The Sun.
London, England, 1810-11-30 00:00:00

freedom of discussion. With regard
to.the V.estion -now before their Lo.dsiiips, he Was
decidedly 'of' opidion that the adjournment ought
nbt 'lb AVe'pltice, and enlarged upon the inconve-
niehd.qs and dtingefs that might ensue from it.
Ttletarl'ot WesTmortELAND supported the mo-
tion.

‘
tOrd DA rtNia'f was strongly against a further ad-
journment of fourteen days.

We tegret'veey.tritic.ll that we are unable, from want of
worn, to give-the details of the'rernainder of the debate.]
'Lord Gitvls:VlCl2E said, he could not withhold his
e.:xl;ression of Surprise at the hardihood of Ministers
'in bringing fierward loch a motion in such a fear-
ful crisis of weirs, ant liar wit bout .s.upporting the
measure on the grOond of any argument. Nothing
in't he shape of argument did they adduce in justrtica-
tion of stich condUtt. lie was therefore not a little at
it IOSS. tin:Conceive how they could have brought
the rOvin minds to the proposition of such a pro-
cteding;--;how-they could h .ve s.'en'tured to propose a
measure, at once 'so degrading to their Lordships'
lionsei'sb itfitions to the hest interests of the country;
So SubverSive of every •principte of the Constitution
never
.was a wish more Sincerely formed than that he
felt and expressed, that ott the present occassion the
most Del•fect, Unanimity might prevail. Many
indixed tilt); indeed the nature alone of
the subject, atixliAbly to look fOr 'that desired otta.
ninth), ; but he was too .sartguine in 'his etpec.-
tations al it: in order to secure that unanimity,
he had Made many sacrifices of what a just and
Fair line of c, nduet might have demanded, and he
consequently ccisunted to a further adjourn-
ment 'Of 1 4 days,. though 'no satitractary re:ison
had bAin furnished for it. But now Ministers called
ucon hini, and tho`si who thought with him, to
the consistency of their conduct, and ask
us, why we will nut agree to a further adjournment
ol.tourieen days, merely because we asent“.l to it
beiore 5 and tt•ough 'lit), are riot able to bring for-
W:irci a single argument to induce to acquiesce in
the meilsure Mel. propose. _

• •
'File Loi CitANCti,LOR 'replied at considerable
►u with uttual ability, to Lord Gren-
ville.

Lird Erskine, Lord Stanhope, and the Marquis of
Lansdowne, each supported the Amendment.
Tt.e Duke. of SUSSEX expressed his concern that
.lie should detain the House fur a moment, but he
was anxious to state the motives which induced him
tO,give the vote w!tich he should on, the present oc-
casion: His H. had voted for the. last adjournment
conceiving, that, it the King's: Sign Manual could
be obtained this day., there could be, no objection
to' r'he adjournment. On the present occasion,
however, .he must vote for the , amendment of
the Noble Lord, on this principle, that it should be
knoWn into %.vlicAe hands the c tre of his Majesty's
health Ntts committed, and that when he was res-
tored, which he hoped to God would. be speedily,
;hat the power abould be returned into his Majesty's
hands, pure and un.ullied.
Their Lordships then divided on the motion'
• For the Atijriurnment
- for the Amendment • . . . 56
Majority tur Ministers . . —32
Adjourned Thitrsday, the t 2th of December.