The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser.
London, England, 1810-05-10 00:00:00

'ion. ft Lutl teeo the other er:t nit
t been sent in upon the subject. on. wlii..l
prayed, but he coaceived that it was sup-
at one being rejected, there existed no pro-
of the reception of any other. lie •con-
ih saying, that the practice of petitioning
encouraged by drat House, as by it were
:stet, au importance and a beuelit. waielt
13e, if it preserved a due regard fur its dig.
reputation, could never dispense with. The
of that petition occasioned the presents
others. He conntlered such a circular
i extremely important. Ile tout, stint in
%as against the laoguage used bi the
spoke last.
Werra *sd, that if the petisi„u ryas
by the rules of propriety, and couched us
not offensive to the dignity or honour of
~ he did not see the obligation upon
. to frame their resolutions in a manner
which ass repugnant or hostile to their feelings ;
obey were not obliged to repress the warm express
am of wit' sentimetits. 'Whether those
',rutted from their disapprobation of the conduct
•otthe Muse of Commons or not. or whether those
anminents were inspired by &vast or *nitration at
the mailattof other bodies of men ; he, however,
evuerived,. that the petition was far from
me calculated to gain the object winds it had
wddi,,,t its wish to attain ; for, time id of
ifeiag expressed is terns. which it was the prac-
Ike and the duty of raitioners to use, it ut-
tntd the tuom pips* abuse, and levelled
iiircoat the Hamm a 1 inguage moat grossly di...re:-
vv....nal. He here read in^ li!st ii in or the tvai.
thin, and *shed whether there could be any doubt
as hr she improper and &sit:vet:dui emit:cation
of the remark ? Hoilse should use its common
was , aid consider whetliat this petition was trout
th.oe a:lto were re,ling a redress of grievances, or
from the-c who were intent upon iiisolting that
H.loa.',to which it professed to amity fur, a remedy to
v.,1, n ittiolersidea: ilainittes. lie would not cutter
hats tlr que.t,itii or the privilegre of the House
saialsodiag the taws. He looked upon the Law
of Pali as a portieii of die Law of the Lind.
hie shold by which our ancestors hail guarded the
usaiwy against tyranny and usurpation; it had
ken roe:rived with its dignities and its honours by .
the pr,-eat to.uerstioii, and shoal be handed dawn
to posterity, in...allied cult tiaili.niaislied. lithos
these grounds, lie would tote fur the rejeNion of
the petitiu.i.
Sir Joits Naweinier said, that, front what he had
heard that night, lie was to CONCIU,I'. if was the
opium of Geatleineo. that the euaepda.its of the
people should be effectually rearre-til. sod con-
cealed within their bismins. If such was the case—+
if this temporary entice ihntti', for temporary it
would be, was inside,al upon, what would resiet
fiiias the ferineat of these taukiing agitation's
voli.ch would burst forth with aggravated tio-
'Pare and irresistible, 6.1? It aus a pitvilege
caalined to this conotry. that the subject showd
petiii.si, that he should to .'plain, ottirout dread, of
gnevaiices. and it WAS privilege 0,1111 winch
people would inn ru sty tl•s;:eose. It hail been
sod that tie was intruded by pickpockets.
This mammon lied been tirade fur the purpose of
depreciaiiiig the respectabili*y of the • Assemblys
raid establisnatg the rinneiple that no petitions at
yd+sh.eilit be treeive.t tram the tilt of London ur
Westminster. lle saris positive the (louse saw the
'handily of soca an jia:f 6011, and the impropriety
ut null a illOtIV• As to the point respecting the
passage from the ..trvet to the King's Beech,
thraw,th the Coin:who e hat was such a
thing s that calculated to produce? Was
it ant always the case ? It was wonderful that when
say revolutions pared lit that Hall, or esti. where
else, in favour of 41iiihoers, the assembly that
passed those resolutions were never dverguated with
the characters of turhislence .or dishosie4v' and
tover liianded with the names of utiscrea.nts and
pekpockets. Ile would warn Gentlemen opposite
lie they refused the 'mutton ; if they did, they
',mid not ht the first who rested toughies fir their.
sou destruction,. He concluded with observin
that the petition was re4prc fill, and the day u
which it Ihould he ref red would be reatertibru
red
trite Moony maul appreheusion.
K. PCSL begged to know whether it was
01.1 dcletinioation of (;entletneta to opr.t Cie doors
oi that itai.se for the reception f I? Hr
*Atli itekaintledge that it was o t
pin Il rear, to foreive an nfleii:e" art
kw:also:di"
fruits all no iey Niel prudence to lay on tire
e a pais r, the first *emelt w of which- assured
tue Units of the tameL
t.
_g,roas and nuituslified abuse
sf es tumble! ;
Ikwrr use t .use had beets cautioited to
n u the petition. He would
spar a Mat the 2t.
of it be most sedition-3)
s'-vded. Theft's:see 'dwell not require any submission,
or 1111,1111iO'benl from the petitioners,
. at the sante nom it should enter its protest
l'h-tt,ri.at..eltotumalt_mg. epithet or simmer censure. It
1111.1 that the couttstution of the Howse
It should. htiota.tri:eo great respect could be expected.
wit the }haw
of ect Ile considered. that that House
111'44 be tile a .d, as .111711, whatever
n stump d. ll .iust any individuate,
ury, He 4°4" "MA ill i:S original dig-
vs,
of thr gave minded vote agati.st the recep-
pe moo.
slr. Editor said. the II pure should be seesred
4::init minim and Leen;
abuse
wt.ato .
s ufenarinii. It had tw. iv Au attack
.e said, that
been written in language inceele
1.; it sown, it •oeht to be received. This
Qinettiltie like a circumstance iu privets lirerb'
hs:;;•51111,01.11fIdlel waster„
nu told by another. that he eatteeived
the unnesutiniiiii_oeu, itaahenPilvilledirre. This hating berm
If he hail pod:keeled. whereas
go" hi.ao the ohservations without having
ii..tinnLitnn:on. it simuld have been resented.
idr. Whitiere I.v,eeted Alyea the Hon. (;entlemate's
rims!). au ) opinion upana the subject of tin
Wiltraitean said,
Liao,t If for the hialeitage , a icing
that he had not pledged
h.
hof the petition, ltl '
mt , en his vote for its reception.
. Wsamm rose, as a Slmnber of the Haim "did the Liver
y or London—(A lime ). The
Head ' 4.'rr had been denonstuated factious dieutagovat.s,
eh .'sensedbr
'VI were B these
roidd
teef That they were not fad:-
1441 Mb esthi wet truth truth 'ewn ; sad as to fluor
1111 had ewer happened. It the Tact or

.ni?"1 le ,at elan.
—*Pt h.,' lot be
d set thii had pr
/i that
had l'"
hind.ty of
ler It rl , vet'
ouw. eh 11.1 be
I the clll Mee
hot the nl,el
I the pity all,l rtl
held rrCri•luof
"n• weal 017 01
Ited,
stance as
strong term
th 4 Gent. who
to go Mr. W.
hare hounded In
er CI
'ffec. language n
the ['env.
.Ihel the neuple
. .