The Sun.
London, England, 1845-05-08 00:00:00

the slave-trade, although the refusal of France to ratify
the treaty gave the power to the other three natins to
refuse adltering to it. He had every reason to believe
that no communication had been made to that efft.'et to
the other three Powers.
Lord PALMERSTON said that as to the second
uestion with regard to the powers of the Government
of
the United States, he presumed that there would be
no difficulty in obtaining diplomatic conamunicatien
rn
those remonstrances from the United States' Gove:
merit, and in having them laid before the House; and if
they were joint remonstrances, of course they would he
laid before the House; as they were represented would
joint in spirit, he thought that no inconvenience
arise from doing so.
WELSH MAIL.
Mr. HENRY F. BERKELEY wished to ask stood
tion of the Chancellor of the Exchequer. Be understo
remove
that it was the intention of the Government to
the mail which passed through South Wales from Bri;
tot, and to direct it in some other line, and as he vva Lot,4)`
opinion that it would have the effect of injuring Bris
he wished to know whether it was true?
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER oil!!
that m
stte of t case ws, Oat the it for Sou
Wales the
passaed throhuegh Bristoal, the effect of which wasto retard the letters for Sou* Wales for several hour!!
and as it was the desite of the inhabitants of Sciutow
Wales that their letters should be delivered as soonrer
possible, arrangements to that effect were in prog tut;
and would soon be finished. He wished to state, at .
-
same time, that Bristol would not suffer any inconvent
ence.

NAVY E.
Captain PECHELL wishedMto k now if the na
estimates were to be brought before the House the
l
evening ? Trull laid
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQ

that that was his wish.
POOR-LAW (SCOTLAND). ,
On the order of the day being read for mewle
th
second reading of the Poor-law Amendment (Scot od)
Bill,
e
The LORD ADVOCATE said, that as be was
d;
sirous to give some time for drawing up the report °a
rtheaisdrini
AT
gll,ohnerli,sila-k3e,dwtleiealt,.the house would take the see°
rle
CH TEL INTEREST (REAL PROPERTY)7 a
kis
Mr. SCOTT, ie moving the second reading 0. toe,
Bill, presented petitions from Dudley, Wolverhang re.
Birmingham, and Stirling, signed by 'awe he
siding in those localities. He said tpa' iiill
(hi not understand on what ground this re,
could be rejected. The petitions were signed by re'
he
spectable solicitors of long standing and practice, Itili oes
believed that there were many others in other 1) ere.
who were of opinion that it was a beneficial Inell'050"01.
nHle hoped they would allow the Bill to go ltit°„id be
ittee, and if they put any restrictions on it, it 11°Tioder
desirable that they should have them brought -
their consideration.
o 3.d oet
The SOLICITOR-GENERAL said that he lion'&
feel very much oppressed by the arguments f tile disposed
Gentleman in favour of the Bill, nor did he feel of
to deport from the resistance to the second retedilget
this Bill which he intimated that he should be diNich
to make. He never recollected having sanction
, that
a measure as that. He did not see the nece.se./ 0.00
the Houourable Member should preface his' mote
for the second reading of this Bill bY hod-
petitions, every one of them being in the s3alc is the
writing, and every one of them being expressed )
bee re,
samef language.—(Laughter.) If the Hon. Nier6i.cors
erred to the report of the Real Property measureCol°fflis-
he would find that they recommended no such to of
as that. The evils which resulted from such a, state
things were obvious. The Hon. Member Asko!, ',es
benefit was it, that the law should remain as " ors
and he said it was for the sole benefit of the e, 01
and that the present Bill would correct this evl' were
its operation would render valid titles that now
to being questioned. Now, he (the S°, hoe
General) could not foresee that this Bill wo,le 0 he
any such effect. He could not approve of it ,oe3 not
saw that the Real Property Commissioners "(goo)
given any intimation of their approval of lt•-- easuret
He took no particular interest in the r° ieod
but at the same time he would not like to tbet
his sanction to it, as he apprehende
_,,e
much inconvenience might follow. Ile would sulltl°;eo
case, a man dying worth 10,0001. intestate, a °. Yroigbt
might have been the mortgagor of the cod_
ale of
become administrator, and what then would hecB, thee
those who were the heirs of that deceased ? . to ale
whole, he should say, that he could not, in PI: thaw
public, give his sanction to this Bill; and vioa do eV
fore, move that it be read a second time tillis of
months. en rots,„.,,e •
Mr. GRANGER contended that the a,,,,,f10ugh-2_,
the Solicitor-General were contradictory. ,',,,--at show
to be done in that House on this subject, but Wm-cotattdi;
receive the approval of the Real Properti
se should
sioners ? He really did think that the House the/
require some stronger argument than that h
were eon-
rejected this measure. The man evils wiile,
tinually springing up by reason of defects tl erefoe,
d, 01 .3 ed
dered this measure absolutely necessary;
A he cons' erh
he trusted the House a euld pass it, an. „f, her who
the country aas much indebted to the 1100• ''''" 133
had introduced it.—(Hear, hear.) DI!
Mr. ROEBUCK said he conceived this n'e,'ot epP'e
an extremely suspicious appearance. for it diall',,,cl ta'
to the future at all f therefore the law, as it s'''''-vent
future time, would remain exactly as it was now; ~, the
there was the fact of the four petitions presented all ill
Hon. Member who introduced the measure, be"wtiords'
the same hand-writing, and in exactly the sato°, 'd be
On these grounds he would oppose the Bill, reio., ill
should find some specific object to be attalneutu, tood',„
-tles, re
rejected
its present state, it did not alter the law as it 11°-.4 131''
Mr. HUME could not see the harm of letting Ileoeld
go to Committee, for it was a very short one, en'
be easily disposed (if. ni 0 tat
Mr. T. B. C. SMITH would oppose the Die-Lt, 0
ground that it would have a most mischievous ene-te in3es
a retrospective measure. In Ireland it Was
clerk
est"
the vii elf
the practice of au attorney to set up his own clerk bt
representative of a deceased party, in order th,a„ 00
make him administrate with the view to giv°4'esre .tt"
(the attorney) the power of enforcing an)" e'-„ it P7'
might have on deceased's property, and svr'er sol•
away, to the prejudice of all the other eredit°ers-14#'
this Bill would have the effect of geeing the °rat thltD/
in this country. He did feel very stronglY tba' 00 it.
was bad in principle, and, therefore, hew ould opPle, we
Mr. Sergeant MURPHY would wish to .Irne for the
the Government prepared to say that a proels'e-01 015
bon4 fide sale of an assignment was one which sillo 00_0,
be made ? He would say let the Bill be reaullootrii
time, and in the meantime the solicitors of sit Opioi°'
would have an opportunity of expressing their of it hoel
upon it.—(Hear, hear.) And let the operation _ dee
postponed for three or four months, or
that opportunity. Id be
Mr. CHRISTIE suggested that the Bill shot colter
lowed to stand over, and abide the result of L°l"
a the
ham's Bill. 'O.- t.
Sir J. GRAHAM said he should vote agl.lo, wheal
second reading of the Bill, without any besittsetinsice 13 r
ever, more especially as there was a comp the °the,'
regarding probate laws coming down from OO4OP
House of Parliament, under the high ansrices
Cottenham.
Mr. SCOTT replied. red'
The House then divided, when there aPPea 2
For the second reading .................. -sO7
Against it .............................. - 3
in order te e
Majority ........................... int°
FIELD GARDENS BILL:,
~„ go
Mr. COWPER then moved that the o°".i-. i
Committee p: o forma on the Field Gardens 13'h,, , 00011.0
Mr. ROEBUCK moved that the Bill be rea'nf therhe
time that day six months. The prineiPleii it conllr 0
were wholly untenable, and the only n'tq :0-os. Lhs
improved would be to erase its chief prov's- to ""ere
main object of the Bill was to supplY wagees;:ons were
sort of auxiliary to the poor-law. Poor l)--eting -.„1(1;
of
supper
, and
to be allowed to have land as a means
istence, whereas it was cle it that the labogrere:."Tbeele
well-regulated country ought to depend upon loilt-ii to the
were about to bring down the people of thiSeri f irelrof
condition of the pauperised potatoe.ted Pe°Perhls kille-i• h
He wished to remove the poor man from w. in l'''heel
mock humanity. Let them look to any Pears sad .heel
these allotments bee existed for tvventy 9_,s"„otagee.tee'
would find a settlement of pauper • All; aorl °ltl-00,
taken of the labourer who had a little g
farmer, and less wages given to him, °l' the 1155
forsooth, that he hada pig and a garden. A
Mr. B. ESCOTT seconded the amendn3e°-,,a Dee,l.,
Sir JAMES GRAHAM hoped the Liotoelt-
anteivlsi'
Gentleman would not press the motion 1100,
He (Sir James Graham) had stated to the .rote, ibis°i
Learned Gentleman, bath in public and in Pries iti a
he had great objection to several of the clauses oil it
meat, he (Sir James Graham)
Bill. If the Hon. Gentleman should press '.'„lf tee,' a,
1 e Bill Pro intr,
his duty to vote forthe committal of
t 1 h IA alslll
He believed would pie .., forme,
that the Hon. Gentleman weo htt-the
duced the Bill had done so with the lostVh-o-
mozives. The acquisitfon of small plots d land ce of hap"
labourer with his dwelling, was a great sour r, ereere
piness. and comfort to him, This Bill, h wevegill were
etlot 0
not give him that. The provisions of the be
compulsory, and the land which woula a be icl
woe' vioe
to the labourer under this Bill •• Dill ..fet,
enable the fi•ld wardens to
a distance from his dwelling. Ths, esbow oil
say tO the boa, lila
"You have half an acre of very productive werhle.
you pay a small rent for it, you can thereforCh the 0
11
me for lower wages." Thus far he agreed",v,l,l,r nob Dor
Member for Bath, and the Hon. Membe ' 0;ost 3 Coin.
only done h;s duty in entering his pro go Lip
rawly
tion of this measure. Should this Bill go Or
mittee, he (Sir James Graham) should 01° wat
watch the details of this measure. s to drevh3t
Mr. ROEBUCK said, that his object w,°,- After
should
tention to the mischievous effects of this Dill. ho
had fallen from the Right Hon. G Dill
d the
not press his amendment. an
The amendment was then withdrawn,
passed through Committee pro forma' Co the - he
MEDICAL 1.31 LL•
rove it t-
Sir JAMES GRAHAM then rose to oto in
oto C eta' 1
0(11101- C 1110.'
mittal of this Bill. He wished the lions i Z
Bill p'o :forma, for the purpose of intr 1. ele die
alterations which he was about to sullcal adjust dies
•ble to ,bo -
entletaan, -
always had an earnest desire, if possl gree' e 1 $
land an , ..deon
of the general practitioners of Ertof buh,br-
differences which unhappily existed betweell a Iv" e.:
and the governing body of the Collegeoo andit 'oder
The College of Surgeons was in posses'les, coder
Tree stroll and
which gave them extensive privileg Lille/Ice. ite
gwehniecrhaltphreayetietndoonyeresd
ngurmeeartiepaollwyerwaenrod
very
to " evell
powerful, and if they were empowered
Council, if' a
_,,d
..i. " • lies '''' f
presentative body in the shape of o.° th los 03 o
short time the elected body would reflect had smith ha
opinions of the constituPnt body. III; raise acre 0
the general practitioners in the terras 0 .I)._ they
_,,tis
felt was due to them. In rural districF
~. ow
most important class, but in the metropolis the