The Sun.
London, England, 1857-11-17 00:00:00

LONDON, TUESDAY EVENING, NOVEMBER 17, 1857.

METROPOLITAN BOARD OF FVO.RKS.

A meeting of this Board was held yesterday in
he Court of Common Pleas, Guildhall. The Pre-
iident, J. Thwaites, Esq., took the chair at twelve
o'clock.

MAIN DRAINAGE OF THE METROPOLIS.
Mr. D'IFEANGER, pursuant to notice, moved :
" That before taking any further steps on the en-
qineering points of the main drainage, the Board,
or a Committee, do seek au interview with the First
Lord of the Treasury and the Chancellor of the
Exchequer, for the purpose of ascertaining whether
Government are prepared to assist the Board in
reference to its financial position, and to what ex-
tent ; and that the members of Parliament repre-
,enting metropolitan constituencies be requested to
Attend the interview." In doing so, he shortly
urged that, without the aid of Government, it
would be impossible for the Board to do anything.
There must be indirect, as well as direct taxation,
in order to obtain sufficient funds for properly
draining the metropolis.
Mr. lows seconded the motion.
Mr. BRISTOW moved as an amendment that the
question he now put.
Mr. SAVAGE seconded the motion.
The amendment was carried without discussion,
he original motion was therefore lost.
The PRESIDENT then presented his report of the
result of the late conference with her Majesty's
Chief Commissioner of Works, which Mr. Woolrych
read as follows :

" To the Metropolitan Board of Works.
" I have to report that, pursuant to the resolution of
be Board on the 30th Oct., I, accompanied by the en-
gineer and clerk of tile Board, attended the First Com-
uissioner of her Majesty s Works and Public Buildings,
the parpoee of conferring with him on the. E abject
the main intercepting 'drainage of theinetropOlis.
" I entered generally into the several objections en-
tertained by the Board to the scheme proposed by the
referees appointed by the First Commissioner. I stated
that, in my opinion, some of the differences between the
Board and the referees were rather subjects for the con -
,ideration of the First Commissioner and myself, re-
quiring to be adjusted before the engineering points
should be discussed by the engineers. That these ques-
tions were those arising upon the portions of the report
of the referees which applied to the preposal of open
sewers, the enlarged area, and the oost of the extension
of the ontfall beyond B 5
" Having referred to the objections which it appeared
to me existed in point of law, and on other grounds, to
the recommendations of the referees in relation to those
questions, I proceeded to call the attention of the First
Commissioner to the statement which he made to a de-
putation from this Board on the 20th Nov. last, to the
effect that if the Board would adept the point of outfall
suggested by Capt. Borstal, at B*, they would fulfil all
tt.eir obligations under the Metropolis Local Manage.
ruent Act so far as concerned the outfall, and asked him
f, having regard to that statement, he could inform me,
in case the Board should decide upon extending the out-
ran to Sea Reach, whether Government would adopt
measures for contributing the additional cost consequent
upon the extension. The First Commissioner said that, as
regarded the question of the open sewage, he agreed
with the Board that it was essential that the sewage of
the metropolis should be conveyed away in covered
channels, and consequently that the open sewers were
inadmissible. That with respect to the proposed en-
largement of the area, he did not desire to impose upon
the Board more than was now required by law, and only
asked that they would carry out the object contemplated
at the passing of the Metropolis Local Management Act,
namely, that they would free the Thames of all impuri-
ties lowing into it within the limits of the metropolis.
" With respect to the cost of theextension, that before
the Government could pledge itself to make any contri-
bution to the cost of extended works, it must apply for
the sanction of Parliament to any such arrangement,
and, in, his opinion, Parliament would refuse to make
any contribution whatever.
"I then asked the First Commissioner whether, in
the event of the Government and Parliament refusing to
make any direct contribution to the cost of the works
necessary for extending the outfall to Sea Reach, the
Government would be prepared to aid the Board in
ootaining the requisite funds for carrying out the main
drainage, by borrowing the money and lending it to the
Board at the same rate of interest, on the security of the
rates, or by some other mode that might be suggested.
" The First Commissioner said that the question
whether the Government would ba willing to guarantee
the money borrowed by the Board for the purpose of the
main drainage, was one which lie was not in a situation
to answer; that it was a matter peculiarly for the con-
sideration of the Chancellor of the Exchequer, but that
if the Board should think proper to make an application
to that gentleman directed to that object, he should be
happy to attend any appointment at which such an
application might be brought forward.
"The First Commissioner further stated, that he
would strongly urge the Board to convey the sewage to
Sea R,,aeb ; that by so doing an efficient work would be
carried out, and that the total additional cost would be
teat by a rate not exceeding five farthings in the pound ;
and be suggested that two Members of the Board should
be associated with their engineer, that they should meet
the referees and discuss the engineering points iuvolved
in the questions at issue, with the view of agreeing
upon a plan which it might be advisable to carry out ;
and he added, that he should be happy to assist by
every means in his power to bring the matter to a satis-
factor completion.
" I stated that I would report to the board the re-
sult of the conference.
(Signed) " J. THWAITES."
Mr. A. R. BRISTOW moved a resolution to the
effect that the board, having considered the whole
matter, reiterates its conviction that to extend the
point of outfall to Sea Reach at the cost of the
metropolitan ratepayers, would be unjust to those
ratepayers, and in direct contravention of the prin-
ciple of the Metropolis Local Management Act.
In doing so, he apologised to Mr. D'lffanger for
having displaced his motion ; but he conscienti-
.ously believed that this was not the proper time to
carry out whattit proposed. He had read the re-
port of the late conference with mingled feelings of
pain and pleasure. He felt pain at the course
which the Government had adopted towards V°
metropolitan ratepayers, as ho considered both un-
fair and oppressive ; but he felt pride and pleasure
at the able and dignified manner in which the
board had been represented by their president, and
he begged, as a member of the board, to tender
him his sincere thanks and congratulations upon
the occasion. (Hear.) He would now consider
what the present position of this great controversy
was. Mr. Carpmael said, on a former occasion,
that as plan B* had been rejected, the board was
in fact without a plan. He disagreed with that
proposition. The board had its plan, the Govern-
ment referees had. theirs, and as to the question
of covered sewers, it must be satisfactory to the
board to know that the Government agreed with
them and not with the referees. The latter recom-
mended open sewers ; the board at once said
No ; Sir B. Hall said No, and the public at large
echoed the repudiation of the recommendation.
The main and substantial question now to be con-
sidered is who is to pay the excess of expense in plac-
ing the outfall to Sea Reach. They all agreed as to
the benefit and advantage attending that point of
outfall. He would, however, press upon the board
the necessity of standing firm to the principles
which it had already., enunciated, and which were
takingaStts
hahgi rierede Brße
tad.
hot Haeaowrtp
ndaai lwdtyl
eenttrhhcshiaiseutmi
nao
increased
aidses
involved in his resolution. He agreed with
h
s
mailygrepaotinrotinonwalhuicnhdehre-
g Ne nhe
oe
or Chiefdfooutusa
doubt
ata
nt
hi.doeCommissioner
wliberali
fo
tl
ja withsgkiev ae
ybb w.
thenepowerst t a
for them ; but were they to ask for more oppression
ea rwouldatciliased better
withter deeptha t an
for their constituents than they laboureel under
already ? He would remind the Board that its
proceeding,
hear.) would b e
anxiety by
every poor man within the metropolitan area.
othe
should abdicate its functions than altogether that
it should be contributing to do that which was un-
just.
Mr. CAREW-4.8L seconded the resolution.
Mr. Deputy HARRISON—The suggestion
of
making the metropolitan rate-payers pay the excess
of expenditure involved in carrying the outfall be-
yond the point indicated by B was unfair, and
unwarranted by the Act. Ho hoped the Board
would remember that they were spending the
ratepayers, money, and if they exceeded the
powers given by the Act, they would not be acting
honestly, and their precepts would be repudiated
as illegal. (Hear, hear.)
Mr. H. L. TAYLOR—The main question was,
who was to pay the increased expense ? If the
Board would stand well with the public, they ought
to throw the excess on the Government. The Chief
Commissioner now said that he had never directly
or indirectly, said that he would meet that excess.
On reference to the instructions he had given to the
referees, he distinctly states that any extra cost
would not have to be borne by the ratepayers. The
principle of the B* was the right one and ought to
bo adhered to. The Chief Commissioner had
virtually pledged the Government to meet the
extra expense caused by placing the outfall at Sea
Reach S. end if he had any principle, ought to feel
himself bound by that pledge. (Hear.)
Most of the members said a few words in sup-
port of the motion, which was ultimately carried
by a majority of 28 to 3, in a board consisting of
31 members.
Mr, BitasioW theta moved that the metropolitan

members of Parliament, and the members of coun-
ties and boroughs, should be invited to meet the
Board in order to discuss the matter.
The motion was seconded, but negatived.
A long and desultory conversation ensued in
the course of which Mr. Leslie stigmatised the re-
port of the referees as a tissue of abominable trash
and nonsense which it was an insult to common
sense to waste time upon. Ultimately the further
consideration of the matter was referred to Monday
next, in order to enable members to consider the
observations of the referees, in reply to the obser-
vations of the Metropolitan Board of Works on the
report of the referees.
The members, in the course of their remarks,
warmly eulogised the temper, firmness, and ability
with which the President had represented the
Board in the late conference.

THE GAS MOVEMENT IN MARYLEBONE.

The vestry of St. Marylebone met on Saturday,
in the Court-house, Maryleboue-lane, for the dis-
posal of general business, Mr. Churchwarden Soden
presiding. After the disposal of some routine busi-
ness, of no public importance, the important ques-
tion touching the amalgamation of gas companies,
and the threatened monopoly in the supply of that
commodity, was brought on by the vestry proceed-
ing to consider tenders for era parish-lighting after
Christmas next. The usual notice requesting ap-
plications for contracts had been issued, but Mr.
Greenwell, the vestry clerk, announced that there
had been only one tender sent io, and that wasfrom
the Chartered Gas Company, offering to supply the
parish lamps at the rate of 3/. 10s. each lamp per
annum, -with an illuminating power equal to eight
sperm candles ; 4/. frinn ifluminating power equal
to ten candles ; and 4/. 7s. 6d. for an illuminating
powerequal to twelve candles. The Equitable Com-
pany, at present supplying the parish with gas, de-
clined to accept the contract after Christmas; and
the London and Westein Company also declined
to accept contracts, urging that they had been badly
treated by the vestry of that parish on previous oc-
casions, when they were refused to ba allowed to lay
down pipes in the parish, so the vestry were left
entirely at the mercy of the amalgamation. They
must either accept the tender of the Chartered
Company, or go without gas.
Mr. GREENWELL informed the vestry that, ac-
cording to act of Parliament, the supply should be
at an illuminating power of twelve candles, but the
charge proposed by the Chartered Company was
1/. 7s. 6d. more than the charge made by the Equi-
table Company, in their present contract.
Mr. BRIDGMLN contended that this increased
charge by the Chartered Company was only just,
in consequence of the treatment of that company by
the vestry, nine years ago. The company then
offered to supply a good and cheap gas at a reason-
able price, but the vestry would not accept their
terms, but adopted a system of monopoly. (Hear,
and dissent.)
Mr. BELTON also condemned the conduct of the
vestry, and urged that the parish had only one
alternative now, and that was to have their own
works, and supply their own gas. (Hear.)
Dr. BA.CHILOFFNER said that the communica

tionfromthe Chartered Company appeared wholly
unintelligible, as they spoke of three powers of gas,
that of eight, ten, and twelve sperm candle power.
He considered inquiryshou Id be made in the matter
before auy further proceedings were adopted.
(Hear, hear.)
Mr. HonoEs maid be should support any such pro-
position as that for the parish, like Manchester, to
make their own gas. In the meantime, he moved
that the Chartered Company should be requested
to give a more detailed explanation of the tender.
Mr. CARR seconded the motion.
Mr. GRANGE asked what was to be done if the
Chartered Company would not supply them at less
than 4/. 7s. 6d.—could they go elsewhere
The CHAIRMAN replied that he believed not, for
the Chan ered Company's was the only tender.
Mr. GRANGER added that, under these circum-
stances, they had got themselves into a nice mess.
(Hear, and laughter.)
Some further discussion ensued, in which Mr.

Todd, Mr. Jacob Bell, Mr. Chichester, Mr. Traver-
ner, and others took part, the motion was carried
nein. con., and the vestrymen adjourned, after the
disposal of some further routine business of no
general public importance.

Last evening a public meeting of the ratepayers
and gas-consumers of Marylebone was held, pur-
suant t. a requisition addressed to the Ratepayers'
Association of No. 6, or Portman Ward, at the
Westmoreland Arms, George street, Portman-
square, "to take into consideration the present
combination of gas companies, and to devise the
best means to counteract the injurious effects that
may arise to the private consumers and parish
generally."
Mr. GEORGE SALMON was, at nine o'clock, called
to the chair. He observed that they had met to
consider a subject which as of great importance,
not only to the ratepayers and gas-consumers of
Marylebone, but to the whole metropolis. (Hear,
hear.) Circumstances had transpired with regard
to a recent combination amongst the gas companies
of the metropolis, which created an apprehension,
especially amongst the gas consumers, that they
would be the sufferers by this coalition of the gas
companies. (Bear, hear.) It was feared that
through this combination of the gas companies the
()consumers would suffor, either byan inferior quality
of their gas, or that there would be an increase of
price. (Hear, hear.) They all knew that compe-
Vision tended to the public good, and, cia the con-
trary, that monopoly tended to the public harm.
(HearThattheir
gashad been the case with the gas companies.
, hear.) Ho (the chairman) was old enough
to remember when the gas companies charged for
300chaorgr
ed fur4oOpetrhcaetn
article. He
H thane couldciught
re-
member have been.
member when the charge was 13s. 6d. per thousand
cubic feet. A great noise was made, and it was re-
duced to 9s. per thousand feet. A further noise
was made, and they got it down to the present price
of 4s. 6d. per thousand. The question was, how
long would it remain at that price, as the companies
had so divided the metropolis as to give them a
perfect monopoly. (Hear, hear.) No two com-
panies were permitted by the new arrangement to
light the same district, and therefore there was no
doubt it was intended that the gas consumers
should be the victims of this combination. (Hear,
hear.) It was a most important question, and he
had no doubt that the consumers would deal with
it as it ought to be dealt with.
Mr. BELTON moved the first resolution, to the
effect " That, in consequence of the combination of
the gas companies of this parish and the western
and north-western districts of the metropolis, it is
expedient that energetic measures be taken to coun-
teract the injurious effects to the private consumers
and parish generally, which we anticipate will
arise from such combination. He observed that
the ostensible ground of this districting by the gas
wascaopmpepaarnitehsat
th ea i rdeeesoi rneo
give anyadvautage to the consumers ; it was merely
economy
onyecinaonmyis:a,
ybaetxtietnddieddntoet
to increase their own dividends. As a proof of this,
he need only refer to what had recently taken place
in that parish. The Equitable Company, in con-
sequence of this arrangement between the gas com-
panies, were about to give up the lighting of a dis-
trict of companies had been applied to, they had
refused to light, and they were now left to the
mercy of the Chartered Company charged 31. per
annum, demanded 47 percent. more than the charge
of that company, or 1/. 7s. 6d. per light. This
showed that the parochial authorities and the gas
consumers should be watchful of their own
interests. (Hear.) The contract of the Imperial
Company expired next year, and if the authorities
intended to take any step to erect their own gas-
works, or to defend themselves from monopoly, now
would be the time to do so. He even understood
that so determined were the Imperial Company to
have a monopoly, that they were about to destroy
private labour by taking even the manufacture of
gas fittings under themselves. He thought there
could be no doubt but that if the parties were to
erect their own gas-works that the consumer and
the public would be much benefited. He held in his
hand a report drawn up 25 years ago by a gas-engi-
neer of eminence, Mr. Barlow, who stated that gas.
works and appliances for lighting Marylebone could
be constructed for 60,0001. He (Mr. Belton) had
put it down at 100,0901., which, at 5 per cent.,
would be 5,0001. per annum. It might, by a re-
demption fund of 10,0001. per annum over twenty
years, enable them to repay the principal ; and even
for the public lights alone nearly enough would be
raised to pay that sum. It had been said gas could
be contracted for at ls. 9d. per thousand, and if
even the parochial authorities charged 3s. 6d. per
thousand to the consumers, then they would have
a profit of ls. 9d. per thousand feet. (Hear.) Mr.
Belton concluded by moving the resolution.
Mr. COLE (a member of the vestry) seconded the
resolution.
Mr. BEAUMONT (of Clapham) urged the propriety
Of extending the resolution to bring in the whole

metropolis, as the people of South London were
equally alive to this important question.
The motion was carried unanimously.
Mr. F. HALLAM moved the second resolution :
" That a deputation from this meeting be ap•
pointed to wait on the vestry, to take the best
means for the establishment of parochial gas-works,
to be enabled to supply the public lights and esta-
blishments of the parish, and the private consumers
thereof." He detested combinations, and upon
that ground alone he thought the gas consumers
were justified in this movement ; at the same time,
he thought they had no desire to set themselves in
opposition to any particular company.
Mr. PENFOLD seconded this resolution, and com-
plained that the authorities of Marylebone had not
when they had the opportunity, given the parish
the advantage of gas competition, by admitting the
Western and other gas companies. He hoped that,
now this coalition had taken place between the gis
companies, the local authorities and gas consumers
would coalesce also, and, if necessary, apply to the
Legislature for assistance.
Mr. HODGES entered into an explanation of the
circumstances under which competition had been
prevented in Marylebone, and observed, that when
even they did get the loc Al authorities to take up
the case of the private consumers the companies
turned round upon them and said, leave us to deal
as we please with our own customers. (Hear,
hear.) There could be no doubt bet that compe-
tition had proved a failure, so far as the metropolis
was concerned, and, therefore, he for one would
not advocate competition by companies. The time
had arrived when the local aui horiti• s of the me-
tropolis and the ratepayers should follow the ex-
ample of Manchester, in the comtruction of their
own gas works and in supplying their own gas. He
was told that the municipal authorities of Man-
chester supplied gas at 4s. per thousand f.et, and
had a profit of 20,0001. per annum—(A Voice-
37,0001.)—which they applied to public improve-
ments. (Hear, hear.) If Manchester could do
this, why should not Marylebone and other large
metropolitan districts do the same ? This he be-
lieved to be the only course now to be adopted to
rid the parish of Marylebone, and the metropolis
generally, from the grinding monopoly of these
gas companies. (Applause.) If the other
parishes would join Marylebone in this move-
ment, there would be but little doubt of suc-
cess in Parliament if it was found necessary to go
there, although there was no amount of opposition
and no ameunt of money spent in corruption which
the gas companies would not exercise t o d efeat them.
Mr. WRIGHT, of Pimlico, said the consumers of
that district were very dissatisfied with their supply
of gas, and would cordially join in this movemene
The resolution was carried 11,CM. con., and a de-
putation having been appointed to wait upon the
Marylebone Vestry, thanks to the chairman termi-
nated the proceedings.

CONSECRATION OF TIII SCITY CEME-

TERY AT ILFORD.

Yesterday the ceremony of consecrating the new
City of London Cemetery, at Ilford, was performed
by the Bishop of London, in the presence of the
Lord Mayor, as head of the City Sewers Commis-
sion, the Aldermen, the Burial Board, Mr.
Haywood, the engineer, Mr. Daw, the chief
clerk, and a large number of persons who had
been admitted to the grounds by tickets.
After the ceremony had been gorse through the
bishop made a most impressive address tot be
audience, and the proceedings terminated.
The cemetery has been formed under the direo
tion of the Commissioners of Sewers of the City of
London, who are constituted the Burial Board of
the City by the Metropolitan Burials Act. It is
s tuated at Little Ilford, in Essex, a distaece of six
miles from the City boundary at Aldgaie. The
site was formerly a portion of the Earl of Morning-
ton's Wanstead property. The ground upon which
the cemetery is formed rises with gentle slopes
from its easkrn and southere extremities towards
its north ai rth-eastern bounds ies to a level
of about 30 feet above high water line on the river
Boding. The soil over the entire area ,s of fine
hright gravel, varying in depth from 10 to 18 feet,
and it has been perfectly drained to a considerable
depth. The total area enclosed nB9 acres, of
which 49 are to be consecrated, and 21 reserved for
the use of Dissenters ; the rema'ning l9tl are at
present unappropriated. The consecrated area is
separated from the unconsecrated area by a road
and iron posts 2 feet high, placed at distances of
about 100 feet apart.
The posts are just sufficient to show the divi-
sional line and no more, and are in no respect cal-
culated to excite upleasant feelings in either Dis-
senters or Churchmen. The principal entrance is
upon the western side • it is formed by a Lirge
sweep of iron railings, divided at intervals by stone
buttresses. in the centre is a large archway for
the entry of carriages, and upon either side a
smaller archway for visitors entering on foot. lin-
enaliately upon the interior is the office and super-
intendent's house upon one side, and the por er's
lodge upon the other. The whole of these build-
ings are of stone, of Gothic architecture, and alto-
gether very handsome in their character. The
superintendent's house and office have been so
arranged that from his windows he can command a
view over almost the entire area of the cemetery.
Directly upon entering the gates are the Episco-
pal and Dissenting chapels. They are 700 feet
apart from each other, but both are approached in
direct lines from the entrance. The Episcopal
chapel stands in a commanding situation in the
centre of the ground. It is of pointed gothic,
built of stone, and about 60 feet in length by 25
feet in breadth. The Disseni ing chapel is in the
same style and material, and is an octagon, about
34 feet across on the inside. Both buildings have
open wood roofs, covered externally with blue tiles,
and are very handsome structures.
In one portion of tho ground, in a deep hollow,
are catacombs capable of holding 800 coffins. Over
them is a terrace, from which the whole cemetery
can he seen with advantage. Some of the cells of
these catacombs have already been disposed of, and
now that the consecration has taken place, will be
immediately occupied. The ground adjoining the
catacombs has been laid out with grass slopes from
the upper levels.
In all the arrangements for the burials the
greatest care is taken. Bodies are usually (except-
ing in the case of private graves) laid but two in a
grave, a deep stratum of earth being left between
each, and a larger surface area has been allotted
than at any cemetery round London. The poorest
graves are decently turfed over and neatly kept.
The whole, without distinction, have the privilege
of service in the chapel. The record books are of a
very perfect character. The plan books are three
huge volumes, containing many hundreds of sheets
in which every grave is drawn to scale, so that the
precise situation in which any person has been
buried may be identified a century hence.
There is scarcely a point connected with
sepulture which has not been investigated by the
board, and the reports presented to them by
their officers are documents containing a large
amount of valuable practical information upon the
*abject.
The works of drawing and enclosing were com-
menced in June, 1854. With the exception of the
catacombs, the works wese completed by Christmas,
1855. The whole has been carried out under the
dbe Imo! Mr.Th Wm.
total Heywood,has
b et
ehne aa rbucohi -t
76,0001. ; but there is surplus land which the cow-
mission have for sale, which, when disposed of, will
Theecost
materially reduce this sum. Taking into account the
ornamental and substautial character of the build-
LucPter to superintendence
inas, the completeness of the drainage, the provision
of catacombs, &e., it is probable that, for its area,
formed round London.
it is by far the cheapest cemetery that has been yet

[Anuarissmsprr.]—We have read with much pleasure Du
Barry's report on the cure of diseases without
lemedicine
nsti by Du
Barry's Food, of Indigestion(Dyspopsia), Flatuncy, Copa-
tion, Nervous, Bilious, and Liver Complaints, Cough, Asthma,
Consumption, and Debility. The following are a few extracts
which appear to merit the attention of many : —Cure No.
—Miss Elizabeth Jacobs, of Nazing Vicarage, Waltham cross
Herta: a cure of extreme nervousness, indigestion, gather.
ings, low spirits, and nervous fancies. Cure No. 48,314.
Miss Elizabeth Yeoman, Gateacre, near Liverpool : a cure of
10 years' dyspepsia and all the horrors of nervous irritability.
Cure 52,612. —Rosstrevor, County of Down, Ireland , 9th Dec. ,
1854.—The Dowager Countess of Castlestuart feels induced,
in the interest of suffering humanity, to state that Du Barry's
excellent Revalenta Arabica Food has cured her, after
all medicines had failed, of indigestion, bile, great
' lervousness and irritability of many years' standing. This
Food deserves the confidence of all sufferers, and may be co-
sidered a real blessing. Inquiries will be cheerfully answered.
Supported by testimonials from the celebrated Professors of
Chemistry, Dr. Andrew lire; Dr. Shorland ; Dr. Harvey ;
Dr. Campbell ; Dr. Gattiker ; Dr. Wurzer ; Dr. Ingram ;
Lord Stuart de Decies ; the Dowager Countess of Castle-
stuart; Major-Gen. Thomas King, and many other respectable
persons, whose health has been restored by it, after all other
means of cure had failed,. Suitably packed with full in.
structions. In canisters, 11b, 2s. 9d. ; 21b, 4s. 6d. ;
hßmegaerenth:tlrBese4t:aLgoaninadotnsuf.
Alfred
droLTArrper CAUTION against
la.miin.tsatttihnge
lie ; 121 b, 225. The 121 b canisters are sent carriage II en,
on receipt of Post-Office order.—Barry Du Barry, & Co.,
fearful dangers of spurious imitations :—The Vice-Chancel-
lor , Sir William Page Wood, granted an Injunction en the
710;
". DU Darryl BevalentaArabick Food."