The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser.
London, England, 1824-07-28 00:00:00

LAW IXTELLICENCE.

'COURT OF CHANCERY. TOZSDAT, Juir 27.

Mr. Alowwarat mewed for a liateas Corr* to remove a pri.
wirier, who wan at that moment in the Kinteß Bench, into the
flees primp& The committal had been abet y g.antrd b) the
Court.

The boon litaweet ton intimareel his sweat to the motion; I
and lidded, that the huainma of hearing licks: Corpus ;initiate
was n great hardship on the l'oun of Chancery. Ills lawdship
had had nt..tre or them in the last live year., than bit proletarian
had tar the last Mutt. This was very hard on his Lordship, par.
tioduriy when it would he remembered, that thee: was at the same
time twelve Joni:tea in Englintl, who were empowered by Act of
l'irliuntnt to dispose .1 these "-e'en in the long vacation, and nine
of them almost idle and unemployed in that long space ; it was a
very great hardship.
3lr Mut:Tiny admitted the hardship of the ewe. but reminded
his Imrdaltip, that the prisonm heti a right to chnove the Judge
before whom they wished to be brelight up: and, with every
respect for his lordship's opinion, he (Mr. Ikluntagn) would still
advise every client of his to prefer his Lordship ta every other
Judge an the lkitch, an great was his Lordship's care and
anxiety In the deposal of motions fur licks, rorpro, and, indeed,
of all other..

is a= rmixisrit. A . CPT.
The argument of this motion, fur the discharge of the bank-
rupt from prison, alter th• usual intaminations, had occupb.d this
last two days.
His Isordsliip declared this morning. that he had been employed
the greater pan 4 last night in examining Me documents. The
:issigners were right in calling on the commissioners to examine
the bankrupt, but the bankrupt was rot bound to answer ant hut
lawful questions. His Lordship, however, wsa of opinion, after
the moat lull coesideration of the subject, that it was the most us-
, satisfactory reanimation lie had ever seen. Ile could nor discharge
the bankrupt.
Mr. 3lioriTAC.U. for this bankmpt, thanked his Lordship for the
great attention which he had gismo to the subject. and was sure
(lilt his client would return to prima quits satin fied with his Lord-
ship's present decision.

NARVII:11, v. NICHOI.IIOII' •ND !KELLY.

The fActi or this ease were briefly thane:-3r. Nicholson, Sr
enn. on architect, compiled and sold the Architectural Dictionary
to Mr. Batheld, and covenanted at the saws tine riot to publish

any workllllffil which may be injurious to the ask of k. He, biomes,
144,11ig I.Y. eisechecgdifilthen, harra
position or the Prariicat Bnilol
d er. 111 r. Betide Med a a bill, ebth-
plainirsa of the Practical Builder as a piracy _ham the Architec-
tural Dictionoey, and at the same time obtained so Injunction to
restrain Mr. Kelly farm publishing any farther numbers of the
Practical Builde!. The Vice-Chaneellor hooldod that than was
no piracy in the cue. The plaintiffs appealed so the lewd Chan-
cellor. The di feudal,' prayed ftir a dissolution of the Wrung&
His 1,0 R0,7111i, gave judgment on the polo this mining. The
first question anti. in his andship's opinion, whether the Practical'
tisilder was a piracy fmui the A rehiterteiral Dietlontimita
Lordship was not deeply versed in architecture. bat V the
resolved .0 suni on the gruundof piracy, he should sad iopoint
to be tried before a Jury.
Mr. illeat.o stated, that if any difficulties to the success of the
issue appeared in his Lordship's tuind, his clients would not ask •
trial on the piracy.
The Lotto CII C I. Lott resumed. Mr. Peter Nicholson sold
his work of the Art-hike/oral Dictionary to Mr. Barfield for 2VM.
aid also entered into it covenant not to write, print, et publish the
same, or a similar, or any work which could injure the ode of that
work which he had sold to Mr. Barfield. The next question was,
whether, looking at that covenant, Mr. Nicholson was to 're sup-
posed to have been aware he had executed such an instrument; and
there could not be a doubt that be was. If an action for the breach
of the covenant were brought against Nicholson, the question wadi'
be, whether the Practical Builder was a work calculated to injure
the sale of the Architectural Dictionary. That would be the point
for the Jury. Mr. Nicholson's tint objection was, that the cove-
nut was bad in point of policy ; the second, that the Architeetwrat
Dictionary, which he had compiled for Mr. Barfield, was not an
original work. The defence which Mr. Kelly set up was, that his
Practical Builder was, with the exception of the designs. com-
piled fmtn old works ; that he had not imitated or pirated from the
Architectural Dictionary ; and that the resemblenee between the
works was but the necessary similitude resulting from the sernemos
of the subject ; that he had embarked more than 30,0U01. in the
publication of his work, end would suffer serious injury if the in-
junction should not be dissolved ; and lastly, that he had not been
aware of the existence of the covenant between Barfield and Ni-
cholson. The first question for his lordship would be, whether
the Practical Baader was published as: work tending to injure the
sale of the Dictionary ; and on this his Loedshin was of opinion,
that, beteg published as the production of Mr. Nicholson, an
eminent architect, it was calculated to injure it more than say odur
work, Not known to be Mr. Nicholson's, could do. The Next was,
whether VI. Kelly, assisting Mr. Nicholson to publish that work,
was not aiding and abetting Mr. Nicholson to a breach of the cove-
nant; on this his Lordship would decide in the allirmative. Mr.
Kelly could not, consistently with the principles of the Court of
Equity, continue to publish such a work : he should @abash to the
continuation of the injunction spina him ; but it would be an
injunction, not restraining iiitu from publishing a Practical Builder,
but from publishing hobos 's Practical BuUhr, or any archi-
tectural week bearing Nicholson's name. lie should got rid of Mr.
Nicholson's wistaria altogether.

1 MUR? OP ewers PICENCIT, Tinesliar, Jerair 17.
Sittings in Landau of r Trinity Trine, berate the LORD CHIEF
Ji. g f ICE and a Nveliii Juiy.

LIBEL.

At'STl!‘ 1% POPTP! AND °THEM/.
Mr. Churns:Et. opened the pleadings, and stated that the
plaintiff had been ehurchwanlen of this parish of Mile End Old
Town, and in that character received AMU. for the use of the in.
habitants, which be invested in an East India Bond for the bentlit
of the inhabitants. The defendants published a libel, imputing
fraud and falsehood to the plaintiff with respect to this sum of 2111 H.
Mr. SCAMLETT detailed the circumstances at length. The
money was aid by the Regent's Canal Company. The sum in
' question had been paid in part, and Mr. Atisun had invested it in
an East India Bond, in order to procure the advantage of interest.
In every parish—no doubt for the benefit of the public--there was
a minority and that minority was of course always in the right.
The defendants were members of the minority in this parish. The
accounts of the churchwardens were published quarterly, and, he
must infomi them, this WAS a very useful practice. The minority
thought proper to re-publish the accounts in which the 2no/. were
stated to have been invested in an India blond 1 21. Ills. 2d. were en-
tered as interest. In their comments upon these accounts, the
piece of ground for which the money was paid, and which was
called Rhudeswell, they entitled 'Cognomen, in italics. They also
said that inquiry had been made, and it hail been found that no
India Bond had at all been purchased, and that Mr. Austin, when
this was stated to Win, had only replied, •• 0, then, you must
charge me with the interest." The object of this malicious publi.
cation was to get favourite churchwardens of their own elected. In
that they failed. He had entered all the particulars upon the re.
cord, ht onto. to prove the falsehood of all the charges, well know-
ing that the defendants could nut enter a justification. The plain-1
tiff was a man of opulence and great respects'ility. Money Mail
not his object, but to clear his character from aspersions !mita.'
unity attempted to be thrown upon it.
Mr. John .lures, attorney for the parish. proved the transaction
between the parish and the Ilegcnt's Canal Company, for the piece
of ground called Illtudeswell.
l'roast-exantined.—l have heard it called ltopnwell.
LORD 4.11111:V JUATICE—I• the published account itself it is
called Rhodeswell, which is the best evidence against the defend-
ants if there is any thing in it.
Riehant Muller bought the India blond for the plaintiff:
William Relharn, acting vestry clerk, proved that the vestry
meeting in February, 11i22. was very numerously attended. Mr.
Austin made a communieatMn respecting a bond fee 21111. received
from the Cana/ Company. \Fitness did not see the bond.
Cross-esantmed.-111r. Itoote was nor there, nor Mr. Carpenter;
I think Mr. Malty was, and Mr. Harris.
Mr. Hall.--I was at the meeting; heard Mr. Austin make the
communication. I had seen the papers previously. I think two or
' three pinions esantinal them. Fite hood exceeded the amount in
1 his bawls of parish nioney. (in the Ilith May, 11122, I was present
at a vestry merging Mr the hamlet. Mr..tust in stated that he had
the India Bond, and that he was ready to pay the interest that had
accrued upon it. Some one observed, that it was an unnecessary
proceeding to have purchased it. Ile asked whether he should
sell the band. and pay over the proceeds to the overseers. Mr.
Duncan. now churchwarden, saul it would be better to pay over the
principal and interest to the overseers. A resultant', to that effect
was carried. ['File resolution was now wad. .daises. Alalpy and
!Innis were the overseas., The interest was 2/. 119 s. 2d. Messrs.
, Boon and Carpenter were then churchwardens. (Si, the 19th July
another vestry meeting was held, at which Mr. Carpenter was in
the chair. The aIIfIDODI then made their report, and it was ap-
proved. Unqualified thanks were VOlet! 10 the late enueenoardem,
and overseers. Special thanl.s to Mr. Attain were expressed, in
, terms which might have been matelot' tOr the winces of a parish
Hampden of the first .wrier. The resolution was canal by s ma-
, forty, and signed by the four defendants.
.• Crosaexamined by the ATTONNET.IiF.NERAI.—That has been
so well rend by you, that I suspect you penned it? I had a hand
. ir. it.—Sou were one et the majority ? I was. .
... .

The Loon Ctitt:r JUSTIC•
can't think the wince of hint fur that.
ll'itness re-examt ined-I'ller.. was a nevere eneeteat in the election
of churchwardens last year; a 31aNdurilas was skinhead, and a new
election took pluer.
The lAI 4.11111 Fr JrST ter recommerailial an arrangement be.
toren the majority and minority.
Mr. &Ica ni.r:r c said he haul no authority to that effect..
Mr. Duncan gave similar evidence to that of the hat witness.
l'ock, printer of the libel. proved the printio g by order of
the defendants. Ile printed 2.(100 copies, and &livered sortie to
CObjeeti ~,, . were mode to the personalit ie.. .1 Mr. !tens
ton gave orders to send ropes to each of the defendant..
I'rems.esaiiiined-1 believe a boy came for the copy. Mr. Var.
pettier told we nothing perwmal should he in the report. M y at.
tention was pointed to one of the note., which Mr. Carpenter said
should be struck out. and it was at Hoek out. Mr. Knott also oh.
jetted to it. Durum gave nor the manuscript with the four soma.
turew. I told Burton the objevinone made by Carper ter. but Bur.
ton still desired the olijection.ble T....age in be' in. tried. I saw
Maltby while they we re striking oil% Mr. 31abby disapproved of
any personalities K111%1%417. I Pell( %NM COrie. 10 ll'ood; which
never tame back to me t nor did I sec them iu cuenlation.
Jackson etattoined— I know lie writing of the defendants,
and believe the paper shown to me to be their writing.

3lr. Attorney-General.

Cook actin esia.-titite eras .
New of which I have meg Y deenlatipn.
The repeat of the cburchwerdens of !
Ned read, rontainicg the objectionable
*plaintiff.
Mr. Be n j. Smith examined by Mr. fit
years po Inhabitant of Able-End. and am
pot, Ir. Maltby. In Ao,,,tist of last ye
paper like emit now handed to me ?It
herald his telling me all the remit* wool
timer drys, at.tt to keep the thing e hem
Ile strongly objected to any personality,
fortunately outvoted.
Caws-examined —I carnet prniuce
nut ut mine took it oft* the table. I
I believe Mr. Henson to be in the m,
part v. 'Sermon acknowledged taking tt
ore him take it. I had no talk with 11
i °tines were in circulation of the .nme k'

Here the case for the plaintilffeloard.
Ain ATTOPINKT-Iltxmait. fiir do
he was sorry the time Oahe Court slim!.
bles. The defendants were very reeves,
intention whatsoever of casting the slit,
plaintiff. It was proved that Mr. Au aii,
and he publicly shelved it ; but the defend,
that ocemion. Ma. Austin had no right •
India bond, and froht the manner in whi
was some reason to doubt the nature of ti
purchased for the parish, Mr. Austin foul
counted for it as he did. Thp question '
the defes•lanta imetion .he alleged libel
the very reverse. They protested Kahn
mediately desired Mr. Wood not to pan
1101 the pan Mating to Mr. Austin was e
enmity reinonetrated against what
laffiecing the character of Mr. Austin. _
was a fair one, inasmuch as It gam ...
1 rich espenditura, and win only sanctioned
with the understanding that nothing
mined in it. Mr. Carpenter told Cox,
the particular passage espunced ; but ,
It was inststed, but inserted on the authorit:
soon as the defendants found this passage i
tested against it, and direction* were gives s.. .
.113
sew set primed. Where thee was /Wig. MI _ ....4 St a+
Mr. Button 011dt/task to hale the paper pnletesis 6•12134
otker the !dyke, as yell ad dm err the
lonised, asnastfy so
ants had had with him. I( this Cams any, sere
publishers of tb, papet, be waa quite sure all the ci
ig
the case decidedly negatived my Ong in the shaper
defendants might bete acted fooaddy, but not m ; 010
sever, as any 00HISIIIH. /*We or pgivate, had ant diapute ',-
Int with MnAuotis t they had so*ronal aniesseetg .
2it exidnioi they ',Wilt the parish Alan ter ehl ,
!is,
but sot to take away the elhanietee et e ntiff;
=ef °bislang any its 'Mama over MIL ,Idle '
) would milt pintoes to prove dr
spinet the objectionable passage, and
expected a verdict for the defendants.
3:r. Burton examined.—l em SO
prepared the accounts of the parish.
dress which accompanies the accounts.
script to the Meeting.
,Mr. Hirt and
present. It was read over, and those t
personal allusion. There was a second '
a proof of what was agreed to at the
two Meetings I remember that a part a_
ter also objected to the heading of the paper
I desired Cock to get me an original .
Meeting. At the second Meeting tb
fi
eluded. The paper was brought by ,
1 shown me is the heat Annual Report
me was brought to the keeond Meeting
that I desired Cox to print the Report's r
him. Mr. Bin and Alr. Carpenter said
count with that note in It. They sit
.. tre sign the account alone." They
printing, but left it entirely to nirsell
' Cock the next evening. At the close
came and signed the account, with the
port was not to contain any personal r
on Mr. Maltby, who objected to sign .
had done so. I obtained his eignatut
print it. The day alter I received a
The directions I gave to Cock were to
in the original. 1 did not look after it
'Mend I had no authority from them
ten copies which never passed nut of •
me was published in the October I,
di/authority of the Committee to print
the new election, and pending the appThe origami of the parish were considers
Crees-esamined-1 have been I years ,
I The Committee was a volontary essocian
&aim, and the four defendants were of f
lamer was obtained in Jose, 1023, and
place till the October following. It wr
when the election Should take place
take place immediately. and the feet
in the interim. I was never aped
printing. In September, on my wormr
number was printed ; 1 heard three day.
pia fat the lint edition of theM•pem
le Bares and Mills, but they w
tr.re Cock recalled-1 sent one of
and he brought it back to me with certain
others to be corrected as he had marked .'
or five fresh proofs, which I gave. M 7
and I printed on the 18tb September
ti. aside passages. I saw Mr. Mal,
but gave me no directions ; 1 saw : _
alter the first edition was published,
brought the proof; 1 was paid by one
Mr. Wood examined—l am Clerk ,
Hamlet of Mile-end. 1 know that Bt,
wan present when he read the manmerh
no note appended to the account. Bin a
desired that their names might not appear
particularly Mr. Carpenter, who said he
facts alleged, and did not wish his omit
copies have always been in my poesessl
they always have been ionise lock and I .
Crosx-examined—A t the time 1 locked
the defendants was not lowught.
3lr. Peter Bacon examined-1 wi
accounts were produced ; Mr. Dirt
they were pressed to sip the note,
heard they signed it. Mr. Packer \
business of the evening could not be
Mr. Sc sate:TT, in reply, stated,
the libel, no one attempt wan made 1
defendants, as they were called, to
Mr. Austin. The publication of
and it was for the Jury to say, by I
of the conduct of the defendants at
and to-tjay in the defence which the,
The Loan Cit te e :1 It ST le F. recap'
Jut 7, and left the question of dant-
.] he Jury consulted for a few nit
tiff—Damages 130 f. and ills. costs.
SMITH 1.. '
Al r. SC•It LETT said, that this
plaintiff; a pocket:hook maker. agal
fur having given a false character to
hani, who wits formerly a ffour-famt
11118. In January, lel. he reedy,
Mr. Smith's passing through Hirai.
ham over a handsome shop-door, in thc
book line, and he had no objection to ts.
Twineham gave, but before she obtained
clerk requiem! a reference, which waa '
dant. In January, 1821, Twinthani
and in February, only one month at'•
meter. which certainly was false,
brought to recover hum the defend
sold to Twineham on defendant's
hint) was a solvent penman.
A servant of the plaintiff proved
and also the references to Messrs.
Bowden, of Aldermanbury, as '
ham.

The bilk of pateeh were put in
dlr. ATTOUNEY-OEWERAI. si
dant was trustee for Mrs. Twinch
given to her. His client, who was
not further resist the demand.
Verdict for theplaintill:

COURT OF COMMON
Tr ESDA

liofiffe the CHIEF JI'STIV
ASSAI
JCIH HAHN

Mr. ANDREWS opened the plead
Mr. Sergeant l's:s 1. appeared for t
tion brought against the defendant
communal by him on the high seas.
ing to this country front Jamaica,
the defendant, Sisk. was Captain.
of June. and arose out of the folks,
%engem had engaged the cabin, for
iteration to the Captain. The phi
ing to agreement. be the defendam
per on the tih of June, in the t
the steward to bring him some spi,
ever, countermanded the older, and
to be supplied. An altercation
which constituted the ground of ti
James Talon esamined.—Witni
time, who is r persist of great reaped
were passengers together on hoard tt
protrisiens than what they agreed u,
to furnish them with spirits. On
the plair.tiff desired the steward to ft
wane; whereon, the Captain (Sisk'
his own, and on learning that be hi
he supplinl with note. Capt. Johns
on ,Johnson again asking. and SW!
••• it way the act of a tyrant, but he
Hereupon Sisk threatened • , order h
said it was his, and that he had paid
that he nright order him anywhere, •
or words to that area, and added,

I
•' , 1..
, • 1 .1
another sat printed 011,11 S, ' 1
m.
! Mile-End was then put In
passages eoniplained of by
it:a:icy-I Fare been many
am ..rqualr,ted with &feu- • ;
year he called upon me with
Nothing panicular occurred . .
mild be distributed in two or
:rd. which I prom:l;44rd to do. .
y, but said he had been Mi.
the cony given to me ; a te•
saw no o:her is rirculatitin. 1 l
sayority, or i:. Ale. Auatia's ,,
Ihe copy ewe. , but I did nut t
Ir. Austin about it. I beard • ,
kind.
the defendants observed, tl it .... (I !I
ild he wasted in perish slur!). • - il
viable gentlemen, and bad no ,
'tighten imputation on the o r
.uktin bought the India bona,
efentiants were not present on . . .
lit to lay out the Money in an . ! I
which the matter elosesS, there
if the trammetler. If k were
could not have afterwards pc•
in here foe the Jury was, did
set. Ile aas instructed to say
anal any penottality, andito •
an with any of the copies sir.
I expunged. The defendants j i ...,
was iftelined in the Report ea
. The objets of , the Report • ! s i
gave a natentent of the pa. r
snedened by the. defendants
ing permed should be coo- ' • Si
Cox. the primer, to have i
but Burton said, no, op. , ' k ,
luthority of Mt. liana 45
Inge in the report, they pro- .
: given to the sinter 60 hams li
,i ~
a there inn Order of nate . 1
•
taper
r..,F,,Te.4. • ..11.4'''`Z : l ! 4 1
rittaa7he • sea
t: sure a/11hr el -••
yg ia the shay! ig ?.."! .
....._.
le, bet set in ' ; Sign ,
. ' ri
leen. aey , - COD- • if
OMNI MM. , i : •
Nigh `.! le dile ,
I I
title , • die
teltermtgli. en r. Abalpitop , . .
dna I I, 1 i
al trialithiany had doefildirerfri:
i inhabitant of .11M1! End, god •
h. lam the author of the ed-
s. It was presented in nagm. . I A
and Mrs Carpenter were then ,
.
we gentlemen objected toul 1
a Meeting. at which I t 1,
to first Weetiog. Iktireen i
rt was struck out.
_Pr. Cr9se•
e piper; so out.
if sic iota me.
tel proof to take tts the second
tbe objectionable part *seta.
y Mt, Carpetna. The Report
t ; but the one now handed to 1
rting by Mr. Carpenter. After
1 '
ort's as I had originally directed I
said they would not sign an ac- . .
I signs 1 the account, saying.--
ley gave no directions as to the V. i
!self. I took tile paper ter Mr. , . (
lore of the Meeting Mr. Mule # • ..
'
he understanding that the Re.
I tenements. I called peat day
n it. until I told brim the advent t
avid, and took it to tack to ..
a communication from Cock. 1
to print the paper as I gave it, :, . r
rit lying the Tinting I con. '1
,
mto Insert the,' note." I had . i
my hands. The peper handed
foliating. I considered I bad
riot the report, preparatory to . I
application for a Mandamus
ideftd rts of the crahmittoe. 1 1
rears an inhabitant of the =
iodation tr; set aside the
re of the Committee. The nes-
and I can't tell why delay took
was often a subject of dianteene • • 411.
• ; some wished the election to .
t is, that the accounts were pub- . r
applied to foe the payment a
ening to town. I heard • heelb
r days ago from Mr. flirt diet be • flt
lapin, m=matirbriesser- -
were sot •
r the proofs to Kr. Catenate,.
certain passages expunged, and
irked 'hem. I then printed fact
Mr. C. Burton called afterwards.
ler an edition without the objec..
!thy, he objected to the notes.
Mr. Austin in eight or ten data . •
led, and I told hint Burton had t •
one of the defendants, Mr. Birt.
rk to the Trustees for lighting the
t Burton drew op the accounts I I
li
script; when it was read there watt
tint and Carpenter more than once .
t appear to any thing personal.
aid he knew nothing about the • 1
name to appear. The first 2,111nt
session, and are now in Court ;
and key. . 11; !
locked them up the action against -1!
was at the Committee when the • . i '
t and Mr. Carpenter dandier, ; •
, and objected to it ; afterwards I
r said, it they did not sign it the
be got through.
ted, that since the publication of
le by any one of Muse unwilling
o fifer the slightest reparation is ' t
f the libel could not be doubted.
r their wentiet, wha. they thought
1
I the title of publishing the libel, ,
~
hey set up.
recapitulated the evidence to the . 1;
cages fur their consideration.
minutes, and found for the pair.. k"
RoWDEN.
was an action brought by the
'gains* the defendant. an attorney,
to a person of the same of Twine- I
acct, and became a bankrupt in
ir
ived his certificate. A rink of I
tent-street saw the name of Twine-
in the writing-desk and pocket- tr
oftto take an order which An.
obtained the goods, Mr. Smith's
was given so the present defer-
am only received his certificate,
after. defendant gave him • eha.
se This action was, therefore :
idiot the anicont of the good
i representation, that he tTwine-
sl the order gives and Imated,. s
a. Longman and Co., anti Mr.
to the solvency of Mt. Twine-
ti land read, when a
raid, the fact was. test the been-
ism, and thought the credit was
is a respectable saboltor, Inidd
. • h•, 'ir
. ,
i PLEAS. GEILDNALL, i
v,Jrxr 27.
ice. mid a Special Jerry.
n t. star. • 4
railings. 1
for the plaintiff. This was an N.
ant for an assault on the plaietill,
ea. Captain Johnson was resole-
. • I
,ow h efoard the Sovereign, wildek
. The areaub occonal on die 41k
nwing eireannitswicest-Tbo po-
w which they paid a large revs- i' I . .*
) Dirdl' was to be tumefied, accord-
nt, with spirits. Whiles at sup-
..4lmuerte rear. the plaintiff ordered
Mats. The Captain (Sisk). 000-
eel would not permit the plaintiff' ..
anise, which ended in the &remit
the present action. i
mess has known the plaintiffs long
pectability. The plaintiff and he
I the elovretign. They took more
upon. The defendant had agreed
r
In the th of Jane. after supper,
s furnish him with some rum and I p
110 asked if he had any spirits of
had not. he desired that he should ir r 4
nsun said he had a right to it, and ' • . i.
sk refusinyr, the former said, that .
e should net tyrannise over hint."
r hint out of the cabin. Johnson
ail dearly for it. Melt replied.
e, for that this was he own bones.
1, that if he were where he main
- -
se