The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser.
London, England, 1826-06-10 00:00:00

1111FORII TN! LOAD CI

Emden v. Coventry, per order
Martinny v. Cooper, appeal
ChatterN v. Young, appeal
Same v. Chatteris, ditto
Colegrave v. Manby, ditto

• ••........••••••• ••••......• - , -- - -- -
•1/0/111 TITS TICI•C•AWCILLOR. TRIO •AY, AT NAILT•PAIPT TM,.
Remaining Motions.
Exparte Hodgkis,bank. De Tastett v. Chapman
rapt petition Thomas v. Syne
Sweet v. Howe Ivey v. Stead
Holland v. Marsh Same v. same
Barney Y. Luckett, Hargreaves Y. Routers
pauper Tanner Y. leery
Ills Honour the Vice-Chancellor will hear abort causes on Tuesday, the
13th Inst. to be put at the bead of the paper.

Lewis V. Lewis, at de-

fendant's retittelt
Chalk v. SrnOh, pet.
Harding v. Todd
Russell v. Anstwlck

[ROLLS COURT.—Tuts PAT. AT Nino.
Cannes, Farther Directions, and Petitions by Consent.
Win T. Vernon, far. Burrell v. Smith, cause Garbutt v. Tippintt,pet.
ther directions Vaughan v. Weevil, Bronneker v. Hague,
Whitaker v. Coiling. further directions ditto
wood, petition Brandon v. Brandon, Exparte Gooch, ditto
Reddish v. t4tevenz, do. petition Fitzgerald v. Field. do.
Pettingall v. Clover,do. Agar v. George, ditto Webb e. Kelly, cause
Bland v. Lamb, ditto Heather v. None. ditto Eaton v. Smith, ditto
Thellussonv.Woodford Bradshaw v. Bradshaw, He•lop v. Cornpton,do.
ditto ditto Expert/ Adeane, pet.
Lefroy v. Lefroy, ditto Exparte Plercy, ditto
Adams v. Limbrey, do. In re Hickey's estates,
Iloldich v. Samwell, ' ditto
ditto Hales v. Smith, ditto
In re Hunt, petition Moir v. kindle, ditto
In re Howorths, ditto Cann v. Cann, ditto
Thompsoay.Sbeppard, Honing v. Chare, do.
ditto Parker v. Harrold, do.

Browning V. E npbazn,

ditto
Winckworth v. Green-
well, ditto
Herbert v. Laecn, fur-
ther directions
Morley v. Rantsbotham
petition
Smith v. Davies, cause

AKCIIES CM:BT.—Tam DAY, we Tay.
Fourth and last Sethkm In Trinity Term, 1526.—Before Sir John Nichol.

COURT OF EXCHEQUER.
Grubb v. Grubb, demurrer I Nainby V. JJlland4, demurrer
Trinity Term end, Wednesday, June 14.

APPOINTED SITTINGS.
COURT OF RINI:3'g RINCU.
Middlesex—Monday, June 12 ; Thur,.dav, June IR, until the 24th t Spe-
cial Junin, Tnesday, June 20, till the 24th, In order of entry, beginning
with the remanent causes. London—Tuesday, June 13. No causes will
be tried in London on Friday, June 16; Adjournment tray. Monday,
June 26 , Special Juries, Monday, July 3, till the 7th, in order of entry,
beginning with the remanent CRUM'S.
COVRT or COMMON PLIIAII.RITTINOg
Middlesex, Thursday. June 15 ;-London, Friday, June 16. Middlesex
Sittings, Saturday, Ju.m 17 and following days. To sit at ten.

LAW INTELLIGENCE.

COURT OF CHANCERY, FRIDAY, Juxic 9.

WELLESLEY L. THE DUKE or BEAUFORT.
Mr. HART told his Lordship that lie had obtained an additional
affidavit on the part of his client, and which he was now prepared
to hand up for the perusal of his Lordship.
Mr. 'fnEsLovr, asked whether it would not be proper, before
Mr. dart should be allowed to say anything as to the contents of
that affidavit, that his (Mr. Treslove's) client should be permitted
to obtain a copy of it ?
Mr. HART—WeII, I have no objection to let you see mine ;
there it is for you.
FE-PARTE ORIMSTEAD —IN RE HOWARD AND OHMS.
The LORD CHANCELLOR went through a further portion of
the evidence in this case, and said he would continue to do so on
each leisure day until he had gone through the whole, and he
would then give final judgment, which he hoped he should be able
to do on Tuesday next.