The Sun.
London, England, 1810-02-13 00:00:00

~.

S
,
ar

TUESDAY, FEBRUALr 13, 1810.

This Day:was pnhlished, price" 23. 6d.
HE FREE KNIGHTS .; or, the Edi& of Char-
lernagne.. An Operatic Drama. in Three Aas.

--
•• - By F. REYNOLDS, Esq. -;
Now performing with 'great Applause at the Theatre Royal,
Covent garden.
Printed for Westley and. Parrish, Strand.
• Of whom may he had, '
The Four first Numbers of the Watchman.

DOMESDAY.. •
THE REV. WILLIAM BA\VDWEN proposes
publishing, by Subscription, in Ten Volumes Quarto,
A :LiteralTranslation of the whole of,,DOMESDAY BOOK
with the modern Names of Plac6s, adapted as far as possible
to those in the Record. Art Index will be given to each Coun-
ty, and a Glossary with the laSt Volume. Two Guineaslo be •
paid on the delivery of, each Volume.
N.B. Any one Volume may be subscribed for. separately.
Subscribers' names received by the Editor, .at HootOn
Pag-
nell, near Doncaster; d. IVilson, Esq. Manor-House,
Ut-
ley, Yorkshire; W. Sheardown, Doncaster; Messrs, Long-
man and Co. Paternoster-row"; .-ond W. Miller, Albe-
marle-street, London; and by- every Bookseller in the
kingdom.
The Volume`already published;.containing the Coiin of_
York, including Amounderness, Lonsdale, and Vurness,
Lancashire, and such part of Westmoreland and C umber.
land as-.are contained in the Survey ; also the Counties of
Derby, Nottingham, Rutland, and Lincoln, may be had of
W Sheardown, Doncaster ; and Messrs. Longman,- Hurst,
Rees, and Urine, PaternoSter.row, -London.

IMPERIAL PARLIAMEN't.

HOUSE OF. PEERS,
MONDAY, FEBIth AR Y
Mr. Brougham was heard for the appellant in' the
Appeal, Gordon v. Duff .
Lord CONNING!! A m presented-a petition from the
Roman Catholics of the county of Clare, praying to
be relieved from the disabiliiies that will hang over
them.—Ordered to lie on 'the tlible.

,
Lord HOLLAND presenttd a PetitiOn from the
Debtors confined in the Mcirshalsca Order-
ediirison.— to neon the table.

, The House resolved itself into a Coniniitte'b ozi
Mr. H. Wellesley's Jjivt'ice Bill, . and *hen the
olatve.Ava4 read, tending to deii.r.ive Lady Charlotte
Wellesley of the enjoy ment of the Settlement made
.on her at her marrtage,

The Dukeof Non roLK rose to oppose it) 'he did
4-lot think it tiFlit that their" Lordships should pro-
ceed in a judicial capality toa inflict a punishment
which the law did not acknowkdge is applicable to
persons convicted of
.dultery.
The. LOiD,CHANCELLOR.acInOwIedged 'that the
plinishthent mentioned by the Noble Duke was not
sanctioned by the Comnion Law, .but that the clatise
was introduced pursuant to a standing order of the
last SeSsion.- The objectinns of the Noble Duke
were (et tainly well worthy of consideration, although
the amendment - moved by his Gr9ce had also in it
something objectionable. There Were other settic-
nients stated in the clause which the Noble Duke's
-amendmat
.did not. embrace y.ttt by entertaining
that atnendment would lead the. House to determine
also upon those gettlemenk with th,-i nature'of which
the House were not acquainted. lie shoun there.
fo:c suggest to the Noble Duke. t 'COtlvenence of
deferring the censi6ration of the amendure'ut for
the present, and allowing the Noble Chairman to
report progrest; On a Indite day (Thursday nest),
if convenient, tie woraltkbe prepared to give an opi-
nion 'upon the-tit-test:on:
The Dike of NoRE:n.,K willingly acquiesced in
the 'suag,:stibit, as lie ',had only, a. public principle in
view, and was not—acqn(ii;;tcd with either .(.,f the
parties concerned in the pi(.:s,,mt