The Sun.
London, England, 1846-08-06 00:00:00

true he had scarcely sufficient physical force to go through
the details ha had to lay before the meeting, for he had but
just arrived from travelling, but yet his heart wes
anxious, and hit mind was strengthened by the magni-
tude of the occasion.—(Cheers.) Ile was convinced
that so much good to the country was never tendered by a
Government, and so much prudence and discretion were
never so necessary on the part of the people.—(Cheers.) He
regretted the dissensions which had got amongst them, but
he (Mr. O'Connell) asserted that they had only stood by the
principle of moral force, the principle on which ho com-
menced his agitation.—(Cheers.) That principle had guided,
and would always guide his entire conduct. Yes, he had
only to remind them how often he had said, " That the
greatest amelioration of human institutions was not worth
the shedding of a single drop of blood."—(Cheers.) They
had lost many who had hitherto dignified th'at association
with their talents, and he must especially feel heartfelt and
bitter regret at the secession of William Smith O'Brien.--
(Hear.) When they were under prosecution, Mr. O'Brien
at that moment of personal danger threw himself into their
ranks and soon became; one of the foremost amongst them.—
(Cheers.) Mr. O'Ceaenell, after saying that he had not com-
promised any of his principles, went on to say, he did not
justify himself ; lee required no justification. Ile maintained
his old position, and laughed to scorn those who prided
I themselves oet a species of pocket courage—( Laughter)--vio-
lent men Wren talked of lighting when there was no lighting
to be deate.—(Cheers.) Mr. O'Connell then charged the
Younglreland party with getting up the late dissensions in
the association in his absence, and then went on to observe
that they seemed plainly to accuse him of coalescing with
the Whigs. One young gentleman had said that the people
would be betrayed. Now by whom were they to be betrayed ?
It was not his sweet self lie meant.—(Laughter.) He meant
him (Mr. O'Connell).—(llear, hear.) In his absence that
was insinuated against him. That gentleman was followed
by three or four others of the same party, and when pressed
to say who they meant, they said they meant nobody. That
was the first time he (Mr. O'Connell) was called nobody.—
(Laughter and cheers.) The Learned Gentleman then pro-
ceeded to answer the accusations of the Young Ireland party
relative to the late Dungarvon election, and made the same
explanations as to the election of Mr. Shell as had been
given so frequently by other members of the Old Ireland
party. He said those views had been put forward only for
the purpose of creating dissension, and cried shame in those
who had brought it forward for such a purpose.—(Cheers.)
He (Mr. O'Connell) in 1840 called on the association to dis-
approve the declaration of Lord Ebrington, " That a Repealer
should not obtain office under the Government," and he was
joined in the cry by the Nation and " Young Ireland ;" in
fact, all parties agreed in disapproving of the course pur-
sued by the laerdeLieutenant.— (Cheers.) 1\ hen he and
they acted (ea this principle, why should they not rejoice
to find that they had a Lord - Lieutenant who would
not consirt,er a Ree; pealer disqualified from holding &l ice on
that ae,:ottnt?—(Hear, hear.) The moment that Lord
Besteeeo
,rough trampled down Lord Ebrington, and made a
(le'elaration to that effect, up got the Nation and Young Ire-
lanii, and called every one who dared to accept office an
apostate, showing that their former declarations could not
have been sincere, or that they were then insincere.—
(Cheers.) several young gentlemen of talent, family, and
fortune, frequently told him (Mr. O'Connell) that they could
not join the association, lest they might be injured in their
prospects, although ardent Repealers; and if the Nation
newspaper and the Young Irelanders were really true to their
colours, would they not have been delighted at a declaration
of that nature made by the Government, which would have
the effect of adding to their ranks many young men, both
Protestants and Catholics ?—(Cheers.) He (Mr. O'Connell)
had reason to know that it was the opinion of Lord Besbo-
rough; that Repealers should not be excluded from office
because of their politics ;—indeed, he would pledge himself
to the sentiment, and he was sure the people of Ireland
would regard such a man as he ought to be regarded.—
(Cheers.) What was the next thing the Young Ireland party
suggested? Why, that they should become physical force
Repealers—advocates of murder and robbery.—(llear, hear.)
They became revolutionary force men—they profess doctrines
contrary to the fundamental principles of the association,
and such as would prevent the Protestants of Ireland from
joining them—(Cheers)—in fact, if they were to placard the
streets to that effect, they could not have been more trea-
cherous to repeal—he would therefore arraign them all with
treachery, with the exception of his friend, Mr. W. S.
O'Brien, who was a man of honesty, honour, and truth.—
( Hear, hear.) The next matter he wished to allude to was
one of great importance, and one on which he would move
a resolution ; he alluded to the Nation newspaper, and its
connexion with the association.—(Hear, hear.) He would
move, " That the committee should consider whether there
be any connexion between the Repeal Association and the
Nation newspaper; and if so, if it was for the safety of the
association that it should be continued." Now he (Mr.
O'Connell) believed that no such connexion existed, for
he did all in his power to prevent it after and even before
the State prosecutions.—(Cheers.) The very moment that
the song of "Who fears to speak of '9B ?" was published—
which by-the-by was written by a Fellow of Trinity
Ct liege, Dublin —he severed the connexion ; but, not-
withstanding, a bench of judges was got to decide
that he was bound by that song; a decision that he
would call monstrous and profligate.—(Cheers.) They might
send judges again, and they should be prepared for them, and
not let themselves be again involved by the Nation, and, as
counsel for old Ireland, he would keep them out of all scrapes.
—( Hear, hear.) The Learned Gentleman then proceeded
to read several passages from the articles lately published
in the Nation, and said they were clearly in favour of physi-
cal force, and were such as would involve the association,
and would have had him convicted and executed for high
treason, if read and raised in evidence against him on his
trial.—(Loud cheers.) Two indictments for treason were
actually prepared he 1843, to be sent to the grand jury, and
would have been sent, but they adjourned before it was sent
up, and the Government altered their mind.—(Cheers.) It
was also said that M. Ledru Rollin offered assistance, and that
it was offered by " a surer source" from France. Now he (Mr.
O'Connell) admitted that it was offered by M. Ledru Rollin.
publicly, and refused publicly; but he denied that any other
offer of assistance was made to the association, publicly or
privately ; and, if offered, he called on and defied the Nation
to say to whom it was offered; and if it was proved that even
his beloved son John joined in the reception of suet a 'propo-
sition, be would have him expelled from the association.—
(Cheers.) Were they safe in dealing with newspapers which
advocated such doctrines?

A VOICE—No, we will turn them out.—(Cheers.)
Mr. O'CONNELL add they should do no such thing; for,
if they did, they would be only acting as the people fooliz hlv
acted when they burned Mr. Beresford's notes, because
they disliked his bank.—(Cheers.) The Learned Gen-
tleman then referred to all he had been able to do
for Ireland by moral force, and asked what the ad.
vocates of physical force had done ?—(Hear, hear.)
It might be said, he had not been successful for the repeal.
His answer was, "Wait awhile." But, had not the repeal
agitation really done anything for them ? Had it not kicked
out the Coercion Bill ?—(Cheers.) And had it not made Sir
R. Peel turn from orange into green, and to declare that " Jus •
Lice should be done to Ireland?"—(Loud cheers.) And they
had also Lord J. Russell's promise to pass the most compre-
hensive measures for the good of Ireland. He would sup-
port the present Government as long as they endeavoured to
do justice to Ireland; and while they did so he would do
everything in his power to assist them : but he was bound
to admit that he did not think they could be successful in
their favour.--(Hear, hear.) (The Honourable Gentleman
then eulogised the new Government for the late official ap-
pointments they have made in this country, and alluded to
those made by the late Administration, which elicited hisses
and groans.) There was also the restoration of their magis-
trates.—(Hear, hear.) He (Mr. O'Connell) was not a
magistrate when he last addressed, them, but he was one
now.—(Loud cheers.) He feared he would have been
unable to address them to such a length as he had
done; but he found that when he came to Ireland he
grew young again.—(Loud cheers.) It was strong evi-
dence in favour of the repeal cause that the Times news-
paper spoke its sentiments in their behalf.—(hear, hear.)
The Times showed the opinion of the majority of the
English people. In fact, all classes of people, both in
England and Ireland, were coming to an opinion that
justice should be done to Ireland. The Learned Gentleman
concluded by moving that it be referred to a committee of
the association, to ascertain if there was anything between
that association and the Nation newspaper of a dangerous
character, and which might call for a severance of the con-
nexion.

The motion was seconded by the Lord Mayor, and carried
with acclamation.

Several subscriptions to a considerable amount having been
handed in,

Captain BRODERICK, in alluding to the election of Dun-
dalk, eulogised the conduct of the Repeal Club there, as it
was, he said, to their exertions the success of the election was
owing. He moved a vote of thanks to the Repeal Club and
the Repeaters of Dundalk for their support on the occasion in
question.—Carried.
Mr. J. A. O'NLEILL (Bunowen-castle) was speaking against
the proceedings of the Young Ireland party when post hour
arrived.
The week's rent will amount to about 4001.

PRICE OF GOLD.—The premium on gold at Paris is
16 per mille, which, at the English Mint price of 31. 17s.
101/1. per ounce for standard gold, gives an exchange of 25
55; and the exchange at Paris on London at short being 25
75, it follows that gold is 0.78 per cent. dearer in London
than in Paris. By advices from Ilamburgh the price of gold
is 436 per mark, which, at the English Mint price of 31. 17s.
101,4 d. per eunce for standard gold, gives an exchange of
13 101/2 ; and the exchange at Hamburgh on London at short
being 13 1134, it follows that gold is 0.57 per cent. dearer in
London than in Hamburgh. The course of exchange atNew
York on London is 107% per cent., and the par of exchange
between England and America being 109 23-40 per cent., it
follows that the exchange is 2.33 per cent. against England.
But the quoted exchange at New York being for bills at 60
days' sight, tie interest must be deducted from the above
difference.

GENERAL HOLIDAY AT MANCIIESTER.—Monday was
observed at Manchester as a general holiday, in commemoration of
the passing of the Act for the repeal of the corn-laws, and a more
I magnificent public procession in celebration of a great national event
was never before witnessed in that town. Business was entirely
suspended, not only the retail concerns, but the factories and ware-
/ houses remained closed during the whole of the day. Flags and
banners bearing appropriate devices anti mottoes were to be seen
suspended front almost every house and public building, whilst the
crowd of persons that thronged the public streets rendered it very
difficult to force a passage at even a moderate pace. The procession
of the corporations of Manchester and Salford, the late Anti-Corn-
law League, gentlemen of the boroughs, the fire-brigade, and the
various trades and societies in the town, was formed at eleven
o'clock at Larahill, Salford, and dispersed, after having
moved through many of the principal streets, in St.
Ann's-square, shortly after two o'clock ; the weather
during a greater part of the time being very unfavoura-
able. The great numbers and length of this procession may be in-
ferred from the Met, that nearly an hour-and-a-half had elapsed
from the time of the first band entering Market-street, to that of the
last vehicle arriving opposite to the Exchange. The banners and
flags carried by the different bodies were very numerous, and bore
suitable inscriptions in favour of free trade principles. Amongst
others were noticed —" Long life and happiness to cur free-trade
Queen Victoria ;" "God bless Sir Robert Peel, the poor man's
friend," &e. From the late League rooms a rich banner was sus-
pended, bearing the motto of " The League triumphant, June 26,
1846." In the evening the illumination of the various public build-
ings, and many of the great factories and warehouses, was on a
very extensive scale ; particularly at the Free Trade Hall, the
Theatre Ro,al, Salford Town Hall, and the warehouses of Mr.
Potter, Mr:Cobden, and Mr. WAIL. A public dinner was held at
Salford Town Hall on Monday night, to celebrate this auspicious
event. It was presided over by the Mayor, Mr. Kaye, and very
numerously attended ; and furnished a very happy close to the in-
teresting proceedings of the day.
occasioned EVENT.—Considerablo sensation has been
""..ioned In Leeds by the deaths of Mr. Joseph liebblethwatte.
druggist and shopkeeper, residing in Charles-street, Quarry-hill, it:
that town, itna las wi
has not yet been inyea??gtZ
rumours that are afloat at.
the
eanoLSwahtilierhdah3:yleasiedt.
ted it would
taking poison, grits
vhararking dbe unfair to give the various
wife, and his then 28
eministered by the husband to hi-
tA;thlehpea:tais;
deadly ingredient himself. Mr
riebblethwalte was about 25 years
very respectable family, but both he and hisd
erall y conjectured de
aofo jrme csetomumrb member
ttoihrf'.li
past led somewhat irregular lives, and it
theL9)iit p
oison(opium) had been taken voluntarily by himself at leas.
twhether or not by his wife may probably be never brought
light. The Leeds borough coroner has Opened an inquest on to
bodies, but 110 evidence will be adduced before this (Wednesday)
evening, to which time the inquiry was adjourned on Monday last.
Fleet-street, stating that the thoroughfare
STOPPAGE OF FLEET-STREET.-0a Tuesday, notie,
was posted at each end of
,rond,ty next, the 10th Lastant, by order of
would be stopped after
the Lord KAM!

THE BISHOP OF EXETER AND

BRIDGETOWN CHAPEL.
HOUSE OF LORDS, August 4.
The following is a fuller report than appeared in our yes-
terday Morning's Edition :
The Earl of RADNOR said that he had given notice of his
intention to make some remarks on the statement made to their
Lordships relative to the conduct of his Noble Friend the Duke
of Somerset, who was unable to attend in his place. The
attack had been made upon the Noble Duke without any
notice, and he had therefore had no mear,s of answering it
himself, or of asking any friend to reply to it. The charge
made against the Noble Duke was for violating an express
engagement with respect to the endowment of the chapel at
Bishopstown ; and the history of the transaction was this:
the Duke of Somerset had considerable possessions in the
county of Devon, in part of which there was need of addi-
tional church accommodation. In the course of the year 1832
the Duke of Somerset built this chapel for the purpose of
accommodating the population. It was completed in the
spring of that year, and was inspected in the cour,e of
the mai. mer by the Duke and the Bishop of Exeter. Some
communication took place between them as to the consecra-
tion, and the intention of the Duke to make an endowment.
The consequence was, that early in the month of August the
Duke entered into an arrangement with Mr. Shore to do the
duty, and agreed to give him a remuneration cf 2001. Some
doubts arose on the question of preferment, and the tilia?el
was not then opened. Communications subsequently took
place been Mr. Moberly, the Duke's solicitor, and the
secretary of the Bishop; three or four letters passed, and
without any endowment taking place, and without the conse-
cration of the chapel. the Bishop granted a title to Mr. Shore,
who was duly nominated by the then incumbent of the living,
Mr. Edwards. Mr. Edwards afterwards died, and a gentle-
man named Brown surceeded him, and continued to hold the
living till 1844, Mr. Shore during all that time doing the duty
of the chapel, and no difficulty arising. In the summer of
1844 Mr. Brown entered into an arrangement with a Mr.
Cozens, who came in July to reside on the incumbency, and
objected to Mr. Shore's doing the duty, and refused to nomi-
nate him ; and the Bishop thereupon refused to grant a license.
Some judicial proceedings took place, and ultimately the
chapel was licensed under the statute, and the chapel was
opened for the performance of religious services according
to the doctrines and liturgy of the Established Church.
The incumbent proceeded against Mr. Shore in the
Ecclesiastical Court ; but still the chapel had continued
open to the present time, and the services had been per-
formed to the great satisfaction of the congregation. The
Duke was accused of bad faith in having violated a specific
engagement entered into by him never to allow the chapel
to be used for ether parposes than those of the Church of
England, and secondly to endow it ; for the Bishop said that
when he licensed the chapel there was a positive engagement to
endow it. Now, with, respect to the first point, he did not
see, on reference to the act, that it was necessary a chapel
should be a Dissenting place of worship because it was licensed
under the Act. The certificate under which it was opened
was granted by the archdeacon, and the registrar objected that
it did not specify the place to be a. Dissenting chapel, but the
opinion of Mr., now Mr. Justice Erie, was taken upon the
subject, and he was of opinion that it was not necessary to de-
clare it to be a Dissenting place of worship because it was
licensed under the Act. In point of fact, however, it had not
been used as a Dissenting place of worship, for it was used for
the services and the sacraments according to the rites of the
Church of England. But the principal accusation was, that
the Noble Duke had forfeited his engagement that he would
endow the chapel ; and to show the groundlessness of that
charge, the Noble Earl read the correspondence which had
taken place between Mr. Moberly, the solicitor of the Duke,
and the Bishop's secretary, in which the Duke had no doubt
stated his wish to make an endowment ; but, as some difficul-
ties mightarise as to the patronage and other matters, made no
pledge upon the subject. The Noble Earl then read the fo'
lowing correspondence:—

" Bedford-row, Sept. 12, 1832,
" Sir,—l begin to apprehend that the mutual object of the
Duke of Somerset and the Bishop of Exeter will not be at.
tamable hut through the medium of the Church Building
Commissioners. It will require some consideration to deter-
mine what proposition to lay before them on the subject. It
may also turn out that the Duke's apprehension of its being
necessary to let the twelvemonth go round is well-founded ;
and this would be so much waste time, for the chapel is ready,
I believe. It seems to me also that it might assist the Duke
in determining definitively what he might be inclined to do
relative to an endowment, &c., if an experiment could be first
made how the chapel is likely to answer. Under these con-
siderations I should heg to suggest that it would be better to
request of the Bishop, in the first instance, a license as if it
were a proprietory chapel only, which need not by any means
imply thsreby that the idea of endowment and consecration is
abandoned. The opening of the chapel in this way will, in
the course of a few months, probably enable the Duke to judge
what may be the best arrangement to propose for the ultimate
adju.tment.—l am. &c., " JOSEPH MABERLY."
To this letter 111 r. Barnes replied :
" Sir,—l have taken the earliest opportunity of laying be-
fore the Bishop your letter of the 12th. The Bishop directs
me to say that the Doke of Somerset having stated his wish
and purpose to endow the chapel, and to convey the same for
consecration, the Bishop will license the chapel till that
purpose can be carried fully into effect. The Bishop has further
directed me that, having himself seen the chapel, he dis-
penses with the issuing of any previous commission of inquiry.
It is only necessary, therefore, that the Duke should sign a
petition to grant the license, and I will draw a form and send
it to you, For this purpose you will be good enough to direct
a plan of the chapel to be furnished, showing the ground plan
and scaling, &c., and be good enough to give me the most
concise statement possible as to the title—that the Duke is
tenant in fee of what other estate.—l am, &c.,
" RALPH BARNES."
On receiving this letter, Mr. Maberly wrote, on the 22d of
September, as follows ;
" Sir,—l beg to acknowledge the receipt of your favour,
which, with your request of a plan, &c., I will immed'ately
communicate to his Grace, and I doubt not that I shall be
commissioned to return his Grace's thanks to the Bishop
and yourself for your obliging attention. I write, however, in
consequence of some expressions in your letter, and to pre-
vent all possibility of any future misunderstanding, unlikely
as it may be, to arise. 1 think that the communication of
the Bishop's consent to license is accompanied by words from
you, that, if unqualified and unexplained, would amount to
an implied engagement on the part of the Duke, at all events,
and under any circumstances, and with whatever incon-
veniences attended, still peremptorily, to endow and convey
the chapel for consecration. As the Duke is a man who
would be scrupulous to the letter in the performance of
every iota of what he could be considered, either directly or
by implication, to have engaged for, it becomes the more
necessary for me to take care that his Grace does not lay
himself under any obligation calculated, by any possibility,
to bring him into a dilemma. It is his Grace's most
serious and determined intention and wish to do his best,
through the medium of the Church Commissioners or other-
wise, to procure the consecration of his chapel, and to make
for it a permanent regular endowment of proper amount.
With the expression of this intention the Bishop will, I
doubt not, knowing his Grace's attachment to the Establish-
ment, feel satisfied and rest contented. But it is possible
that there may be impediments, unlooked-for requisi-
tions, objections made, interference with patronage, or
the like, that may make it unadvisable, in the view of
his Grace, or of any reasonable man, to proceed to the
conveyance for consecration, and may rather induce his Grace
to wish to wait till some further legislative regulations afford
better facilities, or remove difficulties that may in the present
state of the law exist. I must, therefore, claim for his Grace
a discretion in these matters beyond what your words convey.
That the Bishop is content that the Duke should have this I do
not doubt, nor do I think that you meant to imply to the con.
i
trary; but f you read again your words, I think you will find that
the qualification is necessary which I have here taken the liberty
to make. I will send you the plan, &c., as soon as I receive
it, and shall be obliged by the form of the petition you propose
to send me.-1 am, &c. "JOSEPH MABERLY."
Mr. Barnes replied to Mr. Maberly :
" Exeter, Sept. 25, 1832.
" Sir,—l have consulted the Bishop upon your letter of the
22d. The Bishop's authority, as stated in my letter of the 10th,
was founded correctly, his Lordship thinks, on the previous
communication ; but the Bishop, on perusing your letter,
authorises me to say that he is content to license the building
on the declaration therein contained. I shall be glad to give
every dispatch to the business on your furnishing me with the
matter mentioned in my former letter.-1 am, &c.
"RALPH BARNES."
The Noble Earl concluded by contending that the Duke of
Somerset never had entered into any contract to endow the
chapel in question.
The Bishop of BATH and WELLS said, that he had never
heard of the difference which had arisen between the Duke of
Somerset and the Bishop of Exeter until he received a letter
from the Bishop of Exeter on the subject. As he wished to
occupy the attention of their Lordships for the shortest pos-
sible time, he should confine what he had to say to the fewest
possible words, and therefore he should proceed at once to lay
before them the letter which he had received from his Right
Rev. Friend

" Bishopstowe, Aug. 1, 1846.
" My dear Lord,—Lord Radnor having informed me that
it is his intention to bring forward a discussion respecting a
statement made by me in the House of Lords on the 23d of
June last, on occasion of the precentation of a. petition
from the Rev. James Shore, which statement his Lordship
considers as having cast an imputation of bad faith on the
Duke of Somerset, I request you to ask for me the indul-
gence of the House (as was recently accorded to the Arch-
bishop of Dublin) in permitting me, in this letter to your
Lordship, to state the reasons which prevent me from
attending in my place when the discussion shall come forward,
Those reasons are stated in a letter which I wrote on the 28th
ult. to Lord Radnor, a copy of which I request you to read to
the House, as well as a copy of the letter to Lord Seymour,
referred to in mine to Lord Radnor, and of Lord Seymour's
answer to me, all of which I now enclose. I further
request yeu to state to the House, after reading that answer,
that the newspaper transmitted by me was the Western Times,
of Saturday, the 25th ult., that it was put into the envelope
in my presence by my solicitor, in his own office;
that it was sealed by him, and put into the post-office
at Exeter by him ; that my solicitor took the pre-
caution of marking the copy of the Western Times, so
placed by him in the envelope, with my letter ad-
dressed to Lord Seymour ; aed that he and his clerk
declare, and will be ready to testify, that neither of
them ever had in his possession a Gloucester Journal,
nor, to the best of their recollection, ever saw one—
that it was, therefore, absolutely impossible that such a paper
should have been inserted in the envelope before it was
put into the post-office at Exeter. I will add, that I
myself have not for many years had in my possession, nor even
seen, a Gloucester paper ; that I could not, therefore, hive
transmitted such a paper to Lord Seymour. •
" I am, my dear Lord, yours most faithfully,
" H. EXETER.
" The Hon. and Right Rev. the Lord Bishop
of Bath and Wells.
" P.S. I think it right to add one or two brief passages
from the reported speech of Lord Seymour, on which I offered
to meet him before a jury :—' He (the Bishop of Exeter) rose
calmly and deliberately to make this statement. It is a calm,
deliberate, collected statement, and I proceed to show you that
that that calm, deliberate, and emphatje statement is a delihe.
rate falsehood.' Again, ' Therefore he (the Bishop) not only
made a charge diametrically contrary to the truth; but he
made a malicious charge, for the purpose of giving a false im-
putation to the individual in question.'"
This was the letter which he had received. Now, with the
permission of the House, he should read the copy of a letter
addressed by the Bishop of Exeter to the Noble Earl near him
who had just addressed the House :

" Toruay, Jul 2 1846.
"My Lord,--Being in Exeterßishopstowe, this daqy, I havey received the
letter of yesterday's date with which your Lordship has ho-
noured me, intimating your intention of making a statement
in the House of Lords, at the desire of his Grace the Duke of
Somerset, in order to remove the imputation of bad faith
which, in my speech of the 23d of June, I cast upon him.'
I thank your Lordship for saying that you should be unwilling
.bat this should be done in my absence,' and expressing your
• hope that I will let you know, at my earliest convenienf-e,
what day will suit me to be in the House.' It would have
given me very great satisfaction to haveavailed myself of your
Lordship's courteous and candid proposition, had not circum-
stances occurred which have rendered it imperative on me to
forbear at present from personally bearing part in the dis-
cussion. Those circumstances are, indeed, such as may
possibly induce your Lordship to reconsider your purpose of