The Sun.
London, England, 1862-08-21 00:00:00

POLICE INTELLIGENCE. Aug. 20.

MANSION-HOUSE. A respectably dressed
lad, 17 years of age, named Alfred Garnham, a
clerk, and Henry Read, 26, an ostler, were charged
with having in their possession the handle of a
silver table spoon, which was supposed to have
been stolen. _ _ _

_
Mr. Fry, silversmith, 108, Bishopsgate, said that
at about half-past eight that morning the prisoner
Garnham came into his shop and offered part of a
silver spoon for sale. He perceived that it had
been recently broken, and asked him where he got
it. He said his mother had given it him to dispose
of for the purpose of purchasing a box of paints.
He was given into custody, and the other prisoner,
Read, who was waiting outside the shop, was like-
wise taken into custody.
Mr. Champ, a solicitor, from Ipswich, said the
prisoner Garnham had been in his service as clerk,
and he had an officer from Ipswich, with a warrant
for his apprehension upon a charge of embezzle-
ment. _ . _

George Bullenthorpe, a detective officer from
Ipswich, produced a warrant signed by William
Mumford, Esq., magistrate, for the apprehension of
Alfred Garnham for embezzling the sum of £4, be-
ing part of the sum of £lO which he had received
on account of his employer, Mr. Champ. He stated
that the prisoner Garnham was the lad mentioned
in the warrant. He knew the other prisoner, but
he had no charge against him.
Mr. Goodman, chief clerk, asked Mr. Champ if
he knew anything of Read.
He said he did, and upon being sworn stated that
he knew the two prisoners were companions at
Ipswich. The prisoner Garnham was a clerk in
his service, and he believed if Read was remanded
he could prove that he knew the other prisoner had
robbed him and that he had also received a portion
of the money. They both left Ipswich together,
and been living together since. He knew to whom
the silver spoon belonged, and he believed it would
form a case against Read.
Garnham was then handed over to the custody of
Bullenthorpe to be taken before the magistrate at
Ipswich, and Read was remanded.

WORSHIP-STREET.—Catherine Geoffrey, a
comely and respectable looking female, about 35
years of age, was granted a protection order under
the following circumstances, as deposed to her upon
oath, and she said—l am the wife of Henry Geof-
frey, a bricklayer by trade, and was married to him
on the Bth January, 1856, at Old Bethnal-green
Church. I resided with him in London-terrace, and
Warner-place, Hackney-road, and during that time
learnt that his right name was Johnson, the other
an assumed one; that he had been transported for
life about the year 1829 in consequence of a robbery
committed by him on the Easter Sunday of the same
year; that after a considerable period he obt7inea
ticket of leave for any country except England—
despite a
ltil
despite of which restriction he did co
ere,
and married me as I have stated. I
1
for two years and a half. On the rveedovel.
with him
3d July, 1858, he
deserted me, but at the same time He Promised
me a mainte-
nanceleromised to
for 12 months, via., 150•
send for me at the end of that period, but has not
done so. Three mouths after he left me I received
autleTtatesmr furnoima, him,
nsot: teinncgi
utsll
na tec h
ae hady m
oante
arrived
ey .
nor re a n
remitnce
channel in his name. I have been in-
not heard of him since,
through any
formed that he took a woman with him from Eng-
land when he left me. I have set up in business since
fundsa
d forby Which
purpose were supplied
IninbdYeBaeirlinttihnneClofectioneniryy lawful industry have ac-
quiredtrade chattels and stock to