The Sun.
London, England, 1828-10-29 00:00:00

LAW INTELLIGENCE.-(THIS DAY')

4TRAci

COURT OF CHANCERY.
ANTHONY V. RICHARDS
Mr. HORNE stated, his Lordship 'would. rett;tl.lolo6 rF
P :lies'd
Itiveei:ll42l;l'
this petition, in which his client had the di 1° ti E '
reRA
not to succeed yesterday, on the ground. that
kit
matters had agreed to be referred to Lord '"—thit lie asent„,°l
arbitrator. He had now to state to the Court' ~A. e 14,.. w. r7e
that was not the case, as he held in his hang the°„--el (117' e
of Lord Eldon, dated in March, which was Frol tle—e'' or
Elden C. ; he trusted, therefore, that his Prus-tifi'l opve.n cli
/ire I
that the d }
would not abide by the decision he had root* '
and would allow the matter to be reheard.
Mr. SUGfAN objected altogether to Ir. iiv'b'etig
t:l)llelineCti;:
being heard. The fact was, the case ha'
heard at some length before Lord Eldon,
not pronounced judgment uposi it when he letitrio ttPtraPlie,d,,
from office, and in this, as in many other csot4' - t Themr" exer
parties had agreed to take Lord Eldon's jud'g:en'i 1
That judgment had been given, and being 4.,111.ii I°l the
Mr. Horne's client, he now sought to h 614 tOll,,-'e e'
reviewed. This the Learned Counsel stibilit:;,‘ 1:11:,, a"
was impossible, the decision of Lord Eldon '`f't I:Ls' t(
the decision of his Lordship, not as Chancellor,' ',necessary
3 i'll'estary
as a private individual.
HIS LORDSHIP thought as the parties had 'igre,e; to ,odrder I
to. be bound by the decision of Lord Eldon' !'-'op 4 .re
private individual, he could not alter the dernislill
which he yesterday pronounced. It was quite,r_
.I,l''Llor,'i
o,44Ttt,h,r
0(f:t
how the matter stood. Lord Eldon, for the rn'l tifrPorrnoareio-u
pose of making the order regular, had dated it -fy tile
period corresponding with the time at whichlit t \''h.
heard the petition, but there could be no dcljtvi.rors (Irrlicell iadr
the character which his Lordship filled at the ' t4ts excite(
the judgment was given. , It' „.°llclon p
WEYMOUTH, IN THE MATTER OP ARCEEE, A 1,01g.'1: 0
Ililiettlfror
Isis LORDSHIP said he had read the affidavit° 6
this case, and was quite satisfied that Mr. NV rlilto t 1;1" I
had improperly taken the commission rfr.o eihert.' .4 - :"--;
rolment Office, and that tinder each eireTtmetAlP,o 44:11(en
his Lordship was of opinion that he was not 'e ,s'lre land
to come here for the purpose of obtaini tg the
ewi-ii IlitP Le''
pences of sending it down to Exeter, and --disil" ''''r to re
~ rp:itiiAite
the petition with costs.
VISES V. LAWRENCE. •
In this case the Court affirmed the decision r. „f ,or,zi.ar,
with costs. . kt„tb,.6 nd
li !,y‘tiaticn
" Our 1
it
t et at h;
'llled wii
Nd, ale
ins the
40.4vt its I
rers, 4 Mei
11,;,.T_ eesri)
.atr (firs
Pttivalars'

VICE-CHANCELLOR'S COURT.
IN PE DOT MY. ?
Mr. Rose was heard this morning against lbeiff
ition, for setting aside the sale of 'books under
Dolby's commission.
Mr. Mom? was about to follow on the wive°
when
The IrtcE-CtIANcF.noR informed him that lit"
unnecessary to add any thing to what had rod
already urged against the petition. The Lea
Gentleman however made a few nbservatistis.
The matter stands over until Mr. Montague, vi
will be engaged before the Lord Chancellor to gjii
hour, replies; but, perhaps, it will not be bas
too much to infer, from what his fallen froOlii
Viee-Chaneellor, that the petition will be dish r,!
unless Mr. Montague succeeds in alteriag
Honour's present view of the case.

(Pro;
Tttn
I:te thz
1,,..v.°Y3
t 4 "'tecing
,
add it fn.:
ge thz
' to tb
of
wha!
ieh

COURT OF KING'S BENCH.

VVEMTLING SIATC/1.—.-KENSIDT V. caar,r)-
Mr. Htmcartss stated that this 'Ras att actsii
recover a sum of 121., which the ,;eiandant, RCt
Martin Gadd, had received from the plaintiff.
ground of action was derived from titer,* eircilt,
stances.--A match was made in May, law, fa,
men to wrestle at Highgate, for the aura 01,0 e
The plaintiff staked 121. in the hands of
,the dfieo
ant, on the part of one of the wreitlers•
wrestling-match did not take place, and the plc,
applied fur his money back. The defendant rt!
mised to give it him, but had not done so, and,,
action was brought to recover it. The Lent)
Counsel added, that he was prepared to prove
the defendant had received the 121.
Lord
TENTERDEN—The money was given co
bet then.
Mr. HUTCHINS—NO, my Lord, it was not $
with the defendant, but merely placed in his li
Lord TENTERDEN—BIit it was to abide the el
of a bet.
Mr. HunitiNs—Yes, my Lord, it was SO ; bi
Lord TENTERDEN—Then I think it is not at
which I ought to try. I shall therefore discl
the record because it is on gambling. I there
discharge the Jury from giving any verdict.

4111::::1111:(414:1:111
tintractet
4411, in
iletulifn.
Conn
lit was
,turn
This ova•

(From
CLoit
%3ion
tithe t

ciileath.
tIllit14::%14?::
tll`i':lClir,l Fitt}ltltot:Lticlist:lrtWte:
ins°ao
.Fit":cfh:ir;l
he
If i i
: taleodg
0 , arl of •
the c
l64reea th
r"l'' krtiati i,
)s'; there 11
4edin
e.r, g.
r ' (Fro,

COOPER V. WAKELRY.

In this case, which was an action for libel, brol
by the celebrated surgeon, Bransby Cooper, Wilt
the defendant, for an imputation of want of ail
performing an operation in Guy's Hospital, 0
BROUGHAM now moved the Court to postpone 0
trial, which had been fixed for Monday next, 00,
ground that the defendant could not safely procr.l
to trial without the attendance of several mate
witnesses, now absent from London, and a 10'
ledge of whose residence he had not been able,
obtain. They were six medical students, who
present at the operation, and absolutely necessalir
support the plea of justification put in by his die,
Mr. SCARLETT replied, and the cause was P°
poned by the Court sine die.

BANN V. DALZIEL.

Mr. F. POLLOCK stated that this was an Betio
the plaintiff, a boot-maker, against the defendant'et
present Lord Dalziel, to recover 81/ .Id.with inter
being the sum of a judgment passed by the Coo°,
Exchequer in Ireland, in 1817, against the defend
The bill was originally for boots and shoes, and
tracted in London; but, as the defendant vi3s'A
1817, living in Ireland, the plaintiff was oblilie'frl
go there to sue him for the debt. To that actiono,
put in a plea of infancy, which was met by a replit‘(
tion that the goods were necessary, and the defend
()(
then submitted for a verdict. From that time, 11,,
ever, the plaintiff had never been able either to jl
tain the amount of the judgment or to find the. ,;;
fendant. Under these circumstances, the pl3''
now sought to recover the sem and interest the tic
The record of the judgment was then put ill
proved.
Mr. RICHARDS, for the defendant, contended,
interest was not recoverable upon the decision o.oe
Irish Court, as they must be considered as
courts to the courts in this country, where inref,
was not recoverable on a judgment. He
call several of the most respectable persona, 14,
would prove that the defendant was living the greio'
part of the time in London, and was in the 01
daily habit of walking past the plaintiff's door fl
Bond-street. The defendant had paid the 2101.
of the original debt into court.
Lord TENTERDEN decided that interest W
coverable on the judgment of an Irish Court,
ed
cause had been lately tried in the Common ri f'
when interest was allowed to the judgment °
Scotch Court. 1,1.
rot,

Mr. RICHARDS called La.:lv Carmath, the -
and Colonel Brown, thu uncle, for the defein,
who proved the fact of his living pulilicly, as atfit.tt
Mr. F. Pori.ocE replied that it eras a pi 9c,(
defendant did not walk into the plaintiff's
and pay the bill, in one of his perambulations. r
Lord TEN TERDEN summed up, and the JOY!
turned a verdict for the plaintiff---Damages'32l'
interest, in addition to the sum paid into Court,

TILE MARKETS.—(THIS DAY.)•
CORN EXCHANGE.
The supplies of Flour and Irish Oats this Week
good, of other articles the quantity is moderate. The
Parcels of Wheat fully maintain the terms of Monday,
very little fine remains for sale. Barley is unalten
value, but meets a dull sale. Beans and Pease do not
buyers so readily as of late. There is not much doin
tke Oat trade try-day, and Monday's prices are with
culty obtained. Flour remains as last reported.

A RIQVA LS.
I Wheat. I Parley. Oats. Fla
F.nglish
Irish -
Foreign

Frida
to pr,

Sir WILLIA:4 FOR ES expired at his h'
in George-street, yt:stvrduy moroin:t.—Edinburylt
inp ?LW, Oct.