The Sun.
London, England, 1822-06-19 00:00:00

THE ARMY.

The Egham Yeomanry Cavalry had the honour
of escorting his MAJESTY from his Cottage, in
Windsor Great Park, on Tuesday evening last.
His MAJESTY was pleased to express his appro-
bation of their soldier-like appearance.
On Monday last a troop of the 14th Light
Dragoons marched into Coventry. The other
four troops are to be stationed at Birmingham,
Nottingham, and Abergavenny.
The Cobham Yeomanry Cavalry are invited to
breakfast at Cobham Hall, Kent, on Wednesday
the 26th inst. On the Friday following, they
will assemble for exercise in the Park. On
Tuesday the 2d of July, they are invited to break-
fast at Rochester, with their respective Captains,
and on that and the day following, will exercise
with other troops on Chatham Lines.
Coax, JUNE 15.—This day the Imokilly
Yeomanry, under the command of the Marquis
of THOMOND, the Douglas Yeomanry, com-
manded by Lieutenant Newenham, and the
Riverstown Yeomanry, commanded by Captain
H. Townsend, were minutely inspected in the
exercise field, near the Barracks, by Major-Ge-
neral Sir John Lambert, in the presence of Major
General Sir John Elley. The Generals entered
the field about half-past one o'clock, and were
received with a general salute. They then passed
the line in front and rear, and on taking their
station in front of the line, the three corps broke
into open column, passed into ordinary time,
then passed in file, and forming again in open co-
lumn passed in quick time. They afterwards
advanced in line, and the inspection concluded
with a general salute. Sir John Lambert, having
called together the different Commanders of
Corps, was pleased to express his satisfaction at
their military appearance and state of discipline.
The fineness of the day, and the novelty of the
scene, attracted a great concourse of spectators.

From the LONDON GAZETTE of June 18.

Commission in the Renfrewshire Regiment of Militia, signed
by the Lord Lieutenant of the County of Renfrew.
Archibald Campbell, Esq. M.P. to be Colonel, vice Dun-
lop, deceased.

BANKRUPTCY SUPERSEDED.
N. Westron, Wellin on, Somersetshire, mercer.
BANKRUPTS.

T. S. and J. Beaumont, Leicester, bakers, to surrender, June
25, 26, and July 30, at eleven, at the Three Crowns, Leicester.
Attornies, Messrs. Lowdham and Greaves, Leicester; and Mr.
.eyes, Chancery-lane, London.
J. Ralfs, Freshwater, Isle of Wight, corn-dealer, July 2,3,
and 30, at one, at the Guildhall, Newport, Isle of Wight. At-
tornies, Messrs. Sewell and Hearn, Newport.
R. Henderson, Lowthian-Gill, Cumberland, corn-dealer,
June 28, 29, and July 30, at eleven, at the New Crown Inn,
Penrith. Attornies, Mr. Addison, Verulam-buildings, Lon-
don ; and Mr. Harrison, Penrith.
J. Lowry, Bunker's Hill, Cumberland, lead-ore-miner, June
26, 27, and July 30, at eleven, at the Lion and Lamb, Carlisle.
Attornies, Mr. (Mennen, Staple Inn, London ; and Messrs. S.
and G. Saul, Carlisle.

W. Peel, Bromyard, Herefordshire, builder, July 1,2, and
30, at eleven, at the Deer Inn, Worcestershire. Attor-
nies, Messrs. Williams and 'White, Lincoln's Inn, London ;
and Mr. W. Holdsworth, Worcester.
T. Chasey, East Pennard, Somersetshire, butcher, June 29,
July 4, and 30, at eleven, at the George Inn, Shepton-Mallet.
Attornies, Mr. R. 0. Burfoot, Inner Temple, London ; and
Mr. T. Higgins, Shepton-Mallet.
W. and T. Bolton, Banbury, Oxfordshire, coal-merchants,
June 28, 29, and July 30, at eleven, at the Red Lion Inn,
Banbury. Attornies, Messrs. Me rick and Broderip, Red
Lion-square, London ; and Mr. J. W. Golby, Banbury.
0. Lyall, North Shields, Northumberland, merchant, July
1, at eleven, at the George Inn, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, 18, and
30, at the Commercial Hotel, North Shields. Attornies, Mr.
Francis, Sun-court, Cornhill, London ; and Mr. Lowrey; North
Shields.

S. Abbott, Cumming-place, Pentonville, merchant, June 22,
29, and July 30, at ten, at the Court of Commissioners. At-
Comic-, Messrs. Bovill and Tustin, Bride-court, New Bridge-
street, Blackfriars.
DIVIDENDS.
Aug. 2. W. Hopwood, T. Hopwood, J. Ilopwood, jun.,
and J. Hopwood, Horwich, Lancashire, bleachers, at eleven,
at the Buck i'th' Vine Inn, Wigan, Lancashire—Aug. 2. F.
Taylor, Adlington, Lancashire, shopkeeper, at twelve, at the
Buck t'th' Vine Inn, Wigan--June 26. J. Knowles and H.
Walker, Salford, Lancashire, machine makers, at one, at the
Star Inn, Manchester—July 10. W. Woodcock, Preston, Lan-
cashire, timber merchant, at eleven, at the Bull Inn, Preston—
July 16. R. Hampson and T. Hampson, Liverpool, corn mer-
chants, at eleven, at the George Inn, Liverpool—June 29. J.
Stein, T. Smith, R. Stein, J. Stein, and R. Smith, Fenchurch-
street, merchants, at twelve, at the Court of Commissioners—
July 11. R. Reynolds, Shobrook, Devonshire, tanner, at
eleven, at the Angel Inn, Tiverton—July 10. T. Greenwood,
jun. Preston, Lancashire, upholsterer, at eleven, at the Bull
Inn, Preston.

CERTIFICATES, Jury 9.
E. Dixey, Oxford-street, optician—W. Welsford, Tower-
hill, merchant—J. Thornicraft, Coventry, victualler—S. Miles,
Ludgate-street, watch-maker.

PARTNERSHIPS DISSOLVED.
H. R. Homer and J. Marigold, Birmingham, plumbers—
W. 'Wright and J. Wright, Sheffield, merchants—J. Baron,
jun., J. Baron, and 11. Bond, Bolton, Lancashire, counter-
pane-manufacturers—J. Masterman, B. Davies, and M. Jones,
Runcorn, Cheshire, brewers—J. Wright and J. Wright, Ash-
ton-under-Lyne, Lancashire, cotton-spinners—T. P. O'Neill;
T. O'Neill, and T. Scarvell, Goswell-street, linen-drapers—
C. bibbin, P. Masey, sen., P. Masey, jun., T. David, and H.
Smith, Bristol, snuff-manufacturers, as far as regards P. Ma-
sey, sen., P. Masey, jun., and H. Smith—D. N. Vizen and
Co., Abchurch-lane. ,

FIDELITY OF TIIE Doc.—The regulations of
the Fleet prison prohibit the admission of dogs
into the interior : two of them, therefore, follow-
ing their masters to this abode, were stopped at
the door, near to which they have ever since re.
tamped their stations. More than once during
the period of their imprisonment the owners have
been severally removed by Habeas to the King's
Bench, and each time they were regularly at-
tended by their faithful friends, which, during
their sojourn there, remained as near to them as
possible. One of them, in particular, is never
absent many minutes together from the gates of
the Fleet, nor has it been for nearly three years
—the duration of its unfortunate master's incar-
ceration.

A man was crossing a small rivulet near Con-
niston Lane, and observed a toad sitting on the
edge, which, on seeing him fell into the water,
where was a large eel, which immediately gave
it battle. " It seized it by one of the hind legs,"
says the man, "and shook it as a terrier would
a rat." Still the toad defended itself with
great vigour, till the eel acyally severed its leg
from its body, which it swallowed, and again
returned to the charge, but with great care
evaded coming in front, till espying one of the
oad's unguarded moments, it seized the remain-
ing hind legs which soon shared the fate of the
former. There being no more prominent parts
behind,, or any other part to seize upon, without
rushing into the very heat of the battle, the poor
toad was suffered to escape with the loss of two
of its most useful: members.---(Westmoreland Ga-
zette)

LAW INTELLIGENCE.

COURT OF KING'S BENCH, JUNE 18.
THE ICING V. COLLINS AND OTHERS.

Our readers will recollect that this was an indictment againsr
Mr. Collins, Sir N. Conant, and, Mr. Mills, for having col;ru Pt-
ly refused to license the house kept by James Meek. J. Jury
found the defendants guilty.
Mr. SCARLETT was now heard against the rule obtained 03
a former day for a new trial.
The COURT postponed going farther into the case, as Mr'
Justice BAYLE r was obliged to leave the Court at two o'clock,

REX V. CHARLES KNATCIIBULL ESQ. AND OTHERS.
This was an indictment against 'Mr. Charles Knatchbull,
brother of the Member for Kent, and Messrs. Fowell and Par-
tridge, solicitors, for a conspiracy to obtain credit for the de-
fendant, Knatchbull, from certain tradesmen, by falsely repre-
senting that Mr. Knatchbull had not been paid a legacy of
3001. bequeathed to him under his father's will, whereas, 'g
truth and in fact, the legacy had been paid at the time of the
false pretence. The defendants were all found guilty at the
London adjourned Sittings after last Hilary Term, and in Eas-
ter Term a rule, nisi, having been obtained for a new trial,
Mr. GURNEY and Mr. ADOLPHUS were heard to-d3Y
against the Rule, but owing to the lateness of the hour at which
their argument was finished, the further hearing of the case wo•'
postponed until to.morrow.

HABEAS CORPUS.
Mr. CAMPBELL moved for a Habeas Corpus, to bring up the
body of Thomas James, from Carmarthen Gaol, to which he
had been committed by two Welsh Justices, for an alleged can'
tempt in imputing to them that thCy had acted with partialitY
towards him in a matter in which he was summoned before
them, touching the payment of a sum of 3s. which had been
paid on his account to the Clerk of the Peace, by his predeces-
sor, in the office of High Constable of the Itundred of Llau;
dovery. The circumstances stated by the Learned Counsel
disclosed a very extraordinary exercise of extra judicial au-
thority, but upon an ex parte statement, we forbear entering
into particulars. The defendant had been committed to the
County Gaol for the contempt, until discharged by due course
of law.

The COURT, under the circumstances stated, immediately
granted the writ.

THE RING V. THE CARLILES.
Mr. EvaNs moved for a rulQ to shew cause why the gaoler
of Gloucester gaol should not allow the defendants, who are
prisoners in his custody, the same air, exercise, and indulgence
as he allowed to other prisoners.
t• The LORD CHIEF JUSTICE said unless Mr. Evans made
his motion as the ground of a criminal proceeding, the Court
would not interfere. The Legislature had provided for the re
gelation of prisons, and unless there was barbarous and cruel
behaviour on the part of the gaoler, the Court could not make
any order.
Mr. EVANS could not say there was any charge of cruelty:
The parties deposed in their affidavits that they were treat
different from others in the prison.
The COURT decided that they could not attend to the aP'
plication without some case was cited to justify their inter-
ference.