The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser.
London, England, 1821-03-01 00:00:00

Cheaseery,t4Fat
emetiaa Ole Potter of yattaMaya...lllle barl sopped the pro.
2senlirrt Wt Cowl fat jit respect so doe dittsilY a 'hair
Thee erne o Polities preseahrd by we of the
ratio to that Wow, that she question ark* be derided
by a Ceasurittee all'irirOgrees. He aseatiealdl Ibis fee the
rupee et ealberlignar illsrdeblpe ialteetias In it, an it
was *OM lot I. beekelded, aeit catty U. it
ilbeted the el At related I* she slitgaitiee sad
raritie 0 s thesr,
,lieribeskt °WO for an
i=as
reamit.ill ;houpiapin
ArlimaratEL
'-t:_/ •tteir.i.labr.sai.; ./
Issauncv IN.

lion froi the
t►e Catholic

the Ckry of

dame of Exeter...—Ordered t.
Me. R. FITZGIBBON permuted • ietiticto from the Cs-
Molies of the County of the City of Limerick. praying to be
admitted to the fall participation of constitutional rights.
Mr. SPRING RICE supported the Petah'''. it was no
lustier a question of etpedieacy, if hither! esperlimey could
ever he separated front Ibe right, but priestlier. He, for
one, was ready to agree to the appointment of a Committee,
such as be understood WAS now about In he moved far, be.
cause be thought that the 'delimitate of she Claims of the
Catholics would establish on the Mutest basis the security
of the Prutestaut interest.
The Petition was ordered M be printed.
Mr. WILDMAN pretested a Petition from the Borough
of Cerkberter, anvil the Catholic Claiess.—Orderid to be
rioted.
Lord R. MANNERS pretreated • similar Petition from
certain Fretieilders of the Comely of Leicester.
Mr. CA LCRA PT begged to ask the Noble Lord, ',brayer
this Petition had beer adopted at any public meeting, and
how such meeting had been totavened
Lord IL MANNERS mid, be did mot know whether it
had been agreed tattoo at any electing. It had been for-
warded to him before she present year.
Mr. CALCRA FT said, Him he understood the Noble
Lord to say that he did not know whether any site. sing had
or hail sot been held fur the pavpa.e of sewing to the
Petitioa, but that it bail bees deltvereil to she Noble Lord
lase year, though he only now brought it foreard.—(Loryta.
ter. cad Ilear, kenr.)
Ordered to be printed.
Mr. NOLAN presented a similar Petition fruni the Town
of Nui4iiighasn.
Sir E. HARVEY presented a similar Petition from the
Clergy of the Archdeuemsey of Colchester.
Sic JAMES MACKINTOSH said, he observed these Pe-
titioners prayed that *ow of the ',curtsies elßalallialreri at the
eleelopue Revolution asight he removed. He was oat aware
of aim intention to propose the removal of any of she seen.
'sties of she Revolution of HAS. Ile tattered he ettubl un-
dertske to se, that his Right Ihromirable F. Mod (Mr. Plun-
kett), would at re, commit to she removal of nay of the se-
rarities obtained by that event; but he farther believed,
that, like V former Right II ...... arable Friuli., of his, be did
Hat colifuto:r: the lir volution of 16115, with all that was dorm
at that period, most particularly isi Is rlantl.—( Ilene, Lear)
—lie was glad to 6..61 asnoug Site Calh.lics a growing COSl-
flikace in Ma 'intl.'s) and jnaliee of Parliament, and he
trusted that the rcailli of this oriehi's tom ovoid rename
all necessity fir soy forth., Petitions ors the sulsjem; but
should it fail, be hope II the Catholics would persevere in
ibeir effort., mid be was emitidesit the day lOU out far
armed ales Its. it claims most be conceded.

- -
Ordered to be priwatol.
sir THOMAS B. LETHBRIDGE prruealed • Tetiliau
/role the wars of Rectum, in Sneterveeirlsir., •13.1,101 •"Y
further tont...onion In the Catholics. Thev relied on the tent-
-411 of Piolianrent tint to grant any farther c....creeiros,
'o"ltent come rffretull security f..r the P.otretant E•ta-
bliehistent ; bat ilny tkutitrei the po.oil.ilily 01. dc"i"Z any
I",•%tore h ffor.l ruitief..rtnle rein( In OW Ca.
li".tir• and ilt.• .71111 e tome prat itle 6.1 the eeetorily of the
kelition. Ile now.' tur.l.4llv coitruirril in the
1:114/6:nali " l'elitiout re ; and if it were itte wit ration of
be Nleini•er fur the liaiver.ity of 1).41.1ita to
aware fur a conninit.e, with a vim to the propped of any
1.1.114'11km. he enis4l not Intl think it a mere tlettn.ion, for ha
Lace nut how any 101 :..rare that would satiety a 'gad Ca-
cuuld be coo..lSil lit With the PlllBll7 of Ibe
I:stabkhell wrre the rewins which hid
mcliuctl Item far so neon} II! ht. hid
b"11
i"

to meet tis isdigemserod sock Prtitious Wog presented to
it. pie Hororr•bla Member proceeded to observe, that if
allegaduals d t►e Petitioners bad bees only illiberal, I
aboard, and woetwirtiso, be would have posed them tonne-
' 'Wed; hot there were irsesey of these which were grossly
false ; nod eistressgh he eras is charity disposed to give them
• large credit fee iguoraece, be mold out Wove that they
were not aware of their falsehood. They asserted that Ca•
1160111 A admitted of guestsl reservation; sow he would put
it to the Moose whether the Peiltiosers world be igaurant of
the repeated disellaiuseirs of the Catholics of soy such tenets.
The Hoc Member was proceeding to rder to docuesesetary
revidesee on this point, wire
The lIPS4ILER reminded him that it wee not strictly is
order to commeat spoil • former Petition', wises amber
Petitior was Were the House.
- Anson.' /nether ohoervat inure from Sir T. S. Lethbridge,
Mr. Warm, Mr. *wham, sad Mr. Legh Keck the regime
was reedimad ordered to be petaled.
Oa the modem of Mr. CA LCRA FT, the seder for !shin
into coesiderathot the Petitio• against the return few Aid-
Wereagt, ou the ISt% Mardi, was discharged.
she H. PARN ELL post poised, till Friday west, his motion
roppetin the knsiug of Tithes is *related.
ENGLISH ROMAN CATHOLICS.
Lord NUOSIIT rum IM isterent a Petition from r

numerous body of English Catholics. The
lion was signed by 8,000 persons of the
Catholic Church. Among the aignatui
those of seven Peers, foustren Baronet., at
of their Bishops, besides those 'of 'many
clergy end gritti ; and if le WOW
wrisk tsolit__litiostitP iliklove
ottalossbide ' wbfeeM prayed' 'Woe
Petitioners, those Mints were not founded
vein expectation of any material change likely .
have taken place in the opinions of the House, but
on the increased and increasing claims of the Peti-
tioners to consideration, awl to the tone and tenor
of the whole Petition. The oath of supremacy,
the House are aware, has hitherto been one great
difficulty in the rani of admitting the Roman
Cnthulics to a pirtienation of the privileges of
Blitivh subjects. The Petitioners state, that
they are accused of giving to a foreign Poteo-
tate part of that allegiance which is due to
their Sovereign. They have repeatedly denied the
charge—they agent dray it. They acknowledge
to their Sovereign the fullest and most trobounded
allegiance. In him alone they recognise the power
of the civil sword within the realm. They acknow-
ledge no foreign Po citrate to have the least power
within the realm, civil, spiritual, or ecclesiastical.
Hear, hear.)—There only now remains this
question then. Is it for religious tenets or politi-
cal diwbihties the Catholics are excluded ? If the
House reject the ;outer t.f the Petition, they must
be prepared to assert this, that no man is wor-
thy of the privileges of ciiizen who Mies,. in the
invocation of saints, its the spiritual power of the
Pope, or the real pr.sence, and that these opinions
are of such a dai'grrnua tendeocy, that it is neces-
sary to guard agaima them, by excluding one-fourth
of the moral strength of the nation. You hare
wet, she Roman Catholics firmly mid fondly at-
tached to their religion, how firmly surd fondly
their sufferings and persecutions for centuries can
best attest. They ask you to strengthen your own
religion, mid make it the instrument of their CHUM.
eipstion, and your own securny.—( Herm, hear.)—
The Noble Lord then referred to the monstrous
assertions of the Winnows °ate*, winch on all
hands are admitted should he swept away; yet
notssithstandistg the deltheiations of the Council of
Carnet ;nee, and notwitlistassiling the testimony of
every nation to Europe, in which Protestunts acid
Catholics are together tinder the same Clo-
ver 1111 l eist, still do these odious statures remain
on our books.—)Cries of Hear, hear, hear.)—
The oaths alpinist tratisubstaistiation be should say
were iinjost and calumnious; for it only concern-
ed snatteis of belief, and could out, thelefore, he •
fair subject of politic.il exclusion. With respect
to the oath of supremacy, he was authorised to soy,
that, as far us it contains any moral duty, they were
ready to comply : further than that they would not
go—further than that they had no right to go,—
He had some authorities of itreat weight to pro-
duce to the House on the subject. The first is
the unthority of a staunch advocate of civil liberty,
noel also the advocate of Protestardisin against
Pops ov—he meant Bishop Handley. He said he
could not justify the exclusion of Papists from
curd offices, except in the ease of open and avowed
hostility to die civil Government established in the
realm. Mr. Justice Blackstone was more explicit on
the subject. He said, that when the power of the
Pope giew weak in every country in Europe, then
would be the time to remove these restiictions.—
Hear, hear.)—The third was Archdeacon Paley.
He said, it should be remembered that the con-
I Inuit's) between Popery and Jacobinisin was the

of th. HL
and the Petres,
been depiirod (Hear, hear.)—He would conclude
with a passage from the Petition, for on language
could be more forcible. It was taken from the
preamble of the 19th of George 111. " That
British subjects of ull 41ellantiliaimbila were entitled
to the advantages of a five Constitution." Grant
them but this, and you give happiness to Ire-
land, and pence :Ad prosperity to England.—
(Load cheers.)
Lord GLENOICHT, in seconding the Petition,
would lint detain the House u the orestion
was about to be brought befogs their notice i 6 w
able a manner. lie should mend, tray, that if*
were a hardship that these disabilitiei should exi,t
in Ireleud the Catholics of Englaud cultured still
greater nitrations.
The Petition was then read.
Lord NUOENT observed, that there were only
now remaining four of the ancient baronies occu-
pied by those Barons who gained Mogan Charts
for England, and the representeteres digitise Barous
had signed tine Petition,—(llese, kssit,. hear.)
Ordered ' lie on the table.

reading.
which. al
his arrest said, he was taken before a military
tribunal of ufficeni, and ►tied by th..se laws *lnch
were laid down in a prochtmatio,► found on his per-
son, and sente►►ced by them to be shot. There
was no accredited agent of the British Govern-
ment l►reseut at the execution.
Sir ROBERT WILSON said, that the explanation
of the Noble Lord was satisfactory as far as it went,
but did not go far enough. Tha letter stated re-
ferred to a Council of War at Naples, but his ob-
servation related to a preview; Council, and the let-
ter of Sir William A'Court referred to the previous
Council of War.

Lord CASTLEREAGH observed, that he thouFht
the letter of Sir William A'Court quite sat►stac-
torP, and he could assure the Hon. and gallsisit
Off►►er that he did not think the suspicion had a
c.►lour of foundation.
IRISH CATHOLIC PETITIONS.

Mr. PLuNiirrrose to present a Petition from
a Very considerable body of his Majesty's Roams
Catholic subjects in Ireland. The ►ignatures to
the Petition amounted to souse thousands. Front
the means which he hull of acquiring accurate in-
formation on the subject, he was enabled to assure
the House that the Petition was a fair representa-
tion of the opinions of the Roman Catholics of Ire.
Isnd , and, coupled with the Petition which had been
presented on behalf of the same class of English sub-
jects, might be taken as an equally fair representa-
tion of the opinions of his Majesty's Roman Cut he-
lic subjects in every part of the empire. A similar
Petition had been presented to the Mouse its the
year before lust. It was unnece 0000 yto remind the
[louse that the Petition previewed by she late Mr.
Gr.ttan had been brought forward with all the
authority of wisdom and resistless power of elo.
quessce which. lent distinguished dist great and
much-hunented Inatt. It was out his design to take
up the time of the (louse by expressing the feel-
tugs of his heart upon his decease, nor to
mingle the public sorrow which followed him
to his grave with those observations which he
wes shout to submit to the I-louse. His
eulogium had Levu already pronounced in that
House by lips whose eloquent expression he would
not pretend to cope with, end due honour had beets
rendered to hisdepurtrd excellence. It was slot for
hi►n to disturb the solemnity of his obsequies. His
death, like his life, was a bond of connexion be-
tween the two countries. He (Mr. Thinker') was
desirous not to weaken the force of this eulogium,
which hail been given him by the expression of his
own feeble praise and unavailing sorrow. The sub-
ject comprises! in the Petition was one which had
lain nearest his heart—he had felt it most earnestly—
it lied taken entire possession of hiss mind, and
kept at► apparent interest in Isis thoughts to the end
of his time. 1n the last scene of Isis life he had
proved liis willingness to lay down his existence its
the defence of the right. sod libertiesof his country.
But deeply as he had felt interested in the defence
of those rights and liberties, and muds as he had
inclined to believe that among thetas was comprised a
relief from the disabilities described by the Petition•
err, he had never entertained that opinion without

;

Mr. PLUNILIITT 1111011 it row. Having discharged
the duty. which hod been put upon hiss, and which
conferred on him Inch honour, us the presenta-
tion of a Petition from so considerable and respect-
able a body as the Irish Roman Catholics must be
allowed to confer on ally Member of that Hume,
he had now to discharge another duty, by leading
the House to a consideration of 'loose laws and re-
gulations which peculiarly affected Roman
Catlss-
lrc subjects. Ile cleaned to be sinderstoodaa bring.
log the measure forward on behalf of the Legisla-
ture of the conutry, uud on behalf of the Protest-
ant population generally, as leas than la oefereneo:
to affording relirf to his Majesty's Catholic 'subjects.,
His purpose wos that of calling the attention of the
Howie to the relative situation of the Catholic-
body's..., situation which on one side was con-
sidered as justifying the severest measures, while
ors the other were heard assertions of injustice
sad ',presidia. which if persevered le" vest
likely to end degradingly
the and •

owl

very importance. though
ject which ought by no means to be overlooked.—
If it were supposed• that he intended to intro.
duce the measure as a palliative, to quiet existing
troubles, or to reduce existing disorders, discori-
teuts, or ill-will, his measure would be undervalued.
And as to fact, as to OUT distraction or troublesome
discontents, the Irish Roman Catholics had nobly
disentitled themselves to any imputation of turbu-
lence or disaffection. Determined as they were
never to abandon their claims to justice or the
wisdom of Parliament. they were also resolved pa-
tiently to await the decision of that wisdom, well
knowing that on no other principle could they rely
for the attainment of that justice. That the Irish
Catholics wen. anxious for a participation of all the
rights and privileges of the coustitutiou he would
he ashamed to deny ; that there might be some feel-
jog of discontent at delay, some sickness of opinion,
caused by hope too long deferred. it was nut his iii-
trillion to conceal. That any measure which he
might have the honour to propose to the House
would, when adopted, immediately allay all previ.
our ferment and settle all present discruitent, it was
far from his intention to aver ; neither his nor any
other measure which could by possibility be devised,
could at once settle opinions long agitated, or in-
stautly assuage habitual discontent. No such mea-
sure could be expected to operate as a charm. It
were as reasonable to suppose that because the tem-
pest had subsided, the waves ought or would imme-
diately cease to roll. But of one thing the House
must feel sure, that by doing justice they were pre-
paring the way for the establishment of lasting
,race. Their duty was simply in consider if in-
justice had beeo done, and if so, to statue for that
injustice—if grievances were partially and oppres-
sively felt, and if so, to remove them--if injunous
distinctioer had by accident or other circumstances
been introduced innotig the subjects of the empire,
and if so, to obviate them. If they found upon
full germination that injurious distinct had
crept in which were never intended—if they found
every class oppressed by partial injustice, which,
weighing unnecessarily upou the minds of the sof-
ferers,sunk into their hearts and imbittered their re-
flections, their duty would be to apply such reme-
dies as the State and Constitution approved to the
evil. But if they found that the sufferers made
up a very cui.siderable portion of the people
in one great branch of the empire, the tie.
cessity or promptitude in the application of
that remedy would be so much the greater. Before
he proceeded to the main discussion to which he
would invoke the attention of the House, he
wished to reply to an observation which had been
frequently offered in opposition to measures such
u that which he had to propose. It had been ob-
jected to plans of eniuncipuii 111 l , that all the mea-
sures for that purpose were imperfect.-thnt those
who had called mile attention of tile (louse to such
subjects, were slot agreed union themselves as to
the exact measure which ought to be adopted—
that the plan would in all probability be incousist-
ent with the attainment of the object sought, as
well as dangerous to the conatitutional interests ;
and that as there were many offices from which Ca-

count of the mode la 'bias it eat adesseed, actett(
unfelt ly. To such persons he used say, if we are
wrong is the principle, prove to as that we see
wrong; bet if you feel dist we are not wrong in the
Pripet*, what right can you here to meet us with ob-
jectifies ea to the detail of the measure ? If -you
think the detail objectionable, cense and as•
not us is adjusting it ; but do not oppose a (rind
tilde openly avowed, end one which you will oot
undertake to cootrovert by orgistelts, so resem-
bling the frond and rleatsgeoss of an nworlifig ene-
my. We come forwerd with no theoretic specula-
tioa—we offer no outried stuns, tie aurouched
peesciple—we cell spew you foe the restoration t,f
rights provided for as by the Cowertssioo itself. We
smog numerous body of bis Majesty's loy.l
, asking fir riehtsead liberties which were
for us by the blood of our anceptors.
t the question we propose to you fairly, and do
not oppose it on pretensions foooded in the detail
of a measure, to the principle of which you are
lIIIIIMIC fairly to object. What he - tbnut
was the -

were any person who entertamed such a wish.
he (Mr Plunkett) must decline all discussion
or argument with him. He himself had confi-
dence in it that there might be such a pion ;
and that confidence had been materially helped
and increased by the conduct of a majoiity of that
House, so persuaded of the probability of adjost..
iog the claims, that they had resolved to appoint a
Committee to inquire into the laws affecting I{3
man Catholics. A measure for their relief had b,:en
in the contemplation of the Committee, and at that
period, MI, had it not been fur the gross netts.
eretion of some of the members of the Catholic
body, it would have been carried into effect. At
that period the country was reeling to its centre,
being shaken by a tempest, the rudest that ever a
nation weathered. He could not believe that any
of Blade Gentlemen who had then given a vote in
favour of Roman Catholics would withhold it
Wow. It could not be forgotten by any greteitil
mind, that among the proud and distingui,beil
services which had brought the conflict to * con.
elusion. none were more divtiuguished than those
rendered by Roman Catholics. They had fought
the battles of the country. and shed their blood en
prodigally in defence of her liberties. that they
had shewis themselves well deserving to enjoy thine
lebertii.o. He was convinced that there could be
no hostility in any mind to a closer union with
Catholic subjects. All the adverse opinions might
he fairly styled prejudices ; and in using the terns
prejudice, he meant nothing like affront to the feel.
tugs of those who opposed the claims. If there were
prejudices, they originated in noble feelings which
had formerly grown out of greet and anxious stiugs-
gles which the country trail suffered in defence of
civil liberty. If these prejudices. derived so cre-
ditably from a jealousy on behalf of civil I;hertv,
did exist, they could only be slit eitudly reached by
the assault of reason; and. if properly attacked,
would certainly be removed. But autoag the .Ip-
. posers of the measure there must be a great anxiety
to adopt it, were it net for some supposed sense of
public duty which regraded their concurrence.—
It was impossible to doubt that the necessity of
complying with the claims was a growing ferlieg
both of the House and the cousitiy ; therefore
he was not likely to be opposed by any feeling of
opposition but that which arose from a very reason-
aide jealousy as to the security of the constitution
and the existing establishment. lie would proceed to
lay the ground/of his motion before the House. The
question resolved itself into three topics of CAttßi-,
deration—llse religious, the constitutional. and the
political. In discussing these subjects he feared
that lie would have to draw largely on their patience
and attention. The object was not tire of unknown
to any of the Member.; but some of them had
never heard it discussed within the walls of Parlia-
ment. Ills treatment of the subject must her. re-
ference, therefore, to the necessity of explanatioa
with respect to that portion of tlw (louse, and
therefore lie &well that he must trespass out their
time beyond those limits ulnae the well-known
character of the motion might seem to affix. First
then came the rel%lous

• . .
. • • ~,.. a..
. .
i .
i
( . •
. .' .. •' •
' • • . ..
-
• . . .
1 . ...
. .
• • • -f' .
' ‘;'..7 . ')" , • • - ,
. .
ovx.:* ~... :- )
...,,- ~ •
, -_ - t_..."‘•-• ,-' *2./
. _..
. .
• .'.a.p, * of ••• ••• io
' '44" ClP:4,gr'"irek*Lhe." t, , 14b.
,
• r4r
4. . . 1 7 ,IligyetIV4180110.1ii: is /rail , . • ~.. -4 4 • liii :5 .1 . 1 .
$
I t . ' I.: 4.6 74 V 1/1100 "SIM *4 ' ' .
. 0 ; 1111,
sii4 5 $
".... , I
... irt ~3iithlotisa Ist rtilierr h; -.- tt4et• •,- .
,
r;ifs.- /m 1 , ! I $
.. , -
Ile . sr . t•satrt slyer Oa sii"ba 4:tt...stOotwftu, ,- ;10;04109's
•:&i./0 •.,,, • , .4 i
14-1.1•1 ' tof se.* I ~t;itk 147 .1. • ..irbil• trrilt_lo,o
'..,... A *.7,•:.-:1,5 kt 4- *eguiat 0.... t ~
.-- -. :•‘„.
. 4.1 4 • . I . *.ais • - i.... re • ._ .
~. pit . , ~: %.',-,litetil Ilhwer WC .•ad •
.43.1 .
..,.. ntrati,l ri ftR, sisent,,y44oq vile Jam lt..ma he .• .e . .-....iie - •
sir!e. i: t •
. 'At' •"...i.eit nsen,it.iA) . , , -: lar t• . llmille. i i c •-, ) mile 4 '. WI ••11. .neupit4 '11'41! 1:t ' c'S 'sit '':'+Siktf.:ol.` 1
•
3 -,-o e •,:' '''''' ' ' • 1-•,•;f •:1- turd Jtsss irv.irsfl ' . -- . • .-, • ~• . i 5.,• I ' , eta set 41 s -et 4 . ~, ••. r- ' '14111! • .
_ . 1 .. . . - . . ...... , •
- - - - - ---- - .. -- .
-----. ---. • --i''' • -, - ------
. • . - •w,
r.
''.4-../.409 . tfl 's LONDON, THU '• • . MARCH 1, 18511. • else is 1
.v • v ott, I. , ... .L. - .. r • •
Tiernan' 5690. • .
• it. • .r. • , t:,.., 1 - Pate, ,
. ~...4,.....
.
• • . • . •k
..1 • ,
-1, iiIIIPARIAL P4MLIAMSNT. . .`
beery ass to oppose the claims of his Catholic ' sole •jostifleatiola i, . ; hence they. tip,: those qualificetigiesp which the constitubsu asr.__aaAall sof .tholi_es seem eggisig*,, ,'. .• . :; ..,..
~.,,_••••,,
...
.. Is
. . fellemmbjeets, continue sae I ''' some visible demised. He bad always considered it a meat millerist feetly Irwin •
'44 111.11, ....-.........1.1....-.-•-. ' . • .
Mr. GREHVELL said as
,he had been mearly twenty . , .
reedered them , • '' —4 Heftr, hear 1-00 . wart of the on' to determine what meutitiee the to which they WO* - ~ ir.
yi* . .
110111161144 Lamy, Winonstsoawl 1111111111fi.: ran a Hoehn, of that Homer, sod had invariably sop- „. . . . yi.j.g • . .., hilX , . , Viotti— . , , . . , ,
_
41 % I r '"' '• ' ' ed by bls vote the appals:snots, of tbe Catholics fur autnonttes then, with the lii•tory a coustitution or time Protestaut people might requiem wens of which it `mai •hs - ti'
Tbeirijemehipe we ~,i tee (kw,* ea, imp kipeedst. •••-t-i dies bet hod am lad am oeporimmity of &bards, his Cendnct of thi 11, I', I , holies theaspelves, be for the integrity of existing institution* its earansa there—sad finally. that thourielow.propired seder;
sake disesteems which hod take. place se eseteuded they w
wrmteis, Appellant ; eonsterii==,-u,,,,97 to tz, privileges. , conceding time Catholic claims. He teas. eUre he were least of all agreed as to the socseitles which
, .be 4141001 04 ibis accuelom publicly so declare They profeie thil •••Pur ' a 1 4'
nt disvinlable fame. the ream which attenda on virtuous setilleat ought to be deimateded or Ores for the protection
TIM arts so Appeal from ilie•• sad, ao far home amderetionsg the Cesulitti.. .• • is.., " i i
they be estemksl it was cheering to him while lie was on earth., But of the existing etnabliahatent. He de filed this
unman. Sristlenfl. lrell'' h°"w° f" iti..7glis . ad fthe • "Vance' and 4lat '
was cos eat, rum most allentsve exam aa. „„,
r The Alftrocf•Gellvosi wee hoard in ..rw•+.ll'l • ittt •°- • lisealfShe *abject, that a compliance with she prairie a on • bed of Politics . , r—(Hetep ailig.l if It. had that weekliess of great abode, 1)0 one foil node of meeting the subject as uncenclid, onalait-
hrtigesemt pootpemod. ~.;i in v .• Wm °Whalley would prove the greatest support to she Co.- Do not tell the :.,
.. 'ullsolies, tliiii you mote strongly than tutu detertatitid of thst bellow lye end unjust. The querion was, if the subject ..
caws& G 01.0.011011. 3841. A ppellost ; 44111,011.1. MOO* 11". wa.a""laßtirinbr. eke best
ieiabeir ;rota
8....,..t04 she to :".!Ter ial:ribtthetilrieerusitcici;xity'let faith; do not in- and heartless, popularity which 4" to be got by die were fit to be enterionied by the Haste*, was it un- , 1
Hespoodeat. . .
~
_. : 11* relics; du not insult ion of consistency, and Could only be retained W., constitutional in its object ? or was it jolt tun'
This west ail Appeal from the decisios of the F• 8•401,• Meir Ira" opposed "ie.. "Ai." o.r the Calltwijors, wee he their- bumble bue.4.• :`: 'Alai : du not later- Weaustent dereliction from principle. Conscious proper for tlx deliberation hf Parliament t If it
renewed Ins upposenos fat fraties. He wished the •Kt • • --4 Chsacery, !reload. the 1 1.0„,, ee &mem, „,„ the ,iiussion ,s *web -they ~,,e fare with their anetut , . boor prevent them .f his comparative inability, be (Mr. PlunkeSip..• mace unfit for the considerations( Parlimosaia-if the
' Pr. Agar met Mfr. Rhaftwell were heardfor - 1
Ord Mr. Wedowee sod Mr. Lows( foe mks ResPo I, • v•-• •• OPIISSe• 1* time yaw Den a measure was proposed foe open. from worshipping yr._ r
.• : accenting to dim, pressed his design to fallow the hook-pi of legeletr. object sought were uncomtitutiesiel-..4lllo.4isabilitiet .• -.--
, No'. , metals ism la the essay sad navy to the Catholies ; dictates of tgele . , '` ,—(Lee eeeers.)— parted friend. Actuated by the ounte..apillisa and exclusions oomplvassed of tfaitriutifitsily just '
1
Jorlassem ppaposed. . ,
it, ~... wearlirt 114 lasetes, and lie hellish cry of il N• if the 4 4 •
Catholics -did ~ tr • their as using thus& kgitte winch his Oir. Cepottaat's). and necessary for the prutectieu rof the tosattio- - - •
IRS ZAST lIIDIA COMPAIT, los beer totroessfully forged, ilss proposal nes. • .. . ,-. .
• erre seven, itesposoilieL . • at sloe, iheu an that was weiths by that me,. .pcsgsslitly SO they I.' wimp • • ' •Melscp lied bequeathed, he intended to pit lion. thew the subject•lnvald-be trawnissed
, ..
Rim smarom,Hyonsi deem era sliddsesallr Alt MA t/. ' , bin berm emeeded. A Balt to that effeet was Irroug: ‘ did Oa I.IOIWOMI4f, Ka T - ream, - u not measures which he hetlieuseued iu pi friss, Omsk e,tinstielk- 1404 were
_._.. ...
.- . . . i- ..1; . -•-• 4111 Weems el' Let*, I. tlll3, by -s Ilibsitlbse-ite itooll is oes?c,Atig stli+st i; tiro, hi if yes dos CArlholia Ofitliff.anitjaCha He Imiliwit emmesterit with 'tlie at the '--... • •
eis m 05716.8911 IN fall.lie the itiN ',pit sad itavas psseetitintrib tbo Coaslestos, la- Sole "TOO reduce yourselveito time (level of these for whom up tlse•Pelittori. .1.. i ' Constitution and the claims of justice; t it wa.,,
.
~------ ' • ' - . .. ,
...- sleeedortio• l• coosnls••e• sUllut Bill " you legislate; do not consult Catholic floarda, but Mr. D. BROWNS, just. seconded the mallo• as he bail before termed it, neither just, tsar molly, - . • - 1
'dor• v i• Admiral might
bymrd the Chemmel em, and consult
1.1.6.
ilaillgefletroikh was twos`.
- oth
tss mixt,* be hod them, their
adisinion to your own atithority ; and if there be soma The Petition was brought up aest MOW very nor catidid, hee hottest, tO meet the proposition lty • I
Asellata. • ,- . l 3 4 • i .j, '". . wish* it bad pfeviossly het!. foretailt, world lead to the who, ill the struggle for their tights, have acted ra- distinctly. Some of the passages iu itugretwartaly any argunseitis founded on the probable detail rof • . ,
--....-•••••••-•."..4
Me. spine,, IlisspisillkAuseebt up is Imo- eeeeltroe of the Coeattiotioa. Tice moult. of slat met- *her too intemperately.", Jet out that act agrinst the cheered by the House. ob. measure to be proposed. One thing -Ise-her,
noun; of the ea ett Illagpl'Arfaialelef7ll,lll9 sum; ISO wiateaded, had bens say thing but dangerous and great body of the Catholic.. Stich a sYsieln is not Mr. PLuswerr prevented other Petitions from hewed no person would deny. that the question was • -.. 1. ,I
to /smeary 1110.—Rn.1 sod i•lamifif4.l4 c.. he diurgra with i^c"giateetY shim wile haviel 6"1"4/ wiadotn, isnot justice is not truth.—(Hemr,/settr.)— tlx Catholic Perishioners of Si.'Andrew's. St. of vital importance to the country ; sail if it Isere' ' • - .
Tan actrox n,.* grit•Tsawits, ~- opposed il, bed afterwards acquiesced its it, tom came for. 1 A
Judge yore countrymen by their own acts, restore Mark's, St. Asia's, sod St. Peter'., Dublin; sod admitted that the granting of the claims might
The LORD NtELLOR•oMiI be rose irelblpitra ward to oppose the
.Catbolie clams upon the. ease grumuits. ,
Mr. SA RH A M disapproved of these Petition'. A Pets, ioa peace *lid concord toirelund, and restore to England of the calamity and city of Waterford. do no harm. it was far more certain that it •
poet aliefervislisf heir Lordship' that two - were
tooser.ehrid
...itch, the ease or Eke purl • lNiMmore. had *seal presets... ied. from the Clevyy of Leicester, which the services of' the flowards, the Arundells, the The Petition. were all ordered to be printed. would do a great deal of good.-.(Ileor, heor.)--i ... - -..• •. . •
I. do aidrtet Clisseery.44Ffit the elitassolosees of the 1/""4" wit. sallellsll. sod he thought the Homo °eche Clifford., and the Petrel, of which she has lung CATHOLIC CLALVIS. •r. -• • .
Those who opposed the principle merely on ire- ..,.,
-. ..... . _ -___,_, ta- a-A ....---..4 a.- to murk Ito lionroollopo at such ibtitiotte Wee tweetated to 1...,...„ A.:,...;,.,:„1 - /I.2___ L___ , LB_ __..5,i „.,..„,„1...1„ a.- Ir II- • • • J• ,-__-_.2 ans..l ..f •1... ....-1...)....1.1.;,..4. L. ..... .rimoskeuml met •A . .. , .‘.

1101.161 OP>XlOl/113, Waiameisav, ISastsllllolll.
"1- -
lie ORR* d s ptete liereveleare **deck OR to
sfeertobiske mos etrospletehr Sped.
7lse SPEAK boob Hie Choir al a groorlor
Tire sew *ohm beak tit. oaths sad their
The Comity ZINK Nap ciael Pin was reaß veto' ad
Ir. wit comerieritted. • • ••••• • " 'vs • "
Me. dolmen. fweßVzglitglllles 11er.
ed a
•.• , -
141.4 r .
1:11110. CaMiE "mat Preilleee trees boll-
toisigy • iiisr, eispialehog et evi-
460eval la
Abate & * * • • •
• fair.C.4io4oAS priesetiA. a ahrilar Rasa tie
lleeberg. Is the Resell .et links, sod ea-
'..r."1"91" ' • iliarodlors la the pryokilly of Newberg.
„Plosiftllsd 11 Is4el4pr Petidee *en the
040 sad 1.6 Gal LaeußeMers the
r • . - • •
4111118411IreelliNSPI.
ita *ARV T presented three Petitioss, of the
oillore, from the Comity of Essex.
M A BER LY pretested a like Petition from the
Cathay of Northampton.
These Petitions were severally ordered to be printed.
CATHOLIC CLAIMS.
Mr. P. WODEHOUSE presentrd a Petition frowi the
Okay of the Diocese of Norwich, against the Catholic
A similar Petition was also periled from the Ckrgy of
the Diocese of Exeter..—Ordered to be orbited.
ay. ve crrwat ovular . (. Ike Cs-

.
m from • had signed' this Petition.—(lfeer, *eat, km 4 iO-tlie &mac— --tcr 1;.„-c7-1,-doots—iviti of ilsolburpillam.... smolt fairly to objecl. What he was sh‘titt to
he Peti- Ordered to lie on the table. .. Hi„bjaci a„ to pat as sad ta. tramangons.ang propose, was the appointment of a Committee to
e Roman MORAY. distraction, by doing ms set if jodisq. He pee, adjust that detail and give the safest effect to the
urea were Lord Coret,sauaou took this opportunity of cwwied wpm • weiszeserrujimil • „doll proseiple. No sine who heard his would be die-
and seven answering a %Aleutian that had been put by an justiogo ono Aso% that imolai to soy. tart no plan
**adjust
be adopted by
rof their Hon. and lant Member (Sir It. Wilson o% • tin, 4• ji casia.A...g.cadevil • - A
I forward former ' re tin tkitiztipt.iist -- of. justice. .11*-:' Obi* Mss. or iboetho Alaimo could nova; be so modified 1
• fer4bistairerliiii- at thle period,t- awl had to propose would be met with • groat degree us to render it safe and proper to grant them. No
rby the (mid a letter. from Sir Wm. A'Cours, which he of satisfaction, and with warm reeling, of grafis man could Celli that there were no such plan, or
d on any would take the liberty of reeding. The Noble hide. This latter consideration, howevet, he con. that the obstacles to adjustment might prove
likely to Lord then rend the letter, which, after describin
g aidered of very inferior importance, though a sob- on examination to be insuperable. If there

question, Lyon Whicii he