The Sun.
London, England, 1814-12-14 00:00:00

CERTIFWATES—Jan. 3.

R. EveraU, CharL►ury, Oxfordshire, grocer—T. Mingay,
West Smithfield, banker—J. P. Carrich, Sonthamliton,row,
Russell-squat*, merchant.—J.Fallow, Northumberland-street,
Strand, coal-merchant—R. Brown 'Worcester, gloi er—G. D.
Lillington, Birmingham, commission-agent.-
PARTNERSHIPS DISSOLVED.

J. Burnell and S.'Holliday, Leeds, Yor wine-mer-
chants—J. W. H. and G. Hone, Staugate Wharf, Lambeth,
timber and coal-merchants—R. Shaw and It. Fentein, Man=
chester, grocers—J. and-It. Russell, Alhwick, Northumber-
la►id, upholsterers—J. Ingham and B.Sinitli, Mirlield, York-
shire, merchants—H. G. Deacon -and H. Morrell,
.Fleet-
street, stationers—T. H., Robinson, It. Hancock, J. and T.
Cooke, Manchester, merchants—D. and It. Hodges, and T.
Hardwick, Cheltenham, mercers—J. Powell and W. Clissold,
Bristol, wine-merchants—D. Denbigh,G. Wapshott, and
Clark, High-street, Borough, ironmongers—lL-Dickens and
W. Walker, Walness in•Pendletoa, Lancashire, .dyerS—H.
Hay, J. Regnier, and, E. Roche, Newcastle-street, Strand,
printers—J. and T. Gould and J. Woone-, 'Dartmouth, Dc-'
vonshire, ship-agents.

LAW INTELLIGENcE:

COURT OF Cl-a&CERY, DE.c. 13.
"WALTER' V. MAUNDE.

This i►nportai►t cause was brought on, upon an
appeal to the Lord Chancellor, from -the decree
of his Honour the Master of the. Rolls.

the parties are the heirs at law, ex;parte pa-
terna and ex-P arte materna, of the late Sir Ceorge
Booth, who died intestate, leaving immense real
and personal fortune, in the county of Kent, con-
sisting of gavel kind and copyhold, as well as
freehold, in that county, together With , large
estates:in the city and liberties of LOndon.
'The Master of the Rolls had decreed the whole.
of the estates, real and
_personal, to belong to
and, be distributive among the next of kin, or
their representatives bin. the plaintiffs, as heirs,
complain of such a decision, contending for spe7
cial interests and rights.
The heirs -on both sides joined in discontent
with the distribution.

Mr. LEACH, at the rising of the Court, which,
,was at one o'clock, the Lord Chancellor laving to
attend.. at a Council at Carlton House, moved for
an order, appointing a specific day for the hearing
of this cause, owing to the great importance there-
of, and Wished that it could be heard or brought
on to-morrow.

Mr. HART observed, that Sir Samtiel Romilly,
now absent throngh. indisposition, wa engaged.
for some of the parties, with a great ,number of
other Counsel enumerated by him, and therefore
thought a more distant day more convenient, al-
most the whole of the Chancery Bar being en-
gaged in the valise for divers
.branches of the
claimants, and persons interested in, or to be' af-
fected by, thedecisiOn.
His Lordship postponed the hearing till the be-
ginning of nest

IN THE VICE-CHANCELLOR'S COURT.
MULLAR V..SPENCEP"

This was the case of a Gentleman, the plaintiff,
returning from his Majesty's service- in the arniy,
in foreign parts, since his infancy, and by his bill
praying a Writ of Partition to gain ,his coparee—
nary share of certain estates situate in the cou►tty
of Northumberland, and descended front the coin-
mon ancestor of the plaintiff stud defendants, who
are cousins-german. The defendants.denied the
returning heir. tj) he genuine, and charged him
with being fictitious. His legitimacy was fully
proved by the cleArest evidence.—Decree for the
plaintiff. ,‘..

COURT OT' KING'S BENCH, Dec. 13, ISI4.
MEYER V. GIEBON.

Th;s was.an action' of slander, for accusing the
plaintiff of keeping an- infamous house at Nirap-
ping-, and of robbing people there in.the night,
and tueniug them out in thA morning. The de-
f:mdant justified, ancrit appeared that t 4 plaintiff
did keep such a 'hciuse, where the most profligate
scenes were exhibited under.the pretence of balls.
Lord ELLENBOROUGH‘ asked .the plaintiff's Conn-,
sel if they-chose• to have 'this recorded by a ver-
dict ; and they accordingly gaye :up the cattse.—
His Lordship enquired why the, neighbours had
•
not represented this place to the Magistrates, to
induce them to take away the plaintiff's license.
If they will hot do their duty," added he,. "
will dszYmine."—Nonsuit.