The Sun.
London, England, 1801-08-21 00:00:00

iSSEX Assik,t,

CHELMSFORD, 1ui.y.2,4; -
BEFORE SIR kASH GROSE, ANE.A SrECINL JURY.
'DU CANE, ESQ. V. HONEYWOOD, ESQ.

GAR,ROW said,' this was an Aetion between
two very respeCtabie Gentlemen; the one Peter Du
Esq: and the other Filiner Honey wood, .Esq.
to ascertain the `right to cut trees in a place, which
most probably some of the Jury, had seen ; he thought
he could, in a very few minutes, put his
.Lordship
and them in possession of the whole* the case; it
ar appeed to him a case so absolutely tVithotit defence,
th:tt the ingenuity of man could not devise one.
The Plaintiff was-proprietor of the Manor called
Great Coggeshall Manor, and the -.ChaCeway, or,
Lane in question, was beyond all doubt within that
Manor. Upon this place were growing some `trees
which had been felled by Order of Mr. Honeywood,
and the anion was brought to try whether. he had a
right to cut them down or not. He might very
well content himself by resting 'the claim .of the
Plaintiff upon his. title as Lord of 'the Manor ; he
might shew that it was part of the waste of that
Manor. He might insist on Mr. Du Cane's-right
to cut dOwn these trees 'as Lord of the Manor, butt.
he•would not entangle himself with manorial rights,
because he claimed the place in question. as the Free-
hold Estate of Mr. Du Cane, granted to.him by a
conveyance, cotemporary with .Mr. Honey wood's,
Having such a case as that, he shOuld-be one of the
greatest ideots in the world to abandon it to go-in-
to the question 'of manorial' rights. • He.had been
told, his Learned Friends had not- seen these deeds
he -was inclined to believe it, for had they seen
them, they certainly- would not. have advised. their
Client to defend this cause. But 'it was to be said,
that-Mr. Honey-Wood-had ctlt some-timber before in
this chace,: he it so ; it did no'r follow because a
Gentleman cut trees, which he had no,right to, and
his good natured neighbour did not -quarrel with
-him about it, that the right was therefore con-,
eluded. He stood 'there upon-liis Deed; not in-
deed in the vindiaisve spirit of Shylock,' but as the
representative of Mr.. Do Cane, 'to claim 'a right,
which, no doubt, Mr. "HoneYwood thought be.:
longed to him. He Would-she* km-originai grant,
, by aperson who was aaual owner of all this Estate,
by :which the grantor expressly said, The would give
all the land on the right hand' of the Lane' to such
an one, and all the land -on the left. to such an one,
with the exclusion of the chace.

Mr. Serjeant SHEPHERD said, he was perfe&ly
satisfied Mr. Honey wood had never seen, any of
thebe deeds.

John Stowers proved the cutting down
.the trees,
by order of Mr. Honeywood.
John Griggs, Esq. proved, that the Plaintiff was
Lord of die Manor of Great Cokgeshall ; and that
about ten years ago, he took away two trees, which
Colonel Bullock had cut on the land.

Mr. GARRow then put in a'deed, to be read by
the Associate, and said, it was found among, Mr.
Du Cane's title-deeds. He stated, that Henry
Warner, by a deed.poll; dated 26th of, January;.
1628; conveyed the Lane, with all its profits, to
Mr. Du Cane's ancestors ; and, that by an odd co-
incidence of circumstances, two of the-ancestors of
the Defendant were witnesses to awl:teed.

The deed was then read, by %irhich it appeared;
that on the 16th of January, in the year of.
Charles I. (1'628), Henry Warner, of Little Cog
geshall, granted the estate' to John Alliston, to hold.
to and his heirs and assigns for ever.
He next prodkiced a duplicateof the Contreyance,
under .which Mr. Honeywood held his estate..
This deed was -dated the 17th of January, i6zB,
and was made between John AllistOn, of 'llia&
'Notley, in Essex, of the one part, and Elizabeth
Honey wood, of Mark's. Hall, of the other part ; by
which John Alliston, surrendered, remised, and re'
leased, .to said Elizabeth, and her heirs, all his
estate, right, title, &c. to Little Monk 'WoOds
the profits of the said 'way excepted.'
This was the Plaintiff's Case. t •

Mr. Serjeant SHE.PITEXD addressed the jury.. He
said he presented himself before'them under those
disadvantages which naturally arose from his not
having had any great opportunity of discussing the
question. He would venture to' say, that, in no
period of time, when Mr. Du Cane or his assistant had
been attempting to'elaim the property in this Lane,
down to the present day, had they ever-shaped it as
they have now done : he, was sure of it ;. because, it
being a case between respeaable men, as Mr. Honey-
wood- and Mr. Du Cane both -were, they 'might •
easily suppose that a question of this sort could not
arise, without a 'gentlemanly communication be-
tween them : and lie was quite sure, that nobody
ever heard, till to-day; the cl;.im that Mr. Du Cane
had set up. He-said, he did not wonder at their
not claiming manorial rights—because tyre way they
had'put it to-day, totally destroyed all conception
of this Lane being part of the waste of the Manor :
they knew perfedly well that Great Monk Wood
and Little Monk Wood were. once the f)roperty of
the Crown, as well as the Manor of Coggeshall:
They were all granted at different times to different
people,' as several and distinet estates, and never as
part 'of the Manor of Coggeshall. He begged the
Jury to consider the question is it'now stood; 'and .
the answer he was prepared'to give to .it, notwith-
standing' the unexpeted shape in which they had
put it. The Learned Serjeant.then stated, that the
proprietors of Monk WoOd Lane, as appeared by the
deechhey had just read, were formetry tenants in
common. There were four person's' tenants in com-
mon, who afterwards made partition," and one Cy_
prian Warner became 'tile owner of that part of Monk
Wood belonging to Mr. Du Cane,,,Pyprian Warner
had granted to Alliston a part of Monk Wood, and
, that same Alliston Kid sold to the predecessors of
Mr. Honeywood's 6mily another part, no* belong-
ing to Mr. Filmer Honey wood ; but they had re_
served the profits of the Chaceway. Now, there-
' fore, say they, they have aver been, granted to
Mr. Honeywood. He that begged leave to make
this observation, that they had not sbewn, nor
could they shew, that when. Alliston sold to Mr.
Du Cane the part of the wood at the North end of
the Lane, he ever conveyed to -Mr. Du Cane the
profits of the Chaceway. Say they, we will shew

that Allistcin, tinder whom they testi:wed to
hiirselt the profits of the Chacewov; SUppose he
did, did he ever convey them to .M Du Cane ?
He has the litle:aleeds, anti_ if this-Chacewayi ivhich
was reseiVed by - AlliSton; was conveyed as the
freehold; estate of that Alliston; under Cyprian
Warner; lee them shew it. " Itot I defy them to
do it. And why ? Nat bec4use I liavc seen the
deed, but because; if they could, they Would have
proved it." This was a case evidence,.of
.the tolscrhioti was evidence of the right. When- they
Say, that in 1628, this land Was conveyed to Mr.,
Du-Cane, or rather the other part to Mr. Honey.
wood; :reserving the profits of. the Lane, it is most
evident that they cannot shew that, they were ever
conveyed to Mr. Du Cane ; if 'they could, they
would have produced the deed beyond all doubt.=
'lt said, that this Chaceway, and the timber upon
the Lane, ,is not in Mr. Honey Wood, but in Mr.
Cane ; because of the words, " the profits of the
Chaceitay.'', The term projct,-, the Learned Ser-
jeant said, lie took to be an equivalent term. If
land be conveyed,- and all the profits thereof, it will
pass the soil ; , it will pass every thing on that soil.
But the very deed they have read, manifests that the .
distioaion between profits of one sort and another
is to be coristrded by the usage that has taken place
in consequence of it. Mr. Du Cane has cut timber
opposite to his own estate ; we all agree .he has , a
right 'to it. Upon the ,same principle, Mr. Han-
bury, Colonel Bullock, 'and Mr. Honey wood, have
a right, aS-beloriging to their estates, ,on:both sides
the Lane. But Mt. Griggs has gone farther ; he
says, thiit two trues have been carried to Mr% Du
Cane's. That is the only instance-of Mr. Du Cane's-
touching those *trees, except those that- lie, paral-
lel to his own hedge. His Learned Friend had. said
that, prima facie, this Lane belonged to, the Manor.
'He did not know whether hit this County, or in this
'part of the County,, it was so understOocl ; but he-
should -conceive,' that unless the Lane were. proved
to have manorial rights,- that,i.the soil does not be.,
long to the Lord of the Manor, but to the owners of
the soil on the other side the hedge.. He knew that
in a County on the other side of the .Water khe
County of Kent); .the Lord of 'the Manor 'was not
entitled to ,the soil. ;But, .he said, we are relieved
from . the consideration. of Manorial. Rights, be-
cause they have shewn they have none, and to what
they have a right, he-.should make an observation
or two--Ding IJAmEsltgranted the woods, called
Great and Little Monk Woods,- and the profits
thereof, manifestly distinguishing between other
profits that might be; derived from the ground,
and from the soil. When partition is made, they
make partition of Great- and. Little Monk Woods,
reserving the profits of the •Chaceway. The pro-
fits do riot mean the timber, and, all ,arising out of
it, but mean- those proftts not included in the tim-,
bet-. There is a manifest distinCtion between pro-
' fits, as including all the profits, and something, as,
diStinguislied -between the herbage and pannage, and
so on. If Mr. DuCane- be entitled to those timbers,
he is likewise entitled to • all Colonel Bullock's,
Lord Harewciod's,-and.Mr. Hanbury's. He should
prove that Mr. Griggs; . when he marked the trees,
marked them as the friend of--Colonel Bullock, al-':
though he was the Steward of Mr. Du Cane. Mr.
Hanbury Itat-cut-do-WWI-Nes frbm time immemorial ;.
Lord Harewood's people have cut down yelss, and .
Mr.. 11 meywood cur down two 'trees in this Lane,
the stumps of Which some of the Gentlemen had
seen. [The Jury had taken a vieiv of ;the ,Lane,
upon the Defendant's application to-the Court for
that purpose.J He cut them, and took .them away.,
'lt was, a most extraordinary thing, that Mr. Du
Cgine, who, had looked over his, own title deeds,
:should, when all this happened to him from year to
year, now tell you, that that reservation of the
-profits of the Lane; should give him a right to hold
this Lane, and its profitS,, in mclusion of all the rest.
. What is it that is granted as to this Chaceway call-
ed 'Monk Wood Jane ? to/am m 1-.Jenellam jacen-.
tem inter,' Great Monk Wood and Little Monk
Wood. Though Great Monk Wood is' opposite,
Little Monk Wood is not, but stands on the
boundary of a separate' freehold estate, which Mr.
Honeywood deriited from a different family,. called .
Crowlands; and, therefOre, when, this. Chaceway
was granted, it was Taken: for 'granted, jacentem
•inter; Greta Monk. Wood, and titile Monk Wood ;
and, therefore, he should .put 'the case in this way,
admitting, for a memenr, that the supt in question
was jacentem inter, Great
,Monk Wood and.-Little
Monk Woud, lying between the two ; even admit-.
ring that to be true, yet still the case, wherethey
cannorshew that this grant has ever been 'extended,
to themselves ; where they cannot find a singlestick.
has been taken by them, except those- two trees,
which, were conveyed to Mr. Du. Cane's ; When they,
cannot shew that they have ever exercised any right
in this Lane, except their own corner, it does ex-,
plain the exception in the grant to be, not the
. timber, but those profits he. had before spoken of.
Is if there had been a grant to Mr- Du cane, still,
he contended, that this part of Great IVlonk Wood,
Lane wOuld ,not be the property of Mr. Du... Cane,
but of the owmer of the adjoining freehold,: which
is Mr. Honeywood, he having purchased the estate
called
,Crowlands. - He then requested the Jury to
recolleft, that they could not now turn him round,
anday, it belonged to Mr: Du Cane, as Lord of the
Manor, They could not recover in this ation, uni•
less they convinced `them that, the freehol&of *the
spot where * the trees were cut was in them, by
shewing some specific' grant, or some enjoynient
amounting to an exclusive possession of this Lane.
They had shown it was not part of the manor by
their own evidence. Then he would ask them,.
whose property was it The owner of the ,freehold,
-beyond all question. With respeet to .usage, he
should prove to them,- by' ieveral witnesses, that all,
the. trees had heen cut down by the owners of the
adjoining land, Colonel Bullock, Lord Hare Wood,
and Mr. Hanbury,. He concluded by Observing,
that thcughthis case had wine upon' him by surprise,
he, was persuaded the Jury, by attending to these
circumstances, would givethem considerable weight.

The Dcfendant'A Counsel then examined a number
of witnesses, vho clearly proved the faits adverted
to by tht Learned Serjeant. .
It appared in ,the course, of the trial, that Mt)
iloneyweod, the iYefe.ndant, had, previous, to the
Assizes, tecvii-ed notice from the Plaiutiff 'S Solicitor

!o kmluce ilk duplicates of tEe old dc. read it
Court, which were in his possession:

Mr. GAR ROW then addressed the Ptragaink by
way of reply,, at considcrable length; He- con.
eluded by apologizing to them, for tithing, up,sd
nuich.of their time, and telling thetn, that the only
question ,was, ,6 whether the place in question -:was
the soil of Mr..Du Cane It was so in i 623
and no man could shew-he;had-erv-er parted with it,'
The Learned judtelhen told the jury, that the ,
question they had to try, was, 'whether the' soil of
Monk Wood Lane, and the trees growing upon it,
were the Property of the Plaintiff? If they were
his property, then, undoubtedly, he 'had a right 'to
.the present anion. • As to damages, he did not sup,
pose:that the Gentlemen (Counsel for the Plaintiff)
would think much about them, if they found a ver,
diet for the Plaintiff.' As it was a question of right
between the parties, nominal damages would be
sufficient, and .the cause might end with the same
good humour with, which it had been carried cr.—
He then recapitulated the whole of the evidence,
and said, it was for them
.to say, whether they had
any ground upon which they would feel•themselves
warranted in saying, that this ,venella ever got into ,
the possession•of the Defendant.
The Jury, in a few minutes, gave a verdietfor
the Plaintiff—Damages, 4os.

[HANSON, ESQ. v. Gu.tsoN, in our next.]

At Shrewsbury Fair, on Tuesday and Wedneilay
se'nnight, sheep and pigs sold high, as did also
horned cattle and good horses, of which there were
not many. Lambs' wool ra.d. per lb. ; fleece wool
(being mostly jobbers) from z6s. to ars. ; better
sort averaged from 265. to zBs. per stone.---Cheese
from 745. to 86S. per hundred.
- Wednesday morning, . about four o'clock, a mid-
dle-aged decent dressed man was discovered in a
ditch, leading from Camberwell to Kennington, ,to
appearance almost dead; two labouring men going
to work, with some difficulty got him °tit' of the
ditch, quite helPless, and with other assistance they
took him to the 'nearest- public house, where in
about an hour he recorered,' and stated, that hav-
ing on Tuesday
,been at Camberwell Fair, with
several acquaintance, and after spending the even.
ing with them, they separated ; that he met with s-
female, whopretended to know him, and would ac_
company him home, and going /across the fields
they were overtaken by a man, ivho demanded his
Money ; on refuskig to deliver it, he was -knocked
down; • when the woman assisted in rifling his
pockets of his sillier watch, and about two guineas,
after which they threw him into a ditch, where .it
is supposed he had been nearly three hours.
Yesterday ten carmen were summoned before the
Lord-Mayor, for refusing .to • load their carts with
goods from the wharf of Mr. Edward Ogle. It
seems this practice Is become very common, to the
great detriment of trade, as these carmen will only
load for particular persons, and thereby prevent the
• facility of business. His Lordshifi fined them each
s.s., ;and said, if- they were brought up again, he
should be under the necessity of enlarging the fine.
. Wednesday a man, almoit naked (sop,osed to be
derange in his mind, and escaped from confine.
ment); paraded through the City, breaking several
windows, and cowinued.• his way up 'Holborn, into
Hand-court, When he entered the Feathers Tavern,
got into the bar, and did considerable damage, by
breaking windows, bowls, and glasses, and cut him-
self in a terrible-manner; he was at last propetly
secured, anti conveyed to the watch-house.
Yesterday John Foster was .charged at GuF.dhall, -
with introducing himself to a lad carrying a basket
zof linen, value 361. in Fleet-street, giving him mo-
ney .to t*.tch some cakes, and desiring-him to leave
the baSket in his care till his return,- which the boy
readily agreed to. • As soon as the boy was goi.e
he was for making-away from-the place, but a Gen.
tleman observing the transaCtion; and conceiving
him to -be a sharper, stopped him till the bey'a re;
turn, who declared he hai.never keen him, before,
on which he was put into the care of a Constable.
He is .suspeeted to bethesaine person who defratid_
ed a lad , a -few nights since in Holborn 'of a box,
containing wearing apparel. Upon both charges he
iris fully committed for trial.
A few- nights since, the hope of Mr. Jaques,
Ornamental ManufaEtuier, in. HolbOrn, . was brcike
open ;. the villains packed bp almost every article of
value that they couldtrvesonveniently carried off;
but, were happily prevented by a servant, girl. in the
house ; - a considerable. coMmand over tier
-alarm; she awoke, and. disCoVered- a man in her
room; -lighting_ her• candle with sotne'phosphorns ;
she saw him take her gown.: with him; she sup.-
' -pressed her alarmenough to prevent his knowing
she was awake, and when he was gone out of the
room, she got- up and fastened her door, and then
contrived, to awake her fellow Servant, .Who slept in.
• An •adjoiriing room, , who gave the alarm to her
master .and inistress. Mr. Jaques looked out of
the window, and-called the Watchman ;', the villains
r,hearing the alarm, made their escape over 'a wall of
the yard; into an adjoining _court, and carried -with.
'then,' several articles of plate of colisiderable value..
It is supposed, they entered the house by the.one.
pair of stairs window, and we hope, this circtra_
stance will operate as a caution to the Public to
have_their windoWs well secured. .

. . • ,
On Tuesday 'night, or early on Wednesday morn-
ing,.the house of L. Prime, of aillingdon,
was broke open and, robbed of plate, wearing ap-
parel, and other property, to a considerable amounr,
with which the robbers made thei? escape. he
robbery is supposed to have been committed by
three men, who were seen in a chaise cart, about
three o'clock on Wednesday-morning, coming from
.Mr..Primat's house, towards London.

On Tuesday evening, the house of Mr. Odiin,
in Church street, Paradise-row, Rotherhithe, was
entered and robbed of a very large trunk, contain-,
ing property of very considerable amount.; like-
wise, the whole of the, cash and noces.of which the
Gentleman was possessed ; and there h no doubt,
entertained of its being stolen by some person or
persons, who knew the in tnense property the trunk
contained.

The Meicariits, Broma, from .Aiiiateralim to
'Stockholm with goods, is captured by the Lynx
and Squirrei SLoop4, anti sent into Yarmouth.

often myself seen. At,lengih, in 1773 orders were
given to root.up every vinethat bore white grapes,
and replace them with red; because the former give
more, but worse wine': This measure, was altoge-
ther prejudicial; for , the difference between tte
priceSof good ana,bad wine. being
.very
little attention was paid to the choice of the cult-
ings„those which' gave a
,gteater quantity being
preferred to the.better :varieties.- The
.Wine-grow.
ers also suffered. by it considerably, .a new planted
stock hot 'bearing its proportion of ft:nit till five'
Years' old. The Company itself, says the above.
Mentioned Author; must falsify the wine, since they
export as'itif,4 FaaOry-wine as they receive, though
it lose 'a :ninth part of its titiantity, in' the ware-
houses Willett It is kept.
The CSitipany have the Monopoly of all the 'Fac-
tory-wine exported to foreign parts, but. send it al,
most entirely to England: In I'7Bo the wise plan
was first put in
.force, of freighting ships loaded.
with Port,wine direetly to,Petersburgh. This has"
been repeated from. time to time, but the number is
stilt insignificant. • Portugal might certainly find a
considerable•market for her wines in all the .North-
ern States, and men would soon drink larger-quan-
tities of this excellent wine, which so far excels The
common sour French wine, were it not spoiled 'by
that quantity. of brandy, which none.but the Eng,
lish can.like. Perhaps, however, it was this bran:.
died Portugueze wine. that first corrupted the taste
of the English, who were alniost ,entirely confined
to.this kind. of wine. :Six per cent. for commission
and:shipping, 'and-sixteen per cent. ,profit are al-
lowed" this CoMpany.
The Company had .at first the monopoly of all
.Wine, vinegar, .and brandy, sent ..to. the Colonies ;
but so early 'as .1776, the ports of Bahia, Pernarn-
' buco, Paraiba, and-all the-. Asiatic and African Co-
lonies had been open for the vinegar and brandy of
Estremadura. Under the reign of the present
Queen the free exportation of Portugueze wine t&
' Brasil was permitted,. and the Company only ob.
tattled the-monopoly of the wines of Upper Douro
-to Brasil aid the, .the Colonies, to-which a•great •
quantity' of vinho deraino is.sent.
1n,1760 they obtained the monopoly of brandy
for the. Provinces of Belra,-Wlinho, \Traz.:os-mon.
tcs, and the—Colonies ; OR which. account their
funds rteeiiiedoari addition 'Of 66,000 crusades.—
Fr-9in the year- .4773 the. Apothecaries were also
prohibited from disaing. The trade in wine for
that parposais entirely free of duty. -Many•of the
ports: of Brasil, and
_the rest of the Colonies, as 1
.have already said, were excepted so early as 1776
from this 'prohibition, and still receive brandy
frOin Estrermidura.

'TheCompany have further possessed,: from their
first eredion, the monopoly of wine -.in the- towra
of Oporto 'itself, and the country three leagiteS
round-it,, which distance' was extended in 17'63 to
-
four leagues; in order, as was giyeltout, to preVert
all falsification of wine. This at first excited a
tumult, which was suppressed 'by. force, and the
ring-leaders of which were severely punished,—
The Company still possess this privilege, and every
trwern bears the words Ca7illanbia. do altotDouro,
Here also much vinho" de ramo is 'consumed by the
common people.. -
Atletigth, in 1771, the Company acquired the
privilege of cxclusively furnishing with wine the
taverns
,in the/ distrids of Pero
Regua, Pena-
guiao, ezao-frio, listrqueirog, Teixeira, Tournes,
and Sabrosb de Folhadella, likewise under a pretext of
preventing falsification; whereas it is .'evident that
the xeal objeei,was to increase the prkileges of the
Company ; Barqueiros kcpa Mezao-frio -being , dis-
trias appropriated to vinho.de- ramo, and Sabroro
producing, no other wine whatever. Neither did
Teixeira belong to Upper Douro.
Such is the .history -of an institution, in which
the spirit -of the: Founder, Pombal, very clearly
prevails. His eXcrtions to- benefit 'the country are
every where 'apparent ; but' every where the mea-
sures he adopted were precipitate and despotic.—
Absolute Governments' generally. run from one ex.
treme to the other. Some -expedient was necessary
to' improve-the -wine-trade of Portugal, or•at least
paEtly to wregv:ii from the hands 'of Foreigners,
which the erttlion of the Company of Upper
Douro -hasrtmclotibtedly donei but was it therefore
necessary ter-exceed the proper bounds of
'with so despwiie:i hand ? inistry 'of 'the pre-
sent Qbe. eh in many respects .alletidted- the yoke 'of
the preceding reign, through a desire to oppose the
measures of- Pombal ; but they fell into as state -of-
total- inactivity, and onlydiretied their attention to
restoring to the: Priesthood, with usury; what'Pom_
bal had taken from them. •

The Rev. T. GRF EN, of Middleton Cheney,
Northamptonshire, in a Lct:er of August r; 0301,
favoured B. D. PplKlNs,.of LekeFter-squarc, Lon-
don, the Patentee of t 4 Metallic Tractors, with
a long List of Cores by them. He coneltidesf---,
" From my conviaion of the real utility of the
Traaors; I sincerely wish they were univeFgnfly
known and used ; and doubt not but this will soon
be the case." Among several Cases Rheuma-
tism, Gout, Sprains, &c. is the following : •

• " CA 3 E-L-S
-P R. A I s and Rn EtIM AT I young, Woman
• had a-very:paintul tumetadion on the back of her ,hand, for
which a poultice was tried' for several days without any ad-
vantage.. A gathering was expelled to take place by her,
medical attendant. Continually growing .worse, the,applied
to another medical. man, who thought it a Sprain attended
with B. firtunatism. -When she came to me,she.-could ntit
move any•of her fingers, and her arm, which was swelled to
.her elbow, she• was totally incapable of -uSing.• In three
iiperathilis of the Traaors for twenty minutes, she was much
relieved. By continuing their use four .days she. was able to
lace her stays, was -soon completely cured, and has since
worked at hay-making. I n this case, as in others, I repeatedly
observed•the-swelling tbllow the points of the Tractors."
On•tlic.rst of -April was published, by the Patentee,_ an en-
tire new. W o rk, entitled "'CMS Ot.Suc.:essful Piz-dice with
Perkins's Patent Metallic Tractors, received since January
Igoe, the date of •the- former Publication,"• Sic. price as.—
Sold by J. Johmon, • St. Paul's Church-yard, London.. Of
the Patentee ixArtay be had gratis, by all wino have purchas-•
cal the Traetdtil.; • • . •

Tho Cvfes Of Gout, Rheumi,eism, Head-ad), Tooth-ach,
Sprains, Bruises, and all analogous Diseases of Horses, which
are published, are innumerable.
'>: rte Tractors' so necessary in every 'Family, and among
Horses, nifty. bohad genuine, with new and improved Direc-
tions- for- 'u&ing•Ahc...‘, for Five Guineas the Set,, of B D.
Perkins, A. M.' 'she Patentee, in- Leicester-square ; and of
Frederick Smith, Chemist and Druggist, in the Hay-market,
London. The portable nature of the Tradors renders their
conveyance by coach,•or even by.pOst, perfedly convenient.
Letter's inclosing Their amount (post-paid) duly attended to.

. i-'"

:,
~

. ;

N N : Printed by BUCHANAN WM! 1.1. AN, (ot Bo vv-Str::".% orctr-C arnCII.; 411,ITUM ~,t, t % ‘‘, ti t.IAM ARMtr.ex Sca rrs (ot Horse-terry-road, Westminster)
e+itt N.QFFI'C E. No. z, iSrrand i where .ddverr;remgfor, Orders to; 9e raper, Lettfri tor'she Editor, 4c,, ripest-paid), m9t be addresse
0,44 K • t.