The Sun.
London, England, 1846-02-12 00:00:00

COURT OF ALDERMEN,

A Court was held on Tuesday for the dispatch of
public business, and sat till a late hour.
Alderman PATIEBROTHER stated that he had received
a letter from one of the Livery Companies on the subject
of the necessity of opposing any Parliamentary Bill as
to charitable trusts which might be introduced in the
present session, and requesting the attention of the
Court to such measures. The papers were referred to a
Committee of the whole Court.

SWORN BROKERS.
Several gentlemen having been called to the bar of the
Court to be sworn in as brokers, and asked the usual
questions, whether they had ever been unfortunate in
business, to which they replied in the negative,
Alderman COPELAND rose and said, there was another
question which ought to be put to applicants to be
sworn in as brokers. Each of them ought to be asked
whether he had ever practised as a broker? He sug-
gested snch question in consequence of observing
amongst the applicants several who were known to have
violated the rule, and thus subjected themselves to penal-
ties.—(Hear, hear.)
A member thought it would be unfair to call upon the
applicant; to criminate themselves.
The applicants were sworn in without being subjected
to any further examination, although Alderman Cope-
land and other members of the Court have frequently
brought forward instances of gross frauds which spring
from the laxity observed towards those who have acted
in the capacity of brokers.

RE-ESTABLISHMENT OF THE SOUTHWARK JUSTICE ROOM.

The Court proceeded to the consideration of a
petition of the inhabitants of the Borough of South-
wark, for the re-establishment of the Justice-room
at the Town-hall, Southwark, by the Court of
Aldermen. Mr. Cowen appeared for the petitioners, and
represented upon their part that the great increase of
the population of the Borough, and the removal of the
police magistrates' office from Union-hall to a place less
convenient, on account of its distance to the districts
in which the Aldermen:used to exercise their jurisdiction,
rendered the re-establishment of the Town-hall indis-
pensably necessary. The revival of the magisterial
business at the Town-hall was, he urged, also necessary
as a preservation of the privileges granted by a great
variety of charters to the City of London, and which
were endangered by the abandor.ment of the jurisdiction
exercised for so long a period by the civic magistrates.
Alderman H. HUGHES observed upon the importance
of the question considered as a matter of privilege to the
City, as well as a matter of convenience to the inha-
bitants. Formerly there existed a distinct clashing be-
tween Union-hall and the Borough office, but the re-
moval of the metropolitan police establishment to
Stone's-end seemed to countenance the necessity of re-
verting to the old plan. He considered, at all events,
that the question ought to go to a committee, before
which it could, with all its details, be most properly ex-
amined.—(flear, hear;). '

Fries

27
45
23
1G
26%

Price

19!ii
74

240
16)i
29

6%
15y.C,
le%
3

2/. 28.
205
1/. Is.

44
180
210

Price.

166
160
225
162
14'

7%
14%
11%
4%
7%
14%

Alderman COPELAND said the lecture just given by
Alderman Wilson was certainly very much out of place.
He had yet to learn why the Aldermbn, performing their
various duties as they did without remuneration, and
paying heavily in the course of the performance
of these onerous duties, should not be permitted to do as
they pleased with the time at their command. He was
yet to learn why any control should be exercised over
them.—(Hear, hear.) It happened that the Commis
sioner of the City Police was in a very different predi-
cament. Mr. Harvey was the paid servant of the City,
and was, as the paid servant, under an obligation to
devote the whole of his time to the service of the City
in that capacity.—(Hear, hear.) Mr. Harvey had no
surplus time, and was well paid for all he did as an officer
of the Corporation. Many of the members of that Court
were connected with railroads.
Alderman WiLsoN—lndeed !
Alderman COPELAND—Yes, indeed ; and many of the
members of this Court have been most shamefully tra-
duced by the press. I understand the sinister insinua-
tion of Alderman Wilson ; and, I repeat, that many of
us have been most scandalously calumniated. I admit
that I have been connected with half-a-dozen railway
' companies, and more, for my own personal aggrandise-
ment, as well as for, I trust, the good of the country.—
(Hear, hear.) lam far from saying that I entered into
speculations, or that I would enter into such speculations
without the expectation of putting money in my own
pocket. I never entertained a thought of the kind.—
.(Hear, hear.) With respect to the notice of a motion of
mine on the paper on the incompatibility of the duties of
the office of Commissioner of City Police' with an en
gagement in any other sort of business, I shall reserve
that for the other Court, which alone can deal with it.
Alderman HUMPRERY said that Mr. Harvey certainly
only belonged to one railway company ; but how far he
might have speculated in railways. nobody had a right
to inquire.—(Hear, hear.) There was one thing neces-
sary to be impressed upon the Court. Although Mr.
Harvey had been so long as seven years at the head of
the City police, he was still upon the minkaaa salary,

.
Alderman WILSON said he should be happy to second
the reference of this question to a committee; but he
apprehended serious difficulties in the way of the re-
newal of the magisterial practice in the Borough, without
application to the Government. He hoped, if the re-
establishment of the Town-hall should take place,
the Aldermen below the chair would participate with
their seniors in the performance of the duties.—(Hear.)
Sir PETER LAURIE did not feel the least objection to
investigation into the subject by a committee. The
merits of the question would be there made apparent,
and it would be shown that a more untenable proposition
than the re-establishment of the Town-hall could not
be made. The organisation of the Metropolitan police
had completely: swamped the duties of the Aldermen
at the Guildhall. The fines levied in the Borough
were, by the Metropolitan Police Act, set apart for the
support of the police fund, and the officers of that police
made a point never to bring a case to the Town-hall. In
fact, if an Alderman attempted to send a fine to the
Chamberlain (the course pursued before the passing of
the Metropolitan Police Act), he would be subject to a
penalty of 1001. Was it probable that an interposition
to the prejudice of that establishment would be per-
mitted ?—(Sear, hear.) What was the state of the
Town-hall after the Metropolitan police appeared ?
Why, the Alderman who sat there was like the man set
up in a potato-field.—(A laugh.) Nothing, he was de-
termined, should induce him to permit himself to be set
up as a scarecrow. He would go no more upon a fool's
errand to the Town-hall.--(Laughter.) The Court of
Aldermen might as well think of joining Marylebone and
Finsbury to the City, on matters of justice, as of draw-
ing the Borough again into their jurisdiction. Why the
Metropolitan police laughed at the Town-hall magis-
tracy. They owed it no obedience, and as a matter of
course the assumption of jurisdiction was a mere matter
of ridicule.—(Laughter.)
Alderman COPELAND said, that when in 1836 it was
his duty to go to the Town-hall to officiate, he found that
there was no occasion for his services, and he heard from
the Metropolitan Police officers that they had orders
never to bring any cases before the Aldermen there.
The performance of his duties at that office was then
limited to the reading of a newspaper over the fire for
an hour and a half.—(A laugh.) If the Court should
consider the recommendation of the re-establishment
of the Town-hall, he should take particular care to
oppose any proposition to the effect that the duties
should be performed by a salaried officer.—(Hear, hear,
and murmurs.) He could not shut his ears against the
reports, but the object was to fill the bench at the Town-
hall with a person who was to be remunerated. He
always said so, and he was determined to oppose any
project of the kind.
Alderman FAREBOTSIER suggested the reference of the
petition, and the various documents connected with the
question, to the Town Clerk. the City Solicitor, and the
City Remembrancer, with instructions to draw up a case
for the opinion of counsel.
Alderman CorEearrp approved of the reference com-
prehending the opinions of counsel given, when the sub-
ject was on former occasions moot« 1.
Alderman HUMPHREY said there would have been
abundant cases at the Town-hall if Sir Peter Laurie
had not intimated that he would not sit there except
the fines to which the metropolitan police fund was
entitled were paid to the City Chamberlain. To such a
course the Police Commissioners objected, and cases
were therefore likely to be decided in such places in
which the claim of the fund was recognised. The Com-
missioners of Police, as well as the Magistrates of the
Borough, were desirous that the Aldermen should sit at
the Town-hall.
Sir PETER LAURIE said nothing could be more erro-
neous than the opinion that any man could' exact a fine
in the Borough except a justice appointed to perform the
police duties.
After some further discussion the petition and docu-
ments were referred.
THE CITY COMMI.MONER.

The report of the Committee appointed to take into
consideration the letter of the Commissioner of the City
Police on the subject of an increase of salary, was
brought up. It recommended that the salary of that
officer should be increased, and was signed by twelve
aldermen.
Alderman H. HUGHES was decidedly of opinion that
the pay of the City Commissioner should be made equal
to that of each of the commissioners of metropolitan
police. If the city were to have a Commissioner of police
at all, they ought to pay him properly for the perform-
ance of his duties. If such an;office were not necessary,
they ought to get rid of him at once.
Alderman SIDNEY strongly advocated the claims of
the Commissioner of the City Police, who performed all
the duties of his office with distinguished ability, and
certainly merited a larger amount of remuneration for
his services.
Sir PETER LAURIE declared it to be his opinion that
the Commissioner was amply paid for his exertions as
head of the city police, and was enabled to devote
part of that time which ought to be given up altogether
to the police service to railroad speculation.—(Mur-
murs.) It could not be denied that the Commissioner
was deputy-chairman in a railroad affair, so that the
citizens had only part of his services, and the fact was
that he was better paid than either Colonel Rowan or
Mr. Mayne. Sir Peter Laurie expressed some surprise
at the very positive manner in which Alderman Sidney,
who had had but very few opportunities of judging of
the efficiency of the police, described the talents and zeal
of the Commissioner, and said the Court could not
interfere with the salary of officers appointed by the
other Court.

Alderman WILSON said that Alderman Sidney had
already proved himself to be a most able, indefatigable,
and zealous magistrate, and was incapable of giving an
opinion upon such a matter without sufficient ground,
and without being master of the subject. As for rail-
ways, the Commissioner had nothil g to do with them,
as a director or provisional-committeeman. Perhaps he
had some connexion with one ; but why had he not a
right to give his surplus time to form one railroad com-
pany, when so many gentlemen at that moment in the
Court were connected with half a dozen.—(Laughter
and murmurs.) He hoped the Court would not with-
hold an increase of salary from an officer who so well
deserved it.

after having made himself well acquainted with the duties
of the office, and performed them in the most efficient

manner.

The report was ultimately agreed to.
OPEN VOTING FOR THE MAYORALTY.

Alderman COPELAND rose to move, " That on all
future elections for Lord Mayor of this city, when the
return is made by the Livery to the Court of Alder-
men, the election be open voting." He was induced to
submit a motion to that effect in consequence of the
statements made in the newspapers as to the number of
Aldermen who had voted upon certain occasions, when the
Livery returned two members of that Court as fit and
proper persons to serve the office of Mayor.—(Hear,
hear.) He had given offence, as he understood, to some
of the legal officers of the Corporation, in consequence
of having intimated his belief that such information
could not have been obtained without the knowledge of
one of the officers who officiated when what was called
the " scratching" took place. He did not see why the
Court should be liable to the misrepresentations which
were set afloat in matters of this sort ; and he did not
know of any course calculated so effectually to get rid
of the existing anomaly as open voting.—(Hear.)
The RECORDER suggested the propriety of making
inquiry whether " scratching " for Lord Mayor bad not
originated in some standing rule or order, which it
might be necessary to remove before the open voting
was substituted.

Sir P. LAURIE said that no one ever doubted bow he
voted, and of course no one ever asked him the ques-
tion. His vote was always so open that it was impos-
sible to mistake it. He certainly knew of no instance
iu which a member professed to vote for one member
and certainly voted for another.
Alderman 'WATSON said upon one of the occasions al-
luded to by Alderman Copeland, he went round to the
Aldermen, and asked each of them how he voted, and
all answered him except one. He said to that one that
as the refusal to answer implied that the voter meant to
vote for the candidate who had the smallest chance of
success, the name should be taken down accordingly,
and the numbers upon that calculation were taken.
He could not see how any man should be ashamed of
voting as his conscience directed.

Alderman HUMPHREYS wished, if the Court objected
to open voting, that a regular• ballot should take place.
Sir WILLIAM MAGNAY said, the object sought for
could be obtained if the Lord Mayor would publicly
state the numbers epon both sides.—(Hear, hear.)
The RECORDER said, it appeared to him to be rash to
make any alteration without inquiry. The power of
"scratching" was, he believed, of very long duration.
Alderman HUMPHREY said, the Recorder's predecessor
lost his situation by " scratching," but it was a sort of
" scratching" of a different kind from that to which the
Court alluded, inasmuch as the one only caused the loss
of a mayoralty, but the other was very near causing the
loss of a life. There were two men in Newgate, uuder
sentence of death, and one of them was ordered for
execution. The late Recorder, however, "scratched"
the name of the wrong man, and if that " scratching"
had not been detected, and Lord Denman been referred
to, the wrong man would have been hanged as sure as
he was " scratched." The " scratch," or the " tuck,"

as he believed it was called in the case of hanging, in-
stead of sending a fellow creature out of the world
whose life it was intended to spare, served the very use-
ful purpose of making room for the present Recorder,
whose place it would be so difficult to supply.---(Hear.)

' LAW INTELLIGENCE.
SECONDARIES' COURT, Fth. 11.
(Before Mr. Secondary POTTER.)

V. MATTHEW'S.
This was an action brought to recover the sum of 8/: Ss•
fur a monument erected in the East London Ceinetery.
The defence was that credit had been given, and that the
time had not expired.
George Mills, a workman in the employ of the prove o
ntifti
proved the erection of a monument over the family gat
the defendant, on the death of one of his children in Augli.
last. The price was very reasonable ; 10 guineas "Nig, d
have been a fair charge for ready money. had aPPILea.
for the amount, and defendant did not then say anYtinnl
about credit having been given. The inscription Was
under the direcons of the defendant..
Mr. superintendent of the cemetery, was called, and
said that six months' time was allowed after the grant or
1.1
c 0,.?:
vevance of the ground for the erection of a monument.
of
however declined giving an opinion as to the custc!in
giving six months' credit for tombs erected there.
Mr. 'lrwin:, for the defendant, said that the defend fat_
would have been willing to pay at the expiration of the ti;
of credit, which he should prove was given for six 1,0°12,
lie also contended that even tke governors of the cemetery
could not enforce payment for the ground till the six rnonof
as the whole contract was not completed till the erection
the tomb, or the iver of riht.
The SECONDARYwag said that the jury had nothing to do With
the custom of t ceeter.
Two witnesses he
werem calleyd, who swore positively that tbeY
•
pl
heard aintiff aree to ive six months' credit. for
The jury,. after consulting a short time, gave a verdict
the plaintiff.
Mr. HUGHES applied to have the record retained on ths
ground that the verdict was contrary to evidence. to
The SECONDARY said it was a matter of fact fcr the ilir; 0
determine, and he saw no reason to say they had not co—
a just conclusion.

POLICE INTELLIGENCE.
MANSION-ROUSE. Lad
Alderman FAREEROTHER, who sat for the , tbe
Mayor, stated that the Lord Mayor had receives'
following communication from the water-bailiff is--Q46,
Eleven A.M., 10th Feb., l' joet
I ply Lord,--I regret to learn that a young We of sr.
her • lite in consequence of the insecure state 0..1.,....1
Francis's pier, Essex street, but yesterday were
am, my Lord, your faithful Servant, vnEftS•
N. SAUsss-- nip
A young man, who was pot-boy at a publie"hrogsss -A
the neighbourhood of the Mansion House, was Ac ii rob'
by his master upon suspicion of having committed
bery of a serious description in the house. he the
The complaint was first made on Tuesday, 'v."1;0 es
complainant stated as follows :—The prisoser,'",, cota.
treated, on account of his abject poverty, that wis 4.0*
plainant would give him employment, some ween,i,. el",
at any wet k and at any price, and was accorweebe c"
vated to the condition of pot• buy, for the perforn, wee).
the duties of which he received two shillings Pe
Bad O.
Having heard a dispute between the pot-boy
rrog
female servant, the complainant insisted upon,h-acesse°
' formed of the cause, and was told that the girl ;vett
the boy of taking a shilling, which was her Pir,e'oes'
'
The boy denied the truth of the charge, with t'oeistr
tremendous oaths, and swore in the samediabohe tor.
ner that he had not a shilling in the world ; hbehe 00
being some reason to question his assurance 000 a the
wholly without money, his hand was opened, 's„is sit
sum of 10/. 4s. 6d. was found in it. As Psre"ooo.l
trunks belom,ing to seamen and others were fregolot
eft in the care of the landlord, and as a bobdrunkte iit
had left in the house on the previous night a it or
which it was supposed there might be raorleYS °pelf'
curred to the complainant that the pot-boy ha self
the box with a false key, and thus possessed 1111" 'lll°
property to an amount never before held by hird'bidso
complainant's view of the case was strengthens „vois;
assurance of a little boy, the pot-boy's brother, .ce,
dared that the prisoner, upon entering the sertl-nderer
not a farthing in the world in his possession. sub
the circumstances, it was considered nocessarY td°ool,ll
the case to the judgment of a magistrate, Of big by"
sonar, who said the money was the produce 0,
earnings in many situations, was remanded. iiatlit:i
Yesterday the prisoner was again brought up'bo% -4
publican stated that the seaman who owned the oft A
been at the house, and said that he had not Or
money in the box. The conduct of the pot- .0
bcl2,ll'
ever, in swearing so hard to the truth of a lie, worlsiel
culated to make such an impression that the °ilea,:
ant still believed the boy had got the cash dish lye rt,
Mr. Pelham, who appeared as solicitor te001.,6"
soner, stated that there was not the slightes,t, garb. io(l.„dr.
the charge ; that the prisoner was an exceceiNg ev_i•
trious and economical lad, who had put by all ~, ploTis
logs, and found it necessary, in the various 1 0,614
in which he laboured for his bread, to pretelinder°
was totally destitute, or he would be soon
gain.
1,1
all he had, and perhaps murdered into the bargna i tv
The complainant—But he swore so despere""
he had not a shilling. OP
Alderman FA.REBROTRER—The swearing wesny 11°
but who ever knew a drunken waiter to lock the iiiastaa
money in his box ? There is no proof at all ag.,lllr
lad, and he is, of course, discharged, and I hope
care of his money. A
~.„.. -.....,_ Of
MERITORIOUS CONDUCT
SEAMAN REWARDED. bile
(From the Devonport Independent.) bsteot
It is doubtless in the recollection of our readers, i. i•
her Majesty's ship Queen was lying in the Sound, 5116
fellow, called John Hughes, saved the life of
by jumping from the mizen-chains into the ;ot Ogi,
are pleased to find that the Koval Humane S°c'fitl° 4
awarded him a medal, as a reward for his intrepid:refs ell
On Sunday last, after divine service, the ,eir fi
lipo
crew being on the quarter-deck Captain ~.Ir. g ,/
Leeke presented the medal, and addressed t'terollf
tar in the following gratifying and approprist,'s ~ tbe,„d'ts
John Hughes—l told you some time ago, ii3'e"„ay ,ssts
was at anchor in the Sound, that I would reconee,„Adi
the members of the Royal Humane Society for s:;001ri,
note the intrepidity of your conduct in so gallantly‘ 10iit
from the mizen-chains of this ship into t
o ear
_:ft
to save the life of one of your si,„iP,I3I;,,e,SOS, 0
had fallen from the' main-top-sail yard. l'",'„" ,t Stilid k
Society, always ready to reward gallant conduct to iLsO
yours, has anticipated my wishes by forwarditijA ripfl
medal, to deliver to you, expressive of the vdilet; iil
they entertain of your gallant and generous co sed;
I take the opportunity of assembling the officers nte
company together upon the quarter-deck to-ui,ioi° 0
assured it will be a source of great gratificatilsesitho;
receive such a token presented to you by your bips/p0
the name of the Society, in the presence of you da
and equally gratifying to them to know that o; sys
and disinterested conduct, such as yours, is al scram git IS
elated, and will always be rewarded. I lay Meet' spoirfbioti,
those words, your gallant conduct, because -1-., ove, beo4
an easy matter, perhaps, for any person to jihs'Ar good (04,
but that man must be possessed of a bold et—illte 19
who can jump from the mizen-chains of a I'4 t. (0
(0
height of a frigate's fore-yard) into the water, W.,tallloll
of being seized by the other poor fellow who is stWad 5 06
life, and both going down together. I will non' ,sry wt.
the letter which I have received from the Secre",ittbjecji&
Royal Humane Society, addressed to me upon theii, ifd.
Storehouse, Jarh., fißii:
Sir,—On the part of the Committee of I,l'loulol
Society, I beg to forward you, through the ine,,-,,i-ots se
tails Maurice, R.N., one of the Vice-Presw-sswo
society, a bronze medal, which was unanimouslY.,,;tyr
John Hughes, a seaman on board her Ainf (raistr
Queen, for his intrepid conduct in the monw,,,,lia.„‘" 10
last, in the attempt to rescue a fellow-creature "s aals;t 0
ing, with a respectful solicitation that runtleGiti!
pleased to take an early opportunity of prese',oa,,Bll
him. The Committee take leave to suggest t°,101011710;
might be desirable to present John Hughes the •:"tisew‘sic."
presence of the ship's eompany, as they conceive oci,gat
to his gratification if such a course were adoptesi,esty6ooo
was pursued a short time since on board her 111.440 °v
Caledonia, under similar circumstances.—l have ,ary
to be, Sir, your obedient humble servant, SOP-. ''
HENRY PERRY, Honorary ogee. tot!
To Sir Henry Leeke, K.H., her Majesty's ship ‘4 Bar P!
I wish to say a few words on the subject Of "ntrer:pot
welfare, and to beg that the medal you have 11° coto,:ctif
as a distinguished mark of valour and generositfa dive, f te,
may lead you to set a high value upon a irc)„,es, ei ho
and let me urge you, as well as your shipiel4 smog',
bear in mind that no man can get on in this ,'' t 0,107,
it; get the better of drunkenness, which 1004 PO
breaking and to everything that is bad ; , begle
remember that you are now a young man, alines-0 es four
life, with seven or eight years servitude towards r:411,i.,,,n010/0/
and that a steady perseverance in good behaviour,' of ""erslit
teen years more, ensure to you a yearly sll7,iissw-Od
awarded by the kind feeling of the Lords C0°240d6,180,1'i
the Admiralty to Seamen for length of ser„'"tl4„),,e;
will render your life comfortable. I3efot sse"'„,l;
you all, let me say, I have felt great pleasure win es vet
..,n
in the ship's so much improvement eompanY,et the O,
spect ; the leave-breaking is now but trifling; '"and o,ips,"
of that, and go on in your desire to be active. "ie 0'
duty, and this ship will, I am sure, befere long'
and happy a ship as any in the service.
Vd°l!;
-IC
......,, 0
.1000 10 I
1 s

FACTS AnD HINTS CONCERNING GAs•":„ltllSjettbiL°
where the consumption of gas is very greats se'r 1,0 with
sold at a good price, the charge for gas is 75.,.P5e1l it nof ,;
feet ; and the engineers profess they canll°"untptie-0,
profit at less. In Plymouth, where the cons is only the te:t
is small, the price of the same quantity of gas„,sibi aeoie`is
and I find upon inquiry, that this has been ea,draaril'iloti,u,
mation of a new company, under the direction,l,4o'ol3rl;lo ssiip
of Mr. Huch ism, engineer of the London Gas C° r bat,o
it that this gentleman can consistently re 79. OP:01Po,
of gas, where the consumption is small, at, feet lfect e°,if
cubic feet, and charge 7s. 6d. per 1,000 cub',one siwi irjea'sfir
consumption is so much larger? There 1s ut prolito 0.14
nected with gas which ought to be WI:41,11d estab,4s
before the public, viz. that every parish 010 ing ]fralte 1
own gas works, and, instead of annually-
,l)taLtitex to tech
into the pockets of gas companies, expendt!„haritY, °
provement of the parish, the extension '2,"der, jot
tion of poor-rates.— Correspondent of the Droiti,ightlijt in tht
DEVIL'S DUST IN HOSIERY.--The due;
nal mentions the recent introduction of " dr, obser.,vfo' shTs„
manufacture of hosiery. Our Coutemporatriacio_-' 01 ;
;meriting the distressed state of the. hosier:, frall,soc
nearly the whole system of nv.inufactuplflud up;sineWdoto
come highly immoral, and consists ot,",,,,atrinq iredace,ire
amongst the rest, is a I:Aghable one IN:: wool irnritsk." $
the
of cotton, and while they are wet, ;
'll reel3Ul°
the state of the well known article e thus I?,,ett
" Devil's Dust," is blown upon then?, ad"ecoives_ ewer° toood,
sort of clothy-nap appearance which old w,;iese g
workmen. A specimen was shown to Lecture. ought
loss for some time to comprehend its boa th 5
..zre,
are made by a house that has hitherto
e-
respectable. respectable." at COO-
named Taylor, has been admitted whco_'6oateref°_,
One of the speakers at the late meet calnfrs in t)e_
house. This man with his wife and
tt 000;11
house also, costs the parish of Hain, aVbtie
is part, upwards of 15s. a week An 89 A Vrel tbe
sources he was expected to find food, on on
ito dent.
lodging, fuel, and clothing,
lyriirnatstrce fgellereg:•_4Pegt:i
THE SHIP TORY.—It is a curiouscnotice the ?:icol:
bestilardp iaost etchtei °PIZ° trhlaatwo is, which
hc
i4iafieNsb- r?d-- fa t d
wereat.:o4
to this vessel, which has excited se owner
a:11.'0..40,7w y
public mind, that the crest or arms o_ the a
~00dy a tot
eneonce
about to strike n, it wtas eireal9;ient,
'the vessel. And thus sign. 01'
,s,hholuclitilehreolfsaapmpaairlelnioulydlng in his hand
af'
object, 1)18y g
_44,13
actually painted on the stern of
Dock-baslo!
auci,
aud bl
as
noticed while she was lying in the its _
is worthy of remark, shnply becan „meg of ;_l„ vessel 0"
frig:h_ti_u_eii
se..
sTe_li. loom
sintiescioennsretueednocen
for the IllutC"
on ID!, „,.to, The
the ocean again, being
obfoarthdeN,Ali'eirise'
CI4YI ago, for a cargo of cotton.