The Sun.
London, England, 1831-12-16 00:00:00

NOSE COLLEGE

His Honour the MASTER of the ROLLS
this morning in this case, which was an informa'
Attorney-General, as the relation of Lord St
ander Nowell, for the purpose of having th,
tain estates applied to the benefit of Midd
to have a scheme, subject to the approval of ,
regulation of the charity. In the years 1559. an,
jesty Queen Elizabeth, by letters patent, upon
of Alexander Nowell, the then Dean of St. P
grammar school at Middleton, in Lancashire, to
school of Queen Elizabeth,at Middleton. Certain;
for the purpose of supporting the school, and her
a person of the name of Ireland as master; she
under inciter and six poor scholars. The nex
master was by the letters patent given to Noi
death it vested in the principal and scholars of Ki
lege of Brasenose, who were appointed Govern,
The property increasing considerably in value, •
profits being greatly more than was required
the school, the defendants considering that th,
to apply the revenues of the property beyond
to the master and under master as stipulat
patent, had applied the whole of the surpl
of their own College, with the sanction a
under the direction of Alexander Nowell, the
question in the cause was, whether it was the
ander Nowell, the founder, that the property
two letters patent should be held by the Coils
with theparticular payments stated, or whether ii
applied to the other charitable purposes ex
tents. To the mind of his Honour, it appen
that the whole property comprised in both
had been directly or indirectly derived from .
and that Queen Elizabeth was merely th,
carrying his intentions into effect ; and
Alexander Nowell, being the founder of thi
true inquiry being as to his intentions,
guage of the letters patent being favourab,
verse to the intentions to be collected fro•
his Honour did not consider himself justified
usage which had prevailed in the College from
letters patent. The information must there's
but without costs.

VICE-CHANCERY COURT-('

His Honour theVICE-CHANCELLOR was
morning with causes of no public importance,

COURT OF KING'S BENCH.-

HUMPHRIES v. BOYCE.
This was an action to recover SO/. which the
lady, had lent to the defendant's wife. It at
dence of several witnesses that Mr. Boyce,
ferences with his wife separated from her,
living apart from him, the plaintiff lent her t.
151. Some time afterwards Mrs. Boyce died,
applied to the defendant for the 951. He at fi
the 801., alleging that as the plaintiff had not
to show for it he was nct bound to pay it. I
the 15/., and upon several occasions afterwards
the SOI.

On the part of the defendant, his attorney
the 151. to the plaintiff, and received a receipt
ing to her that it would be a bar to any °the]
duced the receipt.
His LORDSHIP was of opinion that the
an action for the 801.—The Jury returned a verdi

COAINION PLEAS.-(TH

The Court was occupied the whole of the n.,
upon a bill of exchange, which had not ter
reporter left the Court.

SPORTING INTELLIG

TATTERSALL' S,

THE DERBY, 18a.2.
9 to 1 agst Lord Exeter's Beiram
11 to 1 agst Mr. Dilly's Margrare
12 to 1 agst Lord Chesterfield's Non
12 to 1 agst Lord Exeter's Dulcinea
16 to 1 agst Mr. Vansittart's Dariolel
20 to 1 agst Duke of Grafton's Pastille
20 to 1 agst Lord Mountcharles's Mir
20 to 1 agst Lord Exeter's Folly colt
20 to 1 agst any other
12 to 1 agst Mr Rtdsdale's lot
500 to 100 agst Beiram Duleinea (tak
OAKS.
7 to 1 agst Mr. Chifney's Erniliana