The Sun.
London, England, 1817-05-03 00:00:00

Lioti-or commtAsiti‘lAy 2.

Vat.lons nreonnts moved frir 'front the difreren!
public offices were 11ft:041N:a NI/ the respective
Orlieerg, and ordered to lie on the 'fable: 4
Mr. (it EN FE LL presented a petition from the
of St. Andre‘V, near the Wardrobe, against
the London Tithe Bill, signed by all the Parishion-
, etslexcept three. ,

.Mr. Baououart also presented, a petition to the
s'imme effect from the parish of St. Sepulehre. •
Severel -tither pet:4'o'ra were presented: in' the
course of ,t he:eveoing to the same purport. They
Were all ordered to lie on the Table. , •
' Colonel WOODpostnerned his Motion for, the se..
Cionrreading of the Gnome Sale Bill, from Weti-
:tieSdaY the 7th, till Veitnesday the 14th iota.
Mr. V. LEWIS moved for an Account of the
'tiitaittit'y of•Virmillen GoiAs exported during the
litst j'ear.r-Prdered. • ,
hrought up the first Report, this
of the Committee on the, Police of the
Metropolis. The Hon. Member made some &met.-
vations .the present unfair mode of litensito4
pithlie: houses, and declared Ms:intention of shortly
ceiling - time attention of the ,House to this 'subject.
Mr.).. LITTLEToN. presented a -petition frotn,
Certain Landholders aria Inhabitants of Birming-;
biun, agahnit the 13iIE noisy before 'the, House •fot
...wksessing tise landlords, &e.,:of Birmingham to time
,PriOr's:: Hates. It complained of partiality in
making the • itthabitants of the town liable, and
excluding three other parishes conpected
,with it.
The Hon Mr. LITTLEViN, and Air%. PUoDALE
'made. a few observations to the effect that all the
parties concerued had had sufficient and, proper
tiotices of the proceeding. .:. - • • -
Mr. J. ,LITTLIITON replied,, in • denial of this
fart, and the petition was read, and ordered to
cltl tit; the
, ktos"e moved that: the farther consideration
of the liti,viimg Banks' Bill, he postponed till Mon.
Altry.--Agreed to..
, „Lord BERNARD presented a petition( from'the
(retie! Jury of time County .of. Cork, against time
Irish Grand Jury Presentment and,
.ordered to lie on the Table:.
OF PIIIVII.FME.
Mr. PENNETT said, that it was with great con-
cern that. he felt it to be his dory, as ClerirMan
the Committee appointed to inquire into the
:State of the Police of the Metriipolis, to bring
rtinder ,theeonsideratiou of the House a Breach of
Privilege cootained to a linulc recently publi,hed,
:and witielt had been sent to the Committee by the
:Author, purporting to be " A' Viudication of the
:Magistrates acting in Wand forthe Tower Division,
from the Charges contained in a printed Work,
entitled, r The Report of the Committee on the
State of the Police of the Metropolis ; together
ry ith the Minutes of Evidence taken before the
Committee of the House of Commons.' By Tho•
mats M, A. Hector of Bowers Gifford,
E3sex amid Magistrate torthe Counties of Mid-
dlesex and Essex.7-,--Without .norking any Com.
teent on the general tone of the work, which was
,by rto means re,veo lid towards the Committee,
lie would only 'observe, that several passages were
so extremely offewive to the feelings end hostile
to the, privileges of the Committee, that it sv,ms
thnogir"t tit to silolllloll.hir. Thiriwilil before them,
rv44itive solllc.k:Xplariai ion of his conduct. When
eppeareti before time Committee, he
*ism) m,l him,ell to be dirt. Author of the work in
(petition. But before he (Mr. Bennet) proceeded
to 81:11.e what bail taken place on that occasion, he
sv,Qold, request the Clerk to read from the 1t0,,1k the
whir.ll were the sohjeet of complaiot,
The Clerk accordingly (after repeating the
title of the Work) read .as follows:---
" I,have ed iuto the constitution of these Committees
of the tiouse of Commons, and the mode of their proceed-
ings,'anti doulit others will be surpriied as welt its
Myself at the description. My impression was, that a Com-
mittee is eontfan,ed of a number of Members who personally
attend, that the evidence of every witness,' and the whole
entire evidence of cacti Witness, time entered in the Minutes,
ikeratim et eurbalim, and printed for the use of the
ifetise.

" My information,
,however,- has taught ms that my iro.
prssCon is most erroneous, and that this was not the mode at
least pursued :in. the, examination of witnessts :npou the
*barges against the Migistrates of the Towerpivision.
log the examination of several ofsthe witnesses, the Chair
man only was Present ; Mr. Calvert' is the only Member I
could learn who did assist him occasionally, particularly when
the house of Hanburt was in question. • This Hon. Member
vary mm:h wished Mr. For, of Shadwell, to girt: his evidence,
but the private explanation of that Gentleman induced him
not to insist upon it.

"'A considerable part of the cridenic given in was not en-
tered on the 'Minutes, and 'a very material rut that was
Offered was not accepted; / hart riot theernallest knowledge
of the Chuirnutn, other tl►:►u by his occasional sl►ceches as
an
Qpposition Men►her, by,,, the name of Captain Rennet, from
which f infer be has-lint dedicated much of his, time .to the
profession of the law, ►u►d directed his studiej.to the mature
of legal evidence.

Lt is pretty well known my loyalty to miAirig, and ai-
ti,Cilitteitt to tho Constitution; ond I bad almost said calm.
si.ht le admiration of its forms.- I. have contributed my p ar-
if? the worst of 'times to its safety. I hope, therefore, that
say observations will not be tortured into any intentional
respect trihe Committee. radiuowlerige its authority, and
Low to Its deeisiOns. But when'T make this declaration., it
dies not I.illow that I am boutidagainst my conscience to ad-
rift either candour or impartiality in the proceedings, or that,
If the. bndy of Mitgktratei are to be tried, I should slot prefer
Mr% 13e...almont brining his charges bcfote my Lord Ellen.

borough, rather Una before a Committee of the Ziotibe if
Ci)Mtillins, with erten Captai,i Bennet. is Vie Chair. I oftt not

pip Hal to the Committees in the time of Ceoriiivell, nor to
-Jo
. _

t tire Committees in Pr:men in tile tinte of the Revo:ution.

doloot svibt, ter h tried by Committees. I protest stgaltut o

tral by Comoilltees,lnquisitiont; or Storthanthers."

Mr. BENNFTT proceeded to state„ that when
Mr, Thir!wall appeared before the Committee,
bone explanation was required' from him of the
pi,ouges %hid) had been read by the Clerk. He
viti§ nver that part of the explanation
relived to himself personally; and confine
himself fj) that which regarded the last paragraph
tti hich had bean read by the Clerk, beginning
v.4tl 4„,,,it.iswellittroWn my loyaliy to my King,

And attaelsment-tp 2.4 Cinstiitntipn," an!! ending
with "1 pecitesi —Etgain'it b ComMittees,
Inquisitions, or StifCrianibers." TheC9mrnittei
obsers'iir that this passage con.
rained an inuendo :strongly'*pointed against them,
and proceeded to
,ask for explanation on the sub!
ject. —The IlUtiourable Member proceeded to read
the interiogaiirmi and replies, which were to the
following effect:—
Q. What grounds had yon for accusing the Corn.

titter of want of, candour and
deny• doing_ so.
Q. Vo your wish that to stand as your reply ?-1
Yes.

Q. How do you reconcile that denial with the
comparison of a trial by the Committee, and a trial
before my' Lord Ellenborough ?-4 merely stated
that I preferred the one to the other.
Q. Did you not, in the passage just read, meats
to insinuate that the Committee had neither can-
dour nor impartiality-?.--I object to any question
tending to criminate myself.
Q. Having stated that you prefer a Trial by
Jury to a Trial by a Committee, you add, " I am
not partial to the Committees in the time of Crow.
well, nor to the committees in France in. the time
of the Revolution. I do not• wish to he tried by
Committees, I protest against a trial by Com-
nsittees, Inquisitions, or Star. Chambers." What
Witt your meaning in that passlge ?—I meant that
winch I stated., -
Q. Did you mean to assimilate the present Com-
mittee to Inquisitions or Star Chambers ?—No;
No such thing. I laid no idol of the kind.
Q. What then ditl you mean meant to fill,
up'a period.
Q. It is likely that this subject cal he brought
before the House of Commons. Do you mean to
stand by the answers wt ids you' have just made ?
--I do. ,

Q. Have you any thing to add to what you have
stated ?—No.
The Committee .entleavoured in this exami-
nation to induce the Reverend blewleman
make such an explanation awl apology as might
render it unnecessary to .stibutit the matter to
the consideration of the Hoose, but in vain,—
He' must say also, that 'NI.. Thillwall's Man-
ner and torte on the ()Oilskin were the very
opposite of what might have been expected.--
I hat morning, however, he had tendered to
the Committee an explanation of the obnoxious
passages,' and of some of the' replies in his
examination. With respect to the insinuation
that the Committee had 'neither candour nor im-
partiality, to the question, ,on, which hey had
answered that he objected to .any question tend-
ing to criminate himself, he now. expressed
.his
contrition for the passage.. With respect to his
answer to the question.relative to the Inquisitions
or Star-chambers, that'he meant to fill up a pe-
riod, lie now corrected it by stating, that it was
a rhetorical figure of speech ; and that he, had
no intention of instituting a comparison between
the Committee and the Inquisition, or the Star-
Chamber. Ile added, that perceiving the publi-
cation had given offence to the Committee, he had
directed 'ilia publisher to stop the sale of
Taking, however, the whole nature end eiretun-
stances of the trausaction into their consideration,
the Committee deemed them to be of such im-
portance as to requite that they should be laid
before the. House. He wished to be entirely
guided•by the House with respect to the farther
proceeding which it might be advisable' to adopt
oil the subject, his only anxiety being that the
privileges Of PArliament should not be em»pro-
' mised on the occasion. The first step, hOwever,
would be to reqUire the attendance of Thir-
wail in the House. As the Reverend Gentleman
lived at stone distance from town, and as lie had
his Clerical duty to perform on Sunday, it might,
perhaps, be inconveuient to hint to attend on
I ond ay , tin which day he should otherwise move
fur his Attendance. Ile would therefore move,
" That the 'Reverend Thomas Thirlwall do at-
tend this [louse on Wednesday next."
Sir Osfvsr.»- Mostmer, as a Meniber of the
Police Committee, corroborated in every respect
the Statemeta %%bleb had just been made by the
Honourable Chairman of that Committee. As he
was not n Member of that Committee at the time
when the Reverend Gentleman published his hook,
be was not open to the charge of being intluencetl
by any personal feelings, in giving it as his opi-
nion, that as the passage in. question was, in his
apprehension', a libel on the Committee and the
Howe, it ought not to be passed over without clue
reprehension, He must add, that if any thing
could exceed the impropriety of the Reverend
Gentleman's evidence, on being, called before the
Committee to explain his statements, it was the
general impropriety of his whole conduct while
before them.

Mr.JI.IOCKIIART thought the House would b:ive
sufficient Opportunities of considering Whether the
subject was a breach of privilege or not, when
the qttestion came to be discussed. lint in. Ii ul
risen to notice what he conceived to be the totally
n
unparalleled maner which thiColowittee ha proceeded. He had always thought that! if a
Meteber was, of, opinion that the Privileges of the.
House Were attacked, the
,complaint uld be
matte to the House alone. Ile had alWays.been
of opiniOn that a Committee should :not expeed
instructions, and that it had .no,right to inquire:
of its own accord into any breaclt of the privileges
of th:: flow 4:; but 'here they.bod taken on them•
selves to call a person.before them, and examine
InquirieS- had been put to him to draw
from him a confession or denial of the offence im-
.pitted to hint. Now, lie. thought the Committee
'were not invested with this inquisitorial privilege;
they had no power's for any such purpose. This
was his °lilt:12011, and he might he wrong ; but
'never knew au instance of the Lind before. Ile
thetelote thought it worthy of the dignity Of the
House to pause, and Consider Whether what they
had heard etas: cOdeoc# tti be befa,rtz them
or not.

The SPEAKER apprvhended that this WOl the
title, and the only time for the Ilotoc to pro-
nounce whether the subject in question wits a
breach of privilege or not. AU he understood
the lion. Member to have done, was, to send for
the person Whose name was to the book, and ask
him some questions, and this appeared to be riot
the most unteasonable course, as it afforded an
opportunity to ascertain whether the purl)! per.

st!':ed iit Ilbal ,t1.4‘1 beeu,so nuattrisably publisbecit
It was for the'llo44 ti; 'creel& tihether these pas
sages avowei[ by the author were, prima facie,
breach of privilege.; and if so, they would order
the attendance of the party; If not, they must
not proceed farther in the tuatter.—(Hear, hear!)
Mr. CALVERT vindicated the Committee from
the assertion in book, of there
being seldom any Member' of it present except
the Chairman. That might have been occasion-
ally the' fact, but in general the attendance was

Mr. WI-tor/TsLav inquired whether it might
not be proper to delay the consideration of the
question till the paper should be printed.
The SPZAKEit said, the question of a breach of
privilege' was: what the House always disposed of
at oncc.---(' Lear, bear !).--There could be no doubt
that tai reflect on the proceeding's of the House,
or of any. Committee of the House, was a high
breach of privilege ; *And the point now to be de-
termined was) whetner such retlection3 had been
published. •
The (4nAN,c,k.lit,t.crn ..of ;the EXC,IfECILIBR OOP&
there was no doubt that. 11 breach oftprivilege bad
been committed, and it would be for the House,
on another occasion, to take into consideration
all the circumstances, either as they might add to,
extet►uate the offence. He was not aware that
the proceeding
,of the Committee 'was liable to
any objection, as their object, appeared to have
been, not to extort confession, but to afford op-:,
portunity for . explanation. With respect to the
measure of punishment, ,t would lie fi,r the Honse
to consider that the offence, consistv‘i of a'ingle
passage in u,,book,.and thatnot of a very heinous
nature,.
r:
111% WYNN suggestedohat a copy of the eri-.
.deuce upon which :tile complaint was fontidetf
ought be 14,t1 upon:the. table, before the lionse
should come to to decision.

Air. SHAW LRFUVRE 1)01e testimony to the tern
perate and judicious conduct of the lion. Gentle-
man (Mr. Bennett.)
Mr, Buonoaicit said a lett words to a similar'
effect.
The .§PEAKRII Observed, that it would be proper
to move for so notch of the evidence as the ex-
planation in question applied to.; and that it
would then he for the House to call on the ac-
cused, to,know what faitlier, explanation be had
to otter.

•
Mr: RENNBTT. accordingly moved for a Copy Of
00 111,(1011: of the:minutea,of ,evidence taken before
the committee; es related to the explanation
given to the Committee of certain passages in a
work written by the ltev. T. Thirtrvall, which
was immcdiately produced, and ordered to be
printed.

The question for the attendance of Alr.Thirlwall
on Wednesday was then put, mitt carried unani-
mously.

The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER inteti,
that the House, at its rising, do adjourn •till
Alonda.—Agreetl to.

RYE lIARROPR DILL

Mr. Mannat.ay moved the second reading of the
Rye liarbotir Bill, which was opposed by Sir
GODFKRYBrIEII and Sir EDWARD KNATCHBULL.
Lard Cocuitatce and Sir .1 MES A NA* op:
posed the Bill, The latter declared, that it was
extremely detrimental to the landed
,interests'
and, in fact, contained sonic of the most extraor-
dinary and extravagant clauses that had been ever
enacted. It went to invest the Corporation of
Rye with: absolute powers over Romney and
revensey Marshes.
Mr. JaNxixioN was decidedly of opinion thel
the Bill ought not to pa:is, and thought that it
ought to be resisted in its present stage.
Mr, 'Maitaiti.ey was surprised that the Bon.
Member Who bad just sat down should call this
Measure improper ; but more particularly, that he
should attack it in a manner so illiberal.
Mr. JENKINSOM rose to order,'
The SPIIAk.,EIt said, that the Hon. Member (Mr.
Maberley), had certainly used an unparliamentary
expression.---(llear, hear !)
M;. MAIItiItLF.Y was at all times ready to sub-
mit to the Chair : and therefore, if he had said
any thing incorrect, he was perfectly ready to of-
ter an apology, The Hon. Member was proceed-
miwhen the cries of 'question became general,
d strangers were ordered to withdraw.
On our return to the Gallery we heard that the
Bill had been withdrawn without a division.
The House then %vent into a Committee on the
subjeCt of placing the Englrsh and Scotch Univer-
sities on the same footing with respect to the
Drawback on paper, when a 13:11 was ordered to
be brought in for that purpose.
Mr. Gout.Roart introduced a Bill for regulating
Marriages: in •INeWtounilland; which was read a
first time, and ordered to, be read a second time on
Monday next.

lvic,i
GRAND JURY PRESENTMENT BILL.
Mr. Getman., after a few introductory observa-
Onus, moved that the second reading of this Bill
should be postponed till this day six months.' ."
Mr. ARIIRCHOUBY considered the measure of
great importance, anti expressed a hope that if this
1.1111 should be withdrawn, some measure would
beadopted for promoting the object during the
present Session.
Mr. PRETTIB was also of opinion that this
measure would be extremely beneficial to Ireland;
and thought that this Bill should be suffered to
.pass into a law, if no better provisions were sub-
mitted to the House.
Mr. PONSONBY had lamented to hear his Lion.
,Friend: move that the Bill should be withdrawn.
His lion. Friend had laboured most sedulously in
framing the severahclauses ; and he (Mr. p.) still
thought, that out of this Bill a system might be
made Which •would be very beneficial to Ireland.
Mr. Pitur. conceived it would be the most con-
venient way to withdraw this Bill, and to bring in at Bill embodying ail the parts of the report
which•was laid before the House in the last Ses-
sion of Parliament.
Sir J.Newr.orr considered it in 'vain to palliate
or temporize ; and that, unless the present abuses
were rooted out with ft-strong-hand, it were better
the whole system should fail to the ground : lie
thought, too, it would be exceedingly difficult to
engraft this new system on the old one. It
was
necessary that the srounds of demand on the public
Aurae Should be clearly larikdC oat, The proceeds-

,
well ,ceounted for,. and, good.secatitY gir,,en'
that
present the in ei ne y wfung irolit (be ontortui
peasantry was often missing, entlpew ossess°)
were the Consequence., In one district duct
into a
ceivers had become bankrupt, and it all' high
speculations at the, cxpencC
.of the Pt
should be put, an end to.
Mr: V. FITZGERALD admitted the ,etrils of
existing system, but thought it -itaP,elSsible:
various enactments of the new , lill shoultli
law this present SeSsion i, ataliC.4t
wise for those who wished well to, IrOindto
barras a measure which, if time: werfi:Ov
would be productive of the best coosetrenct
Sir F. FLOOD had a multitude of oblation
the Bill : it did not sufficiently 'gnar(lethe Pel
frnin loss ; it was complicated, and wodil be b'
There 'lif divided into two or three parts.
The qneStion was pot, ond ibe
Os() 13 or 14 new ollices created. i. ,r di
Mr. Coortut said, that there %Vire u`
new offices, and the office of tOtistiriawr• 1
: .
abolished. --.., 1 d
be con '
, itnitt.tl this day six muntlis,, NG
Mr. PoNsONBY nsked, whether
,ttkot o°°.
throw rise 13ill out of the ?title.„(110114 tl4
vitt ortiete..
The SPEAKER said, that if the . P.11
14
Wel e varied it %voald be conddered a 001.9.,
14ANKRUPTGY LAWS% . ,' 4'o
Mr.•LOOKIIART moved the secoodyestikag,r
Bankruptcy Ilepression Bill, h 400aost
\lr. IV. CnUIITENAY ohjeCtCa t 0 t .
00 Oil
Inlr I itc.t ica I.pie, mid !IS giVipg rise co,eill,. 04 b
al it'llj'i'de prio%%'%v-eurs at; aPtiltriefl.latnvill.Ctheriglierit:l:lll:o6ol
forward, they did tter)lei be jtortl
Come forward to assist them, or .o.oo°l. Agt
clue to the investigation of the catty flir.ii„end
fraud on the part'ot the hanitruot
Itlrlit'VA
itltti!'ef.(l ,into. But if .t lie creditufs --d lion wit
H$ unfortunately
the, Powet s of the new law, no guPti C" („., pi
11,'e, dkeredOn . which the ,Bill gee "` 'too;
in.ssioners Was what he could u0ot cons"( .111
tryst iiit woubl,to.
to any set of men.. %rile ', ,„,,kaptli
the Colimissioners to in toe im,
.00
to Inc wi,oie of ni, past life imd,conduct ;jam
their . .
Opinion of his ~whole characters rt): ,s
d; allow til
-allow his certificate.
~.. Alr. J. SMITII IA:III:Ned the ,C.oteri!. Itild
"1"k" )t • • Lyndon 'XllTillelt AtlC' otg
I h to were t 011 1113 .
the eirciinwatices of fraud. Yet it ;Os 01010
that nothing was more comma,' flow ;0 Hoe
Bankruptcies, and that sotne'aie4sure%gocosloll
sary to repress t hem. Great inc wok woo the
frotu the croWded state of the toopwg,l) 0001 1
brusincss of the Commissioners ,%ves fLregibttsll4
Louillon, The-
y toore,resetnhied .00", :;,,t tb4
iilits than Courts of Justice• lie ulu byo%cri
Powers .given by the f3ill could ett, 00; it
"fell); be entrusted to Country Carnali.' pol'
• 04 al' fill
.was intended by the 'Mercantile 13 Y ....I s;
ibis rakr" to
to Petition for some measu're oa --- opo le -1
he trusted the Hon. Mover wool:-1, 1/:)to be re.;
Bill, to allow time fur that Pet'ual, Vie. t°
WO
sewed. Ile moved to adjonrn tbc '
day three
Sleeks. °roil'
, 11)0 he
• r.
1 • ....00KHART in reply dwelt onoited fop 1
,1,.
ty and the inconvenience which re!:, I.•rsioit.illee,..L.
present system of Bankrtipt L. 3 t.'„%„ tlebl' 401[1:
Commissioners were taken 0111-7,„aeti hY tticle get.,
swore to, and certiticatei %sete si; and 'll-Asracm,
jority f 1
°- tie petitioning erefht`),,onderea "",hick!
Quo whose property had beet) 3tl•biatios rt 0,
had
of all redress. All tlit!° J b collY°
%, e . to
been made to 'the t3:11, Pliga'
,objectioo
v;ated by amendments; fie heti i'
i tri
' 011'
posone the debate. ,r„I ot the 1 e citi
Jour. %V !toll. F.sLEY' comptain-- _vs in tl-
- to the Connuissioll'i
' ito Ogre
of London. ' this.
'Bl
The Debate was 011. "ed t° ' of.
Joao ,
weeks. col° , -
' 'the Sl4 opetr]
A peti •
tion was presented (raid frootltevrefolj
Galloway, praying to be relieve rte Vic doic4i
tion of the Laws by 'which theY 'v ,(1 „,..pr ~,
from i 1
.1. •n Ire's° ' .
i" (mg 161eilical (gnats ',„,, d,,,,,,
to be printed. --Adjourned tit moll • ,•; ,
-----2---- -------- ' flYt 1°
, AO, , 0
Morrow' 00!
CHILD ATV RDE 11..L.-YeStertiflY.l,l
to foil! etail,
Spa-fields, the body of ac fine
_ll'llvbicii it 01),,eo to,
a cord tied round its, nc, by ' 1 0,01,01"
to have been strangled. '1: he JO Y no I
Clerkenwell I'Vorkliouse. 'de a "
,pr.- Niel
risiata et: ,ine i!
ATTEMPTED StIiCIDB..7-N r" ..•—•
,111. l! toal o'
was observed walking several ttra!,ditia, ,
toe
11.0101" i nor
cboly posture by the canal at .00401'1 ir,tt'
last lie , jumped: in. Several percseadd .1, 001,
diately to his assistance, and ill Atato,4) oot°
tint; him out with life, Oa ibiry.4' Aso
insensibility lie was removed t°'.7„,itoreili„6o,
Infirmar . I ' ation Wlls I.l' „JP' ot
y, w iere atom ‘.001) a ;
,e 3111
be stated that he iodgeti at ‘.. i pot) i ibi
~oticg ~n to
Oxford-street, that he, WO a b-,11.00 111' ~,
out of ptace, and that thistle", uoisioas sloiv
rash act. Ile still lies in ,0 I"‘c

II

ric
.----------, 10,,,,'y 440 341
01, 1 to .a
o
, cOAL h-1
I‘ll, ij. ot.• 03- oil
Sbips 1). .50' od, ' •
Ships at, Market. 4rif .... ..
..me• d, to
it Neircastle ........... . „ . •
~ 0
. 1.
i,ti ..
: :..
I • ' * 1 * .

I- - I,J'
•
AuT) the INI laSt. 3t his illiOlanSelkililiffard•iireer' tlie
vt,
htlitlil Ohm Fuller, Esq. of 3 (1,3,41,11,vi 1,/ ,
Yesteidaz.,:lltlY2ti . lept, r.
otetil
, Wv ii II
PA Aratign.
~. ail 6°14 re I
_On the Ist inst. at St..lanies LA11?- 'dsughte
io, lto
!%sq. of Kin's Couty, ireia lid, to rdotisp.to,S,P, te.oi
ltn_ettle, sq. of Vpper Serrour-sore
is
filili.
FOn Thursday last, at Tunbridge, '".., of the, , og
''qi t° Williamina, yoururrst 0ug111.41., yoritsliii, cc'
(31* °llvr: Ettt. of Oishorough PriorY, 11....t0n) t°
The' sante any, gr. teobb, of Soo thawr
ilaughtssr of Mr. Jalla Fenn, of I/0003P

priibafifvi
DIED. n :if e. odrlie
,4140 P ,v e j '.4 Op
rel°icnt 'tntr Jol9bintill'irlit.blinnet,l;lSl:.l'iklYni' irtiliooljtol'pe,:itionoj :00AI,
'PrraiTiaer%Esti;nlt-::.lll;ealLinckr-tit'uetli:l:3l',:'ffid3lll:itt,:fi'tetics6l4:llt3rll
In his 78th ireir after a tew hours, f iier A fiti
1::)n Sunday night last, tit path: the Ogle° , otiou
0 .3, rwa.rtis of 20 years a Cleo ii,,, „,,,iiiijori i
f S ate tor the Howe DepartntriO4 of ?to ,
,i,opei
°n Om 9ti inst. l'arid tc.f,ttiall, ''''-, - gerre
ag!:d 79. ._ Ifftotreet'voilicP
Nudtienty, on the ittleiat, r. „.,. - .
Mri'AViiikb, aged, ~,wiclavi of tbe ..,,, `4 woo
-------------------.------- '---- ...111°`. ti ilti
' ...... .00 ,o•ied DY , :•,0
ItSi 0,- olto ' T of
LONDON: Printed by J. IL CA opt o , tit 0010
Ctrinond-street, . atwortquar4:t :405,
SCRIPP;3_, of Digh 71 Sulltil Initdfetil
0 ince; Nu. 4 IS,' Strand ; ``h3 t!, oglifill. '
Lttirrs, Six, (pcot•paitiYass*t w 4