The Sun.
London, England, 1854-06-13 00:00:00

THE SUN, LONDON, TUESTJAY EVENING, JUNE 13, 1854.

with the great and important change which he proposed
with reference to inland bills of exchange.
Mr. J. B. SMITH asked the right hon. gentleman what
amount he expected to raise upon foreign bills.
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER did not
believe that any man in England could give a reliable
estimate, but it was calculated that the foreign bills
drawn upon this country amounted to about 200,000,0001.
per annum, and the duty would be a shilling per cent.
Mr. SANDARS objected to the proposed tax upon fo-
reign bills.
Mr. JAMES MACGREGOR insisted that the tax would
be equal to 2. per cent. upon the bills drawl. Ho advised
the committee to take i lesson from the United States, and
apply their free system to bills of exchange.
Mr. HUME said he, for one, was prepared to do that.
Mr. MUNTZ was decidedly in favour of the proposed al-
terations with regard to inland bills, but he objected in tote
to placing a tax upon foreign bills. True, the amount was
small, but it would be none the less onerous.
The committee then divided, when there appeared—
For the clause 173

Against it
The clause was accordingly agreed to, as were also elauses
from 5 to 8 inclusive.

Mr. VANCE moved to leave out clause 9, relating to ex-
emption from receipt stamp duty by letters acknowledging
receipt of bills, &c., repealed.
After a short conversation the clause was postponed.
Clauses 10 and 11 were agreed to.
Mr. HADFIELD moved to add the following words to
Clause 11: " And, further, the duty charged in the said act
of last session (16 and 17 Vic. c. 63) on conveyance in Eng-
land and Ireland, and charter, disposition, or contract con-
taining the first original constitution of feu and ground an-
nual rents in Scotland, in consideration of any annual sum
payable in perpetuity, or for any indefinite period, whether
for farm-rent, feu-duty, ground-annual, or otherwise, shall
be abolished, and in lieu or substitution for such abolished
duty there shall be a duty on the same scale as on a lease
or tack of any lands, tenements, hereditaments, or herit-
able subjects at a yearly rent, without any sum of money
by way of fine, premium, or grassum paid for the same, or,
where the same shall be with such fine, premium, or gras-
sum, and also of a yearly rent amounting to 201. and up-
wards, then both the ad valorem, duties payable for a lease
in consideration of a fine only, and for a lease in considera-
tion of a rent only of the same amount ; and, further, that
in computing the rent chargeable with conveyance duty by
the said last-mentioned act, a duo allowance and deduction
shall be made from such rent for any original rout or rents
that the premises conveyed shall be subject or liable to."
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said this
alteration in the law would go the whole foundation of the
duties on conveyances. There must be a distinction drawn
between leaseholds and conveyances of freeholds, and al-
though there might be isolated cases of injustice, he yet
could not consent to alter the ad valorem, principle upon
which the existing duties were founded.
Mr. BRIGHT argued the case as one affecting the work-
ing classes, upon whom it inflicted great injustice, particu-
larly those living in the district of Manchester. The case
was simply this—a man who purchased a piece of land on
lease for 999 years, at a rental of 100/. per annum, paid a
duty of 10s. ; but the man who purchased a precisely simi-
lar piece of land at the same rental, but without any de-
fined term, paid a duty of 12/.103. Now that was a great
injustice, because the tax was professed to be levied ac-
cording to the value of the land which was the same in one
case as the other.

Mr. G. BUTT contended that it was necessary to pre-
serve this distinction between leaseholds and freeholds.

Mr. KIRK said the existing law operated most unjustly
in Ireland, where at least an eleventh of the whole land
was held upon renewable leases at small rentals.
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER confessed
himself ready to take the case of Ireland into consideration,
but he could not make any change to meet the exceptional
case contemplated by this amendment. As for the present
arrangement of the duties prejudicing the working or in-
dustrious classes, the alteration of last year was made ex-
pressly for their benefit, and it was only estates of more
value than 3501. that could possibly derive any advantage
for this proposed loss to the Exchequer.
Mr. HADFIELD said it was quite absurd to keep up a
distinction between real and personal property. That dis-
tinction was the cause of great and numerous anomalies.
Mr. MULLINGS said that, without giving any opinion
as to the propriety of the distinction, they must, as long
as they recognised different kinds of tenure, keep up a dis-
tinction between freehold and chattle interests.

Jr. DUNLOP was so well pleased with the concession
made last year that he felt repugnant to ask for more,
but the grounds on which the present concession was
asked were well founded, that he hoped the right hon.
gentleman would at least consider the question. It was
natural for all lawyers to wish to see the distinction kept
up, but what was desired was not to do away with the dis-
tinction, but to lay on the tax, not with regard to the
feudal tenure, but with regard to the substantial interest
of the property. (Hear.)
Mr. BROTHERTON said that the distinction between
real and personal property produced great anomalies. The
difficulty was to find the proper remedy.
Mr. BRIGHT said he would take the opinion of the
right hon. gentleman (the Chancellor of the Exchequer)
on a matter of fiscal arrangement sooner than, perhaps, that
of any other member of the house. He certainly had more
confidence in the way in which he proposed his taxes than
in any of his colleagues in any other matter. (Laughter.)
He had often stated that in private, and he now stated in
public, and he would not worry the right hon. gentleman
on this point were he not convinced, that if the right hon.
gentleman knew all the facts, instead of leaving it to his
hon. friend to propose this amendment, the right hon. gen-
tleman would propose it himself in the first instance. He
begged, therefore to press on the right hon. gentleman to
consider the question.
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said that
it was difficult to resist the hon. member for Manchester,
he was so complimentary. (Laughter.) He said that the
clause appeared to him to be one of which it was most dif-
ficult to understand the effect. But he would be perfectly
ready to consider whether something could not be done to
frame an equitable arrangement. (Hear.)
Mr. BRIGHT was quite satisfied that if the right hon.
gentleman understood the real hardship of the case, he
would agree with his hon. friend. He would suggest to
his 113 n. friend not to press his motion. Did the right
hon. gentleman intend to postpone the clause ?
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER—CertainIy
not. Tile clause was a good one. But he would consider
the other point.
Mr. HADFIELD withdrew his amendment, but gave
notice that he would propose it at a subsequent stage.
The clause was then agreed to.
Clauses 12, J 3, and 14, were agreed to.
. .

On clause 15, which empowers the commissioners of In-
land Revenue to require an affidavit,
Mr. HENLEY said it would put the party to expense.
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said that
the commissioners of Inland Revenue, on looking at the
instrument, might have a knowledge amounting to cer-
tainty that the true consideration for which it was granted
was suppressed, and it was in this case only that they
could call for an affidavit, this was the object with which
the clause was framed.

Mr. HENLEY said that ho merely referred to the ex-
pense of requiring the affidavit. It was not necessary to
send the parties to a solicitor. Any person could count
the number of words in the instriment.

Tho SOLICITOR-GENERAL said the clause, as it was
proposed, was more merciful and less costly to the party
than if the suggestion of the right hon. gentleman were
adopted.
After a conversation, in which Mr. Mullings, Mr. G.
Butt, and Mr. Phinn took part, the clause, as amended,
was agreed to, as was clause 16.
On clause 17, _ _

Mr. VA NCE complained of some peculiar burden to
which tho Dublin pawnbrokers were subject, under an old
act of Geo. 111.

Mr. WILSON said it was quite true they had to pay
1001. iu Irish money in order to carry on their trade ; but
they did not pay this to the Imperial exchequer, but to
the city of Dublin, which had chosen, instead of rating
the inhabitants generally, to lay a tax of 1001. a year on
pawnbrokers. (Laughter.) The pawnbrokers of Dublin
did not complain of the stamp duty, but were grateful for
its reduction by one-half. The Government had thought
they might reduce the duty in Dublin to the same amount
as was paid in provincial towns.
The clause was then agreed to, as was clause 18.
On clause 19,
Mr. VANCE objected to that part of the clause which
gave the public the opportunity of going to the stamp office
and claiming the discount on stamps to the amount of 51.
The result of this would be to injure the sellers of stamps,
who would hardly find it. worth while to keep their shops
open.

- The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said the
reduction of the limit at which discount might be claimed
had been made with reference to the decreased amount of
the stamp duties. It would be much better to leave this
matter to be settled between the Government and the
sellers of stamps.
The clause was then agreed to, as wore the remaining
clauses.

Mr. PHINN moved a new clause—" That every instru-
ment liable to stamp duty shall be admitted in evidence in
any criminal proceeding, although it may not have the
stamp required by law impressed ou or affixed thereto.
Agreed to. _ _

Oii the schedule,
Mr. WMALION said he had given notice of an amend-
ment for reducing the stamps to Id. and 2d. on bills not
exceeding 101. and 201. respectively ; but as he understood
the Chancellor of the Exchequer was willing to allow tholie
small stamps for bills of 51. and 101. respectively, he would
not press his amendment. Bills under 51. were at present
liable to several restrictions, with regard to other matters,
and he hoped to see those removed.
Mr. T. BARING said the result of these alterations
would be largely to increass the number of small bills,
which would add by so much to the circulation. For every
small purchase of 51. or 101. bills would b 3 given and
would be discounted. After trying to bring all our trans-
actions to cash limits, he doubted the propriety of the step
now taken. It would largely increase the number of small
bills in circulation, and would operate injuriously to the
trade of the country.
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said he
heard with regret the opinion of the hon. gentleman, but
he did not believe that these small bills were to be regarded
as an addition to the circulation. It was not at all with
the view of seeking relief from the fetters of a gold circu-
lation that this change had been proposed, but solely to
relieve tradesmen from the evils of their present system of
open credits, and to substitute for them certain and fixed
payments.
Mr. VANCE said he should certainly take the sense of
the house against the proposed ld. and 2d. bill stamps.
After a few words from Mr. FRENCH, _

Mr. VANCE, on being asked, declined to press his
amendment; and the schedules were gone through and
agreed to.
The house then resumed. _ _

Mr. VANCE asked if any reduction was contemplated
in the stamps on agreements for submission to arbitration ?
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said he had
received no representation on the subject, and he did not
mean to propose any reduction in the present bill.

granted to England and Wales, in relief of the county
rates for the maintenance of convicts, while the whole sum
granted to Ireland had only been 46,0001. In Ireland, too,
no expenses had been allowed to witnesses out of the Con-
solidated Fund, except in those cases which were called
" crown prosecutions." He thought that the Irish people
had a right to demand a committee of inquiry into the
whole subject.
The vote was agreed to.
17,3061. for the inspection of the prisons of the United
Kingdom.—Agreed to.
371,9331. for the Government prison and convict esta-
blishments at horse.

Sir J. PAIINGTON wished to know whether, in con-
sequence of the adoption of the system of penal servitude,
the Government intended to make any alteration in the
period of separate confinement with each person sentenced
to transportation had to undergo.
Viscount PALMERSTON said that the period of sepa-
rate confinement was formerly one year and sometimes
more. It had, however, appeared to him from information
he had received from persons engaged in the management
of prisons that that long period was likely to be injurious
both to the mental and the bodily health of the persons by
whom it was undergone. (Hear, hear.) It had therefore
been reduced to nine months as the maximum, but in cases
in which from the peculiar construction of the individual
even that period was likely to lead to any permanent in-
jury, a discretionary power had been allowed to shorten
the time. There were two very opposite opinions held by
persons employed in the management of prisons with re-
spect to the separate system. Some held that it was almost
invariably attended with the most beneEcial effects, that
it afforded time for reflection and opportrinities for exhor-
tation to reform ; and that, except in cases of weakly per-
sons, the effect was universally good. Others again thought
that it threw too great a strain upon the mind. (Hear.)
He (Lord Palmerston) believed that the truth lay between
the two ; and that to persons of strong constitution the
period of separate confinement often proved most salutary.
Mr. HENLEY asked if the noble lewd could lay before
the public the documents upon which he had founded the
opinion he had just expressed?
Lord PALMERSTON said it would be difficult to give
the grounds upon which he had arrived at the decision he
had stated ; for he had come to that conclusion, to a great
extent, upon the verbal communications which he had had
with persons in charge of the different prisons. The plan
adopted was to subject the convict first to separate confine-
ment in which he had little communication with the offi-
cers and none with the rest of the inmates. Next, he was
associated with the other prisoners, with whom he was now
allowed some intercourse, and lastly ho was sent to Port-
land or some other place where he could be employed on
the public works. In county prisons, if I )roperly conducted
there should boa certain part arranged. in separate cells,
in which the criminal could hold comm nnication with the
officers of the prison, the chaplain, or Vile person employed
in teaching him a trade. But there should be another part
in which the prisoners could be associated together; and
there should be a discretionary power in the governor as to
the period at which each person should be removed from
the one part of the prison to the other.
Mr. HENLEY believed that public opinion had of late
been undergoing a considerable change in the direction
pointed at by the noble lord; but he thought that the per-
sons on whose communications the noble lord had acted,
ought not to shrink from making a public report for the
information of those on whom the responsibility of sen-
tencing persons to imprisonment devolved.
Sir J. PAKINGTON concurred in the views of the
noble lord, and asked how long the now plan had been
acted upon.
Lord PALMERSTON—Since last autumn.
Mr. PALK asked whether the same system was pursued
at Dartmoor as at Pontonville?
Lord PALMERSTON said that persons were sent to
Dartmoor who were not strong enough for the public
works. He believed that the separate system was an essen-
tial part of the reformatory process, provided that it was
not carried too far.

Mr. MACARTNEY said the statement of the noble lord
would be read with great alarm in Ireland.
Mr. NEWDEGATE called the attention of the Govern-
ment to a case in which a notorious malefactor had been
released from prison on the understanding that be was to
be received in some person's employment. The man, how-
ever, did not stop in that employment for more than three
or four weeks, and there was too much reason to fear that
he had relapsed into his former licentious habits. Ho (Mr.
Newdegate) wished, therefore, to ask the noble lord what
regulations had been adopted to obtain some security that
convicts released under similar' circumstances should re-
main in their employment for some given period ?

Lord SEYAWUR reminded the committee that they
were told last year that transportation bad ceased, but he
had been astonished to find when looking at the estimate
that whereas the sum asked last year in respect of tran-
sportation was only 69,5181., the present vote was for
92,765/. Ou the other hand, supposing that transporta-
tion had ceased, it might reasonably be expected that the
expenses of establishments at home would be increased,
but the votes showed a decrease, last year being 407,0001,,
and the present 371,0001. The figures being so opposite to
what might bo expected, ho shouid be glad of a few words
in explanation from the noble lord, as he thought that so
momentous a change as was now taking place in our sys-
tem of banishment ought to be fully understood by the
house.

Sir J. PAKINGTON wished also to put another ques-
tion. Ho desired to know how the present remnant of
transportation was carried on. It seemed that a certain
portion of prisoners were transported, and it was desirable
that the principle should be understood ou which the
selection was made. _

Lord PALMERSTON said that when a prisoner was
released it was of course difficult to take any positive
security that he would find employment. Sometimes
an application was made for a pardon, which was granted
to a prisoner whose offence was not serious, on con-
dition that his family would find employment for
him. Of course Government could only go upon the
representations which were made in such inquiries as the
circumstances of tho case afforded. When a pardon was
granted all control over the discharged prisoner was at an
end. But in case of a ticket of leave, there was a bold over
tho party released, for if he misconducted himself the very
condition on which he was released was broken—for the
ticket of leave was granted on the proviso that he should
be liable on misconduct to be called back again to complete
his term of penal servitude. He (Lord Palmerston) was
glad to state that out of the considerable number who had
been released, a very small proportion had been guilty of
misconducting themselves, and in those cases means had at
once been taken of bringing the parties back to the public
works from which they had been sent. With regard to the
question of tho noble lord (Seymour) the excess of the pre-
sent estimate arose principally from the increased price of
provisions abroad in Australia. There was, however, every
reason to think that the substitution of the present system
of imprisonment for the old system of transportation would
tend much to decrease the expense of prisoners. It would
of course necessitate an increase in the accommodation, or
rather the means, of lodging prisoners. With regard to the
system of transportation still existing a certain number of
prisoners—about 900—were proposed to be sent to Austra-
lia in the present year. Those were selected who were
thought likely to be most useful in the colony. The selec-
tion was not made on the ground of the offences which
were committed by the parties.

Capt. SCOBELL remarked that the salaries for last year
were but 60,0004., while this year they were 71,0001 al-
though the number of convicts was 3,000 less."
Mr. HENLEY said it appeared from the statement of
the noble lord (Palmerston) that all the best of the prison-
ers were sent abroad and all the greatest rogues left in Eng-
land and then turned loose on society. He should like to
know how many of these rogues were so turned loose ; as
9,0001. was charged for them it could be no small number.
Mr. FITZROY said that in the course of last year 1,194
prisoners were discharged, and out of this large number it
had only been found necessary to revoke the tickets of
leave of three. The item of 9,000/. rose in this way—it
was thought desirable to give the persons discharged the
means of returning to their native place, and also enough
to purchase necessary clothing. During their term of im-
prisonment a certain portion of their earnings was put by
for them according to their conduct. Thus, for the first
class, 9d. a week; for the second, 6d. ; and for the third,
3d. per week was retained. This money was given to them
upon their discharge in order that they might not come
upon the world totally unprovided for. Notice has been
taken of the increase of salaries in the vote. This arose
from a reason to which reference had already been made—
the increased price of food and other commodities in Aus-
tralia.
In answer to Mr. HENLEY,
Mr. FITZROY said that in a case where transportation
for seven years had been awarded, three years' penal servi-
tude was considered equivalent—a conditional ticket only
being given at the end of that time for the remainder of
the term.
Mr. SPOONER observed an entryin theestimates under
the head special services, in these words " Provision for
Roman catholic priests, 5501." He wished to ask an ex-
planation of this, and to know what these special services
were. Also, as this was a perfectly new vote, he should
like to know if it was to be a continuous one.
Lord PALMERSTON—I suppose the hon. gentleman
wants really to know whether Catholic priests are to be
allowed in prisons. (Mr. Spoouer shook his head in dis-
sent.) Well, then, all that is to be said is that the 5501.
is for Catholic priests who are attending convicts in catho-
lic gaols.
Mr. SPOONER wished to know whether the vote refer-
red to Government prisons only ?
Lord PALMERSTON replied that the estimate, was for
the attendance of priests Upon koman catholic prisoners
in Government prisons.
Mr. SPOONER thought that answer very unsatisfac-
tory. (A laugh.) If Roman Catholic priests were to be
paid, why not the ministers of other dissenting sects? A
man had already a right to send for the minister, whatever
sect he belonged, but the minister was not to be paid.
(Laughter, and ironical cheering.) This was, in fact, pay-
ing for what the Sovereign declared in her coronation oath
to be a blasphemous, false, and a dangerous deceit. He
knew no reason why he should say more on the subject.
(Laughter.)
Lord PALMERSTON said, though he might not be so
vehement a Protestant as the hon. gentleman opposite, he
flattered himself he was as sincere an one. If violent
speeches in that house, if hard words and cutting off of
estimates, could convert all their fellow-subjects, he should
join with the hon. gentleman, and vote for his motion ;
but, unfortunately, neither the hon. gentleman's efforts,
nor his, if he were to join him, could have the effect that
ho desired. And, therefore, as it happened that they had
a large proportion of their countrymen who were Catholics,
ho thought it better to treat their religion with respect,
and to give to those who were of that faith the means of
becoming better Christians than they might happen to be
in the condition to which they were reduced. The hon.
gentleman was mistaken in supposing that the principle on
which this vote was founded was new, because the system
had been in practice for several years at Millbank. At
Millbank there was a regular allowance to a Catholic priest
for attending the convicts. The convicts on arriving
declared themselves whether they were Catholic or Protes-
tant. Those who were Catholics were regularly attended
by the Catholic priests, who performed divine (service to
them on Sundays, Good Fridays, and Christmas days. The
priests attended once a week in ministration on the male
prisoners, and once a week in ministration on the female
prisoners. At Millbank also, when a convict was ill, so as
to show that he ought to have religious consolation, if he
was a Catholic, the priest was sent for to give him mini-
stration. That system was established before his time,
and he thought it a good one, and it was his intention
that it should be extended to all the Government prisons,
and for this purpose an additional vote was proposed to
the house in the estimates for this year. It did not occur
to him that the Protestant succession or the throne was
likely to be in danger by this vote. (Laughter.) He
could not seriously deal with the alarm of the bon. gentle-
man. He was not of opinion that they should wait always
till a convict wished to have a priest, and that then the
priest should come at his own cost. In the first place, the
man who most wanted spiritual assistance was the man
who was least likely to ask for it. What was the object
they were aiming at by their prison discipline ? It was not
mere punishment : it was a combination of punishment
with reformation. They wanted to avail themselves of the

period during which the man was confined to give a new
turn to his thoughts, to discipline him with ideas and
feelings, which probably never entered his mind before.
They wished to turn him out at the end of his period of
confinement a bettor man, and less likely to be dangerous
to the community. How were they to do it ? The Pro-
testant had the ministrations of his clergyman, but the
Catholic could not advantageously receive the ministra-
tions of a clergyman who was not of his own faith. They
could not expect that the ministration of a Protestant cler-
gyman would have great effect on the mind of a Catholic
convict any more than they could expect that the minis-
tration of a Catholic clergyman could have great effect on
a Protestant. If the hon. member for Warwickshire were
to be attended by a Catholic priest he did not suppose that
he would derive much advantage from it. They wanted to
get at the mind of the man, and they must employ some-
body who could reach it. They must, therefore, employ
the clergyman of the man's own persuasion. The system
was introduced by Sir G. Grey, and under it a Catholic was
not at liberty to refuse attending Catholic worship ; he, like
a Protestant, must attend divine worship conducted by his
own clergyman. If a Protestant wished to turn Catholic, or
a Catholic wished to turn Protestant, he had a fortnight for
reflection, and then he acted according to his ultimata de-
cision • but a Catholic priest did not come into contact with
a Protestant, and therefore the hon. member need not be
alarmed that our prisons would be turned into places
for converting Protestants to Catholicism. But he was sure
the house would feel that our prisons were not to be used
for the purpose of turning Catholics into Protestants. That
was not the purpose for which prisons were established.
He could not persuade himself that the house would feel
any doubt that such a provision as that which they now
asked for was a proper one. What they wanted was to
give men who had committed crime, who had been sen-
tenced to punishment for those crimes, while undergoing
that sentence, an opportunity to have their minds im-
proved, to give them a sense of right and wrong, and that
could only be done by giving them the opportunity of re-
ligious instruction from some minister of religion whose
doctrine was their own, and who therefore could appeal to
those feelings which their nature or their education might
have implanted in their minds (Cheers.)
Mr. SCHOLEFIELD regarded the proposition of his
hon. friend as dictated by narrow and bigoted views. He
was willing to pay for chaplains of the Church of England,
the richest in the country, while he refused to give any-
thing to the priests of the poorest.
Mr. NE WDEGATE supported the amendment on the
ground that every concession to Rome was an encourage-
ment to the aggressions of Rome. If Romanist chaplains
were admitted into our prisons, justice demanded that all
dissenters ought to be placed upon the same footing. To
accept this proposition would, in fact, be to sanction the
erection of another Established Church.
Mr. DRUMMOND thought the vote ill-advised.
Mr. ADDERLEY approved of the amendment, because
the vote had not been Justified by sound principle.
Mr. CROSSLE f opposed the vote on the ground that
the State ought not to pay any sect whatever for religious
instruction.

Mr. HO tiSFALL could not on principle consent to the
proposed vote, because it involved the teaching of error.
It, moreover, involved a violation of theconstitution. And
he did not see how those who consented to this grant could
refuse to endow the Roman Catholic priesthood.
Mr. W. J. FOX eulogised the religious zeal and moral
qualities of the Roman Catholic clergy; and expressed
sorrow at see'ng hon. members of the same persuasion
striving to obtain a miserable pittance of public money
for their own purposes. His own principles pledged him
to oppose every attempt to bestow the public money for
religious purposes ; and, therefore, ' he should support the
amendment, though he should do so with regret.
After a few words from Mr. J. BALL,
Sir J. PAKINGTON adulated the necessity of pro-
viding spiritual instruction for the inmates of our gaols,
but said it could only be given upon one of two principles.
It should be given either through a chaplain of the estab-
lished religion, or the gaol should be thrown open to all
sects. But the proposal of the Home Secretary did neither
the one nor the other. It had not the merit of toleration,
inasmuch as it benefited only one sect, and was evidently
the result of pressure. Under these circumstances he
should support the amendment, but if the vote had been
for the spiritual instruction of those prisoners who did not
belong to the Church of England, he should have assented
to it.

Mr. HADFIELD vindicated the principle of the State
paying no religious sect whatever.
Mr. LUCAS, alluding to the objections of Nonconfor-
mists to receive money from the State in return for spiri-
tual instruction, road returns relative to several prisons,
which ho contended showed that if they did not receive the
money neither did they perform the work. The Roman
Catholics and the Church of England discharged a duty,
but the Nonconformists did nothing. Besides the Church
of England there was, therefore, nobody to perform the
service but the Roman Catholics ; and, performing the
work, they naturally asked the noble lord, the Home Sec
retary, for the payment. With respect to Mr. Spooner's
amendment, he contended that the hon. member did not
carry out his own principles, inasmuch as he only proposed
to strike out one item of payment to Roman Catholic
chaplains, whilst the vote included half-a•dozen others.
Mr. MILES said the vote might be small, but it in-
volved a great principle—the principle of establishing
Roman Catholic chaplains in Government prisons in Eng-
land Tbis was a Protestant question, and he trusted it
would be so dealt with by all classes of Protestants.
Mr. MIALL briefly addressed the house, amidst loud
cries of " Divide."

Mr. SPOONER, in reply, defended himself from the
charge of having used " hard words." He was aware that
there were other grants to Roman Catholic priests; but
this beinc, a new vote, he felt it right to make a stand
upon it. Illear, hear.) His simple object in opposing it
WRY to raise a Protestant voice in that house. (Hear,
hear.) He believed that to vote a sum for the propaga-
tion of the Roman Catholic religion would be a national
sin. (Laughter.)
The committee then divided.
For the amendment
Against it 136 —22
Mr. SCHOLEFIELD inquired whether be could bring
on his amendment to further reduce the vote by the amount
of the salaries of the chaplains and the assistant chaplains.
Mr. BOUVERIE said he could not. By the practice of
the committee, when an amendment of this kind was car-
ried, the smaller sum was considered to have been voted.
The CHAIRMAN then reported progress.
EXCISE DUTIES (SUGAR) BILL.
This bill was read a second time.
LEASING POWERS (IRELAND) BILL.
This bill was read a second time.
TENANTS COMPENSATION (IRELAND) BILL.
On the motion for the second reading of this bill,
Sir J. YOUNG could not assent to the principle of this
bill, and therefore must oppose the second reading.
Mr. MAGUIRE thought this matter ought fairly to be
discussed, together with the other bills which had been
read a second time. He proposed that this measure also
should be read a second time pro forma, and then the whole
matter could be discussed in committee.
Lord PALMERSTON said it was impossible to enter
into a discussion on this bill at that late hour. However
willing the Government might be, the house was not.
Mr. DISRAELI thought that the practice of passing
bills pro forma was an injurious one. He could not con-
sent to such a course on this occasion.
After a few words from Mr. LucAs,
Mr. J. O'CONNEL proposed that the day for going into
committee on the Landlord and Tenant and Leasing
Powers Bill should be fixed at a late period of the session.
This, he thought, would obviate all difficulty.
A:discussion then took place, in which Mr. M`Mahon,
Mr. Lucas, and Mr. Maguire took part. As each hon.
gentleman resumed his seat, a larger and larger body rose,
and the number of Irish members trying to catch the
Speaker's eye was becoming quite appalling, when
Mr. BROTHERTON moved that the house do now
(20 minuta past 1) adjourn.
Mr. DISRAELI said that before that question was de-
termined it was important to arrange what was to be done
in reference to the order for the second reading of the
Drainage of Lands Bill, which had been fixed for a morn-
ing sitting. When the subject had been mentioned at an
earlier period of the evening, the general feeling of the
house appeared to be against a morning sitting—(hear)—
but hon. members also felt a delicacy in disturbing the ar-
rangement for going into committee at Li o'clock, until the
hon. member for Dorsetshire (Mr. Ker Seymer) had been
communicated with. That communication had been made,
and the hon. gentleman had no objection to the order being
discharged. He (Mr. Disraeli) therefore proposed that the
order should be discharged accordingly.
The SPEAKER said that the motion for the adjourn.
ment of the house must bo disposed of before the right
hon. gentleman's proposition could be entertained.
Mr. V. SCULLY asked if the second reading of the
Landlord and Tenant Bill had been postponed or not. The
learned serjeant (Mr. Serjeant Shee) he knew was under
the impression that the three bills should go on together.
The SPEAKER said the Landlord and Tenant (Ireland)
Bill and the Leasing Powers Bill had both been read a se-
cond time, and ordered to be committed on Thursday.
Sir J. YOUNG said he had no conception when be
moved these bills that any one was intending to oppose
them. In committee there would be ample opportunity to
discuss them. The clerk read the titles distinctly in an
audible voice, and if hon. members did not oppose them he
could not help it. So far as he knew there had been no
agreement with any one about these bills. There was a
peat deal of difference in these bills. The third bill was
opposed by a large majority in the house.
• • Lord PALMERSTON suggested that the bill should be
fixed for Thursday—not that it could come on then, but
they could then determine on what day the bill should be
taken.

After some further conversation, Mr. BROTHERTON with-
drew his motion for adjournment, and the second reading
of the bill was fixed for Thursday.
COURTS OF COMMON LAW (IRELAND) BILL.
Mr. WHITESIDE said he should withdraw this bill.
The order for the bill being committed was then dis-
charged.

MORNING SITTINGS.
On the motion of Mr. DISRAELI, the twelve o'clock
orders for this day wire postponed until Friday.
Mr. DISRAELI moved that the Lands Improvement
Bill, which stood for committee at twelve o'clock on Thurs-
day, should also be postponed.
Sir J. YOUNG resisted the motion.
Mr. DISRAELI announced his intention to oppose all
morning sittings at this period of the session, considering
that there was no pressure of public business.
Lord PALMERSTON said the government would not
trouble the house to divide on the motion.
The twelve o'clock order for Thursday was, therefore,
discharged.
Sir J. YOUNG then moved that the Lands Improve-
ment Bill should be committed on this day week, at
twelve o'clock, but this motion meeting with opposition,
it was ultimately withdrawn.
The house then adjourned at ten minutes to 2 o'clock.

A CHINESE NEWSPAPER IN SAN FRANCISCO.—We
.have received the first number of a newspaper published
in the Chinese language and printed in Chinese charac-
ters, which has been started in this city as the organ
of the Celestial population. It is entitled the Gold
Hills News, California being known among the Chinese
as " the Gold Hills." As usual with many of the
Oriental languages, one has to read Chinese from top
to bottom, instead of from left to right. The News
presents a very fair typographical appearance for
Chinese ; that is to say, it looks as if a spider out of
an ink-bottle had crawled over a sheet of white paper.
We are not very familiar with the Chinese characters,
but from appearances we should judge that the " salu-
tatory" of the editor was particularly eloquent. It
abounds in a number of hieroglyphics that strongly
resemble centipedes, with an occasional dish of taran-
tulas. The Chinese population of this State numbers at
least 25,000, and, as they nearly all know how to read,
notwithstanding the length of time and labour it re-
quires to attain that accomplishment, there is no doubt
the Gold Hills News will be well supported.—San Fran-
cisco lierald.

CITY OF LONDON ELECTION.

MR. URQUHART'S ADDRESS TO THE
LIVERYMEN OF LONDON.

Yesterday afternoon, at 4 o'clock, Mr. Urquhart, who,
it is stated, is about being put in nomination against the
Right Hon. Lord John Russell, upon his re-election for
the City, consequent upon accepting office, addressed a
public meeting in the Common Hall.
Mr. Urquhart was attended by Mr. Francis Bennoch,
the chairman of his own election committee and two or
three others who are engaged in promoting his return.
The hall was very full, and in the galleries and
amongst the crowd were a great number of the Common
Councilmen, some ebulition of public feeling being anti-
cipated. There was a somewhat large body of police
stationed about.

Mr. URQUHART, who was received with considerable
cheering, said that he came before them a solitary man,
and threw himself upon the indulgence of those be-
fore him, and had come forward solely to rescue
the representation of the great city of London from being
the pocket borough of a Coalition Ministry. He wished
to know where was the man of great mind, a liberal sen-
timent, whom they were told to elect for this great city.
(Groans.) He wished that groan to be reported, and
he would accept the charge of a calumniator if he at-
tacked a better man than himself. He charged
the Ministry with having caused the war, and they
were told to recollect Lord John Russell, because
he was part of that Ministry. There was no occa-
sion for wars—(groans and unanimous cries of " Yes")—
and if there was, he and his colleagues had caused it.
(No, no.) Ho then proceeded at some length to con-
condemn the Ministry. (A voice—This is nothing but
abuse.) It was not. He charged them with grave
crimes. They had suppressed for years past the corres-
pondence relative to Russia and Turkey. The Turks
had already beaten the Russians ; therefore our troops
were not wanted. They had done nothing, and our
assistance was not called for. (Groans, and cries of
Yes, yes.) He then went into a detail of his Liberal
views, and said he should go to the poll.
Several others, then, admidst much derisive cheering,
addressed the meeting.

SHIPPING INTELLIGENCE.

NOTICES TO MARINERS.
RED BEACON BUOY, MOLE AT GIBRALTAR.

Lloyd's Agency-office, Gibraltar, May 29.
Masters of vessels arriving here have to notice that there
is a red beacon buoy placed 500 feet in a direct line from
the New Mole Poiut in this bay, denoting shoal water
within it, from the deposit of stone for the elongation of
the said mole. The following is also the copy of a report
recently made by Mr. W. W. Kiddie, master of her Ma-
jesty's ship Cruiser

"-Red beacon buoy in 11 fathoms, bearing from the New
Mole head, N., 15 W. by compass, distant 500 feet.
Marks—Outer end of the Mole, at the Ragged Staff, on
with the centre of the Moorish Castle, N. 29E."

NEW LIGHT ON PLANA, OR TABARCA ISLAND (12 MILES

SOUTH OF ALICANTE).

Alicante, June 1.
On and after the present date, a light lately erected on
Plana, or Tabarca Island, 12 miles south of this port, will
be exhibited from sunset to sunrise. This lighthouse is
situate in lat. 33 10 13 N., and long. 5 45 38 E., is bright
fixed, flashing every two minutes, and erected at 98 feet
above the level of the sea, at the north-east extremity of
the said island, which we beg to mention for the informa-
tion of mariners.

THE BLACK SEA.
RELEASE OF ENGLIS t VESSELS AT ODESSA.
A despatch has been received by her Majesty's Govern-
ment, from Vice-Admiral Dundas, reporting that the Rus-
sian Government had permitted all British and French
vessels to leave Odessa.
PIRACY AND MURDER IN THE GREEK WATERS.
Despatches have been received from her Majesty Minister
at Athens, from her Majesty's Consul at the Pirmus, re-
lating to acts of piracy and murder committed in the
Greek waters. With reference to the Harriet, of London,
which had been plundered and the crew murdered, the
Earl of Clarendon has given instructions that a reward be
offered for the apprehenition and conviction of the guilty
persons. It appears that this vessel, when off the port of
Gavrio, was boarded by a Greek schooner, having on board
volunteers for Stilida, and on being afterwards boarded
by the authorities, there was every reason to believe that
the crew had all been murdered, as the decks were full of
blood and the crew missing. It was feared that in a very
few weeks the whole of the Archipelago will swarm with
pirates, and much property and many lives will be lost.

LIVERPOOL, Juno 12.—The fiat Railway King, from
Bardsea, for this port, with limestone, foundered at sea on
the 9th of June; crew landed at Blackpool.—The Royal
Mail steamer Ot. awa, which left Portland on the 31st of
May, has arrived at this port.—The Royal Mail steamer
Europa, which left New York on the 31st of May, has
arrived here. She has $659,277 specie, of which $300,000
are for Havre.

MELBOURNE, March 9.—The Earl of Dalhousie, bound
to this port, which put back to Launceston, Van Die-
men's Land, on the 22d of February, leaky, struck on
Whirlpool Rock on her way down again, and lies full of
water. 4th—The barque Berwick Castle, from Hobart-town,
bound to this port, has been totally wrecked on Moriarty's
Bank ; crew picked up on the 28th of February, by the
Red Lion, arrived at Hobart Town. 16th.—The wreck cf
the Innellan, from London and Portland, which was driven
on shore at Port Fairy, on the 27th of February, has been
sold for 501., and her cargo for 2001. The wool of the
Dundee, for London, which was wrecked the same day,
and at the same time, has been sold at 81. per bale. The
Elizabeth Ellen arrived at this port, in lat. 44, and long.
73 E., met with so severe and sudden a gale as to carry
away her main and mizen masts.

frOBART TOWN, March 10.—The Mary Ann reports the
crew of the Tubal Cain having set fire to that ship outside
of Port Philip Heads, on the night of March 3.
SYDNEY. New South Wales, March 13.—Accounts from
Hobart Town give the following particulars of damage sus-
tained in the late gale. The Culloden suffered severely ;
the Britons' Queen was ashore, with her bottom seriously
damaged, and the Padama unshipped her rudder. The
Marianne (after discharging coals), the Henrietta, the
Eclipse, and the barque Nautilus, were driven together ;
the stern of the Nautilus was carrried away by the bows
of the Eclipse, the Marianne had a hole pierced in her side,
the Eclipse, which had a large cargo on board, and was
ready to sail for Melbourne, received little injury, but was
making water.
LAUNCEBTON, March 3.—Accounts from Melbourne
state that the West Wind, lying at anchor on the north
shore at that port, took fire en the 21st of February, and
was towed to the west side of the Jetty.
QUEBEC, May 27.—The Aldebaron, from Poole for this
port, was struck by sea on the 18th of May, which carried
away the round-house, mizenmast, rudder, &c., together
with the master, and seven men one of whom only saved ;
the survivors were taken off five days after by the St. Bre-
lade, bound for Shippegan, and transferred to the Daunt-
less, arrived here ; the Aldebaron when abandoned was in
a sinking state. The London, of Gloucester, from Cardiff
for this port, foundered on the 19th of April, in lat. 47
N., long. 36 W. ; crew saved. The lon, which arrived at
Grosse Isle on the 22d of May, reports having been in con-
tact with the Barossa, from Leith for Montreal, seven
men of which got on board the lon ; on the 15th the Ba-
rossa was fallen in with by the Louisa, arrived here, and
supplied with two seamen and four passengers, with whom
she was coming up, having repaired damage. The Eagle,
arrived here, have on board part of the crew of the York-
shire Lass, which foundered at sea. Memorandum—The
Yorkshire Lass sailed from Newport on the sth of April
for this port.

VESSELS SPOKEN WITH.
The Reindeer, from Liverpool, for Guatemala, June 5,
in lat. 50 N., long. 9 W.
The Orinoco (supposed) with two transports in tow,
May 31, off Cape Gozo.
The Tamaulipas and the Jason, June 1, 68 miles W. of
Cape Bon.
The Himalaya, 340 miles N. of Algiers.
The Transport No. 82, June 6, 30 miles N. of the Bar-
lings. _ _

The Candia, June 7,10 miles N. of the Burlings.
The Gratitude, from Shields for Bahia, April 23, in lat.
30 N., long. 3 47.

The John Bull, of and from Liverpool, Jun© 3, in lat
50 N. low?• 12 W.
.

The bai:ques showing first distinguishing pendants Nos.
4,278 and 5,846, May 31, in lat. 42 N., long. 11 W.
The Dolphin, for London, June 3, in lat. 40 N. long. 9
W.

[ADVERTISEMENT.]—Du Barry's Delicious Revalenta
Arabica Food invariablyrestores health, without medicine,
inconvenience, or expense, as it saves 50 times its cost in
other remedies. We extract a few out of 50,000 testi-
monials of cures, which had resisted all medicines. Cure
No. 180. —" Twenty-five years' nervousness, constipation,
indigestion, and debility, from which I had suffered great
misery, and which no medicine could remove or relieve,
have been effectually cured by Du Barry's food in a very
short time.—W. B. Reeve, Pool Anthony, Tiverton."
Cure No. 4,208.—" Eight years' dyspepsia, nervousness,e
11v
debility, with cramps, spasms and nausea, been
effectually removed by Du Barry's delicious food in a very
short time.—Rev. John W. Flavell, Ridlington Rectory,
Norfolk.' Cure No. 1,784—" Not expected to live six
days longer. I was cured by Du Barry's admirable food.
—Magdalena Purvis, Moffatt, Scotland." Cure No.
51,416. —" Fifty years' indescribable agony from dyspepsia,
nervousness, asthma, cough, constipation, flatulency,
spasms, sickness at the stomach and vomitings, have been
removed by Du Barrv's excellent Food.—Maria Jolly,
Wortham, Ling, hear Diss, Norfolk." Cure No. 3,900.
" Thirteen years' cough, indigestion, and general
debility have been removed by Du Barry's excellen
Ford.—James Potter, Athol-street, Perth." Cure
No. 81.—" Twenty years' liver complaint, with
disorders of the stomach and nerves, have been
perfectly cured by Du Barry's Revalenta Arabica.—
Andrew Frazer, Haddington, East Lothian." " Treva.gler,
Gulval, near Penzance. Feb. 20th, 1851.—Eighteen years'
nervous debility, violent palpitation of the heart, throb-
bing of the temples, violent pains in the left side and back,
shortness of breath, coughs, numbness of the extremities,
cramps, spasms, flatulency, retching, and such general
weakness, that I was constantly fearful of falling when on
ray legs ; all these symptoms have been removed by Du
Barry's excellent Food.—Mary Gilbert."—ln canisters,
suitably packed for all climates, and with full instructions
—l]b., 2s. 9d.; 21b., 45. 6d. • 51b., lls. ; 121 b., 21,5. ;
super-refined, llb., 6s. ; 21b., lls. ; 51b., 225. ; 101 b., 338
The 101 b. and 121 b. carriage free, on post office order.
Barry du Barry and Co., 77, Regent-street, London ;
Fortnum, Mason, and Co., purveyors to her Majesty. Pic-
cadilly; also at 68, Cornhill; 60, Gracechurch-street ;
330 and 451, Strand, 63 and 150, Oxford.street ; 55,
Charing-cross.; 4, Cheapside.
- -

---
[ADVERTISEMENT.]--The Earl of Aldborough and
Holloway's Pills.—An astounding cure by this miracu-
lous medicine after every other means had failed. See
extract from his lordship's letter, dated " Villa Messina,
Leghorn, Feb. 21, 1845. To Professor Holloway.
Sir--I bog to acquaint you that your pills have effected
a cure of a disorder in my liver and stomach, which all
the most eminent of the faculty at home and all over the
Continent had not been able to effect—nay, not even the
waters of Carlsbad or Marienbad. (Signed) Ald-
borough." .These wonderful pills will cure any disorders
of the liver or stomach.--Sold (also Holloway's oint-
ment) at Prosessor Holloway's Establishment, 244,
Strand, London, and II all medicine-venders thr9ugli-
out the world.