The Sun.
London, England, 1809-05-18 00:00:00

TL/E 11R17:7311 1R.12 Y IA POIITIRML.

The feltowing is the corit.(.'l state of tile .
Ktl
Array Portugal, arid triticil had ten the Field
wider the command Qt.i.ieuteriant-General Sir Jolla
Craddock, k. B. and rK. C. and leftt:heti Ley ;in.
-,7Sitcond conntiand,ilfajor-Cvnetri Shrrbrooke.
ci.ritutr.
Major.Genena Cotton—t.ith Light Dragoons, Cal. liawket 16th Light thagonlis,
,Culor.f.q Anson t Detavhiniint
Light Dragoons, 41fliijor bl.kc ; Ditto 3d Light Ring's German Legion, Captain Nieyer.'

loins? LANg.
Brigadier-Gen. Campbell liattaiion Coldstream Ginrds,
Licut,Col. Hulse ;. tOt Ditto, 31 Guards, Col. Stoprot.f.,
Major.t;rnetal M'Ken4o-3d bSattalion 27th Regimenri
Lieut... Colonel M4Lean ; Ditto, Gist Regiment, Major
Watson; Ist. Ditto. oth Regiment,: Licat.• Cal. G nerd.
arigailler,Lietiersl Stewart-1101 Reolllo,,t,
tv him; ist Batt. Detachments,' Lieut. C. klunbury.
Mujor.General Tiison —lst Regimest, id, or Boil's,
Colonel Drummond ,• ad Ditto, sith, Major Gough ; Ist
Dittn, 88th, Major Vantlelettr.
Major-General Nlorray and Brigadier.Ctberal Drabtrg and
Langworth—tit Line Itattalitm, King's German Legion, .
Alajor flatterer; zt Ditto, Ditto, Lieut..Coionel Blown;
sth J.itto, iii gip, Major Gerlict; "at Ditto, Lieutenant.
Colonel Low.

$139011.0 1,,22111:
Btigacticr-Qawrgi A. Carnpril— zit notation 7th, or Royat
Lieutenant-ColLinel Sir W. Myers; ue Ditto
taetittroint-Cutoiatt Bingturn.
Itrigaclior-Getieral Sot4ag--97th Itekirnent, Cotonol
Lyon ; B
-Vetietrtaalllon
ii)terto4ici Li (11)/ti4,kat ti4alicioutr.9-tCh°Fl°onuCl, CLigPous7:ll.:
Ctironel Aluilei Ad Battalion 83d, Licut.-Cultmet corJuilo

IlfisEl',VS.
Miijot.Genool Hill ...id 114 W-ion 48th Foot, Lieut.-Ciionel
Duckworth ; cat /14ttalion 61tri ( 14.) 1113. pr Davy ; ad
Itattalion 66th, Kajor Nturray.
In Gatriivii at LisbtO, 24 ti4tt.lilOti 30 Regiment, Colonel
NI Innet r. ,o. Briwiler. General Howarth, commanding ttut Artillery.
Chief Engincer—Lieirt..Cotonel FiL:totcr,
Dcputy-Atliuli.lllt-(;metal littil.•Coloncll Darroell.
Deputy'.Quartcr-M4ster-Generat—C.oloa4l Donkin.
Deputy.- Coutnitssary.t.;eneral— I'. Rawlings, k; 4q.
lospettor of tiospitztis —Alexander Thompson,. Esq.
rEaSONAL sTAkt, OF Tali eCi'AINIANDER Or tut

Fintv.El,
Lievq.-Colonel 12 7131, :Vlllitiry Sccrerary,
Monk, ;ii I uot, 141.0414.• '•(,,l.Lit I ant Fqsigrz,
I fivln4tltle, ti:•uld3tleatil (./Liati;ts Vic...oLult ;44610)41,
• ph tout;

It will. be reconeeted that we lately noticed to onr •
readers a toismiderstpiding between the Chinese
ciovernmera and the British Merchants resi*nt
AlscaO. The inclosed extract pia tenet from Prince
of Waleiai Liana will be foetid interesting
" The Ship Snlemany 'lett Macao 9ltt Oa, and
~
arrived at Penang, _ t,sth November..
" Thu accounts contained in letters received by
her represent tlie Chinese as greatly alarmed at 014
appearance of the British ships of war and transports
and the lauding.of. troops at Macao, They had, it 4
consequence, according to the established pradice is
cases reptiting explanation, resorted to the means of
suspending all trade and intercourse with the British
shipping at China; and sostri6tly was this order en.
forced ad interim , that the usual supplies of provisions
were not allowed to beset); mita the ships. Jr is added
that the Chinese, in the proposition that had been
made, stipulated for the re-embarkation of the Dri.
tisli troops from Macao, as the only condition -on
which they would consent to renew the intercourse
with the English on its former footing.
" Such ships as had complota their cargoes, ;md.
were ready for sea, were allowed to ka i , two cOl.lO
try shipi only were in that forwardness,,e4. the
Baring and . They sailed from Macho 9th
041obar. The litet or hichomen .which arrrived at
MOCO-0, under COtiVdy of the Lion, 27th ieptember,
wonld .be detained there from the want of pilots
mod the order tor the suspension of trade until tho
oftilsting differences were adjusted.dr •
The supercargoes continued on the same friond,
ty 4.‘ng **the Chino as fermerly. ft
headThito believed that the grounds of difference,
would its satisfactorily arranged in the course of Oc-
tober. The American ships were at. Ulainpore a;
the date 'of the present 'llCenutit. There had uten
no arrival- from America at the date, of .the present
account. There-had beenzto arrival from America
fur some considerable tithe preceding. Dollars were
unusually 4044 OyVing tg the nou-arrival of specie
from - -

" Tip and other articles Nuf much fall= tn price,
owing ttz thp ntln.imercoorse with the Amerieam,i,
.* The-prisoto ncenunts from Penang, represent
the trade of that Settlement as fiat."

Or Sunday one of the swans St. James's Park
lath:lied six young,ones. She bads since attpcked
'nen, women, and children, th WO most tortoui.

manner.

110 w-stattm.—Yesterelay.fignn rft qld, a private
in the Royal Horse Gtiards,, was elorit,d before Mr.
Ilead, with telonionsly stealing two Duties, the pro.!
perty of Mr. Stuart, of the Toy Inn, Utruptoir.
It appeared that a post-boy sva4 front
London on Friday evening, and on his Way ltopoja
at a barber's shop in Kensington, to get shavod,
while he WO in the shop the horses *ere stfileh
the door. The horses have since beets trrived itt.Q
the possessyYn, of the Prisoner at the Kiog'4
ileum Bottoll3. 7.1114 rrisorier was cQuunitted ttsr
trial.

• ,

1,17 P REPORT. ,-t 4

°Us. COURT.
tone) tfeinee re rem; Feemeepe.
Mr: O'.DEDI Cqued die.pleadiriga on the girt of
geanhope. stated 'this: wbe a re4tearing
the Whieitihad formerly been before
Ileeeer, which lie had'.proeounCed e Decree,
great ilea of w inch was, by, the present petition,
eetieht -•to' be °mite:el. •He proceeded. to read the
preyer ef the• petition, tied elne'objeaionable parts
of the Dei4ee.
BremeeneexptesSed a hope, se the Noble
Earl hat •Counsel We:11 skiff ::d in the laws, and, in
the &trio of his particular cast, that he wont(' en-
tun the .c nodua of it to thetn.
Earl Sretenore said, that there was an old Eng-
lish saying, and lie thought it a true one, that 'r old
birds are not to be caught with chaff." He hoped
lie was not, at his time of life, and with the ex-
he bad -placed hefore him, to be caught in
this tuanncr.e. Various efforts had been made to this
effete, but they should be utewailing. lie bad a
complete knowledge of his. own cause, and of the
lee by which it ought `to be regulated; therefore,
theogh the general legal knowledge of the Learned
Counsel by whom he was assisted might be greater
. than that.whieh he hinisotf possessed, he could net
cot ent personally to abandon the defeuce of a cause
itt which his own charaaet, and whet was still more
clear to'hian, the charatiter of his revered and worthy
father, was attempted to be called in question. In
ceiling on hi's Honour to omit eeeat part of the Dee
eree pronounced by him in this case, he assured his
Honour, that, fliough his objeaiona must be nu-
ttierous and weighty, be entertained the fulleat re-
liancenn his love of justice, and on his desire itn-
, partially to administer it on the present occasion.—
If he did not regard his condufl in this light, he
should not now come before his Honour to ask him
to review his judgment, but should at once go to a
higher Tribunal. Of the
.Leatned Counsel on the
other side, he also found himself bound in justice to
say, that though he had formerly in this case, been
obliged to treat thein with little ceremony, and
Must still continue to do so, so far.as this.cause was
concerned, he entertained the highest opinion of
their 'general learning and legal knowledge. The
first part of the Decree went to refer it to Mr. Har-
vey, the Master, to inquire into the sale of an es-
tale fir 2:3,000l. made during the lifetime of his
Earl Stanhope, and
.whether such sale
had been made in terms of the trust, 1774. To
tins part of, the Decree his Lordship objeOted, on
,;1,
', variety of grounds. There was no charge of such a
ttatestiaion in the Bill; there Wa3' no sentiment to
'support such a charge, had it been nunie ; end 'here
W3S rat even a prayer to :'cover' any transaction
‘Otii.)l the late Earl. of Stanhope might have been
lecieel, the .Bill beim?: expressly confined to
,ee; of sales, whiCit had taken place iluring
flirt present E.rl. His Lordship, to
Lee : e ea, nini- Ot charge, statemenf,
• was settieient trepreclede a plaintiff from
I.li- :, nee, red -0 IteeN.dalel6 book ell Cheectry
Pre lice, which Lie, it Jo vvii -that every charge tri,,,t
snnp, tied ty a statement, anti that ktknefixnt
b.)r,te out b)' proof: T*e,.ws•re wanting in the
pte,ent case ; and it was ebstied for the l.ratord
Cia0,....! to alege, as they. h:' that" they
be imgylied by t ILL! prayqr for 'general relict such
prayer being only meant. to supply any error or
amisliion in form, but by no inenits to add to or en-
large iltv charges specifically, laid•in the- Bill. That
iliia«wee the aal& la‘s and of justice,: his Lordship
erjeti.edad 'o shed, by notitiog Jour dittkeot unani-
tie -us decisions of the Hee .e
-of Lords, in the course
of -:Mr. -Hastings's Impeachment.; in which it was
, held that the twawer of a' defendant, or pt.;r,on ac-
ute-Jed, could never enitirge or extendethe charge
made against: him; that the untitnese of <a person fir
a 1-i-oak:elm' office could not be 'admitted to be proV-
euch unfitness had not originally been
elleged ; and where it had been' laid-down:lie a ge-
neral rule of laeeand of justice, •that nothing'shonid
be allowed to be provod. against any mar-which' he
had nor been previonsly prepared-to expea.. These
dtieisions, his Lordship contended, r drew a circle
lotmd the Master of the Bolls, as well as round
every., other Judge in thili Country,. beyond the eir-
curnterence of which he, no more than akirOther
Jtulge, was entitled to move. This ortwof
klonouria Decree; therefore, his Lordship sUbMitted,
must be left out. The second part, which regarded
, the immediate calling in of this ea,oool. his laird-
'ship conceived musu•also he, omitted, for, 'besides
laboering udder all the objections which applied to
the first part of the Decree, -it was liable to this
acl-
ditional objeaiott, that, it ,seemed to.implv the pro-
nouncing of a final' judgment 6.o'On:inquiry. :Be
,was convinced his linnour wotld' be sorry to-think
that 'he had determined a point on which he bed
ordered izieeiry .to he' made. Yet, this he rnrglit
find to be the case, and it might even turn out atter
this sum had been called its, that—ir*ad remained
on 'Mortgage from good and prudetttiel neativei.—
As to the laying out this sum in the thtee" per
•seeits. instead of continuing it ae was designed
by the trust CM meagre .iae otherwise, at the
Trestee under his Lefaip'e • di:ea-elan might
point, his Lordship: conceited this contrary. to
an the, povvers in the deed of trust, and to the
decisions on the sab,eti. ' also thought ea very
doubtful question it thee breeper. cehte. was so ad-
ventageous a mode of investment at;' that •of mon•
gage, or otherwise suggested bylaw deed.. Herehis
Lordship could not belpeeferring to thegross
11.10 throWn Out agaiost bitt-fattierlby the Learned
Coumcl, '.vho, he was coneincerli, stroke only' front
ilL,Huctiown • -Yift ktiew it-te be the privi;yge,
e as aeprepereprivilege, allowed to 09un.
bt.jto lialxiloods, i i eich :esteehoeds were per-,
tirrent t ; e-e- but wheuwch
i31,30.110iA1:i nt, as here they were pot,
' l,i i worthy t.r ur Lila personal representativee, not
I 4; 1:,57 were 83 press calumnies, though-
cetneie trim ,ee a eeth of a Counsel, as if they had
beee 1, r e!haring Cross.. It
‘,was.„ his ditty
,10i a a kat to -prated the ehatatierief
ca; ;, 'he elialleneed the Pleintiffto

;

,• - .

•.~ '1

"her iret#;'W.ti t)f- 9# bet dew •
AlMily.fuell who were strictly holKst, 110 that Stan
hope:was tuathematicilly ivAnest, That Stanhope, .
he was proud to call his tattier, If a grandson were
seen to visit the vault where the remaius of his
grandfather were deposited, and to scatter his ashes-
and bones about the grave, what must be thought of
his piety and filial duly ? Would it not be said that ,
his conduct, had' been most
,undutiful and mu,it itn-
pious ? What appellation, then, did not that man
deFerve who tore asunder his grandfather's fair
fame, who scattered abroad his reputation, suffering
it ,to become, nay, himself holding it forth as the
sport of- every ealuumioiis tongue which chose to
assail it ? His Lordship proceeded to call in question
life other intrfs of the Decree, by which a releretfee
was iftie to the Master as to the other-sales made
by hit:, and as to waste. On .the latter point he ad-
dnced a variety_ of cases, from thA of Bowles, at
law, in the year 1617, down to the case in equity,
Pearce v, Pearce, to spew that a tenant for lite, with-
ont•impeachment of waste; more particularly; that a
tenant for lifeas he was, without impeachment of or
for any manner of waste, was invested with equal
powers as if he were tenant in tail. His Lordship
concluded with hoping that his honour would as-
sign his reasons for adhering to his Decree, irhe
chose to do so.
- Mr. SCOTT, Counsel for the Earl, was about to
proce,d, when Mr. RtcnAttos objcaed to it. •
The. MAsTEw of the 11.01.1;s laid it down that. no
.was entitl xl to be heard 'both by himself and
his Counsel. He aught be heard, however) as 'a
matter of favour.
Earl SrAwitoee would acceptof no favour.
• Mr. Ittcuratus declined saying: any thing for the
Plaiotiff. He did not wish to allude to any of the
refleOioni thrown by the Noble Lord on the Coun-
sel, and he •did not think that any thing new had'
beemadduced on the merits of the case. ,
• The MASTER of the Roid.s saw no reason for al-
tering any 'part of his• Decree. He telt less relud-
ance in at once adopting this R,_:ss,),ation, as his
forming it could produce no irremediable iii;uty, an
Appeal lying to a higher tribunal. •
• The Decree was accordingly affirmed, with costs
to the Trustees under the Pl4ntiti's Inarriaoe
tract, but to none of the other parties.

COURT OF KlNC's BENCH, MAY

KNOWLES V. VYSS.

Mr. PAak stated this to be atvadlion for money
had and received by the Defenda:.t for the Plaintiff's
use. The Defendantlept a &CLIO:at Lambeth ; was
desirous of diiposing of it. The ain tiff agreed to
purchase it, for one hundred
,and fifty Intuea3,—
Mr. Toothead ; a setitioliissisfairt, teacher, of the
classics, and -tdmoi4troccer, was en-
.,gsleed to nego!inte; and ..he J.nadc the bargain be-
kte,sql the prinies, Wrgahl „being coneluded,-
Ihe 1,1 6jkt;ti gs. (being all the
moues. lie ilia ttrJot to 'the Plaiotiti, 45 an
eat,net to. bind the: This was about the
end o 0-cember last. ioth of January fol..
..lowiag, the Tilaintiti went to the Pelendent to pay
the remainder, and to take iy.)sstn•sion of the school;
btu, ~urpr4se, he, was told by the Defeudam,
that he eApve.ted the eoirtrat to have been complet-
ed OW the ôtb of that month. That not ~hearing
the •PlaintiT all din time, he had sold the
• t.i.:oeol to a Mr.,Williatos, who was then 4) pot-'
st2.6s,on of it. Well thec, the Pi4-totiti wanted tuck
the money ‘sinclphe had lett a§ earnest,--No, that
.he,should out have F. forit was forfeited, lor want of
hid haVmg completed the comnitt lit time. So that
the Plaintiff could neither hate the school not the
,
'money ; ihat Mr.;Vaik submitted to be contrary to
law ; .torif the contract did not go on, the money
should tie returned'. to the Plaintiff, unless he had
agreed that the money which:he advanced at "tlttl
makitez the bargain should be eousidered as a;leposig,
to be forieited at a given day, if the remainder
was not paid ; Ind, therefore, this action was
brought to recover back rhi,; money, as money had
and received by the Defendant for ,the P10441;1'8
• use.
Mr. Toothead proved the case, in substance •ac-
cording to this opeumg.
Mr. GARItoW addressed the Court on behalf
of Mr. Vyse; a-schoolmaster of- eminence, eVincecC
by the spelling-hook which bers his 'namih a
work more generally usetul, as well' as more ge4
, read, titan any uf• its 'day, except the
Pilgrim's Progress. This gentleman had wish-
ed to retire from the , fatigue of governing and
teaching untoward youth ; had determined to ie.
fire ; sold his school- to the Defendant ; and the
bargain Was to have been completed oh. the sth
of 33nttty, ;and the money dspollo, was to havo
, been forteited it' the bargain was not then fully
completed. But the evidence carried the story no
further than Mr. Toothead had stated it. The stlb-
stance of %% hicit wilS, that 401, ifs. was paid at
'the time of making the bargain, and that on the ;:oth
of January fiAlowing Mr. Williams was' in possei.=
aion of alg:soom., Nothitii;' was proved about for-
feiting the deposit, r.

Lord Et.t,lixnoitovGft,was dearly of opinion, that
if there was do agyeetnent to forfeit the depwit,
the lirg3in did nat go on between the Plaintitf and
Defendant, it was a void bargain the tnotnent the.
Defendant -had' made it impossible to complete it,
by giving the school to anotlirr ; and theretore'the
Plaintiff was entitled to recoi,er the money he bad
deposited by way of earnest.—Ve t.dia. for the 'Plain •
tiff.—Damages 491 94.
. -

trac>c
Coi'DEN V TIOUL,i`ON.

Mr. GrA4l.lol.lr stated this to be an alit n at. Om
suit nr,a telittuctablu tailor. in this town. against Mr.
George Bottiton, a gentleman whom. he per,tinai:,y
i;new and respeaeti,as he had no doubt the j y did,
tur he was one; of the, most consider:lli:o ;. -033*-
tt:rs ill the kingdotn.alis:Jaion Wttt. t ,t, iew-
ver a shalt !Atm indeed ; but th( . n the ac-
tion u.ras eiy in:par:apt to I. . ou,lit to
feel themselves iitiktited ' ~r C(otoug
ibrWara in this .• . some years
ago, whir bi0n..,2,1i, 4,,,propietur
of „-:. . ftirk4.--
. . %%due of
= 'itt sent to Ins.
:which
in a pac6..et

. ~ '~~ .

_ ~ _. .. i

~

'r

~~..

~:I;~,:

•

r . '~

.

' •ar s o the auutert, h a Aet-
rttr specirying the oonfents. All arrited ex:cept the
rring and. the, broach and the Plaintiff lating7fo in-
.fornimi his sister, called at the office, where he
'was treated with an insolence ''Which required to be
corre6ted, and which nobody would be more •ready,'
to 'do than Mr. Boulton, when .he became properly
informed of it. The Plaintiff, he said, having called
to state that the contents of this parcel were lo3t,was
told at the coach office, " Oh F you stole it your-
self." " No, that I have not what do you mean
by that ?" Oh 1. what then they have gutted it
for you,-- have they ?" Then they laughed in his
face. • It was to -check and clip the wings of this spe-
cies or impudence that this adtton was brought.
It was clearly proved that -this parcel was left by
the Plaintiff at the Defendanescoach-oftice, and that
it arrived with all its contents except
.the ring and
the broach, which made it manifest that they were
stolen out of -the parcel, Upon examining into the
practice of booking parcels, -it appeared -to be much
the habit of the people about these coach-offices to
take the two-pence for booking, and to say to the
person bringing it; " We will book it when we
please.—we have something else to do besides attend-
ing' to your parcel."

'Lord ELLENtionotif;it oliServel, that this inSp-:
lencP must be immediately correeted ; it was the
trot- the book-beeper to hook every parcel in the
presence of the person bringing it; and paying for
the hooking, whose dial/ alio it was to see it done,
'to save the cirenitous.course of proving that the per-
son who took it was thccoachmaster's servant,which
might otherwise be difficult, ,and sometimes, ,per. 7
haps impossible.
Mr. l',uu for the- Defendant, disputed none of
the tads; nor did headdress the-Jury, bittlut the
.Matter upon a point oflaw—whether the Defendant
was liable in this case for the less-of this parch 1,
when there was stuck up in .his coach-office, in a
conspictions place, a.board,- signifying that the pro-
prietors would net be answerable- for the loss of any
parCel; however small, it it contained money, plate,
or jewels. .• •
Lord •ELLtictiotouoit, having observed the print-
ed bill of the coach-office, giving an aceoubt
the coatihes that go from thence, and
.giving the
~u,nal caution only;, that the proprietors would not
be answerable for any parcel above the value of 51.
unless entered and. paid for according, withoutton
taioinehe e:tcepliup about jel,Vels, &o. was.
clearly Of opinion that the printed bill controuled the
circa of the board, and dispensed with lhe necessity
of persons CoMing there with parcels reading. it, for
that the printed bill of the office must be taken to
Contain the'eonditnins on which business was done
at the otlice,':and if these terms were inconvenient
to- coach-masters; it behoved them to alter their
bills, that the public might not be misguided. Mr.
Bonito') Would do well to inquire into what hands
this parcel catne in the Coach-office, and if he founA
him out to charge him.with a felony. Something
of this sort was much wanting, in places ofthis kind,
for it might check the depredations of thieves, too
Many of whom attend the' inn-yards:
'Verdict for the Plaiutiti—aamt!ges 11,125.
WATKINS V. WILSON".

• The Plaintiffs a tailor in London. The Defend.;
ant, aged 17, is a Lieutenant ofthe Royal Marines;
came up from Carmarthen with his lather, to go to
Portsmouth to etubitrk, and did so. Bile at-Ports-
mouth, he sent for • some clothes, with which the
Plaintiff' furnished him flO 141 LOndon,
of 91. ifig. to the atuount
The defence was infancy. The Plaintiff 'replied
that they were neeess.iry. The Defendant's fa-.
ther proved, that he cautioned the Plaintiff against
trusting the boy; who wanted nothing,. fur he watt
stockers with clothes for a twelvemonth's voyage.
Lord: kl.LENltottonOn thought as this youth w.ts
not, in want of any thing, nothing could be necessary
tor him and that the PlaintitYhaving had this notice
'not to trust the youth, ought to be held to the rigid
rule of la kt, , which provided that no intalat should be
answerithlelor thing-that was not ahsOlutay ne-
essarY.---"Vartlict for; Defendant.

. . , • MAY 17.
GOODE V. HILL.
The Plaintiff and Defendant were both horse=
deniers. The Defendant had' sold 'the Plaintiff a cart_
horse at. Croydon lair, which after some days fell off
hi% feet and died of a consumption. The Plaintiff
said he had only it grass cold. This atinin was
brought upon Cie warranty. The witnesses for the
Plaint:4f said, that the horse watt ill; t, the time it was
sold. thinlte hit been ridden about
the 'fair; and *Went home very well on the same
evening and ate very he:wtily and was '..e1l 'far some
days. T,he Plaintiff's witnesses also previniciited4 goed
deal,'aft to the use that had been made of the 'horse
after-the sale, and olie of therb, who .as a soft 'of
partne.r with the Detendantodmitted that the'Plain.
tiff had always kept verrfaithful to WS warranties..—
The Plaintiff hod olsp made a different rspresenta-
lien in a letter to S itt. Delenditrit,,of a material fad,
and.upun tltc Whole or the evidence, Lord • ELLEN -
Botiou6n, being uloottion`witil the Defendant, the
Plaintiff was nonstitted by con,...ent,
•
OLD ILI/LEY.

r
tircurnstzneg of ttfel•prlsoners frailt4 legt tnir
ings.iirr the purpose of vommitting
.t robbery, and
ko,,t heir return with be isr.6pertyot th.e-proletf4.
.1-le also conveyed the tittle-piece tot Le, 1)ou'oe cif the,.
elder Ware, by the desire Of -0;:lre. • .•
Joel Ware,. ThOnias flohnit; alias I,acey, and;
John Faller, were follnd guilty—Death; and David •
Wire WM acquitted.
him; was cotiviaed of stealing a watch and
other property from 'JOhn M'Currnac, in April last,,,
iu the parish of St. Gilds. -
Pichaffi Watts was indi&ed -fo; stealing a slitep,'•
the property of Wm. Matthew*, flout off Fuichley ,
Common, in April last. 'l'be prisoner was.the ser-
!ant of. Mr. Grimaldi, whO'has.a house in t!,iit v.t. ,
Cinity, and ofThred the skin of the -sheep stolen tiara
ltaithews, with five others, for sale. Solue, fii,-
picions having arisen, however,. front the: skins be
ing cut -And disfigured`, the prisOner was taken up,
when the prosecutor, along with several of licr 'per-
sons, identified the skins of sheep 'which they
'lost. l'he prisoner was tbood.gailty.—Death •
Six other mdiaments were preferred against bilis%
13,tu being convided of
.the first, they were with-
drawn. • , •

T?:1