The Sun.
London, England, 1845-11-22 00:00:00

34
133%
83/,

•
-........------.......-.,....--------, 0 ~
daughter., had died before coming of age, and the ra 4'l
Mrs. l',y,::cbemaker, had appeared to have the daughter's
tion paid over to her. His honour ordered inquiry 0
the eact of the Du'.ch law in Demerara, and as to the nes
of kin.
IN nit LONDON AND SOUTII-WESTEEN IL
ny, 1
AILIC
that
This ;petition prayed, on behalf of this Compa
deposit of 35,0001. in Excheoner Bills, and 662/. 19. in ea'
made according to Act of Parliarnen, might now be paid°
to them. The order was granted.
IN RE PRESTON 13IPROVEIIENT ACr•
This petition on lhe of the Vicar, prayed the paYeine.lll
certain costs incurred preliminary to to the sale of th 170
age, in terms of the Act of Parliament,c which diecte%,
payment of inctunbrances on lands out of the Pt;r,L7fr
money. His Honour thought the etitioner should i.'.,6,
claimed out of the invested fund, a against the CallThi
sinners, and could not therefore make order M WV °A
Petition.

1.1
14,—(
iinShepariftlig 1_
to
The early part of the day was occupi
contended oPesu
upon a bill of exchange, which, it was
ns..e a.-eadlissl;
QUEEN'S BENCH
one side was a valid bill, passed fora co .to re'
operationtheotlter otlfi atthiet
rsia
EX PARTE SIN JA3IES SOU
(Wed f Or
Counsel on behalf of Sir James South In cove
nisi for a criminal information against Captain_eso
sowrmiteintget Oc.tober le° Poshol,
affidavit of Sir James stated that in wera Veal 9-1
statuteceascd toot. bllemai
tdaeibioti,thaving come lv
d*that of the
and which called public attention, a
of
_eon'
Mittel
e
ciety, to the fact that the names 5 COal
at
letters
letter :lei dTi nimg
'limes
nperossv„sopkaepear:reach ot e
of certain Railway Companies, and havii gno
claim iflo
a to
affixed to them, to which they
A bell] Grail.' Wvillerl to
been published as belonging to the priovti
Amongst those was the name of uapta'
fellow. wrote la
in a letter to the Times that he wasna Grover cola.
matter in public terminated, Captain ,otice,
Sir James a friendly letter, in leJetbetv
two fed
This letter Sir James did not answer,.be third c°octiell
plained that he had done him
andau tareat_•
pa
which followed with silence also; but preselareol
the language which had given rise to the
such as " cowardly knave," &c.
the Court at great gentleman on the improprr: t_,Dl
language from one to anothe
area tj
quences that were likely to follow it. ~ it ippe entie
at, said 'sat
Lord DENMAN, in giving judgme , Of gas
;dee
him that there had been a great deal of hsioaal:tter-v
Ohs a,u_aelsjir
to hold up certain parties to public
cot au'', to
upon both sides. The object of T:Slier
circumstances stated ; but as those letters
_t red; Tod
gation of misconduct, they did not warrautaia Grotdps,
personalities. It was quite evident that eeinnseii ;toe
used language in his letters which he (Lord
et.
~0014
doubt he would upon reflection very mach regrench as. 'be a
the Court did not think the circumstances
and lb°
warrant it in granting the thereforppicae b°
means of keepiag up ill-feeling. It was 0000
the matter would end here, and that no Irtor'
about it.
BUSINESS OF THE COURI:.
nape 7,0--
The days fixed for taking up the sPecl2,.. Wows' star'
trial paper, and for giving judgment, are pee. s.kedeer,
nesday, Dec. 3; Thursday, Dec. 4; Friday.,„, 9; for
day, Dec. 6 ; Monday, Dec. ; Tuesday, !".
' Thu"' ' )
l.
Prius Wednesday, Nov. 26; A ,
day, Dec. 10 ; and Thursday Dec. 11. First PPP
T
BAIL COURT.—(TH,--
j Counsel
e.
e _al.:3;1:501w
1...„41
(Sittings in Banco.) 000). tag,NA
EX PARTE THE PARISHIONERS Or se sly she
Mr. BATNEs applied for a rule to show 5001410:
damus should not issue commanding the Bey _ the Too 14
vicar of the parish of Wakefield, to enter, ou
of oe.
4410
cords an adjournment of a vestry meeting loth of..lA'sSe.
The Learned Gentleman stated that on the Hof
rata
notice was given that a meeting of the Paris"of a clielr"prisll
field, to take into consideration the making f• or tlf,;job,,,°
would be held. The rate was to be illa"urch, efv-
church of Wakefield, and also for another eo,be 350, it 0§
maintained under a particular statute underititb, sua tita ba
111. The parishioners assembled on ale ound sil°,4oo
proposed that a rate pro one penny in hest 001d,ut
levied. Some person pposed that the v aded; ujoe,
for 12 months, and that proposition Was ,6„ert &sold oetbn
negatived by a show of hands. After a au" dernsiler,
vestry decided against the rate. A poll was septeal outlV"
18th, which poll continued until the 2d 00 Th 001,
that day the vicar declared the poll to bed ^6and l$ of.tfbi
in favour of the rate was declared Wbe 2,3 Z faveatrece
bar against it 2,361, leaving a majority of vicar_ 4,010*
rate. During the course of the polling, t legal lil'inete,°'
the votes unassisted by any member of th,earrendetaeroft°'
and when any vote was objected to, the vice, into would bt,
randum of it, saying that it would be entercun peril a fo
He said that such votes and the poll in 5 : den
examined by a scrutator. As the poll close ,at he Irko
made for a scrutiny, and the vicar declared tl!. the vivo to
home and count the numbers, and then seal 4„inted,fool.
be examined by the scrutator. It WO then I)otewbri-efo
him that he had in one case inserted onlYollenobertinv.elf
ought to be allowed. On his declaring rillie;tjlen rgi
again called upon to grant a scrutiny', altinpplt.
refused to do so. The proceeding w"-' of
scrutiny, wholly incomplete, and the objectsia the one...
tion was to compel the vicar to ,rhe-enasegvetes
steps to render the proceeding complete. 1:„,, 115 diesbli!/
the vicar's proceeding was that no less tu—nd4l"tej ,
favour of the rate were improperly allovved, ajboi f°.Joilb;
had been improperly rejected. In fad „,11,;:fe 0054 P:d
been taken, and 41 good ones rejected. trolled "-nor'/
Stock Company in the parish of Wakefielu'L
and Calder Canal Navigation CompanY.,;l theftio rata
Wilkinson, a clerk to that Company, cis"-oar
voting on behalf, and entered six votes in faV" an errs
doa so. A stationithoughheadm of theittedt Lhatsehdes
andha man
d receeivbeedatelly tlsile
tbst
in the town, and the station-master clainldinitttalif
voting on behalf of the company, although bend 05 gsa
he had received no special authority to do eregard.tvrietetl,ar
votes. The same circumstance occurred Ted' pUlr
of $ thof
company, a water company, the trustees, enture'ol-
- and other establishments of a similar "feper,.-,,ottry„
these circumstances, it was evident that if a Ph",in had been made, the majority of 15 would • estter• ,
the rate. There were instances of
one
ve' alee-goeli
of private partnerships; and, on one occasioe; atioAog itte°
of the West Riding entered six votes, as "Ph be Irtre°
out-buildings of a lunatic asylum, altheeP 0000
that he was not one of the visiting iogod 0.1
nor had he even an:,vauthority from his brotlifeti o,yert
There could be no question as to the jurititbeLiore"
Courtin these cases. It had been held "Yst.
id
Queen's Bench, in the case of the Icing r• tissue " fel
dames,W
could e s tmsisneusoetmearp,
mandamus
althatinndgaatmlitpue
so
parishioners
Courtihcsaltlllioeners
t?c onliktne;;ep,s s t,reidieoso.oeo:
in order to consider the propriet;omfmeearkiningg r g 0111 1.1, tIP„
owe
paatl
lsoi,inogn
sa therefore,omne meeting
onpgl
question
fnet,shtt
tehoant as t
parishionersh itsot,ohui
this
trocafotweu.ladk,leAs
u,s ucce ?ft
i-etrsot
bra
ipb
entered against the rate in the Ecclesiastical °of (03,1
circumstance did not interfere with the I)olce,,,ruft•
the case under the cognizance of a temporal '"cenosr.7 tbe
doubt existed as to whether a scrutator Was bt,./loklft
poll, but in this case there .could be doll`..
returning officer himself had admitted tlbetblitbe
of a scrutiny. He had the power of having c'ne„iindeltesiti,
proper, but as he did not this application was of the aV.
view of compelling him to enter an adjournrneu,' -ht be
from the 14th, in order that the question tilig-eterS'
considered, or to compel a scrutiny of the list a V !‘
Application granted. 101"
THE QUEEN V. THE LONDON AND DialarNa-go f
COMPANY. tipihAt
Mr. BOVILLE applied for a certiorari to brillofder'-irP
quisition, by which a deetland was imposed, „°,:fitio,°„deet,
last,hmei lgd h toa nnbdte
hoeqnuba stohdheye dfoa.
of Charles
face of
athp paet
Dean,a
inquisitionr e dtna ttht
eht the
oeolrnneli
eleni e
cite 1;1
fatal errors, which rendered it liable to be clt!
nd
t ofbqfioeurr seeithsmnt'egaslhrunda sai
rdienta, bonaet
ehic
.nr irregularity
Tredldoahimarcati
ttpt
tythhecrtitenedae
rtsdaghaiteeiffdem,
trmheo,
,nedubtse
being
ofialnas
hgedt
see
vsns:eoi rst
ePi
a 1 iltri;c:li
be:
oft13:04;
the first sitting, and not at the last, and Objet-0
be described by the word "now." The otheriee, itaje
as
were founded on a total absence of allegation of P; Ovoid
accident was said to have taken place ,°,llh the„o's.
railway, but the county orparish n e""
wasrailway described existed
mwovaisng to the death, striking,c,e. 'l,Ol
not mentioned. ettelltoelf
riages on a railway, but with no allegation of Pla,irthfl„'• tt
was also a bad arrangement of sentences in the r,e,;-.
totally disconnected the death from the cause; I_.—th d
of the carriages was entirely separated from the ac'd'proviroen".
Dean. The 6th and 7th VicL,sec. 2, call. 83' ba
that inquisitions should not bea ).
bald voldtbeds4
the omission of certain technicalities,which it deseritotillii
. ..„ere tO
length ; but the errors in the present inquisition fstiAto
out of the pale of the statute, and were necessa2',.l'Vl d
it, as no indictment for murder or marislaughtacse'el 00
founded on it. The Learned Counsel then
authorities in support of his application.
granted.

THE QUEER V. EDWARD MAMA.'"). 40- 00
Mr. PASIILEY moved for an attachment,,ilWo.di
person of Edmund Marsland, for contempt of for $
attending as witness before the Revisingßarrisler ,red I;ee
in the county of Chester, after having been aq„' ,0 ow" of
subpoena to do so. This evidence was material 1:410'
tion raised against some voter's claim, and in G°ll—
absence the claim had been allowed.
Application granted.