The Sun.
London, England, 1869-05-27 00:00:00

no. Conrrnr...
Do. Account
iliteniala. 0 per Celt
Honduras Gov Rail. Lod D., 10p. Ct., all pd
lt,iian 5 per Cent., 1865 lO9l

Do. Account ..
Do NlNremrnana ltaii,ay —
kl ezicar. 3 per Cent
Ditto for Account
Dn. 1864 —
Do 4 per Cent. Anglo-Freueli —
.0 ontevidotr, G per Cent.
~ —
'ilc :Ilan Imperial 5 per Cent
New Granada lB 171
Do 3 per Con. —

_ _ n
Do. Deferred -
Pirucian 5 per Cent. 1865
Do AccouTit .. 73 i
Do 4i per Cont. (lii•lalrren)
Do 4i OCT Cont.. 1862 .... , -
Do Account
Port.,.g.lese 3 per Ct., 1853, '6, 7, '9,'60,'2.' 314
Do. do. 1867
DS. do. Scrip, ..C2O pail _.-.
ltussian 5 tor Cent., 1822, X St
Do 4} per Cent . 1850
Do 44 per Ccnt:, 1860
Do 3 per Cent., 1859
Do 5 per Cent., 1862
Do do, Scrip — pn.
Do. Anglo-Dutch, 1861, £lOO Booth..
Do. du. £B4 15s. d 0..,
Do., 1866, £lOO Bonds B9
Do. d...) J.:84 13s. do —
Po Nicolas Bail way 6l}
Sar imian a per Cent —
Spanish 3 per Con ..•
Do. Account
Do. 1867
Do. Account
Do. New Deferred —
Do. Account
Do. Passive
Do. Coro. Cert. of Coui. nut funded
Do. Account.
Swedish Provincial Mortgage Loan —
Do Government, 1864
Do dc, 1868
Turkish 6 wr Cent. -
Do Account
Do 6 per Cent. 1858 .•. --
Do Account
Do £lOO Bonds —
Do 6 per Cent., 1862 —
Do Account
Do .£IOC Bonds 69
Do 5 per Client. 1865
D:.) Account
Do 6 per Cent., 1860
Do 1 por Cent., Guaranteed •••
i)o Laud Warrants (Hectares)
Venezuela 3 per Cent. —
Do. Acc•ant
Do 6 per Cent., 1862
Do 6 per Cent. 1864
Dividends on the abovo payable iu .Loudon

Austrisu o psr Cent. Ex 10 Florins - •
Belgian, 44 per cent. Ex. 2
i•sf.
Dutch per Cont. Ex. 12 GO, 5
Do. 4 per Cent. Certificates ..... —
Do. Account. —
French Rentes, 3 per Cent.. Ex. 2M. —
Italian 5 per Cont. 1831, E. 25f.
Do Account 57
CLOSING PRICES.

inFols, Money 931
Do. Account, June 1 ., 931

POLICE INTELLIGENCE.— Vas Day.

110 W-STREET.
SLLLING SPIRITS "WITHOUT A LICENSE.—A. person
named Stubbs, the keep:,r of a refreshment-house, No. 4,
Little Queen-street, was charged with selling spirits with-
out a lie, nse.
An Excise officer said he went into the shop and order,-d
soma ale, oysters, and a glass of brandy, will which he
was supplied by a female attendant. Ile had a pint of
ale, a small glass of brandy, some oysters, and a little
bread and butter, for which he was cha-ged 55
had previously to entering thi slop left another officer
outside the house. He was not asked for the maaey before
he was supplied with the articles.
Another officer sail he was watching the house on tha
night o the 23d of February he saw a man leave Mr.
Stubbs' shop after the officer went in, and go to the public-
house opposite, from which he returne,l carrying a Tian
measure of ale. He (dui officer) then went in and in-
quired whether any spirits had boen sold to the man who
had just left, and was informad that none had been sup.
plied. He was 15 pals from the house.
The &fondant, on being questioned relative to the trans-
action by the supervisor of the district, said that he had
not trangressed the law, and that whatever he had served
he bad obtained from the licensed victualler's opposite.
Some witnesses were called for the defendant, who
stated that the defendant was in the habit of seLding to
their houses for spirits, malt liquor, and wine. A lad
stated that ho was in the habit of fetching small quantities
of liquor and spirits for the defendant, but he could not
say that on the particular night in question he went for
the brandy ordered by the officer.
Sir T. Henry said it had not been conelu ively proved
to
mannerirciiul ini iititn
ilstl,it the offence had been committe,l. Under those
circumstances
exciselt a doubt,oin officer
occasionedhad got
upby
thethe eareless
evidence,
thefe
and therefore he dismissed the summons.