The Sun.
London, England, 1848-06-30 00:00:00

ing that protection for a time, and to increase that ad-
vantage still more, and at the same time to benefit the
consumer by lowering the duty. He expected that the
consumption would be greatly increased by this plan,
and he believed the only chance of the planters con.
sisted in that great consumption. The recommei,dation
of the Committee held out the same advantage, 1);:t at
a sacrifice to the revenue of 960,000/. 11 would not
then go into the question of the probable increase of
consumption, but it was calculated that the revenue
would not suffer to the extent of more than 30,0001.
or 40,0001., and ultimately it would not be less than
it was at present. There remained the objection that
the measure would encourage the slave trade. If
were now a question proposed for the first time, that
no sugar, the produce of slave labour, should be
admitted, he would admit that was a fair ground
of objection.—(Hear.) But the proposition the House
had to deal with was not that of admitting slave labour
produce fur the first time. It was a question of increased
protection in favour of their own colonies. If the Hon.
Baronet (Sir R. Inglis) would repeal the act of 1846 al-
together, and totally prohibit slave-grown sugar, he
could then admit his argument against the present plan;
but his Hon. Friend must be convinced that it would be
a vain and fruitless effort. IF his lion. Friend were to
succeed in his views, and that sugar became dearer in
consequence, it would only occasion a fresh struggle and
fresh agitation, which would place the West Indian body
in the worst of all positions—namely, in the uncertainty
as to the amount of protection that Parliament could
afford them.—(Hear.) His belief was, that they adopted
a sound system when they said, in the first place, that
they would not admit slavery in any British possession,
and in the next place, when they said that they would
not consider the institution of slavery as a bar against
the admission of goods the produce of slave labour. It
was said that the Act of 1846 was inconsistent with
the Acts for putting an end to slavery; but, in his
opinion, the inconsistency was far greater in making a
distinction between sugar and other articles which were
produced by the labour of slaves, excluding one and
admitting the others.—(Hear, hear.) His belief was
that these distinctions of tariffs were not the mode by
which they could attain the abolition of slavery in the
world. He rather thought if they relied on the progress
of opinion, on the impatience that there would be on the
part of the slaves themselves retained in slavery in Cuba
and Brazil, when they saw the inhabitants of Jamaica
and Trinidad, and in the neighbouring islands, in a state
of freedom, that they would go on a better basis than by
giving protection to the We'st Indians. Setting aside the
question of slavery in the United States, of which he
was not able to see any satisfactory solution, he did ex.
pest that slavery in Cuba and Brazil would be abolished
—abolished all the sooner if they did not make it a
matter of tariffs and regulations—if they said, "We
have abolished slavery ourselves—we stand free from
any stain of this kind---We do not inquire into the insti-
tutions of foreign countries—we wish to see freedom
prevail—we leave it to its own strength and security,
and we leave to you the time and manner in which you
will follow our example. —(gear hear.)
Mr. MUNTZ said he had voted for the Bill of 1846,
because he understood it was to be a settlement of this
question. He would now vote against the proposition
of the Government because it was an
—(Hear.) He supported the measure
unsettlement of it.
the 1846 on free-
trade principles. There was no doubt the question was
one whether they would have free trade oislieeriyiloa—r
whether they would give up their colonies.
jesty's Government proposed a measure which seas no-
thing in itself. It deranged everything and arraeged-
nothing.--(Hear.) It was said that it would ito the planters. The planters would be in the
same Position in 1849 as they were now. It was a question of
whether they would kill them at once or bleed them to
death.—(Laughter.) Because he voted for the amend-
ment of the Honourable Baronet it did not follow from
that that he was going to support any proposition he was
going to make. He was going to vote against the pro-
position of the Government because he considered it
futile, peddling, and trivial—(Hear)—and was a depar-
ture from the Act of 1846.—(Hear.)
Mr. ANSTEY rose amidst loud shouts of " Divide,"
and " Oh, oh." He looked upon the present question as
a question of justice. As an Irish Member he protested
against the degrading offer made on the part of her
Majesty's Government by some agent, that if they sup-
ported the Government on this question they would not
be too firmly bound by the measure before the House.—
(Oh, oh.) The Hon. Member for the West Riding
must look on this as a question of the dismemberment
of the empire, because in a pamphlet called " England,
Ireland, and America, by a Manchester Manufacturer,"
supposed to be the Hon. Gentleman, he says that the
colonies are an encumbrance to this country; that it was
desirable they should get rid of the colonies; that
America had said that; and yet that America was their
best friend. Such were the opinions of the
free-trade school of Manchester. Honourable Members
on that side of the House had prophesied the results
of this measure, and now they might be recognised.—
(Cries of " Question.") The Hon. and Learned Member
continued amid much noise to quote from Mr. Cobden's
pamphlet, with a view of proving that the policy of the
free-trade school tended to the sacrifice of our colonies
and the dismemberment of the empire. The impatience
of the House increased to such a degree that the Hon.
and Learned Member was unable to obtain a hearing,
and, in consequence, he moved the adjournment of the
House.

Mr. FORBES seconded the motion.
Colonel DUNNE emphatically denied that any bar-
gain had been effered by the Chancellor of the Ex-
chequer to the Irish Members, or had been accepted by
those gentlemen, respecting the differential duties on rum.
Lord J. RUSSELL appealed to the Hon. and Learned
Member for Youghai to withdraw hia motion fur ftcyourn-
meet, and to allow the House to come to a division on
the main question.

Mr. AgSTEY having complained of the interruption,
explained that he had made no charge against the Irish
Members, of which body he was one himself. All he
had said was that an imputation of compromise had gone
abroad, and he had felt it to be his duty to stand up in
his place and repudiate it. Having withdrawn his mo-
tion for adjournment, the Honourable and Learned Gen-
tleman proceeded. With respect to the main question,
he conjured the House to pause before they voted for a
policy which might involve the destruction of some of
the most important of our colonies. It was hard that
the West Indies, which for 150 years had been the vic-
tims of a most rigid restrictive system, should now be
cast off and exposed to poverty and ruin, in compliance
with the new-fangled doctrines of free-trade policy.—
(Loud cries of " Divide.")
The House divided, when there appeared--
For the original m0ti0n............ 260 For Sir J. l'akington's amendment...... 245
Majority .................. --15
The announcement of the numbers was received with
loud cheers by the Protectionists.
The House then went into Committee, Mr. BERNAL
in the ohair.
A. resolution to the effect that the duty to be imposed
on foreign sugar from the sth of July, 1843, to the sth of
July, 1849, be 19s. 6d. per cwt.; from thence to July 5,
1850, 18s. per cwt.; from thence to July 5, 1851, 16s. 6d.
per cwt.; and after that date 15s. per cwt., was then read,
and the Chairman immediately reported progress, the
Committee to sit again to-morrow (this day), when the
resolution will be discussed.
Mr. M. GIBSON intimated that Mr. Bright intended
to propose his amendment, " That it was not expedient
to alter the Sugar Duties Act of 1846" as a substantive
motion.

Mr. WARD obtained leave to bring in a Bill to regu-
late, for a time to be limited, the premiums and annuities
of the Naval Medical Supplemental Fund Society.
The Bill was brought in and read the first time.
REPRESENTATIVE REFORM—MR. HUME'S
MO.
Mr. OSBORNE begged toTION ask his Hon. Friend the
Member for Montrose what he understood was to be
done with regard to his motion. A number of gentle-
men had come up to town on purpose to be present
during the debate, and being one of them, he wished to
know if the motion would positively be brought on on
Thursday next. He could assure his Honourable Friend
he was losing his division by thus putting off the motion
une day after another.—(Hear.)
Mr. lIUME said, if his Hon. Friend had been in the
House at five o'clock he would have known he had no
alternative but to put off the motion. He could only
say, in answer to the question that had been put to him,
the Noble Lord at the head of the Government had
assured him he would not interfere with Thursday.
Mr. MUNTZ did not understand these sort of ar-
rangements. Last week the Noble Lord gave up to-
morrow; then he took it back, and now wished to deter
the debate till Thursday. A week ago the Hon. Mem-
ber refused to put off his motion, yet now he postponed
it in the face of the Noble Lord's own direct acknow-
ledgment that he should have to- morrow.
Mr. WA WN said they had been sitting for six months,
anddonevery little.

Mr. MUNTZ wished to put another question to the
Hon. Member for Montrose. It was not yet fairly
settled when the subject was to come on again. It might
be deferred again, supposing it were fixed for Thursday;
and he again asked his Hon. Friend whether he had
come to a positive understanding with her Majesty's Go-
vernment that the debate should be resumed next Thurs.
day?--(Hear.)
Mr. HUME could only say the House had directed
the debate to be resumed next Thursday, but whether it
would come on then, he could not tell. He should
certainly endeavour to bring it on. There was some.
thing unreasonable and unfair in the proceedings of his
Hon. Friends, because they had stated publicly their
impressions just as if he had taken any part in post-
poning the subject. The fact was, at the commencement
of the sitting he had protested against the postpone-
ment ; and he considered it extremely unfair in his
Hon. Friends to argue as if he had agreed to the post-
ponement.
Mr. OSBORNE—You gave up.
Mr. HUME—I did not.—(A laugh.) If his Hon.
Friend had been in the House at five o'clock, he would
have found that the House agreed that public business
should go on to-morrow. It was unfair in his lion.
Friends to go out of town themselves, and then reproach
him for not bringing on the question. lie would tell
them, however, he did not want them.—(A laugh.) It
appeared to him that they only wanted to hold him up
to the country as a traitor; but he was not, and he never
would be.--(Laughter.)
Mr. BROTHERTON bore testimony to the efforts of
his Honourable Friend to bring on the motion, and he
added it was unjust for Members who had scarcely been
in the:House (once during the session, to assail his Hon.
Friend for not being successful. The fact was, it was
the duty of all Hon. Members to attend in the House
constantly, and not come up to town from the country
just when they thought a particular motion was coming
on.—(Hear.)
Mr. HUDSON thought the Honourable Member for
Montrose was entitled to the sympathy of the House.
—(A laugh.) In his difficult situation as head of a pro-
visional government, it was a little unfair for his friends

to attack him, for he (Mr. Hudson) could bear testimony
that he had done everything in his power to bring on
the question. The Hon. Gentleman certainly ought to
receive the sympathy of the House in his new and diffi-
I cult position; but he (Mr. Hudson) hoped he would here-
after contrive to keep his friends in better order. The
Hon. Member, however, was a little harshly dealt with
rby his friends.—(A laugh.)
Mr. MUNTZ had made no attack upon the Hon.
Member for Montrose; but he must say this, that if
he (Mr. Aluntz) had received a note from the Prime
Minister, fixing a certain night for the discussion, the
Prime Minister would have found considerable difficulty
in persuading him to depart from the arrangement.
Mr. HENLEY said the Hon. Member (Mr. Hume)
seemed to him to have done all in his power to please
all his colleagues or subjects by bringing on the measure,
but that did not appear to suit them. They seemed to
press the Hon. Member to say—" I will not bring it on,
because you want to go out of town."
After a few words from Mr. Wawn, Sir G. Grey, Mr.
Osborne, and Mr. Aglionby, the subject dropped.
The House adjourned at Two o'clock.

PARLIAMENTARY DIVISIONS.

From the Yotes and Proceedings of the House of Copunous.)
THURSDAY, JUNE 29.
SUGAR DUTIES.

---
Order read for resuming adjourned Debate on Amendment
proposed to be made to Question (June 19) " That Mr.
Speaker do now leave the Chair;" and which Amendment
was to leave out from the word " That" to the end of the
Question, in order to add the words " this House, consider.
ing the evidence taken during the present Session before the
Select Committee on Sugar and Coffee Planting, is of
opinion, that the remedies proposed by her Majesty's Minis-
ters for the great distress in the Sugar-growing Possessions
of the British Crown, which that Committee has unani-
mously declared to require an immediate application of relief,
will neither effect that object, nor check the stimulus to the
Slave Trade, which a diminution in the production of Sugar
in those Possessions must inevitably occasion," instead
thereof,:— Question again proposed, "That the words pro-
posed to be left out stand part of the Question." Debate
resumed :—Question put, "That the words proposed to be
left out stand part of the Question." The House divided ;
MAJORITY—AYES, 260.
Abdy, T. N. Freestnn, Colonel Ogle, S. C.
Adair,lllugh E. French, F. Ord, W.
Adair, R. Shafto Frewen, C. H. Owen, Sir J.
Aglionby, H. A. Gibson, T. M. Paget, Lord A.
Alcock, Thomas Glyn, George Carr Paget, Lord Clarence
Anderson, Arthur Grace, 0. 1). Paget, Lord G.
Anson, Colonel Graham, Sir James Palmer, Roundell
Anson, Viscount Grenfell, C. Pascoe Palmerston, Vit.
Armstrong, Sir A. Grenfel , Charles W. Parker, John
Arundel, Earl oc Grey, Sir George Pearson, Charles
BagshawlJoLut Grey, R. W. Pechell, Captain
Baines, M. T. Grosvenor, Lord R. Peel, Sir Robert
Baring, Henry Guest, Sir J. Perfect, Robert
Baring, Sir F. T. Hall, Sir B. Peto, Samuel K.
Barnard, E. G. Hallyburton, Lord Philips, Sir G. R.
Bellew, R. M. Hanmer, Sir J. Pigott, Francis
Berkeley, Captain Harcourt, G. Pilkington, James
Berkeley, H. F. Hardcastie, J. A. Price, Sir R.
Bernal, Ralph Haste, Alexander Pugh, David
Blake, M. J. Matte, Archibald Pusey, P.
Bolling, William Hawes, Benjamin Rapkael, Alexander
Bouverie,-E. P. Hay, Lord J. Reynolds, John
Bowring, Dr. Hayter, W. G. Ricardo, J. L.
Boyd, John Headlam, T. E. Ricardo, Osman
Boyle, Colonel Heathcoat, John Rice, E. R.
Brand, Thomas Heathcote, G. J. Robartes, T. J.
Brocklehurst, John Heneage, G. H. W. Roche, E. B.
Brotherton, J. Heneage, Edward Romilly,;Sir John
Brown, W. Henry, Alexander Russell, Lord John
Buller, Charles Heywood, James Hassell, Edward S.
Butler, P. S.: Hindley, C. Russell, F. C: H.
Callaghan, D. llobhouse, Sir John Rutherford, A.
Campbell, W. F. llobhouse, T. B. Salwey, Colonel
Carter, John B. Hodges, T. L. Scholefield, William
Caulfield, Colonel Hodges, T. Twisden Scrope, G. P.
Cavendish, C. C. liollond, Robert Seymour, Sir[H.
Cavendish, G. 11. Howard, C. W. Seymour, Lord
Cavendish, W.G. Howard, E. G. Shafto, R. D.
Childers, J. W. Howard, Sir R. Shell, R. L.
Chelineley, Sir M. Hughes, W. B. Shelburne, Earl of
Clay. James liumphery, Ald. Sheridan, R. B,
Clay, sir W. Jervis, Sir John Simeon, John
Cle
obements, Charles Kershaw, James Slaney, Robert A.
Cdn, Richard Kildare, Marquis Smith, R. V.
Cockburn, Alex.
Coke, Edward pc. King, Peter John Smith; John A.
Colebrooke, Sir T.
Labouchere, Henry Smith, J. Benjamin
Collins, Iv. Lacy, Henry C. Somerville. Sir W.
Cowper, W. F. Langston, J. H. Spearman, H. J.
Lascelles, W. S. Stanfield, W. R. C.
Craig, W. G.
Lemon. Sir CharleS Stanton, W. H.
Cubitt, William Leonard, T. B. Strickland, Sir G.
Currie, ltaikes Lewis, sir T. Stuart, Lord D.
Dalrymple,:Captain Lewis, G. C.
Dashwood, G. H. Littleton, E. R. Stuart, Lord J.
3Lioacchm,
n.inaomne:w...A. Teanlbonetn,t,C.iiß..
J.
Davie, Sir Henry
Thompson
Tickpnseze,
Dawson, T. V. Locke, Joseph Talfourd, Sergeant
Denison, W. J.
M'Cullagli, W. T. Tancred, H. W.
, R. A.
Denison, J. E.
Thvett, E. M'Gregor, John
M'Taggart, Sir J. Thompson Colonel
Douglas, Sir C.
Douro, Marquis of Maher, N. , George
Thornely, Thomas
Duff', G. S. Maitland,;Thomas Tollemache .
Duke, Sir James Marshall, J. IG. Towneley, John) Duncan, Lord Marshall, W. Townley, E.G.:
Duncan, George Martin, John Townshend, Captain
Duncuft, John Martinr. W. Traill,lGeorge
Duudas, Admiral Martin, Samuel Trelawny, J. S.
Dundas, Sir D. Matheson, A. Turner. E.
Ebrington, Viscount Matheson, James Vane, Lord H.
Ellice, E., jun. Matheson, Colonel Verney, Sir H.
Elliot, J. E. Maule, Fox 'Villiers, Charles
Enfield, Lord Melgund, Viscount Vivian, J. H.
Estcourt, J. B. B. Milner, W. M. Wall, C. B.
Evans, Sir De Lacy Milnes, R. M. 0 Ward, H. G.
Evans, John Milton, Viscount Watkins, Colonel
Evans, William Mitchell, A. T. Westhead, J. P.
Ewart, William Molesworth, Sir W. Willcox, Brodie
Fergus, John . Morpeth, Viscount Williams, John
Ferguson, Col. Morison, Sir W. Wilson, James -
Ferguson, Sir R. Morris, David Wilson, Matthew
Fitzpatrick, JW. Mostyn, E. Wood, Sir Charles
Fitzwilliam, G. W. Mulgrave, Earl Wrightson, W. B.
Foley, J. H. Noel, Gerald J. Wyld, James
Fordyce, A. D. tiorreys, Lord Young, Sir John
Forster, M. Norreys, Sir D.
Fortescue, Chichester O'Brien, Jolla' TIMM.
Fortescue, J. W. O'Brien, Timothy Tufhell, Henry
Fox, W. J. O'Connell, M. J. Hill, Lord Marcus

Acland, Sir T. D.
Adare, Viscount
Adderley, C. B.
Anstey, Thomas C.
Archdall, Captain
Bagge, William
Bagot, William
Bailey, Joseph, jun.
Baillie, H. J.
Baldock, E. H.
Baldwin, Barry
Bankes, G.
Barkly, Henry
Baring, Thomas
Barrington, Viscount
Bateson, T.
Beckett, W.
Benbow,!John
ilenett, J.
Bennet, Philip
Bentinck, Lord G.
Bentinck, Lord H.
Beresford, William
Berkeley, Grantley
Birch, Sir Thomas
Blackall, S. W.
Bourke, Richard S.
Bowles, Admiral
Bramston, T. W.
Bremridge, Richard
Broadley Henry

MINORITY—NOES, 245.
Fagan, William Napier,. Joseph
Farnham, E. Neeld, John
Ferrer, James Neeld, Joseph
Fellowes, E. Newdegate, N.
Filmier, Sir E. Newport, Visct.
Fitzroy, Henry Nugent, Lord
Floyer, John Oltrien,Sir Lucius
Forbes, William O'Connor, Feargus
Forester, G. C. Ossulton, Lord
Fox, S. L. Oswald, A.
Fuller, A. E. Packe, C. W.
Galway, Viscount Palmer, Robert
Oaskell, J. M. Pattison, James
Gladstone, W. E. Peel, Colonel
Godson,lß. Pennant, Colonel
Gooch, E. S. Pigot, Sir R.
Gordon, Admiral Plowden, W. H.
Gore, W. 0. Powell, Col.
Goring, Charles Powlett, Lord W.
Goulburn, Henry Reid. Colonel 4
Granby, Marquis of Rendlesham, Lord
Greene, John Renton, John C.
Greene, Thomas Repton, G. W.
Grogan, E. Richards. Richard :
Gwyn, How el Robinson. George
Ilaggitt, F. H. Rolleston, Colonel
Hale, R. B. Rufford, Francis
Halford, Sir 11. Rushout, Captain
Hall, Colonel Sadloir, John _
Halsey, T. P. Sanders, George
Hamilton, G. A. Scott, F.
Ilamilton, J. H. Scully Francis
Hamilton, Lord C. Seaham, Viscount
Harris, Captain Seymer, Henry Ker
Hayes, Sir E. Shirley, E. J.
Henley, J. W. Sibthorp, Colonel
Herbert, Sydney Sidney, Alderman
lierries, J. C. Smyth, John G.
Hervey, Lord A. Smythe, George
lilldyard, It. C. Smollett, A.
Hildyard, T. B. Somerset, Captain
Hodgson, W. N. Somerton, Viscount
Hood, Sir A. Sotheron, T. H. S.
Hope, H. T. t Spooner, Richard
Hornby, John Stafford, Augustus
Hotham, Lord Stuart, Henry
Hudson, George Stuart, J.
Hume, Joseph Slut, 11. G.
Ingestre, Viscount Sullivan, Michael
Inglis, Sinit. Sutton, H. M.
Jocelyn, Viscount Taylor, T. E.
Johnstone, Sir J. Thesiger, Sir F.
Jolliffe, Sir W. H. Thompson, Alderman
Jones, Captain Thornhill, G.
Keogh, William Tollemache, Jobil
Knightley, Sir C. Trevor, G. R.
Knox, Colonel Trollope, Sir J.
Lasccllcs, E. Turner, G. J.
Legh, G. C. Urquhart, David
Lennox, Lord HG. Verner, Sir W.
Lincoln, Earl of Vesey, T.
Lindsay, Colonel Villiers, Viscount
Lockhart, A. E. 'Villiers, F. W.
Lockhart, W. Vivian, J. E.
Lowther, Henry Vyse, H.
Mackenzie, W. F. Waddington. David
M'Naghten, Sir E. Waddington, H. S.
Mallon, Lord Walpole, S. H.
Mandeville, Viscount Walsh, Sir J. B.
Mangles, R. D. Walter, John
Manners, Lord C. Wawn, J T.
Manners, Lord G. Welby, G. E.
March, Earl of Williams, T. P.
Masterman, John Williamson, Sir H.
Maxwell, J. I'. Willoughby, Sir 11.
Meux, Sir' Henry Wodehouse,E.
Miles, P. W. S. Worcester, Marquis
Monsell, William Wortley, J. S.
Moore, George H. Wyvill, M.
Morgan, 0.
Mailings, J. B. TELLERS.
Muntz, G F. Pakington, Sir J. S.
Mure, Colonel Buxton, Sir E.

Brooke, Lord
Bruce, Lord E.
Bruce, C. L.
Bruen, Colonel

Buck, L. W.
Buller, Sir J. Y.
Bunbury, W.
Burghley, Lord

Burrell, Sir C.
Cabbell, B. B.
Cardwell, Edward
Carew, W. P.
Charterls, Francis
Chichester, Lord J.
Christopher, R.
Christy, Samuel
Clerk Sir:G.
Clive, It. H.
Clive, Henry B.
Cochrane, A.
Cocks, Thomas S.
Codrington, Sir W.
Cole, H. A.
Coles, 11. B.
Compton, H. C.
Conolly, Col.
Copeland, Alderman
Corry, H.
Cotton, W. 11.
Oonrtenay, Lord
Currie, Henry
Darner, Colonel
Davies, D. A. S.
Devereux, J. T.
Disraeli, B.
Dod, J. W.
Dodd, George
Drag, J. S. W.
Drumlanrig, Vis.
Drummond, Homo
Duckworth, Sir J.
Duncombe, A.
Duncombe, 0.
Dundas, George
Dunne, Francis P.
The Pre, C. G.
East, Sir:J. B.
Edwards, Henry
Egerton, Sir P.
Egerton, W. T.
Emlyn, Viscount
Euston, Earl

CHELTENHAM ELECTION.

- - - -
CHELTENHAM, THURSDAY EVENING.—The polling
commenced at eight o'clock this morning. The Hon. C.
F. Berkeley kept the lead all day, and at the close the
numbers were as follows
Hon. C. F. Berkeley
Mr. Gardner ....

Majority for Mr. Berkeley 76
A good deal of excitement prevailed throughout the
day.

HORSIIAM ELECTION.

_ - - -
The polling for this borough took place yesterday.
At four o'clock the Under-Sheriff declared the result to
be as follows :
Mr. Fitzgerald
Lord E. Howard
Mr. Fitzgerald having been declared duly elected,,
thanked the electors for the honour conferred on him.
Lord E. Howard likewise thanked his supporters,
who, with only two or three exceptions, had recorded
their votes in his favour uncanvassed and unasked.

FORGING OPERA ORDERS.--We have been re-
quested by Mr. Grogan, of the firm of Grogan and
Scott, Strand, and of the Lyceum Theatre, to state that
Alfred Grogan, who was committed from Bow-street the
day before yesterday on a charge of forging orders for
her Majesty's Theatre (an account of whose examina-
tion appeared in The Sun of yesterday), is in no way
connected with the business in the Strand, or with the
Lyceum Theatre.

[ADVERTISEMENT.)—Cured by Holloway's oint-
ment and Pills Wounds in a Leg after more than Three
Years' Suffering.—The wife of Mr. James P. Springle,
schoolmaster, of the town of St. Patrick, Grenada, had
been suffering with an ulcerated leg for more than
three years, which was so bad that it baffled the skill of
all the professional practitioners in the island, who could
not possibly Beal it; after every other remedy had failed,
Holloway's Ointment and Pills were resorted to, and, by
their powerful efficacy, the wounds were soon headed,
and a perfectly sound cure effected. These medicines
excel all others in the cure of Scrofula, King's evil,
Glandular or other unnatural swellings. Sold by all
Druggists, and at Professor Holloway's Establisbmsent
244, Strand, London.