The Sun.
London, England, 1807-01-28 00:00:00

PARTNERSHIPS DIS ;OLVED.

Messrs. S. Gundry, S. Hood, and S. Sytnes, of Bridport,
sait-cioth manufacturers.
J. c larkeanci I. Bayley, of Manchester, tninufaCturers.
j . T. and S. Morton Hubert, or Nate Lints, barge-builders.
W. Hedges and J . Brooks, of prick-lane, spnallicius, cheese-

mongers. .
Messrs. G. Grey and j. Kenncrsley, of Wych-strert, Drury-
lane, curriers.
F. Molloy and W. Coe, of Cannon-street, wine-coopers.
S. Hall, 'F. Taylor, and A. Slater, of Atherton, Lancaster,
iron-rounders.
j. Potter, W. Warren, and P.' W. Bertheau, of •Manchester,
merchants: •
E. Buckley, Edmund Buckley, John Buckley, amid Joseph
Buckley, of ham- Friar-Mear, in Sandteworth, York, and
j. Shaw, of Sandbed.lane, cotton-spinners.
joan and -loci Erigtand, or Bristol, tylers.
S. itwe„ and r. westwood, of Bow lane, Cheapside, whole-
sale ii..locriLishers.
E. -Barrow and I . Scott, of. Norwich, cotton-manufadurerS.
G. Seidenslicker and C. Y. Kende, of Bury-court, St. Mary-
Axe; merchants.
W. Waniwrii;nt and B. Ainsworth,. of Liverpool, anchor-

John Andrews, the surgeon, said, he was sent
for to dress Mr. Shepheard's wounds. Upon ex-
amining him, he found he had received a very
severe Wound at the top of his, which hecon-
sidered of a very dangerous nature ; and at present
he could not pronounce him out of danger.
The Prisoner denied having thrown the bottle ;
but said one of his companions did.'
The Prisoner; ,was committed ' to. Totliill-fields
Bridewell, till the fate of Mr. Shepheard is decided.
Mr. Brandon attended on behalf of the Proprietors
olCovent-Garden- Theatre, and said, it was their
determination to - prosecute, with the utmost. rigohr,
every one deteeled in throwing, any thing from the.
galleries into the pit, and to liberally reward those
who cic.tea .any one in the tae.

LAII REPORT.

COURT OF KING's BENCH, lAN. 27.

MORLRY AND OTHERSV. SIR JOHN INGOLDSBY, BART.
This case came before, the Court „upon special .
argnment.• The aetion. was brought upon two anr
nuity bonds executed by the Defendant, aud' the
collateral deeds of annuity. became a prin4iipal fea-
ture in, the course of, the -cause the-Chief 013)01
being to set, aside 'these deeds,. by,,,which certain
land had been conveyed iiitrust:_to
inersley and Co. bankers, in Mall; and the
question to be-decided wasp. Whether. the Memorial
-of these annuity deeds. set forth . the contents of the
deeds themselves sufficiently, agr'eeable to the Ad'
of the• 17th of His • present Majesty, commonly
;called Lord 'Looghborouglfs Aet ?
• From the vast nurnber Of pleas and demurrers,
:and other procvedings in this cause, the pleadingS
were very numerous ; and:
Mr. WETHERALL, for the Defendant, took a
number of objections to the Memorials in question.
Mr. HOLROYD, on the part of the 'Plaintiffs,, had
proceeded somelengt h in support of their case ; when
Lord ELLENBoROU,GH observed, that,' in all this
length of pleadings (the pleas, alone containing 44
fblicA) nothing had been marked out to the Court,.
so as to bring their minds to bear Upon the subject
'with respect to the. real question before them. It
had, his Lordship continued, been observed by some
persons, with.. great iuitiCe, that, the evils arising
from the Annuity A6l, by the' extended construction
of it, were much greater evils than those which The
Act was intended to remedy, 'and there must be. an •
cud to the Act altogether, in order to put an end to,
all *the-disputes which so continually arise upon this
subject".
The Court then dire6ted, that the pleadings should.
be mended, in order to bring the question properly
before their Lordships. The cause aeCordiingly stands
over for future consideration.-

REID V. DARBY.

. Mr. GARRONY applied, for a Rule to show cause
why the Nonsuit iu Lltis case she4uld not be set aside,
and •a V erdi& entered for 'the

This was an affion which had. been tried:at the
Sitting, 'after last Term., at Guildhall, and .was
brought to recover the value of the chip Glamorgan,
formerly belonging- to the, Plaintiff. The ship in
question left Liverpool upon a West India voyage,
and was condemned At Jamaica, and purchased by,
the Defendant for 4001.: She was then refitted,. and
returned to Liverpool with a valuable cargo, little the
worse for her voyage, and still worth a considerable
sum of money.
Upon the tr►al below, the Learned, Judge (Lord
ELtENBOROU GO, thought there then appeared
somethine c‘fan adoption of the art of the 'Captain,
in selling the. Ship, by the owner; but; as the case
now stood, the Court thought. it worthy of cousi:
deration, and the conditional Rule was accord►nly
granted. .