The Sun.
London, England, 1809-06-19 00:00:00

'COURT OF KING's BENCH, ju:,:a 17.

. „
GRAiqARE V. Di VALOR.
The Defendant having qbtained a i;11e, called up-
On the Piaintiff to.shew cause,
,why a vertlicl of 201:
dmnagcs, which he had obtained for medical aSsist•
once afforded to the Defendant,' shbnld not., be set
aside. The Plaintiff was,not a surgeon, and by se-
veral A6s of Parliament a'penalty of 51. a month was
imposed on all prisons praCtising, as surgeons with-
out being admitted into that profession, for the
whole time they had continued it) pra&ice. it was
contended that although the Plaintiff was trot a SM.
von, yet having bought articles for the Defendant,
who had no money,, and dressed him in a manner
distina from the business of a surgeon,. be had a
right to maintain his: action for money paid, laid out,
and expended, as well as for work and labour.
Lord ELLENBOROUGII observed, that tici evidence:
had been. givsn at, the trial to prove that the Plaintiff
Was not a sulgcon.---Aule discharged.

UNDERILILL V WALFORD.
This was a rule- which had been obtained' by Mr.
Garroa, to spew cause why the verdia obtained in
this bine should nut be set aside, and a new trial had,
on the gn.und that a person of the name of flaw -
kilts, whom the defendant had not been able to snb-
pccna, but who had been seen in theliall just be-
',ire the trial cofnmenced, and Whom he intended to
exatnii,e a% a wiinelig, had bcen sku.denly taken
away' by the party Oh! -other side, and amused
watt► di hiking t he trial wasp r. It be* proved
that the per.t.,u :n gitegion Was. a-Madrmin; just es-
caped from his, lccepei , and wht eanie-afier_his
that IFid silbpCerthed 23 4-WitarSi., Lord Ellenu
boroVi ordered that ft.e ruie bee enlarged, in order
that thtl plain.tiffiihottld have an opportunity of 4A.
milting the man, should he recover his faculties;
ati&ilia(iti "the mean time the money claimed by the
actions be brought into,,Court within Km' days, else
the rule to be discharged.

cow( r OF :CHANCERY; lutrz t 6.

lIARRIS PASMORE.

Thies was an .application on the part of, an infant
to have the Re.ceiver upon his estate removed on ac-

count of . mi'sconduat.

Sir S. ROMILLY stated the case on the part of thO
Plaintiff, and read several affidavits from the tnother

of the Plaintiff and others,. setting forth the extra-.
tro:Wary negleCt of the Receiver,. a Mr. Tretnanger;
who had suffeied the infant's estate to be dilopidated
sqc) plundered to a very
,considerable.. amount,- not
leis than abtlut"2oool. as. was alleged. An action,
it'appeared, had been brought against a Mr. New-
' ton, who acted.under the Receiver, and•whO bad s'af-
t. fered this dilapidation to take place, and a yercli6t
• of 6001. dainageshad been obtained by,the infant,
which, owing to the case not ,having .been com-
pletely before the Jury, was said to be far below the
attuat damage sustained, •
Mr. R.ICI:IARDS and Mr. MARTIN for the Receiver,
Tremanger, rested his defence upon The ground that
.be.had placed implicit confidence in NeWton, .and
that the waste of the estate had been efreflecl yvith-
,. out his,knowledge. He had no objeel, however,.in
continuing to act as Receiver; and his only`nuitive

tar deteticlrig was, that he might not be removed
without doing justice to !di own chara6tcr.
The LORD CHANCELLOR observed, that.tlie ponies
eat-ire-near each other when the Receiver consented
to resign, quid an order'inigtit be drawn up to that
etfedi
ROMILLY observed, that the removal of the
~. Receiver, in any way, Was all that could be required.
on the. part Of the, infant ; but.on public grounds,
and for the'salce of other suitors in that Court, he
contended warmly that Mr. Tremanger ought not
fo -be allowed to resign, but that` ire ought to be dis-
mi,bud. There could 'not, he said, be a stronger
case of misconduct on the part of a Receiver. A
wood-of his Own,. its the inutiediate neighbourhood

Of that of the infant, had been well taken dare of.—
The property of the one was the.latnily child—that
of' the other, the pat ish apprentioe, The Receiver
must have observed this.:
Tho LORD CHANCELLOR desired the Receiver,to
pay all the costs, and directed the Order to be drawn
up, as discharging him.

JUNE 17•

EX•PARTE BOULTON.

-This vtnia an application du the part of the Bank-
rupt, Rotolo°, ,to have the Commission buperseded,
on the around of ":I\lo Truier,," &c.

Mr. HART stated, that the petitioner had former
ly employed a Mr. Sowerby, an Attorney at ktich-
Mond, The Attorney iient in his bill, amounting to
front 4601. to 'tool. which• the petitioner thought
exorbitant, and therefore insisted on its being tax-
ed. This the Attorney requested of him not to do,
ofFering,to refer the matter to any Gentlemon of the
Petitioner's own choosing. The Petitioner acceded ;
but softie delay haring arisen from a circemstance
not material, Mr. Sowerby sued out i cominiision
of ba4rnpi against the Petitioner, who was a farmer
in Yudtahire, under the notion that he Was a cattle-
dealer.- The question, whether he was a tradir un-
der thls Bankrupt Laws, had been argued before
the Court of King's Bench, and de.cidedin the ne-
gative, .
Mr. litctiAttras and Sir S. ROMILLY stated that
this was a mere mistake of the law on the part of the
Attorney; and that he 'had • reasonable ground for
aeling ai he did.

. _ The LORD CHANCELLOR thought this do-very
proper case for granting relief, • the Attorney having.
been the.petitiUning creditor, the Solicitor under the
doinmission, and the Aisiance. He ordered the
Commission to be superseded, and the'Attoroey to
pay the costs.

On Wednesday the uth inst, was married, ,at
dlasbury Church; Breeonhire, ;ftIyNNE
GWYNNE, Esq. Only surviving son of THY'NNIZ
Howe GLVY NNS, Esq. of
,Flucklaild, Breconshire,
to the liOn. GaottotANA I‘,IAttIANA " DaVEIIEUX,
791,20V,tt daughter 01 the late, and Sister to the pre-
Setit Viscount HRItEPOUD. Immediately alter the
ceremony, the happy pair set off for Lord Halm-,
Poan's house, in lieretordsitite, where. they are to
pass a few days.

dim litcblished by WI LLIAM' ARMIG ft SCRIPPS, South hi
LCoN DON t p'rime'd by RICHARD HARRIS, of No. 4, khartit.roirt, Bow.:street
At Om NO* 12, Strsudi whitgitlawrgiwnisms; orikrs tc>r tte Paper, Letters for the editor, &c. (post-puio), n

t ov...street, C; ro t-sqvarr';
ttlSt b Z61'.:1:55ed.