The Sun.
London, England, 1859-05-05 00:00:00

Seven ran.

LATEST BETTING.
DEE STAKES.
sto 2 agst Summerside (taken)
sto 2 agst Rainbow (taken)
3to 1 agst Actaeon (taken)
TWO THOUSAND.
Even Promised Land (taken)
6to 1 agst Nimrod (taken)
12 to 1 agst Crofton (taken)
12 to 1 agst Cynricus (taken)
12 to 1 agst Phantom (taken)
16 to 1 agst Ralpko (taken)
ONE THOUSAND.
Even Ariadne (taken)
THE DERBY.
sto 1 agst Musjid (taken)
6to 1 agst Promised Land (taken)
9to 1 agst Marionette (taken)
25 to 1 agst Reynard (taken)
50 to 1 agst Summerside (taken)
THE OAKS.
4to 1 agst Ariadne (taken)
10 to 1 agst Summerside (taken)
Arrived—Ardour, Macbeth, Production, Yellow Rose,
and White Rose.
Sedbury and Orchehill have gone home.

LAW INTELLIGENCE.-(THIS DAY.)

COURT OF CHANCERY.
(Before the Lord Chancellor.)
APPEAL.-JOLLY V. ARBUTHNOT.

The further hearing of this part-heard appeal was resumed
this morning.

Mr. Browne was heard for the appellant.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Master of the
Rolls The contest is whether a tenancy was created by
the mortgage deed in question or a mortgage security only.
Mr. Palmer, Q.C., is now being heard for the respondent.
(Before Vice-Chancellor Sir William Page Wood.)
CLIVE V. CAREIV.-JUDGMENT.

Under three articles of indenture of equal date (July 21,
1855), entered into by the defendants, Mr. and Mrs. Carew,
on their marriage, certain jewels, and in particular a pearl
necklace of the value of £7OO, and other articles of the value
of £l,OOO, were settled on the lady for life, with remainder
to her first and only son, and the rest of the articles therein
mentioned were settled for her separate use. Then by
another indenture of the same date, she had an interest in
leasehold property consisting of rents, to be paid to her
without the power of anticipation.
The circumstances that occurred were these, and such as
have not hitherto arisen and may not arise in future. This
chattel (pearl necklace) of value, in which the children had
an interest, was first pawned and then sold by her. And
the question raised is, whether the estate settled to her
separate use can be applied so as to make the loss sustaine d
by this breach of trust on her part.

His Honour the Vice-Chancellor observed that she had
a separate estate, for her separate use—that she was, as to
these estates, in the situation of a femme sole; her husband
had no control over her, and she had the property without
the power of anticipation. No matter whether the breach of
trust was committed by a male or female, such separate
and distinct property was liable to make good the loss.
His Honour, on the authority of the decision in "Jackson
v. Hibbart," by Lord Eldon, held that the lady's separate
estate was liable to pay the value of the pearl necklace sold
by her, and directed an inquiry to ascertain the value of the
necklace, and what portion of her separate estate required
to be sold. Costs up to the hearing to be taxed by plaintiff
and defendant, as between solicitor and client, with liberty
to apply.

ROLLS COURT.
(Before the Master of the Rolls.)

MOTION FOR DECREE.-BOUSTEAD V. BROMLEY, SMITH V.
_ _

BROMLEY, BROMLEY V. SMITH.
The further hearing of this part-heard motion was re-
sumed this morning. _ . _

Mr. Schomberg is now being heard for the defendants,
Boustead and others.

QUEEN'S BENCH.

(Before Lord
_Campbell, and Justices Crompton, Coleridge,
and Hill.)
SCULLY V. INGRAM-TUE SADLZIR, ERAUDS.

This morning Mr. Edwin James, Q.C., On the part of
the defendant, Mr. Ingram, appeared in court to show
cause against the rule obtained by Mr. Boviß a short time
ago, calling upon the plaintiff to show cause why the ver-
dict given for the plaintiff, with £3OO damages, should
not be set aside under a new trial granted.
It will be recollected that the action was originally
brought by Mr. Vincent Scully, formerly M.P. for the
county of Cork, against Mr. Herbert Ingram, P. for
Boston, for falsely representing himself as the owner of
tloe estate of Castle Hyde, situate in that county. Mr.
Scully charged him with doing that falsely and fraudu-
lently, and with the view of deceiving him, and said he had
been injured and prejudiced thereby, and been prevented
obtaining the payment of a debt of £9,000 due to him ICom
the late John Sadleir.

Previous to the commencement of the arguments Lord
Campbell proceeded to read his notes of the evidence taken
at the trial, which occupied the court up to a late hour in

the afternoon.

The case is expected to occupy the court the whole of

to-morrow.

POLICE INTELLIGENCE.-(THIS .DAY.)

MANSION-HOUSE.

A NEW LAW OF EJECTMENT.—WiIIiam Curle, a re-
spectable-looking middle-aged man, was charged with
annoying the neighbourhood of Hand-and-Pen-court, in
which place he resides.

Prisoner's landlord said that Curie occupied a furnished
room in his house. He was the terror of the court, and
threatened to set his room on fire.

The Lord Mayor bound the prisoner over to keep the
peace, and said that if he would leave the apartment to-day
no further steps would be taken.

The prisoner demurred to this somewhat peremptory
notice, but was ultimately induced to agree to the terms.

COMMITTAL OP A DARING AND NOTORIOUS SMASHER.

—John Coleman, a well-dressed man, aged 40, who re-
fused his address, was charged with uttering counterfeit
coin.

John Tany, warehouseman to Mr. Barclay, stationer,
of Bucklersbury, said that on the 27th April last, the
prisoner came to the shop and purchased 36 receipt stamps,
paying for the same with a bad half-crown and a sixpence.
The sixpence was good, but witness did not discover that
the half-crown was counterfeit until the prisoner had left
the shop. Yesterday prisoner again visited the shop and
purchased 36 receipt stamps, tendering a second time a
counterfeit half-crown and a sixpence. On this occasion
witness bent the half-crown in prisoner's presence, and
mentioned the circumstance of the first counterfeit. Pri-
soner gave witness a good half-crown and left the shop.
He was, however, soon brought back in custody of police-
constable, 418. He refused to give a name or address.
A witness named Clegg, in the same employment as the
first witness, said that the prisoner passed a counterfeit
florin at prosecutor's shop on the 30th of April.
The prisoner declined to examine any of the witnesses,
and the Mint solicitor, who attended on behalf of the autho-
rities, asked for his committal.
The officer said he found all good money on the prisoner.
Mr. Martin (chief clerk) said the prisoner would not be
committed this time for misdemeanour, but for felony, and
the former convictions would be proved against him.
The prisoner was then formally committed for trial.
A JEWISH WOMAN BEATER.—Edward Levy, who was
placed in front of the dock, was charged, on a summons,
with assaulting a woman named Page. The defendant,
whose youthful appearance astonished the Lord Mayor,
was about seven years of age.

Plaintiff averred that he was very saucy, and struck her
two blows in the eye.
Defendant's mother attended and attempted to justify the
assault but the Lord Mayor bound her over, on behalf of
her son, to keep the peace.