The Sun.
London, England, 1860-06-14 00:00:00

I called on Mr. Billings with Miss Smith and Mrs.
Burroughs.
Mr. Macaulav—What did you tell him?
Mr. James—l object to this.
Examination coatinued—l recommended a soli-
citor to Mrs. Burroughs. I did not know what
proceedings were taken in the Divorce Court. I
never got any information from Prior as to what
he had seen. I heard it from Mr. Webb, the soli-
citor. I wrote this letter which is the libel to Mr.
Britton, I wrote it because it was circulated in the
neighbourhood. that I had eloped with Mrs. Bur-
roughs, and wished as far as I could to contradict
the statements made against myself. I wrote the
letter as a private communication. I think it pro-
bable that when Prior was in Mr. Burroughs's ser-
vice, I promised to get him a place. I had nothing
to do with getting him a place at Mr. Holmes's, but
I had at Devonport's. I never asked Prior ques-
tions as to what he could prove.
Cross-examined—l met Mrs.. Burroughs and her
aunt at the Pimlico station, because I had received
letters from Miss Sthith and Mr. Holmes. I said to
many persons at Horsham, that Mr. Burroughs had
intrigued with Mrs. Baines. I will not deny or
affirm that I said that he had intrigued with her.
I narrated the stories I had heard. I had met Mr.
Britton twice at the railway station at Brighton,
and dined with him twice at Mr. Burroughs's.
By the Court—l said to Mrs. Baines's brother
that it was unfortunate Mr, Burroughs was so
smitten with her, but I could not believe all the
stories about her. I cannot swear that I did not
say she was the most virtuous woman we had about
or that I did.

Mr. James—Have you not read the petition
which Mrs. Borroughs has presented to the Divorce
Court ?

Witness—l have never read it through.
Mr. James—Do you not know she charged her
husband of adultery with Mrs. Baines ?
Witness—l did.
A Juror—Was it at the time you were circulating
these reports that you saw Mr. Brown ?
Witness—lt was.
This closed the case for the defence, and Mr.
Macaulay then addressed the jury on the question
of damages.
Mr. James then replied on the whole case. .
Mr. Baron Wilde having summed up,
The jury retired for about a quarter of an hour,
and returned into court with a verdict for the plain-
tiff—damages, £350.
[We have been requested by Mr. Charles Lloyd,
upholsterer, of Horsham, to state that he is not the
person of the same name alluded to in the course of
this trial.]

POLICE INTELLIGENCE.—June 13.

BOW-STREET.—Robert rage, the conductor of
a Brixton omnibus (No. 2,144), was summoned for
loitering on his journey, and for costs; under the
following circumstances :
The complainant, Mr. F. Walker, watchmaker,
of 23, Acre-lane, deposed that he got into defend-
ant's omnibus at the Green Man and Still, Oxford-
street, at half-past 11 o'clock on the sth inst., in-
tending to return to his residence at Brixton. It
was the last omnibus on the road. On arriving at
Charing-cross the driver pulled up and remained
there ten minutes. Witness knew the conductor,
and requested him to go on. He replied, "If you
are in a hurry I am not," Witness repeated his
request, adding that if he did not proceed at once
on the journey he (complainant) would get out and
take a cab, charging him (conductor) with the ex-
pense. Defendant said if he liked to take a cab he
might do so, but he Gould have to pay for it him-
self; his time of leaving Charing-cross was a quarter
to twelve, and he should not go before. Witness
told the defendant it was already past that
time (it bring only thirteen minutes to twelve),
but he still remained, upon which witness and his
sister got out of the omnibus, hailed a cab, and so
completed the remainder of the journey, resolved
to try the question as to whether the expense could
not be recovered from the defendant by application
to a police-court. He had brought his sister to the
court to-day, in another cab, to give evidence if
necessary in support of the charge.
The defendant said it was usual to stop at Char-
ing-cross ten minutes, and he had not been there
more than five minutes when the complainant got
out and took the cab, In support of this defence
the conductor called another passenger.
Mr. John Wright, of 13, Trinity-square, Brix-
ton, stated that the omnibus had not been detained
at Charing-oross more than five minutes when the
.complainant interfered.

Mr. Jardine said the defendant had no right to
stop at Charing-cross even for a minute. The
police were directed to prevent omnibuses from
loitering on the road, but they could not be expected
to be always at hand. He (Mr. Jardine) was glad
the public were taking up the subject for them-
selves, as the magistrates had the power to inflict
a penalty of 10s. and costs in each case. He should
fine the present defendant 55., and the expenses in-
curred by complainant in taking a cab home, and
also for his cab in attending the court—making
6z. 3d.
The fine and costs were paid.

LAMBETH.—Mrs. Eliza Harriet Mary Fel-
tham, the lady who had been examined at this
court on Monday last, on a charge of stealing an
embroidered toilet and a pair of mittens, from the
stall of Lady Emily Peel, at the Bazaar or " Fancy
Fair," at the Crystal Palace, on Saturday last, sur-
rendered to her bail.
Mr. Wontner, on behalf of the charity for the
benefit of which the "Fancy Fair" was holden, at-
tended to prosecute, and Mr. James Lewis appeared
for the prisoner.
Lady Emily Peel was examined by Mr. Wontner
—Her ladyship said that on Saturday last she had
charge of a stall at a Bazaar or "Fancy Fair" held
in the Crystal Palace, for the benefit of the schools
belonging to the Clerks and Warehousemen's
Society. The embroidered washhand stand doyley
produced was part of the things on her stall which
had been for sale, and she had not missed it, or the
gloves or mittens, when they had been brought to
her by Bell, the officer.
Mr. Elliott—Can your ladyship say when they
were on the stall, or when you last saw them ?
' Lady Emily—l observed the doyley in the fore-
noon. The doyley was pinned to the stall and
hung down, and the gloves, though I don't wish to
swear to them, were on the stall.
Mr. Elliott—You had such gloves, or mittens, on
your stall?
Lady Peel—Oh, yes; but yet I do not like to
swear to them,

Mr. Elliott—The articles on the stall were your
own?

Lady Peel—Yes, they were all supplied by me.
Mr. Elliott—Do you recollect the price of the
doyley ?
Lady Peel—l cannot at this moment recollect.
Mr. Elliott—l understand it was labelled 10s. ?
Lady Peel—Well, that was the price at which
it should be sold.
In cross-examination by Mr. Lewis, Lady Peel
admitted that there was a considerable crowd
throughout the day about her, and that there was
a possibility of the article getting pushed off by
the pressure of the people. Her ladyship added
that she thought it had been in danger of dropping
off, and she recollected turning it up on the stall ;
but the pin by which it was formerly held•still
held it attached to the stall.
Mr. Elliott observed that, however respectable
the party, it was his duty to see justice carried out,
and he must therefore send the case before a jury,
The prisoner was then committed for trial to the
Surrey Sessions, but was admitted to bail in two
sureties of £5OO each.

[ADVERTISEMENT.]—HoIIoway's Pills and Ointment.—
Cherish hope. Let no sufferer despair of cure till a fair
trial has been given to these incomparable medicaments.
Marvellous cures are constantly reported of invalids being
restored to health when all hope had long since vanished.
All complaints of the chest, all irregularities of the heart,
impurities of the blood, all derangements of the stomach
and liver are banished by Holloway's
preparations. The
Ointment must be well rubbed over the parts affected twice
a-day at least, and oftener in urgent cases. The use of this
Ointment, aided by Holloway's Pills, will cure all sores,
ulcers, piles, fistulas, and skin diseases. However old, or
obstinate to their power, all eventually yield.

CRESSIVELL.—On theß 13IRTHS.
th inst., at Twickenham, the wife
of C. N. Cresswell, Esq., of a son.
CAPEL.---On the 12th inst., at 25, Princes•square, Bays-
water, the wife of Arthur Capel, Esq., of a daughter.
WYLLIE.—On the 7th inst., at Ellerslie, near Barnstaple,
the wife of Lieut.-Col. R. Wyllie, of a son.

MARRIAGES.
EDMONDS—COOKE —On the 12th inst., at Chiswick
Church, Mr. T. J. Edmonds, of Hounslow., to Maria,
daughter of the late T. M. Cooke, Esq., of Chiswick.
ATELTITTISH—WALTER.—On the 12th inst., at St. John's,
Margate, Mr. F. W. Melhuish, of Gilbert-street, Gros-
venor-square, to Maria Ann, eldest daughter of Mr. C.
D. Walter, of Margate, and of Bell-yard, Temple-bar,
London.

DEATHS.
BRAND.—On the 12th inst., at Bedford-hill House, Bal-
ham, Surrey, James Brand, Esq., aged 64.
ELLlsorr.—On the 13th inst., at Whitehall Gardens, Cuth-
bert Ellison, Esq., of Milburn Hall, in the county of
Durham, aged 77.
GREY.—On the 12th inst., at Roebuck Hall, near Dublin
Charles S. Grey, Esq., aged 50.

LONDON : Printed and Published by MURDO YOUNG-,
of No. 112, Strand, Printer, at The Sun Office, No. 112,
Strand, in the Precinct of the Savoy, in the county of
Middlesex, Thursday, Ante 14, 1860.