The Sun.
London, England, 1869-07-15 00:00:00

THE SUN, LONDON, THURSDAY EVENING, JULY 15, 1869

JOINT-STOCK BANKS.

--
at:ming -lisfellbsi
Share; NAME. Paid. Price. done
10 Agra Limited, A all 101 114 111 1
10 Do B lO 31 34 4 i
50 Albion
00 Alliance, Limited
20 Anglo Austrian
20 Anglo-Egyptian, lira all 204 214
20 Anglo-Huugarian
20 Anglo-Italian 186 G, limited 10 51 44
40 Australasian
20 Bank of British Columbia all 10 12 101
20 Do issued at 2 pm....., 5 5 4
25 Bank of Egypt
20 Bank of Otago, lint.
25 Bank of South Australia all 30 32
50 Bank of Victoria, Australia 25 37 39
10 Bank of New Zealand all 16 17
50 British North American
20 Chartered of India, Austra-
lia, ::nil China all 18 19
2.5 Chartered Mere, of India
London, and China
20 City
100 Colonial 25 38 40
10 Consolidated, lint.
50 Delhi and London, lint
50 East London, lint 5 21 11
20 English and American, lint 10 ... ...
20 English Bank of Rio de Ja-
noiro. lint
20 English, Scottish, and AUS•
tralian Chartered ; all 64 17
284 Hong Kong and Shanghai
Bank Corporation all 36 38
281 Do new 5l 21 24
100 Imperial, lim 2O 15 16
20 Imperial Ottoman lO 24 24 124 4 1
25 lonian all 10 22
25 Do new 5 6 3
Lnd Mortga„o.e. of India, lion 4
100 Do sp. c..1.),q.1861, 30 all 76 76 tO
100 London Bank, of Mexico
and South America, lira. 20 7 6 154 4
100 London and Brazilian, lion. 45 3) 27
20 Do new 74 5 41
100 London &River Plate, lint. 40 6 8
21 Do new 10 14 2 p 114
20 London Chart. of Australia all 231 211
20 London and County 29 404 10; 504
50 Do ue w iss at 20 p.m, 16 pd. 11 ... . .
Loudon Joint 5t0ck........, 1 314 321 324
London and South African al 8: 9
100 London & S.-Western, lint, 20 13 11
50 Loudon &Venezuela, lim l2l ... ...
100 London and Westminster. 20 61 62 5)4 604
100 Do Scrip, iss at 10 pm 2O ... ...
100 Merchant, lint 2.5 6 5
10 Metropolitan, lint.
00 Midland, 1int......
5 National of Australia
25 National of Liverpool, lion l5 3 d 1p
00 National Proviuc. of Ens'il 42 ... ...
10 Do
50 National
20 New South Wales all 41 43
20 North-Western 74
25 Oriental Bank Corporation all 41 42 42
50 Provinc. Bank. Corpo., lint lO 64 54
30 Provincial of Ireland 25 09 94
10 Do new. all ... ...
100 Stand. of Brit. S. Africa, lint 25 14 1 i
100 Do issued at 6 pin lO 8 G
25 Union of Australia all 47 48
100 Union of Ireland, lint
50 Union of London l5 374 384 n5l

tAJLVA:iIII.-L (EU V .16 tiA 411.21 i A IJUIT

GENERAL IN THE .DIVOECE COURT.

The case of " Sykes v. Sykes and Smith" was heard on
Wednesdayin the Divorce Court--a husband'spetition for a
lissolution of marriage on the ground of his wife's
sdultery with Major General Michael William Smith.
rho case, as stated for the petitioner, set forth
that he married the respondent in December 1856, at
rslarylebone, and in 1864 they went to India. The peti-
tioner was there appointed aide-de-camp to the co.,
espondcnt, General Smith, was a married man,
end the petitioner and respondent resided in hit
house. In the summer of 1367 the petitioner came to
England for the benefit of his health, and the co-respon-
lent appeared to have come to England at the same time.
Some time after their arrival the petitioner was removel
to his father's lodgings in consequence of ill health ;
but owing to insutlicieney of room in the how,
the respondent did tot accompany him. There
seemed subsequently to have been some altercation about
the respondent's conduct with General Smith, and the
petitioner wrote a letter to the General, returning a
bracelet that he had given to Mrs. Sykes. In the
autumn of 1867 the co-respondent took apartments at
Bayswater under the name of "Jones," and stated that
he expected his wife, " Mrs. Jones." It was alleged by
the petitioner that the respondent assumed that character,
end in December of the same year the co-respondent took
rooms in Northumberland-street.

The defence was that the petitioner was also guilty of
adultery, and a private detective detailed how he had
watched the petitioner and followed him into a house with
a Mr. Pearce. But the case set up by the co-reele•n-
dent was not convincing, and the jury found for the peti-
tioner on all the issues, and against the respondent as far
as regards Captain Sykes's adultery.