The Sun.
London, England, 1837-06-16 00:00:00

foenz their duty to their constituents." At Midsum-
mer Mr. Spring Rice is still Chancellor of the Ex-
chequer, and Sir William Molesworth has not per-
suaded a sin(de mercantile Member to ask him what
has become of the Budget. To-night oppor-
tnn:tv will be afforded for combating the
reluctance of the Right 1-1. 91.1Z;teranie 61ciikles
man. I-Ic announced on WedneOtty lilt intention
to tals; this cvenhig a vote or Stipply on ac-
count. We suppose Mr. Spring Rice was ashamed
to give notice of this unusual procedure hittiSelt, for
he delegated the task of giviilg notice to Lord John
Russe:l ; and ;.t_ippose Lord John Russell was alto-
("ether incapable of a..counting for the step, for .he de-
legated the task of accotintitT fir it to Mr. Francis
Baring. We trust, however, that the Chancellor of
the Exchsquer %yid he induced to explain this evening
why he will nut proceed with his estimates, and with'
his stasemcnt, and with his Budget, like an ordinary
Chancellor of the Exchequer : and if the gentlemen
who hold for their maxim "whatever was, was wrong,"
arc determined that even our money matters shall he
done in a new fashion we beg them to take care that
they be not done in a worse.—Morning Post.
That England is without a Govet nment we have
felt compelled to reiterate and to press on the attention
of our countrymen. The afflicting state of suspense
in which his Majesty's affectionate subjects are now
held but aggravates this most grave con-i leration. We
only express the universal sentiment of this nation
when saying, that throughout the late petiod of trying
political struggle—a successful struggle for the preser-
vation of the Constituticri *it all its integrity—the
eves of his Majesty's subjects, from the eminent states-
man down to the humblest individual, have been di-
rected with confidence and hope to the paternal protec-
tion of a truly English King. Yet should we, unhap-
pily, by the dispensation of Providence, be deprived of
that protecting care which has hitherto been
the steadfast trust of Englishmen, the interests
of this kingdom in Church and State will render
it hnperative that the same line of uncompromising
loyalty should be pursued which under other circum-
stances was contemplated by the best friends of the
Constitution. The Crown must be humbly called upon
to interfere. An address from both Houses of Par-
liament should be laid at time foot of the throne, im-
ploring that this country and its manifold interests, re-
ligious, political, and commercial, should at all events
not be left without the guidance of an efficient, a pa-
triotic, and a nationally responsible Government. The
faction now usurping the functions of Government
declaim through their organs of the press, against
what they call the dead-lock to which legislation has
come under the present Administration. And a
" dead-lock "it truly is. But why is it so ? Because
a Popish plot, encouraged against a Protestant Con-
stitution by the dregs of Ythiggery and the scum
of Radicalism, is resisted by the nobility, the
learning, and the chivalry of England. This is
our view of the case. Of course the faction will
clamour and rave in the opposite direction, declaring
that they themselves are loyal to the King, devoted to
the Constitution in Church and State, instrumental in
advancing the national interests, and tender of the na-
tional glory. Then they can have no objection to the
motion, which we expect soon to see some independent
Member of the House of Commons—some gentleman
who by his social and political position stands beyond
the reach of party—submitting to the Commons
House of Parliament. An address to the Crown to
appoint a firm and efficient Administration—an Ad-
ministration composed of men able and willing to
serve the country without reference to the obsolete
distinctions of party, or to the degrading considera-
tions of self—an Administration, in short, which,
combining the wisdom, the energy, the experience,
and the undaunted patriotism of that great public
body who are determined to preserve this Pro-
testant
Monarchy—an address, praying for such an
Administration must, under any circumstances, bring
the question to this simple point—whether the country
is to be subject to an unprincipled faction, or an en-
lightened Government ? All classes of his Majesty's
subjects arc interested in this question: and -not less is
the Throne of these kingdoms interested therein. It
will not be disputed by any one, from Lord J. Russell
to Mr. Roebuck, that, apart from Church considera-
tions, the policy of his Majesty's present Government
has tended to weaken the Monarchical principle. To
what, then, do these politicians aspire ? Mr. Roebuck
says he would abolish the House of Lords altogether,
a wish which, though more openly avowed, is not more
earnestly entertained by him than by the Molesworths,
the Humes, the Wakleys, and Harveys, composing the
incongruous faction. Of the " tail" we say nothing.
Their object is definite, the destruction of the Protestant
Church. We are now speaking of the maintenance of the
Monarchy. If the blundering persons now pottering
with the destinies of this nation have any design what-
ever, it must be to maintain themselves in power, at all
hazards. In this it is possible, and we think merely
possible, that they may for a time succeed. Yet in
that time, however short, some advance must neces-
sarily be made towards the fearful consummation of
the downfall of the British throne. If it were possible
for a 'Whig oligarchy to control the independent aris-
tocracy of the kingdom, then we should have a state of
things for which, in its palmy days, that oligarchy in-
variably strove—a state of things, be it remembered,
the manifest object of which was to control the Crown,
and to make the King a puppet in the hands of a ty-
rannous majority, If, on the other hand, Lord J.
Russell's more boisterous supporters should gain the
ascendant, the reign of mob-dominion must commence,
and the Whigs, who had provoked and fostered the
political plague to a fatal tyranny, would only have the
miserable satisfaction of seeing the pillars of the mo-
narchy fall before they themselves were crushed ben,:ath
its mins. If history be indeed philosophy teaching by
examples, wilt any man deny the picture which we
have drawn is a faithful one ? If it be faithful, it is
clear that the tendency of Ministerial measures, not
,ess than the pressing nature of political exigencies,
demands the immediate emancipation of the country
from Whig-Radical misrule.--Times.

LICENSED VICTUALLER'S ASYLUM

Yesterday a Special General Meeting of the Donors of this
benevolent Institution was held at the Asylum, Old Kent.
road, to elect Peren occupants to seven houses vacant in the
Institution. The attendance of Donors was very numerous
and respectable.
Mr. 13a►.mty, Chairman of the Trustees and Committee,
was in the Chair,

There were 16. candidates, all donors of the institution.
At three o'clock the ballot closed, and the donors and can.
didate*. agoembled in the Board-room,
The CAMIIMAN called on the Secretary to read the result,
tnitn which it appeared that the following names and num.
bers were the highest on the list, viz. :
Ann Sparrow 6,442 Joseph Nightingale 4,2.13
James Seaward - 3.619

Susannah French .. 4;657 f William Ridley 3:)66

'Mary Nelson
Tiie CHAIRMAN then declare,
congratulated them on being ,
stituthns in the country.

,a them to be duly elected, and,
elected into one of the first In.

0
NEWSPAPERS IN PARIS.—M. Bou-
I cher, the responsible editor, Messrs. Richard and Anthony
Dugdale, the proprietors, and Mr. Aciand, the director of the
late Paris Sun, appeared before the tribunal of Correctional
police, upon a prosecution for publishing that journal without
depositing the requisite caution_money, and without making
the necessary declaration. The-Paris Sun succeeded the
London and Paris Courier. The caution money deposited
for the latter paper was withdrawn by those who had advanced
it ; nevertheless, the Paris Sun continued to al•pear for about
seven months. The case having been gone through, the
Court rendered its judgment to the following effect :—Consi-
dering that Jules Boucher, the responsible editor, Richard
Dugdale and Anthony Dugdale, the proprietors, and J. Ac-
land, the director, have, in the course of 1836 and 1537, pub-
lished a journal intitled the Paris Sun, without having depo-
sited the caution money required by the law of the 9th of Sep-
tember, 1835, or making the declaration required by the law
of the 18th July, 1828--considering that the Paris Sun had
no connection with the London and Paris Courier, and con-
sequently the caution money deposited on the foundation of
that journal, could not in any manner, after its extinction, be-
nefit another journal published by other proprietors, and that
even this caution-money, which belonged exclusively to tie
shareholders of the London and Paris Courier, far from being
conceded to the shareholders of the Paris Sun, was with.
drawn—Boucher, R. Dugdale, A. Dug-dale, and Acland, have
rendered themselves guilty of violating Art. 13 of the law of
November 9, 1833 ; Art. 6of the law of July 18, 1828 ; and
Art. 6 of the law of July 9, 1819—declares seizure good itnd
valid, and condemns them to bo imprisoned for one month,
and to pay a tine of 200 fr. each. After the judgment was pro-
nounced, M. Puincot, the substitute to the procureur du Roi,
recommended the parties to petition the King for an act of
grace.