The Sun.
London, England, 1828-06-27 00:00:00

were not more than► half stoaked.

If the

could not receive his money, the produce ,t
country must necessarily greatly diminish, pi
length the whole country would have to be
plied by foreign corn. He had heard a re°,
about the increase of tents, but-ha could tie
that any such increase taketitplate;•:•:,llllos
that lands now were 'cultiyated 'which befall
left waste, and that in spaiticular spats the
land had increased in large tO7ps, such d
ininghani and Man Chester springing up
00l
therii.; but if Lordships wouldl
old estates,. where no incidental altereitioo,
taken place, they would find that the rents
increased. There was one estate of which be
. _AO
the history,' the rent of which, in 1620, nnf
531. a-year, and it was -now no :trnega;.tharld,
a-year, from which there was to be deducted 8010
for land tax. In fact, almost all the grass, Joao
at the same rent that it did 100,yeareago, jle.g
eluded by stating that he was decidedly eppo
the Bill.—The Bill was then read a third -tint

Lord STANHOP.E, proposed an Juno'
the effect of WhiCh was to prevent importation
this country- at too lOw. a rate of duty, such I°o
corn as had been previously imported iup the
•
'Guernsey; 46.1 Hersey, '
4rd ELLENBOROUGH said, that the
Man 'would soon be placed on the same footint
the rest. of 'the erepire; and as to the,-other
their privileges ought to be preserved to them,
inconvenience to this country wOuldnot.bonlo
Lord. REDESDALE suggested, that the 0
mode would be not to allow -the people of tbe)o
of Man to. export into this country any CO)
their own, and then there would be, no dorif
their expornag corn-at Into, This eotintrY,
did not grOw enough for their own COniumptioo
The 'Amendment tees negatived.. .
The Earl of ROSSLYNpraPosed
for the purpose of altering the Nirsireiaiiisint SYj
- Lord ELLENBOROUGH. said, that the it
Proposed by the Bill was the. -hest 04.. cork
adopted, as by thiS 'system. 0.!-e'eprn: waiteborl,
this' country would. be always under Ore:contra.
the' Government.
'The amendment was negatived.
Earl STANHOPE :then proposed, that tre',
additional towns ix Scotland and Ireland ahoy
added to those from which the averages were
taken. •

• 'The Duke of WELLINGTON objected to
•,
Amendment, riot on the ground of any., abstract
ciPle; but because' it would alter'ibe.basia on
the averages had been formerly taken. The P'
at these places varied so much, that,the
of the Amendment would make a difference oft'
per cent. in the State of the averages; aid it vi
be better to increase the scale of the .duties. _ _

sceo: hain
sidereydi
pelf in dite
tits - antis,
Mainler
.4peatnana
with what
.Vith,reap
'Th•Portupl,
—Mr- Se
• ,erplapittio
dully` jtisti
thit the n
'•
pliorto
CIPICS wl
• Great
'akd the oil
cm two cc

. .
Lord ELLENBOROUGH also said, that
quantities sold in the Scotch and Irish towns
subject to' enormous variations, which would 0:
the averages' in a manner which it was desirable
avoid. .
The Amendinent was negatived.
Earl STANHOPE then stated that the fel
Bill proceeded on the same. mistake as had Per':
the Bill'of lasi. year, and that was, the two 4'9'
things—the average and the value—were
founded, and he proposed an Ainendment to 00'
the defect.

This Amendment was alqo negatived.
The Duke of WELLINGTON therk.propoo
Amendment in the schedule, not for thq pureto
altering, it, but in order to render it more des'
distinct. The Amendment was, that -wliell6#
*ice of wheai,Should be above 636. and 'Oiler d
the duty should be 11. 38. Bd.; when' the price 5j
be' above 645. and under 655., the duty show&
1/. 2s. Bd.; when the price, should be above 0
and,under 665., the duty should.be 11. ls. e
so on, the scale of duty decreasing with the
price.

The Amendment was agreed to.
Nr.}li,
tOliePpEu.rpthcropptr, ohp4;lthseo,nmeevot
The • 01
Amendments were negatived, and then •
oiVnMEt ehafireld
Journals. Se
. , ~. . ,
Dill was passed.—Adjourned at Ten lA, ieek.

HOUSE OF COMMONS, Jong 26. ok
Lord ALTHORP presented a petition frt°liiiri
town of Notthampton, against the burning of
doo widows. Ila
Mr. MOORE presented a petition froaii?
Chamber of Commerce; in Dublin, against.the
Prinnissory Notes Bill. ill
Mr. CROKER obtained leave to bring jos or
to repeal the Acts constituting the Board of L°
tulle.

Alr. G
from Wo
Mitnadv(
tonseque
1,144 parti
"Ltd been

Dr. PHILLIMORE brought in a Bill for Pe
lating the office of the Registrar of the. PI:,
gative Court of the Archbishop of Canteibut;''
The Bill was read a first time, and ordered g°'
read e second time on Monday next.
Sir H. PARNELL' presented the third report
the Finance Committee.
Mr'. N. CALVERT brought in a Bill, fors,
franchising franchising certain electors of the borough °Loy
Retbrd. The Bill was read a first time, and or ot,
to be road a second time on the 10th of July r
A copy of the Bill, and a notice of the intenti° tr
read it a second time on the 10th of' July, wuliry
dered to be served on the individuals whom it is
posed to disfranelthe,
Afr. W. SMITINI presented a petition from
individuals, being 'the Deputies of Congreggit/ioi
Protestant Dissenters in and near London, sP
the Bill for erecting additional Churches.--

kitersm
Paanufaci
It appeal
iltas alum
!It the to
in this ci
'lumber
oaly in
hornet
.
Phtees is
. thrown t
Was con
fore,"pre
!he Pao
Inflicted
The gre;
4ltoo#, t
tuaterial,
tinfactur

•,,,,%,tu,6l.eirl.erblas7oBl.
Sir R.
WBlLLOSOCKNAwDiEshOedFtooaPsOkßeeTrosii.im 4 RS cony
respecting the present state of Portugal*.sll,;: 11'00' !tide -NV
particularly respecting the blockade of 1-'l)°,o, Its loss i
The Right Honourable Gentleman *PPlitil :Misery v
(Mr. Peel) will recollect that a Nohle /Id Was likt
(Lord J. Russell) in alluding to . ;this Subject al tladed 1
nights since, stated that Don Miguit.44 assn ik .kstter.
quAestigi teas
the title of Majesty, and allowed himself tahe,l). Priticiph
dresSed*by that title. That he had also convoked al to4iltdalrlyfivi
ancient Cortes, which convocation was a breac'e , The r
that compact under which he held his BOW, sawn, i
and the Noble .Lord then asked whether Or rot Protectit
tions with Don Miguel had ceased, and whether
Ambassador. had received directions to return t°6ol 'Mr; -1
country. The Right Honourable Gentleman jolt the petit
that our diplomatic relations were- suspene is ties of I
and that our Ambassador was to continnoitt
Portugal, or return to this country, upon 4e jir (11QTVB
contingencies which it . would not be thence, the den
erect to Mention. 'The Right. Honourabl6, theit Sir F
tleinari, in , speaking ,of bon Miguel, use 01 lhatition
wordS, ‘‘ the person exercising the . Gover!rtoPl apply 'e
. of, Portugal." These words were most jolt? 't e colt
in.reference to transactions which had sineP lor . .01Intry,
place. It appeared to the House; from the OP/ *jilted
. btGi
aooia. oedrf
on
rm the‘evnßatsiegnxlolistt
longer..Hi
ngoni.nGpi
ueenrttu.
communication
t It
thwa
i,: itivthii
:criineof.coiiiie:
.‘iiritaihenioieudmtaoll,
Lsuiropirdis,se, tfOi6hiinin
our Foreign
E.
rWgigu.),. asgiereree,..-
t:i: .isexirethepet ti
.to-the-etitire"Metrotiolis, that they saw a noPri—te isrly :in
I.oi:d Aberdeen, and_ signed by ,his Under.Secre 40etinnt
Lot•d'llunglas, tti.the following effect :, .- t4e Ciro]
" BLOCKADE. OF OPORTO. .i.jo, ' 'jetted. '
" Foreigneoface, June 24, .1" to fi 40n . ,
``.la..-1 um
.directed by the Earl of 'Aberdeo„tee Ii . 41rej:
quaint you, for the information of.'the Comula, .ije ,tli • "c,
Lloyd's, that intelligence has been reeeived.it.tbis il 444 thl
that an effective blockade of the bar of the city of 1). gi it e 4
had been declared by his .Royal. Highness the Priocc"l Ili Was c
.of Portugal.—l au), Sir,,.your's, .&c. Ste: ,- ' ' i, ,
d.to this
(signed) _44 DUNG" mmeeti b
"To the St Ore tar y of Lloyd's." - . ' ifn , r.'ol
ci °
Now _the first question which, he (Sir R. t Ple to
fro wished. to put, was whether 'he was to infer d it'ys Alt
the appellation of his Royal Highness being / t • Tra
plied to Don Miguel, that ' his authority j
co° Attic;
revived, and that the functions' of our Ambas'tioct tok)ret
in Lisbon were renewed. The second .que'.die *Net,
Was, whether the notification of the blockade rri,A h.
through our Ambassador, or if not, through "off . P,etitiar
other source 'it was received ; and tio, toi PAree
whether supposing it was nut notifito
14thrant4 ni Mg, .wi
i our Ambassader, whether thet blockade howl