The Sun.
London, England, 1845-05-10 00:00:00

SILVER-PLATED DISH COVERS,

B. SAVORY and SONS, Manufacturing
• Silversmiths, 14, Cornhill, London, opposite the Bank of
England, Fminnit for choice in their Plate-rooms, many Patterns of
siLvEn.rLATEn DI9II COVERS, of Sheffield Manufacture, from
Fifteen to Twenty Guineas the set, viz.

Double Dome Pattern
Size. £ s s. d.
Plated Dish Ccver, 20 in. 5 13 6 I Plated Dish Cover, 20 in. 5 17 0
Dish Cover, 18 in. 4 7 6 1 Dish Cover, 16 in. 4 14 0
Dish Covers, 16 in. 5 12 61 Dish Covers, 14 in. 6 6 6

The Melon Pattern,

Per 5et........ £l5 13 61 Per set ••• • • • £l6 17 6
The above have silver handles and mountings, and silver shields
or engraving the crest or coat of arms.

A Price Current, illustrated by Drawings, and containing every
Information relative to the purchase of Silver or Sheffield Plate, may
be had on application, or will be be sent into the country, free of
postage, in.answer to a paid letter.

POND'S PERMANENT MARKING INK,
requiring no preparf.tion, for 'Writing Initials, Names, or
Ciphers upon Lim+, Ike., for the purpose of identity, and security
against loss or mistake. This original production is allowed to he
the only article similarly used, the mark of which does not run la
the was:), and which has given general satisfaction for its fixity and
neatness of impression . .
Prepared Ipy the inventor, Joint Bond, Chemist, 28. Long-lane,
West Smithfield, and sold by most Stationers. &e., price Is. a bottle.

LA W INTELLIGENCE.
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, May 9.

:Middlesex Sittings at Nisi Prius, before Mr. Justice Ent and
Common Juries.)
B ROOM E V. GOBDEN.
This was an action of libel.

The plaintiff is the landlord of a public.house called the Rising
Sun, in Ayr-street, and the defendant is the printer of the Era
newspaper- The alleged libel represented that the plaintiff had
given information of a fight which was to come off on the 13th of
August last, between two persons named Smith and Sizmons, wear
Melton, and that his object in giving the Information was for gain,
as he had a large interest in one of the parties. It was also stated
in the same newspaper that a man had been hocussed and robbed
in the plantiff's public.house, and that the plaintiff's disgraceful
affair with George Norley, and other shameful acts, were not for.
gotten. Special damage was alleged, and two witnesses were
called to prove that in consequence of the statements in the Era
they have abstained from staying at the plaintiff's house on the
occasion of their coming to London.

On the part of the defendant, it was contended that he was not
liable for the statement which had appeared in the newspaper, in-
asmuch as it was contained in a letter bearing the signature of
" A Lover of Honest Sporting," and was accompanied by some
observations of the editor doubting the truth of the represer.ta.
tions, and stating that the newspaper was open for the insertion of
any observations in explanation that the plaintiff liked to make.
It was also contended that the statement relative to the hocussing
cast no imputation upon the landlord of the public-house.
The jury found a verdict for the plaintiff, with damages Is., on
the issue which was undefended, and for the defendant on the other
issues.
The Learned Judge refused to certify.