The Sun.
London, England, 1819-07-22 00:00:00

i
flud
was most Am.,' to say, that a whole nStion
he wrong in expret,sing their sentiments. A 11.
Zion bad a right to establish its own crude of lilt:
end who was to call it to account Noge,fbd
were human b,!iin:s could do it, and he won"'
foolish to attempt to de so, for to none wris I I
tion, as a nation, responsible, but to AlePgda;
God, the lawgiver and judge of the tiniversi
•
While, therefore, the present Meeting acted w"
a due regard to righteousness, truth, and bevel;
lence, the eternal Jehovah would not find fauil
qvith them, but would, on the contrary, Pc'tl D
them his blessing: The Rev. Gentleman coil'
chided by seconding the ResolUtiOns. I Of
On a question being put by Mr. Huhn, it
resolved that the whole should be put together It.
agreed to at one time, if the Meeting ea"'

'ibis was accordingly done.
Wrt.t.ta,m CONNOR, a young man from
crowd, mounted the waggon, and hoped the glig;
solutions, excepting the one put relative to tit
Catholic Body, would be agreed to, and that
one in which that body were mentioned, 11°I1
be put separately.—(Hisses.) thj
No person seconding this motioh, it fell tc!
ed
ground, and the whole were unanimously age
"Ps'
to, with the exception of a few hands. too
Mr. HUNT thought that the year 1819 of
liberal to have allowed any longer the reignijo
intolerance against Catholic Emancipation. ,50
thl
hoped they would now convince those who 118" of
long tyrannised over them, that now the reign ,t
bigotry and gloomy ideas had'ceased, stoti,t
Catholics and Protestants were no longer to 81i4
t
their beads knocked against each other. Thor
Meeting, he was.confident, wouldshew, that ,7
embraced in the arms of mutual affection too
brethren of all denominations, remembering,
to his God alone was the worshipper responstui:
for the manner in which his homage was pro,etio,
ed. To him it was a source of peculiar gratiBc.r„
tion to reflect, that be was the first man, as C",l .4
man, in Surithfield, where so many burning' 6'to
taken place in the times of error and delusio°:,ii.
have the honour of proposing an Address to tm"
Roman Catholic Brethren.
The Resolution relative to the Catholic 00"
was then put, and carried unanimously.
-At this moment the Union Flag, at least al/1
consisting of three colours—red, white s"t„,
green—bearing the inscription, "England, SG°I,
land, and Ireland," was hoisted amid,t loud ch'llf
Mr.-1-Itrwr observed, that he had no doubt
enemies of freedom would characterise this ss„.h,
tri-coloured bloody flag of France ; but N001:si
men knew better, and would easily see that it
the emblem of the three Kiogdoms, now 611,1:,,b
into one State, and all the inhabitants of vr`,,,
were attached to rational liberty—.(Loud appisd';',4
There was now another flag put up, of. I
colour, with the words " Liberty or Death:. its
Mr. HUNT.--This flag speaks for itself• of
inscription, as you May all see, is " Liberty
Death ;" and is there a rational man living 910 f
can possibly dissent from such a doctrine, or 50f
that it is not what the glorious Constitution
.tngland allows ? The contemptible misere6to
who cannot subscribe to such a motto ought d,
live perpetually a slave, and-to die unlameotebe . !
The Meeting would, he hoped, excuse hisn, e
now alluded to what had taken place if, roil°
yard on the 7th of September, 1818. There 8 °g.
ineroos Meeting of non-represented Englisboo
had told him, or at least commanded bin" 10
carry a Remonstrance to the Prince Regeot
consequence of which he took it to L0.11,.1.
mouth, requesting him to preset' it to 1ti4*.))0.,
Highness, which the Noble Viscount at oncefo
mised to do. Would they now wish to hear !,14
answer (cries of Yea,.yes) ! Very Well. He Wit:ll,'
read it, and also his'answer to she Noble V'
and be trnsed they would admit he had at lestj
done his duty. After reading these, he • 0:,,d0i
leave them to pass such an opinion on Pvt.,
Viscount Sidnionth as-they should think pr"Pe 7 .
" Whitehall, Sept. 8,181 do
SlR,—LordSidmouth has ,directed me to .inforn)..'"
that as the paper containing the Declaration and lleripte
'trance, addressed to the Prince Regent, which you
his Lordship's hands yesterday, purports by the des,'rl" oitherein given of it to contain the Declaration and .-Ptire;V
strance of the Inhabitants of the Cities of London :to
minster and parts adjacent, and as this descriptiol. 1:100
dently and notoriously untrue, his Lordship. does
himself at libertylu lay the same before his Royal Webs
I am, Sir, :our obedient servant; '
• • " HENRY. CIAY'
" H. Hunt, Esq. B,,Norfolk-street, Strand."

01°'
" 8. Norfolk-street, Strand, Sept. 9, .„
" My Lord,—When I delivered to your Lordship
monstrance unanimously agreed to at the Meeting
Palace yard, on Monday last, addressed to the PrillciifiC
gent, you promised me that you would read it over,, af'„ et,l
did not.contain any improper language you would de" c-w,,01;
into the hands of his Royal Highness, and that you ;,, ISt
give Inc an ‘answer in the course of three days. l'a„-bigt
evening I received a letter, signed Henry Clive,. '.tho
states, that your Lordship had instructed bins to salLefore
you did not think yourself at liberty to lay the 'same -isfr,
the Prince Regent, because it purported to be • the Def., 0
tion and-Remonstrance of the Inhabitants of the Gitittfr
London and Westminster, and parts adjacent, which atolls
tion was evidently and notoriously untrue.' Nowt itd
by what means your Lordship ascertained the fact, Si' 'de-
persons who attended the Meeting in Palace-yard iverete
the Inhabitants of London and Westminster and Parts ,90°
cent, I know not. But this Ido know, that titoge ?":;301°
who proposed and seconded ' the Declaration ot our
fold grievances and Remonstrance against the cruel, i"'Alle
and unconstitutional acts of the corrupt and wicked %IA
nistration that had been so long imposed upon, his
Highness the Prince Regent be the great and overwlie'hoi'
Borough \Proprietors of this country, &c. &c.' werollinotS
tants of the Cities of London ,and Westminster, a" ,:e. sr
adjacent, and I believe that almost the whole of the roars
six thousand persons at the Meeting, who unanintous,'Yoreor_
tioned the same, Were also Inhabitants of London klau,lolr
minster, and parts adjacent. However, al your IP'o'l°_,
has declined to deliver the Declaration and Itemonstra," fot
his Royal Highness the Prince Regent, I. will troublt
Lordship to return me the original document that Ile! meet:`you, that I may, agreeable to the instructions' of 11", t O,OIIP
ing, take some other method of laying it before his
-Highness the Prince. Regent.
am, my Lord, d 111.11
• " Vita Lordship's most obedient an
humble servant, fra.tt,
. friuh-
if be
Such waS,the letter, and such the rePLY 'l'
aIJ
received
,to .it from the Noble Viscount. He 0 'of
now further state to them, that the p'7l, a'.
Manchester hail agreed to a similar Remoostr
ecre.•
which he also was desired to carry to the ,cll
tary of State's Office, and which he did ; to `01:;' to
he received the following letter in reply, ll' 0,
which he had sent a subsequent letter, both
which he would read :

" SI R... 4 am directed by Lord Sidwooth to
that'lie declines presenting to his Royal Highnesse ors
Regent the two Papers which you delivered to his Lot,: AO
Wednesday last, the one addressed to his Royal Higlin—