The Sun.
London, England, 1849-06-29 00:00:00

THE SUN.

A NEW ELECTRIC TELEGRAPH

Science is always preparing some new wonder for
the world. The specification of the invention of a
remarkable " copying telegraph," to which we have
on previous occasions alluded, has just been enrolled,
and we are now enabled to describe the manner by
which this curious process is carried into opera-
tion. It is proposed by Mr. Bakewell, the inventor
Gf this telegraph, to make exact copies at a distant
town of an• written or printed characters which
_.........----..insTrozncov,-ona to

Are, sppl

ma _
do this of a rate far exceeding that by which the most
rapid penman can write. The message to be trans-
mitted is written with a pen dipped in varnish instead
of ink, and on tin foil instead of on paper. The tele-
graphic instrument consists of a train of wheels actu-
ated by a weight for the purpose of giving motion to a
cylinder whereon the message to he transmitted is
applied. A screw nut, which traverses on a screw
parallel to the cylinder, carries a metal point that
presses on the cylinder as it revolves, and is, by the
revolution of the screw, gradually moved from one
end to the other. The point is connected with the
wire from one end of a voltaic battery and the cylin-
der with the other end, after it has been extended to
the distant instrument; the electric circuit being
so arranged as to traverse from the battery to the
point, thence to the cylinder; from the cylinder
through the earth to the corresponding instrument,
and back through the main insulated wire to the
other pole of the battery. In this course the electri-
city passes from the point to the cylinder of each in•
strument, for they are both exactly alike. When the
point of the transmitting instrument rests on the
uncovered tin foil, the circuit is completed; but when
it rests on the varnish, which is a non-conductor of
electricity, the circuit is interrupted. The cylinder
of the receiving instrument is covered with paper
prepared with a mixture which electricity will de-
compose and make a mark; therefore, when the
point of the transmitting instrument rests on the tin-
foil, a mark is made on the paper of the other
instrument, and when passing over the varnish
letters, there is no mark on the paper. It is in this
manner that the point, by passing several fixes over
each letter in different parts, produces copies
of its form on the pager, the letters being
made by the discontinuance of the marking
where the electric circuit is interrupted. The
writing is thus seen of a pale colour on a blue
ground, the dark ground being formed of numerous
tine lines in those parts where the point touches
the tinfoil. Each line of writing passes under
the point six or seven times to bring out
the forms distinctly ; but as the cylinders may
be regulated to make thirty revolutions in a
minute, or even more if required, the pro-
cess is very rapid —so rapid, indeed, that
with a velocity of thirty revolutions in a minute, 400
letters of the alphabet, written in round hand, may
be copied in that short space of time ; and as the
instrument is capable of copying short-hand,
the rapidity of transmission would in that case be at
least quadrupled. This degree of rapidity is attain-
able with a single wire, and were two wires used, it
might be doubled, by having two points to copy with
instead of one.

It is evident that, as the points of the two instru-
ments have to pass several times over the same letters
to bring out their forms, it is essential that they
should move exactly together, and that the person in
charge of the receiving instrument should be able to
regulate it if there be a difference in
their respective movements. The inventor has
provided for this by employing electro -magnets to
brougbx P
‘,,,t,
relsolate each instrument.attha
ion by means of clock pendulums, in
The electromagnets are
tizt.Leach vibration the electro-
such a manner ghat
magnet attracts a heregulates the move-
Ruiz, or
tx oftener in each
12.1aztclkiT the
men t of the cylinder fothi9
revolution. There is also a
transmitting instrument, by the aid
the
pendulums of the two corresponding instrut,ut,„a
may
be adjusted to beat exactly together.
The invention comprises, in addition to the copy-
ing telegraph, a mode of breaking and renewing the
electric circuit at any station, so that the place re-
quired maybe put in communication, and no other. By
a modification of the arrangement, branch lines may be
brought into circuit and thrown out again, and thus
every station is under control, whether on the main
line, or on branches from it.

LONDON WEDNESDAY CONCERTS.
At the 27th, and " positively the last," of these enter-
tainments for the present season, Mr. Stammers went out
of his usual path, and abandoning the exclusively popular
style, courageously attempted the music of Mendalssohn
in Antigone. The excellent concert band of Mr. Willy
was largely reinforced for the occasion, a complete and
efficient body of profe-sional choristers were engaged,
and Mr. Sterndale Bennett was appointed conductor.
The result was in all respects gratifying. The execution
of the music was generally excellent, and the attention
of the audience undiminished until the end. The over-
ture was played with great effect. The choruses that
excited most applause were the beautil al legend, Royal
Dense long lived in a tower" (in E minor), and the mag-
nificent hymn to Bacchus, " Fair Semele's highborn
son," the latter of which, sung with remarkable power
and decision, was loudly encored. The elaborate instru-
mental accompaniments in the two great scenes of
Antigone and Croon, with the intervening and respond-

ing choruses, were also most forcibly executed. Mr.
SLerndale Bennett conducted throughout with the utmost
point and clearness, and there was scarcely one instance
of hesitation or uncertainty is the musical accompani-
ments to the dialogues and soliloquies. Mr. Bartholo-
mew's translation of the German version of Sophocles'
play, with a few unimportant abbreviations and omissions,
was recited by the following ladies and gentlemen :
Mr. Vandenhoff (Creon), Miss Vandenhoff (Antigone),
Miss Huddart (Ismene), Mr. Stuart (Tiresias), Mr.
Lloyd (Hasmon), Mr. George Bennett (Phocion), and
Mr. Smythson (chorus-speaker), who all zealously exerted
themselves to give the utmost force to the text, and by
helping the audience to enter more completely into the
meaning of the music, enable them to enjoy its beauties
with the greater zest. The applause at the end
of Antigone was loud and general. The se-
cond part of the concert, beginning with the over-
ture to Guillaume Tell, the last movement of which was
repeated, and ended with the national anthem, offered
little to differ from the usual character of these perform-
ances. The principal and most interesting feature was
a selection from Spohr's Faust, consisting of the air,
•' Liebe ist die zarte Bluthe," expressively sung by
Pischek, the grand recitative and aria, "Die stifle
Nsch'," by Miss Lucombe, and the fine scenes of Mephis-
topheles, " Stifle noch dies Wulh-verlangen," superaly
sung by Hcrr Formes, who made his first appearance at
these concerts, and experienced a hearty ,reception.
A fragment of the celebrated trio from Guillaume Tell,
by Mr. Sims Reeves, Herr Pischek, and Herr Formes,
was also a highly effective performance; and a very
agreeable sea song, "The Mariner," composed by Mr.
Hogarth, to some verses of Allen Cunningham, which
Mr. Sims Reeves gave with great spirit, was loudly ap-
plauded. Miss Poole sang several of her popular
ballads in her own quiet and attractive style; Mrs. A.
Newton, cleverly accompanied by Mr. Carte in the flute
obligato, was deservedly well received in " Lo here the
gentle lark;" and Mademoiselle Jetty Treffz was, as
usual, obliged to sing "Cumin' thro' the rye" twice
over, by general request. The only instrumental solo
performance was a tarantella by Dohler, for pianoforte
and violin, which was brilliantly executed by Miss Ellen
Day and her brother, Mr. John Day. The concert was
rather shorter tha❑ usual, and the miscellaneous part
was all the more grateful for its marked contrast with
the graver and more substantial entertainment that pre-
ceded it.

LAW INTELLIGENCE.
COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH, June 28.
;Sittings at Nisi Prins, before Lord DENMAN and a
Special Jury.)
PRATT V. BANBURY. .
....

This was an action of trespass brought against Mr.
Hanbury, as representative of the well-known firm of
Truman, Hanbury, and Buxton, for compensation in
damages for a malicious prosecution. It appeared
that on the i tth September, 1847, two draymen, named
Press and Shepherd, were employed to take two de-
liveries of beer to two customers, and as they were
loading the drays Shepherd, at the request of Press,
rolled a kilderkin of ale on the dray, besides the quan-
tity they had orders to deliver. When they had made
tne two deliveries Press proceeded to Mr. Pratt's public-
house, the evown and Anchor, and there left the kilderkin
of ale. This took place on a Saturday and on the
Monday evening following Shepherd communicated the
transaction to Mr. Hanbury and Sir Edward Bux-
ton. Mr. Cooke, a confidential clerk of the firm,
was then sent to Mr. Pratt's to make inquiries
and saw the kilderkin of ale in the passage. He then
returned to the brewery, and afterwards went back to
Pratt's house with Mr. Mart., a storehouse clerk, and a
Mr. Gow, and they took away the kilderkia of ale
without any objection on the part of Mr. Pratt. Mr. Pratt
was taken in;o custody, and Pratt and Press were both
tried at the Old Bailey on a charge of felony, and ac-
quitted. The Recorder, who tried the case, allowed the
expenses of the prosecution, and said it was a very
proper inquiry, for Messrs. Truman, Hnnbury, and Co.
would have an opportunity of knowing the careless
manner in which their clerks did their business.
Mr. JAMES, who, with Mr. Hawkins, appeared for the
plaintiff, opened the case.
A witness was called to prove the charge of felony;
and King, the servant of Pratt, who proved what took
place on the 11th September, when the kilderkin of ale
was left with Pratt.

Sir F. THESIGEa (with whom was Mr. Warren) ad-
dressed the jury for the defence. He contended that the
circumstances of the case were sufficiently suspicious to
justify Mr. Hanbury in making the charge against Pratt.
Shepherd, the drayman, Mr. Cooke, the clerk, Mr.
Msrr, a storehouse clerk, and Mr. Lucy, the loading
clerk, were then called for the defence.
Mr. JAMES then called John Press, whose evidence did
not differ in any material point from that of the other
witnesses.
Sir F. THESIGER then briefly observed on Press's
evidence.
Mr. JAMES replied. He said there was no evidence
to show that Mr. Pratt had received the goods knowing
them to be stolen. The transaction on the part of Pratt
was perfectly fair. The kilderkin was left in the pas-
sage where every one could see it. The conduct of the
firm had been quite unwarranted by the facts of the
case.
Lord DENMAN summed up, and in answer to the
questions which his Lordship put to them, the jury were
of opinion that Press was guilty of felony, and that Pratt
received the kilderkin of ale, knowing it to be stolen.
The verdict was, therefore, for the defendants.

SHERIFFS' COURT, June 28.
(Before Mr. Under-Sheriff BURCHELL.)
FALCHE V. BELLIS.--FALSE IMPRISONMENT.
The plaintiff in this action is an importer of foreign
china, &c., and carries on an extensive business in Ox-
tAxe ooroto of tat.
Paul's Church, St. John's-wood, residing at Dorchester-
place, Blandford-square. Defendant suffered judgment
to go by default.
Mr. GREAVES appeared for the plaintiff, and stated
the cage, from which it appeared that in February last
plaintiff was requested to make inquiries respecting a
Count de Toires or Conditores, and having been told
that defendant could give him some information, plain-
tiff waited on him at his house, and sent up his card,
thinking at the moment that it was his own, but it sub-
sequently proved to be one he had had given to him
of a gentleman named Williams, residing at Islington.
Some conversation led to the impression on defendant's
mind that the card was used for some improper purpose,
and that plaintiff was not at all acquainted with the per-
son of whom he inquired, and therefore sent for a police
man and gave him into custody, not giving credence to
his explat ations. On plaintiff being taken before Mr.
Broughton the respectability of the plaintiff was estab-
lished, and the magistrate suggested an apology and a
contributi:m to the poor-box, but defendant would not
accede, and the plaintiff had therefore felt it incumbent
upon him to bring the case before the jury.
He (the Learned Counsel) was, however, now
happy to say that the defendant being fully
convinced of his error, had offered a most ample
apology; and as the plaintiff's object was solely to ob
tain a public vindication of his character, ho had agreed,
on an apology being publicly made, to take a verdict for
nominal damages.
Mr. L3ARSTOW, for defendant, admitted that the
defendant had involuntarily fallen into an error, and
having satisfied himself, felt pleasure in doing justice to
the plaintiff by admitting it. The Learned Counsel
read the apology, and a verdict was entered for 40s.
and costs.
ARMSTRONG V. WALHER,.—BREACII OF PATENT.

The plaintiff in this action is a farmer, &c., at Ampt-
bill, Bedfordshire, and brought his action to recover
damages for a breach of patent for the construction of
harrows.
Defendant suffered judgment to go by default. De-
fendant had not only infringed on the patent, but had
written to the Stamford Mercury, stating that plaintiff
had no patent, and that the invention was entirely his
(defendant's) own. He had, however, afterwards said
that he had made forty harrows, and was willing to give
ss. each for making. This was refused.
The Counsel for the plaintiff said that he would be
content to take a verdict for 10!., without asking for spe-
cial damages.
The jury appeared to think that sum insufficient.
The UNDER-SHERIFF said the plaintiff consented to
take that sum, and that would, perhaps, satisfy the jury.
The verdict would, no doubt, stop any further infringe-
ment.

Verdict for plaintiff for 101.
BEDUCTION.—HARVEY V. CIIAPLIN.

This was an action to recover damages for seduction
of plaintiff's daughter. Defendant suffered judgment to
go by default.
Mr. WORDSWORTH (with whom was Mr. Partridge)
stated the case for the plaintiff, who is a publican or beer-
shop keeper at Cheshunt, Herts. Defendant is a carrier
to and from that place. The facts were these:—Defen-
dant had been in the habit of using plaintiff's house for
nearly seven years. At the beginning of that period
plaintiff's daughter was a child, and now being under
21 years of age. In 1846 plaintiff's wife died, after
which defendant professed an ardent attachment to
plaintiff's daughter, and unequivocally declared his in-
tention to marry her. He thus obtained a still more
intimate footing in the family, and the greatest
confidence was placed in his honour—so much
so, that he frequently attended the bar, and
on one occasion was left with the unfortunate
subject of the action to conduct the business.
Defendant availed himself of the position in which he
riVu.n,,lnsemeedet t:rypTet/hfoedrwLemellahr
was placed; and in January, 1848, the plaintiff's daughter
became a mother, and the defendant had since wholly
uponins e
Learned Counsel
ctpromisehouant spe
looifnt,said
fot that marriage
ahteiwas
wabsi
wouldbchou
bound
dee
in fairness to tell 11.eVatat that might form a subject of
was one entirely to recover
Plaintiff
of
in the way of
a separate action.
damages sustained by the
allighter.
.duignhter.
his busines, by the loss of the Beryl
Evidence was then adduced. Ptah:ll4,d,
Elivabeth Harvey, proved that she was employ her
father's business, and that, having been seducf,d
byd.,
fendant, she was unable to attend to it as formerly, and
h Id been ill for some months in consequence of her ac-
couch men t.
Mr. Sharpe, a medical practitioner, gave evilence that
the witness was still in a debilitated state.
Mr. T. CHAMBERS andressed the jury for the defendant,
and contended thit taLilitirs had been improperly per-
mitted, and that the lowest amount of damages would be
sufficient, for the feelings of the plaintiff could not have
been outraged.
The jury gave damages, 40/.

MR. MACREADY.—BIRMINGFIAM, WEDNESDAY.
Mr. Macready appeared for the first time in England
since his return from Nor th America, at our theatre hat
night. The reception of Mr. Macready was most enthu-
siastic. The house was crowdfd. mai the wavi!,g of hats
and handkerchiefs greeted his appearance. Mrs. Warner
was the Lady Macbeth.

SOUTH WARK COUNTY COURT. I 1
(Barons G. CLIVE, Esq.)
LYON V. SHEPHERD, PROPRIETOR OF THE SURREY
THEATRE.
This was a second action brought by the plaintiff, a
tragedian, well known to the London hoards, against the
defendant, proprietor of the Surrey Theatre, to recover
the sum of' 101. for two weeks' salary.
Mr. Lewis, of Ely-place, attended for the plaintiff, and
Mr. Thomas, the barrister, accompanied by Mr. Solomon,
for the defendant.
The particulars relative to this case must be fresh in
the memory of our readers, as a full report appeared in
the newspapers on the 14th instant, when judgment was
given for the plaintiff. Plaintiff was desired to perform
Polonious in Hamlet, and other characters unsuited to
him, and contrary to his engagement, and on his refusal
he received a letter from defendant, discharging him on
those grounds. He being engaged specifically as a lead-
ing character for the season, summoned the defendant
for his salary, and on the last occasion his Honour gave
judgment in his favour. The present action was to re-
cover 10/. for two subsequent weeks' salary.
The court was crowded to suffocation with gentlemen
connected with the theatrical profession, among whom
were called as witnesses Mr. Tilbury, of the Haymarket;
Mr. Charles Freer, Mr. Cornelius Granby, Mr. Emery,
Mr. Widdicombe, Mr. Johnson, and Mr. John Dale, who
gave evidence for the plaintiff.
Mr. THOMAS contended that his client was not in-
debted, as there were rules connected with the theatre
which gave the proprietor an opportunity of discharging
an actor. The rules were printed, and prominently
placed in the green-room and in various parts of the
theatre. Rule 1 set forth " that each had the power of
giving and taking a week's notice, unless otherwise
specified." There was no special engagement with the
plaintiff; consequently, his client was right in discharg-
ing him with one week's notice. The 3d rule stated
" that if any performer refused to take his part when
assigned to him he should be discharged." Now, Mr.
Lyon had been requested to perform characters of the
utmost importance, and on his refusal he was dismissed.
He called
Mr. Shepherd, who stated that no special engagement
was entered into between them, and the plaintiff was
amenable to the rules. When he employed Mr. Ander-
son to perform Hamlet, be requested the plaintiff to
take the part of Polonius, which he refused to do, al-
though he had performed " old men" and a number of
second-rate characters in that theatre. He consequently
gave him a week's notice, and discharged him. He con-
tended that there was no regular season at the Surrey
Theatre, and that the plaintiff was not engaged for any
specific term.
Mr. Emery was next called by defendant, and, in an-
swer to Mr. Thomas, he said he was stage manager of
the Surrey Theatre, and had performed second-rate cha-
racters with Mr. Lyon. It was customary at that theatre
to give and take a week's notice, unless specially en-
gaged in writing.
In cross-examination by Mr. LEWIS, witness said he
did not consider himself bound by the rules as he was
engaged from Christmas, 1848. to 1849. If he was
engaged for the season, he should consider the rules not
binding on him, and that a week's notice could not be
given. As. ason was, in fact, an indefinite period.
Mr. LEWIS having addressed the Judge at some length
on behalf of the plaintiff,
His HONOUR called Mr. Widdicombe, jun., who stated
he was with Mr. Lyon when be made the second en,
gagement with the defendant. He considered it was for
the season, and that a week's notice was not applicable
to him.

His HoNnun, in giving judgment, said that from Mr.
Lee's letter it was clear that the plaintiff was to have the
leading business, and not to be called upon to play
second; that, coupled with the evidence of Mr. Tilbury,
the actual Polonius of the Haymarket, and other wit-
nesses, was to his mind conclusive that the manager had
no right to call on the plaintiff to play that character, or
to cancel the agreement on account of his refusal to
comply. But a point had been made, which was not
raised in the first action, upon the construction of cer-
tain rules and regulations, under which the defendant
claims a right to discharge the plaintiff on giving him a
week's notice of his intention to do so. And here he
must state he was satisfied those rules and regulations
had been hung up in the green-room of the theatre
before Mr. Lyon's engagement, and that that gentleman
was cognisant of them, and also that he had duly received
a week's notice of his dismissal. If Mr. Lyon was en-
gaged for the season, the rules did not apply to him.
Was he engaged for the season? Mr. Widdicombe and
other witnesses gave evidence to that effect, and it was
clear that the new engagement was a continuance of the
old one, and that was for the season. Judgment must
therefore be given for the plaintiff; and he hoped some
arrangement would be entered into between the parties
to prevent such litigation. If either party still persisted,
he trusted some attempt would be made to try these
causes elsewhere.
Judgment was accordingly given for the plaintiff for
151. in the whole, and the cost of both suits.

IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT.

HOUSE OF LORDS, June 28.

Their Lordships assembled shortly after Five o'clock,
ILLNESS OF THE LORD CHANCELLOR.

Lord BROUGHAM, in moving that certain returns
be made from the Court of Chancery, declared that no
possible inconvenience had arisen, or could arise, from
the absence of the Lord Chancellor, and he hoped that
bis Noble and Learned Friend would not go out one dAy
sooner than he felt himself equal to do so. He remem-
bered that on one occasion Lord Eldon had been absent
for three months.

Lord LANGDALE could not agree in opinion with
his Noble and Learned Friend that no inconvenience
had arisen from the absence of the Lord Chancellor;
but he suggested that during the short absence of the
Lord Chancellor a commission might fat? issued to per-
form temporarily the functions of the Great Seal.
Lord CAMPBELL said that in former times nothing
was more common than for the Lord Chancellor during
his absence abroad, or during his indisposition, to hand
over the seal to a Vice-Chancellor who performed the
functions of his office.
The subject then dropped.
PETITIONS.

The Earl of GALLOWAY presented a petition from
Castle Douglas in favuur of granting sites for free
churches in Scotland. The Noble Earl also presented
several petitions against the Parliamentary Oaths Bill.
Lord REDESDALE presented a petition from the
Great Western Railway Company, praying that the
standing orders might be dispensed with in relation to
one of their Bills now before the House.
SI IES OF SCHOOLS BILL.
On the motion of Lord REDESDALE, this Bill was
read a first time.

PETITIONS.
The Earl of SUFFOLK presented several petitions
praying for the extension of the jurisdiction of the County
Courts.
Lord BROUGHAM had urged that the jurisdiction
of the courts should be extended to 501, but his Noble
and Learned Friend the Lord Chancellor had never
pledged himself to introduce any measure to that effect.
Lord STANLEY presented several petitions com-
plaining of agricultural distress; also some petitions
praying for a new system of rating,
The Duke of NEWCASTLE presented a petition
against any endowment to Roman Catholics.
HIGHWAYS ANNUAL RETURN BILL.
The Earl of GRANVILLE moved the third reading
of this Bill.
After a few words from the Earl of ST. GERMANS,
The Bill was read a third time and passed.
CANADA.

Lord BROUGHAM said that he had received a list of
79 addresses presented to the Governor-General asking
him to refuse assent to the Indemnification tor Losses Bill.
He wished to know if any list had been received by the
Government of these addresses?
Earl GREY had understood from the Governor-
General that several addresses had been resented, but
no return of them had been made.
FRENCH EXPEDITION TO ROME.
The Earl of ELLENBOROUCi LI asked if a copy of
the communication between the British Ambassador to
France and the French Government would be laid be-
fore the House, and if any subsequent communication
had been made to our Government, in consequence of
the changed character of the expedition.
The Marquis of LANSDOWNE said that no commu-
nication had taken place with regard to what the Noble
Esrl had desoribed as the changed character of the expe-
dition.

The Earl of ABERDEEN wished to observe that the
French Government had, in point of fact, made no com-
muincation whatever; they had merely ordered the Am-
bassador to read a communication to the French Minister
at Vienna. He wished to know whether the Government
would also communicate the dispatch which the Austrian
Minister had read.

The Marquis of LANSDOWNE said the communi-
cation from the Austrian Minister necessarily took place
verbally, whereas the French Minister was instructed
to leave a copy of the dispatch with Lord Palmerston,
consequently no record was left at the Foreign-office of
the Austrian dispatch.
The Earl of ABERDEEN said that the French
Ambassador was merely directed to read the dispatch,
whereas the Noble Marquis had said that he had had
in his hands the dispatch of the Austrian Minister;
therefore he thought that that dispatch might be
laid before Parliament. It was a mockery to say
that the French dispatch conveyed any intimation,
and he wished to know if the Austrian dispatch had
not been more explicit; and he asked if the Government
would not lay on the table the communication of the
Austrian Government, which he believed was much
more explicit.
The Marquis of LANSDOWNE said, from the obser-
vations of the Noble Earl, it might be inferred that the
communications of the Austrian and French Govern-
ments were similar ; the fact was, however, they
were totally dissimilar. The instructions of the Aus-
trian Government were not communicated in form; the
e
communicationsconversation.
aso f the
only
ltyh
charged
Frenchofd
the Gt o
communicatev
Fe rren
ceh t
owv ee rt en mmd
his
(ti
nn t
structions, but was specially authorised to leave a copy
of them. Consequently, in the one case there was a do-
cument upon record, while in the other there was not.
The Earl of ABERDEEN was sorry to be obliged to
correct the Noble Marquis; but the fact was, the French
Ambassador had been directed to read his instructions,
whereas the Austrian Minister had been directed to
leave a copy. The dispatch laid on the table was only
a copy of the dispatch which the French Ambassador
had been ordered to read. The Noble Marquis had said
he had read the dispatch of the Austrian Government; it
must, therefore, be in his possession—
The Marquis of LANSDOWNE was understood to
make a ge.t ere in the n-gat)ve.
thelhNeot-41eriofwould be able to obtain from the
MarquisAIEILDEEN said, perhapi in that case
Austrian Government the same permission as he had