The Sun.
London, England, 1859-04-30 00:00:00

Wit.

G ~~ t

y-vGL
C ~

„ :
to: 4, 0 ~.. Wit • 314_ 4
,1,..,_
• N 44,,-----0 :,- /, , .
..__ ~ -04, ~,,
e...r A . &.'
' ' 7.••• qg ---- ------- •-•.. , ,
er
.gip one ~ e• , , \l!"fiN . i.. , illellri c- .6-1 t : --.. :0,:l%•t ,k,
-- ......” . ~,....
-,.,e porPg -,.'-e.;., , cs t , 40 0 ,
it.) A :er_,
„,, ' '''.'
,Iv '....',
~ i--, - zrir „.„-- ,
, ..,. ,•
.„... , e I 2.
~,,,,,..,,1,._.,
~, _ is:,
_
7 '.:
\ '11.5, ,-, ti No 't4„- • --tAr • ,
,- t" - •, 44/1r , - ~.. "'..,''s
ei5L,..„.
1,,7, ~.....„----- .
..,..,.,' , _____ ....44(
:,.' , -_,, - --,,, , ms.- 46:4 kl - et T c 461 AS ,014 -' 4' 'I,
. 4,. • ~,,el,
.. , r
' N.,
~,.., ~-", y e .... '-:_5()00‘, id&‘.. " ' -DIE I V' ..,,, ,
,t f Itirte4.44 , .."-,:.,,,,... ,e, bnoTT. !!‘,, V 4 "may ''
N"*,.4.",x1r,' ' ...,..
"--- __..---- ~..., • . . ,
. .

£

~ Gz

• \ 'DER
with t\ unanimous respect of rho /foam; et ,)1%
- -
admission of their honesty and virtue. • (Applatis44l
hon. gentleman proceeded to comment otisoth&lett.gth*.:l.,,,.
his objections to the bill, the principal of.
disfranchisement of the 40s. freeholdersirbsVitit,iit-eqtt.'";-,r4.11
with votes in the counties, and tho noun-4*Weritio thit:r
b :rough franchise beta* £lO. In :-come
fancy franchises proposed in the bill, he demob:fit =
pudding before rne.at. (Laughter.) They were tllalaitifok:;in -
'of the dish without the joint—the cabbage and the oarruircal :
without the round of beef. (Renewed laughter.) He axasii :Ina%
for the round of beef. (Cheers and laughter.) HrtoitArlYii .114
a large reduction of the franchise—for the free adtteirattliEof.a..s..) T
working men. - When he was laSt there he told theid Iths:losse:
on the whole he was of opinion that them unaosell-tiKihisciflw r.:
might be made the Parliamentary franchise. luv tstisuid3rlA
that opinion nsw. If a man occupies a hotistilikaktee
years in the city—if for two years and .he'l-
rates and all the taxes that come against him—he Mos the
security of an abiding interest in the place which he in-
habits; and his solvency, the regular payment of his rates,
is a security for his thrift and his general character. gov,
continued the hon. gentleman, .I should not deal franklY
with you if I blinked the question of the ballot.. I cannot
give you any pledge that I shall support the ballot. My
opinions at present are hostile to it. t think 'that for any
great act of public virtue: something like personal sacrifice is
necessary. Truth and honesty and Plain dealing are the
characteristics of my countrymen. I do not believe that
when it comes to a pinch any man in his own person will
fail to give effect to his honest opinions in the face of day.
Truth and honesty, again I say, are the characteristics of
the people of this country ; and unhappy indeed will be the
day for England when those who 'are .ntrustod with the
franchise shall not exercise it manfully', and openly. (Cheers.)
I think a large extension of the franchise is the best security
against bribery and intimidation. Again,, I think• that
bribery and intimidation are more exercised in small bo.
roughs than in large ones. That is a reason for the dis-
franchisement of a considerable number of small boroughs,
and for that disfranchisement lam quite prepared. In
conclusion, the hon. gentleman, adverting to some remarks
' that had been made relative to a change in his opinions,
said that, frail in his judgment, but honest in his purpose,
he had changed many opinions. To say that aman dealing
with state affairs is not to change his opinions under any cir-
cumstances might be a recommendation for a lunatic asylum
—it was not a recommendation for any deliberative assembly
in the world. (Loud cheers.) He confidently looked for-
ward to the result of the poll as offering him again the
honour of being one of their representatives.
Mr. W. N. nODOSON and Mr. LAWSON then addressed
the meeting.
The MAYOR then demanded a show of hands for the re-
spective candidates. There was a considerable majority in
favour of Sir James Graham and Mr. Lawson.. Mr. Head
thendemanded a poll ou behalf of Mr. Hodgson, after which
the proceedings closed, having lasted nearly four hours.

PRICE 4v• STAMPED, SD.

geucy and dangkr of the occasion may compel us to under-
take. It is in unity among ourselves—it is in loyalty to the
Throne—it is in attachment to our institutions—it is in
that, just, and temperate, and constitutional progress which
cements society together, which from time to time brings
within the framework of the constitution new classes,
whose ir_telisence :and education entitle them to , ad-
mission, but who have heretofore been excluded—it is by
healing, wholesome measure,;of this kind that the safety of
a great people in appalling circumstances can beat be
securel. (Cheers.)- I- spent a large part of last year in
considering the question of manning the navy. lam no
alarmist with regard to this country. I believe that if this
country were put. to the proof, she is equal to cope with the
world in arms. (Loud cheers.) Ido not think that united.
Europe could assail her if she took proper precautions to
protect herself. (Cheers.) We hear of a despotic monarch
commanding half a million of troops ; I believe that in a
short time, and without much cost, we could have half a
million of troops, actuated by cordial attachment, on the
coasts of this country, practised in arms, hearty gunners, all
bristling for the defence of this country. (Cheers.) believe
this country, put to the proof, would exhibit such a spectacle
as neither ancient nor modern history records. (Cheers.)
But because we are free from fear we should not omit precau
tions. I hope and trust you will support, and encourage us to
support, any Government of whatever party, which may
propose just measures of a strictly defensive character, de-
termined to uphold the honour and maintain the interests
of the country in any and every emergency ; and I trust
you will support us also in carrying those domestic measures
which, going in the ancient paths of the constitution, and
by the light of experience, shall more and more cement to-
gether the hearts of all the subjects of the _Queen; and if
our enemies be strong we shall be found united cordially
together. I trust when I next address you T shall have
to address a more extended constituency, and that the
measures of reform which will be carried in the ensuing
Parliament will be such as will add to the strength and use-
fulness of our institutions, and increase the prosperity and
contentment of the people. (Loud cheers.)
Thanks were then, upon the motion of Mr. LANGSTON,
seconded by Mr. CARDWELL, voted to the Mayor, and he
.having acknowledged the compliment, the proceedings ter •
minated.

CARLISLE.
The nomination for this city took place on Thursday in
front of the Town-hall. There were about 5,000 persons
present. Sir James Graham was met on Eden-bridge at 10
o'clock by a large number of the friends of the Liberal can-
didates, and be and Mr. Lawson were escorted to the Coffee-
house, whence they shortly afterwards proceeded to the
hustings. Mr. W. N. Hodgson, the Conservative candidate,
was met by his friends at the Athenaeum, and was accom-
panied from there to the hustings. The usual preliminaries
having been gone throush,
Mr. T. DONALD, of Lmstock, a freeman of the city, pro-
posed Sir James raham as a fit and proper person to re-
present Carlisle in Parliament.
Mr. JOHN IRVING seconded the motion.
Mr. G. H. HEAD, banker, proposed Mr. W. N. Hodgson.
Mr. T. NASON, a new borough magistrate, seconded the
motion. _ _

SHEFFIELD.
The nomination of candidates for the borough of Sheffield
took place yesterday.
W. FISHER, men., gsg.„prpp9kecl Jehn. Arthur Roebuck,
M
Esq. -
Mr. Alderman DUNN seconded the nomination.
Mr. Alderman H. E. Hoots proposed Geo:Hadfield, Esq.
Mr. R. LEADER, jun., seconded the nomination of Mr.
Hadfield.
No other candidate being proposed, Mr. Roebuck and Mr.
Hadfield were declared by the Mayor to be dirk* elected.
The proceedings were at this point adjourned to the Tern.
perance-hall, when the Mayor again took the chair.
Mr. ROEBVCK then addressed the meeting. In the course
of his address he said—We are now upon a time of greater
danger and doubt than I ever remember during my political
life. (Hear, hear.) And upon the condUct of the men
sent to Parliameut—the Parliament of England—upon
this occasion, will depend the peace and the happiness of
mankind. (Hear, hear.) If we be wise, if we be prudent,
if we be honest—(hear, hear)—then I think we may face
the danger that is before us, and steer the vessel through all
the rocks and shallows which she will have to thread. But,
if it should so happen that you should send to Parlia-
ment to represent you men who are unworthy of you, who
are not prepared either with the honesty or intelligence re-
quisite, then indeed dire may be the misfortune which may
befal England. We have before us two great matters—one
relating to our internal concerns' the other relating to the
peace and happiness of the world at large. Upon the sub-
ject, sir, of home importance—viz., the Reform Bill, I
think you all know my opinions, and the opinions of my
hon. friend. (Hear, hear.) We are here because we would
not give our sanction to a sham. (Cheers.) Tho late Pare
'fitment was dissolved for no great public purpose--(hear,
hear)—but to suit private advantages. (Hear, hear, and
cheers.) At this time, when the world's happiness is
trembling in the balance, ought you not to have had a
stable and a powerful government acting in your name ?
(Hear, hear.) But, notwithstanding we all saw the danger
which threatened, Lord Derby and our administration dis-
solved the Parliament, and l ngland is now without a go-
vernment. (Hear, hear.) And what does take place, sir ?
Why, it was clear to every man who knew anything of poli-
tics that, when last Saturday arrived, the despots of Eu-
rope would know that they, were to act according to their
desires, and we all predicted that war would be the imme-
diate result. And what has happened ? (Hear, hear.) Why,
upon that very day, we are told, the ultimatum of ustna
went to Sardinia. "War has happened, and though the mys-
tifications of the telegraph are now taking place, be you
sure that war has happened, and that the fields of Italy will
be deluged with blood. For what has this taken place ?
Under the guise of being a friend of freedom, the despot of
France—(loud cheers)—is determined, for his own personal
purposes, to break the peace of the world. It is he who has
done the evil deed, and though Austria has no sympathy
of mine—(hear, hear)—though I think she has put her
armed heel upon the poor Italian, though misery has
been the result of her dominion there, still for this war she
is not answerable. (Cheers.) It is Louis Napoleon, the
tyrant of France. (Hear, hear, and much applause.) Of
that man I have spoken before—(hear, hear)—and I recol-
lect when I spoken upon the Conspiracy Bill my friends
came to me and said, " You're mad, Roebuck." And what
did one of those very men say to me two days ago ? " I
thought you mad upon that occasion ; I now see you were
the only man that was right." You cannot get good from
bad men. (Hear, hear.) The tyrant gives no man liberty.
(Hear, hear.) He who has cloven down all that was good
in the government cf his own country will not liberate
ethers. (Hear, hear.) He who has broken every oath, who
has steeped himself in perjury up to the very lips ; he who
has stricken down men, women and children in Paris, will
not be the friend of freedom' in Italy (Haar, hear.) There-
fore my friends—constituents now I call you—l go to Par-
liament in your name, determined to protect England
against the machinations of that man. (Cheers.) Friends
of mine, friend of freedom, friends of peace, often have said
to me, "Have faith in the good sense of mankind, don't
arm yourself; don't prepare for mischief; have faith in ne-
gotiations ; mankind are wise, and they will seek out their
own interests." My answer has always been, "My good
friends, I wish as well to mankind as you do, but I've not
that great faith in their good sense." (Cheers.? How has
the result proved at the very present time ? Why, with
England, and with all Europe pretty nearly, desirous o f
peace, we have been unable by negotiation to put the curb
upon the tyrants' rule. They have gone to war; and what
has England now to do? Why, my friends, we shall be
obliged to call upon you for the produce of your labour to
protect yourselves, to protect your wives and children, to
protect the great name of England. (Loud applause.) I
know not what my colleague may say to this, for he is one
of those easy-fated men who have great reliance upon the
good sense of our fellow-countrymen—(" Hear, hear," and
laughter)—and I believe ho is what is called a friend of
peace. (Hear, hear.). lam also a friend of peace—(loud
cheers)—but the difference between my friend and my-
self is this. I say that amongst the nations
of the world, if England wishes to maintain
peace she should show herself dangerous if she is meddled
with. (Hear, hear.) The time has not yet arrived when,
smitten on one cheek, it is wise to offer the other. (Hear.)
If a man smite me I smite him. (Cries of " Hear, hear,"
and vehement cheering.) And if England wishes to beThe
arbitress of peace let her be prepared for war. (Hear, hear.)
If the world around her should know that the least infringe-
ment of the territory of England shall be followed by an
instantaneous and terrible retribution, then I say England
will be safe. But if it should ever so happen that in the
British Channel a French and Russian fleet should ride
triumphant, where would be your commerce, where would
be your safety, where would be England's power, where the
civilisation of mankind ? That that fleet shall shall not ride
triumphant in the Channel will be one of my first conside-
rations. (Tremendous plaudits.) There is nothing that I
would not do—there is no vote that I would not pass—to
maintain a triumphant fleet for England in the Channel.
(Cheers.) No man more than I can deprecate the horror,
the folly, the terrors of war ; and everything that I can do
in your name shall be done to keep the people -of England
out of the terrible struggle that is about to take place. Mr.
Roebuck concluded his address as follows :—What have we
to do when we go to Parliament ? We shall have first to
determine who shall govern this country ; and my belief is
that a month shall not have passed away after the next
meeting of Parliament before you will have .a chais-ef-Ad-
ministration. (Applause.) That will be the vei gees-
tion we shall have to decide. Then we shall Faye,'
what power shall be conferred upon the working claasee of
this country ; then we shall have to decide that great, that
terrible question. "What shall England do td maintain
herself free from the turmoil of war—safe amidst a Contend-
ing world ?" That we shall have to decide. (Hear, hear.)
For the consideration of that great question, then, will be
required the greatest possible prudence, the greatest possible
calmness and long- sightedness. (Applause.) There must be
no consideration of self—no paltry, petty consideration of
party. (Cheers.) We shall have confided thus England's
safety—England's glory. And if at that great moment we
allow any base personal consideration to influence our mind
and our determination, we shall be unworthy of our posi-
tion—we shall be unworthy of you. (Cheers.) For be-
lieve me, I am not one who flatters, and am not one who
speaks to people that which I believe will tickle their ears ;
but I have ever said, because I always thought, that the
great interests of mankind are now confided to the people of
England. The interests of the people of England Ann be
confided to our coming Parliament, and to the House of
Commons of the spring of 1859 the world's regards will be
fixed for centuries to come. (Cheers.) Sir, on this theme,
I could dilate, but I must recollect that I have a colleague
who will speak at length to you —(go on, goon)—and Isbell
be wearying you. (Go on, go on.) But let me make one
appeal to you, and through you to England. At this time
we are called upon to make a government. We have before
us the happiness of England in our domestic concerns, We
have before us the happiness of the world in peace or war:
Upon the electoral body of England now depends the fore
tunes of mankind, and I entreat them, I trust to them, to
forget all personal considerations. Let themongort:ebeateowonbeifinedbeelt:
Artifices. Let them not be studious of personal conatfr,
tions. Let them think only of their own duty to..,Y7cr
and to mankind. (Applause.) So doing they ‘ni`
bod
Parliament that shall confer power upon theort. Yof
working. classes. They will send to 1" "* al` men
who will maintain peace. These are the tw„amA I promise
we soon shall have to promote ; and in rtrh-all
you that, so far as my power goes, powini b
to you, and peace, under Prowiviaidenace.:
(Loud and prolonged cheering.)_iefra-sed:te the(2,f
telt:'lankeeaitiii:taig teanddh
Mr. HADFIBLD afterwards
e
the proceedings concluded
Mayor.

Mr. W. SUTTON, of Scotby, in an energetic speech, then
proposed Mr. Wilfred Lawson as the Liberal candidate in
conjunction with Sir James Graham.

Mr. GEO. ROBINSON, miller, seconded the nomination.
Sir JAMES Gnanam, who was received with cheers and
uproar, after some introductory remarks, said—Since I last
addressed you public affairs have assumed a much more
serious aspect. What has become of that peace-preserver,
Lord Derby? Where is the peace of Europe? W hat is the
account we have received to-day ? Russia and France are in
close alliance. Since the peace of Tilsit in 1808, when
Russia and France were in mutual alliance, menacing the
liberties and independence of all Europe, no such crisis in
my memory has occurred as that of which we have re-
ceived information to-day. (Hear and applause.) Well,
Lord Derby on Friday last, advised her Majesty to dissolve
her Parliament, and on Monday he found it necessary to
explain the policy which he had indicated in his place in
the House of Lords only one week before; and from whence
do you think he found it necessary in this great crisis to
address the people of the United Kingdom ? Why, from
the Lord Mayor's table at the Mansion-house, in the City
of London. (Hear, and laughter.) No longer able to ad-
dress the assembled Parliament, no longer able to take
counsel of the great council of the nation, he is driven by
an act of his own actually to explain his policy from the
Mansion-house in an after-dinner speech. (Laughter and
applause.) Now it was proposed in the House of Com-
mons to offer obstruction, when the difficulties of the state '
were not nearly so great, to the exercise of the royal pre-
rogative in declaring a dissolution. lin my place objected
to any such obstruction. I said that it was the undoubted
prerogative of the Crown, acting under the advice of its
responsible ministers. to dissolve Parliament, and I would
not be a party to any obstruction. But I said this, and I
said it in the presence of the ministers—" A day of heavy
reckoning will come; you will have to meet a new Parlia-
ment." No ministers in my memory ever incurred such
responsibility ; and I say it now, that day of reckoning will
be on the 31st of May, when this writ is returnable ; and I
tell you that I shall anxiously join with those who will call
Lord Derby and the ministers to account for the great risk
and danger which they have incurred by counselling this
dissolution. (Applause.) Now, I hear also of the policy
of my Lord Malmesbury, the Foreign Secretary
of State—that he is the great mainstay of the :peace
of Europe—and that it is necessary to sustain the
honour of England that he shall continue to ffil his
present office. Now, "maintaining the honour of Eng-
land I" You have heard something, I have no doubt,
of a quarrel between France and Portugal with regard to the
slave trade. Portugal had the strongest claim upon the
assistance and support of England, she having put down the
slave trade at the instance of England. France had been
trading in slaves upon the coast of Portugal. The Portu-
guese Government captured the French vessel so trading.
France sent a naval force to the Tagus to demand the re-
lease of that vessel. There is on these hustings the brother
of our Minister at Portugal, a man venerated by all here—
the brother of Mr. Howard, of Corby. He was not wanting,
I am sure, in the faithful discharge of his duty ; but still,
acting under the orders of Lord Malmesbury, he sang more
small upon that occasion than any British Minister ever did
in my memory, and the honour of England upon that occa-
sion was sustained by Lord Malmesbury intimating to the
Portuguese Government that the French Government was
strong, and they were weak, and the sooner they submitted
the better. (Laughter and applause.) Well, now, " the
honour of England sustained by Lord Malmesbury." With
reference to this very same slave trade, a question arose
between the United States of America and England. The
slave trade cannot be put down upon the high seas unless
the flag supposed under suspicious circumstances to be car-
rying slaves is visited by the British cruisers. That right
of visit has from the very commencement of our efforts to
put down the slave trade been.exercised upon the high seas ;
and what did this champion of the honour of England do ?
Why, in a single personal communication with the Minister
of the United States, he remonstrating against this accus-
tomed right of visit, it was renounced and abandoned by
Lord Malmesbury ; and this champion of the honour of
England did on that occasion renounce a right, a maritime
right, on the part of England, which every Foreign Minister
for the last 30 years has not hesitated to uphold. Now, so
much for this champion of the honour of England. Well,
now, there is the First Lord of the Admiralty. What
has he done ? He has boasted that he was about to
re-construct the British navy. What is his re-construc-
tion ? His reconstruction of the British navy has been
the introduction into the Board of Admiralty of a principle
never known there before, converting it into an electioneer-
ing machine. Sir John Pakington, too, made a speech at
the Mansion-house on Monday last, and what did he say ?
With very great cruelty he commented upon the character
of the Parliament that was dead. He kicked the dead lion.
He said the Parliament which has just expired was a China
Parliament, and deserved only to be broken. (Laughter.)
Ho treated it like a potter's vessel, like a china utensil, that
you might break at pleasure. But again, I say, on the 31st
of May a new Parliament will be returned—a Parliament of
rougher and stronger materials, I hope, than the last ; and
woe betide that Minister on whom that Parliament shall
fall—woe betide him, for I tell you that this Parliament
about to be assembled, if it fall upon, any Minister, will
grind him to powder. ( A Voice—" Jemmy, you would
like to be in the new Parliament 1" and laughter.) Yes '• I
am a candidate here to be in the new Parliament ; and I
seek no object of my own by obtaining a seat there. Often
have I relinquished personal advantages in your service.
I am ready to do so again, and if you send me to Parlia-
ment, I again repeat that an account shall be given for this
dissolution ; and though the last Parliament was broken
like china, I am mistaken if the next Parliament does not
break something else. (Cheers.) Well now, I see, at the
Red Lion it is said that I am a factious opponent of the pre-
sent Government, and some surprise has been expressed at
the course taken by me. Now you will remember that at
the last general election I was not friendly to Lord Pal-
merston. I stated my objections frankly and candidly on
that occasion. I took part in the vote which turned him
out of office. I will not talk of the conduct of others on
that occasion. I objected to the Conspiracy to Murder
Bill—(hear, hear)—which I thought was brought in
under undue dictation from the French Government. I
was opposed to that bill. Others on the other side of
the hustings were not opposed on principle to that
bill ; and yet, when it came to the point of turning
out Lord Palmerston, they joined with me in the
vote which condemned the bill. But having turned Lord
Palmerston out of office, it did appear to me absolutely ne-
cessary to give a fair trial to the Government which suc-
ceeded him ; and on that ground, on public grounds, I did
during last session give a fair trial to Lord Derby's Govern-
ment. They introduced, to be sure, an India Bill so fla-
grantly absurd that they had to withdraw it without even
bringing it under discussion. That was their first India
Bill ; but looking at the difficulties of their position, I as-
sisted them to the best of my power top ass the second bill.
I agreed in the opinion expressed on Lord Canning's Oude
proclamation, and during lag session I gave them a candid
and independent support. Something I see is made of the
trifling circumstance of the side of the house on which I
happen to sit. lam sorry to say that I am among the
oldest members of the house ; and having occupied one
place, without reference to change of parties—l occupied it
in Lord Palmeretcnee time—l occupied it in Lord Derby's;
but I have always made it understood, so occupying it, I
was not to be included among Lord Derby's supporters.
That I think was distinctly understood. Now, have I al-
ways given an unqualified support to Lord Derby's admi-
nistration ? What was my conduct in respect to the Church
Date Bill ? Did I support Lord Derby's measure in respect
to church rates? Having given an explanation in refer-
ence to a statement he had made on the subject of Mr.
Hodgson's support of the Jew Bill, the hon. gentleman
continued :—Now, let us come to the Reform Bill. I find
that Mr. Hodgson says that " Able and honest statesman,
unconnected save by a desire to discharge the onerous
duties which the British nation and Queen have imposed
upon. hem, undertook to bring in a Reform Bill." Now,
I shall not stand here to say that notwithstanding all the
antecedents of that Government it was not competent
to them to deal with this question; but dealing with it
their mode of dealing with it must necessarily be viewed
with suspicion. Now, " able and honest statesmen,
unconnected, save by a desire to discharge their oner-
ous duties." Have these able and honest statesmen
been of one mind with respect to this Reform Bill ? Are
not Mr. Walpole and Mr. Henley honest statesmen ?
What did they say to this measure? They said that the
refusal to reduce the franchise below £lO was fatal to the
measure, was dangerous in their opinion, and inconsistent
with the content sought to be attained by passing
a Reform
Bill. And like honest men, entertaining that opinion, they
withdrew from Lord Derby's Qoyeruumit, withdrew

DOVER.

members of Parliament for the
took place yesterday atnoon. The hust-
The nomination of ove.
in. the I:aarhtt-place,_ where a dense crowd
four or five thousand persons. A.
bin)gsrouwgehreoferecDotedver
assembled, numberzng
great deal of nprot and disorder prevailed throughout the
whicu were repeatedly interrupted for half art
hProt)cureeadti:gethr% e ; and so much of the day was wasted in
senseless clamour and violence, ithat it was nearly four .
o'clock before Mr. Bernal Osborne, the first candidate pro-
posed, could get a hearing.
The Mayor, Dr. ASTELL, having opened the proceedings,
Mr. STERIKER F INNIS proposed, and Mr. REEK seconded,
the nomination of Ralph Osborne, E.lll-.
Mr. J. WORSFOLD proposed, and tur. „,• ALOBINSON,
auctioneer, seconded, the nomination of Lieut.-Col. Sir W.
Russell, Bart.
The seconder made a length,' speech, d‘riAll which the