The Sun.
London, England, 1859-02-22 00:00:00

3, GREAT MARLBOROUGH-STREET, W.

DR. M. R. CULVERWELL and SON, Mem-
ber of the Royal College of Surgeons, Licentiate of
Midwifery, and Apothecaries' Hall, London.
Dr. C. was originally apprenticed to his brother, and assisted
him until his death in 1852, when he was appointed (through
his brother's will) by the present executors, SOLE SUCCES-
SOR TO THE PRACTICE, which he carried on in Argyll-
place five years, and has now removed to 3, Great Marl-
borough-street, W., London. ,
Vide WILL, Somerset House.
Just published, price is. ; by post, 13 stamps, 18 sealed,
No. 1.
HEALTH, HAPPINESS, and LONGEVITY ;
on Debility, Nervousness, Dyspepsia, and Indigestion, with
Dietaries for both Sexes, and Analyses of all Food.
No. 2.
LOVE AND MARRIAGE :

their Obligations, Happiness, and Disappointments • Love
and other Matches. Removal of Sterility, and Healthy Off-
spring secured.
No. 3.
CASE BOOK :

.00 Cases of Spermatorriccea, Causes, Symptoms, and Treat-
ment, Cauterisation, and Galvanism.

On March lit, 1839, will be Published, with Plates,
No. 4,
An entire new and oricinal Work, entitled
OURSELVES.
Synopsis : The Physiology and Anatomy of our generation
—The Origin of Disease in both Sexes ; their Symptoms,
Treatment, and Cure. Also, an Exposition of, and Remedy
for, all Urinary derangements and Marital disqualifications,
To be had of Mann, Cornhill ; and the Author.
Consultations daily, 11 till 5 ; Evening, 7 till 9. Sundays till
To the Working Classes only,
Morning and Evening, 0 till 10. Advice and Medicine,
Half-a-Guinea.

ON PHYSICAL DISQUALIFICATIONS, GENERATIVE
INCAPACITY, AND IMPEDIMENTS TO MARRIAGE.
New and improved Edition, enlarged to 196 pages, illustrated
by 100 Anatomical Coloured Engravings on Steel, just pub-
lished, price, free by post, is.
THE SILENT FRIEND : A Medical Work
on the physical exhaustion and decay of the frame, from
the effects of solitary indulgence, infection, and the injurious
consequences from the use of Mercury : with observations on
the obligations of marriage, and directions for obviating cer-
tain disqualifications. By B. and L. PERRY and Co., Sur-
geons. Consultations as usual (see page 197). Sold by J. Allen,
trSeeatn,gLeor'ndiZ Oxford-
street ; and Gordon, 146,
20, Warwick-lane, Paternoster-row
The CORDIAL BALM of SI RIACUM i s employed In both
sexes to renovate the impaired powers of life. Its action is
purely balsamic: its power in reinvigorating the frame in all
cases of nervous and sexual debility, obstinate gleets, impo-
tency, barrenness, anddebilities arising from venereal excesses,
has been demonstrated by its unvarying sums in thousands of
cases. Price lls. per bottle, or four quantities in one for 335.,
which saves lie.
The CONCENTRATED DETERSIVE ESSENCE, an
anti-syphilitic remedy, for purifying the system, and is recom-
mended- for any of the varied forms of secondary symptoms,
such as eruptions on the skin, blotches on the I ead and face, en -
largements of the throat, tonsils, and uvula; threatened
destruction of the nose, palate, &c. Its action is purely deter-
sive, and its beneficial influence on the system is undeniable.
Price 11s. and 3.35. per bottle, also a saving of lls.
PERRY'S PURIFYING SPECIFIC PILLS constitute an
effectual remedy in either sex torah cases of gonorrhoea, gleet,
stricture, and diseases of the urinary organs. Price 2s. 9d.,
4s. 6d., and 11s. per box.
Sold by Daniel Church, 78, Gracechurch-street, City ; Bart-
ley-Hooper, 43, King William-street (four doors from L ondon-
bridge) ; G. F. Watts, 17, Strand; W. Sutton and Co., 10, Bow-
churchyard ; W. Edwards, 67, St. Paul's-churchyard ; J.
Sanger. 150, Oxford' Street ; Hannay and Dietrichsen, 63,
Oxford-street ; Butler and Harding, 4, Cheapside • Prout and
Harsant, 229 Strand, and all medical vendors IhrOughout
the United lilagdomj

" The NEW AMERICAN DISCOVERY' demonstrates
the absurdity of the English mode of treating such com-
plaints, will prove a blessing to the afflicted, who may safely
and easily regain pristine health by adopting the means pre-
sented."—Evening Sun.
For Qualification, vide " Diplomas," and the " London
Medical Directory."

LAW INTELLIGENCE.—Feb. 21.

COURT OF PROBATE AND DIVORCE.

Before the Judge-Ordinary and Common Juries.)

DOYLEY V. DOYLEY AND BALDIE.

Dr. Swabey and Mr. R. M. Kerr conducted the
petitioner's case.
This was a petition presented by Thomas Doyley
praying for a dissolution of his marriage with
Louisa Doyley on the ground of her adultery with
Wm. Dacre Baldie. The respondents pleaded a
denial of the adultery, but did not appear to sup-
port their plea. It appeared that the parties were
married at the church of St. Giles's-in-the-Fields,
in May, 1852, when the petitioner was 31 and the
respondent was 30 years of age. They resided at
various places until 1857, and one child was born
during their cohabitation. In June, 1857, they
took lodgings in Milton-street, Dorset-square, and
in the following September Mrs. Doyley left her
husband and has not since returned. Her departure
was proved by Charlotte Roberts, the landlady of
the house, who stated, in answer to the learned
hedge, that the cause of her leaving was that some
igh words passed between her and her husband in
consequence of her having stayed out one night
without his knowledge. It was proved that in
March, 1658, Mrs. Doyley was living in lodgings
at Deal with the co-respondent, and that they
passed as man and wife. A brother of Mrs. Doyley
named Edwin Robards was with them.

The jury found that the adultery had been
proved.
His Lordship observed that it was rather a
strange case as it now stood, and when the matter
came before the full Court it would be expedient to
have the petitioner in attendance, and also the
brother of the respondent.

KRETZSCHMAR V. KRETZSCHMAR AND RINECKER.

The petitioner, Louis Waldemar Kretzschmar,
prayed for a dissolution of marriage on the ground
of his wife's adultery. The respondent pleaded a
denial of the adultery, connivance, and condonation,
and also alleged that the petitioner had treated her
with cruelty. The co-respondent, Cajetan Rinecker,
pleaded the same pleas as the respondent with regard
to the charge of adultery, and further alleged that
the petitioner, by his conduct and declarations, had
led him to believe that the repondent was not his
lawful wife, and that the petitioner had been guilty
of adultery.
Mr. Sergeant Pigott and Dr. Spinks were coun-
sel for the petitioner; Mr. J. Simon and Mr. L.
Temple for the respondent ; and Dr. Swabey and
Dr. Tristram for the co-respondent.
The petitioner is a German, and carries on busi•
ness in Duke street, Bloomsbury, as a working
jeweller. In 1851 he married a Miss Elizabeth
Sharp, the respondent, with whom he lived first at
Howell-street, near the Goswell-road, and after-
wards at Duke-street. The respondent's sister
Susan always lived with them, and at times another
sister, Eliza, was also staying in the house. They
had one child, who was born in 1855. They were
in the habit of receiving lodgers, and in 1855 the
co-respondent, who is a watchmaker, with whom the
petitioner had been acquainted in Germany, took
up his residence with them. In the summer of 1856
the -family removed to Hampstead, Rinecker going
with them, and after staying there for about six
weeks went to Duke-Street in August. Mr. Kretz-
schmar afterwards went to Germany, and was
absent about three weeks. Shortly before Christmas,
1857, an expression dropped by one of Mrs.
Kretzschmar's sisters raised a suspicion in his mind
that his wife had formed an improper intimacy
with Rinecker. She solemnly denied that there
was any ground for the imputation, and he was
satisfied. A night or two before Christmas the
family were drinking gin and water together, when
Mrs. Kretzschmar drank out of Rinecker's glass.
Mr. Kretzschmar was angry, and, a quarrel took
place when they went up to bed, the result of which
was that Mrs. Kretzschmar went down and asked
for admission to the room occupied by Rinecker
and another lodger named Lutiger. Mrs.
Kretzschmar left the house the same night, and
Rinecker went on the following morning In a
day or two Mrs. Kretzschmar when back to her
husband and remained until the 4th of January,
1857. On that day, during the absence of her
husband, she again left home with her
aunt, Mrs. Pulman. She was persuaded to re-
turn at the end of January, and Mr. Kretzschmar
engaged a housekeeper, Miss Parry. Some corre-
spondence passed between the parties, and on the
30th of April she once more returned. She did
not, however, remain longer than the 11th of May,
when she finally left. In 1858 Mr. Kretzschmar
discovered that she and the co-respondent were
living together in lodgings at Woodstock-street,
Bond-street, as man and wife.
The principal witness for the petitioner was
Susan Sharp, the respondent's sister, who now
manages the petitioner's house, and is employed by
him in polishing jewellery. She stated that al-
though the petitioner was a passionate man, he was
a kind husband, and never used foul language to or
struck her sister. She admitted, however, that
when she had been present at quarrels between her
sister and the petitioner she had had her face
slapped by the petitioner with such violence that
blood flowed from her nose and mouth, and that he
had broken a ruler by striking it on a table. She
else; admitted that since her sister had left the
house she had complained of being beaten by him.
His conduct was described by this witness as very
kind and conciliatory to his wife, especially during
the intervals between her departures from home.
Her evidence was corroborated in this respect by
Misst was
Parry.lnot denied on the part of the respondents
that adultery
oeddis en that t
itthice hadh him
mbn
petitioner's eeto the relief
conductcommitted,b
hehu
at it
dwa
been
s n-
prayed.
suchcoln
support of this case the other sister, Eliza Sharp,
was called, and. stated that the petitioner was m
the habit of using filthy and abusive language to
his wife on little or no provocation, and frequently
struck her, sometimes with his hands and some-
' times with a book, or anything that was near him.
She also stated that Susan, as well as his wife, was
ill-treated and beaten by him. Her evidence was
corroborated by a beryant and some other wit.

John Lee, 30, was indicted for a robbery from the
person. The prosecutor was a seaman, formerly
belonging to the Monarch, 84, and the prisoner
robbed him of a watch which he had purchased
with part of the wages he received when he was
paid off. The prisoner was found guilty, and a
former conviction for robbery from the person and
a sentence of seven years' transportation were
proved against him. He had had a ticket of leave,
which was revoked on his being taken for a felony,
committed soon after he obtained it, and he had
served out the whole of the term. He had been
known to the police for. 15 years, and had been
repeatedly convicted.
The Assistant-Judge said, this was a case where
the power of sending the prisoner abroad ought to
be exercised, and with that view the Court would
sentence him to be kept in penal servitude for
fourteen years.
Henry Trainer, 36, ironfounder, was convicted of
unlawfully assaulting and beating John Connell, a
police constable, in the execution of his duty.
The Assistant-Judge said, it was much to be re-
gretted that a hard-working, industrious man, as
the prisoner evidently was, should get under the
influence of drink, and then commit an outrage
upon a
.policeman without the least provocation,
who was simply doing his duty in preserving order
in the street. The police must be protectedin the
performance of their duty to the public, as well as
punished when they did wrong, and this case must
follow the ordinary rule. The sentence upon the
prisoner was therefore nine months' hard labour.
Michael Green, 18, was convicted of feloniously
breaking and entering the dwelling-house of Wm.
Henry, and stealing a mustard pot and other ar-
ticles, his property.
A number of previous convictions were proved
against him, and
The Court sentenced him to three years' penal
servitude.

Charles Hitch, 18, pleaded guilty of having
stolen a quantity of books and Parliamentary re-
ports, value £2O, the property of Robert Stanhope

He was sentenced to be kept to hard labour for
fifteen calendar months.

Robert Collier, 26, was indicted for stealing a
dead pig from one of Pickford's Tans, on its way
from Camden-town to Newgate-market.

The prisoner was met by a policeman, 115 E, in
New Oxford-street, carrying the pig, and in reply
to the question where he got it from, ho said he had"
found it near Meux's Brewery, and was going to
take it to Bow-street; but the policeman remarked
that going westward towards Regent's-circus was
a roundabout way to Bow-street ; whereupon the
prisoner threw the pig down, damning it, and said
" He wouldn't carry it any further, for it was like
the policeman's impudence to interfere with him."
The prisoner in his defence called one Alonzo
Smith, a scavenger, with whom he lodged in Peter-
street, Westminster, and he deposed that the pri-
soner and himself were taking a stroll in the early
morning, after a " spree " over-night, to shake off
the effects of their potations, and that after they
had patronised several coffee-stalls they got to New
Oxford-street, where they found the pig lying in
the middle of the road. He then
.parted company
with the prisoner, but he could give no reason for
abandoning his friend immediately after so unex-
pected a prize had fallen in their way.
The jury found the prisoner Guilty, and he was
sentenced to six months' hard labour.
Mr. Orridge prosecuted for Messrs. Pickford.