The Sun.
London, England, 1835-07-15 00:00:00

tHE SUN, LONDON, WEDNESDAY, JULY 15, 1835.

• aces in the various Colleges of Oxford. He contended,
therefore, that there was no ground for the complaint as stated'
in the preamble of the Bill, and there was no ground for Par.
liamentary interference by means of a Bill like the present.
Would any man tell him that he believed, after this Bill passed,
that the public would not understand that the meaning of it
was to proceed against the institutions of the Church of Eng-
land 2--( Hear, hear.) It was impossible that this should not
be believed. The measure itself was apparent on the face of
it, although it merely stated that the Articles of the Church
should be signed at a more advanced age. Noble Lords, how-
ever, must know that the Bill was not effectual for the purpose
which was contended for. It extended to other views : those
who attentively considered the measure would perceive that
the great object of it was to inflict a blow on the University of
Oxford, and against the interests of the Church.--( Hear,
hear.) Under these circumstances he felt that it was a mea-
sure that the House should not adopt, and he earnestly re-
commended their Lordships to vote for the amendment of the
Most Reverend Prelate. . _

The Earl of RADNOR shortly replied; but the greater
part of the Noble Earl's remarks were inaudible in the Gal-
lery. We understood the Noble Earl to say, that if the
Universities persisted in making the Pupils subscribe the Ar-
ticles, they ought, at any rate, to state the circumstances of
each case ; for instance, that one lad was aged twelve years,
and understood them ; another aged fourteen, and did not ; a
third aged sixteen, and had not read them ; and so on. This
would not be liable to the objections the present mode was
open to. The original object of having tests was to exclude
the Roman Catholics from the Universities. At the time
they were enforced, a number of Catholics were secretly
living in the Universities, and yet were not directly con-
nected with any of the Colleges. The tests were first intro-
duced in 1681. He would not detain the House longer ; but
he protested against the interpretation put on the Bill by the
Noble Duke. . .

Lord MELBOURNE wished to say a few words in ex-
planation of what had previously fallen from him. He did
not intend to express any disapprobation of the Thirty-nine
Articles. He thought, considering the time they were drawn,
that they embraced much that was excellent and wise, but at
the same time they contained much which he could not help
thinking was unnecessary in the present day. For instance,
in one of them it was denied that it was a doctrine of Chris-
tians to have a community of goods ; in another it was asserted
that the magistrate had a right to punish for civil offences ; and
in a third, that it was lawful to go to war. These opinions it
might be necessary to insert in the Articles at the time they
were framed; but it did not appear to him to be necessary to
retain them. With these exceptions he thought they were
excellent, and were drawn up with great prudence, wisdom,
and moderation.
The Duke of RICHMOND merely wished to say a very
few words in explanation of the reasons which would induce
him to wait for the second reading of the Bill. He was anxious
to do so to prevent any misapprehension arising as to the mo-
tives which induced him to pursue the course he intended to
follow. He denied that this Bill, if passed, could be con-
strued into an attack on the Church establishment of the coun-
try or the Thirty-nine Articles. If he thought so he would
not support it, but he felt that it was absurd to call upon the
youth at the Universities to subscribe to the articles of the
Church before be could be aware of their nature.—( Hear. )
He was an advocate for the admission of the Dissenters to the
Universities, because he believed that by their being sent there
it was probable that many of them would be converted to what,
in his conscience, he believed to be the true faith, namely, that of
the Protestant Church of England.—( Hear, hear.) He vs',,s
was of opinion that there should be some tests as regarded the
tutors, but none to be taken by the pupils. He thought if the
Bill went into Comnaittee that his Noble Friend would find
that the second clause of it required some amendment. I:e
thought that great caution should be taken as to the tutors
appointed in the Universities.
Their Lordships then divided.
Contents present
Non-contents present B5
Contents proxies ...
Non-contents proxies

Total contents
Yen-contents

. 167

Majority against the second reading
The Bills brought up from the Commons were severally
read a first time, and the House adjourned at Ten o'clock.

LIST OF THE MINORITY
Of 97 (Tellers included) who voted in favour of Mr. Gisborno's
motism for the re-appointment of the Committee to inquire into
the Claims of the Baron de Bode.
Against the Motion . •.. 179
97 82 Majority.
For it

Number

Attwood, M.
Attwood, T.
Balfour, T.
Baillie, Joseph
Baring, H. B.
Barnard, E. G.
Bellew, Sir P.
Bellew, R. M.
llackburne, J.
Blackstone, W. S.
Blake, B. J.
Blamire, W.
Bowes, J.
Bridgman, Hewitt
Brownrigg, J. S.
Bruce, Lord E.
Buckingham, J. S.
Buller, C.
butler, Hon. P. S.
Ca) CY, E S.
ChaWon, E. L.
ChicliesiCr, J. P. B.
Clayton, Sir %V.
Crawford, W.
Deno istoun, A WV.
Elphinstone, H.
Euston, Earl of
Fergusson, Sir A. C.
Ferguson, R.
Finn, W. F.
alskell, D.

LIST
On t

Agnew, Sir A.
Arbuthnot, Hon. H.
A t twood , M.
Balfour, T.
Calctaft, G. H.
Campbell, Sir H.
Chisholm, A.
Cole, Lord
Darlington, Earl of
Dick, Q.
Dottin, Abel Rous
Egerton, Sir P.
Elley, Sir .1.
Vector, John Minet
Finch, G.
Forbes, W.

in the House.... 276
Gillon, W. D.
Grattan, H.
Grote, G.
Gully, J.
Hall, B.
Hamilton, Lord C.
Hawkins J. H.
Heathcote, R. E.
Howard, P. H.
Hoy, J. B.
Lewis, D
Long, W.
Longfield, R.
Lister, E. C.
Lynch, A. H.
M'Cance, John
Maher, John
Marjoribanks, S.
Marsiand, H.
Marshall, W.
Martin, T.
Morrison, J.
O'Csunell, J.
O'Connor Don
Parker. J.
Patt !son, Janie,
Pease, Jo4eph
Pendarves, E. W.
Pigot, H.
Poxonby, J G. B.
RamOlottom, J.

Raphael, Sheriff
Richards, J.
Ronayne. D.
Rundle, John
Russell, Lord
Scholefield, J.
Sheil, It. L.
Sheldon, E. R. C.
Strutt, E.
Stuart, Lord D. C.
Stuart, Lord James
Talfourd, T. Noon
Thornely, Thomas
Trelawney, Sir W.
Trench, Sir Frederick
Trevor. Hon. A.
Tulk, Charles A.
Vigors, N. C.
Wakley, Thomas
Walker, C. A.
Wallace, R.
Walpole, Lord
Warburton, H.
Wilde, Thomas
Wilts, J.
Williams, W. A.
William. W.
Wood, Alderman
TELLERS.
Ewart, W.
tiisborne, 'F.

OF 7'IIE MINORITY
:he Irish Education Grant.
Gordon, Hon. W. Pringle, A.
Greville, Sir C. J. Scarlett, H. C.
Hamilton, Lord C. sibthorp, Colonel
Hardy, J. Sinclair, G.
Hayes, Sir E. Smyth, Sir G. H., 13
Jackson, J. D. Tyrrell, Sir J.
Inglis, Sir R. H. William, K.
Kearsley, J. H Wyndham, W.
Kirk, P. Young, J.
Lefroy, Pr. T. TELLER.
Lefroy, A. Plumptre, J. P.
Longfield, K PAIRED OFF.
Lowther, H. C. Buller, Sir J. 13. Y.
Maxwell, M. Cole, Hon. A.
Plunkett, tion. K. Cooper, E. J.
Price, Samuel Gnve Perceval, Colon I

Some workmen employed in enlarging a doorway iii
that part of the Tower of London called " Rufus's Tower,"
discovered at some depth beneath the foundation a vault com-
pletely filled with the bones of various animals. It did not,
however, appear that there were any human bones with them.
UNION-HALL.—Yesterday William Hughes, a la-
bouring man, apparently between 40 and 50 years of age, seas
brought before Mr. Traill, charged with an assault, with in-
tent to commit a rape, on Bridget Roderick, a maiden female
in the 84th year of her age. The prisoner was remanded.
TURTLE SOUP.—Turtles often become emaciated
and sickly before they reach this country, in which case the
soup would be incomparably improved by leaving out the turtle,
and substituting a good calf's head.—Mirror.
It is related of a celebrated French cook, who had
been in the service of the late Marquis of Abercorn, that lie
refused to accompany the Duke of Richmond to Ireland, with
a salary of 4001. per annum, on learning that there was not
any Italian Opera in Dublin.
We learn from our Liverpool Correspondent, that
the Bishop of Ferns died on Sunday last, at the Waterloo
HotM, in that town. According to the Irish Church Tempo-
ralities Act, the bishopric of Ferns is one to which the
bishopric of Ossory, had it become first vacant, was to be
united ; but Ferns itself being first vacant, the Bishop of Os-
sory becomes, by virtue of that Act, Bishop of Ferns ; so that
the Ministers will not have any church patronage to bestow on
the present occasion.—Morning Paper.
CITY, TUESDAY EVENING.—The determination
expressed by the Chancellor of the Exchequer last night in
the House of Commons, to eti:Jalise the duty upon teas, has
given great satisfaction to the trads. to-day. It is estimated
that the loss to the Government by the restrictions placed on
the trade, the introduction of low priced tet:_g from China, and
-,,•
frauds and erroneous charges upon the several rades of tea,
not less
amounts already, since the opening of the trade,
than one quarter of a million sterling. The sales of p;livate
trade teas were continued to-day, and the quantities sold oi)-
tained full prices. A good deal, however, was bought in, the
holders anticipating higher rates. The sales will not conclude
yet for some days.—Morning Advertiser.
So numerous are the applications made daily to
Colonel de Lacy Evans for appointments in the legion now
raising for the service of the Queen of Spain, that he was
yesterday obliged officially to announce that he cannot receive
any applications from gentlemen who have never previously
served, for the next ten days to come.
Yesterday an inquest was held at the Royal
Sta.ndard, Star-street, Edgware-road, before Mr. Stirling, on
the body of Mrs. Mary Veale, aged 49. It appeared from the
evidence that the deceased was the wife of a respectable trades-
man residing in the Edgware-road, and the mother of a large
family. On Saturday morning she left home, accompanied by
a servant, in perfect health, and arrived at the Gloucester
coffee-house, Piccadilly, in a hackney coach, preparatory to
proceeding by stage to the country, when she was suddenly
seized with a fit, and before the arrival of a surgeon was 1
corpse.—Verdict, " Died by the visitation of God."
CHEAP TRAVELLING.—S 0 excessively have the
fares by steam-vessels been reduced, that it is calculated some
o fthe north-country steamers convey passengers at less than
oue farthing per mile ! It will be long ere steam-travelling
by land exceed this.—Mechanics' Magazine.
A decrepid old man, upwards of ninety years of
age, named Robert Jones, stands committed to our gaol for
.trial, capitally charged with perpetrating a rape on Harriet
Powell.—Shrewsbury Chronicle.
14. k. letter has been addressed by Mr. Ewart, to the
Secretary of the Liverpool Mechanics' Institute, stating the in-
tention of Lord Brougham to visit Liverpool, according to the
invitation of the Committee reported yesterday in The Sun.
Saturday morning the youngest daughter of Francis
Dunbar, Esq., of Baker-street, Portman-square, attempted to
terminate her existence by swallowing laudanum, but by timely
discovery a surgeon succeeded in extracting the whole of the
ison. The young lady is about 17 years of age, and had
beben, for some unexplained cause, ir. a state of dejection se-
veral days.

LONDON,
WEDNESDAY EVENING, JULY la, 1835.

The Duke of WELLINGTON and Sir ROBERT
PEEL were both characteristically occupied last night,
the one advocating the cause of religious intolerance
in the Lords', and the other, that of political intole-
rance in the Commons'. The former strongly opposed
the admission of Dissenters to the Universities ; the
latter was equally zealous in endeavouring to bolster
np the rotten parts of the elective system. The same
fierce, bigotted spirit of anti-reform was at work in
both cases, with this difference in the mode of its dis-
play;—namely, that where the Duke was positive, the
Baronet was evasive. Of the two intolerants, there-
fore, we prefer his Grace ; for candour and manliness,
even when misdirected, are to be held in respect ;
whereas a tortuous, crooked line of policy never
did, and never can, inspire any other feeling
than sheer contempt. The heaviest charge we bring
against the Duke is that of an utter incapacity
to read aright the signs of the times. While every
one else sees that high Toryism is fast setting in the
`,l'est, he is still looking to the East, as if convinced
that ii has yet to attain its meridian. Facts which
convince otii;.'rs pass him unregarded. Though the
Dissenters are thui:fiering at the gates of the Univer-
sities, with an intelligent :Ltai ority of their countrymen
to back them, he still insists that clamor they make,
is the mere paltry whisper of a faction. Though he
sees them with the brand, burned in by big6....`rv, on
their foreheads, he yet cannot be brought to conceive
that they have any wrongs to be redressed. Hence
his opposition last night to Lord RADNOR'S motion
for the second reading of the " Act prohibiting sub-
scription to the 39 Articles in certain cases," which
proceeded on the principle that the Dissenters had
little or nothing to complain of; while, by acceding to
their unreasonable demands, the Universities, and with
them the Protestant religion, would receive a wound
from which, most probably, neither would recover.
The Duke is a great master of Canon law, but we
must protest against his logic in this instance. If the
Established Religion is ever destined to suffer, it will
be, not from acceding to, but from denying, the just
claims of the Dissenters. It is strong only in the cause
of common sense and equity. When it abandons this
high 'vantage-ground, it becomes

" Weak as is a woman's tear,
And helpless as unshelter'd infancy."

Some superficial reasoners may possibly suppose
that the majority of 106 against Lord RADNOR'S
motion, is a proof of the triumphant influence of the

High Church party. We look on it in a different
light. We regard it as the sure forerunner of their
declining authority ; for it will convince the people
that they have nothing now to hope for from a set of
intolerants, who, impervious to argument, and blinded
by prejudice, are resolved only to consult their own
selfish interests. Had common sense been allowed to
exercise her legitimate influence last night, the majority
would have been 106 in favour of, instead of against,
the Dissenters. But the Episcopal Bench interposed
its veto, and the result was just such as might have
been anticipated. It gives us pleasure to state that the
Duke of RICHMOND was among the supporters of
Lord RADNOR'S motion. However mistaken his
Grace may be on some points, he has still sagacity
enough to see the absurdity of compelling young men
to subscribe to that which not one out of a hundred
can understand. Of the Thirty-nine Articles there
are at least one-half that might embarrass the digestion
of an ostrich. How, then, can a rational being be
expected to swallow and digest them ?

The debate which took place last night on Mr.
WA soN's motion for referring to a Select Committee
the petitions from Great Yarmouth, possesses consi-
derable interest. The petitioners state that to their
certain knowledge two guineas a head were given
to many of the voters at the last election by a
noted partizan of the sitting Members, and they pray
that the House would inquire into the case, and
bring the parties guilty of such gross bribery to con-
dign punishment. This, one would have supposed,
was so reasonable a request, that it would have been
granted as a matter of course. But Sir ROBERT
PEEL and Mr. PRAED think otherwise. The latter
of these gentlemen, in one of those speeches of which
it may, without a solecism, be said that they are full
of emptiness, opposed the motion, not because the al-
legations contained in the petitions. were false, but be-
cause they did not affect his seat, and therefore did
not come properly under the cognizance of the House !
According to this doctrine, a constituency may be rot-
ten to the core—every elector in such dens of corrup-
tion as Yarmouth, may receive the wages of infamy
with impunity, provided the crime cannot be brought
home to the sitting Member I

The Right Hon. Baronet took a different line of de-
fence. He resisted the proposed inquiry because he
suspected the genuineness of the petition ; one man
having signed several times. It was stated also that the
Right Hon. Gentleman's own name, and that of the
Hon. and Learned Member for Dublin, were to be
found more than once in the petition. This objection
is quite untenable. It is well known that the Tories
often resort to the shabby trick of forging signatures to
the petitions of the Reformers, for the purpose of
throwing discredit on them, while their own petitions
are doubly guarded from such interpolations—first by
the principles of the Reformers, and next by the
cautious secrecy with which they are got up.

The Right Hon. Baronet's other objection was al-
together technical. The petitions, he said, were not
presented within the appointed time.
Lord JOHN RUSSELL made an admirable reply.
He forcibly pointed out the gross injustice which
would be done if after the repeated attempts which he
had made to get a law passed for preventing bribery
had been defeated by the Lords, the House of Commons
should be precluded from investigating a charge so se-
rious as this, brought forward, too, by nearly a fourth
part of the constituency of Yarmouth. Such a
charge, the Noble Lord observed, if made by 10 in-
stead of 350 electors, ought to be enquired into, were
it only to support the dignity of the House.

The House divided on the motion, which was carried
by 186 to 132. We rejoice at this decision. As
the House has refused to concede to the people the
protection afforded by the Ballot, it is bound to let no
opportunity pass of showing its determination to check
corruption by other means.

We have just cast a hasty glance at a pamphlet en-
titled " We Can't Afford It," by ISAAC TONIKINS,
which advocates the necessity of further reforms, and of
the people beginning themselves to look shrewdly after
their own interests, in a style and with a spirit far supe-
rior to the general run of such productions. Whoever
be the author, he is one not less distinguished by his
sound sense, than by his powers of sarcasm. The whole
gist of his pamphlet is to insist that " there is no more
money to be had ; that we must do with low salaries,
and few of them ; small armies, and a good armed
police ; a decent Court, and a cheap one ; few colo-
nies, and these keeping themselves. All this is the peo-
ple's right ; all this, aye, every bit of it, the people must,
and they will have." The writer is also of opinion
that the elective qualification must be lowered—that,
in short, Reform must be on the move ; and that, if
Ministers be really desirous of continuing to stand
well with the country, they must at once throw down
the gauntlet of defiance to the Tories. There are
some few crude remarks in this pamphlet to which we
object ; but the majority are excellent in their tone,
being recommended by boldness, strait-forwardness,
and independence. The aristocracy will wince a little
at them—for the writer is no superstitious respecter of
rank, unaccompanied by intelligence and moral worth—
but the people will read them with delight.

The most remarkable fact communicated in the
French Journals of Monday, is the escape on Satur-
day night of thirty-nine of the Paris prisoners, who
were confined in St. Pelagic, preparatory to their
being brought to trial before the Court of Peers.
The way in which they effected their escape, was
by cutting a subterraneous passage under the walls of
the prison, which led into a garden near the Rue
Copeau. The number of the accused confined in the
prison of St. Pelagie was forty-four, but five of them
refused to use any effort to evade the execution of the
law, although they did not consider themselves bound
to discover the designs of their fellow-prisoners. Of
the five who remained, one is the Editor of
the Reformateur Journal, and two more are writers in
it. When the escape of the prisoners was made known
to the police, considerable consternation was exhibited
by these functionaries, lest the Government might sus-
pect them of culpable neglect, if not of aiding the
prisoners in their flight. Accordingly, to remove such
an impression, large detachments of them scoured the
suburips of Paris in every direction, and early on Monday
in re-capturing five of the fugitives.
they had succeedZfl
ao mpch of the telegraphic de-
We gave yesterday
spatch received from Bayonne, by the French Go-
vernment, as announced the safe arrival of the
English auxiliaries at St. Sebastian on Monday.
We have now to add that they were received by the
inhabitants with manifestations of public rejoicing, and
that the garrison vied with the populace in a cordial
reception of them. The report that Don CARLOS
had appointed MORENO to succeed ZUMA.LACAR.
REGUI in the command of the insurgents is confirmed.

The Messager of Monday has the following article,
upon which we shall offer no comment :
" At last the Quotidienne lets out the great secret. Louis
Philippe having very lately concurred openly in the abolition
of the Salic laws of Spain, it results from the abolition (whe-
ther it be consummated or not), that the House of Orleans
annulled on its part, and as far as it is concerned, the sti-
pulation of the family compact, and of the tre4ty of Utrecht ;
and if Don Cacios were expelled from Spain, he would na-
turally go to Prague, tp resume his rank in the Muse of
1301,00 n, Now it is notorious that this rank is that of a de.

scendant of Louis XIV., in a direct line, whereas the branch
of Orleans descends only from a brother of the great King.
" Don Carlos, King of France 1 Here is something to
obtain partisans for legitimacy I"
The same journal says :
The accounts of the cholera from Toulon are very de-
plorable. On the 6th and 7th there were 152 new cases, and
144 deaths ; the total up to the 7th is 446 cases, and 289
deaths. It is reported that the Magistrates have discovered
that a band of malefactors (said to be 200 in number) have
conspired to plunder the houses of the persons who have fled
from the city.
The Court of France has consented to a marriage be-
tween Prince LEOPOLD of Naples, and the Princess
MARIA of Orleans.

FRENCH FUNDS -nate, JULY 13.
Five per Cents., 109 f. 108 f. 95c. 109 f. sc.
Four per Cents., 29E 25c.
Three per Cents., 79£ 79f. 95c. 79f. sc.
Bank Actions, 2,070 E 2,065 E 2,050 E
Rente de Naples, 97E 97E 15c. 10c.
Roman Five per Cents., 101 1005.
Rente d'Espagne, Five per Cents., 40;39%.
Rente d'Espagne, Three per Cents., 27 267 i.
Royal Spanish Loan, 44
Bente Perpet. d'Espagne, Five per Cent., 41')( 41 41%%U.
Belgian Loan, Five per Cents, 1011 i.
Portuguese Loan, Five per Cents., 90.
Ditto, Three per Cents, 61.
Haytian Loan, 385 E
EICIIANGE ON LONDON.
One month, paper, -f..-c. ; money. 25f. 47%c.
Three months, paper, 25f. 35c. ; money, 25f. 32l c.
Authenlieue.
BOURSE, THREE O'CLOCE.-The market has been flat ever
since yesterday. At Tortoni's the price has been at 79f. 10c.
On 'Change it dropped to 78f. 95c. ; but has since improved
to 79f. sc. Very little business is doing. The Spanish
funds are flat, scarcely any thing being done in them.
Another improvement has taken place at the close of the
market in the 3 per Cents.
QUARTER TO FOUR. -- Five per Cents., 109 f. 10c. ;
Three per Cents., 79f. 20c. ; Five per Cents. Spanish, 41 ;
Three per Cents., Spanish, 26+; Cortes, 39i; Coupons, 21 ;
Guebhards, 44 ; Differes, 16+; New Loan, 50 ; Definitives,
-; Actives, 47+; Passives, 13+; Ducats, 97 20; Romans,
101+; Belgians, 1011; Pedros, 90 ; Miguels, -; Dutch, _ ;
Haytian, 385 ; Brabant Bank, -.

Adviccs from Madrid to the sth inst. have been re-
ceived this morning. The REGENT has published a
decree for the suppression of the Order of Jesuits in
Spain, and another for the abolition of the Juntas de
Fe, or diocesan tribunals for the punishment of heresy
—the last remnant of the Inquisition.

German and Brussels Papers of the latest dates
have been received. Accounts from Scutari to the
15th ult. state that the insurrection against the PA..
CHA on the part of the Turkish inhabitants was in-
creasing in violence. The Christian inhabitants re-
solved to remain neutral, and the belligerents mutually
agreed to inflict no injury upon them.
A Dutch Journal publishes a long letter detailing
the particulars of the late riot at Amsterdam. The
facts are not of sufficient importance to be made the
subject of inquiry in the columns of a foreign print.
The following notice appears in the Brussels
Papers
The quotation of the Public Funds for the operations at
the evening meetings of Lloyd's, being almost always incor-
rect, the Broker informs the public, that they shall not take
any part in future in drawing up the statement of them."

SECOND EDITION.

SUN OFFICE, Five o'clock.

THE PARLIAMENT.

(THIS IiTENING.)

HOUSE OF LORDS.

The House of Lords merely sat to receive the reports
upon two Bills from the House of Commons, and after the
presentation of a few petitions of no public interest, adjourned.

HOUSE OF COMMONS.

The SPEAKER entered the House shortly before Four o'clock,
at which hour there being only thirty-eight Members present,
the Howe adjourned till to-morrow.

'HE FUNDS.-CLOSING PRICES.

BRITISH FUNDS.
Rank Sine& 2154 India Stock
3 per Cent Red. 9034 Ditto 80nd5........... ....... .... 8 pin
3 per Cent Cons 904 South Sea Stock ..... ...........
'l& per Con.
N per Celt Red 9BN Ditto New Annuities —
New 31 per Cent 9B Ex. Bills, 10104,„

4 per ewt, Assented
Dissented — Ditto SINK 2B pin.
Long Annuities to expire Rank Stock for Opg.
Jrl4 !Sri) 16% India Stock for Act.
Dct 18.1 ll-17 Consols for Act.
Jan. 188) —
kOREIGN kUNDS.

Austrian, 5 per cent Portuguese Bonds, 5 per cent.
Belgian, , per cent 99g . Ditto, New Ditto 9l
Brkzilian Bonds
Buenos fr-rPs. 6 per cent — ltuss,an Benda, 5 per cent. ....10914
Chaim], 6 per cent.........
Columbia% 6 per cent.......... 3N Spanish, 5 per cent...—.
Ditto, 1821 3'7% Ditto, 1834 46
Danish ~.
Greek Bonds, 1825.5 per cent. I Exchange
Mexican 5 per cent., 1825.... 1 French, 3 per cent. —t. —c.
Ditto, 1825, 6 percent. 37 I Dutch, 2j per cent 55
Peruvian, ii per cent
P