The Sun.
London, England, 1846-10-13 00:00:00

Mb) OLESEX.

The reN:sion for the list of voters for the county of
Middlesex was commenced yesterday at White Conduit-
house, by Mr. Shadwell, the barrister appointed for that
purpose.
The Liberty of the Rolls, and the parishes of St.
George the Martyr and St. Andrew, were gone through.
The claim of the Rev. W. Rogers was opposed by the
Liberals, on the ground of an insufficient description of
his qualification.
Mr. JAMES, for the objectors, submitted that the de-
scription of " incumbent of the district church of St.
Thomas, Charter-house," was not a sufficient description.
The law could not recognise such a qualification, and, in
Brighton the barrister had struck off five clergymen out
of six on the same ground.
Mr. Payne, the Conservative agent, said that he was
aware that the Revising Barrister had expunged the
name last year upon the same ground, and if he now
retained his opinion, all he (Mr. Payne) would ask was,
that a case might be granted. _ _ _

The LearitCA BARRISTER said he had no objection
to do so.
Claim di3allowed.
The claim of the Rev. Edward Pizey, perpetual curate
of St. Peter's district church, Saffron-hill, was also dis-
allowed under similar circumstances, the Barrister ob-
serving that unquestiinably the Rev. Gentleman was
entitled to be on the register if the qualification had been
properly described as " freehold p,w rents.'
An appeal, in which all caies of a similar nature
would be consolidated, was then granted by the Bar-
rister.

The lists of Gray's Inn, St. Giles-in-the-Fields, St.
George's, Bloomsbury ; Islington, Clerkenwell, and St.
,Boto!ph without Aldersgate, were gone through without
any point meriting notice hiving arisen.
The overseer of the latter parish presented his bill of
expenses ; but the Barrister refused to allow any, as the
list or objections and claims had not been properly made
out, the claimants being inserted in the general list, and
the objections mixed up with those relating to the City.
Mr. SHADWELL said he hoped it would make the
overseers more careful in future.
In the list of St. Luke's the name of a Mr. D'Elargor
was objected to by Mr. Payne.' The claimant's qualifica-
tion was for a rent charge of 40s. per annum. According
to the deed of grant the first half-yearly payment became
due on July 2, but a receipt dated January 10 was pro-
duced for 11.
Mr. James and Mr. R. Fitch support'A the vote, con-
tending that the payment on January 10 was a sufficient
enjoyment of the rent-charge for six months prior to
e for the purpose of obtain-
July 31, to satisiy the Reform Act
a the enjoyment of the rent-eharge
Mr. Payne, on the contrary,. urged that the voluntary
ing a
t Januarythat the was mace
could only he said to have commenced on July 2.
The Learned BARRISTER, however, decided that the
payment of the amount in January was a sufficient
reV,l compliance with the statute, and allowed the

vote.
The lists of Islingrin, St. 111arylebone, and Stoke
Newington were disposed of without the occurrence of
aught deserving notice.
The remaining parishes of SantaPtahnecreaosa,
Court adjourned
and St. Sepulchre, were also gone through without elicit:
sinhgoratniyy
bfeeta.otrieir6e oofeirlko.rtanee,