The Sun.
London, England, 1828-06-07 00:00:00

• rt.

; •

rr *

•, '~

~ ~ ~~

SHIPPING INTELLIOENCE,-(THIS DAY.)

FROM LLOYD'S.

DEAL, JUNE 6.—Wind S.W.—Arrived the Tropic,
from the West Indies ; Duke of Sussex, Whitehead, from
China, sailed the 13th of February ; Princess Charlotte of
Wales, Biden, from India, sailed the 3d of February.__
Arrived from London, the Albina, Vowes, for Demerara ;
Norval, Conhro, for Quebec ; Brunswick, Blake, for
Quebec ; and Esther, Robinson, for Bombay. Arrived
the Harmony, Turner, from Jamaica.
PORTSMOUTH, JUNE 6.—Wind S.W.—Passed the Se.
sostris, Bouchier, from Bombay, sailed the 30th January,
and from the Cape the 6th of April ; Inglis, Serle, from
China, sailed the 28th of January, and St. Helena the
24th of April.
SHOREHAM, JUNE 6.—Arrived off Port, the Marquess
Wellington, Chapman, from Bengal, sailed the 6th of
February, and Madras the 26th—she has landed her
passengers.
BRISTOL, JUNE 6.—Arrived the Superior, Leslie, front
Rio Janeiro ; Bernard, Gardner, from Jamaica ; Jane and
Barbara, from St. Vincent's ; Venus, Phillips, from Bar-
badoes ; Hercules, Warren, from Cuba ; Lustre, ---,
from Memel.
GREENOCK, JUNE 6.—Arrived the Trusty, Wyke, from
Trinidad; and Mary, Pollock, front St. John's, N.B.

The Eliza, Ahott, from Liverpool to Charleston, ran on
,horn near Charleston Bar the 9th ult., and it wag feared
would he totally wrecked.

LAW INTELLIGENCE.-(THIS DAY.)

VICE-CHANCELLOR'S COURT.
IN RE CARDINCTON SCIIOOI.

This was the petition of the Overseers of the parish in
which the Charity is situated, praying that they may be
allowed their costs incurred in a suit instituted by them
fur the due administration of the charity funds.
Mr. SLICDEN, on the part of the Vicar, ridiculed the
idea of parish officers, who were never at a less how to
procure funds for purposes even of a questionable 'charac-
ter, coming to this Court to ask for costs from the funds
of a poor charity.
Mr. BICKERs:TETII contended, that as the overseers had
been successful before the Master, they were clearly entitled
to their costs. At the same time be begged to state, that
the object of the overseers in asking for the order for costa,
was merely to hold it ix terroreni over the Vicar, and
thereby to deter him from insisting upon his own costa.
Mr. SUGDEN said, that if the costs of the overseers
were granted, it would have the effect of shutting up the
charity for years to come. Mix Learned Friend had de-
clared that the overseers were not desirous of enforcing the
order for costs, but that they wished to deter the vicar
from taking his own costs, to which he was unquestionably
entitled. The object then of the overseers was, that the
charity should he relieved from the payment of costs alto-
gether. Now, although the Court could not go all the
way with the overseers, yet it had the power of going
a great way with them, by declaring that at all events they
should not have their own costs.

The VicE-Citaxcimi oa said, that it would he nwxs-
sary for hi,a to look at the original case before he derided
the point.

COURT OF KING'S BENCH.
SWEETING V. liA LSE.

This was an action on a bill of exchange for 157/. The
case was tried at the last sittings for WestminAter, and a
verdict found for the plaintiff. It appeared that the bill
was drawn by the plaintiff, and accepted by the defendant ;
but the day it became due the acceptance was erased, and a
new agreement was written on the back of the bill, to which
the defendant's ❑ame was subscribed. LordTenterden left

it to the Jury that if they believed the plaintiff was It party
to the erasure of the original acceptance, they ought to find
for the defendant.

Sir JAMEs SCARI.ETT now moved for a rule to show
cause why the verdict should not he set aside and a new trial
granted, on the grounds that the finding of the Jury that
the pLtintiff Was a party to the erasure wao against the evi-
dence ; and also that, as the second agreement on the back
of the hill was clearly an invalid agreement, the original
obligation was binding on the defendant.
The CoUKT granted a rule Nisi.
Mr. WYBITRUTI moved for a rule to show cause why
Colonel Bligh, who kas been confined in the King's Bench,
for eight years, should not be discharged, and allowed to
proceed to the Continent and reside there, upon entering
into sufficient securities. Colonel Bligh had assaulted Lord
Darnley and Lord Clifton, and been bound over to keep
the peace, but had afterwards broken his recognioances.
He was now over CO years of age and his health was so
much impaired that there was every reason to believe that
his life would be shortened, unless lie was allowed to reside
iu a milder climate.
Lotd TENTEEDEN inquired whether Col. .Bligk had
stated what security he was willing to give.
Mr. Wvauncn csaid he stated that he was willing to
give any and every reasonable security.
Lord TENTEILDEN—That is not enough. He must go
into particulars, and submit his security to Lord Darnley,
whose life we are bound to see is not endangered by the
discharge of this person. We have heard of recent circum-
stances from our own officer, which makes it necessary that
we should proceed with caution.—Rule refused.