The Sun.
London, England, 1846-05-18 00:00:00

Mr. Maher discharged; Mr. Irton selected, and added to the
Committee.

The Committee of Selection have nominated the following Select
Committees on Railway Groups :
A Committee consisting of—Hon. E. Yorke (Chairman); Hon. F.
Tollemache, Mr. Brocklehurst, Mr. D. B. Ker, and Sir W. James, to
whom they have referred the Bills comprised in Group No. 17 of Rail-
way Bills, viz. :
Manchester:and Poole,
•
Manchester and Southampton,
London and South-Western (Romney and Redbridge),
Tring,
and Basingstoke.
The Select Committee to meet on Monday, May 25, at one.
A Committee consisting of-31r. Vernon (Chairman), Mr. Traill,
Mr. F. W. Knight, Mr. Borthwick, and Mr.
Ackers, to whom they
have referred the Bills comprised in Group No. 24 of Railway
Bills, viz. :
Ipswich and Bury St. Edmund's (Cambridge and Ely Extension),
Ely and Bury,
Newmarket and Chesterford.
Thetford, Bnry St. Edmund's, and Newmarket.
The Select Committee to meet on Thursday, May 28, at one.
A Committee consisting of—Lord Dalmeny (Chairman), Mr. St.
John Mlldmay, Mr. Marton, Mr. Matheson, and Viscount .3.1 Mon, to
whom they have referred the Bills comprised in Group No. 2$ pf
Railway Bills, viz.:—
London and Birmingham (Newport Pagnell Branch),
Hertford and Hatfield,
London and Birmingham (St. Alban's and Luton Branch),
London and York (St. Alban's, Litton, and Damnable Branch),
Extra Northern and Southern.

The Select Committee to meet on Monday, May 25, at one.

A Committee consisting of—the Hon. A. Liddell (Chairman), Mr.
T. D. Acland, Sir A. Armstrong, Mr. Antrobus, and Mr. Du Pre, to
whom they have referred the Bills comprised in Group No. 39 Of Ball.
way Bills, viz.:—
Manchester and Leeds (Railway Extension, &c.), '
Huddersfield and Manchester (Oldham Branch),
Oldham District,
Oldham, Liverpool, Manchester, and Birkenhead Jtmction,
Huddersfield and Manchester (Cooper Bridge Branch).
The Select Committee to meet on Thursday, May 28, at one.
nfrinivhnogmb talzywhoaivv.
E A Committee consisting of—Mr. Parker (Chairman), Dr. Bowfin&
to
of Arundel and Surrey, Sir A. Brooke, and Captain Dalrymple.
Railway Bills, viz •
e.e—rill'eaferarrpedtonth, aenßdill3Dudlcoemy,priBed in Group No. b 3 Of
Birmingham Iv Lines), , olverharopton. and Stour Valley (Birmingham, &c.,
Birmingham, Wolverhampton.
South Staffordshire Junction,
and Stour Valley (Stour Valley Line),
South Staffordshire Junction (riiisto
South
stairorashire
junction n and Prestfleld Branch),
(Willenhall - arta Bloxwich Branch),
Trent Valley, Midlands, and Grand Junction,
Birmingham, Lichfield, and Manchester.
Derbyshire, Staffordshire, and Worcester Junction,
Shropshire Union Railway and Canal (Shrewsbury to Stafford),
Shropshire Union Railway and Canal (Chester and Wolverharaptozi
Line),
Shrewsbury and Birmingham,
Shrewsbury, Wolverhampton, & South Staffordshirejunction (Ro. I),
Shrewsbury, Wolverhampton, & South Staffordshire Junction (No. 2).
The Select Committee to meet on Monday, May 25, at one.

The Committee of Selection have appointed the Select Committees
on the Groups /cos. 33, 38, 41, 46, 49, and 57, to meet in the Week
commenchq Monday, Juno 8.

, • FRIDAY, MAY 13.
The following Petitions for a Railway Bill were withdrawn :
Boston, Newark, and Sheffield, and Nottingham and Grant/MI
Junction.
Great Grimsby,,Louth, Horncastle, Lincoln, and Midland auction,
Grand Trunk or Stafford and Peterborough Union.
STANDING ORDERS' COMMITTEE?
The following resolutions were reported from this Committee:—
That, in the case of the Edinburgh and Peebles Railway BM,
clauses proposed on the further consideration of the report, clause (A)
is of such a nature as may be adopted without the re-commitment of
the Bill, if the House shall think flt:—That clause (B) is of such a
nature as not to be entertained without the re-commitment *1 the

•
That, in the case of the London and Birmingham Extension,
Northampton, Daventry, Leamington, and Warwick Railway peti-
tion, the standing orders ought not to be dispensed with.
That, in the case of the Northampton and Banbury Railway peti-
tion, the standing orders ought not to be dispensed with.
That, in the case of the Colchester, Stour Valley, Sudbury, and
Halstead Railway petition to read the Bill a third time the sessional
order ought to be dispensed with :—That the parties be permitted VI
read Bill a third time accordingly—Report to lie on the table.