and
C. F. Yorke ; Thrapston, Eaton and Eland ; Weilingbo-
rough, nrton, Rodiek, and Co. .•
NOTTINGHAMSIMIE.—ManstiCd". Wylde- and Bolger;
Newark, Godfrey. ;and Hutton : Handleys and Co. ; Notting-
ham, Samuel Smith and Co : J. and J. Wright and Co.: ltet-
lord, Cooke, Childers, and Co.; Southwell,Wylde and Bolger;
Worksop Cooke, Childers and Co.

. • •
WARivicKsurßF..—Atherstone, W. 0.-and \V. H. Chap-
man ; Birmingham, Smith, Gibbins, and Co. : Attwoods,
Spooner, and Co.: Wooley and Co.; Coventry, Little,Wood-
cock, and Son : Lant, Bunney, and Co.: Rugby, A. Butliu
and Son ; Stratford-on-Avon, IVhitehead,Weston, and Green-
way; Warwick, Whitehead, Weston, and Greenway.
WESTMORLAND.—KendaI, Wilson and Co.
YORKS,IIIRE.—BarnsIey, Beckett, Birks, and Co.; Bever-
ley, Bower and Co.; Doncaster, Cooke, Childers and Co.:
Leathams, Jackson, and Co.; alifax, J. W. and C. Rawson
and Co.; Htulderstield,J. W. and C. Rawson and Co.; Hull,
Pease and Liddell : Robert Wilkes and Co.; Harrison, Wat-
son, and Locke ; Knaresborough, Harrison), Terrys and Co.
Leeds, Beckett, Blayds, and Co. ; Mahon, Bower, Dues-
hery, and Co.; •Ot ley, Thomas Shaw, Esq. (Surgeon); Ponte-
fract, Perfect and Co.: Lcathams, Jackson, and Co.; Rich-
mond, Hutton and Co.; Ripon, John Coates: Britaius and
Thackwray ; Scarborough, Lister and Co.; Wakefield, Lea-
thaws, Jackson, and. Co.; Whitby, Simpson, Chapman, and
Cu.; York, [taper, Swann, and Co.; Wilson and Co.
CUMBERLAND.—CarIisIe, Chalks Forster and Co.; Pen-
rith, William James, Esq.; Whitehaven, Johnston, Raney,
and Co.: Thomas Harrison and Co.
DORlTAM.—llinlington, J. Backbouse and Co.; Darham
J. Backhouse and Co.; Ridley, Bigge, and 'Co.; Soutt:
Shields, Chapmans and Co.; Sunderland, J. liachhouse
and Co.

LANcAstrrac.—Lancaster, Thomas, Wors wick, Sons and
Co. : Live► pool, Leyland and bulimn's; Manchester, Heywood
lhother, and Co. : Jones, Loyd, and Co.; Pi eston, Claytons
and Wilson; Pcdders, Newstiam, and Co.; Ruclidalei.l. W.
and C. Rawson and Cu. ; Ulverston, Fell, Bu► ton, and Co. ;
Warrington, Par, Lyon, and Co.; IVigan, Thicknesses and
Woodcock.

. .
LINCOLNSIIIRE.—rostun, Gee, Clarhe, and Co. ; Brigg, W.
On;ton; Hoßret+, Gurneys and Co.; Lincoln, Ste ith, Ellison
and Co.; Sleaford, Peacock, Handley, and Co.; Stamford,
Eaton and Caley.
NoTTlNcnAmsruinu.—Mansfield, Wylde and Bulger; Ne-
wark, Godfrey and Hutton; Handleys and Co.; Nottingham,
Samuel'Smith and Co. ; J, and .1. Wright and Co.; Retford,
Cooke, Childers, and Cu; Southwell, Wyldc and Bolger;
Worksop, Cooke, Childers, and Co.
Noftrom—Aylshant, IL. and E. Copeman ; Diss, Fincham
and Co ; Fakenham, Gurneys and Co.; Harleston, Gurneys
and Co.; Lynn Regis, Bagge and Bacon ; Gurneys and Co. ;
Norwich, Thomas, Henry, and Wm. Nay ; teys and Co.;
Gurneys ;
,Swatfham, Day and Co ; Gurneys and Co. ; Yar-
mouth, Sir E. K. Ltcon, Bart, and Co; Gurneys and Co.
SurFoLx.—Beccles, Gurneys anti Co. ; Bungay, Gurneys
and 'Co.; Bury, Edmund Squire, ,lames Oakes and Son ; Ips-
wich, Crickitt, Bacon, and Co.; Woodbridge, Crickitt,Bacon,
and 1t ood.

Essex.--Chelmsford,Crichitt and Co.; Colchester, Criekitt
and CO.; Ma!don, Crickitt and Co. ; Roniford, Joyner, Sur-
ridge, and Co.; Saffron Walden, J. Mort luck and Suns; Ep-
ping, Joyner and Cu.;
CAMBHIDOESUIRE.—Cambridge, Mortlock and Suns;
Ely, J. Mortlock and Suns; Neu'utarket, Eutun,-Haninionc.l
and Son. . .

Er.x.r.—Cantetlinry, Baker and Co. Hammond and Cu.;
Deal, May and Co.; "'over, Lest ham, Rice and Co. J. Miurt
Fectur and Co. ; Fay, rsham, Henry Wreight ; Gravesend,
Brenchley and Co.; Alan ate, Cobb and Son; Maidstone,
Edmeads and Co. Currall and Co. ; Ramsgate, Burgess and
Son, Austen and Son ; Rochester,' William Wildash, Book-
seller ; Sandwich, 'Emmerson and Co. ; Sevenuakes, E. Jar-
dine, Esq.
Sy Ray.--Chertsey, T. and G. LaCoste; Docking, Piper,
Dewdney, and Co. • Godalinitr, It. Moline and Sons; King•
stun, Shrubsole and Lambert.; 'negate, Piper, Dewilney and
Co.

Susspc.—Brighton, Hall, West and'Browne,Nlieliell, Mills
and Uu., Vigneys and Co., Lashiner and Co. ;!sham,
Michell, Mills, and Co.; Hastings, 'l'. Breeds and Co. ;
Holahan', Pilfer, llewdney and Co.; Petwortit, Stoveld and
Co.; Rye, Curttis, Crrugliton, and Co.

• • - - - •
Also, at the 01F:cc ut" the Association,. No. 6, New Bridge
Street, Blackftiars, London; where all Mini. communicat ions
may be addressed by letter to " Mr. J. B• kiunurary
Aisistartt Secretary."

The Earl of LAUDERDALE presented a Peti-
tion from the Merchants of Hull against the Tim-
ber Duties Bill.
GRAMPOUND DISFRANCHISEMENT BILL.
The Earl of LAUDERDALE said, that previously
to the Order of the Day being read, he had to
submit a proposition to their Lordships, which
was, that a Committee should be appointed to
report the names of the-Mayor, Aldermen, and
freemen of the Corporation of Grampound, dis-
tinguishing those against whom evidence of bri-
bery had been given, from those against whom
no evidence had been given. His Lordship then
proceeded to make some remarks on the• prin-
ciple of the Grampound Disfranchisement Bill.
He thought if their Lordships had fairly consi-
dered the case, they never could have been in-
duced to vote for the second reading of the Bill,
which appeared to him one of the most unjusti-
Oable measures ever assented to by Parliament.
He would not dwell on the singularity of the
case. The Bill did not act on any case of cor-
ruption which had taken place at the last elec-
tion for the borough, or at the one previous to
the last, but it went as far back as the Ist of
February, 1816. He was ready to admit, that
all those electors who had been proved to have
received money ought to be considered as cor-
rupt. But, according to the evidence on which
the Bill professed 'to proceed; it appeared that,
of the persons against whom evidence had been 1
given, only 19 possessed the right of voting,
whilst there remained 25 electors against whom
not a tittle of evidence had been given. Since
1816, seven new freemen had been added to the
Corporation, so that the number of unitnpeached
electors amounted to 3'2. Certainly a more ex-
traordinary principle never was • acted on than
that of making these innocent individuals suffer
for the misconduct of others. It was said that
the Bill before the House was not a Bill of Pains
and Penalties; but for his part he could not see
the least distinction between this Bill and a Bill
lately under the consideration of their Lordships,
which he had heard abused and reprobated as de-
structive of the Constitution in stronger terms than
he had ever known to be applied to a parliamentary
measure. He contended that the elective fran-
chise was vested in the freemen of Grampound
for the same object for which the privileges of

he illustrious lady who was to have been af-

fected by the Bill to which he had just alluded
were conferred upon her, namely, the public
good. He had heard it,said that the people, in
their present state of suffering, were most anxious
that some improvement should take place in the
state of the representation. He,. however, did
not believe this to be the case. lje was once an
earnest parliamentary reformer himself, but the
moment be changed his opinion on that subject

le was just as violent on the other side. Ilere

he would observe, that he should consider him-
self as the most despicable of human beings, if
he did not avow any conscientious change of
opinion on ,political- subjects, and state the grounds
upon which such change proceeded. The peo-
ple were suffering under grievances which had
no relation to the state of the representation ;
but they were ready to grasp at any object which
was held out to them, as the cause of their misery.
Many -persons, in both Houses of Parliament,
had talked of the benefits that would result from
reform ; but he believed, if the people were
canvassed from one end of the kingdom to the
other, the great majority would be found to con-
sider Mr. Hunt a better judge of the subject than
any of its parliamentary advocates. The present
measure, if carried through parliament, would
not satisfy the reformers,,but would only have
the effect of making them pursue their schemes
with increased energy. , His Lordship concluded
with moving, that a Committee. be appointed for
the purpose stated at the commencement of his
speech.
The Earl ,of • Cie VAR voN said that he never
was a Parliamentary reformer in the abstract ;
but..when a case of gross and habitual corruption
in the exercise of the elective, franchise was made
evident, he would always approve of the, princi-
ple which Parliament had frequently adopted,
and. vote in favour of a measure to prevent the
recurrence of the evil. The Hon. Earl, after
stating that there were 41 corrupt electors in the
borough, and only 32 uncorrupt, concluded by
expressing his opposition to the motion of the
Noble Lord.

The Loan CuANcELLOR began by observing,

that it was unnecessary for him to make any apo-
logy, as his Noble Friend had, for any change
of opinio❑ on the .subject of Parliamentary Re-
form. Ever since lie had been in Parliament he

had been decidedly of opinion that nothing could
be so extremely dangerous as to make any partial
reform, unless on a principle which could be
maintained whenever the general question came
under consideration. The present Bill was com-
pletely irreconcileable with the law and consti-
tution of this country. Other measures of a si-
milyr nature-had been founded on mistaken no-

tions of the law and constitution. It had been
contended that the Bill was not a Bill of Pains
and Penalties, or an ex post facto law ; but in his
opinion it was both to every intent and purpose.
If their Lordships meant to act justly, they could
not apply this Bill to Crampound without pass-
ing an Act to tell the whole country• that the law
with respect to bribery was completely changed.
What was a Bill of Pains and Penalties if it was
not the present, which inflicts on innocent men
the punishment due, only to the guilty ? and a se-
verer punishment too than the law had provided

' even for the guilty. He maintained that the
rights of individuals ought never to be visited on
corporations. This was a principle which -had
always been acted on is the courts below. 'The
right of voting was given to the corporation, but
the benefit belonged to individuals. Upon this
principle he was of opinion that if any of the
freemen of Gran-Ipound had been preVented from
voting at the', ate elections, they could have
brought actions for pecuniary' damages on, the
ground, not of trust, hut of interest. What
would be the effect of the Bill in a -moral point-
of view ? Would it afford ground for a corrupt
majority to say to the other electors, why do you
continue uncorrupt, we can only be disfranchised•
for being guilty, and you will also be disfran-
chised for being innocent ? It was contrary to the
Laiv and the Constitution that the Elective Fran -
chise should be taken from a borough where the
majority of the electors was proved to be cor-
rupt. The trust would remain in the majority of
individuals after-iirrailArsiktr:the electors Who
had acted corruptly. Believing that the incion
of the Noble Lord would proucermuch of the_
information which he desired to see in possession
of their Lordships, he would give it his support.
—(Hear, hear !)
The Earl of LIVERPOOL wished to say a few
words on the question before the house, because
he believed it was proposed for the purpose of
defeating the -object of the Bill altogether.--
(Hear, hear !)—lle would not enter into the
question whether the Bill before their Lordships
was a-Bill of Pains-or Penalties or not. If he
found that Bills of Pains and Penalties had been
recognised by the Constitution, it would be only
necessdry to consider 'whether a Bill of that na-
ture would apply to the present case. The
elective franchise was conferred on the corpora-
tion, not for the benefit of individuals, but as a
public trust ; and when Parliament should be of
opinion that this trust was abused, it became the
duty of Parliament to withdraw it. The ,pri-
vileges possessed by the Corporation of Grain-
pound stood on the same footing with the pri-
vileges of their Lordships. If any Peer were
found guilty of gross corruption in the discharge
of his public duties, he might be deprived of his
rights ; and this had been done. Ile might be
told thatin.such a case 'the gllilty alone was pu-
niShed; and not the innocent. But the principle
was the same where a body acted by the majo-
rity, and where the reform applied to the majo-
rity. In former cases Parliament. had given to
the uncorrupt-electors the right of voting in the
hundreds. If it should be thought necessary,:a
proposition to that effect might be made In the
committee on the Bill. His Noble I',i7riend ob-
jected to all Bills of this nature ; but he (Lord
Liverpool) was friendly to such Bills, though an
enemy to Parliamentary Reform. The doctrine
of his Noble Friend would prevent Parliament
from adopting any remedial measure, in a case
where only two or three ..electors might remain
uncorrupt out of several hundreds. In short, it
was his decided opinion that where systematic
corruption was•proved against a borough, it was
fit that some remedy should be applied. Ile
stated this without reference to the number of
electors which a place might contain ; and in
the present case was convinced that the remedy
could not be found by throwing the borough into
the hundred. One of the greatest advantages
possessed by the Constitution Was the variety
which occurred in the nature of election, by
which every class of the community was fairly
represented ; but the extending -the right of
voting for the borough of Grampound to an ad-
joining hundred, instead of promoting, would
counteract that end. lie proceeded* on no the-
oretical view. The true rule of conduct in ques-
tions of this kind, in his_ opinion, was-never to
reform on speculation ; but when any part of the
elective system was found corrupt, to take means
to.correct it. When an evil was clearly proved
to exist, nothing could be worse than shutting the
door against all remedy. He supported the pre-
sent Bill, not because he was a Parliamentary
Reformer," but because he was tin enemy to all
plans of general reform. He would never make
any alteration on theoretical principles, but would
never refuse to pay due attention to any case of
abuse which might arise. Their Lordships had
already recognised the principle of this Bill by
having passed several Bills for a similar object ;
and they had now to consider whether it was fit
for them now to retrace their steps. If they re-
fused to proceed with the Bill, it could not he
because the case was one which deserved to be
treated with less severity than others, for no
woke case of corruption had ever occurred, lle
therefore thought that their Lordships ought to-
go into the committee:

Earl HATIJURST differed on this subject frorn
his Noble Friend who had 'just sat down: lie
opposed the Bill because it enacted the complete
disfranchisement of Grampound, and did not, as
had been done in other cases, throw the bo-
rough into the hundred, or, to speak more cor-
rectly, as he thought, the hundred jute the bo-
rough. Had the same measure been brought
forward by this Bill'as was proposed in the case
of Barnstaple, it should have had lils suPport.
He preferred extending the right of election to
the laindred,:because that was:not extingnishlUg
the borough ; but in, tke present case nothing
less than extirpation 'was intended, and what was
taken from,one place was to be given to another;
an advantage was to be corderred on person.;
svho.hitherto had not possessedit. Tbe principle
thus. acted on was mischievous, and NVas'calcu-
lated to open a door to Parliamentaryfavour and
jobbing. To give th.e selection of the
.Placerta
:be represented to the Crown, was an-driatigerneut
_whiclunight be.attendcd with eangerous cense-

skinences. His Noble Friend had however-ex-
plained that he meant This selection to take place,
'only after Parliament had deprived a place of
the right of voting ; but what he objected to was
the disfranchisement of a borough at all. Of
'the two modes of transfer whiCh had been sug-
gested, that of giving two additional Members to
`the county of York was the best, because it cre-
ated no new right of voting. He however objected
to the Bill altogether. •
Lord REDESDALE was against the measure be-
fore the House, which appeared to him to lead to
the system of the French convention, or the di-
viding. the. country' into departments, in order to
found representation on the basis of population.
It seemed to him impossible that their Lordships
could proceed with this Bill without acknow-
ledging the principle" laid down by the French
convention. lie opposed the Bill, therefore, on
the ground of its introducing this new principle.
If that.principle were once.admitted, their Lord-
ships would afterwards find it very difficult to
give•answ6t`t9ithe demands set up by the advo-
cates of .gener.6l Reform. The Bill did not" fol-
low- the precedent already adopted in similar
'Cases, and.-therefore ought to be rejec'ted,
The LORD CHANCELLOR rose to put the question, and
• read Lord Lauderdale's oration. -
The Marquess of LANSDOWN observed, that the Motion
just read had for its object to ascertain the number of persons
who had been guilty, and the number not guilty of corruption ;
but any question Might arise 'on that subject had no
reference to the objection of the Noble -Lord who spoke last,
and the Noble Secretary of State ; for they opposed the Bill be-
- cause it proposed to transfer the right of election, instead of
"throwing it into the hundred. That was a question for the
consideration of a Committee ; and the Noble Lords ought
therefore to support the motion for committing his Bill.
The Earl of LAUDERDALE replied in support 'of his.
motion.
Earl BATHURST read the preamble of the Bill, and ob-,
serVed that he could not agree to go into the Committee, as file
two leading objects of the measure were the disfranchisement
of Grampound, and the transfer of the right of voting ; to nei-
ther of which he could accede. If the House went into the
ComMittee, it would be necessary to alter every clause of the
Bill.

The question teas put on the Earl of Lauderdale's motion,
which was negatived without a division.
The Order of the Day for the House going into the Com-
mittee was then moved.
Lord SIDMOUTH observed that he had originally wished
that the Bill should come to a Committee in order that the
propositions it contained might be fairly and fully discussed ;
but on considering the object of the measure, and the manner
. in which the Bill was framed, he saw that it was impos-
Sible for any person to agree to go into a Committee who did
• -not adopt the principle that the Borough of Grampound ought
• to be disfranchised. He wished Ghat the proposition had been
to throw the Borough into the Hundred, which would have
been acting on experience.
The Marquess Of LANSDOWN rose to move the postpone-
, ment of the Committee to ,Monday next. This motion he
thought ought to be agreed to, as matter of common courtesy.
From what passed on the second reading, it was understood that
the Bill would be debated on the report, or on the third reading;
. at least it was not intimated that it would be opposed on going
into the Committee. In consequence of this understanding, ten
or twelve Peers were absent, who would have attended had
there been reason to expect that the House was to come to a de-
cision on the Bill that night. He trusted, therefore, that their
Lordships would agree to the amendment he meant to move,
• namely—that instead of now, the Bill be committed on Mon-
day next.
Earl BATIIURST had no wish to take the House by sur-
prise, and therefore would not oppose the amendment.
The LORD CHANCELLOR also intimated his assent to
. -the delay.
The Earl of WESTMORLAND declared that he would
oppose the Bill in every stage.
The amendment was then agreed to; and an order was made
for summoning their. Lordships on Monday.—Adjourned.
. .
HOUSE OF COMMONS.
Mr. *DENISON presented a Petition from the Inhabitants
'of St. Marv, Newington, against the Newington Select Vestry
Bill.—Ordered to lie on the table.
Mr. DENISON then presented another Petition, which he
Observed was of a very extraordinary nature. The Petition
which had been presented by the Inhabitants of St. Mary,
Newington, against the Select Vestry Bill, was signed by 1,965
persons, the Petition from the Rector, Churchwardens, (lover-
riors, Guardians of the Poor, tte. in favour of the Bill, was
signed by only 106 persons. Of those 106, however, it appear-
ed that not a few had been induced to sign by a misapprehen-
sion of the objects of the Bill. He held in his hand a Petition
from one of those individuals, of :the name of James Corner,
who complained that he had been misled with respect to the
real purpose of the Bill, to which he was decidedly adverse.—
The Petition was read, and ordered to lie on the table.
Sir R. WILSON presented a similar Petition from William
Copeley ; Mr. Whitbread, one from George ; Sir W.
De Crespigny, one from George Ives ; and Mr. Lambton, one
from Thomas Clarke ; all of which were read, and ordered to
be laid on the table.
On the motion of Mr. JOHN SMITH, the Committee on
the Bankruptcy Laws Bill was postponed to Thursday.
On the motion of Mr. ScARLETT, the second reading of
the Poor Laws Amendment Bill was postponed to Monday the
'2lst instant.
Mr. H. SUMNER presented a Petition from John Clatton,
in favour of the Newington Select Vestry .Bill, and complaining
of the extremely riotous conduct of the Vestries in that parish
for some years past.
The Clerk was proceeding to read the Petition at-length,
. -when
Mr. CUR'%VEN rose to order. He objeCted to the Petition
being received, on the ground that it went to state transac-
tions which occurred in a Committee of that House after
strangers were excluded, and of which Petitioner could know
nothing.
The SPEAKER decided, that the Petitioner being the agent
of certain persons concerned in the Bill, had a right to state any
matter which he might have learned from a Member of the
Committee, as having taken place after strangers were ex-
-eluded.
Mr. HUME said, he wished to know whether the Petition
did not contain the following words :—" And the Committee
decided contrary to the usage and practice on such occasions,"
and if so, whether that was not a Breach of Privilege ?
Pa The Clerk read the Petition a second time to the House.—
On the question that the Petition do lie on the table,
Mr. CURIVEN said he felt it his duty to oppose it. If they
received such Petitions they would open a wide door to Com-
plaints against the proceedings of Committees appointed by that
.louse. The House was about to divide, but
Mr. CURIVEN having withdrawn his opposition, the Peti-
tion was laid on the table. •
The Marquess of LONDONDERRY rose at the same time,
to address the House, when
A Message from the Lords announced that their Lordships
had given their assent to several private Bills.
The Marquess of LONDONDERRY brought up papers
containing a copy 'of Viscount Castlereagh's dispatch to Sir `V.
A'Court. Orderer to be printed.
The Marquess of LONDONDERRY and Mr. H. SUM-
.NER again rose together, but the latter being called upon pro-
-:seeded to address the House. He said, that however import-
-ant he might conceive the Newington Vestry Bill to be, he
--could not at that hour detain the House upon what was called
private business. He was anxious that there should be a full
attendance on the discussion of this question, and therefore lie
would bring it forward to-morrow at the close of the private
business, and before public business commenced.
Mr. DENISON asked his Hon. Colleague (Mr: 11. Sum-
.
ner) what line lie meant to take with respect to this Bill. Ile
(Mr. Denison) was most anxious that the question should be
sifted to the bottom. :(Mr. Sumner did not answer.)
Sir F. BURDETT expressed a hope that the question would
not interfere with his motion to-morrow.
Mr. BENNET said a few words which were inaudible in
the gallery. '
The Marquess of LONDONDERRY said, he felt it his
duty to move that the Order of the Day, " that the House
do resolve itself into a Committee of Supply," be now read. -
After a few words across the table front Dr. LusiiixoroN,
Sir J. NEWPORT wished to know what course was to be
-taken with respect to the Bank of Ireland Bill, which stood for
a Committee that•night ?
-Serjeant ONSLOW observed, that the
:second reading of the
' Usury Laws Repeal Bill also stood for that ev_ating, and he
•-was-most anxious that it should be fully discussed.
The SPEAKER said, it was competent to any Member-to
press a motion which had precedence, though the usual courte-
-sey of the House was to give way to business of treat im-
:portance.
Serjeant ONSLOW bowed to the decision of the Speaker,
,end would fix to-morrow for his motion.
The Marquess of LONDONDERRY observed, that there'

was-no 'other public businest of so much in: ortahce as the
Committee of Supply. Both the Usury Laws Bill and the
Bank of Ireland Bill Might 'be postponed without inconveni-
dite.—The house had already lost an hour and a half in dis-
cussing private business.
Sir J. NEWPORT said, all he asked was., that the Bank .of
Ireland Bill should not ,be brought on 'at so late an hodr as to,
prevent its being discussed in a full House.
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said, that it
was not his intention to bring the Bill on at a late hour. When
it went into a Committee, he trusted he should satisfy the Hon.
Baronet upon it. •
After a few words from Mr. BRIGHT and the Marquess of
LONDONDERRY,
Mr..DENISON asked his Honourable Friend (Mr. Sum-
her) when he intended to'bring on his motion ?
Mr. 11. SU3INER said, if the Bill was to pass at all, it must
pass immediately, as the lateness of the Session would not allow
of delay : he would, therefore,_ fix his motion for Wednesday.
Mr. BENNET begged to know from the Honourable Mem-
her i(3lr. Sumner) what he was about to.propose in this Bill ?
—( Hear, hear !)--Mr. Sumner made no answer. •
On the Order of the Day_ being again moved; Mr. CREEvEY
gave notice, that he would, on Thursday the 24th instant, bring
forward a motion relative to the four and a half per cent. Bar-
badoca Fee Fund.