The Sun.
London, England, 1830-09-21 00:00:00

EN (11.113f1

3t per Cent. 98%
3 per Cent. new,
4 per Cent. 1828,
' India Bonds 59 01
Exchequer Bills, 05 7
PLINTHS.
Greek, 31% 52
Mexican, 37%
Peruvian, 18 19
Portuguese, 58 60
Prussian,
Human 'lolg
Spanish, 24
TWO O'CLOCK.
The private letters by the Lisbon mail this morning
confirm the account of the workmen in the arsenal haring
struck for their wagea ; it appears that Don Miguel gets
all the money he can lay hold of, and puts it on hoard of
a frigate which constantly lays off his Palace, and by this
means lie can start off at his pleasure, should any disturb-
ance take place.
Consols continuo steady at 881 for Account, and for
Money 88/.
In the Foreign Market nothing doing up to the present
time.

FUNDS

Bank Stock,
India Stock,
Y per Cent. Cons. 8814
Do. for Acco►.nt, 884 %
Ditto Reduced,

Brazilian, 60%
Buenos Ayres, 27
Chilian 22 4
Colombian, 20
Danish, 61% 814
French 5 per Cent.
Ditto 3 per Cent.--

THERE 0' CL 0 CK.

Consols, 88k.
FOUR O'CLOCK.—CLOSING PRICES.
Consols 88i 4. Danish
Do. for Ac 88i Greek, 1825 32
Brazilian Bands 70 Mexican, 1825
Buenos Ayres Peruvian 18
Chilian Do. Russian
Columbian, 1824, 201 Spanish 24*

A correspondent in the Chronicle of this
morning puts the following pertinent Quere to the Editor
of that Journal..—" Sir, permit me to ask, through the
medium of your paper, whether CIIARL7B, the Ex-King
of France, is a Jesuit, and if so, whether his reception
here is not a violation of the law lately passed against that
order ?-3. K. H."

OLD BAILEY.-4TIIIB DAY.), ;)
OLD COURT.
James Hssnt, aged 32, a very respectable looking
was indicted for forging and uttering a chtiquit;for
payment of 901. 10a., with intent to _defraud lifeifirie
. Jones, Lloyd, and Co , bankers. Another oonnt ehdriel
it with intent to defraud Messrs. Shoolbred and other'. P
Mr. Bonen; (with whom was Mr. Lux) stated theca*
to the Jury, and explained the bearing of the new law ia
cases of forgery, which did not as heretofore requiter:al
of the forged document having been manufactured is ill
particular place or county ; it being now only sufficient
to
prove it a forgery. The Learned Counsel then called the
following witnesses:—
James Tuesdale examined—l am clerk in the house of
Messrs. Lloyd and Co. ; Messrs. Shoolbred and Ca. bop
cash at our house ; they are extensive haberdashers la
Tottenham-court-road. On the 26th July, shout four
o'clock, the cheque now produced was presented at oar
house by a ticket porter, named Gardner ; it bore a very
strong resemblance to the hand-writing of Mr. Cook,
partner in the house of Shoolbred and Co. I refused par
went, having my doubts that it was a forgery, but an*
across it. It differs from the usual signature; it 00
perhaps, be my mistake. A person named Mar* is
consequence, was sent with the porter, to W• &Mall
that he received the cheque from.
George Gardner examined—l am a ticket petits
_bust
26th stand in Fenchurch-street. I was, there es_k_w
26th of July. A person came to me with ebslsiL"2
a quarter before four o'clock. The prison"sit tbeloret:
that person. He pulled me on one sidst
cheque, and asked me to go to Jones, Lawl",
Co., and get it cashed. He gave dirediatil
change I was to have, and desired me to eiriLl"
him at Ur. Walker's, Mark• lane, aid if be was ostles"/
he would be on the Corn-exchange. I took thiskatik4 do"
to the Bank, but it was refused Wisest. '
wa 14•"1,,,,t
banker from whom I received it, and arms
out with me. We proceeded to Mark-104,h° cP""' -
to 7,--
C6fimtonednithto7e3biyiacornh.nkaeGuingatgehk.e,:br:euuttnilcoacomwnuedheloxdmtWodoalaik,fierna.dndtbVireittrigoineresdew the
Thy niertsi
the prisoner, who gave me the cheque. The eite
prisoner's person. I subsequently e the prisonor4
custcdy. lam quite gositive that be is the pries! In:g
gave me the cheque. I pointed him Out .tregl Su/
of bun
several others, and I have so good a reediest
that I am certain that I do not mistake hisin
Cross-examined by Mr. Climate PitthUret.,`":
saawdeseription s.
the habit of taking cheques to bankers--no
from persons I meet in the streets, but getter "" ".
tlemen that I know. to
(This witness underwent a long cross-eistsi"'
the identity of the prisoner, but he persevere4,l4,o""T"
that be was the person that gave him the Cbsfille'tt
John Massey, a clerk in the banking-Ws°
and Co., corroborated the testimony.of the )sat "'tea si
The cheque now produced was the same' WI PreWi,,din ,
their house for payment ; be believed it to be l'"L2
although it much resembled the hand-writingof
gli
and Co. is
haboSissber
James Shoolbred examined—l am Lurie@
Tottenbam-court-road. The prisoner was is
on the 26th of July last. I sent bits out Inibor
on the morning of that day. He went into "1:
op
rTebseemcbhieeqsumenynopiavrtpnrond
Whilst in my employ, he used to fill
'su,cedbutisl
and has often seen me and my partner
it toss not at.,
believe it to be in the hand-writin of the prisoner. i;
prisoner did not return home one he 26th of Atli;
ought to have done, but remained out until the ndrur4
When he came home an officer was in waiting. sob
.° A
him into custody. He asked " What is it for ?"
a forged cheque has been presented at our bistkeW',
he was suspected of having something to do With ?
said do you miss a cheque from your cheque Of! or
not in my
say handwritiet
told him it was no consequence what we missed, 101/10
go with the officer. I asked him why he did sot !Ai
home the night before, as he knew our anxiety 11IP';01
the business he was sent on, he replied that be
able to finish his business that day, and bee'
fatigued he thought it better to sleep in the silty*
might be there early in the morning.
Crew-examined—l have a young man io tario
named Powel ; he bears no resemblance to the PrwiLe4./
person. There was a review in Hyde Park by hie
"'"
on the 26th of July. ola, of the
Mr. Gregory Cork examined—l am vimood
last witness. The signature to the cheque 09: Pot,o the
is not in my hand-writing. I have freques tat, of the
s: bow
prisoner write, and I believe the writingis the
cheque
John
Edward
oli e
Powell examined.--/ w— and
hie.
' the etoidof
j
of Messrs. Shoolbred. I know time prilloo...th
often seen him write. I believe the band-writinodebln arch'
body of the cheque to be hie. 1 was not is Fe,
street on the 26th of July. itig is
en
Henry Barker examined--I believe the band"
the body of the cheque to be the prisoner's. loin(
John Forrester, one of the City Police, pawl". ,
the prisoner in custody on the 26th of July.
'l'his was the case for the prosecution. 020
The prisoner, on being called on fur his defence,
was advised by his friends to leave it entirely _,,,;t to
Counsel. He afterwards, however, made a 110$47:060
account for his not returning to his employers 001.7001
of July, which was, he said, in consequence patTh cad
been induced to go to see the review in Hyde
neglecting his business. ado°
Simon Stright examined—l am a hatter; the rlthiab
was in partnership with me for two year's duriA the
wo
time 1 have seen him write daily. Ido not ud;:iiisf
cheque now produced to be in the prisoner's bl, WA'
Mr. Borixte—ls is at all like his band-WIWI. difie
ness—Were I asked the question, and tot swan
circumstances, I should say that I did not los*
~ I
writing. v ekr'"
Mr. Nichol examined—The prisoner Was,l",, cheque
certainly do not believe the hand-writing IsLoblaso
now produced to be his. It does not bear sol"--
to his writing. , I have
toatt
ppit
errtirkhoei
nos
ancabht:he qoueutut
26th
aohcnatehlrift al-ojpiuuanrlslytyt
Mr. Carter examined—l am an accoan seep
known the prisoner six years, and have fie' he /0e
him write ; for a short time be was my cies" d,,erritig
about three months since ; I shall say the bli°
Mr. Nichols recalled—l remember the reties' I el'
itiswgwneolaovsfterptobrmoee.
presents
oirlhcitiektoran:ne
ird: sod:
siwidv
0:301:11::vrt;i11:1)11::::
il
Panton-aquas. him, as we were not on friendly terms!. it witi,nu ries°
stand to Panton-square.
Mr. George Caife examined—l am a "'",r.,,0 yairl
he came to my house on the 26th July, between re, AO
two o'clock, soil stopped there until ballJ*11;1 bini_.,lll
The prisoner dined with me on that day. se bor
the drawing-room when I went from boo, id
four o'clock. Mrs. Clife dined with ""
r
Mrs. Caife was then called. f the prisOto.
Mr. Justice BAYLIT said the question 0. . to
guilt turned upon his identity ; he did not will,' here
I have known the prisoner
the case, but he would ask the Jury whelb utioe"-
not satisfied that the witnesses for the pro
of
been miJury staken.
The said they should wish to bear the eY t
Mrs. Caife. Old het
Mrs. Caife was then examined, and corrsh° r
husband's testimony ; after which ura fie
s'
The Jury said, we are satisfied, tsY - oish
diately returned a verdict of Not Guilty. to;ssta -
The announcement of this verdict was ij.rifeitity of
f.
clapping of hands and other demonstrations 000
Mr. Justice BAYLItt severely censured tils ilf
lees
such conduct in a Court of Justice. .oie P
affected, and shed tears. Ile bowed re'll"""
The prisoner on hearing the verdict
_4°714 ts
Court as be left the dock. '

--- ..--"'- -----
NEW COURT. „A for otelliiti
Edward Hill, aged SG years, was indieln o oles ,i
on the 26th August last, five silver spoons, 1),,1-,0, P*;
2/. and upwards, two gold seals, six row. m 1": nrelarg
of silver spectacles, and various other articles, the 1- v
of 'William Henry Parry, his brother•in-10,,' Oa Vito
The prosecutor stated that the prieeaar,L7sog a!,701
brother, and was in the Iroquois habit 0, " osorlft
house, and that he called on the 'raping ofdo 1001-'O,
in the indictment, and after staying about 11.1 1 Oa 0,
in a very abrupt manner. Ou his (wit,l4l:l.`ti,le, oe,i,
his bureau the next morning he missed t'ie etc,' tbe l'of
tioned in the indictment ; he instantly WI bisooloa3,o
saner and went in search of him, and (?°Putaietir ,
,:t.
afterwards in a public-house, where he fth 04:yeto
bun into custody and when he was °a'
ticlTesheheprboa;lerlotystwweesrneofwoupnrodd utipeedon,
abnd•idontio bycoil::
prosecutor. of D aieiso.; re-
Robert Smith, a police constable lato, 01 ow
roborated the statement of tidingthilt fig „roFertY
garded the searching and fi tan
_..r c
produced upon the person of the pfiSa eiro 0 aria liiry
The prisoner declined saying anY:rogo, old thl
The Commox Stuisavr 11"Tua ,iti, bedltiag
immediately returned a verdict of 11.1 ilowoj for
James Lucas, aged 50 eats was IP'

and entering end stealing therefrom 48 planes,
Value 61, and VariOtti other carpenters' tools, the property
of Thomas Griffiths and William Fenn.
Thomas Griffiths, earpenter, of Islington, stated, that
his workshop, which is situated in a court-yard near his
house, Was broken open on the night of the 3d of August,
and.the property stated in the indictment was stolen there-
from. The prisoner had worked as journeyman for him a
week before the robbery.
Two police-officers, of N division, deposed to appre-
hending the prisoners in the Kingsland-road on the day
of the robbery, and on searching him found some dupli-
cates of the lost tools in his possession.
Several pawnbrokers came forward with part of the
property, and proved their being pledged by the prisoner.
The property produced was identified by the prosecutors.
The prisoner made an incoherent defence.
The COMMON SERJEANT summed up with his usual
perspicuity, and the Jury returned a verdict of Guilty.