The Express.
London, England, 1864-06-25 00:00:00

LAW INTELLIGENCE.

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS.—Jrwa 21.
SitUng• at Nisi Prins in Middlesex—(Belon Lord L 4
Justice Erb and a Special Jvuy.)

BILIMIEDOII P. LLTSKII.—TBZ isAILNISTAPLB ==ION.
After air mom left yesterday.
Tim jury, after a short consultation, foaad a verdict for
the plaintiff, damages 300'.

COURT OF PROBATE AND DIVORCE.
Jon 21.
BULLOCK V. BULLOCK, LUCAS, AND SHIRLEY.
ID the above osee, pnilT reportcd in yesterday's E,,
s do:maid was declared. Nu application was
oasts.

THE POLICE COURTS.

HAMMERSMITH.

Samuel Haut" better to the Dowager Lady Abioger, of
Quails-gate-terrace, Kensington. surreodered to his f,,11
before Mr. Ingham, os a charge of being drunk and assault.
Log Lord Abioger.
M. Lewin, of Ely-place, appeared for the defendant.
Lord William Frederick Abioger stated that be returned
borne with bar ladyship from a party about half-past eleven
o'clock oa Tuesday night, and on catering the hall be see
that the defendant bad been drinking. He told the defen.
dant that he was drunk, but be replied that be was not.
Wane's, supposing that there had Wu a carousel amoog
the servants, and afraid of serious injury in
the stables, through the defendant's
room, which led to the back yard, for the
purpose of asoortaioing whether the horses were safe. How-
ever, when he got into the room be found a female sitting on
the bed, and the defendant represented her to be a friend.
She gave witness her name and address. aod said the gen-
tleman, pointing to the defendant, had brought her there,
and that she had never seen him before. Witness then
walked her to the front door, followed by the defendant,
who used very foul language, and said he hated Lady
Abioger, and that be would not serve her. He (witness)
could not tolerate such conduct, end he thought there was
not any gentlemen who would either, and be requested the
defendant to follow the female, and told him that he
did not feel justified in allowing him to remain any longer
in the house. He refused, and ',items then took him by
the collar for the purpose of removing him from the house,
not using any more force than was neetosary. The defend-
ant resisted and struck him. Witness released his hold,
end duck the defendant in return. They had a severe
Waggle. Wituese knocked him down, and they had a
fight. Her ladyship being is a nervous suite be was very
ea:ions that there should not be any more noise than was
, and when his rvant came up he requetsd him
:lowl=y se
the defendant. Witoess then walked upstairs
to his room. He was proceeding to wash him.
self when the &gaudiest entered the room, and said
" Have lot roc both now ; ra do for you and I'll kill her
ladyship.' Witous was not then prepared for fighting. The
defendant struck him on the face and gave him a black eve.
Witness fought him again. The defendant need very dui-
gusting language towards her ladyship, and witness fought
sway to the door to draw him from the inside. as she could
have beard every word in the adjoining room. Witness
afterwards went out for a constable, and gave the defendant
is charge. Witness regretted very much to have to bring
the oue to that wart, me the defendant's wife was a very
respeseable woman, and had been fifteen years is the service
of the family.
Mr. hub= Used the defendant 31., and in default of
pyrites& to be imprisoned for days with hard labour.
The fine was immediately paid.