The Sun.
London, England, 1809-03-18 00:00:00

given the other a negative with greater pleasure. He
rather wisliN the 'Hop. Baronet would witlidral.v it.
the Hon. Gentleman cnnrjptfetiA expressing hts 693-
.
titude for the patient attention with. which be
been heard. _ _

considered to be one of the many Palliamentnry
rtes anide use of in the present day'. lii fat, •hiss
gunge left him no ground: to mod on, with re•
et to censure or any tort her matter 3 and- hi had
tir..wnaand persevered in a conclusion not to be de-

'Mr. StrrTriN\diii nut approve of the Hon. Ginle-
man's ideas of • passing a settpral, ambiguous censure
On the Duke, as the unintiamed would apply the
censure -Where it,ought not to be applied; he would
wish the House to consult its digniiy, and nut hastily
blast a character by such a procedure. It' had been
said in the course of the discu,,sion, such evidence
as is insisted on in a Court of Justice was not to by
required there ; whatever difference there,mightbe,
in sortie respects he conceived the evidence o: an'aC-
cotnplice there, as'in a Court of JustiCe,- should be
'received with caution; and when a witness, in toe
courw of various examinations, gave cuntradtcaory
statements, be thonght that peisUn's testimony
should be do9bied.
Mr. DICKENSON
.spoke a few words; but from
the increasing tumult, tro:Ad not be distinctly heard;
he had been mucnopposed in his election; and was
determined to let his constituents see he was not
neglectful of his duty, by voting according to the
dictates of his Colli,:trnee. .• • • •

duced from his own premises. He was of opinion
I..:tt there way no necessity for either an Address to
the Throne, or any further Resolution being entered
of the proceedings of the Hohse. He concluded by
stating it' to he. his intention td vote against the Hon.
Rootlet's Artmnchnent.
Sir I', TURTON, in explanation, said, that as the
Hori'.'• Gentleman WhO had just sat down had urged
mibther ohjecnor,s against.the Amendment Which he
had, proposed, than the complexity of the Retolu
tioa subinitted by the Right Huu. Gentleman oppo-
site,' he certainly did not feel them stifficiently co-
gent to induce him to miithdraW it.—(liejSeated cries
of' rieslion! yuestion!)
Lord H. PEITY moved for an adjournment, in
conseque&e of the palpable indisposition of the
the H.,use to do their duty: ' ' -
The CHANCkLLOtt of the EXCHEQUER said, he
was aware of the motive which actuated the Noble
Lard to triose an adjournment of the cle)itte 3 bet he
tr,isted fiat' the House would not) now: that it was

Mr. FuLL.KIt said, he would not trespass much approaching to a close on a material part, he 'did not
on their time, lie thought it his diity to speak his mean to say the whole of this important affair,' give,
sentiments on the subject; but he hail peen twitted the country reason to suppose that it bad terminated
in a strange sort of ruzoiner, having had tetters and in confusion. They find hitherto preserved a grate
things soot hiM,: saying, if he did not vote so and and respectable character in their' deciiions, he
,so, •he was a blackguard fellow. Those on the oppo- ! trusted now that it would nut be forfeited, but that
.side, at the set out, thought it a bad cause; he the house would, manifest Its temper to be una.
thought lie should have got himself knocked down : abated. If Gentlethen came to a se:ions consi.
by one 'of them, for when he hinted Itfai the peer-' cteration 'On the' sullied, •be ;,ad no doubt but it
son he alluded to, tavutir:d the chdre,cs—" What do , would be untivceSsaly.to 'negative the motion of the.
yeiu rhea+, ty that ?" was thundered out. But now, • IlOole Lord.
atter a few lying witnesses had been • brought tor- Lord H. PETTY is reply, said, that the Right
ward, aided by the popular clamour, they were tiy• HOh.'Gentleinan perfectly iiiikeueeived the nititives
ing with all their torte, to cry siOWn the wan who which induced him to the 11106011 he bad proposed. •
had carried the glorY of their, arms into eyery part of 4,1 r. Wurrsua.r• wits of opinion that the ?;:r...
the 'World. They (allied of corruption,' why lie re- stmal fatigues of the Speaker vi ere shot) as should
inert:thenld tbeitine whet% Butchers and Bakers, and not be augmented.
every.shahby fellow were gaining promotionl in the • 'Dig Al•.,tion at Adjournment being put and be-
arivv. whi:e now they were alt six:akin; against the gative4,
prdrni_li:3A of the •on of a gallant' Otiiter, who had is+tr. HipiaEßr coutinuect his ohservzitions.—lie
a in tigoting their battles. 'The I)uke,in whaed that the House, it' they (;-ete desiiotis of
his opiiiion, had tidied with great humantiy, amid coming to a tlktiud Vote, would he cautiousbf
cans•: pia had atted so, Gehtlemen would reeve bun from one proceeding inadvertently into another:
like a Whale, send him 'out as it were with a has:pepn He would be extiernelrglad that. the Hon. Baronet
ii: bun Sonnebody had talked of die last would` withdraw his Amendment, in order to give
lle.s,ipposed they meant to insinuate the dissolu- an opportunity for negativing the Resolution of the
no iof Parliament Was at band. For his part, he would Chancellor of the Exchequer.

,T,:att hi mind, which was the prerogative ()fa Britian
to do, " and ho who don't like England," said Mr.
Fuller, " d—o hint; let hiio ieave it." Here. the
Hon Gentlearail was 011ecIto order; be then said
the words he hacr!stipken were a toast which he had
heard give?) in some public con,pany, he hied uttered
them betbre he war aware, and was Sorry the Speaker
had occasion to call hint to order.
Lord 4. HAstttToN spoke, but his voice wa.a
drowned by the Members calling for the question.
Lord MoaPETti said, in his opinion, neither cor•
ruptien nor connivance, had been proved. Mrs:
ciarite..had committed herself in several instances al
their Bar he °thought her entitled to little credit,
and gave\ hit decidenrnatire to the Aniendtuent.
A Member, whose name we could not discover, •
offered some 'observations iii eiciilpation of the
Dukt ot York from tithe' perional cotiopttoo or
crituinel corini'vance.
Mr. Trtscny, in rising to addresi the House,
said, that he did so, not through arrogance, or any
desire.to trespass much On the debate,which had been
already so .long protracted." He strongly deprecated
what had gone abroad with respect to inAnumions
said to be .! ade in the Howie, nut only ataitist the,
'Duke of York, but the Family on the 'Throne alto-
-I,ellier, It was, he said, H. false and mischievous
assertion, and he trusted would 'be disregarded by
.the country as such. TO the Honourable Gen-
tleman who brought forward the charges it was his
opinion that not only the Tit.inki ut the Hduse,
*but of the Country, were deservedly due. Flom
the letters*, of Captain Bandit) and Gen. Claming,
which' (as .the Hon. Member termed:4), were pro-
Auced at the shrine of insulted honour,. he could not
)agitate in thinking that 114 Itoiallliglinesi must
have been perlitaly aware,that the perions tor whonr
Mrs. Clarke made application, were wholly uncon-
nected with her in every other' view than interested
motives on her part.—(Loud sirs frequent cries of
Question ! (ittesiion ! hdraW, withdraw 1)
had been said by an lionout,ible Gentlerrtau, that tiro
Commander in Chief was perfectly indifferent in pe-
cuniary transactions. But what did the plain and
ntiadtilterritt-4 case of Kennet t provelDid it not
Monstrate %he contrnry inihfferclice in tilo,e oral-
ters, .when his Royal highness could stoop to such
a LIMP as !fry , for pecuniary 4-sowers ? He vvas of
, opinion eiltirely, that cent* muir have exibted
on this partspf the Cornmapdcr in Cbiel•
• • Mr.: BANK ES said, t bat. Were it not for the rrcrn-
sition in6de by the Honourable' Baronet
Tutton), he should not poiNbly have offered himself
at this moment to the consiuvratiou of the House.

Mr, Eeeisoe said, from the exhausted state, of
the House, it w4s not his wish to delay its attention
very look. lie had attentively read end Considered,
the evidence and proceedings in the case which
formed. the subjed of debate, and he felt it his
bountlee
,duty to state it ae, his full convidinn, that
the testimony which
;had beet) addeeed, thpugli net
eln oath, was-soeittls ouglit to be decided upon. He
liad no deubt -in his mete of
,the Duke's gem e$ to
eounivtnce, from the evideece of Mrs. Clarke`, con-
fleeted in every point as it. was, step by step, with
several neeteriel documents. It would be missspend-
leg six wet•ks, if they did not wine to a decision
upon such evidence. Much may be sail of the tank
at the accused, but it teas ae reason for
niquiry epee great' Perstetages who had dune great
wrong. it NVaa his wish that Princes shuuld bc made
to blew!! as tteCaS them. He felt a atrong con-
vielien of the guilt of his Royal Highness as to the
charge of teninivance. •
Sir C. Bt.!' 11111.1. mentioned something of .an im-
plieatiett against the Accuser in tins-question by the
Chancellor- of the Exchequer. He did not, how-
ever, mean to vote with the Hon. Baronet.
The Gfeeteeeteeptt of the EXCpaouitt explained,
and entered into a.discussion upon the words " reo
grounds " and " tbere are grounds," as contained
in his Revelation, and'in the e. Address of th
Mover.
§eteieste expressed his intention not to vote:
.with the Hon. Baronet. He was for separating
both the cltarges as themetter on which they were
founded' distinete 'He was certain that
bra Royal fiietinees statist have connived; but-in this
he 4id nut mean to include a charge of that sordid
conOivettee which consisted in a participation of its
fruits.
Mr. WitagarottoE requested to know of the
Hon. Baronet; whether he ipay not as Well have ex-
Pressed his general sense in an 'ain'teeltnent to any
subiequent reselution of the Right 'Hoii. Gentleman
opposite ?
Lord H. Peeve felt the necessity of explanation
Nib every Member, as to -the vote he would give
on this occasion.. reeling, as he did, the situation
which had be»tr iitfeitOy ii%Ctib(4l Whittle he thought
it itecess..ry to avow the reasons which induce& him
to vole es ere would en the present qUestiore Much
'mt he wished tor the acqu i : ial of . the Duke of York,
from the respect and gratitude which were dee,to
,family, in which were centered every hope and
every memory of worth and independence, .yet. he
felt 4to striallauxiety in being oeliged to negative the
jeloposiities of the Riot Hon. eieittletnari opposite,
Instead of the Hon. Baronet's having 'proceeded in ; and others erroneouelphed insisted on the necessity
what he would have considered to be the propel' line, eof a judicial decision. In his opinion a judicial dect-
namely, to negative the Reito' lutionof the It gilt I-loti. eion, or result, wOuld he ineousistent, uot..only with
the Chancellot of the Exchequer, he had prietesed the Imene and usages of Parliament, but also with
an amendment to it, and had thus reduced thein to the advantages which the people should derive tem
a very distressing .ittiat:on, insomuch as that.'he it. He weettxtreniely surprised at expreseiens wtich
elthost precluded. the possiblitY of their knowing had tailen from tientleitketi learned in the law,
how in vole. He would new state the ilICOIA• ; the course of this debate... If levy did not enlighten
venietice which oft his part at least would result. In', the subject, he expetted they Would net obscure it,
consequence of negativing the Hon. Baronet's They spoke of a verslio ; what, he would ask, had
Amendment, which ho felt obliged to do, he would a verdiet to do with the cot: It he was erroneous,
be under the neceasity.of embracing the Right Hon. he shared, he believed, iii the error with the Con-
Gentlemau's Resolution, which he felt totally disin- i ideation. No ehatiele* were imposed on their) as on
dined to do. That there was no other alternative minor brandies of the Legilatitre. Though he
he took the liberty of stating front superioe autho brought to the consideratioil of this subjed as muelt
rity to his owe. In the Amendment of the Hon. deliberant-a) as he conceived to he necessary, yet be
Baronet, no diatmdion between crninivance and cri- eneant not to apply it as 'a Judge er zi Juror, but as a
minality had been made : tie was of opinion that Member of Perliarneet, concerned not in the ques-
there should. It was dangerous to confpunid the tiun c,t puniihment,, but, in the protettion of flit;
gradation of vices. According to logic and common publiC sitlety. It was not hie,olljett to punish the
sense both were totally distind. 11e ohjetied to the person coneiCted of Sue], offences, so much as to
Right f lon. the Chancellur,of the'Etchequer's Ile. defend the Public from-their' repetition. He could
solution, on the ground of its cotrodelife'.' It wt4liki not believe the ateY. Member could !ay I•6s kind on
be particularly necessary, he cotecelVd, ror the Hon.. his leeirt tail sey that there esesied no eieeme, eer.
Member who propirsed the Ainendmetit to reinfake i the reitioVal of the cutteoeniler in Chief. Ho look.
that not having milked the necessary ditiottiori,.bt4 ett on the evidence, etipported as it wai by strote;
tween connivance and corrupi6n ii w4ncto trap his docuti*tee,'aslierfetely coMpetenetoground ci cause
°wit foundation, for It took away the Aims ofdeduc- : ler emir removish "Jti every 'inetence where
ing a fair conclusion on the subjeet. What his Right nectessary, those documents were brought fare rd,
Hon. Friend had said, of intending to fellow up tins and ether...were ..uiwoutradided. On she ingefiislbes
matter on other
.consideraticAvs, lie (Mr. Daukus) 0443,00 which had been:set up by the Right Hon.