The Sun.
London, England, 1817-06-04 00:00:00

oklutp of l7ltlalisl, whnin the Noble till ettibejlteAs
pa!,tot-elly and politically. Nothing conic! he more
mit'onnded with resp,et to that worthy Prelate,
than the language w4lich it waq said had been at.
Whined to him by a Rev Prektte, in the reported
rpeedi to which he referred. In this it was
averred that the Catholics of Ireland had; on one
been advised by him not to think fatt het
of ou•itioning, but to rely nil their awn •numberS
jthd tirtir owl) strenuth.,. The Noble Earl, in 'Ve-
with!!! suck idipetation, :described the charat-
let osodorl Archhi,shon Tryty to he, of Yii 14
a nit nre, as rendered it morally lot posA ihle hnt•he
coold ottcred sach a•sentiment and, after
adverting to the danger of such assertioits gning
ik.,penied hlt his obliTt was werchy the vi ti •
dication of so excellent ami laudable a cliardeter.
Thr g 4101) of •Ossolefexressetl as siint,ere
revard for the' character of Dr. Tray as the Noble
ratel;. and stated, that the expression imputed trt
him, with resite,t to Dr. Troy, hurl never Callen
hunt hi. lips. His Lordship was proceeding to
state, that the rnint ttf time in the debate alluded
• to by the talohle woe when he (the Bishop
of Ossory) was answering a Hight fey. Prelate,
whom he considered tn, have asserted what was
unthriatian and unconstitutional.
Lord fitteLateb anoke En order, observing, that
though the coortesy cif the Home allowed to
Noble Lords to explaiu any misrepresentations
. that had occurred of what took place, in a former
debate, it was going beyond the line marked out
virtu welt occasions, to animadvert npon what
had hero said by others,- particularly those who
were not now present.
The Lunn CllAKentot ngreed in opinion with
the Noble Lord, and db,ereed, that if they were
to enter into discussions with respect to What had
been said in Newspapers, regarding what had
passed:in that onus,:, he c till nor see•where it
was to end. fie himself had been grossly slandered
in the uewspapers these three days, but
be should he wdoontol of himseit if lie were to take
notice of it within that House.
Lord tint.w:b said, he had no wit't in what he
said to prevent the Eight Reverend Prelate from
eapl,tioing what he thought rtecsssary,Y withre=re
bard to his own speech.
The Bishop of Oi‘Ory was about to rise again,
to' there being a cay of No, no, his Lordship .did
nor persist, and the conversation entled.
ROYAL :tr,ESsactr..—STATE: Or. THE COUNTItY•-•HA.-
ULM COII.PEIS SITSPZIVSION.
Lord SIT)MOLITH delivered in a message from
the Prince ile,kent, which was as figll6Ws
" G. P. R.=—Hisitoyal Highness the Prince Regent, acting
Sit the name und on the behalf of his Majsony, has given or.
ders to lay before the House of Levis papers containiog in-
f.rcaation of the continuance of those practices, meetimr,
and combinations, to which his Royal Highness theught it
.proper to 'call the attention of the House of Lords at the.
cavalaiencentsot of the present Session. of Parliament, and
shoving that theseractices arc still catTicd Olt la different
parts of the enuntey, in a rammer and to an extenstateulatea
to disturb the public, tranquillity, am to endanger the seca•
lit; of the constitudJual rstahlioinews of the empire, His
Highness ncornroends to the Must' of Lords to take
tiais measure into itofaimcdiate and serious consideration,"
The Message having been read by' the Lord
Chancellor, and again by the Reading Clerk at
else Tabre.--*
Lend Visconnr. sirnnotyro observed, that it was
with a. very painful feeling he brought. tiovto a
IMessage pf stich.a nature„ but lie trusted their
linrdships woold do bin) the justice to believe that
it was only, the stlongest sense of duty that could
have prompted the advi3ere of the Prince Regent
to etattncil his ,Itiyal Highness to send down such
a 'Mesaage. It was for their Lordships to deter-.
mine *lost course of proceeding should be adopted
with regard td the
.Message. They lenuld pro-
bably not object to his first mot km for an Address
to the Prince Itegeot, thanking iris Royal fligh-
tless for his comtatutication, and deelartug their
intention of taking the !topers into their imme-
diate and serious consideration be trusted elan
that they would not object to the.motion which
he afterwards intended to make, for referring
these ptpers to a Committee of Secrecy. His
Lordship then moved an Address.
Earl CrteY wished to knew. what precedents
there were for proceeding upon a Message the
same day it c,nne down to' the House ?
Lord Viscount SIOMOUTH said there wore nu-
merous precedents.for an- Address of thanks being
Moved on the same day that a Message was
brought down, which pledged the House to no.
thing specific,
* Bid GREY shirt he did not object.to an Address
et 'Thanks, but he %visited it to be understood that'
he did not thereby pledge himself us to any ulte-
rior proceeding.'
The Asitletss is as agreed to.
Lord Viscount Sib/44,1.7TH then said, that their
Lordships hating pledged themselves by their Ad-
dress to take the iolurtrea,iun communicated with
the Message into their immediate iota serious con-
sideration, be ti listed they Munk' not now object
to refer the papers
,to a Cnrnmittee of Secrecy.
He was 'tot aware met any precedent-in the books
for acting in this way opolt is *Message the Same
day it was brought dowu to the Hottse; too hes:twit°
lea Son hy, upou such act oceasioa, they should not
make a pteeedent. The only object of alloWing
eft Ilitervkli.helWeell the teCeipLUl a Ittiyal Message
and adoptiog any prticceding upon it must have
been, that I he' House should not be taken by stir-
. }tr ixe.
.i t the present instance ample notice had
beet) given,. Isle Noble Friend (Lor'd Liverpool)
, having intimated more than.it week ago, that a
3leasage to this elect .ttoold probably come down
to the House. . saw, therefore, no western why
there sbotiln now be any delay, and he intended
co propose that the papers which had beet) ready
Si) present should.be reterten to a
•Comtnittee of
Secrecy. was propoaed that. the Comm;tiec
.which sat ,t he early, part of the Session sumo
lee revived (without resorting to ballot), with liw
.exception of one Member, the Noble -thlke
(for whom he had the higheet respect) who Won
ill health had been toteble to attend the tomer
Committee, alai who nosy Whdied to decline at.
tending nit the revival., of the COMMitter. His ,
Lordship 'concluded icy diet the. Popers be
refereed to a Comntittett, the tesett of tit; hose

itt &Aid, lie diti flit prttotot te, Anti-

Earl GREY oh,erved, that the Noble Secretary
otState had in fact admitted there were no tilt'-•
cedenta for prtweeltiug ttpnW>i Mess:•ge the same
day,lt was brought frown •to the Houst. - The
,Neible Lord had that they might /flake a pre-
-eedent, and this he (CordOrey) athnit(ed, hut let
it be proved that for to doing there was an indis-
liensibla public necessity, with a view to the pub-
lic safety ; and. tv'here in this rase was tea proof
Undoubtedly ttie Gnus prabandi in this case did
tint tie on Sl;ose who opposed this procecdiug, to
she* that tittle were- Ho precedents ;' but it l-ty
upon Who- toocrd -at proceeding, tU shew
that there nes tt strong and over-ruling - necessity
for it. Aceordiug to all rite informatiOtt he had
liven enabled to 01;.:aia, the state of the country
Was not •such as 't hosc tvilt) advised the bringing
down the Message would (levier it ; on: the con-
trary, he briiervd there was nothing in the state
o; the country that called for the renewal of thnie
strong measures that bad been enacted in the
early part of the Session, and certainly for the
,distress that existed in the country, the renewal of
the Suspension of the-Habeas Corpus was not the
remedy. fie trusted, however; if the Committee
were appointed, 1114 r, as he had before said, they
would anxiously weigh and sift the evidence sub-
mitted to their examination, in order not only to
avoid those et rors into which they had fallen upon
the former occasion, hut that they might not upon
doubtful evtdence make statements that could not
liorne out. He trotted they would took well
to the characters of the persons frotn.4o6tris the•
evidence submitted to them came, and that they
would estiMate with a jolt suspicion those, who
whilst they affected to support the Government,
lost no opportunity of inflaming the pessions of
the people, as it suited their purpose. His Lord-
ihip here read the following hantl bill which was
circulated at Norwich during the recent Election
for Norfolk

" ENGLISHMEN.

s, What ha., canned th• high price of Bread ?

" lins.-Tug Coior BILL !

.6 Who o'ided that unjust and crnel measnre whith grinds
the poor industrions man to the earth, and entails misery on
his starving family and helpless children ? ,

" Ans.--Tire man who tikes the Freeholders of Norfolk by
the nose, and leads them when and where he plums.
" Who is it that has lent all his aid to crush the little
farmer; that noble and virtuous independent Member of So-
tiety, by the incorporation of his little property to swell the
al: eady bulky estate of a slavish tr3nt's ?
" Ans.—The proud and unfteling Despot of Norfolk.
" Who is it that by the enormous and'utensice ink, of ma-
chinery, not. only in agriculture;: lint In. manufactures, has
reduced.thonsands to a state of pauperitM, madness, and de-
spair, which hare lel to the commission Of crimes; of which
humaii nature sliuddvrs ?

_ " Arts.-44 who fu es to himself the rsarite, mid style of Pa-
tribt, 'stud who wiilics still further to liooilwint and enslave
tilt men_ of Norfolk.. • •

4,4 Shall this systein have no ? Are thttfeelings of man.
filed further to bi traurpted on ?No
" 4rise, and do year Duty !" :
What could evince greater Atrodiy than this pro-
duction, what more decidedly proclaim chum: prin.
ciples-of anqrcby which had been denounced by
the Goredroment, and yet this very hand,bilt had
'been circulated in 'support of "the Gip:eminent,
and in favour .of ;he Government, Caodhlate. ,6tul
he understood it was the production of the hest'
of the Brunswick Society, at Norwich, with whom
the. Noble Sect every of State, through his tinder
Secretary, had held a correspondence, in'which he
declared the Brunswick Society to be a highly
Loyal Association. This same Individual too, he
understood was the author of that information
communicated to the Committee in the early part
of the SeSsion, with regard to the alledged &st-
en, a .of Sedition: Societies at Norwich, which
was completely disproved by the Grand Jury
there. It was against being imposed ;you
by the pretended information derived, from
such characters as these,. that he wished to warn
and caution the Committee. If the Committee
'‘ecre to be appointed, be was happy to !tsar Out
the ballot was not. th be resorted to, becatise he
was an enemy to all hypocrisy, and he thought
nothing more hypocritical than to pretend that
there was a free election by, ballot, when it Was
perfectly welt known that, in point of fact, a
Comnaitlee so chosen was appointed by the Ali•
nisters. With regard to proceeding at all now,
nothing had been mged .to prove to him the ne-
cessity for so doing, contrary to all precedent,
stud therefore he should mote to postpone the con-
sideration of the Message sill Thursday. He
thought, however that no proceeding might to
be had till the trials for High Treason had taken
place, from whence evidence might be collected
more to he relied :Trill than the information laid
before the Committee.

The'Earl of Lzvauront denied that ii bad been:
admitted by his Noble Friend that there wt re no
precedents, his Noble Friend hoviog Merely:stated
that he was not aware of them ;.—and upon this
•point laa•must contend; that there wo so.) groonit
for the plea. of delay, there being no pretence For
saying that the House was taken by sur'prise,
had given Hot* Of the Mesaage last fridaysen.
night, that it was not brought down list' h't !trey
arose from an event that was not foreseen on the
Friday preceding, in consequence of which it was
posfponed till this da'y. bll3, in poitit, of fact,
there was a longer notice given than had ever be-
fore been the case with regard to a Alessage; and
added to this, it should be recollected that ityva3
distinctly contemplated at the time the Habeas'
Corpus Suspension Bill passed through 'Patna.,
molt In the course of the present Session. Un-
doubted!). it wits only it strong sense of duty,
connected with the most' important considei
s.
Lions of the public safety, that coold bare indoeed
Miniiters to advise the present MeSSage. With,
regard to the bend-bill read by theN'Oble gni, be-
as much as any than ,detested attempts made to
flame the base Tossions of the people, Ott w
ever side they were attempted, whether in sup.
„port al Government itt` itt it)4o#lottoo and
lie trotted the case elluded to ti;-, the Noble Earl
would he a lesson to others on whatever side of
opiniott,'not .to.resort to such means of
inflaming the public mind.— As to thf!
Cututnitteei it bad beery i perh*ps, more faltiti
4

(CnfnpVlSillg tfollte Lori; blinding chit 4
relftly upon subjects generally) titan any
.ether Commit tee ever before formed in Parliament ,
anti the Members of it were unanimous iu the,:
ltvirort ; which Repot had, ii all its m terial
points, been accurately confirmed. Ile therefore
saw oo reason whatever for impeaching, in the
fliglifeat degree, that I nor conic! he tlis
cover any solid reason why the House should now
refrain, after so !Ong a notice, from acting *spoil
the Message brought dUwii this day, and refer-
ring the papers communicated with it to a similas
Committee.

Earl GaosVEgOR anitnadvetted upon the express
tlisacquaintauce of the
,Noble Mover with anypre-
cedent whatever for the course which his motion
called upon the House to athyt, and contended,
that as that Course was contrary to established
practice, while it was wholly uncalled for by ally
valid plea of necessity, it ought not to he acceed-
ed to. The danger, indeed, ofagi•ecing to a de-
parture from precedent. in this case was the more
dangerous, because such a•departnre would serve
to create a precedent for the future, and of this
precedent the worst use might be made : for
should a Minister heteafter arise, entertaining a
desire to carry arbitrary power to the extreme, he
might avail himself of this precedent to take the
House by surprise, and without any warning, On
sudden press for the adoption of a measure sub-
versive of the liberties of the country.- But while
he thought the Noble Mover boOod to sbew that
there was some'precederst for the proceeding which
he- now proposed; he would not- be toulerstodsd so
pertinaciously to ,adhere to precedent, as to resist
any deviation that justice or. necessity might ap-
pear to demand. to this case, however, be could
not imagine any degree of justification of deport-
ing front the established practice of the House
with respect to a Message from the Crown.
Earl SPRNCRK sititi that the extraordinary no-
tification of the Noble'Earl butt certainly guarded
against surprise. But be objected to the 'Avec-
dem. Would the notice of.the Noble Earl appear
upon the Journals ? This. was the great ()angel—
(Hear, hear !)-,-1-le 'had taken no share • in the
proceedings on the kite Report, and he bowed to
the authority of some Members of the Committee,
whom he most sincerely respected, without being
himself Convinced that it was necessary to adopt
the measure then proposed.. Subsequent eircom-
staeces had even increased his doubts. He there-
fore joined in the hope of his Noble Friend {Earl
Grey) that the Committee would weigh well the
evidence before it ;- it being intended to propose
a renewal of the existing Bill fo: an indefinite
time, and during the recess of Parliament, and
trusted the Haase would net with de:liberation and
circtonspeettion,'-and not go beyond the absolote
necessity of the Case.

The-Marquis of BUCKINGITAM said, the ques-
tion was, whether the Committee-way tote ap-
pointed now or at A flittire (1511% Stith 'MIS the
proper footing upon which it stood, It wet pro-
perly remarked, that each of these points should
be allowed to remain iipou its grounds, tri:hout
any reference toTreeetlent. What was now their
situation.? Were:they to jo,!ile wtu there
Was 0 necessity-for the communication from ?Le.
Crown ? The reason offered against appoint.:,g
the Committee on the state day the Address WAS
presented was, that the House may have t;,oeto
judge whether a prima/ode case of neeetiity was
enable out. , That case had, iM his opinion, been
made out by their ftrrnier .proceedings. When a
Message was brought from the Crown, stating,
the' existence of serious dangers, they shonld ant
be so curious, with respect toLprecedent as to pre-
vent an investigation from being gone into im-
mediately, It- was the duty of the House nut to
lose a turnitent. 11 no necessity existed fur mea-
sures of precaution, those measures ought not to
remain in force at' all but Isbell it was stated
that such, necessity existed, no. tittle should be
lost in ciamining into
LOrdIIULLAND trusted his Noble Friend would
not be offended' if he regretted the impatience ma-
nifested by hint for a measure went to Cts-
pew! the Constitution. He admitted there was Ito
surprise—the whole machinery laid Itliciently
open—but still he (Lord' Holland) docked- much
of the irregular l'indariek mode of treating mere
dry precedents, which scented to, be the favourite
and professed style Of the Noble Secretary. An
allosion Was made to his amendment to substitute
June for July in the MI. But his object then
was not early consideration, but to make the dura-
tion of arbitrary power one Month less,—(Hear,
hear l).—He was surprised the Noble Earl and the
Noble Secretary were so silent 14)911 the persnows
who were 'supposed to have or ted the Norwich
haml47ill. The reason
.was ohrions. it was not
said the Noble Lords opposite knew any thing of
.the hand bill, but that those who were supposed
the ant hors of it had sent information to the Home
Department'.

•
The Marquis of BycluscmAst, eaplnnatlim,
said, Itls tittpaticitee ivas Owing, not to his wish
to continue the Act, but to tnquire whether
was or was not necessary, !mil 'if the tatter
repeal it.--The Motion was then 'agreed to.
- 'Lord Stnstoortt theta proposeth he-names of "tile
Committee es before, with the vxeeptimt of the
I)ttite of Bedford, for whose :inure he proposed
that of airl 'Falhot .
Earl GttgY, after a few words,' proposed the
Earl of Rosslyn.
The intme of Earl Talbot
..ivas 11: en rallst:lnted
for that ot at Bedford.
The Bill TAN'titlroot. said, 'that ttt the com-
mencement of the Session, a c(►mintiniclllo,lw3s
made to Parliament relative to the state cut tile
country, and if it was in the judgment of t1,1.e Ex-
ecutive GOVt!rlitlierit tri make A loft her'terort
the course of the ',Seision, the most adviseable
mode. of proceeding Was to ',revive the for.oer
Committee-, sal theinostlikely to execute Ole
ties eotrusted it) it t)". the House. :A No .-le Lor.:
WO now prciposeti to be a 'member of the Cciti •
inittee, and he saw no person more comi,elcilt
fear
tbat situation.
Earl 614:Y moted, name that •the.nae of the Lord-
Chancellor be left resit of the CoMmittee, oti ).Ic-
count of hit many other avotiationi, and that tlie,
name of the Lail of Rosslen be substituted in hi,•
stead, •

l'his motion was put from the 'Woolsack. erd
negativeft. Tite House then approv'tti
Cointl)ittec, whicird,:wrsists qf the lime Nitit;ber

sts *vete appo:bieri at lite corittiOneement
Session, with the extcptiott of -1;A:11111bf.)t, a
fills the place of the Doke of nedforti.
sT.ar, ritIsONERS IN IWAIN.SIIIRE.
Lord Llot,ea,D brought fortcarathe inotioti,
witiehhe had given notice relative to the COuila
of the SteretaTV of State, in interfering tviill'l'
ditties est the ..logiitrates, of ilerOire, sou II
jeta from visiting the Stale priSifiltrii''
prevent th
Reading jail. It was, he s,,iti, a waiter ef ill'"'
3erions conseqttence for a Allinistrt
.of the tol
to fuse upon himself to interpret the 1004
the Country, am; violate the procisiont It
positive et of Parliament. lit the yea k.c
' Itft Act had been passed, which declarei a,,,
Magistrates bad a right to visit ptionecil'
all jails ; h•st iiere the litllgistrates il (.1t;
lion were infortuzd that theY most nett l'i'illor
State prisoners. file observed, that hp Itic
,0
Bill' for an,pentlingtbe atheas Collets Act) !04
Secretary of State bail tile putter= I
ilaPriio,
any person, on information heiog glycol° kid
and keeping such person in prior); but Le tic
no tight to be the exponittler of the la"' bo
should ',thew that the Secretary of Et 3441
gorse beyond the line of Ilia duty whets 441
Answers to the questions put by the MAKili' ill
Berkshire. [Here the Noble Lordreaileverio
' different questions put by the Magistrates,sL,
answer of the Secretory of S tate, $u:1) 0 isig!;t4,
already before the public.] Several of the at'li,
were extremely harsh, particularly that triticl)s4
bite(' It sta‘c .Prisoner from reatlit,tg a ''''..s7,Potifil
and several ot ler, regillet ions laitidosr,a "'"v hob
to the treatment of State P.iioners ‘"..r,eimia
and unlawful.. At the lime of .tite.llervi'bops
h. 'giant, the first right &planer(' 01',44..0
iltaio":l6a tsel:!byltitlit'e°tNboehltei istPtetir7le, dbywtietbitiiii)a::::,:t,:isig::4llel:lltlrft::
they were not to do that %shies illy Pe,f,::;,o
'or the Country enjOitted them to eo. _.,;;',„
a poht Which it was ti....: dbuty of
quire into; lie thereforemoved that 04,eorxig
before the flottse * corl nf the roill'i r fele
which took place between the Justices 0
shire and the Secretary of State. 1 it.ble'
Lord St Inr.arcin-rta aisuttel the. {lota e 1 !'',l,i,g"
charged. against him had beersdoo 3` Aftil
sgurae.cegtlyirtieetiluitriirlimtilkogef,r 11111:tee
.lit4l,l.trli ne7itccttindqrspsl'orfe'f lit:o: t:rel::::bll:ec:
:iji,'cllir:
.spousibility .from himself. As I°
,f` ihect4
(19" e, Ite! always troderstood the i1t.e.,7. StO
prisoners were 41w:lts cOntrairedto.„ 0:e I'l
anti if they bad been etwri;!ied tv,11,040,:!r;
C9uncii, the St!cretary it
or State 10' 1, l''' lr"
hall been the practice in the titter° if, reti':
and others, who refused Stgle rt,l/",n;,, Fcril
thelo,tift ci.:iiirititc:olco;-I,4;tt: tiiebrt
flout
it,:,l,opl,4.'"ri'efil:,,,,t,i4ti.;lnicilt;trib,}e::s4:if.
laltstal:e..)l7ll.ll;rl(,,Cioltiti,!:ll.,6elli)ll,l},e;errel: 11c,:r.1.14,iti1:1::111:13.,.'5'
Sign Itt'sEt their relatives, or all (I.tae'ivt.,%,,i
rHe therefore contended that the P*o folly "-ail
ranted him in. the s:cps lotelY.l".l“,'''fricao"l:".
cessary tigonr, he eisintainell, !,•"10...b, 1011',!
state
# ;..olle it: ~e
a",i B,rrri:y. Tlie- power ..5504.01 .0(1," $.
(,:tt7'lat'''rtl'ar!rY'eltiii-l'
1:°:11'N":if('11:lifiStgl)(k4b)I.1E1 tie:lbact‘Ye. 'rell,::':::.11:17s;(:li cl
ic
I°ls7e'ir'ltt.:ll:cilerti:Y,ll d.ritii:'l'l:l'jtie'i`c;e:ttt'rilla:4;slb4r:o:llllili'll'te:: ;.;:te.ltifi:''
*the king's gaols, :anti that the nid6ritoti
clEe• his prerogative over ad St3in:trioesl'll'l,..
fitted in those gaols. This
set=!wool' „riiloil " ~,,-.
-As tit the a d‘iCe 13 rty 0° ;I.os
law talkers of the CriliVri, be tvott it so, in ;t.
lion to any such op of vri'ecni,,,,l;AK't'it:
opposition to a p.,)sitive Act ("t` tbilitfOlii,i'
could not see, that to rctioirif ~12,3:- id l'Ille't! tai:
won'tl argot n want_ of tont...--c°i4 sattt.-
ters of the Cloven ; our affili4 1,;40,
ftsbcottnyiirrit:ntlitiel(h;:teiteitit'-iejtorql:io'seret:l':}l:.;:estit:e:tt:::::‘°'l::j:l:l;ccr3!)freub;.4llll.°oeil..
be set up against tile I,:w of the :,;I.he 0090.
'ilf-h4ttl.l,ee constitution a'oulti Heo.,va ' , .
The Earl of LIVE3Vbin. OPPsl:\figiOe'lit..'
prerogative Ot ill, n'a, .0.
tending to_ throW at Cc tiSttre 011011.14.,, 1)0 5...1:.
Act which" Arus not only instill." '0 preit'"..
legal. There wilt Ito law Which
,5
the
crovtli..
' Intl exercise.of the prerogative Qi ,rolvoiol;i,'
it Was an essential port of that .1)fi'li(;„ of at' I.
the entift: Illtitligeoicot sell reetott,
~Itie to(,::,
Prisoners. LAI' La HOSSLYN SilliP"r,'l.o V, di .
~ell.R it:lll,e
. MC LOUD CfnANCBl.l..f,ft • W's, rit, E,'•_.,ti
• st"el. that in IV;ltit be Was .' 1',,,' iog 10' , '
should not be considered as pl,'"c
Sibis'loany opinion hereafte.rii tti::.B-'01:7 1.,1.1:ir,t it.
sent tli3(.ll3Siati, a legal I) t'°.o , as 3 „.0
of the very act whirl' 8 caw.; ri:Dor.
Place, and that their Liort!stor, ii,Li,o..
hair 14) it
Jsiti.scsitlicace,astiesi.g3iiittintsylii).),titi,arttiecl:s'
.:31,,te 0. t.100,1,?0[,,,i.
~ti
Lord (11,,Iland) hati,founti the;s:ll 14,, of :,
wil4 dial t:.ey nor ;eel: 8 tcoloi}:v ,li,c,it'.r,l
I`;,,iiie Lord wishi:fi, :o correct A.);01:7 ir, g
51,1",,,,
I e, 4'. ny dist_ tic floc ;mce ti- 1.):..r,i , Itaa'o:.
ili.st ritpoSe; but 1.0 'siting' for 7: ceoore . ,
the peesent. impiki !Ile, a
,V 2 't" '
n.,,,,!1 ti,, 'Oll
EXeCtltiYe GOieT:inr4tt , ".4 1 .I, 1,0'011,0.
tt'nt thc nrer,g7v.iv(.s of the COI;
~0-',
v"i'l. No Act of Parliament. cool 1
,`..'i4olif i,,..
the ACE 'Vt6 "1,, OFI
;7rert,g.t; i N c;5, tilt'', b 5, .-- . , .111,1 oat prc
that tt certain pcerPOlive.s°:eriaioly de(. 0
ei.",l he Act of 1701 I,i-,ll,,istrjte- , hat' 'iv
e„.eneral terms. tht,t - tie, i' t.i._2l. if
it o'o4 , 0 ri';
it/ visit prioncrs in gaol!. i
_l!.`
lt 11,,y pers',,,,,•
Towttive 01 the crro.vit tO pi r...,-: . _ 1,,„L,c)„
iloi.tr, .. Ai
having access to a ..7'"= l' silo io eiC!;ol.f.
itCotall not be art...c0:41 bY, ~torqr,ol ,
Fire, he co:Ile:I.:0i tl"" thc t.:c.l4l;pti, ;Pr llP7''.
i htd done, ,
jitstiied itt wh,tt de . , ..0. , 0
0, 1110 Iliollo . the iti 1
SOH. he shottlit 1,.,,i',- . - ... vow, Of owl'
Eril SPEriCF,:t SllB.ke hil '4lbe fjoitsC
,_ ,§.
A! test Si.tne time lie !Ought lotion 4 9
oe,d,
Ire 411°V" •
(ti
,' it
le i : r
it
Li
,Ir
,11Cel:::
ii Id
ort t►i
tri.l i
le i t
ini :LI 1 1;i: 'I
t' .
14:1
sli: 1
v) ;1;
til
rg:
its :1! :- :4:
rep:tr c sfyt:
Is)
13, : : ::: ialt, ;Ili
1,1
.11 :
ile:.s 1 ,i o; ii I:
oil
01:1 e
0.0 I:: 0;
!I :
frliOft Ot ,
~,,_OOO,
several argumenra.m ';',000,,g tile I u,w, pat
Tile (1 cI r t;tris for ac;s• 1 %lotion ival. 700,09
neß.t!ired : ,_the mig": t ,re„o.Clocs„_ ,4jotri
negatived. Adjenirtivi'l _,,,trirerrie
Lrer The Ilchte ti thelieveava-er•

of

1

i