The Sun.
London, England, 1849-01-15 00:00:00

TALLOW.

Our market is heavy tor all descriptions of Tallow.
owing chiefly to the large stock on hand, and prices
are 6d per cwt lower than on Monday last. P. Y. C. on
the 'pot is quoted at 41s 6d to 41s 3d•per cwt. Scarcely
any business is doing for forward delivery. Rough Fat,
2s 5d per 81b. Town Tallow, 42s to 43s 6d per cwt
net cash.

CHANCERY.—(THIS DAY.)
The Lord Chancellor sat in his Court in tho Old
Hall, Lincoln's Inn, to-day, and heard appeals.

STEWART V. FORBES.

The arguments in this part-heard appeal from the
decision of the Vice-Chancellor of England were com-
menced on Saturday, and the case stood again on the
paper to-day for the resuming of the arguments. The
question in the case, related to long and intricate ac-
counts between two large mercantile houses, one carrying
on business here and the other in the West Indies. The
ease was argued at considerable length before
the Vice-Chancellor of England, who, at the conclusion
of the arguments, stated his opinion to be that the case
must go to law, but the parties being anxious to obtain
the decision of his Honour, by the consent of all par-
ties, his Honour consented to give judgment in the case,
and took time for that purpose. Ultimately the Court-
gave judgment, dismissing the bill with costs; and from
that decision the plaintiff appealed to this branch of the
Court. On the case coming on on Saturday Mr.
Bethell, on behalf of the defendants, sub-
mitted that the plaintiff having consented to
take the judgment of the Court on the whole case
after the Vice-Chancellor had stated his impression to
be that the matter must go to law, was stopped from
bringing the present appeal; upon this point some con-
siderable argument took place on Saturday, and Mr.
Bethell was to have replied this morning, but
The LORD CHANCELLOR on taking his seat, stated
that he thought the objection of Mr. Bethell was a correct
one, that the defendant was bound by the consent he bad
given, and ordered the appeal petition to be dismissed,
with costs. It Mr. J. Parker thought he could sustain
the appeal on the ground that the matter ought to have
been decided without the intervention of a jury, he
would hear him upon that then or on some future day.
Mr. J. PARKER said his clients had always been of
opinion that the case should be decided without an issue.
Mr. BETHELL inquired whether Mr. Parker was pre-
pared to argue that question now, because if he was, he
should take a preliminary objection to his doing so.

Mr. J. PAniEn said lie .vas not, and the matter was
ordered to stand over for a few days.

ATTORNEY•GENERAL V. WILSON.

This case came before the Court upon appeal from
the decision of the Vice-Chancellor of England. Our
readers will doub.less recollect that some time since the
case was argued for a great many days before the Court
below, and the question involved in it is, what class of
Dissenters should have the preference in the management
of a charity established some centuries ego by Lady
Llewley. It having been decided in the case
of the " Attorney-General v. Shore," that the
Unitarians were not entitled to have the management
of:the charity; the English orthodox Dissenters, consist-
ing of the Iwiependents, the Congregationalists, and the
Baptists, claimed to be entitled, while the defendants,
the members of the Scotch Presbyterian Church, asserted
that they were the only parties who ought to have the
control of the charity. His Honour the Vice-Chan-
cellor of England decided in favour of the English or-
thodox Dissenters, and from that judgraentthe present
appeal was brought.
Th 9 arguments appear likely to occupy some consider-
able time.

ROLLS' COURT.-(THIS DAY.)

CORRAGIO v. LEE.

The further arguments in this petition were resumed
this morning. The case came before the Court on a
petition praying that the solicitor having the conduct of
this cause should cease to conduct it, and another be
appointed; also that the present receiver of the estate be
discharged. The petitioner is entitled to an annuity
arising out of the property which is the subject of the
cause " Sims v. Lee," and the petition was founded
upon an allegation that the property, consisting of two
farms, Tuberry Lodge Farm and the Warren Farm,
situated in Berkshire, were underlet at rents much be•
neath their value, and that Tuberry Lodge itself was
aad had always been a handsome manorial seat
until the present receiver let it to a country gen-
tleman (Mr. Morris), who keeps therein a pack of
fox•honnds, stowing away meal and corn in the
dining-room, and allowing the dogs to run through the
apartment and offices, whereby great injury has been
done to these estates, which are held of the Fellows and
Scholars of Magdalen Hall, at the University of Ox-
ford, for a term of twenty years, renewable from time
to time, on payment of a small fine, upon these condi-
'tons—that the several houses and buildings shall be
kept in good repair, the timber remain unlopped, and
that the premises shall not be underlet without the ex-
press permission of the Fellows and Scholars of Mag-
dalen Hall. The petition stated that these three condi-
tions had all been violated, and that the Bursar of the
College had in consequence threatened to vacate the
lease, and to turn the lessees out of the premises. The
petition further stated that the Bursae was about to take
a survey, on the part of the College, of both farms, with
a view to evict the lessees fur breaches of covenant; and
that, if such eviction took effect, the petitioner would
lose thR security for the payment of the annuity of 801.
during life.
The arguments were proceeding when our reporter left.