The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser.
London, England, 1825-03-07 00:00:00

Cams, pa

Trinidad - - io o a ii 0
Brazil . . 45 0 a 45 0
Pepper. per lb.—Black - . 0 8 a 0
Pimento - - - - -010 a 0 1048 i
flinger, per cwt.—Jamaica white - 200 0 a 240 I
Barbadoes 120 0 a 140 0
East India 18 0 a 40 U -
Ram, per gall.---leunaica, 16 O.P. - 2 0 a 2 2
Leeward*, corn. and proof 1 7 a 1 0
Hides, per lb.—Buenos Ayres, dry - 0 9 a 011
salted - 0 6 a 0 6
Brazil, dry - . 0 74 a 0 9
salted - 0 6 a 0 13
'Welt India, dry - 06ia 0 ir
hide - .. _ -

Norm, per
Rite, per cwt.—American
Brasil
East India
Indigo, per lb.—Caracca

40a I 0
Iv 0 a 22 0
00a 0 0
18 0 a 20 0
8 0 a II 0

Guatimala 7 6 ; 15
Bengal violet and fine do. -13 0 a 16
Purple - 14 0 a 16
Ordinary • 4 0 a 11
Logwood, par ton.--Jamaica and Honduras 205 0 • 210
Campearhy - 231 0 a 0
St. Domingo 210 0 a 22e
ilatit, pa ton.—Brazil • - 0 0 a 0
Spanish and Jamaica . 180 9 a 210
Cuba - - . 260 0 a 0
Nicaragua Wood, per ton.—Large and solid 760 0 a ROO
Small - 400 0 a 520
Linwood—Angola - - 170 0 a 180
Gaboon . - 130 0 a 180
Mahogany, per foot.—Cuba . - 1 6 a 1 1
Honduras . - 1 0 a 1

St. Domingo . - 2 0 • 3 II
Cotton, rt lb.—New Orleans - - 1 2 • 1 1
Tennessee, Alabama, & Bow'ds 01l a a 1 4
Sea Islands - - 1 fi • 211
Stained ditto - . 1 2 a 1
31ina, Genes, and Nora. 011 • 1 I
Para, 31aranharo, and Bahia 1 1t • 1 4
Pernambuco . . I 2 • 1 •
Surinam, Demerara, & Derbies I 2 a 1 4
Batbadoes, Bahama, &c. - 011 a 1 2
Uarthagena . - 0 104 a 0 104
Egyptian - . I 1 a 1 4
_ _

Batibon
Bengal and Sutat
Tallow, per cwt.—Rumsia Yellow Candle -
Brazil .
Oil, per ton 234 gal.—Gallipoli
per ton, 24 cwt.—Palm .
Tar, per brl.—Amrrican
Stockholm, &c.
Turpentine, per cwt.

_
- 1 3i • 1
- 0 8 a 010
42 0 a 43 •
42 0 a 44 0
9CO 0 a 1080 0
490 0 a 620 0
- 14 0 a 16 6
- 13 0 • 18
8 6 a 13 6

IMPORTED PROM THE MTH PPRIV•RT TO THE 4111
MARCH, INCLUSIVE.
Coffee . 189 bags. Gum . - 30 casks.
Ashes 70 barrels. Sumac - 10 bags.
Funic. . 82 tons. Pepper . 84 bags.
Oak Bark - 171 tons. Rice 167 casks.
Flour • • 2,113 barrels. Clorer Semi . 579 casks.
Turpentine - 1,129 barrels. Cotton :

Tobiceo . 120 II has.
Elephants' Teeth 149
Flax Seed - 1,702 casks.
Hides (co w or ox) 2,1100
salted - 430
dry (horse) 3,215

Eiiiiiani - 2.451 bales.
New Orleans - 1.135 bales.
Other American 17,905 bales.
Brazils . 973 bales.
European - . 219 bags.

SHIPPING INTELLIGENCE.
FROM LLOYD'S LIST.

PoorsmorT tr. ADAK'S 4.—Went out of harbour the ship
Madras, for l'iladras, having undergone a thorough repair in his
Majesty's dock-yard, and taken her cargo on board, to sail to-
morrow morning if the wind should continue as it is now.
VAIIKOUSH. MARCH 4.—The brig Juliana, Richardson. of
Onernsey, which was driven on shore on this beach, was got off last
night, and brought into the harbour for repair,.
°RAVI:SEIM, MARCH 4.—Arrived the Planet, Osborn, from
Smyrna; Prince of Orange, Horn, from St. Michael's; Rising
Sun, Edington, from ditto; Dispatch, Johns, from Denia ;
Watchful, -Rutter, from ditto; Magnet, Taylor, from Fayal ;
Alexander, Oulbag, from Ulaberg ; Minerva, lloct. from Nor-
way ; Thirst, Rogers, from Hamburgh ; ‘'olusia, Thorpe, from
ditto; Curlew, Aikenhead. from Bordeaux; Vickery, Wilschat,
from Worcum ; Elenora, Schwan, from Koniaberg- Sailed the
Britannia. Fox, for Hamburgh.
FLUSHING, FEL 26.—The Columbus, from New York to
Antwerp, still remains on the Sand Creek Bank ; the whole of her
cargo is landed-232 bags of coffer damaged ; they are endeavouring
to get her off:

The Man, Hope, from Ramsgate to Rio Janeiro, was spoken
with 29th January, lat. 19, long. 23, by the Wanderer, arrived at
Plymouth.
The departure of the Jamaica Packet is postponed till IVednes-
day net.
Vicsasms SPOILW ICITU—The Mary Hope, of Dundee, from
Ramsgate, for Rio Janeiro, 29th Jan., Margaret. of Barbados.,
from firearioek for Madeira, 19th Feb., Worrell, from Liverko:
for Leghorn, 29th Feb., rctoria, from London for Trinidad, IP
. ,
Feb., by the Wanderer, arrived at Plymouth ;rovidence, arrived
Ardent, (Mai
verpool for St Jago de Cuba Feb- 27. by the P •
at Plymouth ; Elearor. from London for the West ludiee, Feb.:3•
by the Ueneral Brock, arrived at Plymouth.

LAW INTFLLIGENCE.
COURT OF CHANCERY, SAT 1311134 Y, MARca
Scul

BELOI/UA
51r. HonNt moved for a
following circumstances :.--The
has just attained the agewf 21
was sent to this country when al
of being educated. boon tim
leasing the plaintiff entitled 1.
defendant, Jacob Belgrave (wh
tutor, and trustee for the plain'
dcred any stat►ment of the s•

was very much and very agreeal
Mr. Jacob Belgrave in this co,
hi...object here was two or
brought him about two thousand
place, he had come prepared to sett!'
beyovd all thin, he had brought
amiable daughter, most adnn
gentleman the happiest Man •
Sure begged the plaintiff so I
of accounts; and also in leading
sacred place, on retiring from
The,plaintiff, however. not* ith&
the West Indian complexion, pato,
come by the irresistible blandislimem
grave, he consented to marry '
panel, which wasa general rk
31r. Belgrave from all claims
strip. and it was at the same
deed contained a clause, provi
irhtnediately to the plait tift:
the thirteenth or fourteenths
coveoanted to give her at
part of the property he may ...
all partietexecuted ; but instead
the provision& of it lie put the d
tiff a smelt part of the 2,e
walked off iitli her to the shi

gaged Mb berths. and ;I:poiea
with his enchanting daughte-
considered there might, be a r
of sada, of., because the bill
Barbadoes who has slat been
L. Belgrare; and the fatter..'
bility, he really and only wisp
all claims under his execut

daughter to the West Indian ,
he would make a better thing o.
clear that this gentleman imuld
ing piny to the plaintiff to the,,„
the bill only prayed that theieril ,
of 6001. and a fraction. The Wes
the Learned Counsel had advised
cation, but to obtain the writ to -- _
arid then w.
to use all diligence in amending his bill.
His LORDSHIP. washout hesitation, ordered the writ a( .ke
E.rtat Recto to issue, indorsed to the amount of the 8001. and is
fraction. •
JOINT STOCS COMPANIES.
VANSANDAU v. PETER SWORE, SUP., AND SlLTdfisitt-..
This was a inotiun of very considerable importince as a eehog
the multifarious Joint Stock Companies °on In eliiiikerte% ~,t
Mr. HEALD, for the plaintiff, stated the prayer or the bat tone
for an injunction to restrain the British Aonulty Cambany from
excluding him from the partnership, or from acting differehtle
from the prospectus of the Institution first issued for the &dam*
of the shareholders, and Upon the faith of which they had cap.
tinted to subscribe. The plaintiff was a solicitor, and the arfel-
dents were the Chairman Ansi beiretary of the Institution called 44
British Annuity Compant.
M r.littosiEs here stated, that he oppeared on the part Of the des
(talents, end that a, demurrer had Leen put in. Ile aphrettenticd
that a demurrer ought to take preeedeoce. The application ought,
at least for the present, to he postpohed.
The Loa D CHANCELLOR thought there could be no objeetieffil;
Mr. Heald's stating the facts of the case, in order that the Court
might understand the nature of it. The Counsel might afterwards
adopt what course best suited their convenience.
Mr. sttuDErr wished that time might be allowed before the aIL•
davits were read.
The LOU) CHAWCELLpi said, that upon a case of this impoft•
ant nature lie was anxious tit be put :n possession of the facts.
Mr. HEALD then proceeded to state the principal facts as th
appeared upon the bill. _ The Institution appeared to have bash
established for the purpose of lending money upon securities' tar
the purchase of life interests, reversions, government pensions, Res
The capital was to be 3,000,000/. with 80.000 shares, at 601. char ;
no individual was to possess more than 200 shares. The plaintiff
wrote fur fifty shares, and received a letter, declaripg hint to be?
subscriber for 40 shares, and directing him to pay 21. deposit upset
each share into the banking.house of Messrp. !Kaye, Price, and Co.
The letter inclosed also a prospectui of the company, declaring lie
objects of the partnership to be the reduction of the late of interest
upon loans on securities, and, the protection of Indisiduelafror
extortions of money agents. It is stated also, that in the yea'
1824, no fewer than 1,467 annuities had been vented, and that io
three years four minims of money had thus been invested. The
prospectus also, in the usual manner, declared the names of the
Chairman, the Deputy Chairman, the Directors,Secretary, &c. A'
Act of Parliament was afterwards obtained, authorising the forms•
tion of this Company ; but, the Learned Counsel admitted, not
declaring it to be a Corporate Body. Of this Company there were
about five hundred shareholders, and Of thee the present plaintiff*
Was one , • .
The LORD CHANCELLOR said, that one very important ques-
tion was, whether the Act of Parliament forming this Company
had capacitated any individual belonging to the Conipahy to sue
any members of that Company ?
Mr. SUGDEN thought that that question had teen complet4
decided In the case of the Globe Company.
The Loma CuasrcELLoa said, that it Seas clear that an indi-
vidual who was no member of the Company could sue that Com-
pany by the Chairman or Secretary. It was, however, ver•
different with respect to in individtial Who was a member of the
Company.
Alf. KNIGHT, who was junior Counsel with Mr. Heald, said.
that he hail certainly felt that difficulty in preparing the bill. There
was, he apprehended no alternative but that of introducing the
whole five hundred members as defendants on the record.
The Lone CHANCELLOR observed, that there was another
question equally important to be considered. Ile remarked that
there was a clause introduced into the Act of Perliament formiffic
this Company, that nothing in the Act should be considered as
giving to this Company a Corporate character. If the deed of cot-
! 'mutton upon which the Company acted. showed that it was &ear
as a Corporation, could any Court of Justice entertain any jurieldie.
tion with respect to such a Company ? That point had, he believed,
been determined I y the Judges in the Ccurt of King's Bench. •
Mr. HEALD reminded his Lordship of the case respecting the
New River Company as bearing upon this point.
The LORD CHANCELLOR well recollected that case- There
was another also, of a similar description, which related to a to-
bacco.box, and the Churchwardens of St. Margaret's, West.
tninster.
Mr. HEALD proceeded to state, that the plaintiff was Banes
quently called upon for a second instalment of 41. per share, era
Was Informed that a deed of settlement had been drawn up. whicya
every shareholder was required to sign. He was also made sic-
gummed with a wish generally expressed by the greater part of the
shareholders, that the whole of the 601. should be paid up. If.
therefore, the plaintiff chose to pay the whole 301. upon each Or
Lit forty shares, he might do it. and would receive aproportionale
interest for such advance; but if not desirous at paying the whelp
sum, 41. upon each share would be all that would be at ;meet!
required. The letter stating these circumstances was written by
Mr. Mitchell, the Secretary, and the plaintiff replied Ly protesting
against the payment of the whole sum of 601. upon each share
by which a manifest advantage would be given to the rich mgr
those who were not so competent to meet the demand. With re-
spect to the payment of the 4/., he said it should in dhe time meet
Ms attention. The plaintiff afterwards called at the office of the
Company, and saw the deed of settlement which had been prawn
up, and to which his signature had been required. Ile found it so
be an instrument wholly inconsistent with good faith, and in ditedt
violation of the rights of the shareholders, as declared by the pro-
spectus originally issued to the subscribers. By this deed of settle-
ment the Directors were appointed for life, with fixed Warier;
and all the officers of the Company were also appointed for lifi,
with fixed salaries. The deed also stipulated that every•pleare-
balder, previous to selling any of his shares, should give notice et
his intention to sell to the Directors, giving them a right of pre-
emption at the market price. The shareholders also who did not
execute this deed were totally excluded from receiving any bor.as
or dividend upon their shares.
Mr. Sr aDme, who preferred arguing the demurrer tow, rather
than postpone it to a later period, proceeded to stated the grounds
upon which it as. contended this bill could not be sustained. He
first addressed himself to the merits of the case, and observed, i
the object of the plaintiff, Mr. Vansandau, seemed to be tb put
stop to the proceedings of the whole Company, merely !»T+
thwl
they did not exactly meet his speculative views. The plaintiff, ;t
was evident, ntesnt to belong, not to areal substantial Joint Stoclt
' Company, but to be engaged in one of those bubble speeulatiO4
so detrimental in their nature. His object Wei tot to keep the
shares, but to sell them at the highest marketable price, and thus
delude the public. The plaintiff, the Learned Counsel Shp/mewl
was desirous of inereasieg his practice, and immediately,bekan Ms
practice upon the COM pany and the public. lie Hicti alitiat.4 ip
the salaries which hail Item appointed for the Director). and eua-
tended that it was a very useful as well as wholisionsepractioe.
The LORD CHANCILLCH had DO doubt but that.,the Directuts
were anxious to make a comfortable place for theartelves ; and kr
idaseribers to thestrompenies, they molts
persons chose to become a • .. —
take the consequence of their am. He apprehended that this c on.
pony could only be considered in the light et a partnership, ahli
must be so contemplated by the Court.. In this view, then, LI
asked, could the Court carry on a partnership, or make titles 114
regulations Pm it ?
Mr. Soanum thought no e!osCut could be eatertabied oil the
queence . He nest pmfasted to advert to the !summate of tit/
prospectus originally distributed to the substaibers, and remarlseil
upon the emeage which declared that the Directors should have
power to "tend the capital according to the deussoes of the public.
Tate passage, therefore, completely juuitted the course which
been adored by the Drreetors with respect to the payment at the
whole 1.01 upon each share.
The Lotto CM:tact LLOS hid no doubt that there were
If those Cd.',latiso v hic4 tat Mthly lista; so the public, :141acl

.3CUt .aavii.
.
AVEt v. BELOllallt.
r a wilt of Ne Kreat keno, under ti,e
•The plaintiff' is a young gentiemap Whit
o'2l years, a native of Rathadoes, seat
len about sit years old, for the purgo.e
t time ago the plaintiff's father died,
led to large estates, and appointingybe
e (who is uncle to the plaintiii), his tee-
plaintiff. The defendanthad never Aen-
acconnts to the plaiting', but lately he
greeably sorprised by the appearing( of
• country, who stated to the flaintiffslist
or three fold t in the Rest Pete., he "*
thousand pounds curreacy : in the vac
d to settle &tithe minority aceounts; and,
,ught with him. a young, beautifet. and
desirably adapt to make this young
iin existence, fir. J. Belgrare Isere-
o lose no time io coining tea settlmmant
riding this Vest Indian charmer to that
ion, which he might cad. halals.
us ithstanding be had himself ti.lfttlg af
on, paused awhile; but at lentrth:.
ndistitnenza of flip Dorothy Lydia-
ry her. A deed was then at trackpee.
I release on the part of the plaiaMta
ms on acdcunt of his etecutor or true
tame time a marriage settitnecj',..ll"l
rosining that the 2,eutia• eeeme eepr
f, and that. as, Ifiss D. L. 'Belga. is
i daughter of the. defendant, the det=
t his death the thirteenth or fou
lay then be in possession of. This drift
nstead of the defendant complying th
the deed into his pocket, pss3 the pie I,
!,0001.. took his daughter by the hactl,
ship Produce, on board of Which belt--
posed to set sail to-day or to-atomise,
rhter, to the Vest Indies. Mr. Pore
a very good reason not of eiding.cf, kut
bill alleged that there is a gentleman its
been proposed-as a husband for !lids ID.
ler Ageing obtained what, in all probe-
rished, namely, a general tele,* from
utor and trustee-ship, by carry/fit 1114
to market, he, perbspe. iee>idtred that
ng of her there rather tharkhere. It was
paid have to be yonsidered. he *doubt -
t 41mamount cf yo,poac, bvt Ly mist e
c Vrit illght be enOots4d to the hea t
le tare,
oaever,wail so pres.ing, at
idvised bus Clit`nt not to delay the ap 1-
it to the amount of Ifoo. Tor the Orterpt,
e in amending his bill. .

I`

makers which nese aptally detrimental; but if these Complain
take spun tam:mei/vs a Corporate character, let them be
t as might be, yet oat peat question was, how they were
remedies among themselves, it being a clear point
,art of Equity could manages rertneralim from time to
It was fir from has wish to throw emberrasements in the
the formation of any useful Society (and there were, he
of them), but persona engaging in them should take
remedies one squat another. fie recollected that
eice in Parliament with respect to these Co.npanies
_ to mention the names of the parties is the preamble
Bill, bat that wholesotoe practice had been since departed
observed, that the plaintiff bad objected to the
the Directors, only because it had deprived him
-est his shares. Although in his letter he had
at of the second instalment should in due
a. yet that instalment had never been raid.
also possessed 13.5 of these shares, and had
el the agreement. It was the plaintiff
the remainirg 490 share-holders, and
tie to let all those evils have their full play
ible Act of Geo. I. had been solely levelled
• adverted to the legal objections to the
Ally two ; first, to the parties; secondl ,
. n respect to the first point, he
this Company was formed gave me wear se
another individually ; and, as to the stoned, be
. in the case of a partnership (which this Damps"
considered to be) the Court had no juradiedea
's dissolution.
t.eoit observed, thee it vas new a seeded
aid not nits jEtillit Jade keg
; so Wan IMO
Company ; but be would orbits fair
.o say it would compel the continuation a
even for a single week ?
et alluded to the sale of the shares by chit rlst%
When that, notwithstanding the sale, be
the debts of the Company.
«Irene-Loa doubted much whethet the plaintiff
compel the Directees to approve of the persons
' his ;hares.
ad at considerable length vilest the de-
it expressing his surprise at the line of
Learned Friend. It was, he. observed,
ad enrainens, and esisted wholly in the
Lamed Friend, for it had no foundation in
to his lot to consider, in various consultations,
A might arise in engaging in, and prosecuting
and he had startled many by suggesting the pos.
which they might be surrounded. litany had been
he told them that if any of them should happen
possible event), all the money outstanding, lent or
would be involved as well as their personal represen.
case any calls Ow:told be made upon them. On We
the cu e of Devaynes v. Nolice was peculiarly in
.sepeet to the present plaintiff, be apprehended that tat:
manifai power on his part to file a bill praying the dissolu-
the partnership.
,e Lord CHANCELLOR said, that a Court of Equity would
ase curry into execution articles of partnership, unless a specific
tune for the continuance of that partnership was stated. Where a
putter might the oext day put an end to the partnership, no suck
or could be made. Lordship, upon looking over the
prospectus, observed that the Directors were to act only by the
authority of the Legislature. No such authority had, however,
been given. He apprehended it must be shewe in the Bill how
that authority had been dispersed with, and how it was to be
considered a legal Company notwithstanding. With respect to
the deed of settlement, he must take it for granted that it was en.
trolled. He must see the whole contents of that deed of settlement;
for supposing it to turn out that that deed contained provisions
bringing the body within the eth Ge 0.1., how could the Court in-
terfere ?
Mr. HEALD considered that there were many ways of putting
a case in which the Court could interfere, even in the event that
'the Company fell within the provision of the Bubble Act. For
Maumee, supposing a Company to be within that Act, if fair pro-
posals were held out to the public, would the Court say, " you
uught to have known that it was within the Bubble Act, and you
can have no relief."
The LORD CHANCELLOR could not go that length. If. how.
ever, the public embarked in any concern that was decidedly illegal,
We Court undoubtedly could give r.o relief.
Mr. liitALD observed, that cases might be put in which a bill
might be filed, where a receiver would be appointed, although
the Company might not be decidedly legal. The Court upon
'Maine only could not decide upon the legality of a Company.
Supposing In such a case the Court got the money into its hands,
it would never impound it, and yet to whom was it to be delivered ?
The Court would not give it to any of the members of the Bubble
Company.
The LORD CHANCELLOR said, that Parliament had always
taken care that judgment should be had against every individual
member of the Company, as against the Chairman or Secretary.
It was, indeed, highly important that every individual should have
easy mans of suing a Company. Prisons so subscribing, like
others, must die some day or other ; and this Court had determined
that it would net permit the Accountant-General to have any thing
to do with these Companies, and the consequence had been, that
the Coin could not say it would take this property under its pro.
tect,on. It was, indeed, to hint most astonishing that people
should engage in these concerns, being wholly ignorant of the con.
sequences attending these steps. Whatever people might think, it
was. at lent, no unkindness on his part to let them know that these
difficulties really did exist. With respect to the liability of the
plaintiff, the Act of Parliament would make him liable, whether
the deed of settlement did so or not. It was, however, true that
the deed might nuke him liable for that which, perhaps, was not
adverted to in art Act of Parliament. Another important considera-
tion was, that if this was a partnership agreed upon to continue for
a certain time, it was well ; but if it was a common partnership,
the death cf one rsrtner would put an end to the whole cor.cern.
The prospectus did not say a single syllible about a deed of settle-
ment. Was this, then, any more than a partnership silently agree-
eng to an with filth towards each other ? The question was,
whether it was not dissolvable at a moment's notice ?
Mr. HEALD said he should propose to his client to file a bill
for that very_purpcser that would effectually put an end to the
safety of the Directors, and he for one should not be sorry for such
a result.

The LORD CHANCELLOR—Another point wee (for difficulties
arose every :roman u to the capital) could the Court interfere
where the capital was unpaid ? Here was a capital of 300 millions
marling—
Mr. Snots' corrected his Lordship; it was but thtee millions.
The LORD CHANCELLOR smiled, and said it was all the same
in the end whether it was three millions or three hundred millions,
as far as payment went.
Mr. Stones said that the capi.al had been subscribed, not
paid.
The LORD CHANCELLOR said, that in ordinary partnerships a
into might dissolve a partnership, but he could not sell his share.
Me ,:shed to know what answer Mr. Heald could make to tht
objection that the Act did not autbotise one member to sue au•
other ?
Mr. HEALD was prepared to contend, lint, that the Act did au-
thorise a member to sue ; and secondly, if be tailed on that ground,
that general policy and principle allowed it.
The bouts CHANCELLOR observed, that the manifest intention
of the Legislature was to prevent one member of a Company suing
another. The remedy given by the Legislature was against this
Chairman, or Secretary the doubted whether both could be sued at
the same time), and if judgment was obtained against either of
them, the partfmight take out execution against any member of
the Company. • The party, however, so suing, could bring only
one action. With regard to a member of the Company, the ease
was different, for he could not sue any of his partners; the policy
of the Legislature being this—that if members might be allowed to
bring actions against one another, there could be no end of litiga-
tion, for the actions could not be limited. His Lordship, in con-
clusion, said, that it was of the last importance to the public that
the doctrines laid down should be clearly undemood, for the pur-
pose of preventing many unnecessary suits, ruinous in the extreme
so all parties engaged.
The argument* of Mr. Inttour, on the same side with Mr.
HCILD, were postponed until Wednesday. His Lordship begged
to be furnished with those eases intended to be cited by the Learned
fientletncn, in order that be might be the better prepared to meet
the case when the arguments were eoncluded.—The Court imme.
diately rose.

adapt tale spots theinselies a
asoadliai as might be, yet ow i
maillservide for readies among
dist so Court of Equity could
illilwil, It WRI far from his wi!
way of the furmstion of any u
- law, any of them), but pen
tare to have remedies one sip'
the old practice in PBTIIMOSIER
VOA to be to mention the ran
of the Bill, but that ',holm'
4S•sa.
Mr. ezetimx observed, thai
• ecarse adopted by the Director
, power cf selling his shar
meet that the payment of th
his attention. yet th
plaintiff's
father also pose
:-,-leithout any difficulty signed tl
at• stood out alone against the
object seemed to be to le
which the Bubble Act a
Learned Counsel next adr
and they were principally
• jurisdiction. With reap
a Act by which this Con
amber tonne another indi
Illaittiined that in the case of 1
midi only be considered to In
Mr
sevellutofod itaudcissorLlLuotivont,
, void that a parmanhip could
; ewe origany sontemplated ;
Li
a'be Alliance
ce Company ;
of the Court to say It we
* even for a single
Me. Sainte alluded to the
his
llhe
le tnion
tlie debts
Lib Clll/111C11LIOR
its a bill to compel the l
to *lllOl be might sell his altar
lb. BiALD WM heard at
Ikea, mud commenced by ex
swim powsued by his Lear
nos at completely ad he
of his Learned Fr
It had fallen to his lot ti
01141MIkalties which might aril
=I4OIIOIKIIIO ; and he had
nil
damson by which they ii
ritvery, wbenposhjbtloeldvtehnernt
,t
would be involved,
" . In INS soy calls shun
the MS of Devarne
reepost to the present pl
• Van • matfett power on his pa
IMILof the partnership.
Lord CIIIIRCELLOR 11l
Pal