The Sun.
London, England, 1839-10-17 00:00:00

PRECEDING.

- ..
Wheat 7os -----
Yd. Oats
I Barley

DUTIES ON FOREIGN CORN.
Wheat J. Bd. I 1
Oats
1 Barley ll. 10d. Rye

THE MARKETS.

COAL MARKET.

s. d.
Adair's
Walls End Haswell
Leases Main l7 5. Walls End Helton
Original Windsor's I'vintop 2'l 0 Walls" End Lyons 22 6
Willington 22 t' Walls'End Lambton 24 3
Wylam. 2O 9 Walls End Stewart's 24 3
Walls End Brown's l4 6 Walls End Whttwell
Walls End Gosforth 23 5 Walls End Hartlepool ..... ... 24 4
Walls find Heaton ... .....
Walls End Hilda 22 3 Walls End Adelaide
Walls End Hotspur
Walls End Newmarch 22 0 Walls End South Durham... 23 0

Walls End Northumberland 21 6
Walls End Percy B nsham '2l 9
Bell's Primrose 419 6
Walls End Belmont
Walls Endßraddyll'sHetton 23 4)
ships arrived since

Blythe l6
Cowpen
Cu
Howard's Netherton Mani 17
Llangennech Coal
last market-day, 'AL

COUNTRY CORN MARKETS.

Oats.

Beans. I Pease.

8 to P.
39 43
39 44

40 40
41 42
41 43

ae

35 44/

42 44

3$ 45

33 40

tion which he had begun there. When he had com-
pleted his 17th year he entered the University of
Bonn on the Rhine, and attended lectures on the
classics, mental philosophy, history, statistics, ma-
thematics, politics, and political economy. Among
the numerous distinguished Professors of that cele-
brated seat of learning is Augustus William Von
Schlegel. Thus a most favourable opportunity
presented to Prince Albert of perfecting himself in
English, the correct accent of which he had before
acquired at Kensington and Claremont. When he
had finished his studies at Bonn and returned to
Coburg, the inhabitants of the Duchy vied with
one another in demonstrations of the heartfelt inte-
rest they took in the prosperity of the Ducal house.
Deputations were sent to the Duke to congratulate
him on the consummation of the education of the
Prince ; poems were presented to Prince Albert
welcoming him on his entrance into public life ;
and there were all over the country illuminations,
balls, and dinners in commemoration of this im-
portant period in the life of Prince Albert.
In 1838 he came over with his father
to this country, to witness the coronation of
her Majesty. They stayed longer at the Palace
of Buckingham than all other guests, and the Duke
ofShaexdebyChoebrurg
Majesty, Saafeld was particularly distin-
guisparture, conferred on him,w with greatho,previoucselyremtonlniyis
and
d-
in presence of a numerous attendance of Noble
Lords, the Order of the Garter. On their return
frombl
Italy,
Baron
rLondon,aonnand
sint o
ckiar Decembern, preparationsw
who
oB3h we re made for a tour to
aB, s
rot, severala t attended
eynedaerds
employed a
nd
his the
relatives.
affairs
It the
was
hbaeesDye nsuefkote of Saxe
deemed
u Co-
burg
necessary
to make a short stay at Munich, in order to take,
on several questions relating to Italy, the advice of
the King of Bavaria, who had been several times in
Italy. To the Bavarian capital, then, the Duke
accompanied the Prince, and the most marked ho-
nours were paid to them there, the public consider-
ing the brilliant expectations of Prince Albert well
founded, alid rumours to that effect having been
generally circulated by the journals of Germany.
A letter in the Hamburg Correspondent of Dec.
1838 says :—" No sooner had the illustrious visitors
arrived at Munich than his Royal Highness the
Crown Prince of Bavaria waited on them in person
and invited them to dinner at the palace. His
Royal Highness next day accompanied them to
view the most remarkable institutions, museums,
libraries, and erections. The following day was
devoted to field sports near Germering." Her
Royal Highness the Duchess of Leuchtenberg then
gave, on the 13th of December, a splendid dinner
in honour of the Duke and Prince Albert, to which
the whole diplomatic corps had been also invited..
A round of diplomatic entertainments next followeq•
The English Ambassador, Lord Erskine. gave a..
splendid concert and supper ; the Hanoverian Am-
bassador, Count Kielmansegge, a soiree; the
French Ambassador, Baron de Bourgoin, a grand
dinner ; the Russian Ambassador, Privy Conncillor
Von Severin, a dinner, followed by a bai payee ; and
the front of the hotel being in the evening splen-
didly illuminated. But for the departure. of the
Duke, the festivities wad for many more days
have continued. The remaining part of the
winter, Prince Albert passed in Italy, and, on.
his return, visited Vienna. When he entered
his apartments at the Castle of Coburg, the
first object which struck his eyes was the full
length portrait of her Majesty, which had been
sent him as a present. It is the portrait which, by
A. E. Chalon, Esq.,
mA paintedredbity,
express command of
Ihte. rA.generallyMajesty,
call
a was i
hi
The German papers
which, however, is not a name different from
Albert. This will best be seen from the following
paragraph translated from the " German Encyclo-
pedia," by Professors Ersch and Gruber :—" Al-
bert, or Albrecht," says this excellent work, " is
contracted from Adal and bert, and, tAnelabtriescohft,npobeele..
birth, also a landed nobleman.. Geilerapllryomspiescauk--
ing, Albert was formerly more in use in Germany,
ermwaoirldr,ecroelradtsedbottho
secondu,n t
ifno re r
to
be
avanidieda;ftesrtwiliarbdostbthwe
ously used." In anocrlisitcGerman records instead
of Albert is also found Alberic ; and as ric is the
the modern
English rich, the modern German retch, in the same
Germantbmanner
E ng lbent
Aisldi Adel,
r atainlisdoaniad;
ancient
noldeie
born.n SaxonG Adal
is
forms are likewise found. There occur in history
some very distinguished personages of the name of
Albert. Among them is Albert I. Duke of Austria,
and afterwards Emperor of Germany.
A. F.

STATE OF TRADE.—There was an exceedingly
gloomy market yesterday, and goods and yarns of almost
all descriptions were quoted lower than on the preceding
Tuesday. In consequence of the un'avourable prospects
for the coming winter, a number of individual spinners
and manufacturers in various parts of the neighbourhood
have already ceased to light up their factories. We have
not heard of any general agreement to that effect ; but
understand that several meetings, for the purpose of
considering the subject, are in contemplation, Man.
cheater Guardian.

(From the Atlas.)
The future historian, when he conies to write the
annals of the present times, will probably introduce
some such paragraph as the following in his narra-
tive of public events :
" The efforts of the Tories to supplant the Whig
Ministry in the favour of the Court were almost in-
credible. They left no means untried to bring them
into disgrace with the Queen ; private intrigue,
public vituperation, accusations of incapacity and
corruption, and every description of calumny that
malice could invent were put into motion in Par-
liament, and at the press, to effect this grand object.
They bought up all the venal newspapers to pro-
pagate their scandals, and subscribed large sums of
money in secret to sustain the agitation. In want
of real topics for abuse, they resorted to invention,
and at last finding their situation desperate, they
turned round and calumniated the Queen herself.
An unmarried lady in attendance on the Queen's
mother being afflicted with a malady which mate-
rtally enlarged the contour of her figure, her ap-
pearance naturally excited suspicions in the Royal
circle. The circumstance led to an inquiry which
completely cleared the lady's reputation ; but the
Tory party seized upon the case in the hope of
producing an impression'on the public mind against
her Majesty and her advisers ; and, sacrificing to
coarse discussion and vulgar curiosity the lady
whom they affected to defend, they made her name
a pretext for a fresh crusade against the Adminis-
tion. By such unworthy and revolting means the
Tories of this period laboured to subvert the Go-
vernment, but the good sense of the country was
in the ascendant, and their bolts only recoiled with
tenfold force against themselves."
Thus will history describe and dismiss the case
of Lady Flora Hastings.
We believe that the journals of this country,
from the earliest period to the present hour, might
be searched in vain for such an example of dis-
graceful and heartless profligacy as the Tory news-
papers hare exhibited in reference to this affair.
In the worst times of party animosity, the delicacy
of women has been held sacred, and the sanctity
of private misfortunes has never been invaded to
imp the wings of political malignity. But in this
instance, all considerations of the respect that was
due to the Queen, to the Ladies who form her Ma-
jesty's domestic circle, to the morals of the country
which must suffer, more or less, from controversies
of this peculiar kind, and, above all, to the Lady
Flora Hastings herself, have been utterly trampled
upon to subserve the most contemptible purposes
of a baffled faction. If the family of the Marquis
of Hastings have been deeply wounded by these
exposures, who, let us ask, are to blame ? Those
most dangerous and unprincipled allies who first
made this painful topic a subject of common scan-
dal and universal gossip, and who, reckless of the
feelings of the family whose honour they so un-
necessarily espoused, dragged the name of Lady
Flora before the public, and clamoured, day after
day, for explanations which could have no other effect
than that of spreading the knowledge of a calamity
upon which the most ordinary delicacy would have
suggested the propriety of silence. The whole pro •
ceeding reflects indelible disgrace upon that very li-
mited portion of the press which originated and kept
up the excitement ; and those who are best qualified
to judge of the oourse that ought to have been taken
were, from the first, opposed to the publicity into
which their pretended friends plunged every person
concerned. The Duke of Wellington, when he
was consulted by the Marquis of Hastings, advised
him "to be quiet." But the Marquis appears to
have been compelled into print by the rash and
hot brained zeal that insisted upon making the fame
of his sister a subject of daily investigation. What
is the result? A statement from Sir James Clark
which, if any such evidence were wanted, only
serves to prove that the inquiry ought never to have
been brought before the public at all. Jo that
statement, which will be found in a preceding
column, we refer the reader for the authoritative
details of Lady Flora's case, and shall merely re-
quest attention to a few observations that obviously
grow out of its perusal.

Sir James Clark states that he would never have
come forward to answer anonymous accusations,
feeling that the implied confidence of professional
intercourse ought not to be violated by any pro-
vocations of that kind ; but that the publication of
the i\larquis of Hastings appeared to render it a
matter of justice to the profession, as well as to him-
self, that he should lay an account of the case before

the public. In so far as Sir James . Clark is per-
sonally concerned, his statement is in the highest
degree honourable to his character, relieving him
at once from any doubts that could have been enter-
tained respecting his conduct, and showing that, if
blame is to be attached to any one, it is not appli-
cable to those who were in habits of intercourse
with Lady Flora. We recur to the particulars of
the case with reluctance, but they lie in a small
compass, and may be briefly recapitulated.
The peculiar appearance of Lady Flora Hastings
had, it appears, for some time become a subject of
remark in the Palace. In this fact the spring of all
the subsequent accusations is contained. It has
been made a distinct charge against the Ladies of the
Court that they " suspected" something, and out of
this suspicion they have been accused of getting up
a conspiracy against Lady Flora. Now, we ima-
gine that, if any unmarried lady in private life pre-
sented a similar appearance, similar suspicions would
inevitably exist, and similar remarks would inevita-
bly be made. It is in the very nature of society to
make such remarks, to connect certain appearances
with the causes from which they usually proceed;
and these remarks naturally and unavoidably gain
greater strength in proportion as the evidence of
time seems to sanction and confirm them. But if
in private society suspicions of this kind would be
entertained, and even acted upon in a more extended
circle, how much more reasonable and justifiable
was it to exercise a prudent vigilance in the Court
of a young Queen, whose honour was sacred in the
eyes of her people ? But these suspicions are
converted by the malice of party into a conspiracy,
and that, which would be inevitable anywhere else,
is, in the Palace, regarded as a cabal. The absur-
dity of this assertion is really ludicrous. For what
purpose is it supposed this conspiracy was hatched
against Lady Flora Hastings? What object had
the Ladies of the Palace'to gain? Why should they
conspire against Lady Flora ? Aupstioditl,aasvebecoubvreeeealnyll,ninwaltrhatoet
ibmluvrerdleariidngt
he conspiratorsgrou ncis o tfhethyemir
first instance—not to have prepared their own ma-
terials—instead of conspiring about materials fur-
nished by Lady Flora herself. Over and over again
ttit
tahquecreeus publicst was
ieorn.n
_whavehe
o
beenho
accuser.is
the
Nobody sickened
Common
inventedh e
L
Lady
d?y observation T i'eFlora's
answer
w
apapearance, which was the real accuser. A hundred
people may observe the same thing at the same
moment, and receive the same impression ; and the
attempt to establish a case against the first observer
_s
is about as rational as to attempt to determine the
first breath of gas that entered a balloon. One day
it was the Baroness Lehzen, another day the Mar-
chioness of Tavistock, a third day Lady Portman ;
—such are the expedients to which the explorers of
an accusation that never was made are driven in
their desperate efforts at propping up a vague and
dishonourable calumny.
The first intimation received by Sir James Clark
on the subject was a summons from Lord Mel.

bourne, who communicated to him, on the authority
of the Marchioness of Tavistock, the remarks that
prevailed in the Palace. Sir James, without mo:e
ample means of professional observation, could not
venture to give an opinion, and recommended that
no further step should then he taken. Yet Sir
James has occasionally been obliquely hinted at as
the " accuser ;” and no doubt he would have been
all along held up in that character, but that there
was an old grudge against the Ladies of the Pa-
lace which this affair afforded a convenient oppor-
tunity of gratifying. And to this ancient grudge
the whole of the subsequent vituperation may be
clearly traced.
It was at last determined that the state of Lady
Flora's health should be ascertained, and Sir James

Upon a dispassionate review of the whole, we can
only arrive at this conclusion--that, from the first
to the last, there is not one individual to whom a
particle of blame can be attached. The Ladies of
the Court were justified in the very slight part they
took in the affair : the grounds of suspicion were
strong and obvious : they made no actusation : the
remarks upon Lady Flora were general, natu-
ral, and, in the Court of an unmarried
Queen, not only excusable, but arising from
a deep sense of duty. Nobody was actuated
by any personal feeling against Lady Flora, and
the source and progress of the incidents were
such as must have occurred under similar circum-
stances any where else, although it is very doubt-
ful whether a similar discretion would have been
observed in other circles. S:r James Clark acted
throughout with a circumspection that cannot be
too strongly commended ; he was placed in a si-
tuation of unparalleled embarrassment ; he had, too,
a duty to perform, but it was one which the public
at large cannot fairly appreciate, and which can be
understood in all its bearings only by his own
profession ; in the performance of that duty he
could not have done less than was demanded at
his hands by his position ; and, had he turned
aside from the personally painful part of it, he
must have betrayed the high and sacred interests
which were confided to his skill and his integrity.
We now take our leave of this case we hope for
ever. Enough has been said upon all sides to
develop its history, and nothing further can be
added to it with advantage to any party. AU that
can be known is known. The Marquis of Hast-
ings h'as abundantly vindicated the honour of his
sister—if, indeed, such a vindication was neces-
sary ; and, with the explanations that have been
submitted to the public by Sir James Clark, the
discussion ought to terminate finally.

ORONER'S INQUEST.—AWFULLY SUDDEN
DEATll.—Yesterday morning an inquest was held in the
Board-room of St. Bartholomew's Hospital, before
Thomas Wakley, Esq., on the body of William Lucas.
aged 4.2. The deceased gained his living by doing por-
ters' work, and on Monday evening last, as he was pro-
ceeding along Portland-place, he was noticed to stagger
forward as if seized with giddiness, and after an ineffec-
tual attempt to support himself by catching hold of the
area railings, he fell heavily on the footway pavemeet,
and on his being raised up was found to be insensible.
He was removed to the hospital, and being placed on
a bed, he s:ghed heavily and instantly expired. Ver-
dict—Died by the visitation of God.
CHILD-DROPPING.—On Tuesday atternoon an
inqae:-.t was held before Mr. Higgs, at the Coach and
Horses, Flood-street, Westminster, on the body of a
fall-grown and new-born female infant, which was found
on Sunday morning last, sown up in two pieces of car-
petting, and exposed, laid on a bit of plank, in some
waste ground in the possession of Mr. Mann, of the
Vauxhall Bridge-road. Police constable 158 B, proved
the finding of the body, but said he could obtain no
clue to its parents, or to the persons who had exposed
it. Mr. J. Wright, surgeon, was of opinion the child
had breathed for a few minutes, but he was unable to
say whether it had died from natural causes or not. The
Coroner expressed his horror at the frequent exposure
of children under the same circumstances, and said that
if the parish would print and placard notices, he would
himself offer five pounds for the detection of the guilty
parties. He requested the beadle to mention his offer
to the proper authorities. Verdict—Found dead."
SERIOUS COACH ACCIDENT.—On Saturday
evening a serious accident happened on the Uxbridge
road, between Hanwell and Southall, to Nash's Ux-
bridge coach. As it was returning from town, between
seven and eight o'clock, it was most wantonly run against
by a broad-wheeled waggon, which was coming along at
a rapid rate, by which the axtletree of the coach was
broken and the wheel torn off. Mr. Nash, who was
driving, and an outside passenger, were thrown with
great violence to the ground, and were much hurt. The
horses immediately took fright, and
the coach for a distance of upwards of a mile before
they were stopped ; but the inside passengers, although
alarmed, escaped injury, and the whole ultimately reached
r
Uxbridge in postchaises. gallopped off with

_ .
1 THE LATE MURDEROUS ATTACK UPON
THE POLICE AT WALTHAMSTOW.---At the Word
Petty Sesions on Tuesday Frederick ILigger, aged 20,
attired in the garb of a labourer, and Wmn .aiHcalagrggeer,oat.
sailor, were brought up for final examination under a
strong escort of police from Ilford Gaol, o
committing a murderous assault upon the police of that
neighbourhood, by which the lives of James Reynolds
and William Laurence were in imminent danger, the
particulars relating to which appeared in this journal of
the 3.4. inst. After a brief examination, J. Fansl,
Esq., the Chairman, remarked that it was one of the
most brutal outrages that it had over been his lot to hear.
tt
dof
beo r
The lives of the unfortunate men were nr h
yetocootungsul t e
out of
jeopardy, and he thought such behaviour
made an example of. The bench having
a few minutes together, the prisoners were full com-
mitted
There to Ni
is
wngoa%rowing tvc for
ro trial. y
g
in the garden of Mr.
Bentley, of Aston, near Oswestry, a splendid dahlia
(. the Countess of Liverpool"), which is nearly ten feet
high, and has thirty-five blooms!
......_____

" The effect of the practice complained of must be
either to drive the bachelor husbandmen from their na-
tive land in sheer disgust at the gross injustice with
which they have been treated, or to prompt them to
early and imprudent marriage in relief from that
heavy discount upon their industry to which as
bachelors they have been most unwisely subjected.
In the one case, the farmers lose their best men ; in
the other, they make premature provision for a pauper
population !"
The practice, we suspect, both deprives the
farmers of their best men and adds to the pauper
population. We have heard it frequently remarked
that the best labourers have every where availed
themselves of the advantages held out by rail-roads
and public works, and that the difference in appear-
ance between the labourers left in the villages and
those employed on public works is so great that they
hardly appear to belong to the same country. At
the same time, the numbers remaining at home are
still sufficient to produce the results which enable
the farmers to dictate their terms to the labourers.
One can easily understand from Mr. Acland how
Sussex, and the part of Kent bordering on it,
should have been the native country of Swing.
Some of the details furnished by Mr. Acland re-
specting the items which constitute the expenditure
of a labourer's family will serve to show what a deep
interest he has in those high prices of food, which
we are exultingly told, at the agricultural meetings,
enable the farmer to remunerate him in an adequate
manner. Out of the total expenditure of a man,
his wife, and three children, in the neighbourhood
of Uckfleld, amouLting, including rent, to 12s.
weekly, the flour alone ( seconds), five gallons at
Is. 5:1., or I Is. 4d. the bushel, forms an item of no
less than 7s. ld. The poor wretch who receives
in all only 12s. (more than the average of wages)
has not a farthing remaining to expend on clothing
or butcher's meat. Now, let us suppose the flour
at 10d. the gallon, lie would reduce his expense for
this article to 4s. 2d., giving him 3s. a week for
clothing and butcher's meat.
The labourer, however, is not such a fool as
the Duke of Buckingham and Sir James Graham
take him to be. He remembers well that it was
during the period of agricultural distress, as it was
called (though it was only the distress of the
'squire), that the bones of his children's cheeks be-
gan to be well covered with flesh. Agricultural
prosperity is always associated in his mind with
the idea of pinched bellies. In fact, the poor
creature must be little elevated above the condition
of the brutes that perish, if he do not mark that
the seasons which fill the mansion of the 'squire
with festivity, are to him seasons of suffering and
privation.

With the exception of the hand-loom weavers,
all classes of workmen in towns are unquestionably
much better off with respect to subsistent* than
the agricultural labourers. It is no doubt true that
the agricultural labourer has compensation in the
pure air he breathes, and the cheerful objects by
which he is surrounded, and that he can exist in a
state of health on a much poorer diet than is re-
quired by the inhabitants of a crowded city. But
he is far from satisfied with his lot, and has .the
feeling that he is wronged. Whenever the struggle
between the towns and the country fairly com-
mences, the Duke of Buckingham will discover
that the agricultural labourers are as much opposed
to the corn monopoly as are the inhabitants of
towns.

Again, we repeat the expression of the satisfac-
tion we feel at the appearance of these reports. It
is always well to be in possession of the facts, and
Mr. Arland seems to be thoroughly aware of the
importance of the most minute accuracy in such
matters.—Morning Chronicle.

AGRICULTURAL MEETINGS.-Our readers,
we are persuaded, do not desidcrate all the details of all
these meetings that occur daily in different parts of the
country, and will be well content simply to know that
such meetings are frequent. They will of course con-
clude that the landlords are active—not exclusively in
promoting the growth of corn, but in aiding that of
Toryism too.

THE MAIDEN QUEEN.—No female, perhaps,
ever studied variety and richness of costume more than
Elizabeth. She appeared almost every day in a dif-
ferent dress, and was so fond of clothes that she could
never part with them ; at her death she had in her
wardrobe all the different habits she had es er worn,
amounting to upwards of three thousand. Paul Hent-
zer, a German, who travelled in England in 159 E, thus
speaks of Queen Elizabeth :—" Next came the Queen,
in the With year of her age, as we were told, very ma-
jestic ; her face oblong, fair, but wrinkled. She had in
her cars two pearls, with drops ; she wore false hair, and
that red, and upon her head she had a small crown.
She was dressed in white silk, bordered with pearls of
the size of beans, and over it a mantle of black silk, shot
with silver threads. Her train was very long, the end
of it borne by a Marchioness. Instead of a chain she
had a collar of gold and jewels. Whoever speaks to her,
it is kneeling; now and then she raises some with her
hand. While we were there she gave William Siawator
her hand to kiss, sparkling with rings and jewels, a mark
of particular favour. Wherever she turned her face as
she was going along, everybody fell down on his knees.
In the antechamber petitions were presented to her and
she received them most graciously,'which occasioned the
exclamation, God save the Queen Elizabeth.' She
answered it with,' I thancke youe, myne good peupel.'"
—lnce': Outlines of English History.
On Monday last the 14th instant, a numerous
meeting of the pocket-book and leather case maker's
trade was held in the theatre of the Mechanics' Insti-
tution, Southampton-buildings, for the purpose of re-
ceiving the Report of a Committee appointed at a pre-
vious meeting, to draw up a code of laws for the go-
vernment of a Pension Society in the above trades,
the Committee
CGeemormgeitteehad Conen in thechair.
theA meeting
been readdressed in support of the objects of the Society by
Messrs. Clapham, Church, Edwards, Sharp, George,
Crouch, W. H. Watson, &c. &c. The necessity of
instituting and supporting such Societies, which by
small weekly or quarterly payments enable the work-
man to provide a pension for his old age, or for his
widow in the event of his 'v ire surviving him, was forcibly
dwelt upon by the several speakers, particularly that
now, owing to the infamous enactments of the New
Poor•law Bill there is no recourse for the aged and
infirm but the tender mercies of a workhouse bastille,
and the call thus made was most nobly responded to by
the meeting, and we are happy to state that the sub-
scription lists are filling up in a very
satisfactory manner.
Mr. George was elected to the office of Treasurer,
Messrs. Lutwycke, Edward,,, and Crouch as Trustees,
and Mr, H. Palmer, Hon. Secretary. The thanks of
the meeting were then voted to the Committee and
Chairman, who acknowlee ged the vote in a powerful
and argumentative speech., and the meeting dissolved.
SUICIDE—CORN-LAWS.—A Contemporary as-
serts that there is not, a cause more fruitful of self-
destruction than the *ignoble vanity which places in
worldly appearances its shame or its honour. And
there is warrant for the assertion. But a cause equally
productive of suicide exists in the want and misery to
which so many men are reduced by the diminished de-
mand of labour occasioned: by the Corn-laws. How
many hundreds daily seek in vain for that employment
which is essential to the subsistence of themselves and
families—and finding they cannot live in the world,'
madden, and resolve to I •emove out of it. Suicide,
and almost every crime i acideat to our unhealthy so-
cial state, may, in many in stances, be laid to the accoua' t
of the Corn-laws. Thus. crime and Corn-laws stars
in the connexion of cau'ie and effect. They • •s / layover'
demoralize, and destroy,

.~