The Sun.
London, England, 1863-12-04 00:00:00

LITERATURE.

Sir Guy de Guy. A Stirring Romaunt. By
Rattlebrain. Illustrated by Phila. One vol.,
pp. 167. Routledge and Co.

Any one who may remember Mr. Alphabet
Baillie's new Tale of a Tub, will understand at once
our meaning, when we say that Sir Gay de Guy is
akin to it. The adventures related in that won-
derfully absurd narrative, also in rhyme, also
grotesquely illustrated, were those of a certain
couple who had gone out to enjoy themselves in
a sort of pic-nic together in (of all places in the
wide world for a picnic !)—the desert—the level,
trackless, sandy wilderness! Who that ever saw
that preposterous book has lost a recollection of is ?
Who has net an almost painfully ludicrous remem-
brance of the unlucky pair who were the heroes
of those memorable adventures ? The long thin
friend and the short stout friend—we forget
their names now, or even, for that matter, if
they had any ! The empty barrel they took
out into the desert with them—to employ at
p:easure as—a store place for their provisions,
a table to dine from, a chair or stool to sit on, a
wooden sort of tent or screen from the sun if propped
edgeways, or—don't we recall to mind what else be-
sides ? A shelter from—more than the noonday sun !
A trap—far more than merely to catch a sunbeam
How the long and the short of it was this—that the
lean and the fat friend were startled from their en-
joyment of the good things brought by them into the
desert in the empty barrel, were startled from their
enjoyment of those good things by the apparition
of a raging, ravaging, wild Tiger ! How they
dodged the tiger to and fro and all round and round
the barrier of that empty barrel ! How, in the
tussle with the tiger, they got into all sorts of rela-
tive position with him and the barrel—now the long
one, now the short one, now the lean one, now the
fat one, getting into the most fearful jeopardy, and
then in the very nick of time getting out of it again
—who could possibly say or sing but Mr. Baillie, who
imagined it, or the illustrator whose comical pencil
so marvellously realised his imaginings ? Until—
somehow or another—between the two friends (we
don't mean the poet and the artist, but the two heroes,
the stout one and the thin one) they managed to
get their enemy, the tiger, caged under the empty
barrel which they then sat down upon for safety's
sake. Despair being even then, however, before them
in the desert—seeing that they could not possibly
contrive to leave off sitting on the barrel in order to
run away, without, by so doing, of course, enabling
the caged tiger to scramble out and run after them.
Everyone who ever saw the work remembers, to be
sure, how they did contrive to get off at last, and
with safety. Namely, through the happy circum-
stance of the tiger, while wriggling about inside
and lashing his tail about in wrath at being
kept thus in ignoble durance, getting the tip of
that tail of his (by an unlucky chance for him)
through the bunghole. Whereupon the fat friend
and the lean friend, holding on to the tip of that
same protruding tail like grim death, haul it out by
superhuman Efforts, hand over hand, as if it were a
coil of rope—haul it out gradually down to
the very root—then tying it securely into
a very tight knot—and so off—the long
and the short of them, grinning, and quite
at their leisure out of the wilderness.
Well, precisely such another book as that was, is
this Romaunt of Sir Guy de Guy—the very
height of absurdity—the most ludicrous extra-
vagance, well imaginable—full of the most impos-
sible adventures—dashed off currente ealamo, in
rhyme by Rattlebrain—embellished with fifty won-
derfully ridiculous illustrations by oar old friend
Phiz. Seriously to criticise such a book as
this would be worse than breaking a but-
terfly on a wheel, it would be more like
roasting it cruelly before an exceedingly slow fire I
All that the reader or :the critic has to do with
such a production, is to turn over the leaves, and
laugh at it, and then throw it aside. The getting
up of the work appears to us to be far better than
the contents of it can be said in any way to merit.
As a new book, it retlects the highest credit upon
—the publishers I Laughing at it, we must confess,
has been for us rather wearisome—the thing is just
simply too absurd. It is the very exaggeration. of ex-
trevagance in the way—we cannot say of humour, for
that is always delightful, and we can never have
too much of it ! But we will say of broad farce and
outrageous comicality. Guy Straggles, afterwards
Sir Guy De Guy is the hero. The Lady Arabella,
daughter of Sir Hildebrand, is the heroine. Their
adventures all over the world are the incidents re-
lated. How outre those adventures are, we don't
care to particularize. They are beyond us altogether.
As a piece of fun, we suppose it is capital. And
to those who can read, mark, learn, and inwardly
digest anything so very rich as this same piece of
fns before us, we may venture to commend it.
Certainly to none more seriously inclined than the
unaffected lovers of—what we ourselves (we confess
it) most unaffectedly detest and abominate—bur-
lesques, parodies, travesties, extravaganzas, tom-
fooleries in fact of all sorts and descriptions.

The Cause of Lord Stamford's Retirement

from the Turf.

" iiarkaviay," in a letter to the Morning Herald,

writes :

" With respect to Lord Stamford's retirement from the
turf, no one can be in the least surprised at the resolution
arrived at immediately he witnessed the performance of
Limosina for the Cambridgeshire. My only surprise is that
his lordship had not retired from the turf in disgust long
ere this. His career has been one marked with honourable
intentions and the pure love of sport, but no owner of horses
has had to contend with so many or such a continued series
of expensive blunders or mortifyingmishaps during the three
years the turf has been honoured by his presence. It will be
remembered that at Goodwood, the year before last, his
lordship ran a mare called Provision against Contadina and
Mr. Hall's mare. Ho then laid £3,000 to £2,000 on the two
opposed to his own animal. The result was his own mare
won, and he lost the £3,00f). Walloon won the Cham-
pagne at Doneaster and he never backed it for sixpence,
although it lost when he backed it at Newmarket for £2,000.
When Diophantus cantered in for the Two Thousand
Guineas at Newarket he scarcely won anything on, the
race, as ho backed Imaus to win £30,000, because, in a
trial the last named, by some cause or Other, was made
to beat Diophantus with a stone in hand. At Ascot his
lordship laid 6 to 1 on Diophantus, and Link positively
beat him., Shortly after that Diophantus met with an
accident, and was never able to race again. Ensign was
also heavily backed for the Derby, but he cut up very
badly. This year Brick was broken ddwn from the effects
of a severe but satisfactory trial, and will never be able to
race again. His lordship also backed Automaton to win a
large stake for the Derby, but on receiving a telegram to
the effect that the horse was dead lame he scratched him at
once. The next day he found the horse was quite sound.
Since then he has died. For the St. Leger his lord-
ship backed Avenger to win a large stake, although a
veterinary surgeon had examined him before he - was
backed, Mad had crOnounced his opinion that the horse
was sure to break down. Whether that opinion ever
reached Lord Stamford's eats I am not in a position to
stater The last act, however, was the Limosina busi-
ness and, the Cambridgeshire. It is soon told. His
lordship backed her to win an immense stake. The
mate *as as well as any animal could -be on the
morning Of the race, but from her appearance when at
the post, and the fact that the poor thing could not get half
a mile, it was the opinion of good judges that she had
been poisoned, and her wretched appearance to-day
leads to the infcreno3 that It is still in her system.
Again, If toM Stamford ever wanted to back his horses
for any of the handicaps he found that othpetristiaasi;
had obtained his etalyle information
vaekeir:
coolly
yforeeftsetarleldedhhimim6
exult was
a field of a dozen or fifteen runners. the
or
three
he very properly ecratcbed his horses
unprincipled fore-
°t
o 6411caganniner h inst rt ehlpaht6t- ene seri tka.tr
occasional for the doing,' Of whicihh ow out dirty insinua
stallers have thotigla proper to
a. rcharge nor a statement,
ew incapable ahpaavbel e
no
tions, which neither atironnte to
paned, Every one who
to the effect that hie horse 11.4 re
Suehave bellevetl these silly but xnio-
realhlyapre knowseproceeding
Lord; Sbtaaraofhored rerio;siaih e
means of knowing, may
chievous reports. If Levi Stamford had only turned a
deaf ear to the Sir Lucius O'Triggers who hav,' hovered
about him-OmM without brains, and who never (Quid
win a shillin for themselves—ho would have had a more
satisfactory career. He is a good horseman—in fact, a
good sporteman—and if he cannot manage his own horses
no one else can. Let the result be what it may, the poor
widows and orphans at _Newmarket will miss his bounty."

We learn with much pleasure that Sir John
Lawrence has recognised the services of Sir Charles Hatha-
way, who, as Inspector• General of Prisons in the Punjaub,
hag laboured with so much success in ameliorating the state
of the gaols in that province, by appointing that gentleman
to be his private secretary,