The Express.
London, England, 1864-06-16 00:00:00

ELLIGENCE.
DAY.)

OF LORDS.
PPEALB.

MI r. TE.I.VIERTON.

renewed Wa.
argument foe %e
d repeated his that
t, which were relied on by the
she did not expect marriage from
• to enter into another kind at
fact and reality were directed
pectation of marriage, and dealt
arisen to interfere with that oost-
she believed their mutual/WWI
"ch were used by her with repel
ventionalities had reference, not
wed association, but to the desire
to join with her in rising above
abties as they exist in relation to
OA fortune and pecuniary mem*,
quire.' bow all the dilating on the
bore on the propositions in.
ly, the fact of a Scotch marriage
&ligation or connexion with that
the fact of an Irish marriage.

awl that in such an inquiry it
0,3 antecedents of the marriage
stsblish, and to show that the
anything in her relations with

d understand th►t the question
• e, but how did it bear on the
nation of the correspondenoe
e.

pressing his line of argument, was
tiog his position, and examined
in which the respondent dwelt on
t of the strength of hope and
woman's heart, and that be
and forget that he ever played
her experience could not tend to
coed, and if he became a batter
should not regret what it
then he came to the passage
t on by the other sides
to enter into other rel►tions
• I conclude you will not entertain
another which might gratify your
nscience—bat I have not the

not keep me in this death
tat once." This, it was urged,
the kind of marriage which Lad
k chapel, at Balaidava, by the

which
she could not consent;
hich would satisfy her conscience,
t ; and which might be nom.
hone to a public sad ordinary
radential reasons by the appeilant.
respondent she said, "1 am in a
same remedy will not avail me f
small--gleam of hope to which
it from rue, and that by no gently
continue the siege much
net either yield pnsoner il dime-
=l to doY Tell me. I think A
hat to do, I could and means and
was argued, was to be construed
ely that marriage only was
...

t she was yielding io the
private marriage. Subsequent
was too weak and help.
t proposition ; and was beginning
th of the obetaclee which stood
and avowed marriage for which
ling. As to the enrage on which
laid, and such an extraordinary
t by the other side—" Oh, I know
but I ainnot help it now, so tee
which it was suggested that thin
illicit cennexion ; it was simply
a knowledge of the strong
abandoned of her re:,
tbe understood in the seam
sense which he (the Attorney.
t it could bear until he had heard
He contended that the word was
rest sense, and implied an appeal
g, and pure sympathies of the
ent was applied by the learned
such as the, " We leave out
tea to us the ideal of happinees—
ostances, and take thinp as
os qu'ou aim% it taut earner ee
siguity vitiates can get We can.
but are we like other people that we
the same rule'" This must be

lag,
if not her assent, to that
pnvate, which the appellant
willing to eater into. A subsea.
letter ounfirmed this, for the said.
• state of perfection, but with
with a few cricks sad crooks. I
a you at (on& of your words at
s had • feeling that your fate awl
on must be oat of the beaten track
we mined get it straight would
7 it crooktd r There eau sot
. .

was Dot cosaistast with ibis

rod to such s marriage u clump-
attod, and with a hope sod belied
when, all obstacles removed, their
od mamas the chsruter whit*
.

mation of happiiens far lib.
had • reference to • sinful ear
for a time debarred from the °riff.
hich surround that state. Thin
y the fact that up to this
in the letters of the appellant
connexion. Much stress wee laid -
this phrase of the respondents
tde facto, what you would have
I am morally certain—that it wad
was obvious that the appellant se
t's meaning, for in • letter he
as on the point of leaving the
ce to a promise that they abonbi
scribes the eoeflict between hie
jodgmeut on • question which
e to which the respondent had
seated, and the result wee
o home by • circuitous routs
that they would meet at that
uduct led to the conclusion that
secret one, and that he was yet
not eves that course by his know.
ich existed to any marriage. Is
Hut, however, said that if they
p his mind u to what was to be
at is, a priest* marriage ; and
es, meant, it wm
tell the respondent to t7kthe
Bellamy, and take her advice. It
at he should ask a lady to refer
connexion to her own sister.
•og when our report left.]

:031 MON PLEAS.
3tiddlesex—(Edon Mr. Justice
a Special Jury.)

THOM*4) V. TBB MiIICKIS OF