The Sun.
London, England, 1836-02-10 00:00:00

DUBLIN MA

ENDING 5

Average:.
23 9

Y 7 0

1,022 Wheat, per barrel 20 stone
n Bore l6 stone
441 Barley
98:3 031 s
10,8f8 Flour, per cwt ... 8 stone...."
205 0atmea1..........--..... 8 stone
Sold to Bakers only.
8,5C5 Cwt. Flour I II 6 I 16 0
Average price of Wheat and Flour 34., 40. per sack
Receipts of Flour, 12,467iFirsts from 14r•,. 6d. to 16s. Od.
Seconds fro 111. 01 to Ins. 6d.
Sales of Do. 10,Rfrom,fnirds
• YRICE OF BREAD.
QUartern Loaf (Ad. I Half Quartern ..............
___

14 0
9 0
5 0
11 0

30 0
14 0
10 U
14 0

CORK MARKETS.—Feb. 6.

15 8 1
10 8 i
- 0 A
11 8

13 3

Wheat (per 0.05t.)...13s Od. to:2os. 0.1 Oats (per 14st) 9s. 4d. to 10s. 9d.
Barley (per 165t.)...10 6 13 6 1 Flour (per cwt) 5 0 14 0
Oatmeal (per cwt.) los Od. to 1 is. Od.
Beef, bd. to 6d. • Mutton, bd. to t.:d. Vent, 6d. to Bd. ;
Pork, 2d. to :41. ; Fresh Butter, 10d. to 121. per lb,
PRICE OF Bu CTE R.
To the Merckants.
•

To the Countr!
82s.

First Quality
Second
Third
Fourth

Fifth
Sixth

0G5....

Fii .....

~ ~~~ --

CLONMELL MA
Per
s. d. s. d. s. d. s. t.l.
New Rutter 90 0t092 U Hides (nrFv) '') oto n 0
Oatmeal t l3 6 ;4 0 Bacongs . '..,9 7 0 0
Rendered Lard 0 32 0 Heads 20 0 (1

it KETS.—.Feb. 5.
Cwt.

• Per *Bg.
Flour, Second "6 0 26 61 Flour, Thin la 20
—Household...--4 0 24 6 —fourths
Per Barrel.
Rapeseed 20 0 0 I Barley
Here 8 0 10 0 Coals

0 '2l G
hi 4

l'er :4013e.
Wheat Oll 01:2 Tallow (r0ugh)...... 4 6 5 (1
Ora.•,

KILKENNY

iNI,IRKEI'S.

Wheat (per barrel) 18s. 3d. to 21s. 6d
Harley.
lkts

Beef (per lb.
Mutton 0
Pork 0

. 3(t. to Os. scl
3 0 5
2 1.1 3

Four (per bag).— 14 0 26 0 Veal
Iletter(perewt.)... 90 0 92 0 Fresh Down. olu 1
I;Jeou rigs ...... 27 0 29 0 salt Ditto
Coals 1 0 1• 1 Potatoes (per 5t.)... 0 2 0 3

SCOTCH MARKETS.
HADDINGFON CORN MARKET.•Fets. 5.

First ~..
Second
1 bird
TA ere were

First
,ecund
Third .

Wheat. I Barley. I Oats. I 14' ease. Ilealis.
4 0.1141 43s Oil :11 (ht 340
ass :'2S: ad 22s (XI :13. Od 31s (ld
:335 lid 0.1 I 19.-0.1 —s Od .; Oti
539 qrs. of Wheat in ;nark et,.5:6 whereof were solo.
2.3 Nsoht --0 ure).
Ti. 17s. 7.1 0.:'2.th,.

verage

ALKEITi
‘Ar'lleat.
44s 6d
:18.; tht
Od

CORN MARKET.

Feb. 4.

Barley. 1 Oais. i.f.,-.se, Bean..
';:ib 6:1 1 25..., 0.1 36s 0,1 3i Od
'27s 0d I 223 4tl :3,L Od3oi 11,1
22s 0,1 ' Pis NI 2i- IQ :....'6,. (1(1

SPIRIT OF THE PUBLIC JOURNALS.

ABSTRACT

From a heavy press of Parliamentary, and other intelligence,
we are again obliged to content ourselves with extracts from
the Morning Journals. In a leading article on the subject of
Lord John Russell's propoacd commutation of tithe in Eng-
land and Wales' the Morning Chronicle observes—
. " The Bill applies to all descriptions of tithes, and to lay as well
as clerical owners. Objections will no doubt be made to the fixing
the tithe according to the crops which may haie been hitherto
raised. In the case of some crops, the neighbourhood of a thriv-
ing town which may go to decay in a few years may have led to
their cultivation and it seems hard that the proprietor should be
burdened with a payment not determined by the qualities of the
soil, but the accidental expenditure on it. However, we will not
anticipate objections. The great point after all is the snaking tithe
a permanent rent-charge. When once the tithe has been fixed,
however unsatisfactory the settlement may at first be, a door will
be opened to improvement, and capital will be embarked freely,
without fear of the tithe-owner. It is, indeed, impossible to over-
estimate the advantage which will be deris ed from a settlement of
the question. The Scotch tithes were settled on a simpler plan :
the tithe was taken at one-fifth of the rent, and a power was given
to redeem at nine years' purchase. There is, we know, a strong
wish throughout the country to take a certain proportion of the
rent as the tithe."

The Morning Post, writing on the same subject, says :
" We must refer our readers to the speeches in Parliament for
such information as they afford with respect to Lord John Russell's
plan for the commutation of tithe. His speech appears to us to be
so obscure, confused, and entangled that we abandon, at once, all
hope of being able, within the time which can be afforded for that
purpose, to extricate, from the jumble of words, anything like an
accurate and perspicuous account of the details or even of the prin-
ciples of the measure about to be introduced. All we now can say
without respect to the plan is, that it borrows its machinery from.
Sir Robert Peel's Bill of last year ; but deviates from some of the
most important principles of that measure. One of the chief de-
viations respects the time to be allowed for voluntary commutations,
which in the new plan is much more limited than in that of last
year. The general feeling seems to be that this alteration is any-
thing but an improvement. Upon the whole, however, we feel
bound to say, fram the temper displayed by the House, that the
measure of the Noble Lord is not threatened with any determined
or formidable opposition. With some manifest improvements,
which Sir Robert Peel and other Conservative statesmen will pro-
bably think it their duty to propose, there does not at present ap-
pear any reason to doubt that the project may become law."
The Morning Herald contents itself with general condem-
nation of the character and composition of the Melbourne
Cabinet :
The name of one man or of another has no influence with us.
We look merely to the ability of men to serve the country effec-
tually. We look to the power of their minds—the influence of
their characters—the weight of their connections—their ability, in
short, to preserve the dignity-, and to direct the energies of Lire
British nation. We appeal to the sober sense and to the national
sentiment of the people to determine whether the dregs of the
Whig Admitistration and the wild head of the Irish Agitators shall
be preferred t 6 men whom Europe looks up to with respect, and
England knows to be the ablest among her Statesmen. We desire
to see the Constitution preserved, while proved abuses are removed,
and practieal improvement steadily, vigorously, and successfully
promoted. We see no reasonable chance of these great objects
being attained, except through a Ministry powerful in talent, in
character, and in influence. Such a Ministry we have not at pre-
sent, but such a Ministry we may have—and to that first great
object we think the attention of all real Constitutional Reformers
should be directed."