The Sun.
London, England, 1813-12-15 00:00:00

.HOLLAND.

Sir JAME 9 YPINTOSII,rOSC. to put stime questions
tip the Noble Lott( (Lord Castlereagh), in conse-
ipienee of his having seen it announced in the
London Gazette, that an Ambassador had been
appointed for Holland, muter a new stile and de-
sigoatioe. Ile was aware, that it was coptrary
to Parliatnentrary usage to preface questions by
any observations, and he shottld have abstained
from so doing at present,. even if the usage
bad not been so well established. The -ques-
tions that he had to propose to: the Noble
Lord were,—whether it was known to his Ma-
jesty's Ministers, before his Serene Highness
the Prince of Orange left this country, that it
%vas his intention to exercise powers, or assume a
stile and- title unknown to the ancient laws of
the United Provines ; and whether he had assum-
ed those titles and authorities with the privity and
con'setit of his Majesty's Govirnment I
Lord CASTLEUEAG IT replied, that he was not
privy to any determination or intention of the
Prince of Orange, before he left this country, to
take any new titles, or exercise any new autho-
rity. His Serene Highness had been invited to
Holland by a provisional Government there esta-
bli,hed, and his ,Majesty's Ministers did not know
what fuuctions of, that govermtrent he would be
called itpoo to exercise, or t,ylutt titles would be
cOoterred upon him by the people,of that country.
visas Impfty, however, to state,' that to the au-
thority he now e:,ereised, and to his present title,
be had been called-by the Spontaneous and Lla,
illmous voice of the whole nation. It 'was not
(nerdy. the former friends of the [louse of ()range',
but those also who had, in other times, been
most adverse to the power of that flintily, were
now united in opinion, that a higher ra ik should
be given to hint in the State than was held by his
ancestors, Ilis Majesty's Ministers, iwWevel
ctattiously abstained' from making out: the ereden,:
tials to the Anibassador at the Hague, until a for-
mal notification hail been received from llollatid,
of the style and title conferred upon his Serene
Highness the Prince of Orange.
Sir lions M'lxToso said, that iu conseptence
of what bud fallen from the Noble Loi'd, he felt
it to be his duty to state, tinder the present cir-
cumstances, that it' the Noble Lord, or any of his
Majesty's 'Ministers should propose' an adjourn-
ment of the Home for a much longer period than
mots usual, he should oppose the adjournment,
unless Ministers made out a strong case to •shew
the necessity of it.
Lord CASTIMREAOII 'sled, that it was his inten-
tion to move that the House should, at its rising,
adjourn to Friday next, It was probable that on
Monday the olterior adjouruateatt would take
place. The Honourable and Learned Gentle-
man Might, therefore, take that opportunity of
expressing his sentiments in opposition to the ad-
imminent.
It appeared to be the understanding of the
House, that on Monday Sir JAMES WINTOS
Wollid opeose the question of adjournment.

IRISH INSOLVENT DEliTOltl/4;.
Sir S. :Roimmt,v, seeing the 'lrish Chancellor of
the Exchetpfer iu his place, \visited to he informed
n halter there was any intention of .hringiog in a
Bill to autcoti the Act of last Session, or n'ictu-
rortory Bill, for the relief of the Irish Ih-solvents ?
Att the Irish Bill of last Session was_ precisely si-
,milar to tile one for this country, he shouldicon-
ceire some such measure netessnty,
• Mr. 1,41.rz0 IntALD said; that the some difficulties
bad not been found in Ireland, and lie was there-
fore not :mare of any necessity fin stir') liltititireff..
S, Rom ILLY that lie seas inforwen that
sitliculties had, taken' place in Ireland as to the
form of the engagements to paying the creditors,
alai that in consequence of those diffieult les., many
of- the insolvent debtors could not ohfaht their
disticare;e:
'lna) .11.1 d, that he should make par-
frelAr inplil'h's on that subject.
'f he•Exch,quer and the Vreno.lVine Duty win,
were reel a third time, and pa*scd.
'ft :)ther Orders of the Day were then diqnted

LAW INMLLIGENCE.

COURT OF CO,l:tit:EPS; Dm 14.

`IIIF. 110USE."WATI-318 V. IrAYI,OTT.

The Logo TCHAtit3EGT-Olt asked if the 'minutes
his. decree had been drawn up in-this cause ?
Ur. Umti pi, Counsel for the kiinta, said, they
nad not, on account of tbe.indisposition of Mr.
. -
Johnston, Who waS with hint in thceause, and he did
not, wish to draw them up without his assiStauce.
rr n cu.o.ro4r.t.ort desired they.might be
ready,
.on irlinsday, ,
11..kitT,saitk, he was instructed by the paw.,
to:aot t!is Lordship if there would be any impro-
priety in his putting aunty persons into the Opera
li„,t4e, not by the way at taking possession, but
In guard the property against tire or any other
dauir;er, at present it was without such protection,
The Loiu CIiANCELLOK observed, there. wits

. ,
•
tyoOlingto prove It either o parties item Vot-
tiitgropey pvriozis in to that the pl'opekty was
setitrecl. .

• TOhNErt, BA .'t'. pAtEttyk:, ct.siu
In this case, in which an Iniunetion had been
granttd, till the crutting i i of the answer, to re=
strain the defendant Ltd procitd i 0 all act ion at law).
to recover front the present plaintiff. Sir Gregory
Page Turner, the sum of 13,001)7. which ,had been
agreed upon to be path by the present plaintiC to
the defendant, as the price of certain pictures pur4
chased by the plaintiff; from the defedbiant.---The
Loa Ctr;.!icut.colt, on hearing Cotodstl, dis-
solved tide Nam:thin, seeing nothing in the an-
swer on which his Lordship could -fasten the ju-
risdiction of a Court of Equity.

CONSISTORY corwr, DC3C TORS' COMMONS.

MAYBE' V. 14 A'Y .

This was a cause of dis•orge, or separation,
brought by Charles Mayhew, Esqr against Snralt
Mayhew, his wife, by reast)o of adultery alleged
to have been committed with 'a Mr. John Clarke.
It appeared, that the marriage took. place between
the partici urn the 2.lth September, 180(i, and that
they cohabited together as man told wife, and had
issue by that marriage three children, two of
whom are living. That in the month of August,
1811, Mrs. Mayhew Accra to i\largate, where she
became acquainted with Mr. Clati,le, aml a crimi-
nal intercimrse"Nas the consequence of such ac-
quaintance.
The Counsel on behalf of Mrs. Mayhew admit-
ted the fact of adultery, as alleged ; but eon-
temied there. was collusion proved on the part
.of
the husband.

The Learned Judgc• (Sir Wm. SCOTT) was of
Opinion, that the fact of adultery was clearly
prOved, and that there was nothing of collusion to
preycnt the husband obtaining the remedy which
he prayed ; and therefore he pronounced for the
separation.

I...)UNDAS 1). MI NDA',4

This was also a suit of divorce,, brought by
Robert Dun(las, Esq. against Jane Dundas, his
%rife, by reason of. adultery alleged to b;tve
been committed with Lord Semple. The tnaterial
facts in this case (ns appeared from the
and proceedings produced in the cause) were as
follow :

That the marriage was solemnized by license,
on the 3d April, 1805, at the par:sh church of St.
• Clement's Danes. That in the year 1814,- Dtrrd
kntple was.introdneed into the family, ..at Edin-
burgh. That on their arrival in London they re-
sided at Morland's Hotel, as.. did also Lord
Sentple. That, soon after, Mr. Dundas had. oe.-
casion •to go tit Sweden, having property there ;
onderstaiiding that his wife, during his absence,
intended to reside with her sister, Dady Douglas,
in the country. That on Isis return front Sweden
he went id Morland's Ilotel, where, to his great
sttrprize, he was informed that his wife was in
the house, and that Lord S'emple freqtented the
same. That immediately after Lord Semple quit-
ted Hotel, and Mrs. Dinulas followed ; and
shey. were ,first traced to the Worcester Coffee-
bowie, and afterwards to a lodgin in Cumber-
liindtreet; New4ottd,.• where they colvahited.to-
!railer as man. and wife, .fora considerable time,
andstill,continue so to do. It also appeared that
Mr. DUndas obtnine.d a verdict of 4000/. damages
against. Lord Seuiple, in the Common - Law
Court. •

The fact of adultery being clearly establishel
by the evidence produced, the Learued Judge (Sir
Wm.- Scott) in on'ouncea for the remedy wh►:h
the husband prayed. • •

STOCK V. STOCK.

This was likewise a suit of divorce, institute 4
by Matilda Stock, against Jatnes'Stock, her
band, of Strawbridge, by reason of cruelty, and
adultery alleged to have been committed with va..
rious ivomen.7—No defenee •Was set up in this case,
and the facts alleged being clearly proved, a sen-
tence of separation Was pronounced by the Court.