Northern Times.
Liverpool, Merseyside, England, 1859-10-07 00:00:00

Flt-ONt 11.11Y1

2. .at 10 0 air

to owing
GRANTED on approved security (and on
the shortest notice), in sums from £5 to £1,600 at the
to ow.ng charges :

Entire Charge
including Form of Application
£0 12 6
19 1 4' 0
~ 218 6
403. „ 5 15 0
80s. „
And upwards in the same proportion.
Advances can be obtained, to be repaid by other instalments
than weekly, and for fixed and longer periods.
LOANS WITHOUT SURETIES.
•

£lO, repayable at ss. per wee
£2O,
£5O,
£lOO,
£2OO,

Arrangements are now completed for Lending on the secu-
rity of Deeds, Corporation or Dock Bonds, Shares in Building
Societies, Railway, or other Public Companies, and upon any
other class of security that is at all times available. The
charges in cases where special security is given will be
reduced considerably, and the repayment can be made either
• -,,,,, sum at a fixed period, or by instalments as may be

Agroeci upon
_ DISCOUNT DEPARTMENT.
Tradesmen and others not having access to .11 Bank, can
have their Bills Discounted promptly, and.on very model ato
terns.

Parties residing' in the country can
paving reasonaide extra charge for tray
For prospectuses, and other informatii
CHRIS. E
JOHN EL

be accommedated on
'ening expenses.

Lon,-apply as above to
:LLISON, Manager.
,LISON, Secretary.

UNDER HER MAJESTY'S SEAL OF REGISTRATION

H. ELLIS'S UNIVERSAL WASHING
MACHINE AND CHURN,

IS the simplest invention ever introduced to the Public. It is
fio more liable to derangement, and occupies little mere room
than an ordinary Wash-tub. It does no ir.jury to the most de-
licate fabrics and effectually washes every description of clothes.
With its aid a person can do as -much work in three hours
as in a whole day without it, six or sev' snirts being well
washed in eight or ten minutes. It supplies a want long felt,
especially by small families, owing to its great cheapness,
portability,, and requiring so little room. These advantages,
combined with its perfect simplicity and efficiency, will render
it a really desirable and useful article in p.-o,

Thislieachine is admirably adapted for a Churn. It possesses
an agitating action peculiarly favourable to the formation of
Butter, : and, • on this account, will perform the process of
churning considerably quicker than most Churns new in use.
Its simple construction, ease of working, and cheapness, are
also grounds of especial and strong recommendation
N.8.--:Althoff

tweeirt t,

there is no difference in the Machines, be-
o be used for Churning and those for Washing,
erpectgd, on the score of cleanliness, bhat the
iL will be used for both purposes.
r 1 Ns FOR USING ARE ATTACHFD TO RACII /LACHINE.
T -R Y 'l' . • • -
SIZES AND PRICES, &c.

♦SII PDX' SIIITABLE TO CHURN

L. s. d
2 0 0
22 10 0

33 0 0
.1 310 0

From 2to 3 Persons. From.lo to 20 lbs.
„ 4to 6 ditto. „- 20 to 30 lbs.
„ 7to 9 ditto. „ 30 to 40 lbs.
„ 12 and upwards. „ 40 and upwards

TOXTETH-PARK BOARD or GV,A_RDIA3TS.

The weekly meetinglof-this board eras--held yes-
terday in the board=room of the Tublie-oilices, Park-
road, Mr.. 711:4:--Alpass; presiding. There were also
presentessrs. M. A. Johns; W. Baynes, J. Wilsoii,
.1. Harrison, G. \V.. Hunter, John Wilson, H.-tavland,
Win. Leyland, J. D. .Carter, John Moss, and-J. B.

•
Ttie Report of the Governor of the West Derby Work-
ouse showed that there were is that estab!ishment be 7 onging to the district of the Park last "week, 3.47 ; this
.eek, 354 k against 352 in the corresponding week of
Ot this number, there were sick 'and in th

last year.
hospital, last week, thirty-one
discharged, seven ; died, three; this week, thirtt.
A cheque for the relief of out-door paupers to the
amount-of £92 was granted.
Letters were read from Mr. J. Finnigan and. Mr. W.
E. Smith, district medical officers, in
which they stated
that, when they were appointed medical officers, they
were led to believe by the advertisement that the vac-
cination fees would amount to about £B2 annually each
officer. During the six months that they had been
appointed, the receipts of Mr. Finnigan had been £l6,
and those of Mr. Smith amounted to about £2O, being
less than half what they expected. They had been in-
formed by their predeCessors that the receipts during the
winter months, would be merely nominal, and, at most,
the amount would not exceed £lO. They,. therefore,
asked that* the board should increase their salaries.
Mr. HARRISON asked if the board had not convro-
mised itself in stating the sum ?
The CHAIRMAN said they had only stated the aunt
received by their predecessors.
Mr. CLEAVER said there was nothing legally binding
in that.

admitted iinee, nim

Mr. IlAnnisoxsaid, as the candidates for the vacan-
cies had been led to suppose that the vaccination receipts
amounted to £lB4 jointly, it wasmorally binding, though
probably not.legally.
Mr. Moss observed that he agreed with Mr. Harrison,
that the board had, in some measure, been compromised
by stating in the advertisement that the vaccination fees
amounted to £164. It was, no doubt, a basis on which
those gentlemen had made their calculations as to the'
amount of their income. He had no doubt that the
falling off was to be attributed, in a great measure, to
the
private practice of the .former medical officers, and
who now,' in their priVate practice, vaccinated children
in the usual way; whereai; if they had continued as
medical officers to the boardz they would have bad the
privilege of charging for vaccination. He thought the
medical officers had an equitable claim on the board for
some increase of salary. They had been very attentive;
and hadgiven every satisfaction to the board, and to the
imblie generally ; and, considering the whole eiFOUM-
stances, he-tiould-glie notice that, at the next meeting
of the board, he should .move that the salaries of the
medical officers be advanced. He was not, however,
prepared to' mention to what amount.
The CILURMAN said he would read to them a letter
which had been addressed to Mr. Cleaver from Messrs.
Houghton and-Smith, enclosing one from Messrs. Kilpin
and Montgomery, dated the 24th of August. The en-
closed letter was : "Please to pay Messrs.' 'Houghton
and Smith £l,OOO, and deduct the same from the pro-
ceeds of the next cheque we are, and shall be entitled
to receive from your next hoard. The receipt of Messrs.
Houghton and Smith will be sufficient." In answer to
that, Mr. Cleaver had sent a letter to Messrs. Houghton
and Smith, stating :that, so soon as the cheque was
granted he would apprize them of it.
Mr. CLEAVER stated, in answer to the chairman, that
no cheque had been granted since that date.
Mr. Moss said it was rather a serious affair. It wax
the first time he had heard of it. He .thought the
Building Committee, or Mr. Cleaver, were to blame,
that the board had not been made acquainted with it
before.' If he had been aware that such an order- had
been given by Kilpin and Montgothery, he.
,would _have
refused to countenance such a proceeding. It was tan-
tamount to giving a 'preference to creditors.' Mr.
CleaVer's letter was perfectly guarded, -and had placed
the board in a condition of perfect safety; still he
thought they should have been made acquainted with
the matter. When the money was due the board
would pay it. He thought the creditors. would look
upon it with an amount of displeasure. In his opinion,
such a. proceeding was fraught with an amount of dan-
ger, to attempt to° enter into an underhand and secret -
arrangement- with a public board.
Mr. HARRISON said, as chairman of the 'Building
Committee, he had to say that he was not aware "that
any such document was in existence.
Mr. CLEAVER remarked that, when ho received'the
p
letter he answered, so as to + a board and
010 not acquaint the --board of the matter, because he
could not see what action could bo taken upon it.
The CHAIRMAN said it was his duty to acquaint the
board with the fact, as the letter was addressed -to him
as their clerk.
The matter then dropped.
Mr. JOHNS withdrew the motion of which he had
given notice last week, in consequence of a gentleman
not coming forward whom he had expected to attend.
Mr. Moss thought the conduct of their officer was
highly disrespectful, to write- letters to the newspapers
reflecting on the dignity of the board. If he had,any
complaints to make, he 'should make them to the Poor-
law Board, and not resort to such measures.
This was all the business before the board.