The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser.
London, England, 1810-02-27 00:00:00

Seevetart et stAte, Is andertaLe the eatotGon of
*l►st•project ?-..Orrtainly nil, 1 sever understood
even (hit the project was drve ieil ou.
Waa yaw Lordinipcon.ulted by tile Majesty's
'Ministers U rlts the propriety of such a project as
tide nue them referred t., ?—I had conversations
certainty with the Secr!•tary of State upon it, but I
knew !hut ipandlbe were as'cril of Sir David Dim-
this and the CivniPerl Officers upon it ; l never col-
older& it as decidh d upon. but merely n prow, .1-
lion 'pude; it bud been the oriu,inil
Was the opinion of your Lordrhip asked upon
that project?—Not formally arkt.d as a Generdi
Officer.

Dues your Lordship know with whom that pro-
Duet origmated du not f,ed that I !•ait with p lo-
priety iiilMWer that queston ; I do nut know that as
• Geurral Offittr.

When wa+ it first aireed that any notice should
be taken of Cads.ind in the Expedition really
cannot state with any precision, it arose out of the
d wussions upon it ; but 1 should think rather
e.irl, 1 cannot st•tte exactly, so many different
I. oiret.i were arisinK every day, but I think
It
was
pretty earl: after the Espeilition was decided on.

34 your Lorekhip recollect it was a proposal
at a to time, and a proposal somewhat decided up.
that Cnlsand should be entirely neglected ?-
1 rather think not alter the Expeditious was in any
for.v.mlness ; I rather think Cadsand war %Limys
in.oste.l aeon, particularly by the navy ; I under-
stood so.

Did the importance of Cadsand appear greater
the more it WWI coueiJeied ; and was the force,
originally destined for that purpose, increased
gradually till it came to the dii.irion of the
army under Lord Huntley ?—I rather think the
importance of it was more felt erery
,day by the
navy ; greet anxiety we. expressed for a consider •
able forte being employed, but it is a mistake to
implies.. that the whole of Lord fluntl6i's
was destine I for the service of Larlastid ; there was
only one brigade destit.ed for the titmice of Carl-
son& the other division was destined to make a di-
versino near the Koowle Bonny. at the same time
Lord lliiiilley hut direeai n, , if necessary, to sup.
port the (nee that tni.iled cos Cadssuil ; brit it was
eWeeleii it would require wore than one bri-
ga'te at the trotia, I feisty one tegiment would
have been soffii.ient.
Was tour Lordship fortrishe 1 with any intaillio
grace of the amount of force you might target t to
find on Cailsand ?•-ii-1 think that very much appears
in the intelligence before the !louse; it was son-
posed to be extretnely small.
Was tour Lordship furnished with any
Reece of the amount of force you might expect
upon the Island of Walcherro ?—Noi further 61111
has been already laid before the Noose; Isola' inure
precise. .
Is dot date marked upon the intelligence pry-
tented by your Lordship, vie. the 15th of Octubet.
correctly sailed f—lt
Was that the time of its being drawn up ?--It
weans a great iueunre drawn up et that throe, end
therefore it hears that date ; I did not think it pro.
per to delteer it at that time, it we. not delivered,
accurst. till the 11th of Vehroury ; I had reasons
for not delivering it, but I thought it better to
preserve the date at which it is iis iu fict drawn up ;
there were after that nine none but verbal or criti-
cal alterations, I considered tits repent as finished
oti that day.
Is this the only narrative, or memorials or paPer
*fatty descriptiow, which has been delivered to Ills
Majesty by your Lordship on the subject of the
Expedition ?-1 have stated that this paper was
Ittepared its toy report of my proceedings in the
Scheldt, arid that it was delivered to His Majesty
as such on the 14th of Febtuary ; that is all I can
state npon the subject of this paper, which is be-
fore the Home.

%% sit there any other narrative, paper, memorial
or memorandum of any sort, delivered to His Ma-
jesty upon this subject by your Lordship ?—I have
already stated that this paper WAS prepared on the
13th of October; 1 aro very ready to state, if it is
wished. tile reason 1 slid not deliver it then ; the
reason I did not deliver it an•, that I did not think
that it was right for one to stale, in fact, what wools'
etnisti'ute my defence in ease army inquiry, Whe-
ther civil ur mil tars. that was the mason 1 did out
deliver it ; 1 did deliver it as trey report of my pro-
ceedings, on the 14:It of February; that is all the
explanation 1 can give on the subject of the paper
that is before the House.

Was any other paper. nernevo, memorial, or
memorandum of any sort. delivered to IN Majesty
upon this subject by your Lordship ?—This ;piper,
which is now before the House, is my official re-
port of my proceedings; when lam asked with
respect to any other paper, or In any other cire 00000 -
stances net coming tinder that d, in-option, I do
not feel myself at liberty to enter at all into any
exarainatioa of that sort, and 1
must beg to tie.
cline giving may answer to the question put to me.
Was the narrative now before the Howse sub-
mitted to auy of Hie Xlejesty's Ministers, either
officially or otherwise, previously to its being de-
livered to His Majeritc I—Not previously, it was
aubraitti ii to the Calimet the day that it was deli-
vered to the King.
Before or utter its delivery I—After.
Was env communication made by your Lordship
to rinv of ilk Majesty's Ministers of your intention
to deliver snch a narrative previously to its being
delivered '—lt was delivered after the Levee, I
think I stated to several of His Milesty's Ministers,
*set I meant to deliver it that day.
Did your Lordship 4, quaint several of His Mg..
r sty's Ministers at the Levee, of yoar intention to
• 'eliver it previously to its being deist...v(l
think I stated it merely iii .convermation. I award
to di liver it myself to the King, haviug received
my instructions under the sign-mannal, 1 thought
it proper to present my report immediately to the
King, which Wig afterwards laid before the Cabinet.
Will your Lordship hove the gendarme to state
which of Ilia Nlajesty si Ministers were present at
the Levee, and to which of them your Lordship
simile the communication ?—I really cannot rocs&
1.0, I Lelirn must of the Minters were therm
did not st-ste it to them in any official way. there-
fore it appeared very immaterial whether I stated
it or not.
Does your lordship rucollert that the eonclud-
un paragraph in the ni.irus Lions under the si4th
iss t:.(141, runs thus : is during your Lordship's

tinnance on this service, new ate to itzd, Or emit
to be sent to ns, through one of our principal Se-
cretaries of State, constant accounts teinitbat
passes ; and you are to follow all suds and
diecetions at we shall stud you, either under our
sign-manual, or through one of our priacipal Se-
cretaries of Stater—Certainly ; and I acted al-
ways in strict conformity thereto.
Can your Lordship state any reasons for having
deviated from the usual course under the usual
instructions (as I suppose these to be) of delivering
your narrative of such service through one of the
principal Secretaries of State ?-I.lting.on the spot,
I thought it more proper, in the situation iu which
I stood, to make the report myself to Ills Majesty ;
tt would have been open to rne, under that iiibtrtic-
' lion, to have made it through the Secretary of state,
bat I felt it wore proper to do it as I did, and that
it should go to the Secretary of State afte,avards.
Did your Lordship make any written communi-
cation by way of narrative or others ise, of what had
passed under your Lordship's command in the
Expedition to the Scheldt to His Majesty's princi-
pal Secretary of State on your return did not,
I thought my dispatches were sufficient.
Was any narrative or report required by any of
His Majesty's Ministers of your Lordship after your
return t—No. noire.
Was your Lordship asked officially by His Ma-
jrsty's Ministers, after your return, for env account
of your proceedings beyond what had Leen ow
veyed in the dispatches of the Expedition under
your Lordship's command sal not.
Does your Lordship recollect the circumstance
of an Address presented try the City of London to.
His Majesty on the subject of the Expedition to
the Scheldt ?—1 do perfectly ; and I believe the
letter which I wrote in conseqneuce is latrine this
House.
Was yrntri-ordship consulted by soy of His Ma-
jesty'a Alftpisteurpreremasly tirthe answer given by
His Majesty to that Addresa,:upon the satisfaction
he had felt with both the services upon the Ex-
pedition, to the Scheldt ?—I should have no •dif:
beaky in answering that question. I have some
doubts quite as to its propriety, as that question
cannot be a•lced of me as a military man. 1 had
cessed to be in the commaiid ; I saw never asked
officially any question upon i!. I believe, that by
my letter, which is upon the table here, it will be
sett, that I was no patty at all ; that I was not
present at ally dkraision whatever respecting the
answer to that Address.

When did your Lordship apprehend your corn.
mood to Cml4e, and that you Arrue not consulted us
a Genera' Offiter ?—I "OS hardly consultrd us
Goierral °Meer after my return. 1 c. 4.ed to lie
command Or the Expedition' i■ on the
25111 of September.

Was your Lordship collimated in your military
capacity 011 the propriety of retaining the Island of
Walehesen after your Lordship's return ?—I think
not ; not olico:illy ; I WIIS INIZeII some qiiestioos
connected with it, but Lau not think I yr.,' aslud
any di,tinct opinion upon it.

What were those questions your Lordship was
asked ?—I think there were some questions, per-
haps, respecting how far it was defensible, with re-
spect In the nu tidier of men it would require to gar.
Flinn it, anal .owe general questions upon the pro.
lvitility of an inundation, different circninst.stees
of that sort ; but I rtu not think 1 was called upon
miitsrily to state any. distinct opinion upon the
subject ; A is alluded to iu borne of nay dispatches.
I think.

Did your Lordship, in fact, state, either asked
or unasked, any opinion upon the propriety of re-
taining the island of Witlelicren ?-1 was not called
upon to make ant• report upon that subject. which
is the only way in which 1 can possibly consider 1
could give an answer to the question.
Your Lordship did not, of ynur own accords de-
liver any opinion upon that point as a military span
—No, f did not.

Your Lordship has stated, that your reasons for
not delivering your narrative to the King earlier
than the 14th of February were, that you chose to
reserve your defence till the time when any military
or other Mquiry might take place ; will your Lord-
ship state your rea3un for delivering it on the pre.
Mee day of' the 14th of February ?-••••I had no par-
ticular reason for doing it ou that precise day, ex-
cept that it happened to be a Levee-day ; why I
wished to do it about that time was, that I conceived
there was no objection, at that time, to my so do-
ing; and besides that I felt a dc.are„ that, as I had
not been called upon at that time to be examined
here, and that the Admiral had, my account of the
proceedings in the Scheldt might, in some way or
other, come before the public, and I knew that
could not be dour but by my delivering it to the
Ibis I here think it necessary to state, in addl.
tom, that one of the reasons why I wished fora cer-
ium time to delay delivering this report, was,
that I was in expectation that some ACCOSIIII of his
proceedings would have teen delivered in by Sir
Richard kitrachan; I had indeed understood that
lie had lean ed upon for something of that sort ;
I know that, with a view to it, lie had asked for par-
ticular reports and details of sclera' of the officers
under him. I conceived he would be called upon
to snake some narrative of his liroceedings, end I
was very aos.ians that they should both come Up
preciewly at the mine time, that I should not
our narrative tirst before any statement was given
ru by him.

From whom dill your I.ord,l.ip undervtimd, that
Sir Richard Strachan had been called ripon for a•
narrative of his proceedings ?-1 did not know it
from any gro'd authority, far probably the thing
would have takers place if I had. I allude to that
it loch was very generally understood. I knew flout
all the officers under Sir Richard Streator' had been
caked upon for minute reports of their proceedings.
I suppose I wus mistaken, or prolwibly a report
n,uhl have appeared. if it was called for from him
hut I understooi it frou rumour, sad 1 thauglit it
probable.

Wag it merrly from COIIII7IOO rumour, end lint
from any Obcial person, you had this report ?—I
do not think it was trom any official iwrtnn.
Or any tine who had berm an official per,on ?-1
think nut. .

Or cooaerted •itb kay official prrson ?—No, I
think not.

Did your Lordship lwlitve at the time ynsi `.i-
wired to that naryrLive to the King. that Sir It.

2c),Jo IrJ dtliv..ed io a natr.tive of arty sail?
—I did not ; I suppose: ceataioly Out.
Did 3 our Lordahip take any steps to comtottni-
cote In Sir Richard Strachati that yoit intended to
deliver iti such it oat naive t—Cert stilly inn ; I had
no coiganutticution with Sir It. Str.cioto trout the
tinte I left the Scheldt.
After the delivery of that Narrative, dill you Lordship take
any nitpstocommunicateittoSit It. St, Si. lima ma cer-
tainly tit/r, 'liar 1{110414 I hare fit myself (it I had been M-
ein...llo is) rrril justified wit I it.. not On what possi-
ble ground I could have comnounirat eel au unlit oil report *nada
to the King. I believe it was inured for the rely day after it
was delivered to the King; therefore bar It. Stiachau would
Lust it iu Clint 'ray.
Before your Lordship sailed upon the Expedition, load
your Lordship any consultation with one sir more, or the
whole of the General Officers emptily ell whirr you is the
Espeditiou to the Scheldt?-1 had a greet deal of eommusii.
cation almost daily with most of them that wime within my
reach ; I had au rosamnnieution with the char of throe to.
nether; they never were in the !MOW place of the range lime.
Did your Lordship kauw that there weir milder your com-
mand Officers who had been at Antwerp in the (vane of or-t-
-wice ?—Yea, 1 did.
Did your Lordship consult with those Officers individually
or collectively os the subject of the Eliedition ?—1 had
tonversaitme with than, or cousolted with thrill; no the
subject of tim Expedition; there were, I believe, wee or two
Officr is who bad bees there.
Will your Lordship hare the goodness to name who abuse
Officers were ?--Sir William Laskine bad bee.. Ihcer, I saw
him at Deal, and bad some COOrrrIMIOU With him 0,1 the
ruhject of the enterprise ; and I believe General Gi use ea..-
had been there,lie bad been, Intone, inn t tie 'Fete de liamire,
and I rather thick he was in Antwerp.
Did your Lordship ask or rere ire nay opinion from the
Geueral Officers Witter your COMUJAIIII, MI the IMMUltillty Or
improbahility of the amens of the enterprise.?—la is eery
difficult to answer that question ; it it as lemur In ask wise.
titer I culled upon any Grurril other, to give Mr a report of
his opinion ou the pruhabiluty or improbability of the !Mart.
prize,. I certainly did out. I hail a Deal deal of ritisat na-
tion a ith dilieent Onierro, bat their opinions must limes.
eerily vary from timc'tto time, acemeletig to intelligent* mad
ether circumstance.
Dom your Lordship recollect a particular conversation
with Sir John Hope, at Deal or Ramsgate, ire the inkjet t
of the probability of success or failure .--I think I hail a
good dent of eonversatiarri with Sir John Hope at Deal, or the
general operations to he pursued; but I du not think that
bar lutto Hope stated to tar all distint I opintou taste way or
the other, as to the probable success or failure of the enter-
prise.
Did your lordship deliver to His Majesty nay other nar-
rative memorial, paper, or tnensoriendino, relative to the
Email/lion to the Scheldt, besides the um.: *bah is mow upon
the table of the House of Commons ?--I bare said that I deli.
vexed, on the isth of rrlortaitry, to His Majesty, say official
Report of any proreedings m the Scheldt, 1 must he tinder
the necessity ul persisting inlay determinist post of declining to
mower soy further question upou that •Mrject.
As Coutinander.in- Chief of the Expeditiou to the Scheldt,
did your Lordship deliver to His Majesty, any other paper,
narrative or mannorouitreen respecting the operations of that
Expedition, besides the nu:afire now ton the table of the
House of Cueaurau ?-.11 can give sat other answer, thew
that 1 hare already ; I have stated, that I delivi•reil Stay ,
repeat, as Commander of the Expedition, to the Kiley, us
ter calk of February.
Glum what grounds does your Lordship 'erase to naswer
the question just pioposed ?--1 decline moments' the ques-
tion* ; I bare stated all I did in my nitlitliary capacity, !hick
is, that I delivered my official report to the King, us
thr lath of February; taut the cuutents tat that repute I atm
rtatlY to Fire any iatiwination.
1 understood your Loselship to say, that your military ea.
taaekr ended on the astk al Septeiniter, tiro your bordstiip
faudaj at Deal ?.-No, nut lily military capacity ; that which
fettled as to my military capacity es Comusander of the
forces cuaseig, was with reference to questions as to the dm
fence of Watellicren ; I do nut apprehend that nay military
capacity ceased, bat !conceive that I continued 'lastly amen-
able to way Court of 'equity or any Court-Martial.
Does pose Lordship Weise to answer the question just
proposed on dissnons4 of your being a Pr:vy Counsellor ?
—7 refuse it I.llllBrally. I decline aura rein the question.
Did not the capture or destruction of the enemy's fleet
faun one of the material objects of the Expedition to the
Scheldt ?—lt certmaly did. It was so described in the in.
steactions

Did your Lordship know, prior to your sailing from Eng-
land, that the frees Is deet could put itself smiler the pro.
tertion of Ilse Indierire at Antwerp had nu very petvise
isformatim communicated to me upon that sitiMeeth it was
rather a naval question.
In the event that your Lordship should find, se loular ar.
rival, the fleet had so put itself in protect' under the cita.
del of Antwerp, mid that your Lordship should find the
citadel And the town of Antwerp in a state of defence, had
your Lordship in this country formed say determination as
to what were le be your Lordship's operations under those
circumstances 3-1 have before said that an precise plan of
operations ems fixed upon before I left this country; it must
have depended entiiely spim circenistances, sad the intelli-
gence when we a:rived.

In the event of your Lordship's lading the enemy in pls.
session of no stun ready to take tin held alpinist your Lord-
alup's artily, but in a state of defence in Antwerp, bad your
Lordslup tbrined wy detcnninatiou as to y one operation,
w►ether you would, is order to destroy the Beet, as one of
the peat objects, twiner Antwerp ?—I had feigned no d.•
tersnientosa belie, I wcut ; as I said, that must depend upon
circumstances at the tine.

Tilt,' 'MI( Lordship had formed no plan of operation,
prior to your sailing from this courant ?—:rio detailed plan
of operations.
Did your Lordship, on your arrival in the Scheldt, Ind
the state art Antwerp and the preparations of the enemy in
the field and the fortresses, such as was represented to your
I.orilship to be the state of the enemy prior to your Lord-
ship's saihnyt from this country gradually obtained in-
formatiori as Men MI I could of the stole of the enemy%
force, and the stale of Antwerp, I did not hod auy such in-
formation on my arrival iu the Scheldt.
Did your Lordship lad that the state of the enemy's fur.
tresses at Antwerp and on the Scheldt, and the ninny's force
as Antwerp, and to the neighbourhood ail' Antwerp, on`yeor
Lordship's arrival, to eorrespond with that represented tube
the rime of those• fortresses, and of that hirre, prior to your
sailing Crum Liigland ?-1 ►ad so amain of knowing the state
of Antwerp; rim my antral in the Scheldt, t obtained gni.
dually informatiors on the subject.
Prior to your Lordship's railing from England, had your
Lordship any intelligesicc as to the *late of Autwerp, sag the
strength of the corm) us Antwerp mod its neighbourhood
I bad nu mine prei no• information upon that subject than
what is contained 110 the 11111 hornet. that is before the Nouse.
Doi your Lordship Snit that intelligeoce correct Iww4 du
not knew how to answer cleat questioisesactly, or how !could
eret ascertain whether it was cooed 1 kat siseant to be asked
whether it was correct at the tone it wee gives.?

Whether the state I n which your Lordship found dm
ear my and his fur 00000 es on your orris's, in the Srhtldt, cur.
responded wit► that represented to your Lordship lobe the
state of the enemy prior to your Lordship leaving this caten-
ary did out bud ou toy arrival any information on tLis
subject, I acquired iiihirocitiou gradually of the strength of
Antweip and the enemy's force

DM sorb information as your Lordship (rodu.klly acquired
after your arnval there, correspond with the idlisteation
picrimwly rmetsed here •—I think not entire') as to t:te state
of Aolecrp.
. . _

Dol it materially darer as to the state of Aul acrp
litre that the intellezeisce, no for as it rent, not immedials•
ly on myarrival, lost ni ■ sulnwqnent lime, went to state that
the works of Antwerp hail heels pot ale a stein a repair.
Dom your Lordship hw beve that the works of Antwrrp,
psi ticularly the citailcl Id Austiorp, were mot put into a
silo of repair sold after the arrival of your Lordship to (Inc
Schrhlt should fancy heftwe that time, but 1 csaaot
■peak correctly.
Had your Lordship any intrllmenee before you sidled
from !kis cuuNiri, tint Ito peso of the citadel of Antwerp
comnisoded what ;tie callrd thr smells!' at Antwerp
betere 1 bays alriia.ly alumtattl lb 41 cocattota.aa fat s 1 ass

ghat
4bj to .lo it Uld IL certain • I I,;foz, year
Puec.
Did your Lued.:Lip expert when yott slited in find 4„.
weep in a had state iit defence, troth a. to us
Sad its listriwou ?—A great deal of the intetilizaer
•eitt to that effect.
DA your l‘ordaliip Usw ruy prirtte of ronfij,.ntig..
its uct ion* to the Gement l/Giecls under tbut romans,'
cauutit 'perk poutieely. but I at.prclu let the jostrarb„..,
at Waal ninny of thew, to the “metal Otht.ern, opobin,
table uf the MANI.

- )our lAiritakip fureislard with heavy art:lirly sak,ak
to the siege eJ Antwerp, in thr event .4 us bt.og uremia
undertake a singe, Md.:petition a. of that used 1, the ,sus,
Flushiux t-1 cannot names. Hat guar:sou, w.thuut loosul
mailer wild' circumstances it is a taut.

%Va. your Lordship furnished, prior to your ar.Vs):
this tumidly, with heavy olds:ince, in the etc,o
necessary to andertake the viege Antwerp htia
ordnance sitifywisi to usdertalir that siege, inikiie;idrut
of
the ordnance for the siege of Flushing, snideji.i,i t, „we
your Lordship to carry us the twu sieges at uure if
sary —I ant afraid I assaut perfectly aaswei 11..1
without knowing what circumstances nre riippowa ter 14
whether, under the circumstance id Antra .11 kiiit
in a perfect state of defence, and with a sufficieut
garriso Or under any tidier sapptisition.
Under the supposition tither ut Antwerp being suffiriexii,
rirrisimod, and In • inaivt.: 10.41.) of defence, mid Ilin
would be necessary to undertake w regular 5e)7..,
furnished with heavy lino tai s sufficient to
the town, in the event of &I li,pubardimarut beiag reknit,'
bt
—that i• n professional question which I donut Lan haw
to arnaver, aides, it is accurately stated; I de ail penes,
ly take I ias yursto.u.
Was soar LifiMdp furnished with a sufficient, of heat
artillery to enable you to carry on the two *per/Isms, lb..
one against Antwerp and the oilier against Flashing, al rya
.ante time ?—I had a sulli::ieucy of heavy artillery Is prefor,
tat/0640111C strength uf Ikm army. I certainly bail not 4.14(Ni
iry of at ;nor was It in runletirililliells. for the ,°, fly
town and cita:fel of Ants erp, ,upposing it tu iu repair sag
garrisoned, ani li a siege could never hate Isr3
contemplation witlistlie army I conssauded. I wish to
that there tens a sufficiency of orillianci• In aut (N, 1.0, bitty
burdineut ; but in the event of a ii:ege, the litaiy sta.'s
for the Expedition ag.uitat Anita., was to he famished by
the navy.

(His I.o.nishop was dirt Ord to stillaJnor
fThe Ciaairm %lAA ecird to trjoaa t roves., and tali
kart to .at nasal j

THE BRITISH PRESS.

1 ,ON DON,
TUESDAY, Far, 97.
. --raw • 4,.

Captain RICHAILDstiN, of . !hip !lector, v.
rived at Liverpool, ou raid freer Tarn,,,,
which place Ole left on the t.,ita of January. 1.:.e
cAptini nirotions that the Spaoiarda had gaited
a lune; victory ever the Fieuch army in Catthsata,
and that it wee eurre:itly frpo..tell and behev.i.
that thu had set pwsseaahni of 'Luc-
loisa,ut the dun: he left Spain.

Five transports mimed at Coil: on Monetit
weet, rom Lisbon. • • They formed part of a let
which ralel. friun tliot port, under the protection at
11s Itlaav:str's ship Semiramis. Capt. Casacvs.
The Semiramis, aith the other part of tke lint,
pot, into CrJokhaveu.—When the Ceuroy left Li.-
bun. the British troops had marched fioin tha
city to j"in Lord WoLualorox's army in the
North of Portugal.

We give, 'his day, it length, the evidtoct of
Lord CIUTiIAVI upon the IVetcheree itayalry.

An Inquest was held, yesterdsy, upnn the hotly
of the Hun. Mr. Eine, and the verdict wit.," f•niwl
dead in the River Thinnest, at Itia past 12 o'clock,
on Sunday nioruing, the 25:11 of Febru:::y, 1810,
but how, or by what meaus, un evidence threes(
has coat 'before the Jury."—Mr. V I it Is-
lam's, has lost uo time to disho,e of the Tellets:ss
of the Exchequer, held b) the thice4sed. It its
been given to Mr. Y.OIIIIIE. A sew writ was secant.
ingly moved, last night, in the House of Commas.
C..r Cambridgeshire, to return ■ Member iu tie
room of that Hight Hon. tientlernoo.

We have received a letter from Ni.utia;naf•
datrd the 10th of hat tuoath, from o hick tar iai•
lowiug is au extract :

" 11AST111/QUI, JAL 10.

Brigodier-Gen. Illaacoui-vr- conne (rem St.
Croix to be employed in the Eapedirion ageing'
Guadeloupe. Every thing is prepared, and se vs
only waiting for orders. ERsolur is said to be th-
ttrisaned upon • sharp resistance, but I thigh it
will be but short. Our army is amazing'y sell Ir
pointed. We carry with us two tiue black up-
metro. in two or three days we shall probably
Oa Monday se'irnight, ■ geoerat meeting of the
Catholics of Wexford war held "at the Court-Boom
for the purpose of taking into consideration tits
oppression, under which they labour, end adopting
measure% for their entire removal. A number af
appropriate sod spirited resolutions were entered
into. It gives us extreme satisfaction to tied hat
the people are not insensible to the parr one aid
indefatigable exertions of their eouritryinni, ED.
WARD Hay. To this Gentleman the inhatetsele
of Wexford hare returned thanks, for the sea
which he discovers in sdrocating the move of •
much-injured country. History will record. 11:4
posterity will admire, thew
uncommon effort, ithists
this worthy and highly-reppeetalele patriot . Em-
ploying. to mile Irishmen to that rank which Oa
talents and their eirtue•deeerv-.
A new Farce, iatitltd, w h is or /live," ear re-
dated at the Lyceum Theatre, last slight. It le the
production of Mr. POCOCK. the anthor of tt
Arta." produced. Of the monomer. at t 11•
Theatre. It is one of the beat fames of modcrir.dint•
and promises a long and Inicremfol career. t
4: fe, bustle, and lionrour, it awarded *mutant awn. -
merit to a roost brilliant Awl crowded aiidtrito•
Mauro:. initiiiTnni, PENlfif. KNIGHT. DIC9)II.'
Iv% had ruts adidirably adapted to their
and displaying a rich Mild of genuine burrow hull
the pert of Cipher, by Mr. Marritcws, stood P"'
eminent in the galaxy of `tare. Cypher is a r Atm-
ney, and Member of Four-in-bend Club, 4,1
lie
foibles nod re centricities of which, err bit off with
exquisite sk 11. A smog in character, d est:nide,' old*
Jr-archers whom he meets in o abort drive fot,s!
town, was given rvi Ii the heppiesertfee and mcoreff
with &Ilion issin. We regret that she presserl
!
of mare weighty matter obliges us to defer • Ni
mecca:et of trim' mast tnterraing pitCy•

LON Doi4 :—Pntoor.l ts) C. Algal!, Ifiss t, Ciseerei •
41•,1 ptblabed .t the Other. N. Dark of Fl nemrMl
CLarrlis pt. and. by J. Wier., of .as. plate
&r. far is Paps:. *eel le lbe (p•gt-rani), 9'l
L.
duly &limit's/ M.