The Sun.
London, England, 1835-08-13 00:00:00

M \I LS

Arrivee„ Due. Arrived. Dini Arrived, 1)1:
0 America 0 1 France 0 0 Lisbon 0
0 Braz,l
0 Pumios A yre,!... 0 0 11,~,,,,i,•
n Casthigena 0 0 Fiii,, d
1 Dublin OI II Jainu'ca
1 Hamlet's ...... .. 0 0 Leeward Islani4s 0 1 W3r,rf.:rii, 0

01611 NN ATint it I (7-MOlt!it.llA.
Mot-nit-1v tnintites after 5. I r.venin.....18 rnirome., atter 5

HA-minute, Acct ST 7, 16.,.5.
NOTICE is hereby given, tbnr t! ,e Tickets of tiv,
66th HAMBURG GREAT I OTT ERN:, glr.trantee,ll,.,
the Hamburg State, that begins arawing 12tb zir.,ll3th inst.:
ARE NEARLY ALL CLEARED OFF ;
and that Tickets warranted undrawn, selling between the 1411 ar.•
2Sth inst. at 101. will not be on sale between the 31st inst. at,'
V, September (on which latter day the Largest Capital Prize is 10
be drawn), below 151.
The undersigned Contractors decline, as usual, to take am
English orders for any thing lets than a whole Ticket, the Coi.i es-
Rondenee for single shares being too troublesome, and not worth

the postages.
Persons remitting 101. without delay, will receive an immediate
answer by return of Post ; but those who would not feel pleased t
receive back their remittance (as coming altogether too late, ui•
after an advance in price), must lose no
HtiElNEme in remßßOTHEßSitting 10/.

Direct, Heine Brothers, in Hamburg.
P.S.—ln the last (66th) Lottery, the Capital Prizes came up to
the following Tickets•.—

Bancomarks
. 100,000
. 50,000
. 30,000

No. 2,328 sold in Hamburg
3,277 sold to Limerick
5,427 sold to Riga
1,620 sold in Hamburg for account of a London
house .. 20,000
3,451 sold to Liverpool
The Prizes of the Hamburg Great Lottery, are since the last
Lottery payable without any deduction whatever, and at the present
Exchange Bancomarcs 55 are equal to 41.

do
The publication o, THE SUN NEWSPAPER commenced. this
at N minutes past 3 o'clock.

LONDON,
THURSDAY EVENING, AUGUST 13, 1836.

Though the House of Lords have at length agreed
to go into Committee on the Corporation Reform
Bill, yet the people must not permit themselves to be
duped by such an apparent show of conciliation. It
is merely a change of hostile tactics ; nothing more.
Their Lordships are just as eager to defeat the Bill as
ever ; not one atom of their prejudices against it have
they given up ; but having at length acquired some-
thing like a discreet insight into consequences, they
have preferred to fall on it in the rear, instead of in
the front ; to play the part of the fox, rather than that
of the lion ; and content themselves with craftily mu-
tilating, what they feel they have not the strength or
courage openly to destroy. Though the measure has
advanced a stage, yet it is still in as much peril as
ever. It has merely entered the forest, and if the
people do not stick close to its side at every
step, it will infallibly be torn in pieces by the
fierce animals who infest the jungles. There is
NEWCASTLE already crouching, previous to his fatal
spring on it. WELLINGTON has set up his roar; and
MANSFIELD is prepared to strangle it in his em-
braces. We must therefore still keep on the alert—
have all our wits about us—light up our watch-fires—
avoid straggling—and move and act in concert to-
gether. Forewarned is forearmed ; and last night's
debate is a hint, the tendency of which we cannot pos-
sibly misapprehend. Our duty, then is to turn it to
account, by husbanding our resources for the crisis of
which it is the significant forerunner. True, there is
a split among our opponents, and division implies
weakness ; but we must not trust to this. Though the
NEWCASTLE differs from the WELLINGTON party,
yet it is only on a trifling question of degree. Both,
in the main, are equally hostile to the Bill, and both
will use every effort to neutralize it. WELLINGTON'S
endeavour to emasculate it, is quite as much to be
guarded against as NEWCASTLE'S anxiety to tear it
to atoms, and scatter it to the four winds of heaven.
How indeed can we expect that a measure will pass
safely through Committee, when even its most tempe-
rate opponent, plainly tells us, that he objects to its
principle, " first, because it does not adequately se-
cure existing rights and privileges ; secondly, because
it does not secure the rights of individuals appointed
for the term of their lives to situations under the exist-
ing charters ; thirdly, because it does not secure the
Envileges granted to freemen under existing Acts of
Parliament ; and lastly, because it tends to the esta-
blishment of a syt.4_llll by which persons may be elected
to high and important mull;c! situations, who have
no adequate qualifications for such a trust ?" If this
p.!ti

'•;1, •
--acCftliV •
'ft

bt*