The Sun.
London, England, 1845-03-04 00:00:00

wars t o a distance of 2,000 yards. He thought it oug°'to
be limited to the distance in the deviation clause. serf
Mr. DARBY compluined of the power given to engi!
to go in upon land, and the consequence was, that the 0,7,,
neer invariably complained that he had "too little Janke
(Laughter.) He (Mr. Darby) contended that the eng%to
ought to know how much land he would require to decio„,)
upon, and, if he could not tell that, then he (Mr. Dar '
contended that he did not know his business. 41
Sir G. STRICKLAND agreed that there was Inusol
be complained of on this point, but there wasre
, 'it
difficulty to be met with in trying to remedythe
He thought it would be well to have all reinediek,
such greivances put into one consolidated Bill, in order t°,7i
when they did occur, parties might not be put to the trt,,,
of trying to find out in what particular Bill the rented L.,0
He had heard of an instance where an excavation ha ° std
made by a railway company, and they left a pond of 11
that they never filled up, so that the owners, instesee
having the vacancy filled up, got a swamp in lieu of hull
(Laughter.) in However, he feared that temporary oecuPa
of the land this way would always be necessary et;
Sir W. JOL LUTE said that railway companies had g°°;el
such a length in making those deposits on land as t° 0.'0(4
often sink a house in a hole that before that had a veil 5010
site. He had got compensation certainly for the lniutl.q tir
to his land, but not as much as he conceived he lc etree
titled t•t, and he believed that he would not have
got
that had he not procured an injunction from the tiv
Chancery. oeJ
Mr. HAWES could not see how the Bill could be Pettier
without such a clause, for if it were struck out alt°g"thall
the landowner would be in a much worse positioll
before.
Mr. FORBES opposed the clause. Under the present , the
of estimating the value of land by the injury done to 'lto
proprietor very often only got sixpence where he Ong
have a shilling. stri'elc
Mr. 'l'. EGERTON thought the douse ought to be . denef
out altogether, and leave to the Committee to take ey!, the:
as to the quantity of land which might be required,
to introduce a clause into the private Bill confirrtn°:the
powers of the (maven.), to the land mentioned thel
evidence.—(Hear, hear.) As the clause stood' odor
;,ave a company a sort of roving commission, of
discriminate and almost unlimited powers to encroach ripll e
land their engineer thought proper to name. At orr
if they did not strike out the clause, it ought in 7
spects, to be materially modified. had er
Mr. DARBY said the Hon. Member for Lambeth. toa
tirely avoided the point he had raised. What lie obie‘gineth
was this, they gave indiscriminate powers to the 10111
who invariably omitted to mention the quantity of too
roundrequire, and after the Bill was passed, ° el
and said he wanted this and that land, littel
had never been thought of before, either by the 6°l'llol
or the owner. Now, what he wanted them to do f
the Engineer decide in the Committee the quantitsse
th
he would require,, and afterwards confine him to it 7, 0°
tits, without giving the unlimited powers containeu,
• 10
clause they were then discussing. gl dilagad
Aft3r a few words from Mr. CAVENDISH in 00.
the railway to Lincoln, and the opposition of the ',„ steli
Gallant Member for that city (Colonel SibthorP)
• • ts°
Railway Bill, be fu•
Colonel SIBTHORP said he heartily desired op°
welfare of that city ; but with respect to railroad Vs brj
he should still pursue the course he had done-
lieved that the first step towards the ruin of that 1' ',,re562:6
be the making of a railroad ; it was with that' %rieP
—he might say conviction—that he had taken the ore
110'
had done. They were told of compensation, anda°'
Member had stated a case of great pere°,7oaotbot
which he said he had overlooked on °--diti
the public good. This did him great ere )3010
he understood that, in one place, three,
persons bad been attacked by a formidable duceiej
tile small pox, in consequence of the bad air 141 tss^
throwing up the embankments of the railroad- hadnr
of compensation, but could they restore any lives th° sisd
lost? The railroad would injure the tradesmen ports,
keepers of the City, and lie gloried in having an 'Pod die/
of pursuing the same course now that he colool
on former occasions. He had seen so much a
of that House, and so much of the "humd to .00
manoeuvres of engineers, that he was almost atili„se of
d
his real opinion of them. He should take the trtbis
House on the subject, and he therefore moved all" 1,6
be expunged. Galls Aye,
Mr. GLADSTONE hoped the Hon. and Gauals&
would not persist in moving the expulsion of the c
Colonel SIBTHORP—I will.---(Laughter.) OAI to'
Mr. GLADSTONE—What would be the res-il)ry Lit
punging it ? In his opinion it would be prscticare sire,so,
ing every word in it, fur all the powers it gave
obtained by all the private Acts, and the priva'7„..-C 'Or
mittee would give companies those powers ag°`•ies)" ttO
shame for them," from Colonel Sibthorpe--lat,.piejol*,
ther it would be more shame for them or nor,
this would be the infallible result. He 113°‘"-'010,0),
support every amendment and restriction of the_rdepook
much gained. He was for making the best:Z.looA'
possible, and he thought there was some reason P';„ the,
ment of the Honourable Member for Sussex, `"'to dob
that these powers should only to giverte
s of tad'
where they might be necessary to nake,,„efor
In the case of brick-work also ; it was imp s osslu 0140'
gineer to foresee bow many bricks would dfal
and therefore, in his opinion, the power ° wer'riete!,
ought to be given. If this clatis°A proPi,
be expunged the effect would be that the sand 000
would be disregarded, and the wealthy classes
9
be cared for. icier oso
Lord G. SOMERSET said that he would cored be 01'
position of the Hon. Member for Sussex,
.kissve„,,
move that the Chairman report progress, and 35 7 talcs
again on Thursday. In the meantime, he wool,' okil eto
portunity of communicating with his 'Hen. Frlec,booloo'
if they could not frame a clause which shoula,tosto
difficulty which was felt on all sides of the ,
clause as it now stood. 1;ail
The amendment was then withdrawn. /soble ,
Mr. AGLIONBY said that he hoped if the. be 'of,
would not commit himself by a pledge, thaion 0 oat
at least resolve to avoid the vagueness of deviat tore
he now so strongly ohjected,for he thought thanolf
to be some restriction on the laxity of practice w to
gineers.
Lord G. SOMERSET said he was quite •rtes
sy
the wishes of the House, and consider the ficcyetil- ,p)
way companies, as well as to endeavour to pre's- 0'
of landed proprietors. I SOOTII,
RAILWAY CLAUSES CONSOLIDATIONv •
BILL. "
Mr. FOX MAIJLE asked the Noble Lord 1461 lloHfls;
bring on the Scotch Railway Bill? t be i
Lord GRANVILLE SOMERSET said Or 0-Pcs°"
petted his Hon. and Learned Friend the land
would have been in the House this mornicg,
not take up the amendments without him. Clats▪ eb• aa
It was ultimately agreed that the RailwaY, „
land) Bill, and the Land Clauses Consolidati°'
be considered on Thursday.
and obtj?-
The CHAIRMAN then reported progress,
to sit again on Thursday at Twelve o'clock-
The House then adjourned till Five o'clock-

,tili
that
a gedh eirnAtlhaej Majesty
------______--
wrealls:ollOitk,eaßlnydTton.UocwarGrinvAien:tioi:egi.necstphsevreirot efjolol,o;
By our Lisbon correspondence of the 26th ult,
1,0%;0
err
desired purpose of granting an amnesty to tbe la bP
where. be
tvuel olt•
The accounts of her Majesty's health contillil si e 0,011 IP
The baptism of the young Infanta took place 0° 11C,ollal• 10'
The Bill for the Abolition of the ConservatorillbodYgto
Portuguese possessions,
its definitive form, had been laid before the Ch,anierf ilifts'fll
ties. A project of law for the abolition of 51°- IPr rte"
date of the promulgation of the proposed law, '`,,' ,eciol
of Slavery
inordinate
e rity
to the Chamber of Peers, and transferred to the '''' AO
in the case of children heorsi prissp,i,
o'• i
111/ Pet lii
in cases of smuggling s'i. 0 ,c h-'
Another project of a very different kihd ;MP° ie-° fo'
, .41 ,0
1.,(7. C°l.- I, 0
country, was introduced by Ministers. teet;v•,,,cri
house receipts of Lisbon, Oporto, end ,SeTbel)llo^44.
the month of January, had greatly fallen On.. co'e 01
tions for libels on the Government had ago editor
The first of six state prosecutions against mitilaitteh r illt
tcuadpeit,al
heard on the 17th ult., and terminated in an 2"..iect °-011
foris t
tRh
A new financial statement, and a 13,i'''' of hlt:
oemac,enovnersiaenn e2ett!raZinGaionrYrteerreoes":o,oeiotflitstoi-t::
reign debt, and habilitating the
that object and meet outstanding engegeni,eabisl, en beiLl
submitted, it was reported to the Minister I, he isia
been sanctioned by him. It was likely to ' cotto
.#.O
the Cortes, notwithstanding the ministerebe otteltcy
Tojal were said to be unfavourable to it. leo Selitloi°
supposed to be the subject of differences botrre eel the
bral and his colleagues, and of altercations ben'
eit •
Tojal and Senhor Roma. forlegi• ill
..,.A in ~,,010 t.,,‘
At the bottom of every financial Ineas".„-nollt ',,,'' era
small incidental proposal for a large loan le 7,,- not 0„,
the present case, no doubt, Senhor Roma wl" ogle PI".
his patrons, or forego the opportunity of doing ll
i?,
with them.— Chronicle.
140'
re,
BIRTH d. 0 Oar 0(11.1s di
10'
On the 2d inst., at George-street, mull 0
frit tb
Louie Murray, oadaugllter. .ori.- ' - 4
ifyde r pci
On the 25th ult., in Sussex-gardens, .t.leal,
of William Batty, Esq of a son. ,Av of Vir ' ' Ai'
On the 25th ult., in Parksquare, the Jaw clf "
of a son. • the le ,
shill.' 0
On the 20th ult , at Leighton, Bedford PP"
Woodman, Esq., of a daughter. Wife of ~,ifi
On the 24th inst., in Golden-square, thetb,)
pleson, Esq., of a daughter. 130°4 'tll
On the 24th ult., at St. Mary's Rector'', _ ~1010
of the Rev. E. E Lockwood, of a daughter. John PP' I*
On the 25th ult., in Norfolk street, We' ifill
OP
Isaacson, of a son. r il°Pl le
On the 25th ult., at Shirfield Rectory, n"..ss„, i. %,
the lady of the Rev. W. R. Tomlinson, 0, Siii.ay Of d i 4
On the 25th ult., at Coley park, the Pr
Monck, Esq., of a son. d TairerPer' ri
tlf
On the 26th ult., the lady of Edniun la 'l4
.., the
Stoke Newington. of a son. C.1.1.4e...t of
On the 26th ult., at Wadhurst Castle, P..- 0
B. H:lrding, Esq., of a daughter. _,,,,,.p1ae 0 /
On the 26th ult., Mrs. John Sim, of till."'
t
park, of a son. 0 1
.11A Biagi). , ..aoritiolciont
On the 22d of October, at Port Lorn, 'brace,
_", Jo
Gallwey, Esq , Royal Artillery,. to Co
.n.? kigL hiatidliii,o9
the late Archibald H. Monro, 1..5(1., 92'1 Mr. i• 'of
On the 25th ult., at St. Clement iDaneosAlevt fsq.,
to Mariann. ,daughter of the late IV. li , i
0
the
Queen-street, Lincoln's Inn-fields.
DIED. 'n ICent'Lota
On the 3d inst ,at Lessons, his seat, ,I„.racey .4,
Hon. William Draper,
Lord Wvnforn, ''''
bp Gor,ivec,,
Justice of the Court oComnion fleas• c; j
ld , Sir ° chetl-19
On the Ist inst., in Lincoln's Inn-fi'e Cgoort °Dr f'sil''' IV
late one of the Barons of her Majesty
sa hired A rso. 0,, ,4
Barbarously mur.lered, by a ban ~,b, of thetorroNe,
Decembersaa Juanpore, on theno'sioter, 'pop?
Mr. James Barwise,
indigroident °.„f aturetaloill
Margate, but for the last 18 years as
with the Teft wl
They seem to hake gone to the bonen
1 bods,th°Y 06
r,i lillic
sign of murder. After cutting up t i • .
'llg- •
antlewortb
touching a single article. Mr. 1‘ ' Doi
On the 11th ult., at W , ~ c 9. 1.,_,„
• road, ago. a,.si i 11;.--
late of Christchurch, Blackfrtars- vidow 01 .0),
Qn the 22d ult., at Bath, Mary, i ilizahe
Wyche, Esq., of Lutwyche, Salop. Th.„,,pton, ' ,
On the 22d ult , at Montpelierquare, P ' '
ICIS• •'. '°l
relict of the late Lieutenant-Colonel Iteyuo
______<-40v,
--- 0 Ijile• i
----------------„foo ti°
',mem: Fruited and Published by i.,.
..1 OOP 0.00
No. 112, Strand, Printer. at The ow , she,--
Straid, in the Preleiun, of the Savoy, "
Bliddlesea, Tuesday, Biarch 4)184