The Sun.
London, England, 1837-11-21 00:00:00

PRICE OF RAW FAT, per stone of 811,.
Price of Tallow (as stated loy the Tallow Melters) 2a. Nil.

PRICE OF TALLOW,
Town Tallow 4ss 6d.
Yellow Russia
White —s. Od.
Snap Ditto —s Od.
Melting Stuff
Ditto Rough 2.s. Id.

SOAP, Stc. per 1 121 b.
Yellow Soap
Mottled —s. od
Curd s
Groves IS,.
Good Dregs 5.. Od

PRICE OF CANDLES.
The price of good Store Candles ir. the Retail Shops is as fellows :
Candloo, per dozen, 7s. 6.1. ; inferior, Gs. 6d.—Moulds, ge.
Sixpence per dozen discount for ca.i.

COAL MAR
BArtair's

Per Ton

KEr.— Nov. 20

Per lon. s. d.
Walls End Riddell's

Bensham

Walla Hetten 21 3
Walls End Haag ell

`..7arr's Hartley 2l 0
Dean's Primrose lii 9

Walls End Hetten 24 3

Russell's High Main 2O 3
Townley 9l 0
l'anfleld 23 0
.._ ,

Walls End Larniston !4 a
Walls End Stewart's

West flartley
Willington 23 3
Walls End Bell and Brown ....23 3
Walls End Bewicke and Co— 23 6
Walls End Chirton 2O 0
Walls End Gosforth
Walls End Heaton Z3 6
Walls End Hilda 23 u
Walls End llotspur
Walls End Killineworth
Walls End Northumberland 22 9
Ships arrived sinset

Walls End Hartlepool 24 3
Walls End Adelaide = 9
Walls End Barrington ...
Walls End Gordon
. 93 3
-

WaIR En South Durham 23 8
Walls End Tees 44 0
Walls Eni West Tees 4l 9
Walls End Staveley Main 9l 4
Walls End Elgin 22 0
Blythe l9 0
Cowpea 21 9

last market-day. 4

SPIRIT OF THE PUBLIC JOURNALS.

The first debate of the first Parliament of our new Queen
was distinguished last night by, we must call it, an ungracious
disturbance of the unanimity that would have prevailed, had
not Mr. Wakley thought it necessary to divide the House upon
three amendments, moved by himself, and seconded by Sir
William Molesworth. Mr. Wakley could not failto perceive,
from the manner in which his amendments were
es received by
the great body of Reformers, that he had adopted a very.qu-
tionable course ; aad at one time it was thought that—in de-
ference to the feeling of many who arc as keenly alive as him-
self to the necessity for extending the suffrage, and more espe-
cially for protecting voters, though they disapproved of the
moment he had chosen for introducing the subject to the
House—he would have withdrawn his amendments. That he
did not adopt this prudent course was mainly owing
.to Sir
Robert Peel, who, after reading a lecture on the propriety of
excluding from the Speech from the Throne at all times, but
especially under the present peculiar circumstances, every topic
which could occasion diversity of opinion, taunted the Hon.
Member for Finsbury into a worse than useless perseverance,
by telling him that it would be a species of desertion of liis
own principles were he to yield to the suggestion of his
friends. Lord John Russell, Mr. Hume, Mr. Grote, and
Mr. Ward, in turn had enforced the inconvenience and unfit-
ness of taking the sense of the House upon the wide ques-
tions embraced by the amendments (Vote by Ballot, Extension
of Suffrage, and shortening the duration of Parliaments), but
without avail, although it was evident that they could never
be brought forward under greater disadvantages. The Tory
object was thus accomplished, and on the very earliest oppor-
tunity it has thus been made to appear to the country as if
grounds of dissension exist between Ministers and their Radi-
eal.supporters. Mr. Wakley ought to have seen through this
artifice, more especially as Sir Robert Peel, who urged the
course, showed clearly in the previous part of his speech that
if the topics of the amendment had been of much less conse-
quence, it would have been impolitic to have called upon the
House on the sudden to give any decided pledge regarding
them. Mr. Wakley has hitherto shown some tact in the