The Sun.
London, England, 1870-01-22 00:00:00

THE SUN, LONDON, SATURDAY EVENING, JANUARY 22, 1870.

JOINT-STOCK BANKS.

Closing Basilica s
Share NAlits. Paid. Price done.
10 Agra Limited, A all 11 111 121
al Do B lO 41 Of
50 Albion
00 Alliance, Limited
20 Anglo Austrian
20 Anglo-Egyptian, lira all 22 22 211 5
20 Anglo-Hungrian 8 11 21 83
20 Anglo-Italian 1866, limited 10 5 4
40 Australasian
20 Bank of British Columbia all 11 13 141
20 Do issued at 2 pm.— , 5 '5 4
25 Bank of Egypt
20 Bank of Otago, lira.
25 Bank of South Australia all 30 32
50 Bank of Victoria, Australia 25 37 39
10 Bank of New Zealand all 151 101
50 British North American
20 Chartered of India, Austra-
lia, and China all 13 19
25 Chartered Mere. of India
London, and China all ;31 3 I
20 City lO i l 111
100 Colonial 25 1 1
10 Consolidated, lim.
50 Delhi and Loudon, lint
50 East London, Lim
20 English and &minima, lint 10 21 11
20 English Bank of Rio de Ja-
neiro. lim
20 English, Scottish, and Aus-
tralian Chartered
281 Houg Kong and Shanghai
Bank Corporation all 36 38
281 Do new ll4 4 5
100 Imperial, Jim 2O 16 16
20 Imperial Ottoman lO 21 21 121
25 lonian all 1) 22
25 Do new 5 6 3
Lud Mortgage of India, lira 4 31 31
100 Do sp. c. Debs.lB64, 30 all 76 76 b 0
100 London Bank of Mexico
and South America, lint. 20 5 4 151
100 London and Brazilian, lim. 45 35 ZO
20 Do new 71 541
100 London &River Plate, lim. 40 11 13
25 Do new 10 11 2 p
20 London Chart.of Australia all - 23/ 241
20 London and County 2O 491 501
50 Do new, iss at 20 p.m, 16 pd ll
London Joint Stock
London and South African al
100 London &S.-Western, Um, 20
50 London & Venezuela, lim_ 121 ..- •••
100 London and Westminster. 20 671 581 601
100 Do Scrip, iss at 10 pm. ..... 20 ... ...
100 Merchant, lim 25 64 51
10 Metropolitan, lint all 71 74
00 Midland, lira • 2O 11 1
5 National of Australia
25 National of Liverpool, lint. 15 35 ip
00 National I'rovinc. of Eng'd 42 ... ...
10 Do
50 National. 3O ... ..
20 New South Wales all 41 43
20 North-Western 7l
25 Oriental Bank Corporation all - 41 42
50 Provinc. Bank. Corpo., lim lO 61 51
30 Provincial of Ireland 25 9i 92 BCI
10 Do new. all ... ...
100 Stand. of Brit. S. Africa, lint 25 14 13
100 Do issued at 6pm lO 8 6
25 Union of Australia all 46 4
100 Union of Ireland, lint
50 Union of London l5 37 38

10 Pr 1p

31 .:321 33:
11t

13 11

AiTEALS PROM TIM ICI TO or
REVISING BARRISTERS.

The Court of Common Pleas, consisting of the Lord
Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Willes, and Mr. Justice Brett,
devoted the whole of Friday to the hearing of registratory
appeals :
In " Gainsford v. Brown," Mr. Sohn Coulson, a Wes-
leyan Methodis minister, had been disqualified at Rother-
ham in respect of his house belonging to the Wesleyan body. •
The revising barrister held that Mr. Coulson's occupation
was necessary to the performance of his duties as minister,
and disallowed the claim. The case not having been pro-
perly stated, their lordships suggested that it should be
struck out, as it was a most important one to Dissenting
ministers. At the same time, Mr. Justice Brett remarked
that this must not be taken as an intimation that there
was any doubt about the law, which was clearly that when
a minister was required and bound to live in the house as
part of his duty, he was disqualified.
" Piercey v. Maclean" was an important case, as
affecting in a similar wanner about 500 City
merchants. The respondent occupied two rooms in the
City, and carried on the business of a wine merchant. Ile
had an outer door, and took the keys away every night, •
the landlord having no control over the rooms. He
paid the rates and taxes. The objection was made on
the ground that there was no such structural severance
of the counting-house from the other part of the hpuso,
as to constitute it a counting house in the meaning of the
statute. The revising barrister disallowed the objection
and allowed the claim. Their lordships affirmed the de-
cision.

The question in the case of "Waller v. Birks " was
whether the Rev. ➢lr. Birks was such a perpetual curate
of the parish of Holy Trinity, Cambridge, as entitled him
to vote. The court decided that it was not a legal but an
equitable right, and allowed the claim.