The Sun.
London, England, 1806-08-11 00:00:00

Court 4,l*6re :ttvzi);t.ciPen toe the rich, Le-
catte they cOulaTay..r.for_ the !,‘-c.ess to them which
ciaiFti.Cl i what si:nat it;il,llOwer,•ttiust the
Nor stftnd,'il, iit a:ldition to the disalvantageS uniier
which they .At -present laboured, .their AttOrtrev had
to speculate on the chAnce'of being subjected to the
costs, to which they, from A . mis-representation of.
their ease might live iilducfi:d him to subjea the.
adverse party ? .His LOrdship; therefore, ~supers-
eded the Commission, at the expence of Hibbert,
lutr, and Ogden ; rejefßing the application as to
Barlow, but giving it. tb be understoOd that he
should not be.entitled, out of the ikinkrupt Funds,
to thc costs .f the Cur mission, so far as expended
by him, but that, if already paid, that sum inlitt be
restpred, it being necessary to give sothe.check to
such proceedingS.
Ex Piffle GENT,. imike,Matier efßittEßzDoa.

This was an application- or• a similar rfatar., hi
which Mr-Aryowsmith was the .Solicitor.` against
whom, as well ag against- Berbridge the Bantrupt;
Watts, the Peetioning Credifor, and Walsh, wiel
had fraudulently joined ;vith,Bethridge and Watt 4
in a conspracy to take out the Commission, the ex=
pences,of the Proceedn4;s were cra,..ed.
• l'lit SoLttirott-GENAL. and Mr...Gtumwooe
stated, that.in a dui-Lim' to t ho.features in the Idr-tiler
caie,. sonic ad:atonal circumstances here cccurred
against Soliciter, Mr. Arrowstnitit.: The person
who introkeed to him ,Watts, the Petitioning Credi-
for, was John Walsh.) who had tortnerly been con-
vhtcd of perjury; and had stood in the' pillOry. The
same perSon,..uncler the name of Joseph
Arro w smith had also appointed Nessenger to take
care of the Bankrupt's effects : and he had.also been
Attorney 'and Witness fur Berbridge andlWalsh in,
an Indietment, against-them for a cOnSPiracy to take
out the Comthission, in.'hich it was shewn.that df

the Petitioning Creditor's debt;,arnonnting to IQOI.
01. had been paid impart. An additional complaint
existed against the Solicitor in. this Case.. -By LoM
Reslyn's Order two B,arristerS wereyequired to be
inserted in every Commission.. Here only one Law-
fer was nominated.
The Loon- CH A NCELI,OR expreed himself in si7
milar
.terms to what he had done in the course of
the •former case ; declaring it
.to be his Wi.shr that
some pro,speaive'rule. could b 6 laid down similar to
thzit which he had delivered yesterday. Before .13,= laid
down such rule however, 'he mit* consult witli
those persons, note alive, .who. had formerly sat is
that Chair, and v.-ich those Connsel, praaising ih the
Court, most conversant in E:iitkirs of tj,c kind. Ott

the last-mentioned 'ground, however, namely, a
:bre.?:ch of the Or(12i• of the Court, could not
be clisrensed witholit s'pecial authority to
7-that etfeC.t, he hal no heSit2tiop in finding.
ro:A-smith liA)le, in this case, in the expences of: the
proceecang3.
Ex parte JusTIGE: in the Matter of CLINTNIT.:GIIAir.
The deIiERAL appeared in support of
the PetitiOn, w'hich rested on .these grounds—That
Cunningham was not a horse-dealer, and subject to
the Badkrupt Laws, but: . Attorney,. and. that
the debt said to be due to .the 'Petitioning- Creditor
was not a real debt. .The Petioner would have
Made an earlier application, but the fvinkrupt had
left the Country in the year 1795, add did not return
till 1805. •

Mr: ATTORNEY GENERAL' did not see that the
compulsory voyage made-7 15y - the Bankrupt was
any ex.cuse for the Petitionex delaying his applica-
tion from the. year 1790 to the present year; being 16,
years.

The Application seerning.to be acceded to by the
Counsel ,for M. Cunningham, who, the Loan"
CHANCELLOII observed, was himself in Court, and
had .notinstriaaed.his Counsel to repel, with suffi-
cient spirit, the charge of fraud alledged against
hiM-;—hii Lordship. ordered, that justice might
not be impeded-to other parties before the' Court,
that this business, already so very sjale, should lie
over till he' had got to the end of the Bankrupt Pe-
tions.

It was Lord Kinnoull's acid not Lord Kinnaird's
carriage that• was robbed 'of-the trunk pn the North
Road, as stated in'Saturday's Paper.