The Sun.
London, England, 1863-10-01 00:00:00

POLICE INTELLIGENCE.---Sept. 30.

WORSHIP-STREET.—A WomAx's VENGEANCE.--
Emma Biggs, a respectable-looking, married woman of 30,
was charged before Mr. Leigh with the following spitefu:

assault :

One of the singularities of the case was the fact that both
complainant and defendant were in evident bad health, both
so near their confinement that they were obliged to be
seated throughout, and ono of them (the defendant), who
rested her head incessantly against the wall near her,
handed in a certificate from her medical attendant describing
his patient's confinement as certain to occur near the Ist of
November.

Mr. Vann described this as a very malicious assault, and
called Mrs. Sarah Chitty, the complainant, who stated that
she resides near the defendant, who, on the afternoon of the
12th ult., took offence at one of her children and threatened
to chastise it. The child complained to the witness, who
went to the defendant's house to remonstrate with her, on
which defendant struck at and abused her so shamefully
that she was glad to retreat to her own house. The de-

fendant, who was in a violent rage, instantly followed her,
caught her by the nape of her neck, pulled her out of her
passage and into the street, where she flung her down,
struck her, and held her while she kicked her furiously
three times in the side. She became insensible, was so
carried in-doors, where she found on coming to :her senses
that she had a large lump on the head, was confined to her
bed eight days, and had been ever since, and was now
under medical treatment.

Mr. Edward Jenkins, surgeon, was fetched to the corn

„ .
plainant, whom he found suffering from hysteria, and in
such a state that he was fearful one or more of her ribs were
fractured. Her side was swollen, three inches below the
heart there were three distinct contusions, the result of as
many blows or kicks, and even now she was labouring under
such low, nervous debility as to be in danger of premature
confinement.

The defendant declared that it was her child who had been
assaulted first, and she called two witnesses to prove an
attack upon her by the complainant, who had seized hold
of her, and scratched and torn herself and her dress.
Mr. Leigh really did not know what to do with a woman
in such a state, as, though the defendant, if confined while
in prison, would be treated with every care and kindness, a
woman might reasonably have a strong repugnance to hav-
ing her child born in a gaol. The offence, however, had been
clearly proved, and the defendant must, therefore, pay a
penalty of 10s. for the assault, 10s. Gd. for the medical testi-
mony, 108. Gd. for the attorney, and 2s. for the assault sum-
mons, or in default, undergo 21 days imprisonment in the
House of Correction.

The defendant was led out, sobbing hysterically, but ulti•
mately paid the money.

WANTED AN OWNER FOR A FOUND BANK •NOTE.-- Ca-
therine Sullivan, a respectable-looking married woman of
30, living in Pelham-street, Spitalfields, was charged before
Mr. Leigh, on remand, with having in her possession a £lO
Bank of England note, and not giving a satisfactory account
of the same. On the 10th ult, prisoner made purchases at
the shop of Mr. Hall, a draper, at 196, Whitechapel, to the
amount of £1 Is. Sd., tendering in payment the note in
question, and giving her name as Mrs. Solomon, 5, High-
street, Whitechapel. She received the change, but from
some unexplained suspicion was followed and given into
custody, on being seen to enter the house in Pelham-street,
instead of the address given by her to the tradesmen.
Mr. Vann, for the defence, declared that his client had
found the note. Not anything
was said with regard to the
false name and residence, and prisoner was remandecl.
Inspector K division,who had charge of the case,
could not now bring forward any claimant for the note, but
some undoubted witnesses as to the character of the prisoner

gavo her an excellent character for integrity and honesty,
as also her husband, who is in the employ of Messrs. Les•
chers, starch manufacturers, Whitechapel.
Mr. Leigh ordered her to be discharged.
Mr. Vann applied for the note to be given up.
The magistrate said the inspector could do so or retain it

at his option, but must of course be answerable for either
course, and the officer appeared much inclined to hold it
for the prosecution of further inquiries, finally
that ho would consider about it, and let Mr.Vann know the
result. remarking

The number of the note is 35,204 (the date is withheld
from publication.) In the middle of August last it was paid
by the Eallk of England into the National Bank, with other
moneys, making a total of £6,750, and four days afterwards
paid away upon a check for £B9, drawn by Messrs. Watt
and James, merchants, of Bristol, in favour of one Poillips.
Not any more information can be obtained respecting it.