The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser.
London, England, 1826-02-14 00:00:00

LAW NOTICES•

COURT OP KIN()'S BENCH.
MIDDLESLX COMMON JURIES Till DAY (TUESDAY, 14,) AT

Beek v El!ham
Churchill • thole
Daimon • 11'hittaker
Broome v Winter
Shaw a S.J.Copeland
The King vll.Brand
Butterworth v Ito-

ital.r..ewsr Nom
Hewlett v Raihon Ilansard r Baines
Croswell v Bromley Fesm v Same
Hamilton v Radford Doe, &e. • Caßattan
Civiall v Beiltonl Cooper v Brown
Molds v Broadfoor Cowper • Jones
Hall • Burgess Doe, &c. • Mills
Miller v Osborne 'toe v Stumner
Doe, &c. v Moors Skilinan v Punter
Doe,&e.v Thompson I Slum v Same
Baron v Junes, v Soothes
Penn v ',ewer liolgate • Sowter
Colvin v Ilenson Dawson v (lorry

thoram
Cowell Vellowley
Graltain v Splatt
Doe. v Rowe
Jarmaln v Afar
Grintield v Lomas
The Lord Chief Justice will attend r.t Guildhall to-morrow
'naming to adjouto the Sittings, and afterwards go to Itlidilesex
for the tri..l of Causes. 4:

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS.
MIDDLESEX COMMON JURIES 11115 DAY AT lIALT•PAST

Doe v Dyball
thalson,gentv Lewis

NINE.
IMMANENT.
Whitmarsh & others
v Oke and another
Felton v
NEW CAUSES.
Davies • Struthers ,
Harris • Creswell
Chambers • H. %Vit.
SOn
JURIES APPOINTED
Cotsworth • Shoults
and another
Simpson v Lord
NEW CAUSES.
Daniels Rowley I Kinnard • Roberts
Spencer v Blake Outwit and another
%Williams, gent. v • Jones
Goodwin the elder hoes anti another v
131 ay v Reever, &c. Austin and others
To sit at a quarter past nine each day. Causes must be entered
and Records passel two days at least before the adjournment day.

(literati viguektliorpe
l'ibel v Meredith
v Garrott

Ashby and another v
Voy
A ckely • Martin
Itscon • Chambers
LONDON COMMON
Tittord • JOseph
Teller 'Atkinson and
another

Chambers v W.Wil-
son
Chiciley v Bull

TOR TO•31011110W.
Collins. gent. v Han-
cock
Curwen v Ballard •

Jackson ♦ Ileale and
others

COURT OF EXCHEQUER.
crwrows CAUSES TIIIS DAY, TO SIT AT TEX O'CLOCC.
The King r Philip Carlyon and TheKingv Thomas Thornarand
another I another
Same r George Jupp

- ..
SPECIAL JURIES..
I The King v Wm. Stephens At—lien. v Charles Cuff
At..fien. r Samucl Adams and Sanie r John Stephenson
others

COSIZION JURIIS.
At..Oen. Robert Farwell I AL-kien. •J. Bingham

COTTON TRADE.

( From the Charleston Courier of Jan. 21.)
The Martha snow, —, cleared at Savannah for Liverpool on the
12th Jan.

The Pleiades, —r, cleared at Philadelphia for Buenos Ayres.
on the Ilth Jan.

The Florian, Harman, cleared at Charleston for Liverpool 21st
Jarunry.
Cut: new. JAW. I7.—Since our last there has been considerable
rain, which has kept up a good boatable river. Three steam-boats
have arrived with full freighot, and our streets begin to appear
more lively. Cotton is coming freely, and selling brisk at 124
cents, a 12A rents.
[From the Charrerton Courier of Jan. 23.1
COTTOW.—No sales making in the liner descriptions of Sea
Islands; the stork of this hind is the market is now supposed ta
amount to KO bales. 31aines and Santets are selling at our
quotations. The recent accounts from Europe have caused a re-
laxation in the purchase of Uplands : the principal sales through
the week have been at 12i cents. ScA' give the general quotation
of 124 a 13 cents: fancy brands are held a little above those
rates :
Sea Islands - 35 a 50 Maine and Saniees 32 a 35
Stained ditto . nominal Short Staple - 12} a 15
Rice is in good request ; prime ots will corrirrand 3dols 1.2. cents,
and the most favourite brands a shade higher.
Prime - 3i dollars
Inferior to good 2 a 3 dollars
Exports from Charleston during the week ending 21st January:.
Cotton.
Cpl
- 250 •
- 2499 -
- 575 -
. 170 -
- 112 .
. 279
- 2018

Sea Islands.

To London
Liverpool
Nonll.of Europe
Antwerp
Amster(Lam
Bremen
Ilavre
West Indies

- 99

-o .
o -
0-
0.
53

Rice.
. 0
. 447
592

- 1592
. 63
. KM

. 612

154 5903 3107
Cotton was selling at Fayetteville, 19th January, at from 11 to
11; cents, and at 31 il led ge will e, 17th January, at 10 and 11 cents.

LAW INTELLIGENCE.

COURT OF CHANCERY, MONDAY, Fes. 13.
7--
The LOUD CHANCELLOR this day resumed his sittings at
Lincoln's inn Hail. Hie Lordship came down at ten o'clock, and
having been assisted from his
_lyarriage, proceeded to his private
room, where he remained about hilt an hour. His Lordship ap.
peared to have suffered very severely from his late attack, and
walked lame, though by no means so much so as might have been
expected. His lordship took his seat on the bench shortly after
half.past ten o'clock, and proceeded to hear motions. That of the
tilamorganshire property occupied the most of the morning. ', e
are happy to say the affection in his Lordship's case seems to have
completely subsided. As soon as it was known his Lordship
had come down to the Hall, the respective Counsel and Solicitors
flocked into Court, which, by twelve o'clock, was completely
thronged. The recovery of his Lordship excited Very general
interest, but it was evident frequently in the course of the morning
that he was still suffering considerably. His Lordship appears much
thinner.

IN TIIE MATTER Or SIR GREGORY PAGE TURNER.
An application was made to know whether tt Wag his Lordship's
wish. that the inquisition or traverse in this matter should be tried
in Middlesex or in Bedfordshire.
_ . . .

Mr. TutsLovE appearing for Sir Gregory, instructed by Mr.
Corbett, said the minutes of the Court's order directed the trial to
be in Bedfordshire. and ell he now wished was, that the order should
be drawn up accnn:ling to the minutes.
Mr. SHADW E I. was inioruLted by Mr. Moberly to appear for
the family, and to contend it would be MOM convenient for all par.
tie,' Li have the trial in London. . . .

The LORD CHANCELLOR said it wait necessary that there should
be an end to this matter to some way or other. He felt certain when
the thing was before the Court previously, it wsa intended the trial
should be in Hetifonlshire, and whether the CORD would or would
not now order it fa be in London, would very much depend on
when It could be tried here ; therefore he desired to be informed,
at the next seal, how soon it could be tried in London.

nrattEssour. v. GLAMONGANStLIRE CANAL COMPANY.
A considerable portion of time was occupied upon the question,
whether the defendants should be at liberty to send engineers, on
'heir part, to inspect the plaintiff's works, before the trial of the
issues directed in this case, to enable them to give satisfactory evi-
dence brims the trial.
31r. fIORNE supported the motion. lie submitted that the
issues could not possibly he tried, in a manner to satisfy the con-
science of this Court without such an inspection.

Mr. HEALD, on the othe • side, argued that bad the plaintiff
bought en action of trespass against the defendant., instead of
coining here, and then going to law upon issues directed by this
Court. the defendants would nut have been at liberty to have de-
manded any such inspection ; and that, in analogy to the rights
of persons upon art action of trespass, this Court would not grant
that leave to the defendants, which might, in different ways, be
prejadieial to the plaintiff.
The LORD CHANCELLOR observed that if the parties chose to
bring an action of tretir.ass,and give up their remedy in this Court,the
Court could have no objection to such a course. If that course,
however, was taken, and an application to inspect the complain-
ant's works made and refused, the Common Law Judge would
be at liberty to state that tact to the Jury. But where an in-
junction had been granted, as p the present case, .his Lordship
held the practice to be, that the Court was at liberty to order
every thing likely to lead to a full and fair discussion of the ques-
tion in dispute.
Mr. HORNE then named half a dozen engineers and the de-
fendant's Solicitor, whom be thought ought to be at liberty to make
the inspection.
Blakemore objected to such a number of engineers.
The LORD CHANCELLOR thought three engineers quite
sufficient
_ _

Mr. filiskemore had not the slightest objection to three re.
spectable'englneen inspecting every corner of his works.
Mr. Iltinsrs: then named Mr. Nento, Mr. John Walker. and
Mr. Humphries, u the gentlemen they would select to make the
inspection.
The Lotto CHANCELT.OII dhected their names to be inserted
in the order :and told Mr. lilakentore, if he pleased he might bring
forward at the trial, to refute the evidence of those three, every
other engineer in the kingdom.

VICE.CLIANCELLOWS I'OUILT, MONDAY, Fes. 13.

BRITISH LI4AIMS ON THE FRENCH GOVERNMENT,

The l'i
wee a bill

pointed for
Government

to a certain
in France.
Fanning. w
i• France.

Government.
eroded to tfr-

RILL v. REARDON AND °VIERS. ranee
-tcr.Ciraxcv.t.i.ua gave judgment on this case. This
I tiled by the plaintiff' against the Commissioners ap.
tw regulating the claims of British subjects on the French ll'e I
eat said ethers. The *inlet Hill claims to be entitled lent in
in compensation awarded by the Cotinnissron for property a aeon
e. which. his wife claims as the representative of a Mrs. other
wiri had forenetly considerable real and mo►able property in the
pr.prrty ate had possessed in common ♦itb ber more S
till the year 1792, whint it was confiscated by the French suffere(
mt. The bill insists that the plAinlifr. Mac al; is 3s. per
o the moiety of the compeasatiou awarded to the delinarlaor not can