The Sun.
London, England, 1856-10-25 00:00:00

THE MAIN DRAINAGE SCHEME.

A resolution passed at last meeting was then read.
It was to the effect that the plan agreed to for the main
drainage scheme be considered, and the best means for
laying it before the Government be adopted.
Mr. Deputy HARRISON said that he was present on
the occasion when a former deputation waited on the
Government, and he then saw that the chairman and
engineer were the persons chiefly consulted. On the
present oclasiln he should move that this board, when
it submits to the Government the scheme it has adopted
for tae main drainage of the metropolis, be represented
by the chairman, engineer, and clerk.
- Mr. CARPMAEL seconded the resolution.
Mr. LESLIE protested against the whole proceedings.
He maintained that the decision arrived at was illegal,
inasmuch as it was agreed to by a board not specially
convened for the purpose.
The CHAIRMAN said the clurt was specially convened
for the consid,ration of certain matters, the main drain-
age amongst them.
Mr. LESLIE having staled several other objections,
handed in a protest against the deei,ion, and said he
should feel it his duty to accompany the chairman when
he waited on Sir B. Hall, in his capacity as a member
for Belgravia, and strongly urge upon the hon. baro-
net his reason for objecting to having a permanent
pumping station in the parish of St. George's II:m-
-over-square, whereby the sewage from Hammer-
smith, Kensington, and other places, would he col-
lected in that vicinity, and create there an insufferable
nuisance.

Mr. HAWKES wished that the decision arrived at
the last meeting of the board should be recon-
sidered and rescinded.

A short discussion here took place, in which some
speakers were in favour of a deputation of the six mem-
bers who had previously waited on the Government
taking the scheme up.
Mr. TAYLOR said he thought the proper course to
adopt was to place the official seal of the board on the
plans, and send it in the ordinary way documents are
forwarded to the Government. He did not see any
occasion why the chairman or engineer should be sent
with the scheme.
Mr. NIOIIOLAY moved an amendment—!' That the
plan be sent to the Government with the official seal of
the hoard upon it."
Mr. LESLIE said he should vote for the scheme being
sent to the Government with the seal upon it. lie
hoped it would be sent as soon as possible, for he was
certain they woul,l have it returned to them, and the
whole subject would have to be reconsidered. (Laughter
and hear, bear.)
Mr. TENNIS said he thought the best plan was to send
it in a F.,rown paper parcel by the Parcels Delivery
Company. (Laughter, and hear.) He thought at all
events it ought to be sent up without any deputation, as
it could not be defended for an instant.
Mr. Dsputy HARRISON said it would be a disrespect
to the chairman, if they sent the scheme with merely
the seal of the board upon it. (No, no.)
The Clerk then road the motion that the plan be sub-
mitted to the Government by the chairman, engineer,
and clerk.

A. division was then taken on the question that the
official seal be placed on the scheme, and it be trans-
mitted to the Government without a deputation. The
motion was negatived.
A. division then took place upon the original motion
that the chairman, engineer, and clerk convey the
scheme to the Government, when there appeared—
For the motion lB
Against it
Majority

. --10

The motion was then agreed to.
After the trmsaction of some routine business the
board adjourned.

THE CASE OF ARCHDEACON DENISON.

The following is a correct copy of the paper put in by
the defendant, Oct. 22, 1856, prior to the delivery of the
sentence :-
1. In respect of the receiving of the body and blood of
Christ by the wicked—
I find in Article XXV. the words following :
" They that receive them (the sacraments) unworthily
purchase to themselves damnation, as St. Paul saitb."

I find in the Catechism—
That a sacrament hag two parts, the outward and the
in ward. That the inward part, or thing signified, of the
sacrament of the Lord's Supper is the body and blood of
Christ.
I am therefore unable to deny that the inward part,
or thing signified, of the sacrament, the body and blood
of Christ, are received by the wicke d to their damnation ;
and I disclaim the receiving of theta in any other sense.
11. In respect of the worship du 9^
In the notice appended to the firut Book of Homilies,
and referred to, as of authority, in the title-page of the
second Book, there are the words following :
"Of the due receiving of His blessed body and blood,
under the form of bread and wine."

aiy proposition is,
" ft is true that worship is due to the real, though in-
visible and supernatural, presence of the body and blood
of Christ in the Holy Eucharist Under the form of
bread and wine.'"
I have, in the only two places in which I have spoken
of the worship due, expressly denied that worship is due
to the consecrated elements.
I am unable to deny that Christ, Himself the thing
signified of the sacrament, is to be worshipped in and
with the sacrament. I say that, apart from and with-
out the sacrament, wheresoever lie is, He is to be wor-
shipped.
I disclaim a,ry other worship.
GEORGE', ANTHONY DENISON,
Archdeacon of Taunton.
Bath, October 23, 1856.

CRYSTAL PALACE.—One shilling Day.--Fri-lay,
—Admissions on payment, 1,647 ; ditto by season
tickets, 369. Total visitors, 2,01 G.
THE VICE-CHANCELLORSHIP OF CAMBRIDGE UNI-
VEBSITY.--It is now understood that the Vice-Char.cel-
lorship for the academical year 1856-7 will, be filled by
tho Roy. Dr. Philpott, Motor of Bt. CAtharineo