The Sun.
London, England, 1831-08-10 00:00:00

rSo. 12,141

LONDON, WEDNESDAY EVENING, AUGIIiST:IO,'IB3I.

PRIOR :7D.

FROM THE GAZETTE OF LAST NIGH

IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT.

ments the were conveyed to sonie Hon. Members of dial
House.

THE CORONATION OF THEIR MAJESTIES.
Earl Marshal's Office, Whitehall-yard, August 8, 1831.
The Peers, Peeresses, and Dowager Peeresses, who propose to
attend the solemnity of the Coronation, are requested forthwith
to transmit their respective names and addresses to Sir George
Nayler, Garter, at this Office, in order that their letters of sum-
mons may be forwarded without delay.__ '

HOUSE OF COMMONS, Auausr 9.

Mr. O'CONNELL said that he was prepared to prove
every syllable, and more than every word be had uttered
at the Bar. Colonel Rochford had not stated in his letter,
which had appeared in print, that the reeort was libellous ;
he bad only said no such toast hail been given While he
was in the chair, and nobody alleged it had. He (Jr.
O'Connell* was ready to prove at the bar of the
House that, on the very occasion alluded to, these
four toasts were given:—First, " Captain Graham and
the brave Yeomanry of Newtownharry."—Secondly, " Onr
heels on the necks of the Papists in cold blood."—(Hear.)
Thirdly;Zine Pope in the pillory of hell, and the devil
pelting hiufwith Priests."--(immense laughter.) Fourthly,
" King William the Third, who delivered us from the
fangs of the Papists," Arc. Sic. This, he said, he had
from suckeredible and very good authority, and'also from
parties arise had, voluntarily . tendered , themselves to
appear at the bar and sup'pet the truth of it,' that he
could not for a moment believe it was false. Further,
three or four Magistrates of the county of Carlow were in
the room art the time, and the person alluded to. (We sup-
pose CaOilin Graham) desired the' doors to he opened,
hint all tCe people in` the Mouse 'Might hear. When an
Hon. Member thnught proper to rise up 'and contradict
these facts, what would the House thiirk .of the authority
of one capable of swearing,-Lactually swearing that he be-
lieved Roman Catholic Priests could turn persons into'
hares and goats ?—(lmmense laughter.)
Captain GORDON deeded that he had ever sworn
any such thing. He had said that there were those
who believed Catholic Priests were capable of turning
people into hares and goats, but be had never sworn that
he believed it. He had received two letters 'stating that
no sentiment bad been uttered to the effect alluded to.
Mr. BLAKENEY bad no doubt that the toasts alluded
to had been given.
The SPEAKER then rose to put the question, that an
humble address be presented to his Majesty, when
Mr. STANLEY (who had just entered the House)
apologised for his absence on the score of the severity of
the duties of his office, which occupied him from nine
o'clock until four. Adverting to the toasts which it had
beerrlaid bad been drunk at Callow, he said that Govern-
ment had thought it their duty to institu'e an inquiry into
the subject. It appeared that no toasts of the kind had
been drunk during the presence of the foreman of the
Grand Jury, whose vindication, therefore, was complete.
He must also observe, that the dinner was at a late hour,
and that Grand Jurors were like other men, when ex-
hausted with fatigue. No one could condemn strong ex-
ressions more than he did. But with respect to the toasts
to question, which were certainly as repugnant to good
sense as to humanity, it was distinctly d.nied that they
were proposed by any of the Grand Jurors They were
proposed by some of tke guests at the table; and although
they were drunk by some of the Grand Jurors, the ma-
jority refused to drink them; and the next morning the
whole pa, ty were ashamed of what bad occurred.
Mr. BLAKENEY said, /that the Governor of the
County was one of the priricipal actors in the scene.
Mr. SHEIL observed that it was evident there was some
foundation for the charge respecting what had taken place'
at Carlow, notwithstanding the denial of the Hon. Member
for Dundalk, that the toasts in question had been drunk-.
—(Captain Gorden—Not by the Grand Jury.) They
were drunk in the Grand Jury .room. If not by the
Grand Jury, they had been drunk by their competitors;
although.
•appeared, by the statement of the Right Hon.
Gentlemari; Celt when the mists of intoxication disap.
peered, the whole party were ashamed of their conduct,
and that their blushes mingled with those of the morning.
After a few words from Sir 114 PEEL and Lord Tee-
LAMORE, which were not audible in the gallery,
Captain GORDON observed that an attempt had been
made to cast an imputation upon him by allusion to his
published evidence. Now the fact was, he never did swear
that the Irish priests could turn their parishioners into
hares or- goats. 'What he had sworn was, that such was
the prevailing belief.
The motion was then agreed to. •
FOREIGN AFFAIRS.
Mr. SPEAKER called on Sir Richard Vyvyan, where.
upon__
Lord PALMERSTON rose and said, that, troller the
peculiar circumstances at the present moment, he would'
submit to his Hon. Friend if it might not be better for
him to defer his motion to a future day. He begged of
him to consider the peculiar and critical state of affair:}
to which he (Sir R. Vyvyan) would have to refer. The
King of the Netherlands had, without any previous notice
to the five Powers, commenced hostilities. Immediately
upon receipt of the intelligence, a communication was
sent to his Majesty, but as yet no answer had been re-
ceived. Thus he would be placed in a critical position,
e
communication to the King of the Netherlands, negocia-
Atais h
onndaeimifd inedg
bgntoonetioartteair:l;s really know whether, in consequence of thcommunicationand peace be re established.
should, as as be could not but entertain
hopes they would, recommence, the five Powers would
naturally act as mediators, and umkr these circumstances
course of proceeding in thesenegociations that he
chat
emt putti oitutoseithe Hon. Baronet, whir it would be a con-
venient
(Lord Palmerston), the organ of one of these Power.; in
should epter into a discui.iorr as to which
party was right or which wrong ? He was convinced his
lion. Friend would see that it could not fail to be attended
with inconveniences to the public service, which he was
sure tire Hon. Baronet would be as anxious to prevent as
himself. In conclusion, upon the general grounds of in-
convenience to the public service in the first instance, and
secondly, because hostilities having commenced without
notice, and no answer having been received to the commu-
nication subsequently made, he, as the organ of the five
submitted
mo-
tion.
th o
Powers in that House, would be placed under diNceitiee
that ought no
titeheimpProTr4ietur postponing him.
He
e
to- the Noble lo
an. He disclaimed being actuated in this appeal to his
,ttrod
Hon. Friend by any personal feelings. He spoke simply
upon public grounds, which he was convinced would tie
regarded by his Hon. Friend as lunch as they possibly could
be by himself
Sir R. YYVYAN admitted that, in declaring a com-
munication he had made to the King of the Netherlands,
and no answer yet received, his Noble Friend had given
wsuhffic
ichienhte
(Sir R.
for.
l.rynhaise
od4siadre tog hfr,aliv h
notice,
otiere
postponed.otion,of
In consenting to this PNtP.PnemPilt, hPyrevfry he begged
his Noble Friend to understand it could only be for a shot t
time; fur 'could trot conceal that he was well convinced
the King of the Netherlands had been most unfairly used.
It was not his intention to enter into the discussion res-
pecting.the conferences. He had, however, strong reasons
for what he said. Hitherto the King of the Nettie-lands
be,tn fiorriwhtheetrheeruh•oeuld I e an opportunity of
had not • been defended in that o4se, though' he ha been
frentlently attacked, and most groisly. calumniated. Now
sing whether he was the tyrant some ptople would re.
was an enhghtened
vereign to do all he possibly co-0d 'fOr the benefit
of his People. in consequentofappeal
the made by his
Noble Priettii, and considering that
a communication
would be immediately made by the King of the Nether.
lauds in answer to the application alluded to by the Noble
presenthe'as
anxioushi happyto
Lord, he would Postpone his motion till Thursday.
Lord STORMONT asked the IYoblt., Lord (4-lalifferaton)
Difuitnkw!'irk,"and isrpen-fl'y'd;tlectilla.4ll.edtliN6-aPr r?e•rioh Governmentp
upon the thhaed
.r Dutcheceivevde s
oiffin
et
io,arft?yo.:
badLolalird P"AeLmIVI32I:RPSTu
no
ial
!nation upon the subject.
BqLDER-A asked, If, in the negotiations be-
's atitultrie' 4 'an the GoVernment of France, for
plicieg.P.rince LeOpold on the throne of Belgium, both
Powers had overlooked the probability or the possibility
of the Dutch commencing hostilities ee. • R)
and secondly, he doeired . • ,PSUAIn ;
to flev, whether, in the event of
those bt.)!Widloi beiY- d h
tact King L
P _g commeno , ow they proposed to
e°Pold, and expel tie Dutch by force from
Captain BOLDER()
the Belgian territory?
tweCeanpttahiin_.
Lord MILTON rose to order.
Captain for cc aoswer contend-
.
doing bk—the important nature of
noto to
to ascn--
ing be was iustiAe4 in
Lord MILTON intr t 1
sty's Pries
ought not Q. c' dire to be-
comeeat
hk
of
fdije:yir:
steps
:71 Ile
pc,;D Ts
00
uhbnie: Friend
sw r.
pa'
rTt 1,7; HiriosuAvela j
st
asked
itubtiheecrise
in wasbrparzoipi efrorsepceursriotyn
sided to hie IVialest
rope! gp
cure it

The gallery was not °Pined until about Half-past Four
o'clock, the House having previously been occupied in bal-
lotting for a, Committee upon the Jedburgh'election;X The
Committee having been chosen were sworn in. .
Mr. HUNT, in rising to present a petition ii:om the
Working classes of Manchester, said it was very necessary
for him to be cautious in piesenting Bitch petitions, seeing
how fastidious and squeam►sh some Members -of the House
were respecting the language in which they were couched.
When taxes were being imposed upon the people the
ease was very different. These petitioners described them-
selves as enduring great privations in consequence, as they
believed, of the heavy taxes on corn, and they played for
a repeal of all laws imposing a duty upon th,t article.
Upon the motion that the petition be printed,
Mr. JOHN WOOD took the opportunity of asking
the Hon. Member (Mr. Portman) opposite what he in-
tended doing with his Bill respecting highways.
Mr. PORTMAN said that was a subject involving the
deepest interests of the whole country,, and required the
fullest consideration.—(Hear.) There were many evils
in the highway system that requiied to be cured, but he
should not he justified in attempting to effect that cure with,
out haiing the sanction of Government; he hoped, however,
that if he drew up some plan and introduced it this ses-
sion, that his Msjesty's Ministers would, between this and
the n. xt session, examine it, and introduce some measure to
consolidate the whole of the highway laws. One great
evil was the jobbing system of stopping up public footpaths
near highways(Loud cries of hear)—and another was
the very inefficient controul over the funds of highway
trusts—(Hear)—for it was at present competent for any
road surveyor to go to his favourite magistrates and get
his accounts passed..
Mr. LAMB and Mr. BRISCOE both addressed the House,
concurring in the necessity of an alteration in the present
highway system.
The petition presented by Mr. HUNT was then ordered
I to be printed.
Mr. HUNT then presented a petition from the working
classes of W. stminster, calling themselves the Westminster
Union, held at the Infants' Schoul-roots, in Vincent.:
square, praying for a repeal of the Corn Laws, and con-
cluding with, as Mr. Hunt termed it, a very offensive co,
of " Bleed, bread, bread."
By the desire of the SPEAKER the petition was read
at length by the Cle► k ; it stated that the petitiopers com-
plained of the worst of all national cruses, commonly
called the Corn Laws, which were unnatural and despotic.
It stated that those assertions were fully borne out by re-
cent instances in England and Ireland, and concluded with.
the heart-stirring cry of " Bread•! bread ! bread !"
Lord ALTHORP said he observed the words,
" despotic misrule" were introdueed in the petition,
and he put it to the Hon. Member, and to the House, if
that language was not too violent to be used in addressing
the House.—(Hear.)
Mr. HUNT agreed that it was strong language,:but still
it was true: When men were starving, and saw their
families also starving for want of bread, the Noble Lord
could net expect them to speak in very courteous language.
Mr. HUME put it to the Hon. Member for Preston,
if this was not more likeridiculing the right of petitioning
to use such language to the House.—( Hear.) The object
of the petitioners would be better attained by addressing
the. House respectfully, and he submitted that the petition
be withdrawn, and one presented conveying t 6 wishes of
the petitioners in more proper terms, otherwise it would
plats✓ the House in the painful situation Or rejecting the
petition.— (Hear.) •
Mr. O'CONNELL hoped the petition would be with-
drawn ; the petitioners ought not to make experiments
with a view of ascertaining how far they could go in using
harsh and irritating language.---(Hear.) The petition
contained phrases that ought not to be used either in or
out of the House.
Mr. HUNT would not persevere in pressing the peti-
tion, as the opinion of the House was against him ; but
he begged to state he had used the same sort of language
out of the House. The Corn Laws had not been passed
by the representatives of the people, but by nominees, and
he was perfectly justified in saying those laws were ty-
ranical, for they were passed at the point of the bayonet.
The petition was then withdrawn.
Mr. O'CONNELL said he regretted much the
absence of the Right Honourable Secretary for
Ireland, as he wished to propose to him certain
questions relative to the general administration of justice,
and particiilarly in relation to the late trials in Kilkenny,
&c. and to move for copies of the report and records of
conviction on the 19th of December last. At Maghara,
200 Orangemen, with fifes and bugles, after ransacking
the little town, entered some of the houses, spoliated pro-
perty, destroyed furniture, and insulted females a►►d
children; and upon two occasions,when trials were instituted,
the Catholics only were convicted, and sentenced to three,
four, and five months' imprisonment, while there was total
impunity given to the other party.
Mr. CRAMPTON (the Solicitor-General for Ireland)
complained that notice had not been given by the Hon.
and Learned Member of his inteution to propose such
questions to the Right Hon. Secretary for Ireland. The
House might feel assured that no one was more willing
than that Right Honourable Gentleman to answer any
questions that might be put to him in his place.
He (Mr. Crampton) had authority to state, that on due
notice being given, that Right Hon. Gentleman would,
even at much personal sacrifice, attend in his place, for
the purpose of answering these questions. As to the
statement of the Hon. and Leirned Gentleman, it was re-
markable that the verdicts of several Juries were opposed to
it. He was therefore persuaded that the individual who had
furnished the facts, had formed his estimate upon a par-
tial view of the case, and had greatly exaggerated
the circumstances. Reliance ought certainly to Ile placed

GEO. NAYLER, Garter,

•
St. James's Palace, August 3.
The King was this day pleased to confer the honour of Knight
hood upon Lieutenant-Colonel the Hon. Edward Cost, M.P.
Military Knight Commander of the Royal Hanoverian Guelphic-
Order, and one of the Equerries to his Majesty King Leopold.

Whitehall, August S. - '
The King has been pleased to direct letters patent to be passed
under the Great Seal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain
and Ireland, granting to Rear-Admiral Sir Jahleel Brenton,
K.C.8., the office tr place of Lieutenant-Governor of Green.
with Hospital, in the room of Capt. W. Browell, deceased.

Whitehall, August 6.
The Right Honourable Viscount Melbourne has appointed—
The Right Hon. Lord G. C. H. Somerset ; R. Gordon, Esq. ;
the Right Hon. Lord Ashley ,• the Right Hon. Sir G. H. Rose;
the Right Hon. C. W. W. Wynn ; the Hon. F. G. Calthorpe ;
F. Baring, Esq. ; G. Byng, Esq. ; C. Ross, Esq. ;• Sir G. F.
Hampson, Bart. ; the Hon. B. Bouverie ; Sir T. Freemantle,
Bart. • Colonel J. Clitherow ; S. Perceval, Esq. ; J. E. Dowdes-
well, hsq. ; V. Smith, Esq. ; the Rev. Dr. G. Shepherd ; the Rev,
A. M. Campbell ; Dr. 'l'. Turner; Dr. J. Bright; Dr. H. IT.
Southey; In-. J. ft. Hume; and Dr. E. J. Seymour to be Com-
missioners for licensing and visiting all houses, within the cities
of London and Westminster, and within seven miles thereof,
and within the county of Middlesex, for the reception of lunatics

War Qince, Aug. 9.
2d Regiment of Life Guafds.—Lieut. J. Kinlock tobe Captain,
by purchase, vice Atkinson, who retires, Aug. 9 ; Cornet and
Sub-Lieutenant Sir J. A. Cathcart, Bart. to be Lieutenant, by
purchase, vice Sir J. Ogilvy, Bart. who retires, Aug. 8; Cornet
and Sub-Lieutenant T. Gardnor to be Lieutenant, by purchase,
vice Kinlock, Aug. 9; S. Marindin, Gent, to be Cornet and Sub_
Lieutenant, by purchase, vice Sir J. A. Cathcart, Aug. 8; G.
Wood, Gent. to be Cornet and Sub-Lieutenant, by purchase, vice
Gardnor, Aug. 9.
4th Regiment of Light Dragoons—G. J. Huband, Gent., to be
Cornet, by purchase, vice Blake, promoted, August 9.
4th Regiment of Foot—Lieut. J. Court, from the half-pay of
the 20th Light Dragoons, to be Lieutenant, vice C. Burnley,
whose appointment has been cancelled, August 9.
sth Foot—Captain C. May, from half.pay unattached, to be
Captain, vice J. Macdonal/41, who exchanges, receiving the dif-
ference, August 9.
24th Foot—Ensign M. M. Cook, from the half.pay of the 44th
Regiment, to be Ensign, vice F. Angerstein, who exchanges,
August 9.
30th Foot—Brevet Lieut.-Col. E. A. Angelo, from the half.
pay of the Newfoundland Fencibles, to be Captain, vice C. W.
Barrow, who exchanges, August 9.
35th Foot—Assistant-Surgeon D. M. Macgibbon, M.D. to be
Surgeon, vice Tonnere, deceased, August 9.
51st Foot—Lieut. W. Gordon to be Captain, by purchase, vice
Elliott, promoted • Ensign C. A. Arney to be Lieutenant, by
purchase, vice Gordon ; W. H. Hare, Gent., to be Ensign, by
purchase, vice Arney, August 9.
58th Foot—Assistant-Surgeon J. Huggins, from the half-pay
ofthe 92d Foot, to be Assistant-Surgeon, vice Wilson, appointed
to the 92d Foot, August 9.

59th Foot—Lieut. T. Prior, froik the half-pay of the 18th
Light Dragoons, to be Lieutenant, vice K Macgregor, who ex-
changes, Aug. 9.

60th. Foot—Capt. C. Johnson, from half-pay Unattached, to be
Captain, vice Hon. F. Petre, who exchanges, receiving the dif-
ference, Aug. 9.
64th Foot—Capt. J. Warren, from the half-pay of the 7th
Foot, to be Captain, vice W. Jul% who exchanges, receiving the
difference, Aug. 9.
68th Foot—Lieutenant P. Durnford to be Captain, by purchase,
vice Jackson, who retires ; Ensign W. F. V. Graham, to be
Lieutenant, by purchase, vice Durnford ; A. E. Hill, Gent. to be
Ensign by purchase, vice Graham, Aug.. 9.
74th Foot—Ensign H. Grant to be Lieutenant by purchase,
vice Lord Portarlington, promoted ; P. W. L. Hawker, Gent. to
be Ensign, by purchase, vice Grant, August 9.
90th Foot—Staff-Surgeon J. Robertson, M.D. to be Surgeon,
vice J. M'Arthur, who retires upon half-pay, August 9.
9.;th Foot—Gentleman Cadet J. G. Champion, from the Royal
Military College, to be Ensign, without purchase, vice Simpson,
deceased, Aug. 2.

96th FOot—Zaptain M. Sherer, from half-pay Unattached, to
be Captain, vice W. Ouseley, who exchanges, receiving the
difference; Lieut. R. Mackenzie, from half-pay Unattached, to
be Lieutenant, vice P. S. Nugent, who exchanges, receiving the
difference, Aug. 9.
Ist West India Regiment—Captain D. Keogh, from the half-
pay Unattached, to be Captain, vice Story, who retires, Aug. 9.
BREVET.—Major H. Webster, on the half-pay Unattached,
to be Lieutenant-Colonel in the Army, August 9.
UNATTACHED.—To be Captain, by purchase—Lieut. John
Earl of Portarlington, from the 74th Foot, August 9.

Commission by the Lord Lieutenant of the County of Radnor.
L. Evelyn, Esq: to be Deputy Lieutenant, June 30.
Commission by the Lord Lieutenant of the County of Perth.
Lord Abercrombie to be Deputy Lieutenant, July 27.
Commissions by the Lord Lieutenant of the County Palatine of
Chester.

W. T. Egerton, Esq.. and W. W. Congreve, Esq. to be Deputy
Lieutenants, Aug. 1.

Commissions by the Lord Lieutenant of the County of Oxford.
Ist Regiment of Oxfordshire Yeomanry Cavalry.
R. W. Viscount Chetwynd, July 29; and J. Sirman, Gedt. to
be Lieutenants, July 341

Commissions by the Lord Lieutenant and High Steward of the
Stewartry of Kirkcudbright.
The Hon. M. Stewart to be Deputy Lieutenant; J. Dunlop,
Esq. to be ditto; J. Craik, jun. Esq. to be ditto, Feb. 24.
Kirkcudbright and Wigton Regiment of Militia.
W. Laurie, Gent. to be Ensign, vice R. Gordon ; J. Deniston,
Gent. to be ditto, vice W. Thorp, April 18.
Independent Kirkcudbright Troop of Yeomanry Cavalry.
W. Maxwell, Esq. to be Captain ; W. B. J. Gordon, Gent, to
be Lieutenant; J. Lamont, Gent. to be Cornet, July 23.
Commission by the Lord Lieutenant of the County of Nottingham.
Newark Troop of Sherwood Rangers.
G. Hutton, Gent. to be Cornet, July 28.
Commission by the Lord Lieutenant of the County of
Southampton.
South Troop of the Valley of the Avon Yeomanry Cavalry.
V. Dent, Gent, to be Cornet, July 30.
Commissions by the Lord Lieutenant of the County of Somerset.
West Somerset Regiment of Yeomanry Cavalry.
M. C. Maher Esq. to be Adjutant and Captain by Brevet;
W. Trevor, Gent. to be Assistant Surgeon, July 25.

DECLARATIONS OF INSOLVENCY.
JOHN MORGAN THOMAS, High-street, Shadwell, grocer.
ALEXANDER FLETCHER and JOHN YOUNG, Mill.
hook, Hampshire, iron-founders.
BANKRUPTCIES SUPERSEDED.
GEORGE JACKSON, jun., Bishopsgate-street Without,
surgeon.
SAMUEL CROWTHER, Bradford, Yorkshire, worsted.
spinner.

BANKRUPTS.
JAMES GILBERT, St. Luke's, iron-founder, to surrender
August 16, at one, 26, and September 20, at two, at the Court of
Commissioners. Jenkins and Abbot, New Inn.
JOHN JAMES and ADAM CLARKE, Market Kasen, Lin,
colnshire, drapers, August 12, at two, 30, and September 20, at
eleven,_ at the Court of Commissioners. Ashurst, Newgate.street.
WILLIAM MARTIN, Newgate.street, wine and brandy_
merchant, August 19, at eleven, 26, at nine, and September 20,
at ten, at the Court of Commissioners. Bolton, Austin-friars,
A LEX ANDER CLARK; Broad-street, Rateliff, miller, Au-
gust 16, at eleven, 19, at twelve, and Sept. 20, at one, at the
Court of Commissioners. Cottle,' FurnivaPsann,
SAMUEL. CROSS, jun., Lambeth, timber-merchant, August
16, 26, and Sept. 20, -at eleven, at the Court of Commissioners.
Bailey, Berners.street, Oxford-street.
JONATHAN MATTHEWS, Bristol, basket.maker, August
22, 23i and Sept. 20, at one, at the Commercial Rooms, Bristol,
Wigglesworthandßidsdale,Gray's,lnn-square; Callender,Bristol.
ALEXANDER SYMONS, Falmouth, Cornwall, 'wine-mer-
chant, August 19, 26, and Sept. 20, at eleven, at Pearce's Royal
Hotel, Falmouth.. Michael, Red Lion-square; Bull, Falmouth.
ADAM FLETCHER, Bolton-le-Moors, Lancashire, glass-
seller, Sept. 6, at live 7, and 20? at nine, at the Bridge Inn,
Bolton-le-Moors. Johnson and Weatherall, Temple; Pendle-
bury, Bolton.
JOHNI HA LSTEAD, jun, Colne, Lancashire, cotton-spinner,
August 22, 23, and Sept. 20, at ten, at the York Hotel, Man-
chester. Makinson and Sanders, Temple; Atkinson and Birch,
Manchester.

upon the verdicts of Juries awl the conduct of Judges,

If an Hon. and Learned Gentleman had received
statements from third persons who might be but
partially informed, implicit reliance should n be placed
on their statements to the discredit of the verdict of a Jury,
and the administration of law by the Irish .judges;
Mr. O'CONNELL denied that:he had taken the House by
surl'rise in mentioning this subject ; and as to the respec-
tability of his information, he would only say that a Noble-
man of high rank, well acqnainted with the circumstances,
was his source of information, and he himself had seen
the trials. The only other pircum.tance he would men-
tion wa., that the Crown Solicitor had declared in open
Court that he had received instructions to challenge all
Catholics.

JAMES HAMILTON, Bristol, innkeeper, August 22, 213,
and Sept. 20, at one, at the Commercial-rooms, Bristol. Poole,
Greenfield, and Gamlen, Gray's-inn-square; Cornish and Son,
Bristol.

DIVIDENDS,

W. Huskisson, Haggersten, chemist, August 30, at ten, at the
Court of Commissioners-4. Wilson, Borough-road, Surrey, car-
penter, A ugnst 30, at twelve, at the Court of Comthissioners—
W. B. Morgan, James's-place, Gloucestershire, dealer in wool-
-
len-draper, August a., at ten, at the Court pf'Ommissioners
l
J. Stratton,liiteoreplace, Tottenham c ourt.road, veneer-cut-
ter, August 30, at ten, at the Conti of COmrnissioners__R:B.
Cooper, Prince's-street, Lambeth, August 23,- at ten at the Court
of Commissioners-4. *la* apd !T. Wood, DunkinKield, Che.
thire, cotton-spinners Sept. 1, at two, at the Palace-inn, Man.
chester—J. arid J. Fielding, Catterall, Lancashire, 'calico:
printers, Sept. ii, at ten. at the Red Liondrotel, Preston,,-T.
Carter, Oxford, pastry-cook, August 31, at ten, at the house or
R. Bartram, Oxford—W. Owen, Speke, Lancashire, farmer,
August 30, at one, at the Clarendon-roorns, Liverpool_G: Insole and R. Biddle,Cardiff, Glamorganshire, brick makers Au-
gust 31, at one, at the Commercial-rooms, Bristol--J. Livesey,-
Farnworth and Prestolee-mills, Laficashire, August 31, at ten
at the York-hotel, Manchester—D. Jones, Cynwyd, Merioneth-
, Leicesterslire,
shire, victualler, Sept. 1, at three, at the Lion-inn. Bala, Me.
rionethshire—J. Wakefield, Hinekley, Leitlextienrgs:irlie.mgdr.in,
Augustdl, 'at 'eieven; at the Geoige-inn, Hinekley-4 6=l:
Asliborne, I)er4shire, TiLem.er, Sept -1, •at eteveri, aftt;e Green
Man-inn, Ashborne—T. xbyi Loughborough
lace-manufacturer, Sept. 6,-* e even, at the
Loughborough—W. and W. S, Hostetler], BartOo-upon-Humber,
Liver-
Lincolnshire, scriveners, Sept. 9, at 4even, at ttqi waterside.
inn, Barton-upon Humber—J. Halket and T. Hughes.,
pool, timber-merchants, August 31, at one, at the Clarendon:.
rooms, Liverpool—T. Pearson, Herrin ho Yorkshire, miller,
August 31, at eleven, at the College-inn Rotherham, Yorkshire.'
CERTIFICATES, AUGUST 30.
M. Edge, Stockport, Cheshire, shopkedper—J. Nicoll, Liver-
pool, sail-maker..,..F. •W. Hooper, Leamington, Warwickshire,
carver—T. Lewis, parrett-lane, Wandsworth, boarding-school_
master—W: Shearman, Salisbury-square, Fleet-street, printer_
T. Owen, Fore.street, Cripplegate, Xuctibrieer=T. FeNowes, Al.
dersgate-street, broker—J. M. CrOssly, Manchester, upholsterer
—W. Chambers and W. Richardson, Milk-street, merchants_
J. C. Hill, Liverpool, merchant—A. Coles, Great Portland_
street, corichmaker—S.. Churchill, Deddington, Oxfordshire, scri-
vener—J. Owep, Chiswgltitreet, victualler,
PARTNERSHIPS IitIMOLVErt•
.1. and T. biker, 'GriisboroUgh, Yorkshire, grocers—R. T.
Blyth and W. Hardy, Lincoln, land--surieybrd—W.'Ciimbs and
R. Barron, pawnbrokers—W. Atkinson and Co., Chorley, Lan-
cashire...H. Blowe and Swaine; Birmingham, pawnbrokers_
H. islaikmori and E, Swan LovelPs:court, Paternoster-row,
waretiouseinen—- Cutts andrE. IS. Lander, Manchester, manu-
facturers—W. Walker and S. Brook, ion,, Fopton, Yorkshire,
cloth-manufacturers—J. Harms arm Co., Liverpool,' mordant-
makers—W. Wigney and Co.', Brigliton;•barikers (as far as re- '
gards W. Stanford)—W. Thomas and It. W. Wilson, Tunstall,
Staffordshire, blue-manufacturers—H. H. and R. Williamson, ,
Longpiiit, Staitbrdskire, ea.thenware.mannfacturers—B, Clark '
;Ind J. J, Stratford, FarnOdon-Narlieri*blijptier9.

Mr. CRAMPTON would only beg leave in the very
strongest manner to state that no such instructions had
ever been given by the Government of Ireland, since
he hp i the honour to be connected with it, tq the
Crown olicitor.—(Hear, hear.) Their investiga-
tions had beep, in almost every instance, conducted
with the most perfect impartiality, and no distinction Of
either sect or party ' had ever been made in their
administration of justice. No man was more 'atixidus
to administer justice impartially than the 4ttorney- Oenerll
for Ireland, and he was utterly incapable of giving such
instructions.

Mr. LEADER admitted great respect was due to the
statements of the Hon. and Learned Solicitor-General for
Irelead, but if the Jury Laws were not most mate-
rially changed, a stigma would certainly be left 'n on
Juries which could not be wiped away. He was most
anxious that that stigma should beiemoved, it having been
alleged in the Court-house of Kilkenny that the Crown
Solicitor acted under the 'sanction .of Government,
When every Catholic upon being called to the ,Tujbolt ry.
was put by, and: every Protestant rejected
also. That Was a' state Of 'things Which could
not be endured in Ireland,' rendering, as it did,
the property and life of 'every Proiestant proprietor alike
insecure. Itlwas disgraiefUl to the interests of justice,
apd in direct vi6latio4 of the nrdefs ' of any Governirient
that wished to maintain itself a Christian government
in a Christian country.—(Hear, hear.)
Captain GORDON should very much doubt the capa-
bility of any persons to administer justice who Ind been
guilty of that which had been attributed to ihern;" He
should consider it utterly impossible that any Brand Jury
of Ireland, capable of drinking " bur' feet upon
the necks of the Papists," could administeilustice. Imme-
diately on hearing the iepOrt, he wrote to certain pepons
to innuire into the truth of it and, so far fryer; uOng
true, 'he had recelVed letters saying that not Only no such
toast had been drank, but no such expression had
ever been nee4. The tlairtnaehad. since in the public
prints declared' the report to be now and libellous. So
ttlitclil for the fajth thlt wits to he put 41 some of the state-

Lord P & MERSTON answered, that after the reyolt.t
tion Briza, the Casta; Mr. Anstie, had detained a ship
of war at Rio to protect the persons and prorrty 01 his

t'...-0°c.„........„."4' .. ..
, ~,-745 •,.1.• . ,
, 5
/7,l—_
ifirve,ddila‘ , •
At
• :-
1.
: - -.::', .7. 7,--- - • Air
. Ape....../7"/
..,..
;,--,-, tz 44ri ' f*•!: 1.-.4_, • -., - .
9 N 4---=
.
. . i•-•
• , .
3/4,-,
dr(0,,,,-------....„„.... • >4.4 i 3. .. ~. . • t+.lo' '
X....'
-p.a. • , .... %. , •
) - I ......... ,
~ ~",r , • -. ' •, . ''" , .... _ ..,,, .„...AlO-
- i , ~,,t, 74.,,‘ 9
.-;,,,i
,4+ . ..-." ' s S'' L s,'lral /1 t... ' •
i ,
„.,,,,,i , ..... . • 1..--,t....., ; it.,., ,
. e -tr.
. . ,
. . ...t,,,,A, .-.:744.0. - -lu, f; •
,•:40°F... (r 4 .9";'-;• . ' " •
,4i: •• •-.." I,;s • .• • i ,047,..5...."4.044-111) . 'l, • • , % .
/ ' • frd' _,
,- • \I, I <*r r,LI •
kffea it ~ (41 14 0 , , ,'''''' ,Atf, I. AIL .- , •
vp• ira , t• _ ~.-lks,•,
_lt me. c <l7 • 4 41,'""-- 1111=- '`' •4P
. V - erli ,
• ... iiiirm* ~',!!i! _;l''S'l-1.1.!.t,, cnis—fl '. '-' A* 7i 4
Vre '4ll' . 40 ice-^j: iit
kz.,..
.__ --il :a:tiri
. -

) Per Cent

- - - ------- .
--1'411r•:;---'—'"Tcsa---ees..t.4.,..
l- -Va .1...
eluding rteremport, With a population
~..ig Vfi
IVIAi-.. . ,
',eve four Members; while p(Hi•thrlittl), 4:ihtflhn*ltTrt - -
--a and Gosport, with a population of very nearly that I
amount—viz. 57,000, was to have only two Members ?
Lard ALTHORP said, that the point having been fully
argued on a preceding evetaing, it was not necessary ti' cti
into it now. Go.port had no • claim to be edaiite d into
the union, while Portsmouth and Portera were in feet
one continuous town. At least. Ministers tont(' net le.
eliarged with partiality in this in-tanee• i e Phenneth, I„
which they gave four representatives, had most constantly
returned Members in the opposite interest.—(Cheers.)
After a few words from Mr. CROKFR, the question was
- put and carried.
Majesty's subjects, although the vessel had been ordered to Stroud,
Mr. MILLS protested against the combination, as is.
ituither quarter.
of his constituents. H
inrious to the rights and interests
Mr. DIXON asked if that was not the only vessel
lint the
would not object to adding Stroud to Rochester,
the station?
places would
T hnesta nexto
dqpuaersttioonf
sße'Rhse,dtuhl
ea. t
E.
Rochester,
Lord PALMERSTON said another ship of war would aonstituency to be formed out of those two.
town
he deluged by the voters from Chatham, if. thatt,.
)0.11) .
I e soon there; and added generally, that Government
were to he added to the other two, as
.the 1 t I
would at all times take due steps for the protection of its
lemseholders in Chatham amounted to 1,a06; so that the
subjects and their-property in ell parts of the world.
Captain BOLDER() asked if he was to understand the
h
Lord ALTHORP • bad looked into the. elke of those , .
Lard PALMERSTON replied, that if the Hon. Member 'fleet oitistrbeeprßeseillotawtoionold. be practically to dept eve Roches_
Noble Lord declined to answer his questions?
towns very carefully, arid he could not.see howit
itt ' ;es
would put them singly, he would endeavour to reply. •
Possible to make a distinction between Ch tlian-t and .
Captain BOLDERO repeated his questions in as nearly
as may be the same words.
cheater. The former ran into half of the liberty of Ro-
Lord PALMERSTON observed, the Hon. Member
ehester, and the town and liberty becaMe so, intermixed
meant, of cour-e, the five Powers. with Chatham, that it would be extremely inConventent
Captain BOLDERO begged the Noble Lord's pardon.
Gtoedoitvleimdeanth, etthmat
thein effectreply ofto tthheeaßsisielr%t‘i.uomoldofhteh.
lie spoke of the two Powers, England and France.
Lord PALMERSTON, however, would answer for the
and Stroud would have eleven hundred valeta, and Chat-
franchise Rochester, he must remark, that, as Rochester
five Powers, including France and England. The five
ham about twelve hundred, it was aniposeihle that the
Powers. did not overlook the possibility or probability of
former eleven. hundred should be'entirely excluded front. •
the armistice being broken upon the part of the Dutch,eto.ll;!;:sl:
or on that of the Belgians. The second question—which the representation, seeing that they shall have two Members-.
it will be remembered was whether, in the event of hostili-
Lord VILLIERS agreed with the lion. Gentlernia (Mr. ties being commenced, England and France were preltared Mills) that the effect of the Bill taeuld he to ilePtive rin-
forcibly to expel the Dutch from the Belgian territory ?
cheater of its representation.— (Hear.) The' voters cif declined to answer.
Chatham would, in fact, return both Members. ii the
Noble Lord would consider his own decasinns in the
case of Gateshead, he would see that the same argument.. i
verbal or in writing, upon the part of the King his master, •
trle-aprAelwobetagtgievuel
ofto thkenoziogfroomf
the
ehNe
Nether-
-e
on which he refused to throw Gateshead in-to. Newcastle,
applied with much greater force against throwing 'Chat-
Ira' on
rAddis r‘ir.nhleVttißliielArNtlGlthe
country had not made any communication,
to the Noble Lord, or any other Member of the Govern-
ham into Rochester.—.(fiear.)
. .
ment, stating that the King of the Netherlands would find Lord ALTF/ORP rep ated, that it would be exceed-
ingly difficult to. distingu'sh the Loundariee
of Rochester
it his duty to prosecute his claim of justice upon Belgium
and Chatham.' If the influence of the GovernMent ri,l3
great in Chatham, lie should think that a very s•ryng
by force of arms.
reason for not giving it separate represeitutives, her 4
any of
LNMeEthßeiSlaToOdsNiosatt,sthcoeuanctr7hdaitdedooatgent of the
throwing it rather into the same constituency with Stroud and Rochester, whereby undue influent* Might be cotin: .
communication to him, verbal or in writing, or madeto an
teracted,
to suppose the King, his master, intended to march troops
•
tKhiergsolroedmfPltihAeres of the Government, which would lead them
Sir E. SUGDEN was surprised to bear it asserted .that beyond the frontiers of his own country.
REFORM BILL. there could be any difficulty in separating Chatham from
Rochester. The Noble Lord haul never found nee difil-
On the motion that Mr. Speaker leave the Chair,
'dolts in ascertaining the limits of those towns n
hich he
An How. Meat HER presented a petition, signed by 10,000
had resolved to disfranchise.—(Hear, bear.) In such
p
with any other place. He hoped he might be excused for eases, a little ditch or a stream, which a child could ate
persons, praying that Merthyr Tydvil might not be united
over, was quite a sufficient boundary. But now the Noble.
taking that opportunity of bringing the petition forward.
The House resolved itself into a Committee on this Bill. Lord saw great difficulty in separating places that had. al- =
The first question was, that Kingston-upon-Hull and ways been distinct from each other. He had heard charges
Sculcoates should be included in Schedule E. of special pleading made against the opposers of the Noble
Mr. GOULBURN contended that Sculcoates was as well Lord's Bill, but he was sure that argument about the diffi- •
culty of separating those places was no. more-than special
entitled to a-Member as Gateshead, and thought it ought
pleading-.-there was no sense in it. Me thought that the
not to be included in Hull.
Lord MILTON thought there was only a nominal line Noble Lord ought to give the Committee some reason for
the distinction which he made between the difficulty •of
of separation between the two towns; and as there was an
•pwaterbraeet i 0
identity of interest, there was no -reason why they should
.81 evo phd aetrnha
et
ancienti
difficultyn sting
to be rirbecseadsesesotforfodyealinsfir,raaii7sebhpilsseeaFlruo‘t::l
'not he thrown together. . '
Mr. WRANGHAM said, that Sculcoates ought to be
placed 'on tbe sidle footing with Gateiherul.. There were Suited the object of the Noble Lord, there was then no
two Paving Acts for Hull abdScu/Coates, which, remem- difficulty ; be could always thaw. a notional lino aer°33
bering the carte of Sudbury, the Noble Lord' (Althorp) a town, and cut off a portion of its population. Bo:
l erie sgohftsf separation
when
limit consider a sufficient reason why the two towns should the Noble Lord wished to brinz in a plan air en`ranchise-
be separated.
ment; difficulties of separation which .4/ never been known
. •
Lord ALTHORP observed, that "they dealt differently before, were suddenly discovered, and pronounced to be in-
superable. Although the
with the clauses for' enfranchiaement and those for disfran• liberty o 'Rochester did
~
ibieentent, and opposed the giving one Member to Sculcoates.
tainly run into Chat/lama yet the towof of Rochester wascer- in
LOrd MORPETH did not think there was sufficient se- noway to by ngdounded with Chatham,
parateness and tiiitinctness between the two towns to entitle Lord ALTHORP said that the principle upon wh;,
1-i tl
Bill proceeded with respect to disfranch. the
Sculcoatei to I separate Member.
franchisement, was to
' After a, few words from Mr.
_C. Przytara and Mr. take the representation from those boroughs in Which tl
number of voters was so few as to render then! either 'e
-
Wantinitax, the question was put and carried,
cor-
Ontlitt question that Penryn and Falmouth, Cornwall, rapt or subject to nomination, or which - • . '
'were so mean-
stand part of schedule E, .siderable as to be sufficiently represented by one MeniVr.
-Mr. FRESHFIELD rose to bring forward the motion tie denied that he had resorted to special pleading ; bet he
pf which be had given notice; the object of which was thought that term might not in be applied, when ever
to separate Penryn and Falmouth, They were both sort of contrivance Wet tesorted to, to get thia corner OSf.
thriving places, and of late years Penryn had escially one parish and that corner of another inte, a borou.h,
made advances, not merely in trade and shipping, but In which Wcotding to the rule laid down lay the Bill, cot ld
the number of its voters, which bad risen from 50 or 6(1 pot joetly be allowed to return the setae number of Ment-
to nearly 500. He contended that at the present moment bets as formerly.(Hear, boar.) in the case of such ,
Penryn possessed a better- and .a purer constituency than borough, the Committee bed agreed to a strict rule, by .
would be afforded by the "Bill, and that the union of the which they were to he.dooidini,
_Hut. the same rule did
two. towns was likely so be Injurious to 'Penryn in Par- not apply to eaaes of disfrao.ehisement, nor was there any
denier by introducing GOvernment influence into it. . He reason ;bet it abouldberapplied to theee. The object o
moved, " That the borough of Penryn do retain its pii, tlee enfranchising part of the Bill was- to give 211eanbers to
vilege of returning two Members to Parliament, and that important towns, which ht the most just claims to' be
the right of voting should.as present; ,cousist in the pey- represented. , With ret.pect to
,Rochoster, -he admitted
ment of scot and lot, after a ignaocy of certain number of that there would be no diffieulty„ if it were not iatended
days." it was his intention, if this were carried, to to give Chatham a share in the 'representation ; but,
move also that Falmouth be enfranchised to return two Chatham was to baeepreseuted, then it became a matt as
Members to Parliament. great difficulty to sepirc . e.
6at place
Lord ALTHORP observed that the reasons which ap- from filet of ' Rocheeterete the constituency of fl. plied to the admission of the scot and lot voters of Penryu lUr. MILLS believed that the liberty of Rochester on 1
would apply to all the scot and lot voters of the kingdom, ran into one street of Chatham, .
y
The question merely was, whether it was desirable to add Mr. C.. W. WYNN agroca
F i with the Noble Lord, that .
,ilmouth to Penryn, in order to entitle them to return the rule to be observed la oases of enfranchisement Iva, i
two Members ? Ministers had so decided, recollecting quite different frcln that, which ought to be fullewed in
the
population and the contiguity of the places, and know_ cases of disfranehiseroent. In the latter, the view-most
ing that neither, taken separately, from the amount of favoorable to, the town to be disfranchised ought 'to he
inhabitants, would be etttitled, to more than one rem,. taken, ' If they could find in its vicinity a hainlet or vil-
sentative. The Hon. Gentleman bad spoken highly a loge, or, as the Noble Lord Raid; a eorne: of a apart
from
the purity of the electors of fvegerik, -hot he (Lord Al. which an adequate coottitnency mild be p
that
tborp) could remind him of nn occasion when he was a place ought to he thsown into the town to ,opened,!event it from
nominee god the lion. Gentleman an arnt ; on which disfrolichis.egient. . But, instead of that • p ‘•
• rn
. just construction
aircumstaneescamiont not much redounding to the credit of the rule, the Noble Lord hatetheadmitted the most tri-
of 'Penryn..--(Hear,, 'hear.) The union of tv,ke plas;ts fiing.,...the most contem ti t meanest distinctions
.:.
would tend 'to diminish, the • chance qf the twakrr. elle* of against the disfranchised P
eplaces. The smallest stream bad
such circumstances, by giving e new, extended, and im. been Considered 814441,11 t to bear out the • ' lenses
proved conatitoeney.
wi'h the 110 k LOW. He looked ""gin3rY
.
open that part of the
Mr, C. `;',TVW.AttT said there could be no doubt that Bill* nt ftr as concerned Rochester, to be disfra li• • g
Pahnouth, which was to be joined to Penryn, was a wet vAiher then an enfranchising clause.—(Hear,) , deafest
Ism-
important sea•port--that it contained a large, inaelligent, Mr...STANLEY might agree with the Hon. and
and hie , bid) respectable inhabitancy - -nd fro 1 ' Learned ru v-
s o m its retng eateotentatt that the line ought t° hr he drawn more
our most western port 100 poraesain
.4 ,1 . i g a capacious harbour, carefully in diafranchisement than, it enfranchisement, if
and being el important packet station, i
. ,, , . . t was R 9 fully ea, the Nora ?sfete between parishes nearly equal.—(lleir )
titled as any place i c
n tinscountry to be dieecely eepre., But have laid down the ra/e, fixinthe lowest ' •
g
tented in this House; and he Air --, . - \
sen ( • f.atc.tkart), could oral of pepuletion, care ought to be taken thatd• -
.places ta
regret that that representation etionld lie coated at the ex- tinet from the disfranchised borough should nit be .
pence of his cooatitneatai foe although Peuryn, for some made to appear a part of it, so as to give it a na-
' Tears tre now, would be enabled to assert its share in the mist title to the repreaentation, without an_
joint representation of the towns, yet the right of reta,o. constituency. law be did not thank that they
ought to
rag Members would be eventually merged (after the ex- be so nice . • .ID applying
the rule to the enfranchisement of
,
tinctaon of the present scot anti lot vote:o in. Vali/10,4h, a largeartil important town, containing more than ten
which would contain upwarde of fiitCt electoral honsgsa ; thousand inhabitants. By joining Chatham to Rlaester,
whereas the, bo,eongh of 4::*nryu would rehire with only which was justified by tha proximity of the places, the -
40, houses of that denomination. As the Noble Lord identity of their intereess, and the difficulty ofdistiriguiehe
opposi e (Lord Althorn) had nude some remarks on the ing their Emile, 4 sufficient, an independent, and certainly
voters of Peoryni he (Mr. S.) would be doing injustice not an eNteavagantly numerous constituency would be
te Ilia own feelings, were be not to state that, having found. But lion. Gentlemen opposite said that the Go-
contested the borough on two occasions, the last election vernu:ent had great influence in Chathatn, and in the sa
being one of the most severe that had tairen place in breath they said, givta Chatham a Meniber to it•s}f. If
this kingdom, and having at these periods had an op. Government would have an undue influence over the votes
portunity of judgi,gz winutely of the conduct of the in Chattuitia, then that was an additional reason for joining
voterate he itit ' himself justified in stating, that the titrit Ottc% to. Rochester, instead ol giving it -
a separate
electors of Penryn were as pure and incortukt ea the representative.
•
voters in any other open town irk 4i.-, eoteettgy., eaet Sir C. WETHERELL--it he had been aware anat this
had been justly stated by hig kin, colleague, ftereya was case would have keen discussed, should certainly have '
onlngneither a degged ate aOR ming place—ite population, in.. moved that Mr., Bernal should leave the chair, pro hoc
tln pariah; was nearly s,ooo—it contained a vice; ;n 'ereler that the gentleman might *defend his co»-
trumbet. of resident gentry—many respectable profes,ional etiteente of Rochester.—(A laugh.) idowever the Hon.
men, and merchants, carrying on considerable tratle, and. the ' Cho:ttnan would have an opportunjty, after leaving the
generality of the voters were as iotellient emit as well• chair, to make a speech, and he (Sir C. W.) haul no doubt
informed as any class of voter n th.:4lcoOv.stq ; and this that he would also mako a motion on tho subject. It was
led him (Mr. S. ). toi reaaarle, that lie hoped his Majesty's rune of those paiks which. the more he (Sir La W.) studied
51inieters would re'doce the right ofeoting in the towns ofthe it, the ruesse confused it heoatne.--( A laugh.) (The
Wet of keUgland, for he could assure them that the 31. a.pd lion. and Learned Gentleman went into a review of all '
4/, househelders in those districts were of the see-ea rank in the arguments res,pectieg ait-vey, Bridport, and numerous
life, equally intelligent, and as fully eteethaeti, to exercise the other born ;n in the several preceding schedules.) If the
elective franchise as th 7 794 ij,-asoaiers in the North of politioan cranium of the Noble
Cramer of the Bill sluth!
e e
England,
et:et; he aulornitted to the ha-pea:ion of skilful phre-
-4 a LEMON supported the original queraim, awe; uologists, they would Moat indubitably discover., that
his Total knowledge of Falmouth and Peory.t.-„. the organ of destroction waa marvellously protube-
Mr. R. GORDON compleieea ;,hat Ministers, in this rant upon itaea(A laugh.) When his orgenie, syste- • -
instance, as in some othees, hod &parted from their own matic, conatitutional destractiveness—(A laugh)—w-as di.
rule i for,.ae ,Fe,nrye had a population of more than two rected to, annihilate the rights of the pu-ople of •England.
thoneapo, it ought to have been placed in schedule lA. * Ihe really dissevered the united population of the most inf..
had voted against the Ministers whenever 4 1944 them portant towns. But whoa he was desirous to extend the '
abandoning the course they had tlealked out foe them- deinocratie repreeeretation, then his arms warel nenough'
o g
selves.
to unite le,,e •. ea separated by 10, aye even 20 miles.—(A I
Lord AtIVIR.rO°4 the union of Penryn and Pal- leueeh.) After the Noble Lord bad severed towns which '
repufle teew t e same grounds as the union of Sarkeitetea , had always been and were still united for every other pm--
and'beal. Both were contiguous ;and ip ea there was . pose but jut the purposes of that Bill, he united places
not a sufficient population for two, Me ie
'etirs, which they which had always been separate, not to preServe, but to
would obtain by being eaeitej.
, destroy the retwesentation of Rochester. He knew that
Mr. FAVilliikrCD, said,. that. the ineoiey institute!) ! the greatest disgust prevailed in the count yof lareeenpon :
in the tboule. of Lordsbad acquitted Powsyu of the charge , this subject,---( Hear, hear.) There was notLitge in the
imputed. Bili to connect together or to eteder consistent with each
. Mr. CRESSET 41'.4',1.11A1A wakunderstood to aapport other the principles Of It* entianchisirea eind disfranchising
the amendment ; after which the qUestiog true put, and it parts of th,e r4o. Pie agreed wi.;i2 Lodßigh Hon. Sr_
de r had not been
was negatived, and the original stuestion carried. , ct•eteq ioi ire)and, that the W
nt" his principles to dis"fran-
An amendment was 4greed tn,' for including the•parish 4 see-eally nice in the applirsateia
4c.u. When Le watated to get assts -
of Portsea ; rand the question was put, that Pestat4outh chisetnent and to ei.cse.t
and Poi rasa, in the connty. of Southartepaoa, stand part of for democratio .:epresentatiuns, he pail 230 respect to trk,,,
schedule E. -
chartered rights of the •peopig of England.
Mr, CROKER wished to know why Plymouth, in. Mr. HODOES—Au Hon. and Learned Gentle-awl