The Sun.
London, England, 1837-03-02 00:00:00

INSURANCE COMPANIES.

256.0005 h. 61 p..ct. Scottish Union
20/. sh. 1/. pd 25s
-,502 sp. et. Hercules 100/. sh. 10/. pd 15155.
ine,ooo sp. ct. insurance Co. of Scotland, .10/. sh: all pd

all pd
50,000 (i p. ct. North British 260/• oh• 10/ pd 151.
- . . .

OM sp. et. Caledonian Fire 1001. sh. 101..1id 1610;
5,000 fi p. et. Edinburgh Life 1001. sh. 101. pd 1415 s
100,000

ISCEL NEO US.

4,810 . ..... ... FAlin. and GI as: tin. Cana1...50/. sh. all pd 921.
I)itto Allncatcd .96/. ah. all pd 651.
45,400 5 per cent. Ediiih...loint Stack Water.... 251, sh. all pd 304
Carron Iron Company ......2501. sh. all pd 461.
2,0005 h 15 per cent. Shotts Iron Fotuntery 501. sh ssl. pct 4617
.10,000 3 per cent. Edinburgh & Leith Glass 201, sh. 16L pd 7il.
4.51)0 10 per cent. Edinburgh Coal Gas 25/. sh. all pd CO/.
4,450 10 per cent. Glasgow Gas 251. sh. all pd all.
750 71 per cent. Leith Coal Ca. 2O/..h. all all 45/.
1,2011 ... Edinburgh and Dalkeith RailwAy,..so/.011 55/.
3.000 5 per.... ..cent. EqUltahle Loan Company 254 ah. 01. pd 101.

LAW INTELLIGENCE.

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, Fin. 28.
TROWER V. CHADWICK.

This was an action brought by the plaintiff to recover com-
pensation in damages for a loss which he alleged himself to
have sustained through the negligence of the defendant, which
occasioned the falling in of the arch of certain wine cellars in
Tower-street, belonging to the plaintiff, whereby wine was lost
to the value of above 500/. On the part of the plaintiff the
accident was attributed to the fact of the defendant havino-
made certain excavations at the foot of a wall adjacent to the
cellars, the arch of which, it was alleged, was thereby weak-
ened. The defence was, that the accident was not attribut-
able to the act of defendant, for that the foundation of the wall
remained to the present time in its original state, but must be
attributed to the weakening of the arch by the removal of part
of the abutments, and that the immediate cause was the falling
of a large piece of timber, for which the present defendant
was not at all liable. A great number of witnesses, consisting
chiefly of surveyors, were examined on both sides ; but their
statements were wholly at variance.

The LORD CHIEF JUSTICE summed up, and the Jury found
a verdict for the plaintiff—Damages, 3501. a

ARCHES' COURT, FEB. 28
TREVANION V. TREVANION.

This, which was originally a suit for divorce in the Consis-
tcirial Court of London, is promoted by Mr. J. C. B. Treva-
nion against Charlotte, his wife. An allegation was, in the
course of the primary proceedings, offered for admission, ex-
ceptionable to the credit and testimony of a witness named
Henry Shepherd, who had been examined on an allegation
brought in on behalf of the husband, pleading further acts of
adultery to have been committed by the wife in the neighbour-
hood of Dover. Particular parts of this allegation were re-
jected by the Learned Judge of the 'Consistory Court, and an
appeal on behalf of the husband was now entered in this the
superior Court.

'Dr. ADDAMS was heard this day on behalf of Mrs. Treva-
nion, and supported the decision of the Court below.
The COURT would take time to consider its decision.

INSOLVENT DEBTORS' COURT, MARCH 1.
Edward Kelly was opposed by Mr. WOODhOFFE on the part
of the London Marble Company, Millbank, Westminster, as
also by Mr. Edge, a lamp-manufacturer, and Mr. Phillips,
carpet-manufacturer. He was unsupported. The insolvent
had been in partnership with another person as proprietors of
" The Lounge," No. 14, Clifford-street, Bond-street, which
he said was a club-house. His debts in the aggregate were
stated at 4,6761. The debts for which he had received consi-
deration amounted to 2,1701. He had no credits or property.
The case was adjourned sine die.