The Sun.
London, England, 1860-05-31 00:00:00

12.11.10.
i 16 I

2.14.5
7.4.0

13s 6d
2.4

RACING FIXT

Ascot 5
Hampton l3
Newton l3
Odiham l9
Beverley 2O

Newmarket J. 3
Carlisle
Worcester 5

Liverpool
Abingdon . 12

Auo

Brighton
Brighton Club 3
Wolverhampton
Reading 8
Radcliffe l3
Egham l4

SEPT:,

Warwick
Doncaster 11
Chesterfield l7
Leiseater l9

OCTI

lOxford l6
Plymouth _
York 22
ILichfield 27
Stockton 2B
Derby 29
:MEER.

Monmouth
Manchester Autumn 21
Newmarket F.O. .. 26

,BI It.

Bedford 3
Newmarket S 0

Newmarket II 22
Worcester Autumn.. 30

Nova]

:MIME.

Hereford
Liverpool Autumn 7
IRE]

Shrewsbury Autumn .. . .13

,AND.
NE.
I Curragh 26

Wicklow

LAW INTELLIGENOE.--(THIS DAY.)

DIVORCE COURT.
Before Sir C. Cresswell, Mr. Justice Willes, and Mr. Jus•

tice Hill.)

KITCHEN V. KITCHEN AND HALL.

This was a suit instituted by George Bradford Kitchen
for a dissolution of marriage on the ground of his wife's
adultery with the co-respondent. The hearing of the case,
which commenced at the last sitting of the full court, was
resumed this morning. _ _ _

It appeared that the parties, who are in humble life, re-
sided at Boston, Lincolnshire, and were married in 1850.
They continued to cohabit until 1853, when the adultery
pleaded was discovered by the husband.
The case, which was undefended, stood over for the pro-
duction of ad•litional witnesses.

Emma Kitchen was examined, and stated that she was
the sister of the petitioner, and visited him and his wife at
Boston, in 1850. She remained about a week, and during
that time Mrs. Kitchen took her with her to the Railway
Tavern in the town, which was frequented by men em-
ployed on the railway, and women of bad character. Mrs.
Kitchen's conduct while at this place was most unbecom-
ing, and she was in the habit of using very bad language
to the persons in the house. She desired her not to tell the
petitioner of her visiting the house, as it would make him
angry. She called on them again in 1852 and 1853, and
found her sister-in-law with a pair of blank eyes, and her
dress very disordered. She was frequently drunk, and the
petitioner knew nothing of her conduct. He was in the
habit of going out to work, and remaining away for some
days; and though he occasionally scolded his wife, his
general treatment of her was very kind. From a letter
which she received in 1863 she afterwards went to Peter-
borough, where her brother and his wife were then living.
She saw the latter, who was drunk and dirty, aad who
said that she acted in such a manner that her husband
would never forgive her. They then separated, and had
not since cohabited.

The Court considered this evidence sufficient, and de-
creed the dissolution of the marriage.

POLICE INTELLIGENCE--(THIS DAY.)

MARLBOROUGH-STREET.,

AN INCORRIGIBLE YOUNG THIEF.--Thomas Smith, a
boy who has been in custody about 50 times, the last for
stealing a jacket in Regent-street, when he was committed
for three months, was brought before Mr. Beadon, charged
with stealing some silver from the till of Mr. Portsmouth,
eating-house keeper, of 15, Charles-street, Middlesex
Hospital.
It appeared that Mrs. Portsmouth heard a noise in the
shop, and on going behind the counter found the prisoner
there kneeling down with the till open and his hand in it,
and on a customer being called by her to assist the money
was taken from the prisoner's hand, and a constable being
called he was given into custody.
Sergeant Cole, 23 C, having proved a conviction against
the prisoner, who made no defence, he was committed for
trial.

ATTEMPTING TO PICK POCKETS AT THE ALHAMBRA
PALACE.—Three young men, named Bunington, Hamilton,
and Middleton, were charged by Gordon, 336 A, and Ser-
geant Joy, 9 C, with attempting to pick pockets at the
entrance of the Alhambra Palace the previous evening,
there being a large crowd assembled in consequence of
Sayers and Heenan being present.
Mr. Edward Lewis, of Great Marlborough-street, ap-
peared for the prisoners.
Mr. Beadon said the officers had acted very properly in
taking the prisoners into custody, as they had thereby pre-
vented a felony, but the evidence not being sufficiently
strong he should discharge the prisoners.

THIS DAY'S MARKETS.