The Sun.
London, England, 1866-04-13 00:00:00

THE ~SUN" NEWSPAPER.-
G. R. GLENIE, Sporting Library, 4, Connaught-
terrace, Edgware-road, is specially appointed AGENT to
deliver the LATE EDITION of "THE SUN " at the
earliest possible moment after leaving the press. He is able
to deliver copies in Town, the Suburbs, and in many parts of
the Country at a comparatively early hour the same evening,
.ay 40 miles by 9 o'clock.

HE "
G.E.SUN" NEWSPAPER.-
GLENIE delivers the LATE EDITION at
Chelsea, 7.40 ; Kilburn, 8; Starch-green, 8; Woolwich, 7.30
Uxbridge, 9.20 ; Watford, 8.45.

TH.E LATEST EDITION of " THE SUN "
supplied, as soon as published every Evening, by
ALEXANDER. LEXANDER (late BROOKS), Newspaper Agent, 24'
Old Cavendisn- street, Oxford-street.

THE LAST EDITION of " THE SUN "
supplied as soon as Published, containing alt the
LA rEsT NEWS and S2ORTINer INTELLIGIIINCE, by
11. W. HALALS, Newspaper Agent, 4, Blackinars-roa,
London, S.

THE LATEST EDITION of "THE SUN."
J. HOLMES begs to inform his friends, and the pubiic
generally, ttai he supplies the LATNST E V.W
ITIS o
" " as soon as published —o. 16, Hampstead-
f
road, N.W.

SPORTING.—JOHN ROBERTS supplies the
LATs.ST EDITION of " TII SUN" as soon as pub.
lished.-4, Bath-street, City road, E.C.

HIGH WATER AT LONDON BRIDGE.

Tins DAY.-31orang, 12h. 14m.—Afternoon, 12h. 40m.
Ta-Ilitoßßow.-31orning, lh. [Am.—Afternoon, lh. 30m

41 1,
4t-w. At,
Mnr.
WA" Ac"Alig--
• 9)- `l*-

LONDON, FRIDAY, APRIL 13, 1866.

The interest with which the opening of the great
debate has been anticipated during the last few
weeks has gone on gradually increasing until yes-
terday afternoon the precincts of Westminster
presented an unwonted appearance, and the
densely-thronged galleries of the ;louse of Com-
mons betokened an exciting discussion. Nor was
the expectation of the eager listeners disappointed,
for the long debate of the evening showed that
whatever its electoral deficiencies or political
shortcomings our present Parliament gives at
least no unworthy representation of the spirit, the'
intelligence, and the general ability of the nation.
Opening with the eloquent discourse of the
Chancellor of the Exchequer, who on this occasion,
as at Liverpool, found his strongest arguments in
the general principles of Reform, rather than in any
particular commendation of the Bill itself, the
debate was continued by the calm good sense and
unimpassioned logic of Lord STANLEY, his most
dangerous, because most unbiassed opponent, and
less prominent members on both sides, who played
their parts with vigour and spirit. As a matter of
course the debate was adjourned, and will probably
go on for several nights, since there are a
host who are ready to come forward with
their arguments, their remonstrances, their
appeals, and their recriminations. into the several
views we have not space to enter. The detailed
report will find, as it deserves to do, plenty of
readers, for this is a question which, in spite of all
, sneers or denials, has aroused the warmest interest

throughout the country at large. The principa
points at issue, however, are simple enough, and
are argued, as we have said, with a vigour and an
eloquence worthy of an assembly of English states-
men. It is only just and reasonable to allow to
both supporters and opposers of the bill and the
amendment the position of men arguing on what
they think to be constitutional grounds for what they
believe to be the best interests of their country.
Granting to both sides this preliminary position,
we may examine their respective arguments without
prejudice or suspicion. Mr. GLADSTONE says that
pledges have been repeatedly given by the leading
stavaamen of the country to the people in inirbur of
constitutional reform ; that ever since 1.32
Parliament has been exerting itself most
successfully to raise and enlighten the people by the
creation of savings banks, by the enfranchisement
of the Press, by promoting education and other
kindred measures, whose objects have all been to
render the people better fitted for the possession of
political power. To turn round and deny its own
work to render the people fit for electoral privi-
leges, and then withhold those privileges, he declares
to be inconsistent, unjust, and impolitic. He asserts
that as a class the working-men of the country pay
five-twelfths of the taxation of the country, while
they only possess one-seventh of the electoral power
—thus manifestly contravening that doctrine of
constitutional government which provides that re-
presentation should be based upon taxation. As
for the division of the Franchise Bill and the Re-
distribution measure, Mr. GLADSTONE urges that
as the new electors could not geton the register till
June, 1867, there would be ample opportunity for
the settlement of both branches of the question.
Taking Lord STANLEY as his most formidable
opponent, and as the ablest advocate of the con-
trary theories, we find him objecting to the reticence
which the Government have observed with regard
to the Redistribution measure. " How can any one
guarantee," he asks, "that precisely the same
members may constitute the Cabinet in 1867, even
if it be nominally the same ? When we are fram-
ing a new Constitution for the country, it is as un-
safe," he says, " to sanction part of a plan, without
knowing the whole, as it would be to under-
take the building of a palace room by room
without any general design, but only on
the assurance of the architect that he knows his
business. The anomalies of the electoral divisions
are, Lord STANLEY contends, a worse evil than the
exclusion of the working classes from the franchise,
because the one in process of time has a tendency
to cure itself, the other to get worse and worse.
The rise of rents and wages has a gradual effect in
extending the franchise, whereas owing to the cen-
tralising tendency of trade great towns grow rapidly,
and small boroughs fall off. The difficulties in
the way of Redistribution would, he contended,
any
d,b
increased by the Franchise Bill, supposing that
question of foreign or domestic policy required a
dissolution previous to its settlement. The
House would have to appeal to the old
constituencies—already condemned—or if the regis-
ter allowed it it would be under a provisional con-
stitution neither embodying the old system nor the
new, and the increased weight of many of the exist-
ing boroughs would naturally be given against any
measure which affected themselves.
There is undoubtedly weight in these objections
and force in the arguments which were brought
against the bill, but the question in reality is not
whether the measure be theoretically perfect, not
even whether it is the best that could have been de-
vised under the circumstances, but whether the Re-
form Bill shall or shall not be carried this year.
Whatever
Politicians may contend, it is the exten-
sion of the franchise that is the all-important ques-
tion inthe
etiocme7thheior meto populart. estimation ; it is that which
personal neir
interests.sy m sympathies, i
Theyes, t lre
haveir sense n
g o f
been
n-
promised a measure of relief. Now, at last, after a
series of delays and v
which
standing
disgrace to the Liberal party, they are
have
i it
a
o
them in a tangible and practical form. Shall we,
then, because it is not all we wish or aspire to, dis-
appoint them again, and this time when the coveted
prize is actually within their grasp. Will not the
evils entailed by such a course be greater and more
attend
disastrous than any drawbacks which may