The Sun.
London, England, 1819-12-10 00:00:00

sons tAlio lost their lives 01 I,t• 14 'of A.tV.,qt
The peinioners stilted the :mother Of !ben* family
whoro they hail lost tc, iinve attended ibe tnee:ing
of the 16th August, and virile aftemptiiiig to ~;e(
,away trom the hustings he received wo Siroke•
on the head with a sword from one Of the cavalry.
In this they were confirmed by the Report of the
Manchester Infirmary, Which described this per-
son to htive been received so wounded, and to have
died a fortnight biter. The petitioners stated
themselves to have been taught that there was no
wrong without a remedy ; but after the verdict of
the „Jury who sat on the body, with which they
(lid not find fault (and with which no fault could
he /wind), they could not but feel that no remedy
was open to them, and they now prayed that be-
fore the measures then in the Honse should pass,
that those things should be taken itito considera-
tion, which bad already so far succeeded in sena-,
rating one part of the people from the other. This
pelitirm was not got up for the purpose of parade ;
it was all written in the hand of one of the neti.
!loners, and flow the unpolished style, lie consi-
dered it the genuine tlfnsirin of their feelings.

The petition ''as then read. It was from
17,10 id Dawson, John, Samuel, and James Daw-
son. It described the manner in which their son
furl brotner ini.t with Hi death. l'he verdict of
;he Jury was stated to be, " Died by two oils
received ft•„m a sword, but not know• by whom
,hey were given." They played fur itiviry into
all the circumstances of the case.

The petition w.is order td to be printed.
Nouroui. JusTicEs..

. .
Mr. COX g (Ot Nol tOni ) hoped be might he
indulged with permission to read a letter %Illicit
had just 1):-en put into hi. hand from a Member of
that House (Sir M. Fottlke). The letter was to
!lie following effect :—" Dem. Sir, Having just
seen n report of what pasaed in the House of
Commons, I find at) addition,' reason to lament
II vine been confined to my bed for the lust week.
Had 1 been in the House I could have confirmed
ill 'hat you advanced, as I well recollect having
accompanied you to Lord Eldun's Chamber in the
House of Lot •IS ."

Lord CAsTLEREAGLI thought be had reason to
make a Intle complaint against the llou. Gentle-
man, since after what passed on a former night
he 'tad again introduced the sobjeer without no-
tice. When the Chair found it necessary to ter-
minate such a conversation from some of the as-
sertions to the remaining imexplained, it might
lead to very erroneous coneltn:ions in a case like
the present, as to the mode 111 which a public
duty had been performed. lie brictly vindicated
the conduct of the Lord Lieutenant of the County,
and suggested to the Hon. Gentleman, that it be
thought there was just ground for complaint, it
would be b:•tter to give notice of a motion On the
subject, that the House might be enabled to go
into the whole question.
Mr. CoKi said, if his Hon. Colleague (Mr.
Wodehouse) had had the courtesy to show him
the letter which he had received from the Lord
Chancellor, he should have been hound to com-
municate to hint that which he had just read, in-
stead of using it as he had done. Since the Hem.
Gentleman (Mr. Wodelinusc) had not done so,
such artPution could not be expected from him.

i\lr. ‘VovEnousE, after what had jest been said,
thiciv himself (Ton the candour of the House.—
What he had done with respect to the letter, was
MO 3 voluntary act on his part. After the state.
went made on a twiner night, conceiving the list
of persons proposed for the Magistracy, though
sent to the Lord Lieutenant, might probably never
have met Lord Suffield's eye, he nut a question to
the Hon. Member after leaving the House on this
subject, when he was answered, " Sir, if you
doubt my word a.k me the question in my place,
and dont I will answer." To this he replied,
" Very well, Sir, I will." It wits hardly nyces,
silty fur him to say that he could not doubt his
Hon. Colleague's word, but he would appeal to
the (loose it it was the way to facilitate commu-
nications between Members of that House, by one
Gentleman declining !o answer a question put by
another. He repeated that he could not doubt
his lion. Col league's word, but he should tint he
willing to give him the trouble of answering
question from bins again, or himself the pain of
hearing such an answer.

Mr. 'TIERNEY remarked, all %void(' have gone
off very well between the two Honourable Mem-
bers, but for the interference of the Noble Lord
opposite, His Honourable Friend had felt N very
natural anxiety to stand clear with the House, by
proving the accuracy of his former statement,—
ltt this he bail succer•detl, and the memory of the
Lord Chancellor was proved to be unfortunate.
Lord CASTLEREAGH EXldfillied.
OUT-PENSIONERS.

Lord PALmEnsTori understood, from a goes-
tion asked yesterday by a Noble Lord, that it
Wag thought an arrangement lately made affect-
ing Out-Pensioners was not according to law.
lie wished to know in what respect it was thoogbt
objectionable.
Lord NLIG?..NT tepeated his question, and con-
sidered the Proclamation of the Prince Regent of
the 2Stla October. calling on all Om-Pensioners
to appear at certain places appointed, on certain
days, or be struck on. the Pension List, to he at
variance with the provi,,iun, of Nlr. IVintlham's
Act, of the ,Itith of the King. He alluded
to the case of men who had enlisted for seven
years.
Lord PALmErtsToN understood the Noble Lord
clearly to admit, that all pet Honers whose pen-
!ions were granted before the Act of 1806, were
bound to come forward at the call of the Crown
on any future occasion.
_ _

Lord NuGENT did not admit this; but he put
the question on the ease of those who had en-
listed for seven years.
[And PALMERSTON minutely explained the re-
gulations of the set vice, and showed that under
these, seven years' service would give no claim to
a pension. Those only of those who enlisted for
seven years could claim a pension who enlisted
inuneatately afterwards tot seven years more. It
would hence be seen, that the fourteen years' ser-
vice of those who had enlisted in ISOti would
not expire till October 1820.
Lord NUGENT understood the rules and regula-
tions described by the Noble Lord to be at vali-
ance with the Act of Parliament.

Mt. LONG 33ij, an Noble Lord mistook the