The Sun.
London, England, 1862-06-07 00:00:00

lIIE SUN, LONDC
......... _____
THE ITALIAN PAT .I.EIVT. . zini in early years, and has been too long away I?AILWAY INTELLIGENCE.
______._ - from his country, too long taken up by action rather ..e
(.From the Tim(' apondent.) than by thought, to have it in his power to see EAST ANGLIAN.
TURIN, JUNE 3. their unsoundness. A Wharncliffe meeting of this company was held
The members of '
.alian Parliament meet here Whether Garibaldi be or not privy to the absurd yesterday at the London Tavern to consider a bill
to-day from all e of the country, and some have movement attempted at Sarnico is a matter which to amalgamate the Eastern Counties, the East
even travelle erne in great haste from distant can, however, not be sifted without raising another Anglian, the Eastern Union, and the Norfolk Rail.
foreign pas They all came under a strong im- question, as to what extent Rattazzi and his Go-
way Companies,-Mr. L. Simpson in the chair.
pressiee et a great battle was to come off to-day vernment were a party to it. The CHAIRMAN explained that the directors had
in. al _louse of Deputies; but, as they drove in That Rattazzi had long and frequent conferences felt it their duty to oppose the bill, in order to com-
of the Carignano Palace, that auspicious white with Garibaldi, both immediately before and soon pel the Eastern Counties Company, who were the
,eg which has so often spared Italian legislators a after his taking the Government from Ricasoli's promoters of it, to carry out in good faith the terms
useless waste of oratorical gunpowder and the wan- hands, is known to all of us. It is extremely of the agreement made between the two companies
ton effusion of printing-ink was seen waving from natural that Rattazzi, who was bound to the French
and dated March 7, 1862.
Mr. BAXTER, the solicitor, read the heads of the
the battlements. In all probability, there is to be I Emperor not to press the Roman question with that
battle at all, importunity which had led to the downfall of his bill, and explained the clauses so far as they affected
The encounter was to arise in consequence of some predecessor, had pointed out Venetia to Garibaldi the interests of the East Anglian Company. He
interpellations by the Sicilian deputy Crispi on the as a more honourable and favourable field for his had every confidence that a committee of the House
subject of the decree of the 27th of March last, con- exertions. The very direction taken by Garibaldi of Lords would do them justice, and insist on the
cee fling the admission of Garibaldian officers into in his tour towards the frontier of the Mincio and Performance of the agreement.
the regular army. These in terpellations had been the Po, all along the Lombard and eEmilian pro- Mr. SCOTT objected to certain clauses in the bill,
put off from day to day previous to the recess, and, vinces, must have made it very evident to the King's by which the new company would be enabled, as
as they stood first and foremost in to-day's order of Government here that something was meditated lie read it, to purchase 6 and 7 per cent. preference
discussion, it was reasonably expected they would beyond the mere drilling and marshalling of volun- shares at par, which were now worth from 20 to 30
lead to a debate on the late affairs of Bergamo and teer marksmen. To be so near the spot which he per cent. premium.
Brescia-a debate which could hardly fail to dege- illustrated by his daring deeds against Urban in The CHAIRMAN explained that the directors had
nerate into a grand stormy field-day. 1859 ; to have before him those gorges of South done everything in their power to protect the inte-
Much light has lately been thrown upon those Tyrol which were the scenes of brave achievements rests of the company. They had obtained the best
affairs of Brescia and Bergamo, and as now the sub- by Italian Volunteers in 1848 ; and to resist the legal advice they could get, and were determined to
ject is tolerably clear in my mind, and seems to temptation of striking a blow for his Venetian act upon it to the best of their ability for the benefit
deserve to come to the universal knowledge of the brethren, was more, far more, than could be ex-
of the company. He concluded by moving a for-
English publics, you will perhaps be indulgent to me petted of the impulsive heart of Garibaldi, particu- mal resolution, approving the bill, subject to such
should the present letter exceed the ordinary limits, larly after the Sicilian and Calabrian campaign, had alterations as might be made by Parliament to
or should it even be followed up by further commu- persuaded both him and his friends and foes that carry into effect the agreement between the East
he was equal to any miracle, that his very name
nications on the same topic. Anglian Company and the Eastern Counties Com-
pany, dated March 7, 1862.
A short time before the downfall of the Ricasoli was a word of terror to the Austrian ; and particu•
Ministry, everybody in Italy was taken by surprise larly as Mazzini from London and some Hungarian Mr. SHAW, the deputy-chairman, seconded the
by the announcement that Garibaldi had quitted his exiles near him assured him of the co-operation of motion.
peaceful retreat of Caprera, and made his appearance the people and the unsteadiness of the army of Mr ' TAYLOR moved an amendment to the effect
at Genoa. It was stated at the time that he came by Austria herself. that the further consideration of the bill be ad-
Ricasoli's express invitation, as the Premier, having That the Government must needs suspect Gari- journed to Wednesday next.
reasons to he dissatisfied with the lukewarm and baldi, and that it was their duty either to Art with The amendment wee sejeetea, end the motion
grumbling support of the Moderate majority, was ee to disavow Laid thwart him was plain to proposed by the chairman was carried.
bent on throwing himself into the arms of that all men ; yet Rattazzi temporised and held his On the motion of Mr. MACLAURIN, the best thanks
Party of Action of which Garibaldi was thought to peace, partly on account of the fearful respon- of the meeting were voted to the directors for their
be the visible chief, as Mazzini is its invisible head. sibility he would incur had he come to an great exertions and attention to the interests of the
lam now in a position to tell you the positive open outbreak with the popular hero, partly also company.
facts as to what took place on that occasion, and, because he deemed it wise to follow Cavour's policy •••••••••• .....
as subsequent events were only the consequences of in 1860, to allow, that is, Garibaldi to have his own SOUTH YORKSHIRE.
that first step, you must allow me to be a little pro- way, and wink at his proceedings, in the certainty A Wharncliffe meeting of this company was held
fix in my retrospective recital. Senator Plezza, a that either he succeeded, and Government would yesterday, at Doncaster, to consider a bill to
deserving, honourable patriot, who always professed be sure to come in for the honours and profit of his authorise the company and the Manchester, Shef-
strong leanings to the Rattazzi interest, had an in- enterprise in Venetia, as Cavour did in the Two field, and Lincolnshire Railway Company to con-
terview with Baron Ricasoli, and asked him whether Sicilies, or he failed, and either perished in the tribute funds towards and to acquire the Trent,
there would be any objection to his sailing to Cap- enterprise, in which case they were rid of him for Ancholme, and Grimsby Railway ; and also a bill
rera with a mission to Garibaldi, to invite the ever, or he came back with the brand of unsuccess, to authorise the construction of a railway from the
General to stir up with his presence the spirit of the in which event he would cease to be formidable;' Bradford, Wakefield, and Leeds Railway at Wake-
Italian youth, who were now being organised into the popular hero would be hurled from his altar. field to Doncaster.
o eu
rl d
of seem,
such
h
rifle clubs--cocieta del tiro-a movement in which The French Emperor, however, it
he, Plena, greatly interested himself, and took a was aware of all the enormityanddawnMr. J. Parker presided.
On the motion of the CHAIRMAN, formal resolu-
most prominent part. Ricasoli answered,as a matter an undertaking. He saw that not merely a Bour-ue tions approving the bills were agreed to, and the
of course, that Garibaldi was a perfectly free agent, bon throne, as in 1860, but the peace of Europe, was
proceedings terminated.
and that the Government, for their own part, this time at stake, and Rattazzi received such hints
would put no restraint on his proceedings. Upon from Paris as he could not dare to disregard. MANCHESTER, SHEFFIELD, AND LlN-
that simple and very natural understanding Piazza A French journal, l'ltalie, which is published at COLNSHIRE.
accomplished his voyage, and came back with Turin, ventured upon a very bold statement that A special meeting of this company was held at
Garibaldi to the mainland.
the King and the King's Government, hearing of
Manchester yesterday, in compliance with the
standing orders of the House of Lords, to consider
It must be observed that, previous to Plezza's the projected expedition on the 10th at Naples, sent
mission, another gentleman had been with Garibaldi one of
the
officers of ordonnance, General Sanfront,
certain bills now before Parliament.
Mr.
at Caprera. This was the Marquis Trezzi, one of in great haste to Genoa and hence to Trescorre, near
BARKER presided, and moved a resolution
the King's aides-de-camp, who, as you may remem- Bergamo, Garibaldi's residence at the time
the where approving the Godley and Woodley Branch.
the two Generals had an interview early
ber, left the King's service in 1860 to join Garibaldi
Mr. WILES, Mr, FILDES, and other shareholders
in his Sicilian expedition. As A man enjoying the morning of the 12th, and where Garibaldi told the
confidence no less of his Sovereign than of the hero opposed the motion, on the ground that the present
undertaking, in conjunction with others to come
King's messenger that he knew nothing whatever -
of the meeting,
of Caps era, Trezzi threw out some hints to Geri-
alleged before movement, he showed great surprise the would too seriously increase the
baldi that the King was bent upon ridding himself at the communication he received, and at the in-
liabilities of the shareholders and lessen the security
of Ricasoli, and calling Rattazzi to the head of his tentions which were attributed to him, and sent of present preference holders.
Council, and gave him to understand that the object word to the King that "he would never compro-
After a long discussion the motion was negatived,
of his mission was to ascertain whether, in the miss him; that Italy needed the co-operation of
conquest of but it was understood that this decision would be
event of the contemplated change taking place, all its
political reversed upon a poll, which was demanded.
parties, and the
could only be achieved by the combined The next bill for approval was one for abandon-
Rattazzi could rely on the support of Garibaldi and Venetia
of the Party of Action. It seems that Garibaldi and unanimous efforts of the Hun • garians, of
ing a short portion of the Gersten and Liverpool
promised to countenance the new Cabinet, the brave troops of the Italian army, and his own
branch.
Garibaldi had no sooner landed at Genoa and volunteers; that he reckoned on the support of the Mr. MORTON and other shareholders opposed this
Been the King and most of the leading public men party of action in Venetia itself," and ended by abandonment, on the
ground that it must ultimately
at Turin than that coup d'etat took place which "giving his word of honour that he would not stir drive the company to greater expense to secure a
went by the name of Ministerial crisis. Ricasoli from the spot except to go to Caprera, whither he better route into a central part of Liverpool.
fell, Rattazzi rose to power, and on his first acces- would betake himself as soon as he could complete Mr. WITHERS took the opportunity of saying
Sia!i it was very evident that, although he tried to his cure" of the gout. that within the last few days the directors of this
conciliate all parties, he leant with all his weight As only four days later the same Garibaldi pub- company had made great progress in something
on the Party of Action. Garibaldi set out on his licly declared that the Sarnico expedition was done like a reconciliation of those differences with the
tour through Lombardy and the .Emilia, and, as by his express orders, his friends Crispi and Mordini Great Northern Company which had arisen out of
you will remember, little short of royal honours impugned the veracity of the Italie and of General
the Midland agreement.
were paid to him on his progress, not only by the Sanfront's assertions with respect to the results of The motion was negatived by a small majority,
people, but also and especially by all municipal and the Trescorre interview ; a lively paper war was
and a poll was demanded.
For the third bill, a bill for vesting the Oldham,
Government authorities. carried on between the ltalie, in the name of San-
Garibaldi's tour had no serious consequences for front and the Diritto, in that of Messrs. Crispi and Ashton, and Guide-bridge Junction in the Sheffield
a month or two; it merely led to demonstrations of Mordini, as Garibaldi's friends. A meeting, how-
and North-Western Companies, there was a majo-
a pacific character, and to the institution of those ever, took place between the parties last evening rity.
rifle clubs, which under proper management could the result of which appears in the Diritto of this The proceedings had not concluded when our re-
pave its moral no less than, eventually, its political morning, in which they declare that the explaua- port left.
--
advantages. All of a sudden, however, towards the tions taken place between them " leaves room
middle of last month, it was found out that some of for neither party to consider themselves offended or TRAFFIC RETURNS FOR THE WEEK.
the Garibaldian officers, who were thought to enjoy aggrieved." Garibaldi, also, who suddenly came to Miles Opened. Receipts.
the general's especial confidence, were preparing an Railways. ____........___
Turin last evening, had an interview with San- '1862. 1861. ' 1862. 1860
attack upon the Austrian frontier of the South Tyrol - ______ ____
, front, which is announced as " having been equally
£ £
a movement which from the place where the leaders satisfactory." Ballymena and Pert Rush.. - - -
appointed their first meeting went by the name of This is a concise and plain exposition of the facts. unties.... 136 136 2,037 1,978--
lfast and
Ches.vvn.. 49 394 591687
the Sarnico expedition (Sarnico is a mountain vii- I leave it for your readers to put upon it such a 1131rkd., Lane., s. June. -
Belfast and N. Co
- _
lage near tho lake of Iseo, in the province of Ber- construction as they think proper, or reserve to DirTstliolananddTgeeter 22 22 2,042 2,235
11 125 6,556 6,605
gamo, close to the border of the Tyrol). There on myself at the utmost to return to the subject Caledonian
____ _ 2l £l9l 15,460 15,995
se 225 327
the 14th about 200 persons were to assemble, and in my to-morrow's letter, adding a few minor &ertearniad°‘ll3tahi:c4lo"n orlon on
20 20 392 292
Cork, Blackrock, &Passage 6l 64 221 203
were to receive arms and ammunition for their un- details, which will throw additional light on the Cork and Youghal . 324 27 376 226
dertaking. The place, however, was militarily oc- subject, especially on the conduct of Govern- Cornwall 531 534 1,605 1,653
Deeside
17 375 389
cupied by the Government. The adventurers went ment, It must appear very clear to every one, Dublin & Belfast Junction 673 63 1,149 1,252
asunder, and two of their leaders, Nullo and Ambi- nevertheless, that Sanfront's own version of his Dublin and Drogyed!i. 63 63 1,754 1,739
W klow(m.kingst.), 484 404 2,113 2,564
Dundalk and Enniskillen I 115 130 1,809 1,488
Yeti, both of Bergamo, were arrested and taken pri- interview with Garibaldi was neither retracted by
Boners to Brescia. There were tumults at Bergamo himself nor substantially refuted by Crispi and Dundee Dundee,
on the part of the movers of the expedition, who Mordini on any plausible evidence. No doubt the tja&tuAnnglsian
tie Nrfk. &E.Union 413iP 4994 24 9761 25 te3 clamoured for the liberation of the two arrested language Garibaldi held on the 12th is in sheer
16 th , Edinburgh,oliEdinburgh'and dlasgow
85 3,478 3,903
officers; but there the rioters were soon appeased contradiction with his own declaration of theyPdeerru,neseßounnd.e.e. tg
30 290 267
by the assurance that the prisoners were not, and, as it seems utterly incredible that the General Furness
& South-Western 1834 11 8,857'5 Ng there, but at Brescia. In the latter place a part of would stoop either to deliberate and wanton false- Great Northern 330 330 21,771 23,562
, Great North of Scotland
her .population made an attempt to break into the hoods, or even equivocation, we must take it ror fit.Soutim. & Westn.(lrind.) 329 329 8,3 4 8,187
Great Westcrn 9644 Igt 58,535 56,569
111SOn where the two officers had been shut up. The granted that he had, up to the 10th, been left ut- Inverness & Aberdeen Juno 55 980 971 Government authorities endeavoured to pat them terly in the dark by his agents of the plots they Irish South-Eastern 25 25 221 285
erYorkphire 3954 3951 30,289 37,665
offoffbY gentle means, but an encounter took place, in were hatching almost under his very eyes, or that Lancashire
Leominster and Kington
which the rioters were beaten back with the loss of he only became acquainted with their plans after Limerick and Ennis... 241 241 210 /89
Limerick and Foynes VI :gl 117 133
three
or four dead and about tea more or less Brie- the 12th, when it was, perhaps, too late to defeat Llanelly 612 638
vouslv London & North-Western
s 'Wounded. The National Guard did not act them ; or, finally, that, afterthe outbreak, he deemed London and Blackwall 5l 52 1,835 1,687
London & South-Western
on
this occasion, because the colonel, Count Fenn- it his duty to stand by his partisans through thick
Lond. Brighton, &S. Coast. 2414 2114 16,132 26,149
yOli, although he was aware of the danger, had un- and thin, strained a point to animate himself against London, Chatham, & Dover 724 564 3,832 1,239
accountably absented himself, and his subalterns his own good conscience for the purpose of bringing Lond., Tilbury, & Southend 45 45 1,414 1,745
51 ,Sheffield,&Lincolnsh 231 i 2311 13,371 14,409
refused to act ern
Uanch. S.Jun.& Altrincham 94
Ou t positive orders fro then
1t h requesteir c
commander.
mf theraa Prefect,nder. - them out harmless under the tegis of his great name,
and allowed his zeal for them to get the better even end7aPuir (t west 6244 6N4 37,r253 3P42
The bloodshed *A Brescia caused great ferment of his strict veracity. Midland a t.Westn. of stern) 1924 1924 4,728 4,375 '
Monkland 56 1,573 1,592 I
throughout Italy, and the
Alonmouthsh. Rail. & Canal 741 44 2,471 2,386 ,
popular displeasure was Garibaldi was not at the Chamber to-day at 12,
Newcastle and Carlisle 7B 78 3,081 3,787
increased by GaribaldhadeasaTatio .
n that his officers ,when the sitting opened, and was said to have left North British (incl. Selkirk 1
Nullo and his companions, had
and Galashiels) .•
2354 'll 21 6,442 6,181 (
. his acted with his full' ' early in the morning after his interview with San- North Devon knowledge and be consent, and that he took front. The Chamber was not in a sufficient number
upon himself all the responsibility of the Sarnico 1
in that same manifesto, I N-Eastern(Bedale&Leybrn) 81t5.1 7N 36, .rl9l 41,512 '
North London 9 9 2,801 2,536 c
North Staffordshire 246 246 7,491 7,129
to deliberate up to three o'clock p.m.
expedition. He indulged,
woeds of condemnation of the TUESDAY, AFTER 3 P.M. Oswestry and Newton 42 42 755 592
Atth.=s Canal & Railway 15C24 16924 2,046658 1,933591 !
in some ill-judged The battle has broken out. Crispi attacks the
conduct of the soldiers who had guarded the Scottish Central
public Ministry; Rattazzi is to be heard in reply; we
Stottish North-Eastern 1324 1324
4,835 4,917 '
gaol by force of arms, calling them cutthroats and shall soon have fire along the line.
Shrewsbury & Birmingham
--- - I
____ - Shrewsbury and Chester.,. 48 48 _
hangmen; rash expressions, which he afterwards,
FOREIGN MAIL PACKET LIST, Shrewsbury & Hereford ... 51 51, 1,802 2,159-- t
Shropshire Union 291
754 „291 1,080 1,060 .9.
with no very good grace, as many think, eneea_
-4 South Devon
'54 3,609 3,700 /
voured to retract, or at least to qualify. MAILS DUE. South-Eastern 306 306 20,258 20,909
Arms and papers a and Mauritius, via Southampton ..June 18. South Wales l7ll 1711 -
S. Yorkshire and River Dun 118 na - 1
94 9,730 7,982 t
- I
China, ne°,-,,e
were in the meanwhKedieit. szheiraP:naliand
....
covered at Genoa, Florence, and elsewhere, and via Marseilles
Cape ot G
r‘CaPe Verds, by British packet. ..June 12.
June 4. ,T,taoesteanleand Darlington .. 161 ll
51
04 4,888 4,731 - became evident that the Sarnico assemblage was no Hope, Ascension, and St. Helena.. July 2. Ulster
g, and Singapore, via Southampton. June 18. Ulverstone and Lancaster
t
10 165 148 ,
isolated m ovement,but that avast expedition byland
Falkland island s•• Marseilles ...June 12. Vale of Clwyd.
35 Gibraltar,• --' ..Vale of Neath
July 4. - 35 1,9 i 5 2,107 '
and sea was in contemplation, by
via
mouth ...........
lk 31 31
Vi, aterford and h! emiy... 7 330 306 C
also India (Calcutta), air7ton ....
Waterford and Limerick... 7 1,398 1,161 t
Austrian frontier of Tyrol was threatened, but
which not only the
-- ellen, via ..S.outhampton . June 10.274 274 745 852
the coasts of Dalmatia and the Danubian provinces, India -
... .
.......
(Bombay), via via Marseilles.....
June 12. W.Hartlepool Harbr.&Rail. 39 39 4,281 5,090 I'
Austrian and the Turkish side, so that - via Bararths:raptonJune 10. West Midland - - - e
both on the
Lisbon ..... .
..... braes:
June 5. W'haven,Cleator,&Eg,rmnt 1 7 511 506
simultaneously to be yen-
-12
Whitehaven Junction 635 648 1
an onset was, in Malta, Egypt, and Aden, ei ... i..
apipton
...... . .... June 11. 35
short,
the vulnerable points of the hia cies June
june
510..
June 10. Whitehaven & Furness Jun. 35 632 781 C
tuned upon on all
)
FOREIGN AND COLONIAL.:
Oporto and V.iso .:. ...... .... e
Austrian empire. To what extent this superb pro- Newfoundland .............
............. June 11. Antwerp and Rotterdam... 52 62 1,086 1,118 t
U. S. and British IN N. America, by 33,47.e-ftet.... „ June 11. Austrian B2B 673 38,258 37,,26 I
ject had any existence except on paper, or what
_ by u.s.'re'clet• •• . Juno 11. Belgian Eastern Junction 264 264 270 322
reliance was put on the co-operation of the Hunga-
- by Canadian et.,-.• • Buffalo and Lake Huronl6l4 1,625 1,421
W.C. of Africa,
_Madeira, and Teneriffe. Paeeeteene ___ Detroit and Milwaukie lB5 185 2,867 2,713 c
*„
rians and other Austrian subjects on the disaffected
Bahamas, via New York .................... July 3 Dutch Rhenish lOB4 1084 3,982 4,962
and mutinous spirit of some of tho Austrian regi
of French, Ger- Mexico.
..June• • East Indian
Luxembourg l3l
1032 1032 63,205 55,732
28. Grand Trunk ot Canada 109970 19701. 14,165 12,751 1‘
113ents, and no less on the sympathy
a a it All parts of West Indies, including Chili, Peru, i 13,194 10,c23 8
al", and European democracy (save the mare. .s California, and British C01umbia........,.,, Great Indisn, Peninsula 4371 3504 6,576 4,241 ~
would not now-it will perhaps never-be easy to elmoln•••••••••••••••.
-- - - 131 128
jiine
13,
EGGrareesaTjWestern of Canada 345 345 4,920 3,302 1
8,572 7,469 1
The report of the Bank of British North America, , 114:1°47,1a %tort?
teaonnsesavada&a
iLrworthe run France 7Ol 623
142
159151 15,562,3 t
decide. That Mazzini had a finger in the pie is
Alloca.n.t 31904211 281
matter of certainty ; and every one knows to what to be presented on the 10th inst., states the profit for the I`,l,9rthelaS3,
94 1,977 1762 I
extent, since 1849, and, indeed, since his first dela- year 1861 to have been ..t61,212, out of which a half-yeatiy
en,
~eVaTrunk 44 -
dividend at the rate of 6 per cent, per annum will be pale 0
Sions of 1831, ho is wedded'to the notion that bothpZ.ra anYdalla, & Mediterrn 879 870 94,658 90,127
the sth of July, leaving £1,212 to be added to the rest• T.
f * . erna
rnboOrleans
550 64-6 f
he and ilia party are victim's of a vast conspiracy f en Ofwhich is thus raised to £126,978. The realization Of the toyeiDaneiesii .... ...
64-94 558 -
0
all States against all people., 543 590
securities held against the doubtful debts of 1857 and 18'58 SsolinttreAeulisttua. e. - 69.
68 68 1,402 1,634
and that the triumph
secu
of his cause will be the result' of a geeat, irresistible has n
proceeded less favourably than had been expected, and southern of prail: ....
..
movement of all nations
West Fla' • 'cie•i:,; ' ....... • .... :: 775 773 28,40 23g. h
These ideas, which take hold of vote but very weak
against. all Governments, a considerable sum of the year's profits has been applied to
75 7,•••2 901 a
meet the deficiency. It is also stated that the civil war in W. and N.W. ot . ii4.141;e .ee 75
•
and silly young brains in T 1
-t4:31., have, however-it America has affected the business of the bank, and ;led to 750 750 37,932 41,657
hold upon ---------------e------____
a large accumulation of its funds in London, where they
is painful to hale?: V) avow :i.t,_,orn6
Tha
.Beenee Contemporaine
are employed at low rates of interest, The transactions of
, Ga ri bal di, whose Ilea is,
..
d borne peop., it ,
. e •. • was by no heirs b ' een small, but an by M. Troytong, announces an article of
ate branch in-Vancouver's Island calculated to attract attention. I • i' b
means as strong as his heart. is tearless, confiding,
ion. tis 0 0 A
g) improvement is looked for from the recent character of the entitled " the Causes which gavo
drank in such notions from Diaz -'improvement
to Rome the Sovereignty W
Awl generous; who
e e gold discoveries in British Columbia, of Italy."

The Revue Con
by M. Tropiong, calculated to attract aannotuactieesn.anlt
titled " The Causes which gave to Rome the Sovereignty
on
of Italy." ai
sr ti eo

ThE SUN, LONDON, SATURDAY E N7'NlllO4, JUNE 7, 1862.

LATV INTELLIGENCE.—June 6.

JUDICIAL COMMITTEE OF PRIVY
COUNCIL,

year, and is in the gift of the masters and fellows
of Trinity College, Cambridge.

THE BISHOP OF WINCHESTER AND THE REV. DUN •
BAR HEATEI.-JUDGMENT.

In this case, as it originally stood in the Court of
Arches, to which it was taken by letters of request
from the Consistory Court of Winchester, the office
of the judge was promoted by Mr. John Burder, of
Parliament-street, the secretary to the Bishop of
Winchester, against the Rev. Dunbar Isidore Heath,
M.A., Vicar of Brading in the Isle of Wight, who
published a volume of 19 sermons "on important
subjects," containing doctrines, as was alleged, con-
trary to the articles and creeds contained in the
Book of Common Prayer. The case was heard at
great length by Dr. Lushington, the Dean of the
Court of Arches, who eventually found that the
charges against him were true, and sentenced him
to deprivation from his benefice:
From that sentence Mr. Heath:appealed to the
Judicial Committee of Privy Council. Having
helrd the case sew ral weeks since, their lordships
assembled at four o'clock this afternoon to deliver
judgment.

COURT OF PROBATE AND DIVORCE.
(Before Sir C. Cresswell.)
GRIFFITHS V. GRUFITHS,
This was a suit instituted by the wife for a dis-
solution of marriage on the ground of cruelty and
adultery, to which there was no appearance on the
part of the respondent.
Mr. Day and Mr. Serle were counsel for the peti-
tioner,

There were present—The Archbishop of York,
the Bishop of London, Lord Justice Knight Bruce,
Lord Justice Turner, and Lord Cranworth.
Lord Cranworth delivered judgment. He said
their lordships had been called upon to ascertain
whether certain opinions held and published by Mr.
Heath, the appellant, were or were not contrary and
repugnant to the articles of religion and the
creed of the Church of England. The charges
against Mr. Heath, although of an ecclesi-
astical character, were offences under the
statute. Their lordships must look to the
statute entirely, for they must not enter into
the inquiry whether or not the articles were
conformable to the Scriptures. All they had to do
was-Ist. To ascertain on the ordinary principles
of cones,...setae, n last ma. the true meaning of any
article alleged to be infringed. 2d. What was the
true interpretation of the language of Mr. Heath.
3d. Whether by such language he had contradicted
the language of the articles and creeds. Dr. Lush-
ington, after hearing the case, came to a conclusion
adverse to Mr. Heath, believing that the volume of
sermons complained of contained doctrines irrecon-
cilable with the articles and creeds, and sentenced
him to deprivation unless Mr. Heath would consent
to revoke his errors. Against that decision Mr.
Heath appealed, and the case was argued before
their lordships last March. Their lordships had
given every attention to the case, and were now
prepared to state the advice which they would give
to her Majesty on the subject. The specific charge
was that Mr. Heath had published nineteen ser-
mons eontradictory of the articles settled by Con-
vocation in 1562. It had been doubted, during the
hearing of the appeal, whether the sermons had
ever been preached or not, but that had really no-
thing to do with the case, for Mr. Heath was
charged with the publication of the sermons, and
no particular mode of publication had beenindi-
cated. It had also been argued that whatever
might be technically the merits of the volume in
question, Mr. Heath did not advisedly maintain
doctrine inconsistent with the articles, and it was
said that those only were affected by the statute who
avowedly declared that the articles were unsound.
Dr. Lushington refused to hear any argument of that
sort, and their lordships thought he was right. They
came now, therefore, to the substantial point in dis-
pute, whether or not Mr. Heath opposed the articles
of 1562. If the statements made by Mr. Heath
could be reconciled with those articles Mr. Heath
would be absolved, but if his language was in-
consistent with and subversive of them, then the
decision of the Court of. Arches must he affirmed.
The first charge against Mr. Heath had reference to
the 11th Article, that on justification by faith. The
learned judge below considered that Mr. Heath had
stated that which was inconsistent with the article,
and with that opinion their lord hips agreed. They
did not believe, as had been urged by Mr. Heath's
counsel, that his phrases were irrational in the sense
of being incapable of having a meaning affixed to
them. (Lord Cranworth quoted largely fiom Mr.
Heath's sermons in support of this view, particularly
from the 14th and 19th.) Their lordships had been
most anxious to find something in these sermons
which would be eonsistent with the articles, but they
had been unable to find anything, for Mr. Heath had
given an entirely new version of justification by
faith, which was not contemplated by the article.
He held the doctrine not of justification by faith in
Christ, but justification by the faith of Christ him
self. Their lordships understood him to deny alto-
gether the doctrine of justification by faith in Christ
es insisted upon in the article. The first charge
against Mr. Heath then appeared to their lordships
to be made out, and they found nothing in any other
part of the volume to induce them to alter that
opinion, although in the fourth sermon he made
some remarks on justification which appeared to
come more closely within the meaning of the article.
The next charge which the appellant was called upon
to answer was, that by sermons 8,9, 15, 18, and 19,
he had affirmed doctrines contrary to the 2d and 31st
Articles, which referred to the sacrifice of Christ,
and the oblation he made upon the cross; and
which stated that he was dead and buried, and made
a full perfect propitiation and sacrifice for the sins
of the whole world. Now, proceeding, as they
were bound to do, to put a construction upon these
articles, their lordships had no doubt that they
clearly laid down the doctrine that Christ died to
reconcile us to God, and that his redemption
was complete. Mr. Heath's views were diametri-
cally opposed to such views (Lord Cranworth quoted
passages in which Mr. Heath denied the sacrifice
altogether, and characterised such a doctrine as
"detestable.") It was not for their lordships to in-
quire whether Mr. Heath himself had clear views
upon those points, all they had to consider was
whether he negatived and denied the articles. They
were of opin ion that he did so; and they must, there-
fore, hold the second charge against him proved.
The third charge was founded on several passages
in the 16th sermon, which were alleged to contra-
vene the Bth Article, affirming the Apostles' Creed
on the forgiveness of sins, the Nicene Creed on
baptism, and !..s also being repugnant to the 16th
and 27th Articles.
.The articles in question said
that men had fallen into sin, that by baptism we
were cleansed, and that by the blood of Christ men
might be redeemed. But the whole scope of Mr.
Christian Heath's
sermonNTa,that there could not be in the
dispensation anything like forgiveness of
sins, although there might be remission of sin, which
he considered a totally different thing. He con-
tended that forgiveness of sins had nothing to do
with the Gospel—that God's scheme was remission,
and that no scheme at all would be necessary for
forgiveness. It was impossible, with every inclina-
tion to put a favourable construction on its lan-
guage, not to come to the conclusion that Mr. Heath
rejected altogether the doctrine of forgiveness,
whereas it was in that sense we were taught in the
Creed to say—" I believe in the forgiveness of sins."
It was hue that the word in the Nicene Creed was
remission, but it was used in the sense of forgive-
ness. On these grounds their lordships concurred
with the Court below, that the third charge, like
the other two, had been proved. The remaining
charge was of a somewhat different character, and
was framed on the language at the commencement
of the 12th sermon. He said that old philosophic
terms, not warranted by Scripture, had been im-
ported into the articles, and that these terms dark-
ened and confused the otherwise comforting state-
ments of Holy Scripture. He cited, amongst other
phrases, " guilt of sin," " satisfaction," " necessary
to salvation." The d,snial of these phrases, their lord-
ships held, contravened the articles to which they
related. He also objected to the phrases " immor-
tality of the soul," " going to Heaven," " going to
hell," but it did not appear to their lordships that
he meant to deny the doctrine of everlasting life or
everlasting rewards and punishments. Reviewing
the whole case, their lordships had come to the con-
clusion that Me. Heath had published doctrines
contrary and repugnant to the Articles of 1562
that he had denied that Christ's blood was shed as
a propitiation and satisfaction for sin ; and had
affirmed that these phrases, " guilt of sin," " satis-
faction," &c., had been forced into the articles with-
out any sanction from Scripture. Their lordships
wished to state that their attention had been drawn
to a letter which Mr. Heath had addressed to the
Bishop of Winchester, stating that he had not ad-
visedly or knowingly taught or published anything
contrary to the articles, and that if it could be shown
where he had done so he would retract the expres-
sions. Their lordships had now to ask whether
Mr. heath
wasprepared unreservedly to revoke the
passages which had been quoted, and which their
lordships held to be contrary to the articles, before
they proceeded to discharge the only remaining
part of their ditty. Otherwise their lordships
feel bound to ad'ise her Majesty that the sentence
of the Court of Arches must be affirmed. Under
any circumetaaces Mr. Heath must ray the costs of
of this appeal,
would
Dr. Phillimore, on the part of his client, said that
Mr. Heath hartbeen present and had heard their
lordships' judgment. He might perhaps like to
answer for hinself.
Mr. Heath rose and so id--I have nothing to re-
yoke, y lore's.
Her Majes:y will therefore confirm the sentence
of eteprivaties from his living which the Court of
Arches prononneed, and the vicarage of Brading
ra
will be declaied vacant.
The benefice is worth between £6OO and £7OO a

The parties were married in October, 1854, the
petitioner at the time being living with her mother,
who was a person of some means, and the respon-
dent being employed as barman to his father, who
was a publican. After the marriage they lived in
the Edgware-road, and the alleged cruelty com-
menced from a very early period, and consisted
of threatening to strike the petitioner with an
iron bar a month before her confinement, and
other acts of violence, in consequence of which
the petitioner was delivered of a still-born child.
The respondent then went to America, but in
June last was seen by the brother of the peti-
tioner in a cab with a female, and he was traced
to a house in Gloucester-street, Theobald's-road,
where he was living with a woman under the
name of Jackson. He admitted to the petitioner's
brother his having formed this adulterous connexion.
Decree nisi with costs.
GLOVER V. GLOVER AND BLACK.
This was a suit instituted by the husband for
a divorce on the ground of his wife's adultery with
the co-respondent, and there was no defence.
Mr. Huddlestone, Q.C., and Mr. Mereweather
-appeared for the petitioner.
The evidence was to the effect that the parties
were married at the parish church of Stepney some
years back, and after cohabiting for some time they
removed to Holloway. They were separated twice
in consequence of differences between them, the last
time in January last, when the respondent went to
reside at St. John's-wood. The enmespondent was
in the habit of visiting her every evening, and ulti-
mately the respondent went to Notting-hill to live,
and there she gave birth to a child, which she stated
to one of the witnesses was Mr. Black's.
Decree nisi with costs.
AVILA V. AVILA.
This was a petition by the wife praying for a
judicial separation on the ground of her husband's
adultery, and the respondent pleaded denial.
Dr. Spinks and Mr. Serle were counsel for the
petitioner, and Mr. Inderwick represented the
respondent.
It appeared from the evidence for the petitioner
that the parties were married in 1859, and had lived
happily together for two years. In 1861 they were
residing at Mile-end, where the respondent was
employed as an assistant at a pawnbroker's, and in
the course of that year a Mrs. Travers came to the
house with a child, which she stated was Mr. Avila's,
and the result of an improper intimacy between him
and her daughter. The petitioner left the house
after this occurrence, and had not since resumed
cohabitation with the respondent.
The witnesses were cross-examined at some
length, but no evidence was called for the defence.
The Court reserved judgment.
GREENWOOD V. GREENWOOD.
In this case the wife originally petitioned the
Court for a dissolution of marriage on the ground
of cruelty and adultery, to which the respondent
appeared, and denied the allegations. The charge
of cruelty was abandoned, and the petition was con-
sequently limited to a prayer for judicial separation.
Mr. O'Malley, Q.C., and Dr. Wambey, were
counsel for the petitioner; and Dr. Spinks attended
for the respondent.
It appeared that the parties were married in June,
1859, and lived happily for some time, but the wife,
suspecting her husband, who represents himself to
be a commercial traveller, had him watched. She
then discovered that he was in the habit of visiting
a female named Ann Webb, at a place called Rose-
village, at Uxbridge, and subsequently it was ascer-
tained that he had frequently committed adultery
with this person.
The ease was fully proved and the Court pro-
nounced a decree of judicial separation.
TRUWHITT T. TRUWHITT AND FISH.
This was a suit instituted by Mr. Chas. Truwhitt,
a solicitor, for a dissolution of marriage, on the
ground of adultery; and there was no appearance
on the part of the corespondent. The respondent
appeared, and pleaded denial of the adultery ; that
the petitioner treated her with violence, and deserted
her; that he conduced by his misconduct to the
adultery alleged; and that he was in collusion with
the co-respondent.
Dr. Spinks and Mr. Hance were counsel for the
petitioner • and Mr. Garth, Q.C., and Mr. Serle for
the respondent.
Dr. Spinks said that the parties were married at
St. Luke's, Chelsea, in December, 1850, and resided
at Chelsea, Gravesend, and elsewhere, until 1853.
The husband was in very good practice, but unfor-
tunately the wife contracted habits of intemper•
ante, and she frequently came to his office in a
state of intoxication, which had the effect of destroy-
ing his business. The respondent's conduct became
so violent that the petitioner determined to leave
the country, and went to Australia. Prior to his
departure he made provision for his wife, by placing
1:52 in the hands of Mr. Odey, a solicitor, to be paid
to her at £1 a-week, and he remitted her money
from Australia, which was regularly paid, until Mr.
Odey discovered that she had been leading a profli-
gate life, when it was discontinued. The husband
had treated the wife with the greatest kindness,
and there was no ground for pleas which she had
pleaded on the record.
Some evidence was adduced in support of the
petitioner's case, and the Court then adjourned.

POLICE INTELLIGENCE.--June 5.

BOW STREET.—COMING HOME FROM THE
DERBY.—Charles Probert and Wm. Forrest, two
well-dressed young men, were brought before Mr.
Hall, the former charged with creating a disturb-
ance in the Strand, in front of Exeter Hall, and the
latter with assaulting the police-constable.
Policeman Castel], F 129, deposed—l was on duty
at about 11 o'clock last night outside Exeter Hall,
when the company was leaving after Madame
Goldschmidt-Lind's concert. I saw the prisoner
Probert and two others standing across the middle
of the footway, passing remarks on the people and
creating a great obstruction. They had little
dolls stuck round their hats. A number of dis-
orderly persons were assembled round them, and
gentlemen and ladies coming out of the hail
could not get by. I spoke to Probert, and asked
him to go away, but he refused. I then said if he
did not go I would take him into custody. He re•
plied, " Two policemen could not take me." I then
took him into custody. He resisted, and we had a
severe struggle, but another constable came to my
assistance, and we removed him to the station-
house. As we passed Russell-street on the way to
the station the prisoner Forrest came beside me and
struck me a severe blow in the face. Both prison-
ers were sober.

The prisoner Probert being informed that he was
at liberty to cross-examine the witness,entered into
a long rambling and not very intelligible statement
in defence, alleging that he was a gentleman, and
had behaved throughout in the most gentlemanly
way, and entreating the magistrate to remember
that he lived in a Christian country, and that cer-
tain witnesses whom he was about to call had only
come forward "in consequence of the milk of
human kindness."

Forrest asked the officer—" Will you swear you
did not kick me twice lb"
Witness—Certainly, I did not kick you at all.
Inspector M'Kenzie stated that several gentlemen
having complained to him of the conduct of the pri-
soner Probert and his friends, he desired Castell to
remove them unless they could be induced to go
away quietly. Mr. Probert was sober.
Marsh, 163 F, corroborated Castell's statement.
When first spoken to Probert went away, but in a
few minutes returned, and recommenced the dis-
turbance.

Probert denied that he was giving any annoyance
or causing any obstruction when the officer arrested
him, and told him' to go away in a peremptory and
dictatorial manner. He (Probert) replied, You
are exceeding your duty in interfering with a gen-
tleman who is going along peaceably and giving no
offence." The officer then seized him in a violent
manner, and he said, " You need not use force. I will
go with you quietly. If I meant to resist two of you
could not take me." He was well connected, and had
been brought up like a gentleman, and he considered
he had behaved as a gentleman, It was true
that he had put some dolls in his hat, but even
noblemen did that when returning from the Derby,
Forrest said it appeared to him that Probert was
unnecessarily interfered with by the police, and also
that they were using undue violence. He remons-
trated with them on finding that they persisted in
their rough treatment of Probert. He said he
would go to the station-house to see that Probert
had fair play. Castell then kicked him. He took
no notice of this outrage, intending to make a com-
plaint at the station-house, but as they crossed
Great Russell-street into Bow-street Castell kicked
him again, upon which he admitted that he struck
the policeman. He had no previous acquaintance
.with Probert.
Mr. Hall asked if ho had been at the races:
Forrest-No; I had been to the concert with my
sister.
The prisoner called several witnesses. Three
gentlemen who had been at the concert conclurred
in tho opinion that Probert's demeanour was in-_
offensive. They admitted that he endeavoured to
get away when taken iu custody, but said that this