The Sun.
London, England, 1863-09-21 00:00:00

THAMES.

THE THIEF AND RECEIV ER,—CONVICTION OF A
MARINE STORE DEALER.—Arthur Gates, a labourer, and
Jonas Lyons, a marine store dealer, were brought before Mr.
Partridge, the former with stealing a bag containing rags,
the property of his employer, and the other with feloniously
receiving the property, well knowing it to be stolen.
Mr. Stoddart, solicitor, defended Lyons.
Mr. John Taylor, rag merchant, of No. 37, Green-street,
Stepney, stated that on Saturday, the 12th inst., about
mid-day he sent his man Gatos with 41 bags of rags to the
South-Eastern Railway. He subsequently ascertained one
bag of rice had been stolen. It had not been recovered.
On Saturday morning last he asked Gates what
he had done with the missing bag of rags.
After some hesitation, the prisoner said he had
lost the bag. He then said to him, " How came you to
take a pass from the South Eastern Railway Company to
go out at the gates with the bag—they let you out with a
portion of the load you ought to have delivered there." The
prisoner said nothing to that. He then touched the feelings
of the prisoner, and again asked him what he had done with
the bag of rags. " Gates replied, I have sold it ; I will take
you to the man's house." He proceeded with police-con-
stable Dunaway, a detective officer, No. 129 H, to the
house of the prisoner Lyons, in North-street, Batty-street,
Commercial-road. He asked Lyons if he had bought any
rags of gates. Lyons said he had bought nothing of the
kind, On the way to the station-house Lyons told Duna-
way that he had purchased a seek full of rags, such as
those described. He asked Lyons to show him
the rags, and he said "No, I cannot do that;
I have sold rags of that character since then, last
Saturday." Lyons then offered to pay him for the rags
He refused to accede to those terms. After Lyons was
looked up he went with. Dunaway to his premises in
North-street, and searched the place,. The rags could not
be found. The value of the bag of rags was SI 13s. Gates
said that Lyons gave him 17s. for the rags, only a little
more than half the value.

In cross-examination by Mr. Stoddart, the prosecutor said
he first discovered a deficiency a day or two after he sent
Gates to the South Eastern Rai:way. The rags censistkd
of new linen cuttings. Porter William Dunaway, an in-
telligent detective officer, confirmed all the material parts
of Mr. Taylor's evidence, and produced a book of entries,
and said there was no entry in that book of the pur-
chase of rags. Lyons admitted to him that he gave
the prisoner Gates 17s. for the rags, and that he
had made no entry of the purchase in his book. In answer
to Mr. Stoddart, the officer said he had known Lyons five
years, and believed he had never been in trouble before.
He never heard any complaint against Lyons.
Gates, on being called on far hie defence, said--I plead
guilty.
Mr. Stoddart admitted that his client had incautiously
purchased the rags of Gates, and hoped the magistrate
would take into consideration the fact that Lyons had a
large family to maintain, and had been in business five
years without a complaint being made against him.
Mr. Partridge said this was a bad case—a robbery of an
employer by his servant, He sentenged Gates to two
months' imprisonment and hard labour. He advised Lyons
to be more careful in future, xnd fined him £5.
The penalty was instantly paid.