The Sun.
London, England, 1853-04-14 00:00:00

LON DOiN, 'THURSDAY EVENING, APRIL 14, 1853.

NEW QUARTERLY REVIEW. No. VI.
Price Ilalf-a• crown.
A Second Edition Is now ready, and may be had of all booksellers.

llookharn and Sons, 15, Old Bond-street.

SOCIETY for IRISH- CHURCH MISSIONS
TO TUB 1.0:11AN CATHOLICS.

ANNUAL MEETING.

The Annual Meeting of this Society will (D.V.) be held in Exeter
Hall, on Friday, the 29;h of April, 1853.
The Chair will be taken at 11 o'clock A.at , by
His Grace the Duke of MANCEIFSTER, President.
The Right non. Joseph Napier, M.P., Arthur Mills, Esq., M.P.,
John C. Ctlquhoun, Esq„ Rev. Alex. R. C. Dail: s, M.A., Rev. Robt.
Blekerstetb, M.A., Hon. Fecretaries, Rev. Charles F. Macarthy,
M.A., Ex.-Sch. T.C.D., Missionary, and ethers, have engaged to
take part in the proceedings. - .

SERIIONS.

Sermons will (D.V.) be preached in aid of the Funds of the Society

as follows :

On Friday Morning, April 15th, in St. Michael's Church Chester-
square, by the Rey. William Harrison, Rector of Birch, at 11
o'clock.
On Sunday Morning. April 24th, in St. Giles in the Fields, by the
Rey. William Weill, 8.A., Deputation-Secretary, at 11 o'clock.
And in the Evening, by the Rev. Robert Bickersteth, M.A., rector,
at 7 o'clock
On Friday Evening, April 29111, in Pe-cy Chapel, Charlotte street,
Fitzroy-square, by the Rev. Edward Ellis, Corresponding Missionary,
at 7 o'clock.
On Sunday Morning, May Ist, in St. Matthew's Denmark-hill, by
the Rev. Edward Ellis, Corresponding Mis3ionary, at 11 o'clock.
On Wednesday Evening, May 4th, in St. Mary's Parish Church,
Islington, by the Rev. John C. Miller, M.A , Rector of St. Martin's,
Birmingham, at 7 o'clock.
:end on the same Evening, in St. Michael's, Stockwell, by the
Rev. Edward Ellis, Corresponding Missionary, at 7 o'clock.
On Asc2nriion Day, May sth, in 'trinity Church, Marylebone, by
the Rev. II gh Mt IsTeile,.D.D., of Liverpool, at 11 o'clock.
And on the evening of May sth, in Christ Church, Newgate•street,
by the Rev. Robert Bickcr,teth, M.A., Rector of St. Giles, at half-
past 6 o'clock.
On Sunday morniner, May Bth, in Regent-squara Church, Regent-
square, by the Rev. Edward Ellis, Corr,!sponding Missionary, at 11
o'clock. In the afternoon, by the Rev. Ed Yard Ellis, at half.past 3
o'clock ; and in the evening, by the Rev. G. A. Roger', M A., In-
cumbent, at 7 o'clock.
On Wednts'ay evening, May 1 I th, in Portman Chapel, Baker-
s• rent, Portman. square, by the Rev. J. C. Ityle, 8.A.., Rector of Hel-
mingham, at 7 o'clock.
On Sunday monthly.' May 22d, in the Lock Chapel, Harrow-road,
by the Lord Bishop of Cashel, D.D., at 11 o'clock.

MEDICAL ADVICE ON THE SECRET INFIRMITIES OF
YOUTH AND MATURITY.

DR. SAMUEL LA"i4III.T,ii,RkIWORD-SiillAßE, LONDON,
Doctor of Medicine, and Matric dated Member of the University of
Edinburgh, Honorary Member of the London Hospital Medic
Society, Licentiate of Apothecaries' Hall, London, &c., &c.
VIAY be consulted, personally, or by letter, on
the various disorders of the nervous and generative system,
resulting from juvenile irregu slinks and excesses, which have pro-
duced more misery in youth, degradation in manhood, and prema-
ture decay at all stages of life, than perhaps any other class of dis-
eases known to modern pathologists. Long and practical experience
in the treatment of these diseases has proved that there arc in exist-
ence secret causes of self-acquired miseries and disappointed hopes in
existence, traceable to certain pernicious habits, to which Nervous
Debility, various terms of Insanity, Unhappy and Unfruitful Marri-
ages, Impotency, Local and Constitutional Weakness, and their
endless modifications owe their almost entire origin.
It is absolutely necessary that all men should know that there are
principles of personal management which cannot be violated without
incurring grievous penalties, and when wisdom and regret succeed
the heyday of inconsiderate self-indulgence, how these penalties
may be mitigated, how the sting of their bitterness may be remove !,
and how the evil and its con equences may be avoided, and above all.
that there is scarcely any degree of physical infirmity or functional
derangement to which the timely aid of science cannot apply a cure.
DOCTOR LA'MERT has for a long series of years been engaged
in an extensive practice in the treatment of these delicate com-
plaints, and s the only legally qualified Fhyslclan who, regardless
of the taunts and envy of the hypocritical and mock-modest, has had
the confidence, through the medium of the public press, to direct
attention to these enormous evils; from which no grade of society is
tree. In selecting this department of practice, ho has been ampb
rev arded by the great success that has attended his efforts in the
treatment of these cases, which are too generally confided to the
care of unqualified and ignorant empirics, who, with their pirated
publications, assumed foreign names and titles, and pretended virtues
of their patent nostrums, have inflicted serloes jury on those who
have been induced to place faith in their pretensions.
At home for consultation daily from. Eleven till Two, and from
Six till Eight. All letters must contain the fee of It, and advice ant'
medicines can be forwarded to any Millais or address.
It 13 desirele thrt patients wishing to consult Dr. LI'MERI
should first obtain a copy of his work on

FRENCH JOLTRNALISJI.

THE SALE OF THE CONSIITUTIONSEL.

casec Thisvilconsists
Tribunal.o nissets, Nro•
ac
Thn
he court
otoenudrbtgroat
shi
tenitvbewryedsmet
d, wotao: Saturday,
after sundry adjournments, brought on before the Paris
f
y me xpeee ssa.n d T3hle.
Onesippo Aguado, shareholders in the Constitutionnel,
against M. Veron and M. Mires, for the purpose of having
the sale of that journal made by the former to the latter
declared null, and of an action brought by M. Adamole
and M. Foucalt, also shareholders, against M. Veron alone,
for the purpose of obtaining a division among all the share-
holders of 1,900,000 f., the total sum paid by M. Mires, in-
stead of 720,000 f., which alone bad been divided among
them. To both these actions M. Veron raised the prelimi-
nary objection that the Tribunal had no jurisdiction, but
that they ought to be sent before arbitrators.
M. Paillet appeared for M. Veron. He commenced by
saying that M. Veron ardently desired that the case should
be publicly heard, but that the nature of it, and regard for
the interests of others, required him to demand that it
should be sent before arbitrators, and be gone into with
closed doors. He then proceeded to describe the situation
of the Constitutionnel. That journal, he said, was in 1844
purchased by M. Veron and 14 other persons for 432,500 f.,
and they formed a new company for carrying it on. The
number of shgres was fixed at 180, and the value of each at
3,000 f. The shares were divided among the persons in pro-
portion to their interest in the old company. M. Veron was
appointed sole manager (gerant) and absolute master of the
journal. He alone had power to trace the political lino it
should follow, to choose the personnel, and to modify the form
and price. The further power was given to him of making
over any portion of his authority to any shareholder he might
select. But, on the other; hand, he was, in certain eases,
renderederesponsible for
200,030 f., and was to be e holder of at least 13 shares.
rassdi -o.4rsto Aho amount of
To cover these losses, M. V (iron was entitled to take half
the profits, and when there were no losses his share in the
profits was to be one-third. A committee of 7 sharehold-
ers was to watch over the interests of the journal, and the
by-laws enacted that general assemblies of the shareholders
should be invested with the power of making decisions
which should be binding on all the other shareholders,
though absent ; also, that any dispute which might arise
with respect to the company, or to the liquidation of it,
should be judged by three arbitrators nominated by the
' parties, or, in default of their doing so in a week, by the
Tribunal of Commerce. The Constitutionnel, thus consti-
tuted, had different vicissitudes of fortune. In 1847 there
was a loss of 290,000 f., and M. -Wren took it on himself.
He might then, by the statutes, have resigned the man-
agement, but he did not do so ; and before 1850 he had re-
covered the loss. From 1850 to 1852 his position became
further removed. On the 31st of January, 1852, the Com-
mittee of Surveillance, in their report to the shareholders,
stated that they were greatly indebted to him for his ser-
vices, and that his accounts were admirably kept. In 1847
M. Veron sold M. de Moray, for 100,000 f., the half of his
part in the management of the journal, and this fact was
of importance in the events which followed. In 1852 the
fortune of the Constitutionnel changed ; the paper had to
submit to severe financial and political trials. The Moni-
teur reduced its price from 120 f. to 40f. a year, and this
formed a disastrous competition for the Constitutionnel,
both financially and politically. And this was not all ; the
Pays, which was on the same side in politics, also reduced
its price to 401. To these causes of ruin another was
added. The Constitutionnel published an article on Bel-
gium, which created a profound sensation in the diplo-
matic circles and among the public. Called on for ex-
planations, it stated that it had derived its inspiration
from the highest sources. The new legislation on the press
armed the Government with immense power over the jour-
nals, and in virtue of it a " warning" .was given to the
Constitutionnel. It persisted in its statement, and a second
otholathiutnmgigohotahtahvreebaede,n
assaiidt
moment, not y the
t‘'
vh‘
awastal rthebi nl
eag i
nswt eabns
ecg ies
nvo
pef np
he
seAs a journal After
t any
Chief of the State, but by one of the Ministers.b Its
shares consequently were almost without value. It there-
upon became necessary that something should be done,
and on the 19th of August M. Wren convoked the share-
holders, and exposed to them the real state of the enter-
prise. He represented that it would be impossible to sup-
port the competition of the Moniteur and the Pays by
adopting the same price as they had done, and he proposed
a reduction to 32f. That was a bold and able measure—it
was a coup d'etat. At that price a large increase of sub-
scribers was to be expected. 10,000 subscribers had been
lookedof wouldt3 ne oo
moren(
0 doubt
unbtt los
comeloft
pin r
et
eh backeo
fac course ua snn
newspaper
whilesfpaa p shorte rin
ta hntayi
nmotet
the
eea
rne t
whoa lhi
te
yy
dt
hneor
ed owuabs t
ab
loss o botna ienneedh. s
üßb us
ot
iub no
rf o. r tHu
onNavtoevl ye r ta to ho
na t
price-
w the
o
siderable increase of revenue was to be expected from the
e
tp
twillttoto
nadopt
fyooru
the sellb y
pttal
comiaaov
nasoecgentmoh,
ain:npidedaetnPntnfsiear:ume7tiao,enhe competition increase of publicity. The reduction of the price to 32i%
was of no importance to the Moniteur, the Government
organ, but it was a terrible blow to the Pays. The conse-
quence ;was that the proprietor of the latter journal was
obliged to endeavour to come to an understanding with
the Constitutions/tie. 31. Mires accordingly went to M.
-Toren, and the latter gave this account of the interview
in a essltneire which he had published :—" M. Mires,'
said I distinctly, almost before allowing him to sit
down,sc nbss
ce
subscription
enemies.
.11;43.
sioftcra:nln tay iechihnsieneohll atisameConstitution-
net
wlihe
evheic heavyas
acbylarVbneAri
burden
rho. are
eei stn irtonem,
ntaelcekeaat;di
came
bu sgoeuf
a ydoeluighafdecle,t;naintisvweerreepal7 :TToh-emPorray
`To-morrow,
etni
cannot
. '4 frrs.
, is
n
s
ell
you the Pays, and I cannot even put an end to the compe-
tition in cheapness with the Constitutionnel.'' Surprised,
I asked him the explanation of the enigma. Be calm,'
said he, I have not concluded—listen to me to the end.
I-cannot sell you the Pays, but I can purchase the Consti-
tutionnel from you.' The Constitutionnel,' I answered,
`is not exclusively my property, and you will never be
able to buy it. The proprietorship of the Constitutionnel
is divided into two distinct parts ; the comnzandite and the
gerance ; the commandite consists of 180 shares, and the
gerance is divided into two parts, represented by the
Count de Morny and myself, M. de Moray having pur-
chased from me for 100,000 f. the half of all the rights and '
all the powers which the bye-laws confer on me as gerant. ,
I cannot do anything as gerant without the approbation of
31. de Moray, nor can ho do anything without me. But,' •
I added, ' what would become of me without the Constitu-
tionnel ? I like work, anxiety, and embarrassment. It is
only at rare intervals that I complain of embarrassment.
If I leave Paris and my affairs, at the end of 24 hours I feel
the want of occupation, and gladly resume my harness. I
will be no obstacle to you in any respect, 31. Mires, but
my desire is that you shall not remove me from the Consti-
tutionnel, even on condition of paying me a million.' 31.
Mires, however, insisted, and I then told him that I hed
first
step he had to take was to see Count de Moray. adde
that it would not be becoming in me to estimate the price
which M. de Morny would require for his share in the
management, the greatest reserve on such a point being •
necessary. M. Mires, as an active, enterprising man, said
at once—' I will see you again to-morrow, and I will now :
go to M. de Moray.' The next day lie arrived triumphant.
Everything is concluded with M. de Moray,' said he; `for
his half of the gerance I am to give him 500,000 f. It will
thus be seen that, without any intervention of mine, with-
out my saying a word, the value of the sgrance of the Con-
stitutionnel was fixed. I had no observation to make, but,
more surprised than satified, I said to 31. Mires—' You
are not at the end of your difficulties. You must come to
an understanding with the shareholders, who are repre-
sented by the Committee of Surveillance. Shall I ask the
committee to receive you?" I prefer,' said he, ' that you
shall communicate to them my propositions. The COiltnialt-
dite of the Constitutionnel consists of 180 shares ; those
shares cost only 2,500 f., though they were issued at the
nominal capital of 3,000 f.; 180 times 3,0001. make 540,000 f.,
—propose, in my name, 510,0001. for the shares.' I :re-
marked that 3,000 f. per share would perhaps be considered
too little; that the Committee of Surveillance was suspi-
cious and exacting, and that it had already brought,an
action against me. Thereupon M. Mires, without hesita-
tion, said, offer:them 4,0.00 f., and that will make 720,0001.,
although I know well that no share could now be sold even
for 1,0001." The memoirs then went on to state, that M.
Veron, after again representing to tho committee tho
situation • of tho journal, and the impossibility of con-
tinuing, without enormous losses, the competition with the
Pays and the Moniteur, which had been commenced, com-
municated to them the proposition of M. Mires. Although
(the learned gentleman remarked) the shareholders had no
concern with the terms on which he might treat respecting
the Oytrice, M. Veron told the committee that he also
should leave the Constitutionnel in the event of their selling
it to 31. Mires. The committee received the overtures !
favourably, and when they were communicated to the I
shareholders, the holders of 171 shares out of the 180 con-
sented to accept them. No general assembly of the share- I
holders was, however, called, as the formalities necessitated
by such a meeting would have caused a delay of three
months. Of the nine shares which did not figure in tho I
list of adhesions, three belonged to 31.
I)bYrit impercep-
01ri.ioNtr,e1w.ohno,
and,Nvas
then in Egypt, and six to the famil
y-. Aguado. Tho con-
would snake no
sent ei
bn
the
oepfas Ahr Ita.l.oeofa ttlnhi
of
ir
efoswassri
t.
scu.onnAes,gi (hal eeardetochl
ocfune
grr
iitilaitsenttih e y
objection. The negotiation then might be considered as
nearly concluded ; the question of the gerance arose be-
tween 31. -Wren and M. Mires. " Have you come to an
understanding with 31. de Moray ?" said M. Veron. " I
have," answered M. 31ires : " I am to give him 500,000 f.
for his half of the management." " Well, answered M.
Veron, "I do not seek for other conditions than those M.
de Morny has accepted. But I must remark that he is only
nominally gerant, while I am really so—that I have the
responsibility,
,0001. a-year for expenses of representation,
I have the power. On this account I
am
and I shall lose them. Moreover, I am a writer. I am not
obliged to give my articles for nothing to the Constitutionnel;
and I can prove from the books that, out of the 180,009 f.
allowed annually for the literary expenses of the journal, I
M. Mires, who treated the affair grandly, as
receive 10,000 f. It is, then, 22,000 f. a-year which I shall
have to lose."
a man accustomed to important operations, said, " What
arrangement was come to
,
you say is perfectly just. I offer you therefore 180,000 f. as
an indemnity on that score.n
on the basis thus fixed by M. Mires himself. As to the
shareholders, they were delighted; and a formal deed of sale
was signed on the 17th of November. The fact, of the sale was
announced very ostentatiously, and more than once, in the
Constitutionnel ; so that there was no secrecy, and, if any of
the shareholders had entertained objections, that was the
and 31. Veron was paid. The sale,
But, on the 29th of January,
moment to have made them. The shareholders were paid,
M.
had done so was a problem which M. Veron could not solve.
185
It could not be on account of money, as they had not
in s3lll,eoirv3ltlos sr\ r sva ay.s Awegaousmappdaloietpti complete.
in an opposition to it. Why they
deigned to receive the dividends due to them from the
Constitutionnel, and several thousand francs were now
standing to their credit in the books. They reproached •
M. Wren with having exceeded his powers as a gerant,
should be annulled, and that 65,500 f. should be paid them,
and they accordingly demanded that the sale of the paper
as the price of a share in the first company of the Consti-
tutionnel. As to 31. Adamole, who held four shares, and
31. Foucalt, who held two, they did not demand the nul-
lity of the sale, for they had consented to it ; bat they re-
quired that the 1,180,000 f. paid for the gerance should-be
divided among all the shareholders. These two preten-
sions were contradictory., and he should be able to show,
when the case was gone into on its merits, that they wore

of no weight. But, for the moment, the sole question
was, as to whether the Tribunal could entertain the case.
He repeated his former observation, that if M. Veron could
gratify his own wishes, he would not object to its jurisdic-
tion in the matter. But he was obliged to object on legal
grounds, as, in the event of a decision being given against
him, he would have to proceed against M. de Morny and
M. Mires ; and they might reproach him with having con-
sented to have the case tried by an incompetent tribunal.
Article_ 51 of the'Code de Commerce was very clear in say-
ing that this was one of the cases which ought to be sent
before arbitrators ; and a clause in the bye-laws of the
company of the Constitutionnel said the same thing. The
question in dispute was essentially one between partners,
and it ought to be treated in the same way as all such
questions were. It was, too, a mere commercial one, being
relative to a sale and purchase • and on that ground also
it ought to be sent before arbitrators, or at least before
the Tribunal of Commerce.

M. Chaix d'Est-Ange, advocate for M. Mires, said that
he was anxious to explain that that gentleman had not, as
might be assumed from what had ben said, made a bad
operation in purchasing the Constitutionnel at the rate of
4,000 f. a share, with 500,000 f. to M. de Morny, and
680,000 f. to M. Veron. He had not made a bad bargain,
because he knew that ho could get rid of the two " warn-
ings " that had been given to the journal ; that he could
raise, not only its subscription, but that of the Pays, and
so check the ruin with which it was menaced at 32f.; and
that, as it had 44,000 subscribers, there was reason to hope
that he could increase the number of advertisements,
which had been done. As to the technical objection which
had been raised, he supported it; but it was not necessary
to acid anything to the argument of M. Paillet.
M. Hobert then proceeded to address the court for
Messrs. Aguaclo. He would not, he said, stop to inquire if
the 'other side were, as My alleged, rather anxious than
otherwise that the ,LoCcht be gone publicly- into ; but
he believed that they knew perfectly well that the tribunal
was fully competent to entertain it, though they had pleaded
the contrary. It was necessary to go a little into the acts,
to enable the Tribunal to judge of the question raised.
According to his adversaries, what 31. 'Peron had done was
the simplest thing in the world—he had acted for the com-
mon interest, and it was ingratitudenot to heap eulogiums
upon him. But when he was told that he had not the
right to sell a common property, he replied that the ques-
tion was one between partners, and as such ought to be
discussed in the dark before a tribunal of arbitrators. His
clients saw the matter in quite a different light. They
considered themselves co-proprietors of an accredited news-
paper, represented by a man who was not only the manager
of it, and of the common interests, but, as he had stated
in his ms7noire, the guardian of the portion of the pro-
perty belonging to them, for which their father had paid
65,000 f. Well, that gerant, that guardian, had, with-
out even consulting them, sold and delivered the com-
mon property for 1,900:000f. ; and out of that sum
he had given to a friend 500,000 f., and had kept
680,000 f. himself. Besides that, he and his friend had
taken 174,0001. for shares held by them ; so that there
only remained 546,000 f. to divide among the other share-
holders. The portion which fell to Messrs. Aguado in that
sum was not more than 24,000 f., and that for shares which
had originally cost 65,5001. Tey accordingly contended,
that a sale of property which produced such,results ought
to be annulled ; and he submitted that the tribunal was
the sole judge in matters relative to property. The learned
advocate then went on to remark that it was strange that
M. Wren, who, in the menwire he had published, had in-
troduced a great many irrelevant matters—one of them an
account of a visit ho had made to one of the Messrs. Aguado,
respecting his examination for the degree of bachelor of
letters—had not attempted to prove that he could legiti-
mately dispose of the property in question ; nor attempted
to explain how it happened that, when he had only 31
shares out of 180, he should receive 680,000 f. out of the
purchase-money of 1,930,000 f., and should give 500,000 f. to
a friend for what by his own avowal had cost that friend
only 103,0031. Was not he warranted in saying, in presence
of such figures, that it was not a sale which M. Wren had
effected, but a confiscation ? The learned gentleman then
gave a history of M. Veron's connexion with the Aguado
family. It had commenced by the late M. Agnado, the
father of his clients, having advanced him 300,000 f. for the
caution-money which he had had to deposit as director of
the Opera, and in return for that M. Veron had allowed
him a box gratis. Subsequently, in 1838, M. Veron wrote
a modest letter to M. Aguado, to ask him to assist him in
purchasing two shares in the Constitutionnel. M. Aguaclo
gave 65,500 f. for one of them, but allowed it to stand
in M. Veron's name. In the changes which subse-
quently took place the share was represented by new
ones, bearing M. Aguado's name. In consequence of
these changes, M. "Wren became entrusted with the sole
management f and control over the journal ; but his powers
were not so extensive as had been represented. Thus, they
were limited with respect to all that concerned the pro-
perty, the capital, and the common interest of the share-
holders • anti his' administration was placed under a Com-
mittee Of Surveillance, which committee shared with him
the right of convoking general assemblies of shareholders.
This being so, it was impossible that he could have the right
to sell the journal without the authorisation of a general
assembly of the shareholders ; at all events, it was im-
possible that out of the price of sale he could justly take
580,000 f. for himself ; give 500,000 f. to M. de Morny, and
reserve only 24,0001. for Messrs. Aguado. The learned
advocate then went on to contend that M. Veron, in order
to wring from the Committee of Surveillance its consent to
the sale, had represented the situation of the journal as
much more grave than it really was, and had spoken of the
two " warnings" it had received as likely to be perfectly
ruinous to it,
.though he knew that they were without
danger, as the articles which had called for them had been
written by M. Granier de Cassagnac, and that gentleman
was to remain attached to the journal under its new pro-
prietors ; also, that ho know the " warnings" were to bo
revoked on the establishment of the Empire, which was
near at hand. There was no necessity, he asserted, for the
reduction of the price to 32f., as the Pays was not a very
formidable rival, and as the Constitutionnel then had up-
wards of 40,000 subscribers, while the. Pays had only
10,000. Nor was it true, as had been stated, that the
shares of that paper were at that time unsaleable, as M.
Faucher had sold several for 4.000 f. each. All those facts
caused several of the shareholders to make a formal pro-
test against the sale of the journal on the conditions pro-
posed. _

The Tribunal, at this stage of the proceedings, rose,
owing to.the lateness of the hour ; and it fixed the further
hearing of the cause for Saturday next. M. Hobert will
then resume his pleading for MM. Aguado.

PARLIAMENTARY DIVISIONS.

HOUSE OF COMMONS.-APRIL 13.

(Prom the Votes and Proceedings of the House of
Commons.)

COUNTY ELECTIONS POLLS (SCOTLAND) BILL.
Clause 2 (Sheriff with consent of Lord-Advocate, to in-
crease or alter number and arrangement of polling places) :
—Amendment proposed, in page 1, lines 14 and 15, to leave
out the words, "with consent of her Majesty's Advocate
for Scotland for the time being :"—Question put, " That
the wordS proposed to be left out stand part of the clause :"
—The committee divided ; ayes 64, noes 53.
MAJORITY—AYES, 64.
Alcock, Thomas Hadfield, George Power, N.
Anderson, Sir James Hayter, W. G. Russell, Lord J.
Atherton, Wm. Herbert, Sidney Bawl e, C. B. G.
Brand, 11. Hervey, Lord Alfred Scobell, Capt.
Brotherton, J. Heyworth, L. Smith, it. V
Browne, V. Hushes, W. B. Stanley, En. W. 0.
Ilyng, G. 11. Charles Hume, J. Stapleton, John
Chambers, T. Ingham, Robert Strickland, Sir G.
Cockburn, Sir A. Johnstone, James Strut', Rt. Hon. E.
Craufurd, E. H. J. K 41117, P. J. Tancred, Henry Wm.
Crook, J. Ki::gscote, R. N. F. Thompson, G.
Crossley, F. Langston, J. 11. Towneley, C.
Dashwood, Sir G. H. Lockhart, A. E. Whalley, G.
Drarnmond, Henry WTaggart, Sir J. Whatman, J.
Duncan, George Milligan, It. Wilkinson, W.
Dundas, F. 311118, T. Winnington, Sir T. E
Dunlop, A. Monrrk, Lord Wise, J. A.
Evans, William Al oncrieff, J. Wyndham, W.
E wiz. t, William Moreton, Lord-
Fergus, J. Mulgrave, Earl TELLES&
Fitzgerald, J. D. None.) s, Lo d
Fitzwilliam, G. W. Oliveira, Benjamin Elliot, John
Grosvenor, Lord R. Phillimo: e, J. G. Kinuaird, A. F.

' • MINORITY—NOES, 53.
Anncsley, Earl of Creenall, G. rahner, Robert
Arbuthnott, General Ha'fbrd, .ir IL Repton, G. w. J.
Arkwright, G. liar court, Colonel Rushout, Captain
Baird Jamas Hayes, Sir Edmund Smijth, Sir W.
Barrow, W. H. Ileneage, G. H. W. Smith, W. 11..
Bentinck, Lord 11. Perbert, Sir Thomas Spooner, R.
Gtmpbeil, Sir Arch. Hotham, Lord Stanhope, James B.
Ca'nac, Sir J. It. Irton, Samuel Thes'ger, Sir F.
Christopher, R. Adam Kelly, Sir F. Trollope. r•ir J.
Duckworth, Sir J. Knatchbull, Win. F. Yans!ttart, George II
Bandits, O. Lockhart, W. Waddington, 11.
Dame, Col. Lovaine, Lord NVelby, Sir G. E.
Egerton, Edward li acirtney, G. Whitmore, Henry
Evelyn, W. J. Blacgregor, J,s
F. r •ham, E. B. Miles, W.
Fellowes, Edward Michell, W.
Eras, r, Sir W. A. Napier, Joseph
Freshfleld, J. W. Oakes, J. 11. P.
Gordon, A dir'rdl Cssulston, Lord Mackenzie, W. F.
Granby, Margitis of Puke, C. William Blair, Colonel

TELLERS.

Clause 4 (Poll to be kept open only one day) :—Amend-
ment proposed, in page 3, line 19, to leave out the words
" shall be directed to begin on a Monday or :" —Question
put, " That the words proposed to be left out stand part of
the clause :"—The committee divided ; ayes 61, noes 71.

MINORITY—AYES, 61.
Anderson, Sir James Fra er, Sir W. A. Moreton, Lo•d
Baines, M. T. Fredifiel 1, J. If ostyn, E. M.
Baird, J.trnes Grosvenor. Lord Mulgrave, Earl
Itarro,-, Win. 11. Hadfield, George Ossulston, Lord
B. ribow, John Harcourt, Col. Palmerston, Iris.
Br otherton, Joseph Hay ter, W. G. Prime, R.
Bynz, G. 11. C. Herbert, Sir Thomas Russell, LordJ.
Campbell, Sir A. Hervey, Lord Alfred Sawle, C. B. G.
Chambers, Thomas Johnstone, James Spooner, Richard
Charteris, F. Kingseote, R. N. F. ;Stanhope, J. B.
Craufurd, E. Langston, H. G. Thesiger, Sir F.
Crossly, Frank Lemon, Sir C. Thompson, George
Drummond, H. Lockhart, A. E. Whalley, G. H.
Dune-al, G. Lockhart, W. Whitmore, H.
Dunda., G. , , Luce, T. Wise, John A.
Dundas, F. Illaule, Colonel Wyndham, %Villain
Dunlop, A. Milligan, Robert Young, Sir John
Ev..ns, W. Mills, T.
Swart, William 311tehell, W.
Fergus, John Moncrelff, James
Fhzrov, Hon. 11. Monsell, William
Forster, C. Montgomery, Sir G.

TELLERS.

Elliot, 3. E.
Kinnaird. A F.

MAJORITY—NOES, 71.
Alcock, Thomas Fitzge aid, G. Pitillimore. J.
AnnesleV, Earl Forster, M. Smijth, Sir W.
Atimilin.t, Gen. French, Fitzstephen Smith, It.
Arkwright, G. Fuller, Angus us E. Smith, Wm. M.
Ball, John Gordon, Admiral Stapleton, J.
Bentinek, 'Lord H. Granby, Mtvouls Strickland, Sir G.
Blair, Colonel Herbert, Sidney Strati, Edward
Brand, H. Heyworth, Las runes Tomline, G.
Brown, V. Ilothatn, Lord Towneley, C.
Brown, W. Hughes, W. IL Trollop, Sir J.
Buck, Lewis W. Kelly, Sir F. Turner, C.
Carnac, Sir J. R. Knatchbull, W. F. Tynte, Col. C. J.
Christopher, It. A. Lewis, Sir T. Vansittart, G. 11.
Clinton, Lord C. P. Lowe, IL Vivian, J. II
Cockburn, Sir Alex. Macartney, (1: 11'addinton, H. S.
Crook, J, Mackenzie, WF. Walcot, Mm.
Dashwood, Sir G. Macgregor, James Welby, Sir G.
Pavison, lt. M'Ta •gart, Sir J. What man, James
Duune, Micha 1 Mlles, W. Wilkinson, W. A.
Egerton, E. Molesworth, Sir W. Wilson, James
Evelyn, W. - it, onek, Viscount Winnington, Sir T.
Farnham, E. Basil Napier, J.
Feilden, M. Norreys, Lord TELLERS.
Fellowes, Edward Oakes, J. H. Hume, J.
Fitzgerald, J. Faeke Charles W. Atherton, Wm.