The Sun.
London, England, 1836-05-19 00:00:00

DOCKS BILL.

-
Order for further consideration of Report read ; [Prints having
.teen delivered d Motion made and Question, propo;ed,-6, That
;he Amendments be now- read a second time :"—Amendment
woposetl, to leave out from the word " That" to the end of the
Question, in order to add the w:.rds, " the Report be taken
into further consideration upon this day fortnight " instead there-
af—Question put " That the words proposed to be left out stand
part of the Question."—Tae House divided :--
.JORITY—AYES, 168. •
Fax.ikerley, J. N. Manic, Hon. Fox
Fector, John Millet Methuen, I'.
Fergus, John Nlorpeth, Viscount
I erguson, Sir Ronald Morrison, J.
Ferguson, Robert Mosley, Sir O.
Ferguson, (horge Mu-grave, Sir R.
Finch, G. Nagle, it It
Fleetwood. IL North, F.
Forster, C. O'Connell, .1.
Gaskell, J. M. O'Connell, M. J.
Gaskell, i 5. O'Connell, Morgan
Gitlin', W. D. (PLoglilen, M.
Gladstone, 'l' Oliplian.' 1..
Grodburn, Serjcant Packs, C. W.
Greisley, Sir 11. Paget, F.
Grey Sir G. Parker' J.
Grwe, G. Parnell, Sir 11.
Guest, J. Pattison, J.
Pall. B. Pease, Joseph
Handley, H. Pendarves, E. W.
Hantinge, Sir 11. Philips, M.
Hardy, J. Philips, G. R.
Harland, W. C. Plonkett, R.
Hastic, A. Pollen, Sir J. W.
Hawkins, J. H. Potter, R.
Hector, C. Poulter, J. S.
He;miker, Lord Roche, D.
Hindley, Charles Roebuck, J. A.
HUblicuse, Sir J. C. Rundle, J.
Hodges, T. L. Sandon, Lord
..ope, firm. J. Scholetield, J.
Howard, P. H. Scott, Sir E.
Hughes, H. Scropc, 0. P.
Hume, Joseph Sharpe, Ge eral
Humphery, J. St rutt, Edward
Flurst, R. 11. Stuart, Lord James
Jervis, J. Stuart, W. V. I
Johnstone, A. Thompson, Colonel
Kearsley, J. 1-1 Thorneley, Thomas
Knightley, Sir C. 'Peke, William
Labouehere 11. Turner, W.
Lee, John I.ee Vescy, Hon. T.
Lefroy, A. Villiers, Charles P.
Lennox, Lord G. Vivian, J. H.
Lennox, Lord A. Wakley, Thomas
Lincoln, Earl of Walker, R.
Loch, James Wallace, R.
Lowther, Colonel Wagon, Rigby
Lushington 1)r. Wigney, I. N.
Mackenzie, A. S. Wilbraham, G.
Mackinnon, W. A. Williams, W. A.
Maclean, I). Wrottesley. Sir J
M•Leod, M. Young, J
APTaggart, J.
Marjorihanks, S.
Maryland, H

MA
Acite,on, Viscount
Agnew, Sir A.
Ainsworth, Peter
Meager, Richard
A ttwood, 'l'.
B .gs aw John
fi.seph
Billie, H. D.
Baldwin, Dr.
Balfour,
Bannerman, A.
Barclay, David
Barlng, F. T.
Baring,
B iroard, E. G.
Barron, H. W.
Barry, G. S.
Beeke t, Sir J.
Bell, M.
Bellew, It. M.
Bish, T.
filAckburne, J. 1.
W.
Bonham, F. R.
Bowring, Dr.
Brady, 1). C.
Bridgman, Hewitt
Brocklehurst, J.
li-otherton, .1.
Brownrigg, J. S.
Browne, R. D.
Bruc Lord E.
Bruce, C. L. C.
liyng, George
Calcraft, J. H.
Canning, Sir S.
Cavendish, G. H.
Chalmers, P.
Ch.plin, 'r,
Chapman, A.
Chisholm, A. W.
Clements, Lord
Codrington, Sir E.
Colborne, Ridley
Crawford, W. S.
Crawford, W.
D'Albiac, Sir C.
Darlington, Earl of
Denison, J. E.
Dirial, E.
Dunbar, George
Duncombe,
Dundas, J. D.
Ebrington, Viscount
Elley, Sir J.
Ettiw, R'. Hon. E.
Ewart, W,

TF.I.LERS.
Hay, Sir A. E.
Stanley, E. J.

Bethell, H.
Bradshaw, J.
Buller, Sir J. B. Y,
Esicourt. T.
Forbes, W.
Jackson, J. D.

.NORITY—NOES,
Murray, J A.
1 Nichol', J.
Pringle, A.
Pryme, G.
Rae, z•ir William
Rug, C.

Sheppard, T.
Trevor, Hon. A.
Wemyss, Captain

TELLER 4.
Clerk, Sir G.
Campbell, Sir J.

ABERDEEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS BILL.
Order for further consideration of Report read :—Motion made, and
Question put—" That the Bill be re-committed."—The House
divided :

.JORIT Y.—AYES,
Fitzgibbon, Hon. It.
Fitzroy, Lord C.
Folkes, Sir W.
Gaskell, I).
Grattan, J.
Grey, Sir G.
1 Grey, Colonel
Grote,
Guest, J. J.
Hall, B.
Harland, W.
Hastie, A.
Hector, C. J.
Hindley, C.
Hodges, T. L.
Howard, E.
Flume, Joseph
Hutt, %V.
Jervis, .1.
Lefevre, C. S.
Lennox, Lord G.
Lennox, Lord A.
Long, W.
Lushington, Dr.
Lushington, Charles
Lynch, A. 11.
Mackenzie, J. A. S.
M'Leod, it.
M.Taggart, John
Marjorin.inks, S.
Mar W.
Marsland. H.
Maule, Hon. Fox
Morrison, J.
Mostyn, L.
Murray, J. A.
Nagle, Sir It.
North, F.
O'Brien, C.
O'Brien, W. S.
O'Connell, J.
O'COnnell, M. J.
O'Connell, Morgan
O'Ferrall, 11. M.
O'Log:len, Sageant
r Mph ant,
Oswald, J.
Paget, F.
Palmer, General
Parker, 3.
Parnell, Sir H.
Parrott, J.
rattison, James

Acheson, Viscount
Aglionhy, H. A.
Ainsworth, Peter
Attwood, T.
Bagshaw, John
Baring, F. T.
Barnard, E. G.
Barron, H. W.
Bellew, It. 11.
Bowes, T.
Biddulph, R. M.
Bish, T.
Blackburne, J.
Blamire, W.
Blunt, Sir C.
Bownng, Dr.
Brady, Denis C.
Bridgeman, Hewitt
Brocklehurst, J.
Brotherton, J.
Browne, It. D.
13ulwer, ti, L.
Byng, tieorgp
Byng, Hon. G.
Campbell, Sir John
Ciivendish, Hon. (i.
Chalmorg, Patrick
Chapman, X. L.
Chichester, J. P. B.
Clay, W.
Clements, Lord
Cr dringiAin, Sir E
Colborne, N. W. K.
Cowper, Hon. W. F.
Cr.or !Ord, W. S.
Crawford, W.
Dalmcny, Lord
Denison, W. J.
Dillwyn, L. W.
Dina, E.
Donkin, Sir R.
Duticombe, T, S.
Duntlas, T.
Dundas, J. D.
Ebritigton, Lord
Edwards, Colonel
Ellice, E.
Elphiastone, 11.
Evan:, G.
Ewart, W,
Fergus, John
Ferguson, Sir A. C.
l'..irgoson, It.
Fergu,a9n, It. C.

.58.
P.Nhell, Captain
Pendarves, E. W.
Philips, Mark
Philips, G. R.
Potter, It.
Poulter, J. S.
Power, James
Pryme, G.
Rice, 'l'. S.
Robarts, A. W.
Roc
Roebuck, J. A.
Rolle, Sir R. M.
Rundle, John
Ruthven, B.
Scholetieil. J.
Scott, Sir E. D.
Scott, J. W.
Sharpe, General
Stanley, E. J.
Steuart, It.
Stewart, P. M.
Strutt, E.
Stuart, Lord James
Stuart, Villiers
TalfJurd,-T. Noon
Taiiemi, 11. \V 4
Thompson, T. P.
Thornely, 'l'.
Trelawney, Sir W.
Troubridge, Sir T.
Tulk, C. A.
Turner, W
Villiers. C. P.
Vivian, Major C.
Vivian, J. IL
Wak lc y, Thoin.ts
Walker, R.
Wallace, R.
Ward, H. G
‘Vason, R.
Cayt.
Whalley, Sir S.
White, S.
W gney, I. N.
Wit-bran:tin , G.
W.
IWood, C.
Wrightson, W. R.
Wrottesley, Sir J.

Alsager, Richard
AttwoOds M.
Bailley, JoSepli
Baillie, H. D.
Barclay, C.
Baring, F.
Baring, H. B.
13arneby, John
Bateson, Sir IL
Becket, Sir John
R
Bonham, Francis R.
Bradshaw, James
lirownrigg,
Bruce, C. L. C.
Brnilenell, Lord
Buller, Sir J. Y.
Canning, kiir S.
Cartwright, W. 11..
Chapman, A.
Charlton, E. L.
Chisholm, A.
Clive, Visa.
Con,lly, E. M.
Corry, H. L.
Darlington, Eall'of
I)unkar, George
Egerfon, W. T.
Egerton, til Fran.
Elit.y, Sir J.
Estoia, T. G. B.
Edcourt,T. S. 11.
Ferguson, G.
Follett, Hie W. W.
Forbes, W.
Forster, e.

.NORITY—NOES,
FE-mantic, Sir T.
Oaskell, J. M.
Gladstone,
Goulburn, H
Goulburn, Mr. Serjt.
Greisley, Sir It.
Halforr:, H.
Hamilton, Lord C.
Ilardinge, Sir 11.
Hardy, J.
Ilawes, B.
H ,wgins, J. 11.
Henniker, Lord
Hill, Sir It.
Hogg, J. W.
tiny, J. 11.
linglios, H.
Ingham, Robert
Inglis, Sir It. H.
Jackson, Serjeort
i6flllyis Earl
Jones, Wilson
Jones, T.
Knightly y, Sir C.
Leßoy, A.
Lo:rny, Dr. I'.
Lincoln, Earl of
Lygon. Colonel
Maclean, I).
Nation, Lord
14anners, Lsrd C.
M6ynoll, H.
Mordaunt, Sir J.
Mo.41(1, Sir 0.
Packe, C. W.
Parker, M.

TELLERS
Bannerman, A.
Hay, Sir A. L.

Patten, Wilson
Sir 11
Peel, Colonel
Pemberton, T.
Pentuddock, J If.
Perceval C. lonel
l'raed, \V. M.
Pringle, A.
Rae, Sir W.
Reid, Sir J. It.
Richards, John
Ridley, Sit M. %V.
Rog:, C.
Rushbrooke, Colonel
llyle, J.
Scarlett, Hon R.
Sheppard, 'l'
Sinclair, Sir G.
Smith, J. A.
Somerset, Lord G.
Stanley, Lord
Sturt, H. C.
Thomas, Colonel
Trevor, A.
110 ace
Vivian, John Ennis
Wall, 11.
Walter, .1.
Weyland, Major U.
Williams, 'F. P.
%Vortley, Ilon. J. S.
Young, J.
Young, Sir W. L.

TELLERS,
Clerk, S,r G.
Gordon, Hon. %V.

A hoax was practised on the London Missionary
Society, which, but for an accidental circumstance, might
have placed the meeting on Thursday last in an awkward pre-
dicament. Two letters were firwarded to Mr. Alers liankey,
the banker, and formerly the treasurer to the society, the one
containing a draft for 1001., purporting to be from Daniel
O'Connell, in token of his liberal feelings, as a Roman Ca-
tholic, towards the Dissenters ~ and the other a draft for
501., purporting to bcirom Mr. Thomas Duneombe, M. P., for
Finsbury. These letters were not opeaed until after the meet-
ing, otherwise the donation: might have been announced witlr
those which are usually made at the anniversary of the Lon-
don Society. On presenting the drafts at the bankers, to
whom they were addressed, the hoax was discoverel.

THE NEW MOSES.—The command is, " Thou
shalt do no work ;" yet the Jews had many exceptions to that
universal rule. War on the Lord's Day was not forbidden.
The priests worked without sin ; wood was gathered for the
service of, the altar, and beasts were slaughtered fur the morn-
ina• and evertin,v, sacrifice. Our own prieat;.• work only on the
Sabbath.r Children were circumcised on the Lord's Day.
The Jews kindled no fire on the Sabbath ; but they lived in a
hot country where fire could well be dispensed with. They
did not labour on the Sabbath, either in seed time or harvest ;
but their climate was regular and not varying like ours.
Crops would sometimes he lost here and the people starved if
they were not to harvest their wheat on a fine Sunday ; but in
Palestine the Jews enjoyed the regularity of a tropical climate.
The Jews were all agriculturists; they had no trade next to
no division of labour, and they could all be idle on one and
the same day ; to do which here, as Sir Andrew Agnew
wishes, would wreck our ships, burn our furnaces, destroy our
harvests, stop our communications, and speedily render the
land uninhabitable. fa addition to all these diversities which
make the law of Moses delivered in Palestine between three
and four thousand years ago to a community of shepherds and
agriculturists wholly inapplicable to our diversified society
living in a varying climate, there is plenty of proof that the
Jews did not observe the Sabbath in idleness and prayer, but
in festivity and gladness, an ob3ervanee which is maintained to
the present day.—Brighton Guardian.
LIBEL.—In giving a report of the trial of the
action recently brought against us for libel, we stated that the
expenses of our difference would be upwards of 5001. We
amountingva3oop/7 of other
have since that time. paid our bill of costs, amounting to 530/.,
expenses,in addi t addition a
ntdo
vvwhichesltalwl have to tp o payaid u
thepv crodists of
of p 0
sing the
rule obtained by the plaintiff, for setting aside the verdict in
our favour—the amount of which we have not yet ascertained.
Of course the plaintiff, Clark, was liable to the payment of
these costs ; but we never imagined that it would be possible
to recover a farthing from him ; and it was therefore no disap-
pointment to us to learn, that when an execution was issued
against him, neither he nor any property belonging to him
could be found by the officer,—Manchester Guardian.—[We
rejoice to perceive that a subscription having been set on foot,
upwards of ,400/. has been raised to indemnify our Contempo-
rary. Many of the firms resident at Manchester have sub-
scribed 101. each.l