The Sun.
London, England, 1866-05-09 00:00:00

Won by a neck.
BADMINTON STAKES.

.........fix ran.................................. 3
WELTER STARES.

Ethelred
Lord Zetland
Love Letter

Three ran.

ARRIVALS AT YORK.

Redcap, Windham, Castanet, Wentworth, Wise-.
man, Terror, Vagrant, Qui Vive, Raglan, Lytham,
Cathedral, Gulnara, Duty Free, Miss Haworth,
El Cid, Avis, Lady Coverdale, Festival, Comus,
Armour, Lady Eston, Sundeelah, Count, Hanover,
Pedant, Dolan, Bob Chambers, Outcast, Thermo.
meter, Lady Sykes.

VICTORIA CLUB BETTING-THIS DAT.

GREAT NORTHERN HANDI&P.
sto 2 agst Regalia (taken and offered)
sto 1 agst Dolan (offered—take 6to 1)
6to 1 agst Cathedral (offered-7 to 1 taken)
10 to 1 agst Windham (taken)
12 to 1 agst Dalby (taken)
DERBY.
7 to 4 agst Lord Lyon (offered)
3to 1 agst Rustic (offered-7 to 2 taken)
11 to 1 agst Redan (offered)
12 to 1 agst Blue Riband (offered)
20 to 1 agst Vespasian (offered)
2000 to 30 agst Westwick (taken)
1000 to 10 agst Maori Chief (offered)
3 to 1 agst Knight of the Crescent, 1,2, 8 (taken

IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT,

HOUSE OF COMMONS—TiIIs DAY.
The SPEAKER took the chair at 12 o'clock.
CLERKS TO JUSTICES BILL.

Mr. COLVILLE moved the second reading of this bill,
the object of which was to prevent clerks to justices in
courts undertaking the prosecution in cases sent to quarter

sessions.
Mr. GOLDNEY moved as an amendment that the bill
be read a second time that day six months.
Mr. CAVE seconded the amendment.
Mr. EVANS said he regretted he could not support
the bill which had been introduced, although he had no
objection to clerks to justices being paid by salaries, but ha
thought the conduct of the prosecutions ought to be a part
of their duties.
Mr. LEEMAN said his experience led him to believe
that the bill, instead of being an improvement, would be
an obstacle to the administration of justice.
Mr. SCOURFIELD and Mr. G. DENMAN opposed the bill.
The bill was eventually negatived without a division,
every member who addressed the house having expressed
opinions against the measure.

VETERINARY SURGEONS' BILL.
Mr. HOLLAND moved the second reading of this bill,
which was to prevent unqualified persons practising the
profession of veterinary surgeon, or assuming the title
without first having the diploma issued by the Royal
Veterinary College. The bill inflicted certain penalties
on all persons who infringed its provisions.
Mr. NEWDEGATE thought the bill a most useful one,
and he hoped the house would assent to the proposal.
Mr. BRUCE said he did not intend to oppose the second
reading of the bill, but it must not be taken that he assented
to the bill as it stood. He should have to suggest some
very material alterations in committee.
The bill was then read a second tune.
The Burials in Burghs (Scotland) Bill was also read a
second time.
PUBLIC COMPANIES BILL.
This bill, which was brought in by Mr. D. OntrFrrit,
elicited some discussion the other evening, but the debate
was adjourned. The proposal of the bill was that proxies
might be taken after the poll had closed at meetings of
public companies.
The house divided, when there appeared—
For the amendment
Against it 46

Majority
COMMON LAW COURTS (IRELAND) BILL.
The second reading of this bill was called in due course,
but no person rising it was postponed until to-morrow.
COURT OF CHANCERY (IRELAND) BILL.
On the motion for resuming the adjourned debate on
this bill,
Mr. WHITESIDE said he had just entered the house
prepared to discuss the merits of the Common Law Courts
(Ireland) Bill. He found that it bad been postponed, and
he had not now the necessary documents with him to
enable him to speak on the Court of Chancery (Ireland)
bill. He hoped the Attorney-General for Ireland would
not press the proceeding with the measure.
The ATTORNEY-GENERAL said he had informed
his hon. and learned friend that the bill would be taken
that day, and he could not now think it was reasonable to
ask for further delay.
Mr. WHITESIDE thought it was anything but cour-
teous to press the motion forward under such circum-
stances. The Attorney-General for Ireland refused to
assent to further delay, and the hon. and learnede gentle-
man (Mr. Whiteside) having
few minutes
tem-
porary absence of the Speakermefonrts.
he
required, the
to possess himself of the
hon.documents
learned gentleman
debate was resumed.
The merits of the bill, which contained
availed himself of the
proceeded to discuss the .
the Irish Court of
ants propose in
ber of new apnointm
in Ireland asked for the bill, and
altogether unneces-
sary. .'do
person
nded it was
therefore he contended th Mast
eous in abolishing e ers
That it was erroneous
o Vice-Chancellors, with
193 clauses, and condemned, m thed first. instance, the num-
sary. Tha
in Chancery,
staffs almost identical
He contended that the act was one
which led to opinions very nil_
1 with those which at present existed
those who originated such bills. He moved
favourable to
rcad a second time that day six rueeths.
that the bill be
n MILLER seconded the amendment. He said
Mr. 8• B. him that the Government intended to take
and. creating tw .
second reading without givin
g any ex-
the vofitennol;urther than the very meagre stateme t ha
objectionable, and raensdtherefore he trusted- then
Pla"- the introduction of the bill.
ioitnf a thosetheaM ekadsi nttetodrhs'
the
Master's-office.
mostoitiaass„nrsladoef t°ll Crown' would afford the ho6uusechsoamec C'adutlarsedvrit-
tioual explanation relative to the motives that induced the
introduction of the present bill.
General DUNNE thought it was the duty of the Go-
vhem anernment to afford the information, and in order to give
t opportunity, he moved that the debate be ad-
journed.
Mr. HENLEY also thought that the Irish law officers
ought to give the information required.
The SOLICITOR-GENERAL for IRLELAND said
he was anxious to hear the opinions of hon. members
before he addressed the house. He contended that on the
introduction of the measure his right hon. friend the
Attorney-General gave the most perfect and complete
explanations of the provisions of the bill, and he was
astonished to find that a bill which was base
on the unanimous opinion of the legal. opposed.
profes-
sion in Ireland was so stremurisly.ri Ft.'.
i Ireland
Te general opinion of all par
be extended to Ireland.
therefore the English system sboulda _
_ress.ng
i the house at
The hon. and learned member was di
debate ceased, in accord-
bctbuyet
aBnI
ia wasl
it.ehlaatn
dthewcaosurbsaed,ofthpraotetehdautreefoftheiaCnotdiuerwst:ef
geed, Chancery
and
BANICRUP
aantawrtei;tothseixe,taatndwinhgichertdc
In reply to Mr. AY. OR T
st ,
orropwitsont it was proposed to pro-
f had been
made to the Attorne)
n-1(1 be the first order.
not taken supply
I teed MThr ;es' (ji
housetlhi ltih
v"d'ourned.
nldGeneral for postponement. If it was
ipst
hElllif to's::

= -
GLOUCESTER, May 7.—Wind S.W.—Arrived—Minorca,
!rem Trieste
PLYMOUTH, May 7.—Wind pot",
:or gelNurne.