The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser.
London, England, 1819-11-12 00:00:00

i r~

'dips articles of the peal* against -wies— Milne. a
gistratir for the county a Lincoln. Front the rt..
ttibitant's affidavit it appeared that be seas owner
d a portion of glebe land, which adjoined *rime
inil belonging to Mr. The latter gave
hint notice dirt he would proceed szaiiiiiit been at
Iris:, fur the purpose of recovering the glebe land
out eel his rooceeeeime. Hut, wohaut any Irgal pro.
c-• ding, he had thought proper to commence re.
nimoing the Exhibitatit's &e. This
Is.", resisted, and Mr. Milne in consequence
li:oted a large lire, for several "riccessive days,
in the mitlet of Exhibitinit's prceperty, to the
manifest (linger thereof. One pert eel
his 110119.
"40 thatched, nod the tire was so near that portion
• ll' a. WY 10 create considerable alarm for the safety
the !Hahne. He therefore prayed that Mr.
Milne might lie compelled to enter into securities
Min In molest Ila 3 prOpelty further.
The (701: wr refused tee grant articles of tine peace,
tr• s lei u proceeding. tile revert to property, was
lorrt.ctly nurel. Ben thry ranted it rule It) silt!W
why au attachineut should Hut issue opp:it
Mr. Milne.

CORPORATION sEILTABBLr..
Pt Num V. Wk.t.t.
Mr. TAVNTON moved for • rule to sheer canoe
%Ott; the verthct for the Defendant in this ease
.hotohl not he pet aside. anti ta new trial granted.
It w... ar. artion for :e.q.init and calt.e imprisonment.

and wH, Inert before Mr. J Ifolroyil. •t the
.• late For Berkshire. The Plaintiff, it sp-
oVateft, W:l4 our of the burgesses, or, as 'hey were
tlettomotateil by the Leoroetl Coo ottri for the 1)e-
-fend:tot, (toe of the postrallepers of the bortongit of
Abingdon, in which there were two partirs—rwi,o.
tutiottishr and intii-corintrationists. Tile Plaiiitiff,
nips eproseteri the e:tuse of the hitter, was invited to
ogmind dinner, given in hoopoe of tilt election of
a %Ir. Hawkins to the (Acesa. Niist or. The Plain-
tiff.' in the course of the ereriiirg, gave +.Bl ob-
noxious toast—when a cry of " turn him out!" woe
raised. The roosetprence was that Stroud, • tyth-
il coralacted him out of the room, outs which
he soon after returned, and used abusive Isogon* to
\lr. West. Ikons turned out a second time, sod
81.8oveyed in the house of the borough-gaoler, where
e was confined for three hours, mold he procured
bed. He supposed that the assault anti inquires'.
;twot were canoed by tie order of Mr. West, sod

against ht. lie brought his •coon. Two witnesses
swore positively dist Mr. West had given the or-
elrr—lptit, on the ,other hand, Stroud and Mr.
ISteiglit. • fttigi.trate, deposed that the order was
given be• !llevrs. linigin and Capper—and, in Con.
sespienert, a %ticket one given for the Defendant.
▪ Vainito;) now ceetre4ltil, that ihr eVldriker for
tie Ylaintiti clearly prisvad that Mr. ‘Vert had
• the order, ■nd therefore that the verdict
►i:onld have been for the Pismia.

The Court field. that the 11 right of ...rickey was
inviter for Om cooriderat. of the Jury. Thej•
Lad decided that it was ise favour of the Defendant,
nod no jowl rause load bent adduced for cLatutb..
tug the WV(llo.—Rule refused.

COURT UP COMMON PLEAS,
1111:1(111111V, NOVEMBER 11.

WELLS r. MIMING.

Setj.ant VAVGLIAN stated the case for the
Plow,. ff. It tai au action brought fur recovery of
871. 3.. the amount of a promissory suite, dated
9th Juile, 1817, and trussed by a person of the
113 ate of Milt. conjointly a ith the Defendant in
tilts cease. The auloont was to have been paid by
srvrtatit tostalstieutik and war really due by Calla,
who outssequeutly itcsine a bankrupt, mud was
o.sly fibre to pay to his creditor« tru 'settee in the
foment. The bistro:nerd wut authentirmted by a
otr.rk of the Plaintiff's solicitor, Mr. Lyard, who
slaved that he had advised U promissory note, in
joefesenee to a bond, its order to save expense.
Mr. Serjraut BLOSSITT, for the Defendant,
▪ tits was a transaction where three parties were
coccerised, the Plaintiff, the Deft-sirloin', and Bath.
clorestbsst. would irise nut of the case—first,"
whether the note had not been fraudulesitly °fi-
lar:wit by Wello—aecondly, whether the terms in
%Lien it was drawn up did nut stipulate for a
u•strionv gain. Bath kept the Crapes public-house
▪ Ealrer, to Surrey, and dealt with the Plaintiff,
ali., was a 'newer, fur beer. lu the latter end of
Itsth be became embarrassed iU Isis affairs, and
Isreing previmealy obtained from the Plaintiff fool.
In forot,ii Isis boom, upon the presumption that
I. • alle to supply the household
if the l's ince of Saxe-Coburg with beer, be
Ississal Isitn.tif unable to discharge the debt, and
4;,lither sum 1/1 sot also advanced by the Plaintiff'
tat 111111. Toe Plaintiff brcame aware of his
ro.:slveccy, Hod to sccure 'outsell he hail
recstirse to an artifice which went to defraud
the Other creditors. Ile wrote to Bath, stating
that it nimbi be to his (Bath's) advantage to
supp!.est in future with London potter in
pr-ferruce fir that which the Plaintiff had stud
sn, as be w.sts to have had the custom of the
Lropsslsi'y establislintesst ; he therefore re-
..sssmiserstlesl biro to Mr. Elliott, a Loudon brewer.
•1 hi. was dusty by the Plaintiff in order to avail broo-
m 'int a pi-butler which had alwrqo preemie(' in the
isas:se:y, fur the new brewer to discharge soy
I.f a new customer to the brewer with
V.lll/111 Ise dealt before. According to this custom,
hl r. Elliott undertook to pay the PI • 'lt the 1001.
t: 4. to ;sun by Bath, who, however, bud by this
hers, guilty of a baud towards other cre.
clews, ktiouing as be did that Bath was on insol-
se.t at the time. The other sum of sot. ass the
1.1111 'skit funned the ground of this inztiusi. The
I ,te, foe that sum was papered on the very day that
Air. Elliott undertook to pay the Soul., and was
▪ tslttamed tooter fraudulrait circumstances.--
The Plaintiff offered Bath to iiittrtere for him with
Isis other crethtors, and to prevail on them to accept
st.f a SUM Of .;%. is, the pound, provided Bath would
t a solvent person to join bun its it cote for the
noir sum tine to iiiinstlf. This Bath promised,
mod the consequence was, that the Defesidant was
i sr-laced. ignorant as llamas of the real circumstances
ofailiath, to join him in the note to the Plaintiff.
Tim Lew:sett Serjeatit next proceeded to he that
Itin 4 oir is.sa striated by us usurious tlgtrieqlCl.ll. 1111.
✓snitich as it stated that if there should be a failure
a s paying any of the iustalmeuts when due, the
pinto.* Tumid be liable not wily to the principal,
hut tam to the whole of the interest ti.st would
bate accumu'sated upon it. This sutici dation of