The Sun.
London, England, 1857-01-15 00:00:00

THE DOUBLE MURDER AT TrALWORTH

EXTRAORDINARY AND HIGHLY SUS.
PICIOUS PARTICULARS.
Yesterday, after the ordinary business of the Lambeth
Police-court was disposed of, Mrs, Martha Bacon, who
stands charged on the coroner's warrant with the wilful
murder of her two children, Edwin Fuller and Sarah
Ann Bae )le, was again brought before Mr. Elliott for
further examination.
The melancholy case has, since the last examination,
from many causes that have transpired, assumed a very
different character; so different, indeed, that it now be-
comes a matter of considerable doubt whether hers (the
prisonee's) is the hand by which the unfortunate children
have been deprived of their existence.
It will be recollected, from the testimony of Dr.
Bushel, the medical gentleman who had been examined
at this court, and at the inquest also, that the wounds
on the throats of the poor children, and *Lich must have
instantly deprived them of existence, was the result of
one cut, executed by so powerful and muscular an effort
that the heads were nearly severed from the body, white
the wounds on the prisoner's own throat were mare
scratches, and penetrating only skin deep.
Inspector Young said, since the last examination, he
had received information that a robbery had been com-
mitted in the house, as well as the murder, and as he
was making inquiries relative to the alleged robbery, he
should, under those circumstances, ask for a further
remand.
Mr. Elliott—Very well; let the. prisoner stand re-
manded to a future day.
The prisoner was then removed from the court, and
her husband, who was present during the examination,
followed her to the gaoler's room.
As before stated, circumstances have transpired in
connecti m with this unfortunate tragedy of a startling
1 and highly suspicious character ; and on Tuesday even-
ing Inspector Young, who has been ably and actively
engaged in their investigation, attended before Mr.
Elliott with Bacon, the father of the murdered children,
and the husband of the poor woman just removed from
the bar, when the inspector, addres,ing the magistrate,
said—Your worship having heard fur the first time, on
the morning of the inquest of the children, that a
robbery was committed, I made it my business to see
Mr. Bacon the next day, and he then informed me that,
between the time of leaving home on the Monday
1 morning, the 29th, and his return on the Wednesday
1 morning, the 31st, his house had been robbed of a 51.
' bank note, two sovereigns, a Geneva watch, belonging
to his wife, and a suit of clothes. The note and sove-
reigns he said were in a small box placed on a chest of
drawers, the watch on the drawers, and the suit of
clothes hung outside on the lobby of the upstairs
room. The 51. note he describes as one of four which
be had received from the London and Westminster
Bank for a cheque sent to him by Mr. Atter, his
solicitor, at Stamford, and the money, the watch,
and the clothes he said he saw safe on leaving
his home at an early hour on Monday morning.
The watch he said he had purchased from his brother,
who lived in Charles-street, Northampton-square, and
used to be worn by his wife, and its number was 32,798.
It was a silver Geneva watch. The suit of clothes he
described as consisting of a great coat, with pockets at
the sides, a frock coat, and trousers. Having received
these particulars, I first proceeded to inquire about the
notes, and having procured the numbers I found that
three of them had been paid into the Bank of England
on the 20th and 21st of November. A fourth note Mr.
Bacon passed, on December 24, at a shop No. 41,
Bishopsgate-street ; but that has not been paid into the
bank yet, and therefore I cannot say whether it is one of
the four mentioned; but Mr. Bacon distinctly told me
that the note stolen was one of those he bad received
floin the London and Westminster Bank, in change for
a 301. cheque.
Mr. Elliott—Then the whole of the four notes had
been passed away, and three of them reached the Bank
of England before the alleged robbery 7
Mr. Young—Yes, your worship ; but I am not cer-
tain whether the note passed in Bishopsgate-street is
l one of the four he received at the London and West-
minster Bank. I told him (Bacon) I had traced out the
four notes, and asked him if the one he bad passed in
Bishopsgate-street was one of those he received at the
London and Westminster, when he hesitated a good
had
deal,to id oannd d
particularona length
note
otle a
from,ssaid he
k es
asked
and
md
he
variedo the
particularlyr
considerablynotesw since
here
h e
gh
oe came
tn h
thisi s
statements, as he has frequently done through our in-
quiry, and could not tell me.
Mr. Elliott—Have you been able to trace the clothes /
Mr. Young— I have not, your worship. Mr. Bacon
has varied a good deal even in his description, and says
he started from London before 7 o'clock on a cold winter's
rinvoranignrgeaftocroaßt i
eignatthee, whoituheonbleyhiancdahnvimas. j icket on, leav-
iMr. Elliott—Did he say how he left his wife on leaving
home on the Monday morning I
Mr. Young—Yes, sir. He said ho left her in bed quite
comfortable ; that he kissed her before leaving, and that
she had tied up his finger before he left. I asked him what
was the-matter with his finger, and he said he had cut it
while cutting a stick. I asked him to show it to rue, and
he exhibited his left hand, when I found a straight cut
between the first and second joints of the first finger half
an inch in length and an eighth of an inch in depth.
Mr. Elliott—A straight and deep cut I
Mr. Young—Yes, a deep cut ; and even about this
Bacon prevaricated, for he afterwards told me the cut
had been occasioned by the knife slipping while cart,
ii.g the dinner on Sunday ; but he could not account
for his not having it dressed before his starting on
the Monday morning, when his wife did it for him.
He further said that he had seen the money safe on
the Monday morning when he went to the box for the
purpose of getting a piece of cotton to dress his finger
with. In conclusion, Mr. Young said that almost
every time he bad asked Bacon for fresh information,
and adverted to that which he had told him before, his
statements were different, contradictory, and most unsa.
tisfactory.
Bacon, in reply to what had been stated by the Inspec-
tor, said that his mind had been so perplexed, and he bad
been so examined and cross-examined by the Inspector
that, though with every disposition to tell the truth, and
not mislead, he might have said things that were not
exactly correct. He loved his wife and children, he said,
too well, and had done everything in his power to make
them happy, and he was quite sure, he said, that his wife
loved her children too much to have done it. lie felt
cousin,hq
eui
went
quite
es sure
tr
ode
down
wte
tnw 1 was 1
ir done ononopete btn
oye
dtsaotkhmeee
chdaorodeoyrowhf
he saw
arh:
va had
all
uodianintilin. come in at
companion and a protector tohgabidoerar
tfe octrehietvhadloi
the door and not at the window, for he himself, while in
ub bed dill\ .
tiahor
en 0 enstn
street.
hi
Elliott—Theo
eg
eehrt et. ,
whßee:anfrot dr
Before
n.somebodytoouleaving
a 8
uspo pni townuaestwe
somewhat
otee u
rambling
aoa
uccd
ihkbgi,
m murderedent
a b o
about
ty
tshoeuu emboondeyycso coming; n
belonging
g—tlo rheiaillywi(fleo,,
was about to offer a sarinelwaardgaifnor.
dtehcelailissciitnc, watch
only to
etell
then, but
btruth
hteo
(t.
ffih eceorfficer.
awnilshth:n:
1 Mr. Elliott told him he should not trouble him for
pursuit of his inquiries, and Bacon withdrew.
Yesterday there was ranch iu the conduct of Bacon to
should still go on in
, night.o r
a ?n d
:weesadtnaal losti
sdowts walk
, hheteherei hisesae.