The Sun.
London, England, 1835-07-20 00:00:00

THE SUN, LONDON, MONIN A 1"
I I LY U 20, 1835
AL.I •-

to this new support,'"

vi " Protestantinii oti a firm

. Mini 'is to prevent Mre Whittle Harvey
from classing the Protestant. Clergy for. tbe,, future
the " State paiiperW' Mid bringing forward
a discussion 'Oh the incomes of any of them, in the
course of his annual motion for the revision of the
Pension List,--and what is to prevent the House of
Commons from every year lopping off one or more
from this list ? And do the Clergy of to&latfd ima-
gine that, when the Ministers of the Irish Church
shall
,have been set down as " State paupers," they
(the English Clergy) will remain long excluded from
that classification ? Lastly—Do the Protestants of
England know that, until Lord Morpeth's " reserve
fund" shall come into operation (or, to use his own
phrase, " while it is ill its infancy," which infancy
will have the usual legal duration of, at least, twenty-
one years) they will have to pay fifty thousand pounds
per annum for the instruction of the rising generation
in Ireland in the elements of the Catholic religion ?
for such, or we are much mistaken, will be the effect
of the 92d clause in the proposed Bill ? Well may
Mr. O'Connell support the present Ministry ! Well may
he subscribe himself to all of them, as he has sub-
scribed himself to Mr. Spring Rice (in that precious
letter which is at present exhibited in an " Autograph
Album," on that Right Hon. Gentleman's drawing-
room table), " Your's qffectionately, Daniel O'Con-
nell !"—Morning Post.
The John Bull of yesterday makes some severe
animadversions on our contemporary, the Morning
Chronicle, for alluding to an intended conspiracy of
the Monarch and the Court to unseat the present Mi-
nisters. Amidst a mass of inane rhapsodies, we find
the following sentence in the Tory print :—" It is, we
believe, a novelty in the affairs of nations, to find the
King's Ministers themselves, through the avowed and
acknowledged Government journal, assailing, libelling,
and ridiculing the Monarch whose servants they are,
and endeavouring to excite a feeling towards the Sove-
reign, his Crown and dignity,' which it is their
bounden duty to check and suppress whenever and
wherever it appears in other quarters." Now, we are not
aware ofthe Chronicle being " the avowed and acknow-
ledged Government journal ;" but we know that the
circulation of such reports or indecent allusions to the
Monarch, such as were made by our Contemporary,
are, as they ought to be, most averse from the wishes,
and most offensive to the feelings, of the Ministers
themselves. Were they guilty of encouraging or in
any manner necessary to the propagation of such
rumours, whether well or ill-founded, such betrayal of
confidence would naturally and justly expose them to
the indignation of the Sovereign, and the contempt of
all honourable men. It is needless to inquire what are
the real desires of the Court in regard to the Cabinet—
they are well known, and must be well known to every
one who bears in his recollection the events of last No-
vember ; but the time is past and gone when either
Kings or Courts could, with impunity, dismiss a justly
popular Administration. No : it is to the House of Com-
mons that we now look for data on which to ground an
opinion of the stability of a Government ; and, from
some opportunities which we have of judging, we can
confidently assert that the Ministers are receiving daily
accessions of supporters from amongst the representa-
tives of the people, while the Tories are losing their
organization in the House, and dividing into separate
and distinct parties, at the heads of which Lord
Stanley, Sir R.Vyvvan, and Sir Robert Peel represent
the three degrees of illiberality. The Chronicle is no
doubt right to give publicity to whatever it may deem
the true position of affairs, but we caution our Sunday
contemporary, the John Bull, against the supposition
that these announcements are made either with the
knowledge or sanction of the Ministry, or of any of its
members. There is not a word of truth in the suppo-
sition of our contemporary.—Morning Advertiser.

HOUSE OF LORDS.

JUDGMENTS.-APPEALS.-BAILLIE V. THE EDINBURGH OIL

GAS COMPANY.

At half-past four Lord BROUGHAM gave judgment in
this case. His Lordship had, during the argument on a
previous day, stated the grounds on which it was impos-
sible that he could either totally affirm or reverse this de-
cree, and that he should call in assistance, to enable him to
arrive at the law of the case, as it bore on the transaction
in its progress through the lower Court. In looking into
the last decree he found that it was not a final one—that it
was in fact only a reference of part of the case, and not of
the whole matter In dispute. The last reference Wale
arbitrator, Mr. M`Neil, takes out of the case any fur-
ther question of claim for further calls on the execu-
tors of Mr. Clyne, as a shareholder of the Edinburgh
Oil Gas-light Company. After looking closely into the
causes of that reference, and what were the results intended
by the arbitrator, he was of this opinion, that out
of the sum of 2891. 16s. 101 d., claimed by Mr. Clyne's
executors (appellants in this case), only one half is justly
due by the Oil Gas Company that is, one share, and the inte-
rest thereof. That reduces the liability on this head to
144/. 18s. Sid. ; that is to say, in other words, that
144/. 18s. Sid. must be taken off from the sum which the
party is called on to pay. Both the arbitrators and him-
self agreed in declaring " that Mr. Clyne is entitled to re-
ceive 780/. with interest (deducting 144/. 18s. 5d.), but
the arbitrators incautiously added the condition, on sur-
rendering his shares, instead of determinately saying, " He
shall surrender his shares, and they shall pay him the 780/.
with interest (deducting 145/. 18s 5-1 d )" He trusted
that this decision would put an end to the litigation in this
case. If not, he thought this House would know how to
deal with an appeal, if one should be again brought before
them. He could not allow the costs of the present appeal.
In conclusion, he would direct, as far as regarded the first
finding, that the award shall be partially reversed, or re-
duced so far as the value of one share with interest amounts
to, namely, 144/. 18s. sd. As to the second finding, it
shall be reversed altogether.
Interlocutors reversed accordingly.
BROWNE V. SINCLAIR AND OTHERS.

Lord BROUGHAM next read, at considerable length, the
judgment at which he had arrived in this very difficult and
cofflpiicated case, which turned on the nature and effects of
a decree in absence, pronounced by the Scottish Courts in
1775. In conclusion, the Noble Lord recommended their
Lordships to remit the ease, with directions, to the Court
of Seseion, from whence it came, with a view to prevent
further litigation ; and expressing his belief that the effect
of these directions would be to prevent its return to that
House.—Case remitted accordingly.

; ; l
. ,
snotifi such situation. tut in case any future
possessor of thee State should hat the entail, then the capi-
tal of the 10;0001... should belong to the heir apparent had
not such estate tail been kli•iA;
His IloNoua considered that a great portion of the li-
mitations respecting the 10,0001. were void—namely, as
soon as they got beyond lives in being and twenty-one years.
In his opinion, the fund in question belonged to the per-
sonal representatives of the original testator, who would
of tetitsb p# it o've'r tb tliZ, plaintiff a's the re-:;*iLitlaty lega-
tee by devolution from the original testator.

POLICE INTELLIGENCE.

GUILDIiAL L.

William Hoyle, a partner of Thomas M'Mahon and Co.,
of Wood-street, Cheapside, was brought up for final exa-
mination, charged with uttering two forged bills of ex-
change to Messrs. Kunio and Co., of Nottingham. The
bills, for 96/. and 109/., were produced, and proved to be
in the handwriting of the prisoner.
The prisoner cn the present occasion made no defence,
and was committed for trial.

Thomas D. _Feeley, formerly an attorney's clerk, and
Owen Collins, a labourer, were charged with uttering a
forged will, purporting to be that of John Collins, of Lamb-
court, Clerkenwcll.

Feeley was committed and Owen discharged.

HA TTON- GARDEN.

George HaHet, the driver of the cab, No. 1,497, was
eiarged with killing Julia C. Tapp, aged four years, the
daughter of a shoemaker in Steyman's-row, Islington.
While crossing the road near Balls' stables, Holloway, be-
tween one and two o'clock on Friday afternoon, she. was
run over and killed.

The prisoner was remanded till the result of the inquest
could be known.

DIARLBOROUGH-STREET.

Mr. Bowley, a fierce-looking little man, was charged
with having committed assault and battery on the person of
Dr. Crane, his lodger.
The complainant and his family occupied the principal
part of the defendant's house. On Saturday night, or early
in the morning, the inmates were disturbed by an incessant
ringing at the street-door bell, which having aroused him
(the complainant) he desired his servant to get up (the de-
fendant being without a domestic) and let the ringer in.
The defendant entered the house in a towering passion,
and ran up stairs towards his (complainant's) bed-room,
making use of sundry hard names and approbrious epithets.
Complainant went out to ask him the meaning of his insul-
ting conduct, on which the defendant called him a scoun-
drel for allowing him to kick his heels at the door so long,
and ultimately struck him a violent blow in the face. On
attempting to repeat his violence complainant was com-
pelled to exert his strength and push him down stairs. The
defendant, in addition to the assault, made use of expres-
sions which he was unable to fathom the meaning of.
Mr. DYEa—Well, Mr. Bowley, in your answer to the
charge we shall call upon you to confine yourself only
to such matters as relate to the assault on the complainant.
Defendant—Briefly, then, I shall state nothing but what
immediately bears on the question. My wife being on a visit
to her friends in the country, contrary to my usual habits I
strolled towards Astley's Amphitheatre, with the full deter-
mination of enjoying the entertainments of the evening.
After the conclusion of the performances I walked into
Mackintosh's, at the foot of the bridge, to have a simple
pint of porter and a crust of bread and cheese. I dispatched
my frugal supper. I settled with the waiter, and walked
leizurely towards South Audley-street. On arriving at my
door, not wishing, as it was late, to disturb any body, I
rang my bell thus (ringing an imaginary bell very gin-
gerly.) No one answered, and I rang again and again
with similar discretion. I then began to reflect that though
the' first ring might from accident have been unheard, the
neglect of the latter could only be attributed to design ; my
temper became exasperated, and I pulled without intermis-
sion thus (working his arm backwards and forwards vi-
gorously). I then heard a window open, and on looking
upwards, I perceived the defendant, who called out. " What
scoundrel is disturbing the house at this hour." I begged
for admission, and ultimately I rung on until his servant
came down and let me in. When I got admission, 1 went
up stairs to ask Dr. Crane for an explanation. He replied
roughly, I retorted angrily, and he then pulled my shirt
and tore it. Being roused, I struck at him, and then he
pitched me 'down the whole flight of stairs with so much
force that I am only astonished that, instead of my having
the pleasure of exhibiting this bump (taking up one of the
tails of his coat, and turning his back towards the bench)
to your Worships, a Coroner's Inquest was not the result.
Complainant—l did not put my head out of the window
while you were ringing.
Defendant—But, Dr. Crane, consider I was shut out of
my own house. Had a houseless tom-cat, or an unprotected
poodle sued for admission at such an hour, I should not
have had the heart to resist getting out of my head to let
them in.

Mr. HALLS—Was it part of your lodger's agreement to
get up and let you in whenever you chose to stop out to
such late hours ? Defendant—Why, no ; but, as a matter
of courtesy betwixt gentleman and gentleman, it ought to
have been the case. However, I bear no to the
complainant, and I am ready to offer my hand.
The complainant, however, refused the pledge ; and on
assuring the Bench he expected a repetition of similar vio-
lence, the Magistrates decided on requiring the defendant
to find sureties.

PRICES OF CANALS, DOCK STOCKS,

ASSURANCE COMPANIES, &c.&c. &c.

LONDON, FRIDAY, JULY 17.

vu
of Dividend . Pr;ce
of t'l • • - CANALS. • per ,
Shaus. Annum. Pahl. Snare.
;,7c9
.6,1 per cent. Ashton and Oldham-. AVot2gt 071. 18s, all, 160
1,482 6/. AsrMi..oc...-le-Zoucti ... Average 112/. sh. t'F,
1,211') ....,,,..., Basingstoke
c 5,)
't 1) if li •d Al
1,005 ~ . ~ree nog an >ergavenny ~,rvi . sh. , 3
4.,ooeish. 121. Ids. Bifnilfighalli, i slim.% - . 17/. ii,;! 21S
4,00,, • - Ditto and Livefrol iittict.,,,l4o/: eh: all pd
64)0 .. Bridgewater and Taunton .....10N. sti. nil pi 64
4'.0 r.i. Chtimer and Blackwater 10:1. sh. 10::
500 42/. CtiVehtty ••• 1001. eh.
4,5:6 Croydon ;..JA7>er/ige 311.25. 10d. sh.
2,0601 3/. 10s. Dudley ....•.. -;!!!9•/, sh. 74
600 6!. Derby 1004 sil. 1:.0
3,51 N n+,,,,.., Ellesmere and Chester Average 1:53/. sh. 89
231 43 . trettaSll . 0.,,,.,
1;297 '.8.1. Forth ,nd etyde ~,,-Average 40'3 lrs. sh. gni
11,501 121. Grand Junction •-, • hi/. sh. t.,3;
2,844 Grand Union 11.0/. th, ,24
1,521 • Grand Surrey 1• 1/. sh.
120,01.0. 41. percent. Ditto (optional) Loan lOOl. 73
3,096 Grana Weet.ern
6.10 13/. Its. Bd. Glam-rganshire, Average cost 1721. 13s. 4d. 230
1,960 Gloucester and 6crkley 191. sh. 15
149 04. Grantham .x....;501, A 1). 202
6,238 11. 10e Huddersfield Nverage Yll. 6s. Gd. sh. 33
100 Kensingt,n
23,328 11. Kennet and Avon, Average 301.85. 10d. sh. 20
2,897 f 2cl. Leeds and Liverpool 10, '1 . sh. 525
545 121.. . Leicester llO/ sh. 1-IS
9117 41. Leicester and North,anp. 0n... Av cr 381. itie. 60
559 5/. per cent. Liskeard and Lode Unio,, .5/. sh. all pd. 25
7 1 114/. Loughborough . Average 1421. 17s. sh.- 1,520
2,409 14 hloumnuthsi.ire lOO/. sh. 180
250 91. Melton Mowbray 1001 sh. 100
500 25/. Mersey and Irwell lOO/. sh. 56;
3,000
217 151. Neat h 1001. nil.
100
1,786 . 321. • Oxford 10111. sh. 615
522 - 21. Oak ham 130/. sh. 1,3

..0.4 c..
2,400 4/. Peak Forest Average about ;el. sh. 100
21,418 14s. Regent's (or London) Aver. 33/. 16s. 3d. sh. 151
5,669 Si. per cent. Rochdale Average 851. sh. 141
500 81. Shropshire 125/. sh. 110
800 10/. Somerset Coal 150/, sh. 163
45,000/. 6-1 percent. Ditto Lock Fund Stock 12/. 10s. sh. i 2,
730 36/. Stafford and Worcester l4+l sh. 690
500 111. Shrewsbury 1251. sh. 242,4
300 8/. Stourbridge
3,6-17 1/. 10s. Stratford-on-Avun ...Average 79/. Os. 3d. sh. :)8i
533 131. Swansea lOC/. sh. 215
3,78? 1/. Severn and Wye and Railway ...AV 30/. sh. 191
1,600 isn. 321. 10s. Trent and Mersey, I share 100/. sh. 625
8,149 Thames and Medway...Aver. 19/. ss. Bd. oh. 2
1,000 sh.l 151 Warwick and Birmingham 100/. sh. 280
1,000 foil. j
980 12, War wick and _ Napton lOO/ sh 21i .
. . ,

6;030 31:1.03 Worcester and Bi.rmingham...A v. 78/.B*. sh. 87
20.000 ss. Wilts and Berks .. Average 161. l'is. Ed. 6h. 5
800 6/, Wyrley and Essington 125/. sh '75
it:6 ....._ Wisbeach lO5l. sh. '45
905 11 Wey awl Arun llOl. ob. 221
DOCKS.
2'6°°B4 33n C. Commercial 1001. sh. 61
1,06515 h .'
198,66711.
3,238,310/. 21.55. p. ct. London Stock
Ditto Bonds lO3
1,380,0001. 5/. per ct. West India Stock V 7
2,::(1:1 Si. (is. 441. Bristol Average 144. 19s. sh.
62,324/. Si. per cent. Ditto Notes, various amounts llO
1.352,752 3 per cent. St. Katharine Stock 69
500,000 4f per cent. Ditto Bonds lOll
200,000 4 per cent. Ditto Bonds for 10 yea is lO2l
Shoreham Harbour 2571
BRIDGES.

1,6C0 It Ilammersmith 5O/. sh. 23
7,231 Southwark, Old Av. 63/. 9.5. Bd. sh. 21
1,700 IL 15s. Ditto, New, of 7„ per cent. 5O/. sh. 15
5,000
5,000 1/. 211. Ditto, Old Annuities of 81. 6Ol. pd 251
5,000 Ins. 3d. Ditto, New Ditto of 71 40/, pd 22f
60,0001. 51. per cent. Litt° Bonds llB
6,000 11. Vauxhall Average 701. 10s. 3d. sh. 22

ASSURANCE COMPANIES.
2,000 3/ 105 Albion 5001. sh. 501. pd 761
503000 [5 lard cSein. Li Alliance, British & Foreign 1004 sh. 10/. pd 111
50,000 6 per cent. Ditto, Marine 1001. sh. 5/. pd 51
24,000 10s. per sh. Atlas
1,200 I sh. 4/. Birmingham Fire 2506. sh. 551. pd 105
20,000 41. per cent. British Fire 250/. sh. 50/. pd 40
12,000 1/. per cent. British Commercial 50/. sh. 54 pd ei
5,000 5/. per cent. Clerical, Medical, &c. Life...loo/. sh. 2/ lOs pd 3i
4,000 2/ lOs County 'OO/. sh. 10/. pd 421
6,000 ss. Eagle 50/.sh. 51. pd 51
r Per cent. Economic Life lOOO/. sh. 250/. pd 315
200 tand 301 nt.)
2,271 511. per cent. European Life 00/. sh. all pd 22
50,000 2s. Ditto, New ,O/. sh. 2/. pd 11
1,000,0001. 71. per ct Globe Stock 156
20,000 1/. Guardian 1001 sh. 201. pd 331
„ (Tire 5 pct.l
4°'''''' Life 8 p ctj hope 5O/. sh. Si. pd 6
2,400 51. 7s. 6d. Imperial Fire 500/. sh. 50/. pd 117
7,500 Ps. Imperial Life 100/. sh. 104 pd 91
Si. per cent. Indemnity Marine 1, 01. sh. 81. pd 12
2,020 31. Kest Fire 501. sh. all pd 85
10,000 16s. Law Life 1004 sh. 104 pd 26
3,900 1/. London, Fire 251. sh. 12/. 10s. p.. 1 231
31,000 1/. London, Ship °5/. sh. 15/. 10s. pd 231
30,0:10 Si. per cent. Palladium Life 50/. sh. 2/. pd 2/83
250,00.) Is. 6d. Protector Fire 2Ol. sh. 21. pd 1/ Ss 6d
2,500 1/. Provident Life RIX sh. le/. pd 191
100.000 ss. Rock Life .201. sh. 21. pd 51 Us.
639,2204 5/. per cent. Royal Exchange Stink... 185
Sun 2lO
50,003 4 per cent. United Kingdom Life 2l. pd 212 s 6d