The Sun.
London, England, 1828-12-18 00:00:00

NEW WORKS,

• Lately published by James Ridgway, 169, Piccadilly.
t. STOCKDALE'S CALENDAR for 1829, price
'wit• bound in roan, or 36e. elegantly in morocco, eon-
-444_1. The Calentler—. Almanack-3. Compa-
'lioa to the Calendar-4. The Index-5. The Peerage,
with the Arm® of the Peers-6. The Baronetage, with
14e Arms of the Baronets.
DJ. B. The Peerage and Baronetage are carefully cor-
'ected to the present time, mainly by scriptoriel counrotni-
4tionse from the different Families, and the Anne are
tewly and beautifully engraved; they may either be had
i'parately, price is. tld. boards'.
2. SOME ACCOUNT of the SYSTEM of FAGGING
Itt WINCHESTER SCHOOL; with Remarks, and a
Cerreepondezce with Dr. WILLIAMB, Head Itioter of
that Public School, on the lute Espulsiuns thence, for
resissitecio to the authority of the Praifects. By Sir
ALEXANDER MALET,• Bart. Now ready, price Is. 6d
S. The SUBALTERN'S LOG BOOK, including Anec-
dotes of well-knows Military Wears. 2 Vols. 20e.

Contents:—My G►mmiseiun—Joiniug • the Depot-
4attle of Waterloo—M4ey Lendiug-n—Heiress Hunt►ng—
Roing Ahroad—the Voyage—Landing in India-the Re-
llirnent in Madroallerchiog in India—Out Station in
• India-•..Ceotanmeute Detain—Departure fur the Cuag—
rfooleward Voyage—Arrival in England—Recruiting
ttation—.lreland—Second Visit to India.
4. The LAST of the OREEKS; or the Fall of Con-
nentinople. By Lord MORPETH. Seecnd Edition, price
Bs. 6d. •

4. An EXAMINATION of, and ANS'WER to, the
MIRO REPORT from the SELECT COMMITTEE
the PUBLIC INCOME and EXPENDITURE of the
UNITED KINGDOM. By a CIVIL SERVANT of
the CROWN.
_ _

6. A LETTER to the Right Honourable ROBERT
PEEL, on the present state of the CATHOLIC QUES-
TION, as affecting Ireland. By an IRISH CATHOLIC.
7. SUBSTANCE of a LETTER addressed to the
Lop LIEUTENANT and MAGISTRATES of tke
COUNTY of VsSgx, upon PRISON DISCIPLINE;
With a few Remarks upon the criminal Code. By C. C.-
WESTERN, Esq. M.P. Price is. 6d.
S. A LETTER to the Right Honourable JOHN Baron
LYNDHURST, Lord High Chancellor of England, on
the ADMINISTRATION of JUSTICE in WALES.
the
JOHN FREDERICK Earl CAWDOR. Price 4s.
9. The LIFE BrATAINS of WILMOT WAR=WIdK, edited by his friend HENRY VERNON, in 1 vol.
post Bvo. price 95. boards.
" The Tales possess considerable merit, .and, indeed, are
better worthy the notice of the public than many works of
Haien of much greater pretensions.' 5We regard the
Work as a clever production, and augur favourably of the
future exertions of the writer."—Weekly Review, Sep-
tember O. _ .

"a The whole book, is an agreeable miscellany of tales,
vrhie.b will profitably beguile a weary hour, exciting happy
Vino and leaving no unplessing reininisce&ces behind."
---Morning Advertiser.
" A peculiar awl somewhat affecting tone of pathos runs
through same of them ; while a subdue) raillery, combined
with nu small insight, into human nature, is apparent, and
highly amusing in others."—Age.
" 'lbis is an entertaining collection of tales, pet together
after the manner of the Sketch Book."—Sunday Times,
Sept. 14. '
Reyier may be fosnd in almost all the principal pttbli-
• •
cutioal•
10. A LETTER to the OWNERS and OCCUPIERS
of SHEEP FARMS. By Earl STANHOPE. Price
ls. 6d.

11. ABSTRACTS of the •EVIDENCE taken before
the Select Committee of the House of Lords, appointed to
take into consideration the State of the BRITISH WOOL
TRADE, clamed under different heads. Price 2s. 6d.
it. An EPISTLE from ABELARD to ELOISE.
By THOMAS STEWART, Esq. Price le. teld.
Stich, if there he, who loves so long, so well—
Let him our 3ad,eur tender story tell..—Pope.

ATURg is a mysterious treasury. It pos-
-11 senses innumerable blessings fur human kind, and
produces an antidote for every disorder incident to the
human frame.--This treasury, with all its invaluable riches,
is the proper study of Medical Science ; and it requires the
most laborious research to discover and develope all its
various mysteries.
For twenty years has our successful experienoe been
directed to the, treatment of a certain class of diseases, and
we pledge ourselves to t e removal of Syphilis, from its in.
cipient symptoma.to the remotest stages, characterised by
every doubt and whatever malignancy. The intricate
and much-neglected diseases of Urethra have been carefully'
and studiously considered, and have else those delicate and
important sympathies which refer to the Female Sex. The
in6rmities of virility have been espeCially noticed, wb.etlicr
a. arising front the debilitating tyranny of a tropical status-
phefe—the natural bias of constitution—the imprudence of
gaity—or the more alarming results 4;:a prupeusity
practises " which shun the light ;" the Progress of Which
is marked by gradual ilereliuthin of the animal powers.
To all who are thus circumstanced, and more especially to
inch NU* aspirants for connubial pleasures, we earne:Aly
.1 recommend our Cuuunentariee, Ist, the "lEgis of Life,"
for the one Sex; or, 2d, " Hygeisna," eKclusively ad-
dressed to Females ; the perusal of which must prove hene-
. ficia to their mural happiness. These books may be had
lof Mears. Sherwood, Gibect awl Piper, Paternoster-row ;
and Chapple, 29, Pali-n-114. London; Sutherland, No. 9,
Calton-street, Edinburgh; Porter, 72, Oratiou.street,
Dahlia ; and by all'Boolmtellers.—(Price Os.)
-Remedies can be forwsrded.tnany par; of. the ;
Patients writing for the same, will please to enclose a Bank-
, note.—Attendemst at home for consultation as usual.
OOSS and Co., M.R.C. Surgeons, No. 11,
Bouvet ie-
street, Fleet-sircet, London.

LAW INTELLIGENCE.
COURT OF CHANCERY; Due. 17.
ROBING AND ANOTHER' v: i)EFONViIhi,II.:
.1

Mr. Rot Trip,, in the course of the day, made an ,
application for an injunction under the circumstances
of this case, which he represented as extremely
pressing, and as requiring ,the• immediate -interfe
rence of the Court to prevent an injury to the
plaintiffs ofa•serious nature. He stated from the
bill, that the. defendant, M. Defonvielle, a 'French-
man, had come some time ago to this country with
an invention for clarifying water• by means of passing
through a filtering composition; but not having.ino-:
ney enough to pay the fees on a patent, he was un•
able to obtain , one. In this situation he applied to
the plaintiff, Mr. G. Robins -(the auctioneer), who
furnished him with the necessary money for -that
purpose, and took from him an assignment of the
patent as a security. The same , reason which
had at first prevented him from obtaining the pa-
tent, prevented him •from making any benefic►al
use of it, and it was afterwards agreed that
Mr. Robins, the other plaintiff, Mr. Fisher, and
M. Defonvielle, should carry on the manufac-
ture and sale of the invented articles for their
• mutual benefit, the plaintiffs being to furnish
the funds necessary for so doing. In pursuance
of this agreement, which had not been reduced
into writing, a manufactory was established and
a house taken in the Strand, the whole expence
of which had been defrayed by the plaintiffs. The
affidavits in .support of the bill further stated, it had
been recently discovered by the plaintiffs, that the
defendant was making an improper use of the part-
nership name for his own private purposes; that be
had dawn or accepted a bill in the name of the firm,
which he had got discounted, and that he had sent
similar bills without the- knowledge of the plaintiffs
to Paris, where he endeavoured to get them dis-
counted through a French banker, who, suspecting
that something wus wrong, had refused to take them,
j and by this means intimation was. received by:the
plaintiffs of the defendant's designs. They then
employed an agent to meet him, and to ask whether
he had. any partnership bills to dispose of. The de-
fendant replied that he had, and offered to sell him
a 1,0001. bill on the partnership for 5001., and to
procure him similar bills to the amount of 3,000/.,
which he would sell to the agent for 1,500/. ; add-
ing, that if he could realize the latter s►un, he would
go to Paris, thus become a bankrupt, and then the
plaintiffs must be liable, and might be recovered
against for• the whole amount. The bill. prayed a
dissolution of the partnership on the grounds stated,
and that the defendant might in the mean time be
restrained from drawing or negotiating any bills in
the partnership name, or otherwise dealing with dr
pledging the
.property of the firm...
The LORD CHANCELLOR, upon this statement,
granted the 'injunction ex parte,it being competent
to the defendant to move dissolve it upon answer-
ing the plaintiff's affidavit.

VICE-CHANCELLOR'S COURT, Dec. 17.
TIONETON V. THE ATIORNEY.GBNFAAI. .
In this case exceptions to. the Mastees report,
similar to those mentioned yesterday, were argued on
behalf of another set of•claimants.
Mr. BORNE (with whom was Mr. SuorfruN)i in
support of the•exeeptions, argued that an entry in a
parish-register, which was thought to bar the claim
of hid clients, was erroneous.
The ATTOIINEYr.GENERAL (with OM! was Mr.
WRAP) contended that the parish-register was not•
to be disturbed by mere conjecture. ...
• 'Fite VICE-CHANCELLOR, if he had any doubt upon
the subject, would direct an issue. He had none,
he must therefore overrule the exceptions.

COURT OF KING'S BENCH, Dre. 17.
THE xINQ v. GEORGE REDAIVAY.

This was an indictment against an attorney of
Clement's inn, for wilful and corrupt perjury.
Mr. GuRNET (with whom was Mr. Goulburn)
stated the case for ,the prosecution. The; proseen-
tor, John Alexander M'Laren, having,.in_ October,
1826, been arrested at the suit of Reuben Martin,
the pugilist, for a sum of 501., which had been de.
posited in M'Laren's hands as one of the stakes on a
walking match, applied to the defendant, Mr. George
Redaway, an attorney, of Clement's-inn, to put in
bail above, and defend the action for him, The pro-
secutor had had no previous acquaintance with the
defendant, and was recommended to him by a per-
son' of the name of Hanbury, who was a client of
his. The defeodant undertook to put in bail to the
action, but required an advance from the prosecutor
of 2/. 55., which sum was paid to him ; but the pro-
secutor having afterward 3 some reason to be dissa-
tistied with the defendant's conduct, declined to al-
low him any longer to conduct his business, and
went to another attorney. Mr. Hanbury was also
dissatisfied With the defendant's conduct, and he
therefore resolved to take his business out of his
hands. For the purpose a Judge's order was ob-
tained for the delivery of the defendant's bill-of costs
on Mr. Hanbury, and under that order the defend-
ant made .out his bill ; but to the gi'eat surprise of
Mr. Hanbury. and also of the prosecutor,
the costs incurred in the action at the suit of Reuben
Martin, which the prosecutor had employed Reda.-
way to • defend, were charged, in this bill to Mr.
Hanbuty. The total amount of the bill was be•
tween 50/. and GO/. On taxation, it was reduced
to about 51., the Master having disalloWed the costs
in Martin's action agaidst the prosecutor, and some
other costs which. he did not conceive Mr. Hanbury
was liable to pay. An application was then made
to the Court of CommOrt Pleas on the.part of the
prosecutor, for. the purpose of compelling the ti-
fendant to make out his bill on him. A rule /145 i
was granted, and in the affidavit made by the de-
fendant and his clerk, Walter Tyler, the perjury i"
this case was assigned,. In' that affidavit the defen-
dant swore that at the first interview which he Pratt
with the prosecutor and, Mr. Haubury he stated
that he would not undertake the defence of the ac-
tion at the suit of Martin unless Hattburi was to
be considered his client, and would undertake to
be answerable for the loss iCeurred. lle swore
further, that .Hanbury expressly desired him to
defend thestetion at his (Httitbitry's)
own expense
and risk, stating that the money for which the
action was brought, belonged to him, arid that
the prosecutor was affected by the action merely
as a Nominal party. He also pcAtively
,sworethat Hanbury said to him, "'I employ you; I am
your paymaster, and will pay your cOsts.". Upon