The Sun.
London, England, 1861-10-21 00:00:00

sins to plunder, burn, and violate. Many of the

TILE DUBLIN OUTIZAGE.

COMMITTAL OF THE PRISONER.
The man Curran, arrested on suspicion of having
been the cab-driver who ill-treated Miss Jolly, was

re•examined on Friday at the Dublin Police•court.
Mr. Barry, Q.C., instructed by Mr. Anderson,
prosecuted ; and Mr. Sidney, instructed by Mr.

Fitzgerald, appeared for, the prisoner.
In stating the case for the Crown, Mr. Barry,
after minutely describing the violent character of
the outrage committed upon the young lady. re-
ferred in strong terms to the general feeling of in-
dignation to which this cowardly and atrocious
act had given rise, and said, in these feelings the
law officers of the Crown and those charged with
the administration of justice sincerely participated,

anxious as they were to bring the perpetrator to
justice. But he thought it needless to observe that

he (Mr. Barry) merely appeared there to see justice

shoiild be done; and assist the Court in arriving at

a just conclusion, and to elicit the truth whatever
the result might be, whether to determine the guilt
or prove the innocence of the prisoner. In referring
tethe account which the accused had given of his
whereabouts on the 27th of Sept., when questioned
by the police authorities, and also to his statement
as to the hour he returned home on the night in
question, Mr. Barry remarked there was a very ma-
terial contradiction between that and that of his
employer. According to the prisoner's account he
was in bed at ten o'clock, but the former had de-
posed he did not come home till betwen elev en and
twelve at night.
Miss Louisa Martha Jolly was then called for
examination. As has been already stated, she is a
young lady of very prepossessing appearance, about
20 years of age. She was attended by several ladies
and other relatives, and although naturally much
agitated, she gave her answers to Mr. Barry, Q.C.,
who examined her, with accuracy and distinctness.
When sworn, she deposed as follows :
My name is Louisa Martha Jolly. I have been
residing since the 26th of August last with Mr.
Gelston, atiDulvin's, Rathgar. Up to the time I
came to reside there I had never been in Dub-
lin, but resided in Portarlington with my
father's family. On the evening of the 27th of
September I had been at a religious tea-meeting in
Lombard-street. My brother was with me. He is
an apprentice to Mr. Walsh, apothecary in West-
land-row. I left the meeting at five minutes to 10
o'clock that night. I do not know the streets through
which we passed. When we went some distance I
saw a cab close to the path. I was leaning on my
brother at the time. We were stopped. A man
came from a shop or hall-door cannot say which,
The shops were not open at the time. When he
came forward, the man put his hand to his hat and
said, "Do you want a cab, sir ?" My brother said,
"Yes, I want you to take this lady to Rathgar."
He also asked what was the fare. The cabman said
26. My brother said " Nonsense ;" and the man said
"Will you give ls. 6d., sir ?" and my brother said
yes. Before we came to the cab my brother had
given me ls. 6d., which I held in my ha.nkl. It was
Is. in silver, and 6d. in copper. I continued to hold
the money in my hand afterwards ; the cabman
then opened the door of the cab; I do not know
which way the cab door opened ; my brother put
me in the cab, kissed me and wished me good night.
The man got on the seat and drove away from Nel-
son's Pillar. I did not pay the least attention at
that time to the outside of the cab or the horse. I
remarked that the cabnlan had on a long coat. My
brother came alongside the cab for a short time.
For some time after the cab got into motion nothing
particular attracted my attention. I recollect pass-
ing Portobello-bridge. After I passed that
nothing attracted my attention. The cab stopped
after that without my direction. I cannot re-
member how soon after I passed the bridge the cab
stopped. The cab stopped at the left side of the
way. When the cab stopped the man came to the
window and said that he had dropped his whip, and
should go back for it. He went away and remained
absent five or six minutes. I looked out of the cab
in the meantime. I remarked a high wall at the left
side. There was a lamp at the corner when I looked
back. After that, and before the cabman returned,
a man spoke to me. He came from the direction in
which we were going. He asked me what was the
matter. I told him the cabman had gone away. The
man asked me if I had his number, and I said I had
not. The man looked at the cab and horse, and said
it was a great shame. The cabman came up and
asked the man what he was doing there. The man
said the lady was frightened at being left so long by
herself. The cabman addressed the man, but what
he said I did not hear. He spoke rather in a surly
tone. The cabman turned round and said, " All
right, Miss." The' man went away, and the cab-
man drove off; after that she remarked that the
cabman stood up several times to beat the horse.
I did not know in what direction we were going.
After we had proceeded for some time I remarked
to the cabman that I thought that was not the way
to Rathgar. I opened the front window ;he said
" All right." I asked him if we, would soon be
there, and he made some reply to the effect that we
would be there immediately. Some time after I
spoke to him I observed that the cab proceeded at a
walk. We passed thus slowly a narrow bridge. I
did not then know the bridge. I have since seen the
bridge. I now believe it to be ClaSson's-bridge."
After he passed the bridge ho went a little quicker.
I don't think he went very far from the bridge
when he stopped the cab. He did not stop by my
direction. He stopped at the left side of the road.
She did not observe his beating the horse at any
one place more than another. When he stopped
the cab he got down and opened the door. He
opened the cab next the side where he stopped. I
said, " This is not the place." He replied, " All
right, Miss," and he partly entered the cab and
attempted to kiss me. (At this evidence the pri-
soner smiled.) I jumped up and screamed. He
then seized me by the hair and the front of the
dress, and dragged me out of the cab. I fell on my
back on the ground when I got out. When I was
so lying on the ground he seized me by the throat
with one hand, and put the other on my mouth.
He lased force with the hand on my throat. I was
nearly choked. I screamed as loudly as I could.
The manner in which he kept his hand on my
throat prevented me screaming as loudly as I other-
wise would. I think he was kneeling. He was
stooping over me. I got my feet against him, and
kicked him from me. He immediately returned to
me, and seized me again in the same way. I again
put my feet against him, and pushed him off. He
again returned and seized me in the same way, and
as I was about getting my feet in the same position,
the horse moved.
Up to this time you were still on the ground ?

documents at which I have glanced above were
found in Bourges's portmanteau. A great propor-
tion
of the press has. reported that he has been •
taken and shot, but the truth is, I believe, that he
has fled, and has not been heard of. The brigan-
dage, though much reduced in its proportions, and
for all political purposes destroyed, is still in many
directions very irritating. We hear frequently of
persons' being -carried off and prices put on their
heads;. of the couriers being stopped, passengers
beaten, and letters torn up; of bands in Potenza,
Avellino, and Benevento. Of course, in a country
like this, where no impulse has ever been given to
industry, and where law has ever assumed the form
of a tyrant, and he Who resisted it was respected as
a martyr, there must, be a large amdunt of floating
crime and miserywhich the sword alone cannot put
down. In fact, to send out large bodies of disci.
plined men, with artillery to boot, against mere
cutpurses, seems to be like directing a cannon
against a fly. The soldiers are worn out and
irritated by pursuing an enemy unworthy of them,
and whom they often cannot succeed in ferreting
out. • The best mode of action would be to send
out the Guardia Mobile on the spot, if they could
be depended on, and. hold them responsible for the
tranquillity of the neighbourhood, as was done by
F.
iang
of any
pSairctiilcyul none, indeed, but the inhabi-
tants l
particular locality can know the places
ieari in
where these brigands harbour. I fear, however,
there are more difficulties than are apparent on the
surface in the way of trusting entirely to the Guardia
Mobile, and depots of regular troops will be un-
doubtedly necessary in various places.
During the last week there has been considerable
movement here among the Regulars and Nationals
without one being able to ascertain the real object. ,
As I told you, I think, yesterday, some were of
opinion that fresh landings were apprehended,
others that the band commanded byCipriano, having
been defeated by Pinelli, was flying to the fastnesses
about Vesuvius and S mime. I think, however, that
some coup is intended, and that an effort is to be
made to destroy the bands at once. For this pur-
pose the Piedmontese in Avellino have been rein- •
forced by two battalions of the National Guard, and
an effort will be made to surround Cipriano, who
commands, as I hear, 300 men. A still more neces-
sary work, however, will be to prevent any acces-
sions to the bands by employing and feeding a
hungry population; for, if this be not done, rest
assured that the brigands who roam about the coun-
try, insignificant from their numbers, will have
their ranks increased by all who are hunger-struck.
The address to Garibaldi, begging him to lead
them to Rome, has already received 20,000 signa-
tures in the Neapolitan provinces, and though as
compared with the population the number may ap-
pear small, yet, if we take into consideration that
but a small proportion of the people can write, it is
really very large. This observation would- imply
that crosses have not been received, and I believe
that this is almost strictly the case, there not being
more than 40 or 40 attached. Indeed, the principle
acted upon has been to refuse crosses. ith or
without, however, it makes very little difference,
except for creating a sensation, for no one in
his senses can imagine that the address will be
of any value for practical purposes. Gari-
baldi will not head them, and if he did the sub-
scribers would not follow him while the French
were in occupation. Rome is absolutely necessary
to the South of Italy, and without it there is fear
of confusion and continued agitation, from the want
of centrality in the capital, and from the intrigues
which are being found in Rome, but, unless the
French say the word, Garibaldi will not venture in
so mad a project, nor will those who sign their
names take any other step than that. It is a cheap
and a safe bit of enthusiasm. It has been signed,
however, by many respectable and official persons,
as for instance, by the Provincial Councils of Bene-
vento and Avellino, who have attached their offi-
cial stamp, by the clergy and the Guard of Public

Yes.
When he ran to the horse, what did you do ?
I got up and ran back on the road.
When you say you ran back, was that towards
the bridge which you say you crossed ? Yes.
Did you go far back along the road ?—I don't
think I went very far back upon the road. I en-
deavoured to get into the field,
Was there a wall separating the road from the
field ?—There was a ditch and I tried to get across
it into the field.
Do you mean it was an elevated fence or a ditch ?
—lt was a sunken ditch.
Did you succeed in jumping into the field ?—No,
I did not, but I fell into the trench or ditch.
Was there water in it P—There was ; and I fell
into the water.
Did you light on your feet in the ditch, or did
you fallf—l lighted on my feet, and the water came
up to my waist.
While you were doing this, what was he doing ?
—ln the meantime he got on the cab, and drove up
to the spot where I got into the field.
When he came to the ditch what did he do ?
He stopped the cab, jumped off,
ditch into the field. and leaped over the
When you aw him do this what did you do ?
f 3

7 •

-on- I went higher up in the water, and went further
along; the line of the ditch, continuing in the water.
Security in the latter place •; and it is not to be sa
What did he do then P He came up to where I
dered at when those provinces have suffered se
much from their proximity to Rome. There, tom, was, and seized me by the shoulder.
some of the staff of General Cosenz, who is here' Did you succeed in extricating yourself ?--I ex_
as the head of a Commission of Scrutiny into the
'leafed myself from him, and went still higher up
' t
the
were all this time up to your waist in water. ditch.
la
Guardia Mobile, have also attached their names. in
N,
In short, I believe that it is just as much an enthu-
-Yes.,
siastic admiration for Garibaldi as a desire to pos-
,
Did ti,? follow. you along the field P—He followed,
sess Rome which has given the impulse to the me along the field.
movement. While on this subject I may state, When he came up to where yon were the second
on authority, that Mazzini, so far from encouraging time, did he say- anything to you ?-1-1e desired me
any attempt on the Eternal City, is of opinion that to go back to the cab when he came up the second
it would-be an error. I am given to understand time.
What did you saw to that ?—I refused to do sa,
that his counsels have always tended, in the first •
arid said I would pay .him.
instance, to the capture of Venice, and that he Did you say anything about finding your way
thinks that then Reme would fall of itself.. Such home ?—Yes ; and lie said J could never find my
being the case, he cannot be held responsible for way home, as I was in the " Bloody Fields."
the recent movement in the Sabine territory, and Was anything said about speaking loud P—He
ordered me not to speak so loud.
those well acquainted with him inform me Oat, Was anything done then as to the payment ?
though conscious of what NN as going on, he wrol'e He ordered me to pay him then, and I gave him
to his friends in Naples and the n'rth of Italy to the money.
dissuade them from the project, but without avail. That is the ls. 6d. which you have already de-
It has been remarked as curious that the Govern- scribed P—Yes.
- Dial you place your hand in his when giving him
went which lately watched over and succeeded in
the
in
0. ley ?--No, I dropped it into his hand ,
'I .
with-
capturing the tartana, has never appeared to know his hand.
anything of the landings which have been effected out .ouceng
Did he say anything then?—lle said there was
by the reactionists ; perhaps the reason may be only is. sd. in ,it.
that while the movements of the party of action Had he countad it ?—Yes.
might embroil them with their friend and ally [The prisoner appeared greatly amused at this
the Emperor, the reactionists, even if they landed, portion of the evideLlce-]
What did he do wiih. the money when you gave
were sure of being caught and shot. it to him P—He put the money into his pocket, an .d
he then desired me again to come back to the cab.
Did you assent or refuse ?-1 refused at first, but
then I considered it bettec not to refuse, but lead
him to imagine that I was going back to the cab.
What did he do when you consented to go back
to the cab ?--a-I told him to go back to the cab, and
said I would follow him.
Did he say anything about not doing anthing to
you if yGu went back to the cab P He swore th at
he would not lay a finger on me if I went back to
the cab.
After you proinised to follow him did he turn.
away and go towards the cab?--Yes.
Did he cross into the road for the purpose P—Yes.
As soon as you found him going away what did
you do ? Did you follow him P—No; when he
went away I iMmediately got out of the ditch, and
ran into the field away from the direction of the

road.
Describe the con: se you took when you ran
away.—l fell into two or three dykes.
Did you run across the field ?—I did, and I was
falling every now and then as I crossed the field.
Did you finally come to a hedge and ditch ?—Yes.
What became of you then ?—I fell into it, and
then scrambled over it.
Did you conceal yourself there ?—Yes, for a few
minutes.
Did you then hear any noise of the cab moving ?
—Yes, while lying concealed in the ditch I heard
the cabl drive away.
After that what did you do, or did you see any-
thing ?—Yes, I saw a lamp.
Did you know it to be a railway lamp at the
time P—No, but :I afterwards discovered it to be a
a lamp on the railway, and I directed my course
towards that through the fields. .
In your progress did you fall into any other ditch ?
—Yes, and that, too, was full of water.
After you got out of that and went into the field
and saw the lamps, did you observe anything else ?
I saw a train pass at the time.
And by that you knew you were near the rail-
way ?—Yes.
After you saw the train pass do you remember
going to the corner of the field P—l do ; and there
was a wall which I endeavoured to get over, but I
did not succeed. . I then went down to a paling at
the end of the wall.
Did you succeed then in getting over the paling?
—Yes ; but before that I fell down a steep place.
Did you fall into water at the bottom of it ?
Yes ; there was water at the bottom of it, into
which I felt again.
Upon scrambling out of that where did you find
yourself ?—On the railway line.
Did you climb up an embankment to get to the
railway line ?—Yes, I scrambled up a steep place,
and found myself on the railway line.
You went along the line, then ?—Yes, until I came
to a wall, and sat down upon it to rest myself; then
I went on to the station-house, where I met the
station-master, who was standing, at the door.
Did you immediately tell him what had occurred ?
—As well as I could.
I believe the station-master was very attentive
to you ?—Yes ; very attentive.
,His family undressed you and put you to bed?
—Yes ; I remained there all night until my brother
came for me next morning.
The Magistrate—The charge against the prisoner
is, that he assaulted her with intent to violate her
person.
.Mr. Barry—Yes. (To the witness)—Miss Jolly,
did he take any indecent liberties with your clothes
or person P—No, he did not.
Were you very much hurt by his treatment ?
Yes, my throat was hurt from the pressure of his
hand, and my dress was torn.
Look round now, and see if you can see here the
Man who committed the assault upon you.
Miss Jolly looked round the court and said—Yes,
I see the man,
Point him out.
Miss Jolly—There. The man is there (pointing
to the prisoner at the bar.) (Sensation.)
The prisoner seemed much alarmed at the distinct
and positive manner in which the young lady iden-
tified him.
Do you entertain any doubt that the prisoner is
the man who assaulted you ?
Miss Jolly—l entertain no doubt ; that is the man.
Miss Jolly was then, cross-examined by Mr. Sid-
ney at considerable le#gth. She was particularly
questioned as to whether she had read or heard de-
scriptions of the place where the outrage was com-
mitted, which could have assisted her memory, but
she adhered to her original testimony, declaring
that she distinctly remembered the prisoner, having
been looking at him while her brother was talking
to him about the fare.
The station-master detailed the circumstances
under which Miss Jolly came to his place, and also
her appearance that night.
Mr. Sidney intimated he would reserve his de-
fence, and the prisoner was then fully committed
for trial st the next commission.
Large crowds collected in the vicinity of the
police-court, and every mark of sympathy was
shown towards the lady who had been subjected to
such inhuman treatment. Miss Jolly is apparently
about 20 years of age, rather slender figure, and of
middle height.

LOVE, MURDER, AND ATTEMPTED SUICIDE.—
The Criminal Tribunal of Prague (Bohemia), has just tried
a young man named Kandler on a charge of murder com-
mitted under the following circumstances. In March, last
year, Kandler, who is the son of a wealthy farmer of Slo-
bec, and about 20 years of age, went to live as an apprentice
with aM. Telkon, a miller of Mingowitz, near Prague. At
the same time Mme. Telkon had in her service a good-
looking young woman named Anna Jak, whose mother,
the widow of a captain of infantry, resided at Prague. An
intimacy shortly sprung up between these two young
persons, and as this connection did not meet with
the approbation of M. and Mme. Telkon, Kandler
was sent back to his family. A clandestine correspondence
was, however, kept up by the young people, who wished to
be married, but the girl's mother would not consent to her
daughter's marrying a peasant, and the young man's friends
were equally averse to his taking a wife without fortune.
Things were in this state on the 23d December last, on the
evening of which day some of M. Telkon's labourers
heard the report of fire-arms in a field near the mill,
and on going to the spot, they found the dead body of
Anna who had been shot through the chest. Almost
immediately after the water -wheel of the mill
nearly stopped, and on examination, it was discovered
that the passage of the water was impeded by a human
body, partly filling the opening of the sluice. It was im-
mediately taken out of the water, and recognised as the
body of Kandler, still quite warm. The use of proper
means soon restored sensibility, and Kandler then
stated that, being unable to overcome the
obstacles to their marriage, he and Anna had
agreed to die together; that he had accordingly first shot
her, and turned another pistol against himself ; but as the
pistol burst hewas only wounded, and ha then immediately
threw himself into the river. The letters which had
passed between the two lovers fully bore out the truth
of this statement, aril also showed that the idea of
suicide had been suggested by'Anna. The Tribunal, how-
ever, after a long deliberation, declared Kandler guilty of
murder, and condemned him to death. The prisoner
im-
mediately gave notice of appeal against this sentence.
Two individuals, the one a mason, the other a
joiner or carpenter, both residenters in West Portsburgh,
formed a copartnery, and commenced building houses
within tho boundaries of the burgh corporation. Ono of
the partners was a freeman, the other not, The corpora-
tion, considering its rights invaded by anon-freeman exer-
cising privileges only accorded to one of their body, brought
t engagedmatters
little. for the
`ghatdefendants.
was
really How
the
curious
an action in the Court of session against the interloper, and
his partner, as aiding and abetting. Mr. John Clerk, then
acnauasde eva
vocae ,wi
ds de
ca esd
in the affair, was the naively droll manner in which the
advocate for the defence opened his pl ad* before the Lord
mg.
Ordinary. "My lord," commenced pleading
in his purest
Doric, at the same time pushing • up his spectacles to his
brow, and hitching his gown over 3.1 •
has thocht naething o't (the action),
shoulders, " I wad
action), had hooses been a
new invention, and my clients been caught ouvertly im-
pingin' on the patent
rights o' the inventors l"—Reminis-
cences of qcotlish a 44 character,

THE CONFESSION OF THE WOOD-

LANDS 111U_RDE.R.

DISCHARGE OF THE PRISONER.
On Saturday the soldier, Joseph Seer, who same
weeks since made a confession. that he was the mur-

derer of Sarah Watts at Frome Woodlands in 1851,
was brought up from Shipton Gaol for further exa-
mination. It being rumoured that the case would
take another extraordinary turn, public interest be-
came revived, and crowds of people awaited the ar-
rival of the prisoner.
The following magistrates were on the bench :
The Earl of Cork and Orrery (chairman), Mr.
Knatchbull, M.P., Dr. Harrisois, Mr. Simkips, Mr.
Dickinson, and Mr. It. Duck*orth. The Chief Con-
stable conducted the case, Mr. Eartram, solicitor,
defending the prisoner.
The prisoner, when brought into court, exhibited
a decidedly improved appearance, having lost that
sullen, absent manner which claaracterised him at
the previous examinations.
Superintendent Deggan said.—l shall to-day be
'able to lay evidence before the bench which will
prove that the prisoner was in India at the time the
murder was committed. I have been able to trace
him from the time he left the F.come Union in 1843
till 1847, when he left for India, and during 1855
and 1856 when he was in the Baltic, and from 1857
when he enlisted into the army, till the time of his
discharge last month. I produce the following letter
from the India-office, which I received in reply to a
communication addressed by me to Sir C. Wood :
" India-office, S.W., Oct. 14, 1861.
" Sir,—l am directed by Secretary Sir C. Wood to inform
you, in reply to your letter dated the 12th inst., that on re-
ference to the records of this office, it appears that a lad,
then of the age of 16 years, named Joseph Seers, was, on
July 19, 1847, bound an apprentice to the East India Com-
pany, to serve in the Indian navy for seven years, and that
he sailed from England in the ship Malabar, and arrived at
Bombay Dec. 20, 1847, and was discharged at that place
July 19, 1854. No particulars as to Joseph Seer's return to
England are known at this office.—l am Sir, your obedient
servant, "J. COSMO MELVILLE.
" Mr. E. Deggan."
In corroboration of that letter I have received the
following from the office of Mr. Green cf Blackwall:
• " Blackwall, Oct. 14.
" Sir,—l am directed by Mr. Richard Green to reply to
your letter of the 12th instant respecting a man named
Joseph Seer, and beg to inform you that a boy of that name,
aged 16 years; 4 feet.ll inches in height, whose mother was
described as a charwoman and living at 2, Gloster-gardens,
near the Great Western Railway, Paddington; was sent out
from the Marine Society, Bishops:gate-street, together with
19 others, by the Hon. East India Company in the ship
Malabar to Bombay. The vessel was commanded by W. H.
Parr, and sailed from Gravesend on the 2d of August, 1'347.
Mr. Horace Fleming was a midshipman at that time on
board the said ship. These boys were to a certain extent
passengers, but expected to be made to work during the
voyage.—l shall be happy to give you any. information in
my power.--I remain, Sir, your obedient servant,
," Mr. E. Deggan." " JAMES FUSSELL.

The Chief Constable said--After that evidence I
mutit ask the bench to discharge the prisoner.
'lr. Bertram said it was his duty to express to
the• police his obligations for their efforts, to trace
the •whereabouts of the prisoner. It was now appa-
rent that he had no share in the crime, and hisbeing
placed in his present position was purely the result
of a ctiseased state of mind. He was clearly insane
when he went to prieon, but, whether owing to
prison diet or the calm and quiet of the gaol, he
was now so far recovered as to be able clearly to
show that he was not in this country in 1851. Mr.
Bartrinu was proceeding to make an application re-
specting the witness Payne, when
The Chairman stopped him. His lordship said
the quimition now for the decision of the bench was
whether or not the prisoner should be discharged.

After some consultation with the other- ma-
gistrates,
Lord Cork addressed the prisoner, commenting on
the folly and wickedness. of his conduct, which had
occasioned so much trouble to the police and to the
bench, and so great an expense to the county.
His Lordship admonished the prisoner not to re.
peat such conduct, and then discharged hini.
Mr. Bertram renewed his application. He said
he was quite aware that there were great difficul-
ties in the way of proving a charge of wilful and
corrupt perjury against Payne, but he thought it
was a duty which he was owing to society,' to the
prisoner, and to his friends, that the man Payne be
prosecuted. He had no doubt speculated on gain-
ing the reward by his story, and there could be no
grosser or more corrupt perjury than he had com-
mitted. If the bench thought fit, he (Mr. Bartram)
would be prepared by that day week to produce fur-
ther testimonT—that of the associate of the prisoner
—that he was in India at thetime of the murder.
Lord Cork said the bench had already resolved on
the course they should pursue. At present they
would not accede to the application, but at a future
time they would be quite willing to go into the
charge.
The proceedings then terminated.

Cg,tfN2 Y MARKETS.

NORWICH-Our. 19.

Wheat to-day was in limited supply. Prices were 2a
higher on all descriptions, with a fair sale. Of barley there
was a fair show, and last Saturday's prices were supported.
Flour is per sack dearer.
White wheat 64s to 66s 1 Red wheat ..... 59s to 62s
Malting barley 38s to 40s 1 Chevalier barley...36s to 37s
New do .. ' 37s to 393 Oats.. 268 to 30s
Flour, 42s 6d to 43s Od per sack from the miller.