The Sun.
London, England, 1859-08-12 00:00:00

NO MORE MEDICINE

Price 2d., free by Wst,a);Oiufiil;eatifi;sixty-feur Paovs,
THE NATURAL REGENERATION of the DIGESTIVE

ORGANS,
•
practically illustrating the effectual Cure. without Medicine,
'of Indigestion (dyspepsia), habitual Constipation, Flatulency
Acidity, Palpitation of the Heart, Torpidity of the Liver,
Mons Headaches; Nervousness, Biliousness, General Debi-
I ty, Cough, Asthma, Consumption,'Despondency, Spleen, &C.,
without Pills, Purgatives, or Medicine of any 'kind, by a
pleasant, and infallible means • adapted to the general
reader. London : Barry Du Barry & Co., 77, Regent-street.

THE SECRET GUIDE TO HEAT TH AND
HAPPINESS. AM EDICAL "WORK. Post free,
on receipt of two penny stamps, direct from No. 19,
Berners-street, Oxford-street, illustrated with 100 opinions
of ValpsaU, Lallemand, Roux, Ricord, Rm. It gives
engravings, containing the instructions for the perfect re-
storation of those who are pre- vented by impedlrnonts from
entering- into the married state, also showing the dreadful
results from early abuse, gonorrhoea and syphilis, and the
benefits arising from the chemical tests and the examination
of the spermatoza by the newly-constructed microscope,
with powerful lenses, and containing a valuable prescription
of lotion to prevent infection.

NEW AND IM PORTANT DISCOVERY IN THE
SCIENCE OF MEDICINE.
Patent Office Seal of Great Britain. Diplome de PEcole de
Pharmacie Pharmacien oe Paris. Imperial College of Me-
dicine, Vienna.
The Patentee has confided the preparation of these
Ines to to a Physician of the Royal University of Erlangen,
and Member of the Royal College of Surgeons of England
(who is registered under the New Medical Act) and attends
daily at No. 1, Benes-street, Oxford-street London be-
tween the hours ofr 11r and 2, and from 5 till 8, (Sundays, ex-
,epted), in order to advise Patients on their Diseases and
Treatment, and thus add to the speedy certainty of Cure.
TRIESEMAR Nos. 1,2, and .1, prepared in the form of a
lozenge. devoid of taste or smell, and can be carried in the
waistcoat pocket. Sold in tin cases, divided into separate
dos.s, adapted for both sexes.
'TRIESEMAR No. 1 is a Remedy for RELAXA-
TION, SPERMATORRHCEA, and all the distressing con-
sequences arising from early abuse, indiscriminate excesses,
or too long residence in hot climates. It has restored bodily
and sexual strength and vigour to thousands of debilitated
individuals who are now in the enjoyment of health and the
Functions of Manhood : and whatever may be the cause for
DTSQUALIFICATTONS for MARRIAGE, they are effectu-
ally subdued by this Wonderful Discovers,
TRIESEMAR NO. IT.
effectually, in the short space of three days, completely and
entirely eradicates all traces of Gonorrhoea, both in its mild
and aggravated forms, Gleets, Strictures, Irritation of the
Bladder, Non-retention of Urine.
Pains of the Loins and
Kidneys, and those disorders which so often ruin the health
of a vast portion of the population.
TRIESEMAR NO. ITT•
is the great Continental Remedy for Syphilis and Secon-
dary Symptoms : it constitutes a certain cure for Scurvy,
Scrofula, and all Cutaneous Eruptions, removing all impu-
rities from the vital stream, so as altogether to eradicate
the virus of disease, and expel it through the medium of the
con-
stitution, repos_ of the skin and urine, and is a remedy for that class
treats with
restore."' and
feom the establishment, with Mercury, to the destruction of the patient's con-
vrice
4..
Rd. (by
unfortunately the English Physician
which all the sarsaparilla is the world cannot
London (free enpto.stl9s, one. 6rdn)ersaysdtreeltl,s.6xfseonrdt.gdtirreeectt,
United Kingdom; Y
to Medicus, and sig?
post Is. Bd. extra, to any part of the
qaminfr of LI 12s
post Bs. 2d. eN or four cases in one for 3.35„ by
,ral, Which saves Ils., and in £.-5 cases,
sent by return of
55. Farringdon-street
n receipt of Post-office Order, payable
post. To t
of the case, the Medicines will be
.To be had also of Barclay and Sons,
street; Bartlett Hooper R. Howden, 78, Gracechurch-
rem London-bridge).-r 3".11g Wil4sm-strest (four doors

ELECTION COMMITTEES.

WITHDRAWAL OF THE PONTEFRACT gLEC.
TION PETITION.
COMMITTEE OF INQUIRY.
Yesterday the committee appointed to inquire
into the petition of Mr. Hugh Childers, complain-
ing of the conduct of the sitting member, Mr. Over-
end, relative to the withdrawal of the petition
against his return, resumed their labours in Com-
mittee-room No. 17. Mr. Walpole was in the
chair, and the other members of the committee
Mr. Glyn, Lord R. Clinton, Captain Jervis,
Craufurd, Mr. Phillips, and Mr. Selwyn,—were all
present.
Mr. Leeman, who was examined on the previous
day (Wednesday), said he wished to add to the evi-
dence which he thedgave. The witness entered
into a long detail of various circumstances more or
less connected with the election.
Mr. Childers then proceeded to confirm generally
the evidence given by Mr. Leeman. He added that
he should never have consented to withdraw the
petition, except upon the. understanding that the
question of the, seat was to be referred to arbitra-
tion. If he had ever believed that the seat was
not to be referred he should immediately have in•
strutted Mr. Leeman to decline to sign any agree-
ment. The first information he received of any
difficulty came from Pon:efract. He was in-
formed that Mr. Cariss had stated at the Leeds
Club-house that the seat was not in question,
but that the petition was withdrawn uncondi-
tionally. He subsequently saw Mr. Cariss,
who said, on the subject being mentioned to him,
-" Oh, I was only chaffiing ; I wasn't going to let them
know what we were doing." Subsequently he saw
Mr. Rose, who, after some coversation, said the
seat had never been in question at all. He imme-
diately took Mr. Rose to Mr. Leeman to talk the
matter over, as up to that time he had never heard
a word from Mr. Rose or anybody connected with
Mr. Overend that the seat was not included in the
reference. When Mr. Rose went to Mr. Leeman
witness offered to golor Mr. Baxter. Ultimately
he did so, and met him in the street. He took him
to Mr. Leeman at Fendall's Hotel, having previ-
ously told him that, as it was a case in which the
honour of several gentlemen was concerned, he
simply wished him to hear a statement without
requiring him to express any opinion. On the
mornings of Tuesday and Wednesday, the 2d and
3d of August, the whole case was gone into between
Mr Rose and Mr. Leeman., Upon one of these
occasions Mr. Rose admitted. that Mr. Spofforth
had stated to Min the conversation which he had
with Mr., Leeman as to the reference of the seat.
Mr. Rose also stated that he had written to Mr.
Overend characterising the agreement as "illusory"
The Chairman -asked Mr. Childers if Mr. Rose
said that he had simply.written to say the agree-
ment was illusory, or that he considered that the
agreement was illusory ?
Mr. Childers said Mr. Rose expressed no decided
opinion of his own, but merely implied that he had
made such a representation to Mr. Overend. Wit-
ness then confirmed Mr. Leeman's evidence as to
the interview with Lord March. He added that up
to the time he went to fetch Mr. Brand, Mr. Over-
end had most distinctly refused to refer the seat to
Lord March, when Mr. Brand could not be found.
Lord March said, "What am Itodo ?" Some con-
versation ensued; and Lord March again said,
" What can Ido ?" Mr. Leeman said, " Well my
lord, we withdraw the reference." Mr. Rose at
once interposed, and said, "-As my honour is at
stake' I should, wish the inquiry to go on ;" where-
upon Mr. Overend said, " I think so too. I consent
that Lord March shall decide upon the prelimi-
nary inquiry." Mr. Leeman rejoined, "It is now
too late."
Mr. Wilkinson, London agent of Mr. Childers,
was then called. After corroborating the evidence
of Mr. Leeman in reference to various interviews
between the different parties, he proceeded to say
—I was at Fendall's Hotel when the agreements
were exchanged, and I recollect Mr. Childers mak-
ing an observation in reference to the issue of a
new writ. He said he thought the writ ought to
be issued as early as possible, so that he might be
returned and take his seat this session. I said,
" The session is now nearly at an end, and it does
not matter whether you take you seat or not, so
long as you are returned." Both Mr. Rose and
Mr. Spofforth were present, but they nude no com-
ment. Mr. Leeman said to Mr. Rose, " What I
propose to do is to open my brief to you, and go
into each case as it arises. We shall have no diffi-
culty, and in a very little time we shall be able to
clear the ground so as to leave a very narrow ques-
tion for the decision of Lord March." A conversa-
tion then took place as to Mr. Rose's engagements.
Mr. Spofforth • said that if Mr. Rose could not at-
tend it would be necessary to employ counsel. I
said, if we have counsel, we shall incur the expense
we are so anxious to avoid. The subject then drop-
ped. As the London agent of Mr. Childers I advised
whh tookiaasn,edas to what ought to be done in the matter. I
o
wn
n allowedg ar teattmh epr e.alrcetchtiiilnodnei
rtf.so r
tlosfourshould
withdraw
fiddre ve
ae
certainly
datiahnyel syp,
nebuttoi
t.
seat
toon
aarnhyitroatthieern.terAmshethavayn tehxepernesfeerwenmcealorfeatdhye
to' nlcreurrerne dd , t
haand tit wweashi antdp
essus
hhl e aforeaussetagainstd
rllalwr.
the petition upon any other terms. Our case was
perfectly conclusive, and having ascertained the
wmnetth.
.cheo reus.
whateverleßdaat
bxaea
tgstar Speaker'sagainst
Tot t warrants
‘ne
ia.
reason
e.haTces ahoh vnei Childers,
had
dnokasnneotdnhhweiutnwilphgooe other side we were satisfledthat
edersewt
i woe nolu.
been servoswepo
personsqat hnu
argument
that
beforeth e seatt h e arbitrator
never
was w
in
ex-
pense.
question. Mr. Leeman attempted to open the re-
ference, when Mr. Overend at once interposed.
There was a good deal of discussion, lklr. Overend
endeavouring to prevent our going into the ques-
tion, and Lord March began to feel more distinctly
the position in which he might be placed in a
matter involving the jurisdiction of a committee of
the house. Mr. Leeman was very indignant at
not being allowed to state the main case: If the
seat were:not in question we had nothing to do
there. In the course of his observations Mr.
Leeman made some remarks which evidently hurt
Mr. Rose, and almost electrified him, for he jumped
up from his seat and moved away to another one,
saying that he hoped Lord March would not attend
to anything of that kind.
This being the whole of the evidence on the part
of the petitioner,
Mr. Rose was then examined by Mr. Baxter,
and in detail gavo a ;succinct ;statement of what
had taken place between himself and Mr • Leeman
relative to the agreement for the arbitration of
Lord March, and said he most distinctly under-
stood throughout that the question as to the seat
was not included in the reference, and he had told
Mr. Overend so, and was always under that im-
pression; he assured the committee he had acted
in full belief that such was the case.
Mr. Cariss was called, and spoke to what took
place between him and Mr. Wilkinson at Ponte-
fract.

Mr. Overend was then examined. He repeated
in substance his statement before the house on
Wednesday, and stated that he had given the most
Positive and distinct instructions to Mr. Carissthat
he would consent to no agreement of reference as
a condition for the withdrawal of the petition that
would leave the question as to the seat open. He
had from the first the fullest determination not to
do so, and always understood it formed no part of
the agreement. When before Lord March, Mr.
Leeman argued the question of his going into the
reference as 'to the seat, and he was followed by
Mr. Rose, insisting that the question of the seat
was to form no part of the reference. His first op-
position was to the reading of Mr- Rose's letter;
but as he found it affected the male fides of Mr.
Rose, he withdrew his opposition, and had done so
two hours before; but he declined to assent to going
into the question of the seat. Lord March said he be-
lieved there was bona fides on both &des, and it was
difficult to determine. Mr. Cariss had written down
what Lord March had said, when Lord March said
he had decided nothing, and the paper should be
torn up, which he (Mr. Overend) did at once. Mr.
Leeman then withdrew from the inquiry. He told
him that he had consented to the preliminary in-
quiry being gone into two hours before, but Mr.
Leeman said it was too late. Mr. Leemcn after-
wards spoke, to him in the lobby, and said the
matter should not stop there, and that he (Mr.
Overend) had better be in his place in the house
that night. He requested him not to tease him, as
he had enough of it.
Cross-examined by Mr. Leeman—Was positive