The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser.
London, England, 1826-04-19 00:00:00

LAW NOTICES.
COVET OP CRANCTRY.

Tllll LIMO COAACIILLOI4 AT Wll/111111 r Tall DAT AT TIM.
Annts. _

Nunn v. Atotter
Exparte Mill. re Parke, bankrupt
petition iser jndernent
Eaparte "frilibl, bankrupt petition
per order
Eap.ate ll.irri•ren, ditto
In re ( peCtlon per
order
In re Baldwin, ditto

Lord Oran,ley v. Oartbwatte
Gortheralte •. Lord Grantlcy, to be
spoke to
/mild Crewe v. Prow l. per or ler
Fdenbtaruorsh •. Oakley, per ut der
aster V. 1114 top of Laudon, cl.ttu
Donn v. Watton, appeal
Coventry a Reader, tour crtasett,
appeal

VICF-CHANCEI.LOWS COVET.
91•0111 Tilt TICS -C , AT WIthTDINITDR, THIS
DAT, AT MAI.V-IPAST 10.
Pleas aod Demnners.
Knlght v. Xntelar, to be spoke to Cartterbaek v. Mord*, ditto
Dryden v. Itubiork.n, rlea Joitoop v. Roy.tcm, Ova
Do.tm.on v. 1%111010"n. ditto I.:Rotund v. Fleetwood, ditto
Grout v. Grunt. demurrer Londualack v. Cloykolk. Did Oval
bi•Orreor v. Eset India Company Ditto v. ditto. tijo Pie"
Ditto v. Part, three pleas Attorney.Ueseral v. Mayor of Bet.
Ditto v. ditto I nick, Ora
Jones v. Pr....ange., ditto Creek v. nucleon, plea
Fairs v. Ayers, demurrer

COURT OP COPUION PL'
VG* •PPOINTUD roa sAv
Ithe:.e+ Common Judo
Aim...worthy. Ileasand
other+
WM' v. Atehe.on
Davis v. Mehl'',

AT TWIRIArg.

Morley ♦. Wyatt
Vot.o.n and others v.
Clark

Palmer •. Lespireve
liranatc.s v. nubby.
Tyler v. Lewis, (lent.

London o,,rninon

Muer v. Smith

Mott r. Raft
Ryan v. Neely
MdvtlN and another v.

wrow, April 20, at 12.

Hinton v. Warren

rtes, appointed fnr To-ms'
London Common Juries
Ward v. IMManure
Itel.,ee v. istimi•un
Lloyd and apother v.
Haynes'
Atrial v. Dawkins
Berry v. Parker
tlVOirlon r. Nom
Morrison and others v.
Thoitpait
lURT Or EXCHIEQUP
THIS DAT. AT TIIX.
Mayor v. Nixon flay v. KW
Wrird v. Revile Medealte v. Medea!"
Reid v. Hebei ti.on Partridge v. Fun kaue
Wollanton v. Marsh tisk v. Luttrell
Codden v. Cbatiatun Prebbie v. Fvnuer

AekroTJ and others ♦.

Green
Baitzzri another r.
Selby sad saalhor v.
Eden
Winicieli V. Nadi

Watoon •. E.rt Belfast
flcale. v. Jacob.
Cracdrill t. Wright.

Callender V. Lawson,

te ~,, • t
Pritchett v. Money-
hoveae. part beard
Ripley v. btuckley

LAW I NTE L LIGENCE.

COURT OF CHANCERY, Tusstuy, Arazi 18.

On his Lordship taking his seat a gentleman addressed him,
stating that he was an attorney of the Court, and bad received an
insult from one of the officers of the Court, and was aim esseider.
ably hurt. lie trusted hie Lordship would Lactase his thus men-
tioning the master.
The Loan CHANCELLOR observed that he acted very properly
in so doing, anti it he would inform him of tie name of the indivi-
dual, he would take care that it should not again occur.
The gentleman stated that he did not wish to name the indivi-
dual, but he thought it right, as an attorney of that Court attending
there in the exercise of his duty, to mention it. '
The Loan CitAxcr.r.Loa said it would not perhaps be im.
proper for him to nay akw words with respect to that Conti. A
complaint had been made that the Court was too small; the fact
Was that it wes larger than the former Court in Westminster Mil,
although it might not be very convenient. The bar appested to be
properly accommodated, but the solicitors had some difficulty to dud
a place wherein to give their attendance. The bar and the solici-
tors must necessarily attend, and tbeir attendance might operate to
the exclusion of another class of his Majesty's subjects. No man
was more satisfied than himself of the value of the publicity of the
proceedings of the Court- it was of the utmost importance; but
there was no class of his Majesty's subjects none entitled than an-
other. It had been supposed that he had made some order for the
exclusion of certain persons. There was not the least truth in it ; he
had wade no order, either one way or the other. lie wished to
state that whatever might be the consequence of what he did or
said, or however his actions might be represea'cd, his determination
was, that all have a right to attend, and he would not make an order
for any class except for the banisters and solicitors. After some
observations with respect to the gallery which. as we understood
his Lordship, is to be altered, his Lordship said he had thought it
proper to say thus much, not wishing to be misrepresented.

WELLESLEY V. THE DUKE OF lEAUFORT.
The Loup Out:scar-Loa said, that haring the papers In this
ease now before him, he would state what presented Its If to him as
necesmry at the present stage of the muse to be done ; or rather he
would intimate, for the consideration of counsel, whether or not
Mr. Wellesley would not think it proper to make some further affi-
davits. His Lordship then alluded to the question as to the right
of the Court to interfere in such a case, and said it was a painful
dory, and that siVer'y Judge should exercise It with the greaten care,
anxiety, and caution. Respect for the feelings of a father. and the
duty of the children to their father, should be consulted and upheld.
He had hall occasion to interfere in a case, which it was not neces-
sary to name, where the father was training up his children in the
prindples of atheism ; in that case he had declared his judgment ;n
tenths* to the counsel, that they might see the grounds upon which
Isia decision rested In the prasent case there were a number of cir-
cumstances which had not been answered, and many that had. Mr.
Wellesley had sworn that hr hail been obliged to barn and lock up
s number of tract, from his children, which tended to instil into
their minds principles of sectarianikni. Another fact was, that when
Mrs. W. separated herself from her husband, it was distinctly un-
derstood that the children should be brought up under the directions
of their father; but in giving his judgment, it did not follow if the
children were taken from their father's care, that they must of ne-
comity be under the care of any of the persons whose names had
come before hint ; hut it had been distinctly sworn by the ladies
named in the cause, that the children went regularly to church
every Sunday. His Lordship then took a review oldie transaction
with a lady whom he would not name, at Naples, Paris, and other
places, and suggested that the lady might have made an affidavit
in reply to some of the facts. In conclusion, his Lordship oh.
served, that probably Mr W. might think proper to make some
further affidavits; and he also thought that .11r. Pitman might be
ab!e. by an additional affidavit in explanation of some points that
must have come under his observation, placed as he was with re-
gard to the children, very much to enlist hint in determining which
of the pullet had sworn truly or otherwise.
Mr. HAAT assured his Lordship that Mr. Welledey was quite
ready to make any farther vifidavito his Lordship might think
proper, and had only retrained from making more on account of
the number of affidavits that would have poured in from the other
side.

hlr. tIoaNE stated that the lady his Lordship had alluded to
had been always ready to file such an affidavit a would have re.
moved the loed of calumny that bad been heaped upon her, al.
though she certainly would not den' the connexion.
It was eventually understood that .Me. Wellesley and Mr.: it.
man should make some further affidavits in reply to the second
series of affidavits of Dr. Ilulkeley sod Mr. O'Meara, If they
thought proper.