The Express.
London, England, 1863-01-24 00:00:00

II AHL BOROUG H-STREET.

Mr. Bally, ageneral dealer, of Bavillastreet, Mar/lobos',
was charged before Mr. Koos as follow.:
Mr. Gsakin, a general dealer, said he was standing in
Marylebonestreet, the previous evening, talking to his wife,
when the prisoner came up and knocked both him and his
wife down. While be (witness) was lying on the ground the
pricier seized him by the throat, and so pressed his
knuckle. into it that he was nearly choked.
Mr. Knox asked what provocation the witness had gives
the prisoner: sod the witness said that on one occasion his
wife prevented the prisoner strangling his wife oo the bed,
and ever since he bad entertained a grudge towards them
both. _ .

—lr. W. Davis, • gentleman residing ►t 34, Neuter-
mums. mid tint bearing the cry of •' Varier," illb ma out
of a friend's boom la Marplobonomtnot and palled Um pri.
sorter off the wham. Time primmer et the time was doing
his beet to 'Mangle the vitamin, end, bat far big intierferenee,
he believed be would hay* done In.

Sarah (kakis, wife of the first witness, proved being
smatilted by the primmer, and said the black fge she bore
wee named by him. fThe was only Jost cut of her 00116041-
asst.

Mr. Davis said that the last witness's face was smothered
with blood • and Ir. Nathaniel Wakeling, Charlotte-
street, Fitsjoy-equms, proved seeing the primer knock
the complainant and his wife down.
A constable said that bearing cries of " Polioe," be wait
to the spot and saw the prisoner on the top of the first Idi-
oms, nearly choking hini. With the assistance of Mr. Davis
the prisoner was dragged from the witome (Mr. Deakin). He
also observed the female's faro covered with blood.

Mr. Harm said it was sabrnisl;;lininice2anattaelr as
be had ever bawd o 4 and be should commit the prisoner for
three months, wish bud labour.

MARYLEI3ONL

—.—
George Pink, 85 D, was charred on • Nimmons obtained
against him by Kr. Farrar, under-sheriff of the City of
London on behalf of the Crown, with having unlawfully
detained • brown silk umbrella, • gold pin with an opal In
it, and various other articles, alleged to be the property of
the =own. _ . .

It is to explain that, about thirteen months ago,
one Bianchi was soot for trial from this court for stealing a
large amount of propmty, and was sentenced to twelve
month.' imprisonment. Me now states that the articles
above described, which were taken from him at the police-
static's by Pink, have not been restored to him, but other
and inferior articles substituted in their place. Pink, in
his defence, said he bad not had charge of the property at
all. He delivered it to John Hoard, the olthoe keeper of the
Central Criminal Court, by whom it bad to be kept while
Bianchi was in prison. John Hoard, is his evidence, stated
that the articles be received from the last vitiates be hied
kept in isle custody exactly as they were given to him.
Mr. Mansfield said he had his own ideas of the case, bat
it was not for him to mention them. Pink had ocespielely
defended himself. and the charge spinet him mod be die.
mimed. The sheriffs deserved all praise for bringing the
matter forward, and he hoped they would not allow ft to
rest without making further ioquiries.

Mies Robinson, who liii;elaiinioOossiderable property
in Belgravia, and glum case was reported yesterday, applied
to Mr. Arnold for redress.
She stated that am the previous day she went as beings-
at-law according to the new act of parliament, and took pos-
session of a house belonging to her in Faton-square, from
which she had been most unceremoniously dislodged. Tbs
Lord Chancellor had in open court acknowledged bar to be
the rightful heiress of the estate to which she laid claim
there could be no doubt about the justice of her pretensions,;
and she begged the magistrate to let the police go with her,
sod reinstate her in the bows.
Mr. Arnold told her be could act do anything°, the sort.
A respectable-looking woman, about 30 yearn of ago, en.
treated the magistrate to gins her assistance under very
painful circumstances.
She stated that, Wails grestpoverty tbreeweeks ago, she
was obliged to get into the workhouse of St. Margaret's and
St. John's, with her children, the consequence°, which was
the death of one of them.
Mr. Arnold—tinder what circumstances?

Poor ekiltiren;;;at the ages of twelve-
months, fire years, and ten years. and they were taken into
the workhouse at the same domes myself. On Wednesday
I discharged myself from the worke, and my child
twelvemoothe old died.
Mr. Arnold—When did the child diet
. . . _

FoO;WOManAtl2O'cloCii; Wednesday night. I
bad diacbarged myself from the workhouse in consequence
of dimoveriog the wretched condition of my poor
which had been kept away from me. They had never to
me that anything was the matter with it ; but it was is a
shocking condition. It was • fine healthy child as aiticree.
would wish to nee whoa it went there, sad now isovio
Table to look at it.
Mr. Arnold—What do you think was the matter with It!
Poor Woman—Starvation ; and I scoot tell what has
been don, to its body.
Mr. Arnold—lf you have any memo to think that this
child died from improper treatment you must bring it under
the notice of the coroner.
Mr. Arnold told the polio, to see that ever; amistance
was afforded the poor woman in obtaining a full inquiry.