The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser.
London, England, 1819-08-12 00:00:00

WRIGHT r. PAGE.

This was an action by which the Plaintiff sought
to recover of the Deleodant, a miller, living at
the ant t due for building a mill;
the whole bill we• 1,000/. and the Defendant had
Maid upward* of 61)01.

Referred to orEouration.
YAUTIVI V. SAKFR.

This was an action to recover the RHO or 17/. Is'.
for stone and gravel raised by the Plaintiff for the
purpose of layiug upon the roads in the parish of
Stanton. A getieral order was given by the De•
fendaut, and it was proved that 358 loads were
raived and placed oil the roads.
O behalf of the Defendaot it was attempted to
be *hewn, that all but forty-five loads had been laid
by the Plaintiff on a road leading to his house,
agiiiiist the Delemlaill's order. who tendered 454.
The JuDGE. without allowing the Planitiff's
Couipiel to reply. expressed his opinion that the
Planitilf should hate it verdict.
Verdict for Plaintiff.
TIIF. KING a. PAULSON AND OTHERS.

This wns •n indietnirot preferred by the Rev.
J-11111..4 Burk, of Larrithinn, ngitinst the Defen.
(14nts (wlin had removed it by certiorari from Ilse
Quarter Ses,ums), for bgililig a bull in the rt►rrts
of that town.

I)tiring the progress or the indictment, the
Learned Judge suggested. that as there could be
nu right to bait bulls in • high street, however legal
it might be to de miss • field or Owe wbe►t the
public was not interrupted. if done in • proper
mintier without ceasing • riot. lie should weft.
mend a verdict of Guilty, mud that the Defeudauts
should not be brought up t. Judgment.
Verdict— Guilty.
EA IR%VEATIIEIt v. XI/WARDS.

Tlas action, which it a wt it of right, a proceed.
ing extremely unusual,. was adjourned in C 0.,.,.
quence of the Plaintiff's ini,biliiv to procure a lull
unenaniter of the Griond Assize. The 111111111/CT in
lb, bring the four Knights who attended at the
Last Assizes fur the purpose Of pommeling the
other IT. All the asosoinees attended, but unfor-
tunately not one of the choosers, two of whom are
abroad, and therefore the entire is likely to stand
over lin a length of time.
111.'e undmitand the full value of the loud in
question is 2001. and that the Defendant has been
in possession tilty

SPECIAL JURY.
SOANES V. FOWLER.

This was an action against the Defendant for a
trespass, and its initict pal object TINS to ascertain, the
question, whether there was a right of way passing
certain holds in the parish of Curtin), which had
under a recent Act of Etic!risme been allotted to
the Plaintiff. (hi behelf or the Plaintiff, it woe
I ed in etidriice, that prrontir had carver gone
(mut, the spot in question without making
acknowledgment ; but upon their crosa.euumniatioN
it e us sliewn th,it this Was not general, many haring
gone to and from the sea for the purpose of getting
water, and particularly fishermen having on
the hruch and brought up their cargo over the road.
There wa•, linatrtr, another question, which the
Learned Judge said must be a matter for the Court
abuse to (tete; mine. which wan.. whether the Act of
Path:tonna and the uouril set aside the highway.
The Jury.:siere, therefore, directed to return a
•rd, f - ski • of
rrs, at
"telt, WON
WeWI%
nrukrta
loud
of

having committed the harglary. TIT Plaintiff
proved the words as laid ira the declarat 11111 l and ihr
Judge was about to sum up to the Jury. whew a pro.
position to withdraw e juror was made Pry Drfri d-
ant, nod acceded to, thus leaviiig rash party to pay
his own costs. WI met made this actiol,
wee, that not only tlw parties tl►ru►selves are bro.
thers, hut tile principal witness uu the part of the
Plairititi was also a brother.

The Judges, with the Iligh Sheriff mill
other Gentlemen, dined on with his Grace
the Duke car Niirliilk, et F ham ; and nu (Unlu-
cky their toird.liips left this tos.ii IsOf Thnriiliam-
buil, near Eye, the seat of she Right Ilan. Lord
Henniker, from whence they proceeded to Noroicli.

THE TURN.

At Norwich Assizes, which commenced en Tors- abuse to deirt mine. which was. whether the Act of
r day, there are thirty-one county and four city pro- I l''''l'""'""t and the "uni set aside the Highway.
• worm for trial. Of those in the Castle, (me is for The. Jury.:orre, therefore, directed to return a
murder, one for feloniously killing and skyilig, one verd,ct for Oki Plaisitiff, subject to the opinion of
fir feloniously assaulting and stabbing, ohe fur the Court upon that point.
rope, one for arson, one for being accessory thereto, WILLIAMS V. WILLIAMS.
three for burglary, four for horse-stealing, two for The 'sorties in this cruse are brothers, residing at
cow-stealing, Eve for sheep-stealing, six for grind litidenhall, its iiiis emility„ aid the action was
itircerly, two foe uttering end hoeing base coin in brought to recover damages for defamatory molts
their posoession, one for a felonious assault, sod two spoken by the Defendant, concertos% the Plaintiff.
coannitted for want of sureties: of those in the City 'the Defendant's house, it appeared, was broken
Goo*, two are for house-breaking. one for bigamy, open iii the night of the 25th of December 184, loud
iLigfrigidisiamitimaismaisismainimairammineamesiodatissiasmaili,amama..' mkt win for Mani Bank wits. robbed, and the Defendant accused the Plaintiff of
i
' -I
' .:- .