The Sun.
London, England, 1846-05-07 00:00:00

-
LAW INTELLIGENCE,

COURT OF CHANCERY, May 6.
JONES V. HORGAN.
The further arguments in this part-heard appeal from
the decision of the Vice-Chancellor of England, upon
demurrer, were resumed, and concluded to-day. The
question in this case relates to the liabilities of certain
parties who had taken shares in a company, the object of
which was to form a Socialist Society, upon the plan of
Mr. W. Owen, at Arbiston, near Glasgow.
The LORD CHANCELLOR, at the conclusion of the argu-
ments, postponed his judgment.

VICE-CHANCERY COURT, May 6.
(Before the VICE-CHANCELLOR of ENGLAND.)
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL V. THE EARL OF DEVON.
The arguments in this part-heard case were resumed
to day, and the case on behalf of the relatives concluded.
The information was filed by two gentlemen, named
Heathcote and Ha,le, inhabitants of Tiverton, in Devon-
shire, and the object of the information was to obtain the
direction of the Court as to the management of the
Grammar school at Tiverton, in Devonshire, of which
Lord Devon, and several other noblemen and gentlemen
of the county were trustees. The school under their
auspices had become a school for gentlemen's children,
who were boarders, to the exclusion of the children of
inhabitants of the town, for whose benefit the charity was
intended by the founder.
Mr. Bethel!, Mr. Walker, Mr. Blunt, and Mr. Heath-
field were Counsel for the relators; and
Mr. James Parker, Mr. Struton, Mr. Rolt, and Mr.
Palmer, were Counsel for the defendants.
At the conclusion of the case for the relators, the
arguments on behalf of the defendants were postponed
to the 25th of May.

COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH, May 6.
This Court was occupied nearly the entire day in hearing
the arguments of the Attorney and Solicitor-Generals in a
case arising out of an act of the Corporation of Warwick.
The question was entirely a dispute between two political
parties in the town, though it was nominally whether the
Corporation had, by the Municipal Act, any power over cer-
tain public charities.

COURT OF EXCHEQUER, May 4%
Mr. CHAMBIIRS made an application to the Court to change
the venue of a case from the county in which it was about
to be tried to London, or elsewhere. The grounds of the ap-
plication were, that the plaintiff, who was a poor man, had
been prosecuted by the defendant, Sir R. Murray, for an
alleged breach of the game-laws, for which he had been im-
prisoned, and for which imprisonment he now sought to
take an action, as he contended that it was a false
imprisonment; but he apprehended that the defendant had
such influence in the district where the case was proposed to
be tried, that the jury would lean towards the side of the
defendant.

The Court refused the application, upon the ground that it
would be an imputation upon the impartiality of the jurors
to grant it.

POLICE INTELLIGENCE.
MANSION-HOUSE.
Henry Hudson, commander of the steam-boat called
the Bride, plying between Chelsea and London-bridge,
was summoned by Mr. Thomas Howard Fellows, student
at law, of No. 1, King's Bench-walk, Temple, for having
infringed the first of the bye-laws passed by the Court
of Aldermen, and confirmed by Baron Platt. Alderman
Gibbs sat to adjudicate on the case, which, as the most
essential objects for which the bye-laws were made were
comprehended in, it excited a great deal of interest.
The summons charged the defendant with having, on
the 21st of April, unlawfully used and worked the said
steam-vessel for carrying passengers for hire and gain,
without having the registered number of it, and the
number of passengers licensed to be carried therein,
painted and kept legible in such a position and in such a
manner as was ordered and directed, &c., in pursuance of
the statute in such case made and provied.
Mr. Fellows stated that on the 21st of April be got
into the 'Bride steam-boat at one of the piers at
Chelsea, where the voyage, which terminated at London-
bridge, commenced. It was between Yantlet Creek and
New Windsor. Between Blackfriars and Southwark
bridges, on the City side of the river, the defendant
acted as commander, and witness observed that neither
the number of the steam-vessel nor the number of pas-
sengers licensed to be carried was painted on the outside
of either paddle-box, and that in fact there appeared no
number at all. He bad paid the fare before be got into
the vessel. About a month ago he said ho meant to
take proceedings against the boats navigating the upper
part of the Thames, if they did not comply with the
regulations, but he received no answer to the com-
munication which he made to that effect.
Cross-examined by Mr. Cattarns, solicitor to the
Steam-boat Company—There were not many people on
board ; he could not tell how many. He went on board
determined on laying an information, and he fixed his
attention entirely upon the captain on the paddle-box.
He had experienced annoyance and uncourteous
treatment from the steam-boats when even sculling on
the river, and he had mentioned his intention to prosecute.
Mr. Cattarns objected that the bye-law merely related
to freemen, and was not applicable to persons who were
not proved to be free.
Alderman GIBBS said it was evident that if the defen-
dant was not free he had subjected himself to more
severe condemnation an punishment, inasmuch as a
person not a freeman found navigating a vessel was
liable to be committed as a rogue and vagabond.
Mr. Cattarns submitted that in all penal Acts every
thing charged must be proved to the letter, and such
had not been the case in the evidence of the gentleman
who brought the charge.
Mr. Goodman said it was not necessary for a man to
be free in order to be made amenable under the statute.
Alderman GlBBS—Surely it cannot be meant to argue
that because a man is not free, he can do just as he
likes.

Mr. Cattarns said he meant to argue that the bye-
law, which the defendant was accused of having violated,
had reference to freemen alone.
Alderman GIBBS—WeII, we can see whether he is or
is not a freeman. Let the clerk to the Watermen's
Company be called.
Mr. Baryon (clerk to the Watermen and Lightermen's
Company) then proved that the defendant was made a
freeman of that company in November, 1832.
Mr. Catterns took another objection, upon the ground
of the uncertainty as to the wording of the bye-law in
fixing the penalty.
Alderman Grans over-ruled the objection, and fined
the defendant 40s.
Mr. Cattarns said the complainant had not proved
what was at all calculated to justify a conviction, and
gave immediate notice of appeal.
The same defendant was then charged by the same
complainant, upon another bye-law, amongst the same
regulations, with having unlawfully navigated the Bride
steam-vessel without causing and procuring a proper look-
out to be kept from the bow of the said steam-vessel.
Mr. Fellows, in his evidence in the second case, stated
that while the Bride was performing part of the voyage
below Blackfriars and Southwark bridges, and when the
defendant was acting as matter on the paddle-box, there
was nobody at all during a portion of the time in the
fore-part of the vessel except himself (witness), and
there was no one looking out from the bow of the vessel.
Cross-examined by Mr. Cattarns—Witness could not
say how many people were on board. He saw a man
on the bow at one time, but that man did not look like
one of the crew ; neither did he look out at all. Was
not sure what the hour was at which the circumstance
occurred, but it was between three and seven o'clock.
He could not say how the tide was, nor whether the
vessel eased or stopped between Blackfriars and London
bridges.
Mr. Cattarns observed, that the complainant appeared

to have shut his eyes to everything except the object of
endeavouring to fix a penalty ; and the fact of his not
being able to speak of the time within a smaller limit
than between three and seven o'clock, was surely enough
to justify an acquittal in the present case.
Alderman GIBBS said, that the complainant, by ex,
elusively fixing his attention upon the only things which
it was necessary for him to prove, was better able to state
facts, by not allowing his mind to- be distracted.
The penalty of 40s. was also inflicted in this case by
Alderman Gibbs, and Mr. Cattarns gave a second notice
of appeal
William Cadwell, commander of the steam-vessel
Citizen, appeared to answer similar complaints made
by the same complainant.
The defendant had refused to give his name to the
complainant in the first instance, but upon being told
that by the ruftisal he would subject himself to a penalty
of 104 he complied. Witness had been nearly run down
in the river upon one occasion by a steamer called the
Citizen, but he could not say the vessel in question
was that steamer. There was no registered number of
the vessel, nor was the registered number of passengers
painted within the paddle boxes, of which there were
two. There was no look-out at all from the bow.
Mr. Cattat:ns remarked upon what he considered to be
the exceedingly inaccurate evidence of the complainant.
Mr. Fellows said he considered that his evidence was
quite conclusive enough; however he should take care on
future occasions to observe a few more particulars.
Alderman Ginns fined the defendant upon each of the
eases, which differed in no respect from the two cases
already decided upon, in the penalty of 40s.
Mr. Cattarns gave notice of appeal in both cases as
well as in those against the commander of the Bride.
The Lord Mayor has issued 40 summonses to the
commanders of steamers navigating the Thames under
his Lordships' jurisdiction, for acting without being free
of the Watermen's and Lightermen's Company, by which
the proceedings are undertaken.

__S .
o—n I
Friday,MP Ol 1 T Ai
twelveßE
/LOYAL OF BARS METROPOLIS
Com s s 1 oRN °B
RA:).
SALE OF THEBYTs
o'clock, the Commissioners
blilopnuersoc tinfmteheeMgeatrot
tzliirs
oTumernesp,ikNeo-.ro2a2d, snorth
of the Thames held
White-
hall-place; Earl Lowther, Chief Commissioner, presiding; for the
purpose of letting by auction, to the best bidder, the first and second
stricts, comprising the Brentford, Isleworth, and Kensington-
roads.d which were put up at 16,160/., and fetched 16,1701. The
third and fourth districts included the Tyburn and Uxbridge-roads,
for which the Commissioners bid 8,4001., the sum of 8,1207. haying
been in the circular. This was disposed of for 8,5101. For the sixth,
seventh, and eighth districts there were no bidders. The former
contained the Harrow-road, in which three gates were removed, for
which the Commissioners asked 1,120/. ; and the latter contained the
Kilburn and Edgeware-roads, put up at 4,1261. The ninth district
being the Highgate and Hampstead-roads, went for 17,5301., the
Commissioners' price being 17,5201. ; and the City-road (the tenth
district) was bought for 3,0501., the put-up price being 3,0401. The
eleventh, twelfth, thirteenth, and fourteenth districts ; and the
fifteenth and sixteenth districts, were bought n. The er in-
cluded the Stamford Hill-road, the Green Lanes' i
road, and thforemSeven
Sisters'-road. On these six bars were removed—among them being
the Manor-house bar, which was the most valuable. The sum asked
for this lot was 11,060/. The latter district included the Hackney
and Lea-bridge roads, from which four bars were removed, including
the Shoreditch bar in the Hackney-road.
THEATRICALS IN ALl:amts.—Algiers is henceforth to
have two theatres. In one will be played opera, comic opera, ballet,
and Italian opera; the other will be restricted to comedy, drama,
and vaudville. These two theatres will receive an annual allowance
from Government. Moreover the formation of two dramatic com-
panies is to be authorised, who will visit the principal towns of
the
French Algerian provinces.
all in fail employment in this city. The
that the weavers are nearly a
-
EMPLOYMENT IN NORWICH.—We are happy to state
molt
We.
numberdoitpaipullanear.te,f;wr ouoitidcoloirrourenef nap, in consequence,

MARKET NEWS.-(YESTERDAY.)

CORN EXCEANGE.
The supply of English Wheat on offer being on the increase the
demand for it war extremely dull, and prices were with difficulty
supported. At the close of the market a clearance was not effected.
In free Foreign Wheat so little was doing that the quotations were
almost nominal. Grain under lock was a mere drug. The finest
malting Barley moved off at late rates, but grinding and distilling
sorts might have been purchased on somewhat easier terms. The
Malt trade was in a very inactive state, yet we can notice no altera-
tion in value. We hare to notice a te,,dy, though not to say brisk,
Inquiry for Oats, at very full prices. Beans and Peas were quite as
dear, but Flour hung heavily on hand.

ARRIVALS.
Wheat. I Barley. Oats Flour.
English .... • • 8,060 qrs 1,340 qrs. 8,320 qrs. 2,890 ski.
Irish . .
--- 10,710
Foreign .....• 7,110
790

CROMWELL'S DESCENT.
The following extract from Sir Samuel Mevrick's v-
first lecture on the History of England, delivered lately at
the Hereford Mechanics' Institution, traces the genealogy of
that remarkable man (Cromwell) in a light which we are
sure is perfectly new to many of our readers :
Oliver Cromwell was descended from a very ancient and
highly allied family, of Welsh origin. sprung from Cadwgan,
second son of Bleddyn ab Cynvyn, Prince of Powis, the founder
of one of the Royal tribes of Wale:,, His great great grand-
father was William ab levan, who held an honourable office in
the household of Jasper Tudyr, Earl of Bedford ; one of whose
sons, Morgan ab William, was also called Morgan Williams,
and he lived at a house named Cwm Castell, in the parish of
Newchurch, Carmarthenshire. This 'Williams married a
sister of Thomas Lord Cromwell, created Earl of Essex in
1540 ; and his eldest son, out of respect to his uncle's me-
mory, obtained the royal licence to assume the name of Crom-
well. Sir Henry Cromwell, the son and heir, resided in Cam-
bridgeshire, and was the father of Sir Oliver Cromwell,
created Knight of the Bath in 1603, who died without issue;
and of Robert Cromwell, Esq., who settled in the town
of Huntingdon, and relievd the scantiness of his
patrimony by engaging in the business of a brewer.
Robert Cromwell married the widow of William Lynne, of
Bsssingbourne, Cambridgeshire, daughter of Sir Robert
Stewart, a Knight of the city of Ely ; and they became, on
the 25th of April, 1599, the parents of Oliver, so named after
his uncle. Through his maternal ancestry, he sprang from
the same stock as King Charles I.; but as this fact is very
curious, I shall give it in detail : _
Alexander Stuatt ditad in 128 G.

I. John Stuart, died in 1298. 1. Andrew Stuart.
2. Walter Stuart died in 1320. 2. Alexander Stuart.
3. Robert IL, King of Scotland, died 1390. 3. John Stuart.
4. Robert 111., died in 1406. 4. John Stuart.
5. James I. died in 1437. 5. Thomas Stuart.
6. James 11. died in 1460. 6. Richard Stuart.
7. James 111. died 1488. 7. Nicholas Stuart.
_ _ _

8. James IV. died in 1513.

8. Nicholas Steward,

9. James V. died in 1542. 9. William Steward, Ely.
10. Mary Queen of Scots died in 1567. 10. Elizabeth, married to
Robert Cromwell.
11. James VI. of Scotland died in 1626. 11. Oliver Cromwell, Lord
Protector.
12. Charles 1., King of England, died 1646.

Oliver received his education in the Free School of Hunting-
don, whence he was removed to Sidney College. Cak.bridge ;
and is said to have studied law at Lincoln's Inn ; tradition
adding, that his chambers were immediately over the
gateway. He is reported to have led a dissolute life in Lon-
don, but to have been reclaimed by marriage, which took
place before he was full age, when he returned to his
native town, from which he was removed to Ely, to take
possession of an estate bequeathed to him by his ma-
ternal uncle. He was drawn from retirement by his first
cousin, the well-known John Hampden, who well knew his
talents, and which he had exhibited in the Short Parliament
of 1628 ; he was therefore returned a Member to the Long
Parliament at the general election. It is a curious fact, that
this principal regicide had at oae time iutended to go with
his cousin and some of the more sealous puritanical party, to
New England, and had actually embarked in the river
Thames for the purpose, when they were all stopped and
compelled to return ashore by an order in Council.—The
Cambrian.

A SEIRII SAMARITAN.—Among the officers of her
Majesty's 9th Foot severely wounded at Ferozeshah, and
who subsequently died, was a Mr. S--. There is a story
connected with his wound, poor fellow, which, if true,
as I believe it to be, is quite romantic. He was wounded
in the leg on the evening of the 21st, and while lying
on the ground alone his regiment having gone on to
the attack, a Seikh came up to him and said, " Sahib,
my people are killing all the wounded, and if you remain
here you will be killed too; but come with me and I will
save you." S— replied, " How can I come with you?
my leg is broken, and I cannot even stand." " Oh!"
said the man, " I will take you on my back," which was
accordingly done; and off he set with him in the direc-
tion of Ferozepore. After going for a considerable dis-
tance, when they were quite out of reach of the enemy,
he stopped to rest and wait for daylight, paying every
attention that circumstances would admit of to his charge's
comfort. As the day broke, a party of our cavalry came up,
on their way from Ferozepore to the field, and the officer with
them stopped to see if he could do anything for S—, and after
giving him some brandy and water, asked him what he in-
tended doing; to which he replied, "I shall mount my good
Samaritan again, and go into Ferozepore." The Seikh once more
took him on his back, and carried him till they fell in with a litter
for the sick, into which he got, and was taken to the Fe-
rozepore hospital. His friend, however, would not even
then leave him, but walked by the litter all the way, and,
after they had reached the hospital, remained by his bed-
side in close attendance upon him until the day of his
death. It is also said that the story reached the ears of
the Governor-General, who after poor S--'s death made
the man a liberal present, and took him into the public
service.
THE LATE SEIZURE AT STOCKPORT.—We stated
last Wednesday, that bankrupt's effects, to the amount of
between 3001. and 4001., attempted to be concealed from the
creditors, had been seized at Hazle Grove. Since then the
matter has been made public, by the issue of placards offer-
ing a
_reward of 20 per cent. upon the value of all goods
which could afterwards be discovered and handed over. for
the benefit of the creditors. The bankrupt is Henry Mars-
land, late silk throwster and shopkeeper, Hazle Grave.
About 300 sovereigns, made up in a box, were found con-
cealed in one house, and other property, to the value of
nearly 1001. more. On Saturday last, the police seized a
further lot of silk in the hank, valued at about 25/.—Man-
chaster Guardian.

ADVERTISEMENT.]—The Gentleman's Real Head
of air, or Invisible Ventilating Peruke, is se close a resem-
blance to nature as to, defy detection ; and to enable any gen-
tleman to see the effect, a large assortment is always kept for
inspection, any one of which, if approved of, saves the purchaser
both time and trouble. These splendid specimens of the per-
rugnean art, superior to anything to be obtained elsewhere,
either in Paris or London, have only to be seen to be admired,
and are the sole invention of Ross and Sons, 119 and 120,
Bishopsgate-street, London. N.B. Splendid hair-cutting
apartments on the ground-floor, the whole of the walls being
lined with looking-glass ala mods de Paris.
[ADVERTISEMENT.] DEBILITY AND CONFIRMED
ASTHMA.—EXTRAOUDINARY CURE BY HOLLOWAY'S PlLLS.—EitraCt
of a letter from J. Thompson, Esq., proprietor of the " Armagh
Guardian," April 17, 1846.—" To Professor Holloway. Sir—A ser-
geant living in this city lately returned from the East Indies, caught
a severe cold by the change from a tropical to a moist climate, he
became very ill, weak, and asthmatical. I am happy to say, that
he is not only quite cured of the asthma, but is also now so strong
and vigorous that he can run round the Malt with any person in the
city. This cure has been effected entirely by using your medicines.
(Signed) "J. THOMPSON." Sold by all druggists, and at Professor
Holloway's Establishment, 244, Strand, London.
NOVEL FRAUDS.—A young man, bearing the aristo-
cratic name of De Belfort, was tried on Thursday, by the Tribunal
of Correctional Police of Paris, for swindling, under the following
circumstances:—He had put forth a prospectus of a pretended joint-
stock company, for the insurance of the owners of houses against
loss by bad tenants, and advertised for clerks and agents, from whom
he demanded deposits of money, as the guarantee of their good con-
' duct. In this way he had received three or four thousand francs;
but when his dupes found that no salary was forthcoming, and that
his company was a mere bubble, they laid a complaint before the
Procureur do Roi, and the ingenious M. de Belfort was removed from
his office to a less agreeable lodging, where, however, he had abun-
dant leisure to concoct new schemes. He was found guilty, and sen-
tenced to six months' imprisonment. In the course of the evidence
against him, the following curious fact was stated. Be had been
some time ago arrested at the suit of several creditors, and confined
at the debtors prison of the Rue de Clichy. To release himself, he
had recourse to the following expedient :—llehad a billet de fair, vat
printed, and sent to each of his creditors. It announced the death of
M. Louis de Belfort, in the Rue de Clichy, and contained the usual
invitation to the funeral. Not one of the creditors had sufficient
respect for " the deceased" M. de Belfort to follow his remains to the
ground, and, as no inquiry was made, no doubt was entertained of
his death. Consequently, on the first of the following month, the
greffier of the prison went to him, and informed him that he was
free, as no creditor had called to pay the month's allowance, without
payment of which a debtor cannot be detained. M. de Belfort walked
oat with a tight heart, and wobably a light peeket, which he soon
contrived to fill with the deposits et his employits.
THE 10TH HUSSARS.—Tne staff and remaining por-
tion of this fine regiment in England left Canterbury Barracks yes-
terday morning and proceeded to Herne Bay. They then embarked
on board a steam-boat for Gravesend, where they were transhipped
tohisn boardmorn the Larkins
for
rrkins
Bombay.and PTershoiastlanif sdiarme
on The troops appeared to be in excellent condition.
ASHTON-UNDER-LYNE, MAY 4. SUICIDE. --
bOthariedhthveafsos
On
remise will trl .1
cid and Manchester Railway. On the forenoon of the
the S h eat fyi
d a man named Richard Crooks, 57 years of age, a widower
Monday last a most determined act. of self-destruction took place on
sloin,ewhoof rhasiplwpsayedattoFlbooweragy-sthlgid,,nghatohnOwed
abovewith six children, residing in Castle-street, Newton, left his fatally.
after eating a hearty breakfast. The deceased had been absent about
two hours, when he was carried home a mangled corpse. He was
seen between ten and eleven o'clock by several persons standing n
while
ibigedgthe
ercerohs
long it would be before the next train came up. renti
bridge until the arrival of the eleven o'clock train f n9d o
einasgkethdeaabwoovme
rom Manchester,
and when it came in sight he was noticed by two l
were working a short distance off, to Walk deliberatelyl2, ate-layers, who
down the
embankment at the end of the bridge and lay himself down across
the rails along which the train wott'd pass.
the deceased lying on the rails, w The engineer observed
the train; the result was that he as unable at the time to stop
Was literally cut to pieces. The
train was stopped immediately, and a
the spot found him dead. The body number of passengers going to
it now lies awaiting the The
Was carried to his house, where
coroners inquest.

On the 3d inst., at Knapton
BIRTHS
daughter. House,
On the 23d ult., itt Naples, the wife of Henry Rucks Gibbs, Esq.,
of a son. Norfolk, Lady Robinson, of a
On the 30th alt., at the Royal Military College, Sandhurst, the wife
ofOn Captain W.. Walker, 69th Regiment, of a son.
the 2d a son. inst., Mrs. Edward Brewster, of Burton-crescent, of
lad On the 3d inst., at Higher Ardwick Lodge, near Manchester, the
y of Captain Cleather, of twin sons, one of whom was still-born.
On the 4th inst., at Abney-place, Stoke Newington, Mrs. J. W.
Scott, of a daughter.
On the 4th inst., at Peckham, Mrs. John Monett, of a son.
On the 4th inst., Mrs. John Oliver Smith, of Richmond-place,
Brighton, of a son.
On the 4th inst., the lady of A. Griffin, Esq., of a daughter.

M`Kerrell, .
On the 18th of December MARRIED
1 845, at Port Louis, Mauritius, Robert
En, to Emily Pauline, fourth daughter of Colonel
Slimily, e.g.

DI.
On the 4th inst., at Clapham, Jane, widow of the late Themas
Burkitt, Esq.
On the 4th inst., at Brighton, Mary, the wife of Sir Martin Archer
Shee, President of the Royal Academy.
On the 4th inst., at Devonport, Charlotte, daughter of Lieutenant-
Colonel Warren, C. 8., 55th Regiment.
On the 4th inst., in Charlotte-street, Portland-place, Frances,
of the late James Lamb, Esq. relict
On the 29th ult., at Great Missenden, Bucks, Thomas Squires
Perry, Esq., aged 47.
On the 30th ult., at Brent Lodge, Hanwell, Mary, elder sister of
the Rev. Dr. Emerton, curate of that place.
On the Ist inst., at Richmond, Surrey, Sarah, relict of the late A.
Blizard, Esq., aged 82.
On the Ist inst., Miss Hackett, of Brompton-row.

On the Ist inst., in Upper Gower-street, Sarah, relict of the late,
Launcelot flare, M.D.

On the 28th ult., at Crosby-square, Ann, second daughter of the
late J. G. Saggers, of Crosby-squr..re.

On the 23tii alt., Thomas killer, son of the late Thomas 31E1er,
Esq., of Peckham-rye, Surrey.

London : Printed and Published by hfURDO YOUNG, of No. 112,
Strand, Printer, at The Sun Office, N 0.112, Strand, in the Precinct
or the Savoy, in the County of Middlesex, Thursday, Ml4'
f,

5!)0
Malt, 3,130 qrs.
WHITECII,III'.III.
Although the supplies of each kind of Meat w,re not to say ex-
tensive, the demand was throughout heavy, at barely statiumar y
prices. Beet from 2s 6d to 3s Cd ; Mutton, 3s 4d to 4s 4d; Lam 1,
5s 4d to Gs 4d ; Veal, 3s 4d to 4s 4d and Pork, 3s 8d to 5s par 81135.