The Sun.
London, England, 1841-10-23 00:00:00

Azt4t.

LONDON:
SATURDAY, OCTOBER 23, 1841.

The Christine insurrection having signallyfailed in Spain, we learn that the Ex-REGENT
has consented to give the Spanish Ambassador a
declaration, Signed with her own hand, solemnly
disavowing any concurrence in the plans of the
nsurgents. The misguided men having failed to
overthrow the Government, their perfidious Pa-
troness coolly strips them of any claim which
they might otherwise set up for the exercise of
the Royal clemency in their behalf, by protest.'
ing, in the face of heaven and earth, that they acted
not under any instructions received from her.
And wherefore, our readers will ask, does
CHRISTIN • act with such Perfidy towards unfortunate men Is it that elm
is ashamed. of openly incurrin
sarketib g the infamy of
the ning ;s:, Min deromurderousMidnight attack upon
sort. Cust ice (?f her own chtuAteil Nothing of the i
immt 31ux0z, seeing that she cannot
recover the- Regency; Nyants to.se-eure. tire vast

. -•••

property which FERDINAND, in his dotage, be-
stowed upon her in Spain. It is not a-regar&
for her character, but a solicitude for the safety
of her money-bags, that influences her present
conduct. She could not avow her participa-
tion in the insurrection without exposing her do-
mains to confiscation, and of her vastwealth there
is not a single dollar which she does not prize
above the heart':-blood of the unfortunate General
LEON and all his misguided accomplices. We
have little doubt that the Spanish Government,
which is no stranger to her cupidity, took care
to place this view of the question before her in a
strong light. The Spanish Minister at Paris,
Senor OLOZAGA, appears to have acquitted him-
self with signal ability under very trying circum-
stances. It may be reasonably inferr.d from his
letter to General ALCALA, that he lost no time
in making CHRISTINA acquainted with her exact
position, and of the necessity of her assuming
one less suspiciously hostile, if she was not
prepared to go all lengths with her parti-
san. We moreover know that the strong
remonstrances addressed by OLOZACIA to the
French Government kept Louts PHILIPPE

_ .
within bounds, when his Majesty had all bu

made up his mind to throw off the mask,
and declare openly for O'DONNELL and the
CHRISTINA insurgents. We have heard, and
readily believe, that Senor OLOZAGA met with
the cordial support of the English Government.
This was what CHRISTINA MUNOZ and her par-
tizans.were not at all prepared for; seeing that
they were ready to gratify the. Tories,by abolish-
ing the Constitution. But the Tories well knew
that a crusade against Spanish liberty for the
purpose of placing a son of the Xing of the
FRENCH on the throne of ISABELLA IL would
doom them to everlasting reprobation, and they
very prudently declined being dupes to any such
infamous transaction.

One important and salutary fact is established
by the attempted insurrection in favour of
CHRISTINA MUNOZ in Spain—namely, that the
bulk of the inhabitants desire nothing so ar-
dently as peace. In the insurgents' bands hardly
a man was comprehended but the soldiers and
their officers, who deserted Don CARLOS and
accepted the Convention of Bergara. These
men, suspected by all parties and trusted by
none, grew exceedingly dissatisfied with their
condition. In Valencia the REGENT endeavoured
to promote them to offices of trust, in common
with the rest of their fellow-countrymen, but
such was the outcry raised against them by the
friends of those whose blood they had shed when
in the service of Don CARLOS, that he was con-
strained to cancel their appointments. Their
chief, General MAROTO, remonstrated privately
and publicly, but the people were inexorable.
Despised by the Carlists, who remained faithful
to their principles, and distrusted by the loyal
subjects of the young QUEEN, these men
readily hearkened to the proposals made to them
by the agents of CHRISTINA MuNoz. The King
of the FRENCH, who did not discriminate between
them and the old legions of ESPARTERO, readily
gave credence to their report that the army was
wholly disaffected to the present Government.
The signal failure of the expedition, and the loss
of his forty thousand pounds, will cure the King
of the FRENCH of his oresent itch for meddling
so deeply in Spanish politics.
_ _ _

It is deeply to be deplored that the state of pub-
lic feeling in Spain imposes .upon the REGENT the
necessity of making severe examples of the mis-
guided men who are taken in arms against the
Government. But in a country, where every act
of clemency is imputed to weakness, and there-
fore but the provocative to future rebellion, a
mistimed leniency is often the greatest cruelty.
Still we trust that every precaution will be
adopted to avoid the useless effusion of blood.
While on the one hand it may be absolutely ne-
cessary to convince the people that the crime of
rebellion never goes unpunished, it cannot be less
necessary on the other to avoid familiarising them
with the brutalizing spectacle of numerous
capital punishments. There are few wholesome
moral lessons to be learned under the gallows, or
within hearing of a murderous fusilade. A few
severe examples in different parts of Spain may
unhappily be called for, but a Government so
strong as the REGENT'S no longer requires the
aid of terror to-maintain it against an enemy so
utterly wanting in every great and good quality
as MARIA CHRISTINA MUNOZ.

While the young QUEEN remains unmarried
she will continue an apple of discord to Spain.
When, therefore, ESPARTERO has rid his hands
of the insurrection in the Basques, he ought to
lose no time in betrothing his youthful Sove-
reign to her cousin, the son of the Infante Don
FRANCISCO DE PAULA, who, by this time, has
arrived in Madrid. This step will put arstop to
the intrigues of the French Court for the hand
of the young QUEEN, and rn.-re than any other
consolidate the affections of the Spanish people.
Already has M. THIERs and an influential body
of French statesmen declared in favour of such a
match. It has, therefore, the advantage of satis-.
Lying all moderate men in. France, while afford-
ing no ground for uneasiness to England.

IThere are few habitual readers of The Sun who
will feel disposed to question our veracity, when
we state that of our daily Contemporaries no
other Journal can be named which has more in-
variably advocated extensive improvements in
the materiel and personnel of the British navy.
Not only have our leading columns been more
extensively devoted to subjects connected with
the improvement of the Navy than those of any
other London daily Paper, except, perhaps, the
Times, but we have gone out of our way—which
the Times has not—to give increased circulation
to every article on the question of Naval Reform,
which we regarded as at all calculated to benefit
that measure. We suffered no petty jealousy to
influence us in the discharge of a public duty.
We did not stop to ask whether the Journal
from which we were about to quote, ever quoted
us. 'Enough that it manifested a sympathy with
us in a common object to obtain for its opinions
all the increased circulation which we could give
to it. Acting upon this high and disinterested'
principle, we quoted, on Thursday, a part ofan
article from the Herald of that morning, which,
with some very proper remarks on the inade-
quacy of the pay of officers and men in the Bri-
tish Navy, as compared with the navy of the
United States, contained a very foul and calum-
nious attack up)n Mr. Huarn.
While we did every justice to what was
true in that article, We took care to guard
,against misconception on the part of .our
readers, by exposing the
astigation of the Hera
partisanship, Which dictated Petty, ignorant
ld,sirmitosrfiartilsceehioloads: Our
turned the tables upon
how-
ever, stung that J..nirual to thequick. Havinn-
,
the Herald by proving,
from HANSARD'S" Parliamentary I:1 ebates," that
the Tories now in office were
gtiilty of the paltry
disingen'
economy which it falsely imputed to Mr HUME
with a
our Contemporary,
t.tousness'
worthy of a pettifogging attorney, triumphantly
appeals to the tenour of made I speeches •
n the
House of Commons by that Gallant and Ho-
nourable Officer, Admiral Sir E • C ODRINGTON•
How is it that the, Herald makes no quotations
from these speechs? Why does it not silence
us with the Admiral's testimony in his own
words, either from HANSARD or the Nirror
of Parliament ? We . cal give the true
answer to these questions. Because the Gallknt
Admiral said not a word to'the purpose imputed
to him by the Herald.
• What Mr. Humn
hat, Admiral Sir C. COD-
contended
....
contended fur, and w
d of in his Parliamentary
conduct, was a reduction, not of the pay, but of
the number of the force maintained in a time of
E Humnever, advocated
profound peace. Mr.
the reduction of the wages of seamen in active
on re-
service, nor of the pensions granted them
tiring from such service. On the contrary, he-
repeatedly stated in the House of. Commons, dtn:7
ing -his long and distinguished career of useful-
ness in that HouSe, that our sailors. were not ade-.
.quately remunerated, and that one of .the first.
;stops towards the abolition Of ini- essiiient w.atf-i

~,__
~ti {2 .1 Ji .. .

..e. *--

to increase seamen's wages on board all vessels
in her MAJESTY.S service. As the Herald claims
the distinctiol of an acquaintance with naval af-
fairs, so far back as 1688, it may be unnecessary
to remind it that the Right Hon. Netherby Rat,
Sir J. GRAHAM, took an active share in support-
ing the good old starvation, cat-o'-nine-tails, im-
pressment system.

The Herald takes great credit to itself for
having awakened public attention to the neces-
sity of reforming the Navy. This is parodying
the fable of the fly on the back of the ox after a
very ridiculous fashion. But for its falsehoods,
the article in the Herald would not have elicited
a syllable of remark, much less of controversy
and had it not descended to particulars, even
its calumnies would not have been deemed.wor-
thy of notice. But when, it, has the audacity, in
the case of a public man, whose opinions are so
well known as those of Mr. HUME, to substitute
for a reduction of the naval force of the country
in time of peace, a proposed reduction in sea-
men's wages, and to appeal for a confirmation
of the falsehood to so distinguished an officer as
Admiral Sir E. CODRINGTON, then indeed it
would be criminal to suffer its calumnies to pass
without contradiction and reproof.
• Now that there is an apprehension of a war
with the United States, the Tory papers disco-
ver that our gallant seamen are under-paid.
The Sun made the same discovery ten years ago,
when there was no prospect of a war with any
Power. During all that period we never allowed
the Navy Estimates to be brought forward
without advocating the claims of our gallant
naval defenders to an increased rate of remu-
neration. Even now the Herald can get no
lower than a midshipman, whereas we never lost
sight of the brave fellows before the mast. Tory
sympathy for the people never manifests itself
but when they are called upon to shed their
blood for the aristocracy. On the eve of a bat-
tle •" privates" are addressed by Princes as
" fellow-soldiers," and endearing appeals are
made to their love of a country which awards
them sixpence a day for the loss of a leg. When
sailors are wanted to be shot, by way of holocaust
to the national honour, Tory Journals humanely
contend for the adoption of such a scale of remu-
neration as shall obtain from the victims a volun-

tary consent to run the chance of being so sacri•
ficed. This does not proceed from any re-
gard for the interests of the naval ser-
vice, farther than it secures immunity from
danger to the aristocracy. The people
have grown too enlightened for the gag-
ging, impressment system, and the Tories foresee
that in no extremity dare the Government again
have recourse to it. Hence their solicitude
for anticipating an outbreak with America by
such an increase in the wages of seamen as shall
keep them from deserting to the ranks of the
enemy. Even the Herald avows this. Were
there no apprehension of the desertion of our
seamen for a service in which they would be
better paid, not a stiver would the Tories consent
to give them more than they at present receive.
In the eyes of the Tories they are mere mercen-
aries, and as mercenaries only do they propose
to the Government to make sure of their services.
How very different is this from the principle
upon which The Sun always advocated some rate
of fair proportion between the rewards of the
aristocracy and the people when employed in the
common service of their country.

Our readers will see, in another part of our
paper, a melancholy instance of the tyranny
which the Established clergy are in the habit of
practising upon the poor. The Curate of Mar-
den, a parish in Wiltshire, refused to bury the
body of a parishioner with all the usual rites,
because he praised the Ranters, and said neither
Church nor parsons were necessary for salvation:
The clergyman would not suffer the body to be
carried into the church, but would condescend to
repeat part of the service in the churchyard, and
proceeded to perform the ceremony, when the re-
latives of the deceased rejected his assistance.
The body was hurried into the grave, the parson
was hooted out of the' churchyard; and when
he commenced- his usual duties on the Sabbath
all but four or five left the church. Dissent is
increasing in every direction, Church-rates are
refused, and the great bodY,of the people look
upon- the parsons as their bitterest enemies. Will
conduct like this bring back the scattered flock
to the fold ?

We cannot disregard the appeal made to the
,impartial justice of the public press by the meet-
ing of the Trades' De!egates of London, held
last night, to take into consideration the strike of
the masons at the new Houses of Parliament.
When questions affecting the interests of large
bodies of the community, however humble their
position in society, are brought fairly and regularly
before us, we are always willing to treat them
in a spirit of the utmost fairness. If we can
be accused of a bias, from which few mortals
are entirely free, it is of never leaning to the
side of the strong against the weak, of taking
part of the powerful oppressor against the
helpless oppressed. But in the case of the
masonic strike, we have not hitherto had all
the facts sufficiently before us. What the masons-
stated one day Messrs. GRISSELL and PETO con-
tradicted the next, so that we could only advance
conjectures amidst a host of clashing assertions.
But the meeting held last night was a step to-
wards the placing a full, clear, and true state-
ment of facts before the country. Now, all the
statements made at that meeting are yet open
to contradiction. They are ex-parte, in-
asmuch as neither Mr. GRISSELL nor Mr.
PETO, nor their foreman, Mr. ALLEN, are
reported to have been present. But should the
statements of the Chairman of that meeting, Mr.
WORTHINGTON, not be :contradicted—should the
silence of ALLEN and his employers leave
no doubt on the public mind of their truth—
. then, speaking under that supposition, we
regard the conduct of Messrs. GRISSELL
and PETO in not discharging ALLEN as
highly reprehensible. The instances of tyranny
adduced by WORTHINGTON against ALLEN, if
true, are so atrociously unnatural that we find
the utmost difficulty in believing that
they could take place in a Christian coun-
try. A young man requests a fortnight
to go down to Manchester to bury his mother ;
instead of being commended for his filial piety,
an insolent foreman restricts him to two days, at
the peril of losing his work. The poor young man
is expected to entomb a parent as he would bury
a dog, without being allowed a single day
to visit her grave and commune with his
own heart. He is a poor working man, and is
therefore expected to have no feelings apart from
those of labouring a certain number of hours for
a certain rate of wages. The next instance of
alleged tyranny is, if possible, grosser still. A
mason went to catch the last breath ofa dying wife;
he stopped to see her remains decently restored
to their mother earth, and on returning heart-
stricken to his employment is met by a foreman
who tells him to "go and die with her and be
d—d !" Need we trouble our readers with fur-
ther instances of tyranny, so revolting to the
dearest feelings of our common nature, cited at
this meeting ? Is there any act of oppression
that could be disbelieved of a man capable of
committing one or the other of those to which
we have so briefly alluded ?
The meeting of the Trades' last night was an
adjourned one, so that an opportunity will
next week be afforded to Messrs. thus-
SELL and PETO to contradict the state-
ments of the Chairman, should they
-happen to be unfounded. For our own
part, we are - not in a condition to
decide upon the question one way or the other.
We repeat once for all, that what we have written
above is based on the hypothesis that the state-
inents made at the meeting gare true.

IE
is with the deepest regret we announce our
apprehensions that incendiarisin is again begin-
ning to prevail. More than one incendiary fire
has aleadY taken- .place in. Yorkshire; the
Brightoz ,Herald giveapn account of the wilful


771(
n_trning of a wheat-r 1 IJ-ear Arundel; and
sever,' other ,proyincial,journals contain- state-
. merits of similar :atrocities. - These are ominous
signs, and such as Ministers will do well to
take heed to betimes. They indicate a feverish
and alarming state of things which requires a far
proMpter and more efficient remedy than Sir. R.
PEEL seems inclined to apply—that. is. to say-,:
provided he can first obtain the permission of his
aristocratic task-masters. Incendiarismis not a
danger that lies merely on the surface; and none
should know this better than the Tories, whose
last days,Or power, in the. year 1830, were ren-
dered remarkable by the blazing of barns
hand haystacks all over the country.
With the.. expulsion of these men from office
ceased the:atrocities of Swing; with their return
to Downing-street, he, too, renews his'old career.
of crime and desperation-. Will the Tories tell
us after this that there is a reaction in favour of
•Toryistn throughout the country ; and that the
starving' and destitute operatives are perfectly
content to wait till February for .an inquiry into
their:, case PEEL would have us-believe
that they are-;: and when his attention is directed
to the,state of the manufacturing districts; When
he is informed by, those who are thoroughly ac-.
quainted with, the subject, that trade is notonly lan-'
guishing, but in many towns in a state of Utter stag-
nation; that thousands who last year were compa-
ratively Well off; are row unable to find so much
as a small loaf for the day's scanty meal ; —when'
these facts are brought home to Sfr,R. PEEL,
how does he reply ? By reading- sorne paltry
partial Savings' Banks statistics in:Parliarnthlt;
which, so far from assisting his 'ease, make it
stronger than ever against him ! As he
.has
resolutely turned a deaf ear to the cry of
despair and starvation that- has reached him from
the manufacturing districts, we are
_not without
our apprehension's that, in the alarming instance
,of incendiarism, he will-content himself with pu-
nishing the crime, -without trOubling himself to
investigate 'endremove the cause. The following
extract from the., Western Times will show that
we have not exaggerated the present distresses
of the people—

" The state of the county becomes every day more ap-
palling. Famine stares the masses in the face. The
failure of the potatoe crop, owing to the extreme wet-
ness of the weather, and the widespread devastation of
the floods, will add greatly to the misery of a deficient
grain crop. Sir,.Tiobert Peel has prorogued the Parlia-
ment, but he. has not stifled the cries of the suffering
millions. The approaching winter is viewed with appre-
hension by all classes."

The whole of the Paris Journals of Thursday
have reached us. The following telegraphic de-
spatches with news from Spain appear in the
official columns of the Moniteur of that day :

" BAYONNE, OCT. 18.
" THE SUB-PREFECT TO THE MINISTER OF THE INTERIOR.
" On the 14th General Ayerbc went out of Pampeluna,
and marched against O'Donnell."

" BA YONNE, OCT. 19.
. ,
“ THE SUB-PREFECT TO THE MINISTER OF THE INTERIOR.
" It is affirmed that O'Donnell has effected his junc-
lion with Urbistondo at Tolosa. Iturbe has joined Al-
cala at Hernani. Their advanced guard was at Andoain.
According to the .Ministerial journal the Expectadur of
.the 12th, the Regentilias sent orders to Don Francisco
to suspend his enttance into Spain." •

" BAYONNE, OCT. 19.
" THE SUB-PREFECT TO THE-MINISTER OF THE INTERIOR.
" On the 16th, O'Donnell gained possession of Estella.
Urbistondo was in the morning of the 18th at Tolosa,
and Alcala at Andoain. The Carlist Colonel Lanz is
scouring the frontier •at Navarre, at the head of some
:old officers and soldiers of his party, seconding O'Don-
nell. Affairs were itethe same state at Pampeluna, in
the evening of the titlr:l Ayerbe has entered the town,
and did not march with the two battalions sent against
O'Donnell."
.

"PERPIGNAN, OCT. 19.
" THE GENERAL COMMANDING THE 21ST MILITARY

• DIVISION TO THE MINISTER OF WAR.
" Tho municipality of Valencia declared itself on the
14th to be in permanence, and now governs. It has de-
cided upon raising a third battalion of National Guards,
to be composed of men of the port and sailors from the
Grao. Each alcade is preparing a list of suspected per-
sons within his quarter. None but the patriots are al •
lowed to go out of the town. Entrance has been refused
to three companies of the Regiment of Savoy, coming
from Alicant. General Seoane returned to Valencia
on the evening of the 14th."

" BAYONNE, OCT. 20.
"THF. SUE-PREFECT TO THE 3IINISTER OF THE INTERIOR.
" Yesterday, at 12 o'clock, Alcala was to march to Her-
nani. It appears certain that 1,500 yplunteers from Na-
varro have taken part ibrth O'Donnell "
From these despatches it would appear that
the insurrection is not sp,near suppressed as was
at first supposed. _ Hence CHRISTINA Murroi's
disavowal of the "ItIV(U-," attributed to her by
the Spanish Ambassador. 'When insurrection
appears to succeed.she grows anxious to take
advantage of it. The Times, however, publishes
the following extract from a letter from Paris,
dated " Thursday, clock, n. 31.," which gives
a very different account -of the prospects of
Madame MUNOZ and her partisans

" You may regard the insurrection in Spain as at an
end. The principal chiefs of it ar© either arrested or
have taken refuge in France. Among the former is M.
pontes de Oca.

" The regiments which had taken part in the revolt
have submitted to the Regent, and have taken anew the
oath of fidelity to the present Government ; of these the
Regiment de Bourbon is the most important.
" The entire population of the country through which
the army of Rodil passed submitted.
" I wrote you to-day that by arrivals of the 17th
inst., from Barcelona, the
,tevolutionary movement in
that city continued. The'Japublicans of Barcelona
have made an appeal to the Republicans of France."
The following extractsinclude all the news to
be found in the Journals of Thursday :
A correspondent of tho Spanish frontier writes to the
Presse—" Hitherto the troops of both parties in the
Basque provinces have respected all the couriers of
Foreign Cabinets. Esparter&s General (Alcala) has
become the first to fail in this 'respect. He stopped, at
Andoain, the last courier sent by the. French Govern-
ment to its Charge d'Affaires at Madrid, and compelled
him to return to Bayonne." _
The French penal cods, which, sup to the present time,
had remained in force in the Rhe'nish provinces of Hesse.
Cassel; has been by a' new. German code,
which was solemnly promulgated.on the 13th inst..
The collection of works of art left by Goethe, the'Ger-
man poet, are to be immediately brought to public sale.
They are said to be of great value, and several German
sevens are employed in preparing the catalogue.
The Viyie de l' Ouest gives the following account of an
occurrence near Newfoundland :—" For many years
past, when fish began to get scarce at Newfoundland,
both the English and French fishermen have been in the
habit of fishing off the little island called Belle-Isle,
which was considered neutral ground. This year our
fishermen were as usual fishing quietly at this spot, when
an English corvette perceiving them, sent a boat to plant
the. British flag upon the island, and then insolently or-
dered our fishermen to leave, threatening to fire • upon
them in the event Of refusal. _This. hew act of English
piracy has been communicated by-Capt. Collet, of the
brig Hippolyte-Marie, which has just arrived at La Ro-
chelle from Newfoundland."
A-Bayonne correspondent writes to the Memorial
Bordelais The opposition -journals have made Spain
a terrible residence for the French. Being accused of
tliC pi-est:tat evils in
,the country, they cannot pass along
the high road Without liability to the vengeance of the
exasperated people. In the Tertullias, coffee-houses, and
all other public places, nothing iesheard but impreca-
tions against the French. The Spaniards say, .there
can be no doubt' of the connivance of the French Govern-
ment at the aetssof the insurgents, since the French
journals themselves-announce the fact.' "
A letter frotre-WarsaW states that
.an Ukase has been
published; ordering that all accounfs Poland shall be
kept in Russian money, and that i_the Russian silver
rouble shall be the standard of the '4.irelilating mediUm.
A young idiotic girl of Felletin, in the Ceeuse, being
.
a few days ero left in a loft, amused herself with igniting
a number of eheinieal nroches, and thereby set fire to
quantities of straw and brdom. The flames spread with
such rapidity; that
great part of the most populous
y
quarter of the village was burnt down without the possi-
bility of saving any of the furniture and effects. No.
part of the property was insured.
" We are expressl authorised to declare publicly,"
says the Joternal des Debuts, " that the words attributed
to Maria Christina in the despatch sent by the Spanish
Minister to General Alcala, have already been formally
disavowed by the Queen, and that this disavowal has
been addressed to M. Olozaga, himself by her Majesty's
Secretary." On the same subject. the .Presse says-
-
" From sources which we have every reason to believe
correct, we learn that M. Olozaga having in another
document argued upon the same words, they have been
officially disavowed
in the name of the Queen by her
Secretary, and that this disavowal' has-been in .the hands
of the Ambassador five or six (lays." -••
The following is from the Courrier Fr;ineais :—" One
of the principal employes.vf the Minister of Marine, who
was sent to England a month ago, has returned to Paris,
and is preparing a report on the British navy. It appears
that' he satisfied himself that, at the inommit 'when the
British Cabinet was most vehement in its -demand for
the reduction of our navy, and -When our Ministry had
given an assurance that this measure would:: be shortly
carriesl into execution, the
English Admiralty. was giv-
ing orders for fitting nuts several seseelsk ,and building
others: We are assured that England -has at 111,6
ment ten more ships fitted but than bad,, July. last.;These facts might' 'certainly to
,4il6' riSe, to 090 e. !Knolls;
strances enthe_partOf our Cirbinet but Oref
of our cpmnsencesi,teerly:
ports; and it is. Tioi pis)baki, ib401.,.,4,p9ft150ned.",,
• Araillard .aa.cr Reirogawo -
Arrgite4-4 ttring• the .di4
turliaaget-itrititis44l4- ettli 7 -woe wreck., tome: Ate:,
• • •

:

..'„...t...'',j.--,