The Sun.
London, England, 1830-04-01 00:00:00

DEPARTURES.

The Marquis of Camden, from his house in Arlington-street,
to his seat, the Wilderness, Kent; Colonel and Mrs. Hicks
Beach, from Thomas's Hotel, Berkeley-square, for Hants ;
Sir Thos. and Lady Winnington, from Hawkins's Hotel, Dover
and Alhemarle.stteets, for their seat, Stanford• Court, Worces-
tershire ; Mr. and Mrs. Ditton, from ditto, on a tour ; Major
and Miss Glover, from Morley's Hotel, Cockspur-street, on a
tour; Mr. and Mrs. Langton. in Brook-street, to their seat,
Bucks ; S. Kekewich, Esq. M.P. and Mrs. Kekewich, from the
Hyde Park Hotel, for Devonshire; Mr. and Mrs. Ainslie and
family from ditto, for Hastings.

LAND REVENUE OF THE CROWN.

CALCULATIONS RRFERRED TO BY MR. LIARVILY ON HIS

MOTION FOR A SELECT COMSIITTEE TO INQUIRE INTO
THE STATE AND MANAGEMENT OF THE CROWN PRO-
PERTY, MARCH 30, 1830.

VALUE OF THE CROWN PROPRRTY.

130 Manors and Royalties at 1,0001.
Annual Rental of Estates, 600,0001, at 25 years'

„ . .
Purchase 15,000,000 0 0
Middlesex.—Grouna Rents, 50,000/. per annum,
at 40 years' purchase 2,000,000 0 0
Rent from houses, say 20,0001. per annum, at 18
years' purchase 360,000 0 0
Vv'aste Lands in Forests, not fit for oak timber,

86,000 acres, at 51. per acre
Church Livings—say lOO,OOO 0 0
Fee-farm Rents and other improveable annual
payments in England and Wales, at least
6,0001., at 25 years' purchase
Allotments under 485 Inclosure Acts, at 5001 242,50(1 0 0
Irish Estates 2,000,000 0 0

Tot al £20,412,500 0 0

The above Estimate is exclusive of Mines of Coal and Tin and
Copper, and Royal Domains, and also of the Duchy of Lan.
caster, 3 1,0001.
Davenant, in his Treatise on the Lands of England, estimates
the Common Rights of the Crown at 300,000 acres.

LIST OF THE MINORITY
OF FORTY-SIT, WHO TOTED FOR MR. natiav's aurriow.
Althorp, Viscount
Baring, W. B.
Beaumont, T. W.
Benett, John
Bentinck, Lord G.
Birch, J.
Bernal, R.
Brownlow, C.
Colborne, N. 11.
Davies, Col.
Dawson, A.
Ducane, Peter
Dundas, Sir G.
Dundas, Hon. T.
Euston, Earl of
Ferguson, Sir R.
Gordon, It.
Graham. Sir J.
Guise, Sir W.
Honywood, W. P.
Howard, Henry
Jcphson, C. D.

Knight, IL
Lamb, Hon. G.
Lambert, J. S.
Lennard, T. B.
Lumley, J. S.
Martin, John
Macdonald, Sir J.
Monck, J. B.
Morpeth, Viscount
Palmer, C. F.
Pendarves, E. W.
Poyntz, W. S,
Price, Sir
Protherre, E.
Pusey, P.
ltickford, W.
Sebright, Sir John
Smith, W.
Townshend, Lord C.
Waithman, Ald.
Warburton,
, Whitmore, W. W.

Wilson, Sir R.
Wood, Alderman

TILE MRS.
Harvey, I). W.
Hume, Joseph

PAIRED OM
Burdett, Sir F.
Denison, W. J.
Davenport, E.
Ebrington, Viscount
Ilowick, Lord
Osborne, Lord F.
liobhouse, J. C
Marjoribanks, S.
Baring, F.
Rumbold, C. E.
Lloyd, Sir E. P.
Rowley, Sir W.
Russell, Lord John
Rainson, Sir G.
Thomson, C. P.
Wood, C.

The name of Mr. SEYMOUR, M.P. for
Taunton, was omitted in the majority on the division re-
lative to the pensions of Messrs. DUNDAS and BATJSUKST.
The same gentlerman was in the Minority on Tuesday
night.

In the majority of 139 on Sir 11. HERON'S
motion, the name of N. PALLmnt, the Member for Surrey,
n•as inserted by mistake, instead of R. PALMER, Member
for Berkshire, who voted in that majority.

It may be worth noticing that the House of
Commons is Si presrnt deprived of the services of no fewer
than the following nine Members of the Law, who are ab-
sent pursuing their professional avocations in various remote
quarters of the United Kingdom—so subordinate are public
duties held to be to private interests, and so much does it
depend on the chapter of accidents, whether, when Lawyers
are returned to Parliament, the nation will, upon any ques-
tion or at any time, hive the benefit of those peculiar re-
quisites for legislatinz, which gentlemen of that profession
seem thought by some to possess !
The Irish Solicitor-General, Mr. DonEnry.
tNN EL L Esq. (gone on
a special retainer to the Down ,
The English ATTORNEY-GENERAL (down on 3 special retainer
at the York Assizes).
The recently returned Member for Winchelsea, Mr. J. WiLLSAMs.
The Member for Milborne Port, Mr. NORTH.
The Member for Knaresborough, Mr. Brtouonast.
Mr. JOAN \NOW) the Member ror Preston.
Mr. SLANEY, the9lMCMber for Shrewsbury.
Mr. MACAULkY, the
otnie4st . Member
And last, though n
patrick Assizes.)
DANIEL
,t
Caine.
Were names of less note
to be added, the list of Lawyer-
Members who are attending at present to anything but
their Parliamentary duties would be found to be formidable
indeed I

TIFF MARKETS'.—(TiIIb DAY).
GENERAL AVERAGE PRICE OF BRITISH. CORN,
For the Week ended March 26, 1530, made rip from the Returns
ct the Inspectors in the different Claes and Towns is England
and Wales, per Imperial Quarter. • • •
425. 9d.1 Oats —21 s. 114.
Barley-295. ltki.l Rye 365. 4.1.1 Pd.
IMPERIAL AGGREGATE AVERAGES OF TUR RIX Wi;111(5 PERCRININFrs
Wheat-- 60s. 3d.1 Oats 15. 741.1 lleans—.-- 315. la.
2d.1 Rye ---- 355. id nt,

DUTIES OX FOR:ZION COSEN.

Sd. Oats - 3,11 Lk, ala M.
sarlt,y-ISs. 4d.f Rye -IFa. SM.! }',Ase 94.

IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT.

HOUSE OF LORDS-(LAST NIGHT).

Lord DITNDAS presented a petition from Guisborougl•,
in Yorkshire, praying for a revision of the penal laws.
Lord KING presented a petition from the Unitas ians of
Chiehtster, praying for an alteration in the marriage laws.

he always supposed Lady Ellenborough, when she vent to
Harley-street, went to her father's.
In answer to a question put by the Marquis of BLAND-
F•)RD, he said that he had never received any money
from Lady Ellenborough or Prince Schwartzenburg.—
Witness withdrew.
John Ward examined—He gave the same evidence as he
had given before the Lord•. He proved the fact of a lad)
coming frequently to visit Prince Schwartzenburg, whom
he afterwards, by means of her phaeton and her servant,
identified to be Lndy Ellenborough. He had seen her in
the drawing-room with the Prince, and saw hint assist in
dressing her.
Cross-examined by Dr. LUSIIINGTON—He lived a.•
butler, at No. 11, Harley-street. He was generally em-
ployed in his pantry, and after his work was done there,
he went to the front door. He saw the I,,dy go to Prince
Sehwartzenburg's between a quarter before two and four
o'clock. lie saw the Prince assisting to dress the lady
between three and four o'clock. He was then in the
drawing-room of No. 11, but he did not recollect for what
Purpose be went into the drawing-room ; when he was
Viere he went to the window, and looked into the opposite
house. He could easily see the persons there when the
middle door was open, as there was a light from the op-
posite side of the house ; there were blinds to the front
drawing-room windows, but they were only half down at
the time ; when they were down he could not see into the
opposite drawing-room ; the middle door was open when
he saw the Prince dressing the lady ; he had seen the lady
often. He knew the lady by her figure, but be did not
know she was Lady Ellenborough. He had seen her fre-
quently in her pony phaeton in Welbeck-street, in Harley-
street, in Portland-place, in Cavendish-square, and in
Wimpole-street. He admitted he could not have recog-
nised the phaeton unless it was pointed out to him, but
when he saw it at the coachmaker's he was sure it was tie
same. When he saw the Prince lacing the lady's steps
he was in the drawing-room by accident, but he had sot
seen anything pass between them before which could have
induced him to watch them. He had, however, seen them
frequently standing together at the window.
By Mr. BERNAL—He could not distinguish the face
of the lady, but he was certain she was the same person he
had seen so frequently go into the house ; he had seen her
frequently stand at the window ; he could not undertake to
swear it was the same lady, but the impression on his mind
was that she was the lady he had seen in the phaeton.
By Sir C. WETHERELL—There was no crest on the
phaeton ; lie could not have said it was Lady Ellenbc-
rough's phaeton if he had not been told so at the coach-
maker's; he never felt any curiosity to watch the Prince
and the lady when lie saw her go there so often.
By Mr. AGAR ELLIS—He had no reason to know it
was Lady Ellenborough who called so frequently on the
Prince, until he was told so in the house where he lived;
he learnt it by conversation with one of the servants ;
when he told that servant that the lady called on the
Prince every day, she said it was a falsehood, and that the
lady could not be Lady Ellenborough ; he had no other
reason to know that the lady was Lady Ellenborough, ex-
cept the information he derived from the conversation with
his fellow-servant ; it was Sir Launcelot Shadwell who
appointed him to the situation he holds in the Vice-Chan-
cellor's Court ; he was not acquainted with Sir Launeelot ;
his wife had influence with him.—(A laugh.)—He had
no communication with Mr. FreshfieW, or any other per-
son, about this business before his appointment to the
Vice-Chancellor's Court.
By Mr. HUME—It was in October last he had the
first communication with Mr. Preshfield about what he
had seen from the windows of his master's house; the
house he lived in was not immediately opposite No. 73.
The house was a little to the right, but when the doer of
the back room was open, the light behind enabled him to
see persons in the room ; the blinds on the day in question
were only half down.
By Sir H. II ARDINGE—He could not see the dress
the lady wore, nor could he identify her as the person who
rode,in the phaeton, but he repeated his impression to be
that she was the same.
By Mr. TENNYSON—He never saw any other female
go to the house of the Prince except servants, and the lady
who rode in the phaeton.
Ann Lewis, the female servant of Prince Schwartzen-
berg, was then examined by Mr. Adam—She stated that
the Prince occupied the drawing-rooms, and that the lady
visited hint two or three times a-week ; the Prince gene-
rally let the lady in, but she opened the door once. She
never saw any lady but one come to the house. The evi-
dence of this witness was precisely the sense as that given
before the Holm of Louis.
Cross-examined by Mr. AGAR ELLIS—She did not
know who the lady was.
By Mr. G. LAMB—She was told afterwards that it was
Lady Ellenborough.
James Elkington, the servant of Mr. Oswin, of Harley-
street, saw the lady come two or three times a week, and
go into the house of the Prince. The lady's visit at-
tracted his attention ha consequence of her stopping in the
pony-phaeton so frequently at the corner of Queen Ann-
street, and other places in the neighbourhood.
Cross-examined by Mr. HUME—The lady generally
stopped about twenty yards from the house ; he had seen
her stop more than a dozen times. He knew Admiral
Dicby's house, but be had never seen her go to the Ad-
miral's at any time when she stopped in the pony-gig ;he
did not think that the boy who was left in the phaeton
could see where the lady went, because the angle of the
street prevented him; he knew it was Lady Ellenborough's
phaeton from the boy and the livery.
Mr. Adam then said he should proceed to call evidence
to prove the acts of adultery committed at Wimbledon.
Mr. HUME begged that the witness Carpenter should
be recalled. In answer to several questions, this witness
stated that he had stopped with the phaeton in Harley-
street, Queen Ann-street, and various other places, and
that he had never seen Lady Ellenborough call at any
house but her father's.
William Wheel, the post-boy who drove Lady Ellenbo-
rough to the Countess St. Antonio's, at Wimbledon, re-
peated the evidence given before the House of Lords on the
subject of her being joined there by Prince Schwartzenburg.
Mr. HUME suggested the expediency of calling the
coachman to whom the groom had told the circumstances
which he had described, in order to keep up the chain of
the evidence, and to show how far Lord Ellenborough was

or was not cognizant of what all his family appeared to be
talking about.
Sir C. WETHERELL spoke to order. That would be
a subject for after consideration.
John Prior, a waiter of the George, Queen Ann-street,

and Robert Wheeler, a waiter at-Brighton, and Robert
Heppe], another waiter at Brighton, gave evidence in sub-
stance similar to that which they had given before the
House of Lords The last witness, on cross-examination
by Mr. Hume, Mr. Gordon, Sir Henry Hardinge, Esc.
stated, that he had seen the gentleman, whom he under-
stood, but whom he did not know, to be Prince Schwart-
teriburg, go into Lady Ellenborough's apartment ; that
after ten minutes he (the waiter) went to Prince Schwart-
zenlorrg's room, and found that he was not there, but
that the door was locked and the key out of it ; he also
stated that he mentioned the circumstance the next morn-
ing to Mr. Walton, and at a later period to Mr. Fresh.
field ; that there was no communication between the east
and west wing of the hotel except on the ground floor ;
that he had watched of his own accord ; that Lord and
Lady Ellenborough never re-visited the hotel.
Thomas Dunhill, hook-keeper at Marks's, the coach-
builder, and William Wheel, were then examined.
During the examination of the last witness, Mr. HUME
observed, that in the thin state of the House it was not
advisable to go on with the examination.
The CHAIRMAN observed, that at least the whole of
the evidence of the witness under examination ought to be
taken.
Another post-boy proved to having driven the Prince