The Sun.
London, England, 1809-02-23 00:00:00

Cl. When you saw the role or sersp 0C papor":
.did yotr'believe it Wll3 ft rged or genuine ?—A.lti
lily opinion it was the Of the Daze of •
York, ;nactl did not think it was IOW&
G. Are you ..acquaintzd with the'.l.uke of 'Voles:
writing never write, I received trio
letters, which I believe tollie hisliand-Writing,t 'and
.have _seen his hatid,writinwtotticially—to
doi:uments.

Q. Did you desire Captain &peen no( to destroy
the ,note l--.A. Certainly.-
Q. When you connunuited ,the circumstance to
Mr.. Adam, did you believe the mote vasAn
encei—A. Judging from whnt;took plaCe, and the
conversation I had with him, 'I look it for granted
the note was not destroyed. .
14. The witness has stated, that he, before'he
went to the .British. Coffee-house, had an interview
with the Chancellor of the Exchequer; At. what period
did that interview,take place )—A. After My return
to me. Adam, .he-detiitCli communicate every
thing i knew to the. Chancellor of the Exchequer, in:
Downing-street.
Q. Was:that previous to the witness's first visit to
the British Cotlee4touse.?—A. It was.
Did wit► ess ever communicate to Mr. Adam,
or the Chancellor of the Exchequer, that the note'
Was destroyed ; and if so, when i—A. had 'no
'coalman ical ion, either personally, or in writing, with
'.the Chancellor of the EXchequer, after the 'Morning
that I have alluded. to. With respect to. Mr. Adato,
I dttnot recollect whether or not I had any pesooal
communication with hitn'on the subject; but I eer..
tautly took moans to inform him of it.
Q. Then the witness never saw the Chancellor Of
the Enchequer prior to his going first to the British
Coffee-house Never, but accidentally. I had.
no communication with him.
a. What indu,':ed the wthiess to seek communica-
tion with the Chancellor of the Exithequ'cr when he
did so
Ort the motion of ?Ir. RAT HURST, the witness was
ordered to withdraw.

Alt% BATHURST then represented, that to a similar
question the witness had already given a distinct an- ,
swor—that lie was desired by Mr.. Adam to call on
the Chancellor of the EXehequer..
The witness was again called in. ,
Q. 13y Mr. ii.o.Aß—Does the witness recollect a
slwrt conversation WhiCll he had with me on the
• subjedt?.--Yes..
• Q. Doh he recolleft stating to sue that.Cotain
Sanden had inforthed him lie bad destroyed the note?
do.
Q. By Lord FoutsroNa7-=When did the wit-
ness f7trst hear of the note at all In the lost
conversatioo which .1 bad with Captain Saudeu ott
the subjea.
state what passed, on that occasion
Captairr Sanden told, me he had seen by the news-
papers that his Hattld was introduced in tlie- inquiry
before the House 'of Commons, and he begged to
consult me, as his Colonel, on the line of (=dila
which he ought to pursue en the occasion, that I
might the better
,adviSe him ; he entered' into a de-
tail of the transactions in which he had been engag-
ed, and which were connected with the subject of
that impiry. That detail to the best or my recollec-,
tion I will repeat to the Committee.
[Colonel Hamilton here related., at considerable
length, the Circumstances as given in evidence by
Captain Sandra his examination, and as stat-
ed by the Chancellor of the Exchequer in his narra-
tive.] •r: . .
On the motion or Lord FOLKSTONE the witness
was ordered to withdi•aw.

Lord For.s.suivAs then informed the
.ffouse, that
ho had just received a letter tram Mrs, Clarke,
stating that.she Was in attendance; that she ,4.vits very
much indtsp.oaed; .and, that siie was df.,siroits of Ix*
ink; ztlitiwed to. give ,Iter evidc oce as soon, ;Is I,osEible.
. he Cotmuitre'acquieseing in this request, Mrs.
-was.called irf, and e4atnioecl to the following
(Aka

13y the:CirANOTE,T,AR of tbe'EXCIIRQUER.—^^
11A Alrs. Clarice brot.ight.ihe two 'itatei 'bat Ole
nicticitmed in her last exatnivatioll Tbey are
here.

Q: Has Mts.- Chirke received any other • notes
than these trout the Duke of York bince her,separa-
tion from his Royal Highness ?—, A, llore than
fifty.
• -(4. Do you 'recant& having receivea-a note .10
that effea r----(Tliecopy of a note waslbewn to Mrs.
ke'Lirke,),—A. I do not recoiled .any thing about it :
pObsibly I might, possibly I, might not. I have been
looking over my 'notes, wand I .eannot find any thing
like it. I know his Royal I lgt4tie.ss wrote ztoother
note by. Greenwood,...t.alic'h I (
Q. fidw long is it snyv Mrs:Clarke reeolleaed
that .she ,hat ?-.A. Not till jusLnow.
Tho,;ie ate theonly letter. tent'aiiiitig,
Q. The hmt question repited.---A. I can't tell.
I .was nut certain that I burnt it till Hooked over my
letters. I never keep any thing that is unpleasant.
0. Did the witness ever know Mts. li'..votirite.by
anyothername?,A. No.

. .
.41. Did bile crier make °Nile witness's. name?
I have beeii told so. I. tear Mrs. Yavourite hay
been telling a great riony stuiies ; 1 know she did
to Mr., Ellis, 'tram service she came to me.

Q.. Did the witness ever cap'on her at, ?
I,tiov't recoil :4d. . .

\Vity did the witnes4 turn her away
'Because I had hist autne thitigi for which I could•not
actmunt. - ,

U. How long was it .after the witness turned Mrs.
Favourite away, before she took her into her service
ogain?-4..A. yea and half. Net until I much,
wanted her.
Q. How often hr's Afrs. Favourite been in, the
witness's service A great many thugs
inution,Of Mr. C. Act uns, that part of the
fuuner minutes of evidence Was read, in which. Mrs.-
Clarke ,had stated hir having pinned up at the head
of. her I.)ed.a list of the .friends Whom she: wished
.to
be promoted, and which list the Puke of York took
down.

Q. By Mr. C. ADAMS.--Does the witness abide
by that statement r---A., Yes; I never pretended to
make a.iy-other.

Q How long was that list so pinned up 1-4,
His it,iyal Highness took it down the second Morn.
ing, dre* up the curtain, and read iti I afterwards
saw it in his Royal Highness's pocket-book, with
scratches through solcral of the names of those who
had been piotnote.l. •

The witness has said, th4t the Duke of York
did not take it doWn till the second naortling. Did