The Sun.
London, England, 1859-06-22 00:00:00

BANE _RETURNS.

JOINT STOCK BANKS.
Bank of Westmorland, Kendal £11,992
Barnsley Banking Company, Barnsley. 9,403
Bradford Banking Company, Bradford. 48,345
Bilston. District Banking Company, Wolver-
hampton 9,500
Bank of Whitehaven, Whitehaven
Bradford Commercial Banking Company, Bradford 20,250
Burton, Uttoxeter, and Staffordshire Union Bank-

ing Company, Burton-upon-Trent — 53,206
Chesterfield and North Derbyshire Banking Com-
pany, Chesterfield.
Cumberland Union Banking Company, Work-
ington
Coventry and Warwickshire Banking Company,
Coventry
Coventry Union Banking Company, Coventry 14,704
County of Gloucester Banking Co., Cheltenham —
Carlisle and Cumberland Banking Co., Carlisle
Carlisle City and District Bank, Carlisle
Dudley and West Bromwich Banking Co., Dudley 33,288
Derby and Derbyshire Banking Company Derby 19,465
Darlington District Joint Stock Banking Company,

- - .
11 Darlington - 25,690
East of England Bank, Norwich 23,874
Gloucestershire Banking Company, Gloucester 145,114
Halifax Joint Stock Bank, Halifax 18,290
Huddersfield Banking Company, Huddersfield 37,255
Hull Banking Company, Hull
Halifax Commercial Banking Company, Halifax 12,691
Halifax and Huddersfield Union Banking Co. Halifax
Holston Banking Company, Holston
Herefordshire Banking Company, Hereford 20,388
Knaresborough and Claro Banking Company,
Knaresborough 28,623
Kingsbridge Joint-Stock Bank, Kingsbridge
Lancaster Banking Company, Lancaster
Leeds Banking Company, Leeds 23,023
Leicestershire Banking Company, Leicester. 77,160
Lincoln and Lindsey Banking Company, Lincoln 62,557
Leamington Priors and Warwickshire Banking
Company, Leamington Priors
Ludlow and Tenbury Bank, Ludlow
Moore and Robinson's Nottinghamshire Banking
Company, Nottingham
Nottingham and Nottinghamshire Banking Com-
pany Nottingham
National Provincial Bank of England, Birmingham
(Head Office, 112, Bishopsgate-street, London) 426,645
North Wilts Banking Company, Melksham
Northamptonshire Union. Bank, Northampton 73,275
Northamptonshire Banking Company, Northampton 20,328
North and South Wales Bank, Liverpool
Pares's Leicestershire Banking Company, Liverpool..
65666
Saddleworth Banking Company, Saddleworth .. 2,281
Stamford, Spalding and Boston Banking Company,
Sheffield Banking Company, Sheffield. . -
Stamford
49,723
Stuckey's Banking Company, Bri tol So
s merset-... 'gm
Shropshire Banking Company, Shiffnall. ........ .
shire Bank, and Somersetshire Bank, Lang Port • '''''`-v
34;686
37,814
Stourbridsagtonedurairiailddgame..shir" Kidderminsteroia.....gßan.king Com: 51,460
SheffieldPanY • .............
bo , Sheffield 22,410

ARRIVAL FROM AUSTRALIA.—FALMOUTH, Tues-
day.—The ship Suffolk, Martin, master, has arrived from
Melbourne, and landed mails and passengers; on freight
about 43,000 ounces of gold dust, including the Welcome
nugget.
About £llO,OOO in gold has arrived from St.
Petersburg; £25,000 has been taken to the Bank, and the
remainder has been sold for exportation. About £220,000
of the gold by the Asia has also been taken for the Con-
tinent.
SUNDAY SAILING ON THE CLYDE,--A lawsuit
for some years pending in the Court of Session in reference
to the use of the piers at Gareloch by passengers landing
from steamers plying on the Clyde on Sundays has just
been brought to a termination. When the Sunday steamer
was first started on the Clyde, in 1853, Sir James Colqu-
t, proprietor of the piers of Garelochead, Row, and Row-
urlie, took forcible measures to prevent the landing of the
passengers there, and for several Sundays the piers were
the scene of unseemly contests between the passengers at-
tempting to land and the servants of the proprietor resist-
ing the attempt. Legal measures were then taken on the
one side to interdict, and on the other to claim, the use of
the pier by the public on Sundays. The Court
in the first instance refused to interdict the public
use of the pier on Sundays until the proprietor had
established his rights in a possessory action to exclude the
public. In the action as ultimately brought it was ad-
mitted,by the defenders (Paton and others, owners of the
steamer Emperor) that the three piers in question had all
been built by Sir James Colquhoun at his own expense,
and the question at issue was whether the piers being used
by the public on the six days of the week the public were
entitled also to use them on the seventh. The Court held
that in the _circumstances in which these piers had been
erected the proprietor was entitled, in virtue, of possession
and of usage previous to 1853, to restrict the public use of
the piers in the way he sought to do,,and that the proprietor
did not necessarily sacrifice his private rights by giving the
public access to'the piers, there being no grant of free-port
in the case. The court therefore interdicted the defenders
from landing passengers at the piers in question in vessels
leaving and returning to Glasgow on
Sundays.