The Sun.
London, England, 1819-07-19 00:00:00

PROVINCIAL JOURNALS.

Aq :"hose are really alanning times, and as many
Seditious Presses arc at work to pollute the minds
of the lower orders, it is very gratifying to find
that 'there are two Loyal Journals in a place where
Incendiaries have been at work, and where they
have long been incited by a Jacobinical Compe-
-1 itnr. The Leeds Intelligencer and The Leeds In-
dependent are chiefly rivals in their zeal to diTuse

right principles, and to exhort the people to din-
Bence and tranctnillity.Thetollo«•ing article we take
from the latter of these Loyal Papers, and hope,
under onr established depArtment of PRovisclat.
ioIENALS, to be able to select similar proofs of
good sense and patriotism from many other parts
,olitite Empire :--
fFrom " The lecol., ludcpcn.l•ent,'' July 15.)

I' That a crisis (and that a very dangerous one)
is rapidly approaching, cannot now f(mr a moment
be doubte►l. It is therefore high time for all
who with to preserve the Country from blood-
shed—lrvin ;%narchy or despotism—to form a NA=7
5-totc,tt, tiNtoN, fort he preservation of the Con.
stituti,m, from the designs of that projected "Nay
ional Union" svnose object is to be its over,
throw.

" It is our sincere opinion, that the country is
in a state of imminent peril. From the Resolntions
adopted at Manchester, it will be seen that
pikes and other WeapOnsr'hive been prepared;
and that divisions of men are in %raining. The
Chairman of the Meeting at lim nsley, on Mon.
tl..y last, tells us, a little more plainly than most
0: his cotidjUtors, that it will be seen which is the
stronger party " in a very few weeks."
Manchester, always forward in declaring its
sound adherence to the Constitution, has again
set an example of loyalty, which, we have no
%Inubt, will he speedily adopted by most of the
large towns in the kingdom.. The subjoined Re-
solutions and Declaration are signed by the Ma-
gistrates, Boroughreeves, Constables, Church-
wardens, and upwards of twelve hundred of the
most respectable inhabitants of Manchester and
Salford*: In addition to that of this public do=
cement; we haVe private information that the Ma.'
gistrates were taking active measures for the
swearing in of a Large body of special constables,
and adoptinz other precautions for securing the
public tranquillity and safety. -
" very well, so far as it goes, and is
worthy of general imitation. But it will not clip
to rely o►n mere Declarations, or even on, Special
Constables, when the hour of real danger shall
arrive. Even the Printer of The Mercury, in this
town, plainly avows his belief, that, if the pre-
sent proceedings, of the Reformers be persisted
in, they " will inevitably lead to one of twO
et ils—a Military despotism,L or a revolution."
"%When any one ventured to Vold this language,
during the former agitation which the schemes of
the-Reformers excited, be was designated by Mr.
Baines as an alarmist, and as one who endeavour-
ed to intimidate the people into the surrender of
their liberties. We are glad that -he himself,
however, at length sees the extremely dangerous
tendency of the inflatiimatory language which has
been addressed to the multitude; and the frank
and explicit manner in which he continues to
avow his sentiments, we hope will have an effect
as beneficial upon his friends, as it is truly ho-
pourable to himself.
The danger being detected and acknowledg-
ed, what must be done to avert the evils with
which we are threatened ? The existing military

force is amply sufficient for the defence of the
Government, and for the ultimate security
- of the Constitution ; but it is impossible that it-
can be so situated and employed, as in all cases
to prevent local tumult, and occasional blood-
shed. Any body of men who should dare to 'aP.;
pear in arms as an organized insurrectionary army,
there, can be no doubt would be speedily dispersed
or exterminated ; but it is not so easy toliave the
. peaceable inhabitants of any 'particular to'Wti' or
distriCt'froin the sudden barbarities' of-IntitulluOtis:
bands, who might appearlitit perpetraiehthqir.
mischief, and might separate before the military,
Tower could be brought against them:'
" 'The Nona, therefore, must rely 'nprin
TI-lEMSELVES for 'the" protection of dial,' 'lr+.
and *pi:Operty. This they' Cadd 'o- in only .0.40
:• ''witYs, by forthing numerous bodies-of Special Con-
- stables; under the'direCtiOn•of the'L'ocal
-Magi -
' traCy',' or by becoming VOLUNTEERS;
11p-
derthe Government. If any:political' tumults be
attempted, we may rest assured -that the actors
in them will be too- numerous to. be resisted by
ariy number of constables who' can be formed to
oppoie the ii; and on an armed Mb-niter
force only, therefore, that the country can depe4d
with the-certainty of safety. We are aware, that
• much difficulty• has been found in the- forniation
of corps of ioltinteera, frbiri that class of persons
who alone/can be safely entrusted with -aims at
the present juncture. This, we believe, has prin-
cipally arisen froth a feeling of repugnance, which
the gentlemen of any particular plaCe perhaps
' naturally entertain, at serving under officers who
are their neighbourr,•• and in ordinary life their
• companions. 'Phis sqtieamishness, however; ought
:not longer to be indulged. The timeseems to
' have 'arrived,. when men who have any-thing to
defend, !mist • hegin Berionsty, to think of -taking
effectual measures fur 'their own preservation.,--
And who is there to defend theni -but-them.
selves? Everylhing is at stake. Their propertyr--
thiir fire-sides —their' families their" otkn.
liberty anti lives-the altar their relighin,
and the graVes of their forefathers—are "equally
in danger of being-SubjeCted. to 'the unhallowed
devastations of aticluded and maddened multitude.
They must ARM, therefore,' not -merely for the
viudiCation of their privileges as BritOrts.,- but for
th7eprotection of every thing dear to them as men,
as hiishrids, and fathers', ' and Christians.
" . have had conversations with- some re-
6pectable parties in Leeds on this • subject ; !and
we believe that a very numerous and respectable.
- volunteer force might immediately be raised--

These ilesulutione, Ac. itce. hats beeu twice advarcued
i»aTUX SUN.

panic-OW yof l'z'oot ~.: OT yeOffiatini
cavalry, in the whole of this part of the kingdom,
is already perhaps sufficiently numerous. How-
ever, it is of little consequence whether the
ditional bodies be composed of infantry or cavalry,
The main point to be kept in view is, that the
formation of new corps is absolutely necessary,
and that they ought to be in a state of equip.;
merit before the conclusion of harvest. To re-
move any unpleasant feeling as to whether parti,
eular gentlemen should act as officers or privates,
-why not officer the new corps entirely with Halt-
pay Officers of the Line. This would at once
remove every objectionable feeling of delicacy
which may exist, and would besides employ a
met itoriout class of men who have gallantly serv-
ed their country abroad, and whose generous
spirits are now rusting in idleness—many of them,
alas ! in poverty and idleness combined, The
most respectable man in the country need not be
ashamed to serve as a private, with his friends
and companions,. in a patriolic band; officered by
the heroes who have crushed our foreign enemies,
and who, no doubt, would be equally ready to
shed their' blood in defence of our domestic
11 peace.

LAW INTELLIGENCE.

COURT OF CHANCERX, JULY 11. ,

A SINGULAR CASE.

3EARJINSON U. SISARJINSOIsh

Mr. HART stated, that this was an application
on the part of the Rev. Mr. Searjinson, the brother
(it the late Colonel Seatjinson, praying that his
Lorthhip would suspend the allowance of 3001..
a year for the maintenance of Miss Searjinson, is
minor, the supposed legitimate daughter of the
late Colonel Searjinson, on account of her Wet.
gitimacy, and that he would direct an issue to try
that question. lie, the Learned Counsel, had
several affidavits in proof of her illegitimacy ; but
he would forbear, to state them, as it would be
better the question should go to the Jury unpre7
judiced. The affidavit of the Rev. Applicant Sex
forth, that Col. Searjinson, in the year 1806, will
confined for debt in the Sheriff's Prison in the
city of Dnblin,• and in the March previous his
first wife died without issue ; that during his im-
prisonment he became acquained with the mother
of the infant Anne Crowley, otherwise Atkins,,,.
the widow of a journeyman coach-maker, and in
a*short time after his being set at liberty, he mar-
ried her at St. Faults Church, in the city of
Dublin, and the minor was the supposed issue of
that marriage. ,That the deponent, in February
lay, received a letter from a_person of the name
of Eleanor Cummings, dated from 18, Townsend-
street, Dublin, stating, that she had been a ser-
vant of his brother's, and that she would commu-
nicate something to him that would put 30 or
40,0001. in his pocket, if he would come over to
Dublin. He employed a Mr. Carman, of French-
street, Dublin, to see her, and on that Gentleman's
interview with her, she declared the minor was not
the daughter of Colonel Searjinson, or of his wife
Anne Crowley, otherwise AtkinS ; that the de-
ponent in -March last went to Dublin and saw
Eleanor Cummings, who declared. to hint that,
the minor was the illegitimate daughter of a young
woman in a•low station of life ; that the!deponent
bad made inquiries in respect to the truth of her
information, and verily believes it .to be trite. He,
the Learned Connsel,,thereforeltud/ no doubt
but his Lordship would grant, the apyffestien.

The LORD CHAtiCeLLOR.-.:" I Hart,
as Counsel; you have used a proper discretion iii
not going into the evidence. it this young Lady has
hitherto been brought up as a child of the family,
I cannot, without more information, suspend her
allowance or displace her out of the family.."
Mr. WINGFIELD said, he was certain that when
his Lordship came to examine into the evidence,
he would find that the weight of it was in favOur
of the minor's legitimacy.
The LORD CHANCELLOR--," There had better
not he any thing more said on the subject no*..
Let the motion stand over, and let me be furnish-
ed with the affidavits on both sides.''

'PIAZZA COFFEE-HOUSE. -.
SIMSON ANDOmens V. HODGSoN AND OTHERS.;
Mr. HartTsaid,.this was a' motion for the COurt
:to refer it to the Master to appoint a receiver of
the-profits
arising from the, business carried on In .
the Piazza Coffee-house, Covent-garden. 'Te,
plaintiffs are the children (A Amos Gam, and tie
brothers of William. Gam, who died in 1817.-1—:
Amos Gain entered .into a partnership with W.
Hodgson, father of the defendant,„bx which 'the;
plaintiffs were,to have share and share alike, bni
the former havioß died in 1803 without making a
his willow took out letters of administration,
and carried on the joint concern with the present
defendant, his father having died in the interim,
and she, 41.1816,, resigned the
,whole to her son,.,
William•Garn, who carried it on with Hodgscin
lin 'September, 1817, when he died intestate also.
The plaintiffs, who are .next of kin, thought.it
their duty to bring this before the Court, to have
an account taken of the profits of the concern,.
they being his legal: representatives.
Mr.,Honatee opposed, the motion on behalf of
the defendants. Ile admitted that the partnership„
had existed between Gam and Ilodgson,,and
articles of, partnership had been drawn . up- and
agreed to,. by one of which the snrviving,partnter ,
was to, purchase the whole concern on the death
of the other. The defendant. had. repeatedly qt-
fered to do so, nod had. uniformly shown•the ut7,
most anxi,ty to have the matter settled by arbi7
tration, there, not being one shilling due which
he was not ready to pay.. All that he requir'ed
was, .to have his 1401 right granted him, and no:
person could deny that he SboOd have it.
The LORD CEIANCRLLOR refused the motion, on
the ground of gio satisfactory reason being'shosyn
to jutisfy him •.in injuring this defendant's prp-
petty in :Covent-garden, by appointing
.a receiver.
He strongly.advised theparties to refer the nit.
ter in dispute to an arbitrator.

PRACTICE*OF -THE COURT.
The LORbCHANCELLOR was applied to oy one!o
the Counsel to permithim to oppose a motion tvltiOt
had unfortunately been he'a'rd during his absence
in another Court. His Lordship replied, that he
certainly should not; on any pretext whatever, do
to he had' been repeatedly obliged to -rise and
leave the Court on account, of the absence of

towilsel, who irete fount[-ercq rise titan
here. In future, he would not permit ibis Court,
%villa was the highest in the country, to he treat-.
ed in such a manner ; and he now gave notice,
that it a motion was to be opposed, and-those
who were to oppose it were not 'present, he would
grant-the order, with full costs ;. nor would he
afterwards'discharge such order, except on a new
motion, and on being satisfied that costs were
paid. " The Vice-Chancellor, the Master of the
Rolls,• and the Court of Exchequer, "• said his
Lordship, " will wait for oohody, and why am I
to do it ? If Counsel have so much business that
• they must attend -every where, then let them di-
vide that business, for I shall not wait for a single
person. ; have known three Counsel engaged to
oppose' A. motinn, not one 'of whom have been
here. Am' lto be-told they-are speaking at
one time before the Vice-Chancellor ? Personally
I have no feeling on the subject,- but sitting here
as Lord- Chancellor, I am determined I shall not
submit any longer to such conduct."

COURT OF RING'S lIENCI-t, ;JULY 17%
•13ALDOCK V. WA•TEI?LIUUyB. •

7This was an actiowagainsuthei detendant,voi
prietor of the Swan with Two Necksinn, Lad.
lane, as a common carrier, to recover the sum of
24!. the valne of a palcel Containing wearing lip-
parel, booked at bit-office by-tlre• plaintiff 'to go
by the Exeter mail, into -Devonshire, bat which
Was lost in its passage thitiier.•'lt appeared that
the plaintiff, baying sent bisiamily. to reside in
Devonshire, had purchased some clothing to be
sent alter him; The tailor had booked the goods
in question at the defendant's coach-office, on the
22d of December, to go by the-Exerermair, but
it never •arrived at its destination; • It 'was sworn
by the person who booked the parcel, that he had
not received notice of the defendant's restricted
liability to pay for goods not exceeding 51. tinlesS
paid for accordingly, and that he had not seen it
board fixed up in the office, ix feet by four, to
that effect.

The Ctiter JUsTicß charged the Jury, that by
law a-carrier is liable for the whole amount of the
loss of goods entrusted to his care, unless he gives
special notice of restricted liability. Such notice
was negatived in the present case by the man who
delivered the parcel, and therefore the plaintiff
was entitled to recorer.---Verdict for the plain,-
tiff.—Damages, 241.-Costs, 40s.

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS,.JULY 17.

CONSPIRACY TO SEDUCE WORKMEN.

OUNTER V. ASTOR,

Thla *as an action brought by the plaintiff, a
respectable pian'o4otte nianntactUrer, against
Elizabeth Astor and 'Sons, of Cornhill, who deal
extensively in the same trade; for a conspiracy,
in taking from the plaintiff fourteen of his woik•
men, during the existence of:their regulatfengage-
ment with him. There were several other counts
in the declaration, which charged the defendants
with a breach of contract, &c.
Several of the workmen were examined in sup-
port of the plaintiff's case. From their testi-
mony it appeared,- :that early in January last they
were induced by the Messrs'. 'Astor to assemble to-
gether for the ptirpose of receiving.an offer ro quit
their master's employ, and .go over to the• defen-
dants; they were entertained with plenty of bread,
beer, ale, gin, and .rum, •and, regaled themselvCs
heartily, so that they did nut return to 'do ratty
other business on that day. Many of them re-
jected the solicitation to quit the plaintiff's, but
others yielded, and signets a paper, consenting to
go to work with the defendants the moment they
had finished the piece•work on which they were
then.,engaged at the Tlaintiff's. Fourteen agreed
to do this, aud each received for so doing one
pound.
It also appeared in evidence, that a contract.
had subsisted for some time bet.ween the plain-
tiff's house and the defendants, in which the
latter had stipulated to take a certain' notnber
of pianos weekly from the plaintiC• at a sti-
pnlated ptice, and that • the defendants had,
on 'more than one occasion, regretted the
existence of this agreement, and intimated-a de•
sire to keep in their own pockets the money they
paid the plaintiff for manufacturing pianos for
them. When some of the!, workmen, dutiog their
'negotiation- with- the,defendaUts, alluded to the
'force of. this contract, one of the Messrs. Astor
was stated to have,said, that they would soon
-render the plaintiff unable to fulfil his .pat t of
in the result, was the tact,
owing to the
removal of so many of his men.. The contraCt
was ,said to be worth from 8001. to 1,0001 a-year,
and was for seven years, subject to a clause of
separation 'at three. years.
For the defendants, two witnesses were called;
who proved that when complaints were made re-
specting some of the pianos to the plaintiff, he
spoke in an angry tone, and expressed a desire to
get rid of thecontracci,which he offered .to burn ;
that afterwards some .negotiation was carried on
for the purchase of,the plaintiff's stock, which did
not terminate loan}, agreement.
' The CHIEF JOSTICH held that the seduction of
the men WO clearly made out, and lett the amount,
'of damages to'be ascertained by the Jury.
, The 'Jury, offer five minutes' consideration',
turned a •verdict for the plaintiff—Damages, t)c-
, teen Hundred Pounds., -

P,OXIID OF EXCISE,

CAUTION TO ARTISTS.

Mr. Bull, a painter, was charged with painting
transparencies, not being duly licensed for the
lle was also charged with baying painted
a transparency upon cloth fur which the duty had
'no.' been paid.
.1. R. Robinson, an exciseman, staled, that lie
was passing by the corner of Curzon-street, May-
fair, when he saw a:young man painting a large
n.ansparency., I-le.asked him if_ was:lieetlSY4 ?
ToAthich•he replied in the negative, and asserted
• that- he had never heard before that any such thing
was requisite. Perceiving that the cloth iipOn
.which it Was painted and no stamp upon it, the
witness seized it. •

The transparency was condemned, but the. Court
remitted the penalties.

IMITATIVE PEPPER:

By an 'act •passed in the last Seasion of Parlia-
ment, which has been in fore• nince the sth of

the polver of inea,tetin; ;31 "gel
where fabricated pepper Islay ,Le fount! upon An,
premises, was transferred froni. the Cnst"nis 1:;
the liAcise. This power, which never was actc-
upon in the Customs, has been at:ended will' Yen/
important consequences in the hands of the active
agents .of the Excise. The, moment the act pa";
ed, barrels of fabricated pepper began, to roll rota
his Majesty's warehouses. One officer seized
eighteen .humlred weight ; another seized c
teen hundred 'weight ; and he utmost Of"
fusion has been occasioned amongst the trove"
!lions fabricators, who have been making fortune.%
by this manufacture: The new whole peOPer'id
made up of the hulls of mustard•seed, gide, affil
chalk, and a certain quantity of stuff called
The profit derived by the manufacturer, upon {so
pound, is 2s. 4d., ..a the sale has been [lost ea
b .
ten,ive, the proprietots„ who are now injeoport'll
having all at them respectable characters,,
being men of active, industrious, .and as characters`,
(i
appear to the speculations in which they yr°.

detected, enterplising habits. fait
The prna t es•affixed to the offence beurA
proportion. to those inflicted ;you dealers Oft;
vived of selling other spurious articles, by Whit,
the health of the community may suffer.:
prosecutions are to come on in November, in t.
Court of Exchequer.
The seizure of apurioui pepper already
.Fo`.
amount, if estimated at the rate of sale. made Di
the manufacturer, to an immense sum. that "11e
being 3s. 6d. a pound ; if upon the utility of 4",6
article in substituting real pepper,, to little or 19;
thing. The P. D., which' composes the greater
part of the materials, is sold .at 4d. a pound.

From the LONDON GAZGITi of July ilb.

•
[This Gazette contains a Proclamation by Olt
Prince Regent in Council, regalating the raigti
ntl
freight for the conveyance of gold, silver,
jewels, on baard his Majesty's vessels. It t''S
nOtifirs the appointment of George-During, '.A44
as Consul at Trieste.] . .

BANKRUPTCY SUPERSEDED.
J. Oughton, of Aston, Warwickshire, manufacturer.

BANKRUPTS.

off'

R. Thomson, Exeter-street, baker, July 27, Ang. 3, a-- ~•••
at ten, at Guildhall. Solicitor, Mr. Pontilex, 03-F*
buildings.
J. Smith and .1. Forsyth, Princes-street, nierchantsi;
Aug. 3, and 28, at ten, at Guildhall. Solicitor, Mr. 1"a"-4
Lawrence Poontney-lane. , aii•
W. Low, Hanover-street, %Val worth, merchant, July `24,,,-1-;,,,t
3, and 28, at ten, at Guildhall. Solicitors, Messrs. Nn' '
and Freeman, Basingball-street.
J. Allsop, South ampton, halier, Aug. 10, at one, 111 3.,00-
and 28, at one, at the• Coach and Horses, Southalo.lllrier
Solicitors, Mr. J. C. Sharp, Romscy ; and Messrs. ‘4
and Co. Bedford-row. SI
T. Lowe, Dartford, watch -maker, July 24, 31, and A l'5•00.
at eleven, at Guildhall. Solicitor, Mr. Bartlett, 13arti)
mew-close.
J. Browne and .1. Gregson, Charles-street, upholstereo,
27, Aug. 3, and 28, at ten, at Guildhall. Solicitor,
• J. Goren, Orch re
ard-stet. 141
Willy' Hurl 11, -facto Aug. „"

T. illett. ,turleston, ~ieshire, cheese-factor, _
and 28, at nine, at the Deg Tavern, Manchester.
citor, Mr. C. Wood, Manchester; and Messrs. Hurd
1
Co. Temple. tOt
W, Rathbone, Manchester, letter-press-printer, Aug. „
and 29, at the Star Inn, Manchester. Solicitors, Mc4"--,,ai
Ifalstead and Co. Manchester; and Messrs. :Milne ar,"'-
Temple. , Cii
T. Harris Liverpool, master-mariner, Aug. 9, 11'
•at one, at the George Inn, Liverpool. Solicitors, Nies:or
Pritt and Co. Liverpool; and Messrs. Blackstock and:
Temple. q SI
J. 0. Spring, of Coningsbv, Lincolnshire, draper, Atli;"
-and 28, at eleven, at the White Hart Inn, Boston. 1100
torsi Mr. H. Rogers, Boston; and Messrs. Jenkins and V-
, New-ion.
T. Fisher andT. Ashmore, Cheltenham and Wincliflori,)!:s
Gloucesteriture, bankers, July 28, Aug. t 1 ,' and 7."-,s.
eleven, at the Royal Hotel, Cheltenham. Solicitors,M"„sot
Vizard and Co. Lincoln's-inn-fields; and Messrs.
amid Co. Cheltenham. , .160
T.. Docura, Earitli, Huntingdonshire, victualler, Ju't,,eur
Ang. 10,-at ten, at the Crown 11)114'4. Ives, and 28, "t,ttj
at the George Inn, Huntingdon. Solicitors, .Messrs.
and Co-Holborn-court ; and Mr. G. G. Day, St. Ives.
J. Radcliffe, Swansea, grocer, July 54, 31, and Aug..!lica
twelve, at Guildhall. Solicitors, Mr. E. Chester, .44
inn; and Mr. Big?, Bristol. sir
0. W. Innen and G. Innell, Long-acre, oilmeny July g.''S
and Aug. 28, at twelve, at Guildhall. Solicitor, M "
T. Robins; Serjeants'-inn. All
J. Protheroe, Bristol, ship-broker, Ang. 2,3, and
yt 7014
eleven, at the Castle and Ball Inn, Bat h. Solicitors,
Young and Co. St. Mildred's court; and Mr. J. e""c
• shank, Bath. 2A 510
C. Stacey, Na4au..street, coffee-house-keeper, Sr*
and Aug. 28, at twelve, at Guildhall. Solicitor,
Richardson, Golden-square. July
E. Dean, Howard-place, Hackney-road, biscuit-bakec,l„ool
24, 31, and Aug. 28, 'at eleven, at Guildhall. b°"-,
Mr. Osbaldeston. London-street. A. Age
P. Butt, Cheltenham, grocer, July 29, at six, 30. au- Lora
.28, at eleven, at the Horse amid Groom Inn, Glove"- 1.,„
Solicitors, Messrs. Frowd and Co. Serle-street ; and Mr'
()key, Gloucester. , ,-t
DIVIDENDS. att.""j
Aug. 12, E. Turner, Great Slietstolar Wiltshire, C, 'Joe
manufacturer-July 97, J. Wilkerson, Barley, 11,refurn"
maltster-Aug. 7, T. Lavcock,'linories,slupsrllet~~ug F/
T. Jones, Deretend, Warwickshire, picture-fratue-nu 9r
Aug. 2t, C. S. Ashford, Harrow-road, irournunger--;A..t;:itho
B. Graham, Garstang, Lancashire, grocer-Ang. 21, J. -4-tcrr
Butcher-row, rectifier-Aug. 7, J. Gibson amid S. 1"01.-d Jo
Wardrobe-place, dealers in laCc-Aug. 7, .1. 'Metcalfe u"Dite.
Jeves, Upper East Smithfield, oilmen-July 31, J• %or
head, Cattaton-street, banker-July 91, .1. Kernot,
street, druggist-Aug. 16,. It. Yniteu, Leeds, merchant-yot'
7, D. Buchanan. S. M. Smith, and F. Ashley, Liverpool,
cliaittS---Atig. 10, T. N. Hirst and J. Wnod, HuddersP.o,
merchants-Aug. 9, T. Kershaw, Manchester, Ns"
manufacturer.

CERTIFICATES—Auavvr 7.
.; ter°
fi
T. M. Keats, Poultry, hat-manufacturer—R. rle, etr
Dartmouth, merchant—J. Tupnan, (treat itussell-stfer,
watch-maker—J. B. Greey, Sandwich,
Union-plate, Lambeth, waster-mariner—E. ll.Tucliett, 1311
toli grocer—S. Bradley, Sandwich, brrwer—W.
din! sgil'
South-street, cheesetoonger—P. Young', jun. Wappio;',4,l*
nrahcr—S. Johnson,
Gralrant, jun. cotton-sirinner—T. NOE Of,
Hart-yard, victualler.
•

•
Wet°
SVC:IA(I.-I'lle Average Price of Brown or Muscovado,' 1, tis
computed from the Returns made in the week culling °Li
1819, is 41s. 4id. pet cwt. • • • •

BIRTH.
AC Frome, Somerset, on tl,. 15th instant, the Lad,'
Sheppard, Esq. of a son and heir.

DIX,D,

Joii°

On Saturday'la'st, Mrs. Thompson, relict of the late "(
-Thompson, Esq. of Chiswick, Middlesex,•liKed 73.
At Portsmouth, on Sunday, the 4th inst. at the liotlif
his son-in-law, Captain Parrey, R.N. in the 8401 Year,!,,,,ise,
age, Thomas Tucker, Esq, formerly of the Custom-
London. • • •
ti,°s
LONDON: Printed by .1. B. CARSTAMS, of No. '29,w. A'
Ormond-street; Queen-square; and published I'V
•scitiprs, of No. 7, South Nlolton-street, at frO,;;
()like, No. 112, Strand: where- Adreitisements,
Leiters, etc, (post-paid) must be aldrcsscd.

%.
~~
~~

•

1

Eke

L 4,,

Rats

,ht.

Ae
tr;;,
NJ,

t,k
tvl,
the

4ii
IQ ,
Pr :t

Ntu

4,
•
eri)
tl,,t
1.,