The Sun.
London, England, 1861-06-10 00:00:00

THIS DAPS MARKETS.

CORN EXCHANGE.
The leading country markets held on Saturday were very,
moderately supplie i with wheat, yet the trade generally
was in a sluggish state, and prices had a downward ten-
dency. In the value of spring corn no material change took
place. The flour trade was dull.
On the the Continent the transactions in all kinds of
Produce for export have been much restricted, at about
previous rates. In the United States, however, a fair busi-
ness is doing at full prices.

Limited supplies of English produce were received up to
our market last week. The imports from abroad amounted
to 26,301 quarters of wheat, 5,141 barley, 104,335 oats,
90,256 beans, 7,281 peas, 1,503 tares, 17,265 linsoed, 7,020
rapeseed, 6,190 maize, 1.60 sundry, 2,493 sacks, and 27,932
barrels of flour.

The arrivals of English grain to this morning's market
were on a very limited scale, and, for the most part,
the quality of the samples was but middling. Fine
samples were disposed of at prices aboutilequal to those
realised on this day se'nnight ; but all medium and inferior
kinds were a dull inquiry, and the quotations gave way is
to 2s per quarter. _

The show of foreign wheat was large. Generally speak-
ing, prices were fairly supported, but where sales were
pressed is per quarter less money was in most instances
accepted.

Floating cargoes of grain changed hands to a limited
extent, yet there is no material change to notice in their
value.
All kinds of barley moved off slowly. The quotations,
however, although in some instances rather drooping, ruled
about stationary.

_
The transactions in malt were very moderate, at previous
rates.

Owing to the large importations the oat trade was very
dull, and prices declined 6d to is per quarter.
Beans were a slow sale, at last Monday's reduction in
their value.

Peas changed hands heavily, yet prices ruled about
stationary.
Flour was very dull, and American barrels were freely
offered at the late reduction in the quotations—in some in-
stances at rather less money.

CURRENCY PER IMPERIAL iittiusyks.
Wheat—Essex and Kent, red, new
Ditto, old s6s 62s
Ditto, white, new 4OB 60.1
Ditto, old sBs 6Os
Norfolk and Lincoln, red, old 538 61s
Ditto, new
Rye—Old
—8 —s
New 4os 42s
Batley—Grinding 27s 32s
Malting
Malt—Suffolk and Norfolk s2s 68s
Brown
Kingstown and Ware 528 70s
Chevalier 7os 728
Oats —Yorkshire and Lincolnsh., Feeding 2ls 278
Potato
Youghal and Cork, black 2lB 268
Cork, white
Scotch, Feeding 248 288
Beans—Tick
Pigeons
Peas—Grey
Maple
White 458 528
Boilers
Flour—Town-made
Suffolk 39s 44s
Stockton and Norfolk ... 378 418

LA TV INTELLIGENCE—(This Day).

COURT OF EXCHEQUER.

(Before the Lord Chief Baron, and Barons Martin, Bram-
well, and Channell.
TILE CASE OF MR. HATCH.

Mr. M. Chambers, Q.C., rose for the purpose of moving
for a rule of court requiring the Lord Chief Baron to issue
his certificate granting to Mr. Hatch the costs in the case of
Lewis v. Lewis, which was tried before his lordship a short
time ago, and a verdict for 40s, damages was returned in
favour of the plaintiff.

Mr. Baron Martin intimated to the learned 'gentleman
that it was a question to be dealt with by the Lord Chief
Baron rather than by an order of Court.

The Lord Chief Baron referred to the steps that had
already been taken with respect to the cost in the cause
alluded to, and said that during the day he would fully
consider the matter, and to-morrow morning lie would
inform the learned gentleman of his determination.

COURT OF DIVORCE.
(B3fore Sir Cresswell Cresswell.)
STOATE V. STOATS.

In this case the husband petitioned the Court for a dis-
solution of marriage on the ground of his wife's adultery,
to which the respondent entered an appearance, and pleaded
denial, and also recriminated the charges. The case was
heard on the 11th of December, 1860, before the Judge
Ordinary and a common jury, and a verdict was found for
the petitioner on all the issues. The learned Judge pro-
nounced the decree nisi, and the case came on for argument
this morning on the application of Mr. Howard, the re-
spondent's solicitor, to be allowed to show ground why the
decree should not be made absolute.

Dr. Swabey, who appeared for Mr. Howard, said that he
founded his application on affidavit to the effect that the
respondent was not in London in sufficient time to give evi-
dence on them, and that two witnesses who were examined
had since seen the respondent, and stated that they were
mistaken in her identity.

Sir C. Cresswell said that the time had elapsed when it
was competent for the respondent to oppose the decree
being made absolute. It was merely an attempt to obtain
a new trial without having previously complied with the
rules of the court. He would accordingly dismiss the ap.
plication with costs.

(Before a Common Jury.)
POUNSFORD V. POUNSFORD AND BULPIN.
This was a suit instituted by the husband for a dissolu-
tion of marriage on the ground of his wife's adultery with
the co-respondent, who is a farmer residing in the neigh-
bourhood of Bridgewater. The respondent entered an ap-
pearance and denied the charge, but the co-respondent did
not appear.

From the evidence it appeared that the respondent, who
was a native of Wembdon, Somersetshire, became ac-
quainted with the petitioner, who was the daughter of a
highly-respectable gentleman at Melbourne, and they were
married in that town in the year 1856. Some years after-
wards her father died and left her considerable property,
which was settled on her, and they returned to England in
the October of 1656. They took up their residence at East
Wembdon, near Bridgewater, and here they formed the
intimacy of Mr. Bulpin, who had previously been ac-
quainted the petitioner, and was in the habit of calling
frequently, and sometimes taking his meals at their house,
It was alleged that Mr. Bulpin at length succaeded in
seducing the affections of the respondent, who subsequently
eloped with him, and they lived together afterwards. It
further appeared that there were some children issue of
the marriage, but they were deceased.

Several witnesses were called, whose evidence fully aka-
Wished the case, and the jury found a verdict for the peti-
tioner, to the effect that the adultery was committed with
the co-respondents, and awarded £5OO damages.
The Court then pronounced the decree ntsi with costs.

CENTRAL CRIMINAL COURT—(This Day.)

The June Sessions of the Central Criminal Court com-
menced this morning before the Lord Mayor, the Sheriffs,
the Recorder, and other civic authorities.
The calendar contains the names of 105 prisoners for
trial, and although the offences charged are not of
an unusually serious description, yet there is one
indictment for murder, two for manslaughter,
several for embezzlement, and about the usual
number of mint prosecutions. The charge of murder is
made against an Italian organ player for wilfully stabbing
a young man at Richmond. The most important case
amongst those for embezzlement is that against Durden
and Holcroft, who are charged, the former with embezzling
and also in conjunetion with the latter conspiring together
for the purpose of defrauding the Commercial Bank of 60
or £70,000. Amongst the minor charges that which
is expected to create the greatest curiosity is the indictment
preferred against Catherine Wilson, a lady of some stand.
ing in society, who is charged with attempting to pass off
the child of her sister as her own legitimate offspring.

The trial of Durden and ilolcroft will, it is expected,
come on on Wednesday next. The judges who will pre-
side are the Chief Justice of the Common Pleas, Sir W.
Erle, Justice Crompton, and Baron Bramwell.

The early part of the morning was occupied in swearing
inand charging the Grand Jury.

POLICE INTELLIGENCE.--(This Day.)

MARLBOROUGH. STREET.
ALLEGED CAR Box ROBBERY.—Jessie Bowman, a
young girl in the employ of Mr. George Conway, butcher,
of IA, Norfolk-street, Middlesex Hospital, was charged
before Mr. Tyrwhitt on suspicion of stealing from a cash
box the sum of £l9, the property of her master.
The prosecutor said he kept his cash box in:a hole in the
flooring of his parlour, and his children informed him that
the prisoner had been to the box and taken the money out.
The prisoner strongly denied the accusation, and was
admitted to bail on her own rocoguizaze to appear again
next week.