The Sun.
London, England, 1830-07-29 00:00:00

o. I I ,818.

LONDON, THURSDAY I

i,'VENING, JULY 29, 1.830:

- BRITISH INSTITUTION, PALL•MALL..
IS late MAJESTY having been graciously
pleased to direct that the interesting PORTRAITS
of the SOVEREIGNS and other distingui.hed indivi-
duals, Who asmi.ted in bringing the late War to its conclu-
sion, painted by Sir THOMAS LAWRENCE, should be
Exhibited for the BENEFIT of his FAMILY, the Di-
rectors of the British Institution, anxious to carry into
effret his -slajesty's most gracious intention. give notice
that the EXHIBITION of these PORTRAITS, with
several additional Pictures, is OPEN daily, from Ten in
the Morning omit Six in t.►e Eve ling.

of the body ; the vessels appeared loaded with blood ; the
lips and face were swelled, and of a livid hue ; there
was a eir..ular mark round the neck; on the right
side the skin was torn ; I could-AA form an opi-
nion what caused that laceration ; there were no
other external marks ; I then opened the head, and
found the ve.sels under the scalp ruptured ; the brain
had no unusual appearance ; the membranes of the brain
were loaded with blood s►any circumstances might have
produced such appearances. The hind would not have
oroduced the circular mark round the child's neck. The
prisoner was very anxious to tell me all the circumstances
attending the delivery of the child ; hut I told her not to
do to:), as I only was here to ascertain if she had been de.
livered or not; she said she had, but that she did not de-
stroy it. She then called nut to her mother, who was.in
the kitchen, to bring up a box, which she did ; it contained
baby-clothes, of a miserable description. She said, " Yeu
see, Sir, I never intended to destroy my child or I should
not have prepared these little things."
Mr. Gonsox—Can you form any opinion of the cause'
of the child's death? Witnees—l am of opinion the
child was horn alive, and that the mark round the neck
was sufficient to cause death; but I can form no opinion
what caused that mark

borne being decidedly the favourite, from his lengtl
of services and his well-stried honery and consis,
teney. He resides &instantly.in the countyamongs'
his congituents, and his amiable manners have rem
tiered him universally popular. The impression is
that he #jal Lord C. Manners will be reelected. 1
did noc-,however, lake up my pen to write upon
election** which I was reminded of only by thi
brevity of the cause-list. The following was the sob
ease of interest tried to-day.
George Brig ii was indicted for having, at tlu
parish of St. Peter, in this town, on the 2d of Juin
last, feloniously stabbed one James Sell, with inteni
to resist lawful apprehension and detainer, and tt
do him some grievous bodily harm,--Acquitted.

Admirsinn. 1 s.—Cateogticx, lx.

WILLIANI BARNARD, Keeper.

lh's Jay was published, Two Valet. Bvo., price 12s.
NOitil INGTON, cr the MEMOIRS of a
PEER.
London : llurrt, Cluncr, and Co., 65, St. Paul's
Chun:l:lnt&

HOME CHICUIT.-CHELMSIFORD, JULY 28.

WARREKER V. JOHNSON.

This svai an action for slander.

Th's lny was published, in fancy boards, pries. 6s.
TIRE FAMILY ALBUM and ItEPER-
e. TORY of AMUSEMENT and INSTRUCTION.
66 Tn pallia.e dullness and give time a shove."—Cowper.
!Amami : Hurst, Chance, and Co., 65, St. Paul's
Church yard.

Mr. Serjeant ANDaEws (with whom was Mr.
Law,) stated the case. The plaintiff is a shoe-
maker bT trade, and is a neighbour of Mr. Johnson'.,
by whom he had frequently been employed in brew-
ing, with the art of which plaintiff was likewise ac-
quainted. All at once, however, the defendant dip-.
continued employing him, for what reason Warreker,
could not at first ascertain. One day meeting the
`defendant, be requested to know what was the rea-
son of his so doing, when for the first time plaintifl
learnt ithy Mr. Johnson's reply, as follows :—" You
have stolen two bushels of grain., and I can prove
it." Upon hearing this plaintiff went to Mr.
M'Lauehlin, a Magistrate,. to complain of the de-
! fendant's language. The latter gentleman promised
to call on the defendant arid desire an explanation.
This he did, on which occasion Mr. Johnson re-
peated his words, and although he was reminded
that the words were actionable, he would • not re-
tract them or make an apology. Defendant had not
entered a justification, and it would be proved that
he uttered the words complained of as slanderous.
The Jury returned for the plaintiff—Damages 20/.
Deborah Milton, wife of Jesse Hugh Milton,
%vas charged with having feloniously intermarried,
on the 28th of October, 1828, with Robert Sweet-
love, her former husband, Jesse Milton, being then
alive. She was found Guilty. The sentence was
deferred.

Crovhexamined by Mr. CAmtwarott—The prkoner
told me she bad no professional assistance at the time the
child was born. A surgeon had been sent for, but he did
not arrive until some hours after her delivery.
Mr. Ungham-r1 sm a surgeon; I saw the body of the
child, 'but did not examine it.

This day was publi,hed, price 31. Gd. bound, a New

Edition of

JOHNSON'S ENGLISH DICTION-
ARY, with WALKER'S PRONUNCIATION o
all the difficult awl doubtful Weeds.

The Counsel for the prosecution said he had no further
evidence to produce respecting the rause of the child's death.
Mr. Justice PARK here said it was Uterssaty, in artier
to support the indictment, that the child's death should
have been produced by strangulation; the Jury had heard
the evidence of a highly respectable professiooal man ; and
before the case was further proceeded with, he wished to
have their opinion whether they thought . that death did
me from such a cause. If they thought it did, he woul,l
then go on, but if they were not satisfied on that point, it
would he impossible to find the prisoner guilty.
The Jury, after a few minutes' deliberation, said they
were not satisfied as to the cause of death. They dull,
under his Lordship's direction, returned a verdict of Not
Guilty, and the prisoner was removed from the bar.
The prisoner, who was dreadfully agitated, was cau-
tioned by Mr. Justice Park as to her future conduct.
At the time the post left, Charles Wall was on trial
for the wilful murder of Sally Chance, by throwing her
down a lime-stone pit. This case excites the most intense
interest.

Printed by C. Co►rail, for Hurst, Chance, and Co.,
65, St. Paul's Church yard.
The two Stand ►rd Dictionaries of the English Lan.
page are those ofJohnson and Walker; the former in all
that regards the authority aturepelling of word, the latter
as to flick pronunciation. The object of the ♦olume now
offered to the Public is to combine in a portable form the
advantage► of both : and to assist in acquiring the ease
and elegance of a correct speaker, in the current language
of every day.

About half-past four in the afternoon am alarm
was given that the Cow t was on fire, and n dense
smoke was seen through the doors: the space in the
middle of the Court was immediately cleared.
Upon examination it was found to have arisen in a
plaCe called a kitchen, the stove of which had taken
lire, and communicated to some faggots. It was
soon, however, got under, though some time elapsed
before order could be re,tored.

~/,',,-?
44119r-----1!.--),%'74,'?'-Z-..e.---0-1--
1 , '' ' * / - '2- - - .- ' .•,
......... ..b. . ....,
o,
....-...--
I . K., ...,
.7,
A;
- -- :2.4
~.* ....., ~ . , ~
4, 4 A
' Z ' Ai ,(11..„,...,1
1.41.7 ' , *
4,-;—.7.-------" '‘S 41/ ):„,zed /' .1i
_/ 1
.!' , ,1! ..
t , V
~
....
...
( 7 ' , -, A ,ri -., ..c • _
.._,
,--- ~, ~ - .
k<',.- .....-. •
„, •
..,
/ 0 , s•,,.s
..,e -k. v., ..... , ......4., ..• 0 :..;..04. \.:,- ...,: ;1 ‘.,--,,.v,.,tt
_,-.4'"/ :.,•\,.skli.rtmil. '' - :,'. :i'..' ..1 _rte ' 4...4.,,.,54t0 ~
~„.,,,________,, i.. s , .4.,.
~...,,..mc„,„.4),,.... , ~.=
t.
io - _... _,.. Kt... v •
..z
./...,--'. . ---) f
„ , i -1 ~...i....", ,„), ..4."'-- , - 1
~,/, .9,
...
i 4, ) r
~.,
.o-- , s.
/ _, . i-.A. 1.----.6 • - or -",.... ~.• .4 ,Is r-, ,t 'l' • 44. v.
..P.-1..•-••/''N -.AA.- i .4. • ... ... ,_ , ....„,..,
..,.,
;' V: '• - 4t 0 I lag'

PAPERS.

PRICY? 711.

Auasutmo, Jut.ar 21.—A letter froth Faris, of 16th
July, says :—" We can affirm on eon,' authority, il-it his
Royal Highness Prince Paul of %Hem',erg, brother to
his Majesty the King of Wurtemberg, has acceptel tkr
S avereignty of °recces, offered him by Great Britain,
Russia, and France. Mk Revd Highness was horn 19th
January, 1788, anal married at t.nditoiphere; in Septem•
her, 1805, to Catherine Charlotte Princess of F.l4xe Alten-
iowg, who was born on- the 17th June, 178 f. The
children of this mania :re are Frederica Charlotte Maria
(now Helena Paaa lamp in January, 1807, and
married in February, 1824, to the Grand Dike Michael
of a ; Frederick Charles Augustus, born in February,
1808; Pauline Federica Maria, born in February, 1810,
and married in 1829 to the Duke of Nassau ; Frederick
Augustus Eberhard, horn in January, 1818."
VIICNNA, Juts 17. —Metallititles, 1003 ; Four per
Cents., Oak; Bank Shares, 1,356.
11ANOVra.—A letter from London of 19th July con-
tains the following statement

" At the first- splendid Drawing-roam (if the present
King in St. James's Palace, on the day of his accession,
the Hanoverian Minister, Count Munster, was present,
And was honoured with the same gracious reception as the
English Ministry, his Majesty having expressed to that
meritorious and much esteemed statesman his entire antis.
faction at the faithful and didinguittherl servicAs rendered
by the Count to his late Majesty. 't•Ve believe, that later
the mention of these simple facts, there is no need of any
farther refutation of the wholly unfounded reports, whirl)
had been spread in reference to the well known differences
of a pretended misunderstanding between his Alajosty,
when Duke of Clarence, and the Count. On the con-
trary, we are able to assert, upon good authority, that the
present King has always looked upon that difference in the
same light as his late Majesty, and always fully acquainted
himself with the steps taken by Count Munsterrespectirig
it. The Countess, as is well known, has for many years
enjoyed the special favour of the present Queen."