Northern Times.
Liverpool, Merseyside, England, 1859-04-11 00:00:00

COURT OF PASSAGn.---SAruntirr
•
BEFORE EDWARD JAMES, ESQ., ASSESSOR.
F REACH or CONTRACT.—PROEDLF.Y V. MEDCALI _
plaintiff in this case James Prondlev, car proprietor in
Everton, and the defendant, . John Medenlf, is a cow keeper
in the same neighbourhood. Mr. ASpinall appeared for the
plaintiff, and Mr. Brett for the defendant It appeared that
some time ago the plaintiff had a field to let, and let it to
the defendant for six months, from the Ist May to the Ist
defendant

0, to I),

November, for
took possession of the field, and paid thr(

les rent

monthly, and then gave it up 6n the pretence of a deficiency
The plaintiff hew ever alleged that the cow:
id th(

in the fences

were not watered

oke Ore

s to foot

Mr. Brett proceeded to

Onwri.
IC' £lO

plaintit

ACTION FOR F/LLSE IIdFLISONMENT

The plaintiff

Wilson, Iv
1 cha (-lac

the cook and steward of

dant is the captain of the same vessel
appeared for the plaititiX and Mr. TeL
It appeared that the plaintiff shipped on warn
in October last, for a voyage to Op

plc for theilerendant
Fraud

to Live
the ear

on the
or his

ive him

f him f

LI he ha

stolen
made fa
took orcl
him before the magistrates, who ma
dant to bay the money. Defendant delayed p
and theplaintiff-summoned him again befor(
but the defendant charged the plaintiff ti

summons as

iinst f

de an on

lemon(

sonic canvass,

him into ensto,

)la.intiff

was accordingly brought before Mr. Malik
charge, and after st remand for one day 1
the witnesses on the part - -
an.a.iust him on the second da

The plaintiff in his examt-

corroborated the above

there IT

elon 1

Its own

not put

yours into the
Witness : • "No
and mei.
apprenti

learned Assessor

3 That is exchange
) Jdhn Gurd, an
change the birds,

xi he saw the Oaintiff

and tut

)ff the captain'

and that the plaintiff showed him a pi
he said he ',Pot out of the cabin, and c

.ioned him not to

say anything about it
To the learned A
Tuesday orl

essor : I did tell. I did not tell till
fay last. Another witness was called
,ted that I

for the wdefondant, who

one of the captain's birds and p
his own. He did not tell the
arrived at Liverpool, because he was a

captain t

by the offteerg, On the voyage. _
for the plaintiff for £25 and the usual

jury returned a verdi

AND WIFE V. DAVIE& -

ACTION ilErfat DAMAGES.— r u
in this case-the plaintiff, Peter Foy, is a carter, and the
declaration ,stated that the defendant's servant negligently
drove a car and horse, on the '7th November last, and
knocked down the plaintiff's wife,-and inflicted serious injury
The defendant, Richard Davies, is a car-owner. Mr

?en-wiCk

appeareu tor Luc putiutru, ILILU var. V1.11,41V ay iv tir,
Mrs. Fay was proceeding, on the evening in, question, at
about five O'clock, along the crossing from Haymarket to
Whitechapel, when the defendant's car, w'
two horses, and going along from St. John' s-
chcster-strect, when the shaft of the car

-hick was drawn by

p,rn Man-
e shoulder

her. A witness was examined, who stated•that he saw the cab
coming alocg, and he shouted to the driver several times, but

he did not.ptill up.

)d way across the

[erect tu

woman of

lie medical evi

nee went to show

arm of the woman was still in a b

get well fo

that it was pro

rom the age o
yfher arm

woman,-,she would never recover the:proper u
The driver'being examined, said, that the woman ran so
swift that he had not time to pull up

lie was only

at the ordinary, trot pace

ACTION FOR • IMPRISONMENT,