The Sun.
London, England, 1863-11-04 00:00:00

THE SUN, LONDON, WEDNESDAY EVENING, NOVEMBER 4, 1863.

Treaty of Commerce with Italy,

(From the _London Gazette.)

Thefollowingis the Treaty of Commerce and
Navigation
btween her Majesty and the King of
Italy, which was signed at Turin on the 6th of
August, 1863, and the ratifications of which were
exchanged at London on the 29th October, 1863:
In the name of the Most Holy and Indivisible Trinity.
Her Majesty the Queen of the United Kingdom of Great
Britain and Ireland, and his Majesty the King of Italy,
being de&rous of extending and facilitating the relations of
commerce between their respective dominions and subjects,
have resolved to conclude a treaty for that purpose, and
have named as their respective plenipotentiaries, that is to
say :

Her Majesty the Queen of the United Kingdom of Great
Britain and Ireland, etc., Sir James Hudson, Knight Com-
mander of the Moat Honourable Order of the Bath, her
Majesty's Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipoten-
tiary to his Majesty the King of Italy;
And hie Majesty the King of Italy, Giovanni Manna,
Senator of the Kingdom, Grand Officer of the Order of
Saints Maurice and Lazarus, Minister Secretary of State for
Agriculture, Industry, and Commerce;
Who, after having communicated to each other their re-
spective full powers, found in good and due form, have
agreed upon and concluded the following articles :
.

Art. I—There shall be between ail the dorair ions and
possessions of the two high contracting parties, reciprocal
freedom of commerce and navigation. The subjects of each
of the two contracting parties, respectively, shall have
liberty freely and securely to come, with their ships and
cargoes to all places, ports, and rivers in the dominions and
possessions of the other to which other foreigners are or
may be permitted to come, and shall, throughout the whole
extent of the dominions and possessions of the other, enjoy
the same rights, privileges, liberties, favours, immunities,
and exemptions in matters of commerce and navigation
which are or may be enjoyed by native subjects generally.
Art. 2—No other or higher duties shall be imposed on
the importation into the dominions and possessions of her
Britannic Majesty of any article the produce er manufac-
ture of the dominions and possessions of his Majesty the
King of Italy, from whatever place arriving, and no other
or higher duties shall be imposed on the importation into
the dominions and possessions of his Majesty the King of
Italy of any article the produce or manufacture of her
Britannic Majesty's dominions and possessions, from what-
ever place arriving, than are or may be payable on the like
article, the produce or manufacture of any other foreign
country ; nor shall any prohibition be maintained or im-
posed on the importation of any article the produce or ma-
nufacture of the dominions and possessions of either of the
contracting parties into the dominions and possessions of
the other, which shall not entirely extend to the importa-
tion of the like articles being the produce or manufacture
of any other country.

His Majesty the King of Italy further engages that he
will not prohibit the importation into his dominions and
possessions of any article the produce or manufacture of
the dominions and possessions of her Britannic Majesty,
from whatever place arriving.
Art. 3—No other or higher duties or charges shall be
imposed in the dominions and possessions of either of the
contracting parties, on the exportation of any article to the
dominions and possessions of the other, than such as are or
may be payable on the exportation of the like article to any
other foreign country; nor shall any prohibition be imposed
on the exportation of any article from the dominions and
possessions of either of the two contracting parties to the
dominions and possessions of the other which shall not
equally extend to the exportation of the like article to any
other country.

Art. 4—The subjects of one of the contracting parties
shall enjoy, in the dominions and possessions of the other,
equality of treatment with native subjects in all that relates
to the transit trade, and also in regard to warehousing,
bounties, facilities, and drawbacks.
Art. s—All articles which are or may be legally im-
portable into the port or dominions and possessions of her
Britannic Majesty in British vessels may likewise be im-
ported into those ports in Italian vessels without being liable
to any other or higher duties or charges, of whatever deno-
mination, than if such articles were imported in British
vessels ; and reciprocally, all articles which are or may be
legally importable into the ports of the dominions and pos-
sessions of his Majesty the King of Italy in Italian vessels
may likewise be imported into those ports in British vessels
without being liable to any other or higher duties or
charges, of whatever denomination, than if such articles
were imported in Italian vessels. Such reciprocal equality
of treatment shall take effect without distinction, whether
such articles came directly from the place of origin or from
any other place.

In the same manner there shall be perfect equality of
treatment in regard to exportation, so that the same export
duties shall be paid, and the same bounties and drawbacks
allowed, in the dominions and possessions of either of the
contracting parties, on the exportation of any article which
is or may be legally exportable therefrom, whether such ex-
portation shall take place in Italian or British vessels, and
whatever may be the place of destination, whether a port of
either of the contracting parties or of any third power.
Art• 6—No duties of tonnage, harbour, pilotage, light-
house, quarantine, or other similar or corresponding duties,
of whatever nature, or under whatever denomination, levied
in the name or for the profit of Government, public func-
tionaries, private individuals, corporations, or establish-
ments of any kind, shall be imposed in the ports of the
dominions and possessions of either country upon the vessels
of the other country which shall not equally and under the
same conditions be imposed in the like cases on national
vessels in general. Such equality of treatment shall apply
reciprocally to the respective vessels, from whatever port or
place they may arrive, and whatever may be their place of
destination.

Art. 7—ln all that regards the stationing, loading, and
unloading of vessels in the ports, basins, docks, roadsteads,
harbours, or rivers of the dominions and possessions of the
two countries, no privilege shall be granted to national ves-
sels which shall not be equally granted to vessels of the
other country ; the intention of the contracting parties
being that in this respect also the respective vessel shall be
treated on the footing of perfect equality.
Art B—The contracting parties agree that, in regard to
the coasting trade, the vessel and subjects of each contract-
ing party shall enjoy, in the dominions and possessions of
the other, the same privileges, and shall be treated in all
respects in the same manner as national vessels and native
subjects.

The provisions of this Article shall, however, as re-
spects the colonial coasting trade, be deemed to extend only
to the coasting trade of such of the colonial possessions of
her Britannic Majesty as may have petitioned or may here-
after petition her Majesty, under the provisions of the Act
relating thereto, to throw open their coasting trade to foreign
vessels.

Art. 9—All vessels which, according to British law, are
to be deemed British vessels, and all vessels which according
to Italian law are to be deemed Italian vessels, shall for the
purposes of this treaty be deemed British and Italian vessels
respectively.

Art. 10—The contracting parties agree that in all matters
relative to commerce and navigation any privilege, favour,
or immunity whatever, which either contracting party has
actually granted, or may hereafter grant, to the subjects or
citizens of any other State, shall be extended immediately
and unconditionally to the subjects or citizens of the other
contracting party, it being their intention that the trade and
navigation of each country shall be placed, in all respects,
by the other on the footing of the most favoured nation.
Art. 11—Any import duty levied advalorsm in the terri-
tories of his Majesty the King of Italy shall be calculated
on the value at the place of production or fabrication of the
object imported, with the addition of the cost of transport,
insurance, and commission necessary for the importation
into Italy, its dominions and possessions, as far as the port
of discharge.
For the levying of these duties the importer shall make a
written declaration at the Custom-house, stating the value
and description of the goods imported, with the addition
aforesaid. If the Custom-house authorities shall be of
opinion that the declared value is insufficient they shall be
at liberty to take the goods on paying to the importer the
price declared with an addition of 5 per cent.
This payment, together with the restitution of any duty
which may have been levied upon such goods, shall be
made 15 days following the declaration.
Art. 12—The subjects of each of the contracting parties
shall have, in the dominions and possonions of the other,
the same rights as native subjects in regard to trade-marks
and designs of every description{ applicable to articles of
manufacture.
Art. 13—It shall loe free for each of the contracting
parties to appoint Consuls-General, Consuls, Vice-Consuls,
and consular agents to reside in the towns and ports of the
dominier.s and possessions of the other. Such Consuls.
General, Consuls, Vice• Consuls, and consular agents) how-
e-,er, shall not enter upon their functions until after they
shall have been approved and admitted in the usual form,
by the Government to which they are ser.t. They shall
exercise whatever functions and enjoy whatever privileges,
exemptions, and immunities ar
P., or shall be granted there
to Consuls of the most favo.:(red nation.
Art. 14—The subj
conforming them ',elves
of each of the contracting parties
',elves to the laws of the country—.
l
Shall rave full liberty, with their families, to enter,
travel,
or reside in any part of the dominions and posses-
-1 sir.,ns of the other contracting party.
2. They shall be permitted to hire or possess the houses,
Manufactories, warehouses, shops, and premises which may
be necessary for them.
Or 3.
ylahneyy may carry on their commerce, either in person
4 They
or propert
or establisnme4
agents whom they may think fit to employ.
y ,
carllf not be subject, in respect of their persons
or obligations 07hether
dustry, to 0,3, respecteach
of passports, licences for residence
in respect of their commerce or in-
postsgeneral or local, nor to lin-
a_ mayd whatever, other or greater
' be imposed upon native sub-
s er vice whatever,
of the
contracting parties
compulsory
milititahe other shall be ex-
They shall be equally exempted from all judicial or militia.
cipal CULICtiVEI6 whatever, as well as from alt controirburatitionnei-,

whether pecuniary or in kind, imposed as a compensation
for personal service; and, finally, from forced loans and
military exactions or requisitions.
Art. 16—The subjects of each of the contracting parties
in the dominions and possessions of the other shall be at full
liberty to acquire, possess, and dispose of every description
of property which the lave of the country may permit any
foreigners, of whatsoever nation, to acquire and possess.
They may acquire and dispose of the same, whether by
purchase, sale, donation, exchange, marriage, testament,
succession ab tntestate, or in any other manner, under the
same conditions as are established by the laws of the coun •
try for all foreigners. Their heirs and representatives may
succeed to, and take possession of, such property, either in
person or by agents acting on their behalf, in the same
manner and in the same legal forms as subjects of the coun-
try. In the absence of heirs and representatives, the pro-
perty shall be treated in the same manner as the like pro-
perty belonging to the subjects of the country under similar
circumstances.

In none of these respects shall they pay upon the value of
such property any other or higher impost, duty, or charge
than is payable by subjects of the country. In every case
the subjects of the contracting parties shall be permitted to
export their property, or the proceeds thereof, if sold, freely
and without being subjected on such exportation to pay any
duty as foreigners, or any other or higher duties than those
to which subjects of the country are liable under similar
circumstances.

Art. 17—The dwellings, manufactories, warehouses, and
shops of the subjects of each of the contracting parties in
the dominions and possessions of the other, and all pre-
mises appertaining thereto, destined forpurposes of residence
or commerce shall be respected. If there should be occasion
to make a search of or a domiciliary visit to such dwellings
and premises, or to examine or inspect books, papers, or
accounts, such measure shall be executed only in conformity
with the legal warrant or order in writing of a tribunal, or
of the competent authority.

The subjects of each of the two contracting parties in the
dominions and possessions of the other shall have free ac-
cess to the courts of justice for the prosecution and defence
of their rights. They shall enjoy in this respect the same
rights and privileges as subjects of the country, and shall,
like them, be at liberty to employ in all causes their advo-
cates, attorneys, or agents from among the persons admitted
to the exercise of those professions according to the laws of
the country.

Art. 18—Any ship of war or merchant vessel of either of
the contracting parties which may be compelled by stress
of weather or by accident to take shelter in a port of the
other shall be at liberty to refit therein, to procure all neces-
sary stores, and to put to sea again, without paying any dues
other than such as would be payable in a similar case by a
national vessel. In case, however, the master of a merchant
vessel should be under the necessity of disposing of a part
of his merchandise in order to defray his expenses, he shall
be bound to conform to the regulations and tariffs of the
place to which he may have come.

- -
If shy ship of war er:merchant vessel of one of the con-
tracting parties ehodld run aground or be wrecked upon the
coasts of the other, such ship or vessel, and all parts there-
of, and all furniture and appurtenances belonging thereunto,
and all goods and merchandise saved therefrom, including
any which may have been cant into the sea, or the proceeds
thereof, if sold, as well as all papers found on board such
stranded or wrecked ship or vessel, shall be given up to the
owners or their agents when claimed by them. If there are
no such owners or agents on the spot, then the same shall
be delivered to the British or Italian Consul General, or
Vice-Consul in whose district the wreck or stranding may
have taken place upon being claimed by him within the
period fixed by the laws of the country; and such Consuls,
owners, or agents shall pay only the expenses incurred in
the preservation of the property, together with the salvage
or other expenses which would have been payable in the
like case of a wreck of a national vessel.
The goods and merchandise saved from the wreck shall
be exempt from all duties of Customs, unless cleared for
consumption, in which case they shall pay the same rate of
duty as if they had been imported in a national vessel.
In the case either of a vessel being driven in by stress of
weather, run aground, or wrecked, tue respective Consul-
General, Consuls, Vice• Consuls, and Consular agents shall,
if the owner or master or other agent of the owner is not
present, or is present and requires it, be authorised to inter-
pose in order to afford the necessary assistance to their fel-
low-countrymen.

Art. 19--The Consuls-General, Consuls, Vice-Consuls,
and Consular agents of each of the contracting parties re-
siding in the dominions and possessions of the other shall
receiva from the local authorities such assistance as can by
law be given to them for the recovery of deserters from the
vessels of their respective countries.

Art. 20—The present treaty of commerce and navigation,
when ratified, shall be substituted for the treaties in force
between the high contracting parties—namely, those con-
cluded on the sth of April, 1847, and the 30th of December,
1854, between Great Britain and Tuscany, and on the 29th
of April, 1845, between Great Britain and the Two Sicilies,
and on the 27th of February, 1851, and the 9th of August,
1854, between Great Britain and Sardinia, and shall remain
in force for ten years from the date of the exchange of the
ratifications, and, further,until the expiration of 12 months
attar either of the contracting parties shall have given
notice to the other of its intention to terminate the same,
each of the contracting parties being at liberty to give such
notice to the other at the expiration of the first 9 years, or
at any time afterwards.

Art. 21—The present treaty shall be ratified,and the rati-
fications shall be exhanged at London in six weeks, or sooner
if possible.

In witness whereof the respective Plenipotentiaries have
signed the same, and have affixed thereto the seal of their
arms.

Turin, Aug. 6.

JAMES HUDSON,
GIOVANNI MANNA.

LAW INTELLIGENCE, Nov, 3.

VICE-CHANCELLORS' COURTS.
(Before Vice-Chancellor Wood.)
HUTTON V. BEETON.-BEETON V. /4431IIRRAY.

His Honour this morning finally delivered judgment in
these causes. The facts which have already been reported,
are chiefly as follows :—ln the month of October, 1860, J.
G. Shipley and John Hutton were entered at Somerset
House as the sole proprietors of the Sporting Life and
Ecliiise, subject to two mortgages of Shipley's share to
M'Murray, the well-known paper-maker,who in that capa •
city became acquainted with Beeton. In February, 1861,
Shipley became bankrupt, and shortly afterwards
M'Murray, on behalf of Hutton, sold to Beeton one-
half of the above newspapers, and of his interest in the
lease of No. 149, Fleet-street, fixtures, type, &c., for
the sum of £4,325 ; and on the 19th of March following,
Hutton and Beeton were entered at Somerset House as sole
proprietors of the Sporting Life and Eclipse, subject to two
mortgages to M'Murray. Beeton's statement was that
from that time Hutton ceased to take a share in the
management of the papers, and in May follow-
ing he (Beeton) purchased for the same sum as
before the remaining moiety ; that on the papers
under his own good management, having become valuable,
Huttcn, in July, 1862, demanded from him an account of
profits, which he refused to give; and that thereupon Hut-
ton filed his bill praying for a dissolution of partnership, as
from Oct., 1862, for an account, and for the appointment of
a receiver. Hutton's case was that M'Murray had no
authority to sell his (Hutton's) share, and that he had
bought the other share from M'Murray for £1,500. Beeton
then filed his bill against M'Murray for specific perfor-
mance. M'Murray's case was that he contracted to sell the
second moiety to Hutton, and that it was that that was the
subject of the sale to Beeton.
His Honour dismissed Hutton's bill, with costs ; and as
to Beeton's, he granted a decree for specific performance as
prayed, and an account of what remained due to M'Murray
in respect of the purchase money, M'Murray to pay the
plaintiff the costs of the suit. In both causes the above to
be the decree, unless his Honour intimated to the contrary
at the sitting of the court in the term.
The Attorney-General, Mr. Bacon, Q C., Sir H. Cairns,
Q.C., Mr. Malins, Q.C., Mr. Terrell, Mr, S svanston, and
Mr, Karslake, were the counsel engaged.

ting of this court, but even there he was not free from his
tormentors.
The Lord Chief Justice—We think you have said quite
enough to entitle you to a rule nisi,

COURT OF EXCHEQUER.
(Sittings in Banco before the Lord Chief Baron, Mr. Baron
Bramwell, Mr. Baron Channell, and Mr. Baron Pigott.)
SEIZURE OF THE SHIP ALEXANDRA.-THE ATTORNEY.

GENERAL V. SILLIAN AND OTHERS.
This was an infsrmation, containing 90 counts, filed by
her Majesty's Attorney-General, with a view of obtaining
on tho part of the Crown a condemnation of the vessel, as
well as imposing penalties or imprisonment upon certain
persons concerned in the equipping, fitting out, or furnish-
ing of the ship contrary to the provisions of the Foreign
Enlistment Act. It will be remembered that after a very
protracted trial the jury found a verdict fur the defendants,
the Attorney-General tendering a bill of exceptions to the
ruling of the Lord Chief Baron, before whom the case was
tried.

£he Attorney-General (with whom were the Solicitor-
General and Mr. Thomas Jones) now applied to their lord-
ships to enlarge the time for applying to the Court for a new
trial, beyond the usual four days, in case it should happen
that the Lord Chief Baron should refuse to sign the bill of
exceptions tendered at the trial.
The Attorney-General, in addressing the Court, said--
It will be in the recAlection of your lordship that at the
trial you laid down views which you thought ought to
govern the jury as to the construction of the Foreign Enlist-
ment Act. Your Lordships did so in a manner which we
thought perfectly intelligible to all persons. There was no
difference whatever in the understanding of your Lordship's
ruling on the part of the counsel for the Crown, and we had
no reason to suppose it was otherwise as regards the counsel
for the defendants, or that it was generally understood in
any sense other than that in which we understood it. At
the end of the trial we expressed a wish to offer exceptions
to that ruling, and were told that it was not necessary at
all to stand upon the usual form. Your Lordship said, " I
will accept any bill of exceptions you choose to tender ;"
and accordingly after the verdict we wrote out the principal
points which we understood he had laid down, but his Lord-
ship said we were not bound by what passed on that occa-
sion, and that the matter could be easily settled. The case
involved a point of very great importance, and it was most
fit and desirable that exceptions should be tendered, in order
that the case might be argued before a Court of Error, and,
if necessary, before a still higher tribunal. We are most
anxious that the question should be raised and determined,
and we have no reason to doubt that the other side is equally
so, but hitherto there have been difficulties in arriving at any
form of exception which we can rely upon as certain to re-
ceive the signature of his Lordship. We sincerely hope that
these difficulties may be overcome. We are in communica-
tion with the counsel on the other side, who have in their
possession the form of exception we propose, and we trust
that an agreement in writing may be arrived at with them,
or, if that should not happen, that his Lordship, on being
applied to, will settle such a form of a bill of exceptions as
will raise the real question to be determined in a way satis-
factory to both parties and useful to the public.
The Lord Chief Baron—l think it right to state that I
see no prospect whatever of any change in the view I took
as to my duty in deciding upon the bill of exceptions. A
correspondence has passed between myself and the late
Attorney-General which probably you may have seen. You
were not present during the whole of the trial. So far from
my laying down the law, as the bill of exceptions tendered
to me assumed, I took particular pains to avoid anything; of
the kind. I had originally during the argument of Sir
Hugh Cairns at one part of the trial entertained, an impres-
siou—l called it no more—that all the expressions in the
Foreign Enlistment Act, " equipping," " fitting out," and
so on, probably meant the saute thing, and were to be re-
ferred to the verbiage of an act of Parliament, just in the
some way as the words '• ship" or " vessel," which are com-
monly used in statutes, and are no doubt intended to mean
the same thing. But the late Attorney General in his ad-
dress referred to a case in an American Court, with an
appeal to a superior Court where the decision below was
affirmed. It was, I thick, a case in which the vessel was
completely prepared in every respect, with the exception of
being armed. When I came to sum up I mentioned that
case to the jury, and commended so far as to say I adopted
it. I left it to them, and pointed out what had fallen from
the counsel as to the law on the subject, not what I consi-
dered was the law. I then finally left the question to them,
in the alternative using the very words of the act of Parlia-
ment. If you think, I said, this vessel was " armed," or
" equipped," or " fitted out," or intended to be armed," or
fitted out or equipped, your verdict must be for the Crown ;
if not, it must be tor the defendants. Now, the Attorney-
General presented to me a bill of exceptions, by which I was
said to have told the jury that the vessel must be armed,
and that if it was not armed there was no offence. I not only
did not tell the jury so, but if you read the shorthand
writer's notes of the trial I think you will say no person
c.n have any doubt that I left the question as I have just
stated it. But probably the object you have in view may
be attained by a motion without any reference to a
bill of exceptions. It is true no point was reserved at the
trial so as to give you a right of appeal in the event of the
rest of the Court concurring with me in the direction 1 gave
to the jury. But this is a matter of so much importance I
do not know whether I can pledge the whole Court in this
respect; but certainly it would be very much to be lamented,
however unanimous this Court might be, if we did not give
you what we have the power of doing—an appeal to a supe-
rior Court.

The Attorney-General—l understand you have no power
by Act of Parliament to give an opinion unless there be a
difference of opinion among your lordships,
The Lord Chief Baron.—That is not so. We 'have the
power of granting an appeal, and I must say, as far as I am
concerned, however unanimous and strong the Court may
be in point of law, if you wish an appeal, you will certainly
have my voice in favour of granting it.
Baron Bramwell—l understand the difficulty to be that
the Common Law Procedure Act does not apply to a case of
this kind. You are apprehensive that the Lord Chief Baron
will decline to sign the bill of exceptions in the form in
which you have tendered it, and if you move for a now trial
on the ground that he directed the jury wrongly, and he
reports that he did not so direct them, we could not grant a
rule for a new trial under these circumstances. That is the
sort of difficulty in which you aro placed.
The Attorney-General—We have merely on the bill of
exceptions adopted the litera scripts which we have here. I
am not aware that even a learned judge is able to interpret
his own words on an application for a new trial in a sense
different from that which they really mean.
Baron Bramwell—We ought not to depart from the ordi-
nary practice of taking the judge's interpretation of the
words in which he directed the jury.
The Lard Chief Baron—l will read the shorthand
writer's notes as to what I left to the jury :—" The ques-
tion is," I said, "was there any intention in the port of
Liverpool or any other port that the ship should be in the
language of the Act of Parliament, equipped, fitted out, or
armed with the object of taking part in any contest." I also
said, "If you think that the object was to equip, furnish,
fit out, or arm that vessel at Liverpool, then there is suffi-
cient matter for your consideration ; but if you think the
object really was to build a vessel in obedience to orders,
and in compliance with a contract, leaving it to those who
brought it to make what use they thought fit of it, then it
appears to me that the Foreign Enlistment Act has not in
any degree been broken. I leave you to find that by your
verdict." _ _

The Attorney- General—Your Lordship said that you
would not bind the Attorney-General to what passed on
that occasion—that he could not alter the thing then. The
version which the then Attorney-General had given at the
time of the Lord Chief Baron's ruling was not contradicted.
The Lord Chief Baron—The question now is, what course
you can take consistent with the views of the Court. If
you wish to move for a new trial on the ground that the
jury ought net to have found the verdict that they have,
the Court will entertain that application; but if you mean
to reserve to yourself the power of marling a motion for a
new trial on a point of law, having tendered a bill of excep-
tions containing that or some other point, I do not think
the Court would consent to that course.
The Attorney-General—My application is now simply
to have the time for moving for a new dial enlarged, so
thanboth sides may agree as to what your Lwrdship said to
the jury as to the interpretation of the statute. We believe
the finding of the jury was following upon your intt.nre-
tation of the statute.
The Lord Chief Baron—Nothing of the kind,
The Attorney-General—Then, both sides are under a
misapprehension, and it is their common wish to raise the
point by a bill of exceptions if possible. We ask you to
enlarge the time beyond the four days ; and if, in the
meantime, we do not get your Lordship's signature to the
bill of exceptions, I will move for a new trial.
Baron Bramwell—We have no power in the Act to allow
more than four days except by your making the motion for
a new tidal and then adjourning it, but that would not answer
your purpose.
The Attorney-General said that, as this was only the se-
cond day allowed for moving, by the fourth day they would
have considered whether the case could be brought within
the Common Laws
rocedure Act, and mention the case
again, or take further steps in the matter.

Fall benefit of reduced duty obtai'ned by pur-
chasing Hottdraan's pure Tea; very choice at :18' 4d-fined
is and
the
4s. " High Standard '" at 4s. 4d. (formerly 4s. Bd.),
strongest and most delicionto imported. Agents in eve:Y
town supply it in packets.
EADYERTISEMENT.]-110110,073y'S Pills.--Nervous Dis-
orders.—Derangement of the nervous system totally upsets
all human comfort, and unless speedily rectified, leads tand
o
serloos indisposition. The purifying. alterative,
strengthening qualities of these well-known pills render
them remarkably efficacious in those various and painful
affections which attack the nerves, as neuralgia, hysterics,
and habitual low spirits. Holloway's pills cool the body,
clean the tongue, regulate the liver, and so strengthen the
stomach and bowels that they are enabled to perform their
offices regularly and steadily. This
anmednoys personsicine never c
oases
any s
any fain, or in the slightest degree
most relaxed, delicate, and irritable habits. Holloway's
small , tasteless, and easily swallowed when an
pills are
ill could not,
1 ordinary 51zed p