The Sun.
London, England, 1862-09-11 00:00:00

L::TIIE .SUN,
~.tj.4AONDON, .' Tritnts DAY
..Er,E.NIN4, §E,PTEIVOER, 1.1,..
_1.862.

person so -removing, driving, or conducting
such sheep or lambs shall first have obtained
a certificate, in writing,-signed by some person who
may have been authorised by two or more justices
of the said county of Wilts, to seize sheep or lambs
infected with or labouring under the said disorders,
under the Ist section of the said act, that such re-
moval, driving, or conducting may take place with-
out danger of spreading the said disease.

All sheep and lambs dying in any of the stages
of the said disease, wheresoever such death or deaths
shall or may occur, shall forthwith be buried by
the person or persons in whose possession such
sheep or lambs may be at the time of death, with
their skins on, in pits of not less than five feet in
depth, and the carcases so buried shall be covered
with quicklime.

All sheds and places whatsoever, and allrrailway
trucks and other vehicles which may or shall have
been used or occupied by sheep or iambs affected
by the said disease, shall forthwith, after having
been so used, be thoroughly cleansed with water,
and immediately afterwards purified with chloride
of lime by the person or persons in possession of
such sheds, places, trucks, and vehiclesrespectively.
Every person in posse:3sion of any sheep or lambs
in or amongst which the said disease shall manifest
itself, shall forthwith give notice in writing of the
fact to the chief constable or superintendent of
pOlice of the county or borcugh in which such
sheep or lambs may be.
And it is further ordered that this, order shall
continue in force for three calendar months from
and after the date hereof.

ARTHUR, HELPS.

HORRIBLE FRATRICIDE IN C.A.RIIIA.R.

2HENSHIRE.

LLANELLY, TUESDAY.
On Sunday afternoon the village of Llanon was
thrown into a state of considerable excitement,
caused by the announcement that a young man
named Llewellan Edwards; son of a respectable
farmer at Dwrclawdd-fach, had shot his brother,
Sommersley Edwards. The police immediately
went in search, and succeeded the same afternoon in
apprehending the alleged murderer at a place called
Pontardulais ; and, having conveyed him to the
lock-up of this town, he was brought up yesterday
and examined before Mr. G. H. Rees and Mr. R. G.
Thomas, jun., two of the magistrates for Carmar-
thenshire.

The Town-hall was densely crowded when the
prisoner, a gentlemanly-looking young man, dressed
in naval uniform, was charged with the crime of
wilful murder. His age was stated to be 21. The
magistrates having first considered it expedient to
retire into a private room, they proceeded to ex-
amine the witnesses in the prisoner's presence.
Police-constable James John deposed that he had
apprehended the prisoner. On informing him that
he was charged with having shot his brother, he
replied, "It is true. I have shot my brother." On
the way to Llanelly he said he had been commanded
to do it by the Lord. On searching him nothing
was found except a pocket-handkerchief and a
tobacco pouch.
David Price, another police-constable, also sta-
tioned at Pontardulais, stated that on going to the
farmhouse, where the murder had been committed,
on Sunday evening, he found the door locked, and
that until he mentioned who he was he was unable
to obtain admittance. When he went in he asked
to see the deceased, and the body was shown to him.
It was in the front room, lying on a board. The de-
ceased had been shot in the head. There were cuts on
the upper part of the forehead. The whole of the
brains were gone, and the scalp had been cut off.
He inquired how the murder had been.committed,
when a hook was brought by some person in the house,
and on it was part of the brains. It was a farmer of
the name of Michael who brought him the hook, an ,
who told him at the same time that he had found it in
the deceased's hand. Witness was of opinion that
the wounds upon the deceased could not have been
self-inflicted, and that they could not have been
produced by falling upon any sharp substance. On
examining the yard he found a good deal of blood
and brains, and also a part of the scalp. More of
the brains were scattered about the walk. Witness
made inquiry as to whether any gun had been dis-
covered, but was unable to obtain any intelligence
on that subject. He had heard, however, that the
prisoner was seen with a gun in his possession
about a quarter of a mile from the farmhouse. The
murder was committed about three o'clock in the
afternoon, and witness had not yet ascertained
whether anyone had witnessed the deed.
The prisoner, having been duly cautioned, made
the- following statement :—My father is a solicitor
at Daventry, in Northamptonshire, and is now
living there. He took a farm in Llanon, called
Dwrclawdd-fach, in November last, where my
mother and brother resided. My sister is married
to a clergyman, named Edward Montford, of Fore-
mark-hall, near Derby. .My father is now at
Daventry. On the 27th of July last I was getting
up at seven in the morning, to join some young
men, when two angels appeared to me, and asked
me if I knew what day of the week it was? It
was Sunday. I then remained in my bed chamber
fqr six weeks. Yesterday I received a communi-
cation from the Lord to shoot my brother, who had
broken every commandment. I found the gun
loaded in the kitchen, prepared for me, It was a
double-barrelled gun. I found my brother in the
yard with a sickle in his hand. I raised the gun.
He said he was my only brother. • I obeyed the
Lord's command. I did not tell him that I was
going to shoot him. I was about six feet from him.
He put his hand to his head. I fired, and he fell
dead. I did not touch him with the sickle. Nobody
but the Lord was present when I shot him. I have
been a master's assistant in the navy. I am twenty-
one years of age, and retired from the navy about
three years ago. I had been wounded in 1859 by
the son of a clergyman, named Nicholas Dewys, in
South America. I was on board the ship Wasp,
sloop-of-war. He (Dewys) fired a revolver pistol
at me, thinking it was not loaded. The ball entered
my right groin. I had am attack of epilepsy from
the effects of the wound, and was invalided in con-
sequence, and left the nays-.

'Phis statement the, prisoner signed with a firm
hand. He afterwards wrote a letter to his mother
to lend him some clothing ; and he expressed a wish
to be released from custody.
The examination was adjourned until a future
day, when Dr. Thomas, of Ltanelly, and other medi-
cal gentlemen, will give evidence as to the prisoners'
state of mind. Meanwhile, he has been committed
to Carmarthen gaol, on his own confession, on the
charge of murder.

HORRID MUI?D A 7 THE' PORTLAND
CONVICT ESTABLISHMENT.

An inquest was, on Tuesday, held at the Portland
tchonevbicotdeystoafblicshhmarelenst,
Evans,before Mr, F. 0. Steggall, on
aged 39, the master
s h o et rma
mpa pke
aaee
rlares
r,
segaedinpvdtae
that
tttwehi aetyrnii
sdi
neui rns t
usual
banae
lei theraf onsr, e pla thereni
rds
aol
an cells.
I
they
yo
Theiraera are
te convictsol lr s
h
dinnersthe
locked, a knife, for the purpose of enabling them to
cut their meat, is placed under each of their doors.
After they have been locked up an hour their cans
and knives are collected. On Monday the one o'clock
bell was rung as usual, when Warder Evans, the
deceased, took three of the convicts to' collect the
cans and knives in No. 1 Ward, E Hall. They
had collected from four or five wards when they
came to that where a convict of the name of Alfred
Preedy was confined. The warder unlocked the
door, and Preedy presented himself with his
can and knife, but instead of placing
his can in the tray which two of the convicts were
taking round to receive it, he drooped it on the floor.
The third convict who was with the warder then
held-out his hand for the knife, when Preedy pushed
him on one side, seized the warder by the neck with
his left arm, and with the knife in his right hand '
cut a deep gash under the warder's right ear, sever-
ing the jugular vein, the carotid artery, and the
great nerve of the neck. The two convicts carrying
the tray immediately Seized him, and compelled him
to let go his hold of Evans and to drop the knife.
They both said that when the knife was in Evans's
neck, Preedy moved his hand as if he was twisting
the knife round. Evans, when released, ran forward
several paces, and was led down to a room in the
infirmary, where he immediately expired. No rea-
son can be assigned why the act was committed.
None of the witnesses examined had ever heard that
any dispute or altercation had taken place between
the deceased and his murderer. Preedy, who is 21
years of age, was, we understand, formerly a drum-
mer in the 84th Regiment, but at Christmas, 1859,
was sentenced to 3 years' penal servitude for lar-
ceny, and had consequently
only between 3 and 4
months longer to serve.
Evans, the deceased, had
been a warder at Portland 8 ye;,rs, and was greatly
respected, not only by the officers of the prison, but
also by the well -conducted convicts. He has left a
widow and three children.

The jury, having heard the evidence, returned r.
verdict of wilful murder against Preedy, and the
coroner issued his warrant for his committal to Dor-
Chester for trial.

THE LATE DUKE GP SIITHERLAND.—The Me-
121Dijai church to the late Duke of Sutherland, at St. George,
Shropshire, will be consecrated by the Bishop of Lichfield
on Friday, the 10th of betober. The church, which is
situate on a bill, can bo seen for many miles in every di-
rect:on,

POLICE INTELLIGENCE, Sept. 10.

CLERKENWELL.—DISGRACEFUL AND CRIMI-
NAL ASSAULT BY AN OLD MAN.—John Buckley, a
dirty-looking old man, who described himself as a
labourer, residing at Portpool-lane, St. Andrew's,
was charged with violently assaulting Elizabeth
Burke under the, following circumstances :
Mr. T. Wakeling. solicitor, appeared for the pri-
soner; and Mr.' H. Allen, prosecuting officer of
the Associate Institute for the Protection of
Women, prosecuted.
Elizabeth Burke said—l live at No. 5, Portpool-
lane, Holborn. lam fifteen years of age. I have
been at place, at 2, Half Moon-court, where the
prisoner lodges, and I know him. On the 22d ult.,
between ten and eleven in the morning, I was in
the parlour sitting on a chair ; he, too, was in the
room. He came behind me, took hold of me, and
threw me on the floor. The witness then proceeded
to detail the facts of the assault, which left no
doubt but that the offence was committed.
In cross-examination the witness stated that she
screamed, but no one came to her assistance. She
fetched an errand for the prisoner, and then went
home and told her mother.

Mr. Taylor, surgeon, of 59, St. John-street-road,
having proved that he examined the girl,
Police-constable William Stockwell, 110 G, said
that he took the prisoner into custody. When ho
told him the charge he said, "So help me God, I
never did it."

Mr. Wakeling contended that the case was not
made out, but said, as the magistrate had expressed
his determination to send the case for trial, his client
would reserve his defence.

Mr. Barker fully committed the prisoner to New-
gate for trial, and refused bail.
ATTEMPTED SUICIDE THROUGH DISTRESS.—
Charlotte Randall, a woman who has been at work
in a dust-yard, was charged with attempting to
eommitTsuicide in the Regent's Canal.
From the evidence of one of the witnesses, of the
name of Shepherd, it appeared that yesterday the
defendant came to the dust-yard and complained of
the harsh manner in which she had been treated at
the workhouse, she at the same time stating that
she had been kept lying on the pavement. She had
a fit come on her, and she went and threw herself
into the canal. She was got out, and she then filled
her apron with iron, and said she was so tired of her
life in consequence of the harsh conduct of the work-
house officials, that she determined to kill herself.
The defendant was not fit to be out in the streets at
large, as she was subject to fits. She ought to be in
the workhouse, but they would not keep her there.
Mr. Barker inquired if the defendant had been
to the workhouse. _

The defendant said that she had, but they would
not adroit her. They said that she was an impos-
tor, and was not subject to fits. That was simply
because the night or two that she was in the work-
house she had not had a fit. The gate-porter re-
fuSed to admit her to the workhouse. She had laid
on the stones for four nights.
Mr. Barker remanded the prisoner for the atten-
dance of the workhouse authorities, and in the
course of the day Mr. Clark, the relieving overseer
of St. Pancras, attended, end said he had not pre-
viously-beard anything of the case. He would at
once take her to the workhouse and make the neces-
sary inquiries about her.
Mr. Barker said that would be the best course to
adopt, and allowed the defendant to be taken to the
workhouse.

SOUTHWARK.—EXTRAORDINARY CHARGE OF
STEALING A BILL OF EXCHANGE FOR £2OO.—A
tall, respectable-looking man, named Henry John-
son, alias W. H. Norrington, alias W. H. Morton,
who described himself as an agent residing in
[Prior-street, Greenwich, was placed in the dock
before Mr. Burcham, charged with stealing a bill
of exhange for £2OO, the property of Henry William
Hayes.
The prosecutor said he was agent to a gentleman
named Clark, for whom he had to pay at times
large sums of money. About a month ago he had a
bill of exchange accepted by Mr. Clark for £2OO,
which he was requested to get discounted for the
purpose of paying off several accounts. Shortly
after the bill was drawn the prisoner was intro-
duced to him in the city as a discounter, and, believ-
ing he was a respectable man, he asked him if he
could get the bill for £2OO discounted. iThe prisoner
said he could, and, after exanlining the bill, put it
into his pocket, promising either to return it or the
money in a few days. The prisoner then left him
with the bill, and he never saw anything more of
him until he gave information to the police.
Mr. Burcham asked where the bill was.
Witness replied that he could not exactly say, but
he believed that the prisoner had negotiated it and
converted the proceeds to his own use. In fact he had
been informed that the prisoner had raised money
on it.

Mr. Burch= asked if be had ever had any pre-
vious money transactions with the prisoner.
Witness replied in the negative, but when intro-
duced to the prisoner he believed him to be a re-
spectable man, and thought that the bill was safe.
Since then he had received information that he was
a bad character, and that be had appropriated sums
of money to his own use, the proceeds of bills of
exchange entrusted to him.
Mr. Alex. Bishop said he had known the prisoner
10 or 12 years. He was sorry to say that he was a
bad character. He generally represented himself
to be a bill discounter. In 1850 he was convicted
for fraudulently obtaining money the property of
the widow of the Hon. and Rev. Mr. Onslow.

Mr. Bureham—What address has the prisoner
given ?
Witness—No. 13, Bonverie-street, Fleet-street.
Mr. Burcham asked what profession witness fol-
lowed.

Witness replied that he was a clergyman of the
Church of England.
Other evidence was gone into, implicating the
names of our leading nobility, and
Mr. Burcham remanded the accused until Monday
next.

WORSHIP-STREET.—MORE INDECENT As•
SAULTS UPON CHILDREN.—A dissipated-looking
young fellow, who gave the name of Thomas Hand,
was placed at the bar before Mr. Leigh charged with
having committed a series of indecent assaults upon
four young girls of the respective ages of 9, 12, 13,
and 9 years.
Caroline Coates, the eldest, and her sister, and
Emily Hurren and her younger sister, all deposed
that they were playing on Hackney-downs, at the
hour of mid-day, when the prisoner first accosted
them, and having coaxed them by all sorts of pro-
mises into a retired part of the downs, he there
commenced a course of conduct toward them too in-
decent and disgusting to be described. Their evi-
dence was however conclusive as to the fact that the
prisoner had committed a criminal assault upon
each of them.

Geo. Wright, a bricklayer, proved having watched
the prisoner a various parts of the downs with the
children, and the commission of grossly indecent
acts with them. Witness spoke to him about it, and
he replied, " Can't I do what I like with my own
cousins P" Witness, however, took him to Inspector
Stacey ; and the girls, when questioned, gave such
testimony ai justified the present charge.
Mr. Williamson, surgeon, of Mildmay-park, said
he had examined the children and found that con-
siderable injuries had been inflicted upon the sisters
Herren, but those upon the sisters Coates were not
of so serious a character.

inspector Stacey said when he received the pri-
soner from the witness Wright he (prisoner) admit-
ted ho was guity of the charges preferred against
him.

Mr. Leigh ordered the prisoner for trial.

WESTMINSTER.—Ester Harmes, a young
woman 21 years of age, servant to Capt. Balfourd,
8, Oakley-street, Chelsea, was charged with attempt.
ing to commit suicide under the following circum-
stances.

James Palls, horse-hair dresser, 7, Ann-street,
Globe-fields, Mile-end, said he and some other
young men had been out on the river for a row on
Tuesday, and were returning about 8 in the evening
when they pit in near Cremorne Gardens to get
some refreshment, and on rowing to the stairs there
observed the prisoner standing upon the edge of
them. As he and his companions rowed u she
jumped into the water, upon which he followedp her
and dragged her out. When he had placed her in
safety upon the bank she begun to cry, and a police-
man coming up a few minutes afterwards, took her
into custody.

Prisoner, a young woman of prepossessing ap-
pearance, who was in tears, said she was extremely
sorry for what she done.
Mr. Arnold said he should remand her till Tues-
day next, not so much with a view to her being
punished, but because he was sure the chaplain of
the House of Detention would put her in a much
better frame of mind than she appeared to be at
present.
After the poor girl's removal to the cells,
receiving
speaking Insp e et Inspector
rt Thbatari
ell :lc t og
intoni
girl's
lys division, said
a view to his
he had been
seem disposed to do so
without, he understood, singleahis
upon the streets.
service,
rgeilral
tb‘ivuvaets l.living,
orphan,annodt
; the poor with
he was fearful she
The master observed ho did
would be thrown
not think it right to
take her back, as he was afraid she would make an-
other attempt upon her life.
Mr. Arcold did not think turning her out of her
situation waS calculated to make her less prone to
repeat the offence4 He hoped Capt. Balfourd would
consider the matter.
Inspector Tarleton said he hoped her muter

would receive her back, as she bore an extremely
good character in every respect. It appeared that
for some time past she had been keeping company
with a young man to whom she was very much at-
tached, and who had suddenly, without any cause,
written to her breaking off all further intercourse
between them. Nothing improper had occurred,
but she had taken this very much to heart, and it
had so affected her as to lead her to the commission
of this crime. He repeated that this poor young
creature was without a single friend in the world
to whom she could confide her troubles, and if she
were, on coming out of prison, to be thrown upon
her own resource, it was not difficult to understand
what the result must be. The mother of the young
man, however, had very kindly offered to take the
girl home until she could find another situation, in
the event of her master declining still to receive
her back.

Mr. Arnold requested the woman in question to
be in attendance next Tuesday, and hoped the pri-
soner's master would alter his determination by that
time.

SYSTEMATIC PLUNDER OF SLIOPRIEEPERS.—T wo
well-dressed girls, named Phoebe Elizabeth Willis
and Elizabeth Lisburn, who have been previously
convieted,iwere re-examined charged with the fol-
lowing robberies :
Mr. Warrand attended to prosecute on behalf of
the association for the Prosecution of Shoplifters,
&c., and Mr. Lewis,. jun., defended the prisoners.
It appeared froth the evidence that on the Ist
inst. the prisoners entered the shop of Harvey,
Nicholl, and Co., 10, Lowndes-terrace, Knights-
bridge, and asked to be shown some silk dresses.
The assistant, Eli Brown, had reason to suspect
that they wews dishonest persons, and turning his
back to get them a particular dress they pointed
out, on returning he missed a roll of silk, and called
the attention of Mr. Carruthers, one of the firm, to
the circumstance, upon which that gentleman called
them into the counting-house,during their progress
to which a roll containing 751 yards of lavender
silk, value £l7, was observed to fall on the floor
from under the dress of Willis, who, Brown ob-
served, had a large slit measuring about 8 inches
long in the front of her dress. Prisoners were then
given into custody, and remanded, alleging that
there was a mistake somewhere.

On their being brought up again several assis-
tants from large houses were present who strongly
suspected them of having visited their employers'
establishments ; and a second case was preferred
against them', in which it appeared, from the testi-
mony of William Arnold, that on the 20th of De-
cember last the prisoners and another woman went
to Stagg and Mantle's, in Leicester-square, where
Willis wanted a plaid shawl, similar to one worn
by Lisburn. They had not one of that pattern,
upon which they selected a shawl valued at £7
155., and paying a deposit of 18s. upon it, left,
stating that they would call again next day and
take the shawl, if the assistant (Arnold) could not
get such a one as they wanted. Arnold, however,
also had his suspicions of them, .and followed them
into a public-house, and thence to Broad-street,
Bloomsbury, where he lost sight of them. The as-
sistant's ingenuity was now somewhat remarkable,
for going next morning to the public-house, he exa-
mined the sweepings of the passage, just as the ser-
vant was about to throw them in the dust-hole, and
there he found the bill he hadgiven them on part pur-
chasing the shawl torn to pieces, and with it two
tickets with his employer's marks on,and on examin-
ing the goods in the shop two shawls were miss-
ing, corresponding with the tickets, of the respec-
tive value of £3 9s. 6d. and 19s. 9d.
Mr, Lewis did not weaken the case by his cross-
examination, and the prisoners were remanded,
previous to their being committed far. trial.

THAMES.—DESPERATE ATTEMPT TO MURDER
A BROTHER-IN-LAW.—John Clay was charged with
committing a murderous assault upon his brother ,
in-law. The inquiry excited considerable interest,
and Mr. Charles Young, solicitor, of Arbour-street,
conducted the prosecution.
The learned gentleman, in opening the case, said
that his client, as would be seen by the wound upon
his head and the bandages that had been used to stop
the blood, had been frightfully cut by the prisoner
at the bar, the husband of the prosecutor's sister.'
From the instructions he had received there is not
the shadow of a doubt that had not his client been
a more powerful man than the prisoner he must
haVe been murdered. Notwithstanding the mur-
derous assault committed upon his client, out of
feeling for his sister, he did not wish to press the
case too severely. He, should therefore call the
prosecutor to give his evidence, without taking up
any further time of the magistrate.
Mr. Henry Howard was then sworn, and stated
that he had been staying at the house of the pri-
soner's wife, witness's sister, for some time, as a
protection to the house, as her husband did not live
with her.
Mr. Young—What was the name of the house ?
Witness—The house was termed Colchester House
and was situated at Poplar.
Mr. Young—How came you to be in the house ?
Witness—At my sister's particular request.
Mr. Young—Explain to the magistrate whether
you were sleeping in the house last night, and, if
so, what took place.
The prosecutor said that he was sleeping in the
second floor, over his sister's bedroom, and about 1
o'clock that morning he was alarmed by a loud
noise at his bedroom-door, when, in an instant, the
prisoner smashed in one of the panels of his bed-
room-door, and, having entered through the aper-
ture with a cutlass in hand, he inflicted the wound
which he bore upon his head, and which his wor-
ship could plaibly see.
Mr. Young—Was the prisoner drunk or sober at
the time do you know ?
Witness—He was sober.
Mr. Young —Was it at your sister's particular
request that you slept in the house ?
Witness—lt was for a protection to her.
Mr. Young-7-How did you first know that the
prisoner was in the house ? Let me first ask you if
he resided there ?
Prosecutor--:-He did not, reside in Colchester
House, but somewhere at West Ham, and my first
knowledge of the prisoner having entered the
house was by hearing a scuffling and cries of
" Murder !" I think, and directly afterwards the
door of my bedroom was split asunder and the pri-
soner entered with the cutlass in hand and com-
menced cutting at me.
Mr. Young —What did you next do ?
Witness—l got out of bed and closed with the
prisoner, and both fell, and at last I found myself
bleeding on the landing.
Mr. Young—Did he attempt to make more than
one attack on you ?
Witness—l think he did, as I found the flooring
out on the landing, as if the weapon had been
directed with great force against my head, and
having missed my head, had entered in the flooring
of the landing.
The prisoner said that he would admit the
assault, and he would ask the prosecutor whether
he had forbidden him to enter the house ?

The prosecutor said that such was the case, but
at his sister's request he felt bound to go to the
place as a protection towards her. He (witness)
rhad never been separated from his wife for getting
drunk. His wife never refused to live with him on
account of his getting repeatedly drunk.
John Sergeant, police-officer 56 K, said that
between twelve and one o'cloclr, whilst on duty, he
heard cries of murder proceeding from Colchester
House, Poplar. He went into the house and saw
the prisoner and the prosecutor struggling together.
He separated them, and took the accused into
custody.
Mr. Young—Did the prisoner say anything. when
you took him into custody ?
The constable said yes; he said he had only done
what a man had a perfect right to do in his own
house.

Mr. Young said he should like it to be distinctly
known, atter what the prisoner had stated, that any
man had a right to do as he had done in his own
house, when it should he stated that he did not re-
side there.

Mr. Matthew Brownfield, divisional surgeon to
the Poplar subdivision of the K police, of 3, Escott-
place, East India-road, said that at a quarter past
one in the morning he was called upon to attend the
prosecutor, whom be found bleeding and suffering
from an incised wound on the temple, two inches
in length, and the bone was injured. The wound
had divided the temporal artery, which caused a
great loss of blood. Witness dressed the wound.
Mr. Selfe— Was the wound of a dangerous nature?
Witness—l should say it was.
The prisoner, although duly cautioned by the ma-
gistrate, in extenuation of his crime, persisted in
making a long rambling statement, in which he
stated that at the death of his wife's father a deal
of enmity had existed between the prosecutor and
himself. At his death the sons called in an auc-
tioneer and sold everything off without consulting
him or his wife. After that they had the North
Woolwich Plate Glass Works, which ended by their
being burned down. They got £6OO insurance
money, and he had never received anything from
that day to the present. He had forbidden prose-
cutor to enter his house, for which he paid £45
Per year, but by living in his wife's house he had
no rent to pay, and upon his going to his house he
ordered him to leave, and he went into his room to
turn him out, and bringing him down stairs he went
to get his clothes, and as ho insisted upon it, he
told him if he did not go down he would kill him,
and he struck him with the sword.
Fully committed to Newgate for trial.

Mr. Bishop, the Englishman arrested for con-
veying Bourbonist communications between Naples and
Roue, has been gentouced to 19 you' iraprimaiwat.