The Sun.
London, England, 1860-03-24 00:00:00

LAW INTELLIGENCE.—(This Day.)

COURT OF CHANCERY.
(Before the Lord Chancellor and Lords Justices.)

EARL OF TYRONE V. THE MARQUIS OF WATERFORD.

At the conclusion of the arguments of counsel, the Lord
Chancellor said judgment would be delivered this day four
weeks.

ROLLS COURT.
(Before the Master of the Rolls.)
STAINTON V. THE CXRILON COMPANY.

His Honour the Master of the Rolls was of opinion that
the compromise entered into by the parties in this snit did
not prevent the Carron Company from taking accounts
against the late Mr. Henry Stainton, their manager in
London, from the commencement of his employment in
1808, to his death, and not from June 30, 1825, as ordered
under the decree of this court. His Honour, after refereing
to the facts of the case, made an order to this effect.
That notwithstanding any compromise, decrees or orders
of Court in this suit, the Carron Company shall be at liberty
to surcharge or falsify any accounts of Mr. H. Stainton, as
their manager, from the time he entered into their employ-
ment to the time of his death. That due notice shall be
given of particular items to be vouched, and order £229,000
to be paid into this Court (Zl5O received under the compro-
mise, and also that both parties shall concur in suc'a acts
as may be necessary to obtain the transfer of £59,000 in the
Royal Bank of Scotland to the credit of this cause in. this
Court). Grant an injunction to restrain proceedings in the
action between the parties (in the Court of Session, Scotland).
Accounts to be taken before his Honour at chambers, a dis-
tinction being made as to periodical vouchers between the
first and subsequent periods of twenty years to the final
close of the accounts, with liberty to aprly. After making
a few observations on the claims of the defendants under
tbo former decree, his Honour granted liberty to loth
parties to appeal to a higher tribunal against this decree
on the express understanding that no objections would be
made to the decree on the ground that it was obtained
under this motion.

• CIIILD V. MILD.
His Honour said—l am of opinion I cannot give the
plaintiff costs of the affidavits, only costs in the cause.

POLICE INTELLIGENCE.—(This Day„)

MARLBOROUGH-STREET.

WHOLESALE ROBBERY OF BOOTS AND SHOES )317 A
SnormAN.—Thomas Wyburn, shopman to Mr. John
Butler, boot and shoemaker, of 100, Tottenham-court-road,
was charged before Mr. Bingham with plundering his
master to a large amount of boots and shoes, a consideralle
quantity of which were produced in court by Lambert, 6S E.

Lambert, 68 E, said in consequence of information he
received he went to Mr. Butler's, 100, Tottenham-cotert-
road, at seven the previous evening. He saw the prisoner
and told him he was a police officer, that he had received
information that he had been robbing his master for a bong
time, and that he had a great deal of property at his lodg-
ings, which he denied. He then told him that he should
go and see, and the prisoner then said, " I've two or thre e
pairs there belonging to my master." He asked the prs-
- if he lived at 16, Warren-street, and he replied that la e
did, and, on his proceeding there, accompanied by Mir.
Butler, he found in the prisoner's room 22 pairs of women:'s
boots, 24 pairs of children's boots, 9 pairs of shoes, 4 pains
of goloshes, and about 601bs. of leather. (A sample of th e
property was produced.)

Mr. John Butler, boot and shoemaker, of 100, Totten -
ham-court-road, said the prisoner had been in his employ,
as shopman, six or seven years or more, in one of his shop:.
He had been missing property of late. He accon-ipanie d
on the previous night the officer to 16, Warren-street, the
prisoner's lodging, and saw the officer find property, which
he was able to identify, to the amount of £4O at least.
Mr. Bingham, after the usual caution, asked the prisoner
whether he wished to say anything ; aad, on his reply-
ing in the negative, he was committed for trial.