The Sun.
London, England, 1863-06-10 00:00:00

THE SUN, LONDON, WEDNESDAY EVENING, JUNE 10, 1863.

SHARE MARKETS--This day.

ORDINARY SHARES AND STOW', S.

nanways. raid. Closing Busi
Price. i done.

Share

3.14.

Bir., Wol., and Str. Val.
(Blythe and Ty-ne.
1 Bost.,Sl eat,and ildid.l/4.;e !
Bristol and Exeter
Caledonian
Cork and .Ban(lon
Cornwall
EA nets no illy
Do. B
B° A •tillOp cp VI lac
been- paid toll( 1
Dublin t Belfast .3unc.l
Dun.,Perth,&Ab. Junc.
(Edinburgh & Glasgow.
(.31asg. and S. Western.
Great Eastern, Ord. stk 1

8 8a

8} 8;
85 87
116 117}

s 5
itti 17

6 7

40 41
14 15
91 93
IGB 110
52 53
48 50
241 25}

52
49
24) 5

Ditto A stock_

Ditto East Anglian st
GreatNorthof Scotland
Great Northern
Do A stock

Do B do
Gt. S. an W. of Ireland
Great Western ...
Do Str Val gun. stock
Lancashire & Yorkshire'
!London and Blackwali
Lou., Bright.,& S. Coast'
Lon., Chat., and Dover
Lon. & Nor' h Western
!Lon. & So*.th Western
,Man., Shef., & Lincoln.
!Maryport and Carlisle.
Dot 5hare5.........,
Metropolitan
,Midland
Do New

6.4.0

Do Binning. enr, Derby
Mid. Gt. W. of Ireland

Do. 4 shares
Mid Kent

Do Cray Line
North British
Edin., Perth, & Dundee
Mb. Eastern—Berwick
Do, G.N.E. purchase
Do Leeds
Do York

Do Carlisle....
[North London
I Do New
'North Statibrdshire
1. and S. W. Junction
;Scottish Central
!Scot N. It., Aber. stock

9.15.4'

Do Scot. Mid. stock
,Shrews, and Weichpoo
[Shropshire Union
South Devon
South Eastern
'South Wales
IS. York. and River Dun
Staines, Wok.,and Wok.
,Stockton dz ton

Do _

Do New, 186 G
Taff Vale.
Do B
Do C
Ulster

Do

Do
Vale of Neath
IVictoria sta. and Pim
Waterford & Kilkenny
West Cornwall
W. Hartlepool Har.&R
West Midland -Oxford
Do Newport
Do Hereford

128 129
128 129
134 136
101 103
E6l (7

1101 111;'
75 77
116 118
42 44
102 1021
104 i Ics)
45) 40

11i 12
128 1281
13/4 11d
147 99

bl t2i
24 254
1021 1028

58i 59 k
89/ 901

115 117
11
118
111
119 121
47,E
98 COI

N 52
32 33
911 02i
7./ 72
100 102
7* 7t
8 39
9i /04
n 81 1H
1
1535 i 156
3 Sir,

77 €0
155 157

28 30

45 (6
38 40
101 103

BRITISH P

ISSE,

SIONS.

Share
100
%tk
20

iwayo

Paid.
all

Closing
Price.
65 57
109 110
1 lA p
1k lip
5 6}
74 8

iantic tit It Lawrence
Bom.,Baroda.k.Cent Inc
Cu. 5 per cent..
Do. New ..

Do. E. Shares...
Buffalo and Laxe Enron

10
.00

Do. PreferQnce
Butalo,BrantotGodrich
0 p. at. bds. Aug. 1, 1!-.7
Do. do. July 1, "1.37''.
30. do. Juuc 1, 134
-Jlcutt.a.& S. kiaau. )
Cape Town 4-, Dock Scri;
Eastn. Bengal gu. 5 p. c'
East Indian, gu. 5 p. c.
Do. do. G Ext...• •

10
100
100
100

1(8 119
1c94 1101
111 1 2
1091 1101
14 11p
1 lip
191
69 71
5! 55
58 60
45 50
42 44
34 16
26 28
23 25
1101 1101
1 2 1-
1 11;
118/ 1091
it 'll

stock
stock

stock
100
100

Do. do. H do. ..
Grand Trunk of Canada
Do. lat Pref. Bonds..

Do. co. deferred......
Do. 2d Pref. Bonus..
Da. do deferred......
ed. ....
Do. 3d P ef. stock ...
Do. do. deferred......
Do. 4th l'ref. sto k...
Do. do. deferred......
Gt.lndlaPentu.gua.sp.o
Do. New gua. 5 p. n...
Do. January, 1862 ..
Gt. South.of India (Lin)
guaranteed 5 per ceni.
Gt. W. of Canada Shares

stock

'took

Do. New .......
Do. 6 p.c. '73 with't opt.
Do. 54 p. c. do. 77-5....'
Indian Branch Limited
Madrzs guar., 5 p. c.
Do. 44 p. o. Extension
Dc. 4a do. ..
Do. Fifth Extension.
Nlelb.Corp. c.
Helb. & Hobson's Bay.
Do. 7 p. c. along. Bds.
NL w Br unswick t Cand.:

go g
97 100
89 E 2

1 i P
107 i loSi
10z 103
k 9 101

stock
stock
stock

stock

50 53

Glass Axn B.
v. lil.C'da6 pc Ist pt bdr
&lade
Du. Delhi
Do. do
Do. Punjztub
Do. Do. !
Do. indus.St. Flo.)

all
100
(I‘a
100

3 5
84 86
11 , 1 I
I':8 1( 9
1 AA

vocl

ft lip
1071 1184
105 It 7

1281
12

871 6I 7

771 6 7
117
431 4} 3
li2} 3 2
1051 41

111 i 1

1021

894 I

92 li

Business don,

109 i 9 i 1

noi 91 i

11} }
1?1

110 i 1 i
13i

21 t
108}

-41 OCk

1 7k S

(,)LONIAL, VER N EN! -141 C ' I'l t •••
•• ),(30),. p.c.ti a. &J 111:.
-- Ij
1877-S1
Do. (3 p. c. Feb. & Au!: 106 1(5
Do. 6 p.c.Mar.& ,45 107
t Do. Sp. c. Jan.&.July. 106' 97 98
- Do. 5 Inscribed stock 101' 05 97 •
4:ape G.H ope, 6 p 10,., 108 110
Do.Ap &Oct 1881 10( 112 114
Do. 184' lii 113 115
'Do. Jan. & July, 1891.. lOu 115 117
Ceylon, Nov.ls7B, 0p c ufi. 13 115
I.ld, u, thus i per cent .. 100 1091;1 IO9I
.Nara; Guy. 6 per cent.. 1)0 109 111 110
1074 1(84
Lo. sp. c.Ap. & Cc,.
- N. S.W. 6 cv. 5 p ;.,18 • 100 1025 1(34 1035
- Do. Sp. c.,18,1 to 1.',1 100 103 104
1 Do. d0.,1888 &upw (it 100 i 034 1045 1045
'New Zealand 0 p cent. 100 112 11.
Nova Scotia Gov. 6p. u.
1 sterling, 1875. lOO lon ICB4
Queensland G CV. 6p. c. 100 , 3 115
—II6. Aus G6p.c.1876.& up.. 100 113 115
.--Vie.Gov. 6 p.c. Ja.&Jul) 100 110 11.!
Do. io p.. An.&Oot.. 100 1114 1111,1111 4
- -
BRITISH MINES.
2 'Cambrian Consol. Goldi 4 id 1
Amalgamated..‘ 21 23
Devon G. Cons. (Tavist. 525 635
East Bassett(llloganl.. 30 874 90 93 41 90
1 East Clogau Gold Ltd. 53. 4d ip
East Caradon ...... 2.14.0 265 275 275 7
East Cara Brea... . 3-4-0 7 74
- - E. W'l Russel (Tavistk.); 8.1.6 35 4
Gam.&St.Aubyn(Gwen.)l 571 11 13
Great South Tolgus.... 125 44 5
G. Wheal Voralelstor( 10 65 7
Grenville .
tierod's- Foot 8.12 4i 47
tiingston Downs 4.17.0 24 3
Lady Bertha
3largaret (IJny Lelant 31 V 344
Marke Valley..
4 Ilyndy Iron Oro (Lim ; 25 15
New Seton l9l 110 120
North Downs 24 15 25
S.Wh'l Basset(lllo4an, 2.17.6 34 4
North Wheal Crotty
ear Consols (SA. Blazey; 15 43 65
20 Providence (Uny 10.6.7 12 44
South Caradon(St.Cleer; fl 1 4025 4074
3. Cam Brea (Illogan) 5.15.01 3 33/4
:!.Wheal Fran. (Illogs,n, 18.1 ~1.1 75 80
Stray Park
5 Tamar Silv.& Lead Min 45 1 1
Tin Crort 9 195 204 205
West Basset (Mogan). 15 12 13
kV Caradon (Liskearcid 5 25 27
West Seton
Wheal Basset (Mogan; 64 674 724
W heal Buller(ltedinth) 5 50 tO
Wheal Kitty (U.Lelant) 2.0.6
WhealLud. ott
Wheal MaryAnn(Men )I 8 15 (6
Wheal Seton .l 585 235 145
Wheal Trelaw
3.
ney (Lis.); 7 15 1
-- Wheal Union 1 17 3, 47

PREFEREN,

DE SHARES.

Cornwall, 5 per cent. gua., 21
Midland, Leicester and _Hitch
North Staffordshire, 221

in 4 per ct., c 54

RES AND STOCKS.
~ 964

PREPE rcENCE S.
Great Eastern, 4i per cent., pf
Ditto, 5 per cent. pf , 106
London, Chatham, Sze , 6 per cent. 2d pf., 82
London, Chatham, t c., Metrop..Cxt., B, 6 per cent.,
Ditto, o per cent., C, St
LINES LEASED AI FIXED RENTALS.
Hull and Selby, 112

FOREIGN RAILWAYS.
Bahia and San Francisco (lim.) gua. 7 per cent., 191
Dutch Rhenish, 17/
Great Luxembourg, 14/
Paris, Lyons, .nd Mediterranean, 42
Sambre and Meuse, 10/
San Paulo 7 per cent., 9}

Ditto (all), 22
South Austrian and Lombardo Venetian, 221
FOREIGN _MINES.

Cobre Copper, 227) 3
East del trey (lim.), 1
Port Philip, 17
Santa Barb Gold Mine (Dm.), 0
Scottish Austral'au, lim ,
St. John dcl Rey (lim.), 55 •
Vallanzas?,a Gold, lira., 14
Wor; hing (limited), 4
JOIN T-STOCX RANKS.
Agra and United. Service (Bin.), 1011 2
Alliance Bank of London and Liverpool (11m.), 321 3 21
Australasia, 7sl 4
Ditto, new, 31
Colonial, 39; 4
English and Irish (lim.), 5
Imperial Ottoman, in *
London and Brazilian aim.), 421
London Chartered Bank of Australia, 281
London and Colonial (liin.), 4t
London and County, 431 4 38 1
London Joint Stock, 64
London and South-Western
Midland Bank (lint.), 71
Union ot England and Prance (lim.), 81,
Union ot London, 361

DOCKS.

LAW INTELLIGENCE---This Day.

COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH.
:Sittings in Banco at Westminster, before the Lord Chief
Justice, Mr. Justice Wightman, Mr. Justice Crompton,

and lair. Justice Blackburn.)

THE EARL OF CARDIGAN V. LIEUT.-COLONEL THE HON.
SOMERSET TALBOT CALTHORPE -THE LIGHT CAVALRY

CHARGE AT BALARLAVA.

Mr. Bovill having replied on behalf of the Earl of Car-

digan's application to make rule absolute.
Mr. Garth, at the sitting of the Court this morning,
followed on the same side, dealing at some length with the
three points raised yesterday by Mr. Sergeant Shee. He
contended that the manner in which Colonel Calthorpe

had met the allegation, made against his work by Lord
Cardigan were uncaniid and ungenerous. He had said,
" I cheerfully declare myself satisfied that Lord Cardigan
entered the Itussian battery," thus turning the noble lord
into a playtting without making him a single atom 6t

reparation, and refusing him an apology. Considering
that the slanderer was an officer who held a low rank iu
the army, while the slandered was Lieutenant• General the

Earl of Cardig.oa, who had received the thanks of ParliaT

ment and the acknowledgments of Lord Raglan and Lo, d
Lucan and of his country in many ways, he c•,nsidered that
Colonel Calthorpe's was the most unb.andsome, the most un-

generous, the most uncandid, and the most unbecoming

style of retractatiou that could be imagined.
The Lord Chief Justice said he could entertain no doubt
that the passage in Colonel Calthorpe's work, upon which

he present appication had been made for a criminal infor-

melon, contained a most serious libel upon the Earl of Car •
. . . .

digan. He thought it was impossible to read that passage
without coming to the conclusion that that which it was

intended to convey was an imputation upon the Earl of
Cardigan of having been wanting in his duty at a time when

he was in command of a detachment of cavalry ordered to

attack the Russian battery, of having been wanting in
his duty from want of personal courage. It was true
that, in the first edition t.f this woik, the absence of
Lord CardigaL as a general officer was suggested when his

presence was necessary, and it was ascribe/to an accident,
It was said that his horse became alarmed by the discharge
of a cannon close to his head, and that the horse swayed

and carried Lord Caruigan away, in spite of himself,
off the field This was clearly intended to imply,
that Lord Cardigan never reached the batriry

which the detachment under his orders was directed to take,
but it acribed his failure to reach that battery which others

reacbed, and through which they carried their attack, to an
accident. Lord Cardigan, feeling that be had reason to com-

plain of this statement, as of many others contained in that
work, made it the subject of complaint and remonstrance.
In the .second edition a notice was prefixed to the work,
which in the third edition was incorporated in the shape of a
note, and in that notice in the second edition and the note in
the third, that which was given in the first edition as a cir-
cumstance accounting for Lord Cardigan's failure to reach
the battery, which the rest of the line under his command
did reach, was withdrawn in the shape of a compliment,--
a compliment ostensibly on the face of it, but which con-
veyed, in his judgment, the bitterest sarcasm—that it
was not the fault of Lord Cardigan's horse, but
his own fault, that he failed to reach the scene
of danger through which the others passed. It was
impossible, he thought, to doubt that that was intended to
convey that Lord Cardigan had been wanting in that per-
sonal courage necessary to the discharge of his duty. To
say that a soldier ordered to attack an enemy, much more a
general and a leader whose duty it was to lead others into
action, stopped short midway in the path which led to
danger, and perhaps to death, while others went in
without any obstacle or any cause to prevent them, must,
he was sure, convey to the mind of any military man, and
to the mind of aty man conversant with such matters,
an imputation of personal cowardice, disgrace, and dis-
honour. It was impossible, therefore, not to feel that this
was a matter of a most libellous character. Heaven forbid
that the time should ever come when the honour and repu-
tation of the soldiers and sailors engaged in the service of
this country should ever be unjustifiably assailed withou:
redress being opened to them. There could be na doubt, if this
were a true view, as he (the learned judge) thought it was,
that looking to the position of the parties, looking to the
importance of the service to which this passage had refer-
ence, the matter was one that would, probably, be the sub •

ject of a criminal information, unless some special cause
could be shown why a rule for a criminal information should
not be made absolute. Now, these reasons had been put
forward way the Court should not make the rule absolute

in this case. First, that the substance of the passage com-
plained of was true, or that at all events that the affidavits
that had been produced on the part of the defendant so
conflicted with those of the complainant, that the Court
could not take upon itself to try the matters on affidavit.
Secondly, it was said that at all events whether the state-
ments ware well or ill founded, it was written in reference
to a matter of public importance and public inte-

rest, a matter of history, that it was a privi-
leged matter, and not the subject matter of a
criminal iniormation. Thirdly, that the conduct
of the parties had been such that what had taken
place subsequently to the publication of the work had pre-

eluded the prosecutor from applying to the court success-
fully. He would deal briefly with these points in the order
in which they had been stated. In the first place it was
stated that substantially the statement contained in the
passace upon which this application was founded was true.
He must say he could not understand w;.at was meant by
any argument Pounded on that assertion. It turned iadeed
upon what was the true construction of the libel in
question. It, as was contended yesterday, all which that
passage cony yed was that Lord Cardigan, from some cause
_ _ .

Or other, was absent when his presence was desired, it migh

be said that, to a certain extent, it had been made ou
that that was true. But that, in his judgment, was not the
true character or meaning of this libellous passage. Ha
thought it was not the gist of the statement complained of
that Lord Cardigan was absent when his p; eseace as general
was much to be desired. The gist and sting of the libel was
this, that LA d Cardigan was absent, not from defect of
judgment, or from any accidental cause, but because he had
not the courage to face the danger, which the brave men
whom he led, did face, and nobly contend against. So that
it was incorrect to say that the substance of this charge was
true; and Col. Calthorpe had been, through his counsel,
constrained to say, that if that was the view, he was satis-
fied by the affidavits which had been filed, that his view was
incorrect, and that his statements were ill-founded. Then
with regard to the affidavits which had been adduced. It
was said that there was a conflict upon those affidavits, and
that the court could not try the question. There was no
conflict of any substantial character between the affidavits
of the prosecution and the defendant, but the defendant
seemed to give the go-by to the real question at issue. The
libel was that Lord Cardigan failed to reach the battery be-
cause he turned short halt-way in the path that
led to it. Colonel Caltliorp had admitted that
that was an erroneous and ill-founded statement.
He was constrained to admit that Lord Cardigan
did reach the battery, and that he passed through it, and
he meets the charge by saying that, admitting all, he
took the ground upon the statement that Lord Cardigan
came out of the battery sooner than he ought to have done.
But that was a totally different charge from that to which
the affidavits of the prosecutor were addressed. So that he
thought there was no conflict when the real nature of the
charge came to be considered. He should be sorry to lay
down any rule on this point as of universal application, or
to state what the Court would do in any c tee because there
were conflic,ing affidavits. It was true generally that the
Court would nut try questions upon affidavits but would
leave parties to their remedy; that however was not a rule
i
of universal application, and he saw no reason why n this case
the C ourc shouldnot make the rule absolute, if, looking to other
circumstances it was thought a fit one for a criminal infor-
mation. But it was said that whether the imputation was
true or not this was a case in which the defendant, writing
as an historian of the events of that campaign, had a right
to make such comments as Le pleased upon Lord Cardigan,
who had borne so conspicious a part in it ; but this again
must be taken with certain limitations. It was true that
the events in question were of the deepest public character
and importance. It was true that the conduct of the men
who were engaged in thosetransactions was fairly and legi-
timately matter of public. tie adverted to what had passed
between Col. Calthorpe and one of the friends authorised
by Lord Cardigan to negotiate on the matter, and wh:ch
altogether took away the foukdation on which this rule
was absolutely granted. Connected with this subject
was the destruction of 1,000 copits of the last edition,
a fact which was not known to the Court when the
application for a rule nisi was made; otherwise it might
have made a difference in the decision of the Court.
The learned Judge, having passed a high eulogium on the
military oareer of Loid Cardigan, said the rule must be dis-
missed, but without costs.
The other judges concurred.
Rule discharged.

COURT OF BANKRUPTCY.

(Before Mr. Commissioner Goulbutn.)

IN RE W, r. wAvaii.

His Honour to-day gave judgment on the question as to
whether this bankrupt, Colonel Waugh, formerly one of
the directors of the London and Eastern Bank, should be
allowed to surrender after having been outlawed. After a
long argument on Monday his honour, on the authority of
several cases quoted on behalf of the bankrupt by Mr.
Roxburgh, decided that the Court had the power to inter-
pose and aua pt the surrender. Mr. C. E. Lewis, on be-
half of the official liquidators of the London and Eastern
Bank, proceeded to show that, although the Court might
have the power it was discretionary, and he opposed ; but
his honour held that Mr. Lewis had no locus standi, but
left the question open whether a bankrupt could Le ad-
mitted to the privilege of surrendering, and by so doing
avoiding the penaltie' incident to outlawry in bankruptcy,
without bringing into Court all property he was possessed
of at the time of his bankruptcy. The bankrupt had ad-
mitted that when he left England he had £5OO which he
stated he had expended for the use of himself and family.
His Honour now referred to the main facts of the case,
and said it was one which showed to what extraordinary
lengths and to what awful depths a man might be led by
speculation, and the "making haste to get rich," without
his conskiering his duty to others. For years the bask-

rupt had held a very high station and position in society.
He had rank in the army, having served with great distinc-
tion, and to all appearance he was a man of fortune and
affluence. He embarked recklessly and improvidently in
the banking speculation. He was driven to quit the coun-
try, and now he appeared at the bar of the Court a pauper,
without health and without means, to petition for leave to
do that which he ought to have done years ago—disclose
the estate which he had. This certainly was a very melan-
choly position for a man of the bankrupt's antecedents. His
Honour concluded by saying he could not grant the prayer
of the petition unless the bankrupt brought the L5OO, or the
assignees consented to waive that requirement.
Mr. Linklater said he would communicate with the as-
signees, and the case was adjourned for a week.

CENTRAL CRIMINAL COURT—This Day.

---4-
OLD COURT.
(Before Mr. Baron Bramwell.)
CHARGE 01" MANSLAUGHTER.

Henry Short, shoemaker, was indicted for the man-
slaughter of James Sully. The jury found the prisoner
guilty, and the learned judge sentenced him to one month's
imprisonmrint.

Ann Doggett was indicted for the manslaughter of her
husband.

The deceased carried on the business of an ironmonger in
High street, Shoreditch, and his death was occasioned, it
was alleged, by the neglect of his wife (the prisoner).

The Learned Judge was of opinion that tho evidence
offered was not sufficient to establish the charge, and the
jury accordingly returned a verdict of not guilty.

NE W COURT.
(Before the Recorder.)
THE ROBBERY AT LORD CHESHAM'S.

Roderick O'Lochlin. and Arthur Hewitt were indicted
for feloniously breaking and entering the house of Charles
Compton Cavendish, Baron Chesham, and stealing there-
from a large quantity of plate, jewellery, watches, and
ether property valued at upwards of £l,lOO.
The prisoners were captured by the police as they were
getting over the garden wall of his lordship's house in Gros-
venor-square.
The jury found them both guilty. They were ticket-of-
leave men.
The Recorder said as they had life-preservers upon their
pc, sons, it was evident they had provided for any resis
tance, and as they had both before been sentenced to penal
servitude for four years, he should on the present occasion
sentence O'Lochlin to le and Hewitt to 15 years penal ser-
vitude.

POLICE INTELLIGENCE—This Day.

MARLBOROUGH-STREET.

ARTFUL MODE OF PICKING A SHOPKEEPER'S POCKET.
—John Freeman, a fellow who refused his address, was
charged with picking the pocket of Mrs. Sarah Stevens, the
wife of Mr. Stevens, stationer, 14, Duke-street, Grosvenor-
square, of a purse containing £1 12s. 81d. under the follow-
ing circumstances :
It appeared from the evidence that prisoner went into
Mr. Stevens' shop about nine o'clock the previous night
and asked to see a visite card. Mrs. Stevens took ono from
the window, and the prisoner objected to the price, and
asked to see another. Mrs. Stevens took a second card
from the window, and while doing so prisoner said, " What
a fuss you are making." Mrs. Stevens then felt her dress
trod on, and directly after the prisoner bolted out of the
shop, when Mrs. Stevens missed her purse from her pocket,
containing the sum of LI 12s. 81d. She told her errand-
boy to pursue the prisoner, and he did so, Mr, Alfred
Murray, staymaker, of Duke-street, also joining in the
pursuit, and sees the prisoner throw the purse away in
his flight. Lazarus Howes, 95 C, then came up and took
the prisoner into custody, when the prisoner, with much
coolness, asked the constable " Whether anything was the
matter ?"

Inspector Charles Bowles asked for a remand that
inquiries might be made to see if prisoner was known.
The prisoner was committed for trial, but will be again
brought up.
COMMITTAL WITHOUT A FINE FOR A 'RUFFIANLY
ASSAULT ON A FEMALE.—John M‘Donald, a fellow who
gets his living by hawking books about the neighbourhood
of the Haymarket, was charged before Mr. Tyrwhitt with
the following cowardly assault on a female named Oates,
residing in Rathbone-place :
The complainant, a young married woman, said she was
on her way to see an invalid female, and when crossing the
cop of the Haymarket, having at the time a bottle of port
wine under her shawl, the prisoner asked her to buy a book
of him. She refused, and the prisoner then struck her a
violent blow on the chest with his fist, breaking her brooch,
smashing the bottle, and hurting her a good deal. A con-
stable then came up, to whom she gave the prisoner in
charge.
Sergeant Allen, 20 C, said that when he took the prisoner
into custody several gentlemen said the prisoner had vio-
lently stru'k the complainant.
Mr. Tyrwhitt having made some severe remarks on the
prisoner's cowardly conduct, committed him for six weeks
with hard labour.