The Sun.
London, England, 1821-12-07 00:00:00

iMORNING C.IIROIVICLEI

Although in the present state of Ireland mi-
litary coercion may be necessary to repress
violence, yet we trust that conciliatory mea-
sures will not be neglected to restore confi-
dence ; for in the view that we take of that un-
happy country, its future welfare and tranquillity
depend more on the wisdom and moderation of
our Councils than the force or terror of our
arms. The disturbed state of the sister kingdom
is not now to be solely ascribed to political
views; it is not, as in 1780, struggling for its own
independence, nor, as in 1796, co-operating with
a foreign Power in its hostile designs against Great
Britain. The alleged grievances, though unques-
tionably originating in a mistaken policy, are rather
of a civil than a political nature, and though they
may not immediately allow of complete relief, pre
certainly susceptible of considerable alleviation.

That the uaion of the governed should be the great
object of every system of Government is at least
a moral truth, though there are persons who still •
adhere to that pernicious maxim " divide et
impera," and who hope to supply their own want
of energy by the desolating strife of contending
parties. How fatally this vicious principle has
operated in Ireland we need not describe, while
the Executive Power has been uniformly engaged
in the repression of the crimes of the people,
instead of the redress of their wrongs or the
Irelief of their sufferings. In vain have some
of the most enlightened Statesmen urged
the claims of the majority of the population
to participate with their fellow-subjects in
their civil and political rights—in vain has re-
dress been sought for other grievances.—Among
them great stress is usually laid in Ireland on
absentees. This question, however, involves
considerable difficulty. A number of the ab-
sentees hold large estates in both countries, and
without striking at property, we do not see how
a demand can be made on them to fix their resi-
dence on any other principle than that of incli-
nation. But whether Irish proprietors chuse to
reside in Ireland or England, or elsewhere, there
is no question but that it is their duty as well
as their interest to contribute as much as
they possibly can to the improvement of the
character and condition of the people by
suitable institutions and arrangements. Much
difference of opinion, we know, exists with
regard to the question of absenteeship. It is
maintained by many, that absent proprietors not
merely withdraw their wealth, but also withhold
that protective encouragement which their pre-
sence would afford to the well-disposed, and the
intervention of the local 'authority which might
controul the mischievous and disaffected, it being
impossible to calculate the benefit that a good
man confers by his precepts and example on those
around him, and more particularly where the minds
and habits of a people remain to be formed and
regulated. Others again point to the north of
Ireland, which presents such a contrast to the
south, with a view to shew that too much import-
ance is attached to the residence of landholders
on their properties, and add that in the parts of
this country which, till, lately, bore most resem-
blance to Ireland, the neighbourhoods of land-
holders were seldom the most conspicuous for
improvement.

NAVIGATION ACT,

A BILL

To explain and amend the several Acts for the encouraging and
incrmsing of Shipping and Navigation, and to regulate the
Importation of Goods and Merchandize into Great Britain,
so far as relates to the Countries from whence, and the Ships
in which, such Importation shall be made.

(Continued from our Paper of Wednesday.)
31. And for the establishing by law the several rules and pro-
visions under which the importation of goods and merchandise
into Grew Britain shall be regulated, so far as relates.to the
countries from whence, and the ships in which such importations
shall be made ; be it enacted, that from and after the
goods and merchandize, being of the growth,
production, or manufacture of Asia, Africa, or America, shall
be imported into Great Britain from any part of Asia, Africa,
or America, or from any port or place in Europe, in British-
built ships or vessels only, registered and navigated according
to law, anti not in. any ship or vessel of any other country or
place whatever, under penalty of the forfeiture of all such goods
and merchandize, the growth, production, or manufacture of
Asia, Africa or America, as alien be imported into Great Bri-
tain from any part of Asia, Africa or America, or from any port
or place in Europe, in any ship or vessel not being a British.
built ship or vessel, registered and navigated according to law,
except only in cases hereinafter specially excepted or. pro-
vided for.
32. Provided • always, and be it enacted, that nothing in this
Act contained shall extendor be construed to extend to restrain
or prohibit the -importation of any goods or merchandize, the
growth, production, or manufacture of any part of Asia, Africa
or America, into reat Britain, in such British-built ships as
aforesaid, from any place whatever, either in Asia, Africa or
America,. although such goods or merchandize-may not be of the
growth, production or manufacture of the particular country
from whence such goods or merchandize shall be exported to be
brought into Great Britain.
33. And be it.further enacted, that from and after the
the several sorts of goods and merchandize hereinafter particu- •
larly enumerated mentioned and described being of the growth
or production of any lace in Europe, that is to say, masts, tim-
ber, boards, salt, pitch, tar; tallow, rosin, hemp, flax, currants,
raisins, figs, prunes, olive oil, corn or grain, potashes, wine,
sugars, vinegar, brandy, thrown silk, raw silk or tobacco, shall
into
be imported Great Britain, either in British-built ships or
vessels registered and navigated according to law, or in ships or
vessels of the build of and belonging to the country of which the
said goods are the growth, produce, or manufacture respective-
ly, or in ships or vessels of the build of the country, port, or
place.in Europe, from whence or from any.part whereof such
goods and merchandize shall be exported or shipped for the
purpose of being exported to Great Britain, and wholly owned
by the people of such country, port, or place, and navigated by •
a master and of use mariners thereof, at least of •
such country, port, or place, and not in any other ship or vessel
whatsoever, under penalty of the forfeiture of all such goods or
merchandise as shall be imported into Great Britain, prom any
place in Europe; in any ship or vessel not being such British-
built ship or vessel as aforesaid, or not being a ship or vessel of
such country, port, or place in Europe as•aforesaid, and navel'
gated as aforesitl, except only in cases hereinafter specially ex-
cepted or provided fur. •
34. Provided always, and be it enacted, that nothing in this
Act contained shall extend or be construed to extend to prohibit
the importation, into Great Britain, of any goods or merchan-
dizes, the growth, production or manufacture of any part of
Europe, and not hereinbefore expressly specified, enumerated
or described in any ship or vessel whatsoever, and from any
place whatsoever, as -such goods or merchandize might have
been imported into. Great Britain at any time before the
35. And be 'elle:dared and enacted, that the island of. Malta
and its dependencies shall for all purposes whatever be deemed.
and taken to be in Europe.
36.-pro,ided abeieferther enacted, that from and.
after the said .shall and may be lawful for any person
or persons to import into Great Britain, from any place in Eu-
rope, any quantity of -guilt Senegid of the growth or produce of
any place whatsoever, either in a British-built ship or vessel; re-
gistered and navigated according to law, or in a ship or vessel of
the build of the country pert or place in Europe from whence or
from any part whe:eoi such gam Senegal shall be exported or
shipped for the purpose of being exported to Great Britain, such
ship or vessel of such cowl-try port or place being wholly eseseee
by the people of suet country port oreblace, and being navigat-
ed by a master and a the mariners at least of
such country port or place, and not in any other ship or vessel
whatsoever, under penalty of the forfeiture of all such gum Se-
negal as shall be imported into Great Britain in any ship or
vessel not being such British-built ship cr vessel, or not being
a ship or vessel of such country, port or place as aforesaid,
owned and navigated as. aforesaid.
37. And be it further enacted, that from and after thee.
it shall and may be lawful for the Com-
missioners of his Majesty's Treasury of the United. Kingdom of
Great Britain and Ireland, or any three or more of them, and
they are hereby authorized and empowered, by warrant under
their hands, or the hands of any thhae or more of them, to or-
der and direct that any British piny or vessel, which at any
time before the first day of May, one thousand seven hundred
and eighty-six, was duly registered as a British ship, • shall
have and be entitled to all the privileges and advantages belong_
in to 10-3ritisli built-ship, and shall and may be registered as
aßritish built-ship ; provided it shall in, all
all cases be thadeap.
pear to the satisfaction of the kaki Commissioners of the Trea-
sury, or any three or more of them, that ever such ship ear vessel,
for which
ch
rseugcilsitperrievd as n
Britishilegeshallbeshclipaimbeefdor,eathae said first day
s actually and
identicallyof May, one thousand seven 'marked and eignty-six, and that
no foreigner has, since the time of such registry, had any share,
property, or concern, in such ship or vessel, and that such ship
or vessel
beelyhoansdnowthbaetenisrealplaoiwreedd in say
law, and that such ship on
any foreign port, at any ex-
vessel is in every other respect entitled to the privilege 6f a

Mit" ship and in such case every mlOl strip or vessel from
and after the date of the registryinade of such ship or vessel as a
British-built ship, by virtue of such warrant, shall be deemed
and taken to be a British built ship, and shall be entitled to all
the privileges and a.dvairtages to which a British built ship is
by law entitled, and as if such ship or vessel had been originally
British built, to all intents and purposes whatsoever.
33. And be it further enacted, that from and after the
any British-built ship or vessel which shall
have been or shall be registered as such, and which after being
so registered shall have been or shall be sold to or' become
wholly the property of some person or persons not being a sub-
ject or subjects of his Majesty, his heirs or successors, shall to
all intents and purposes be deemed and taken to be a ship or
vessel of the built of the Foreign country, port or place (if in
Europe) of which the person or persons, to whom such ship or
vessel shall be sold, shall be a subject -or subjects, er;-: to which
such person or persons shall belong ; and it shall and may be
' lawful to import in any such ship or vessel any goods or mer-
chandize from any such Foreign country port or place in Eu-
rope into Great Britain, in like manner as if such ship or vessel
were of the built of such Foreign country port or place in Eu-
rope ; any law usage or custom to the contrary notwithstanding:
Provided always, that in case any such British-built ship or
vessel having once become the property of any person or persons
not being a British subject or subjects, shall again become the
property of any British subject or subjects, (otherwise than by
capture and, legal condemnation) such ship or vessel shall not,
on any pretence whatsoever, be again deemed taken or consider-
ed to be a British- built ship or vessel, not entitled to be regis-
tered as such, nor to any other privileges ur advantages as a
British-built ship or vessel.
39. Provided always, and he it 'enacted, that nothing in this
Act contained shall extend or be construed to extend to repeal
each part of the hereinbefore recited Act.; passed in tire twelfth
year of the reign of King Charles the Second, for the increasing
of Shipping riiid Navigation, as relates to bullion, or to goods
taken by way of reprisal.
40. Provided also, and be it declared and enacted, that no-
thing in this Act contained shall extend or be construed to
extend to repeal or alter, or in way to' affect or infringe any of,
the provisions contained in two Acts for the Union of Great
Britain and Ireland, the one made in the Parliament of Great
Britain, in the thirty-ninth and fortieth years of the reign of his -
said late Majesty Xing George the Third, and the other made
in the Parliament of Ireland, in the fortieth year of the reign of
his said late Majesty, or in any other Act or Acts in force im--
mediately before the by which the importa-
tion of goods or merehandize into Great Britain from Ireland
or into Ireland from Great Britain, or from foreign parts, is in
any way permitted, allowed, restrained, prohibited or regulated
in any manner whatever ; but that all goods and merchandize
shall and may be imported into Great Britain from Ireland,
and into Ireland from Great Britain, or. from foreign parts,
,!torn and after the said in such manner,

and under and subject to such regulations in all respects, as are
contained in the said Ads for the Union of Great Britain and
Ireland, or in any other Act or Acts in force immediately be-
fore the said until provision shall be otherwise
made by Parliament, with respect to the same ; any thin; in
this Act contained to the contrary in anywise notwithstanding.
41. Provided also, and be it enacted, that nothing in this Act
contained shall extend, or be construed to extend, to alter or re-
peal, or in any way to affect or infringe any Act or Acts, or any
provisions contained in any Act or Acts, in force immediately
before the relating to thie importation into

Great Britain of any goods and inerchrindize. whatsoever front
any British colony, plantation, territory or dominion in Asia;
Africa, or America ; and that all goods and merchandize the
growth, produce or manufacture of any British colony, planta-
tion, territory or. dominion, and all goods and merchandize
whatsoever which may by law be imported into Great Britain
from any such British colony, plantation, territory or dominion,
shall and may be imported, and shall continue to be imported
into Great Britain, in such manner and under all such rules
and regulations, restrictions, penalties, and forfeitures in all re-
spects as are contained in any Act or Acts in-ifrree, in relation
to such goods and merchandize, immediately before the said
any thing in this Act
contained to the contrary in anywise notwithstanding.
42. Provided also, and be it enacted, that nothing in this
Act contained shall extend or be construed to extend to alter or
repeal any Act or Acts, or any provisions contained in any Act
or Acts, in force immediately before the
which in any way relate
to the trade or commerce of the islands of Guernsey, Jersey,
Sark, Alderney or Man, or to the trade between Great Britain
and those Islands respectively ; but that the trade and com-
merce of the said Islands respectively shall continue to be car-
ried on and regulated'in all respects as if this Act had not
been made.
[To be Continued.]

LAW INTELLIGENCE.

COURT OF CHANCERY, DEC. 6.
BOLD P. STEWART.

Mr. HART proceeded with his argument in this cause
which was before the Court yesterday. - He contended that the
three bills upon which the action was brought, formed part of
those bills which Mr. Greg,son had accepted on ins own account
in relation to the Para transaction. Ile therefore only asked
that the plaintiff might, by the injunction,.. be protected from
the liability to ansWer'what ought to be considered the separate.
debt of Gregson.
Mr. SPE xcE followed on the same side.
•
Mr. INALD, for' the defendant, maintained:that the bills
drawn on'account of the Para transaction could not be viewed
as a separate,debt of Gregson, because it apvired that the
money raised on those bills was lodged hi the hands of Messrs.
Barton and Co: the brokers' employed by Bold and Co., for
the benefit of that firm. Conceding, however, • that the bills
given by Gregson for the purpose of furnishing the outfit to'
Para were given without the privity of the plaintiff and his
other partner, the defendant affirmed that these bills were in
no way connected with the bills upon which the action at law
was founded. It was distinctly sworn in the. answer, that the
three bills which formed the subject of the proceeding at law
against Mr.. Bold were not given by Gregsoni on account of the
Para transaction. That denial, he con:ended, Overthrew the
equity which the plaintiff had advanced in his bill.
The Court rose at two o'clock.

:_ .~

VICE-CHANCELLOR'S. COURT, DEC. G.
IN RE HOWARD AND GIBES..
This subject was mentioned this morning, for the purpose of
fixing a time for hearing the supplemental petition for suve.ntl-
ing. the •order to choose new assignees till Messrs. Grimstead
and Carroll should prove their debts. To-morrow, at three
o'clock,
,we s. fixed for the purpose. There was no otha. cuuse
of general importance.

COURT OF KING'S BENCH, DEC. 6.
At Nisi Prins.--.Before the LORD CHIEF .lI:9TICE.
WOOLLEY, EXECUTRIX OF WOOLLEY, Y. CLARK, KELLY,

AND ANOTiipt.
. This was an action of trover. The claim was stated at 40t11.
Mr. BROUctitaNt introduced the plaintiff, N; rs. Woolley, as
toe relict and executor of Walter Woolley, of Clerkenwell.
Walter 'Woolley was by trade a brazier. Clark, the first de-
fendant, plied the calling of a hairdresser ; the second and third
defendants in the record were an auctioneer and his clerk ; and
the tort corpplained•of arose out of ch•curnstances something
extraordinary. Waiter Woolley (in his lifetime) loved and
employed the tfefendant Clark : he made a will, and named the
bather hii tfriteciittne • thrrs ars tbition •iiittnittelcentelifdt,e'
by anticipation,. all the charms of office ; and went so far (in
the fervour of his fancy) as to take u: sin him, presently, state
anti dignity, and to meddle (even in Woolity's 'lifetime) with
the conduct of his-affilirs. But Woolley did uot.like to be thus
Morally buried alive. That the friseut'should "so hunger for
his empty chair" displeased ham. Consulting his friends, he
found that a brazier (even after making.a was • not irre-
coverably dead in law ; and he resolved to take steps for assert-
ing his own existence. Now Clark had 'Woolley's will in his
keeping. Woolley sent word • that'he wished to have the will
back. - Clark told Woolley that he owed -hint ..411. and deter-
mined to keep the will as security for his debt. Woolley de-
dared that he revoked the will. ('_ark did not value the revo-
cation a hair. Woolley dismissed the barber from his executor-
ship. The barber defied, him, and -refused to be cashiered.
The will was a will, and he (the barber) had it : he (the bar-
ber).was executor, and executor he would remain. Placed in
this very singular situation—a living testator haying his will
disputed by an executor—the plaintiff took the obvious rcutedy:
as he could not get back the drat will,tile made a second. .Of
toe second will so made, Mrs. Woolley was executrix ; notice of
its execution was given to Mr. Clark; and the testator (having
now nothing further to arrange) in due course died. Upon that
event the firTtdefendant spake. In vain were Mr. Woolley 's dispo-
, sitions promulgated, in vain was his last will read over to Mr.
Clark. The contumacious barber, true as steel to his original de-
claration, treated the second will as mere waste paper, and pro-
ceeded to act as executor upon the first. Praha was applied for ;
and Mr. Clark succeeded in obtaining it. The property of the
• deceased was seized, and Mr. Clark put it into-the hands of the
second defendant, Kelly. Mrs. Woolley gave notice to stay
operations ; but no attention was paid to tier remonstrance. She
• requested at least that the go.ods might not be. sold ; but the
flexible barber sold them, even at a loss. At length, by the
vigour of Clark's proceedings, Mrs. Woolley (Mr.-Brougham
said) was driven to proceed in her turn. She caused the
gotten probat to be revoked; she obtained another to be ttrant-
, ed to herself; under that second and rightful authority she pow

brought her action ;- and sought reparat:,:,n for h;:r wrongs from.
a jury of her country: •
Mr. NOLAN appeared on the part o: the defrr. dar.ts. Kelly 4
he said, was an auctioneer; the third defendant- was. Kelly's
agent merely ; and both, having acted under a regular probaa
in .the hands of Clark, were (as he submitted) justific'd in what
they had done. With respect to Clark himself (i%lr. Noma
said), he should at once prove hew. administravit ; and, having
applied all proceeds to.the payment of just and regular- debts;
that defendant could not stand in a worse situation than execu-
tor de son tort. _ _

The LORD CHIEF JusTicE differed from Mr. Nolan as to
the law of the case. _ _ _

Mr. NOLAN then addressed the jury, aid gave evidence
that the third defendant (Kelly, sen.) had taken no part in the
transaction.

The Jury eventually found against Clark and Kelly, junior,
with 4001. damages ; subject to the opinion of the Court upon
the law,' and to reference out of Court as to the real amount
of damages.
THE KING V. CATTIAItINT: SOLOMON 3.
This was an indictment for assault : the parties are both in
the olillclothes line.
Hannah Benjamin (the prosecutrix) detailed the circum-
stances of the assault. There was a quarrel between witness and
Mrs. Solomons. Mrs. Solomons canic to the shop of witness,
and said that she was come "to give 'it her well." Mis. Solo-
mons gave a beating to witness ; and, witness gave Ni rs. Solo-
mons to the watchman.

Cross-examined—Miss Benjamin admitted that she bad done
penance at Marylebone Church fin- reflections upon Mrs. So.
lomons' p,-rsonal chastity. She did penance, but not in a white
sheet ; and she submitted to the penanc, (though unmerited);
because a suit in the Ecclesiastical Court was too expensive.
Witnesses were celled on Loth sides ; bat the assault did,
not appear to have been of a very naittra.
The jury found the defendant Guilty..

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, DEC. 6.
Sittings zt Nisi Prins before the Curt: v Jt: sT ICE.
Etta: and OTHERS WARD: • •

The SOLICITOR-OE:4MA', on the iota of the plaintiffs,
stated that this was an issue otit of the High (:Dirt of ChaneerVi
to try the legitimicy.of the late William Cotten, a lunatic, anti
whither he was the lawful son and heir of Wm. Cotton, of the
county of Stafford, and of Rebecca Webster, his wife. Oa
question was of great importance, as it regarded the purity of
Wood of one of the most ancient families or England— the Cot-
tons, of Shropshire ; and also as it regarded the very large.pro.
petty which the decision involved, amounting to not less-than
200,0001. The Jury would perceive at once the length to which the
trial must proceed, and the character of the evidence to be ad-
duced, when he stated to them that the lunatic himself, whose
legitimacy they were now to try, was born soon after the begin-
nine' of the last century, was dead acme years, and had lived
to die . advanced age of eighty. He should now call the at-
tention of the Jury to the family from whom the lunatic was
immediately descended., Rowland Cotton,a grandfather of the
lunatic, was married about the year 1701, and shortly after
William Cotton, the father of the lunatic, was born. - In the
year 1726, Rowland Cotton made a family settlement with his
son William, by which he stipulated that the large estate of the
family was to go by entail to his eldest son—namely, the sail
William Cotton, and the father of the lunatic, but with the cx-
press condition that he should never marry without the consent
of his father--namely, of the said Rowland Cotton. Immedi-
ately after this Wm. Cotton went • abroad and visited several
Courts of Europe, with the Duke of Kingston, and did not re-
turn till the year 173-6 or •1737. Soon after his retain he married.
Rebecca Webster, but in consequence of the proviso in the
family settlement, he kept his marriage concealed from his fa-
ther. Upon the event taking place,. he went to live at Owl:-
, my, near There-by, in Nottinghamshire, the seat of the Duke
of Kingston, and represented to- his father that he was residing
there on a visit with the Duke—a circumstance possible enough,
from the intimacy that subsisted between the parties. • There
he remained till the year 1744, when his father, by so:ne cas-
ualty, became acquainted with his marriage. In consequence
of this a new family setdemeat vas made, from which it would
appear that Rowland Cotton became reconciled 'to his son's
marriage ; for it was recited in the deed of settlement as hav-
ing taken place some years past, and various pro Visions were
made for the children of that marriage, which recited the order
of 'their birth : and the eldest son was William, who had the
misfortune to become a lunatic when he was about 34 years of
age, and had always been recognised by di ! whole family as
the lineal heir of Rowland Cotton, had exei ei led rights of pro-
perty as such, and was so named in Valbits deeds. When the
Jury considered the remote period at which the marriage of
William Cotton with Rebecca 'Webster took place, they would
find it to be long antecedent to the period of the :Marriage Act
which rendered' particular forms and observances necessary.
That Act was passed in 1754, and before that time it was sulli-
dent todegalize a marriage that a priest was in the room when
it was solemnized. He (the' Solicitor-fl-eneral) would alley/
, that ,thee
.Reverend .Ir, Richardson had eliristened the . seae-
ral children, the issue- of the marriage in question, and in
the register, where a distinction •was made between legiti-
mate, baseborn, sad bastard, no degrading distinction could
be found •as applicable to the - present case. He would i.lio
chew, that upon one occasion, when the father invited Mr.
Richardson to dine with him, 'after having christened one of his
-children, he made use of these remarkaide words, that "he
hoped. he would soon have the tile:Asia-re of:laving Mrs. Riehaid-
son as a viaiter at his house, which could not be the case at that,
time." Was it likely that he should have expressed hims-211
-thus it' it were not a matter of notof9tv that he was not mar-
ried ? He would ahoy that, for a series of years, no que;tion
had been raised about the legitimuy of lilliam Cotton. nor
would one have slew been raised, had not the defandant,'Ma.
' Ward; set up a claim as heir to Evelynathe second brother of
the lunatic... He should, however, shew that Evelyn, tinder,
whoni the defendant claimed; so far from disputing the titre 01
his eldest brother,. had acted on the death of his father as Com-
mittee for the lunatic before the Chancellor. Now, with thi4
acknowledgment from Evelyn.- himself, how could any other
person claim from bins as his next heir ? He knew not v4lO
• sort of de.fehee would be made on the other side, but the Jul
• would form an estimate of it when it came before them.
' A great mass of evidence, both docunientary and viva voce.
! was then offered fOr the plaintiff's, which actupied the Courts:l,
whole day. It all went to shew that the father and mother 0'
the lunatic bore the reputation of having been married at t-14
time of his birth, and that in his life-time no question had hea'
raised about his legitimacy. '
The ,case for the plaintiff closed at six a'clock,when the Co'-'.4.
adjourned the further consideration till to-morrow (this day.)
-On 'Tuesday Tuesday night last',. 'during Om het: vi

storm, the house of Mr. PEt.r.Ew,in Kenningtoty
green, was broken into, and robbed of propertl
to a corsiderable amount. ft appeared that thee
robbers had entered by a window at the back 0-
the house into the kitch.n, from whence the,'
went to the parlour, which. they cleared of
sideboard of plate. They also broke open v,
BecrOtaire, and took out of ita.quantity of sove"
reigns and silver, leaving in it every thing; how'
ever, which could be of no service to them. Thef
afterwards with a key, which had been kept i 0
the secretaire, opened an iron chest which hlf
below stairs; anti contained old papers aul
parchments,. which they turned out in search 0
things of more viklut._to„thein, They must hit,rA
been much at theireaie—twliile in the house, si
they also broke open the wine-cellar, and drani‘
very freely.

IS 1 RT •
On Tuesday, the 4th instant,,Mvki Skynner, of Great Part'
land-street, of a son.
Yesterday, the 6th-instant, at Keii Ireton,, the Lady of
Wilberforce, Egl. jun., of a six heir.

111Aii RIE 1).
tue 6th instant :Mr. John Lace.

Weller',"

Yesterday

Silver-streei;son of Win. Wdlzr. Esq., cf Anttrsliam, klu-/.(sl
to Maria, youngest daughter of M. Fcott, Esq., of Clapb-"
Surrey.
Yesterday; the 6th instant, at St. John's, Nackm y, Mr. lif;
'
ratio C. A. Hardy of Buxton, to Sart.:ll . eldest daughter of t'
late Charts R os4. Esq., shipbuilder.. itriebent

-
DI .t.;!;. ' 1
Yesterday. the Ctli instant, at Canonbury, aged 7 S
8, arjll
widow of the late Rev. John Ilen,'lntatc of Daldington. , A:
On the 17th July, at Valencia, in South America, P-',.'or
wounds. received on the Nth of June, in the decisive batV:_ta
Carabobo, Thomas Merton Ferriar, Esq. eldest :son of the I..c"e,
Dr. Ferriar, of Manchester. Colonel in the Columbian s'-'l-r,Ol
and Adjutant-General of the =my of the Apure :—a fegr',;,e
soldier, and an amiable and high-Minded gentleman. T.°_,...0.
gallantry with which he led into- action, against vastly dic;
portioned numbers, the small corps of British.engagesL"' f.,:,
rabobo, the victory of that day is chiefly attributed. il.' a 4
mains were attended to the grave by the Piesident Builv ti
Chief Mourner : and a public monument has been de„ gee
tt
his memory by the Supreme Congress of Colombia.- ears
On Saturday last, at Brompton, of 'r. decline, in his 2' ,(''''
Mr. George Tkridurnan, late of St. .T ' 0........ loe'
o.in' Col;, . •
.......,—. . ---
_,„
Printed and Published, for the Pkioriir—r .:us. oz r4l'"
Orixea,.ll2, Strand, by J. B. CAIL;I'A:HS•