The Sun.
London, England, 1848-02-04 00:00:00

For albs. to sink the offal.

s. d. to C. d. a. d. to s. d.
Inferior Beasts 8 4 8 it Second quality ditto BIS 4 4
second quality -• • • 310 4 0 Coarse-woolled ditto 4 6 4 8
Prime large Oxen— 4 2 4 4 Southdown Nether 410 5 0
Primo Soots
Large coarse Calves 4 2 410 Large Hogs •. .• 4 0 4
Prime small ditto
Stickling Calves —25 I 27 I Quarter old Pigs •• 18 I 24
Inferior Sheep • • . 3 4 8 8 Lambs ..... • 0 9 • •
SUPPLY AT MARKET.
I Sheep. I Calves. I Pigs.
1,880 102 231
DTEWGATE 21:37D LEADEN/1113M.
We had a slow trade, this morning, yet prices were
generally supported.

Beasts.
821

At per etoste by the Carcase.

s. d. to s• •i d ___
1. d. to s, d.
lieet,inferior.. —• • 3 2 3 4 Mutton, inferior •• 3 4 8 6
middling .... 3 6 3 8 middling.. 3 8 4 I
priraelarge .. 310 4 0 prime .... 4 2 4 4
prime small .• 4 8 4 2 Perk, 1arge........ 3 8 4 0
Teal ••••••..• • • • • . 4 2 i ll 5ma11........ 4 3 It 2

. - -
Lamb. Os Od to Sa Sd.
33OROVVII HOP MARKET.
Although our market is by no means brisk, last
week's prices are well supported in every instance. The
supply of Hops on offer is good, but the stocks in dealers'
hands are very small. New Hops—Sussex pockets,
21 15s t• 21 6s; Weald of Kent ditto, 31 to 31 10s;
Mid and East Kent ditto, 3l 6s to 6/ 12s per ewt.

PARLIAMENTARY BUSINESS.
From the Votes and Proceedings of the House of Commons,
TFiU ESDAY, FEL 3.

The following petitions Railways were presented,
and the Bills ordered to be brought in:—
London and Enniskillen (Relinquishment of Line be-
tween Omagh and Enniskillen, &c.)
London and Coleraine (Deviation of Line, and Amend-
ment of Act).
London and Blackwall Connecting Branch, &c.
London and Blackwall Improvement and Branches to
the St. Katharine's and London Docks.
London and North-Western (Branches and Extensions
from Leamington, &c.)
Exeter, Yeovil, and Dorchester Railway and Branches.
Aberdare Railway Act Amendment (Lease of Line and
Works to the Taff Vale Railway Company).
Manchester, Sheffield, and Lincolnshire (Station at
Sheffield-and Branch to the Sheffield Canal).
East Lincolnshire (Alteration of Great Grimsby Branch).
Great Northern (Isle of Aiholnie Extension).
London, Brighton, and South Coast (Extension of time
in respect of Littlehathpton and Steyning Branches,
&c.)
Manchester, Buxton, Matlock, and Midlands Junction
Deviation and Branches.
Midland (Gloucester and Stonehenge Junction).
Whitehayen Junction.

Whitehaven Junction (Extension, Alteration, and
Branches, &c.)
Whitehaven and Furness Junction (Extension or Devi-
ation Line from Silecroft to Foxfield, &c.)
York, Newcastle and Berwick (Deviation and abandon-
ment of part of the Thirsk and Mahon Branch).
London and South. Western Railway Company's Acts
Amendment, Extension, Deviation, and New Works.
Windsor, Staibes, and South-Western Railway Act (No.
1), 1147 (Slough Extension and Devia.tior.s, No. 2).
London and South-Western Railway Company and
Southampton and Dorchester Railway Company
Amalgamation.
Exeter and Cowley Bridge Junction.
London and South-Western, Exeter and Crediton, Taw
Vale Railway and Dock, and Bodmin and Wadebridge
Railway Companies' Arrangements.
London, Brighton, and South Coast (London-bridge and
New Cross Stations, &c.)
Bristol and Exeter (Taunton and Castle Cary Branch).
Bristol and Exeter (Branch from Bleadon to Wells,
Glastonbury, and Street).
Direct London and Portsmouth.
Fleetwood, Preston, and West Riding Junction (Burnley
and Colliery Branches).

TO THE EDITOR OF THE SUN.
Si ,—ln the month of November last there ap-
peared in your paper a report of an application to the
Court of Queen's Bench, by Mr. Whateley, Q.C.,
headed—" Misconduct of a Staffordshire Attorney."
The report was (though I have no doubt unin-
tentionally so) incorrect; and although no name
was mentioned, the circumstances were so well known
in this neighbourhood, that there was no difficulty in
identifying me with the transaction.
The matter was fully argued, on the 29th instant,
before Mr. Justice Erle, by Mr. Sergeant Talfourd
and Mr. Whitmore on my behalf, and Mr. Whateley
and Mr. Grey for Mr. Clementson, on whose behalf
the rule was obtained. The Judge took home the
affidavits, and promised his judgment on the 31st,
when he discharged the rule, with all costs, and
stated " that he saw no intentional concealments in
the case, and no misappropriation of client's money."
I have not seen any report of this case in your
paper; and, as it was a question of character, and as
I have suffered much from the effects of the applica-
tion alone, and more from the many garbled and false
statements affecting my conduct in the transactions,
I trust that you will do me the justice to obtain from
your reporter the argument and decision, and to give,
at all events, the effect of the latter, in your earliest
publication.—l am, Sir, yours, respectfully,
SAMUEL ARNOT, Solicitor.
Hanley, Staffordshire, Feb. 2, 1848.