The Sun.
London, England, 1845-11-22 00:00:00

BREAD.

The prices of WheatenThTead in-the metropolis are from
Sid to 10d; of Household ditto, 7d to 9d per 4lbs loaf.

HIDE MARKET.

Market Hides, 561 b to 64th, 24aii;(71 per lb 641 b to
721 b, 3d to ; do. 721 b to 80th, 3id to aid; do. 30lb to
881b,31(1 to 4d. ; do. 881 b to 961 b, 4d to 4id ; Calf Skins, each,
3s 9d to 7s; Horn Hides, 13s ; Polled Sheep, 3s to 3s 6d ;
Half-breds, 2s 6d to 3s 4d; Downs, 2s 4d to 2s 9d; Lambs
28 7d to 2s. 10(1.

hor,
daughier, had died before coming of age and the ler!.
lion Mrs. Tesehemaker, bad appeared to have 'the daughtteb Pr,
the effect of the Dutch in and to tbe
Paid over to her. His Honour ordered it,quiry nextl°
law Demerara, as
of kin.
7 nit LONDON AND SOLITII-WESTF,RN NAILWAI:.at the
d This petition prayed, on behalf of this Compaw, tin cash,
eposit of 35,0004 in Excheauer Bills, and 6621. I.Bs. , ver
made according to Act of Parliament might ROSY be paid °
to them. The order was granted.
IN ISIS PRESTON IMPROVEMENT ACT. - „of
This petition on the part of the Vicar, prayed the paYal-.or,
certain c )sts incurred preliminary to to the s-de 01
age, in terms of the Act of Parliament, which directceht!,,
payment of incumbrances on lands out of the pure,
_2l,v;
money. His Honour thought the . petitioner shotdd I:113s,
claimed out of the investA fund, as against the C.q the
sioners, and could not therefore make order in terns 0
petition. tl:c vi.
..„3

1141..)
QUEEN'S BENCH.---(THIS.-, ace' g
The eat ly part of the day was occiaikd in hearlng.,o are
upon a bill of exchange, which, it was contend!d 000
One side was a valid bill, passed for a considela
co tien
me ",
the oilier that it ceased to be a debt, having
operation of the statute of limitation.
EX PARTE SIR JAMES SOUTIL vela
Counsel on behalf of Sir James South moved toLverfer
nisi for a criminal information against Captain 11,,ace,
111
writing a letter tending to provoke a breach of the 14116 ocute
affidavit of Sir James stated that in October lat' oohed,
some letters to the Times newspaper, which were Sod
and which called public attention, and that of time
_op&
ciety, to the fact that the names of several pr...uoittee!,
been published as belonging to -the Provisional c.,0,4..g,5.
of certain Railway Companies, and having the letters iiv,vor.
affixed to them, to which they had no client h 0
Amongst those was the name of Captain Grover, when
th
in a letter to the Times that he was a fellow. 11rota to
matter in public terminated, Cap!ain
Sir James a friendly letter, in which ,11.'liotice'
plained that he had done him an act et tbel
This letter Sir James did not answer, 810 treated teritiiireu
Grever,i_w one
which followed with silence also ; but the thud cTotioe,
the language which had given rise to the preseast,,,,ial,
such as cowardly knave," &c. The Counsel then nil oil
the Court at great length upon the impropriety r:, consr
language from one gentleman to another, and t• t
quences that were likely to follow it. ore& to
Lord DENMAN, in giving judgment, said it aPPoceptP,
• him that there had been a great deal of ndsecle,,idean/
upon both sides. The object of Sir James was under
the
to hold up certain parties to public observation n, no e.
circumstances stated ; but as those letters containe(clolo.oll
gation of misconduct, they did not warrant
,a „1:1.0yerroo
personalities. It was quite evident that -0) bk.).
used language in his letters which he (LordVetniai,cove,;
doubt lie would upon reflection very much regret. 1„.- yoel;
the Court did not think the circumstances sach ads yips]; he,
thero%dliTA
warrant it in granting the application, and
means of keeping up ill-feeling. It was therefore hops
the matter would end here, and that no more Woul
about it. net
• BUSINESS OF THE COURT. " an we!,
The days fixed for taking up the special PaP— r
trial paper, and for giving judgment, .are as follose.., side
nesdav, Dec. 3 ; Thursday, Dec. 4 ; Friday. Dec.. Joel;
day, Dec. 6; Monday, Dec. 8 ; Tuesday, Dec. 9, ' for
day, Dec. 10 ; and Thursday, Dec. 11. First oTa.,Yge 11.
Prius Wednesday, Nov. 26 ;- last day, Thursdaio
kl. 1
BAIL COURT.—(THIS
(Sittings in Banco.)
EX PARTE THE PARISHIONERS OF WA..."1,151'18
Mr. BAYNES applied for a rule to show cause vole' silic
damns should not issue commanding the Rev. SanotrYli,
vicar of the parish of Wakefield, to enter on t,ueoctebergeit
cords an adjournment of a vestry meeting °I fAti_ke,
The Learned Gentleman stated that on the ]Dili of.riPt6
notice was given that a meeting of the parishione7tirchip
field, to take into consideration the nicking of? c the P 5140
would be held. The rate was to be made lor
„hicb co
church of Wakefield, and also for another chareb4sth 01.;•0
maintained under a particular statute under the
and it ti
111. The parishioners assembled on the 14th, hol3
proposed that a rate of one penny in the iid4t,i
levied. Some person proposed that the vest*" s, bilttU
for 12 months, and that proposition was secooae
negatived by a show of hands. After a short discf:ied Woo
vestry decided against the rate. A poll was denniPober.
18th, which poll continued. until the 2d of Sept
that day the vicar declared the poll to be closed. Ad the rf-de
in favour of the rate was declared to be 2,376, r 5 ,oar °
ber against it 2,361, leaving a majority of 15 T`-i. reeelia
rate. During the course of the polling, the y'riorefes:t-of
the votes unassisted by any member of the lega'4
and when any vote was objected to, the vicar innberla le
random of it, saying that it would be entered yon,; ist
He said that such vales and the poll in gene/11,100V
examined by a scrutator. As the poll closed, a
made for a scrutiny, and the vicar declared that nh`e boo't 0
eel
home and count the numbers, and then seal UP !f et
be examined by the scrutator. It was then Porn
where
him that he had in one case inserted only one v°tebers'„ecoi!
ought to be allowed. On his declaring the 11„,ilnn poPtlai
again called upon to grant a scrutiny, andlthahe;:oe:s;:tootlioc::
refused to do so. The proceeding Nyae,,ltiltieiro'reri
scrutiny, wholly incomplete, and the object,7 the Aice:',
tion was to compel the vicar to
steps to render the proceeding complete.
the vicar's proceeding was that no less tlian,,Vsg!,iY
favour of the rate were improperly allowed, an" Ad Aelloior
had been improperly rejected. In fact 115 'to s Air;
been taken, and 41 goad ones rejected. There Ped be et
Stock Company in the parish of Wakefield, e 41,1001.1101
te
and Calder Canal Navigation Company. -4-Fthe
tbertta
Wilkinson, a clerk to that Company, clairnell of
voting on behalf, and entered six votes' in fav°urtutiter,"l°A
although he admitted that he had received
do SO. A station of the Leeds and Manchester
in the- town, and the station-master claimeacti;Ojii
voting on behalf of the company, although baud 6 otereli
he had received no special authority to do so, , t°,6o'
votes. The same circumstance occurred with reba
company, a water company, the trustees of A
tore,
school, and other establishments of a similar fcf„"or,'
there circumstances, it was evident that if a Prep, fs'",
had been made, the majority of 15 would not he 'l;trit"
the rate. There were instances of persons vatit:
of private. partnerships; and, on one occasios,thin° tee
of the West Riding entered six votes, as rePresh% iik,ooll
out-buildings of a lunatic asylum, although "0-se'.lVi,
that be was not one of th visitieg kg' •tb
nor had he even any authority from his brother 1,11_,1 ot el
There could be no question as to the jurisdict;e4A
Court in these cases. It had been held. hY4tt Ikler?oos.;'
Queen's Bench, in the case of the King V. Ise c
Westminster, that although the Court could I.lo'
damns, compelling the parishioners to male 3 c{-
could issue a mandamus to call a meeting of thee TV;
in order to consider the propriety of making a rato,lastd,O,,
was, therefore, plain, that this Court could issue:to to tf.i
calling a meeting of the parishioners of Wakcdell,est !It
opinions on the question as to this rate. A ei-stj'tirt, bet
entered against the rate in the Ecclesiastical Lie- of p",4);':
circumstance did not interfere with the P°,/lort'„
the case under the cognizance of a temporal`
doubt existed as to whether a scrutator -d-orihtl 4
poll, but in this case there could be n° eijok,to
returning officer himself had admitted the
of a scrutiny. He had the power of having 0118„.:0182:6
proper, but as be did not this application WO t—of t
bt hey
AV
view of compelling him to enter an adjournment
from the 14th, in order that the question Infvow-
considered, or to compel a scrutiny of the list o
Application granted. . J°ll' if
THE QUEEN.: V. THE LONDON AND BIEMINGI'^- -0
COMPANY. ff VP 031,14
Mr. BOVILLE applied for a certiorari to hr,in7jriie:rpo
quisition, by :which a deodand was imposed,.'ilrwisi,,tl;teel
might be quashed. It appeared that the ln'h
held on the body of Charles Dean, in the 01°11;gere;
last, and on the face of that inquisition there
its' Ireltrif
fatal errors, which rendered it liable to be (11 . ijefit'a
first was an irregularity in the mode of deseriPllt3cee t
quest had been held at three different places, 81'.,c1-; ,Destgoi
be held to be complete at the last sitt„i'atilY,'Kel'6o
foreman in the verdict had said, " being tiel'heeil
to inquire, &c." That charge must have ~,a ee,;-,ort,flo
the first sitting, and not at time last, 11,V,,,s 0",),
be described by the word " now." The plsc'eervil
were founded on a total absence of allegation
on o'. he tilos
accident was said to have taken place
railway, but the county or parish in wileika plc'reo
railway existed was not mentioned• cerl
was described as moving to the death, striltinttifice•
riages on a railway, but with no allegation ,°' rtetaff:.4,
was also a bad arrangement of sentences in ble. -the ;of
totally disconnected the death from the eat'''' (tea' aeid
of the carriages was entirely separated from the 1,0
Dean. The 6th and 7th Viet , sec. 2, co•
that inquisitions should. not be .114 tlerje
the omission of certain technicalities, wll,le;',li.o-ri
length ; but the errors in the present inntne're ern; oir,
out of the pale of the statute, and were Pie- ods,ter,c2e
it, ,as no indictment for murder or manalatio cite' jies
founded on it. The Learned Counsel then__ MP
authorities in support of his application' tbl
I,,Agr.NocoOt
granted. eft
ie

TDE QUEEN V. EDWARD 3.101 S" t
Mr. PASTILEY moved for an attaclure° coi' py
of I.'l
person of Edmund Marsland, for conteruPt ;,/oe g „ler;
attending as witness before the Revising Ban 580:00`', e'
in the county of Chester, after having
subpoena to do so. This evidence was matt" oe'Ai''
Lion raised against some voter's claim, and '-
his absence the claim had been allowed. 11
Application granted.
EXCHEQUER.—(T lIIS the
(Sittings in Banco.) • • ~0 jr
ati, lie 01
LORD V. simmoNs. ees- t
This was an action brought to recover cninPsdebe bidelev„eo,
shape of damages for a misrepresentation
fendant in respect of a certain school, to vehici,.e It
pleaded Not Guilty, andilhe case was tried
,ntle)er
Platt on the 11th instant at Nisi Prins, "orite.'l to 'eel(
for the plaintiff, awarding him' 1501. damagle alt
Mr. W. 11. WATSON now moved for a ru‘de, gelice'rer
cause why the verdict should not be 5(t.,3-;t evi`ciiitth.;it
trial lute, on the ground that it was eiggn;;,, pit'.ll,goo,ol'
would appear, that some short time ago,
.-,-stetpeic,
ceived an advertisement in the public Prit'isof 000,beik
school was to be disposed of in a beautiful Py 0%010
try, which afforded an excellent opening fora 55 0 ISt 1,0.
who was desirous of commencing businei.oto
master; and directing that enquiries SPd scl•ff,llte
at M. De Porquet's, the French bookseller an laid at PP de
in Tavistock-street, Covent-garden. The rp)liekirl3`3,
anxious to embark in such a profession, ali)inta Tegitrai4
Porquet's, and there learned from a paper V°
'lendant, that the school was situate at Brill,
_live
v
shire. The school consisted of twent'Y eettelete
and twenty-five day scholars, and thg reit' an,
carried on in a very excellent bes.e(leot 0, 105014
fixtures and other conveniences. The defe" tll'At Aett
the reason of his giving up the establishire,litotioe%ig
just succeeded in getting a Post-office apleof/lte
and he could not attend to it; and eventuat;lee
these representations the plaintiff agreed te goeo all op'
Ile paid upwards of 401. for the fixtures o,.nic,itig the bt. 'Pi
establishment, and 1301. for furniture, in' of
but on his going to take possessions ~cceei
lishmertt, he discovered that he had beat "00
defendant, there being only two scholar:4 re'eet
itself being in a very dilapidated state. gethPe prj;et
this to the defendant, but finding be.Cc'', to t-ilefelicee
from him by vhic remonstrance, be was d ve
the r' for
• 11
action, and the jury awarded him that e
51p. vi!
denied him. The Learned Counseb le'
err° ocod 1.o), ‘,l
tended that they had done 50,, t iacel;oo
was cautioned by a former applicant,
it was elicited on the trial that
05 i° tlO
that .si.:oz °lOO.
the impression he entertained of the fleer!iite"defelit,', oleo'
the school; and he was distinctly told bY t,he clertioreo,
the school was in a depressed state, but
Ile theith it
parish would make good the deficiencies..
20 eve', .ot.stil
tended there was no misrepresentation,er deeeivel'otO
was the plaintiff had allowed himself to be lot t
eyes open, and as it was a well known rule Ted), if
having the means of knowledge bad no rell',! be o.l,io!id fo
himself to be deceived, the verdict ought to 4 ce//nPi
Mr. Baron PLATT said he was decidedly the
/Atli
there was gross deception practised upon

~/i ~ i
"f