Northern Times.
Liverpool, Merseyside, England, 1859-07-22 00:00:00

JULY 22, 1859.

aifesto from the Emperor of the French had no own by reducing her armaments. -Let the present Ministry
effect either here or at Paris.
_l_ 1_ prove in this way their boasted influence with France, and
• .1 l• _ 1-IAI falfllin nrize between their
.statesnand provinces. Let

nen uncts have a
belief that, should

;am aeennea. many people r---
;omething more tangible than this terminate the disgracefa
requisite to restore confidence, and prove, by reducing army
irniceded. policy ; and then the Chan
:s the tendency was rather look without apprehension
he might have some hope 01
The CHANCELLOR of tip
the liberal support of Mr. I
the budget, defended his pr
tion of the increased incon
ticability against levying tl
The head of our financia

expepc

acellor of the- Exchequer

at the state of the financ

,s, and

f extraction of the income

decidedly in favour

e EXCIIEQIIER, after allitd
Disraeli and the general tc
7oposition in respect to the
ie-tax. He denied tbe ii
ie tax in the manner pre
1 debt had declared that

1 demand was experienced,
before 21 per cent. The
)ney has been at its lowest
ux of told from the Bank

ihe

raters consequently are ask-
Intrshr current.

pplies a further sum of
withdrawn from the Bank
P--

income, as to tax the '96:

:less in payment for

of throiving the tax upon

1 right to tax
. The modificatic

part of its proceeds

whole year R•o

m out contracts for a

Which could only be fine(

iext yea

f the to:

bii:-be sent out this mail

Government

Mi. Disraeli had treated tl
summarily.' Up to 1853
prevailed which had been
expenditure had been haste
continued for .a few years,
s I country into utter confusion

lish funds remain with-

)AY EVENIN

It, but the tendanc

Cowards weakness.

dative Chamber

.ed unfavourably, from

throw the

trope who

his reverses

tions, t

e faith .of Italy, On those

cannot have been con-

giving a new

ance and increasing' hex

,
country that the civil cxp
with its wants. He dema
spirit of eeonomy which pr(
Reform Bill to the comm
Great as is our civil expel
unress it was strongly handl
for Harbours Of Refuge, I

otlier contracts,

borrowing

ast night on leave, ain

total wreck, the loss to

market yesterday as cx-

a pirit of public

ally in heavy stocks;

yesterday, on the sub-

taxed since, and
d to with a facil
mild throw the fir

RIAL PARLIAMENT.

ITISH AND

GNETICTELEGRAFIL]

liture was only i

YESTERDAY

of the Civil Service estimates.
question, he admitted the

is Bill. He adverted to the evils arising from
adicial power in the new Court of Probate and
explained the means whereby his bill proposed
evil. This lay principally in making all the
Superior Courts available for the Divorce Court.
tranAm and CRANWORTH supported the bill.
.msronn opposed the bill, on the ground that

d, therefore, a
iled frOm the pl
ement of the I

f the Superior Courts were already amply

it would be

alit Offices, till

ISDALE and the Earl of
s of the Divorce Cour

ICKLOW urge(

sholild be extended to

not therefore s'

arther discussion, the bill was read a second

PUBLIC HEALTH
,c Health Bill was read aBILL. second tint

H E
RAILBOURS OF MALTA

SET, in reply to the Earlof Caernarvon,
the harbours

Were iu pr(

gress for improving

In reterence t

with which Lord MalmesbUry had roana
affairs. His silence on the subject being inte:
an approval of his entire policy the moment an

en adjourned at 7.40

tion of Air. Disraeli against Congresses was rath(
ing, in the face of the endeavours made by the
merit, a few mouths ago, to establish a Cong,t
means in their power. As to the peace he
judgment, adverting to several of the points
Mr. Disraeli.

Mr. BRIGHT declared the income-tax to lx

„
was in the nature of a property which was ma
applied, of which he gave many striking examp
consistent, he asked, with their persbnal honor

he country, to al

property. 'He considered it most unjust in
On . the same grounds he objeCted to ' the
,tributipn of the income-tax. Referring to our
he contrasted that' of 1853 with that of
year, when. the latter exceeded the former by i
Were.we more safe at present than, in 1853' f

journals upon the Emperor of the 'Wench, -a
that if those attacks w( " - -

continued for a few nu

France, and'renew the terrible and bootless stri
revolutionary war. He did not believe that
would willingly undertake a war against this
richest, the most powerful; and the most sat
world. Looking to the, tremendous power
engines
.of destruction, war became impossibl
break down by its weight. He called upon
to set others the great example of dimini

half
on pr
)uld tl
leave

.conorr
demar
ity wb

it Was

year's

-oposed
prow a

to the
of the
a war.

armaments. France had great armaments for
same object as that professed by ourselves, viz.
with greater force. He was convinced that botl
Emperor and the French people were most anxious to Main-
tain friendly relations with this country, and were astounded
at the tone taken by certain statesmen in this country. Let
us offer to France the abolition of the wine duties in return
for .changes in the :French tariff; let us the-same time
propose a mutual reduction of armaments. Honestly and
fairly proposed, he believed
.that a state of things wguld
be brought about such as history could not parallel.'
(Hear, hear.) There was, he believed, no man more
able to effect this great object than. the present Prime
Minister of (England, who would thus retrieve the position

to negotiate
i the French

and relieve thelabolirs of millions of men now doomed to
the grave.

Conn ,J. RUSSELL concurred in most of the sentiments
just expressed, and reprobated the aspersions cast upon the
'Emperor of the French, which could only create a .
ciprocal animosity against ourselves. He believed that, bad
as were wars of ambition, wars of passions were worse
with regard to the maintenance 'of armaments, he believed
it was necessary to keep , our military and naval establish-
ments on a footing compatible with the progress of acience—
the wealth and importance of the country.
__ • _

LOrd PALMERSTON said that it had beeil too readily asserted
that he approved of the foreign policy of the late Govern-
ment. He had expressed 'no such approval he had only