The Express.
London, England, 1855-01-26 00:00:00

- - -
EQUITY • 001111T14.--imt.
mom ris Nurse of ias whim:
RIDLIT V. TortADY.-11111LIICT 07 • SOLICITOIL
In this rue • hill of foreclosure Wu ild hs 1W). The
matter bad Wm referred to the Master, but,trom the will-
geese of the solicits, the estate bad sot bees preseested ;
and hiluter.Borse had reported, ander the eighth seetiossol
the Maltase Abolisits AU, that he had &amassed she
patties.-hat that,Maw had sot presented the nit. The
effect et lie meth maid be to stop the snit. The ease
was Dew ban& be abs wart on a elution that the
mu alma.% letwthslnd shashess, sad that the soli-
citor, Mr. Wright. be edema Se peg this seer that bed this
incurred eassegrisaso hi aegis's, sad the sods f
applicatioe.
His Houser said be nut seesider what order he theta
sake, sad woad sews& with eons etas ethos bonito of
the soars. This wise poodles sun, sad be MI set »-
weather basing bed ere eta 'inner thesseles bakes. Mr.
Wright, it appeased. did nothiag after Dee.. KU, aid,
though he was peened by the plaintiff he made various
mesas. Mr. Wright last acted as ageat r eneffase soli-
citor, who bad lime hid, and them was a banes dos to
Kr. Wright hew)* isthaelgal, which was peebtidy the
reason why ha meow lap spit. Be snail out anew the.
interests of a Atm to be thus essrifieed. He should make
Mr. Wright pay the oasts of this motion, sad Me elisat
must zadertake to bring an nation against him.
Mr. Hipdi Palmer appeared for the plaintiff; sad Kr.
Crechaell for Mr. Wright.

CB2l MID ZONINION IP. ZINK AND rusnMe.
This was a motion for an injunction sod a rimiest.
The plaintiffs in this cam ass merchants at Liverpool, and
this defendants are broken. Plaintiffs in the coarse of their
business consigeed goods to the firm of Kirk, Marshall, and
Co., of Melbourne, and Kirk and Farina made advances
on the cargoes, it beiag agreed that Kisk,Marshall and Co.
mould remit *oKirk and Tarsi's. CUT and Robinson are
now carrying no badness ander a deed of inspectorship,
and it was Abased that they owe to Kirk and Pumas a
som of 6622. on these transactions, and that they have
offered td pay that mu, sad to receive the remittances from
Malbenras themosluse. Kirk and 'amiss, however, claim
• large au, hacksaw a balance due to them on other
transactions. Linder them cdraimatancsa it was now smelt
to obtaia an fajneetles to restrain them from rmeiving the
remittances on their way horn Australia.
His Himont mid he thought thus ought to be an Jejuna-
tioa and • receiver, is order to preserve the land, which
would be the subject of adjudication hereafter.

COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH.--JAN. 25.

MIMS 01 ILLIPOO.-111111011 LOU CANIZI/A. AMP JIM= 001.11•
]lnc; WISIFIXAS 411011110111.
CROTT e. LORLDT 111 LORD WARD).—RIORTS
DOIROLDIRS 111 Rll MAJISTVIII TRIAT/L3.
This was an action of ejectment against the defendant u
the lessee of Her Mejesty's Theatre. A few days ago, au
application was made by Sir Pitaroy Kelly for a Metalling
upon the plaintiff to show oases why Lord Ward, who held
two boxes in the theatre ander a lease, should not be let in
to defend the adorn.
Mr. Willis ass showed cause against the rule, contend-
ing that Lord Ward had no title to the bezel, but only the
use of them nadepeortain provisions.
Lori Campbell add the Court was of opinion that Lord
Ward bed rode out a prima fade case which entitled his
to their emmideration, bat still it would be very hard oaths
plaintiff it all who were in the sane position as his lordship
should be admitted as defendants. Such a coarse would
lead issedisis iltiptiaa, sad would entail ruinous some.
Theesert felt inclined to maks the rule absolute, if some
t could be made to obviate this difficulty.
Sir . Rally having expressed an opinion that an arrange•
sent weld be owns to between the partici,
Lord Campbell—Then, is that seas, the rule would be
made absolute.
Rule aceordingly.

•TZILI V.

BMIGIUTION orrioaa's

The plaintiff in thiamine, a shipowner, fitted onto vessel
called the Waterloo, and made as spidtestion to the de-
&admit, whe was aa emigration Aker wader the Passengers
Ail, for a certifieate, but he refused to great it, salsas oar
third of the urge was taken eat. The plaintiff emnplied
with this sendidem, sad then brought an attics for the re-
fusal of the Medina". At the trial a verdict w.as found
for the defendant, and leave was reserved to the plaintiff to
move for a mew trial. It appeared that by the 264.11 section
of the Partenaers' Act, no ship was to be granted a certifi-
cate by an migration °Miser if the cargo contain 4 certain
articles set forth in the act, or any articles the q &entity or
quality of which might, in the dicer's opinion, mdanger
the safety of the vessel or the health and lives of the pus

weirs.
Mr. Haowlee and another learned annul wow showed

cause against the rule.
Mr. Cowling sod Mr. Jones supported it.
Lord Campbell was of opinion that the defeadsat had
acted in strict accordaace with the act of parliament. It
was not imputed that he bad ia this Intimation evinced
say "alio,. Oa the contrary, it was evident that b• had
acted bona fide, He wee, therefore, entitled to the judg-
ment of the court, and the rule should be discharged.
Rule diacharged accordingly.

BAIL COURT.-JAN. 25.

This court, In eonammenoe of the elitists in London, did
not sit to-day. Many counsel were in attendance to make
motions.

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS.-JAN. 25.
1131011 q WION-WOlOl Cl= rump m•u. ■I. MIMS ZAVIJI.

EAMIIIi ♦MD MEW V. WI

The plaintillb in this ease were shipowner, and the de-
fondest was the 100114111 y of the Shipowners' Towing Com-
pany. The plaintiffs sued to recover damages, in erase-
queues of a collision which had happened between their
Tema and a vessel belonging to the Towing Compeny,
whilst navigating the Thames. The defendant pleaded
that the merits of the present case had been tried and de-
termined in certain proceedings in the High Court of Ad-
miralty, to which the plaintiffs and the defendant were
pantie.. To this plea there was • demurrer, which to-day
cams on for argument.
Mr. Finleson appeared to argue in favour of the demurrer,
aad Mr. Milwerd to support the plea.
The principal point submitted to their lordships was that
the plea was bad, inasmuch as it did not state that the
Court of Admiralty had jurisdiction In the matter; sad it
was submitted that, for aught that appeared, the seeident
might have occurred in that part of the Thames which was
within the body of English counties," mad where the
jurisdiction of the Admiralty Court did not eland.
The court was of opinian that the plea wee bad for the
reason suggested, and that the demurrer must be allowed.

INSOLVENT DEBTORS' COURT.--.Lix. 25.

111110111 111.

IN RI JOHN DRIW.

This isisolveat, whose cue was before reported, was
further heard. Mr. Dowse appeared ter a creditor named
Austin. . .

Oa sr ye adjourned on the former omission without
bob. the protection renewed, and the question wag who-
then a day maid now be named for a final order, sad • re-
•ewal given of the protection.
Mr. Commissioner Murphy did not think that he could
same a day and give protection. He should retain to ap-
point a day for the final order.
Adjourned size die.
IN ZS

COLIGATII .

This sass was reported on blonds,. The insolvset had
insartod Captain Verson's a debtor. He, was wow dis-
charged.
IN BA IDWALILD 011011011 LIAWILLYS.

In this ease Mr. Macrae and Mr. Reed eggsgmL .Tbe
insolvent, • gas fitter, 'petitioned under the
net early in November, and the meenregem Of the mart
had sot served the notices till tba lei Of Renumber. In
ignorance of the petition, one of tbe eggesingteethed
proceeded in a county court, and umber allswed his debt
to be incensed to a small amount by the inseieent.
Mr. Commissioner Murphy named • day be the final
order, with an intimation that the case wesielben ha ad-
journed sine die. The delay of the messeagena as the ser-
vice of the notkee_beA otwitabthed the euefifielate of the
creditors, and if it again occurred they wontlmusgensled,
and is • seeond odesplaint dismissed. •