The Sun.
London, England, 1846-11-13 00:00:00

- course, but but had raised a question mhich was not at
i,sue in the original bill, making certain parties
not named therein as defendants, and drawing into the
question a matter quite beyond the due limits of the
original subject of litigation. The matter bad refererce
to the sale of a ship, which madeen sold to Mr. Hopper,
the defendant, who had been a party to the suit
that was pending between claimants to the vessel in
question prior to the sale.
His Horton's. said the proper order would be to ex-
punge the charge, and therefore he would make a decree
to that effect. The order had reference to the costs.
The other questions would be decided, when the pre••
. die question at issue in the cause came before the Court
I for trial.

now prepared with affidavits, which stated that the de-
fendant left this country a short time since, after having
iiv,d in ;t inr Ptr.)m.l 't
he I

Peers, Members of Parliament, and others would refuse
to attend or give evidence either in law or equity ; but
;r bppn chcidcd that they ..,_re bound to do SO, rnu

iw had no intention whatever of leaving England again, r
hat his objee. was to remain in the country, and to
obta;n a situation in a mercantile house in the city of
London, and that he had a great number of friends in
this country who were exerting themselves to further
the objects he bad in view, and further, that as the
Austrian Government had seized the whole of his pro-
perty at Smyrna, there was no power in the law of
England to hold his person in custody.
Mr. Baron PARE—Ii the defendant still in cus-
tody?
Mr. CRAMPTON—He is, my Lord.
LORD CHIEF BARON—Take a rule nisi.
(Sittings at Nisi Prins, before Mr. Baron PUTT and
Common Juries.)
BANKS V. WHITWELL.
This was an action brought to recover the sum of
1251., being the balance of an account for engraving the
plans and sections of the Bristol and Dover Railway, and
also the Leeds and Newcastle Railway. The de-
fendant was the engineer to both of these lines.
The defence set up was that the work was so badly
done as to be entirely useless for the purpose
of Parliamentary deposit, and, several witnesses
were called, who stated that the proofs, as sent home by
the plaintiff, were not correct, and that they required
the additional labour of upwards of twenty hands to cor-
rect and prepare them, and that in some of the proofs
neither the line of railway nor the deviation lines were
shown. There was no evidence, however, to show that
the original copy or tracings sent to the engraver for the
purpose of engraving from, had either of these requisites
Worked upon them, no notice having been served by the
defendant upon the plaintiff to produce them.
The jury immediately found a verdict for the sums
claimed.

Fusing too give evidence.
A warrant was accordingly issued.

MIDDLESEX SESSIONS.
(Before the AssISTANT•JUDGE and a full Bench of
Magistrates.)
ASSAULTING THE POLlCE.—Jeremiah Harrington and
Mary, his wife, the latter with an infant in•her arms,
were indicted for a violent assault upon Henry Fitch, a
constable of the F division of police, under the follow-

ing circumstances._
Police-constable 'Flitch, 111 F, stated that on the 25th
of last month, a tradesman, named Thomas Matthews,
came to him on his beat, and required him to go and
take the prisoner into custody for assaulting him vio-
lently. Observing that Matthews bore evidence of vio-
lence upon his person, he proceeded to the prisoners'
residence, in Dudley-court, Crown-street, for the purpose
of taking him into custody, where a large mob, chiefly
of the lowest class of Irish had assembled, and when he
laid hold of the prisoner, he struck him and knocked him
down, and kicked trim so severely that his ribs were
fractured, and he was taken to the hospital, where he
remained eight days. The mob encouraged the prisoner
and held witness down on the ground while the prisoner,
Mary Harrington, brought a kettle of boiling water
which the male prisoner poured over him.
Mr. PRENDF.RGAST appeared for the defence, and
contended that, according to the provisions of the
Metropolitan Police Act, the prosecutor was not justified
in aprehending the defendant on a charge of assault
which he had not witnessed, more especially as the
alleged assault upon Matthews was committed at an
hour
where, a magistrate was sitting.
The
in JUDGE, in summing up, said
when,
and
ed A close
ssnbiANT.
he did not coincide the law as laid down by the
Learned Counsel. Some time since the growing wants
of the metropolis requited that alterations in the powers
vested in constables, so far as cases of assault were con-
cerned, should be made ; and it was consequently
thought necessary to vest a discretionary power in
them, so far as what were termed aggravated as-
saults were concerned ; such as where the party
bore evidence of personal violence, or other indica-
tions of having been attacked. He (the Assistant-
Judge) considered that a constable would have no
right in the greater number of cases to interfere, if two
or three hours intervened between the alleged assault
and the time of the application to him, his duty would
then be to refer the party to a magistrate; but when the
application was made immediately after the commission
of the assault, and the offending party was adjacent, and
that other circumstances were present to indicate an ag-
gravated assault, upon which the jury would be the
judges, he thought the constable justified in making the
arrest, and the parties violently resisting were guilty of
an assault. With respect to the female prisoner, al-
though her conduct had been very violent, he felt in-
clined to look leniently on her, because in her class of
life- some allowance might perhaps be made for her feel-
ings towards her husband.
The jury having returned a verdict of Guilty, the
Learned Judge said, in conseauence of the long confine-
ment they had already undergone, he would only sen-
tence the prisoner to three weeks' imprisonment, and
,he female to one week, the latter to be without hard
abcur.

COURT OF QUEEN'S BEACH, Nov. 12.
(Sittings in Banco.)
MURIETTA V. OLDFIELD.
The arguments in this part-heard case were resumed
at the sittings of the Court this morning. The case
arose out of a dispute with regard to the policy of an
insurance on the ship Harold, which received so many
injuries in its voyage that her captain was obliged to
put in at Monte Video in order to have her sur-
veyed and repaired. A survey was made, but the
surveyor reported that the expense of the renovation
would be thrown away upon her,.and the ship was sold.
It appeared, however, that Monte Video was under
arms at the time, and that the expence and difficulty
of repairing a ship in such a state of things would
have been so great that it was thought better to sacri-
fice her for an insignificant sum, and that if she had
been taken to some other port in an undisturbed state
that she might have been easily and cheaply re-
paired. An action was brought by the owners
in order to recover the amount of the policy,
on the ground that the vessel was not destroyed by
negligence, and a verdict was found for the defendant.
A rule was subsequently obtained from this Court, call-
ing upon the defendant to show cause why a new trial
should not be had, on the ground of the reception of an
improper document in evidence. The document was the
surveyor's certificate of the state of the sh whn he
surveyed it and estimated the cost of her repairs at
Monte Video.
Mr. Burr and Mr. WILDE appeared against the rule.
Mr. MARTIN and Mr. WATSON followed at great length
in support of the rule.
The COURT took time to consider the matter.
THE LATE CASE OF MILITARY FLOGGING AT HOUNSLOW--
TEE QUEEN V. MICHAEL COOKE AND THOMAS HEALEY.
The ATTORNEY GENERAL said, I have to move, your
Lordships, at the instance of Mr. Wakley, a Member
of Parliament for the borough of Finsbury, and coroner
for Middlesex, for a rule calling upon Michael Cooke
and Thomas Healey, who are the printers and publishers
of a newspaper called the Medical Times, to show cause
why a_criminal information should not be filed against
them for a libel published in that paper of the
Ist of August last. Your Lordships will perhaps
recollect that an investigation was held, a short time
since, on the body of a person called White, a private
soldier in the 7th Hussars, who died in the Hounslow
brrracks. The attention of Mr. Wakley, as coroner, was
directed to the death of that individual by a letter which
he received from a minister of the neighbourhood. The
Rev. Mr. Trimmer, and also a magistrate. Until the
receipt of that letter Mr. Wakley was not aware of the
death of White, and consequently had no means of hold-
ing an investigation on his body. Upon the receipt of
the letter he directed the Rev. Mr. Trimmer to
communicate with the constable of the district, for the
purpose of making the necessary inquiries, in order that
be might afterwards furnish him (Mr. Wakley) with
the information he might obtain, so that he might
determine whether it was necessary to hold an in-
quest or not ; but before that letter was delivered
the constable came to the residence of Mr. Wakley, and
stated that from the rumours which were then prevalent
in the neighbourhood that it would be necessary to hold
an inquest on the body of the soldier. He stated also
that he came to town by the direction of the Rev. Mr.
Trimmer and of another magistrate (Mr. Pownall). Upon
the receipt of this information, Mr. Wakley, as was his
duty, issued directions to the proper officer, of holding
an inquest on the body, and on the jury assembling and
viewing the body, preliminary to the investigation, they
ascertained that excoriations of the body had taken
place, but that the spine, and the muscles about it,
had not been properly examined, and they requested
the coroner to appoint a person whom he thought fit for
the office, in order to make an xamination. He ac-
cordingly named Mr. Day, who r eesided in the neigh
bourhood. When the jury met on the second occasion,
it was found that Mr. Day had not, as the jury
thought, made a proper examineion of the body, particu-
larly about the spine and adjoining muscles, and asked
him to nominate another. On his way to London he
met Mr. Wilson, a gentleman of great eminence, whom
he appointed to examine the body. On the Ist
of August, the inquiry was adjourned, Mr. Wilson
and all the medical men gave their evidence
on the Ist of August. On the 3d the jury were to hear
the summing up of the coroner, and arrive at their ver-
dict. The libel appeared between the Ist and the 3d.
The Learned Gentleman then read the alleged libel,
which stated that the whole proceedings at the inquest
were a farce ; that he would be consigned to infamy
after what had taken place if he did not prove that the
soldier died from military torture and that he had coaxed
the private soldiers of the regiment in order that he
might bring a charge of murder to the door of an
eminent medical man (Dr. Warren) to conjure up such
a charge against him and Colonel 'Why to, and the
farrier and drummer, and that he had actzd throughout
the investigation, in order to gain public sentiment in
his favour, to help his fortunes for the future. It went
on to accuse him of prostitutihg the office of an English
magistrate for the purpose of seeking applause ; that the
inquest was a melodrama; and that Mr. Wilson and
Mr. Wakley had connived together for the purpose of
preparing a colourable statement to the jury; and con-
cluded by stating that they shared the fees which Mr.
Wilson received for post mortem examinations.
The COURT granted the application.
BAIL CO 1.1.1 CT, 'Nov. 12.

NOMINATION OF SHERIFFS.
At a quarter past one o'clock the Barons left the
Court, and shortly after the Right Hon. Charles Wood,
the Chancellor of the Exchequer, entered in his robes,
when the usual oaths of allegiance were administered,
(this being the first term of his year of office) to him by
the Clerk of the Court.
The Right Honourable Gentleman then called upon
Mr. Crampton, the •` tub man," if he had any motion
to make, that Learned Gentleman having made a motion,
the Right Hon. Gentleman and the Barons of the Ex-
chequer, withdrew. kW*
Their Lordships entered shortly after, for the purpose
of nominating the Sheriffs for the different counties of
England and Wales. There were present on the bench,
the Chancellor of the Exchequer, the Lord Chancellor, the
Marquis of Lansdowne, Lord Denman, Lord Campbell,
Lord Chief Justice Wilde, Sir George Grey, Mr Justice
Maule, Baron Rolfe, Mr. Justice Wightman, Mr. Justice
Erle, Mr. Baron Platt, Mr. Vaughan Williams, Mr.
Greville, the secretary to the Court.
The usual forms having been gone through, the Court
rose at half-past three.

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, Nov. 12.
HARVEY V. ROVES.
In this case the rule for a new trial was refused.

TAYLOR V. PAGE.
In this case also the Court refused to disturb the
verdict.
• -

REGISTRATION APPEALS.
Tbis was the first day set apart for the hearing of the
registration appeals. When the Court was about pro-
ceeding with the hearings. several applications were.
made to postpone cases on account of the non-arrival of
the paper books.
The LORD CHIEF JUSTICE on granting the applica-
tions,.m severely commented on the neglect of the attores
in not being prepared with the cases in time, and inti-
mated that the Court would in future be disposed to deal
more stringently with them.
HAYDON V. THE OVERSEERS OF TIVERTON.—SOMERSET

POLICE INTELLIGENCE.
MANSION-HOUSE.
Marian Graesterk, who stated her age to be twen _
four years, was brought before the Lord Mayor upon
the charge of having deserted her child.
Mr, Hobler appeared for the prisoner.
William Lewis (policeman 566) stated that he had
been sent for at half-past uine o'clock on Wednesday
night, by a gentleman, in the neighbourhood of Thames-
street, who informed him that a young woman, who af-
terwards proved to be the prisoner, placed a baby within
his door and ran away. From some boys in the neigh •
bourbood the policeman learned that a lad, who knew
the prisoner, knocked at the door to oblige her, and had
immediately after disappeared with her. The child was
conveyed to the relieving overseer of the parish, and a
search was made for the prisoner, who, it uppeard, was
the mother, and who stated that the son of the gentle-
man in whose house she had left her infant was the father,
that she was unable any longer to support it, and had, to
save it from starving, deposited it where proper care
ought and could be taken of it. She at once admitted
that sbe had committed the act of desertion, and she
declared that the young gentleman who was the father
had from time to time given her money amounting to
101., but had of late ceased to assist her in any way to
support the infant.
Mr. Wire (of the firm of Wire and Child) said he at-
tended to watch the case, which had been decided upon
elsewhere, and which must have been thus brought on
again by a dextrous manoeuvre, in the hope of adding to
evidence which had already failed iu the object. The
young woman at the bar had had a child before, to
whom she had allotted a different paternity, and it
would, he submitted, be unfair to allow statements to be
made which had no reference to the offence charged
against her, and which were calculated to reflect upon
the character of a person falsely accused. If statements
of the kind were permitted to be made, there was no
protection for any body, and Mr. fabler himself might
be the unconscious aject of accusation.
Mr. Hobler said the Lord Mayor would himself de-
cide how far it would be proper to hear the statement of
the witness. It was certain that the offence with which
the prisoner is charged was aggravated or palliated by
the circumstances connected with it, and the testimony
of the witness was calculated to explain its nature and
extent.
The LORD MAYOR said he considered himself bound
to hear what the prisoner had to say in her defence. He,
at the same time, desired that all the extraneous matter
should be omitted.
The policeman having added nothing of any conse-
pence to his statement,
The prisoner was told by the Lord Mayor that if she
wished to say any thing in her defence, she was then at
liberty to speak it.
The prisoner said she had left the child in the place in
which it was found, because she had no food to give it.
She had struggled a long time to keep it, but being re-
duced to the last extremity, she had no choice left. The
gentleman she had mentioned was the father, and he had
given her 5/. to begin with, and afterwards he had given
her money to the same amount.
The LORD MAYOR said he adjourned the case till
Monday next, and that he would accept bail for the ap-
pearance of the prisoner on that day, in the sum of 201.
The bail was tendered and accepted.
[We omit the name of the alleged father, for obvious
reasons.]
Alexander Ogilty, a seaman, was brought up for final
examination, charged with having wounded three of the
City police.
The prisoner, it appeared, had gone into a dru,ggist's
shop in Fenchurch-street, at nine o'clock on Monday
night, very drunk, and asked for a bottle of soda-water,
with which he was served, and which he paid for. He
remained in the shop upwards of half-an-hour, and could
not stand upright. A policeman was, however, called
to remove him, but the prisoner refused to leave the shop,
and was at length taken to the station-house, after having
the inspector locked him up, but he became so
n
struck and tried to stab the officer. At the station-
house,
that it was found necessary to open the door and
remonstrate with him. The inspector upon opening the
door received a cut on the head, but how he could not
tell ; but a sergeant who, when the inspector went for
more assistance, held the prisoner by the collar, was
desperately attacked by him, and wounded by him in the
hand with a knife.
Mr. Childs, the surgeon to the City police force, de-
scribed the injuries which the men received. The wound
inflicted upon one of them was situate over the principal
arteries of the head, and might have been of serious
consequence. It had evidently been inflicted with a

EASTERN DIVISION.
Mr. CCCILDIIIIN appeared on behalf of the appellant in
this case, and against the admission of the name of
Mr. Ainsworth, resident in Tiverton, on the register
of electors for the Eastern Division of Somersetshire.
The qualification claimed, as in respect of a tree-rent
charge, and the objection taken was, that the respondent
had not been in a beneficial possession of the property
for six calendar months, previous to the 31st of
July. The rent charge was eight years old, but
the interest on it had been conveyed on the 29th of
January, by a deed of settlement. The first payment
for rent became due on the 25th of March, but it was
not paid till the 29th of April. He, therefore, submitted
that the respondent was not in bona fide possession of
the property, or in the reception of rents for six calendar
months, before the 31st of. July, which he was required
to be by the Reform Act.
Mr. Sergeant BYLES, for the respondent, submitted
that the transfer of the property, for a valuable con-
sideration, into the hands of the respondent, constituted
the possession intended by the Act.
The LORD CIIIEFJusncE said it was important that the
decisions given in interpretation ()Übe law should be clear
and intelligible, without any hair-drawn distinctions. The
question the Court had to consider was, whether there
was any peculiar feature in this case to take it out of
the decision previously given by the Court respecting
the possession of freehold property? He did not think
any valid distinction had been made. The Court had
decided that the possession of freehold property for six
calendar months before the 31st of July meant the
actual receipt of rents, and whereas in the present case
the previous possessor, Nash, had conveyed without re-
servation the whole of his interest to Amworth, the
latter stood in the same position as if the rent charge had
just been created, and therefore, not having received the
rent for six calendar months, the vote must be ex-
punged.
• The rest of their Lordships concurred.

EADSFORTH V. FARRER.—THE BOROUGH OF LANCASTER.
Mr. Sergeant BYLES appeared for the appellant in the
present case, which was a consolidated one. The point
at issue was, that the respondent, who had objected to
the appellant's vote, had not, in doing so, properly de-
scribed himself. In consequence of the objection, the
appellant's name had been expunged from the register.
The Learned Gentlemen quoted the 17th section of the
Registration Act and the decision of the Court in several
cases in support of his arguments.
Mr. Sergeant KINGLAKE maintained that the notice
of objection was good. The real question was raised on
the 101st section of the Act, which provided that no
misnomer in any notice should invalidate it, provided
what was set forth in it was such as to be commonly un-
derstood. Of this the Revising Barrister could alone at
the time be the judge, and having admitted the notice in
the present cast', it must be taken as fulfilling the condi-
tion of section 101. He submitted, therefore, that the
appeal should be dismissed.
The COURT was of opinion that the notice of objection
given in this case was not sufficient. Under section 101,
though t certain power of interpretation was given to
the Revising Barrister, it did not allow him to dispense
with any of the essential forms given in the statute re-
specting registrations. It was required, specifically, that
in any borough, like the one under consideration, where
there was more than one list of voters, that the list in
which the name of the objector, appeared, should be
distinctly stated in the notice making the objection.
This had not been the case in the present instance, and,
therefore, the Revising Barrister's decision must be re-
versed, and the name of the appellant placed on the
register.
This decision places 27 votes on the register which
had been expunged.
CARLOW V. THE EARL OF MEXBOROUGH.
The Court having heard Mr. Lush against a rule nisi
for a new trial in this case, which was an action on two
bills of exchange, made the rule absolute.
The Court adjourned at three o'clock.

THE QUEEN V. MOTTRAM.
Mr. HAWKINS applied for a writ of certiorari to bring
up into this Court the ca se of a Mr. Mottram, now lying
in Derby gaol upon a charge of manslaughter, and for
a rule to show cause why he should not be admitted
to bail.
The facts of the case were these :—The deceased,
about a fortnight before his death, caught a severe cold
and called in two regular surgeons. He gradually be-
came worse, and at the end of a fortnight the defendant
went up to see him. The only evidence against him was
that he was seen to mix some white stuff in a cup, and
give it to the deceased, who afterwards died. The de-
fendant was a sort of quack, and he administered spi-
ritual, as well as bodily, consolation to the deceased. On
these grounds, they sought to found a charge of admi-
nistering drugs to cause death.
Mr. Justice PATTESON—You may have a certiorari
and a rule to show cause why the defendant should not
be admitted to bail in the country.

THE QUEEN V. LORD._ CONTRACTS BETWEEN MASTER

AND SERVANT.

Mr. HIIDDLESTONE moved for a writ of certiorari to
remove a conviction into this Court for a habeas corpus
to bring up the defendant, in order that he might be
admitted to bail until the argument upon the certiorari
had been heard. In this case a conviction had been ob-
tained under the Masters and Servants' Act, 4th Geo.
IV., chap. 34. He (Mr. Huddlestone) rested his appli-
cation on two very important and substantial points.
The first was the validity of any contract which the
workman was compelled to enter upon with the master ;
and, second, whether these contracts were binding upon
infants. The contract in this instance had been drawn
up between John Mason and James Lord ; that the said
James Lord should serve John Mason for twelve months;
and in case of any illness, absenteeism, or accident to
the machinery, by which Mason should not have the
benefit of Lord's work, Mason should cease to pay him
his wages. It was for an infraction of this agreement
that the conviction took place. lie (Mr. lluddlestone)
submitted to the Court that the contract was null and
void in the first instance, as it was unreasonable and in
restraint of trade.
Mr. Justice PATTESON could not concur in any such
view of the case. It did not appear to him to be in
restraint of trade.
Mr. HUDDLESTONE cited many cases in which the de-
cision had been obtained against the contract in conse-
quence of its being unreasonable and in restraint of
trade. The question as to how far the contract was
binding upon infants had never yet been decided.
Mr. Justice PATTESON—If the contract were binding
upon the master and not upon the infant he (the infaut)
might say to his master that he would leave when he
chose, and compel his master to take him back when he
chose; unless, perhaps, you consider one leaving with-
out notice to annul the contract on both sides.
Mr. HIIDDLESTONE said that that was another point
to be decided.
After some further technical points bad been put for-
ward the application was granted.

SHERIFFS' COURT, Nov. 12.
(Before Mr. Under3heriff BURCIIELL.)

STAPLETON V. DAVIS-COMING HOME FROM THE DERBY,

This was an action to recover damages for the loss of
a horse and damage done to a gig.
Mr. Simon appeared for the plaintiff, and stated the ease.
The plaintiff is a livery stable keeper, in Bury-street,
Chelsea. On the last Derby day at Epsom the de-
fendant hired a horse and chaise of the plaintiff, to go to
the races; be got down safely, but like many others
tha " coming home from the Derby" was not so agree-
able to the defendant—the horse and gig arrived at the
plaintiffs stables in a woeful plight. The gig was much
damaged, the horse's knees were broken, and the de-
fendant said that he got so drunk over his bad luck that
he did not know what he was doing, and his greatest
surprise was that he had not broken his neck. The
horse was so much overdriven, and so much injured, that
although it was sent to a veterinary surgeon, it died at
the end of the week. All these facts were set forth in
the declaration, and as the defendant had not pleaded to
the action, he admitted his liability. The damages
claimed were 31. 15s. for the repairs of the gigs, and 21.
for the keep of the horse and medicine, 4/. 10s, for loss
during the time the horse was ill and the gig out of
repair, and 121. the value of the horse. The defendant
had promised to indemnify the plaintiff for all loss, and
it was to be regretted that he had not kept his promise.
William Eve, groom to the plaintiff, was called, and
said he saw the " turn out" start very comfortably, but
when it came back it was over abused " even for a Derby
day." It was in a most " awful state." The horse died
in eight days.
Mr. Sibley proved the damage done to the gig.
Mr. Simort said that he could not call the veterinary
surgeon, as he was out of town.
The UNDER-SHERIFF said the physic was worth no-
thing, for the poor horse died. That part of the claim,
therefore, could not be made out.
The jury gave a verdict for 18/. ss.

knife.
The prisoner said that he was at the time in a state
of insensibility from drink, and knew nothing at all
about the matter. Ho was an able seaman, and had a
good character.
The LORD MAYOR—You can bring your witnesses as
to character to the Central Criminal Court. You are
committed for trial.

BOW-STREET.
Margaret Howe, who described herself a " Congreve
!patch seller," was charged before Mr. Hall with
stealing a shawl, value ls., the property of Mary Ann
O'Bryan.
The prosecutrix stated that she and her husband slept
last night at a lodging-house in Wild-street, where the
prisoner and her husband also slept. They were in the
same room. That morning witutss missed her shawl,
which she had left on the back of a chair, and as the
prisoner and her husband were in the next bed she im-
mediately suspected them. Their bed, and all the beds
in the room were searched, but the shawl was not found.
A young woman, who slept in the other end of the room,
then proceeded to search the prisoner, and found the
shawl round the prisoner's waist, under her clothes.
Mr., HALL—Why, how many beds are there in this
room ?—The witness replied, there were a young man
and his wife occupied one, the witness and her three
children another, this prisoner and her husband next,
and then two young women.
Mr. HALL—What, all in one room ? Witness—Yes,
your Honour.
The young woman who found the shawl corroborated
this statement.
Mr. HALL--What do you pa for a bed here ? Wit-
y
ness—Sixpence, Sir.
The prisoner said that she (lid not take the shawl.
Mr. HALL—The shawl was found on you and you
have not accounted for your possession of it. It is quite
clear that you have stolen it. I will send you to prison
for fifteen days for having it in your possession, and not
being able to give any account of it.
MARLBOROUGH-STREET.
Mr. Edward John Kinnersley Baker, of 52, Park-
street, Grosvenor-square, was summoned before Mr.
Hardwick for having unlawfully assaulted a young me-
dical gentleman, named William Fenton, living at 29,
Sale-street, Edgeware-road.
The complainant said he was walking in Burlington-
street on Saturday last, when the defendant crossed over
the street on perceiving him, and, on coming up to him,
immediately struck him on the face and grappled with
him. Complainant struggled with the defendant, and
both fell on the pavement together. The defendant left
him, uttering threats of future violence. Complainant
had more than once been attached by the defendant in a
similar way, and so persevering was he in his violence
that complainant went about the streets in constant
fear. Complainant added, by way of explanation, that
the assault had its origin in someld he family
plained matters, which,
if necessary, he was willing
sh
Mr. HAnnwicK asked the defendant to explain his
ou ex.
conduct? Defendant—This is only an ipse di.rit state-

THE QUEEN V. VICKERY.
Mr. PARRLEY moved for a rule to show cause why
an attachment should not issue against a gentleman
named Vickery, an inhabitant of the county of Somerset,
who had been summoned to give evidence as to the settle-
ment of a pauper, but declined, as it would be against his
own interest and that of his parish. A subpcena, was
obtained from the Crown- office, but as Mr. Vickery
persisted in his refusal the present cause was adopted.
Rule nisi granted.

COURT OF EXCHEQUER, Nov. 12
GRAHAM V. STRADANLEN.

Mr. CRAMPTON moved in this case for a new rule to
show cause why the defendant, who was at present under
arrest, should not be discharged out of custody.
It appeared that the defendant was a trader and sub-
ject of Austri ', and that. ho carried on business, in
conjunction with several others, as a merchant at
Smyrna. In the course of his speculations defendant
was unfortunate, and was eventually made a bankrupt,
and the whole of his property was in conse-
quence seized by the Austrian Consul under the
945:h section of the penal code of Austria.
It was now contended by Mr. Crampton that these pro-
ceedings were illegal. The defendant arrived in this
country in order to take refuge from the persecutions to
which he was subjected. In the month of August in
the present year, an advertisement appeared in the
Times newspaper calling upon defendant to appear be-
fore the Austrian Consul, and also atlthorising his
apprehension ; he was accordingly arrested, and
had since that period been held in custody. De-
fendant made application to Mr. Baron Pls.tt at chambers
for his release upon the ground that he was under the
protcction of the laws of this country. On the other
side
ic,anv se ieau theetw contendedanaccoauonfth
r 3
t.is in
oi eo,tfirhdiacettri
conflicting
to e d e te ndunt intended to
declined to interfere in the matter, evidence
aaad recommended
evadehismrc. Baron reditors.ln
:Platt
an application to %he full Court. Mr. Crampton was

COURT OF BANKRUPTCY' Nov. 12.
(Before Mr. Commissioner Everls.)
IN RE GOWER.—PRIVILEGE OF HER MAJESTY'S
SERVANTS.
In this case, which was under the Small Debts Act,
the defendant was summoned to show cause why he did
not pay a judgment debt of 51. 183. recovered against
him in the Court of Exchequer.
Mr. Maynard appeared as counsel on the last occa-
sion to dispute the jurisdiction of the Court, the de-
fendant being a Groom of her Majesty's Household at
Windsor.
The Learned COMMISSIONER then intimated his
opinion that no privilege could be pleaded against the
jurisdiction of the Court, and adjourned the case in order
to give the defendant an opportunity of appearing
this day.
The case having been called on, the defendant did not
appear.
His Ho:4(qm then proceeded to recapitulate the pro-
ceedings, and held that the Learned Counsel who ap-
peared for the defendant, under the instructions of her
Majesty's Master of the Horse, had not offered any ex-
cuse, but merely pleadQd that the Court had no jurisdic-
tion, he (the Learned Counsel) considered the defendant
to be guilty of contempt, and should accordingly issue a
warrant against him. If such a plea were admitted

THE SUN, LONDON; FRIDAY MORNING, NOVEMBER 13, 1846.

ent, and therefore it appears to me that there is no
necessity for making any defence to it.
Mr. ITA7Dwici.;.—l. totally differ from you, and I call

OA N"111 li,r :oar ,R:ik:•ia,
Deiendant—W, then I shall state the reason why I
assaulted the complainant. The complainant persists in*
carrying on a clandestine correspondence with my sister,
and, although all the family are-averse to any acquaint-
ance .with him, he will persevere in his clandestine
tneetings with my sister. I wish first to ask him who
was in his company when I assaulted him on Saturday?
Complainant—Your sister was with me; but I deny I
keep up a clandestine correspondence with the lady. I
have the sanction of her father for my attentions, al-
though I admit other branches of the family are not so
favourably disposed towards me.
Mr. HARDWICK—Do you mean to say you are pay-
ing your addresses to the defendant's sister? Complain-
-1 ant—Yes, with the sanction of her father. The objec-
tion to my attentions has nothing personal to myself in
it. Some part :of :the family are opposed to my suit
because they are of opinion my circumstances are not
sufficiently flourishing to render my proposals ad-

rumed I

vantageous.
Defendant—l deny that the complainant has the
sanction of any part of my family for his clandestine
correspondence with my sister. My father is here to
prove he never sanctioned his addresses. So far from
that being the case, my father told me, as the defendant
continued to persevere in his pretensions to my sister, to
take any steps I thought most likely to rid the family of
his annoyance.
Mr. HARDWICK—YOU may entertain objections to the
complainant's acquaintance with your sister, and your
family may join with you in your opinion, but you must
not attempt to put your views in force by violence to-
wards the complainant whenever you happen to meet
him in the public street. You must find bail—two
sureties in '251. each, and yourself in 501.
Defendant—Will not my solemn promise to abstain
from violence satisfy the Court ?
Mr. HARDWICK—IL will not satisfy the complainant,
and therefore you must find bail.
Charles Crowley was brought up this morning charged
with taking a purse containing 25 sovereigns from John
Stead, engineer, Durham.
The complainant, who lodges in Bond-street, Oxford-
street, went into a dram shop at the corner of Bird-street
on Wednesday night, where he saw the prisoner, with two
or three more, drinking at the bar. He called for a glass,
and took out his purse to pay for it, but the defendant
caught hold of the purse, which he snatched out of his
fingers and handed to one of his accomplices. Com-
plainant immediately seized him and gave him into
custody.
The defendant denied having had anything to do with
the purse.
Police-constable 33 D said he had taken the defendant
into custody that morning.
Mr. HARDWICKE—Was the man not taken into cus-
tody at the time?—The police constable said the pri-
soner was taken to the station-house at half-past eight
last night, but the complainant would not charge him,
and he was set at liberty. He met the complainant
again that morning between two and three o'clock, and
asked him if he would know the man who had taken
his purse. The complainant, who was then sober, said
he would though he were among a thousand. The con-
stable, therefore, took him to a coffee-house, 264,
Oxford-street, where there were between thirty and
forty persons in the room, and the complainant pointed
out Crowley as the man who took away his purse.
John Green, an engineer, who was not sworn to
day, said he heard the man Crowley say in the coffee-
house that it was another man who had the purse, and
not he.
The defendant said he was a plasterer by trade.
The police constable—But has not worked for several
years as a plasterer. The purse has not been found.
Mr. HARDWICK remanded the prisoner for a week.
Campbell Goldschmid was charged with assaulting
Edmund Carey, a police-constable, this morning, in
Regent-street.
Edmund Carey, Tothill-street, Westminster, said he
was passing up Regent-street that morning, at one
o'clock, and the defendant, the worse for liquor, was
coming down in the company of thi ce ladies. One of
the ladies laid hold of complainant by the coat, but on
his advising her to let him alone, the defendant imme-
diately ordered him to be off or he would give him some-
thing for himself. Complainant in answer asked him
" what ship ?" The other then threw off his coat, fol
lowed him into a doorway, struck him several severa
blows about the eyes, and kicked him out into the middle
of the road.
Police-constable C 96, said he heard the cries of
" murder," and went up and found the complainant
bleeding profusely at the nose, and swollen about the
face. The complainant gave the defendant into custody
for assaulting him. The defendant requested time to
put on his coat, which he allowed him, but as he made
no effort to do so he collared him. The defendant
escaped and ran a few yards, and when caught again
struck him.
The defendant said the complainant gave him provo-
cation, but notwithstanding that, had he seen he was so
miserable a wretch he would not have struck him.
Mr. HARDWICKE—What is your position ? The de-
fendant—A chief officer on board an East Indiaman.
Mr. HARDWICKE said he could not suppose that the
assault on the first complainant had been committed
without provocation, but to strike at all, unless in self-
defence, and to strike such a man as the complainant,
was a serious offence. But much more serious than the
other, was the assault which he had committed on the
constable, while in the execution of his duty. He ought
to have known better than resist a person acting under
authority, whether on sea or land. He must pay forty
shillings for the first assault, and 31. for the secund, or
go to the House of Correction for six weeks.
CLERK.ENWELL.

James Judd, a young man of very respectable ap-
pearance, was placed at the bar before Mr. Greenwood
charged with stealing 130 sovereigns, the property of
Charles Marlborough.
The prosecutor said that he and the prisoner resided
at No. 3, Woodbridge-street, Cleikenwell-green, and
occupied the same sleeping-room. He (witness) had
130/. in sovereigns and half-sovereigns in his box in the
bedroom, which latter he always kept locked, and on
coming home on Wednesday night he found that his box
haci been forced open, and the money, which he kept in two
bags and a purse, taken away. The prisoner had also
two bc,xes in the room, both of which wore broken open.
and a portion of the contents of one strewn about the
floor. Hearing that the prisoner had gone out in the
evening to a coffee-house, he sent for him, and upon his
return he (the prisoner) said, "Oh! I have been robbed
myself, too ; my watch, coat, two waistcoats, and two
pair of trousers, have been taken away by the thieves."
The prisoner had latterly been in distressed circum-
stances,
and the witness had supported him for nearly
two years.
Inspector Penny, of the G division stated that, owing
to the latter circumstance, and the fact that the prisoner
bad on Wednesday been seen with 40/., and that he bought
some new dresses for a stylish-looking female, in
Theobald's-road, a strict watch was kept upon him by
four constables who lodged in the house. On searching
him, 40/. in sovereigns and half sovereigns were found,
and amongst the latter was one of a peculiar descrip•
tion, which the prosecutor identified as having been
amongst those in his box., Further search was then
made, and the policeman found the trousers and coat
and waistcoat, which the prisoner pretended had been
stolen from him, concealed under the roof of the house,
and the watch was found at his sister's.
The prisoner said the money was his own, and that
he had earned it while in the service of a drysalter in
the City.
Inspector Penny said they had not as yet succeeded
in tracing the balance of the money stolen, and requested
that the case might be adjourned for a short time.
Mr. GREENWOOD said he would give the police until
this day week to make further inquiries, and the pri-
soner was accordingly remanded to that day.
SOUTHWARK.
Thomas Lucy, a cab-driver, was charged with furiously
driving and cruelly flogging his horse.
A policeman of the Dover Railway Company stated
that continual complaints were made, owing to the mis-
conduct of the cab-drivers in the habit of plying at the
terminus. On this occasion the defendant drove up
rapidly at the moment of the arrival, of the Dover train,
and absolutely endangered the livei of the passengers,
on their alighting and proceeding to leave the terminus.
That in his anxiety to procure a job he was quite care-
less as to the result of his furious driving, and when re-
monstrated with only made use of abusive language.
The defendant said he only did as others did to get a
fare, and that the railway policeman had a spite against
him for not treating him to gin.
Mr. SECHER said it was behefical to the public that
persons such as the defendant should be punished for the
reckless manner in which they, endeavoured to obtain
fares at railway stations. He should inflict a penalty of
403. on defendant, and at the same time he was desirous
that it should go forth to other cab-drivers frequenting
the various termini, that on all occasions when they
misconducted themselves in a similar manner, punish-
ment would be awarded.
THAMES.

John Middleton, a combmaker by trade, and who
resides at No. 22, Philip-street, St.George's-in-the-East,
vs as charged with assaulting his wife, Mary Middleton,
in the following brutal and unmanly manner:—
The complainant, who appeared in an extremely deli-
cate state of health, and whose head, neck, face, and
jaws were all over discoloured, with marks, as if from
recent violence, stated, that on the night of Tuesday, the
31 instant, sho returned home with her husband after
having been out for a night's amusement. She knocked
at the door a little more loudly than usual, upon which
he said, " What is that• for?" and instantly struck her
to the ground. When she got up they went into their
own apartment, and her husband having locked the
door, renewed the attack upon her. lle first dealt her
a heavy blow on the face, which stretched her on the
floor almost senseless, and whilst down he seized her by
the hair and dashed her head against the ground several
times. Not satisfied with this, he fell to kicking her on
the head, face, and arms, while she screamed out
" murder" as loudly as she could. She perceived that
she had four wounds upon the head, from which the
blood flowed profusely. The police hearing her cries
came to her assistance, when a surgeon was sent for, and
after that she remembered nothing more until she found
herself in her bed.
Police-constable Thorogood, K 340, hearing cries of
distress, went to the prisoner's house, and, having
knocked, Middleton came 'to the door. When ques-
tioned as to the doleful cries, he said some words had
occurred between him and his wife, whereupon she struck
him several times ; that he then kt ocked her down, and
he further admitted that he had kicked and beaten her
with the poker. On entering the place,
accompanied by
a brother constable, he found complainant lying sense-
less in the middle of the floor, in the midst of a pool of
blood, and thereupon instantly sent for a surgeon, who
was in prompt attendance, and dressed her wounds.
Police-constable Rowbury, K 347, deposed to the same
effect, and added that whilst ho (witness) was outside

A— D )
the door he heard the prisoner say "You —, I'll shdw MARKET NEWTS -17-6S TER
you • Lanenshire.'" A student of the London nirs rTr7-'

morning of ti.

three severe wounds on her tit ad, and a 'fourth on her
forehead. She seemed to have been severely injured,
and terribly bruised and beaten about the head, arms,
and neck. She was for a considerable time in a dangerous
state, and had been confined to her bed up to Sunday
last. The it...juries which presented themselves might
have been caused by kicks from -a heavy shoe, or from
some blunt instrument. _ _

, • ~.e the 2-,encral eletnitn.; was steac:.
ROMFORD,
ratts. i;ee;, twin .25 10d to 4s; Notion. 3, t°
4(1; Veal, 3a Sd to 43 4d ; and Pork, ►4s to 4s 6d per Slbs.,
a ready sale at higher rates. Otherwise the demand iiri
Nov. 11.—Prime _Beasts and Sheep cominandeti
tolerably steady. Beef. from 2s 10d to 4s; Mutton, 30'.
pcearlf,Bllh6sl.to
187ecakelhin.g Calves, _
to 5s 6d ; Veal, 3s 8d Co 4s 4d ; and Pork, 4s to 4s Gd l''',
store Pigs, 16s to 19s ; and Milch Cows, with their small
lied With
HAILSHAM, Nov. 11.--Our market was fairly stIPP
fat stock to-day, yet the demand was firm at full poceos.
Beef, from 3s 4d to 4s 2d ; Mutton, 4s to 5s 6d; Veal'
18s to 29s ; quarter-ot
to 4s Gd ; and Pork, 3s 10d to 4s 4d per Sibs.
ARUNDEL, Nov. 10.— Beef, from 3s 6d to 4s 2d ; 31atovt,
4s to 50 4d ; Veal, 4s to 4s 4d ; and Pork, 3s 8d to 434 d Per
Sibs. A moderate
Nov
and a ready sale. na
CmcnEsrEß, Nov. I I.—We had a very steady derr:34d
at cull prices. Beef, from 2s 101 to 4s 2d ; Blutton, '' 4d
to 5s 6d; Veal, $s 10d to 45 4d ; and Pork, 3s
10d to 44tere
per Blbs. Suckling Calves, 180 to 30s; quarter-old, red,
Pigs, Ns to 18s; and Milch Cows, with their su33l, '
161 to 18/ each.
renrcivGAlNS AND I.z.a.nrws.al,l-i• II cup-
We had a very steady tract: here, and prices were 'o'., sd;
ported. Beef, from 2s .8d to 3s 81 9;
Motto°,
Veal 3s 8d to 4a 61; and Pork, 3s 4,1 to 4s 8d per ElJs 0
the carcase. 3s 8d to ~

In answer to the Magistrate, as to whether any instru-
ment had been used by the prisoner, the prosecutrix said
that she believed such was the case, but could not say
what the instrument was.

The prisoner, in his defence, endeavoured to throw the
whole blame upon his wife, who he said was a woman of
very violent temper, and that being in liquor at the
time she struck him several blows. This conduct irri-
tated him, and he certainly struck her in return, but he
strenuously denied having admitted to the Constable that
he had kicked her or used a poker.

He was committed to Newgate to take his trial for felo
niousiy wounding.

EXTRAORDINARY ROBBERY.

Among the passengers in the train from Southampton
which arrived at Nine Elms on the 27th ult., was a

sky wrik=nvicia
Glover data
Meadow Hay, 21 ils to 31 1g ~s ; A
31 8s to 41 16s; any. Straw, it 9s to 1112 s per loa `' ,
average supply, and a heavy don of r ditto,
CUMBERLAND.—Meadow Hay, 2/ lOs to 41; Cl°.fe rrodo
Si 5s to 4/ 15s ; and Straw, 1/ 103 to 1/ 13s per load
steady, at full prices. i 16g; Clorleff
WIELTECHAPEL.—Meadow Hay, 21 5s to 3, • a • say
ditto. 318 s to 51; and Straw, 118 s to 11 125 per loau.
good, and trade dull.
—......-------2

young Frenchwoman, fashionably dressed, and of sin-
gularly attractive appearance, who, on alighting, re-
quested to be directed to some hotel where she could
reside for a few days. The attendants at the station
accordingly conducted her to Mr. Howse's Railway
Hotel, near the terminus, where she took up her abode,
giving her name as Mdlle. Malvina Florentine de San-
marez. Mademoiselle spoke English tolerably well, and
stated that she had arrived from Jersey on her way to
Paris, but intended first to see London sights, the.
theatres, &c. Before long she had established herself
on the most friendly footing with Mr. Howse and his
family, going out almost every evening, accompanied by
one or other of its members, to some place of amuse-
ment. A day or two after her arrival she consigned a
heavy bag full of sovereigns to the landlord's keeping
for safety ; and, in answer to his questions respecting
her connexions, represented her mother as being a lady
in Paris, and herself somewhat self•willed and fond of
amusement. _ _

For the Week ended Nov. 12, 1846,
COTtN AVERAGES. 00 08
GENERAL AVERAGE PRICES OF BRlTlSlzeturo of to
Inspectors in the different Cities and TOWAS in EeglAi
Per- Imperial Quarter. s. °lli
... sEA ~ 505 a
WIILAT. 111.101LEY.1 OATS. 1 AY.: , ,65 Du 1g v"
PRICE .. 162; 3(1 44s 3d 273 3d 413 a. -',,,, Od -
DITTY . •• A
--s NI 2s Od Is 6d 2s Od -
mad u front the
nd od so,

,a----------"-'-"'----"- PjC i) .C"9' t'
WORKS by ROBERT J. CULTERWELL. A':- • lienes
One Shilling each, by post One and bia .i t
D 1
1.
ON SINGLE And MAR 11. T D "
(An Original Medical History.)
atet--eleir
. CONTENTS: / 'tett' ' I.oo'
:17:0111
li‘liiiie.rt.:
tiies___ AnalysisMatches—Curiosities
ui of
tuffrifto.hessnei_ue
,Aei
snfreoleo: tl
el i; eEn :10yr CG onven t 1 o ri
direction—Marital Anticipations °nsaand Resklities-I,sawsi°,l;
On CHASTIIITTgYruw estation—larriaeo;4o
ac. Sec.
(An Essay for 18400
"Of human ills and frailties discourse,
_.,,,d,
Those taught by nature, and by art acciclint..o,
Of griefs conceal'd, and slisappointine . ta_l'd`"oge,
aconnustayi.tsthr:l.ll,Felrisse:Tr:3l:4.....Lreeodsic:s i„pd,
Which young and gentle, the matur a '''''
The lonely and the mated—all sustar• ~
In kindly spirit, herein counsel's giv 11;5
, ~ to
darn,
How health, how hope, how kaePat-
Alta)
WHAT to EAT, DRINK, and , .ofs. icell°b.
With Diet Tables for all CornTal-trameil m, ail e
Contents :—How to ensure perfeet dieeglen, lid. lbs 0
glioe:lisplyneridgiohedlit'cosafrelies;tee,:allnoctltoteedathr
thehmeinaosdan,t Asa.
hdattaeredconext:sttitebdiccifool'eichloe;foriisrt
servance of the instructions herein ckintainec:
the greatest amount of physical happiness, and re
bat 0.
k, 0 0
" How we should live—what eat, what drind, ea, gbjertge:
To reach in health full threescore years a''.,,, upon 5i 1010
very
interesting little volumes, although irarbe'toun.ong.o
vsturrYableelliacandte import,
as their titles imply, utters eYliorra'Turl'
general utility, for they tell ef ni
.01,0 iu
cd tat
tire ab etk understand ought to know, but „,teulgat .„,of
these enlightened times. except that elnalltY '"-,. .trill'iot
questionab • hannels, is at a very terrible discollt bijd!:, it 0 ~„
In the exposition hereby offered of the till nc: or ralTi,elsto
nature, c 1 hurean disappointments and tkeir waYi.jer ea,' 00 0,
contended that every reader shall become las Itlf, ted al°o 01"4,
any more than their own lawyer, laut it is ins':ol,atia-,'l aeto,
should know the simple principles of our curn, ni,7,eir sev.errnsli,,Y,' 00
whereby our existence and the issue thereof In i'''s in •,ties'`,;
states depend, the duties that are expected °„.bieti 1./1; to re'l'..eL
capacities in the family circle, and the terms on ciita lial; troPA-0,0
happiness of the present and future race Of °UP'-fltitll/111.Jj 10,510
By such knowledge, and which 15 berein ,g, id; to tly tas;
health will be found to be in *our own ceP, Dere°',,ur Oi` so
within the atta!nment of all ; by the availitiet.„ ea ~Ke lof
our duty to ourselves, we secure the like advein'"
fa &ties, a,idy
lot
betooenfebs.ailslotlevktned•,tawtnoditthflhne:iletsllaumeynbewayratttheoefheepulalerttiti,ive,catitthiooein.infaifnsdcbases't;:ceiloa).olls:sta:::oo4l,
of God's creations. ~,,, ef h pea-, 6
The author's justification for this seeming enlcii.tet De: OP
ingS, and the avowal of their integrqiiitally otte,PtilirPi: ;urearsift.t.
ill, !loci'
by their perusal—his accredited
topics broached involve his legitimate studY and,,Pke ; ,go
.gog.,
To be had of Sherwood, 23, Paternoster-r- 3v, (ler-or
Fleet-street; Hannay, 63, Oxford- street ; Msintl:street 0 ne,
direct from the Author, 11, Argyle-place, 11...,egepn peftl; till
Great Marlborough-street), who may be ad"se-rd 64-
matters daily till Three, and in the Evenings -°lll

-----....
On Saturday evening last she went to Astley's
Theatre, and prior to her going produced a cheque on
the Fareham bank for 991. 135., the name of the drawer
being Purkiss, which she requested Mr. Howse to get
cashed. Mr. Howse said the readiest mode would be to
give it to one of the railway guards, who would present
it at the bank. This proposition did not accord with
Mdlle. de Saumarez's views, and she replaced the
cheque in her pocket, saying that a day or two hence
would do. _ _ . .

-----
About this time it was discovered that a cash box,
containing upwards of 1501. in gold, two double sovereigns
and a cheque for 991. 133., had been stolen from the
house of a ship-builder living at Fareham. A reward of
201. was offered in consequence, and Mr. Gow, the super-
intendent of the Hants county constabulary, having ob
tained a clue to the probable retreat of the depredator,
proceeded to London on Monday, and accompanied by
the guard of the train that had brought Mdlle. de San-
marez to town, went to the hotel, and on seeing her took
her into custody. The prisoner threw herself upon her
knees, and gave the following extraordinary statement:—
That a few weeks since a gentleman brought her to Eng-
land, and after remaining with him for a few days, left
her at Gospert, where she obtained apartments at a
boarding-house. The family with whom she lodged
showed her many kindnesses, and she was introduced
to their cousin, who resided at Fareham. There she
remained a week on a visit, and during that time saw the
mother of her friend's cousin give him 50 sovereigns
from a cash-box, which she afterwards deposited between
the sacking and the bed of a bedstead. Sl:e went to
Southampton, where she purchased a cash-box resem-
bling the one she had seen; and returning with it, corn-
plained'of her head aching, and requested permission to
lie down for an hour before she left for Gosport. She
then went to the room where the cash-box was deposited,
And substituting the empty box for the full one, suc-
ceeded in leaving the house without exciting any sus-
picion. She then went 'direct to the railway station,
and, choosing a carriage in which there ens no other
passenger, she broke open the box, and, having ab-
stracted the contents, threw the box out of the window.
She said she had felt miserable ever since, and inclined
to give herself up to justice. Upon beir:g searched. the
cheque and two double sovereigns were found upon her;
and Mr. Howse, upon opening the bag, discovered it to
contain 146/. in sovereigns. The money was given up
to the superintendent, who started with the prisoner the
same night for Fareham. On Tuesday she was taken
before a magistrate, and remanded for the attendance of
witnesses from London.

I°oll
ra.% OF 09' sOC.
ON THE SECRET INFIRMITIES 4,1., .6
MATURITY. vi"Op".4o,°,`iti•w'
WITH TWENTY-FIVE COLOUR-Dv v-0,04,
Jest published, Twentieth Thousand, in oa -6d•
Tre
2s. 64., or post paid, to any address, for os• ,
„Ad , to,
direct from the Author's residence. Meal's? #e4.
CI ELF. PRESERVATION. : A ,00rgoit,;
A of I° the ',i,
LY on the Secret Infirmities and Disorders
.00 .1100,, 00 of
Illustrated with Tweaty-five Coloured Fit; play:ooV, '4OO
Physiology, and Diseases of the Urinary an;fortiloteopoi
explaining their various structures, uses, er'litAri 1'; j
the injuries that are produced in them, b.r
excesses. With Practical Observations on ..., Tsui
Debility, Local and Constitutional Weakness' OEO>foff,
the Urethra. S. n; 000,.
By SAMUEL LA'MERT, are, bli„eje
9, Bedford-street, Bedford-sq,,o
Matriculated Member of the 'University si 4;cletY, 0,4
Member of the London Hospital Medical /
Apothecaries' Hall, London, c., e. ,c nits 111%i"?
CONTENT&S OF Sz
THE TATA-IS:wit eve ootilioe3
CLUTTER 1: On the Philosophy of MarringAirprocT tlO,cl,L
and Obligations, and on Infelicitous and •;,ecifiair'n‘ 1,4
CLUTTER 5. On the Anatomy and PhYs'°,;'-elci, l'ltar'44°",4lo;
Organs, their functions, structures, and secretion th.Ae- o.lo;filiAi
Mental and Physical Power are dependant nOoriee'd
—CLUTTER 3. On Solitary Habits; yes' of pd
Animal Economy ; the concealed cause it '-',;71 ral •00 wer,
of the Stomach, Lungs, and Brain, and g",•2te Pifer-1104
Mental Faculties. CHAPTER 4. On the Set-40- on,
and Maturity, and the Treatment of Nervo,„,-411,4,
Mental Debility, and Premature 610.
the Disorder' arising from tudisenminn'erretlir' 4,11/,„4
Gleet, Strictuies, and ether Diseases of the A 1010,P, eit'
sroo' 1g Orr Id/
REVIEWS Or TinZ wOr Die 10
"The author of this singular and talente
aoijersotiloos
fled medical man, who has evidently 1101441 g frceil°,olo4,lo,.
the trr ltinent of: the various disorders a1....AA-is sle,oet, its
frailties of early indiscretion. The engra!„.-04 eSe`ncd.n.
ditlen, by demonstrating the consequenee'turit),",d AP' 4; if,
act as a salutary warning to youth and 111,,Ad to, ''"'" _41.1ee41;
many questions may be satisfactorily reP' bis ir,s, lel
peal, eves to the most confidential friend'
he 100 Atflailt'o,ll7o
•Published by the Author, and may - rota;' At; •
from Kent and RicharcD, 32, Paternoster-_. •feew ,
Oxford-street, Starie, Tichborne-street $l3 01°
P.l7'
Leadenhall-street, London; Newton, 16' till 0 rye
and by all Booksellers. Imo
.0c; is, 0
At Home for Consultation daily, fro
finely reollf,o 4
Five till Eight ; and all letters inunediatprfraTil 001,
the fee of IL, for advice. &e.-9 BEDFa" 01 i
SQUARE, LONTifr4 e ieAO'
I
• t 011 / fl 4
A POPULAR TREATISE on the 11E- ,/co • pest
11,0
1 00.
of the BODILY . Free • $ 4 .
ale fe•
NINETEETH EDITION, price 25. do, e
Envelope)
THE SILENT FRIEND' c(1:5,,t tei
Sion.
auTohnseythmtearnitooesnfsuislo
ceec„rtseap
ror
codf
fyildt
yiuviegePneeti
epitt.lP
testa e130,1'.
ijoif7cte::ti hclfLect
deoiety
graving! ; followed by observations ts,.'.l-' Inion.',4 At ,4i, I:3 0
m
PERRY and Co., Consulting Surgeons, °„,
Published by the Authors, and aY oor'so,l, A•cer
Sold by Strange, No. Si, Paternoster •rowAs'igial,iers• ot nit
street ; Purkis, Compton-street, Soho ;
street, and 37, Ro3 al Exchange ; and 51"/ Addres tlir°
Part I. of this Work is particularlY, tiorenileA, eel!,
prevented from forming a Matrimonial f'4,o syfitinFes' 01,
fain disqualifications, and will be folin".,, (orb et
t
the means of perfect and secret ruepsotonraotioi.s,:ot,
oinifol :reedy;
Part 11. treats perspicuously
in their primary or secondary state, 3rlS.glrete°
how numbers who neglect to obtain efferAig• „lan:oPd " De.
upon themselves years of miserY and CU 10 ,
The CORDIAL BALM OF sYRIAC watt
.0 Ds Aop 0
the cure of nervous and sexual debilitl.!,:nolpi,sin. ,A fo'
10
renness, loss of appetite, indigestion, CO,rico_:. 4.
_A 00 1011 t,
ties arising from venereal excesses, ea:, e susonZsslo" 000", a
tie. The Five-pound cases may be iniuni,-v ff, the foe, erne
The CONCENTRATED DETEII' 1, pro Pro
and on
he -
syphilitic remedy fir searching out t. frow xis, 4iP
hereal contamination, scurvy, blotche. _riniog, Ana 0
ulcerations, and those painful affections ~,00 al. o,i 4I
ruPP 0. ico
' rnent, secondary symptoms, and A- e pril.r o,tr.
and 335. per bottle. et
PERE Y'S PURIFYING SPEL,..,AAAI re „iatlle ceiatj
and Ils. per box, are the mostwea.ded'ei, Ske', ate delD11:11, J05t0,, 9
flammation, irritation, of the fall At ao
business.
Consultation fee, if by Letter, AtteTtrifrAiloc%le, cn
40
eessary. Messrs. Perry are in
19, Berners-street, Oxford-street, '4
000° Of id
five till eight; and on Sundays from al 04001, tia yre'
$
Olden h
orresP er
C for wbic
ORNAMENTAL TILES. of tie, ,to
_,eo ogler
Builder describes a new speelesh are a
ot,rvow „r
varioushn sbe e takennadvan out,tages
o over
rnedraa
nv‘eticlipiatiodfvfirivaotibsi
tieotafolotah.l.syrerbriiiii:trioccpa
pearance of their arren
in a
the leaf of the oak, &C. an eq o • ifig
rovides d coos' art.( tlf
vature of surfaco, which p ve tiAl .0g1!
wwhatileer
iotvneorteaoenhlytiplree,
vthenetcsolnecaakair:eibhortlogieLftroeq,,o,sle:e4o,
cr capillary attraction (an ev ccurrel3,i,ble 'esiv
aanon ° • sot t 144' ,et
observed, yet of very co ,\ is
_soil voo
overlapping of flat surracesi_ As or of
s wort' of 015 ,ct 45.
fortunes to which the fillet vAtitp str ,01
1 TOE cure See ,A 4
[ADVERTISEMENT.
,tuts
led. ep. 411.
, AND HoLLOWAY'S PILLS:--An bad fecoDorit!o, yotl sior P
medicine, after every otb?' Inc,,ainessiso, Acqunitccr rn0,',,41;
lordship's letter, dated / peg win al„„,e is?'„oc,fo
"To Professor Hollwy, ,4,' disorder At 110'00 Po Woo; Pi
pill') have effected a cure offs menitY, Aot ,fpc (al
tof the _no) Of 0,1
which all the most eminen ,0 effect
orneg .
Continent, had not been able woe. ,tni,j1.7100.1
Carlsbad or Marienbad.—(zdee ifor or
Plsotiirtvla
ands
5 will.o.CiUnd rdmi anyatl)
mdaiestdie acrsienr
oeoffaysesulli_ e 011rorg liout

On the 9th inst., _
--- cacti.
NIETO* vent•gg 3Lit
d 0"
C. Stevens, of a son• taa
gar )10'
On the 9th inst., the -wife of John
Esq.,
ofa daughter. foliagi°l3' 1,11
terrace, _.0,,
On the 10th inst., at Compton' je-r
S. Torr, ef a son. IVesr' "5. 1-1°
treet to'
On the 10th inst., at Conduit-s f 0
William Thompson, of a daughter.
in IC-ing-street, C 0 rive
Camberwell, of a daughter.
On the 10th inst., Niro. William Sliirrosc, 0

+cry
MARATED. %chit toe
On the 4th inst., at the parish rbureor,!irasitigto.v_og r-
secOono
second
hel
daughtero in
os
ft.
the Rev. J. "Morehead, Rector SIOOP
Alicia, eldest daughter of the late Mai T
Cavalry. °{A 0,
ni 0, Y-
;lite late Lo n
ds
rTl,llllcebil3rldar,k. jervo

____ _____ ocll
T re"l,
NED.
KOAnrntholed7, thiliteinls9t.,thaft,,aWnreo:rdsf.ortl, Sarah, sc'''et-ef't •Cjli6l
i'slii
r feet
Mro. On
et,h,rege7rtiho:n;:tgiaitoL.ittle Missenden Abu."
Garthwaite,
int
vh
ae
itel:stlgiedimBl-0., in Upper Parnsburi%ror.telf• i.
Aro. MarYt;ro JO
On the 9th inst., at Dorchester, Peck
40.4). A,
On the 10th inst., at Coombe Lodge' -
On the 10th inst., ttt the Allgel Inn, i'liligt°ll' Y-
'.°.'
13•6'u i
Smith, relict of C. Smith, aged 93..yorphire,e31rrbe O.
On the 10:h inst., at gasbrough,
‘,,, salt. ft
On the 11 th inst., at Charnpion:4gt.
Giy, M.A., Rector of Biliborough, 0-

I
----
fit 01'1).,°,41trigivticli„411;13:+ircl:14.41
isbed
1,0114011; miedfr
su„ °owe,
„I-, glow -
St, awl, Printer, -In tl3e v
of the Savoi,
vember 13„ 18,16,

all