The Sun.
London, England, 1808-04-09 00:00:00

Sir C. POLE adverted to the building of a home for

Dr. B. Clarke, as Auditor to the Asylum, an office,
the duty of which may be performed b) any of the
. .
Clerks from I)is Majesty's Yards at Deptford or
Woolwich, being wily the iegulatton of the accounts
of the expenditure for 60 boys and 40 girls. This
housu and two acres of 'hind. annexed, he looked
upon as an unnecessary expence.,„
• The CHANCBLLOit of the -4XCLIE6tUER admitted
the propriety of having the Estimates required, and
suggested lodic, Hon. Baronet to move for therm..
Sir -J. Nu‘spowr thought it sufficient to grant
0001. for the present for carrying on the building.
Thu proposition of Sir 3. NEwroaT was agreed.to,
and the Report was ordered to be.received onMun-

day.,
Mr. HORNER ,gave notice, that on Monday he
should move an Addres. to ht. Majesty, relAtive to
fee:, on licences.
On the Motion of Mr. FlusictsSoN, it was °I-tiered
that the House; should, at its rising, adjourn to Mon-
day.
Sir Jour; Newrottr,, with a view to call the at-

tension of the House to the, restraint of abuse.apd
improper etpenditure,, moved for a variety :of Ac-
counts relative to the building, rind the.-condOet of
the Officers of the Iribli Lir,en Hall; which were or,
dered. He adverted to the appointment of a College
Youth to the office of an: Inspedor of I..itieus, an
office which ought to be, ked only by persons bred
to the business. He forbore making any motion till
the faa should be ascertained.
Mr. WARD presented an ,Account of the Balance
of the ,Coniolidated Fund remaining in the Lulle.
quer at the disposal of Government.
Mr. HUSKL*BOI4 gave notice, that he would on

Monday. its the' Committee of Ways and Means,
move that this.Balkince be applied, to the serytco of
the year.

RUSSIAN PAPERS.

Mr. IPIIITBiIEAD rose pursuant to his notice,
to move for certain Papers, to which the attention
of the House had been called by the Noble Lord on
the other side (I ,ord G. L. Gower), in hts Skeet),
on a Motion brought for Ward by adHon. Friend of
his (Mr. Sharpe), on the '2.9tli day of March. .He
had no nesitation to say, that the practice of read-
ing or citing extracts tram Dispatches or other Pa-
pers, not before Parliament, was exceedingly ink-
COMM towards the 1-lOttse and the Public, and ex-
ceedingly unjust towards ',the indWiduals who eniy
be atfetled by these - citatibms.• However his Ma-
jesty's Ministers may be disposed to arrogate the
right to themselves, he . did not suppose they
would allow any other -.individuals to usurp • their
pterogative,, and therefore it was that' he thought
the pradice particularly censurable in the Noble
Lord. The Hon. Gentleman opposite had frequent 7
lycontended that. much injury watidone to the Br'.
tish cause. on the Comittent, by the indiscreet disclo-
sure ot confidentialdiplomatic communications. Rut
they fotget their own doetrine as.toou as it answered
any purpose to dvart from it, and -not only they
themselves, but persons in Ito situation's to warrant
the least pretensions to, soch liberty, made what
disclosures'they pleased: He adverted to the ve-
ry indiscreet communication of Papers of the Most
confidential nature, valuntarily au unnecessarily
made, without army selediou or distindeere , by
i Lord Mulgruve at. the closecloseof the Austrian w ar.
aerkle thougut that example ought- to be a warning
to all, more patticularly to those convected wan
that Noble Loid. The Noble Lord opposite, had,
boy/trier, fallen into the :same error, and as the only
-means of remedying the evil, he should move for
two important Papers, particularly referred to. The
Noble Lord, in order to thew that Russia might
now have been at war with us, even if the Bxpedi-
non, te Copenhagen had never talc= place, had cited
what was called an unilateral article of the Treaty of
Alliance, signed .at St. Pewsburgh, tlth
1806, in which article the Emperor of. Russia pro-
fessed his determination* to use his influence with his
Britannic Majesty to alter any thing which, in ,a
Congress of the Powers of Europe, to be held for that
purpose, may be deemed contrary to justice, and to
the principles of the Laws of Nations. So anxious
was the Administration of that.day for the coalition
that ended with the Battleol Austerlitz, that it• was
willing to allow..even the principles of our maritime
superiority, the So much talked of foundation of our
power and existence, to be brought into question,
in order to bring it about. (Here Mr.' Whitbread
went into a detail of -the Stipulations of the Treaty
of St. Petersbergh, and the circumstances attend-
. ing „that 'Treaty, and the events of the War that
followed, which being tbreigu. to the subject before
thellouse, we do nut think it mit:eatery to repeaty)
Subsequent to the signature of that Treaty, M.
NOVOSIitAOII was.k'llt art a pretended' pacific mis,
sion, but really- with no view to peace; and it Would
have been quite as, reasonable fur the French Etupe-
. roe to ask that. Negotiator to communicate' the Ar.
t ides of. that Treaty, es it was for this.'Country lately
to demand the communication of the Secret Articles
ot"rilsit. The Noble Lord bhd cited•tlie unilateral
article to prove that Russia would have been now
equally at war with Britain if the Expedition to
Copenheeen had. never taken place. The House had a
right to, see the article. front which such an hiterence
was deduced, in order to judge itsellof the •weight
that ought to beattached to it. Thu other Papers he
should move for were copies or extracts of. the mi-
nutes .at: Lord Hutchinsou's conversation so. often
reterred to. Fortner motions foe these minutes had
been negutived. But , other motions had also been
negatived and afterwards brought forward • by the
Right Hon. Secretary, and granted. The words ‘, you,
Lutist make Peace with Francei! were cited as a proof
thkt there Were secret arrangements at Tilsit, • in
which Russia had • bound herself to hostility against
Britain, and that there was no possibility ot getting,
rid of that hostility, :but by-Britain's making peace.
with France. . He wished -to • have the dispatch be-
tine the House, in order that everyone nary have an
opportunity of judging for himself, - whether the
meaning ot the eipresston was not rather that. peace
may be obtained*.honoerabie terms.) fork should
be understood that 'he was as far from being disposed to
accede to any thing dishonourable as the person's who
were least desirona of Peace.' The other citation
ulaue try- the Noble Lord, fittur• le moment.
mentvr reinglet6.re," bed also carried considerable
e.ent with it. The Noble Lord had •not stated
11,1 r this expression . had been 'made use of by a
,Ntith4ev: tie said merelraperson ofhigh authormt; ,
It was fit .that the House should Irate the opporte-
oity- of judghag'ut the' expression, with all the cir-

cumstances calculated to add to or take from the
weight annexed to it. He moved accordingly for an
humble Address to his Majesty, praying that he
would be graciously pleased tla give direittions that
these carious Papers be laid before the House.
Laid GIM:IN'VYILLE LEPESON GOWER hoped
the House would not be surprised, that he was
anxious to take the earliest opportunity to espNis
-the satisfaCtion- he. felt at being enabled by the-Ho-
nourable Gentleman's motion to corre& the inisun-
derstandings and mis-statements which had gone.
abroad with respect to what he had said on a former
night. He was anxious, not on . his lawn account
alone, but for that of the country, to do justice to that,
great man who was no more, and whose loss the coun-
try could not sufficiently deplore. So far was it from
being a point assented to, as a .boon to purchase the
coalition of t ;that the maritirne.rights of England
should be brought into question, that every idea of
such a proceeding was protested against in the meat
decisive manner: The article relative to that point
was given in by Russia,*;*ith a view to:her own feel-
ings and wishes alone. Mr., Pitt certainly did . not
abandon, in his lait' moMents, those fundamental
principles of the maritime, .superiority 9t,
which in every part of hislife he had been.so anxious
to maintain. Be felt it 11:'duty.and pleasure. to.say
thus flinch vindication, of the memory of that
exalted character. The Paper that was more imme-
.diately connoard with these obsenitions,- be was
very desirous to see before the House', and he hoped
his Right Hon. Friend (Mr. Canning) would see ito
objeCtion to its being produced. .41e, 'wished also;
that all the correspondence relative to this article
should equally lie'on the. table, in order' to satisfy
the House and the Public, that the idea of 'all-owing
the principles of the' maritime rights of'thia-Cetiritry
to be brought. in. question; ''Ms never, at one mo=
anent,' in the slightest degree assented to. 'When he
agreed to the produelion of • The article, he would
take occasion to say, ',that this was by' no means a
time to enter into the whole triatter'of the Treaty
of rBO5. ' With respect 'to the contents of his
private 'letter' (Lord fiutchihson'S Minutes) he could
not see what power the drOwn.,"or any Officer of '
the Crown; in his' official charaeter, had over theM ;
nor did he think they could, with any propriety,
be-produedd Or called for. If, from any thing
contained in that letter, or froth anyi'other sonree;
the 'Honourable Gentleman supposed him to be
remiss in transmitting intelligence' that he ought ;
to have transmitted, he may-move a vote of cell:.
sure for his trot having dope so. As to the other
matter mentioned' in *one Of his letters, it surely
could not be expected that, he Would mention the
person from whom he had had it,' or the person
who had used it. The House was to judge for itself
the degree of credit it was to give, without reference to
any dispatch 'in which it may be cOntained. A thou-
sand' things may be communicated to Atnbassadcirs
through
.various channels mate or less remote, dirat
or eircuitousOlterindication of 'which would be a
bar to much useful informatioti, and the occasion bf
great injury to the' persons who had before done
that service. It would be riighiv inejurious to in-.
crease the difficulties a British' Ambassador already
had to encounter, from the frequency and facility of
disclosure in the British Parliament. He should
move, as au amendment, the omission of the word:*
following the motion for the Article of 11th
180 s, and the Correspondence upon,lt:
Mr -1,07117° i? R 41)_ tv hilo 1+4..C.A1y agreed
with the Noble Lord, with respect~ tootle part of his
observations, contended, with regard to the other,
*that the letter.ought unquestionably to be produced.
If the prinetple Upon which it was wished to with-
hold it were once admitted, did the HoCise see how
far it ought to be carried ? The whole Foreign Af.
fairs of the State might be
,conducted in a private
correspondence, and be rendered inaccessible to•Par-
liatnent.The Noble Lord had called upon the House
to vote on a communication which he iluoted, as
liaing been made by him in a private letter to the
Secretary of State,' and now the House was to be
precluded from demanding' the "production
that letter. As a 'Member of PMi'ament, he was
inclined to question the information of the 'Noble
Lord. He could not help feeling somewhat indignant
at the answer that had been made by the Noble Lord
to his arguments, and hoped, that if the House did
agree,to the Noble Lord's Amentlmeot, at least the
mmarlty'would be considerable. With respect to
the Continental trausa&ions of 180, it was impos-
sible that his attuotion should 'not have been again
drawn to theM when on this subject. He would
readily admit that part of the Noble Lord's Amend-
ment which related to' the Article, but on, the rest
he must take the sense of the House.

Sir THOMAS TURTON deprecatki- the personal en-
mity which the Ron. Gentleman had evinced.

Sir. WittTaltEAD spoke to ordee. Although he
objected to the expression used by the Hon, ILronet,
be was not offended by it, entis'Ciell as he was of
having been influenced by no such motive.
Sir THOMAS TVRTONdeclared that he meant
only political enmity, and apologised to the }ion.
Gentleman, towatrds whom he entertained the
highest respea, for the Unguardedness of his ex-
pression. He contended that were the House to
agree' ro tite motlon the private letter could not be
obtained'; although he allowed that if it ought to be
produced the Right Hon. Gentleman might be cen-
sured for withholding it; and lie deprecated most
s►rongly tie disgrace which n►u:;t attach to British
diplomacy, it the confidence of foreign individuals
in. our Ministers Were abused.

Mr. asunn HT supported the Amendment.

,Rlr.. I>GliVDHilltil- declared, that no one thought
more tenderly of private correspondence between the
Government of the Country. and our. Ministers at
Foreign Courts, than hitrilelf. But the letter in
'question bad not been allowed to remain secret, and
therefore'forleited all the privileges of privacy.—
Having been quoted tier au important use by the per-
son by whom it.was written, the House bad an un-
doubted right to call for its produCtion ; a right sub-.
jest only to that general limitation of distretion which'
ought to extend to documents of every description.
Unless that discretion forbade the produStion, all
correspondence between public men on public,af-
fairs ought to be prOduced. Nothing could-, more
effedually chew the abuseof tbe principle or` secrecy
than' the Danish. Expedition, in the- defence of
which transaStion hiS Majesty's Ministers after hav-
ing been driven. from- every other grouts ',:earthed
themselves in secret articlesand priVate infintinatioit.
M;. STURGES BOURNE'deniekl,thattris Noule
Friend had used this letter fur the porpti,e of in.

iluelicing the decision of the Hoese. He had beet
present when his Noble Friend made, the spfech,
which caused so considerable an impresSion and he
well nicoileCted that his Noble:Friend stateiji the ge-
neral hiet of which he was in possession, aiia that it
was nut until' in reply to a question pat'to 'him by
the Hoe. Gentleman opposite, that he added that fie-
had communicated that faCi in a private letter Co the
Right Hon. Secretary of State.-Ifliii6StatneaTrom,.
going -.any farther into this subjea at .present, he
begged to be understood that he was cot deterred
from doing so by the high aini.dis,9aterial tone which
the Hot). Gentleman on this, as well as on every
other occasion, cheseto assume. The House, and,
the Publit,. would judp,of thse consisted-4'er the
Hen. Gentlemen opposite, who, When they' Were in
office, had refused to priiduce, on, the only two occa-
sions UN which they' were required to produce them,
Papers 'tweedier by his'Hon. Friends' but who'now,
after having .exhausted their . motions for public
doeumenas, were driven to the necessity of moving .
for the unwarrantab)e protitaionoof, private cot-
respondence '
„,, , .
LAWRENCE defended his Hon. Friend from
the accusation of having used a high and dietatorial
tone, which arationiWaisifie more extraerdinary,
when the' end diaittollittinie,which the Ho-
.
nejurahle a4aser himse
~assumed was coma- ,
dered. ,fiefachniited yirinatfiwie a stronger ground
mina be:laid rer;the produetion ()la private, than for
the prode4fentorif p public but denied that
there was any unpaisable line of demarcation be-
mem. !them. It the , letter contained any names
which - onglit to be sulilvessiA 'let these'ilaa:ies
suppressed, but let-thelet ter be given:- --
thavpiksrAlipmytt, cgreencled .11)0V-the
Noble Lord ibadinot.,quoted ftom.the private knit-
and that everilf he had' t world still: have remained
in 'the diseretieh tif'hia"liTaleky,'.4'GOvernhient 'whe,
then to produce the letter :or,not.. .06nceiving thief
'lnadequate grounds had:ibeeu hid:ff.sr the Motiee,
he should give it his decided',negative; •
Dr. wit UNCi. explained,
Secreittiy weeld fairly7seate,
that' he. had hitherto ab.stained from 'speaking one. the
subjeasbeeause whatever might havelscen the putirso
of. the'del)llie, had hein poSsibie that the argu-
ments of the HO. GentletpeossliOnldheve influenced
the Home,orthat.the argumenta of Air Noble Friend
shonld not hive infitieeced the' Howe .on what, he
cab
COiWAAVed be, the lesir n before th • n • if
r-the.'inclination.of the -House had slump itselt to be
unfavourable to his view of the SUb4eets he should
.
then have stood Up, not merely to argue against the
motion, but toeptreet the Heusi- that if they slid not
place in him that; Confidence, without which it was
impossible ter him adequately to fulfil the dutiei of
his situation, they wouldpe*Phim to retire; re-
taining his hotioer,; Not one -spark of that honour
should he coneeivehe retained it he were to divulge •
that which, at the time when it was -0011)1111ffie3ted,
and since, and 140 W he felt, was eenununicatedin
confidence. Under that impression, howevergreat
the deference 'which 'he entertained for the House,
and heWever anxious he was to boW to their decision,.
Were that decision to call-for the production of tho
Paper in qeststion, 'he would rather incur their dis-
pleasure then thus compromise his own honour and
character. Having said thus much,, he would pro-
ceed to, remark on sense of the arguments that had
beet) urged by the opposite side of. the House. Au
urneOurahle Gentleman (Mr. Windham). had ima-
gined. a.possible case in which the privates correspen-
deuce between. the SecretarY of State at home and
the Miuister abroad might. be' polled to• such an
extreme, that all official: intercourse might be tar-
ried on in that Menner,. and then historian be left to
search in vain for ,public documents on!'which to
ground ' his relations. The impossibility. was so
evident, since the chasm must so soon be discovered
by thecolleagnes,of the Minister and by the Sovee
reign, who could not fail to be surprised 'at the
departure and arrival of Messengers without dis-
patches, that he was astonished how the Houten-We
Gentleman, who, to. great acuteness of understand-
ing joined that knowledge of business, which certain-
ly must spew him that acuteness of understanding,
though theoretically advantageous, might be practi-
cally injurious to butines4 could advance such a
monstrous supposition. As his Noble Friend had'
justly stated, many cases must occur, 'in which a
Minister at a Foreign Court might, in his public
official dispatches, relate facts and occurrences to his
own Government,and, at the same time, confide to
them, in secret communications, what he conceived
to be the springs and motives of those occurrences.
An Ambassador might be put in possession, through
,eo4olential channels, of such information. He
might receive it on the score of his own personal
charatter, or lie• might be trusted, under the un-
derstood obligation of his office, by a friend, a mis-
tress, or a courtier of the Sovereign In whose ca.;
pital he resided. The whole nature of the infurrua-
lion would then consist in the authority, which ae-
thority was precisely the circuaistance that could not
be divulged. ,Otherwise, when a British Mmister
went to a Foreign Court, he ought loudly, and ge.
nerally to declare tO all about him " do not tell nse
any thing which you donut wish .should be laid :be-
Thre the British House of CoMmons." linfartunace.
ly too much already had been divulged, and le) far
from depriving the'luture historian of his materials,
we anticipated him. It would be easy to point out
books that had been translated into otherlanguages,
which had caused the disgrace and death of indi-
viduals iMpheated by Otero. But .then, said the
Hon. Gentleman, it' this letter was unfit for pro-
AuCtion it. ought not to have been quoted by the
Noble Lord. The answer to this was, that it -bad
not been voted by him. His Noble Friend stated
a fad ; he was asked by the Hon. Gentleman whe-
ther he had stated that, fad before ; he was answered
yes, but in a private letter; and this the Hon.
Gentleman chose to call, a quotation ! Of Course, the
Hon. Gentleman asked his Noble Friend to reply to
his question as a courtesy ; for surely be would not
pretend to arrogate• to himself the right of demand-
ing from every Member in that House an answer to
Any questioa he might think proper to propose
him. if the Hon. Gentleman: did so arrogate, he
would sas, that to him exelusiOy he would deny
that courtesy; The Hun. and Loused Gentlernani
(Pr. Lawrence) bad taken very angry notice Of the
"mannerin which this diet:nen:a roue of the Hon.:
*lGititlemen.hed peen repreeended. For himself,
could not Sill' feat the 101 W et -thelfertarGentiesnaa.
had. wed- 'higher fikthight tha` be usually
chose to pitch it .and. he hoped that it Would not.

make greater impresSion ontlieHouse than it esnal--;
ly had made. With respeft to the arguments ot that.,
Hen. and Learned Gentleman ton the question bee-
fore'. the i!euse, be had himself anticipated the
answer to them, by admitting that, prima
strong ground must be laid fer the production of a
Ovate Letter,' and that if any names Which it
ceetainee oughtin discretion tce.heesuppressed, they
should be suppressed. How did this apply to the
present case, in which the_ name Wail identically the
matter of coeseqoence ? If the learned dentleinan
discredited the statements ot his .Noble ;Heed; let
I)lm.say so. Such a proceeding, though not very
civil; would at leaet be intelligible ; but it was most
extraordinary, by way of putting his Noble Friend';-
erutheo the test, to mine for the production of a
letter, the only part of which by whfch his 'veracity.
could be asceitained; must be. suppressedl After
some further Yew forcible reasoning on this divisiote
of the subject, .the:Right Hoe. Secretary proceeded:
to state on what grounds be supeorted theo7lierpart
of the amendment proposed by his Friend. Siete the'
• speech of his Noble Friend on a funnernighe'an et-
tempt had been' revived to-prejudice in the' minds of
the public that Administretion in the )ear
which had endeavoured to establish a Conine-4gal•
coalition against France. He 'would not now enter,
fully on this subject, not conceiving; that it \v"s'
comprised in the Hon. Gentleman's eotice, alihneete
he should always be prepatjed to Meet tinyattack la
the merits of the great individual, now no mace, \v1:0.
had so principal a share in that transaction. It net
berth thought by the Holt. Gentleman opposite, tier:
in the speech of Noble Friend they had foteue
something derogating front the policy of that o:nee-
deeacy, on tilep)U:ld that the Admitii'st ratio;, tfftti
day were content to sacrifice to its riecemplishinetit.
a question, in which: the couutry had ever telt
deeply interested, and: in 'which it intim- new lea
more deeply interested than ever-the maritime.
right's of England. The reverse of this was the fact.
If the Hon'Cetitlereale had attended accurately ti''
.lie must have been convinced,
:hat the 611114 the decla ration W 144 of itself a pleete
that it was not. a matter of concession. _ Hail it eecil
so, it wouldilieie Mede part of the price of that coo--
"'Oche it Would, have terade part of
\Ybat was it that it that time, under the keelletto"
of " the Law of Nations,"-attracted the atientem of
FuroPe 4- ' So far was this tern''; fioinapp)Yh% -I?9tr
maritime right, thafit &leer happened6ot in any
public: document the. matititiw coat; WO, 03‘%,11r '.O
mentioned. What were the cases to which. Ito
preseion referred ? tc..ceitt of theDiiii.e.
ptrighien on riCutral territory, and, dttiggie
toelaughtere-the receni seizure of a Briesii
seer (Sir T. rsambold), on:. neutral territory, and car-
rying hineprisoner to France. Did the Hon: Gen-
tlemareeee nothing in this seizure ot a British
seer, and this murder of. a French Prince, but that
Which must attraa the attentionof the Continent t.e
the Maritime,COde of Great Britain ?.. On that ,Alere•
tithe Code, a separate provi‘iun had been prriposet),'
in an article to. ivhith"his .Noble Friend `on the part
of Great Britain bad relesedeo be a party•
first of the papers which would be prodtKV,l,in con-.
sequence of the motion before the House, beiug a
dispatch dated the etii.of April, it Would be tuella'
that his Noble Friend had declared, that no coteie
&ration whatever, not 'even the certainty -of a teeth
srupuire,wit4s the Confederating Powets, WO6l Ile,:
duce him to consent to the propositt.at wade t'c'
Russian Minister, to submit the Maritime COt
th,
Great Britain. to a Congress of the great Powers 04
-Europe, andehat be was fully authorised to declare,
that the British Government would never conseet,
to such a referenCe or iuter`erence. Was this
language—were these the symptoms of concession
Unquestionably, after the re eeaieu of the ertiche
reposed—after the signature el the Treaty, 11t3
Nehie Friend had received and transtnitted how.
the Declaration alluded to; but he had it not in Iles
discretion to refuse-to do this.; and be ..accoteP3"i
ttE
the reception of the Declaration, with a sfeeng f":e
pression of his regret, chat his Imperial Mej,:%4 "
thought it necessary to make it, and with n ;(;:.
,petition of what he knew to be the sentience:'
Court on the subject. Did' ills Neble tbl''
the favour of his Sovereign by ibis coieloa ? ‘.lrc
Isis Majesty's Miniiters lake-warm on
sr whew.
On the tont rary, as would appear by Ibe Pl'""
rd Iv.i;
produced, on the reception of the Treaty Le
bis
grave wrote to his Noble Flitted, expresiTg .
I. clarity
eesty's approbation of his Preceedities, er"l
his Majesty's determination not to submit
of Maritime War to enyenichatien whatever.,
was during Pitt's•adininisi ration. Nort,e.titteri,"7
determination concealed from the Foreign ;V4'lll' Lot ,
for the copy of a letter i same clat.,ffr,9
to,
'
Artilgrave to the l.tussitte
.Ambassador seihile,()`:,sPeue
the occasio),?
(lured, in which his Lordship exprc•sseti situ"'
timents, declared that no StatestoJti tvotact
fetind in thiS Country
.who i,101.1,1(1 t ',slo,
.settle that--on Which the power arid
.pll.° georiA
of the Country rested, and started that.
Friend had discharged a decidtel duty in I"'
Where was here the sacrifice
lion of the proposition thie had been made t
ndbilltit:
rights ? Whatever the Het'. Geffilen"il f!,:clglit
fer, they:
of other parts of his Niinle Friend's, drier,
e that
must know his candour too well to
er,stil'PuliPle‘ndoi tine .
observations. on a former cvening iinee but iv
the purpose of producing, not "" "c. ' • .4
that he Was determined not in eoi
'e'er of ter
which was the solid-toundation of Me pole,
he House and the
Panegyric on the coedutt, by wlecilpr-loienlie:elt,itea6,
country. fie congratulated t
tie 00Y 91""
vided this Negociatione would perste
l_et that,
suchttat asittmetie.larrtupttg:cioppielstadtobt:heonseetthccict
pr;10:..
trusted
Negociatioi) in any other hands. kie s_l7f-that,
the great example objetle-
day had set, by retusitig purchase
hae sacritieo
however desirable and important, t. , Bie
of that which was not the peconar strengte
se et
lain alone, but which was the source al:ld AIPP r_irn
which the Admihistrationn
that Objed tippet ee
the general strength by ,r)le wouP •
to be attainable; lie trusted that that c)itat.'l3,o4 that
be followed- to the- end of time. he *.r
what we had not given tO
should never give tO avert even a .grent if
to the re"
trusted that what we -had refused to gra lout
quest of friendship would never be extorted
irony aeqeire a ere:: !vv.`. to
by the rnumn ot hoefiltlY•-
• Dr: Letwasece explained. • e tot e
Mi.' WEI I.D. te,Plie4* at7afiri.;„116"...,,
personal imputations that had been
ii opt
" course of die &We, observed that