The Sun.
London, England, 1853-05-27 00:00:00

MANNING THE NAVY.

Admiral WALCOTT moved an address to the Crown for
copies of the scheme of Lieutenant Brown, R.N. (referred
to in page 7), also of the scheme of Rear-Admiral Sir
Charles Napier, K.C.B. R.N. (referred to in page 29), and
of Mr. C. H. Pennell (referred to in page 30), all alluded to
in the report on the subject of the manning of the Royal
navy recently laid on the table of this house by her Ma-
jesty's command. The gallant officer observed, that this
subject was regarded with great interest both by the naval
profession and the country generally, owing to the growing
repugnance which was felt to the system of impressment.
The schemes to which the motion referred had all been con-
sidered peculiarly worthy of attention, and as it was most
important that effectual provision should be made for man-
ning the navy, and for its maintenance in a state of effici-
ency, he was desirous that the house should have the fullest
possible means of forming a sound judgment on the subject.
It appeared that the actual number of men employed in
British registered ships was in 1851, 175,000, including
53,600 protected from impressment. About 80,000 men
were left available for service, and of this number it was
estimated that not more than 21,000 would be found in the
United Kingdom at any one time. He hoped there would
be no objection to the production of the documents for
which he moved.

Sir J. GRAHAM could assure the gallant Admiral that
ample opportunity would be afforded for the discussion of
this very important question. It would be his (Sir J.
Graham's) duty, in a very short time, in consequence of
the report to which the motion of the hon. and gal-
lant officer referred, to move for leave to introduce two
bills founded upon that report, and an opportunity would
then be given for the most full discussion. Two of the
documents referred to in the motion were already in the
possession of the house. The report of Lieutenant Brown
was contained in paper No. 84, presented February 18,
1852, which contained a great deal of information on the
subject. Another document to which the gallant officer
referred was a paper founded upon the opinion of Sir C.
Napier, to which reference was also made in that report.
The document in question was a bill introduced by Sir C.
Napier in 1848, when ho was a member of that house.
That bill did not, he believed, go beyond a second reading.
It was, however, upon the records of the house, among
the bills which had been introduced, and it would be
found in the library of the house. There remained,
therefore, only the third document, which was a confi-
dential report, prepared by a clerk in the Admiralty, who
had officiated as secretary to the commission. He was a
very able gentleman, certainly, but he was not a pro-
fessional gentleman ; and he was sure the gallant officer
would see that it was hardly consistent to move for the
production of a confidential report which had been drawn
up by a clerk in the Admiralty.
The motion was withdrawn accordingly, and the house
adjourned at a few minutes before 2 o'clock.

PARLIAMENTARY DIVISION.

HOUSE OF COMMONS.-MAT 26.

( From the Votes and Proceedings of the House of
Commons.)
CHURCH RATES.

Question proposed—" That the words, ' this house do
resolve itself into a committee to consider whether Church
Rates should not be abolished, and provision made for the
charges to which such rates are at present applicable—from
pew rents, and from the increased value which inquiries
instituted by authority of the Crown have shown may be
derived, -limier better management, from Church lands and
property,' bo added to the word That' in the original
question." Amendment proposed to the said proposed
amendment, to leave out from the word " house" to the end
of the said proposed amendment, in order to add the words,
"is of opinion that the present mode of levying Church
Rates for the repair of the edifices, and for the service of the
Church of England, shall henceforth cease, as by law has
been already accomplished in Ireland ; and that the amount
required for the service of the Church should in future be
supplied from the funds belonging to the Church of Eng-
land, and at the disposal of the Ecclesiastical Commis-
sioners," instead thereof :—Question proposed, " That the
words proposed to be left stand part of the said proposed
amendment :"—Amendment, by leave, 'withdrawn :
Words added :—Main question, as amended, put, " That
this house do resolve itself into a committee, to consider
whether Church Rates should not be abolished, and pro-
vision made for the charges to which such rates are at
present applicable—from pew rents, and from the in-
creased value which inquiries instituted by authority of
the Crown have shown may bo derived, under better
management, from Church lands and property :—Ayes,
172 ; Noes, 220.

MINORITY-AYES, 172.

Adair, H. Fitzroy, Henry Mullings J. Randolph
Aglionby, 11. A. Foley, J. 11. Muntz, G. F.
Alcock, Thomas Forster, Charles Murphy, F. S.
Anderson, Sir James Forster, J. Murrough, J. P.
Bailey, C. Fortescue, C. Norreys, Lord
Baines, M T. Fox. W. J. Oliveira, B.
Ball,•Edwatd Gat dner, It. Osborne, Ralph
Barnes, T. Geach, Charles Paget. Lord George
Bass, M. T. Gibson, Thomas M. Pechell, Sir G.
Beaumont, W. B. Glyn, George Carr Pellatt, A.
Bell, James Goderlch, Viscount Phillimore, J.
Berkeley, H.' Goodman, Sir George Phinn, T.
Berkeley, Craven F. Gower, F. L. Pigott, F.
Bethell, Richard Greene, J. Pilkington, J.
Biddulph, It. M. Crowson. Samuel Potter, It.
Biggs. William Grenfell, C. Price, W. P.
Blackett, J. F. B. Grey, Sir 0. Ramsdell, Sir J.
Bland, L. Grosvenor, Lord R. Ricardo, 0.
Bonham-Carter, JoLn Hadfield, George Robartes, T. J. A.
Bouverie, E. Hall, Sir. Benjamin Russell, F. C.
Bower, G. Hamner, Sir J. Sadleir, J.
Boyle, Colonel nestle, Alexander Scholeneld, W.
Brady, John llastie, Archibald Scobell, Captain
Brand, H. Ileadiam, T. E. Scully, F.
Bright, John Heywood, James Seymour, 11. D.
Brocklehurst, John Heys orth. L. Seymour, W. D.
lit otherton, Joseph Hiudley, Charles Shelley, Sir J. V.
Brown, William Howard, W. G. . Sheridan, lt. B.
Bulkeley, Sir R. B. Hume, Joseph Smith, J.
Butler, Charles Hutchins, E. Smith, M. Tucker
Byng, G. 11. Charles Butt, William Smith, Rt. lin. It.
Cavendish, C. C. Keating, H. S. Strickland, Sir G.
Chambers, Montagu Kennedy, T. Strutt, E.
Chambers, Thomas Keogh, William Stuart, Lord D.
Chaplin, W. J. Kershaw, James Sullivan, M.
Cheetham, John King, P. J. Swift, It
Clifford, li. Kinnaird, A. F. Talbot, C. R. M.
Cobbett, J. Morgan Langston, J. 11. Tanered, Henry Wm.
Cobden, Richare Langton, 11. G. Thicknesse, It. A.
Coffin, W. Laslett, W. Thompson, George
Collier, Robert P. Layard, A. H. Thornely, T.
Craufard, E. li. J. Lee, W. Towueley, C.
Crossley, P. Lowe, R. Vivian, J. 11.
Currie, Itaikes Lucas, F. Vivian, Henry H.
Dashwood, Sir G. H. Me2ann, James Wall, Charles Baring
Dl vett, Edward Macgregor, John Wahnsley, sir J.
Duffy, C. (1. Maguire, J. F. • Warner, Edward
Duke, Sir J. ' Martin, John Whalley, G.
Duncen, G. Massey, W. N. Wilkinson, W. A.
Daucombo, T. Meagher, Th 0114113 Wilcox, LI.
Dunlop, A. Mien, Edward Whittington, Sir T. E
Ellice, Rt. lion. E. Milligan, Robert Wise, A.
Ellice. E. Mills, T. Wyvill, M.
Esmond°, J. 111 i tier, W. M. E.
E wart, William Mitchell, T. A.
Fergus, John Molatt, 0.
Ferguson, Joseph Moleswortle Sir W.
Fitzgerald, J. 1). Morris, 1).
Fitzgerald, Sir J. Idoatyle B. M.
MAJORITY—NOES, 220.
Arland, Sir T. Goitele-Sir*E. Noel, lion. G.
A'Cottrt, O. Granath, Sir James North, Colonel
Adslerley, C. Graham, Lord M. W. Oakes, .1. H. P.
A rehdall, Captain Granay, Marquis Ossolston, I ord
Arkwright, G. Creaves, Ed A ard Pa, et, Lord Alfred
Atherton, Wm. Greene% Gilbert Pakington, Sir John
Bagge, W. Greene, T. Painter, It.
Benito, G. Grogan, E. Palmerston, Visconti
Baring, Sir F. Grosvenor, Earl Parker, It. T.
Baring, T Guernsey, Lord Peel, Sir It.
Barrington, Viscount Gwyn, Howel Peel Frederick
narrow, Win. H: Hare, Robert B. Peel, Colonel
Bennet, Philip Halsey, T. Pennant, Col.
Bentinck, Geo. P. Hamilton, (leo. A. Percy, J. William
Blair, Colonel Ilan bury, lion. C. Phalipps, J. 11.
Bolder°, Colonel Ha court, 0. 0. 1 hillintore, It.
Booker, Thos. 'Wm. Harcourt, (201. Portal, ?Melville
Booth, Sir It. Hardinge, Charles S. Portman, 1111. W.
Branaston, 'V: W. Ilayes, Sir E. Pritchard, J.
itrockinati, E. D. Ileathcoate, Sir 0. Itepton, G.
Brooke, Sir A. lieathcote, Gilbert H. Robertson, P. F.
Brace, Lord E. Heneage, G. 11. W. Bolt, P.
Bruce, H. A. Heiteage, 0. F. Rumbold, C. E.
Buck, Lewis W. Herbert, Sidney Russell, Lord J.
Buller, Sir J. Y. Hervey. Lord Alfred Russell, F. W.
Burgit.ey, Lord Ilildyard, Robert C. Sanders, (1- .
Burroughes, Hem y N Hottiain, Lord Sawle, C. B. G.
Butt, I. Hughes, W. B. Seahain, Lord.
Cairns, H. 111‘Calmont Milne. W. F. Seymer, H. K.
Campbell, Sir Arch. Ingham, Robert Seymour, Lord.
Cardwell, llon. E. Inglis, Sir R. It. Stain, Sir W.
Cavendish, George Jertnyn, Earl Smollett, A.
Cayley, E. S. Johnstone, Sir J. Sonterset,Captaln
Cearterls, F. Jolliffe, Sir W. G. H. Sotheron, T. H.
Chelsea, Viscount Jones, Captain Spooner, Richard
Chohnoudeley, Ld. 11. Jones, D. Stafford, A.
Christopher, It. Adam 'Kelly, Sir F. Staftbrd, Marquis
Clive, R. H. Kendall, N. Stanhope, J. ii.,
Clive, It. Kitiescote, R. N. F. Stanley, Lord
Cobbold, J. Chevalier Kirk, William Stephenson, Robert'
Cocks, Thomas S. Knatchbull, Wm. F. Stirling, W.
Coles, 11. Beaumont Kntghtley, Rainald Stuart 11.
Colville, O. It. Lacon, Sir E. Taylor, Colonel
Coote, Sir C. II Leiran, It. DI. Thes.ger, Sir If.
Corry, Henry Lowry Langton, W. G. Tollemache, John
Cowper, W. Lawley, F. C. Trollope, Sir J.
Davies, D. A. S. Lennox, Lord 11. G. Turner, C.
Denison, E. Lewisham, Ld Tyler, Sir G.
Dent, J. Liddell, 11. G. Vance, J.
Derine, Sir E. Lindsay, Colonel Vane, Lorl A.
Disraeli, B. Lockhart, W. Vansittart, G. IT.
Duckworth, Sir J. Long, W. Vivian, J. Ennis
East, Sir J. Lovaine, Lord Vyvyan, Sir It.
Egerton, Sir Philip Lowther, Colonel Waddington, H.
Egerton, W. Lytton, Sir E. G. Walcot, Adni.
Egerton. E. Macarteney, G. Walpole, S. H.
Elliot, J. E. Mackie, J. Walter, John
Euston, Earl Macgregor, James West, Frederick B.
Farnham, E. Basil Maddock, Sir H. Whatinan, J.
Ferrer, James Manners, Lord G. Whitbread, Samuel
Fellowes, Edward Manners, Lord J. Whitmore, 11.
Ferguson, Sir Robert Masternian, John Wickham, 11. W.
Fitzgerald, W. R. S. Maxwell, Hon. J. P. Wigram. L. T.
Floyer, John Men'', Sir Henry Wood, Sir C.
Fol ett, B. Spencer 3llles, W. Woods!, B.
Forester, Col. 1111chell, W. Wortley, Jas. Stuart
Forster, Sir G. Moncreiff, James Wrightson, Sir Wm.
Frewen, C. H. Montgomery, Sir G. Wyndham, General
Gallwey, Sir W. P. Moody, C. A. Wynne, %V.
Galway, Viscount Morgan, C. It. Verse, Eliot T.
George, John Mundy William Young, Sir T.
Gladstone, William N efts, Lord TELf.ERP.
Gladstone, Captain Newark, Viscount Hayter, Hon. W.
Goddard, Ambrose L. Newdegate, C. Berkeley, Grenville

TELLERS.

Clay. Sir William
Peto, S.

LONDON, FRIDAY, MAY 27, 1853.

Information received up to the 19th instant,
pronounces one or two recent rumours to have
been rather premature in reference to the situation
of affairs in Constantinople. Instead of hastily
quitting that capital on his return to St. Peters-
burgh, it appears that Prince MENSCHIKOFF had
endeavoured to temporise still further with the
DIVAN, seeing that, immediately on the rejection
of his ultimatum, he had employed every device
to open new negotiations. How far this last
desperate effort to retrieve the position of his Im-
perial Master, the Russian AUTOCRAT, is likely to
prove successful, may be readily conjectured, we
conceive, under existing circumstances. Conces-
sions are not exceedingly probable on the part of
the Sublime Porte, now that REDSCHID PACHA has
been once more installed at the head of the Fo-
reign Department of the Turkish Administration.
It is tolerably well known that that eminent
statesman, the most gifted and energetic of all the
political advisers of the SULTAN, was some time
back thrust from power by the intrigues of the Em-
peror NIMIOLAS through his Ambassador at the Court
of ABD-UL-MEDJID. And although we believe that
REDSCHID PACHA is altogether too noble and mag-
nanimous in his temperament to avail him-
self of an opportunity of indulging in a petty,
because personal, act of retaliation, we cannot at
the same time remain blind to the undoubted pro-
bability that his sentiments towards the policy of
the CZAR are anything but the complacent senti-
ments dictated by the feelings of friendship. We
do not say that he owes a grudge to the Cabinet
of St. Petersburgh. We say more—that he is
bound by the force of his patriotism, by the wis-
dom of his experience, and by the promptings of
his conscientious convictions, to withstand by
every means in his power the sinister advances
made by the Russian EMPEROR upon the Euro-
pean dominions of ABD-UL-MEDJID. So long as
REDSCHID PACHA continues in office at Constanti-
nople, so long may the SULTAN rest assured that
the CZAR will find himself opposed at every
turn by all the energies of the Turkish Govern-
ment. Happily the councils of the Divan in this
respect are supported, not merely virtually, but
openly and practically, by the representatives of
the majority of the crowned heads of Christen-
dom. Foremost, indeed, among these, of course,
are the British and French Ambassadors. It is
not any longer that the question at issue is one
which the Court of St. James's regards with
simple indifference. The difficult and entangled
negotiations carried on for a long while in refer-
ence to the Holy Places have for a considerable
time past been definitively settled to general
satisfaction. The memorable firmans granted by
the SULTAN during the course of last April set
that matter at rest by a series of amicable and
conciliatory arrangements. What is being battled
for now at Constantinople is not the question as
to who shall be the custodian of the keys
or cupolas of Jerusalem. It is not as
to who shall take precedence in conserving
the shrine of the Blessed VIRGIN. It is not
as to which order of Priesthood should be
allowed to have prior claims to the guardianship
of the Holy Sepulchre. It is simply the question
as to who shall be Sovereign of the European do-
minions of Turkey—the SULTAN or the AUTO-
CRAT ? It is the question as to which of these
two Potentates shall henceforth be regarded as
the Master of Constantinople.
MENSCHIKOFF is striving to gain an advantage
for the Emperor NICHOLAS, in violation of the
rights of nations, in defiance of the force of
treaties, with a flagrant disregard of the common-
est principles of right or wrong : but in this en-
deavour he finds himself suddenly opposed by the
genius and the patriotism of REDSCHID PACHA,
resolved at all hazards to maintain the integrity
of the Empire of ABD-UL-MEDJID. It so happens
that at this identical crisis the imperial
councils of France and England are
presided over by Sovereigns not less reso-
lute in the preservation of what is called the
Balance of Power in a state of equilibrium than
ambitious of preserving with a strong arm the
blessings of a prolonged and honourable tran-
quillity. The development of a lawless and in-
satiable ambition on the part of the AUTOCRAT will
never be tolerated either by VICTORIA or NAPOLEON.
Of this, during a long time, the SULTAN has evi-
dently felt himself satisfactorily assured. His
principal support, in case of any instant emergency,
would indubitably be
in the British and the
French Plenipotentiaries. However threatened

the Sublime Porte may have been by the audao
of the Court of St. Petersbnrgh, it has all aleir';
placed an implicit reliance in the justice, and ill tl'
honour, and in the resolution of the allied Cour;
of St. James's and the Tuileries. Notwithstandil/'
nus'
the military forces collected together en the
ari
sian frontiers—notwithstanding, in fact, the
of
lie
time -armament assembled on the waters 1 t
of
Black Sea—the Divan has ever felt confident
securing effectual assistance in the hour of dangeeli
through the simultaneous appearance of the Fr.eL,
and English Fleets at the mouth of the
da,nelles. That confidence, we rest assured,
never, on the arrival of a lamentable crisis,
eQ
to have been in any manner misplaced. Irur.„4
o
has a guarantee of this at once in the honur'oo,
in the interest of the French and English
vernments. •

with Thtehlle oiunsteeroefstiCnogmamnodnsizs)or
Church Rates last night that no time re
to dispose of the Income Tax Bill. That s
obJes;
therefore, remains for this evening, when w., not,
There 1' f•
pose it will finally be disposed of.
bees sill
tgaonfttliglY•ue°3ol;ll:loeiicif
however, much hope for those who have
_O3O
fering under the iniquitous system that 0.0
for eleven years. Not a single person 113:00t
given notice of bringing forward an an.!bie 511 J
for the purpose of obtaining a more equal test
impartial assessment, or even the slign of avi
proximation to justice by the recognitieura,
distinction, however trifling, between Pe Gentle
and precarious income. One Honourable
cooti
man, the representative of an Irish
300
tuency, while evincing a creditable
tire on
to improve the details of the inessoi;jo
points exclusively relating to the sister 00;tiO
has given notice of motion, that " the Ow
to persons whose respective incomes are 't dal)!
1501. a year, shall be continued in res Pee%
duties chargeable under schedules P andbie aO,
also "in respect of any duties charger' •01
any income, stipend, or emolument, recel of Oaf
Clergyman, Minister, or Religious Teaeher,aiti.
denomination, from or in right of anY
cal benefice, preferment, or in respect 01;ajoier.
pation as such Minister or Relig,ions
We thank Mr. BUTT for this excellent Pr_inigt7 al J`'
It is true that it affords but an infinjYyrgree
gree of relief ; that it does not in all 'Leo
nefit the numerous sufferers with ineelli-bot
ing from 1501. to 3001. per annum' fir;
would keep the collector from the Li,*
t 1
those whose positions are, of all e',-nott
most difficult to maintain ; it would Pre;
impost from touching on the domains e;1010
from including in its operation men tho oletr
varying from 21. to 31. per week, or,—Gosr.,
toiled and under-paid ministers of waes„,_Aelfriit
whose scanty remuneration is totally A
to maintain the position which an educate-f
men should assume, or to the eXCreieii°o
Christian charities befitting his sacred e';ll'`,
which the sick and the destitute are aserej)sJ
to consider almost as a right ; for it is D'oper,
able fact, that it is not to the rich and 1/411,t
pluralist the wealthy incumbent-', ,500
afflicted turn with almost a certainty of
but to those who must curtail their 074,0'
forts—we had almost said necessarlie;a;
who must purchase by their own privily
expensive luxury of doing good. 33,1%tier„
especially do we thank the Honourable
for the universality of his proposition.
sccori;
no exclusive privilege intended ; ne ~,r 7 1
favour to one at the expense of his brotll2'te'o:ll
Burr's amendment comprehends the Minis
Religious Teachers of every denominationv
the Roman Catholic as the Protestant,
senter as the State Churchman. Thisilloi
should be ; and most sincerely do we 11°1):If
,
will insure the success of the amendinee'',oe,
could anticipate any degree of independea;
part of those who at one time refusedtri
themselves to the chariot wheels, or of '`
their own convictions at the behest,
Minister, we should have no don') t yid
the result. As it is, we await se
patiently. If it should be in off;
with justice and expediency, we ellai:ddyr
for the sake of those who have esrad, Jr,
undue responsibility. If, on the other w;
Chancellor of the Exchequer shoal"
triumph—if "might should once inore,ll)4Y
over right "—we shall comfort ourselves,:ed
consideration, that the more atrocious tl'",;r 11:‘,
the sooner we may anticipate its overthr°'
de° 4
when the " iniquity" is thoroughly tnihoo`
and the full extent of the burden h I,osi
dured, the pressure from without wil'iod
irresistible, and the law must be relhn
materially improved, even long beforea,
years' lease, to which the obedient Degotlef,,i'
about to affix its seal, shall have expired. res 9
circumstances, and whatever may be tlie)if.
the proceedings, we willingly render teedli
the approbation to which he has enabler
titled himself for his judicious and 0111 s
position.
its 1° 1'11;5?
Mr. BLACKETT, too, merits thank Do if
positions, by which due allowances are ifiptel' me
for the bad debts, and losses by bank'itioo;n!
solvency, or the acceptance of coniPespro,
which every trader is liable, and ills° of Ploi
derate allowance for the wear and tea lye
nery employed in any manufacture. to etre'
gladly have seen the allowance extenuere
kind of trade or professional expenditu- it 'l4' it
viously recognised ; but, even as it 15!oas r
if sanctioned, remove some very seri,nieoP
antes, and materially improve the s' rp eIV4
would, however, be letting in
"the s vOO,l io
the wedge," and would lead to an err° .Dit'
e5l" 604
that any regard to justice would be *fr. lir
I P' .
the assessment—a precedent w-he o'l'
STONE will unquestionably resist wile/11010i
powers. Well, NOUS verrons, time willineod fo'
manufacturers of the West Riding, the ,0,
chester, will think of no allowance be l'
ano tiN 0 10'
1111
bad debts or depreciated machinery'. a
13
perhaps arrive when Messrs. Conni—fornie);to",
will rejoin the ranks of the Fiscal Re and,
which they have so recently secede-',ivatio
veteran JOSEPII HUME, head the c:ost
industrious classes against the
tiof 4,OiP
and iniquitoUs instance on recur
that
legislation." At present, all r
for the friends of the people, fe
recognise the justice of the Prette aPtoo
01
every new law should tend to orootloo4,
of " the many," that " the greates' that sj
greatest number is a sacred pritiLciellal°islat°l:efr4:iejl';
never be lost sight of by our :oh 040.4
enter their earnest protest against '„ireacly
based on injustice, and (as we havei;dort
exhibiting in all its parts a flag
nibs/ lei
the commonest principles of „tie as j
almost as demoralising and inlP°l/I‘,ster
tO r
just and inexpedient," and
alike the agitation which its oyere,
certain speedily to excite. r little p'0,41
but AirA
sent Parliament we have bide pfoviley
tation of relief. But We c the 0,1)
It 0.1
Whatever may be the resu dissoin
Reform Bill, there must be '/Ps4o
have to render a strict accoun an ,en
year. Every Honourable Getnotafehrls 11; citro
oifnstehekeinlgncaomreenTeawxalwoifil cnoontfibdeenfoereg7
ot,tearria
(1(
A 11
„er
nrcheq- di, V
day of reckoning shall at length 11___3"
weathered the east winds of 3133'7 /oat vo
/MO iP
When a Chancellore
pd
ver"
ifieoeuldparyetyaksuinrge
toefmlpiis sell`
the sweets of Whitsuntide an tale the `l4-relv#o3
oae.i. of aro/
what with the near appr 40 0
Members get afraid of being au'
itch
er
no one likes, by delayin,, &in 'lO,Ol
spirit of obstructiveness begins_ountecl Kan,
ir
delay
of Cabinet measures, to signs e'
`log
Already Mr. DISRAELI giVe.s
ei to g'll4ot, ijV
of
thea
d her:n
and we fear that we are destroile 13acioaeji
bitter as well as the sweet at
.nropon
Mr. GLADSTONE'S schemes been r the
refitl,
rO clf-
Mr. DISRAELI'S befOTO Clirist 'los r
would surely have left whey© t P 164
logic has left him in argument b who 01.133 i ive°
ing to the old proverb, Inns,. to In j
Axonal', asr 2 '
between two stools.
already
from rateable property