The Sun.
London, England, 1807-12-18 00:00:00

POLICE.

Gt.iontlri..—Yesterday a yOung man 'cif very
gentecl•appearance, of the name-Of -Smith, under
went examination, being charged witirsgoing on
Wed nesd.ty :evening last into tha shop 'of Mr.: fillies,
watcmaker, in Ludgate-stieet; under pretence :of
puit.:lla,ing a watch, and2rhaning ,orf. with a.gold
watch along 'the Broadw'ay, 'Biadkfriars. lieing.
clokely pursued, he was apprehended 'at .the corner
orlinionestrcet, -with the property; which wa' pro-
duced and sworn to by the Prosecutor:' •The Pri-
soner wasStilly.comtnitted for trial.

, .. WO a RIO r- STE EET.-,-Yesterday John Metctql, and
Mary Skating alias Mel call , were filially -eitatuitied,
being charged.by Jeffery 13ent,.Ellislient, Esqs. and
others, with .stealing. a large. quantity of sheets,
shirts, table Cloths, and , other articles, out of an er--
rand cart in. I3ishopsgate,street, the property .of
he. above Gentlemen. They were committed to
-Negigate for trial. ' . .
QUEEN;S-SialiAnE.--Yesterdily ' a shocking , in..
'stance of youthful depravity .was heard at this Office.
A smart • young
,boy„ of the name of 11/in. Fiewell, •
was charged' by . Goodeneugh, •ti constable, with
stealing a. iiiiety of artiCles, partictilarly wrdoilit
iron, and ,rna-iy of them thols- of • v:thie,'abOut IV est-'
initiStet4 'bud. a Wona'an of the xru Clarke.; who
hit an old iron shot), in Viticki,kreet.,-. whet'e the'
articles; to the iamOut 0f7,2 potitidiiti'leiglit, were
Sound, was charged as being the. receiver. A very
tniiitate examination took 'place; :and no doubt. was.
entertained as to their guilt, the property and per-
sons being identified. Mr. Colguhoun, in pity to
hii'widowed mother, consented that the boy should
be Wait to the Marine SoCief -it tind;' after a- sei'vi'z::
. adt*iftitien iii the Oceiyer, 'h i Wilt ted "litrio:Ba fliitl
the 'SeSiicins,'ibilindeMil parove-q-ittl7 gasds
in the mean time.l*: 1 ''klr:in
'II A TrOti -GAmp i:,si..'-'-`-, YeatddaYairee .tcVq, Ltii_za,
about `dine years !if lEig:ol,,otrPiiitimiiisteri)a!lci 01e-
.. *
gory;:". about" !lateen'," :#.*.*:cexr9` htc,d ii' - sec't,nd.
tithe',charged 'with gollig uffitethglt,TptiblitAionse,
in' GOsW4ll'-.street, and ' sittflibi .if one•:. poi*: n!*-'
and -a' pawn, both belonging toil the serVant- iiiaiti;'
the.gOwn they pledged with 'a, paWribroker 'hi. the-
nathe 'Of Weed, for ss. ' Luna was /iid' principal in.
the robbery, who enjoined seCrecy.tq th 6 rest, - and
told them they *ought to dire rather than ow:ti to the
robbeil, ; but Gregory, not being st; hardened, co4n-
fessed being much in the company of, the two for-
trier; and that they used to gold clubs in Smithfield
hisiket, ' Jewin-street, ' ptid Whitechapel, for 'in-
stritalbris from the more 'experienced thieves. As
flintier liiiriry was deemed neec..giaiy, they were.
cbminatea tor re-examination. . .

thaw'z-HALi.— ,YeSterday Cro.nning, a'
notorious and well known' chara6ter,was -brought!
up.,"Charged, on the oath ofoneGriff, With exposing'
for'sale a-uiantity. of Porter, without' a licence.—
Gotrdeposed that on the 14th' inst. he- went, in
company with an acquaintance 'of his, to Pepper-
alley, where Crooning 'lives ;• and that there.they
had a'quantity of porter, for Which they paid.--dt
was also proved, try a -Mr. May,' that the Defendant
made application, on the sth of Noveluber, to have
the licence of his-house renewed, but that then he
Was refused, and that, 'notwithstanding the refuSal,.
be had .been ever since in the constant haWt of sell-
ing beer, &c, as usual. The above statement hav-
ing been el-early proVed, :he Was convi6tcd in the
penalty of gaol.

COV ENTGA DENTU EATR I...I4:AUMZUTOW, who
has been long known in the Dublin and Liverpool
'Theatres, last night matte-his first- appearancel be-
fore a London audience,. as -.Brulgruddery, in the
Comedy of. John Bull. Mr. .HANtrdatoroN is not
green in youth, laut.heAs not too tar .dcclined into
the vale of years" for etfcaive service. , a stout
good•looking hum, a native ,Of Ireland, =la resped.
able aktor.

YeSterday, in Chelsea College, a Court-Martial,
composed uf General and Field Officers, proceeded
on
Gast
ttial off" Sir. CitAtti.Ls 11(;Tit AM, Colonel of
the York Itegiment of 'Militia. The charges,
which were fifteen in number, were preferred by .11.
LEG, ab, Son* Captain of. the same Itegitnent.—
lifter Mr. 11.1roga, the Judo Advocate, had dk-
tinaly read the:charges, the 15rosecutor (Capt. lx .:•!
GA,ao) addressed the Court iii a short but elegant
speech.—Atler the examination of's'eVeral witneises
.011 the two first charges, the ,court. adjourned at.
three o'clOck.---The Owl of EOTOS, Qalonef of
• the West Suffolk Militia, is Preident of the Court..
Thursday morning, as the Telegraph Coach was
:on the road to Kilmarnock, a girl about six years
o`f•age,-- who, with her parents, was. in the Coach,
was lookittg out at the door, which, flak being pro
. -
_lndy fastened, flew open, and the poor child fell
out, and was killed on the spot, in pros,:nee
Aided
.paren,ts.
On'Wednesday evening, as Mr. Wilson, an artist,
'in SWalloW-street, was returi,ing to London, be was
stopped by tw'o footpads, between. W.pliitig and
Shooter'i-hill, disguised with black-crapo over their
_faces; who, with menaces, demanded his money
One of them presented pistol,' but this did nut
saficiently intimidate Mr. W. who, Whilst pretend-
mug to search his pocket's for money, struck the
low who presented the pistOl a violent bIOW 'on the
head with a stiek; and etTcaed atiltnniediate eseape,
by clapping spurs to his boric, The robbers. fired
pfi the pistol. on. Mr, w:s retreat, but he was too,
riii:off to receive any injury.

SMITHFIELD MARKET, Die. tS.
Thii day's Market was we)l supplied with prime
Beasts 'and the show in general wls rather plentiful ;
Beef and Mutton are dearer than our last report;
Pork and" Veal are cheaper ; and the trade for the
most part was not very good..—The sales in the Hay-
rnarket were not lively Hay fetched a better price
than Monday's market ; Clover has dropped in
price ; Straw spld at last price.—We subjoin a correft
statement of the prices and numbers :
„..

• To sitik.the 01141 pet stone of 81b. '
Beef js. 4d. to 4s. Bd.—hluttoo Is. 4d. to ss.
4s. od. to 6s. od.—Ladtb os, ott. to os. bd.—Pork 4s. od, to
ss. A.
Beasts. oo.— Sheep 4500. Calves, 320. Pigs 450.
flay 4t. tos. to 51.1t05. od.--Cluver st Ss. Gd. to 61. 6s.
od—traw tl. 14s. od. to 21. os . oil.

CORN EXCHANGE., DIM. tB.---TO-day's supply of
Wheat is rather short, but the sales are very heavy,
and scarcely maintain last prices; Rye rather dearer;
Barley in plenty, Rnd somewhat cheakr ; White
Pease full as dear ; Beans of both sorts rather lower
Oats are likewise in short supply, and maintain the
pr►ices quoted; Flour at our last curreruq.

L.< UP REPORT.

r'
v

OuRT oF.

110W0i1TH WILL.S.

This was a ease of literary property, foiopicaey of
the Plaintiff's work. .

Galittow,' for the statedthat he
*Attii,Printer, and a 'person of great ing/ennity and
application ; and, by lii,4'6'wn extierience: and -the
inthrmation givca hire: 'by Gwitlemen skilled in thr:-
science of fencing, he lead been enabled to publisq
a most useful and scientific work, entitled, -" The
Art of Defence on Foot, in the liComf Sword and

Sabre ; adapted also to tin) Spadroon; or Cut-
and-thruit Sword." wor the 15ele-ndant:,

in a compilation' of which 'he Was the publisher,
called Encycloptcala Londinensis: h'ad thotight
per to tipisroptiate to -hituatlf and. our 'of t,t thpagtio
of which:' the, Plaintilri book .e6nsiiited";:na;less
tban 73 were literally' Copidd by the Dcfend,qtiL
This, however, was 'not the caSti;' in other
-park, (win some instalices; In: had inlerted. wortl4!
1.14 0,;,.'n of the- smile urport as the.PlaitultrP;
ed"to tiro J'lw Tih • , 10p ) Jury, -0%7

ever, upoli a Moment's examination, wOuld see how
baeel4c;...,•d• ft piracy this \vas, and lio\tr much ‘.the-
Pliiihtitf had :suffered by it. ' •
Mr. GAitIOW then proceeded to road ihriolis pay:
sages fromAiffereut parts. of the ieveial productibn's
in 4.thich it appeared. that the Defendant-had 4'l'o,

stituted and i!ra.sed many:- words, in • Order'to.ityi4-1,4

deieeliun.

Thi4 ..bowevr, was, riot 'for ,the

Plaintiff, -in order to, render a book of this: kind more

prael ically useful, had ..hiserred. twit:3l)la; of ttguiLts;

. .
on the attitudes dtikeribeti in the bodrofitho work
these alqo'the Defendant. copied; into his
ciopincrra, but here-, he had .displayed
\varinejs ; for though his kures wt:te. in cx:taly rho
same auitudersas those orthe l'hiintiffs, yet he 1):1,-1
taker; the'precaution to fill up the dre'ss, which
th<4 :Lictok was a nine outline. Soniciitnti,',
cw. /the Detodant
more, th,-.ti

. .
1,1-r, ,in a3ew inte!aty.x.s, lie WO alterea -the 00;:s,..; ;
that which in
,00q,work : was io'acle• a Higillnt)dc:r,
in the other. was c9siverlet4 into :lll.Atistrian ; where

• . .
one bad an helmet-, another Was provided with a hax.
The principle of the Jaw - in-these cases (said Mr.
GARRowIAs Perfectly,elear •that no MAW shall •take
341yotage.:of the ,labours Of another, witllptl.fatle,ait
Milit.)ng:cohipCll,iatiO“ for that advantage. On theyy
grounds, the Plaintiff submitted. that he was entitled
to recover damage's for this infringement upon his
copyright.
Major Charles James deposed, that he had prac-
tised the attitudes with Mr. RowOrth tier the porpcs4
of!thiS work, and had given biro the information
relp4ilrig, the' spadroim, or cut-and-thrust'swaid;
whiCh the witness conceited might be usOlii to the
army, and ,had never been employed in this t ointry.
A
Mr. Michael mzeto gait evidence, that he kid ;
taught the art of fencing twenty-fine,YearA.• He
had purchased the PlaintiPs book, and had received
,the greatest instruction (rem it. -He believed it to
be entirely original, particitlarly. that pirt Of It •Whleit
related to the spadroon. ' '

. .
Mr. Taylor swore;. thithe had stood for thiatii-•
tufts. when they were drawn by Mi. lt. 'K. Port.:!r.
He- believed the book to bcpriginill, and had never
received more instrn-6tion fi'otn any work'in his life;
though h 6 had studied and 'taught fencing for rtearly'
forty years.

Ebenezer Stalker .proved the 'engraving of .thO'
plates froni the original drawings, and' likewkii that'
many of the Defendant's were copied' frtirn then),
with some trifling alterations; 'as also- did Mr. Vn
cent, Woodthorpe ;Ind Mr. Ashby; •itho•had.cl4,
fully examined the plates in the seivrafd works. with-
conkosa,s.

John Cari,hreman to the Defendant; proved tlot
of'the ntunber Of the Encyclopiedia • 'ih
,iirt of" fencing, 'about 2tion had-been sold.
the riaine of Elliot was -atihed to 'the ,engravino•4,,
the artist that designed theni, Vet they were tOnlilp
ni'qf,le from plates -purchased- :or lass than 51: <A. Mr:,
Colemitb, Cockspur-street,
'Tic ATTU EMUlit AL, for the Def&Pda t
COUICII (led, that I he. I'laintilr had no right'to.retovt,r.
His Client was liberal a man as any io,the
lession, and was fair from desirinc, to rob any.indi,-
rif the ju3t reward af,ltis ILotirs. . The work(
piablishod by the Defendant pi okiscd. to be marelvi
a coMpilation item other authors ; -and more licened
was to be alloWed in a publiCation Of that naturd
than in any% other, because thd"dobipiler.did.not
itess it to be an 'original compOtitietr, Ittirther, iv
'was to be noticed, that MrAtotvorth's • bOok was.
brought out in I 7913., 'and the DeTelidatit's`not until
the year 1,80, - taCatlieA Counsel' aksaiilated
the.preactit easoto that of a Review-; where' the, most
;interesting parts of; a Work. were ettratSlecli-and.whien
s ryectla a • recommendition 'oto are original ; but
supposing even that the person' who read • the
view should be satisfied, and not purchase the.origioali
an aaion .would not. liw. With resped to the en,
gravings, there WO one objetlion which put., their)
entirely out of the ease. By-Aa (4* Etrliameta it
was declared, thatunless the publisher's name, was
annexed-to the print,. he .meld not fecover damages
in an atiion fOr :pltigiary; But if this,yerecfroAe.,
ous, the Rlaintiff.coUld not maintain, this i!f4tioni,
.for, in a case brought before-Lord Kenyon, Tepeet.,
Mg two prints of My. Uncle Toby and Molly Sea,
gritn, his Lordship had. p:prcssed his opinion, that
the party .could recover only. wln the main design
Of an original work had been imitated:: here, how-
vet., the main.design had not.beetr copied, for the
44ttline
.was all that was taken; ;;tine}the dressy the,
'p•riocipal part of the plate, waS introdeced the
Delendatat to each Abe public eye. - .Upon these
;gromids, he insisted that the PJaintitYcould,not re.
FQ,YeX!-
;,przl ELLENBoItOIIOII, that thii aian was
,brOught under the statute of Queen Anne, which
gave. to authors an exclusive coppaight for fourteen
years, in case of their being for fourteen
years longer. Whatever indulgence theJurrmight
be disposed to allow the betendalit as a -compiler,
he was not by that means- to, injure priVate in-
diVidualt, brcopying their publications ;..for it such
a permission were to be given, it wOold ditiLte,t
to say where the prsdice, would end. Even in tug
caie of a Review, if swum:it eft the work were copied
as to induce individuals to be contented with that,
and not to purchase the origin.il, an adioo
certainly lie. • As to the plates, the outline in a work
of this nature is undoubtedly the main de6ign, fir it
the attitude wWch is prinLipally rcquised. it Cie
Jury' should think the Vlaintuf untitled to a ver..:t,

ley w6t Id give the damages upon the letter-presq
and h. trgravings separately, at; there might be a
(itieAi 3- w the latter. Verdtft f6r the Plaintitt—
Dama i's Ar the letter-press 701. until. far Me en.
graings 30/.

JAFFRAY V. DU BOIS.

This was an 'a6kion upon a policy of insurance,-
occupied the\ Court from tv.•tk o'clock till. six
in the afternoon. It was upon the Mentor, upon a
voyage from the St:within', Demarara, Berbice, and
Essequibo, to England,
The ATTORIIIM.GENTERAL said, that he could not
devise what defence was to be made to this
,aaien ;
but as the ship in,question was lost:by the Perils Of
tout: it for granted, as usual, that the
Underwriters meant to 'say that • he Wlis not 'sea-
worthy. He could, however, flrOve to the satisfac-
thin of the Jury, that the-ves.iel was remarkably
wrongly bullt ; that she was perfeclli, soluld in all
respects; and that, previously 'fo her sailing upon
the Voyage, the subject of this policy, she had deli-
vered a cargo of val.:table spices frein Batavia, in the
best condition. The ves!;el was injured bn a part of
the coast of bemarara,"bY getting on shore ; and 'al-
tetwards„ although she was cleared, he was obliged
.to proceed to the nearest pOrt, where she was coin-
(tanned, in consequence of the injury she received
by this accident.
Mter the evidence bad been produced,
Mr. GARROW, for the Defendant, 'said, that the
Vessel was not sea-worthy, and that the Plaintiff
was also completely aware of that fait. Mi.. GAR-
' ROW said, he would prove, by the letters of the
Plaintiff, himself, 'that he Was well aware that the
' Mentor was completely unfit for sea; and he had-
declared to his.agent, Capt, Stephen Son, that she was
good for nothing ; and when the former Mentioned
the subjeA of repairing her by putting a new false
keel, the. Plaintitf wrote to him—" Do not touch
her false keel, for it will cost the Devil and all to
block her up again. Pray do not attempt to repair

it. ,
Capt. Stephenson deposed to these fatls, after
which the Jury considered far' ;ifew minutes, and
returned a Verdid for the Plaintiif•Of 1501.

COURT OF CHANCERY, IC

LOWTEN U. Tim CORt'ORATiONtIf COLCItEtfER.
fn4, nig case was lately before the Court, when the
I4IRD CHANCELLOR
,was pleasedlo 'order that the
injun6tion, restraining (he PlaintitV from proceeding
at law, on a mortgage over the Detendants' estates,
to the extent of 29001. granted to him for certain ac.
counts elbusiness,,should be confined till the hear-
ing of eat! cause; but that the Defendants should,
In the mean time, pay into the Court the sum of
4.6oLand interest, being the amount of one part of
the aecount which was supposed to-stand in a dif-!
ferent situation Irom the remaining part.
The question came again before the LORD CHAN-
__

~.C.41.e4 this day, On cross motion. That fur the
Plaintilf prayed—that, though the injunelion re-
straining him -Rom proceediog on his sureties were
to be continued, still that 'he should be at liberty to
proceed on the arbitrator's award ; .at all events,
that the whole amount of the Plaintiff's claim
should be paid into Court. The motion for the
,Deleildants, on the other hand, ameonted to this—
that they, having already paid to the Plaintiff a sum
iu name of interest on the whole claim, whiclf ex-
'coded the particular:sum and interest which they
were ordered to pay into Court, the order .against;
them as to this particular sum Should' be discharged.
Sir A. Ptoorr, Mr. Riciwtns, Mr. WETiIanALL
and Mr. ilott*tc, for the. Plaimitf, argued the case
at considerable length, particularly enlarging on the
superior situation in-which the Plaintiff stood, from
Laving a decree of the Arbiter in his favour, •
• ,
that as the case was cognizable in 'Courts of Law,
there was no neceksity for the interference of his
Lordship. The conduel. of the Defendants, they
contended, had from the beginning. been market by
a desire, under deceitful pretences, to lull the' Plain-
tiff asleep; and now, at the distance of 16 years
from the original contraction of the debt, when all
the other parties who might have been individtially
bound to him; were either dead or prote6ted by the
Statute of Limitations, they came forward and al-
teged that their own obligations, as the acts of the
seleia body, were not binding on the Corporation.
In so argoingtheir case, the Corporaii6n sowed a
total want a,every !cella, of moral reaitude, that
they, hati,no.sonl to auiuiate and govern their ac-
tions. this uitttation, whatever might be, hifi
tofiship's (Tinian - as to the etfea'of the At t,iiter'S
decision; the Learned Coumel subinitted,,, it being
apparent that delay .had, from the beginniog been
out leading Wait itt t4p char.t.lor, that ,
ilk Lordship must order the sum, clair2,ed,. and to
which, unquestionably,. the. Plaintiff, prima jack,
was•.entitled, to be paid. into Court.
Sir VA:4I.IIiL SIIMII,LYi Mr. l'uom soN, •and
GlilMWeinD, for the • Defendants, contended, that
Ole deilision bf the Arklier,could TioWbly alter
the nature of 'the Piaintiers right in a Court of
Equity. If tlitrArbiter,.on'a'retOenee by the seleel
bodyidetertnitied 'that :expenCes; 'not incurred for
corporate t-ituoticittes, Ineyertlieleis, to be paid
out of the corporate funtts,-it was ridiculous to say,
that, On that account, 'the Corporation 'was: bound
by thedeeision the Arbiter, and precluded from
seeking 'redress in that Court. There were' only
two grounds,On which :parties entitled ttvrtninjunc-
tion-could yet be bound to pay their Money into.
Court; The one of these was t herobable ultimate
deeisien of the ease 5 the other, the risk 'of 'the par-
tici beemnitig less able to pay. On the former .of
tlwse 'it' wonkt be •iMproper 1n the Counsel to pre-
tend to lime formed soy judgment, while his Lord,:
hip's Ofiinibn was stilt' onkitown. On the hitter
they'sabmitted, th,it liere.could be tin possible risk ;
the Corporation fluids were not,. like those of an
likely to he made away with i and a
Corporation, which could 1)2 nippdied, lesOtan any
other, party, capshie of irnmediately raiairlg money
'to be paid into Court, must he entitled to the.
'interference 'of a Court of Egnity in that reSptea,
, the more particularly as it must he produtlive-. of
the'most toinons'cOhsequences to the Body, in the.
event Of their being uhim.itely.soccesSful. that, they
should have beOn Obliged 'to.dispoqe of their corpci-
, rate property at the ifitinlent, to'ohey:an
'kid, as it, roust afterwards turn vitt to be, an onne-•
order.. Learned Counsel on the other

side had so analyzed the Corporation, as to disen-er
that they had no soul. They ought also, at the
same time, to have discovered,• that they had no
nit4tlS of repelling attacks made on. them: There
Might, therefore, be wit,, but unquestionably there
'could not be magnanimity in preferring such attacks.
As to the cross motion, the Leal-tam Counsel
sub-
witted, the lkfendants hating already paid to the
Plaintiff more than the sum ordered on account of a
particular business to be paid into Court, should be
relieved from that order. - 1
. ,
T u CHANCELLOR Lon CHANCEI.OR could not 'agree in tne
suggestion, that, because a Court of Law might pus.
sibly esteem itself entitled-to, take cognizance-of a
question like the present, this Court should, on, that
account, deny its own proper jurisdiction. .When
his Lordship urst came into Westminster Hall, the
powers of a Court of Law on such cases were es-
teemed infinitely more infirm than they seethed to
he regarded at the present moment ; but mf• that
account he was not to shut the door of the-Court of
Chancery on persons applying to him for relief. He
also knew that it was held by certain legal authori- -
ties, that a Corporation vas to be esteemed as a6l-
ing in the capacity of Trustees. His mind was not
thoroughly made up. to the etleia of embracing this
datrine. But, on the other hand, if this were not
to be esteemed to be so, it was hardly possible to
conceive in what manner the funds of. a Corporation
were to be prote&ed against the improper aCts,of
the Select Body. Could it be maintained, that a
reference to an Arbiter btitween the. Select Body,
and a person who had defended an individual Alein-
brr of the Corporatioh, while ataing in his corporate
capacity, on account of some improper conduce in
the discharge of his office, and the decision of 7 the
Arbiter, that the expence incurred fell on the
Corporation, preClude the Body from applying to .a
Court of .Equity for reliet.?, Such a doctrine his
Lordship completely dented. He was of opinion,
that the decision of the Arbiter by no means varied
the Plaintiff's claim in the present instance. By one
of the authorities grained to the Plaintiff, the 'Car-
poration becathe bound, not only to pay the costs
to be incurred by the Plaintiff in defending their in-
diVidual member, while: accused .of improper con-
duCt in his official capacity : bit even to indemnify
that Member if he should be found guilty. His
Lordship asked, was that such a disposal of the funds
of the corporate body, by the seled body, as the
Court, without any regard tb the cestui 'time trust,.
could alloiti to stand ? His Lordship was convinced
it was not, He shotfd esteem it, howeVer, a whole-
some lesson to be held out to every individual Sign-
ing such an authority to a solicitor, that he hiMself
was personally bound by his order for all costs which,
on the faith of it, might be incurred. Hii Lordship
was far from being unaware of the inconveniencies
which might be produced from its being esteemed
,an established rule, that a person aging in an official
capacity was, not to be proteCted. He was well
convinced that this might have an unfortunate elle&
on the condu& of the weak and timid ; but on the.
other hand, the consequences to be apprehended
from the contrary doetrine, where the person was j
bold and ungovernable, must be mischievous in the
extreme. His Lordship was far from wishing to do
any thing-. whith Might seem to have the etre& of
deciding this case, by an .interlocutory judgment.
He, therefore, should neither enlarge nor restrld his
former order, as before, appoint the Defetuiiilts
,to pay into Court the amount of the costs incurred
ltiff the mandamus, with interest.
. ,