The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser.
London, England, 1819-12-03 00:00:00

.
opinion : "el, 4ne objeclL
might to be'directsal so. Alio umociiiks....ll liut - 'Y
i *sir ensviioeuts., Eh 40411111WarporaAtog the I 146d/ult. Bet might,. tit*. iletite care....----
-- - hi.- Ibe *drained so rifeno fitdi4oiiiiialsoA. omijk
.._
Suppose,
- -

A.:lll.tny MUSICAL REGALIO will tike place
).MORROW EVENING, D.eember 4, at SHADE's
INCERT ROOM, SOl4O-SQUARE, for the • lest time
(-vivo% to her Engagement at the Theatre-Roysl, Covent-
' uotice will be given of its re.commencemem ;
ad also of her READINGS and RECITATIONS from
11*.ltims, Shrlomeare, Ossian, Tams), Canoens, Collies, Gray,
And many retebraied Living Writcrs

ADEI.PHI THEATRE, STRAND,
LATE THE SANS PAREIL.
rjr lIIS EVENING, FRIDAY, Dec. 3, and
a TasitsaitotT, Saturday, will be presented au entire
New lintletts. entitled
ODDS AND ENDS;
OR, WHICH is THE MANAGER?
111r.Gat, Mr. Cowell, in which he will introduce" The
Club ;" Jack Jib, Mr. O'Callaghan ((ront the
Enchah Orera.Honse), who will introduce "Stand to your
guns; alid a new Sons, composed by Mr. Horn; Cavil. Mr.
W S. Chatterley. Alias Biddy, Alias Tata; Mrs. Tiger,
Mir. Daly.
With the New Comic Barletta, called
TUC GREEN DRAGON; or, I'VE QUITE FORGOT!
After which, the New Ballet, retitled
EDGAR and EFFIE; or, THP HIGHLAND ROBBER.
To conclude with the Harlem of
FUN and FRIGHT; or, HOW TO GAIN CONSENT.

ROYA I. COBURG THEATRE,
rodrr the Patronage of big Royal Highness
Neuf.? LEOPOLD of SAXE COBURG.
nil-Ims EVENING. FRIDAY. Dee. 3. and
'f 0- SI ORROW, Saturday, the Evening's Entertain.
v.,111. to commeuce with the much-admired Ballet Divertise-
i...ut, tompored by Mons. Le eleseq. called
LOVE IN THE VINTAGE.
Aft(' which will he produced, with every pusvible degree of
rplcndinir, for the MTh lime, an entirely new grand Male-
aniatie Tale of Emeleantmeat, in two WO. called
BEAUTY and THE BEAST; or, THE MAGIC ROSE.
To conclude with, 17th time, the in ing Melo.Draina,
called,
MARY THE MAID OF THE INN!

MR. OWEN'S PLAN.
4 T NUMEROUS MEETING of the
till COMMITTEE appointed to investigate the PLAN
of ROB yin. OWEN, Esq. of New Lanark;
11,s 11,,yel Flightiest. the Duke of KENT, in the Chair.
Upen a review of she proceedings of the Committee, and
it appearing that the Subscriptions hitherto entered at the
seiertl Bankers did not amount to 8,0001, the following
father Mikes. to the Public was unauimously agreed to:—
The Committee having been nimble, from the went of en
adequate Subscription, to carry into effect the experiment
of a single establishment on Mr. Owens Plan, as recom-
mended by the Public Meeting behl at the City of London
Tavi in, on the 2fith July last, are under the necessity of
revigning to the Public, by whom they were fur that purpose
appointel, the trust so reposed in them.
'the Committee cannot on this occasion but express •
feeling of egret, that, after a considerable sacrifice of time,
and much laborious investigation of a most important sub-
ject, their ealeavours should have proved fruitless, and
:in opportunity thus, at the present interesting crisis, been
lost, of Inuigitig a peat question to the test of experience,
when little risk and no injury could have accrued from the
cempletan of the experiment ; and which, should it have
proved ultimately unsuccessful in the attainment of its
',lunary object, could not have failed to have elicited much
prectical good, in an especial ni r, to the persons fur
,muse immediate benefit it was contemplated' as well as to
nil classes of the community, by the diffusion of knowledge,
and the inirovernent ever to be derived from experience.
In their former Address the Committee endeavoured to
stale candidly and explicitly the result of their inquiries,
they were of opinion that the Plan was worthy of an expe-
-1
init tit,snd subsequent evade have contributed to strengthen
that impression. Ft cannot be too often repeated, that the
Pauper System, as now administered, is attended with pro-
greveively increasing burdens of vexation and expense, and
that a change must speedily take place. The only question
is, whether that change shall be effected in a gradual sod
temperate maser, by legislative provisions, or whether the
welfare and prosperity of the kingdom is to be hazarded by
an adherence to the present system.
The Committee, actuated by a sincere and anxious wish
that Parliament may be induced to adopt a course calculated
pit route a gradual sod beneficial change, would still ear-
nestly submit the expediency of introducing sums coact-
meet. with a view to an improved applicstion of the im-
mense sum raised for the relief of the Pour throughout the

kingdom ; either by Government undertaking stick appli- I
tation, ur effecting the saute object by'a cordial co.
operation with parishes, particularly the more popu-
lons WWI, fur a consolidation of their funds in form-
ing large and economical district establishments, com-
bining active and healthy agricultural employment for
the young and able-bodied, useful education for infancy,
and nerilfril relief for the aged and infirm; thus forming
in evert particular a strikiug contrast to the existing cys-
t. except in a few districts, as in and dm Isle of
'slight, where • very slight approximation to these improve-
niruts has sire-lily exhibited in its effects a usarkedsuperio-
rity to thereat of the kingdom. By a grant of an adequate
poi titan of Crown laud, in different districts, the experiment
might be greatly expedited and facilitated ; and, by proper
restrictions, no possibk risk or inconvenience could attend it.
The Duke of Kent having quitted the Chair, the following
Resolution was unanimously agreed to :
The Committee cannot separate without expressing their
grateful sense of the condescending kindness with which his
Royal Highness the Duke of Kent has presided at their
several Meetings, and of the intelligence with which In hes
hero pleased to direct their discussions, evincing en this,
as on every other similar occasion, his 111131311.1 *Sire M.
rerun.' and promote every object of useful sod hammiest
inquiry suggested by an enlightened Public.
Signed by order,
JAMES MILLAR, Bow. See.
Committee Room, 3, Holborn-cowl,
Gray's les, December 1, 1819.

parts, for the greater convenneace er preparing distinct
turns of the indictments end of the iisestrions.
Similar returns were ordered wit► respect to Scotland, on
the 'notion or the Earl of Roseren.

MILITARY TRAINING.
AND SEARCH FOR ARMS BILLS.

The Order of the Day beim; read—
Lord Sinmovern ruse and said. after the expla-
nation he had given on a former Melt, hr should
not now occupy much of their Lordships' time by
re-staling any of the points to which he had pre-
viously directed their atteution. He felt himself,
however, bound to notice that the provisions of the
two Bills now on their Lordships' table, were con-
taisied in the Act of the 64(1 of the King, which had
passed the Legislature when some of the northere
and midland districts were agitated by the devices
for destroying machinery. That Act prevented dril-
ling and trebling, except under the sanction of the
proper Officers of the Crown. and also empowered
Magistrates to search► for arms, but in a manlier
much more rigoreus than was now contemplated.
Let the /lonise refer to that Bill, and compare it
with the present, and they would hid that the
measure now proposed did not exceed the ne-
cessity of the case. He begged leave to add, that
although the evidence already laid upon the
table was, in his mind, sufficient to justify the
enactment of the present Billy, the necessity of such
measures was w itch more fully proved by the ac-
counts winch he had received within the last three
days. The system of military training was purvu•
ed more extru►ively, and arms were provided to a
much greater and more alarming amount, siuce the
document, on the table had been selected. Hiving
submitted these grounds to their Lordships, he
should move, that the Bill for preventing Drilling
and Training he read a second time.
Lord ERSKINE said, that when the Act of the eid
of the King, to which the Noble Lord had a►luded,
had passed the Legislature, the necessity of some
such measure was established on far more conclu-
sive evidence thou was now submitted to their at-
tention. Machitiery was then extensively destroyed,
and every man felt the j ~tice and expediency of
extending legislative protectinu to individual pro-
perty. 'the present Bills, indeed, being local and
temporary--
Lord SibmonTu —" i beg the Noble Lord',
pardon, the Bill egaiest military training is 'wither
local nor temporary. It is meant to be the permit-
uent law of the country."
Lord ERMINE resumed. Such behiet the case,
the objections to that measure became much stronger.
It was, no doubt, necessary to repress every indica-
tion of violence, and no man could be more .anxious
than he was to concur iii any measure having that
object fairly in view; but to his mind the present
Bill was ill calculated to effect that purpose. The
punishment was too severe—and he could, from his
long experience, take upon him to affirm, that a
measure declaring the act of drilling and training a
misdemeanor, and thereby placing in the Court a
power of discretionally apportioning punishment to
the offence, would be much more effectual than
making it a felony, %%lien the punishment was to
severe as was now proposed. Juries were disposed
to hang back in the execution of the law, and per-
mit the Cr'.
Search for Arms Bill, he denounced it as hostile to
the spirit of the Constitution. By its provisions, if
any iudividual informed on oath that another man
had arms in his possession, his house might be en-
tered by violence, at any hour either of the day or
night. This might be the case with regard to any
man in the district to which the law extends, to the
Lord Lieutenant of the county, to Lord Derby
himself, and thus hie comforts and the security of
his home may depend upon the caprice or ivaoleuce
of an individual.
Lord LII.FoRD remarked, that much of the ob-
servations of the Learned Lord referred solely to
the enactments of the Bill, which might be more
satisfactorily discussed in the Committee. The
Learned Lord seemed to speak elightiugly of the
evidence before the House; but although that evi-
dence was, fur an obvious reason, laid before them
anonymously. he could assure the House that he
was acquainted with sortie of the individuals who
gave it, and they were such men as the House
might coutideutly rely on their testimony. He
assented to the general principle of the present mea.
sures, hut he freely confessed that there were some
parts of the enactiuents which to his mind might
be well altered in the Coaau►ittee.
Lord Easo!s c said, that iu the year 1794, when
certain flatworm's of-a similar nature cause before
the House, it was refereed to a Committee, aud on
the Report which they brought 114 indictments
ware founded and presented to. Grand Juries. No
proceedings were, however. taken without , ex-
asiiiising the wits►e.ses persooally. But uot womb
to the pretest Bills, *alum by themselves, did be-ob.

Bill, he would find that the forcible entry was not
permitted, unleas upon the oath of a credible per-
son that arms were concealed within the house,
" for purposes dangerous to the public peace."
Alluding then to the necessity of counteract-
ing the designs of the disaffected, he observed,
that he was present in the House of Com-
mons when that great man, now no more (Mr.
Burke), forcibly represented the nature of projects
not very dissimilar from those against which the
present measures were framed, by flinging down a
dagger. He thought lie knew where that dagger
now was, but no person could think that this
weapon was kept fur dangerous purports. No ;it
was kept vs a memorial of that great and immortal
man's exertions in support of measures which mainly
coutributed to the preservation of this country.—
He contended that the present Bill, fur depriving
the disaffected of anus, did nut coutravane the prin.
.eiple of the Bill of Rights. which only gave them
to be used for deferrer. There was no principle so
impenetrable as the qualification required by the
Bill of, Rights, and on that he would stand to
ju►tify the present Bill. He argued that drilling
mid training with a seditious interit was an overt act
of high treason—/Cries if Hear. hear, from the
Oppagition becliftfi)—and if large bodies of men
assembled to learn military manoeuvres, for the
purpose of displaying their force, and of attaining
their object of altering the labs and constitution of
the realm,"bv striking terror, that too was high
treason.—/Hear.)—He again declared, that the
proposed measure■ were not incoosistent with the
preamble of the Bill of Rights, •nd observed,
that if any alterations were necessary they might be
made in the Committee. •
Lord REDE9D• LC remarked, that the facts which
had been stated in the Reports of the Committees
in the year 1794, were subsequently credited by
the Juries to whom they were submitted. There
wits only one point on which any difficulty arose.
The Reports had stated that a treasonable cones-
pondet.ce existed, without specifying that it was not
by writing but by messages. This caused some
apparent difference, but it was clearly proved that
a correspondence was carried ou by mama of per-
sonal communication.
Lord HOLLAND. in rising to make a few remarks
upon the two Bills now ou the table, and the other
tremendous measures with which they were threat-
ened, would not trouble their Lordships with► uuy
comments upon what had been done in 1794, upon
the manner in which the Noble and Learned Lord
on the Woolsack had conducted himself in the
office of Attorney-General, nor upon the diversity
or agreement between the facts contained in the Re-
ports of Parliament, and thrice which were subse-
quently credited by Juries. The Noble and
Learned Lord (Redesdate), however, seems to
think, that, because facts alleged at one time were
not denied, therefore all objections made to state-
ments advanced on other rx•tasions must be un-
founded. But. was the statement respecting Mr.
Horsefali supported ?—were all the other allega-
tions ever since adopted by Committees well esta-
blished ? But he would not follow the precious
mode of reasoning adopted by the Noble and
Learned Lord. nor would he say that because the
Reports in 1812 were filet, therefore all other evi-
dence must be false likewise. Such a circumstance,
however, ought to operate ma reason fur inducing
them to receive such evidence in future with can-
tiou.—( Hear, hear. )—Were he to refer to the ar-
guments of Mr. Burke. he would not bring forward
the dagger scene as a specimen of his talents, nor
would he have the dagger written in his heart, in-
stead of those flue maxims which were occasionally to
be form(' in his writings, one of which, referring to the
discontents of the people, was, '• at least if the pen.
plc are widely discontented, one of two things must
be true—either we must have a had people, or a
bad Administration."—( Cries of hear, hear.)—
But he should apologise to the House fur dwelling
upon points not immediately connected with the
subject of present debate. The mode of proceed-
ing adopted by the Noble Viscount opposite, al-
though probably most convenient for the House, by
arguing at the same moment two Bills, both being
is pan atateria, was to him a considerable enibar-
rassinent. lie d:d not mean to object to the prin-
ciple of ,the Bill fur preventing military dril-
bog and training, nor did he say that the gene-
ral principle of the second Bill, relating to the
search of arms, was wholly objectiosiable. He
was not lawyer enough to tell with accuracy
what constituted an overt act of high treason, list
he had enough of common sense to know, that if a
number of men, with a seditious purpose, assem-
bled to learn military drilling and training, they
usual be guilty of a great crime; and he was ready
to admit, that if there meted no law to pretreat
such a practice, a law to that effect ought to be

did not bringing
once condemns a man drilling others to trimmed,-
tiois, and the men chilled to three years imprison.
meet. This point could be most satisfactorily ar-
ranged in • Committee ; but he could not perceive
the cause of this diversity, as it was certain that if
the intent constituted the crime, the one party was
no Iras guilty than the other. When his Noble
and Learned Friend on the Woolsack undertook to
defend the principle of these Bills, he was sin!, that
he did not follow the example set to him by the
Noble Viscount opposite, who confessed that the
Bills were not consistent with the spirit of the
British Constitution. He never had heard a
severer attack made upon the Constitution
than that which had been pronounced by the
Noble and Learned Lord on the Woolsack,
when he declared thst the present measures were
not set infringement upon the Bill of Rights; never
had a severer satire been spoken against the system
of government in or out of the House, by radical
or any other person. He could never admit that
the grout men of the Revolution, by whom, both in
law and in politics, so much had been achieved,
could have thought of limiting the right of haring
arms ; or that in using the word. " suitable to
their condition," they were training one law for the
rich and another for the poor. A standing army
was at once a part of our strength and also a part
of our weakness, and it was to render this burden
unnecessary, or to obviate its dangers, that indi-
viduals were intrusted with arms; but it was add-
ing insult to injury, to tell the people that they
omit vow be disarmed, in conformity with the priu.
ciple contained iu the preamble of the Bill of
Rights. He was ready to confess that the Bill for
diparming the people was framed with as much
tenderness as possible, mid in that respect far ex-
ceeded the Bill of the Aid of the King—and, be.
Mg a local and temporary measure, was probably
as free from exceptions as any that could be
devised for the specific porpose,—(Bear, hear,
hear, from the Ministerial Benches.)—But lie
principally objected to the Bill as a part of
one great system which had • tendency to create
'distrust and diaffection, where it did not exist, and
to exaggenite them where they were already in
action. He would not say that any design had
been formed to bring the country into its present
state, or that difficulties were created or buffered to
grow up for the purpose of increasing the power of
the Ministers; hut he must say, that if there were
at the head of the Government an individual who
sought to subvert the liberties of the country, no
better method could be adopted for that end titan
nil occasional remissness in exerting the authority,
or the State, and • frequent demsod upon Par-
liament, that it would undertake the odious task
of putting down the popular spirit which hod
been encouraged or permitted by the negligence
of the proper authority.—(Hear, hear, hear.)—
Such • mode of proceeding must at last bring the
country to that state, that many honest and worthy
persons would entertain the belief that nothing
could secure the tranquillity of the country but the-
bayonet. A system of violence end coercion could
have no other effect than to produce a coiresposid.
ing determination on the part of the people to op-
pose it with vigour. He retnerked. that much of
the spirit that unhappily prevailed in Lancashire..
and the disturbed districts, might be traced to the
system of Orange Lodges recently established is:
them. If the witnesses, whose testimouies were a
the table. were personally brought before them. he
should like to learn how far those witnesses were
connected with that system, and how far some even-
of the Magistrates of those districts were engaged
in it. The fact of passing there Bills against
any portion of the people was humiliating, for they
implied that this portion of the people...were arming •
and acting against the Government. No project
could he more difficult than that of disarming them
by violence—if they felled in their purpose, ma
immediate danger stared them in the face; and.
even if they succeeded, they left a wound milt..
Zing in the minds of the people which it would be
difficult to heal.--(Neer, hear.)—He should say
1, content" to the first Bill for preventing drilling
and training, if bottle few alterations were Reader
but many changes and additions would be maw
miry before he could assent to the Bill for the Mee*
of aress. To either of th.m, however, mime'
separately, his objections were light in campfire*
with those lie felt against them as forming a pert of
a system which lw feared was pregnant with the
worst and must dangerous consequences.—(estr.)
The LORD CHANCELLOR ruse to repel the ob-
servations which. had beat made tipsiest bins ; he
said, iu the situation he was, it would not beanie
hies to f.rget the peatection due to the Comnisation,
sad Ire hoped he never had (to the prejudice of
any man) sacrificed one principle which might be

- Reform in Parliament.
entertained a distinct *sr-
.
nion. The people said. if they had Parliamentary
Reform. they must also have outwit! Parliaments
and universal suffrage. He concluded by stating.
that, in his opinion, the measures that were proposed
were not too severe, but highly necessary to be
adopted.
Lord HOLLAND, in explanation, said he had cot
stated that the Noble Lord on the Woolsack bad
misquoted the Bill of Rights. It had been stated
that a reform had been offered as a mruns of conci-
liation : he had never stated to that House any thing
about • reform in Parliament. Though the Noble
Marquis entertained a distinct opinion on that
point, yet he (Lord Holland) never bad given any
distinct opinion on it.
The Marquis of BUCILINGNAK said, that he did
not state that the Noble Lord (Holland) had offered
reform as the conciliation, but that that was the
conciliation offered.
The Duke of SCISEX said, he wi.hed, when
Noble Lords made quotations, that they would
take care their quotations were correct. Upon the
Bills that evening before the House, he took the
opportouity of stating Ind arquieacence in their,
and he felt that they were intended for the interests
of the country. It was a must inipor:lnit point not
to inn sate the public mind. With regard to the
Bill of Rights, no man could consider that moist
without feeling deeply interested in it. With great
respect to the Noble Lord on the Wool.ack, he
would state, that when that Noble Lord lied said,
that he saw in the documents before them several
nos which he wa 'decidedly of opinion amounted to
overt arts of treason he wasauxiou. that his Lord: hits
had been Attorney General. those acts had bent
put down,it would have kept the people from many
of the evils which now existed. The Noble Marquis
had been talking about • Reform, mid though lie
was no Radical, yet he would tell him that he had
his opinion of Reform, and whenever that ques-
tion should be brought forward, he should feel tot
hesitation in expressing his sentiments oil that sub.
jest. He hoped he should be allowed to state,
that, while he differed from the Noble Lord on the
other aide, he differed because he thought it •iin-
portont that they should look to causes. Wit!i
great respect he would say, that those physicians
who did nut examine the disorder can folly, hut
took the symptoms fur the disease itself, might kill
the patient, but never cure the disease. He thought
it right that his opinion on this question shoulis lint
be doubted, ur with regard to his affection fur los
country and the interests of it.
Lord. DARNLZY entertaitied no objection to the
Training Bill. but as to entering hou.es fut the
purpose of searching for arms, sione difficulties,
perhaps, might arise. Previous to the 16ili
August, there was a very elangerou, spirit among
sevend iudividuals in the snatitifactuirsig distrint.„
rod itinerant demagogues were going about the
country to those places where distress moat prevailed,
and who were more likely to be deluded on account
of their distress. After that day his Maje.iy's al,.
misters instituted an inquiry, and advised the
Prince Regent to thank the Magistrates, and to re+
turn his sumer to a Petition preseilted by the
Corporation of London. *He would not ewer into
a detail of the t • *ions of that day. but the
events of it were most thereteous. Wu. women. *Ltd
children were crushed and trampled u puts, and may
received sabre wounds. Vt' lien Pallid:heist met, the
public supposed that an inquiry would be iustituted,
but an application of his Noble Friends to that ef-
fect, was objected to. They should satisfy the people
that they were prepared to do their duty to them.
and that might put down any improper proc,editigs.
Their obedience to the laws must depend on the
attention which the House paid to the interest. and
liberties of the people. It had been said. that the
conciliation offered was Parliamentary Reform...-.
lie believed such • measure of colicilsatiOsi had
never been proposed or thought of. Ile must, tom.
ever, say, that he would rather live under the go-
vernment of the Noble Secretary of State than of
Mr. Hunt and Dr. Watson.—(4 laugh.)
Lord DARLINGTON said, he thought it his duty
to trouble their Lordships with a few observations
on the present question ; as a Menthe% of the.
Legislature. and having held a situatsoo its the
county of Durham, ever since the year 179 i. he
felt himself called upon to express his sentiments
oa the present occasion. He hud taken coosider.
able pains to learn, and be thought himself smite-
tent to form tut opiniou, of the state of the people
in the nurtheru counties. At Newcastle, ruertitigo
had been assembled in very greet numbers, in.cou-
seqsance of differtoces between the colliers and astir
mew Those meeting; those' antserusa, Red via.
rated very quietly, bet he ameeived their miaow of
assembling was mach as to retinae the attention
sri
his Majesty's Geretalteld. was art quite sure

. ‘,..V.Wm.r... , „ ,„ • .
' f .
, • ~ , .
di
b.
~ ~,„,,,,,..-/
677 f / „..._,....__. . ..... ....
.• • • 0 •
:".4.6."'''''''lsVes....-.. . •
•' • -witlimilh
•
. A ei, •. , 1
...-, •
....: WI I
'-... -
.
..
Teitt-P-Gtt - .
li - ' • -
•
,„.•••••..
~.....- • • •
' A
f. . • •
. . .
• ''••• .- -1...
••;, ls.r‘ - ti. 4 it 4...,
.
i.. . .....}.. r. ,- L.:fa -I,'
• . .
I
—,•_----L----------:—.42"
.
-
. .
NUMBER 5301. LONDON, FRIDAY, DECEMBER. 3, 1819.
. ,
1bit.01,11.1 innpttoliddelcioarre7tratts:ni
THE. 4 TN 6.ROYA L. DRURY-LANK. I •.lAIPERIAL PARLIANEN T. ject, as to the whole system now proptleedi front the evade.--rllemr, ilear.J-But to the prearn,lcelteies
nuf.
nrilllS EVENING, FRIDAY, December 3, I •' oppoeite side. When be considered,, time ales- the Bill two propo•ed he had a fired obi
.
his Majesty'. Servant. will perform the Play of HOUSE OF LORDS, THURSDAY, DeCESHIER 2. sures in the aggregate. and Him mappadry effect, 1 fur it n..ertell facts of which lie did not thin lt there awes ender the coueiderutihn hi
_IL
THE IRON CHEST. , and how little like Englaud they wouittbave Eng. eras Autficient evidence. One Noble Lord (Lit- never his inteeition to deprive ii
I
Edward Mortimer Mr. Kean; Wilford, Mr. Barnard ; Mr. Masan. from the East India Hnum, resented ow se- . Iniul-f hear, kror•J-he was siarne '',... the view, i ford) indeed thought the evidence on tlie table con- .
kur*Tai'lle.Arlsearicir:ll7s°nife. cßliticycl'i
/•,,11.,,Erd'1,,,,,,, Mr. Powell; Adam Winterion, Mr. Moniten; i enrol from films Directois of the Compsay, relative to the and apprehended that the thstrust-a by them ' dowse; but on this point he was compelled to
llts held. gr. Holland; Samson, Mr. Harley ;
lArmstrung, •, e ith 1 i
till rlattr. grained since tli9ast. Reterus.-Laid in the public mind would be eaten& th the most differ from him. The allegations continued in the Meted+ that the eiliject of one i
lit,. I. co,,ke. Helen, Mrs. Glover; Blanch, 8 rs. Urger; ; en .e n,,
1 The Part or CARMAIRVOn presented three Petition* from . 614121.111"""tluvric". ter• entitle of the Bill funned one of the mints in diearm the people. end to leave
Balboa, Miss Posey; Judith, Mrs. Eeerints.• ~
After which the Farce of I llfrsconshe awl other places in ' Devuarbire, relating (we The LORD CH•NCELLOR tleatbßoltt in comic- I the greet bill of indictment refereed loy the means of self-defence ;he re
LOCK AN I) K EY. believe) to the ereeows of a prisms is pest county. garners of what had falleu from his Nl&sud Leon- Ministers of the Crown against the people of such object, but twt it „,,Lv lot
Afire n few words from [And Rost t;' whirl were Wis. venting the people froin tiring
T-l m or the °vela of The Siege of neirruite,rd Frithid that had the honour oriMg the office England, and. Parliament were bound to look A*
. r
tie Moloby, the Tragedy of Wag Richard the Third. . tin_rt below tare bar,the_ Petitioint were laided On( 11W table.Ae .
IL of Attorner:rzerplal in 1794, and proceeded I the evidence supporting it with much jealou•y. the Bill of Rights, they were cut
------------'—_--. 1 Thu Margot. of LAnsaiewa mow or an L . . __. ~. _,
i 'herring the timelier of teforinatiesio filed Re effietts, hy the against the en who \tens )31,13 tried fur I more particularly as experience lied *hewn to them their own purposes). but for if
1.11 E. 4 TRE.RO YA L, COVENGA RDEN.
ThlIS EVENING. FRIDAY . December 3, i Aitoneey.Geeseral, and of indictments preferred acaiast its•': high treason. net upon the allegations contaiised in , that fact, had often been lightly adopted, which
dividuals, fur blasphemous and seditious libels, daring the Co.istitution and the coneeiry.-
the Reports of the Committees of tarlientent, but I were subsequently colifeeted. He believed that he of Rights entitled every mate t
will he acted the Comedy of
THE RIVALS. years 1818 and 1819, specifying the dates of each senate- upon the evidence diminctiv v ' %mil to him iii I had secure
lively, mid also the nocaber abandoned by, the prosecutor; tely collected from the Noble Lord at to his conditieni as a pesceab'
Ins professioual cepacity. Hi. N lo Friend re- I the bead nf the Trea•ury the object of this Bill. It moment they were used sestina
Sir Anthony Absolute, Mr.W. Ferree ; Sir Lucius 071.4. 1
, the number fanlight to trial, and the verdict, given therein. was denied that by the existing law the act of the country. it herniae Path'
marked that the present measures *bold alter Eng-
Lord H oLLA D sporested that the Returus should refer
Tyr, Mr. Connor ; Issnlkland, Mr. Abbott ; Copt. Absioute, i
,b,. C. ti,,,hble; Acres, Mr. Lister ; David. Mr.
. Emery. I **far bark as to Hie year 1810. land from what it was; but he *Mild Ink, what 1 drilling and training was criminal; but, said the meavum as should prevent tl
Irc Malaprop, OM Datvnpurt; Lydia Languish, Maw I
The Earl of LIVERPOOL expressed a. wish that the :no- would England be, if th measures were rot Noble Earl (Liverpool). in explaining the wee,- vied into effect, and to tithe
r•tilIP1); hill•, Mrs. Davison. tion of the Mehl. Marquis should stand as it was SOW pro. adopted I If, however, his noble Frientrettleriain. 1 sny of the measure, the criminal intention most use them for the purpose of oil
Tu which will be added, the Musical Romance of . piped, as the Reforms given in consequence of it would he • •
ea such ao opinion respecting the,. 41ie ebjections ,be proved, and it was • point of considerable nation. They were put betwi
RICHARD C(EUR DE LION. seffieiest for the mgpelmieg of the ers NOW hefeve .
r0..,,,,,„,,,,...1..... nuakieg fdaccrygort with Ras. 1 0,,,, 10A "i3l , 144. • • ,i).„.... ...' Neteight to be' directed to •• ' ..„1 nut tv, ; difficolty to bring this directly isgairtat any in- and they mist either take si
.iii!. awl Wival. lion Re singioi move rton • netni4ll/411,1111kir lettnLifiteutn..• Me . gag Os ii clieideol. But -might..tbot.,sotne circumstances repeated to them to obviate
-------------M Lived HOLLAND acquitaced in this anotteement. . effect. of the Search for Arms Bill seemed to have Ibe admitted as Isigiee fireii:Willthellnr sli 0.. art.
.winsis.lo e,fenrpromiae., file I,
LIISS MACAI:LEY has the honour o . an-
TA fhteer
Marquisafew wourfd suinNeospowuversalg idiosividszosshietbzottisobnieze
two been made without his usual accuracy; for if his 1 mined intent? Soppose, for instance, meeting •VeiViiimmirded ; ifttt-admileada
Yr nonliving to her Friends and the Public, that her Neither more 'nor less than d R
- _
12:1I 1... .......1.1 A... 1 th.• .6f foroil.l. entry was not I did not facilitate the bringing of evidence. It at Upon that question he entert