The Sun.
London, England, 1854-11-28 00:00:00

MARKET INTELLIGENCE.

(Prom the London New Prixt Current of this day.)
SUGAR.—The demand has been moderate at about the
previous rates. A cargo of yellow Ilavannah afloat has
been sold at 21s 6d for Belgium, No. 101 quality being
rather dearer. Pernam and Rio Grande are also dearer.
The quantity of British Plantation landed last week at
the East and West India Docks was 44 hhds and 5 barrels,
there were taken for home consumption 1,362 hhds, 190
tierces, 623 barrels. The stock in the same places is 17,919
hhds, 2,613 tierces, 4,039 barrels.
COlTEE.—Native Ceylons are quiet ; about 300 bags
good quality have been sold at 56s per cwt.
Rum has remained quiet. The quantity landed last
week at the East and West India Docks was 706 puns, 254
hhds. There were taken for home consumption 270 puns,
27 hhds ; and exported 73 puns, 38 hhds. The stock in
the same places is 12,016 puns, 2,920 hhds.
RlCE.—Vlore demand owing to the duty being taken off
in Belgium, and rather stiffer rates are demanded ; about
3,000 bags Bengal have been sold at 16s to 163 0,1 for mid
to good.

SALTPETRE.--The market is quiet-. At auction 3,319
bags Bengal were mostly taken in at 26s for 5 per cent, at
23s 641 to 24s fur 101 to 121 per cent refraction.
SPlCES.—Pepper 2,258 bags Singapore were taken in at
4.1,,1 to 40 ; 250 Penang were also taken in at 41d, and 120
Malabar sold at 4id to 41d per lb.
CoTToN was dull, and there are no sales to report.
TEA.—The market is quiet, pending the delivery of the
Overland letters.

TALLOW.—P.Y.C. is dull at 66s for old, and 663 3d to
665. 6ci for new.

COURSE OF EXCI
Arn5terdam............ 11 15 4
Ditto, three months .. 11 17%
Botterdam ............ 11 1.7!
Brussels .............. 25 35
llamburgh .......... 13 6
Altona • • • • • • • • •• •• • • ••
Paris ........ ..•• .... 25 15

LANGE.—Tms DAY.
Gibraltar .. .. • • •
Leghorn .. •• • ..... • • 30 45
Genoa ...... •• .. 25 5234
Milan .. .••.•• • • • • •
Venice .•••• . • . ..
Naples ........
Palermo .... .••• • • • • 1315 i
Messina ... ... 132
Lisbon ..
Oporto .. ..
Rio Janeiro ..... .......

Ditto, three months .. 25 371,x.'
Marseilles ............. 25 40
Bourdeaux ... • ........
Fr ankfort-on-M aine .• 118%
Berli❑
Vienna ........ .. • • • . 12 40
Trieste • • • • .... 12 40
Petersburg ...........• 3514
Madrid ............... 50%
Cadiz ..........
Barcelona ••••.• • • • • ••
Seville.. .........

Buenos Ayres.... . • ..
New York, 0 days' sight
Philadelphia' ...

PRICES OF BULLION, PER OZ.
Foreign Gold in Bars £3 17 9
Portugal Gold Coin .. 0 0 0
Mexican Dollars .... 0 5 01A
New Dollars .... •• 0 0 0
Silver iu bars . .... 0 5 Iy,

LAW INTELLIGENCE.—Nora. 27.

EQUITY COURTS.
(Before Vice-Chancellor Sir John Stuart.)
HERTZ V. THE UNION BANK OF LONDON.
Mr. Bacon and, Mr. Greene appeared for the plaintiff,
in support of I. motion for an injunction to restrain the
defendants from erecting upon their premises any build-
ing of a g'.'eater height than the elevation at the same
point of the old buildings as they lately stood thereon,
so as 440 darken, obscure, or impede the light, and air
heretofore enjoyed by the plaintiff. The plaintiff carried
o•A business as a diamond merchant and picture dealer,
at 32, on the west side of Argyle-street, Regent-street,
and obtained a lease of the house in January last, for
21 years. It appeared that the defendants proposed to
erect a party wall next adjoining the plaintiff's premises,
of such a height as to obstruct the admission of light
into the room, in which the plaintiff carried on his trade,
the windows of which were ancient lights, which the
plaintiff contended would interfere with his carrying on
his business.

Mr. Maline and Mr. Eddis appeared for the defendants,
and opposed the motion.

The Vice-Chancellor said the plaintiff complained that
a light which he had shown to be an ancient light was
about to be obstructed by the building of the defendants,
and had proved that the smallest diminution of light
would be a serious injury to him in his business. On
behalf of the defendants, it was insisted that this was an
ancient light in a dwelling-house, and that upon the
authorities they were entitled to obscure it. But he
thought that those 'authorities had no application to the
present case, which was that of threatened injury to
trade. The plaintiff was entitled to the protection
sought, and there must be an injunction against the
defendants as asked.

ALLEN V. WILLIAMS.
The defendant in this case was a perpetual curate in
the diocese of Manchester, and by an order of the court
he was directed to pay a sum of money to the plaintiff.
This he did not do, and a sequestration, dated the 11th
November, 1854, was issued, to which a return was
made, that the defendant had no lay property. Under
these circumstances application was made to the court,
and the motion was directed to stand over.
Mr. Munro, the Registrar, now handed up to the
court the case of " Norton v. Pritchard," before the
late Vice-Chancellor of England from the Registrar's
Book, B. 1844, fol. 1,568, where a sequestration was
issued to the Bishop of Norwich after a return made by
the Commissioners of Sequestration that the defendant
was a beneficed clergyman in his diocese.
Mr. T. F. White appeared, and asked for an order
in the terms of the order referred to by Mr. Munro.
The Vice-Chancellor said he thought that upon the
authority of the case cited the order asked was of
'Curse ; but his Honour would express no opinion as to
the effect of the order upon the statute of the 13th of
Elizabeth, 0. 20, which prohibited a clergyman from
charging his benefice.

1 INSOLVENT DEBTORS' COURT.
(Before Mr. Commissioner Phillips.)
IN RE ROBERT GEORGE WILLIAM WEAR.
This insolvent, who had been the managing director
of a company called " The Amazon Life Assurance," ap•
plied under the Protection Act. A creditor named
Hogg opposed in person on two bills for loans granted,
for which he charged at the rate of " thirty per cent."
Mr. Commissioner Phillips said the law now allowed
any rate of interest, but whether the :aw would allow
such a complaint was another question;
The complainant said it was a losing matter.
His Honour recommended the creditor to leave off
the trade. He considered the interest enormous. Such
persons were their own insurers, and this court would
not protect them.

_
A day was named for the final order, and a married
woman, who appeared to oppose, was told that her hus-
band could appear on the next occasion.

IN RR JA.3IES RICHARDSON.
This insolvent, a coal dealer, was opposed by Mr.
Dowse, and supported by Mr. Reed.
The insolvent petitioned as a trader owing less than
3001. It was elicited that he had been sued by a coal
merchant in (a county court for 501., the hizhest
amount, when the claim was nearly 3001. In the
schedule the debt was 501., but had the original amount
been inserted, the insolvent would have owed beyond
the amount allowed by the Protection Act. The ques-
tion was, whether the remainder of the debt was waived,
and it was proved to be the case, on which the court
heard the petition. Ultimately the case was adjourned
for further evidence.