The Sun.
London, England, 1863-04-07 00:00:00

Marlborough

Beverley l7
Stockbridge lB
Chelmsford 23
Newcastle-on-Tyne 23
Carlisle
LY.;
Stamford
I Winchester
Nottingham
Cambridge
Southampton.
Gocdwood
GUST.
IPlymouth
Egham
Stockton
1 Oxford
I Lichfield ...

'MBER.
Brecon
Richmond
Monmouth
Manchester Autumn
Newmarket Ist Oct.

...22
...22

....2

-.:..22

:...24
....25

OCTOBER.
Coventry
Newmarket S.O ..12 1 Newmarket Houghton ..26

NOVEMBER.
Worcester..
IRISH.
APRIL.
Athlone 2l I Curragh

JUNE.
Wicklow l7 I Curragh ....... ,)...

JULY.
Bellewstown
Down Royal Corporation. 23 1

Importing Tea without colour on the leaf pre-
vents the Chinese passing off inferior leaves as in the usual
kinds. Iforniman's Tea is uncoloured, therefore, always
good alike. Sold in packets by 2.280 agents.
THE ROUPELL FORGERIES.—It has transpired
that three fresh actions, having reference to the
Roupell property, would have been sent down for trial at
the present Home Circuit, but on account of the defen-
dants not being prepared with the whole of the evidence
they intend to bring forward, they have been postponed to
the ensuing summer assizes. One of these actions relates
to an estate in the county of Essex, which is said to be of
the value of £30,000, and the two others relate to the
Roupell-park property at Brixton, in which it is said that a
sum of over £lOO,OOO is involved. It will be recollected
that at the former trial, when Mr. W. Roupell came
forward to acknowledge that he had forged his father's
will, and also the deed of gift having reference to the
estate of Kingston, which was then the subject
of litigation, the action was not tried out, but the de-
fendant consented to certain terms, In the eases that are
now to be brought forward, however, it is understood that
the defendants are determined to take the opinion of a jury,
and the case they intend to set up is that the deed and the
will were really genuine instruments, and that the
elo.eitfoa
Mr. . Roupell in coming forward to confess bt to
his
forger was to obtain the restitution of the P"detlat the
family. It appears that it was fully arrange,
present
causes should have come on for trial at the
as-
sizes, but a short time back an application
of the learned judges, on behalf
certain for
an order upon the plaintiff to :f te defendants, was made to one
produce
docu-
ments that were considerd essential to
their case,
and as this order could not be
complied with in
time, it was found necessary that the trials should be post-
poned, with the consent of all parties. The form of the
actions is precisely the same as the one already disposed ( f
and Mr. W. Roupell will again, of course, be the principal
witness in support of the claims of the heir-at-law, his bro-
ther Richard, but on. the part of the defendants a mass of
evidence will be adduced with a view to show that the instru-
ments alleged by Mr. Roupell to be forgeries are in truth
genuine documents, and it is understood that with regard
to the deed of gift a witness will be brought forward who
will swear that he saw the deceased actually sign it, If, in
the result, the jury should beef opinion that the case for the
defendants has been established, it will, of course, amount
to the expression of their opinion that Mr. W. Roupell is
innocent of the crime of which ho confessed himself guilty.