The Sun.
London, England, 1846-03-19 00:00:00

as the station was not in the parish of. Birmingham, but it was is
the borough of Birmingham, and the mistake was merely a substitu-
tion of the word parish f r borough.
The CHAIRMAN observed that this was not att Inaccuracy by which
any one could be misled.

any aqueduct,` archway, bridge, weir, canal, cut, dock,
ferry, harbour, navigation, pier, port, railway, reservoir,
tunnel, turnpike-road, and. water-work, and for all other
works and incloeures on tidal lands within the ordinary
spring tides,_ a general plan showing the situation
and approaches to the said aqueduct, archway,
harbour, &c. should be denoted upon a sheet or sheets
of tho. ordance survey, when published, or else upon
maps of an equivalent scale, and extending ten miles on
each side; together with enlarged plans and sections of
such parts of the works as are on the tidal lands within
the ordinary spring tides, on a scale of not less than
twenty feet to an inch, with the dimensions
figured thereon, shall, on or before the 30th day
of November, be deposited in the. Board of Admiralty;
and that the same resolution be made a standing order."
He was not .aware of anything further he had say, ex-
cept to express his opinion that this motion would be the
means of enabling the Admiralty to perform with
greater facility the important duties assigned to them,
and on those grounds he begged leave to move the reso-
lution in the words he had given.
Captain BERKELEY said he was very glad that the
Hon. Member had brought this subject before the
House, because he had a very strong case in point. He
would have. to call the attention of the House, on Mon-
day next,:to tae second reading of the Bill for building a
bridge over the river Dee, by the Great We stein Com-
pany. That Bill was thrown out last year, in con se- '
quence of the Admiralty refusing to permit any bridge
to be erected, as it would interfere with the naviga
tion. The Great Western Company now came forward
again to endeavour to obtain- a Bill to make a bridge
very little differing from the former one proposed ; and
they now put the House to the expense and trouble of a
Committee, although they were aware that their project
had been formerly rejected. He should certainly object
to the second reading of the Bill on Monday next, as it
would put the parties to an enormous and unnecessary
expense.
Lord R. GROSVENOR, after a few observations that
did not reach the gallery, said that in consequeece of
four railways being proposed which would cross the river
Dee, the Town Council, who are the conservators of the
river, had been put to great expense and anxiety.
They were not aware to which railway the Admiralty
would object ; and until they knew what course the
Admiralty would pursue on the subject, they could not
tell how to act. The evidence taken before the Tidal
Commissioners, in the course of August last, gave
the inhabitants -of Chester reason to believe that
the Admiralty would not consent to the slightest inter•
ference with the navigation of that river. Since that
time it had been decided by an engineer being sent
down to examine and report on the nature of the bridges
by which these railways proposed to cross the river, and,
the queition he had to ask of the Right Hon. Baronet,
and one which he wished be would answer was, whether
the Admiralty, as guardians of the river, would permit
any interference whatever with the navigation of the
river ?
Mr. ORMSBY GORE said, that in corroboration of
the statement just made, he begged to say that the Dee
Commissioners had been about to deepen the river and
improve its navigation; but that project was put a stop
to by the speculators of these railways. He sincerely
hoped that what had been brought forward by the Hon.
Member for Montrose would. have the effect of stopping
this evil.
Sir GEORGE COCKBURN said he was very glad
this motion had been- made, as it would relieve the
Admiralty from a great deal of trouble, and they would
know what course they had to pursue with regard to this
project.
After a few words from Admiral DUNDAS, and Sir G.
COCKBURN,
Mr. JERVIS said it would give great satisfaction to
his constituents to find that the Admiralty were deter-
mined to keep
-up the navigation of the river.
Captain PECHELL hoped the motion would have the
effect of drawing the attention of the Admiralty to the
construction of bridges across rivers, and he was sure
they would be actuated by the strictest impartiality.
The motion was then agreed to.
Mr. HUME then moved that the resolution be a
standing order of the House.—Agreed to.
Mr. HUME also moved that the promoters of Bills
introduced this session be required to deposit plans
with the Admiralty, as provided in the resolution just
agreed to.
Sir R. INGLIS took that opportunity of expressing a
hope that a clause would be introduced into the standing
orders, providing that when the 30th of November fell
on a Sunday the deposit of plans should be made on the
Monday fielowing.
Sir G. CLERK said that a wrong construction had
been put upon. the standing orders by the officers of the
Board of Trade. It was clear that no deposit should be
made on a Sunday. The standing order with respect to
the deposit of plans was the same in effect as that relat-
ing to the service of notices.
METROPOLITAN RAILWAYS STATION.
Mr. PATTEN, in rising tai move for the appointment
of a Commission to investigate and report on the
various railway projects, the termini of which were
proposed, to be in the metropolis, said he held in his
hand a map eoi the metropolis, which showed the
various stations proposed to be established in
the capital ; and he thought be could not do better
Veen call the attention of the House to it. It had been
estimated that the ground required for them would be
CORN-LAWS. 200 acres, which could only be had by knocking away
The Duke of RICHMOND presented three peeitions, nine or ten thousand houets at a large expense. It was
from certain landed proprietors of the county of Devon, proposed that one station should be established in Parlia-
against the present measure. The same Noble Duke meat-street, another on Cornhill, two in Holborn,
presented a numerously-signed petition from the yoemen and others in various parts of the metropolis.
of Norfolk, who complained that in . the event of the Under these circumstances, the Committee of Selection
present measure of the Government passing they had thought it better that the matter should be referred
would be subjected to great injustice by the to a practical body who resided on the spot and under-
operation of the present Act of commutation stood the question, rather than refer it to a Corn-
of tithes, which fixed the sum of money mittee of Honoureasie Members, who were se-
ta be paid for tithes upon the septennial lected from distant parts of the country, and who were
'ir conclusions from such vircl voce average of the price of corn, and the Government pr.,- to arrive at tha
Fre'et be. brought before them. He begged,
evi-
posed that at the end of three sears all protection to the dente as mi
landed interest should cease. They therefore . preqed therefore, 'to move an address to her Majesty, for the ap-
that, in the event of the present measure becoming law, pointmeent of a Commission, to investigate and report
their Lordships would introduce an Act to authorise the upon, the various railway projects of which the termini
taking of the average price of corn either yearly or half are proposed to be established within or in the immedi-
yearly, instead of septennially, as required by the present ate vicieSty of the metropolis. law. The petition was numerously and respectably signed; Sir R. PEEL—I have no doubt that the Hon. Gen-
and if he might prophesy, he would say that if the un• tlerean has very good reasons for the course that he
fortunate measure of Government should receive the has attempted to pursue, but I feel that there is somr -
sanction of their Lordships' House, many thousands of thing due to the country, as well as to the several
petitioners would hold the same arguments ; and lee 'companies whose interests he is anxious to advocate. I
(the Duke of Richmond), for one, did not see how te.e do not desire to state these reasons at the present mo-
arguments could be got rid of.:
ment, because there is a necessity for considering this
LONDON AND YORK RAILWAY - The Marquis of CLANRICARDE pre subject in the whole of its bearings. What the reasons are
~fir Lordship's
anted two for such a course it is not for me at present to state, nor
petitions, to which he begged to call t 1
no Committeeof to say whether such a commission should be appointed
attention, one was for the revival of .1
or not. At the present juncture I have only to assert
. pointment of C m
last year, and the second for the are
that the interests which he is desirous of furthering have
.ay, or rather.. into the baps
received the best consideration of the Ministry. Per-
mittee to inquire into the val,idity of the su
new subscription -
tion deaa of the comps-
e haps I am not stating the precise position of the ques-
admisty of the
tiou ; but my impression is, that the whole of the rea-
The •
petitioners raised were urel contract.
y sons ought to have been embodied in the report of
P'..,ints of laws and he thought that ptheir the Committee, for then there would have been sufficient
. points which the.
matter argued. It appeared that a great number of
Lordships stould appoint a Committee to hear the grounds for the consideration of the House. At the present
moment we have no statement on which we can rely,
names who had signed the old subscription list had not
subscribed the new, and he doubted much whether they and taking this objection, and believing that more suffi-
could be legally released from their engagement under dent reasons might have been afforded to the House,
that deed; Another point also was as to parties cleanin g I feel-bound to say that the debate could not well be
taken to-day, even according to the statement of the
to comae before Parliament as the proprietors .of ihe
deposits paid by otber parties. Now, it was aHon. Member.' I- - shall therefore move, Sir, that
question Hon.
debate be adjourned mini Monday,
whether any such transfer could be legal or re- Ministry
will be in possession of the information which
ceivecl: by. their Lordships' House,. inasmuch as it when the
is necessary to enable them to judge of which will be
would be an evasion of the Stamp Act. Theie were the best places as stations for railways in the metropolis.
points which ought to be seen into, and therefore he On the question being again put,
gave notice that to-morrow he would move for a Com- Mr.- FOX .MAULE said that whatever the stations
mittee of Pin House upon the subject. The- petitioners, might be, and that whatever the reasons of Govern-
he dent state, were James Tyler and George Payne. '
ment might be for the Government delaying their de-
Lead
,BEAUMONT said that they had not nothing cision, there ,was not the slightest doubt but that
to do with the subscription-list of last year. There the public were terieieusly in need of the stations to
could be transfer from a deed not in existence. - which the lion. Member had referred, and he only re-
Lord CLANRICARDE thought that the present gretted that the statement which had been submitted to
London and York 'projectors had in that case no right t the House did not comprehend a definition of their precise
come in under the old subscription contract; and the o orders. lie agreed that a Committee of this House could
re-
fore no right to claim- the advanced, stage they were at not answek the whole requirements of the case, and he
present in.
thought that the accommodation that was required
Lord BEAUMONT—The parties were now a veryought to be rfd d subject, perhaps, to the confirma-
pole,
different position. - .
ton of the city authorities. There was no question but
The Earl of S.HAFTESBURY did not think such '
. that this was a matter which nearly concerned the
condition could be complied with, - - people ; but he believed that the time was come for the
Earl GREY considered that it was coite necessary settlement of the business.
that they should have a new deed. '-' Sir G. GREY thought that the great objection to the
Lord MONTEAGLE said that the present deed might appointment of this Commission was the prevailing
be considered a substitution for the old deed. Last year opinion that it would interfere with the operations a
an objection had been taken to the contract deed, an the Board of Trade.
a Committee was appointed to inquire into the subject Mr. WILSON PATTEN said his sole object in
the report of which had not been received '
. prior to the
making the motion for the appointment of the Com-
dissolution of Parliament. mnaittee was to obtain the fullest information on the
(LEFT SPZAKINCI.) . ,
subject. -
....

form system in the management of railways, and
of securing the fulfilment of the provisions given
by the -Ad of ParHan:fent under which tho com-
panies have obtained their powers; and by which greater
accommodation and safety may be secured to the public.
Secondly, to take into consideration the best means of
avoiding extravagant expense for obtaining Acts of Par-
liament by ' bona fide concerns, and of preventing
the formation of schemes got up for the purposes of spe-
%illation. Thirdly, to consider what legislative measures
can be framed for the protection of individuals from the
injuries they may sustain by the laying down of lines
through their property, without the ruinous expense of
opposing them in Parliament. He knew cases where
individuals had been so interfered with by railways, and
their solicitors and agents had told them it would be
better for them to submit to the injury than to go to the
expense of obtaining redress in Parliament.
Lord BROUGHAM said, that in the case of a Com
mittee formed to inquire into the operation of the Irish
poor-law, circumstances have occurred to which he felt
it necessary to call the attention of the House. The
Committee was obstructed in its proceedings by a wit-
ness refusing to produce papers and answer ques-
tions, being forbidden by the order of the
Poor-law Commissioners to disclose to the Com-
mittee the contents of certain documents. It
is so monstrous a thing, that he could hardly
have believed it, had he not seen Mr. Unison, the Poor-
law Commissioner, also the letter in which he asks per
mission of the. Poor-law Commissioners to produce to
the Committee the correspondence. Mr. Gulson told
him that he could not give the answer to the letter, but
he assured him that the answer expressly forbid him
to produce the papers.
' Lord CLAN CARTY said the witness certainly did
object to produce the papers before the Committee, and
he thought it a. fit subject for inquiry, and it had
been his intention to bring the circumstances under
the notice of the House. Had he not been anticipated
by his friend Lord Brougham. Mr. Gulson bad refused
to produce the papers, but had now now obta,ined per-
mission of the Poor-law. Commissioners ; but he objected
that the House should be dcpenent.on the permission
of • any public body for the papers necessary to
carry out the inquiries. Ho had thought that the
Committee ought to have noticed the circumstance by
some-special report in their general report, as he looked
with great jealousy in the manner in which the Poor-law
Commissioners. had interfered, as there was an Act of
Parliament which laid dowu the manner in which the
duties should be discharged.
Lord BROUGHAM said though the papers were pro-
duced to-morrow an offence against their privilege had
been committed, as those who had refused to produce
them had prevented their inquiry from going on to-day.•
The Poor-law Commissioners should be told that it was
at their peril that •they,refused to produce these papers.
They had no right to refuse to produce them. Mr.
Gulston- said he had not their permission to do
so ; but they had no permission to withhold them.
If the Committee required these documents, they might
report to the House, and obtain an order for their pro-
duction. He was anxious to keep their privileges in as
small a compass as possible, compatible with the proper
carrying on of the business entrusted to them, and he
would not consent to forego any privilege of an inquisi-
torial character which was necessary.
The Earl ST. GERMANS inquired if the papers re-
ferred to were " private and confidential ?"
The Earl of CLANCARTY said they were, but that
nevertheless they contained the instructions of the Poor-
law Commissioners to Mr. Gulston.
Lord MONTEAGLE also considered that no public
body had any right to refuse the production of papers
required by Parliament. The House was not only left
without information, but by having only a portion of
the information they required, was in a woree position
than if they had none at all. vsrsif •
Lord CLARE said he was a member of the Committee,
that Mr. Gulston stated that he was forbidden to pro-
duce the papers by the Poor-law Commissioners.
Lord CAMPBELL said be apprehended there must
be some mistake in this matter, as Mr. Gulston would
not have been so so ridiculously absurd as to have re-
fused those papers.—(Hear, hear.) The Commissioners
were bound to produce all papers that were necessary
to facilitate this inquiry ; and it was for the committee
to decide what papers were and were not necessary, and
not for the commissioners. This was the most important
public inquiry that had been instituted for some time,
and therefore every facility should be afforded it.
Lord BROUGHAM said that Mr. Gulston wrote a
letter to the Poor-law Commissioners to know whether,
if he should be called upon to produce certain papers, he
should do so ; and the answer was, that the paperi were
private and confidential, and should not be produced.
He would not have said so much upon this case
but that he was already cognizant of a defi-
ciency of judgment by those Commissioners in refe-
rence to Mr. Parker's case. He had defended
the Poor-law Commi.sionera when they deserved de-
fence ; and, therefore, he now warned them to attend
more to the letter and the will of Parliament, and to do
their duty without fear of the newspapers.—(Hear,
hear.) That was the charge he made against them, for
they had avowed their fear of the press.—(Hear, hear.)
The Earl of CLANCARTY presented a petition from
the medical practitioners of the county of Clare praying
for the repeal of the present law affecting their pro-
fession.

fir. Cearna then called the clerk of the peace. for Worcester to
prove a discrepancy between the plans and sections, and said-that, as
the discrepancy did not appear except on. the sealed plans, he must
request the Committee to order the witness to open the sealed plans;
• The Committee gave the order required.
Mr. BuiuM inqnired whether these plane had ever been opened
before ° •

The Clerk of the Peace.replied thatthey-had not, and proeeeded to
open the " virgin documents" for the inspection of the Committee.
The plans having been opened, the alleged diserepaucy was
" non est inventus."
Mr. Rutin observed, that- his friend had found a' " mare's nest,"
and recommended that the plans should be sealed up again.
The next allegation fell to the ground.
The next petition taken alleged that there was no contineus plan
of the railway deposited with the clerks of the peace.. This
allegation was founded upon the fact that certain property was
omitted in the plan, and a reference was made to an additional and
enlarged plan. This point had previously been argued at great length
upon previous petitions.
A witness was called to prove the omission of certain property
from the plans.
Mr. BURKS observed that he thought his friend had no right, upon
an allegation that there was no continuous plan, to go into a ques-
tion as to the correctness of any particular part of the plan.
A discussion here ensued, which ended in the point being reserved.
It was next alleged that the mileage was not marked from the
station of the Grand Junction Railway where the line was said to
begin, lut from the station at Charles-street, Birmingham.
This allegation was admitted by Mr. Burke.
The next allegation, which also had reference to the point as to
the additional plans, was withdrawn.

. -
It was next alleged that the datum line was not the same through-
out, the distance between the datum line and the line of falls being
four feet greater at the beginning of one sheet than at the end of the
sheet preceding.
_ _

Mr. Burke admitted the discrepancy, but submitted that the alle-
gation was not proved, as the datum line was in fact the same.
The Committee determined to report that the standing orders were
not complied with, Mastnuch as the distance between the datum line
and the line of rails was incorrectly marked. They considered that
the datum line was the same throughout, and that the error was in
the making of the gradient.
The next allegation had reference to an inaccuracy in the datum
line, which in one of the plans was not straight. It was represented
on the other side that the crookedness of the line was owing to the
shrinking of the transfer paper used in engraving the plans, and that
the distance between the rails and the datum line was correct. •
The Committee itavMg heard evidence on both sides, decided that
the allegation was not proved.
Upon the allegation that a carriage-mail, passing throngh.the field;
Marked No. 27, on'the plans, was not marked, the Committee de.
tided that the standing orders were not complied with.
The Committee were discussing a question as to whether a certain
road was a public carriage way or not, When Mr. Speaker was an-
nounced at prayers, and the Chairman having re-sealed the plans
which had been opened far the purpose of exhibiting Mr.'Carter't
" mare's nest," as Mr. Burke had termed it,
The Committee adjourned till to-morrow.

STANDING ORDERS' COMMITTEES.
HOUSE OF LORDS.
(Continued from our Afternoon Edition.)
DONCASTER, WAKEFIELD, AND LEEDS RAILWAY.
Tills was the next case which occupied the attention of the Com-
mittee, who, after an extremely lengthened investigation, decided that
the Company had complied with the standing orders.
HUNTINGDON- AND WISBEACH RAILWAY.
After hearing the usual evidence, the Committee decided that the
Company had not complied with the standing orders.
LYNN AND ELY (EXTENSION TO MARCH.)
Tn this case the. committee decided that the -Company had
complied with the standing orders.
ELY AND HUNTINGDON -RAILWAY (BEDFORD • EKTEN.
SION).
The Committee declared that the Company had complied with the
standing, orders in this case.
LYNN AND ELY EXTENSION TO SPALDING.
A like decision was also given in this case.
The Committee adjourned at five o'clock.

IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT.

(THIS DAY.)

HOUSE OF LORDS.
The Earl of SHAFTESBURY took his seat on the Wool-
sack at Five o'clock.
THE MIDLAND GREAT WESTERN RAILWAY.
Lord BROUGHAM presented a petition from a
landed proprietor in Galway against the Midland Great
Western Railway. He moved that the petition be re-
ferred to the Committee on the Bill.

IRISH GREAT WESTERN.
The NOBLE ANDILEA;INED LORD also presented a pets
tion from the undertakers of the Grand Canal, Ireland,
praying that thej might be heard by counsel against
the Great WeVitra ; and a petition from Thomas Berry,
a proprietor In the same Company.
CHARITABLE TRUSTS BILL.
Lord DAORE presented a petition against this Bill.
DIRECT PORTSMOUTH AND EPSOM, AND

DORKING RAILWAYS.
Lord CAMPBELL said he had two petitions to pre-
sent, in which he took a lively interest, against these
railways, from a lady of the highest respectability—the
widow of the late Under-Secretary for Ireland, Mr.
Drummond. She stated that she was now the
proprietrix of a beautiful estate, near Ledwell (as
we understood), iu the county of Surrey, which was
formerly the property o: Mr. Richmond Sharp—(Hear,
hear, from Lord Brougham)—who he believed was well
known to his Hon. and Learned Friend. This estate
commanded the most beautiful prospect in the world.
Now, he was of opinion that her rights were by no
means respected, because she was a*widow, as the Direct
Portsmouth and Epsom and Dorking Railways were
projected to run through the very heart of her estate,
which in that part was laid out in most
beautiful plantations, upon an elevation of fifteen feet.
This he conceived to be a very great hardship, and he
trusted that such spoliation would not be permitted. It
was a mere mockery to speak of compensation in
such a case as this. If the late Mr. Drummond
were alive no such aggression would be attempted, and
therefore he (Lord Campbell) hoped that whatever
Committee should have charge of the Bill they would
take care of the rights of the petitioner.
LA WS OF MORTMAIN.
Lord BEAUMONT begged to correct a mistake that
had been made in the public prints, in reference to a
petition he presented to this House a few nights
ago. That petition was from several extensive
landed proprietors in the counties of Durham and
Northumberland, praying that the powers of
the Roman Catholic bishops, as defined in the Mort-
main Act, might he restricted. But the newspapers
had made it appear that the petition was from
the inhabitants of the city of Durham, and the
consequence was, that a meeting was held in that town
for the purpose of ascertaining who the parties were
who had signed the petition. He, therefore, hoped that
this explanation would go forth, in order to remedy the
error.

DISTURBANCES IN IRELAND.
The Marquis of LONDONDERRY begged to call
the attention of the House to a matter of some import-
ance, with a view to ascertain whether the Government
had any knowledge of it. As there was now before this
House a Bill affecting Ireland, he did think it would be
desirable to clear the matter up. It alluded to the pre-
sent state of Roscommon, and contained statements
which could scarcely be believed. The Noble Marquis
then read astatement from adocument he held in his hand,
from which it appeared that the system of eviction of
tenantry was sadly on the increase in Ireland. It Ives
stated in a journal published in Roscommon a few days
ago—although he did not believe the truth of the whole
of that statement—that a certain lady had dispossessed
no less than four hundred tenants a few weeks ago
and who were consequently plunged into 'she
greatest distress, without the slightest me co, of
shelter. That lady and her Lusband had, on the
authority of the same journal, dispossessed upwards
of 2,000 human beings within the last two years. sow,
although he (the Marquis of Londonderry) could not for
a moment believe that f;tie statements were, on the
whole, correct, althotr" they were printed in very
large letters, yet he d'Adthink that if the Government
had any power of Fr:eventing those most cruel evictions
Public ought to do, something in this particular case.'
not ce, in. his opinion, ought to be taken of this'
matter. Every one must feel that no country could be
properly carried on when such cruelties. were -per=
mitted. lie -therefore wished to know whether the
Government had made any inquiry into the circum-
stances, and, if they had, whether they had. any objec-
tion to lay the information before their Lordships.
Earl ST. GERMANS said that the Noble M.ar-
quis had been kind enough to give him notice, that
morning of his intention to put that question. In re-
ply, he (the Earl of St, Germans) had to say that the
Government had ree.eived no information whatever
of the circurestancea ; indeed, it would be very difiiclut
to obtain any in4:ormation, inasmuch as there were no
names given. It appeared to him, howevermuch they may
deplore this extraordinary exercise of power it was im-
possible for the Government to prevent it. But at the
same time if they should obtain any information, he on
the part of the Government, would be most happy to fur-
nish it.
Ear's CLANRICARDE said that the caseappeared so
koreible, that he thought it deserving of notice. It was
quite possible to arrive at the particulars of the case,
if the names of the parties could be obtained, because,
if any parties bad been ejected, there must' have been
some previous process at the Court of Quarter Sessions,
or the Baronial Courts in which case there would be a
record, and after the particulars were obtained he should
be most happy to move that a CemrAittee of that House
be appointed to take into consideration the amendment
of the present law of landlord and tenant.—(Hear.)
The Marquis of LONDONDERRY said that he had
not the experience or abilility of the Noble Lord who
had just spoken, and nrdt being connected with the
south of Ireland, he did not prosecute his inquiries into
the matter. lie thol.lght that in stating the case to the
House, and in calling the attention of the Government
to the sulaje-ct,. they would make necessary, inquiries, and
report to the Rouse what measures they would adopt to
put
a rtop in the time coming to similar proceedings.
tab4e. d CLANRICARDE said that he might be mis-
en in mentionin that information might be had from
*ce;aeiv3e3darfrOnnaialtCheauLtesg--.-criffe,artoadiincley information might be re.
The Earl ST. GERMANS 'said that the Government
did not desire to conceal yof the facts. All he had
said was that it was not inanthet power of Government, if
The Marquis of WESTM;WiI
these proceedings were legal,
salloble Marquis who had brought forward t stame were in
aware that they the habit of reading the Irish did sto th.
ipdto ttato CITCUM"
emy
the
he would be newspapers,
e
themselves to the truth.—(Laughter.)no t alway -confine
Lord STOURTON postponed the motion for certain
returns of which he had given notice, in order not to in-
terfere with the very important question on Ireland,
which came on on Monday firs`.
MINISTERS' MONEY.
Lord CAMPBELL presented a petition from the
magistrates and town council of Cork, praying for the
.abolition of Ministers' money.
CHARITABLE
NOBLEL
ORD also T
presented
R S TaS .
petition from
certain bookbinders against the Charitable Trusts Bill.
MIDLAND GREAT WESTERN RAILWAY.
Lord BROUGHAM presented a petition from the
guardians of Lord Forbes -(as we thought) and the
Viscountess torbes, against the above railway, which
threatened to destroy the property of Castle Forbes.
ALTERATIONS IN THE RAILWAY SYSTEM.
Lord KINNAIRD said that he would propose on
Thursday next, that a Committee be appointed to take
ate aoustticratiou the beet weans of Otrocluoing one auks

gir R. H. INGLIS called the attention of the Chair-
man of the Committee (Mr. Greene) of her Majesty's
Government to a . point in connexion with the matter
under discussion. So fir as he understood the subject
of a central station for the metropolis, there were two or
three schemes not abandoned that terminated in
the city, but did not extend to the river. It struck
him that as the river was the greatest highway in the
world, that half the benefit of any terminus would be
lost unless the railway station came close to the river
side. He was aware of one plan that proposed to have a
station opposite Hungerford Bridg e. Now what he wished
to call the attention of the House and the promoters of
this scheme to, was. whether it was not possible,
without great engineering difficulties, to carry the
plan further up the bank of the river, so as to give more
general accommodation.
Mr. LABOUC.EIERE considered that the Govern-
ment should have attended to this matter before now.
They ought to have laid their plans if they had any at
the commencement of the session. This would have
been the proper course, and avoided much difficulty.
Whatever delay took place would only cause specula-
tors in land to raise prices, so that the promoters of
railway companies would be placed under great disadvan-
tages. He was, however, not surprised at the Government
not taking the matter up with so much avidity as he should
liked them to have done after what had befallen the
reports of the Boara of Trade last year. Whatever
might be the difficulty of the case, he hoped the ques-
tion would be taken up at the earliest possible period,
and some arrangement come to. He hoped the Govern-
ment bad given it their serious consideration, and that
they were prepared now with some plan. His
mind was entirely made up on the question and he
considered that it would be much better investigated by
a commission than it would be by a Select Com - mitten of the House. He thought, however, that the at-
tention of the Government ought to lhavo been called to
it earlier in the session, for if that had been
done a great deal of time would have been saved,
and other advantages would have been gained, which,
in all probability, could not now be mado availabla
Sir R. PEEL said that his mind was also made up on
the subject. Her Majesty's Government have had it
under attentive consideration only during the last f. w
days. As nu reasons hdAt been given in the rul,. L fol
the recommendation it conveyed, he considered that it
woald be rather a dangerous precedent to establish to
MILLI'S%) is it a ova wig futtlar eau is

HOUSE OF COMMONS,
The SPgmtEn took the Chair at'Four o'clock.
SECOND READING.
The following Bill was read a second time, and or-
dered to be printed, viz.—London, Salisbury, and Yeovil
Junction Railway (Basingstoke to Yeovil)..
Lord EBRINGTO.N moved that the Plymouth Great
Western Docks Bill, which stood on the paper for to-
day, be read a second time on this,day fortnight, as the
Company had some arrangements to make which were
not yet completed.
DELAYS AT THE BOARD OF TRADE.
Mr. GREENE said he- was extremely happy to see
his Right Hon. Friend the Vice-President of the Board of
Trade (Sir G. Clerk) in his place, because he wished to
call his attention to the great delay which took place,
not only at the Board of Trade, but in all the other de-
partments of the Government, in inserting clauses which
came within their province in the Railway Bills now
before Parliament. Tbus considerable unnecessary ex-
pense was entailed on the promoters of these Bills, and
much valuable time wasted.—(Hear.)
Sir GEORGE CLERK said there Was no want of
diligence in inserting the clauses referred to, and that it
was perfectly impossible to proceed faster with the great
number of Bills, in which clauses had to be inserted,
unless the public interests were neglected. Ater the complaint of his Hon. Friend, he should take cafre that
no delay took place except such as was necessary.
The subject then dropped.
OXFORD AND CAMBRIDGE RAILWAY.
Mr. DUNCOMBE presented a petition in favour
of this Bill.
LONDON AND OXFORD RAILWAY.
Captain OSBORNE presented a petition in favour
of the abovenatned Bill.
Mr. ESTCOURT
so movedfar
aths artegarthdes sttha:dcinhgichoersterr
CHICHESTER AND BOGNOR RAILWAY.
110 be suspended,
and Bognor Railway Bill, and that the Bill be read a
second time. He moved that the standing order be
suspended principally on the ground of the great saving
of money to tbe parties concerned.
The motion was then agreed to. The Bill was read a
second time and ordered to be committed.
RAILWAYS.—ADMIRALTY PLANS.
Mr. HUME then moved, "that in case of Bills for
Amain, mailltaiaing, varying, Wending, or enlarging

THE. SUN, LONDON, THURSDAY EVENING MARCH 19) 1846.

MERIT IN THE ARMY.
Captafin LAYARD wished to ask the Right Hon.
Seeretar:7 at War, if it was intend that meritorious sol-
diers, and officers' servants, slaJuld have extended to
them the. be-nefits of the new warrant ?
Mr. SWNEY HERBERT was understood to say that
h 3 wt a twit at present prepared to make the alterations.

COMMONS' SUMMARY.
• The SPEAKER took the Chair at four o'clock.
Several :Railway Bills were read a second time, and ordered
to ha committed.
Mr. GEZENE, in moving the recommital of a Bill, took
occasion to complain of the great delay that took place in a
public offir,e, in sending in their clauses to Bills, whereby
great expense and inconvenience was occasioned.
Sir GEORAGE CLERK believed that such delay did not take
place in the office of the Board of Trade, and would take
care that, in future, the occurrence complained of should be
avoided it t all the Government offices.
The Chichester and-Bognor Railway Bill was read a second
time, and ordered to be committed, on the motion of Mr-
ESTCOURT, who moved the suspension of the standing
order 110 ror that purpose.
Mr. Wu. SON PATTEN called the attention of the House to
the sixth i-eport of the Rail Ways Classification Committee,
and move 'ltn rddresti to her Majesty for•the appointment of a
Committee to investigate and report- upon the -variOns
way proje'ts of which the termini are proposed to be esta-
blished wii-thin, or in the immediate vicinity of the metropolis.
Sir R. P. EEL doubted, the propriety of the House adopting
the motion upon a mere verbal statoment. He should pro-
pose the debate be adjourned to Monday, when he would
state the caursc her Majesty's Government would propose to
be taken.
Mr. F. MAPLE hoped the Government would follow the
course prat ,osed by the Committee, and address her Majesty
to appoint a Royal Commission.
After sot ne observations from Sir G. GREY, It. INGLIS,
and Mr. LABOUCIIERE, ,
Sir R. P;Egi. said that notice should be given to-morrow of
the motioa intended to be made by the Government on the.
subject on ..Monday. ,
After a ~short discussion, the debate was adjourned till
Monday.
Lord En RLNGTOIi gave notice of his intention on Tuesday
next to ma ve for papers relative to the letting out paupers to
hire in the Honiton Union. -
Mr. P. 8 CROPE gave notice of his intention on Tuesday to
move for it-ave to bring in a Bill for the better protection of
life and woperty in Ireland by more effectually pro-
viding for the improvement of the condition of the poor
of that country.

Mr. llflAciuKNolg gave notice of his intention to move, on
Tuesday n ext, for kayo to bring in a Bill to prever.t inter-
ments in Is :rge towns, _

Sir G. G.tuilr wished to know whether it was the intention
of the Admiralty to inatitute any inquiry into the loss of the
Great Liverpool ?

Mr. Consir thought it would be an objectionable precedent
to institute any such inquiry, especially after the directors of
tit...e Company had instituted an inquiry upon the subject.
~ms--. p. N. STEWART, as chairman ;of the Committee, said
that ev..'rY care bad been taken to prevent accidents, and
that this .I,,:fut the first serious one that had occurred in the
Company
with the Compel.:
v had been appointed to inquire into the
subject. ,s
SL,rvice, Three nautical gentlemen connected
Mr. SIDNICY HERIA.Irr'
in answer to a question from Cap-
tain LAYARD, stated the,`' he was not prepared, without fur-
ther inquiry, to Make any . alterations in the circular which
fficers servants, and other de-
bad been iavued, by which
serving and meritorious soldier.' were not allowed to benefit
to the full extent of the new warr...nt,* ,
Biil Was agreed to,
The report on the Fever Orelans ti
with certain amondments, the bill w.. 13 ordered to be en-
grossed, an 4 read a third time this day.
(utrr strrato.) ,

Ho thought, sherefore, the best course would be tot NEW ORDERS IN C
leave the matter at rest for the present, and he would _
announce what course the Government- intended to
pursue with reference to it on Monday next;
After a few words from .Mr. W. PATTEN, which
were inaudible, . . . •
Mr. HUME said, that before the question was brought
to a close, he wished. to say a few ;verde-relative to the
observations made by the Right Honourable Gentleman
which seemed to reflect on the Board of Trade: He paid
considerable attention to the•proceedings of that .Board,
and he did not think that they. were deserving of any cen-
sure for the manner in which they had discharged their
duties. He had, in consequence of the discussins on its
proceedings which had taken. place•in that House, made
the most careful inquiries, into its manegement,
and he had every reason to believe that the Noble
Lord at the bead- of, that Board (with whom
he had never spoken more than five minutes in his life),
and Mr. Porter, with the other gentlemen of whom it
was composed, had discharged .their duties in the most
indefatigable and independent manner. He did consid, r
that these reflections cast upon public men were very
discouraging to them in the performance of their duty.
Mr. LABOUCHERE begged that -he might not be
inisunderstOcid, for he by no means meant to cast the
slightest personal reflection upon any of. the members
composing that board, but be did assert what be had.
many -times, previously. said, that it was not con-
stituted in such a manner as to . carry the weight .with
the House which it ought. He_ would again disclaim
any intention of casting a reflection upon any member of
the board.
Sir G. CLERK,saidthat he-must bear witness to the
indefatigable zeal and fidelity 'of the Right Honourable
Gentlemen who were Members . of- 'that board.
The GOvernment could not have interfered after
the jealousy WhiCh had been -expressed by
the House against- .any inteference upon their part.
The debate was then adjourned till, Monday next.
NIGHTLY ASYLUMS..
. Mr. HUME presented a petition, signed by 1;000 of
the rate-payers of Chelsea, against the establishment of
nightly asyltims for the, poor. , . •
Lord EBRINGTON gave notice that he would, on
Tuesday next, move for papers relative to the Honiton
Union, where-the pauper labourers. were sent to labour
in the fields.
Mr. P. SCROPE gave.notice that he would, on Tues-
day next, Move for the introduction df a Bill which
would give better relief to the qoor eareland.
Sir G. GREY wished to ask the Right Hon. the
Secretary to the Admiralty, whether there had been any
inquiry as to the loss a the Liverpool steam-ship ?
He wished to know if there ought not to be an inquiry
similar to that of a court martial, which was generally
instituted when any of her Majesty's vessels were lost?
Mr. CORRY said the Admiralty had no right to
make' such an investigation as -that which • had been
suggested. Their duty was simply confined to
the receipt and delivery of tbe mails, and to
see that the terms of • the contract were faithfully
adhered to. In this case, the. whole of the responsibility
rested with the officers of the C6inpany, 'and the Admi-
ralty, although they had been applied to by the Company
to do so, had considered that it would be an ob-
jectionable , prececent to appoint a naval. officer
to act in a court of inquiry upon the aets of any officer
not in the 'service of the country. The directors of
the steam-packet company had, howsver, insti-
tuted an inquiry, . and they had requested that
he Admiralty agent, who was on board the vessel
at the time of her loss should- be present at that inquiry,
and the admiralty agent had been requested to attend
accordingly. -
Mr. P. M. STEUART, as Chairman of the Penin-
sular and Oriental Steam Packet Company, wished
to make a few observations. -.He was glad that this
subject • had been brought before the House. The
Company were most anxious that every inquiry should
be made into every act of theirs. The Comdauy
never allowed any act of negligence, or any mis
conduct, in any of their servants to go without the
strictest investigation. .The consequence of this -was
that after carrying thousands of persons thousands of
miles, this was the first serious accident that had occurred
in the company's service. Many months ago when
certain carelessness .gas' observed, the 'necessary
attendant of a-long course of uninterrupted success they
dictated a letter to be addressed_ to all their officers
to remind them that in steam-vessels the compass
was -very liable to be untruthful, and in such
instances the officers were required instantly to com-
municate with the superintendent at Southampton.
They were also enjoined in approaching land under any
circumstances, and especially in dark or foggy weather,
to use the utmost vigilante, and under such circumstances
never to dispense with the use of the lead.—(Hear)
hear.) That latter was issued, and was not a dead letter
by amy means whatever. . •
Captain M'Leod, of the Great Liverpool,: who had re-
commended himself by his ability and politeness, was
expected home in a few. days, when a Committee of
three gentlemen would be appointed to -investi-
gate' the matter.—(Hear.) The Board of Admi-
raltyhad been applied to with aview to their
nominating a gentleman to act on- the committee, but
he declined ; but he hoped their application' to the
Trinity Hould prove more successful. He might say,
in conclusion, that when the tribunal before which the
matter would be investigated, should have pronounced
its opinion, that decision should be made as public as
possible.—e(Hear, hear.)
IRISH LIFE PROTECTION BILL. -
Mr: SWITH' O'BRIEN- wished to ask the Right Hon
Secretary for the Home Department if claw es referring
to taxation. under-this Bill, which had been expunged
while the Bill was passing through the Lords, would be
printed when the Bill came before that House ?
Sir J. GRAHAM, in reply, Was- understood to say
that they would.

HANCERY.

A series of orders relative to the drainage of waste
lands, comprised in twenty-one clauses, and signed by
the Lord Chancellor and the Master of the Roils has
just been issued. The preamble to these orders recites
that, by virtue of an Act passed in the Bth and 9ih
Victoria, to alter and amend an Act passed in the 3d
and 4th Victoria, to enable the owners of settled estates
to defray the expenses of draining the same by way of
mortgage, it was enacted that, for simplifying proceed-
ings, and rendering the same inexpensive, it should be
lawful for the Lord Chancellor and Mater of the Rolls
to make orders and provisions for fecilitatine the mode
of application to the Court, and of proceedings hetet.,
the Master or otherwise. Nov, therefore, it is ordered
by the Lord Chancellor and Master of the Rolls, that
all applications made pureuant to such Act and proceed-
ings thereunder, shail he made and cenducted as follows:
1. Any person entitled to land within the meaning of
the said Act, may pie seat to the Lord Cheilee nor or
Master of the Roll, a petition in the loan set tortb;
and to this cyder annexed.
2. The petitioner in any such petition is to mark
du- swot: with the nArne of one of the Vice Chan-
edlors.

3. The Master of the Rolls in the case of any such
petition presented to him and the Vice Chancellor, with
whose name petition shall be marked, may, upon con-
sideration of petition, and without attendan.,e of coun-
sel, solicitor, or petitioner thereon, if he shall so think
fit, make an order on such petition to the efft:ct st t forth
in a form of order annexed, or to such other effect with
such variations as circumstances may require.
4. The Master, to whom reference may be made, to
require proof of deed, will, or other Fstrument, under
which petitioner claims to he entitled to the land, and
other manner in which he claims tide under the same,
but.he is not otherwise to require proof of title to the
land.

5. The Master; if be think it necessary, for due prose-
cution of references, may direct petitioner to serve any
other person interested with notice of proceedings, and
person so set ved may attend proceedings as party thereto,
but if he shall decline to attend, Master may proceed in
his absence, and he is to state tbe same in his report.
6. Master to be at liberty to apply to the judges by
whom order was made, for special directions or leave to
state special circumstances touching the matters referred
to him ; and if he receives directions or leave, to state
the same in report.
7. Proceedings upon reference to be conducted ac-
cording to general rules and, orders of the Court of
Chancery, so far as consistent with these orders.
8. Master's report to be filed in Report-office.
9. Any person interested in land is, within fourteen
days of filing of report, to be at liberty to petition Lord
Chancellor in case reference was made by him, or Vice-
Chancellor or Master of Rolls, in case reference was
made, that report be reviews d.
10. If petition be presented, judge, by whom refer-
ence was made, to take into consideration, and if he
think fit may dispose thereof either by dismissing same
or refer the matter back to Master, with or without
special ord, rs.
11. Judge considering petition that Master's report
may not be confirmed, may direct person interested to
attend, and may, if necessary, direct same to be argued
by_coun7el in open court, or otherwise.

12. It reference back t, Master is made, proceedings
to be as an original referouce.
13. If no petition that report be received is presented,
person who obtained rep irt may, after fourteen days
from filing report, present petiti,,n fur copfirination, and
leave to.make proposed improvements, and petition may
be in form to order annexed.

14. On presentation of last-mentioned petition, judge
by whom references were made to consider same, and to
dispose thereof by confirming report and giving per-
mission asked, or referring matter back to Master, or
dismissing petition, as justice of case may require.
• 15. On consideration of last-mentioned petition, judge
may require attendance of persons interested ; and, if

necessary, may direct matter to be argued by counsel.
16. Order confirming report may be in form to this
order, also annexed.
17. Master, by whom report made, may, upon pro-
duction of order confirming the same, and giving leave
to make improvements, deliver to party who has obtained
order, certificate in form specified.

18. Certificates to be made in duplicates, and copy to
be filed in Report-office, and other copy to pari.
19. Upon application of party to whom cert!ficates
granted, M isier may inquiro what sums of money have
been bona fide expend. d in making permanent improve-
ments in land, as mentioned and certified to be prop. r,
in report, and detra)ing expenses in said Act mentioned,
and upon what terms as to interest and repayment by
imtalments, money was advanced. and Master having
duly inquired into matter, and being satisfied, may make
endorsement on certificate to effect and in form iu this
order set forth.

20. Endorsement to be made in duplicate, and one
copy to be written on parties' certificate, and the other
to be filed and annexed to copy of certificate filed in
Report-office.
21. All orders by Master of the Rolls or Vice-Chan-
cellor subject to be discharged by Lord Chancellor on
petition.

EUGENE SUE.

M. Eugene Sue, whose fictions are at present so po-
pular, was born at Paris on the 10th of December,
1804. The Empress Josephine and her son, Prince
Eugene Beauharnoie, were hie godfather and godmother.
The Sue family is very ancient, and has been established
for many years at Laco!me, near Cannes, in Provence.
It is still represented there by M. Sue, a retired officer
of high rank, and great-uncle to our author. The
majority of Eugene Sue's relatives have been physi-
cians of great celibrity. His great grandfather, Peter,
and his grandfather, Joseph, have left extensive ana-
tomical works ; and to them the French medical
school owes the introduction of the patholoey of
Gaubius, which succeeded that of Boerhaave. Jeseph
arid Jean Joseph both graduated at the Edin
burgh University, and make known to their countrymen,
in numerous translations, the works of the Scotch
school of medicine. Our author's father was chief phy-
sician to the Imperial Guard in the Russian campaign,
and has also published several popular works. Imme-
diately aftt;r the restoration, he became the King's phy-
sician, and lived in intimate friendship with the Empress
Josephine. Franklin, Massena, Moreau, and all the great
personages of the Consulate epoch. He made a gene-
rous bequest to the Academy of Fine Arts of a magi,i-
ficent collection of comparative anatomy, and objects of
natural history, formed in his own family by four gene-
rations of physicians. and which constitutes a gallery in
the Palace of the Fine Arts of great velue. Eugene
Sue himself, according to the wishes of his father, en-
tered upen the medical career. He was surgeon at-
tached to the military suite of the Mtg. ; teen to the
staff of the army in Spain in 1823 ; and also in the
same campaign, to the seventh regiment of
artillery. He was present at the siege of Cadiz, at
the taking of Trocanero, and at that of Turd's. In 1824
he quitted the laud for the naval service. He made se-
veral voyage: in the Atlantic ; and having traveried the
West Indies, he aeternecl to the Mediterranean, visited
Greece, and in 1.828 was prose nt in the- ship Breslau' at
the battle of Navarino. On returning from his campaign,
he renounced, the navy and medicine, and took up his
abode at Paris, where, thanks to the handsome income
he enjoys as a paternal inheritance, he was enabled to
load a life of briliiaet happiness. His favourite occupation
at this time was painting, which he studied at his friend's
the celebrated Gtedin. The idea of turning novel writer
was nut thought of by Eugene Sae till /830, when an i‘lei
comrade of the artilia'rY 4aPpened, in conversation, to
remark that as " Coupe,-
and i‘larryatt had made the sea
romance popular, he °ugh,'
to write his recollcedons, and
create the maritime roman," d, of the French." This
pleased our author. He quitie,:i the paintn-brush anti
viol< tin the per.. Hi, tiret work S "Kirtioek the
Pirate," the suc,:e,:s of which CaUS(',..l him t (.011tifill0 to
write, foliowieg the dictates of a lively and fertile fancy.
Thus appeared in succession numerous works, which
way be arranged in the following order:—Sea WI-minces,
•Kernock the Pirate, Flick and Pluck, Attar Gull, the
Salamauder„ and the Watch Tower of Keatven. Mari-
lime History—History of the French Marine. under
Louis .IV., and abridgement of the military marine
of ever. y people. Historical Romances—Latreaument,
Jean ,Oavalier, and Let,,rieree, , the C,.mmander
of Mal to. Romances of Manners A.-thur, La
Concara t ohm, Dylcytar, L'Hotel Lambert Ma-
Sec., Philosophical and Political Roi;lances
—The Mysteries of Paris, the Female Blue Beard,
and the Wandering Jew, a tale of the Jesuits. Dasaither
Latrew wont, the Pretendress, and several others of great
offect,i moduced in concert with Messrs. Dinaux and Le-
gouve. M.Eugene Sue at present inhabits, in the heights
of the .Faubourg St. Honore, a little mansion covered
with a rreepieg plants and flowers, which overarch the
purist; eile. A fountain plays in his most beautVul of
garde/ u t. in the midst of rocks and sea plants, and a long
close allery, walled in with sculpture and plants, leads
from a .e house to a little outer gate quite hidden under
an artificial rock. The inferior of the houses
compose .1 of very small apartments, somewhat
confine & , and rendered obscure by the flowers
hangir Li 4 down the windows. The furniture is
critnsf ea, with golden nails ; the sleeping apartment
alone, eis lighter, and of a blue colour. There is scat-
tered about a little ofevery style— Gothic, Renaissance,
Fant. estic, and French. The walls of the drae itig room are
old b ,y works of art, painting, and sculpture, varioue cu.
nosh les, family portraits, masterpieces, and works of
&melt .rn artists, his friends. Glorious names shine in
ever) part—Delcroix, Gudin, Isabey, Vernet, &c. A
draw ing of Madame de Latnertina, and some verses
of tb A) illustrious poet occupy a conspicuous place.
One picture in partiaular has a privileged situ-
ation upon canvass, in the midst of the co-
quet! ties of the drawing-room. It is an anchorite
of iabey, of terrible effect, forming a remark-
'4bl" a eantrast in that little temple of luxury. The fuvoui tie
hit 4 dogs, &c. of M. Sue are the subjects of the ma-
jorit: of the remainder, painted either by himself or by
M. AI Fred Dt.dreux. In all these we (hetet traits of
cbs race er, a passion for luxury and strong emotions,
wit la a reaction towards retirement and meditation, an
nligb it sued taste for the fine arts, and a love of animals
and P 1 ants. Among the many authors who may be
"me d successful, few have attained .a popularity so ex-
"si` ae Eugene Sue.—Corn *pendent of Glalote
Exa tail ser.

THE S IYATE or TUSCANY.—The Journal des Debuts
mentions ti tat considerable agitation at present reigns In the Grand
Duchy of 1 •''uocany. It would appear that the extradition of 2,E.
Renzi had ) Cr' ,ally displeased the majority ofi the population. whfch
cannot and ackand why the Tuscan Government should consider
itself oblige i to deliver up to the Court of Rome, this winter, the
individual i r. hose extradition it refused to sanction last summer.
" Of all the : I. rates of Italy," says the Journal des Debats, " i'ascany
is the only o ti (Wry in which the Jesuits have net established them-
selves, and to , that fact may be attributed the peace aed tranquility
which the G) :a nd Duchy has so long enjoyed. 'the Jesuits, finding
that they o 10d not succeed in establishing themselves openly in the
Grand Duct iy, tried to obtain their object by indirect means. To this
end they ir .troL'uced some sisters of the Sucre Coeur, who it is well
knowm are exceklent auxiliaries for the J *sults. Punds were provided, a
suitable ho use was found, and in short every thing arranged for their
installatica tat Pisa ; when on the 21st ult. a large number of the in-
habitants i Af that city congregated apon the square before the cathe-
dral and c) led' Down with the Jesuits ! Down with the sisters of
the Sacre Coeur 1' 11118 little imeute (against which it does act ap-
pear that the Government showed any disposition to act) produced a
great sear ;mien In the L.,'"Yn'
tics and r Tofessors of the Without loss of time several ecclerslas-
b;-,lversity, and other notab.e Inhabitants,
addresses' rho -. ration against the introduction of any ~ • , the time of the mis-
tto the governor n -
ci.—During
establish, flout in 8, a ,"roto..- -Ith the Jesuits. That doeument LAItLy INTELLIGEN
Anne's-street Church, on
plainly s? s . ws, Y way connected 1... -ttmched to their religion, At
andwho valet men
. ‘ ,nary
evening, the 7th instant, the news arrived of Sir R.
who are really... - Catholic unity, think
desire that the abbath
of the J( ouits, a . I world should return t... 'r." „Wet rust," 1 ~. 1, majority of 97 for free-trade. A gentleman, anxious
conclude,
,►.,_e
..nu Or the slaters of the Sauk Caeca ' t'"”eia who .s " a
- the presides a e, `" j'vfnal do Debate, " atilt -the 'lens ... -re
excel .....
• arrival of the post. and as soon as he heard the
4-r the desti 1 the proter Lttto nea of Tuscany. will take b. !..0 9onsideration i v•• xeliz majority', he went to t•hurch, a1(I i tidp. • ,
n which has been •
The UxiversG/ addressed to the Gov** "oaa,
, , ;1 - i,' ,-,' 1• .).- ,1•• .)bt 1.• -.
' Gernza I •
n . >a,—..t., ,- ...nor 01 twit
clatnati, 41 lied 1 , lc, .. • *
t4fering )eell ',stied, at 1. •-ntimis that it. pro- amount of tb.
0 rew.srd of lAA) .0 • ''")` r''''': ''it th, 2flrTi tilt., 4,-or'.cr t:.- tlen..
deiiver 121) p„ ittuard Dela° . '(0 ~, 1 ' ' 'l.
~,tt.
Wizure
, drilki. charged. -r,,4, .1, or Prokowski, and Theophili of a very excellent in,
my' 4"
A li - having excited the people to a considerable numb*,
. -

s•amaty Addies,, was ila,aled
r of the congregation.—Eiffeshire