The Express.
London, England, 1855-04-23 00:00:00

Lain intents:once.

imaroutax Ow= cams.
Mess ow aggablel tor the moat wok.
Wmoolss, IL 32ollalabuta.—Daawa Kr. P. Sayiry.—Turaby, ,
A; fil; W =
4114eltursdara.—babra y, 28; nift,
L. 27.
sor Kr. Ailaiplata.—itas. 1
dit arisr.--Salsra NA L. Misthit&—Tridan Apra SC
Ilaralawilsali.rerAL—KOßwo M. D. D.Haata.--Wolasa.
El , 17,W .77167 Thsmars .
of joimeni,hozo. *sag 117.
Mr. tiwysset IL O. Jaws.
—fiiiiirissi wideirropi Friday, r 7; Saturday, 117.
W77779oltasar. OiawarlsurL—WoWn Wt. 17717•114 Kaman.—
Taarda.• A.. ,
a
, ~: 2:64162br1 .s46B:LL
Bilks, "ogas Rada
1 gopiiilr,a tie VIO10••• ..
Ka1u717...irr.. !_,,,,---= NIL W7/70M Sicela-411.11317.
row ra.,, '
April 2.4; Betslitiali ..• _ idea Kr. O. (2172..•-17nesakiy,
SovrawAsa,
et .760.... comma
da gi "ea Kr. J. P. Tresr.—T°o-
di t ~osalltisti-ballatara Kr. E. Gamy.—
k\
WollIZ7:4111 II 1 Ibislair• le 1 ,27 ; Saturday, IL

COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH.—Apsu, 21.
moan LORD CAJOSILL. AIM INTIM 1111.1.
01011:11011.

ens ctOilit e. PPA2I.--Wita GA= LAWS.
This was • case sent teem seedeme fore l the
court on the question whether as fact law
vietion of the defendant under the foliomees.
The defendant, who carried a 014 Wee COS with his dog in
the day time, and was vendee elt the publle highway. The
dog ran in off the reed es the
lead .1
• Mr. er, a '
pheasant roes, crossed the reed, an was fired Bowtut I
effect by the defendant, who was subsequently (+barged
under the Game Act with having committed a trespass by
being on the highway in search of pale.
Mr. Curinetto. in support of the conviction, °outmoded
that the fain of the dog having bean on the land eanstituted
the off‘nce.
Mr. Dowdeswell, on behalf of the defendant, urged there
must be an entry on the land with intent to bill game, and
that the fact of a dog going on a man's land while his owner
was on the highway did not bring the ease within the statute.
Re put this ease. A man slight be on one piece of lent
and his two dogs on two other pines of land ; could be is
eonvicted of the three offense committed at sue and the
same time ?
Lord Campbell said the court was of opinion that the
conviction wee good. The 30th section of the I and 2 William
IV., e. 32, enacted that " If any person should commit
trespass by entering or being in the daytime on land in
search of game, such person should forfeit, &a" The in-
formation here charged that the appellant did commit the
menus by being in the daytime on certain land, the pro-
perty of George Bowyer, in search of game. The question
was, did the evidence support the charge ? He thought it
did, and that the magistrates were justified in coming to the
cos sinsiaa that the defendant had committed the offense.
The wenn= must accordingly be &Mean.
Judgment accordingly.
Aran. 20.
arms to lIMPOO.-7/17011 WAD OAMPINLIC.
ass MINN 111111r16
SAN, =LP. /Ws essomo
Cal 40111 X 5. CoOLL—PILIVRT.
Mr. Edwin James moved for a rule to show cause why
Ignatius Francis Coyle, who bad been found guilty on as
indictment for perjury, should not have • new trial on the
ground that since the trial evidence bad come to light which
would westabliA his innoesaa. The assigement=
jury was that he bad sworn he bad seen James
Alleyne and his brother Ale:ander IlGeathy Alleys*, ea
the 20th Mounter, 1846, at the Plough Hotel, Cheltenham,
this statement having been nude with the view of showing
the exhume of a cassquary to defraud Captain Robt. Blair
Kennedy out of • sum of 7,3001., the amount of •
bet on the perhemenes of a mare celled Pigeon,
to Janie Heider Alleyne. The *Haynes wen
We
eb= ea
_Orsylenfth
Align testimonyinane& him in , and subsequently
Alezener this
eon ibe perjury, when he was loan guilty and was un-
amen to two years' imprisonment, yid& he is sow suffer-
ing. The pressen appll..eeiss wee node =dee the following
°intimateness :—After the trial, ea letter was
written to Mr. James, the effect of ahMh was that two
gentlemen were present at the Plough Hata between the
26th and 30th of November, 1846, and there saw the
Allegan is oonvonation with Coyle, a feet which be had
sworn So,
_and which they had on his trial most positively
denied. Mr. James handed the letter to Ooyle's attorney,
who sent his managing clerk to Cheltenham, and he them
saw Mr. Price Lewis, a gentleman of great respectability,
and who bad formerly ban high sheriff of Cardiganshire,
who stated that during the period in question be wee at the
Plough Hotel with Captain riece,who was now in Australia,
when ha saw the All• vies and Coyle seated at a table In
conversation, and that Captain Price spoke to Mr.
Alleys* and cautioned him as to Coyle's ehanater,
when Alleyne replied he had known him for some
time, and he was most upright in his dealings. The clerk
informed Mr. Lewis that ha would draw out an affidavit se
the effect of what he had stated for him to sign, but that
gentians Muni to Nuke it, ei ha did set think it wend
hare besalSese Neale den, as he had nobody to Ow
arm kin amble should have been whiny 1
to have given endows at the trial if he had below=
on to do so.
Their lordships, under these eirenfatenoss, greeted the
rule alai.
Rule accordingly.
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS.—APRIL 21.

NIS IS BANCIO.-1111011 COW :urn= /11LTIS. 111. 'MICE
11111WILI, 1111. /OPTICS WILLIAM, MID XL /UST= •1101/Dll4
(ITT V. THE ORIENTAL £I(D PENINSULAR STEAM
NAVIGATION CONPANT.—NEW TRIAL.
_ .

-----
This cue was tried so long ago u the 23rd of December,
1847, and at the trial it mu arranged that the defendants
should be at liberty to tender a bill of exceptions, lf nicer
awry, after a motion for a new trial, upon the ground of
misdirection, had been disposed of. The motion for a new
trial was made, and the ride was diseaarged on the 6th of
December, 1848 ; and after some delay a bill of eseepticas
was settled by the amuse' and sent to Lord Truro, who bad
fa the meantime become Lord Chancellor to ;sal. He,
however, did not eppreve of the form of the et easaptlecia,
and he said he would settle it himself. Vide= oplimenal
were made to him, but hb eagegemead ponsallel Aim *es
attending to the matter, and in newer be as
which had been recently made is his simnissy, tM
had been informed that his lordship's state of heal:etre
such that it wee desirable that he should not be further

troubled with the matter.
lir. Petersdorlf, uadsr them eirmunstanees, moved that
the plaintiff might be at liberty to issue execution, or that
there should be a new trial, and he submitted to their lord-
ship* that it was only right that such a rale should be
granted, es the failure to tender a bill of exceptions had not
arises ken any fault of the parties, bat from dream-
steams over which they had no control.
Ms. Panties showed ewe against the rale in the Ant
iselook
The met thought that an arrangement having failed
widows task es either side, each arrangement ought to be
tressed es isigaratire, and that the matter ought to be
remitted beak to the point at which the bite& occurred, and
that thine eierald be a rale absolute for a now trial.

Rule obsolete.
101311TIALL V. 111•CON.—DITITILTION 07 101017. Y.
The plehttiff in this cue sued the defendant aa the maker
of a promissory note for 991.105., and at the trial the quie-
tists was raised whether the note was signed by the de-
fendant or whether it was a forgery. The didadest was
oohed, and be stated that he had given a yeeenimery spiel
for 991. 10s. to Mr. Spearman, an anatisamr, es as amen-
deeds* fee with his son. That note wee** sew as the
eau
WS seed eises. except that it contained • eendiffes that WI
sisembl be paid sea oertain day, and the Wedge emseertain
ether day, whilst the note seed on coshieol se sedi MS.
Mee, bat was payable ea demand. Be had geld MK off
the wrewJasser note which be had gives, sod Ile aeM seed
es here a Neap for that amount. It was ieggeoteg tkat
She euebabllloy was that Mr. Spearman befog as west of
maim- Mimi the malt ths essildta width wield
be is ebsteile le he . wedl had ti dlstonsted
IL Illtenetts woe mg tbs. was
es= *as
leaggdogo tipsters to the soli wiee is die de
thejory deleenies the natter
bylbeilkg—s—Vaellse few the dedandeaL We. vas
away,oot et the trial, and it wen Mated 11=gens
a sabedy Mew when. Be leggewed. hiseorree. to see
a report el Ss owe he the eel no hand that
Imgmy led been bopstod Or Ids. nested
• lelfat to be written stating that the seed lapis wss
the sae whisk was signed by the deilmelkod. rod that he wee
wan to ems forward and peeve Ile rat. Vador then
deessideness the plaintiff obealowl a tole ihr a sew
owes the gonads that the waist wet ftitrit the weight of
•Wasars. and the abesse• el a mailiwki 'item; sod this
side=v en sees eases Wog thew against it him
wale
_7le. Iledesat Dyke appeared to show ewe. sad Mr.
Wee la support Ike rale.
The Celan was of opinion that the vardlet is this MO
ins set at all a eadsfeetory one, and that there ought to be
111 SOW trial.
Sale absolute.
sums AT 1r-

IV lIIDDIJIMI-IZIPCSI :10. :van
AND ♦ COMM /VIT.

11/2TOII g.

1111. WET 007EPANY.-

AOOIDISIT AT

I'M pidatiff is thie one is • naval and milintry taller,
la Uppsr Berkelopokeet, Pertain-square, sad ca the 14th
Novecalme last he took • MSS te Baia* sal book to
Denim He Wilma at 4 Ale*. sal fahadies ei seise
by the TA hale, he ants& at the Sawa status swe
ointeeldese Setting, wits be hoed the be deem
sad the Vela time. Ka beelessd to mem the Ilse la saws
to get isSe the tesia, bat be Wend he way, sad rat
far elms the Itm, sad nate lamMest with a Mai
Qs fell silk nab kegs thes be leaked Ws allow se badly
that hi was nth. dessert beads ha a week to is days,
sad wee pre heat seleadha M bls bashes he mealy
three Inas.
The
is
ens was, that ths aseideat eras teased by
the Wain Valated. sad Sat than was
ass thus II& esee‘a, it was am, wee ahem by the hat
ties Sashed hope" bad else less put ap.
The dehadeale awe we% *et time erne Taft ease* Ise
east* she seed erlasfy ewe ; that the WWI woe
mimed that he avid are P the 4,47 be mu OS
Sat be sea beedheirelsaa, aad se tbe
Ikehastllfikhe sad Ur. Mad Se
IM Kr. Who, Q.ll, sad Sr. fir the
TM jam data. =dist he the pgatifFdealsre"