The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser.
London, England, 1819-07-03 00:00:00

•
ta"
•.•
from Moils of the Admiralty he rectiree-iiith
the other Princes.] •
Lord Lowcuiat:resitiniol. lie said, lie 'Mired
the mot. would be withdrawn, hut of the Rill
should he brought in, he would offer other obser-
vations in a future i.tiege of it.
Alderman %Vona said, tier islet of a lottery was
not entertained by his Rapti Ilighnes4„ but was
soggested to hint by other persons—trier.. tome
occurred in the body of the llouse.l—
Weems,' Wool swirl he w ttt anxious to save the
tow., of the !low-, and the hest way of or.,vroting
the loss of time weir not to interrupt lion—he Was
runt to be totenupieil—never would lie he prevented
in that Hume by any intrrrioption from pgforining
leis duty as the Representative of the pi-4.We,—.
Hear, heir.)—Hr repeated, that the subject was'
pressed upon his (Loyal Ilh_theiess by Inco friends,
and if the metre was arraii4eil, persons Ito were
its the habit of getting rid of such iliffietilti,—(4
laugh)---would immediately mratige the viyinent
of the 11111•Bery. He woUlsi, m delei.roce to the feel-
ing of the Hiestae, withdraw the motion.
Lord CASTLItttIIACII Slid, he we. glall to hear
the rieelArtstion a the worthy Alderman, for it re.-
cue 4 hi. K Highoei.s not of this m
stter.

Mr. GIIKIIVELL .aill, Shut in what fell from hint
lie certainly norawt un perimml therrlTeet.

PENRTN ELECTION.
Mr. C. 114kVEV pre-enter! a Petition from Mr.
H. Swami, privily; for the interference •r the I luu.e.
Mr. Swann was returned fur Penryst. and hos elec-
tion was sulerequently declared void by a Commit-
tee of the and the AttnntryGrteral was
ordered to prosecute him fo► twittery at the A•siz•a
of Cornwall. Mr. Serjeatit Dell wa. counsel for
Mr. Swann du►iog the urogres+ of the Committee.
and Was ectinaiteterl with all the circumstances of
Isis arse, but hr was now retained by the Attorney.
General to midget the 'wool:titian against Mr.
Swains. Au applicatiotrar 111 made to the Solicitor.
General to release Mr. Dell from the engagement
of the Attorney-General, but he did not think
Itim,elf authorised to do so without the directions
of the House.

The SOLICITORZWIRRAL slid, the proceed.
ing was not nisprecedestril—it even occurred
at the last pro.ecution roe Priori. There Mr.
Serjemut Bell was counsel oh the Committee fur
the Member, and afterwards conducted the prose-
cution for the Crown. .1111 the prevent ease he hod
only to observe. that Mr. Bell was retained by the•
Attorney-General—that he sabsequeatly attended
cutioultations oa the subject of the prosecation.—
Ile conld leave no personal wish to act with harsh.
seal towards the Petitioner; he would be noxious
to receive owl to observe the directions or the
House. • _

Mr. %V. %VYNN said, lie saw no relief dist could
be given to the Petitioner. The House ordes'ed the
Attorney-General to institute anti to conduct the
pro,ectition.and they left the inciter in his btu&

The Petition wag rejected.
Mr. F. DouGLAI raid, he wished to know from
the Hen. Gentleman opposite whether any step,
had been taken by his Majesty's Govern:twit to
prevent the recurrence or the sanguinary and out-
rageous proceedings that took place its the case of
Lord Selkirk and the North I%'est C !tasty ?
Mr. GOULBURN Mild, that every means lent been
taken, that pawn were uow b.:fore the Privy Council
waiting their decision.
Mr. BemmEre wiahetl to know if any steps had
been taken respecting the murder of Major Semple ?
Mr. GouLcuaN said. that in this case lie had
seen a repast of a trial. but had uui yet received
au official report.