The Sun.
London, England, 1862-03-13 00:00:00

E VETNIN G, 01-1,4 13, 1862.

NORTHERN CIRCUIT—YORK, March 10.
CROWN SIDE.
(Before Mr. Justice Mellor.)
George Evans and William Lux were indicted for
cutting and wounding William Molesbury, in the
county constabulary, at Ecclesfield, on the 12th of
December last, with intent to main and disfigure
him and to do him some grievous bodily harm.
Mr. Blanshard and Mr. Gully prosecuted ; Mr.
Campbell Foster defended the prisoner Evans, and
Mr. V. Blackburn the other prisoner.
It appeared that on the night of Dec. 12, about
12 o'clock, the prosecutor, William Molesbury, one
of the county constabulary, was on duty in the
neighbourhood of Aldwark-hall, a mile or two south
of Rotherham, in company with a policeman named
Boulton. They had each their staves, and were
armed in addition with cutlasses. They heard the
voices of men approaching, and concealed themselves
in a shed. They saw three men advancing on the
road leading from Derbyshire, each carrying a large
bundle. Suspecting them not to have come honestly
by what they were carrying, they rushed out upon
them as they approached and demanded of the pri-
soner Evans what his bundle contained. Evans
replied that the officers should not take either him
or his bundle. At this time the two officers had
each hold of him by the collar of his coat, and he
struck at Molesbury with his fist and knocked him
down. Evans closed with him and threw him,
and the two men rolled over and over on the
ground. At this time the other officer had gone
off in pursuit of the prisoner Lux, who had run
away. The two men continued struggling on the
ground until the prosecutor succeeded in getting
uppermost and both got up, the policeman imme-
diately seizing hold of the prisoner, when, according
to the prosecutor's statement, the prisoner seized
hold of his cutlass, which was hanging in the
scabbard at his left side, and, drawing it, began to
cut away at the prosecutor over the head and arms
with it. The prosecutor cried out for_ assistance,
and his comrade returned to his aid, and then found
the prisoner seated on the top of the prosecutor,
whom he had knocked down, hacking away at his
head with the cutlass. Boulton aimed a blow at
him with his staff, which knocked him off the
prosecutor, and then a third man came up and
engaged with Boulton, and they tad a set to,
Boulton with his cutlass and the third' man with a
hedge stake. The prosecutor 'd the prisoner
Evans then had a long struggle for the cutlass.
At length, Boulton having freed himself from
his antagonist, the two policemen contrived
to overpower and secure the prisoner Evans.
The prosecutor was found to be severely wounded
about the head and arms, and covered with blood.
The prisoner had also three wounds on his head,
cut to the bone, and a wound on his arm, and was
covered with blood. The prisoner Lux was after-
wards apprehended.
On the part of Lux' it was submitted that there
was no evidence that he had attacked the police-
men, or that he had a common purpose with those
who had, as he had run away as soon as the fight
commenced.

A verdict of acquittal was directed as regarded
Lux, but Evans was found guilty of unlawfully
wounding, and was sentenced to 18 months' im-
prisonment with hard labour.
CIVIL SIDE.
(Before Mr. Justice Willes.)
KAY AND WIFE V. BERRY.

This was an action for an assault.
Mr. Cole appeared for the plaintiffs, and Mr
Overend, Q C., for the defendant. _ _

The plaintiff is the landlord of the Sun Inn, at
Huddersfield, adjoining to which is a small dram-
shop, in which his wife usually served customers.
The defendant, in company with some friends, came
in on the evening of the 9th of January, and called
for some drink, and when he was served with it
he asked for the master, and said he was " a thief,"
and then used very abusive and insulting language
to Mrs. Kay, attributing loose conduct to her. He
then seized her by the arm and tried to lift her
over the counter, and otherwise assaulted her, and
she, having recently been confined, suffered consi-
derably by the assault.
In cross examination Mrs. Kay-stoutly denied
having used any strong language or' struck first,
and only admitted having " nipped up the cork-
crusher" to make use of it in self-defence if it
should have become necessary.
The defence was that the order of things was
reversed, and that the strong language and vio•
lence were commenced by the female plaintiff, who
was enraged at being told by the defendant that
her husband had lost £7 in betting, and thereupon
called him a thief. Witnesses were called to sup-
port that view of the case.
The jury found a verdict for the plaintiff.—
Damages, 40s.

MIDLAND CIRCUIT.—NOTTINGTIAM, March 11.

NISI PRIUS COURT.
(Before Mr. Justice Williams.)
ROYLE, CLERIC, V. WARD.

Mr. Macaulay, Q.C., and Mr. O'Brien were coun-
sel for the plaintiff; Mr. Boden, Q.C., and Mr.
Bristowe for the defendant.

This was an action brought for slanderous words
spoken of the plaintiff by the defendant, nominally
to recover damages, but in reality to vindicate the
character of the plaintiff against the statements
made by the defendant of his having taken indecent
liberties with her.

The plaintiff, who is 47 years of age, was vicar
and perpetual curate of Wellow, where he resided
with his wife, three daughters, and a son, aged 14,
and one servant, the defendant, Emma Ward, who
had been in his service eight months at the time of
the alleged slander.
From the statements of counsel and the evidence
in support of them, it appeared that Mrs. Royle had
occasion to leave home on Friday, Oct. 4, to take
her daughters to school. She returned on Sunday,
the 6th. On Monday, Oct. 21, a cricket match was
played at Wellow, and at 3 o'clock that afternoon
Mrs. Royle gave the defendant leave to go and see
the match for an hour or two. She went, but in-
stead of returning after the match, she went to a
dance at the Durham Ox Inn, and did not return
until 9 p.m. Mrs. Royle told the defendant that
she ought to he ashamed of her conduct, and chided
her. The defendant made no reply, nor did she say
anything in the way of complaint of Mr. Hoyle
until the Tuesday following, whon Mrs. Royle told
her that she should inform the defendant's mother
of her ill-behaviour. Mrs. Royle accordingly went
to the girl's mother and spoke to her about the
girl's misconduct, and on returning, about half-past
5, found the defendant dressed in her Sunday's
best, as if going out. Mrs. Royle bade her
bring in the key of the kitchen door and the lamp.
She brought in the lamp, but not the key, and
putting on her bonnet, went off to the Durham Os,
where she remained dancing, au the village feast
was still going on. About 8 o'clock a man named
Newham Came by Mrs, Royle's desire, and bade her

come home. She replied that she should not, alleg-
ing, as he said, no reason, though, according to her
own evidence, she had added that she had her rea-
son, although die did not declare them. Mrs. R,oyle
kept the gate open for her till le') at night, but the
girl did not return, but continued dancing until 1
o'clock in the morning, and passed the night at the
house of Anne Moore, daughter of the parish clerk,
lying down upon her bed without undressing. Be-
tween 12 and 1 on the following day she went to
Mrs. Royle's, and told her she had come for her
boxes and wages. Mrs. Boyle bade her stop, and
put her hand across the door to prevent her passing.
The defendant said, "It is time I left. I went 'on
account of my character." Mrs. Boyle answered,
"Stop, Emma; if you have anything to say bring
your mother with you. The defendant said that
her master had tried to get into her room. On Thurs-
day she returned with her mother, and repeated
the charges she had previously made of the plaintiff
having taken liberties with her, but not alleging
; actual commerce with her. Mr. Boyle laid a writ-
ten retractation before her, which he required her to
sign, but she refused to do so, saying she would not
make him an innocent man when he was a guilty
one. Mr. Boyle then told her that he must see fur-
ther into the matter. Mr. Boyle, in consequence of
her persistence in her story, commenced an action.
On the part of the plaintiff it was insisted that the
story told by the defendant was differently told to
different persons, and that the silence she main-
tained respecting it for three weeks after the alleged
occurrence of the first indecent liberties, and then
only making it when she was in disgrace, rendered
her statement altogether untrustworthy.
The statement made to Mrs. Royle and to others
was that Mr. Boyle had on the night of Friday,
the 4th of October, when Mrs. Royle had gone
to London, told her when she brought him the
keys, accotding to custom, that he should come
to her bed that nights After this overture, to
which it did not seem that she had made any reply,
she said that she went to bed and listened for Mr.
Boyle coming up, and, having heard him make fast
his door, she thought all was right, undressed, got
into bed, and fell asleep. She was awakened, she
said, by some one getting into her bed, and upon
screaming Mr. Boyle said to her, " It's only me,
Emma." She left the bed and went into the young
ladies' bedroom and locked herself in. Her bed-
chamber, it seemed, consisted of a portion of a
room, divided by a partition, the inner portion of
Which was her apartment, the other through which
she must pass to reach her own, being the young
ladies' room, the door of which opened on a landing
opposite to the door of the plaintiff. The door of
the young ladies' room had a lock and key, but that
of defendant, which was in the partition, formed of
posts, laths, and canvass, wasronly fastened by two
door large buttons. The latter was the only one
she fastened, the ;outer door of the ladies' empty
room being left unlocked. On the following day
she said that Mr. Boyle asked her whether she had
seen the slit he had made in the canvass to undo
the buttons of the door, meaning, as she added, that
she should sew it up. When the church Wardens
came to investigate the case this slit was examined,
at Mrs. Royle's request, as she thought it too small
to admit a man's hand, but it appeared to be large
enough, and so situated as to allow of the introduc-
tion of the hand for that purpose. In the statement,
however, which she said she was ready to substan-
tiate on oath, it was affirmed that Mr. Royle had
fully effected his purpose.
Mr. Boyle denied on oath that there was any
truth in the imputations made by the defendant.
Mr. Boden addressed the jury, and contended
that there were no such discrepancies in her state-
ments as should lead them to discredit her. The
son, who was 14 years old, who slept with his
father, might have been called ; he was the only
one in the house besides the plaintiff and the de.
fendant. It was for the jury to say whether an
ignorant girl like the defendant had, or was likely
to have, fabricated a story which, if false, was so
likely to be detected, and for the fabrication of
which there was no apparent motive of either gain
or ill. feeling, which was in several circumstances
corroborated, and to which, in spite of the threat
and institution of proceedings, she had constantly
adhered. _ _ _ .

Mr. Macaulay addressed the jury in reply. There
was not one atom of corroboration or of probability
in the story. %Vas she brought before them as a
modest girl? How, then, was that consistent with
with her having been violated on the 4th of Octo-
ber, and held her tongue till the 23d, when she was
in disgrace ? If she was admitted to be a girl of
loose morals, what reliance could be placed on her
statement ?

His Lordship then commented on the evidence,
and pointed out the question which the jury had to
determine. The jury retired and, after a short ab.
sence, returned a verdict for the plaintiff, with is.
damages.
His Lordship, upon an application for costs, at
once expressed his willingness to certify.
The Lord Chief Justice Cockburn sat at 10 o'clock
in the Crown Court, and proceeded with the trial of
prisoners.

Charles Marsh and Adam Marsh, bricklayers,
Martin Wilkinson, a sawyer, John Jackson, a boat-
man, and George Jeffrey, labourer, were placed at
the bar, charged with night poaching upon land in
the possession of John Whiteley, at West Drayton,
on the night of the 22d of November, being armed
with bludgeons and stones.
Mr. F. Stephen conducted the case for the prose-
cution ; the Hon. C. Leigh the case for the pri-
soners.
It appeared from the evidence that John Cardill,
Joseph Cardill, and William Jackson, keepers in
the service of his Grace the Duke of Newcastle,
were watching at Drayton on the night of the 22d
of November when they heard the squeal of a hare,
and going through a hedge near a plantation into
a field, called Whiteley's field they saw several
poachers. The keepers approached and were struck
at by the poachers, who were the more powerful
body, being six or seven is number, and who, after
pelting the keepers with stones and bringing them
to the ground, beat them very severely with sticks
and net-pegs about their heads, necks,and shoulders.
One of the gang of poachers gave evidence of their
proceedings in the course of the night in question,
and was corroborated by persons who met him on
the same night.
All the prisoners were found guilty, and were
sentenced to seven years penal servitude.
(Before Lord Chief Justice Cockburn.)
Francis Fretwell was placed at the bar, charged
upon an indictment and also upon the coroner's in-
quest with the wilful murder of Elizabeth Bradley,
at Bilborough, on 24th July last, and pleaded not
guilty.
Mr. Cave conducted the prosecution ; Mr. O'Brien
the defence.

Both the prisoner and deceased were in humble
circumstances. The deceased was a married woman
who had separated from her husband, and at the
time when the offence was alleged to have been
committed was living in service with a Mr. Towle,
a farmer at Bilborough. There had previously been
an intimacy between herself and the prisoner, who
was in service with Mr. Richardson, a neighbouring
farmer, and this intimacy resulted in her pregnancy.
The prisoner, with her full assent, if not at her sug-
gestion and by her desire, procured some white
powder, which he gave her, telling her that it was
to get rid of the child, and that she was to be care-
ful of it and take a little at a time. She took it in
gin, and was sick, and subsequently dangerously ill.
In the course of her illness she made statements re-
specting its cause, which led to the prisoner being
taken into custody upon the charge of having ad-
ministered corrosive sublimate with intent to pro-
cure abortion. On the 22d July an examination of
deceased by magistrates was taken in the presence
of the prisoner and his attorney. Questions put by
the prisoner in eross..examination of the deceased
elicited that the deceased had herself desired to have
some drug for the like purpose, and bad endea-
voured to purchase corrosive sublimate and oil of
savin, and that the prisoner's procuring it was with
her assent, if not at her request. She died on the
24th July, from the effects of poison, which the me-
dical evidence showed was corrosive sublimate.
Upon Mr. Cave's proposing to put in the deposi-
tion of Elizabeth Bradley, the deceased,
Mr. O'Brien objected, upon the ground that her
statement did not refer to the charge now alleged
against the prisoner. The admissibility of the de-
position depended on his having had both opportu-
nity and capacity to cross-examine with reference
to the charge.

The Lord Chief Justice regarded the case as ana-
logous to that of a charge of wounding with intent
to maim, upon which the examination of the
wounded man might be taken, and the prisoner
afterwards, in consequence of the wounded man's
death, being charged with murder, the depositions
would be admissible as relating to one and the same
transaction.

The deposition was then put in evidence and read.
At the conclusion of the case for the prosecution,
Mr. O'Brien submitted that there was no evidence
for the jury to support the charge of wilful murder.
Previously to the act enabling accessories to be tried
as principals the prisoner could not have been put
upon his alai for the offence now charged. The
prisoner therefore, as being accessory to the act of
the woman, which was not at that time felonious,
did not by her death become liable to answer a
charge of murder. He contended, as a matter of
fact, that the prisoner did not cause the woman to
take the drug, but that she was acting throughout
of her own will, and that, so far from being influ-
enced or persuaded by the prisoner, was herself
urging and influencing him.
His Lordship then told the jury that it was not
suggested that the prisoner had any intention. to
came the death of the deceased woman; but if they

were of opinion that he caused the drug .to
he'
be aa-
ministered v,ith a view to procure abortion, eild t
woman died, then he was guilty of murder in the
eye of the law. Did he cause it to be taken ? 171 e
mere act of procuring did not amount to causing
her to take it ; there must be something more. It
was one thing to procure it, and another thing di-
rectly or indirectly to counsel and its,duce, and by
influence over her to cause it to be tak:ner, lr,• Nvas be-
not necessary that he should hand it to h.
ing art and part in her act, he advised aid induced
her to
her to take it. If he advised and counselled
take it to get rid of the child, he caused her to take
it, and, if death resulted, was guilty of mu'rder"
His lordship obsei'ved upon the disadvantage' at
which the prisoner was placed when before t;4l°
magistrate at the time when the deceased made her
deposition, the charge then being of a less serious
kind than now, and the prisoner unassisted by an
adviser skilled in cross-examination, and dealing,
,
too, with a witness who was, morally speaking, ell
accomplice, suffering from poison, and .oppressedr
no doubt, with a sense of heavy moral ,wd legal
guilt. However merciful he might wish to be' to the
I deceased, he must, in justice to the prisoner, eel
that her statements were inconsistent, and she L'ad'
though quite as guilty as the prisoner, if not more
so, endeavoured to throw the burden of it upon hint:-
His lordship commented in detail on the conflict
of
her statements, and censured the conduct of a police.
man who had endeavoured, by questioning the
ft pri.:
boner, to obtain evidence against him. He le 1!,
for the jury to say whether the prisoner procure.ct
the drug and caused the deceased to take it, aodt
not, to say whether the prisoner procured the pois.lll'
knowing the purpose for which she wanted it,
which case he would be an accessory before the
fact to the woman's administering the drug to her'
self, which would be a misdemeanour at common
law ; if so, he should direct them that, her death
ensuing, she was felo-de-se, and the question of la°
which he should reserve would lie whether, as
accessory before the fact to a common law msof:
meanour, which by the woman's own act ended 1"
felony, he did not become guilty of legal mur
Bonet
The jury found specially—first, that the pr
did not procure and cause the deceased to take the
drug ; and, secondly, that he was accessory before
the fact to the common law misdemeanour.
His Lordship said that he should reserve tie
question whether the finding of the jury amountut
in accordance with his direction, to one of murder,.
and respited the sentence, informing the prison°
that, so far as it lay with him to say so, he nee for,
be
under no apprehension that his life would be O
feited.

NORTH WALES CIRCUIT.—WELsHroar
March 11.
The commission was opened on Monday, at Welsh;
pool, by Mr. Justice Keating, and the court opene.u:
for business on Tuesday morning at ten o'clock
There were only five prisoners for trial, includia
one indictment for wilful murder.
Ishmael Jones was charged with the wilful flll
der of his wife at Llanfair on the 30th December last;
The principal evidence against him was furnisbeu:
by himself, in consequence of communications b°
had made to several persons, who, of course, fir,
geared as evidence against him. It appeared tbs.*
jealousy was the cause of the fatal act. The p
rig
soner suspected that a neighbour named Evan Evticp
1
was on terms of too great intimacy with his Vilo
and on the day in question he was in a field near
the road which led from Evans's house to his ovilif
where he saw him and his (Jones's) wife walking
and talking together, and also overheard some CO
versation about kisses, which was explained 11
Evans to have had reference to another man
woman who were a little before them on the l°,laed
According to the prisoner's own statement, he eel- e,
to his wife over the hedge and told her to cot%
home and get him some dinner. She then left EvlTit
and went home, her husband following, She ora
down the garden to get some potatoes from a J.,,,°
or tump, and there the murderous act was 07;
mitted. The husband had taken the spade fr°eo
her, and struck her several times, causing Or
deep wounds in her skull, which the medical atter
dant considered would produce almost instant dot
The alleged intimacy was strongly denied by B"13,::
A plea was attempted to be set up that the PI;
soner had been in a desponding state of mind I°o
some time, and was subject to delusions ; but t e
medical attendant, in reply to the learned judgj
stated that he had known him for a long time, tuld.,
had no reason to believe that there was any uneuu°
ness of mind.
putt
spicuity, lordship summed up with great care an,-,i.,rt
spicuity, and the jury, after an absence from Co of
of three quarters of an hour, returned a verdiet,,li
wilful murder, accompanied' by a recommendativ
to mercy.
Sentence of death was passed upon him.

COUN7BY

,V-

SHEFFIELD—MARCH 11. but
At our market this morning there was less firmest,' ill
wheat quotations were at the rates of last week. Oats to
fair demand, and prices quite as dear. Malting barley
higher. 22s Od
Red wheat, per lead of 3 imperial bushels...2os Od to „,_ Ad
White 71 , ...22s Od to 2,"!de'd
New red , , • • .21s Od to 2,0_„,,
New white ~ 1, ...248 Od to 20 it
Beans ff ff •••51485s
00dd
ttoo 1595: Fid
Peas, per qr
Grindmg barley, per qr 328 Od to 366 ~2
Malting ditto, „ 36s Od to 396 n"
Oats 23s Od to 36s '.;
Millers' prices for flour-2s id, 28 3d, and 2s 5d r
141 b.

LEEDS—MAncu 11. The
We have to report fair arrivals of grain this week.,. joe
show of wheat to-day was larger than of late, the coal 18
very moderate, and in order to make sales a declined() to.
per qr from last Tuesday's rates had to be submitte AJo
Beans and oats sold slowly. Malting barley scarce, 611"
favour of sellers.

MELTON MOWBRAY—MincH 11.
witb
There was a small supply of wheat to-day, end/ s
a quiet trade, prices as high as last week. Barley 00
moderate request, at previous prices. White wheat:ooo
Od to 65s Od; red, :57s Od to 64s per 36 stone; 38 et.:;
slow, at 31s to 48s for old; new sorts, —s Per fa
cl
barley, 35s]to 39s for malting, and 31s to 33s per r•
grinding; oats, 27s to 33s Od per 24 stone.

HULL—MARCH . 013
A small supply of English wheat 11
to-day, whic."tirell
slowly at barely last week's prices. Foreign was ell doll,
neglected, but holders did not press sales. Barley virlis,lato
but not quotably lower. Beans and peas in retie], a'
quotations. Oats very dull. 1.. Of
Wheat.... Old white.... per qr. s4s Od to ocl

Old red
New white
Now red .... ,
Dantzic, Konb , '&c. old white 8s
56s Od to
tt,o' 66(1 3 Oti gl
5
Dutch, Belgian, and French. 58s Od to °
Baltic and Hamburg, red sBs Od to 6,10 0,1
St. Petersburg and Riga, old sos Od to 5,12: OJ
Barley.... English malting 348 Od to '' 3 03
Grinding Oa
Saul and Oderbruck
Holstein and Danish
Grinding
004
a:
00°0
dddd
tttl
000°
5: 2 4 "3
a.ts,
.3,
0,.; ,69
065
Oats English, old
Archangel and Riga, per st oBl2ld to "13
Friesland and Dutch osl3d to 09
Swedish and Danish osl2o to Od
Oti,
Beans ....English, old, per qr 46s Od to IAS c*
New pigeon 42s Od to 10',. 01
New tick. 4os Od to fl"-0 004
Egyptian.
Peas Foreign breakers .
Grinding
Tares ....Spring.
Indian Corn
53 30s Od
Od 000 ddd
tt att
0: Stsc3,2B °o
al
52s Od to "„r Od
Linseed, feeding
crushing •.. 40s Od to al 0
Linseed cakes (Hull) £9 17 6 to £lO ,„
815 oto 9 Jou 0
Foreign
517 6to 6 in-
Rape cakes
5 5 oto 6L"
Bones

NEWCASTLE-UNDER LYNE—mAnca 10,
at,
At this market to-day there was a scarce show of,W.elleco,
in fair condition, and the demand was inactive. 111to0°.
White wheat, 60s to 68s; red, 56s to 64s per 36
„1"- dog
Barley firm, at the rates of the week previous, 10--30 et'
selling at 35s to 40s per qr., grinding 30s to 32s per 3gg t°
Oats, 24s to 29s.per 24 st. ; beans, 40s to 48s; 116'W'
46s per qr.

BIRTHS.

0
DESBOROUGII.—On the 111 h inst. at at The Chest —o ,11f
Walton-on-Thames, Mrs. Laurence Desborougb/
son. the
GIBB.—On the 11th inst., at 18, Westbournc-Par/'
wife of George Gibb, Esq., of a daughter. c Oar'
WARREN.—On the 10th inst., at Picton-terrace, - 6(l'/
then, the wife of William de Grouchy Warren'
Mayor of Carmarthen, of a son.
MARRIAGES.
EAST—PEARCE.—On the 11th inst., at St. /dark :obrest
gent's-park, Frederick East, Esq., to Emily, Y°730,09
daughter of the late J. Pearce, Esq., of Bisll°P
Wilts.
LAING—LAWSON.—On the 12th inst., at All
oSailo'iod
therhithe, Charles Laing, Esq., of Hackney 00,0'
Ann, widow of Edward Lawson, Esq., oof usta
Awf
Rotherhithe.

DEATHS.
DINWIDDIE —On the 10th inst , at 26, Quecn's,;r-3(1 cola-
gent's park, Gilbert Hamilto'n Dinwiddie,
rnissary-General, aged 68. Notting,-
GRAY.—On the 11th inst., at Addison-road I\r.,
rg hill, Walter-Gray, E , of ILM.'s Bombay'
Survey, aged 24. 4
KENNETT.—On the 6th inst., suddenly, at
the
House, Dorchester, Captain V. F. Kennett/
Bombay Army, aged 63. gelid
LEIGH.—On the 7th it.st., Stoneleigh Abbey, d one
Richard, infant child of Lord and Lady Leigh, Bge
year and ono month. of
MARSDEN.—On the 10th inst.,, Thomas Marsden, x's'6l(lo
Park- terrace, Greenwich, and Queen-street, Cheap
aged 57 late 0,

VOL)
LoNnorr : Printed and Published by AIURP,,n -N0.11%
of No. 112, Strand, Printer, at THE SUN °glee,' Cotes
'2%
Strand, in the Precinct of the Savoy, in the vv—
XiddlegONl—Thuriday, Nardi 13, 1562 ,