The Sun.
London, England, 1866-04-30 00:00:00

Me Reform Debate.

The following is a list of the members of the
House of Commons who took part in the debate oe
the Reform Bill :--

IN FAVOUR OF TILE }SILL.
Allen, W. S.
Acland, T. D.
Baines, E.
Bright J.
Baxter, W. E.
Crossley, Sir F.
Coleridge, J. D.
Childers, H. C. E.
Fawcett, H.
Forster, W. E.
Gaselee, Sergeant S.
Grosvenor, Captain
Goldsmid, Sir F.
Grey, Sir G.
Graham, W.
Gibson, Milner
Gower, Hon. P. L.
Goschen, Right Hon. G. J.
Gladstone, Right Hon. W. E.
Hoary, Sir H.
Hanbury, R. C.
Hibbert, T. J.
Hartington, Marquis
Hutt, Sir W.
Hughes, T.
Hodgkinson, G.
Harvey R. J. H.
James, E.
Kinglake, A. W.
King, L.
Leatham, W. H.
Layard, A. H.
Leeman, G.
Martin, C. W.
Martin, P. W.
Mill, J. S.
Maguire, J. F.
Otway, A. J.
O'Donoghuo, The
Philips, R. N.
Peel, A.
Simeon, Sir J.
Torrens, W. M'Cullagh
Taylor, P.
Villiers, Right Hon. C. P.
Young, G.

lIN OPPOSITION TO THE 13111.
Adderley, Right lion. C•
peach, Sir M. H.
Bromley, W. D.
Butler-Johnstone, S. A.
Cranbourne, Lord
Cairns, Sir H.
Dutton, Hon. R. H.
Dunkellin, Lord
Doulton, F.
Duff, R. W.
Duucombe W.
Disraeli, Right Hon. B.
Elcho, Lord
Fergusson, Sir J.
Grosvenor, Earl
Gregory, W. H.
Grant, A.
Hardy, J.
Horsfall, T. B.
Horseman, Right lion.
Hope, A. J. B.
Hardy, G.
Knightley, Sir R.
Laing, S.
Lowe, Right Hon. B.
Long, R. p.
Lytton, Sir B.
Liddell, Hon. H. G.
Lowther, J.
Marsh, M. H.
Montagu, Lord R.
Miller, W.
M'Kenna, J. M.
Northcote, Sir S.
Newdegate, C. W.
Pim, J.
Peel Right Hon. General
Royston, Lord
Schreiber, C.
Stanley, Lord
Stanhope, J. B.
Selwin, H. W.
Whiteside, Right Hon. J•
Walpole, Right lion. S.
Yorke, J. R.

ELECTION COMMITTEES—This PLY'

HUDDERSFIELD. at
The members of this committee re-assembled to day
eleven o'clock.
Mr. Temple, Q.C., said that the case on the part of tilet
petitioners stood over from Saturday in the hope thsd,
Spencer, for whose arrest a warrant had been graute a
might be brought before the committee. That object ,119,0
not been effected, and therefore the petitioner's case

closed.
Mr. Rodwell, Q.C., on behalf of the sitting ruen3-.1,1,:f;
addressed the committee. He said that from the man it
in which the case on the other side had been conducteo,,a
t
would be necessary for him not only to defend tm;
seat for Colonel Crossland, but also to vinclicgat
his character, which was even of greater importallee',,ftea
he was a native of Huddersfield and highly reeP°,,o
in the neighbourhood. The evidence which he
call could be implicitly relied on, and 1(°- her
contrast strongly with the witnesses called on the °e
side, who were raked up from the back slums of illicicieaar
field. With regard to the watchers who had been
ployed by Colonel Crossland, he would prove that
were necessary in consequence of the violence °_,f the
Leathamites, which rendered protcctien to his flt°- tit
indispensable. A great deal had been heard il-bl.lt
the proceedings at tho Nottingham electioul tiot
they were insignificant compared with tbose e
took place at the last election at Huddersfield, vidtert
pot
Riot Act had to be read, and the military called out. foo
of 300 watchers employed not more than 10 or 1-21.00
voters, and the evidence of the police would satit
committee that the state of Huddersfield was I°3- f
°
described. He adverted to the opening stater° to
counsel as to 12 cases of personal bribery attributed to
Colonel Crossland, only one of which it was attealte

prove. to
Witnesses were then called, and the inquiry i 5 lacell
last two days.

KING'S COUNTY.
The inquiry in this case was resumed this mornil3lol ad
witnesses were called to confirm the evidence alrod)..,°
duced on the part of the petitioner, Mr. Pope 1:1011°'

the unsuccessful candidate.
CHELTENHAM. ti°il
Further evidence was given in support of the Pe
against the return of Mr. Schrceber.
t Ili°
ROSSINI, at his last soiree in Paris, treated r le
admirers to four now compositions : the " Toast P°,lses)r
noun el an," "Le Depart des Pronis" (two Cl'el
" Tirana," au air and r014411C0 on a SiDgle 11(3°.