The Sun.
London, England, 1836-09-20 00:00:00

PRICES OF STOCKS TIM% DAY-AT ONE O'CLOCK.
Bank Stock. — , India Stock ........................... -- ‘
3 per Cent. Red. - ,Ditto konds .................... 3 5 die.
3 per Cent. Cons 89 Sis 9% 9 South Sea Stock ................. .--
314 per Cent. — Old Annuities ..................... --
Ditto Red --I New Ditto ................ .. ........ 87
New :”4 per Cent
New 3 per Cent 97'4 '4,,3,-,.' 13 per Cent. Annuities, 1751...
--- I Exch. Bills, .£l,OOO 3l 3 pm.
Bank Long Annuities to expire (Ditto .............. 500 3l 3 3
1 4 p pm.
Jan. 5, !SWDitto Small
Oct. 10, 1850 - --- !Ditto Commercial --— pm 3
1 3 pm.
Jan. 5. 1800 ls'; 218
Ditto Advertised •
Jan. 5, 1880..... -- 'Bank Stock for Account
Apt il 5, 1980 - India Stock for Account ...... ... 25614
Jan. 5, 1870 -- Consols for Acconnt...B9 IA ss u%l
Omnium -- pm.

PRICES OF FOREIGN FUNDS
Austrian Bonds ...................
Belgian Bonds ....................

THIS DAY AT ONE O'CLOCK.
Peruvian Bonds

- Ditto Account
Portuguese Bonds
Ditto Account
Ditto New Bonds ........50 49 5`..? 1
Ditto Account 5o I 49 52 1
Ditto, 3 per cent 3l 30 4 2%
Prussian Bonds
Russian Bonds, 105% 6?
Ditto Account...... lO6 536 6
Ditto Metallic
Spanish Bonds
Ditto Account

Ditto Account. ..........
Brazilian Bonds
Ditto Account S Si SO
Buenos Ayres Bonds —
Ditto Account . ......
Chillian Bonds ............ ....•.. —1
Ditto Account —
Columbian Bonds
Ditto Account
Columbian Bonds, IS2I. —.22% 2
Ditto Account ........
Danish Bonds

Ditto Bonds, V,34 2444 3 4% ;414
Ditto Account 24% 3 4%34
French, 5 per —l. —c.
4 per cent —f. —c.
2 per cent. --f --c.

Ditto Account
Greek Bonds
Ditto Bonds, 1t25
Ditto Account
Mexican Bonds, 5 per cent —
Ditto Account
Ditto, 6 per cent ...... 23
Ditto Account
Papolit3.n

-- Eichange f. —c.
Dutch, 25, per cent. ...5(g4 50 3,4 1
Ditto Account soy‘, 1 5034?;,
Ditto, 5 per cent. 100 091,
Dittß Account 100 U 1:931 100

PRICES OF SHARES THIS DAY AT ONE O'CLOCK.
Paid. Per Share.
General alining Association l5 I I
Commercial Blatkwall Railway Company 2 I% 074
Edinburgh and Glasgow
Brighton Railway Company
London and Greenwich Railway Company 2O 21%
London and Southampton Railway Company 25 22
North and South Junction Railway 3 1%
South Western Railway Company 1 0%
General Steam Navigation Company

Arrived. Due.
0 America . 0
0 Brazil
0 Buenos Ayres
n Carthagena
1 Dublin...
0 Flanders 0

MAILS.
.I Arrived. Due Arrived. Due
1 France 0 0 Lisbon 1
0 nusrli.&Jersey 0 0 Malta
0 Hamburg 0 0 Mexico 0
0 Holland
0 Jamaica
0 Leeward Islands 0 I Waterford 0

HIGH WATER AT LONDON BRIDGE TOMORROW.
AS ...... sminutes after 11. Evening 41 minutes after 11.

HAMBURG, AUGUST 26, 1836.
null Friends, and all those who may have to write
to us, are requested to he particular in directing,
HEINE BROTHERS, in HAMBURG,
and any person having to remit money to us, is requested to observe
that by Hamburgh Steamer a letter containing one Bank Note, be
it 30!.601. 901.', or any higher amount whatever, is liable to double
postage only ; but 301. for instance remitted in three Ten Pound
.Notes, or in Six Five Pound Notes, would by far encrease the
postage. It will, therefore, be advisable for any one, having to re-
mit money to Hamburg, to be particular in remitting the whole
amount in one note.

HEINE BROTHERS,

The publication of Tun SUN NEWSPAPER commenced this day
at 15 minutes past Three o' Clock.

-.. •
,
- -
e -

(tif
it'/4•N
/

-v.,

LONDON,
TUESDAY EVENING. SEPTEMBER 20, 1836

In the Journal du Commerce of Sunday we find an
article on the opinions of the English Press, with re-
spect to the Spanish question, in which The Sun and
tie Mornin!,Y Chronicle are denominated organs of the
'Whig Government, and extracts from their articles are
unr-)ted to show the recklessness with which his Ma-
jestV's Ministers attack those, who oppose their poli-
tical views. We have great respect for the opinions
of the Journal du Commerce on many subjects ; we
admire- the philosophical moderation of the language
of its articles ; but, with respect to our opinions,
on the -conduct of the French Government towards
Spain, could our Gallic contemporary only find
cause of offence in the manner in which we thought

proper to express them ? Was there nothing erro-
neous in the opinions themselves ? If there were,
why did not the organ of the Doctrinaires point them
out, rather than fall foul of us for not employing a
more diplomatic phraseology in the expression of se-
vere censure ? The Journal des Debats had stated
in an article which preceded ours, that France
was responsible to herself, and to herself only,
for her conduct towards Spain. We denied this.
We asserted that France having voluntarily signed
the Quadruple Treaty, had made herself respon-
sible to the other high contracting Powers for all
acts performed in violation of its express and im-
plied stipulations. Does the Journal dzt Commerce,
in quoting this passage, attempt to deny the fact ?
No ; the writer, we presume, is too well acquainted
with the principles of international law to make such
a blunder. Where then was the want of courtesy in
showing that the flippant arrogance of the Debats was
founded on an ignorant assumption of a fiction for a
fact ? We also stated that whatever appearances
Louis PHILIPPE might assume, he was secretly
disposed to place Don CA RLos on the Throne of
Spain. Is this a fact ? If it be not, wherefore has
the Journal du Commerce passed it over without a
word of contradiction ? And if the statement made
by us be indeed true—if, as we asserted, and
continue to assert, Louis PHILLIPPE signed the
Quadruple Treaty only to delude England, while at
the same time he. was giving the Northern Powers
the most :positive assurances that he would do
nothing to advance the cause of Constitutional
liberty in the Peninsula—if while he gave orders to
the Spanish Legion under BERNELLE, to advance to
the frontiers of Spain as an auxiliary force, he secretly
encouraged the transmission of money and stores to
Don CARLOS—and if, he privately fomented the
Constitutional flame in the provinces, with the in-
tention of providing himself with a plausible pretext
for declaring the Quadruple Treaty dissolved—if all
these facts be capable of easy authentication—we ask
the Journal du Commerce could we employ language
too strong in the denunciation of such perfidy ? We
care not what the organs of the Doctrinaires may
think of this matter, but we will never stop to select
phrases studiously respectful when denouncing the
conduct of a betrayer of the liberties of two great and
noble nations—and such is Louis PHILIPPE.

It is evident from the tone of several articles which
have recently appeared in the Madrid Gazette that
the new Spanish Ministry is not only aware of the
treachery of the French Government, but even prepared
for something like a demonstration in favour of Don
CA Rims. The QUEEN-REGENT and her advisers
are no longer the dupes of French diplomacy. They
perceive the drift of Louis PHILIPPE'S policy, and
we rejoice to observe that they are very far from meditat-
ing the expediency of succumbing to it upon any question
which may involve the stability of the Constitution.
Although the articles in the Gazette are ostensibly
intended to refute the arguments put forth by the
Journal des Debats, it is very evident that they are
from the pen of a Minister, and disclose only the
opinions and sentiments of the Spanish Government.
The Madrid Journals received yesterday contain one
of these remarkable articles, which appeared in the
Gazette of the 7th inst. After referring to an article
in the Debats, in which it was stated that the procla-
mation of the Constitution of 1812 absolved France
from her engagements in favour of the QUEEN, and
after pointing out how much
the Carlists would gain
by such treacherous conduct on the part of France,
the writer in the Madrid Gazette
proceeds thus :

When an alliance exists between two nations the events
and variations which occur in the interior of one of them rela-
tive to its form of government oinzht not to influence in any
way the basis of that alliance. This is a principle of public
lay', which all the phrases of the Journal des Debats cannot
falsify. When the forces under Rodil penetrated into Portu-
gal, for the purpose of completing the victory over Don Mi-
guel, did either the General, or the soldiers, or the Govern-
ment of Madrid, inquire what form of government was to be
established in that country? No; our duty was to contribute
to the ruin of the Miguelite party, which was contending
against the allies of Spain ; and this duty we fulfilled faith-
fully, without vain words, without any secret views, and with-