The Sun.
London, England, 1831-11-14 00:00:00

NEWCASTLE CORN MARKET —Nov. LI

We had a supply of Wheat from the country today, with
some coasting arrivals during the week, for which there was a
good demand, and the whole sold readily at an advance of 2s. per
quarter. Many of the Oat samples were pure, and the supply
being large, that trade was very dull at a decline of Is. per quar-
ter. There is no south country Barley now in this market;, the
demand for Scotch has been steady during the week. Fine Malt
continues in demand. Some parcels of bonded Rye have been
bought at 265, per quarter for exportation, with little doing in
what is free for home consumption. Beans and Pease as our last.
New. Old.
Wheat, Northumberland Ric 665. —s. —s.'
Norfolk and Stifiblk 565. 655....... —B. —5.
Berwick and Scotch .58s. 625. —s. —s.
Foreign 52a. 66s —s. —s.
Rye, Norfolk and Suffolk --s. —s --s. —S.
Foreign 345. 375....... —s. —s. ~7
Barley, Malting, Norfolk and Suffblk 40i. 449 —s. —a. .1
Grinding and Feeding 245. 284 —s. —s. .2
Malt, Norfolk and Suffolk 666. 70; —s. —.S.
Beans, Small 4th. 42s ...,5. —s. a
Tick .38s. 40s .....8. ..., 01
Pease, White 446. 4E4s —s. —s.
Gray '3Bs. 405 —B. —B.
Oats, Northumberland, l'otatoe 25s 275. 2Bs. 30s.
_ Feed 018 225. 2ls. 255.
Foreign —B. —8 —B. —s
#
klour, Fine (per 5ack)...... ...... ... ......... —B' —6 463.5°6*

We are assured by a member of the Reform
Union Society, which meets at the Newmarket Coffee-
house, St. Martin's-lane, that the Society does not advocate
the principles of the ballot and universal suffrage, as erro-
neously stated a few days since in The St.n.

Several Anti-Reform Lords, amongst whom
we understand, v.lts the Marquis of Rune, passed through
this city, during the week, on their way to the North.
These noble personages, having in the course of fneir pro-
gress through several large towns, met with a kind and
but too.feeling reception from the inhabitants, deemed it
prudent to walk through our good city in dia4uise, and
resume their seats in their curiagel a little to the north of
Carfis/e Jovrwll.

SUPPLEMET to the LONDON GAZETTE
Of FRIDAY, dated SATURDAY, Nov. 12.

The names of those who were nominatod for Sheriffs by the
Lords of the Council, at the Exchequer, on the morrow of St.
Martin, in the second year of the reign of King William IV.,
and in the year of our Lord, 18.31. _ .

BEDFORDSHIRE.—Abraham Edward Gregory, of Biggleswatle,
Esq. ; Thomas Potter M`Queen, of Ridgmont, Esq. ; William

Stuart, of Tempsford, Esq.
BERKSHIRE.—East George Clayton East, of Hall-place, Esq. ;
Thomas Mills Goodlake, of Wadley.house, Esq.; Charles

Arch. Houblon, of Welford Park, Esq.
BUCKINGHAMSIIIRE.—WiIIiam Loundes, the younger, of Ches.
ham, Esq. ; George Spencer Ricketts, of Dorton house;

Esq. ; Sir It. Verney, of Claydon-house, Bart.
CAMBRIDGESHIRE AND HUNTISGDoNsHIaE.—Thomas• Orton, of
March, Esq. ; James Lee, of Upwell, Esq. ; Thomas Page, of
Ely, Esq.
CHESHIRE.—John Hurlstone Leche, of Cardin, Esq. ; James
Hammond, of Wintaton-hall, F4q. ; Robert Taylor, of Lyrmn.

hall, Esq.
C (NMI RL k D.—Henry Howard, of Corby Castle, Esq.; Richard
Ferguson, of Harker-lodge, Esq. ; Henry Curwen, of Work.

ington-hall, Eqq.
Peter, of Chet erton, Eq. ; Eduard
Archer, of Treslake, Esq. ; Samuel Thomas Spry, of Place,

DERBYSHIRE.—SamueI Shore, of Norton, Esq. ; Richard Ark_
Wright, the younger, of Sutton-cum-Duckmanton, Esq. ;
George Benson Strutt, of Belper, Esq.
DrvoNsiitaE.—Alexander Hamilton Hamilton, of the Retreat,
Esq. ; John North Woollcombe, of Ashbury, Esq. ; John

Quick, of Newton House, Esq.
DORSETSHIRI3.—George Thompson Jacob, of Weymouth, Eq.
Sir Edward Baker Baker, of Ranston, Bart.; Richari

Brouncker, of Boveridge, Esq.
Essex.—John Thomas Selwyn, of Down-ball, in Hatfield Broad
Oak, Esq. ; Richard Birch Wolfe, of Wood-hall, in Arkgden,

Esq. ; Robert Cleere Ifaselfoot, of Boreham, EAq.
GLOUCF,STERSITIRE.—Robert Canning, of Hartpury, Esq. ; Henry
Elwes, of Coulesbourne, Eq. ; Josiah Gist, of Warmington.

Grange, Esq.
IIF.REFORDSHIRE.—Jo,,eph Blissett, of Lcttori Court, Esq.

John Freeman, of Gaines, Esq. ;Thomas Dunne, of Bircher,

Esq.
lIEUTFORDSUIRF..—Robert Plummer Ward, of Gilitone Park,
Eq. ; John Calvert, of Albury, Esq. ; George Jacob Bogan.

quet, of Broxbourne Bury, Esq.
KENT.—George Douglas, of Chilston Park, Esq. ; Frederick
Edward Morrice, of Betshanger, Esq. ; John Carruthers, of
Mitchells, Esq.
LEICESTERSIIIIM—CharIesNeviIIe, of Holt, Esq. ; John Mans-
field, of Birstall, Esq. ; Edward Bourchier Hartopp, of Little
Dalby, Esq.
LINCOLNSHIRE.—WiIIiam Hutton, of Gateburton, Eq.; Henry
Dymoke, of Scrivelsby-court, Esq. ; Henry Handley, of Cul-
verthorpe-house, Esq.

MONMOUTINIIIRE.—WiIIiam Vaughan, of Courtfield, Esq. ; Sir
Mark Wood, of flumney, Bart. ; John Buckle, of Wye Lands,
Esq.

NORFOLK.—Sir William Beauchamp Proctor, of Langley, B,art.
Wm. Lyde Wiggett Chute, of Pickenham, Esq. ; Bober'
Marsham, of Stratton Strawless, Esq.

NORTHAMPTONSHIRE.—The Hon. Philip Sidney Pierrepoint, of
Evenly-hall ; Win. Williams Hope, of Rushton, Esq. ; Wm.
R. Rose, of Chapel-Brampton, Esq.

NORTHUMBERLAND.—WITI. ROddaTil, Of ROddaM, Esq. ; Sir Ed.

ward Blackett, of Matten, Bart.; Henry John Wiluarn

lingwood, of Lilburn Tower, Esq.
NOTTINGHAMSHIRE.—Sir Thomas Wollaston White, of Walling.
wells, Bart. ; Henry Machin, of Gateford-hill, Esq. ; Slings.

by Duncome, of Langford, Esq.
OXPORDSHIRE.—Edward Simeon, of Whitechurch, Esq. ;
Michael Henry Blount, of Maple-Durham, Esq. ; Wm.
Francis Lowndes Stone, of Brightwell-park, Esq.
RUILANDSIIIRE.—WiIIiam Ward, of Belton, Esq. ; William
Gifford, of North Luffenharn, Esq. ; John Muzloe Wing-

field, of Market Overton, Esq.
SHROPSHIRE.—WaIter Moseley, of Buildwas, Esq. ; Wm. Oak-
ley, of Oakley, Esq. ; Sir John Hanmer, of Bettesfield, Bart.
SOMERSETSIIIRE.—Sir Henry Strachy, of Sutton.court, Bart. ;
George Henry Carew, of Crowcome-court, Esq. ; Francis

Popham, of West Begborough, Esq.
STAFFORDSHIRE.—Thomas Kinneraley, of Clough hall, Esq. ;
Sir Thomas Fletcher Fenton Boughey, of Aqualate, Bart. ;
Hugh Henshall Williamson, of Greenway.bank, Esq.
COUNTY OF SOUTHAMPTON.—James Winter Scott, of Rother.
field park, Esq. ; George Player, of Ryde.house, in the Isle of

Wight, Esq. ; Jervoise Clark Jervoise, of Idsworth.park, Esq.
SUFFOLK.—John Gurdon, of Assington, Esq. ; Edward Fuller,
of Carlton Rode, Esq. ; Jo:eph Burch Smith, of Stoke-hall,
Ipswich, Esq.
SC2REY.—MiIes Stringer, of Effingham, Esq. ; Sir Henry
Fletcher, of Ashley park, Bart. ; George Thomas Nicholson,
of Ham, Esq.

SUSSEX.—Alexander Donovan, of Framfield-park, Esq. ; Henry
Jackson, of Hartfield, Esq. ; Augustus Elliott Fuller, of
Ashdown, Esq.

WAawicKsinuE.--Edward Sheldon, of Bailer, Esq. ; Sir Francis
Shuckburgh, of Shuckburgh-house, Bart. ; Edmund Meysey
Wigley Greswold, of Malvern hall, Esq.
WILTSHIRE.—Sir Edmund Antrobus, of Amesbury, Bart. ;
Wiliam Temple, of Bishopstrow, Esq. ; George Powlett
Scrape, of Castle-Combe, Esq.
WORCESTEASHIRE.—John Somerset Packington, of Westwood,
. Esq. ; John Joseph Martin, of Ham-court, Esq. ; John Brown,
of Lea-castle, Esq.

YORKSHIRE.—Riehard York, of WighilLpark, Esq. ; Sir Wm.
Pilkington, of Cbevet, Bart. ; William Constable Maxwell,
of Everingham, Esq.

COURT OF CHANCERY.-(THIS DAY.)

The LORD CHANCELLOR did not take his seat this
morning till eleven o'clock.
BRIDGMAN v. LEIGIL

The Court was occupied the whole morning with this appeal,
which was of no public importance, the principal question being
the right of the Hon. George Bridgeman, the Rector of Wigan,
to the tithes of certain lands in Lancashire.

ROLLS COURT.-(THIS DAY.)

LEWIS r. COLMER,

The arguments in this cause, which have already occupied
the Court several days, were resumed this morning, and had
not terminated whcn our reporter left. We shall reserve giv.
ing the facts in detail till his Honour the Master of the Rolls
gives judgment.

VICE-CHANCERY COURT.-(THIS DAY.)

His Honour the VICF—CHANCELLOR was occupied the
whole morning with causes possessing no questions, or contain.
ing any facts of the least interest to any person, with the excel:,
tion of the parties concerned.

COURT OF KING'S BENCH.-(TIIIS DAY.)

WALTERS v. SMITH.

This was an action brought by the plaintiff' to recover a
balance of an account for drugs supplied to the Royal Western
Hospital, of which establishment the defendant was a director.
It would be recollected that the Royal Western Hospital
turned out a complete failure, and several actions were after.
wards brought against the members of the Committee indi.
dually. In this case the plaintiff had supplied drugs to an
amount exceeding 40!. Upon the concern being broken up,
the plaintiff sued a Mr. Hunter, one of the Committee, and in
order to stop all further proceedings he paid a sum of
'204 I4s. 6d. ; afterwards the plaintiff brought the present action
against Mr. Smith, another member, for the balance of his ac-
count. The action was tried before Lord Tenterden, under
whose direction the plaintiff obtained a verdict. On a former
day Mr. Pollock obtained a rule calling on the defendant to
show cause why there should not be a new trial, on the ground
of a misdirection of the Jury by the Learned Judge.
Mr. RICHARDS, to-day, showed cause against the rule, and
contended that the plaintiff was not debarred from suing the de-
fendant, by the payment of the 204 odd by Mr. Hunter. The
Learned Counsel cited several cases in support of the plaintiff's
right to recover.
Mr. POLLOCK in support of the rule, contended that the pay-
ment by Mr. Hunter was, in fact, a compromise of the whole
debt, and was a bar to any further demand by the plaintiff:
Their LORDSHIPS were of opinion that the plaintiff, al-
though he was paid a part of his demand by one of the direc-
tors, was entitled to sue another for the balance.
The rule for a new trial was, therefore, discharged.

petty he had, he said he had 1,6001. or 1,7001. in the funds. He
admitted that he had become bail for several persons during the
last and present terms. He was closely pressed about the pro-
perty in the funds, and he stated, that it was in the names of
two trustees, Mr. Johnson, clergyman of a parish adjoining Pet_
worth, in Sussex, and Mr. Ellis, an attorney of Petworth ; that
it was left to his wife, that he had received the dividends by a
power of attorney for thirty or forty years ; that his wife was
dead, and consequently it was now his property.
Mr. COMYN—Why you just said you assisted your wife to
work at the mangle, and it appears she is dead.—(Laughter.)
Somers—No, I did not say so; it is my housekeeper who
keeps the mangle.—(Laughter.)
To further questions he stated that he had not seen his trus-
tees for some years; he had not the power of attorney ; it was
in the hands ofhis trustees ; but he received the last half year's
dividend at the Bank.

His LORDSHIP said the bail did not give a very satisfactory
account of his property, and adjourned the case, to give an op-
portunity to make the necessary inquiries.

EXCHEQUER COURT.-(THIS DAY.)

Mr. Baron BAILED sat this morning till eleven o'clock for
the justification of bail. A full Court having then been made
Baron Bailey presiding in the absence of the Lord Chief
Justice?, two motions of no public interest were heard. Nothing
else being ready, their Lordships rose at hall.past eleven o'clock.

EXCHEQUER CHAMBER.-(THIS DAY.)

The LORD CHIEF BARON sat in this Court, and pro-
ceeded with the caw of " Small c. Attwood." The whole morn-
ing was occupied with the reading of evidence.

COMMON PLEAS.-(THIS DAY.)

ELTON r. LARKINS.

The Court was occupied the whole of the morning in hearing
Mr. Sergeant Wilde shew cause against a rule obtained by Mr.
Sergeant Spankie, for a new trial in this case which was tried in
London, and a verdict given for the plaintiff.
It was an action upon a policy of insurance, effected by a
broker named Bowman, for the plaintiff with the defendant, an
underwriter, upon the cargo and ship Fanny, of which the
plaintiff is owner, on her voyage from Cadix to London, and of
which no tidings were ever heard, consequently the plaintiff'
came upon the underwriters for the amount of the vessel and
cargo. The Court were induced to grant a rule for a new trial
in consequence of Mr. Serjeant Spankie showing that certain
letters and other correspondence had been kept back from
the underwriters at the time the insurance was effected, which,
had they been produced, would have been very material to the
insurers, inasmuch as that had they been in possession of the
information they contained they would have refused the policy.
Mr. Serjeant WILDE in a very able manner, argued that I
his client had acted in an upright and skilful manner in with-
holding the information the papers alluded to might afford, as
it was considered that the underwriters, from the many sources
they were in possession of at their place of business at Lloyd's
where information from every port in the world is forwarded,
might at any time ascertain upon reference, whether they were
acting right wrong. The Learned Serjeant was arguing the
point when our reporter left.

PRICKS OP Till! STOCKS DAY AT Mit O'CLOCK.
Bank Stock
:1 per Cent. Red. 813,004 India Stock -
3 per Cent.Conf. ... ...... 52.,!4;,.% Ditto Bonds 0 1 dis.
3 per Cent.
Ditto Red. 88%Y. Old Annuities...... ..... .... -
New 3%per Cent B9X 90% New Ditto •.... -
t per Cent Ann. 17:26 .... - 3 per Cent. Ann. 1751 .... -
4 per Cent. 1R26
Bank Long Ann to expire Ditto.. .500 5 7 pm
Jan 5, 18th - Ditto Small
Oct. 16, 1859 '0 7-16 % i Ditto Commercial
Jan 5, 1860 - Ditto Advertised
Jan. 5, 1880 - Bank for Opening ........, -
Aprils, 1880 lndia for Account
Jan. 5, 1870 - Cons. for N0v.24 82i4%

PRICES OF rt.KKION FUNDS THIS Dal' AT,NS :,-CLOCK.
4,,strian Bond.; Neapolitan —
13• A xilinn 130nd5 I4!Q Peruvian• Bonds
ne ,os Ayres Bond, — Portuguese Bonds —
C- iiian Eon:ls
oi:AaNari Honig
;lotto, itit24
Jewish 65!4.3.4 Spanish, 1821 13704
sireek Bonds _ -- --- 18/3 12.3 i
Jitto, !825

Exchange
dexican Bonds ......... 3 per cent
Jt 025
----- Exchange

FOREIGN EXCHANGES ON LONDON.
HAMBURG, Nov. 4.-13.8; two months. 13. 6%.
&roctutot.m,:Our. 28 —Ninety days, 13. 10.
Bassi EN, NOT. I.—Three months, 601.