The Sun.
London, England, 1830-10-01 00:00:00

CHAMBER OF DEPUTIES, Sm. 29.

The order of the day was the appointment of
the Comaiissioners to prosecute the accusation Of
the Ministers before the ,Chamber of Peers ; the n•»
port of
.the ,Commission charged with the. examine-
tion of the. proposition of M. Boissy ; the
report of the Commissions concerning the project of
law relative to commercial loans ; the development ,
of the pr opOsitiend M. Mauguin ; the discusstoner
the project concerning the isuppision of the Jnies. I
Auditeuri ; andibe distnis.sion.of the meitiage'tiftlio
Chamber of Peers Concerning the abelition
law on sacrilege. The debates opineeVbyotiiii Elie- r
cuaiden., otniterning the.appciuticent bf, die Cori- 7
Inissiotters. to impeach the ex-Ministera before, the
Chamber ofn.Ppers4 4
M. °email de lallocliefinicauld wished to know
if the articles 91, 109,
.110, 123, •poul ,125 pf the '
Penal COdare really applicable to he four article"; •
of accusation against the, Ministers The speaker
*aid that 'he' found 'himself obliged to apply this
nitestion to the Chamber, •becarse the paragraph et
the report of the Commission of Accusation con.
corning the application of the abovaarticles„ had not •
been read by the Pramident.
M. Lafitte maintained that ha had read the pare-

graph, and that the Chamber bad discussed it, but
had not adopted it. However, the President sii`id,
that it the ChaMber thought proper the aiicuasion
should still be Open. •
The Cl:umber decided for the negative, as the
above article's had already been „ditiethised;and all the
paragraphs of the comtnissioiradopted.
The President: theft: read the paragraPhconcerning
the appointment of the commissioners: the parer
graph was as follows
"fhree commissioners belonging to the chamer
of Deputieri,Will he nainted by the-. Chamber by a st,;',
ere vote, to' take every necessary measure in the
name of the Chamber, in order to follow up the
impeackment of the Ex-Ministers before the Chandler
of Peers, to wham the present resolution and all fhe
documents of the proceedings will be forwarded int»
mediately." • •
" M. tle Coreelles.required that live ‘,,ostnnisaiosera
should be named instead of three, h ortletsthet thoir,
number might be proportioned to the defenders.
• This proposition %vita rcjecwl. end the paregraph
of the commission wee Whined. ' •
The Chamber then proceededle the noreinati.in
of the eminnissioners, who 'ate Berenget,
',Persil, and M. Mettler Monjault.
M. lklistchal, reporter of .the commission, charged
with examlnieg, the proposition of hi. Missy
d'Anglas, relative to the plosions, was. then called
to the tribune..
M. Persil made a repnrt oc a subsidy of 60,000,000
to he granted to the Goverumelir, And lie spoke as
follows, on the popular societieS:-.--
Now that ail the political pasidons have gained
now activity from the late events,` why should net
the' 291st article of the Penal
,Cinle' be put into
execution? Why does the doVerninent, itrmed,as
it is with the 292 d ,article, wait for:the decision of
the tribunals ? Why does it nut require .the innut-
&ate dissolution of all those. societies that ambit
'ion more than
_any thing , else liasgiyin 1,44 id,
amongst us ?

Ail I>euct4fit)
citmenp, ail our mere instep of
.speculating in the. bias,' do notliiiileiss, but sign
potitlons against the dohs; end Paris, 4101 well us
the provinees,-,is quite tetrified• byihe 'appearance
of men who endeavour to establish ell'irtiir" Franco
'ramifications of tits-popular societies ; :end -,they will
*PO kilibk Ottit:Ave ere' in the intistklisestrons,tiatetr
of our first revolution
Dentlnnen, such is tlie Cause of the loss of nil
confidence and the scarcity of motley. '1 be conti-
nual presence of tho principle of disorder, and the