The Sun.
London, England, 1846-10-13 00:00:00

treatment he had received, and was under a surgeon's
hands.

Other wi:n,:.sses corroborated the evil; nee of the com-
plain anr.

Mr. Cravi] sail the as cult was a most cowardly and
hfutAl one, for winch he should send both pr:so..ers for
trial.—They were both com►nitte:i accordingly.

THE REGISTRATIONS.
CITY OF LONDON.
On Saturday Mr. T. J. Arnold revised the list of
voters for the parish of St. Giles Without, the only
parish in Cripplegate ward; and the list-' for the pa-
rishes of St. Augustine, Christ Church, and St. Faith-
under-St. Paul, in the ward of Farringdon Within.
Henry Fendt, who was on the list for premises in
Bridgewater-gardens, in the parish of St. Giles With-
out, Cripplegate, was objected to by Mr. Luckett
(the Conservative objector) on the ground that he was
an alien.

Mr. Fendt appeared and was sworn; and
Mr. Brown, who supported the objection, asked him
whether he was born in England.
Mr. Fendt refused to answer the question; and
Mr. Ledger (the Liberal agent) submitted that he was
justified in this refusal, on the ground that a man c:Auld
not be called upon to answer questions the replies to
which might lead to his disfranchisement.
Mr. ARNOLD considered the question was one which
might properly be put to the witness; but he (Mr.
Arnold) thought it right to state t!.at he had no power
to compel the witness to answer it.

The question was pressed by Mr. Brown, but Mr,
Fendt positively refused to answer it ; and us no evi•
denc .1 was adduced to prove the validity of the objection;
the name was retained.
The following is the result of the clay's revision:—
Sustained. Failed or
withdrawn.

Conservative objections 95
1.1.
Liberal 5
Double 9
.•••
Liberal claims 1
It is expected that the revision will be concluded on
Saturday next.
Mr. ARNOLD proceeded yesterday with the revision of
the lists for the parishes of St. Martin, Ludgate ; St.
Matthew, Friday-street ; St. Faith-under-St. Paul ; St.
Michael le Quern ; St. Peter, Westcheap ; St. Vedast,
, Holborn ; St. Bartholomew
aliasth the Great,
r ;
an dS. St.tA ndreßartholomeww the Less, comprised in
the wards of Farringdon Within and Farringdon With-
out, north side.

The REVISING BARRisTEngave his decision in the case
of 'rooms Parsons, who had claimed to be registered
for "rooms " in Aldermanbury, and whose case came
before the Court last week.

It appeared that Mr. Parsons occupied two rooms, be-
tween which there was an internal communication, on
the third floor, and a cellar, which was used as a work-
shop, on the basement story of the same house. The
three rooms were rented by the claimant from the same
landlord. There was no internal communication between
the cellar and the rest of the house, and there was a
distinct entrance from the street into the cellar or work-
shop. The annual value of the three rooms together
was upwards of 101., but the value of the two rooms or
of the cellar separately was below that sum. The claim
to be rated was for " two rooms" only.
Mr. ARNOLD said, the first question in this case was
whether the two rooms on the third floor and the cellar
(lid not constitute two separate and distinct buildings,
which could not be joined together for the purpose of
conferring a qualification. But supposing that these
separate rooms could be regarded as constituting one
building, the question arose whether the claim to be
rated, which was for " two rooms" only, was a sufficient
cairn to be rated for the two rooms and the cellar. Al-
though he entertained some doubt on the last point, if
the case had rested upon that point solely, he would have
been disposed to consider it a virtual rating ; but as-the
cellar appeared to be a separate and distinct tenement
from the other two rooms, he must decide against the
claimant.

The following statement shows the result of the day's
revision : Failed or
Sustained.
withdrawn.
98

Conservative objections 69
Liberal 8
Double l5
Liberal claims