The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser.
London, England, 1825-11-10 00:00:00

PATENT STEAM CARRIAGE COMPANY.

A meeting of the Shareholders In this Company was held yester-
day at the London Tavern.
Mr. BELcnEn (one of the Trustees) was called to the Chair.
The CHAIRMAN then slate!, that the present meeting hod been
convened in consequence of a requisition signed by thirty or forty
proprietors. Upon the result of that meeting would depeqd either
the carrying on, or total abolition of the Company. Decor! the re-
ceipt of the requisition, the trustees had communicated with the
patentees of the carriage, to ascertain what length of time must
elapse previous to their being called on to witness a trial of it ; the
answer was, that a month would complete the object. With this
request they agreed, but when that period had expired, nothing was
heard as to an exhibition, or any communication whatsoever as to
the capabilities of the undertaking. The gentlemen then present
would have an opportunity of hearing Mr. Plasket's (the patentee)
explanation and reason for not having effected what he had led the
shareholders to exret. There had been of the first instalment,
25,000/. received, 5.0001. of which, agreeable to the wording of the
prospectus, had been advanced to the patentee to enable him to
carry the plan into execution, and the remaining 20,000/. were in
the hands of the Bankers, which sum, should the Meeting deter-
mine upon abandoning the Company, would be repaid in the pro-
portion of 24 per share to the holders.
It was then moved, and F econed , that Mr. Plasket be requested to
give an explanation.
Mr. PLARRET acknowledged having received the 5,0001. but
from that he had not derived the least benefit, inasmuch as the
whole sum was paid to those who were interested, or rather those
who had to manufacture the awriage. Those geutlemen, from the
novelty of the plan of generating the steam, lied found it requisite
to make many more experiments than had been originally antici-
pated, and to that circumstance the delay was owing ; but at every
interview with the parties, they had fully sutured lti.n of their al-
most daily expectation of effecting their object. Major al`Cuidie,
the projector, was then present, and would he hoped, inform the
proprietors of his opinion. Fearing lest there might be a want of
knowledge upon the subject, he had applied to an intimate friend.
1 who has watched the progress of the carriage, its furniture, &c. and
he had then his report, Which he would read. He was • large
shareholder himself, and had never sold a single share—such was
the high opinion lie held of the plan. His opinion,' were founded
upon those whose judgment was far superior to his own, and who
say that the object can, and will, be effected. The advantages de.
arable to himself were perspective, anti depended solely upon the
completion of the plan. At present lie was a considerable sum out
of pocket.
The cause of delay was stated to be occasioned by waiting for
pipes from Birmingham.
Major APConotE said he had received 2,000/. from Mr. Plasket
for four-fifths of the patent. Ile had paid 1,000/. for a carriage,
and the other 1,0001. he kept as a remuneration to himself. He
had applied to Mr. Middleton for a carriage, which he had fur.
nished, and a very good one it was; but it was necessary to have
another, which he expected in a very short time. lie was a holder
of 400 shares, many of which he had purchased at a premium of 2{
per share.
Mr. STEPURNA, a shareholder, hoped the 5,000/. had not been
paid without • security for effecting the object.
The CHAIRMAN said they had received an undertaking (which
was read) from Mr. Placket.
It was also stated that the carriage and other apparatus would
belong to the Company.
Mr. Joint bTEPIIEWI then moved that the Company be abo-
lished, and that the instalment of 21. per share be returned.
This was carried unanimously, and a Committee of live gentle-
men elected to investigate the expenditure of the 6,000/.

Alter thanks had been voted to the CluireaantZitifruatces, the
Meeting broke up.

In consequence of the late transactions at Whitebaven
the master shipwrights of that port, and Of Harrington,
IVorirington, and Maryport, held a meeting at the Black
Lion Inn, Oct. '27, Thomas Hartley, Erq. in the chair,
when they unanimously agreed not to employ any men sit
all connected with the Unions ; but to induce those men to
release themselves from the trammels of such pernicious
societies, that they at the same time agreed " to raise the
general rate of shiptirights' wages in Cumber!and from
'lns. to `its. a week."

L Ili IN.TELLIGEN(4::

COURT Or CHANCERY, IVZONESDAT, No!. 9.

FITZGIBBON, C. MOORE.
rpou the sitting of the Court this day.theSoLICITOR-GENERAL
was heard in reply. Ile could not allow the use to conclude with-
out saying something in answer to the observations of Commiel at
the other side. The application was stated to be novel—it was by
n 3 means so. The authotity of the Court in such melt was delihe.
rately asserted on various occasions. Lord Tharlow had said that
the power of witiulrawing a child from his parent was not to be
wantonly exercised ; and he said.in another place, that the power of
a parent was not to be unnecessarily disposed of. The case was
not that which was stated by Counsel at the other side., In this
case the parent was not willing properly io perform his duties.
ThCLORD CHANCELLOR—It p a great absurdity for the .infsnut
to state themselves to be illegitimate. If Mr. Moore die not with-
draw himself from his wife's bed when the other gentleman got
into it, it is very hard indeed for the infants to state what they have
done. .

The SoLtcrron-GrxEnAt cont.i'tlered the objection to the pe-
tition rather flatter of form than of fact. The children Mated In
the petition what their next friend (void e stated, and he un.
derttootl it was common to present such petitions tither in the
name of a child or his next friend.

! The Lour Convci:t.ion--1t has never been common to pre-
tent a petition from n child, containing such aliegattont,
Mr. SOLICITOR-GENERAL continued. His Learned Friends
had put a case of hypothetical absurdity. in which, after an adul-
terous intercourse, a man, or five men, Irishmen they said, may
come to the legal father of a family and say this child of yours, or
these children, were procreated by me, or by us, in adultery, and
we must have our child or children. This was the cane charged
upon Mr. Fitz ibbon. but what was the real case ? Mr. Moore
supplied an illustration of hit Counsel's argument, which was an
absurdity in this case• lie chose one child, which he asserted was
his, but he disclaimed and repudiated another child, which the
law gave him. This was a daring violation of law amd-ehris-
tianity. It trip conduct which could not be sanctioned by
any Court. Mr. Fitzgibbon, it was true, was not allowed to
come into a Court and demand one of Mr. Moore's children, but
when Mr. Moore repudiated his own child, had he a right tot"-
pose another person who was willing to perform those parental
duties which iws not willing to perform ? The parent was not
willing to educate his children according to the rank which they
were entitled to fill. Ile talked of bseeding up his daughter, who
was nearly connected with noble roma", in a cabin. The daugh-
ter was to be bred up in powerty .wiee, from which her natural/
parents were anxious to preserve her. The Solicitor-General here
alluded to the contradictory atdavits of Ld. Brandon and Mr. Moore.
The LORD Ctsawcwxxon said, he could well belieee that a
man in the agonized state of feeling in which Mr. Moore was,
would make many allegations which he would not repeat lu calmer
moments.

The SO T. Teri OR MENER AL resumed. Lord Brandon's Bifida-
' sit wait declared to be untrue. Why should not the affidavit of
Lord Brandon be as deserving of credit as that of his nephew, Mr.
Moore? Mr. Moore, in one part of his affidavit, denied the state-
ment of Lord Brandon, whilst, in the conchtsion, he swore that he
knew not what he had said. Notwithstanding thin admission of
Mr. Moore, Lord Brandon's veracity was impeached. although he
was corroborated by the affidavit of Mr. Low, which was not
replied to, and also in many points by the affidavit of Mr. Moore.
A more unmerited attack he had never heard than that made upon
the veracity of Lord Brandon. It was no case for the dirt and ashes
which had been so copiously thrown on it at the other side. If it
were the law of the House of Lords not to bastardise* child, that
the parent may repudiate the child, and that a Court of Equity
could not interfere to bestow the custody of the child upon others,
the child is left in a state n which no child ought to be left in
Great Britain. If such was the law it was neither religious nor
politic. The Solichor-Orneral here alluded to the case of the un.
fortunate poet Savage, whose history was the best of the great
Dr. Johnson's works. That great genius was bred to the awl—
educated in a cobbler's shop. His natural mother was the Countess
of Macclesfield, his Molter was an Earl. The Countess of Mac-
clesfield cruelly abautioned this child ; she said she would breed
him up in ignorance and obscurity—in a cobbler's shop ; but if any
of his relations had conic forward, saying they would bring op and
educate this young man as a gentleman, aed.as theson of the Earl
of Rivers and the Countess of Macclesfield, would the Lord Chan.
cellar of that hay decide, that as the Countess of 11Iacelewlield was
the parent she nifty abuse her relationship, and bring up her child
in poverty and obscurity, although others were willing to provide
for the child in a manner more suitable to his birth ? The present
case was no: so strong, but the leading features were similar to that
he had stated. It was said Mr.Fitzgibbon had not made an inde-
feisitile and irrevocable provision for the child, and therefore that
he should not he allowed to supersede the legal parent. Now what
kind of a provision was made by Mr. Moore, the legal parent, for
the son ?—something ernitadned in the codicil to a will ; and lie
would ask his Learned Friends was the codicil to a will indcfel-
sible and irrevocable in Ireland, anti could it not be annihilated ?
Thus, although the petition was rimmed because Mr. Fitzgibbon
had not made an irrevocable settlement, it appeared that Mr.
Moore hail himself made nothing like an irrevocable provision.
Considering all the circumstances of the case he humbly submitted,
thnt feeling and fact, as well as precedent, were in his favour,' and
that should grant the prayer of the petition.
The Loan CHANCELLOR said, if was his custom before he
gave judgment on questions before him, to determine upon his
reasons, and to demil those reasons pretty largely when lie came to
give judgment. He was led to this practice, by his observations
when at the bar, and stibarmient experience induced him to believe
that It was both useful and satisfactory. ft may be that this prac-
tice sometimes caused delays in giving judgment, but if those de-
lays prevented unnecessary appeals, founded in ignorance as to the
reasons for the decision of the Court, and prevented other suits
tram coming into Court, the practice had been productive of pub-
lic benefit. There was no question in which the public was more
deeply concerned, than when the jurisdiction of the Court was ex-
ercised in opposition to what he called the acknowledged rights of
Parents. It was not necessary to assign the ground on which that
jurisdiction of the Con* stood. In the case of Mandeville is Man-
deville, he had stated his reasons at large as the ruse proceeded,
and stated in his judgment the grounds on which that juriatliction
could be properly exercised by the Court. He would abide by the
doctrines lie laid clown in that case, and he had not come to those
corcluaions entirely by the unassisted efforts of his own mind.
When Lord Thurlow was living, he enjoyed n close intimacy
with that great man, who. when he applied his mind to
any of the pest doctrines of law and equity, could master
them with an energy whirls perhaps no other man could.
He had also the honour of knowing Lord Kenyon, whose judgment
on all questions of law justly stood very high. He had frequently
enjoyed conversations and took a part in discussions with those
great men, from which, he might be allowed to say, he derived
much illumination of mind on those points which exercised his
judgment since he presided in that Court. He had no doubt that
the doctrines he bad laid down, in the cases alluded to, were such
that, if the illustrious persons he named could be called back, they
would concur in them, and perhaps recognise them as their own.
He designed not to deal out censures on any persons, but he was
bound to consider the circumstances under which this case came
before him, and had no hesitation in saying that, where a person
guilty of adultery with the female parent, and a female parent
guilty of adultery during the continuance of the sacred bonds of
marriage, come to demand the possession of children, their hav-
ing made a pecuniary provision for the purpose of taking the chil-
dren from their legal parent, should rot induce hint to interfere.
Nothing would go further to overturn all moral duties than the in.
' terpasition of the Court in such a ease, unless it appeared clearly
that the children would be in a more miserable condition when in
the custody of their parent, than in the unfortunate case of their
being placed under the care of time who had violated their fa-
mily duties. For tile benefit of the children, the Court may
be justified in choosing the least of two great evils. But, in
such a case, it was imperiously required that the interest
of the children should not be compromised. The House of ,
Lords, in his opinion, most properly had refused, in cases of di- 1
vorce, to hear any evidence of legitimacy, upon the ground that 1
the children had rights, which they were not present to defend.
Upon the question of accent, a child must be heard as well as its
parents. Such was the principle acted upon by the House of Lords,
and yet he was called upon, sitting where he did, upon the allege.
don of a child only two years and a half old, to declare that child
illegitimate, although he was compelled by the Act of Parliament
to believe him legitimate. Indeed, under that Act, the House of
Lords, had they entertained such a question, could not have deter-
mined upon the illegitimacy of the children, as it was stated that
the adulterous intercourse began subsequent to the birth of those
children. Should he ever again sit in the House of Lords, either
on the Woolsack or as a Member, this case suggested to him the
necessity. for a series of questions, as to the reality of damages said
to be obtained. He did not mean to throw out any censure on those
concerned in the ease before the House of Lords ; he simply meant
to state the course it suggested to him. There could be nn doubt
that theldeed of settlement executed by Mr. Fitzgibbon was exe-
cuted far the purpose of raising the question in Court. That deed
may be revoked at a future period by consent of the parties, and
with its prnvlsoes it was worth nothing as to its intended use. Be-
fore he decided upon such a settlement in any case, he should insist
upon its being complete. The sum total of the case was, that he
could not interfere upon the instance of persons who hail dissolved
such 3 connexion as had existed between Mr. and Mra. Moore. anti
farmed such a connexion as they hail subsequently done. to declare
children illegitimate whom he was bound to consider legitimate.
Under other circumstance., the interests of the children may have
induced him to Interfere, but for the interest of any child he could
not, by his interference, destroy the great obligations upon which
all family happiness depended, and lay down doctrines upon which,
by application, the happines of all the children in England de-
pended. There was not the slightest pretence for such an applica-
tion on the part of the boy henry Moore. He was bound, there-
fore. to dismiss the petition ; he could not allow the children to re-
cord their own illegitimacy. As to the female child, if a proper pe-
tition watt trained, in the name of the proper parties, he did not
object to hearing it argued. Ile could not make the children pay
'the costs in this case, and there was no one else whom he could pro-
perly oblige to pay them. He woald therefore content himself with
simply dismissing the petition.

. .
IX THE MATTEL OP NrELLERLET W. THE 131.:KE nF
arar TORT.
Mr. HART 114,1. he held a petitiat from Mr. iVelelticr, stating.
that as he did not reside in lingland. he was not competent satisfac-
torily to attest♦ 10 the edumnon of his clllldrcn. He therelne
prayed the Cottrt to refer the petition to die Mssicr, io order that a
pjan may be laid down fin the education cf his three childr,:n, acd
a suitable establishment provided fie their suppait and
tenants..

ltlr. TRESLOVE more:; tkat the pet:thm of the Ihthc of Beat•

fort should be referred at the same time, In order that the Aluste
might hare the whole case before bim. •
Mr. 11A irr would not consent that the other petition should sc.
cotnpiny Alr. Wellesley'a. It contained charm which were super.
&mut and scandalous, and there was no reason why it should be
referred to,the Alaater.

•
Takiii.ove. thought that if both petitions sacre not referred,
the Master could not be acquainted with what had passed in Court,
and would decide altoge.her upon the statement of the father. •
The SOLICITOR-GENERAL-31y Lord, we wish to know what
the petition is, that we may grapple with it. It does not seem to
point out who is to be tutor to the children, nor who is to have die
appointment of tutor. -

31r. Ilmur-111r. Wellesley states his inclination to conform in
every way to whatever the Court thinks proper to order.
The Sor.rc t•ron-GENottot --Is Mr. Wellesley willing that the
Court should appoint.a guardian for the children ?
The Loon CHANCELLOR-1 take it, from his petition, tlfat
Mr. Wellesley is willing to allow the Court, during his residence
abroad, to appoint a person in the nature of a guardian. If he is
alas willing that the children should remain, is the custody of the
Court, 'and should not be removed from that.custodv, 1 see no ob-
jection to granting the prayer of the petition. No interference,
however, must take place in the present situation of the children,
until it be clearly referred to the discretion and judgment of the
Court.

• •
Mr. HART—My Lord, Iconceive ;those conditions are corm..
quential upon the order the Court is called on to make.
The LOAD Cissect:Lxou—Mr. Wellesley is now out of the
kingdom, and by his absence precluded from exercising his parental
authority. I cannot make any order, however, to prevent him from
applying that he may resume his authority ; but I shall have :c
inserted in the order that his mere return doss not give him the
right to resume his authority and destroy this arrangement, without
any application being made to the Court.
Hi:acts—Thought the two petitions were different: one
(that of Mr. Wellesley) was complete—the other was intompletu
because it was not defended, and if it was sent to the Master he
would give it equal weight with that which WI% complete.
The Lono CHANCELLOR—If that petition stands over, the
other must. I can't send aerie to be considered on one side by the
Master.

. 111 r. lIVAi 13.—1 r. this ♦iew of the case, my Lord, we withdraw
our opposition.
The two petitions were then ordered to be referred to the )(aster•

.VICE-CIIANCELLOR'S COURT, WEDNESDAY, Nov. V.

•
His HONOUR WU thin dey occupied with hearing arguments on
pless.anel tleaturrers, of no general interest.

COURT OF KING'S BENCH, WznszsziAT, Nov. 9.

This being Lord Mayor's-day, the Judges of this Court ante
their scarlet robes, in compliment to the new Lord Mayor. The
Lord Chief Justice wore Oa gold chain, it Chief Justice of all Eng-
land, " cupyolis justiciaries loans Anglia."
In the comet of the morning, Alderntan Venable', the new Lord
Mayor, after having been. sworn in at the Court of Exchequet,
came into this Court with the other officers of the Corporation, the
Recorder having moved, that Mr. be Blanc be appointed Attorney
of this Court, to defend WI the right,' anti privileges of the City
He invited the Judges in the name of the Lord Mayor to dine
with his Lordship, at Guildhall, this day, at tive o'clock, whicla
invitation was very graciously aclarpted.
oar.rowny D. Netts AXIS honinsox.
This was an action on a contract by the plaintiff, who is the
eminent engineer, to build a meant engine for the defendants, who
reside in Hunhill-row, and carry on an extensive buaineas there, as
the manufacturers of certain fani7 Mildew of dress. It was tried
before the Lord Chief justice, at tire London Sittings after last
term. There was a verdict for the plaintiff.
The ATTORXXY-GENEnAr. now moved for a new trial. Ile
said that the plaintiff; had originally contracted to build this engine
foe 3201. and to have It set up anti ready for work by the tub April,
1824. It was Very material for the defendants to have it early !It
the season, as that was the period of the year when the articles of
their manufbeture came mom into demand. It was therefore im-
portant to them that this engine should be ready for use at the tithe
agreed on, anti any delay subsequent to this could not but be in-
jurious to them. The engine, however, eras nor ready till the 15th
of May. Messrs. Robinson and alins were willing to give eve,'
accommodation, and they overlooked tuis delay. When the en-
gine was set up, it would not work for more than fifteen or twenty
minutes at • time. Attempts were made to remedy the defect, but
without success; still it would not work. At last, wearied out by
there ratio rex, the defendants in this action sent for Ahem. Donkin
and Lloyd, also very eminent engineers, to examine this engine. No-
tice was sent to 3(r. Galloway to attend. He did not attend, hole-
ever. Ihnikin and Lloyd made their report, which pointed out the
defects of the engine. fir. Galloway Seauterced in emir repent,
and promised to remove the defects which they assigr&l by a cer-
tain day. This day came, and 5101 the engine would nut work.
Mills and Robinson. upon this, wrote to Mr. Galloway to take
away his engine. He did not do this, sad they themselves took it
down, with notice to him to take away its materials. Put to great
expense and inconvenience by the delay to which they had been
put by this mismanagement on the part of Mr. Galloway, they
brought an action against him to recover damages for the lost
they had sustained. Mr. Galloway brought a crotr.action on the
contract, and had the good fortune to get his case first on the
paper and obtained a verdict. In this action, the Attor-
ney-General contended, that the verdict was against evidence. He
had called as witnesses several eminent engineers, who had given
testimony as to the defects of the engine, and on the other side lc
was not attempted to deny them : it was only attempted to be
proved for the defence, that they were trivial detects; but, how-
ever trivial they might be, several months had passed away in
attempts to remove them, all of which had failed. He submitted
under these circumstances, that the case ought to go to emothe.
Jury, and hoped that their Lordships would no: Tease his
motion.

The Court granted a rule Niri. • . •
CRIMINAL INFORDIATiON.

THE BOROUGIL OF RYE.
111 r. Soaotr:TT moved for &criminal information against several
inhabitants eithe borough-of Rye. Toe Corporation of this borouglt
consisted of a mayor, juries, and freemen. This Corporation.
whether regarded as an individual corporation, if he might use
such an expression. or, as one of the corporations of the Cinque
Ports, was one of the most ancient in the kingdom. By the
original charter the officers of this Corporation were annually-
elected on the Sunday next after the feast of Saint Barth°.
locum. which would be about the latter end of August In the
year 1631 the day of election was changed to the Monday follow-
ng, and so had continued ever since. It was the custom for the
Mayor, jurats, and freemen, to assemble in the Town-hall, and
elect a new Mayor; the new 3layor then took the chair, and chose
from the freemen the jurats, of whom there could not be more
than twelle in number. The Mayor is by viettse of his office a
Jostice of Peace. In the course of the past summer about GO or
70 persons, on one occasion, presented themselves at the Court to
have the oaths of allegiance and supremacy administered ; for this
request they would assign no reason whatever; the oath was never-
theless administered. On the 20th of hut August being the
Sunday preceding the day of election of the Mayor, ht.
which would be the day of election according to the original
charter, a number of persons assembled, mid went through a
mock ceremony of electing a Mayor, Jurats, &c. On the follow-
ing day, when the Mayor, Jurats, he. had assembled to elect nex
Officers, according to custom. Mr. Richard %%Ilium], who had bar
appointed Town Clerk by the mock assembly, attended in the
Town.liall, and protesters against the proceedings of the day. Ile
and his compeers were ordered to withdraw, when they retired in a
body to the extremity of the hall. On the next Court day this
party again made their appearance, made speeches, &h. and at
length the Mayor was compelled to make some of them find Dail_
They then went to the end of the hell and made a kind of adjourn..
nient. On the llith October a number of them, among whom
were Mr. 31ills, Alr. Bloxall, Mr. Stocks, &c. contrived to gee
possession of the Town.hall, by breaking the locks. This wan the
day on which the Quarter Session, were held, anti when the Mayor
andithe officers of the Corporation went to open the Court, they
found it already occitiped, Mr. Merriam bring seated as Mayor, 11/
his robes, and Mr. 11-hitton as Town Clerk, and all the other
offices filled by persons in the appropriate costume. Mr. Thomp-
son, the real Mayor, was obliged to adjourn the Sessions to his
own house, the fictitious Mayor and his associates, hating seized
the offices and the place, determined to keep possession ; they ac-
cordingly occupied the Town-hall all night, had since continued t.,
act in a corporative capacity, had carried oaf the Records of the
Corporation, which have never yet been restored, and hartconl.
mated various other outrages. The Learned Counsel, under there
circumstances, moved their Lordships to grant a criminal informa-
tion; a quo :ow winto, he said, would be too slow, a remedy to meet
a case in which all the business of the Corporation, and all the
functions of public justice were arrested.
Dlr. Justice BAYLET—I suppose the real fact is, t bat the rig' t
of election her in the inhabitants.

Mr. SCARLETT—Tbet;;be so, but this is not the proper
mode to try it.

The LORD CHIEF JUSTICE—Most certainly not. Take y,:t:,7
rule to show cause.

Rule granted against all the parties named in the affidavits.
RYDER V. LORD CHARLES TOWNSEND.
This was a case tried before the Lord Chief Justice at the last
Assizes, and a verdict brunt' for the plaintiff.
Mr. STORIES now moved to have this verdict se aside anti a
nonsuit entered ; the only question was, whether a sufficient tender
hail been made. One of the witnesses deposed that he went to pay
the money t that he hod pact of the money its his hand, part in lisi
pocket-bMik, hich the plaintiff could norssec, and that he askc.i
plaintiff if he had got a receipt stamp. The plaintiff said he had
not then • receipt stump, but he would go and get one; that hethn
witness went again once or twice after, and the plaintiff was not
come back, though he had had sufficient time. as the distance rm..
not far to where he mold get a r,xei pt ramp. Wu this a sulicies.t
tender? The Learned Counsel contended that it was, and and,
onElr not the pry to give! receipt ?

The Loan' ''Jus'etcs-L-The prrty paviow Puma right t 4
a receipt, but then he ought to take a reeeipt stamp with him.
Mr. `routes admitted that ha Was rather taken by surprise, I%r
he did not think that it wan needier, to takes receipt stamp. lie
submitted, however, upon the wit" that there was a dullick
tender.

The Bonn CHIEF. Jurricx—floor do you maim that ow
There was no offer of the money.
•
Rule reamed.
'MEGAN V. EOM.
This was an action of assuinpait tried ►cafe the Lord Chief
dce at the Middlesex Sittings *At last. Term, to mover 4A.

•

.`