The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser.
London, England, 1826-06-15 00:00:00

dealer—Charles Dalrymple, Old Brusd-street, merchant—Willie/a Ford,
Broad-way, litackfriararoad, wholesale tea-dealer— William Partridge
Birmingham, wharfinger and cJrri,o—John Walters, of the Hoinie,
fleretoru, d•oyer—Thomas Brewster, Wadessaill, Herein, 4-hire, I.ller,
—Thomas r.. Horsham, Susses, •oap-maker—William Smith,
Lombard-street, , ••r and hosier—James Brown, Liverpool, cal2net-
maker—Francis Pht. Newport, Isle of Wight, auctioneer and op-
pralser—Thomas Stroud, U ni on-street, Bath, linen-dealer--Warren Mande
lamb. Newcastle-upon-T)ne and Fdllield, Durham, merchant—Daniel
Pors.^r, Utley, Yorkshire, leather-dre.ser—Satnuel Shaw the younger,
31an che.ier, ,mallware-mauufacturer—John Kingafurd,Frucharch-street,
corn and eutir factor.

LA IV NO77CE.V.

COURT OP CHANCERY.

*KIWIS Tltt LOUD CHANCILLoIt, AT LINCOLN'. MI BALL, TUIS DAY,

AT 10.
uti on

The Lord Chancellor will sit in Lincoln.* Inn-hall. between the Term
and the First Beal. to hear hl remaining Motions, except Monday next,
the 19th instant, on which day bin Lerdshlp will hear Lunatic Petitions,
the Master of the Rolls sitting In the Vice-Chancellor's Court:

First Kcal Day, June T 2, before the Lord Chancellor and wce•Chan-
cellar.

ROLLS COURT.—Tnts Mt

General petition day, before the blaster of the Rolls, held in the Vice.
Chancellor'. court, Lincoln's Inn, thl. morning. at Nine.
Simpson r. Willis I Bailer v. Baxter Woolmore v. Burrow.
ottorney-(.en. Newman v. Newman I Gray v. Huntltyfield

Cornell v. Roßeston
Ready v. Firth
Gray v. II untlagneld
Same v. Same
Steffy V. Dm les

Esparta Bradley and
others
Fiparte Darien and
others
Ili!lout v. Routt

fieWbPuve v. Mitchell
Cutter r. JaCason
Ex parte Murray
Farrar v. bilovhull
Elwea v. Cann

- .
Ball v. Coutts
Deftly% v. Defiles

Store.; v. Sattney
Keene V. A 140p.t

Ileums v. the Beak
Fletcher v. Ilelxe

West V. Clarke

tieschell v. Parts
Williams v. Acker%
Nugee v. Langley
Howes v. Strathmore
Deardon v. Shiverlltre
Richards v. Maccles-
field
PontHex v. Short
Evison v. Ditewin
Shatreed v. Selby
Morgan y. Lord Claren•
don
Saxby v. Woad
Mutat v. Finch
Grant v. Hart
Winter v. Winter
Bradshaw v. Bradthaw
Pater T. Stewart
Town•hend v. Towns.
head
Nunn v. Barlow
Stone tr. Wishart
Lana v. Lana
Jaumand, v. Stria

Powell and

Esparta
William.
Wool v. Batchelor
Wlentiolt v. Logan
Wright v. Hamerton
Junett v. Parker
Petrie v. Wrote
If thins v. Steele
.herts v. Roberta
Wetherby v. Dixon
Swaine r. El.tou
Etparte Hutchinson
and another
Cann v. Caun
Brown v. Candler
Willand v. Willoby
Walker v. Ayrea
Guilleband v. Mears
In re Babraham
Charities
Dyer v. Casement
In re Dancer
Millard v. Robin.nn
Putinger v. Wylit man
Stubbs v. Jelkins

Frond •. VTOW

Pyerott v. Gregory
Massie v. lienwell
At.. Gen. v. Plumptree
Haulms v. Wolff
Pickford %. Rondall
Exparte Barnwell
Allen v. Allen
Coates v. Wych
in re United Briton*
Blackborne v. Evans
In re Harris
Parker v. Wlntosh
In re Warmnil
Grant v. Grant
Boller v. Lawrence
Brown v. Hodgvun
Norse v. Morse
Baker v. Bawer
Greenland v.Greenland
Allen v. Callow
%rehear/ v. Neatley
Batter v. M'Kenzie
In re Vl'arreu.

COURT OF KIN(:'!

PENcii.—Tilis MAY, A'
Middlesex Common Juries.
kin v. Patrick
Horne v. Kerr
Longhttrat v. Young
flinckes v. Mayer
Cutmore v. Towne 1
floe v. Morgan
WoodrofEe v. Faggeter
Partingt..n v. Pulley
Day v. Hunter
The King v. Hill.
ISrown v. firming'
Doe v. Kilner
Cadbury v. Shelia 1
Sealy v. Champ
fur the loot Sitting, sten&
the list for trial this day,

Doe, &c. v. Horn
Broome v. Winter
Veal v. Bondy
Kerhyshire v. Atnlth
Odell v. Smith
Dickinami v. Appleton
Callow v. Pearnou
Raymond v. Johnton
Conk v. Varney
Booth v. Hanley
Webster v. Belton
Baylor v. Dulbell
Thompson v. Caudle
The King v. Barker
The following awes
of the Term, will be In
Juttice
Turner v. Gibbons
Roden v. Salter
Edden v. Glover
l;a+h v. Baker
Brealley v. Noel
Allen v. Michell
Carbonell v. Mackrell
Doe v. Wright
Taylor v. Scotts
Turner v. Gunn

Tyndale v. Murray
Hely v. Prte.
Andley v. Otley
O'Donnell v. Lorymer
Doe v. Blake
Roper v. Combs
Doe v. Abbott
Eleven, v. Watson
De•borongh v. Coles
Harrison v. Andrews

COURT OP COMMON PLEAS.—Tuts
XIDDI.StoIX CAVSII,-41rrtso AFTER TRI
Middlesex Common Juries.—Reo
Whitmarshand another tiershke v. Robson
v. Oke and others Webber v. Nicholas
Cox v. Sharp I Hodges v. Read
New Causes.
Hill v. Herbert
Towne, gent. v. Crow-
der and another
Gay v. Rickman
Plimpton v. Denten
Macbeth v. Cooke and
others

Harvey and another,
gents. v. Hubbard
and another, gents.
Bolton v. Pickets
Doe v. Gurney & anon.
Ripley v. Thomson and
another

London eauses.—Slttia
Loudon

Ina after Trinity Term, It
1 Special Jurly.—lsaacs •
London Common Juries,
'Baryon v. Hardy
Hunt v. Buttivant
Hooper v. Hurst
Ware v. Juda
Lambert v. Turoley
Wilson v. Alder
Bird v. Hill

Davies v. Bahr
Fletcher v. Bottomley
Littler v• George

Willies v. Gaslight
Company
Charlton v. Cooper
Hopkins v. Bradberry