The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser.
London, England, 1825-11-08 00:00:00

riTzGin:

The SOLICITOSI-GENERA,
which from its nature he hoped
heard in_private.
Mr. lIAIIT.—There never .4
more necessary should be heard
Mr. SOLICITOR-GENERAL.—
finds out that there are some cases
Mr. Han T.—We don't want to
but it' they throw dirt on themsels
them from it.
The Soucy'. on-GENinAr
petition was in the names of II
infants; and its prayer was to
drawn front the care of their nit
custody of their legal parents. 7
they were the produce of an ii
gibbon and Mrs. Moore, when 4
their legal parent, who now threat
tody of their natural parents, for t
sentment against the parents by
fending children. I t was materia
in possession of the data connect
married Miss Fitzgibbon in '
Moore fell into an adulterous 1
year the infant Henry Moore
suspicion of this connection it
nothing was done until 1824,
Mrs. Moore lett her husband'.

The LORD CHANCELLOR.
whilst Atm. Moore remained ii

Mr. HART—AII, my Lord.
the husband, Matins Crosby hi
solving the marriage ; and in tt
vied Mrs. hloorc. From their
brought up and acknowledged
Fitzgibbon, and Diana his wi
natural father applied for the ct>
a writ of habeas corpus from th.
hlr. hloore had done, although
infants' natural parent, and actui
them up in obscurity, unedur
petition, in which it was praye
appointed guardians to the It
of the petition, there was the a.
a Nobleman and a Clergyman.
the 21st December last, he had a I
Moore, at his place of Moore
(Ireland), relating to the infant
Moore, now Mrs. Fitzgibbon.
Henry Moore was not his child.
with a shilling. lie said he •
his ; his intention was first to ch..
pudiate it. lie further declared
Mr. Fitzgibbon and his wife, and
done to gratify his vengeance a
conclusion, deposed, that in hir
font Henry would not be safe
Moore. His Lordship had heard
with the boy ; but there was an
Low, of Dublin, which proved
towards the female child. He ash
that he would put her to a obit
marriageable, give her, with 1011
her. Such were the facts of Olt
nal) contended, that the prayer
on any just grounds; because,
as well as the legal parent of
right over them, when his I
were exactly the reverse?
fit, of his childree. His intendona
a PP tiori one which specially
Court, upon a principle, in i
up time in quoting precedent
infants, not for the purpose of
toe advantage of those childr
sentmeot against their parent
sentment may naturally exist
was for the Court to interfere.
helpless children.

• - Mr. HA sa RT id his Learned
pal so dear, that it was unneeesa
passion to him who was ignor
authorities. perhaps his Learn-
naming a few.
The Solicitor-General was about
crt.t.oa said—Whcre a third tv
children, the Court has interfered
children from the parents. Then •
Selwyn left a large sum of money
married in a very distinguished f
der 3lrs. Powell's will.

'the SOLICITOR-OCNERAI
but my Learned Friends have
miniscenses, which fled during
The LORD CHANCELLOR—
chiId of a legal parent, it may
from injuring his child.
M:. HART—Yes, my Lord,
provision lute been made for c
none but what has been joined
The LORD CHANCE LLOR—
terponition of a (Inure.
31r. ABEICROMBY followed
the petition. lie had no doubt
bound to interfere if the legal fath
don was to injure diem, and was
From 1823 to 1825 the children
parent, and it was not until