The Sun.
London, England, 1846-01-26 00:00:00

TAILLOIV.

This market keeps pretty steady, and although there may
have been during the past week one or two parcels sold at
from 3d to 6d per cwt (for cash down) below- our quota-
tion, yet we believe fine Y.C. suitable for the best
purposes of the trade cannot be had under 435. Town. Tal-
low 43s net cash.

CHANCERY.—('riIIS DAY.)
The LORD CHANcELLoR sat in his court at Westmin-
ster at eleven o'clock.

CHAPIgAN b: CLIFTON.—JUDGDiENT.

liis.Loaosnir gave judgment on this appeal motion
from the decision of the Vice-Chancellor of England;
His Lordship was of opinion that the judgment of the
Court below was correct, and dismissed the appeal mo-
tion with costs.

ROLLS' COURT.-(THIS DAY.)"
His Lordship resumed the hearing of causes, which
were part-heard.

VICE-CHANCERY.-(THIS DAY.)
His Honour the VICE• CHANCELLOR of ENGLAND was
occupied the whole morning with a motion to dissolve an
injunction in the case of Sauter v. Grant.
31ILNE V. WALTON.
The arguments in. this part-heard appeal occupied the
Court the remainder of the morning.
- (Before Vice-Chancellor WIGRAM.) •
EX PARTE GUILDFORD, CHICHESTER, AND PORTSMOUTH
RAILWAY.
•
Application was made in respect to the money,
937,7501., paid in under the standing orders of- the
House of Commons, to have it invested in the pur-
chase of Exchequer-bills.
His HONOUR made the order.
EX PARTE OXFORD AND CAMBRIDGE JUNCTION.
Application was made that 32,3871., paid in under
the standing orders of the House of Commons, might
be laid out in the purchase of Exchequer.bills. The
order was made accordingly.

QUEEN'S BENCH.—(THIS DAY.)
(Sittings in Banco, at Westminster Hall.)
BODMORE V. BUTTERWORTH.
From the statement of counsel, it appeared that this
case was an applicatiOn for a new trial of a question as
to the infringement of a patent. The trial took place at
the after sittings of last term, before Mr. Justice Wight-
man. It appeared that the plaintiff had invented certain
very material and important improvements in the ma-
chinery for cleaning, carding, roving, and spinning
cotton and wool, by a process called " surface motion,"
a system totally unknown before, particularly in coiling
and uncoiling. The principal novelty, as stated in the
specification, consisted in the winding of the cotton or
wool on the rollers by the motion of the rollers them-
selves, described already as " surface motion," instead of
the motion dependent on the motion of the roller's axis
as practised in machines hitherto in use. At the trial
the jury found a verdict for the defendant in two issues,
and they were discharged in the other. And the pre-
sent appfication was for a rule to set the verdict aside,
upon the grounds, which were stated at great length by
the Learned Counsel, that the inventions of the plaintiff
were bona fide and of the greatest possible importance to
the public. The case was entered upon at the sitting of
the Court, and some very beautiful and elaborate models
wereplaced before the Bench, which the Learned Counsel
explained the operation of with great particularity.
(The case had not closed when our report left.)

vX.CIIEQUER.—,r Is
, (Sittings ►u ilaueo.)_
HALLET V. VIGNAY.
This was an action of trespass which was originally
brought by the plaintiff in the Common Pleas to recover
compensation from the defendant in the shape of

1)A )