The Sun.
London, England, 1819-03-19 00:00:00

MOORS V. BOND.

•
- The plaintiff stated, that he was hired by Bond
on Sunday,
,the 28th of February, in the after-
noon, at Perry's Wine-vaults, in the Adelphi,with
many other persons, at ss. per day, to assemble at
the same house next morning, which they did,
and Bond directed ithein to go to Covent-garden,
and place themselves in the front of the Hastings
tor the day, and sing out " Lamb for ever," and
to hiss and hoot when any body cried out for Hob-
house, and if any body gave him a punch on the
head, they were to hit them again ; and when
Mr. Vobbouse spoke, to 'hiss and hoot, to pre-
vent his being heard ; that, after the close of the
poll, they were to return, and he would pay them.
Bond did not come till between seven and eight in
the morning, and said he had been-at a great
many coffee-houses to look for the Committee-man
who-was to provide the money, but could not
find him unless be -went to his house, which ,he
did not like to do, as it would not look well.
Question by the COURT to Bond.--Who was
that person ? •
Mr. Hodgson, the clerk, interposed, and said,
that was not a question for Mr.' Bond to answer,
as it would come before the House of Commons.;
and Sitting n be did, he (the Clerk) was bound
ro protect Bond. Bond told the. Court that the
Committee-man of Mr. Lamb who
.promised to
pay was out of town; and be could not get the
money. •
Plaintiff continued.—Bond offered them on the
Monday night a shilling a-piece in part, and pro-
mised the remainder on the Tuesday morning.—
" We did not take it, but said we would take the
two days together. He said he should have the
money ready, and we might have it before we
went in the morning, or, it we liked, take.both
days together at night. Bond ordered us to be
,at the same public-house in the morning, and to
go to the hustings as before ; but' he did' not

come to paysus as lie promised. Going up to the
hustings we met him ; he said, Go to the hust-
ings, • and I will pay you to-night.' After the
poll, we went to Perry's, and waited there till
10 'o'clock at night, hut he never came, and I then
summoned him."

Bond admitted that be knew the plaintiff, and
that if he had gone to the Brown Belt- on Mot
day last, he would 'have been paid by a gentle-
man of the Committee, who attended there for
that purpose.
By the CouaT to the plaintiff.—Did Bond tell
yon to go to the Browft Bear to be paid ?—No,
he di4 not, for 1 bad not seen him.

- Did, you know lbat,you should have gone there
to be paid ?—I did not.

TheConri ordered Bond to pay the amount of
103. and costs in a month; to which Bond agreed.
* * We have taken the above froth The ,Times
.
of this day, which has properly added the fol-
lowing cant ion :

It is proper to mention, that this account is sent tot $
by one of the most determined enemies of Mr. 1,,..m8'S patiy,
and the most active of Mr. HonnousE's_friends; but as he
assured us that the facts might. be depended ou, we did nut
dunk proper to withhold it trout the Public.7l

PAR LI A %LENT.

HOUSE OF 1,0'? D, MARCH 18.

The (or hi were admiLisiered to the Earl of nn-
Yli,killen and the Earl of Kingston.
Hone proceeded in I)iiito's Divorce 811.
Mr Warren appeared as Conusel for the peti-
tioner. Witnesses were examined, andithe fnr.
titer proceeding %v.'s postponed till Thursday next.
- The Mutiov Bill passed throu4h a Committee.
and Wfl.4 reported witliont amend:neut.—To he
read a third time to-morrow.

The Royal Marine Mutiny Bill was read a Se-
cond time, ant} coin mil Irri for to-tuorrom.
A petition fur a Modification of the Insolvent
Act %vas presented by Lord flolland trona Tower
Ward ; also petitions against the Insolvent Act,
or for a Modification of it, were presented by the
Kati of Shaftesbury, from Spalding anti another
place ; for an equalization of the Duty ots Coals,
by the E.irl of Shaftesbury, from Cordwainers'.
Ward ; and against any alteration in the Duty on
C-,114. by the Eq.! of Yowls, from Shrewsbury—.
all id them were orit.reo to lie upon the table.
A short ctinvet sation took place between Lord
Viscount Sidrnonth and Lord Holland, respec'ing
a oetition presented by ,the latter yesterday nom.
Pciftoed, the former stating that the •numbers
meationt-11 in the petition as haying been capitally
convicted. &c. were greatly exAg et atett (!laugh
lie did not mean to sav intentionally), as appeared
by tiie iloctinvelits upon the 'able. Lorif Holland
said to. would inquire as to how the misconcep-
tion !rid arisen.