The Sun.
London, England, 1859-02-11 00:00:00

THE SUN, LONDON, FRIDAY EVENING, FEBRUARY 11, 1859.

said he changed the note in question for Hatton,
who wrote his name upon it at the time.

Edward Dowell, a very intelligent boy, about 12
years of age, who gave his evidence in a remark-
ably clear manner, said—l met Casseldine on the
day of this robbery at the top of Baldwin's-gardens,
and went with her to Field-lane, to steal a pair of
boots. _

Alderman Challis—Did she say she was going
to steal a pair of boots.
Witness—Yes, sir. She said," Come along ; they
are going to get me a pair of boots." Ford then
joined us, and we then went to the Seven-dials,
where she bought a
.pair of boots for sd. We then
returned to Baldwin's-gardens and I went into
the skittle ground belonging to Hatton's house, and
they went into the house. When they came out
they said they had picked a lady's pocket of a
pocketbook and a key. This was in the middle of
the day on Tuesday, the Ist of this month. They
then went into the skittle ground and stayed there
until between 5 and 6 o'clock, when Walsh came
in, and we all went to Fleet-street. Casseldine left
us for a short time, and went away with a gentle-
man, and when she returned she said " Let us go
stoop-buzzing."
Alderman Challis—What did she mean by stoop-
buzzing ?
Tyler explained that it was a practice with fe-
males of robbing gentlemen who fell into their
company under peculiar circumstances.
Witness—While we were in Fleet-street I saw
a gentleman lookinc, in at a shop-window. Ford
took out his silk handkerchief,b and when he re-
turned to us he said he had a purse. He produced
a pocket-book, which he said he got from the gen-
tleman's pocket, and gave it to Walsh, who handed
it to Casseldine. We then went further up Fleet-
street, and Walsh took the pocket-book again and
opened it, and took out the £5 note. He called
Casseldine's attention to it, and the water mark
upon it. We returned to Baldwin's-gardens, where
Walsh took the notes out and gave the pocket-
book to Casseldine. They then went into Jesse
Hatton's house, and, after Walsh had examined
all the other papers which were in the pocket-
book, Ford and Casseldine threw them away in
the water-closet ; Casseldine, after that, gave the
£5 note to Jesse Hatton.

Alderman Challis—How do you know that ?

Witness—Because I saw Hatton come to the
foot of the stairs with the £5 note in his hand. He
remained there a short time, after which he went
up stairs with the prisoners, and they told a big
boy there to keep me from going up after them.
The big boy went into the water-closet and brought
out some of the papers, which he read, and said one
was a cheque for £4O. He burnt them all in the
gas-light. When the prisoners came down Cassel-
dine gave me 2s. and said she had sold the £5 note
to Jesse Hatton, but that she only got 7s. for it,
because it was a bad one. We then went to the
theatre, and they said if I went with them I must
pay for myself. Before they left Baldwin's-gardens
Hatton asked them what they were going to stand,
and they then ordered some gin, but they left before
it was brought in. I did not go home that night,
but went to a lodging in Fulwood's-rents, which
Ford and Casseldine took me to.

Walsh—He said the other day we sold the note
for £3 10s., and now he says it was 7s.
Witness—They told me they only got 75., but
when they left Hatton's house the big boy called
me a little fool, and said they got £3 10s. for the
note.

Ford—He at first said the girl stole the pocket
book, and now he says I did it.
Witness—l never said the girl took it.

Casseldine—lt is all false what he has sworn to.
He says he never saw me before the Tuesday, when
he knows he saw me on the Sunday before.
Witness—l did not see you on Sunday, as I was
at school.
Casseldine—Why, you have only just come out
of prison. He has only come up against us now,
Sir, because we would not give him a new pair of
trousers.

Alderman Challis—He has given his evidence
remarkably well.
Police-constable 165 G said—l know all the pri-
soners, and saw them together on the day in ques-
tion. I have seen them all in Hatton's house re-
peatedly at different times, but on this occasion
they were together. I am on duty in Baldwin's-
gardens, and know Hatton's house well. I have
seen many other thieves frequently there. There
is a skittle-ground there, and I saw the witness
Dowell there on the same day with the prisoners.
Tyler—l met Hatton yesterday, and he asked
me if I had found out the "bloke" yet, meaning
the owner of the pocket-book. I said I had, and
he then said, " How do you think we shall get
on ?" I said I did not know, but that the boy
Dowell had sworn he (Hatton) had the pocket-
book, postage stamps, and £5 note. He said it was
all a lie, for he never saw either of the prisoners or
the boy there on that day.
Alderman Challis—l think Hatton must now be
given into custody, for I shall certainly send him
for trial with the other prisoners.
Mr. Lewis, jun., who was in attendance watching
the case for Hatton, said—Hatton is here, sir, and
is prepared to give evidence. The whole matter
rests upon the evidence of a little thief, and I am
sure, sir, you will hesitate in ordering a respectable
tradesman into custody upon the unsupported testi-
mony of a thief.

Alderman Challis—l have felt all along that
that was the only course open to me, and I think
it only fair to Hatton to place him in a position
where he may be able to defend himself.

Mr. Lewis:—Whoever orders him into custody
will of course take the responsibility of such a pro-
ceeding. _

Alderman Challis—Oh, certainly. Let Hatton
go into the dock at once.
Hatton was accordingly placed at the bar with
the other prisoners.

The boy- Dowell was then recalled, and on being
cross-examined by Mr. Lewis, said—l joined the
prisoners for the purpose of thieving. I have been
in the habit of going out thieving for the last three
months. I was taken once for stealing a waistcoat,
about a month ago, and had 14 days for it, from
Marylebone Police-court.
Alderman Challis—,you have given your evidence,
as I understand it, very clearly indeed, but whether
it is true or false it is not for me to determine.

Witness (crying)—After leaving here, sir, the
last time, three of the prisoners' friends threatened
to stab me.

Alderman Challis—You need not be afraid; they
will not do anything of the kind.
Mr. Lewis made a very energetic appeal on
behalf of Hatton, urging that there was not the
slightest corroboration of the thief's story.
Alderman Challis—l cannot agree with you there,
and I assure you, if I were on the jury trying him,
I would find him guilty on the evidence before me
as it stands. I will take bail for him.
Mr. Lewis--I suppose his own recognisances will
be sufficient. _

Alderman Challis—Oh, dear, certainly not. His
own recognisance in £lOO, and two sureties in £5O
each.

The prisoners were then remanded for the at•
endance of the owner of the property.

LAMBETH.—SQUABBLES AMONGST FIREMEN.
—Mr. Elliott was engaged for upwards of an hour
in investigating a charge of assault preferred by
Frederick George Newing, a fireman belonging to
the Brigade, against Thomas Whitaker, the fore-
man to the private fire brigade of Mr. Hodges, the
distiller, and in whose charge a powerful engine
belonging to Mr. Hodges is placed.
Mr. Giffard, the barrister, instructed by Mr.
Humphreys, jun., appeared in support of the com-
plaint; and Mr. Solomon attended for the defence.
Mr. Braidwood, the superintendent, and Messrs.
Henderson and Holloway, the engineers to the Firs
Brigade, were also present to watch the proceedings.
It appeared that for some time past a misunder-
standing has existed between the brigade men and
those belonging to the private engine belonging to
Mr. Hodges, arising in a great measure from the
hasty temper and dictatorial manner of the foreman
belonging to the latter. Some weeks ago the de-
fendant Whitaker had been summoned to this
court, and was convicted in a penalty, for assault-
ing a policeman at a fire, and on that occasion he
was shown to have acted with a want of temper.
The cause for the present complaint arose on the
26th, at a fire that took place in the house of Mr.
Silver, a baker, at Kennington-cross. The complain-
ant was the first to arrive at the fire, and having,
with the assistance of otherS, thrown several buckets
of water on the fire, managed to confine it to one
room, and was on his hands and knees looking for
the cause or source of the fire, when the defendant,
who had brought his engine, rushed upstairs. On
seeing him, the defendant, addressing him, said,
" Get out; of the way, you fire-escape man; what
can you know about putting out a fire?" The com-
plainant replied that he belonged to the brigade,
and to the Waterloo-station, and exhibited his
number, 90 ; upon which he said he only belonged
to the brigade a few days caught him by the collar,
and pushed him out of his way.
In his cross-examination the complainant ad-
mitted that he was not much hurt, and that it was
the indignity of being treated so that he thought
most of. He also admitted that the defendant
brought with him a hand-pump, an instrument '
generally used by firemen in putting out slight fires
in rooms ; and Mr. Holloway, who was called as a
witness, admitted that this pump had been used to
extinguish the remaining fire in the room.
Mr. Giffard, in his address to the magistrate,
assured the Bench that there was not the slightest'
feeling of vindictiveness on the part of Mr. Braid
wood, the Auperintendent or the brig[glet or the

officers acting under him, towards the defendant ;
and all they wanted was the proper and necessary
protection to the men in their charge from insult
and violence, such as that sworn to, while in the
execution of their necessary and important duties.
Mr. Solomon characterised the complaint as one
arising purely from motives of jealousy on the part
of the Fire Brigade towards the servants of Mr.
Hodges for their humane interference in the pro-
tection of property, while their right to do so was
as undoubted as that of the Brigade men them-
selves. The learned gentleman also drew the
attention of the magistrate to the extraordinary
discrepancy of the three witnesses called re-
specting the alleged assault. The complainant
himself said that the defendant caught him by
the collar and raised him from the ground, while
the police inspector said he pushed him out of
his way, and a third witness said he pushed against
him in a disrespectful manner. He (Mr. Solomon)
concluded by assuring the magistrate that his client
denied having used the slightest degree of violence.
Mr. Elliott observed that there could be no doubt
it was very kind on the part of Mr. Hodges to keep
an engine to assist in extinguishing fires, and that
his servants had a right to attend at fires, but at
the same time the engine should be placed under
the control and management of a discreet and pro-
per person, and not one giving way to such
temper as that indulged in by the defendant. His
conduct on the present occasion was most improper,
and for the assault complained of he must pay a
penalty of 405., or 20 days.
The penalty was paid.
Mr. Giffard assured the magistrate that in all
other parts of the metropolis the Brigade men were
on the best possible terms with the attendants on
private engines.

SOUTHWARK.—EXTENSIVE ROBBERY OF VA-
LUABLE MEERSCHAUM PIPES FROM THE JOHN
BULL STEAMER.—Thomas Preston M'Carthy, de-
scribed as a wholesale tobacconist, of Royal Mint-
street, Tower-hill, and 24, Bear-lane, City, and
John Summers, a tobacconist, carrying on business
at 20, Weston-street, Southwark, were brought
before Mr. Combe, charged with being concerned
with another in custody, in stealing 35 valuable
meerschaum pipes, from a case on board the John
Bull, Hamburg steamer, the property of Messrs.
Woolf and Co., Sambrook-court, Basinghall-street,
City.
Mr. Lewis, sen., appeared for the prosecution,
and in opening the case against the prisoners, said
that on the 17th Dec. last the John Bull arrived in
the port of London, on board of which was con-
signed a case of valuable meerschaums from Vienna
to Messrs". Woolf and Co. It was delivered on the
following day, when 35 pipes were missed. On the
21st Jan. one of the stolen pipes was traced to the
possession of Henry Hinds, a Customs waterman,
who was taken into- custody and remanded for
further evidence. He should now be able to
show that the prisoners at the bar had possession
of most of those pipes, and on a further investi-
gation, no doubt circumstances would be brought
to light exposing an extensive system of robbery
and smuggling entered into by certain parties hold-
in a respectable position.
g 'Wm. Jarvis, a City detective, said—From infor-
mation he received from the prisoner Summers, who
was at the Seething-lane police-station, he went
with Hughes, an officer of the M division, to Royal
Mint-street, Tower•hill, on the previous evening,
where he met M'Carthy, and asked him to accom-
pany him to the station house in Seething-lane to
be identified, or to identify another man who was
there. He consented, and as soon as they entered
the station house Summers called out," That is the
man I had the pipes from," at the same time point-
ing out M'Carthy. The latter denied his assertion,
at the same time calling Summers a vagabond.
Witness then took M'Carthy into custody as well
as Summers, and brought them to this court. When
M'Carthy was charged he said he did not steal the
pipes ; he bought them in the usual way as smug-
gled goods, and a Customs officer who was in cus-
tody stole them and brought them on shore. He
also made a communication to witness which he did
not wish to make public, as it might defeat the ends
of justice. M'Carthy refused to give his address,
but witness knowing it, went to 24 Bear-lane, City,
and having searched it he found a large quantity of
foreign tobacco, snuff, cigars, gloves, Berlin-wool,
and two formidable-looking life-preservers.
M'Carthy said he kept them for his own protec-
tion.

Mr. Lewis here asked his worship to discharge
Summers, and allow him to be made a witness.
Summers was liberated and put in the witness
box. On being sworn, he said he kept a tobacco-
nist's shop, at 20, Weston-street, Southwark. He
had known M'Carthy for six or seven years. He
saw the pipes produced on the 20th Dec., when he
lived in Marble-court, Bermondsey. On that
day M'Carthy brought three to him as a sample,
when he said he had a number of them at home,
and asked witness if he could sell them for him.
He said he required Bs. 6d. for each of the claws,
and 7s. 6d. for each of the plain ones. Witness
told him to leave them, and he would see what he
could do with them, as he was in the habit of soli-
citing orders from shops. He left the three samples,
and on the following day
,he saw M'Carthy again,
and told him he had been •a tradesman in Picca-
dilly who would give an order for some, but before
he did so he wanted to see some of the others.
M'Carthy then gave him 12 more, making in all 15
pipes. Witness took them to Mr. Simmons's, at 62,
Piccadilly, and sold him the 10 now produced for
£4 ss. at the rate of Bs. 6d. each, and received the
money. Witness saw M'Carthy at his own house
the same night, and handed him £3 195., leaving
him 6s. for his trouble. The five remaining pipes
witness sent to him on the following day by his
errand boy.
Mr. Combe asked when all this occurred.
Mr. Lewis replied, on the 19th and 20th of De-
cember—about the time the pipes were stolen.
Summers here said that previous to M'Carthy
bringing him the samples, he called on him and
asked him to wait on him and look at some
smuggled meerschaum pipes. Witness knew him
as a tobacconist, and dealer in smuggled goods.
M'Carthy acknowledged selling the pipes, but he
bought them in the regular way. He denied having
said that they had been stolen by a Customs man,
now in custody, and that he brought them to him.
That was all false.

Jarvis said that was his statement at the Seeth-
ing-lane police station.
Mr. Combe asked whether the pipes now pro-
duced had been identified as those stolen from the
case in question. _

Jarvis replied that they had.
Mr. Lewis here informed his worship that Hinds,
the Customs officer, who stood charged with being
concerned in the robbery, would come up for fur-
ther examination on Saturday, the 19th instant,
therefore he asked his worship to remand the pri-
soner M'Carthy until that day.
Mr. Combo accordingly remanded him and re-
fused to accept bail.'

WORSHIP-STREET.—RECOVERY OF STOLEN
PROPERTY.—John Lee, 26, a thick-set man, de-
scribing himself as a potato dealer, was charged
before Mr. Hammill as follows :

Deeble, a detective officer, H division, in conse-
quence of certain information went on the 3d inst.,
early in the morning, to the prisoner's shop, in
Baker's-row, Whitechapel, and passing through a
passage to a room at the rear, found it locked. He
returned, and accosting the prisoner's wife in the
front apartment, demanded the key. She opened
the door of the room in question immediately, and
he there perceived a quantity of property which he
knew to have been stolen. The prisoner himself
admitted that he was landlord of the whole pre-
mises and answerable for the contents. The officer
pointed out a quantity of cotton print, beads, furs,
and brushes in the room, respecting which he gave
evasive accounts as to how they came there, and he
was, together, with the property, removed to the
station.

Mr. Simon Isaacs, a furrier, in Middlesex-street,
Whitechapel, claimed the skins, 219 in number, as
portion of a burglary committed on his premises,
between the 7th and Bth of January last, and valued
at £35.

Mr. Moses Levin, bead merchant, of Bevis-marks,
said that on the 25th of November last he received
12 cases and 25 barrels of beads from Liverpool,
invoiced to him from Venice, and intended for the
African market. Between that date and the 30th
of the same month one case of the goods was stolen
from his warehouse. Those produced corresponded
in quantity, weight, and description with the
contents of that case.
Mr. Beard, of Basinghall-street, here elicited that
witness had not seen the contents of the package,
and therefore urged that there was not evidence of
beads any more than buttons having been stolen.
Mr. Hammill thought that fact fatal, but ordered
the prisoner for trial, Mr. Beard reserving his
defence. _ _ _

It was stated that the prisoner had been several
times convicted.

WESTMINSTER.—DISTURBANCE AT AN ORA-
TORY.—EIiza Macdonald, a very respectable look-
ing young woman, 26 years of age, who described
herself as a servant, surrendered to her bail for final
examination, charged with assaulting John Joseph
Munce, porter at the Brompton Oratory,
It appeared from the statement of complainant
that at half-past five on the evening of the 28th
ult. he was told by the priest to turn defendant out,
as she had been annoying him during the day.
Witness proceeded to eject her, when she became
very violent, and scratched his face, insisting upon
remaining in, t►he plea. There was no oervice at the

time, but persons went in and out all day for their
private devotions. When he got her outside she
created a great disturbance, and collected a mob of
persons,
Police-constable Patrick Leonard proved appre-
hending her. She was outside the Oratory, with a
large mob round her, very violent, andattempted to
scratch the porter's face, but witness prevented her.

Defendant's answer to the charge was that she
had done nothing to be turned out for. She had
gone there to confession, and the priest ordered her
to be turned out, when the porter tore the hooks off
her mantle and pushed her down outside the Oratory.

Mr. Arnold said there was no doubt something
behind which had not transpired, but he would not
inquire into that. All he had to deal with was the
charge before him, and defendant's conduct on the
whole appeared to be extremely- improper, obtrud-
ing herself, as she had, into a place of worship and
annoying those assembled, for although no service
was actually going on at the time, still persons
were in the habit of entering the Oratory all day
and must have been much inconvenienced by the
disturbance she had occasioned in resisting the
porter, and trying to force her way into one of
the confessionals. The assault, however, was
no doubt committed in her endeavours to force
her way in, and it would, therefore, be suffi-
cient for her to find bail to keep the peace for six
months.
Defendant's former master appeared in the course
of the afternoon, and readily undertook to be surety
for her to the required amount.

CHARGE OF ENDEAVOURING TO DEFRAUD THE
PARISH.—EIiza Johnson was finally examined,
charged under the Poor Law, Amendment Act, 5
Geo. IV., cap. 83, with making a false statement at
St. Margaret's and St. John's Workhouse, West-
minster.

About a fortnight since the police discovered
defendant at one in the morning in the neighbour-
hood of the workhouse, and as she appeared to be
in great suffering and said she was in the pains of
labour, she was conveyed to the workhouse, and
there told the porter she was in labour, and was so
ill that she could not stand. She had been seen
about that evening very drunk, but the porter
fearing that serions consequences might result if she
were turned away, had the nurse woke up. Defen-
dant repeated her statement to her, and was taken
to the lying-in ward, where the nurse discovered
that she had told an untruth, and that there was
every reason to suppose that she was not even
pregnant. Before the magistrate she denied that
she had made a false representation, and Mr. Whit-
marsh, assistant to Mr. George Pearse, Regent-
street, Westminster, was sent for, and gave it as
his opinion that the nurse had come to a right con-
clusion. Subsequently, it was discovered that an
old lady in the almshouses had lent her a shawl
which she had illegally pawned, and it was stated
other cases could }be brought forward against her,
in addition to which Mr. Arnold received a letter
from a gentleman in the City from -which there was
every reason to believe defendant was the woman
who made a similar statement to the gentleman a
short time since.

Yesterday the gentleman spoken of attended, but
found, although the description of defendant was
similar to the woman he had written of, they were
two separate persons.
The additional charge was then proceeded with,
but as the prosecutrix in it had been in the habit
of allowing defendant to pawn things, Mr. Arnold
was of opinion that the accused might have con-
sidered she had an implied authority to pledge the
article she had disposed of, and therefore could not
entertain the charge. In the shawl case, as the
pawning had taken place more than six months
ago, Mr. Arnold had no jurisdiction, and defendant
therefore had only to answer the first charge.
The accused said she had been led from natural
causes to suppose that what she represented was
true, as she had suffered very much. But a short
time since she had an offer to go abroad but refused
it, supposing she was in the family way.
Mr. Arnold thought it strange that a woman of
36 years of age should make such a mistake, when
the medical testimony went to show that she was
not even pregnant.
In answer to inquiries from the magistrate, the
nurse at the workhouse said defendant, when ad-
mitted, might have been in pain, although witness
was of opinion she had feigned illness. Witness
would not like to swear defendant was not suffering
at the time. _ _

Mr. Arnold sent for Mr. Whitmarsh, and after a
private conversation with that gentleman, said,
from what he had heard, it was just possible that
the defendant might have been led to suppose she
was in the pains of labour. He (the worthy
magistrate) did not think she had been herself de-
ceived, but still he must give her the benefit of the
doubt. He should not, therefore, convict her, and
she was discharged.
Defendant left the court, seemingly very much
surprised at not having been sent to prison.

WANDSWORTH.—SEIZURE OF AN ILLICIT
STILL.—H. Clifton, a young man about 30 years of
age, who was stated to have moved in very good
circumstances, was placed in the dock before Mr.
Dayman, charged with working a private still,
whereby the revenue was defrauded to a consider-
able amount.

Mr. John Vanstone, a supervisor of Excise,
deposed that about twelve o'clock on Wednesday at
noon he went, accompanied by Mr. Leigh and two
other detective officers of Inland Revenue, to a house
having no number in Montgomery-road, Merton.
He knocked at the door at the end of the lane, but
could gain no admittance. Mr. Leigh knocked at
the side door and was admitted. Witness followed
in and saw the prisoner in custody. He was- taken
into a front room, and witness went into the yard,
where he saw a washhouse. Upon entering that
building, which was attached to the house, he dis-
covered a very large copper still, containing about
40 gallons, with a fire underneath, and it was
distilling spirits. He also saw several tubs contain-
ing about 150 gallons of molasses wash in a state
of fermentation. He further found a quantity of
molasses and about 20 gallons of illicit spirits.
This spirit was liable to a duty of Bs. per gallon.
He returned to the house, and asked the prisoner if
there were any persons there, and he replied in the
negative, with the exception of his wife and five
children, and that the still was his own. He also
said that he had been out of work for some time,
and that distress compelled him to adopt that course
to obtain a living for his family. Witness was sorry
to find the prisoner in this position, as he believed
he had formerly been in better circumstances.
Mr. Dayman inquired the cost of the plant for
the still.

The witness said he had no doubt it cos.
about £lO.

Mr. Dayman asked the prisoner what he had
to say.
The prisoner, who held his head down, replied,
"Nothing."
Mr. Dayman said he had no discretion in miti-
gating the penalty. He therefore fined the prisoner
£3O, or three months' imprisonment with hard
labour.
The prisoner was then locked up.

[ADVERTISEMENT.]—ThorIey's Food for Cattle is now
beginning to seriously attract the attention of the farmer,
• breeder, and feeder of stock. Two years of unremitting
care and attention have enabled its inventor to take high
ground as a benefactor to these interests ; and notwithstand-
ing the many drawbacks, the malevolent shafts hurled
against it and its probable utility, the food, from its admitted
value, will become a necessity to the agricultural interest.
Experience has proved, first, that it affects a considerable
saving in the consumption of provender; secondly, that it
produces health and vigour in all animals subjected to its
influence : and lastly, increases in a remarkable degree an
early development of fat. Mr. Thorley, originating this
singularly efficacious food, aimed at a compound calculated
to supersede, to a certain extent, the tedious and expensive
mode then prevailing of fattening stall-fed beasts. In this
he happily succeeded. ; and success prompted a very natural
desire to improve upon the invention, so as to make it ap-
plicable to every description of domestic animal. The Eng-
lish farmer was slow to encourage its use, and manifested an
unwillingness to rely upon its efficacy, fancying he possessed
in the produce of his farm, ample materials whereby to feed
and fatten his cattle at a cheaper rate than by the employment
or addition of artificial food. The tests to which this food has
been subjected haveproved its perfect admissibility as a cheap
addition to the natural produce of the farm ; inasmuch as in
all cases a subtraction of one-third may be safely submitted
to in the usual food of animals ; and that the produse will be
realised, and rendered marketable in two-thirds of the time
usually consumed in developing fat ; it, therefore, becomes
apparent that a certain saving is effected by a fair application
of Thorley's Compounded Food. It is believed that the present
unprecedented low price of wheat has induced its very gene-
ral use, in preference to any other of the usual articles of
food ; it is, however, much questioned whether wheat is a
nourishing and proper food for the working horse, certainly
it is not for cows or pigs. Mr. Thorley's Food, besides
possessing the advantage of greatly invigorating the health
and increasing the physical power of all animals, is a tonic
and gentle stimulant, and when mixed with - their other
food, materially assists their digestive powers—a matter of
groat consequence, since it is an undoubted fact? that the
nourishment contained in their ordinary food . lost, conse-
quent upon the impaired or defective action of the digestive
organs ; it will also be found to be particularly beneficial
in restoring to good working condition horses which have
been over-worked, or become weak from disease, or are
naturally of a feeble constitution. In cows its effects are
undoubted, indeed almost marvellous, nearly doubling the
yield of milk and butter, whilst it at the same time enriches
the quality of both. In pigs its fattening qualities are still
.
more remarkable, displaying a few weeks its manifest
superiority over every
i other kind of compound or manu-
factured food adopted n the feeding of swine. Such has
been its marked success, that at all our great cattle shows,
Royalty, noblemen, and nthers who have fed their cattle
on Thorley's Food, have invariably carried off the principal
prizes, whilst cards of commendation have been awarded.
The patronage of Royalty, of our principal nobility, the
clergy, and of our leading agriculturists, must prove a
great incitement to this gentleman to pursue his onward
course; and he may confidently rely, in producing so
highly-favoured a compound, on a continuation of such
hig4 and distinguished ptitrenage.

SPURTING INTELLIG EX CE.