The Sun.
London, England, 1857-03-04 00:00:00

Twenty-eight ran.

village Cook I'. 11- Cooke SELLING STAKES.
V
2

Three ran.

LATEST BELTING.
LIVERPOOL STEEPLECHASE.
11 to 2 agat Escape (taken)
9to 1 agst Hopeless Star (taken in force)
12 to 1 agst Teddesley (taken)

NPXR,IAL PARLIAMENT.

YOUSE OF COMMONS—(This Day.)
The sr_
Tiler AMIER took the chair at 12 o'clock.
00usen waB nct excitement in the house orlobbies, in
one ofLe.lice of. the result of last night's debate. Only
coal Cabinet minister, Mr. Baines, was pregent at the
1 oZecnirinent of the sitting, but he left before half-past

The PRIVATE BUSINESS.
It- • following private bills were read a second time, (ill Ordered. to be committed : Caledonian Railway
lintlllllll4lg Power), and the DExthorpe Turnpike Trust

On the INDUSTRIAL SCHOOLS.
1,1 -e motion for the second reading of this bill,
that dr- 41-COOK moved that it be read a second time
C 43• Bi/C months. He did so on the ground that the
a% 'unnecessary.
1;11% TIADFIELD seconded the motion.
eop r,I3AINES, on the part of the Government,
1,0411°,14ed the principle of the bill, and stated that he
detail' give his assistance in committee to improve its
s,
kr
and • BAXTER supported the principles of the bill,
du t.a some interesting details of the working of in-
to rud schools in Scotland.
bsi,,r:zl STANLEY supported the principle of the bill,
3ivr-"•4rig it was thoroughly sound in principle.
trl% GORDON also supported the bill.
_ot NEWDEGATE opposed the bill. He objected
isef-‘tiddren whe were guilty of no crime but destitution
s,-1)e sent to a reformatory school. He thought the
°llrhouse schools might be improved so as to meet
theevil complained of.
r• BOWYER objected to the principles and details
it tile bill. There was no protection for the religious teach-
11q of destitute Romax Catholic children. An expiring
ih7liatnent could not consider this bill as it ought, and
tntBugZested that this bill should be withdrawn for ma-
lconsideration and re-introduced another session.
ushould divide the house upon it.
1,471 t. A.DDERLEY said it was the duty of this Pasha-
lat. to complete the work it had begun, and defended
to Principles Principles of the bill. It was rendered necessary
th Illeet the wants of
ouro criminal population. He denied
this bill was of proelytising character, and that
trt.reat care bad been taken to avoid it.
A. BLACK sopported the bill.
-r, supported the bill. Industrial schools
yeeu tried in Birmingham and found successful. He
ter,
tled that the measure was of a proselytising charac-
eahi 13-A-LK was of opinion that this bill, whilst appli-
i e
'l4lrictsto large towns, would not answer for the rural
ksie G•
bat fr G. STRICKLAND opposed the principle of the
Rer °to a feeling that the house was introducing a (WI-
N:3 Principle by the adoption of an educational rate.
Zeal tha Principle would swamp the excellent voluntary
cif
ad' at now
existed in favour of education. Instead
if cart u'a. twing
would catch ation they would retard it. The bill,
o aboneir child.
kir
PA.KINGTONparents to
said tbeya mnd b 0 t ust Ideal withren the
jeel,as it stood with reference to destitute children,
atd
dotreed with other hon. members that there were ob-
tho '8 to the details of the measure, but as he
ught
". should might be got over in committee
support the principle of the bill. There ap-
tied .41 be a desire of separating education into three
soasses• One was national schools, which he hoped soon
sv. 6ee general ; the second, reformatories for dealing
ith
b our criminal classes, which, to a certain extent, had
Ind
established, and which he hoped to see inoreased
-tcl the third, industrial schools to be intermediate be- national schools and reformatories. This bill ap-
L""red in its details to entrench on the national schools
-Lid the functions of the guardians, but he thought them
ZADable of amendment. What his hon. friend proposed
e 7, understood was to provide for the children of the in-
termediate class between the honest poor and criminals,
4:13134 who were, as Miss Carpenter had described them,
" perishing and dangerous class." After
dkillding to the progress made in the establishment of ins
atrial schools in Scotland, the right hon. baronet said
hill, had much pleasure in supporting the principles of this

Xr. BALL supported the bill, and said that if they
'were to spend as much money on the education of the
children in the rural districts as they did on
their horses and dogs, the children would be in a
rtiore advanced
large stattowns.e, as regarded morals and religion,
ban those in
said
Id.r. HENLEY supported, the bill, which ought, he
, to be used as supplementary to the Reformatories
(Government) Bill.
Mr. BARROW opposed the bill.
Sir S. NORTHCOTE replied to the various objections
that had been urged against the bill. It was intended
for the intermediate class referred to, and thereby save
the heavy expense of 7s. per week per head, which their
children cost the country in reformatories. The Principle
of the bill was to give education gratuitously, but that
the parent should pay for the experure of his child's
Maintenanee, and where that was impossible that 3s.
Per week per head should be taken from the poor rates,
Which was the maximum cost of maintenance of children
in workhouses. To a certain extent this was a bill
founded on the voluntary principle. He had no wish to
proselytise, .:and he did not consider that the bill gave
Militias fir it,
Mr. DUNLOP expressed his gratification at the in-
troduction of this bill.
After some remarks from Mr. Liddell, Mr. C. For-
teem°, Mr. Sergeant Shee, and Mr. Warner,
Mr. A.LCOCIC. withdrew his amendment, and
The bill WAG read a second time without a division,
and ordered to be committed.
EDUCATION
On the motion (CITIES AND BOROUGHS) BILL.
for the second reading of tbis bill,
Mr. HADFIELD
against the bill, viz.-4r
presented the following petitions
other buildings in the city?Or owners of land, houses., and
the Town-hall, mariehe
11 ir-
elan on their behalf ; of Manchester, assembled at
inha. and signed by their c Iran
at
ouodants and ratepayers, M. :
cheater, assembled
Morley, Esq., and the Rev. ac meeting ; and, Samuel
secretary of the Committee • Erd Friends•liitito,
ocfhavirmolaunntaanryd
Education in London. an
The petitions were read
Other Clerk at the table.
uragainst the bill.
Other petitions were
In reply to a quf,stion from
ted
postpon.ed°Tlllle)Esisecond reading
Sir J. PAICINGTON
of this bill till this day week.
postponed.
The second reading was accordingly
(TITLES
COURT OF CH ANCERY (IRELAN OF PURCHASERS) BILL
Mr.. WEnreSIDE moved the second r In. of this
bill, the object of which were to secure etah iliiles to
h
estate obtained through the Court of
Chan°
oe.). the principle was allowed in the Encery (Ire.
c
R'..tates Court, and it ought to be
granted to t cumbered
he Court
40 Chancery.
Mr. G. BUTT seconded the motion.
)
Mr. FITZGERALD (the Irish Atto:no.,.G.
opposed the motion. His main obie•L'cion to it waens it was dealing in a fragmentary manner with that
great subject., and in a. way to undermine onea
of the "moot beneficial reforms that had ever b
ferred on Ireland
He would ,viz , the Encumbered Estateseenn"
Court.co
which hal
1 been
consent to the undermining of that
en F3O beneficial to Ireland. Ile considered
it hater not to
atchwork legislation, but adopt this p
wait and see how the Court of Chancery worked out its
own. reformation, in accordance with the act of last se
Con. Re did Dot iutezd to divide_ the bowie, but allow
"