The Sun.
London, England, 1835-03-03 00:00:00

sub e. cal, and eery other zpecies of agitation, for more
aseestttia benefits, such as the abolition of tithes, and
.oraTe
look f1(-3% I need hardly say, that with intense anxiety N
jorityUrWara to the consequences of the last triumphant ma-

(FRONT ANOTHER CORRESPONDENT.)
, MARCH 1. Zile daring impudence of the Times hasDUBLIN furnished the sub-
eir, late Yelpers of the Tory press n-Ph a lie, admirably adapt-
captin vulqi in England. It has been asserted by a
otter in that papCr,' and repeated by twenty others, that Mr.
‘Stat!nnell brought sixty votes from Ireland against Manners
4.e 'it, and that Mr. Abereromby is, consequently, the norm-
elee(t)f the Agitator. This is as true as it would be, had the
3 the
been. decided the other way, that. Sir Charles Sutton
that e nominee of Lord Stanley and his followers, because
candiedeac,eattie Reformer thought proper to vote for the Tory
nearly on Mr. O'Connell and the Noble Lord are prett3l-
teitY.°4 a par, in the numerical strength of their, persona, inft in the present Parliament. It is known that 0 Connell s
th uenee in Parliament is considerably diminished. Beyond
beersm sobers of his own family, there are not six Irishl 4.Meni-
liatnen acknowledge him as their leader. In the as. Par-
been hnti.,ll° ad many more, all the pledged Repealers having
ten& '' ominees. But nothing ean be more indisputably
bete'n, than the independence of the great body of Irish Li-
trMenibers now serving in Parliament. They are a far
413 tie ler order of men to the persons whom they displaced,
inlPthe sixty, who voted for Mr. Abercrnmby, forty at least
elaced, by' their character, above the suspiFion, even
tolitra °Pinion of an honourable adversary, of giving a vote
inditr rY to their own conviction, on a question of the merest
Poteerenee, at the suggestion of Mr. O'Connell. To sap-
oc that such men aS Musgrave, O'Ferrall, the Bellcws,
R.°ll°°r Don, Lord Acheson, Perrin, O'Loughlin, Wyse,
Timmswere influenced by Mr. O'Connell'.s judgment on
subject, would be preposterous. To assert it, as the
ittida"ei its respectable copyists have done, is to commit an
lihado °l's and fla.rant breach of truth, which has not even the
'filtrileriffalliskeeilliohoo:lo.d to redeem the slanderers from the charge
libi:atfj'ends of the Ministers are making a great pother.
of th '4le sincerity of their intentions, and call for a fair trial
iiikttete. 11.1easures which they will bring forward. To us it
hi*
bring
little, what may be the nature of the measures they
th 3.nt'ag forward. The men are enough for Ireland. Were
SieaC:st extensive reforms, consistent with the safety of the
tont"' to proceed from them, there never can be concord or
,Deedntment i !Ng of n Ireland, while the power shall
.rest in the
s faction practically tyrannical. The Ministers
fur
th well themselves (though few will give them credit even
Porte:ltta.), Lut the party in Ireland by which they are sup-
'lea kw" whom they confide, intend nothing but ?ppraeosd-
perieevraalice towards the people. They arc. harassing r
of
llefo,'Hig every man who dares to lift his voice in favouG
erkt"' and they are cherished and encouraed by the
the
ben while they do so. Of what use or comfort are
'then we Plausible assurances of the Prime Minister to us,
Ptrsee-e See the heartless exterminators of liberty, the fierce.
filvottrators of free opinion, selected as the objects of peculiar
othi, 4nd honoured with the confidence and delegated
.power
thstra t °verratent? These Tories may be Reformers int t
toziou°s,tobut ie effect every man, who breathes a
tsoerbiteunete,reimoies-
opprestim.spirit of Anti- Reform, feels them