The Sun.
London, England, 1853-09-21 00:00:00

MIDDLESEX SESSIONS.—Sept. 20.

STEALING NOTES.
Mary Keighly, 24, was indicted for stealing a pocket-
book and 1501. in hank notes, the property of -Thomas
Hollis, from his person.
The prosecutor stated that he arrived in this country
from Port Philip a short time ago. He was living at a
coffee-house at Paddington, and one day he met the pri-
soner in Hyde-park. They bad some conversation, in
the course of which she told him that she was hungry
and friendless, and he then took her to a public-house,
and gave her some refreshment. They prolonged their
stay till eight o'clock at night, by which time each of
them were rather " fresh," and they then walked to the
park, and separated. Immediately after she was gone
he missed his pocket-book, in which there were two
bank notes for 150/. ; but he did not tell anybody, as he
was a total stranger to the mode of proceeding in such
matters. When he got home he told his landlord, and,
acting on his advice, he went and told the police.
From the other evidence it appeared that the prisoner,
who could neither read nor write, was quite ignorant of
the value of the notes. She went to a public-house and
asked for change for a Si. note, placing on the counter
one for 1001. When questioned as to how she came by
it, she gave very unsatisfactory answers, and she was
given into custody. On being searched, the pocket-
book, a 501. note, and some loose money were found
upon her. The prosecutor went to the place he got the
notes from and got the numbers, which he handed to
the police, and the numbers on the two notes in question
were the same.

The jury found the prisoner guilty.
Mr. Witham sentenced her to six months' hard labour,

POLICE INTELLIGENCE.

MANSION-HOUSE.—PRE-ENGAGING A SEAT IN
AN 03INIBUS.—illichad Davison, the driver of a Peck-
ham, omnibus, was summoned for having refused to
allow a gentleman to take a vacant place in his omnibus.
Mr. S. Hood, iron merchant, said—On the 15th of
September I saw the defendant acting as conductor to
his omnibus, and asked to be allowed to take a seat
which I observed was vacant. The omnibus was
licensed to carry 12 inside, and there were no more
than 11 seated when I applied. The defendant said his
omnibus was full, but I distinctly counted only 11 pas-
sengers. He rudely pushed me away, and I afterwards
saw a gentleman enter.

The defendant said, in answer to the charge, that he
had been saving a place for a gentleman who had been
constantly in the habit of going and coming in the
omnibus.

Mr. R. Pearce, jeweller, of Banner-street, said that
he had been for several years in the habit of riding in
the omnibus alluded to, and it was his practice to pay
the conductor if he happened, by business or accident,
to miss the time. He had not, on the present occasion,
either paid his fare or booked his place.
The Lord Mayor recommended the witness, if he was
desirous to secure his place, to pay the fare beforehand,
as an omnibus was a public vehicle, and the defendant
had no right to retain a 'plaee for him under such cir-
cumstances as had been represented.
A gentleman here interposed and said that both the
driver and conductor were well behaved persons, and,
no doubt, judging from the character of the defendant,
he had acted from an error of judgment.
The Lord Mayor--He shall have the advantage of his
good character. If he had not been so described I
would inflict upon him the full penalty of 11., but ss.
will now satisfy the justice of the case.

BOW-STREET—OVERLOADING CARTS IN COVENT-
GARDEN.—ShortIy before the court closed, Alderman
Marshall waited upon the presiding magistrate to draw
his attention to a practice now prevailing among the
dealers in Covent-garden Market, which was fraught
with danger to the public. He alluded to their man-
ner of overloading their vans, by which the empty
vegetable baskets were carried away after the day's
sale. At the present moment there was a waggon near
the Piazza with baskets piled one above the other in
columns, upwards of twenty feet in height above the top
of the van. These were tied loosely together with cords,
and he (Alderman Marshall) was certain that a very
slight occurrence, calculated to disturb its equilibrium,
would cause the whole mass to topple over into the street,
and the consequences might be dreadful. He had so con-
stantly seen these formidable loads traversing the
thoroughfares of the Metropolis, west of Temple-bar,
that he felt it his duty to call at the court and mention
the circumstance, trusting that his worship would send
one of the officers round to judge for himself of the peril
attending the van in question.
Mr. Henry- said he was well aware of the practice re-
ferred to, and if it could be proved to endanger the lives
of the public, some steps might be taken to prevent it.
It did not appear that the dealers were limited to any
particular height by the act, although they could not
exceed a certain bulk. He would send round one of the
inspectors to see what could be done.

LA MBETH.— REMOVAL or NursANozs.— A deputa-
tion from the inhabitants of Westminster Bridge-road
and its vicinity waited on Mr. Seeker (who sat for Mr.
Elliott), to solicit his advice and assistance in the abate-
ment or total removal of a dangerous nuisance. '
Mr. G. Hill, one of the deputation, said the nui-
sance himself and his fellow-inhabitants of the West-
minster Bridge-road had to complain of was that
caused by the melting down of putrid fat on the pre-
mises of Mr. Rhodes, No. 1, Carlisle-street, Lambeth.
The stench emitted from this building, particularly
in the fore part of the day, was of the most rank, deadly,
sickening, and dangerous description, and it had,
there was little doubt, produced the first case of cholera
in the parish. in June last, the inhabitants of the
Bridge-road and its vicinity memorialised the board of
guardians, praying that steps might be taken by them
for its removal ; but the answer they received was, that
they had not the power to interfere, but that an indict-
ment at the sessions was the only remedy for the re-
moval of the nuisance. The Board of Health had also
been applied to in the hope of having something done,
but those gentlemen referred them back to the board
of 'guardians. On last Tuesday the question was
again brought under the notice of the board of guar-
dians, and a second time they decided that they had not
the power to interfere. The question, therefore, that
he. (Mr. Hill) wished to ask was this—whether the order
ittiioncoluncil lately promulgated had conferred any addi-
tional on the Board of Health, the guardians of
tjahemou.:,t:artdhie:awgiagstrates, to enable them to suppress
the nuisance which, as one case of cholera had occurred
aOeoOt/ those. thebecoming most alarming.
Mr. Edwards, vestryman,a said that, in the year of
cholera, it had
parish of Lambeth 2,0001. for
doctors,
childrenors
and 2
of ,
since for the support of thd widows
d
who had died of cholera, and this
he attributed m a great
out the sanitary laws,
to the negligence in car-
ryingof
the
ee alseswoecroarugep,laainneodooff
theth present disgraceful Mate

i
- ..