The Sun.
London, England, 1845-07-29 00:00:00

DERBY COURT BILL.

This Bill was read a second time, and ordered to be
read a third time to-morrow.

REAL PROPERTY BILL.
This Bill was read a first time, and ordered to he read
a second time to-morrow,
COUNTY RATES BILL. _

This Bill was read ;fir;tTirie,and ordered to be read
a second time to-morrow.
The other Bills were advanced a stage, and the House
ad.; f)urned till to-morrow.

HOUSE OF COMMONS, July 28.
(C, ittinued from our Afternoon Edition of yesterday.)
:De House resumed at Five o'clock.

A - REPORTS.
Charity and the E .
,0 I.:norts on Nelson'sthe
vii. werembirrig,rh,tand agreed to.
.Ei,-
said,
BILL.
. mr..
n.
i... . .
..naper,
it tat
discusso w itnhgi s lltson's
to
Bill,the otherpv‘ivilirehr
'''Ec4II,KELBY
not be in the
fmsiness upon 0,7 . -.,„
.. ghat erning. He should
0
*nd would
of Ole house to c0n51,.....•
the 'third reading
it6od fof know hos they Fc..l:lAt haw the dig'.
therefoie, .Yl' to
mission, a 3 be piended to move WI ariv-Adille4,,, upon
1
one of the elateg..;; the ,vt 4eW tr - ,
actAtithodatin,7
,Siti-J. altAllAll, vrit
the llun...A.lt•mber, would then tn,;Ya that the older of
the day on this Bill be discharged, for the purpose of
moving that lit be read a third time to-morrow, at
twelve 0'4.110ck..
,Sir VALENTINA BLAKE a
bout that as
suspended,
legis-
lative functions of that !rouse were ato be
he begged leave to make a few observations upon the
conduct of an individual, and upon the policy of the
Government during the present session.
After an observation from the SPEAKER, upon a point
of order,
The HON'. BALIONir proceeded' to my, that he
- - r

wished to address himself to the Right Honourable
Bart. at the head of the Government, who had promoted
several individuals to lucrative situations, but upon ene
individual had cast a most unenviable notoriety, It
would be in the recollection of the House that in the late
debate, when the question of the 'opening of Trinity
College, Dublin, to persons of all religious persuasions
was the subject of discussion, the Right Hon. Baronet
said that the Catholic Warden of Galway had signed a
petition in: favour of the Irish Colleges Bill. He (Sir
V. Blake) did not wish to interrupt—for an interruption
even to so great a gun as the Right Hon. Baronet would
not be acceptable—(Laughter)—althoughlhe were in error.
The Maynooth Bill was valiantly passed.—(Laughter.)
The Right Hon. Baronet was very improperly alluded to
in the discussion on that measure. It was stated that
he had been guilty of faithlessness to his party, and it
was ultimately alleged that he was guilty of perfidy.
The Right Honourable Baronet was not guilty of
anything like perfidy. He was not, certainly,
in unity with a moiety of his party, but that moiety had
no right to say that he had abandoned his party, because
the greater portion of his party supported him. Those
individuals who attributed perfidy to him had no idea of
the sacred scheme, and the working of the Bill.
ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE.

Mr. HENLEY wished to ask the -Right Honourable
Baronet the Secretary of State fur the Home Depart-
ment, whether the letter written by him to the magis-
trates a Stafford upon the subject of administering jus-
tice in their own houses applied generally to magistrates?
Sir J. GRAHAM said, that lion. Members would
perceive, frem the report which lay upon the table, that
in the case raferred to, the magistrate had decided a
case of trespass in his own house, without the presence
of a clerk or any other magistrate. He must certainly
repeat his opinion as to the impolicy of this line of con-
duct in all cases.

Mr. HENLEY said he had, according to his notice,
another question to put to the Right Hon. Baronet. He
wished to ask whether it was intended to bring in
any measure to relieve magistrates from the re-
sponsibility of dealing with those parties that might
be brought before them? His reason for putting the
question was, that there were now a great number of
railway Bills, in which clauses were inserted requiring
the magistrates to decide summarily upon cases brought
before them by the servants of the Companies.
Sir J. GRAHAM said that he did not see any neces-
sity to alter the law.
Mr. HUME said he thought the House would not
object to relieve the county magistrates of all respon-
sibility, and to have stipendiary magistrates appointed
is their places.
Sir J. GRAHAM believed that the county magis-
trates were of great service, and that such misconduct as
was complained of in the papers on the table was very
rare.