The Sun.
London, England, 1830-01-15 00:00:00

DEPARTURES.

Prince Limn, from Ashburnham House, Dover.street, for
Richmond ; Hon. General Phipps, from Mount-street, on a
tour; Mr. and Mrs. Skinner, from the Bath Hotel, Arlington-
street, for their scat in Berkshire ; Captain Campbell, from
ditto, for Brighton; Edward Turner, Esq from the London
Hotel, Albemarle-street, for Bath ; Mr. and Mrs. C. Phillips,
from the Pulteney Hotel, Albemarle.street, for their seat in
Hants; Capt. Tyler, from Pall-mall, for Brighton.

SPORTING INTELLIGENCE.

TATTERSALL'S.

The Mummer party were again in the field yesterday,
and managed to place their favourite in his old station,
without, however, having say prejudicial influence on
Brurewicker, who cannot be quoted at more than 81 to 1.
Mahmoud and Wat Tyler were in somewhat better favour;
but none of the others underwent any alteration. Seve-
ral sporting Lets were made, and a tolerably busy day ter-
minated thus ;

MILEY.
8 to 1 agit Sir Mark Wood's The Mummer
Si to 1 agst Mr. Petre's Brtinswirker
11 to I agst Lord Cavendish's Mouse colt
12 to 1 agst Mr. Chifney's Cretaida colt
13 to 1 agst Sir M. Wood's Cetus
18 to 1 agst Lord Exeter's Mahmoud (taken)
20 to 1 agst Lord Cleveland's Wat Tyler (taken)
23 to 1 agst Lord Sefton's Sal colt
25 to 1 eget Lord Tavistock's Custar•i colt
25 to 1 apt Mr. Ramsbottom's Zuckarelli
25 to 1 agst Lord Sefton's Captain Arthur
25 to 1 agst Lord Egremont's Brother to Grampus
SO to 1 apt Lord Brine
50 to 1 agst Mr. Chifney'a Snarl (taken)
50 to 1 agst Mr. Houldsvrorth's Brother to Lancastrian
550 to 500 on seven agst the field (taken)
1000 to 400 on Mummer agst Wat Tyler (taken).

OAK'S.
6 to 1 agst Lord Scfton's Mooch*
9 to 1 agst Lord Queensberry's Maria
9 to 1 agst Mr. Stonehewer's Leeway filly
13 to 1 agst Lord Jersey's Filagree filly
15 to I agst Mr. Maberley's Zelus
17 to 1 Agfa Lord Exeter's Shumla
BT. LIGE*.
10 to 1 apt Lord Cleveland's Raby
12 to 1 egst Mr. Petre's Brunswicker
15 to 1 apt Mr. Richardson's St. Nicholas
16 to 1 agst Duke of Leeds's Lady Mowbray
20 to 1 agst Duke of Leeds's Redstart
22 to 1 agst Mr. Petre's Reginald
25 to 1 apt Mr. Petre's Laura
25 to 1 agst Colonel Cradock's The Barber
23 to 1 agst Mr. Petre's The Major (taken)

The Duke of WELLINGTON left town about
eleven o'clock yesterday morning, for his MaJzsTv's Pa-
lace at Windsor, where his Grace had a long audience of
the KING, and in the evening returned to town.

The Russian Ambassador had a long con-
ference yesterday with the Earl of Aram:ut/I, at the Fo-
reign Office.

The Bishop of LoNDoN visited the CHAN•
czt.Lor. of the EXCHEQUER yesterday, at the Treasury.

Viscount SIDMOUTII transacted business yes-
terday at the Treasury.

Despatches were brought by a King's Mes-
senger to the Foreign Office on Wednesday, from Sir R.
GORDON, our Ambassador at Constantinople, for the Ear
of ABERDZEN.

Earl BATHURST arrived in town yesterday
afternoon, front the residence of the Earl of Matmrsau
at Henley-upon-Thames. His Lordship proceeded to
the house in Downing-street lately occupied by the Duke
of WELLINGTON. The Noble Earl, after his arrival,
transacted business at the Foreign-office.
The Prussian Minister transacted business
yesterday at the office of the Secretary of State for Foreign
Affairs.

Mr. HusKissoN arrived in town on Wednes-
day night from a visit to the Earl of EGREMONT, at Pet-
worth, in Sussex. The Right Honourable Gentleman
will, it is expected, remove in a short time from Rich-
mond-terrace to a house erected fur him on the site of the
King's Palace in Pull-mall.

LAW INTELLIGENCE.-(TIIIS DAY.)

COURT OF CHANCERY.
JUDGMENT.-MARSHALL V. SARRIT.I.L.

The question in this case arose out of a sequestration.
Mr. Allan Sarrell was directed by this Court to pay
cettain sums of money ; they were not paid, and execution
of that order issued. Not having been able to pay the
money, he went to Guernsey, and was outlawed. A
sequestration subsequently issued, and sequestrators were
appointed. John Saudi, son of Mr. Allan Serrell, was
in possession of some landed property in the county of
Devon, which belonged to his father, and which he cLimed
to be entitled to hold under a lease from his father, (Intel]
in the year 1816, as well as under a deed of purchase exe-
cuted in Mk, which was previous to the execution of the
sequestration. Notice was served on him that an appli-
cation would he made to this Court for an order, requiring
him to attorn to the sequestration as tenant in possession,
or that he should go in before the Master and establish
any claim he had, when he might be examined
pro inter ease suo. He paid no attention to tide
notice, and an order was made directing him to attern.
He at first refused, but subsequently attorney in cheer
terms :—" I attorn to the sequestrators for such time,
at such rent, and upon such terms and conditions, as shall
be subsequently agreed upon." Nothing further took
place for a very considerable period. Rent was demanded
of him by the sequestrators, which he refused to pay. An
action was brought by them against him for the use and
occupation of the property, and was tried at the Devon-
shire Assizes. The sequestrators, in support of their case,
produced the attornment. An objection was made to this,
on the ground that it was of the nature of an agreement,
and required to be on a stamp. The Learned Judge enter-
tained the objection, but reserved the discussion of the
question before the Court of King's Bench. The lease,
on the part of the defendant, was also set up as a bind-
ing lease, and as an instrument under which he had
a right to hold the property until some agreement
had been entered into, or some step taken to an-
nul it. The Learned Judge seemed to incline to en-
tertain this as a point also ; both questions, how-
ever, were reserved to he argued at Westminster, which
was done, and the Court supported both. The conse-
iinence was, that the sequestrators were directed to be
nonsuited. An application was made to the Vice-Chan-
cellor for leave to bring another action on the part of the
sequestrators, and that the defendant might be restrained
from settieg up as a defence the lease and the deed of pur-
chase, and that he might be. called upon to repay the costs
he had compelled the sequestrators to pay to him. The
defendant (in his Lordship's judgment) ought, in the first
instance, to have come into this Court, and established
his claim, if he had one; but not having done that, it
would not permit him to avail himself at law of those in-
struments which, be contended, were valid deeds,
but which he did not choose to have examined
here, and consequently the Vice• Chancellor had
done right in granting leave to bring another action
and an injunction to the affect prayed; but as the segue,
trators had chosen to go to trial without having been pre-
pared with further evidence, they ought to pay costs as
well as other suitors, therefore the defendant could not
be directed to repay their costs. The Vice-Chancellor's
order was accordingly confirmed.
IN RE-WHITE AND METCALF, BANKRUPTS.

The Soucrroa•GENEßA L prayed upon a petition that
an injunction might be issued to restrain the Commis-
sioners from proceeding to examine Mr. Frond again,
until Monday next, or until the trial of the cause in this
matter, which stands for trial to-morrow morning, sht,l
have been tried. Mr. Froud had been summoned to ap•
pear before the Commissioners at two o'clock to day, and
there was every probability, that if he continued to refuse
to produce the deed that he had already been twice
committed fir declining to produce, he would be
forthwith committed. Such a step would greatly in-
convenience him in his preparation for the trial of the
action to-morrow, he being solicitor for the bankrupts.
Hence the, present application.
The LORD CnAlzcELLon could not assume that tl•e
Commissioners or any judicial body would do wrong, so
that he could not make the order prayed.

The SOLICITOK-GE,ERAL argued hia point over and
over again, but the Lout Chancellor continued to refuse to
interfere, leaving the whole to the discretion of the Com-
missioners.