The Sun.
London, England, 1830-05-01 00:00:00

SCOTCH COURTS OF SESSION.

The LORD ADVOCATE moved the second reeding of
the Scotch Courts of Sessions Bill.
Sir CHARLES FORBES gave notice that he would
propose an augmentation of 1,0001. a-year to the salaries
of Scotch Judges.
Mr. R. GORDON pointed out the distinction between
the duties of the Scotch and English Judges, which was
greatly in favour of the former, from the better division of
labour.

After a few words from Mr. Houle and Mr. FERGUS..
sow, the Bill was read a second time, and ordered to be
committed on the 20th of May.
The other Orders of the Day being disposed of, the
House adjourned at Two o'clock.

MAGAZINE DAY.

NEW MONTHLY MAGAZINE

An infinitely better number than usual, as
regards first instruction, secondly, entertainment.
The article headed " Monos and Daimonos,"
is of a wild imaginative character, powerful, im-
passioned—eloquent, but repulsive and strained
in its effect. We think we can trace the style of the
author of " Pelham" in this article. " Coquetry"
is an easy playful article, light and superficial,
and gracefully expressed. " Anecdotes of Russia"
are for the most part new, they are highly amus-
ing. " A Brief Glance at the State of Parties"
is penned in a manly and energetic spirit. The
writer is a shrewd observer, though not without
prejudice. We give the following remarks on
Mr, Huskisson, as a specimen of the writer's
powers
" If ever man were placed in a more delicate trick m-
harrassing situation than another, as to the chances of
power, it is Mr. Huakisson. His own party is strong as
an ally—it is nothing as as a body. He attracts a consi-
derable notice--he may excite a very reasonable fear. He
is powerful as a part of opposition, but he could no more
form an Administration than Colonel Wilson or Sir Jo-
seph Yotke. Coalition is not only his evident, it is his
indensable policy ; but coalition with whom ?—there lies
the question. The Whigs?—What!—the Whigs hate
him, and Mr. Huskisson knows it. No man can pass a
night in the Howe of Commons, and not perceive the hit-
ter temper felt towards him by the and the of
that long-inem9ried body. Note how coldly fall his
speeches on the whcgtish ear ; note how loudly, how
ebuckingly bursts the applause when any one—even though
that one be Minister of the Home Department—refutes a
statement or retorts a reproach Denied coalition with the
Whigs,.-and we beg to rentlnd our readers that coalition
with the Whip is a very different thing from acqttaint-
anceslaip with Lord Lansdowne—will Mr. Huskisson lean
to rthe Tories—the High Tories? Some weeks since, it
was expected that he would ; and certain measures towards
a union between the two factions were (we use a coy, word)
suggeste4,
" Mr. Huskisson's speeches, since then, have proved
the suggestion was without fruit. Nor would it be less
than madness in him to dream of coalescing with a party
which, having considered hint the Julian of his country,
would now ask him to mend matters by becoming the
JuOs of his principles. Mr. Hpskisson, indeed, stands
upon an qllllllqoCe lofty and narrolv--one false step, and
his fall is inevitable. He has incurred doubt; he 114,
aroused hatred; he has forfeited power;—but hitherto he
has clung to one tenet, tine or false, and the tenacity of
his grasp has sayell 4lin,"