Northern Times.
Liverpool, Merseyside, England, 1859-07-20 00:00:00

Mr. COWPER contended that the objection to the bill
The bill

arose from an entire misapprehension of the case.
provided means whereby knowledge of the subjec
brought to bear upon the public health : 10,0 i

I might be

y whose lives niig

it be preserved b

caution

Sir S. ESTCOURT, while admitting the advanta
measure, thought that it would be best if it wer
from year to year. What was wanted was a gei
sion_of all acts affecting the public health.

es of the

'e renewed

feral revi-

Mr. E. JAMES like4wis,
Public Health Act.
Mr. V. FARQUHAR took
Mr. CAYLEY was in fave

;0 objected to perpet

iating the

a similar view.
)ur of a permanent me,
a Mr. CONYNGRAM,
le divided, when the se
95. The bill then pas

After some remarks frorr
from Mr. LOWE, the Irous4
ing was carried by 101 to

nd a reply
eond read-

MUNICIPAL

'ORPORATION BILL

cipal Corporation Bill was
who contended that the I
sufficient information to di
it ought to be referred to a
amendment to that effect.
Mr. M. Smim and Mr.

resumed by Mr. S.

'louse . was not in po:
[vide upon the measure
select committee ; am

moved an

Mr. HENLEY had not
justify the passing of the 1

heard auy g
ill.

The sitting

THE FOREIGN SECRETARY

In reply to Mr. S. Fitzg
Lord J. RUSSELL said a

consider whether he shoul

respondence at the same ti

Mr. BUXTON called att(
which the Commission a
Army which referred to ,ti
in future. The report involved. the mainten
of 400,000 men in India, and in the presen
of the Indian finance. He adverted to the
ing 300,000 natives, and demanded that grea
be exercised on the subject.

;ntion to that poiti,
a the organisation

Lord. STINT.EY sairthat the amount of

recommended irrespective of the financial
Whatever force was employed.. might be
the occasion which required them had pas
was true that, at the date ,of the last accc
bative force was great than it had dvs

this was due altogether to

not possible to lair down any rule as to the ar
which would be required for the defence of t
Sir C. PEVERIL said that the report was
' and did not touch the real difficultie4

factory

by conciliation, and not by force. ,
Mr. SmoLLErr protested against raising difficulties; pro-
.

selytising the treaties, and adnexin

the territories

Mr.- Kinnaird, Mr. Hadfield, and Mr.,Vansittart, mad(
some remarks upon the subject, after which

question exceeded that either of ih
Budget. He pressed its eonsideratior,
India. .

ortance of the Indian
ie Reform or of the
a on the Secretary for

the financial state of India before the
moment, and hoped that this accou
would, on Thursday next, be placed on

House at the
nt for that

earliest

purpose

a the table

PARLIAMENTARY SESf
Mr. C. FOSTER moved that a humbl,
to Her Majesty, representing the ince.]
ing the session of Parliament during
and praying that her Majesty would be

le address be p

Ivenience of

the summer

graciously pl
!e by assembli

months,
used to
ag Par-

propose a remedy fo
liament for 'the desp
urged the Govermie
sion, wheh they had

he inconvenienc

nt to take it into
. concluded their fi
seconded tl
hould termii
aid that th

!onsideratio
['uncial bus

as. tie
this ses-

Mr. W. DWART I
legislative debates sl

mo

Mr.
the la
not tc
chang,
was tt

. BENrINCK
,rig speeches of
ouch. It was
o tl4 house fr(
he system whiel

nate in
.e real
ers, wl
ble by
ns to

the memo

h this me

not possik
in politicia:

any such

was in flit

'hey had tr

Ind any 1

Mr.
be gre
and th
A ftE

A. SMITH thOI
atly facilitated

flit tiiiit tY

if
_they p:

done in the
k of -Parham
ed early in
id upon the
Colonel Fr

Le estim
obser

ates wE

isted in
Pn could

anuary,