The Sun.
London, England, 1817-07-09 00:00:00

CoLLFGE OF MAYNOOTH.

Sir H. l'Autista. said, that in rising to bring
lot ward the motiou of which he had given notice,
lie was principally actuated by a desire to refute
some I,lse statements which bad been pro-
pagated by persons who seemed anxious to
revive all the old prejudices against our Ca-
rbolic brethren. Among other things it had
been stated, that the College of Maynooth en-
cooraged wii3l were called the Transalpine Doc-
trine.. This charge vas brought forward in a
speech puldished under the name of an Honour-
able Member (Mr. L. Foster). This charge was
entirely unfounded. The Transalpine Doctrine
meant a support of the temporal authority of the
.Pope—a doctrine which every Catholic in the
Uoitet! Kingdom would abjure, and which the
Ps elates at the head of the College of Maynooth,
of whom some had been in this country to afford
information respecting the views of the Catholics,
were well known to be hostile to. It was strange
that in the next paragraph to that in which this
charge was made on the College of Maynooth,
the Honourable Member stated that he had not
been able to learn what course of studies was pur-
sued at that College ! How the Hon. Gentleman
could have such confidence as to the doctrines,
:v-bile he was so ignorant as to the studies, he
.could not conceive. The resistance of the Clergy
to t! '• rescr.pt of M. Quarautotti, was a pledge of
their iiidependence: That the Clergy of the Ca-
were well disposed to the Government was
proved by their conduct not only in 174.5, but in
1798. .At the latter period all the leadrrs of the
reirellion were persons tinder ecclesiastical cen-
sus e. hint the activity of the Catholic priests to
.promote the education of the poor was quite no.
•torions. It had, however, been stated, that the
elluc,olr.ffl which the Catholic Clergy comminti-
cat.;(l was Int rely a supply of moral poison, but
.5u,711 ;1 statement could only rest on prejudice and
igtoiran ye. For• nothing could be more moral
th•oi tenour of those cheap hooks, which
.were circulated among the population of Ireland,
and ii•)iver,ally read in the Cathoiic Schools.-
1-I.tvin,!-n-a.l these books, he was enabled to speak
to thew elaracter, and having consulted several
o .the Ca: rric booksellers in Dubin), he could as-
sert the e.rent of their eirrulat,ou. One hook-
sei;er, in 1, had assured hint, that he bad with-
in one yl•ir plinted awl disposed of no less (hail
20000 of I is''e cheap tracts. 'then as to the read-
of toe Eihle, a nOcin prry.arled in this coientry,,
mat. it was 'prohibited in Ireland, while the tact

was, that ronnerans editions of the Bible had been
published within the last year, in Dublin by four o 1
the Catholic Booksellers of that city, from• whoin
1)&10 his inforMation upon the sohject. The-
version 'of the Bible read by the Irish- Catholics
might be different:in some, perhaps ithirraterial,
particulars from that published by the P.r.otestants,
and it was notorious that there were several dif-
ferent.versions of.the Bible-circulatechin the Chris-
tian world ; but it was quite- a' fallacy to state ,
that the reading of the Bible was absolutely for-
bidden. among the Catholics of Ireland., or:VI any
other CatholiC ccihnt ry-, The address of the Pope
to the Catholic Divines 'of Poland, as .to'_fhis
point, upon..which' so [Ruch. comment had-been.
-made, was in fact totally misunderstood, as it
would appear from accurate examination tbatthat
Address or Bull did not forbid the reading of the
'Bible, but was aimed at certain .personi• in*Polarfd,
who were endeavottringbY atudite meant, : to'
convert.thePolish.Catirolle‘s, which the Pope de-
precated. Upon ,
,) therefore, hgreat
deal of grourilllesi gooe forth agaiest,
the Catholic character. But this was not the only.
calumny agwitrat the Catholics of Ireland-, at-whoni
every variety of slander arid Misrepresentation was.
pointed. . It; was, statechoasoong. other thifigs to:
pretudice 'their cause, that a iCollege.:ot Jesuits
iiirC6eriblished its theemihty of' Kildaee, whereas
Milgsains:P.k fact seas, that..the ,schOOtsmaster of the
aeminata, alluded4o. had been educated in a Col-
1-egeof Jesuits, but it by nootneatts 'followed•that
.h presided over a College le'Soi‘ts yin hreland:.
A:further calumny against the Cottons; oh:erecter
appeared in the Courier Newspaper some titre,
ago, in a letter purporting.'. to' iirOceei,l frorciAe'
Bishop of Ossory. This calumny was, -contained
in an assertion from the- writer, that the-nig-he
before-the inauguration of the King bf the 'Ne-•
sirerlands took place,„ Pastoral LetterfrsontheAreh-:
bishop of, Mechliu was circulated in Briissels;oitid
threat under the doors of-the inhabitants., exhorting
the Catholics not toswearallegiance to ta.Prcitestant
Sovereign, and- Wedging, that such an oath would
be incousistent-with:the•prineiples of the Catholic',
-eIf7ETC. But that this. was altogether an Itiirodrole
ed• statement , appeared front the answer of the
King-of the Netherlands some time afterwards to
an Address frorathe Cat.pc,licilishop of Totirnay,
et whose hostse,hia.MejeoY I)" passed.soutealays,''
Cor in thisatiswert which was 'published in` the,
Brussels Gazette„llre, Xing of the Netherlands:
distinctly stated, that, he, Was • perfectly satisfied,
tise:'eo4schiet of the Catholic Clergy ;
though his Majesty had at the time some differ-,
Herite-With-the See-of Rome, that difference hod:
never been adjusted by the establishment of a sa-'
•
tisfaetOry Coneordit. To these several points-be
had, thoit-glso :it; necessary to advert, in order- to-
rt:pet the •atteinwsthat were matte to depreciate
the eliaraiter, and- to injure :the cause of the. Ca-
tholics. :Tire Hoye :Baronet -concluded with mov-
ing'''" for 'ate AddreSs to the 'Regent, praying for,
COnieilor 'Extracts. of :any CoMmunications re-
ceived from the College:of'Maynooth, respecting.
the courses of Education pursued in that College
sinceahe!3.3th of April,. 18.13." • •
Sir—louts Co, HIPPISLE? seconded the motion,
and: obset wing that the- 'subject: then betare the,
Histise. was sine of the'greatest -importance to the'
interests of the Empire at large,'he lamented_the
absence of the' Noble. Secretary of Stavf, of the
Right: Holt: th'e Secretary'-of Ireland, of the Hon.
'Meuher for Yarmouth (Mr. Foster),•and all
the incalculable loss of otte rentoved for ever, by
the high- dispensation of Providence, whose eulogy
he would not attempt to pronounce, but whose
fare he might be permitted to deplore. The tines-
, tion uv;us uoto whether they should grant 90001
3-year to the College of Alaynooth, or whether
they should increase 'it by 3 or 40001. more, and
thereby raise it to what .it had enjoyed under the,
Administration of 'the Noble Duke then at the
head of the Irish Government. The sehject now
to be discussed was of tar wore consequence, for
it referred to the religious and moral education
Of the people, awl involved their own happiness
and the safety of the Empire. Sir John Cox
Hippisiey then answered the call upon hint, to
ascertain what was to be understood by Transal-
pine Doctrines, stated to be maintained at May-
food). The infallibility, of the Pooe constituted,
the first principle, and front thence flowed her
superiority over General Courieilii, and the assump-
tion of a supremacy in Temporals as well as
Spirituals ; but it was trot to be understood as
the general maintained doctrine, even at the Vati-
can ;. a more liberal and rational code prevailed
there. Individual and powerful Pontiffs, such as
Gregory the Seventh, and many of his predeces-
sors, had asserted these arrogant principles,
but • their adherents, he believed, were now
but few ; nevertheless, they were to be guard-
ed against, and there was scarcely a, State in
Europe, of whatever religious communion, but
had so guarded itself against their coots-
(riot). The Honourable Baronet then went into
further detail, and said teat lie had giveu notice of
a motion for the production of the Concordat be..
tween the Court of Portugal and the See of Rome,
and as he wished to spare the time of the House,
lie should now shortly state his motion, as it was
not unconnected with the object of the fltiilrla
question, and thereby spare the House any fur-
ther comment. In one of many publications, ad-
verting to the late Report of the Select Commit-
tee on Catholic, regulation, a charge had been
made of withholding this document, which,
in fact, was only an agreement between Por-
tugal and Rome, to divide the patronage of the
benefices tailing vacant in the Papal months of
patroeage. It appeared, by the printed letter of
Sir Charles Stuart, that it bad been sent by hint
to the Foreign office ; but, us it was not deemed
of sufficient importance to be printed, an implied
charge was raised on the omission. The Hon.
Baronet then proceeded to the work of Mr. Gan-
dolphy, a work which had been stated as approved
by the official authorities of Route, and licensed as
such. Well might it attract the observation and
denunciation of those Honourable Members who
noticed it. Nothing could be more insulting to
the Establishment, and the Goverment of the
country. The Honourable Baronet then read a
passage, in which Protestants were charged with
intentionally debauching the morals of then-
, own children, if they respected them inclined
to lend an ear to Catholic teachers. Forte-
, irately, howeso_r, for the Catholics and fur the

Palk, tbotigh (erelnlphy's Svruns Lad fur-
tively obtained the uncial Imprimatur of.
ire now stood censure, by the same authority, and
was ordered CO supfeess his books, and make a
formal and public tecaetation of his errors to his
immediate superior, do Apostolic Vicar of his dis-
trict. Such was the fate of Mr. Gandolphy's
works—at one momett declared fit to be enclosed
in cedar and gold—at he next doomed to censure
and abrogation. But to return to the immediate
subject of the motion. He begged to call the at-
tention of the House to the documents which had
been moved for some years since. Nothing could
be inure opposed to Transalpine opinions. The
course of education was precisely conformable to the
principles of the Gallican Church, and the courses
of the Sorboune, where Dr. Dc la Hogue had
been himself a professor. Under such a visitorial
power as was obtained at Maynooth, it was scarcely
possible that the exploded Transalpine doctrines
could be suffered to be taught. The Lord Chan-
cellor, the Chief Justices, Lord Fingal, and other
highly accredited and loyal persons, constituted
.the visitors ; and the Hon. Baronet said, he had
the satisfaction of receiving within a few days from:
L4d Fingal, then in the actual exercise of his vi
.
dowers, the fun confirmation of the recti-
tude of their courses, as coeformable to the
Tracts tVhicli `had been- laid before the'lloue.--.!,
From Professor De la Hogue, he hail arso re-1
ceived a' letter '''complaining of the intput'afinn inl
the printed speech of the"'Hon. Member for Yal::
mouth, and after particularising the eatiroc-.,
," Is this to teadeTeansalpine'doctrines
He referred also in the,semeletter to the fact of
the Hon. Baronet's having, , in .a former debate,.:
led Mr. Chancellor Perceval to a confession' that
he hestueot made 41 due distinction between the con-:
struction of &crees of doctrine and discipline as the ,
former weee 1)0(1 to be immutable, and discipline
might change and be adapted to times and cir-;
ctunStances. He then stated, as an instance, the:
discipline of the Council of Trent respecting mare
riages, which had been adopted by the Church of,
'England; it nevertheless was not received- or:
acted nom in six of the principal diocese, of Ire-
land, inthiding Dublin, nor could, therefore, all,
Decrees-of General Councils be held to be gene-,
rally obligatory. The Hon. Bart. then adverted to
the-Report of the Aggregate Meeting of Dublin,.
on the 4th inst. in which they persisted in their:
former Resolution, adYerse to the interference of
--the Crown, and supporting domestic nomination.
A vote of thanks to Mr. Hayes alsoewas referred
to the consideration of the Board—to Mr.' Hayes,
the Delegateiof the Aggregate Meeting,teethe See.
of Rome—to a person distinguishtl• by the iesoe,
lence of his attacks npon the Constitution of
.fiis
country, upon its Goveenment,aed even-Upon the
printipal Functianary of the tinveinnient,
'tile Cardinal Seeeetary of State—to aeirersone
who, mi being4dmittesl to the Pope to teceiVe"his•
benediction; :was dismissed with the Pontifical
reproVal of ", Depart, rash man !" It was worth
noticing that this Father, Delegate Hayes, loudly
demanded associates in his embassy, or the whole
would be lost. • Dr. Dromgoole, well known try his
4peec4s and -writings, and a Mr. M'Uawley, a
brother of a Count of that name, attached to
the Ex-Empress of France, was another associate.,
Sir John Cox Hippisley here read front a Dublin
Jepet: !tin extract of a letter froin.PF.DrottigOiile,
suggesting how necessary it was for Rome to be
on its guard against the Government of England—
in a word, of most mischievous import, and which
merited the reprobation of every loyal subject. Of
such materials were the accredited delegates of
the aggregate meetings of Ireland composed!—Of
the same complexion was a work which had been
presented to the Ministers of Rome, and stated to
" be got nearly by heart by one of them"—the
.Statement of Penal Laws. It was sufficienteo refer
to the speech of the Attorney-General, and the
denunciation of the Judge who tried an informa-
tion against this book, to appreciate the value of
the present, as coming front a British subject to a
Roman Minister, Sir J. H. followed with a quo-
tation from Mr. Clinch's Inquiry. The works of
this gentleman had been presented to the Mini-
sters of the Pope ; it was fair to Mr. Clinch, how-
ever, to state, that he was at issue with his pa-
trons when lie asserted, that " the Protestantism
of the Crown would, even in the case of the con-
cession to the Catholic Claimseremein as a land-
mark to skew that our freedom has been a gift."
The Hon. Baronet observed, that it had been ar-
gued that we had sedulously maintained securities
for the Protestant Church. If by Protestant
Church was meant the Church of England, he
would ask, where was the security ; where was the
security in any test now required, to exclude Dis-
senters of every denomination from sitting in
Parliatnent—or even the Messelinan, if a natural
born subject ? Sir J. H. regretted that in all the
diselissionS of this important subject, none had
ever yet taken place that could be deemed satis-
factory, either to the Protestant or 11,e Catholic.
No inquiry into the real tenets of the Catholics
of the present day had ever been instituted—n
few set speeches annually closed the dehateno
inquiry—nu evidence whatever. ' Was it possible
that such a course could be satisfactory ?—Sir
J. 11. then teferred- to. a -pamphlet circulated
by Dr. Milner, naming himself the agent of
the Irish Bishops—an agency, however, which
was strenuously denied by the Bishops them-
selves, when recently on a mission to London.—
But Dr. Milner had great facilities of dispensing
with the inaccuracies, to say the least, of his own
statements. In this solemn address to the Mem-
bers of the House,'Dr. Milner was pleased coarsely
to accuse Sir J. H. With the wilful statement of
an untruth. Sir J. H. read the original words
of Archbishop Egat's letter, which Dr. Milner
attempted to fasten on him as a 'fabrication.—
Sir J..H. adverted also to this Prelate's vacilla-
tkba—et one moment the strenuous advocate of
the Veto—at the next as strenuous an impugner
of it. This Gentleman was pleased also to re,
present Sir J. H. as the candidate for office—at
one moment for an Embassy to Rome—at ano-
ther for the Alinistre de Calle. It is possible,
observed the Hon. Baronet, that I may early revi-
sit that clime to which this Prelate alludes—
tiequestiouelily, however, unaccredited and un-
paid. He should not be withheld from: attempt-
ing to render such services to his country, as at
former period lie had not .1! nsuccessfidly affemPs-
ed, and t 5 represent the real state of tLis

ant question to those whom it imports so much to-
he apprised of it, might, at such a crisis, be not
unreasonably considered as an act of some public
benefit. He should, at least, not be deterred from
ihe denunciations of such commentators. His
walls over this thorny ground had been undeviat-
ing ; nor should he now diverge from the course
which, in his own humble opinion, was traced ofi
the soundest constitutional ground of justice and
expediency. lie should offer on the present oc-
casion no further observation, but second the
motion of the Hun. Baronet who had moved the
inquiry.

Sir G. Hrt.r. rose, not to oppose the motion of
the Hon. Baronet, but to complain of the unfair
and disingenuous manner in which the Honour-
able Baronet opposite had undertaken to reply to
the speech of his Hon. and Learned Friend, the
Member for Yry:mantli, dining his absence. His
Hon. Friend had attended sedulously to his busi-
ness•in Parliament for aeonsiderable period alter
the speech had been printed and published, and it
would have been more candid had the Hon. Bart:,
replied to it while his Hon. Friend was present.
His Hon.-Friend, however, had only to defend one
half of his speech—for that part wherein he' had
alluded to Mr. Gandolphy's.wnrk, was fully borne
oat by the Honourable Baronet who seconded the
motion.

Mi. RUTTIMWORTH apologized for offering a few ob.
serrations,. more especially as it could not he the desire of
Members, in the present statea the House,' nor of himself-, to
20354 bate noon the Catholic Question.; brit tftere
wereasome points in the Speech of the Hon. Boomer, who
had made the present motion, which he apprehended were ora
incorrect, that they might makeroavrofig iniKession if lat
without observation. Mr. B. did nut rise to -.41C-feird—tlie
printed Speech of 'the Hon. Member for Yarmouth, who was
most able to defend himself, but every one who knew that
Gentleman must be persuaded that his love of truth would
never allow himto state in a Speech, and much less in print,
any'firets, or to make any assertions, which he did not believe
toile; true; and that Hon. Gentleman's judgment and rACCIP.
racyavere such as to render him very unlikely to make auy
incorrect statements ; and he was sorry that they bad been so
represented by the Honourable Baronet. But Mr. B. 'oho
served, that he rose-chiefly to • notice some misrepresentation
-made by the Hon. Bar-ilet respectinaa the Hibernian Schools,
• and the British and ForOgu Bible Society. With regard to
tho former, the Hon. Baronet had described. them as greatly
countenanced and encouraged by the Roman Catholic Priests,
.of whom he had spoken in such high terms, as would insinuate
that all their bigoffy and intolerauce.were:gone, and that they
manifested nothing but candour and christian cordiality to-
wards their Protestant, .Brethren. .The Hon. Baronet had
read some extract's of a work lately published by a Member
of the HiberniaoSociety, to shew the friendly disposition of
some of the Priests towards their Schools ; but he (Mr. 13.)
would beg leave also to read Some extracts from the same
work; which plainly strewed, that although there 'might he a
few candid Priests who did not apprise these Schools, yet there
were many of a very opposite description; and having himself
been a Member of the Committee of the Hibernian Society,
he could of his own knowledge state, that althqugh thotre
schools were instituted for the most behevolent purposes, not
with a view of making proselytes, but. simply to teach poop
children the art of reading, and to give a little instruction tw
the must degraded and WTrtehed part of the Irish population,
yet t 12'6y-had in Many instances met with the most deterieinea
hostility from the Roman Catholic Priests. It was evidently
the desire of the Author of the Work in question, to throw
a veil over these hostile demonstrations, but they nevertbelosa
made their appearance, and he begged to borrow the Hon.
Baronet's Moils to read a 'passage or two to the House.— Vir.
B. here read two passages from Sir Henry Paruell's Boot.—
We understood the hook to be an Account of the Chartera
Schools in Ireland, arid of the Schools established by the
Hibernian Society.)—The first is at page 160, where it is
stated; that ." The Roman Catholic Parents have in a multi-
" tude of instances withdrawn their children from schools
" kept by Catholic masters, because of the superior education
," to :be obtained in the Society's schools ; and this not on-
" frequently at the risk of the Priests' displeasure—of being
1" refused confession, yea, of excommunication!"—Nosy
this is no great specimen of the candour of the Roman
Catholic Priesthood hi Ireland, when the refusal of cornet.
sion, and the risk of excommunication, is ineorred by lA,
rents, fur sending their poor children to a charity scietol),
simply to learn to read.—The :text passage is at page 216,
'where, speaking of the Sehook of the Hibernian Society, it is
Stated, that " Many have been the attempts, on the part of
" the Catholic Clergy, to break up and disperse the Schools;
" and I ain sorry to say, that in not a few cases they have
" been successful. These hostilities have elicited many gra-
" tifyiug instances of true' Irish independence of character.
" How often have the poor parents pleaded with the priest
" for permission to send their children to the Society's
" Schools, and in the face of the most arbitrary refusal, thej,
" have ventured to ask fora reason ; but no reason, except his
" will, would be given. Often after a severe struggle be•
" tween subjection to priestly domination and an affectionate
" concern for their children's education, the latter has pre-
" sailed, and, braving all consequences, the,. have continued
" to send their " children to the schools. -Whilst I record
" these instances, of hostility, I am happy in being able to
" mention some very pleasing instances of the reverse of all
" this."—Now, said Mr. 8., I submit to the House, whether
the work which the Honourable Baronet has quoted, notwith-
standing all its forbearance and desire to conciliate the Roman
Catholics, bears him out in the high character for candour
which he has given of their priesthood in Ireland
The Hon. Baronet has stated, that the Pope's late Bull,
which had been issued in Poland against the Bible, and
Societies, was framed in consequence of attempts ma&
in Poland by the Bible Society to proselyte the Roman Catho-
lics to the Protestant faith. Now it unfortunately hap-
pened for the Hon. Baronet's argument, that the Poliais
.Bible Society was not in operation till, after the Pope's Buli
bad been issued. There bad been a disposition manifested
by sonic of the nubility and gentry of Poland to establish t
Bible Society, and a plan was drawn up, but it was suspended
by the opposition made to it by the Roman Catholic Primate
of Poland, the Archbishop of Gaezn, who, fearing that his
Opposition would be insittlicient, wrote to Roue for instruc-
tions how to prevent or oppose the Biole Society. The Pope's
Bull of June, 181 G, was rssued in consequence of th'.s'applo
cation, and it would have been effectual in preventing the
formation of a Bible Society in Poland, had nut the Emperor
Alexander happened to he at Warsaw in October, when the
friends of the Bible submitted the plan of the Society, to-
gether oith the Pope's Lull, to his Imperial Majesty, who
declared his desire of becoming. Patron of the Society ; and it
was publicly formed at Warsaw in consequence of the Em-
peror's sanction, and in opposition to the Pope's Bull. The
Hou. Baronet has statd, that the Polish Bible Society, and
the Irish Bible Societies, were occupied in proselyting
to the Protestant faith.—Now it is well known that
the Bible Societies are not occupied in making any Pro-
selytes whatever. They merely circulate the word of Clod„
leaving that word to speak for itself, and to find its own level
in the mind of Man. Their sole object is, not to Proselyte,
but, to make both Protestants and Roman Catholics better
Christians. Mr. 13. stated, that it was not any wish to
create untriendly feelings towards the Roman Catholics, that
had inducedhim to make these observations, as he entertaioc4
a great respect for some, individuals of that Body, both of the
Clergy and Laity ; but as he knew that a strong spirit of into-
lerance towards Protestants existed in Ireland, arid as he could
state many facts to establish this assertion, he hail felt
it his duty to correct some mis-statements in the Hors. Ba-
ronet's speech, which might otherwise have made an undue
impression • and be must confess that, from the knowledge
which he Lad of those tnis-statements, the rest of the Hon.
Baronet's speech lost much of its weight with him.

Mr. V. FITZGERALD presumed that the object of the
motion had been effucted by the opportunity it presented th•
two Honourable Baronets of making their statements. He
defended the conduct of the Member for Yarmouth, who
had, he firmly believed, been influenced by the most con-
scientious motives, but carefully stated, that he did not as-
sent to his Honourable Friend's opinions on the Cathviiq
Question.
Sir J. C. HIPPISLEY explained.
Sir H. PARNELL declared, that in his speech this even.
ing lie had by no means confined his reniarlis to the Speech
of the Learned Member fur Yarmouth. The reason why he
had not alluded to this st.bject earlier was, be apprehended,
evident. The grant to Maynooth College had been repeat-
edly postponed, and be was thus •depri,ed of the lipportU-
nity of making the observations he had made. As to the
imputations cast upon the Catholic Clergy. of 'either opposing
any attempts of the Bible Societies, or any others, fur the
diffusion of education in Ireland, or withholding their aid
from so laudable a pursuit, be could.assalle. tale House that

Our Falmouth Letter has a report of the cap-
ure cif Pernambuco by the Government troops;
but no credit is given to it in the City.

We received this morning the Paris Papers of
ILL
'lnday last. The following are Extracts :

PARIS, JULY 6.—The King arrived yesterday
afternoon in owl health at the Thuilleries.

" Last Wednesday, after having, according to
ettstom after Mass, accompanied the King to his
apartment, the Duke and Duchess d'Angouleme
retired, and Monsieur remained with the King
three quarters of an hour.

f' To day the Countess de Montsoreau, Gover-
bess to the august Inia,a, whose approaching
birth will fulfil the wishes of .France, took pos-
4"sion of the apartments appropriated to her at
14e Elvs6e Bourbon.

• "It is said by some persons who affect to be
*tn-informed, that the Electoral Colleges will he
"'wolfed on the 15th of September, that is to
.441', after the harvest, and that the new Session
43F lie Chambers will open within the first fifteen
44 of October.
Nothing has yet transpire:l from any aotho-
"Y as to the arrangements made with the Holy
yoe.

the King of Wirtemberg is expected shortly
to review his troops stationed in Alsace.
" ley a Decree of his Most Faithful Majesty,
;14teti the 9th January last, the eldest son of
Xing of Portugal is in future to bear the title
aF I'rioce Rola) of the United Kingdom of Portn-
nrazil, and Algarve, to which is to be added
11:m uf Duke of Bragauza. The eldest son of the
bilnee Royal is to bear the title of Vrince of
4.ltira.

" I'IVE PER CENTS.—Saturday, 65f. 50c.
" Irons, JULY 2.—Monday last the Prevotal
°ltt proceeded to the trial of twentone indi-
vidtl4l3" y-
of the commune of Saint Audive, con-
in the late disturbances. Three of them
.aide.
-1. tonclemned to death, seven to deportation,
a 'tr) to hard labour for five years ; nine were
1,1:iltd• The three sentenced to death were
4:114 Yesterday.
14NA, Jvt4s 25.—From every appearance
tht,e
likely to be an abundant harvest in Croa-
• cith of corn and wine.
pastI.rTGARD, JUNE 21.—During some weeks
11,0 h 4 great number of our fellow-countrymen,
LIN! a
bdeilligrated to seek their fortune in foreign
4Ve returned here in the most deplorable