The Sun.
London, England, 1846-06-26 00:00:00

which they denounce as being neither more nor less than
disguised emancipation. . . . .

The Duke and Duchess DE NEWURS, with their
children, passed through Angoul6me on Saturday. They
slept on Friday night at Rntl'ec, where they were com-
pelled to stop on account of au accident to one of the
wheels of their carriage.
PARIS BoUllsE.—Five per Cents., cash, 120 f. 60c.,
for account, 120 f. 40c. ; Three per Cents., cash, 82f. 90e.
Railway shares improved:—For cash, Orleans, 1,242 f.
50e.; Rouen, 1,0061.; Havre, 725 f.; Northern, 7231. 50c.;
Bordeaux, 5951.
BUSINESS DONE IN FOEIGN_RAILWAYS. AT THE

LONDON STOCK EXCHANGE, JUNE 25.
Ceylon, lA—Demerara, 25,6 Dendre Valley, )4 —Dutch Rhenish,
74—Louvain and Jemappe, 4—Luxembourg, l Ti --Madrid and Va-
lentia, 1 !,6 —Namur and Liege, 2—Northern of France Constituted,
13%—Paris and Lyons Constituted, 5% —Paris and Rouen, 38 34
Paris and Strasbourg Constituted, OA —Rouen and "lane, 28 gi
West Flanders, 3%.

We have seen a manifesto published by Don Antonio
de Hare y Tamariz, Minister of Finance to the Presi-
dent Santa Anna, who at present is residing in this me-
tropolis. In this he attacks with much violence the
project of establishing a monarchy in Mexico. The
reasons which ho adduces are of sufficient weight to
neutralise those which have been offered in favour of
the scheme, through the medium of various continental
journals. Don Ilaro has treated the question in such a
lucid manner as to leave no doubt that the prc;ject is
completely visionary, and that, even in the event of its
being realised, it would be without permanent duration.
He shows that at whatever time the plan of monarchy
might be brought forward, it would cause much blood-
shed, but that it would at no time be so impolitic as at
present, when the United States would take the advan-
tage of the political divisions caused by the movement
to pursue their scheme of usurpation. The style of the
manifesto is forcible, and full of that fire which distin-
guishes an uncompromising Republican, and although
it seems to have been published chiefly for the purpose
of explaining the conduct of its author during the
progress of recent events, he has availed himself of the
opportunity to attack triumphantly all those Europeans
who have tried to revive the treaty of Ygualo, which, as
is well known, fell still-born. Don Haro, who belongs
to the first noble families in Mexico, and who has
consistently adhered to his republican sentiments, being
unwilling to join in the plan for establishinga monarchy,
is now a voluntary exile from his country. Some of his
friends have accompanied him to Europe, and if any
opinion may be formed on the matter, we may presume
that Don Hare being such a thorough republican,
would not be so intimate with Santa Anna, did not the
ex-president, and some of the other Mexican nobles
now in Europe, entertain similar sentiments. If Don
Haro does not gain his object by the publication of his
manifesto, ho will at least enjoy the satisfaction of
having attacked his political adversaries, and of having
shown that his conduct has been regulated by a sincere
love for his country, inasmuch as ho has preferred a pri-
vate loss to the ruin of Mexico.

KING'S COLLEGE HOSPITAL.—This excellent institu-
tion has in the last six years afforded relief to the sick poor
inhabiting the densely-populated neighbourhoods of Lincoln's
Inn•fields and Clare-market. The number of beds in the
►resent building, which was not designed for a hospital,
is only 120, so that the in-patients mu.it be limited
to that number. The number of out-patients has
increased from 4,056, the number relieved in 1840, the
year in which the hospital was opened, to 15,935, the num-
ber relieved in 1845 ; and there is every reason to believe
that a similar increase would have taken place in the number
of in-patients but for the inadequate accommodation
provided. An attempt will be made to-morrow
to increase the efficiency of this excellent institution
by enabling it to afford to the poor more ample means of
medical and surgical relief. A meeting is to be held, at three
o'clock, in the new hall of King's College, in aid of a fund
for enlarging King's College Hospital, so as to extend
its usefulness. Over this meeting the Archbishop
of Canterbury has consented to preside. The Duke of Cam-
bridge will, it is understood, be present, and the meet-
ing will be addressed by the Bishops of London
and Oxford, the Lord Ashley, the Vice-Chancellor
of England, the Vice-Chancellor Knight Bruce, Arch-
deacon Manning, and other distinguished persons.
With such advocacy there can be no doubt but that the good
work will prosper.

QUEEN'S BENCH —(THIS DAY.)
(Sittings at Nisi Prins.)
GURNEY TIIE ELDER V. GURNEY AND ANOTHER.
This was an action brought by Mr. Gurney, a gentleman
who formerly held an office in this Court, to recover 9001.
on a bill of exchange from the firm of Gurney and Chapman,
late of the Union Brewery, Lambeth. The circumstances
which led to the action are shortly these : —One
of the defendants is the son of the plaintiff.
and the latter, it would appear, gave his son a
sum of 8,0001., to purchase a share of Mr. Chapman,
the other defenant, in the Union Brewery. A partnership
was in consequence formed, during the existence of which
the younger Gurney gave several bills of exchange and pro-
missory notes, in the name of " Gurney and C 0.," to his
father and other members of the family. In course of time
the affairs of the brewery became embarrassed. and Mr.
Chapman caused an inquiry to be instituted, which led to a
dissolution of the partnership. The younger Gurney, in con-
sequence of the proceedings in which he had been engaged,
becamu banl,ittpL, and tl,e nfraira of Mr. Chapman were
also placed in a state of serious embarrasment. The elder
Gurney sued his son in legal form on the bill of exchange,
and the latter allowed judgment to go by default. That
circumstance induced the plaintiff to bring this further
action, to decide whether the giving of the bill of exchange
was an act of partnership, or whether it was only a private
transaction of the younger Gurney. In fact the material
point at issue was the responsibility of Mr. Chapman, as
being the partner of the younger Mr. Gurney.
A special jury was impannelled to try the case.
The Attorney-General and Mr. Montague Chambers ap-
peared for the plaintiff, and Mr. Watson and Mr. Humphries
for the defendants.
The examination of witnesses on the point we have stated
was then proceeded with.
The case was not expected to close before the rising of the
Court.