The Sun.
London, England, 1828-08-16 00:00:00

DAY.

.N.W,

1, for St'
ica ; the
Childe

—Arrived
tiled the
inswick•
, Hagur,

Via.
es, Pip'

hence to
l's Island
shipping,

homy of
;day..

►s Chive'
uri(
pieces.

D

•chill, the
d mown'.
)s and her
g. Mrs.
the case
sorry than
PY, with
whenever
ever, that
c to serve
stisnnent,

7cular to
ding ths
°tun 13o•
ral Mow

the re'
le Gentle'
use is fill,
re of Law
ill be Lor
ake placer
would be
-Mornifig

RICIAIO
Battalio
ViutNor t°
Ireland 01
the Cold'
Knight':
;he King 4
Regibnet,!
he Kingll
,carters

RENT;
respecte
tiou frol
own, 10

ronausicr
)t him S'
getl to the,
ley shoal
leir roes°'
brat Ives;
Dr IrelBo'
Cath°-

awn for
ch Will be
;pected
:he Nob
l'
a grest
,nd neigh

Drder 01
which tbe
led row
cerenic a

he Pr°-
lost e%tev
Frain fr‘''''
• er3l
:He sev-,,,
ith.
ome i 4 61;
t is tiote'"
*hole
ose Pen°
lb'.
most e 3.
ost f -
I is c°ln:
of Cou
he vie's'
ace of ti';
actors 01"(
foque
finely
are. voce
s
'
are °Cr

• di,
arm
owing
.eadth
runt.
IfVf
of five °r
ner to put
will Fre-
, r
that egill
rarts,
at laticio*
r, such
of bar"
; the re-

ortsm en
rie moors,
ouie were
ed of in II
ve 10504
Y be;
vain, we

ly fine.'

„), the
his artifie
here, an
d
r'd ,ise*".”

g /13311'
,wall, 0°
he prowl"
ow brithe
bore,
vas
attentir

zE)
Lad bef,
from
ate of °,
1
•SapPOlo
11d riSeef,
emblea
k Of,
,t 1 the
!')
ou tot'

/
[..Ertg'oce
ppearatitiy
21)13.,,ar!cste,
d,
liars"( b!`
to biu'aid
itior'' 141,
Da
lg psiboo
the oe
Fatter' oafrd
c e
d
j rettio,s
Yea th'l'
'I
,e'd
,e
that J

• , .
SUMMER ASSIZE INTELLIGENCE.
MAIDSTONE, AUGUST 14.
This RPX V. FYBUS.
was an indictment at the instance of Sir
John Brown, the superintendent of the Maidstone
t
arracks, for an alleged nuisance in the making and
11'141g of large clamps of bricks in a field imme-
(llately in the rear of the barracks, and whereby it
‘9" averred considerable annoyance were occasioned
to the soldiers stationed there.
No sooner was the case called on than it was an-
"%lced that the parties had entered into an arrange-
,
-..• upon tnese terms the prosecutors agreed to
qfir no evidence for the prosecution, and a verdict
-/P4 accordingly taken by consent for the defendant.

MILGATE V. KELLEY AND COOKING.
This was an action to recover damages for an
ille-
gal distraint.
Verdict for the plaintiff—Damages 20/.
JEFFREYS V. WICKHAM.
This was an action to recoverl,lls/., alleged to have
414 improperly paid to the defendant.
r. The plaintiff sued as the representative of the
'orporation of Chatham. The defendant was one
the guardians of the poor of a parish in Chatham.
Plaintiff nonsuited.
thilliana Johnson and Christopher Storey were
tukrged with stealing a pair of candlesticks, the pro-
ktty of William Lawes, of Northfleet.—Guilty.
Being old offenders, they were sentenced to seven
lira' transportation.
In our paper of Thursday, we gave an account of
the trial and conviction of John Burgess, for receiv-
41'g a stolen hore in 1826. As the circumstances
*hich led to his apprehension are rather curious, arid
as hey are calculated to effect some moral good,
‘h4 Rive them insertion. It appears that a notorious
01e-dealer, named Cutts, has recently been con-
victed and sentenced to transportation for three se-
i;!tal terms of 14 years, for receiving stolen horses.
irl,tling his own case hopeless, he hit upon the ex.
p
11:14,1ent of writing circulars to various persons whom
clad been instrumental in robbing, offering them
:,,try information, on payment of a certain sum
'4ortioned to the value of the horse to be reco-
red. Numbers gladly availed themselves of the
u st'/Iv, and the result has been, besides the recovery
4veral horses, the apprehension and conviction of
urgess.

WELLS, AUG. 13.
Richard Blackmore, a labourer, aged 33, was in-
'eted for having, on the 2d of June last, at Bath,
C-atnally known and abused Mary Williams, an infant
etWeen four and five years old. It was proved
hgat the poor infant had suffered the most shocking
Jury.
The Jury found the prisoner " Guilty," and
i :qr. Justice PARK sentenced him to two years'
rnPrisonment, and hard labour.
„ ,The prisoner had not been indicted capitally, but
for the assault, with intent, which had been
ii°4lY a misdemeanour before the Act of Lord Lans-
r4vne, which came into effect on the Ist of July
o t. By this Act, the attempt to commit is placed
the same footing as the actual perpetration of the
offence
I' both acts being capital crimes. His Lord-
P, n passing sentence on the prisoner, said that
" should have undoubtedly left him for execution if
the Offence had been committed 30 days later.
George Edwards and Charles liellier were toge-
ther indicted for having, on the 19th of May last,
assaulted Joseph Weeks the younger, put him in
noddy fear, and extorted from him 6/., by a threat
of accusing him with having committed an unnatu-
ral offence.

Mr. Rouelts, for the prosecution, stated that the
prosecutor was a young man of rather a simple
Judgtnent, the son of a farmer residing at Bisport.
On the 10th of May, a man named Bellamy called
en the prosecutor's father, and told him that a per-
son named Charles Hellier had stated that he (Hel-
lier)had caught the prosecutor in the act of commit-
ting an offence against nature. The father commu-
nicated this to his son on the following day, and the
latter immediately went in search of the person who
had given currency to the charge. It was after this
that the offence was committed which was the
ground of the present indictment, and which was
detailed in the evidence of the following witness.
Bellamy, the person alluded to then came into
the box. It is impossible to conceive a more dis-
Osting or a more horrible appearance than his coun-
tenance presented. In addition to a terrible distor-
tion of features, he showed the most reckless fero-
6tY, and was moreover deeply intoxicated. On en-
tering the box, he nodded at the prisoners with a
'arivage jollity which excited a feeling of horror in the
"mt. As soon as he had been sworn, he proceed-
ed to run on into a confusion of most disgusting de-
tails and conversations between him and the pri-
soners, of which the object was to make up a charge
N'ainst the prosecutor of having committed a most
horrible offence, in order that they might extort from
(411 20/, which they might divide between them.
The witness avowed, that he was himself the prin.
viPal director of the proceedings, and that he had
arranged what was necessary to be sworn, Charles
Hellier undertaking to swear againt the prosecutor
any thing which the witness' might dictate. The
itness deposed to most of the facts already
4t4ted by the prosecutor and his father, and
4144 other facts which showed (if truly
stated) that the transaction was of a deeper
(IYe than it had ever been represented by the other
Witnesses. He said that the two prisoners, when
theti prosecutor called on them, told him that if he
not give them 6/., his life was not worth a
penny; that he cried bitterly, and protested his in-
;?eence, and that the prisoners cried out upon him,
:at his innocence would not save him : that they
ould swear against him is such a manner as would
th'l him beyond all chance of escaping, and that
,4eLY would state such a variety of minute and parti-
L4r facts as would hang the prosecutor, "as sure
tv"od hung apples." When the Cl. had been given
,Weeks to Edwards and Bellamy, Charles Hellier
-lated on having 2/. 10s. for his share, as he had
gertaken "to swear blank that he caught Joe
tit."ks in the natural fact." The rest of the mo-
spent by the witness and the other prisoner.
The Learned JUDGE having summed up the evi-
-444, the Jury found the prisoner Edwards Guilty
1 4 Principal, an • d us an accessory before the
tt,t
The sentence was deferred.
ii"." itosEaT AND JOHN LYE AND grams.
hrte 'lli was an action to recover damages for a false
4e`.l st arid imprisonment
hanwhdsich the plaintiff had suf-
..,
at the de.
A verdict was taken for the glaintiff—Damages 10/.
) •

CARLISLE, Ana. 12.
ll:the commission was opaned here yesterday, and
tl:thusitiess commenced to-day. There were but
pc,, prisoners for trial, and their cases were all dis-
eir- of by Mr. Justice BAYLEY in about three
vii 2. There were twenty causes entered on the
kot eof the Court, half of K. were tried this
''lng by Mr. Baron Huu.ocK h.
'4)l'OE, nEm. THOMPSON, V. OSTLE AND WIFE.
efiver4 Was an action of ejectment, brought to w-
het., certain premises situate at Maryport, in Cum-
44t!'
diet °
de
4 short consultation, found a ver-
r the defendant.

AUGUST 13.
This RAvviaNcs V. JACKSON AND ANOTHER.
hneerY
C 'I'S
WU an issue directed by the Court of
a
to try whether ra certain paper writing,
11.1)°"'"g to by tie will of John Jackson, was a
vti.lid
will. _
l'ilejury found a verdict for the defendants.

This
GLOUCESTER, Alio. 14. '
iq day, shortly before one o'clock, after attend-
triß divine service at the cathedral, Mr. Justice
4,44'elee and Mr. Baron Vaughan proceeded to their
if lieetire Courts. Mr. Justice Gaselee presided on
l
Civil Side, and Mr. Baron Vaughan took his
.c4l on the Crown Side, and proceeded to address
Q.411c1 Jury, tlecialint that A was with SiRCVN