The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser.
London, England, 1809-12-21 00:00:00

,

•
• . . .41 . • •
✓ IN TApilyrkiti
T OrefI'ANCEIRY, bac. fin.
D. FRAM La PLoWnEN. ESQ.
rilanuTT moved, that the injunction
4114 d be dissolved. it -was granted'
.11t4 the Deferefeertseld the Plain-
-414 of a baink, c.filied The Me-
al Yeeleete4 awl that he sister-
d eta. coutenja,,,,in a antmequent
died 7%1 klifelfry of Ireland 'rile
el contentlede:that the latter 'ark
distinct from the former; alt bough it
the seine subject, it was not piracy.
ltostim.v. Counsel for the Plain.
that the Defendant's thetory of
ted the same subject matter as
he had sold the Plaintiff. For
ether, there was not a particle of
h was sufficient to prove the piracy,
injunction.
HA mcaLLoa being obliged &. attend
Levee, postponed hearing Sir As-
reply, until to-morrow. His Ho.
ea of the !tow, presided the re-
day, but nothing of public interest
• BENcti, GUILDHALL, Dec. so.
—.—
i Prins, brforr Lord ELLENtto-
CH. end e Special Jury.
ELLIOTT V.
action, to reCover, from the D-.-
mount of a policy of 111.11r4tice,
to have mad:: on the ehip
i:e-Garr ER-A, I. stated, that the De-
rived instructions to ellect an in-
ship Mary, bound to Spain. She
nrt of Ferrol, anti was seized let the
. The breeher of the Defendant
ructions, be reeidnig in York, to in-
the amount of 2.6u01. the Defend-
Leith, undertook to ellect a policy
per Ceut. ; aed the remainder was
sod since paid, on the account of the
-The Plaintiff applied to the De-
the mere broker fur the policy; this
4, but sent a pretended copy of it.
taus would not entitle the Plaintiff
the Defendant's bring pressed for
ry, he-refused, until the premium
was iiiiiiiPdiately acceded to; but
inter Ml* policy for 10001. the
it* tliver one 5001. and one tor
ht 4 Mr ooi ;lit ihat of 5001. the
to ens set forth•as the insurer, rinite
copy originally delivered. It also
'wed of theiriesuring for general
notions were givenrthey only spe-
:,' rehick id notnerlilige the insurers
le far the loielliider the present
On, a asinuter'itispection of the
And, that the 'rota* on two of them
enbAlquent•to•thetime the policies
Se ht a of theot, to be earcutedi
1802, 'send the stamps were dated
to Starhp-office in August io the
der there circumstances. Mr. AT-
al. cardinals:J. that the Plaintiff
vordict t it was necessary that such
be suppressed, otherwise the fair
t caiet.

, the brother of the Defendant, de-
rent the order to bir brother to ef-
t fur 10001. on the ship Mary, for
a all lie, the witness, re-
from Mr. Coutean,
eaansisration lay Mr. PARR, he said
tiliker die policy; by the return of
1)40 out, which he immediately
Mr. (3auteatt; aCcompanted by a
that Me policy did not warrant to
as the ofheirrlid.
n said, that he •tuitfer•tuod the fact
Defendant's cm:feting-house hid
edi'every paper token out of it,
he- Di!liideat.tit- get new policies ;
iroperty, not defraud the
at oleo gOtTreali stainps.
roauun observed; he tea of opi-
Inmeit'us- Itl tW kt any other policy,
ich irtslirdr4d to he of 10001.
deposed:li* gave orders to the last
the different insurances. and tha.
rd that the polies for the 10001,
in a single policy, was after he lie"
rprise at the
.atarep on two of the
a later date than the execution of
themselres.
BOROUGH —l' Mr. Park, can yon-
any of thretepersons whom you al-,
gned the first policy ? *lf such a
surely they ought to be here; even
oof, that this libery took place,
been instricia'to assert. The
d, appears tab improbehte ; and
the single volley for 10001. was
fit was, there would not have been
for the stamps to the other policies,
*nets of the Stimp-Office, on au
affidavit, that the original policy
torrid have renetred it.
• My Lord, Tarn without witnesses
then directed the Jury to And a
Plaintiff, which they accordingly
idinterest.
USHER S. ROBLE.
ted, this was an action on a Policy
'he ship Miranda, by the refusal of
Jock Company to admit her into
roper time, was thriven out into the
rived a serious injury ; by chili
was damaged. The Plaintiff, who
of the ship, brought an action
dndra Dick Company. which was
miter, before his Lordship, and a
the Plaintiff, allowing tke market-
r. which was much less than the
/red at, or insured by the Defend.
was effected on the invoice, and
n was brouoht to recover the dif-
the rearketteßtice and the invoice.
ire it wan pot n question for the
hiefly to (Weller's, a point of law.
'ere. that hie Lordship might order
out, so RS it might be argued at
'4Ol/44t had paid seep- per cent.

r•