The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser.
London, England, 1825-02-16 00:00:00

tett 'Wiwi WINO
▪ pee4tebeelt lea
eetaby's
ed WIN IWO
bwe dun were two.
Atiaddietithe bed
poidetel
seam AC=
ei the poseest Add.
I did.' Ine.•••
rag e_.2llllse_
eye—
et idiom

Mt
segisita7 ,

don, he must say he
for tie
tie`
rivebl tor
Sad
only
pishe o
ras only t!se Aisietre
•
tubye
beta
tto miss ua Qtt &Of
It did. It bed been
else, was a Use.
t moment,
he disposodPitrellital
be maid to
passioes of its ioha.
and all nests were
e tide of prosperity
kingdom, he was die.
e one chosen to pro.
.ne, the necessity of
oppression, against
*se at such an occur.
select this particular
*ty for the recommit.
table the Chemed.,
timed upon a defence
to defend what no
not easy to discover
The case the Right
• to mike out against
a moment—it had
receivad a sufficient
rt friends had helped
.ber for Clare (Mr.
for the full ex.
ntiments, had actu.
the Honourable Sc..
lie had mentioned a
• gh the means of the
ir agent In the prose-
ted commendation of
t likely to be rendered
°tics ; they would be
e and general alum-
individual were to hi-
ed in passing through
degree of credulity
sary to investigate
the prejudice that ex.
In like manner many
• ut it might be as well
ere true, they should
my to refute them ;
test of a public loves.
y to prove the honesty
in thus submitting to
hitherto formed the
hat would the Orange
'ate them as the Also-
word, the beat way to
uld be by holding out
Claims. Many Gon.
your of those claims,
t Rill. The Right
had declared himself
• and of its mischievous
tiered it as an incubus
tit down. What was
? Were the shades of
.ourable Secretary so
.1 really immersed
pose that the Catho-
the Catholic cause,
ut, if lie had v_ a
rA to be hoped tht.
bject ; for he had stated
he Association and the
to be exercised by that
overnment in spite of
nee a disgrace to the
rernment appeared to
• wer paramount to its
'a Ministers entitled to
r opinions on the sub.
any documentary eri.
among themselves in
House that the present
but Ergland, and the
be unconstitutional in
al in England. Rut
-• Association was rot

. .
borne in mind there
and the material one,
another question had
Leen legal ? but he
of consideration, for a
, and vice Verla. He
illegal nature, and that
of the Irish Attorney.
pted to fasten upon in.
al character, but had
peal, and ignored the
This was a proof the
of any existing law.
lion to say that the
nding the cane before
effeczual contradiction,
ut the Honourable and

..n liberty was content-
fine the people. but he
prevent them from ex.
meddle with their free-
could not understand
Member's sophistry,
step against genuine
glits of the subjects of
, thee piece of inform*.
House that the mea-
•ed it would prove so,
on to the execution of
sounder discretion and
the country, it would
the House, if passed,
' e hoped and trusted
land would use
as' ould be likely to
Ireland had eulogised
, and, he believed,
be reconciled with the
who held another
t be permitted to call
is of these gentlemen
the Honourable and
acelievery a n idence in
t. No authority ex-
, e attention, or could
g experience of the
have it in his power
e must know what
usinted with all the
( Mr. Plunkett) had
ct of the Roman Ca-
lle (Sir Francis) was
Gentleman credit for
ing forward with his
inclined to admit his
his advocacy of the
a doubt on the sub-
.uld pardon the exist-
ed how he himself had
league (Mr. Canning)
a doubt, he repeated,
of the Hon. Member.
disposed to concur
his determination to
apprehended Its et.
ymen. He confessed
ncl, and the possible
more statesmanlike
-(leneral for Ireland.
nee and infatuatlee
shorn of one of the
.ire legislation ; forts
which could befal cliff
the lopping off of that
dtiplored—tarnisliiryi
iories of the county!.
iced--of all the ern
lation, from -lookirit
ad befallen this coin•
eider the loss of Ire.
11 as a feather in tat
cell to the recollec
nd en historical fact
stances. When the
ye in the recollection
.g with the Fidurate
ing nation under the
and been subdued
to deprecate thei
Id to inflicted on