The Express.
London, England, 1864-02-24 00:00:00

HALL 0.. HALL AND HART.

Mr. Searle was coma& for the petitioner, a baree-buiklar,
at Wandsworth, who prayed a dirolution of his multiage,
and claimed damages to die extent of 50N. egainst the co-
respondent. The respondent did not appear.
The marriage took place in 1856, and the parties lived
happily together till the respondent 000tracted an immoral
intimacy with a fellow-lodger, William Berry, the foreman
of • timber yard. Hall, bong away at his bunco., was un•
aware of the misconduct of the respondents ; but it was so
obvious to the inmates of the borne that the landlord
gave the Halls notice to leave, without, however, stating
the moon. The corespoodent sought her out at her new
lodgings, and in December, 1862, persuaded her to elope
with him. There had been no issue of the =map; but
since her aconexion with the co-respondent she had borne a
child.

Ths jury found a verdict with 1001. damage,.
Decree nisi, with wan
BTAJTSALD t. STAIILLILD LID DAVIDHIL—C4I7IIOII TO

ATTOILVITS.

Mr. Serjeaut Parry ad Mr. Cole for the petitioner ; Mr.
Searle for the respondent.
The petitioner was a medical man connected with a hontoo.
Whir hospital. He married Louise Malone; a Freoch-
woman, in 1552, and lived with her till 1857, when there
was a temporary separation. In 1g.% the parties were
rex...toiled for • short time, after which the respondent finally
left her husband. She had horse him two children, of whom
one survived. After the final separation she east to Paris.
Respecting her life there the petitioner had no information,
but he alleged be had discovered that in May last she
was living in Brompton-row with the co-respondent, who
was supposed to be a gentleman of property.
Owing to the compromise of Osborne v. Osborne, the
este nose on somewhat unexpectedly, and neither the
attorney nor the accessary witneuses were present..
Sir J. Wilde strongly °assured the negligence of profes-
sions! roes ; and said that is the Deli similar ores be would
let the natter go the Fir,. They would, of cenne,findageinet
the petitioner, and be trusted that the unfortunate suitor
would then bring his action against his attorney. the
present instance the cue night stand over the next
4,ttitri ; but it should be the last he would postpone.
The jury was accordingly dismissed without finding a ver-
dict.

corm V. oOoog AND riarstoN.
Mr. Coler:dre, q.C., and Mr. Vigo for the petitioner;
Dr. Apish and Mr. Saute for the reeponcleat ; Mr. Brown-
ing for the co.respondent.
The petitioner, William SAIL* Gough, a dairyman at
Long Ashlar, mar Bristol, sued for a divorce on account of
his wife's adultery with George Banton, the son of • large
brewer in that at ; and he claimed LOON. as dansages.
The respoadeot pleaded denial and condonation. The co-
respondent simply denied the charge.
At the time of the marriage, February 5, 15t56, both
parties were under 20 years of age. and the wedding was
a private one. The respondent had bees • servant, named
Louisa PowelL For some little time they lived apart, but
the petiticeer's father, on hearing of the marriage, received
them into his house, where they stayed for three months.
They afterwards took lodgings, and at last removed
rot') • louse of their owe, where they cobs,
bite' on very fair terms, till the co-respondent, who
raided in the neighbourhood began to make the nape°.
dent's aciptaintame. Some differences arose on this subject,
bet they were ultimately adjusted. In Jane, 1862, the
petitioner came up to see the Great Exhibition ; and on his
return he made arrangements for his wit* to have • 'lender
ho'iday. She wu to have come up to some relations of
hers at Pimlico ; but her hastened discovered that she had
haver gone there. He immediately set off in search of her ;
sod wh,le he ass absent she came back to Bristol. When
he retorted he began to remove his furniture ; and while he
was so employed his wife came to the honer. He asked her
where she had been ; and sbe told him that was her bugles's.
They were dually separated.
After bearing evidence. the jury found for the petitioner,
and awarded 5004 as damages.
Decree nisi, with costs.

Ax AURTRALIAN CENTLWARIAN. —The South
Australian papers record the death of Mrs. Williams, ICO
Year. old. flbe was a native of Fishguard, in Wales. gli•
emigrated from England at 85 years of age.
M Ara ESIONY. —A matrimonial intelligence
La office
as hem, h opeoed Catharine. Quads. Reading in
their mines or loitiala are requested to Melon a photograph
for the inspection of those about to make a choice.—
Canadian paper.