The Sun.
London, England, 1849-07-21 00:00:00

NEV7POILT.

Beef, from 2s 6d to 3s 6d; Mutton, 3s to 3s 10d;
Lamb, 4s 4d to 5s Od; Veal, 3s 2d to 3$ 10d; and
Pork, 3s 2d to 4s per 81b.

IVELITECHALPEZ.

Beef, from 2s 4dt(73s6TlTriato773s Od to 3s 10d;
Lamb, 4s to 5s ; Veal, 3s to 3s 8d; and Pork, 3s to
3s 10d per 81b3.

BILLINGSGATE.

Salmon, 6d to is Id per lb.; Turbots, 5i to 7s 6d;
Brills, Is 3d to 2s 2d; Cod Fish, 2s 6d to 63; Whitings, 4d
to 8d; Lobsters, 8d to 23 6d; and Crabs, 4d to 2s each;
Soles, 8d to 2s 6d per pair; Eels, 4d to is per ib;
Mackerel, 4d to 9d each ; Flounders, is Od to is 4d per
dozen ; Haddocks, 4d to 7d each; Scate, 7d to 9d per
lb; White Bait, is per quart.

BREAD.
The prices of Wheaten Bread in the Metropolis are
from, 7d to 7id; of household ditto, 5d to 6-id per 41bs
loaf.

HIDE IVIATLICET.

Market hides, 56113760:,TicTToTid; ditto, 641 b to
721 b, lid to 2d; ditto, 721 b to 801 b, 2d to 21d; ditto,
801 b to 881 b, 21d to 20; ditto, 881 b to 961 b, 24d to 3d;
ditto, 961 b to 1041 b, 3d to 3id; ditto, 1041 b to 1121 b, 3id
to 4d; Calf Skins, each, 4s 6d to ss; Lamb Skins, is 6d
to 2s 6d; llorse.Hides, 7s 6d; Shearlings, Os 7d to Os 10d.

IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT.
(THIS DAY)

HOUSE OF COIVEVIONS.
The.SPEAKER took the Chair shortly atter Tvrclve
o'clock.

NEW WI 11. Foa LONDON.
Mr. BIIOTHERTON moved that the Speaker should
issue a new writ for the City of London, in the room of
J:IMPS Pattison, E:q., deceased.—Agreed to.
The report on Hudson's Divorce Bill was further con-
sidered, and agreed to.
After the presentation of several petitions,
Mr. J. O'CONNELL called the attention of her
Majesty's Government to the charge of the coroner at
the inquest on the persons killed in the late affray be-
tween the Orangemen and Catholics in the neighb.,ur-
hood of Castlewellau, and asked whether the Govern'
ment would lay on the table a corre.spondence on the
subject, and whether the Government had sanctioned
the protection given to the Orangemen by the armed
police ?

- Sir G. GREY said tha charge of the coroner had not
been brought under the notice of the Government, and
with respect to the police, their endeavours were to pre-
serve the public peace, and not protect one religious
party against another.
HUNGARY.
On the motion that the report of the Committee Of
Ways and Means be brought up, •
Mr. B. OSBORNE rose to move, pursuant to notice,
for any papers connected with the advance of the Russian
troops into the kingdom of Hungary. It had generally
been supposed that Hungary was part of Austria, and
not an independent state; the contrary was the fact.
Hungary had been always an oasis of liberty in the land
of despotism. The kingdom of Hungary was first joined
to Austria under Ferdinand the First; but at that time
Hungary had a free constitution settled upon her. The
Honourable and Gallant Member entered at some
length into the history of Hungary, and to the
events that had lately taken place in that country, ob-
serving that Ferdinand IL, in 1848, granted to Hungary
an independent Constitution, but perfidiously broke that
guarantee in 1849. He maintained that the present Em'
peror, Francis Joseph, was now an usurper of the king-
dom of Hungary. He was a mere puppet in the hands
of his mother, who was at the bottom of all the in-
trigues of the Court of Austria with Russia. He con-
tended that the movement in Hungary was not con-
nected with that of France, for it had been going on for
the last thirty years. The aristocracy of Hungary was
an aristocracy in its best sense; they had always been
the leaders of the people. Who was it proclaimed the
liberty of the press in Hungary? Louis Kossuth, and
for that he was condemned to four years' imprisonment-
That man stood now in the proudest position of any
man probably in the world.—(Hear, hear.) He stood
in the position of Washington, the supporter of civil
and religious liberty.—(Hear, hear.) The Noble Lord
at the head of the Government had on a former occa-
sion used the word insurrection with respect to the
Hungarian movement.

Lord JOHN RUSSELL said that in using that term
he might have made use of an improper term, but in
using it he did not mean to say whether that insurrec-
tion was justified or not.—(Hear, hear.)
Mr. OSBORNE resumed. What had been the con-
duct of Austria, that had been called a paternal Govern-
ment? Why, it had bombarded Venice and Milan, in
Austria, and Presburg and Pesth in Hungary.—(Hear,
hear.) The present was not a mere struggle for Hun-
garian independence; it was a stuggle between
despotism and independence.—(Hear, hear.) Ile
thought it became the country to look about.
They had passed an Alien Bill, but what was the result?
They had aliens in this country in the shape of foreign
Ministers, who had agents in the other House of Parlia-
ment to do their dirty work in this.—(Hear, hear.) The
people of the country felt satisfied with the course pur-
sued by the Secretary of State fir Foreign Affairs, and
that they deeply sympathized with a noble nation
struggling for its liberty. The Hon. Member concluded
by moving for any papers connected with the advance °f
Russian troops into the kingdom of Hungary.—(cheers.)
Mr. M. MILNES, in seconding the motion, said amid
all the convulsions going on in Europe, there was no'
thing to induce the House to believe that any consider-
able mutation in the territorial disposition of Conti:
newel States which might take place would at all vane`
in importance that which was involved in the
question
before the House. What was the war between Austriaand Hungary but a contest of the most despotic nature
on the part of Austria? So long as this question re-.
Instilled a civil war, the analogy between it and our great
civil war remained complete. The object of this war wag
clearly to merge the national existence of Hungary it °,
a mere provincial existence, dependent on Austria.
was impossible for any energy on the part of the Hun'
garian people to prevent that extinction of their nation!.
existence, seeing that they had to contend against this
immense alien force involved in that Russian inters:en"
tion. This was really and truly a national question,
and not a democratic or an aristocratic one. 31!•
Bathyanni, the Foreign Minister of Hungary, who
was an intimate friend of his (Mr. M. Mibleef)i
and a man of immense wealth, had risked his whole all
in this patriotic attempt to give freedom to his country.
and should he not succeed the whole of his immense pro'
perty, and it might be his life, might be the penalty he
would would have to pay. No republic, or even republicsn
form of government, was at any time ever declared 10
Hungary; but the present political state was simply
regency, at the head of which was that remarkable man;
Kossuth, and which was acknowledged by the Diet, and
declared simply to be an interregnum of a provisional
character, which might be put an end to at any mo•
went by a constitutional election to the Crown
of Hungary of any person whomsoever. lie did be'
lieve this question was one which wo should hear of iD
future years. He believed it to be a question in which
was involved the principle of rational liberty. Non'
intervention pre-supposed a state of peace; and the
question was how the peace of Europe was to be pre-
served? Not, as his Noble Friend (Lord Palmerston),
supposed, by tinkering up tho quarrels of the states of
Europe, oniby making the evils of the day sufficient
for the day. Prince Metternich on one occasion said,
that he was not a prophet but a physician, and be
clearly foresaw that the disease with which Europe was
afflicted would one day prove fatal. He concluded by
seconding the motion.
Mr. ROEBUCK said with international law we had
not now to deal ; for it was a kind of international
morality, and must be regulated by international policy
Unfortunately, the Emperor of Russia was not the
only person who had been guilty of this
intervention.—(Dear, hear.) The Republic of France
waslfound infringing the non-intervention, and in their
attack on the people of Rome they were as greatly cul-
pable as the despot of Russia. The deliberations in
that House at that moment would never reach the
ears of the people of Russia ; and, perhaps,
not even of Hungary, under the despotism to which
they were subject. This was, therefore, a question to
be taken up vigorously by the Government. He be-
lieved our people had a sympathy with their fellow's in
the world, and had a desire to see good government
spread all over the world, and the banner of des°
potism trampled under foot, whether that ban-
ner waved over the armies either of Russia or
of France.—(Cheers.) Greece had arisen up in insur-
rection against our old ally, and mostly indebted aro the
people of Greece to this country for establishing their
present King on the throne. If, then, we interfered its
that case, he asked now, in a much greater case, %TV!
we were to he passive in this most despotic and tyranniol;
intervention on the part of Russia? The Emperor °I
Russia once in Hungary, or once at Constantinople, hold
soon might he interfere in our Indian empire, and hokw,
soon might he be in Egypt or Syria; and how soon might
we be involved in war with him; for our highway t°
India lay through the Red Sea ?—(Hear, hear.)
He contended that the people of this country had
most direct interest in this question, and he contended
this was an English question. He asked, therefore,
the Noble Lord the Secretary of State for Foreign
Affairs to employ the moral power of this great count*?
in the settlement of this question.