Northern Times.
Liverpool, Merseyside, England, 1859-06-06 00:00:00

ay. mere is no entry on the
'1 to Copeland, nor did Pam,

Mitchell was under Parry
I the-identity of the iron found IT

ye me any money thai:JdaN

The warm

by the police and .other
officers were re-called and said, Mitchell, in
ce, denied knowing him, and said he:never
Several other cases were proved of a like
icription, and the prisoners-were sent for trial. The case
gainst Jones -and Roberts, the wheelwrights, who were
barged with 'having received the iron, was then gone into,
rid the evidence against them was the same as given on
7hursday laSt,,and published in our naner of Frifinv Th.

preeen

tw him bef

L out four fOur hours, -in consequence of the cross-
es-and the speeches of the learned
The prisoners were committed for
, but on the application of Mr. Cobb, his Worship
)ed to take two sureties in £lOO each for their

,tnination of

uttemen, at 6

ppearance

BEFORE of

R.S. 'g.

.ND T. D. Al

IT T, T., '- -•-c .1 .“1, • --inargaret
unimoned awoman.nained Mary Moore, for having illegally
etained certain property, wearing apparel and other things,
0. the value of .over £lO. Mr. Gluck was for the
-_• , •

laughter, of Mother Eve
Id-like lo

remarkably black hair,
optics, and pearly dents. The
indant was 'a .regular giantess, twenty stone weight at
ist,lVith a face that would shame a full moon—although
at the tallestwomanin Liverpool, she is the largest and
leaViest in the good old town, and 'yet her body,. without
any crinoline; would !have formed:a-race course for juveniles
to run - round. The -complainant stated that she lodged
severaNdmes, on and.off. with' the 'giantess Moore, and paid
her 1.5.8. a-week, besides other perquisites; she left, a short
time since, after paying,•as she swore, the uttermost farthing,
and demanded her ditas —which meant gowns, and divers
materials appropriate • for ladies. Oh, yes,

when you

says Mrs. Giantess Moore,
£26 14s 1.02 d —the threefarthings bein
the balance of _a soda water

pay me
particular item in

Miss St. Lede
iemurred 4o the claimaarticularlyAction. to the three farthings,
,nd alleged that corgi/ gentlemen, whose names shall
Lereafter appear, had more than reimbursed the aforesaid
boore, by giving her £26 aO 11d, being a farthing more
[lan the 'dresses and other things were-wortil, or came to.
The rejoinder to'this plea was that the large lady, Moore,
had paid certain and several 'medical doctors, surgeons of
physic, apothecaries and chemists, sums of mosey, varying
from tenpence to three times that amount, on account of the
fair St. Ledger, -and until these sums,logetherAtith the cost
of some crinoline .and silk velvet capes,- were•recouped, the
clothes now sought to be recovered were retained. The
complainant swore,she did not osve-thelig woman a farthing
piece, but the defendant had procured-a woman (now in the
box with her) who iv,-as a first rate accountant, and-who, for
a bribe from Moore, ihad made out an account against her
(St. Ledger) without giving hertredit. Mr. .Bluek then
proceeded to cross-exaraine the complainant 'from a 15rll that
Xe held in his hand. Do you admit one crinoline'? Yer.
4-nd a pair of cuffs, ssadmit a pair of gloves,
a
3z 6d, and £3 15s for vel Yvet cloak, and £5 -16 s for brocade dreg., and 26s for a bonnet, and 13s for a pair of
hoots. I admit all these, but she is over paid for them.
Do you admit this item ler a doctor ? Yes, I admit that
for a,. doctor (loud laughter) ;_ large. fee that
!•ohably it was as mnch as he deserved.
was thes handed up to Mr Hol
nitted by tine defendant that she
His Worship as
urns nz ration
d to
nil, and
some C.

vs most