The Sun.
London, England, 1846-05-19 00:00:00

THE HOUSE OF CO

Voted on the third reading
English county Members absent
(pairs included)
English borough Members absent
Welsh county Members absent
Welsh borough Members absent
Irish county Members absent
Irish borough Members absent
Scotch county Members absent ..... .
Scotch borough Members absent
Sudbury vacant ...
The Speaker

I 222
'Conger•
ivatives

Libe-
rals.

Total.

MEMBERS NOT IN PARLIAMENT, 0
NOT VOTE ON GOING INTO COMM]
WHO VOTED ON THE THIRD READ.
Fos. FREE TRADE.
Armstrong, Sir Andrew Araitland. Thomas
Arundel and Surrey, Earl of Milton, Viscount
Bellew, Rich. Montesquieu Newry, Viscount
Duff, James Ogle, Savile C. H.
Dundas, Frederick Ponsonby, Hon. C. F. A. C.
Grainger, Thos. Colpitts Powell, Caleb
Hallyburton, Lord J. F. G. Ricardo. John Lewis
Hollond, Robert Rice, Edward Royd
Johnson, General Rich, Henry
James, Sir Walter C. Romilly, John
Lincoln, Earl of Rutherfurd, Andrew
Lindsay, Hon. Captain Somerset, Lord Granville
Al'Dorinell, Joseph Miles Watson, W. Henry
FOR PROTECTION.
Alexander, Ni;fhaniel Eaton, R. Jefferson
Archbold, Robert Forman, Thomas S.
Archdall, Captain M. Hildyard, T. B. T.
Bentinck, Lord H. Lasceiles, Hon. Edwin
Blakernore, Richard Mildrnay, H. St. John
Burrell, Sir Charles M. Morgan, Charles
Cresswell, Baker 'Trevor, Hon. G. Rice
Denison, W. J. Williams, T. Peers
Dowdeswell, William

t WHO DID
[TTEE, BUT
ING.

SUMMARY OF THE DIVISION.
MAJORITY (INCLUDING TELLEAS).
Conservatives

Liberals
-• 329

MINORITY (INCLUDING TELLERS).
Conservatives
Liberals ••• • ••• 9
.-- 281
Absent (Conservatives) ... 46
Ditto (Liberals)

- 95

1
... Speaker
Seats Vacant—Sudbury

Mr. Colvile was prevented attending the division on
friday night in consequence of severe indisposition.
---..........--..—......

CAUTION AGAINST LENDING NEWSPAPERS lOR HIRB.
—This custom having hecoma very prevalent, to the serious injury
of m wspaper proprietors, we recommend to the notice of persons so
offending the following clause from the 29th (leo. 111., c. 50, sec. 9 :--
" No hawker of a newspaper, or other person, shall let out a news-
paper for hire to any person or different persons, or from house to
luet6s, on pain of forrviting AlTo poundo."—DrioNl

MEETING OF. PROTECTIONIST
PEERS.
(From the Post.)
On Saturday afternoon a most important meeting of
Peers, opposed to the free-trade policy of the Government,
was held at the Clarendon; his Grace the Duke of Rich-
mond in the chair. Amongst those who were present
were :

Richmond

DUKES,

MAEQUL3.
Exeter.
EARLS.

Cleveland

Cardigan Eldon
Dartmouth Somers
Tankerville Stradbroke
Pomfret Kinnoul
Warwick Egmont
Mansfield Longford
Carnarvon Erne
Cadogan Lucan
Malmesbury Limerick
Lonsdale Charleville
Brownlow Sheffield
Bradford Eanfurly

Hereford
Co mberm ere

VISCOUNTS.

Strangford
Doneraile

BARONS.
Hastings Bolton
Willoughby de Eresby Redesdale
Beaumont Colchester
Sondes Skelmersdale
Boston Templemore
NValsingbam Stanley
Sherborne Abinger
Kenyon
Banning Ashburton
Thegised for the unavoidable
him to state Noble CHAIRMAN Clonbrock.AN apolo
absence of sev
theireral Peers, who had nevertheless authorised
entire,
concurrence in the objects of the
meeting, and their determination to uphold the cause of
protection against the measure about to be introduced into
the House of Lords. The list comprised the names of
DUKES.
Beaufort Buckingham
MARQUISES.
Salisbury Westmeath
EARLS.

Poulett
Stanhope
Ashburnham
Hardwicke
Nelson

Orford
Eglinton
Seafield
Enniskillen

VISCOUNTS.

B.tRONS.

St. John
Northwick

Hill

Feversham
Reap.

The Duke of Richmond having explained the occasion on
which their Lordships were assembled, was followed by Lord
Stanley, who was received with an enthusiasm that was con-
tinued through the whole of the speech, in which the Noble
Lord declared his earnest support of the principle of protec-
tion, and his fixed intention, by all the means in his power,
to oppose the Bill that had just passed the Commons.
Lord Beaumont, Lord Redesdale, Lord Colchester, and
Lord Ashburton severally addressed the meeting in the. same
sense, and the result was an unanimous resolution to lose no
opportunity that might offer for securing the defeat of the
scheme proposed by Sir Robert Peel.

FOURTEENTH REPORT FROM
THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON RAILWAY
BILLS CLASSIFICATION.
The Select Committee appointed for the Classification of
Railway Bills, according to the resolutions adopted by the
House, have further considered the matters referred to
them, and agreed to report as follows:
Your Committee recommend that the West Riding Union
Railway (No. 2) be referred to Group No. 38.
Your Committee recommend that the Dudley Canal and
Birmingham Canal Amalgamation be removed from Group
30 to Group 57.
Your Committee recommend that the St. Alban's, Hat.
field, and Hertford Junction Railway be referred to Group 28.
Your Committee recommend that the Grand Junction
(Huyton to Ashton and other Branches) be divided into two
separate Bills, the one to contain the provisions for making a
Branch from Showhill to Portobello, to be referred to Group
No. 53, the remaining provisions to be included in a second
Bill, and remain in Group No. 52; also that the South Staf-
fordshire (Showhill and Portobello Branch) be removed from
Group No. 52, and be placed in Group No. 53.
Your Committee recommend that the Belfast and County
of Down Railway be referred to a distinct Committee, Group
No. 62.

Your Committee recommend that the Midland Great
Western (Liffey Branch and Longford Deviation) be re-
ferred to Group Ne. 63.
Your Committee recommend that the Irish Great Western
(Portarlington to Galway Railway). and the Midland Great
Western of Ireland (Mullingar to Galway Railway), be re-
ferred to Group No. 64.
Your Committee recommend that the Wexford, Carlow,
and Dublin Junction Railway, and the Dublin, Dundrum,
and Enniskillen Railway, be referred to Group No. 65.