The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser.
London, England, 1822-05-21 00:00:00

L4W INTELLICENtR.

COURT OF CHANCERY, Livideues
Mom,Ay, MAT 20.
Tli;s being the hot day of Term, the Court was
occupied in hearing motions, of no interest ex.
cent to the !sorties concerned.
The first Seal after Term will be on Thursday
1021.

COURT OF XING'S BENCH, Weermsmistli,
MONDAY. MAY 40.
JUDGMENT.

THE Et.to tt. •RIONSVIITH, WEAVES, mind
!market!.
Thio muffling these Defendants wereitrosight rip
foekidement for a series of unearned libels ou her
lore Mairriy in the John Bell newspaper.
Mr. Justice Ba•LZY, in pining the sentence of
the Comet, ohrerved in terms of reprobation on the
pritelirhert, which went very far indeed be.
vend the belninls of fair docuasion. The libels for
...Filch the Defendants were now to answer having
..fieurs ell published before that libel for which the
Defendants were suffering the sentence of the
Cote, was so fir, in their favour, as the Court
weld hive considered it • great aggravation of
Their ',fierier had they been published sulorequentlyt
In ronoideration of the state of the defendrot,
Arroirsioith's, health, which would he endangered
a prolonged imprisonment, according to the
offidnira of himself and Ins medical attendant,
she -orovenc• oldie Court. as it regarded him. was,
that he Pltnnlel pry • fine to the King of 3001. ;
the Defendsios Shackell and W to be mini.
ruined three mouths in the King's Bench prison, to
be computed from the termination of their present
cnnfinement; to pay each a fine of 1001. ; and all
Drroliiiiitto to find sureties for five years,
them-elves in 5001. each, and two sureties iu 1501.
each.
THE EING v. WgSTMACITT.
• Mr. COMMON SIBILANT and Mr. CHIMES
Illt.t.trt shelved rouse against a rule Nisi. for
-criminal information against the Defendant, pro-
prietor of a periodical publication called The
Goseile of Fashion, for an alleged libel publislitul
in that work on • person named Fielder, who was
therein represented as having been instrumental to
the death of his Men brother, of being beeper of a
}gambling-hose, &e. Mr. Fielder, in his affidavit,
had negatived the first part of the charge. The
learned Cosneel for the Defendant contended,
therefore, that the latter charge bring true, the
Defendant was not entitled to thin extraordinary
interference on the part of the Court. but tbit he
ot.oofd be left to his ordinary remedy by action or

Judi. tment.
1 he COURT caiociderkg is Ant opiniou, discharg.
ed the rule.

LoNDuN siallieti3. •

• Vettersisty the,, !Sessions consmeneed before tbsi tried
'Maser, Recorder, Common-Serjeant, •Iderst■ Sir 11..5m
sloe, limes,. Thorp, sad Bridges.
The Recontown is clam/lug the Grand Jury, said there
'Mere bus few crimes in the Loudon list compared wish that
Vtie Middlesex, a eirramassme, no &Dohs, °snag to floe greet
'•Mulish, of the City Magistrates sad Policy. He requested
es:sbe st testis., of the Grand Jar, to say case respecting the
wh eh paraded the streets in so dangerous a mass-
per, and hoped they would afford oppurtiniities of patting
euwa smelt saimpees.
• gentleman aim was failed upon to attend as a Jaw,
begged la be emerged as the grouud of his oot being able to
bear at both ears.

1 hit COURT pat row cpairationo to the applicant, which
he heard perfectly well, sod there arose Is the Court a he-
sitation as so his bear privileged to absent himself.
The Common S (Mr. Derintaa) interposed, and
void that a Juryman certainly neighs to have an ear for oat
ride of . rase, as well as fur tie utber, in order to decide
with jostice.
The COURT being decidedly of the Common fferjeanee
opinion, the application war granted, and the Gtinticma■
with the one ear r►as suffered to depart.