The Sun.
London, England, 1837-11-22 00:00:00

SPLENDID ANNUAL, 1835.

VINISEN'S TABLEUX:
or, PICTURESQUE SCENES, illustrative of NA-
TIONAL CHARACTER, BEAUTY, and COSTUME, with
large and beautifully-engraved Plates.
Edited by MISS MITFORD,
Author of " Our &c. &e.
‘. Really gorgeous—The literature 13 choice in kind. The little
stories, and especially Miss Mitford's contributions, " English
Edith " for instance, with her hippy loves, and the piquant " Wa-
ger," arc exactly of that light and graceful description which is
most suitable to such works as the present."—Tait's Magazine.
"An Annual of the same class to which the Flowers of Loveli-
ness,' and Gems of Beauty,' belong, and it is superior to both in
its plans and execution."—Spectator.
Imperial 4to, superbly bound in morocco, 2/. 2s.
India Proofs, 3/. 3s.
• Charles Tilt, Fleet-street.

Just published, price I/. I Is. 6d.,
THE AUTHORS OF ENGLAND.
Fifteen large and beautiful Plates, engraved in the new
bas-relief style, with Biographical and Critical Sketches,
By HENRY F. CHOItLEY,
Author of " Memorials of Mrs. Hemans,"
A few Copies with India Proofs, 2/. 12s.
" The Authors of England is an Annual of the first magnitude
and importaxce. It is ei,mposed of a group of fourteen of the most
popular writers of poetry and fiction in our own times, departed as
well as living—each set in a rich frame-work of tasteful device.
The volume is superbly got n ; the embossed cover, with its hand-
some badge, is very elegant."—Speetator.
" This, for the present season, shall be Our Annual. The plates
are exquisitely engraved."—Ather teum.
Charles Tilt, Fleet-street.

This day was published, price 2s. 6d.
THE COMIC ALMANACK for 1838, Illus-
trated with Twelve hit norous Plates by GEORGE
CRUIKSHANK : an Hieroglyphic, and other embellishments,
with a great.variety of amusing matter.
Copies of the Almanacks fur former years, neatly bound in
2 vols., cloth, price 12s. may still be had.
Charles Tilt, Flect-street.

THE MARKETS.

COUNTRY CORN MARKETS.

! W heat.

13:trley. I Unto. livant

Pc ate.

—.---,--
I'cr Quarter. s. to s. Is.to s. 6. to s, Is.to s. s.
11.ston ....... 4l 51 23 ..-6 15 21 32 42
Gal nsborough — 55 32 23 42
Grati t h an
(1 rimsl, y .... :.2 6' cg • 32 IS 26 13ti 40 I
—II ormast le 4' 60 32 37 20 •24 136 42
Lincoln 4O 58 i2l 33 16 27 40 4+
Spalding
Stamford -N 56 28 31 21 25 36 41
York l5O 36 26 N-I 21 26 32 41

= DUBLIN MAR.

IRISH MARKETS.
KEE' NO FE Sro ;it ‘VEER ENDING N V. IT

Front To A •er Jig,
11 Wheat, pert,. rel t'it tonne ll n :II 0 t 8 8
In Ilere lO stone I II 0 12 o 1 i 0
CUt 13arley
1,110 this
16,;,:32 Flour, per cwt ... F. ,' •,,- 0 0 '2O 0 -- - 0
323 °Minced ---. A stone lO 0 13 0 I I I
•
Sold to Bakers only.
13,^_,^,1 Cwt. Flour
Average price of I\thelt nd Flour 43. 41. per sack
Firsts
1 from 1%. Uri. to 1.0. O.
Receipts of :'lour, !‘2,6in seconds .
Sales of Do Ifir.:2 Tnird,
TRIG OF !MEAD.
..1144. I' Half Quartern 414 rt

9oartern Loaf

17 111

CORK MARKETS,—Nov. IS
When (per 205t.)...13s ell to 20:. (hi. Oats (per 140.) 6l. os4. to 10$ fid,
B MI
Barley (per
t.)... o 0 14 0 Flour (per cwt ) 7 0 20 0
Oatmeal (per cwt.) IN, (Id. to Itic 141
Meet, 4d. to tid. ; 111uttou, 4d. to lid. ; Veal, 4:1. to dd. ;
Pork, 4d. to 4;d. ; Fresh Rutter, 101. to lid. per lb
PrtICZ Or istrrum.
'l'o the Merchants,
First Quality
Secend ... lit
Third
Fourth 76
Fifth
Sixth

To Cie Countr!
........... 345.

CLON MM.'. M.
Per
s. d. s. .1.
New Butter
Oatrne,l l2 6 73 6 BacAn Pig% 31i
La
Rendered rd I 9 44 0 Heads 20

A tiKETS.-Ntv: 18
Cwt

s. d. 11. a•
e to :ii 8
0 42 8
0
0

0
it 14

..... _
Per Bag.
Flour, Second ......'lO st 0 I Flour, Thirds 9,
1 iOl/ SC h01d... 6 0 73 0: F.,' tt-hs 11
Per Part-el.
Rapeseed '0 0 0 I
Con's Barley 12 0 13. p
PS 4 1!) 0 ere
re: Stolle.
iV heat.. Ol5 0 '2.-1 'Pallois 04,ii:;',4) 1 0 4 0
Cats

•ILKEN NY mARKErs.
Wheat (per barrel) IS, K
3d. to 9 19. lid. Beer (pet 1b..... •-... Os. %d. to 0* 5.,
Barley 9 9 II 9 Mutton 0 3 ° 5
02ts - 2 0 X
Flour (per bag) ... IS 0 :320 0 Veal 0 4 0 i
Ituttcr (per cwt.)... 92 0 9i 0 Fresh Fattier OlO I °
Bacon rigs
Coals lO 1 1 Potatoes (pm' 5t.)... 0 2 0 3

SCOTCH MARKETS.
HADDINGroN CORN m A RKET.—Non. 17.
Wheat. I Harley. I Data. I Pe.ise. 1 0""
First 6l, 0,1 1 35A 6,1 1 01. 6a I :116 A ! 3:' I
second :,7, 01 31< tkl 2IA (1,1 I flls 0,1 i 35 Alu
Third tc7., 0,1 ‘2,14 Oil 19. 0$ I 2IA 0,1 I 32A 0,1
1 Mere were 31'6 ire. of Whe,,t in market, ‘:9B whoreof were bold.
0 Ugsslel, —0 Grey.
V. 17A.0t -

verage

4 12t► a

DAIAEITH CORN MAR KE'EL-N0v716.
Wheat. Barley. ',ars. l'c•se. 8e3n‘,44.
First...... ~,•
61, t'd 31s tid 24, ~d 3,8 0,1 3'• Od
,zecood ls Od t7s ed s Od :15 Od 35. Od
Third . 416 Od ' Wg ud Iss Od --! Od ....; Od

CRAWFORD AND O'CONNELL.

itti WILLIAM SHARMAN CRAWFORD, ESQ.
London, I 8:h Nov., 1837.
Sir—l am much inclined to think .111,..1 t!!n I conceded to
you purity of intention, I gave a stronger proof of zn; geod
r.atorc than of my sagacity—nt all events I am now convinced
that in point of justice to the Irish public I cannot repeat the
admission without at least depriving you of the praise of com-
mon sense.
The matter between us stands precisely thus: —ln sit mor-
tal letters you. accused me of having betrayed the Irish peo-
ple in
.consideration of having obtained from Government the
patronage of Ireland.
You shifted, it is true, and varied your phraseology---fur
you have a meat melancholy superabundance of words. But
the substance of your charge was as I have stated i'. You
say indeed that there was no compact re a/Wel—whatever that
means—yet you state that the compact. exists—and what, in
the name of wonder, do I or the public care whether it was
recorded, as -you call it, or not ? The fact of its existence is
asserted, or, what is worse, insinuated, by you in your letters
at least fifty times.
I see, indeed, by your last letter that you shrink from .the
direct charge. But I understood it as a direct charge, so did
the Irish public, who repudiated it accordingly. So did
Tait's Magazine, and other shrewd writers for the patriotic
Press in Scotland, who did not know how unfounded it was.
In plain truth, the only loophole you have to creep out of the
calumny is the puzzle created by the vagueness of your own
vocabulary. _ _

This being the state of ficts—you having distinctly charged
me with selling the country's cause for patronage—l simply
hefted you to the proof—/ defied you to name one single case
—one single appointment made in Ireland at my instance.
What is your answer.? Have,you named one single ease-
have you specified One single_ appointment? No, Sir; you
did net—you could not specify either the one or the other.
Your excuse—your very indecent excuse, is—that • you arc
totally ignorant on the subject. You, with whining simplicity,
ask—lf I or the Government did not betray the secret how
were you to find it out ? You add with maiden modesty—
these are your very words—" Am I to pry into the private
communications which may have occurred between you and her
Majesty's Government? If 1 could do this I would not act
such a contemptible part."
You thus emphatically acknowledge, because you seek to
-excuse, your total ignorance upon the subject matter of your
calumnious charge against me. You more than admit—you
demonstrate your total want of proof of that charge.
Why, are you so devoid of common sense as not to perceive
that, instead of giving a reason for making the charge, you give
the most decisive reason why you should not have made the
charge at all—namely, that you are totally ignorant of the
matter, and have no proofs whatsoever to sustain it.
You say, indeed, that you would not act so contemptible a
part as to seek for such proofs. Sir, lam sorry to be com-
pelled to say that there 13 still a more contemptible part—
that is, rashly and falsely to accuse a public man of having
betrayed the public cause, and especially a man who had
offered you no offence—had done you no injury—who left you
in the sweet repose of your own virtue and self-gratulations,
and who, on the contrary, had many a time and oft, during
your modern and brief career of agitation, lauded you—heaven
forgive him—almost to the extent of your own exuberant no-
tions of your merits.
You have, however, discovered one mode of escape. It is
really pitiful. You refer to my letter to Lord Duncannon as
proving your charge. Do you recollect what that charge is ?
In that letter, written three years ago, I, as a public man, point
out individuals whose enmity to the Irish peop'e called fcr
their dismissal from office by any Government friendly to that
people; and, as a public man, I named individuals whose per-
sonal merits and whose identity of feeling with the Irish people
required from any Government friendly to that people to
place them in office, and in sober sadness this letter is adduced
as a proof that I had obtained, by compact with the Govern-
ment, the patronage of Ireland, and had thereupon betrayed
the cause of that country ! 1!
You arc, indeed, a poor reasoner. Let me just furnish an-
other specimen of your logic.
You allege that my public letter is my compact with the
Government.
You afterwards say that my letter is recorded against me.
But vou bad before said that " no compact was ever re-
corded between 771 C and the Government."
How I thank you for that good word "recorded." It
bath in it sweet music.
And now I prepare to take my leave of you for ever.
Write one thousand and one letters against me. You have
dispensed me with answering or even reading them. Write
away.
• But, before we part, allow me to bestow on you my unli-
mtted'compassion and generous forgiveness.
Let me superadd one parting word of advice. It will be
well if you follow it strictly :
Never again make an atrocious charge against any man,
though ha be a friend, without knosying something of the
matter or having some proof.
It onlyremains
T,‘areb
thattee
well—and
Iconclude—
iif
for
ever,
Oh then—for ever—fare thee well."
May you live a thousand years !
Your humble servant,
DANIEL O'CONNELL.