The Sun.
London, England, 1814-07-20 00:00:00

BANKRUPTS.

dervas Cole.BrOwn, Leieester, ho'sier, to surrender July. 30,,
August 1, and 30, at eleven, at the Bull's Head Inn;
Hinckley- Leicestershire. Attorney, Messrs. Jervis, King,
and Soden, Hinckley.
Jaines Cooksey, West Broomwich, Staffordshire, nail-iron-
mongers, July 26, August 2, and 30, at eleven, at Guild-
hall. Attorney,, Mr. Harrison, Lambeth-road.
Richard Cross, late of- Hewcl4field, Gloacestershire, carpen-
tei:, Anglist 1, 24,and 30,.at eleven, at the Talbot lint,
Bristol. -Attornies, My. T. Brace, Surrey-street, Stra»d,
or Stokes, Caerment.
R. and S. Tibloutt, Leicester, kooksellers,. July 43, 26, and
AngtiSt 30,
.at Guildhall. Attorney, 1.9 r. Birkett, Cloali-
.• lane. . . _

J..Needhatn, Hope, Derbyshire, cotton-spinner, August 8,9,
and 30, at eleven, at• the MosLy Arms Inn, Manches-
ter. Attornies, Mr. Jeremiah Buelacy, Manchester, or
Messes. Shepherd, Adlington, a'nd Gregory, Bdford-row.
it, Barnard; Boston and Skirbeek; Lincolnshire, hanker,
August 11, 12,-and 30, at eleven, at. the White Hart
Inn, Boston. Attornies, Mr. Holloway, or Mr. Rodgerson,
,lloston, Lincolnshire, or Messrs. Ex.Jey, Stocker, and Daw-
' -son .Furnivars-Ion: •
J. Bedl cell, Ingiam-court, Fenchuech-street, ship-broker,
July 23, 9.6, and August 30, at ten, at Guildhall. Attor.4
nies, Messrs. Gatty and Haddan, Angel-couit, Throginor-
ton-street.' • . . _ . „
. < •

-- ---- . <
J. Rees, Princes-street, ravendish-square, paper-hanger,
July 26,, August 2, aid, 30, at ten, at tiuildhall. Attorney?
J. Stanton, New-road, Tottenhanticourt,;94d,
Mr. Upstone Charles,strAecu.t3.,uNsitid2d,lesaenxd 118(0);:pital, •
Middlesex,
Norwich, liquor-merchant, july2s, at
,tw -lye, at
stone
-Plaalru.:ll3tto'rlyne2l,, Mr. Shuter,'Milbank-street,
tVest-
minster. ' . ..
30, at four, at the Castle I 29, and August
.nn St. Peter Ma AtLor-
S. Barker,
isles, Messrs. Longdill and Butterfield, H.inorn-court. '
MI- Lyon, Poibt-street, Portsmouth, slopseller, -lug,:st 2, at
one, 3, at eleven, and 30, at one, at the In6ia A,ms, (ca-
port.
.4ttornirs, Mr. J. A. Johnston, Si. tieorge',-scinar4,
Poytsca, or Mr. Ledwielt, Col!ege-hill„ Upper "Phames-'
street. _ . . .

I. oainpet;Gun-dock, Wapping, barge-ma3tcr, July 23;30,
and Augu4 30, at twelve, at Gnililintli. Attorney; Mr.
Hatton, Deasi-street, To-ley-street, Santi,:wark.
S. Barnard,
Biiston, Linealitshireonerciimit, August 2,9, and
30,-4 one, atauildhall. Atturnieis, Messrs. Kearsey and
Spurr, Ilistiopsgate-street.
victnaller, July 23, and
Au 2; 11 st aid SO, at twelve, at Cinildhall.
Vanderemn and Ciiniyn, Caunu •-street.
A. .July' -29, 3U, anti
August 3u, at ten, at the Lawn 'ins, '4 ailinglord. A toils
flies, ji,ssi,s. •Fle(igos and Sat, Witlitn4ford,
Price and Williams,
[Dividends, Scin To-murrow.l •

1111 PER EA L PA R I.IAMEN T.

HOUSE OF LORDS, fivprmy, Jpi.v 19:

• MISCELLANV.ntt'S..
• .In a•rranmittee of Prisileges, Counsel were faither heard
teseeeting the claims of the Borthwick Peerage.--,Deferred
- till this day. se'unight.
A considerable nmollero Petitions were presented on the
subject of the African Slave Thee, by his Highness the Duke
of GeottetsTr.a„Earls SeEscErt, RosittLyNyaadother Peers.—
Ordered IC) lis on the table. -7
Earl STANHOPE presented a Petition front certain Grow-
ers of Corn, which-he said was respectably signed: and de-
'sc ibed the object of it to be An, a speedy consideration of the
subject referred to inbis tesohition 'before their Lordships,
respecting the adoption of measures for the doe encourage-
tomit of Agriculture,, by abolition of certain burthensome
'taxes, ' • •
The Earl of HABDWICKE deprecated any prematute
this-
tussion of the subject to which the Noble Earl referred; and
mowed 't hat the consideration of the subject be deferred
loan-
' other Session.
Earl STANHOPE. spoke in explanation, and moved that the
Petition do lie on the table.
The LORDCHAN(:ELLOR thought that the point before
their Lordships 'was one'Of considerable impottance. The
petition Was presented in reference to a notice of„ a motion,
.Ited it was a serious question, elkether a petition could be re-
ceived upon the ground ofa notice for a motion?.
The Earl of HARDWICKE was of opiniii that' the pet)-
a
tion was clearly:suggested by the reiolUtieu of the Noble
Lord.
. . , .
After some 'further consideration upon' the point between
the above-Mentioned Peers and the Earl of Lauderdale, it was
44;,:reed that the discussion should be deferred till to-motrow.
Earl STANHOPE said ,he had another Petition to present,
which, though upon a different subject, was one of great ins-
,portance: Being-read, it appeared to be front a Mrs. Mary
-Tana-ell, complaining of her premises being forcibly cntet*l
by three Revenue Otlieers, op an information .that sh'e. Nazi
Yre•nch glbyes hr lier posFession,- whets, in fact, no contraband
articles whatever were foninl—that the damages we're laid at
soot. She was acquitted by.the Jury, but the' expence at-
teltding the process was considerable, &c. The:Noble Earl
I••.'as of opinion, the allegation's were worthy the, serious cqn,
tideration of the House, with reference to the existing system
•of the Excise Lawi, and moved that the Petition do lie ()tithe
Table.—Ordered. „ • • . . -
The Woollen Burying Bill passed through a Committee of
the whole Htruse, and was reported. •
linarounnittec on- the Northern Lights Bill some discussion
look place. In the result, it was ordered that the further
consideration of the subject should be deferred tilt to,morrow.
THE VRINCESS CHARLOTTE OF WALES. • .

The Duke of SUSSEX.—." My Lords, I confess
.5 rise with a considerable. degree, of embarrass-,
Itient, not unmixed with a certain • degree of
,aniety,- on the. very ;important and interesting
tl,ecasion on which I am about to address you.—
On these, -hovtever, I shall not detain your Lord-
ships, further than the expression of my hope,
that the Noble ',old opposite' Will satisfactorily
answer those questions which I think it my duty,
:tinder the circumstances of the case, to put to the
Noble Lord. I confess, my Lords; that in put-
ting those questions, my wish is to be considered
as doing it perfectly distinct and separate from
any party questiou whatever 3 that I do it purely
from my ovhl feelings of duty, .and unauthorised
,by any indivicfnalwhiitever. The questions in one
. sense; lam aware, is put' under very awkward
circumstances, though relative to an event known
- to most of the Noble Lords who hear me, and re-
specting which I may not coneur'in opinion with
other persons who have been consulted, but foV
whose conduct I entertain every possible respect.
I hope, my Lords, 1 may be allowed` to put the
folimving questions—but if any Nr;ble Lord feels
any difficulty in try putting them now,, I am ready *1
to reserve them for anti opportunity that,may arise
Order." - •

After a short pause; his Royal Highness pro-
ceeded-
-1 wish to know, from the Noble Lord, in the-
first instance, whether, since the removal of her
Royal Highness the Princess Charlotte of Wales,
to Carlton House, her Royal Highness has bad
that degree. of communication with her friends
end connections, which her Royal Highness bad
previous to her leaving Warwick House?"
After a another pause—" If the Noble Lord does,
riot choose to answer this que?tion,.l Shall, of
course know. bow to take it.—But I again ask
the Noble Lord, if her Royal Highness the Prin-
cess Charlotte has had the same degree of com-
munication with her friends and connections,
_since her removal to Carlton House, that she bad
while she remained arWarwick House ?
next wish to ask the Noble Lord, if her ROyal
Highness the Princess Charlotte of Wales, since
her removal to Carlton House, has had tlit
li-
berty of communication in writing and 4.letter
—of receiving and sending letters—and the use of
pens, ink, and paper—that she bad while at War-
wick House i •

"I have next to ask, whether her Rovul High-
ness the Princess Charlotte of Wales is, since her
residence at. Carlton House, in that state of li-
berty which persons considered not as in confine-
ment ought.to be in ?
"The fourth queition I have to ask is, whe-
ther, in the course of last year, her Royal
*less the Princess:Charlotte of Wales was not re-
commended, as proper for the state of her health,
the use of the. sea bath ; and, whether it is not
understood that the same has been recommended
to her Royal Highness this year ?
" The fifth question, my. Lords.is, whether her
Royal Highness the Princess Charlotte of Wales,
having arrived at the age oreighteen years and a
half, past the period when Parliament has fre-
quently recognised the capacity of persons of the
Royal Pathily to assume t4,e
,government df the
country without assistance; whether there is any
intention fur providing an establishment °suitable
Mr her Royal Highnes4, 'and 'proper for her to
lire and appear according to her due rank in that
society, over which, I hope, it will be her lot one
day to reign ?"

The Earl of LlNTEnroot:.---" My Lords, it is
Perhaps my duty to apOlogize to your Lordships
fur even making, any observations upo...i the ques-
tions put by the ilinitrious Duke. There .can
exist no doubt, my Lords;.in many cases, that• ad-
vaiages may result in puitting questions upon sub-
jects of great public importance, of great political
and national moment, to the; Ministers of the
Crown. But I leave it to your. Lordships to feel
fau4 to consider whether upon 'a
subject of the pe-
Culiar nature of the present, the questions put are
questions which ought to he an3wercd ? Upon
your judgments, and uponyour feelings, I will
most willingly And freely rest the decision.—
(Hear, hear, hear)-11.4 Lords, the Prince Re-
gent,'as actinein he.11:1111e and On the behalf of
Iris MilieStV, is, the ,Father of the Royal
and he has the exclusive right to regulate the edu-
cation not only of his own children, but of the

other ebilaren of the AnyAi Family; if there iveee
hear !)-1 ask, lily Lords, what in.
stance is .t here Of Parliament havin,, interfered in
a proceeding; a this nature ?. yVithout eluding
into possible or extreme cases,. I wish th.know,
my Lords; what ground the illastrious:Dnke has
laid for any Parliamentary inteffetence or proceed-
ing upon this case, or that should induce us to
• concur in ,any-?—(1-lear, hear, -hear am sure,-
my LoFds, that in:-:the—exereise of his legitimate,
right, the Prince Regent has, adopted no regula-
tion with respect to the Prineess Charlotte, that'
has not for its object, and for its clew, her Royal
-Highness's own benefit, interest, and advantage'
and that his feelings towArds her are purely those
• of a Sovereign and a Father ; feelings and duties
which are notonty imposed upon him by the laws
of the country, hut impressed .npon him by nature.
And I trust your
.Lordships will believe, when
you,come to consider, thainnder circumstanCes like
the present, the Great Person to whom I may al-
lude, Would be very far from concurring himself in
any-act with respect to • the Illustrious Persc;nage.
in question, but upon the fullest sense of its con-
tributing to her happiness, her comfort, and her
honour !--(hear, hear !)—And I think, my -Lord,
I should not discharge my-own duty, or consult
my own feelings'or the sense and feelings of the
flouse, if I add another word mote."
The Duke of Su SSEX disclaimed, in what he bad
said,,the least idea of, expressing any- thing dis- •
respectful towards the Illustrious Pcrson alluded-
'to. But as he was not satisfied with what had
Wien from the Noble Lord,' he fele it his duty-to,
give. notice; that-On Frid4 next, he should make
a motion on.the subject. Ills Royal l-lighness
then moved, that the- 'Lords be sunniloned for
Friday next.

The LORD CHANCELLOR said, be could not re-
main silent upon this cyJcasiori..• The 11IustriOlis
Duke had said, he meant riot to say any thing dis-
respectful towards the Great Person alluded to.—
He was persuaded his Royal flightless ...did not.
But he must take the liberty of saying, that ii- his
Noble Friend had answered the questions put to.
him, under the circumstances of, the case, he -could
not do so, tvithout being guilty of a breach of, his
dulyrin the opinion -of any man upon earth.- He
would have• betrayed his duty-to his Sovereign,
and he
.would tell his Noble Friend, that if he had
answered the first part of thesegitestions, he
(Lord E.) ‘vorild never have-tonversed again•with
him. What was meant by. the question, whether
the Illustrious Person referred to was allowed the
same sort of intercourse With her friend-Sand con.'
nections, (it might as well be said with • her ene-
mies), while liv under: the roof of her•
Father ? • Could thing; be said not to be an •impit
tation ? But •he must look upon, it • as; an ani-
madversion upon the Ministers of . the" Crown,
with reference to supposed advice• He Would
then only say, that the Great Person alluded to:
had the exclusive right to lirect.the education-of
his child, and that no man' had a right• tointer•
pose ; and a very strong ground indeed, must he
previously established, to warrant the interposition
of Parliament, with respect to advice so given and
followed. And with rthrence.to-the'whole of
conduct of theGreatTcrsonage alluded to, toWard3
the Illustrious Personage in question, he had the istacttorvot being able to state in the face of tint
eminery, that he, at least, was deserving of the
applause, and not the censure of mankind—(Hear!)
The Duke of SUSSEX shortly explained, that
whatever remarks he had madeonigfit be construed
into an animadversion upon the conduct of Mini-
sters upon the occasion ; but that he did not con-
ceive it possible to construe what he had said in
the way of disrespect towards the Great Person
alluded to.

Their Lordships were then, ordered to be stun
moiled for Friday.

- •
Viscount SIDNIOUTII gave wOtice of his intention to move
the second reading of the ,Irish Peace Preservation Bill on
Thursday, fur which day their Lordships were ordered to lie
summoned, on the motion of the Xuble'Secretary of State. • The remaining Bills upon :theVahle were then forwarded,
and tl►e House adjourned till to•morrow.

HOUSE OF COMMONS. •
• Several Petitions against the Slave Trade were presented,
which were ordered to lie on the Table.
The Cletgy Residence Bill and the East India Continuation
Bill Were read. a third time,,and passed. -
The Thames Police Bill was committed. Report to-morrow..
On 'the Motion of the CHANCELLOR of the EXCHE-
QUER; the House went into a Committee on the Duke of
Wellington's Grant. A Resolution was proposed and agreed;
to, that in ease of the failure of heirs male, the lands-of the
Noble Duke shoUld descend to his neNt female heirs.
POST OFFICE PACKETS.
Lord NUGENT rose, for the purpose he said, of
moving for some papers relative to an action which
took place on the 3d of November last, between
the Lady Mary Pelham and Montague packets,
and the, Globe, an American privateer. His Lord-
ship .contended that , Mr. Watkins, the Com-
mander of one of the packets,, did not merit the
rewards he received from the Post7l)ifice,in
consideration of his conduct, and that Mr. :Per-
ring, 'who commanded the other, had acquitted
him Self with the uttnoSt zeal 'and bravery ; this,
he. had no doubt, would appear, if the papers. re-.
lativei to this transaction were produced. 1-1 e
would therefore move, that there be laid upon' the
table copies of the Reports of the Courts of 'ln-
qUiry, together with the correspondence that took
place relative to an action fought off Madeira, on
,• the 3d of November last.
Mr. LusinNoroN was confident', that when 'the
papers were produced, the imprcsSion would be
different• to what is now on the mind of the NOble
Lord. It would then appear, that the Pelham did
not get. the assistance she was entitled to, and the
consequence was, that she was forced to throw
the packet overboard.. " •
.14ird NUGENT said, he did not mean to impute
any blame to Mr. Watkins, for throwing the mail
overboard.
Mr. PRESTON had no douht.htit it would ap-
pear, from the papers, that the conduct of Mr.
Perring.was highly honourable.
On the motion of -Sir E. BRIDGES, the Annual Produce
of the Revenue vested in the Misters of theßounty of Queen
Anne, together with the, ch!cuments relative, to this Bounty,
were ordered to be laid uponthe table.
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER moved, " That
the Report of the Spirit Intercourse Bill to betaken into-fur-
titer consideration.
,But Motions having precedence of Or-
ders, the SPEAKER said,. that the Hon. Gentlemen who had
given notice of MotionSovere now.at liberty to proceed with
them. ••

LORD COCHRANE._
Lord EBRINGTON said, he ruse to make the mo-
tie❑ of which he had given notice,; but before fie