The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser.
London, England, 1806-03-04 00:00:00

'

ti
attend the itial first the subjetits of tlie
reafro.l d a right to the attendance et the Judge;
in the Lnurts of Justice ; the question did not at all
turn upon whether the presen; Jiotice was fit to ,
he trusted in both situations? but upon that degree of
scrupulous delicacy, which It was essential to pro•
serve, in considerations of the kind t With respeO to
the precedents of Chief Justices Lee and Eyre, their
attendance was upois Privy Councils getierally sum-
moned, and not as habitual Members of the Cabinet.
I le :on:ended fat the expediency of preserving the
channels through which the justice of she country
we; admiaisteted, not only as pure in' themselves as
posOhle, fait fire from evety attendant circumstance
which may even give rise to a suspicion.
The Earl of CARLISLE considered the present
• di•cussion as 1.•,3 proceeding from an alarm really
exiiting in the puhlic mind, than from An endeavour
te lower, in the public opinion, an Administration
remarkable for its coosbinatien of talents, know-
ledge, and integrity ; which the Sovereign, in his
parental care of the intereos and security of his
subjects, had called to official duty. He had never
bested of arcyolyeasiness exinine before that night ;
but, even so, the, proposition of the Noble Earl d d
not go to cure the evil ; it rich...? went tv prevent A
Judge from tiring called upon for his advice, in the
' quality of Privy Counsellor ; there were various in-
' stances and caws in point, where such persons
weir calied upon, and admitted as confidential
advisers of the Crown; and even to a late period of
. Site present reign ; and no sort of prailical incon-
evidence or evil ever appeared to result from it.
.:he poprositidn. if adopted. would go to the
e!..ew,io•l of every. Judge, not only from the Ca-
binet, bat from giving any advice whatsoever to the
. Groats. He conceived it, upon the whole, to he as
ill-timed a-motion as ever he heard of, and even its
adoption cool!, not answer its professed purpnse.
Lord 130RINGLION said, that his principal
objeaton to tie appointment complained of was,
that the Noble Lotd stood in the double capacity
of, Chief Justice of the King's Bench, and one of
His Majsety's Ministers of State ; offices which, in
his opinion. were lette incompatible with each
oasts. In the first capacity, the Noble Lord was
not removable at the discretion of the Crown ; but
in the second situation he was removable at plea-
sure. To :thew the inexpediency of this, he would
suppose, that for his conduct in the advice he gave
to his Sovereign, as a Cabinet Minister, he might
be impeached by the House of Commons, and he
would leave it to their Lordships to judge of the
propriety of having a person in such a situa-
tion, that he might come from administering the
laws and justice of the country in his Court,
to take his trial in WestrninFser Nall for high
He mentioned the

crones ant rinsueme.........— ___
circumstance of a . Noble Lord, who, in a ei-
i suilar situation. expressed his regret that he had
ever accepted of the double office, in conseqoence of
,
i the unpopularity with which it was attended. No.
k . suspicion should attach itself to the administration.
f• s ice. It may so happen. for instance that a
11-- • 41°
• .6..1a decide a publication to be Ififillous ;
ika so, how could the seess..d riovti ei.sia3 to
find aiol impartial jucoce hero a judge who
h. 4 a ready, prejudged his case 4, a merober of the
eakin t ? He did reit wish to embartas tios or any i
Administration,by any idle or unnecessary motions ; I
but, when he consideredahe AdM:iliftratioll of justice I
• in this country was such as to excite tha admiration
• and envy of sutiounJlng nations, it was, in his
hind, tr:CASSAI y that it should be kept pure and-Iree
irons all suspicion.
Lord SIDMOUTH aJmitted, that the cilesti'm
flow agitated was of very great importance, and
that not:-ing was more essential than that the
admiristiation of civil aid criminal justice should
remain pure and unsuspected. He was sur-
prised a. the observation made by a Noble and ,
.learned friend of . his (Lord Eldon), that were he
Lord Chief Justice of the King's Bench. and ap-
pruoted to a seat in the Cabinet, though he might
have accepted of it, he slould have:ll4ov.! it as
soon as be tound that the ettbhc spin ielb wit against
it, because he wished to keep unsullied the purity of
British jurisdiaion. Did- the Noble Led refleft
that the tendency of such al *nion was, to call in
IN
question the legitimate prero eof the Crown.
and be rochalive.of gienibpubhc alsimay, in the
present crisis, by keeping Sin of the public service a
man of such talons, imegrite, and principle', AS
the present Chief Justice of England? Such a
vndency he thought very inconsistent with
the professions of friendship made towards the
Noble Lord in question. It was said, but as
''-e should thew, fallaciously, that Lord Chief Jos-
- o "s!ansfield was the only solitary instance of a
o .e being known in the same double capacity ;
Se.•, in making that assertion, Noble Lords seemed
~(1 oirget that L• rd Hardwicke, one of the greatest
i,rid best constitutional lawyers this country ever
knee. held for six months the united offices of Led
Chancellor, Lord Chief Justice ot the King's Bench,
and a Cabinet Minister. In addition to this. he
would remind the House, that by the A& of the
4th and Sth of Queen Anne. it was provided, that
in case of a suspension of the InnEtions of the Cowen,
a Regency should be appointed to exercise the Royal
prerogatives ; and amongst the Lords so appointed,
were the Lord Chancellor, the Lord Privy Peal,
and Lord Holt, then Chief Justice of the Court of
King's Bench, who were. in case of the demise of
the Queen, to continue in office till the arrival of
Grotge i. at that time Eleaor of Hanover. That
Bill did not pass without vehement discussion ; but
in all the debates, As tar as he could have acce's to
them. no obieilinn was made to Lord thief Justice
Holt, nor afterwards to his successor, Lord Chief
Justice parker. to faa, the Lori Chief Justice was
always in the secrets of the Government, from his
being a Privy Ccnia•ellor ; and if they looken to the
alifiing oaths, they would find that they were the
tame for a Privy Counsellor and a-Member of the
Cabinet ; which was tie more than a idea com-
mittee of the Privy Council. All the arguments,
therefore, whish applied to the Noble Lord's being
a Cabinet Minister, would be equally st ong against
his being. as he was,. is tVe. a Pfil7 Counsellor,
for all the offioces ..of which the Privy Council
had cognzance, tutvt, by their orders, be brought
before the Lord t hid Justice, who was one of
that Council, in his judicial capacity. These of-
fences stay consist of calumnies against the Govern-
ment or the Privy Council ; hut what appeared to
hist to he decisive. was, that by the same argil-

mente,the leordChief Justice, should never be a mem-
ber of that House i for ,libel against the House,
might be .4iteaed by him, as a Lord of Parliament;
and yet would come before him stain in his ca-
pacity of Lord Clsief Justice of. the Coen of King's
Bench. Whatever anxiety might be onegted'eto
have'pMvailsince ed usuponbsided ; this subjandea amongst thcopne efideople,
d long confident
that it wars a subjea of gratulation amongst them,
to have a Nobleman in the councils of the go-
vernment, who could not ever go into Isis court,
or bear to be addressed by the learned and ho-
nourable gentlemen who pre-diked there, in lan-
gnage of respeet, if he were not conscious of his
own purity and integrity. From the chats ter
of the present administration, the people must
he satisfied, that the Sovereign was well-advised
in the choice of th se whom he admitted into
his Cabinet. The Noble Lord in question may
have, and miter. have, many political, but he
b-sieved few. if any, personal adversaries. His
ju.lic:al conJuft could never be suspoeled of
twine warped by any political conneetinns, nor did
he ever hear that any such stinpicions were ever ens
tertained of Lord Hardwicke. Lott' Talbot, or Of
of those other eminent charaelers who stood in CIA
sh.uie capacity. His office was not held arthe
trilln of the Crown ; his judicial proceed:ngs wire
elwites.publie ; and he urost decide riches by the
ler scripts. or the common law of the land. Ai a
Privy Counsellor. I,e must have an antecede know-
ledge of any libels that may apogee against dee Go-
vernment ; but to say chi: chsenalifted bird knits
sitting in judgment on them, would equally &per
to all the Judges on the circuits, who were always
previously apprized of the nature of tlfe offences,
and the evidence th tt should be produced, by'tlie.
depositions taken before the several Magietrates.-1-1
He could not' consider this in any other light titan
as a personal question ; and ileum these iroeeds he
should give his neeetive to the Motion.
Lord MU LG R AVE observed, that it would ill
become him to objeft to the appointment in qfieS-
tion, tiom any personal considerations ; but he saw
no fair ground of opposition to the Motion, which
did not call in question the cheraeler et an/ Mete. It
was the province of a wise Government, to counsel
His Majesty to exercise his prerogatives far whole-
some purposes ; and the simple question now was,
whether it wet e wise to advise His Ntijesty to the a: -
pointment of the Lord Chief Justice of the King's
Bench, to a seat in the Cabinet ? To say that similar
objections may as well be taken to the Constitution
ot that House, becanse the same person was a Peer
and a Judge. was doing no mote than putting ex-
urense cases ; and the same may truly he said ot
moist of the arguments on the other side. There
was a great difference between the right of gibing
eadvice, and being selected for peculiar confidence to
for a men may very well be chiseeti for tien exercise
-Or participation of power-in time of a Iteeency or
Minority, who might not he a fit co:Advised •,td-
!viser of die reigni!‘g Monarch. It se ,s in error to
&suppose, that the name of entente Mini nerittielied
oothing, peculiar, as every one most bele:me thet there
was Vowniven is.r.rteritfiderStOild in this country, of in
Etereme, than the distinetion between a NUMMI' of.
the. Cabinet, or Minister of state, and a Peril Ctiun-
seller. bird Mansfield was a sin ruler man, end
\
perhaps scarcely ever equalled, in his situation, ftir
a comprehensive knowledge. and the most brilliant .
talent.; but many of their lendthips were std
enough to ternember, that his4sittlation in the Cabi-
net rendered him extremely unpopular. beceuee the
people thought they had aotglet to consider him as
a politicel Judge. if the present Government, as
had beets so often represented. combined all the
splendid talents of the coantry, they had the less
i onasion for a person so objeetionable. 'f he Noble
Lord a question, had. undoentedly, greet merit
in his profession, and of great pr.:dice in the Coatis,
but he was only newly known AS a Statesman ; he
was taken from the Bar to be maee Attorney-Ge-
neral, and was s ion afterwards moistened to the
Chief Justiceship of the King's Bench, without
having had any room for the display of his political
abilities. He said, that however the President Mon-
testeieu might have been admired here and on the
Continent, for his eulogium on the &ibis Consti
tution in his n Spirit of Leone" he must nlsn be ad-
mitted, even in that House, as competent authority;
sad he thought with the Noble Lord who made the
motion, that the testimony of such it man as Mr. Jus-
tice Blackstone ought not to be nit:sleeted. It may
be said, the in cases where the Cabinet deliberated
on the matter of a libel, the Lord Chief Justice need
not attend it; but, in order to assure the public of
this, it would not only be necessary that the names
of all the attending Cabinet Ministeis should be pub-
lished, but also the eubjetts which Cory had in debate.
which would be inconsistent with the now, enjoin-
ed them. In euepnrt of his observations, he sup-
posed a case in which the Cabinet should ditto a
prosecution against a libel on Bonaparte, an instance
of which had- happened before, in what a situation
would the Lord Chief Justice be now plac
eed ?
The sentence to be passed in case of iction was at his discretion. If it were lenient, Bo-
naparte. or any other foreign Prince, might say,
that celismnies against him were encouraged ; and
should it be severe, tie subject might allege, that
he was made a sacrifice so the wish of the cabinet
to conciliate the Prince Another objection was, that
the Chief Justice could not be dismissed, but in
consequence of a joint address of both Houses of
Parliament ; and should they address his Majesty to
remove him, as a confidential and Cabinet Minister.
be might induce the Sovereign not to comply with it.
lepna the whole, he heped that the present Go-
vernment would either remove him themselves, for
the purpose of inviting the public with more cone
fidence in them. or that the Noble Lord himself
would agree to resign his situation.
Lord C,Ii'.I'SFORT said, that all the argu-
ments in favour of the motion were only founded
on suspicion, for the Noble Lord (Eldon) who
spoke early in the debate, acknowledged that the
appointment was not illegal ; and the Noble Mover
confined himself merely to the inexpediency. It
should be reel-die:lei, that what was called the
Cabinet, never exemined witnesses, nor ordered
any prosecutions, for thet was the province of the
Privy Council ; an 1 that His Majesty was author-
ised by the Constitution to demand legal advice in
eves y measure, from the best and highest legal au-
thority. the opinion of Mr. Justice Blackstone
only sent to state, chit it would be dangerous for a

Nli ni ins ttehrat
of
State;u it
Idiaabgi terettnwl'iets a not
•not the opinion 'of the Lord Chiif Justice Us the
situation but
a If Member
the K of
fthe
had
Cabinet, he might have it privately, whenever he
thought proper to all upon him as a Privy Coun-
sellor. The same arguments that applied,against
this, would be equally applicable to that House call-
ing for the opinion of the Judges, and he expressed
his determination to oppose the motion, were it only
on theground of its interference with the exercise of
the Royal Prerogative.
Lord AUCKLAND said, he would not enter,
into any discussion of the general question, but
touch upon a few points, to shew that this appoint-
ment was not unprecedented ; for which purpose he
stated, that, in 1&79, when Charles 11. dismissed
his Ministers, by the advice of Sir Wm. TeMple„
he assured the Parliament that he would, in future,
be directed by the advice of his Cabinet Council, of
which the Lord Chief Justice was a member r; %het
in 1757, Lord Hardwicke exercised, for a time, chi
joint ' offices of Lord Chancellor, Lord Chief Jos.
I tice, and a Member of the Cabinet ; that in the
years.l7BB.9, Lord Chief Justice Kenyon was fre-
(silently called in to give his advice in the Cabinet; •
that •Lord Mansfield, beside Lord Chief .kultice,
was, for seven years, not only a Member of the
Cabinet, but the m •st efficient Minister of the -Esc-
9itive Government ; that Sir Edward Moritague
held both situations at the same time ; that in the
year 1705. the Judges of the land were dirsaed to
draw up a bill of regency, which. was brougho in
by lond Holt, Chief Justice of the Court of King's
Bench. and, that on a reference to history, he founsis
that ever since the reign of Henry VIII. the Lords ,
Chief Justice almost uniformly participated in the
Winn' of the Foecutive Government. If the
• Constitution preclnded them from that participation,
the Judges could not be made Peers of Parliament,,
I and the country would have been, deprived of the
IleOslative advantages derived from their assistancryi
i Upon the whole, he maintained, that their coolsthe
no disquiet is the country upon this subjea, as liei
inhered no man could suspeet that the present Ca-I
bind was not composed of persons firmly attachodi
to. and perfeßly resolved to defend, the Consti.4
tution.
Lord ELDON offered a few words in explana-
i
191 d 11 AW KESBURY agreed with the oppoeel
of Cie motion, that the question was one of y r
great importance. There was no Peer present wins
could more hi,4lllv esteem, than he did, the charoaer
of the Noble Lord, whose appointment was tine sobi
jca of debate. There were other Members hill' ini '
the present Administration, for whom lie entertain.%
ad a very sincere respell, and i'n'ert was not one tot
whom he could have less objeSlion than the N Iblel
Lord in question, as he was convinced that, in many`
essential points. that Noble Lord's sentiments coo
responded with his own. But. however he migb '
approve a his being a Cabinet Minister, and con
denial adviser of the Crown, as Lord Ellen
roogh ;be had every objeaftion to him, in thtt cape
city, as Lord Chief Justice of -the Court of Kiness
Bench, The question with him, WAS not whether Lord!'
alratuironelt should have a seat in the Cabinet ? buti ",
whether the Chief Justice of one of the Law Courts-
sbould become a Permanent Constituent Moiler of !
that Cceincil ? foreign writers pi all nations had
asserted, that it was improvident to mingle the dal 1'
ferent powers of the Government; and Monte.-
fltlieli says that the separation of the Legislative
an! Camino' brooches of Administration, is more
essentiarto the liberty of the subjeO, than Cie sepa-
ration of the Legislative and Executive. Nothing
can be more inconsistent with a free Constitution,:
and particularly with the basis of the British Con.'
stitnuomohan the union of the Legislative and Cri-
minal funfliont, in the same person. A Judge, *fend-
ing under the berthen of both those offices, was
identified with the Ministry, and could not be
considered as unprejudiced in his judicial capacity.
Suppose the case of a libel published against the.
political' administration of the country. In what
an arduous and critical situation would the Chief
Justice stand' himself a member of the body of-
fended, and Judge of the party offending. ft be-
' came a praaical question of the utmost consequence..
The Noble Lord was not apprehensive that any ill
consequences would result under the judicial lies**-
deny of the Chief Ju:tice of the present day ;
this was not an argument with a view to the
virtues or &fen% of any individual ; but a ques-
tion affertting the general expediency of an im-
portant measure. It bad been asked, way the
epoch of the Revolution had beep particularly ad-
verted to? He would teply, because at that time it
was solemnly determined, that the authority of
Judges Should be made stable, and rendered in
dependent of the Clown; and this provisions
had been ever since considered so salutary; that
in very few instances. and those on the pressure
of great emergencies.. had a departure from
this political neutrality of the Judges bait to-
lerated or become requisite. Special purposes,
and special occasions, would doubtless soruciutes
warrant the infraOion of a wholesome rule ; and
had it been advanced for the information of the
country, that any extraordinary occasion es-
isted for the introduction and advice of the Loid
Chief Justice in the Cabinet, this motion would. is
all probability, never have been heard of. In the
few instances that recourse had been had to this
step, when the Occasion ceased. the attendance of
the Judge as an active member of the Cabinet ceased
IllS'i. This had been exemplified in the case of
Lord Hardwicke, Lord Mansfield, and Lord
Kenyon. each of whom had been called by con-
tingency of circumstances to render temporary as-
siVance in the councils of the Sovereign; but
this was the first attempt at an innovation like
a permanent introduction of a criminal Judge
into these councils. All that was desired by the
supporters of this motion was, to maintain the Con.
stitution as it existed. It was not attempted to
curtail the privileges of the Chief Justice, but it
would be preferable, if that were the only alterna-
tive, that he had not been, by his elevation to the
peerage, possessed of a seat in this House ; than that
he was to be advanced from that to a permanent
seat in the Cabinet. However the Executise Go-
vernment of the country might disappoint the hopes
of the people, they ought never to be placed in a
situation, to be deprived of the comfortable reflec-
tion that criminal jastice was impartially admiais-
iced.

Lord HOLLAND et pressed his surprise that the
strange tendency of this motion found advocates
in the quarters where it was, this night, supported.
lle then proceeded, with considerable animation, to
observe upon the weirt,hty responsibility which
some oldie Members of the late .Idininistration had
incurred, and strongly deprecated the wanton iu.
troduCtion of the name of the King of Naples into
some political pipets which had lately been given
to the world ; and which had, by ondisguise,ly
chewing the relations between that Aevereign
and this country. exposed hint to the open vense-
ance of the Emperor of the French, - ahi
involved the Neapolitan Government in utter rule..
The responsibility which the Lord Chief Justice of
the Court of King's Bench incurred, by his intro.
duaion to a seat in the Cabinet, was re-illy nothing
more than he had been long liable to, and con-
tributed little more to render him a Minister of State
than heretofore; as, in his charlaer of a PriniCouri-
seller, he was at all times liable to becelled upon
by His Majesty for his advice. He•hd little ex.
peeled to have ever heard this House told that
We Legislates and Judic:.al Authoritiei fr.ie,
as matter of- policy and necessity. kart .riskialt.
The theories by which this hypothesis was one:used
to be 121114113.4 j, were illusory and dangerous;
such as much reserntiLd the speculatic:.s imbibed by
the French, during the Revolution. 1'...2 American
Government would not be considno t de2flllic ;
yet, it would be remembered, that the Chili Justile
-et:the United-States-had signed an impototat trelty
here, on behalf of his country ; and, etrea is
this Country, and since the arc to which atfalluaiaa
had been made, out of ten Chief Justices that lid
presided.six had beet called to assist in the Cabinet,
Aftes a few other observations, the Noble Lord to
pressed his conviction, that the blooding was sop.
ported on too slight grounds, to he enter:Anted by
the 'Molise. •
—I mid MV,Ltat XV b. eldeiled into a short espis-
natlOn.
Lord GIIVN VILLt commenced an able speech,
by stating. that He had littler to add to the obseres
tinny that had been so ably urged by his Nobi
Friends near him ; but, if there had beta any i ..
nation on she Constitution, as was charged by t•
supporters of this n4otinn; if there were any de~e
quency in havirg piOntoted the measure which
mos coloplaaied ••1; he was the person who make
the odium of it. for it was do ouglo his advie t. •
it had been aderpted. The thing, however, he it:
most 3.• sired, was to meet this discussion in Ibarl.
nient, in order that every impression which c
;my where be entertained of the impropriety of ''
measure, might be obviated. The princip!es u
'whibh the robjeaihns had been advanced. were the
which would go the length of destir-ryingthese,hols:
Inc of the ;Doyen:mem, by Mart ring the Severe
in the choice of his advisers, 'From the reroot
periods to •the present time, persons exercising j
.dicial °aces have been selected as fit person
assist in the commie of the King. In thin nips
Richard 2d, Henry, Bth, James Ist, anti Q
Amino *ecotone w had to the advice of the C
•
Justices; and a ,practice resting sin it,) other • •
than -those. of take and Mansfield. would be
slight precedent, open tibia even the mecum?,
'lesiss:mielit Ad. •A: the terminatioli c t the reiga
Queen Anne, the Cliief Justice scat called to .
.:alliotit, to co: saver the important treaties
hate to the sulee;oion of the Have oCiiiriovr
tilt Throne. Then ye come to the inmante
Load Mansfield; and alter all that we hail
aid heard of thik,charaeler Of that great mare
ilid 'not now coped to :lave beard ap imputstist
'cult upon. it.. The eel), occasiKal upon Ida Si tii
' eliief Jastiies had -boos called 21p1111/ IPS in pi
liriod oitessions. *l' weave% or other impottercl
fence,; over the pettifog ei•msnitting which? they hat
sin/swards sat as. YoZrges on Ow Inds ; as is d
case of lord Chief •histice Wed7ei burn, after d
riots of 1780. What, then, becidln of the
drawn difficulties of the advocates of this mel
A conscientious Judge, who would not :offer the le
of his King and Country to bias the disperoaficre
justice, would not hr worked up by any conOlerft
That he WAS ill,liV idu.sil y aggrieved by an ols:ntreo
mitted by a paltry libeller again-t the Govc:7'
of which he was a member. Whet: such an""
could be d
yby the cottony. the c mat
would bent Lentertaineower ordh.prescrving. ..The Ntt
Lorrd concioihol, be °bon visor. that be .had ne
known a edlotion attempted to he supported by it
cogent argton'ent.
Tne LORD CH A NC.r.LLOR mid; a
!rations against the Mot.on, otter witch it stare
and negatived without A diltitiaD...-MigUITICI

_--.-.
HOUSE 49 F COVIMUNS.

Mr. litluct !nought op a 1.-t.t.on from the PrieWc"
A.t.rd fur drat in the guil of Idor,liam, in the ea,.
111.01wraipenetng rttref —04.1 M to be ..n the table.
Mr. Shmalan, Mr Courtonas, Admiral Nlatitiams,
Wort M.:Niammi, took tn.. ~.its mitt their *Sill.
Mr Sli AWE LLFF.VRE said, he was des". d b'
Hottodrtlate Filmod of Ins, who was "taiga to tirt ere,
who had twit notice of be. int 1110,11 to ;nose the
laterite t.. tog ot a Salto red...se certain 4 rita•• tee c'k
Teeming AA, to po.r,mia, Cie 1.4,1 11.1,1 t :on WI Tbutelati
Was .1,04 0C.e.14111114.
M. W. iNJNIJAS ewe notica, that he 11.004. "n
goad ty Now. for !case to bilr.g oft a WU, 11.
the AA re.:411%• 10 1114111k1110411 ill Scar la which • •1' "
ON Silk§ M
Ntr, .\ntlet appter,l at tit,: tic a and .•
Potttion from the Lord hlatfor, Nttetthe,t. •I
ettowesia of the City of London, for ...Are to.
rtr
Market.—Onlerrd tr. be referred to a 4'..' L"
W. Nieto', from the India Write, uresettl.4 ).• *S.
porting to ire a Uorresitohillitee ktt twwirn taw
". fsl.o4' •
ler. Uotrernot-General of indoi, awl certain 8,0.1 •
pur.uout to the Order of the li.tute...-Ottioted

table.
Mr. T 'IUL, moved, Treat all the Tanen
on the Ta`tle tespecting 16014 AIf•ITS,
lIITZtaI M.O he had made, be linnted."
L.ed TEMPLE said, he had no obit/I:en se I,
It !tug urt..ted, ruluntiaoes 'help were. It case '
~l
Inch i.llpOrarKe, and every Men,lier wasold
tides it with mature dclixraaoo. As the ".
Intweeer, prote,,ed that he had moved for 'h..' •
• yaw tat a.oundsne ■ charge :guns% el,
h.q.,' he would not fail to bum; it forest& a, ‘, •
utmost consequence to the hot:crar and Chif....t• •
Friend, the, after what bad been suggeucd, 3
inquiry should take pia.. The llattourab:e tic
said, these Writ 41 the Tapers he intendvi , •
euhien. Ile would, therefo:e, reepot ..f t. I'
Gentleman to say, when he intendud to br,,;
Motion.
Mr. PAUL said, it wet now upwards ofo'•

. -
M b.td asee.d fur some of the e Papal. .".
jest Carat..bed le Use House AS Ices a'