The Sun.
London, England, 1849-11-22 00:00:00

CORN AVERAGES.
GENERAL AVERAGE PRICES OF BRITISH CORNT
For the Week ended Nov. 15, ISO, made up front ski Returns of the
Inspectors in the different Cities and Towns in England and Wales
per Imperial Quarter.
I WIIXAT. EARLET.I OATS. 1 VII. f
DEANS.
PRICE .. I 404 6,1 28t 3d I 16s lid I 23s 7d' 29$ 7d 110 s 7d

DUTIES ON FOREIGN CORN.
sraskr. I BAILEY. I OATS. I SEAMS. TEAS.
IS Od 13 Od Is Od Is Od Is Od 18 Od

LAW INTELLIGENCE.

CHANCERY.—(THIS DAY.)
The. Lord Chancellor sat in hiS court in the Old Hall,
Lincoln's Inn. and t,sok motioo3, it being the Seal day.
His LORDSHIP having disposed of the part-heard ap-
peal " Oaslow v. Wallis," proceeded with the list of
appeal !notions, the greater portion of which were struck
out, in consequence of the alo,encm of counsel.
No case of the slightest interest came before the Court
during the morning.

ROLLS' COURT.--(THIS DAY.)
The MASTER OF THE. ROLLS, after disposing of the
motions that were brought before him, it being Seal
day, proceeded to hear the further argumpnts in the
par:-hard curse of " Blenkinsopp v. Blenkinsopp,"
which occupied the remainder of the day.

VICE-CHANCERY.—(THIS DAY.)
(Before the VICE-CIIANCELLOR of ENGLAND.)
This being Seal day, his Honour the Vice-Chancellor
of England heard motions.
The COURT having disposed of all the motions before
it, rose as early as eleven o'clock.
Nothing of any interest took place in the courts of
the Vice-Chancellory Knieit Brnci and Wigram.

COMMON PLEAS.—(THIS DAY.)
(Sittings in Banco.)
DANIELS AND ♦NOTHER V. REICHLfSER•

A rule nisi had been obtained in this case to show
cause why the appearance entered for the defendant and
all subsequent proceedings thereon should not be set
aside for irregularity, and why the plaintiff should not
pay the costs occasicrwd thereby, together with the costs
of the application. The application was grounded on an
affidavit of the defendant in which he said he was never
served with a copy of a writ in the action, but that, on
the contrary, another person, named Spiers, who was a
customer in his shop at the time, was served with it by
mistake.

Mr. STAMMERS Ras now heard against the rule. He
was furnished with several affidavits, which directly
contradicted the depositions of tho defendant. One of
them was made by the person who served the writ, and
who said that he could not have made any mistake about
the party, fur Spiers was a young man of fresh colour,
about 25 years of age, and the defendant a dark looking
man of middle age. _ _ _

The COURT, after hearing the affidavits read in detail,
maid they were of opinion that the rule ought to be made
absolute.—Rule absolute accordingly.

EXCHEQUER.-(THIS DAY.)
(Sittings in Banco.)
.. _ MORRISON AND OTHERS V. GLOYEIt.

This was an argument upon a demurrer to the decla-
ration, and also upon a cross-demurrer to three of the
pleas, raising several questions for the opinion of the
Court upon the construction of three Acts of Parliament
having reference to the regulation of benefit building
societies. The principal question, however, in the case
was to ascertain whether upon the statutes, as one of
them specially provides that all matters in dispute be-
tween the trustees of the society and the members
should be referred to arbitration, the trustees are
!evertheleis at liberty to bring an action for any matter
in dispute.
The case was part heard yesterday, when the Court
gave an unanimous judgment fur the plaintiff on all the
points except one, which formed the subject of a judg-
ment delivered this morning by the Lord Chief Baron
upon the question of the right of the plaintiff to sue in
an action at law.
The LORD CYIEF BAR,N, in giving his judgment,
affirmed generally the right of the trust-ees to sue, and
therefore there was judgment for the plaintiff on both
demurrers.

BAIL COURT.-(THIS DAY.)
(Before Mr. Justice EALE.)
Mr. Justice Erie presided in the Bail Court to-day,
but no case came before him calling for a detailed report.
Mr. ADDISON obtained two rules against the Directors,
and Mr. Newton, the solicitor of the York, Newcastle,
and Berwick Railway Company, calling upon them to
show cause why they refused to deliver up the submis •
sions to refer to in two instances of compensation de.
mended and awarded under the Lands' Clau►es Cox
aolidation Act. The object of obtaining possession of
the documents was to have them made rules of court, so
that the successful parties in the dispute, who were the
present applicants, might have their costs taxed by a
master, and the payment of them enforced.