The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser.
London, England, 1821-01-27 00:00:00

the lime, Niles-lain the rinalleal doubt of the legality of the
advice which they had tendered to his Majesty. If, as the
Nobk Leed.argeed, the Act of Uoiformity rendered it ion.
pesatire to insert the name of the Queen, it was.equally
imperative to insert alt the Royal Progeny; but in point of
fact, them were numberless instances in which the Royal
Progeny bad not been inserted. There was in the Act no
word which separated her Majesty from the Royal Priiiieny„
so that the practice and the Act of Uniformity exhibited no
variance. But considering it as • question of discretion,
the whole of the cirenenetaeces most be hided at ; sod here
the King and Queen had foe a length of time been living in
a states! seperatioe, a separation acknowledged by an Act of
Partitionist. " It must also be recollected," said the RI. Hon.
Gest." that our intention sad desire was, that as arraagement
shook, be made for her Majesty 'e coo i•ned resident, abroad,
and ceasing to hear the style and title of Qiicen, and that
the. we had meat to expect the proposition would have
been acceded to." The RI. Hon. Member, in continuation,
said, that had that arraegeasent been completed it would
have been as abourdity to have advised her Majesty's same
to be placed to the Liturgy. Bring ultimately obliged to
tiring the matter before Parliament, it would have been
rather estraorditsary if they had began by advising his
Majesty to confer the honour of insertieg her Majesty's
name la the Liturgy. Had the Act been imperative it
would soiliinbtedly have relieved them from their dialcult ire,
became, it would then have been a mere ministerial act,
suvolving ins eosteequeoces whatever. But as as net of
discretion, and having in their pow., the (cease of making
tont change, ha was not called upon to justify she whole of
their coorlect ; opportunities would occur fur an examination
into every pert of it; but he would repeal, that having
cient messes to reader that charge advisable, the alinieteredl4
not think it right to confer on the Quits that mask of Ws'
lunar and respect which insetting her name in the Liters"
world eudesbleilly have been. Had they dd.. that they
ought to have goer farther, and her Majesty should have
stood in that situation as if there had been no impute-
..

ios 'West bee—(Hear, Aeor, 4sae.)--Saase Walk Per-
haps, bare advised that her Majesty's arms slywalli hove
hero i.serted la the Liturgy, sad that she ANN bowl
been lodged is a palate, leseiag her to sink seder
impartation. which would 6,er rested upon lirr clutter-
"

tee; bet That would have been the molt unjustifiable step
width could have been adopted. and quite inconsistent with
all Shore high principles whirls it was affirmed bad been
violated by the Ministers. But it seems they had in-
sulted the Queen, betrayed sloe King, and brought the'
svitien to the very eve of • rebellion; and after all that
what was the Noble Lord's motion ?—(Hear, Lear, hear.)—
If they were guilty of all those irises (fur crimes they
were), they deserved much more Than the nsitigatrd cen-
sures of she Noble Lord's motion. If they escaped pumieb-
-111,111, it would be the worst possible owes fur the liberties
of the people—(Neer, Lear)—Aud it was the duty of the
Noble Lord to have taken soother course, and out S. hays

brought down n milk and water proposition like his premed
invites. It was true, some other and aller measure wag
hinted at by She Noble Lord. He reprobated that coarse
of proceeding, but supposed it was more conventual to
the Noble Lord to attack with the utmost •irnleace

of abase, sied shape his 'militia .i as t• embrace ratty

differeet Aside of opimou uu the subject.—(Rear, hear.).
Tie Petitions, on which so mock stress had bees laid,
nil prayed for the restoration of her Majesty's same t• t►e
Liturgy; and that object wss to be effected by an Address
to the King. The present mistime might be a hint to that
effect, but it was a mode of proceeding unworthy of the
theme of Consumes to proceed by hints sad inuendoe. In
sucks COW they ought to speak plainly, or sot at all: The
Right Hun. Member concluded by saying, that as the Noble
Lord's motion was not durect and simple, he shisuM meet
it by mowing that the House do now adjourn.
Lord A. HAMILTON esplained.
The question of adjouremeut was atm pet from t►e
Chair, when

re
Mr. HOBHOUSE rose sad said, as the Right Hosionrable •
' " Gentleman in whom allusion had been made was sot pre-
- oral, he should ant advert to that subject further thaw to
say, he thought the House had enneethreg better to do
than attending to the justifieatioa of say Right Hoomera.
egjf .^, bte &Pullman whatever; bat ie whet had heal eaid, he
_s. • thought he saw a parliamentary ....truce giving the cue,
sa it were, In these geolleasen who usually acted with the
Right Hun. Gentleman, and who had sot retired from office
as he had dune. He was surprised at the conduct of the
Right Hon. Gentleman (Mr. Robison) who had nut •t-
-• • ' tempted to offer any thing teethe legality of the course which
bad beets pursued. He (Mr. Hubhusee) was no lawyer,
but be would take upon himself lofty, that the owes pa-
ban& lay nu the Ministers to prove that in erasing the
Queen's name from the Liturgy they have sot been violating
the law.—(Hear, A ar, front She .9fiefsfertaf side.)—His
rmeue for saying so, was that from 15t6 to the present time,
pie Moaner uccssrred of a Queen Consort whose name was
omitted under similar cirearnotames; owe exireptine might
he said to he the ease of the Queen of George 1., but in
that instance she was sever reeogeised as Princess of Wales
or Queen of Paglasid, having been ',prated before the
Accession of George 1. The Hon. Member Ikea argued,
that these Learned persona, Sir Matthew Hale and lard
Clareadou, who drew sip the Act of Uniformity, could never
have imagined Ord change and 'her" would embrace
the word omit. The Rt. Hon. Gentleman (Mr. Robinson)
had only excused one fault by another, fur what he had said
amounted to lisle: that bed the Maiden acted correctly the
tasiten would have coast over and claimed sit her rights, but
lie had not 'hewn why she should out tome; am, toestahlish
their charges Ile Ministers had out gone to the sources of
correct information ; they had not examined her Majesty's
phystetan or those persons of tawnier who attended ors her;
het, so, they only gut a few loose charges on paper, and thew
thought they had a right to contumacy as act which he con-
tended was illegal. He would only allude to the evidence.
Ile (Mr. Huhltuase) had resided at Venire, and knew a limn
who was said to hr a principal witness, and whom it was
notorious there was nut a • reditile witness.— ( New, name )
—Bianchi, 1w believed, sons the mares name. Meister, ought
to have chews the state wecessity for erasing her Majesty's
name from the Liturgy before they had taken so general a
responsibility MI themselves. He was of opining' that the
Right Hun Gentleman, in inuring the adjournment, had
proved that Parliamentary tactics did not belong alone
to the side of the Howse lie had the bnauur of sitting on.
He cautioned Miniature against acting in contradiction to
the 'sayers of the Petitions which weer so numerously pre.
rated to the (louse; if they slid, the ir.msesponces that
might follow they would be aisswerahle fur.
Mr. WstrlerttrL said, he was primed to state
why the omission of the Qiierse's Hustle to the
Liturgy was woong, and he, its his own mind, was essimincesi
she reasons that brought him to that conches sow were will
f He was also of opinion, that ilw form sit the
:Visible Imam mottoes was correct. lie .1441 Ibink the Hight
Hon Gentleman had treated the siobjert smpropetly, as it
aired to Ise dt.ewwrdas an act, this jesty'. Ilsonders, nod
not f his 3lajcsty. If his °plosion us. the suLj.v t was rim-
\ was timidity taken, as it was a matured opii ...... .
Ilia Maj.,l)*) Mosist• es insist not think to get rid of smelt
most's. a• tier fora. sit by 3 sole winded ainesidnacist, for it
vas a spiesi nos of the lioOrest importance to the St Ile; and to
the rouul,y. for it was neither inure liar Ism sbass whether
the 6141111 e lea of the cono.try allowed the Privy Connell to
leave oat of the Lowrey the name of the Chorea Consort. It
sins mit jos individual sage they had to deride, but whether
any other Qn.eis ('uncurl'. 1w untitled by the
order of Our Privy CW.101'11; they wire called an to decide the
11111,14.34, a lit lilt s .1 Ullge of three rroilllrit• S6lllllll
lie Mot I tbstoltli ; it Woos 1101 11111 V au abstract rprestion, but
lona of a general Stall es I Ver.lll n.tsire, that the Consult of
the Kong Sao to be sle::r..ed.sl sirs stalled as Ilse Privy C ..... sell
thought proper, snit he ;largest the Minister's wish an act
sof Ilse grossest Weirs y w iliViat Osgood the Orris rof Cum..
r.I ..1 1,,A1n.,ty. The Hight llou Celillcu"
hod consist oltleol to ladlA asst welt r himets.see, lie would ar.
sere lion lie should hale 'tulle trout him. Ilis view of the
I the • a., tilt the Order In Coltelleti •••• eUllitary 1.4 the sta.
141. or Vistr“rmily. It was true that to the reign of Wary
VIII. the ('rows bad the power ui skiing alias it pleased
"is that mold. hut is. lit' ellen of Edward VI. Ibe Liturgy
was rata ; 010 toilitao oitl• NI /rigs, II NI 111 nail, r all. I .1-
11.1110 lint to that of I.isisr• I. it was thee same as al pret....i.
—The KifiK, Ito his eeriellja3tiejl l'harletee as head of the
imuld not alter she Liturgy, as it had heron'? ass Art
of Parliament, and assail was bound to he carried into effect