The Sun.
London, England, 1853-03-09 00:00:00

urged upon the trustees of the National Gallery an object
which appeared to him not difficult of accomplishment,—
the obtaining a collection of the early Italian masters, not
so much, perhaps, on account of their intrinsic beauty, as
for the great aid they would afford us in the tracing the
progres.s of painting. (Hear, hear.) He certainly antici-
pated very valuable results from the labours, of :930 com-
mittee, and he should therefore give the proposition his
warmest support. (Hear.)
Mr. J. BELL hoped that the Government .would not
sanction the locality of the Great Exhibition as-the site of
the new National Gallery, considering that the most com-
petent authorities—Mr. Uwins, Mr. Faraday, Sir C. East-
lake—had protested against that locality as calculated to
damage the paintings.
Mr. HUME doubted whether there were not too many
subjects of inquiry assigned to the committee. As to the
cleaning process, he had, years ago, called the attention of
the house to the subject, and from the inquiries instituted,
at his instance, by Sir Robert Peel, it appeared that this
cleaning had been ordered on the authority of one indi-
vidual, the general body of the trustees knowing nothing
about the matter. The whole history of the defective
management of the National Gallery was, in fact, simply
this, that the trusteeship, nominally vested in a great number
of persons, was actually in the hands of one trustees, who
did just what he pleased with the pictures. While large sums
were annually given to the National Gallery, not one single
regulation had been issued by the Treasury for the guidance
of the persons—person rather—who administered those
sums. How was it to be expected, he would ask, that the
First Lord of the Treasury, or the Chancellor of the Ex-
chequer, or Lord Lansdowne, could give their personal
superintendence ? No. There was a whole string of trus-
tees—Lord Ashburton, Lord Overstone, Mr. W. Russell,
Mr. S. Rogers, and so on, whom nobody supposed would
attend, for one reason or another, until you came down to
Sir C. Eastlake, who was himself, and solely, the com-
mittee. He noticed in the minutes mention of a number
of pictures, by good masters, offered to the gallery, and
rejected by the trustees. He should like to'know why
they had been rejected. (Hear, hear.) If it was on account
of want of room, the room should have been supplied. As
to the question of an aggregate collection, it appeared to
him that the public had better opportunities of seeing works
of art when they were distributed in several collections.
Most certainly he should prefer that the collection at
Hampton-court should remain where it was • nor did he see
why, after expending more than 1,000,0001. in rendering
the British Museum a fit receptacle for great monu-
ments of sculptured art, those monuments should be
carried off somewhere else. Rather than have the
National Gallery removed, he would prefer that the
barracks, or workhouse, at the rear should be purchased
and added to it. He entirely concurred in the motion
for inquiry, because every inquiry of this nature
was attended with advantage. A proper building once
secured and placed under efficient management, the cost to
the public Treasury need not be a single farthing, because
he was convinced that the contributions of works of 'art
from the public would be ample.
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said that,
between those gentlemen who thought that the motion of
his hon. friend the member for Renfrewshire included too
much, and those who thought that it included too little,
there was ample room for a comfortable belief that the
motion was very judiciously framed ; and he, for one, was
glad to see it in the hands of his hon. friend. (Hear.)
There were, however, two subjects on which he wished to
make a remark. First, with regard to the question of the
removal of the National Gallery. It appeared to be sup-
posed that the Government had absolutely decided on that
removal, and were pledged to its taking effect. So far as
he was informed, no such decision had been arrived at ;
and nothing had been done which, in the event of an ex-
pression of public opinion on the subject (and he thought
it was a, matter in which the public were deeply interested)
or in the event e,f its being found, on the whole, desirable
that it should remain where it was, rendered its removal
necessary. One word also with respect to cleaning the
pictures, because strong opinions had been expressed upon
that subject. The gentlemen who had been officially
employed in this matter might have been right or
might have been wrong in what they had done ; but they
were 'public servants of a very high character, and he -was
sure it was not the wish of the house to prejudge anything
they had done in the performance of their duties. (Hear,
hear.) The public were much obliged, he thought, to those
who called attention to anything which affected the custody
of these very precious treasures. At the same time it should
be known that what had been done had not been hastily
undertaken, but had been executed by Mr. Seguier, a gen-
tleman of great experience, under the close and constant,
superintendence of Mr. Uwins. He held in his hand a cora-
l:l:tunic:Alen from Mr. Seguier on this subject, in which he
said--" I assure you, that during my very extensive prac-
tice, I do not recollect to have had any pictures improved
ino'm to my satisfaction." He only mentioned this, not to
ineuice the house to subscribe to the opinions of Mr. Se-
grder, but, as the matter was about, to undergo a close and
ntelligent investigation before a committee, to leave it in
he hands of the committee, "He: -hr ) _

sue commik ( lax, near.,
Mr. LOCKE was glad to hear that the Government' had
not come to any decision with respect to the very im-
portant steps mentioned in the report of the Royal (tom-
missioners, for he thought that the propositions contained
n that report was hardly creditable to the high names
appended to it.
The motion was then agreed to. -
LAW OF PIi3OBATES.

Mr. HADFIELD, having presented a petition in its
favour from the London and North-Western Railway Corn-
any, moved for leave to introduce a bill to prevent the
ecessity of obtaining several probates of the same will, and
everal grants of administration in respect of the estate and
effects of any deceased person ; and to make certain amend-
ments in the law of evidence in respect to the proof of
wills, and of probates and grants of administration. He
bserved that the bill was exceedingly short, that it mule
ne probate and grant of administration sufficient, and
nacted that a probate should be proof of the devise of a
real estate in the same manner as it was of a personal
estate. He could have wished that this should have been

eluded in one general measure ; still, the subject was of
S pressing and important a nature, that he felt justified in
introducing it per se; and he had the sanction of the Soli-
citor-General for saying that he had no objection to the
bringing in of the bill. (Hear, hear.)
Mr. W. BROWN seconded the motion.

Mr. R. J. PHILLIMORE recognised the importance of
the proposed measure, as calculated to put an end to a sys-
tem which cried aloud for amendment, and which no person
could wish to see continued. He remembered a case in
which, for one and the same instrument, it was necessary to
have a probate in Canterbury, another in York, letters of
administration from Scotland, and a certified copy of the
w ill from the colonies. It was perfectly clear that it was
a monstrous state of the law which required such a multi-
plicity of documents when one probate would be ample.
Ho thought, however, that this should form part of the
great measure of reform to be introduced by the Solicitor-.
General, and that the Government would be very ill-advised
if they allowed the present session to pass without achiev-
ing the reform which the Solicitor-General had proMised,
a reform which, however surrounded with difficulties, was
not impossible. Ho trusted that they would do their ut-
most to deal with the subject as a whole, and to place the
testamentary law of this country upon such a footing as
would be consonant with the wishes of the people, and con-
sistent with the due administration of justice.
Mr. COWAN also supported the measure, and expressed
a hope that it would be extended to Scotland.
Leave was then given to introduce the bill, and ft was
afterwards brought up and read a first time.

TAVISTOCK ELECTION.
The SPEAKER announced that he had received ailetter
from the agents of the petitioners in this case ageing Mr.
R. J. Phillimore, stating that it was not their intention to
proceed with the same. •
LEOMINSTER ELECTION.
The SPEAKER also announced that he had received a
letter from the agents to the petitioners in this case,intimat-
ing that they did not intend to proceed with the same
against Mr. J. G. Phillimore.
LIFE ASSURANCE.

Mr. WILSON said, in rising to propose the appoint-
ment of a select committee for the purpose of inquiring
into the subject of assurance associations, ho thought it de-
sirable to give a general outline of the views of the Ctvern-
ment in making that motion. It was impossible forth house
to approach a subject which contained within it princ: plea of
greater difficulty, or principles on which more diversity of opi-
nion naturally existed, than that which involved the in-
terference of Government in trading operations. It was
impossible to look at these associations in one point If view
without regarding them in the light of trading assochations.
It might be properly said on the one side, as long as the
principle of public and open competition was relied on,
Government interference in any way whatever : would
rather inflict injury than benefit on the public. On the
other hand, it might be as fairly contended, with !regard
to associations of this description, which came to the
house and asked for peculiar privileges, that it was the
bounden duty of the house to accompany the giant of
those privileges with such securities as should give the
public security that thoie privileges were properly
used for the public advantage. Between thoee two
conflicting opinions, on which he . admittedl much
'night be said on both sides, it was not his
'intention to
offer any opinion. But he thought the house would agree
thatile if they were to interfere, and if they had interfered,
as they ought to see that such interference, while it impeded
co_ little as possible the objects of private trade, honestly
rein,.e rred the security which it professed to give. With
bgamsltic, these associations, he would particularly guard
one classrZ being supposed to be the advocate either of the
a con,____o the other. He was well aware there was
offices","antLettetween the two classes—the old proprietary
tual Principle:. new offices, established generally en mu-
would understand particularly requested that the house
and that the fle, that he had no object whatever,
vancing the interests of could have no object' in ad-
terests of the other. of one class in preference to the in-
privileges given by act °
of Parliament
object was to see that the
abused that the public acts
Parliament were not so far
were in a condition of inse-
curity against which they ought to be protected by that
house. The enormous
which these associa-
tionsanneseti,:Zzunt of capital now
had grown, and the immense
invested in the hands of the
was,
s-were not, perhaps,
generally understood. The house
, their
pared to hear that in Scotland alone the liPabritars, not pre-
t es of fifteen
insurance companies were 33,000,0001.
tal 6,000,0001., and. their annual income abort" coantil
The house would, also, perhaps, be astonishedaetmoo'hue_a!'e-t—ha.t.
in England the capital of these associations
150,000,0001, sterling at the smallest estimate---o,eaur: a
and that the gross annual income of those offices, received
from the most deserving classes of society, was not less
than 5,000,0001. sterling, equal almost to the entire amount
of the income tax. (Hear, hear.) When they heard
that thousands of these associations were springing up
ono day, and falling
.like an autumn leaf the next, he
thought the house would hardly be prepared to go Na with-
out taking the means to place them on a more satisfactory
btleis. One of the earliest things to which the attention
of the present Government was directed, was the abuse
which existed among these institutions, and they felt that,
inasmuch as they wire formed under acts of Parliament,
Parliament wan by implication responsible for any evil
consequences which might result. He supposed every in-
dividual would agree with him, and few out of the house
would,. question the vast utility of these associations. There
Vero 111) institutions of greater importance in a social point
of view, calculated as they were to win people to provi-
dent habits ; and, in proportion to their importance, the
legislature ought to place them on such a footing as would
_nlaluce the public to use them to the greatest possible ex-
t. (iflear, hear.) Not only were they of utility as a
capital° yr7ision, but as a means of accumulating the
rtptah country in large sums, and capable of being
ass,V°
ere rposes to which banking deposits and banking
was to
~a notapplicable. The capital of insurances offices
ix,ligerToLtis
ttau,rie that it could be invested for much
he believed in thalt that
of
a banking establishment ; and
from largo suing be aspect the public derived a benefit
ing accumulated in their hands. As an