The Sun.
London, England, 1866-10-10 00:00:00

BEAUFORT STAKES.

The BEAUFORT STAKES of 150 sous each, h ft, for three-
year-olds; colts, Bst 10lb, fillies, Bst 61b; untrieds
al-
lowed 31b, if both 51b ; R.M. ; 5 subs.
Stoic (31b), Potomac (31b), Lady Violet (51b), Esca (31b),
Valeria (51b).

Esca
BEDFORD STAKES.

The BEDFORD STAKES of 50 sovs each, h ft, for two-year-
olds ; colts, Bst 101 b ; fillies, Bst 71b ; winners of a sweep-
stakes amounting to 500 sovs, with ten subs or upwards,
71b, all other winners of sweepstakes or plates, 31bextra ;
weights accumulative up to 101 b ; Bretby Stakes Course ;
13 subs.
Ines t 1
Moleskin

TURF AGENCY OFFICE,
100, JERMYN-STREET, Sr. JAMES'S, LONDON.

MR. SYDNEY SMITH (Member of Tatter-
sail's) begs ,to inform the racing public ho will
execute COMMISSIONS (by letter only) on all the prin-
cipal races throughout the year. For further particulars
and prices see advertisement in The Sportsman newspaper
every TUESDAY, THURSDAY, and SATURDAY
Price Current published DAILY, and forwarded on receipt
of stamped directed envelope.
Post-office Orders to be made payable at the Piccadilly
or St. James's street offices, and cheques to be crossed the
London and Westminster Bank." •

LAW INTELLIGENCE.—This Day.

SHERIFFS' COURT.
(Before Mr. Commissioner Kerr.)
SHERIFF OFFICERS' FEES.--FULLPOTT V. SCHULTZ.

This was an action brought by a sheriffs' officer to re-
cover his fees for possession and the costs of an inter-
pleader application. _ _

Mr. Webster, who appeared for the plaintiff, said that
plaintiff levied, by direction of defendant, upon the goods
of a person named Stocker, remaining in possession for ten
days, but in the meantime a third person claimed the
goods. Au interpleader summons was subsequently heard
by Lord Chief Baron Kelly and dismissed.
Defendant contended that, as nothing had been realised
under the levy, and as the interpleader summons had been
dismissed, neither fees nor costs could be recovered.
Mr. Webster urged that the costs had been incurred
through the express orders of defendant, and therefore he
must pay.

His Honour decided that the plaintiff, having done all
he was engaged to do, was entitled to the fees and costs.
Verdict for the plaintiff. ,

WORKMEN'S BEER SCORES.—SkDLER V. DAY.
This was an action to recover for refreshments supplied
to the defendant.

His Honour—What were the refreshments?
Plaintiff—Bread, cheese, and beer.
Mrs. Day, a very intelligent and respectable looking
woman, said that she appeared on behalf of her husband,
who had been served with beer when he was drunk. He
did not recollect having some of the beer. She had warned
the plaintiff time after time not to treat her husband, bid
he persisted in giving credit, and the result was that she
suffered for it.
His Honour—Of course, the wives suffer.
Mrs. Day—My husband has lost his work through
public-houses and facilities afforded to him by the plaintiff.
I have seen the plaintiff servo him with beer after he was
tipsy, and after I had expressely asked him not to do Po.
His Honour---I shall send the case before the magistrates
month,
at Clerkenwell, and theytwlll know what to dpc•eornmli
day.
Mrs. Day—l wish you would.
when
nirss
junnosavayoo
work,
tshhaaent ishas
an
sgy
ibonueeerenrh,
usubtdaonef
can
nw?
earno seven
per
w e
monthsek
the debt at ss. tlinroiusguhopnuobulireLhlloous:u.st
pay