The Sun.
London, England, 1806-07-09 00:00:00

If his, Noble Friend 'had kept the warrant back longer.
than was nec ssary for the convenient& of. public
buSineSs, he would allow it to be 'censurable, but
he contended that the contrary, Was 'the case.
Lord ELDON explained. •

Lord REPESbALE contended, that there Was
an essential difference between the warrant of recall
of a Lord Lieutenant of Ireland and of a Governor-
General. The former was_ to-have effett only upop
the arrival of the new Lord Lieutenant in Ireland,
whereas the latter was tolave an immediate effeet.
It was' an improvident discretion, therefore, on the
part of His Majesty's Ministers, to retain the warrant
in trust, and he maintained that it had been kept
only With a view to constrain the Court of Dire&ors
to choose another Governor-Genera' and Council,

The. LORD CH,, NCELLQR left the Woolsack,
and expressed his surprise at the violent strain that
had been adopted. The former objedion was, that
an interregnum existed ; the:present objedion lay
against the means that had.beeri.resorted to to pre-
vent that interregnum.' The constru&ion put upon
the Statute by the Noble Lords whb 'supported
the Motion, instead of tending to the. security of
our distant Government,,:seemed only to perplex
men's minds, and was founded on a quibble. The
King had 'unquestionably the pOWer of recalling a
Governor-General 5 but the appointment N.4as vested
tor. good purposes; in the Great- Corporation. The
warrant of recall was to be Communicated to the
Cohrt of Directors in eight days, a'nd
.here vas an
interregnum without any obje&ion being made to it.
The. Dire tors had two months 'to appoint another,
a space a interregnum to which no objedion Was
Made ; and yet the Government in that case .must
be contemplating the event Of -the appointment of a
successor.: It was. most desirable thatthe GoVernor
going'out should Carry with him .the order for
the recall of the:..fornitr one. Ht. had attended
to the Noble Viscount throughout, and., thought
that he -nibbled at the prerogative giVen to Ibis
Majesty by the AEt. In judging of the mean-7
ing of the Ad,. it ought to be holleEted from •
its obVious import, and not by substituting quib-
bles for the fair construction. of the Aet. . To
'understand the Aet, the Noble and .Learned. Lord'
should cOnsider the spirit of it; to look at-the-time
when His Majesty got. the prerogative, and at the
time when he it: not; to :regard-the Resolution
of the House of - Commons upon which it was •
founded. It was rather too late to read such Leb-
tures ill that House. His, Maiesty's advisers were
undoubledly responsible • for the exercise of this
prerogative ~ as well as -every other. tut it 'did
not follow, because they thought fit to advise
His Majesty to remove any 'Ocer, suppose to
take the seals froth- hirn, that they Ought to lay. the
grounds Upon which they ailed before that House,
or that the House could 'call for them. Many thing's ,
-had been-stated in, the course of the ni., ght.of a dan-
gerous tendency. In drawing the charader of Sir
George Harlow, the Noble Lord hid stated, that he
yielded. to Marquis Cornwallis;, but that he might
not be so well disposed in the
_present instance.--
This went went the length of 'establishing the principle,
that. the Governors of distant Provinces might raisesa
rebellion if they should not approve of their succes-
sors. The'clistant P,ossessions were the mortal ,part
of every- PoWer ; and in these times, when so many
Thrones; and States, and' Powers, had passed,. it Was
dangerous to countenance such doEtrines.

Cord:-EL,Dots in 'explanation 'stated, that if the
cbarge.of askumption of illegal powers was called
conundrums and quibbles, he should take an oppor
tunity of bringing these great principles .ulider the
.F'Dnsideration of the Souse.
. Earl AOSSLYN said: a few words against, the- Me-
llon. '

The several Motions were then negatived without
a division. -

Earl WESTMORLAND pre.. sented a Petition from the
Planters, &c. of the West India Colonies, :against
the Slate Carrying Bill, praying to be heard by Coun-
sel against the Bill. Ordered to lie on the Table,
and that*Petitioneri be-heard by Counsel against the
Bill on the second reading on Friday, for which day
their Lordships were' ordered to be summoned on
the Motion of Lord HAWKESBURY.
Adjourned'at Half past Ten.

HOUSE OF COMMONS.

TUESDAY, JULY 'B.

Gbrdon's Divorce Bill was committed. Witnesses
were examined, and the Report 'received without
amendMents.

Sir JOnx SP.,;CLAIit brought tip,a Bill for making
a Harbour•at Wicks, in Caithness ; 'a Bill for Build=
ing • new Treasury Chanibers in. Edinburgh; a Bill
,
for Building, a Lunatic Asylum-there; and.a Bill for
-Nakina and Repairing &c. in Scot-,
.land ; the expences of all 'which were to be dis-
charged out 4the balances-Of tl:ieforleited Estates in
Scotidnd.. Read a first and ordered to be read a Se-'
cond time to-morrow. ,

The Westminster Hall Bill, and the Postage Bill,
were read a third.time,and
vgassed. 2 .
The Malt At Amendment Bill was brought-in,
read a first and ordered -to be read a second- time to-
'
niorrovir. ,

Sir Joirx SnisCLAIR brought up the Stage Coach
Aas,Amendment Bill. Read a first and ordered to
be read a second time on Thursday.

• SUPPLIES AND WAYS AND MEAN'S. • •
The Report of the Corninittee of Supply relative to
the Vote of Credit of 2,400,(Y001.' was brought up.
Also the. RePort of the Committee of Ways and
Means relative to the 3b Millions out of the surplus
of the Conslidated Fund, were brought up, Reso-
lutions agreed to, and Bills ordered accordingly.

The Lottery Bill was read a first, and oraered, tb
be read"a second time to-morrow.

. The Report of the Committee on the American
Timber:Aols was brought up.—Resohations agreed to.
A Message from,the Lords announced their assent
to the London Port Improvement Bill, and others.
• INSOLVENT DEBTORS.

The Insolvent Debtors' Bill was committed. In
the Committee Mr. KERR proposed, that those per-
sons who removed themselves by Habeas Corpus
from one gaol to 'another should have the-benefit of
the A& ; and also, that where ft was provided
that the provisions should not, extend to persons re-
taining 501.. worth of goods liable to be distraiiied,
for.rent, the sum, instead, of 501. 'should be 201.
These Amendments, were agreed to. .; He then pro-
posed, that the Debtors should be obliged to give

notice to'their several 'Creditors of theitintention to
avail themselves of the A&. This was rejeaect—,
The Bill then passed the Committee. !Repott to-
morrow.

BiLItKES reported from the. Committee to
preparean 2%.nswer to the• Lords 'on the subje& of
the .E.aminatiow•of Peers before. the commons.—
The Report Was, that. the Commons were.alwaj's
anNious to preserve the, privileges of both House,_
but that the power of calling for, and entbrcing, th
attendance of Nobl7men, tiOt Peers' of Pariiament,_
was certainly vested in- the House of ,COmmons
that the precedent had been established in the case
t.f Lord Balcarras ; that Lord Teignmouth was not a
Peer of Parliament,- and was therefore liable to be
called upon ; and that unless , this privilege was in-
s;sted upon the 'Commoos would be materially ob-
struded in oneoof the Most_ important of their func-
tionsl—This Report-was order to. be. further Consi-
dered to-morrow.

The MASTER .of, the ''Ro.,Ls brought rip the
Chancery Solicitors'. Fees Regulation Bill.-711ead
first, and ordered to be read a . second ..time to-
morrow. •

On the Motion for the second reading of, the
Masters in Chancery Salary

Mr. Wm. SMITH. adverted to the Fund out of
which those Salaries were paid, which 'was that of
Suitors in Chancery, peyhaps, might bz.‘ errs
pioyed also for other publie.purposes.. The allow-
ance th,tk Masters in Chancery wak, c..3rtainly very
liberal..
The MASTER of the ROLLS acknowledged this-;
and said, that they certainly ought to haVe more than
was allowed‘thena in 176.5.

„Mr. TY;;WHITT JONES would not oppose the
Bill ; but as the sum alluded to, out of wlich such
salaries were paid,, was: very large, he thought the
names of the persons to whom it belonged should
be published., on tke principle of the Unclaimed,
Dividends. .

The Bill was then read a second time, and or-
dered to be committed to-morrow.,
The Accoun tan t-Gen6ral's Clerks' Allowance Bill
was read' a second time, arid ordered to be .com-
,rnitted to-morrow.. ,

The Greenwich Hospital Bill,,and the Greenwich
Chest Bill ivere read a third time, and., after .Clauses
bad been added for, allowing to the Hospital, and
CheSt a per centage' on the droits'of the Admiralty;
by way Riders, passed.
On 'the Motion of Mr. ROB§ON, the. Memorial
of. Mr. John Pritchard; presented to the Comrnis7
sioners of Military ;Inquiry, and laid before the
House, was
.ordered to be
,prinied:
Mr. EELLOWES, with a view to have a watchful
eye on the Residence of the CletY, moved; that
Copies of the Returns of the Bishops on that subje6t
should be prepared, with a, view to their being pre,-
sented early the next Session.—Ordered. •

Mr. HosHousa brought up the Report of the
Committee on the AlesSige. for making provision for
the junior Branches of the Royal Family.
l\ r. RIDLEY Cora stated, that some of the. Royal
Dukes were in possession of Ranger hips and other
Oftices of Emolument, and therefore-this allowance
to them was certainly extremely liberal. ,
Lord HENRY PETTY did full justice to the motives
of public economy
,'by which hi's Hon. Vriend way
aduat&l, but certainly when 'he had. better consi,
dered the sUbjea and examined thestatemeht which
he (Petty) had made on a former occasion, he would
perceive that this' grant was really nothing more
than was necessary, •In addition to ,that, however,
it was to be considered that the . claims on. the Civil
List had been withdrawn, as also the allowance for -
the tables of sorne of the Princes.

. „
• Mr. ROSE said that the Noble L era. might have
adverted to the precedents of the 1./11:c:; Of Glouces-
ter 'and Cumberland; and as to tl,t. a:u:',e for
RMngerships, we were not
,to cunsit- aO. tits..
in'providing for the Royal it'tn"i.
The , Resolutions were. then agreed to,
ordered on the first' four, the
,other? being under-
stood to go again to the Committee of Supply for
'some alterations.

Mr. NVlNotipt moved for leave to bring in a Bill'
for Regulating the Rankof yolunteer and Yeoinanry
Otlicers.—LZve was:gi.ven.
The Bankrupt. Laws Ailer.i.dinent Bill was re-
ported, and ,ordered to be,,read a .third time to-
niorrow.

AMERICAN INTERCOURSE BILL. • '
Lord TESZPLE moved the third reading of the
American Intercouru-, Bill. . • .

Sir CHAP. LES. PRICE expressed his deCided
opposition to the Bill. • He had COnversed with the
.must eminent West India Merchants on the busi-
ness, and was.as much acquainted With the shipping
interest cf die Country as any one man in the House,
and all we're averse to it. It• would Materially injure.
the Canada trade. Such interests certainly deserved-.
that an examination shotild have place - up stairs.
He regretted t4e'abSerice of the Eight.Hory. Secre
'tary of State (Mr. FoX), who had expressed his dis-,
approbation of a ,similar Bill, in 178.5,, and whose
sentiments he could not suppose' wer-e.altered now,
The American Merehants had'
.-stated to him as a ,
fact, that one-third, perhaps one-half, of the Seamennavigating American Vessels wereßritish subje&s.
•
Government would have been better employed in
examining into this, than' in bringing forward such-
a measure as the present. He was-well diSspoSecl_to
the Executive Government, but could notiabandon
the interests of his Constituents. ,He concluded by •
moving, that the word " now" be left out; for the
purpose ofinserting " this day three months."
• Mr. Baobitick opposed the Bill, which, be eon--
;tended, was unju3t,.urinecessarrandimpOlitic. .
. Mr. STURGES •BOURNE adverted to the late-
bess'of the Session, and the thinness df the House,
and insisted • upon the impropriety of gassing a
Bill. of such. importance under such circumstances.
.Ministets had opposed a delay of four days, that
might allow an examination up stairs, and yet the
Bill had no* been in the ;House two months. The
..c.bjeet of the Bill was to Suspend the Navigation
laws systematically, 'during the War, and the ob-
jedion to it was that it transferred the power from
.thp.Governors-, who mtkst, from their. situation,' be
better able to decide on the necessity of the cases,
'tit;
.Ministers, who might permit when it was hot
necessary; and.' refuse when it was indispensible.
:The Right HonourabjeSecretary over the way (Mr.
Windlaarri) had taken upon himself to issue an
'order op • this subjeta, which wa.s• a 'flagrant viola-
tion
of the Navigation Laws, add now; instead of
*bringing in a -I3ill to indemnify hiniself, which he ;
ought to do,, he w S.bi.4)orting a till for sanaion,,

Ingsnelf violatiees for' the fature., Ti Bill evas
• certainly, calculated to diminish the'Shipprng of the
Country, end to discoirra4. e the trade'of our Noi-th
American . Colonies. It was calculated to render
(this Country dependent on America, which would
give the latter Country a great advantage in . cage of
1 a War, for which the
.bulk of the popeiatioti of
America seemed well disposed. If, however,, he
might jo.dge from what appeared in the_ Ministerial
Prints, there would be no War while we.had a cdn-
cession to make ; but of all Moments this': was ,the
worst for concessible conchided by. declaring;
that he would support the Amendrhent..
Mr. MAlilv7V/IRING spoke against the Bill,
which would not, he hoped.'be passed 'without any
• observations frolu those. Ministers who had ".upon
this, and ether important questions, behaved:in such
a slovenly, indecorous, and sullen tpanner, as not
even to condescend stating to the Hotise the treasons
upon which they aced.
Sir ,g77LLIA.III YODZTG nwintained, • that an
occasional 'relaxatiop, and particularly in time of
War, had been found•materially beneficial to our
Commerce, and consequently to our Revenue.
deprecated the idea of any egperiment in favour of
the . views of mercantile, speculators; which.put to
;risk the lives of six hpndred,thousand persens em-
ployed iii, theceltivation" of our Colenies., ' ,
Lord DE BLAQUIERE oppoSed the Bill ; its
• 'tendency, if not its obje6.l, he contended to be to
make concessions to the Americans, who had lately
done every thing buespit in our face: He cautioned
theyoung men by who this Bill was introduced;.
•not to sport .with those Navigation Law.s„'which had
contributed so much to-the establishment, and were -
so essential to the maintenance of our maritime.
greatness.
• Lord TEMPLE argued,. that the necessity for
this measure must be • admitted by 'everyman who
fully, cOnsidered thee subjed,-end it propOsed to do
nothing more than to san6tien, when • necessity
forit, that .system for-the future which had'
been illegally done forthe last thirteen years. He
denied that the parties interested had not been al-
lowed the fullest opportunity of stating their case
to the House : for it must be recolle&-ed,• that,' they'
themselves declined to' be heard by Counsel at the
Bar, although the Motion for the purpoise was ori-
ginally agreed toe= .In answer--to the assertion, 'that
the British Merchants were•quie2 competent to supl,
ply our Colonies vial, provisions, he would
only ask—how came it that foe, the last thirteen
years they had net been able to do so, and that the
Colonies were under the • indispensible necessity.
of Tesortini (to America fqr these- articles.? . Ex-
perience had sufficiently shewn the fallacy of this
.
assertion. •
Lord CISTLEREIGH animadverted upon the
'very extraordinary- •manner" in which this measure '
had been introduced and supported, none of His
Majesty's Ministers having. saki -much in support of
it. It did not originate with the Minister in whose
departinent .such a measure probably lay (Mr.
Windham),', nor did the. House hear a word resped-
ins, it from any .one of His Majesty's confidential
advisers but the Secretary of Stale for Foreign Af-
fairs—the cause of whose absence. on this occasion
every man of feeling must deplore ; and he retnem-
bered -that the remarks of that distinguished. Person
were rather' of a Mature to 'aggravate the alarrii
which this measure was calculated to. produce. The
precedent of the Data/ 'Property ACI, which was
quoted by the supporters of this Bill, was not, he
contended, at all applicable ; and as to the•capactty
of our Shipping to supply the Carrying' Trade be-.
tweerrour Coloniei.and America, he felt Persuaded
"that.noedeubt could exist upoe the subjed„ ifthose
Convoys were granted,which he could appeal 'to the
First Lord of the Admiralty, might, in the present
circumstances,. be amply affbrded, Without any sa- ;
crifice, or even risk of our naval strength.- • If the
idea were once adopted which this }Bill conveyed; -
the Noble Lord felt that the Colonies would become
.more Americarethan English ; for it was in fad di=
redly calculated to encourage the Americans,to en-
tertain the opinion, and to a& .upon it--that., our.
Colonies could not subsist without the aid at Athe-
rice. When such a measure as that befOre,the
-Honse was .Coupled.with the Publication out of
.doors, called " The Inquiry into the State of the
Nation," 'which., was. notoriously Conntenanced by
Ministers, lie' could not help feeling the most serious
apprehension forthe'ptesperity of the conetry under
the direction of such Men. In the Publication al-
luded to the opinion *as 'Maintained, that this Coun-
try was no,longer_ able to maintain her rank amozeg• ,
the. Nations of Etirdpe--that she nanst sink to. a se-
Andary State—and • that *she Must surrender- het.
general maritime and belligerent riglas.. Conneft-
ing such- a •proieaion with the countenance, it re-
ceived, the time at Which this Bill was introduced,
and alio the doubt expressed, almost in the shape' of
an opinion, by the Secretary for. For.' ti Affairs, be
confessed himself alarmed for the fete of hiS Coun-
try.e Ministers applied, in "this instance,' for the
blind.eenfidence'of ParliarnenteWithout stating any
ground of necessity. They said,' ‘.‘, 'Give us. pOwer
-and we will use it." They held the same language
relative to the Chelsea .and the Training Bills;
indeed, they demanded more than ever the. &dating
spirit. of•any GoVernment had attempted to call u: our
Parliament for. before.
Lord H. PETTY conceived'the greater part of
the observations -whical the House had. beard ti-em
the Noble Lord who spdke last;. and others on the,
same side; quite inapplicable to this sr:l*a, wlt}i
-which the general arguments about-tit;; Navigation
Law, and. Pamphletse out of doors, had no sort of,
connexion. • The only objea.or-thii measure was
previously to legalize a course, of, proceeding which
heretofore had been 'illegally, pursued. And when
Gentlemen called • such a • measure 4-rew and :Anon-
strous, they appeared to forget their oars, zfe.`ts—bnt
particularly to' keep out of vtew the proposition of
their friend,-Mr. Pitt, in 1783, which went much
further than this Bill ; for that preposition would
grant the,free unrestrained commeiee of American
Ships with our c'olonies, •and the interchange of all
articles of the, growth and manufaclure of. each—
and yet this .measure before the House was terneed
quite new and extraordinary. The _Noble Lord had
heard of an illicit enjoyment, where, according to
the Poet—
" The glowing guilt exalts the keermielight."
But' he had never heard before this night that it
would be more• gratetial to pursue a commerce in di-
reet violatiOn of law, than to give'it ae legal. sanc-
tion—and that it would be more 'agreeable to the
Braish Ship Owners to have,:a power vested in' the

• - • • :-:* . . ,
Cot'erinet s*of the Islt/tlcb abroad; :who Dii,ght be it;
,fluenced—pho mighvbe_corropted to adopt arrange.
,ments to their prejuldi.c.,thap.to have,the Cfan3•
fetred to the Privy COO neil atl ome,towhymthesc.Ship
Owners might 'COIII/111.111IC.afC aity `stateinents they
might hive • to make, and from whom: they' would
be always sure to meet the ftillest attention: Tbat
.similar powers of suspending the. laws) where, ne-
cessity called for it, was vested by. Pa'rliarnept in the
Privy Council, the Noble LOrd sheaved by
to the Ads.of the 34th and 2,5 th Of the, F-escittEing,
relative to the. case.

The JWAS TER of the 'llO LES said, that bY
the comprehensive energy of.t.'wo short lines of
this Bill, it, was. proposed ,to sweep away the
whole body of our. Navigation Laws and. Colonial
System. .
•
• Lord H. PETTY explained.
The ATTORNEY_ GENERA L ably 1,7:n-dicate.d"
the principle of this Bill, and the solicitude of the
authors for the maintainance of the Navigation
Laws.

. . .
Mr. PERCIVAL spoke against the Bill.
• Mr. W I iVDH.d.iii conceived that it was totally
unnecessary that his Majesty's Ministers should rise.
seriatim to answer arguments which had hem so,
repeatedly advanced and 'overturned. If a ~I3ill of
Indemnity, however, had been - „spoken .of, it )Vas
not the time to desire that yet—something must b
done first, and•when that: tittle did arrive, lie'shbukl
hope that the House would indulge him So far -as 'to
say, that; they did not see the necessity' of it until.
Earl Camden came forward to ask for his indem-
nity for having pursued a nearly similar -line 'Of_
coi:Tuft.' '., .. - , •

. „
• Mr. Ros'H .again insisted 'that the present In3:*
sure would by a gross infta6tion of the: Navigaticii
Laws.

The question was very generally. ealled tar, and
the House divided—

For the Third Reading
Againstjt

- 85
30

55
Majority l
.
Previous to the passing of the Bill Mr. PRISEP
brought up his promised Clauses, which, zfflcr soave
alteration, were adopted, and added by way.of ri,:et
to the Bill; after which the Bill passed, and wSs
ordered to the Lords. ,

. ,
The' Bill for regulating , -th- Rank of 011174 rs
of the Yeonianry and Volunteer Corps was brotiglit
in; read a first, and , ordered to be read a 2d time
to-morrow. . .

Mr. W. SMITH gave notice that he, would, op
Friday next, *move .for an Account of ail Onsei
held by the different "branches. of the Royal Ita-
mdity, together with the Salaries arising from e
:tcii.
. The different Orders on the List.Nc'ent tnron-:11
their regular stages, •and tile House adjoutird at
Hal} past Two.

From she
,LONDON GAZETTE, fitly 8, 1800:

Commission signed 6c the Lord Lieurenont of the Cozoy of
•
Lave:ion 1/c' steers,
Beaumont Leeson, Gent. to be Surgeon, vice Salkelcl,:'
lune 7, 1806. '
Commissions,in the Royal South Lincolnshire signed by
the Lord Li:unman!.
_ _

Ceorge Denshire, Esq. ,tu belVlajor, vice _Hurst, resigned.
D.rte;:, dune 10, 1806. IVilliam Esq; Captain,
vice I.),nshite, promoted. •DAted June z 6, 1806. Warren
Maude, Gent. to L.: Ensign. Ditted June zs, 006.

Commissist signed ljv the Lord Lieutenant of tbe County of Kent;

Elham Ti -c4 .ofre:dnamy.
Elias Lott, Gent: to be Lieutenant, vice Kemp,. deceased.
Dated idly 3, ►BO6.

yqy 8, 18:6.

fsIEINIBEII. RETURNED TQ SERVE IN THIS PRESENT

PARLIAMENT.
BortouG'H OF- HONITON.
The Honourable tkuiustus brOstraw;

• • •
The Circuits' appointed for the Surniner Assizes,
1.806, areas follow, viz.

NORTHERN CIRCUIT.
Mr. Baron GRAHAM 11nd Mr. Baron SUTTON.
City of,York,. and k.:ounty of. the same Cute.—Saturday,July, 19, at the`Guildhall of the said City.
Yorkshire—The same Day, at the .Castle of Xork.
DUrllarn—:Tuesday, July 29, at the Castle of Durham. • '
Town of Newcastle,ooli- !'yne, and County of the same
Towc—Saturday, August 2, at the Guildhalt of the said
Towti. .
Northumberland—:The same Day,_ at the Castle of N
c'.v.
castle..upon-Tyne, . 4
Cumberland—Friday, August 8, -at-the'City of. earlislc.
Westmorland —Wednesday, August. 13, -at Appleby.
Lancashire—Saturday, August 16, at the Castle of Lancaster.

• HOME CIRCUIT..
Lard Chief 13'aron'MAeno NA-1. Atr. justice HEa rh.
Hertfurd—Alonday-, July zr, at Hertford. •
Essex—Wednesday, 'illy 2.3, at CheimsfOrd. ' -
Kent—Mouddy, July zB, at Maidstone.
Sussex—STittirday, August 2, at Lewes.
surrey—Thursday,, August 7, at, Guildford.

'OXFORD :CIRCUIT.' * •
Mr. JUSECe LAWRE'Ner. Mr. Justice LI BI A N C."
terkShire—Mon4v, July 2r, at A'..-.,ingdon. ; • .
OxtordShire—Wecitresday,'-ittiqy 23, at Oxford.
Worcestershire—Satiirday, July 2.6' at WorceJter.
City o 1 Worcester—The srttne Day,. at the City of Worcester.
t;ioue.islcrsilitre—CVtduestray; July 30., at 'Gloucester. • •
City co,f• (ileucester-,The same Day,- at the- City ,i)f
ceste,.
11,1oknoutlishire-,Saturdly, Aujst 2:, at Monmouth, •
Ilerourdshire —TUeF.day, August 5, atliereford.
Shropshire—Saturtlay,-.Augtst 9, at Shrewsbury.
.„
Statibrcisbire--cW‘driesJay-, August 13, at Stait7Jld. •
BRECON CIRCUIT.
The Hon. AaLi Moyszy, Esq,
Presteigne—hiotiday, August 11
).;!,:cOrt':-Saturday; August 46.
August A 3; „ •
C;IPSTEN. CIRCUIT'. * •
R 0•11 ERZ DAL/. fki; Et.q. fanmetsilkni.rox, Escl,
Moritgc,inciystufe—',AUpSt 16, Ar. Pool.,
I.s.4ibigosturcLo.dr,7ust•2..i, at R,..c,Ain.
lintshiler-iitigusi at Mold. ,
CLAire—Scpteiptiet- 3, at the Cas'tle of Chester. • ,
CARMAWTHENT SUMMER -T CIRCUI, ig,,,6,, •
Ciritiartbenshire--Monday, Att4ust a r, at Carinarthein.
Sturday, August-i 6, at klaverforthvep.-
Catiliganshire— f iiday, August 22, at Cardipu.„

-,

14hi1vKR l rFTC,IE ,5* F. ANTLARGED,., - •
George. Vaughan the youzzer, tindich‘rood, trevethin,
I\lo,,ii3utl2shire, and of 'll\lesvi,•6l-:i col+lll,,
coal-trainer, o iner, frn •i• .4i,rO.lLZ, At the Mira-
. menTay...:ru, ail SaintS:lllner,stol. • •
Gec,rge Vaughan Tralethut,-SIOh.
Mouthshne.aud cif Nev,surr;-iu the satile'Coulity,
miner, twin July 5 toAuAt 23, at ten, at rue
ravern, All Saint•*'-lbuy3, 13ristul.-

B4NKALIi) TS
chArles Bulling,, of the Kent-toad, St.. Gdzorge the Martyr,
Southwark, Surrey, vie,tuai;Tir, to surrender July rI, at
one, la, at ten, and Augut at twelve, at (.;k4i1,1,,,,11,
Londnn. ..ALtornes-,. Mr. vans Kennington.: Citisss
Sufrey.
John Hatch, of Axbridge, Somersetshire, grocer, to surc,nder
J,lly 24, 25, and August :39, at eleven 4 at the Rufrihier
TaVtja, .AU Saii3ts'44,tica Bristol. tornics, !Sir; -,1)041.