The Sun.
London, England, 1830-02-18 00:00:00

FAKES FEE STONE OF 81. ES. TO SINE THE OFFAL&

s. d. ton. d. s. ft. to n. cl.
Inferior Beasts 22 2 13i Large Lambs
Second quality ditto 2 6 3 3i Prime small ditto 0 0 0 0
Prime largo Oxen... 3 4 3 81 Large coarse Calves 4 4 4 8
Prime Scots, &c..... 3 8 4 0 Prime small ditto 5 4 5 8
Infcricr Sheep 2 4 2 6 Large Hop 1 4 310
sccond quality ifitto 210 3 4 Small Porkers 4 2 4 0
Coarse-woolled ditto 3 8 4 0 Suckling Calves 12s. to 32... each.
3outhdownWethcrs 4 0 4 4 Quarter oltings 1 Is. to 186. each.
surmr, AS PER CLERK'S STATEMENT.
Beasts. Sheep. Calves. rigs.
'2 411 ,410 I 113 I 110

NEWGATE AND LEADENHALL MARKETS.
At per stone, by the Carcass.
s. d. to s. d. I

S. d tom. d.

Beet 9 2 3 4 Veal
Mutton

SHIPPING INTELLIGENCE-(THIS DAY'S',`

FROM LLOYD'S.
DEAL, FEB. 17.—Wind N.W. and W.—Arrived
from London, the Malkin, Ellice, for Halifax.
PLTmotiTtr, FEB. 16.—Wind E.—Arrived Pe
Alice, from Yen Diemen's Land. •
PORTSMOUTH, FEB. 17.—Wind W.—Sailed the
Lord Melville, Brown, for Antwerp.
PENZANCE, FEB. 16.—The Jane bf Pnclstc!":'
John Philp, late master, was blown up on riue Per,
at three o'clock yesterday morning. A brother 0'
the master is in custody charged as the incendial.
None of the other vessels were injuredby the
plosion.
FA LXOI7III, FEB. 16.—Wind E.—Arrived th- Pett°l'
Harris, from Seville.
DA R rmorrn, FEB. 16.--Arrived the Alexander, ol''
from New York ; and the Henrietta, Lyon, from Charles'
ton.

LIVERPOOL, FEB. 16.—Arrived the Churchill, Dunstauf
from Figuera.

The Orbet, Browny, from Cnha, ham arrived at Cowen'
The Elizabeth, Hack, from New York, has :tithed Of
Dover.

OLD BAILEY.-(T1110 DAY.)

OLI3 COURT.
These Seasions commenced this morning itefore the usual
City authorities.
Mr. Juvtitte BAYLZIr, Mr. Baron TIOLLAND, and lap
Justice Bosarctottj are the presiding Judges.

A SUMMARY STATE)IP.NT, nEsegteTtre °Fawn VARIOUS oirerustlO
WITH WIIICR nut PRISONERS SEvERALLY STAND CIIARINED.
Burglary b Delivering a letter with in- I
Housebreaking 1 tent to extort money ...... ,
Forgery
/I,,rse-stealing 9 Receiving stolen g00d5........ '
1
Highway robbery
Unnatural crime 1 Manslaughter
Stealing in dwelling-houses 4 Larcenies
Stealing a letter when em- Uttering Counterfeit Coin
ployed in the Post-office... 1 Fraud 1
Embezzling 5 _......

Of the above number, 45 are I
In the City, and 125 iu the Cow]

Total ll
charged with crimes committed

STATE OF HIS MAJESTY'S GAOL OF NEWGATF,
MADE up TO TUESDAY ETEIVIXO.
Prisoners under sentence of death
Prisoners under sentence of transportation for life 3B
14 years
7 years
Imprisoned for felony and misdemeanours
Committed under the Bankrupt Laws 1
Whese judgments are respited 6
Acquitted en the ground of insanity, and remain S
For trial at the ensuing Sessions llO
Committed for trial for Conspiracy „,, 1

?dales 215 I Females

John Meeeham, aged twenty, was capitally indicted for
breaking and entering the dwelling-house of Wm. Nadler,
and stealing therefrom a watch, value 71, the property of
John Fife.

The pi oseeutor Phted that be lived at Mile-end. On
the 18th of January, during his temporary absence from
lame, his house was entered, and the watch taken out of
a trunk in his bed-room. It was afterwards found at A
pawnbroker's in the Commercial-road. The watch was
worth more than 71.

George Giles, a pawnbroker, deposed that the prisoner
pawned the watch which he now produced (and which
was identified by the prosecutor), at his shop on the day
of the robbery. Witness, however, could take opts,
himself to say that it was not worth half the sum the
prosecutor valued it at
A constable stated that the prisoner bearing that be
was supected of the robbery, 'voluntarily came forward and
surrendered himself into custody.

The prisoner denied all knowledge of the robbery.
Mr. Justice • BAYLEY, in summing up, told the Jury
if they thought the prisoner guilty of stealing the watch
he could not be convicted of the capital charge, as it did
not appear there was any forcible entry, and the value of
the property was under 51. _

Jury returned a verdict of " Guilty of stealing, bat
under the value of 51."

Louisa IVilliarns, aged IS, was indicted for stealing a
watch and other articles, value 71., the property of Wm•
Cooke.

The indictment charged the robbery to have been com-
mitted in the dwelling-house of Thomas Webb, which is
a brothel, at Somers' Town ; but there being no proof
that Webb was the occupier of the holm, the prisoner,
under the directi.n of the leaned Judge, was acquitted.
Henry Richards and Thomas Burdett were indicted
for breaking and entering the dwelling-house of Sneannna
Hawse, and stealing wearing-apparel of more than the
value of M.

The details of this ease were quite uninteresting. The
prisoners' guilt was clearly proved, and the Jury returned
a verdict of—Guilty—Death.

THE ICING V. TRAIT.

Mr. Justice 'ha-Lir pronounced the decision of the
Twelve Judges in this case. It will be recollected that
the prisoner, who had been a respectable merchant in the
city, was convicted last Sessions of a larceny, in fraudn.
lently obtaining possession of a large quantity of bristles.
The evidence was that the prisoner agreed to purchase
the bristles for ready money; before, however, be paid
for them, he sent a person and got an order for
their delivery. A clerk of the owner's went us
the wharf to see the goods delivered, and had
orders from his employers not to let them . go
without the money was first paid. The prisoner, how-
ever, prevailed upon the person to let him have the bristles
without the money, as he said he had sold them for cash,
and would pay for them before they were taken out the cart.
The bristles were then put into a cart, which the prisoner
followed, and gay* orders to the carman to take them to
another place than which he had first given orders for.
---
The Jury, on the trial, were of opinion that it was never
the intention of the prisoner to pay fur the goods, and re-
turned a verdict of guilty of a larceny. A point had been
submitted fur the decision of the Judges, whether or not
the manner in which the prisoner obtained poseessien of
the goods was sufficient in law to constitute a larceny.
Ilia Lordship, after citing a great number of authorities,
said it was the opinion of the Judges that the conviction
wax right. If a person or any one authorised by him,
gave up the owership to any goods, it was not a larceny ;
but if an owner parted with possession only on certain
terms, and not reliquieli his right of ownership until those
terms were fulfilled, it was in law a larceny. Now in this
case it teat clear the ownership had never been parted with,
As it never was intended to have have let the bristle! be
taken out of the cart before they were paid for. Besides,
it appetred the clerk of the owner had no authority to give
np possession, and not being authorised, it made the eerie
clearly a larceny. The conviction, therefore, was good
in law —Conviction affirmed.

The prisoner, a most respectable-leoking man, bowed
respectfully to the Court, but made no observation.

THE KI.O V. GILISEET WAKE.

The prisoner Wake was convicted last Sessions of a
burglary in the office of the Norwich Union Association. The
indictment described as the dwelling-honae of Mr. Bnnysn.
An objection was raised that this was not a proper descrip-
tion, as the house belonged to the Company, and not to Mr.
Bun) on, who was only a servant of the Company. The
point hid been referred to the Judges, who were of opi-
nion the house was properly described. Mr. Bunyon and
his family laved there, he had free access to all parts of it,
and the fact of his not paying any rent or taxes did not at
all alter the case; the conviction was therefore good in
law,—Conviction affirmed.