The Sun.
London, England, 1853-08-09 00:00:00

THE CAB QUESTION.

dtiaoyWnsienacaganom.noorwelicliadiipsisnarosatiicoohnnatitise impatient of argument ;
the
possible cab quteesn-
( From the Morningtdcns
ceChutshsr Chronicle.)
discussion
wcolfa
se .
and neither we nor our readers were then in a position
to take a very cool or deliberate view of our future rela-
t act had been offered to
the cab trade before the strike—that the owners and
drivers struck in spite of this concession, making other
twt
hi oeen
as
llwe
gidtehtdorigour
thegnopo
urwro pwor ifaesttlo
tr seh
raoetfc
eah
nascukbns et
ay
nctai
ar li a
agbal.
mA
el ln that aotf
and preposterous demands, which they did not get—
andpwhciaivars
quitted
nst e
dt
hiring.
.dh
through
that
What
vii .
dot
withoutuhhsgheayhitpt returnedhteoycommittee,shhu aci redee
eib
ad i
no e
ne wcongawo
biron,kf
offered
eax exactly
di
awaits
their
t bplaayyrt
final e
wca
ymCumberland-
gate,. discussiono
fberlan.
s preposterous
theyerwo
ua
88 hadtd
e-
mands. What they struck for, but did get,notpaso
appeal, and a shilling instead of sixpence for the shortest
abate-
ment of the act is now embodied in clauses 13 and 14
of the Hackney Carriage Duties Bill, which, having
in the House of Commons.
We have all along contended that the entire abolition
of back fares constituted a substantial grievance. It
gate, at any hour of the night, for a six miles fare into
the country. To the reasonableness of the relaxation
of the law, as at first propounded by Mr. Fitzroy,
giving a shilling a mile for every mile beyond the first
four, we assented, though aware that it was a double
boon to the cabman, as curtailing the distance and in-
troducing shilling fares. But we were soon convinced
that the clause giving this shilling a mile for every
mile after the first four beyond Charing-cross or Temple-
bar, is an injustice. London is far too large for a
single centre. We neither have, nor ought to have, a
milliariura aureum. The old heart of London was
the Standard at Cornhill ; but this is extinct. If
any place can claim to be the central sun of the Lon-
don nebula, it is the Post-office. But for locomotive
purposes, the metropolis ought to be divided into sepa-
rate departments. Bow is as much within the Lon-
don limits as Brompton ; and so is Upper Holloway.
The streets teem with population the whole way.
A complete London native may find himself in want of
a cab eastward or northward when he is already four
miles from Temple-bar. We see no reason why there
should not be many starting points from which the
compulsory four miles may be taken— e. g., the Angel
at Islington Shoreditch Church-- Aldgate Pump—
London-bridge—Hyde-park Corner—all the railway sta-
tions—King's-cross—and the like. It is the vice of the
Legislature to regard the Houses of Parliament as the
centre, material as well as political, of the British uni-
verse ; and to fix upon either Temple-bar—or, still
worse, as was at first proposed, Charing-cross—is a boon
to the aristocratic West, at the expense of the poorer
and more populous East of London. As to the other
clause, which, when more than two persons are con-
veyed in a cab, gives sixpence for every passenger above
two, whilst the existing act gives only a single sixpence
for any number of passengers alive two—the objection
to it is, that it is perfectly superfluous, and only entails
inconvenience on the hirer, without any gain to the driver.
For example, if it is required to take a family party of five
to a theatre within a mile, it will be actually cheaper
to hire three cabs than one. Three cabs will cost
eighteen-pence—a single cab will cost two shillings.
Again, two cabs, for four persons, will cost one shilling
—one cab, for four persons, will cost eighteen-pence.

Perhaps Mr. Fitzroy has an eye to the pictorial effect of
processions. A family party, settled in a succession of
cabs, will give some grand combinations and novel
street attractions ; and an ordinary Bloomsbury wiree
will afford occupation and amusement to a string of a
hundred vehicles. The change has surely only its own
cumbrousness to recommend it.

From much that we hear, we can only look forward
to a single solid remedy for the present, and perhaps
unavoidable, defects of any legislative measure. The
cab trade still sulkily obstructs, to say the least, the new
act. Their clamours for the appeal are deep, if not loud,
and another srtike is by no means impossible. But mat-
ters have come to that pitch that the very slightest re-
laxation in this direction is impossible. Summary juris-
diction before the police-courts has secured the decency of
the drivers. This single provision is vital. London may at
last take its drives in security—the moral tyranny is at
an end, and for ever. If, however, the cab and omnibus
trade will not submit to this most excellent provision,
we must find those who will. Yet we must remark that,
in the countless difficulties about the number of per-
sons to be carried, the fares, and so forth, an entirely
free trade alone will adjust all hitches. We see
enough of acts of Parliament, present and prospective,
to feel convinced that no measure can be devised
which shall secure entire fairness, and prevent all in-
equalities. Nothing but free trade will do it. We see
no reason why there should not be on the stands cabs of
various qualities and prices. We should hail shilling-a-
mile vehicles complacently as we should welcome four-
pence-a-mile cabs—the one class would be found to
answer just as well as the other. And if the present
cab-owners will not accept a monopoly, with its neces-
sary accompaniment of restrictions, they may depend
upon it that the public will be benefited by the total
abolition of the monopoly.
Meanwhile, a stimulant may be usefully administered
to the parties entrusted with the publication of the
lists of fares. The public are very reasonably com-
plaining of the tardy and inefficient way in which the
provisions of the new Act are carried out. The fares
are not measured. The regulation requiring the fares,
and the number of persons carried, to be painted inside
and outside the carriage, is not complied with. Adequate
supervision as to the character of horses and vehicles is
not exercised. That the act has already done so much
in civilising Cabby, only proves its latent capabilities for
achieving further good. The good telmpe uneranypdrinpeuipbilieaec
spirit with which the inhabitants of
hestphoendminetgroenoelirgys m
inconveniencesreuire an
exercisean
and losses o
its
siree aikpe, require
of officials. And, till the book of fares makes:
appearance,
half the benefits of the improved system
are in complete abeyance.

WESTMINSTER-BRlDGE.—YeSterday the new act, passed
on Thursday, to transfer Westminster-bridge and the
estates to the Commissioners of Public Works and Pub-
lic Buildings, and to enable the commissioners to re-
move the present bridge and to build a new bridge on
or near the same site, was printed. All former acts are
repealed, and the Commissioners of Public Works are
constituted a corporation, for the purposes of this act,
and the former corporation is dissolved. The rent-roll
of the houses belonging to the bridge amount to 7,4061.
ls. 6d. a year. General powers are given to the newly-
appointed commissioners of the bridge, and they are
authorised to construct a new bridge with proper ap-
proaches, according to the plan deposited in their office,
which plan may be inspected on the payment of Is.
There are several clauses to provide against damage
n
the new bridge, and penalties may he enforced. yn
l
the new bridge is completed and thrown open to
__tch:
Public, the commissioners are to keep up a e up'
tion between the Middlesex and Surrey shores.
the
As
sd
Com-
pensation is to be given to the officersot
by reason of the abolition of their offices.
down,
and the
convenient, the old bridge is to be taken soon as
materials sold.
ed on swings banks =-
consolidate and amend the
RS ANNUITIES.—
THE NEW ACT, OR SAVIN: BAN
Yesterday the new act just pa
consolidate
he l at
ht ieo nm te od theum
nuiti( s was printed.
purchase of Government
tomake other provisions in re-
laws, and t ) grant addilttiiosntaol
or savings banks, and
nle
portions of the acts relating to
Annuities,fae ilititehsr oi tin
spect thereof. _o
the National Debt Commissioners
and from that day
such matters are to be repealed on the 10th of October •
nt sir 1 • •
may receive money, from depositors, &c., for the pur-
chase Annuities, ong eor joint con-
of Government
tinuance of two lives, to any amount not less than 41.,
nlr more than 30/., for the benefit of any one person,
and to receive payment for Immediate Life Annuities in
one sum, or for Deferred Life Annuities, either in one
sum or in annual sums, payable for fixed periods. No
such annuities are to be granted to or for the benefit of
any person under the age of ten years.
THE CHAMPIONSHIP OF THE THAMES.—As Mr. Pea-
cock the late holder of the champion sculls, is not in a
condition to row, there will be no race on Wednesday
for the championship, Mr. James Payne becoming the
, holder.
FULHAM REGATTA.—The Fulham regatta was rowed
yesterday, but was chequered by a variety of misadven-
tures, none of which, however, were of a serious nature.
After rowing three heats John Phelps was declared the
winner, Kelly being second,