The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser.
London, England, 1825-07-06 00:00:00

•
ceodinglOmpepsdit esitpilimant M dis =SEM au ll timibesie of the '
petition&
Sir H. HARJANOS mid thettlispaseglihe , beta al-
luded ao,nsd be bald it in hie hstridg was ads nature.
IlLbsdillft limed that dess psblipplas seep at the
oMmes alreilk MS MOO mmeadi agibaNins.
He coaltierit ..eitisidf ei Mandist soy Asa daidd be faSt,
of a calumny so itiellad, so hasson mum, end so
vo "MP ia,sloM dim Rai. Weed alt soy ofrbstif.2l67ll
man avoid lons been ty of endisitsselmpideloantopipliiisst the
Duke of VI He wee MAl** fogy pasaillied. skholdh
the pamphlet biro of the wad/a baying some of his Infer.
maws Frew ant sesseas, It woo Wady. impossible that Sir
Thomas WA" am& hose blabbed lisfammuon of that nature.
No, he emild nut eeemeedo sisob an ides t but he nevertheiTSS was
sot altehinbeg kw hen she empieloss deist somehow libeller bad
abused tit, ceedientel if illa T. Hidop, and to that way obtained
informades whilli he sushi Oat adliel have acquired. After a
few fumble sharessistis ramming ateMpensation for the destrue.
two of soots palms is Indio, he odd la conclusion, that the Duke
in Wellington lied mud with if. pessible care and caution, and
had proceeded tbrosslisat soda, Nis advise of the law . officers of
the Ceown.
Dlr. BROUGHAM, in hiedes Ils lee* Weed, would altogether
acquit him of writing the peetshist ; k was sat in his way. He
had read only half of it, asimspeethig that portion at least of it lie
would say that it was bath able eel menet. He took for granted
that sufficient to justify the epithets of die Gallant Officer oppo-
site would be found in them*. which he i Mr, Brougham) had
not read; but had it not hew ippm Ihr the
seassertions of that
Gallant Officer (Sir H. flame)be wee love talented that the
whole of the pamphlet was ef the sow charmer with the part he
reed—that It was both able NM teeensenta On a full view of the
cue he could not but my that the Deb of Wellington and Mr.
Arbuthnot did opt take the Net means of vindicating
themselves from the eassaisee Hue east upon them.
Instead of having Heamirshie 2111111111011 in Chet House riving up
to Year testimony to the ophidians and parity of their characters,
they should at once proceed ts this* aseoplete. legitimate, and ef-
fectual way of repars aelemethee ul'k which they had been
aseadied—they s Meg their Od (Hear, es. ham, hear.
Lead latuglitelriL ins des dean way, they should . bring
the* action. Gadd it fteareet se have a seed cha.
racier given in that It= his Gasp/ the Debt of Wellington
a Judge and Jury should demeedest do quirtiee and by • verdict
it should be aacertained wide► pselg Susie Ate veils.
After a few wards from Sir. H. Hamm Jot and Dr. Ll:tunas-
TON the Petition was ordered to be printed.
CAP OF GOOD HOPS.
Mr. BROUGHAM ted a Petition from Bishop Burnett,
onnplaining of the of bertitberies Somerset.
Hr. HUH& then one, sod was undetstood to advert to the dill.
colds, which the Petitioner lead to encounter for want of means to
proceed to the Cape of Good Hope.
Mr. Secretary CA NNIN G asked was it because an individual had
Amin pepper to scone • public officer, that the Government
tberao Las were to furnish Mtn with money ?
Dlr. IlUilf explained that that was not his meaning. The pe-
titioser had 111004. boolobed frost the Colony for a period of five
yeses, =I sm set yet expired, and as it was material foe the
substan of his ease that he should proceed to the Cape, all
that he thee wasted to know was, whether, under existing eir.
' eamstano4, be wee at liberty to do so.
Mr. W. HORTON said that if the petitioner could show that
it was to #romota the ends of justice and not advance his own private
objects in going to the Cape, his case should receive favourable con.
' sideration.
The Petition was then brought up, and oedered to be printed.
CORPORATION OF NEWBERY.

Mr. BROUGHAM presented • petition from George Gray,
complaining of certain privileges belonging to or assumed by the
Corpc,ration of Newberry, in the coudty of Berks.

- -
ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE IN IRELAND.
Mr. BROUGHAM nee to resent a petition of rather an ex.
traordinary chancier, it came from Ireland,complaining of op
sion and severity exercised upon a poor man there, on proceedings
arising out of a civil bill process, in the court of the Assistic.t
Banister, where the poor man resided. It was a lithe use,
and he (Mr. Brougham) could not but :..implain that clergy.
men sitting u Magistrates had been active in the tappet:melon ofthe
petitioner.
After a few words from Mr. (RATTAN, thi petition was
I brought up and ordered to lie on the table.
-------- -