The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser.
London, England, 1825-12-17 00:00:00

COURT OF KI

CAUSES TO DE TIMED THIS DAT IN LONDON, DT SPICIAL

Andersch v Lsidlow
Values v Decker
Homer v CollaUf

NG'S BENCH.

Dempsey v Robbins
Bradford v Levy
Dickup v Merrick
IT COMMO)t Stint!
Boaanquet v Barton
Thorington v Lance.
field
Holt v Taylor
Same v Luntley
Dennis s Pigeon
Flan v Jones
Price v Sharp

Sherwood r Sears
Ham p.on 'Heywood
Wood r Chessman
Darla r Lomas
Whit*ll r CArtwright
Knight r Harvey
Carter r Slater
Bradburry v Plunkitt

Wilcox r 31arshall
Lloyd r Arhby
Weston v Appleton

Noble v Laver
Rippingham vWhite
31endal v Burrow
Webb v Prated
Holland v /Hocked
Lightfoot v Tonge
Wragg v Want.
Jones v Abbott

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS.
CAVSES TO BE TRIED THIS DAY.
Jury—Fendall v Hunter.
BY COMMON JURIES.
Neilson v Metcalfe Pickersyrill v
Rowe r Bark Thwattra
Flounders and others
v Bleck

Luke and another •
Barrow and another
Bake sod Wife •
Venice ;executor)
COI

SITTING T
Smith ♦ Russell, on I

'IFF OF EXCHEQL'
ITS DAY, AT ORAY.II
Hesterrnan vColernan
Evans v Williams
II
Bamford v Archer
Birmingham v Boar
Hamilton ♦ Earl of
Strathmore, on Seq.

Commisro. Certif.
Fielder • Aleynell,
pert !leant
Hoghtoo it. Masters,
by order

'ER,
INN HALL.
Wade v Stubington
IVatkina v Smith
Gale v Walters
Rawley v Caner
Mau v Nixon

LAW INTELLIGENCE.

COURT OF CHANCERY, FRIDAY, DEC. 16.

COMMISSION OF REVIEW.
TOWEL V. MOLICHIT.
Or. LUSIIINOTOK. Mi. PEPE', and Mr. 'WAKEFIELD were
heard in this cause. The further hearing was postponed to Tues-
day next.
LATHAM V. PAR VT.
At the rising of the Court the LORD CHANCELLOR said that a
very important clause bad been struck out of the bill of excep-
tions in this cause, which was handed in to him a few days since.
Re thought the insertion of that clause neectsary, in War to bring
the question fully before the twelve Judges.

No art et p
to-day.

, Itup.ef, Dsc. IG.

in chit Court

COURT OF RING'SIiENCH, GUILDHALL,
FRIDAY, DEC. 18.

The LORD CMINV JUITICZ sat its London to hear Special Jury
Ceases.
LIBEL.
RUCEINORAM MAXIM, MP.
The plaintiff iv the celebrated traveller, and the editor of the
Oriental ET enthi ; the defendant, the member for Corfe Castle.
This action was brought for a libel contained in the following letter
from Mr. Bankes to John Murray, Esq. of Albemarle street.
" Sir—l hare received a letter from my son, dated Thebes (in
Egypt) l2th June, which is the occasion of my troubling you. Ile
informed me, that a person, named J. S. Buckingham, introduced
himself to him some time ago at Jerusalem, under the pretence of
being an intimate friend of Colonel Aliseett, and also of the late
celebrated traveller Mr. Burckhardt; that in consequence of this
supposed friendship with two so respectable men, and so well
known to my son, he permitted Mr. Buckingham, whoa. destina-
tion was to India, to accompany him for some time, and to take a
copy of that part of his journal which was kept during this portion
of his travels.
This ill.placed confidence has been requited in the way that
such acts of kindness usually are by ungrateful and worthless
people. Mr. Buckingham announces his intention of publishing
his own travels, of which I have before me an elaborate and pom-
pous prospectus in a Calcutta newspaper.
" I know not whether you have ever heard of this projected
work ; but as it is intended to he printed and published in Landon
In a splendid manner, it is very probable that application may be
made to you before it Kee the light, in which cave 1 wish to rut
you on your guard against having any transactions with such an
author as Mr. Buckingham, and also against laying before the
public parts of a very estensive and curious tour. In an imperfect
state, which I hope and trust that my son will be induced to sub-
mit to them in the best and most complete form that he can put
his valuable researches Together whenever he returns.
" You will oblige me by making known what I communicate,
with regard to the character of Mr. Buckingham and his intended
work, in any way that you may deem proper ; and I remain,
" Your obedient servant,

" H. BANKES,

" Hington Hall, 11'imbourne, Oct. 3, 1819."
This case was set down on the special jury list for this morning,
but no special jurors having been summoned, • common jury was
sworn to try it. when
The AVrottatte.Orataat. rose, and said that his client
would not occupy much of the time of the Court. He had origin.
ally put • justification on the record, which he had now with.
drawn, and was willing to submit to a verdict for the plaintiff
with nominal damages, which he understood the ether side would
accede to. _ _

Air. BROUGHAM. foe Mr. Buckineharn, rcpued, that as the
only object his client hall was the vindication of his character, and
that having already been fully effected by the former trial, he hod
no objection to the proposal of the defendant, he haring withdrawn
his justification, and undertaken to pay all the costs u between
attorney and client.
The Lotto Cii E F JUSTICE expressed his satisfaction that this
matter had so terminated.