The Sun.
London, England, 1831-12-12 00:00:00

THE CATECHISM OF HEALTH ;

To which are added, Facts on the Nature, Treatment,
and Cure of Cholera. By A. B. GRANVILLE, M.D.
F.R.S. &c. In a small volume, price only ss.
" This cheap and useful little volume exhibits in a clear and
distinct manner the various modes by which health and vigour
of constitution may be preserved. The practical remarks upon
the management and care of children, in particular, will be found
invaluable to mothers."—Morning Post.
Also, just ready,
MEMOIRS of CELEBRATED MILITARY
COMMANDERS.

By the Author of ;‘ Darnley," " Philip Augustus," &c.
Three vols. post Svo.
Including Henry V. of England, John Duke of Bedford,
Gonzalves de Cordoba, Ferdinand Duke of Alva, Oliver
Cromwell, the Great Conde, General Monk, Duke of
Albemarle, Marshal Turenne, the Duke of Marlborough,
Prince Eugene of Savoy, the Earl of Peterborough, Mar-
quis of Granby, General Wolfe, &c.

BEAUFOY'S CHLORIDES are NOT
liable to STAMP DUTY. The Venders of
BEAUFOY'S CHLORIDES are consequently exempt
from Stamp-office Informations.
South Lambeth, London, Dec. 6, 1831.

PURSUANT to a Decree of the High
Court of Chancery, made in a cause wherein JOHN
PAYNE the Elder is the Plaintiff,,pnd HIS MAJESTY'S
ATTORNEY-GENERAL"WILLIAM CHARLES, and
Others, are Defer.tiant!mple• Creditors of FRANCES
TOMS, late of ttie,,ln,lYailig of St. Cuthbert in Wells,
in the County of Sc4lieriiit, Widow, (who died on the 11th
of July, 1828), "rot to come in and prove their debts be-
fore Henry Martin, Esq. one of the Masters of the said
Court, at his Chambers in Southampton-buildings, Chan-
cery.Lne, London, on or before the 12th day of January,
1832 ; or, in default thereof, they will be peremptorily
excludtd the benefit of the said Decree.
RICHARD BURMAN, 49, Doughty-street,
Plaintiff's Solicitor.

IMPERIAL ROYAL ILLUMINATED PLAYING
CARDS.
and J. FULLER most respectfully solicit
Li* the patronage of the Nobility, the Gentry, and the
Public, to their new invented and much admired Playing
Cards. To reject the barbarous and unmeaning portraiture
which have hitherto constituted the Courts of our Playing
Cards, and to lay before the Public their old and favourite
amusement in a form instructive, elegant, and suited to
the age, are the motives of the Inventor.
The Courts of these Cards are the Portraits of the four
great contending Powers who lived in the fifteenth century,
with their Consorts and their Ministers, and are illustra-
tive of the History of that Period ; they are elegant in
their Costume, and from Pictures of those celebrated
masters, Titian, Holbeins, and others, who lived at the
time, and the Aces correspond with the Court Cards by
being illustrated with the orders and the regalia of the re-
spective Courts they are made to represent.
Made and Sold by S. and J. Fuller, Paying Card
Makers, 34, Rathbone-place, London.
Superior Mogul and Harry Playing Cards, with various
Coloured Backs.

WAKEFIELD CORN MARKET.-Dec. 9.
There is a short supply supply of Wheat both from the farmers
and up the river, this morning, some quantity of the arrival noted
below having got up after market last week ; there has been a
fair demand for good New Wheat and last week's prices are fully
suppotted, but stale old samples are very dull sale. Good New
Oats are not plentiful, and are taken off at the rates of last
Friday. Fine heavy Barley obtains last week's prices, but light
and ordinary samples are very unsaleable. Beans are Is. per
quarter lower. Rapeseed is offering at less money, but little
progress can be made in sales.'
Wheat, Red, Norfolk and Suflblk -s. 555. to 58s. fine 625.
------- Lin. and Cam. -s. 535. to 595. fine 61s.
- ---- Yorkshire -s. 565. to 595. fine 61s.
- White -s. 595. to Gds. fine 675,
.----- Foreign, Red -s. 455. to 535. fine 61s.
White -s. -s. to -s. fine 665.
Barley, Norfolk and Suffolk
--- Lincolnshire . 3ss. to 395. fine 41s.
-- Yorkshire Wold 36s. to 395. fine 41s.
--- Foreign -s. to -s. fine -s,
Beans, Small
- Tick
Oats, Potato 24s. to 265. fine 275,
- Poland -s. 225. to 255. fine 265.
--- Friesland and Small
- Mealing lld. to 12%d. per Stone.
Shelling 3ss. to 365. Od. per Load.
Malt 955. 445. fine 465. per I.oad.
20/, Os. 22/. Os. 241. Os. per Last,

Rapeseed ...,

SCOTCH MARKETS.

the present, would acknowledge the justice of this
course. Indeed it was a. fatal mistake, but as it
arose from error, let no censure be cast on him.
This was an important crisis. From the period of
the expulsion of the Stuarts and the Revolution,
none had occurred in which the liberty and hap-
piness of this people were more deeply involved.
In this great struggle, success did not depend on
Parliament or the King, but on the wisdom, deci-
sion, and determination of the people.—(Cheers.)
He would exhort them to consider this a question of
vital interest, but they must proceed in a manner to
do honour to them as freemen and Christians. Suc-
cess was certain, unless melancholy divisions amongst
Reformers vanquish them. If true to themselves,
if-a fraternity of-feeling animated them, they must
succeed. Let them think of Reform as a mighty
era in the destinies of this country, and prove
to posterity they could appreciate and were de-
termined to transmit those franchises which their
ancestors had handed down to them.—(Cheers.)
He (Mr. Western) was come from Parliament,
where he had heard the King deliver a speech more
like that of an honest Englishman, more befitting
the father of his people, more truly satisfactory, than
any he had ever listened to.—(Cheers.) If fears
were excited by the delay opposed to Reform in the
House of Lords, let those
.fears be banished by the
gracious speech of his munificent Majesty.—(Great
cheering.) He (Mr. Western) could hardly ven-
ture to touch on the conduct of the Peers Temporal
and Spiritual.—(Cries of " Give it them.") No;
he must endeavour to forget their unstatesman-like
conduct. What, oppose the King, the people, the
House of Commons, arid the real aristocracy of the
kingdom ? For the last seventy years the Peerage
has been in the possession of the Tories. It had
been filled on their principles, if principles they can
be called. The Lords had been injured by the Tory
dynasty. They did not understand the people of
England, nor their rights—their constitutional, in-
herent rights. Reform, passed by an immense ma-
jority,—yes, he would repeat, an immense majority,
if you throw away those who had a corrupt interest
in opposing it,7-they rejected in a hasty, ungene-
rous manner, without even going into Committee.
No more than six county Members voted in the mi-
nority of the Commons. Never was there known
such unanimity. All who had constituents, the
Members for counties and great towns, supported
Reform, and yet that measure was rejected.—
(Shame, shame.) But he hoped that unless they
,ps—(
were obstinately, stupidly blind they would not a
second time commit the same error. As to the
Bishops—(Loud
Loud groans)—he regretted the extraor-
dinarymistake into which they had fallen. They
could see the sky before ahem, yet they could
not read the signs of the times in it. But the people
would teach them the force of public opinion. Know-
ledge was spreading
.with irresistible influence, and
directing men to distinguish between right and
wrong, patriotism and self-interest, and was throw-
ing its shield of protection over liberty and life.
It was necessary to uphold the Government. The
nation was a vast special constabulary—(Loud
cheers)—ready to preserve peace, and secure from
outrage even those who differ from us in opinion.
Before he concluded, this declaration he would
make—that the people had as distinct a right to a
full, free, and real representation, as the Lords to
their distinct branch of legislature, or the King to
his throne. He did not mean a visionary idea of
abstract right, but a political practical right, which
gave the Peerage to the Lords, and his throne to
the Monarch. Were they represented ?—(Shouts
of " No, no.") Were not seats sold like merchan-
dise ? The other night the House formally resolved
it was a high breach of privilege if Peers interfered
in elections; and they passed another grave resolu-
tion, that it was a misdemeanour to controul the free
choice of electors. At that moment seats were ob-
jects of notorious traffic. Could the respect of the
people be expected during such a farce ? Let them
purify themselves from this disgrace of corruption
anti violation of rights. He did not talk of abstract
rights of universal suffrage, which never were main-
tained, and never could be maintained in any country,
but tights which were due to Englishmen—the free
choice of representatives unfettered by corruption.
They wanted to remove what Mr. Burke called the
shameful parts of the Constitution. They must
use the knife. The present was an Administration
which would not spare it. No bit-by-bit operation;
no, a cut deep, sharp, and clear was necessary, and
until then E-rigland could not maintain her moral
rank amongst nations.—( Great cheering.)
Sir T. B. LENNARD returned thanks.
Mr. DISNEY read the resolutions and the address
to his Majesty founded on them, which were re-
ceived with great applause.
The resolutions declared that the rejection of
Reform had shaken the whole fabric of society, ex-
pressed a confident hope that Ministers would

the Ministry : all he wanted was pure representa-
tion, which would give every Reform—financial
Reform and reduction of taxation.—(Loud cheers.)
Mr. LENNARD, M.P., said the address in the
.Essex Standard was a great triumph. It showed
the Anti-Reformers were obliged to profess them-
selves friendly to their principles. They came there
to confirm their wavering faith.—(Cheers.) No
more, then, of that stupid cuckoo note of re-action.
If there had been no re-action amongst us, there
had been none in the King, who would never desert
his loyal people. The Peers, that body of silly
fanatics who had the audacity and folly to resist the
King and the people, ought to take warning from
the American war, and learn how dangerous it was
to oppose the wishes of a united nation. Was it
for them to do so who in property or intelligence
were not the majority of even their own order ?
The creations of Bishops were not regulated by their
fitness. They were mushrooms forced to an un-
natural size in the hot-bed of corruption. In the
emphatic and powerful language of Lord Brougham
the Anti-Reformers would have cause to regret
deeply their sins.—(Mr. Lennard here quoted at con-
siderable length the passage of the Sybil from the
Chancellor's speech on Reform.) He (Mr. Lennard)
was not surprised at the favour with which every
mention of the Bishops' names was received. They
had sinned deeply, and stood in a peculiar position,
Amongst the boroughmongers there was no diviaion,
some were for, some against, Reform; but all the
Bishops, with the exception of two, voted against
the people. No one to-day had pointed out the real
cause of ecclesiastical corruption. It arose from no
m ant of learning or talents, but from that gross
system of favouritism, that infamous system of
corruption and patronage, under which wisdom,
virtue, and ability were no recommendations to a
mitre. Party connexion, political partisanship alone
would advance in the Church. Hence it was the
people of England had been compelled to see in
their cathedrals only so many rotten boroughs. Mr.
Lennard sat down amidst loud cheers.
Mr. HANBURY moved the petition to the Lords.
It expressed the poignant grief of the meeting at
the cruel di appointment of his Majesty's gracious
intentions, and the hopes of the nation--pronounced
nomination boroughs an outrage on the Constitu-
tion—lamented to see the Lords arrayed against the
other branches of the Legislature, with a great
and undoubted majority of the people—and be-
sought them to take Reform into their immediate
consideration.
Mr. HARVEY was here loudly called for ; but—
Mr. KNoxcame forward, arid seconded the motion.
Mr. D. W. HARVEY, M.P., presented himself
amid cheers, arid said—Delusions were not confined
to the lower classes. For many years Whigs and
Tories had set, the Dissenter against the Episco-
palian, the Catholic against the Protestant, and the
landlord against the tenant. The people struggled.
while titled and ecclesiastical plunder went on.
What bore them down ? It was, that nothing re-
mained at the bottom of their pockets.—(Cheering.)
The people groaned under an intolerable fiscal op-
pression. It was like a man going into the marshes
—his cheerfulness, his appetite, his spirits, were
lost, though lie could not tell what was the matter
with him. It might not be palatable to some there,

Mr. HARVEY (in great excitement, springing on
the rails of the waggon, and rushing towards Mr.
Wellesley)—Do you mean to say I have broken
my word ? If you do, I say you he.
Mr. WELLESLEY—WeII, Sir, I do say it.
A scene of much confusion arose. Several gen-
tlemen rose to speak, but
The CHAIRMAN declared the proper course wa-;
first to read the address, and then the amendment.
Mr. HARVEY—I mean merely to read the ad-
dress, without moving it as an amendment. I pro-
mised to do so, in order to avoid dissension. Mr.
Harvey then read his address, and said, " This is
the address. I promised not to move it, and there-
fore shall not."
It was then put by the CHAIRMAN, that the reso-
lutions, petitions, and the address, do pass.
Passed unanimously. The address to be presented
by the Chairman and the county Members; the pe-
tition to the Lords, by Lords Essex and Peire; that
to the Commons, by the county Members.
Mr. WELLESLEY came forward, and was received
with some symptoms of disapprobation. He said—
I have but a few words to say. If you have so
little regard to the high station in which you have
placed me, you will dishonour not me but your-
selves. I said Mr. Harvey broke his word, and I
appeal to Mr. Lennard, Mr. Disney, and my Hon.
Colleague. In a private room, Mr. Harvey produced
his address. I said this is a State paper. I must
consider it; and had it been brought forward, I
would have opposed it. Did he not promise to
make no use of that document ? and am I not justi-
fied in saying he has broken his word ? If to any
man, however mean in rank, I had used unjustifiable
language, I would not hesitate to ask his pardon. But
for that which Mr. Harvey employed (I won't sully
my lips by repeating it), I expect an apology as public
as the insult. If it be denied, I know what course
I will pursue.
Mr. HARVEY—Sir, you will net over-crow me.
There is no apology necessary where no offence was
meant. Mr. Western has been appealed to, but he
was not present in the private room.
Mr. WELLESLEY—Oh ! there you are quite cor-
rect.

Mr. HARVEY—I wrote from Hastings to Mr.
Western that I was preparing an address to Lord
Grey. In the private room I showed this, but not
for criticism. Mr. Wellesley spoke of it exactly as
he stated here just now. Nothing was determined.
The address was to be examined afterwards. Mr.
Disney disapproved of it, so I did, subsequently
pledge myself to Mr. Western not to propose it to
the meeting. If Mr. Wellesley attributes a false•
hood to me because I have read the address, without
using it in any mariner, I will not retract what I
have said. However, if Mr. Western thinks I ought
to apologlze—
Mr. Harvey was interrupted by loud cries for
Mr. Western. That gentleman accordingly mounted
one of the waggons, and said—As I have been ap-
pealed to, I will state every thing
.within my know-
ledge. A misapprehension has an
in arisen on the part of
my Hon. Colleague. On the subject of this meet-
ing I was a whole month conference with Mr.
Harvey. In proposing resolutions and petitions, I
wus anxious to give and take so as to suit all per-
sons, and sent to Mr. Harvey such resolutions as
would be likely to produce union. Mr. Harvey
wrote to me from Hastings that he meant to propose