The Sun.
London, England, 1832-06-11 00:00:00

A NEWSPAPER FOR SALE.

T1-1E TITLE, PRESS, and TYPES of a
NEWSPAPER, some time established in one of the
most populous counties in England, and the only Paper
published its that County. To a person who can command
but a small capital, this offers one of the most advantageous
opportunities.

Apply by letter (post-paid) to B. C., at Mr. Barker's
Country Newspaper and General Advertising Office, 33,
Fleet-street.

PURSUANT to an Order of the HIGH
COURT OF CHANCERY, made in a cause
" GIBSON v. BOTT," any person or persons claiming
to be the child or children of Jenny Davies, formerly of
Astey's-row, Lower-street, Islington, afterwards of
Birnsbury-place, Islington, in the county of Mid-
dlesex, and late of Worthing, in the county of Sussex,
widow, (who died on the 4th day of September, 1820),
or of Letitia Gibson, formerly of Garston Down and late
of Croydon, in the county of Surrey, widow, (who died
on tho 20th day of May, 1831), or the personal represen-
tative or representatives of such of them as are since dead,
are, on or before the 25th day of June, 1832, by their
solicitors, to come in and prove their kindred before
GEORGE BOONE ROUPELL, Esq., one of the Mas-
ters of the said Court, at his Chambers in Southampton-
buildings, Chancery-lane, London, or, in default thereof,
they will be peremptorily excluded the benefit of the said
Decree.

CARPETS.--CARTER and CO.,
2, Cheapaide, near St. Paul's.
120 Pieces BRUSSELS CARPETING, of first-rate
quality, price 3a. 1041. per yard. Many of the Patterns
are perfectly novel and elegant.—Also,
7,000 yard-wide KIDDERMINSTER and VENE-
TIAN CARPETING, excellent quality for bed-rooms,
Ste., at 2s. 4d. and 2s. 6d. per yard.
5,000 ditto, superior quality, at 2s. 10d. and 3a. per
yard.

_
4,000 wide STAIR CARPETING, at is. 4d. and
2s. 2d. per yard.
500 HEARTH-RUGS, with Flooreloths, Druggets,
and other articles connected with the trade, equally cheap.
N.B. In addition to the above, the Stock comprises the
largest assortment of the most elegant Drawing Room Pat-
terns in the Trade.

Patterns forwarded in Town or Country.
MINERAL SUCCEDANEUM FOR FILLING DE-
CAYED TEETH, without Heat or Pressure, and IN-
CORRODIBLE ARTIFICIAL TEETH, without
Wires or other Ligatures.
MONSIEUR MALLAN and SONS, Sur-
geon-Dentists, No. 32, GREAT RUSSELL-
STREET, BLOOMSBURY, and 9, HALF-MOON-
STREET, PICCADILLY, grateful for the high and
extensive patronage which has so eminently distinguished
their professional exertions since their al rival in the British
Metropolis, respectfully announce to their Friends and the
Public in general, that they still continue to restore DE-
CAYED TEETH, with their celebrated MINERAL
SUCCEDANEUM, so universally recommended by the
Faculty of London and Paris. The operation of Filling
Teeth is pea formed in a few seconds, without the slightest
Pain, heat, or pressure. They also FASTEN LOOSE
TEETH, in a manner singularly efficacious, and SUPPLY
WHOLE or PARTIAL SETS of TEETH formed of the
above INCORRODIBLE MINERAL, or of Natural Sub-
stances, without WIRE or other LlGATURES—guaran-
teed to answer every purpose for Articulating and Masti-
eating.—Charges as in Paris.
The Faculty are respectfully invited to witness the suc-
cessful result of the Mineral Succedaneum.

, N.B. One of the above firm may he consulted Mon-
"Pi and Thursdays, at King-street, Great Yarmouth,
and the intermediate days, at the Hay-market, Norwich,
until the 30th of June.

ESTATE.
SUSSEX, ON THE
THE BORDERS OF HAMPSHIRE.
Upwards of One Thousand Eight Hundred Acres, and
the Manor of Wenham, Fishery, &c.
TO BE SOED BY AUCTION,
By Mr. REID,
Son-in-law and Successor to the late Mr. JOHN ROBINS,
(Of Warwick House, Regent•street,)
At Garraway's Coffee-house, 'Change-alley, Cornhill, on
Thump/kr, the sth July, 1832, at Tw' elve in 'One
Lot, by direction of Trustees, and subject to' the ap-
proval of the Lord High Chancellor,
AVALUABLE, DESIRABLE, and very
COMPACT FREEHOLD ESTATE, situate in
the Parish of Rogate, County of Sussex, between the
capital Market Towns of Petersfield and Midhurst, and
skirted by the high road to Portsmouth, about six miles
from Liphook ; comprising
BOGATE LODGE,
A comfortable, eleant, and pleasant residence, beautifully
situate, commanding pleasing and interesting views, com-
bining every comfort and convenience for a gentleman's
family and establishment, now in the occupation of John
Gage, Esq. with excellent attached and detached offices,
pleasure grounds, productive gardens, part walled, melon
ground, orchard, &c. ; stables, coach-houses, farm-yard,
buildings, &c.
THE MANOR OF WENHAM,
Extending over Three Thousand Acres of Land, forming
one of the best sporting districts in the county of Sussex,
abounding with Game, including the
RARITY OF BLACK GAME.

The Fishery, of nearly Two Miles in Extent, in the
River Rotber, abounding with Trout and other Fish.
The Lands are divided into elligible Farms, with farm-
houses, yards, barns, and all requisite agricultural build-
ings, containing about
ONE THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED ACRES
Of excellent meadow, marsh, arable, wood-land, and plan-
tation, in the occupation of Mr. Thomas Hall, C. Ball, W.
Ayling, and other respectable tenant.
The Woods and Plantations in hand ; sundry Cottages,
Gardens, &c.

BORDEN WOOD AND COMMON,
Cinin
ONE HUNDREDonta g about
AND THIRTEEN ACRES
Of
ry
On
i Plantation, in a tine thiing state. Cottage and Gar-
den hand. Also a Portion of the
RECTORIAL TITHES of the Parish of ROG ATE.
The Rental and Estimated value nearly
ONE THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED POUNDS.
Affording a most desirable Property for Residence and
investment. Distant front the Metropolis about fifty miles,
four from Peterstield, and eight from Midhurst, in a fine
sporting part of the County, and nearly in a Ring Fence.
The Residence to he
.viewed, by permission of the
Tenant, with Tickets only ; the Faruts on application to
the respective Tenants.
FParticulars may be had of Mr. Guldring, near the
Lt4te lying Bull, on the Portsmouth Road, who will show the
at the Red Lion and Dolphin, Petetfield ; Foun-
tain, Portsmouth ; Anchor, Liphook ; King's Arms,
Guildford and Godahning ; Swan, Petworth ; Angel,
Midhurst; Mr. Weller, and the Dolphin, Chichester; Li-
braries, Brighton; Mr. Adam's, Hillhampton, near
Worcester; of Messrs. Broughton and White, solicitors,
Great Nlarlborough.stieet ; at Garraway's ; and of Mr.
Reid, No. 170, Regent-street, where a plan of the Estate
inisy he seen,

Mr. DopsoN stated that this was an applicatioi
on the part of his client, Mr. Storey, a respectabl,
attorney, residing at St. Alban's, praying a divorce,
on the ground of adultery committed by his wif,
with John Alexander Harper, his nephew. Th,
affidavit of Miss Mary Storey, a near relative of the
husband, stated, that on the night of the 21st May,
1831, she was awoke out of her sleep at the hous(-
of Mr. Harpur, of Hackney, where Mrs. Storey
was then on a visit, by a noise which she supposed
proceeded from persons trying to get into her bed-
room window ; the noise appeared like the sawing
of timber. She listened, and ascertained that the
noise proceeded from Mrs. Storey's room, which
was separated from her's by a slight partition. She
went to Mrs. Storey's room door, and distinctly
heard her in conversation with her nephew, John
Alexander Harpur. The conversation appeared to
be affectionate. She asked Mrs. Storey whether
she was ill, but without opening the door, and was
answered by her that she was not. She then, for
greater confirmation, went into Mr. Harpur's room
(opposite to Mrs. Storey's), and found he was ab-
sent. She then went to Mrs. Storey's door, which
she found locked ; but after a short time, and some
confused noise in the room, Mrs. Storey admitted
her; and, in answer to her inquiry for Mr. Har-
pur, she said she did not know where he was; that
if he was not in his bed, he was probably gone to
the water-closet. Witness said she was not satis-
fied that Mr. Harpur was not in the room ; and look-
ing under the bed, saw him lying at full length in his
shirt and night-cap. She understood that he usually
slept in satin drawers, but could not say whether he
had them on. On seeing him, she exclaimed, " Oh,
Mrs. Storey, I have heard much of you, but never
till now believed it !" and reproached her with
having committed adultery with her husband's ne-
phew, and left the room with feelings of indigna-
tion. Mrs. Storey followed her to her room, and
requested her to return with her to her's ; she did
so, and there Mrs. Storey attempted to explain Mr.
Harpur's being in her room, saying he came in to
light his candle. Miss Storey asked why she con.
cealed him under the bed ? She admitted that it
was an awkward situation; but said she was ashamed
to have him seen in her room at so late an hour, and
was so confused, that she allowed him to get under
the bed. Witness consented to keep the matter secret,
from feelings of respect for Mrs. Storey's children
and her husband ; but requested Mrs. Storey to
leave the house the next day. To this Mrs. Storey
objected, saying it would be sure to lead to an ex-
posure ; and witness consented to her staying some
time longer. Witness was convinced that an adul-
terous intercourse had taken place between Mrs.
Storey and Mr. Harpur at the time ; and she ac-
cused Mrs. Storey, who was advanced in life, and
the mother of six or seven children, as being more
to blame than Mr. Harpur, who was a youth of 20,
arid Mrs. Storey admitted that it was more her
fault than his. The witness stated that Mr. Storey
was in the habit of treating his wife with indifference.
Mr. Anthony Browne, half-brother to Mr. Storey,
some days after the commission of the unlawful act
at Hackney, having been informed of it by Miss
Storey, followed Mrs Storey to Brighton, where, in
the presence of her mother, Mrs. Bridon, he intro-
duced the subject. Mrs. Storey said, " I know
what you mean—you allude to Alexander Harpur."
Her mother said, in a tone of surprise, " What's
that ?" Mrs. Storey replied, " Oh, nothing
mother, Alexander Harpur came into my room
while I was in bed. I asked him how he dared to
do it ? and he said, don't be alarmed, I frequently
go into my aunt Mary's room while she is in bed.'
So he seated himself in the arm-chair, and began
giving me an account of the Epsom races, and the
heavy losses he suffered there, which plunged him into
difficulties that embarrassed and agitated him very
much ; on which I gave him advice, and remon-
strated with him on his conduct." To this he (Mr.
Browne) replied, " not caught in the arm-chair,
Mrs. Storey, but under your bed." She admitted
that it was so; but did not admit any criminal
intercourse.

Dr. ADAMS, for Mrs. Storey, contended that the
charge was the effect of a conspiracy on the part of
her husband against his client. It was clearly
proved by Mrs. Driver, who visited them, that he
treated her with the greatest indifference; and Mrs.
W. Harpur, Mrs. Storey's greatest enemy, admitted
that he treated her harshly. Was it to be sup-
posed that a lady 44 years of age, and the mother
of seven children, would be guilty of a criminal in-
tercourse with a youth of 19, and he her own nephew?
The Court, he was sure, would not pronounce a
separation on the single evidence of Miss Mary
Storey, who, after she said she was convinced of
the criminal intercourse, kissed Mrs. Storey on
leaving her bedroora-Zand kissed her again the next
morning at the breakfast table. It was, besides, in
evidence that this youth was in the habit of going
into all the ladies' bed-rooms; that he I,vent one
night into that of Mrs. William Bell, who turned
him out in a rage; and that he rolled Mrs. 'William
Harpur on the carpet at the Jerusalem Coffee-house.
Doctor LUSIIINGTON took a review of all the
facts in the case, acquitted Mr. Storey of all blame,
and pronounced the sentence of divorce prayed for.
The case excited great interest, and lasted till six
o'clock.

BANKRUPTCY COURT, JUNE 9.

EX-PARTE MORLEY, IN RE GOVETT AND LEIGH.

Mr. Twtss stated yesterday that this was a peti-
tion by Mr. Morley, a separate creditor of Mr.
Leigh's, praying that proof of the debt of Mr.
Sherlock, claiming also to be a separate creditor,
might be expunged. The debt proved by Mr.
Sherlock was for 7001. 18s. upon bills of exchange.
Mr. Leigh had already been before the Court as in
partnership with Mr. Govett, and as having been
often a bankrupt. He was a bankrupt in 1803, and
again in 1811. Under his second commission he
did not pay 15s. in the pound. After this he pur-
chased, in 1814 and 1815, goods from Sherlock,
merchant of Dublin, to the amount of 4641. After
this, a third commission of bankrupt was issued
against Leigh in 1815. As the law stood at that
time, a third commission was deemed valid, even
against a person who had not paid 15s. in the pound
under the second commission. Such being the state
of the law, it became the duty of Mr. Sherlock to
prove, if he meant to prove at all, under the third
commission. He did not, however, do so, arid
Mr. Leigh obtained his certificate. In 1819, Mr.
Leigh being, as he stated, upon business in Ireland
Sherlock threatened that he would take immediate
proceedings against him for his old debt, sin-
less he gave him some security for it. Mr.
Liegh being informed, that, according to the law
of Ireland, his certificate would not protect him,
and it being essential to the business upon which
he went that he should remain at liberty, gave bills
to Sherlock to the amount of 638/. 12s. for princi-
pal and interest of his old debt. He (Mr. Twiss)
contended ►hat Mr. Sherlock had no right to arrest
Mr. Leigh, after having neglected to take the reme-
dy he was entitled to under the commission. But
in 1820 there was another commission issued againt
Leigh, so that supposing the bills obtained by Sher-
lock were worth anything, now was the time for
him to prove them. He did not, however, do that
which he might have done, but lodged a detainer
against Mr. Leigh whilst lie was in the Fleet.
Leigh remained in prison from a period subsequent
to the issuing of the fourth commission it► 1820

The COURT said the case was quite clear. The
bills given in 1819 took the debt out of the Statute
of Limitations, and in 1823 that statute had not run.
Mr. Sherlock was not affected by the commissions
of 1803 and 1811, for this debt did not arise till
1814 and 1815. It was true he did not prove un-
der the commission of 1815; but he was not obliged
to do so, if he chose to preserve his remedy at law.
Then with respect to the manner in which the bills
were obtained from the bankrupt, if duresse had been
made out, no doubt the case would would have stood
upon a very different footing. All that Mr. Sher-
lock threatened was to take proceedings, and he had
every right to do so. It might be a hardship upon
the creditors under the present commission, that the
goods with which they had trusted the bankrupt
should go to form a fund out of which old creditors
like Mr. Sherlock might be satisfied, but it was no
greater hardship than if Mr. Sherlock had taken the
bankrupt's goods in execution, as he had a right to
do within a week of the creditors under this com-
mission having trusted them with him.

POLICE INTELLIGENCE.

B OW-STREET.

Colin Ross, Esq., a gentleman known on the turf,
applied for a warrant against Captain G. Rose, of
the 17th Lancers. The applicant alleged that he
was on the Epsom Race Course on Thursday, and
words occurred between him and the Captain in
consequence of some previous transaction. Appli-
cant, deeming himself insulted, asked the Captain
for his card, which was refused. He followed him
about for some time, observing, " If you are a gen-
man, why refuse to give me your card?" and, as he
still refused to give his name or address, he said,
" Then, Sir, you are an ungentlemanly fellow." The
Captain, on this, struck him several times on the head
and face with a loaded whip. [The applicant exhi-
bited a black eye, several cuts on the head, and a
wound over the left temple.]
Mr. MINSIIULL granted the warrant, and it was
placed in the hands of Taunton.
Saturday night a young man of dark complexion,
who gave his name John Lamb Rudd, was brought
to this office by Stevens, the officer, charged, under
extremely singular citcumstances, with having robbed
his father of bank notes and otherproperty, amount-
ing to about 2601. It will be recollected, that at
the inquest on Mr. Paas, at Leicester, it was stated
that he had been seen on the road to Loughborough,
in company with a young man, and that they had
with them a small black trunk. Before the appre-
hension of Cook, the murderer, was known in Lon-
don, information was received, that young man, sup-
posed to be that miscreant, had arrived in London by
one of the Northern coaches, and had with him a
black box. Stevens was sent in pursuit, and succeeded
in discovering that a young man, of genteel appear-
ance, having with him a black trunk, and accompanied
by a fashionably attired cyprian, had made an excur-
sion to Richmond. The officer did not succeed in se-
curing him, and he returned to town. When it was
ascertained that Cook had been apprehended, it oc-
curred that the young man, of whom the officer had
been in search, was the same who was seen with
Cook, as described ; and under the impression that
he might be an accessary after the fact, and was still
in possession of a part of the money taken from
Mr. Paas, Stevens continued his pursuit. After
great exertion, he traced him on Saturday after-
noon to a tavern at Woolwich, dining with a dash-
ing female. Stevens called him aside, and told
him he was a Bow-street officer, and that he must
consider himself a prisoner. He made no resist-
ance, and Stevens, upon searching him, found a
50/. bank note, a 20/. bank post bill, sixty sove-
reigns, a silver watch, and a great quantity of
wearing apparel, silk handkerchiefs and other arti-
cles, chiefly new. Stevens also found a Savings'
Bank book, in the name of " Henry Rudd, Pres-
cott-street, Liverpool," from which it appeared that
1001. had beers drawn from that Bank within the
last few days. He also found a black box. He
asked the prisoner if he had any remark to make ?
And he said, " I should not have done it if my fa-
ther had found me in clothes and money sufficient."
Stevens, who was at once convinced that the pri-
soner had nothing to do with the horrible crime of
a participation in which he was at first suspected,
said, " that was no reason why you should rob your
father." To which he replied, "It may be very
true, but I did it, and I must take the consequences."
He was then brought to London, and admitted, by
the way, that during• the few (lays he had been in
town, he had spent a considerable sum.
Mr. CHOPPING, the solicitor, attended, and said it
was quite clear the prisoner could not have been the
supposed companion of Cook after the murder, but
the circums.ances were still very singular.
The prisoner, when asked if he had anything to
say, admitted that his father was Mr. Henry Rudd,
of No. 3, Prescott-street, Liverpool, Excise Offiaer;
but declined saying anything more at present. The
new apparel he had purchased himself.
Mr. MiNsitum, after some remarks upon the
very singular manner in which the robbery was
detected, remanded the prisoner for a week.