The Sun.
London, England, 1860-12-15 00:00:00

THE WAR IN CHINA.

We ( limes ) have been favoured with the fol-
lowing most important letter from head-quarters
CAMP BEFORE PEKIN, on the N.W. Side,
Oct. 9, 1860.
At the time of closing my letter, written from the
camp at Pa-li-chiao, on the 23d of last month, I was
induced, in consequence of the confident anticipa-
tions to that effect entertained by all those who
were aware of the nature of the communication
that had just been received from the newly ap-
pointed Im penal Commissioner, the Prince of Kung,
to express strong hopes that before the departure
of the present mail the whole of the party made
prisoners on the 18th ult, would be liberated and
have rejoined our camp. These anticipations, I re-
gret to say, have been only partly realised. Parkes,
Loch, the Count l'Escayrac de Lauture, a gentle-
man attached to the French army in some scientific
capacity, one of Probyn's Sikhs, and four French
soldiers, who, it now appears, were the only pri-
soners confined in Pekin itself, were brought into
the camp yesterday afternoon ; but the others, who
from the latest and most reliable Chinese account
given by Hang-ko to Parkes him self only two hours
ago, have been imprisoned in various district towns
in the neighbourhood of the capital, cannot by any
possibility make their appearance before the day
after to-morrow at the earliest, so that another
fortnight must elapse before their friends at home
can receive the assurance of their being once again
in perfect safety.

I should be glad were it in my power to give them
some comfort by stating that we had been able to
learn something about each of the prisoners indi-
vidually, but, from the fact of their having been
separated immediately after their capture, and all
communication between them or about them strictly
prohibited by the chief authorities, it has been
found impossible to trace any one of them, and
absolutely nothing is known respecting them but
what Hang-ke has told Wade and Parkes within
the last two days, to this effect—that with the
exception of th 6 'party confined in Pekin, who
were liberated yesterday, they were for some time
subsequent to the 18th of September kept in con-
finement in different camps situate betweeh Tung-
chau and Pekin. When it became evident, after
the second defeat of the. Tartar troops on the 21st,
that these were no longer to be relied on as places of
safe custody, they were removed, as stated above, to
several towns in the vicinity—the names of which
he (Hang-ke) declared himself to be ignorant of,
with the exception of one, Tang-ping-chau, about
200 li or 50 miles from Pekin. He stated most posi-
tively that he did not know either the names or the
exact number of the persons so confined, but he had
been told that flovpral of them were black, and not
of the same nation as the English and French; this,
of course, would apply to the Sikhs. I may add that
both Messrs. Wade and Parkes are of opinion that
Hang-ke really told them all ho know on the sub-
ject.
Having now made you acquainted with everything
that it has been possible to ascertain respecting
those who still remain in the hands of the Chinese,
I must, before giving in some detail an account of
what happened to Parkes and the others during the
time of their detention, let you have a summary of
the proceedings of the army, and of the communica-
tions that have passed between the Ambassadors
and the Chinese Government on the subject of the
prisoners from the 23d ultimo up to the present
time, in order that your readers may be enabled
to follow without much difficulty the somewhat
shifting course of events in this part of the world.
It may be as well to remind them that in my last
lettter I mentioned that two communications had
been received by Lord Elgin from the new Com-
missioner, Prince of Kung, and brothor of the Em-
peror; the first merely announcing his appoint-
ment, and expressing strong hopes that a pacific
solution of the existig difficulties might be arrived
at ; to which an answer was immediately sent, say'
ing that it was impossible for the ambassador to
think of treating so long as the British subjects
wrongfully made prisoners on the 18 th were de-
tained by the Chinese Government. The second, in
reply to this, acknowledged that there were certain
British subjects kept prisoners by his Government,
a fast which he had not thought it at all necessary
to allude to in his first letter, but maintaining that
they could not, on any account, be set at liberty
until after the convention had been signed and the
allied armies had been withdrawn from the country.
He did not, I believe, in this answer attempt to
justify their capture in the first instance, or subse-
quent detention, but in some of his later commu-
nications he has not hesitated to do so, on the
ground that they had been taken within the Chinese
lines after the action had commenced, and conse-
quen sly ought t 0 ni
rnot
uta
ent
dot bt
factoe
be
ei
tv
at
tan
twu
taphr
ea;s
people
longeho ignoring
and China
tthheusndoettuaniniZ:
all Chinese high officials, military as well
hadhhei
eghoofnt ehwei
hny
eowhTe urwen
agsb- epohuearnufdeieueantsntgtlohEydeeernnuyregthasiwlprdafieeeenalre: rag:,
tybceircumstances, more especially such assou under-
stood taoredur cbeay,n
as civil, and wval
those which led to the capture in question, which
even by his own admission could never have occurred
but for a battle which was certainly brought about
by their own treachery, and, more than this, begun
by themselves. To this second letter of the Prince
of Kung's there could be of coure but one answer
—that the prisoners must be given up, and that so
far from the army being withdrawn, it would, on
the contrary be pushed forward with all possible
rapidity, in which case the consequences could cot.
fail to be most serious for the capital in the event of
its being attacked, and possibly for the dynasty
itself in the event of its being captured and
destroyed. While feeling convinced that a reply
in this sense was the only one it was fitting t •
make, Lord Elgin was extremely desirous of put'
to
ting it in such a shape as would be most likely
lead to a speedy liberation of Parkes and the
others.
m eHh
te, t
juhought
hg ht itof
otpossiblehersby
that
its
othe n
sta h Chinesedar
d, Govern'
mig
not improbably imagine that if they gave up tn'
pr
two Ambassadorsisoners at once andm
beforeight peace
insisto was e c lsaornie
the
further demands besides those contained in the cow
ventions negotiated at 'Tien-tsin. With h
he the
res
oviiveol
of removing all suspicions of this natlVr
to leave it open to the Chinese
make the restoration of the prisoners
aaeht.ds ..tGovernment
heß sairgortit
ing of the Conveption simultaneous
theirGros fully
despatches concurred
w ere i nw
oLroedr\ed.
edntto otElgin's
fhitsheeoffpcethentii.no
en
s,Aebsoth it
was very desirable, in the
te-
fhuseipn
rgistoonceorns,cetdbeatthtehpe point as
etnotsthoef liberation
tarl
commanders
charaetto:l
andd b
some
omfet ea
yms oms tupromptmust
saele
for
cisiTe