The Express.
London, England, 1862-04-18 00:00:00

WAND V. LAMB'S?.

a dispute about the mt, the plaintiff having left the pre •
mime iu September last iu comiequeuce of the defendant
having broken his promise relative to his reparlog them.
The &fence was that the defendant wu only trustee for
as °Melly lail), and that he declined from the test to repair,
he., the house, tailing the plaintiff and his wife that what
main they wanted they must do themeless. The bous
wee an old one, and well draieed to the sewer. The de.
Natant denied that the drain was in the state 'pokers to
by the plaintiff, and in consequence of the frequent com-
plaint. he gave bin. notice to quit. Subsequently the
plaintiff and hia wife came to defendant's house at Houns-
-1 ow,, and instead of paying the rent claimed 151. for
damages.
A builder who wu sent by the defendant to the house,
the inspector of nuisances, aad the medical officer of health
for the district, were called, and negatived the plaintiff's
statement relative to the state of the drain and the melts.
The jury ultimately returned a verdict for the defendant.

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS.—Arm 17.
Eittiop in Banco.—(Before Lord Chief Justice Erle, and
Justices Wilke, Brim, and Keating.)
WILLIANAOS r. TOR LONDON AND BRIGHTON RAILWAY

COMPANT.-1111 CLATTOS TONSIL ACCIDINT.

The plaintiff claimed damages for injuries sustained in
the Clayton Tunnel accident, and the company haring paid
400 f. into court, the jury found a verdict in their favour,
thinking this amount sufficient compensation.
Mr. herjeant Shoe am moved for a role for a new trial.
The Lord Chief Justice, however, stopped him, by saying
that he knew all about the cue, be having been informed of
the circumstances, believing that the action wee in the
Court of Queen's Bench ; for he should not have talked over
the matter if he had known that he should have to deal
with it judicially.
Serjeaut Shay said he was glad that his lordship knew
the circumstances, for he believed that this was for the in-

West of both parties.
The Lord Chief Justice communicated with his learned
heathens, and afterwards said that as there was some per-
sonal matter involved they would grant a role without
bwnsig the circumstaDees further stated.
Parjeant Mee said he wee not aware of any personal
sailar except a misunderstanding between him and •
learned friend as to • statement of fact.
The Lord Chief Justiee said that the granting of • rule
would probably lead to ► settlement.
Rule panted.

Wain.

This was so exonlination trieetinun the cue of the bank-
rupt, a butcher. of tioodge-street, Tottenham-court-road.
The bankruptcy was upon the petition of Kr. Simpson, a
builder, of Tottenhaincourt•roa& AIM a prior examina-
tion of the bankrupt it appeared he bed deposited the lease
of his premises with hie brother Frisk, who, he slimed, had
a claim against him.
An attorney's clerk stated that since the bankruptcy the
bankrupt had gone out of his mind, and was at present in
Yorkshire. No accounts had been filed.
An adjournment sine die was ordered.

This was se actioaa7rwrover Goes pease Kos for falai re-
pireshitios relative loth* .sitar y state. be., of • hoses
Vt Mlb...W.l4as' to the plaietiff.
Mr. Kits... sad Mr. Daley wens comma for the plantar ;
Kr. Zola Allinson sad Mr. :Salley were counsel for the
&fondest.
The complaint wee that the beam le cpasstioa wee sot
property &sisal. and that tbe °Maass small, aria there-
from bed • ...Ty WIDOW offset as the plsietire wife's
The defealsot her mg omitted to pep the water-rate, the
water Is. rut off. 110 the removal a she bitches door
• 0.n.0..n i,r, b dray was fraud opus is Noe& parts, sad
that oot run off. The miaow ells maw threstob
the rod. sad &united the piairWrogoola. There was aso

THE EXPRESS, FRIDAY EVENING, APRIL 18, 1882..:

the bank. The fact of her having in her pommies some et
the notes obtained by the forded cheque, even if reeved, KT
would go for nothing, there Wulf no such crime in law.
This had been settled by the decision of one of the judge,. •
Then, whet else could she be charged with
Mr. Mullen—We charge her with being aocessory to the IN
forpey; conspiring, in fact, with another not yet in endear, tM
to dispose of notes obtained by means of forgery.
Mr. Hall—l think the evidence of Miss Stephens, who
made herstatement very creditably,and that of Mr. Knight's um
assistant, ar.. sufficient to justify mein granting this remand; 100
besides which, there are the circumstances of her having
refused to state her address, after first giving a false one, 915
and endeavouring apparently to conceal her face from obeer
vat* while dealing with these none. ep
Mr. Lewis—She held her handkerchief to her face, as the lit,
witness stated, to allay the anguish of an aching tooth. 100
(Laughter.) 100
Mies Stephens—l said as if suffering pain. (Laughter.) Al.O
Mr. Lewis—Of course, if your worship thinks proper to
remand the prisoner, we are prepared fully to meet the To
charge, whatever it any be, against her, although at pre- ea,
sent I contend there is no evidence whatever to support the te
prosecution. 20
The prisoner was then remanded for • week.
eN

ii
9?
ion io o; "
a.
13e II

:. I 0

MTS.

ad *awes Illaswvese•
ld• Ben.Wid.4lo.lltidAl
ad Ds. do.
ledsbaldielbecial.
De. iselmis•
__. _ -

andarodby
100 Do. Idyl:" 41100.-
100 De. Joao 1011.
mul Osikattia•
18 Op, T.liDook

lest Imam
2 Do. 0. Extemodom

Ii

dam ♦ ow AL
0 D.. do. Lad do
all Do. do. B asp. du
all _ Do. do. Lad do

100t&Ands . ...... . ..
16 Do. Punisub
U 1 Do. do.
100 D0.10d.81.1r10t.g.4.6
1 Trinidad.llo2ll64B6rip

I 0

- I 0

tau
211 DO. 8 pow el ProL
AU Do.oor. Prate 0.01.11 e.
W D. 4 per rn eboat.
.01 Do. IPR 41. 1.1. • •
W Do. do. 1181
a/I Do. do. _
100 Oriel bam Poidavale
12 Do. Now
2 Do. Jemmy, lie
100 Q 4.1. cd=.4griaz
OlWeill
18 Ds. New
Dodp.oldo.poy7B,4r.op
W De. lie do.. 77.wit.00.
W Do. do. 18 withoutop.
all Dolep.elßda.,par.7B
100 Modrao Gum. 14 par at.
100 Do. do.
140 Do. Q per at.
MI Do. 6 per cent. do.
1M Yelb.Carp.6p, at.lioide
all N. Droevolek ,t Canada