The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser.
London, England, 1807-04-22 00:00:00

. i~ - ..

lIIPERIAL P4RLIAMEN't

I.

,

tItrUSE OF Loltai—fursoar, Arso. 21..
-
Id the Scotch Appeal Cause. the Earl of Gallo-
way v. isl.Hict.iuson. Mr. Alexander was heard rt
some length for the Respondent. and the Deelee of
the Court of Session was affirmed.
&tuNTE viuw.
The Earl of MOI al A rose, and observed. that an
idea had gone abroad. ak to the expedition which
captured the important fortress Monte Video,
that a sufficient qtiontrry of powder and ammunition
had not been seapplied for the the or the troops. In
cider to ceirreft this rumour, he proposed to more
fora return of the supply ; from which it wculd ap-
pear, that the pri.piirtion was greater than that
torn:shed to expeditions emploTed• par-
ticuiaily to the Cape of Good Hope. The Noble
Lail conducted by moving "An Address to His
Al .j -sty. fora retUr .1 (al the proportion of ammu-
att ion supplied wife) the Artirlery used in the exprdi-
ti commanded by Sis Samuel Atr:hanity, sue-
e••vi.ig the greater or less quantity, iu proportion to
the tsutnSes trni-i„ss."
fate Ear) of GALLOWAY said, that in men.
tioauag the tusulliesency of au; pay, he had not oh.
tamed the entorrnation from indireft means. but had
ithrred it horn the public disnat-7h ct the Naval
Commander. Ttie Ntlhle E4ll VI lira) had itated
the supply to he :Is great in proportion as that for
the C spe. He observ..d, hcheever, that those sell
decrieJ the measutes of the Government preceding
thd I..st, were eery apt to impute blame where it
afd not rest. In the preicit iiistanze, taking it for
grams.' that the divatch of tile Naval Commander
wa. curry& it would. bd fotit.d perhaps that blame
was imply able in other giant rs. There was a wide
diffetence between a regtear siege, and the dirtily
01 a piace-which was obstinately defended.
Zia Sr'ENCER condemned the prafltee of dis.
cursing a question, when the merits were not be-
fore the H •tire. He denied that either himself er
Lis Noble nirnd, with whom he riled, upon any
occ je F=4 the measures of their p:edecesso:o.
After some further conversation between the
E irls of Galiews7, Spencer. Radnor, and Moira.
and Lord HollauJ, the original Addrezr was Wit
arid earlied.
Me. Famves, Mr. Mellish, an I some •other
Members, In 'tight up several private Rills Iron the
Ci im mains, whit h went through their diffneut stages.
Upon the mild reading of the Ttea.ther of toe
ICa Regulat ion Bill.
The Earl of RA DNO nhjefled to th. further
procs:diii,g. and wished at to oe amended in borne
pas octane paiois.
• Tate Ea.!! a t LAUDERDA LE thought it wou:d
to name der..t °us, had leis Majesty's Ministers been
resent at the discussion of a ilLi n 1 such great im-
pertani.e. In their alp:end-, towever, he conceived
tbe irdst wait would he to proceed with the Rill.
The LORD CHANCELLOR toought the Bill
/Aid not go far ervisii;h ; 'oat night be remedied by
ss Supplemental BM.
Lind i lOLLAN:) (1110111:1t the Bill dil not lc.
eiatilligly so pINIVid.: to; the public security ; and
also deprecated t: a :Owner of Ministers, up sit a
sahjt.ft ro peculiarly afteAlaic a part of the Govern.
taco.
After some observations by the Earl of ROSS-
!. \ N and other Lords, the Lill w.i, lead a third
time and passed.
The Innkeepers' Allowance Bill, and the Assets
Ball, were severally teal a bust time.
Adjidurned till to-mor low.

,