The Sun.
London, England, 1822-08-05 00:00:00

THE MARKETS.

CORN EXVIIANGE, AuGcsT .5. -
We have a pretty good supply of new Wheats on our market
this morning, and in very good order, and of fine.quality, which
experienced. a decline of from ps. to 6s. per quarter since last
week ; old samples of the first sorts met with pretty ready sale,
at a decline of from 3s. to 4s. per quarter since this day week ;
Barley, Peas, Oats and Beans, not much in demand, and little
alteration in the price since this day week. No alteration in the
price of Flour this week.
NiTheat, Old, 46s 56s Pease, White ...........25s 30s
- New 50s 60s I Grey 22s 24s
Rye 16s 18s Beans ',2s 28s
Barley 15s 20s Oats 15s 25s
Malt 42s 46s Flour 4ss SIN

AVERAGE PRICE OF CORN IN ENGLAN'D AND WALES.
Wheat, 435. 2d. ; Barley, 18s. 44.-; Oats, 18s. 7d. ; Rye,
235. id. ; Beans, 255. 2d. • Peas, 265. 9d. • ..
The Average Price of Brown or Muscovado Sugar, computed
from the Returns made in the Week ending the 31st,4y of
July, 1822, is 31s. Old. per cwt. • . .

SMITHFIELD MARKET, Aim. S.
There was a good supply at market this morning, particu-
larly in Sheep and Lambs, but in Oxen the numbers were not
so great as on former market days, in consequence of which
they ask a higher price for Beef, but all other descriptions of
meat are the same in price as our last quotation.
Beef 2s 6d to 3s 4d Veal
I Mutton 2s 4d to 2s 8d Pork _ Os Od to Us Od
Lamb 3s. Odr -to 4s. Phi.

MARRIAGE.--The Duke de Nivernois was ac-
quainted with the Countess de Rochefor!, and never omitted go-
ing to see her a single evening., As she was a widow, and he a
widower, one of his friends observed to him, it would he
more convenient to him to marry that lady. " I have oftell
thought so," said he, "but. one thing prevents me : in that
case, where should 1 spend my evenings ?"
Twix BIRTIIS.—A poor woman named Smith,
of Stoke Doyle, near Oundle, was 18 months ago brought to
bed of twins, a fine boy and girl; and about five weeks ago she
was delivered of two fine boys ; all of them alive, and. fine
healthy looking children. The poor mother is a labourer's
wife, in great penury, but contented, and apparently happy
with these blessings of nature about her. She was so well as to
be able (stern necessity compelling her) to be up at the wash
tub the whole of the fourth day after her last delivery I
Yesterday, pursuant to a sentence of the High Court of Jus-
ticiary, Beatson, David Beatson,
,jun., and Robot.
Kay, were whipped through the streets of this city for assault-
ing and wounding two young men on the Ist of January last.
This punishment having been discontinued for 15 years, at-
tracted an immense crowd of spectators • and although the civil
power were aided by a detachment of cavalry, and 'an es-
cort of infantry, the procession proceeded very slowly down
the High-street, owing to the multitude assembled. After
the culprits had received five lashes at eight different places.Qh,
the High-street they were taken to the jail in the Calton. hil. ,
from whence they are to ,be transported beyond seas for fourteef,
years.—( Edintuirg,h Covrant, Auf. 1.)
A GREEK SLATE IN LIVERPOOL.— Cilploll
DOBSON, of the Arab, recently arrived in Liver-
pool from Smyrna, has brought with him a Greek
boy, about ten years of age, whom•he actually
purchased for eleven shillings. The youth was
sold at the common bazaar, together with ,his
mother, brothers, and sisters, his father having
been previously killed.—(Manchester Guardian.)

THE LONDQN JOURNALS.

CXTRA.F.TS PROM TUE DAIL,Y .MORNING PAPERS

August ,5, :1-812.

•
[THE TIMES.]
We communicate in another column a circum-
stance of high and ,gratifying interest to all those
humane minds which have so long deplored the
Continued and unpunished prosecution of the
Slave Trade on.the coast of,Africa.—(See TEE
SUv of this day).-LA
.}whole squadron of six
armed vessels employed :in this execrable traffic
fell into the hands of :Sir Robert Mends, being
bravely attacked and captured by the boats of
the llphigenia and Myrmidon under his orders,
Manned by about 150 seamen. No. less than 1876
miserable negroes were released from bondage and
from.the most crttel.torture, by this generous and
gallant exploit. Of these, 500 were unfortu-
nately drowned, by the upsetting of one of the
prizes in- a tornado, together with some of our
countrymen who formed the crew. But with the
• •
exception of 200 who died on the passage to
Sierra Leone, all the rest, amounting to nearly
19.00, were landed safely at that settlement.—
It is to be
,remarked, that of the Slave Traders
taken, three , were under the French flag. This
event, we trust, will throw a damp at least upon
the wicked rapacity of those who carry on this
detestable traffic.

[BRITISH PRESS.,
We do not recollect any case savouring of a
.job, that has given such general satisfaction as
the defeat of the gigligate,Chapel Bill, which,
if carried into a, law, would-in its principle have
infringed on the rights of private property,
chartered privileges,• and public charities. The
apposition to this Bill was excited, not by party
or-political feelings, -but by a due sense of the
dangerous precedent of its principle, and the in-
justice of the measure, as it had for its object the
perversion of charitable funds to purposes wholly
foreign to the expressed intentions of the donor.
The importance of the victory is, therefore, not
to be measured by the intrinsic merits of this par-
ticular case. It will produce incalculable public
benefit, by discouraging similar attempts.

[MORNING CIIRONICLE.]
Pains being taken to satisfy the world that no
important act of any of the Great Powers is
,un-
dertaken without the sanction of the whole, we
must
.of ' course presunie that the Government of
En-gland is a party to the steps which have been
taken with regard
.to Spain. We confess We are
rather surprised that no questions have been
asked' Ministers,. with a view to clear -up this
important point. Before Parliament is pro-
rogued, it would, we think, be well, at all
events, for some Member to ask them whether
they are apprised.of any circumstances that may
disturb the peace of Europe, by any Foreign
Power interfering in the internal affairs of
Spain,? Every Potentate of Europe may quake at
the,eCho of the first gun that is fired by a foreigner
against the liberties and independence of that
cOuntry.—With respeCt to another point, the
afrairs. ,of _Greece, we .are told that the determi-
nation of the Great Powers is that she. may
carry on her insurrection against the Porte,-but it
mast be by her own resources. Let us be thank-
ful even for this favour, t(..)-- whate.ver cause we
are Indebted for it. We firmly believe that the
insurrection has now gained such head as to se-
cure the
.G.reeks against the most strenuous efforts
of the Turks.

[MORNING POST.] •
At a late hour last night we received by ex-
press Paris Papers.to the 3d instant. They con-
tain intelligence from Madrid to the 9.3 d ult.
which affords additional proofs, if any were ne-
cessary, that the late rumours of a counter-revo-
lution in that Capital were Ultra fabrications.—
Voiery thing remained tranquil, and if any symp-
toms of discontent were shewn, they proceeded
from the 'Royalists, and were directed against
the King, and not against the Constitutionalists;
probably on account of the part which the
Monarch had taken against his own Guards,
when he found they were not strong enough
to carry their daring enterprise into execution.--'
For the first time since the suppression of the
late attempt, his Majesty rode out with the
Royal Family, in the evening of the 19th ult.
and was received by the people with a respect-
ful and expreysive silence." A squadron of the
voluntary militia formed his sole escort, in order,
probably, by a show of confidence, to conciliate
the favour of that body, and that of the Madrid
populace. At the moment when the Royal Party
reached. the Pnerta "del Sol, a Franciscan friar
Called out three•thnes,-with a timid voice," Death
to the Perjured." The police arrested the of-
fender for having disturbed the public order ;
but after some exPlanatien on :his part he was set
at liberty.
_

[NEW TRIES.]
We .are not quite sure of the danger to be ap-
prehended from the Spanish liberales They
have certainly gore to very crirhi-nal lengths in
encouraging treason in other countries. They
hive not-onlygiven.shelter to Cugnet de Mon-
tarlot• and' other
.French traitors flying from
justice, hot they have alloved these men, as well
as native .Spaniards, to abuse the liberty of the
Spanish Press, by wicked incitements to insur-
rection in a}l;the countries of Europe, England
not ex.cepted. In short, to use a trivial proverb,
haVe,SilffiCiently " shewn their teeth," but
we thin'k they can't bite." Very prudent
and .well-,timed, no doubt, is the advice of
The Mortthig ChroOcle to the Spaniards I At a
moment when
,a bloody civil war is raging in all
their "'provinces, and when,., with an exhatisted
treasury ru4ted fitfanees, they " have been
forced -to' decree an addition of 25,000. men to
their army for the pux-pose of ,internal defence,
they are gravely,.exhorted to break through a
cordon of 60,600 disciplined. troops on the fron-
tiers of ..krance, and. to enter that country, as.in-
vaders.i rrobably some descendant of the re.-
nownednight of La Mancha is ttme instructor of
iltornin.g.;CAr9.l44 in. Spanish

LAW INTELLIGENCE.

COURT Or CHANCERY, Auc. 3.

JUDGMENT.— THE SHIP WILLIAM FREDERICK. ,1
MOARISON J. Moonmax.
The Solicitor for the defendant requested that his Lordship
would postpone giving his judgment until he had, an opportuni-
ty of filing affidavits to contradict the statement of Dlr. Knight.
The LORD CnAsteElLon—lt is not necessary that 1 should
suspend my judgment, because the principle on which I shall
deliver it will avoid that matter. Upon the most careful consi-
deration of the circumstances of this case, it does appear to me
that this Court has the jurisdiction to interpose its authority. The
grounds on which I come to that conclusion are these, that if the
law holds the person in possession of the ship chartered for Toulon,
and also of her cargo, bound to deliver them on his arrival at
the port of destination in the one case, and in another, if in con-
sequence of distress of weather he was driven into any other
port, the law also holds, that such person is bound to deliver
it at the . intermediate port, on the payment of freight for
the whole voyage. If it were a matter of contract in the one
case and the other, I conceive this Court can by injunc-
tion restrain the party intrusted with the cargo from dealing
with it in any manner, and even enforce the delivery of it.—
In one branch in which this case divides—l allude to the ac-
tual sale—his Honour the Vice-Chancellor has granted
his injunction, restraining Moorman, the master of the
ship, from disposing of the cargo in this way, but not
from hypothecating it. Now it does appear to me, from the
statemens at the bar (taking it for granted that those
sta.tetnentts are founded on affidavits), that on the same prin-
ciple on which it was thought advisable to restrain the
sale, the hypothecation of the cargo ought also to have been
prohibited. Being extremely tenacious of breaking through
any fixed rule of this Court, I deemed it advisable carefully to
look into all the authorities I could find bearing on the case, on
that of the Gratitudine. I have had a communication on
the subject with the Learned Judge at the head of the Court of
Admiralty, who decided that case. His opinion coincides with
mine in taking a distinction between that and this case.—
The master of the vessel, in that case, had been allowed to
hypothecate part of the cargo, in order that by such a sacrifice
the, remainder might be preserved fer the benefit of the-owner;
therefore, to insure that benefit, I shall determine this case by
the converse of the former, as it is clear by the hypothecation, no
part of the cargo could here be saved, but on the contrary, such a
measure would insure the destruction of the whole. I think, there-
fore, that such hypothecation ought tobe restrained; thus in both
instances taking care of the interests of the owner of the cargo.
The order, however,will be subject to this, as this case is an ex-
tension of an injunction : I consider it will be advisable to preface
it with a declaration, which I will myself pen, in order that
the principle oh which it is founded may be perfectly under-
stood. If the circumstances of the case are not such as 1 have
supposed them to be, then, in order to shew that fact, the case
may again be brought before me; for, unless the circumstances
stated at the Bar are borne out by the affidavits, both the state-
ments and my view of the case must fall to the ground, as I
have proceeded entirely on the assumption of theirbeing facts ;
any affidavits relat've to this point, which either party may
think proper to make, ought to be filed before Tuesday morn-
ing next."

ASSIZE INTELLIGENCE.

WESTERN CIRCUIT.-EXETER, AuG. 1.

CRIM CON.—SPECIAL JURY.
SEALEY V. MOORE.
This cause, which was specially appointed for this morn-
ing, excited considerable interest. The Court was extremely
crowded, and it was with difficulty that seats could be ob-
tained for the Gentleman of the Bar. Mr. MEREWEATHER
having opened the pleadings, in which the damages were laid
at 50001. . Mr. ADAM (K.C.) stated the case to the Jury. The
Learned Counsel prefaced his address by saying, that to the
honour of the county this species of action was of rare occur-
rence.

A few females were in the gallery to hear the case and take
a peep, but there were not any on the bench, except the female
witnesses to support theaction. •
The plaintiff Charles Seeley) was a Captain in the East
India Company s Bombay Marine ; and the defendant (John
Moore) a Captain in the Company's Bombay Artillery, who
was at this present moment in England, living in open adul-
tery with the plaintiff's wife. The plaintiff had brought this
action to recover damages for one of the most serious losses a
man could sustain, namely—the loss of his wife's honour and
the society of an accomplished woman, for such was Mrs. S.
However large the damages which might be given, the Jury
could never heal the wounds his mind had suffered from this
injury—still this was the only remedy the laws of his country
had i.ointed out. The plaintiff was married to Mary Ann
Price, spinster, the daughter of a Captain in the coasting
service at Bombay, on the. 11th of May, 1812, by the Rev.
Robert Baynes, the Garrison Chaplain, according to the rites
of the Church of England. Of the fruits of that- marriage there
were three children, all girls, who left Bombay with their
mother in the year 14319, and are now at a respectable board-
ing-school at Exeter, under the immediate care of the plaintifE
The unfortunate acquaintance of the plaintiff with the de-
fendant commenced at Baroach, in India, in the year 1816,
where he was then stationed. The defendant was then Com-
missary of Stores on that station, an appointment extremely
lucrative. Mrs. Sealey was not at that time with her husband,
but remained at his house at Surat, where she shortly after-
wards was confined with her third child. In the month of
June, 1816, plaintiff left his station at Baroach, and returned
to his house at Surat, where he and his family remained till
February, 1817, when he again went to 13aroach, on the Com-
pany's service, taking with, him his wife and children. An
intituacy having previously subsisted between 'the plaintiff
and defendant, as brother officers, the plaintiff and his wife
were invited to reside at his . (the defendant's), house, and
there they remained until June, 1817, when plaintiff; his
wife, and their children, returned home. They remained
at Surat for some months, during which period - defendant
made them occasignal visits, staying three or four days at
-a time by invitations from plaintiff, who only considered ,
it a proper return for the civilities he and his family had re-
ceived from defendant while under his roof. In the month
of October, 1817, Mrs. Sealey and her three children went to
Bombay for the benefit of the children's health, Surat being
at that time considered unhealthy. The plaintiff remained as
Commodore on the Surat station till January, 1818, when he
was relieved, and immediately afterwards joined his family at
Bombay, where they all remained until the sth of March fol-
lowing, when the plaintiff again left Bombay . on the Com=
pany's service, being ordered. to cruize against the pirates on
the coast of Guzserat: He returned to his family early in the
month of .slay in that year, 1818, and during this last mention-
ed absence, defendant occasionally visited at the plaintiff's
house at Bombay. The Learned Counsel then proceeded to
read some of the letters that had passed from Mrs. Sealey to the
plaintiff during his absence, and which breathed on her part
the kindest affection towards her lord. It was not until the
defendant interfered in their happiness that their harmony was
disturbed. The plaintiff had been a most affectionate and ten-
der husband; and 'Mrs. Sealey a dutiful and kind wife, until the
-unhappy period of her leaving India for England, where she was ,
going to put her children to school at Exeter. The Captain was
a ira.ssenger on board the same vessel in which Mrs. Seeley came
over, and during her voyage she was confined with her 4th child.
The defendant had shewn particular regard to the plaintiffs wife
during her confinement, but he lamented that he could call no
evidence of their criminality, the ship having returned back
again; but he had no doubt that the Captain had made use of
all the arts he was maste of to gain the affections of Mrs.
Sealey, and which it would appear he did, and thereby de-
stroyed the happiness of his client's mind for ever. In Au-
gust, the ship arrived in. England, shortly after which the chil-
dren were
_sent to' Devonshire, and the defendant and Mrs.
Sealey went up. to London. In November, Capt. Moore and
Mrs. Sealey came to Exeter, and took lodgings at llis.Cross's,
in Fore-street, which they some time afterwards left, and went
to reside at Mrs. Jacob's, who also kept a lodging-house, in
Perris-street, Exeter, where she continued to. reside for five
weeks.
Witnesses were then called which established his case.-
Mr. Sergeant PELL addressed the Jury on behalf of his
client, in a most able and eloquent speech. No man, hesaid,
Could more deeply lament actions of' this nature than him-
, self-:nor any man More abhor the charaCter of an adulterer.
But this was a peculiar case, and to the abstract nature of
the evidence he should particularly call the attention of the
Jury. They had' heard letters read, written by the wife dur-
ing the time she lived with her husband in a state of harmony;
but they were not,,in proof, and could therefore, not be legally
received in evidence. His Learned Friend had been misled in
' fact. - In the early period' of 'our history, the actual fact of
adultery • was all but necessary to be proved. Lord 'Kenyon
bad held a slight proof to be sufficient ; but with that doctrine
he never could nor ever wotild agree ; and experience hid
shown, in a thousand instances, that tie-was right. Slight proof
in this case would not do ; it must be.positive. The .Learned
Sergeant then dwelt minutely on the evidence that had been of-
fered, and partieularly on that ofJane Paul, a discarded servant;
and who, by her own admission, had not been" in.service since.
She of all others was the last to be believed. She had stated all
the doors to have been locked, but why net have called Mary
Baker, the nurse Who slept with the mistress? Had the plain-
tiff's Counsel dared to do so ? Should, however, the Jury think
the plaietiff entitled to a verdict, damages otherwise- than no-
minal' must be out of the ques ion. The plaietiffhad left his
wife to the oare 'of another person, without the means of pre-

tecting her, and transplanting her out .of one soil into another,
like an outcast in society.
The Learned JUDGE, insumming up, noticed the very able
speech of his brother Pell for the defence. But as regarded the
rule of evidence, that would depend upon circumstances. The
Jury must draw their owstonclusions ; for it was not because
the actual fact had not been proved to denwnstration, that a cri-
minal intercourse had not taken place. If the Jury believed the
evidence it was impossible not to believe that such was the
fact. The very fact of the defendant and Mrs. Sealey having
been seen only six weeks before the trial together in a gig, was
in itself convincing proof. It was not because Mary Baker, the
nurse, was not called, that that should militate against the
plaintiff's case. Counsel have a discretionary power which they
know how to exercise. In conclusion; the Learned Judge ob-
served, that as to damages, that question must obviously be
left to the judgment of the Jury. It was a recognized princi-
ple, that what a man could not pay in his purse he must in his
person.
The Jury consulted together for a short time, and returned a
verdict for the plaintiff.—Damages 1,0001.

NORTHERN CIRCUIT.-YORK, AUGUST 1.
QUACK DOCTORS.-SPECIAL JURY.
THE APOTHECARIES' COMPANY V. BASTON._

Mr. SCARLET T stated that this was an action upon the sta-
tute .55th of the late King, at the instance of the Apothecaries'
Company in London, to recover three different penalties
against the defendant, fdr practising as an apothecary without
first obtaining a certificate. The Learned Counsel observed,
the object of the Act of Parliament in subjecting such prac-
titioners to penalties, was for the purpose of preventing un-
skilful, ignorant, and unlicensed persons from imposing on
the public. This act being framed in 1815, restrained the
practice of an apothecary, without first obtaining a licence
from the Apothecaries' Company ; did not attach to persons
so practising before the Ist of August, 1815, but from and
after the passing of this Act. "What notion could the Jury
form of the pretensions to skill in this defendant from
the education he had received, unless it could be said that hav-
ing served his apprenticeship to blacking §hoes, and being
errand boy in an apothecary's shop, that this could qualify him
to prescribe. But such was the case, that with no better in-
troduction to the study of medicine, this defendant carried on
the business of an apothecary in the town of Halifax. It would
appear from witnesses, that the history of the defendant was
this. In 1807, being then of the age of thirteen, he was hired
as a stable-boy to a gentleman of the name of Priory. After
leaving his service, in" 1810, he was apprenticed to a card-
maker, with a Mr. Gouldthorp ; having remained a year or
two as apprentice, he next worked there as a journeyman card,
maker; and being an industrious lad, could earn 14s. a-week,
bat not satisfied with that, he enlisted for a private soldier, and
having served in that capacity until 1820, he obtained his dis-
charge, and all of a sudden sets himself up in Halifax to prac-
tise as an apo hecary.
John Priory examined by Serjeant HurAmcs—Knows Dr.
Baton` by sight.
Mr. SCARLET T—You look as if you had been under his
care, pray look up.—(Laughter.)
Witness was some time under his care, about the latter end
of 1820. He lived at a place called Lily-lane, Halifax. Wit-
ness's complaint was a kind of consumption. He went to his
house and shop ; these were all in one. He asked witness
what ailed him. They called him Dr. Baston. The Doctor
gave him some medicine to take.
What was the name he gave it ?—The last thing he gave
witness to take he called it morning honey. Then there was
another called evening honey. He had different doses for even-
ing, morning, noon, and night.—(Laughter.)—One dose last-
ed nine or ten days: It was in bottles. Witness caught up a
stick, and shewed the size of the phial. The Doctor made out
a bill, and witness's master paid the money.
Cross-examined, by Mr. Hour, for the defendant.—Did
you not receive benefit from the medicines you took ?—Not
at all.

Dr. Baston (at Mr. HOLT'S elbow) to the witness.—Recol-
leet you said so.
Mrs. Mary Mitchell—Applied first to Dr. Jordan. Her
daughter was ill. She applied next to Dr. Baston, the defend-
ant. He desired her to get some of the best brandy to give the
child. He did not mention the quantity, only to give tea-
spoons full morning and night. The child did not get any
better. The defendant then 'ordered vinegar and mustard.—
( Laughter. ) -
Did he say nothing about a plaster.?.—Yes, a plaster of honey
to her stomach, and then four powders.
Mr. HOLT—Did you pay him any thing ?—No.
Joseph Morton got one bottle of medicine from Dr. Baston,
who told witness his was an inward complaint—the liver.
Took him up stairs, where witness saw bottles and other things.
It looked a little-bit like a doctor's shop. Gave witness a
bottle, did not say how lie called it, only it was very good to
take. Did not take all; has some of it yet. The defendant
charged him at first is-6d. and 6d. afterwards, making 2s.—
Witness before he applied to him had heard he was a skilful
man, and had performed many cures.
Mr. Prior, an apothecary at Halifax, remembered the de-
fzndant's being engaged as errand-boy to witness's father.—
He used to attend the stable, black shoes, and run errands.
His parents, day labourers, lived at Brighouse. He could
read, but witness did not know if he could write. He left in
1810, when he went to work with Mr. Gouldthorp ; understood
he afterwards enlisted as a soldier.

Cross-examined by Mr. HOLT—The defendant was not em-
ployed to mix up medicines, but for hard work. He never
made up prescriptions at witness's father's shop. He might
have assisted the witness in working the pestle and mortar.
Mr. Gouldthorp, card-maker, at Halifax.—The defendant
became his father's apprentice in 1810. He continued until
1815 ; he could earn 14s. a week as journeyman card-maker,
less or more ; remembers people inquiring for him previous to
1815, at witness's father's shop, understood that he did a little
business for them in the way of medicine. Witness believes he
himself once took some medicine of him.
What medicine ? A bollus.
Mr.. SCARLE T T—Are you sure it was not part of a tom-cat g
—No.—( Laughter.)
Mr. HOLT addressed the Jury for the defendant, and called
the following witnesses:—
James Briggs knew the defendant from a boy: In the early
part of 1815 saw him give medicines.
Dr. Baston to the witness—Now recollect yourself.
• CHIEF JUSTICE--I desire you will be quiet, Sir, and not
dare to interrupt.
Witness proceeded—The defendant attended two little girls
of his, and ordered them to be rubbed with something ; their
disorder was the ring-worm ; they recovered.
Cross-examined—Defendant was at that time a journeyman
card maker, or an apprentice; he had no shop.
Another witness, named Mallison, deposed to being at the
defendant's shop in 1814 ; he had in it a stone mortar and some
bottles ; he was said to have cured many people of the ring-
worm.

Mr. SCARLET T—You never heard that he gave his patients
any roast cat? . No.
The Jury having found for the plaintiffs,
Mr. SCARLET T-agreed to take a verdict upon one count only,
subjecting the defendant to one penalty of 201. and costs, in-
stead of three penalties of 201. each.
leagoinatmeeses •fflemsenswassomm

FUNERALS.—Oa Saturday, at three o'clock,
the remains of the late Countess of GLASGOW
were interred in a vault under Marylebone
Church, where the remains of her son, who died
about three years since, were buried. The Earl
of GLASGOW followed as chief mourner,
tt accom-
panied by the Earl of EaoL, Colonel and Major
FITZCIARENCE. The funeral procession from
Knightsbridge was very plain. The Duke of
CLARENCE'S carriage followed in the train.—
Yesterday, morning, the remains of Mr. Baoos-
CHOFV, Deputy Marshal and Clerk of the Rules
of the Court of King's Bench, were interred in a
vault in St. George's Church, Southwark. The
mourners were numerous.

FIRE.—On Saturday evening, about 9 o'clock,
an alarming fire broke out at Mr. JOHNSON'S,
corn-dealer and agent to the County Fire-office,
in the London-road. Although jhe engines were
very prompt in their attendance, no water could
be procured, and the house was totally consumed
before they 'could be brought into action. The
Alfred's Head public-house was in great danger;
but strong party-walls prevented the flames
spreading on either side ; and we are happy to
say no further damage was sustained beyond the
destruction of the house at which it commenced.

SUDDEN DEATH.—Saturday morning, at T rump-
ington, near Cambridge, a fine young woman,
named MARY JOHNSON, aged 20, on getting up,
went to her sick mother in the next room, and
with a grateful and elevated voice exclaimed
cc Mother, what a heavenly morning !" and then
retiring, dropped down and died.

COUNTRY MARKETS ,AND FAIRS,

DURING THE LAST WEEK.

LIVERPOOL CQRN EXCHANGE, July so

The weather during the week has been very ungenial for
the growing crop, and its fickleness tended to,raise or depress
prices, as it varied from wet to•fair. The importations were
rather heavyi particularly at so advanced a period.of the sea-
son. About 1200 quarters of the Wheat were from Canada,
and go, in consequence, into bond. The market was very
poorly attended, and nothing extensive was transacted.—
Only prime samples of Old and New Wheat were saleable
at our former quotation ; the middling and inferior sorts
were quite neglected. Barley and Malt were nominally as on,
this day se'nnight. To have sold Beans less pikes must have
been submitted to; and the few Oats that could be got rid of
were at a reduction of Id per bushel. Nothing doing in bonded
Corn.
Wheat, English,Old
New ss Od a 78 Od
Ditto sound 7s Gd a tis 3d
scotch, Old Bs 3d a 8s 9d •
Foreign (in bond) Os Od a Os Od
Irish, Old
New
Barley, English, Old
New
Irish, Old
New
Scotch, Old 3s Od a 3s 4d
New
Oats, Potatoe, Old
New 2s 5d a 2s 9d
Limerick, Old 2s 10d a 3s od
I,New
Welsh, Potato,Old is tOd a 3s Od
Malt, Fine ..
Ditto, middling 6s od a Gs 6cl
Beans, Old
New 26s Od a 32s Od
Superfine Flour, Old 18s Od a 40s Od per 2401b5.
New 36s Od a 38s cid
Oatmeal, OH 27s Od a 28s Od
New
American Flour, sweet, (in bond), 26s Od a 30s Od per barrel
of 191 11)s. net.—Sottr..(out of bond), 333 a 355.
Import of Grain for the Week ending July 29.
Wheat Barley Oats I Flour I Scks Irish.
Bsb. 70lbs. Bsh. 601hs. Bsh. 451bs. Am.Brls. per 3401b5.
40,200 1870 23,630 1520

CHESTER, July 27.
Wheat, per quarter, Winchester measure, 35s tid—Barley,
—s ed—Oals, —s Od.

NAN rwicii, July 27.
Wheat, per 75 lb. 6s 9d a lOs Od—Barley, 38 qts, Os Od a
Os Od—Oats, Os Od a Os Od.

CANTERBURY, July 27.
I Wheatßrown.... :35s a 45s Ticks
White.... 44s a 15s Hog Pease
--- New ..... —s a—s Boiling Pease
Rye . —s a—s Flour
Barley ' , 16s a 21s Hay, per ton
Oats
Beans ' 18s a 23s Straw

23s a 25s
43s a 25s
24s a —s
88s a 47s
45s a 55s
50s a 60s
40s a 00s

MAIDSTONE, July 26.
Wheat, Red 4os a 46s Beans, Tick .... 18s a 22s
-- White 44s a 62s 5ma11.... 22s a 26s
Barley
Oats l6s a 20s Boiling . 24s a 28s
Price of Oil Cake at Toni Mills, 81. ss. per Thousand.
', July 26.

TENTERDE:

Wheat Red 4os a
--- White sos a
Barley '... lBs a
Oats lBs a

50s
56s
2ls
20s

Beans
Pease White
- Grey 2is a 24s

CAMBRIDGE, lu
Wheat
Rye
Barley

ly 27.—Average.
Oats
Peas
Beans

HuNTINGDO.
Wheat .... 23s Oa .a
3ls Od
Barley 15s Od a 29s od
Peas

,x, July 27
I oats l4s Od a IBs Od
Beans
Od.

WoacEsTER, July 27.
Wheat, .... Ss 9d a Ss 4d I Oats
Bailey .... Is 6d a 3s Ot! I Beans 3s 2d a 4s 8d
Pease
YORK, July 27.
•

The supply of Wheat to-day was small; fine samples is to
2s per quarter higher. In Rye, Barley, and Oats, no alt era-
, ion. Beans dull sale, at is to Qs lower.
Wheat
Rye
...

Beans
BAtn.

Wheat - 36s a
Barley

64s Oats, IS, a 26s
25s 1 Beans . 3os a 365

BRisToL.

Wheat 249 a 64s Oats
Barley