The Sun.
London, England, 1845-01-27 00:00:00

58 and 76, total 134 ; Marylebone 80 and 52, total 132
—won by three wickets.
Nine Gentlemen and Two Players of Sussex,
and Nine Gentlemen and Two Players of Hants, at
Brighton ; won by Sussex, 141 and 41, total 182 ;
llants 100 and 81, total 181—won by 10 wickets.
17. Gentlemen of Kent and Gentlemen of England,
at Lord's ; won by England, 63 and 138, total 201 ;
Kent 116 and 82, total 198 —won by five wickets.
24. Marylebone Club and Ground and West of
England (with four Players of England), at Lord's ;
won by Marylebone, 81 and 69, total 150 ; West of
England 97 and 52, total 149—won by two wickets.
27. Marylebone and University of Oxford Return
Match, at Lord's ; won by Oxford, 77 and 82, total
159 ; Marylebone 32 and 51, total 83.
Kent and Sussex, at Canterbury ; won by
Sussex, 46 and 153, total 199 ; Kent 90 and 107,
total 197—won by one wicket.
July I.—Kent and England, at Lord's ; won by
Kent 117 and 55, total 172 ; England 59 and 97,
total 156.

8. Marylebone Club and Ground and Hampshire
(with Fuller Pilch and Good), at Lord's ; won by
Marylebone 118 and 175, total 293 ; Hants 90 and 57,
total 147.

11. Kent and Sussex Return Match at Brighton ;
won by Kent 147 and 176, total 323; Sussex 215 and
99, total 314.
15. Marylebone Club and Ground (with Fuller
Pilch) and Northern Counties (with A. Mynn), at
Lord's; won by Marylebone 97 and 76, total 173;
Northern Counties 105 and 55, total 160.

18. Marylebone Club (with Lillywhite and Hillyer)
and Audley End (with Fenner, Ringwood, and Dean),
at Audley End; won by Marylebone 74 and 143,

total 217; Audley End 5; and 156, total 212.
22. Marylebone Club and Ground (with Wenman)
and the County of Sussex, at Lord's; won by Sussex
154; Marylebone 50 and 92, total 142—won by one

innings and 12 runs.
25. Marylebone Club and Ground and County of
Norfolk (with F. Pilch), at Lord's; won by Norfolk
69 and 111, total 170 ; Marylebone 79 and 71,
total 150.
29. Gentlemen and Players, at Lord's ; won by
Players 130 and 141, total 271 ; Gentlemen 128 and
105, t0ta1.233:

Nottingham and Sheffield, at Sheffield ; won by
Nottingham 70 and 103, total 173 ; Sheffield 77 and
95, total 172.
August s.—Marylebone Club and Ground and
West of England (with four Players of England)
Return Match, at Lansdowne ; won by West of
England 71 and 110, total 182; Marylebone 61 and
40, total 101.
Gentlemen of Sussex and South Hants, at
Southampton ; won by Sussex 140; South Hants 46
and 57, total 103—won by one innings and 37 runs.
8. Marylebone Club and Ground and County of
Herts, at Redbourn ; won by Marylebone 82 and 51,
total 133 ; Ilerts 85 and 47, total 132—won by six
wickets.

13. Kent and England Return Match, at Canter-
bury ; won by England 96 and 87, total 183 ; Kent
94 and 37, total 131.
16, Gentlemen of Kent and Gentlemen of England
Return Match, at Canterbury; Kent 107 and 64,
total 171 ; England 119 and 25, total 144, with four
wickets to go down—drawn by mutual consent.
19. Marylebone Club and Ground and Sussex Re-
turn Match, at Brighton ; won by Sussex 171 and
287, total 458 ; Marylebone 153 and 219, total 372.
22. Marylebone Club and Ground and Petworth
Cipb and Ground, at Petworth; won by Petworth 77
and 87, total 164; Marylebone 47 and 116, total 163
—won by four wickets.
26. Marylebone Club and Ground and Northern
Counties Return Match, at Leicester ; won by
Northern Counties 126 ; Marylebone 71 and 52, total
123—won by one innings and three runs.
27. Tunbridge and Tunbridge Wells, at Tunbridge;
won by Tunbridge 151 ; Tunbridge Wells, 53 and 66,
total 119—won by one innings and 32 runs.
29. Marylebone Club and Ground and South Hants
Club and Ground Return Match, at Southampton ;
won by South Hants 107 and 85, total 192 ; Mary-
lebone 143 and 45, total 188—won by five wickets.
September s.—Marylebone Club and Ground and
County of Norfolk (with F. Pilch) Return Match, at
Swaffham ; won by Norfolk 45 and 8, total 53.
7. Oxonians and Brighton, at Brighton ; won by
Oxonians 120 and 61, total 181 ; Brighton 53 and 51,
total 104.
9. Six Gentlemen of Nottingham and Five Players
of England, and Eleven Players of Nottingham, at
Nottingham ; won by Gentlemen, &c., 170 and 55,
total 225 ; Players 123 and 90, total 213.
12. Married and Single of England, for the benefit
of the Players, at Tunbridge Wells; won by Married
134 and 101, total 235 ; Single 82 and 144, total 226.
18. Etonians and Brighton, at Brighton ; won by
1 the Etonians 216 ; Brighton 75 and 46, total 121—
won by one innings and 95 runs.

CHILD FOUND IN PEMBROKE COLLEGE GARDEN,
CAMBRIDGE.—On Thursday evening, at six o'clock, an
inquest was holden before Mr. Cooper, at the Bell Inn,
Butolph-lane, on the body of an infant found in the
garden of Pembroke College. The following evidence
was advanced:—James Charles—l am gardener to
Pembroke College. On Monday morning about
eight o'clock, I found the child at the end of the college
garden, next to the Tennis Court-road, wrapped in
a white petticoat and pinner ; it was lying about a yard
from the wall. I had not been to that part of the garden
since the Tuesday or Wednesday preceding. I went to
that part of the garden in consequence of dreams which
I had on Saturday and Sunday night. I dreamt twice
on Saturday night, and once on Sunday night, that I saw
a female throw a child over the college garden. I dreamt I
was in the Tennis Court-road, and that she was there also.
A surgeon who examined the body gave it as his opi-
nion that the child had been born alive. Mr. R.
Fergusson, a Fellow of Pembroke College :—I
was in the Fellows' garden on Sunday last, with Mr.
Stokes, who is also a Fellow of the College. I did
not see a bundle in white lying there. I think if there
had been we must have seen it, but I did not go close
to the spot where I am informed the child was found ;
I was within about fifteen yards of that spot. I was iu
the garden from half-past one till two. The jury re-
turned a verdict to the effect that the child was born
alive, but there was no evidence to show hew It came by
its death, or how it was placed where it was found.—
Abridged fromithe Cambridge Chronicle.
COMMITTAL OF Two YOUNG FARMERS FOR
POACHING.—On Friday last, the 17th instant, Thomas
and Henry Cumberland, farmers, living near Newtown,
Linford, were charged at the County Office, Leicester,
before T. Pares and I. Hodgson, Esqs., with night poach-
ing in the preserves of the Earl of Stamford, on Thursday
night. Jo:eph Harrison, a watcher, said—l was
lying in Blake Hay Wood last night, about half-pest,
seven o'clock, when I heard somebody down in the
wood for some time. They came nearer to me. I lay
down, and two men, whom I knew to be defendants,
passed me. I went and fetched Brewton and Greasley,
and came ba ek with them in half an hour, when I
heard more than one shot from an air gun. De-
fendants came up by us and did not see us. We let
them pass, and then seized them and tcok them
to Linford, whre we searched them, and found on
Henry the key and pump of an air-gun. John
Branston, a keeper, said that after one of the air-gun
shots, a pheasant flew past. Defendants strug
glad and got away, after being first taken. At Beck's
house (where they were searched) Thomas said he was,
not the shooter, Henry was. James Beck said,
" When at my home, defendant Thomas wished Har-
rison t') go out, as he (defendant) had something to
say to me. Harrison went out, and left me and
Thomas alone. Thomas then asked me to unbotton his
coat, as his arm was hurt. I did so, and found under
it the air-gun now produced. He wished me to lay it
away. .1 did so. It was then loaded with ball."
The defendant Thomas said to the bench that he be-
lieved the truth had been told, with two or three trifling
exceptions. He had never been in the wood, and never
struck any one. His brother Henry said that he was in
the wood, and had shot at some pigeons, when, as he was
going home peaceably, Branston and the others came on
them, and beat them unmercifully. The defendants were
sentenced, Henry to three months' hard labour, and
Thomas to two months—Leicester Chronicle.

HOUNDS ON A RAILWAY.-011 Wednesday last
the hounds of Lord Gifford, in Gloucestershire, which
had met in the morning, at Minety Pond, were placed
in the utmost jeopardy between Cirencester and Swin-
don. The fox had crossed the railway, and the hounds
had come to a check upon the very rails, when the cry of
a train ! a train I" that made every one shudder, was
heard, and a passenger train seen to be, as it were, bear-
ing down upon the pack with its usual velocity. The
alarm whistle gave its wild scream to show that the en•
Sine driver was aware of what was inevitable, but it was
evident that, if the hounds could not be extricated by
removal, the pace of the train could not be slacked to
preserve them In an instant one of the whips was upon
the line, and by the greatest effort the hounds were pre-
served, though the last of the pack that quitted the rail
was so near one of the wheels of the engine, that for a
time it was supposed to have been destroyed.—/Vorth-
aaepton Herald.
We had hoped that the evil spirit of incendiarism
was laid in this district by the numerous detections and
convictions which have taken place, but we regret
to have to announce two more fires in the vicinity
of this town. On Saturday night, between twelve
and one o'clock, the premises of Mr. Harrison, of
Tirnwarth, were discovered to be on fire, and
notwithstanding the most praiseworthy exertions, two
barns, two stables, a granary, cow-house with three
cows and a calf, and from 200 to 300 coombs of corn,
chiefly barley, were destroyed. One barn and the
dwelling house, which were in considerable danger
were preserved by covering the former with blankets
and pulling down a part of a building adjoining
to the latter. Mr. Harrison is amply protected by
insurance ; but the alarm to his family, and to one in
a delicate state of health, was very distressng, and makes
the character of the act the more diabolical. The build-
ings, belonging to the Rev. E. R. Benyon, were also in-
sured. On Sunday night a stack of beans on the lands
of Mr. Gapp, of Walsbam, standing alone, was destroyed
by fire.—Bury Post.

FLUCTUATIONS IN THE PRICE OF RAILWAY SHARES.
—From the share-table recently issued by Mr. Wat-
son, of Glasgow, some curious particulars of fluctua-
tions in the prices of shares may be gathered. Thus
on the Bth of January, 1838, the shares of the Grea,