The Sun.
London, England, 1848-05-02 00:00:00

the lake of Garda, by disembarking at Ponsle, were
repulsed at the point of the bayonet by the column
Thamberg. The volunteers have fortified Rocca
d'Anfo, and garrisoned Vestone. By a prociamatioa
from Venice of the 24th the inhabitants are informed
that the Tuscan General FERRARI was on his march
to the Frioul, with artillery and cavalry, and that
DurtANDo had sent him a reinforcement of three
battalions of grenadiers, chasseurs, and Swiss troops.

WALLACHIA.
We read in the Vienna Gazette of the 23d
" News as been received from Bucharest of the Ith,
and, from Jassy of the 14th. The sons of the the
fiohave been educated at Paris, and a part of th'
nolnaty who have no places under the Goveruuient, have
been greatly excited by the recent events in GerroDY•
The conspirators at Jassy have tried to constrain Priuce
Stourdza to grant reforms, and to free the country fro°
the protectorate of Russia. Sixty conspirators entered.
the palace of the Prince in the night, and demanded ►
't
him the dissolution of the states, the liberty of „,tlf,
press, and the organisation of the National Guard. 11.'4
Prince, under the influence of alarm, granted ull they
asked. Ou the next day, encouraged probably by the.
Russian Consul, M. de Ksotzbue, he caused all the o-
spirators to be arrested, and condi c under strong
escorts into Bulgaria. The Russian C nsul assured 431'
Prince that he might rely upon the .i4pport of
o
and that five regiments were ready to enter Idlcit's;
and maintain the existing treaties. But this attelT.l.o
not likely to be the last. At Bucharest, Prince
has declared to the Boyards that forty thousand Ku!,
stuns weie trepared to enter the principalities, adJurit
(h
the nobles to save Wallachia from such frightful
the'
asters. The movement was thus stopped for
present."

GREECE.
goal
Letters from Athens, of the 20th April,
ell 6
that the National Bank of Greece had been cornP
to suspend cash payments.

QUEEN'S BENCH.—(THIS DAlr)
THE QUEEN 2'. BATTEN AND OTHERS' Court,
This case has been some time before the no.
The defendants were charged with having 6-d
spired together to use the dyeing wateriali
ir
their employer, a dyer in Oxenden-street, for theirthe
own use and profit, therefore defraudin tbe
remployer of his just profits. It appeared batn hid
employment
allowed Butler and the other pera°l3s I and
to dye articles telouging to themselves -oi,
their families. This indulgence -they abused, aCdot.uere
in dyeing on their own account. The defendants or
found guilty of misdemeanour. Subsequently aneboif
plication was made to the court ou their bolsi'
tor an arrest of jadgment, or for a he"' n
they or,
on the
ground that it they were guilty of Iniadewea
were squally guilty of felony, and that the
ha
was therefore bad, and ought to be set aside. sys
Lord DENMAN, at the sitting of the Count cgoo
judgmentNi in the matter. fle said the tbe
•as of opinion that the conviction tiPoll ioed,
indictment was good, and ought to be sustiiiritil
although the evidence adduced at the ltv of
thet have shown that the parties had been
the higher offence of felony. In fact, they °Sale,
evidence have been found g'e
guilty of that:emoted
as well as the minor one, had they be?,aseljeocer
for it, in which case the Court, in passing fit AP'
would have taken the lesser offence into ann°ll—..--
plication refused.

-,------' ri A_ Y•)
t-i TS .1, . )
BAIL COURT.—CL-- 0110'0
(Sittings in Banco, before Mr. Justice Col! ,„,,41.
,cl 4
RAILWAY COMPANY. awe WUJ i
LLANETMVIE RAILWAY COMPANY V. soTil
1 the melt ,
mandamus should not issue to coroPe ,
Mr. CROWDER moved for a rule to•show cr, h Wale
;er unuer the Lan;
Railway Company to summon a J--.313' e awount of
,(VO3,
Clauses Consolidation Act, to asse'iwav end Dock UOOO
pensation due to the Llamethvie itailaied; requirediebYßail'
puny for the surrender of certain
The Llanethvie
South Wales Railway Company it gave the companyl
way Act was passed in 1828, and
power to hold lands for the purposes °I
under the provisiond.l"3
land which the company acquiredriqnV had registere
t.ie
of that Act the South Wales Conir--' "ended that
dii'
their books of reference, but they
coo authority tO
Llanethvie Railway Company had nested in theta to
pose of it, because the property vv" V their line. 6.
required opoo re.
the public good, and they refused taking °:. elf
the,refore to 11'11: the
compensation assessed by a jury. the would el3"rtha
land the South Wales Company
destroy the Llanethvie Railway, but, acting
held the PSee,
principle that the Llanethvie Company ,i_. the
perty only for the public good, and ti at,
..biic gaeo,
Wales Railway had a right to use it for the Pu. mod
the South Wales Company were applying for:tore thes:
mus to compel the Llanettivie Company to r;7.le, Mir
line, which, since the passing of the South "
had fallen into decay.—Rule nisi.
FOSTER V. TEMPLE. Mr Sol
Mr. HOARY applied for a rule calling upon CO,, ill
lan, the Judge of the Westminster County' u-, wile
show cause why a writ of prohibition should no "pd on
in this case. The plaint was issued and duly sere
the defendant in the latter end of March, and itr7ntilf
sented that tho defendant was indebted to the pol—tbe
as the executor of one William Thompson, but 0110
defendant appearing by his solicitor, it turned 00 ,2: to
the name of William Thompson in the plaint our,i'fa
have been Frederick William Taylor, and the jti`:l,
was therefore called upon to dismiss the case, and ii
Of
suit the plaintiff, which would have had the eneen",aa
destroying the liability, as at this time the debtige,
barred by the statute of limitations. The Learned Ju the
however, ;refused to accede to the request, and tiVilo'
authority of the 12th rule made by the Judges for rd 0
lating the practice of County Courts,
second summons to be issued dated on the saraefeigae
the former plaint, so as to bring the debt within trof the
cute of limitations. It was contended on the Parvitop a
defendant that the Judge had not the power be 000
debt alive in this way except only where it coal", ",,,-of the
that the summons issued before the expirsta`°-the pre'
debt, could not be served on the defendant, au t-, argue'
he direcVo
sent application was made to enable counsel •,- Said
and the Court to decide, this important Pcnri"
nisi.