The Sun.
London, England, 1822-06-22 00:00:00

members of the Eliablished Church ? Have they
been deficient in disseminating doctrines of mo-
rality ? have these Sectarians attempted to,pro-
cure their followers by wealth ? have they sought
to enroll the opulent or great among them ?
Have not their Ministers 46 gone in and out"
and attended to the worthliest, most uneducated,
poorest beings this country exhibits ? Have they
not indefatigably endeavoured to reclaim them ?
Can it be denied that THEY have introduced discip-
line and order amongst the lower classes, habits
of sobriety and cleanliness ? Have they not extir-
pated gaming and inebriety in a great degree
from amongst them ? Will your, secret Corres-
pondent venture to assert, that in their institu-
tions, in the doctr;nes laid down by them, there
is any other tendency than to inculcate and render
them an enforcetnent to obedience to the Laws'
of the Country, charity to their neighbour, and
duty towards their Saviour and their God ? What
salaries do even the highest Ministers among
them receive ? Can he assert with truth the charge
of their purchasing the presentations to livings ?
Will he tell us why he calls Sectarians, " Evan-
gelical?" Finally, for I fear to intrude upon
you too much, who in the last tremendous and
awful contest between the Protestant Church
and Papal Wealth and influence here, so effec-
tually, so strenuously aided in the defeat of the
undermining and insidious machinations of the
latter. Have these Dissenters, Sectarians, or
whatever title you choose to give them, have they
applied any " ten-penny fund ?" have they had
any " O'Connor Subscription" for the purchas-
ing seats in the H- of C s, in order to
procure the subversion of the Protestant Ascend-
ancy ? Lastly, let your Correspondent remem-
ber"; hasty attacks on these subjects often prove
the severest wounds to the Established Church ;
that often they a,re given in these abuses against
" Evangelical Sects ;" it is but a cloak under
which a dagger is conveyed to the bosom of the
-Church very frequently. Let him remember to
give jostice where justice is due; not to judge of
institutions by solitary instances of their perver-
sion, but their -natural tendencies ; and lastly as-
sure him if he will dispassionately discuss the
propriety of such institutions, it will be worth
-while to attend to ilk communications ; let him

take heed,and know that either too much rash, in-
discriminate,
.or inconsiderate zeal, often ruins a
good Cause, and gives advantage to the opposing
party.

JUSTUS.

F.S. The Author, alludes to " some sliding into
.he BOSOM of the CHURCH ;" this wants explana-

ion.

LAW INTELLIGENCE.

COURT OF KING'S BENCH, JUNE 21.
CANIBRIDGE UNIVERSITY.

Mr. TIDTDAL moved for a 'rule' to Miew cause. Why a manda-
mus should not issue, to be•directed to the Vice-Chancellor of
the University of Cambridge, commanding him to admit Mr.
Jeffson to the Professorship, of Mineralogy in that University,
to which he had been elected by a majority of the Senate. The
Professorship of Mineralogy. is founded by the grace of the Se-
nate of the University, consisting of the Vice-Chaneellor, Five
Heads of Colleges, the Non-Regent, and the Regent Master of
Artg: Upon the death of The late Dr. 'Clarice, who had filled the
Mineralogical Professor's chair, the Senate enacted another grace,
whiCh is equivalent to a bye-law, and there were three candidates
for the chair, to WhiCh a kiperid of 1001. per ann. is attached, with
The usual lecturer's class fees, making the income altogether about
400]. The question was, whether the right of election was in the
heads of colleges called the Caput, or in the-general body of the
Senate ? The Caput claimed, the exclusiye right of election, and
although the majority of the Senate was in favour of Mr. Jeff-
son, the,Caput declared, that a Gentleman named Henslow was
elected, and the. Vice-Chancellor refused to admit Mr. Jeffson,
on the authority of an University Statute of Elizabeth, which he
contended vested the right of election in the Caput. The
Learned Counsel urged that it was .a question of considerable
importance to the whole of, the academical body, and he cited
3 Burr. IV, 47, as an authority to shew that:Mandamus would lie.
The COURT expressed. considerable doubt whether this was
a.case in which the writ of Mandamus would lie,. but granted
a rule to shew cause.

SUMMER ASSIZES,. 1822—WESTERN CIRCUIT.
Before Mr. Justice RICHARDSON & Mr. Justice BURROUGHS,

SoUtharnpton—Tuesday, July 16, at the Castle of Win.
chester.
Wilts—Saturday, July 20, at New Sarum.
Dorset—Thursday, July- 25, at Dorchester.
Devon—Monday, July 29, at the Castle of Exeter.
City and County of Exeter—Same day, at the Guildhall of
the City of Exeter.
Cornwall—Monday, August 5, at Bodmin.
Somerset—Saiurday, August 10, at the City of Wells.
City and County of Bristol—Saturday, August 17, at the
Guildhall of the City of Bristol.