The Sun.
London, England, 1861-06-11 00:00:00

BRITISH. MINES.

Alit Consols(Philack)
British Iron

3.2.10]

Clifford
Devon G. Cons. (Tavist )
East Bassett (Illogan)
East Caradon ......
E. W'l Russel (Tavistk.)
Gam.&St.Aubyn(Gwen.)
Great South Tolgus
G.Wheal Alfci. (Philack)
G. Wheal Vor (Helston)
Grenville
Flerod's-Foot .
Hingston Downs
Lady Bertha
Margaret (tiny Lelant)
North Downs
North Frances (Illogan)
N. Wh '1 Basset (1110 _An);
North Wheal Crotty
Par Consols (St. Blazey)!
Providence (Uny Lelnt.)
Sortridge Cons. Min. Co.
South Caradon(St.Cleer)
S. Carn Brea (Illogan)
S. Dev. Iron &Gen., Lim '
S. Wheal Fran. (Illogan)
Stray Park
Tamar Silv.& Lead Min
Tin Croft
Vale of Towey (Carm )
West Basset (Illogan)
W. Caradon (Liskeard)l
West Seton
Wheal Basset (Illogan)
Wheal Buller(Redruth),
Wheal Edward (Cals.)
Wheal Kitty (U.Lelant)'
Wheal Mary Ann (Men.)
'Wheal Trefawney (Lis.)
FOREIGN

2.14.6
7.4.0

17;
13.12.6

6.8.6
8.12
4.11.8
1.10.6

2
114
1.11.0,
9.18.9

1*
10.6.7

4.18.6

i all
18.1q.9
24.8.0

13s Cdl

1.7.2

g 24

1- 1
186 190
365 375
90 95
27 28

310 820
3 31
130 140
344 361
14 2
5t
184 194
53 56
365 375
90 95
105 115
1& 21
9 10
11 13
14 16

:NES,

20 Australian
1 !BonAccord Copper,Lim. 17.6 d *
20 , Brazil St.J.del Bey,Lim 15 344 354 354
5 Do. Land and Mining Co. all 1 1i
1 ,Clarendon Cons.MinCo. dis.
40 iCobre Copper all 39 41
Copiapo .
1 DunMoun.Cop.Ming Co all 4 4 4
2 Fortuna.
20 General all 24 25
2 'Gt N. Cop. of S. Austr 1 4 ip 14
Kapunda (Limited) 1 11 14 p 24 1
3 Linares all 74 84
5 Lusitanian 2 id jar
Np
0. Rn
tl nnul eigfAuaeodnxiup
c:soefit
Mexican
.er
.u,l(
Lt.
Ls.
e: L.
?a.:
d.
il2isaao.l6isidl.
315144
1 Mariquira all i ft
201
5 Port Philip
28.2114
UnitedSeMotitnl
1 Worthing (Limited) all
Do —
JOINT-STOCK BANKS.
100 AgTa&UnitedService Ilk 60 ,84 66
40 'Australasia
25 Bank of Egypt all 18 19
100 'Bank of London
20 'Bank of Turkey
50 'British North American all 541 4
20 ,Chtd.Bank of India, &c. all 120} 204 104
25 ,Ch. Mer. of In. Lon.& Ch all 31 33
100 !City
100 Colonial . 26 37' 38
20'11 Corn. Bank of Canada all
100 Commercial of London. 20
20 !Eng., Scot., & Aus. Ch all 154 164
20 Gen. Bk .of Switzerland all —•
20 Lon. Char.Bkof Austral all 22 231
20 Do. new 5 141
11
50 London and County
50 London Joint Stock
20 'London and S. African lO i 24 14
100 ',London & Westminster 20 1 654 664 464
100 'Nat. Prov. of England . 12
20 'Do. new ...
50 !National Bank
26 ;New South Wa1e5...... all
25 ,Orient. B. Corporation . all 46 47 444
20 Ottoman Bank ...... all 154 164
100 I Prov mcial of Ireland .. 25
10 ;Do.new. .
25 'South Australia ..
25 ;Union of Australia
50 [Union of London
100 !Unity Mutual
COLONIAL GOVERNMENT SECURITIES.
Can. Gov. 6 p.c.Ja. &July
1877-9 lOO 110 114
Do 6p. cent.lBBo-2 100 111
Do. 6p. cent.lBB3-4 100 -
Do. 6p. c. Feb. & Aug. 100 :08 110 1484
Do. 6p. c. Mar. & Sept. 100 108 110
Do. 5 per cent lOO (014 1014 1014
Cape G.Hope, 6 p c,lBBO 100 1054 1064
Do. 1890 100 106 107
N.B.Gov. 6 p.c. Ja.&July 100 108 100
Do. 6p. c.Ap. & Oct. 100
N. S.W. Gov. sp. c., 1866 100 99 100
Do. sp. c.,1871 to 1876 100 99 100
Do. p.c., 1888 &upwds 100 99 100
Nova Scotia Gov. 6p.
sterling, 1875 lOO 1074 1084
S. Au5,G6p.c.1878.& up lOO
IVic.Gov 6p c. Jr. &July 100
Do. do. 6 p.c. Ap.&Oct lOO 1051 1054

DOCKS.
stock Commercial ., 100 i
stock Do. 4 per Cent.Pref.Min. 100 I
stock jEast and West India .. 100 115 117
stock London
stock St. Katharine. lOO 60 62
stock !Southampton , 100
stock Victoria. "• •1
i 100 96 98
20 iDo New. -. 2 ld par
MISCELLANEOUS.
10 Anglo-Mexican Mint . all 13 14
10 Atlantic K. Ml. Stm (Icl-) 2 2i
1000 Atlantic Tel. (Limited) all
1
25 Australian Agricultural 19 30 32
10 Berlin Water (Limited) all 4i 44
50 British American Land 40
60 B.&l.Mag. Tel. A. (Lim.) all 30 35
20 Do. 8,7p.c.ti111852 (Lim.) all 18 20
20 Do. C. (Limited) all 11 13
324 Canada Land all 110 113
10 Chan.lslands Tel. (Lim\ all
et. Cop.Min.ofEng.&Srnltg. all
25 Do. Pref. 74 per cent.
st. Crystal Palace
st. Do. Preference
st. Do. 6 p ct. Perpet. Deb lOO 106 108
20 E.lndia Irrign. & Canal 1 id 4 d
st. Electric Telegraph
25 Do. New .-... .
5 English &Aus. Copper, all 31 31 31
15 Gen. Steam Navigate nf 14
1 Great Ship I.lmited) all i I
1 Do. 17i pct Preference all
5 Lon. District Tel. (Lim.) 34
4 L.G. Omnibus Co. (Lim.) all i 14
20 Madras Irr. and Canal 1 1 1 If
10 Med. Exten. Tel. (Lim ) all 24 34
25 National Die. Co. (Lim ) 5 14 1. d
20 Nerbu.Coal&lron (Lim ) 5 1 ()id
10 Netherlands Land all '
5 , DO.B p.c.Pref..iss.atl dis. all 4 1
100 iN.l3r.&NovaScotia.Land 80 510
' 1
,N. .Australasian(Lim.) all I 1
1 'Oriental Gas (Limited), all 1 4
'1 Do, New Shares.
ds.
ti
I(3l.riimn. (Lim.).
)).
110058 s . pr 1 I
55152:0g0 oppß rje3ilni.oitt. its..
II:
alli 17
1a lir
(:iisiienl,Sitieam all —175101 —5132
Red Seaain• e '6'
50 Erney Iron all 164 174
" New.......•
15 0' '1 Steam
100 127 130
60 47 49
100 Royal Mai
st. Scot. Austin. r
25South
stored .. • • all i i
1 Do. do. Itegioter
do.
10 Do• nS
cLriapn d
allall 33i 1
150
u.KamndTeAl:C.,eon.c(iii :. .01 1 _i : :
1 ;Submarineotr.Tgoicfnilua.vp.:l_l::,
20 TrA..tu
Trust
LstAnrllacssia (14'1)1' IS.
2.2
-,
1,00
411
mono;
1,o:ion. , 5

LAW INTELLIGENCE—Ohs Day),

COURT OF EXCHEQUER.

(Before the Lord Chief Baron, and Barons Martin and
Bramwell.)
THE CASE OF MR. HATCH.

Mr, M. Chambers, Q.C., on the judges taking their seats
this mornieg, mentioned the case of Hatch v. Lewis, and
asked his lordship whether he had decided upon the course
he intended to take with respect to the costs in the action.
His lordship said he had consulted with the other judges,
and he found two were in favour of granting a certificate
to enable Mr. Hatch to receive his costs, and two were of
the opposite opinion. It would therefore be necessary for
the learned counsel to move for a rule of court calling upon
the defendants to show cause why they should not pay the
costs in the cause.

Mr. Chambers then formally moved for the rule under
the 16 and 16 of Victoria, chap. 54, sec. 4, and cited cases
in support of his argument.

The court granted the application, and the learned coun-
sel drew up the rule in the following terms :
Rule to show cause why plaintiff should not receive his
costs pursuant to the statute of 15 and 16 Victoria, chap.
54, on the ground that there was sufficient reason for
bringing the action into that court. The rule to be drawn
up on reading affidavit, with liberty for both sides to refer
to the judges and short-hand writers' notes.
Mr. Chambers proposed that the rule should be made
returnable to-morrow.

The Court said there was some difficulty about that, as
it was necessary the other parties should have time to con-
skier their arguments.

Mr. Chambers was anxious that the question should be
disposed of to-morrow, because if it was not it would
have to stand over till Michaelmas. He would have the
rule drawn up, and served on Mr. Lewis within an hour of
the present time.

The Lord Chief Baron—You can take ;your rule and
draw it up for to-morrow, but if Mr. Sergeant Shee (who
was not then present) complained that he had not had time
to consider his case, he could not refuse any application he
might make.

Mr. Sergeant Shee here entered the court, and on being
informed by Mr. Lewis of the matter before their lordships,
the learned sergeant said he should most certainly not be in
a position to proceed to-morrow. Ije did not see there was
any reason for pressing the case on.

Mr. Chambers—There is a necessity, because Mr. Hatch
is at this moment in prison.

Mr. Sergeant Shee—Yes but for debts altogether un-
with 111;r3 WAIL.

The Lord Chief Baron, addressing Mr. Chambers: You
can come into court to-morrow if you please, bat if the
learned counsel on the other side replies that he is not in a
position to proceed, the arguments must be postponed. He
did not think there was anything unreasonable in a learned
counsel not being prepared to show cause against a rule the
day after the motion was made.
It is understood that Mr. Chambers intends to proceed
to-morrow morning.

COURT OF DIVORCE.

(Before Sir Cresswell Cresswell and a Common Jury.)

WEBSTER ♦. WEBSTER AND MITTORD.

This was a suit instituted by the husband against his
wife for a dissolution of marriage on the, ground of her adul-
tery with the co-respondent, against whom the petitioner
also claimed damages, which were laid at £5,000.
Dr. Phillimore, Q.C., and Dr. Tristram appeared for the
petitioner ; Dr. Spinks represented the respondent ; and Dr.
Swabey was counsel for the co-respondent.

The parties were married in April, 1852, the petitioner
at the time being an officer in the 98th Foot, serving in
India. The respondent was the daughter of a clergyman
named Hudbrook, but had been adopted by an eminent
medical practitioner named Murray, at York, and during
his life, and in his testamentary disposition, was treated as
the daughter of Dr. Murray. After the marriage the parties
went to India, but not living in perfect harmony, the re-
spondent returned to England in July, 1853, and resided
with Dr. Murray, who is since deceased. The petitioner
shortly after came to this country, and exchanged into the
19th Foot. Prior to the return of the petitioner a daughter
had been born, and that child was the sole issue of the
marriage. The co-respondent was a captain in the 19th
Foot, and upon the petitioner joining that regiment Capt.
Mitford was introduced to and became familiarly acquainted
with the parties. Captain Mitford (the co-respondent)
changed into the 89th Foot, and, as alleged,
an improper intimacy subsisted between him and the
respondent, at Chatham, Gravesend, and other places,
until the year 1859, when, upon the approaching confine-
ment of the respondent, the result, as stated, of her inter-
course with the co-respondent, she went to live entirely
with Captain Mitford, and is at present living with him as
his wife at Lahore, in the East Indies, where he is serving
with his regiment. These facts were fully proved.
Dr. Swabey made no defence on the part of the respon-
dent, admitting the adultery as clearly proved.
Dr. Spinks, for the co-respondent, urged that the case
was not one for heavy damages.
The Judge Ordinary summed up, and the jury found that
the adultery had been committed, and assessed the damages
at £5.

The Court at once pronounced a decree nisi, with costs
against the co-respondent,

CENTRAL CRIMINAL COURT—(This Day.)

OLD COURT.
(Before the Recorder.)
BURGLARY.

Two men named Sugden and Daugin were indicted for
committing a burglary on the premises of Mr. Nicholl and
stealing some wearing apparel.

Evidence proving the facts alleged against the prisoners
having been heard, they were asked in the usual form
what they had to say in answer to the charge.
Daugin said he was passing the house, and, observing
the door open, went to ascertain what was the matter—cer-
tainly not to commit burglary. Sugden also denied posi-
tively the charge.

The jury found both prisoners guilty.
The Recorder said it was a most extraordinary case.
Two respectable men were found in different parts of
another person's house, with portions of the stolen pro-
perty. With respect to the prisoner Sugden, his master
had given him a good character for honesty and attention
to business, and that after a service of four years and a half.
The sentence of the Coutt Was that Dungin, he being the
eldest, should be committed to prison for nine and Sugden
for four months.

POLICE .INTELLIGENCE.—(This Day.)

MARLBOROUGH- STREET.
REFITSINQ TO CARRY A PASRENGER IN AN OMNI-
BIJS.—John Ling, omnibus conductor, badge 1,167, in the
employ of the London General Omnibus Company, was
summoned before Mr. Tyrwhitt for refusing to carry a pas-
senger in omnibus 6,928.

Mr. G. Lewis, of Great Marlborough-street, appeared for
he defendant.

The complainant, a soldi€r, said he hailed the defendant,
and was about to enter the cmnibus, there being room for
one person inside, when the defendant refused to admit
him, saying that he wanted no --- soldiers inside; only
ladies and gentlemen." He was therefore obliged to ride
outside, running the risk of spoiling his clothes through
the rain. A gentleman in the omnibus gave him his name,
and he was now in attendance.

Mr. Phillips, a gentleman residing in Fleet-street, said
he heard the defendant refuse to admit the soldier, saying
using at the same time some
however, saw the defendant
laa
admit
jmewei ott
avl
edg.
ennoHttl
eaemdsmahnoi t7al
_Oa'
fdtieer?

Mr. Lewis said that in point of law no offence was com-
mitted as:to constitute the offence. The complainant should
not have ridden at all, whereas he had ridden outside.
Mr. Tyrwhitt said the only thing was, did the soldier
condone the act by riding outside the omnibus. Any
man who was sober and decent—be he soldier or civilian—
was entitled to ride. He believed the witness for the sol-
dier had no interest in coming forward only from a sense of
justice. It appeared that the conductor did refuse to admit
the man, and perhaps he thought he could get another
passenger on the road. Some people, he knew, had a
terror of red coats. It was a shabby thing to the soldier,
In some countries the man who stood up to defend his
country had the first chance": He knew it might be said
that the man was saving the seat for a passenger, but that
was a dangerous practice to allow. He should fine the
defendant 10s. and costs.

THIS DAY'S MARKETS.

HAY MARKETS.

SMITHFIELD.—MouIow hay, £2
Os to £5 Os Od ; clover
do., £3 Ss to £slBs ; and straw, El 108 to £2 Os per load.
Both hay and straw moved off heavily at drooping cur-
rencies,
percl o, vt sors
4, .
A
L 3 l CUMBERLAND.bdsuItio
t—rSasd :11.8 es
aOd 7; andhay,
Os to £.5 Os ;
straw, £1 12s to £2 Os
WHITECHAPEL. Meadow hay, £2 Os to £5 Os Od ;
c lov e
lead.i, £3 1 A
0 sto
heavy £5
dlQBms a
nO dd ; and straw, £l. 10s to £2 Os
per .