The Sun.
London, England, 1866-11-21 00:00:00

99 100
91 93

121 13
5i 5 d
el e 3
83 85

71} WI
101 103,
85 90
bi 88

82 E 5
98 99
98 03
1} 1
98 99

12i I

102 a
93y

---
COLONIAL GOVERNMENT SECURITIES.
- -
British Columbia, 6 per
Cent., Dec.3l, 1572.... 100 -
Can.Gov.6 p.c.Ja.&July
1877-84
- Do, 6p. a. Feb. & Aug.. 1 0 90 92
Do. sp. c. Mar. & Sept 100 90 42
- Do. sp. c. Jan. & July 130 76 78 771
- Do. sp. c. Inscribed ak 100 75 77
- Cape G.Hope, 6 p.c. 1873 100 103 105
Do.Apl.&Oct 16'30-1900 100 162 104
Do. do; 1880-96 100 112 104
- Do. Jan.&July, 1890-91 too 163 Its
- Do. 5 per cent. 15 April
and :5 Oct., 1900 lOO 87 8)4
- Ceylon, Nov 180, 6 P., 100 1(3 105
- Do. 1878, do lOO 106 Iva
sLittritius, p. C, 16;-3,
- fan. and July
- Do. 1.78
o. !88.?, May 15, Nov..: 10 ! 115 107
- Do. 1895, Feb. & Aug lOO lt6 108
- Antal 'toy. 8 per cent lOl 96 100
N.B.Goy.6p.c.Ja.&July luo 90 .02
- N. S.W. Gov. 5 p•c.,lBe(. 100 90 92
- Do. 5 p.c. 18;1 to 187 lOO 00 ~?;`,
Do. 5 p.c. 1888 to 1893 .0:) 8!: 87
- 3ew Zealand, 6p. cent 100 96 98
- Do. 5 per cent.— 100 e 2 84
- Nova Sc ,tia Gov. 6p. c
sterling, 1875 lOO 96 98
- Queensland Gov. 6p. c lOO 95 06 951
- 6. Aus.Gov. 6 p,o 1888-• 100 -- -
- Do. 1878 & upwards 1! 0 106 108
- Vio,Uov. 6 p.c. Ja &July 100 - -
- Do. do, April & Oct lOO 1034 1044
BRITISI4 MINES.
Cam Consol. i,oid, Btu 1
Chiverton
- Clifford A malgamated. 30 6 7
Devon G. Cons. (Taoist. 1 4.5 435
urakewalls 2.1.0 4 t
- East Bassett (Illogani 294 22 24
- East Caradon 2.14.6 5 6
- East Earn Brea 3l 2 3
- Nast Grenville
- East Gunnislake .. 8.3.0
- East Love.l 3.9.0 11 12
- E. W'l Russell (Tavistk 10.8.3 2} 21
- StAubyn(G wen. 66 5 6
4 Orca.t L txey, limited all 18 19
- Great South Tolgus 0.14.0 -
Great Wheal Busy 14.9.6 - -
- G. Wheal Vor (Heist 40 17 18 17
- (3 renvilie 8.18.0 14 11
- Ilerod's Foot 8.10.0 29 31
- tlingston Downs 5.10.6 24 04
- Margaret (Uny Lelant 1317.6 2 4
51arke Valley 8.10.6 44 5
4 ,llwyndy Iron Ore, lim 34 24 14d
- New Seton
- North Rcskear
N.Wh'l Bassett(lllogan 4.4.0 - -
North Whe,4l Crotty 2.13., 14
- Prosper United...„, „ 7.1.6 _
- Providence Uny Lelant 10.6.7 2-1 26
- S. Caradon (St. Cleer) l4 310 330
- South Condurrow
B.Wheal Fran. (Illogran 18.18.9 18 22
-. Stray Park . 35.15,6
- Tin Croft 9 7 9
5 7igra and Chgan, lim, all 3 5
- West :,assett (11 logan 16 1 2
- W. Caradon (Liskeard 12 15 17
- West Chirerton ....... . 11 59 60
- West Seton 474 130 140
_ Wheal Bassett (Mogan 54 75 85
- Wheal Buller (Redrutli 16 19 20
Wheal Mary Ann (Men. 8 10 12
Wheal Seton
__ Whcal Trelawney (Lis. 5.17.0 7 9

LAW INTELLIGENCE.—This Day.

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS.
(Sittings at Nisi Prius before Mr. Justice Smith and a
Common Jury.)
BARNARD V. SOLOMONS.

The hearing of this case, which was reported in yester-
day's Sun, was resumed this morning, and occupied the
greater part of the day.
The jury found a verdict for the plaintiff for the full
amount claimed.
(Sittings in Banco before the Lord Chief Justice and

Justices Willes and Keating.)

LINGARD V. KIRKI'ATRICK AND OTHERS-LIABILITY OF

MASTERS.

Mr. Monk, Q.C., appeared to show cause to-day against
a rule which had been obtained by the defendants to set
aside a verdict which had been obtained by the plaintiff
for £lO, and to enter a nonsuit. The defendants
were the proprietors of an omnibus that plied
between Denton and Manchester. The plaintiff,
an elderly female, travelled by it, and when she
came to Manchester desired the conductor to hail another
omnibus which was going in a different direction. He did
so, and helped her out, but the omnibus did not stop, and
he let her fall to the ground, by which she sustained inju-
ries that laid her up for a fortnight. She brought her action
against the defendants for compensation on the alleged
ground of negligence of the conductor. The defendants
denied that the negligence was of a nature that ren-
dered them liable. The learned counsel contended
that even the sanctioning of the plaintiff getting out of the
omnibus while it was in motion amounted to negligence on
the part of the conductor. He referred to the case of
Coleman and the South-Eastern Railway Company, in
which all the learned judges, with the exception of the
Lord Chief Baron, were in favour of the verdict for the
plaintiff, the fact being that the child, while in one of the
company's carriages, had his thumb jammed in the door,
which was held to be a negligence of the porter,
for which the company were liable, as it took
place in the discharge of his ordinary duty. The
evidence of the plaintiff had been confirmed by the con-
ductor of the other omnibus, and under the circumstances
he trusted the Court would not make the rule absolute.

Mr. biker appeared in support of the rule, and con-
tended that the accident was caused through the negligence
of the plaintiff, who in her haste to get out did not use
the precaution of waiting until the omnibus stopped. The
case referred to on the other side was peculiar, for it had
been proved that there was 'unnecessary force and quick-
ness. in the closing of the door, which led to the accident.
The Court suggested that the plaintiff should consent to
staying the proceedings with a view to an arrangement
between the parties, which was agreed to by her counsel,
and no order was made.

Central Criminal Court.—This Day.

--~-

OLD COURT.
(Before Mr. Baron Bramwell.)
THE CHARGE AGAINST TAE EARL OF SRAFTESBITRY'S

STEWARD.

An application was made this morning for a postpone-
ment of the trial of Robert Short Waters, the late steward
of the Earl of Shaftesbury, until the November Sessions
next year. Proceedings were going on in Chancery be-
tween the noble Earl and Mr. Waters, and Vice-Chancellor
Stewart had already given a decree against his lordship.
An appeal was lying before the Lords Justices against
that decree, but at present the appeal could not come on
for hearing ; and, under these circumstances, it was con-
sidered that it would be better that the charges of embezzle-
ment against Mr. Waters should be postponed.
Mr. Cole, on the part of the Earl of Shaftesbury, said he
had no objection to the postponement of the trial, particu-
larly as it was felt by the Earl of Shaftesbury that even if
a conviction should be obtained against the defendant it
would be very unsatisfactory, having regard to the present
state of the Chancery proceedings.
The trial was accordingly ordered to stand over until the
November Sessions next year.