The Sun.
London, England, 1859-05-20 00:00:00

LAW INTELLIGENCE—May 19.

FULL COURT FOR DIVORCE AND MATRIMO-
NIAL CAUSES.

Cases to be heard before the full Court for Divorce and
Matrimonial Causes. The Court will sit at Westminister
to-day and on the2lst 23d2 2itir and 25th days of May,
1859 :—Levermore v. Levermore and Lewis (respondent
dead)—Astrope v. Astrope (for further hearing)—Rateliff
v. Ratcliff and Anderson—Mawdsley v. Mawdsley (post-
poned by consent)—Hawkvard v. Hawkyard and Foster—
Peckover v. Peckover and Jolly—Dixon v. Dixon—Joseph
v. Joseph and Wenzel (respondent dead)—Braharn v. Bra-
ham and Miller—Oliver v. Oliver—Hurst v. Hurst and
Parker—Brunell v. Brunell—Hall v. Hall and Webb—
Laws v. Laws—Popplewell v. Popplewell—Smith v. Smith
and Vickers—Hearne v. Hearne—Jones v. Jones—Turner
v. Turner and Gill—Withers v. Withers and Furley—
Pulley v. Pulley and Samuel—Spencer v. Spencer and
Vick—Dyson v. Dyson—Hooke v. Hooke—Bengough v.
Bengough and Kelly—King v. King and Brown—Braines
v. Braines and Wood—Hamer v. Hamer and Carter—Gwyn
v. Gwyn—Stead v. Stead—Walker v. Walker and Water-
son—Brittain v. Brittain and Camp (Sr further hearing)—
Cunnington v. Cunnington and Noble—Tolfrey v. Tolfrey
and Krause—Bevan v. Bevan—Rylance v. Rylance—Hor-
ton v. Horton—Yearsley v. Yearsloy—Bennett v. Bennett—
Walton v.Walton and Hibell--Palmerv.Palmer—Howard v.
Howard—Hunter v. Hunter—Wilks v. Wilys—Lutwyche
Lutwyche and Cox—Evans v. Evans (for further hear-
ing)—Mure v. Muro and Chichester--Hall v. Hall and
Walker—Potts v. Potts—Cramp (falsely called Cremer) v-;
Cremer—Gibson v. Gibson—Tomkin v. Tomkin and Drege
—Seaby v. Seaby and Bayerstock—Goggs v. Goggs—
Devereux v. Devereux (for further hearing)—Groves v.
Groves and Thompson- (for further hearing)—Davies v.
Davies (for further hearing)—Dax v. Dax—Hunter v.
Hunter and Vernon—Stoakes v. Stoakes and B ough—
Sadler v. Sadler and Kell—D'Oyly v. D'Oyly and Baldie
(for -further hearing)—Croker v. Croker and Mavius—
Leigh v. Leigh—Stanmore v. Stanmore and Waterhouse—
Palmer v. Palmer—Styrin v. Styrin and Hiley—Nelson
Nelson and Grantham—Holmes v. Hohnes—Hawker v.
Hawker, and Seale—Cook v. Cook and Quayle—Kretzsch-
mar v. Kretzschmar and Rinecker (for further hearing)—
Harris v. Harris and Meadus—Dyer v. Dyer—Hancock
v. Hancock and Bell—Sheward v. Sheward. and Ward
—Du Terreaux v. Du Terreaux Pellew v. Pellew
and Berkeley—Shore v. Shore—Huggett v. Huggett
—Egg v. Egg and Cooper—Russell v Russell—Chan-
dler v. Chandler—Tollemache v. Tollemache (jury)—
Cousins v. Cousins—Hall (falsely called Castleden) v.
Castleden—Curwood v. Curwood and Catterrnole—Wales
v. Wales and West—Allen v. Allen and Shirley and Rutter
—Charter v. Charter and Berwick—Tongue v. Tongue—
Polkinghorn. v. Polkinghorn and Wadge—M`Kechnie v.
Maechuie and Menzies—Haswell v. Haswell and Sander-
son—Millson y. Millson—Boyd v. Boyd and Collin—
Phillips v. Phillips and Norman—Marsden v. Marsden—
Lawrance v. Lawrance--Manton v. Manton—Field v. Field
—Leach v. Leach—Wrightson v. Wrightson and Whitby
—Howe v. Howe and Fry (jury)—Alexander v. Alexander
and Amos—Brown v. Brown and Wild—Baldwin v. Bald-
win,
and Kelly—Hervey v. Hervey and the Right Hon.
Lord Ribblesdale (jury)—Worner v. Werner and Mayo
(jury)—Rogers v. Rogers and Paul (jury)—Macdonald v.
Macdonald—Soden v. Soden and Schmidt—Rowley v. Row-
ley—Vaughan v. Vaughan and Gillyeat—Weatherhead v.
Weatherhead—Hughes v. Hughes—Griffiths v. Griffiths
—Thomas v. Thomas—Wilton v. Wilton and Chamberlain.
—Evans v. Evans—Scantlebury v. Scantlebury and Cross
—Cook v. Cook and Lucy—Pensom v. Pensom and Clark,
otherwise Cross—Goffrie v. Goffiie and Moore—Pritchard v.
Pritchard—Coles v. Coles—lVlatthOws v. Matthews—Neale
v. Neale and Holland—Biller v. Biller and Green (jury)—
Winter v. Winter and Normanville--Smith v. Smith—
Yalden v. Yalden and Freeman—Evans v. Evans and
Edwards and Watkins—Faulkner v. Faulkner and Moore—
Parker v. Parker and M'Leoyd (jury)—Midgley (falsely
called Wood) v. Wood—Lloyd v. Lloyd and Chichester—
Rowe v. Rowe and Marsh—Page v. Page and Barnes—
Baco,nv. Bacon and Bacon (jury)—Baggott v. Baggott and
Thompson (jury)—Bannister v. Bannister and Davis—
Stainthorp v. Stainthorp—Fuller v. Fuller and Dyer—
Gapp v. Gapp—Crommelin v. Crommelin—Buckingham v.
Buckingham—Allen v. Allen and D'Arcy (jury)—Daniels
v. Daniels—Nash v. Nash and Jones (jury)—Boynton v.
Boynton (jury)—Pearnian v. Pearman and Burgess (jury)
—Cock v. Cock and Hatfield—Lupton v. Lupton—Jones
v. Jones—Simonin (falsely called Malac) v. Malac—Dennis
v. Dennis and Johnson--Wilton v. Wilton—Bill v. Bill
and Shepherd—Davis v. Davis—Wells v. Wells and
Rushby—Coulson v. Coulson and Barnsdale—Bell v. Bell
and the Most Hon. the Marquis of Anglesey.
The above causes, except those which are marked for
trial on specified days, will be called on in their turn.