The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser.
London, England, 1810-11-09 00:00:00

LAW iNTELLIGENct.

. .
liefendant; why he should pot thew by what right
he Claimed to be a member or the Common Coun-
cil of f averford-Ws4 t—The election sr the De-
fends and several others. took place under the
follow g circumstances :—Tbs Ilsyor, to be cor-
!met a the poll, applied to a traumas (is Mr. Jones)
for his assistance oil the occcasion. A Gentleman
put a question to the Defendant, whether he had

coerr OF KIN G's DENCIIv Nor. I.

10014 1117ADATT, SAILT• AGALNST IFIAWCIA
ooget COLE.SI-IN. ISQ• ALIJA/AT AT AMMO ow
100, WASS OF 1.-01ADI0NI.
INIT4AINAL rose, Sad $lll4O
IM 1111.
- _

~ The Al"llL to the Court to -
pot off the Trial received the sacrament dune that year ?He re-
td tstG,h apply
action until after the arguments fused to *mver, on which the same Gentleman de-
clared that the Wen:lent. or the other Caisehelates,
Lrthesr is the
cupoa°9ov.caeDn eacmtuiornrewr.
broughthificihedlieblitu.thCPlain
!ile'""nsined'iali Ch 1 Abbott S could not be elected without declaring whe-
t the Right on. ar es 7 peaker ther they had er had wit received the Sawa-
.'" f Commons, for the following rear House o . smut previous to the election. He slim stated,
brought a au t the Ser'ea
t5,...19 Vie idle" It ” J • lit that he had in his possession a case which was cuu-
kali, the Declaration states, that Defendant firmed in the Court of King's Bench, to that effect;
'wiener, and broken open the the tonal force sod . .
le Motor and Mr. Jones repeatedly called on him
f Nod, and imprisoned Imo is, the Tower to let them see the case, which he refused ; and
nee
contrary to la To this Declaration
loot a, cou ,w. . s Mr. Jones not betog aware of surh a one being in
tewilet p;raded, that I houtiff was a Member of exietence, 'Advised the Mayor to adjourn the poll to
usase of Cotnniona; that he hail, in his place, the miewiut; day.
Between the adjournment and
,skit Hover, avowed himself as the author of a the meeong next day, the Defeisdaut sod some
Published is, Co&bare Weekly I:Tiger ; other caulk!Sacrament privately
des received the • y
did letter was voted by that Wipe a areas, at Lily K-usington's house. This was what the
moue, sod wicked libel ou titet House ; sad Learned Seryeant's clients complained of. He
:thessiti House came ton resolution he aid ' . that the (Mr. A itorney.Geueral) held in hie baud the affida-
FurciA should he committed so the Tower of'ens of the atiyor and Mr. -1
of ..0.1e11, whin 110947.7ee1Y
~ for the same; that the Speaker issued his deeded that they adjourned the poll with the lutes,.
Feat for that purpose, and gave it to the Defeo- tinu of giving the Defendant an opportunity
At to mote; that he, the said Defendant, in of receiving the Sacraineut ; but that they did it
ee theta, and in virtue of his office as to give enemtelvta an opportunity of biewg
et Amu aforesaid, did anent the said Sir made acquili.ited with the case ItleiltlUlltd by the
. sad did imprisou the said Sir F. in the said Gentlem tit, and which he refused to skew theni.
%err of Loudon.—.T 0 this plea Sir F. replied, Mr. Jones, dining the evening, searc.,ed for it. st.ii
be, the said Defendant, did use more violence funnel .o.—lt was The King v. Ilawkinr, and did
wll liecestary or fitting for the sage.—Ulan not bear on the case ; and so lit &tiered at the
m
loam, and those pleading*, issue had been ineetregeni the folherio„,a day, alien the poll ails re-
ad in that action, and it wee fixed to be tried opene•il, and the Defendant elected. But suppose,
the2uth day of this mouth.—. There was 0.0 said the Learned Counsel, the Defentinit had hot
thrtaetion brought by thesame Plaintiff again st rece.vetl the Sacrament during adjourtinient, hie
eight 800. Charles Abbott, Speaker of the election wcill I reimiitv g 001, for tile Act of fn-
.of Contemns. and the pleadiugs in both demnity (the ,imh if the King) sets forth. that any
. tern in matter and form pretty nearly alike. perste; elects. I. and who received the S,cratu..tit
,nyeeemss a difference in the conduct of the I before the year 1911, should he competent to fill
'add is tins action, for instead oe joining ianve I such sou:gm:is to which they had bee', so chosen.
via, esti petting himself upoti his country, and Lord ENV.; istinovait—o 1 iliti.k there i- some.
bushy lento; the case go to a Jury. he thought thing intricate in this case, and th it might to
'to cuter sicl file a iiiontirter. The eonwrittestre come belore th. Court in the fullest 111367ileir ; I
calls the: he himself puts the question of Imo thriefore think the rule ought to be- in •ile ahmlute,
6.0. ro aseesteiii, therefore, the quest on of which wilt minlile us to have .t argued at length."
to vote the subject. was not only a (loanable Buie made absolute.
•sr, bet iti instice was that which should precede THE JUNG V. Roil it.
motel the feet; god, therefore, to scold uoi- Mr. Arrows ey-Gewismat --e This is a similer
tesoaryroiede both to the Court and the parties, case to the last, except that the Defendant did
ilees•td it aster end better fur pu'.lic ailsantage, receive tit., ti..i rainent before the firs' day of elec.
mach more likely to serve the ends of public I hum which (Mee away with the complaint, slid of
potter, eat their Lordships should first decide course the rule mintiveritschargril with costs.
i. 4 give tohpnent on the Demurrer. and theit Mr. Serjeatis lat 44 4cknovilr4tH th it the elate-
sty, and ant till Corti. open the matter of fact. meta of Air. Artvriey-Denritil was true, bur the
fie hoped and trusted that no person would Defendant had deceived the 4.'timpluitiants by re..
Aine that he was desirous for d&ay. Oa the fusing to amiss er whether he had mar hid not receir-
oerae, lie had used every possible owe soil lib. ad the Sitersiti• lit
pee, tam the first, to have those matters breaglit I Lord ELhessogoccu—" I cannot hold, brother
u s Needy ccaelession. The Court shonld tau- Le" toot a remit late at an election has a right to
littertul that the P:aintiff did not tile his declare. answer even question put to him by his electors, or
lisesel the igth of May. Ou :list 16th of the a party oppner,• to l• ."
Stleliios7ll* he (the Atterues.Geoeval) fikii. his Itule dutittuwed with costs -
fie; notaithstaudiog that by tile practice of the THE at ash, it. atcil.
Cwt, it was entitled, by their usual uolulkience, Mr. GLithres; moved toe 4 Rule to ~hewcause
fried% fortheetime. He did oot„ hiswever. avail i why the 'erase( in MI indictment should not he
loud( of any stick indulgence or right, but I Set aside. or a hew trial granted. It WWI feted be-
firadulterthrith. What, em the other hand, was I fore Mr. Justice Le Blene at the lest Assizes iit
foe conduct of the other side ? Notwithatandine Oxford, and a verdict given for the Crowe. It
tt'e curly PIXY?' at which the turd pies were filed, t was en toidtctsuent against two belies, of the name
the Pianaiffdtwo sot tile his Demurrer till the 17th of It-di, fur nut repairing • bridge in Berita. He
of June, it seeks after he had filed his dee' ins- would not contend that, as the owners of the manor,
fife: nor has he even yet thought fit to join issue they were not etbltio-d to repafr ; tint he weld,
upon bus own Demurrer. that they were net liable to rebuild. lii the per.
The opalinea upon the Demurrer may yet take seat rat, the bridge was blown flows. by the visi-
414ce, tithe Defeudant pleases. on Tuesday mitt. mho:, s.f Gust, which could bet have bens rarest, n
hen the Friday then following. If the Plaint Wile rwe prevented by human in ons. It had beets de.
-fore willing to join in Demurrer. so as to gwe teriniiied its costa of embankment on the sea-cuesis
It:opportunity ief having the souse argued on either • where hiesehes had been made by storm. the
tie" days, he (the Attararj.tkurrsl) would county was liable.
early edireatage of the present motion, and go Lord Ei.l.ltaaoltetloll—.." Can you point nut
trial on the day already Axed. He then moved where a county is islet: to tile visitatioo of God,
Para Role, 'calling upon Sir Francis Burdett to sad individuals not'"
en cause shy the trial at bar, is, the action which I Mr. GLEADa—,. Certainly not, my Lord."
11000 against Fraucie George Cabrnet,. Eq. Mr. Justice La BLAsc--" It may be very severe
'lnch stands fixed fee the Ooth for. imam'', egotist the Lashes but certainly the case is very
not be pat off until the Court should give j strong agamst the,o."
4,11 t upon the Demurrer filed in the act by I Rule ref used.
• leought against the Hon. Charles Abbot."
Toe Crime inquired whether notices of tool had
1 FW!4I in the two *miens upon which Mime hie! FULL v. HaRNIISS.
it pond ?—The Attorisey.General auowered This action was inetoght by tee Plaintiff, an At-
at were had not.
t"r"ey of this Coact, fur a debt of 61. 1 Ir. 11,1. Ina
TS!. Arrrotecy-GettERAL then added, that th
curred by toe Defetolsiii, who holds a sttuatton in
te Plamtiff had lame lit awn her action w.,rtihset
the Tramitvort Office; in cotiargariwe of Plaintiff
~, I: oof Moira, a, Coanetable of the TOWrr. for having inorled ceptato law-procredinga 111 his be.
`rely detaining him in custody there; to winch ,i,i wi, actiwil b'l f %chats e Before
A Defendant hail also pleaded in form null half ---- -on
a I o e g .
. . the tertninstinit of the law-peneeeilings, however,
',malice Dearlythe ' •
ps Sericant at Arms 11-CI
, the present Defendant had compromised with the
.': varyiug Inis plea with the allegatome, toot „,,, who were Plaintiffs tuatiat action, and pro-
ell'd ol Lis capacity of Constable as aforesaid, el—*".
if were of course stopped; and he now is-
trintino• II anti bound to receive and detain psi- fufrseddlue .
p Cie costs incurred by the step,. token
41:'1,11, ell•d•oly A 'nitwit ted in him. 'flit saint ma- . the cia•istie! br Mr. Hill. The bull its tpsestom
'frier... prevailed in this action to have the " • ' * c
~. . that had beet) drawn by a Mr. ',memo, who is no.. de.
• sin elf that existed i the
J.,,,.,. n c other, namely, ceased. and accepted by the Defendant. In con-
, 1 'nom tol• law shook, have the precedency of of • • had l
I:‘.nt a writ .1(4.11 it.
.• T"ltr of fact. But there vise also in this ac- ""Ptel,,;ve its
"""*Purlieof 'a
h. h and noire of
tois hi additional reasim : Air. V. Lord "led Il'- 'nut
him,
a copy • c'
evidence" of
ovine, siii •16.°Y"declaration. it appeared from the
. , • tenor. hail but recently heard that Mr
t•aiemsus - • ' George Hil:, the brother of the Plaintiff, and who,
d who is a most material wituess tor his at the time of the transaction, wee ren• ydo ed as Ins
eel, was absent, and with the army • P
114 all h
t,,, ere ht is now ferrying with advantage 1 1111
• '"' country and he, himself. with t, weevil to (Wend the *coot,. Mr. George ..
''''it of 11.44i,,t.civiitIreollir
as
wae,incewili
int
list: , etas totally ignorant of the person who broti4l.t
them ; but. he supposed at the
l'' ''''l Coital! 1 battle
f. • ' at the rezent of Burnt. . rent by direetion of Mr. Harness. He had
application had been mode at the tV•r-Of were
d
.. never seen Mr. Hiram* at his brother's office ; he
147 SOUS li• lie knew of I I
Pat; hut the, . , - had called uts him twice at the Trenspert.oeire ;
tele 1 , nig return to this military could ion once in October IVO. w P
hes he resented live bid
dit P see in time fur the trial, and he Is 1 ffi
hail la - of costs, at which time Mr. flames,. stated that he
as to that effect. /
tillt this -11 these Kutlithlsit he moved would call ou Mr. Hill on the following cloy ; and
1 Et
trial .1.. should he put oll• . agent, when be served hint with the copy of a writ
Nis,, _
.....t.exemtfleGa.—" Take three Rates oil the 'lld of January lost.
shZ.R.,..°o7,tinct Rule is, each ectirm ; and let copies Robert Carvell, who woe also • clerk in Plain-
thecf._ pin,-grin as hitherto had, be delivered to tiff's office at the time the copy of the writ was left
et,
1.,7,7 n time. The Coast will find it moo-
there. depoasel that lie had sever seen Mr. Ilartie.ss
if ihe"u‘).P,o,' process of each action to be ill pol.lClltiall at his master'. office, but lie had taken •bII of
The Ayr costs to Defendant at the Transport Office. at an
'iliaii,l 1,,, °IIIeXT-GltWithat. answered,—that "re c,adier pcsiod to the busium than that mentioned
beer e...,,• takes, to eupply their Lordsittips on:. 10. last settee-1h at a hich time Mr. Heroes.* said,
T ~vutiate document. that lie would call mid settle with the Plaintiff.—
° lee Nlisi were all granted. Ile had hero with Mr. 11 entree very lately, midi.:
Ile s
li Tat ItIVG e. Patti try. the following circumstacees:—lle understood that
trOaaa •
T-Geli veer, shrived mist twine ;Mr. I lid intended to fahiscena him (the witness) on
I Rde ahtei
Ind by No be'jeant Less, *gains. the t.• present ::i....!, and in courequence be called

COURT OF C031310N PLEAS, Wasvaings, Nov. •

. .
upon him. Mr. Hill then intOntted him, that iii
thought he would have erittestri fishnet wittiest!
his amistaneo. .Witnws fry offaucled at thin treat!

_
welds rind; as be had hid some trouble, he 'via
determined, if pomilile, to he Hid fur it p he there-
fore went to Mr. Mane's (the -Defendant) aud haw-
ing tutted that he believed he was the only Perscu
who could prove Platiattra ceer, inquired •• whe-
ther he (Mr. Harness) would give Ws any thing in
ease he did not come *forward with his evidence?"
This, however, Mr. Harness hail declined.

Mr. Serjraut Bart. in addrevaing the Jury,
stated, that it was out enough for the Minna to
prove that the Witness had been done—uii, he
ought to rhea that it was executed by the 'special
direction of the Defendant. which, hr contended,

hod not been mode out. Neither or the witurenee

could tell who kit the copy of tits writ at Ilic Philo-

gitrs office. When Mr. de.o. Hill eiilled on the. De-
fendant with thr bill costs. hr did not al he

would pay the Plaintiff ; he mint? 'Awed that he
woad call on him. With respect to the .serosid
witness. who had sworn that Mr. Harness VIA he

sum, lib had dentillany bows lodge of an agreetbsnt
to give them to Mr. Wiiistanley ; cud rebtstil to de-
liver them to two peracni but Ur. Plitmaii.t. lie
Deicr before heaid 'hot the Defendant had *eosin
fur more than I. He had brought an action for
the goods ag oust Sir. William Maaiters! biit, PPS
he found that the pOt•SCAMOII of thetas bud. gone
from him. the business had been compromised. on
Sir William's paying lel: for the humor the furaia
tore. He had never before heard of the agreement
mentioned by the last wiines., that if ten pounds
were out paid at a certain nine the goods should
become the property of the Defendant.
A rule of Court, that had been drawn up by tho
Defendant's Attorney; in a former weans which
been brought agittuitt him relative to these ay.
tides of furniture, but had not been procesded
its which he notified his intention of defending the
scuba on the ground of having retinae(' possession
of the goo.to RN a security r., fire *minds due to
him, was here vat in, and ad.oitted in evidence.

would pay Mr. 1101, after what he had stated of
himself, ne did toot think be ICIs worthy of credit.
Th., Jury surely would not trust that witness, who,
hatvitig quarrelled with his late employer, insane.
diately went to the other party for ►he put pose of
rot:riving.• comeronottion for suppressing los era-

A perann hf the nime of linivineen &paned►
that he tlinnaht tiir yto ds wrre aorth the pits
annexed to them in the list, Litton 1.,11.

deuce. -He could call no wiNiew.e..* in the Cas,—

atrurta was. of cow... itteuitwetent ; and dlr.

Gormiio had crawl to torsi. fir Agaiti tepernted.
Cod Mr. George Hill had proved nothing against
bin chew.; and uo credit could be given to the

other *line's.

Lord ewer Jttstice Nlonsetet.o—su The notice
of J,claratims writieh has been put in, must have

be it serve.l at tai • urferai pit's house, anti, if pro.

pray dewit.er,l,2au,t liov, berg given to the De-

irotiaat Limerlf. Hurt then dill it get into the
howl. of Mr. 14.11? There certainly is no proof
that Manes, ever via. at the iiii ff's bowie. ur

that he hod any acquaintance with hint--hut it ap-
pears strange. as the copy of writ and notice of de-
clarittioa mug have beep in possession of Defend-
stit. on who a they were served. how they could be
taken from his custody, without him knowledge.
and placed In that of the Plaintiff. The Willie..
(101 l tied deposed, that Defendant said he would
call on Pt iantiff.' You must consular whether that
declaration is sufficient to prove that Heroes* kuew
I'lcotiff was defending an action for him. It be
was ignorant of the circistal.tanee. why did he not
ricoreaa some surprise ut being presouted with a
hill. aleim the menses of which he knew uothisig?—
Ir full credit were given to the testimony of Car-
vell, there would be an rod of the action—as hr
had sworn that Mr. Harness had confew.ed his ha-
tinny—h.* conduct, however, in calling ou Mr.
I M00r... for the purnosr of re. tiring a flow* ur to
keep ba-k his evidence, renders lout opals to coo-
-1 soletable an-pidon. 1 nook the nonce of &clona-
llion must have been screed on the Ifefentlein. and
wont got out of his hoods vtith his komeledge; and
I why, I wonl-1 ask. should it be thus carried to
IPlatiddra off,..e, without there was an lUieliijoa Of
geeing:: loin to defend the comae?"
Verdict for the Plaintill---.6.usges 61. I ls. 10d.
Mr. S.-6,410 Heir —..l.lterendatit is an ideal. aud
will seek my ewissesif ity-a saa pf rums."

FEICSON 0. CALLOW.
Th.ft+ Wag en Net ion for the prier of two pigs sold to
the Defendant by Plettall. The cause woo not
led. Call.na, it appeared. had entrre.l into
on az,retittent with the Plaintiff on the :lath of Nl.iy
last, to purchase fnur pigs, for which he was to
pay Itit. sod which were to be taken from
tirt's premises on the following dny. At the .pe.
coded time, Defendaht sent for two of the pigs,
but refused to take the other two, which were still
pOSSell$101), really to he delivered up...-
Vet:het lur Plaintiff--damages SI.

Mr. Sergeant Brse, fur the Dcfeartlant, address.
eil the Jury A Ith great eintliseiree. He ileprecated
the practice of Attornert coming forward to give
evidence in cases where they were thenseeltes wipe
ployed, and in which, of course, they meet feit a
considerable hide. A great I air Authority am
of thy same opinion ; and he treat.. I, as ha
now had it in his power. beine i Peer of the
Keehn. that he would bring • 1341 into liarlirarairat,
for the outwore of preventing inch proettedd r... i..."
lie contended, that the Joey hid no right to pritia
• witness's evidence; they • onild id her receive sr
reject it altogether. if this ..ritoriple were foileered
in the present cam, there must b • 4 verdict for bit
client; for if they believed all Bruee's ellci-are,
it went clearly to prove. that. by the Plaintiff's
failing to pay a stipulated ewe ea a cerise"'
day to the Defendant, his right in •the- thip4t..
eel property had cravei before the 'ellen was
tireoght. if, en the other hind, they di •believed.
it, then Mr. Pitcher's evidence went for nothing;
for, in en action of this deserintlin, it was nee- If ti-
thmt the disputed articles ahnold be speeift-doweich
Broce had done, but Mr. Pitch*, ',Le totally issi
competent to do; and, therefore, if 'h..y '44%4
Bruce's evidence. that weer surf r t era betel
proved. • ventiti for his ch. et met fall .sir„
I.nrrl Chief Justice Mistime," swot wed litho
evidence with great orciiracy....:ie was of ermine
that the Jury had a right to cm credit either Its
the whole or part of any evidence which ewer be.
fore them, as to them should seem proper. A mit.
ne-s might, in some instances, speak incoereetlye
and, in *them, his deposi•ion might be tattles*
(I Verdict
with troth.
Verdict for the Pt oistiff. &stages 11"1. wheat
,to the tletlitetinit of the-Si. die onginetly by Ptak*
I tato Defendant.

•-... , . . • -
LiflF INTEiLkiNd. .- . •
Tiefendent. why be should pot thew by what right upon hip. Mr. Hill then jorr;rnslid him, that he I sum, he had tit:14'1)811y knowledge of an agrecintnt
—.--....--- . he Claimed to be a member of the Common Coon. thought he would have snidest% eisbugh without 'to give them to Mr. Witotenley ; and termite; tir de-
OW Of KING'S DENCIIe Nor. I. ell of averford-West [—The election ef the De- his amistiteem ,‘Vitssior felt °Peeled at this treat• liter them to ewe peremi taut Mr. Pliteseit.t. lie
... ---. fends and several others. took plait under the meat, endi as he had hardhardsome trouble, he was - :osier Infere heard that the. Defendeo be le
t d *vist .
1. BeaI:ATT, SART. Atial.Nier FOAMS
:—T
pietav follow g circumstances bil Mrflur, to be core determined, if poesilile, to be Hid fur it ;he there.. Fur more than 61. He had brought an *alma for
.1,
taws cotestam. 'SQ. VELISANT AT anti or recta the poll. applied to • Barrister (it Mr. Jones) fore went to Mr. Harness (the Defendant) aud hem the goods lig oust Sir. William hie:mots: bill, WS
. • ..., s. , cot; os volittanha. A..; for his assistance on the occcssion. A Gentleman ing stated that lie bettered he was the only Perms he found that the pastICAMOII sof them bud. gone
. 14-e-;ooagew-GalltiltAL rose, and saideriet Ent a question to the Defendant, whether he had who could prove Platiairs case, iutinired r• whe- from him, the Ittesinem had !nee compromised. on
itt ii:id to apply to the Court to pot off the vial received the sacrament duriuo that year? Hr re- Hier he (Mr. Hanlon) would give him any thing in Sir William's paying left for the tumor tlw loran
d e above action until after the arguments fused to emptier, on which the swat Gentleman de- time he did not come 'forward with his evideuce )" tare• He had never before heard of the agreement
Ihr la th Demurrer, filed by the Plain-
t,. ._ Ism upon a . elated that the 'Defendant. or the other Catodidete.s, This, however, Mr. Harness hail declined. • mentioned.
by the last wishes., that if ten pounds
1 ' aedin an action which he hew brought could not be elected without declaring wise- Mr. Serjeaut Bast, in addrewitig the Jury, I were nut pied at a certain lime the goods should
liwtf rhnelig'ld Hon. Charles Abbott, Speaker thee they had or had not received the Sawa- stated, that it was not enough for the Plentilf to • become the property of the Defendant.
" House of Commons, for the following sea- Relent previous to the election. He also stated, prove that the business lied been dose—alit lie ! A rule of Celia, that had been drawn up by the
„ the
.....4,, ti:e action brought against the Serjeant that he had in his possession a case which was cuu- ought to chew that it wee executed by the 'simnel Defendent's Attorney; in a former action which
the Declaration state", that Defeudent firmed iu the Court of King's Bench, to that effect; direction of the Defendant. which, he contended, leiel been brought against hies relative to them am
Vinsi;
farce and violence, and broken open the the Nlator and Mr. Jones repeatedly called on h•m had not been made out. Neither of the wain-saes tides of funtitnre, but heal not been proceeded in,
of Pleiutiff, and Imprisoned him iii the Tower to let them see the case, which he ristesed ; end could tell who left the copy of tint writ at the Plait,- lin which he notified his intention of defending the
contrary to law. To this Declaration. Mr. Jones nut heel aware of smelt a one being in titre ogice. When Mr. Geo. Hill celled on the De. action on the grouted of having retained possession
1444tet:'n'p;eaded, that Plaiutiff was a Member of existence, Asked the Mayor to adjourn the pod to fendent with the bill of costs. lie did not say he lof the goods RN a security fir due outintls due to
Hew or commons: that he had, in his place, the following day. Hetweeu the adjourisment and inlaid pay the Pleititiff ;he merely Ataled that he him, was here vitt iii, mid ad pitted in evidence.
e wit Hover, avowed
.himself as the author of' a the fleeing next day, the Defeisdatit mod some sorteld call on hint. With respect to the iircond A person id' the name of Hoteingdon &posted,
.i
e, published iii Co&liat'i Weekly Begistcr; other caulid des received the Sacrament privately witness, who hart sworn that Mr. Ilarneei nisi he that he tliotielit the gods were worth the price
aid latter was rated by that el•ise a gross, at Lidy K-eisington's house. This was what the would pan Mr. Hill, after what lie hail stated of .
eannexed to them in the list, abort IJI.
.., : Aces, and sicked libel on that House ; mid Learned Serjeiteit'r clients complained of. He himself, ne did tint think he was worthy of credit.
Mr. Sergeent Byte, for the Dcfeittlant, add
r toossid House came cos resolution that the said (Mr. A itortiey-Gelieral) held in boo baud the Aide- The Jury surely would not trust that witness, who,
hl the Jar ry with great eimpseitee. He de Ara
yrect„,hould be committed to 'the Tower of vita of the Ntitiit and of Mr. Josses, W/111 isoltiseiy hitensg quarrelled with his late..eutployer, iii": the practice of' Attorneys corning forward to giro
1, Intl for the mune ; that the Speaker issued his deeded that they adjourned the poll with the nitrite diatel4 went to the other party for the put pose of evidence in ea where they were the lee. acne
4. orro, for that purpose, end gate it to the Defeo- tinu of giving the Defendant an opportunity mei ng a compensation for suppressing Ins ere. ployed. and in which, of course, they mast feiks -
,it to „Klee; that he, the said Defendant, in of receivine the Sacrament; but that they did it deuce. He could call no witiiewees in the case— coesiderable bide. A great las Authority was
wooer teereuf, and in virtue of his office as to give themselves en opportunity of being I Mr. Harness was, of comer, iticuineetent ; and Mr.
of the same opining ; and he treet...l, as ha
. • otst Arun aforesaid, did arrest the mid Sir made acre-wiled with the casellleittluntd by the Gorman had cresol to vest.ll.- again repeated, now had it in opinion
power. better a Peer of the
. and did imprisou the said Sir F. in the fetid Gentlein tie, and which he refused to thew them. - Cod Mr. George Hill had proved nothing ',cellist
Keehn. that he would brine a Bill into Parharaidat,
••thisplea Sir re 1•I
ever of Lourlon.—.To for the purpose of preventing such proceed er......
teethe said Defendant, did use more violence found if.--It was The King v. newt:ins, end did ' other witness.
He (midyear& that the Jury esd no right to gerlshe
•. at, oeentary or fitting for the lonse.—Upon not bear on the case ; and so lit declared at the Lord Creel Jostles Meserter.o—or The notice
• witness's evidence; they • 'mild vi• her iris se
~ : „oration, and those pleading+. issue had been meetregen the foliewitig day, when the poll ass ►re- of declaration which hoe beets put in, must have
reject it altionther. If this ..ritiemle were followed
din that action, cod it was fixed to be tried opened, and the Defensfain elecierl. But suppose, be n served at th • Defend-tilt', house, anti. if pro-
tevreoh day of this mouth.—. There was also said the Learned Counsels the Defenreitit had sett ii the th st b• 4 verdict for bit
prineist case, ere 0111
perly det,Vreell, roust liar, bees given to the De- client; far it they betteee4 a 8,,,,,,e, ces.terwer,
eeravion brought by 'hemline Plaiiittff eget, st rece.vrol the Sacrament durinii adjournment. his readout himself. How then did it get into the it wen, clearly to ...am, rho. by the piemittete
Isi• eight Boa. Charles Abbott. Speaker of the election %trio' t remliti g eel, for tile eilcl of la. hands of Mr. Hill? There certainly is no proof (-who. to ...., a refl....loyd In:a au a certain .
ao of Commons. and the pleadings in leish downer,. (rhe.iorts hi the King) sets forth, that any • that !Wimp ever was at the II • ff 's home. or day t`n the rpreyentianr, his right nt 'twee divot.
,eat were in matter and form pretty nearly alike. perm., elect.- I. suet who tecrivril the S.cratuesit that lie had any acgiesiutance with hits--hut it sp.
ed property had creel before the "ellen was
~, at tem.., a difference in the conduct of the I before the y•ver 1811, should he conmetent to fill pears strange, as the copy of writ and notice of tie-
firooght. If, on tlx other hind, they di -believed.
rt- • doe is tali action. for anneal of joining issue I such attuatious to which they had been so chosen. . cleretioa inuet have beep in possession of Defend•
it, then Mr. Pitcher's evidence went foe nothiegt
e . is, ea petting hiinwir olio. his country. end Lord E Lute avant:an-0 1 think there i- some. aut. on who n they were served. how they could be for, in
an
scrimp
of this desettintatt. it was nec atm.
tetchy low:Vitt case go to a Jury. he thought thing intricate to this case, end Ow it ought to taken from his custody, without his knowledge,
...,Host the disimted articles ithould be speeifi-di writeit
•te eatersel file a D"osurrer. The nionnliiritce come helore ill, Court in the fullest 1113611iier 1 I and placed in that of the Plaintiff. Ttie witue-s
nßrute had done, but Mr. Pitch*, w-• • totally him
hereto. do: he himself pots the question of taro ti,riefore think the rule ought to be in .de ahmlute, Dill tied deposed, that Defendant said the would
-n cotnpetent to do; and, therefore, if they "riveted
ihei. re nierrtviii, therefore, the timeline of • which "ill enable us to have it argued at length." . colt on PI iantiff.' You must conisider whether that
' • spin the subject. was not only a desirable Mule tun le ulisieute. I tleciarettoes is suScieut to prove that Heroes. knew Bruce's evidence, that sew mere re t not being
i proved, a reedits for his ch. nt mu .t full .w.
e ...e, bight intent was that which shined precede THE JUNO e. 8041141. lrls“.ll6. was defending an action for him. If he Lord Chief Justice Mansion., seal wed epthis
t -strudel the fact; sod, therefore, to avoid on- Mr. ATTouts Ey-GewiretAe—e This is a similar was ienoraiit of the circistatdmee, why del he not
evidence with great wrcerere....llle was of opinion
emery !row& both to the Court and the parties, ease to the lent, except that the Defemlnut did - teterese male teirprise at being preseuted wish a
that the Jury had aright to give credo either to
itera;rd it asset end better fur puelic aelimitage. receive the Set reinent before the tire':lay of rlec- - bill, ghost the items of whichhe knew tiothisig?— she
whole
or part of any emit...tee which ease bet.
each more likely to serve the ends of public nun, which Mies away will) the complaint, aid of ' Ir Isid credit were given to the testimony of Car-
fore them, as so them should seem proper. A mit.
yoke, trot their Lordships should first decide tourer the rule movtlieritscherspet wish cogs. yell, Mere would lie an rut, of the action—es hr
net might. in woe instances, speak iticortietlye
.4 give laden:lent on the Demurrer, and then Mr. Herjearis Las. ackwwwir4gra Us it this. Plate- had email' that Mr. Hovels had confessed his ha-
mid. in roh:ere, his deposeion might be peace*
W. ly, ood ant till thou, open the matter of fart. meld of Ale Attorney-General war true. but the betty—h.* conduct, hoist-err, in calling on Mr. -
Consistent with instil.
en lit kited and trusted that no penes:, would Defendant had deceived Ili. Ctimphitianta by re- ithroes.. for the purpose of re citing is fleecier to
Verdict for the Plriatiff. damages mi. whistle
r 4 • - isle that he was desirous fir delay. Oa the fusing to &nosier whether he lied ur lied not weir- keep baek his evidence, renders him open to con- to the 4,100;00 of „m.o. dos
anstuany by rtai.
2., ....), lie had used every pessible care and lib. ied thy Sitersets.iit soletable siepieiou. 1 think tole were of declare-
tiff to Defendant.
..: pee, Linn the first, to have those matters breaglit Lord ELLitillatritoUGH--" I cannot hold, brother lion must beer been served on the Oeferideet. and ...-aszaiarman .
-: Os !re,* CeaCION100• The Court *honk' us,. Lime, tnat a causal tats at en election her a right to 1 veto got out of lii. heeds with his kiinwleile ; and OLD BAILEY, Norf. 11.
emend that the retitled did not tile his declare- answer evert euestiou put to hum by his electors. or I why, I wont,' ink, should it be thus tarried to —............,...
) *nee the 11:/th of Mac. On the 16th of the i a parry oppose.• to I' ." Plaiiitiff's affee, without there was an tuteutioo of Jewett Ticker, a man of de. eat appeareche. as
see is u:i (S. he (the Attrernee-Geoeval) filed. his Ltule dientisaed with costs .. gertiner lore to defend the emelt- ?" pnt to the bar to take his ensi, on en irtritelifillit
F ea; aotaithstaudiare that by the practice of the : one luso, e. ItICII. i l'er.liet for the Plaintiff—damages 61. 11s. lesd. charging bun whit bewailing a SOW seal, in tbrbooest
fan, I:e was entitled, by their oaths! stololgence, Mr.:GUMP.; mowed tot a Bute to phew cause I Mr. S•ojeant llesr—oteedenthec is sti jalaitlioud of Sir &lomat O'Brien Price. at Bromptoo,eorthe
'u beads farthertime. lie duleot, hnwevvr. avail - why the "err-bet-in tins indictment .hoidd not he i I will seek may mormoily.hy-o emit ednisia." _. . N 4.4 Amtalot jest .._ _
.__, ,
.. .
ieseelf of my such indulgence or right, bat j set aside. or a new trial greeted. It WaS tetra be- j eExsoe v. eAt.t.OW. Mr. n0t.r.4110 stated the ease on the part of the
-leideltortheithe What, on the other head, was I fore W. Justice Le Blanc nt the hot Assizes et This was an melon for the price of two pigs sold to prosecutor.
ite ete conduct of the other side ? Netwithetandine Oxford, and a verdict given for the Crowie It the Defendant by Plaietlf. The cause was oot
The first witness celled was William Tamer. thc
1' ' the earl,' 'whorls at which the mid pleas were Well, I wits as tisiitctruent egoista two belies, of the name defen led. Calker, it appeared,
had elitere'l into black servantofSir Rdwerd 0' linen Priori. Hlostuse
'l* Ile' Piintiffdoes sot tile his Demurrer till the 17th of lt.eb, fur nut repining; • bridge in Berke. He an aereedient with the Plaintiff unthe
eeth of Mly
plll deposed, that on the Id of Align., the Pirsesesee
of June, etz seeks after he had flied bis decd ire- would net conteetti that, as the ow to,. of di, igo,mor, hat?, to purchase four pigs, for which he was 10
came to his master's hawse. and torik away I WWI.
' l',` tire; sot hey he even yet thought fit to join issue they were not obliged to raper ; brit he would, pay itil. slid which were to he taken from Plain-
City of cloth, under pretence that he acted in Boo-
r u upon his own Demurrer. that they were net liable to rebuild. In the ore- tiff's premise% on the following tiny. At the stir-
fortnite with tee Barerosi's dinetiens. He did OWL
lit." The erguestwes upon the Demurrer may yet tells vent vai er. the hedge was blown dove. by the visi- relied time, Defendabt sent for two of the pies '
' know of the closet having bees beekeopen ; nett did
slue, tithe Defeutfant plying. on Tuesday /text. mice, tif Guth, which could trot hare beret fereer. n ' hilt refits...l to take the other two, which were still
h know any thing of the soil ehseh Is mod i the
--1 mike Friday then following. If the Plaint Ifbe -or prevented by hum o* in-ons. It had oeeis de. In latent ars possessiou. ready to he delivered up.— I ground of the iodic/meet. On his ere sseesendrow
wet . r al
ewe issuing to' oin in Demurrer. so es V. ;VIM tennuted iu retailer eouttanktnent on the sea-rood. Veidict lur Plaintiff--damages SI. prevaricated cousiderebly sato th.• Dumber
w!te aerportenity 'divining the came argued on either : wiltre hresehes had been wade by storm, the wt est. it I. £ '1" r. release-NT. of place+ to *lnch his master had heed : and wee
!Pi' those days, he (the Atterary.Gewerel) would comity was liable. Titus wad an meta)))) for the mete of certain goods, iw th some diffieulte induced to enures., ili elegised
to •• early eerestage of lbw present motion, and go
n Lord Ei.l.ltaatiltettoH---" Can you point nut alleged to be the properly of I'leintiff, which were waited open the Beronet st a lock-up-+ouve Year
io
old en the day already Axed. He then moved where a counts is teeter to tile visitutiou of God,
improperly detained by D•fenitant. Temple Bar, oithisi the last two months.
la: Nei Role, milling upon Sir Francis Burdett to sad individusis not ?" The Plaineiff, it appeared was a broker, and had John Wand, a Police Officer, beloneiog to Hat.
• cause why the trial at bar, iu the action which I Mr. GLlgAne.. Certainly not, my Lord." ' supplied Sr Wm. Mennen, while in the King's ton-garden Office, deposed. that lie accompanl6l
se;i 'hnsight against Frani. Creefge Culemen, H.q. Mr. Ju.tiee Le BLANC••••" it may be very severe .
Bench, with certain articles of furniture, whir h,on sir Edward O'Brien Prior to the lodging. of the
- which stands fixed firs the O.Oth Noe. instant, egonst the Lathes but certainly the case is very a the enlareensent of Sir Williern, hail been pieced prisoner, in Baldwasegarrieme in company With s
i,
It ". . not lee pet ea ants! the temort eliould give strong egeseist thee). iuthe custody of the present Dr fendant, as a sects- holier officer. untried Read, anda parish iroastetin
he t , . rut upon the Demurrer tiled in the act t by t Rule relined. rity far the sum of 51. doe by Win-Nutley to him, who cattle with the Banter : having proCepard to
0 I , ..................
lorouelit against the Hon. Charles Abbot." Mr. Pheasant, on his quitting the King's Bench, had the room pointed out es the residence of the Pei-
COURT OF C031310N PLEAS, WetvalisTelt, Nov. it.
I." Tit Celan inquired whether notices of tool had left the furniture in the care rif a Mr. Brie e; I , me., he searched every place is tallith it was
fro-
a rent in the two *miens upon which issue had who. beim; called on the 'me ,:fOw Pleintiff, dee likely the alleged stolen property could be coo.
fer RILL v. HaRNIISS.
joined ?—The Attortay•General auswered This action was isroaeht lay tee Plaintiff. an At- posed, than. its Atagnst 11407, lie knee Mr. Phi a- I vented : imienget other places. he carefully searched
t tier, had t. y a ono court ei, a debt of 61 Its. 101 Iwo Mit lit the Kiug's Beech ;ehes he left it he pot a chest defrosters. tete wee suable to linel any thing
by The ATTnitTt EY-GENERAL then added, that the
ele tee le - -.1. vie
. i ctntir:elesa by tee Defei:ilaite, who holds a situation 111 the gouda limier the care of the witness; Mr. Win- allivdi could establials Ilse will' of the Presenter,
mann nail 1.1.00814 itemiser refine wertihstThe Proseciitor directed him to hook Ode the
t.r. he ' r insole Office; in conset melee of Plaintiff eteuley might have got them by peyieg ten pounds
'"it 'NI or Moira. as Cornish!. of the TOW'''. f'' creilinga ii. his be- to Mr. l'imasent ; that was the sun, for wliitat they drawers Keens ; and just as he w-is about to cumply
tad ' *IY detaining him in custody there; to 'Oriel': heviug num tried cep tein law-prin
half in an action on a bill of ruche's:gr. Before l were sectirey; me. Pheasant had „la for Win- with his directions. im saw Howell. the collate's!e
ah' • t Defendant hail also pleaded in ferns islet • ' • •, of the taw.praersoliaas, however, staidey, and Ile was perfectly aware of the eireum- who accempeuied the Baronet, put h.s hand into a
rro -*sate nearly ps the Sur Carat at Arms h-el
ne re; varyio i;- l . - ; . 1 lire pterre'senitnitl'Ulnelfendent hail Finnipeniniacd with. the st. auce.ttrh,enst. Mr. ph,„„t went to the vomiter, drexer, winch hart been already minutelv ezamtned,
g rs pea istth the a legation,. t sat pro- he left the ict tts in charge of the wittietn, with di-
id '• acted iii Incapacity of Constable as aforesaid. cpe.rsimisg who were Plaintiffs itethat action, andan I bring forth the seal. On heing eiin--exelintied,
were of course stopped ; and he now re. reetinna to ,heseer them sill to mewed-ye an his he said that tic hail been a Police-riff, Cr time year.,
out h "waled anti Miura:l to receive and dentist pre. paying_ the lel.; but Winstenley iiever made to • awl hers often iiriviit at the exeristion of search.
tilt 're en reetely rosisioitted in him. The seine ree.
.ferfrote'idleut-coltty tilrie costs incurred. by the
.steps teken
Hill. The bill its tiiiestien oiler of any y. Ile mid lie would cell on Mr. warrant.; he did not think from the toirenesice he
i "I.'l4'r"ltire. prevailed in this Retina to have the iu iI, • i ite c 1 •1 Pheasant. sod if he did nut ply the lel. in s day had hail, that he could have overlook.ll the deal in
td.• ~.• . , eta. hero erects' by a ~.r. mrsnan, W it) Is urn' ie.
or two, lie would forego all eight to the properly.
IS'
" that
"lilted in the other' naril'AY' tnat ceased. and eccep-ted by the Defendant. lei con-
''' I!..
,''''i wean, tif law ehmild have the ereced"""Y r'i tl--e of its iiiiii-ouvruent a writ had 'semi it- tee search, which lie first inede. He d•I mot, Iwo.
Ile never del call ; nor had the witness ever heard ever, mean to cast any imputation Oa Riede II be
to te e Miner of fact. Bot there we. also in this ac- p".e.'neti:4' strati him, a 'eo-py of 'which, mei notice of of hiiii since. mail hr was served will, a notice of Baronet was wit•iiii a yard of the drawers at the
:•41"' I" au additional re.sem : Mr. Viscay, Lord d.l r tien it appeared from the evidence of Mr. the action. The goods, he thought. were worth ' time the seal was found.
tir'.l:ol': I.Solicitor. had butt recently heard that
.1e.71. or al. He partieulerizeil the articles of furni- 'teed, the police-offizer, being ill, was tenable to
, who is a must material witness lon lit. ,Georgee'l
Hti'l, thebrother of the Plaintiff, and who,
at the time of the transaction, was .111.1141 rd as his tore which had beau in hie po.session, in a list attend.
['''"r Chad, I'4l absesit and with the army in Pio. cterk, had been left at Mr. lull's OE ,:vi with iii- which Pliontiff's Attorney presented Min. Henry Howell was then called end examined.
I' A ttr'ir she h is' i ' h .1
e now arrv.iitt with advantage - mown, to ,ie,elid the action. Me. George Dill As this witness, though called on the part of the lie eepeeed, that he was a constable of Mory.le.
wk. to e,
~ country.of arid honour to himself. with tile ,' wan totally ~,,orant or the person who brou6tlit Fialistiff. hod sworn to. facts, which, if believed. bone parish ; and that on the sd of August, he was
' '44 t'' gh Bridirf.rstatsal as ohs evinced in lies i hat t, e . ~ time that they mottle directly against him—Mr. Pitcher. the celled oil by the Persecutor, rod at 11•• desire *-
tors f•• l bond
i_,.._ t battle mein ; but. e supposed i still .
d 1t at the rezent of Hilair,. were sent by direetion of Mr. Harness. Ile had Plaintiff's Ott ttttt ey, was produced for the purpose coinpattie.l him to the Hatton-garden Pulictemffice.
•.' applinifien ht ad bemade t the W•r-Oh- when, a warrant was procured for the purpose of
Mee h•.,,, tann a been I never seen Mr. Hiram. at his twother's M11e..; he of contradicting his statement.
i ilir rd. a' he knew of leis alowitcr, for his re- bed celled un hint twice at the Transport-Ogler ; Mr. Serjeant Bore ohjected to the Counsel on searching the lodgings oh' the Posoner. Ida pre.
the . el; lgist that suit return to this: entintre could suit October iheprevented the bid the part of the Plaintiff calling evidence fur the eeeded with the Baroeet. Wood. and Beads to
once in IOC). when
. P Ice h. time for the trial, and lie had eln- of conch, at which lime Mr. Heflin. stated that he purloin' orcontrailicting his own wttness.
itoeii eons toth 'Beldwin's-gardees. On the way thither the Bann
0.,„ th, , at effect. On these eronnile, he moved would call on Mr. Hill on the following day ; am' Lord Chief Jeetice Metallize') over-ruled the net
t this trial also 'should be put oil,directed him to be very diligent in his sestehtte.
t to
klind E sotto. when he served hins with the copy ofd writ ohjectiem It frequently leappeued that eitneeseo, Mr. Bartlett, the leadgfed of the house, hints(
~,,
~,,
..is,i, 4
di t.t.exatteneete—o Take three Butes oho% they came into Court, spoke very differently pointed out the room which had beets occupied by
nu the lld ofJanuary lett.
from what they bud given reason to suppose they
51 Kuhr ,Vti nct Rule in each action ;end let copies Robert Carrell, win was also • clerk is Plain-
r„.. IL., Pr°'-e.cdinea, as hitherto had, be delivered to efts office at the time the copy of the writ was left would. and completely deceived the Counsel fur wed it. and commenced their searches; while
the Prisoner, she Bironet, Wood, and. Raid
_ea-.
, ,e. . ict`t,'-i."'"ht in time. The Coert will find it Herethe party in whose vault' they
there. deposed that lie had reversers Mr. Ilitite.s.
Ice del not think it improper, where such *as the tempts which might be made at concealment by
l„., , at,„" ur proems of each actiou to be in possestion at hill master'. office, but he had taken •bII of
Wuhan,;' etre), . that evidence of a different description should
.'l''''' The AT rests to Defend tot at the Transport Office. at an ease.
be cilled.-11 )'on know. brother Best, you did the persons in the house. •He was at length allied
1...•• 16am I.llteito-Gitrenet. answered—that care reviler pesiod in the busiuess than thet mentioned ...
ri. . hov,. take" to *imply their Lordships with Itv 14,t wit
at a /vial time Mr. Dames* said,
the slime thing iu the famous horse cense." into the room, and desired' by the Baronet tonarch
a drawer iii a cheat of decimate, and haviag meet
it.: 10 Tni• ,s,:iette document. that lie would call ned settle with the Plaintiff.— hl r. Pitcher was then examined.—The substance amongst some old reg.. he foiled • gold male which
il .: •, nuke !Vial were all granted. Ile lied iIeVII with Mr. 11 trims very lately, midi.: of his deposition was, that he hail liven told by Mr. the Baronet immediately cleansed as his. At that
''' I- the intioaing cirannstaccest—lle understood that Phemaut th it hi. lite on the goods was but 51. ; time Wood and Read weee examining some mere
„ri.e A THU met; r. ?MU IPS.
": i'. 14 tu'aarr-GEti vita/. Atwell cease se-sleet Mr. Ilia; iiitemled to rehpirne liiin (the witnesa) on and that when Bruce, tin: last witness, was applied at a table is the min of the mot On being
I Nab
141°44 by No Setteent Leos, spins. the (f.-e pre.xat 'rue, end In Consequence be called to, to deliver up the property on memo of that croaa.caatemed by Mr. Roymialo, cease's' for tea