The Sun.
London, England, 1846-02-12 00:00:00

" The dividend which the meeting would have to declare
for the half-year ending the 31st of December last, at the
rate of 5 per cent. per annum on the respective shares of the
Company, to b‘corne payable on the Ist of March, would be
as follows:—Viz., 1/. 2s. 6d. per share on the registered
shares (501. paid)—lees property-tax; 12s. 2d. per share on
the registered shares (3W. paid)—less roperty-tax ; 178. 6d.
per share on the scrip shares (40/. paid —less property-tax.
~ RICHARD PAT UZSON, Chairman.

- " Shoreditch, London, Feb. 4, 1846."
The Treasurer's statement showed a balance to the account
of 47,1711 ss. 3d.
The CHAIRMAN, in moving' the report, said that he did not
think it required any explanation ; but he was ready to
answer any question which might be put to him.
Mr. KINNAIRD seconded the adoption of the report.
In answer to several questions from proprietors,
The CHAIRMAN said that the total number of shares in the
Company was 23,108, and out of that number 17,93 had
agreed to take the New Extension Shares. The Eastern
Counties Company had agreed to declare 6 per cent., if the
receipts on the Northern and Eastern should be 132,500/. ;
but as they were only 115,5001., they only declared 5 per
cent.
Resolutions confirmatory of the report were then passed,
and, after a vote of thanks to the chairman and directors, the
meeting separated.

TATTERSALL'S—THIS EVENING
Six o'CLocx.

CHESTER CUP.
8 to 1 agst Wadlow's lot
18 to 1 agst Best Bower
20 to 1 agst hinstone
25 to 1 agst S Wweetmeat—taken
30 to 1 agst Mermaid
40 to 1 ngst Colleen Dhas
50 to 1 agst Weatherbit—taken
50 to 1 agst Libel—taken
100 to 1 agst Advice—taken.

DERBY.

9 to 2 agst Sting
18 to 1 agst Brocardo
20 to 1 agst lago
30 to 1 agst Malcolm
33 to 1 agst Tibtliorpe—taken.

EXCHEQUER.-(T111.8 DAY.)
(Sittings after Term at Nisi Prius, before-the LORD CHIEF
BanoN and a Special Jury.)
DANIELS V. FIELDING.
This was an action to recover compensation in damages
for alleged false imprisonment.
Mr. Jervis, Mr. Hinnfrey, and Mr. Pollock, appeared for
the plaintiff, and Mr. Martin and Mr. Jones for defendants.
The plaintiff, it appeared, was a Avholv,ale perfumer in
Brompton some time since, and was engaged last autumn in
railway speculations, when several transactions took place
between him and the defendants, Mr. George Fielding and
Mr. John Fielding, stockbrokers, at Manchester, by which it
was alleged that a balance became due to defendants.
The defendants, in consequence of an affidavit made
before one of the judges, that the plaintiff was
about to leave the country, obtained a capias
for ,his arrest, and he was accordingly arrested on the
12th of November last. The circumstance which led to
the statement made by defendant in obtaining the capias—
that plaintiff was about to leave the country— was that he
had stated to defendant a short time previously, that he in-
tended to go to France for a few days along with his wife, on
a pleasure excursion ; and the: defendant stated the
fact of his leaving the country, without stating the circum-
stances under which he was leaving, or the time he intended
to be away. On application made to Judge Patteson,
the order was set aside, and the bail discharged, when the
Learned Judge was madelacquainted with the circumstances
under which it was procured. The object, therefore, of the
present action was to obtain damages for what was alleged to
be a malicious arrest.
The affidavits sworn before the Judge were put in, and se-
veral witnesses were examined to prove the above acts, and
that plaintiff had no intention of leaving the country or re-
maining abroad.
Mr. MARTIN addressed the jury at considerable length for
the defence, and contended that there was no malice whatever
in the arrest. All that the defendant wished was security for
the debt.
The Loin) CHIEF BARON then addressed the jury, and
after explaining the law of arrest, adverted to the circum-
stances which had been adduced in evidence, and left the case
entirely in the hands of the jury, who he trusted would
not suppose that in the remarks he made he gave an opinion
one way or other.
The jury, after s short consultation, returned a verdict for
Le plaintiff—Damages 5/.
The Court then rose.

THE EXPRESS
EDITION.

SUN-OFFICE, Half-post ,high,

IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT

(THIS EVENING.)

HOUSE OF LORDS.
The Earl of SHAFTESBURY took his seat on the Woo:
sack a few minutes before Five o'clock.
The Marquis of ELY took the oaths and his seat.
CORN-LAWS. .

The Duke of BUCKINGHAM presented a large
number of petitions from various places in the county of
Bur kingham agAinst the repeal of the duties on corn,
and praying their Lordships not to take any steps with
respect to those duties until an appeal had been made to
the country, in order that the real feeling of the people
might be obtained on the measures brought forward by
her Majesty's Government.
Lord HATIIERTON presented a petition from New-
castle•under-Lyric, in f:itafforishire, signed by 1,500
persons, praying for an immediate and total repeal o'
all the duties which tended to diminish the supply o
food.

in Ireland as ever was known within the
memory of man. It was principally in the
central parts of Ireland that these outrages were com-
mitted. The system increased gradually but rapidly,
and he accused the Government of great neglect, be-
cause even if they had no better means of intelli-
gence that that possessed by the public, they ought
to have been aware of the state of things that
now existed. He had had the honour of
presenting a petition last session, setting forth the state
of Ireland, and asking the interference of the Ministry
on the subject. The state of crime having increased
greatly, it was the duty of the Ministry to take some
steps to prevent that increase. The fault must either
lie in the law or in the mode of its administration.
The law ought to be able to putedown crime, and afford
protection to the honest man, and it would do so, un-
doubtedly, if it were put in force ; but he was afraid
that it was not put in force. If the law was not suffi-
cient, it behoved the Ministry to make such an alteration
it as would suffice for the protection of life and pro-
perty, or to avail themselves of some temporary act
No such thing had been done, for instead of encourag-
ing the honest man, and suppressing the bad one, they bad
encouraged the evil doer, and discouraged the honest man
who had had the manliness to come forwaed and withstand
outrage. The present petition prayed for an improve-
ment in the criminal law. In his opinion in casts
of outrage or murder a fine should be at once inflicted on
the district in which it took place; and further, the
locality should be bound to provide for the person injured,
or for his family in case of murder. Such a course would
have in a great measure the effect of preventing these
crimes, which it seemed the present law could not prevent
At the beginning of the session her Majesty's speech
intimated that some attention vi ould be paid to the sub-
ject, and the language held out was not such as to assure
them that steps would not Le taken to repress the crime
which the state of that country presented. She was
made to say, too, that she observed with regret
at the assassinations which had taken place, and said, in
the very next paragraph, she hoped that measures would
be devised to protect life in that part of the kingdom.
That intimated a doubt of the insufficiency of the present
laws to do so. He was of opinion that it was not life alone
to which their attention should be directed, but also
the outrages that were committed on property. Now
three weeks had elapsed since Parliament had met, and
no notice had as yet been given on the part of the
Government of any improvements to be made in the
existing laws. After the communications which
had been made to the Government in re-
ference to the occurrences to which he alluded
and after the notoriety which had been given to them it
was the duty of the Government to take some measures
—some energetic steps—in reference to them. There
were secret associations and combinations existing which
had engaged the attention of the Repeal Association as
well as that of the Government, and it could not be
denied that a great part of the country was in a state of
insurrection. Immense masses of people had met in
different places, and in the county of Limerick a meeting
had lately assembled in open revolt in mid-day. Another
outrage of a most daring kind within a mile of Ros-
common where a policeman was taken off his horse,
which was immediately shot, and a threat expressed
that a similar fate would happen to himself,
A police barrack also had been demolished
within sight of another police-station. He had
not, however, heard any instance in which the
Lord Lieutenant had not paid immediate attention to
the applications which were made to him at the Castle,
to afford the applicants protection from the dangers
with which they were threatened ; but then he could
not properly attend to every case, or avert all the
dangers, of which the parties complained. Dur-
ing the spring, summer, end winter of the
past year these outrages bad increased to an almost un-
paralleled extent. Last year the Noble Lord who was
then at the head of the Colonial department, but who
Lad since resigned that office (Lord Stanley), said in re-
ply to a question which be (the Marquis of Clanricarde)
put him with regard to the state of Ireland, that " no
coercion" should be exercised to put an end to the out-
rages of which he complained ; but he (the Marquis of
Clanricarde) meant to say that the time had arrived
when coercion was necessary.—(Hear.) When the
returns he had moved for were presented they would
show that it was the lowest class who were the greatest
sufferers and who were least possessed of the means of
defence or flight. Could they wonder then that he was
selected when the property he possessed was not pro-
perly protected by those whose duty it was to do so, and
that he was obliged to succumb to the will of those who
could do him injury, and who consequently exercised
great influence over him? They could not alter the
position of affairs in that country, unless they adopted
an elementary system of legislation with respect to it.
They might talk of devising means to improve the agri-
culture of the country, but he held that it would be
impessible to teach the proprietors or renters of the soil
to do so, if they did not take steps to prevent that
property and necessary expenditure from spoliation and
aggression. With respect to the matter of agriculture,
he could mention a case of one gentleman, who was the
owner of a large farm, which consisted principally of
fine grass land. Last year he was ordered by the
people to give up a portion of this grass land,
in order that some part of it might bo devoted
to the cultivation of potatoes. He was in
the habit of keeping a large number of cattle who con-
sumed the whole of the grass which his farms produced,
the suit being particularly adapted for pasture land. He
yielded and placed some of his cattle in stalls, but this
year the people did not care to have calk, fed in stalk
as ithey would corsume food It hich they required ;
and he thought it prudent to submit to this,
as. he had received an intimation that if he did
not acquiesce he would be compelled to do so.
If he had not been misinformed, the person to whom he
referred tried to ascertain how far he would be sup-
ported by the authority of the country if he
set his face. against those who ttied to coerce
him. That person was, he bileved, in communication
with the Castle of Dublin, and received certainly, if not
public, at least private advice, that the wisest course
would be not to expose his property, but to
give way, as he had done.—(llear, hear.) He
knew that in the present state of Roscommon
there was no protection for property, and he did Nimbi, r
the advice good if there was no protection for life
or property. He would not go into party matters ; he
would not inquire how far political mismanagement had
to do with the troubles of that country, but he would say
that some thing ought to be done in the shape
of an efficient administration of the criminal law.
They bad now met three weeks, and no steps
had been taken for that purpose. The returns he had
moved for would, he was convinceeljustify the remarks
he had felt it his doty to make, and the views be had
adopted, with reference to the state of the country.
Perhaps he might be told that when that return was laid
before the House it would exhibit a diminution of
crime of late days, perhaps of late weeks. He would
almost say, altheugh the expression might sound Irish,
that he was afraid it would be so. Ile would explain
this very simple. He knew that in one portion of
Ireland there had 'oeen less crime,—less outrage; but
what was the reason? Because these combined law-givers
had it all their own way.—(llcar.) As he had raid before
this combined system of outrage had spread from one
country to another, to a most alarming extent, and
this he believed was solely oe ing to the supine-
ness cf the Government. It was very true that
Tipperary had been in a disturbed state since the
days of Queen Elizabeth, but now portions which had
not before been tainted had become infected. He con-
tended that all this was owing to the insufficient prctec-
tion given by Government. He concluded by moving
for the returns he had referred to.
Earl St. GERMAINE did not rise for the purpose of
opposing the production of the returns which had benc
moved for by the Noble Lord, but merely to state that it
was the intention of her Majesty's Governmen to bring
upon the table a Bill on this subject referred to in
her Majesty's speech. He thought that the Bill would be
found calculated to remedy the evils which the Noble
Marquis had painted so darkly, but not, he (Earl St..
Germains) believed, in more gloomy colours than the
subject deserved. He would merely observe, in refer-
ence to the charge of supineness brought against
the Government that it was no light matter
to set aside the other laws of the land, or to
abridge the liberty of the subject. It was a matter
of deep consideration whether the existing state
of the country justified a measure of this extra-
ordinary nature. Her Majesty's Government had, after
mature deliberation, came to the opinion that the state
of the country did justify the adoption of such a measure,
iu order to repress the actions of those who were opposed
' to all law and order.
Lord FARNHAM must in common justice to her
Majesty's Government, give them credit for having done
all in their power to produce a better state of things in
Ireland.
The Earl of CLARE stated the measures which had
been taken by her Majesty's Government in Ireland had
been attended with the most beneicial results.
Earl
.GREY was glad to find that it was the
intention of her Majesty's Government to bring in a
Bill on this subject. He entirely agreed with
his Noble Friend (the Marquis of Clanricarde)
that some measures should be taken by which security
would be given to life and property in Ireland. This un-
doubtedly was the first step towards improvement in
that country, but he hoped the it Lordsliips' and her Ma-
jesty's Government would not for a moment delude them-
selves with the idea that what they was doing was
all that was necessary for the present state of things.
Any measure that proposed to check insubordination,
while it merely afforded temporary relief, in his opinion,
was not equal to the case. It was not sufficient to meet
to meet the failure of the potato crop, best they
must devi..e measures for the permanent improvement
of' the country. He thought it right that he should
state this. Let them look to the state of Ireland as a
whole. There was something radically wrong in so-
ciety there, else these symptoms would not perpetually
occur. And until both Parliament and the country
looked the real difficulties in the face, and adopted
their measures in a large and comprehensive spirit, not
shrinking from going in opposition to long cherished
prejudices and opinions. Till they did this, they would
not he able effectually to remove the evils of that unfor-
tunate country, It was their duty to propose compre-
hensive measures for the evils of Ireland, so as to ef-
fect their abatement and work out a case. The ques-
tion had long been under the consideration of both
Houses of Parliament, but unfortunately party views had
interfered with its dispassionate consideration, but he
hoped the time had come when they. c ould without re-
ference to party feelings, all agree in the propriety of
investigating into the real causes of this unhappy state
of things and in devising a remedy.--(Hear, hear.) He
thought it right to state. his opinions, as from what fell
from the Noble Lord opposite (the Earl of St. Germans)
the Bill'to be introduced by the Government was to
be Confined to the single object of establishing security
and repressing outrage. He (Earl Grey) considered
that the Government would &Ritz its duty to the House
and the country, if, w bile it proposed rigorous measures,

it did not give a statement of the general policy and the
measures it intended for the permanent improve-
ment of the condition of Ireland. He hoped that
some accounts would be given of the general mea-
sures intended to be proposed at the time when the
Noble Lord introduced the Bill to which he had re-
ferred.
I Their Lordships then adjourned.

namely, a document stating that a quantity of corn bad
been imported which was grown in the province of Can-
ton.—(Hear, hear, and laughter.) He thought the Hon.
Member for Northamptonshire had used an expression
which was too strong to be justified by the circumstances.
He meant the word disgrace.—(Hear, hear.) In his
opinion the volume in question was a most ce
instrueti
one and might be read with advantage by the Ilon-
Member and his friends.—(Hear, hear, and laughter.)
Mr. T. DUNCOMBE regretted that the Hon.
ber for Northamptonshire had not given notice of no
his
question, for now it would go forth to the public, n
only that the calculations were inaccurate, but that
the motive of the compiler were impugned. For it
was insinuated that these papers were prepared /sec"
curately, for with the view of carrying out particulsr
views.--(Cries of " No, no," and " Yes, yes.") takrn
an.. STAFFORD O'BRIEN denied the views
of his expressions, if any such expression fell from
he most heartily retracted it. But when they Prat
• public servants to perform work, they should see
t
the work was properly done.—(Cries of " Order.") in•
ordeirr.._ST(Akla'rF.)OßHDe Ow'aßsßglnEitNe willing, if he
.ohitesvre
not se°,.
to meet the case by motion, but nothing was forth
from his intention than to impute such motives as
Int
been
Mr. to him.--Heer, hear. HORSEMAN) thought that whether the tpfoirt;
mation was correct or not, attacks upon public Se cot
should be Made very guardedly, as they were not pose
to defend themselves.
THETbnC orderO R
ofN theL A CORN-LAWS.—ADJOURNED
day S—
being A D J
reado U RfoNr Er
resit'
rlatthe .
journed debate,
Mr. LIDDELL presented a petition from he shir
owners of the city of London, praying that r Beialrich
wouldl rejectrmesutrNi
tiai,lvzleppdarnrettsyeonoftnetafhnear
petit Ministerialttomnbferro n sm
ue;;;:. 0 r
~„„inetat°'
praying for a total and immediate repeal of for
laws, and that they should be delivered at once
311
ever from that obnoxious impost. tit say
Sir JOHN TROLLOPE presented several P,` ao
in favour of the present corn-laws, and prayinFetfl
confidence should be placed in the present MinleTc'sre'
Petitions were presented in favour of the presen...:4ole
laws by Mr. John Hall, Mr. Blackbirrne, gr. -7,r-kialr
Mr. Greene, and. Sir. John Yarde Buller, from ti*
Pei,
sex, Buckingham, and Devonshire. Mr. Greres:st ;„°
does prayed that the present measure migur„ure
passed until the sense of the cou.utry had been '"
a general election. es iris°
Petitions in favour of the abolition of the - rcieeesa
were presented by Mr. Townsend, one of which icits;igaw.,
by upwards of 12,000 persons ; by Mr. D 001194010,
by 3,000 inhabitants of Dundee, who were, O. toot'
with the linen trade, and who felt that ther 11) corn
were
se
; seriouslyan d b y Mr.affected
,r :s.b
ut the
npresent state of
f
An HoN. ISIEMBER presented a petition in Ala
the Government measure, very respectablY
inerously signed. .
Mr. HINDLEY presented a similar petition,
the
from
Mr. 2,200 of the inhabitants of Pontefract.
Mr. BRIGHT presented a similar petit' frn,
n
o
bJ
mayor and corporation of the city of Durham' ;Adof
An How. Memetna presented a petition, As,'7oar
2,200 of the inhabitants of Derbyshire in 1"6
protection.
Mr. ESCOTT presented a petition nuineron
st
ftritoimonabtaodwbneeinn
pSroemseenrtseedtsbbyirteb,ecAomplaining tii,rotereo(
Society which did not represgenritculttlr
the inhabitants, and praying for a total an '-
abolition of the duties on foreign corn. cara-r tbe
Mr. GIBSON presented a petition frem of.,s
in favour of a total and immediate rePe'operou,of
corn-laws ; also a petition from tbe..,,„lllo'ef
of Manchester engaged in the Irish trade, enP"r
the falling off of orders in their trade in conseitisjuiv
the failure of the potato crop, and praying heir pr j'
Government to adopt such measures as mat -ti .dge
people of Ireland with food. did,
people
Mr. THORNELY presented a petition fr°.,,,ti'V
north, approving of the policy of her St lie
v
vernment, but praying that the abolition o.e" ,)1
on foreign corn should be total and iminednni
Mr. COLQUHOUN then rose and s°llooolo
wished to make some explanation to th° the ;;00'
some observations which had fallen fre„rtisetrobe,
Honourable Baronet at the head of her ,'"'„esst c'tse'
vernment. It might be in the recoltechsa s'eP6
House that the Honourable Baronet id ofil3otle
that he (Mr. Colquhoun) had once he Ilerl°°loljl
similar to those entertained by the s des,
Member for Wolverhampton, namely, cl'sll'
repeal of the corn-laws, and that he had st ife oto
them for the principles of high protection.o,
assure the Right Hon. Baronet he was naistaheate.lote't
the opinions he then held and thoSe he 10.7/0.0, Ye,sie‘'
With regard to his former opinions, thens,itier,
would think him very inconsistent. of c°,ss4,S.°
to be one of very great importance, and on be tsv-e,,
able difficulty and anxiety. He must not es Be.;
arrive at his present convictions per salt0:00
given the question his most serious evierlirjoss
for many years. He was excluded fr°133,1,04f0r
in 1841, at which time the question of 'tio I tie'
assumed au aspect of the most pareui°,o tb,erstil,;
ante, and during that period he had gi/;asieeeo",/
tion the deepest and the most anxious c",,,,e0:1401,'
and he felt it his duty to adhere to the ef.,„-
had come to. The Hon. Baronet had re;) ore li"'
in 1841 he bad found his (Mr. Colquh0013;)"el voles
that of the Member for Wolvrrhampton ss,'"ivero;k sl`'he
Baronet remember that the Member for'vv.°
moved for a Committee in order to ;Veep.7o.
all those persons Is ho were not of his oPliattielloetr,
debate on the subject, in 1838, he receteteetljell°lll6
the Hon. Member for Sheffield. A siletr the 0,00
one made in 1838 was made in 1839 'la th.efoseut
able Member for Wolverhampton , 100 ,511,70 S
of the Honourable Member for Isolln°" se W'islS)l
that division. They also knew that tbedisal'tsl,os
man more strict in his political principleetaisi leh>l*,v
Member. The Hon. Member for Cante,sr"olsofrh&
the Member for Wolverlaarepton, as Candid coleier
ber for Portsmouth. by should be (trAr.obrriseh :14
remarked as having agreed with the ''essr ti!e
vcrbampton? He had found an old Prirlis cot'
tamed some of his opinions, es given to wog 0,0 01
at Kilmarnock, but in such a ease, ro° it,sislee
constituency was of a liberal fee`liVs 17411;i1
policy to exhibit as liberal opinions , oviS `'o )0
long as they did not clash with 1113bottfisir6rei
When he (Mr. Colquhoun) was on the bee, ecett9ll::
his constituents put the question to ioi°3„feci fh,;
prepared to vote for a total an sate'ti,o4 ;;
peal of the corn-laws ? " Ed title
he was favourable •
to a low I's "at Propilros'
was still his opinion. He "' I,lOO°lllOY r;
disturb the interests of the agriculture' .t, of folltreo,,
thought protection was the best intere:biel),,or,•
and he was favourable to any weasel.% see „'isel"
hold that protection without injerf,,t"„st c°,'" the,ol,l;
classes. He believed that they coin° lie'reofek,
tection in this country unless theYsietg:es if;ll'
port of the mercantile and manufactt:r!r:;slose 6A;
country. He found that many of til'",,-ose ti!iser),s Vie.
favour of a low fixed duty on corn Ache;7f
now found they had chan,ged their Pt..;
t of
terially on that question. As the fist se st t r°
so favourable to the mercantile intere,ssieg „
turing interest, it was not surl3` ,
should have changed their oeini°l;fittlril' t
rolloeco
opinion that the views of 10 orrlt'svoolc"ftroe
sound, and such as ought to he the' 5 pure'
views of Mr. Huskisson were th3tostiOrpotiol
de
was bound to relax commercial re: of cc", irsilo
Possible, consistently with the safet.l ish beg the
he
tnerce, in every possible mode in extesetico.lo
r.
move commercial restrictions end oat csft,'s
of the country.—(Hear, bear.) 0,0(.3 sake
most desirable, and should he scrf. yet e
maintained that such a course hed dF`t ishese °I)Je
ceived his most cordial support. f3t/referr,osoool4o
Lord the Member for London tle' tt
speech, to the authority of ilirilightote9'
expressed a marvel that the bad di Alt
Baronet at the head of the Min •1 1(10'1004'
an authority, he (Mr. Colquhoun) 104issossolly
Noble Lord, and maintain that thenCsht up 1,0',1,0
attempted, would have failed the Ad ;00'3 6,00
on the occasion.—(Hear.) There htl.,,e, 0..04 jiif'co'
of laying on heavy and proteenivisg;oll 0006
duties ; and Mr. Huskisson, Percesalcl Led tine le
of manufacture there were which c.,;oololl;sesc,,ete il°
with them, and which were more ' pot 514,0 if
sisted by such, withdrew from thelnjel ~,s1 vole I.
enjoyed. He (Mr. Colquono It; se pe'
maintain that bad Mr. Ilusl"s" „ctor
present moment he would ..chav„,ceer f`i) '10:1
system. The Noble Lord the oleFooser.:hys,atiedero
exception to an argument put seed "„. 10',01firs
Member for Northampton, son 7-,,,csari°4l. /1" o°l',
tection be removed from man" -be Isle' 'oile, o'ol
1 T not Of) AA"
allowed to remain on the sot was eV
Adam Smith, to the effect that it
and pollaitiOdsc JO"
of a state, but was also wi,cotoo°,o vfe)
should impose duties on foreign their °, sceeeel,
to the taxes which they laid n_. coo ,t,11)_:,
How did that apply in the Pro; is on° licso,lll.,
enormous taxation resting on ", debt' pee, oat,
because it arose from the nati°Delsis pr° tsres 00 1,
ra 1 50 0
the habit of putting a duty on f°vre ,700nnco' nett' tee
quate equivalent ; then why ic fled e u et seeit'f,
category ? why, but because itotio look
quate protection. No Inani.,.cre Witnsares, eoss
Staffsrelsbire or Lanes sn% that 1i! tPto
amount of mineral, in rot
24,°„sed5rerceos,O,
advantage over all s was e are
Agriculture in this countrY 03,bile AOO sit,
e s
more capricious, more varie.bsteiaroPe!og..
that of any other country
ilucorresioeted hots, caul'
factures of the country a
ha Baronet reg ena eit'iritr
But the Right Honourable ,_rce is)ot
the experience of the last tn.rievitar- in t•co.
the: apprehensions of the Itisokee prlO,l3OA
that the reduction which hau_atics,i I! silt 11005e,11,,
tion of foreign cattle had Piv The
rket.
than depressed the Ins- .4 ovitiVell „wilt riCs ,
however, did not fee that the urge
_Leese'
sope
self, for in another part octbelslpisos 011)cl:1'p 131001(isicolfit;
change was necessary tight flop() load 00 otov
is this country. The ,(is the eces
however, wrong in suPPTis asiff cn.,:t's t° f‘,
high prices, for, when tee. dead
sion got abroad that they r,`,,rt; i's
es
with oxen from all parts . I ,s tbun
quence was the market was
,:i.ter,,ss ovoi one
tt to,
duce; (Bear, rriceona
,11.1 sift:ilato/
which had produced thessaetinsgctiopliaronet t
_the year of Viers°, add
,etbe,sit
he could refer
witlionourable 011°,011 tr.). 1/
limited ::111(31pli;
raving the Right
stinselatiebbi, cot' Deti
cause bad the effect or
es__,,„ t /oaf,
.Aopiter:ol
bled the labouring class,,„
nda,,,'",oo:ipt
butcher e dree ses
mend more unit tho vd
PT
• elis coital/ en ;0g
person could ge epende arltl'A' it °
railways to
A , ended
a of lileYr
legieletrOlkni lbes oysteDl
capitol', WA 011