The Sun.
London, England, 1835-10-08 00:00:00

SERVICE OF NOTICE.

A claimant named Carey was objeciea to by the RI..
Formers.

Mr. Adey required the service of nktice of objection to
be proved.
Mr. Davies informed the Court that he had himself
served the notice personally.
Mr. COVENTRY observed that the Act directed that no
person who was on the register, or claiming to be put on it,
had any right to object to another.
The notice was admitted, but the decision of the claim
was adjourned for want of sufficient evidence.
At the close of the day the numbers stood as follows :

FVLIIA:11.

Tory objections
No Reform objections.
cut SNUCK.

Tory objections
Sustained

HA nm ER S MITII.

By the Reformers 8 By the Tories 4O
I
Sustained
It will be seen by the above list how groundless was the
far greater number of the objections urged by the Tories in
these parishes. The appearance of the party objected to,
or of the person authorized by him to attend, was the signal,
in almost all the cases, for the agents of the Tories to refrain
from pressing, or at once to abandon the objections pre-
ferred by their party.
Amongst those objected to by the Tories were Sir J.
Lillie, and Mr. Pryme, M.P., both of whom were admitted
to vote, as they were found by the barristers to possess the
requisite qualification.

BOROUGH OF FINSBURY.
AL'. CHAPMAN' and Mr. MEnivALE yesterday resumed
the consideration of the lists submitted to them at the usual
hour.

ST. JAMES'S, CEERKENWELL.—NEW RIVER COMPANY.
Mr. Al'nail opposed the claim of the Secretary of the
New River Company to be placed on the register.
Mr. CHAPMAN decided, that as there was no proof that
the claimant himself was rated, the name could not be
inserted.

The list of the parish having been gone through, the fol-
lowing is the result :
Liberal claims
Sustained
Disallowed
Tory claims
Sustained
Disallowed
Objections by Tories
Names struck out
Names retained
ST. GEORGE AND ST. ANDREW'S, HOLBORN.
InClSl{,li RESPECTING ALIENS.
• Mr. MErtiVka .]having' decided that
rested on the party making the objection on the ground of
alienation ; and Mr. "Murelyon not having been prepared
with sufficient evidence to prove that fact at the time the
names were called in their regular order,
Mr. Murelyon now appeared to object to the names of
John Gugeri and Antoine Tagliabue.
It appeared that the Tory agent had made an unsuccess-
ful application to the Under Secretary of State for evidence
to support his case.
Mr. MERIVALE, after hearing the evidence against the
claim, and Mr. Rogers in support of it, struck out the name
of the applicant.

The objection to the claim of Antoine Tagliabue, having
been made under similar circumstances, was disallowed, as
in the last case.
SAFFRON-HILL, HATTON-GARDEN, AND ELY
RENTS.
There are 310 names on the list ; and there are 28
claims, and 13 objections.
The result of yesterday's revision was—
Conservative claims l5 Reform claims
Sustained l4 Sustained .
Disallowed

EASTERN DIVISION OF SURREY.
The cases which had been adjourned in the parish of
Croydon were taken, and with one exception decided, to
the number of 18.

The claim of the Rev. George Cole was objected to by
the overseers. The claimant was appointed curate of St.
James's Chapel, Croydon, by the present and preceding
vicars of the District Church.

Mr. Drummond, for the Conservatives, that as the 59
Geo. 3, assigned over the pew rents to the Minister for the
time being, except 151. to the parish clerk, and as the office
was like that of a perpetual curate, the claimant had a free-
hold interest in those pew rents, and might claim to vote for
the county on that account.
Mr. KNOX said, on looking to the Act (chap. 134, sect.
21) he discovered that these rents were, in fact, assigned to
the churchwardens as a fund in trust, out of which the
"stipends" of the minister and the parish clerk were to be
paid. Therefore, as there could be no freehold interest,
the vote must be disallowed.
Mr. KNox gave his judgment on the' claims of certain
persons who claimed as trustees of the Friends' Meetinc,
House, Croydon. The case differed from the other case of
trusteeship. He having always held that trustees in the
actual possession and administration of trust property were
eligible to vote for counties, should in the present instance
decide in a similar manner, and accordingly declared the
claim allowed.

The list of voters for the parishes of Chelsham, War-
lingham, Horne, Farley, Crowhurst, and Torsfield, in the
Hundred of Tandridge, were revised with but few objec-
tions. There were about twenty-five new claims.
In the parishises 'of Chipstead, Mersthem, Nudigate,
Bustow, Charlwood, Mordan, and Kingwood Liberty (Hun-
dred of Reigate), there were forty new claims.
No important case arose in the revision of these lists.
Mr. LENNARD gave his julgment on the postponed case
of T. Beale, parish c:erk of Carsha!ton. As there was no
endowment nor freehold interest in land he disallowed the
claim.

The Courts adjourned at about two o'clock, leaving one
parish (Horley) unfinished, and two cases only adjourned.

WEST KENT.
Yesterday the Revising Barristers, Messrs. Fisll and
BROCKMAN, held their Court at the Mitre Tavern, Green-
wich, for this division of the county of Kent.
The objections made to the list were one hundred and
thirty by the Conservatives, and about eighty objections on
the part of the Liberals.

Mr. Visit went through the list of the parishes of St.
Paul and St. Nicholas, Deptford, and Mr. BROCKMAN
through that of the parish of Lewisham.
The result of the day's proceedings must be highly gra-
tifying- to the Reformers, the objections made and sustained
against the Conservatives being 37, and the objections sus-
tained against the Reformers being only 13. The Messrs.
Parkers, of Lewisham, were the attorneys employed by the
Conservatives, and Mr. Suter, of London-street, Green-
wich, and Mr. Frederick Riddle, supported the claims of
the Reformers, and objected to those of the Conservatives.
In the course of the morning Mr. BROCKMAN decided
that printed notices of objection served upon a party, and
the person so serving them not keeping a duplicate of them,
such notices would not be considered sufficient—whereby
several objections on the part of the Conservatives failed.
There was no case occurred of any particular interest
during the day except a decision of Mr. Pis'', who allowed
the claim of the clerk of Barker's Chapel, at Deptford, to
be registered, in consequence of his being in the receipt of
.5/. per annum, payable under the will of the late Mr. Win-
grove ; and refusing the claim of the minister of the same
chapel to be registered, although there appeared no substan-
tial difference in them, which created considerable surprise
in the Court.

The COURT adjourned at four o'clock until ten o'clock
to-morrow, when it is expected that the list for this division
of the count., will be completed.

}'