The Sun.
London, England, 1828-01-03 00:00:00

Witness asked him where his father lived, and he
replied at a baker's shop in Cursitor-street : went
there and saw the father, and asked him if he had
been out that day. He said he had—that he had
gone out at three o'clock in the morning to Long-
ford, and from thence to Brentford. Witness asked
him what his business was there; and he said, to
purchase some feathers, as he was in the feather
line. He said he also went to Stratford, in Essex,
and got home by six o'clock in the evening.—
Nl:itness asked him why he got up so early, and he
said he had mistaken the time. He then said, " fur
God's sake what is the matter." Witness told him
that his mother was no more; he seemed greatly
agitated at the moment, and witness said his story
was rather a round-about one, and he must accom-
pany him (witness) and see Mr. Lett. Took him
to No. 11, Montague-Place, and there saw Mr.
Halls and Mr. Lett. Was ordered to take care of
him until the Jury had sat on the body. He said he
had come back from Longford in a return chaise.
He did say whom he went to see at Stratford, but
witness does not recollect the name. He also said
he had been out the night before, but he did not say
where, for witness asked him no questions as to the
Monday, conceiving that the murder was perpetrated
on the Tuesday.

By the Jury—He did not ask as to the particulars
of his mother's death, nor did he express any wish
to see the body. Searched his person, and his
lodgings also, but found nothing. The grandson is
a clerk to a law stationer. The son is a lodger, and
has a family. He was sorting some feathers when
witness saw him. Witness stripped him naked, but
could find no marks of blood, nor any thing which
could throw any light upon the subject.
Sir Robert Baker here addressed the Coroner,
and said, that sufficient evidence had been adduced
to show that the woman had been murdered, and
unless evidence could be adduced in proof of the
murderer, perhaps it would be the more judicious
plan to let the investigation terminate here. It
would be resumed much more efficacously elsewhere.
The CORONER and Jury seemed fully to coincide
in this opinion, and in a few minutes Sir Robert
Baker, as the Foreman of the Jury, returned a ver-
dict of " Wilful murder against sonic person or per-
sons unknown,"

POLICE INTELLIGENCE.-(THIS DAY.)

GUILDHALL.

Jane George was brought up in custody of an officer.
It appeared from the statement of the husband, that they
had married about 16 months ; that he was a clerk to a
solicitor, and that having disagreed with his wife, in conse-
quence of her habit of novel reading, and associating with
females of a loose characters they separated ; that last night
she called at the office of Mr. Thomas, in Basinghall-
street, where she saw the complainant, and on his telling
her to begone, she used the most offensive language, and
hence the complaint. She stated that she had heed induced to
marry the complainant, much against her parents' inclina-
tion ; but her father afterwards fitted up a house for them,
and gave her 60/., which he had spent, as well as sold
all the furniture.

The MAGISTRATE declined interfering. He advised the
female to apply to the overseers of her parish ; and, if they
refused to relieve her, then to apply to a Magistrate for a
warrant.