The Sun.
London, England, 1865-03-20 00:00:00

SEEDS.

Canary seed was dull, and late rates were barely sup
ported. Other agricultural seeds were, in limited request,
on former terms. There was a fair sale for East India lin-
seed and rapeseed at previous currencies. The demand for
cakes was quiet. Foreign linseed cakes ruled the turn in
favour of buyers, but cottonseed cakes were very firm in
price.

lurnip,White,p.bus.2Cs to 223
Swede —s —EI
Mustard, Brown —a s
White,
Tares, Spring — s
New winter, bush 9s 103
Cz•nary, per quaiter 41s 50s
Rye grass •... 24s 28s
Clover, Red Eng., et. 02s 'Ms
White
Foreign Red sls 70s
White Hs 80s
Trefoil '353 48s

Carraway 33s 338
Coriander 2s 24x
llempseed, per qr 4os 43s
Linseed,Eng.sowing 7Js 7.8
Crushing
Baltic —s —s

Odessa
Linseed Cake, p ton
English £lo Os

-0 —8
-s —s
£ll Cs

FoFeign £9 les £lloa
Rape Cakes,p ton £5 Os £5 108
Rapeseed, new,pr qr 74s 78s

TALLOW.

The tallow trade is firm to-day, and prices have
improved; P.Y.C. being quoted at 40s 9d per cwt on the
spot. Town tallow commands 41s 6d net cash.. Rough
fat, 2s lid per 81b.

Particulars.

1851.

Stock this nay....
Price of Y.C.
Delivery last week
Ditto from June 1
Arrivals last week
Ditto from June 1
Vrioe of Town ....

188.

18C3. I 1864.
45.268 ( 55.579
43891 t0,'4280-4,150
s Od . Od
1.0.12 1,313
63,037 64,315
677 1,015
75,010 8t.017
458 9d I 13s 9d

72.028 42.144
59802 :0 40s 01 10
596 3d —s od
1,008 1,270
87,949 103,302
1,204
112,91 i 88,685
58s ud 43s 61

41.839
49,19 d to
—sod
1,514
78,9 3

75,731
43s 9d

LAW INTELLIGENCE—(This Day )

COURT OF BANKRUPTCY.
(Before Mr. Registrar Murray.)
IN RE THE REV. G. N. FOY.

This bankrupt was described as of Gualior-house, Bel•
size-park, Hampstead, and to-day he came up for choice o.
assignees and proof of debts.

Mr. Treherne appeared as solicitor to the assignees, and
the debts are stated to be about £B,OOO, with assets nil.
(Before Mr. Commissioner Goulburn.)
IN RE GREGSGN.

This bankrupt was described as a linendraper, of 17, 18,
and 19, Beckford-row, Walworth, and to-day came up for
his order of discharge.

Mr. C. E. Lewis appeared for the bankrupt, and Mr.
Sargood for the assignees.

The accounts, by Mr. F. B. Smart, show—Debtor to
creditors unsecured, £13,000; do. holding security, £2,520.
Creditor, by debtors, £75 ; property in the hands of credi-
tors, £1,600 ; do. given up to the assignees, £3,362 ; and
deficiency, £10,587.

The matter has been before the Court for some time, and
was again adjourned.

IN RE H. RAPHAEL--JUDGMENT.
This bankrupt was described as a cigar merchant, of
Leman-street, Goodman's-fields, and to-day he came up for
judgment.

It appeared that proceedings had all been conducted out
of court, but the bankrupt now applied under the 110th
section for his order of discharge.

His Honour ruled that- as he was not satisfied that the
bankrupt had made a full disclosure of all his affairs, he
should refuse the order for the present.

Order refused.

Bishop Colenso's Case.—The Judgment.

The Judicial Committee this day delivered judgment on
the appeal of Dr. J. W. Colenso, Bishop of Natal, against
the sentence of Dr. Gray, Bishop of Cape Town and Me-
tropolitan of the Church in South Africa, deposing him
from his bishopric. It will be remembered that the first
stop in the matter of Dr. Colenso's petition to the Commit-
tee of Privy Council was taken on Monday, June 27, last
year, when the nature of the petition was stated by Mr. W.
M. James, Q.C. It prayed that her Majesty would be
pleased, to declare the petitioner (Dr. Colenso) to be entitled
to hold his see until the letters patent granted to him
should be cancelled by due process of law for some
sufficient cause of forfeiture, and to declare that the
letters patent granted to the Bishop of Cape Town,
so far as they purported to create a court of
criminal justice within the colony, and to give
to the Archbishop of Canterbury an appellate, juris-
diction, had been unduly obtained from her Majesty,
and did not affect the petitioner's rights. Their lordships
council
pht,
hoi hadruees.
"denying
aGaey alydannoygßdrwitt jurisdictionhi
hasht et ht
hßdil
eaei
Hs
nhvdeo.
judicial
upiDeinnorrfte.
thOvhcecaeeoorpmi
.semeeunTownbeeiethatct
m a
declined to entertain the question without fuller informa-
tion, and on December 14th the question again came before
oea
fdj uts
hnt
yed undersaid
aidprotest,
council
peti-
tion, or that any appeal lies from what he (the Right Rev-
tpe tree arMr
at:
committee
st
ioet rt
ee bei
either
of
fte hrt
he
to
os
ma
her
odes
rtc oh Majestymo
np o lainura t b
iol
nef
Privy Council." The case concluded by stating that Dr.
Colenso, not having availed himself of the liberty of appeal
to the Archbishop of Canterbury. against the sentence of
deposition as provided,
but having appealed to the Judicial
Committee of Privy Council, the appeal should not be
allowed for the following reasons :—" Ist. Because Dr.
Gray, as bishop of the see of Cape Town, and metropolitan
bishop, possesses full right and title to exercise the powers
and authority of metropolitan bishop upon and over the
suffragan bishops of the province of Cape Town, and upon
and over the Bishop of Natal, as one of such suffragan
bishops. 2dly. Because the petitioner received his said
bishopric of Natal, and was appointed and consecrated
thereto, upon the faith of his subjection and submission to
the said powers and authority of the said Dr. Gray, as such
metropolitan bishop ; and by reason of his solemn oath on
that behalf, freely and voluntarily submitted himself as suf-
fragan to the exercise of the power of the metropolitan
bishop, and became and was subject to those powers and
that authority. idly. Because the charges so preferred
and made in due form of law were such as Dr. Giay,
as Bishop of Cape Town and metropolitan bishop, was
not only fully entitled, but also solemnly bound to receive
and examine and to adjudicate and determine, and the
hearing and examination thereof were conducted in all re-
spects solemnly and properly, with all due regard to the
rights and interests of the:petitioners, conformably to legal
precedent and authority, and according to the rules and
also to the forms of law, so far as those rules and forms
were applicable and could be applied to such proceedings,
and the adjudication and determination were solemly
and properly made, and the said judgment and sentence
duly pronounced and promulgated according to the
duty, right, power, and authority of Dr. Gray, as Bishop
of Cape Town and metropolitan. 4thly. Because, look-
ing at the 'letters patent,. as constituting a contract
between Bishop Colenso and the Bishop of Cape Town,
any appeal, from the exercise of, authority by the latter
under the said lettere patent would be to the Arch-
bishop of Canterbury, while, on the other hand, any de-
parture from, or excess of the authority conferred by the
letters patent would be a proper subject of redress before
the civil courts of the colony, at the instance of the peti-
tioner. And if the petitioner should desire to impugn the
letters patent, as having been improvidently granted by the
Crown, the proper course for him to pursue would be by
proceedings to repeal the said letters patent." The matter
was on the 14th December elaborately argued before the
I Lord Kingsdown, Sir
On the part of Bishop
J.L
Colenso,o
Rr do ilMr.y
a nl
vd Chancellor,uis S.
L soa rm. dLe
James
se
(withr ah
i. n wg to
kor
nti
Mr. Pitzjames Stephen
and Mr. Westlake) prayed their. lordships to admit the
appeal. Sir R. J. Phillimore and Si IL Cairns, on the part
of Dr. Gray, prayed their lordships to advise her Majesty
to pronounce for protest, "and against the said pretended
complaint and appeal."
We shall give the decision in our next edition.