The Sun.
London, England, 1835-10-02 00:00:00

THE REGISTRATION.--(THIS DAV;

CITY OF LONDON.
(Before Mr. TAMLYN.)

ST. MARY, BOTHAW.
In this parish the were six objections taken by the Con
servative party, five of which were
,allowed—the claimants
not having resided for twelve months'in the parish, or hay'
ing left previous to July last. The objection to the name
of Mr. Jellicoe was disallowed. -
ST. MARY AT HILL.
TII9 claim of Julius Greenwood was opposed by I\fr;
Trott, the agent for the Reform party. The rating an
°
occupation was proved, and the objection disallowed.
Th objection by the same party to Mr. Wm. Peek
°
withdrawn, but objections were taken to the names
Richard and James Peek, partners of William Peek, on, the
ground that the entry in the rate-book being '`rek'
Brothers, and C 0.," did not constitute a good rating for
the other partners.

Objection disallowed.
There were twelve claims in this list, but the parties,
did
not appear, and they were consequently disallowed.

ST. MARY, STEYNING.
There were no claims or objections in this list.
ST. MARY, ALDERMANEURY.
The Court then proceeded with the revision of the
for this parish.
The business proceeds very slowly, iu consequence of thet
non-attendance of the 'parish-officers, for whom, in jib°
every case, the Revising Barrister is obliged to send
sengers.

(Before Mr. Camo.) jt
The case of John Barham was the first gone into.
appeared that he had occupied the house out of which he
claimed, for ten months, during which time he paid all ill°
rates in the proper time, but there was no evidence of bi!
having paid any rates for the two months he occupiedothe'
premises.
Mr. CRAIG was of opinion that in the absence of anyt
proof of his having been rated for the two months, he ough
not to be called upon to prove payment ; but as the cay
was likely to govern many others, he would have it argue
and afterwards give his judgment upon it.
Mr. John Alphonso Doxat claimed in respect of L'
house in Bishopsgate-street. He was objected to by Sr;
Sharpe. It appeared from the evidence that the clairnai'd
was rated for the house in question at 2001. a-Year,
an
had occupied it upwards of 60 years, and paid all °Le
and taxes. l'ti
Mr. Rowcroft trusted Mr. Sharpe was satisfied
that evidence.

Mr. Sharpe—No, there is no proof of residence.
Mr. CRAIG would let the case stand over till the 11l
of the Court, in order that the defect might be suppliewpb
Mr. Rowcroft could not but express his surprise et 5%,
an objection being taken—he was astonished to see It Pe
sisted it. •
The claim of Mr. Crawford Davis was also objected to
by Mr. Sharpe.
Evidence was given of the house in Broad-street beil
rated at 1501., that all rates and taxes were paid, and CI
the claimant's residence was in Portland-place.
a lease of the house, but neither he nor any of his serants
slept in it. The lower part was kept clean by the seri°
of a lady who occupied the upper part of the house. 4:00
Mr. CRAIG doubted whether there was an °calf° ti
here within the meaning of the Act. Occupation ia't, he
house meant a residence in some part of it. }lac" 0
claim been for a counting house, the evidence would has
been suffico ien
wc t.
Mr. Rroft, however reluctantly, felt compelled btagt
abandon the claim. The case was a very hard one--t, to
a gentleman rated at 1501. should be disqualified owiaa
such a triflin mis-escritin. aid
Mr. CRAIG said the capseo would be postponed—he s'l°
give judgment in it on another occasion.
Mr. Rowcroft said he attended there to establish lif;110;
ciples 'and not votes. lie would not press this ow
further.