The Sun.
London, England, 1846-12-09 00:00:00

,GALWAY, DEC. 4.—Arrd. Maria, Winter, Quebec. 6th,
,
Ale Hedge, Al.‘Donough, ditto.
LEITH RoAns, DEc. 6.—Arrd. Francis Ann, Batavia.
RULL, DEC. B.—Wind northerly, light.—Sid. St. George,
°ter•henson, Cape of Good Hope.
••s IiARAVICII, DEC. B.—Wind E.N.E.—Arrd. Richard and
arah, Scott, Woodbridge, for Newcastle, with damage, hav-
ing been in contact with a light brig.
FAYEESILVSL DEC. 7.—The Brothers, Samuel, of London,
na contact on the sth ua inst. in the Creek, with the Sally,
rns, of Neweastle, and sank. She has since been raised ;
considerably damaged.
AI,EHDEEN, DEC. s.—The Antelope, Donald, from Sunder-
d, which struck on the North Pier 22d ult., and sunk,
ma! been raised and hauled up.
w,eck.AIAEGATE, DEC. B.—The St. Jean, Butez, from London,Wb
got on the main and bilged yesterday, is a complete
wr
oPLYMOUTH, DEC. B.—The St. George, Hernaman, ftom
idtleY, New South Wales, arrived here to-day, with part
cargo thrown overboard, quarter gallery carried away, and
fern timber transom started.

:ARKET NEWS.-(THIS DAY.)

`'"RN EXCHANGE-WEDNESDA V.
ill Al though the fresh arrivals of English Wheat up to our
_ trket since Monday have been but moderate, we had rather
,e,Lhirge show of samples of that article to-day, owing to
hegich, and the thin attendance of buyers, the trade was
p 047, and prices were with difficulty supported. In free
orel3l % comparatively little was doing, at late rates.
in bond was almost nominal in value. The sale for all
Fhe of Barley was heavy, at Monday's reduced figures.
w Rah trade was slow, at last week's currencies. There
ia‘, a fair business doing in Oats, Beans, and Peas, at pre-
'll3 CllrtelleieS, but Flour was much neglected.
ARRIVALS.
Wheat. f Barley.
1,840 qrs. 3,670 qrs.

~or°fin ......

Oats Flour.
1,420 qrs. I 1,040 sks.

2,360 I --
6,060 -

5,450
Malt. 1,280 qra.
WHITECEAPEL.
We had a very dull trade here, and prices had a down
Wahl
to 4. -vadency. Beef, from 2s 6d to 3s 8d ; Mutton, 3s 4d
81C 8 1,6 d; Veal, 3s 6d to 4s 6d; and Pork, 3s 6d to 4s 8d per
1 the carcase.

PRIVY
COUNCIL—(THIS DAY.)
to. The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council sat again
‘"`Y, in the Council Chamber, Whitehall. The Lords
;attendance were Lord Brougham, Lord Langdale (the
s.4ater of the Rolls), Mr. Baron Parke, Sir Herbert
Pust, the Judge of the Admiralty Court, and the
2,imeellor of the Duchy of Cornwall.
QUEEN'S PROCTOR V. THE SOLICITOR OF THE
DUCHY OF LANCASTER.
to 111,4a SOLICITOR-GENERAL commenced his arguments
1,4"43' in this appeal, following the Queen's Advocate,
14:2"ts heard yesterday. The arguments of the
fl'ed Gentleman occupied the whole of the morning.
ep,i7rd Campbell, the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lan-
: a.dhering to his determination of yesterday, sat
'uottt the bar among her Majesty's counsel.

CRANCERY-(THIS DAY.)

STOCKER V. DAWSON.
e 211.6 arguments in this case, which came before the
liZrft upon appeal from an order of the Master ot the
0418, ere resumed and concluded to-day, Mr. Bethel!,
th. behalf of the appellants, having concluded his reply
4,niorning.
the case, which has already occupied several days,
eta, which has been in this Court for several years,
Me before the Lord Chancellor on appeal from a
eep—tinant of the Master of the Rolls, disallowing ex-
dotra to the Master's report. A short statement
the facts of the case may be thus made :
Of b. and William Stocken had carried on the business
ituk -Low_
"in yrs at Walham Green. In 1820 John died,
tsec,g made a will by which he devised his undivided
Th-o`2 of his interest in the brewery to William Stocken,
esii:l44B,_ Carlton, and Benjamin Dawson, in trust to m-
ew the rents, and apply the same towards the support
Vials„ !en and daughter during their minorities ; and
At" we youngest of them came of age, he devised the
e 0,4! to them in equal shares. The brewery was, ac-
itotlng to the directions in the will, to be valued, and the
the Lto purchase the moiety offered to his brother. If
'seel.:.rother purchased, he was to give satisfactory
the-VY for the payment; if he declined to purchase,
.10f01asiness was to be carried on as it had here-
Irite ° been, for the maintenance of the testator's
Itin;_itad family. The valuation was made, and
Loam, the brother, remained in possession as a
1401 Purchaser, until 1824, when he died, having
,keei, a will by which he gave his son, Oliver
ail den' one of the defendants, the whole of
Steeirtterest in the property, and appointed Oliver
dill and Benjamin Dawson his executors. That
Drope"," Proved, and Oliver took possession of the
for, 111:1, and carried on the business, as he believed,
tiled cwn benefit. In 1827 the plaintiff, an infant,
velutta bill by his next friend, alleging that no proper
Of°f Itetiii°,a of the property had been made during the life
Stocken, that the defendant had not pro-
la L. 7 °rue the owner of the property, and praying
etoyeZeUnt and a receiver. The cause was heard in
ideele-", be, r, 1830, and a decree made, by which it was
obi, that the interest of -.John Stocken in the
11!!rel;2: was not affected by the valuation or alleged
'VED and a reference was directed to the Master
. to
_
acese-", account of the profits of the brewery which had
_
the diflartip:since the death of John Stocken, and to make all
es allowances. The Master having reported,
toe„,:-'endants took several exceptions to that report ;
ka,i-no these were allowed but the Master of the Rolls
8110,"g decided against the claim of the defendant to any
°fez knee for carrying on the business in the character
elsie:e3tor to his deceased partner, and affirmed the
thee ut the plaintiff to the halt of the profits. The ques
The Were now argued on appeal.
teth.ill'°aD CHANCELLOR, at the conclusion of Mr.
'l4 8 reply to-day, postponed giving judgment.

.ICE-CHANcERY.—(THIS DAY.)
(before the VICE-CHANCELLOR Of ENGLAND.)
FrAcOCK v. HERNOT.
th arguments in this part-beard case were resumed
The mornin, and occupied his Honour the whole day.
ue suit was instituted for the purpose of setting aside a
contract for the purchase by the plaintiff of the stock and
teraises of a toy-shop at West Cowes, in the Isle of
it fight, which the defendant (a druggist there) had, as
Was alleged in the bill, induced the plaintiff to buy
from him. The bill represented that the plaintiff was a
young man of weak intellect, who had been imposed
!Pn by the defendant, and induced to lay out his money
'41`11:11t what might be considered by some persons
re_trumpery concerns of a toy-shop, which the de-
elant had been himself carrying on next door to his
CA:pities shop. On the filii;o• of the bill, an injunction
b
fkicianuee,n‘. applied for and granted, restraining the do-
l• from enforcing payment of the purchase-money
ttle heariag.
SOU_

RT OF REVIEW—(THIS DA )
11* POLLARD V. TAYLOR.
tepres' Was the petition of the plaintiff, who was the
Tata._ entative of the Bradford Banking Company, and
tal lea that a fiat of bankruptcy which had been ob-
tled
,might be superseded.
%,PPeared from the statement
.o.f Mr. SWANSTON,
liii,ll),Peared in support of the petition, that the liabi-
-111,171 the defendant exceeded 1,500 L, of which
dheis
4iale debt amounted to more than half, and the -
4311taia. had made a deed of settlement prior to his
*lliellu!e the fiat in bankruptcy, in. least September,
..
" Was contended, precluded him from receiving
Cjillefit of the act of the Court..
alleged that the
trtht4.°e part of the defendant,
,1111(1th*,t0 the settlement had
. not ditiswehaasrged their duties,
k some of his creditors refused to accede to that
1„.cl settlement so that he had no meaus of protect-
14t1Zeself from utter ruin but by adopting the course
At thqdten•
e conclusion of the arguments,
thetild BRUCE said he would not state what course he
ail he "I‘ave deemed it his duty to pursue
in this case
proper "een satisfied that the fiat was issued wholly
tfhoer
PUrposes. He was satisfied, hofw
!:11V y. 4 net been issued for the benefit o the creditors,
legitimate
144 i et with view to the bankrupt's o
ecla elet' Whatever might be expected twonbe the sue.
elearlsuch a measure as that of the bankrupt's,
had 1!... established by the evidence that thepetff'se.ctitowfohnis.t
ttruerl either effectual) to prevent or materially
tttaoet,„he execution of the trusts. It was
h of no im-
trustees
ksad in all whatever whether or not t
ate tZtill,ses executed their duty diligently:
eaesrftaarinalys
bhlPuetetdaettthsee in its present stage. It was
bank-rept, if there were sucahkemiasn-
415814ictinoaenttna,11/0111d UStif) the course, to m
effects
a b Court to be protected from the
tti,°,ol:llshe' t°
- his Whole experience he was never
iatwwaraes
duty e best of his recollection, whereh.eh
aceeordinogflythe Court to nullify a fiat,
he
do, with costs.
BENCH.—(THIS DAY.)
kr PLIDIMER V. ANDERSON.
tiff• Sergeant
de: 444 1,, ones and Mr. Udale were for the pain-
4,etulantr• Bramwell and Mr. Wordsworth for the
lat:t
gkole 48 an action brought by the plaintiff, Mr. John
aw
tit., to I.P!. the proprietor of the Anchor Brewery, Chet-
A/tod ec°l'er 40/. 13s. 7d. from the defendant, Mr. J.
viierson, who occupies a beer-shop called the
wla7 134 k," in Dervill-street of which
-matl PPrel,„ll€l is the tenant. The defendant entered into
et,
-`_"les in question in the month of Mar
al,t' ue agreeing to pay a rent of 2../.
w;,ll4ra. and that the plaintiff should supply
K.ll tlee‘oi..q_beer and ale. Various payments were made
all 1,64'44 of the commodities supplied, but on b.alanc-
rtlan...itc"ants in May last, the sum for which the
d:lit4lnt",,throught was found. due, and which the d. e-
"tett. ''"ed to pay, pleading that he never was i!
-
he trial 1.
"ad not concluded when our report left.)
t)tr.
-'`'HEQUER.—(THIS DAY.)
Th 6
GILL V. LORD CURZON.
,_ll4l ;Ptia; which was in part heard yesterday, was
-Ititaed--,„ais mornin. After the case had been pro-
w:kite I."lth for sometime,
a•th4-01113 CHIEF BARON intimated, that in consequence
tiltrloa:froo_rde! obtained during the progress of the
tit_"adatit `,1,4 Lord Langdale, by the application of the
e PlaihrTr.the purpose of taxing the bill of costs of
btin 1,-"
ix in the present action, he was not quite
ead;?t that the whole of the proceedings which had
t`,4,attiti7e,n taken in this court should have been dis•
"De 0.14°- It was his opinion that the interpretation
,_-tbestrea to the order of Lord Langdale wes that the
Zgaia:l 0i liability should first be tried, and if decided
to her the
defendant, then the amount of the verdict
Aft4gulated according to the taxation,
'utttter La short discussion, it was arranged that the
140111 to 1,4-"uld be referred to Mr. Willis, with power to
Nis kt,"l3 assistance the services of 0119 o'f the officers of
""%aitteter.