The Sun.
London, England, 1832-02-02 00:00:00

TELLERS.

'Heron, Sir R.—Peterborough
272
32
---Ul4O

LIST OF FORTY-ONE MEMREfiS
-Who usually vote with Ministers for Relbrm, but who voted
on the 31st of January for a Committee' to inquire into the
State of the Glove Trade.
Bainbridge, T. E.—Taunton ' Morison, J.— Ipswich
Blackney, W.—Carlow Co. Mullins, F. W.—Co. of Kerry
Bentinck, Ld. G.—King's Lynn Mayhew, W.—Colchester
Blount, E.—Steering O'Connell, D.—Co. of Kerry
Buck, L. \V.—Exeter O'Connell, M. 11.—Co. of Clare
Buxton, J. J.—Bedwin Ossory, Earl of—Kilkenny Co.
Clive, E. B.—Hereford Russell, W.—Durham County
Copeland, Alderman—Coleraine Risthven, E. S.—Downpatrick
Dixon, J.—Glasgow, &c. Rickford, W.—Aylesbury
Ellis, W.—Leicester Sanford, E. A.--gornersetshire
Ferguson, Sir R.—Londonderry spencer, Hon. F.—Worcestersh.
Fotey, T. K.—Worcestershire Throckmorton, il —Brkshire
Gordon, It.—Cricklade IWason, R.—lpswith
Godson, R.—St. Alban's 'Watson, Hon. R.—Canterbury
Guise, Sir B. W.—Gloucestersh. Webb, E—Gloucester
Handley, W. F.—Newark Willoughby, Sir H.—Yarmouth,
Hodgson, J.—Newcastle-on-Ty. Isle of Wight
Hoskins, K.—Herefordshire Western, C. C.—Essex
flume, J.—Middlesex
Hunt, Henry—Preston TELLERS.
Langton, W. G.—Sornersetshire Davies, Colonel—Worcester
Lee, J. L.— Welli Robinson, G. IL—Worcester
For the Committee l6B
Against it ‘..M
Mai0rity...—........ .... • ............... ... ...... ---15

It has been the custom for many years for
Parliament, when sitting, to adjourn over the 30th of
January to avoid attending Divine Service on that day.
Why is not its religions observance, then, dispensed with
altogether? Surely aliat the highest authorities in th
land, including the whole bench of Bishops, abjure, cinnot
he a very binding duty upon the rest of the community.
REFORM PEERS.—We have looked into
the list of Dormant Peerages just published, and a strange
circumstance may occur in the division on the Reform
Bill. We find that the ancient earldom of Salisbury was
forfeited by the horrible execution and attainder of MAR-
'GARET PLANTAGENET, Countess of Salisbury, in the reign
of HENRY VIII., and the barony of Montague was for-
feited in the same reign by the execution of her son,
HENRY POLE, Lord Montague, the brother of Cardinal
REGINALD POLE ; the heirs of both were restored, in
blood and honour, by Act of Parliament, in the reign of
Prams and MARY, and their being no male issue, the
earldom and barony being both in fee, continued in abey
ance amongst the heir. of his two daughters, who married
Lord HASTINGS and Sir FRANCIS BARRINGTON. The
present .Marquis and Earl of SALISBURY, and the present
Baron MoterAcuz, both modern creations, are Anti-Re-
formers, and should the KING terminate the abeyance in
the ancient peerages in favour of Sir FITZWILLIAM BAR-
RINGTON, Bart., whose family have uninterruptedly pos-
sessed and resided on the royal manors held by the said
Countess of SALISBURY, we should have the strange ano-
maly of an Earl of SALISBURY and Baron MONTAGUE
voting for, and an Esri of SALISBURY and Baron MoN-
rAGulg voting against Reforra.—Dubliq Evening Post.
Though there has been a great stagnation,
almost amounting to a suspension of business in the money-
market, there is much excitement in the city generally,
respecting the position of the Ministry, and rumours of
other removals besides that of Sir HENRY PA RNELL have
been in active circulation. They are to be traced in a
great measure to the active exertions of the Tory party,
who are as much elated in the city as they have shown
themselves elsewhere, at any circumstance they have chosen
to consider as indications of weakness in the Administra-
tion. They point chiefly to the government of Ireland, and
to some of the minor posts in the Ministerial offices at
home, not very important as regards the character of the
kdministration, but of some consequence in regard to the
loss of Parliamentary influence, which these removals, it
ekeiceived, may occasion. We are not disposed to attach
'snuck c--edit to the se reports, but they have been urged
with so rauch vehemence, and have obtained belief in
quarters so revectable, that it would be a great omission,
in attempting to describe what is passing in the city, not
to advcrt to their eisterice. If capable of contradiction,
too, which is most pro)able the case, it will greatly tend
to relieve the minds of theme on whom they have made a
disagreable impression. There is no want whatever in the
city of the mast cordial feeling and good wishes for the
Ministry, and for the speedy ti iumph of the Reform Bill:
indeed, the anxiety manifested yesterday is an abundant
proof of it, but that feeling makes men of course more
anxious and irritable at the interruptions and difficulties
that seem to be thrown in the way.— Times.

Some discussion took place in the House of
Commons last night on the presentation of a petition from
Leeds in favour of the Bill fur limiting the hours of labour
for children in manufactories. Mr. JOHN MORRISON
(Banffshire) wished Scotland to be excluded en account of
the kind treatment to children in mat country. Creelat
.Ivderus Apella. We have received a statement from.
Dundee, which tells a very different tale. The Scof& are
a very good people in their way ; but they Ire as fond of
becoming rich as their neighbours, and if as tliing harshet
than the English. It is not easy, we addifel to protect a
poor population from the exactions of rich employers; and
there is much poverty in Scotland as well as in England.
The law, however, ought to attempt at least to protect
those whose tender age renders them unable to protect
themselves. The poor laws have nothing to do with the
question. In Lancashire there are few abuses in the poor
laws ; but we never beard that the people of Lancashire,
any mote than the Scotch, were remarkable for their
milkiness of dispo,ition.-21forning chronicle.

•fit NEW RULES

FOR THE
ASSIMILATION OF THE PRACTICE'

IN THE

COURTS OF COMMON LAW.

niLittAir T 44, , td WILLIAM IV.

Wful•_!as it Is expedient that the practice of ;the Courts of
King's Ilench, Common Pleas, and Exchequet Pgil, should,
as far as possible, be rendered tuilfOr4,

It is ordered, that the o±:iliee to be observed in the said
Courts, with reqrett to the matters hereinafter mentioned,
shall be ‘h.'s' 17.i1lows ; that is to say—

AUTHORITY TO PROSECUTE OR DEFEND.

Warrants of attorney to prosecute or defend shak! pOt i%e en-
tered on distinct rolls, but on the top Of tlYe iVVde
A special admission cf procketin .k.sy or guardian, to prose-
cute or defend for an infSnk, shall not be deemed an authority
to prosecute et &tend in any but the particular action or
actions Specified.