The Sun.
London, England, 1862-11-06 00:00:00

LAW-THIS D.A.Y.

POLI

a39a Ewa;

Paid.

Price.
61 64

~.,

don,

MARLBOROUGH-STREET.

,11:!utic St Lawrenc,
)
Bom.,Barodadt.Cent .Ic,
Gu. 5 per cent..
Do. New
:Olk Buffalo and Lase Ituroi
L 0 Do. Preference •

LORD MAYOR'S COURT.
(Before the Recorder and a Common Jury.)
A FRENCH " CABBY" AND MR. TRAINS TRAMWAY.-

CLARK V. JOHNSON•
This was an action to recover £22 :Os. damage to a horse
belonging to plaintiff, who is a cab-owner, by the alleged
negligence of defendant's servant.
Mr. Butler Rigby appeared for the plaintiff, and Mr.
Charles Smith for defendant, who pleaded not guilty and
payment.
Mr. Rigby having opened his case called Edward Garette,
a cab driver, who, in describing the accident, said that de-
fendant's cart was in Mr. Train's tramway, and the wheel
skidded before it could get out, It was very difficult to get
out of Mr. Train's tramway, when once in it. (Roars of
laughter.) It was more difficult for a cab than for a cart,
for a cab had four wheels and a cart only two. Witness
had been in Mr. Train's tramway and had found it ex-
tremely difficult to get out. Witness was a Frenchman,
and the sides were different in France.
Mr. Rigby then called evidence to show that plaintiff's
horse was injured very severely by the shaft of defendant's
cart, and that it could net work for a long time, even now
being much deteriorated in value.
Plaintiff said he saw defendant's driver, and pointed out
the damage to the cab, and he said he was to blame for
letting a boy drive, and subsequently plaintiff received 165.,
and signed a receipt (now produced) pointing out that the
damage to the horse had still to be considered. The police
authorities would not allow the horse to be worked.
His Lordship—The cheapest way would have been to
have shot the horse the next day.
Plaintiff—Yes, it would; and I have lost a great deal
more. There was the Exhibition, and, in short, I lost a
great deal by the affair.
Mr. Rigby —We have had notice to produce the horse,
which is outside. (Laughter.)
Mr. Smith said that he should prove the accident to have
occurred through Mr. Train's interference with our streets
by putting down a tramway which was a perfect nuisance
to vehicles running in the public highway.
Defendant's driver said that two "gentlemen" came up
after the collision, and one of them gave his card, the other
writing his name on the back. That card was destroyed,
as Mr. Clark told witness their names would condemn
him in any court. The " gentlemen" had been
advertised for, but had not since been found. (Laughter.)
The boy was driving contrary to the rule.
Cross-examined—I was on the tramway. I never got off
the tramway. The wheel skidded. There is an iron cap
on the point of the shaft.
His Lordship—That is calculated to inflict a considerable
injury wherever you go.
Witnese—The woodwork of the shaft was broken and the
iron bent.

00 littf 1-do. tirant.4.(:(o.trittt
p. et. Art,-4., 1. 1,7*
,06 Do. (1,4. July 1.
Juuc 1, I,',
:I(;utta.& S. East!), I.

!aperown AL Dock Seri,
k Eastn. Bengal go. 5 p.
riast Indian, g-n. sp. e
Do. do. G Ext...
Do. do. H do ..
;It Grand Trunk of Canati
/ Do. 6 per cent. Fret..
1 Do. 2d Pref. 6 per ct
1 Do. 6 per ct. Debent
) Do. 7 per cent. 1862 ..
) Do. do. 1867..
) Do. do. 1872..
tk Gt. IndiaPenin.gua.sp.c
) Do. New gua. 5 p. c...
) Do. January, 1862 ..
tit Gt. South.of India(Lim
guaranteed 5 per cent.
Gt. W. of Cane da Share.
Do. New
Do. 6 p.c. '73 with't opt.
Do. 5} p. c. do. '77 d 0...
Do. 1878 •
0 Indian Branch Limitce
,ck Madras guar.„ 5 p. c. . •
,:b.k Do. 4/ p. c. Extensio,
1k De. 44 do.. •.- • •
Melb.CorD. A p. c. Buds
Melb. & Hobson's Bay.
Do. 7 p. c. &lortg. •Bd4.
New Br unswick et Can.
Class A. Capital Shari.
Do. do. B Capital d 0...
pc Ist pi bdS
cc &Jude
t Do* Delhi
Do. do al
:0 Do. Punjaub
it Do. Do.
'a Do. Indus. St. Flo.)

I 4 )Ithil,:\

AlltWert, dr. itOtterlitftl.

5 Be;gian East. Junction
Copiapo ..............
O Ditto Extension ....
:0 Dutch Rhenish
20 Do ....

Eastern of France ....

:0 Grand Rus Guar. Rp. c.
:0 Gt. Luxem., Con. she...

10 Italian Junction
:0 Namur & Liege ....
10 Do. 6p. o. fret.
16 Northern of France
16 Do. New Shares
10 N.Rail of BuenosAgres
Gua. 7 p 0., Lim
10 Do. do
10 Norwegian Trunk i'rt•l
Ot'mn ( Smyrna to Aidn)
l'arts,Lyons, & Medi ter.
10 Varis & Orleans
iceeite & S. Fran. (Peru )

zua. 7 p. ct. 1ien......
Itig-a & Dunaburg .... • •
IZoyal Danish. ........
5 Royal Swedish .......
I Do. 7 per cent. Pret
20

Sambre & Meuse ......
.0 Do. 5iP per cent. Pref.....
,an aulo, lira, g. 7p. c.
S.Aust. &Lomb Venetia
:0 s. Fast Portugal 7 p at.
southern of. France....
!,u Turin and Savona ....
West Frandern
;0 Do. 54 pc. Pre:crews, .
!e IV. &N.W. of France ..

The boy who was driving was called, and admitted being
on the tramway.

Mr. Coleman, a veterinary surgcon, said he had seen the
horse outside, and it appeared to have been injured in the
hip.

Cross-examined—l merely felt the last rib, and can say
that the ribs have not been broken, The horse is quite unfit
for work.

Mr. Rigby having; replied upon defendant's case, his lord-
ship summed up, and said the evidence given for the plaintiff
was clear, while tho answer on the part of defendant was
most unsatisfactory, and the jury could hardly have any
diubt as to the ause of the injury, and that defendant's
servants were in the wrong.
The jury found for the plaintiff £2O damages.

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS.
(Before Mr. Justice Willes and a Common Jury.)
BATCHELOR AND WIPE V. PIPER.

This was an action brough, by the plaintiff ana his wife
against the defendant, Jane Piper, for a savage assault
committed on the wife.

The jury returned a verdict fur the plaintiff—damages,
£5.

COURT OF DIVOME.
(Before the Judge Ordinary.)
GLENNIE V. GLENNIE AND BOWLEG.
This was a petition for dissolution of marriage presented
by the husband against the wife on the ground of adultery.
Condonation and connivance was pleaded by the respon-
dent and co-re&pondent. The petitioner was a clerk in the
Bank of England, and the co-respondent held a similar

situation in Somerset-house.
Mr. Karslake appeared for the petitioner, Mr, Huddle-
stone for the respondent, and the Queen's Advocate for the

co-respondent.
James Sherrell proved the marriage, which took place on
the 6th October, 1861, at St. Luke's Church, Chelsea.
John Taylor, one of the witnesses to the marriage, in
answer to Mr. Huddlestone, said he never saw the bride-

groom before the ceremony, and as to the bride he had only
seen her two or three times. She was a friend of a friend
of his wife's, and, therefore, he did not know much about
her. He went to the marriage to oblige, and he was sorry
he had done so. _ .

Mr. George Glennie, brother of the petitioner, living in

Green street, Grosvenor•square, said—My brother was a
clerk in the Bank of England, at a salary of £2OO a year.
I never knew anything of the marriage until the day after
it took place. I called at their house in the evening, which
was in Victoria-grove, Kensington, and after that I visited
about twice a week. My father, mother, and sister made
the acquaintance of my brother's wife. About a month after
this they left Victoria-grove, and, eventually, they went to
reside in Upper Berkeley-street. I visited there every
Sunday, but never met Mr. Bowles there. In January,
1862, sme circumstances came to my knowledge
which led me to make certain inquiries at Palace
Chambers, St. James's-street, and afterwards com-
municated with my Inv, her. I told him what I had heard
froni the porter at the chambers. Mrs. Glennie was at this
time living with her husband at Penge. After this his wife
went to Staffordshire, and my brother left her. I pointed
Mrs. Glennie out to the porter and page at the chambers.
By Mr. Huildleston—l did not know from my brother
that he had seduced his wife in 1853. 1 knew from him
that he met her in the streets, and also that she had a child.
My brother told me that he used to visit her previous
to the reartiage at Walton-villas. My brother never
told me his wile
of her gentlemen, I know a bill was sent to my brother at
previous to marriage had been kept by
the bank for brougham hire, but the name of Rather ford
or Webb was never mentioned. There was no mention of
the name of any
understood from my brother that his wife in the first in -
gentleman gentleman with whom she had lived. I
stance had been brought from Scotland by a gentleman,
who forsook her. He never told me she had been intimate
with Mr. Bowles. He never told me Bowles gave his wife
a watch and chain the day before the marriage. When
went to Palace Chambers in the beginning of 1862, the first
communication I received from the parties was written me.
It was of such a nature that it was thought proper that the
whole of the family should be present when it was commu-
nicated to him. I received the paper on or about the 30th
of January, 1862, but I did not tell him about it till the
sth of February although I saw himkevery day at the bank,
in which I hold a similar situation. He, however, told me
about the same time that his wife had complained that in-
quiries had been made about her.
By Dr. Phillimore—My brother mentioned the name of
Mr. Bowles the first time I saw him after marriage. I
asked him whose portrait it was I had seen on the mantel-
piece, and he said it was Mr. Bowles's, who was an acquain-
tance of his wife. It was in the morning of that day that I
learnt from my brother his wife's history. I employed a
man who had been in the police force, named Murrill, to
watch the house in Berkeley- street on the 7th of January.
Although I saw my brother every morning I never told
him I had employed a man to watch his house until the
sth of February. My brother never told me Mr. Bowles
was a frequent visitor at his home. I first became aware
_ that Mrs. Glennie bad been driving about in broughams
with Mr. Bowles from the fact of the bill of which I have
spoken coming into my hands. I then told my brother
about it, remarking that I did not think such a proceeding
proper, and he told me he would speak to his wife about it.
Mrs. Mary Frisby, of 52, Upper Berkeley-street, the
house at which Mr. and Mrs. Glennie came to live after
they left Walton-villas—said Mrs. Glennie on two occa-
sions went out in the evening and did not return until the
next day. Mr. Bowles used to visit occasionally and stop
to dinner, but Mr. Glennie was not at home when he did so.
Eliza Galloway, a domestic servant, said Mrs. Glennie
once told her that she had spent a jolly sight with Mr.
Bowles, whom she sometimes called Mr. Gibson. She also
said Mrs. Glennie went out about the middle of January
in the present year one evening, and did not return until
the next morning. She came home about ten o'clock.
Mrs. Glennie frequently talked to her about Mr. Bowles,
and said she was very fond of him, and that he had been
kinder to her than her husband. She said she should like
to leave Mr. Glennie, as he did not give her any money.
saidS h e (witness) advised her not to do so, and Mrs. Glennie
she would leave it to Mr. Bowles.
I The case was proceeding %\ hen we went to press.

A WORD ABOUT DREAMS.—Dreams are the
accompaniment of both idleness and work. They "come
through the multitude of business," and occupy the lazy
brain; they are associated with the sluggard and the en-
thusiasi ; they are honoured as channels of supernatural
advice, and blamed as the offspring of sheer sensuality. We
dream with our eyes open as well as shut—by day as well
as by night. But the phenomena of dreams have- defied
scientific experiments and metaphysical inquiries. Now
and then it seems as if some law were discovered, but the
investigator is soon bulked. You fancy you can account for
a dream, but you can't make one. It may sometimes be
analysed, but I believe has never been composed. You do
not know how it will turn out. Impress your mind
strongly with this and that set of ideas, and 10, the whole
slips out of the place where you put it, and another occu-
pies your sleeping thoughts. You can't cook a dream.
The skilful speaker can count, with tolerable certainty,
upon producing an impression something like that which
he wishes upon the waking mind ; but, when we sleep, we
move out of the reach of his persuasive machinery.—Once
a Week.

THE SUN) LONDON, TFIIIRS9AY EVENING, NOVEMBER 6, 1862.

DAY.

CHARGE OP BREAKING INTO A WINE CELLAR.—
Michael Barry, a bricklayer, was charged before Mr. Knox
with breaking and entering a wine cellar at the Marquis of
Granby, 28; South Audley-street, and drinking and wasting
a quantity of brandy and beer, of the value of about £3, the
property of Mr. John Henry Lefevre, the landlord, and also
with assaulting Henry Smith, 147 C.
Mr. Lefevre said the prisoner was employed at his house
with another man to repair a drain near his wine cellar.
About sir in the evening he (Mr. Lefevre) went down to
see what the men were about, when he saw the prisone
near the cellar door in a state of mad intoxication, and on
examining the place he found that the cellar door had been
opened by the staple being drawn from the post. On ex-
amining the cellar he found that two quart bottles of ale had
been opened, and the tap of a brandy cask had not been
turned off, and the floor of the cellar was saturated with
brandy, a large quantity having run over the place. Some
wine casks had also been interfered with. On getting the
prisoner to the bar, he became very abusive and attempted
to strike him. He then sent for a constable and gave the
prisoner in charge.

Prisoner said that he had had some drink, but that it
was given to him by Mr. Lefevre.
Mr. Lefevre said that was in the morning.
Smith, 147 C, said that on taking the prisoner into cus-
tody he became very violent, and struck him two or three
times, and but for the interference of two soldiers, who
knocked down the prisoner, he would have received serious
injury. _ _ _

In answer to Mr Knox, Mr. Lefevre said the other man
appeared to have been drinking.
Mr. Knox—the prisoner having denied entering the cel-
lar—said he could not understand why the other man was
not present, either as a witness or in the dock, and remanded
the prisoner for a week that further inquiries might be
made, consenting, however, to take two bail in £l5 for the
prisoner's re-appearance.