The Sun.
London, England, 1849-06-07 00:00:00

HOLLAND.

AMSTERDAM, JUNE 4.—The transactions on the
money market were altogether of a favourable ten-
dency to-clay—all the tunds, national as well as
foreign, were rated at higher exchange; and French
stock not merely recovered its former tone, hut closed
one per cent. higher than yesterday.—Amsterdam
Courant, June 5.
THE HAGUE, JUNE 4 —Yesterday the Minister of
Justice, M. Curtius, took official leave of all the
gentlemen connected with his department, and in-
troduced M. Von Wickers, his successor. M. Cur-
tius, in a pleasant address to his former assistants,
exhorted them to discharge their duties to his
ruc-
oessor with the same zeal and earnestness which they
had invariably displayed while he was in office.
Nothing further has transpired respecting the
resignation of M. Bund, the Minister for the
Colonies.
The Second Chamber will resume its duties to-
morrow.
The Meats Courant contains the law abolishing
the duty on vermicelli and maccaroni. It likewise
publishes the law for the travelling expenses, &c.,
of the members of the Chambers.
In regard to the diplomacy of the Hague the Nation
says—
•' We are lost in conjectures respecting the pro-
jc•ct of the Cabinet of the Hagu-; one thing is
eviden', that the Queen Dowager is acting the
pert
etothf,a,
ft al: Mrhea_aersi,atte'El
iepirl:e:nont.ehde. It appears that a
erected,f
md e ael oonnisp, for,d the
France. A new Kingdom of the Netherlands is to be
ia Belgium,nd,
,t h ofh
willt e
clot
nht:ph;nuei
tiru,sephins elapuor:osstvtltaorisftnpeeeaponteolyosclorailnologfsat suniiadslilBiXnrosV barrieral
l'wb'noiocolutleh(ift'
fifteen millions of inhabitants: Protected by Prussia
peace will b-.) secured permanently to Europe on the
side of France. This is what report says, time will
show how far there is truth at the foundation."

is 12 per taille,which,
MONEY MARKET.--The premium on gold at Paris
at the English Mint price of 31. 17s.
100. per ounce for standard gold, gives auexchange of
25.45; and the exchange at Paris on London at short
being 25.47 k, it follows that gold is 0.10 per cent.
dearer in Landon than in Paris. By advises from
Hamburgh the price of gold is 439 per mark, which,
at the English Mint price of 31. 17s. 10i:i. per ounce for
standard gold, glees
an exchange of 13.12; end the
exchange at Elamburgh on London at short being
, l3 11i, it follows that gold is 0.23 per cent, dearer in
SIR JOHN FRANKLIN'S EXPEDITIoN.—The United Hamhurgh than in London. The course of exchange at
States Uoyernment hcute tt.as taken steps to prosr..e New York on London is tosi per cent., and the par of
search after Sir John Franklin's expedition. It appear„ exchange between England and America being 109 23-40
by a telegraphic dispatch from Washington, that Captain r.):rcent.. it 1 Ilows that the exchange is 1.08 per cent.
Wilkes is ta have command of on, O'' -the ships. In . againstb England. But the quoted exchange at New
letter relative to the search for Sir John Franklin, Capt. York elm; for bills at 60 days' sight, the interest must
Wilkes says that time would not permit, this winter, t 0 be
make any effort in the Arctic Ocean in search of .Sir . BLACK BARLEY,---A beautiful specimen of black
John Franklin, other than for the Navy Department to barle ~ healthy and strong in the stem, was brought to
di•patch 'a smaller vessel from the western coast of nut. office
.for inspection yesterday, having been grown
America to notify to the whale-ships that they should by Mr. Nixon, at Union ]fall, near Lemiugton, in this
be on the look out. He d(ia. that •' what is now required county. The stems are three feet in length, and there
i, a speedy exploration of the Wellington channel, The are six rows of corns in each ear. The seeds were sown in
distance from our shores is not gr.eater than th ,t to November last, and should the present fine weather con.
Europe, and the voyage may be retr'ily perterna, din 45 tinue
. the crop will be fit for the sickle in a very short
would be in time
d tys. IF vessels were now fitt,(l, theY time. . N t only is the yield prolific, but what is of
f4.r. the s,Aason, which opens abou! the middle of July, grpeata imp ,rtance to the farmer, it comes to maturity
and would he able to explore this channel thor!imi goy ,
sat'ter Yt.. Lost he will be able to obtain a gr-en crop
to its furthest extent or navigable point, and, if nut
it ,
' tract I .IThe aced was introduced into this dis-
succour, they will ascertain whether Sir John Frair in
Inn, it2;l i a r.
Rogerson, of the Crown and Thistle
had taken that route, and return safely back before , _. s t,"vo, last ram from Cheltenham, where it
winter, with tidings." I was first grown from a few seeds found in the jacket
, pocket of a sail() .
Coaw.--Two fine samples of wheat in the ear were .
tory of which i r after his death, but, the o his- ,
exhioited at Canterbury on Saturday. The reports from
will s involved in obscrurity. Mpreviousr 1
have much
the country are generally favourable. There is promise his
nosses,i ' pleasure in exhibiling the specaneus in
of a large crop, and, with few exceptions, in every de- '" • 'n to the farmers attending our market, and I
acription of 'grain.—Kentish Gazette. _;others interested in the sub' t. N a Journal.
subject.—Nett evicas 0

LAW IN TELLIGEN CE.
COURT OF QUEEA'S BENCH, June 6.
THE QUEEN V. PARHAM.

This was a writ of quo warrauto, issued by this
court, to ascertain by what authority Mr. Perham held
the office of judge of twelve district county 'courts,
under twelve different appointments in Worcestershire.
The question to be decided was whether one person was
able to hold the appointment of judge of more than one
district at a time.

Sir F. KELLY, in support of the rule, contended that
one person could not under the statute hold more than
one appointMent as judge of a county court, and there.
fore that there ought, to be a separate person appointed
for each district.

The ATTORNEY-GENERAL, who showed cause agniust
the rule, contended that one person was competent to
bold office as judge of 100 county courts under 100 sepa-
rate appointments, if he was able to fulfil the duties of
each trice. If there was a separate appointment to
each district there would be 640 judges of county courts
in England and Wales. The same observations he said
:applied to the high-bailiffs and clerks. One person
could be clerk or high bailiff to several different courts.
He submitted that Mr. Parham was entitled to hold the
several appointments.

Sir F. KELLY to-day replied.
The COURT took time to consider their judgment.

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, June 6.
(Sittings in 13inco.)
lIINNERSLEY V. lINOTT.—A DISQUISITION ON NAMES.
In this case the plaintiff, au endorser of a bill of ex-
change for 651. 103., brought an action against the de-
Cendant as the acceptor, and declared against him by the
name of '• John M. Knott," being that by which he had
Aigned the note; but without stating in the declaration
that the defendant had so signed it. To this declaration
the defendant demurred specially, and assigned as the
ground of his demurrer that the declaration had not pro-
perly set forth his Christian name, nor assigned any
reason under the statute 3d and 4th Wm. IV., c. 42, for

was•acted upod by the Courtof Exchequer in the subse-
qut.nt case of " Miller v Hayes," and as it appears to me
the case is precisely similar to the present, I think we
must decide in favour of the demurrer.
The other Judges concurring,
Judgment for the defendant.

POLICE INTELLIGENCE.
GUILDHALL.
Mrs. Catherine Stultz was again brought up for final
examination before Ali:lsm:lan Gibbs and Circler), on the
charge of commissioaing Mr. Barton, of Throgmorton-
strew. stockbroker, to purchase 1,000. worth London
and North-Western Raikey stock, wh-ch stock was
purchased, and which she refused to pay e r, or the loss
thereon, amounting to 371. 18s.
Mr. Huddlestor,, the barrister, and Mr. nobler, the
solicitor, attended as before, to ple secute on behalf of
some members of the Stock Exchange, and Mr. Wontner
attended to watch the case for the pri-oner.
Mr. Huddle -ton said that since the last examination
they had not ha 1 sufficient time to obtain euch evi-
dence on certain points as to saeisfy the mind of the
worthy Alderman. On the last occasion the points. he
understood were, first, that no evidence had been
produced to show that the prisoner had no means
and, secondly, that the piece of paper was not
of sufficient value to ju*tify a committal, and th it,
in fact, it was not a valuable do,cument. With respect
to the first point, he should have produced Mr. Bur-
goyne, the father of the prisoner-, but a letter had been
received from a medical kkmtlernan named Fenton, who
said that Mr. Burgoyne was in a bad state of health, and
if brought to London at present th excitement might
prove fatal to him. Under those circumstances ho was
unable to prove she was a person witeout means. With
regard to the next point, he contended that the contract
note, even if not valuable security, could" be treated as
goods or chattels, and she obtained it under false pre-
tences. 'ln support of -this view, in the case of the
Queen v. Perry, 1 Dennison's Crown Cases, p. 69, tried
at the last spring assizes, before the fifteen Judges,
a prisoner was charged in one c .unt of the indictment
with stealing a cheque for 13/ 9s, 7d.; in another count
for stealing a piece of paper value one penny, when it
was held that, supposing the cheque to be a void cheque
(as being contrary to the provisions of statute 55 Geo.
c. 184), it would still sustain the charge laid in the
second count.
Alderman GIBBS—You have not shoe n me any evi-
dence that she had not the money in her possession when
she commissioned Mr. Barton.
Mr. Huddleston—Suppose she had succeeded in
getting the shares from Mr. Barton under her repre-
sentations, that would have been a misdemeanour. Then
came the question, did she attempt it; and he certainly
was of opinion that she did. With respect to her means,
her father could, at some future period, prove that she
was worth nothing.
Alderman GIBBS—He could not prove anything be-
yound hearsay, as he lives in the country and she in
London,. However disgraceful her conduct may have
been, he considered there was no case established against
her, and therefore she was discharged. If at any future
time sufficient proofvws obtained, then they could give
her into custody again.
Alderman GIBBS (addressing the prisoner)—Did you
receive a letter at the Compter from your brother Bur-
goyne? Mrs. Stultz —I did.
- Alderman GIBBS—WeII, I have a copy of it, and you
now know what I think of you.
Mrs. Stultz held down her he ad and made no reply.
She was then discharged from custody.
SOUTH W A BK.
William Richards, an undertaker at Kennington, was
brought before Mr. Cottingham, charged with uttering
to the Equitable Life Insurance Company a forged po-
licy of insurance on the life of Walter Wilson for 206/.
Mrs. Staff stated that the prisoner was her brother,
and that some time ago their father died, leaving by will
his property, which was to be equally divided between
them. Amongst the property b: queathed was a policy
effected in the Equitable Insurance Company on the life
of a person named Wilson, which was assigned over to
her father, and by him at his death .the amount of in-
surance was to have been equally divide d between her
and her brother (the prisoner). On calling at the in
surance-office, however, a few des) s age, on ihe subject,
she was informed that the prisoner had produced a do-
cument assigning the whole amount of the policy to
the prisoner, and it bore her father's signature: She,
however, represented at the insurance office that it
was a forgery, and on thet account the money which
was to have been paid over to the prisoner
was withheld, until the result of the present
proceedings was known, and that he established his
right to receive it. She added that her fatla r sent for
her a few days previously to his decease, and informed
her that he had left all his personal property, share and
share alike, between her and her brother, mentioned the'
the policy of insurance referral to was deposited in a
tin box, and that she was to receive halt the amount
when it was paid by the insurance company; and that
she was to be careful and see that she obtained her
rights, and that no advantage shouh be taken of her by
the prisoner, with whom she was n a on terms of inti-
macy at the time. The complainant added, that after
this conversation her father became delirous, and that
he remained in that condition until his decease.
The solicitor of the Equitable Insurance Cempanv
attended and produced a deed assigning the amount of
the policy to the prisoner, and it purported to have the
deceased, Mr. Richards's, signature attached to it. He
added that the prisoner had called at the office and pro-
duced the deed in question, laud that the mosey was to
have been paid to him 'on Wednesday last, had not th,
complainant (his sister) calied tilt re in the interim anti
represented that the document was a forgery.
The prisoner denied in the most positive terms that
the deed was a forgery, and said that there were no
grounds for such an eaccusation against him; that it was
true his father left his property equally between him and
his sister, Kith the exception of the policy or insurance,
which Ise made over to him, and executed a deed for the
purpose. He added that he had a person in attendance
who witnessed the execution of the deed, and who would
prove the fact. He then called
John Hammond, who, on being sworn, stated that he
was formerly in the prisoner's employment, and that he
recollected about three or four months ago (he could not
say precisely) being call; d era to witness the deceasee
(lir. Richer:is) execute the deed produced, assigning the
policy of insurance to his soil (04e prisoner), and that
upon that occasion he (witness) read over the document
to the old,gentleman, whom he afterwards saw attach
eis signature to it. The de,4 was shown to the witness.
and he identified it as the same he had witnessed on the
occasion alluded to.
Mr. COTTINGHAM inquired whether the deceased's will
was made previous to the execution of the deed atsign-
ing the policy of insurance to the pritorier? The cam.
plainant replied that the deed purported to have been
executed eight or ten days subsequently to that of
the will.
Mr. COTTINGHAM'Sftid that the case was fraught with
suspicion. The accused, however, had called forward a
witness who was in his employ, and who had sworn that
he saw the deceased attach his signature to the deed.
He (the Magi,trate) would not, therefore, entertain the
charge as alleged against the prison. r, but would advise
!he complainant to utter an action against the prisoner,
and that he had no doubt. it she would indemnify the
insurance company, they would withhold the payment of
the amount of the pollee, to the prisoner until 'the ques-
tion was tried before anether tribunal,
The prisoner e as then di,chereeea

not doing so.
Mr. Sergeant TALFOURD, on behalf of the defendant,
said their .Lordships were often told that a case rested
on :a word; but here• it rested on a letter only. It
was his • duty to contend, both upon principle
-ind precedent, that this was a good ground of
demurrer. The Court had decided that the letter
"I,". being a vowel and capable of pronunciation,
might be taken to• be a Christian name, but they
had at the same time intimated that such 'would not
be the case 'with a consonant, which, as it could not be
sounded alone, would be deemed to be not a name but
an initial letter only. Now in this case "M" was
plainly an initial letter, for it could not be pronounced by
itself. Standing by itself, therefore, it meant nothing.
He was sure a very eminent authoress (Miss Edge-
worth), whose loss they had recently had to lament, was
of opinisn that all the letters of the alphabet, by the
mode in which they were explained, were rendered little
more (to use judicial language) than "a mockery, a de-
lusion, and a snare"—that A B C D, &c., meant A B
C I), &c., and nothing more; but even if it would avail
him, he feared' his friend could not rely upon such
authority.-
The LORD CHIEF JUSTICE—You say the " M" means
nothing—then let it mean nothing. Would a scratch be
letnurrable?
Mr. Sergeant TALFOURD—I say that " M" by itself
cannot be pronounced, and means nething; but here it
toes mean something, which something ought to have
teen- stated-or explained under the statute. Suppose a
person of the name of John Robins, the Court would
surely bold a declaration bad which described him by
the•word John and figures of the redbreast! In like
.manner the Court would hold this declaration bed, be-
cause it either put a sign for one of the defendant's
eamee, or described it by the initial letter. A conso-
eant•by itself was a mere sound withcut meaning. The
letter H, indeed, by the custom of London and some
ether places, was no sound at ail—(Laughter)—though
elsewhere •it protruded itself on all oceasions.—(Re•
newt d laughter.)
Mr. Justice MAULE—I bad a policeman before, me as
a witness the other day, who told me he belonged to the
hen" division, and it was not until some further stage
in the cause that I discovered it was not a division de-
signated by the name of a bird, but by " N," the alpha-
oetical letter.—(Great laughter.)
Mr. Sergeant TALFOURD—It will, probably, be con-
tended tf,at this person might have been christened in
the mant.er the bill is signed, but I submit that the court
will not intend that. It is true, we often hear of absurd
Christian names, and I myself remember when many
persons insisted upon having their children christened
Sir Francis Burdett."
Mr. Justice MAULE.—I remember a very learned and
ingenious argument by Mr. Jardine, when I sat in the
Court of Exchequer, by which he proved to the satisfac-
tion of the court, that the Christian name is the real
name, and the surname is only an addition; that in the
case of John Stiles, for instance, John is the real name,
but Stiles was perhaps originally added only because the
ancestor lived near one.
Mr. Sergeant TALFOURD—Then having, I hope, con-
vinced the Court thut " M " by itself cannot be a name,
tied means nothing-, I submit it -must be understood as
an iritial,• and therefore that it onght to have been so
stated.
Mr. Justice MAllLE—Pleadings are in writing, there-
tore the law presumes that the Court can read and know
its -letters: Vowels may be names, and in " Sully's
Memoirs" a Monsieur D'O. is spoken of ; but consonants
cannot be names alone, as they require in pronounciation
he aid of vowels;
Mr. Sergeant TALFOURD—Yes; but in the case of con-
sonants they are taken to be but initials when used alone
both in law and literature. Throughout the ponderous
volumes of Richardson's novels, fur instance, we find
persons spoken of in this manner. In " Clarissa Har-
'owe," fur instance, " Lord M." is mentioned through-
t;ut four volumes, but it could never be understood that
this was the real name, or anything more than an initial.
Again, an author well known to the Lord Chief Justice
(Charles Lamb) wrote a farce entitled simply " Mr. II."
but the whole turns ueon this being the initial only of a
name he wished to conceal. In his prologue to it, he
humorously says—
" When the dispensers of the public lash
Soft penance give; a letter arid a deal —,
When vice reduced in size shrinks to a fiiling,
And loses half her progress by curtailing),
Faux pas are told in such a modest way,
The atlair of Colonel B— with Mrs. A—,
You must forgive them; for what is there, say,
Which such a pliant Vowel must not vent,
To such a very pressing Consonant?
Or who poetic justice dares dispute,
When mildly.melting at a lover's suit,
The wife's a Liquid, her good man a Yute." •
And he concludes by an appeal to the consequences of
this " mincing fashion," which (said the Learned Ser-
geant) I trust will have great weight with your Lord•
ships, for he adds—
" Oh, should this mincing fashion ever spread
From names of living -heroes to the dead;
How would ambition sigh and hang the head,
As each loved syllable should melt away,
Her Alexander turned into great A,
A single C her Caesar to exptess,
Her Scipio sunk into a Rowan. S
And nick'd and dock'd to those new modes of speech,
Great Hannibal himself to Mr. II—."
The Learned Sergeant then cited anti argued upon a
ariety of cases on his side of the question, and sun
witted that their Lordships ought to decide in favour ti
his client.
Mr. F. ROBINSON, on behalf of the plaintiff, ssid
be did not deny the right of every Englishman to bt:
called by every name given to him at his baptism; bu.
he submitted that before he claimed to be privileged oii
that account, he must show that his privilege has bet it
invaded. Here it was assumed threughout that the
" M." in the name " John M. Knott" was an initia;
letter, but he believed there were instances in which
persons had been christened in this remarkable way in
this country. He was told there was lately a bank di-
rector who was christened " Edmund R, Robinson;"
but were it otherwise in this country, did it follow that
in no other country, Jew, Turk, or heathen might not
use such names? If, however, it were an initial letter,
why did not his friend apply to have the right nuns,
substituted? If it were a misdescription, it was plead-
able in abatement. Such a name might originate front
an error of the clergyman at the chriAening.
The LORD CHIEF JUSTICE—Iii the upper circles of
society it is customary to hand in the name in writing,
which prevents mistake.
Mr. Justice Matrix—The practice of the circles with
which I am conversant was, and I believe is, to give the
name verbally. There was however, a gentlemen, the
sheriff of one of the counties I went through on circuit,
Mr. Jelin Wanly-4- Sawbridge Erle Dtax, whose name
was very probably handed in.—(Laughter.)
Mr. RoßlNSoN—There are messy Scotch and French
names, such as M‘Donald, M‘Teggart, D'Harcourt,
D'Horscy—how are such names to be set out in the
pleadings? Suppose. again, a man's name were the
name of a river, as X ?
Mr. Justice MAULE—BIit that is not spelt 80 ; it is
idem per idem, X for ex. Beer, I believe, is sometimes
called X, but riot water.
Mr. RoßlNSoN—There are some of our names which
are precisely those of letters, as Gee, Jay, Kay, &a.
Mr. Justice MAULS —But here it is not sonans, only
consonans, and cannot bo soanded without other letters.
Mr. ROBINSON—Their Lordships should remember
the existence of a publication called the Fonatic Nuz,
and unless they meant to give a " heavy blow and great
discouragement" to that rising science, he hoped they
• would not decide against his client.—(Laughter.) But
he had seriously to -submit that by demurring to this
declaration the defendant admitted, according to legal
principles, that his name was that which was stated in
the declaration.
Mr. Justice CRES WELL referred to and distinguished
this case from the case of "Roberts v, Moon," in 5 Term
Reports, where a plea in abatement of' misnomer, begin-
ning "sand the said Richard, sued by the name of
Robert, was held bad.
Mr. Justice MAULE suggested that as 65/. los. de•
perded upon the question, it would be better for the
plaintiff to amend.
Mr. Iloneeso-N declined to do so, and contended no
case could be cited directly, in support of the deMurrer,
and therefore the Court should decide in favour of the
plaintiff.
Mr. Sergeant TALFOURD having briefly replied,
The LoRD CHIEF JUSTICE—The various stages in
the argument in this ca-e hive been already discussed
sand decided. The courts have decided that they will
not assume that a consonant letter exprettses a [same,
but they will assume it expresses an initial only ; and
they further decided that the insertion of art initial
letter is ground of demurrer, and is not merely an irre-
gu'arity. In the case of "Nash v. Collier, this Court
decided that a demurrer to. the declaration which des
berihf,d the defendant'e name as William Henry W. Col-
lier was not frivolous, and gave a strong intimation,
which the plaintiff had the good sense 'to attend to,
that he ought to amend his declaration. That decision

FROM THE LONDU.N GAZETTE OI

TUESDAY,
DIVIDENDS.
At the. Court, Basingh,,ll-,treet.
J. Gale, Bruton-titrvet, B rkele)-Square, booksell,r,
Juto. 26, at eleven—M. J. Pyke, lirifr;hton, j.weh.r,
June 27, at halt-past eleven—NV. 13. Brotie and C. G
lirodie, Salisbury. bank,rs, Jo.° 27, at halt pa,,t
-'f. H. Pinder, Southampton, Cheltenham, and Giuu,
eester, tailor and draper, June 26, at one.
In tne Country.

J. D. Abrams, York, tailor aid draper, June 28. a
deven, at the Court, Lveds—W. Chatta, Barton. upon.
(Lumber, Lincolnshire, ironmonger, June 27, at eleven
at the Town-hall, Kingston-upon-Bail.
PAYMENT OF DIVIDENDS.

W. E. Holmes, Lie field, Staffordshire, coachmaker,
55., on Thursday, May 31, or any subsequent Thursday,
between eleven and three, at the office of Mr. Valpy,
Birmingham.
•W. Smith, Uttoxeter, Staffordshire, mercer, 3s. 6d.,
and second dividend 2id., on Thursday, May 31, or any
subsequent Thursday, between eleven end two, at the
office of ar'. Valpy, Birmingham.

T. Edwards, fltirslern, Staffitidshire, earthenware ma-
nufacturer, 4d., any Friday, Ist.tvveen elev. n and three,
at the uffice of Mr. Whitmore, Birmingham.
J. Birch, Kingston-upon-Hull, tailor. second and final
dividend of Bd., with the first of 21. 3d. on new proof's,
on Friday, June 8, or any subsequent Friday, between
eleven and two, ut the office of Mr. Carrick, Hull.
U. Poltnn, Kingston.upon-Hull, corn-merchant, third
and final dividend 'of 1 6-16 d., with the first and second
of 6d. and 9d. on new proofs, on Friday, June 8, or any
subsequent Friday, between eleven and two, ut the office
of Mr. Carrick, Hull.

C. Bertram, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, merchant, 3s. 6d.,
on Saturday, June 2, or any following Saturday, between
t•n and three, at the office of Mr. Wakley, Newcastle-
up)-Tyne..

W. Parkinson, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, merchant,
4s. 4d., on Saturday, June 2, or any following Satur-
day, between ten and three, at the office of Mr. Wakley,
NewcaStle upon-Tyne.
• T. Towerson, Tudholes, Cumberland, miller and lime-
burner, 31. 9d., on Saturday, June 2, or any following
Saturday, between ten and three, at the office of Mr.
Wakley, Newcastle-upon-Tyne.
NOTICES OF CERTIFIOATES.
At the Court, Basinghall-street.
J. Fraser, Brighton, draper, June 27, at eleven—C.
Howard. Kingston, Surrey, and Great Tower-street,
City, wine merchant, June 27, at eleVen—J. H. D
Windmill-street, Haymarket, livery-stable keeper, June
27, at eleven—E. L. Blackman, Gracechuroh-street,
tailor, June 27, at half-past eleven.
_

L. L. Whittle, Bolltonni,hLe:
ench airr grocer, June 26, at
noauye.,
twelve, at the Court, Manchester—J. B. ' Sinhh, Liver-
pool, joiner and builder, June 28, at eleven, at the Court,
Liverpool—R. Carihy, Snifford, carpenter, joiner, and
builder, June 27, at twelve, at the Court, Birmingham.