The Sun.
London, England, 1846-09-23 00:00:00

14„
INDIA HOUSE=4TIIIS DAY.)
ne
,quarterly general court a directors was held this
item,
r the Eest India House, Leadenhall-street, for
toet",l?o,se of transacting the routine business of the
,
1,04 . and also to take into consideration the mu-
,e) int(2h an Hon. Proprietor (Mr. George Thump-
th, 4(1 given notice--namely, "To call the attention i
p.roprietors to the conduct of the court of direce
ee„,`Ta Prefer. certain charges against that body in I
Sit7l with the case of the deposed Raja of Sattara."
tEtt ZP,„ Flom Bart, took the chair, and on his
1/4 depot ea were 3,Lated Henry St. George Tucker,
The,PY•chairrean, Major Urquhart, &c., &c.
kr•
min of the previous court having been read,
"s of the m
"
oved that the minutes of the proceed-
''tors. p, 'ur-st court be printed for the use of the pro-
thei, was surely not the intention of the directors
put Proceedings should be held secret; and, if not
,°kt e. °tie, how were the people of India to ascertain
Lee
„ere the proceedings of that court, and how they
riirtqueeted by them? The lion. Member concluded
tte)P°siag his motion, which, not being seconded, fell
ground.
k'elt.titlea of certaiva returns were then read; also the
4Apritcer.tain papers ordered by the court on the 7th
rend 6th. of July last.
It • jolt") ON again proceeded to address the court,
41,4.,
°ti interrupted, by the, Chairman, who called on Mr.
4rl :r h°ll3p se.ii to Peoceed with his motion.
oil Tutren;soN Nunderstood that a notice of
, aro. Jaen given by the Hon. Proprietor behind
h the,' with the sanction of the Court, he should
Ark,. '• that Hon. Proprietor should precede him:
few words from the C RDIAN
rce HAI ,
Dili:'.3tTLL/PAN proceeded to call the attention of the
:: to the cirCumstances ending the seizure, for he
etti hot dignify it by these ame of conquest of Sinde.
\'§etear, from Mr. G. Thompson.) He did not wish to
fills .°l3on that Court the whole history of the teansac-
lklita that country, but he felt that it was ieuciembent
),tee.,.hiat to refer to the latter occurrences in that
elie'LY. The Court would recollect th'.l sa7,-Ing of the
'iitten`cor-General, " that nothing heat the clearest
%I)l.„_.ce of the treason of the Ame'ers could justify him
Ceeeding to extremity against them." These men
ell Proceeded against, eend torevicted, because they
t4ii 3 It was termed, been di:covered writing treason-
etters to the Raja of Ls.",aore. The Hon. Proprietor
'!re
titious. Lieut. Zw t °ceeded to show th
i‘e
Sid 'at the alleged treasonable letters ,
is writing to Major Outram,
4
'las, he Was unable, to produce documentary evidence"
,141)e.rt of the_ charges against the Ameers, because,
‘,ltl).'ee4ll3B,,etrtco, trusty messengers bad been intrusted
NPy communications. It would but require a
`aarlPsniall of proof indeed to satisfy Sir
See Napier, who when he went to Sinde
t,k that he wanted but a pretext to coerce the
he tTt.. Did he ask the Princes of Sinde to disprove
ei? 'tunable letters? Did he show them those let-
Nri &NO- When they were asked for, they were in-
that they 'were in Calcutta; they went to
and were there informed that the letters
‘ India- Was there any shadow of justice
Aid , Yet tkee historian of the victims in Sinde
ttlitll3o
.7,,audace*.ty to declare that his brother (Sir
tom al3;•es.) had sifted these charges to the
gh'Oh. es_ • •
,e"" would read the extraordinavy passage
I,‘o4thed this glaeleg misrepresentation. The
Nes.' °,peietoe did eo, and then proceeded to read
tt'om tho work of Major-General Napier, cone-
t„r Upon their. as he went on, and showing from
z;.loily of Major Outram himself that many of
1,411t0f. 4Pier's movements were insane in a military
q~alview, nod most unworthy and ungenerous in a
'ense- When the Court some years before had voted
1/4 tr tliQ
(14 ~nitSs to Sir C. Napier for his services in India,
13,ilivan) was the only proprietor who dissented,
ed " acquaintance with the Sinde papers bad
titie. 'en him the conviction that Sir Charles Napier,
r„,,e;lllce entered upon hostilities, was determined to
t'veeim Inuit he had crushed them. It was then endea-
:ts, by those who justified the vote of the Court to
14,t, that Sir Charles Napier was only an inc.erior ser-
.etttteiting under the orders of a higher Court. He
r;Posi„,eavoured to show that he had after' diametrically
`e to the orde,. received !rove the Governor-
i 411, but •
ereor
h. prize money to the areenint of 60,000/.,
.a
th !I) of 10.;0°0/. a year, the colonelcy of a regt-
Irtei .c ins:igni a of the Bath, and a peerage, were
qtlityinean_itw,is to the perpetration of a monstrous
tt, how was the whole of this tragedy wound
e'e imprisonment of several of the Ameers,
i if te'. had received the assurance of Sir C. Napier
OD 'Pay remained quiet no harm would come to them.
00'3 up by the imputations of the most shameful
ier being thrown upon them. And who were the
i%htwho were thus treated? Were they the enemies of
41, ? No; they were her benefactors. They were
kt ?!3 men who assisted Geeieral Nett and General Pol.
;etik)Qtheir Caubulexpedfition. He would cite the highest
k1e.1437 in the mine° to prove this fact. (The Hon.
tlstie tor quoted freem the work of Mountstuart
lee
ea'Lta corroboration.) He could conceive how this
&leaned and no ale-minded man must have wept as
StetePlated th'e fantastic tricks wlfich were played
ti.tet4 country— *en that country ;With he bad so much
t;;ieratlr,° e°fiserAdate by his tv.sdom, his integrity, and
aeh bi",,rl—Celear, hear.) He had felt it his duty to
,[his -Rie to Sir Charles Napier, but he believed
\iters
.srml the'. the originator of all these
°+n d all this outrage was Major Outram.
' /31It it was not yet too late to do an act of
e,ers, lams not yet too late to restore Sinde to the
'Vic' A° conquest of that country was an act of
ki„44 .",Y, '•
only exceeded, if possible, by the attempt to
•A,,, It' any person would take the trouble to exa-
4:t it was of India, he would see to demonstration
klifed, hut Ilut a further extension of empire they re-
-1141 Attar the assistance of a frienely power, who would
k e times united with them in the. bonds of amity.
po,:wer they had
.once Sind° ; that
PoWer lee affirmed they might have" again. The
Leittieroprietesr concluded by moving— That in t e
°xi of th.is Court the restoratien of Sinde to the
„Yes is a measure called for by'bonsiderations of juss -
q),:,.lk3und poli, and economy, tad that the Court
tis..et,ors be instructed to take such'.steps as they
ink expedient for the fur;nerance of this object.
dn DICKINSON second:ed, and Captain EASTWOOD
Died the motion.
!t'ilPlitc•roie, whose 'name we could not ascertain, de-
°gee ,Colonel Outre;m, tend defied any one to show a
et) t.astance in whie'n that distinguished officer had
,A,hesieed to avoid tine shedding of blood.
Cuarnetele said that he trusted the object of
wilhe!lra'bie Proprietor bad been gained by the state-
har% been made before the Court, but it
ireetr,-x:Po' Jted that he, as the organ of the Court
taken-I.'e should shortly state what steps the Court
in,
Js, had " the matter of Sinde. The Court. of. Di-
-1:,411g Nritten to the Governor-General in India, re-
tct lira to investigate the subject, and to favour
160 b 4 with his opinions upon the policy which
en adopted towards the Ameers
,- received
of
buntry. When that reply was reced
lets `'erectors
would not lose a moment in
Ita**l4e the communication before the proprietors.
eeeePa the Hon. Proprietor would, under such circum-
N4' see the necessity of not pressing his motion to a
`' ld "ArLLIV IN, on the assurance that the subject
have ft le earliest consideration from the Court of
,set
fill? °rs, would withdraw his motion.
Tualtesme did not see why the manifes-
-1,;144 0(:1. theix feelings should be endeavoured to be con-
this t day. The question with regard to Sinde
1st?" Tr, ere matter of speculation ; theydealt with
cel
1411‘Ellfrpi LIVRIOTT rose to order.
AIRMAN said the Hon. Proprietor was strictly
Oth • concE THOMPSON was aware that he was so,
Son. Proprietor opposite, like his (Mr. Thomp-
N u wi.l genius, ever rose when he attempted to ad-
•
hkltti le Court. The Hon. Proprietor then proceeded
vitiate the allegations of Mr. Sullivan with re-
,kiend -t the incapacity, civil and military, of Sir Charles
t,,4111 .in Sinde.
Motion was ultimately, after some desultory dis
sstl'att. withdrawn.
° Court, after the transaction of some formal busi
,
I) oke up.
41v

Y OF LONDON REGISTRA-
-014, TioN.—(THIS DAY.)
Rev:sing Barrister, Mr. Arnold, resumed this
papg. 'Alf) examination of the householders' lists for
'44() P
-',13.9.3 included within the wards of Aldgate and
e
‘:rerseers of these parishes were not in attendance
~„
opening of the Court at half-past ten o'clock.
laltioLD immediately proceeded with the parishes
"her "owri in the list, and gave notice that in every case
aie the .overseers neglected to attend he would refuse
‘4ttliFtl tl eir certificates of expenses. The Learned
t‘vq, jetnan alsr, gave notice that he would audit the
gej,"rs' a ecf,unts on the same days in which the lists of
Thresr.mcrlve parishes were revised.
eye enrar*.icular cases determined during the morning
- 'no marked importance.

"j'AIVYLEBONE REGISTRATION.
(THIS DAY.)
!ti. this Morning the Revising Barrister held his court
list7° re,viston of the list of voters for the Paddington
and also for disposing of the objections which
1:)14ri'll over yesterday evening at the closing of the
1,0'4'4 the vestry-room of St. Pancras .
tit 41'1. OF NOTICES.—THE PADDINGTON parish
DISTRICT.
"1-
011 s to any of the claims or objections being
▪ i..
et a gentleman named W.B.Perry, banded in a pro-
Otit. against the Revising Barrister proceeding to revise
as ust of voters for the Paddington district, inasmuch
1)0i,11,.° notice that D. C. Moylan, Esq., had been ap-
tlie-'ed to revise such list had been posted, in accord
with the provisions of the Act, upon the church
pora
In the parish. Ile had himself been objected to,
,it '41,,,he was most anxious to support his protest, because
berou by the merest chance that he heard where and
vihom he was to meet this objection.
o tle:REvisiNG BARRISTER said he could take no notice
AlCme.protost lodged by Mr. Perry, neither should he
ter* :it to influence his disposal of the votes coming
hot°l.°.,, him. In consequence of the returning officer
ue.ving properly authcrised any person to act for
Lot [l.l his absence, he (the Revising Barrister) would
to e able to give the lists when concluded in revision
se,ae p roper party, until Mr. David Salomons should
The
authority from Paris.
" Paddington lists were then gone through.

r-OArc AND WATER.—This article, simple as it is,
thilrel37 well prepared. Cut an upper crust of bread as
hot slain as it is usual for toast; brown it carefully,
4)4 see that it be not burned, smoked, or black; pour
till Lt as much water as is required, and cover the jug
" is cold. A slice of thin cut orange or lemon peel
eutised with it improves it greatly; it should be made
sunY in the day during the summer, and placed in the
astn.";_.
.hen it may be drunk with impunity.—Kitton's
"`'`ica4 Xeclicinc.