The Sun.
London, England, 1846-09-18 00:00:00

CITY REGISTRATION.

(THIS DAY.)
Kythis morning, at ten o'clock, Mr. Arnold resumed
e revision of the freemens' list in the Court of Com-
ee,„lll)leas, Guildhall, beginnining with the Innholders'
I„`"Panv
4i7r. Samuel Brown, the Conservative agent, withdrew
The name of Mr. Ridley, residing at Oswell, in Sus-
sett; as struck off the list, although the claimant
Tliti'Y carries on business in the City.
btu.° Learned Barrister next took' the list of the
Pub,le_,ittris Company, from which three names were ex-
keg. the claimants not attending to answer the ob-
with,e Needlemakers Company was next proceeded
itkt but the cases of objection which were raised pre-
ktr,a(l„ lambing of importance. Some names (on Con-
to Cre objections) were expunged, no one appearing
kt end their retention on the list.
"AAR v LEBONE REGISTRATION.

I.h (THIS DAY.)
aci,„,e revision of the list of voters for the Borough of

)to)t?ltrt no commenced this morning, at the Borough
triste'ruse, Marylebone-lane, before the Revising
t ' D. C. Moylan, Esq.
(msereatiee claims and objections were supported
ZkesenGreenwood, while the Free-trade party were
I,tepre,, ted by Mr. Ivemy—we regret we can only say
r„Ntiocehted," for out of the number of claims and oh-
e made in the several districts below detailed, not
"t itclttlated from the Liberals, all having been either
ch. h b
1,:4 the Tories, or made by the overseers, on
°rparo-
r6pther technical grounds.
"ktio;st-ollowing is a summary of the claims and ob-
litt' as put in by the Tory party:—
2lebone parish Objections 609; Claims 27
I,4?:!sncras Objections 526; Claims 8
tl4,ltin,„ utogton -
10'4 au.e,ll: total of objections lodged by the Conserve-
tt,i'Lost the Liberal voters, of 1,216 ; and 39 claims
~Tterlosertion of Conservative voters on the registry.
Osee were a number of claims lodged by the several
trbeers„ but as a matter of course, they bore no re-
tr:tYlei° the politics of the parties objected to. In
2tinteTle and Paddington parishes those claims
(1411,1` to, 37, with no objections, and in St. Pancras
the /14, with 2 objections.
t 4„, and .crisussa BA.ItRISTER takincr his seat on the
olpe(lol:tii4vetdOh d,oilisrtes,viohues to the overseers landing in their
stated that it was his intention to
urt by adjournment at the Vestry-room,
for the revision of the lists for St. Pan-
Zonti slor.day next, at eleven o'clock.
bz,it wits :"Al lists had been handed in, in the usual
t:J aiolols parirsZl that the objections to the list of
'lWood amounting to 120, should be taken
°t which, with the exception of eight, Mr.
O, ablish on the part of the Conservatives, succeeded
iected mg. None of the parties whose names were
Ltll „ to appeared in support of their claims, a thus
''N'evision of the first list tali en this day, thenegis-
-ot,e by the names of 112 Liberals.
tift slightest point of importance, either legally or
liter of general interest, arose during the revision
t 3 Ist, whi h occupied the court up to the time of our
tft c
- press.

tr.,
l'if `sONDARIES'.—(THIS DAY.)
44
d01,,,4 Court did not sit to-day, no causes having been
11 for trial.

BANKRUPTCY.-(THIS DAY.)
(Before Mr. Commissioner SHEPHERD.)
\A"1441( IN RE HARE.
rupt in this case had carried on business as
I;qthi.‘"-Per, in New-street, Dorset-square, and came
r,"_ certificate.
Zttli,'''eeke appeared on behalf of the assignees, to urge
qta4tase should be adjourned, under the following
aces :—lt appears that he was indebted to
optrcitlitors in the sum of 2,2081., but the whole of
14;13 brtY,had been swept away under an assignment
t4lll 4°,stn, er. The bankrupt left London in March
'Y to pv'ea of extreme alth, and said he was
Vt of • aris, which, however, he did not, but left a
",taY 04 ,4ttorney with a person named Snellgarde, to
48tue business, and the latter had applied some
kt,ktoneta, and the brther had sold off everything.
floci :was brought too try the validity of the assign-
-1,13,8 still pending.
,111 h
°LecAs• for the bankrupt, submitted that he ought
eid responsible for the conduct of Snellgarde.
COMMISSIONER said the person holding
14Val °I atturney could only legally do what his
,l,encld do.
1-t ucA
,Ikey continued—That the bankrupt had been
dieprecarious state, and his friends, thinking, he
Ailtit)llLinsisted on his seeing them secured ; hut at
leteage thought himself solvent.
led COMMISSIONER said that, unless it could
L,.1114,: there was a very great degree of ignorance,
‘aNkr,"l3t Was the person in the wrong; he had given
itt-8.-etnt, intending it to be acted on. He did not
tli'foi,lciejeditor who held the assignment acted wrong,
pie ne say now that there was fraud on the part
atkr y
t 1113 t, but there were good grounds for ac-
t, t °Mr. Co ke's application.
eertifi ° •
Deal cate was then adjourned till the sittings
ti terra.
LACE
COURT.-(THIS DAY.)

(Before Mr. CORRIE.)
irtNG GLEN V. ROGERS.
Y.C), ILLS of ExcHANGE.—This was an action
1.1,11er the sum of 411. 3s. 3d. on a bill of exchange
11., and ss. for noting, and 3s. for interest.
kt *4, °elm, for the plaintiff, said it would only be
kle to put in the bill and note to entitle the plain-
-4t Ge
1/411. 'ti
ii4r,,44" d.rnede JUDGE said the charge for noting could
,koilfebt/ ,e kt said that he should be able to prove that
ti,-ant had promised to pay that amount in con-
cgtt,, that time was given, and therefore it could be
1); te-under the account stated.
,44(1
2ned JUDGE said it was
a special contract, and
1,,Z Much better not to take it.
o\ttl said he must press his right to it. It was '
Eta the superior courts.
i ri h.lib all
JUDGE said that this was new in prac-
ttit, and he did not see the justice of. allowing it.
tte, axpense incurred for the plaintiff's own ad-
1%0
LA -E said the bankers had noted it for greater
,t 4 IHess * Was then called, and proved the promise
fik 11];
44'111:4*0 %Nedsaid he would leave the case to
it „ b JUDGE
Ilke. tit rott,t tell them that, in his opinion, there
64:!thill'el contract. The jury would,. however, say
Jtin, Y considered he was entitled.
, 4111 J, after about five minutes, gave a verdict for
rib mount_
41.

0/. c.tx,
SESSIONS.—(T HIS DAY.)
1,1111 .t/44 reen, Mary Hollands, Jane Biggs, Maria
Ovip Johnson, and Ellen Sullivan, wereindicted
unlawfully committed a riot and breach of
Silllitt444lASt. John's workhouse, Southwark.
`‘rmitage, porter to the above workhouse,
;tet,,11,41„:311 the evening of the 19th of August, the
tt'' it 4-trd wan in a complete state of rebellion. Ifu
IlyAti4 the time, and found the prisoners foremost
‘4,43,d the disturbance. On remonstrating with
eued his interference, and used such disgust-
tli,ten,ing language that he was compelled to
Vittle- Police and give the prisoners into custody.
to further added, that the prisoners were
aepGpiahhe inmates of the house, and had frequently
04'‘'1441:;Istil;' for their misbehaviour. They were in-
house, and had on many occasions bllikiktulations by the guardians, but owing to their
prisllduct had been discharged.
the sera behaved in a very indecorous manner
'444 111.44Tlicil, and denied the whole of the evidence
C4°4l'llllst them.
RRAII asked whether they had been eon.
141 Y previous occaeion ?—Witness replied

in the affirmative. They had been several times sum-
marily convicted at the Southwark Police-court. The
Magistrate, on that account, committed them for trial,
believing that the punishment they would receive would
prevent such disorder occurring again in tho workhouse.
The jury, after a few minutes' consultation, Acquitted
the prisoner, but recommended some attention in the
mode of admitting raupers into the workhouse. Such
women as the prisoner, they considered, ought to be re-
fused admission, which would be the only means of pre-
venting the recurrence of such disorders. The pri-
soners, who had suffered nearly a month's imprison-
ment, were then discharged.

GUILDHALL.—(THIS DAY.)
Jinxes Ring, the man who was charged on Tuesday
last with having at tempted to commit suicide, by hanging
himself, was brought up again this day, and, on his ex-
pressing contrition for his folly and rashness, he was
discharged.
Mr. Cook, a farmer and grazier, being also a cattle
sale.man in Loudon, preferred a complaint against Mr.
Smith, a brother salesman, for using abusive and threat-
ening language in Smithfield market.
The complainant stated that he considered himself in
danger from the violence of the defendant.
In the course of the inquiry it appeared that the
whole matter, which had at length assumed a serious
character, arose out of some very trivial illustrations of
the adage, that " two of a trade cannot agree." After a
good deal of wrangling between the solicitors, Mr.
Sidney Smith, for the complainant, and Mr. Hobler, for
the defendant, Mr. Alderman Hunter bound over the
parties to keep the peace towards each other.