The Sun.
London, England, 1865-09-15 00:00:00

HIE SUN, LONDON, FRIDAY EVENING, SEPTEMBER 15, lEEE,

GARNISHEES.

100
100
100
100
11,0

100
10
100
10
100

100
100
all
all
all
100
;00
100
16134
10u

'OSSE

all
100
lOb
2
100
100

190
100
100
10
100
100

43 t 5 1
1351 136 k

5 6

87 7,
71 73

111 113
48 49
7 8

133 135
151 752
126 29

91 93
64 67

64 66
45 47
28 42
105 tO7
1201 121 i
85 91
103 106
3s 40
124 :25
97 98
48 ZBJ

138! 134
3 PI
1271 128 k
98 AO i

62 63

1104 11l

68 69
iO3 104

261 37
-
10 lip
118 120

1i 2 p
76 78
11 12
151 151
60 62 ,

58 58
82 63
84 V 4
150 155
3 I p
104 106

49 51

ISIONS.

56 58

101 102
pr p
4 43
9 10

99 101
70 75
100 102
1014 1024
103 i 1113044
174 18

P 8 90
64 68
55 60
55 57
50 52
42 45
33 42
23 t 8
25 17
1031 1044,1
P
P

IT SECUR.

97 98
95 97
98 100
84 854
82 S 4
103 /05
106 108 1
108 110
106 108
3 105
10 111 ,

!03 105
!07 409
107 tO9
102 104
96 98
9) 101
93 95
90 01
103 105
86 86

98 100
102 103

106 108

491 1 9

15 I 2 li

6ff 5: 61

90 i
10 i
124 i I
97
ssl 9

129 i i lit
1281

64 31
111 1

1031

814

101
101!

104} 4

13;
111*

1011 100}

ITtES.

1021

109 k

LAW INTELLIGENCE—This Day.

LORD MAYOR'S COURT.
(Before the Recorder and a Common Jury.

IMPORTANT ATTACHMENT CASE: HOWARTH V. HISLOP.-
THE SOUTH-EASTERN RAILWAY COMPANY OP PORTUGAL,

This was an attachment case of very great importance
to shareholders in railway companies, plaintiff seeking to
attach certain dividends alleged to be due to the defendant
as a shareholder in the South-Eastern Railway Company
of Portugal.

Mr. Talfourd Salter appeared for the company, Mr. Phil-
brick representing the plaintiff.
It appeared that the defendant was a holder of certain
bonds which had been issued, and it was set up on the
part of the plaintiff that the company had £2lO in hand to
the use of the defendant.

Mr Mackenzie, the secretary to the company, was called,
and stated that there was money in the Bank to the credit
of the defendant.

His Lordship asked if there was any answer as to £2lO ?

Mr. Salter said there was a special arrangement between
defendant and the company, under which the defendant
had to surrender certain shares and receive bonds. Now
the question was whether it could be said that so long as
the arrangement was not carried out defendant was entitled
to interest on the bonds.

His Lordship was of opinion that if the arrangement
were not carried out defendant would still be entitled to
the shares.

Mr. Salter thought that if the defendant broke his agree-
ment with the company it was clear he had forfeited all
claim to the dividends.

His Lordship did not see that defendant forfeited past
dividends and interest, whatever might be the case as to
those forthcoming. There was no answer as to £2lO, and
the jury would find a vordict for that amount.
Verdict for the plaintiff for £2lO.

SHERIFFS' COURT.
(Before Mr. Gibbous.)

FAMILY DEEDS OF COMPOSITION.-IMPORTANT DECISION.-

INGLE T. GREEN AND STANSBY.

This was a judgment summons, plaintiff suing a trades-
man of the City and defendant's agents, formerly of the
Poultry.
A clerk from the office of Mr. Chidley attended on behalf
of the defendant, and stated that they had executed a deed
of composition. _ _ _

His Honour—Have you the deed with you ?
Clerk—No, sir; but I have a copy, anti the deed is duly
registered. _ _

The copy of the deed was handed up to his Honour, who
asked plaintiff if he had called upon Mr. James Rawlings,
whose name was on the deed as trustee to the estate ?

Plaintiff—l know nothing of James Rawlings.
His Honour (to defendant's represeutative)—Have you
tendered plaintiff the composition due under this deed ?
_ _

Clerk—Not that I know of ; but the case only came into
the office a short time ago.

His Honour, after perusing the deed, said I do not like
the look of this deed at all. Here are three Greens and
two Rawlings. You know this does not look like a genuine
document. I find that the Greens and Rawlings figure in
this deed for very large sums. Hero is one Green down
for £5,000. Why, this appears to be quite a family
arrangement. Here is a Stansby down for £7BO and a
Rawlings for £4OO.
Clerk—Your Honour must remember that this deed has
been duly considered in the Court of Bankruptcy.

His Honour—l am quite sure that the Court of Bank-
ruptcy does not go into all these matters.
Clerk—Will you grant an adjournment ?

His Honour—Oh no. This is not the kind of case in
which I should feel at all inclined to grant an adjourn-
ment. Here I find a deed which is evidently a family
arrangement, and in which claims to the amount of
£lO,OOO are inserted by the Greens, Stanbys, and Raw-
lings. I shall commit the defendants for ten days, leaving
them to their remedy elsewhere.
Committed for ten days.

POLICE INTELLIGENCE.—This Day,

MARLBOROUGH-STREET.

TEE " BLOCKADE."—FURIOUS DRIVING.—William Thos.
Walker, cab-driver, badge 15,050, was charged before Mr.
Knox with being drunk and furiously driving a horse at-
tached to a Hansom cab, in Coventry-street.
Austin, 336 A, proved seeing the defendant, who was
drunk, driving a horse attached to a cab along Coventry-
street, about two o'clock this morning. The defendant
was galloping his horse, and flogging it at the sametime.
A constable was placed at the end of Oxenden-street to
carry out the orders of the commissioners of police prohi-
biting empty cabs passing into the Haymarket between
twelve and two, and the defendant, to avoid being stopped,
had, near Leicester-square, taken up one of the low fellows
the pretended
On the defendant reach-
iwnhgothhaneWghaibouteStetahreTtavymrk
erna,ient.picead
Piccadilly,
fare jumped out and ran away.
Mr. Knox said he supposed the defendant was trying to
force what was called the "blockade."
Austin said that was the case.

The defendant said he was not galloping his horse, and
could not do so in such a place as Coventry-street, and at
such a time.

Mr. Knox said he did not believe the defendant could
gallop his horse in such a place, but he might drive at such
a rate that he might drive over any one. Two months
ago a man was convicted at the Central Criminal Court of
manslaughter, and he believed sentenced to a long term
of imprisonment for killing a man through driving like the
protect the public, and not to have persons placed in
defendant had done. lie (the magistrate) was bound to
danger. He should fine the defendant 20s. ; or, in default,
14 days' imprisonment.