The Sun.
London, England, 1839-04-09 00:00:00

a=4

The House of Commons
smet last night, after the ad-
journment for the Easter holidays. The Setasert re-
Ported that the petitioners against the return of Mr.
LatIEN) for Carlow, had not completed the required
reeognizances. The order for hearing their petition was
accordingly discharged. diately presented a petition Mr. E. J. STANLEY imme-
to amend the return by in-
serting the name of Mr. GISSORNE.
A new Writ was issued for Ayrshire in the room of Sir
T. DUNLOP ; and as it was moved for by the Tories,
th9Y expect to carry that county.
Lord JOHN RUSSELL stated the motion he should
submit to the House on Monday, and subsequently
added that on Friday he should move to postpone all
the Orders of the Di), on Monday, so that he might then
bring forward this resolution as a substantive motion.
The ATTOENEY•GENERAL gave notice that he means
to introduce a Bill to amend that part of the New Bank-
rupt Act which compels newspapers to insert advertise-
'tents for three shillings each.
Mr. POULETT THOMSON is, as speedily as possible,
to move that all Railway Bills be postponed till April
23d. Would not a general measure be more creditable
than this perpetual meddling?
sluesti
.:The North American Boundary was the subject of a
on which elicited from Lord PALMERSTON the
elnferrnation that there is a disposition to appoint
n .
-1111701sgioners to settle the matter.
Colonel SIBTISORP put a question about the Chartists,
'or rather the Pikeists—for these bodies ought not to
13e confounded—which induced Lord JOHN RUSSELL to
disclose that a correspondence on the subject had taken
Place between the Government and the Lords Lieute-
nant of some Counties. The Pikeisrs are of more im-
Penance than we had supposed, and have disturbed the
repose of official men.
The House rose before six.

The following is the motion which Lord JOHN
RUSSELL is to submit to the House on Mon-
tle.), :......“ That it is the opinion of this House, that
it is expedient to persevere in those principles
Which have guided the Executive Government in
Ireland of late years, and which have
and
veproodieucgneeedtrhal
the
efectual administration of the law,
If Peirovement of that part of the United Kingdom."
for the words " late years,, -I,e "
since 1834" were
10 be used, there would probably benot theob wctionirldtso
4hi4 motion ; but we are not sure that 41
to embrace the
late years,,
may not be held
I)eriod oc
, Lord STANLEY'SGovernment of Ire..
R4l_44' and include approbation of
Lord
the Coercion Act.
"-Inuld any Radicals- so interpret them, .
4
fail in obtaining their
JOHN itussELL will
son
in him,
rPort. It may be very prudent .
'Wit: tlhrea landvi e 7
to be anxious to
to Tory declamation,
l'irc"fe that the law has been effectually administered
k
thei, but there are some Radicals who
roua,w in Ireland, because it is a one-sidedtbairnbias:
4 InStrtirnent
tered. , should not be effectuallymaAt miity,s
meet 1 4ecOrding to their view Lord NoR
manly- -43' in ttot effectually administering, buft
thein
law,' „cases suspending the administration
e o
The law in Ireland," they say,the mere
" is .
exn. .
r.essio,
°Presen:imoenf invents tyrant's will. It is the embodied_
sion of the Orangemen. It is redolent of
Feu.
rei,ectukily , and speaks with their tongue._ If
administered, whether by
sulsrPPre3sino,producinguneasiness, must be the re-
Whigs or To-
tout anu we are scarcely inclined to support such a
Jo 1":' The Radicals say that, and perhaps Lord
runiftl4, uss}Ar. may word his motion so as not to
w."e least chance of cutting off their support.
the Ith these exceptions, his resolution will bring
question to a fair issue. It is idle to assert, as
some ,
Lord oi the Tory Journals do, that the motion of
co 14DEN, because it was technically for a
do of Inquiry, was not a direct condemna-
-711, of the Government. It was opened as such,
Toriesuas such it was resisted. It was carried by the
as a rty question in the Lords, and as a
;Aortas questionst is to be met in the Commons. The
of the ords, after Lord RODEN's inculpatory
;,.I),Leech, was a censure, and it remains to be seen
nether the vote of the Commons will pronounce
et 4 a."'"al. Under this asiecLt. v:‘; approve of the
JalOtforward and bold manner in which the
",irlmisters have met the case, and we trust that the
"••••:...........___

/tg
4&r.
..o.4kinelarra
Vile aunt

LONDON :
TUESDAY, APRIL 9, Mg.