The Sun.
London, England, 1845-07-18 00:00:00

IMPERIAL PA. A
ROUSE OF LORDS, July 17.
'The Lordships met at Five o'clock.
The Constables Public Works (Ireland) Bill, the Deg
stealing Bill, and the Draina:7e by Tenants for Lite Bill, were
severally read a third time and passed.
On
the motion of Lord CAMPBELL, the Defamation and
.Libel Act Amendment Bill was read a third time and passed.a Lorgd BROUGHAM presented a petition from Lord Sondes
,ill, the the Oxford, Woreever, and Wolverhampton Railway

DUBLIN AND G ALWAY RAILWAY.
B_,lhe Earl of BESBOROUGH brought up the report of the
tic:et Committee appointed to inquire into certain aeg,a-
_liaitsiseehtoich had been made against the Dublin and Galway
visa waY Company, The Committee had only thought it ad-
go into the allegation respecting the forgery of four
!lames to the subsolintion-deed of the Company, and they as-
;rained that the Company had been in the habit of making
ppattnents TA' shares without obtaining any references as to the
ti;speetability or status of the applicants. They also lipped
th •
en. report, and the petition containing the allegations,
be referred to the Committee which was now
'adag Upon the BM. It was not his intention to
Tse the second reading of the Bill, which was appointed for
these
evening or to raise any discussion at present respecting
fut.! allegations, as ample opportunity would be afforded, on a
...re occasion, for that purpose.
B,OLn osrd
'-'ROUGHAM thought it much better that no discus-
' af hould arise on the subject at present.
andoter a short consultation the Bill was read a second time
T. rdered to be committed.
Turne. T•nclostare of Lands Bill, the Loan Societies Bill, the
tod?P:ite Acts Continuance Bill, the Highway Rates Bill,
at, 'he Unlawful Oaths Bill, were severally read a first time,
lordered to be printed.
dThe Marquis of CLANRICARDE wished to put a question
ane of the Ministers of the Crown in reference to the con-
_cteitri f
o' a magistrate and deputy. lieutenant of the county of
ro.
tie The
Duke of WELLINGTON—You should have given no-
Your question.
L,4ne Marquis of CLANRICARDE said he would put his
estion then tomorrow. It would relate to the conduet of a
ows, -Watson, a magistrate and a deputy-lieutenant of the
-"Y of Leitrim, who had taken an active part in the Orange
coup "lags and processions which had lately taken place in that
t,.
LANDLORDS AND TENANTS (IRELAND) BILL.
to„ e Nlarquis of LONDONDERRY, who hadnot th- good
the`aee to be present on Tuesday evening when the Noble Lord
ecretary for the Colonies st'ated his intentions with respect
I°.otrhrie Landlords and Tenants' Bill, would be glad if the Noble
int would state clearly and ttistinctly whether Government
I:Med proceeding with the measure in the preset session.
baVeinNoble Marquis then presented a numb-r o• petitions from
litrudinu_isst
tphlaeces in Antrim, Belfast. Londonderry, and Down,
Bill, signed by landowners and others, and can-
fneu,hY imploring the N. ble Lord to withdraw the Bill.
oat u STANLEY regretted that the Noble Marquis was
Btli
the House when he made a statement wilh respect to the
bi
d_ I!. was not his intention to ask the House to pass the
4D,.!,nlng the present session.
C.:OGNIZANCES FOR COSTS OF BILLS BILL
Vih °l'd BROUGHAM slid. as it had not yet been determined
bell ether the order with regard to costs in rail say Bills should
fleeted by a Bill or not he should I.ostpone the second
nfi of this Bill until to-morrow. The Noble Lord ex-
taaeti'js' nis regret that a Bill (the name of which he did not
,11)°a) had been read a third ti me before five o'clock, during
Miyi senor, from the House. By it a poor clergyman, who had
Of ',brig of 701. a year, and who kept a school within forty yards
*Ne route of the railway, would he nearly ruined, a: no one
ktio then send their children to his scheol. What compen-
e.rould the Railway Company give him for so great a loss?
REDESDALE cited the case of a person who
dettre nded 1,0001. upon a building, which wouldbe greatly
Qta.ted by a railway passing within ICO yards of it.
tom"..„RE GLASGOW JUNCTION RAILWAY.
atked,"ALHOUSIE presented a petition, numerous'y
kote—rs'irorn Glasgow, against this line, on account of its pro-
AU intending to carry it along the Quays.
TUAL SURRENDER OF CRIMINALS BILL.
billa Earl of ABERDEEN moved the third reading of this
,aaWhieh he said was to fac lit: to the mutual delivering up of
11;114ls between France and the United States.
‘ Theßill
was read a third time and passed.
ttetl: third reading of the Public Works (Ireland) Bill was
proposed and carried, and the House ajourned.

Tee
ROUSE OF CO(ILTIONS, .July 17.
sae 1.1
Tes also
met at Twelve o'clock.
ese,r highway Ra es Billll
eSeti"e also the Militia Ba o,
w+sassr,eisardenastiohnird time and passed ;
Vrer Bill, the Turnpike Acts Bill, and the Unlawful fLunlaOnaStho;
ca.,ud) Bill.
TisLt SIASTICAL PATRONAGE (IRELAND)
the Bill was ordered to be
te%;,4e report was brought up, and BILL.
' a third time to-morrow.
reading of
this
Bill.
oved the third.
mINCLOSRE BILL.
enport •
eerThle tirloCf OLAIINICI(O)NLNS
4c be el SIBTHORP protested againsthste athßartllmoafrtkhei,si iits
pro._
greaa,.°eirtg proceeded with with the a
Nllsen„ Re knew it was useless to contend against alegaasitnshtlytheehdeeetrekrpmreti..-
„e of the Government, but ithmegh
the House was fully a -
4414(14 that portion of the day
114 '4litcl not when the Membvieresthveerße
islul,reautodbefew's
oee; ". R. YORKE supported
Ainer/ useful measure. believed it to
144asi . /.IA,II.MAN CRAWFORD opipuodse(edd,thteheßseilleaosmazeiinuo-sr
eof the rights of the poor.
!11..en inclosed and the value of tuh;edmhaforrembeedettinst
Jest' setefit of the poor, there . onma e fund
eat oi
it
to increase
15.14,7 t fr it,
.and some utility migwhot. have fotlhloewperdo,rebruty,o f
het, ryas evidently attemptan.e
ation, or for
iropriated for recre of the
tee, ,there was no evidene out of the 10,000,600 o
Ills, l land any of it would be api
tberliseuts for the benefit of theor .poor.
thee" Was the very poorest
made the people
spoorhou should
who
ee
resorted consideredt e
peor°ll3lllnons. It was not theh tion of theet
e0wet4441,001111
as ftvoer
ust,ur pboer tt. that
h t these
eatottll at because those who adetromotohner meansresorted to thech
haerdoebujes_ctiwonhatt a.if
su
turnedi tinto potato-gardens--what tile:too -t,
foi,- 'lle case ? It was better for tutedgesppiortiattoo-fgtauredepnesertou,
abr.ief
40,41 than that the independence
Ntsh,,h be broken (town. He shoulad
oefonatefunuddthfoart tthheelraenhdesieir
oe at all, should become the seurcde
to I:,;elent of the poor, for he believe
he ahoejeeted from their allotments without,recompense; them
audt
i t wil
would
behardfnr
that istlid, therefore, divide the House on the motion being pu
iti "Is Bill do pass.
stood so high, both
ie anger
for Rochdale (Mr. S.
.Criawf7sr
Ale '.
14. n• DENISON said that thede)haracter of the Hon.
for this Hill. He him
1., 'nit of the House, for km( cops consideration or the peor,
self e was anxious to secure lets ote
trl,nteeived that it was
thie- wages ana means ofAesma-
ployl4), Iseneficial . in inci•easit?ge
eon
~
of the highest utility and likely to
chairman of quarter-sessions,
eisai.teut, and in enproving tri . i 1 ti or of the poor.
he fia,ate, and occasionaliy as ss e had . many opportun
ery persons
Nno lived on the edges of corm mons were the v b
Ines of ascertaining that those pe
evil, and he should
emuthese/. that it would tend to save
these/. °NI give it his warmest support, and he thanked the Go-
,rit.inesit fir its introduction.
hp d saved him the.
l'•rs ',Earl of LI COLN said that t.he s esich of his. Hon.
te,,,..•4`4 the Member for West Yorkshire ,
ence .
Nt-Is'itY of entering into any elaborate d.(af '
h statement of his
Ilso"e vras anxious' to say one wore., uponl
1 gee
been hurriedly
iltlshedaild Gallant Friend f the Bill.
the ei "'rough the House. *
been several
bet attl°oB made in it—("
ehtr reuse for three yeses. There had certainlyfrom
it7ltiethßsplB,4lllad in fact been bsfore
hear," Col. SibtherP)--
he • liem 8111 n its present state
' discus.
hours
liQ j! threee mouths. There had been sixteen
debate on its
4 ill
- .
Hear,
had been under notice for
Itsrthees °Mralttee, and one
..
Hon. Member
discus-
f°ffile. With regard to the objection of the .
„chi,. „„., -eas to the allotments ti elebelal
that was
lele e•-", for the advantage of the. : pobeNr,
those who
llrek,•"Y first consideration entertaincul .
its provisions.
eod pared the Bill, and adopted .
was ntnaeesas to the observation respecttint.g the remuneration for
ti nor" aed growing crops, the
prepared, and now
Pose 3 and after the Bill had beenninreiasdsinanthird time, he pro-
kaele . ntroduce a rider, which hehad
allowedhand. He trusted,
to Dacs
"14hi
theeefore, that the Bill would
4tthe lII' • ' * third time,
ed. • Was then read a and the rider was
1114,..thee motion that the Bill do pass,
feel it his duty
treesi 'RARMAN CRAWFORD said there was no distinct
'vrelp,,•°ll 10r
allotments, and he should therefore
A, St-rd his opposition 'to the Bill, by.
House
‘u'idaneßere were then ordered to withdraw, and
dividing the
the House
''
e,' woen there appeared-
-48
"'the emotion -
0
Against it
The
~111 . Majority
" thers passed.
BILL.
ssOeth DRAINAGE OF LANDS .
ee thi Rothe DRAINAGE that the House reso
.1111 Rill,
lilt s'°°,l SIBTHORP stated that he had more objection to
lye itself into Committee
briogio . an the former, andhe .
-"1
11' 1-
LThe it oh was exeeedinely ill-timed.
t object
`t• it,
ssi!ri of LINCOLN' •as assured that the Gallant Mem-
-4 it,°- "'coin had not read the Bill or he would no
The ,
diskre.."ouse then went into Committee on
verbal amendments,
and th"et clauses were agreed to with a few
at Twelve.
the Bill. The
IsejssiAreleort was ordered to be read to-mo
All' -TIG ASYLUMS AND PAUPERrroLUNATICS
u the ee BILL.
1,-;','• H. tnjog pb,°n that this Bill be teed a third time,.
.g the asy-
r-ce a. s'erskELEY moved to insert the foltowin proviso,
-net soWss agreed to .
hoes, tleelaree ioa " P-ovided always that in cabee a
work.
Nei, fitt shall be law itil for the said Secretary of State,
de.q—uate o'r unfit as aforesaid shall
if he shall
Lela eel% es
°vete ' °Pon the application in writing of the guardians or
~ et the use •
diti um, or of
th ion or parts
ad-
Isisj°,4 building: major of them, to direct suchfore-
h to whom such workhouse shall
pahrt dditional asylum
keer'a :° be erected or err
such
d additional
the said guardians" aover-
kuti ell" every suehPwnorikheousey which shall be so andrded to,
or
Prt;itive.4rY such additional ast lum which shall be erecteddtebe a
tatiat,:' as last aforesaid *shall be and be
thew as as
for such count'y or borough,
aAct ; and
it h,`, In and shall be subject to the provisions of this
seeC"d be lawful for the guereians or overseerrse
to whom
and shall be in-
‘tiseor:eetlon shall be given, and they hereby
asuch sum or
a4ll f 41 t° apply, or to as ens, raise, and tr°lll a°,,TioneY as may be necessary fur the levy
purposesnes as are
tolen hycl funds, fir by such powers, ways a.nd
poorer an/ belonging or given to or vested in su Inceh guardians
aforesaid
era specially • gl'ite 11 •
or the ra y , or. In etee wa
J, In relation to the purchase or hiring. "'.
h eh wardens or overseers of the
noskh_Purehase, building, hiring, enlarging, or maintaining of
heulges.”
13 th 111 Was then read a third time.
Sir e 'stollen that the Bill do pass, '4IIIehj`INIES GRAHAM moved to withdraw the 6th clause,
era%
aexempted the poi elous parishes of Marylebone, Sc, ran-
it. Zl,Bt- George, horn the eperetion of the Bill.
of
the eia "ARLES NAPIEIt objected to the withdratiweau?
set
Itith slit"- There was no rr.:•!roiWi`an Member in the
I,he ihe exception of himself, and he certainly must. say that'
leleatertio the clause, if it was now to be withdrawn,
goose
had
mach like an intention to deceive them, for no
the etuad been given to any of the metropolitan Members of
Is.‘ll%,.elnion on the part of the' Government to withdraw the
Sie
versooe GRAHAM defended the course pursued by the Go-
tomtit and insi,ted on the rejection of the clause.
et the- ASHLEY said when be consented to the introduction
sieeredelause, he stated that its provisions must be well con-
!llse% '
„and the propriety of its remaining in the Bill could be
utventseku, ort the third reading. For his own part, he was
111,..au,,1e to the clause.
eoeseje;.lENLY s'lpported the withdrawal of the clause,
tin on- IN that as it at present stood it would operate entirely
Lord 7slde.
ttlesl:l-INCAN said if this clause was to be retained. he
the Apove the adjournment of the House. His Hon. Friend
to th 'other for Montrose had entirely withdrawn his opposition
1..,04 Bill or
the ground of the introduction of the clause.
stro,e Jib
I:t.SEILEY had stated to the Hon. Member for Mon-
'tniii .44 on the third reading of the Bill the propriety of.re-
%elf ttZ the clause would be discussed ; that he thought him_
fed rere.svere great objections to it, and that probably on the
e4r reading iWould be necessary to withdraw it.
or let: ARRTON trusted the Noble Lord the Member
.0,.•-ci ,Zroupr in his motion. . .
the
kIiatL'UNCAN said he would not persevere in moving
•-"ellt,