The Sun.
London, England, 1846-03-13 00:00:00

‘ari,l 62e. 68e.for malting. Northern rye is in better
P444'4Nls4ks have h,'en ;nude at 89c. a The stlp-
till,t3efZil are not heavy, and iiriees are rather better
,43i),,u60 bushels s:luthern at 64e. ; 2,000 do. do. 66e.;
(114`490.5 Jersey white and yellow at 68c. atts are
147 e. '3e' a 46e. for northern ; 2,500 bushels southern sold
P._

Ir,totisies---T‘
:Inotr, ue market is still very qul.et. No transactions
stek oave taken place ; what there has been done has
j'‘,e.si"-tenkf:l_ipmediate consumption. Beef still remains at
s 50, eK s quotation, say- fur mess, 8 dols. 25c. to
hlaillg prime, 5 dols. to 5 dol3. 25c. In pork, little or
11,1s.50eirgl , mess may be quoted at 12 dola. 25c. to
4,.Nghts.2,l?rune, 10 dols. to tU dols. 25c.
The albount offering to the different European ports
To L. •
!:tier::err)Pool-Cotton I-4d. to 5-16 d. • wool, Ad. • seeds,
ht barrel, 4s; tobeef (3041bs.),beef and pork,
• • flour, 2s. ; turpentine, 2s. 9d. to 35.; leather,
rikag heavy goods, per tor 255. to 275. 6d.; grain,
Tq.oei, Bd. • ' P "
11(Irra--.T
ti 3y „ -.Tobacco per hhd., 40s. to 41s. ; flour, per
Z per naval store;. 3s. 6d. to 45.; measurement
kvlo on, 303. to 403.; heavy goods, 405.; oil, 403. ;
111142:1; :seed s, per tierce, 10s. to 123. 6d. ; beef (304 lbs.
4e 011 England, 108 c. to 1081 c. .
NaLFFIELD, BAKEWELL,
AND
WEST MIDLAND RAILWAY.
Oci,d,,,Prom the Sheffield Independent.)
: a short time ago, to the agreement of betweenamal-
Zkl,ana this Company and the Manchester,
l;:t4ele oF,uldland, and we gave the substance of the
.4cater former Company, in which they accuse the
e Se f' Sheffield, and Midland of a gross breach of
Vs at;' as we have seen and heard, the statement yet
d, talswered. We now insert the petition of the
11‘,4s,th and West Midland Company, in which
ef,',lr enraplaint before Parliament, and pray that
`u e Manchester Sheffield, and Midland may be
rkl4ttilohr:.....that they inay'be heard before the Committee in
i
re,:air.rable the Commons of the United Kingdom of
Thy train and Ireland, in Parliament assembled.
reetern‘'le petition of the undersigned Provisional Di.
Itidl,s I the proposed Sheffield, Bakewell, and West
-nd Railway Company, and on behalf of such
i4ltjnfitirly,
;14iii,,-"That a Bill has been brought into your Ho-
tt!!,Sh,:',l'se, fur making a railway, to be called the Man-
Vlecc,'"eld, and Midland Junction Railway, which Bill
Npl,l A Bill for making a Railway from Sheffield to
%...to Le" and Bakewell, with a Branch in connexion there-
p " The Manchester, Sheffield, and Midland
cht ,anwa,
~,'llo43l',r,,Petrtioners humbly represent to your Honour-
cttsh,,,,r!lat the promoters of the said intended Man-
11:1kistie'ueld, and Midland Junction Railway Company,
ht,tihriO their petition to your Honourable House, for
tillleeL.Pg in the said Bill, and in bringing in such Bill,
ottal!'g to apply for the purposes of such Bill, certaiu
lieruk represented by the scrip of the said Corn-
kto is now issued and in the market, are acting con
Nit; ent, and to good faith with your petitioners,
the °nem are ready to verify.
sth ineasureproposed by your petitiOners' Company,
43 end s
eons whereof have been deposited in the
',‘Stkricectiof your Honourable House, and with the
47.; pursuant to the standing orders of your Ho-
\v`.'se), was and is a railway from Sheffield to
, 'rh branches respectively to Chesterfield and to
Vthe 'ne.lsure which is, in part„a competing line with
al aid proposed Manchester, Sheffield, and Midland
VuT way'
11 Nth Petitioners had made arrangements for the pro-
\lll4tnaee.neuessary capital for carrying into effect their
Rene-g AS a separate and independent project, and
h',lt Point of appropriating their shares for that pur-
Ito ef)te,,,rtain overtures for an arrangement between the
hl)t.e'r Ponies were received by your petitioners from
Esq., and others, as chairman and directors
J._ect.if the said proposed Manchester, Sheffield, and
,7ttert..., on Railway Company.
ctniti„, negotiations took place thereupon between
of direction of the two Companies, with a
o,44tehil_ arrangement, anal your petitioners were re-
4,,erumoters of the said proposed Manchester,.
Midland Junction Railway, not to appropriate
Litlad.r Mares, during the pendancy of such negotia-
QD",r Petitioners acce led to such request.
Zele,ijhe 7th day of November last, an agreement
Of ;;'' and signed between certain of the provisional
R4lael, TI on behalf of the said Manchester, Sheffield,
ightt 0 unction Railway Company, of the one part,
Ilia the provisional directors of and on behalf of the
the d' Bakewell, and West Midland Railway
Th Corn-
bqivotaer part, vihereby it was (among other things)
etee„U the said Companies:
Vhereie two Companies should be, and the same
tk,t Consolidated and united into one Company,
kkaaih l,'"'le of " The Sheffield and North Derbyshire
i
~%1„ at th
ere should be an united board of directors for
Th Med
at a Company
%`'dieleaPital should be raised sufficient to execute
kh,-I,E4o'mes of the two Companies, which was thereby
i 4, That ;1353 in 40,000'shares of 40/. each.
arh,,,ue above 40,000 shares, 25,000 shares should
Id 'v. and is,tfi,the then proprietors of the Manchester,
pleQland Junction Company ; 6,000 shares
the at the disposal of the then executive
"'M the uefaeld, Bakewell, and West Midland COM-
'.'4,4lQd. remainder should be disposed of as therein
titv
each Company should proceed separately to
notices, and make the county and parish
y-ofvplirahe plan of its own scheme as if to ground a sepa-
, Th ion to Parliament s
or
ineurr
tthe ,exPense both Companies then incurred,
the
,t eu, should be paid out of the consolidated
Then! ed Companies.
pe,,Te consolidated Board of Directors should pro-
'Ne,'Llrnent fur both projects in one Act, with such
rcia•er:l,l regard to those portions of the two schemes,
qriete`ra'',tnnion to both projects, viz., between Sheffield
\ as should be determined on in the manner
`t 't,
,k4iN the Sheffield, Bakewell, and West Midland
0. -Pang should not issue their allotment letters
t. Th
otiA at the'4lall4 present scrip of the Manchester, Sheffield,
!cia th Junction Company should be called in and re-
ittiq aje3 of 40/. each, under clause 4th of the agree-
Vleq arcs a new subscription deed should be prepared
the embrace the united schemes.
:Jte a.:;_onsolidation of the two Companies, by virtue of
atgla etir,etetnent, was announced by advertisement under
":,Der Ine chairmen of both Companies, in the public
atri Published in Sheffield, in the said month of
kst.