The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser.
London, England, 1825-03-03 00:00:00

P.4I:LIAMENTARY INTEhLIORNCR.

• nocsg OP LOADS, WZDKE2Dei, MARCH 2.
CATHOLIC CLAIMS.
The Bishop of SAlAilillitY presented a petition from the
Archdranni and Clergy of Sarum, praying that the House would
grant no further concession to the Catholics.—Laid an the table.
°tithe motion of Lord BEXLEY, the Annual Indemnky Bill,
the Twenty Millions Exchequer Bills Bill, and the Transfer Aids
Bill. were read a second time.
The House then adjourned.
HOUSE OF COMMONS, Wens's:wee, Manele I.
MANCHESTER AND LIVERPOOL RAIL-ROAD BILL.
General tfASCOYNE moved the order of the day for resuittiug
the adjourned debate on the second reading of the Manchester and
Lverpool Rail-read Bill.
Mr. J. MACDONALD rose to present a petition against the
Bill, 'when
Ilse SPEAKER observed, that as the original question was off
the resumption of an adjourned debate, it certainty was competent
to the Hen. Member to move the bringing up of the petition. ; and
in that manner put off the second reading of the Bill, which might
be resumed to-morrow, or at any other time.
After some further desultory conversaticn,
Mr. MACDONALD consented to withdraw the petition, on
the understanding that he should he at liberty to present it after
the second reeding of the Bill, if that should take place.
On the question being put that this BB be now read a second
time,
Sit JOHN NEWPORT rose and said, he wished to submit a
few observatiorni oat thonresent Bill to the consideration of the
House. He stood there wholly unconnected either whir Canal
Coterpaniis or Railroad Companies, and had it, therefore, in his
power to offer a'disisterested opinitm on the sultject. It must 1)2
admitted that it was =misery, in proportion to the increase and
extension of oortmensnercial interests, to afford additional facilities
lo the tmisfer of tonutiodities. What might have been adequate
to list papaws short time back, even a year or two ago, was not
aowsufficient; so -catch had the trade anitraffic of the country
• Spienasea with= tffist period. .The present plan was proposed fur
tbe purpose re affording additional accommodation to a port when
-11/O commerce had principally increased. It was not a wild and
beised,)iis eaneulation, but a measure brought forward by the corn-
ellircial wealth of Liverpool and Manchester. He understood it
tad been asserted by the Proprietors of the Liverpool Canals that
they were ready to transmit goods at an equitable rate. It was not
enough to say so. and fie did not wish to constitute thanithe judges
of what sues or what was not a fair charge by leaving the monopoly
in their hands. The House should give every assioance to an at-
tempt to facilitate the con veyanceof commodities, connected as that
lees pith our prosperity and greatness as a commercial country.
He felt no dlfEcolty in saying, that he spoke the sentiments of his
constituents, and the Irish manufacturing and commercial interests
at large, in giving his stipport to a measure which would go to
behetit teat country = well as England. As the countries were
Welted it would be well that the mutual benefits of the union
should be extended to them, and.every facility afforded to the trade
-of each.
Mr. GREEN would oppose the second reading of the Bilt.
There were already three canals between Liverpool and Mane
Chester, carried on by rival Companies. No additional facilities
to the conveyance of goods were in his opinion necessary, and
certainly no advantages to be derived Iran the proposed rail-road;
that would at all compensate for the private injury and public ex-
pense attendant upon it. The Honourable Member proceeded, as
we understood, to advert to the localities of the intended road, and
in doing so mentioned one piece of ground which it would require I
a RUM of fri,oool. to purchase. In another part it would be neces-
sary to cut the railroad through the estate of a gentleman,which was
already bounded upon one aide by a canal, and on the other by the
high road. He contended that the advantage, if any, likely to
result from the mad, was not sufficient to compensate for the heavy
loesesond.prieatiotis to which it must necessarily subject numerous
indivhdosta
Mr. if USK/SSON, like the Right Hon. Baronet opposite, was
not in:awed io either the Rail-road or Canal Companies. He
would consider the measure as a public man, and would support or
oppose the measure according as it repeated to him likely to ad-
van= or retard public convenience. The Bill should have his vote,
net simply because it was a Bill to empower a Company to con-
struct a rail-read in preference to a canal, but because he thought
it wook; he serviceable to the commercial interests of the country.
He lino no predilection for one mode of conveyance more than
another. except so far as it afforded greater facilities to the trailer=
of commodities. He had co wish that this should turn out a prat-
able concern to the projectors, but he did hope it would prove a
waiusble public advantage. The subscribers had not originated
this plea with a view to individual profit upon the capital embarked
in the undertaking, but for the general advantage of the trading
and manufacturing community. The scheme originated with the
principal merchants and manufacturers of Liverpool and Man-
chester. They bad adopted as' a regulation, that no individual
should be allowed to hold more than tea shares, and certainly the
profit likely to result from so few shares could form no object to
capitalists of their respectability. When he (Mr. Huskisson) had
been applied to by those parties for his support, he candidly in.
formed them he could not gise it to the measure except upon one
condition. That condition wee, that a limitation should be placed
on the amount of' dividends and profits to accrue from the capital
Invested: they at once, and with the greatest candour, concurred
in the propriety of the proposition, and stated themselves willing to
limit the dividends upon She capital to 10 per cent. ; or, if tee
House should thick fit to require it, to fire. Their object wadi=
the -I concern into a profitable speculatioe.er
eMept •

to earn projected
derive personal advantage, . inasmuch as they, in common
with she trading community, "would be benefited in their com-
mercial interests. The Honourable Member for Lancaster had
' stated. that there were already three canals, which were sufficient
for all the purposes of trade in that part of the country. He had
stated a variety of other reasons. But perhaps it would be better
to let the Bill go into Committee. where those reasons could be in.
wertigatql. If the facts advanced by the Honourable Gentleman
could be established there. i t would be then time enough to reject
the Bill. He had been informed, and he believed correctly, that
the trade of Liverpool and Manchester had been delayed and
Injured through the want of sufficient modesof conveyance. The
Moue was not, perhaps, aware, that upwards of 1000 torts of
merchandise were transmitted daily by the canals between those
places. It was deeirable that this vast quantity of commodities should
be carried at the least possible ex pense,and with the greatest despatch.
The projectors of the rail-road stated that they could effect both
these objects better then could at present be done by means of the
existing canals. He did not agree in the idea which had been
advateed by the opposers of this Bill, that the projected road
valid, by dividing the tolls among a greater number of comet.
titers, go to effect an increase in their amount. The traffic be.
tween those towns had increased twofold, anti the toll might there-
fore remain unaltered, and vet aLrd sufficient remuneration to all
the Companies intere,ied. In the year 1021, but four years ago.
the experts from Liverpool aniount,rd to eleven millions and a half,
and set the House recollect, that the greater prop ation of this met-
chaadiee bad reached Liverpool by canal, not taking st all into
consideration the fuel and other articles of home consumption, for-
walled by the name nicane. Within three years of the lest men-
tioned period, namely, in 18-24, the exports had increased to nine-
teen millions. Looking at this vast increase, it was not too much
to say, that the canals could not suffer materially by the establish-
ment of a new mode of conveyance. They might be obliged, by
reason of the increased con.petition, to pay more attention to their
customers, and to make use of greater despatch. But was that to
be depreciated ? He was satisfied there was sufficient employment
both foe the three canals end the projected rail-road. If those
canal proprietors were to be protected in their monopoly, suffered to
regulate their charges according to their own notions of equity, and
refute the ceressary accinomodation to the trading community, it
might hare the worst effects upon the towns of Liverpool and 3lan-
ehneer, so as perhaps even to drive the trade to other places more
coneentently situated, and where those obstacles would not exist.
If damage was to be incurred to the property of individuals, as
must more or less be the case in undertakings such as the present,
the les was open to them, and be doubted not that the manu-
facturers and merchants of those two great towns would be willing
to affird them every reasonable compensation. Standing in that
Horse in the downy of a public man, it was seldom that he inter-
tend with the disposal of private Bilis,but he looked upon the pre-
sent as one of such importance to the manufactures and com-
merce of the country that it should have his sincere and hearty
support.
Mr. VP. PEEL said, as it had been stated that exaggerated
statements had been rut forth on both sides, he should vote for
going into e Committee e:s ascertain the facts. Many vete useful
salmons had met with opposition as great as the present Bill. It
was bit a few yearn since the introduction of a Bill for lighting a
town with gas had met with the greatest opposition in that House.
It had excited almost equal alarm and astonishment in the minds
of many, whose interests were and were not concerned in the adop-
tion of the measure. Now nothing was more general than ilhrn.
nation by gas. He thought the present plan likely to terminate in
the same way. The canal propnetors possessed no right of com-
plaint againit the projectors of the proposed railroad. It would
be equeily reasonable in the innkeepers on the Kent-road to pet.,
tion against the establiehment of 3largate packets and steam-boats.
Those individuals should not demand an exclusive monopoly, and
talk as if they possessed intuit rights in the transmission of the
merchandise of the cannery. He should vote for the second read-
lag of the Bill if reseed to a division.
3lr. PHILIPS said, mention had been made of the many mer.
chants and manure:term inteeested in the Bill now before the
Reuse. There was also a large body of landed proprietors through
whose ground it was proposed to carry the intended rad-road.
Their interests were also to be attended to. It was their argument
that a case of psibhe advantage must be shown to warrant so ex.
tecsive an interfere.ite with their property. They deny that it has
beer. sbor-n. It was asacrt,d on the other side that the measure
was one requ:ieti by the public wants, although three communica.
lions by water already existed between the towns of Manchester
and Liverpool. They further wished the House to believe, that
the diseance.whieh by carol was 50 miles, would be reduced n. 30
Gila be the Intel:Jett road. The time acw requisite to transmit
welt by water term one town to the other was also said to be 38
bouts; wherein ,t coi.ibl be tneied by the' rail-mad in one.si-ith of
the time. Mr. Sabodets; is use book he bad riblishet on the
subject, dectarrd that goods be coeveyed on rail-roads at one.
third of the expense, at water carnage, and that the manse advantege
=Wed in rail-toads over canals as existed in canals ever turnpike-
roads. He would be an advocate for rall.rowis If those tilleTtIODS
wen tree. But on u.quiry Le had satisfied himself that those

assertion' were not founded on fact. If they were, incorrect, and
the predicted admatages were not to be obtained, he thought it an
argument against the construction of rail-roads. He bad ascer-
tained the actual distance between Liverpool and Manchester by
the Mersey and Jewell canal to be 42 miles, which was to be re-
duced to 39 by some projected alterations. The time required to
make the voyage was 12 huurs instead of 36. as had been stated ;
this also, lie understood, would be reduced m ten, if no: nine, hours
by means of an improved arrargement. It was said that goods
could be conveyed on rail-roads at the rate of ten or twelve miles an
boar, while canal carriage only admitted of a progress at the rate
Of four nudes an hour. This had been repeatedly muted, and a
Jay was appointed for the purpose of demonstrating the troth of
the amnion by experiment. The result, after • fortnight's
preparation, had been, that the progress made on a rail-road with
a considerable inclination, was at the rate of 4. miles an hour, and
on the level ground only 3,1 miles. So much did the fact fall short
of the representation in that particular. The lion. edembet had
made inquiries in Lancashire from many gentlemen whom he
thought likely to give him the information on the subject of rail-
roads which he was anxious to receive. He had met with but one
individual able to afford him any itrtormation on the subject. Ile
had smeared him (51r. Peel) that there could not exist a greater
delusion, than to suppose rail-reads were superior to canals for the
purpose of conveying goods. His informant had further stated,
that he had taken the trouble to keep an accurate account of the
relative expeneca attendant upon both, and found that the expense of
a rail-road was to that of a mai in the proportion of six to
four. A gentleman had been sent to Manchester for the purpose
of surveying the intended line of rail-road. True it was, he had
been employed by the canal proprietors for that purpose, but he
believed him every way capable of teeming to an unbiarted deter-
minatioo. and was convinced he had done so. Well—on instituting
a comparison between the rail-road and canal, he returned with
the conviction that the former could not enter into competition for
a moment with the present' mode of water.turiage. The rate of
carriage would 'not be quicker. even with the aid of loco-motive
engines. He was satisfied from the result of his inquiries, that the
three cartels between Manchester and Liverpool were quite suf-
' ticient for the transport of commodities ; and on those grounds he
world oppose the second reading of the Bill.
[The Honourable Member complained several times doting the
course of his speech of the interruption he experienced from noise
in-the Hogue, which, irenuently rendered him inaudible.]
Mr. DOGIIERTY had heard assertions so opposite advanced
on the subject, that he should conceive such circumatance stone
aufficient to warrant him in voting for going hem a Committee
opoilethe'Bill. He thought the assertion on one side as good as the
aosertion on the ether. A Commieee would be best enabled to ass
certain in which of the jarring statements the facts of the case were
to be found. The statement of the Right Hon. President of the
Boatel of Trade proved that the interests of our principal manufac-
turing and mercantile bodies were concerned in the proposition.
He mould be disposed to think there was employment enough for
six canals and six rail-roads in that quarter of the kingdom, from
the vast amount of merchandise continually to be transmitted. The
measure appeared to be any thing but a question of private emolu-
ment with the supporters of the Bill, whatever it might be with
their opponents. It appeared to him that the mercantile interests
of this country were to a great extent involved in the Bill before the
House. In !rebind, which held coneiderable communication with
the port of Liverpool, the airasete was thought an important anti
advantageous one. Private interests could not operate at that dis-
tance. Besides he bad been instructed by several public com-
mercial bodies of the greatest respectability to support the Bill,
which should accordinfrly have the advantage of his vote.
Mr. J. 3f ACDONA LD &Muted the House the means pro-
posed to supply an alleged deficiency of accommodation to
the commercial interests of that part of the kingdom were
utterly impracticable. The House should not be mis-led by
'the hue and cry raised by the projeetoes of the proposed
scheme, or permit itself to be deceived by ex..larie statements
Of interested individuals. The President of the' Board of Trade
had talked of driving away the trade of Liverpool and Man-
cheater, by withholding the facilities neceseary to the trans-
mission of commodities. It seemed not to be in the remem-
' brut: of the House how much the trade of that part of the country
had been assisted by the exertions of the individual who had estab-
lished thine very canals. That individual (the late Duke of
Bridgewater) had, at a tremendous risk, expended every shilling he
WAS possessed of, and pledged every acre of his estates, to promote
those undertakings, which had in such an incalculable manner
benefited the commercial interests of the country. Years had
elapsed before he received any return or remuneration for the
hasard of his whole fortunes. He thought the House would do well
not to forget the conduct of that individual in their consideration of
the present Bill.
Mr. CA LUBA FT entertained the highest respect for the memory
of the Duke of Bridgewater; but he could not say he approved of
the conduct of the persons who had succeeded to the management of
his property The Member kir Caine appeared to carry his respect
for that Nobleman rather too far, when it induced him to object to
what appeared salutary and most likely schemes. There were two
reasons why he should not agree with the Hon. Member ; first,
because he believed he had a personal interest in the discussion :
and 2dly, because his own arguments had proved the necessity of
going into a Committee on the subject.
Mr. BROUGHAM—If he had before entertained a doubt on
the subject, would have been convinced by the speech of the Hon.
Gentleman of the necessity of sending the present Bill to a Com-
mittee. The proposition was an important one—here were Canal
Companies professing to convey goods quick and cheap—here was
'another mode of conveyance, which, it was asserted, would transmit
them roticker end cheaper. Who that had any regard for the com-
mercial community, or the least respect for common sense, would
say.—we will not entertain your proposition, or give you the oppor-
tunity, of proving what degree of credit is to be attached to it ? He
trusted that when this Bill should be submitted to • Committee,
gentlemen composing it would not adopt the general practices of
Committees oa private Bills, and turn the affair into a job. He
hoped the Committee would prove an exception to the ordinary
practice, and that Members would not vote on one side because
Mr. Somebody intetested in railroads had solicited them, or tan the
other side, from a desire to please Mrs. Somebody else, the wife of a
great canal proprietor. He entreated that when appointed, they
would listen to the witnesses, and hear Counsel, and patiently and
regularly attend the sittings of the Committee, and not act ss the
Committee did to which he had alluded some nights ago, and
before which he had had the honour to attend in his professional
capacity. Ile (Mr. Brougham) had appeared before that Com-
mittee (it was his first introduction to the House), and when the
evidence was given in, one portion of the Committee attended,
who, lie believed, were convinced by it. At the next sitting
he had to argue the ease, when another set of Members,
who had not keen there on the former day, but who. nevertheless.
had come to an opposite conclusion on the evidence which they had
not heard, came down and decided the matter against hint. If
that practice were to prevail in the present instance, he frankly
told the House he should follow the example set him by a great and
benevolent man now no more in that House, he meant Ale.
berforee, and move that the House do adopt a Resolution the direct
contrary to that of the Committee, be the decision what it might.
He hoped the practice to which he had thoeght it necessary to
allude, proceeded not so much from corruption as a certain careless-
ness prevalent in such matters, which nevertheless was only less
culpable-than corruption. In supporting the proposition to go into
' Committee on the present Bill, he was far from throwing any
stigma on the deceased Nobleman, whom he would characterise is
a benefactor of his country, and whose memory ought to be ad-
mired, if it were only for the rare faculty he possessed of collecting
around him, drawing from obscurity, employing, and justly appre-
' dating and rewarding men of genius, such as Brindley, and many
others of similar talent. That Nobleman had encountered immense
risk, with very little and distant prospect of profit or remuneration.
He had made astonishing sacrifices in the pursuit of his object :
there were times when he had left himself without a guinea, such
were his exertions in the prosecution of what turned out of incal-
culable importance and advantage to the interests of the commercial
community. The object of the present Bill was not to pass any
opinion on the merit of the Duke of Bridgewater's vast improve-
ments. The two objects were et once consistent with and wide of
each other. lie would only ask the House to put the projectors of
rail-roads in the same situation with regard to canals, and deal with
them as a former House of Commons had dealt with the Duke of
Bridgewater, in permitting him to compete with high-Toads by
cutting canals. Of course there could be no worse policy (to
take up the subject on those low grounds) than to forget the merits
of a public benefactor.
Mr. HUSKISSON wished to do justice to the Duke of Bridge-
water, who had risked a princely fortune in the pursuit of a great
object. It was because he wished to permit other individuals to
imitate his example that he supported the Bill. He would only
observe, since the decease of that Noblenian, the accommodation for
the commercial interest continued the same, while commerce itself
had increased, and was every day increasing.
After a few observations from General GASCOYNE, the Bill
was read a second time, and referred so • Committee.
IRISH MINING COMPANY.
On motion of Sir R. SHAW, the Irish Mining Companies Bill
was read a second time and committed.
Sir R. SHAW obtained leave to bring in a Bill for the lighting
the suburbs of Dublin with gas.
Mr. J. MACDONALD presented • petition from an individual,
whose name we could not hear, in consequence of the noise occa-
sioned by Slembers leaving the House, against the Liverpool and
Manchester Rail-Road Bill.—Laid on the table.
Sir R. SHAW presented a petition from the Chamber of Com-
merce in the city of Dublin in favour of the same Bill.—Ordered
to be printed.
On the motion of Mr. BROUGHAM, the names of the Hon.
Members who did not attend the late Call of the House were called
over, and the following were ordered to be taken into the custody of
the Sergeant at Arms:—Air. Beaumont, Ale. ('rosby, the Hon.
Mr. Granville, L. Pruby, the Marquis of Tavistock, and Sir H.
Wilson.
Several Honourable Members who had been absent from indis-
position were excused.
COUNTY COURTS BILL.
Lord LOWTHER presented a petition in favour of the County
Courts Bill.
Lord F. OSBORNE presented a similar petition from Gisbo-
rough, in the East Riding of York.
Mr. 110BHOUSE presented petitions from the parishet of St.
George, St. James, St. Anne, St. Margaret, and St. Clement
Danes, against that clause of the County Courts Bill which merges
the present Court of Requests in the County Court ; instead of such
a provision, the petitioners prayed that the jurisdiction of the Court
of Requests should be extended from 40s. to 101.—The several
petitions were ordered to be printed.
IRISH BANKING ACTS.
Sir R. SHAW presented a petition from the Merchants of Dub-

+,

s • THE

PRICES OF FOREIGN
Brazilian Bonds
Ditto Acct. AV
Ditto Scrip 16 pm
Ditto Acct. 164 pin
Ditto Scrip (1825) 4 Pm
Ditto Acct. 44 pm
Buenos Ayres Bonds 92/ /
Ditto Acct. 9e4
Gibilian Bond. 91 904
Colombian Bonds 931
Ditto Bonds (1824) / 2
Ditto Acct. 924 324 2
Danish Bonds 01t
French Bente% 103 f. 40e. 1051.
Exchanife 25f. 10c.
French scrip 16 inn
Greek Bond, 674
Ditto Scrip (1825) 041 4 4 pm


; - -
PR PASS;

lin in favour of an alteratiea is the Irish Banking Acts.—Ordered
to be printed.
EDUC,ITION IN IRELAND.
Mr. CAREW presented a petition from New Ross, in the county
of Wexford praying that some measures may be adopted to pro-
mote FAucation in Ireland.—Ordered to be printed.
ILLEGAL ASSOCIATIONS IN IRELAND.
Mr. CAREW presented • petition from certain Catholics of the
county of Wexford against the Bill to put down the Catholic Asso-
ciation.
Mr. HUTCHINSON presented similar petitions from the towns
of Macroein and Dunmanway.
Sir H. PARNELL presented similar petitions from Portarling.
ton and other parts of the Queen's County.—The petitions were
ordered to be printed.
CLIMBING BOYS.
Mr. WILLIAMS moved that an humble Address be presented
to his Majesty, praying that he would direct a Return to be laid
before the House of the number of Boys bound to Chimney
Sweepers for the last twenty years, distinguishing the Police
Offices at which, pursuant to the 28th George 111., they had been
bound ; the ages of the boys, their names, and the evidence of
their ages ; also the names and residences of their masters. The
Honourable Gentleman declared it to be • s'ain on the humanity
of the country that these unfortunate children should be employed
as they then were, the more particularly, as machinery could be
applied for the same in almost every chimney, and the few that
would not admit the use of machinery could at a trifling expense
be so altered es to ailow it.—Agreed to.
ASSESSED TAXES.
Lord FRANCIS OSBORNE presented petitions from Ely
and Gisbcrough, praying for the repeal of the Assessed Taxes.
Mr. HOBILOUSE presented a aimilar petition front Westmin-
ster. The Hetiourable Gentleman said, that during the five
„years
he had been Member of that House he never heard an expose of a
Chancellor of the Exchequer with so much dissatisfaction u
that for the current year. He trusted something further may be
done, and he was convinced that the feeling which pervaded West-
tninster would spread through the entire country, unless the Chan.
eellor of the Exchequer retraced his steps, and granted additional
relief.—Ordered to lie on the table.
IRISH LINEN LAWS.
Sir HENRY PARNELL gave notice that on Thursday, the
2•ltt of April next, he would move that a Committee of the whole
House take into its consideration the Irish Linen Laws.
CANDLE DUTY.
Lord A. HAMILTON presented a petitior from the Candle-
makers of Olesgow ageisat the dog on candles.—Ordered to be
printed.
LONDON WATER WORKS.
Mr. THOMAS WILSON moved that the petition which he
presented yesterday against the London Water Works Company
be referred to the Standing Orders Commithm.—Ordered.

S I'OCKS YESTERDAY.
Ditto Acct. 09 a 9 pm
Mexican Bonds 8119 911 la
Ditto Acct. 82 / 9 1 1 2 4
Ditto Scrip (1825) 49 1 9 91 9
a m
DittoP Acct. 41 44444H11
9 Pm
Penicillin Bonds 889 • 8i 1
Ditto Acct. 891 89 f_
Portuguese Bond. 90/
Prussian Bonds 101* 9
Ditto Bonds (1822 i 1019
Russianßonds(lo22)9sl 9 9exdis
Ditto Acct. 951 ex div.
Spanish Cons. 241 9
Ditto Acct. 24 I 9
Ditto Cons. (182'3) 191 9
Ditto Acct. 194 I

ZS YESTERDAY.
GAS LIGHT AND CONE COY,
PANICS.

_"-

EATIIE ROYAL, D I WRY- L.INE.
711/ trenlng. THURSDAY. March 3. will tw pellortned
THE MERCHANT OF VENICE.
Sblklak, Mr. Kean; Baseattlo. Mr.% allack ; Portia. MrS.W. West.
After wthch.
THE ,FOILED CHIT D.
Little MEW, Was Clara Fisher; Tag. Mr. Harley.
conelmte with
THE SLEEPING DRAUGHT.

-•- -----
THEATRE ROYAL, COVENT-G.4RDEA:
This Evening, THURSDAY. March 3. will be pethouted
A ROLAND FOR AN OLIVER.
Sly Mark Chase, Mr. Faweett; Alfred Highayer. Mr. Jones; Fixture,
Rayner. Maria Darlington, Miss Feute.
After which.
CHARLES THE SECOND.
Flag Charles, Mt. C. Kemble; Lord Rochester, Mr. Jones; Captain
Copp. Mr. Faweett. Mary Mies M. rce.
To coneiLde with a new Melo-Drania, called
FATHER AND SON;
Or, THE ROCK OF LA CHARRONNIERIL
The Principal Characters by Menem Bennett, Conner, T. P. Cooke.
and Farley; Mesdames Yining, Love, and Davenport.

ADELPHI THEATRE,
STRAND.

This Everting, THURSDAY, March 3. will be presented the Grand
Terrific Spectacle of
VA I.MON DI ;
Or, THE UNHALLOWED SEPULCHRE.
The Principal Characters by Meryl,. Campbell, Po•: er, Lee, Payne,
Villiers. J. Heave, W. Brown, and Elliott; Signor Paulo; Mesdames
Roden, Bryan, Brown, Daly. and Parroek.
After which a new Pastoral Ballet, called
LOVE Ito THE ORCHARD: Or, WHO S !VLF. THE APPLES!
In which the whole Corps de Ballet will appear.
In the course of the Evening, a new Naval Hornpipe. by Master Sum-
meriaad. With a variety of Entertainments.
To conclude with the Farcical Burletta set
FUN AND FRIGHT; Or, HOW ru wttx CONSENT!
Sharpshlns, Mr. Wilkinson.

he
WWI WOO.

1111.,