The Sun.
London, England, 1863-12-11 00:00:00

SHARE MARKETS.---This day.

ORDINARY SHARES AND STOcKS.

Share; Railways.

Paid. Price. done.
Closing Business

t 3.14)

Bir,, Wol., and Str. Val.
Blythe and Tyne.
Bost.,Sleat.,and
Bristol and Exeter
Caledonian
Cork. and Bandon
Cornwall •
Do A A ,rets no div
Do. Bj btietel
ne ppe.api
paid
nt.oh aßs.
Dubin & Belfast June.
Dun., Per th, & Ab. June.
Edinburgh & Glasgow.
Glaeg. and S. Western.
Great Eastern, Ord. stk
Ditto A stock
Ditto East Anglian et
GreatNorthof Scotland
Great Northern
Do A stock
Do B do
Gt. S. an I W. of Irelan,l
Great Western ...
Do Str Val gua. stock
Lancashi:e & Yorkshire,
London and Blackwal
Lon., Bright.,& S. Coast
Lon., Chat., and Dover
Lon. & North Western
Lon. & Sw.th Western
Man., Shef., & Lincoln.)
Maryport and Carlisle.,
Dot shares...
Metropolitan
Midland
Do New

s si

8 8i
81 63
1171 118&

6.4.0

Do Birthing. (t Derby
Gt. W. of Ireland
Do. 4 shares
Mid Keit

Do Cray Line
North British
Edin., Perth, & Dundee
Nth. Eastern—Berwick
Do, U.N.E. purchase

Lt. 16.4

Do.Lecds
Do York
Do Carlisle
North London
Do New
North Staffordshire
IN. and S. W. Junction
Scottish Central
Scot N. E., Aber. stock
Do scot. Mid. stock
Shrews. and Welchpool
'Shropshire Union
I .
;South
Devon
South Eastern
South Wales
S. York. and River Dun
Staines,Wok.,andWok.
Stockton & Darlington

6}• 7

38 10
16 17
94 96
107 WO
49 50
45 47
71 86

124 126
13u 13(
t 36
90 98
03f 64

1081 ¶O9l
71 73
107 iO9
i 3 44
104 11
101 102
47} 4S?

11 1121
1271 L2St
It?
96 98

151 i 62.1
24 t 6
101 101 i:

58 58&
88 88t

119 121
1 2 p
77 78
11 11i
122 126
42 44
98 100

61 52
31a 94
95i 96

97 :9
gi 'Ot
47f 37f
9 10 c
7t
158 16i
5 A 4
2f 34 pi

12.10

Do _

Do New, 1866
Taff Vale. ..
Do B
Do C
Ulster
Do
Do
Vale of Neath
Victoria sta. and Pint
Waterford & Kilkenny
West Cornwall
W. Hartlepool Har.,t
West Midland --Oxford
Do Newport
Do Hereford'

83 8$
170 175

8211
118

49f I

130 II

Gn i i

109
71h 2
107 k 8
43}
ivfi 5/
101} 1

112 i HI 12
123

BRITISH POSSESSIONS.

' Closing ,
Shan Hallways Paid. Price. Business done
130 Atlantic &St Lawreno all 59 El 404
sk 5 Bom.,Baroda&.Cent Inn 101, 1 6 1(7 106 4 0
Gu. 5 per cent
20 Do. New
20 Do. E. Shares
205 Buffalo and Laxe Huron alt 6 61
10 Do. Preterance all 85 94
Bud alo,Brant,&Godrich
100 p. et. bds. Aug. 1, 1872
100 Do. do. July 1, 187:1 100
100 Do. do. June 1, 1874 100
st Olcutta..,(zS.Eastn. (Lim) 100 103 105
et (3apeTown 4.- Dock Scrij 100 101 103 101
stock Eastn. Bengal gu. sp. e 100 106 109 1081
stock East Indian. gu. sp. c. tOo 1065 1076 107
20 Do. do. G Ext lO 4 15p
20 Do. do. H do.
stock Grand Trunk of Canada Ivo 20 21
100 Do. Ist Pref. Bonds all 72 74 731
100 Do. co. deferred all 68 61
100 Do. 2d Pref. Bonds all 66 69
100 Do. do. deferred all 50 53
100 Do. 3d P, ef. stock
100 Do. do. deferred all 38 42
100 Do. 4th Pref. stock all 26 28
100 Do. do. deferred all 22 r. 4
stock GLlnchaPenin.gua.sp.c 100 1(8 109 1081 1
20 Do. New gun. sp. n l2 16 163,
20 Do. January, 1862
stook Gt. South.of India (Lim
guaranteed 5 per cent. 100 106 106
205 Gt. W. of Canada Share,. all 91 10 94
205 Do. New
100 Do. 6 p.c. '73 with't opt. all 92 95
100 Do. 55 p. o. do. '77-8.. .. all 86 88
10 Indian Branch Limited 2 fp
stock Madras. guar., sp. o. 100 1051 1005 106 51 61
stock Do. 41 p. o. Extension 100 100 101
stock De. d 0........ 100 16 100
20 Do. Fifth Extension. 2
%twit 31elb.Corp. 6p. c. Bnds. 100
50 Melb. & Hobson's Bay. all 57 59
100 Do. 7p. c. Mortg. Bds. all
10 Newßrunswick Cands.
Class A and B. all 3 5
N.lll.C'da.s po let pt bds 100 82 84
stock &hide (100 106 107 107
stock Do. Delhi I 100 105 It 6
Su Do. 'x z 2 1 ip
et Do. Punjaub
Do. Do.
Cook Do. lndus.St. Flo ) i inn 101 103 ,
OOLONIAL (10 V EItN3i.ENT SEC U 10.1TIEs.
a. vt..) Ul)
1877-84
; Do. 6p. c. Feb & Aug 100 102 104
- Do. d p.c.3lar & Sept. 100 102 104
; Do. Sp. o. Jan &.July. 100 91 93 925
Do. 5 Inscribed stock 100 9) 93
o.,'ape49.llope, 6p 0,1873 100 106 108
Do.Ap &Oct. 1880 100 109 111
Do. 1891 100 109 111
Do. Jan. & July, 1891.. 100 112 114
'Ceylon, N0v.1878, 6p ( 100 110 112
;Mauritius 6 per cent .. 100 1(16 108
Natal Gov. 6 per cant.. 130 17 109
IN.B.Gov. 6 a..&J al) 100 104 106
Do. dp. c.Ap. & Oct. 100
- N. S. W. G ov. 5 p 1., 15.9 100 100 102
1 Do. sp. c.,16/1 to 1.',;,‘ 100 101 102
Do. d0.,1888 &upwde 100 101 102 :011
'New Zealand 6 p cent. 100 110 112
'Nova Scotia Gov. 6p.
sterling, 1875 lOO 104 106
'Queensland (ley. 6p. c lOO Cl 113
IS. Aus G6p.c.1878.& up lOO 111 113
;Vio.Gov. p.c. Ja.&,July 100 107 109
Do. to 6 ma. A.0.&0et.. 100 1081 1093 1091 9
-
BRITISH. MINES.
2 Cambrian Consol. Gold 1 4 id
tAillord Amalgamated.. 33 34 331 3
Devon G. Cons. gavist.) 1 550 660
East Bassett (Illogan).. 30 57 60
1 East Clogau Gold Ltd. ss. Icl par;
East Caradon ...... 1.14.6 26 27
East Carp. Brea... A.4.0 61 6/
F.. WlHussel (Tavistk:) 8.9.0 45 5
IG- O runea.t&gotUAtlui lcr(Guws.e.n ).
518:44 481 411
G. Wheal Vor(ideleton, 40 114 121
Grenville . ... 6.16. t 41 41
Hem-Ws-Foot 8.12 .38 40
tlingston Downs 4.18.0 14 21
- Lady Bertha
Margaret (lJny Lelarrt 9/ 14 16
—ltarke Valley..
4 ilyndy Iron Oro (Lim ) 2/ 14
New Setun l9l 90 100
• i.Corth Downs z4 11 14
-S.Wh'i Iktset,(lllor,an 3.1.0 26 24
North Wlttal Crotty
J Par Consols (St. Blaze);
20 Providence (Uny Lelnt.) 10.6.7 42 94
SouthCaradon(St.Cleer) 16 405 fl 5
S. Cam Brea (Illogan) —
Frau. (Mogan 118.1 R. 9, 60 65
-
Stray Park '30.17.6 30 32 '
{ ran= Silv.l.; Lead Min.! 41 1 4
fin Croft 9 18 19
'West Basset (Illogan) ll 91 105
W Cr radon (Liskeard) 5 18 20
West Seton
Wheal Basset (Illogan)I 55 870 925
Wheal Bulleratedruthl 5 225 275
Wheal Kitty (G.Lelant) 2.0.6
WhealLuthott
Wheal Mary Ann Pen ) 8 115 12
Wheal Beton 5Bl 160 170
Wheal Treiawney (Lis ) 7 21 22
_ Wheal Union 3.17 21 3

MISCELLANEOUS—Continued.

Joint •stock Discount,
Ditto, new, 31, 4
London Finanlial Association, lim., 231 h
Mercantile Credit Association, lim., 71 6
National Discount Company, lirn., 9i
Oriental inland Steam, lim.,
Peninsula and Oriental Steam, 831 3
Ditto, new, 5O
Rio de Janeiro City Improvements,
Ditto (£4), 4i
Van Diernen's Land, 1011

LAW INTELLIGENCE—(This Day:.

COURT OF DIVORCE.
(Before Sir. P. Wilde and a Special Jury.)
CRUWTIIER V. CROWTHER AND. GRIFFITHS.
The Queen's Advocate, Mr. Huddleston, and Dr. Spinks,
were for the petitioner, Sergeant Parry rand Dr. Fresham
for the respondent, and Mr. Hawkins, Q.C., and Mr. Har-
man for the co-respondent.
The Queen's Advocate stated the case. The petitioner Mr.
William Crowther charged his wife with adultery
with the co-respondent Mr. 'William Heckt'ord Griffiths
who denied the allegation. The respondent, in ad-
dition to denial of her adultery pleaded that her
husband had deserted her wilfully, and left her without
adequate maintenance. Damages were laid at 45,000. Mr.
Crowther was an extensive tenant farmer, renting about
1,000 acres of land when he married the respondent, who
was the daughter of a wealthy retired tradesman, residing
at Healer, near Hounslow, named Sherborn. The mar-
riage was solemnised in May, 1855. Mr. Crowther, at the
time, resided at Somerville Aston, in Gioucesteishire, and
there was considerable desparity between the ages of the
parties, the petitioner being turned 40, and the respondent
only 18. There was one child the issue of the mar-
riage, which was dead. The parties lived on
terms of the most perfect harmony until the intimacy
Mr. Crowther and his wife came to London to see the Ex-
hibition, and took lodgings in Grafton-street, and were ac-
companied by a female friend of Mrs. Griffiths In May,
1862, Mr. Crowther's suspicions wore aroused by the
constant attendance of Mr. Griffiths at his place,
and his coming to London whenever Mrs. Crowther
came. On the 27th of May, 1862, Mr. Crowther
went with his wife to her father's at Hounslow
with the corespondent. In 1859 Mr. Crowther received a
considerable accession to his property, and purchased
Weddington-hall and the estate, near Leamington, in
Warwickshire, where the parties went to reside during
the rebuilding of his house at Somerville, Aston. Mr.
Griffiths was a solicitor, who lived at Chipping-Camden
Gloucestershire, and who was in extensive practice, having
inherited a very large business from his father. Mr
Griffiths was what was called a sporting solicitor, and Mr.
Crowther, who kept his bunters, and whose residence
was distant from Chipping Camden about eight miles,
formed an acquaintance with Mr. Griffiths in the
pursuit of field sports. On the 30th of April, 1862,
an altercation took ~lace between them, and they agreed
to separate. Subsequently she left her home, and it was
not until the November following that it was discovered,
through a female servant of Mrs. Griffiths, that Mrs.
Crowther had been living with Mr. Griffiths,
at his house, up to the 25th of June. The
learned counsel then read letters from Mrs. Crowther
to her husband to show that they were living on the most
affectionate terms. So far from Mrs. Crowther having been
left without sufficient means, Mr. Crowther allowed her
£6OO a year, which she actually received during the time
she was living in the house of her paramour. Since the
marriage Mrs. Crowther's father died, leaving £40,000 to
his widow, which at her decease was to go to her abso-
lutely, in the event of her having no children.
The learned counsel concluded by a very earnest
and eloquent appeal to the jury to mark
theit sense of the conduct of the co-respondent, and to show
by the amount of damages they awarded that parties could
not with impunity invade domestic peace and produce
misery where only harmony and happiness had previously
existed.
After the examination of several witnesses, the jury re-
turned a verdict for the plaintiff. Damages, 41,000.
Decree nisi, with costs.

SECONDARIES' COURT.
(Before Mr. Potter and a Common Jury.)
SINGULAR FALSE IMPRISONMENT CASE.-BOLTON V.

BRYANT.

This was a writ of inquiry to assess the damages in a
false imprisonment case, plaintiff being an attorney out of
practice, and defendant a sculptor.
Mr. Joyce, for the plaintiff, said that his client had been
concerned, for the defendant, in some proceedings in the
Lord Mayor's Court. Defendant accused plaintiff of steal-
ing some money and a ring, and the result was that plain-
tiff was given into custody, and figured at the station
house in the iron enclosure known as the dock. The
acting inspector found that the defendant had been drinking,
and that his account of the affair would not warrant the
detention of the plaintiff, who was accordingly discharged.
For the unreasonable conduct of defendant, plaintiff now
sought damages.
Plaintiff was called and said there was not the slightest
ground for charging him with the robbery. He bad known
defendant for about four years, and believed his income to
be about £4OO per annum.
The learned Secondary having summed up, the jury
awarded plaintiff LlO damages.