The Sun.
London, England, 1859-03-14 00:00:00

NEW AND IMPORTANT DISCOVERY IN THE
SCIENCE OF MEDICINE.

Patent Office Seal of Great Britain. Diplome d'Ecole de
Pharmae,le Pharmacies de Paris. Imperial College of Me-
dicine, Vienna.

The Patentee attends daily at No. 19, Berners-street, Ox-
ford-street, London, between the hours of 11 and 2, and from
5 till 8, where the medicines may be had.
TRIESEMAR Nos. 1,2, and 3, prepared in the form of a
lozenge, devoid of taste or smell, and can be carried in the
waistcoat pocket. Sold in tin cases, divided into separate
doses, as administered by Valpeau, Lallemand, Roux, Ricord,
&c , adapted for both sexes.
TRIESEMAR No. 1 is a Remedy for RELAXA-
TION, SPERMATORRHtEA, and all the distressing
consequences arising from early abuse, indiscriminate excesses,
or too long residence in hot climates. It has restored bodily
and sexual strength and vigour to thousands of debilitated
individuals who are now in the enjoyment of health and the
Functions of Manhood: and whatever may be the cause for
DISQUALIFICATIONS for MARRIAGt they are effectu-
ally subdued by this Wonderful Discovery
TRIESEMAR NO. H.
effectually, in the short space of three days, completely and
entirely eradicates all traces of Gonorrhoea, both in its mild
and aggravated forms, Gleets, Strictures, Irritation of the
Bladder, Non-retention of Urine, Pains of the Loins and
Kidneys, and those disorders which so often ruin the health
of a vast portion of the population.
TRIESEMAR NO. 111.
is the great Continental Remedy for Syphilis and 'Secon-
dary Symptoms :C it constitutes a certain cure for Scurvy,
ScrOfula, and all utaneous Eruptions, removing all impu-
rities from the vital stream, so as altogether to eradicate
the virus of disease, and expel it through the medium of the
repos of the skin and urine, and is a remedy for that class
of disorders which unfortunately the English Physician
treats with Mercury, to the destruction of the patient's con-
stitution, and which all the sarsaparilla in the world cannot
restore.
nexerntrae,rtso-
strPerietee,
which saves lls., and in £5 cases,
011xsie,rsde!sttrdeieret,ctLfornomdenth(
any part of the United Kingdom ; or four cases in one for
335., by post 3s. 2d. extra),
the Medicinespa" le
to Medicus, and a statement of the case, will be
saving of £1 125., upon receipt of Post-office Order, b
sent by return of post.
To be had also of Barclay
and Sons, 95, Farring,don-street ;
11003
Daniel Church, 78, Gracechurch-street ; Bartlett p 4. ,
King William-street (four doors from London-bridge);
Manchester.
'Hannay, Oxford-street ; Ingham, druggist, 46, Market-street,

HUMAN FRAILTY ; a Medical Work, 'price is.
post free, illustrated with 100 engTaving,s, containing the
opinions of Valpeau, Lallemand, Roux, Ricord, &c. It ,rives
instructions for the perfect restoration of those who are pre-
vented by impediments from entering into the married state,
also showing the dreadful results from early abuse, 'gonorrhoea
and syphilis, and the benefits arising* from the chemical tests
and the examination of the spermatoza by the newly-con-
structed microscope, with powerful lenses.—Sent direct from
the Establishment, No. 19, Berners-street, Oxford-street.
Sold by J. Allen, 20, Warwick-lane, Paternoster-row, and
by all agents far the sale of ‘•Triesemar."

OINOP OLION TAVERN AND HOTEL
FOR GENTLEMEN,
Nes. 1, and 2, Brownlow-street, High-Holborn.
The Best Served Dinner in London for ls. 6d.
A Succession of Joints, dm, from One till Seven o'Clock.
Henekeys, Abbott, and Co.'s Wines and Spirits.
Private and Smoking Rooms.

MR. ELLICE, M.P., ON THE REFORM

BILL.

The Right Hon. Edward Ellice has addressed
the following letter to his constituents at Coventry:
" Arlington-street, March 9.

"My dear Mr. Marston,:--I hope you and my
other friends who propose to call the meeting on
the bill now before Parliament for the reform of
the representation will excuse me for declining to
attend it. The crisis is one of no ordinary diffi-
culty. Incidents arise from day to day which may
change one's opinion as to the course to be pursued
on it, and I intend to remain unfettered by any
personal declarations and engagements which may
prevent my voting, either on the whole bill or on
any details of it, in such a manner as I may think
most conducive to the interests of my constituents
and the general interests of the country. I will at
the same time pay the most respectful deference
and attention to any wishes or resolutions the meet-
ing may express or come to on the subject.
" And I desire, according to my old habits, to
maintain no reserve with my constituents with
respect to the principles or details of the proposed
measure, as they are presented to the public, and in
so far as I can form an opinion upon them.
" There can be no doubt that the bill in its pre-
sent shape is a very bad one. I shall feel it im-
possible to support the disfranchisement of the
county voters having freeholds in towns—the gene-
ral alteration of borough boundaries for obvious
purposes ; and the revival of a system of non-
resident voting—l have no faith in voting papers.
If other extensions of the franchise are somewhat ca-
pricious, I have no great dislike to them. I approve
cordially, so far as it goes, the transference of 15
seats from small boroughs to large constituencies in
England, and, above all, the great object of securing
the £lO voters in the counties.

" But there is one reason especially why I with-
hold my absolute condemnation of the bill. It
secures their franchises—threatened. by former
projects of this description—to our freemen,
and provides a special registration for them—
to a certain extent an admission, and therefore con-
firmation, of the principles on which their franchise
is founded. Much has been said of the rights of
the working classes to share in the representation.
I know of no better principle on which they can be
extended. From my experience of the manner in
which this franchise has been exercised at Coventry,
I can testify to the perfect independence and absence
of corruption which has characterised all parties,
whether supporting or in opposition, voting by
virtue of it at our elections, more especially since
the Reform and Municipal Reform Bills.
" What, then, are the objections beyond those I
have stated to the Ministerial Bill ? The limited
disfranchisement of small boroughs, and the main-
tenance of the borough franchise at £lO. On these
points my opinions have always been frankly stated
to you, and I see no reason for changing them. I
should have preferred a larger disfranchisement ;
and when the time has arrived, as it must arrive,
for lowering the borough franchise, I should infi-
nitely prefer giving the franchise to all _resident
householders paying rates and taxes, than to either
a £5 or £6 rental, proposed in Lord J. Russell's last
two bills. We shall then have a settlement
on principles which may be permanent. Accord-
ding to my judgment a rental and rating
franchise cannot be effected from the different
principles of rating in different towns. But
I frankly admit my doubt whether the time has yet
arrived for the establishment of a household suff-
rage. More progress in general education, and
larger experience of the working of the municipal
franchise, will amply compensate for the delay that
may be occasioned by anything new, if we can ob-
tain in this emergency, without the alloy of the ob-
jectionable clauses, the advantages of the present
bill.

" There are, then, other considerations, which
must be weighed in deciding upon this case. These
concessions are offered by the Conservative party,
and can be carried with our assistance. No refor-
mer will deny that they will be so much gained. If
the absolute refusal of the bill, even with any
amendments, is insisted upon, the Government may
either dissolve -- which I think improbable—
or it may change hands. In the former case, we
shall have the country thrown into confusion, and
the impediments which now obstruct the revival
and prosperity of trade aggravated and increased.
In the case of a change of Government we shall
have the same proposals of reform repeated as were
made in 1852 and 1854, including, probably, the
disfranchisement of our freemen, on some abstract
principle of uniformity, without the least chance of
the authors of the bill being able to carry them ;
and an obstruction—while the discussion and agita-
tion it will excite is going on—of all useful mea-
sures of social amelioration and improvement. I
say the least chance of their being able to carry
them, from some knowledge and experience of the
state of parties. The party which offers the present
bill, and the members whose personal interests or
the interests of whose constituents would be affected
by the disfranchisements in either of the former
bills, are a majority of the house. We have not yet
arrived at that state of opinion out of doors which
enabled us to override personal interests and objec-
tions in 1832.

" My present impression, therefore, although the
case may change from new incidents before the se-
cond reading. would be to vote for any resolution, in
amendment of that reading, condemnatory of the
provisions I object to in the bill ; thus giving the
Government the option of proceeding with the other
clauses !if they please. If no such resolution is
proposed, but a question arises for the simple rejec-
tion of the bill, I shall be inclined to vote for the
second reading, with the intention of expunging
the objectionable provisions. If they were not
expunged, then to vote against the third reading.
" I have no objection to your communicating this
letter to your friends. They may differ with me,
but they will admit I act on no personal grounds,
and that, as has been my constant practice, I deal
frankly and unreservedly with them. I am wholly
opposed to the bill of my good friend Mr. Bright.
He appears to me to found his whole proceeding on
a fallacy. He insists that the representation should
be distributed according to property and population,
and thereupon proposes to give the whole power of
representation to population. I think all interests
should be fairly represented—the various classes of
our society—and that the working classes, above
all others, should have their full share of the repre-
sentation. All this can neither be arranged in one
day, nor in one bill, but any step taken in the right
direction should be secure, and any such step leads
necessarily, as it ought to lead, with caution, pru-
dence, and experience, to a further one to the same
end. The difference between this country and
America is that in America the field was prepared
for the seed—all was equal; it was a new country,
in which new institutions were implanted without
disturbing old ones. In this country there are
hard old roots in the ground, which will not be
easily rooted out--.certainly not without a more

painful struggle than any we have yet seen or read
of, and we must therefore adapt our cultivation to
the circumstances of the soil. We have done much;
we must continue to do more. Human progress
will go on, and all we can pray for is, that it may
proceed under the guidance of good and enlightened
men, so as to improve, and not destroy, the institu-
tions of this best, if still imperfect, state of all
human societies. So long as I have the honour to
represent you I will do the best to promote progress
on this principle; and if this is not satisfactory to
my friends, I am always ready to make way for
those whom they may think more competent to
fulfil the trust they have so long confided to me.—
Ever, dear Mr. Marston, yours most faithfully,
" EDWARD ELLICE.
" W. H. Marston, Esq."

IRELAND.

DUBLIN, SATURDAY MORNING.

THE NEAPOLITAN EXILES.

The Cork Reporter of yesterday has the follow-
ing remarks in reference to the victims of Neapoli-
tan despotism who have madelreland their temporary
resting-place, after 10 years of cruel persecution in
their own land :

" Yesterday the Mayor, accompanied by. Messrs.
Jennings and Nagle, waited on these illustrious
sufferers, to carry to them the present amount of
our fellow-towsmen's tribute, £lOO. The following
gentlemen from among them were chosen to assist
according to their need their associates :—The Duke
of Caballino, the Baron Poerio, Signor Spavento,
Professor of Philosophy. The warmest feelings of
kindness were expressed towards our fellow -
townsmen, and one of the gentlemen having asked
Poerio for his autograph, he wrote as follows :
" Having been kindly requested for my auto-
graph by an honoured gentleman, I cannot better
comply with this desire than by expressing to the
worthy Mayor of Cork and the citizens of this
flourishing city our Anse of the most deep gratitude,
in my name and those of my dearest companions in
exile.

BARONE CARLO POERIO.' "
The Examiner, published last night, says

" Three of the principal refugees left Cork on
Thursday evening for Dublin by the train leaving
Cork at 10 10. It is their intention to proceed
from Dublin to London. The thee consist of the
young mate (Raffaelle Settembrini), who induced
the party to come hither, his father, and another of
the most important exiles. It is the intention of the
remainder to proceed to London after these on
Tuesday next, and these three have gone before to
make arrangements for their arrival. The father
of the mate is to settle in London, while the others
are to proceed to Sardinia, where they will remain
under the auspices of the Sardinian Government.
The Nimrod, one of the Cork Steamship Company's
vessels, will convey the residue of this Neapolitan
party to London on the day mentioned as fixed on
for their departure, Tuesday next."