The Sun.
London, England, 1825-08-13 00:00:00

[TILE TIMES.]

The spirit of Combination among journeymen
seems, from the Paris Newspapers, to have ex-
tended itself to France. Thousands of work-
men engaged in the cotton-manufactures near
Rouen, in Normandy, have not merely left their
work as with us, but have gone some steps fur-
ther—attacked their employers, demolished the
windows of their factories, and resisted the
troops and gendarmerie who attempted to reduce
them to tranquillity. Bad lessons, we see, are
easily learned. But it is curious enough that the
rival manufacturers of France and England
should present simultaneous exhibitions of this
nature. No doubt, if the masters over the whole
civilized world could agree to raise the wages of
their journeymen at one and the same moment;
each might preserve his place in the general com-
petition, relatively to all his neighbours. It
is clear, however, that the manufacturing ca-
pitalist who accedes to an increase of wages,
while his brethren elsewhere decline to grant it,
must lay his account for being less able to sup-
port a competition in the general market than he
had been before. If, therefore, wages be raised
in England, and not in France, French manu-
factures will thrive to a greater extent than
they now do, at the expence of the English ;
and some of our capitalists must return to the old
standard, or dismiss their hands, and suspend
or lay aside the business. If the manufac-
turers of both nations proceed pari passu, and
give up to their workmen a share of their
own existing profits, the relation between France
and England may not be changed ; but the
Netherlands, Germany—nay, North America
—will step in for a larger portion of the ex-
port trade than formerly. '[hence may arise a
persuasion in the minds of Flemish, German, &c.,
journeymen, that their masters retain an undue
share of profit beyond that which the capitalists
of England and France enjoy : so combina-
tions will take place among tLe " Operatives "
of Germany and Flanders, and either their
wages must be increased, or the French and Eng-
lish lowered. Perpetual fluctations are display-
ing themselves where labour and capital exercise
equal freedom; but if violence be permitted
with impunity, the result is no longer amenable
to fixed calculation.

LMORNING lIERALO.3
We see that the tithe-cause gentlemen are be-
ginning, to stir. again, 'respecting. Henry the

Eighth's Act, by which was given 2s. 9d. in the
pound to the Clergy of certain parishes. The
Rev. Mr. Owen, of St. Olave, has addressed a
letter to his flock, calling upon it to reimburse
him for the expence part of the said flock put him
to, in calling in question his proportion of the
claim to the said tithe. Some of the flock seem
to think that this letter of the Doctor's is merely
a prelude to telling them that he would like to re-
ceive the whole of the 2s. 9d. It is by no means
improbable but that the flock is correct in its sup-
position, and that such are the Clergyman's inten-
tions. But why should he ❑ot claim the
2s. 9d. ? Is i►e not entitled to it by an
Act of Parliament ? One of the Doctor's oppo-
nents is a medical Gentleman of (he name of
Hill. Now, if Henry the Eighth had made an
Act in favour of the medical interests of St.
Olave's parish, would Mr. Hill be for rescinding
such Act ? We do not know whether there is any
solicitor opposed to the Rev. Divine ; hut if there
he, and the Doctor were to ask him if he would
give way in any professional bill he might have
against the Doctor, so far as the 6s. Bd., 13s. 4d.,
and other legal fees were concerned, what would
the solicitor say ? Since the, failure on the
part of the Civic Body to prevail on the
Ministers to second them in their endeavours to
mulct the respective City Shepherds of as much as
they could of the 24. 9d. in the pound, not only
Dr. Owen, Mr. Wilson, and the rest of the City
Pastors appear to have taken courage, and are
determind to resist any farther encroachment of
their flocks ; but it is probable, that as the Pas-
tors have seen that the Ministers and the Parlia-
ment will not interfere, the whole of the 2s. 9d.
will gradually be laid hold of. Now the flocks
have, in a great measure, to thank themselves for
this unexpected termination of the affair.' We
thought at one period, after having read the splen-
did effusions of certain of the City orators, that the
Pastors were beginning to give way that they
were apprehensive of the consequences of the
Civic effusions. In one or two instances compro-
mises were made ; and the Pastors agreed to de-
viate from the Act. The rock on which the
patriotic portion of the Civic Body split, was the
Catholic cause. When the Catholic cause was
agitated, and the Catholic Barristers, in con-
junction with Sir Francis Burdett, Mr. Plun-
kett, and Mr. Croker, stipulated that a provision
for the Catholic priesthood should be made—at
that time the patriotic portion of the Civic
Body held its tongue ; there was not a speech,
not a word escaped the civic lips, not-an iota in
opposition to such a montrous proposition.—
Though there was such a bare-faced, proposition,
yet, because the civic patriots had embarked in
the Catholic cause, and liecause this payment of
the Catholic priesthood was to be understood as
being part of the Catholic cause, so rivetted were
they to the Catholic cause, that they never uttered
a syllable—not one specimen of speechifyiug.Now
did the Civic Body think that the people of Eng-
land did not observe this silence, when it was so
impudently proposed to fasten on the country, the
very first year of Catholic Emancipation, a new
clerical establishment of 250,0001. ? Did the
Civic Body think that the Civic Pastors did not
observe the dilemma into which the Civic patriotic
portion of, the Civic Body had brought the Civic
flocks. But the fact is, that the people, as well
as the Civic Pastors, saw it; and the shepherds
have recovered from the panic into which the
City speeches had thrown them. The Pastors
now see that the flocks have no chance. The
Civic Patriots abandoned the Civic flocks in a
critical moment. They did not object to a Catho-
lic Clerical yoke of 250,0001. Why, therefore,
object to the two-and-nine-penny yoke ? The
parishioners of St. Olave's may depend on it
that the Rev. Mr. Owen never would have
brought them into this predicament, of having the
expences to pay him in resisting his demands,
had the City orators stirred in the Catholic
Clerical Wing affair. The Act of Henry VIII.
gives a rate of 2s. 9d. in the pound on every
house in certain parishes to the Rev. Dr. Owen,
Mr. Wilson, and others; and until that Act is
repealed, the flocks inhabiting the houses of those
parishes are liable to pay the 2s. 9d. in the pound
to their Pastors. And it is probable that the
Pastors will levy it. The Medical and Legal in-
terests of those parishes will not abate one tittle
of what the Law allows them. Why, there-
fore, should the Clerical interests ? We shall not
be sorry should the Pastors squeeze from the
patriotic portion of their flocks the uttermost far-
thing. The latter deserve it for their hypocrisy
in making such a fuss about the 2s. 9d. and say-
ing not one word when the Papacy, in conjunc-
tion with the Catholic Legal interests of
Ireland, assisted by Sif Francis Burdett, Messrs.
Plunkett and Croker, were going to fasten on the
country a Clerical Establishment, with which, as
Protestants, we could have nothing to do. Whe-
t-her Dr. Owen, Mr. Wilson, and others, will act
with wisdom in pushing their rights to the extent
the law allows them, time will discover—but in
our opinion, the Clergy of England should pro-
ceed with great caution, lest in the next po-
litical convulsion the tithe system should be
made an end of altogether. Shepherds should
not drive their flocks to desperation. But to
conclude, the parishioners of St. Olave's, and
the parishioners of all the other City parishes,
have to attribute to the silence of the City Ora-
tors in the late Catholic Clerical Wing affair,
the effectual fastening on the several parishes
Henry the Eighth's Act. They neglected to
stir in the Catholic Clerical Wing affair. How,
therefore, can they with any face resist the de-
mands of their own pastors ? Their silence gave
consent to the Catholic proposi►ion—why there-
fore should they think of resisting the Protestant
one ?

SOUTHAMPTON, AUG. 10.—The Theatre on
Monday night was tolerably well attended to see
Mr. KEAN in his favourite character of Richard.
lie was received with deafening shouts by the
pit and upper boxes, which continued a consider-
able space of time, and which he repeatedly
bowed to. After this interruption, 11.7 EAN pro-
ceeded with his performance, of which we shall
only remark, that we recollect what his Richard
was ten years ago. We cannot say the remem-
brance is in-his favour.

TRIAL FOR A LIBEL.

CARLISLE, AUG. 9.
WHEATLEY v. GIBSON AND ,ANOTHEU.

Mr. 'ARMST RONG opened the pleadings. The plaintiff in
this action was George Wheatley, an attorney of the Court of
King's Bench, and the defendants were Robert Gibson, the
printer and publisher, and John Peile, the sole proprietor of a
weekly newspaper called the Cumberland Packet. The plain-
tiff brought his action to recover a compensation in damages
for the injury done to his character by the publication of two,
separate libels upon it in the newspaper which they jointly con-
ducted. The defendants pleaded the general issue, and there-
upon issue was joined.
The action was altogether of so trumpery a nature, from the
insignificant character of the libels, that we should not report
the case, except for the sake of some passages in the speeches
of the two leading Counsel.
Mr. BROTTGIIAM stated, that the defendants in this action
were the proprietors of the Cumberland Packet, a paper which
he recollected ever since he could recollect any thing. It had
formerly been a very inoffensive and a very dull journal ; but
it had recently become very offensive without ceasing to be very
dull. The motto of the paper, which inculcated temperance and
moderation, would not serve the defendants as an antidote to
the libel, which they had disseminated throughout the country.
On the contrary, it would only prove the dulness and aggravate
the malice of those who had written it. It was contained in one
line of poetry, which in point of length and magnitude was su-
perior to any that he had ever met with in the course of his
studies. His learned friend (Mr. Scarlett) and himself were
not so conversant with poetry as a gentleman whom he now had
the pleasure of seeing in Court, (Mr. Wordsworth)—a poet,
who had cast new glory over the county in which he was born,
and whose works would be remembered when he and those whom
he were addressing were consigned to one common corruption.
He thought, however, that even that great poet had never met
with a line which drew after it so long a train of measured
syllables. The line ran thus :—" Where moderation dwells,
the soul admits distinct ideas, and matured debate, an eye im-
partial and an even scale, hence wisdom sound and unrepent-
ing choice." That was such a line as he had never heard of,
except at the end of a fishing rod (a laugh) ; and he should not
be surprised if there were found dangling at the end of it
that which was sometimes—said to be dangling at the other
end of the fishing-rod from that to which the line was
attached.—( A laugh.)—They would, however, learn from
this enormous line what it was upon which this newspaper
particularly piqued itself. It was moderation, distinct ideas,
and matured debate ; and not only that, but an impartial eye,
an even scale, sound wisdom, and unrepenting choice.—( A
laugh)—Now, a motto to a newspaper was like a sign to a
public house ; it portended the cheer that was to be found
within it. The Jury would therefore expect particularly cau-
tious conduct from those who dealt in such large professions
as those which he had' just detailed to them. He would, how-
ever, give them a specimen of the manner in which they car-
ried their professions into practice. The Learned Gentleman
then read the first libel, commenting on it at great length, and
contending that though it was insufferably stupid, yet it was
not the less malignant. It was, he said, an advertisement
to all mankind, or at least to all mankind to whom the Cum?
berland Packet was sent, not to employ such a man as Mr.
Wheatley for their attorney, inasmuch as he was destitute
of all those qualities of'discretion and conduct which it was
essential for an attorney to possess. Such was the first
libel of which his client complained. He then read and
commented on the second libel : and added, that the Jury
would now see the way in which things were conducted by
the polluted part of the press. It was proceedings like these
which brought the public press into disrepute, and rendered
those who were its best friends almost doubtful of the be-
nefits of unfettered and unrestricted discussion. He condemn-
ed in the strongest language the warfare which the public
press had recently carried on against 'private individuals.—
If a public man displeased those who conducted that mighty
engine, he was straightways attacked in his private character;
falsehoods were disseminated with the most active industry,
not only against himself, but against his wife, his children,
his female relations—nay, against the whole circle of his
friends and relations. He was sorry to find that this practice
had crept from the metropolis into the country. He was sorry
to•find that if for private pique, any skulking villain thought
fit to put into the slight slit in the window of Messrs. Pelle
and Gibson, any anonymous slander, those gentlemen were
ready to print it after' the manner, he would not say of their
betters, but of those elsewhere, whom they professed to imi-
tate. If those gentlemen chose, for the lucre of gain, to
print the anonymous slander which was deposited in the
lion's head in their window, they must be made an-
swerable for it, as if they had written it of their own
free will and imagination. For his own part, he would
say that he had a worse opinion of the printer than of. the
write: of anonymous calumny. And why ? Because. the
former gave eagle-wings to the slander which the latter fabri.
cated, and so enabled that which without them would hut " be
horn and die," to fly abroad in every direction. He asked
whether calumnies, such as- the defendants had disseminat-
ed against the plaintiff, could be tolerated with impunity ?
The plaintiff said that they were utterly false, and dared the de-
fendant to justify them. His assertion was confirmed by the
conduct of the defendants, They had pleaded no justification;
and yet, if any part of their story had been true, it would have
been useful to plead it, as it would have gone far in mitigation
of damages; but it was all false and unfounded, and they there.
fore knew better than to attempt to justify it, since a failure in
such a course would have had no other effect than to aggravate
the damages given against them. The purse of the defendants
was strong and heavy. Mr. Peile, besides being the proprietor
of this Newspaper, was employed as the coal-agent to a Noble-
man of great influence in that county. Mr. Gibson was only
the printer and publisher of the paper; but if the two defend-
ants were taken together, he had no doubt that it would be found
that they had a purse strong enough to meet any damages which
they might give to his client, in reparation for his injured cha-
racter.

The Learned. Counsel then called witnesses to prove his case,
among whom was William Wordsworth, Esq., the author of
"The Excursion." He was examined by Mr. Brougham. I
am head distributor of stamps in the whole of the county of
Westmorland, and in the district of Cumberland in which the
Cumberland Packet is printed. I produce an affidavit from the
Stamp-office • also two numbers of the paper—that of the 29th
of March, and that of the sth of April last.
Cross-examined by Mr. SCARLET T.—My Learned Friend,
Mr. Brougham, has alluded to you, I believe, Mr. Wordsworth
as-a gentleman more conversant in poetry than either himself or
me—may, I ask you, have you read the poetical line taken by
this paper for its motto, of which my Learned Friend gave so
flourishing a description !—I have many a time when I was a
boy forty years ago.
When you and I were at Cambridge together, Mr. Words-
worth, should we not, from the rhythm of the syllables, have
vided this enormous line into four verses ? In my younger days
it used to be printed in four lines.
In the course of your poetical studies, did you ever meet with
a line containing so many syllables ?—I did not know that it was
printed as one line till I heard Mr. Brougham say so. I never
met so long a verse in my life.
The papers containing the paragraphs charged as libellous
were handed in, and the paragraphs read by the usual officer;
Mr. SCARLETT then proceeded to address the Jury for the
defendants. In the course of his experience he had seen se-
veral extraordinary actions for libel, but he remembered none
in which the labour of Counsel had been so great, and in which
the libel complained of had been so trifling, as in the present
action. When he reflected on the speech which his Leared
Friend had delivered, and also upon the subject matter of it
he was irresistibly reminded of the mountain in labour, and
the-mouse which it produced. The throes of his Learned Friend
were immense whilst he was endeavouring by his speech to
repel the attack which he said had been made upon his client's
character ; and if he (Mr. Scarlett) had not previously read the
alleged libels, he should never have dreamt that the eloquence
of his learned friend was expending itself on paragraphs so
harmless and insignificant as those which were now submitted
to their consideration. He was thinking in his own mind,
during the time that his learned friend was addressing them,
how often he had seen attacks similar to that mode on the at-
torney, Mr. Wheatley, made upon counsel without any person
thinking it worth his while to complain of them. His learned
friend, amid the difficulties by which lie was beset, in the ma-
nagement of this cause, bad thought fit to wander out of the
record to vent his indignation against what he called the pol-
luted part of the press. What part of the press his learned friend
meant to designate by those expressions he did not pretend to
know ; but probably it was that part of it which differed from
him in political opinions. He should like, however, to ask his
learned friend what part of the press he considered that to be
which had recently accused them both of using.to each other the
language of Billingsgate. He would undertake to vindicate
his learned friend from the charge of having used. such lan-
guage, and he was not conscious that he himself had ever used
it. He would not, however, call the press polluted because it
had made such a charge against him,nor would either his learn-
ed friend or himself think of visiting it with an action at law
because it had bestowed his rebuffs and its reprimands upon
them. Mr. Wheatley, the attorney, however, was more tender
than either himself or his learned friend; he was wrapped up
in cotten, and was so tender that he felt the slightest breath of
reproof wound him to the very core. His learned friend had
been so hampered with the weakness and tenderness which his
client had imparted to his cause, that he must wander out of
his road to abuse the line which formed the motto of the paper
published by the two defendants. His learned friend had re-
presented It as a line as long as that appended to a fishing-rod.
It might be so, according to his learned friend's mode of reed.

ing it ; but he read it as four harmonious and melodious lines;
He said nothing of the poetry which they contained ; but four
lines of verse they were, if lie had ever seen a verse in his life"
Let the Jury read them thus :
" Where moderation dwells the soul admits
" Distinct ideas and matur'd debate :
" An eye impartial, and an even scale—
" Hence wisdom sound and unrepenting choice."
In that University where he and Mr. Wordsworth had the guy-,
fortune to be educated, there would be no doubt that these lifihee,
were four lines of blank verse, whatever doubt there might "ci
as to the fact in that University of which his Learned Friel:
wiiansmtgohbame the d.—
erwefieA laugh,
rigliayininforthmeemd,,id,s,tAotf
any
yich Nr.
rate w,a
will not write four verses in one line."l—His Learned Frien"
who could not allow an opportunity of hitting his political 0E:
ponents to pass by him, had accused the defendants of publis"
ing a very offensive and a very dull paper. He would not Ss;
that their paper was a dull one; but if it were, he would say
much the better for the plaintiff; since the calumny it contain.
would be less read. What was the charge against the plui°,ll
in this libel ? That he had received a reprimand from a Be°
of Magistrates for rudeness and officiohisness. For his ownl/5,
he could not see how words like these could be construed into.
libel libel on the character of an attorney. He had never hear".
stated that it was necessary for an attorney to be the very P.„
1,
ro
of politeness. Why, every man in the profession of the
00°
was busy, bustling, and officious. He himself was so ;
was his Learned Friend. To be officious was to be over zd
ous, and to be over zealous was to be too active. Now e°°,,f,
any man, who had common sense, declare a charge Of coo
ficiousness to be a libel upon a man of common sense •
sides, to say that a man was guilty of .rudeness and uffic,j;
I ousness was not to say any thing libellous. There was °°re
newspaper published which did not every day make ogi,a,
grievous charges than that both against himself ante.
every one of his Learned Friends. Sometimes there Tit
in the newspapers speeches put into his mouth, which of
was not possible that he could ever have made; sow', be
them were of such a nature that if he had made then], 0
should have been ashamed to have held up his head again.be.
a Court of Justice. There were speeches alsd put into `io
mouth of his Learned Friend, which, though he did not hve
them, lie could take his oath that his learned friend haanettpf
uttered. It was but the other day that he was asked in cb
street if it were true, that he and Mr. Brougham had had 5,,t11,0,
a quarrel with each other at Lancaster, that they had throb,
their briefs in each other's faces. On his laughing at suc"
idea, and asking his friend what induced him to put so cilia
a question to him, he was told in reply that such a siorY
appeared in the Courier. His learned friend and he had IT,O
had an angry word with each other in their lives; and if '4ft
did not complain of the newspap rs, when they published o.'o
falsehoods to their disadvantage, why should an attornelere
so angry, when similar falsifications, if they were such, "'"_,,b
published about him ? The Learned Counsel then read throuto
the paragraphs complained of by the plaintiff, and cOntele'the
at great length' that they contained nothing libellous. hit
defendants had said that the plaintiff was so ignorant 0.,,,t0e
profession that he could not sue out a latitat, or serve ril.'see
in ejectment, I admit, said Mr. Scarlett, that he would I,_lo
been damnified in his character as an Attorney; but if,..iho
strike out the words "as an Attorney of the King's 131011
the libel upon him is quite the same as it was before. -I.°
these paragraphs, if they be libellous, which I deny. 11
ha quite as libellous applied to me. as the would be wh..„enoti
plied to this Attorney. The Learned Counsel again conw; po
at considerable length that these paragraphs containteir
reproach upon the honesty, integrity, talent, and 00
tion of the plaintiff. Instead of doing him
.injury- of
were calculated to benefit him in his profession. She
the jury dislike an attorney for being rude and officlool
their behalf? For his own part, he did not know t.e for
he should not like himthe better, if he were rude, 'we the
gaged by his opponents. In conclusion he called urnoo
jury to give their verdict for the defendant, because thesejitlii
' graphs did not affect his character as an Attorney of the ot
Bench.
which
. •
Mr. Baron Iluttocx told the Jury that the question ,
he di
they had to decide was, whether these publications of 14v ill
fendants were published maliciously, so as to warrant te'
inferring that they were intended to injure the plain''.,erel
putation as areattorney. The charge was, that they had
published, and that in consequence of them the plaint' hips"
lost large gains, which otherwise would have accrued L°
and that be had been in otherways much damnified. hiAl
Mr. BROUGHAM interrupted his Lordship, to inf 0,0
that it was laid both ways in the declaration, not 011 q
attorney, but also as a common person.
jurilyir; oßualdrosnayHwlLlLthoecrxinprthoceeierdoepdinioAnsthseuleihbeilswtahseelleaseic.onallitt"
to injure the plaintiff in his individual as well es in hitrieliiv
sional capacity. The chief point in the first paragra,P;i
his Lordship read over was, that the plaintiff had reeelv&ciotir,
primand from a bench of agistrates for rudeness and 07 opts
ness. Now a man might he rude and officious, and Yir
bad attorney. The question therefore came to this—e7'4olol::
imputation made in such a manner as to amount to 1.01110:
imputation against the plaintiff ? If they 'thought thon, her
were calculated to injure him in his business, then.t":44:
libellous in point of law. For his own part, he certainlCrope,
it to be an imputation upon an attorney to impute to n_ITO
want of discretion and gentleness of demeanour, as or
every man with whom he came in contact his enemy; "10
of temper'and discretion, both in an advocate and lu_gre e
ney, recoiled upon the party on whose behalf they:rch
ployed, and did more harm than good to the cause so.3.„'h bei;;,
them forth. He then read the second paragraph, Whi'id the '
explained and so tened the first. In conclusion he told
that if they thought either paragraph libellous, Ver/27,00.3 •
damages would in his opinion satisfy the justice of tuf.tolee"
The Jury considered for a few minutes, and then .t
verdict for the plaintiff—Damages one shilling. -
ifidtJ
Mr. SCARLETT.--.-Is this a case, my Lord,
for ci4
11Ir. Baron HULLOCK.•••-••1 will consider of ; .t. - thin
JO
under the circumstances, it is possible that I may grt,j,
Mr. BnOUGHAM.—If any apology had been off"-fojite
action would never have been brought.
Mr. Baron Hur.LoCIC.—I think your client badly 314
bringing it.

CO
TUE REV. C. CoLToN.—Two gentle' Fir;
Tiverton, who have been for many le:rscoll„
sonally acquainted with the author of " Igea °'"
whose mysterious disappearance has elcoiti,o4sl
much attention, shooks hands with him in
i ) th
about a month since.—(Dorset Chronicle.) do s
It is with regret that we announce "t
e. otoo.ef
of Sir Mic HAEL SHAW STEWART, Baronet, Lordl,llerrici;
of the county of Renfrew. He expired at his sull'acy-
dence, Ardgowan, on Wednesday afternoon, about foil' 0
• 0111
( Glasgow Courier.) ii: ..Ar
About one o'clock yesterday afternoon sjorP,
entered the house of Mr. COTTON,
street, Chelsea, walked into the back parlour, aniuwithil
child was in the room and gave an alarm, he esc,aPeu • •
luable gold watch, chain, and seals, and a gold rig'
COAL MARKET, AUG 12. pries OS
• 0
Ships at Market. Ship sold. nA so Ai
64i Newcastle - - .53i . 309 Rd'''. to
g.
of Ellis-streiett'hooilio.
33 Sunderland - - 30 309;.
a,
COURSE OF EXCHANGE, AUP ia t. r•
Arosteidaro
12 194
Ditto, at Sight
Rotterdam l2 - di,
Antwerp l2 ,‘ 2 , tp,
Rambo' gli 36 15v 21111.
36 /1 °L
Altona 0
gl iCI
Paris,3 Day's sight
Ditto
5° 4
ss° - st
noordeaux, ditto
Berlin
i 0 ss',
Frankfort nit the Main
Pet et sburgh •• . . 9i
96/ - if'
Vienna
, 0 cifdle
.F.• -ft

Trieste 9 As,
Madrid
Cadiz ....... - 37 .00
Bilboa..
56
Barcelona
;eirille
• ••
Gibraltar 31
Leghorn ... .. 07
Geiwa . 45 Venice, Ital. Lis'. -6z 'oi,
Malta .m
1
4 e '
Or
9
Paler o 511
Lisbon
Oporto
49
Rio Janeiro
Bahia t...•. 1. .••4,0
, 0
I) id) liii. . . • 9} Cork 9i per ori( °I
BULLION. 0-
f, .0 , 104
Portugal Golcl.in Coin 4( 1 i n
Foreign Gold, in Bars
•% 0 "
• •::::,
New Doubloons
ZielvweriS)7all:drsard in Bars, — ..............
6". 9;;".:91.1i#
..............--.... e
0, tip
. ;
Printed- and Published for the PRearvrirra'ol-10
Orncr, Vo. 112, Strand, by J. B.'''.