The Sun.
London, England, 1856-07-15 00:00:00

MANCHESTER, JULY 14,

STOOK EXCHANGE. —The market has been doing a
quiet business to-day, but prices were rather higher.
Leeds, 98—Sbeffields, 61. Pret., p.—Eastern Counties,
IN—Chester anti Birkenhead, 17—London stock, 107i—
Lancashire Insurance, p.—Ashton and Oldham Canal,
146 x d.

LONDON, BRIGHTON, AND SOUTH COAST RAILWAY.—
The board of directors, after examining the accounts for
the past half-year, yesterday, decided upon recommend-
ing the payment of a dividend for- the half-year of
2/. 10s. per cent. on the consolidated stock of the
company.

A letter from Patras, in the Osservatore Triestino
states that the lonian merchants settled there have
signed a petition to the British Government to send a
vessel of war there for their protection.
[ADVERTISEMENT.] -- The most inveterate liver com-
plaint and diarrhoea, which had resisted all medicines
for years, yielded to Du Barry's delicious Revalenta
Arabica Food, which removes indigestion (dyspepsia),
flatulency, constipation, nervous, bilious, and liver com-
plaints, cough, asthma, consumption, and debility. Our old
friend the great Indian traveller, Major Edie, writes
as follows :—" London, • 20th March, 1852.—Dear Sir,
—Having suffered fearfully for two years from an enlargement
o" the liver and an inveterate diarrhoea, brought on in India
and China, and having tried the advice of the most eminent
professional men in China, India, and at home, without any
other result than gradual decay, I was on the brink of the
grave—unable to lift my arms from perfect exhaustion, when
Wraughton, of the Hon. E. I. C. Service, recommended
me to try Du Barry's excellet.t Revalenta Arabica Food, and
to discard the drugs I was then taking The result of eatin;
this delicious Foo 1 is the perfect restoration of my health
within a month; and I take a peculiar pleasure in ree om mending
all ,offerers to follow my example. I shall be happy to answer
any inquiries. I am, &c., W. Ewa, Major, H.M.S. , Unattached.
Supported by testimonials from the celebrated Professors of
Chemistry Dr. Andrew Ure ; Dr. Shorland ; Dr. Harvey ;
Dr. Campbell ; Dr. Gattiker ; Dr. Wurzer ; Dr. Ingram ;
Lord Stuart de Denies; the Dowager Countess of Castle-
et Major-Gen. Thomas King, Mid many other respectable
persons, whose health has been restored by it, after all other
means of cure had failed. Suitably packed for all climates,
with full instructions. In canisters, 51bs., lls. ; 121b5., 225. ;
super-refined, Ilb., 6s. ; 21bs., lls. ; 51bs., 225, ; 101bs., 335.
The 101bs. and 121bs. carriage free, on receipt of post-office
order. Bain du Barry and Co., 77, Regent-street, London
Fortnum, Mason' and Co., Purveyors to her Majesty, Picca-
dilly ; also at 60, Gracechurch-street ; 330 and 451, Strand ; 4,
Oheapside ; 68, Cornhill ; 49, Bishopsgate-street; 55, Char.
ing_cross; 54, Upper Baker-street; 63 and 157, Oxford.
&treat.

. _ .
and that there was a possibility of the work _
to be begun de novo. That report is now before us,
and it appears from its contents that the statements
then made were but too correct. In case the views
taken by these gentlemen are right, not only viill the
work already completed have to be taken tip, but
there will accrue a total loss on the works of about
42,0001. It will be in the recollection of the !public
that the subject of rebuilding Westminster-bridge occu-
pied the attention of a select committee of the douse
of Commons and of the house itself, and after ature
deliberation, it was determined to erect a bridge n the
old site, of a width of 85 feet, being double at of
1
the present bridge. The contract for this brid a was
taken by Mr. Mars for 206,4381., to which there'would
have to be added 17,7901. for extras, making 4 total
of 224,228/. This tender was much below any other.
However, the works were commenced, and 85,0001. ex-
pended on them, when Mr. Mare became bankrupt.
The Chief Commissioner of Works afterwards desired
Messrs. Bendel and Simpson to examine the plane and
the works executed, and to report to him on the follow-
ing points :-Ist. The cost of the works up to the
date of their report, or as near to that point as they
could ; 2d. The progress which had been made in the
works ; 3d. The time in which the first half of the
bridge would be ready for traffic ; 4th. The time neces-
sary for the completion of the whole stricture, and its
probable cost under existing circumstances, also the pro-
bable cost of its approaches ; sth. Their opinion as to
the original scheme, and the nature of that scheme,; and
6th, The desirability of proceeding with the building ;
and he desired, should their opinion be unfavourable to
the prosecution of the present plan; that they would set
forth most fully the reasons which induced them to arrive
at such a conclusion, and should also advise as to the
course to be adopted, taking into consideration all the cir-
cumstances of the case, and bearing in mind that the object
to be attained was to have a bridge of a permanent cha-
racter. These gentlemen report that 85,0001. have al-
ready been expended, and that, supposing the original
plan of the bridge to be followed out, it could not be
completed for less than 25 per cent, more than the
original contract. This would have been bad enough,
but they go on to state that the principle on which the
piers of the bridge were being constructed was faulty,
and that the bridge could not be regarded as a ' perma-
nent' structure even when completed. The original plan
was to dispense with coffer dams or caissons for founding
the piers and abutments. This was proposed to be done
by forming the piers, below low water, of a series of wo -den
and iron piles, surrounded by a sheathing of cast iron,
the space enclosed by this sheathing being filled in with
concrete. These piles, which are united together by strong
wrought iron ties, are then cut off at a uniform level of 6
inches above low-water mark, and upon them the ma-
sonry is laid. To this plan Messrs. Rendel and Simpson
offer their decided objection. They are of opinion, more-
over, considering the nature of the bed of the river at the
proposed site, that no piers would last except they were
built of solid masonry, sunk deep in the London clay ;
and that to accomplish this, it will be necessary to resort
to coffer dams. They also think that the saving of the
cost of a temporary bridge is not a sufficient compensa-
tion for the trouble, delay, risk, and even extra cost con-
sequent on the construction of the bridge in two sec-
tions, as was originally proposed, and in such close proxi-
mity
with the old bridge. The temporary bridge is esti-
mated to cost 35,0001. ; and the total amount to be ex-
pended, in addition to what has been already laid out, is
804,0001. ! Such are their views, supposing that the
bridge is to be constructed at its present width ; but they
propose, in lieu of this, that the width of the bridge
should be reduced to 60 feet, which is still six feet six
inches wider than London-bridge—that, on account of
the rapidly increasing traffic, another bridge be erected
over the river between Lambeth Church and the Horse-
ferry-road—and that approaches shotild be constructe I
which would open Belgravia and the west end of Lon-
don to the Surrey side of the river, and so materially
draw away a large portion of the present traffic from
Westminster-bridge. By erecting a permanent bridge
in this locality, the necessity of constructing a tem-
porary bridge during the building of the one at West-
minster would be avoided. By restricting the width of
the bridge to 60 feet, 57,0001 would also be saved ; a
large sum would also be gained in the expenditare for
the approaches, which being deducted from the estima-
ted cost of Lambeth-bridge (415,000/.), would leave
210,0001. as the ultimate cost. The total outlay, how-
ever, requ;red for the two bridges, including approaches
on both sides of the river, making roads, &e., would be
898,0001., or perhaps more nearly 1,000,000/. The
bridge at Lambeth would he completed first in four
years, and the one at Westminster in five years
afterwards. Such are the leading features of
the report which is now under the consideration
of a select committee of the House of Com-
mons. If Messrs. Rendel and Simpson's
views as to the principle upon which the piers of the
new bridge are being constructed be correet—and they
have stated before the committee that they could not,
on their reputation as engineers, recommend the bridge
to be completed on the original plan—the unuecessary
expenditure of this large sum of money will create very
general dissatisfaction. Amongst the engineering world
the report will create intense interest and discussion, as
there exists a strong party who believe in the solidity
of the new princip'e, whilst others are diametrically op-
posed to it. The public, however, will not hesitate to
condemn what they will probably. terra a wasteful ex-
penditure of their money, and will also deprecate the
inconvenience arising from the delay in completing the
bridge. Nevertheless, it is fortunate that the error, if
error it be, is discovered even now, for it would have
been disastrous in the extreme; if the bridge, when com-
pleted, had to be taken down. '

GREENWICH FAIR.—The Kentish, Mercury says that
the ranger of Greenwich park has just forbidden the
veteran tars to occupy their usual stands upon Observa-
tory•hill, with telescopes and spyglasses.