Northern Times.
Liverpool, Merseyside, England, 1859-06-22 00:00:00

his wife.

appeared that the
and on IV -

wanted to to

when be st

a smart, but, fortunately, not dangerous wound,
sent to jail for six months with hard labour
A foreigner, named Niles Tykeson,
"duffer," about the docks, was charged for ha,
-lion of a gold watch that had be-en stolen from
Zellon, the master of a. Belgian ship. The watch wa
stolen out of the cabin of the ship, on the 29th April, and
-the prisoner was stopped offering it for pledge, on Monday
He could not give any account of it, and he was sent to j'
for two months. The watch was restored to the owner
mEssas. T. DOLTON AND L. PEEL.
MEA ^.—Elizabeth Spencer,
•1? -1. for exposing 621b_ of

He iva

whO acts as a

BEFORE MRS

172muoL Es 03

was SUM-

moped by

The defendant was

veal for sale, or

lOs and c

John Gibbons

vas summoned

and fined in a lik

same (

offence.—Joieph Connor, butcher, Northumberland-street,
was summoned by Inspector Lloyd, for exposing 611bs, of
beef, on the•l4th inst. The .defendant was fined lOs and
costs.—Julia Levy, Warwick-street, was summoned for
exposing a portion of two carcases of unwholesome beef.
Fined 103 and -

Is Hay, fishmon
treet, was summoned by Inspector Tyrrel'

Renshaw

!, and was film

la and C,

for expoiing Gibs of tirtwhOlesome lobsters

for sale

DETENTION or Goons.---Samuel Coleman, summoned Asa
floodwin, for detaining a quantity of his furniture. Mr. Dag-
gers appeared for the complainant, and Mr. Cobb for the
defendant. The complainant stated that he had taken

_ shed apartments from the defendant, and had
occupied them for about three months. At the end of
which time he expressed.a wish to leave. Upon that, the
defendant furnished °him with a bill of £4 3s. 4d., with a
notice to q.nit. He, the complainant, had paid all the rent
due, and he did not owe the defendant the amount claimed,
and congequently refused to pay, and the defendant detained
his goods for this reason. The defendent stated that the
complainant gave him liberty .verbally to detain his goods if
the amount now claimed was not paid by a man named
Smith, for work done,this person Smith being a friend of
uflicicntto'
lia',,,ers contended, that verbal
cons
titute a lienn on the goods,
Partuun-nt which enacted in ail

-unfurr

the con2plat

athority was not

and quoted f

'eh' cases written authority „nisi
be
no given. The
on the
eJ decided that there was

magistrat

otherd sailet4;,
WAGES CASE.—Henry Cook with four
Advance, for
summoned 'Jas. Alex. Duguid, captain of the A
Mr. Cobb
the
the sant of £9 6s 4d, a balance of Wages.
,ppeared for the complainants, and Mr. Sinipson for
The sailors complained that they had
from London to New Orleans, and't',-11,,e!t
instead v• _ .w Orleans the ship sailed to 'Mobile-
When they arrived at that port, they asked leave to see the.
consul, and refused to work until they did see him,, and
complained that they had been taken to Mobile instead of
New Orleans. The captain, Instead of allowing the men to
go before the consul to make their complaint, or to any
other authority, had the men put in prison in Mobile, where
they remained for seven weeks without being brought before
any authority, and then taken . s board the sinp, still
prisoners. When about thirteen days in prison, the
• captain ordered- them to get nothing but bread and•water,
and w!ien they were brought on board he kept them
s till prisoners, ,and gave them Itogiing, to gst or drink for

aefendant
articli

a voyagc

1 going. Co N