The Sun.
London, England, 1846-02-28 00:00:00

(Cheers.) The Hon. Member has made a very extraordinary
statement with respect to Mr. Wilson—a statement which he
lias been afraid to make in a court of justice.
Mr. !, ER RAND—No, no.

passed last night and the present fully showed it. This sort of
melo dramatic malignity—this sort of Sadler's Wells sarcas.'
which was so easily put ao—this waving of the hand sad
tree with the finger—this looking darsgers but using nontet e
r
w. s, to say the least of it, exceedingly improper.--4augebe
and cheers.) He should say the pruner remedy for su
matter as that now complained of—the best course for H°D
Members to pursue on any question was—not to say atifilling
be
that waa contrary to gentlemanly courtesy, or that could
fairly looked up (on as offensive— Cheers).
Mr. O'CONNELL would not have said one word had, re
memory of the Hon. Gentleman not been inaccurate, 204,
public might possibly supply with imagination the deficiescfie
of his memory. He hud not been accused of calumny. "
said that the system of election committees was one ot corrorf
Lion and perj He had been censured in consequence°
these observations, and the Speaker read him a lecture emir
subject. As soon as the Speaker had concluded, he ( rof
O'C'onnell) repeated the very words which he had made us!be
---(Great laughter)—and the House had since confirm
truth of his remarks, for they abolished that CoMmitteestin
gcther. lie was very much obliged to the Hon. Gentleaw
for again giving him an opportunity of reiterating those eimer.
vations. •
:Major 13ERESFO RD denied that he was guilty
tion. It was the general haling of the Committee that h
unjustly, unfairly, and acrimoniously attacked. fief! in
Mr. B. ESCOTT said that he wasperfectly justi ,
goo
the obseivations he had made in the Pabsence of the
Member for Koareshorough. the
Lord JOHN MANNERS said that, so far as he knewtorta
observations which had been made respecting Mr.
Asvhtgo the
were by no means correct. He could bear testimota •
ed
admirable manner in which that gentleman had dischatg a As
obligations which his position imposed upon him. N"blttf
more fully impressed than he was with the great respensinfos
which attached to him as one ot the greatest cotton msn,..tare
of coerr7o
turers in the empire, and no one was more fully aline t°
fulfilment of the duties of his situation. alletl
Mr. FIELDEN (who was totally inaudible in the
for some time said (as we understood), that the manufseiwata
had applied to the Poor-law Commissioners to send dem" d`
the manufacturing, from the agricultural districts, a neeed
labourers for the purpose of equalising the price of 10'1 gat
that they (the Poor-law Commissioners) had done se, °pato
down 10,000 to the manufacturing districts. If they '°°t°
the Commission of Inquiry into these districts, thek,srer
find that the statement made by the Hon. Member for
borough had not been incorrect. ion
Sir ROBERT PEEL said he would net have r- 010
take part in this discussion had it not been for what ImciGeptie
from the Hon. Member for Shrewsbury. That lion. a tell
man recalled to the recollection of the House what had of a
place, he believed, about three years since, in the celeel)
debate that took place at that time, when he (Sir ft;b,slis
put an erroneous construction upon an expression use", fleet,
Hon. Gentleman opposite, the Member for Stockpett•Thare
hear.) That Hon. Gentleman having explained hi" eiittb"
sions, it was his (Sir R. Peel's) intention at that time t odd
explanation which he made to the Hon. Member in reply „ aiela
relieve him from the imputation which he then put 00)-,,esP
—( Hear, hear.) If any one was present at that time 115_00,
recollect that he made a complete disavowal of his 011"otidS
and he would also recollect that he said that if that esPaselieo
was not considered to be sufficient, he would take the ',roe
opportunity of giving an ample apolegy.—( Hear, hear.) i ifse
lot
were his (Sir R. Peel's) intentions, and he thought
fereace to the record of the day would show that simmlost
ilat
have been his intentions, and he thought that the oeol°
Member for Shrewsbury, after the lapse of three Ye'ltietil
not have revived that subject. His (Sir R. Peers) L(l4
was entirely to withdraw the expressions-which he "-
under an erroneous view.
Mr. R. COBDEN—I feel happy, Sir, at having 'llm° M'
„„a trk,
tunity of remarking upon what has fallen from theaoiebiell
Baronet. lam sorry to say, that at the time to %tat?,
alluded I thought, and I believe the country also theogi atal".
the Right Hon. Gentleman did not make that disavow,' otjs;
WAS due to me. Still, Sir, the matter is altogether 'Yoe'
ordinary, and as the words which were uttered by me,s "pforrattl
in the opinion of the greater part of te Hon. at
that side of the House to bear the ihnterpretation P
them by the Right Hon. Baronet, I think I mai betels thia
for occupying the attention of the House. I win". hilt 01
present disavowal as an ample disavowal by the nig, aldi,j
Gentleman, and as entirely satisfactory.—(Cheers/ saute
am very glad that he has made that complete disavowiloiatio
think it will be as pleasant to his feelings as it is t? at Wk.
have had this opportunity of expressing my regret, tD
the remembrance of what has passed in this House iffaae
ling in my own mind, I have alluded in publia to loagnaaa.,
lion. Gentleman in terms which I regret after thi'tc7e 170
tion.—( Cheers.) I sincerely hope elm' both wha otedi
said and what I have said may be eosrpletely oblite
that no one may be justified in hereafter alluding t°l:, 01°140
Mr. BUTT said that, on Tuesday next, he ,
coming under the consideration of the House, and isb:ptea,
will to retard in the smallest degree the progress of to to be'
most important and protracted debate, he wished 61;
formed by the Right Hen. Baronet at the head of 01 bee
merit whether it was his wish that the motion shoo,'
poned? Pr'.4
e
Sir R. PEEL was understood to ask the Hon,' ihel'at
postpone his motion for the present. If the lion'ifereai
would do so it would be a convenience to the G°.
and expedite the dispatch of public business. t f the Pedlf
Mr. HUTT would readily consent to the requo- °folleft.-
lion. Baronet, and trusted his example would be
other Hon. Gentlemen who had motions on the Parr; taela
Mr. STAFFORD O'BRIEN said that, as it l'arbaiids
and understanding on both sides of the House thati,i,?lo
should close that evening, he wished to ask the
Baronet the First Lord of the Treasury how he ilif;
arrange the public business for next week ? The 'flate.-0
Baronet had a motion on the paper for Monday re, oceaff
Indian army, and he presumed that subject wool
otioido
House the whole of Monday night. one of
Sir ROBERT PEEL (who spoke in so low a t-jesd
as to be perfect y inaudible in the gallery), maig,toitiefea,is
impress upon the House that he could not have tit liTair
than take the earliest opportunity of asking
award its thanks to the commanders and men °' ;pet soil'
Indian army, who had lately so distinguished thera''',o6ol
fending the rights of this country. He did not, hiitas
ciliate that this subject would occupy the
~11°1
House very long, and so soon as it was disposed an "-or
proceed to move his resolutions in Committee, •-a 01
following day he should propose to bring form'roatelosi
branch of his measure. He was sure the House vi(lepecu,'ir
necessity of their getting through the measure 51,„evsl,
possible, as delays only proved detrimental to near') AO'
terest in the country. , ;„a
It was then agreed that the House at its rising
journ till Monda. L. roi
PU/SLIyC WORKS (IRELAND) - '0
On the motion of Sir J. GRAHAM, this Bill
third time and passed. riffled'
A Ore' aeSat
Sir R. PEEL, in pursuance of a notice he ho"aa. be raar
moved that all petitions relating to the timber duti:6oo'
After a few words from Mr. LIDDELL, the my
and carried.

Mr. BRIGHT—Does V,e Hen. Member recollect that he
once charged Mr. Wilson and Mr. Rawson, at a meeting held
at Liverpool, which he himself addressed, as being present at. a
meeting at which a proposition was made for committing the
frightful crime of assassination? Does he recolect that Mr.
Rawson wrote to the solicitors of the Hon. Member to ascer-
tain if he (Mr. Ferranti) was prepared to stand by the state-
ments he had made. The Hon. Member stated that he was
prepared to stand by them, as reported in the Morning Past
newspaper. Mr. Rawson's solicitor, Mr. Tolson, of Bradford,
wrote to the Hon. Member's solicitor, stating that it was Mr.
Rawson's intention to bring an action for defamation, and asking
whether the Hon. Member would give, in addition that the
statement of the Morning Post was the one which he was pre-
pared to stand by, in order to obviate the inconvenience of pro-
secuting the newspaper, and the Hon. Member intimated that
he would egree to give a guarantee to the proprietor of the
Morning Post to save him harmless from the effect of an
action. When Mr. Wilson and Mr. Rawson wrote to the
Morning Post, the proprietors of that newspaper stated
that they ought not to be prweeuted because they had merely
reported in their columns the speech of the. Hon. Member for
Knaresborough (Mr. Ferrand), and that he had not given
them the guarantee that he had stated.—( Cheers.) Every
particle of that statement was as untrue as anything ever ut-
tered by any Hon. Member, or by any one on the face of the
earth. It would have been proved untrue in a court of jus-
tice, but the Hon. Member durst not go into it. With respect
to the charges which the Hon. Member has brought against

me --
Mr. FERRAND interrupted the Hon. Member by inquir-
ing why Mr. Wilson and Mr. Rawson did not proceed with
their action?
Mr. BRIGHT—I will state why the prosecution was not.
followed. The Anti-Corn-law League appealed to the public
through the means of general discussion.—(Cheers, and cries
of " Oh, oh.") They would scorn, every man of them, to
go into a court of justice against an editor who, in the
fulfilment of a great and meritorious duty to the public in
general, publishes in his columns good and, I must say, bad
speeches also—(Hear, hear)—for he had inserted the
speech of the Honouratee Member in which these
unfounded statements were made. The Hon. Member
had referred to the condition of the people of the towns of
Rochdale and Bolton, and had intimated his opinion that they
were in a sad and miserable condition. Now, he did not want
any certificate from the Hon. Member for the feeling of the
people of those towns, for the people of Rochdale were well
acquainted with any small merits which he might possess ;
they knew him intimately, arid with regard to the Hon. Mem-
ber for Knaresborough, he would venture to assert that Roch-
dale was the last place in the county where the Hon. Gentle-
man would be received with cordiality. The Hon. Gentleman
must have some recollection of the reception which he met
with the last time he made his appearance there, and lie thought
that the present statement was quite as unfounded as those
which had appeared in the newspaper to which he had refer-
red; and he would go further, and assert, if he might be
allowed to use language which was found upon the journals of
the House, and would say that the statement of the Hon.
Member was calumnious, and absurd, and unfounded altogether.
—( Loud cheers from the League benches.)
Dr. BOWRING thought that he was called upon to say a
few worth respecting the statement made the other night by
the Hon. Member for Knaresborough, and they should be a
very few words. The Hon. Gentleman complained that he
had not risen to answer him the moment he had sat down ; the
fact was that he was unable to reply at that time, for he was
not present at the termination of the lion. Member's speech.
The lion. Member had, in the course of his observations,
used expressions which intimated that the labouring portion
of the community of Bolton and its immediate neighbourhood
were badly clad, badly fed, and badly housed, aid were con-
tent with any accommodation. In connexion with these
assertions he had used the name of Mr. Henry Ashworth,
and had stated that that gentleman had been the instrument
of introductng a large portion of the inhabitants from the
agricultural population ; he had further, in connexion with
this transaction, employed a term in the highest degree
offensive—he had called this a cold-blooded act. Now he
wished to disconnect the name of Mr. Ashworth from any
such term ; and he would take the liberty of referring to the
Noble Lord the Member for Newark (Lord John Manners), who
was intimately acquainted with the condition of the whole
population of the town, and was perfectly compe-
tent to form a correct judgment upon it. He
knew the condition of the people who were all dependent
upon him. And he was quite willing to leave the whale
case in the hands of the Noble Lord, and to let the truth of
his statement be tested with teat of the Hon. Member.
Mr. ROEBUCK, who Vas extremely inaudible in the
commencement of his remark;eend was understood to observe,
that he considered he was justified by all the rules of that
House in presuming that an lion. Member, who had Well •
pied the last two hours and a half of the debate, in a very
fierce attack on Hen. Members at that side of the House, and
on persons out of it, would in mere fairness have been in his
place to hear the answer to be made to his vituperation.—
( Hear, hear.) He would not say one word of the attack
the Hon. Gentleman had made upon him for his failure in
life. But he would say in all his misfortunes, it had never
been his fate to have a body of gentlemen assembled in
England to declare that which he had stated to have been a false-
hood and a calumny. There was a resolution now remaining
on the books of the House which would descend to posterity—
that a Member of that House had been guilty
of an infamous calumny on two other Members.
—( Hear, hear.) The Hon. Member said that he founded his
belief on a resolution passed by certain persons in the town of
Rochdale. But he (Mr. Roebuck) believed the resolution of
the House of Commons, which was just to the same effect.—
(Cheers.) The Hon. Member never denied—he had never
answered it ; and as long as it remained on the books of that
House the Hon. Gentleman was welcome to make whatever
statement he wished. He (Mr. Roebuck) was perfectly
satisfied so that such statement was afterwards weighed in the
balance of the good sense of the House. That was his (Mr.
Roebuck's) answer.—( Hear, hear.) One word as• regarded
what had been said by tho Hon. Baronet (Sir R. Inglis) op-
posite. lie stated that he heard him (Mr. Roebuck) employ
personalities in that House. Why, if he did use them, or if he
made charges against Hon. Gentlemen, he succeeded in
proving them—( Hear, hear)—and if such could be termed a
personality, why so could an indictment.—( Hear, hear.) ts e
charged Hon. Members with corrupt practices, and hg proved
his charge.—(" No, no," from a Gentleman opposite. 1 He
appealed to the resolution of the Committee, who, without a
division, fully convicted Hon. Gentlemen, and, amongst the
rest, the Hon. Member who cried " No."—( Hear.)
Mr. DISRAELI should say he was one of those who very
much regretted that his Hon. Friend the Member for Knares-
borough should think it his duty to make an attack on mem-
bers of the agricultural bedy ; and he should say
that he (Mr. Disraeli) differed with the Honour-
able Gentleman in his views on that subject.—( Hear.)
He had often remonstrated with him on the subject ' • but he
should say this, that his Hon. Friend the Member for Knares-
borough was prepared to say the same outside the walls of that THE ADJOURNED DEBATE.
esecens te'
House that he said within them.—(Hear, hear.) Such was On the order of the day for going into
his Hon. Friend's conviction, and he believed that he was Customs' and Corn Importation Acts being reasoarelifici.,4ol'
merely fulfilling his duty in acting as he did.—( Dear, hear.) Mr. G. BANKES rose and said, that he inaraiellooPee
Now, that being the case, he (Mr. Disraeli) could not see, gretted the delay that had, taken place in reseeslift eerol
from the way in' which the Hon. Member for Knaresborough journed debate, because he concurred in the genoe to!'0000.
acted, how he had done anything to call for the marked ea- had teen expressed that this debate should c°e_ he "-,tsei
pression of disapprobation at the hands of that House.—.( Hear, sion that evening, and, as far as he was concerne'io'ikerion,.!o,
hear.) Now, with regard to the name of another gentleman, occasion much delay. He would endeavour teereseldetet
Mr. George Wilson, chairman of the Ant i-Corn-law League, tance the speech of the Hon. Member for W°lfl test . of,
he (Mr. Disraeli) had a few words to say. He believed Mr. he would not imitate him in point o tier
JlOOO,
Wilson to be a very good sort of person—(Hear)—and, no which occupied se large a portion of t 800.'00 el
doubt, when better known was better liked.—( Hear, and a House last night. He did not regret that ollestiogoeu,
laugh). He believed that for a series of years, he was an measure had been forwarded previously to le, proc,teeet9
agitator, and had expressed his opinions on public men and bate, he meant the measure which made tbsbetowiee
measures with little reserve ; and he was surprised that that Ireland, to meet an emergency that had arisen:, 000 00 Eel
gentleman, or his representative , should think fit to show their It was to such measures that they might look two 0 veto
thin skin on the present occasion.—( Hear, hear, and a the emergency. He was glad to find that it agielio'relaes
laugh). Now, as to the resolutions of committees, and stood that they were not discussing an Irish ‘l,-reed q.sitire
such stories, he (Mr. D'lsraeli) did not want to listen to them, great measure, which has been so strangelY,',"eat th's JO
because he was as prejudiced on one side as his Hon. Friend attention of the House. He now understooe t"of fooesettros
was on the other.—( Hear, hear.) As regarded Mr. Ash- was not mixed up with the supposed deficienclteef
worth, he should say that he knew sufficient of his family to land, and he was happy to perceive that if tit 0, to
bear testimony that it was one which was not alone a credit but calmly and fully consider the question ; and
an honour to the country.—( Loud cries of " Hear, hear," from should receive the sanction of this House, it -.sarill,eersir
both sides of the House. ) Was it desirable that everybody any cf those disadvantages which would neee:t $ 0.-tbeb,
in that House should be of the` opinion, or that Hon. Members the passing a permanent measure to °le" 1t3'2"01 tst
having different prejudices should not express them. He emergency. He recollected that in the year h lid tAv to
really however thought that his Hon. Friend the Member for tress was then greater than anything colleelosOltor
Knaresborough had the best of tee argument.—(Cheers.) stated to exist at this period; and when he re,ever
He (Mr. Disraeli) deprecated attacks on absent individuals, that time there was the greatest glut of etiriee tha'oretoote
who were, perhaps, as worthy men as any in the country.— this country, how could it possibly be 0117; theerfelit /013,
(Cheers from the Liberals)—but still he thought that his Hon. duction of corn could by any means rat"' 'tee Preetrvsta
Friend had substantiated his position in the view he had tress in Ireland? lie did not wish to detain town'
taken.—( Cheers.) The Hon. Member for Durham, for the Baronet, who he saw was about to leave the 00 be lingbiesiel
city of Durham, had made a confused statement with respect therefore, postpone the further obeservatiotoaddrestione os]
to an accusation which had been urged against his Hon. Friend upon the state of Ireland for the purpose °Lad eatit.sote jeolif
because he had accused certe:r. Members of the Anti-Corn law mar ks to that part of the transaction which I"teers, !ini
the
League of being assassins. He would not take it on himself te upon his own mind, and upon the minds of frets pet
decide whether the Members of the Anti-Corn-law League out of this House, and which materiallY ado cen , 11,0 1/I',
should have prosecuted his Hon- Friend or the news' apers, crisis into which we have been brought by une'te 'root:
but this he did know, that he had heard the members Right Hon. Baronet, and which had been 'titetietcl;o.l3l4 tbo
of the Anti-Corn-law League accused of being cedented, and, he had almost said, ueeen n sieht '-feeliee4;
assassins by a most distinguished individual in that House— opinion it appeared rather strange that the for he
eor,
(Tremendous sheering)—wwere
ho they very ready to support should have adopted such a course as tki° 'et bed
fop f 1
oft!'
on that occasion.—( Continued cheering.) Why not pro,ecute • upon this occasion the Right Hon. Bartnithis co° eritY
the Right Hon. Baronet?—( Laughter and reiterated cheerine.) power and privilege, as Prime Minister of a nlaitight itioo!
Why not at once strike at the monarch of the wood, instead of it was most untt,ual to do, in order to Aster relie tiftrteef•
preying upon the smaller deer ?—( Cheers.) if they wished Cabinet to vote with him on this measure.the arlt°,ol,
rioe.A
to vindicate their charecters from the stigma of being assassins, Barmiet Was not then a member of mi„istera'• $ replv.•
they could always have ample opportunity, by referring to the for he had 1 czignctl hi., place as Pritu.e atul dea
pages of Hansard; and as he had no doubt that the Right Hon. fore, he acted only as a private individuaten he ha *_), OP,
Gentleman would give a guarantee to his solicitor to defend the individual, and not as a Minister of the Crofo'ralatiosaf sec
action, they might prosecute him immediately.—( Shouts of his influence with her Majesty in the
not 0060 a°,
te I'
the
°P
laughter.) He thought that too much had ueen made by the Cabinet. Now he (Mr. Bankes) was ntbe Cr°oot "
Hon. and Learned Member for Bath of a resolution come to by example being set by any Minister °f he he dateesa duo we°,
the House some two years ago, with regard to his Hon Friend. former occasion ; and, therefore, though first de
—(Hear, hear.) He (Arr. Disraeli) had thought that the such was an unconstitutional course, it made 1' be Ot s
es
roost ridiculous resolution the House had ever arrived at.— dent, When the Right Hon. Barons' objeceTt• tll'esdit)
( Hear, hear.) He believed that the Right Hon. Baronet was in this House this session tieelt tlii!oty. et
edtar ise'to
Very averse to bringing it before the House. The Right Hon. allusion to this interview with ber a.) pportun P"ort
Gentleman had himself a natural sense for humour, and he sion the Noble Lord must have had ethf .sovereti oaf %re
did all he could to prevent these proceedingar, hear.) the letter placed in his hands bY ",.:et th`oltri;
He stated that he lead no desire to go on, but the whole had that the Right Heil. Baronet had 1",._ carry he veep
originated in the quarter of the House in which everything whatever Ministry should take officne_e /ono et:tich lis'gre;
disagreeable always originated, namely, with the Hon. and changes which he had contetnplated le, trroasedeeeese,o, •
Learned Member for Bath.—( Cheers and laughter.) And Now, when the Right Hon. Baron: Yeerinde oe '0
bane ~ Hoe. „e ore
when the Honourable and Learned Member described, it must be looked upon as a great t. a vipija •JO r,oi
with that dramatic effect which was so worthy of sacrifice of public principle. Had libeWeenaueoe of:; °oe
a minor theatre— ( Roars of laughter )—the horrible allowed the sense of the country to e
were i„ f /03°easu(e. °s)
consequences of that resolution (Loud laughter) question, then, indeed, if the people
ose the theTeeell°lp
and declared that his Hon. Friend had uttered a calumnious posed change, no one could opr afford! fiesrs ,t
statement, he ought to have looked to the Hon. and Learned this opportunity had not _eerie, off 'to
Member for Cork (Mr. O'Connell) who had been placed in a they had a right to complaio•—tkhe part 044 a yer:t plop
somewhat similar predicament. He (Mr. Disraeli) was in Indeed the change of principles oncount rY 'l'lOOlEOl -tbs jfe
the House at the time, and he understood that some statements Baronet was looked upon by the
a,
_ouid
ore int° hoot
of the Hon. and Learned Member were supposed to calum- eye ; it was not inch a conditioonni
ce`o:wniedennofit'ofts,:elataborieedios,
of ate certain Members of the House, and he (Mr. Disraeli) other light. When the coalitcia, b
tb4:Pc°oii:roscePstiorrelwarbgiche -ttrerl
believed that he was reproved by the predecessor of the Right Fox, and Mr. Burke, took Oa
Hon. Gentleman, who tilled the Speaker's chair. He would been for the purpose of seeking
not make a point of that resolution ; he would leave his Hon. were above such a suspicion. en
represents" ieelgesoicheetS
Friend and the Hon. and Learned Member for Bath to deal Alinisters entitled them, as h
with it as they liked.—( Laughter. ) But if his Hon. Friend stituencies, to call on them not
to the constiturieod t°,o it;
would only follow his (Mr. Disraeli's) example, never to abuse had given to the people,
hoe
were determinnea on toe 00) I ill
any one—( Roars of laughter, which continued for several lived. At any late, if t y to violate till undercceel
Minded, he cle ari CIPP red tq, 0
seconds)—if he did so, he (11Ir. Ferrand) would never be put the measure they had
in the position in which he had been repeatedly and unjustly solve the Parliament aPrirnclthl
measurer. eeotoes or s_et
QObsl
placed.—( Hear, hear.) The Hon. and Learned Member for sitting in judgment en
Russell to the teat rat:4oleme're,
Bath, who talked so much of gentlemanly proceedings, and letter of Lord Johnbr
in )tieffirord the Peel' 0, refef,h,
which he st,al‘„ tbe teeretoele
referred to the resolution formerly passed, should apply those London in December, s
observations and that resolution to his own case. He said that questions Hear, hear.)why !sciateffeei
he never spoke with unnecessary acerbity, or acted in a per- expressions of thep
" to understatid had eon _ (tr..41:1
sonal and unbecoming manner. This was not the fact. It at a. loss nownt
principles
the"peopie.rroeotrtr;
ought aiwnabyin._to( be decided tulle 17/iii,t
On a former octear.i
froinh sew"
n`lowm
were..
the i‘sio..-
was not the first time that he had violated the rules of the Lord did not carry the
House and offended gentlemanly manners. He (Mr. Disraeli) call on the Governmentonnf oto,.,apjleeaLl Lord stated titat!tin'ajreitosttilo:de
knew not of one case, but of repeated instances, in which be being pre...o that
ever; 100;
(the Hon. and Learned Gentleman) had accused himself (Mr. opinionswhereehaad altered his ()Orlin"' ;erieraillet. fro elt:ce;
Disraeli) of the most .improper and corrupt motives. Various Re stated
theY
essee in vestr7,ool
have been the occasions on which the Hon. and Learned that free-traite- principles were
Member would immediately get pp and iinpute motives and at- But he Ba,nfktese) c
o
u
n
t
try as elPorf the lateelhoit° sbefx
tribute corrupt intentions to Hon, Members- who differed with to the opinions
h Lord of the we _toe „el(
him in opinion. Some Hon. Members, thus referred to have tions. Let them lock
to the result 4dmiraltY; eretesr,,
noticed these attacks, but he (Ikli. Disraeli) never-had done se. election. Where was t e
Perhaps he oeght to have vindieated himself against tie Hon. represented that city ?
Member, ho
bola oo
(Sir Rober!_err: teade :11'1014
(lased!
and .Learned Member. 'but he 'never any wish to do so. distance.
h the gallery• )1 ,ens ....- se"
coed 0014,0
He.knew that as-the teed se-muithie the fruit.—(:Hear hear.) .which di
controverts °P."' net he 00,e vieoe
As a'crali tree. remit ?ring forth crab • appleseso malt a man between those did not
reach the
e ,
the
to
veen those con
d ide.
the Tel he ti iet
with an acid'nature:Wh toes Ithia -acid 'pamphlet tat-evince ad- them? The country would
deeeal as t
dity and bilterness ithisPeeehea--.(Laughter and Cheers.) vernment to undergo that or H` tuember , eoth 0034.10
But the Hon' aperLeareed-Gentlemao says .that heel: never unequivie,ernalhlyeraaloafinstthtahtenitiou,-I,
offeaded the-rules -Of the Flouseror imputedirapi.eitier otivet. "man
and were told thirty' te
This was totally ioaccurete. It wont's]. !be-sin:the reedlation :ale; eria-setserits,
pocket instead' of 'Rem.
ecereyeo_twreitateeefitrt teopeu.
Hon. Members:dna the colitrary. was:theastithevitd hat had their bee