The Sun.
London, England, 1836-04-01 00:00:00

G~
~~

,
C'--1

THIS EVENING.

WAR,OFFICE, Ariti 1, 1836,

MEMORANDUM.

BANKRUPTS.

BROWN V. THORNTON.

uch progress as suffices to show that it affords sa-
tisfaction to no interest and to no party, not even to
its authors, whose parental fondness for their offspring
's manifestly cooled by the numerous exposures
which have been made of its vices and defects.
The settlement of the tithe question in England is
apparently more difficult and more distant now
than before Lord John Russell and his colleagues ven-
tured to meddle with the subject. The question of the
Irish Church, by Means of which Lord Melbourne's
Government forced itself into power, is to be kept in
hand, for sake, we suppose, of the chance that it may
again serve the same purpose, on some future occasion.
On this subject nothing has been done, nothing at-
tempted, nothing proposed. It follows of course that
MiniSters do not intend to• make any earnest and sin-
cere effort to settle it during the preient Session ; that
the tithe War is to go on for another year at thuleast ;
and that the zealous. adherents of the Administration
in Ireland, who conspire to rob the Protestant Clergy,
and to murder all who presume to aid in the enforce-
ment of their rights, are to be encouraged and protected
as heretefore. The measures intended for the gratifi-
cation of the Dissenting body, which were announced
with so much emphasis at the commencement of
the Session, have scarcely been mentioned since
that period. These.magnificent projects of ameliora-
tion seem to have dropped dead-born from the mouth
of the sagacious Minister who propounded them. It
has, probably, been discovered that the Dissenters are
not very anxious for the realisation of achemes which
promised to them in particular the honour and satis-
faction of having their nuptials graced, by the presence
of the relieving-officer of the poor, and to thei com-
munity in general the advantages of a domiciliary
visit from an officer of the same useful class, on the
occurrence' of every birth or death in their families.
We do not exactly know what has become of the IM-
prisonment for Debt Bill, which has supplied to his
Majesty's Attorney-General his chief employment,
am a legislator, for the last four years. The labour of
the Hon. and Learned Gentleman stands still, after
having undergone as many unravellings as Penelope's
web. Its completion seems to be more distant now
titan it did four years ago.—Morning Post.

'jjiE(ENT .

cHE LONDON GAZETTE

'sth Regiment of Dragoon Guards—Assistant Surgeon C. H.
Carnegy,M.D., from the 68th Regiment, to be Assistant-Surcon,
vice Foster, promoted in the 70th Regiment, April 1.
12th Regiment of Light Dragnons—Surgeon J. Moffat, from the
70th Regiment to be Surgeon, Winterscale, whose appointment has
not taken place, Apiil 1.
15th Regiment of Light Dragoons—Lieut. Hickmann to be
Captain by purchase, vice Wood, who retires ; Cornet H. W. S.
Lowndes to be Lieutenant, by purchase, vice Hickman ; H. L.
Cacksedge, Gent., to be Cornet, by purchase, vice Lowndes ;
April 1.
_ _

3d Regiment of Foot—Lieut. R. H. Peel, from the half-pay
rnatached, to_be Lieutenant, vice Clarke, appointed to the 17th
Regiment, April 1.
9th -FoOt—Major H. Fane, from the half-pay Unattached, to be
Major, vice W. Seward, who exchanges, receiving the difference,
April T.
10th Foot—J. H. Grant, Gent. ,:to be Ensign, without purchase,
vice Wynyard, promoted in the 17th Regiment, April 2.
17th Foot—Major H. Croker to be Lieutenant-Colonel, without
purchase ; Captain G. J. Romney to be Major, vice Croker;
Lieut. T. H. Baylis to be Captain, vice Romney, April 1.
To be Lieutenants, without purchase—Licut. R. G. Johnstone,
from the 20th Regiment; Lieut. A. Dickson, from the 31st Re-
giment; Lieut. E. Dalgety, from the 20th Regiment; Lieut.. F.
'A. Wetherell, from the 44th Regiment ; Lieut. F. F. Mathews,
from the 2d West India Regiment; Lieut. E. M. Clarke, from the
3d Regiment; Ensign J. F. De Teissier ; Ensign J. Stowell,
April 1.
To be Lieutenant, by purchase-,-Ensign W. B. Kelly, April 1.
To. bo be Lieutenants without purchase—Ensign S. Philips,
from the 54th Re,,iment ;‘ Ensign S. 8.,,W. Wynyard, from the
loth Regiment., vice t aylis, April 2.
To be Ensigns—Ensign E. F. Dimond, from the half payoff
t7te-Sth West India Regiment, vice De Tessier, promoted, Aprill,
I!. W. P. Welman,;Gent., vice Stowell, April 2.
' 20th Foot—F. Raikes, Gent., to be Ensign, without purchase,
vice Le Couteur, promoted in the:3lst Regiment, April 1.
El Ist Foot—Ensign P. Le Couteur, from the 20th Regiment,
to be Lieutenant, without purchase, vice Dickson, appointed to the
17ih Regiment, April 1.
39th Foot—Ensign W. Munro, to,be.Lieuterrant, by purchase,
vjie Hassard, who retires ; H. Neweumen, Gent., to be Ensign,
by purchase, vice Munro, April 1.
44th Foot—Ensign A. Hogg, to be, ":•/fientenazt,, 'without pur-
chase, vice Wetherall, appointed to the 17th Regiment ; Rnsign
W. M'Mahon, from the 81st Regiment,. loibe Ensign, vice Hogg,.
April 1.

54th Foot—Ensign J. Cameron, from the half-pay of the 92d
11.•Airnent, to be Ensign, vice Phil:l)3, appointed to fa.; ;7:4 Re-
giment, April 2.
53th Foot—Lieutenant W. Fisher from the 78th Regiment, to
be Lieutenant, vice Watson, appointed to the Ceylon Regiment,
April 1.
68th Foot—A,ssistant Surgeon C. Irving, from the 7th Regi-
ment, Assistant-Surgeon, vice Carnegy, appointed to the sth Dra-
goon Guards, April 1.
69th Foot—Lieu. W. Johnson, from the half-pay of the 46th
Regiment, to be Lieutenant, vice Wilson, appointed to the 73d
Regiment, April 1.
70th—Assistant-Surgeon J. Foster, M. D., from the Dragoon
Guards, to be Surgeon, vice Moffit, appointed to the 12th Light
Dragoons, April 1.
71st Foot—Lieut. T. Dutton to be Paymaster, vice Adams, ap-
pointed to a Recruiting District, April I.
73d Foot—Lieut. W. C. B. Wilson, from the 69th Regiment,
to be Lieutenant, vice E. H. Ffinney, who retires upon half-pay
of the 46th Regiment, April 1.
78th Foot—Lieut. W. Morris, from the 97th Regiment, to be
Lieutenant, vice Fisher, appointed to the 58th Regiment, April 1.
81st Foot—A. G. Shawe, Gent., to be Ensign, without pur-
chase; vice MacMahon, 'appointed to the 44th Regiment, April 1.
97th Foot—Lieut. R. Lisle, from the Ceylon Regiment, to be
Lieutenant, vice Morris, appointed to the 78th Regiment, April 1.
2cl West India Regiment—Captain F. G. Drewry, from the
half-pay Unattached, to be Captain, vice A. Bourke, who ex-
changes, receiving the difference, April 1; Lieutenant R. Belton,
from the half-pay of the 10th Regiment, vice Mathews, appointed
to the 17th Regiment, April 1.

Ceylon Rifle Regiment--Lieut. A. Watson, from the 58th Regi-
ment, to be Lieutenant, vice Lisle appointed to the 97th Regi-
ment, April 1.

The promotion of Assistant-Surgeon Foster, front the sth Dra-
goon Guards, to be Surgeon in the 71st Regiment, as stated in
tly. Gazette of the 18th March last, has not taken place.

SARAH EIIIZA MORGAN, boarding-house-keeper, Mon-
trgne-plaee, Old Kent-road.
WILLIAM GOODWIN, retailer of beer. Lock's-fields, Wal-
wlrth.
GEORGE BLAYLOCK, linen-draper, Bishopsgate-street.
THOMAS LUCK, dealer in lace, Lad-lane.
DANIEL BRETHERTON, horse-dealer, Manchester.
'JOHN TAYLOR, victualler, Birmingham.

CHANCERYCOURT-THURSDAY.

The LORD CHANCELLOR gave judgment in this case, in
which a bill had been filed for a discovery merely, and
where the defendant in answering the bill had referred to a
certain document. Application was therefore made for the
production of that document, on the trial of a cause in a
Court of common laW, which the Vice-Chancellor had or-
dered. 'Upon that order this 'appeal had been brought.
The Lord Chancellor, in giving judgment, said that the
rule at common law was, that if;the answer of a defendant
in equity was to be used by the plaintiff, he must read the
whole of the answer. The'document was to be treated as
a part: of the answer, and solar the plaintiff in equity would
he entitled to it ; but this Court:could not make an order
for the production of the document merely. To do so
would be'to go beyond the jurisdiction which the Court
assumed. It had the power to compel an answer ; but
when that answer was obtained the office of the Court was
at an end, and it could. gi,ve no,,directions respecting any
use that might be mAde of it in Any other Court. The
order for productiOn of the document-must therefore be
discharged.