The Sun.
London, England, 1856-10-23 00:00:00

NAPLES.

The Universal Gazette of Leipsic states that in
addition to the letter of the Czar to the King of
Naples, recommending him to yield to the wishes
of the Western Powers, Baron Kisseleff, the Rus-
sian Ambassador at Rome, has been charged to
call the attention of the Neapolitan Government
to the consequences of persisting in its present
•nurse of condact.

The Paris correspondent of the Emancipation
of Brussels says :—" It is not by any means
certain that Baron Brenier is to leave Naples
immediately for France. I have reason to be-
lieve that the French Minister at Naples, in
informing King Ferdinand of the resolutions of
the French Government, and in announcing the
necessity in which he is placed, in consequence of
the orders transmitted to him, to leave his post,
has accorded some days' reflection to the Neapoli-
tan Government. That is the course generally,
pursued on such occasions ; as a minister accre-
dited to a foreign court does not break off all
intercourse abruptly, unless very exceptional cir-
cumstances, such as do not exist in this case, as
far as I can learn, should have arisen. Besides,
we have already had such proofs of patience and
good feeling that it is not probable that the Wes-
tern Powers would approve of any precipitation.
It is not therefore too much to say that not only
Baron Brenier has not yet left Naples, but that
he has allowed King Ferdinand time to reflect on
the consequences of such a departure." On the
other hand, the following letter from Tienna, in
the Cologne Gazette, seems to imply that nothing
will induce the King to give way. It says :
"King Ferdinand said to General Martini, the
Austrian ambassador, at the audience which that
diplomatist had of his Majesty, that be did not
recognise the competency of the Congress of Paris
in the Neapolitan question, and that he opposed
on principle the introduction of this question into
the deliberations of the Congress. This declara-
tion is authentic. The policy followed by the
King of Naples causes much annoyance to our
Cabinet. Austria has succeeded in obtaining from
France that the Neapolitan question should be
solved by the Congress, and has not despaired of
converting England to that idea. The consent of
the King of Naples was never doubted, and now
lie not only refuses to yield, but goes further,
and refuses to refer the matter to the Congress.'

Lastly, a letter from Naples of the 10th, in the
Austrian Gazette, says :—" On hearing that
France and England had recalled their ambas-
sadors, the Council of Ministers assembled, it
is affirmed that the Ring expressed his regret
at the decision come to by the Western Powers,
but that for his part he could not, and would
not, give way. Nevertheless, in order to ex-
press the consideration of the King for the Em-
peror Napoleon and Queen Victoria, and to
prevent the supposition that he desired a diplo-
matic rupture with the Western Powers, it was
decided in the Council of Ministers that the
Neapolitan ambassadors at Paris and London
should not be recalled. On the contrary, an order
was sent to them to keep up continued diplomatic
relations with those Governments, and not to
quit their posts, unless their passports were sent
to them."

A Paris letter, in the Independance of Brussels,
says :—" In the event of a vessel of war being
sent to Naples to fetch away M. Brother (but
which is not yet decided on), the Duchayla is
mentioned as being intended for that service.
The Bavarian Minister, it is said, will be charged
with the protection of the French and English
residents after the departure of their respective
legations. No one, on the part of France, will
remain at Naples but M. Soulange•Bodin, the
Consul."