The Sun.
London, England, 1862-04-26 00:00:00

BOURTON. ON- THE-WATER RAILWAY,
Branch of " Midland " with Oxford and Great
Western. Westminster County Court. CHARLES
ACKERLEY, R.N., v. COLE, Solicitor, 36, Essex-street.
—23 d March, 1862.—N0t being favoured by a report of
this case, we are at fault in not being able to give the sum
and substance in this suit by Plaintiff for loss of time at the
office of Defendant, by own request,—not in conformity
with the Master of the R-)11's decree or petition—touching
the above Railway and other matters—Requiring under
the Standing Orders of the Peers and Legislature enact-
ments three clear weeks' notice in the Gloucester papers.
The plaintiff's witness,RalphDisraeli (son of Benjamin,
the ex-Chancellor of the Exchequer), the Registrar of the
Roll's Court, on being placed in the witness-box, gave in
an extract from his "Term day book," that the judgment
was given on the 15th of March, 1862; the which, by the
plaintiff's shewing, the Gloucester journals of the Ist, Bth,
and 15th—was wanting six days of the twenty-one—
whereby plaintiff's name being in the same Act,
1 and 2 William IV., No. 54,* with his brother, Joseph
Chamberlayne—buth 'to sue and be sued under one
Christian and one Sirename'—made it imperative, and, as
admitted by defendant—a "sine qua non" for giving se-
curity to the shareholders. Yet—on cro:s-examination by
Cole (defendant), Lie want of courtesy to the plaintiff pro-
ceeded from his opinion that he was "a troublesome fellow,"
This case (No. 3,465), so peculiar in its views against the
family, solicitor as also of the Earl of Radnor and Dean of
Gloster, as trustees, controling in fact "the College of Ad-
vocates" as benchers of the four inns of court, under a county
Court summons and supcena fees for entering plaint and
hearing, ss. Sd., out-Herods even the civil law process of
the Justinian code retrospections, on suit for less of Plain-
tiff's time (as a Merchant patentee) by Defendant's own
letters was not admitted by the Judge, thus occasioning a
re-hearing of the case.—Costs for defendant, 15s.
Note.—This Act of 1832 is the only one in which two
brothers, one in the Royal Artillery. and the other (plain-
tiff) in the Royal Navy, sworn in as the * State " Nulla ' 0'
to the Catholic Emancipation Act of 1829—for making
them by the 15th clause " a lay body corporate" (or as the
French express it, ' faisant partea d'une corporation secu-
liere')—as on the primitif tenets of Christianity—whence
opposition of the War-office and Admiralty, &c., by refus-
ing to strike out of the Army and Navy lists the double and
treble Christian names of fashionable and heraldic import.

* By the first and third clauses of the Bourton Railroad
Company (on their unregistered inclosure award) they are
made to forestall the four-miles circumference of the Stow
Market tolls—with the judicial position of its King's Post
Magistrate, under a committee of foreigners in violation of
" the Adam and Eve consorted" of 1822, for the criminal
basis of the colonial common law, for all under this sworn
power of the one State Arbiter, by clause 29 of its rider, 8
Vic., c. 18—he being ' Prince Consort,' with Ind. lady.

TREAT It E-RO YA 1 , HAYMARKET,
Lesse Mr. J B. Buckstone.

THIS EVENING, JOHN JONES.
After which, at half-past 7, will be performed (107th time)
OUR AMERICAN COUSIN. Asa Trenchard, Mr. Buck-
stone ; Lord Dundreary, Mr. Sothern.
Followed by the Spanish Ballet entitied THE STAR OF
ANDALUSIA. Senora Pcrea Nena, Senor Ricardo, and the
Corps de Ballet.
To conclude with MY HUSBAND'S GHOST.

Commence a• 7.