The Sun.
London, England, 1863-03-05 00:00:00

ROME..

The Marquis of NOIDIAN.BY complained of an omis-
sion which had been made of a portion of a despatch he had
written shortly after the breaking out of the insurrection in
Rome in 1849, portions only of the document being pub-
lished two years afterwards. He was not to blame for
bringing up the sul ject so frequently, as it had been intro-
duced by the noble earl's quoting the despatch which had
not been produced. It was of the greatest importance that,
when the descatches of an Ambassador to his Government
were published, his meaning should be fully represented,
and that the extracts should not be mutilated.
Earl RUS,ELL supposed that the person who presented
the despatch to Parliament omitted the words because he
thought them unimportant, and it had been for years before
Parliament, so that the mat ter was not of so much import-
ance. It appeared the words had been left out by the person
leaving off at a comma instead of a full atop ; but it
could not serve any purpose now to inquire into such a
mitter, especially as it occurred so many years ago.
NAVAL COAST VOLUNTEERS At.,lT AMEND-
ThisN bill was read a third time and passed.
Their lordships then adjourned.

HOUSE OF COMMONS—This Evening.
he SPEAKER took the chair at four o'clock.
PRIVATE TELEGRAPH COMPANY.
The second reading of this bill was postponed until to-
morrow.

PETITIONS.
By Mr. C. TURNER, from Salford, and Mr. Alderman
SYDNEY, from Stafford, and others, against the Ministers'
Prison Bill; Mr. M. MILNES, from Pontefract, complain-
ing of the inquisitorial nature of the income tax, and pray-
ing that incomes under 1150 may be exempted from the
operation of the tax; against the Fire Insurance duty, and
in favour of a modification, from Dublin, by Sir E. GE.OGAN;
Sir W. G. BANTER., from Wells, Sir F. SMIIII, from Chat-
ham, anhon. member, from Spalding, Col SYKES, from Indian
officers, complaining of the amalgamation, and praying for
inquiry; Mr. HODGSON, from Carlisle, complaining of the
laws regulating deep sea fisheries and the use of the trawl
nets ; Mr. F. PEEL, Bury, Lancashire, complaining of the
law regulating the granting of licences to public-houses;
Mr. HENNESSY, irons various places in England, in favour
of the maintenance by this country of the independence of
Poland ; Sir G. C. LEWIS, against the sale of intoxicating
liquors on the Sabbath.
EAST INDIA (TEA PLANTATIONS).
On the motion of Mr. EWART an address was agreed
to for copies of any reports made to the Government on the
tea plantations in India.
THE DISTRESSED OPERATIVES IN LAN-
CASHIRE.
Mr. FERRAND gave notice that as soon as possible
after Easter he should call the attention of the house to the
condition of the cotton trade, with the view of inducing the
house to consider whether measures could not be adopted
to remove the unemployed operatives, who, for so long a
pericd, had remained in unwilling idleness. (Hear, hear,
and laughter.)
NAVAL PRIZE MONEY.
Sir J. HAY asked the Secretary to the Admiralty, in
reference to a notice in the Gazette of Friday the 26th ult.,
suspending payment of certain naval prize money which
had been due since 1857, and which had been recently ad-
vertised to be distributed, what was the cause of this fur-
ther delay, and whether it was not due to the want of pro-
per agents to take charge of the interest of the captors?
Lord C. PAGET replied that no delay hal taken place
on the part of the Admiralty in the distribution of the prise
money in question. Ihe money was delivered to the Ad-
miralty for distribution on the 9th of December last. On
the 19th of February last orders were given by the Admi-
ralty for its distribution. Since that period some officers
of tne ship Niger, not included in the list, had claimed a
share of prize money. The distribution had, therefore,
been delayed until these claims were investigated. The
captors had agents both in this country and at the spot.
ECCLESIASTIUAL COURTS.
Mr. H. SE YMO UR asked the Secretary of State for the
Horne Department whether it was the intention of her Ma-
jesty's Government to introduce this session any measure
ti
o Chancellor a:Le ltlho
that
tohf
for the reform of the Ecclesiastical Courts and Registries?
Sir G. GREY was understood to say that his hon. friend
thea
het should
shortly
had
itsuocuti
thea biltlaibnleport epa-
rthe
house.

CHURCH BUILDING ACTS.
Mr. H. SEYMOUR asked Mr. Solicitor• General, if the
Church Building Acts bad been consolidated; and, if so,
when her Majesty's Government would introduce a bill
upon the subk.ci ?
Mr. R. PALMER was understood to say that the acts
referred to bad been consolidated, and that the measure
would be ihtroduced before Easter.

POLAND.
Mr. HENNESSY (Lord Palmerston not yet being in
his place) postponed asking an imp.rtant question of which
he had given notice until to-morrow.
rJOR LAWS.
Mr. HIBBERT asked the President of the Pnor Law
Board whether it, was his intention ,to move for the re-ap-
pointment of the select committee on the administration of
the poor laws; and, if so, whether he would defer the in-
troduction of the bill to continue the poor law board until
such committee should have reported to the house?
Mr. VILLIERS ret.lied that it was his intention to move
for the reappointment of the col:mitt e referred to. He
should lay the report on the table of the house before he in-
troduced the bill to continue the Poor-law Board.
NEW WESTMINSTETREET RIDGE—BRIDGE
S.

Sir J. SHELLEY asked the First Commissioner of
Works, when the houses left standing on the south side of
Bridge-s treet were to be entirely removed, and whether or
not arrangements have been made with the tenants in
possession for giving up their interests; if not, what was
the course the Office of Works intended to pursue with
regard to that portion of the property ?
Mr. COWPER replied that several of the houses on the
south of Bridge-street had been removed, and the whole
of them would be taken down without any unreasonable
delay. All the owners had been agreed with excepting Fen-
dell's Hotel, a place of much resort during the sitting of
Parliament, would not be interfered with for a short while
longer, so that the public purse Would not be unduly
trenched upon at present for compensation.

The Royal Marriage--The Procession and
the Arrangements.

Sir G. BOWYER asked the Secretary of State for the
Home Department whether, having regard to the desire of
the citizens of London to show all possible respect to her
Royal Highness the Princess of Denmark, and the wish of
the public outside the City to see the full solemnity of the
procession next Saturday, arrangements would be made for
the Lord Mayor and the City procession to attend her
Royal Highness as far as Paddington? (Hear hear.) It
was, he believed, generally understood that the procession
would proceed from Temple-bar to Paddington at a rapid I
pace.
Captain STACPOOLE inquired if any suitable !daces
had been reserved for members of that house?
Sir. G. GREY replied that this was the first time he
had heard that the procession would proceed at a rapid
pace from Temple-bar to Paddington. This would most
certainly not be the case. (Hear.) He thought, however,
that he explained the whole course of proceeding the
other night. The city authorities would retire from the
eortege at Temple-bar, giving way then to the authorities
of Westminster. The Lord Chamberlain had within
1 Ole last fevr hours received a letter from the Lord
me,yor
expressing his entire satisfaction, and that
of 4`lB other City authorities, at the arrangements that had