The Sun.
London, England, 1833-07-17 00:00:00

THE CELEBRATED DETERGENT TOOTH AND
GUM TINCTURE, FOR THE IMMEDIATE RE-
LIEF OF TOOTH-ACHE, AND THE EGYP-

TIAN ODONTALGIC POWDER.
MONSIEUR IVIALLAN and SON, Sur-
geon-Dentists, No. 32, GREAT RUSSELL-
STREET, BLOOMSBURY, and No. 9, HALF-MOON-
STREET, PICCADILLY, the sole inventors and pos-
sessors of the well-known MINERAL SUCCEDA •
NEUM for filling DECAYED TEETH, and for their
INCORRODIBLE ARTIFICIAL TEET 11, fixed
without WIRES or other LIGATURES, respectfully
announce to their Patients and the Public, that on ac-
count of the great attention required to their professional
engagements in the Metropolis, they are iuduced to place
in the hands of Medicine Venders generally, throughout
the Kingdom their INVALUABLE DETERGENT
TOOTH and GUM TINCTURE, for the restoration
of diseased Gums to their pristine state of health and
comfort, as well as their inestimable EGYPTIAN
ODONTALGIC POWDER, so much approved by the
Faculty of London and Paris, for cleansing, preser-
ving, and beautifying the Teeth, and imparting
an agreeable odour to the breath ; both these medi-
cinal compounds have, for many years, been acknew-
ledged by the Royal Family and Nobility of England
and France, to be the only preparations which have stood
the test, in preserving and restoring the masticatory organs,
for, independently of their salubrious and beautifying
qualities separately, they impart a firmness and elasticity
to the Gums, and effectually eradicate all mercurial and
other deleterious articles which too often prove the destruc-
tion of a whole set of Teeth. A more succinct account of
the invaluable properties of these inestimable preparations,
are given (to which public attention is more particularly
solicited) with each packet of the Powder and Tincture.
The Detergent Tooth Tincture is sold in Bottles at
4s. 6d. and I ls. each, large Bottles contain three of the
small ones ; and the Egyptian Odontalgie Powder in
Boxes at 4s. 6d. each, duty included.
Sold by appointment by Messrs. Sanger, 150, Oxford-
street ; Smith, 11, Gower-street, North ; J. Pett, 243,
Regent- street ; Nix, Royal Exchange ; R„use, Welling-
ton- street, London Bridge; F. and T. Bailey, 39, Black-
friars-road; Sterling, 86, High street, Wbitechapel ;
Kendall and Son, 447, West, Strand ; Fisher and
Wagstaff, 76, New Bond-street; J. and T. Rigger 65,
Cheapside ; R. Johnson, 68, Cornhill ; Prout, 229,
Strand, near Temple-bar ;W. llolwell, Brunswick-house,
30, Blackmore-street, Borough.
Dental Surgery performed on the Teeth on Messrs. M's
improved principle.
Charges as in Paris.

A WHITE MOLE.—There was caught las
we,k, in the garden of Petkellony, at Muthil, belonging t,
the Right Hon. Lord Willoughby de Eresby's factor,
mole of a pure white colour. This natural curiosity ha,
been sent to Mr. Graham, mole. catcher, in order to be
stuffed for preservation.—Scotsman.
SWORD FISH.—On Monday week, the Ist
current, when the weather was rather stormy, and the sea
a good deal agitated, a fine specimen of this curious fish
was cast ashore about a mile below Southerness. The
body measured seven, and the sword nearly four feet in
length. Scotsman.
THE LATE COLONEL MELLISH'S STUD.
—We remember him with thirty•eight racehorses in train-
ing ; seventeen coach horses, twelve hunters in Leicester-
shire, four chargers at Brigh ton, and not a few hacks.—
Quarterly Review.
QUIIIIK LETTER DELIVERY.—The late
Duke of QUEENSBERRY undertook for a heavy bet to
convey a letter fifty miles within an hour. The letter was
enclosed in a cricket-ball, and thrown from one to the
other of twenty-four expert cricketers, and delivered
within the time.— Quarterly Review. _

A wag, in the night time, removed the sign-
board of a cutler, and placed it over a watch-house ; and
the passengers were equally diverted and surprised to
read over the bridewell,—" Blades put in here." The
same incorrigible rogue placed over a surgeon's door a
board inscribed, " Mangling done here."
COMMISSION OF LUNACY. Yesterday a
commission of Lunatico Inquirendo was executed at the
King's Arms Tavern, Kensington, before Messrs.
Philii-
more, C. K. Murray, and Whitmarsh, to try the sound-
ness of mind of Miss Emily Theodora Upjohn, now an
inmate in Mr. Finch's Asylum, Kensington.—Sir George
Tuthill, of Cavendish-square, first saw the supposed
lunatic on the 22d of April, when he visited her at Ken-
sington House Asylum, to investigate the state of her
mind. He found her labouring under a variety of delu•
sions ; she fancied she heard her mother's voice, she having
been dead several years, and that whilst she was residing
at Halifax she always heard the voices of persons who
concealed themselves, and she left the town in consequence
of this annoyance. Miss Charlotte Lush, one of the su-
perintendents of Kensington House, stated that Miss
Upjohn had been an inmate there during the last six years.
The Chief Commissioner (Mr. Phillimore) here requested
that the unhappy lady might be introduced to the Jury;
this was done accordingly, and the total aberration of
mind of the unfortunate lady was painfully apparent.--
After a short charge from the Chief Commissioner, the
Jury returned a verdict—That Miss Emily Theodora
Upjohn had been of unsound mind, and incapable of ma-
naging her affairs, since the 21st of July, 1832.
A MODEST PROPOSAL.—The late Earl of
Portsmouth told my uncle, Francis Toplady, as they
were walking in a park of his Lordship's, which com-
manded a view of the parish church, that he (the Earl)
had asked leave of the churchwardens to plaster and
whitewash the church all over, at his own expense ; to
which the answer he received was, " that they would
give his Lordship leave to repair and beautify the church,
upon condition of his presenting it with a new ring of
bells I".—Toplady's Posthumous Works, p. 196.

The Marquis of WESTMEATH said he hal looked to
the signatures of the petition presented by the Noble Lord
opposite (Stourton) for the abolition of tithes, which
pretended to be the petition of the Protestants of the
county of Westmeath, awl had found that it was not
signed by one Protestant.
Lord STOURTON said he could not doubt the accu-
racy of the Noble Marquis.
Lord CARBERY presented petitions agt'n,t tie
Irish Church Bill.

The Archbishop of CANTERBURY presented a peti-
tion against the the Irish Church Bill, from five Bishops,
22 Archdeacons, and 826 clergy of the Church of Ireland.
The petitioners expressed strongly their feelings with
respect to the Bill, as might be supposed.—(Hear.)
In justice to the petitioners, he must desire that the peti-
tion should be read at length, and he would take on him.
self to say that it was drawn up with great ability,
and that the sentiments it expressed were highly deserving
the consideration of the House, and he trusted they would
have their due weight in the discussion that was to
take place that night.
The petition was then read by the clerk, and states that
the petitioners •iewed with deep alarm the Bill
which had passed the House of Commons for an
alteration in the Church of Ireland, more par-
ticularly that part which contemplated the des-
truction of ten bishoprics, and deprecated the appropria-
tion of Church property to any but ecclesiastical purposes.
The petitioners also stated that the Bill was a breach of
the sth article of the Act of Union.

The Duke of NEWCASTLE pre,ented two petitions
from East Retford against the Irish Church Temporalities
Bill. The Noble Duke stated that he concurred entirely with
the prayer of the petition, thinking the Bill fraught with the
greatest mischiefs to the Established Church. The Noble
Duke, in conclusion, could not but regret that Ministers
bad thought fit to counsel his Majesty to violate his coro-
nation oath.—(Hear, hear.)

Earl GREY rose to order. The Noble Duke had made
a direct assertion that Ministers had counselled his Majesty
to violate his coronation oath.—(Hear.) He was willing
to admit that it was competent to the Noble Duke
to argue as much as he pleased as to the inconsistency
of the Bill with the obligations of that oath ; but
he must be allowed to state that it was not competent for
him to state distinctly in that House that Ministers had
advised his Majesty to violate the sacred obligation of an
oath.—( Hear.) He trusted, therefore, that the Noble Duke
would correct the expression he had used.—(Hear.) As
he had before observed, he was at liberty to argue as much
as he pleased on the inconsistency of the Bill with
the obligations of that oath, but he had no right to state
distinctly that Ministers had advised the violation of an
obligation so sacred.
The Duke of NEWCASTLE still thought that, in ad-
vising his Majesty to assent to the principle of this Bill,
the Ministers advised the Crown to that which would
tend to a violation of the coronation oath.—(Hear, bear.)
He feared that the fate of this Bill would be the same as
that of the Reform Bill, namely, that the intimidators
would overcome the intimidated.—(Hear, hear, hear.)
He earnestly deprecated the result of the Reform Bill
altering this Bill, for be was convinced that it should be
subversive of the established Church, and of all property.
He trusted their Lordships would, however, do their duty
to God and their country, and be governed by principle
not expediency. It was rumoured that, on a late occa-
sion, a letter was written from a certain high quarter
to the Reverend Bench opposite. He did not say that those
who bad advised the writing of that letter had done wrong
but he trusted the Reverend Bench would not forego the
discharge of their duty. If they did their duty without
turning to the right or to the left, without minding con-
sequences, they would not acquire the odium but the
gratitude of the country. Let them do their duty as
Christians and men.

The Bishop of LONDON said that he could not speak
for his brethren, but for himself he oed to say, that be was
obliged to the Noble Duke for his advice; but he trusted
that be Ivd a sufficient understanding of the great princi-
ples of this Bill to be able to guide him in his public
conduct without the Noble Duke's advice. He
was a little surprised at the language in which the Noble
Duke had conveyed his counsel, for he did not see how it
could be consistent with the duty of a prelate of the esta-
blished Church to gibe a vote on any subject, without
looking at the consequences.—(Hear, hear, hear.)
The Noble Earl had said it was not competent for any
Peer in that House to impute to his Majesty's Govern-
ment that they had advised his M jesty to break his
coronation oath. It was not for him (the Noble Dnke) to
argue at present whether his Majesty would violate his
coronation oath if he were to grant his Royal Assent to
the Bill now before their Lordships, but this he would
say, that the King could do no act without his ad-
visers,—his responsible advisers—( Hear, hear, hear)—
and that it was perfectly competent for any of
their Lordships to state their opinion upon the
advice given to his Majesty. If any of their Lord-
ships were of opin;on that the advice given to him w,ts
that he should break his oath, that Peer would be guilty,
if he did not charge the Ministry with so improper an Act.
Earl GREY said that he would not be driven by all
the sound and all the fury of the Noble Duke into any
premature discussion.—(Cheers.) When he called the
Noble Duke to order it was because he conceived that
the Noble Duke was guilty of a disrespect to the
usages of the House, in flatly charging the Government
with his Majesty to break his coronation oath.
Not doubt advisingdoubt
his Majesty acted under the advice of his
Councillors, and Government did not want the em-
phasis of the Noble Duke, to impress on them the due
sense of responsibility, which rested upon them in conse-
quence of the advice they gave. The advice they gave
was under the best discretion they could exercise. Un-
doubtedly any Peer was at liberty to argue that the provi-
sions of this Bill was inconsistent with the coronation oath.
he (Earl Grey) had met that argument before, and would
be prepared to meet it again; but it was a very different
thing to argue that, and to argue that his Majesty's
Government were guilty of deliberately advising
his Majesty to break his oath. The Noble Luke
had also complained that he bad recommend a Right Rev.