The Sun.
London, England, 1836-08-03 00:00:00

LONDON, WEDNESDAY EVENING, AUGUST 3, 1836.

THE MARKETS-(THIS DAY).

CORN EXCHANGE.
There are moderate supplies of all kinds of grain this
week, and not much Flour,. The weather is very fine, and
the trade dull for every Miele. Wheat is not lower than
on Monday. Barley, Beans, and Peas, arc unvaried. Oats
find some buyers at Monday's prices. The Flour trade is
very dull at last quotations.

ARRIVALS.
Wheat. Barley. Oats.
English
Irish - 230 5,170
Foreign 1,560

Flour.
2,140 sacks

PARLIAMENTARY DIVISION.

CHURCH OF IRELAND BILL.

(From the Votes and Proceedings of the House of Commons.)
TUESDAY, AUG. '2.
Order for Consideration of Lords Amendments read; Motion made,
and Question proposed, " That the Amendments be taken into
Consideration upon this day six months :"—Amendment proposed
after the word "be " to insert the word "now," and to leave out
the words " upon this day three months :" Question proposed,
" That the word now 'be there inserted :"—Question put :
The House divided:
MI

Agnew; Sir A.
Alford, Lord
Alsagcr, Richard
Arbuthnot, Hon. H.
Arcllall, General
Ashley, Lord
Ashley, Hon. H.
Attwood, M.
Bagot, lion. AV,
Joseph_
Barclay, C.
Baring, F. T.
Baring, H. B.
Baring, T.
Barneby, John
Becket, Sir John
Benet t, John
Bentinek, Lord G.
Bcresford, Sir J.
Bethel, R.
Blackburn, John I.
Blackstone, W. S.
Boldero, Henry
Bonham, Ptancis R.
Borthwiek, Peter
Bradshaw, James
Bramston, T. W.
Brownrigg, S.
Bruce, Lord E.
Bruen, P.
Bruen, Colonel H.
Buller, Sir J. Y.
Burrell, Sir C. M.
Calcraft, J. 11.
Campbell, Sir H.
Canning, Sir S.
Castlereagh. Visct.
Chandos, Marquis of
Chapman, A.
Charlton, E. L.
Chichester, A.
Chisholm, A.
Clive, Visct.
Clive, Robert
rodrington, C. W.
Cole, Hon. A.
Compton, H. C.
Corbett, T. G.
Corry, H. L.
Crewe, Sir G.
Cripps, J.
D'Albiac, Sir C.
Darner, Dawson
Darlington, Earl of
Diok, Q.
Dowdeswell, W. E.
Duffield, T. D.
Dugdale, W. S.
Dunbar, George
Duncombe, A.
East, James Buller
Eastnor, Viscount
Eaton, R.. 1.
Egerton, W. T.
Egerton, Sir P.
Egerton, Lord Fran.
Elley, Sir J.
Elwes, J. P.
Estcourt, T. G. B.
Fancourt, Major
Feilden, W.
Ferguson, G.
Finch, G.
Fleming, J.
Foley, E. T.
Forbes, W.
Forester, Hen. C.
Forster, C.

Peel, Sit R.
Peel, Colonel
Peel, Edmund
Peel, W. Y.
Pelham, J. C.
Pemberton, T.
Penruddeck, J H.
Pereev:li, Colonel
Pigot,
PI u m J. P.
Polhill, Frederick
Pollen, Sir John
Pollington, Viscount
Pollock, Sir F.
Praed, NV. M.
Price, Samuel Grave
Price, Richard
Pringle, A.
Pusey, P..
Rite, Sir W.
Reid, Sir J. It
Richards, John
Richards, R.
Ridded, W.
Itotw, C.
Rushbrooke, Colonel
Russell, C.
Sanderson, R.
.anden, Lord
Scarlet, Hon. R.
Scott, Sir E. D.
Scourtleld, W. H.
Shaw, F.
Sheppard, T
Shirley, J. E.
Sibthorp, Colonel
Smith, A.
Smyth, Sir G. M.
Somerset, Lord E.
Somerset, Lord G.
Spry, S. T.
Stanley, Lord
Stewart, John
Stewart, Sir M. S.
Stormont, Viscount
Sturt, H. C.
Tennent, Emerson
Thomas, Colonel
Thompson, Ald.
Tollemache, A. G.
Trench, Sir Frederick
Trevor, A.
Trevor, Hon. G. it.
Twiss, Horace
Tyrrell, Sir J.
Vere, Sir C. B.
Vernon, G. H.
Vesey, Hon. Thomas
Vivian, John Ennis
Vyvyan, Sir R.
Wall, B.
Walter, .1.
Welhy, G. E.
Weyland, Major IL
Whitmore, 'l'. C.
Williams, It.
Williams, T. P.
Wilmot, Sir Eardley
Wodehouse, Hon. E.
Wood, Colonel T.
Wyndham, W.
Wynn, Sir W. W.
Yorke, E. T.
Young, J.
Young, Sir W. I.
TELLRRS.
Fremantle, Sir T.
Clerk, 6ir G.

Acheson, Viscount
tdam, Admiral Sir C.
Aglionby, H. A.
A Eton, R.
Angerstein, John
Anson, Hon. Colonel
Astley, Sir Jacob
Attwood, T.
Bagshaw, John
Bainbridge, E. T.
Baines,
-IBwin,
B N.
Ba erman, A.
Barclay, David
Baring, F.
Barnard, E. G.
Beauclerk, Major
Bellew, R.
Bellew, Sir P.
Bentinck, Lord W.
Berkeley, F.
Berkeley, C. F.
Bernal, R.
Bowes T.
Biddulph, R. M.
Bish, T.
Blake, M. J.
Blamire, W.
Blunt, Sir C.
Bowes, J.
Bownng, Dr.
Brabazon Sir W.
Brady, Denis C.
Bridgman, Hewitt
Brocklehurst, J.
Brodie, W. I).
Brotherton, J.
Browne, It. D.
Buckingham, J. S.
Buller, C.
Bulwer, H. L.
Bulwer, E. G. E. L.
Burdon, W. W.
Burton, H.
Butler, Hon. P. S.
Buxton, T. F.
Byng, lksorge
Byng, Hon. G.
Callaghan, D.
Campbell, Sir John
Carter, J. B.
Cave, ()Way
Cavendish, Hon. C.
Cavendish' Hon. G.
Chalmers, Patrick
Chichester, J. P. B.
Churchill, Lord C. S
Clay, W.
Clayton, Sir W.
Clements, Lord
Clive, E. B.
Crdrington, Sir E.
Collier, John
Conyngham, Lord A.
Cookes, 'F. H.
Cowper, Hon. W. F.
Crawford, W. S.
Crawford, W.
Crawley, S.
Curteis, E. B.
Dalmeny, Lord
Denison, .1. E.
Den niAnun, Alex.
D'Evncourt, C. T.
Divett, E.
Doukin, Sir R.
Duncombe, T. S.
Dundas, D.
Dunlop, J.
Ebrington, Lord
Elphinstone, H.
Etwall, It.
Euston, Earl of
Evans, G.
Ewart, W.
Fellowes, Hon. N.
Ferguson, Sir R. C.

Pease, Joseph
Pechell, Captain
Pelham, C. A. W.
Philips, G. R.
Philips, Mark
Phillipps, C. M.
Ponsonby, Hon. W.
Ponsonby, J. G. B.
Potter, it.
Poulter, J. S.
' Power James
Price, Sir R. •
Pryme, G.
Pryse, P.
Eltainsbotton, J.
Rice, T. S.
Rippon, C.
Robarts, A W.
Robinson, G. R.
Roche, W.
Roebuck, J. A.
Rolfe, Sir R. M.
Rundle, John
Russell, Lot d John
Russell, Lord
Russell, Lord Charles
Ruthven, R.
Sanford, E. A.
Scholefield, J.
Scrope, G, P.
Scale, Colonel
Seymour, Lord
Simeon, Sir R.
Smith, J. A.
S.nith, R.
Smith, It. Vernon
Smith, B.
Stanley, H. T.
Stewart, P. M.
Strickland, Sir G.
Strutt, E.
Stuart, Lord Dudley
Stuart, Lord James
Stuart, Villiers
Talbot, C. R. M.
Talbot, J. H.
Tancred, H. W.
Thompson, Colonel
Thomson, C. I',
Thornely, T.
Tooke, NV.
Tracey, C.
Troubridge, Sir T.
Tulk, C. A.
Tynte, C. K. K.
Tynte, C. J. K.
Verney, Sir H.
Villiers, C. P.
Vivian, Major C.
Vivian, J. ti.
Wakley, Thomas
Walker, C. A.
Wallace, It.
Warburton. It
Ward, H. G.
Westenra, Hon. J.
Westenra' Hon. R.
Whalley, Sir S.
W grey, I. N.
Wilbranain, G.
Thomas
Wilkins, Walter
Wilks, J.
William', W.
NVilliams, W. A.
Wilson, Henry
Winnington, Sir T.
NVinnington, H. J.
Wood, C.
Wood, Alderman
IWoulfe, Se.rgeint
Wrightson, 'NV. B.
Wyse, T.
Young, G. F.

TELLERS.
Stanley, E. J.
Steuart, It.

FOR
Wortley, Hot
Miles, W.
Wilbraham, R.
Walpole, Lord
Coote, ir C.
Longtield, R.
Ossulston, Lord
Goodricke, F. L. 11.
Kirk, I'.
Patten' Wilson
Irton, S.
Plunkett, Hon R. E
Brudenell, Lord
Bane, H. D.
Stanley, E.
North, F.
Johnstone, Sir .1. V.
O'Neill, J B. B.
limed, J. B.
Ingham, Robert
Knight, H. G.
Martin, a.
Or:ary' Sir W.
Cole, Lord
Cooper, E. J.
Bolling, W.
Ryle J.
Scott, Lord John
E,tcourt, T. S. B.
Verner, Colonel
Hay, WI
Duncombe, W.
Balfour, 'l'.
Greville, Sir C. J.
Powell, J.
Halse, J.
Wynn, bight Hon.C.
Baring, W. B.
Smith, T A.
1 'Jones Wilson
Marsland, T.
Ferguson, Sir R. A.
Sinclair, Sir G.
West, J. B.
Entwistle,John
Hope, Hon J.
Miles, P. J.
Bateson, Sir R.
Chaplin, T.
Owen, 11.
Johnstone, J. J. H.
Hayes, Sir E.
Bruce, C. L. C.
Goulburn, Mr. Serjt.
Herbert, Hon. S.
Follett, Sir W. W.
Davenport, J.
Hcathcote, G. J.
G rant, F. W.
Maxwell, J
Dottin, Abel Rous
Bell, M.
Cartwright, W. R.

). J. S.

AGAINST.
Blackhurne, J.
Anson, Sir G.
Ainsworth, Peter
Andover, Viscount
Barron, H. W.
Barry, G S.
Belfast, Earl of
Berkeley, Granville
Bodkin, John James
IBuller, E.
_ Caylcy, E. S.
Chapman, M. L.
Cami;bell, W. F.
Colborne, N. W. R.
• Crompton, S.
Curteis, H.
Childers, J. W.
Dobbin, Leonard
Dundas,
Dundas, J. C.
Fazakerley, J. N.
Fergus, John
Finn, W. F.
Fitzsimon, N.
Fitzsimon, C.
tort, John
Gillon, W. D.
Grattan, 11.
Grosvenor, Lord R.
Heneage, G. E.
Hodges, T. T.
Jervis, J.
Johnston, A.
Kerry, Earl of
Lee, J. L.
Lister, E. C.
Long, W.
Marshall, W.
MoL!sworth, Sir W.
Mostyn, E.
Musgrave, Sir R.
O'Brien, W. S.
O'Connell, Maurice
O'Connor Don
Oliphant, L.
Paget, F.
Pendarves, E. W.
Roche. D.
Rooper, J. Bonfoy
Scott, J. W.
Sharpe, General
Shell, R. L
Speirs, A.
Talfourd, T. Noon
Thompson, P. R.
Trelawnev. Sir W.
Turner, W.
Walker, R.
Wen 134.,, Capt.
White, .S.
William 4, Sir J.
Williamson, Sir H.
Wrottesley, Sir J.

IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT.

HOUSE OF LORDS, AUGUST 2.

The LOAD CHANCELLOR took 1119 seat on the Woolsack
at Five o'Clock.
MESSAGE FROM THE COMMONS.

The SOLICITOR-GENERAL and other Members of the
House of Commons brought up the Dublin And Drogheda
Railway Bill, and the Courts of Session (Scotland) Bill,
with the amendments as agreed to by the House of Com-
mons.

BRIGHTON RAILWAY.
The Duke of CUMBERLAND wished to ask the
Noble Duke (Richmond) whether he would that evening
bring up the Report of the Committee on the Brighton
Railway ? He was anxious to be present when that Re-
port was brought up.
The Duke of RICHMOND would not make the
Report to-day, nor 'until it. was properly drawn up.
He, certainly did inform the illustrious Duke that in pre-
senting this report, he would call the attention of their
Lordships tothe conduct of the majority of the Committee
in making the report. He would not then go into reasons
and recapitulations which he had gone into this morning—
he would only say that it was absolutely necessary for the
House, before another session, to re-consider those resolu-
tions which, in his opinion, had been construed by the Com-
mittee so as to inflict great injustice on those persons who
came forward as the promoters of railways. He would
make the report, if the illustrious Duke wished it, to-
morrosi, or e‘c Thursday next, if it was more convenient.
The puke of CUMBERLAND . would then say
Thursday.
The Duke of RICHMOND would give notice of his
intention, as it would be convenient to the House to know
it, and to have an explanation of the course .he meant to
pursue—he would make the report on Thursday ; and he
would most decidedly make observations, and-he feared
strong ones, on the conduct of Noble Lords. He did not
mean personal observations, but with respect to the view
which some Noble Lords had taken of their resolutions.
He would not pledge himself to move the recommittal of
the Bill—he wished to reserve this for future consideration.
The Duke of CUMBERLAND was not aware that any
thing had takeji place in the Committee that would call for
the animadversions of the Noble Duke. At the same time
the Noble Duke had a right to make what observations he
thought fit. He hoped when the report was laid on the
table he would be able to prove that the conduct of the
Committee was not so blameable as was supposed.
On the motion of Lord DUNCANNON, the Grand
Juries (Ireland) Bill was read a second time.
FISHERIES' BILL.
On the motion of Lord TEMPLE MORE, the Order
of the Day for the second reading of this Bill was dis-
charged.
POOLE CORPORATION BILL.
Lord STRAFFORD presented a petition from Poole, in
favour of this Bill.
Lord REDESDALE presented a petition from 500 in-
habitants of Poole, against the Bill.
The Duke of RICHMOND moved the second reading
of the Bill. He did not think that there were any grounds
for opposing the Bill, but if any were stated, he would re-
serve to himself the right of replying to them.
Lord REDESD ALE rose to oppose the second reading
of the Bill. He considered that this Bill had been
introduced from party motives, and there was no
ground for it. The matter to which this Bill referred, viz.
the election of the Corporation of Poole, was at pre-
sent undergoing inquiry in a court of law, and that
House ought not to interfere with the question. The
principle of the Bill was most unconstitutional: it
interfered most unjustly with the elective franchise.
The Noble Lord concluded by moving, as an amendment,
that the Bill be read a second time this day six months.
Lord STRAFFORD rose to support the Bill, and re-
ferred at some length to the circumstances attending the
election of the Town Council and Corporation of Poole.
Lord LYNDHURST interrupted the Noble Lord.
He would suggest to the Noble Lord whether they could
proceed without evidence. The allegations of the Bill
must be proved to their satisfaction before he could allow
it to pass. This was always the practice.
The Marquis of LANSDOWNE rose to order.—
(Hear, hear.) His Noble Friend (Lord Strafford) was per-
fect.l,v4w,ified in making the statements he had made.'
Lord LYNDHURS only threw out a suggestion. The
Noble Lord might do as he liked.
The Marquis of LANSDOWNE (e,mphatically)—This
is a most disorderly interruption2—(Hear, hear.)
Lord STRAFFORD then proceeded with his statement.
He concluded by calling upon their Lordships to support
the second reading of this Bill.
Lord LYNDHURST said that he was utterly unac-
quainted with the facts of this case. The preamble of the
Bill stated that the Corporation of Poole had been guilty of
fraudulent and illegal practices at a late election of the
municipal officers of that borough. He thought that it
would be utterly impossible to proceed with this Bill, which,
in fact, amounted to a Bill of disfranchisement without
hearing evidence at the bar. It was the uniform practice in
cases of this description to require the case of fraud or ille-
gal practices to be made out at the bar. He also believed
that a case arising out of this election had been tried at the
late Dorchester Assizes, and that, though a verdict had
been obtained, no judgment had as yet been pronounced.
He remembered in the case of a Member of their Lord-
ships' House, when it was proposed to institute some pro-
ceedings against him, the Lord Chancellor stated that as
notice of a new trial had been given the House could not
proceed upon the verdict. In that case, however, no fur-
ther proceedings were ever taken. He therefore thought,
as evidence as to the fact had not been heard at the bar,
and that as the matter was now pending before a Court of
justice, the present Bill ought not to be proceeded with. He
should, therefore, feel it his duty to oppose it.
Lord STRAFFORD explained.
The Duke of RICHMOND said that he was not aware
that the evidence was not before the House. He wished
it to be brought up ; but in consequence of'what passed in
the presentation of a petition yesterday, he thought it better
to have the Bill read a second time, and then move that it
be referred to a Select Committee up stairs. In the present
state of the House he should not trouble their Lordships
by dividing ; but he should protest against the course they
had pursued on the present occasion.
Lord WHARNCLIFFE said that it would be impos-
sible for the House to proceed without hearing evidence as
to the facts. It certainly was his disposition, and the dis-
position of Noble Lords with whom he acted, to do justice ;
but that, he thought, could not be done without hearing the
evidence.
The Marquis of SALISBURY said that the question
was pending in a Court of Justice, and consequently lie
should protest against this House now proceeding with this
Bill, which would, in fact, amount to an interference with
the proceedings of an inferior Court.
After a few words from Lords HOLLAND, REDESDALE,
and WvziFor.-o, the amendment was agreed to.