The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser.
London, England, 1825-11-01 00:00:00

otherwise he would have gone na Savannah In opreferenbe!
Providence, Inasmuch we materials were much mare easily'
at the farmer than at the latter place. He would have
the wreeLers to have plintesl him, because hr knew them, b
natural Mt a stranger to be somewhat mistrustful. They
much like our own people; that is, they wanted a good deal
looking after, and would embrace any opportunity that •
take advantage of a stranger. (A laugh.)
Sergeant VADOHAN said he was disappointed
ne.as, and should not roceed to call any more persons t
of his case, as he would not tempt his fate further. t
Mr. Hann ts0:1, the defendant's Attorney was called,
to prove n tender of 400/. II!. Id. including the M. 21. ltd..
was admitted the defendant was liable ; but the Lord Chief
considered that ire. had not s lie xxlet in doing en, inasmuch,
tender of the aggregate aunt for which the whole of
members of the association were liable, could not be
tendref a specific sum for which the present action
against the defendant, as ore only of those inembets.
This closed the defence.
Mr. Sergeant TAnDY, in reply, contended that no .
been made out against his client ; Ltd that the supposition
existence of fraud was monstrous ; for if there ran any
only must hie client be implicated, but all the other
had any concern in the transaction at Savannah, and to
possible Mt so many individuals to be guilty of such gross
minable conduct, without any assignable motive, was'
for refutation. Butt even admitting there had been fraud
question was not whether there was any ground of suspicion
cthoemppelaftennttiff, but
iage whether
,whp it
t a
surely llywCOUouli cut
dd
not be said
henitdwjaTlaglionae,nt
to the conspiracy to defraud the defendant. This judgment,
fore, not having been at all impeached, it was impossible
Jur7 could now attect it by a verdict.
The Loan CHIEF JNITICE. in summing up II
observed, that the manner in widen he should leave
to the Jury was, whether the conduct of the plaintiff!
upright in going to Savannah, and also while rentehn
place. The question here was nee whether the Learned
decreed the salvage was right upon all the fart,' ethat
him, but whether- all those facts were producedttliat
ought to have been produced. If not, then his judgment
good for nothing. The verdict must be for the *MO
the defendant had failed to prove his temiel• ; but they
company that verdict with tin expression of their opinit
/Mmes.', or otherwise of the defendant's conduct under
eumstances.

The Jury retired for about an hour, and then return;
verdict for the plaintiff, saying, that in going to Sam
justltiable, but that his conduct afterward% wan fraUdul
• This canseoteupied the Court the Whole day, aid'
aludoi till eight In tile evening.
STATE OF THE COMITT. -
Notwithstanding certain promises matte fast Term
atituted nuthotitiex. that /tome very necessary alterati
Court should be effected during the vacation, there sG
same want of accommodation to those for ',torn the att.
fa appropriated, and in the course of the day his I,orialiii
than once complained of the coidn as of the Court, land grit'
reason, for what with the height of it, and the six doub'
that are constantly floning the air, oge might as well
o: the top of Salisbury crags; but then again, if that
rented piece of handy work with which the Court is '
been performing its functions. we should have had t
of a choaking and suffocating atmosphere that would
ten times more objectionable. Surely the ingenuity
men can soon obviate these inconveniences.

INSOLVENT DEBTORS' COURT, Mowriaw,
•
Wm. Stoney, a commission agent, was opposed by ,
on behalf of 31r. Fawcett, a lincntiraper, residing at No.
aide.

• It appeared in evidenec, that the insolvent had applied
posing creditor, and pun:lt:iced carpeting to the couture
and upwards, when he left a bill of eacJiattge drawn I,
and accepted by Thomas Harrison, who keeps a litp
Fleet-market,
The opposing creditor stated that the Insolvent told It
received the bill from Harrison, on account for paint
papering twenty-nine houses, which he (Ilatrison) had
Paddington. When witness went to Mr. Harrison .-
Jutteiryn,oititeottioisltdanliliiimog iitt,tincsh al
assurance
and
would be
the bill was di..
Il'itness repeated his application, when Ihirrivon said,
nut give a receipt to the bill for,a glass of gin. I paid it t
named Jacobs.
Witness then applied to the insolvent, who stated
bills of Lord Teynham's t r dispose of, and for which he. \
ceiee 25 per cent: army tt pun what he got rid of, and nut
receipts he would take up the bill ; but he never performed
mine, and the result was, the opposing creditor I/created
insolvent and Harrison.

Mr. BARRY submitted to the Court that the insolvent
guilty et gross fraud, and obtained goods front fns client
of false pretences.
111 r. per contra, contended, that as the bill t
WAR left several days with the opposing creditor for him
ir.qtairieis and use his option as to whether lie would place
count or nut, there could have been no fraud committed, t
.pre Harrison's responsibility thst the bill was reetived
goods delivered.
Mr. Commissioner Law was clearly of opinion that It
been committed. so as to warrant him to detain the insolvent
prison ; he should therefore pronounce Um entitled to the benefit
sought.

•
mementallostailifisr-1
h in opeefesefigglgrenge
ich more eadirglisfilfild
!e would hail essiiklyed
r knew them, but It was
tistrustful. They were
wanted a good deal or i•
ortunity that (Cured to
ieappointed in this wit.
we persons on this pert
'lather. tlottgitter.,
ey was called, In order
the St. 2a. lid. which it ,
mitegille:hb3o.nli:od7orb'ernelut:ticerekhen'jarnmnamstraihewael
end action war brotolit
riembes.
r'ed that no fraud had
the supposition of the
ere ran any at all, net y•
the othn perwns who
halt, and to imagine It
• of such gnus and abo.
native, was too absurd
id been fraud, still the
Ind of suspicion again* .•
awn the judgment of h
e said was also a patty
This judgment, there.
was impossible that a
ling up the evidence,
old leave fbe question
e plaintiff wits rate and
ile remaining at that
is 'Rifted Judge who •
farts ettuit me bethre
alticenhat could and .
his judgment would be
r the phiintiff, because
• ; but they would tie-
' their opinion an to the • , ''
duct antler all the cir- •
hen returned, finding a ft
tg to Savannah he Was t.
vas fraudulent.
day, zed wag not con -
r RT. -
foe Term by the con.
ary alterations in this
there still exists the
lioni the student's bolt • it t
lay his Lordship more
Court, boll with good
the six double doors
ght as well be alma* •
ain, if diet newly in.
e Court is heated had t
have had to complain
that would have beet.
• I
ingenuity of our City I t
BOWhAY, OCT. 31. •
pposed by Air. Barry,
bug at isso. 2, Cheap•
had applied to the op-
o the amount of 31i:.
ige drawn by himself
cps a liquor-shop in
!vent told him that he
,unt for painting and
latrison) had built at
ll:tritium to make in-
would be paid when i 1
bill was dishonouted.
litrrkon said, " I will
1. I paid it to a perami
ho stated that-he had
for which he.was to re-
in of, anti out of which •
tver performed his pro-
(filar wrested both the
the insolvent had beets
m his client by moans
A the bill in question
41!
liter for him to make
would place it tdae-
-1 committed, for it was
was received and the
inion that no fraud hail
Detain the insolvent in
retitled to the benefit he
O▪
NDAY, OCT. 31.
°ARROW, and a Lou.
V officer, aged 44, stood
forged check for 117/..
•
I Co., bankers; and in
pearance, pleaded Not
d that the question fqr
nee, as it r,garded the
The Learned Counsel
hrs. Sansnm and Co.
Joseph (*teen end Co..
In the `23(11 of Jute a
171. was paid.
Green was the only
Co. lie beliersd
r.
e to the check was not
was not in town when
to sign the checks tot
ni but himself.
n 22 years of age. 1
tieh I lett in June las.
who lived in I.lppt,
I. I first knew Lim a.
I by Peckham to one
erica waked me for some
!rn several—they were •
1 gave them only the
'ilkinson. Both Jones
the checks in the even-
utters in the morning,
ein. I was seat for to
lestroyed. That stair •
.house. I tort Joan.
treelnirch-street. They
;me up stairs. They
After which, I went
hour afterwards I saw •
wan dictated in a blow
chain round his neel,
I then went back tt.
ad Peckham. We oh
r as London-bridge. 1
ism of wine. Jones anti
came out I saw the pri-
en came tip to me, and
['hey three went over to
backing-house. After
at public-house and in-
been there, and was in-.
Jones the same evenit*
01. front them. I saw the
lined with him at Peck-
ed 201. for preseming t.
he said he had weaved
hat was the only eon•
hint when presenting
'nen. I have described.
It was about a week
c respecting the cheek-
after he presented the
shout three years in the
tarties Jones and Peck-,
enter into a conspiracy
li
ling-houses with Jona, •
the Colonnade Coffee-
'hat is the forged cheek
have seen Berger with •
ecription of the person
lain that it was the ph.
,y cheek of that amount
elcoasyesinn .tbe
stnietmlepfklothesott
rge of forgery by that P
mole to that I heel=
trt Jones toot Negras-
del-plaee. Pentonwllle.
aim at his lodgings *
I pat bun at my own • ,
a lisawn Mr. *lotions.
kis him. Ile lived fee
I.lones's loigiags, esti •
Johasoo as a banher'S
in Myrelt last. I sew r .
it a gatitbling-hetas is t
j
,(4.
I
„.„
—r t
_„ .