The Sun.
London, England, 1832-03-13 00:00:00

TO THE lIONREL: TURD MARI.: FOR TILE CITY OFLONDEN.

" A ginuine statmen of the crule tretement of me Mrs Brown,
whose sperits has hen much affected—and who gos in Bodily fear
of her life. Mrs. Brown have once snore agin to apply to the
Lord Mare for the City for 'pertekshon as I am so malicious
anoyad, the anoyance i hay met Is men singin round my house,
poetry made by Bill Townes, wich I take the liberty in presentin
to your Lordship. My lord a parson can be brot forrard to swear
as those men ware employ'd by Mrs. Wayman for to sing the
poetry—and ware to have monument of live shilling from her for
so doing."

Whit is your charge against Mrs. Wayman, said his
Lordship? Mrs Brown—l charge her with enciting
conquest of more than 300 people about my door on
Saturday, and obstructing my passage in sitch a way—
that my husband cant get in and out as he used to do_.
the people relit all day lestneng to two men as shed pail
to sing a song, which shed got wrote on me. Here's a
copy, your Lordship (viz. some foolish dogrel, respecting
her former appearance at the Mansion-house) :
What is the reason, Mrs. Brown, inquired his Lord-
ship, that you have these disturbances with your neigh-
bours ?—Why, please your Lordship, I must tell you the
truth :—When I had a little property left me a few
months ago, me and my husband told our neighbours
we should have no more acquaintance with low people,
because we considered ourselves in quite another different
sort of speck. And ever rince they have acted this way,
because I can't make 'em my equal?
A little charity-boy was here brought forward, and
pointed out as the author of the verses above.

Ills Loanstur inquired of •he boy if it were true ?—The
young bantling of Apollo, who was dressed in leathern
breeches, and was hiding his face in his muffin-cap, ac-
knotvledged that he hod perpetrated the poetry in ques-
tion at the request of the defendant.
His LORDII-11 then asked if he had employed himself
before in making verses ?—The boy acknowledged with
some reluctance, that it was not his first offence : he
added that he was nearly fourteen, and that he was in the
charity-school of Sir John Cassey.
Mr. Nobler recommended the boy not to employ his ta-
lent in future in matters which might prove mischievous.
After a good deal of talk between the complainant and
the defendant, which had any other effect than that of
elucidating the matter, the LORD Mitvoit dismissed the
charge, observing, as the complainant bad not proved her
case, she must lose the costs.
_ GUIDLHALL.
- •

William Dorking and William Davis were brought
up for reexamination, on suspicion of having stolen a
corpse of an elderly man.
Davis was carrying the body in a hamper to St Bartho-
lomew's hospital, and when he was stopped Dorkin inter-
fered in a way that showed he was a companion.
Earl, the constable, reported, that an owner had not
been found for the corpse, which had therfore been opened
by two surgeons, and the examination satisfying them the
death had not been caused by any unfair means, and they
basing certified that it was from a natural cause, the body
had been interred. . .

-
Dorkin knew nothing about the matter, and asked if
any one could say he had carried the hamper.
The constable allowed that he did not interfere with the
hamper, but after Davis was stopped, Durkin urged him
to let the subject pass, as !they were poor men, and he
swore it had not been burked, so help him God.

Barker, a watchman, said Dorkin followed the hamper
some time before it was stopped.

Dorkin declared this wa;false.

Davis had mere'y acted as porter. He was hired at the
Bull-inn, Aldgate, by a man who ran away when the body
was stopped.
Mr. Arnold, of Smithfield, begged to be permitted to
deny that he had knowledge of the affair, although the
resurrection man had taken the liberty of tacking his ad-
dress on the hamper. This had been done to lull suspicion,
and to account fur going towards the hospital, his house
being next door to the gates.
Mr. Alderman ANSLEY did not think there was suffi •
cient ground to hold Dorkiu to bail, and he therefore dis-
charged him, but he remanded the other prisoner, to make
some further inquiry.
BOW STREET.
Information was forwarded to this office a few days
ago respecting a gang of swindlers residing in Lambeth,
who carried on a profitable trade by means of begging
letters. A gentleman, from whom the information pro-
ceeded, produced a letter which he had received from a
nobleman residing in the country, enclosing a memorial
stating that a Mrs. Mary Upfold, residing in Lambeth-
walk, was in a state of the deepest distress, having three

BIRTHS.
On the 11th inst. at Brentford, the lady of R. T. Fletcher,
Esq., of a daughter.
On the 10th inst. at Clapton, Mrs. Samuel P. Child, of a son.