The Sun.
London, England, 1822-04-17 00:00:00

STRICTURES CURED.

BY a new Method the above troublesome
Complaint is entirely eradicated (without the use of
Bougie or Caustic), whether of long or short standing, ex-
cept constitutional, as well as all weaknesses generally ac-
companying it, and in a short time the whole system is re.
established, bring one of the greatest discoveries ever made.
By JOHN LYNCH, 44, Duke-street, St. James's.
Respectable references will be given if required.—All Let..
lers•to be post-paid.
N.B.—The price of the Medicine is Four Pounds a parcel.
A perfect Cure for Bilious Affection and Obstruction in the
Bowels.
Jnst published, price ss. 6d. Bvo.
A PRACTICAL TREATISE on NERVOUS and BILIOUS
COMPLAINTS ; with a new Method of Curing Strictures
without the use of Bougie or Caustic. With an Appendix
on the Diseases of Women and Children. By John Lynch,
44, Duke-street, St. James's.
Sold by Wm. Crawford, jun. 124, Cheapside.

To T. TAYLOR, Esq.
No. 9, New Bridge-street, London.

HONOURED SIR,
IBEG leave to inform you, that ever since the
year 1790, I had been afflicted with the Lues Venereal,
which, from its obstinately resisting every course et medicine
prescribed by the most eminent of the faculty here, and un-
dergoing severalsevere courses of salivation, and twice dis-
charged from the Hospital with little relief, would appear to
be of the must inveterate nature. In the spring of last year
my chortler had got to such a head, as nearly to put a period
to my existence—l had a large ulcer on the crown of my head,
one on each arm, and my legs were broke out in a frightful
manner; my right was dreadfully painful, and had been in a
state of ulceration for the last seven years; my' left had also
two large nodes on it, was very much discoloured, and gave
me such excruciating pain, particularly when warm in bed,
as nearly to deprive me of rest ; iu this lamentable state, I
was recommended by Mr. J. Thompson, (who received so
great a cure by them here), to take your Leake's Patent Pills,
which I began to do on the 26th o. May ; in the course of a
fortnight I began to receive benefit—in little more than a
month the ulcers on my head and arms were soundly healed—
soon after, the sores oa my legs healed also; leaving, how-
ever, considerable discolouration in the skin, and pain in the
bone of the left, which, by the blessing of God, ansl a little
longer per severance in your invaluable Medicine, subsided;
the nodes dispersing, the skin regaining its natural hue, and
the nocturnal pains gradually going off.—l thus became, by
your liberal advice and medicine, perfectly free from all my
former complaints—have recovered my former spirits and
strength, and am become jolly and fat, in which state having
continued many months, to the astonishment of all who knew
we, I am at a loss in what terms to express my gratitude, but
beg you, for the. good of other suffering mortals, to make
this my case as public as possible, as I shall on every occa-
sion; in so doing you will greatly oblige,
Sir, your grateful, obedient, very humble servant,.
ALEX. MURKER
Swan's Close, High-street, Edinburgh.
Witnesses to the above Cure:—
lobo Thompson, No. .3, New Poultry Market, Edinburgh,

John lt,l'intosh, Old Assembly Close, Edinburgh.

. •
Prepared and sold by the sole Proprietor, THOMAS TAY-
LOR, Member of the Royal College of Surgeons, at his
house, No. ti, New Bridge-street, London; whole, after a
constant residence of more than 40 years, in a practice parti-
cularly directed to the cure of Venereal Complaints and those
incidental to.. the Parts of Generation, with that inviolable
secrecy which men of his profession should always observe in
such cases, he flatters himself the advice and assistance he
gratuitomslv administers to persons taking this Medicine, will
be esteemed, by a discerning Public, as an advaitage seldom
Attainable, and void of all ambiguity.
Also sold, by his appointment, tor the convenience of those
living at a distance, at the Toyshop, No. 103, Oxford-street;
Mr. Disborough's, No. 7, Fish-street-hill; Mr. Baxter,
South-bridge, Edinburgh ; Callwel.'s, Dublin; and of
one person in every considerable town in Great Britain and
Ireland, in boxes 3f only 2s. 9d. each, stamped, and sealed up
with full and plain directions, whereby persons, of either
sex maveore themselves with ease, tPked, iccriev, and safety.

LAW INTELLIGENCE.

COURT OF CHANCERY.-TUESDAY, APRIL 16.

RYDER AND OTHERS V. PEMBERTON.

Mr. HART moved for an injunction to restrain the defend-
ants, Thomas and Edwin Pemberton, from transferring certain
Bank Annuities standing in their names as executors of their
father, the late Samuel Pemberton. The testator died in 1803,
and left to each of his children, who were eight in number, the
sum of 4,0001., to be invested in Bank Annuities for their use
and benefit ; and he appointed as his executors his widow and
the two defendants. The defendants were now the only execu-
tors, their mother having died in 1817. The plaintiff was a
daughter of the testator, and she complained that her brothers,
the executors, refused to account to her for the interest of her
4,0001. It might be necessary to inform the Court, that an in-
junction of a similar nature to that now prayed for had been
granted at the suit of a sister of the plaintiff. The parties,
however, had no come to a compromise, and were about to
dissolve the injunction which rendered the present application
necessary.
His Lordship granted the injunction.

BARTON V.

Mr. HEALD moved for a writ ne exeat regno under the fol-
lowing circumstances :—Some time in 1821 the plaintiff, Eliza-
beth Barton, was married to Mr. George Barton, upon which
occasion a marriage settlement was drawn up between the par-
ties, in which the bridegroom stipulated that the sum of 2001.4
with accruing interest, should be invested in Government Or
other securities, for the benefit of the bride. The defendant,
whom he would not at present name, for reasons which must
be obvious to the Court, was appointed trustee under this settle-
ment, and was at this moment possessed of 2091. Bs., which
the plaintiff claimed as her money, and of which she was ap-
prehensive of being altogether deprived, since she found that
the defendant had actually embarked with the whole of his
family on board the ship Mary, with the intention of proceed-
ing to the United States to settle there. The ship would sail
immediately, when it should clear the Custom-house.—lnjunc-
tion granted.

COURT OF KING'S BENCH, APRIL 16.
,MURRAY V. KING AND ANOTHER.
This was an action on a bond for 2,6001., conditioned for the
payment of a bill of exchange for 1,3001. The defence relied
upon was, that the consideration of the bill partly consisted of
other bills, for which an usurious discount was taken. The
usury sworn to, however, was only 121. per cent., while the de-
fendant's plea alleged it to have been 151.
Mr. CAMPBELL, therefore, on the part of the plaintiff, con-
tended that the evidence did not support the plea.
Mr. SCARLET T, for the defendants, argued that the plea was
substantially proved, by shewing that more than the legal in-
terest had been received, which was sufficient without proving
the precise sum set forth by the pleader.
The LORD CHIEF JUSICE, however, held that it was ne-
cessary, in order to support the plea, to prove the usury to the
full extent alleged in the pleading.
Verdict for'for the plaintiff, 1,0001.
lIERRING A7jtl:l ANOTHER V. GOWLAND AND ANOTHER.
This was an action by Messrs. Herring and Richardson
owners of the ship Frances and Eliza to recover a loss sustain-
ed by theth in Consequence of; the breach of duty of William

The SOLICITOR-GENERAL and Mr. CAMPBELL conduct-
ed the plaintiffs' case, and Mr. SCARLETT the defendants'.
The case was this .—ln the year 1014, the plaintiffs freight-
ed the vessel with convicts for Government to New South
Wales, intending that she should take in a cargo of coffee
from Batavia to England. The testator was the Captain.—
In the outward voyage she was. captured by an American
frigate, but after a short detention permitted to resume
her voyage. After delivering the convicts at Botany Bay,
she proceeded to Batavia and took in a cargo of coffee.—
By Act of Parliament, British vessels are prohibited from
landing coffee in bulk, and .it is. expressly required that the.
coffee should be made tip in bags, boxes, or other packages ; it
was alleged that the testator, in breach of his duty, had carried
the coffee in question in bulk, having for•that purpose cut, or
untied the bags, and thrown it loose into the hold. When the
vessel arrived, the cargo was seized for this cause, being in
breach of the Act of Parliament. In order to release the cargo,
the plaintiffs were obliged to memorialise the Treasury, .and
they got back the cargo upon paying certain fines, which, toge-
ther with incidental expences, amounted to 6001. The Captain
had died on the voyage homewards, and it appeared that he had
been an old and faithful servant of the plaintiff's. •
Mr. SCARLETT contended in point of law that the action
would not lie, and animadverted ni* the 'hardship of the
action, considering the profits which the plaintiff had made by
the voyage, and the irreproachable character and meritorious
conduct of the deceased, who had left a very small property for
the maintenance of an aged mother.
The LORD CHIEF JUSTICE was of opinion, that the action
would certainly lie for the negligence of the deceased, who was
bound to know his duty in the particular mentioned, but it was
for the Jury to say to what amount the plaintiffs had been
damnified.

The Jury found for the plaintiff—Damages 2031. ss.
THORN-TON AND OTHERS V. BUSK..

This was an action on a breach of contract. The plaintiff's,
Messrs. Thornton and Co., are merchants trading to Russia.—
In Nov. 1820, they contracted with the defendant for the sale
of a quantity of tallow, to be shipped from their house at St.
Petersburgh in the month of July following, by a vessel, the
name of which they would notify to him as soon as they learned
it. The tallow having been shipped in June by the Comet,
they advised the defendant accordingly ; but upon finding that,
by the terms of the contract, (which did not run in the ordin-
ary form with the words " on or before,") the tallow was, to be
shipped in July; they apprised him of the mistake, informing
him at the same time that he might have his choice of either
the tallow conveyed by the Comet, or tallow to be ship-
ped by come other vessel in the month of July. A fall,
hosiever, having taken, place in the market, and the de-
fendant supposing that the plaintiff's mistake had ren-
dered the contract unbinding upon him, declined to abide by
it, and refused to take the tallow. The plaintiffs, therefore,
disposed of it at a loss, and brought this action to recover the
amount of the difference between the sum for which they ac-
tually sold it, and that for which the defendant had contracted
to purchase it.
The LORD CrirEr JUSTICE was clearly of opinion that the
plaintiff's had performed the conditions of the contract on their
parts, and that the defendant was bound, in point of law, to
adhere to it. Under his Lordship's direction, therefore, the
Jury found for the plaintiffs--Damages 2471.