The Sun.
London, England, 1837-10-10 00:00:00

LoNDoN, TURSDAY EVENING, OCTOBER, 10, 1,‘,137

his Day, Vol. X. of
THE POCKET EDITION OF BYRON
NOW COMPLETE, in TEN VOLUMES, -
With Ftetilistaco, N. eftels, neatly bound and gilt.
Vol. I. Contains CHILDE HAROLD.
Vols. 11. and 111. „ TALES.
Vols. IV. and V. „ DRAMAS.
Voss. VI. VII. and VIII. „
Vols. IX. and X. „ DON JUAN.
Any Volume may be had separately.
John Murray, Albemarle-street.

Now ready, in 2 vols. pest Bvo.,

TORIES OT SPXNISH LIFE
Edited by

Lieutenant-Colonel CRAUFIAD, Grenadier Guards.
" These volumes are a welcome and valuable addition to Englisl
literature—giving by far the best view of Spanish life we have ye'
met with. "—Spectator.

This day, in Bvo., price Is.,
THOUGHTS on the EVILS of a SPIRIT 01
CONQUEST, and on SLAVERY.
Being a Letter on the annexation of Texas to the United States,
By DR. CHANNING.
In INno., price Sixpence,
RICH ENOUGH—A Tale of the Times;
By the Author of " The Three Experiments of Living."
London : John Green, 121, Newgate-street.

BURNS' MIDWIFERY.
New Edition, greatly enlarged.
This day was published, Ninth Edition, greatly enlarged, 16s.
boards, of

917 HE PRINCIPLES' OF MIDWIFERY;
including the DISEASES of WOMEN and CHILDREN.
By JOHN BURNS, M.D. F.R.S.
. _

Regius Professor of Surgery in the University of Glasgow, &c.
* 4' The emendations in this Edition are numerous, and the ad-
ditions extend to nearly fifty pages.
By the same Author,
PRINCIPLES OF SURGERY,
Vol. 1., containing Inflammation, Tumors, Aneurisms, Sze. 14s.
London : Longman, Orme, and Co.

PARLEY'S GRAMMAR of MODERN GEOGRAPHY.
In One Pocket Volume, embellished with Eighty Engravings,
Price 45. 6d. bound in cloth,
A GRAMMAR of MODERN GEOGRAPHY.
By PETER PARLEY,
Author of " Tales about the Sun, Moon, and Stars," " Tales about
Europe, Asia, &c."
A New Edition, embellished with ammerous Maps and other En-

graving,.
London : Printed for Thomas Tegg and Son, 73, Cheapside ;
and sold by every other Bookseller in the United Kingdom.
Of whom also may be had,
All the other Works of Peter Parley.

VAN BUTCHF.LL ON FISTULA, ke.
SECOND EDITION.
Just published, in Svo., cloth boards, prise ss.
FACTS and OBSERVATIONS relative to a
New and successful MODE of TREATING PILES,
FISTULA, HEMORRHOIDAL EXCRESENCES, TU-
MOURS, and STRICTURES, without CUTTING or CON-
FINEMENT; illustrated with numerous Cases. Being a familiar
exposition of the practiee of

S. J. VAN BUTCHELL, Surgeon Accoucheur.
Published by H. Renshaw, 356, Strand ; sold also by tho Author,
at his residence, 16, Percy-street, Bedford-square.
" We earnestly recommend this volume to the attention •f all
persons. * It abounds with interesting cases, which aro
attested by the patients themselves; who, under 'Alr. Van Butchell's
care, have been restored to health, when *very other treatment had
failed."—West Kent Guardian.

This volume presents to us a number of illustrations of his sin.
gular success under circumstances that would have induced despair
in any professor of leas mastery, or less accustomed to accomplish
cures when, cures seem impossible. The statements hero made are
most convincing, and place beyond doubt the superiority of the treat-
ment to which they refer."—Court Journal.
" The great surgical skill and attention of Mr. Van Butchell to
certain complaints of a most painful nature are well known."—
Bell's Weekly Messenger.
" An excellent work on Fistula, &e. * * * It is
deserving the perusal of those persons who may unfortunately be
suffering under the disease on which it treats."—Age.

REGISTRATION OF VOTERS.

MIDDLESEX.
Messrs. Covt toltx and TAMLYN held their respective
courts on Friday, at the Sussex Arms, Hammersmith, to
,•vise the lists of voters for the parishes of St. Luke, Chel-
sea, and St Mary Abbott's, Kensington.
No case of interest was decided.
The list for the parish of St. Mary Abbott, Kensington,
which came before Mr. TAMLYN, was not concluded.
On Saturday Mr. COVENTRY and Mrr TAMLYN, the
Revising Barristers, held Courts at the Sussex Arms, Ham-
mersmith, pursuant to adjournment from the previous day,
for the purpose of revising the lists for the parishes of Fal-
ham, Hammersmith, Chiswick, and part of Kensington.
(Before Mr. COVENTRY.
FULHAM BRIDGE.—DECISION.—The above important
case having been appointed for argument, the Court, on
its opening, was much crowded.
Mr. Henry Barkley, of Lime-street-square, who claimed
as a freehold shareholder in Fulham-bridge, was opposed by
Mr. Coppock, on the ground that the property was per-
,onal, and not real. •
Mr. COVENTRY, after al the arguments which had been
read, was still of opinion that the freehold was clearly
vested in the shareholders.

Mr. Coppock would still contend it was not. They had
only an interest in the tolls, and had no power to divide the
shares.

Mr. COVENTRT said they had, however, done so, and
the act had been recognised, and they had voted. He did
not see, however small the portion of a share might be, if
it was sufficient to give a qualification of forty shillings,
that he had any power to strike the name out. He did not

doubt it was aniisdemeanour in any person to create votes
for election purposes, but where property was not so divided,
he thought the possessor had a clear right to vote. The
only question was, whether they should vote for each county.
H e must repeat, he could see no point which could raise a
doubt on his mind.
Mr. Coppock said if that was the decision of the Learned
Barrister, he would at once come to the question of owner-
ship and value.
Mr. Blatchford then proved that Mr. Barkley's portion
was of the value of 31., and the claim was allowed.
The whole of the other claims in respect of the same pro-
perty, thirty-eight in number, were then allowed, with five
exceptions, the parties not having held the shares before the
30th of January last.
The remaining cases on the Fulham list were then gone
through ; after which the Hammersmith list was taken.
Theodore Hook was unsuccessfully objected to by the
Reformers.

The Rev. Mr. Letwood, incumbent of St. Mary's
Church, was objected to on the ground that his name had
been added in writing to the list after it had been printed.
The circumstances of his case were rather singular. It
appeared that he at first sent in his claim to the overseers of
the Hammersmith district, and they finding that his prir?-
perty did not lie in Hammersmith, but in Fulham, sent his
claim to the overseers for Fulham, who inserted it in their
list after it was printed.
The Fulham overseer having been examined, deposed
that the name had been sent to him from Hammersmith ;
and he wrote it on the list which he got printed before he
affixed his own signature to it. The claim was not sent to
him in the legal time, before the 20th of July, but he knew
that jt had been sent to Hammersmith before that time.

Mr. COVENTRY finally disallowed the claim.
Yesterday the Revising Barristers for the county of Mid-
dlesex held their Courts at the Court-house, Marylebone,
for the purpose of revising the lists of voters in respect of
property in the parishes of St. James, Westminster ; St.
George, Hanover-square ; St. Anne, Westminster ; St.
Pancras, St. Marylebone, and Paddington.
The results of the day's revision in Mr. CRAIG'S Court
were :

In the parish of St. James, Westminster.—Overseers'
objections, 25 ; sustained, '25. Reformers' objections, 40 ;
sustained, 7. Conservative objections, 12 ; sustained, 4.
In the parish of St. Pancras.--Overseers' objections, 40 ;
sustained, 30. Reformers' objections, 11 ; sustained, 0.
Conservative objections, 13 ; sustained, 2.
In the parish of St. Marylebone.—Overseers' objections,
32 ; sustained, 23 ; Reformers' objections, 21 ; sustained, 4.
Conservative objections, 11 ; sustained, 7.
In Paddington.—Overseers' objections, 2 ; sustained, 2.
Reformers' objections, 5 ; sustained, 0. Conservative ob-
jections, 9 ; sustained, 2.

(Before Mr. TAMLYN.)
The only case of any importance which occurred in this
Court yesterday, was one which was connected with the
trustee question, on which Mr. Tamlyn had not yet, in any
instance, pronounced his decision. The case was ono in
which Mr. William Ewett had been appointed trustee of
property, under a will, for the purpose of maintaining and
educating the children of a friend of his. Mr. Ewett claimed
to vote in right of his trusteeship. He was objected to by
the Tories.

Mr. TAMLYN, seeing that the claimant was in full posses-
sion of the property of which he was made trustee, and that

he had the full and uncontrolled disposal of its rents and
profits, at present contented himself with deciding that the
name objected to be retained on the list.
The proceedings during the rest of the day were quite
uninteresting. The results of the day's revision in this
Court were as follows : In the parish of St. George, Ha-
nover-square—Overseers' objections 7, sustained 7 ; Re-
formers objections 10, sustained 4 ; Conservative objections
4, sustained 1. In the parish of St. Anne, Westminster—
Overseers' objections 10, sustained 10 ; Reformers' ob-
jections 11, sustained 3 ; Conservative objections 28, sus-
tained 3.