The Sun.
London, England, 1845-03-10 00:00:00

inst. nine Cantonal Deputies—namely, Glaris, Zug, St.
Gall, Friburgh, Uri, Outer Appenzell, Schaffhousen,
Neufchatel, and Argau, spoke in succession. No new
opinions were elicited. On the sth there was no
sitting. The discussion was renewed on the 6th, of
which we have not as yet received any report.
The Paris Constitutionncl contains the following:—

"At the sitting of the Diet on the 3d, M. Neuhaus, the
deputy for Berne, moved the appointment of a Committee to
frame propositions that would reconcile as much as possible
the tenour of the different instructions given to the deputies,
and to examine the questions of the free corps and the
amnesty.' On the 4th the representatives of the two parties
into which the Diet is divided engaged in angry personalities.
It was believed that the Committee proposed by ➢I. Neu-
haus would be agreed to."

Madrid journals of the 2d inst. have been received.
They contain no facts of importance, but various
rumours. A Carlist outbreak was expected, according
to the Clamor Publico. A letter in that journal
states that the conspiracy lately discovered at Vit-
toria was amongst the Carlists. Every day emissa•
ries of that party passed through Bayonne on their
way to St. Jean de Luz, where they held their
meetings, and, according to the writer, there was
every probability that a Carlist outbreak would occur
early in spring in the northern provinces. A strong
opposition was expected in the Chamber of Deputies
against the Bill fur the restoration of the unsold
Church property.
The Three per Cents. closed at 35 at 60 days ; the
Five per Cents. at 25i at 60 days; and the Debt
without Interest at at 60 days.

The debate in the French Chamber of Peers on
the Secret Service Money Bill terminated on Friday,
after three days of stormy discussion. That Chamber
it more remarkable even than the British House of
Lords fur its staid demeanour, observance of pro-
propriety, and dignified proceedings. Last week,
however, all rules were broken through—the House at
one time was in the most ungovernable uproar, per-
sonalities were retorted, defiances thrown out, and
almost open challenges given in presence cf the
President, Duke I'ASQUIER. The discussion on this

question had been personal throughout. On the first day
both Count MOLE and M. GUIZOT seemed to depart from
their usual conduct in this respect, and speak only
against each other. Next day Count SALVAM)Y, who is
regarded as a renegade by some, a political character

the most fitted to create disturbance in a free assem

lily, because he is respected by neither party, again
attacked Count MOLE, sato in a fit of high passion
exclaimed, " After what I have just heard from the
Minister of Public In:truction, I am tempted rather
to pity him than to reply," which roused other
speakers, till the President, with the unanimous con-
sent of the Chamber, was compelled to reprove the
most noisy by calling him to order. It may be in-
teresting, however, to give a brief outline of the

scene. DI. SALVANDY, who was appointed
Minister of Public Instruction, on the illness of M.
VILLEMAIN, attacked Count MOLE ho, by the way

appears to have been for some time in a feverish
state of excitement, and does not at all like to be
classed with M. TIIIERS' party). After adverting to
the policy of CASIMIR PERIER and others, he came
to that of Count MOLE, and said :
" He should not characterise the policy which was opposed
to that of the Conservative party; he should merely remark
that two or three Cabinets had more or less inclined towards
that policy, and he would ask all those who had watched the
progress of affairs' what traces those administrations had left
behind them—what pages they had written for history—
what, iu fine, had been their character ? Their whole course
might be summed up in those words—a short duration, an
existence without.strength, a renown without glory.—(Hear,
hear.) And why, he would ask, was this ? Because those
ministries had no point of support—because they did not de •
pond on the great interests of order and conservatism, the
first elements and indispensable condition of all govern-
ment. He had been accused of inconsistency, because at
another period he had differed in opinion from the present
Cabinet on the subject of a word spoken in the Chamber of
Deputies ; but why should such a question have raised
up a barrier between the Cabinet and himself, when the
Crevernment never fbr a moment contemplated making it
a Cabinet question, and when even it would not have
taken any part in the deliberation but for the initia-
tive taken by a Member of the other Chamber.
Was there any reason to tremble for the morrow? Was
there, he would ask, any appearance of war abroad, or at
home could they perceive the slightest symptoms of uncer-
tainty or agitation in the public mind? What pretext, then,
could there be to divide the miorit)' and place the Govern-
merd, in other hands? Was it believed that the Conserra-

tive interest was so weak, that it could be so capriciously di-
♦ided, thait it depended on one man, however great his as-
cendancy, to sow disunion in its ranks? What would be-
come of the Government on the day of such an eve. t?
What would become of the standard of Casimir Puler?