The Sun.
London, England, 1866-11-15 00:00:00

FRANCE.

:BounsE, Nov. 14.—Two o'clock.—The weakness
displayed towards yesterday's close has left no
traces, the market having resumed its buoyancy at
higher quotations. French Threes have gained 10c.,
to 69f. 33c. Italian Fives are also actively dealt in
at 55f. 45c., a rise of 15c. Credit Mobilier Shares
have advanced 7f. 50c., at 630 f. ; Spanish Mobilier,
3f. 75c., at 345 f. ; and Credit Foncier 5f., at 1,385 f.,
whilst Comptoir d'Escompte Shares continue sta-
tionary at 900 f. Ottoman Fives remain in favour,
with a further advance of 15f., at 33f. 40c. Rail-
way Shares are very firm, and some have slightly
risen; the most demanded are Austrian, which have
gained 7f. 50c., at 408 f. 75c., being thus quoted on
a par with Lombard. The telegram has brought if
rise from London.

Three o'Clock.—As yesterday, quotations have
fallen on most Securities towards the close, which
was as follows :

4* per Cents 97 50
Do. end month —
3 per Cents. 69 27;
Do. end month 69 27*
Credit Mobilier
Do. end month
Credit Fonder —
Do. end month 1383

Bank Shares 3625
Italian Loan 55 30
Do. end month 55 30
Mexican Loan —
Do. Bonds —
Spanish Threes
Home Debt
Deferred

'Ate.

For Account.
Orleans B7B 75
Northern llB2 50

Lyons and Mediterranean 917 50
Southern 583 75
Western 565
Eastern 532 50
Sardinian
_ _

Austrian
• - -

Lombard 4lO
_ _ _

North of Spain l3O
Saragosra l4B 75
Ditto to Barcelona —
Roman , —

The Right Hon. Sir John Pakington will take
possession of his official residence at the Admiralty at the
end of the present mouth.

In this case the plaintiff purchased a mare at Aldridge's
horse repository in St. Martin's-lane, which was warranted
to be sound and quiet in harness, and he paid first £5 and
afterwards £2O to a clerk at that establishment. The
horse not turning out to his satisfaction, he returned it on
the day of the purchase, stating that it was not quiet, and
requesting repayment of his money. This was refused by
Mr. Freeman, who said that, according to the conditions of
all sales of horses at the repository, they hould be tried
by some one connected with the establishment, in order
to prevent litigation by persons who might be dis-
satisfied with their purchases. However, the plaintiff
denied that he was bound by any rules of the establish-
ment, affirming that the sale was made by private contract,
and under certain conditions than those in operation at
the repository, and that these were agreed to in the pre-
sence of the clerk. Against this it was alleged that Mr.
Freeman, who had been 20 years in business in London
and had never had an action brought against him, would
not consent to any sale taking place at his repository that
was not strictly subject to the rules as stated in the cata-
logues.

The plaintiff brought an action, which was tried before
Mr. Justice Blackburn, for the recovery of the money ho
had deposited.

Mr. Montague Chambers, Q.C., now moved for a new
trial on the ground that the verdict was against the weight
of evidence.

Their lordships deferred judgment until they had con-
sulted Mr. Justice Blackburn.

COURT OF DIVORCE.
(Before Sir J. P. Wilde.)
MUItRELL V. MURRELL AND FULLER.

This was a suit by the husband, a fish salesman, at Great
Grimsby, for a dissolution of marriage on the ground of his
wife's adultery with the co-respondent. There was no de-
fence.

Dr. Spinks was counsel for the petitioner.
From the learned counsel's statement it appeared that
the parties were married at Prettywell, in Essex, in 1852,
and afterwards lived at Lowestoft and then at Great
Grimsby. There were three children, issue of the mar-
riage ; and it appeared that the parties lived happily
together until the May of 1865, when the petitioner, whose
business necessitated his frequent absence from home, dis-
covered that his wife had been carrying on an intrigue with
the co-respondent, a sawyer residing in the neighbourhood,
and he immediately separated from her. The respondent
and a woman Scholefield, who occasionally worked at the
house, were frequently waving their handkerchiefs and
making other signals to the co-respondent and a fellow
working for the petitioner, and they were also in the habit
of waiting for them outside. Evidence was given to show
the terms on which the parties lived, and Scholefield de-
posed to facts which left no doubt as to • criminality and
the nature of the intimacy that subsisted between the
defendants.
Decree nisi with costs.