The Sun.
London, England, 1814-11-30 00:00:00

ADJOURN M ENT.

Mr. VoNsossy, while he disclaimed every idea
of anyAisposition to throw obstacles in the way of
Ministers, or to retard the public business, which
he knew he had it in his power effectually to dont
-the present moment (there being nothing like 40
Members in the House), begged to suggest to the
Chancellor of the Exchequer that it would be a
great accommodation to the House, if he would
.postpone the Adjournment from Thursday to
Friday. He hoped the • Right Hon. Gentleman
would haVe 'no objection so far to accommodate
the House, considering that a motion•of an Hon.
Member already stood for eliseussion on Thursday.
Pie CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER conceived
;that there was nothing to hinder him from mov-
-ing to-morrow, that the House should, at its
ris-
ing on Thursday, adjourn to the day he had men-
tioned„ •

Mr•. BANKES conceived that the motion alluded

to by the liit;ht lion. Gentleman (Mr. Ponsonby)
could "not lead to any letw;thened di,:cusion. It
V was merely for harpers for future consideration.
Mr .CRoKEri thoaght there could hardly be any
objection to produce the papers, if they were pre-
viously pointed out. •
',- Mr. LIORiJER- %CRS bappV to hear that there, was
so great a disposition to produce the Papers he in 4
tended to move for 4 : Ad trusted he should see the

. . . . .
sqtne ditpbsitibn to ade.ddiAttlOdAe !tilt; iEi the 6d-
Setreory, as
,lte was happy to observe Eu
the lihuirAity. Lie hoped, howev•:r, that the itio-
t ion of Adiourhinent; if id be made on Thursday;'
should he postponed to Iti thotion.
The CI+AtI'Ci.LLOR of,th EXCHEQUrEt said, he
should press !notion O Adiourunteitt,-at what-
ever hour ;' Ist►t he had nts objectidn to bring it
forward to,nitnrow.

The SPEA.,AEIt .said, to accelhiitte a notice was
out of the practice of that [louse.
Mr. W. POLE was convinced there would be no
necessity for debating the question for production
of. the Papers, proi'ided a list of them was Vco-
,
duced. Here the ihatter th
Lord Wahingham's Annttity Bill, and the Irish Glass Act
Bill, were severally committed, anti the Reports on each or=
dered to be received to-mom Ow. -
Mr, Alderman SMITH brought in the Bread Assize Bill,
whi.ch was read a first time and ordi:Tod to be read a second
time to-marfow. • . .
Mr. LocfulAßT gave notice that be should to-morrow
move for leave to bring in a Bill to regiitate the right' f Vot4
ing in Boroughs, Cities, andfrowns
Mr. IDLE obtained leave to Jlying in a Bill for the better
Paing, Lighting, &c. Kentish Town, iii th,! Parish of St.
Pancras. Adjourned.

LAW INTELLIGENCE.

COURT OF KING'S BENCH, N0v.29•

SITTINGS AT NSTER.
phis day the Sittings after Mich:win-lasi Term
for Middlesex commenced at 'Westminster Hall.

%VINDUS V. MINCHINGTON.

• This was an action of trespass. The plaintiff
is an Attorney, and the defendant a young Special.
Pleader. Both the parties resided, on the same
staircase, in Brick-court, in the Temple. The
plaintiff, On account of ill-health, was a consi-
derable time absent at Brighton ; brit before he
went he took the precaution to have his cellar se-
cured by new locks, &c. :r 1 e defendant applied
to the Benchers for collaring to his chambers,.and
was told that he might take any he found unoc-
cupied under his own staircase. Under this
permission he thought proper to break open the
plaintiff's cellars, and take possessiOn of. them.
In the cellars Was a considerable quantity of Port
in bottles, and some empty bottles.: defend-
ant took a dozen of the latter to fill with.his own
cider, and also made tree with one bottle of the
plaintiff's wine to taste it. Wheu the 'plaintiff
came home tie remonstrated with the defendant
on his conduct, and claimed to have his ccliar
restored to hint ; but the defendant refused, al-
leging that the plaintiff eras tint a Member of the
lon ; and that he, as a Member, had a right to
pre-occupation • He was therefore red4ced to bring
an action of ejectment, to recover the posses-
sion of his -cellar, and to bring thepresent,action.
to recover the costs' of that action and the alite
of his bottles. His Counsel disclaimed any idea
of asking for damages beyond what would cover
the expellees the defendant had wantonly. pot Lint
to. These facts being proved, Lord ELLE.Nno-
uouou reprobated the conduct of -the defendant,
and obset veil that a person of less' rank inight have
had to answer the appropriation or the empty
bottles in another place.
The Jury found for the plaintiff, damages 1001.
THE KING UPON THE PROSECUTION OP THOS. ANNIS

• V. Tl-10,i. ALLIMY..
This tt-as an-indictment for an ass-ault- ani false
imprisonment against t►he defendant, a 'leadle of
the manor of East Smithfield.

The plaintiff, an under Officer of the Customs,
was also the -protector of a wonn4n mho keeps.a
lodging-house in the teighhourbood,of the Tower,
and not liking the complexion of a black man
who had paid two for his lodging, did
not choose to have him " chummed" upon him,
but gave the black some pretty unequivocal
proofs of hiS antipathy against 'him. For the
assaftlt alleged to have been committed upon
the black, Allden went with a warrant to appre-
hend Annis, and the taking him to the watch-
house, and locking him tip on this charge, consti-
Otted the offence' for which be was now indicted.
The warrant having got " John Ennis'," instead
-of " Thomas Annis,". the Court held that this
inaccuracy was fatal, and therefore the warrant
could not b? proved in justification.
_ The Jury, tinder the direction of the Court,
found the defendant guilty, observing, that the
Court would consider the merits of the case when-
the defendant was brought up for
,julg.nent.

POLICE INTELLIGENCE.