The Sun.
London, England, 1861-11-21 00:00:00

1851 and 1653, the years in which the adultery was
41Ieged to have been committed, gave similar evi-
dence as to the visits of Della Rocca and the officers
at Rome, at Albano, and at Frascati. There was
at one time a dispute between the French officers,
which was said to have arisen from jealousy. Two
witnesses, Cesare Valentino, an advocate of Rome,
and. Michael Angelo Coetani, Duke of Sermoneta,
had been examined to prove that it was contrary to
the usages of society at Rome for a lady to receive a
gentleman in her bedroom while she was at her
morning toilette. All objection was taken to the
admissibility of evidence of this nature, and it was
not read.
The witnesses examined before the Commissioner
on behalf of the respondent were lAnazio Silvostry,
a sculptor, and Constantino Somaini, a painter, of
Rome. Silvestry said that Della Rocca was a friend
of his, and a painter. He had visited at Mrs.
Bailey's, and there was generally an agreeable and
merry society there of an evening, but he never
noticed any impropriety in her conduct towards
Della Rocca, or any one else. lie added, that on
occasions of festivity it was usual for ladies to re-
ceive visits in their bedrooms at 10 or 11 o'clock,
but it was not usual generally, and he and the other
visitors were not in the habit of visiting Mrs. Bailey
in her bedroom. The other witness, Somaini, also
said it was not the habit of properly educated per-
sons to receive visits !n their bedrooms. He never
went to Mrs. Bailey's bedroom when she was dress-
ing, and he never noticed any impropriety in the
conduct of Della Rocca and Mrs. Bailey towards
each other.

When the depositions had been read,
Mr. Sergeant Shee asked his lordship to adjourn
the case for further evidence in support of the peti-
tion upon the affidavit of the petitioner's attorney
that he expected to be able to procure the evidence
of a material witness.

His Lordship thought that the affidavit did not
show sufficient ground for an adjournment, which
might cause great hardship to the respondent, as
she might be prepared with evidence in support of
her recriminatory charge.
Dr. Phillimore said he did not intend to call wit-
nesses in support of the recriminatory charge.
His Lordship said that might alter his view of the
case. He had supposed that the lady might have
witnesses in attendance. He would take till to-
morrow morning to consider what course he should
pursue.
The trial was accordingly adjourned until to-
morrow (this) morning.

IN TIIE GOODS OF BETTY FARADY, DECEASED.
An application was last week made by Dr. Phil-
limore, Q.C. for probate of the will of Betty Faraday
whose husband had deserted her in 1832, and who
had obtained a protection order a few weeks before
her death. This order had not been registered
within 10 days after it had been obtained, in the
manner prescribed by the 21st section of the Divorce
Act, and the question was whether this omission
invalidated the order so as to deprive the deceased
of the right it would otherwise have given her to
dispose of her property.
His Lordship this morning said he bad considered
the question, and he was of opinion that the grant
might be made.

POLICE IN7ELLIGENCE, Nov. 20.

MARYLEBONE. Thomas Puzey, George
Reeves, and Anne Collett, were placed at the bar
before Alr. Yardley on remand, charged with rob-
bery, and also with the attempted murder of Mrs.
Sarah Greeen, a widow lady residing at 5, Fulham-
place, Paddington.
Mr. Venn, solicitor, of 3, New-inn, Strand, ap-
peared for the male prisoners.
Inspector Braddick said he had only one addi-
tional witness to be examined.
Miss Louisa Duffy was then called, and said,—l
live with my mother at 27Victoria-place,Westbourne-
grove (the address given by Reeves). lam the
daughter of the householder. Reeves lodges in the
house. I know both of the other prisoners, whom
I have seen at our house. I have seen all of them
there together at one time. I remember the 24th
of October, the time of the attempted murder and
robbery. I then saw all the three prisoners at the
house. They came in at different times. I mean
the two men came in together and went out together.
They left our house about 8 o'clock in the evening,
after having been there, I should think, about an
hour. The woman was there the same night. She
came to the house about 6. She went out again, as
near as I can think, about half-past 8. She returned
to the house again between 9 and 10. The two men
went out before she did, about 8 o'clock. When
the woman went out and returned again I am not
aware if the two men returned with her. If they
returned that night it must have been late. -Reeves
had one room in the house. When the male pri-
soner Puzey and the woman came to the house they
all went to Reeves's room. I have seen all three
together. They were all three in the room on the
night in question. I cannot say positively whether
previously to this I have seen them all three to-
gether. ;Both the man Puzey and the man
Collett have been to our house before this. I have
seen Puzey in Reeves's room. On the evening of
this robbery I cannot, from my own knowledge, say
how Reeves was dressed. Ido not know whether
the other man had a hat or cap on, but I rather

think he had. -
Inspector Steer, D division, produced a kind of
rifle corps cap, with a peak, which was found at
Puzey's lodgings.
Witness would not swear to this as the cap.
Puzey had then the same whiskers as he has
now. Reeves had a hat on and a moustache.
I saw Reeves on the following morning. He left
about 10, along with Puzey. I saw them go out.
I saw Reeves again three or four days after. He
was only at his lodgings once or twice after, so
that I cannot tell how long he wore moustaches
after that. I saw Reeves again on the Saturday.
The day of the robbery was Thursday. I cannot
say when he called at our place, or if he had a
moustache on. I did not see them come home on
the night of the 24th of October, but I believe they
did, as I saw them go out at 10 the next morning.
I only infer from the fact of seeing them both go
go out together. I saw the woman again on the
following Saturday evening. She asked for Reeves,
and I said he was out, and she went away.
Mr. Yardley—Mr. Venn, have you any questions
to put to the witness ?
Mr. Vann—Only one, sir. What time do you say
it was when Reeves left the house, and was Puzey
with him.
Witness—l believe it was about 8, and Puzey was
with him.
Inspector Steer said—l entered the house after
the robbery, and picked up a life preserver, a mask,
and a chisel.
Mr. Yardley—We will take that statement upon
the next occasion.
Inspector Braddick said that the evidence ad-
duced was all he had at present, with the exception
of Mr. Steer's.
Mr. Yardley said the evidence was most impor-
tant, and that now he should remand the case till
Wednesday next.

WESTMINSTER.—Mr. G. Bourehucalt, of No.
1, Lower-grove, Brompton, appeared to prefer com-
plaints against Marcella Dalton and William Quin,
two servants in his establishment, for gross mis-
con duct.
Complainant said that Dalton had been for some
time nurse in his family and up to the present com-
plaint had conducted herself very well. She came
home late on Tuesday night in a state of intoxica-
tion, and then wanted to go upstairs to take charge
of a child 11 months old. Ile endeavoured to re-
strain and appease her, when she set up a series of
shrieks which disturbed and alarmed the whole
neighbourhood.
A policeman proved that he found her outside the
house creating a great disturbance and incessantly
ringing her master's bell: She was very drunk and
refused to go away, although every opportunity was
afforded her of so doing.
Defendant said she was very sorry for what she
had done.
Mr. Paynter pointed out to her that her mis-
conduct had cost her her place, and, fur-
ther, that she might have much difficulty
in getting another, as her master could not in jus-
tice give her a character with which any other
person Would willingly take her. In consideration
of these circumstances he only inflicted the penalty
of 55., or seven days' imprisonment.
The evidence against the man servant proved
that, coming home drunk at one o'clock in the
morning, he shouted, yelled, and made a great dis-
turbance. When turned out by his master he
knocked violently at the door.
Mr. Paynter repeated the remarks he had made
in the former case, and imposed the same penalty.

On Sunday morning, a destructive five broke out
in the goods store of the Dublin and Glasgow Steam Packet
Company, North Wall, Dublin. A large quantity of the
goods stored in the promises was either destroyed or
damaged—the loss being estimated at between £9,000 and
£lO,OOO.
[ADVERTISEMENT.]—Holloway's Pills. --Distemp?red
Blood—Many causes contribute during winter to poison
the blood • fogs, sudden changes of temperature, and
diminished out-door exercise are always allaying the circu-
lation. Holloway's Pills are proved to be the best known
purifiers and correctors; they thoroughly cleanse the blood
and regulate its course and distribution. For coughs, colds,
influenza, bronchitis, oppression of the chest, palpitation,
gout, and rheumatism, these excellent Pills have earned for
themselves a world-wide reputation; their virtues are ex_
tolled from polo to pole, and their general preservative
powers universally acknowledged. Holloway's Pills may
safely be taken by both sexes at any age. They will de-
monstrate themselves to be the surest antagonists to all
dioardered actiqa other irreguluitieg c the systeza,
)