The Sun.
London, England, 1839-07-30 00:00:00

LONDON 11E5 SD T, IJULX. 30, 1839

s-cald and third que.!itit2.,
! bbsbed a decline on the April sales of lid tti Id oil fine
quality.end from 4d to 6d on all de-
scriptions,93l 03 ittie lots of the first quality ware afterwards
pat Up for re-sale at 73 91, and second quality at 6s 2d,
but found few huyers at those rates
,
5s a 231 lOs for mid date..
Ott.s.—Southern at 24/ &i. a tit Ws ter good, and 231
931 15; ki` 5 &eln(1, and 831 for inf.:rier quality. Lin.
seed mil at 25s 6d.
'
tiPICES —To-day the public sales consisted of 475
chests Cassia Lignea, 322 bags Bourbon Cloves, 11 pito
Mace, and 35 ptcgs Nittmtes ; the Cassia Lignia wes
principally sold at rather better
prices, middling fetched 60s
to 60s tld, mouldy 54-i 61, beetle stained 54s 61 to 553;
the Cloves went at Is Id to Is 21 for middling dark ; the
Mace sold at 4s 3d to 6s, and the Nutmegs were partly
sold, good brown at :as ad to as Ud, nod detiOr 4s tid to
43 I Id per lb,

-
~. The. §d'e64l flaA
THE
(THIS EVENING.)
LONDON GAZETTE.
jA,MhS'S PAtAtt, JULY 12.
3 tnd4:ll tilie of the Ladies a the Bedchamber to her Majesty.
N'2il pleased to appoint the Countess o:

OFFICE OF ORDNANCE, JULY 27.
Royal Regiment of Artillery—Second Captain G. Charle-
ton, to be Captain, vice Cookson, deceased, May 20 ; First.
Lieut. J. Gore to be Second Captain, vice Charleton; Second
Lieutenant A. H. Graham to be First Lieutenant vice Gore,
July 3.

Alir
lifd RA Kntm.—The dates of the promotion of the under-
mentioned officers of the Royal Regiment of Artillery art-
altered as follows, viz.:—Second Captain R. Luard, May 20;
Second Captain H. G. Teesdale, May 23; First Lieutenant
E. W. Rodwell, May 20; First Lieutenant S. D. Broughton,
May 23.

Commission by the Lord Lieutenant of Brecon.
Hugh Price, Esq., to be Deputy Lieutenant, July 26.

DECLARATION OF INSOLVENCY.
JOHN WILSON, spring-kniP manufacturer, Sheffield.
BA N Kit tj PTS.
ALFRED COOK TUCKER, linen draper, Burnham.
market, Norfolk, to surrender August 9, at half-past one, ant
.71eptember 10, at eleven, at the Court of Bankruptcy. Can.
Ilan, Finsbury-square, official assignee; Style Aldermanbury.
WILLIAM JAMES, linen draper, Southampton, August
10 and September 10, at twelve, at the Court of Bankruptcy.
Graham, Ilasinghall-street, official assignee; Jones and Son,
Sise-lane

1 DINE, builder,ev
e W
h rti n
e London
b eTavern
Dorset,i,
Poole. Aug.
and at
Edward and Charles Castleman, Wimboene ; Stephens.
sOSelip. 0. a, eleven, ln Nt
Doughty-street, London.
GEORGE LEE, Woolstapler, York, Aug. 5, and Sept.
10, at twelve, at the Court-house, Leeds. . Wilson, Southamp-
ton-street, Bloomsbury-square, London ; Payne, Eddison,
and Ford, Leeds.
EDWARD INGLEDEW, machine-maker, Gainsborough.
Lincolnshire, Aug. 13, and Sept. 10, at twelve, at the Black"
Head Inn, Gainsborough. Hale, Boys, and Austen, Ely-place,
Holborn, London ; Mason and Collinson. Doncaster..
JOHN THREI4FALL and THOMAS THRELFALL,
merchants, Manchester, Aug. 13, Sept. 10, at ten, at the Corn-
missioners'-rooms, Manchester. Johnson, Son, and Weatherall.
Temple, London; Hitchcock, Manchester.
JAMES WILDE and PETER WILDE, silk-manufac-
ture...s, Manchester, Aug. 13, and Sept. 10, at eleven, at the
Commissioners'-rooms, Manchester. Johnson, Son, and
Weatherall, Temple, London; Bagshaw and Stevenson, Man-
chester.
WILLIAM HENRY JONES, printer. Manchester, Aug.
13 and Sept. 10, at the Commissioner's Rooms, Manchester.
Kay, Barlow, and Aston, Manchester.
JA t:ES COULBURN, .tailor and draper, Manchester.
Aug. 13, and Sept. 10, at the Commissioner's Rooms, Man-
chester. Milne, Parry, Milne, and Morris, Temple, London ;
Weston, Cross-street, Manchester.
MARK MARKS and SAMUEL BARNETT, tailors.
Liverpool, Aug. 9, and Sept. 10, at one, at the Clarendon
Rooms, Liberpool. Chester, Staple Inn, London; Davenport
and Collier, Commmercial-court, Lord-street, Liverpool.
HENRY BATES, miller, East Peckham, Aug. 12, at ten,
and Sept. ten, at eleVen, et the Court of Bankruptcy. Clark,
New Broad.street-court, New 131 oad-street, official assignee;
Selby. Norton, and Selby, Town Mailing, Kent.
.WILLIAM BUDDLE, sen., and WILLIAM BUDDLE,
jun., builders, Warwick, Aug. 16, at one; and Sept. 10, at
three, at the Lansdowne Hotel, Leamington-priors. Newton
and Ensor, South-sqare, Gray's-inn; Heath, Warwick.
JOHN ATKINSON, victualler, Salford, Lancashire, Aug.
12, and Sept. 10, at ten, at the Commissioners'-rooms, Man-
chester. Appleby, King's-road, Bedford-row ; Oliver, St.
James's-square, Manchester.
WILLIAM COOKE STAFFORD, printer, Doncaster,
Aug. 6 and Sept. 10, at eleven, at the Guildhall, Doncaster.
Lever, Bedford-row, London ; Campion, Doncaster.
JAMES FINLINSON, grocer, Leeds, August 5 and Sept.
10, at ten, at the Court-house, Leeds. Atkinson, Dibb,
and Holland, Leeds ; Hawkins, Bicxhara, and Stocker, Lin-
coln's Inn.

PARTNERSHIPS DISSOLVED.

D. Fraser,_ and A. Fraser, surgeons, Pentonville.—T.

Hooper and W. P. Moxon, potatoe-salesmen, Beal's-wharf,
Southwark.—T. Gripper and J. P. Prangley, attorneys, Hert-
ford.—S. Hackett and W. Hackett, whitesmiths, Temple-bar,
Middlesex.—N. P. Leigh and R. Hazard, hotel-keepers, Bris-
tol.—D. Sparks and J. J. Ireland, surgeons, Cirencester, Glou-
cester.—F. Page and H Wing, plasterers, Southampton.—T.
Logan and B. W. Jackson, manufacturers, Manchester.—R.
Edmonds, H. Warland, anti- T. T. Fawcett, silk-manufacturers,
Macclesfield.—J. M. I4ouston and W. Thomas, shawl ware-
houseman, St. Paul's Church-yard, London.—J. Overall and
S. Yates, leather.dressers, White's gronnd, Bermondsey.—
T. Hutchinson, T. Dewsnup, and R. Mawdesley, jun., fustian-
shearers, Collyhurst, Manchester—A. H. Boswall, and H.
Cotes, surgeons, Wiveliscornbe, Somerset—B. Fisher and T.
Hood, general ironmongers, Walsall, Stafford—J. Tate and 11.
Haines, cheesemongers, Oxford- street, Middlesex.
CO U.

af t It cbrutiri7. .
......,.................r.: U 8
..
RSE OF EXCHANGE,-TIIIS DAY.)
48
Atotsterd,ra . ........... C.F. 12 :40 1.1,r-ta:..r
30 130
O.tte, at vight ............. ... 12 21,2 I.c,;:torn
2.5 75
" 3l
Antwerp... .......... .. ....... 12 4 ; Nf');
47
.. 40
A1t0na..... 1132 126 ; Vtiet
Paris,
i ..... ... ........... 13 1314 'Naples
per or,. 120
1., da;,,' eight..., 'l5 3- 'Y .
Dir.,.. ..... ...._ J ; .t..er.. .. .., • ..... ........ 3 Ms. 25 tis ' Lisp,r)
hlAltarsetlle,. .. ............... 25 1,5 loyur:o
9.7
... .
Bourtleaux ................... 65 I lite Jxneiro
27
Frankfurt on Maine, ELM. 151 ,-, Bahin
Berlin ........
I.'eterstfifigh, ruble... 3 II 103, Such( f. Ayrei
46X.. ...,...
...... 1, 0 INEW Pr .
4h
Vtento:, effective fi„3 AL 10 5 l'hil..tdephla
N per OZ
Pr i,..at!........itt to ...... .to 6 ',incl., of BULLIO.4, 0 0
Ida:rid. id......, l!1
37i, earttoul (4°l's' cein....73 Is 0
C:sliz..„ ..... ................... 3•7', i'meigu Gold,
in
"r"
.(1 il
0
tlirr,ll3 .... ............. .. :,6,4 New Dol'l''''s .... .....
il 4 1034
eit.nt4 .... ........ .., ..... ;114 New Dollars 0 5 e•;,
''''4lll'.
........................... N 316 Silver in Barn
'.
'4 vo• y k2l days' night ...

M PER CAL PA la MENT.

(THIS EVENING.)

HO USE or LORDS.
Thc_'. Lord CHANCELLOR took his seat on the Wool-
sack at Five o'Clock.
A wessage front the House of Commons brought up
tic
Dtvechntism
meats agreed to.
small Courts
ratusillapi,ebwtist
hCtluerirt
LBiolrl
d;sitlhipe,sNamenc.inirdk..

A message from the House of Commons, brought
up by Mr. O'Connell and others, prayed that their
Lorthhips would be pleased to convey to that House
e copy of the Report of the Select Committee of their
Lordships on the state of crime in Ireland.
Upon the motion of Earl of SHAFTESBURY the
Message was agreed to.
The Messengers were then called in, and the copy
of the Report was delivered to Mr. O'Connell at the bar.
Upon the motion of Lord FALKLAND the Turn-
pike '1
oily Reduction Bill was read a second time.
The Bishop of GLOUCESTER presented a peti-
tion from the clergy of a place in Norfolk, against the
Church Discipline Bill.
Upon the motion of Lord WHARNCLIFFE, the
Courts for Counties Bill was read a second time.
INLAND WAREHOUSING BILL.

Lord LYNDHURST presented a petition from the
Loudon Dock Company, against the Inland Warehous-
ing Bill. The petitioners stated that they laic out
3,900,000/. upon warehouses under an Act of Parlia-
ment ; and that they would be deeply affected by the
present Bill passing into a law. They prayed that they
might be heard by Counsel at the bar against it,
and that it might not pass into a law. The
Noble and Learned Lord did not think it ne-
cessary to press the prayer that they should
be heard at the bar, as he did not think their Lord-
ships would feel themselvesjustified in passing the Bill
at this late period of the Session. The Noble and
Learned Lord also presented a petition to the sank
effect from the Corporation of the East and West India
Dock Company.
Lord STKANGFORD presented a petition f; m
the Hull Dock Company to the same effect.
Lord MELBOURNE moved that the order of the
day be discharged, for the second reading of the Ireland
Warehousing Bill to-day, and gave notice that he should
move the second reading on Monday next.
NEW HOUSES OP PARLIAMENT.
Lord DUNCANNON said, that he had been asked
a question the other night relative to a person who had
presented a petition to both Houses of Parliament with
respect to the stone with which the Houses of
Parliament were to he built. A Commission
consisting of Air. Barry and others, was appointed on
the subject of the stone to be had, made their report
before the petitions to which he had alluded were pre-
sented. The representations of the petitioner were
referred to Mr. Baring and other persons, and he now
laid on the table copies of correspondence between him-
self and those other persons upon the question.
The Marquis of LONDONDERRY understood
there were details respecting the petitioners' house which
he was not aware had been laid before those gentlemen.
In answer to a question from Lord Charleville,
Lord DUNCANNON s id he should make in-
quiries respecting the medical certificates of prisoners
who had been confined in ir,o!s in Ireland.

11410193
on this edeasfain to correct a mistake which seemed
t.
have gone abroad. lie was represented to hay
said -that if he did not bring forward thi
motion this Session, he should do it next Set
sion. He had vever made such a statement
This was just a mode of garnishing the notice bool
which he had newer doubted either in this House or it
tho other. •
Lord LYNDIIUItST had never seen it done i
this House.
Lord priOUG HAM had rice!) it in this How, bu
certainly not so frequent as elsewhere. What he di,
say was, that if he found the debate on Tuesday did net
go sufficiently into the subket, he would then give
their Lordships Ca opportunity of again discussing h
and supplying the defect next Session.--( Hear, beer.)
The Marquis of NORM ANBY hoped the Noble
and Learned Lord would give notice of the resolutior
he meant to propose. He understood the Noble and
Learned Lord a motion would relate to forty or fifi3
pages of evidence ; but he (the Marquis of Nnrinanby;
might perhaps feel it necessary to make some genera•
observations on the state of the country as arising out
of the proof brought before that Committee.—(Hear.;
His opinion was that any general discussion on the sub-
ject at this period would be physically impossible, IL
lied commenced reading.the evidence, but he n ale see
slow progress with it. The Committee had sat forty-
four days ; they examined witness for five or
six hours each day ; and there was therefor,
xery nearly 1,50 hours of work, so that if any Noble
Lord wished to snake himself master of the evidence
before the discussion came on in that House, he would
not only have to employ every hour of every day, but
every hour of every night.—( Hear, hear.)
Lord BROUGHAM believed the evidence migh.
he read in a week or ten days. from beginning to end
If he were to give six months' notice of motion, nobod'
wo:Id read the evidence till about six days before the
time at which the motion was to be brouelit on. He
would lay the Resolutions before their Lordsbips on or
aefore Friday next.
The Earl of WICKLOW said the more he read
the evidence the more he was convinced that it wont,:
be impossible to do do justice to the subjeot, and the
mat injustice would be done to parties, if the Noble and
Learned Lord confined his motion to one portion of the
evidence only. It was a most extraordinary circumstance
that the draft of the Report which bad been prepare:
by a Noble Lord, and presented to the Committee,
should have been published in the papers. He thought
there had been a gross breach of confidence some-
shore, and it was a matter which ought to be in-
vestigated and enquired into. It certainly was
most extraordinary that a private draft brought dowe
by a Noble Lord should have found its way into the
public papers.
Lord H ATHERTON—And marked private 3W.
confidential."
The Earl of WICKLOW had first seen it published
in the Dublin Evening Mail, which professed to ha,:
?ad it from some private friend. •He thought great.in.
oistice would be done to the attempts of that Cone
.nittee, who lied laboured for many months in receiving
evidence, if the subjeci-ewas to be partially gone into.
Lord BROUGHAM would be the last person to de
:nothing unjust in regard to the subject itself or to
die Noble Marquis, but he thought there was abundant
for reading the evidence.
Lord MELBOURNE said their Lordshipsknew how
very difficult it was for any Member connected with
:,he Government to say anything that would havt•
the appearance of deprecating a putting off the motior.
Whether they were intended to inculpate his Nob'e
Friend, or whether they were intended to make any
dteration in the course of justice, a 4 was stated by the
Noble Lord opposite, he did think that there
.vas a -decided objection to either of the courses that
.heir Lordships bad not had time to consider the evi-
knee upon which the charges must be grounded.
Lord BROUGHAM—The resolutions, my Lords,
which I wilt propose may be adopted by your Lordships
without either of you having ever read one word o:
the evidence.—(A laugh.)
The Marquis of LONDONDERRY was not sur-
prised at the course which was now proposed to bo
taken. It was just the same course as was taken with
respect to Canada. The secret Committee had
been sitting for three or four months, and it was gene-
rally understood that they had agreed to a Report.
At all events, every one expected a Report from the
Committee. However, it was at length decided that
only the evidence should be laid on the table. The
Noble and Learned Lard then gave notice that
he intended to call the attention of the Hous
to the administration of justice—and his Noble Friend
behind him gave notice of his intention to call the at.
tention of the House to another part of the Report,
and now up gets one Lord, acid says, there is no time for
considering the evidence—in that another Noble Lord
joins him, and very likely the matter would end for the:Ses-
sion. He would not say there was any manceuvring
about this, but he must say that to him it had all the
appearance of it. It was the same course as was taken
upon the Canada question. Three months ago the
Noble Lords opposite. threatened to bring serious and
crave charges against the Noble Earl, but now the
Noble Earl complimented the Noble Viscount, and
the Noble Viscount returned the compliaient, and
so the matter ended. We dare to say that
the Noble Marquis opposite did not want to press
forward the discussion in any possible shape or way,
but surely Parliament would riot come to a close with-
alit saying whether the Noble Marquis was culpable or
not after so much preparation.
The Marquis of NORMANBYtiras not astonished
at what had fallen from the Noble Marquis, because
upon a former night he stated that he was quite ready
to come to a decision without ever having read a
word of the evidence. lie had never shorn arty
desire to shrink from the discussion, all he
wanted was, that their Lordships should read, study,
and digest the evidence before coming to any codclusioe
respecting and part of his conduct. If their Lordships
bad done so, the sooner the discussion came on the
hotter, though, at the same time, it must be remem-
bered that a great part of the evidence referred to his
conduct as far back as two or three years ago.
The Marquis of LONDONDERRY denied that
ite-htid stated that he was prepared to come. to a de-
cision without having read the evidence. It wa,
impossible for any one residing in Ireland to be without
a strong feeling on the:r minds respecting the manner in
which the Noble Marquis had compromised the Go-
vernment in that country.
Lord HATHERTON said his Hon. and Gallant
Friend was so' accustomed to diplomatic controver
that he could see nothing but manoeuvre where ever
one else saw plain sailing. Nothing could be snore
straightforward than the course pursued by every indi-
vidual in the Committee. He (Lord H.) did every
thing in his power for the purpose of shortening the
inquiry, and the same disposition was manifested on the
other side to expedite the Report.
(LEFT SITTING )