The Sun.
London, England, 1846-05-26 00:00:00

GROUP XX.

This Committee met to-day at twelve o'clock, Mr. Sotheron In
the chair, when the case of the

ZONDON, ,ROI7NSZOW, AND WESTERN
was resumed.

Captain Moorsom, civil engineer, was re-called and cross-examined
at some length in reference to the evidence given on Friday on the
engineering peculiarities of the line, but no point of material im-
pori,:nee was elicited.
The examination of Captain Moorsom continued up till four o'clock,
when, the Committee adjourned till to-morrow at twelve o'clock.

GROUP XXII.
This Committee sat at the usual hour, Mr. B. Denison, chairman.
E=IITM2,IrECIITIL AND DO.R.CI7IZ_S_T_Env.2-11. X)
""°l\r' SALIS"" "'imXeda'thuis moTing by
The crcss-examination of Mr. Locke was
Mr. BuNcE. The cross- exaudnaton was conreihsu. d exclusively to the
opposition of landowners along the Wit.. e
opposition was gone into,
The landowners along the line, wh
were the Earl of Digby and Mr. Bridges, represented by Mr. Butt;
Mr. Frampton, represented by r. Sergeant Kinglake ; the trustees
of the. Warciou' m
r estate, for whom 3l
r.Murphy appeared, and Mr.
Gordon, who appeared personally, and examined Mr. Locke at some
length himself.
Mr. Cockburn awl Mr. Merrewether having re-examined Mr.
Locke at considerable length,
Mr. Vignoles, C.E., was then examined. He considered that the
Mr. Locke between Exeter and Yeovil was better
linein e
ver proposed by
respe:l than the line as laid out by Mr. Brunel, on the part
of the Great Western Company.
The Committee having intimated at this stage of the examina-
tion th at it would be useless to examine other engineers, who would
merely corroborate the evidence of Mr. Locke,
Mr. MERREWBVIER offered, on the part of the promoters, to with-
drn his witness provided that the promoters of the Great Western
coin:et ly cont'ned their engineering evidence to ere witness also.
*iins proposition not having been acceded to by Mr. DENISON, on
the nart of the Great Western Company, the examination was pro-
ceeded with, but m consequence of the lateness of the hour was
brought to a close very shortly afterwards by the Committee ad-
journing.

GROUP XXVI,
SOUTZt ESSEX.

The Committee assembled this morning at twelve o'clock, Mr. M.
O'Connell in the chair, when evidence was resumed on the part of
the North Gray..send Railway in opposition to the South Essex line,
and Mr. Meeson, a large proprietor of chalk-pits at Grays, and seve-
n! other witnestes, were adduced to show that the proposed advars-
ttges wou:d not be nearly so great as they were supposed to be at
present.
This closed the case of the South Essex Company ; after which
Mr. Itonweee opened the case en behalf of tne hiver Lea Naviga-
tion trustees, by reminding the Committee that even in these
times of railway mania, as he termed it, the benefits of canal
communication had been entirely overlooked, although at the present
time the trustees were successfully competing with the Eastern
Cou tics Railway. It was well known that many of the places
within a short distance of the proposed line were already in
the neighbourhood of railway communication ; so that the
necesc:ty for any change in the means of communication
was quite evident. Tire Learned Counsel then went into a detail of
the plans for crossing the river Lea which Mr. Locke had submitted,
and endeavoured to show that, in consequence of the Lea being a
tidal river, these plans were very injurious, and intimated 'that he
should call Mr. Walker, the eminent engineer, as well as the engineer
of the Lea Company, to show that they were objectionable,
not only on account of the influx of the tide, but because
also of the opposition that would be offered to the egress of the
waters collected in the marshes of Essex. On the part of the River
Lea Company, ho proposed that there should either be a bridge
of 100 feet, or at least one of 8.5 feet, with a towing-
patlt under, and a lay-to, by which the boats
could be launched. Considering all the circumstances he trusted that
the Committee wsald see that there was no necessity for the rail-
way at all, or if they allowed the preamble of the Bill, that they
would at least preserve the rights of the River Lea Company as they
were, and as they had been secured, by several Acts of Parliament
for two or three hundred years. The trustees had no
private ends to serve, and were persona of the highest
respectability, and had only the public interests to serve. He
might add that the Eastern Counties and the Northern and Eastern
Counties Companies had acceded to the terms of the company. Mr.
Bodwell then called

Mr. Merchant, clerk to the trustees for twenty years, Stated•that
the parties were of the highest respectability. That the tonnage
carried under the proposed bridge was 300,000 tons, the tolls for
which were expended in the improvement of tke river. The naviga-
tion extended from Hertford to the Thames, besides the branches to
Hogstone. The site of the proposed bridge would pass in precisely
the very worst part of the navigation, and the Company had already
expended between 16,0001. and 18,0001. on is improvement.
Mr. Mausn cross-examined the witness, to whom he replied that
the bridge to which allusion had been made had fenders under it,
which restricted the water way, but that difficulty was
likely to be obviated by the substitution of a swing bridge, which
would allow a greater water way. A proposition had been made to
settle this matter by the arbitration of two celebrated engineers, but
it was refused by the Company on the ground that they were the
best judges of the necessities of the navigation, however succinct the
engineers might be. Bridges had been obtained from other compa-
nies of 94 feet and of 61 feet span, but none of 1,:0 feet span.
To Mr. Ronwett's re-examination Mr. Merchant replied that their
had got from other companies all that they required, and they only
came to the Committee because this Company proposed to restrict
their water way.

Mr. Griggs, surveyor of the Lea Company, described the course of
the navigation, and stated that this was the worst part of the navi-
gation, and be believed that the plan proposed by Mr. Locke would
amount to annihilation of the navigation. In the course of the eke.
mination an endeavour was made to show that the objection was
futile, but it failed.

Mr. Walker, engineer, was then called to show that the bridge
would Impede the navigation, unless the arches were of sufficient
width. The witness then went into the principles of the several bridges
proposed for crossing the Lea, and showed that the bridge proposed
by him would be cheaper as well as better than that proposed by
Mr. Locke. The bridge to be constructed over the Tamar for the
Cornwall Railway was to be 250 feet span, and that over the
Drogheda Railway, supported by iron work, was to be of the
same span. The effect of contracting the stream would be to
increase the velocity of the stream, and to break the banks
below the bridge. Ile thought, upon the whole, that the Company
had better give the 100 feet at once.

Mr. Warner and several other practical navigators bore testimony
to the difficulty of the navigation at the particular spot, the tide
running sometimes as much as nine or ten miles an hour, and acci-
dents had frequently occurred. The chance of accident would, of
course, be increased by the erection of the proposed bridge.
On the cross-examination of Mr. ADAMS the witness described the
course of the navigation and the impediments which were presented
to it by the set of the stream and tide. The ordinary length of the
craft on the river were about eighty feet long, exclusive of the rudder,
which was nine feet. TI era were other bridges as narrow, but there
was no place so narrow with so strong a tide as thin. Nor is there
any portion of the river so tortuous as this. The principal difficulty,
however, would be experienced chiefly by the London lighters whick
were worked by one man only. lie spoke from an experience of
thirty-five years, and he believed that the bridge woi:ld largely in-
erease the chance of accident.

Ur. RoDwELL was prepared to adduce four or five other barge-
masters, and especially the chief barge-master, who would state that
if this pier were erected, he would not venture to send the valuable
cargoes up the Lea which he had hitherto dispatched, but

The Committee declared that they were eatiefled, and adjourned
till twelve o'clock to-morrow.