The Sun.
London, England, 1835-07-08 00:00:00

PARTNERSHIPS DISSOLVED,

W. Sowerby and R. L. Bernard, wine merchants, Houncisditch,
and S. Burnley, millers, Yorkshire—A. Black and Co., booksellers,
Tavistock-street—W. Watkins and Co., bankers, Northampton,
as far as regards W. Gillett —J. Homes and A. Lymburn, wine-
merchants, Liverpocl—W. Dick and W. Baker, surgeons, Bedford-
square— E. Stevenson and S. Rhodes, plumbers, Nottingham—J.
Orange and G Sumners, shoemakers, Liverpool—J. Farrow and J.
C:asby, tea-ds.alers, Durham—C. Bennetts and J. Bray, spirit
dealers, St. Austell, Cornwall—R. Clogg and E. Norris, cotton
spinners, Manchester—T. Flint and H. Greenwood, cloth mer-
chants, Leeds, Yorkshire—W. Ramsbottom and R. Pritchard, dyers,
Waterside, .Yorkshire—R. Nicholls and C. Fisk, confectioners,
San'hamptan—A. Q. .Henriqucs, and Co., merchants, London—
J. New4ham and R. Tooth, brewers, Kent—T. F. Staple and G.
Field,,&:ronn, Southwark—J. and J. Barnett, builders, Birrning-
ham---W. Dagger's and W. Winstanley, jun., attorneys, Liverpool—
Wells and T. Smith, Paddington...

SCOTCH SEQUESTRATION:
WM. HAIG, distiller, Seggie, Fifeshire, July 10 and 23, at two,
at 11I`Nab's inn, Cupar-Fife.

COURT OF THE SURROGATE OF.THE JUDICIAL
COMMITTEE of the PRIVY COUNCIL—SMITH w. SMITH.—
This was an application to the Court to admit the libel of
Eliza Ann Carmichael Smith, against her husband, William
Henry C. Smith. When the cause was last brought before
this Court the Surrogate then sitting had not thought it pro-
per to admit the libel without referring it to the judicial Com-
mittee ; that had been done, and it appeared to be the opinion
then that the Surrogate was perfectly competent to admit it,
and that it was thej.r wish that he should do so, as there was
no opposition, and no appearance had been made, and there
was nothing objectionable on the face of the allegation. Dr.
Haggard read the libel to the Court on the part of the wife.
It appeared that in 18.24 a separation and divorce had been
sued for on the ground of adultery, but that eventually a com-
promise was made, and the proceedings before the Court stop-
ped. Since then, however, the terms of that compromise had
not been fulfilled by the husband. The Court directed that
the libel should be admitted.

TIIE WEDDING DAY.—Yesterday three young
men, named Henry Banks, William Johnson, and William
Henry Bromley, were charged before Messrs Walker and
Tubbs, at the Lambeth-street Police-office, with being dis-
fi'n'etel°r(fekricnrig ttloiatprmelo,ernntintgh,e'man.d
IslsaeupltriiisTnetrhse
orderly in the streets between the hours of two and three
a
ibeence,- otno t
Ah es
ti r_
hpadol
ley's Theatre, and having got somewhat fresh after leaving
there, they on their way home were singi,f; loudly, ringing
bells, and knocking loudly at'different doors. The police ulti-
mately interfered with them, and a sharp tussle succeeded in
bringing them to the station-house,.when they were locked up.
On that (yesterday) morning the inspector on duty received a
communication from the Rev. Mr. Mathias, stating- that a
young woman was waiting at the church to be .m-Erried to
br.tatev,. one cr•the petsoner, and rrytestiug Tau Ile nngut
be sent to the church, as the banns had been regularly pub-
lished, and that morning appointed by the friends of both par-
ties for their union to tale place. The inspector (the charge
against the prisoner not being of a serious nature) readily
complied with the request of the Rev. Gentleman, and the
eetemony, to the ,great joy of the bride, who remained for
sometime in great suspense, lest the unfortunate circumstance
of her intended being locked up would prevent their marriage.
After the .ceremony the
.brideroom returned to durance, and
on being brought before the Magistrates was convicted in the
penalty of five shillings, which he paid, and joined his bride
and a number of friends who were waiting olltside the office,
and went with them to.enjoy the wedding day.

STATIi or EUROPE —To whichever side we turn
our eyes, a picture presents itself which is not that of peace.
The Peninsula and Italy have only to be named -to call up
idea's of convulsion, of struggling opinions, of opposing ill-
iluences, of insecurity and even war—the suspension of -hos-
tilies in Holland and Belgium, the independence of Sweden,
are contingent only on the union of the policy of the five
great powers. These powers are all in a state of opposition—
all having separate objects, distinct projects, alarms, and se-
crets. Prussia is making a peaceable conquest of all
the small states of Germany—France dismembering in the
South the Ottoman Empire, combining with Ruisia to over-
throw it, combining with England to support certain prin-
ciples in Spain—Austria, united in interests to England, is
united by principles to Russia. Austria is opposed to Prussia's
incorporations in Germany ; she agrees with her in Holland,
.Belgium,, and the Peninsula ; she agrees with England in
Germany and the East, but disagrees with her hi Holland,
Belgium, -and the Peninsula. 'Austria and Prussia seem to
unite against England and France, yet Austria and Prussia
are opposed in their most vital interests; and perhaps the action
of the policy of England and France is not less at variance,
whatever their principles or interests may be. Prussia, the
most democratic of powers in her administration, the most
despotic and legitimate in her policy, swallows up GermallY
by her apparent liberality, and throws into_ the scale of legiti-
macy nearly twenty millions (by nequi,,itian in 1815 and 1835)
of the most enlightened population of Europe, and our natural
and commercial allies. British and Foreign Review.