The Sun.
London, England, 1839-06-19 00:00:00

PARLIAMENTARY DIVISIONS.

(From the Poles and Proceedings of the Rouse of Commons.)
TtiEsDaY, JUNE 18, 1839.
BALLOT.
Motion'made, and Question put, " That leave be given to
bring in a Bill to provide that the Votes at Elections for Mem-
bers of Parliament be taken. by way of Ballot :—(Mr. Grote :)
—The House divided :
MINORITY—AYES, 216.
Abercromby, G. R. —Stirlingshire Kinnaird, Hon. A. F.—Perth
Aglionby, H. A.—Cockennouth Lambton, H.—North Durham
Aglionby, Major F.—Cumberland Langdale, Hon, C.—Knaresto
Alcrck, Thomas—Ludlow rough
A nson,. Colonel—Staffordshire Langton, Col Gore—Somerset
-- Anson, Sir G.Liclitield Leader, J. Temple —Wt stud nst er
Archbold, Robert—Kildare Lister, E. C muffle—Bradford
Attwood, Thos.—Birmingham Lushington, Charles—AsbLnrton
Bainbridge, E. T.—Taunton Lushington, Rt. Hon. S—Tower
Baines' Edward—Leeds Hamlets
Barnard, E. G.--Greenwich Lynch, A. H.—Galway
Barron, H. W..—Waterford City Macauley, T. B. - Edinburgh
Barry, G. S.—Cork Co. M'Lcod, R.—lnverness
oeamiA 1, F. 13.—Cork McNamara, Maj. W. N.—Clare C
Bellew, R. M.—Louth M‘Taggart. John—Wigton, Foe.
Berkeley, Hon. F. H.—Bristol' Marshall, Wm.—Carlisle
Bernal, Ralph—Rochester Marslantl, Henry—Stockport
Bewes, T —Plymouth maule, ticn. Fox—Light Burghs
Blake, Martin J.—Galway alolesworth Sir William—Leeds
Blake, W. J.—Newport Murray, Ale x.—Ki ritcudbriglit
Blewitt, lieginaki—Monmouth Muskett, George A.—St. A luan'e
Blunt, Sir Charles—Lewes \ or'reys, Sir Denham—Mallow
Bodkin John James—Galway inCalleghan, Hon.C.—Dungatvan
ttowes;John—South Durham O'Connell, Daniel- Dublin
Brabazon, Sir William—Mayo Co. O'Connell, John—Athlone
Bridgeman, Hewitt—Ennis O'Connell, M. J.—Kerry
Brodie, W. B.—Salisbury O'Connell, Morgan M eath
isrotherton, J.—Salford C,'Donnell, Maurice—Tralee
Browne, 11. D.—Mayo O'Connor Don—Roscommon Co.
Bryan, Maj. Geo.—Kilkenny Co. O'lerrall, Richard M.—Kildare
',Miler, Charles —Liskeard Ord, W.—Newcastle-upon-Tyne
Bulwer, Sir E. la—Lincoln Paget, Lord Alfred—Lichfield
Buslield, W.—Bradford Paget, Frederick—Beaumar is
Butler, Hon. P.—Kilkenny Co Palmer, Charles Fyshe—Reading
Bing, Right Hon. G. 8 —Chatham Parker, John—Sheffield
Callaghan, 17.—Cork City Parnell, Sir H. - Dundee
Campbell, Sir John—Edinburgh Parrott, Jasper —Totness
Cave, Robert Otway—Tipperary Pattison, James—London
Chalmers, Patrick—lnverbervie Pechell, Captain—Brighton '
Chapman, Sir M. L.—Westmeath Pendarves, E. W.—W. Cornwall
Chester, Henry—Louth Co. Philips, Mark—Manchester
Chichester, J. P. B.—Barnstaple Phillpotts, John—Gloucester
Clay, W.—Tower Itemises Pigot, 0. it.—Clonmel
'.:live, Edward B.—Hereford Poifsonby, Hon. John—Derby
Codrington, Sir E.—Devonport Power, James—Wexford Co.
Collier, John—Plymouth Pryine, George—Cambridge
Collins, W —Warwick damsbottom, J.—Windsor
Conyngham,Lord A.—Canterbury Redington, T. N.—Dundalk
Craig, W. G.—Edinburglishire Rice, Edward Royd— Dover
Crawford, W.—London Rich, H.—Knaresborough
Currie, Raikes—Northampton Rippon, C.—Gateshead •
Dasliwood, G. H.—Wycombe Hoene, E. B.—Cork Co.
Davies, Colonel—Worcester Roche, William—Limo rick
Denison, W. J.—l, est Sussex Roche, Sir David—Limerick
Denistoun, J.—Glasgow Rundle, John—Tavistock
D'Eyncourt, Right Hon. C. T.— Russell, Lord—Tavistock
Lambeth Russell, Lord C. J. F.—Bedfordsh
Di vett, Edward—Exeter ialwey, Lieut.-Col.—Ludlow
Duke, Sir Janies—Bost,n Sanford, E. A.—Somersets hire
Duneombe, T. S .-Finsbury icholefield, J.—Birminghaua
Duisdas, C. W. D.—Flint Scrope, Poulett—Stroud
Dundas, Fred rick—Orkney Seale, Corouel —Dartmouth
Dundas, Hon. J. C.—York Sharpe, General—Dumfries
Easthope, J.—Leicestrr Shell, Richard Lalor—Tipperary
Eliot, Hon. J. E.—Roxburghshire Shelborne, Earl of—Caine
Ellice, Capt. A.—Harwicb .3.nclair, Sir George Caithness
Ellice, Edward—St. Andrew's Smith, Benjamin—Norwich
Ellis, Wynn—Leicester Somers, J. P.—Sligo
• Bile, Won—Oxford Somerville, Sir W.—Drogheda
Eustou, Earl—Thetford Speirs, Alexander—Richmond
Evans, Sir U. De Lacy—Westmin- Standish, Charles—Wigan
ster • Stanley, E. John—North Cheshire
Evans, G.—Dublin County .Stanley, W. Massey—Pontefract
Ewart, William—Wigan stanley, W. O.— A nglesea
Fielden, John—Oldham Stansfi.dd,W. R. C.— Huddersfield
Fe-iton, John—Rochdale Steuart, Robert—Haddington, Ac.
Ferguson, Sir It. C.—Nottingham Stewart, Jaincs—Honiton
Ferguson, Robert —Kirka.dy Strickland, Sir G.—W• Yorkshire
Finch, F.—Walsall Strutt, Edward—Derby
Fitzgibbon, Hon. R.—Limerick Stuart, Lord J.—Ayr
Fitzroy, Lord C.—Bury St. Edw. Stuart, Villiers—Waterford Co
Fleetwood, P. IL—Preston Style, Sir Charles—Scarborough
Fort, J.—Clitheroe I alfourd, Mr. Serjeant —Reading
(Alton, Wm. D.—Linlithgow fancied, H..W.—Banbury
Gordon, Robert—Windsor Thomson, itt. Hon. C. P.—Man-
Grattan, Henry—Meath ' chester
Grey, Sir George—Devonport Thornely,Thos.—Wolverhampton
Guest, J. J.—Mertllyr Ty dvil Froubridge, Sir T. E.—Sandwich
Hall, Sir Benjamin— Marylebone Turner, W.—Blackburn
Hallyburton, Lord D G.—Forfar Verney, Sir H.—Buckinghamshire
Harvey, D. V.—Southwark Vigors, N. A.—Carlow Co
Hastie, Archibald—Paisley Villiers, C. P.— Wolverhamptox
Hawes, Benjamin—Lambeth Vivian, Major Charles—Bodmin
lawkins, J. L—Newport, Isle ol Vivian, John Henry—Swansea
Wight Vivian, Sir R. H.—East Cornwall
.tayter, W. G.—Wells Wakleyt Thomas—Finsbury
Heathcoat, J.—Tiverton Walker, It. —Bury, Lancashire
riecmr, Cornthwaße John—Pe- Wallace, Robert—Greenock
tersfield Warburton, H.-131 idport
['Motley, Charles—Ashton Ward, H. G.—Sheffield
Flonhouse, T. Benj.—Rochester White, A ndrew—sunderland
Hodges, 'l' L.—West Kent White, Henry—Loneford
Holtman Robert—Hastings White, Lieut -Col. Saml.—Leltritu
Dorman, Edward —Coc kermouth Wilde, Mr. Serjeant —Newark
Howard, F, J.—Youghall Williams, William—Coventry
Hume, Jose,,h—Rilkently Williams, W. A.— Monmouthsh
lumphery, John—Southwark Wood, Sir Matthew—London
Hutt, W.— H ull Wyse, Thomas—Waterford
Hutton, Robert—Dublin Yates, J. Ashton .Carlow
James, William—Cumberland
Jervis, J.—Chester
Jervis, S.—Bridport
Johnson, W. Augustus—Oldham

TELLERS.
Grote, George—London
W ors ley, Lord—Lincolnshire

MAJORITY-
Acland, Sir T. D.—.N .11evonshire
Acland, T. D.— West Somerset
!'Court, Captain—Tamworth
Ad.ire, Lord—Glamorganshire
A:ford, Viscount—Bedfordshire
Alsager, B.—Surrey
Alston, Howland—Hertfordshire
Andover, Viscount—Ma linsbury
Adnithuot, General—Kincardine.
shire
Archdall, Gen. M.—Fermanagh
Ashley, Lord—Dorsetsliire
Ashley, Cooper, Hon. A. H.—Dor.
chester
Attwood, M.—Whitehaveii
Bagge, W.—West Norfolk
Bagot, Hon. W.—Denbighshire
Bailey, Joseph—Worcester
Bailey, J. ll.—Sudbury
kiaillie, H. D.—Honiton
Baker, Edward—Wilton
Baring, F. T.—Portsmouth
Baring, F.—Thetford
Baring, H. B.—Marlborough
Baring, W. B.—N. Staffordshire
l3arneby, John—Worcestershire
Barrington, Lora— Berksh, re
Bmeson, Sir it.—Londunderry
Bell, Matthew—S. Northumber-
land
Bench, J.—South Wiltshire
Bent lock, I ord G.—Lynn
Bethell, Richard -.Yorkshire
Blackstone, W. S.— Vv atlingford
Blair, J.- Wigtooshire
Blab emore, Richard—Wells
Blandford, Marquisof— Woodstock
Blennerhassetti A.—Kerry
Bo idero, Henry
Bolling, W.—Bolton
Bradshaw, James—Canterbury
Braniston, T. W.—Essex South
Broadley, Henry—East Yorkshire
Browfir,gg, J. s.—Boston
Bruce, Lord E.—Marlborough
Bruges, W. H. L.—Bath
Buck, L. W.
Buller, .E.—North Stafibrdshire
Buller, Sir J. Yarde—Devonshire
Burdett, Sir F.—N. Wiltshire
Burrell, Sir. C.— Shoreham
Durroughes, H. N.—East Norfolk
Byng, George—Middlesex
Calcraft, John Hales—Wareham
Canning, Right Hon. Sir S. -Lynn
Cantilupe, V iscount—Helston
Cartwright, Win. R.—South Nor.
thamptonshire
Castlereagh, Visct—Down Co.
Cavendish, Hon. C. C.—E. Sussex
Cavendish, Hon. 3. H.—N. Derby
Cayley, E. S.-11. Yorkshire
Chapman, Aaron—Whitby
Chetwynd, Major W.—Stafford
Childers, John W.—Malton -
Christopher, It. A.—Lincolnshire
Chute, W. L. W.—West Norfolk
,layton, Sir William—Marlow
Clive, it. H. South Shropshire
Codrington, C. W.—Gloucestersh.
Cole, Hon. ArthurH.—En niskillei,
Cole, Viscount—Fermanagh •
Colqulioun, John C.—Renfrew
Compton, H. Combe—Hampshire
Conolly, Edward M.—Donegal
Cooper, E Co.
Coote, Sir C.—Queen's County
Copeland, W. T.—Stoke.upon
Trent

-NOES, 133.
Hothain, Lord-Leomluster
Houldsworth, T.-Nottingham sh.
Houston, G. J. - Renfr ew.,hire
Howard, P. H.-Carlisle
Vi,c.-Northumberland
Hughes, W. 8.-Carnarvon
Hurt, Francis-South Derby
regestre, Viscount-Staffordshire
Ingham. obert -South Shields
Inglis, Sir R. H.-Ox. University
:rton, Samuel-Cumberland
trying, John-Antrim Co.
fackson,Mr. Serj.-Bandon fridge
!ames, Sir W. C.-Hull
elikins, Richard-Shrewsbury
erinyn, Earl-Bury, Suilblk
ohnstone. J. P -PoirtYiesshire
ones, John-Carmarthenshire
'ones, T.-Lt.ndonderry Co.
..elourne, Lord
(city, Fitzroy-Ipswich
_iemble, H.- Wt.st Ourrey
Knatchbull, Sir E.-Last Kent
Knight, H. G.-Nottinghamshire
Knightley, Sir C.-Northampton-
shire
Knox, Hon. Thomas-Dungannon
Lasceiles, Hon. W. S.-Wakefield.
Law, lion. C. E.- CanibridgeUni v.
Lefroy, itt. Lion. T.-Dublin Uni-
versity
Lemon, Sir Chas.-W. Cornwall
Lennox, Lord A.-Ch ic h ester
Leveson, Lord-Morpeth
Lidded, Hon. H.-North Durham
Lincoln, Earl of-SoUth Notts
Litton, Edward-Coleraine
Lockhart, M.-Lanarkshire
Long, W.-North Wiltshire
Lowther, Colonel-Westmorelark
Lowther, Visct.-Westmoreland
Lowther, J. H.-York
Lygon, Major-Gen. Hon. H. 8.-
Worcestershire West.
Mackenzie, Thomas-Hess-shire
Mackenzie, W. F.-Peeblesshire
Mackinnon, W. A.-Lymington
Maclean, Donald-Oxford
Mahon, Viscount- Hertford
Maidstone, Visct.-N. Northantp.
tonshire
Manners, Lord C. S.--Leicestersh.
Marslanci, Thomas-Stockport
Marton, Geo.-Lancaster
Master, Colonel-Cirencester
Matthew, G. 8.-Shaftesbury
Maunsell, T. P -Norttiampt • nsh.
Meynell, Captain H.-Lisburne
Mildmay, P. St. John -Winches-
ter
Miles, William-Somersetshire
Miles, Philip W. Skynner-Bristd
Miller, W. H.-NewcaStle under.
Lyme
Mimes, It. M.-Pontefract
Mordaiint, Sir Jobn-Warwicksh
Moreton, A. H.-Gloucestershire
Morgan, C. M. R.-Brecon
Neeld, Joseph-Chippenharn
Neeld, John-Cricklade
Nicholl, J -Carditt
Noel, 'William 3E-Rutland
Sorreys, Lord-Oxfordshire
Ossulston,Lord-NorthNorthum-
berland
lOwen, Sir J.-Pembrokeshire
Packe, C. W.-Leicester, South
. Pakington, J. S.-Droitwich
Palmer. Robert-Berks
Palmerston, Viscount-Tiverton
Parker, Montagu-Devon
Parke,, R. T.-Preston
Parker, 'l'. A. W.-Oxfordshire
P..tten, J. Wilson-Lancashire
Peel, Rt. Hon. cir R.-Tamworth
Peel, Col. Jonathan-Huntingdon
Pemberton Thomas-RiponPerccval, j. G. West Surrey
Philipps' Sir 11-Haverfordwest
Pigot, Robert -Bridgnorth
Planta, Joseph-Hastings
Plumptre, John -East Kent
'Polhill, Frederick-Bedford
Pollen, Sir J.-Andover
Pollock, Sir F.--Huntingdon
Colonel. -Cardiganshire
l'uwerseourt, Viscount-Bath
Praed, W. Ives
Price, Sir R.-Herefordshire
Price, Richard-New Radnor
Pringle, Alexander-Selkirkshire
Pusey, Philip-Berkshire
Rae, Right lion. Sir Wm.-Bute
;telt', Sir J. Rae-Dover
Rice, V S.--Cambrhlge
Richards, Richard-Merionethsh.
Itiekford, W.- Aylesbury
Rolfe, •it it, M.-Penryn •
Rolleston, Col.-S. Nottingham
Round, ('harles Gray-Essex N.
Round, John-Maldon
Rumbold, C. E.-Yarmouth
ituslibrooke, Colonel--Sufiblk
Rushout, Geo. Bowles-Evesham
Russell, Lord John-Stroud
Sanderson, Richard-Colchester
S.indon, Lord-Liverpool •
Scarlett Hon. J. Y.-Guildford
Seymour, Lord-Totness
Shaw, Rt. Hon. F.-Dublin Univ.
Sheppard, '1 homas-Frome
Shirley, E. J -Warwickshire
Sibthorp, Colonel-Lincoln
Stoney, It. A.-Shrewsbury
Smith, Abel-Hertfordshire
Smith, Hon. R.-Wycombe
Smyth, Sir G. H.-Colchester
Somerset, Lord G.-Moinnouthsh.
Spencer, Hon F.-Midhurst
Spry, Sir S. I'. Bodmin
Stanley, Edward-Cumberland
Stanley, Lord-North Lancashire
Staunton, Sir George 'llion:las
Stewart, John-Lymington
Stock, Dr.-Cashel
Stormont, Viscount-Perthshire
Start, Henry Chasi-Dorsetshire
Sugden, Sir E.-Ripon
Surrey, Earl of-West Sussex
Talbot, C. R. 151.-Glamorgansliire
feigninouth, Lord-Marylebone
I'ennent, J. E.-Belfast
Thomas, Colonel-Kinsale
'hornbill, G.-Huntingdonshire
lownl4, R. G -Cambridgeshire
french, Sir F.-Scarborough
Turner, Edmund-Truro
Tyrrell, Sir J. T.-North Essex
Vere, Sir C. 13.-East Suffolk
Verner, William-Armagh Co.
Vernon, G. H.-East Itethird
Villiers, Viscoun,-Weymouth
Vivian, John Ennis-Truro
Waddington, H. S.-West Sullbik
Wall, C. Baring-Guildford
Walsh, Sir John-Sudbury
We!by, Glynne Earle-Grantham
Whitmore, T. C.-Bridgenorth
Wilbraham, George-Cheshire
Williams, Robert-Dorchester
Williams, T. Peers-Marlow
Wilmot, Sir J. E.-Warwickshire
Wilshere, William-Yarmouth
Winnington, T. E.-Bewdley
Wodehouse, Edmund-Norfolk
Wood, Charles-Halifax
Wood, Colonel T.-Brecon
Wood, Thomas-Middlesex
Wrightson, W. B:-Northallei ton
Wyndham, Wadham-Salisbury
Wynn, Right Hon. C. W.-Mont.
gomeryshire
Yorke. lion. E.
-Cambridgcs h
Young, John-Cavan
Young, Sir W.-Bucks

Corry, Hon. H. L.—Tyrone Co.
Courtenay, F.—Bridgewater
Cowper, W. F.—Hertford
Cresswell, Cresswell—Liverpool
Dalrymple, Sir A.—Brighton
Ua „er, Hon. 0.-I'ortarlington
L,arby, George—East Sussex
Darlington, Earl of--Shropshire
De Horsey, S. H.—Newcastle.
under Lyme
Dick, Quentin—Ma!don
D'lsracii, B.—Maidstone
Donkui, air R.—Sandwich
Douglas, Sir C. E.—Warwick
Dowdeswdl, \V.—Tewkesbury
Duffield, I homas— Abingdon
Dugdale, %V. S.—Warwickshire
Dunbar, George—Belfast
Duncombe, Hon. W.--lorkshire
i)uncombe, Hon A.—Ea,t lietforC
Dungannon, Lord—Binhani
Du Pre, George—Buck
East, James Buller— Winchester
Eaatnor, Viscount—lle-gate
Eaton, IL J.—Cambridgeshire
Egerton, W. 'Patton—Cheshire
Egerton, Sir P.--Cheshire
Egerton, Lord F. L.—Lancashire
Eliot, Lord—East Cornwall
Jno.—Newry
£stcourt, 'l'. G. B.—Oxford Univ.
Estcourt, T. Junior—Devizes
Farnham, E.ll.—N. Leicestershire
Farrand, Robert—Stafford
Fazakerley, J. N.—Peterborough
Feilden, W. J.—Blackbnrn
Fector, John folinet—.Maidstone
Fellowes, Edw. Huntingdonshire
Ferguson,Sir It. A.—Lon:louden)
Filmer, Sir K—West Kent
Fitzpatrick, J, W —Queen's Co.
Fitzroy, Hon. Henry—Lewes
Fleming, John—Hampshire
Foley, E. 7—Herefordshire
Forester, Hon. ,I.—Wenlock
Fremantle, Sir Thomas—Bucks
French, F.—Rosscommon
Fre difield, James Wm.—Penryn
Gaskell, James Millie's— ‘Venlock
Gladstone, W. E.—Newark-on-
Trent
Glynne, Sir S. R.—Fiintshire
Goddard,Ambrose—Cricklade
Godson, IL—Kidderminster
Gordon, lion. W.—Aberdeenshire
Gore, 0. J. R.—Carnarvonshire
Gore, Ormsby—Salop
Goulburn, Right Hon. H.—Cam
bridge Univer,ity
Graham, Right Hon. Sir J. R. G
BL—Pembroke
Grant, F. W.—lnverness-shire
Greene, T. G.—Lancashire
Grimsditch, T.—Macclesfield
Grimstow, Viscount—Hertford.
shire
Grimston, Hon. E. H —St. Al.
.ban s
Grosvenor, Lord R.—Chester
Hale, B. IL—Gloucestershire
Halford, Henry—Leicestershire
Handley, Henry—Lincolnshire
Harcourt, G. G. V —Oxfordshire
Harcourt, 0. S.—Bucks
Hardinge, Right Hon. Sir H.—
Launceston
Harland, William e.—Durham
Haw kes, Thomas—Dudley
Hayes, Sir E.—Donegal
Heathcote, Sir G.—Rutland
Heathcote, Sir Hampshire
Heathcote, G. J.—Lincoinshire
Heneage, Edward—Grimsby
Heneage, G W.—Devizes
Henniker, Lord-i-East Suffolk
Hepburn,Sir T. —Haddingtonshire
Herbert, Hon. S.—South Wilts
[ferries, Rt. Hon. J. C.—Harwich
Hill, Sir Rowland—Shropshire
Hillsborough, Earl of—Down
Hinde, J. Hodgson—Newcastle-
upon-Tyne
Hodgson, Frederick—Barnstaple
Hodgson,.lld.—Berwick.on-Tweed
Hogg, James Weir—Beverley
Holmes, Hon. W.—lsle of Wight
Holmes, W.—Berwick-onTweed
Hope, Charles—Linlith gowshire
Hope, H. T.—Gloucester
Hope, G. W.—Weymouth

TELLERS.
Clerk, Sir G.—Stamford
Sni.th, It. V.—Northampton

DANISH CL 41111 S.

Motion made, anCIQu-es—tion put, " That an humble Address
be presented to her Majesty, praying that her Majesty will be
graciously pleased to direct the Commissioners to whom it was
referred to examine the claims of certain British subjects, in re-

spect of losses sustai
the Danish Governn
tl e cairns which the
made a Report to t
(Mr. Creswell : )"
MA
Alston, Rowland.
A ttwoesi, Al.

Bagge, wm:
Barnard E. U.

Ball, N.
Bentinck, Lord G
Berkeley, F. H.
Bethell

Blackett, C.
Blenncrhassett, A.
Bodkin, John James
Boldero, Henry G.
Boiling, W.
Bram,ton, T. W.
Bromley, Henry
Bruges, W. H. L.
Bt y eorge
Buller, C.
Burroughes, N. N.
Rusfeild, William
Butler, Colonel
Cavley, E S.
Chapman, A.
Christopher, R. A.
Chutr, W. L, w,
Collier, J.
Craig, W
Darlington, Earl of
D ughs Sir C. E
I .trie, gir James
Donda3, W. D.
Dui:gantinn, Lcrd
Eaton, Richard J.

Baring, F. T.
Brodie, W. B.
Br .the:ton, J.
Bulwer, Sir E. L.

Clernenis, Lord
Divett, E.
Eliot, Lo.d

Goulimrn, H.
Grey Sir G.
Hodges, T. L.
Howie k. Lord
Melgu,d, L)rd

fined by the seizure of ships and cargoes by
neat in 1807, to proceed to aejudicate upon
ey have received, and upon which they have
the Lords of her Majesty's Treasury :”---
-The House divided :
kJORITY—AYES, 94.
Ellis, John Molesworth, Sir W.
Feiloen, \V. Ord, W.
Fielden„l. Philips, M.
Fitzroy, Hon. H. Phillpotts, John F.
Gasket!, J. M. Plumptre, J. P.
Goddard, Ambro.so Polhill, Frederick
Grote, G. Pryme, G.
Hawes, B. • Round, C. G.
Henniker, Lord Round, John
Horde, J. H. SAndon, Lord
Hodgson, Richard Seholefield, J.
Hogg, J. W. &rope, G. P.
Holmes, W. A'Court Sieppard, Thomas
Horsman, E !ward Sibthorp, Colonel
Houston'', G. Smyth, Sir G. 11
Howard P. H. Somerville, Sir W. Hume,Joseph Staunton, Sir G. T.
Hutt, W. Strickland Sir G.
Hutton, Robert Stuart, Lord James
Inglum, Robert Style, Sir Charles
Inglis, Sir It. H. Talfourd, T. Noon
James, Sir Walter I Thompson, W.
Ke.ly, Fitzroy Vigors, N. A.
Remote, Henry Vivian, J. E.
Knatchbull, Sir L. Wakley, Thomas
Lambton, H. Warburton, H.
Langdale, Hon. C Ward, H. G.
Lascelles, W. S. White, A.
Lefroy, t 'r. T. 1 Wodehouse, Hon. E.
Liddell, H. I'.
Mackenzie, Thomas
Marsland, T.

INORITY-NOES,
Milues, R. M.
Parrott, J.
Pusey, Philip
Rice, T. S.
Rolfe, Sir It. M.
Russell, Lord John
San cord, E. A.
Seymour, Lord
Sharpe, General
Slaney, It.
Smith, IL Vernon
Stock, Dr.

TELLERS.
Cresswell, C.
Wilmot, Sir E.

32. •
Tancred, H. W.
Troubridge, Sir T.
Wilbraham, G.
Williams, W. A.
Wood, Colonel T.
Worsley, Lord
Wynn, C. W.
Yates, John A.

TELLERS.
Maule, Hon. tOR
Wood, C.

MEETING AT EXETER HALL
TO PETITION AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT
PLAN OF NATIONAL EDUCATION-PUGILISTIC
CONTEST BETWEEN THE EARL OF WINCHIL-
SEA AND MR. CAMERON.

A meeting having been advertized to take place at Exeter
hall, this day, for the purpose of taking into consideration the
Pr)priety of_petitioning Parliament against "the Popish and in-
fidel scheme of National Education," at about twelve o'clock
the large room was thrown open, and by about one o'clock it
was little more than half filled. At that hour a gentleman
rose and proposed that the Earl of Winchilsea do take the
chair, and the Earl of Winchilsea proceeded to instal himself in
the office of Chairman without the question having been pro-
pcsed to the Meeting for their approbation. On this,
Mr. J. SAVAGE rose to propose that Mr. Cameron do take
the Chair, as we understood, and hereupon a scene of confu-
sion and uproar ensiled which beggars description. Shouts of
app.ause and disapprobation rent the air. The police were
ordered to remove Mr. Savage from his station, but were
driven back by his friends, who, having gained possession of
a:portion of the platform were proceeding to place Mr. Came-
ron in the Chair, when the Earl of Winchilsea advanced
to that gentleman and struck him a blow with his
clenched fist. His Lordship, however, was then speedilY
floored by those who surrounded Mr. Cameron. The
police having obtained a reinforcement re-appeared on the plat',
form, and proceeded to remove Mr. Cameron and hi; friends vi
et armis; having accomplished which, the Earl of Winchilsea
commenced his address to the meeting, and the business wes
proceeding quietly and regularly at the time our reporter left.
In the course of his address the Noble Earl, alluding to the in-
terruption which had taken place, stated, that it might have
arisen from those persons fancying this was a public meeting,
whereas it was a private one. The meeting was very scantily
attended, and of those present at least two-thirds were ladies.

EXCHEQUER COURT-THIS DAY'

IRWIN V. LIIXMORE.—EItEACIF OF PROZ,IISE OF MARRIAGE'
Mr. V. LEE stated this case to the hwy. The plaintiff was
the daughter of a large merchant, who,
along with his wife,
-left her and three other sisters at an early age, with a compe-
tency. They resided at Barnstaple of which parish the de-
fendant was Vicar.. He had formerly 'been Curate of the parish*
and while filling that office he made the acquaintance of the
plaintiff in a manner which would he developed in the evidell°.
For a long series of years he had cultivated her acquaintance,
and made her a promise of marriage, which he had evaded
upon one plea or another until 1837, when he was married to
a nether. Such a shock had this proved to the plaintiff that she
was now on a bed of sickness. This case was brought far theist-
jury done to her character, and in order to set it right with
the world, as the conduct of the defendant would tend to throw
a slur upon her, as the engagement between the parties Rag
well known, it having lasted for the lengthened perigd a 12
years. He did not expect that he would have an opportunity
of addressing them again, as his Learned Friend (11r. The-
siger)would be contented to trust to his eloquence to mislead the
Jury. He trusted, however, they would pay attention to, and
decide the case upon the facts he would prove before them in
evidence. He then called
Miss Grace Irwin, the sister of the plaintiff, examined by Mr;
LEE. In 1825 was living with her sister. Her father and
mother were dead. The defendant was curate of the parish of
Barnstaple, in Devon. One Sunday in April, 1625, after leas,
ing church they met the d- fendant, who gave her sister a letter,
and begged her to read that. The sisters were about leavieig
for France, but before they went away they received euather
letter for her sister from Mr. Luxmore; it was read, It was
one of the usual character, and begging for a lock of her hair
as a keepsake, and begging her to be secret and true, and to
seek the blessing of Him above upon their loves. Another,
dated 27th June, 1827, was put in and read, in which he said
he had not forgot, and never could forget her, but there were
difficulties in the way. They returned from France in June,
18?8, and the defendant had many interviews with plaintiff.
A Mr. Brizley came to Barnstable, and in consequence of some-
th;ng that took place, the defencani requested an interview,
but he requested it should be a private one, and witness did not
hear what took place. They lived in Barnstable up till 1836,
and were constantly together, walking out sometimes as often
as five times a day. In 1836, the sisters visited their brother
in London, and in consequence of being told that Mr. Lux.
more was engaged to another, they left town suddenly and re.
turned to Barnstaple in February, 1836. Her sister wrote to
him stating the report she had heard, and recalling to his me-
mory the relation in which they had stood towards one another
for many years, saying "she thought her happiness safe, trust-
ing, as she did to a man of honour, and depending upon
the word of a servant of God." That letter was returned in
a note from the defendant to the effect " That Mr. Lux-
more was astonished that after the lapse of so miny years Miss
Irwin should renew the subject, as he hail long ago ex-
pressed himself so decidedly upon it. He requests that he
may receive no more communications upon the matter.'
After that a clergyman named Dean called upon them on the
part of the defendant. Some days after defendant requested an
interview ; no answer was returned, but in a few days he walked
into the room and asked for a glass of water, and begged to be
allowed to sit down. Her sister said, "Are not twelve years of
torture sufficient for you, that you come here to insult me? Do
you not recollect the last time wewere alone that you solemnly
called God to witness that if ever your sentiments changed you
would write to me? Did you ever fulfil your promise ?" He said
he never did ;ire could not snake up his mind to hurt her ieelinr,
besides you were some years in London. Her sister seia she
was only there for eight months. He said his memeey was very
bad. "Did you tell Mr. Dean that you had sent back my let-
ter ?" " I did," said the defendant. Mr. Dean said tip& he
had done very wrong. He asked if she had destroyed his first
letter. Her sister sail she had, and that was an epitome of her
whole conduct towards him. He said there was nothing im-
proper in plaintiff's letter, but he had sent it back, because hews
mad for some days. He begged for forgiveness, if not for his
sake for the sake of an aged father, on the brink of the grave—
sisters and brothers who had never offended her—she refused.
He said, if she wished to separate hint from that being to eh"'
he was now engaged to, he said nothing on earth would do 551
he had told her all, and she was willing to run all risks. P;
verty and disgrace, for he would incur the auger of
all his friends. She upbraided him for his conduct
as she had been deprived of her natural protector. He said be
was most repentant. She said the fruits of it were selfishness,
for he had come there merely for the purpose of securing bis
own happiness, but he would one day wake from the dream,
and remorse would follow. Ile said he felt it already; he
wished he might die that night be had never loved any but
her, but it was too late then; and lae begged her forgive-
ness, for the sake of the Church. He asked to see the,
letters he had written to her, for he knew not how unguarded
he had been ; but he observed witness was present. If she
would not show them to him would she show them to Admiral
Dubourg. She refused. lie then begged for a line of for-
giveness, and then he must take the consequences. She said
she was relentless, and he then left the room.
Cross-examined by Mr. THESIGER—She and her sisters
kept lodgings in Barnstaple. Her parents died in 1844. Her
father was a large corn-merchant. After his death her sisters •
kept a school for a short time, but gave it up when they came
of age and found they could live upon their income. Defendant
had been Vicar of Barnstaple since 1827. Her sister was now
44 or 45 years of age, but she was younger than Mr. Luxmore.
She had heard that he was older. Her sister was 29 when de-
fendant first commenced his addresses. They were three years
in Fiance, and defendant only wrote once; he promised to
write oftener, but did not. They saw him on their return to
Barnstaple. He called at their lodgings when he and her sister
had fallen out; at other times they were always walking.
It was admitted that the defendant was married on the 7th of
June, 1838, and the writ issued on the 12th of June.
Mr. Tesesioeit addressed] the Jury for the defendant, who
was actuated by no feeling but that of respect towards the
plaintiff, and, accordingly, he (Mr. Thesiger) was instructed
to conduct his case in such a manner, as to throw not the slight-
est shade of suspicion upon her character. The plaintiff's
Counsel said the action was not brought for the purpose of oh-
tainir, damages ; what then was the object ? Was it to gra-
tify the feelings of disappointment which now actuated her' as
knowing the pain it must give the defendant, and the herell
might do him was the object to frighten him into offering age.
of money for preventing the case front coming before the Put";
It was a harsh and unfeeling course of conduct towardatbe
Lt
de-
fendant, yet he felt the utmost respect for her, and he thought
the casenever would have been brought forward, had it not been
for ill advice. After commenting upon the evidence he said,
the case was one of the most extraordinary he bad ever-seen.
The supposed courtship had been carried on in the must cool
and calculating manner, and for an extraordinary time.
debe First
9t
of all, the plaintiff agrees that the whole matte.: s
arrived
at the
a secret from defendant's family, she then
ftaomliry,7,evneeritlintentions of the defen-
dant s
aal k
gffearse difference,
asan
mature age of 29. Again, during the whohleapinegriod from 1828
that he never called
dant ; and another extraordinary thing wa
insisteder theupon plaintiff
k knowing the
brother,nor any .f her
and as
soon as that was made up, awaythey
could—five times a day—the same es. s at.
-at their lodgings, except when
they
yghowwl
( aughter.)
He had given her cause to think that if he
t e t h's
whole time.
There was no engagement that was binding in law during the
b hurt he went to her to beg her for-
ever did marry the would be 'the object, and fancying that
giveness for any pp conduct n conduct might have
her feelings
He contended that the defendant was entitled
caused her.
but should the jury think otherwise they were
to a verdict,
net to pun
ish but to give compensation. Now what bad she
I,st. It was evident that she had not even a lingering gs might e
af-
fection for the defendant, whatever respect he might have
for her, he could have no affection—then she had lost the
chance of a life of the utmost misery by a union without
affection. She herself said, through her Counsel, that she
did not come* for damages—she only came to vindicate her
eharacter. No one had ca3t the slightest imputation upon
her, so that she went out of Court with the full and entire
respect of the defendant.
The Learned JUDGE read over.and commented on the evi-
dence anti the letters in the cause. He confessed that they
had made an impression on his mind that there had been no
positive engagement ; he thought there were strong expres-
sions of attachment, and upon a change of circumstances it was
likely there might be a connection formed. If the Jury thought
there had been a positive promise of marriage they would find
for the plaintiff, but under all the circumstances he did not
think it was a case for heavy damages.
The Jury retired, and after being out for a quarter of an '
hour, returned with a verdict for the plaintiff--4001. damages. -