The Sun.
London, England, 1844-07-23 00:00:00

, •
to
- . •
j-• not see how it was nenessary to be, a divine, in ordeirbi
judge—whether the- Church would be endangereuoi
allowing a Catholic gentleman to send his son abr
for his education.
,• The Bishop of LONDON wi;hdrew his amens Jere!
and the Bill went through Committee, and was ord
to be printed..
The Soap Allowances Bill was read a. second time.
REGISTRATION OF CHNPELS BILL' ibis
Lord TEYNHAM moved the second reading
of the
Bill, the object of which was to rep: al so much d
-present- Acts . relating_ to this subject +A Well Prevent de.
religious service before registration.. It was further 0
o
signed to allow a ministerf the Gospel to prealni°,4o
unreg;stertd chapel to a congregation not exceelD''
in number. . ped
. The LORD CHANCELLOR said that the law allo or
rs
every family to pray together, and aliowr4l vi6'.° be
~atol
persons. accidentally present, besides the family, pble
number of twent, to join .in the prayer. The hold
Lord did nut object to the registration, and whY %calif
not the registration take place before the buildiag,e-cid
be named as a chapel ?. He saw no reason for tot
the law, and opposed the Bill.
g Dill'
The•Bish,p ot GLOUCESTER also oppo- ' three
and moved that it be read a second time that day
months.

Lord TEYNH relied. • ;
The motion forA thM e sec pond reading was negat-Y
out a division, and the Bill was lost. the
• Lord TEYNHAM presented a petition from - of the
rish of Marylebonc, complaining of the operations_ °,,,0r,
Anatomy Act, as offensive to the feelings of tbe
The petitioners prayed to be allowed to prove their
legations at the bar.
Their Lorikhilis.adjnitrned at Eleven o'clock.

HOUSE OF COMMONS, July 22'
- FRANCE AND MOROCCO. in
On the order of the.'day for the House rig
Committee of Supply being read, a 1444
Mr. SHEIL said he had already informed the
lion. Baronet at the head of her Majesty's G°Yebrali be
that he should not persevere in the motion of "if-sit)
had given notice, hut that he should content hirestc,bha
moving for certain papers, the particulars of i"',.siclt
should specify in the course of the observations
,s
the intended to make, He was anxious to confine tbt
self in the discussion of a mere matter of form
no 00
facts, and, to abstain from any superfluous cenvneheer
them. 'Any:Oentleman who was of opinion that refire
tertained the design, which would be worse than a 00,
hensible, of -exciting a feeling of animosity between
great nations did him wrong, and he should 100 v 0
he did wrong by the tone which he should oriel,'
He felt that it was the deep interest of both Vuaerl'
to remain at peace, and that by their collision w.et,,a ao
would be disturbed. At the same time he cone° thettr
advantage could be derived from concealing fra,Tir eyes
selves the precise truth, or from their averting tae ibe9r,
from objects which must of necessity at last force
selves upon' their contemplation. On the sts
bat
July,' 1830, he risked abruptness, in orde
rfisitf
he -might avoid the ' greater fault of Sr%
On the sth of July, 1830, Lord Aber Idol
dressed a dispatch to. Lord Stuart de , /3,oectiil
which was conceived in a must prudential an";,bstrf
tory spirit. He would take the opportunity °',4-Aber
ing that the whole of the correspondence of Ler,"tigsci‘l
deen at that period was distinguished by great, his dr.;
• and wisdom, but that between his conduct and
for'',
respondence there was an infelicitous contos"„,4
conduct was marked with some infirmity of Pu,nrree
he failed to obtain from the French Govern"' "
pledge a hich ho w as, beyond all doubt, entitled .to
mend. it was remarkable that the prognostietal'objet
Lord Aberdeen had been verified by the events
Sir'
were now passing. In page 942 of the State P
Lord Aberdeen wrote to Lord Stuart de Roths3Yo't re;
for some explanation from the French Governm; folio
tive to the expedition against Algiers. Prince 'le giitj;
nac returned an answer, which was by no reenAns
factory; and Lord Aberdeen again wrote to Dor. 1,
-de Rothsay on the 23d of March, 1830. In retlYligo,
_Stuart de_ Roth Say said he saw Monsieur del`)., 01:;
and could not obtain from him any satisfactory ,
but that he would communicate with the Sulti'oe:olo,'
Sultan had sent Ali Pacha to Algiers, but thehlo tote'
squadron of the French would not suffer him too to if;
lie then came to Boulogne, where he was oblige
form quarantine, and he (Mr. Shell) believed '3 ostvo
reached Paris. Shortly after the fall of .Algien'ty, "9,9
sth of July, Monsieur de Polignac was in caPt''',o/1110
placed in immediate proximity to the guillotine+ fael i))0
crown was torn from the brow of Chides X., oltfie
throne of the barricades was given to that riirovoe
and sagacious man who now ruled the people 0f fete'
—one of the most sagacious men in that countli'lftrot
in greatness. The Duke' of Wellington, wlseetet
tta
sagacity, recognised- him as the rePre aot ty
of the national will. But was it for ;et
most extraordinary circumstance, that of
e,
'correopondence which he had read to the II°" tot
the -distinct intimation given by• Lord Aberdel'a site
expected a stipulatimi-that Algiers should not b
priated by France, after he. had stated with stteset‘,
ness his views as to the ultimate results on the euordisl:,
of the Mediterranean. Was it not most extol hisb
that, after the lapse of four months, .during ,wvaisked
French remained in possesmion of Algiers, and at oieo,
tensive acquisitions were made in the country, 'they,
should not have demanded, as a condition from frl'i
Government, that which .they had failed to obtl'"o44
the former, the importance of which had been s° tP,
and so emphatically expressed? It was true thAt• it
speech from the Throne in November, 18.10 jest),,
stated that no:doubt was entertained by 145 ilho e
Government that Louis Philippe would fulfil lint tbe,,,'
gageinents ; but it was most remarkable t'is,lgie",i
was no previous engagement with regard t° thri,
There was no arrangement binding' in diplonl
had never been obtained. The polished and wfr
cated statesman of France had, with his peculiar
sity, escaped from the grasp of the pale Eagtoiti
That was an important fact which could not beAjet
insisted upon, when they came to consider '4O
since taken place. The Tory Government of, '1 pairdii
recognised Louis Philippe when France was too mad,
sion of Algiers, and yet no engagement had beets Oh
ifor the abandonment of Algiers by France. posll,
came into power in 1830 ; they found France in on tie
sion of Algiers, no stipulation having been laded., „00
subject; and they found Louis Philippe recoguristro;iit
would now pass from 1830 to 1831. The achnn3h-e Pet,
of Lord Grey lasted to 1834. In that year t" ecci
Honourable Gentleman 'opposite came int°
that
and his administration was succeeded by clittks
Lord Melbourne, Nothing was said or de9erecoFhot
the whole of that time as to and'
tion of the right of France to Algler;cl, a'a
right was not denied, but it was not admit-) $OlO
exequatur was applied for for the English Consuiorbd
far it was necessary to apply for an exequalge peaibt
from France he would not stop to inquire.
~,aer.elo
from 1830 to 1831, and almost immediatelY, -Abe r
new government had been formed, and Lord P;rerPstoe
had been restored to the Foreign-office, a atri,,
onbad
able cenver-ation 14 found to have taken I:"Ag'esn
. subject .of .the Algerine business. Lord Aber"
e tthe'
himself given the substance of that iaonversaw Oof
'er°
Man could doubt the veracity of Lord Aberdeen, 0,8 tb
Count! St. Aulaire, or of At. Guizot. dotw 1300,
had been a misapprehension and nothing raore`maiofos
was a singular circumstance that the French k;erOtlie
dor should have so availed himself' of that cen'cee-
whieh Lord Aberdeen stated to have been Peri; of ,mpg
eidental arid fortuitous. What was the result
-conversation ? Why, immediately afterwards, Deere
of the French, in his speech from the throne, ilia Piny
ber, 1841, stated to the Chambers, that he I'Bllol
) measurea for the purpose of protecting the sectiV„
tout
foreign possessions of France from what "'"a toot
" external complications." M. Guizot
ol
Chamber the weaning of that phrase, whieh,,ire f
Lord Aberdeen had explained to Count Anat°s69
ha regarded the possession of Algiers by Fro° Thie
fait accompli, and had no objection to make' ad
could be no deubt but that Count St. Aulaire rit)
taken what Lord Aberdeen had said ; and on ;„,01,eil
of January, 1842, Lord Aberdeen wrote a dirt stn
Lord Cowley, in which ht, -clenied. that be :°,2 -fl tcat;la
that ha had no Ot,j'eetion to make but state
Ihe had merel.,,, inlinlated that he ha,d, 01/15,ebrtit-)k
to make, find remained silent on the subject! bOorl' I
' n'-',cn had been communicated to M. Guiat irtiPdp'
`tluizOt had made no observation on it. A Ye'?
rea
ant step had since been taken by the Fret', e`/r0e0,,,,ar
ment, and it was because he found that time v,11;
adopted by France were distinctly affecting .oper,,,,S
merce of this country with Africa that he felt it:, 51N t,,,
to call the attention of the House to th,.,-rtso;
On the 16th of December, 1843, a most inir--0 to of
:port of the Duke of Dalmatia had been presejifioageier
• King of' the French, which appeared in the ,e Dub 14
the 21st of December, 1843. The report of the rutty]
•Dalmatia was on the subject of the French Peshs-eacl7iir/
Algiers, and recommended that means should ue ot,rl
to prevent foreign States from taking advantagssou'oro
commerce of those possessions, and that duties ofactoil
raised upon the textual fabric of foreign rap the
fours
consumed in. Algiers. An ordonnance, date" fet,ete,
of December, 1843, containing a lie w tariff, 'Jr 10 'tea
upon this report, and a duty of 12 francs an 0 priliod
times per kilogramme was imposed upon foreig liPt. 50
calico, and a duty of four francs per ton let°et"
upon foreign shipping, This imposed a
..u'' ," tte
per cent. additiwal upon our commerce. °let'
look at the reeults of this tariff on British trtt a a
fg Tim a July 18, 1844, there aPPeare 101);id
te,e, llom their correspondent, dated Oran,
„i
in which the writer stated that British cotnie`'
had formerly been flourishang there, was 1110 Bt 1s
"14
fated, except fist ; that the port duties „Di eta
shipping, was four francs per ton, and on foreleich so;
ls el' •
it waz the same, except on Sardinian vesse p
favoured by treaty, anti admitted at two franeeso
c'est.
and that the general effect of the tariff had hen per es'
the eharges on British commerce from filtec to IL fore
to thirty per 'cent., which, in fact, amounted,ails
elusion.. What was the state of trade in Alger 0004!
This? M`Gregor, in his admirable b°o- and se
Statistics of Commerce," stated that in 184AlgeriS;rjio
1,846 French vessels entered the ports of 4;1;1000'
only 200 English ones. • Verily, the poorer w,i,:at
this region was at the lowest ebb. The ;e7ifelz`ol)l
Gentleman then read a report from the 1671 e rn el°
paper, which stated that from fin ordinance A t
issued by the French Government, thebedudtilletsuerrrecoth:qtti:::
on foreign manufacture were one-third in° bed' roi
France, and that ordinance was not to
did not quarrel with France because of tide to
,hich
Algiers. He did not dispute her stioa
country—he did not Wish to embark in 'a qa%,/,,ar,
might disturn the peace of the. House:7l/41 the
from SiT 7to. Peel)—but he wished that frozeoo of
rura .011 fie
t.,h@,y might learn to make some confiks iaoratt oes
iuture—that they should take into clsiediterril ore:
events now passing on the coast of the
ovi_e „bich_.`l
and which bore 4 clone reSemblante to th s frow,
coded the conquest of Algiers.—(llear, bWii; e pel
C. Napier.) :the cause of quarrel 'between