The Express.
London, England, 1855-11-19 00:00:00

TIN 017111 IP. WILES AND OT11Y.•

Mr. Bodkin moved that the certiorari is t►is cue should
be quashed. As indictment had been found against the
three defendants for fraud and misdemeanour et the Ber
timber missions of the Central Criminal Court. Briefs were
delivered to counsel, and the prosecutor was fully prepered
to try when the indictment was removed by certiorari into
this court at the instant* of one of the defendants only, and
he bad 'attired into moognillekele to pay the mete of the
prosecution if he should be convicted. He now applied that
the other two defendants should enter into similar remis-
sion:Bes, or that the one who bad entered into meognisenose
should also enter into recognisance* for them, so that the
soma of the prosecution mein be mound. This had been
done is the Queen and Probed.
His Lordship granted the rule.

COURT OF
IR7TIMIII u 11.00.-

1111QUI1R,Nov. 17.
DAMP. PAW. ALSILINOII4 ?Lan

This day was *Wally 'updated for bearing the argu-
ments is the saes of " Bovill v. Pinto," which bad undid
over a seaside/W*6nm; but in conseqesoce of the absentee
of the Lord Chief Baron, who has esetaised a severe family
bereavesteat, it was further postpossd to Thursday next.

TELTCIIII/1 V. D'Aoonrs .-IFIZACII 01 11011111 01

Ya11[•Ol.

Kr. Ramat& applied for • rule an behalf of the Men. ,
, dant, @alias on the plaintiff's attorney to show catty why
all proseediap in this vim should not be st.yed. This
was an action brought by the plaintiff, a lady residing at
Bramptae, against the defendant, LieutenaabOelonel
D'Agnilar, fer breach of promise of marriage. sad
which stood for trial at Guildhall in last Trinity
Tort, when the reseed was withdrawn for the pupas,
of enabling the parties to effect • compromise.
This applicati la was mad, on the affidavit of the de fendaat's
actors( is, which was groinad on • letter written by Mrs.
Thatcher to them, which stated that her attorney was pro.
ending with the tame notwithstanding her express wish to
the contrary, and that the procetdinp were in the first
instant* instituted easiest Colonel D'Agoilar on the trader-
standing that the plaintiff was not to he liable for the mete,
which were to hare been borne by her attorney, who is the
event of the miles beings successful was to remise ens-third
of the damages eaeevered. The learned counsel submitted
that an attorney had no power to primed with a SIMI eon-
trap to the 'Rarer wish of his Meat.
Mr. Baron Parke—Tow may take • rule to shammies, as
it is quite sleet that an Wormy has no right to go m with
an action after his principal has saprisead • sontrary
Rile nisi pealed.

11031171 O. DLL

TVs action, which was tried before Mr. Bee= Mortis, at
the sittisp at Guildhall, during the present term, was
broeght by the plaintiff, who is a sporting character, to Fe-
mme, from the defeedant 2461., which amount wes lodged
is his heads, to abide the result of certain weeen which the
plaintiff had made oa the various bones entered for the
Derby. The &deadest raid 961. into court, but ss to the
met of the amount chimed be pleaded indebted. For
the plaintiff it was shows that he bad laid 1601. to 51. with
• Mr. Eidson against Wild Dsyrell winciop the Derby, but
not feeling satrelled as to the pecuniary resources et that
patients. be, three days before the rsee wee mu, sailed
upon the defendant, who had acted es stakeholder es the
musks, and tatistated to hies that Eidson must corm the
=2,6W he mould at Gem withdraw the bet Notwit/s-
-this. Hidesei bad sot deposited the 64, sad
the plaintiff eassideeed that the bet was ..eff;" but
is eider te mesh& the poisibility of Rides.
eblehtteg the 1501., be, abet the race was over,
sad yid* resulted is the mess et Wild Derrell, tede;
VI free Ipso le the deassiaat at Binalegkase,
Idea NS to payees/ the meney to Bides.. This,
term., with the lelimatices be bed given the &indent,
est the 61. wee tells staked by Hass, er the bet was to be
eseehlared as withdraws, were relied *pen as Lots repudiat-
ing the wefts ablegsther. Oa the part of the de:widest it
wee dulled dot** bet bad been withdrawn by the
platn-
df the suss was nu. and is support of this it woe
urged that bad the pisistlif hissed: so understood it he
would set have seat • leispephis anew ordering the
deleadest leash& the seeey in his beads, which diens-
slams did me mesa le a withdrawal, as the ulcer was

sarefillywea Imam tb; steurse Tital;rn7d.
lay et the Mai. wedded*. IN stridence meet candiesep,
diet tie are Os Ifs jeepM deal& at erideb side they would
sivesedease, sad Vie*, retuned a 'grit* for the plaintiff
' der 1881., IM meant aimed.
Ms. MI sew sieved dle behalf et the f /fondest ter s
Ma waft et IM pliatlir to show pose why the verdict is
Mar am amid set be sec aside and a new Wel bad. es *lift
pineal* Ihs mast ins Natio, to the weighs to