The Sun.
London, England, 1836-11-01 00:00:00

30, STRAND.

H E IRISH DRAGOON.
Ain—Mrs. O'Daisy.
When first for Ould England I left Killarney,
And footed it merrily over the sea—
The folks they so bother'd me all with their blari:ey
I wish'd myself hack with sweet Judy M'Cree;
But I hit of a honey, who sipped me some money,
And 'listed me, faith t in the twink of an eye
A loyal dragoon soon I strutted so funny,
And devil a soul was so merry as I.
A pair of jack boots, oh ! they bade me be chilling,
As rough as a badger their surfaces were;
" But, arrah !" says I, " and what is It you're maning
Botheration ! I never can palish these here.
That soon they convineed me of sense I was lacking,
Apd wrkort half up to the best of their fun ;
For SparFe had.. riir•trti 'on with Warren's Jet Blacking,
Ere they spew' Rate 4iatHrgy g 4 bript as the sun.
0,1 thought 'teas Ould Nick, that doceatfpl rzu1.944P1
gad plat' nip Polite trick, and the phi; was his'qwil
list I learned him }l4e_piliture that drill'd the battalion',
'Two the beauty of Warren's hi Blacking alObe;
Sot wry the fape each' lass bat paesei,
On both my jack boots; end, no otigof !otitis
When I visit Killarney, the swatelrish lasses
Will simper and sigh for the Irish Oragoon
This Easy-shining and Brilliant Blacking prepared by ROBERT
WARREN, 3C, Strand, London; and sold in every Town in the Unitai
Kingdom.
1.1:04d, in Bottles, and Paste Blacking, in Pots, thll2d., and IPd. each.
Be particular !() inquire for Warren's, 30, Strand; all others are
c,'

PRICES OF LEATmat.
Per lb. d. to (I. 1 Per lb al. to cl.
Crop Hides, 30 to 4011) each 12 In !Horse Hides, (lerman 1 22
- -411 tio - Spanish
50 60
Bull Hides
liutts, Vitriol - -- 30 6(‘ s2l 2,
--- English..... l3 23 I ---- 70 100
-- t °reign
Foreign Hides ln 12 I-- small l6 17
messing Hides
------- Shaved .... 14 17 i Basile 7 14
Ele.t Saddlers lilies
Horse Hides, English
• If rounded 2.1. to 4d per lb snore

Yesterday the Revising Barristers, Messrs. COVENTRY
and KEEN, resumed their labours for this county, at the
Court of Requests, Osborne-street, Whitechapel.
Mr. KEEN revised the objections on the lists for St.
George's-in-the-East, Wapping, &c. Previously to proced-
ing to them, he gave several judgments.
The claim of Dr. Simmonds for a life interest of more
than 10/. upon Staines Church was admitted.
Messrs. Mardow and Blackburn having claimed (in the
St. Leonard, Shoreditch, list, and the latter in St. James's,
Clerkenwell), in respect of their freehold office of Dissent-
ing ministers, _ _

Mr. KEEN delivered judgment thereon, and erased the
names.

As to the other case, that of Mr. Blackburn, Minister
of Claremont-chapel, it came before him under very diffe-
rent circumstances, In this case there was not only proof
of the. Minister holding the freehold office, but the trust
deed was produced, by 'which it appeared that one of the
trusts was to pay the Minister an annual stipend not ex-
ceeeding 4001. till debts were paid, when 6001. might be
voted. The debts had been paid off, and the stipend was
6001. arising from the pew rents of the chapel, which was
fehold. The objections that had been raised, in his opi-
nion, did not bring the claim within the operation of the
28&I sect., &c. He, therefore, under all the circumstances,
considered that his claim must be allowed.

..flowing is thoisiptof the day's proceedings :
7.,..,,,,,,ftti0n b ,
Overseers. Con vay tives. Radicals.
Parishes. Total. Sustained. Total. Sustaihed. Total. Sustained.
Milc.end Old/ 24 ...... 11 19
Town
Bethnal-green.. 33 - r 2
St. Botolph, '1 i
' 6 - 4
I
A Idgate. 5 a
Mile-end New
Norton Folgate. 0
St. r gorge sinl 22
15 3
the East 5
We. ping
St. Mary, i„
16 7
Whitechapel a'
St. Luke's, x 1 3
Spitalfields '
Ti inity,
Minories

0

Ohl Artilleryl 1
Ground

105
• Three cases stand over.

EAST SURREY.
PARISH OF LAMBETH, OCT. 31.—Objections by Over.
seers.—Sustained, 16 ; failed, 4 ; adjourned, 3 ; total, 23.
Objections by Reformers.—Sustained 2 ; failed, none
total, 2.

Objections by Tories.—Sustained, 17 ; failed, 25 ; t0ta1,42

GREENWICH.:
The Revising Barristers, Mr. BROCKMAN 'and Mr.
CHAMBERS, opened 'their Courts here yeAerday at the
Mitre Tavern. The first case of- importaneo was -tkat of
Mr. Henry Emery, who claimed to be oa the list In respect
,of a house which he occupies in his Majesty'S Victualling-
Tard, at Deptford •
The case of Mr. John Brown, the surgeon et,the
tualling-yard,, was. previotisly, gone into, and, was =in:-every
respect similar to that,of Emery, except' that-he -.had not
leceived any sum in lieu of rent andliving outside 4be yard.
Mr. Daniel Paine, the collector of poor-rotes fcir
Paul's, Deptford, said that: the 'names of .Mr..kßroWn.and
Mr: hmery.werc both:regularly..entered in the. rate-book
but he had never applied to them :for any rate.. He has
been in the habit of making .out the rate..and. sending, it-
down to the Victualling-yard, where it. was checked by the
proper officer,. and he afterwards received the amount bf
the whole of the houses rated in the yard from Mr. Os-
well, the principal clerk in the store-keeper's office.
The cases excited considerable interest, inasmuch as all
the Victualling-yard officers are to be determined by them.
They stand over to be argued before the Barristers, on the
adjourned day.

HERTFORD.—BARNET.
(Before Mr. FISH.)
DECISION.—THE NEW RIVER COMPANY.

Mr. Fisx gave judgment this morning in the case of Mr.
Astell and Mrk.Plicke, wbig.h,were argued before 40 on
ict 7 insi-litsflit.iiith, at ITeriford.

At the conclusion, the Learneißarrister said, on the
ground that the share (in respect of which Mr. Astell claims
to remain on the list) is possessed by him as a member of
a Corporation aggregate, and not as an individual, I think
that the objection must prevail, and that his name must be
struck out. Mr. Astell has not confined his qualification
to his interest in New River shares, but has also claimed in
respect of freehold in certain redeemed land tax ; but, as
far as I understand the facts applicable to this part of the
case, the land tax was redeemed by the money of the Com-
pany, and if that be so, then the same objection applies as
much to this subject-matter of qualification, as to the in-
terest in the New River shares—viz, that it is corporate
property, and that Mr. Astell's right to it is as one of the
members of the Corporation, and not as an individual.
The decision in Mr. Asteil's case will dispose of a great
variety of cases similar in Great Anwell.

The case of Mr. Blicke (continued Mr. Fish) is different
from that of Mr. Astell, Mr. Blicke not being a member of
the Company ; but beirtg merely interested as a share-
bolder,-and, as such, entitled to the participation of the pro-
fits of the undertaking. The objection, therefore, that Mr.
Mae is claiming to vote in respect of property to which
he is entitled as a member of a corporaticm aggregate, does
not apply. It is objected, however, That his right to re-
main on the list cannot be supported, as be stands in the
situation merely of a oPsitt4i qit trust, and is not in posses-
sion of the estate in respect of which ,he claims within the
meaning of the 28d see, of W. IV., c. 45., but that such
estate is in the possession of the company. who stand in
the situation of trustees for Mr. Blicke, and are in the re-
ceipt of the rents and profits thereof. I am of opinion,
therefore, that the objection is a valid one. I shall there-
fore expunge his name and the names of several others who
stand in a similar situation.

These decisions will upset the claims of a great number
of Tories.