The Sun.
London, England, 1830-06-21 00:00:00

LONDON, MONDAY_ EVENING, JUNE 24,i 1030.

This day Vial publisheil, in Bvn., price 14s. boards,

'RAVELS in RUSSIA and ; a RESI.•
DENCE at ST. PETEISBURGH and ODESSA
in the year 182771829 ; intended to give some Account-4.
Russia us it is, and' not as it is reprefentell to be, &r., Sie'i

By EDWARD MORTON, M.B ,
Member of Trinity College, CaMbridge, &c.,
Printed for Longm3n, Rees; gime; Brown, and Green.

Of whom may be 113(1,

A SPINSTER'S TOUR in FRANCE, the STATE
of GENOA, tcc., during the year 1827. In 12ino
10s. 6,1. boards.

This day was published, price 7s. Gd., Vol. VIII. Part!. of
SYSTEM of UNIVERSAL GEO-
GRAPHY.

By M. MALTE BRUN, -
Editor of the " Annales des Voyages."
This Part contains the Geography of Spain, Portugal;
and part of France. The work is now finished in the
original ; but in order to render it a more complete System
of Gecgraphy for the English reader, large additions will
be made to the description of Great Britain, which is now
in progress, and will be published in a few months.

" We think the translators of 111. Malta Brun's Geo-
graphy have done good service to the public, by rendering
si valnable a work accessib!e to the English reader."—
Edinburgh Review, No. 97.

‘! Infinitely euperior to any thing of its class whltb 114,1
silerc.appearetV—,Literary Gazettertfo:,rog:-
Printed for Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, and Green,
London ; and Adam Black, Edinburgh.

AFFAIRS OF THE EAST INDIA COMPANY.
This day was published in Svo., Part V. (being House
of Commons' Fourth Report) of

NFINUTES of EVIDENCE taken before
—VA the SELECT COMMITTEES of both HOUSES
Of PARLIAMENT appointed to Inquire into the Ea.t
India Company's Affairs, and the Trade between Great
Britain the East Indies and China.

Printed for Parbury, Allen, and Co., Leadenhall .street ;
and J. M. Richardson, Cornhill.
Of whom may be had,
Part I. HOUSE OF LORDS' FIRST REPORT,
price is. W.
Part 11. HOUSE of COMMONS' FIRST REPORT,
price 4s. 6d.

Part 111. HOUSE of COMMONS' SECOND RE-
PORT, price 45., and
Part IV. HOUSE of COMMONS' THIRD REPORT,
price 3s.

LAW INTELLIGENCE.

COURT OF KING'S BENCH, JUNE 19.
THE KING V. THE INHABITANTS OF BARNES.

This was an appeal, by the proprietors of Ham-
mersmith-bridge, against .a rate". made on their tolls
in respect of property occupied by them in the
parish of Barnes. The Justices at sessions con-
firmed the rate, subject to the opinion of this Court
'on a case.

It appeared that-by the Act of the sth- Geb. IV.
c. 112, the appellants were ent;bled to erect a sus-
pension bridge over the- Thames at Hammersmith,
to make roads and to erect.to3l-gates
.tte either or
bOth endS of the bridge, and to.receiVe- tolls. - They
had purchased two pieces of land from different
persons on the Barnes side, for the purposes of a
pier, and part of. the road; and in respect of that
land the *rate in goestion was made. The preoed-
ino occupiers of -the..land had paid rates in respect
of it but the appellants contended; that as the ad-
vantages from the toll were derived entirely from
the gate at the Hammersmith side, it was there only
that they ought to be rated. The bridge was one-
lalf in the parish of Barnes, and the, other half. in
Atotika-rish of Hammersmith, but the company had
,tough •proper to establisb a toll at.the Hammer-
-stn4„endi,where
toll was taken.

Mr. TnEitGER was heard in support of the aR
peal. Mr. ALDERSON was on the other side, but
the Court did not, think it necessary to hear hin,.
Order of sessions confirmed.

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, JUNE 19.
IVILLIAMS V. PAUL.

This was an action brought by the plaintiff to re-
cover the price of some cows sold to the defendant.
The cows were partly bargained for on a Saturday,
and on the following day the contrct was completed,
and the cows sent -home to the-defendant. The de-
fence was, that the contract have taken place on a
Sunday, it was void under the 29th Charles IL,
and therefore the plaintiff could not recover. The
cause was tried before Mr. Justice BAYLEY on the
home circuit,, and the Jury, under his Lordship's
direction, found a verdict for. the plaintiff, subject
to the opinion -of .the Court above on the point of
law.

Mr. Seijeant ANDREWS, in a former term, ob-
tained a rule to shew cauQe why the verdict should
not be set aside, and a neOsuit entered.

Mr. Serjeant BOMPAS now showed cause against
the rule, and contended that the verdict was right.
In the first place, the contract had taken place on a
Saturday, although the beasts were chosen and de-
livered on the Sunday ; and i❑ the next place, the
defendant not having rejected the beasts and sent
them back on the Monday, must be taken either to
have ratified the former contract, or to have entered
into a fresh one, which was implied from his keep-
ing the cattle in his possession.
Their Lordships discharged the rule.

BOARD OF EXCISE COURT, JUNE 19.
Air. Charles Clayton, late landlord of the Royal
George, Lower-road, Islington, appeared to an in-
formation charging him, with having beer-colouring
in his possession, by which he incurred a penalty
of 200/.

The information contained eight counts, charging
adulteration, preparing ingredients for adulteration,
&c.

The CHIEF COMMISSIONER (Colonel Campbell)
said the offence had been clearly proved, but in con-
sideration of the situation of the defendant, the
Court mitigated thexenaltv of 2001. to 25/.