The Sun.
London, England, 1835-05-26 00:00:00

}OREIG

Austrian, 5 per cent -
Belgian, 5 per cent lOl
Brazilian Bonds
Buenos Ayres, 6 per cent
Chilian, 6 per cent • 5l
Colombian, 6 per cent
Ditto, 1821 39
Danish 761
Greek Bonds, 1825,5 per cent —
Mexican, 5 per cent., 1825
1825, 6 per vent 391,4
Peruvian, 6 per cent

THE WIFE,' BY THE HON. MRS. NORTON,"
observes a contemporary, " is a lecture upon hearts ; she se-
lects an ordinary circle of society and lays bare its workings,
with all the delicate and minute analytic power which belongs
in such matters, especially to the woman of genius. The de-
licate, graceful and eloquent manner in which this is accom-
plished by her is perfectly prepossessing ; the novel reader
will use a still stronger expression. Such a book might have
been one of those upon which the spirit of Fox was fond of
reposing, when he forgot Vondon politics in his temporary
rustications."

The sailing of the Sultan's fleet from the Darda-
nelles for Tripoli, is confirmed. It left the Straits on the
28th, with a force calculated not to exceed 3,000 or 4,090 men.

~~

PARLIAMENTARY SUMMARY.

In the Loans last night, the Duke of RICHMOND made some
observations on the evidence of the Select Committee 011
Prison Discipline. Lord MELBOURNE I
had no hesitation n
pledging the Government to a Bill in accordance with tbo
resolutions of that Committee. The Earl of RODEN asked
whether the Despatch of the Lord Lieutenant, relative to
bos
Excellency's public entry into Dublin, would be laid before
the House. Lord MELBOURNE replied in the negative—tke
production of the Despatch would be injurious to the public
service. The Noble Earl repeated the exaggerated statement
he made on a former night. Lord LEITRIM said be
himself had formed a part of the procession, which was most
orderly. A conversation of considerable length on this sub-
ject took place, which terminated in a declaration by Lord
MELBOURNE, that he would not at present enter further into
the case, but that if a distinct motion were made for the pro'
duction of the Despatch, or for an Inquiry, he would the!!
state the grounds on which he resisted it. The Noble Lot
added, that the law relating to party processions should not be
violated with impunity.
In the COMMONS, two subjects chiefly occupied the House-•;
the Marquis of CHANDOS'S Motion on Agricultural DistrT,
ard the case of Mr. CHILDS of Bungay, to which, it roll
recollected, The Sun first called the attention of the coo?:
try. Sir WILLIAM FOLKES and Mr. HuNiE introduced ti°,
subject. A great number of petitions from various Placed
is Norfolk and Suffolk were presented on behalfq;
•
the perseutfed and uncompromising Mr. Camps.
HUME stated that Mr. CHILDS had proffered his propertio;
hut instead of seizing it, Mr. CHILDS had been dragged fr 4
his home, and consigned .to a distant dungeon. b,
KELLY attempted the defence of the Churchwardens! ° f
serving that Mr. CIIILDS had a right to st•ek the alteratlo°°,,
the law, but he had no right to rig
it. Dr. LusnisOi
declared that the proceed;ngs against Mr. CHILDS wc.re
and said, that " it was the duty of the Judge of the sec,
siastical Court to have read the Statute • and it ought to
known that that Judge had sent a man to' gaol because bel
ignorant of the Statute Law. Never since the passingf°,
the Act 53 George 111. had he known a single instance °to
case for Church-rates under 101. being brought before
Ecclesiastical Courts without previously going before the.
I°P
tires." Lord JOHN RUSSELL condemned the proceedingreei
As to the question of Church-rates, he thought it was
desirable that Church-rates should be abolished. He °Gs,
however, that nothing could be done this Session, as the ;00
vcrnment was desirous of receiving all possible informal
from the Church Commissioners. His Majesty's present:7l
lusters proposed to bring forward this Session the Mltil
reform ltriie
Corporations' Reform Bill in England and Wales, 01,
of the Irish Church, particularly with a view of wept
ing into effect the appropriation principle. The Goverato,4
would not pledge itself to more than the two measures the is
had just named. Sir R. PEEL said that the Government %lig,.
to be ready with many other measures which the Right D'
Oh'
Bart. enumerated. The CHANCELLOR of the ExCHEQVS¢ be
served that this new-born Bill zeal would deceive neither to
Dissenter, nor any one else. Mr. WILKS on the port °I or
Dissenters, was perfectly satisfied with the course con
ogee
plated by his Majesty's Ministers. If the two great meatitis.
were pressed forward this session, the minor ones mightesoo
factorily. stand over. Dr. BOWRING said the Dissenters °v
distinguish their friends, and would be prepared to wait: Tip
Marquis of CH 11
ANDOS brought forward his motion on .iol'
',41" .00
tural distress, with a view to the reduction of some PO the
of those burdens to which the land is subject, through ois
pressure of local and general taxation." The Noble "pd
proposed to take off the Tax on Windows in farm-houses,bf
the tax on spring-carts, and to reduce the County late•
removing the charge for building and repairing bridgeg•,.eet
thought that some relief might be afforded by Goverlt" it
purchasing the surplus corn now in the country, and la/.170-
11p. Many charges, such as prosecuting felons and Inel° The
ing prisoners in gaols, fell on the agricultural interest. to
Earl of DARLINGTON seconded the motion for an sdclre,s A
his Majesty. Lord JOHN RUSSELL moved an amendment' of
long debate followed, at the close of which, the niotio-50.
the Noble Marquis was rejected by a majority of 211 01

HOUSE OF LORDS.-(THIS DA:

The Earl of Shaftesbury, Lord Lyndhurst, Lord Br°u°gbaw'
and Lord Strafford, sat to-day to hear English appeals'
THE HON. ROBERT KING V. HAMLET. be&r°
The arguments in this appeal, which were partly
sometime since, were resumed to-day. The appellant ?sir,
son of Lord Viscount Lorton, and the respondent s,_„iog
Hamlet, the eminent jeweller. In 1828, the appellant 910
greatly embarrassed and in want of money, applied, re'
his solicitor, to the respondent for a loan of 8,000/ $;„`"0".
spondent refused to lend money, but exp 0
ressed his wiLlln'iloP•
to let the appellant have goods to the amount out of ' - efe
To this the appellant agreed, and articles to the amount wars
furnished by the respondent, and the necessary instrute ce,
were executed. The goods were sold by Mr. Robins, thrre,
lebrated auctioneer, and produced the sum only of 3,4821" t the
vious to this sale the appellant, who had been advised that the .
charges for the goods were unreasonable, filed a bill agaratell
respondent to set aside the transaction, which was ultir„, 00
dismissed for want of prosecution, the appellant bav',": tr
means of carrying it on. On his marriage in 1829 t""thei
pellant had a suitable provision made for him, and being:
be
in possession of the means of carrying on a suit in equitirel
filed another bill, praying that the respondent might be elm
to deliver up the deeds that had been executed on being pali
amount for which the. goods had been sold, together wi, pro-
terest, and that he might be restrained from taking of the
ceeding against the estate of the appellant in respect notion
sum of 8,0001. Upon the motion for the iRi„,.ll-: ante
coming on to be argued, the Vice- Chanceller„ Is,-tutbe
the, injunction upon the appellant's paying into Lour Js'
sum of 3,130/. The cause came on for hearing '"issed
nuary, 1834, before the Lord Chancellor, who ise)flicad.
the appellant's bill and ordered the injunction to be cl,ignirre•
From this decision the present appeal was brought.
app
ell.--
Horne and Mr. Parry were heard on behalf of the
a previous day, and this morning Mr. Knight, with who 'lie'
Mr. Stewart, addressed their Lordships on behalf of the t to
spondent. Among the goods furnished by the responder'
the appellant were a suite of pearls, 1,5031. 10s.; aAi
necklace, 1,155/. ; silver gilt breakfast set, 6191. /Os' ; $
silver candlesticks, 3931. 65.; diamond comb, 2411 igior
gold and diamond snuff box with enamelled portrait of
leon, 294/. ; a ruby and diamond suite, 2671. 15s.
•

CHANCERY COURT-(THIS D

The MASTER of the ROLLS, and Mr. Justice 13054rieursv4
sat in Lincoln's Inn Hall to-day as Lords Commissi°„;olo6
the Great Seal, and took motions, none of which P°
any point of public interest.