The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser.
London, England, 1803-05-14 00:00:00

-mss-•.

A TAMC it PANT.
I.owd IN' AISINGH.IM moved that the ;knee
ehmehi:mlinurit to Mond.tv.
The I art of DAR N.I.EY and Earl STIN-
C;ltt said they shottld not oppose it, although
other tlpitg'n the Home, in the present state of un-
c‘rt.iinty,-chould sit this Liar.
After a few words from the Lord Chancellor, the
Msaion erns agreed to, and at half pant tep, the
I touse adjourneo till Monday.

HOUSE OF COMMONS.
ritinAv, MAY 13.
The London and Wesiminster'Coal Market Bill
was read a second time and committed, and it was
ordered that the Petitions against the Lill should be
referred to the same Committee.
Sir (IKORGF CORNWALL, Chairman of the
Selete Committee to try the Inuits of the Bishops-
Castle Eletiion, reported, that the Sittillg Member
was duly elefted, and that the Petition was frivolous
and ve,tltioirg.
Mt. BOYI) A T.EXANDER moved for, and ob-
tained leave to piing}, in a Bill to imFrova the Town
and I larbnut of fllasgow.
Sec;-11 Pahlic Acer!...nts were prftinted from the
C( mmissii errs of EseiNe,

;cm—
On the Motion of Mr. ATTORNEY GENE-
R A 1.. the Cimprovder and Naval Stores Indemnity
Bill was read a First titre.
Mr. ISAAC I IAWKINS BROWNE, Chairman
niche Committee on the Survey of the Highlands in
Scotland, brought up the Report, which was re-
ceived, and (Acted to be printed.
The House went into a Committee upon the Sil-
ver Bullion Bill,. and the Report was ordered to be
received on Monday next.
The Committee on the Medicine Aa was defer-
red till Monday.
The Bill to provide for the Families of Militia-
:nun, was read a third time.
Mr. ROSE stated he should defer making the
Report of the Committee on the Ilchester Elec-
tion till Monday, when it was his intention to move
that the Attorney General should prosecute the
pat tics.
ADJOURNMENT OF THE HOUSE.
Toni GRANVILLE LEVESON GOWER
" sir. I move that the House shall, at its rising,
a.ljoorn till to-morrow. Last Friday must be so
fresh in the memory of every Member, that I should
he trespassing on the time of the House in advert-
ing to what passed. The arguments of those who
opposed the longer adjournment failed, and the
majority determined, on the information of his
Majesty's Minister, to put themselves out of the
power of receiving any communication on the en-
suing day. It will be recolleeted, however, that
the intelligence received that day completely coo-
t-a/tidied the statement made by his Majesty's Mi-
nisters the preceding evening. After Parliament
had been info coed that Lord Whitworth had left
Paris on a certain day, it appears tiat matters of
sufficient importance to communicate to the House
did occur, and that the subjeCt deserved further
information. It appears Lard Whitworth was
detained by a new proposition on the part of
the French Government Ile might have remain-
ed at Paris in consequence of the -French Govern.
nient having acceded to the proposition of the
English Government. It may be so at thc pre-
sent moment; and therefore when it is possible
that the House may receive a communication of
such importance, I trust the House will be aetuated
by that consideration, and not put it out of its power
Is receive such a mumunication. I conclude then,
sir, by moving that this House do adjourn till to.
morrow.
The CIIANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER—
" I apprehend, Sir, that the objeCtion I feel to the
proposition of the Noble Lord who has just made
the motion, will render it impossible for the House
to entertain it. Such a motion, I wilt venture to
ray, never was submitted to the House. The
I lease, as a clatter of course, is adjourned to to-
morrow, and the Noble Lord could not determine
that it would be proposed to adjourn to any further
period, till after some of that business had been
gone through which co:stitutes the Orders of the
Day. He will forgive me, if I observe that, in my
opinicm, he has not been well advised in the course
he has adopted. I should have hoped that he would
have thought it a more Parliamentary line of con-
dnel to have given notice, that, after the ordinary
bpsiness of the day had been gone through, he
would have brought forward his motion; or, which
would have been the more proper way, that he
• Would have waited till that which is the usual no-
tice, unless Amy urgent business requires a different
one had been made, namely, that the House should
adjourn till a future day, in which case he might
have amended it or superseded it by another motion.
My obj:ition to the motion refers to its substance
and °llea the Noble Lord has said, that the cir-
cumstances which occurred last week, disproved the
statement of his Majesty's Ministers ; give me leave,
Sir, to say, he is not correa in that ; the statement
of his Majesty's Ministers was not that Lord Whit,
worth had departed from Paris. it was distinftly
stated by me this day se'nnight, that I could not
tell the fat, for that I had no knowledge of it. But
from the circumstance of General Andreossi, the
French Amhassador, having applied at the Foreign
Office for a Passport, and from the inferences natu-
rally arising out of other circumstances, I expressed
my firm conviCtion that Lerd Whitworth had quit-
ted Paris; I never said he had aCtually quitted Pa-
ris ; 1 had no intention of saying so at the time ; I
know not the fait, and I could not say so. Now, Sir,
the Noble Lord has expressed his regret that the
House did not sit on Saturday 1...5t, and he is of
opinion that many persons who obj..aed to the ad-
journment to Monday, and were in the minority,
must have regretted that such an adjournment took
place ; now l know of no circumstance attending
that adjournment that ought to esite the regret of
any Member of this House. Sure lam it ought
to be a matter of satisfaltion to all who supported
the motion, that the House did not sit on Saturday
last. I mean with regard to the circumstances that
might have resulted from the House sitting on that
day, and I beg the House will pardon me if I refrain
from stating my reasons—( Many of the Member' ex.
claimed then- ! Thar !)—Sir, it was my intention
to have proposed, if I had not been anticipated
by the motion k,f the Noble Lord, that this Howe
should have .adjourned till Monday, and I intended
. have moved it without any comment whatever, at
the same time perfeCtly prepared, if any question
should hlve been put to me, to have answered it as
as distinaiy as I possibly could, consistently with that
dot,' I owe the public, and the obligatiun imposed

,-

IMINm

.

en me, Ant to ewe that which, by Ise!ng pretriturely
disckased. mieht efre3 its interest. Sir, 'in Thid
1 000nicated my opinion with recttea to
turd Whitwortn') having set,otit on his j2torney
itvsn Paris,. I am nut now enabled to state any
•eotiinittnicatinn, or express any opinion w!,ether
he
if attualiy ee his %A!, to this country of not. But 1
prePaLi:d W express my prinion,ahmt there is no
probability of any isifoimation being received in time
to admit of any conimunicatinn being made to the
House to-nee-row, and it is on that ground I shall
hope the' Noble Laird will not persist in his motion.
If he does net, I shall be induced to move that this
House do adjourn till Monday." ,
Mr. CANNING.--“ Sir, the Right Hon. Gen-
tleman has stated two objedions ; one in point of
-form, and the other in. point of propriety. With
respell to the objection, in point of form, that such
a motion cannot proceed from the Chair, I
;have
only to say, that if it is informal, it must undergo
the ate of every other motion that is vicious or ir-
rovtlar in its nature ; hot until I hear it stated by
you I should be very mush inclined to doubt the
ho-olinds upon which he has put his assertion. On
the last Friday the Right Hon. Gentleman made
'the motion that the Ht.use should adjourn till Mon-
day ; so that an amendment was moved, that the
House should only adjourn till the next day ; that
motion, as it stood in its amended state, was precisely
the motion which my Hon. Friend has moved to-
day, andiaccording to the rules of the House, and
every principle of
.good sense, I cannot conceive the
consistency cf deliberating on the propriety of en-
tertaining a motion as originally put, and rejecting
it, though in the same terms, merely because it is
the result of an amendmeet. The objection, in
point of form, applies as much in one instance as in
another, and I cannot think why an objection should
be made now, when no objection was made then.
With regard tb the objeCtion in point of propriety
and substance, after the Right Hon. Gentleman
has stated from his own conviltion that the circum-
stance of the House meeting to-morrow would not
enable him to make a communication, I should not
wish to press the question to a division, but I think
the House should make this distinaion. The Right
Hon. Gentleman, on Friday last, stated, on French
authority, what he should have to do. He told us
he was to regulate his condtut by that of the French
Ambassador. I should hope, Sir, that what he
speaks to-day is not conjedural but known and po-
sitive. If this is the case it is not try wish to give
the House trouble unnecessarily, but if there is the
slightest chance of a communication being made,
and if I have not understood him that the House
meeting to-morrow must be useless, I should be in-
clined to press this motion to a division, whatever its
fate might be, in order, that those who feel as I do,
that this is not a time, when the House of Commons
should consult its ordinary usages, but that it ought,
as the natural and proper organ to convey infor-
mation from the Executive Government to the
Country, might chew the public that they are at
their posts. As I think a public communication
through the medium of Parliament, preferable to a
placard stuck up at the Stock Exchange ; and as I deem
a frank intimation on the state of the question of
war or peace, and the degree of just apprehension
of the former alternative, the proper mode of deal-
ing with the public • I therefore consider it would
better become the House of Commons to put them-
selves in a situation in which they could receive a
communication at the earliest possible moment, and
not at such a crisis make themselves a holiday only
because it is Satunlay."
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER.
I do not deny, Sir, that what I have stated is
fairly open to the observations of the Hon. Gen-
tleman, but, I address myseif to. you Sir, and ask,
whether in your recolleßion, for I hould be
ashamed to refer to my own, any motion ever was
made, with a view to an adjournment, that has been
expressed in any other terms, than merely that the
House should adjourn. The Hon. Gentleman has
not distindly understood what I stated. I stated
that I yea.: thoroughly convinced, that no infor-
mation would be received by his Majesty's Govern-
ment, in consequence of which any communication
from his Majesty could be made to this House.
I stated this, and I remain of opinion, that no com-
munication ought to be made from his Majesty,
till we know that the negotiation has terminated
satisfadorily, or till Lord Whitworth has arrived
in this country. But, I will go further, I see no
possibility. I know, Sir, lam irregular in saying
this, but I see no possibility of making any com-
munication whatever to the House, in the course
of to-morrow. If I even thought there was a
chance of such a communication, I should think
it incumbent on me to move the adjournment till
Monday, because, I cannot reconcile it with the
dignity of the British Parliament, and of the come,
try, that this blouse should sit on an ufiusual day;
solely for the purpose of receiviug a commune,
cation, not formal, not fit or becoming, and on
which no inquiry could be immediately instituted."
Mr. GREY--" Perhaps the question may not hall!
been regularly proposed by the Noble Lord; but;
as the motion made by the Noble Lord is that sort
of motion which cannot be put, the House I true
will not think it improper in me to state my opinion,
as to whether the House should at its rising adjourn
till to-morrow, and not till Monday. When it
comes from such authority as the Right 'Hon.
Gentleman, that he is convinced no communication
can be made, I shnuld be disposed to accede to
the request founded on such an assertion, that
the House should not meet to-morrows: be
when it is nccon:panied with some degree ar.
explanation, some doubt as to the House re-
quiring the information which it is possible his
Majesty may receive, but-which it may not be pro-
per to communicate. I have .my doubts whether
we ought !•0 consider the proposition of adjourning
such ti one as we ouynt to accede to. I wish the
[louse to recoiled the situation in which we are
placed. It is now a week since the Chancellor of
the Excliv,uer made that important communication,
which deprived us of all hope that the points in dis-
cussion, between this country and France, would be
amicably adjusted. Since that, another proposition
has been made to the Hesse: on Monday last the
Chancellor of the Exchequer stated,.that unforeseen
and unexpected circumstunces :lad prevented Lord
Whitworth from leaving -Paris; yet that Matters
were pot in the course of such ;. result, that some-
thing decisive must take place, and that some com-
munication or other would certainly be made in a
very few days. Now, couplinft these declarations
with what passed, I wish the ou.,:e > determine
on the propriety of adjourning till Mohday. I•We

• •

.

`111..,,,

• •
now that the communication which Cvas to lea to
• d
decisive result, was sent by a messenger who went
away on Saturday last, Intelligence has since sr-
need, that he reached Paris early in the present
week. -)lSrow I wish the Right Hon. Gentleman to
state, whither the communication which was to lead
to s decisive result having been made on Tuesday,
it is not possible-the answer of the French Govern-
meat, which is to convey that result, may not ar.
ire to-morrow ? It is impossible to say it may not
be expeded even before the House rises. Is it too
much thetun ask, on the part of the House and the
public, anxious for come declaration as to those
circumstances by which we are placed in so unusual
a situation ; is it too much to ask that we should
sit till to-morrow, when the Chancellor will be ena-
bled to state that decisive result, for which the
House has so long waited? dere let me remark
the difference of our situation now and on Friday
last. We were told no new arrival of a messenger
could take place before the hour at which we should
assemble. In that the Right /lon. Gentleman was
mistaken. The Messenger did arrive in the course
of that very night ; and, what is extraordinary, at
the time w:ten the Chancellor of the Exchequer was
making the declaration, there were several of the
Members in the House who were in possession of the
very intelligence that Messenger brought. Adual
information was given to me of Lord Whitworth's
not having left Paris. Many Gentlemen know the
fads that the ieformation was in possession of several
persons. The Bight Hon. Gentleman says, he con-
gratulates the House that it did not sit on Satairday
last. i. maintain that the attempt to induce the
House to assemble was justifiable. He congratu-
lates the House that it did not sit in a manner par-
taking somewhat or mystery and alarm, inferring
that consequences of the most dreadful nature would
have resulted from it. NVlnit those consequences
were that could have followed the House assembling
on Saturday last, I am at a loss to conjeaure ; but
i.I know very well that if it hid assembled, the
House would have received, through its proper
channel, the information which reached the public
in another way. We were told that no communi-
cation could be made till another day—the differ-
ence in our present situation is this, that it is hardly
possible the next night should elapse without the re-
turn of the messenger. Then are we not to sit
on a day on which a communication may be re-
ceived ? No, says my Right Hon. Friend, because
Lord Whitworth is not arrived. Now, I should
should like to know, when we are told that the an-
swer to our message is to lead to a decisive result,
when we are told that all the papers are inthe pressa
should like to know why it is improper in his Majesty's
Ministers to make a communication to the House,
so prevent the continuance of that anxiety which has
so long prevailed in the public mind. I cannot con-
ceive how the arrival of Lord Whitworth can be at
all necessary-to this communication. The commit-
nication might not be what one would wish. If
the decisive result should terminate in hostilities ; or
if the result should be what the public must ap-
prove; if it should be the accommodation of the
dispute, I have not heard the Right Hon. Gentle-
man state, that in either of these events the fad
should not be communicated. But it is said Satur-
day is an unusual day for Parliament to meet.—
When there is any objet of private convenience to
be answered, this argument is never urged. On these
grounds I am not satisfied with what has been stated
as a ground for the House adjourning, while the
Country is in a situation of so much anxiety. The
Right Hon. Gentleman says he rests the question
on the impossibility of any information arriving,
and on the impropriety of any communication till
I.ord Whitworth returns. I observe he has not
stated when he will return. I sec no probability but
what it may be next Friday before any communi-
cation is made. Therefore, Sir, if Ido not hear
something more satisfaaory in favour of the ad-
journment, I shall certainly take the sense of the
House.
Mr. SPEAKER.—" I think it right, before the
debate proceeds, to observe that I am not prepared
to state, from memory or reading, of such a motion
being offered in such a form ; and it does not ap-
pear to me to be consistent with the forms of the
House." •
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER.—
" I merely rise for the purpose of explanation. The
Hon. Gentleman has stated fairly, that on Monday
last I informed the House this discussion would be
brought to a decisive result on the ensuing
day, or 'Wednesday morning. It is true,
I did say so, and I was justified in expres-
sing that conviaion, but circumstances have
occurred which produced delay.—(lfear ! bear !)
What those circumstances were the }louse will not
expea me to state. I did state that the delay would
be inconsiderable, but it is on the circumstance of
that delay having taken place I should ground the
motion which I should •submit afterwards to the
House, if the present one is rejeaed or withdrawn.
Lord G. L. GOWER.7--I withdraw .the-Motion,
only on account of form.
Mr. H. LASCELLES thought it duc.to his con-
sistency to state his reason for not adopting the
same line of condua on this occasion, which he did
on Friday last. He should not, on the present
question, give any vote at all, and he was deter-
mined on this, from having found himself, on the
former occasion, with a party which had given a
systematic opposition to Government, and which
had prejudged the question.
Mr. FOX said, be was at a loss to know what the
Hon. Gentleman termed a systematic opposition ; if
he looked at the company at this side of the House,
and who had rested on the same side cm that occa-
sion, he would find many Gentlemen who had given
a systematic support to. Government. The Hon.
Gentleman would be as liable to the imputation of
prejudging the measures of Government by voting
with those who had been in the habit 'of giving it a
systematic support, as with those who had given it
what he terms a systematic opposition. But for his
own part he never recolleaed a division in this-House
in which there was less appearance of party; If the
Eon. Gentleman supposed they were inclined to
prejudge the measures of Government, he wished to
know on what side. If on the side of peace, he'
could not imagine that the Gentlemen who voted with
him, however highly they may value it, would adopt
it on dishonours le grounds; and if on the side of
war, if the Hon. Gentleman looked around him,
he would recognize many who were not averse to
that measure, who voted .on that occasion, and to
whom certain papers had given the appellation of
blood-hound-a The Hon. Gentleman had made use
of the'word consistency, but he would find himself

- 4".

111111

at a lost to support his consisteney,fievcr, aisle
he voted for. For his own part he should not be
apprehensive of forfeiting his consistency, as long as
he voted according to his conscience. The Hon.
Gentleman opposte to him (the Chancellor of the
Exchequer) has said, that no communication could
be made until the arrival of Lord Whitworth.--
It was said, that the question would be determined
on Tuesday or Wednesday, and that a commieei-
cation would be made in the course of a few dAys.
Now...when the Honourable Gentleman made th
declaration, it was to be presumed, he did not mean
next week. It has been stated, that according to
the ordinary mode of travelling, if Lord Whitworth
had left Paris even within half an hour after r.:-
ceiving his answer on Wednesday, he could not l•e
here sooner than to night or to-morrow morning.
But it did not strike his mind, that we should ad-
journ to Monday, except some strong assertions wtit.l
made, that there was no probability of a communi-
cation (n to-morrow. As to the question of form,
he thought it could not be entertained, because it
could not he reconciled with common sense. 'the
Hon. Gentleman has said, that the delay arose from
new circiimst.inces, which he does not think proper
to state, but on which he meant to ground his me-
tion of adjournment to Monday. He was against
delay, for he thought it necessary that the House
and the pu' lic should know their fate as soon as
possible. The Hon. Gentleman has said, that even
if he knew the result of the negociation, he would
not think it proper to give any information until the
arrival of Lord Whitworth. Now, in the alterna-
tive of matters having been amicably adjusted, why
not make it known sooner ? And is not this House
the most proper channel of authentic information,
on a subject in which the public mind is so much
interested ? He does not impute blame to the Hon.
Gentleman, though he has certainly been mistaken
three or four times in this business. He entertained
a hope, that the delay of Lord Whitworth would
be productive of favourable consequences. But as
the earliest information was necessary, if the sense
of the House should be taken, he had no hesitation
as to the side on which he should vote.
Lord HAWKESBU RY—" In the vote I mean
to give to-night, Sir, I am akftuated by the same
reasons that influenced my vote upon Friday last.
I am induced to do so, not only on account of its
being unusual for the House to meet on Saturday,
for that is sometimes done even upon private Bills,
where it may be necessary to advance them a step in
their progress, but I believe it never has been done
when it was not likely to lead to any proceeding.
As, in the present case, it is certain that no advan-
tage can result from the adoption of the original
motion, I am clearly of opinion that the House,
consulting its own charader and dignity, ought to
proceed in its usual course. The Hon. Gentleman
( Mr. Fox) did not misunderstand my Right. Hon.
Friend, in stating him to have said, that no commu-
nication from his Majesty could possibly take place
to-morrow. There is a great probability of delay,
though perhaps not of many hours, and my reasons
for saying this, the House will not exped that I
should at this moment disclose ; but the delay I al-
luded to, must unavoidably defer the information so
generally desired. The Hon. Gentleman (Mr. Fox)
has supposed two possible cases, in either of which,
he thinks, and very properly too, that the earliest
notice ought to be given=namely, the rupture of
the negoil.ans, or an amicab e adjustment. In
either case mite tlidek.t may be irregular,
his Majesty's Ministers woul think it their duty to
make a communication to the House, should it be
sitting at the time, and :it all events would find some
channel or other of communicating it to the people of
the country, especially should the event be of an
unsatisfactory nature. The House has been told,
from such authority as it may rely upon, that no
regular communication can possibly take place to-
morrow. I believe it never has been the custom
for his Majesty to send a Message to Parliament till
the aft itself be in such forwardness, as to be in a
state to be communicated, or until the artival of the
Ambassador ; and I have heard no good reason
why the usual course should be deviated from in
this instance. No proceeding of the House could
take place, to-morrow, or be accelerated by meeting
out of its ordinary course, and I cannot give my as-
sent to an extraordinary sitting, merely upon the
presumed chance of an oral communication."
Mr. MARTIN said, lie did not see any possible
mischief that could arise from the House sitting to-
morrow, and he thought it the more desirable that
they should do so, as, if separated, something might
arise to expose them to the anger and indignation of
the country.
Dr. LAWRENCE could perceive nothing Far-
liamentarily irregular in moving, that the House
should sit to-morrow. To adjourn from day to
day was the constant rule and usage of Parliament.
and the motion of adjourning to Monday, was no
more than a supercession of it.
The question that the House at its rising in ad-
journ till Monday, was then put and carried without
any division.
ELECTION COMMITTEES.
The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUrR.
observed, that an Hon. Gentleman (Mr. Fox) lately.
suggested whether it would not he more adviseable
to endeavour to procure one Eleaion Committee
each upon two days in the week, than to attempt to
get two Committees upon one day. After turning
the subjeB in his mind, he was for preferring the
method hitherto adopted, and for the following rea-
son. By an At passed in the last Session of Parlia•
ment, by which if two Committees were appointed
for the same day, if they got one, and could not pr.:- •
cure the other, the House might, notwithstandin:..
proceed to business : but if there was but one al-
pointed, • and • that one could not be formed, t 1;,
House must adjourn. Their time would therefore
be improved by appointing two Committees, be-
cattse, when one was formed, the public bushysa
would not be inconvenienced, as they might stile
goon.
Mr. FOX was satisfied with this explanation, and
said, that his suggestion arose from a wish to accom-
modate the convenience tif the House, as the pub-
lic business must commence at a later hour after
forming two ballots, than if there was only one.
Here the conversation ended, as there was no
motion before the House, and they will of course
proceed on Thursday in the usual manner to ballot
for two Committees.
The ATTORNEY GENERAL brought in the
Bill for indemnifying the persons concerned in exe-
cuting the two Acts of Council relative to thd stor-
page of the exportation of Naval Stores, and the
'permitting of the enrartation of certain aced grain

:. 1 .

to Norway ; which, was read a first time, and or-
dered to he read a second time on Monday.
The Soldiers' Relief Bill went through a Com-
mittee, Mr. Alexander in the Chair, and was or-
dered to be reported on Monday.
HIGHLANDS OF SCOTLAND
Mr. I. H. BROWNE, pursuant to instruetiotu
teceived from the Committee, gave notice that he
would, on Tuesday next, move for leave to bring
in a Bill founded on the second resolution of the Re-
port he had the honour of making to the House,
from the Committee appointed to consider of the
survey of the Highlands of Scotland. The subjea,
be said, was of very great importance considering
the late alarming emigration of the natives from that
part of the kingdom to foieign countries ; and the
obje& of the Bill would be to regulate the shipping,
accommodations, &c. of passengets sailing to fo-
reign parts.
The Irish Courts of Law Bill was read a third
time, and passed, on the motion of Mr. Lee, after
a new clause had been added, and some verbal al-
terations made in it.
The Committees of Supply and Ways and Means
were deferred till Monday, to which day the House
adjourned.

771RAT'R.E.R0rAL, DRURT-LANE.
VHS EVENING will be performed a Comedy called
THE MARRIAGE PROMISE.
Tbe Cita:eters by Mr. C. Kembie, Mr. Dwyer, Mr. Dow-
er% Mr Hollingsworth, Mr. Bannister, Jun. Mr Palmer, Mr.
INPe, Mr. Poste% M►. Purace, Mr. Eram. Mrs Powell,
M Mellon, Mrs. Maddock% Mrs. Spark•, Mrs. Jordan.

To which will bc

I.ODOISKA.
On Toselay nest, 19th time, The Marriagz Promise.

THRATRE-ROr.9L, COVENT-GARDEN.
TIIIS EVENING will be presented a New Comedy cadel
• JOHN BULL;
Or, AN ENGLISIIMAN's FIRE-SIDE.
The principal Charaftens by
Mr. T.owis, Mr. Morrow, Mr. Fawcett, Mr..fohnstone,
lb. 11. Joli Isom, Mr. Blanchard, Mr. F.inerv, Mr. Middy ,
Mrs. Gibbs, Mrs. Davenport, and Mr.. II Johnston.
With a Lyrical Epihrire by Mr. Johnitone.
To which will be adne