The Sun.
London, England, 1821-11-22 00:00:00

IMPERIAL CLOTH FOR SHIRTING, &c.
By his Majesty's Letters Patent. •

• - •
Ne contenent pas de tin ma's en poss6dent les :Tremens.
THE NOBILITY, FAMILIES, and MER-
CHANTS, are respectfully informed, the above de-
sirable Cloth for the East. and West Indies, as well as the
cold climates, for its bealthfnlness to wear at sea, fur Youth
at school, and fur a variety of family purposes, for its pecu
liar economy, is regularly sold, Wholesale, for Exportation,
and by the single piece, at IS(1.-2s.-2s. 6d.-3s.—and Ss. 6d.
per yard, stamped, MILLARD'S PATENVI"WINE CLOTH,
at their Warehouse, No. 16, CH EAPSIDE, and no where
else whatever. The Pieces for Sheeting coatain from two
to four pair,- adaptod for winter wear, the cold climates, and
for travelling. Families in the country, on sending their
orders (by post) will have them executed as if present, and
the greatest variety of Foreign and British Goods are cow-
stantly ou safe.

X 5,000 CEIVI AIN, with the CHANCE of OTHER CAN-
. TALS. RISK -only 40-SHILLINGS, on the 11th DE
CEMBER,

CA RRO I,h, the CONTRACTOR, begs
to inform the Public, that all Purchasers between the
20th of November and I lth of December, will he allowed to
return their Tickets or Shares after taking the Chance of the
Next Day, when a Prize of .X 5,000 at least is sure to he
drawn, and nearly the whole of the Money will be given
-back, by which the risk.of. loss is reduced to the following
trifling sums, viz. :
• Whole Ticket -Pi 0 0
Half 1 5 0
Quarter
0. 7 6
Sixteenth 0 4 0
The Wheel is very Rich, and contains, •
Prize of
3
£2,000
£l.OOO
£5OO
3
4 • £2OO -
Besides other Prizes of tool. 501. &c. &c.
AND NOT TWO BLANKS TO A PRIZE! •
All to he Drawn in Two Days, 11th and 20th December.
Tickets and Shares are Selling-at CARROLL'S Fortunate
Offices, 19, CORNH ILL, and 26, OXFORD STREET, lihere
Schemes, with full Particulars, arc delivered gratis.
No. 11,48 G, a Prize of (30,000 Money, drawn on Tues-
day, November 20, was Sold in Shares by CARROLL.

LAW INTELLIGENC&

COURT OF CHANCERY, Nov. 21.

THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL V. THE SKINNERS' COMPANY.
Mr. HORNE followed Mr. Trowle in opposition to the appeal
in this case. He said, that after all that had been already said
upon the subject, he should strictly confine himself to the sub-
stantial facts of the question before the Court, and deal with
that question as briefly as possible. He considered the main
point at issue to be, whether or not certain lands in the parish
of St. Pancras, originally purchased by Sir Andrew Judd from
two parties named Gates and Thorowgood, were vested in the
Skinners' Company for the benefit of the Tunbridge School.—
He should contend that they were vested for that-exclusive
p The LORD CHANCELLOR. said he would wish Mr. Horne to
consider, first, whether he thought the. Vice Chancellor right in
saying that the will of Judd had nothing to do with the ques-
tion. Suppose, that after the passing of the 14th-of Elizabeth,
all property devised to the Skinners' Company beyond that
purchased from Gates and Thorowgood had been swallowed up
by an earthquake, and the rent of the Pancras estates had in-
creased above 301. a-year, might not the Attorney-General have
filed an information on behalf of the ahnsmen provided for by
the will of Judd, and contended that notwithstanding the pri-
vate Acts of Parliament which declared the estates to belong to
the school exclusively, yet the will in question ought to be con-
sidered as a declaration of trust, and therefore the ahnsmen were
entitled to 'their provision of :31. a-year out-of the rents, after
they had exceeded the value of 301. annually ?
Mr. Hon xi: subthitted with great deference to his Lordship,
that the will -might be put wholly out of the question in this
case ;_ but if the Court should not be of that opinion, he
would maintain that the Company ought still to be considered
only as trustees for the benefit of the school. Ile did not
think that Mr. Sugden's argument in favour of the present
distribution of the funds called for any detailed reply on his
part. UpOn this point the principle advanced by his Learned
Friend was that of long usage ; there were, however, instru-
ments in existence which would enable his Lordship to de-
cide the question; and he would submit that when a title
was made evident by documents, usage could not prevail in
contravention. The Learned. Counsel then referred to the
charter granted by Edward VI. to Sir Andrew Judd, from
which it appeared that Judd, as trustee, was peimitted to
held lands for the exclusive benefit of the school, and after his

117 r. HEALD was then heard in reply.
Mr. SHADVELL said that if the funds of the ,i,chool should
be increased by the decision of the Court, the Schoolmaster had
aright to expect an increase of salary, and he appeared on his-
behalf to intimate his intention to, apply fbr it.
The LORD CHANCELLOR said that being now in possession
of most of the facts of the case, he should give judgment upon
it on his coming into Court to-morrow morning,--The Court
rose at three o'clock.

VICE-CHANCELLOR'S COURT, Nov. 21.
Ex parte.SHAW in re EDWARD AND GUMS.
Mr. HORNE applied to his Honour in this case in the fol.
lowing circumstances :—There were affidavits filed in this case
from another petition of Grimstcad and Carroll. 'That petition
the Lord Chancellor agreed to hear to-morrow. Ile (Mr.
Horne) meant to apply to the Lord Chancellor to hear the pe-
titions of his clients (Shaw and others) before their petition.
This he felt it necessary to mention to his Honour, as he was
to be applied. to onlFriday to fix a day for hearing the case.
Mr. MART had no objectil:n ; and his HONOUR assented.

COURT OF KING'S BENCH, Nov. 2.1.

THE KING V. JACKSON AND OTHERS.

This, it will be recollected,. was an indictment against the
defendants, respectable persons, named Jacksons, father • and
son, and Jervis, for an alloged conspiracy to sue out a com-
mission of Bankrupt against Jackson, Jun. and prove fictitious
debts,to enable the other defendants to obtain the choice of as-
signees, and so grant him. his certificate, thereby intending to
defraud a Mr. Fox, late a surgeon and apothecary, to whom
the Bankrupt was indebted for part of the purchase-money of a
share in his business. At the trial before the Chief Justice at
the Middlesex Sittings after last Term, the Jury found the de-
fendants guilty.
The SOLICITOR-GENERAL, in behalf of the defendants,
now moved for a rule to show causa why the verdict for the
Crown should not be set aside, and a new trial 4:tanted, on the
ground that the defendants were now in possession of evidence,
which they could not obtain previous to the last trial, tending
to exculpate them from any criminal intention, by shewing
that Jadcson; the son, was in fact indebted to his father in the
full amount pro-.7ed before the Commissioners.
The COURT, after hearing the circumstances of the case
fully stated, and the fresh matter now adduced, were of opinion
that the case ought toundergo further inquiry, and therefore
granted a rule Nisi.

THE KING V. CHARLES BAKER.
Mr. JERVIS prayed the judgment of the • Court on this
defendant, who• was convicted at the last. Assizes for the county
of Oxford, before Mr. Baron Garrow, of a most atrocious
offence.

Mr. Justice BATLEY (the Chief Justice being absent) in con-
currence with the other Judges, issued an order that no person
shoil take notes of the particulars of the case with a view to
publication in the Ncwspapers,on pain of the displeasure of the
Court. His Lordship said he was induced to make this order
in consequence of the suggestion of Mr. Justice Best.
The case was of a nature so diabolical, that good taste as well
as.a regard for public decency, must induce every respectable
Journalist to abstain from entering into its details, without re.
gard to any imprimatur to which the publication of the pro-
ceedings of a Court of Justice might be subjected. •
Mr. G. CROSS, who conducted the defence on the trial,
though he was now without any instructions, stated that he
had submitted an objection to the Learned Judge at the trial,
as to the form of the indictment, which the Learned Judge
seemed inclined to entertain as of considerable validity.—
The Learned Judge also had summed up strongly for an ac-
quittal, as to that part of the case_ which formed its greatest
feature of enormity. .
The COURT, upon this suggestion, desired that the case might
stand .over until to-morrow, in order that some communica-
tion might be made with ie Learned Judge who presided at
the trial.