The Sun.
London, England, 1849-02-22 00:00:00

LIVINGSTONE V. PROUDBOOT AND OTHERS.

The further arguments in this part-heard appeal were
resumed this morning, and occupied their Lordships the
whole day. The appellant was the minister a she' t time
ago of the Church of Cambusnethan, in the Presbytery of
Hamilton, in the county of Lanark, and the res-
pondents represented the members of the Presbytery
of Hamilton. It chanced that in the year 1835, a re-
port had become prevalent in the parish, to the effect
that the ministers had been guilty of certain acts of
theft. A lengthened negotiation was the result, in
which the heritors of the parish took a leading part,
with the hope of making such an arrangement of the
matters as would prevent any public exposure. These
negotiations not terminating is a way that was satisfac-
tory to the present appellant, he then made an appeal
to the General Assemb►y, by whom, in compliance with
his request, the matter was remitted to the
Presbytery of Hamilton, accompanied by instructions
that the case should be investigated in accordance
with the rules of the Church. The Presby.
tery of Hamilton was composed of the ministers
of what were denominated quoad sacra parishes. This
tribunal adjudged against the appellant. These parishes
were created in all parts of Scotland, by virtue of a law
which passed in the year 1834, and had never been chal-
lenged until the year 1840. From the judgment of that
tribunal the appellant made a further appeal to the
Synod of Glasgow and Ayr, by whom the judgment of
the furmer was affirmed, with the exception of one par-
ticular charge. The appellant thereupon entered a pro-
test, and applied for leave to appeal to the General As •
sembly. Ultimately the matter came before the Court of
Session, and from the judgment of that Court the present
appeal had been made.
Mr. Bethel! and Mr. Anderson were Counsel for the
appellants, and Mr. Rolt appeared for the respondents.
The arguments occupied the Court the whole morning

COMMON PLEAS.—(THIS DAY.)
;Sittings at Nisi Prius, at Guildhall, before the Lord
Chief Justice WILDE and a Special Jury.)
EINCAIRD AND ANOTHER V. WILLIS.

In this case Mr. Crowder, Queen's Counsel, Mr. Ser-
geant Channel, and Mr. Greenwood were counsel for the
plaintiffs, and Mr. Sergeant Byles represented the de-
fendant.

Mr. CROWDER, in stating the case, said the plaintiffs
were the owners of a vessel called the Baboo, of 500
tons, which had been in the habit of trading to China.
The defendants, who were the Shipowners' Towing
Company, were sued by their secretary, who was the
nominal defendant, under the provisions of an Act of
Parliament; and the Shipowners' Towing Company
having a number of tugs for the purpose of towing ves-
sels, were the owners of a tug called the Newcastle ;
and this action was brought to recover a compensation
in damages for the injury which had occurred
to their vessel the Baboo from the misconduct
and mismanagement of the delendant's servants engaged
in navigating their tug, the Newcastle. The Baboo had
returned on its homeward voyage from China in April,
1847, and having occasion for repairs was towed up to
the'doek of Messrs. Wigram, for the purpose of under-
going those repairs. On that occasion the Ship-owners,
Company was employed for the purpose. Having un-
dergone the necessary repairs at Messrs. Wigrams'
dock, on the 20th of April, 1847, the Baboo was taken
to the London Docks, and remained there until it had
completed its cargo, and was engaged by some pas-
sengers to go on an outward voyage. It was in May that
the arrangements had been completed, and the vessel
was about to proceed from the London Docks on its
voyage. On the 13th cf May all the neces-
sary preparations had been made. There were
twelve passengers to be taken out, and the vessel
was then destined for Sydney. On the evening of the
13th May it was necessary that some steam-tug should
be engaged for the purpose of towing the vessel out of
the London Docks and down the river, and the de-

f,tidents' tug was engaged on the fullowir,g morning. It
was necessary that advantage should be taken of the
state of the tide, and the vessel ought to have left the
London Docks somewhere prior to one o'clock. It
seemed that in consequence of some mistal-e having oc-
curred with the captain of the Baboo, in not having had
an opportunity of giving the necessary intimation to the
defendants for the purpose of sending their tug, no
tug arrived. In that emergency one of the plaintiffs en-
gaged the steam-tug called the Lion, belonging to an-
other and a rival company, the Thames Towing
Company. It was arranged that the Lion was
to take up a position just outside of the
Shadwell entrance to the London Docks, out of

which the Baboo would proceed in order to get
into the river. The Baboo was then teken along the
basin of the docks with the assistonco of some Nvater-
-I::',eEl'S boats to the entrance of the d0e1,.:3. At that time
the Lion was stationed outside, and the Newcastle also,
though no contract had been entered into with the Etter
in conscquenve of the message not having teached the
defendants. It was the business of the watermen to
hind over the hawser of the Baboo to the steam-tug out-
side the entrance. At that moment the Newcastle was
endeavouring to push itself towards the vessel for the
purpose of catching the hawser; the crew of the Lion
were trying also to do the same thing. The Newcastle,
however, succeeded in taking possession of the hawser,
and proceeded to tow the Baboo down the river on the
assumption that the Newcastle had been employed
for that purpose. The captain of the Baboo was ex-
ceedingly anxious that no time should be lost, because
they were just at that point of the tide when a few
minutes would have been of the greatest importance;
and, therefore, he did not interfere to prevent the de-
fendants towing his vessel. The crew of the Lion kept
following the Baboo and remonstrating with the cap-
tain until they arrived at Limehouse Reach. At that
time, without any the least assignable reason, and
acting with the greatest negligence, the tug Newcastle
began to slacken its speed. The captain of the Buboo
called out to them to go on ; but, all of a sudden, the
hawser attached to the Newcastle tug was loosened and
cast off, and the Baboo was cast adrift in the most dan-
gerous part of the liver, with S.S.W. wind. 'ibis pro-
ceeding had the effect of driving the Baboo ashore, and
it was for the damage she had sustained that the present
action was brought. _ _ _

Ttie case was not concluded when we went to

pros',

EXCHEQUER.-(THIS DAY.)
(Sittings at Nisi Prius, at Guildhall, before Mr. Baron
PLATT and a Special Jury.)
GRAPES V. BUNNEY.
_ _

Mr. Cockburn anti Mr. Barstow appeared for the
plaintiff; and Mr. Martin and Mr. Huinliey, and unother
Learned Gentleman, for the defendant.
The Postmaster-General, the Marquis of Clanricarde,
and Colonel Maberly, the Secretary of the Post-office,
were present on the bench.
Mr. CLCKBURN, in opening the ease, said this action
was brought against the defendant as the proprietor and
publisher of the John Bull newspaper, for a libel pub-
lished in that paper reflecting upon the character of the
plaintiff. Mr. Robert Grapes, the plaintiff, filled the
situation of letter-carrier in the employment of the Post-
office—a not very exalted and elevated conditiou in life
certainly, but one the humility of which, it would be
imagined, would have secured to him immunity against
attacks in a nee spaper of the aristocratic character
and pretensions of the John Bull. It seemed
however, according to the statement in the plea of justi-
fication, and the statement contained in the libel itself,
that Grapes had been instrumental in assisting Mr. T.
Duncombe, the Member for Finsbury, in bringing cer-
tain alleged abuses connected with the administration of
the Post-office before the attention of Parliament and
the public. He supposed, therefore, that Grapes was
thought worthy of a place in the newspaper as the sub-
ject of a most malignant and malevolent attack. It ap-
peared that certain parties connected with the Post-
office, among whom was a gentleman of the name of
Kelly, had taken upon themselves the preparation and
publication of a work, which was familiarly known to
all, and the merits of which he was not disposed to
deny, called the " Pest-office Directory." In preparing
that work Mr. Kelly was in the habit of availing
himself very extensively of the assistance of letter-
carriers, whose various duties took them to the different
districts of the metropolis, and afforded him the means
of acquiring the information he wanted. Some question
had arisen as to the propriety of employing men who
were paid by the public, and whose time ought to be ex-
clusively devoted to the public service, for the advantage
or gain of any private individual, complaints had been
made on the subject by some of the letter-carriers, and
among many others by the plaintiff, Grapes. A question
had also arisen with regard to what was called the early
delivery, which consisted, as he understood, in delivering
to particular individuals who were disposed to pay for
the accommodation, letters at an earlier period than the
public at large were enabled to obtain them. The con-
sequence of that practice was, that while those favoured
and privileged individuals obtained an early delivery
of letters, the letters to the puclic generally
were considerable delayed. A considerable number of
letter-carriers came forward to substantiate the charges
which had been made on those subjects, and Grapes
being among them, he acquired to himself the unfavour-
' able and hostile sentiments of Mr. Kelly and the subor-
dinates who were connected with him, and was ulti-
mately dismissed. Whether there was any real charge
which could be substantiated against him, whether there
was any real or just cause for his dismissal, or whether
circumstances which involved no criminality on his part
were not seized upon and made a pretext fur his dis-
missal by the persons to whom he had given offence, would
be matter for the consideration of the jury. But before
his dismissal, Mr. Duncombe having heard of the alleged
abuses in the Post-office, and being a most indefatigable
Member in exposing the abuses of public departments,
thought it his duty to bring the matter under the at-
tention of Parliament. It was in 1846 that he
first alluded to the subject in the House of Com-
mons, and in 1847, when he brought it forward
again, he intimated that ho would revive the subject
in the next session of Parliament, in the event
of his being re-elected for Finsbury. In the meantime,
however, a person of the name of Thacker, a letter car-
rier, who was hostile to Mr. Kelly, and was prepared to
substantiate charges against him and others, with respect
to those abuses, and another man named Ringrose,
sub-sorter, since charged with calls, zzling letters at the
Old Bailey, convicted and sentenced to transportation.
At the time of those convictions there appeared an arti-
cle in the John Bull in reference to the trials, but it was
only important so far as it introduced the name of
Grapes to the readers of the journal. The article,
however, which contained the libel complained of ap-
peared on the 24th of July, 1847, and was as follows;
" We shall hear more of Abraham Thacker; mark our
words ! So said we on the 10th inst., and we said truly.
Abraham Thacker was one of Mr. T. Duncombe's Post-
office informers, and was sentenced to be transported to-
day (unfortunate Abraham I) for embezzling letters. A
worthy associate of Abraham is fishing up dirty matters
for Mr. Duncombe of the vinous name of Grapes.
Robert Grapes has since been dismissed from the Post-
office for endeavouring to tamper with the witnesses by
whose evidence Thacker's guilt was proved. ' I have
received a great deal of information from Grapes,' quoth
the Hon. Member for Finsbury (information, we opine,
is not the only thing he has received from Grapes), and
therefore, Oh !—of course, therefore this charge of tam-
pering has been trumped up. Poor Grapes has been
plucked before he was ripe. All this is so natural a course
of events that nobody can doubt it. The fact is (only
Mr. Duncombe did not like to say so yet) Grapes, in-
stead of tampering with the witnesses, was merely en-
deavouring by his moral and religious influence to pre-
vail upon them to speak the truth respecting his crony
Abraham, the said witnesses being two perjured rogues
suborned by the Postmaster-General, or those wicked
and diabolical persons Mr. F. Kelly and Mr. W. Boken-
ham (the former, says Mr. Duncombe. 'is the greatest
tyrant ever employed in any department') to swear away
his life if they would. All this will come out next ses-
sion when Mr. Duncombe, if he is again elected for
Finsbury,' means to revive the stejeet. Meanwhile we
hope he will behave generously to poor Grapes, and
squeeze him into a good place of some sott or other,
since it is most manifest he has lost the one he had in
consequence of doing his (Mr. Duncombe's) dirty—no,
we mean his snow-white work. He has a pair of them
now on his hands—Abraham in the hulks, and Grapes,
pining, perhaps, in a back garret upon nothing a day
and finding himself. We are quite sure that the juice
of the grapes will be as poison to his lips so long as
Grapes (perhaps he is a married man with a family,
which would make a bunch of Grapes) is the victim of
this Kelly fever." Hetlr. Cockburn) could not conceive
anything more malignant than the spirit in which that
article was written, especially as it assumed, and per-
haps not without some reason, that the man Gropes,
with his family, would be compelled to starve in a garret.
The libel charged the plaintiff with tampering with the
witnesses who were called to prove the guilt of Thacker,
but he denied that he had done so, and he
called upon the defendant to make good his assertion.
He could not suppose that the article had emanated from
the editor of the paper, but strongly suspected that it
had been cut and dried by some gentleman connected
with the Post-office, and the plaintiff would have brought
this action against the writer of the article instead of the
publisher, but thedefendant refused to furnish him with
his name, and the only offer he made was to insert
any statement in the John Bull which the
plaintiff might think proper to make. The
defendant was therefore responsible for the libel,
and he had no doubt that he was backed up and assisted
by those officers of the Post-office under whose malig-
nity the plaintiff had suffered. There could only be
one construction put upon the case, viz., that the plain-
tiff had caused the displeasure of the Post office
authorities because he had furnished information
to a Member of the House of Commons, with a view
to a disclosure of the maladministration of that
department of the public service. Upon those grounds
he contended the plaintiff was entitled to the full umoun
of damages.

The publication of the libel, and the application of it
to the plaintiff, was then proved, and plaintiff's case
closed.

Mr. MARTIN addressed the jury on the part of the do-
fence, contending that the defendant had done nothing
more than his duty as a public journalist in comment-
ing, as he did, upon the trials at the Old Bailey. Be
maintained the correctness of the charge, that the plain-
tiff had been guilty of tampering with witnesses, in
order to deter them from telling the. truth. The Marquis
of Clanricarde exlmined into the truth of the accusation,

and decided that it had been proved; whet cupon he made
a minute, and dismissed the plaintiff from the Post-
office. If his Loniship had not done that, he would
have neglected his duty to the public. The only ques-
tion was, whether the plaintiff had been rightly dis-
missed; and if the jury thought he had, the verdict
would be for the defendant.. On the other hand, if a

verdict was found for the plai❑tiff, he contended that the
smallest possible amount of damages would be sufficient,
as he had suffered no injury whatt ver.
The Marquis of Clanricarde, Mr. Peacock, the soli-
citor of the Post• office, and Col. Maberley, the secretary,
were then brit fly examined, as to the cause of the plain.
tiff's dismissal—their evidence corroborating the state-
ment of Mr. Martin.

A witness proved that the article complained of was
in the handwriting of the late Mr. Mudford, who was
Formerly editor of the John Bull.
The case had not concluded wlien our reporter left.

•
SOMETIIING BINDING ON THE NOBILITY.-None
but Lords are allowed to receive the Order of the
Garter. We do not envy them, for the Garter is gene-
rally considered a fitting ornament for calves.—Punch.

LLOYD'S SHIPPING-1.-CFI-11:S DA Y•)
LONDON, FEB. 22.—Wind this day at, 3.1;:on W.t.;.\17.;
mods rate bre(z- and fine.

OrF PORT:iMOUTLI, FEB. 21.—Comet, Lla:7nira.
YARMOUTH, FEB. 21.—The Union, of GaLrni:ey,
went co the CroLa Saad this day, but got oil", pith le6s
of rudder, and with the assistanc3 of a tog, has been
brought into harbour.

WHITBY, FEB. 21.—The Star, Walker, of this port,
has put in here with lost of bowsprit, &c., having been
in contact with a barqac. The Newcabtle, brig, Robin-
son, of this port, in taking the harbour this morning,
struck the end of the east pier, anti went on shore about
half a mile to the south, anti will become a wreck.
LONDONDERRY, FEB. 20.—The Shamrock, from
Liverpool to Rio Grande, which put in here on the 12th
ult., with damage, drove from her anchors yesterday, and
struck on a bsnk on the east side of Louth, but got off
without damage.

LIVEZIPOOL: FED. 21.—Wind W.N.W. to S.S.W.Arrd. Sampson, Mobile; Blanchard, Blanchard,
Mobile; Alert, Marseilles. Sld. Mary IVirlch, Valpa-
raiso ; Caroline, Iteede, New Yoik ; Mary Florence,
New Yurk ; Kate, Ilowe, New York; Alary, Smyrna.
The Mary and Jane, from Cork, on shore near
Cro.by Foist. 011. Port, 21—Charles Chaloner, New
Orleans,

BELFAST, FEB. 20.—Wind W.—Arrd. 18, Agnes,
Smaliman, New York, with part of cargo thrown over
Conic, FEB 18.—S1d. Charks, Newfoundhnd.
DEAL, FEB. 21.—Wind N.W. to W.S.W.—Arrived
Gaston, New Yoik, and sailed for Bremen. Arrived
trom the River—Seringapatam, Rackett, Madras; Leo-
pard, Shire, Buenos Ayres ; Saline, Sullivan, Rio Ja-
neiro; John Cobbold, Hendley, Jamaica. Sid. Haidee,
Launceston, Van Die man's Land.

MARKET NEWS.-(THIS DAY.)
WI-IXTECHAPIEL.
There was a slight improvement in the demand for
the best meats at full prices. Otherwise the trade ruled
extremely dull. Bea, from 2s 2d to 3s 4d; Mutton,
3s to 4s 2d; Veal, 3s 8d to 4s 8d; and Pork, 2s 10d to
4s 4tl per 81bs by the carcase.
=EAT DX.ILIZZETS.
SouTHALL, FEB. 21.—Our market was excessively
dull to- tliq for all kinds of stock, the prices of which
were quite 2d per 81bs lower than last week. Beef from
2s 101 to 36 lUd; Mutton, 3s 8d to 4,i 8d; Veal, 10d
to 4s 4d; and Pork, 3s 8d to 4s 2d per 81bs., to sink the
offal.

ROMFORD, FEB. 21.—Calves were in moderate request,
at lull prices. Otherwise the trade was heavy, at droop-
ing currencies.--Beef, from 3s to 3s 10d; Mutton, 3s 'Bd
to 4s 8d; Veal, 3s 8d to 4s 4d; and Pork, 3s 4d to 4s 2d
per 81bs. Suckling Calves, lBs to 255; quarter old store
Pigs, 16s to 19s; and blilch Cows, with their small Calf,
141 to 171 lOs each.
LEWES, FEB. 20.—Trade generally flat, at depressed
quotations: —Beet; from 3s to 4s; Mutton, 3s 8d to 4s
10d ; Veal, 4s to 4s 4d ; and Pork, 3s 6d to 4s 2d
per 81bs.

ELAY NIARI{MTS.
SIVITIIFIELD.—Meadow Huy, 21 lOs to 31135; Clover
ditto, 31 lOs to 41 15s ; and Straw, 11 3s to 11 9s per
load. A fair average supply, and a steady demand.
CUMBERLAND.—Meaduw Hay, 21 lOs to 31 153
Clover ditto, 3/ 104 to 4/ 105 ; and Straw, 114 s to
1/ lOs per load. Supply moderately good, and trade
rather dull.

WIIITECHIPEL.—AIeadow Hay, 21 8s to 31 135 ;
Clover ditto, 31 los to 4/ 17s; and Straw, 11 2s to I/ 94
rer load. Trade rather dull, at barely late rates.

CORN AVERAGES.
GENERAL AVERAGE PRICES OF BRITISH CORN
For the Week ended Feb. 15,1848, made up from the Returns of tl.•
Inspectors in the different Cities and Towns In England and Wale.,
per Imperial Quarter.
WHEAT. I '
BARLEY. OATS. RYE. I BEANS. I PEAS.
PRICE .. 47s 011 29s 8C 17s 2,1 26s 9d I 29s 9d I 34s 4d
DUTIES ON FOREIGN CORN.
WHEAT. BARLEY. I OATS. I AYE. I BEANS. I PEAS.
Is Od Is Od Is 04 Is Od is 01 Is Od

EAST LINCOLNSHIRE RAILWAY
COMPANY.—(THIS DAY.)
The usual half-yearly general meeting of the above
company was held this morning, at the Great Northern
offices, in Moorgate-street; Mr, George Hussey Packe,
chairman of the board at directors, in the chair.
The reported stated that at the last ordinary meeting
the directors promised that the railway would be com-
pleted and handed over to the Great Northern Railway
Company in time to earn for the proprietors, before the
close of the year, au instalment of the annual rent of 61'
per cent. This pledge had been well kept, the directors
having had the satisfaction to receive from the Great
Northern Railway Company, and to pay to the share-
holders of the East Lincolnshire Railway Company, on
the 30th of January last, a quarter's dividend at the
guaranteed rent. The lease had been settled. The
directors had agreed with the Great Northern
Railway Company that this company should
raise, by the issue of debentures, the capital'
necessary to work the East Lincolnshire line,
provided that such capital did not exceed 150,0002; and
the directors had reserved ample powers for securing
the due repayment of such capital. In future, the reus
would be paid hall-yearly, in two dividends of 31. per
cent., on the 30th July and 30th January respectively,
and on the following days whenever either of these dates
fell on a Sunday. While the company remained a sepa-
rate corporation, there must be a committee of directors,
half-yearly meetings of the proprietors, appointments of
auditors, and other regular proceedings, in terms of the
Act; but it was proposed that both directors and Audi--
tors should act gratuitously.
'The balance-sheet represented the receipts to amount
to 619,1371. 143. I Id., less 2,435/. ss. 7d., still due to the
bankers, and the expeneiture to the seine amount, 10
that 2,4351. ss. 7d. was still debitted to the company.
The CHAIRMAN, in moving the adoption of the report,
had nothing to add to the information it contained.
They had completed their line, which he had no heal''
tation in saying would prove one of the best in the
kingdom, and it bad been handed over to the Greet"
Northern Company.
A PROPRIETOR wished to know whether the East
Lincolnshire shareholders would be liable for the
interest on the new debentures alluded to in the report?
The CHAIRMAN said no doubt they would be liable,
but they were guaranteed against loss by the Great
Northern Company. In fact that company would pal ,
the interest, and the East Lincolnshire shareholders
would receive their 61. per cent. clear of all incumbrances
but the property tax.
Mr. SELF wished to ask what had been the gross
earnings of the line during the two months it had been
in operation?
The SECRETARY replied, 6,700/.
Mr. SELF inquired if the lease to the Great Northern
Company had been executed?
The CHAIRMAN said it had.
Mr. JokolsoN said, in the event of the Great Northern
Company being unable to pay the guarantee, had they
the power to take the line into their own hands, and t°
sue the Great Northern Company for the difference be'
tween the receipts and the rent.
The CHAIRMAN replied in the affirmative.
The report was then adopted; after which
the retir-
ing directors and auditors were re-elected.
A resolution forfeiting seventy shares, numbered from
19,973 to 20,032 inclusive, from 18,628 to 18,632 in-
clusive, and from 8,112 to 8,116 inclusive, was then
agreed to, after which,
Thanks were voted to the chairman and directors and
the meeting terminated.

CYcnonama.—Among the numerous visitors of the
Cyclorama during the past week, were the following:—'
His Serene Highness Prince Lowenstein, Marquis of
Headfort and party, Earl and Countess Harrington, Lord
Gage, Lord Seagrave, Lord Kilmaine, Lord Williams
Lennox, Lady Lushington, Lady Harvey, Lady Whit'
more, Lady Bateman, Lady May and
party, Lady
Erskine and party, Hon. Sir E. Cust, Sir William
gi.r!?,
Lady Middleton, Sir T. B. Lennard and party, Sir
N. Buxton, Hon. Mrs. Calvert, Colonel Gardiner, an'
Captain Wemyss, &c.
THE COMMERCIAL BANK OF ENGLAND.—This
fortunate joint stock bank, which had its headquarters
at Manchester, and failed some six or seven years ago'
having involved the shareholders (like the Bank of Ma°
chester, the Imperial Bank, and the Northern and Con:
tral Bank) in heavy responsibilities, besides the loss of
all their capital, had a private meeting last week, and a
circular has bccn issued to the holders of share*
stating that although the debts are all paid off, causes
were in operation to prevent the final dissolution of al
company. A history of the concern, with particulars
how the money "had been dissipated," is promise
The total liabilities amounted to 1,9331. (including 7821"
the estimated amount of bills not sent in, and 8951. na
notes in circulation, and not yet paid). Against tbo
there was 462/. cash in hand, and money receivable from '
bankrupt's estates and other sources, I,Bs7l—leaving
balance of upwards of 3801.
EASTERN COUNTIES RAILWAY.—The forthcoming
dividend will be ss. Gd. per share, with a balance of be,
twaen 15,000/. and 20,0001. to be carried forward to the
June dividend.
The Bishop of Carlisle intends holding a genet
ordination on Sunday, March 4.

B//i7 LLS.
On the 11th inst., at 'Montalto, Ballynahinch, count,'
Down, the Hon. Mrs. Ker, the lady of D. S. Ker, of
daughter.

On the 15th inst., at Wimbledon, the wife of E. Fennell,
Esq., of a son.
O❑ the 15th inst., at Bedford, the lady of P. D. SotiPe4
Esq., of a daughter.
On the 16th inst., at Orme-square, Bayswater, the wife of
W. 11. Gardner, Esq., of a daughter.

MARRIE.
On the 15th inst., at WoolwichD,
T. W. Reeves, Escl*,
Church•house, Beckley, Sussex, to Mary, second daughter
the late J. Morley, Esq., Ripon, Yorkshire.
On the 15th inst., at Rickmansworth Charles A. Warr
Esq., of Lausanne, Kilburn, to Harriet, only daughter of •
S. Smith, Esq., of Melton-wood, near Brigg,Line‘ lnshire.ho
On the 'all inst., at Shirehampton, Uhicestershire, Jo
of
D. T. Niblett, Esq., eldest son of D. J. Niblett, Esq.,
Anne'
Haresiield-court, in the same county, to Caroline .
younger surviving daughter of the late D. A. Saunders'
Esq., of Glocester.

DIED.
On the 17th inst., in Baker-street, Charlotte Mawby,
sister
of Lieutenant-General Sebright Mawby, aged t-3.
On the 17th inst., in the Effra•road, Brixton, Elizabetii°
the wile of Charles Bacon, Esq., 01 the Stamps and Taxe4
Somerset-house.
On the 17th inst., at Blossoms Inn, Lawrence-lane, Char
side, Mr. J, Plater, aged 62.
On the 18th inst., at Haverstock-hill, Sarah, the wife of
Captain William Ticchurst, H.E.I.C. S.
On the '-Bth inst., at Park-square, W. 11. Lloyd, Esq t,
In the Cloisters, IV eamiuster Abbey, Charles Louis 1-1"'
youngest son of the Rev. H. li. Milruan.

London: Printed and Published by MURDO YOUIC.%I
No. 112, Strand, Printer, at Tim ce
Sun (a, N0.,,'"al
Strand, in the Precinct of the Savoy, in the county-
Middlesex, Thursday, February 22, 1649.

.-^ ~
~- 1

..--.

Th
Sf th
natio
Will
rant
Ore

COCO

PI SS

SOAP

RICE

, Pore
'4iooll

For
No 0

'Week I
Sunday:

Week 1)
Sunday
The TR
thnes.

z-aur,cl
!bitted to t
Olanibut
every qua,
1.1.110 A. T
--r
13Rtki.,71
rtinaw,
P.BBelek
Way, a nge
Porteratth
1111.,g, g
.Ovenatce
b,
tA S
The
bERS for
ilt,ncl Sped V.
Stra,
s•vred fron
Lenclers tt
ime
regetved

Lond

tepee Dire(
it,,Tt Of 1.1
e4l' di of ]
end ,
to e ii
bt addrea'

61. It
Y

4t, t
cant
but r 4
And /
BY th,
IVh,,
For h.
The t;

No
eta
I, t
thoow
After

And
end 81
4'Or y(
Nut of
tut a

Was a
vg

Ind
Pori
ror ht

Plaint,
• •
lime
4u 1 sc
wo
list
41, Of
killenll

Attc„
th "4111 i al
t"trael,
ltp
TIZIf °•b_er-1
(etc
gir,"7
Aut,",thlg C
14,at
Aixt 4T
uh.,'l
1
lire
oakaoitt
oax
oh rilist,
IN "Ind 64'
of
tiv
441 Wri
45aten
`4l T:
bi.e eat "
us% Coat
o,
0
•v
/le '6,.
tiamt! qtzik
Sittiere
ttkurn,Panlttie,

R Oh Ott,
ltd b:g7
kohe' if not i
—eY ret
tikra, P
a„r,
lard 3,-„. I
Caati zonr,Bl„
aeainl/4,0.3t imp
of t
;41 reg
ave >R
TXt icoerD t their j
tolla
nttite -13
their
and ,
WlyoaYou,
t4,26:7,.
Pray