The Sun.
London, England, 1817-08-11 00:00:00

igfoniff:tiori, envy
its ; but, I.llowing the ex;imple of the
French Papers, why it Oiciolit hive printed the
latter part of the nilicle ih !critics, in Order to ex-

cite paytianhir notice, or. %%hat ittipririance it at-
taches to that part, and should require from us ari
explan4tion Of what we consider as a Contemptible
dtticle altogether, tve,sliall. not puitle otirselveg
to discover, but shall leavt: ilie explanatiOU tb the
sagacity. of the Chronicle.

We have hitherto conceived that the Paper, jitir:
porting to be a Protest from the Austrian Princesg

MARIA fAotnsA,which has excltrd Initch attention,

and newspaper controvetsy, was a recent faliri-•

cation, but the conductor of the Anti- Gallicari
Monitor of yesterday declares, that though he does
not pretend to say that the Proteit is a gentling
document, nor can he say. that it is a forgery,
yet that when he was, in Paris he saw a Protest
of MARIA Louisa, in the :summer of 1814, and
that he received letters from Vienna, dated•Ja-4
nuary 1815, stating that MARIA Louisa had pre-;
sewed a Protest to the Congress, and that this
was all he kneW of-the subject. He then refers
to his riaOrs of February 19, 1315, and to April
23, of the same year, in which he stated, thalhe
knew of the existence of a Protest from the Acts-
TRIAN PRINCESS, 60 ridiculously, as well as most
unjustly, stile(' Ex-Empress of France, in which
she made the same demands acid aSseeted the same
pretenSions—deniands and pretensions which, if
submitted to the Congress at Vienna, ought to
'have been spurned away. with contempt, trotwiths.
standing the rank of the person from whom they
issued. We should have hardly patience with this
same Austrian Prjiicess if it were really the case
that she presented such a falseandflimsydocomeyit
to the A LLIEt) SOVEREIGNS, antl should pity their
WeakneSs and stupidity if: hey did not reject it atoned
with indignation. For what does it imply'?--W by,
that if gangs of. infamous and barbarous rebels
should overthrow their respective Governments,
and drive their Sovereigns into banishment, and if
a more artful, but not less hiutal herd of mis-
creants should possess themselves of the power of
the State, and at length be removed by a Military
Despot, .ill the lawful rights of these Sovereigns
are wholly 'extinguished, and that if by a provi.
dential train of events they should recover pos-
-1
session of their leeitiurate Thrones, they are to
resign them to a race of ittfamous llsorpvrs. Snell
is the s'obstatiee-of• the senseless, but most impu-
dent Document in questin. As tl,e Congress
at Vienna have been accused of having entervil
this DOcument on their Protocol, and as it
has excited so much discussion among the people.
of this. country, it would not be beneath their
dignity if they were formally and pubiiciy to dis-
claim having given any sanction to such an oot.;.
rage of common sense, and such a gross attack
upon the legitimate rights of Sovereigns. Be-
sides, it the people should unhappily be brought
by rebellion, massacre, and all possible horrors;
under such an unfeeliog and unprincipled Tyrant
as that front which France, by the combined Po-
tentates of Europe, roused and concentrated
by the gloriOus perseverance of this cotintry,
was .happily delivered,--are such a people to be
left withoUt relief, when they pant to gut rid of the
hideous yoke, and for the restoration of their:.
lawful Rulers ?.1t is impossible to suppose that
the document in question should have received tilt
sanction assigned to it by report, ami that the re.-
spective Sovereigns, did not. attempt to convince
the Protestress of the folly of supposing that her.
claims and pretessioos would not excite the, cort
tempt and indignation at mankind. Perhaps;
after all,,,though .the Editor of the Anti-Gal:bean,
Monitor saw a Protest' and received letters
from Vienna in the following year, the Protest re-'.
ceritly published will prove, as we at first con-
jectured and ventured to state, a vile fab,ica:lo„l
of NButretArAwrc's Emissaries, who are spread all
over the Contintiot, and are constantly at work
in their efforts to overthrow the !louse of
BOUREION• "

For " PROVINCIAL JOURNALS" Sec Last Page.

We finft of our competitors still con.
ceivc that Sir F. IIui;DETT visited Iveland hone
a political-bias. Wide as we are from the poli-
tical principles of the Baronet, we should have
condemned him indeed if he had deserted a friend
under a chtir,;e which involved his life, and, what
ought: to be- Mill dearer, his honour. We rather
respect the Barone; for his motives, than impute
them to eny political source.
Last night, about nine o'clock, the PluNce'
REGENT :Arrived at Carlion-house from I.lr;gliton...
Yesterday her MAJESTY atvi Princess ELIZA-.
nETH visited Viscountess crtEmoßts:F. at her resi-
dence at Chelsea Farm : they dined with her
Ladyship, and in the evening returned to the
Palace.

On Saturday the Princess CHARLOTTE and
Prince LtnroLn had a select dinner-party •at
Claretnont..The Duke of LEEDS, the Marquis and
Marchioness of AISERCOEN, and Count and COU11.•
1.Q56 LiEvE,N, were present.