The Sun.
London, England, 1846-06-20 00:00:00

the Administration, trusted the House would bear with him
while he addreaed a few remarks upon this subject. He shad
felt for that great Micaister feelings of the irtost profound ad-
miration, and although he did not sympathise in the politiCal
measures of Mr. Canning, he ye£ viewed with geeat disappro-
bation the course pursued by the Right Lion. Bare-net at that
period. The Noble Lord, the Member far Lynn, hie' brought
forward certain charges against the Right Hon. Vaionet.
He would not attempt to repeat them, but he trust say, th.‘t he
gave the utmost attention to them, and he bad no reason !or
thin cl'
ing them to be true, 'on the contrary he had every reason'
to believe that they were untrue. He was confirmed in this
impression by his distinct recollection of Mr. Canning standing
up in the House, and saying in a marked manner that for the►
resignation of the Right Hon. Baronet he was fully prepared.
He considered, therefore, to use the Right Hon Baronet's own
words, that the charge attempted to be set up against him had
been completely shattered.—( Hear, hear.) With refer-
ence to the general state of politics, he was, like
the Noble Lord, prepared to vote with him, and
against the Right Hon. Gentleman, but he could not help
qualifying that vote by exprerising his great regret teat he
should be obliged to do so at a moment when he was conduct-
ing to a triumphant issue the greatest question which perhaps.
had ever been agitated in that House..—(Hear,)
Mr. VILLIERS said that he did not consider it beside thew
question to ask to what side Mr.-Canning. if he were alive,
wculd attach himself.—( Hear, hear.) They had hears
wonderful professions of respect and veneration for that illus-
trious man, but the Noble Lord was allied at the very
moment with that very party who had hunted him to deztb.—
(Hear, hear.) The Noble Lord had identified himself with
the very party and the very principles most opposed to that of
his illustrious relative ; and what was the reason that he was
assailed in that bitter spirit? It was because he had attacked
the corn monopoly. That was the occasion for all the
bitterness of feeling which had been manifested, and
he was attacked precisely in the language which was now
used against the Right Honourable Gentleman. It was the
law of 1815 which the landed interest were attached to. Mr.
Canning
do away with it and carry out free trade; and the., he could
saw its gross imposition, and ho was determined ter
assure the House was the reason he was insulted aand then
assailed. And now the Noble Lord made these ctaarges.
He had identified himself with every enemy of Mr. Cant: mg.
wit
htrue his? Heg onerous w
How, then, and with what grace could he make them, even if
athliecye,
were was
ssa
itre
sptlraitt, which was his cha-
Mr. Canning, if he were-
alive,
would join heart and soul in the great move-
mentn which they were now about carrying ont.—(Hear*)
The party which the Noble Lord represented. had )(slued in the
cry,what
o l l beewLeaaosurtdsheek their
questione
w t
iiems
these
hfeenditaswt immediate
were
einterests he
hde i.werecould,intellg attacked.? hiTrn The
h. V by
cha-
racter of the Prime Minister. The people took no interest in
a certain point of view in the question, bnt be could tell the Noble
Lord that they received with unmitigated disgust
the per-
serial attacks which had been made upon the Right Hen. Gen.
denian ; and there was one class in the country who would
take no interest in it, and that was the British farmer, of
when they were always talking. They brought evidence
against the- Right Honourable Gentleman of nineteen
years' standing.—( Hear, hear.) And ;for the last ten
years they had been always preaching to the British farmer
to put their trust in the Right Hon. Baronet. Although
they had this evidence in their pockets against him, and they
had been telling the British farmer that he was the
only man who could lead 4hem safely:7and /securely,
and that he was the only man who was trust-
worthy, with what decency could these charges have been
brought forward? The Noble Lord had drawn a distinci.ien
between following the Prime Minister and following Lora.,
Stanley. Why, Lord Stanley followed the Right Hon. Baronet,
and the Noble Lord bad followed Lord Stanley, and where was
the difference though the distinction bad been taken. Did or
did not the Noble Lord follow the Right Hon. Gentleman ?
( Hear, hear.) The Noble Lord had professed that he was
exceedingly shocked by treachery to party. Why, he must
recollect that his leader (Lord Stanley), when he used to cross
the House, after he changed his opinion, was met with such
jeers thatihe had at last to sit upon the side of the House:front
which he had seceded. Yet the Honourable Member for
Lynn, who followed that Noble Lord, wsas shocked—
exceedingly shocked, at treachery to party.—(fiaear, hear.)
The public were beginning to be worn out by .he personal
quarrels of that House.—( Hear, hear.) The public; looked
upon such personal matters with disgust—they looked upon,
these personal attacks as disgraceful to the House—disgracaafel
to its honour and dignity, and disgraceful to those who main':
them, and to those who took part in them. His opinion was,
that the result of those attacks would be, that instead of
damaging the Right Hon. Baronet, it would but exalt him in
the estimation of the public. —( Hear, hear. )
Mr. STAFFORD O'BRIEN said that he was the only
Member in that part of the House who escaped the
sweeping censure of the Honourable Member who
had just sat down. The Honourable Gentleman
had made a charge against a Noble Friend of his
(Lord Stanley) with having changed his principles,
and the great reason why the Honourable Member had
charged the Noble Lord with change of principiaas was not
that he had swerved from his principles entirely, btif that he
had done so by introducing the Canada Bill. The Hon.
Member had charged that part of the House with ha'ing
offered an opposition to this measure wholly uncalled for, said
the result of which was only to delay the passing of the mime
sure. He felt that this charge of protracting that debate was
not only uncalled for, but that it was only consistent with
the character of the ouse that that debate should have been
a lengthy one ; and compared with the great magnitude
of the question, that its whole bearings should
have been discussed. It was quite consistent with
the character of the House, that whenever a great
change was proposed it should be freely discussed, and
he was sure that the Hon. Members who differed from him on
that question, and he would say the Right Hon. Baronet him-
self, would not think that the opposition to the measure had
led to any uncalled-for delay in the progress of the Bill.
Mr. VILLIERS explained. What he had said was not
properly understood by the Hon. Member who had just sat
awn. He had stated that the opposition of the great landed
proprietors to Mr. Canning was occasioned by his advocacy of
free trade,
Mr. PETER BORTHWICK rose amidst considerable
laughter. He did not wish to take part in the personal squab-
bles which bad that night occupied the time of the House, for
humble as was his dignity, he did not think that taking his
share in such matters would add one atom in the way of en.
tilting his position. He said, however, if he had reason to
thank the Hon. Gentleman for the compliment which bad been
paid to himself. Ile was sure the Right Hon. Member for
'famvrorth had great reason to regret that. the Hon. Gentleman
had taken upon him his defence.. Never had any- one
more reason to say, " God defend me from any
friends" than had the Hon. Memter for Tamworth
to-night, when the Hon. Gentleman rose to defena
(The Hon. Gentleman eat down amidst cries of "Divide,"
and " Adjourn.")
An Hoar. MEMBER, who moved that the debate can the Pro-
tection of Life (Ireland) Bill should be adjourned to Monday,
remarked that he understood such was the expectation of the
Right Hon. Baronet (Sir James Graham) from what had
fallen from him.
Mr. HUME here pointed to the clock, it being but twenty
minutes past eleven o'clock.
Sir JAMES GRAHAM consented to the adjournment,
which was agreed to. -
CHURCHES BILL.

--..
Mr. HODGSON moved the second reading of this Bill,
and explained its nature and provisions.
Mr. HENLEY would object to the second reading unless
all the alterations proposed as to the levying of the poor-rates.
and the appointment of parish overseers, were struck out.
Mr. HUME would object to the second reading if the sug-
gestion of the Hon. Gentleman who bad just sat down were
carried out, as the Bill would then become useless.
But he objected to it in its present form, first,
because it recited twelve or thirteen Acts of Parlia.
went which ought to have been r..-pealed; and secondly,
because it authorised three-fourths of the inhabitants
to raise rates for the building of churches, despite the remain-
ing fourth of the people. He there.ore moved that the Bill
should be read a second time that day six months.
Sir 11, ELPHINSTONE said that he quite agreed with his
Hon. Friend that the present system of repairing churches, by
means of church-rates, was a very bad one ; and where a dis-
trict containing several parishes, having a large church, existed,
it would be under the necessity of levying a separate rate in
each parish. This Bid removed such a necessity, and it should
therefore have his support.
After a few words from Mr. HAWES,
Sir J. GRAHAM said that the effect of the present
Bill would be to render the law more complicated than it now
existed. The first object of the i3lll he was disposed to believe
was effected by the existing law; and with regard to the other
two objects, he had an insuperable objection to them, for he
was not disposed to carry the power of building churches by
church rates further than the present law allowed. He thought
that it ;mild be better to adjourn the question, in order that the
Bill might be considered by the Law Officers of the Crownize
and afford an opportunity of introducing a Bill which would be
better calculated to meet the objects in view.
Sir K H. INGLIS concurred in the view taken by the
Right Hon. Baronet. He thought an adjournment for ten
days would give an opportunity for re-considering the Bill.
Mr. B. ESCOTT thought the clauses were so objection.
able that the Bill ought to be thrown out at once, instead of
trying to amend it in Committee.
Mr. HODGSON defended the details of the Bill against ti
objections which had been urged against it.
Mr. W. MILES thought the inhabitants of parishes, who
might be called upon to subscribe under it, would have great
objections to its provisions.
The second reading of the Bill was then negatived without a
division. i
CLERK OF THE PEACE AND CLERK OP THE
CROWN (IRELAND) BILL.
Lord LINCOLN obtained le
that the office of Clerk o f
the
pre to hring in a Bill to provide
ace and Clerk of the Crown in
Ireland should be hereafter filled
ereaSter filled by the same person.
PUBLIC BATHS AND W ASH HOUSES.
On the motion of Sir G. GREY,
Leave was given to bring in a Bill for promoting the volun-
tary establishment, in boroughs and par&bes in England and
Wales, of public baths and wohh"s"' t
The House adjournedat a Quarter pas Twelve.

riADVI!RTISEAIENT.j—BRUSHISSe...NEW INVENTIONS.
The Triple Hair Brush. One stroke of this is equal to the
effect of one penetrating, five small-tooth combs, and one even-
cut brush ; to be had in four sizes, No. 7, be. 6d No. e, 7s.
6d; No. 9,9 g. 6d. ; No. 10, 115. 6d. The Double Anti-
pressure Nail Brush, which does not divide the quick from the
nail, no pressure being required, and thoroughly cleans and poi
lishes the nails in a tenth part of the time of any other mew
thod; price in bone, No. 1,2 s. ; No. 2,2 s. 6d. ; No. 3; 3s.
6d. ; No. 4, as. ; and of all sizes and prices in ivory. The
New Tooth-pick Brush, which entirely enters between the in-
terstices of the closest teeth ; marks, full-sized brushes. No. is
hard ; No. 2, less hard ; No. 8, middling ; No. 4, soft. The
narrow brushes, No. 5, hard ; No. 6, less hard; No. 7, mid-
dling ; No. 8, soft, at ls. each, or 105. per dozen in bone; ant
2s. each, or 21s. per dozen in ivory, the hair warranted 110Yer
to come out. The Medium Shaving Brush, between the
usual badger hair and bristle brush, being a selection of the
strongest hair only from the badger skin in a variety of sizes,
both in bone and ivory. The above articles are the inventions
of Ross and Sons, 119 and 120, Bisliopsgate-street, London,
and, being protected, any one imitating them will be proceeded
against.

f ADVERTISE3IENT.] - SIGHT Art) 'TEARING. - 39,
Albemarle-street, Piccadilly. —Newly-invented 'Spectacles, Tele.
scopes, Opera Glasses, Microscopes, &c. Patronised by General.
Sir Edward Paget, Sir Evan Lloyd, Sir John Neatings,
Frederick Goodfellow, Clayton, Grosvenor Morrison, Dyott Robe rt.
son, Mackenzie, Galway, Biggs, WooL4 ~Idurrs,,y, Walker, Fox,
Price, Lindsay, and Thackray ; Major Generals .Sir A. Elphinstone,
Sir John Ross, Sir James Cockburn, .Achlnty. F. FP'rs, 1). Macleod,
Beuverie, Sir J. Macdonall, Sir R. Barton, Sir T. Dallas, and Sir
. ,
Wm. Eustance: Admirals Lord John Hay, Sir O. Coelzburn, Gtr
George Munday, Sir George Martin, Sir James 11.,Whitsheds Sir D.
Gold, Bess, Alexander, Curzons, TomPkinscas ,Hckins, and Prim.
Vlce-.S.dinind Sir F. A,usten;. Rear-Admirals Brawn and. Itihonleau.
&c. Mos:Sr*. S. and B. Soloraons, nptiCialls, have itiyented Spy.
tads Lenses upon a new construction. Immediately they are pittetd•
before imperfect 'vision, that mist and dullness which appear he,tot.e:
the eyes is at once removed, every obiort becomes clear andlitatinet,
so that the, most aged impertect sight becomes bright and. briutam._
and is brought to its youthful, natural, and original state,
Achromatic Telescopes, Arati:,
opera Glasses, Microscopes, 'alit hie tuit
kinds of Acoustic Instruments, for relief of most extreme deafn
Caution—Messrs. S. and 11. Solomon, Opticians, tirii not in any wap
connected with a person of the same name in their immediate
bourhood. To prevent mistakes be cautious, and Observe-o'ly t:
slot id 99, Aloe-street, Picoadilly, opposite the York itotst.-