The Sun.
London, England, 1845-02-06 00:00:00

'lr to i-11,4 anit,

inflicted on parties interested in private Bills, and
the great waste of time consequent upon the lengthy
speeches of counsel, and suggested the propriety
of counsel being excluded altogether.
Mr. EWART asked if the Government were pre-
pared to introduce any measure to prevent Members
from serving OR private Committees who had an
interest in the questions submitted to those Com-
mittees.
Sir R. PEEL was not prepared to make any such
announeement.
Lord Howicic complained of the injustice which
would be inflicted on parties interested in those Rail-
way Bills, against which the Board of Trade had re-
ported, if no longer time were given them for the
presentation of petitions for their Bills, than was
allowed for the presentation of petitions for other
private Bills. The Noble Lord complained of the
system which gave such vast powers to the Board of
Trade, and concluded by suggesting that the time
allowed for bringing in Railway Bills should be
twenty-one days after the report of the Board of
Trade should be printed.
Sir R. PEEL agreed with the Noble Lord that
some delay ought to take place with regard to rail-
way Bills, and proposed that the discussion should be
adjourned in order to consider the subject.
A short discussion followed, in the course of

and snuff-takers, the more industrious of our artizans,
&c., have, all of them, by turns, been clamorous for
the repeal of the malt-tax, the duties on raw cotton,
on windows, on tea, on tobacco, on paper, and so forth.
How to concede the application of A, without uniting
B and C in confirmed hostility to him, would have
been a sad puzzle for any Premier less fortunate, or
less cunning than the Premier. He makes a virtue of
necessity. " The income-tax will shortly expire?'
A great fact that, and highly proper to come into
her MAJESTY'S Speech. Her MAJESTY'S Government
are very reluctant to do without it; so her MAJESTY
is made to talk of the "expediency" of renewing it
for a further period. Something more is thus gained ;
the mind of the country is accustomed beforehand to
contemplate a proposition, which, if it came upon
them without so much of preparation, might prove
too startling to be adopted. On the other band, it is
at least as essential that much time should not be
allowed for the agitation of the several schemes of
remission. Therefore, Sir ROBERT fixes his Budget
exposition for the 14th inst. If, on that day, he can
carry the House of Commons with him, in voting that
the income-tax should be continued, he can afterwards
repudiate all remission applications in detail. "It is only
through the income-tax I realize any surplus of public
income over public expenditure You have already
resolved that it is necessary that the revenue should
exceed the charge of the current year. Her MAJESTY
is assured,—' that it will be our determination to
maintain an amount of revenue adequate to provide
for the public service, and amply sufficient to meet
the necessary expenditure of the country, and firmly
to uphold that public credit which is indispensable to
the national welfare.' If I give up th tax, I
have no surplus. If, retaining that tax, I give
up the taxes on malt, paper, cotton, tea, windows,
or any two of them, I shall yet have no surplus. In
the face of the resolution of Parliament and the
recommendation of her MAJESTY, I cannot, by ac-
ceding to your wishes, leave myself without the
means necessary for, and adequate to, the public ex-
penditure and services." This will be the Premier's
ease, and it is difficult, upon principle, to gainsay it.
But if this State necessity can really be shown for
retaining this war impost (for such it should exclu-
sively be) in the thirtieth year of an unbroken peace,
let us hope that Sir ROBERT PEEL will come forward
with some wise, just, and indispensable modifications
of its abominable inequality. To take seven-pence
in the pound from the hard-earned income of the man
with 1501. a year, is an infinitely larger demand upon
his means than Si. per cent. would be on the man of
from 6001. to 1,0001. a year ; or 71. 10s. per
cent. on all incomes from 1,0001. to 5,000/. ; or
101. per zer.t on all incomes from 5,0001. to 10,0001.;
and 121. 10s. per Cent. on all above 10,0001. The
Premier would gain, we suspect, by such a conver-
sion for the country, both in the increased aggregate
and the diminished coat of collection ; but this scheme
would mulct far more heavily than the scale he has
adopted, the redundant incomes of himself and his
most influential supporters. We do trust he will
carefully re-examine schedule D of his original Bill,
with a view to see how far he can relieve the small-
salaried clerk, the little tradesman, the limited an-
nuitant, and the more moderately paid of our mili-
tary and naval pensioners from the liability to contri-
hum 7d. in the pound out of their scanty incomes.
But we purp,-.se very silo:fly to recur more particu-
larly to this subject.
The general proceedings of both Houses on Tues-
day night were not very remarkable for a character
lof interest or excitement. In the House of Lords,
we observe that the Duke of MONTROSE warned the
Government of the serious embarrassment they were
preparing for themselves, by their most uncalled-for
attempt to force upon Scotland the PEEL currency
motion of 1819. In the Commons, after the speeches
of the mover and seconder of the address, the most
notable matters were the animadversionl of Lord
JOHN RUSSELL on the deportment of both i e French
and English Governments in respect to the Otaheite
affair, and the misunderstandings conseque7 t
thereon; on the disgraceful condition of affAirs in
Spain, for which credit had actually been taken, his
Lordship observed, as the result of the good under
standing between the Crowns of England and France ;
the omission from the royal speech of all allusion to
the beneficial extension experienced in our trade
with Chir.a, in happy fulfilment of Lord
PALMERSTON'S predictions as to the ultimate
results of the policy he had, when in
office, adopted; and of some very pointed reproba-
tion of the measures adopted by her MAJEsTx's
Ministers in reference to the late State Trials in Ire-
land. The Noble Lord was very happy in rallying
the Government for expecting that the Russian
Government would be impressed, through the visit of
the Emperor to Queen VICTORIA, with the necessity
of improving the existing relations between Russia
and this country, so long as we persisted in that anti-
free-trade system of duties which excluded from our
ports the greater proportion of commodities that, under
a more liberal system, Russia would be eager to
exchange with us. Lord PALMERSTON spoke with
his accustomed vigour and extreme acuteness
on the important questions of the increase of the
slave trade, and the blundering manner in which the
right of search, established under the treaties of
1830 and 1833, had been both attacked and vin-
dicated. Before Lord JOHN RUSSELL rose, Mr.
GLADSTONE made an impressive and interesting
statement, as to the conscientiously differing views
—on questions of religious and educational policy—
especially in their relations with Ireland, which he
entertained, and the necessity he had on that ac•
c,mnt felt himself under, of retiring from the Go-
vernment, which (it seems) is determined to carry
them. He distinctly avowed that he had not
been influenced, in this resignation of office,
by any misunderstanding whatever with his late col-
leagues, on commercial matters. The address in
answer to the speech was passed unanimously, though
some of the older school of Tories appeared to be
much scandalised at the Premier's emphatic pledge
that he would bring forward immediate measures for
extending the advantages of academical instruction
in the sister country, and for liberally extending the
grant to the Roman Catholic College at Maynooth.
Parliament will find business growing on their hands,
if they waste as much time on extraneous discussions
between this and July as they did last year. Let
them look to it !

which
Mr. VERNON SMITH asked whether the Govern-
ment was prepared to stand by the Board of Trade
reports as official, and whether the House was to re-
ceive them as having the weight and authority of
Government advice on one side or the other?
Sir ROBERT PEEL replied that the House had
acted in this matter by the advice of a Select Com-
mittee ; but it never was the intention of the Go-
vernment—it certainly never was his (Sir R. PEEL'S)
intention—to devolve upon the Board of Trade the
power of determining which railway plans should be •
adopted and which should be rejected: It was his
opinion that the influence of the reports of the Board
of Trade upon the decision of the Committees would
depend upon the weight of the facts and the value of
the information produced on the inquiry. It was
never his intention—nor would he ever consent to
any course which would involve the Government in
the determination of these questions between corn-
peting speculations.
After a few words from Mr. F. FRENCH, Lord
Flowicx withdrew his motion at the recommendation
of Mr. GREENE, on the understanding that all those
sessional orders which related to the subject should be
postponed.
The other sessional orders were agreed to.
Mr. ESN-ART postponed his motion on the subject of
the morning sittings of the House.
The Library Committee was appointed.
In answer to Mr. HumE, Sir JAMES GRAHAM
stated, that be could not undertake to proceed this
session with the County Courts Bill.
Sir JAMES GRAHAM gave notice, that he should
move for leave to. bring in the Law of Settlements
Bill to-morrow (this day) sen'night.
Sir R. PEEL, in answer to Mr. Ricr, said that the
report of the Commission on Harbours of Refuge had
been referred to the Admiralty. But the Govern-
ment had come to no decision with respect to any
harbour except that of Holyhead, where some works
would be carried on for facilitating the communica-
tion Frith that part of the United Kingdom.- The
Right Hon. Baronet likewise announced that her
MAJESTY would receive the address of the House in
answer to her gracious speech, at half-past two o'clock
to•rnorrow (this day.)
Sir JAMES GRAHAM, in reply to Mr. Humn, said,
that he intended to introduce a measure respecting
the charities of England during the course of the pre-

sent session.
Lord JOHN RUSSELL put a question on the subject
of the financial statement, in reply to which—
Sir R. PEEL said that he had already given notice
that he would bring forward- his financial statement
on Platy se'nnight, and on Friday next he would
state exactly what its purport would be.
Sir JAMES GRAIIAM gave notice of his intention to
introduce a Bill for the payment of the Clerks of the
Crown by salary instead of fees to-morrow (this day)
se'nuight.
On the order of the day for bringing up the report
on the address being read,
Mr. Hume urged upon the House the necessity of
relieving commerce by the removal of some of the
oppressive duties to which it was now subjected. He
expressed his approval of the manner in which the
Otaheite affair had been settled.
Mr. IVILLIAMS complained of the non-reduction of
the national expenditure.
Mr. S. CRAWFORD hoped that some measure would
be introduced to regulate the relation of landlord and
tenant in Ireland.
Mr. WALLACE by voting for the address would not
pledge himself to vote for the estimates.
Sir R. PEEL said that his voting for the address in-
volved no such pledge.
Mr. WAKLEY complained of the undue pressure of
the income-tax, and of the hardships inflicted on the
labouring classes by the existing law of settlement,
and expressed a hope that when the Bill of the Go-
vernment on the subject of that law should be intro-
duced, a Committee would be appointed to inquire
into the condition of the people. The Hon. Gentle-
man related a case illustrative of the cruelties
inflicted by the existing law, and asked if it was
surprising that outrage and discontent should exist
under such a state of things ? He then expressed his
approval of the foreign policy of the Government,
and his disapproval of the manner in which the State
trials in Ireland had Leen conducted, and suggested
to the Irish Members the propriety of proposing
measures for the redress of the grievances of Ireland,
leaving to Parliament the responsibility of rejecting
those measures if they should venture to do so.
The report on the address was then brought up
and agreed to.
Just as the House was about to rise, a petition was
presented from Mr. GEORGE MOFFATT, complaining
of an undue return for the borough of Dartmouth.
1 The House adjourned at Eight o'clock.

Her MAJESTY'S Speech on the opening of the
present session, and the debate of Tuesday in both
Houses, being now fully before our readers, they will
be enabled to form a pretty accurate judgment of the
general tendencies of the financial and commercial
policy which the Government are intending to pursue.
The very unusual announcement, by the First Lord of
the Treasury, of his resolution to bring forward the
Budget, or Government Financial Statement for the
year, at so early a day as the 14th instant, is, in some
respects, the most prominent feature of these opening
proceedings. In the almost abruptness of this notice
of motion, as given on behalf of the Right Hon.
Baronet, we find the indications of a somewhat alarm-
ing alacrity to follow out the significant hint con-
veyed in the following passage of her MAJESTY'S
Speech, viz. :—" The Act which was passed . . . . for
imposing a tax upon income will shortly expire. It
will be for you, in your wisdom, to determine whether
it may not be expedient to continue its operation for a
further period." Alas! for John Bull. He has no
more doubt of the " wisdom of Parliament's" dis-
covering that lie is still too plethoric in the region of
the pocket, and that it will be necessary still to reduce
this tendency to make money, by continuing that
venesection of his purse-strings which has been, now
for three successive years, resorted to by his Tam-
worth doctor, than a corpulent schoolboy anticipates
any division of opinion among his medical attendants,
when one of them submits to the other the extreme
propriety of repeating the nauseous doses that have
already brought him to death's door. The Minister,
to du him justice, does not get up the machinery of
his measures amiss. When they are most obnoxious
in character, he is most astute at devising the means of
arise tourthaii
getting over them quickly. When new difficulties
ismy
vpeceroryn hieneratcsahcaitnioielniin.ayio f his Government, he
tI employssk
an engine of Ministerial strabci
ntoelet overcomele nt ofthem,
weakness, because it is of obnoxious
to
os crlildaera cotleerr, intooie
obstacles offered to him b
ground,his oNv
alclardeNevrelloinvg.er
rth
delaya ty di others,cul and to accelerate
upon t
whichand i
s clangorousfraught
with imminent peril to his own power an
office. We have seen the demands
upon
illi tenuref of
or
re-
mission of taxes, which have been elicited on all
hands by the knowledge that the last quarter's
l
returns demonstrated a surplus of revenue over ex-
penditure. The landlords, the tenant- farmers, the
manufacturers, the householders, the poorer smokers

Wre think Lord HowicK is entitled to the thanks
of the public for the able manner in which he has ,
brought under the notice of the House of Commons
some of the inconveniences and hardships that may
result to parties legitimately interested in schemes
for the construction of new railroads, if the Stand-
ing Orders with regard to the presentation of peti-
tions for leave to bring in the necessary Bills to give
effect to such schemes, be allowed to remain in
their present shape. His Lordship shewed very
clearly, that after the new Committee of
the Board of Trade have decided on reporting against
a particular Bill, the parties are not allowed, at pre-
sent, anything like an adequate period for making up
their minds on the grave question whether or not it
can be worth their while, whatever the merits of
their scheme of railway, to attemptto carry it through
Parliament in the face of an adverse report from the
Board of Trade's Committee. This dilemma, which
it now appears is so probable, is the very re-
sult that we anticipated in the several arti-
cles published lately in The Sun, in which
we have expressed our serious apprehensions
as to the prejudicial working of the large discre-
tion, and too invidious influence on all such ques-
tions that have been devolved on this Committee.
We trust that in the debate of this evening, on Lord
Howic K's motion, the propriety of revising and re-
stricting the powers of the Board of Trade's Railway
Committee will be dispassionately and carefully dis-
cussed. In some respects the anomalous indirect au-
thority of the official body we speak of is really greater,
at present, than that of a Parliamentary Committee.

LONDON, THURSDAY, FEBRUARY G, 1845.

The House of Commons met at Four o'Clcck. A
great number of petitioLz for new lines of railway
were prissented.
In answer to a question from Mr. WALLtcn, Mr.
W. E. GLADSTONE stated that all the railwpy com-
panies but two had ccmplied with the provisions of
the Act of last session, in providing additional ac-
commodation for third-class passengers.
Sir JAMES GRAHAM, in answer to a question from
Mr. HUME, expressed his willingness to institute an
inquiry into the operation of the Scotch Prisons Act.
The usual sessional orders were then moved, and
during the course of the discussion on them,
Mr. WALLACE complained of the great expense

We have observed with pleasure-that Mr. WAL-
LAcr, the Member for Greenock, is at his post again,
and, as heretofore,. looking to the interest of the
many in place of the few, which ►viil be best explained
to our readers by giving copies of the two following
notices of motion respecting railways, to which we
hotbliftiteonteiee. only to add our rEcommendation that th6se who
have suffered from non-compliance with the provisions
the
hAimet.:7 the accommodation of the public in
third-classslt Member
en m;csearirnrmi
‘a;vagyhei het oi
the
sde
b,
ceaewsnei t‘ol.lifoouti
violated,,
delay,teedi,
public
l publish

"To inquire of the Presitient,of the Board of Trade'

THE EON, LONDON, THURSDAY EVENING, FEBRUARY 5, 1845.

how many of the Railway Companies coming within_ the
provisions of tho Act of last session had complied with
the regulations laid down in the sixth clause, as to
having seats and protection from the weather for the
and also how many
" To call the attention of the House, to the several re-
had conveyfa fail nports made by the Select Committees on railways, to the
e dc eioof
to third-class
c comply."
passengers,
appointment of the Board constituted by the Board of
Trade on the 24th of August, 1844, for the transaction of
railway business, and to the nature and effects of its
published decision!! on the interests of the country, with
a view to the !elusion and amendment of the Railway
Act of last session."

We have received Madrid journals of the 29th ult.
The Chamber of Deputies was engaged in discussing
the Bill for the abolition of the slave trade, and
after some progress, adjourned till the 31st. General
Pam, who had been restored to liberty, was expected
to arrive from Cadiz in a few days; and it was said
the General SERRANO, who had been exiled from the
capital, had been sent for, and that an important
command was to be conferred upon him. General
CONCHA had also been ordered to come to Madrid,
and re-organise the cavalry on a new plan, after which
he was to resume the command of the Basque Pro-

vinces.
The Three per Cents. closed at 32+ for cash,
and 324 at 60 days, and the Five per Cents. at 23
15-16 at 60 days• _

senting in their true light the atrocity of Roses, and the
necessity, of again placing the Banda Oriental under the
protection of some of the great Pewersontty have ad- ,
vaneed the am.ognients which Lad aiready iy.en come
to between the French and English Governments."
The Revue de Paris states that letters were received
on Monday by the Government from Captain BRUAT,
Governor of Otaheite, in which he states that he had
adopted measures for operating without any unplea-
sant complication, the transition from " absolute pos-
session" to the "protectorate." That journal adds:—
" We have not heard if M. BRUAT mentions having
completely succeeded in the accomplishment of his
moderate and pacific intentions; but we apprehend
that such has not been the case, for a report prevails
that fresh scenes of revolt and collision occurred
at Otaheite after the receipt of the dispatches en-
joining the immediate restoration of Queen POMARE."

T papers are chiefly occupied with the
appointment of M. DE SALVANDY to the Department
of Public Instruction, and the dismissal of the two
Members to which we adverted yesterday. M.
THIEHS'S journal is highly indignant at these steps
taken by the Ministry, though, strange to say, it re-
gards them as omens of their speedy downfal. Were
the writer sincere, he would be the last man in the
world to blame M. GUIZOT for a line of policy which
must be so gratifying to the leader of the Opposition.
The Constitutionnel regards the subject, however,
iu such a serious light, that it devotes two columns to
abuse of the Ministry, and concludes the article in
these words :—" The fury of the Cabinet against the
dissentient Conservatives produced yesterday a deep
irritation at the Chamber. M. Duoussr DE LHUYS
was surrounded by Deputies protesting against his
disgrace. The Ministers were publicly questioned as
to their intention of dismissing M. Durns, the Pro-
cureur- General at the Court of Cassation, and whether
they would carry to its extreme lengths their ex-
treme political extravagance. Remarks were made
on the strange contrast of this violence with the pro-
found calm which reigns in France, with the
public peace, and with the remarkable moderation
of the Opposition. It is no longer against the Left
or the Left Centre only that war is proclaimed ; it is
against the moderate Conservatives, who maintain the
liberty of their votes. It was also remarked that this
measure of the Ministers strangely inaugurated the
entry of N. DE SALVANDY, and rendered still more
ridiculous, more intolerable, the position of the new
ministry of Public Instruction. Last year M. DE
SALVANDY had also been dismissed for a vote ; he
had complained of it loudly—had filled the two
Chambers with the noise of his disgrace—and behold,
the very day that he becomes Minister, two func-
tionaries of the diplomatic older are severely visited!
The Olnniteur, in fact, informs 113 that Count DE ST.
PRIEST, Minister Plenipotentiary at Copenhagen, has
also been dismissed on account of his vote. These
wretched acts of violence were regarded by all as the
infallible symptoms of the last moments of the ex-
piring Ministry. It agitates itself in its impotence ;
it attaches its hopes to expedients which are precipi-
tating its end; no violent means appear to it to be
proper to be neglected ; it feels itself dying. Its
terrors and agonic, are proved by its convulsive
movements. The Chamber has judged it; it sees
clearly that it cannot escape its sentence. It is

THE BOURSE--TUESDAY, FEB. 4.
First Highest Lowest Last
Pride. Price. Price. Price
French Five per Cents.. •• • • 122 50 .. 122 50 .. 122 20 .. 122 30
Three per Cents.•• • • 85 5 .• 85 5 .. 85 .. 85
New Loan •• •• 86 15 .. 86 15 86 15 .. 86 15
Collin Bank, I,ooof. Shares • .10 0 ..1090 ..1090 ..1090
Belgian Bank. • • 635 .. 635 .. 635 .. 635
Belgian Fives, 1840
1842 .• •••• 10614 .. 10614 .. 106% .. 10611
Four-and-a-Half 103 .. 103 .. 1027 .. 102%
Two-and-a-Half.... 62 .. 62 .. 62 .. 62
Spanish Threes ..... ....... 41 14 • . 41% .. 41% .. 41%
Active •• •• •• 384 .. 394 .. 38% .. 3914
Passive ...... • . • • .. 7 .. 7 .. 7 .. 7
Now Deferred • .•• 8M • . 81A .. 8% • . 8y
Portuguese Five per Cents.. 60 .. 60 .. 60 .. 60
Neapolitan • • •• •• •• .. 99 50 .. 99 50 .. 99 50 .. 99 50
R0man.............1054 .. 10514 .. 1054 .. 1a514

Le derider four (fun condamn.
The Ministerial Globe of Tuesday, however, places
the question in a fairer light :—" M. LHERBETTE
3 esterday," it says, " made a sort of demi-proposition
relative to the dismisal of M. DROUIN DE LUHYS. In
place of formally demanding an explanation, which
the Cabinet declared it was ready to give, he inti-
mated that he should return to the subject when the
Bill relative to public functions was brought in. As
this Bill is to be discussed to-morrow, M. LIIERBETTE
will not have long to wait. Unfortunately, M.
LIIERBETTE will not have much to say to-morrow,
unless it be that the dismissal of M. DROUIN DE

Lnuys has been too long delayed. It as, in fact, no
denied
sleeirgn:
ihnieletdpe scandaloossfibale publicly,t
f 0 policyarb ne
fora
oaflnuddn ae
which,t
amino
consequently,an attachedlardyrn
tinoispt
rrproperly
eohrneleyi as
Ilevpl
served
retefodho therie.
oiontungdohetlt delicacy :sy,aa
said
so
thatbtloig be
aes
When the will does not go on the same side as duty, it
m
ahims danuttyo-.
quitln his post.
oastc.aseA,ncdomlemt
Deputy is inviolable in his convictions. Without
doubt the conviction of a Deputy
respected ; but a Deputy who accepts public functions
ought to accept the obligations which he contracts.
The first of these is to devote himself sincerely to the
service confided to him; but how can one devote one's-
self to a work which one disapproves of, fights against,
and endeavours to trammel ? In accepting public
functions, a Deputy knows perfectly well that he will
ought to expect such
have to exercise them under various and successive
Minisatrmieast.terAuntarnegseeenof;h
policye
him
changes ; and, if one of these systems of policy ap-
pears to him to be contrary to his principles, his
conscientious duty orders him either to keep his opi-
nions and retire, or to sacrifice his opinions to the
place which he holds and remain. No casuistry
will enable a man to get out of this dilemma.
The Journal des Debats contains the following
reply to the animadversions of the Opposition press on
the appointment of M. DE SALVANDY :
,t The appointment of the Count de Salvandy to be
Minister of Public Instruction has surprised and annoyed
the Opposition, insomuch that its journals have not been
able to suppress their spite. We can easily account for
this spite,
and
das easily conceive that the coalition can-
not dissatisfaction that the Cabinet should be
seewithout
thinking of its completing itself, and of rendering its
existence more stable, when it was believed to be on the
verge of falling. The adhesion of a man of so much im-
portance as the Count de Salvandy is a happy event for the
Cabinet, and that the coalition should comprehend and be
vexed at this is most natural. But what we can less imagine
cate that it had azquired rights over M. de Salvandy l?
is the surprise of the coalition. Does it not seem to indi-
Does it not seem to say that ho had entered into a com-
pact with M. Thicrs and M. Billault ? No ! M. de
right to the coalition to
has entered into any engage.
Salvandy
Rirelyen tupowithn hashi nevery
it.
m ;
he
.\ willenge vi veesrn a
a y
more : M. de Salvandy has
never tampered with any coalition, an honour, by the
way, in these times, too uncommon. This is a homage
which we, more than any one else, have the right of
rendering to the firmness of his convictions and the
noble probity of his character. The coalition well
knows that M. de Salvandy has kept himself completely
aloof from all its manoeuvres. It cannot be ignorant
that, in the debates on the Address, he voted against all
the amendments, and associated himself without reserve
or hesitation with the policy of the Cabinet. Since the
discussion of the Address, he has taken the most open
and active part in rallying and re •organising the Conser-
vative party. A conduct so loyal and patriotic gives un-
doubtedly no claims to the good graces of the coalition,
and we can easily conceive its chagrin."
The Railroad Police Bill pass3d the Chamber of
Deputies on Monday. In the course of the sitting
M. LIIERDETTE alluded to the late dismissal of M.
DRoUIN DE LDUYS, which he declared to be a violent
attack on the independence of the Deputies. M.
Gum.; in reply, stated that he was ready to give
explanations on the subject whenever the Chamber
might deem it proper to demand them. The discus-
sion was, by common consent; postponed to the period
when the Secret Service Money Bill is under delibe-
ration.

Galignani's Messenger contains the following re-
marks relative to the affairs of Monte Video :
" The Constitudionnel has a long article on the affair
of Monte Video, in which it attacks M. Guizot with
much severity for having so long tolerated the infamous
cruelties of Rosas towards French subjects, and suffered
the interests of French commerce to be compromised.
From some of the remarks on this article we may regard
it as the preliminary of a formal notice of the subject
in the Chamber by M. 'Tiers, who has probsbly
strengthened his case by some new and important facts
which have reached him through an authentic channel.
The 7obst,tat'orinel seems to think that M. Guizot has
in this attair been guilty 0f the most culpable apathy,
and observes that a single word from him would have
put an end to the attack upon Monte Video, and de-
livered that place for ever from the persecutions of its
FLemy. On this occasion, however, and the circumstance
is really a novelty, no attempt' is made to impute the
conduct of M. Guizot to any fear of offending England.
On the contrary, it would appear from the general bear-
ing of the article of the Cotit,,ronni, that M. Guizot
has rath,r resisted than complied watt the w•shes of the
English Government on this question. We have reason
to believe, however, that some understaAirg has b
come to between the Earl of Aberdeen and M. Guizot,
and it is not improbable that the visit recently paid to
the French Miaixter of Foreign Affairs by General
O'Brien, who: acne to Europe for the purpose of repie-

_ —.----
-
tion, prohibiting parties from carrying on the business house to the distillery. They found a great variety s.,_
of rectifying within a quarter of a mile in a direct line from which might cut off the water in even' dies . ~s., s `)nito
premises used -in distilling, adding that when the Act was plied' to Mr. Smith to know -*Vales 'ars.
nlib'
-Cc nseut.
passed the Messrs. Smiths were exempted on account of the their experiments, to which Mr. Smith refused his
_,
loss which they would otherwise suffer lions the provision They observed, however, that the cock of the branch O'
were
with respect to the distance between a rectify- the sink and the cock of the spirit vat, No. 8,
_,
ing house and a distillery. But no distiller at nearly on a level. The officers proposed tooth*); "
end
the present day could set up a distillery within a experiment.' They got a small tin pipe and put
he
corn-
quarter of a mile of a rectifying house. With regard to into a tub of water, as a cyphon ; they stopped all t
__seas
those persons whose premises were in existence at the time munication, and then, as they considered, the conunutiithe
of the passing of the Act, it was to be observed that they tion was complete between the vat No- 8
were within the benefit of the proviso, so long and distillery and the vat No. 17 in the rectifyingulla_nennse:e
as long only as there was no way, opening, or The result of the experiments tried in const:clu bs
other communication, by which any spirits could be of the discovery which had been made was, thato,e
_s
conveyed from the one to the other, except by an means of this communication there were conveyed
3fo:
open carriage or waggon. The object of . this regula- in one hour 658 gallons of proof skirits from
tion must be apparent, when he stated that the premises of Bin the distillery to the vat ICo. 17 in the rectifyt,iline; Itlsfii
rectifiers were not exposed to the same constant supervision This experiment was made by persons not experience'. of
and visitation, on the part of the officers of the revenue, as passing spirits through water-pipes, and not as
the jur s
those of a distiller, and that the only charge which took passing it swiftly as those who, he thought, slved the
place in the case of a rectifier was, when the spirits were now believe, were in the habit of doing so. This
reduced
permitted out to his customers. The premises of the mystery—this accounted for the excess of spirits
P not for
rectifier were closed from 'seven o'clock in the evening until above what appeared on the receiver. But it was
mations
seven o'clock the next morning, and during that period no passing spirits through this pipe the present info!
p._ss
officer could have access to them, except by permission of were laid. The defendant was charged with having ,
_Wre
`cap
the proprietor of the concern. It was obvious, therefore, through which spirits could be passed, and it was nott t° "
that if there were any communication concealed from supposed that for any other purpose the defendan
as the
the officers, frauds to an enormous extent might have rendered himself liable to such heavy penaltie?sdoin of
be committed. Now the charge which the Crown law hsd fixed. It showed in this very case the wisdom
' rooms
preferred against Mr. George Smith was, that he had carried the law in providing that persons in the business_
on his business of a distiller within a quarter of a mile of his defendant, should not supply themselves with c
th
ectifiers-
brother's rectifying premises, in such a manner as to bring of transmitting spirits from the distillery to the r,.os. his
hircself within the penal clause of the Act, there being a coin- He could not conclude his address without exPre,sUdast.
munication between the two sets of premises. The charge surprise at the course of pleading adopted by tbe defendant.
defendant with
brought against the defendant was grounded on the fact that The first count of the indictment charged the
esssra A
there had been a way or communication between his distillery carrying on a distillery within a quarter of a mil "'s.
Butt'-old
premises and the premises of his brother, the recitifier, by rectifying house. To that he pleaded not guilty
i;
_hid, he
which spirits:could be conveyed from the one set of premises Smith ought to know that for the three years i "
blc to the
to the other. The object ofthe Act was preventive and pro- had been carrying on the business, he had been lia_ esion is
tective. It was not necessary that the officers of the revenue penalties, as he would see upon referring to the dve
`*orris,s
should prove that the pipe had been used ;it was sufficient the case of Start v. Smith, in the Ist 13rainwell •• t
assed at
to show that it might be used for r the purpose page 194. He (the Solicitor- General) had tresPs.„,_ but
of conveying spirits. They, could not show that great length upon the time of the Court and thede "
would
on; any particular occasion spirits actually passed. The the importance of the case would be his apology
had
stated i
stock of the distiller was only taken by the officer once a fort- now call witnesses to prove the facts which he
ull atten
night. The premises of the rectifier were sealed against and he felt confident that the jury would devote
cater 9 safe
him. During the night spirits might be clandestinely tion to the case. He was sure that public justi 11 the
the '
conveyed while there was no person upon the premises in their hands, and that they would apply
to watch the proceeding. This might be done case with impartiality and discernment. ress.)
furtively, and so securely as to elude all observation.
(The case was proceeding when we went to p
He, therefore, at once charged the defendant, Mr. George
Smith, with having, according to the express terms of the
law, incurred the penalty of 5001. a week by carrying on his
distillery business within a quarter of a mile of the premises
of his brother, not being within the benefit of the pro-
viso of the Act to which he had referred, on account of
the open way or communication which existed between
them. The Learned Counsel then referred to the 15th
and 16th sections of the Act of Parliament, contending
that the term communication, as there used, applied
to a pipe connecting a distillery with a rectifying-house.
It was quite clear from the words of the Act, that by the
word " communication" the Legislature meant, among
other things, to include a pipe. Every word used in the
15th and 16th sections was applicable to pipes con-
necting different vessels and utensils with each other.
Here, then, he made his stand upon the law. If he
were right in the view he was presenting to the jury,
the case was made out against the defendant. But
now it might perhaps be said, that it was a harsh mea-
sure of justice to apply the penal provisions of this Act of
Parliament so stringently and so closely; that to rest upon
the letter of the law was hard in any case, while in this it
would be overwhelming. He was not insensible to the feel-
ing that might be excited by this view of the case, and he
was anxious to remove any unfavourable impression which
might exist with regard to the proceedings instituted by the
Crown. Although he was not required to advance a single step
beyond the position which he had assumed, lie was anxious
to satisfy the minds of the jury as •to the propriety
of all that had been done in reference to that prosecution.
Mr. George Smith was carrying on his business under an en-
try of his premises made on the 15th of September, 1840. Ac-
cording to the provisions of the Act, besides the entry of the
place of business, and the utensils or vessels employed iu it, it
was necessary to give a description or drawing of all the pipes
and all the branches of pipes upon the premi:es, and to point
out distinctly with what they communicated. The Learned
Counsel then referred to the 32d section of the Act
requiring this account. Mr. Smith's entry was accompanied,
not with a drawing showing, the course of the pipes,
but with a written description of them. The Learned Coun-
sel then quoted the words of the entry, which stated at the
close that the
. _. _

the contents Of the titensll; With which they were connected,
and that the use of the said cocks attached to them was to open
or intercept; as occasion might require, the communication
by means of the pipes. - In order that the jury might un-
derstand his statement, he must shortly describe the process
of distillation. They were aware that the materials usually
employed in distillation in England were a mixture of malt
and grain. These materials, after being ground, were put
into a large vessel called the . mash tub. Hot water was
poured into the mash tub for the purpose of infusion ; and
then the mixture was stirred 'or mashed for the purpese of
extracting the saccharine matter by the action of the water,
upon the grain and m'alt. When the 'infusion • Was
complete the result of it was drawn into a receptacle
called the under-vat. • It then passed either Into cooling vats,
exposed to the open air, or pipes . immersed. in cold water,
for the purpose .of being cooled. From the frigerator it'
passed into what were called wash-vats where the process of
fermentation began. Up to that period the mixture was
known by the name of Worts. In the wash-vats the
process of fermentation took place by the aPplica-.
Lion of yeast, or of a mixture which was known by the name
of harm. In the course of the fermentation, by the
decomposition - of - the saccharine and the deve-
lopment of the spirituous matter, the whole
liquid became attenuated in its specific gravity ;
and the first charge for duty took place at this stage of the
process, The Learned Gentleman referred to the Act of
Parliament to show the mode in which the duty was
charged. When .the fermentation was complete, and the
duty had been ascertained, the liquid was run into what was
called a wash-charger ;* and then that part of the process,
which was called the brewing process, ended. From the wash-
charger the wash was conveyed to the still, and the apparatus
now generally used was called Coffee's apparatus. By the
Act of Parliament it was required that the spirit should be
conveyed in a close safe into the receiver ; and when
in the receiver the quantity of proof spirits was ascertained
and charged. For the protection of the revenue, there was in
the first place a notice given by the distiller of the working
gravity of his worts. '1 hen there was the charge made after
the fermentation process, which was called the wash, or at-
tenuation ; and, lastly, there.was the charge made when the
spirits were perfected and had been conveyed into the re-
ceiver. (The Learned Counsel then referred to a model which
was placed on the table in front of the bar, of the whole of the
premises both of the distillery:and rectifying-house.) The
defendant had been permitted to use a trough for the con-
veyance of water from the liquor vats across the distillery
premises into the rectifying premises, near to the still heads,
which was an open trough, visible to the • eye during the
greater part of its progress, That trough was ostensibly used
for the conveyance of water only ; whether it was used for
any other purpose the jury. would presently be able to
judge. They would bear in mind that there was a
pipe communicating with the dwelling-house, the gra-
naries, and the stables. In the year 1842 a very
intelligent supervisor, named Drinkwater, was appointed
to this distillery, and his _attention was early directed to the
state of the premises in general. The spirit receiver used on
the premises by Mr. George Smith was a vessel of the dia-
meter of 15 feet, and of the depth of 45 inches, and its ca-
pacity was about 4,000 gallons. Mr. Drinkwater, at a very
early period of his supervision, suspected that the drip of that
vessel had not been correctly taken. It frequently hap-
pened that in vessels used for such a purpose there were
inequalities at the bottom, or it might be that there was an
incline, and it was necessary to take that into account in
charging the duty. The drip was used to bring the
spirits to an assumed level. When Mr. Drinkwater came to
the premises, the drip of the spirit receiver had been taken at
260 gallons, and the. dip of that drip at 4 7-10 inches. It
was quite obvious that if there was any mode of conve3-ing
spirits which was not seen by the officer, he would be
baffled in his attempts to charge the duty. Mr. Drink-
water determined to re-dip the vessel, 'and on doing so,
he discovered that instead of the drip being 4 7-10 inches it
was only 4 6-10 inches, and although that difference might
appear trilling, yet on examination it would be seen that
there were in that way 330 gallons abstracted during a single•
week, and that .the. defalcation in one year would amount to
2,0001. On the vessel being dripped a second time, another
tenth of an inch was gained. In the month of
March, 1844, two surveying examinerif went to the
premises. These examiners' discovered that the pump
used for the purpose of pumping up the spirits
from the receivers into the store vats was so loose, that
water could by that means be let down into the spirit re-
ceiver. They, therefore, directed that a revenue lock should
be put upon the pump. - On this being done, the drip was
again taken, and the result was the discovery of two-tenths
of an inch more. It was remarkable that the stock agreed
perfectly with the charged spirits. Mr. Drinkwater was in-
duced to pay more minute astention to the proceedings
of the defendants, and he then discovered a semi-
circular hole in the stop of the spirit receiver. He
mentioned this circumsiance 'to Mr. George Smith,
who exclaimed that that explained a statement made
to him in an anonymous letter, that there were parties
extracting spirits from his premises at three o'clock
in the afternoon. The Learned Counsel then proceeded to
state the particulars of the proceedings of Mr. Drinkwater in
pursuing his inquiries. There were ten periods. A strict watch
being kept on the 7th, it was discovered there was an excess
of 981 gallons over six previous periods, an excess of the
quantity of wort produced by the process. On the Bth the
defendant was left to himself, and there was a deficiency of
1,551 gallons less than that produced in the last period. In
the ninth and tenth periods a strict watch was again
kept, and in the ninth there was an excess of 1,709
gallons, the duty upon which was 669/, and in
the tenth, of 2,090 gallons, the duty upon which
was 8181.. This led him to the very point of the inquiry
before the Court. He would show that there was a way by
which these spirits could be conveyed so as to escape paying
duty, and the Excise would have been guilty of a gross
dereliction of duty if they had not proceeded against the
defendant for this gigantic fraud. On the 14th of October
last, Mr. Drinkwater, who had been searching to
discover what could have become of these spirits,
visited the rectifying-house, and he then observed
some water running from the end of a pipe in the distillery
to the still heads. He went into the distillery premises to
stop the cock of the pipes, which communicated with the
liquor vats, and in a very short time the running of the pipe
at the still had ceased. The officers of the Excise then
called upon both the Messrs. Smith upon the subject, and
expressed their determination to ascertain whether there were
any concealed pipes. For this purpose they had the ground
opened, and on this being done the course ofthe pipe was very
distinctly and clearly traced. It came down to a sink which
was opposite spirit vat No. 8. At the bottom of the pipe
over the sink there was a . screw cock. The pipe then
returned and went through the distillery. The Learned Cou-
nsel then illustrated his meaning by referring to the model.
When they came to the corner they discovered a pipe, which
ran off towards the rectifying premises, they discovered that
a communication had been made by means of a hole being
cut in the pipe and a branch pipe inserted there. The pipe
was then carried on by the side of the rectifying premises,
and was distributed among the various vats in the rectifying
store. Now this branch was not entered by Mr. George
Smith in any part of the description of the premises furnished
by him. Ile represented to the officers that the pipe commu •
Meeting with the distillery was connected with the main of
the East London Water Works—a statement which was ut-
terly untrue, though it was a remarkable circumstance that
the two sets of pipes were almost side by side. And
further, that this being 'a . private pipe, laid down in 1836,
there were put on some of the cocks the initials of the East
Louden Water Works. It appeared on Inquiry that
the piping was laid down - at the .request -Of
the Siessts. Smith, in 1836, and he should be
preparsd to show that they had paid for it. Whatever
might be the intention, the Excise officers had not
the slightest notion of there being any under-ground
pipe conveying water, and capable of conveying any-
_ thine. else from the distillery to -the rectifying house.
Suelti being the aisle the officers were instructed to ascertain
whether it was possible to convey spirits from the rectifying

COURT OF BURGESSES.
(THIS DAY.)
WEIGHTS AND MEASURES. G
A Court of Burgesses was held this morning at the lir.
hall, Westminster, before Mr. Lightfoot, the
Smedley, High Bailiff, and the Town-clerk and a full jail':
The Annoyance Jury having given in their presnlo„:
tent
persons fined for defective weights and measures, he tbl
mg appeal came before the Court
Dr THE MATTER OF M. P. DAVIS, OF ST. IgARTIN,9,B„,t4t,Sf-saiti
Mr. EDWIN JAmEs, who appeared for the aPPe""-A been
that his client, Mr. Davis, of 63, St. blartin'a-laue, ba" "for
amerced by the Annoyance Jury in the sum of,.4°.3Lgies)
dealing with false weights," and so on. He air' on,
was aware that there was no legal appeal from that decision'
and therefore he wished to know precisely in wbatd rhsat be
he stood before the Court. Mr. Davis apprehend, deei-
had been summoned there to show cause against tila''_flec-
sion, and he had in Court then a great number of mostrare-in
table witnesses to prove that the Annoyance Jur,' vations
error. He (Mr. James) merely threw out these obser Die
to ascertain from the Chairman the exact standing
client in that Court. A go tle
The CHAIRMAN thought that the case leee-.1,- eror.
further, as he was of opinion that the jury were acconi•
Since the last day on which that Court had sat, he'
panied by the Town-clerk, had visited Mr. Davis's_69,liit the
merit and inspected the scale in question, and be this
error into which the jury had fallen arose from this but it
stance, that the scale vibrated to one side or the ctbert;r:ii the
they had placed the weights in it, they would 113"
equilibrium perfect. He was convinced there 'l%l'l
tional fraud or carelessness on the partDitY'l4.ll. paw°
The foreman of the Annoyance Jury said that TheY
himself had admitted the incorrectness of tile 5c310011611
had tried other scales of a similar construction ar,d
ng
correct. un-
w
Mr. JAMES said that a discussion with the ac°,l".
seemly and indecorous, and what he would wS,n Ally or
He had not been instructed to charge the jury 01 cetAble
tentional error, but Mr. Davis had borne a nlost r,e„s,P,e fort/
character as a tradesman for had nus-
years, ant
witnesses to prove the error alleged against the Jur.
.;tied tbe
lie
The CHAIRMAN repeated that he bad himself ex-el'"
scale, and found' it as correct as it could possiblybe; then
tb°
The foreman sald that if Mr. Davis were let oft, ,
other parties had been fined most unjustly. caies trir
The CtrAmmax—Then you ought to have the 9remittew
in a business-like manner.—The tine was of course
y.)

------ , ',-
CRIMINAL COURT.-(11110 -
0)
OLD COURT. CRIB`v
(Before Mr. Justice WILLIAMS and'Mr. Justice as poor
ADMINISTERING POISON AT .UXBRIDOE.--Than:,diClej gry,
Dickman, aged 19, described as a baker, Iva: '' piclogier
feloniously and maliciously administering to Naryt to tnur,:.
his wife, a large quantity of oxalic acid, with inte,':,iiltf,' 0,-
her. The prisoner had pleaded that he was "11(151r. oa
Mr. Robinson appeared for the prosecution, lug he P'*
a
son for the prisoner.
The facts of the case app e-ti
ten days, and must be fresh in the recollection c 4 gr. Jo' ere
The case for the prosecution broke down, rijoner• r. '11?600
Williams directed the jury to acquit the Prir„nge to P°.
was another indictment against him for atten'lPLl-'
0. nort,
eared in The Sun wit
ourh-in rei ade.,cei.
his child ; on this also he was acquitted.
described as a footman, pleaded guilty
. forgiptg
tao de,eafrsoto
Thomas Griffiths, aged 21, a genteelly-dressed yorludilelitterd
guilty to
ing an order for payment of 101., with integ" alga-
Messrs. Barnard and Co.. the bankers, and w 39 -
be transported for fifteen years.

BOW-STREET.—(THIS r
William Barkhouse Iltartin Darl;ea•t
rl5
landlord of the Coach 8.1. Dr its
aa—nri—ddJHo—honsemsenvt;PcbdteAirie,Y„ptd,'"Lioilat°
sting a disturbance, and assaulting him °g;;., brot's,, the
evening. The evidence of the landlord and t';',ireviouh'ottle
to the effect, that about eleven o'clock the niV"recl A in
defendant Martin came into his house, and °rcitle, PlestelY
of soda-water, for which he gave a fourPl ijramed' oce
payment. lie was very tipsy at the time, an a thilartio
after he demanded change, asserting that it in:'o, trocic
he had tendered. On the landlord refl.'s'
assailed him with the most horrid imps ecation,+ the is
at him over the bar, giving him a severe blow ref doe'be-
Ins fist. The landlord then pushed him clu
doing which the other defendant, Barbb?utse'the soti"
hind, and thrust him (the landlord) also This of iS
Barkhouse then raised a stick he had in „oh en'_tsble
struck the prosecutor a severe blow, with the %ce.coocit.
over the head, laying bare his scalp• Tbe levd the set
on the beat came up at this juncture, an °lliad beeProtiell
a second blow was descending. Barkhouse the site
bar drinking with two women at the time of, deo!
0 °latter• to
with Martin, and seemed a companion of tb f r booor
Mr. HALL said it was too serious a case,: sessi°,3sitter
summarily with it. He must send
littwtt2;sllLishbatthperelisso;,.•
the prosecutor, however, expressing
might be disposed of at once, as he did rel, no a sl.ll use
j 3
charge at the Sessions, the Bench consentea„i,havn,lri;ttec
conviction, and Barkhouse, in consideration aLl'ose of t,
the stick, was fined 51., or a month in the n
tion ; Martin 3/., or in default, three weeks'

ober of
deaths,
sRTdAt
ingL:ITY
the week
.iltE MenEdTinagorsoaLtiusr.---:;--heyleit:r.
iit;,ills:
1,011, buring 28 below the winter average,o flot 351(0- •
however, an increase in several cases uutleF tn , ,i/33
~
diseasesna‘v,"lva-!eiaaevlt e;
a ogsmall
ee-iPnogl xu
nr4ge2iP analmeasleseetiv et IhYe 130:31C:21:19(si $(1)1id. 'irre-I:cli I:irt:i itit'lL 1:3:
diminution. with
gne24. exceptionArrhme(m(g)
deathsf bronchitis,the I.firviolent
from
tt
dihi
see
atr et
iiiiisiss
elf 47
41;sfertir:eitei3d,e../45,;
I murder, and 9 from burn 4 and scalde.s. 064%.
deaths from small- pox occurred at the follovvil!t);5-1u '
eight under 1 year ; eleven 1-3 ; tA 3-:) ; eig, cesrs'
four 10-20 ; six 20-30 ; two 30-40 : and one 4'
j

distwithinguished
,efiefsfulionneewss p___.--.............--------ersons
honouredDrury.
qourits, Marquis
drquiMs ---------- 1104111
ROYAL, DRURVIANE• lanes
tIlleoc:
--The f.° atro
their
aeotilifal
Marchioness
ennct
hAc
oieLoesn
DTuaensadjaydeslas....;....t,irtho
ewpitulle eery,s 013;atiri
iaTtinHtske:
__l Pembroke, Earl of'nn i Mare t;erl
March'
Keilmansegge, Count de .Nouialle,. Lords 111°'llfea
'Marchionessienosgsnbsadnna3ti,e,
Ei
)9,o:orurifig
FIL figftn,z
bdcao;
r,
dal:11,0;14,c
c:i:
iii
tereagh, Ranelagh, Duplin, Paget, the ,-`,;r'r chi-,
-!t_msahblaoojrugott,rnSetvvhsisrehollgittu,e7xtryajWoreßbnbne,haCina,pctacillnunaenlacol‘yferFish.ooerp
Henryan Baring, Sir John Lowther, Bart.. 0•,,,,,001er
BY I :II 07: :RCA:. syryE:
88:
of EhiT:DLTubs —. ---i
spittingn ewiroi:n i:bioltify if:
,i;illn
`rant I If i o-,lrin
it
tilitepehofteerrl:9
,s ?iv:li
itt6:s:,
,trijochkniss,hrnaeaanndd-gwacealieeral weakness of
ins, tbhensisdeecsnsnudffefirtianPggaboilliranvfuculloufsru°lo6(o3olo,:edir
not expected to live three mouths, when ands by theo
the use of Holloway's wonderful Pills,
t 70,3 ~,el.l
t..
means alone, he is now as strong, as bsile' 81) j i/ °ll3
ever he was in his lift..—Sold (also o°lloo olloici:,f;
ment) at the Establishment of Professor .5) and out
244, Strand (where advice may be had grattihr'o4o
almost all respectable vendors of medicine
he civilised world.
of Othnetßheev3.osth.cu.ltilaiatanL,BaunifslaidoTdwallau:phlteeeer. t' Of
Crem ' Wes Bath'
tbe
(OS 1
On ro4
. ell Neil-
utrlinee,3ooftahauuult.., at Dartrey, county of biongbilii'
On the 2d inst., at Isabel-place, Cateberw
Mrs. Joseph Thomas Millard, of a son., fsckt
host', Pin'
On the 2d inst., the wife of Andrew "..,oug-- be,.
of a son.
Martin,
o n
th el
31st
ofui
ult.,
, saotn A daegb`if,
On the 3d inst., at Herne-hill, blrs. Haresll, of ,„,is, of
the o'''
On the 3d inst., ia Hyde-park•sq, - the
•re of t
thew' It
f 1 osel)
Rev. Robert Collins, f a daughter.
West-end,
ilarapstead,
lady °
On the Ist inst., 'at Blackheath-park , the .10
f illi°
Underwood, Esq of a von.
On the Ist inst., in Harrington-square, the la"' ° s,
Henry Wyatt, Esq., of a daughter, still-born. ~ the gef•
~.
On the 1,,t inst. at Winchester, the wife 01 *-
A 0 of Q.
of a daughter. Savoy, the 13".'
On the 2d inst., in Lancaster place,
E. Michele, Esq., of a son.
411-411.1i11.,11. Vober'c'sve_l69ert'
On the 3d inst., at St. John's, Horton,
co, the yoccp
Esq., barrister- at-law, of Manchester, to Fran..
Loon..
tool
daughter of George Sow icr, Esq. surgeon, (2...,, Nottlore-
On the 3d inst., at Trinity 'ChUrdi,. Just,. whieLl
B!acknian, only daughter of Mrs. 131911' '
hill, to Thomas Jones, of Southagate.
_town, 11.
D.1.P3)- Calacv
On the 26th ult., at Camden Cottag,ce, -ell
i en Pe"
Bashall, Esq., aged 86. Sle:' ,j
en
the 28th ult., at Boyden Ball, licr?._ _a„.
Lys, F.,1., son of the late C'olonel Lys, of Ala d•
s,oit,r,
oOrni the 219th. ult., W. Ni‘i[t.tdtta,
iefit,,heoi(.l..}l4.tigil.:;, onver .•• •
st inet., at y e, 5 f thel3te
Esq., of the Exeisa.
On the 16t lest... at 11:uxwell liall, :‘,,..1.1-..,l:clict v 6 Oil'
Henry G. 1, kg., tif `..3crutoti ti till, ; i ~i.etior-plec '
On the 2(1 inst., air. William Phelps, Q 1 i'
worth, aget.l6s. ~ a Of
-"`-'-.----
London : Print,A. an ' oftic 1
No. 112, 1-tt.ltn,l. ?ratter .tr l',, - iii to 1,0,
S-rand. in ;:-_, I;
M i,ld3esva: Thur:;:a-ly'l,l2'Fbe---Ilisrfbc::::;b6T4,:11!j11111' a .e(;):.1:11::)it'lf