The Sun.
London, England, 1861-02-28 00:00:00

THE YELVERTON MARRIAGE CASE.

COUR': OF COMMON PLEAS, DUBLIN, FEB. 26.
TIJELWALL V. YELVERTON—FIFTH DAT.
As or the previous days of the hearing of this
most imeresting and important case the excitement
that prevailed and the anxiety to obtain admission
to the court were intense. Long before the open-
ing of tie court a considerable number of ladies and
gentlemen were admitted by the private entrance to
the gallery, and when the doors were thrown open
a tremendous rush ensued, and the court in every
part, and the approaches thereto, became speedily
crowded, and not so much as standing room could
be procured within earshot of the bench and bar.
At half-past ten o'clock the jury having been
called and answered to their names, and the Chief
Justice having taken his seat on the bench,
The Rev. Dr. O'Connell, P.P., Irishtown, was
sworn and examined by Mr. Whiteside—l was in
court yesterday when the Rev. Mr. Mooney was
examined, and the marriage stated by him was a
perfectly valid marriage according to the rites of
the Church of Rome.
Mr. Sergeant Armstrong objected to the evidence.
Mr. Waldron Borroughs, J.P., examined by Mr.
Whiteside—l know the Rev. Mr. Mooney. I belong
to his congregation, but not particularly to his
Church. I know the church at Rostrevor. I have
had a conversation with the Rev. Mr. Mooney
about this marriage. This was at his own house
at dinner, a little preceding dinner-time, in March,
1859. I began to banter the Rev. Mr. Mooney
as to the scrape he had got into about this
marriage. He intimated to me, in a very signifi-
cant manner, that he had made them man and wife.
He said he had incurred no ecclesiastical censure.
To take a rise out of him, and at his particular in-
stance, I told him what was the law on the subject
of marrying a Protestant and a Catholic. He feared
that he would be transported. (Laughter.)
B. H. Lancaster, Esq.—l am a member of the
bar of Scotland ; have studied the law of Scotland
as to marriage ; consent only is necessary ; no form
is required; no ceremony; no public notice ; no
cohabitation; not even witnesses; perfect matri-
monial consent may be interchanged without the
presence of any third party.
Is there any particular way by the law of Scot-
land by which this may be proved P—No ; it may
be proved by subsequent acknowledgments, written
or verbal, or by oath ; or, in fact, by any evidence
that can prove the fact.
P a man consents to take a woman for his wife,
and that woman consents to take a man for her
husband, and that is proved, is that a marriage by
the law of Scotland P—Yes ; cohabitation is not
required to strengthen the consent of marriage.
Is a subsequent acknowledgment of a prior con-
sent in Scotland an acknowledgment of the mar-
riage P—Yes, unquestionably. A course of letters
or conduct avowing the relationship of husband and
wife would be a presumption that the consent must
hays passed between the parties.
Cross-examined by Dr. Ball—There are three
modes of constituting an irregular marriage in
Scotland—first, habit and repute; secondly, pro-
mise followed by copula ; third, acknowledgment,
per verbide presenti ; consent, without a third party
being present, constitutes a marriage.
In reply to Dr. Ball, the witness said that he had
been brought in as counsel in the case of Mrs. Yel-
verton in Scotland, to take the place of a learned
brother who had fallen ill. He had been called to
the bar about three years,
Sergeant Sullivan submitted some documentary
evidence in reference to Mr. Yelverton's passage on
board the Great Briton steamer from Malta to
Southampton, from the 24th of March to the sth of
April, 1855.
Sergeant Sullivan here read a translation of
Father Mooney's certificate of marriage, in the
chapel of Kilbroney, in the diocese of Dromore, in
1857. He also read a letter from Rev. Bernard
Mooney "enclosing Mrs. Yelverton'a certificate of
marriage, in which he congratulated her on the
prospect of the birth of a child.
'The following is the Rev. Mr. Mooney's letter :
" Rostrevor, Jan. 15, 1858.
si Dear Madame,—l had great pleasure in receiv-
ing your long-expected letter, communicating the
goad news of the expected arrival of a young
stranger. You exactly state :the truth when you
say I took great interest in your spiritual welfare,
and I assure you I shall always do so when any
opportunity may occur. I feel very great pleasure
in forwarding to you the enclosed certificate of
your marriage. I need not assure you that your
secret is quite safe in my,hands.—Faithfully yours
in /eons Christ, " BERNARD MOONEY."
Tie case for the plaintiff having closed,
Me Brewster, Q.C., rose to address the court and
jury for the defendant. After some prefatory
observations, the learned gentleman contended
that the case was not as between Mr. Thelwall
aid Yr. Yelverton, but between Mrs. and Mr.
lelverfon. Mr. Thelwall was the champion of
Nrs. Yelverton, who was admitted as a witness to
sustain a ease iu which she could not he either the
plaintiff or witness in a case against her husband.
lie admitted that Mrs. Yelverton was a woman
of great talent, perhaps the most highly-
ifted woman he had ever seen. These talents
were highly cultivated, whether in the best
sdiools or not he could nut say, for her success
would be the utter ruin of her husband, with whom
sfe would fall as irreparably ruined. Ho was pre-
twheas
onnottr a trhye,
he had done all in his power to avoid her. She was
pi
wooerred ton provethe intimacy;
that A'l Major obru
but that,
Yelvertonon
a woman of the strongest determination that could
be conceived. He commented upon the letters of
Mrs. Yelverton, and upon the description she gave
of her father. He said this was enough to make
one's blood curdle. That she wrote that letter at
such a time was extraordinary; and he did not
think say man could think that the writer of it
was the wife of Major Yelverton. He was endea-
vouring to put before them the character of those
parties. Mr, Brewster read some passages from
Mrs. Yelverton's letters, and commented upon the
descriptions which he said Mrs. Yelverton had given
of herself. In considering the case between the
parties, they should remember the views of a woman
in society. This lady wrote to Major Yelverton,
saying that she would go to Albania with him,
and watch the sun rise for him, and give him part
of her " pladdie," if he were as good as she was.
All that occurred before ever a word about the
marriage had been tittered by Major Yelverton.
He did net deny to the fair sex the privilege of
becoming the wooers if they thought fit. That
might be for good or ill, but he thought that in
country they shmild stick ta the old ens-
tom, and that the gentleman should tollovr the
lady, and not the lady the gentleman. Major
Yelverton *at an bitter in the artily ; he tonld not
sat: whether he was good-looking, but that he had
sone attractions there could be no doubt from the
fact of his having captivated a lady like Mrs. Yel.
voter): He did not dens> that he Used her badly,
but that was no reason why she should be his rife;
If she had come here in a, breach of promise of mar-
riage case, it would be their duty to consider how
far he, had Used her well or ill. As to the evidence
of Mr. Lancaster, he did not think he had stated
correctly the lath of Scotland; The leached Coun-
sel here proceeded to comment upon the facts of the
case, commencing with the meeting of Major and
Mrs. Yelverteti on board the steamer when starting
ftoin Boulogne, their arrival in London, the Major
getting a cab, and calling upon the lady in London.
Counsel said he was instructed to say the lady was
mistaken in her description of her arrival in Lon.
doll, and that Major Yelverton got into the cab
with her, drove to a house which he thought was
her, lodgings, and there dressed himself. He did
44 mean to convey to the jury that any impro-
priety whatever took place between them on that
°"o.sicm. lie centenued that the lady had been
writing to Major Yelverton to go to Naples to see
her, and that he always found it convenient to let
thelsteamer go without him. He could not believe
that any man who had offered to take a woman to
' be his wife could write a line to lower her in
ber,own estimation, or pollute her mind. He con-
tended that there was not a line in Mrs. Yel-
ver(on's letters to show that she intended mar-
riage; and he was instructed to state that it
was' absolutely and (entirely untrue that the
them at Galata. He ref td a letter from
word marriage was ever uttered between
page 48 of

FEBRUARY 28,

1861.

the printed book, which referred to scandalous
stories about the lady's fair fame, and showed that
she did not write to Yelverton as the man to whom
she had been engaged to be married. He read a
passage—" Oh, if my dear sister Sarah were here,
she would get Ballemy to shoot any one who should
breathe a word about my reputation ;"—and another,
" Could yon come to Smyrna,-if I would go there for
the winter r She wrote again complaining of his
silence, and that brought out a reply which could
not have been roceived by any lady without scorn
and indignation, no matter whether she had been
offered marriage or not. He did not justify the
conduct of Major Yelverton in this matter. Counsel
read the letter in question, in which there were
these words—" Touch me not ; if you do, you go
back infected." The lady explabed that she did
not understand that language, except ti: a figurative
sense. If Major Yelverton were to be married,
would he not have said, " You are to wait for 9,
time ; my family would be inexorable ; we must
wait for a little time and then we will be married."
The question they had to determine was, were they
engaged to be married or not ? What was the use of
the word " infection ?" The use of that word by
Yelverton and other words referred to something
that was not right. He was not quite sure that she
did not intend to yield to the objects of Yelverton.
She had the most perfect confidence in being
able to effect marriage, though that did not at
the time pass through Yelverton's mind. This
was what prompted her to do many acts that she
thought would end innocently. He did not for a
moment attempt to justify Yelverton for his viola-
tion of the moral law. It was for the jury to say
whether such letters could have been written by
parties who contemplated marriage. The only
letter, he said, in which the wor " marriage
occurred, was that written by Mrs. Yelverton from
Bordeaux, when she began to doubt her position.
Mr. Sergeant Sullivan corrected the learned gen-
tleman, and raid that this passsage occurred in the
letter :—" The only sacrifice which I could not
make for you was to keep the marriage secret."
Mr. Brewster resumed—He commented upon the
arrival of Mrs. Yelverton in the Crimea, and her
residence in the house of Mrs. Straubenzie, oppo-
site the hut of Major Yelverton. The visit to the
Crimea ended in a scene on board the steamer at
Balaklava. She gave a distinct denial as to that
occurrence, but a different account of that trans-
action would be gives. They agreed to live together,
but the terms of their connexion was to be con-
sidered as an element in the case. He always
understood that the most delicate reserve was pre•
served between persons about to be married. The
language used by Mrs. Yelverton in her letters
was not the language she should have used to a
person whom she was to admit through the gate
of matrimony to be her partner for life. The learned
gentleman read the following passage from Major
to Mrs. Yelverton :—" I still cannot counsel
you to wait for me: if au opportunity offer
you may wish to embrace, for I feel
my self-command when we do meet, might
annoy you, as my want of it when we last met."
He (Mr. Brewster) would now come to the :esi-
dence of this young lady in Edinburgh, and refer
to the marriages one after the other. Mrs. Yelver-
ton followed the defendant to Scotland, and her
case now was that Major Yelverton married
her there by what was known as a Scotch mar-
riage; but the case he was about to bring forward
in opposition to this was, that it was simply untrue
—that in point of fact no form of marriage ever
took place between them in Scotland, and that
circumstances occurred then and there between
them which had never before occurred. The case
of the defendant as to this wag proved by Mrs. Yel-
verton's letter from Hull, after hOr Edinburgh trip.
It was plain she was not then hi& wife, that she
knew she was not his wife, and that AO doubted if
he would ever make her his wife. The lete!er was
not the letter of a wife to a husband. It was ac.ttu
regret that the defendant was obliged to make the
case that this Scotch marriage was a pure inven-
tion. If it was not, why was not Miss M'Farlane,
who it was said it was agreed was to be told of
it, was not present ? Why should there be no
witnesses when this young lady was in the next
room ? The whole story was incredulous, and the
letters proved its incredulity. Was a woman likely
to ask her husband to burn her letters ? Yet this
young woman, who alleged she was married, in her
first letter after the alleged Scotch marriage, asked
him to burn her letters. The truth was, she was
not married, but she bad a passion for the defen-
dant which overwhelmed her. Ho loved her and
she loved him, but he could not marry ber, and
therefore he avoided her attractive company; but
at last she followed him to Edinburgh, where, un-
fortunately, circumstances occurred which did make
her position a dreadful one. When this occurred
she proposed to the defendant, who always refused
to marry her, that b
should consent to have a
marriage by a Roman Catholic priest so-
lemnised, which would ease her conscience,
although she knew a legal union could not
be had between them on account of the difference
lof their creed. The case was one of the most extra-
ordinary ones which ever came into a court of jus-
tice. In many respects it was so. It differed from
all other such cases in the world in this, that they
had a lady coming forward to vindicate the character
of the man who injured her.
,‘ The Chief Justice—The impression on my mind
of what she said on this subject was, that insinua-
, tions were put forward of improprieties on her part
by the defendant's counsel, that she did not believe
Major Yelverton was capable of putting forward,
as they were wholly untrue.
A Juror—That is exactly the meaning of what
she said. She stated that she did not believe the
defendant had authorised certain questions to be put
to her that reflected on her character, and that were
unfounded.
Mr. Brewster stated that he was do doubt mis-
taken in this matter, having been oiZt of court
when it took place, and would not further' allude
to it, but at once proceed to refer to the
of the defendant and this lady to Malahide.
It would be proved that they had but one
sitting-room and one bedroom, and slept
' together; and that in Newry also they occupied
but one bedroom. While in Newry Major Yelver-
ton proceeded to Rostrevor, and remained there for
Bor 10 days. Part of the time he was in Dublin ;
but when there they occupied the one bed. if Mrs.'
Yelverton's case were true this would be no impu-
tation upon her, but her veracity would turn upon
it. She swore that no intercourse ever took place
until after the Newry marriage. If the Scotch
marriage had taken place at all, it was inconceiv-
able that the defendant would not have insisted on
enjoying the rights of a husband. Major Yelverton
most improperly consented to enter into an invalid
marriage at the lady's request; and he (Mr. Brew-
ster) would admit that the Newry marriage would
have been a valid one if the parties were both Roman
Catholics, but being solemnised between a Protes•
taut and a Roman Catholic it was undoubtedly
illegal, and illegal by statute. God forbid that he
(Mr. Brewster) should attempt to justify the con-
duct of Major Yelverton. The real question
was, was the defendant a professing Roman Catho-
lic for twelve months prior to the marriage ? This
all depended on the credit to be given to Mrs. Yel-
verton h
evidence' fhe had proposed for her, a
Wou-.ld se not have inquired about his re-
s
she said,
new the Avonmores were a Pro-
ligion ? Every one it
1- Barry Yelverton got his
testant family, and that . -In of the Exchequer
peerage, and became Chief Bat,. 'nt could be a
at a time when none but a Protest.. defendant
judge of that court. The truth was the - I't
was then, and always was, a Protestant,
would be proved that he constantly attended the
Established Church up to a few days before the
Irish wedding. Mr. Brewster, in conclusion, said
he had now brought this melancholy case to an end,
as far as he was concerned. The result of the con-
nettion between Major Yelverton and this lady was
what might have been expected. She was about to
become a mother, and he deserted her and married
another woman. If the case of the plaintiff was
sustained the defendant would be ruined. For
him, indeed, he (Mr. Brewster) felt but little; but
he did feel for the woman he had since made his
wife, and for his children, the eldest of whom was
the right heir of the Avonmore peerage, and would
be bastardised if the plaintiff got a verdict. No
Scotch marriage ever took place, and the Irish
marriage was illegal on account of his creed ; and,
under his lordships' direction, he had no doubt
they would feel constrained to find a verdict for the
defendant.
At half-paal 5 o'clock the court adjourned till the
following day.

DUBLIN, WEDNESDAY.
The evidence+ for the defence was commenced
this morning. Major Yelverton has been under
examination all day. The case is expected to be
concluded to-morrow.

THE GosslP or THE " HALL."—Great anxiety is
manifested by the crowds who congregate in the
Hall to see Major Yelverton. He has been in the
Hall off and on during the past three days, but he
was unrecognised, and was consequently not sub-
jected to the attentions of the curious. Major
William Charles Yelverton is now in his 37th year,
having been born in September, 1824. He is the
eldest surviving son, being of the second mar-
riage, of the present Viscount Avonmore with Miss
Cecilia O'Keefe, daughter of the late Charles
O'Keefe, one of the Registrars of the Irish Court of
Chancery. Major Yelverton is, therefore, the great
grandson of the noted Barry Yelverton—the first
Viscount Avonmore. The lady with whom it is
stated Major Yelverton contracted his second mar-
riage is said to be a constant attendant at the trial.
She was the widow of the eminent Professor Forbes,
of the Uniyersity of Edinburgh, by whom she WM

-
bequeathed, it is asserted, a veTy large fortune—
£50,000. This is the talk of the" Hall," but we
are not responsible for its accuracy, We record it
as one of the many statements now being in exten-
sive circulation in connection with this cause ,celebre.
—Freeman's Journal.

THE EMPEROR OF AUPTRIA IN 711..5

COURT OF CILANgERY.

THE EMPEROR OF AUSTRIA v. MESSRS. DAY
AND LOUIS KOSSUTH.—SPURIOUS HUN-
GARIAN NOTES.
Sir Hugh Cairns and Mr. Cotton moved, before
Vice Chancellor Sir J. Stuart, for an injunction to
restrain the defendants, Messrs. Day and Son,
lithographers, from printing or lithographing any
purporting to be the notes of the Hun-
garian state or nation, or impressed with the Royal
arms of Hungary, and from delivering up or parting
with any plates for printing such documents. The
learned counsel stated that the Austrian ambassa-
dor, having applied to the British Government to
atop the act complained of, was informed it was a
civil matter, and only recently obtained authority
from Vienna. The learned counsel read the follow-
ing affidavit, which was nearly an echo of the bill :
" I am the Ambassador to this country of his
Imperial Majesty the Emperor of Austria, who is
the plaintiff in this cause. His Imperial Majesty
is also King of Hungary, and as such he has, in
right of his crown, the sole and exclusive privilege
of issuing, and of authorising the issue, in Hungary
of notes for payment of money flt...'nded to be cir-
culated in that country as money ; ADA also the sole
and exclusive privilege of authorising t.. be affixed
to any document intended to be published Or circu-
lated in Hungary the Royal arms of that cou:ntrY•
" A very large portion, and, to the best of ):11Y
belief, nearly the whole f the present circulation
in Hungary consists of notes of the National Bank
of Austria, which are issued under the authority
of his Imperial Majesty as Emperor of Austria and
King of Hungary ; and these notes, under the
authority of his Imperial Majesty, circulate in
Hungary as money, and are sums of one florin and
upwards each.
" I have been informed, and believe, that the
defendants, William Day, John Day, and Joseph
Day, carry on business in London as lithographers,
in partnership, under the firm of Messrs. Day and
Sons.
" I have been informed, and believe, that the
said Messrs. Day and Sons have prepared plates
for printing or lithographing documents which pur-
port to be notes of the Hungarian nation or State,
and are designed to be circulated as money in that
country ; and I have been informed, and believe,
that they have done this under the direction of
Louis Kossuth, who is one of the above-mentioned
defendants, and that they, by his direction, are now
engaged in printing or lithographing, from the
plates so prepared by them, documents which pur-
port to be such notes as aforesaid ; and which, for
the sake of distinction, I hereafter refer to as spu-
rious notes.
" On the 26th of the present month of February
I obtained one of the said spurious notes which had
been printed by the said Messrs. Day and Sons.
The exhibit marked A, produced and shown to me
at the time of my swearing this affidavit, is the
spurious note so obtained by me. The body of this
document is in the Hungarian language, with
which I am well acquainted; and the arms, of
which there is a print at the bottom, are the royal
arms of that country. The body of the said note,
when translated into English, is as follows :—' One
florin. This monetary note will be received in
every Hungarian State and public pay-office as one
florin in silver—three zwanzigers being one florin ;
and its whole nominal value is guaranteed by the
State, in the name of thenation.—Lows KOSSUTH.'
" I believe that a great number of the spurious
notes which the said Messrs. Day and Son are
manufacturing are for one florin each, and that the
re„:ainder are for other sums, some larger and
some soaller than one florin, and that all these
spurious notes are numbered, and that with the
necessary variation of the number and the amount
which they purport to represent, the same as the
said exhibit A; and I have been informed, and
believe, that the total cominal amount of the spuri-
ous notes which the said Messrs. Day and Sons are
manufacturing will be very large, and will exceed
100,000,000 florins.
" I have been informed, and believe, that the said
Messrs. Day and Son have nearly cotrtpleted the
manufacture of the said spurious notes, and that
they now have in their hands a very large number
thereof, entirely or nearly completed ; and that
they intend very shortly, and (as far as I can ascer-
tain) in the course of the present week, to deliver
the same to the said Louis Kossuth; and I believe,
and, from the information which I, as such ambas-
sador as aforesaid, have obtained, I have no cioubt
that the said Louis Kossuth intends, as soon as 11,2
has received the said spurious notes, without any
authority from his Imperial Majesty, to send the
same to agents employed by him in Hungary ;
and that he intends, by means of his said agents,
to sell some of these spurious notes in Hungary to
persons resident there for whatever sums he can get
for the same, and by this and other means to intro-
duce the same into circulation in Hungary ; and
that he intends to use the remainder of the said
spurious notes in Hungary, among other purposes,
in violation of the rights and prerogatives of the
plaintiff as King of that country ; and I believe,
and from the information which I have received as
such ambassador as aforesaid, I have no doubt the
said Louis Kossuth intends to use the same amongst
other purposes to promote revolution and discord
in Hungary. I, as ambassador of his Imperial Ma-
jesty the Emperor of Austria, know that he has
never authorised the manufacture of the said notes
which the said Messrs. Day and Sons are manufac-
turing or the use thereon of the Royal arms of
Hungary, and I believe that the introduction of ow
said notes into Hungary will create a spurious
circulation there, and by that and other means
cause great detriment to the state and to the sub-
jecLa of his Imperial Majesty. I believe that the
mombetia of the firm of Messrs. Day and Sons, be-
fore they p;:'pared the plates for the said spurious
notes, were aware of the purpose for which the said
Louis Kossuth inteC ded to use the same, and that
he was net authorised by his Imperial Majesty to
prepare and issue the same, and that the said spu-
rious notes were a violation of the rights of the
plaintiff as King of Hungary; I believe that
they intend to deliver the said spurious notes, when
completed, to the said Louis Kossuth. I first re-
ceived information that Messrs. Day and Saris were
engaged in manufacturing the said spurious notes
on the 3d of the present month of February. 00
receiving the information I at once applied to her
Majesty's Principal Secretary of State for Foreign
Affairs, and requested that her Majesty's Govern-
ment would interfere and prevent the manufacture
of the said spurious notes, and on the 23d of the
present month, and not before, I received a reply
from the said Secretary of State, to the effect that
her Majesty's Government were unable to interfere,
aad I thereupon at once communicated with the
government at Vienna of hie Imperial Majesty the
Emperor of Austria; and on the 26th of the pre-
sent month of February, and not before, received
instructions to use the name of his Imperial IViellesty
in such proceedings as I might think necessary to
institute with reference to the said spurious notes."
This Honour said he thought the plaintiff was
entitled to an injunction, the order for which ought
to be served with a copy of the bill. It was not a
case to require any undertaking.

The King of the Belgians having paid, in July
visit to Ghent, was received with remarkable enthu-
'''' a 1-e students of the university of that city ; and his
siasm by tL. -rk
bofsatisfaction, presented to the univer-
Majesty, as a nu._ e preserved in the library. The Bel -
sit y a gold medal, r 4. ce that the King has just sent a
gianjournes now annaof
eoch of the students, who took
bronze copy of that medal to'
part in the demonstration ; ana doing his Majesty calls
the young men " his dear claildrCU.
[ADVERTISEMENT.I-out of 50,060es without medi-
eine, by Du Barry's delicious Rovaleuta a
b' a Food, we
.car
quote a few :—Cure No. 71, of dyspepsia the Rights Hon.
the Lord Stuart de Decies. Curo No. 49,8 b.. Fifty
m
years indescribable agony from dyspepsia, nem lness,
asthma, cough, constipation, flatulency, spasms, sicl.7lflss
at the stomach and vomiting, have been removed by L'u
Barry's excellent food.—Maria Joly, Wortham Ling, near
Dies, Norfolk." Curo No. 4,208.—" Eight years dyspep-
sia, nervousness, debility, with cramps, spasms, nausea,
for which my servant had consulted the advice of many,
have been cured by Du Barry'shealth restoring food.—Rev.
John W. Flavell, Ridlington Rectory, Norfolk." No.
32,836. Three years excessive nervousness, with pains in
my neck and left arm, and general debility, which ren-
dered my life very miserable, has been radically
removed by Du Barry's health restoring food.—Alex. Stuart.
A Pills and Medicines : they invariably aggravate and
re ts? diseases ; their annoyance, disappointment,
n
be avoided by using Du Barry's Food
aviiedtwi expense
may
which, at a few pence For day, saves s(' times its cost in
other remedies, removing effectually, m .gout purging,
constipation, indigestion (dyspepsia) nervous, bilious and
liver complaints and all their consequences. Certificate
No. 36,418. We find it the safest remedy. Andrew Um,
F.R.S., Dr Harvey, Dr. Wurzer, Dr. Shorland, Dr.
Campell, Let invalids avoid the fearful dangers of spu-
rious and injurious imitations offered under a variety of
false pretences. Nevill's imitations are prohibited by the
high Court of Chancery under a penalty of £5,000 against
Alfred Hooper Nevill and his agents ; and the pretences
that Nevill has a patent for Arabica Food and that Du
Barry's are connected with such patent are utterly false.
No canister is genuine without the name Barry Du Barry
and Co., 77, Regent-street, in full, ontheseal and wrapper.
Shopkeepers who attempt imposition in one article must
expect to be distrusted in all others. Packed in tins 11b.
2s. 9d.; 21b. 4s. 6d. ; 51b. lls. ; 121 b. 225. ; 241 b. 40s. The
121 b. and 241 b. canisters are sent carriage free on receipt
of Post-office order by Barry Du Barry and Co., 77, Re-
gent-street, London; Fortnum Mason, and Co.; Abbio,
60, Gracechurch-street ; 4, Cheapside ; 63 and 150, Ox-
bard-street ; 330 and 451, Strand; 49 and 60, Bishopsgate
street ; Batty, 16, Finsbury Pavement ; Phillips and Co-
tea-dealers; Petty, Wood, and Co., King Williani-street,
. City; 127 /LA ; sad & gmeris.