The Sun.
London, England, 1844-03-09 00:00:00

s „
cahiered. Another. article set, forth that if an. officer behaved;, on Wily for discussion, but he hoped the Committee wools!
in' a scandalous' and infamous manner, and unworthy the cone not discuss it on the present motion. He thought
that -vest
duct of a gentleman and au officer; he was also to be tried by a little good could arise from discussing the subject- of duelling.- -
court-martial, and cashiered ; and in. another , article, it was ' that evening. With respect to the constitution of a Court of
stated • expressly, by _ order of her Majesty, that every. Honour, which should inflict certain punishments, pecuniarY
officer was acquitted 'of disgrace for refusing to fight or otherwise, in his opinion it would not be attended with .
or accept a • challenge. • Having thus shown what was required any beneficial results. He was of opinion, that pecuniary fines,
by the articles of war, in. the case of any officer who refused to would not be popular in England. In former days the Bilal
fight, or accept a challenge, he asked how it was possible for . power interfered most beneficially with duelling. He need not
any body of officers, upon their oaths—men of education—who : recal to the recollection of the House the numerous instance, 9 •
were told that it was no disgrace to refuse a challenge, to try : in which that power had been so exercised, with the nap'
a man for couduct unbecoming.an officer, and notwithstanding ff He believed that unless that power were ye" •
their oaths, tell him that he was
.cashiered for not fighting a stored
.to the Crown, it would be impossible to put down
duel? Why, such conduct would be a violation of oaths, of duelling. It was in.ain to look to legislation to remedl the
decency, and of common sense, and •he did not believe .the evil. He believed it could only be cured by the state. of r----:
Noble Lord could adduce any case. of- . that nature. • The pular feeling on the subject.—The vote was then agreed to. -tin •
Noble Lord had had opportunities of proving if there were '2,327,196/. was then voted for the pensioners of ilinainha •
such cases. While Secretary at War, he had, in accordance . Hospital.
with his duty in that high station, to recommend these Articles On the motion that 38,0001. be granted for retired allowances,
to her Majesty, and when the Noble Lord told him that the Colonel RAWDON said that be thought this . was a pioPer
Government possessed the power of putting down duelling opportunity of mentioning that Colonel Moore, the brother of
in the army, and that it ought to be put down, he asked.' Sir John Moore, had given up his retired allowance when he
the Noble •Lord what he had been about during the five years found that his private fortune was sufficient to enable him to
he was in office, and why he had not taken some such steps in live without it.—The vote was agreed to. • •
that direction which he found fault with the present Govern ORDNANCE ESTIMATES.
ment for not taking? But he could assure the oble Lord that v .
the subject had not escaped the attention of her. Majesty's Go- Captain BOLDERO, in rising to move the Ordnance essf.
vernment.. However, as.some reforms were to he submitted.to timates, said that there had been an expense of about 03,809 _
her Majesty on the matter, he was, precluded from: entering .
more particularly into- it at present. With respect to the in the expenditure upon the Sappers and Miners. But in tne
expense of barracks and barrack masters there was a dimiaTe
Noble Lord's statement; that officers were broke for not fight- . don. to the amount of 168,0001. ; and that reduction • W°T",.
ing duels, .he . (Sir H. Hardinge) would refer to the case of have been greater if it had not been necessary to augment ta'
which an Hone. Gentleman, a • few evenings ago, had said an- ooMmissariat in China. An additional charge would be nee
account had come by the last mailfrom the West Indies, where cessary for the expense of rebuilding the powder-works at
an' officer..was tried .for .having submitted to an insult. Of Waltham Abbey. At the Cape of Good Hope also, an Men;
course he could not mention the name of the officer, but he diture was incurred, in consequence of the destruction Of en •
would read the charge against :an officer who was brought to wing of the fort, occasioned by the indiscretion of two chilatensi
a court-martial in the year 1843, for scandalous and infamous Playing with lucifer matches. The charges for the restoratio
conduct, unbecoming the charaCter of an officer and a gentle- of the Tower would not be felt by the country; for in the sr
~
man. in submitting to be :charged with ungentlemanlike and Tropriation of the new building to the 'purposes of stores, toe
blackguard conduct, and with not-refuting the same charge, or country would be compensated for the expense.. By calculating
reporting it-to his commanding. officer, or taking measures to the price of fuel in the two countries he found that the
alr;
exculpate himself 'from charges so derogatory' to his character. ante to an officer in England would be 61. 10s. a year, an, 'f,
Now he (Sir H. -Hardinge) thought that that officer ought to Ireland 71. 10s. Since they had been in office they had °Ce
have gone before his brother officers and asked them to try the fected a reduction in the Ordnance estimates of 303,4" L an-
have
charge ; but, according to the Noble Lord's version, the officer nually. He hoped this would be taken as an earnest eft. a, • ,
was .tried for refusing to.fight a duel. Such a thing was most integrity of their desire to reduce the expenditure as roue.
improbable. He ( Sir. H. Hardinge) had been for 40 years in the possible. •
army, and he hadzerer heard of such a case aethe rda- Dr. BOWRING said he did not intend to divide. the CO.
.02.
gined. •He would the another instance in the same b
eary of 1843. rnittee on any of these items, nor did he mean todetain sett
He took the most recent cases as the Noble Lord said that the Committee, except to regret that a similar course had not bseees
system was going on atthe present day of officers being forced adopted in the ordnance. as in the other votes. He saw tit te.
by the regulations of the service to fight duels when they ought .large part of the expense was incurred for the colo-aies ; I
to have the matter settled by . a Court of Inquiry. The case thought that the colonies ought to bear part of the 'burden
one.° ,
was this :—lrr April, 1843, emofficer • was tried for scandalous their own defence. He saw that the lonian Islands did so,
and infamous conduct, unbecoming an officer and a gentleman, why not the others? had
in having. submitted to be .stigmatised as a " liar" and a Sir HOWARD DOUGLAS said, as the lonian Islands
" scoundrel," and suffering other opprobrious epithets to be ap- •been referred to, he hoped he might be allowed to make 4'f, ~
plied to him by another individual. - The • Court found him observations with respect to them. They formed a most .
guilty, and he waseashiered. He (Sir H. Hardinge) had • in- teresting ceuntry, from their soil, their position on the verresse
quired into that case, and he found that that individual had con- civilisaton, their climate, and classic associations. These isia7, ; ••
ducted himself . in a.- most ungentlemanlike manner, and had been thrown back on this country for regeneration and ei/-tee
~
that he bad not dared to face an inquiry by his brother satiun. :But their progress had been arrested, and their presPe,a .. ,
officers.—( Hear, . hear.) . _Accordingly they . forced him- - injured ,by the fixed contribution which they were co ha
.0,, e ,
to a court-martial. How such cases could be distorted in the- to pay out of their revenue, to this country, towards 4* ~,es
wayin which the Noble Lord had done, he (Sir H. Hardinge) pen-e of their military defence. That contributiaa,
~e 3,
could not -understand.. Indeed,, in the case of one officer in- 35,000/. a year, for this purpose alone; other expend ear,
suiting another; and not making a demand for explanation, he were etnnpetted tcr pays reiSed that sum to 54,000I.a Y;as
might be put•into " Coventry" by his brother officers, and thus The whole ' revenue of the' islands, some years lig°, 00 •
find himself •in 'a 'very unpleasant position.—( Hear, hear.) 180,000/. ;it had since-been so much reduced that it was T:. o, •
Well, he would: take the Noble Lord upon that point.' He no more than 106,000/.1- • the fixed contribution /.her had
knew the ease ola fieldofficer,•who, being a religious individual, amounted to no less-thin '5O per cent. of the revenue. II 'lt of
and having. conscientious scruples on the matter, declined to been unceasing in his representatimieeto the Governor e" ie • ,
fight a duel, because •he felt thathe ought ' not to sin against the •neces,ity• of making -erne abatemetii in this contributioeleit
,the laws of God. . The -officers- of his regiment, from the ' fatattrof•the islands: • The depreciation' in the price of rre.,
,manner'in which his name was used, in 'consequence felt very eet experts, currants and oil, had dried up the sources 0 0, ; i
uneasy ; butehe presents Commatider-in-Chief protected him • •Y he:kite theessh they had' reduced taxation and made ever,
to the extent', of having ' the • matter • ' inquired into., .sse lef),stitete; the contribution was found to be exec
pert'
The cause of quarrel was , investigated, and the result- 0 P itee' 'The - state of their public institutions Wal 'ere ;
was that the proper conduct of that field officer was corrobe- • 111. ''rf‘3l3le:. ' There were no asylums, and.the !made° 'cot
rated and confirmed, • and his brother officers -withdrew, their ni ogled together with felons. • The -lonian Islands-" wereesse
objection-0,1.4m; and he waenow one of the ' most resPeeted. e oti!e.; they.. were in an_ anomalous position, beot. do
officers in he service. Again in 1604 Sir Charles MorganOn 0° "'lea and - independent States. They should n thee •
the ease of a lieutenant who had associated with the surgeon: of •thir ' duty '' to - that interesting people unless ~,....
his regiment, notwithstanding his --having been ' collared and'- re traced-something of that fixed contribution.—( Lord Stsnwte.
struck by hinti and who had been brought -to trial for conduct' 1 'fie ha" dene'it'")
unworthy an • officer-s-in that case Sir-Charles Morgan- wrote titer he had not brought forward this question stronglY ,u"aeog
He appealed to the Government4w;
an.observation *Upon the second article ,of 'the charge-to the last year ; and he asked the Noble Lord whether be was ue.....ent,
effect that it watt tantamount to it a crime to refuse fairly with him, as a friend and supporter of the Govern Toto ,
fighting a duel,: and that •if he had been aware of it before the in not acquainting him a ith the step he had taktn. , ,IlLed`doile - '
investigation - that ~he would not - have. suffered the article to appeal to the House to say whether the Noble Loud a Noble
have -been broughtss forteard. He ' (Sir -1-1. Hardinge) could metice to him in not communicating to him what thethe of : ,
only appeal to the-Noble Lord, that in every case with which Lord said he had done. But he would still exercise his I the
he had anything to do, and having.made every possible inquiry making these representations to the Committee..- • Inlo
sup
.
•
at the Horse Guards with respect to other cases,'-he could not poor ofthe island were begging about the streets, there
find an instance of .an officer being brought to trial because he no poor-house to receive them. He built a poor4oose,it ap.
. •
,• : :•• : . it answered exceedingly well; but
..a fey/ months' ague 4355 ,
was wanting iu courage to fight a:duel.
Colonel ,FOX asked the Hon. and Gallant Gentleman if peered that it was abolished. He would appeal to the. r -or
he did' not know' of any instances of the Sovereign dispensing mitteewhether he had not a right' to state the cii,:ther
,with the, services of officers, because --they were • put into stances ; and he appealed to them , again to- sal we doe'
Coventry for not- fighting a duel ? -' That he believed. was the Noble Lord had treated him as he ought to halade out
generally -the way in which cases of that kind were disposed of. in not first communicating with him; after he had in
~It 138
Sir H.- HARDINGE said if he understood the question of a case so strong that the Noble Lord-himself requested liner for
the Gallant Officers it seemed to imply that the Sovereign 'of would not press for the production of the papers, the rurosed
the country was -a party-to punishing officers for 'not fighting which was yet uncancelled by the House. If he ha° Via, se•
dueler ' - . - for those papers he should have had the credit of ha, '
. Colonel FOXe-The Soiereign•• acting- by the' advice of the complished the redaction.
Ministers Of the' Crown: • - • ' , The conversation on this subject then dropped. opt of
• Sit HENRY HARDINGE-knew•no instance' of an officer's Mr. WILLIAMS complained of 'the immense. tile VI•
services being dispensed with-in such a case, except where the money spent in.building fortifications and new baillteP'„7,oool'
. harmony •of the regiment rendered it necessary to remove cer-' barracks at Manchester alone were put down at
eireets t et
tainOfficers.—( Hear, hear;- from' Lord HowielY.) But the There were others also at Newport and Bristol
"1-,ocki
Noble 'Lord could not - expect • that the army should be' • sob- there in the state of Manchester that required those sum for
jected to- restrictions and restraints to which other parts of the now more than at any former time? He thought this suw
community were not subjected. -- - . • the erection of new barracks was most enormous.' - _e; riot'
• ' Sir A. L. HAY asked what would be the condition of Captain PECHELL, in alluding to the late militrosese
officers in the army if 'they were not allowed 'to-take 'steps to , which had occurred at Brighton, said, that after -th vs, be .
remove any stigma which any young and ill-tempered officer Punishment Which had been inflicted' upon the • Off.tnaiester'
might- happen to cast upon them ? He questioned if duelling was did not wish to do more than allude very bridge() Fe..,,, be:
• as prevalent in the army asin other portions of the community. Damage to the amount of 50/. had been done, and itiste‘e,so ,
The ,might do- away?with duelling in the army by means of fore' tated that compensation would be made by the wbcpros
stll ' I
statutes, but he would tell them that they ought to pause be- to the foreigner whose house had been attacked. met°
the 'lt
• fore they prevented-the officers of the British army from asserts perty had been destroyed, and he was now without,e sne
ing their. honour and repelling indignity. , . of subsistence ; and he (Captain Pechell) hoped that ifeeesieB
Captain • BERNAL said a very wide field had been opened Hcin. Gentleman also would suggest some means for'
sub'
by the discussion which had: taken place, and he thought it the distresses of those persons.
was necessary to consider at once whether it were right to go Sir H. HARDINGE said that whatever might have be,e-suh's
into the whole question on the present motion.—( Hear, hear.) intention of the soldiers originally with respect toraisioree tiw•
He was perfectly prepared to discuss • the subject whenever it scriptian amongst themselves for the purpose of repael pro'
should be the pleasure of .the House to do so. There was a expenses and damage done, the course adopted by '
vast deal to be said upon it.—( Hear.). The whole system was secutor's solicitor had entirely frustrated it. . se 00'
an anomalous. one. They had statutes which pronounced After a few words from Mr. Aceimegy and' Sir P s
duelling, to. be , an. offence nothing short of murder. DINUE in reply, the vote was agreed to. ' ' gen°
—( Hear, hear.) They had juries endeavouring to evade these A sum of 110,74571. was then voted, to defray the
_co, ' i
practices ;'`they had judges, who -were prepared to give them of the Royal corps of Engineers, and Sappers and Atilery ao'
343,527/. was voted to defray the expenses of the aryl 0
the :go. bye ;.. whilst the _majority of That House were always e
ready to assist in the evasion. Under these circumstances, gunnery department. • '
rrack'Yea't
would any man• say that the widow-of in officer who had fallen 391,1971. was voted to pay the salatiee of ba
. Its
lin a duel should, on that
.account, be. deprived of a pension ? on foreign stations.
i (Hear, hear.) Let them either say at once that an officer of
e the army should be eupported in his conscientious views, or let charges of the ordnance works, &c.—'Phis vete was aeeses
A vote of 483,721/. was then proposed for defrarYeieeegteof e
thernhe prepared.to treat his widow, if he fell in a duel, in the A vote of 166,7961. was then proposed for the ear
'
- same manner that they would treat the widow of an officer who the ordnance surveys.
sfell inbattle. He (Cape Bernal) had no wish to interfere with In answer to a question from Colonel RAWLION,ekee ieloreo, ::
the discretion of the Crowns He knew perfectly well that no Sir R. PEEL said the Report of the serve
land would be laid before the r testi, sess'
officer's widow had an absolute right to a pension. He would House in the course 01 l•
00
The vote was then agreed to.
' not, however, enter into the question on-the present occasion, .
considering, as he did, that it ought to form the subject of a
A:vote of 229,580/. for the expenses of ordnance store,
substantive motion.—(Hear, hear. )' Without assuming to thee proposed. ilorf
himself the right of advising the Committee, he must say that In answer to a question from Sit. C. NAFIER,_ the sa
,he thought itevould be much better-to %naive any further die- - . Captain BOLDERO said that in all new ships.
mission. and marines were supplied with the new muskets. el ,
Colonel FOX explained. , ' The vote was then agreed to. , i:he sharg
Mr..P.' BOItTHWICK said the question simply was, whe- A vote of 163,680/, was proposed for'defraying the
ther-a particular lady should be -deprived of a pension which of the superannetion and pension list. ' of t-1
:
under ordinary.circumstances she would have received, merely Captain PE{- wished to call the a .tea e ea - ,
because another person haft committed a crime. As at present Right Hon. Gentleman the Secretary-at-War ejled f°,oo
n advised he (Mr. -P. ,Berthwick)-thouglit it would be a most some hardship. A poor pensioner had been colnr,ii peri
to ,
unjustifiable mode of punishing an offence to visit it upon the into a workhouse, wad during the time he was eberee;ereoli.o,
'ttetion . to
°
person who did not perpetrate it, and who, of all persons in the
kingdom; wintld hale been - most anxious to prevent it had' itLek ul for
was withdraWn. When he was dischaed fromt',„ see Pea •
pension was renewed, but its proceeds were vet de ,
been in her power. , diens until the expenses to which they had 'be had beef' f -
. .
Lord HOWICKs said the Hon. . and Gallant Officer near
him (Sir A. Leith Hay) hod argued that duelling was abso. frayed:. •He (Captain Pee sell) wished 'to know
maintenance during his stay in the workhouse if this t
"•,',
lutely necessary in the army. Now, he did not ask them to legs!? e
pronounce an opinion either way; but he did ask them either Sir H. HARDINGE said it undoubtedly WaS 1101.'
00' -.1
' Of 0 '
to sanction or discourage it consistently.—( Hear, hear.) . If. The vote a
ss then
agreed'ag to. • •
expenses ~,
A vote was reed o 174,688/. for. the eels
.00ossee
they sanotioned duelling, it was nothing less than gross cruelty.
.and injustice.to deprive Mrs. Fawcett of her pension; if they missinlat suiplies. d the • l
came to- a resolution to put down thepractice, then, however. The Cliaritstarr then- reported progress an . ,VW
~
painful, it might perhaps ,be necessary. -to , pursue that course. resumed." Commttee °' - • e
'The Hon. and , Gallant Officer oposite (Sir • Henry The House then resolved itself into a x loot
'Hardinge) - •had . only answered his, argument in Ara a and Means. R moved I
be t
.miserable spirit of personality.—( Cries of "No, no," from both ea 0 ,
sides ofehe.Houee.) • He repeated the observation...
.He had of 8,000,000/. out of the Consolidated Fund-
was
order ~
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUE
The vote was agreed to , and the Report " ' - ,44
brought the question forward as, a general one, and what waslto,
the Hon. and Gallant Officer's reply ? - Why be said, tbat.the brought up on Monday next. . , . the
Mutiny Act provided so and so, and he asked, whyeif that was The House-then resumed.. .' • aiding e ,
• not sufficient, he (Lord Howick) had not ridded to its provi- Dr. BOWRING presented a petition. reog j.,
and it
e sions. What did it signify whether he did, or did not, during cheater Railway.—( Against it as we unders%°"_sied st;
• the time he held the office of Secretary at War, suppreis duel- The other Orders of the Day were then deVce.
ling in the army.? The Hon. and Gallant Officer knew very' House adjourned at a Quarter past Eleven 0 t''''
Well that questions connected with the• discipline of the army ,
never came under his (Lord Howick's) notice, except when
^ some particular difficulty arose ; and during the time that he
was Secretary at War, it so happened that there never was a
case-similar to that of Mrs. Fawcett's. His notice was .never
called to this anomaly, and therefore it was that he had never
. thought of adopting any means for its removal. But he begged
to tell the Hong and Gallant Officer, that if while he was Se-
cretary at War a case had been brought before him, in which
he - was • called upon to exercise the painful discretion of ad-
vising her Majesty not to grant a pension to an
officer's widow because he had fallen in a duel, he would not
have given, that advice unless he had been prepared to carry
.out the principle, and to take every measure in his power to put
an end
.to duelling in the army.—( Hear, hear.) Now what
was -the - argument of the Hon. and Gallant Officer? He
to ted, and .he ,believed correctly, that officers, practically
and subitantially, were. .brought before courts-martial for
refusing to fight duels. It was perfectly true that the letter of
the law was against duelling-the articles of war were most
'express and decisive.; but the officer was called wen to do
nothing anbecomieg the.character• of a gentleman, and if he
received an insult without taking immediate steps for redrest, he
was liable to a court-martial. An . officer, had been brought
before a court-martial in India for an offence of that desCription.
. Thecharge was that he had received a blow, and had not taken
steps to obtain that legitimate and-,immediate redress to which
•he •wa.e, entitled for so gross an ineele • The measures were an
appeal to a superior' authority and duel. But it was per-
fectly well known that if an officei took the course of appealing
to a superior authority, he had the punishment inflicted upon
him which was known by the name of being sent to Coyentry.
Under penalty of this sentence, he was virtually compelled to
choose the alternative of the duel. . ,
- ' Sir HENRY. HARDT NGE inquired as to the particulars of
the case to which the Noble. Lord referred. • '.
- Lord 410 WICK said the ecase was exactly What he. had
stated. :Hexatber thought that the officer belonged .to tbe •
Indian army, but the two services were governed exactly. hys
the same rules. In another ease, a field-officer had been actu-
ally sot. to Coventry for refusing to fight a duel on religious
,grounds. The Hon. and . Gallant Officer (Sir A.• Leith Hay)
had argued. that dhelling wag the keystone of the honour of the
army. , , . . •
• Sir A. LEITH. HAY said he had not used that expree;.
sion.—( Hear, hear.) - , ,
Lord 110 WICK begged the. Hon. and Gallant Officer's pare
don. He had meant only to state the purport of his argument.
The Hon.: and Gallant Officer had argued that duelling:was
necessary to maintain the discipline and honour of the army.
Sir A. LEITH HAY—Most certainly, I
Lord HO WICK-In the case to which he had just referred,
had the officer been a subaltern instead of a field-officer, he
would probably have been forced out of the army.-(Hear,
hear.) He would again say that they were imperatively called
uppn to
,adept a decided course, and not suffer the present ,
anomalous state of. things to continue. . • !
Captain BERNAL hoped the Hon. and Gallant Officer ( Sir -
.H. Hardiege) would not be tempted by the Noble Lord's re-
marks into the discussion of this subject. —( Loud cries of" Hear,
hear.") He•thought nothing could be more unfair than the
attack made by the. Noble Lord, but he trusted that the Right
Hon. Gentlemaneagainst whom it was directed would main- :
taida judicious silence.—( Hear, hear. )
Sir H. HARDINGE said the Noble Lord had talked
of miserable personalities, He. House to say
left it to the , .
whether the Noble Lord Seat justified in that K
r
(Hear, and cheers.) .He had simply reminded jie nralgoble
Lord, that the present Government had been
in office only
,
two years, and asked, him why • the late Government had not
wont-
ee ,
remedied the evils of which he cornpleinetle-liee 7see-eaes%, l-
ready to meet the Noble Lord whenever the question ,

0,-
-7... t..... oi lalorg*
[ADVERTISEMENT.]2—DROPSIES CCBAlnfi'rf elllarit),''''
11WAT'S PILLS.--EXTICAORDINARY CAS6*-'-1. fe4 .1114F'
ggle, residing in one of the almshouses in €2.1./ 1/4.00,0.
Mestminster, was by the watery dropsy so iireacuati;fo/ ,0
M body and legs as to be increased to double her
(iliacc.J, or
Medical man . had declared her past all cure
~..,,,.ot,,v;,a
death was daily expected), yet, however elltra.,ei te''..,,,-T,
appear, she was reduced several incites in buillie•q.: via
wo '
o'lnYd ae
rf fewtl i dreomseesdayr,,mthaeyabbeovceonexsitrdearoeradiansarYaolleeiratietirvvii7F,,„:rilliicioolii
any kind of dropsy, however long-standing,
case may be.—Sold at Professor llollo:aY,tor --intalich)e'icilis,.o; ~
244, 'Strand (where advice maybe had ora
all respectable medicine venders througlOut.6(l., Als4'
world, in pots and boxes at Is. lid., 2s. 9d? 4s. . who '
and 335. each. • , T cloQl3' Slgt°
The Dublin Papers state that Mr. ering,ilta, oil
was 'examined as witness for the Crown, "„eatien"
trials, has ceased to be the Dublin Corresr ' 1.
.11.1617‘ing .Herald.
eV. . -.
''
BIRTHS. 1.,,1y 0 il f
On the 3d nit ;at Larkhill; Worcester, or . dC - ;
George Bayley,' of a son. • e laaY - ,f , 4
' . Ob. the 23d ult., at Boulogne-sur-Mer, the .
_46 t
~,
IJdny, Esq., Bengal Civil Service,' of a son. • e Ste' 3tai
tf°s''
On the 28th ult., at Caen, Madathe Henri d P
of V
a daughter. . 1, o•ar, . of
On ' the 2d inst., Mrs. John Edward FllB° f. 1.,
11. '''' ' ' '
Sussex, of a son.
Albany
-road,
bthenve leaidl3:ooffaMdaarukoliVteirll.iani fib7rte-co- ',
v,,,. ~,ccv,,‘ i
5A h t 4,0
~
On the, 3d inst.; at the Vicarage 1-iouse,
the lady of the Rev. W Marsh, of a son.
cam. , • :Iv
On the 2d inst. at Montpellier-terra,
lady of E. IL Blakeney, Esq., Royal • et ,
ihe ioir. ,
ment, of a son. '
f l'ieti
Mathews, Esq., of a daughter.
On the 6th inst., at Clapham-rise, Stirre•Y' . ~,,,t• sl)t. ".;
lady o . ,'
On the 6th inst., at Maidstone, the ...,., the,
Colonel Griffiths, of a sop].
On the 7th inst., at. Gloitcester-place,
,iles,e, ortoy,.,
lady of the Rev. W. Palmer, of S• LT
daughter. Portman' sfr.l7 of , '
CAhiaeniteitni.ifii;,,l.: ..:,

___..-----------_,,f. 1
MARRIED. ,s.,,r'to
On the 28th ult., at All Souls, LangilataPlac7._buttm4,,
lebone,. Mr. James W. Crichton, of Nwingtoi4.ooi,
Loveday, eldest daughter of W. Gard, Es4•' late° •l'
Cornwall. . • OP o
` Dyer i', ,
On the sth at St. Marylebone, Thomas ~.fotr, f, ,
ton Dyer, Esq., 36th Regiment Madras 'Satie
eiP,lntoi
Mariannette Rosabella Eliza, widow of the late t."
J.
W. Humphreys, Madras Army. .ie
. f, afr-

DIED.
.On the 4th inst ,at Ryder Isle of Wight, "71-• ~j
JO'
Co:Tll.lc;rlle'r,lll6i,h iin:S.itil:.,g: i,n j
IT.: itrand, Clement, the intlll3t . a
i tiara IJr`''
On the 6th inst., at lloxton, Richard, son of 11-c .
Clxto, Esq. 001' 1%.
On the 6iii inqt., "fr. Thomas Rowley, of East-
~olicet
96,10.. A, (..tii iii,t:, in Cllarlotte-street, Pollan' ~.,•4,0
1 n 140113 Esq.. landscape vanter, aged 91. _,,,,,110
On the 7,t I, ;iv.. , at Robert-strat, Ilatopstead-P,
,i
William Bei' —. I .53. """ ''
lif
--
:-------- - 013;, W.
Londoh : 1'e4.4114 .144ligleA A1.1:1-:101
-No 112, Striind; at Tit ,5414 Ntide', ftd.ll2, _IL
CoulltY of bliddleges, Saturday, Iklarth 9, 164.*