The Sun.
London, England, 1828-01-12 00:00:00

.e-ra;4llA KO(TROI

:1 _ail 1,14 7/01 7)Wil \ti
N* initLtro34
DAY:

... ,41
•
.0,,
-"‘ vinLis, V. ?atm-arr.
TattstovE appeared in support of this petition.
NW...minim') said he was Counsel for a Mr. and
) 8. Dickins, who were charged by the petition, and he
";'4 to pray that the petition might stand over, fur his
lead to have an opportunity of answering affidavits that
tad been filed only last night.
Mr. Tamsrovn considered this application as reasonable
as far as related to the Dickins, and assented to it on con-
dition of the Court's making an order for the personal ap-
pearance of those persons on the day on which Mr. Wake-
ilekl thought he would be ready.
Mr. WAXIIFIULD named this day week.
jlisLoanstatv directed it to stand till then, Mr. Wake-
Liwurs clients being to furnish Mr. Treslove's with copies
of their aftidavits two days before the end of the week.
Arr. TRESLOTE wished to know if Mr. Owen Parratt
Was personally in Court, the individual who had married
the Ward, because if be were not, he skould ask fur an
order to commit him.

Mr. PlSPYXnpp;:ed for him, and said he was, and that
1,0 would attend again on this day week.
Mr. TREBI.OVE did not apprehend that the matter was
t4sittind over, as far as he was concerned.
Mr. Pares said, his case was very much connected with
tliat of Mr. and Mrs. Dicking, and he could not conceive
why the one should be gone into before the other.
Air. TRROLOVE said, Mr. Parratt Lad made an affidavit,
and teas therefore to be taken as being prepared to go on
with his case.
Mr. Paeys objected to the case being taken piecemeal.
The Solicitor for Mr. Parrett undertook that he would
Personally appear next week.
flsis Lormetur thought it would be a waste of time to
ear the case as against any of the parties, until it could he
lY gone into, and therefore ordered it to stand over wits
r"Pect to Mr. Parratt also, who was married about a fort-
night ag,
Mr. TaxsLovE then wished to know whether the Court
1"uld be pleased to order the Clergyman likewise to appear
Personally ?
llis LOILDSIIIP refused to do so at present.
TaEsLove observed that it had been the habit of
• Lord Eldon to do sa in such cases as this, to show under
What authority or circumstances he had solemnized the
Marriage.
,MI LORDSHIP said it might come to that; but that he
'1)0d make no order upon the Divine just now.

VICE-CHANCELLOR'g COURT.
II„ Howoun disposed of several bankrupt petitions this
morning. A few were allowed to stand over in conse-
()timee of the absence of Mr. Horne and Mr. Heald, the
!
torroer gentleman has been for some days very ill, and the
latter has,
we regret to say, suifend a severe domestic ca-
lamity,
The Court rose at twelve o'clock.

eOURT OF KING'S BENCH.
COOMBS v. BROWN.
`I '44 was a trumpery action between two bakers, for
tittnage done to the barrow of the plaintiff, by a horse and
t belonging to the defendant. The whole amount of
damages claimed was but fifty shillings.
'ppeared from the evidence, that the defendant was
"Cvering bread at the house of a customer in the Com-
-luerciat read, Stamford-street, and left his horse and cart
the street, when a mischievous urchin threw a &e—
-l") which blew up near the horsed hoof, who was
"a, Flied at tits explosion, and taking fright ran against du)
IHeiutiff's barrow, which was in the middle of the road.
There were twelve loaves of bread in the barrow which
,\'';ere damaged, and a wheel was knocked off. It appeared
"at tke cost of repairing the barrow was S.
Alr. BuoussorAm, who was for the defendant, rem arked,
t a ease like this ought to have been settled at the Court
Requests.
kr. GURNEY, for the plaintiff, replied, that the Court
"f Requests took no cognisance of any claims but debts.
Ihoucwans said, that at all events, it might have
been
settled in the County Court, at one half the expellee.
Lord TENTHRORN agreed with Mr. 13roughatn, that it
m fight IMO been settled in the County Court, and suggested
that a juror should be withdrawn, and both parties pay their
"'n costs.

The Counsel on both sides having acquiesced in this
4'ggestion,
Lord TENTEIDEN observed that trifling actions, like
the present, were becoming much too frequent. The ex-
Pease to the parties was the least consideration, but the
lees of time, and the growth of which such actions
"ecasioned, was becoming a very serious evil.
The Jury were then discharged from giving any verdict
t)11 the issue.