The Sun.
London, England, 1856-12-11 00:00:00

The Third Edition. Just Published, price 53., by post, free, 53. 6d,
ON TRUE it FALSE SPERMATORI(RA,
with the View of distinguishing the Imaginary from the
.teal Sufferers under this disease, and Correcting of wide-spread
Errors in relation to their Treatment and Cure.
Translated from cue German of Dr. PIC,KFORD.
"Dr. Eielford hs known to English readers by his frequent pract-
,:al contribution. to German medical literature. This is the first
time, he informs as, that he has addressed himself to the non-medi-
tal reader. We trust this may not be the last, if he .hall .ietect any
other equally flagrant evil which it may be in his power to cor-
rect."—London Medical Gazette. " The tribeof 'Quiet Sympathisers,'
and ' Medical Friends,' are mcrellessly exposed; and if this hook
zonld and its way into the hands of those wits saffer from the com-
plaint of which it treats, we are sattsiled that many hundreds would
be saved much needless suffering 01 body and mind, and what is of
cars importan,:e, thou.th it is that which the quacks most prize—
much money...... This volume is well qualified to put an end to the
empirical system of treating i../permatorrhcea, and to place the treat-
ment n; on a more rational and physiological basis. It is, therefore,
likely to do mace good."—Medical Circuler.

London: 11. Isalrore, ziti, Regent-street

ENGLISHMEN! Will you ' have " Fair
Play," and give your aid to put down an
unscrupulous monopoly; determined, if possible, "fas aut
nefas," to crush a company that will give the Public what
they require, viz. :—" Better Omnibus accommodation and
a wholesome Competition?"

. _
If each Omnibus rider would take, say only two or three
shares, they would have the management of the Omnibuses
under their own control, and not be the subjects of that
Despotic rower which says, " When we have all the Omni-
buses in our own hands, we will carry out what we have pro-
miscd."—Macnamara and Co. at the Mansion-house. Which,
translated, means, " We will reduce the number of Omni-
buses and increase the fares."

If the Parisian Omnibus Companies pay their Shareholders
124 per cent. and 20,0001. a•year to the Government for the
monopoly they enjoy, it will answer the purpose of the L. G.
0. C. to expend any amount of money and use every means
to crush competition and create a similar monopoly in this
metropolis —WILL YOU PERMIT rr
" Who would be free, himself must strike the blow."

NIETROPOLITAN SALOON OMNIBUS
COMPANY.

" Limited." Shares It each. Deposit ts.
Offices-158, Leadenhall-street, City.
The Directors of this Company have much pleasure in in-
forming the Shareholders and the Public, that " Patent
Saloon Omnibuses- are being built; and will be placed on
those lines of road first where Shareholders require Omnibus
accommodation.

Prospectuses and Forms of Application for Shares, and a
full refutation of the calumnies published against this Com-
pany, can be obtained at the Offices, and. Shareholders are
invited to make any inquiry they desire. Office hours, Ten
to Five.

W. R. POPE, Secretary.

THE COMING CONFERENCES.

lc Nord has an article explaining the defeat
which Russian diplomacy has sustained in the
Bolgrad dispute :

"In the beginning of the difficulty, France,
which was impartial, leaned to the Russian inter-
pretation ; but for the purpose of conciliation
sought for a compromise in combination which ap-
peared to her ought to satisfy all these angry
rivals. Sardinia used the same language as France.
Prussia never admitted the interpretation of Aus-
tria and England, which she even severely con-
demned. Opinions, therefore, were thus divided;
on the one side Turkey, sustained with violence
and the must absolute tone by Austria and Eng-
land, and on the other side Russia, supported with
firmness by Prussia, and with more reserve by
France and Sardinia. .

proposed to
apreprietailesbt
eadckittos the
it
Congressus "Russia
itself, then
anal formally
re-
assembly. The proposition was equally agreeableastened
to France, Austria, England, and Turkey h
to decline the offer of Russia ; Turkey, in guarded
and equivocal language; Austria, by wrapping its
refusal in honeyed forms ; and England, with dis-
dainful and insolent arrogance. The attitude of
England covered the weakness of Turkey and the
hypocrisy of Austria. England placed herself at
the head of the resistance, and, at the same time,
addressed severe reprimands to the Cabinet of
Berlin and ;he Cabinet of Turin. The latter, how-
ever, could not do much. We have already men-
tioned the tone of these representations of tingland,
couched in a style humiliating, and filled with
menace for the two Courts. Prussia was firm ; and
England, by way of punishing her, has taken upon
herself to support Switzerland in the Neuchatel
question. Everything, therefore, depended upon
France and Sardinia. Under these circumstances,
the question is insoluble. The following is the
mode of extrication that has been adopted, the
honour of which is due to the Cabinet of the
Tuileries :

" That Cabinet explained itself frankly at the
Court of St. Petersburg, and the consequence of
those explanations was, that Russia was far more
concerned in the point of honour than in a material
or political interest. The Cabinet of the Tuileries,
interpreting this language and attitude of Russia,
perceived that a decision of the majority of the
plenipotentiaries would relieve the Russian Go-
vernment of its embarrassment ; and that, while it
would only occasion to Russia an unimportant
sacrifice, and the necessity of an honourable re-
treat, it would entail upon Austria and upon En
land the obligation of withdrawing the armieswhich occupy the Principalities, and the fleets
which occupy the Black Sea. In this point of view,
the French Cabinet, in lending itself to the forma-
tion of a majority against Russia, remained faith-
ful to its policy, because, without doing any essen-
tial damage to Russia, it put an end to causes which
might threaten the peace of Europe.
" But how to form beforehand that majority de-
manded byEngland as the conditions without which
neither she, nor Austria, nor Turkey, would con-
sent to take part in the new Conferences ? If I
am well informed, this has been the subject of
an understanding between the Cabinets of Paris
and Turin. A little negotiation has taken place
between these Cabinets. Its object was to deter-
mine the Cabinet of Turin to follow that of the
Tuileries, to hold the same language as that of the
Tuileries in the future Conference, and to maintain
the same attitude. The Cabinet of,Turin yielded.
" Tho3e, then, who persuade themselves that the
Plenipotentiaries of the Seven Powers will assist at
the Conference, with liberty of judgment and inde-
pendence of mind, to pronounce judicially on the
in.erpretation of one or two Articles of the Treaty
of Paris,
indulge in strange illusions. Ten points,
which have been the subject of debate, are now de-
cided, and decided against Russia by a majority of
five votes to two. Russia knows it, and rightly
persists in her design of bringing the question be-
fore the Conference, and of accepting the resolu-
tions which shall be adopted by the majority of the
Plenipotentiaries. On some future day Russia
will have her turn ; to-day it is England's. In its
last stages the discussion presented for decision a
queAioLL of form and a question or substance. Eng-
land obtains the substance and willingly al3andons
the form—that is what she often does, and she finds
it answer well."