Northern Times.
Liverpool, Merseyside, England, 1859-03-29 00:00:00

Paris and English:makes.

Lon don Kids.

Worcester do.
Yeovil do.

Florentine do.

Alpine do,

Grenoble do.

SHAWLS ....Paisley, French, and Vienna, filled long

Grenadine, Tissue, and Barege, &e., &c.

MANTLES .. Every novelty in Mantles made by our own
Machines.

BONNETS AND ) ....20 Cases of the newest shapes in Paris
MILLINERY Millinery, London and Dunstable Straw,

&c:,
CARPETS . . Tapestry Carpets 2s 3d, Brussels, Wilt n
Velvet, and Kidderminster, Floor Cloths,
&e., &c., planned and fitted by experienced
workmen.
...Every description of Damasks, Chintzes,
Table Covers, Cdrnice Poles, Cornices, &c.,
&c., Bedsteads and Bedding. Five cases o f
White Windo4l Curtains will be opened on

DAMASKS,

Tuesday next. These goods are only one

half their value, and will wash and wear

The Linens, Flannels, Muslins, and Calicoes, will be found well
stocked with the most useful and serviceable goods, as also the
Outfitiug, Stays, Boots, Bre.

SHIPS FITTED OUT.

FUNERALS ECONOMICALLY SUPPLIED.

LIVER ESTABLISHMENT, CHURCH STREET.

R. J. J NODDER,
HAT MANUFACTURER,

81, CHVR Cli-STREET.

GENTLF.IIYN'S FRENCH. TEATS.
VELVET HUNTING CAPS.
SHOOTING HATS.
LADIES' RIDING HATS.
YOUNG LADIF.S' AND INFANT'S DRESS HATS, BONNETS, &C.
YOUNG GENTLETIEN'S HATS AND CAPS.
LIVERY HATS, GOLD AND SILVER LACE BANDS AND COMADIta.

JO S E P II W R I G iiTi ,
HATTER TO HER MAJESTY,
30, CHURCH-STREET, LIVERPOOL,
Begs most respectfully to announce that he has received his New
STOCK of GOODS, suitable for Spring and summer
com-
prising the Newest and most Fashionable Shapes' VlZ..—wear,
LADIES' STRAW RIDING HATS,
YOUNG LADIES' AND GIRLS' STRAW, CRINOLINE, AND
LEGHORN HATS,
BOYS' AND CHILDREN'S STRAW, CRINOLINE, AND
LEGHORN RATS
BOYS' STRAW, CRINOLINE, AND LEGHORN CAPS,
OSTRICH AND Vitr\-,
.. COQUE FEATHERS, AND RIBBONS IN

GREAT VARIETY.
GENTL
EMEN'S LIGHT SUMMER RATS.

SOLE AGENT FOR
LINCOLN AND BENNETT'S HATS.

F4&I3;EQIVITELL'S NTEW PATENT VULCANISED
LIME-STREET, ,ors,
szieNDll,eAa-,Rituilftu7latridTuTrnacileL,
wlD4)::)rw.t.us
53, CASTLE-STREET. the possibility of a child hurting itself.

ITISTORY OF THE WORKING CLASSES,
11_ Every Saturday, in the NORM/MN DAILY TIMES, Price One
Penny.

Hy ELLEWELL'S uLcAruSED INDIA - itt")"},R„
2 & 3, QUADRANT DELIVERY and SUCTION Hoar, Wlii
LIME-STREET, bear any amount of pre.sure ; light,
53, CASTLE-STRFF:T. pliant, and durable.

BANNER (LATB Hvox BANNER'

THE SPRING ASSIZES
CROWN COURT Y- _ ESTERDAY.

BEFORE MR. JUSTICE WILLES
The Court opened yesterday morning at 10 o'clock
jury having been sworn the
CASE OF ARCHIBALD MANN
was Proceeded with. The prisoner was plaeed at the bar,
and the charge of having, at Liverpool, on the
cember, committed an abominable crime, and repeattti. the

28th De-

same on the Gth, and also on the 9fil of January last, was
read over to him, to which he pleaded not guilty. Mr
lispinall appeared for the prosecutien, and,Mr. Li

r for the

defence. It

that the prisoner, who was a professional
Singer, was employed by Mr, D. C. Browne., -of Liverpool,

and for

tiled sl

he he-ad

gameke

idetl in his house. lie

two ri

ppy elli

was s'

of a cu,

was on
to him

y cutting, where h

He v

had lived

kesidencc

Den car,

the 13th

to bE

himsd

adf harm
Min. Or

consider was, that As the peAtelters had gene out, seven in
number, with a gun, stick.. s, and 'nets, what was their pur-
pose ? They would not lie likely to leave their property and
run away, withont first seeing the .strength of the game
keepers. Again, what ws thefr purpose ? Did they
intend to resist the keepers, if they should come upon them,
or stand still.? It was very likely, in their going out in
such numbers, they did not think of running away, but to
stand, and if they did. stand, 'what result would follow but
a conflict ? Then, with ;respect to the law, manslaughter
was the causing of the death of another by an unlawful
act, and every man that was concerned in the act was
answerable for the acts of his companions. He then went
through the evidence us given by the witnesses, at the eon-
cluiton of which the :jury returned a verdict of guilty of
manslaughter ag-ainstthe prisoner. He was sentenced to
ten years' penal setwitpde.
The court then aajonrned till nine o'clock, this (Tuesday)

NISI PRIUS COURT.-YESTERDAY

Mr. Justice Byles entered court at nine o'clock yesterday
morning, and proceeded with the Common Jury Cases.
LA.WILENCE V. `GAWTHORPE.—This was -an action brought
by John Lawrence, a cloth manufacturer, of Ossett, in
Yorkshire, against John GaWthorpe, the proprietor of
Aubrey Bridge Mill, in the same county. The action was
brought to recover £22 lls 8d damages, alleged to have
been caused to some cloth while undergoiner the process of
milling in the defendant's mills. Mr. Wheeler appeared
for the plaintiff, and Mr. Atherton, Q.C. with Mr.
Millward for the defence. The case for the plaintiff was,
that in October,- 1857, he sent to the defendant's -mill 40
pieces of blue cloth, which were so damaged in the process
that a loss of £9 was incurred upon the sale
of them. On the 25th' of November, he sent
some black beaver, which was likewise damaged in the
milling process, so that a loss of £3 took place ; and in
March, 1858, a quantity of gray union cloth, sent for the

_
same' purpose, underwent damage -which resulted in a loss
of £5 ss. The plaintiff communicated the fact of the
damage done to the defendant, who told him to employ a
person to " draw up the holes," which he did, and paid
- ....to lit; oacuwa 01 tut
the other sums, made up the
Phe plaintiff refused to pay

amount of the w

the, charges of defendant for milling the cloth unlesssthe
amount of the injury was deducted, and the defendant took
proceedings in the local county court. The plaintiff paid
the amount of the claim, upon the understanding that
the money should remain in court to abide the result of a
cross-action which he was about to bring to recover damages
for .the injury dime to the cloth. When the trial came on
the defendant pleaded that he was not the party who had
milled the cloth, but 'that his sons were the parties. The
plaintiff not expecting such a line of defence was unprepared
with evidence to meet it, and the consequence was that he
was nonsuitcd. Under these circumstances the present
action was brought, and the plaintiff gave evidence to show
that although the defendant's sons were engaged in the
management of his business, the defendant himself was the
party with whom he had always transacted any dealings
which passed between them. The case for the defence was
that defendant had ceased to have any personal connexion
with the milling business from July, 1857 that that busi—
ness then passed into the hands of his son John, and that he
had communicated this fact to the plaintiff. This case in-
volved a very considerable amount of strongly conflicting
testimony. The defendant denied that any such conver-
sation had taken place between plaintiff and him as plaintiff
had alleged, and denied that he had ever authorized the
plaintiff to get the holes " drawn up." He stated that he
owned the mill, but did not carry on the operations of the
business, and it was contended that it is cowmen to have
such a distinction made in that trade, and the proprietor-
ship of the mill kept entirely as a separate account from the
carrying on of the actual process of the business. The jury
found for the plaintiff for the full amount now claimed.
LIDDELL V. YOUDAN. - This was an action brought by
Mr. Edward Liddell, public officer of the Sheffield Union
Banking Company, against Air. Thomas Youdan, the pro-
prietor of a public casino in Sheffield. Mr. Atherton, Q.C.,
with Mr. Jones, appeared for the plaintiff, and Mr. Manesty,
Q.C., with Mr. Meihuish, for defendant. The action
was brought to recover £157 alleged to be due
by defendant to the Banking Company. The defendant
had paid into, court £96, which left the actual sum in
dispute £69 16s. It appeared that the defendant had been
in the habit of banking with the plaintiffs, and upon the
28th of September, 1854, he paid into the bank £6O,
which was entered into his passbook. Under the date
)th of September, the following day, there
!r entry of £6O to the defendant's credit in

of the 2'
was anotl

the passbook, lint • over the entry there had been
written the words " entered before." The plaintiffs
claimed from' defendant the amount of the balance due as
already mentioned. He refused to pay more than the
amount paid into court, contending that on the 29th of
, t• n,n rf, U
-book, and which, with'thle interc
have amounted to £69 16s. T
itry was made in mistake,
60, which defendant
The question, then, on which
,the case turned,
60, or two such sums had been paid
into the bank by the defendant. The plaintiff positively de-
posed that the second £6O was not received, and that although
the cash was balanced that night, as was the custom every
night, no such sum was found. to have been paid in.
There .was no entry whatever of it in the cash books or
journals of the bank Five balances had since been struck
with the defendant, and it was stated that on none of these

eras entered in his TI

accruing, would n
plaintiffs alleged that the second

the first sum entered was oat

as whethet'c

occasions had he made any complaint that the missing. £6O
was not placed to his credit. The plaintiff, who made the
entry of the second £6O, was examined, and deposed that
he made that entry from the ledger, and made it in mistake,
believing. that the entry in the ledger referred to the £6O paid
on the 28th, and that that sum had not been entered before.
The defendant on the other hand positively deposed, that
on the 29th of September he paid £6O into the bank, he
believed to the plaintiff, but was not quite certain upon that
point, and that he saw it entered. The jury found for the

t claimed

The Court then rosE

LIVERPOOL COUNTY COURT,

i-YEATERDAY

J. K. BLAIR, ESQ., JUDC

IMPORTANT TO THE SHIPPING INTEREST
—This Is

-CUNARD AND

OTHERS V

ROBERTS.

al action by Mess]:

Cunard, Wilson and Co., the well known brokers for the
kinst Mr. Roberts, for £l2 11s---Xl2 for the
xle of the barque Catherine, and 11s
Ur. J. B. Asninall, instructed by
nd Mr. Hime for

ro,
n on tr

,peared for the plaintiff

was heard on the 9th inst