The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser.
London, England, 1810-08-29 00:00:00

ItTOSIL

Knows the Defenilant—iN on relation to him,
h.at a roticetion marriage—lived in Cork rt
Am • of the trainiction—knew of the family
of the Sargent', by reputation and character.—
Plaintiff mime to Witness's haulm in Cork. in May
twelvensunth--she had no child with her—Plaintiff
informed willows of her bituniio6--rhe appeared dis-
trained and distracted, and almost out other mind—
Defendant and hiniervant came the day rullinsitie—
minimal asked Defendant if he intended to ()chase
lummitable—he said to be sere he would—when
Defendant cause intro the room, otie*chrinioni• and
be embraced and kissed her—l). fi orissit
Plaintiff had patience for a few days. ferny thing
would be watled--wittiest shed Defendant in the
weaning. did he mean to marry Plaint ill.?-1.)efentl-
twit Pohl lie 'null—Writ morning e!sey 'rut bosh
ott—..witnew a btnwil her to iv with him, in copse.
quence of bi. proinue.--Lhfrudaut Ile. Ewen tear.
fled Pine that ttanwiction.
liege the lbaintitra ca-e closed—nod Mr.!.,.
M.M aif in stated the Deft-Wear case, dud
relied his triti.eowni.

Mr. l'atritk Cullen examined by Mr. U. D.

(;aAPI.

Condurted business a. a distiller fur Mr, White
for route tunr--Initarit wit,' Mr.. Hunt in ttni7—
knew the I)efonilenit at that tune.—.l3efrinlaist eli.l
not then share—recnlleclus sails% Plassitiff towns. in
Mrs. Hisit's—..ititiseas wee Ire room 1,111•01 she
P:nuitdr sun Defendant were hol introwitiere!—
Ilusnt s.i.l .Ise •esalsl s.i itWilk to Ira—it aa.
the swot,: of slur y,ar Iso7—vottora. thinks the
apriag lanuitits we April, May, sisal Jai, ...Alm
Mout ititto•toer.l the tan •liit•-• it* she Mi.. 44r'
wento—mottstNa kern irea PtaistilTu halted all sussed
Itefiriiiidott—l'laintiff kisi.rut the I)rfetplant--.
lam titests naikasr, urn she causal its,. rvening of the
third dal—tiar) walked in the trend hit they

got to the bead of the canal—there was or.
person with thew--they crossed the elitist bridge,
and walked slung the river through the fields—
they went out UT witness's sight—they turned MI by
Crosverasniarl by Mr. O'CoattgLL.
Witness professed the distillery business—never
heard a ganger violated au uncle for a distiller
—.there was a crowd on the canal, ladies and gentle-
men.--there were ladiesiu the room when Plaintiff
itiss.rl the Defendant--. Relieves they were well-con-
ducted simnel.— they were playing small playsa.i.
they had fmfen.--witurss and his wife lived toge-
ther about three mouths—the three mouths is The
frst year—be has not consoled himself for her ab-
sence ver—is in no besiness now—believes he owes
Mrs. Hunt something—did riot propose to her to go
to bed by dey-light to save candle-light.
To a question by the Court. -
Thinks it was in April the party at Mrs. Hunt's
was—can't say whether the kiss was in release of a
forfeit—witness kissed a lady for a forfeit—witneas
never had the pleasure of *roux the Dtlendaat shave
—they went out of or itsiese's right before be tinned
back.

Michael Hagmey examined bpi Mr. Goo Lot. •
Lives in now d; iota the 11114itita-t—she
vets in witness's house es u lodger, soul commenced
the kith August 1806—she *rot by the name of
Mrs. MiMishon—witness took her for a married WO.
tedto fur }lre or six weeks—no man scarcely ewer
curve to see her-4 ivoutatt used to come every day
to her with elm, butter, ftc.—ouitness said he would
go to her father; she would nut let hivo—lie then said
hr would go to Avereil Dill. but Plaintiff would not
let him, slid stud tire was Netter pleased to live with
Defendant as she was, than to be married to the best
man in the world.