The Sun.
London, England, 1835-09-18 00:00:00

30, STRAND,

ONNET.—By a Parisian Lady on her Entree
in London.
•
Translated from the French, and inscribed to Mr. Warren.
I've seen the dew-dro;) fall from high,
I've seen its influence on the flower;
I've ponder'd o'er its brilliancy,
And love its all-resplendent power;
And oft I've seen Golconda's gem
Glitter upon the diadem :
But ne'er saw I that beauteous bloom
That on my bright shoes here is set,
Nor thought I they could e'er assume
Such a refulgent glossy jet !
}or Warren's Blacking there displays
Beauty on which 1 ne'er had thought to gaze.
Then, Warren, take the praise of one
Whose best of wishes thou halt won.
This Easy shining and Brilliant Blacking, prepared by R OBE RT
WARREN, 30, Strand, London; and Sold In every Town in the
Kingdom.

Liquid, in Bottles, and Paste Blacking in Pots, at 6c1.-12d*,
aad 18d. each.
kW Be particular to inquire for Warren's, 30, Strand : All
others are counterfeit,

• r.
At the Lail. tit hales's, Sept. 11, 1835 ;
The King's Most Excellent Majesty in Coirficii,
sth and 6th William IV., c. 76, s. 140.
Whereas' dh Act passed in the fifth and sixth year of
his Majesty's reign, entitled Act to provide for the
regulatiBn municipal eufpovations in England and Wales,"
it was, iniithig things, enacted that it should be lawful
for his Majesty, it lie think 4t, by the advice of his
Privy Council, to order any days and times before the Ist
day.ef February next for doing the oefetal matters required
or authoriied b' the said Act to be done, in lieu of the
several days and tinieti fta the present year therein before
specified, or any of them ; and thet to such case all matters
ffientioned in such order should be doge a and within such
days arid tittle§ as should be mentioned respe6flt4y in that
behalf in such °MO; fie if the days and times menifOned in
such order had in every ititionee been mentioned in thd
said Act, instead of the days and thils thereinbefore re-
speetively mentioned in that behalf, and tiot otherwise ;
provided always, that nothing therein contained should
atithoriAo his Majesty to appoint any days or times other'
than were thereinbefore epeeified; for any matters required
or authorized by the said Act to be done, after the expira-
tion of this present year :
His Majesty is thereupon pleased, by the advice of his
Most Hon. Privy Council, in pursuance of the power vetted
in his Majesty by the said Act, to order, and it is hereby
ettlered, tes follows, that is to say :
Section IS, His Majesty, by the advice aforesaid, does
hereby order, that the overseers of the poor of every parish
wholly or in part within guy btlfthigh named in either of
the schedules (A) or (B) to the said Act annexed, shall
make out; and shall deliver to the towel-pleat of the bo-
rough, the burgele.list Recording to the provision§ of the
said Act, on the 7th day of November in this year, instead
of the sth day of September, as pitifided in the said Act •
and that the said overseers shall keep a itgiic copy of sucli
lists, to be perused by any person, without payrndig 4 any
fee, at all reasonable howl, between the said 7th day of
November and the 17th day of November in this year, in-
stead of the time between the sth and Milt days of Sep-
tember ; and that the town-clerk shall cause a copy of all
such lists to be fixed MI or near the outer-door of the town-
hall, or in some public and cotopicuous situation within the
borough, on every day during the week nest preceding the
17th day of November in this year, instead of the week
next preceding the .16th day, of September.
Section 17. And iii§ Majesty, by the advice aforesaid,
does hereby order, that every ilefsoYi whose name shall have
been omitted in any such burgess-MI, iinkt oho shall claim
to have his iidttte inserted therein, and every p'efsew autho-
rised by the same act to Okteet to any other person as; not
being entitled to have his name fetained in any burgess-Ikt,
shall g-ite such notice thereof respectively as fry the said Act is
reqUireci; Ott Or leek% the 17th November this y,ear, instead
of the 15th Of geptertrhet anti that the town-clerk of every
such borough shall coif e e6pieS of the lists to be made out
by him of all such persons SO eiaimi* so objected to,
according to the provisions of the said Act, to be fized on or
neaf the outer door of the town-hall, or in some public and
conspictiotis githation within such borough, during the eight
days next preceding thlSt day of December in this year,
instead of the eight days next pfeeeding the Ist day of Oc-
tober, and that the town-clerk shall likewise keep a copy of
the namei el ell the persons so claiming as aforesaid, and
also a copy of the Hint, of all persons so objected to as
aforesaid, to be perused by any pereori, without payment of
any fee, at all reasonable hours during tin eight days (Sun-
day excepted) next preceding the Ist day of December in
this year, instead of the eight days (Sunday excepted) next
preceding the lst day of October,
Sections 18, 20.—And his Majesty, by the advice afore-
said, does hereby order, that the barristers to be appointed
to revise the lists of burgesses of the said borotighs, ac-
cording to the- provisions of the said. Act, shall hold their
courts as directed by the said Act, for the purpose of re-
vising the paid burgess-lists as some time between the Ist
day of December inclusive and the 15th day of December
inclusive in this year, instead of the time between the Ist
day of October inclusive and the lbth day of October in-
clusive.
Section 22.—And his Majesty, by the advice aforesaid,
does hereby order, that the town-clerk of every such borough
shall cause the burgess-roll of the burgesses of such borough
to be completed on or before the 22d day of December in
this year, instead of causing it to be completed on or before
the 22d day of October.
Section 30.--And his Majesty, by the advice aforesaid,
does hereby order, that the counsellors of every such bo-
rough shall be elected, according to the provisions of the said
Act, on the 26th day of December in this year, instead of
the Ist day of November.
Section 25.—And his Majesty, by the advise aforesaid,
does hereby order, that the aldermen of every such borough
, g
shall be elected accordin to e provisions of the said Act,
on the 31st day of December ithn this year, instead of the 9th
day of November.
aforesaid,Section sd4o9ea, 6holr,ob6advice
y 9. order,— A ndt
hist
eajfiersstty' by
quarterlythe
meet-
ing of the council of every such borough shall be holden at
noon, on the Ist day of January in the year 1836, instead of
the 9th day of November in this year ; and that the mayor
of every such borough shall be elected, according to the
provisions of the said Act, on the said Ist day of January,
instead of the said 9th day of November ; and that the
sheriff to be appointed in any such borough, according to the
provisions of the said Act, shall be appointed accordingly
on the said Ist day of January, instead of the Ist day of
.Noi•ember in this year.
C. C. GREVILLE.

THE REGISTRATIONS.

CITY OF LONDON.
(Continued from The San of yesterday.)

On the list of the Fishmongers' Company being handed in,
The claim of Sir John Gurney, one of the Barons of the
Court of Exchequer, a member of the Company, was ob-
jected to by
Mr. Trott, on the ground that Sit Julin Gurney, as one
of the Barons of the Court of Exchequer, WO necessarily
connected with the management of the revenue, the ex-
cise, and customs. The Act 22d. George 111., cap. 41,
sec. 1, provided, " That from and after the ist day of Au-
gust, 1782, no commissioner, collector, gauger, or other
officer, or person whatsoever, concerned or employed in the
charging, collecting, levying, or managing the duties of ex-
cise, or any branch or part thereof, nor any commissioner,
collector, comptroller, searcher, or other officer or person
whatsoever concerned or employed in the charging, collect•
ing, levying, or managing the customs, or any branch or
part thereof, shall be capable of giving his vote for the
election of any Knight of the Shire, commissioner, citizen,
burgess, or Baron, to serve in Parliament for any county,
stcwardry, city, borough, or cinque port."
Mr. Towse, the Clerk of the Fishmongers' Company,
supported the claim of the Learned Baron.
Mr. TAMLYN was of opinion, upon referring to the sec-
tion which had been quoted of the Act, that it was not the
intention of the Legislature to exclude any higher offices
than Commissioners. He believed this was the first attempt
at such "high game" as the Judges.
Mr. Trott reminded the Court, that at the last election
those learned persons had all gone to the poll in a body and
voted one Way.

Mr. TAMLYN had said on a former occasion that they
had nothing to do with politics there. He felt bound to
decide against the objection ; first, because the Act of Par-
liament did not, in his opinion, extend to Judges ; and, se-
condly, because he did not think a Baron of the Exchequer
was in any way connected with " charging, collecting, levy-
ing, or managing" the revenue.
The lists of the Fletchers' Company, the Founders, the
Framework Netters, then passed without objection.
On the Girdlers' Company being handed up for revision,
Mr. Trott, on the part of Mr. Heppel, objected to the
claim of William Morgan, of No. 3, Pope's Head-alley,
Cornhill, on the ground that the residence given was not
the usual residence, nhich was at Colney Hatch, and conse-
quently more than seven statute miles from any of the poll-
ing booths.
Mr. Childe, the clerk of the Company, supported the
claim, on the ground that occupation -under the .Reform
Bill was intended to signify a place of residence.
Mr. TAMLYN was of opinion that residence and occupa-
tion, under that part of the Reform Act regulating the re-
gistration, were distinct things. He would give judgment
to-morrow.
The Court then adjourned
The lists of the Glass-sellers, the Glaziers, the Glovers,
, and the Lorimers.' Cornpanicol
the Goldsmiths, the Gold and Silver Wire Drawers, the
Haberdashers, tbe HornQrs, the Innholders, the Leather-
sellers
foti wr erp,eo :eh; n, severally
handed in and passed.
until ten
at _
o'clock this day.

On taking his -soul this
COMMON mr,f.S.
perhaps it would morning, Mr. 011AIG said that
bP as w(31) fOr ftate, that, havit)g

I looked over the list of clauses and oiti2'jettionS, .r he found
it uve4l he impossible to get beyond lett& A to-day.
Mr. Roweroft, a gentleman who attended W watch the
proceedings on the part of the Conservative interest, otated
that he had caked notices to be served on all the over-
seers to attend and produce their rate-books, &c. Twice
as troleh business might have been got through yesterday,
if the rate-hooks had been in Court.
Mr. Craig doubted whether he had the power to compel
the attendance of the tax-collectors.
In the case of Messrs. Gooch and Le Mair, mentioned
yesterday, Mr. Craig this morning decided that they had
not made good their claim to have their names inserted on
the registry.
Mr. John Telford's claim, which occupied the attention
of the Court on the preceding day for a considerable time,
was the next considered. It had been postponed in order
to afford the opportunity of proving the residence from
which he claimed to be rated.
Mr. Telford was himself examined, and proved his occu-
pancy of the house in Star-court, for which he had paid all
ihe :last year's rates. The overseer admitted this, and the
fact also :_topeared by the rate books ; but 'it was not shown
by the entries for what description of property the rate bad
been paid.
""1 that under the 27th section of
Mr. ilowcroft conten,
ot be allowed.
the Reform Act the claim :quid p
other side that the claim
Mr. Sharpe contended on the
could nut be disputed, and that Ow general description
In the parish, was
given in the rate book,• of " property
quite sufficient to establish it. pn the
The Barrister said that he would give jud
point of law to-morrow (this) morning.
The claims of Messrs. Thompson and Marryatt—vrel*
disallowed, as the parties did not appear either in person or
send any person to represent them, in order that the objec-
tions to them might be answered.
Several other claims were annulled for similar causes, and
several names were also struck off the list, who were repre-
sent by Mr. Rowcroft, but who did not attend when their
personal testimony was requisite.
The next claim which was considered was that of Mr.
William Clarke, who claimed to be rated for the premises
No. 04, Great Tower-street. The claimant was himself
examined, and stated'that he claimed from those premises,
which he occupied as a counting-house and warehouse in
July last, but he had not paid any rates there, as there were
riot any due at the time. He had occupied the premises
for twelve months, and resided within seven miles of the
city.. He had served notice of his claim on the overseers.
The rates last due had been paid by the landlord before
claimant claimed.
The overseer proved that there had been one rate made
between September, 1834, and July, 1835, and that was in
January, 1835 ; and it also appeared that this rate was paid
ism March for the premises, but the name of Mr. Clarke did
wit appeaton the rate books.
• Mt, CRAIG decided that as all the other requisite provi-
sions of the Act„ bat-been complied with, and as no rates
were due at the time the claim of Mr. Clarke was made, no
tender was necessary, as the non-appearance of the name
of the claimant on the books was provided for by the
30th section of the Act, when occurring from the negli-
gence of the overseers. He would therefore admit the
claim of Mr. Clarke.
The Court adjourned at a quarter past four o'clock.

MIDDLESEX.
The Revising Barristers sat yesterday at the Black Dog,
Bedfont, to pursue the revision of the lists for the county of
Middlesex.
On the Barristers entering the Court,
Mr. C. F. Ady begged for a moment to call the attention
of the Court to a difference of opinion which it appeared had
influenced the judgment of the Learned Gentlema.:, and
produced conflicting decisions. He alluded to cases in wijch
claimants held under more than one landlord. In the cast
of the Messrs. Ashby, of Isleworth, Mr. Coventry had de-
cided that their claim was good, although they held under
three landlords, and in the case of Mr. Jeffs, of New Brent-
ford, who held under more than one landlord, Mr. Martin
had decided that the claim was bad. This he learned by
the report which appeared in the newspapers, and he begged
respectfully to request the attention of the Court to it, as it
was evidently most desirable that the course of decision
should be uniform.
The Barristers having consulted for a short time,
Mr. COVENTRY said Mr. Ady was rather in error in sup-
posing 'that the case of Ashby had been decided on the
ground stated ; but that was a matter of no importance.
He thought the Act should be liberally construed, and he
was disposed to admit claims, IC good in other respects, in
which there was more than one la,:dlord.
Mr. MARTIN said he certainly had decided on a dif-
ferent principle. Feeling that conformity was most desi-
rable, he was ready to adopt the view of his Learned Col-
league, especially as it went to enlarge, and not to restrict,
the franchise.
The parishes in the district were then thus divided :
Mr. Coventry to take Staines, Hampton Wick, Littleton,
Latcham, Stanwell, Harlington, and Ashford.
Mr. Martin to take Hampton-town, Feltham, Hanworth,
Harizen, Isleworth, Sunbury, Teddington, Shepperton,
Cranford, Walton-upon-Thames, and Bedfont.
The general result of the investigation was as follows :
OBJECTIONS.
Overseers. Conservative. Radical.
Parishes. Object. Expung. Object. Expung. Object. Expung.
Staines
Hanwell
Hampton Wick ... 1
Sunbury 0
Hampton ........,. 0
Hanscorth
Harmondsworth... 0
Shepperton
Bedfont
Harlington
0 6 35 19 34 11
In the case of the parish of Teddington, Mr. Field, as
the agent of the " Reform Club," made as strong an appeal
as he could to induce a total disfranchisement. In Ted-
dington there were thirty-eight claimants, and although no
one objection had been taken, the " Reform Club" con-
tended that the parish ought to be disfranchised in lots,
because the overseers had been guilty of some technical
irregularity in posting the lists. The Barristers, however,
adopted the list.
The Hammersmith district will be taken this day at the
Sussex Arms, and the number
,of objections to be investi-
cr 1 crated is 526.