The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser.
London, England, 1825-11-25 00:00:00

GUILDHALL.

• . -
The LORD CuurcELLou—lt is quite impossible that I can
411040 so much time to the London theatres, at the expense of the
other suitors of the Court. I have done so before now, and I got no
credit ter it 4 sad unless yea eau show some special reason for my
masimseidag she maisgemeee of Covent-garden theatre, I can't do
wha► you maim.
.Ma HEALD—You have already, my Lord, in sours measure,
done so, by appointing a receiver.
The LORD CH•NCELLOR—If the parties have any diaputes in
the matter, let them be settled in the usual count.
WARD OF COURT.
. Mr. ROOTS said, that he had been absent yesterday whira an
injunction was obtained to restrain a Mr. Wells from communicat-
ing with a ward of Court. He had instructions to appear for one
-of the parties, and his absence arose from the circumstance of the
nodes of motion being given in another Court. He hoped there-
fete his Lordship would permit him to mention the cue to-morrow
Morning. and pledged himself not to occupy the time of the Court
for more than five minutes.
Hie Lordship assented.

VICR-CHANCELLOR'S COURT, Tricraspax, Nov. X
MINING SHARES.
STEtrEtc• v. GUPPY.
In this minim which was one relative to some property in a Mid..
lot eoneern in Warwickshire, a bill hid been filed by the plaintiff
to compel the specific performance of a contract made by the de-
•fradiant for the purchase of three sixteenth shares of the mines in
question. The mines ere situate at Coady, and said to be Or min.
aederable value. The amount of the purchase-money was MINK
On a former hearing, it had been referred to the Master tole-
treire whether the plaintiff possessed and could convey a good title
flthy shares. The Muter reported against the plaintiff's tit
ilwidelearse awed by inctarnbrancest. To this report the plat •
neat fled a bill of exceptions, and the cause same on to bear:
on the demurrer.
It was objected on the part of the detimillimt Ihat ills'
'ad been chargeable with a debt 0411,111111110apeetaturbleh mu
sresp
usrp•kl. There were also debts duo to the baubles el the
and a mortgage to a considerable amount to a pews a .11y.
.lard. Under those circumstances, it was argued that the enema.
brunets specified were such as prevented a free conveyance of the
Stit ; consequently the defendant could not be held to his contract,
" the plaintiff b.Mng unable to grant a valid title to the property.
For the plaintiff it was urged, that he was not obliged to clear off
the entire amount of the encumbrance with which the property was
ehargeable. It wan !sufficient, in order to enable hint to convey a
£i title, to discharge three sixteenths of the amount, that being
the proportion to which his shares rendered him liable.
The vIC t-Cwarin e Linn—All encumbrances must be cleared
orbefore the plaintiff can be in a situation to convey a clear tide to
the prop ty. However, I observe there are other objections to the
: pisiati f's title; the Court will hear them stated, reserving the
of encumbrance for future argument, in the event of the ob.
I:Ito
to the plaintiff's title being Incapable of support.
v. Pars row, for the defendant, proceeded to argue that the
offhlms/Ars title was not valid. The plaintiff claimed his title to a
. ~ of the property is question through a person named Thomas
whose right to the estate had not been satisfartorily ens-
. In order to discover the nature of Thomas Hickman's
(who claimed a heir and devisee of his father, Wm. Hick-
' k_the plaintiff had been required before the Master to produce
4111,0
of
. Instead of the will of the elder Hickman, plaintiff's
:410nmel peeduced An affidavit, stating that the will had been de-
. under ray peculiar and remarkable circumstances. In this
at it was alleged that shortly after the decease of his father,
..
. as Hickman presented the will to the steward of the manor,
'Vilma thinking it invalid, put it In the fire. Surely it was no emir-
=mower to the defendant to tell him that the steward enter.
auk an opinion, and had destroyed the instrunnot,
fr which,
ipt the defendant knew to the contrary, may have conveyed
in such a manner as would have destroyed the title.
f. Haar—When the will was produced to the steward, amordo
Pig tithe affidavit, he exclaimed, .• It is not womb a d—a," and
immediately burned it. This was because there wets not the ISOM
of three subscribing witnesses to the instrument.
, Mr. Illial.n, for the plainutl; argued that the land derived to
. t Isintiff through Hickman was only a piece of ground 36 yards
. and might be readily made a whieet for compensation.aVie
• e tenements had been erected on it, hut for them also a mons-
: penessioa could be allowed. The supposed will was drawn up by
a....,sofeeder-Inaker, and devised the 30 yards of land and nine tette-
* .0. „Aponte so TisOCIIII.A Hickman, on condition that his sister should be
remitted to inhabit one of the cottages during her life time. It
' WM a !Ude remarkable that the steward, who thought the will " not
worth • d—n." and who might have been wrong in his estimation
din validity, had, notwithstanding, permitted Thomas Hickman

. .

...s country, in pursuance s. .4 powers w..
which Yrisarri had been invested. The ban was fur 1,000,0001.,
issued in 10,000 special bonds of lON. each, and secured by a mort-
gage on the states of Chili, the mortgage deed being duly signed by
Yrisarri, and lodged in the Bank of England. De proceeds of this
loan were applied according to the orders of the.ates of Chili, and
paid over to the government, all but the sum due tor commission;
and also a sam of 200.0001. which was disbursed in payment of
bills of exchange held by Mr. Yrisarri. and ire the purchase of goads
and bullion to be sent over to Chili. The afiidavic of Mr. Hullett
also stated that the accounts of the whole of these transactions had
been laid before the Chilian government, and passed without a
tingle objection. There was also an affidavit of Yrisarri confirming
the whole of these allegations. The libel in the Morning Chronicle
consisted in a distorted detail of these facts. It will be recollected
that, in the course of the last session of Parliament, Mr. Canning,
in reply to some question which had been put to him, said that our
government could receive no person in a diplomatic character from
the South American states who was at the same time acting as. b.
commercial agent. Some time after this a letter appeared in tbil
Morning Chronicle from a correspondent, which stated that Mt
Hallett, on presenting himself at Downing.strest as Envoy keel
the United States of Rio de la Plata, had met with a thundering
refusal, which would put an end at once to his ever going there
again. The writer of this letter, which was the libel complalttedi
of, then went on to ask whether the ruling powers of South Amalie*
had taken measures for the removal of this obnoxious minister ? Lae
if they had not, there would he good grounds for thinking that dig
had themselves shared in the spoils of Throgrnorton-street, gm
which Mr. Hullett was now rioting at Paris, where he out-topped
princes in magnificence.
Mr. Justice B•YLEY—Does Mr.

manner.

exculpate himself from all these charges
Mr. SCARLETT—EntireIy.
The Court granted the rule.
Alt. ADAK moved for a rule to show

mation should not be tiled against M:
chant in Exeter, for a series of libel.
against Lord Rolle. Mr. Adam moved on
The libels in question consisted in a aerie
contrived in the most ingenious manner
object of the writer, which vas to annoy
written in a very peculiar hand, on hal -
on both sides, which were gent to the

&meet moat strongly the attention of .
sons into whose hands they might come. Six of *up bad been
written within the present month • one to the Bishop ef Exeter,
one to a Magistrate of the county of Devon, one to Lady Rolle, and
another to her Ladyship's housekeeper. The first of tbent was
written on the 3d of the present month. To this was appended, Isr
way of postscript, a nety.to the post.master, stating that if he did
not deliver it, according to its address, the writer would make a
complaint to Mr. ireeling, and have him discharged from his
office. Mr. Adam rend two of the letters, the contents of which
were most abusive and indecent.

Air. Jostle: BAYLEY—You have atiala% Its verifying the hand.
riling of Mr. %Versouth ?
Mr. AnAlt—Yes. eny
The CounT granted the rule.

ITATWOOD V. PITT.

This was an action for seducing the plaintiff's daughter. It was
tried at the last Assizes' for Worcester, and, upon a suggestion of
the Learned Judge, a verdict was entered for the plaintiff, with one
thousand pounds damages, to be set aside if the defendant should
marry the plaintiff's daughter within one month.
31r. RUSSELL. on a former day of this term, moved to set aside
this verdict, en the ground, that though the defendan t had procured
a license and a ring, and had taken a post-chaise to the residence of
the lady for the purpose of carrying her to church for the solem-
nisation of the ceremony, she had nevertheless refused to marry,
preferring, as it seems, the thousand pounds to the defendant.
3lr. C•xenr. tr. now showed awn on affidavits, which he said
proved the defendant to have acted towanls the lady In the most
deeei Ail, heartless, and seandaleuo manner.

Mr. Justice BAyi.ry asked whether this could not he referred
to some gentleman ont of Court to see what ought to he done.
Mr. CAMPBELL said thet he could not accede to this suggestion.
There were facts disclosed in the affidavits which made it Impossible
that her friends could ever infer her to be contaminated by an union
with such a man.

Mr. Justice BAYLEY—There are many °cautions on which we
feel oursel►es bound to believe the fatty which aro disclo.ed in the,
affida►its, but that is not a rule to which we are necessarily con.

-----
Mr. Russat.t.—lf my Learned Friend would not use each 1
1 strong language they might still be married.
51r. Justice Bayt.er again suggested a reference.
After the geotlemen concerned in the cause had conferred for a
cousiderable time,

" I consider the above submission to the High Court of De.
legates most full and complete on my part, and I appeal to the jus-
tice of this Honourable Court to deal out a measure of equal justice
towards one of its own officers, who had been knowingly and wil-
fully guilty of the same offence against the dignity of the Court
under more aggravated circumstances ; and I pray the Court that
he may be pronounced in contempt, unless he retracts the expres.
alone he then used, and makes a satisfactory apolosv.
" W. BRIICOE.
" To the Register of the High Court of Delegates."
Dr. STODART said, that be and his Learned Colleagues eon.
sidered this a matter of great importance, requiring deliberation.
The Court would thereffire retire for a short time.
The Coulltv then retired to an adjoining apartment, and remain.
ed in deliberation for a few minutes. ‘Vhen they returned,
Dr. STODART said, that the Court thought this matter one
which ought to have every possible publicity. As to the apology of
Sir W. Briscoe, the Court was of opinion that he had done himself
credit by that apology, and that it was satisfactory in its terms.
Under this impression they could not, in courtesy, refuse to accept
the submission 4 and on this point he had authority to declare, that
the Court was perfectl•satiahed. As to the matter of what may be
called Sir W. Briscoe's second letter, the Court was of opinion that
the officer alluded to should make an apology for the expressions
he had used, and retract unequivocally what had fallen from him.
Unless that officer did apologtse for his expressions, by retracting
them, and stating that Ere had no intention to insult the Court, he
must be considered in contempt. As this matter, however, may
have come suddenly on the officer alluded to, the Court did not
desire him - . .
pared
Court
M.

desire of the Court that no allusion should be made to it in future,
and that the particular Individual to whom the offensive expressions
were st }fret addressed should eonsider that the matter had been
taken out of his hands, and was altogether a question tor the
Court.

Dr. JENNEI (to whom the offensive epithets were addressed)
was about to speak, when he was interrupted by
Dr. STODART, who observed that it did not appear to the Court
that Dr. Jenner had any claim to be heard on the point before it.
Dr. JENNE It said he thought, in Justice to himself, ha ought to
say, that milieu the apology offered, by Sir W. Briscoe could be
considered to contain an unqualified apology for the opprobrious
epithets used towards him, independent of the apology to the
Court, he could not, nor would not, be satisfied with it.
Dr. STODART—Sir W. Briscoe says he unqualifiedly retracts
the expressions he then used.
Dr. Jam eta—Ain I to consider that as addressed personally to
me, as well as to the Conn ?
Dr. STODAIIT—That is a question which the Court should not
be asked, and ought not to answer.
The Court then inquired whether Sir IV. Briscoe was prepared
' to proceed with his petition, and :dr. Glennie, hi. Proctor, saying
that he had no directions to proceed,
Dr. STODART observed, that the Court had decided to rearm-'
eider Sir W. Briscoe's use, u a matter of favour. Be should, I
therefore, have been prepared to proceed with it.
Mr. GLENNIE said he had only to pray the Court to allow the
matter to mend over until the next Court to-day.
Dr. STODART—Thu would only produce the effect of delay
which has shently been Fa much reprobated in this case. Unless
Sir W. BlilCoell petition shall be given in three days before the
nett Court-day, he must be considered in contempt.
The bighorn of the Court terminated here.
Dr. LEE was proceeding to address it, upon some proceeding
which he considered "contrary to the principles of bf agnaCharta t"
but before the Learned Dr. had di.tinctly explained the object he
Is is view, the Court became empty, he was left without auditors,
and Dr. STODAIIT observing that Mete was no 'question before
them, his Learned Colleagues nano, and the Court adjourned.
The livry Gazelle leys—A The poor girl who wag shot
with pease, as mentioned /alt week, is since dead of her
I wounds."

SEDI7CTION.—Mr. Frisby, s -reapeetable fruit salesman in
Fleet-market, applied to Mr. Alderman ANSLEY yesterday for
his advice under the following melancholy circumstances:—
His daughter, he said, not yet fifteen years of age, the eldest
aids seven children, had latterly been residing with her grand.
mother in the Old isiley ; and a person in the same line of busi-
ness with himself, a neighbour, who had known his daughter from
her infancy, had availed himself of the intimacy that naturally
subsisted among them to effect her ruin last week. What added
greatly to the guilt of her seducer was, that he bad a wife and four
children living; that up to this month he had been cohabiting
with his wife's sister, by whom also he had a family of children,
and that he was a man far advanced in years. His daughter, who
was rather handsome, and remarkably tall of her age, disappeared
on Saturday night, when, it seemed, she took refuge in her se-
ducer's counting-house, and on the following day he carried her
into Essex; but her ruin had been completed, and she had, for
the most part, sojourned in one of those detestable houses in Shire-
lane. flee relatives searched with the greatest anxiety in every
direction, without gaining the slightest clue to her fate, until
Wednesday night, when his wife received a hint, and followed
the heartless villain till she saw him join her lost child at the
entrance of a passage leading from Bridge-street towards the
Temple. She instantly pounced upon them, and seized her daught.
ter's arm, while her companion scampered off as fast as his legs
could carry him. She was now in a place of security; and, as
an additional impediment to her appearing abroad again, he
had clipped off every luck of her beautiful hair. Her seducer
had some of her apparel now in his hands, and he wished to
know if the Magistrate could not assist him in the recovery of it.
The applicant and his wife seemed deeply affected while relating
these particulars.
The worthy Alderman, who sympathised with their feelings,
immediately granted the required summons.
Sarah Manning, a young woman apparently in a state of in.
sanity, was charged with attempting to destroy herttlf in the Court
of Requests on Wednesday morning. She too was a wretched vie-
'-t. of - • ' • • living • 2enchureh-
persons em.
enticed her
turned her
for 31. he
he !m-
-elte saw

table kuife,
knees, and
when her
may be

appear to be
Sir Richard
request the

.t to recover
unlawfully,

a young
smiled Ihesitatal,

discouraged by
snugly as pos-
. old couple as
well as we could. And so, Sir, accordingly, we had the bans put
up in the church where she lived, and last Thursday three weeks,
being out-asked, as they call it, we met early in the morning at
the church-door • the clerk of the pariah " stood father," and we
were married. had been before arranged that she should return
to her parents immediately after the. ceremony ; and if she failed
to bring them to agree to the match, that she should come back to
me on the next Sunday, and we were to take all the consequences
upon ourselves, and remain together in spite of them. Her father
said mother, however, upon learning that we had got married, re.
fused to listen to any apology, or come to any terms, and have
ever since kept their daughter locked up, and refused even to let
me see her.

Sir R. BtaxzE—Then the marriage has never been consum.

Applicant—Why, Sir, we have never been to bed together, if
you mean that. (A laugh.)
Sir R. Biaarit—How old are you both ?
Applicant—l am twenty, Sir; and my wite about eighteen.
Sir R. BrairtE—l think you have been rather overhasty in get-
ting married. Take my word for it, you had better have waited a
little longer.
Applicant—Why, Sir, that may be ; but we were both in the
humour.

Sir it. BIRNIE-0, that I don't doubt. lam afraid I cannot
assist you in recovering your wife—as you call her. Where were
you married ?
Applicant—At Wanstead.
Sir ►t. ilinwra.—And did you both live there ?
Applicant—No Sir. She lived at Wanatead, and I lived at

Sir R. BIRNIE—And were the bans published in both the
churches ?

Applicant—No, Sir, only at Waoattad.
Sir R. BIRNIK—Theo 1 am afraid your marriage is not worth
much ; but, however, I will not give a positive opinion upon the
subject. I have no power to assist you. I can only advise you to
go and speak pretty to the father, and see what you can do with
him. You spoke pretty to the daughter, of course, or you would
not have succeedetl.wita her.
Applicant—Shy, Sir, I don't know as to tltat---I tarpon I did—.
but then the father and the daughter are very different sort of per-
sona to deal with, don't you see, Sir?
Sir R. BIRNIE-.-Well, I can do nothing for you. I can't re-
cover your wife, that is certain, and, as I said before, your only plan
is to endeavour to coax the old people to give her up.
The applicant seemed very loth to go away with this answer, and
remained loitering near the bench until an officer told him he
could have no other answer than that which the Chief Magistrate
had given hint.
Samuel Sharp. an elderly man, holding the situation of a stamper
of letters in the Inland Department of the General Post-office, was
brought up by Ellis, one of the principal officers, charged on
suspicion of stealing eight letters belonging to different persons,
yesterday morning, while on his duty.
It appeared that Mr. Vandergucht. the President of the Inland
Department, in the midst of the business yesterday morning, saw
the prisoner go through one of the lobbies leading to the Inspoc-
tor's office, with two letters in his hand, and before he reached the
end of the lobby, he saw hint put one of the two letters into his
pocket. Mr. Vandergucht immediately called him aside, and
asked him for the letter which he had put into his pocket, and the
prisoner, without hesitation, took out eight letters, all of which
proved to have come by the post that morning. When asked to
account for the possession, in this way, of the letters, he said they
were letters that had been mis-sorted, and he aas taking them to
the inspector to get the money returned which he had in the course
of his regular duty paid for them.

The prisoner made this the line of his defence before the Magis-
trate, but the Inspector swore that they were not mis-sorted
letters. One of them only was sworn to as being a double letter.
The prisoner was remanded until a future day, when the
parties to whom the letters ate addressed will attend to open them
and give evidence.
QUEEN-SQUARE.
TILE CASE OF CETTING AND STADBINO.—Mrt. F. Carter
the wife of James Carter, whom she had unhappily cut and stabbed
on the evening of Lord Mayor's day, and who has ever since been
confined in Tothill-fields prison, was yesterday brought up by
Popk, sen. the principal turnkey.
in consequence of an application at the Westminster Infirmary,
by Gilmore, the chief constable, the following note was given by
Mr. Maitland, the house-surgeon.
" 1 hereby certify that James Carter is out of danger."
After the above note was handed to Mr. White, the sitting Ma-
gistrate, he gave directions foe Mu. Carter to be brow ht from her
place of confinement. She soon after came into the office, attended

of Requests on Wednesday morning... She. too wat, a. wretcl
Mr. How wr --Yes, my Lord ; but I have the satietsction to The information was accordingly dismissed. mean way of getting business, and if an attorney will make himself
tam of seduction,
. She had been living in service in Fen
responsible he must bear the consequences ; we cannot help him.
tell you, that you'll have to hear only one Counsel on.eaeb side. At the suggestion of the Counsel for the information. hit Honourstreet, and had formed an acquaintance with one of the pera
Rule refused.
COVENT-OARDEN THEATRE. directed "a declaration that the Fellow and Scholars of Pembroke
----own--_ ployed in the India Company's warehouses there, who enti
coxay V. HARRIS. Hall, Cambridge, on Archbishop Griudall's foundation, were en. to leave her place; and after living with her for a week, tun
~; Ms. ITTAS.D stated to the Court that there was a motion which titled to the same privileges and emoluments as the other Fellows COURT OF EXCHEQUER, THURSDAY, Nov. 2S. adrift. She summoned him to the Court of Requests ft:
loa was tegnaland to make In MO cause, relative to the appointment and Scholars of the establishment, and • direction that they be so had borrowed of her, and having disregarded the summons,
-•. -+ . at A:P.4W vent.orden Theatre, tie, bed been placed with regard to these advantages." IltiNo business of public Importance came befbre the Puient Basotts peered on Wednesday upon an attachment. As soon as
is , a °face to granting etsetVi:Hi owanees to the him in Court she attempted to stab him with a small tabli
which the totems coal loafs ea. Ist amps
eppeakion, the receiver Mil boa eanaineenind la COURT OF KING'S 8R44„,..T.... a,
Tittfrilliar, Sa..• •
, ~.• to-Ttlahye.
great difficulty from the stoppage of the money. The motion, The Lord Chief Justice was again abeam, in consequ ee of Ms
04#0.
LORD C stw aUtott was again asenpflal in hearing the
' COODOU . the tithe caw of Pare V. Make.' and lie waking his mope, she threw herself upon her kne,
was about to plunge the weapon into her own bosom wt
• op application to the Court on the subject, es the theatre was
..,_ _ t
HIGH COURT tl; E-"1"."--LEGATES, Ti•Rmatirtax,lNov. 24. nhilhaalleiraclueasifnteatidigidiiitethaeueliarcuremmstaannaceel. that
her
fttehda
theUsened Counsel said, had been for some time before him, and continued indisposition. The Court consisted, the gr er part of _
DONS.-STREET.
as it pressed so much on a public concern, he was urged to mention the day, of Mr. Justice Bayley and Mk. Justice Litt Mr. SIR WASTZLL lIRISGOE th LADY E*ISCOE. Yesterday a simple-looking youth, who did not slope
Seto his Lordship, and] trusted his Lordship would now allow him Justice Hoiroyd being engaged In the Bait Court. The Judges present were, Drs. STODART, DAUBENTNDOD- more than 17 years of age, presented himself before Sir 1
to infirm the parties that the motion would come on first to- CRIMINAL INFORMATIONS. SON, GOSTLIXO, ADDAMS, and LEE. Birnie, and, making • very lowsente,
bow, said he had to reqt
morrow. Mr. ScanLETT moved the Court, on the behalf of Mr. Hullett, Upon the sitting of the Court, the Register stated the'. he had re- advice of his Worship as to the best means to be adopted to
Tins LORD CAA/MELLOR—What's to be done with the other of the house of Hullett and Co., merchants, Throgmorton.street, ceived a letter from Sir W. Briscoe, in reference to what had passed his wife, who was improperly, and, as he conceived, unlit
matters which are axed for to-morrow ? for rule to show cause why a criminal infortnation should not on the last Covet-day, which he desired permission to read. kept from him.
Mr. llcaxm--My Lord. I have only to state the circumstances be tiled against Mr. Clement, the proprietor of t
onhe Morning The Court having granted its permission, the Register read a Sir R. BiliNlE—Your wife! What, have you already
or the case as I have been directed, and them I have done with the Chrosick, for a libel published in that paper Mr. Hui- letter to the following effect : into the bonds of matrimony ?
COollettl. lat. Her moved on affidavits, which stated that Mr. Ilullett " Sir,—l beg you will stare that I had no intention of offering Applicant—Yes, Sir, I have done so. I had courted a
Mr, kinDogn paid, he was on the other side, and was at a loss had, preous to this libel being written been appointed Envoy the slightest insult to the High Court of Delegates in what lady for some little time, Sir, and (here the youth smiled,dic
to know what right this motion had to precede the other business. to this country by the Government of the United states of Rio escaped from me on the last Court-dy. I now beg to apologise for and hung down his head) my suit being rather disc
Jir. BCALD-1 was instructed bv Mr. Hart and the solicitor de la Plata ; that, in the year 1112.2, he had contracted with those expressions, and, in obedience to tne commands of that Ho. her father and mother, we agreed to get married as snugly
to apply as I have done to your Lordship, as the case was one of a Yriserri, the •agent of the government of Chili, for a loan to nourable Court, retract those expressions in the most unequivocal bible, and afterwards to endeavour to conciliate the old cc
very pressing nature. that country, in pursuance of the commission and trwers_with manner.
. .

desiro him on rite moment to advance anything, unless he one pre-
.lf ullett, in hls last affidarit, pared to make the apology which the Court demanded. The
urges? Court was willing so allow him full time for consideration.
Mr. To‘nsend (the Procter alluded to) said he would rather the
Court would do him the favour to hear him at once. Sir W.
how CUM why a criminal infor. Briscoe having retracted the expressions he aildreseedto Dr. Jenner,
Ur. *forge Weymouth, a inter- and having satisfactorily apologised to the Court, he (Mr. Town-
libels which he had published send) was prepared uoauivocally to retract the words he had used;
oared on his Lordithip'x affidavit. and whilst he disclaim all intention of offering the slightest of-
ri a saris. pf learn. Ilse, were faisiomuheligigt of Court lie hoped the Court would accept
'antler possible for effecting the his apology toFffleifirpliAlona tliettwiwar•• - •
annoy Lord Rolle. They were Dr. STODAHT said, the Court tionaidered the apcdogy made by
half a sheet of paper, scribbled Its officer sufficient, and that they were bound to absolve him, as
he post.otfice, untested, so as to they hat already done Sir W. Briscoe, from the contempt of the
f the post-muter and other per. Court. The matter having terminated in this manner, it was the