The Sun.
London, England, 1828-11-12 00:00:00

13IPO

TED.

EX ron.

.FED.

riarike pc-1
hi
This riod last
y 04a. year.

Bags, arc. Bags, &c.
Liverpool 552,336 693,P4
London 62,513 65,57 S
Glasgow 40,397 56,386
Total exported in 1928
Same period 1927

CATTLE.

Previous.
ly this
y ear.

Bags, &c. Bags, &e.
18,714
900 45,1', 4
1,64:

66,603.
69,744.

An Account of Cattle imported into Liverpool from the
3d to the Bth iust., both days included.
Cows Calves Sheep Pigs Horses Mule
1,139 107 1,711 2,215 1
.0

Los T,---We hear that the portmanteau of
Counsellor D 1 NE (President of the Cork Brunswick
Club, who left this City on Sunday to dine with the Jaw-
trupolit in Club), in which was deposited a silver box, con-
taining the Freedom of the City, intended fur Lord LoNG-
VOItn, Was abstracted on the road, and has not been found.
It is hoped if Malls into the hands of any Liberal, or Li.-
4111 Club; it will in retur W. aiscork Soahero ageporkr.

. Much surprise is expressed at no apparent pro-
gress having been made in this undertaking; and
that while the rival institution, which the very men-
tion of this was to have crushed, has started into full
operation, this portion of the March of Intellect
should proceed at so very slow a paee„.if in fact, it
can be said to have proceeded at all. As one ex-
cuse-for this delay, we can easily imagine that the.
Managers May tie desirous of knowing the full ex-
tent of the pecuniary means which they are likely
to have at their command before they determine
upon the extent of their operations. This, how-
eVer, they will find impossible. They have long
since passed the Rubicon of 100,0001:, which they
themselves fixed as the sum with which their opera-
tions should commence ; and it seems strange to-
wards thiiie who so promptly supplied the funds to
this extent that the Committee should be so slow
in applying them. • In the hands of energetic peo-
ple the site would have been long since chosen, and
the foundations by this time laid, and the whole
building in advance; at least sucla was the case with
the London University,and might therefore be with
this, in which the " King's name is a tower of
strength ;" though we do not hear, by the bye,
that his Majesty is so enamoured of the new under-
taking as to have given it 1,0001., of which its pro-
jectors boasted so loudly by anticipation. In this
respect, as in most others, it is impossible not to
applaud his Majesty's good taste ; for, however
laudable the proposed institution may be in its ob
ject, it is avowedly a point of rivalry to which that
high Personage shows great discretion in not becom-
ing a party. Besides which, Joint-Stock Societies,
of which this is avowedly one, are not fit partner-
ships for Kings. Adverting again to the delay, we
believe it is still mainly owing to the difficulty the
ComMittee continue to labour under in procuring
and fixing upon a site. The old adbge of " Many
men, many minds," is, we hear, strongly instanced
among the body in question, who are stated as having
among them advocates for all the points of the com-
pass. If, however, they would all agree to abandon
these points, and come to the centre, we apprehend
they would best fulfil the wishes of the subscribers,
and meet, what must be the object of all, public
utility.—Morning Herald.

LAW INTELLIGENCE.

COURT OF CHANCERY, Nov. I 1.

MURRAY V. HEAlli.

The follosving is a short statement of the course
of proceeding which has taken place upon the ques-
tion in jostle :

'Mr.. Murray, the celebrated bookseller in Albe-
marle-street, had employed Mr. Heath to make a
series of engravings to illustrate an addition of the
poetical. works 'of the Rev. Mr. Crabbe. Mr. Heath
having Mifortunately become a bankrupt, his estate
was, in the usual 'manner, vested in assignees,
and amongst the effects which came into the hands
of the assignees :were several numbers of the engrav-"
ings which Mr. •_Heath had been employed by Mr.
Murray to make. To these numbers, or copies, Mr.
Murray alleged tit he was entitled, but the assig-
nees. of Mr. Hi* refused to give them up. In
these eircurnstruise, Mr. Murray tiled a bin in Chan-
cery for an injunction to restrain the assignees from
selling or disposing of the engravings until the ques-
tion'Of property should be tried' by a court of ‘azina-
mon law. The injunction was granted, and awissue
directed, which was tried before Mr. Justice Gaselee
at. Guildhall. In the Court of Chancery the-defence
of the assignees was, that in the •trade and art of en-
graving there existed a usage among the engravers to
retain for their own use and benefit a (Train number of
copies (not exceeding the number here in dispute) of
all engravings which they have been employed to make.
At the trial in the Common Pleas the jury, after some
conversation with the presiding Judge, found in the
words of the. issue, " That in the business of en-
graving there existed a usage and practice authorising
engravers to retain a certain number of copies (eight
or ten) for their own use." There was no appeal,
either by motion for a new trial or otherwise, from
the decision which the jury made abort the matter
of fact. After some time the assignees came to the
Court of Chancery, and moved the Vice-Chancellor
that the injunction be disselved. The motion was
refused, and the Vice-Chancellor intimated that there
should be an action to try the right of the parties, as
his Honour was of opinion that the issue tried was
so framed as that any finding upon it could not at all
settle the question of right, which was the real ques-
tion in the case.

In this state of affairs, MrAIORNE now moved to
discharge the last order of the 'Vice-Chancellor. .
The ATTORNEY-GENERAL replied.

After the case bad been an hour and a half before
the Court, the LORD CHANCELLOR discovered that
the proceeding professed to be an appeal from an
order of the Vice-Chancellor, there not being, in fact,
such an order in existence.

A great deal of discussion followed, and much
fluctuation And contradiction among the members of
the bar. It was at last decided that there should be
a new trial by action, and that the costs of the pro-
ceeding should abide the ultimate result of the pro-
ceedings.

ROLLS' COURT, Nov. 11.
The Master of the Rolls went this evening
through his remaining petitions, after which his
Honour went into the cause-paper.

IN THE CASE OF SHEFFAILD t. CLIFFORD
Mr. KELLY moved the Court that the Learned
Judge who had tried an issue, under the name of
" Reddy v. Sheppard," at the late Assizes at Nor-
folk, might be requested to furnish the,Court with
his notes of the trial, with a view to founding upon
them a motion for a new trial of the issue. In sup:-
port of his motion the Learned Gentleman stated a
great number of facts, and was proceeding to state
others connected with the case when

The MAsnitt of the Rous said, that the better
plan would be to defer any further observation until
the notes of the Lord Chief Baron tould be procured,
which his Honour accordingly directed Mr. Kelly to
procure.

directingl Intß ER ToOleN
_ !MEYER 2./. MAUDsLRY.
Masterapplie dto Courttrovbetmhetlie
referred, to admit, on the part of a French gentleman;
named Martin, evidence of a debt of 4,000/., which
order,lcau s
efosrt 0
oa
dn '.
had been tendered to the Master, and refused by.
him.
Mr. TINNET and Mr. KiiIGILT were beard on the
other side ; but in Mr. Pemberton's reply it appeared
that the Master had not yet made any report, and
The MASTER of the nous was of opinion that
Mr. Pemberton's motion was premature and irregular,
whatever might be the ultimate decision in the cause.
Mr. PEMBERTON, in his justification, alleged that
there were creditors to the amount of 300,0001. in
• the same circumstances as his client, and he hoped
that the magnitude of the interests at stake, and the
want of an adequate remedy for the injury which
should be done, would excuse any slight deviation
from the regularity of practice.
The MASTER of the ROLLS thought, however,
that the time for bringing the subject before him
would be after the Master had made his report.

COURT OF KING'S BENCH, Nov. 11.
GLASSPOOI. V. YOUNG.
SirJ. SeARLETT stated that this was an actin of
trover itauitat the defendant, wh9 ad been burg!'