The Sun.
London, England, 1819-07-08 00:00:00

THURSDAY, JULY 8, 1819.

PARLI A AIE.NT.

HOUSE OF LORDS, JULY 7.

MISCELLANEOUS.

On the Scots Appeal of Winker v. Cunning*
iheir it,i'ignient -went to retrcrsit
that of tee Cure belo.v..

The 11.0v.1 Assent was declared by Commission.
to the Irish Cnsonts Doties, the Parish Vestries,
the Irish Grind Jury Presentments, the PdaStn..
gers ions, and a few other Bills,
The Lor,ts Commissioners were, the Lord
Chancepol, the &art of Ilatrowhy, and the Earl
of Shaftesbury.
Toe Irish Excise Licenses, the Assessed Taxes
Rctier, the Pi :.e Giass. the Irish Permits, the
Irish Bank Cash Paymams, the New South Wales
Customs, time Charitable Funds, •and one or two
return. Bilk, were brought up from the Commons
by• Mr. Brogden and edicts,' and the first wen.
ttuneti Bills were severally read the first time.

INSOLVENT DEBTORS' BILL.
Lard AUCKLAND hAving moved-.:.he rejection of
the insolvent Debtors' Rill, which, lie observed,
under the circumstances. was, in his opinion, the
n,oMt eligible course to pursue;

Lord REDEsnats end - some observations on
the occasion, which seemed to be expressive of
,he opinions- advanced !iv hint on the subject both
or the existing Act' and r measure in questio •
Un torm,r discussions, and in jocification of the
line of e,•nduct pursued by bintsklt in relation to
the subject.
The LORD CHANCELLOR observed, that io the
Act reTectinK insolvent Debtors and the 13,11 in
question were looked at, it would be seen they
xere little more or less than to establish two
systems of Bankrupt Laws. The administeation
of justice should proceed upon clear and distiuct
pliticiples, but let not one half of his Thiji.sty's
subjects be subject to one system of Binkrupt
Laws and the other half to another sysh m.

Lord AUCKLAND spoke shortly in expl,ination,
and disclaimed the slightest intention wh3tever,
in any thing that fell from him, of in-twinging the
oppos►tion made by the Noble and Learned Lord
to the Bill in question. What occurred respect-
ing it, lie thought a serious calamity, as the mea-
sure, in his mind, went to abridge the imprison-
ment of the debtor, and' afforded at the same time
the best means for the security of the creditor.

The question was puG. and the Bill rejected at-
Cordingly.
The LORD CHANCELLOR observed, that being
unable to attend to-morrow torenoon in sufficient
time,
,he should propose that the Order for re-
suming the consider ohm of the Queensberry
causes to-morrow, should be poitooned till Fri-
day, when they should he brou&ht c,n precisely at
ten o'clock..--Oider&d.

Lord AUCKLAND presented a petition from the
Mugistua, s and Town Council of t!tl oval
Burgh ot Llveruess, resperring the Municipal
vernmeni of the Burgh,- which was ordered to lie
upon the table.
On the occasion of the first reading Of Oe Irish .
Bank Cash Payment's Bill, a short conveisation
took place between the Marquess of LANSDOWNR
ind the Earl of LIYEsPoot on the subject, in
which the first mentioned Peer offered no serious
objection to what the 'Bill proposed, but stated
his opinion that certain provisions of the Bill
a ere unnecessary, as, according to his best in-
iolllB,ooll on the subject, the Batik of Ireland
was not placed under the necessity of making: any
purchases of gold whatever against the stated
period.
The Earl of Livetirnot. coincided with the
Noble Marquess in a great degree. He noticed
That en intention had prevailed of puitine the
Bank of Ireland on the looting of the Conctryi

Banks in this part of the United Kingdom, with
respect to Cash eayments, but a prejudice seemed
to prevail against it- at the time.
After a few wortl front the Earl of Ltmencits
the Bill was read the first time.
The Earl of Ltiearoot. moved the second read-
ing of the Itish Still Flues' Bill, and observed,
that a Noble Lord who was desirous of making
some observations ott the subject, authorized hint
(Lord Liverpool) to say, that he had no objec-
tion to the seciind reading of the Bill, as the
discussion may be taken on the next_ stage of the
Bill to-morrow.
The Bill Wis then read the second time.
On the question for the second reading of the
Scots Churches' Bill, some conversation on the
subject took place between the Earl of Lauder-
dale, Viscount Melville, and the Earl of Kosslyn,
in the course of which the Noble Earls made a
variety of objections to the. Bill in its present
shape, and thought it would be preferable to post-
pone the consideration of the measure until the
next Session.
The Bill was read the second time, and coin-
; 'flitted for to. morrow.