The Sun.
London, England, 1846-01-12 00:00:00

TALLOW

This market is very firm, and the tendency of Pric7 1 to
upwards. On the spot there is no fine Y.C. under 433 d
sto
43s 6d, nor for all the month at 435. For February .00
March the quotation is 43s 6d, but there are no sellers.
Tallow, 435.

CHANCERY.—(THIS DAY.)
This was the first day of Hilary Term, but it
unattended with the usual cer,?monials, in consequ,.„elld
of the arrang(ments that have been made by the leit
Chancellor and the other Judges, for the more quo
disposal of the business of the Courts. The only ter • l
that will in future be attended with any state ceren3°lliti
are Michaelmas and Easter.
The Lord Chancellor took his seat in his Court to
Westminster to-day at eleven o'clock, and proceeded
hear appeal motions.

WHITEHEAD V. BENNETT.—NE EXEAT REGN°' foo
This case came before his Lordship in the nature t/iiot
appeal motion from the decision of the Vice-Chance,';,h
of England, discharging a writ of ne exeat regno
td
lie had previously granted. The case was part-lef'nts
before his Lordsiiip during the recess, and the argioe-
weie resumed and concluded to-day. 04
His LORDSHIP, considering the original affidaVitg oft
which the application for the writ was made insuffieled
affirmed the decision of the Court below, and order
the writ to be discharged with costs. of
Whr the en . - before the T. .Chancellor

den the case was . ice- lam. ~./,
England, we gave an outline of it, and, it is uunecessi"
therefore, to state the facts again.

NEEDHAM V. NEEDHAM.
039
The remainder of the morning was occupied wit
further hearing of this par:•heard motion.

ROLLS' COURT.-(THIS DAY')
Lord LANGDALE sat this day at Westminster.
HOPE V. HOPE. „ a rot
Mr. Ilocuas, on the part of the plaintiff, apPoe, the
an order for the postponement for four months e its
hearing of this case, which was fixed to take Plt/c
theN Court of Queen's Bench this term. Oa eis
o opposition being offered by the defendant's CO
the motion was granted.

DAVIDSON V. LESLIE. •if for
Mr. KINDERSLEY applied on behalf of the plaintl- be
leave to amend his bill, and for an order to restrailitlier
defendant's agents and solicitor from proceeding fur,,,is
in this case, until the prcduction in Court of certigti
papers necessary to the establishment of the platob
claim to large property in land and flocks in New '1;10
Wales. He also applied for an injunction to re9t„sil
the defendant from giving any notice of action a-
after such papers, accounts, &c., should be produced'
The application was granted. fter
Several similar motions were then disposed 0900'
which his Lordship proceeded with the hearing °` tip%
opposed petitions, which were of quite an uninteres
character.

VICE-CHANCERY.—(THIS DA-1(31
(Before the VICE-CHANCELLOR of ENGLAND.) „.001.
His Honour sat to day at ten o'clock, and took 10:05
No motion of any interest came before the Court pre—
to our going to press.
(Before Vice •Chancellor KNIGHT BRUCE.)
TURNER V. FRA.MPTON. •tielrt
This suit, which stood in his Honour's paper foriiii
rent, arose out of the residuary clause of the w-ceils
Mrs. Fanning, deceased—a case not affected by
-the reiii
Will Act. The clause to be construed was the tale°
ing :—" All the residue of my . money, stock, a„11"
moneys, I give and devise to m son, David xerot,.ooot
and to my daughter, Harriet Penning, in equal Pc'tbet
if they are alive at my decease ; but in case one or 0
of them be deceased before then, to the survivor. ~ tbBl
His HONOUR, in giving judgment, seemed to OM,
tl
the construction of the clause was chiefly affected "fiore
meaning and effect to be given to the word " surf; toe_./
which is sometimes used in its own proper sense---°0 47'
times in the sense of other." David Penning,' °Lb off
the legatees, deceased without issue prior to the del'io. 0
the testator. His Honour gave his decision in fav° tole
Harriet Penning, the surviving legatee, at the 6°ll'lol
said that the suit very properly had been instituteout o
gave both the plaintiff and the trusttes their costs
the estates.
QUEEN'S BENCH.—(THIS -n
AB
(Sittings in Banco, at Wesminster
This morning, shortly after ten o'clock, Lord '-',;(1
Mr. Justice Pa tteson, Mr. Justice Coleridge, ft"
,t
Jasticc Lodi thiur seats us this Coat
forthwith proceeded to business.
(New Trial Paper.)
GALE V. LEWIS. tiv beg/
This was a case which had already been patntod
It was an application for a now trial the oe"