The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser.
London, England, 1826-06-06 00:00:00

LAW NOTICES.

COURT OF
TRC LORD CHANCELLOR,

CHANCERY.
AT nSSTNIN sus, TRIO DAT, AT 10.

Williams v. Goodchild, appeal, p:rrvl:l7parte Grlmatead, petition per
heard judgment
Bray v. Fremont, appeal Glamis re Strathmore, two petitions
Dawson ♦. Fills In re Stockley, part heard, bankrupt
Same v. 'taken( Norfolk, appeal petition
!nicin v. Cope, appeal per judgment Expartc Pritthard, 2 bankrupt peti-
te re Sykes, bankrupt petition, per lions
judgment In re Watson, bankrupt petition

VICE-CHANCELLOR'S COURT.

..........
MORS ?Dr vICIL•LNANL/11.1.nR, AT IF/LSTMINGIDR, ?MS DATA AT

Att.-General v. Gough,
to lya spoke to
Hunt v. grunlson
Xing v. Woody
Wynne ♦. Jackson

UALV-PAS
Causes.
Same v. same Coutts v. Oswln
IVatkloson v. Hudson Chaddock v.Greeltough
Ponder v. Goodwyn Jones v. Kelsall
Howard v. Putland Parker v. Fearnley
Fletcher v. Nurtheote Att.-Gen. v. Leelnnore

COURT OF KING'S BENCH.

Special Cases to be argued this day.
Doe v. Somerville I Finch v. Birmingham Canal Compy.
Runt,rn v. Doe Doupnll v. Holland.
In pursuance et a Royal warrant, the Court will sit at Westminster
Hall, from Theiraday, the 15th, to Saturday, the 24th !nat. incin•ive ; and
on Monday, the Guth of October, till the end of the then current week, if
necessary.

MIDDLICRICX.
Nutlee.—The Chief dudlre will alt In lfiddle4ex nn Thursday, the 15th,
Friday, the Wth, and daily till Saturday. the 24th of June Inclusive.

!FILIAL JIIAINI.
Tuesday, 20th, Wednc"day, Slat, Thursday, 224, Friday, 23c1, and Satur-
day, 24th inzt. In order of entry, beginning with the remanent causes.
N.B.—Adjourament day, London, 2Gth June.
LUNDOV. . -

The Chief Justice will go to Guildhall on Friday, the 16th, for the pur-
pose of adjourning the Sittings from that day to Monday, the 26th Inat.
No canoes will therefore be tried In London on Friday, the 11;t11.

SISCIAL .11.11t11111.

Monday, July 3, Tuesday, the 4th, Wedne.day, the sth, Thursday, the
dth, and Friday, the ith, iu order of entry, beginning with the rein:anent
causes.
Adjournment day, Monday, June 26. The last night for entering causes
wIU he Friday, June =.

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS.—To-Tdoa Row, AT Hate-easy Ntsit.
Third Sitting in Trinity Term, ie26.--Aliddlesex Common Juries.
I
Kerslake v. Robson' Day, gent. T. Hall and Doe v. Pannell and
Webber v. Nkbolas another others
Pye v. Van Eyndhoven Bearcroft v. liens and Bernaseonl and another
and another others v. Ebers
Hodges v. Read I Bartlett v. Cater I Davis v. Pearlman
Lord Sydney and anor. Same v. Read
v. Roved
COURT OF EXCHEQUER.—Torts Day, AT Tex.
Jackson T. Bourne, pt. Clarke v. Hudson Carruthers v. Douglas
beard Stephenson v. Tomlin- Desforges v. Jones
Willis v. Stone YOU

COURT OF ADMIRALTY.—Tats D4r, AT Ti,.
Third Semlon In Trinity Term, 1816.—Before Lord Stowell.

COURT OF PREROGATIVE.—To-3toaanw, AT Tvm.
Third Stanton In Trinity Term, In26.—Before Sir John Nichol.
Butt v. Mullett and Gould f Warde v. Ward.

LAW INTELLIGENCE.

COURT OF CHANCERY, MONDAY, Juxz 5.

ARRANGEMENT OF BUSINESS.

The LORD CHANCELLOR, on taking his seat this morning,
addressed himself to Mr. Ilart, and asked whether, with respect to
motions, it would not be advisable that the Court should try, as an
experiment, the taking them according to their dates, leaving in.
junction motions to their fate, as the best means of getting rid of
the business.

Mr. !Lure said, that as his Lordship had done him the honour
to refer personally to him, he would say that he thought the pro-
posed plan the best that could be adopted, as it would have the
effect of extinguishing a great number of injunction motions.
The LORD CHANCELLOR wished it to be understood that he
woubl take motions in the order of their dates, and that he would
not allow any infringement of that regulation. It injunctions were
required, the parties might go elsewhere for them if they pleased,
and, from the number of (how to which of late he had had to affix
the
.great seal, he did not intagine there was much objection so
to do.
111 r. HART could not but observe, that every attention was paid
to the hearing and disposing of motions in the place alluded to.
At the same time, if Counsel did nut see reason to be satisfied with
the judgment so obtained, they of course felt no difficulty in taking
the opinion of his Lordship.
The LORD CHANCELLOR said that there certainly could be
no difficulty in reviewing such decisions, and he was only sorry that
there was not an appeal from his own judgment. There was one
circumstance which he hardly dared mention, which was, could not
'dater two be devoted to taking motions between the ending of
the Term and the First Seal ?

Mr. HORN E apprehended that considerable difficulty would be
felt by the Bar, inasmuch as at that period they had to attend the
Master of the Rolls.

The Loa° CLIANCELLOR observed, that he should be glad to
surrender his own convenience to any arrangement that could be
made for the convenience of the Bar, and the parties.
Mr. HORNE observed, that the sittings btfore the Master of the
Rolls. w which he bad alluded, were morning sittings, and were
much more important than those which took place in the evening,
from the quantity of business that was done; and he thought there
would be found considerable difficulty in attending both his Lord-
ship and the Rolls.
The I.OIID CIIANCELLOII wished that the Counsel would make
some arrangement among themselves on the subject of getting rid
of the business.
Mr. HART said that he did not attend the Master of the Rolls,
and It would be no inconvenience to him to attend his Lordship,
and therefore the observation referred rather to other Gentlemen at
the Bar than to him.
. . . . .

• Mr. Honsrz felt that the difficulty would be in attending the
Master of the Rolls at his Court. and his Lordship in Lincoln's-
ian-Hall. If the Master of the Rolls would sit in the Vice-Chan-
cellos's Court, it might be accomplished.
The Loan CHANCELLOR said he would speak to his Honour.
Mr. HART was confident that good would result from the pro-
posed arrangement.
Here the conversation ceased, and the Court proceeded with
business of no public interest.

COURT OF KING'S BENCH, MONDAY, JUNE 5.