The Sun.
London, England, 1806-03-06 00:00:00

DISEASES OF HORSES

ffiHE following,prealent Diseases are safely and
expeditibusly cured by BLAIN L's ILO RSE ALEDI.
CINES:
_ .

Colds Gripes • Spavins
Cough Hidebound Spients
Curb . Jaundice Sellenders
Cracks (Heel) Larnenesses' Snrteirs -
Cankered Foot M\Alenders Tnrushes
Farey .Moult,ng Worms
Fistulous Sores Pole EYil Yellows;
Glanders. Quieter &c.
Grease Ring. bone
These Medicines are prepared by Mr. Bhine,
street, Oxford-street ; and sod wholesale and retail by -I'.
Boosey, No. 4, Old .Broad-street, Exchange, where Mr. -
Blaine attends every Wednesday, tram Eleven to 0 ne o' Clock.
Also sold by Mes Sr. 6arclay and Son, Fleet-market; Bankt;
132, St. tvlartin's-lane ; Bolton, Royal Exchange;- Hollier;
Pall-Mall ; Crisp, Coekspur-street ; fluddlestone and Co.
Dublin ; and at No. 86,, South Bridge, Edinburgh.
UPI ,HELTMATISINISI Palsies, and Gouty Affec:.;
tions, with their usual concomitants, Spasms, or fly-
ing- Pains, Flatulency; Indigestion, and general Debility;
originating in whatever source, are relieved and frequently
cured by WHITEHEAD's ESSENCE of MUSTARD
'PILLS, after every other Nleans had tailed.- . .
The Fluid Essence of Mtistard, •used with tine Pills in
those Complaints where necessary, is -perhaps the most ac.,
tive, penetrating, and et-Kauai Remedy in the Vy'urid, gene-
rally curing the severest Sprains and Bruises.in less than half
the time usually taken by any other Liniment or Embroca-
tion ; 'and, if used immediately after any accident, it pre-
vents the part turning . black. Chilblains it. prevents from
breaking, and instantly removes their tormenting itching.
Prepared only, and sold by R. j 111 N STO N, Apothecary,
is, Greek-street, Soho, London, at 2s, 9d. each Box or
Bottle ; and by every Medicine Vender in the United King-
dom. •
_ _

"--c* The Genuine has a black ink Stamp; with the Name
of It. lohniton inserted Unit.

PALM SOAP IN THE GREATEST PERFECTION.
Q BERRY having made great Improvements in his
0. well-known PALM -SOAP, recommends it with re-
newed confidence to the Nobility and Gentry ; prepared from
that sweet fragrant article, Palm Oil, the ,pleasantness of
the Perfume; and delicacv of its use, has merited the atten-
tion 'and patronage of many of the first Families, and is
esteemed a valuable discovery for softening, cleaning, bracing,
and preserving the Skin from the heat of the sun ; and is
also thund an excellent defence againit cold winds and sharp
frosty air.
'Sold in Squares and Balls, is. each, with-the words " Sa-
muel Berry" on the wrapper. The Proprietor recommends
it as the best Soap fqr shaving, producing a fine soft lather,
proper for tender Faces, in round Cakes, is. each. Prepared
and*sold by S, Berry, Wholesale Perfumer, No. 0, Creek-,
-street, Soho ; and, by his appointment, at the principal Per:
fathers in London and dilthrent Towns in tke three King-
doms.

•
,TE tecorilmend,..from trial arid conviaion, tho
V V good E *Cis of SP! LSBUR Y's PAT ENT ANTl-
scalbwric DROPS, in the Spring, to -the Scorbutic,
Gouty, and Rheumatic, Habits, as a Medicine palatable, re-
moving all Obstru#ions of the Stomach, promoting the Cir-
culation of theßile, and destroying all Nervous Complaints
occasioned by the tender irritability of this Organ. • •
. In Eruptive and.Scropnulous .Cases, more distressing trom
the pain the mind receives in Young People, we 611,41 not
hesitate to speak decidedly, when we have given public
proofs, that the honour of relieving this anxiety has•b:en our
own in many lamentable Cases. lt is necessary. to ask for
-the Genuine Patent Medicine, with the King's Duty printed
in Black Ink instead of Red I ok.

Sold at the Dispensary, No. 15, Soho=square, in BottleS
of ss. 6d. ios. and 1.1. 2s. Duty included.

WELCH's FEMALE PILLS;

-For the G rcen Sickness and other Disorders incident to young
Females.

THE following Instancy of their un;,-.ommon
cae y is worthy the attention of the Afilideci. •
To Mrs. K EARS LE Y, Fleet. street; London.

MADAM.

1 am the unfortunate Daughter of an Officer in the Army;
who fell in his Country's Cause, by Which means his Family
are left in a situation that it is necessary- each should endea'
your to provide•for themselves, which, from indisposition;
1 was entirely incapacitated from, till an intimate friend re-
commended your pi LLS, which • have in a wonderful rnan-
ner restored me to health, having removed the obstrudion
complained of, and in consequence my conipleXioui- which
was exceedingly yellow,, has resumed its wonted colour, my
health is quite recovered, and the pains in my head and sto-
mach,
.with numberless other complaints, too numerous to
mention, which have now all subsided, and I am once moro
in full health and spirits, able to encounter every difficulty.
I beg you will make my case public, as. many youpg women,
from a sedentary life, have similar eamplaintt, which they
are unwilling to attribute to the real cause-want of exertion.
Pt rmit me to return you my most grateful thanks tot
all favours, through the medium of Mrs: Smith; and bblieve
me,

Your much obliged, iittd very hUmble Servant,
Exeter, Aug. 4, TBos. C ROLINE A 10( E R
Welch's Female Pills, with DiredionS, price 2s. gd.
Box, are sold wholesale by G. Kearsleyi FleetLstreet, Lon-
don.; Dicey and Co. Bow Churchzyard-,Cheapside ; F. New-
berry, No. 45., St. Paul's Churcli-?ardi • bacon and CO,
No. _l5O, Oxtord-street ; Butler, ChiaNicie; and Bat:lay
aluilSon, Fleet Matkct.
-rrg' A sanot her Medicine is sold under the name of Weleh'S
Female rills, wnich is spurious, Pm-el:users are requested to
remark,' as the surest testimony or puthentieity, that each
Bill of Directions. is signed with the-name of C. Kearsley in
hand=writing; and on the outside, whereby Seryants cannot
be imposed on, the Stamp is printed, by permission of His
Majesty's -Honourable. Commissioners of Stamps, thus
L. .I(earsizy, No, 46i Fleet-street. None others ate genuine.-

IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT.

HOUSE OrPEERS.

WEDNES,DAY, MARCH-5..

In an Appeal from the Court of K-ing's Bench,
IVlacdonall 7.!: Bailey, Mr. Knapp was heard for the
Defendant, after which the judgment of the Court'
of King's Bench was affirmed, with 801 costs.
Mr.: Fordyce, Survekof-General of the Crown
Linde, presented the Third Report respething-the
Land Revenue of the Crel.vn---which was ordered to
lie on the Table. - ' ' '
• The Qualification Indemnity Bill was read a second
time, and committed for to-morrow.
Adjourned till to-morrow.

HOUSE OF COMMONS.

ViEpNESDAY, '.MARCH
‘5.

Mr. C. IltrreitiNsoN obtained leave to rbring in
a Bill' for ereEting a new Gaol in the City of Cork;
Mr. ,FoitnycE presented at the. Bar the Third Re-
port of thr, Surveyor General of Crown Lands,, ac-
cording 'to the prescriptions of anAEt of Parliament..
Ordered to lie on the Table and to bt4 printed.
A Person from the Commissioners of. the Thamess
Navigation presented an Abstraa of their Disburse-
ments for the year 18.05.—Oraered to lie on the
Table. •
••• . •
LORD MELVILLE's IMPEACHMENT. •

•Mr. WHITBREAD brought- up a Report :from the
Committee appointed to:manage the Impeachment
of Lord Melville. • The Report, Was read:lt stated,
that Alexander Trotter, who had acted as .Paymaster,
&c. to Lord Melville,- while Treasurer of the Navy;
had refused to answer certain questions touching the
said office, which were put to him by the said Com-
mittee.—Ordered-to lie on the Table.
On the motion of Mr. WHITBIIBAD, the prece-
dent on the -Journals was read, which refers to the
case of Nicholas Caxton, Solicitor,of the Treastiry,
who had refused to answer questions before a Com-
mittee of that House, in the year 1742, and who, for
such refusal, had been committed to Newnte by.or-
der of that House. • Several other precedents; of a
similar nature, referring, to the cases of,'Thomas
Heath and Robert Harley, &c. were also read. These
precedents being entered as read,
Mr. WHITBREAD mOed, pursuant, as 'he stated,
tc instructions from the ComMittee, That Alekander
Trotter should be committed for the said offence to
the custody of the Serjeant at Arms. •
• The SPEAKER put the:question, That Alexander
Davisbn should he committed, &c, Which produced a
general laugh. Upon order being restored the ques-
tibn was correctly put.
' Sir WIII".•ELFORD rose and expressed his•hope'
that the House would not adopt the. proposition Of
the Honourable Member, and consent to commit
Mr. Trotter for refusing-to answer the questions al-
luded to, Upon a -fair Consideration of the reasons
that; induced that refusal,- • When Mr. Trotter
derstood that he 'was to be examined before this
Committee, he very naturally considered the pro-
priety of declining to _answer any questions which
might have the effect of criminating himself, or ex-
posing himself to a civil suit. Accordingly, upon
questions' being proposed-which appeared to Mr.
Trotter to have that tendency, he, had recourse to'
the advice of Counsel, and this advice corresponded
with that which was proriounced law by several
of the Judges in another place: The majority of
the Judges had, he was aw are, declared the law to
be otherwise. But still doubts existed upon the
que,stionj namely, whether a Witness was compel-
lable to give an answer.to any.such question as might
subjea himself to a civil aCtion? and in consequence
of these doubts ifwas understood that a Declaratory
Law was deemed necessary, and was intended to be
brought 'forward. Under these circumstances, con-
sidering the difference 'of opinion which prevailed
upon the point which applied to this subject even
abiong the, Judges, and that it was not' yet, ascer-
tained what the law is, but that on the contrary a
Veclaratory Law was in contemplation, which two
of the most respectable Lay Lords had very-proper-
ly said would require the :most mature delibera-.
tion, he trusted the House would not inflict the pro-
posed punishment upon the conduCt,of Mr. Trotter.
The Hon, Baronet read the opinion of Counsel.
under which Mr.. Trotter acted. This opinion' was
sl
oned by .Mr. Serjeant Shepherd and Mr. Alex-
aiider, and imported that a Witness was not etim-
pellable to answer any qneStiOn., the effect of 'Ai-Ikb
might be to subjeCt him to a civil suit. , With all
these considerations, in view,•it struck his mind, and
he hoped it would appear in the same light to the
House, that pending the, progress Of the Bill, which
was tioW in the_ other House •of Parliament, and
which was introduced by. 'the Hon. Mover him-
self, it would be more reasonable and just that the
Committee should suspend-their inquiry upon this
part of the case-. It would, indeed, be inconsistent
with the grounds Upon which that Bill professed to
rest to take a different courser,-for that Bill, as well
as the ACt of Indemnity from criminal prosecutions,
obviously recognized :the principle 'on which tile
conduCt Com' lained of in Trotter was quite justi-
fiable.-.. Prom these.considerations he must say, that'
to commit Trotter into custody would be an ad of
oppression. If Mover-would consent to,
lrive the inquiries of the Committee suspended, so
far as. Mr. Trotter was concerned, until the Bill be-,
fire the other .Hou,se should be 'passed into a Law,
retrial -of 'hotter to answer any question put to

hini by the COmmittee could' not be excused ;
and upon the •enaarrient of such Law; he believed
that Mr. Trotter would -not be inclined to make
any refusah
•Mr. FOX said, the if no Bill of Indemnity what-
,
ever had pissed, or was passing through Parliament,
- would be, extremely Wrong, in
.the House to
take the course recommended by the Illon.Marotiet,
and refuse to sonaion,the condo& of its Committee.
'Upon sUch an application 'as-that'under discussion,
• it was not fOi- the Houice to•consider whether Trot-
ter was legally compellable to answer certain
,ques,
tions whin might have been put to him by the
CoMmittee, Now it should be taken for granled
that the questions
,proposed' to him were correa,
otherwise the House 1)4 not a proper.cenfidence
in its Committee. What was the case? • Why,
that upon the recommendation of this Committee,
a wa I?rought in " to indemnify Trotter from
aria; aLitipn that, might arise out of his.answers
Leac:Te thcin, alOtough the opinion of many Lawyers
that he waD convenable to answer cipestions

,of that tendency. That opinion, which prrvailed
before the Bill was introduced, was since strengthened
by a declaration of a great majority of the Judges.
How could the, House then,', upon a question so
circumstanced,. reCencile it to itself to. delay the
progress.of great ProsecutiOn, as the Hon. Ba-
ronet proposed ? Such a proceeding would be, in
faa,..to withdraw their confidence from the .CoM-
rnittee, and to` imply a suspicion that that confidence
had been; abused. Coupling the preposition of the
Hon. Baronet for delay, with what had taken place
last year, when,, by a mere majority the cause of
justice had triumphed, the. House could not be
unaware of the obje&. But he trusted that the
House would not sanction the disposition that; was
manifested to withhold from thiS Committee the
degree of confidence which had never been refused
to any Committee upon similar occasions. '
Mr. IVHITBREAD observed, that if the .Mo-
tion he had introduced at_the instance of the Com-
mittee should not be agreed to, the House had better
withdraw its confidence from that Committee alto-
gether. It was impossible for him, consistently
with his duty, to state at present what pissed in the
Committee 3 but at the same time be could say,
that Mr. Trotter was treated, in the course of his
examination, with the utmost possible indulgence.
,In the opinion of many, indeed, among -whom he
was one, that indulgence had been often puShed too
far : he had' been indemnified from all Criminal
prosecutien,' and it was proposed to indemnify him
from all civil • anion.: he, had frequently demurred
,toquestions,'wh;ch, according to the declared opi-
nion -of eight of the Judges, he was legally com-
pelled to answer, and yet titne Was'given him de-
liberately to advise with Counsel, &c. The Hon.
Member disclaithed the intention ,of offering any
thing with a view to extenuate or to apologise for
the condu& of the Committee. Nor did he mean
to state precisely the questions which Mr. Trotter
refused to answer ; but he could state in substance,
that they 'were of such a nature as, according to the
Law pronounced by the four dissentient Judges, he
could not be screened froth answering. The Hon.
Member repeated, that if the Motion before the
-House was not adopted; the Committee would be
'.placed in such a situation, that it would be bet-
ter to withdraw the confidence of the House
from them altogether, and to appoint another Coin-
mittee. ; - .

Sir I ELFORD dis Claimed .any intention, in
the observations which he felt it'his duty to submit,
toimpeach the integrity Of, ,or to weaken the con-
fidence due to the Committee. •

. .
The Motion was •agreed to.
Mr. WHITBREAD declined to go to the extent
of the preCedentS which the House had heard read,
and which committed the refractory Witnesses to
Newgate; &c. he should only move that the. Ser-
jeant at Arnis should attend Mr. Trotter before the
Committee, whenever *they shall think proper to,
examine him.—Agreed to.