The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser.
London, England, 1824-11-13 00:00:00

weyor.ee takes it from me, that forget, is known to be a misprision
ss fekey, bat could l not afterwares sue for my rent ?
.tit. Sergeant VAUOUAN—The title to the stock is indisputable;
die d.vidend is oriy an escrescenee upon the stock and therefore not
411putable. The plairtitf migh! be indicted, if guilty of any eri
MIMI act ; but crimes and civil rights should not be thug con-
•Sonnaed. If there were any writ hens to the conduct of the felon,
it athountel to eompound!ne Nary. But would it be any answer
•:t a thall.t the Old Bailey, to nay that a subsequent assent justi-
fied a preVioas forgery ? Certithily not. The finding of the Jury
,e this ease auts br no mem, iitioet.Yet u to the IIIIICI1t; they found
ro aunt, but airreiy a concealmcrt. Tt.is CRI4e, no doubt, was of
• great magnitude to a pabite bode, who arced u.len liable to be ins-
yalad upon, but it •;t4 mach tiltei that the responsibility should
lie on them, thar on wit'thri.hisle. After what fell fmen the Court,
he fe:t he teed say'no to and cresting that he had fulfilled hie
ety to his client. he ahottid wait to hear what was urged by the
1.41.5 T aide, satisfied that the 'verdict wotilit not be disturbed.
Me. Sergeant T.conv, for the Bank, "Amended that the action
Sr this case was not brought for refusirg the flansfy-s, but fer per-
intthig the truster to be made by !WSW unauthorised person; that
its stuck wae lost thereby to :he plaint•lf; and then the declare-
eimi thus tessellates-- by wears where-of the plaintiff has been de-
prived of his 'tacit." It avoid be sufficiest for this day's sign-
t-ent to say, thst the fits of the race did nut phew that any stork
w-s !ast, 1.; c.insequerre of such an unauthorised transfer. The
stock wu never demanikal by the pheintit!'—ro refusal to give it
Nist set forth ot proved • the allegations in the first and third counts
were that stock was lost, but those were not supported either in law
cc in fa.t. It would be an improper conclusion of law to say that
stock we. lost ; aed, in fact, there was nothing by which the Court
coalit see that th • s:ock did no: belong to the plaintiff. Ills only
siemet d vaster the dividert‘e.
I;be Colt, .ft: evict appear to arctic on the fret and
third ccuats ; but the second and fourth assuthe that stock was
standieg :n his name.
Mr. Sergeant ravel'—He was rrt going to .he that the stock
'easiest; and as to the trm,ter these were no nieans of 'hewing
yatst its effect might be.
Mt. Justie Cii\ZE.LLe—Vra appear to say that co damage op-
pears under the hot and third euants—that is to say, special
damage.
Mr. Sergeant TADDY—Fo. It was for the other side to prove
say and what damage, by itch unanthenised transfer.
Mr. Jalitee IteeA truer—Could you disprove any damage if
necessary? The brte Butt the plaintif was deprived of
its dividends aril other y ; do you call that, or not, a damage ?
Mt. Sergeant Taunt—We wish, say Lord. to argue the ease
here as we would in Error, and to inert to pol.lti yee.etly in issue
eetween the parties.
Mr..Tustire Gat e.—The ennelading words of the passage in
which the damage is ell-r.! net thiis—•• and the said tiovernor
a. d Cioupary ue 'lle Er.gland have wholly neglected
it dwy. aid rei•--d at pay all mach thrnautia and profits
:eve accrued i: stock had remuined in the rerre of the
A:I, and fed rot teen transferred.- This was the eon-

wol!ci I;

c

:;Ligt:hrlt TADr.!:

r..rod
L- •

:!,anyi..n;, :!,:••:r.t,

-W".1% • ".

of
trtit I

. :,•: a