The Sun.
London, England, 1814-11-29 00:00:00

DIVIDENDS.

Dec. 17. P. D. Abbott, Powis-place, Great Ormond-street,
insurance-broker—Dec. 17. C. Burt, Duke's Head-passage,
Newgate-market, vietimiler—Dee. 17. G. Jackson, Swan-
. street;Kent-road, mealtnan—Dec. 17. G. Gill, Charles-street,
Berkeley-square, saddler—Dec. 17. P..Short,Carnaby.street,
Cartiaby-market, victualler—Dec. 17. S. Mobbs, Southatup-
. ton, milliner—Dec. •17. R. Ellis, Earl-street, Blackfriars,
provision-broker—Dec. 17.. J. Wall, 1,310 ad-court, Long-acre,.
tailor--Dec. 17 H. Phillips, Worthing, Sussex, wine-mer-
chant—Dec. 17. T. Forty, Bermondsey New-road, wine-mer-
chant—Dec, 17. J. Smith, Chelsea, surgedu—Dec. 17. R. and
T. Renuards,
_Kiugston-upon,Hull, merchants—Dec. 17. J.
W. Harvey, Haillop-hall, Essex, banker—Dec.Squire,
and S.' Sawyer, Bristol, merchants—Dec. 3. T. Edwards,
Mincing-lane, broker—Jan, 3. A. Nord blad and IL Middle

tdh*,-ISinl4tron-upoh-Heill, therchants,—Dec. 20. M. Richards,
Nauxhall, Warwickshire, dealer.,--Dcc. 17. W. Ewer, Little
Love-lane, Bermondsey, tuerehant—Dec. 17. J. Haywood,
Cateaton-street, wareliouseman--Dec. 19. J. Mason, Brad-
. ford,.Wiltshire, linen-draper--Dec.,l7. B. Heseltine, Nicho-
las-lace; wholesale tea-dealer—Dec. 17. W. Calrow, Angel-
court, merchant—Dec. 17. J. Morris, Greenwich, linilder-L,
Dee. 17. G. Palmer, Plymouth, haberdasher—Dec. 17. J. B.
Spencer, Behrhinder-lane, factor—Dec. I. W. Hardy, Cheaip•
side, raerchant—Dec. 17. .1. Goodwin, „Manchester; calico-
Manufacturer--Dec. 17. G.- ICC 4, Great Pulieney-street,
Golder-square; tailor,Jan. 17. J. Jenkins, ('ow-court, Ro-
t tier t In, timber-merchant—Jan. 17. A. and C. Gordon,
Clfurch-street, Soho, tailors—Dec. 18. H.Jonei Northwich,
Cheshire, diAper—Dec.l7. J. Simpson and W. G. kairinan, Old
'Change, :actors—Dec._ V.. !'.'O'Neill; A ibion-stre;:t,. S:actors—Dec._tnerchant,-.4.)cc. 17. W. IL Parker, Hebden, Yorkshire, Cot-
ton-twiSt-spiiin6rL--iic. 17. J. Tripp and J. Dyer,. Bristol,
wine-merchants—Dec., 17. J. and J. Tyrrell, Maidstone,
Kent, ironmongers—Dec. 17. J. Phillips, Oxford-sifeet,
fruiterer—Det. 20. J. Philciaz, Briglithelnistone' Sussex,
builder—Jan. 3. It. Ward, Stretton Staffordshire, victualler
Dec: 17. J. Purche,e. Lncas-street, Gray's Inn-lane,
Dec. 2. T. Breary, Derby, hosier.
CERTIFICATES—Dec. 17'. .

. .. _ .
..
H. White; Drury4ane, a pot Ucary-1-1: La tu bden, Bristol.
pin-manufacturer—G.-,Chadwip, , Brassington,, Derbyshire,
corn-factor—M. Collins, Old 'Chinge, Ivarribouseman—E:
Spencer,,; Billiter-lane,, merchant--J. Maio,. Northampton,
ironmonger—A. and E. Sheppard, Bristol, hosiers-=J. Ly..
cett,Btdwardine, ' Worcestershire,. glove-tuanufacturer—:.W.
Gooch, Canterbury, gun-smith. , ... .. ,

, .
PARTNEBSHIPS'.:DISSOLVED.
J. Bell, .1. J. and S Wagstaff, Croydon; Sur.rey,',vine.and
brandy-merchants—J. J. ;Tillman and K. Marshall, NeWeas-
tle-tipun-Tyue,-corn-factors—,T; H. Boore,:.W T. aild W.
Bannister,. New,street, Covent-garden, linen-drapers--'P.
Millie and J. Smith, 'Union-street, BishopSgate-street,
Weavers—R. and W.,Tomlinsim, Thomas-street, Poplar-row,
•NEwington, Suricy, stone-masons—J.J. Lord and P, Budd,
I?lyntouth-41ock; Devonshire, spirit-merchants—P. M`Capile/
and J. L. Wallace; Liverpool, merchants—J. Broadhurst- and
C. Gratrek, Walsall, Staffordshire; Pedler and
R. Reap, jun. Liskeard, Cornwall, surgeons—W. and R.
Kidd, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, linen-drapers--& Clements and
J, Raven, :Burton-upon-Trent, Staffordshire, saddlers—G.
and W. Bowler, Haughton, Lancashire, hat-manufacturers—.
H. anefT-D-Rothwell •J. G. Kent, and T. Outhwaite, King-
street, Cheapside, wholesale Todd; K.
James, J. Ewer, and J. Thompson, Bristol, threshing-ma-
chine manufacturers.. . . •

LAW INTELLIGENCE.

COURT OF CHANCERY, Nov 23.

AGAR 0. THE PADDING'idN CANAL COMPANY.

An appliCation was made in this case, for an
attachment to issue against the defendants, who
it WaS stated, had disobeyed the injunction of the
Court, restraining them from carrying the line of
canal over the plaintiff's premises. His Lordship
refused the motion, on- the ground that he bad no
proof that the defendants had intentionally abused
the authority of the Court. There seems to be
some difference between tl►e plan of tl►e Canal
the possession of the plaintiff,and that in the hands
of the.defendants.

The LORD CHANCELLORi with a view to an
equitable settlement of the di'spute between the
parties, requested to have both plans-sent him.
SIR W. CURTIS ALDERMAN, V., THE MARQUIS AND