The Sun.
London, England, 1806-02-19 00:00:00

Tomlinsons, andThomSons, Copthall-touri, Throg-
morton-street.
Stephen WOmsley, of Ormskirk, Lancashire, brewer, to
surrender March 13, at six, 14, and April 1;• at‘eleven, at
the Wheat Sheal, Ormskirk. Attornies, Mr. Tho Mas
hlackstock, St Mildrcdis,court, Poultry, London ;' or
Messrs. .Wright and Palmer, Ormskirk. •
William Armytage, now or late•ofShelf, Halifax, Yorkshire,
cotton and woollen card-maker, to surrender March 6,7,
and April 1, at ten, at the Talbot Inn, Hall tax. A ttornies,
Mr. 4Slleswonit, ray's I mi, London ;or Messrs. Wigles-
worth and Thompson, Halifax. -
Robert Davies, of Enfield Wash, N'ilddlesex,- potat3e-mer-
• • chair, to surrender eb. 23,•at eleven, March 8; and April
t, at tell, at G utldhall. Attorney, Mr. Hughes, Clifford's-
! no.
Henry Rock, late of Unian-cpurt, Broad-street, London,
jewelleri to surrender Feb 22, March I,'and.29, at ten, at
~utklitall, Attornies, Messrs. Kibblewhite and Rowland,
Gray's-Jim-place. - -
John Bundock, of Great Eastcheap, London, 42nd of Turn-,
ham-G Leen, MiddlcseK; corn-
.to summate!' leb. 25,
at ten, March t, and 'April _I, at eleven, at Guildhall. At-
torney, Mr. I;rovrn, Little Friday-street,.Cheapside.
Janie A of• Ifirininghani, nierchant, _to' surrender
Feb. 2,13. Nlarch t, and April 1, at eleven, at the Royal.
Hotel, Bitmi,igham. 'Amrnies,• T‘li.ssrs. =Lee alit'. Collie,
or''Mr. -Alexau&r, Bedford-row, London.
Luke Gyerrier, of Stepney, Middlesex, cow-keeper, to.sqr-
"tenderyeb. 25, March 4. and April t, at ten', at Guildhall.
A ttorticy, Mr. Burt,- Could-squire, Crutened- friars.
Golden Lee Gibson, of Colchester, Essex,• tailor, to stirren.
der March 5,6, and April I, at ten, at the i•;;itlin, Col-
_cheSter, Attornies; .IVII,. Thomas Hedge, Colchester; or
Messrs. Swaine and Stevens,' Old Jewry, London.

DIVIDENDS. •
March ;S. James Niblock and George Burgesi. of Bristol,
ltnen-cLapers and co- partne,s, at eleven, at the_ Rummer
Tavern, All Saints-lane, Bristol.
April 12. li',:njainin Sinito the younger, and John Cherry, of
Red Lion-street, Middlesex, watch-manufacturers and co-
partners, at ten, at Guildhall,. London.
March -25. Thomas Holland, of Bedfardbury, Middlesex,
woollen-draper, at twelve, at Guildhall.
March ;t. Thomas Burberry, of Sun-street, 'Bishopsgate-
, street, London, weaver, at eleven, at Guildhall.
March is. William Winch, of Tothill-weet, Westminster,
butcner, at ten, at Guildhall.
March ;8. Henry Saxhy, of Charlton, Kent, market-gar-
dener, at twelve, at Guildhall. London.
March tI. Peter Desmarais, ot ,St. Martin's-court, Middle-
sex, watchinaker' at ten, at Guildhall. ' ' -
March 14. Edward Marston, now or late of Utoxeter, Star-
fildshire, cork-cutter, at twelve, at the Three Queens,
Burton-upon-Trent.
March r;. tosepli Squire, late of Exeter, tallow-chandler and

sod p-lioilwer, at eleven, at the Hotel, Exeter.
March ii. Thomas Kirkpatrick, late of . Church- passage,
Cateaton-street,, London, merchant, at ten, at Guildhall:
CERT IF! C /IT HS.

March tr. John Boyes, late of Welklose-square, Middlesek,

. .
wine-merchant.
Samuel Hull Wilcocke, of Liverpool, merchant.
William Irving, of LiVerpoof, merchant. •
Henry. Pennington, of Liverpool, monepscrlvener,.
William Evill, cif Bath,. uplivider. •'
john Wright, of Newgate-street, London, grocer..

LAW REPORT.

COURT 9F CHANCERY, Fla.' r 7.

' . . . . • . , .
SITTINGS IS ZPORE THE'. 111ASTFIt OF T112..P.01.L5, IN LIN.
' .. ,COLN'tI'INN NAI.I.:' ' -

LORD.,VISCOtigi' SOU'iIIIXTALT:: V. BEAItELVY.

, . 1
Counsel
..,,.
This morning the arguments of in.,:this
~,
cause were resUmed.i.. and - ,I*i.*c LIFyOIiD. and, Mr.-
PLON('DEN,
,for the Defendant, . were, heard-at con-
siderable length. , The Ledrned Counsel dweit.upon,
the improbability of the gronyd.upon.NN:hiph this
suit was alledged to-be founded, .„It, was ,stated. to
have -resulted. from inadvertence,pn the pia ofthe
, Plaintiff,' who executed an instknmentwhich ,413*:
I-
solved - the 'deceased . guardian 'from . further: respon,
Sibility, -and -acknowledged the adjitstMent. of the
Minors'. accounts. . But how could such a plea.
be horrestlyi.nrgest w.hen..it appeared, tiiat.tworyearl
after the execution of that releae, and nearly
as long after the Marriage of the Plaintiff. N•it,ll , the
Lady, the fear of:losing whovi,''hy any impediment
which .might
hive arisen from a scrupulous investi-
gation of the accounts, was urged as an excuse foe,
alledged inadvertence ? .Two years after that time,,
in a conveyance of-part of the,estate .which was
• made,the release of the Defendant, - which had been
executed, was adverted 'to and confirmed. .In
watching the interests of infant wards, the Court
would not so far alarm all persons,who stood ,in the
i
.
mpiKtant and arduous situation of guardians, as to,
grant the obje& of thisyetition, and say, that years
after all accounts are reasonably looked upon. as ad—,
kfsted, and a release* being obtained,, vouchers of
expenditure are no longer carefully pre-served, they
shall be called-upon. to, re-State those ,accounts, and
.be subjefted to,the imputation of having dealt dis-
honestly, if they are 'not then in a conditiontoProVe
thelairness and necessity of every charge upon, and
disbursement of, their wards' estates ; which, hav-
ing once satisfailorily accounted for, they no
,longer
,treasure the proof of. For the
.dedu'etions stated
to be improperly made from the profits and produce
of
' the Minors' estates in the present case, satisfac-.
tort' cause was shewn. . There Were various
mort-
gages,,.-:. with which, at the time of the deeease of
the minors' parents, the estates were charged, and.
which were necessary deductions frOm the prOduce;
the estates had also been involved in Chancery suits ;
..but, notwithstanding these-incumbrances, they had,
under the `care and management of the deceased,
' guardian, upon whose memory the Stigma of dis-
honesty
was now attempted to be
.attxed, become.
produ6tive to his wards to an extent, which could
not have .been anticipated. :
Mr. ALEXWNDER, in reply, observed, that what,
had fated- froth the Counsel for the Defendant in '
no wise disproved the- reasonableness and necessity.
of this-application to the Court, for an investigation
of accounts involving.. great sums of money, and:
which the evidenee of, lt.. Butler, :the Professional,
-Gentleman to whoni they had.at one tithe byeu re-
ferred for adjustment, fully_proved had been passed
over greatly to the prejudice
,of, the l'etitioners.
There were tinny charges wide against the estates
of the wards,ffor which their guardian liad*doubly
compenSated himself. ' For the' Mortgages Which
formed items of the accounts against:them,- he
enjoyed all, the tithber which the estates produced,
~
an equivalent, as well as for the 'hoard and ac-1
conamodation ofthe young- Udies under his
tion :. and yet this -too -Was made the'subje6t` of a
heavy charge. pm the conveyance whi6 was al:-
luded to, or what it might Contain,-could affe6t the
question at issue,
.the Learned Col:nisei- said he could
not echiceiv`e. : It was- 'trite the •141'Aitifi- bad *disk
, . , ..., , , did
posed of the pfoperty, 'out.tnat not preVent his.
yecovering ..w4 at- a • 'dU6 to him, in riglit of his
Wile, from her'guardian, -o`r his representative. For :
'ace pegusal Of 'some deeds which the Cbwasei roe the i
liefendaq..had ,t.ffis. day produced, he .Bored the ;1
Court would indulge hich with leisure until to-mor- !
row. ;With this* reqiies t• the MASTER -of 'the ROdS ;1
,complied, and.the Court rose. ' *-'''' ;'' s