The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser.
London, England, 1810-03-29 00:00:00

Ir. Whitbread) kat' voted for the
Jones; because, after the humble
us error at their bar, he thought
enough. Ile had again to repeat
read the publication ; although lie
natant, and hail only to do the Ju-
nto man, he had not, in the few
spare since two o'clo k this morn-
iled to pay it the sante attentiiiii, as
Hon. Members oil the floor (NIG
dr. Owen.) He saw from the bulk
Burdett's pamphlet, that it would be
hint to get through-it that day, and
therefore stuck to the Hon. General's
-iginary campaign; followed him, its
dale, through all his military ans-
wer Ministers, and assist them in
their retreat. He had another eon..
against Sir Francis Burdett, be.
lad ulready noticed. He had read
I not being able to discover any
lege in that, he had put the argu.
kit, thinking that the Hou. Gentle.
iould come to nothing. When he
the House, however, lie was aito.
fend and have pointed out to him, in
things which he did nut recollect to
:tried -in the speech of the Hu-
&iet. From the unimpressive Ulan.
these messages came under his view,
pretend to pass un opinion on .
aiild lie do so till lie had con-
ratites?. If he was pressed to a
he %%Sib prepared for it, hr must, oil
feeling of a Juryman, (nod lie con-
iause in a eas? of this kind as resent-
, when fluctuating betweeu a prout of
luocence, I:an to the side of mercy, and
• the latter. There might be others
iatien, and who, as they cou►d not,
, Honourable Geotleinan, by menus
their minds, keep the two questions,
like him would wish to have the one

before they entered on the other. He
ther of the two was sufficient for a.man's
attention at one 'line. Whatever miAlit
• of that Hight flonounthle Gentle-
preasing them, he trusted he would
ippoitited. He believe.) the public had too
to have their minds diverted from

_ Expedition, by this attempt to m-
at:other object. All the Right Honour-
-111:111 could gain by the stratagem,
:'ie few hours during which the
trued. The House. cud the Honour-
had a right to call on hint for a . alin
• Resolutiou, iii a matter so deeply in.
i vileges of the former, amid the chonic-
tatter. Ile deprecated a rash and preci-
- winch thtir's would be, if they came
iit. Other Gentlemen might shrew
by voting uninformed. For himself,
hold only to do what. in honesty and
risrice, he thought right.--The Hon. Cietillcinan
, nicluded amidst ctiet of Hear, hear, dud other
marks of approbation.
Sir J.SIONET YORKS said, the Hon. Member had
allude,: to a late Member, arm, had beep appointed
a Teller of the Exch.:goer, soil he did not consider
the reau!t of that lion. Mein i we's conduct, any way
injunous to his character. This, he would taYe
that although the pre:arm questton had been el. med
a legacy, it was an excellent legacy, whether left
by a Teller of the Eccherlis a', or by a brewer of bad
porter. (These obacrrisib floi were folio melt by loud
c.i-s of /rear, chair, and take dawn the words.)
Mr. WHITBREAD rose and observed, thht what-
ever other Hon. Gentlemen might feel, as (Mein-
hers of that House, on tile present occasion, he felt
uo displeasure at the expression. What had been
stated, only affected him, when considered as a
tradesman; and he was sure the Hon. Gentleman
had uo right to say, he brewed bad porter.--(A laud
laugh, and shoats of hear, hear.)
Lord Simon consideted the language used as
unparliamentary ; and mired, r. That the words
be taken down."—(Hear, hear, hear, Chair, ('hair.)
Mr. %Vaunters') did not conceive it right to
treat the conduct of the Hon. Gelitlemon as ithouy
other than goad humour. lie would not irapote
any thing wrong, nor did he wish for the slightest
apology ; lie could discern, from the comiteuaorto
and wanner of the lion. Member, nothing was
meant by an expression which might have bees
need by any other 'Person, • in the warmth of the
moment. If the observatiou were correctly upr
plied, hr 19114 sorry he had so far deviated from
the precepts and practice of his father; however,
he invited the Hon. M tuber to order • cask, and
hr would take care it should be of the best; iu .
which lie and the electors of Citinbridgeshire might
drink the hi olth of the Teller of the Exchequer.—
(Loud lanqhing, and Hear, hear.)
Lind 111 i 'Jo% again rose to repeat the propriety
of hi. farmer motion.—(Chair„ C'hair.)
The SOF:41E11B mail, it might have been compe-
tent for any Alember to have made such a mottos'
on the words itself, hut that was rendered urine-
.-eas.:ry, from 0114 fell from the Hou. Gentle.
113$11 1,110111 they cooceruerl.
Mr. eaukt.k allowed. that the expreasioss of the
Ilea. G.-holm:to behind hini was imempemte and
liwy.—(lrr, we could not.collect the Hou. Mern-•
Ines sentiniems, from the cootiotted criers) of
(bushels, rprestitet, qtresfion.)—He really must say,
nut far more dilli..ulty than existed, was attached
Is the consideratimi of this suhject.—lflear. Ques-
Cen, griestiun J— The I loninirable Gentleman, who
stroke lost, NM said. lie would not be intimidated
late silence; so lie (Mr. C.) would my, that no irme
should iatimiefote ti into silence by their chi-
-110.. nr.--(Hear.)—Hael the arguments muril by the
nu& Baronet heen for the purpose of fair discus-
*inn. they ought to have been stated with temperance;
hat such were their violence and libellous tendency,
that the Ifon. Baronet would never have dared to
'l„,ttvt them in that House. IVtat was the question?
"thy, one which needed no long or protracted con-
snielatiori. Were they to discos+, it loin, o I.et her
they had n right to exercise thine powers and privi-
kr% which their arice-aor, had always mai mowed,
Stud hail enjoyed front all antiquity ?—(1/rnr, hear,
!,"*.)--He svati!d assert, that the simple iiiiestiiiii
',„"r the easinderat• of the Hauer ',A.—Witt-111pr
"'I had a right to commit strao4rut, fur A Coll.
tempt ? As to the Honourable Barmict. he WAS
1 "Peaking of this set in language bath repreliesi-
mile and void a taw:. 11l the proper laid on the

table, be Lad told them dint the Home had exceeded
the Ii in its of its power. If the II 111. HAM had any ob-
jection to make, any argument toadvanee, why had
he nut stated hnn.elf ro before chat House? But
what he feel pubhslieil hi that paper, he would
venture to the lion. Baronet would not hare
dared to state isiihie the walls of. that House.—
(//car, hear, hear.) Ile would amen the lan-
guege lie was Loa vain;,, in defiance of those urea-
live cheers. If the /1011. Baronet had uttered semi-
melee contained iii the erg ttttt ent published in the
paper before them, ih thin Houle, would Dot he
have been called to order? would he have been per-
mitted to have expressed such 'sentiments? Ile
appealed to the Speaker, if he had spoken of the
warrant as an "instrument, this thing, smi genera;
this piece of uNscaled paper, signed by the Speaker,'
within the House of Common*, for he was nut
iog of the warrant of .the Speak m-, -but the
warrant of the United Commons of the Kingdoms"
of Great Britain and ; would not, he re.
prated. the Speaker have called him to artier, and
reprimanded him for his coudect ? Who wits the
Hon. Baronet? Was lie a person of whom they hail
to form their opinion ? Was he not oue of those
persons, whose sentiments were generally known,
end of which none in that !louse could he i,gtio-
rant hear.)—Needed the Hon. Members
opposite to doubt and require time to weigh their
decision, about a mem whose sentiments hal been
-expressed by On so many occasions? (Hear,
hear. Order.)—He considered hitnself in the dis-
charge of his duly in preserving the dignity of the
House, and humbly maintaining the privileges of
the House and the dignity of the Clair.—(A
lento.)—Had the Hunourable %intim, he would
will say, inserted that language within the House,
which he lied published in that obnoxious paper,
the Speaker himself would have considered it his"
bounden duty to have called him to order. -Unless
Gentlemen were prepared to change the whole
system of their loug•establisheil privileges and
rights, he could nut perceive how there could be •
question of doubt. What room was there for de-
lay? Look at the publication, and every man must
allow, that • more audacious or daring libel was
never levelled against • the independence and dig-
nity of the House of C 0031120110. He would, for
a moment, request their attention to the last
extract from The Weekly Register, where the
lion. Baronet has represented the House of Coin-
ninns " inflated with their high-blown fanciful ideas
of majesty, and, tricked out in the trapping of
royalty, think privilege and protection beneath
their dig,ity, asinine the sword of prerogative, and
lard it equally over th e King sad the people." Now,
he never understood that the House of Commons
had ever usurped any part of rot atty. nor did be
know of any ensigns amongst them, except the
mace on the table. There was one passage he
would notice before he suit down, as reflecting
strongly, awl in the mod extraordinary way,
upon the proceedings of that Hmise. It was
there intimated, that the House of Comments was
" in danger of ineurrieg the sentence of Sr.
Paul upon the insolent avid tyrannical High
Priest, who had ecimmauded him to Ise stricken 111
his own defence:—God shall smite thee, thou whited
IA laugh on Me opposition side.) Was that a
decorous laugh? Was it nut indecorous, not Gaily
tn'thre House, but to the words of sacred writ? It
witi stated, " God shall smite thee thou whited
wall: For thou fittest to judge Inc after. the law,
arid emornandest me to be smitten coutrary to the
law." This sentence was applied to the House of
Comninone. (No, nu, No, front the opposition side.)
He would inaintaiu that such was the construction'
of the passage fie quoted, that if they continued
the practises condemned in this argument, they
hail to expect the denunciation of St. Paul. Ac-
cording to tie opinions delivered by the Hon. Gen-
tlemen opposite, it appeared that even n week
would nut be sufficient to consider the merits of
this subject; they must, according to such doctrine*,
adjourn the debate, de die is diem. Such were his
ideas of the principles of the Constitution, that he
considered them enshrined in the House of Com-
mons. As to the direct potut in discussion, be was
at a loss to estimate the validity of any doubt on
the subject, nor had there been 41 doubt expreseed,
exr ept by the Noble Lord opposite (Folkstone,)
and he did not believe the merit of the question
was affected by a solitary doubt.

Sir SAKOeL Rositt.tr —‘l If ever. Sir, there was
a question involving our own dignity ; if ever there
was a ptestion in which was comprehended the in-
terest and attention of the nation at large ; it is the
one under our cooviderition. We are culled upon
t Ipronounze our opinion, as Judges; but we most
recollect that we arc judges in our own cause. It,
therefore, ill becomes us to give way to any feelings
of anitnosity, hut to weigh every consideration, and
judiciously decide upon the whole. At the same
tune l must say. I have doubts upon the subjects
under our investigation. These doubts I have en-
tertained through a long examination into the prin-
ciples of natural law and equity, from the loafs"-
sioual habits of my life, and from those particular
studies which have been familiar to my control-
',lotion. With respect to all which has been al-
leged coocerning the dignity of this House, I do
not think we add to its consequence by constantly
bluing forth the power of our own privileges.
Many Honourable Gentlemen have chosen to ex-
press their cou..age iu a way not altogether consistent •
with proprie.y. I confess 1 do not coincide with
them Ili the expression of such feelings. We ought
to consider these are not times for the assertion of
such I ingusge; and, lorsides. we ought to bear in
mind the long practice of the country, !upon the
principles we now question. It may be remembered
the general meetings which OH a late occasion took
place, where public thanks were bestowed upois per-
sous who had acted io oppositiou to the majority of
this House. There are reasons for the postponement
ofthis measure. which, I should trust, will induce
those Hotionrahle Geutleuieu who press for imme-
diate decision, to consider this rase in another point
of view. 1 do not perceive the estravagrat con-
struction which has been put upon dist extract of
the piper relative to the Bill of Rights b,consing a
Bill of Wrongs. (Here the Honour:dile Member
read the passuAe alluded to.) It is strange we
should not, iu the present instance, where the put.-
licstion of a libel founds our furl yr precrtiitigs,
inquire more minutely into the deti;iitinn of a libel.
Igoe, has any Honourable Gentleman clearly bliewn
that the publication itself is a bud egaiust 'be

riwise of Commons ? For what is the goe,tioe ?
Why, whether the piper to dues mot eau-
Lis what i,.iim4:wilt to deaommate it to bee I bel.

I must emef,sl,, l eutelria a ilwitit with respect to
its being a Mod. Ido not mean to say tt is no: a
libel, but I have my own doubts on ilse
—lt is our duty to direct our attention to both
the forum and the Metier of this publication.--.
No one can deity, that the 011)mi:talon is lithe
to discussion, provided it were a temperate and ar-
gumentative appeal to the underatunding of man-
kind. 'He would admit, that passage., written
with a totally opposite spirit might, an that a--
count, be litiGle to the charge of being a libel."—
(Here some Mterr option took place from a uoisc
ou the Ministerial aide.)—Said Sir Samuel " I
have. no objection to slim those Honourable
Geutlernen every deference ; I dare say they have
made up their own minds, and they, have very great
legal knowledge on the question. and I should be
hippy if they would communicate that knowledge
—(A tough.)--Now, what is the principal-sta:e. •
meta contained in this paper? Why, that the pro-
ceeding of this House, on a late occasibu, was
contrary to Maggie C'haela. The Hon. Bart. as-
serts that as a position, and he goes dii to the Ms-
cu,sion of its being borne out by fact. This is cer-
tainly a made of discussions; and. God forbid. that,
'in this country, there shirwld not be a freedom of
discussion. With respect to the last passage,
marked by the lions Mover, he did not consider it
so winch libellnaa, se ,was destitute of sense.
(The lion. Winber Alorllthe passage ar4verted to.).
How can the Commons. at this noir, have it in
their Ismer to lord it over the King as.,l dir people.?
The first passage had also been e:msolcied as very
important
' A question of nu less importance than this, wbrilser
our liberty be full Is be secured by the lies of our fore-
fatbr,r, or be to he at the almulute mercy of a puff of cur
fellow.satikeir, collected tuietber by mesas which it it is not
uccesaary fur me to deceribe r' •
To get at the meaning of this parissge. if Woos as
libellous, there must be as billeted% There was, •
some time ago, a cave of libel, in the Court of
King's Bench. and the Meannig • not being ex-
pressed, but remaining for inference to construe, it
was laid down there must be ao tattrado. There-
fore it appears dear, when this Howie proceeds to
puinilt a man f3r a libel, they do so; without giving
the individual an opportunity of being heard.. Ido
not wish to allege this is not the, course of this
House; but if the adjournment is not now agreed
to, why was not the question agitated in its fi,st
stage ? Why was it adjourned till this day ? If the
Hon. Gentlemen will take a longer period to con-
sider this subject, I have no doubt they will alter
their opinions in consequence." The Mem-
ber concluded by anitnariverting opal' the decla-
rations of courage. which he comidered very im-
proper in the present-times.

The CuancEr.t.na of the EXCHEQUER was sur-
prised that any Hunourable Member could, after
hearing all which had realised, feel any doubt upon
the subject. Both sides have admitted that the pre-
sent question is oue of the greatest importance ; but
at the same lirpe some lion. Gentlemen have been
unlined to think that the Wulchereo Expedition is
of more importance; and he agreed with them that.
the inquiry into the Expedition, in order to arca.
tain the conduct of His Mujesty's Minister, .is of
very great importance; but important as he did
consider the inquiry, still that was a charge against
Ministers, whereas the present questiou contain. en
scensation against this House of Commons. The
Hon. Member opposite (Mr. Whitbread) had said
a good deal about the cha!iter of accidents, as if he
(Mr. Perceval) had seized the present instaiice by the
way; nay, lie bad described hi,rn in the last surge,.
with the halter about his neck.—(4lairgh.)--wßut
he had no hesitation in telling the Hon.
man, that he looked forward ttilte.decisiou pend-
ing on thil Inquiry, with as much anxiety, and as
much confidence. us any other Member of that
House. —(Hear, licur.)—For it Would tend to re.
move those erroneour notions which had been enter-
tained respecting the conduct of His Majesty's Mi-
nister.. lie contended, that no other mode had been
resorted to in his own case, but what had been put..
sued in the present. He had no hesitation in saying.
that fie to the form and the matter of this publi-
cation, they were, undoubtedly libellous. That a
man should enjoy free discussion was right; but
should it be permitted that a man should appeal
front the decision of that House to his constituents,
and call upon them to resist that decision ? Lan-
guage thus used, he should not have thought there
would have been much occasion to convince his
Hon. and Learned Friend (Sir S. Illoinilly) was
completely libeller' Every man moat so consider
this appeal to his Constituent'. (Mr. P. here read
the passage.) It commenced with a declaration,
with a oistinct atlegiation, that an order of the hlonse
of Commons was 01211ITAry to Magna Chnrta ; and
then he proceeded to call upon his Consittnents to
resist the proceedings of that House. Perhaps it
would be said their resistance was to be by argu-
ment, but he would lease others to form their con-
jectures. (A laugh I He next adverted to the
reasoning of the HouoisTable Baronet, in those
passages, where he states the objectadesired by those
who support the doctrine of reforming Parliament.
The next paragraph of which he coinPlaiued„
was the following
" The principle, Fella... Miami, far shield you are now
contewdiag, is the same principle for which the people. of
England have cm:tendril, Guru the earliest ages. Itiwak this
saute great principle which wax attacked by Charles thilfinit,
is the measure or ship.nioney ; when, see.,, the people of
Euelsod, and an unruirupted House of Connuoux, ..lowed
lb. coatest, a rootord which ended in the imp r isminieat, the
trial, the coodetitnotion, and execution, of that ill•adviard
King; the self-snow principle it u is that a as so daringly
violatail by his is., James the Second, sad fw which violative
be was °Wird to doe Crum the jest indiginitioo of the people.
It was, at all times. the pride of the country, that the people
were secured freret the upprawriaas or mini. power; sod if
us sow abandou the principle, the briaht days at tag-
tad's glory will owl h, lb. night other &space."
It concluder) with observing, that—
"As their forefathers liAd saute grim-risaged,Krroeative
hide his head, and [wilco in pictes his sharp :will massy
sword, they, thole sints Minh! nut he afraid i.ienter 1.. e
lists with aadefirreil Privilege, .sassing the powere el- Preto-
prim"
The inference from all this'll:as. time the writer
lied called upon the people of &glutei to mast the
doctrine upon winch Mr. Jones was contissed, find
to enter the lists with the 11;averomeat, in the same
way that their iniceetore had tiorsa..--i( titer, hear.)
—Conld any man doubt. that ►he stainer it, well
as the matter. wod bbellouss sad aatouutil; to a

gross breach of the privileges of tlist Milne ? An-
other seutence, w!bich he (the Chmivelloe of the Ax-
cltrqu.•r) .601.1 woo the omit:lading st vi •e
of the Ittter, which <)4,e...erased the dtrii‘iol'i of the
Howe, in the eoutontt•.l of Mr. Gole Jones, a-•••
a A Most sou: moat &tote of power, owl the Ino:t .13-I,lcre
oyes of on encru.Nloscuts oivms *lO rigid,' col Korai:sea a
Euglishnico."

Ciotti any thing, he would ask, he more calcu-
lated to bring dill House solo disrcpme Could
any thing be mop- Iiii••11ons--nay, could :toy person
have a doubt that it was libellous in thesextrerue ?
(Hear, frost the Oipositiost.) • If, indeed, these was
any person whod id, an adjournment for ;meet. would
,carcely work any d,tfcr..nce in an opinion so con-
trary to all reasonal.lc prestrinptiol and inference.
There were many other pass ;;es, *Lich he would
not trouble them with enumerating, but the sense
of them, he bad- no hesitation to state, was tire.
quivocally to represent Parliament an acting in
contradiction to the Law and Constitution of the
country. The Hon. Gentleman !Mosel!, who hail
moved the adjournment, confessed, that he had no
doubt as to the libellous stature of some passages,
but he wished to be satisfies, as to the disr ; there
were others who were Inximia to be informs.' as to
the fact, but it was easy to answer both. Tne Hon.
Gentleman had attempted to draw a distinctioo
between breach of privilege mid tilid, iii the in-
stance of publication, which he would not agree in.
There might, he would admit, he hrercises of pri-
vilege, which were not libels; bat he could sot
conceive any publication, reflect.sig upon the
,House of Commons, to as to amount to a brew:, of
privileges that was tint a libel. Another seuteuce
went to represent them as a body " dressing
themselves oust in fanciful prerogatives, imperi-
-1 oils alike to tbe King and the people." Having
said so much stain the 84,1, he should now proeeeit
to the lie di the questiou ; this was to lie decided
by a reference ti authorities. The i.oint which
gave rise to the letter of Sir Francis Burdett, was.
whether the H .use had a right to commit a
person not a Member ? in short. whether Mr.
Gale Jones's committal was legal ? Supposing
that it was not, the Honourable Baronet might
have moved for a re-consideratioo, and discus.
bed the question ever !Again in the House; hat
he doubted whether he lied a right to appeal
. to his coust:tueuts, especiaily in the manlier sit
which he had done it. after a grave and deliberate
decision of that House. There...ere Tinny cases
on the Journals to establish such o right ; there •
was the case of Mr. Hill, a Member of that
House, nod of Mr. Trollops., who was not a Mem-
ber, but was committed notaithitanding. by the
authority of that lions, ; iti 1701,1 case of that kind
was referred to a Connnittee ; the Commiitee was
'appointed to inquire into the rights and privileges
of the House, and, ow the motion of a Noble Lord,
the right. and privileges of the subject were to be
taken into cnasideration ; also the Resolution of

that Committer. They-Should all bear in their
minds, it stated, that to contend that the House
had not a right to commit persons who were not
Members, 'would tend to the subversicti of the
principles upon which it stood. They had num-
berless mar:ices to prove it. In the ease of Oliver
and Crosby, the right of the House of Commons to
eoinsnit for breach of privilege. hart.besen recognised
by the King's Bench and the House of Lords. 14-,
begged to call their attention to an opinion of Lord
Kenyon's, who had stated, that whenever factious
men would attempt to overturn the government,
they would begin the work by caluttmesting the
Courts of Law, and both Houses of l'srtiament ;
he would appeal to them, whether that time was
not now come I' The House would do weft to re-
member, that Mr. Gale &met was committed to
prison by an unanimous vote ; -and if, in the case
of a member, they were to beritate more than
in his, they would be guilty of improper par-
tiality ; if any distinction was to be draws be-
tween them, instead of being in favour of their
ow* hleinber, it must make against him ; it would
be welleto compare the wore of the two offences.
Gale Joneshad published 811 account of a discussion
which, he had said, and would admit, amounted to
a gro-• offence; hut lie hail no hesitation to say,
that, compared with the offence upon which the
qttestion had now arisen, it was comparatively
trifling. 'they 'should not give Sir Francis Burdett
such a triumph, they, should insiatain then rights
and privileges, the ris.!hts and privileges of the peo-
ple of England ; to do otherwise, would be to sub-.
ject themselves to the charge of irjii.fce and pusil-
lattimity, it would-be 4, sic ,wurieri mei." They
should not .astunit to be trampled upon—they
should proceed to do Carle duty temperately, con-
siderately, and impartially.—(Hear, /war, iron
die Opposilion.P—And if such was their determina-
tion, they would concur in the Resolution of the
Hon. Gentleman wader the pillery, as essential to
the maintenance ultbeir dignity.
Lord FOLILSTOPIC :460. that he was 'sore the
House would not be induced to ate to the reso-
lution, by the speech which was last delivered to
flterre4l•but that, on the contrary, they would vote
for the iidjounitnent. The Right Hen. Gentle-
twin was desirous that they should proceed imme-
diately, arid yet when he proceeded to the examine.
tion..be proved that be was an far mistaken as to
•requiee 11 little *me himself for an acquaintance
with the subject.- He had called upon them to di-
cide gravely, 'considerately. and coolly ; end it ore
for that eery reason- that they should avoid going
into it hotly, prematurely, and pasainnately-.!
(Hear, ketef) They had heard grave authoritiss
upon the subject, such as no man could doubt.
The Right- Honourable Gentleman had involved
Gale Jones in the subject. though the Honours.
Me Gentleman had separated them. Ile (Lord
Folkstone) agreed, that they should not he
separated ; for in order to decide upon the poi.-
lication of Sir Francis Burdett, they should chande
upon the principte which he had rpiestioned. in
referring to the precedents, the first 0118 quoted
by the Right Hon. Gentian in, was that of Hall;
but that was nee of such a sia.ure, and drawn Nisi
such a time, that they should not be very ready to
adopt it ; in that ease, the individual was not only
committed to the Tower. but fitted; so that if they
resolved to follow the pre (Arlo, they should *eke
it all, and not nroceed upon selected unil particul
parts of it. ( Ilear, hear.) Tic neNt orccede.it
which he had referred, was that of the
how, which was sent to a Committee; the Cul. tet-
tee sat open the rights and privileges of that Louie ;

Mies. Hs. (11r.
of Mr..lones ; bea
conical:ion of hia error at
bun punishedenough. I
not he had not read the p
bad no office to attend, an,
nes of a cominnii man,
It
Amin he bad to spare since
log, been enabled to pay it
either of the lion. Skull
Brand and Mr. Owen.)
of Sir Francis Burdett's psi
impossible for him to get t
he had therefore stuck
Craufuril) imaginary tam'
well as he *Ns able, thron)
:ewes, to cover Minion
iosking good their retreat.
•i!aiot to snake against S
ides what he had ulready
is letter, mod not beim
',reach of privilege in that
mot in his pocket, thiiikin
motion would come
• or Joan to the House,
„mined to hear read and ha.
tins argument, things whic
hare heard untried -in
:mutable Baronet. From
tier 41 which these passag
).e could not pretend Ie
4,a, nor would he d
Weed the context. if
deciaiou before he sista tire
the common feeling of a
siderul the lisue in a ea:
a Jury), w hea II mot
i;adt and Moot:et:me, lean
primuuoce fur the latter.
ti;e same situation, and
like the Right Honourab
if the cells in their minds
seisrate, they like him we
.!;,posed of before they en
ass suie either of the two
undivided attention at one
Le the motives of that H
Mall 13 thus pruning the
Le disappointed. He lid
nitteli sense to base the
toe Scheldt Expedition,
trodace another objects
able Geutleinan could
could be Vie few hot
lichee continued. The
able Baronet had a right t
and delberate Resolution
%Ann! the pri vilegra of it
ter of.the latter. lie (lei
pate decision, which thti
to it this night. Other
their boldness by voting u
be would be hold only tc
reater, he thOught nigh
s included amidst cries a
marks of approbation.