The Sun.
London, England, 1865-06-13 00:00:00

ThAMES.

CHOPPING AGAINST CHOPPING—MATRIMONIAL FETID.—
William Chopping, a very big man, was brought before
Mr. Paget charged with beating his wife, Mary Ann, whose
face and forehead were covered with bruises, and whose
oyes were blackened.
The wife, who carried a baby in her arms, said her
husband came home last night and thrashed her. He gave
her two black eyes and knocked her down, but she did not
wish to punish him, only to bind him over to keep the
peace.
Mr. Paget—How long have you been married ?
Witness—Six years.

Mr. Paget—Has he been a good husband ?
Witness—A pretty good husband.
Mr. Paget—l am very sorry he could so far have for-
gotten himself as to commit such an outrage as this and
mark your face in that dreadful manner. It is very dis-
graceful indeed. He, has been a pretty good husband for
six years, and he has now broken out in this way, and
given you two black eyes. I suppose he was drunk.
Witness—No, sir; quite sober. •
Mr. Paget—Do you think you can take his word not to
do this again ?

The wife, with great unconcern said, " He can do as ho
likes, sir. He has himself to blame."
Mr. Paget asked the prisoner what he had to say?
• The prisoner—l did not wish to hit her, but she gave
me a swelled lip first.
Mr. Paget—ls that true, woman ?
The wife—Yes, I believe so.
The husband—She knows it to bo true.
Mr. Paget—You have ill-used her, very badly indeed.
The prisoner was then bound over in the sum of £2O, to
keep the peace to his wife for six months.

BURGLARY AND EXTENSIVE ROBBERY.—John Spicer,
rigger and stevedore, and William John Parry, general
dealer, were brought before Mr. Paget, charged with felo-
niously and burglariously breaking and entering a ware-
house in Old Gravel-lane, St. George-in-the-East, and
stealing 35 bolts of canvas, valued at £lO5, the property of
Rowland Gifford and Co., rope, twine, and canvas factors,
of No. 72, Mark lane.

Mr. Charles Young, solicitor, conducted the prosecution.
Mr. Joseph Smith, solicitor, defended Spicer.
Messrs. Gifford's warehouse was broken open between
half-past two o'clock on Friday afternoon and the follow-
ing day at noon. The warehouse was plundered of 40
bolts of canvas, each valued at about 50s. The prisoners
hired a room on Saturday afternoon of Mr. Robert Roger
Rollo, the landlord of the White Swan, Wapping-wall,
in which they deposited 35 bolts of canvas. The prisoners
came to the White Swan yesterday evening, while a police
constable named William Beckley, 344 K, was there, and
were taken into custody. 'l'7lo 35 bolts of canvas were
identified as the property of Messrs. Gifford. The other
five have not been recovered.
Mr. Paget remanded the prisoners for a week.

SHIPPING INTELLIGENCE—This clay.

_e

LoNpox, June 13.—Wind this day at noon—North-
Easterly; moderate breeze and fine weather.
CLYDE, June 12.—Wind, S.W.—Arrived—Elizabeth
Cannon, from St. John's, N.B.
FALMOUTH, June 11.—Wind S.E.—Arrived—Xanthe,
screw steamer, from Sydney. Sailed—Chloss, for New
York.

_
NEWPOIt; Juno 12.—Wind S.W.—Arrived—Julia, from
Liverpool for Vera Cruz.

SOUTHAMPTON, June 12.--Wind S.W.—Sailed—Ceylon,
screw steamer, for Alexandria.
CARDIFF, June 12.—Wind B.W.—Arrived--Mary Ann
Holman, from Caldera. Sailed—Charles Jackson, for
Valparaiso. "

QUEENSTOWN, Juno 12.--Wind S.W.—Arrived—City
of Manchester, screw steamer, from Liverpool for New
York.

i'LYmouTu, June 12.--Wind S.W.—Arrived—Sarah
Arden, from Matanzas.

WATEILFORD, June 12. Wind S.W.—Arrived—Atlas,
steamer, from Sulima.

SUNDERLAND, June 1.2.—Wind N.W.—Sailed—Novara,
for Hong Kong.

BRISTOL June 12.—Wind W.— Arrived. Bonny Mary,
from Rio Janeiro.

BY MAGNETIC TELEGRAPH.

Arrived, June 12—Cashuka,
GRAVESEND, Tuesday,Norning.
steamer, from Dunkirk.
Arrived, June 13 —Delta, steamer, from St. Petersburg.
DEAL, Tuesday Morning.
Gabain, from New York; Anothe, from Sydney;
from Gofle ; Sir R. Peel,
Passed—Ocean Nymph, from London for Hudson's Ba
William of Exeter and Bedifort, from West, for North;
from Alexandria—all for London. Ariadno,

RACING FIXTI
Ascot .... ...... au:
. . ... . 13
Beverley, Mull, and East
Riding ..................... 14
Liverpool .................. 19
Hampton ..................... 21
JU
Newmarket July ......... 4
Carlisle ..................... 4
Jersey
ster .. . ........................ 5
Worce ................ .. 6
Pontefract .................. 10
Abingdon .................. 11
Stamford .............. . ...... 13
Hungerford ... .. ............ 13

"RES FOR 1865,

NE.
Newton
Newcastle
Odiham
Bibury
Stockbridge
rLY.

• New Forest Hunt l4
Nottingham
Winchester lB
Southampton l9
Chesterfield
Cambridge 2O
Aldershot Camp 2O, 21
Goodwo
rysz

iirighton AUG 1
Brighton Club
Knutsford 3
Lewes 4
Huntingdon
Wolverhampton
Paisley
Reading ..
Radcliffe l4
Egham l5
Stockton l6

Oxiord l7
York
Great Yarmout It 22
24
Pmouth
Lic lyhfield 2B
Devon and Exeter 29
Tunbridge 3O
Derby Summer 3O
Ipswich
Weymouth 3l

SEPTE
Warwick
Leicester 7
Dover
Hereford
Doncaster
Brecon lB
Richmond

Canterbury l9
Hendon (Welsh Harp) 2l
Monmouth 2l
Manchester Autumn
Walsall
Newmarket Ist Oct 26
7
Laualt

A man named Reilly was brought up at Bow-
street Police-court yesterday charged with threaten-
ing Baron Martin. It seems that Reilly was plaintiff in
an action for libel tried before Baron Martin some time
ago. A verdict was given for the defendant, and this ver-
dict on appeal was sustained by the full court. Reilly
appears to have thought that injustice had been done to
him, and he • has followed Baron Martin about and
threatened him on various occasions. Yesterday morning
he stopped the judge in the street and again accused him
of injustice. A policeman who was near took Reilly into
custody. He was ordered by the magistrate to find sureties
to keep the peace for twelve months.
THE ROUPELL FORGERIES.—The Roupell for-
geries are to be revived at the approaching assizes
at Chelmsford. The case to be tried was originally brought
to recover an estate near Rumford, Mr. Roupell, the heir-
at-law, being the plaintiff. He sought to recover the pro-
p.orty on the ground that a deed of gift, under which the
estate had been conveyed to William Roupell during the
lifetime of his father, was a forgery. William Roupell,
formerly M.P. for Lambeth, will be put in the witness-box,
as he was on a previous occasion, to prove the forgery.
The property in question amounts to about £300,000, and
the point raised is whether the late M.P. is telling the truth
or says the signature is a forgery. If the
plaintiff notw
shnheoubl de
obtain a verdict in his favour the necessary
result will bo that the whole of the vast property made,
away with by Mr. Roupell will revert to his family, and
those who have paid their money for it will lose it.