The Sun.
London, England, 1807-01-17 00:00:00

TO THE LADIES.

AGAZET's ORIENTAL pEPILATORY, for
13 removing SUPERFLUOUS HA 1 R S front the FA C E,
NECK, ARMS, &c. and for improving the COMPLEC_
TION. The above has been sufficiently celebrated through..
out the Eastern Nations, from whence it was first brought
to this Country by Lady M- W- M ---ue, and
has since that time sustained a charaaer in England, and
on the Continent, as the only Depilatory ever offered
to the Public which unites mildness of operation, not
to irritate even the delicate skin of an, Infant, with infillt-
ble and. permanent efficacy. The constant spurious at-
tempts to imitate this Depilatory have induced the
Proprietor to appoint Messrs. Hendrie and Son, Whole-
sale Perfumers, Titchborne-street ; Mr. Butler, No. 5,
Cheapside ; Messrs. Dicey and Sutton, Bow Church-yard;
Mr, Berry, Wholesale Perfumer,k; reek-street, Soho ; Messrs.
Shaw and Edwards,. St. Paul's Church-yard; Mr. Bacon,
Oxford-street; and Messrs. Newberry and Son, St. Paurs
Church-yard, his sole Wholesale Agents in London, who
will make the usual Allowance to the Trade.
N. B. In Turkey and Egypt it is employed by the Men to
give uniformity and shape to their Mustachios, &c. ; price
3s. 6d. the Bottle.

DERSONS who have unfortimately madeiuse of
_ that dangerous Mineral Mercury, would do well to
weigh the consequences before it is too late, and resort to
those Medicines or established celebrity and charmer for a
permanent and radical Cure, and thereby establish their
Health upon the most firm and lasting foundation.

The Anti-Impetigines, or Solomon's Drops, prove of the
highest utility in all cases of "depraved habit with aftktions
of the skin :" Hence its efficacy in the case of ScUrvy, Scro-
fula or Leprosy, as well as in the Confirmed Lues ; and hence
by, its sanative powei it expels the virus out of the system,
and restores it to convalescence. In Scorbutic Complaints,
Lues, &c. Mercury, Antimony, and Aquafortis have been
recommended and tried, but they reduce Patients who have
made use of them to the most deplorable state, and have left
Complaints which the skill and abilities of the First ,Physi-
cians have been unable to cope with. These Disorders fiy
before the effets of the Anti-lmpetigines prepared by Dr.
Solomon, Gilead House, near Liverpool, which restores the
affiided Patient in the most gentle manner, even when Sali-
vation has failed, and leaves the whole frame firm and health..
ful. The numerous and respedable signatures which, have
appeared in our Paper from time to time will speak more than
any encominins wecan bestow upon it.
Sold in cos. 6d. arid 335, bottles l • the latter contain four
of the former, by which the Purchaser saves 95. Every ge-
twine bottle has a Stamp, which bears the Proprietor's name
and address, " Saml. Solomon, Liverpool," to imitate which
is felony.
N.B. The Postage of all Letters to the DOdor must be
paid, and cos. 6d. as a fee enclosed for advice.
Sold by Mrs. Mathews, No. iB, Strand, London; Mr.
Smith, Perfumer, No. 3S, and Mr. Raeburn. North Bridge;
Mr. Baxter and Mr. Scott, South-Bridge; Mr. Davidson and
Husband, Elder and Co. Edinburgh; Mr. Baxter, Glasgow ;
W. Cameron, Greenock; G. Browning, Paisley; H. Craw-
ford, Kilinarnock • W. Young, Irvine ; A. Forsyth, and P.
,Whiteside, Ayr; W. Crawford, Girvan ; I. Carson, New.
Douglas; T. M'Millan, Kirkcudbright; T. M `Creche, Kirk.
alny J. Blyth, Leven; J. Defripster, Cupar ; Allan, Dun-
dee; P. Craigie, Montrose; Mitchell, and f Anderson,
Aberdeen ; Dr. White, Banff; M`litiosh, Inverness ; T.
M'Kenzie, Stornoway; P. Taylor, Stranraer ; Johnson and
Bisset, Perth; W.Anderson, Sterling; Coke and Reid, Leith;
Alexander, Dunfermline; Wilson, Dunbar; Vinnet, Ar-
broath ; Dickson, Inglis, Dumfries ; Phorson, Berwick ;
Weddel, Alnwick ; Paterson. Arbuthnot, and lamieson,
terhead ; A. Wllonald, Trongate, Glasgow; and by most
Booksellers 'and Venders of Patent Medicines in the United
Kingdom.

IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT

HOUSE OF PEERS,

FRIDAY, JANUARY 16.

The Duke of Richmond, -the-Earl ofDartmouth,.
tlie Bishop 'of Ely, and Lord Carteret, took the Oaths
and their Seats.

The Royal Assent was given by Commission to
the Exchequer Bills Bill, and:a Naturalization Bill.
The Commissioners were the Lord Chancellor,
Lord Walsingham, and, Lord Auckland. •
In the Appeal " Page and .others v. Hamilton and
others,", the Solicitor General. was heard in reply.' =
Further.conilderation appointed for Thursday sen-
..
right.

Oralham; InspeEtor
,of. Convias, presented
the' Btate Of-the Hulks in the River, and at
Portsnlotith;.m;hiSwas ordered to lie on the table..
Adjourned till Tuesday.

ROUSE OF COMMONS,

FRIDAY, JAN. 16:

Tpe ,SPEAKER acquainted the House that the
,Royal „Assent had Ibeenziven. to the Exchequer Bills
Bill. He had also to inform the House, that be
had receive- Aron) the Deputy Clerk of the Crown,
in Ireland, a letter containing an. account of Barri-
..sters-qualifi,edic Commissioners serve as Cossioners under- the
new. Act for. Regulating Controverted Eledions
therein.. He had further' to acquaint the House,
that Williarrilaker, who had petitioned against the
'Return -for' the Borough of New&stre-under-the-
-Line,' had not entered' into the recognizances te-
.quired by the 28th of his present Majesty, and,that
Art-consequence of this Default, the Order of the Day
-for taking such Petition into consideration should be
discharged, and was , discharged accordingly. Sir
Edward John Brown not having entered into the
same, the Order of the Day for hearing the County
of Mayo Petition was discharged.—Upon the ground
spf. a similar default, on the part of Sir Charles
Saxton and Henry Bouverie, the Order of the Day.
for hearing the Malmsbury Petition was discharged.
The Order of the Day for hearing the Petition corn—
'plaining' of an undue Return for the Borough of
Hythe, was also discharged, the Petitioners, Thomas
Stacey and others, not . havingentered into the ne-
"cessary recognizances. . • •
The London Dock Company Bill, far enabling the
Company to purchase certain Water-works, was read
a second time. • •
General WALPOLE gave notice, that he would, on
Wednesday. next, move that the Londonderry Peti-
tion be heard upon a day subsequent to that already
-fixed upon,
Lord CASTLEREAGH moved,. that the Abstra& of:
the -Estimates of Army Service for the year 1807, •
_presented on,the 14th by the Secretaty at War, -be
Ftrinted.—Ordered. .
Mr. T. Gazist-vrt,LETMoved, that .the Estimates of
the' Debt, of his Majesty's Royal Navy, since 30th
September, 1806, be laid before the Frouse.—Or-
. • '
• Mr. T. GaErstviLLS gave notice, that in the Corn-
-inittee of Supply for Friday next, he would move for
lArote of 'lo,ooo' seamen additiOnal to the 120,000
-air,eady voted. -• •
• -Sir J. NEWPORT brought up the Bill for Abolish—
ing. certain Offices in .Ireland.—Read a first tinio,
.and ordered to be read a second time on Friday.
Upon the Motion of. Sir J. NEWPORT, the House,
. went into a Committee on the Corn Intercourse.A4 ;
when it was, resolved, that it was the opitsion of
that Committee, that certain provisions made in an
Ad of last. Session of Parliament for the better regu-
lating the Corn- Intercourse related to the producevf
the two Countries only.
Lord PORCHESTER asked whether the Hon. Ba-

toner meant that this declaration of the meaning of
„. the A& should ad as any modification of the Malt
Trade ?
Sir J. NEWPORT was free to state, that nothing
was farther from his intention than any interference
with the Malt Trade ; that the word Malt had crept
- into the.preamble.of the former A&, but was not to
be found in the enaaling clauses.
. Leave was given to bring in a Bill pursnant-to the
. Resolutions of the Committee,
, Upon the House resuming, Lord HoWicit ex-
pressed a wish that an Hon. General (Porter) would
fix his Motion for some day subsequent to Wednes-
day, as, upon' that day the Army .Estirnates, would
be momed,-.-a.question that might give . fise,,to an
important discussion.
General P.ORTiiConidera-11iS Motion
portance :inferior to nothing that could occtipi the
attention of that House. He was willing, however,
to accede to the Nyishes of Ills Noble Friend, and
therefore would postpone it, till Friday.
Coloriel CATI/THORNE submitted to the House,
whether it was. fair, after the. delays he had uni-
formly obje&ed to,. 'and that had been too often re-
, peated, that the 'House: shonld be: kept in longer
' suspense upon any pretence whatever; he could.not
help sayinu.,Ahat he thought the Honourable Mem-
ber pledged to bring forward his Motion on Wed-
nesday next': ,
Lord HOIVI:CK said, that lie could not be
brotight to think 'that any individual consideration,
however interesting, could compare in public irn-•
pOrtance with a great pnblie'exigeney.7—The Army
Estimates were to be voted upon Wednesday,' and
it was propoSed to consider the other busin6ss upon
the following Friday. Surely in such circumstances
no Gentleitan:could seriously complain of .suspense
for two days only,---Ordered for Friday next.: •
ORDER OF COUNCIL.

Mr. PERCIVAL rose and said, that .:I.vhen he
gave his notice yesterday of moving that his Majesty
be requested to submit to that House the Order of
Council of the 7th of January, he did not anticipate
the slightest opposition on the part Of his Maje Sty's
Ministers. A Noble Lord, however, 'opposite to him
(Lord Howick) had since, with that candour which
became him, and for which he gave him his un-
feigned thanks, intimated to him that.the motion he
Was about to make would have the misfortune of his
Lordship's opposition. :However formidable such
an opposition most be to' him; he would not suffer
himself to be alarmed by the threat until, he bad
learned upon what that opposition would be ground-
ed. Would it be rested upon that favourite principle
of Ministers,the imprudence of too public a disclosure,
and the prerogative of his Majesty to reserve to

the .grout ..of f Qbjeainn, be,sonld only sayi that
what had'appeareil in tfe publiC oazette, and night
therefore be prescimedgo be, -notorious throughout
the coup not acquit t any very dangeaJus
addition of notoriety, were it even ordered to be laid
before that House. But, if the ground of the Noble
Lord's objeEtion (as he rather suspe&ed) to the pro-
-(lu6tioti of the Paper, was 'founded upon -a'prior
6bjeCtion• to the proceeding, expected to be insti-
tuted upon, the contents of thiS Paper, in that case
he must say, that he thought it.lair to question the
justice' of. opposing- any'Motion whatever because
it was possible that that Motion might be.produive

of another in itself only -objeelionable. If, however,
-this was the substance of the Noble Lord's objection,
the question then before the HoUse stood thus-r-whe-
tiler the House would oppoSefthe produCtion.of 'a
most important Paper, merely because, the Noble
Lord thought that there might be instituted upon it,a
.proceeding to which his Lordship would feel it neces-
sary to give every opposition. He should be
,perfeetly
satisfied to let it stand thus, and leave it to the Can-
dour of the House to decide 'upon it, were it not
that an obje&ion upon 'this ground hurries' him
prematurely into thedefence of his ulterior Motion
and the simple question of the' produation of this
Paper is lost in the more cOMplicated one'of the ex-
pediency of the proceeding to be founded upon that
Paper. If he was thus to be, called upon for the de-
fence of: a motion which was to. be the business of
another day, he should feel it as due to the great im-
portance of the question itself, to that House, and,
indeed, to the.necessity of-every necessary informa-
tion upon :his part,' to defer stitch. a discussion to a
more distant day : before, however, he could so de-
.termine,:; he begged' that the Noble Lord 'would es.-
plicitlystate the specific objection he had to the prO-
duCtion of the •-Paper; in the preseot instance the
natureof his Lordship's objeation would' determine
him as to the propriety of pressing his present mo-
tion, or bringing the business with which it was
connected before 'that House on a• future day, that
that House and himself might have every due ad-
vantage preparatory to the discussion of a question
of such vital importance to the 'Coannerciginterests
Of the Empire.
- Lord HOWICK said, that when the intention- of
the Right Hon. Gentleman of moving for the produc-
tion of this'Paper was intimated to him, he had stated
his ,obje6tiOn; and.•that,in this respeCt he hoped that
•not eventhe Right ion. Gentleman himself would'
-be found willing ,to charge him with any deficiency
in fairness and candour. .These objections were,
however, in one instance, entirely misunderstood. He
had never said that he would object to thiS Motion on
the principle of its giving rise to public. disclosure Of
the proceedings of the Cabinet that it might be pru-
diem to Conceal, because he was aware, that in the
"present ease, the Prodnaion. of it to that House
cculd.addtrery'little
.fo its. notoriety; and certainly
nothing to its authenticity i• beSides, it;was entirely
agr-eable •to Parliamentary. usage to move for the
produaian of important documents—an usage, how-
ever, Uniformly confirledsto two distina. cases ; one
wherethe (iocuinent moved for bore directly upon
Certain • busieess
;then pending in „Parliament,. and
served to clear up obscurities .and obviate difficulties
therewith.' connected ; and the other:where an Ab-
straft Paper Tas.moved for, for the' purpose of insti-
tuting al)roceeding thereon. To the latter case :was
the motion noticed,( yesterday reducible -; and as be-
longing to such aclass of motions for the production •
Of Papers, he:could not agree td•the production of
this Paper, unless he approved of-"the proceeding to.
be founded opon it. Now,: from:what he could col.
le& of the nature of this proceeding, he had reason
to believe it would prove altogether unprecedented,
and.(if he was not much mistaken) would be, found
liable to objections of the most insurmountable na-
ture. , :If he might be permitted to. suggest to the.
Right Hon. Centlernan that.course which to hitn•ap-T
peared preferable, he would advise him to defer his
motion (as it involved in it the question of the propri-
ety of the proceeding to be grounded upon that P-
aper) to such
.4: timeas the acknowledged importance'
Of the subject so- iniperiouslY.deManded. '
Mr.PEßClVAL'admitted the justice of the
hie Lord's claims to candour in general, and. thank-
ed. him- for the frankness which charaaterised his
communication in this business.. He now saw from
what had fallen from the Noble Lord, that it would
be useless for him then to persist in his Motion for
the produCtion of the Paper.- He could not, how-
ever,•i) el p saying,
,that he 'thooght the Noble Lord's
method of opposing 'die 'production of Papers as un-
pretedented as'any proceeding could he that Might
be founded Upon those" Papers. '• ;
lord ROWICK.said, that it would be fo:' the
sHonsetodetermine that question, and that he'would
not follow, the Right Hon. Gentleman's example•O
closely as -to take upon.. him to decide whether his
opposition to an unsupported Motion, or the Gen,:
tleman's intendeleXtraordinary proceeding-, 'Was the'
most unprecedented ; 'he wished to ,know whether
the Gentlernah 'Would think- it prudent to -let the,
'Hotise have an outline of the 'proceedings to be
'grounded upon this Paper?,,,' • ,
..• - •
Mr, PERCH/7,11, was Most. anxious that the
House should have the fullest information upon a
Subject,:ef so much imp,ortan.ce. 'I object of his
inquiry 'should be as to the object of the Order of
Council- 'sof the. 7th' instant---Whether it could*. be
Maintained' that that Ord'er7 was. sufficiently Compre-
. hensive and effective. is retaliation ? 'Whether 'in
wisdom, and in sound policy, it was calculated,tO
_ obviate. the diffiCulties, and -repel the dancrers, tq
Which our cuinnlerce was subjected by the b•;7)ld,,del
cisive and vigorous proceedings of the enemy ?
Whether; in a word, it went to do that which it
professed to do ? and if in, all these 'respects it was
found. entirely to fail, -if it was found to be timid
and wavering- in its consultation, and indeterminate
and inefleetual in its operation, he shouidfeel it his
duty to call upon that House to interpuse its wisdem
to supply this defeat, 'to give its weaknesS strength,
And. its:ambiguity a meaning. He would give his
Motion the full benefit of the notice which he should
have thought necessary to the proceeding he was to
ground upon that Motion, had it been agreed to:—
Notice fixed for Thursday sesnnight.