The Sun.
London, England, 1844-03-02 00:00:00

'IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT.

- ---,-----------• - - !
'l,, ROUSE .OF LORDS; March 1.
.te Earl of SaArresnuity, in ,the absence of the,
Chancellor, • took his seat upon. the Woulsack ?rtlY before Five o'Clock.
.
Map, MESSAGE FROM THE COMMONS. . :
11F.sengers from the Commons' brought up certain
"- . .
LANDLORD AND TENANT COMMISSION.
.. .
se,Tfrd., .MONTEAGLE, seeing his Noble Friend in his
;117, !fished to put a question to him on. a subject in •
bj.iu the public at large,-and more :especially the, Irish
0, felt a deep interest. In putting ills question, he
lq,c‘ed to state that he entertained- no, distrust of his
tri)
Wte Friends' He believed that hii "Noble Friend was
h,' diligent in the discharge of the public duty with
1" he had been- entru.,ted ; but tne public were
and Tng.with the utmost anxiety towards the Landlord
v.. meant Commission in Ireland, and he wished to
it,` 'lts Noble Friend if be could inferm the House when
s4ssuld•be likely that the public.ould, be put in pos-
7tll
on of the results of their labours:
:'nite Earl of DEVON had
~ no difficulty. in . an-.
the question •,_ and he was glad that anoppor-
that'l had been afforded him -of stating why it was.
..Of Was present then at that moment, instead i
niide 'ls in Ireland. It so happened that he had ,
Arrangementseenee,7 to go to Dublin for the purpose of,
40„, ,
:ins g further evidence, and. had intended being in .
liss‘"l at the present time ; ' but a few days since hei
se7otteeived. a subpmna from the Court of Queen's peech,
at thacanding him to attend as a witness in a criminal •cese,
so next Devonshire assizes. -Ile. had endeavoured
„Set the evidence which he should have to give, made
-sites of
cons . , admission, but the. defendant appeared. to '
tittmer it essential to the case that he (the Earl of
~
Ile .2YI). should be examined, and. he was afraid that
,over be detained in England • until the trial was _.
lah,,r,' Ins absence, however, would not interrupt the
ere of of the Commission. ' His colleagues were
his"wefed to proceed with " the ' inquiry during
thes„arbsenee, and they . had ,consentsd to do' so;
see,,-'°re, no delay would take. place in . con-
hot-esoll,e,e of his detention in . England.. ~ He was
that crY that he - had the opportunity of stating
ipubr-e was not idly or unnecessarily neglecting his
.4103 'e duty. It was generally supposed, although the
las;Psitlon was ineorrect; that , the - only busis
Thsst °I the Comthission - was to collect evidence. ,
no "d was a most important
.part. of the duty,
aels 's'l'4 ; but any person. who. took . upon , them-
44.1 " the responsibility of offering aliggestiOn as to
Y pro
. thek, Posed change in the existing law, should make
Amin elves acquainted with that law; and therefore a not ,
s
to di "octant part of the -duties of the Commission was
• tissA7at the information on, the subject 'of the rela-
' asses-,T,ween landlord and tenant, which was already
Shi-"J'e to the public. lie could assure their Lord-
. ,„ps that the taking of evidence was not the only
also be that devolved OR the Commission ; :and be
taisaC,egged to assure them that thelaboars of the Coni-
eihie—n would be prosecuted With' as little " delay tesPes--
-
cOTAHEITE. . • ,
%rss, BROUGHAM rose to move for copies of the
S.Sl,4londenee 'which - had 'taken: place between, the
Cr. missionaries in the South Sea Islands and the
ssd 'innient, relating to the affairs •of Otaheite. He
se„crstood there .would he no objection to the produc-.
T` TI that correspondence: '
tille,ue, Earl of ABERDEEN had no , objection ' to. pr.o-
s•hO' the correspondence.. Last year
,a Noble Marquis,
hire was not now. in his place, had. put a question to
srlti was
Earl of :Aberdeen) connected midi: the -subject,.
esd he had assured the Noble Marquis that he need be "•
er s
kiss; -o anxiety as to the manner in which the
gse '°naties would be treated, ,for ..the French Go-
aMent had assured him' that they' should en- •
free everY protection,had- guaranteed to the& the -
4 exercise of their functions. papers,which•laad been
Len the table of . the Honsessbowed that' stiO haul •
th7s,
,the ease,. and he had great satisfaction in stating
siens,",F had not received any edmPlaiiits from tbeill:iss
by l% in those islands on the subject: It *as only
14 r33 since that lie had received a
.depiitatiop from •
• that-'",hdon Missionary Society, Which had as"su"red him
po there was no .cause. ' of complaint
.ans, that
thu" against, the French "Govertuiseet.--(Hear.)
tlieriel'renth •aUthorities bad treated them' entirely -in the
the er Promised by the Convention. With, respect to.
btssreeent proceedings' of the. ,French - Admiral at
sserrite,-he had. only to say thatsthts -acts of that officer
Ifear'' NdisOffned by the -French:; Government.—(Near,
tee -an thought it right -to -state..that :this had
aetu estitirely done by the spontaneous and .voluntary
had °,- the - French.—(Hear.) . He <LOrd Aberdeen)
444 notwritten .to her Majesty's representative in. Paris,-
the not one word of remonstrance • had. been offered. by
fronsisbassador himself. For he (Lord Aberdeen) was
the fe e‘ole first convinced, that when the thing w.asknown,
svhst osi on. the part of :the Vreach
.Government of
Ives, wasg due to their own . honour, anclst9 ;justice,
Eitatsged lead to that 'result.— (wear,, hear.) Ile made this ,
eh:4ot as explicitly as ,poisible ; but he- was quite.
erecs"T'd to see that the Ministers of the King of the
sati-ne° would be assailed 'by the war party with emu-
voura of bavingsuccunibed to 'Britain.- Theswar party
(gad not fail to avail themselves of the rppcirtunity— t
svh,ttf, hear)---and ia the . same manner he thonght that
' nit Cer had been done; by :himself, and,whafever lad'
this :en done, would be set .;doWn by thepartiSans _in -
arc cone, of the French war party, ,as -abase and cow-
, • isa.i.Y, .ohniission to Franeesss(flear • hear.)
.But the
tunefeajr,t3/ was as little to be regarded' in_Frenee, as for-
to,./„It was in this. country.-s,-(Hear.) . -..
'state,: '3IIOI.IGHAM expressed .his.satisfaction at the
his s;slent of his Noble Friend. Every one who knew
parties Friend would—and he believed all men of all
as if each would—be as mucn satisfied •vyith that statement,
each individual knew. the facts or his own, ssroper -
the Personal knowledge—atear, pear)._ The effect of
Fr; f°ll and peremptory manner in which his Noble
Its ~,,". had made the statement .would be a complete
aeZ^er to the war party on-the other side of the Chan-
Ifs 21, e would not say more on-this subject, because he •
tlial-'l°llished and pleased to find'that the existence of
l•richPaarty was altogether disavowed ; and his Noble
°at --- and himself were accused of creating that party ,
°f,tsheir own imaginations---alear, hear, and iS laegh)
'tame :4°Y,cried ' Name name," whenever allusion was
.1404;:cithena. They said that he aid his Noble Friend
bop under a- delusion that any. War part' existed
Ras 7., fors the lasts three years. They said now-it
)folodlh, a creation of the imagination, and hoped it
• seksic .notsrove a 'realitylsefore the end of she. present
he returns were then ordered.- ~ • , .:.:
&The. I,' CORN-LAWS. • .
fo, sa s Earl of YARBOROUGH presented as petition
'' he ' a Place in Leicestershire, against any change in
l' n c°lU-las,
~. OTEc,
oTANT AND NATIONAL EDUCATION
~', k,ioh xr (IRELAND)..:...
'I ' '''' 4 -41 r . f NORMANBY gave notice that on
sm. quis o
• . thex„,`o' next he would present% a petition, ,wliich, al-
. latter local in ,its character,, related.to. a subject of ge-
14th,,Verest. The petition complained. of the conduct.
assi4` -uoard of Charitable Bequests .in Ireland. •In re,
• ' 414;t1°,..1),i7 certain legacies for educational purposes to
esarsc'c'ners, svho were clergyrnen of the Established
s`ge ts,''', The refusal was groandecl on the 4doption of
slfes-1, Aolsal system of education by the' -petitioners.—
!he, ti;,' He thought it his duty to. call the attention of
74ttse.-ue to this case of great .hardship,,.and he would
-v° thein the hands of VOyesnment..
Th matter
, tom -P-Sb NEW HOUSES OF- PAIILIAMENT. -
en 11 ''''ROUGHAM_ gave notiSe, thet son Monday
hokr,e would call the attention of, the House to the
Th:st,a Of the new Houses a Parliament. -s . .
1--t°llse then adjourned.. ••• • • •
me
111' HOUSE OF COMMONS, March 1.
% #S
Pi►o
iFtsittat took. the Chair at a few minutes before.
LA
. , .. ssi t;
air • • 'RAILWAYS. —• • . .
• N gi'l?i, UEATftcurz moved the second:reading of
t4l, luury Branch RailwaYßill. s , • ,-
. 14,,i1l se,,'''s WALL said that ,hes Was oppoSed. to ,this
°Sits,. sgether, and he was disporped Ws cliter, lli oppo,
14'th1,•,,,he present stage. lie Icertainly *mild oppose
44103 i",lm,l'eading, unless very 'material atterations were
tier tne 'Committee. • : ' - , ' • ,
tittA.T.,.„.r a - few w d in explanation, . from-, Sir G.
NittteClTE the" Bs ill was, read a second time; and
IVA ,
Talc Y.
be committed.
I'leobe:_ork and Searbofough Railliay Bill -was read a
'4ltie, and referred to a Committee.
Th. SEVERN NAVIGATION BILL." . .
1:'-- is 13111 was read a second„tiose, and ordered to be,
e'toltted
~,. Altili
is 4tr, RI, Ps_POLITAN CIRCULAR RAILWAY.
n,'' laso„-„441-NDISH presented. a :petition from Hairpw,
s„-'e at„,-4 °I a Project for the formation of' a railway on
7. 0,-"olia°B•Pheric , principle, to: be "Carried round' the
• I:,Soir,
It3s, Qrhas.„,- -s'OLTRT said that he thought it his duty,
}Pose 71',"an of the Standing • -Orders . Committee, to
ati 40t-oce reception of this petition. Tlin.petition.ers
tttre eot °lllPlied with the Standing Orders, and they
t e Per entitled to have theit application entertained.
ailw innssc who first took, this project. of the circular
its Tway 1,.
,1 ill fi, 'land applied for dowers to construct a rail-
iliies. the ordinary manner, and upon establiSlied Pio-
' Z°listruf,S, obsequentl they propissed that, it should be
rti'leisf 'ed 'Ton what was called. the "atmospheric
kfit,s; e:' He was unwilling to encourage such irregu-
44!leht ''',ss'ataurntle,d besides, he Us .of the projectors were
ractis Cs and the project appeared to be altogether
hi Ir. Sit,'Ali% •
4 hazd ISII said that thepetition was placed in
.'4l'a
848
h . • cl he'was ,
1.44,, equeutl e was coming into the House, an ,
e- atsbjeet Y.' not prepared to give any explanation on,
sfter •
ales
.
it7ed„ to. ultory conversation; -the petitien wits or-
'Lista), CouPon. the table,-.not not being referred to
~. ""turaittes • . -1- .• _
so„,4',d. 055.„..„
c.,. *CORN-LAWS. . • . • _
Prt;'!'S' of No'-'4OTON presented twotitions from the
..
• th_Yiet f.,.,_ rthumberland;one signed by 359 . persons,
AZ %use" Protection to agrieultare, and trusting that
4-Coro:rid, discountenance the proceedings of the
kr aw League,
tekv; WALT, , GAME-LAWS.
l'a'ne is ilk 4•CE moved that the petition from the
eslawB, , nfrew, Ayr, and. Lanark, on the subject of
It be printed with .the Votes.—Agreed to.
NI r' GLAD RAILWAYS. ' •
ti. et co STONE brought 'up the Report of the
11:1}?rt be tnr.aittee on. Railways: He moved that .the.
4 zil thPrinted with the Votes, and he trusted it would
NI e hand
,tto. 3 of Hon. , Members to-morrow.--
Oa 14-t IlitpQ
tt the the 4,0,. THE STATE TRIALS. ..
k biv fer"n of Mr. S. HERBERT, that the Order
1.11,10 I', buf,,,ine into Committee of Supply be read,
axid•j- 43's esid`-'°M.BE rose to " move for a return of
triade °he 4-e- it
s_te Frederick Bond Hughes, Charles' Rose,
akitm;b3' Thera "n, on account of any communications
ease .°ll iii -r ii '0 .Government relative to the repeal
in ' also the'and, distinguishine- the amounts paid to
kßette resi4iNd•fes °. f the several payments, specify-
copies with •
~ Perods. at -Which_ they
" anY 'lath-lotions gii,eni to tithe