The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser.
London, England, 1821-02-02 00:00:00

mi • wertoolf.4o4 the ..lisiu,temilkno to that
House, ug the tout and teatime with which
some Getstkesea treated • the sobject now—now
that tier ißillted 'been ithsbwo. oat by the .Lords.
efe.cpoi.onrial , hpd ,rno, right -to refer -to . whet,
tied ins pOit pines to their owe opium.* ,
they had a right, sod to proceed open them : hat
did they do so?.-sad 'they all for a new trial ?
No such thin; they took hold of what passed in
another pher to twite that prejudice which be
would from the Vlslds IPeeluPlifor be isgiaed iq may. I
iug wee the only, object of Government in mow
meaci og the peoceedusge.—(Heer.) -esOt her grounds
also were ,dwelt . epee, and verbal criticisms were
urged sigeingt her Majesty. The Honourable
Alderman had removed t imputation rgspectjeg
unpaid accoupts, aid now, forsooth, the degree of
splendour with which an individual .was•littiag in a
foreign capital, was, by the condescenstioa of a
Noble Lord, brought before the House. He wished
the Noble Lord would look • little more to the
principles of British justice. He, tar his part, most
say, that us the supposed guilt of her Majesty was
stet to be made the grouod diuminishing the grant,
it would Ise bat right if Giatlemen would keep
their sentinstuts..withiu their own lireests, and set
increase the agitation which already prevailed in
the pyblic mind ou the subject. But it seemed
her ajesty bad .ronsesitted.a new offence by. the
Message sent down to the House. Her Majesty
must, at all events, be allowed to be consistent:
fair before she arrived in this country she hod made
her claim to he vestoredta the Liturgy, and the
Mark Laird meet remember that on the first in-
terview that took place time sehaimion was put
forward as a legal right; sad, again, in that House,
en the occasion of the Hors. Member for &amber's
niation. But the Minim'', never approached the
subject till obliged a few nights ago, when the sub-
jet wee displayed with such. blaze of light by the
note Member for Ozford, that it was difficult
again to approach it. Now the Hon. Member under
the gallery produced a Resolution of that House
its the reign of Quteu Anne, mid argued from it as
if there were no diffeteuce between insertiou and
moimion. The British public would have had
no objection if all she Royal Family bed been
preyed fur. The argument, in fact, proved no-•
thing on the rielestiett before the House, and only.
proved the existence of • principle which he had
from the first observed with regret, that the weaker
party was always in the wren. With respect to
Addresses, there was pee which had been before the
House that night which he censured in the strongest
tient*: not that be meant to do so : but would
they iipply a less indulgent, a less honest con-
sideration to the language. of the Queen, who
wns • loaner and unacquainted with our tongue.
Nothing .could be more objectionable than the
language of that Address, which it was stated
in the Gazette bed been received by his Majesty
with the most gracious approbation. It was not to be
argued seriously—it was too absurd to suppose that
her Majesty woe concerned Welty plot, unless,
deed, she were deprived of meow : that alone would
occoont for end excises such au act.
Mr. Wtessor agreed with the Hon. and Learned
Gentleman in the impropriety of referring to what
bed pasted in the other House, but es in giving an
'Pinion on the
,proceeding be could not say it au-
thorised any one to pronounce guilty, neither was
it a verdict of acquittal. He considered the sum
Originally proposed as the most proper, and must
dissent from the motion of the Hon. Member for
Surrey, as it could lead to no practical result, but
It-lust only aggravate *hoer feeling. which it was au
everlaceoUnt ea deairable should he heeled.
.Sir Tepee's Ael.een said, that one reason for
approving the sans originally proposed was, that
it neither impaled
.guilt nor declared innocence. It
should he remembewed, that had it not been for
her Majesty'. Selltelegiel nand generosity in 1814,
abe would come before the House as possessing
ass income of 50,000 f. • year, and he could not
consent to take advantage of an act of generosity
to the amigo( the generous individnal.
Mr. Fosses spoke, but front the noise in the
gallery the precise tenor of his words could not be
collected. We understood him to ask, bow could
they grant her ore. ,sty the money and say, as it
been said eleewhete, " Go thy way and sin no
more P'
Mr. BEOUGHAE said, that in the absence of his
Hon. and Learned Friend Mt. De 1111 l an had left
the House), he must say, that the question put
by the [lnn. Member who spoke last, arose from
as gross and false • statement of the weaning of
his Hon. staid Learned Friend as he ever recollected
to have heard. He did not impute that falsehood
to the Hon. Member who had rat down. He knew
from whence he heard it. The dross had been
taken from the ore.
Mr. Foettett explained.
Sir F. BLAKE said, that although he hoped lie
should always be able to ;newer for any words
which he spoke in that House, yet lie could not
be responsible for words which conveyed • different
meaning front thou: lie had used. He hail been
made to say, that if the Ministers should have
adopted their late proceedings, they would have
provoked a revolution : what lie did say was, that
as this was the age of revolutions, lie should not be
much surprised if the advisers of the Crown should
promote one. He did lint mean to charge his Ma-
jesty's Ministers with intending to violate the first
law of nature—self-preservation—as they would
lolibtleu in such a case be the first sufferers, lint
It might be said, without any disparagement to their
unless they paid more atientiou to theinte-
rests and feelings of the country. With regard to
le .ums proposed, ill-trail of a smaller he should
',aye been inclined to move • larger sum for her
Majesty, had not the situetiou of the country in-
duced him to suspend hi: iiiteutittu. The expla-
nation given by an H 0,,. Alderman, that her
Majesty pled her hills every month, ass an ex-
ample well worthy of imitation in other quartets.
The Hon. Member concluded with derlaring his
approbation of the Noble Lord's motion.
Thr I.ti-port was tin-u read a second time. and on
the (meshing being put " fur enabling his Majesty
to grind 60,0001. to her Majesty during her life,"
she gallery was cleared, but after strangers had
nilhdluen, we understood the original motion was
carried without a division. On our re-admission to
the gallery we found
Sir Hester PARNELL on his legs, moving for
• return of the official and real value of Irish manu-
factures imported into England, and of British