The Sun.
London, England, 1845-04-05 00:00:00

PARLIAMENTARY BUSINESS.
_ _
__ THURSDAY, APRIL 3.

The following Bills were referred to the Select Committee
on Petitions for Private Bills:

Londonderry and Coleraine Railway.
Londonderry and Enniskillen Railway.
London and South Western Railway (Epsom Branch).
London and Brighton Railway (Wandsworth Branch).
London and Brighton Railway (Dorking Branch).

Liverpool and Bury Railway (Bolton, Wigan, and Liver-
pool Railway and Bury Extension),—Report from Select
Committee on Standing Orders read; Bill ordered to be
brought in by Mr. Wilson Patten, Mr. Greenall, Dr. Bow-
ring, and Mr. Walker.

bunstable and London and Birmingham Railway,—Report
from Select Committee on Standing Orders read; Bill ordered
to be brought in by Mr. Mangles, Mr. Henry Stuart, and Mr.
Astell.

Southampton and Dorchester Railway,—Report from Select
Committee on Standing Orders read ; Bill ordered to be
brought in by Mr. ➢lildinay, Mr. George William Hope, and
Colonel Darner.

NOTICES GIVEN AT THE PRIVATE BILL OFFICE.

Epsom and Dorking Railway,—Committee on petition,
Monday, April 14.
North Woolwich Railway,—Second reading, Monday,
April 7.
Cornwall Railway,—Second reading, Monday, April 7.
Great Southern and Western (Ireland) Railway,—Second
reading, Monday, April 7.
London and South Western (Epsom Branch) Railway,--
Committee on petition, Monday, April 14.
London and Brighton (Wandsworth Branch)Railway,—
Committee on petition, Monday, April 14.
London and Brighton (Dorking Branch) Railway,—Com-
mittee on petition Monday, April 14.
Staines and Richmond Railway,—Committee on petition,
Monday, April 14.
Eastern Union Railway Amendment,—Second reading,
Monday, April 7.

Standing Orders Committee,—Resolutions reported ;
1. " That, in the case of the Dunstable and London and
Birmingham Railway petition, the Standing Orders ought to
be dispensed with :—That the parties be permitted to pro-
ceed with their Bill."

2. " That, in the case of the Liverpool and Bury Railway
petition (Bolton, Wigan, and Liverpool Railway and Bury
Extension), the Standing Orders ought to be dispensed
with :—That the parties be permitted to proeeed with their
Bill."

3. " That, in the case of the Wilts, Somerset, and Wey-
mouth Railway petition, the Standing Orders ought to be
dispensed with :—That the parties be permitted to proceed
with their Bill."

4. " That, in the case of the Southampton and Dorchester
Railway petition, the Standing Orders ought to be dispensed
with :—That the parties be permitted to proceed with their
Bill."

5. "That, in the case of the Lyme Regis Waterworks Petition,
the Standing Orders ought to be dispensed with :—That the
parties be permitted to proceed with their Bill on inserting a
provision that the Commissioners shall not make any lateral
deviation from the line or situation of the Aqueducts and Re-
servoir, as delineated on the Plan."

6. " That, in the case of the Cromer Protection from the Sea
Petition, the Standing Orders ought to be dispensed with :
That the parties be permitted to proceed with their Bill, and
that after the first Reading thereof the Bill be referred to the
Select Committee on Ntitions for Private Bills, who shall
examine and report to the House whether the Standing Or-
ders for Bills of the Second Class have been complied with,
substituting in the said Standing Orders the months of Fe-
bruary and March for the months of October and November
for giving the notices in the Gazette and Newspapers, and re-
quiring proof to be given of the deposit of plans, &c., and Ap-
plication to Owners having been made in the course of the
said months."

7. " That, in the case of the Totnes Market Petition, the
Standing Orders ought to be dispensed with :—That the par-
ties be permitted to proceed with their Bill on referring the
datum line to some fixed point, stated in writing on the Sec-
tion.

" That the Committees on this and the twopreceding Bills
do examine, in the first place, how far such Orders have been
complied with, and do report the same to the House on the
Report of the Bills."
8. " That, in the case of the Dublin Cemeteries Petition,
the Standing Orders ought not to be dispensed with."
First seven Resolutions agreed to.—Report to lie on the
Table.

SECOND REPORT FROM THE
CLASSIFICATION COMMITTEE ON RAIL-
WAY BILLS.
MARTI.% 4° DIE MARTI!, 1845.
Resolved—That a Committee of five Members be appointed,
to be called " The Classification Committee of Railway Bills,"
and that three be the quorum of such Committee.
MARTI.% 11° DIE MARTI!, 1845.
Committee appointed :—Sir Robert harry Inglis, Mr. Fox
Maule, Viscount Mahon, Sir William Somerville, Mr. Wilson
Patten.
Ordered—That the Committee have power to send for per-
sons, papers, and records.
MARTIS, 18° DIE MARTI!, 1845.
Ordered—That the Committee have power to report their
opinion from time to time to the House.