The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser.
London, England, 1819-11-11 00:00:00

4. 4 - t • _e • ' • '4 1,• -
1 7 MR gbairiieVplTll Bleillan PR
--...1---
s 0
9tia-4t is 0,4 -,...- taft„tto.d4, that
Counts have bees at rem the Heels aid`
Griper, row am a voyuglglelne to the North Pole ;' "
that they, had proceeM , . 98 h degree of lati-'• '.l
__
lode ; and that it is thVgfiftife'oPlie Irri 3, btara i 40111)44114
tetic
%hese ships that there NW* lustrige eat tif ' MIN Y• I Sugawit
As a (rimed of Lieateraat Parry's, I Mall f afuch,,
°bilged by your informing me upon what aUtlintity th ac
-
ammo vests as I have reason to believe no sorb account
bee realty been received; awed that the directive which the.' •
d' vessels larva take*, wool/ rendes, it quill oboe- is
canary hr them In go so far Northward as flue Netlitlexite ,lobsager
of latitude dm BolfaV Sup. It is &Man willited in your ac.
,1,..,
crisai. 46 that the motives with.wbwas Na discovery Alps
have fatless ia, did not karaw of that last year's espednioa." /.
It is sot likely that any Natives, th as e present ships s, fen 4
in with,siliald have Weird of the meethig which Captaime• ,
Rosa hul with the aevelipdlocrivered E.qiiialaux, tutiriu
the probability is, that the Ueda sod Griper have not been
near the spot where these allies. were discovered by Very
many leagues. .
I request you will give isarolian to this letter, for the pur-
pose of aacertainiag fur the friends of the Wien* voyager',
whether the report you have gives is authentic.
It *profs that Lieratessasit Parry, with a priedeare which
dues him credit, has mot teemed the inforrnaliuo be may
have obtained, or the plans be is pursuing, to any of the
whalers who brought NO many reports last year, but that lie
has purposely avoided Them.-1 am, Sir,
Your cuustaut Reader,
November 10, 1819. GRENUYIOENSIB.

CIRCULAR OF OA 11,47710 N • I
TO THE LONDON REFORM UNION sOCIETT.

GENTLRBILII.-1 am desired by the Committee of Manage-
ment iu the Metropolis in furtherance of Parliansestary
Reform to apprise you, that I bare, *Wit norfriends, per-
formed the duty intersited to as by the people ear/Fabled un
Monday, the lit of November, in Fietabory Market-place,
namely, is p tine to Lord Sidmouth the Appeal barite
Prince !tricot, then passed; and locum weand apse his
Lordship according to appointment, that I hare received
his answer, which the Committee tbink advisable to be laid
' before the public on the 44th inst. in Smithfield, where it is
proposed to meet In consult upon the manifold grievances of
the country, instead of Finsliwy Market-place, as intruded
to lave bee. held on the 15th instant.

I am, Gentlemen, your obedient Servant,
London Commitirr Room, JAMES WATSON,
November 9, 1319.

UNEXPECTED Acm CCHI.VE

On ilenrisy • respectable female, who had kiitkerier kept
her pregnancy a perfect secret from her friends, was travel-
ling with another female i■ newels front her residence at
elo lecke to town, when on passing at the top of Grosvenor-
street she was suddenly take• very ill ; her compasios much
alarmed immediately stopped the roach, and regoested the
driver to go into St. George's Oospital, and ask permission

fur the Way to be taken in, wbich beiug readily complied
will', she was accordingly takes i q and put to bed, wheu is
about •gotairter of an bout aloe was safely delivered of a very
Sue buy, having been only serve. nautnatagose.

BOXING.
SHELTON An) OLIVER.

-----
Th.:fancy hiving felt so snitch divappointment, in cos.
sequence of the battle being w ol7"between Sutton and
Larkin, that another" hig fight" hap limit iliirrinined upon,
and last night, at Riindall's, some amateurs offered to back
Oliver spinal Shelton fur 100 giiinrov a.iile. The latter be-
ing present, and always ready fora cuslauser, without the
slightest limitation, accepted the challenge A deposit was
wade accordingly, and artistes were draw* up to thefutiuw.
mg effect:—To be a fair stand-up light, in a 24 fret ring;
the money to he placed in the hands of gr. Jaelmon, end
the battle to lake piece within 20 miles of London, on the
27th of December.

The battle between Ben Coxbradl, the Hampshire wrestler,
suit 51 ar tin • 1V , the pa v ~,, r, frows.Hutiliesphiushire,
made at Wey-hill Fair for thirty guiiscas aside, will take
pierce this day in Buckinghamshire,

WOND E R FUL EGGS.

[room rue " Quango oAstrra," or irrrniass 23.]

Extract of a letter f.om River chalk, dated September 18,

1810.

(TR•INLATTON.)

In the afternoon of the 11211, of August last,. young girl,
It years old, named %larie Denjou, being employed iu feed-
ing the poultry belonging to Henry Boucher, of the parish
of River Melte, with whom she lives, onticeol the cork
treatiog one of the hens, soil gave him a kick, having at the
time in brr hand • small stick to keep him off. Al this
moment another of the liens (which slue calls Hupp', for
each of iliens has a name), seeming to take part with the
cock, Rear furiously on the ble of the young girl. She
mu ntioned the circumstance to the people of the house • few
minute* after. It must he obei.rveit, that SNP wore that day
• comb in her hair, :mil had on a blue and white calico gown
with rather • yellow tinge, and torn at the skirt.
The next day about ths-re (o'clock in the afternoon, the
brother attic young girl, .la•tinl Danjon, aged ten years,
having gone to examine the hens nests and toting in the eggs,
found the lieu called nuppe on the nest. As soon as she
had left ii, he look the egg which aloe had laid, on which he
observed, with much surprise, a figure of his siAcr and the
clock. She is drawn iu the attitude and dress of the moment ;
her comb in her hair, her yellowish blue gown torn in the
skirt, the slick in her hand, her foot raised ender the tail of
the cork, seed her head teemed towards the hen, who bad
flown at her from behind. _ . _

This day, the Ml' September, about Iwo o'clock in the
afternoon, the young girl found in l'Ae iisisse neat another
egig, on which there are figlited two smell take
the smallest to be a IDOISIK or a rat, and the other a rat.
Henry Buticlwr takes the ioninllest to be the Afore of his
small dog, the other the cot k.
Thr proprietor of thus, extraordinary elms is going to
Quebec, where lie intends i.linwing them to the curious.
?WWI MON EGGS.

There may be •ern at the Union Hotel, between the hours
of tees and font. on Friday, Iwo egza, upon one of which the
•ppraranee of a young curl, dressed in a yellowish blue
guwo, with a comb upon hcr head, a cane in her hand, and
lo the attitude of 'blowing her leg forward to strike a cock,
having, at the same time, her head turned to defend herself
from the attack of a hen, cosy he distinctly traced; upon
the oilier, there is the r. pies( 'dation of Iwo small 1111i1114111,
resembling a rat and motwe struggliog wttli a cat.

In pursuance Of a Requisition most ►espectably
and very numerously sigssed; the High Sheriff has
appointed a meeting of the freeholders mid house-
holders of the motility of Hereford, on Friday
next, in order in consider the late unfortunate
I*. proceedings nt Manchester. The reason orsigliell
;far the Requisition i., that " the Lord Lieutenant
.2isod marry of the Magistrates of the c
jitended the Quarter.S..asioris, •Itad mei
the state of the Country, and had not
•stotice of the recent events at Maocheµe►..
The Lad, Lane, ream London for Bombay,
.totally lost 14th May. errs Ai 61.
W.lO. Of the _Wand of alerrthl.
7- afflaed at ilowbsi4let

e. nA
:► I I 15:;4044L lib
. •

ilier.k,-11 had been tried twice before Chief Justice..
Abloset. at Guildhall. each time with a different.
molt. The adios was brought by the Plaintiffs.'
to recover boas the Defendants the value of erll
parcel of technical. erroneously delivered by
1111ter keen their warehouse at Exeter. It appeared ,d
Met Si* person, assuming the name of Eytworthy, 1
lad dideive the Plaintiffs to scud a qamititv of
addressed to him by iliac name, at Exe.
l'he itackage was wrist, end • letter with a
address. euclusing the invoice, having been
.oisittimad,by the supposed Mr. Eyeworthy from the
piesellor at Exeter, he thereby mcertaiwed that
.the periwig* had been forwarded agreeably to his
*tiers, and knit a boy to the wurelsowie of the De..
•findatits to ioquire.for it and (say the carriage. A
porcel was delivered to the hey. eddieesed to Mr.ll
Ayeworibl, Exeter. with which be shortly return-1
ed, saying it. was tint the parcel he wanted ; and
another parcel then iu the warehouse, with the same
direction, and containing the cochineal, was deli-
vered to him. It was afterwards chummed that it
fraud had been committed, and that of two per-
sons of the mime of Eyevourilly, living at Exeter,
neither had ordered nor received the parcel in core-
tion. A verdict was given oil the second trial fur
the Plaintiff, and Mr.-SeaRLETT this day moved
for a rule to she* cause why • new trial should
not he greeted, on the ground that Deck a degree
of neglect had not been peeved as to render the
Defendants liable. The Learned Gentleman' argu-
ed at length upon the analogy of the inference of
the connexion in this case of the party inquiring
with the thing inquired for, with dirt of a person
inquiring fur a parcel with a certain direction,
which Afterwards ',roved to contain forged notes ;
in which case the inquiry for the parcel would be
deemed sufficient evidence of his counexion there.
with, to he udmitted against him upoo trial, for a
charge of tottering forged notes.
The COURT were unanimously of opinion, that
the delivery of a parcel to a stranger, not known
to be of the same name as that in the address, with-
out requiring some *locomen% such as a letter at
advice to *hew Ins claim to the parcel, cos a ne-
glect sufficient to render the carrier responsible for
an erroneous delivery—the more particularly so in
this case, where a circumstance had occurred so
likely to awaken suspiciou. as the return of one
parcel to be exchanged for another. with ■ similar
address, and brought by the same couveyauce.—
Kale refused.
RHODES V. LRACIL
Mr. MARRTATT moved for a rule to chew cause
why a new trial should not be granted in this case,
na the ground of the damages, SOO/. being ex-
cresive.

'flie Plaintiff, who had served as a Midshipman
in the Navy, was gunner's mote of an East
ludia-
man, of which the D4eiolatit was Commander.
04i her arrival in the Downs, in her homeward
voyage, the Plaintiff was mitered by the chief mate,
aloha ten o'clock in the furenocco, to get the shot
drawn out of the gulls, and certain men were
assigned to assist him. About four o'clock in the
afternoon, the work brig complete, except four
guns that remained 'indrawn, the mate remonstrat-
ed with the Plaintiff. who replied, " lie had been
kept so long upon pea•gravy, that he was not able
to do it." The male repnrted this to the Com-
matillsr, who, irritated at his mentioning the pea-
grory, end allndnig to the short allowance of pro-
visions, to which it appeared they had been along
time reduced, struck the Plaintiff a violent blow in
the face with his list, and ordered the hands to be
turned up to fi,g him. To avoid the punishment,
the Plaintiff jumped overboard, and the Defendant
would not permit a boat to be lowered for him, but
upon seeing a pilot boat pick hilts up, said he was
sorry the pilot bout was there, for a swim would do
hum good. Upon his arrival alongside, bring too
weak to walk up, the Defendant ordered him to be
hauled lop by a rope, and immediately caused him
to he punished with mot dozen and it half of lselies.
For this an action of assault was brought, and the
Learned Couneel contended that the case was of
too trifling a description to warrant such large da-
mages.
. . . . _

The COURT, however, having heard the Chief
Justice's !flimsies of the evidence for the Defend-
ant, were .1 opinion that the punishment was not
justifiable, inasmuch as it was not inflicted for the
offence by which it WHII now sought to justify it;
but that it was the result of excessitie passion on
the part of the Defendant, excited by smother
cause ; and upon a view of the whole case, and of
the whole of the Defendant's conduct, they dui not
think soy other verdict could have been given.
Rule refused.

THE RECENT TRANSACTIONS AT MANCHESTER.
At four o'clock the CHIEF JUSTICE awl Mr.
JUstirt HOLROYD quitted she Court—leaving
Mr. Justice BAYLEY and Mr. Justice Bur to
dispose of inotious of course.
Mr. Hunt, who had recently entered the Court,
took the first opportunity to address their Lord.
ships. He hoped, he said, that their Lordship.
would allow hint to make a short motion.
Mr. Justice IBAYLEy--"•We cannot hear you
now. You should have made your Application
wisest the Court %us full."

PI

Mr. fluid said, he hail been given to wider*
stand that he could not address the Court, uutd
the bar was gone through. Therefore it was tl►at
he now can* forward. lie had waited both yea-
trrtlay and this+ day in the Hall, for the parpave of
for submitting

-........

I-

r'oiEritts,, in,
n story,
AR O,
talk ...al tidal *Jury ; and
no Act of Parliament had poised to prohibit this
',metier, he humbly conceived that he was entitled to'
the mine privilege. But nu the Court had refused
to hear this offidavit, he had, although it was con-
trary to a determination long since formed by hitil
not to apply to a hired Advocate, lest night
wailed upon the Attorney-General. determineet
to lay the whole case before him, without the least
rerrn tine. aid attended at the chamber* of the
Attorney-General for that purpose. Having sent in
his nano, and business, he received a polite message
frnfat the Attorney-General, requesting hint to send
~ist writing the purport of his buSitarss ; which re-sweat lie immediately complied with; arid. after
,basting waited for Milian hour, he received a writ-
ten assaner trout the Attorney-General, declining
to bring the molter before this Honourable Court.
The application and answer are as follow :
N Mr. Hunt presents his compliments to Ibe Altonsey.
General, and has waited upon kin in ecosseq f the
Court of King's Beech having stated yesterday, •puia an
application which ke mode to that Court fora criminal its-
Girinatiusi agraiost certain Magistrates of Maraelwater, that
such audios oast be made through the Atlanta, or Botioitur.
General. Mr. Mout be. sow waited upon the Attorney-
General with Ave athillavits to support the iiiipliestiou so oho
Court to-morrow, as Mr. Hoot Is led to believe that to be
the last day of ibis Tafel* Slaking motions of nets a
•
Datum" .5 ••!'

die

The answer was in Shoat terma
" The Attoraey-Goneral ben have to Worm Mr. Pont,
that he must bare misapprehended the Judges of the Court
of Lag's Bench, when he supposes them to have stated that
• twins for a criminal information must be made by the
Alturory or Solicitor-Cieneral, since Mr. Hoot will And
"woo inquiry, that it say be grade try any Gentians. of the
Bar. The Attorney-General begs leave further to inform
Mr. Bout. that he does Ma attend the Court of king's
kieuch except when his official duties require it, and that
fin eregarveirsts are such MI to render it impossible fur his
AlReraherthoulpplieutioa srhieb Mr. Haat requires."
In consequence of this answer, he now humbly
prayed. that, us the Attorney-General lied refused
to interfere, their Lordships would either suffer
him to make the motion for a criminal information
himself, or direct the Law Officers of the Crown to
perform that duty. Mr. Hunt was proceeding to
reed the affidavit, but was iiiterrupted by
The COURT—by whom he was directed to read
only that part of it which stated the immediate
nature of his application, without any reference to
what had taken place between bins and the Attor•
net-General.
Mr. Flout then reed the foltewing extract
I, This Depouent to•refore humbly requests that this Ho-
aourahle Court will permit this Deponent to make the apple.
cation, and read the atisdorito himself, or that this Hamper.
Moe Court will direct the Law Ulcers of the Crow. forth.
with to perform that duty, for which airy ore so amply paid
by the public."
The COURT inquired whether Mr. Hunt had sp.
plied to any Barrister to make the motion for a cri.
mind information ?
After this (location had been repeatedly put, Mr.
limit admitted that he had not applied teeny per-
son except the Attorney-General.
The COURT then decided. that they could not
interfere. Before an individual was entitled to
make an application of this kind, he was bound to
thew that he had nude every effort to have the
transaction brought under the cognizance of the
Court in the regular manner, namely, through the
medium of a barrister, and that lie had failed.—
With respect to that pert of the application which
called on them to direct the Attorney anelSolicitor-
General to proceed against certain persons. it could
not be listened to. Those officers were competent
to judge of the cased which required their interpo-
sition. if the Court called on them to proceed,
they would be erecting themselves into prosecutors,
instead of acting as judges. In such a case airy
must proceed on au ex-purie statement—and, hav-
ing once countenanced it, they would be very unfit
to decide on the case when it was ultimately brought
before them.

Mr. Hunt then retired, complaining of the im.
pediments that were interposed in the pursuit of
justice.

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS,
WIMIIIIIDAY, NOVENIIIM 10.

DPFIGAN N. RYLAND ♦ND CO.

Mr. Serjrant HULLOCK moved the Court to set
aside the verdict had in this causein favour of the
Defendants. The action was brought to obtains
compensation in damages for certain losses sus-
tained by the Plaintiffs, on foot of certain commer-
eial transactions which they had with the house
of • Messrs. Ogleby and Budd, of Marseilles, who
were introduced to the notice and credit of the
Plaintiffs by the 'Defendants, and on the faith of
which introduction the Plaintiffs were induced to
give extensive credit to the house of Messrs.
Oglehy and Bodd. The Learned Serjesat said,
that the Plaintiffs resided in Dinexic—the Defen-
dants were merchants is London. The house of
Ogleby and Budd was altogether unknown ; itr
very existence was Dot heard of by the Plaintiffs
until the recommendation of the Defendants. That

swritinnietidation was founded on the letters of tl►e
Defendants, dated the gth and 12th of July ; the
ar►t letter stated that Oglehy and Budd, it house
of respectability, were anxious to open business
with the Defendants; another letter, which was sent
through M►. White, of London, and which, the
Learned Serjestit said, established the responsi-
tight, of the Defendants, stated, that the De-
fendants had long known the house of Oglrby
and Budd; that during the last spring they
deal of business with them.

&J‘t,aii

■

grkli

r~rr~~;

at the time that thu,Dernillants omit them' Awe.:
notations to the P 14601417, the Defendant,' knew
that dime repriventatUtati wet. false.
Mr. 'notice Dat.i.A..-Tha-queation,ts not, elmer
representations wane true or fah*, but
, they were false within the kooniedgeof't6i
party, and were It with the ittteoloto 10 de-
ceive.
Mr. Serjeasit HuLtdca —I f the evidence went
to sheet that the character given of the hawse of
Ogleby and Budil was fake, and was s,. to the
knowledge of the party that gave it. 11.11 wet
Mnf-
ficient—tbst principle Was laid do en it, all the
cases—it was not necessary to drew that the natty
trade the fable representation for may oilvontmc to
himself. it was not netressary to cannel lam of mo-
ral turpitnde, hot if it amid he 111.0/eel ihat lie
wive a false representation, knowing it to Ire
then he stands accuuntahle. He coula ....airy
chew, not from Inference (Sr ClllljeClUril, h,.r r hr
correepoudetice of the Defendants theitis.elvre, that
at the time that they recommended o,Tlehy sitid
Redd to the Plaintiffs as a ionise el opulence
and credit, they knew it was house ill difficulties.
By their own letters, it appeared that they were at
the time pressing Oglehy and Budd fur money,
and complaining that they had not made their re-
Mithinces ; surf from the correspondence betwrie
the Defendants and Ogleby and Dodd, it was
evident that the letter made many observe-
which were palpably untrue, in (whir to ex-
cuse themselves for not paying the Defendants. Is
was expreisly kid down by Justice Buller, that a
knowledge of the party of the falsehood of the ie.
coMmemlation constituted a fraud, mica thottgli It
could not be *hewn that he had ally Interest io
Making that false recommendation. Such was the
law; mud nothing could he more deer then this,
that if it were not fur the ititroduction of the De•
fehtlebts—of their suppression of the real situation
of the house—the Plaintiffs never would have given
credit to Ogleby and Budd. The letters of the
Defendants to Ogleby and Budd, dated the 9th
mid lath of July, complained of the heavy ad-
vances they were under for them, to the amenut t,f
6.500/.; that they were under these advatices fur a
space of three months; that they felt great disap-
pointment at the want of punctuality on the part of
-Ogleby and Build ; and that if they had not expect.
ed an earlier reimbursement, they would have de-
.eliised the commission altogether. The letter of the
Nth of July signified the intention of the
• dents to close their accounts and tramactiutis with
Oglrhy and Budd.
Mr. Jublileg DALLAS—" Did it appear to the
eJury from any evidence laid before them that the
Defendants had any motive, or were likely to reap
any apparent advantage, from making a false rem..
mutation of the character of Ogleby and Budd to
the Plaititiffs?"
Mr. Serjeatit litit.hoce--‘ My Lord, I am nut
prepared to say that such evidence appeared."
Mr. Justice Dat.eas—., Mr. White was examin-
ed on the trial, mid his evidence went to (thew, that
at the time that the house of Ogleby mud 114,41(1
were introduced to the Plaintiffs, they were ill solveht
circumstances and in good credit; their credit did
not begin to fail wad the month of September or
October subsequent to the introduction of the De-
felidauts. One of the ..raters of Buil lieuse was
remained on the trials and he swore that at the
time of the introduction their house was in se: good
credit as ally young house in the Medit(rninean.
Another *ahem, who was a clerk to Ryland
and Co., was also produced on the trial. and he
swore that the house of Oalehy mud Budd Wiere 111 V
tardy, he had no suspicion whatever of their Cif-
cu instances."
Mr. Serjeant fIULLOCIE—." My Loud, I do not
think that the evidence of Mr. White, who swore
to large numbers, rod whose testimosty was grossly
erroneous—and still less the evidence of not of the

firm, whose character was concerned—nor sveO ;1;
notions, incorrect es they were, of one sal ItylAntl's
clerks, ought to avail. The asked question was,
whether. at the titne that the Deleodautii intro-
duced Ogleby and Build as a house of credit aid
respectability, they did not know that house to he
imulveut, at least embarrassed ? That they knew
dos, was evident from their owls [oleos. A keg the
failure of Ogleby and Co. Use Defewlentv, who
were not applied to on the subject, giattrittitisly
wrote to the Plaintiff. that they too were I.e.rrs ow iu
to the failure, and so full of confider we ‘si re tioc,
that they continued, up to she last matnent, to give
the firm extensive credit. Now, Oils av,rstisas was
manifestly untrue, it was contradicted by I Ilt ir own
letters to Ogleby and Budd, in which they expre,..
ed their determinetion to close their 1 faliftwel 1111.4
with thut house; and it was contiolicivil Is) the
account current which they furnished." Muler all
the circumstances, the Learned Siajeic:t sul (tell
that were it not fur the false colmiiicg of the D.-
feminine, the Plaintiffs never would.liure rvrn
cre-
dit to Ogleby and-Badd ; that they, the' Dereort-
ants, had •been guilty of *a wilful atippreasson tit eta
real state of that house, in cooiequestee of wiasesi
the Plaintiffs sustained a loss, fur %birth the De-
fendants should be accountable.
Mr. Justice DALLAS—It was not now ii.c.aeary
to consider whether the Jury came to a hrq,tr 4.r
improper conclusion; lie thought, however. lila
Learned Brother went ton far in charging the De-
fendants with a fraudulent suirtneasion of tl:e.
truth. •The case was tried by a Speck* Jury of
London merchants, and they negatived the impu-
tation of fraud. The question was entirely hit( 44
them, whether the Defendants were guilty or a
suppression of facts with an. intention to .trirau•l
the Phi' •It's ? They decided otherwise, and their
verdict unicluded the case.—Motion refused.
•
IA'SOLVENT DI:B7IMS' COURT.
The business of yesterday was quite uhintere4-
ing except ID the parties concerned, slid this t:llUrt
was occupied during, the whole day in hearmg
loug and tedious examination* of Caste of tittlifig
importance. •
As the Court was about to rise,_at four o'clock.
a well-dressed female, who raid her name was Solo-
mous, raid she lout a complaint to tame .1116101 u t
one of the agents of the Court, wKO heal
taken her caster (she laid hero just diachgr44;i:
der the Act), and not ouly urglected b •
but took her *gooey for nothing.
The Court ordered the Chief Clerk lb Wit the
lady's documental awl .aka ti4:werrio tssl I 7
termitic her to bring her case solo Court,

fi

• . , , .
thr c"lilY• who selecting a proper opportunity for anhnsitttng a bad done ss great deal of business with theni.
id met tq turnailer.,,, outguns to the Cowl, asuf tbat-tlury considered them in good credit. In
had out lit.kall
.11.0 Y 4.., Mr. JthilliCe,BA y Loy and Mr. Justice But can.. sorisispiewcs of those representations. the Plaintiffs
oche ter.;' . limed together for a few moult*, after whittle it •sltipPlaa burs el wheel to 011iebY and B•dd. t•
son for Botgbity, ... we. intimated to Mr. flout that ha Illiglit proceed., durendstiofll4ool. is was not necessary. the Learned
sbonlostkout. Mile 1 , Mr.,Hy as sgid, ha held to* logisLap alkingiot. ilsajosub asbarittod. to show that soy collusion
ottuc, •4;riftiospd.i explanatory of.Abst mothiapu—hVlmitbtokte yak% rafiiatoh4sonweett oho Dereodesta and Ogiaby sod
1.,
.bviia He had. ou the yr.kipahlauflosh4rgigmk,ipp:ols haModdo al dotaras alyesoary-woo We, to shoo that

- ...• . . .
,
• Lir, 1.,1VT E , ,
Cowl to arolii, te..tcliltrt *thy a criminal to. at the time that tl
fitentatoss should i egoista James Norriiii, I saotations to the
• . il • . ia
other MINIIIITNIes of Mitscboster, whiCh that these reprove
~ . , t0.4,),t1Zi ••• X . •a! .- : • l' •
: 111 •-• I leifeitillioani, ,On tlitak acemion, he Mr. Jitatice D,
ni tf, rinuti--fi: FM Oajka 4 : 0 a. .it. ,I . • .
.. Nitibi *es tif4ted. Mot • k,firrllkideatreted lases ithoor rept.%
• ' tilbiesastospisised,4l4l#l/114,11/Akletior W" stVeliffie aright krill Ali 'l43l%ica 440 the wisethrr they war.
40,441/4/010141 I 11"6_,.._ ei1itid...............". 446.114fti t ;PU46411.1' tat . ' "iat that NB proseeit4a its tifte Xing'. porty, aud were
Poliewirgllyekt64llo"""l""mw:- ' I".• ' : ' • ''''' , ; wett to sohntitted 10 'the Coin bay the At- mitre.
.•. ~ h;i # „....;.„,,ta .P.l.'' 1 . I'4 lim's lid • • •or Sulicitot-GettemYiLthey bkiog the ergo- Mr. Serjeant I
Mr* Ilfeffelli! 4111'welistnriflpiltu " ' .11e1.0.-lir Officers of tbs. '10114.111. He Bad j.endered to elorie that the
• -4*.'lll"=trAti•l49wayttlikli ll.' d'kk Ileahnrit. to the Coirt; to prove th.V it woe 'Derby and But
I 1,14 i .I,i Waft ~ '''."'"' . r 'L+
;14
li"
nS
n 1111 P invariable practice of the Costa, from the knowledge of the
01181beridiffioulhicas tr. WILLA* dub ST
._ 4. e.-kruu'rtl period up to the death of the late Lord fitient—ttuit prii
onraiwwlldwouisoke iiiittriewityK al lurtitt" 41.1•14" ham" • Cliitfinstice Elleisborottglb fist the Pr.ottecitter, in Cases—it was not
limpof ofilifinflillaider CirrunisliniCes millerporCu-,, the usme
...i the King. to tell his own 'dory. if be 'made the !alas re
liar. It had bow trued soviet before Chief Justice• pleated, es well to the Court as to ilieJury; and .1 himself, it was no
Abbott. 36,1 Guildhall, each time with a different. .... Ar. -e ID-- •

-~-mss---_...___ _.___