The Express.
London, England, 1862-05-23 00:00:00

PRIVATE BUSINESS.

The Halifax Corporation Bill was reed a third time and
peened.
Knabee's Divorce (India) Bill wooed through committee.
OOPYRIGHT (WORKS OF ART) BILL.
End GRANVILLE moved the second reading of this bill,
the gnat object of which he explained V> be to protect
artists from fraudulent copies or inferior works being
off as the works of known molten. The great difficulty
that had bean found in dealing with a matter of this port
lass to decide whether the copyright should be given to the
producer or the purchaser ; but he believed that the way in
which this bill dealt with that question entirely removed
the difficulty. It proposed to give a copyright during the
life of the producer, but that copyright could only be given
id ter a certain written agreement had been entered into be-
tween the artist and the Ant pnrohmer of the work, and if
either party objected to enter irate such an agreement then
the present law applied, and the conflicting right+ of the
two parties were not in the slightest degree interfered with
by this bill. He did not know that any objection would be
offered to the bill, but he should be reedy to consider any
suggestions that might be offered for its amendment in com-
mittee.

Lord OVERSTOICE submitted that the bill required a
much more careful cosaidemtion than it bad evidently
received, sad suggeeted that it should be withdrawn, with
the view of bringing forward a more perfect measure in
a future motion.

Earl kitTl.ifiOPE did not think that case of valid ob-
jection had been made ont by the noble lord, the whole of
whose speech appeared to be based upon a !Okay. He
thought the better course would be to read the bill •
second time, and consider what amendments it would be
advisable introdace in committee.

Lord TAUNTON did not consider the bill calculated to
promote the true interest of art or artists, and objected, in
the interests of the public, to legislative interference for
the purpose of preventing the multiplication of works
of high art.
The LORD CHANCELLOR regarded the bill as an act
of simple justice to artists, and calculated to promote and
encourage art. The 4th clause of the bill bad
been introduced in consequence of the evidence given
beton a committee of artists, from which it appeared
. that a number of pictures had been copied and altered by
inferior artists, and had been sold again as works by the
original painter. One remarkable instance was stated by
Yr. Charles Landseer, the painter of a picture in which be
bad introduced two dogs, which had been touched up by Sir
Edwin Landseer, and, as the artist himself admitted, greatly
improved. This picture was sold to a dealer who cut out the
rof the dogs, then sold them as the works of Sir
wr: Landow, end then he filled up the original pat-tare
with two dogs painted by an inferior artist, and sold the
whole picture as the work of Mr. Charles Lindner.
(Laughter.) These were some of the frauds committed upon
artists of celebrity. Now whoever attempted to multiply
works of art after the paining of this bill would be liable to
be prosecuted for piracy. A point bad been raised
In reference to photographs, but he thought no difficulty
would occur in detecting imitations of original photographs.
He did not deny that there were many provnions
in the bill which would deserve consideration in committee ;
bat as the great priatiple of the ball was to
party in works of art, he hoped they would anlotirpur:
the same footing as works of biteratore, and that would be
rendering only natural justice to artiste; and all their lord-
ships must be impressed with some dopes of surprise that
it had been so long deferred. (Hear, hem.)
The bill was then read a second time.
THE CHANCERY REGULATION BILL.

This bill pared through committee, acme verbal mood-
mists having been made on the motion d the Lent

Hair lordship adjounaid iit a quarter pert eix.

ROUSE OF COMMONS.—TaussDAY, MAY 22.
The &mama took the ebair at 4 deka.
PRIVATE BUSIR

The following bills IMO read a third time and prod
The Dutgin and Mesa BAR ; Greenock and Wismar
Bay Railway ; and the North Beets Railway bills.
LONDON AND NORTH WESTERN RAILWAY
(ADDITIONAL POWERS) BILL.
Upon the order of the day that this bill be considered,
Mr. BARS moved that the bill be consideted this day
mwt►.
Sir R. PEEL seecrided the motion.

formally presented to the government, tat he believed it
would be preseated to-morrow, and he should be able to
lay it oe the table iu the early part of mat week.
With regard to the return, it would be pireeeted to
morrow.

PTHIS IN THE METROPOLI&

- -
Mr. DOULTON imbed the Secretary el Slate for the
Home Department whether it wu the intention of her
Majesty's government to take any action, during the pre-
sent session, upon the report of the committee on area in
the metropolis.
Sir G. GREY said the report of the committee had been
printed and circulated the day before yesterday. Be had
not yet had tine to consider it. He bad referred the report
to the Chief Commissioner of the Police.

Mr. B. MUTH/FAD oppoesd the motion.
After a few words from Lord blithairax,
The emeednunt was negatived without a division, and the
bill was coonisred sad agreed to.
UNITED KINGDOM ELECTRIC TELEGRAPH
COMPANY BILL.
Upon the motion that this bill be read • second time,
Mr. HUMBERSTON said that as the bill empowered
the company to end poste end wizen wpm the highways and
turnpike roads throughout the kisad ea, he would move
that the second reading be deferred for • week, in order that
the public might have doe unties that such a measure was
before the house.
Mr. HENLEY supported the amendment, and said he
was of apiece that looking to the provisions of the bill, it
eight to come before the bouts as • public measure, and not
as a private bill. (Hoer, hear.)
Mr F. SMITH thought the proposition to postpone the
bill was a most unreasonable one. (Hear, hear.) The bill
would have the effect of breaking up the monopoly of the
other telegraph companies. Why should the public be plun-
dered by having to pay M. fora merge instead of la, the
amount charged by this company. The proper tribunal to
consider the maws was a Weed committee, before whom
oil pasties would be beard. (Hear, hear.)
Lord A. CHURCHILL opposed the postponement
which he thought a most unusual step. (Hear, hear.)
Mr. M. GIBSON said the Board of Trade had no wish
either to supportor oppose any particular electric telegraph
company, but he thought the promoters of the present hill
were entitled to have it read a second time, and referred to
• select committee. After their investigation it weld be
quite open for the house to deal with the bill as it thought
proper, but he thought it wield be most unfair to throw it
out upon the Roomed reading. (Hear, hear.)
Mr J. SHELLEY urged the importance of the subject of
eleetrie telegraphs being treated as a whole in a public
MIMIC
Lord HOTHAJI said the object of the postponement was
to enable the government to determine whether this should
be treated as a public bill, but the right hon. gentleman
had not said • word upon that point.
After • few observations from Mr. HODGSON, the amend-
ment was withdrawn, and the bill was read a second time.
THE NAWAB OF THE CARNATIC.
Mr. H. BAILLIE gave notice that on Tuesday next he
should t a petition, signed by 15000 inhabitants
of the y of Madras, praying this house to do
justice to the Newab of the Camelia, who was deprived of
his dominion. by the East India Company in 1856.
THE LABOURERS EMPLOYED ON THE SUEZ
CANAL.
Mr. GRIFFITH asked the Under-Secretary of State for
ForeignAffers whether berMajesty's governmen t would make
meow efforts to prevent the continuance, oo the pert of
the Pack" of Egypt, of the employment of forced labour on
the Suez Canal?
Mr. LAYARD was understood to reply that the only an-
swer be could give was that this was a matter to be settled
between the Torkek government and the Packs of Egypt.
BRITISH COLUMBIA OVERLAND TRANSIT.
Mr. MALCOLM asked the Under-Secretary of State for
the Colorise whether the attention of her Majesty's go-
vernment bad been directed to an advertisement in the
Times of the 17th instant, of the British Columbia Over-
land Transit Company, and to the primps...tun that had been
joined by the said company, in which offers were made to
convey 600 emigrants from England to British Columbia
direct, the paseage-money to be 421., and the journey to
occupy five weeks ; whether he was aware that(a vessel is to
start from Glasgow, on the 31st of May, with a large
number of persons who had engaged their passages io the
terms of such advertisement ; whether her Majesty's Emi-
gration Commissioners bad satisfied themselves that the
BrjtiahColumbiaTransit Company had made arrangements,
sod had it in their power to carry the emigrants to British
Columbia in terms of their advertisement ; and whether
they had considered the probability of the intending
emigrants being starved between Montreal and British
Columbia.
! Mr. C. FORTESCI2 E said this advertisement had not
escaped the attention of government, and they had received
• report on the subject from the Emigration Commissioners,
who 101L0 ten days ago thought it their duty to inquire into
the facts of the case, and invited some one representing this
overland transit to an interview. Accordingly a gentleman,
a Colonel Sleigh representing the company, did go to the
,
Emigration office, and bad an interview with the commis-
sioner., and be assured the commissioners that all the p -
perations specified in their advertisement had been made,
and that the parties to be sent out by this route to British
'Columbia would not be so large as the number mentioned,
but would probably not reach 100, and would consist entirely
of able-bodied young men, and there would be no women,
children, or old mm in the party. That being the case the
Emigration Commissioners reported to the Colonialeffthe
that there was no. 'tacked amps for in-erfereece. He
wee far feat saying that the company would be
skin to wary en all they premised in their prospectus,
as te time. Bat the government, although
Zig= that glen Misdates would have to he en.
;agoole* ea Ike way, did not anticipate that the emigrants
:Weld hove to mime politic hardships than young
finglithremi in the pentiver mign be able to overcome.
THE NATIONAL DEFENCES.
Mr. B. 08802.1111 snail if the report of the commis•
theism on national dolmas bed been presented to the go-
vern:poet, and, B so, whim the report would be laid be-
fere whammed. oleo dodred to know the mon for
tie delay in • Morn moved for by the right
here.., member tor Limerick, specifying the details of the
elgenditure of two millions onthe fortifications at Spit-
lead.
In G. C. LEWIS said the report had not yet beim

Elmcgsq. FRIDAY EVENING, MAY 23, 1862.

Ulifilitestrovertal the Musitions of Sir R. •
Peel as io the opinion of certain of the Boman adholic
prelates ta favour of the Queen's college. ; and denied that
the mixed system of education was a universe! SWOON,
charecteridag it as, is three provisoes of Ireland, a
monstrous sham. All that wee 'eked by the catholks of
Ireland wee that edueatise should be established on the
principle which prevailed sad was maintained in England
—namely, the deeeedeadoesl system.
Mr. POLLARD-lIMQUHART urged that the chases
which had taken place in the feelinp of the Roman catholic.
of Ireland towards the national system of education, once so
esteemed, was calmed by an alteration in the role by which
proselytism was rigidly exeluded from the schools.
The debate was ocatinued by Mr. Lefroy, Mr. MAlabon,
Mr. Hadfield, sad Mr. Macdosogh, the subject-matter of
their spesohmetzestatteek on and &fano, of the estab-
lished church
Major MILDLY brought back the diecunion to the
subject of educate., and argued that the acceptance of the
mixed system in Ireland by the Roman catholic, had beat
partly recalled in stenos of the change which had
bean made in its main
Mr. WHITRUDR, ea elaborate speech on the gene-
ral question, "tared into an explanation of some mitten
of detail relating to Trinity College, Dublin, which had
been referred to by Sir B. Peel, correcting some erroneous
statements made by the right hon. sesames, and vindicat-
ing the claims of that institution to • high position in the
educational system in Ireland.
Mr. Messett. and Mr. Ilemuseav having spoken,
Lord PALMERSTON said I should hope that the gentle-
men who take an intend in the Queen s Colleges sad it
the education question generally are made& with the die.
maim which has telompleas—(hear bar)—stdtibial bee
now lasted Name then de hours Timm is other badman
bakes the honend I tenet that times hon. mambas who
may dill w esprese their *aims upon the subject
will have the Madam to defer their swishes until some
other opperteldby BR delivering them caws, so that we
may beadblareeleellisal prem
la go into the orders of the(Hei day, which are
of
taore mad ing important*. hear.
Ir. H. O'PERBALL said he thought that ar,
question
which lad occupied the house for six hours was entitled to
BOOS expremion of opinion from her Majady's goverament.
Thirty yeas. age, whoa the subject was first tatsodessel, the
government were eatimelsd with the educative of the people
of Leased, and the meet solemn pledge is gives that
the
Titan to be adopted should be above all af pro-
selytism. No maa man warmly thee he dH
the lemmas. amount of t to Inland whisk
abiestice bad effected—he believed it to he even
, Fader thsa that resulting iron catholic canna-
ciliation. (Hear, beer.) But the pledge ceigiirelly given
bed been broken, the system had bele elleaded, the,.
for, the bishops at the Roma catholic church cooed-
eatiously believed that it was dengereas to their redigios,
and that it meld not say Jaeger to be forced open the
people. He regretted that one of the ant site of the right
hon. baronet the Chief Semetery for Ireland on entering
omen had been to raise a discussion on a subject of all others
the most exciting. bat he trusted that the tame far the est-
tismait of the question was not far dletent
The motion was then withdrawn.
SUPPLY.

I f ien the order of the day for bringing up the report cm
su y,
. AYRTON moved as an amendment on the question
for reading the resolution of the committee a mooed
time, that a select committee be appointed to inquire into
the amount for which the harbour and fortificetioes of
Alderney would' be oompleted.
Mr. BAXTER doubted whether, if they Willi on veiling
50,0001. or 100,00 W. a year, these works would be am-
Aided in three years. It wee Mated by the fiecretery to
the Tressery Use other night that the work would be com-
pleted for 237.0001., but it was "Omitted that the plan upon
which they were proceeding wee the one 'climatal to met
1,3540001., of which, thirster", then would 1111111i11
350,00 W. yet to be expended. Bet be had no faith in times
estimates, mid was isoevieted that if they went on
voting money in this way the cart would far exceed the
estimates
. . . . .

THE

'OLICE COURTS.

LAMBETH.
Yeeteniey, Mary Morris, the wife of • bargeman, was
choWbecke the Hem. G. C. Norton with being drunk
and diamdarly, and araaniticag Cherie. Kennedy. 181 L, and
it wag ferther said that her drunken conduce led to the
death of her female infant, six weeks old.
The primer, who appears the perfect picture of dimi.
pation and wretchedness, was put to the bar in her ordinary
torn, when it was discovered that she wee drunk, and was
in co ethos locked up until the other Wainer of the
day bad hen disposed when she was again brought up
for examination. From the evidence it appeared
that between the hours of 5 and 6 o'clock on
the evening before, the prisoner was found by
the officer Kennedy in Broad-street, Lambeth, much
intoxicated, and making a great disturbance. The officer
told her that he could not allow such conduct, and that
unless she went about her basilicas he must remove her to
the station-house, upon which. she struck him in the face.
At the station-house her baby was taken from her, and sent
to Lambeth Workhouse; but on being bailed out shout
10 o'clock she hastened to the workhouse, got' her child,
and returned with it to the Queen's Head public-house,
where she again became so drunk that she dropped
the infant from her arms. A young woman, named
Mary Ann Staler'', volunteered, though little less in-
toxicated than the prisoner herself, to take oars of
the child till morning, and took it with her to the
house of a Mr. Bailey, when she went to bed with it, and
on awakening at • little before 9 o'clock on that morning
she found the infant quite dead and oold. Some time altar
this discovery the officen Kennedy and Hornsby went in
search of the prisoner, and after some time found bar 'gain
in a public-houee quite drunk.
Mr. Norton observed that the evidence in the use die-
cloned a some of drunkenness and disgraceful conduct
scarcely conceivable, and remanded the prisoner to •
future day.
Some days ago • poor but decent-looking woman, named
Wood, whose husband is helper in a cab-yard, applied
to Mr. Norton aid complained of the conduct of
Mr. Cope, the relievingofficer of Lambeth parish, in
withhekling from her poor old mother • stipend of 2s. 6d.
• week, which had been allowed to her. From her elate-
meat to the inagblaste, it appeared the the vpliesat
having two children of bar own, and her husbandonlk earn-
ing from 10a. to 15s. a week, was unable to maintain her
mother, and the parish in consequence allowed her halfa.
mown • week up to a few weeks ago. Her soother bed on-
fonthately met with an accident, and broken her leg, and
was in soesequenod removed to Guy's Hoepitel, where she
remained for several weeks, and when about to leave, Mr.
Steel. the of the medical officers of that institution,
wrote to the relieving oilier requesting that he wethil—a
AL to the stipend of Sa. 6d., as the old women in ha
then state would require a little more noisrlanseet than
before. The way in which the officer Cops met this tonna
lent application wee by refusing to pay even the half-
crown ; and the reason he gave for tlhis was that the
daughter had no business to have the Ferias money while
her mother wee in the hospital; and thee& she aerated hint
that she had made hiss acquainted with the fast, sad that
the half •erown wee appropriated to the pigmented her reek
which was going on, he still adhered to his determination,
end refused to renew the allowance.
. . . . .

hissing the poor woman's itateneet, for-
warded a merge to the relkyrin4 otiose repw&ng him to
reconsider the case, or represent it fairly to the baud of
guardians, and this be promised to do. Yeetaday
Wood again made ber appennos before Mr. Nodes, and
said she bad been taken before the board of guardians, when
Cope rem and addressed the putlemen, representing the
are se one in which out relief should not be pealed, aid
the result was that all that amid bodes, was to receive her
mother into the workhouse, though she had a edified, to
show that her being removed would be attended with peat
danger, she being 98 years of age and laboaring seder an
attack of ague. •
Mr. Norton expressed surprise that the guardians &add
have allowed themselves to be misled by the relieving
officer, and said that for his own pert he considered the con-
duct of the °Moat to be one of persecution, and a total ab.
seam of proper humanity an his vizi. He then ordered the
poor woman some temporary usisilusee from the poor-box,
for which she expressed her pentads.

Lord PALYERBTON—My hoc. friend who hr jed eat
down mays that we do ' know what we are about ; but if
he would allow me to make a retort, I should say he, and
those who an voting with bin isn't know what they ere
about. (Laughter.) We know puhotly well we an ric-
h; the bone to give ea the mean of oompleting a work
whith vs thin will be of greet nedosal Wrenn, They
are, aa the ha. 'Decatur mid, working Ia the dark. They
are net swan ef the mischief they are nation to do.
They are emisevendog to mead us doing thee which
will he useful to the anon, and width, if left as it ie now,
would be • misthiel instead of • isneft. The plea
has been, end is, before the hens. There is
• phut mend D and K., shun"' crudely the limited
=inn to which ors propose that the- work Amid now be
carried on. My eiot bon. frignahled that it would sort
at the whole 1,300,000/ Thee ea °Wenn is taken, baser
my noble friend eve vary properly lin ma men in hind
precisely the time bi which • work to he carried on is a
'Sinaloa very mach ezpoesd to the weather will be eau
doted ; bat is all human probability it will be
before the anintioa of three years (Hear, bear. Y)
hoe. friend the member for Norfolk asked • question which
I might 'lnset omit to answer, because it was completely
answered by the honourable and gallmt genie-
man who spoke from the beach behind him.
But, it may be asked, what is the us of this slued of
Alderney and its fortification by lead! We have been
told that these works would be of the .feast hoportasoe
with reference to our operations in the Channel. (Hem.)
Alderney on the one side, and Portluad on the other, would
give us the meths of watching the operations of the
enemy in the Channel. sad would thus be of the greatest
I value to the safety of the sentry. Bat the bon. gentle-
man says that it would take 5,000 men to defend these
works, and be sake, " Would you lock up 6,003
men in the defense of a fortress like that!' The
object Is not to defend the fortress, but to occupy •
position bearing upon sand and military operations, for the
defence of our coasts. Ido sot believe that the somber of
troops would be required which the hoe. gentleman has
mentioned. It is the opinion of Sir John Burgoyne sod at
Lord Herding*, with whom I have frequently conversed
on the subject, that 2,000 or 3,000 men would hold the
place against any force that could be brought against it. It
L obvious, however, that if you haw se troops them
yon must have • iarbour. Yon could sot lean them
whited there ; but you most have the mans of oommuni-
sang with them and ouveying them predating and stores.
All that the government ask //1 a sum that will complete
the espendienre of 4300,0001. ; and I hope that the home
will not resin its previous decisioa. The matter baring
been Beefy dinned in committee, I hut the home will
ogres to the report. (Cheers)
Sir Y PETO said that if they finished to the points
D end IL, the harbour would be useless; for its mouth would
be open to the sea without protection of any kind. He be-
i in short, that the money would be completely
wasted. They did not uk for any rescinding of the vote,
they only asked for further information. He did cot blame
the government, because he considered that when
the house agreed to • vote, it became itself responsible
for it. He did blame the government, however, for • vial
of moral °GUINN in not conferring that the ling wee •
binder and giving it up. (Hear, hoar.)
Sir VERNEY said real question before the house
was whether they would spend 300,0001. or throw away
900,0001. If we 'abandoned Alderney an went to war wish
France, our neighbours would sioon take it and spend double
the money en it, if necesaluy. (Hear, hear.) He believed
that Alderney and Portland did really give us the command
of the Channel, and he hoped that no EnFlish minister would
be guilty of the poltroonery of abandoning the island.
The house then divided—
For the motion
For the amendment
The vote was accordingly affirmed.
THE POLICE AND IMPROVEMI
BILL.
This bill paned through committee.
THE

BOUTEiwARK.
Mr. Rickard William Webb, an elderly gentleman, de.
esribed as a solicitor, carry ieg on business at No. 111,
Jewayotreet, Aldgato waa °hired with indecently asesult-
MrMaria Shepherd, 12 yen of age, in the Wane street.
. W. Edwin appeared for the primmer.
The oomplainant said that she lived with her mother (a
widow) in Swan-row, Trinitioquare. She wee also la the
service of a . After eke had left her plate on
Wednesday el=ll:er mother seat her to Limbos,* far
her brother's dirty lines. A little after nine o'clock she
wee retuning home through Fenehurch-etreet, with the
bundle of linen in front of her, when the prisoner num up
and said, "My
_dear, is that • baby Ten hays
got r She replied that it was dirty lieu. He
walked &limpid' of her, sad wanted to take bold of her
arm. She refused to allow him, and asked him what be
wanted with her. He then asked her to enter a pastry-
cook's sod a publio-lionee with him, but she refused, and
motioned bee walk towards home. The primmer stall as-
oompaaied her, andaaked her when she lived. She told
him, and he said he would go home with her sad sleep
with her ; and when they turned into the Douv•road he
caught hold of her and hosted ber in a very Wiest sun-
nor. In resisting him her clothes ware math tore, and
she was extremely frightened. The prisons persisted is
following her into Siren-street, where, perceiving her
mother at her door, she called out sad rushed towards her.
The prisoner then ran away.
Mr. Combs—Did you call out when the prisoner pulled
you about in that Warrant manner ?
Witneas—Yea, sir. I asked the gentleman to let me go,
but basked of that he put his foot out mad attempted to
throw me down. As soon as she saw bee mother she celled
out. and then the ran off. I then told my mother
what had own and she followed the prisoner maims
him into custody.
Mr. Edwin—Wu not the prisoner very much the was
for liquor?
Wilaue—l don't know, sir. He behaved very rude tome.
Mr. Edwin—Did you make any complaint to any one
about his unduet before you told your mother !
Witness—No, sir. He did not behave rude to me until
near home, and then I ren to my mother and told her what
had occurred.
Sophia Shepherd, the mother of the girl, corroborated her
daughter's evidence.
Police-constable 145 M said that about 10 o'clock on the
previous night he was on duty in Trinity-street, when he
heard cries of "Step thief," and on turning into Swan-
street he saw the prisoner sad last witness together. She
gave him into has custody for assaulting her child. The
latter came up with her clothes torn, and she described the
manner in which the prisoner had unsuited her. The pri-
soner said, " Oh, nonsense, I have done nothing of the kind."
Mr. Edwin asked what state the prisoner was in as to
sobriety !
Witness replied that be bad evidently been drinking, but
he seemed to know what he was about.
Mr. Edwin, in answer to the charge, said that his client
had bun dialog with some friends on Wednesday evening,
and unfortunately took too much wine. He certairly dad
accost the girl, but be thought her much older, sad walked
with her as far as her home, and then he left her. He was
instructed to say that his client never assaulted her at all
or took the least liberty with her, but she encouraged him
to walk with her.
Mr. Combs asked if anything was known of the girl and
her mother?
Sergeant Gardner, the acting inspector at the Stone's-end
police station, said they were both highly respectable. The
mother had been many years a pew opener at Trinity
Church, and the girl was in the service of the clergyman.
Mr. Combs asked Mr. Edwin if he still palliated in his
lie* of defence after that?

174
118-56

MT 01;in rid that ilia client denied the assault. He
was a highly respectable roan, and would not be guilty of the
offence imputed to him.
Mr. Combo observed that the girl and her mother were
respectable, well-coeducted persona, and there was nothing
in their evidence to reflect any discredit on them. It was
a very bad case, and he should not be doing his duty iinlms
he committed him for trial.
. .

(SCOTLAND) ACT AMEND-
MENT (No. 2) BILL.
This bill ..Lo pared through armoires with verbal
amendment', sod was ordered to be reported this day.

...IYr. Edwin supposed his worship would accept bail until
the sessions?
Mr. Combs agreed to accept two sureties in 501. each, and
the prieoner's own reoogninances in 1001.