The Sun.
London, England, 1839-10-18 00:00:00

PUBLICATIONS.

A "r
TRANSLATION of the BIBLE
irnpos "ri Yeu may be assured that, deeply sensible of the dutie
to thee- upon me, and more especially of that which binds me
1' support of the Established Church, I shall always use the
th4wtera vested in me by the Constitution for the fulfilment of
of th4cred obligation."—Her Majesty's Answer to the Address
i, 7,9llLords.—The Weekly Dispatch, Sunday, July 14, 1839.
rneot
t_ e favour and the love of Heaven, we. have great art;
toww think in a peculiar manner . propitious and propen in„
Unit "n s. Why else was this nation chosen before
.any other,
tnnn?,,11,,t,,0f her, as out of Sion, should be proclaimed and
rturo.'forth the first tidings and trumpet of reformation to all
Vcr,;e':--Areopagitica Milton.
" Inetss,nall here' 'exhibit to the country, that for the great
parch, "re of truth which we enjoy," we are indebted to Mo-
A----11 ri,ghtly so—they were "thepeople 's trust."
ncio„ t,n,e King's—( Henry the Eighth's)—proceedings
him,
n ..ne pope that he was to expect no change. in_
n
anstll.4„lished at ength the Bull of • Excommunication,pba; ,
Pithiisireteid in 1533. As soon as Henry heard oftthewßeuar
again
illtiooeslat?onn" t,l'e Papal authority. At the same time,
.
ik,
11,es
to b e
.1 ed,
being
ce ; °` the 811 being presented to him, he ordered
11, 'lnd there
Pe °'rer allsatisfied that nothing ss ould
Itiii'el?rafton, the
Christendom.t()ospupripnort the exhorbitant power assumed by the
printer, printed 1,500 at his own charge,
l' 410.41.4(nnited to 500/. !"—History of England, by Rapin,
iti't‘fill64 cattle the r *g of Queen Elizabeth ;
'4 hi,it'or'"w that she had great worldly glory. I have seen her
llie°Ple 7',.,and I have read of her in those pageants, when the
Nye, .1. r‘ngland surrounding lier, and the leading gentry her
14vi ? wbil: her glorious flag was unstained on land, and floated
N,,. WC .
, vls ... Sry every sea. I know all this, and I know that female
're nt irse often the t tviumphant—t Hear )—and I trust we
~t.'ll...7heginnin sone now.—(Loud and continued cheer-
'' th; - -1 full Reportgof of
the Proceedings of the Great Meeting
2:,,,611:1; iLayeotiaodtfh:
joliiicys,
loßf39L.oond n, held at Freemason's Hall, on the
Edited. by Daniel O'Connell, m.p._
f, P,I. 'n and Dublin Weekly Orthodox Journal, No.
, 9.
rll&elti°d 7.1 Y do we owe to the happy Reformation all the do-
-Ib7te'3, ~,•!'ntag'es by which we are distincruished above other
;4-e,letit „:.`„it is also to the Reformation we are indebte”d for our
pion, r""tinal consequence and territorial grandeur. . . . .
a:ite ei,'Prung up the mighty Elizabeth, and mingling her
1-eintl - is a 8
over *gn with the preservation of the true faith,
the secure g herself to theei- • st of Reformation ; on that vessel
of
ly rod
her
kin d rode smtoarrom, mainmast
established the independence
th iiii,qg orn. —The Times ; The Sun, No. 14,628, 1839.
i: e di, yace next adviseth the Reader not to.be.offended with.
eon, ersitio of
translators nor with the ambiguity of translate
4411 I.i. • ' • Nor hereby' professing this to be so absolute
ok eittl4Blt4wllli_lasatahat hereafter might follow, no other that m
to 4 Go,'.'. yet was not understood. For there be yet
(I,44terityPnie,tallyery many dark places, which without doubt
that •herein •
be made much more open. For why s.ho.uld he
the G
rj'ng the Gospel was delivered to this intent,
-"e Cri doubt I,titterly understood by us, yea to the very inch.
1:"'" Nl3el shall b that. such things as remain yet unknown in
Are e. hereafter ma .e open to the latter wits of
„ ce 1,1 to their clear understanding."—Bishopf Parker's
b„ _Quee.li...?.Tzranslation by command 016Q047en Elizabeth.
„tii(arn,,,qt,,_9.l. abeth
.dying March 24, was succeeded
th; Of the Sixth, King of Scotland, as next heir to the Crown
r tinwt,tueen's nomination. Accordingly no sooner was
°WI.' b-"" come up to London to take possession of the
'ilif. En 't
but an humble petition of the Ministers of the Church
4a),43,a,t'ci1e....,a5_ they_ styled themselve.s, was presented to his
4::oe chu!,,ing reformation of certain cerenoniesar.d abuses
Afklesty , that they,'
. In the preamble to the petition, i they told his
4:iety,s
at?. t.hey, to the. number of more than ,000aofhi L„ Q buta.."°Pcts. and ministers, all groaning as under. com-
ity .l)Thie them of rites and ceremonies, did with joint consent th• `uernSelves at his Majesty's feet' to be eased and relieved
thrkt is belialf•
atoned
, and that their humble suit to his Majesty wa ,
ee offences following, me
some might be removed, so
' ad some qualified. Theso offences were, Ist, in the

" University Education." " The great resorts and seats of
learning often outlive in this way the intentions of founders, as
the world outgrows them. Our Universities are, in a great
measure, become cisterns to hold, not conduits, to disperse,
knowledge. The age has the start of them, that is, other
sources of knowledge have been opened since their formation, to
which the world have had access, and have drank plentifully at
these living fountains, from which they are debarred by the
tenor of their Charter, and as a matter of dignity and privilege.
All that has been invented or thought in the last two hundred
years they take no cognizance of, or as little as possible, they
are above it, they stand upon the ancient land-marks, and will
not budge, whatever was not known when they weriendowed, they
are still in profound and lofty ignorance of."—flazlitt's Table
Talk: also, the Examiner, Jan. 20, 1828.
"Let the Noble Viscount persevere in the course—i. e., re-
sisting the demands of, and braving the direction of Radicals—
which he had resolved upon taking, and then let him trust to
the good sense of the people of this country for support.'
Such were the words in which the Duke o Wellington ex-
pressed his confidence in the sincerity of Lo ctMelbourne."—
The Times, July 1, 1839.
"It was said by the Noble Duke ellington) that those
opinions were contrary to the opinions neld by the University
o. Oxford. He ( Viscount Melbourne) had great respect for
that University, but he could not admit that the University of
Oxford was to be infallible in these matters. On the contrary,
it was well known that the opinions of the Reformers who
brought about the Reformation in the Church were entirely
opposed to the University of 03 ford. It was well known, that
if the opinions of that Unive 'city had been adhered to, the
Protestant religion would 11001.11 aye been established. The
opinions of Locke were opposed to those of the University; and
if their opinions only were to be consulted, everything liberal,
noble, and ingenuous in our institutions would never have been
established."—Viscount Melbourne's Speech in the House of
Lords, on the debate on the Errl of Radnor's motion respecting
the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge.—The Morning
Herald, Friday, Dec. 22, 1837.
" We observe in a pamphlet, ' Anti-Deist,' published by
Mr. Bellamy, that Exodus, c. iii, v. 22, is a gross mistransla-
tion. He notices a number of other errors in the translation
of the Bible now in use, equally hostile to the true meaning of
the writers. It is not a little curious, that many of these mis-
translated passages, which give meanings in direct opposition to
the real ones, have been as stoutly defended by eminent theo-
logians as any in the whole took, and long commentaries have
been written upon them, expressly to show their beauty and
propriety. -The Examiner, Dec. 24, 1821.

Mr. Bellamy, in a very conclusive performance, the Anti-
Deist, does not attempt to parry the weapon, so much as to
disarm the hand that wields it ; for he does not explain away
the objections that have been advanced by the Deist, but he
labours rather to extirpate them, and to show that they have no
other root but misconception o: mistake. Should this author's
emendations turn out correct, they should be adopted, as no
time and no authority can consecrate error. Mr. Bellamy has
met with patronage in the very highest quarter—a patronage
liberal in every sense of the word; and as honourable to the
patron as the author."_

" His alterations, I admit, are extremely numerous, im-
portant, and consequential, but they are supported by a mass of
erudition, authority, and argument, that does indeed demand
our most serious attention, and many in common with mrelf,
will lament that they have drank more freely at the stream,
than at the fountain."

We hail the march of intellect, because we know—that a
reason that is cultivated, is the best support of a worship that
is pure. It is for thos' who thrive by the darkness to hurl
their anethemas against the diffusion of light; but wisdom, like
a pure and bright conductor, can render harmless the brutura
fulmen' of the Vat;can."—Lacon, C. C. Colton.
" I may therefore conclude, that upon this revision of the
Hebrew Scriptures, great stress ought to be laid, as anticipat-
ing a closer approximation in sentiment among all denomina-
tions of Christians now at variance with each other, upon cer-
tain disputed points of doctrine—under this impression, I think
all must subscribe to its importance."—Chester Chronicle, Feb.
20, 1824.

,
" We may be sure that sufficient care has been taken that
the Holy Scriptures should contain nothing unsuitable to the
character or dignity of God, and that God should say nothing
of himself which should derogate from his own Majesty."—
Milton's Posthumous Ti eatise.
" Mr. Carlisle then read the names of several of the sub-
scribers, beginning with the Prince Regent, who at first sub-
scribed only for five copies ; but, pleased with the specimens of
the translations forwarded to him by the gentleman in ques-
tion, had increased that number to fifty. This anecdote he
had from 111 r. Bellamy himself, who was; ntimately acquainted
with Dr. Clarke, the Prince's librarian. Here Mr. Carlisle
iterated his argument, arising from the discrepancy of the two
translations, and the consequent fallibility, at least, of one
version."

Mr. Carlisle's trial for publishing " Palmer's Principles of
Nature," Court of king's Bench, Guildhall, Friday, Oct.
15.—The Times, Saturday, Oct. 16, 1825.
To CORRESPONDENTS.—" The Bible.—We have been so
earnestly exhorted to persevere in opening our Paper to the dis-
cussion of the merits of the New Translation, as a question of
the utmo t importance to the interests of mankind, that we feel
it to be our duty to comply. Our Correspondents, therefore,
shall be attended to in turn, as we have reason to believe that
the Heads of the Church have already directed their attention
to the controversy."—The Sun, London, Saturday, Dec. 5,
1513.

" Surely the elevated patronage which this New Translation
has deservedly obtained, should operate as a general example
and incitement. Shall the Bible, with its many acknowledged
errors, descend to posterity polluted with all those errors; or
shall it be transmitted to the latest generations of mankind,
with as much of its original purity as it is po,sible for human
sagacity, knowledge, and diligence to elucidate and confirm."--
The Sun, Monday, November 23d, 18'8. The Sun, Septem-
ber 30th, October 7th, and 28th, 1837. The Guide, March
18th, and 25th, 1838. The Sun, December 27, 1838, Feb. 5,
1839.

" Published in 1818 and 1819. Parts 1 and 2, price 245.
each. dedicated by permission to his Royal Highness the Prince
of Wales, as Regent.

" The New Translation of the Holy Bible, containing the
three books of the Pentateuch, Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, and
reconciling the numerous discrepancies in Jerome's and the
European versions."
Part 3d in 'lB2l, containing from Numbers to Deuteronomy.
Part 4th in 1825, containing from Joshua, c. 1. to 1 Samuel,
0. 13. v. 5.

Part sth in 1831, containing from 1 Samuel, c. 13. v. 6. to
Kings, c. 17. v. 11.
Part 6th in 1834, containing from 2d Kings, c. 17. v. 12 to
Job, c. 18. v. 21.
Part 7th in !835, containing from Jolt, c. 18. v. 22. to
Psalms, c. 50.

The Anti-Deist, in answer to the publication called the
Deist, containing also a refutation of the erroneous opinions
held forth in the Age of Reason, and in a recent publication,
entitled Researches on Ancient Kingdoms, 1819, price 4s.
First and Second Replies to the Quarterly Review, showing
the gross errors the Reviewer has made in his Remarks on the
New Translation of the Bible.
" I now proceed to examine the passage which the Reviewer
has adduced to prove how grossly I have erred in translating
the word gnaaroumin, prudent, instead of naked ; which is in
Job, c. 22. v. 6. And stripped the naked of their clothing.
This is, perhaps, one of the passages which he deems elegant,'
simple, and dignified.' It is ' simple' enough, surely ; and
such simple passages abounding in the common version have in
all ages excited the wonder of intelligent men. ' Stripped the
naked of their clothing !' In the name of common sense, if
they were naked, how could they be stripped ?"—Extracts. See
Classical Journal, No. 38.
A Refutation of the Erroneous Opinions, promulgated by a
Right Rev. Bishop of London. —See Classical Journal, No. 1.
A Reply to the Right Rev. Bishop of St. David's. See
Classical Journal, No. 26.
The True Age of Christ at the Crucifixion, not 33 but 52i
years, price ls.
Biblical Criticisms in each quarterly part, in the years, 1810,
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, and 17, of the Classical Journals,
by JOHN BELLAMY.

SPECIMENS OF EMENDATIONS, AND TENOR OF
REPLIES.
Genesis, c. 11. v. 4. Jerome's Version.—And they said,
go to, let us build us a city, and a tower, whose top may reach
Unto heaven.

New Translation.—Hebrew.—And they said, come, let us
build a city and tower, with his top Like unto heaven.
"An undertaking as impious as it was foolish, an attempt to
build a tower which should reach to heaven !"
Origines ; or, Remarks on the Origin of several Empires,
States, and Cities. By the Right Hon. Sir W. Drummond.—
The Literary Gazette, May 28, 1825.
r‘ The tower of Babel whose top was to reach to heaven,'
and the confusion of tongues;' the sacrifice of Isaac and
Jeptha's daughter; the true age of Christ at the crucifixion.' u
—Enquiries into Vulgar and Common Errors.
The works of Sir Thomas Brawn, Knight, M.D., of Nor-
wich, 1686.
Authorised Version, Deuteronomy, chap. 14, v. 22 :—" Thou
shalt truly tithe all the increase of thy seed."
" It is a well-known maxim of English law, suggested by
common sense, and recognised by every principle of justice, to

infer, that the long and uninterrupted enjoyment of a civil
right must have originated in a regular grant from the original
owner, although no express evidence can be produced of
existence of such conveyance." On Tithes.—Quarterly Re-
view, No. 53.
New Trans'ation :—" A tenth thou shalt tenth, of all the
increase of toy seed." Note--Onkelos, the most eminent •f
all the learned Rabbis, who lived before the dispersion of the
Hebrews, and consequen4 made the translation of the Sacred
Volume into Chaldee at that period when the Hebrew was a
national language, he thus translates the clause—gnasaara
tignsarah, " a tenth thou shalt tenth," which is the same as
the Hebrew. The Septuagint 6eif.9;-rev. ev.Voo.sx.:o-tocri (both
Alexandrine and Vatican) " a tenth thou shalt tenth." The
learned Selden, Le Clerc, and other great authorities on
tithes, say—" It is not likely that the Levites should have had
a tenth of the whole produce of the land, because the number
of the tribe of Levi, compared with the numbers of the other
tribes, was so trifling. Neither could it be of all the produce
of the land, but of the increase of the seed; as it is truly said
in the common version : for the increase must necessarily have
been that part of the produce after the seed employed to give
the increase, had been returned to the grower out of the gross
produce ; etherwise it could not have been said it was the " in-
crease of the seed."
" When the harvest had beene ended, and all gathered, then
the husbandman laid aside his great themma, otherwise called
the first fruits of his threshing floore, of which it bath beene
spoken in chapter on first fruits; which, though it were one
of ten, in respect of that portion which the Levites received,
yet it was but one of a hundred in respect of the husbandman's
tocke, who payed the Levites; the Levites payed a tenth por-
tion unto the Priests ; this they termed Magnasher mim-ham-
magnasher, the tithe of the tithes, Neh. x. 38. The Pharises
would pay a tenth, Matt. xxiii. 23 ; and hence it is that they
boasted, They gave tithes of all that they possessed, Luke
xviii. 12."—Civil and Ecclesiastical Rites, used by the ancient
Hebrews. Dedicated to tha Earl of Pembroke, Chancellor of
the University of Oxford. By Thomas Godwyn, 8.D., 1634.
" Add to this, that by the tenth part of the lands must ne-
cessarily be meant the tenth part of the profits ; which must
be owned to be a very forced interpretation, especially in a
primordial act such as this."—Page 111, Rapin's History of
England. See The Sun, Nos. 14,628-14,662.
"No mention, Bishop Barlow observes, is made of tithes
in the grand codes of canons, ending in the year of our Lord
457, (which, next to the Bible, he considers as the most au-
thentic book in the world). During all that period, there-
fore, both the clergy and Church appear to have been sup-
ported by the free gifts and other oblations of the pious."—See
Selden on Tithes, and Barb. Rem. 169.
" Tithes, from the Saxon word Teoda, which signifies the
tenth part of a thing, may be defined to be the tenth part of
the increase yearly, arising and renewing from -the profits of
land, the stock upon lands, and the personal industry of the in-
habitants.-2 Black. Corn. 24.
" The King, Henry the Fourth, representing to the Parlia-
ment his great want of an extraordinary aid, the Commons
went in a body and addressed him, That without burdening
his people he might supply his occasions by seizing the revenues
of the clergy. The Archbishop of Canterbury resisted—the
Commons brought in a Bill to seize the clergy's revenues—
the solicitations of the Archbishop were so prevalent with-the
Lords, that they threw out the Bill, so the Commons were
forced to find other means to supply the king's occasions ; the
clergy granted a tenth and a half. —Page 495.
"The- Commons, willing to comply with the King's
(Henry V.) demand of a subsidy, presented an address, praying
him to seize the clergy's revenues. The clergy perceiving
their ruin inevitable, came to the resolution to resign a part of
their riches to the King in order to save the rest."—Page 509,
Rapin's History of England.
" It has been presumptuous," so we read in the pithy Exam-
iner, No. 789, "to dabble in chemistry; to look through a te-
lescope ; to innoculate for thesmall-pox ; to abate the virulence
of a pestilential disorder by the salutary assistance of a cow ;
lastly, and we trust the argument will be deemed conclusive--
to read the Bible. And in what has all this presumption gene-
rally consisted? In the anxiety of some men to know more
than it was convenient for other men they should know. The
moment the daring inquirer discovered a truth--a truth !—which
threatened to militate against a profitable system of error, then
the awful secrets' were invaded—the ark of the sanctuary'
disturbed. Any Barabbas of the day was milk-white compared
with the daring offender : in a word, away with him." Could
great men thunder,' says Shakspeare, ' there would be nothing
but thunder.' Could they make a thirst for knowledge sinful
and presumptuous, there wou'd be a most inconvenient multipli-
cation of awful secrets.' "
Having new emerged from the honourable estimation in the
community, we take leave to mention a few whose great names
gave permanency to the system.
" Pro:est." " In our opinion, therefore, the land is subjected
to a direct taxation, amounting on the rent, tithe, and poor-rate,
to 33 per cent. !"
On the amendment of the Duke of Wellington upon the Corn
Bill. Signed Duke of Newcastle, Earls Rosslvn and Lauder.
dale.—Journal of the House of Lords.—The Times, June 5
1827.

" It would shake the foundation of all property in the king-
dom."—Mr. Peel.—The News, Sunday, May 23, 11125.
" Because he had an apprehension and timidity." Mr.
O'Connell, Herald, Dee. 2, 1836.
Authorised Text.-1 Kings, c. xvii. v. 4.—" Thus it shall
be, thou (Elijah) shalt drink of the brook, and I have vim-
manded the ravens to feed thee there."
Hebrew —New Translation, Part V.—" Thus it shall be,
thou (Elijah) shall drink of the brook, and I have commanded
the Arabians to supply thee there."
V. 6.—" There the Arabians brought for him bread and
flesh in the morning," &c.
Ist Samuel, c. v., Authorized Version.—" Saul abode in Gi-
beah, under a tree in Ramah."
New Translation—" Now Saul abode by Gibeah in the
grove by Ramah." Classical Journal, p. 203, No. 5 for
April, 1811.
Twenty-eight years since this emendation was submitted to
notice. Therehas been uncommon apathy, or ignorance in our
ouncils.

Specimen of emendations to be introduced in Part VIII. :
Song of Solomon, authorized version, chap. Ist, v. 4.---" I
am black, but comely, 0 yo daughters of Jerusalem, as the
tents of Kedar, as the curtains of Solomon."
Neither in this verse, nor Isaiah, chap. 42, v. 11, is the word
" Kedar"—" mourning"—translated.
New Translation—" I am the dawning light, as the compa-
nion of peace, when the habitation of the daughters of Jerusa-
lem is as the tabernacles of mourning."—See Clasical Journal,
No. 30, for June 1817 ; the Examiner, No a. 3, 1822 ; the
Examiner, Sept. 2, 1827 • the Courier, April 23, 1839.
Disturbing the Classical Journals of 1811 and 1817, on the
shelves of the Universities, must be like disturbing bones in
catacombs.

"May the diffusion of knowledge, the increase of religion
and morality, and the augmented happiness of the people,
make the present reign (era) more glorious than triumphs in
the field have rendered those that preceded it, and peace have
her victories no less renowned than war."

Reasons in favour of a New Translation ef the Holy Scrip.
tures. By Sir James Bland Burgess, Bart. 1819.
The matter is highly deserving of attention. It is a
question of no less magnitude than the choice between a blind
adhesion to error, and a pure and perfect knowledge of the re-
vealed law of God. Which of these is preferable—which of
them is it no less the interest than it is the duty of every rea-
sonable being to adopt—cannot admit of a doubt. In such a
case let us not be alarmed by any vain fear of temporary in-
convenience, which ought not for a moment to weigh against
the permanent and incalculable advantages attendant on such
a measure. Let us, on the other hand, entertain a lively, and,
I trust, a well-founded hope, that those who govern our Church
and State, may be pleased to take the matter into consi-
deration, andl irect an immediate revision of our Received
Version, or, what might perhaps be more recommendable, a
New Translation of the Original Text."—Extracts.
A Reply to the Rev. Mr. Todd's Vindication of our Trans-
lation and Translators of the Bible. By Sir James Bland
Burgess, 1820.
" I certainly, therefore, should have considered them as alto-
gether undeserving of a reply, had they not been employed as
a vehicle of much illiberal personality, to which the writer has
affected to give an additional weight, by ostentatiously an-
nouncing himself in his title-page, as Keeper of the Arch-
bishop of Canterbury's Records,' and by dating his preface from
The Library, Lambeth Palace.' "
" Such were the birth and parentage of our received ver-
sion, as asserted by Mr. Todd himself, and proved by his own
testimony ! No further comment on it is necessary." Suo
sibi gladio hunt jugalo.
" Resting on this evidence, I leave this charge, and with it
the whole of Mr. Todd's Vindication of our authorised transla-
tion and translators, than which a more meagre, crude, and
unsatisfactory performance, was never obtruded on the public."
" The charge of Socinianism is a mere stale hacknied trick
of miserable controversialists, when they are reduced to tho
paltry shift of calling names, in the hope of thereby escaping
from the effect of arguments, which they are incapable of an-
swering. Does not he know that it was employed against Le
Clerc ? Did he never hear of a similar charge made against our
immortal Locke ? If such artifices were used against men of
their exalted characters, I can have no pretension to expect a
more liberal treatment."

" some may say, Let us introduce no change, for we cannot
tell what further changes may be required of u4.'—Had this
been listened to, neither the Reformation nor the Revolution
could have taken place, and we should have been still subject to
Romish superstition, and to despotic power."
" On the side of those who advocate the necessity of a New
Translation rests the whole weight of facts and arguments. Let
not these be counteracted by less worthy considerations ; let us
not leave to the enemies of Christianity the only weapons by
which it can be assailed; but let us cordially and sincerely
unite with the learned and pious prelate Archbishop New-
combe, in the prayer with which he concludes his preface,
May the all-wise God, in His fit time, dispose the Sovereign
of the first Protestant Churches, and of the most learned
countries in the world, to complete his true acts of piety, by
promoting equal attention to the English Bible !' "—Extracts.
The Sun, January 28th, 1839, contains an appeal te her
Most Gracious Majesty.
Digest of the proceeding, publishing, and publicity of the
Work. The Classical Journal, from 1810 te 1818-1818 the
appearance of the First Part. The Sun, Nos. 8,1814,192.
Review of, and Rejoinder of the Quarterly Review. Reply to,
and Rejoinder from the Author to Quarterly Review.-1819,
First and Second Part of Anti-Deist. Second Part —lB2O, Cri-
tical Examination of the Objections of Mr. Whitaker, A.M.,
Cambridge. Reasons in favour of a New Translation of the
Holy Scriptures. A Reply to the Reverend Mr. Todd's Vin-
dication of our Authorized Translation and Translators of the
Bible.-1821. The Examiner, Dec. 24, 1821. Mr. Bella-
my's Reply to S. Lee, A.M., Professor
of Arabic in the Uni-
versity of Cambridge. Third Part.-1822. Computations in
the Examiner, No. 771.—Aug., Oct., Nov.-1823. Nos, 785,
786, 793. 801, 803.-1824. Nos. 834, 640, 845. In 1825.
Fourth Part. The Times, Saturday, Oct. 16.-1825. The
Durham Chronicle, Saturday, July 16. The Liverpool Sa-
turday Advertiser, July 23 ; and the Norwich Mercury, Satur-
day, August 13, 1825. In 1827.—N05. 1,021, 1,022. The
Examiner, Vol. 111., No. 34 and No. 69. Galway Indepen-
dent, 1828, Nos. 1,049, 1,050, 1,057.—The Examiner. In
1831, Part sth ;in 1834, Part 6th ; in 1835, Part the 7th. In
4n8,2,N014.
,61046,4.47.N015n.
14,625.1839—
1837—The Sun, Nos. 14,056, 14,062, and 14,080.. In 1838—
The Guide, N0154.,44688,.491.4,417'5h,e
IS4u,
11651'4 652 14 653 14,662, to the latter we lay no pre-
tension, 1..
Julyo°lr4t,
the insertions each, issuing 3,500 per day—are from
souls of kindred fire—who in this glorious field fight together
with us in our chivalry—who have allied themselves with us
in this arduous strife to " do that deed which shall gild our
humble names."
To decry supineness on the part of her Majesty's Govern-
ment in not acting upon the precedent of James the First as de-
reliction of duty, would be fustian and farrago ; the precedent
any longer laying in abeyance is tantamount to misprision of
treason.
By Appointment : Budd and Calkindßo, and
oksellersßtroohwenr, Ma-
jesty,
Paul's,jesty London,Pail
Pail-mall;. Longman, Rees,rnae