The Sun.
London, England, 1862-09-03 00:00:00

LA

'AY.

Share
100

ClOSing
Price.

POLICE-THIS DAY.

Railways

Pald.

1 Business done

ktiantie & St Lawrence
stir. f Bom.,Baroda&Cent Ind
i Gu. 5 per cent
20 Do. New
.
2oh Buffalo and Laxe Huron
10 Do. Preference ......
100 c Builalo,Brant,tGodricl,
6 p. et. bds. Aug. 1, 1872'i
100 Do. do. July 1, 1873'
100 Do. do. June 1, 1874
st i Cicutta.& S. Er.stn. (Lll, ,'st Cape Town ,t.: Dock Scrip
17i 'Demerara
stock Eastn. Bengal gu. 5 p. ci
stock 'East Indian, gu. 5 p. c.
20 Do. do. G Ext
20 I Do. do. II do.
stock Grand Trunk of Canada
100 Do. 6 per cent. Pref
100 Do. 2d Pref. 6 per ct
100 Do. 6 per ct. Debentr
100 Do. 7 per cent. 1862
100 Do. do. 1867..
100 , Do. do. 1872
stock 'Gt.lndiaPenin.gua.sp.c
20 Do. New gua. 5 p. c...
20 Do. January, 1862 ..
stock Gt. South.of India (Lim

SHERIFF'S COURT.
(Before Mr. Gibbons.)
A ROW AMONGST THE PHOTOGRAPHERS.--ROSE V. ORSITT.
This was an action to recover wages in lieu of notice,
plaintiff being a photographic " operator," and defendant
an artist.
The plaintiff said he had been in the service of the de-
fendant for one month upon an understanding that he was
to have a fortnight's notice. Without assigning any rea-
son defendant summarily discharged plaintiff.
Defendant said that the plaintiff was quite incompetent,
and indeed was not a photographic operator at all. Ho was
by profession a public singer.
To prove that he was competent plaintiff produced a por-
trait he had actually taken of defendant himself.
Defendant (producing a bundle)—" Here look at these,
sir."

MARLBOROUGH-STREET.

His Honour, looking at defendant's portrait, would not
say plaintiff was incompetent, and therefore plaintiff would
have a verdict.
ATTORNEYS IN BANKRUPTOY-CHORLEY V. REH.
This was an action to recover £l4 upon a bill of exchange.
Mr. Buchsnau, for defendant, would admit the signature,
but contended that there was privity between plaintiff and
defendant. Plaintiff was an attorney, and defendant had
been bankrupt. The defendant complained, first, that the
bill was given for certain work to be done, which had not
been done; and, secondly, that through plaintiff's neglect
defendant had to employ and pay other parties.
Plaintiff's clerk said that any delay which occurred was
through defendant's own neglect.
Mr. Buchanan said that the amount charged by plaintiff
would not be supported if the bill of costs were taxed, and
ultimately the case was adjourned for evidence.
MARKETS---THIS DAY.

guaranteed 5 perscent.
Gt. W. of Canada Shares
Do. New .......
Do. 6 p.c. '73 wlth't opt.
Do. 5i p. c. do. '77 do
Do. 1878..

Indian Branch Limited
Madras guar., 5 p. c.
Do. 4,1 p. c. Extension
Dc. 4i d 0...
Iffelb.Corp. 6 p. o. Bnds.
Newßrunswick t Candtii
Ry.di.Land(Lim.)q.6pc
Class A Capital Share
Do. do. Land d 0........

Do. do. B Capital d 0...
Do. do. Land do.
N. Rl.C'da6 pc Ist pf Ms
Scinde
Do. Punjaub
,Do. Do.
Do. Indus:St. Flo.

WESTMINSTER.

THE SUN, LONDON, WEDNESDAY EVEI.IsIG, SEPTENIBER 3, 1862.

CHARGE OF DEFRAUDING A COACHBUIIDER OF A.
WAGONETTE,—George Blore, described as a commission
agent, of 2, Crescent-place, Brompton, was charged before
Mr. Tyrwhitt with being concerned with another not in
custody, in obtaining a wagonette of the value of £5O
from Mrs. Sophia Peake, widows coachbuilder, of 6, Lisle-
street, Leicester-square.

Mrs. Sophia Peake said that on the last day of February
a man named Sale, then coachman to Lord Garvagh, who
was a customer, called upon her with the accused, and said
he wanted a wagonette to job for a friend of Lord Gar-
vagh's. The accused (Blore) then said " Yes, Sale has
two horses of his own," evidently meaning her to under-
stand that Sale was a man of means, and also, that his
lordship owed Sale money, but that he would not be paid
till after the 14th of March, that being his lordship's pay-
day. The wagonette was of the value of £5O, and was
delivered by a man in her employ.
Mr. Tyrwhitt—Have you seen Sale since ?
Mrs. Peake—No. The wagonette was sold a few days
after it was delivered.
Henry Dunkley, living in a mews near Belgrave-square,
and who said he was a coachmonger, said he had been out
with a carriage, and on coming back he met the accused
and Sale with a wagonette, and they asked him to purchase
it. He believed it was Blore who asked him to buy it. They
followed him (witness) home, and he told them that he
would take it to a Mr. Hatton, of Margaret-street, and
show it to him. They asked either £35 or £4O for it, and
on his offering £3O for it they consented to take it. Sale
said it was Lord Garvagh's carriage, and that he was told
to sell it, the accused being with him at the time. Mr.
Hatton gave him (witness) a cheque, and he paid Sale
for it.

Mr. Ty-rwhitt said it seemed to him that nothing was
proved against the prisoner. The prisoner must be dis-
charged.

SERIOUS CHARGE AGAINST A Bot.--John Fallon, a
little fellow only 10 years of age, was charged with cutting
and wounding Thomas Hennessey, with intent to do him
grievous bodily harm.

Thomas Hennessey, a labourer, 13, Bolton's-gardens,
Chelsea, mid that he lived in the same house as the pri-
soner, and the latter's father was a crossing-sweeper, and
was in the habit of coming home very late at night drunk
and disturbing prosecutor, who had to get up early in the
morning. In consequence of this he was speaking to the
boy's father last night when the defendant suddenly struck
him on the arm violently. He pursued him, and when ho
got to the Royal Hospital Hotel was told he was bleeding,
and then found that he had been stabbed through his
smock-frock. He afterwards went to the hospital, where
the wound was dressed. Was certain no one struck him
but the boy, and he ran away directly.
Police-constable Mackenzie, 66 B, proved apprehending
the boy, on whose shirt he found some blood. He denied
the charge, and no knife or sharp instrument had been
found.