The Sun.
London, England, 1846-04-21 00:00:00

W.L3T.CIL-.V,7 0 1&X.3

Name of Company.

Dividend Amount
per of Paid.
Annum. Share.

Fast London.. ..... • ••

X s,
100 0

Grand Junction ..
Kent
Vauxhall ::

West Middlesex .... 51. s's. pr mt. ( G 3 12 9

CANALS.
Dividend(
Names of ,f. ,Dividend ;„ Names of 0••
Companies. A per .rice. companies. t per Price.
Fei lm\ Annum. la Annum.
4 £
Ashtn & 01.111 97 51.55. pci 70 Monmontbsh 100 81. 160
Ashby-d-la-Z 113 41. 70 3lntgomrysh 100 At. 98
I farnsley -.. 160; 121. 180 Macclesfield . 1001 - 33
Basingstoke.. 100 - . - Neath .•• • • • 100 171 340
Brknk&Abrg 150 j 5!. ; 83 Nottingham . 150 12/. -
Cromford.... 100 141. 150 Peak Forest .I 78 3/. 68
Dudley ....• • 100; 4/. - Regent's ... • 33 11. 55. , 25
Derby .. .. . . 'loo' Cl. ,1 73 Rochdale .... 85 41. i 77
Ellsmre&Chs 133; 4/. j 65 Shropshire .. 125 81. -
Erewash •• . 1001 321. : 300 Somrset Coal' ISO 71. 10s. 130
Forth & Clyd 1001 41. - Do.Lk Fd St! 12 6/. p. c. 11
GrandJunctn 100 i 71. 95 Stifrd&Worcll4o 281. 300
Grand Unicn 100 11. 10s. - Shrewshury..ll2s 151. 230
Glamorgnsh . 1721 13%1. 210 Stourbridge -1145 20!. 280
Glstr&Brkly, 'OO - - Strtfrdon At' 79 11. 10s. -
Grantham • • 1501 121. 100 Severn and 1
Huddersfield., 57 - - Wye Rail. 26 11. ile. 32
Kennt & AVIV 39; 7s. 6d. 10% Trnt & Mr-1 50 301. -
Lancaster ... 47 1/. 10e. - Bey, 14 sh.j
Leeds& Livrp 100, 341. 520 Thams &Med 19 - -
Leicester .... 140, 101. 105 Worcstr 851 78 21. 44
Leicstr &Nth 83; 41. 60 Binning.
Leughboregh 142( 701. 050 Wilts k Btks 67 11. 11
•_____-_,-..-...-....
COURSE OF EXCHANGE.-(THIS DAY.)
Amsterdam ...... C.F. 12 10% Gibra1tar.............. -
Dine, at sight - .... 12 7% Leghorn ........ ••.. - 30 75
Rotterdam .... ••2 U. 12 11 Genoa - ...... --• • .. 26 20
Antwerp •......... .. .. 25 20 Milan . -
Mexaburgh -- - MB. 14 Venice .... .... - -
Altona • • ........ ••• • • • - Naples ••••••• • • • • • .- 39X
Paris, 3 days' sight .... 25 90 Palermo, per fa 119%
Ditto, 3 months.. - - 26 15 Lisbon.. -• • ....
Marseilles ............ 26 20 Oporto •.. ...... • •
80urdeaux............ 26 20 Rio Janeiro
Frankfurt on 3laine.... 123 Bahia .. -
Petershurgh, 3 Us.. - • • - Buenos Ayres -
Berlin .... ..... ....... - New York, 21 days' sight -
Vienna, effee. flo •.• . • • 10 12 Philadelphia .... ..... . -

Berlin .. . •. .. •• • •
Vienna, effec. . • 10 12
Trieste. ditto .... • ..... 10 13
Madrid 36
Cadiz ••• .. : .. • 36

Barcelona .. _

PRICES OF BULLION, PER OZ.
Foreign Gold In bars.. £3 17 9
Portugal Gold Coin 3)7 5
New Doubloons ...... 0 0 0
New Dollars ....... • 0 0 0
Silver in bars • . 0 4 11

Seville.. -

EXCHEQUER.-(THIS DAY.)
(Sittings in Banco.)
READ V. TAIT.

Mr. KNOWLES moved fur a new trial in this case, which
was tried at the late assizes at Northumberland, before Mr.
Justice Pattesen, when a verdict was given for the plaintiff,
on the ground of misdirection, the verdict being against
evidence. This was an action to recover damages alleged
to have been sustained from negligence on the. part of
the servants of defendant in the management of his
vessel, by which plaintiff's vessel was run down.
The plea to the declaration was not guilty, and se-
condls-, that the plaintiff was not possessed t,f any vessel
The circumstances out of which the case arose were these:—
The plaintiff was the owner of a ship called the Providence,
and the defendant the owner of a vessel called the Virgil.
On the night of the collision the two vessels were off the
Lincolnshire coas?, soiling in different directions. The Provi-
dence from the south to the north, and the Virgil from the north
to the south. The wind was westerly. According to rule in
such casa the defendant's vessel should pass on the larboard
and at the trial it was sworn on behalf of the plaintiff
that defendant's vessel altered her course. The witnesses for
defendant said that the proper course; had been kept, but
that the Providence had
itt come up in time, and did net
make the necessary tack had not
too
crews o both vessels.
only wit-
nesses on both sides were th
da:vit
The Learned llounsel read
attorney, in which he alleged tailtaffi• important witness, of
from defendant's
aiidn if his evidence
the name of Brown, was not at the'tar?a,
Under all the were heard the verdict could not stand.
cir-
cumstances, he thought the Court *hold,' have no objection
to grant him a rule.
The CoURT did not think that the Learned Counsel had
alleged sufficient grounds for disturbing the verdict,.—Rule
refused.

FLETCHER V. MARSHALL.

Mr. WATSON moved for a rule to show cause why a non-
suit should not be entered, or why a new trial should not be
had, or why judgment should not be arrested in this case,
which was tried at Liverpool at the late assizes before
Mr. Justice Coleridge, when a ♦erdict was given for
the plaintiff. The declaration stated that the plain-
tiff, who was a_ schoolmaster at Manchester, had given
directions to defendant's shar‘brokers, also of Manchts-
ter, to purchase for him fifty scrip shares in the projected
Essex and Suffolk Railway. 'I he defendant promised to de
so. on which plaintiff paid the money, but defendant did not
deliver the scrip. Tne plea was first non-assumpsit, and
secondly, that a sufficient time had not elapsed for
the delivery of the scrip before the suit was com-
menced. The Learned Counsel contended that from the
terms of the contract there was no such promise made as the
delivery of the scrip within a certain time, that due care
and dEigence merely was promised tote used.—Rule granted.

MARSI)EN V. NEWMARSff.
Mr. WATSON moved for a rule to show cause why a
verdict sheuld not be entered fel. defendsst, or a new
trial had in this case, which was tried before Mr.
Justice Coleridge, at the late assizes at Liverpool, when a
verdict was given for part of the demand to plaintiff, and for
the other part to the defendants. This was anotner railway
tran,action, where the defendants (sharebrokers) were al-
leged not to use due care and diligence in the sale and dis•
po.it ion of certain shares the plaintiff held in the Leeds and
Thirske Railway and the Shrewsbury. and Hereford Railway.
The plea was, first, non-assumpsit ; and, secondly, that the
defendants had not possession of the scrip in question, so as
to dispose of them.—Rule granted.

DIRECT LONDO-N— —A
N-DIVIANCHES-
TER RAILWAY, AND REMINGTON'S INDE-
PENDENT LONDON
DAY.)
. AND MANCLIES kEll
BALM AY.—(THIS
A meeting of the subscribers and scripell olders in this amal-
it'd Company was held at three o'clock this afternoon
consider the
mending the directors io to
were, Bishopsgate.ree
wind up the
l
hother mea-
(Or the interest of the
~he deposits, or to adoptshareholders. Such other mea-
cOr the interest of the shareh,,
There
tendance of shareholders, there being
pre-
tives of upward; 4* 40,(;00 shares.
the chair, and after having briefly opened

amidst great coausioa, said, that S 3 no

gamatoct tromp
Ty
Eli fift4 Ta'
"'PrOer
#raltBiArkik re rn t,
e fo
r wars s. att
SCDt tati
ok
• I 9e(14.'..
_ 01,