The Sun.
London, England, 1846-02-04 00:00:00

MONDAY, FEB. 2.

Airdrie and Bathgate Junction Railway—Committee on Petition,
Tuesday, Feb. 10.

Leeds and York Railway—Committee on Petition, Tuesday, Feb. 10.
Leicester and Tamworth Railway—Committee on Petition, Tues-
day, Feb. 10.

Coventry, Nuneaton, Birmingham, and Leicester Railway—Com-
mittee on Petition, Tuesday, Feb. 10.
Glasgow, Paisley, Kilmarnock, and Ayr Railway and Branches
(No. 6)—Committee on Petition, postponed from Wednesday 4 till
Thursday, Feb. 5.
Glasgow, Paisley, Kilmarnock, and Ayr Railway and Branches
(No. s)—Committee on Petition, postponed from Wednesday 4 till
Thursday, Feb. 5.
Cork, Blackrock, and Passage Railway—Committee on Petition,
Friday, Feb. 13.
Exeter, Topsham, and Exmouth Railway—Committee on Petition,
Tuesday, Feb. 10.
North-Western Railway—Committee on Petition, Tuesday, Feb. 10.
East and West Yorkshire Junction Railway—Committee on Peti-
tion, Tuesday, Feb. 10.
Guildford, Chichester, Portsmouth, and Fareham Railway—Com-
mittee on Petition, postponed from Wednesday 4 till Thursday, Feb. 5.
London and South-Western Railway (Salisbury Junctioh)—Com-
mittee on Petition, postponed from Wednesday 4 till Thursday, Feb. 5.
London and South-Western Railway (Basingstoke and Salisbury
Extension)—Committee on Petition, postponed from Wednesday 4
till Thursday, Feb. 5.
Guildford, Chichester, and Portsmouth Railway—Committee on
Petition, postponed from Wednesday 4 till Thursday, Feb. 5.
Lancashire and Yorkshire North-Eastern Railway—Committee on
Petition, Tuesday, Feb. 10. _ . .

London and &ford Railway—Committee on Petition, Tuesday,
Feb. 10.

LAW INTELLIGENCE.'

VICE-CHANCELLOR'S COURT, Feb. 3.
(Before the VICE-CHANCELLOR of ENGLAND.)
TUE DAILY NEWS.—BRADBURY V. MARRIOTT.

Mr. BETHELL, upon his Honour taking his seat this morn-
ing, renewed his application for leave to give notice of a
motion for to-morrow, for an injunction to restrain the de-
fendant from publishing a daily newspaper, under the title of
the Daily News, the name of the new morning journal, pub-
lished since the opening of Parliament by the plaintiff. In
consequence of the leave given by the Court on the 26th of
the last month, notice had been given of the intention of the
plaintiffs to move for the injunction. Upon receiving that
notice the defendant appeared to express his repentance of
what he had done; but since then he had issued handbills,
announcing his intention to publish a paper, to be called the
Daily News, at 2id., and it therefore became necessary to
apply for the injunction.
His HONOUR gave leave for the Learned Counsel to apply
for the injunction to-morrow.

THE CORPORATION OF LOUTH V. THE WARDENS OF THE
GRAMMAR SCHOOL OF LOUTH.
The further arguments in this part-heard cave occupied the
Court the remainder of the day.

COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH, Feb. 3.

(Sittings at Nisi Prius, Westminster Hall, before Mr. Justice
WIGHTMAX and a Common Jury.)
KILBY V. ELCOMB.

In this case it appeared that the plaintiff was a dancing-
master, who sought to recover damages from the defandant,
by reason of the injury he sustained from the bite of a dog
kept by the defendant, which was in the habit of snapping
and biting at passers-by.
The charge not having appeared to be proved to the satis-
faction of the jury, a verdict was returned for the defendant.
The next case was one involving a charge against tie
Alsia steamer, trading between London and Yarmo:„„n, for
negligent navigation, by which a coal barge w: sunk, and
her cargo, value 301., was lost, to which T;413 added the loss
of the vessel, 301. more.

Several witnesses were exanllnta to prove the fact, and
amount of injury sustained ioy the owners of the barge; and
witnesses for the defence were under examination when our
report left.