The Sun.
London, England, 1835-08-19 00:00:00

HE SUN, L Y
oNtDON, WEDNPSDA, Ateregt
T 11.

SPANISh tX_I4.BI3ITIOP.

411!:, • • *.f.n y
(FRO3f OUR ous CoßitEsiqThri.ENT!)
Plymouth, Monday Evening, Aug. 17.
The Ronal Tar steamer, Captain Symmons, arrived here
last eir;enVg• froni,WdOlWieh;ifqt the purpop of embarking
part or the recruits wlio had been ct;T:ect. here, arid, in
other parts of the west of England, for the service or the
Queen of Spain. She had on board, when she arrived here,
three hundred of the 3d Infantry, who had embarked at Wool-
wich, and in consequence could only receive 170 of the re
ereitS ~htre.l These, tstte e.:lthffl#o.4.!ez,dny et 1:h m place form
part of the 4th, or Queen's Own Fusileers. gelling tits
board they were each furnished with a pair of new canvass
trowsers and smock-frock, and were paid the bounty money of
21. Before layding, in Spain they will be furnished with a
a 6CAliplete
We visited the Roy al Tar this afternoon, and from
vcrsation with sgvcral of the men learned that a general sa-
tisfaetioil Orfadtld 6011; and that all they had been promised
they had duly feceiiied. She left ihig tart ttikttat five o'clock
this aftefndon; fqf St. Andero, arid ftditt the iteitthet being
favourable tdin tiilt ifidst tifdtidtilf tisQc rt t elide pilsoge, 13g.
fore leaving; the nienzdve. thitce hearty Cheefs not com-
manding Oftic:Cf; .114apii• Slart6: ''here;
,Has been only one
ingdneki Of degdi'tiOn tide, diid that ilid iiift of the
man who deserted having an aversion to accornpatt,
across the Bay of Biscay.
The following are the officers of the 4th Fusilecrs who ac-
cornpahlodothe men from hence
Majors--Apthorpe and Cannata. •
Captains—P. Ramsay and W. R. Waddell.
First Lieutenants—Fl. Palmer, J. W. Bell, G. Macdonald,
and W. I-I C. Carnaby.
Second Lieutenants—NV. Johnson, W. Kirby, W. Story,-
J. G. Kempe, and J. Hornbrook.
Assistant- Surgeon—B. Mould.

SPORTING INTELLIGENCE.

~~_~.

HEATON PARK RACES.
ENTRIES.

The Heston Park Stakes of 25 sovs. each, 15 ft, and only 5 if de-
clared on or before the Ist of September. One mile and a half.
Lord Chesterfield's Glaucas, 3 yrs, 9st. 91b.
Mr. Heseltine's Physician, 6 yrs, 9st. 31b.
Mr. Etwall's Revenge, 5 yrs, Bst. 91b.
Mr. Wheeldon's Giovanni, aged, Bst. 81b.
Mr, Artiold tianles independence, aged, Bst. 71b.
Mr. Hill names David, 8 yrs, Bst. ,lb.
Mr. W. Edwards's Prince Llewellyn, 5 yrs, Bst. 21b.
Count Matuschewitz names Prince, 6 yrs, Bst. 21b.
Lord Wilton's Languish, 5 yrs, Bst. 21b.
Sir J. Gerard's Trepidation, b yrs, Bst. 21b.
Mr. Townley's Algiers, I) yrs, Bst. 21b.
Lord Stanley's Falconbridge, 6 yrs, Bst.
Mr. Ferguson's Rust, s.yrs, 7st. 101 b.
Mr. Crockford names Pussy, 4 yrs, 7st. 91b.
Lord R. Grosvenor names Lady Le Gros, 4 yrs, 7st. 91b.
Mr. E. Peel's Tarick, 4 yrs, 7st. 91b.
Captain Byng's Peacemaker, 5 yrs, 7st. 91b.
Mr. E. Peel's Tamworth, 4 yrs, 7st. 71b.
Mr. Johnson's Jupiter, 3 yrs, 7st. Sib.
Mr. Lacey's Frantic, 4 yrs, 7st. 41b.
Mr. Irby names The Captain, aged, 7st. 41b.
Mr. Hobson's Whitefoot, 4 yrs, 7st. 31b.
Mr. Houldsworth's Darius, 4 yrs, 7st. 21b.
Mr. J. H. Peel's Peregrine Pickle, 6 yrs, 7st.
Earl of Lichfield's Bon Ton, 4 yrs, 7st.
Mr. R. Turner's Fearnhurst, 4 yrs, 7 st.
Lord G. Bentinck's Vulpas, 4 yrs, 6st. 131 b.
Sir R. W. Bulkelev's Radical, 5 yrs, 6st. 61b.
Colonel Anson's Clarionet, 3 yrs, 6st. 61b.
Lord Chesterfield's Griselda, 3 yrs, 6st. 51b.
Mr. Barrow's b. c. by Lanza, 3 yrs, 6st. 31b.
Mr. Osbaldeston's f. by Humphrey Clinker-Pousette, 2 yrs.

STOCKTON RACES, SATURILIY.
A Sweepstakes of 10 soy& each, p. p., for two yrs old; colts, Bst.
31b. ; fillies, Bst. Once round, nearly a mile. 5 subs.
Mr. J. Smith's br. f. by Jerry Cartwright 1
Mr. Bell's br. f. by Langar
Mr. Wormald's Zelinda
Mr. Attwood's Lithuanian •
The Selling Stake—A Sweepstakes of 10 sovs. each, p. p., for all
ages. The winner to be sold for 100 sovs., if demanded, &c.
One mile and a half. 5 subs.
Mr. Heseltine's Lydia Languish, 4 yrs Heseltine 1
Mr. Chilton's b. f. by Remnant, 4 yrs
Mr. Fox's Mrs. Oakley, 4 yrs
Mr. Loy's Lelevo, 6 yrs 4
Captain Pott's Enchantress' 4 yrs
Enchantress having crossed Lydia Languish, she was declared
distanced, and the race given to Lydia Languish.
A Handicap Stakes of 5 sovs. each, with 25 added. Two mile heats.

5 subs.
Mr. Jaques's Burletta, 3 yrs, 7st. 31b ... 1 1 -
Mr. Bowes's Oblivion, .4 yrs, 7st. 111 b 4 2
Mr. Fox's Mrs. Oakley, 4 yrs, 7st. 91b ... 3 3
Mr. Attwooa's Calista, 3 yrs, Est. 31b

OF THE PUBLIC JOURNALS.

Thk /grdS.rnacie great strides last fright in the further
demotitioli et i 1.4 Wltinieipaf geforro Bill, all the clauses
of which (with the exception of those' posipmicd, and the
schedules) have gone through the Committee. When the
Bill as amended is printed, it will hardly have one feature
in cerniUl kith that sent up from the Commons. In an
early part of the eveintig Melbourne declared that " so
much bad been done to render 1.'116 Dill inefficient, that he
would not make any strenuous opposition 4.4 the tnnend-
meet then under discussion (for continuing the presedt
tices oftped66lo t
hetreetglia),. nor would he to any amend-
ment that migh liereaffee be toade, seeing that it was al-
most useless. But. when these amencht"ts were adopted,
it would then become a matter of serious eargAde-ration,
whether he the circumstances, it would be well to go on
further with the iticaanre." One of the most mischievdtis
of the amendments carried last night was that proposed
by Lord Ellcnborough, for dividing all towns hav-
ing 0,000 inhabitants, and fewer than 9,000, into
twei wards, from 9,000 to 15,000 into three wards,
and front 15,000 to 18,000 into four words, and so on in the
same proportion ; and that those having between 55,000
and 80000 should be divided into eight wards. The ob-
ject of this minute division may be understood without
much difficulty, eepseillly when taken in conjunction with
the giving to the Magistrates of the districts adjoining the
boroughs (in four cases out Of five rank Tories) the power
of dividing the towns into wards. Indeed, Lord Win-
chilsea did not scruple to say, that as no one could doubt
bat the Bill was brought forward for party purposes, to de-
press one party and raise another (the party raised being
the nation, with the exception of the Tory Oligarchs and
their creatures !), the amendment would counteract that
effect. We will not fatigue our readers by a minute
notice of the various CO
tcrations made last night. It would
be a libel on the Commons {osuppose that they will sane-
tiori alterations which have compie:.?v changed. the cha-
racter of the ttiedffare. The Lords have u.7"n feeling the
pulse of the nation gild of the Commons. ,pv have,
as usual, been labouring . Wider strange infatua::"n
with regard to the indifference of the entry to good
Government. Intleed, what can be expected from men who •
have no fellowship with me people, and are the 'dupess of
every silly tale that is told than by their creatures. For
instance, what could be more silly that! the statement of
the Earl of Galloway last night, that Mr. Dotistlas, lately a
candidate for the repreSetitation of Glasgow, had made se-
ditious speeches with the red caV df liberty on his head ?
Mr. Douglas was suddenly called on to §tp*mk from an inn
window at a small town in the South of Scotland, in the
month of January, and he happened to have his travelling
cap on. No man but one ignorant mad utterly unacquainted
with the character and habits of the people of Scotland,
would have swallowed such an absurdity. Lord Galloway
may be taken for a sample of his order. But the L'o'rrls
will soon be undeceived. However, we will not anticipatd
the proceedings of the eventful days on which we are about
to enter. We leave the Lords to the Representatives of
the Empire, in full conAtleitce that they and the Ministers
will do their duty.—Morning Chroitiele,
Our columns might be perfectly inundated this day, as
well as during the last ten days, with reports of Municipal
Reform meetings, which crowd in upon us from all parts of
the country. - In every instance the people have expressed
their determination to have nothing to do with the amend-
ments of the Lords ; and call on the House of Commons to
reject them. Our space precludes these reports F hut some
remarks made by Mr. J. Shaw Stewart, at the great Edin-
burgh meeting last Thursday, are worthy of being struck
out, by extract into more prominent relief than the great
and uniform inscription of the public will, which like the
handwriting on the wall at Babylon announces the weighing
.in the balance of " absurd pomp," and the passing away of
the reign of privileged injustice. Mr. Stewart expressed
himself as follows ;
" He would say baldly, and he thought it was impossible to
deny it, that the motive which bad caused the majority of the
House of Peers to adopt the extreme course they bad taken
with regard to this Bill was one which scarcely could be
avowed, and which certainly could not stand the test of Con-
stitutional investigation, One great objection to this Bill was,
the effect it would give to the freer scope and louder expres-
sion of liberal opinions in the country. It was not denied that
it would give strength to the Liberal party, the defeat and sub-
version of which was one of their dearest objects. This ob.:
ject, however, the House of Lords ought not and could not
avow, because it was at variance with the first principles of the
Constitution. They were now making the last struggle to
maintain that corrupt influence in the country which was first,
in part, wrested from them by the great act of Reform, and to
which this last Bill, they were aware, would put a final end.
They were now, therefore, met there to give expression to the
opinion embodied in the resolutions he was about to submit,
that the Bill for Ileferming the Coporations of England was of
vital importance to the stability of the Throne, the preserva-
tion of the Conititntion, and to the peace and prosperity of the
empire. He would say, that with regard to the House of Lords
themselves, it Was of the last and most vital importance that
the Bill should pass. They had placed themselves, by their
opposition to it, in a false and perilous situation, and it became
the friends of the Constitution, and of the peace of the coun-
try, to interfere and to tell the House of Lords that they could
not be permitted, in their blind infatuation of clinging to abuses,
to endanger the existence of even their own branch of the Le-
gislature, with the privileges of which the people of this coun-
try had no desire to intermeddle. They must, therefore, be
awakened from their dream, the treacherous, wild, and perilous
dream, in which they were now indulging, and the continuance •
of which might involve the ruin of their own order."
We might extract from other forcible speeches ; but con-
sidering the fatal nature of the Lords' amendments to the
principle of the Bill, the discussion loses its interest. What
is done is done. Tice Bill is lost, as Lord Brougham em-
phatically said, and further argument expended on the
measure, or further warning wasted on Lordly infatuation,
are useless. As Hainkt says, they are " words, words,
words," and the people must now bethink them of pre-
paring themselves for acts. For ourselves, we feel inclined
to rest on our arms and wait the issue. It is the affair of
the Lords. They have themselves brought on the crisis.
They have mutilated the people's Bill, and the people will
place the mistreated and maimed abortion of the infatuated
Peerage on the steps of their Lordships' door, to do with
it as they please--"Diseite nzoic Reges.—Bc wise now, oh,
ye Kings !,---be instructed, oh, ye judges of the earth !"
Morning Advertiser,

The Lords have now forced the ecmntry to the verge of
a convulsion, and it is now proper that we should not dis-
guise the fact, but look our dancer in the face, and provide
iagainst the consequences. It is not the Municipal Bill
only which has been gullotined, and returnesilike a mummy,
with the form preserved, but the vital principle extinct.
Other measures arc fated to undergo a similar process of
butchering—the Irish Church and Corporation Bills, and
the anti-Imprisonment for Debt Bill have all but received
judgment—the righteous judges have put en the fatal sym-
bol—the black cap has been mounted, sentence is passed,
and ,the State executioner, Lord Lyndhurst, is preparing
for discharging the duty of his obnoxious office. It would
be folly in the people of Great Britain to pretend to free-
dom- if they sulenit to the principles audaciously
asserted in the Upper House. The object and end of
the Lords is the perpetuity of plunder, and the coma-
-dation of despotic authority. Witness the Lynd-
horst antendinents to the Corporation Bill, and the
opposition of Lord Harewood to the anti-Imprisonment
!or Debt Bill, on the ground that it was " most arbitrary
and tyrannical" to expose their Lordships' property to the
payment of their debts, their persons being already exempt,
and that the commoners, as if they were o a different spe•
cies, should not be freed from the horrors of incarceration.
The-trade negotiated on such a principle is a perfect slave
trade—it is an ex post fiwto disposal of a man's person in
lieu of his debts ;—but if the system continue, why should
Peers be held exempt from its provisions? There are,
however, at the moment, graver topics to discuss than even
the injustice of giving creditors power over the liberty of
their debtors—and the first in importance is the arrogant
exercise, by the Lords, of their undue authority over the
liberties of the nation. They daringly assert their right
to " CHECK AND CONTROL" the people's representatives.
This must not endure, nor be endured. Our fathers
have left us some cheering examples of maintaining right
against prerogative. Look with what • success the
" Liing Parliament" annulled tonnage and poundage,
resisted ship-money, abolished the Star Chamber, cur-
:tailed prerogative, and castigated a domineering priesthood. I
The measures which we have to support are as essential to
the prosperity and ultimate tranquillity of the State. Have
Englishmen degenerated ? If not, when our insults, our
wrongs, and our oppressions are as great, why not prove
that,' our indignation, our courage, our talents, and our
power are equal to carry us as triumphantly through the
struggle against tyranny now as that of our ancestors was
by the Pyrns and Hampdens ? There is a meeting of the
inhabitant householders of the parish of St. Paul, Covent-
garden, to be held this day, to consider the propriety of pe-
titioning the Commons to reject the alterations made by the
Lords in the Municipal Bill. This activity deserves the
utmost praise, but we consider our fellow, citizens might di-
rest their deliberations to more more appropriate subjects,
namely, What is. to be done- with 11w House ql Lords?
—What benefits have the people ever derived from
hereditary legislation ? What are the best means of pro-
viding in
future against such injurious excitements as have
been provoked by the hostility which the, Lords have, on
all occasions, exhibited against the progress of popular
rights ? If every measure of amelioration can be carried
only by such irresistible musters of the popular forces as,
were called together in support of the Catholic Relief
Bill—the great Reform Bill, and oiher-Bills which the
liberal intelligence of the age made imnerative—we say it
were better that hereditary-legislation were abolished alto-
gether, than that it should continue seeli system of in-
convenience and danger. It is to these subjetes the at-
tention- of real ReNffflus should now be -adace;:,w-d, and

sincerely do we 1416:112)0 in the meetings, which will no
doubt be called in this eiiiiat 6-I,',Vetnity throughout every
extremity throdghout every city gtyl itioct in the empire,
they will receive that calm consideration wilich their im-
portance requires, and that the nation will make a de-
termined effort to carry a just decision into immediate ope-
ration. The despots, to use their own words, "dare us to
a trial of strength,"—our reply is brief—we accept the
ehallengc:
" Lay on, Alac&ti!
" And damn'd be 1,,th0 first cries, Hold ! enough t"
—Morning Advertiser.

In an evening paper of Saturday last we find in the Par-
liamentary report the following passage in a speech of Mr.
C. Buller :—" The lion. and Learned Member then ad-
verted to the large demand there was for cheap publications.
While the Times and the Dispatch circulated only about
aotpco each per week, the Penny Magazine sold 200,000
copier in the same time." It is curious that in the four
principal Morning Papers no such remark is reported, and
that as far us 'we have seen, it appears only in a journal
with which :he Hon. Member (we know not how truly) is
generally said to l?e connected. Be that as it may, we have
one word to say on tuP observation itself. We shall not
condescend to comment on the honourable attempt of Mr.
C. Buller to depreciate the amout:+ of our circulation, when
;,e
a moment's inquiry at the Stamp.„,flit would have shown
his statement to be grossly inaccurate, bu: we will go at
once to his allegation about the cheapness of the
Penny Magazine. Now we pronounce that publicaon to
be almost incalculably dearer than the Times. The 77m..7,
including the price of the stamp, is sold for 7d.
The Penny Magazine, which has no fourpenny stamp
to pay, and does not contain more than a sixth part of the
matter of the Times, is sold for a penny ; the matter of the
cheap mieazine is a mere scissor-compilation from other
works : there are no Parliamentary reporters, no law re-
porters, no police reporters to be paid : no writers of origi-
nal discussion : no correspondence : no expresses, foreign
or domestic. Such a journal, compared with the Times.
or any well-conducted Morning Paper, would be dear if
sold at the rate of six for a farthing. And yet the Hon.
Mein for. Liskeard, in the plenitude of his ignorance,
calls this a "cheap publication." It was said of the most
agreeable, thoug,l' not the best, writer of the last century,
that " nihil tetigit quo'] non ornavit :" from the specimens
which we have seen of 1:-.e Parliamentary career of the
member for Liskeard we should say " nihil ornavit quod te-
-401. His very scanty modicum of talent and knowledge
makes him an easy dupe, while his self-opinion blinds him
to his error even when it is visible to all the world.
Lord Ellenborough once said of a dull witness who was
indulging in some figure of speech, " Really such a man
should not venture upon metaphor." We would with de-
ference suggest to Mr. C. Buller, that he should make
" his power the limit of his will," and not venture to touch
open subjects beyond his strength or beyond his knowledge.
tie has lately been found sadly wanting on the important
question of the Mauritius, of which he had assumed the
management. We will undertake to predict that he will
other as few laurels in his new field of operations against
the stamped Press. We do not know whether we may
think it worth our while to descend into the arena with
him, but there is no lack of ability in several of our con-
temporaries to give him a regular " Cornish hug." We
beg to assure this Hon. Gentleman, that we bear him no
ill-will, and that our observations are dictated by a feeling
of compaision for one who seems likely to commit himself.
If we were malicious, we should adopt the policy of Addi-
son, and let him flounder on till be became inextricably in,
volved in error and absurdity.—Times.
It is absurd to insinuate, as some of our contemporaries
do, that many of the People of England have been in-
duced to send up petitions to the House of Lords in sup-
port of parts of the new Corporation Bill, against which
the majority of their own representatives, the representa-
tives of England in the reformed Parliament, have voted.
No ! no ! The people of Ireland, the people of Scotland,
call upon the Lords to pass our English Corporation Bill
without alteration, because the majority of
.the representa-
tives of those portions of the empire have so voted for the
bill ; but the people of England do not call upon their own
freely-chosen representatives to bow the head to Scotch and
Irish Members, the latter chosen everybody knows how,
upon a question purely English. Upon the most important
division in the Commons House of Parliament, there was
but a majority of 28 in favour of the Bill ; but of the
English Members, there were 179 for it, and 194 against
it ; thus giving a majority of 15 English Members against
it. To the manner in which the Irish Members
have been returned to Parliament—namely, under the
denunciation that those who voted against them should
have their houses marked out for destruction, each by a
skull-and cross-thighbones, and their persons for murder
—it is now unnecessary to allude ; but with respect to the
wish of the Scotch gentlemen who would reform our Cor-
porations contrary to the vote of our own Members, we
would beg leave to ask•how they have reformed their own ?
The story is really full of laughter and mirth, except that
it has a melancholy conclusion. First of all the Whigs
appoint "a commission of inquiry" into the state and con-
dition of the Scotch Corporations ! (Every sentence of
this narrative deserves a note of admiration thus (!), for it
discloses a tissue of absiirdity.) They then determine to
reform, as they call it, the Corporations, without waiting
for the Report of their own commission! " They legis-
late first,", as Lord Haddington says, "and enquire after-
wards." They put the cart before the horse. The
Corporations being thus reformed, now comes out the
Report of their own Commissioners, condemning all
that had been done, and justifying all t;:e pre-
dictions of mischief that had been uttered against the
plan of reform which they had adopted ! God for-
bid that we should say the Scotch corporations did not
need reform. We know they needed it greatly. But is
this the way in which statesmen go to work on a subject of
such vast importance? Are these Legislators ? Arid are
Scotch corporations thus reformed to be held out as models
to us, or Scotch corporators to be listened to, when they •
petition that our corporations may be made like theirs ;
and that, contrary to the voice and vote of our own English
members, in Parliament assembled ? And then how has
this cart-before-the-horse system of Reform operated in
Glasgow ? Most gloriously. "Town counsellors have
been elected, who were on oath certified to be so poor, as
to be unable to advance the smallest sum to the poor-rate ;
others, who were but lately bankrupts, and newly discharged
by their creditors have been chosen." All this may be
very right ; for, being poor, it is fit and proper that they
should be maintained out of the corporation funds! What is
the use of requiring a qualification for the office of town-coun-
sellors ? Men with such a qualification have no need of
the corporation property. Give it to those who want it.,
to be sure ! But softly,. what has been the end of this
system in Glasgow ? " The burgh council is fallen into
utter contempt ! The burgh funds have suffered severe
dilapidations" under the management of these gentry ! and
they talk of resorting to a "poll-tax to replace what they
have dissipated !" This is rather awkward. However,
Lord .Brougham says, that " he can get a genuine petition
signed by 30,000 inhabitants of Glasgow, declaring that
their Bill works well." No doubt he can ; no doubt of it.
But, without paying any attention either to the information
of Lord Lyndhurst on one side, or the assertion of Lord
"-ou,rham on the other, we would beg leave to ask, what
1'" 9 fa
cts ? Have " the burgh funds suffered severe
are tta.'
dilapidiaiou: ?" And " are they talking of resorting to
Why, Lord Brougham himself acknow-
a poll-tax: ?"
ledges, in his
,gpc,-
~,Is of Monday night, that he does not
hle funds into the hands of his
like to trust the diatil...:
give
would
them the ower.
new counsellors, though liep
" He admitted"—these are his words—" I admit
very
it to, be some addi-
t4. ,hat, as to charitable funds, there 09
tional control over the governing body': !! ; this is saying
a g:eat deal for your friends, kind Lord nro.:.'sci.ham, the
30,000 signers (of whom you boast) to the ue,7!,.zatione
that the burgh system works well. What nonsense ! as !c
those who had the power, and were needy, would not be '
sure to get the money. And now, as to Lord Brougham's
objection to the clause that some of the town-council should,
under whatever name, be chosen for life. Our own view of
the subject is, that provided they be chosen by the people
or rate-payers at large, and not elected by the body of'
which they are to form a part, or, in other words, provided
1 that the governing body be not either wholly or in any part
self-elected, the measure, though not one which we altoge-
ther like, is not very objectionable. But, in any case, Lord
Brougham was not the man to object to this principle of
permanence in a part of the burgh council, for it formed an
esseotial part of his own bill of corporation reform intro-
duced by him and read a second time, August 22, 1833.
We present the proof of our assertion to our readers :
" And be it enaciee, that on the 3d day of January, after
the granting of any charter to any such borough as aforesaid,
the common council pf such borough shall elect and appoint
for each of the wards thereof one of themselves to be an alder-
man of such borough, and every such alderman shall hold his
office during his natural life,, except in the cases hereinafter
mentioned ; and in case a vacancy shall be occasioned in the
office of aldermen for any such borough, by reason of any per-
son who shall have been elected to such office not accepting
the same in the. manner hereafter mentioned, or by reason of
his dying or ceasing to hold the said office for any of the
causes hereinafter mentioned, the common council of such bo-
yoegh shall within 14 days after such vacancy fleet and ap-
:point one of themselves to be an alderman in the place of the
person so occasioning such vacancy."—Clause 20.
We don't really think Lord Brougham entitled to this
`fiotice ; but what are we to do ? He is the only man
that says any thing about the matter in the Upper House ;
for as to Yiseouut Melbourne, the head of the Administra-
tion (an excellent and accomplished gentleman,) he has, we
suspect, never given himself tare trouble to read the Bill ;
in which respect we think he treats his shabby allies, the
Radical Reformers, very aeurvily ; though perhaps not
woree than they des,,,yre—yet not at his hands. He would