The Express.
London, England, 1855-05-15 00:00:00

Ztt 4fint%.

pronteded to read extracts (tom documents (which the right
his. geatleman said he bad eerm mos of Lord Palmerston
to de), describing the formal official appointment of Admiral
Bearer, end the instructioes he posited whoa he west out
Must under Admiral Dundee. The responsibility of affairs
kabob harbour at Balaklava was entirely loader Admiral
lien as, as well as evarytniopt relating to the transport on
Ile Black Sea, entirely under his control. Be (Sir J.
graham) appointed Captain Christie on Captain Milers'
recomm- edition, as an officer of great sod, ability,
and experience', and fr ,m his naval reputation when
with Sit G. Collier on the coast of Attics ; but Captaia
Christie bad no power wit in the harbour of Balaklava at
all, as there was always a naval hubour-master there, and
Captain Cbrioxie was in no respect is the slightest degree
responsible for the state of the harbour, which he (Sir J.
Graham) a' mated was in a state of grust disorder and DUD.
futon. Captain Christie, he regretted to say, made two
seistakes—one in allowing the Prince to remain outside the
harbour, and another in ordering a transport with Turkish
troops to come to Balaklava Matted of Eapatoria, and for
this the Admiralty had ordered him to be tried by a court-
martial, and Ise believed that Captain Christie, in conse-
quence, was almost a broken-hearted man. The committee
had been told, end told truly, that Balaklava harbour was
more f • often time • harbour, and it was quite incapable
of containing the immense num her of ships that wanted
to discharge their asrgoes there. The admission, or refusal of
admission of the Prince into the harbour, rested entirely with
the officer in consalano of the harbour, and not with Captain
Christie, who was in no respect uspoosiblie for her lose, and
if the naval officer in command would not allow the Prince
to go in, Captain Christie was not responsible for the coo-
eequencee, the naval officer being supreme in the harbour.
The gale before the catastrophe was tremendously strong,
and such was the swell that it was difficult fur a long ship
like the Prince to set either in or out. although it waa raid
that the Agamemnon got out the night before. Doubtless
it was an indiperstion to allow a vessel to remain at anchor
on a lee shore, hut there were many other vessels in the
same situation, though it was undue:mil there should be
no genet.' movement of the transports without the con-
currants of Lord Raglan ; and:the naval officer commanding
the transports at Balekleva exercised supreme responsibility
without reference to tee Admiralty. Ile did not know that
Admiral Dudes was ever in Balaklava harbour. The Ad-
miralty had not nutted any official complaints of Admiral
Boxer before his removal from the Boophorns to Balaklava,
when operations on the landiog of the troops in the Crimea
were, it you'd be remembered, swollen to very great mag-
nitude. In justice to Admiral Boxer, he might mention.
that on one occasion be represented to the Admiralty the ne-
cessity for having a receiving ship at Constantinople, and the
unmet at first sent out vets that it was not thought neces-
sary, though he (Sir James Graham) reconsidered the
question; ad, finding the emergency of the service
ia-
greasing, he ordered a depot ship to be seat is
oe:ober. Sir James Otabant, having received the official
correspondence On Ito subject, proceeded to say that le
bad ant been officially notified to the Admiralty that then
war any defect in the transport service in the Blank Sea, axe
was he (Sir Jams') aware of it. lie was strongly ni opiates
that it would have been impossible for the transports W
have beea kept oonttnuall mediating between Bsisklave
and stations in the Black Sea, bath on military and naval
grounds, and is a care where the army was is constant
motion. It was a oifferent thing with the Duke of Wel-
lington at Torres Vodras, where he had the Tagus for
transport and the c ty of Litton for • vote:house ; but in
the Crimea, Lord Raglan, instead of the Togas, bad only a
ereek, and Batakleve ins aid of Lisbon for a store-house,
and • naked shore, without buildings or stores; a greater
pert of the transports themselves being used for that

purpose.
Tin Chairman—But then Wellington was Bethel head elf
a retreating instead of an advancing army. laugh.)
Sir J Graham—The amount of naval transport wen
limited at first, it listing a. ant bee. cosvituted with a
view only to operations in 13alearis and Lithuank• The
supply was limited out then"; but if he were asked es
to its supply "here.' he would 64y that you might get it as
you would a cab off the stand. (A laugh.) As regarded
the statement that el. the transports sere taken by the
troops that were intended for the sick and wounded, he
would state that there were difficulties connected with this
matter the committee could blindly conceive, when
they considered that in the coarse of the year the
transport service moved over a range of 3,000 miles of
ciente, 60,000 British moos, 6.000 horses, from 26.000
to 30.000 men from Marseilles to the CrMea, sod 12.000
men to the Baltic. end 45,000 Turk% so that in the common(
tie year 'bey moved an esoregete et ...in,. 150,000 men, and
were sending oat week by week 1,250.0001b5. of biscuit,
50,000 gallons of rem, 2.500 tons of salt meat and sugar,
and a perprually B.wieg quantity of 10,000 tons of coals.
The Chairman—Acknowledging that your operations
Mereemnpendons, could not a suffixiency of transport be
Mad ?
Sir J. Graham—We 'zoned nunelvos to the utmost, sad
'shouted every means available for tho purpose. No re-
qpidel'ions were made to the Admiralty when the army first
lewd as fir land transports. The government knew the
=tithe army to be sent out, and were guided is its
MI reference to the means a: its disposal on send-
71si illenemy
almirman—Leaving the lend transport behind ?
Sir J. Graham was mit aware that they did this—not the
whole of it. They took out what was sufficient. Instead
of floating hospital., he (Sir J. Grab to) wished to have
flied ones, and generally De gave his advice against fl luting
hospitals. They had two line of battle ships for fleeting
hospitals, though experience went to show that fixed hospi-
tals were far better than II oiling ones. Represen•stiens
being made by Admiral liaise that considerable esti
faring erne' fr dit the want of them, two ships were
appropriated for the sick arid wounded, with hammocks
and blankets. Upon this matter he (Sir James Graham)
addressed a private letter to Admiral Dundee, but he bad
since made the letter a public one, and read it. It set forth
that he had received arressing seviants as to the state Of
the sick and wounded after the battle of Balaklave, sad I
that they had to he einharked tiros the beach, and that
they had been put in ships imperfectly prepared end badly
ventilated. The wore hospital on shore was preferable to I
the beet ship all iat. If Sebastopol fell into the hands of
the Allies b .tab naval and military heepitals would have to
be estabti bed for the sick and wounded, and be (Sir James
Graham) differed that two or three large steam transports
should be filed up as hospitals without delay. He
(Sir James Graham), however, ex7ressed a hope to
the admiral that tne fall of Selo istopol, and the
kali of the Allies on the southern part of
ibe Wm*, would supersede the necessity for this, but in
OM of inexpeete f • cogency this provision had better be
Made. This letter to &mint Ducidas was a private
letter, in cone :too with tne public service; and if this
principle were not permi•ted in public depertments, he was
depiaies that it would d struy ill freedom of COMICIUDICS-
dna Admits! Dundee might shield loused under cover of
enffilligangennieetien bring private, but he (S.r J. Ura•
We) thought that a man of hie honourable character im uld
out, He, as First Lord of the Admiralty, had the power
of dastverting a private into a public communication, and
*MINA long been the practice of the Admiralty. He
seek' make Admiral Du, dais responsible for non-obeyaneel
of these inetructione, though communicated in • private
letter, though be (Sir J.Grahane), as First Lord,wu mainly
resposaible in the wetter.
Mr. Layerd—ire these private latten copied and Teem
Mad at the Admiralty?
Sir J. Graham—No; they regatta the private property of ,1
the person wile writes them.
Mr. Layersi—loppeee the letter was burnt, mislaid, or ;
NM, who would be responsible if the orders were'
myriad eat t
Sir J. Graham—l should be ; the responsibility soeld fell
es ; sad if the orders were not carried oat, I should die•
miss the party who di.obeyed them from his office. It was
• rule that the parson removing these private and conliden
Mal letters eeuM mewl* them public without the sanction I
Beebe writer.
Te General Peel—Lord Raglan had the supreme power
ewer the isevessects of the transports, and had • veto over
the dimities. et Admiral Dundee
To Lord Seymour—The officer commanding in the Bin
phorue would be answerable, if there bad been a short sup-
ply of heat there for the landing of the sick and wounded,
but subject always to the instructions of the admiral cam •
mending in chief.
Witness then, at his own retreat, read and put in two
eghial despatches, written by him 'rem the Admiralty, on
ins Wh November and the 18th of December, urging on
Admiral Dundee and Sir E Lyons the necessity of their
using the utmost exertions to improve the state of the I
harbour at Balaklave. and to Make proeer arrangemeate
for facilitstieg the landing end homing the army stores
there.
By Mr. Reebnek—He had reeeived no official complaint
whatever of the oondret of Admiral Boxer; and thinking
bah • gm equal to cope eueceastwly with the difficulties
emmedgfeell with the harbour of Balaktava, he (witness)
MOM him up there.
whim at this point ezorissed a wish teresd en extract
kegs what he called a secret and e letter which
be wow. to Sir Edmund Lyons oa the 4th of Jrnuary last,
stating, at the same time, hat the remainder of the letter he
was net at liberty to read. He added that he bad Lord
Palnessuma's permission to read the 'street in question.
I Toe manesittee gave the r. gslred permission, and Sir James
Graham m 4 it, as full "Fur the adequate per-
forming.' et the duties of the e 'amend at Balaklava and
Oweeeellthaep:e their lordships he Lords of the Admiralty)
segesd yes as responsible. You are invered with supreme
; you have ample mesas at your (Hope's' ; and, in
the just eureka of your power, you may rely on the sup-
porta their lordships. But the safety and honour of the
NAM a.etetske, and each officer under you must do his
air via 'soft* energy sad activity."
Is reply te Lend Seymour, Sir James said—With respect
WSW slek end trensded, the eimatture would bear in mind
eliffriAllgarktaltithat oat of an army so limited in num-
ber warprari army 13,1300 sea September moved
mesemiell hem the Srd of to the
Mk ell Pe last. samber which it was im-
pale/ tee
provide fig under the Pr-
illaman. la ramose be the skip Pases, she

LONDON, TUESDAY EVENIN4,I_. MAY 15. 1855.

ailed • a tlie IGth of trctotoir, and besides haying on beard
the 46th &giant, her eargoineluded 35.700 woollen sock',
63,000 woollen frocks, 17,000 woollen drawer', 2,500 watch
emu, 16,100 blankets and 13,700 rage ; and his belies was
that if she had not been lost we should never have beard of
the want of warm clothing in the Crimea If Csptsia
Milne could have been spared to devote himself exeluively
to the tramspott service, that would have been better than
say port board that could have been constructed ; but
it was impossible to spare Captain Milne from the g I
service of the Admiralty without creating a sew Lord of
the Admiralty, which would have violated as act of pubs.
went. To avoid that, and at the same time to secure the
services of Captain Miioe, both in tbe general businue ot
the Admiralty and in reference to transports, he established
the its/import board. lie thought the eshigestion of the
Duke of Newcastle before the committee, that the Memnon
service should he placed under the direction of the Minister
for War, would have led to great confusion, iiimothcb as -
that was a service essentially naval, and which it required
naval men to manage.
Befog asked a question as to the blockade estab:ished is 11
the Black Sao, Syr James proceeded to read several official 11
despatches written by him to Admiral Duoiee, ranging ri;
over a period *vending from the sth April, 1851, till the n.
end of the year, complaining that the blocked• had not been Z
carried on in a satisfactory or effective manner, urging the so
admiral to c.didact it in the strictest sad most vigorous way, 20
and for that purpose investing him with the largest dims- Se
tie's. He remerkeu, whilst reading these &spuds's, that U
it was contemplated at one time by Admiral Dundee and le
Admiral Hamelin to stop the oakum or trading 'auk into so
the Stalk Sea at the mouth of the Bosphorus; bat that pro- et,
noeition was considered inconsistent with the law of nations, SS
and was therefore not carried into effect. at.
To Mr Layard—The blockade was not carried on to the 11,-
oatisfutiou ot the Admiralty ; but Admiral Donde, 'russet ly
wholly to blame, tor it was considered as a joint operation. a,
Mr. Layard—With regard to the Greek merchants, did It.
not the IS h merchants make • representation that, in con- as.
sequence of the want of a blockade, their trade was ruined
there ? a.
Sir .1. Graham—No doubt the delay in the blockade was
attended with great inconvenience to the mitreantile into. et.
rests and with great evils to the operations of the war; but So
the difficulty was very great by the naval farce being occu let
-
pied in the movement ot troops to a large extent, the loi
French bringing up reinforcements end the English moving t,4„
the Turkish army. Therefore the Balls upon the naval ?
service were vary great. Wnether there were meths of iii
carrying throe orders into es•eution is doubtful ; and etc., at.
'Maly lam not prepared to "lame Admiral Dundaa, though et
I much regret that, the means should have been waning, sy
and that the urgencies of the occasion ebsuld have preventea
an efficient blockade.
Mr. Layard—l mintiest the Greek merchants bad some 'al.
mesas of knowing the blockade could not be carried out, as Se
they did not suspend their trade also I ss
Sir J. Graham (significantly)—ls that a question ?
Mr. Lavern—Yee.
Sir J Graham—The member is probably better in- .22
et,
formed on that point than I am.
To another question from Mr. Layard, Sir James stated 59.,
that the mouths of the Danube were blockaded at one time, "
but the blockade had been raised. tan
In reply tit an interrogatory from Lord Seymour, as to st
what his opinion was of the force in the Crimea when the to
expeditioa went out,
Sir James Graham said—lnstead of an opinion I will give 1,,
you • fact. In the last week of July I saw a Crimean en- z
thority, who of course must be nameless, woo hid left the a
Crimea in the month of June. I saw him at the Admiralty s
and I examined him myself. Au officer of the Admiralty
wee in attend .no. on me, and took down his statement in et. I
writing. That statement was circumstantial and full, and
gave a complete account of the Crimea. Toe Russian force 4
in the Crimea was estimated by him at 70.000-8,000 of ~,
which were cavalry ; 40,000 of which corodituted the Earn- so
son in Sebastopol and the remaining 30,000 were dispersed 10
throughout the Crimea. I sent that informs:Son to As.
miral Dead.* on the 29th of July. and I directed him to f,),
give a copy of it to Lord Ra.lan. It must have
rat
been theeivtd by Admiral Dead's before the euseditira
suited from Varna. My informant was a mint intelligent at.
man. I had the utmost reliance on his statement, and 10
'obsequies% events have proved that his estimate ot the force at.
in the Crimea at that time was accurate, within a few thou-
sand men. Mort than that—that iadividual himself fol. 6,
lowed the informattha I Pent, and had personal communal-
math sues Lea Raieliso. a salve personal
will nor
ere.- rile farther on that point; but I have conferred with lel
the Sur of the Admiralty who took down that statement, 26
and I am verified by hint. se
To G I Peel—The difficulty was immense of obtain- ,o
kg any information on the subject in the East. The whole so
information 'he governmeat obtained has been here, to
and all the information on which say reliance could be 10
placed has been transmitted to the seat of war. But that is
sot all. Immediately on the dee station of war I sent fur
an engineer who was employed in ono of the Queen's ships
on the home cation, who had been engineer in a packet.
boat plying between Sebastopol and smother port in the ot.l
Black Sea fur four year., and who knew the harbour of Se- Vi•
bastopol al well as the commander of a Hyde steam packet ant
knows Spithead. I heard his statement, a- d I also sent
that to Admiral Dundu at the breaking out of the war 41
Again, in the autumn of last year, with reference to the to
Danube, I tent as engineer who baboon employed by th.
Russian government—an Englishman—and who hoew et
every shoal, every battery, and every impediment in the.
ti
To ver. 10
Lord Seymour—From the Ist of January, 1853. so
until I left the Admiralty in March last, I was not at me at,
own reentry realistic* daring the whole of that time S
Daring the legit summer I went on urgent business to Ply. Ifs
mouth and Portsmouth ; and I believe I was been, "•
fr ma the Admir.lty, with one exception, on the arrival of a
mail from the East. I went also with her Majesty to Bal se,
moral, and both ongoing there and returning to Louden 1 le
pained usythome without visiting it. Se
In answer to anot.er question from Lord Seymour, Si, :IL
June's id that in 1628 the Board of Ordnance was Gout
deed by all the leading men in the country of the day s
Perfect model of a government establishment. It was thou (0
fresh from the hands of the Duke of Wellington and Si, to
Henry Hardiage. tr,.
To General Peel—Siam the war broke out the (Winne: a
department bad completed and cent out several siege train- eo
in the most rapid succession ; and, noterithatanding the un. le
exampled character of the present expedition, it had neve 4.,
been delayed a day by the wait of its armament from lb. ;lc
Ordnance. in
To Mr. Layard—He believed there was not in history at
example of es successful and complete a landing as the, 141
which was effected by the English army in the Crimea. TM t
operation was performed by Admiral Dundee and Sir E 4„,
Leone with • promptitude end sees' which were above a J.«,
praise. He should think that the Beet was reedy to soy fat
the army to tee Crimea from Varna by the third week ii e
August. The g .vornment gave the order for the operation do
but contingent upon the knowledge of Lord R iglan of th•
mesas at hie devout for effecting it. He had no don.,
there were sufficient means tarnished for the operation o Z.
entharking and landing the troops; but they might not Awe 1,
been the best means. Nor did be doubt that the ezpiedi
ti .n sailed in the very best time of the year, September an. .24
O totter being the two months in the year of all others It. * I
le I
which the Black era wee the limetiubject to storm..
Layard farther asked if Admiral Dundee received ,
any aseistanee from the English ambassador at Chasten. sj
tinoplo ? to
Sir James Graham said be was not aware that the sambas i. 6,6
sailor failed is his duty to render every a/datums fa hit
power. so
Mr. Ltyard—Was the public service interfered with ?
Sir James Graham said if the gentian implied that the
Public service was damnified by the nature of the enemy
nications between the admiral and the ambassador, he could
not out his finger on an instance in which it was.
Mr. Rierboek--Was there any difference of opinion be- is
tween the two ?
Sir J sows Graham raid he had no doubt there wee, hie 10
he could not say whether it came officially under his notice to
To Mr. Layard—He could not say that a misundentand.
ins between two such important functionaries as the admi
rat and the ambassador would not produce an unfavourable ee
effect on the public enrolee.
Mr. Layard—Did tee Turkish Admiral propose to take • lee
Turkish Stet to the Circamita coast?
Sir J. Graham said he believed be did, but afterthe ex
perience of Sinop' it was considered a mos: euingerous ope-
ratios if he had gone aloes. toe
Mr. Lulled asked by whom it wee so eousidered ?
Graham Paid, by the common sense of every poison 99
in Tel key. (A laugh)
To Mr. Layard—Previous to December 1851 it was tea • as
known in this onsiatry and at Constantinople that there was s
a road from the interior of Russia to the Crimea, 40 miles to
to the east of Pi rekso. It was impossible to blocks,' the 4
Sean Asaff for wasted suitable vessels. Soe
The Chairman intimated to Sir J. Graham that the com-
ke
mitt.. had no more questions took him. ns
The right bola. baronet then retired, and the committee mm
adjourned until this day. 694
100

SHAZ 8 L 15.13.

- 0+ -

all De. f Nuns,
100
1011 Do. Bina. and Derby
all NW O. Mast Om)
214 Mao Half Shares
rll Norwortis sad Corlial• -
2/4 ‘eirporuibero.kti?.robrd
. .

Tad MILLENNIUM.—Yesterday, s " Cons r
Totowa" was meld at Bt. Martin'teh U. easier the baseless pi
or Mr. Robert Owen, to inaugurate the millessium. Mr. 10
Owen once mere explained the principles which, is his to
sew world, were to settare, " without money and without 16
pries., to every man everything the heart could desire is Ira
superfluity." At the close of hi address, the marbire, to
called "The Devaitator "—or rather, a pictorial re-repeats- py
Son of it, was exhibited, making terrible havoc smog the te
Ree,imas at Sebastopol. A petition to both bosses of per- 10
liantent, prsyieg that steps Nairn be taken to carry out Mr. 10
04/116.6 scheme, was adopted, and the sating separated.
Mr. Owen yesterday completed his 86th year, sod, is the
rearm of his sedum, pained his audience with the prophecy go
that he should die be.ore another birthday, his mission 10
nearly fulfilled.
LATSTAL PALACL--SBII.LING DAT.—MAT 14. 1:1
imbibes ea (*meet, 2,286; ditto by seams baste, N
48,—Taal, MOS.

24 &3
674 7:f
40 42

MMES.
Arua hia
TAn{N Au...wawa (kW
"Anglo Canning's
♦ •nMn.laylan
?Amara=

100,000 1
40,000 1
100,000 IN
10,000 11
now 20
00,000 1
6,000 00
0,000 90
10.°001
6,000. 30
11,6001 20
210 0001 1
6464..
i2.ooui 40
10,00 t 5
ii(1,14.011
0,000.1 25
70,000.
25.000 2
100,000 1
11,000 00
72,000 1
11,000 4*
60,000 i 1
10,000, 11
5,00 u, .
10,000:
10: 1
60,0 0 1
40,000 1
)30 000 1
, ,
100,000
00,00' 1
!Now! IS

THIS DAY.—Two "tom
The railway share market tads' u generally
steady, at yesterday's advance. Lonaoi: and North-
Western stock is quoted 99 to 3 ; Great 111'24srs. 641
to 65; Midland, 70 to 3; South-Easters*. ibi to I 1
Caledonians, 301 to I; and Great Northern, 221
to 23.1.
French shares are dull. Northern. are quoted 34i
to 33; Eastern., 34; to 35; and Paris and Lyons,
24; to Z prem.

Arettalum
nlrmeavor Iron at Cool
+Britton Iron
rfirsa.lmo.urrAtitams
Do. COMM rad Chtlslni
_ Do. qt. Join Del limy'

le.en.,Jaak.
Cobre Copper.-- .........
. _

eCuu.nuti Lold .
tUupper Miners of Egg
rDo. Pref. Tj per Cm
rEer.hcAuWalW:oppr
t. .91.1.111.1.
Grp*, Nugget Vela leg.
tOeus.'st
Gmg :loeby et wee.
Greet Pu.gootb
.I..lberty ..
iiilnart.
_

• Do. B.
Lasitagthus
04ar1quita ••
New China&
*N.l.lnar ie. eis.Cl

I it7t-eit,lTpT - -

Isth)autry Iroa
1+1)o. New

7,uoti

I I
T i
r 14

4 6
II 7
24 3f
24 3
it SS

i i
I 8 di&
84 $$

131 311
3l 4.1
!Ha pa

Par Pal
Ile

i i
7 le
1 2i ow
I I Pa
I I

, 4 , lat tftl
iga st
a 6

'Santiago de Cuba l2 61
iiroir&notrtrallas
s I a
litUalted Nei** all 51 81
iWaller
West Marilynn all
$ Transferals* by stunned died.

4giiii
ro.oool

JOINT STUCK.

241
701 291

'Si 0

U
Li 1

. ..... „.. .....
rettit.CoLliank&Loan Co.
British North Amatiesa
Charupred Bank of Ada
Chart Bank or rub',
nostralia, and China_
°Modal

si la

Cutomtreialor Lcadac...
gair.,tical.,&
lon.Cliart.Brak of MAL

-
IMtm New
Landau and County
Landes J.•tet Mock
Laudon and %yestnalas!e

BANKS.
80 II

I Oi d:p
1 04 dIP

II 14
2:11 II

Sat. Croy. of i;eglead
Do. New . .
National. oiTtNea
New Booth Wiles ____
Orient. DNA Corporation
Proeutetalotlrelsad
Do. New
_

U $4
39 41

a;iWiurrtralian Bank-
ing and Gold Imp. 0o
South Australia
Union at Australia
Do. Now

'll II
Te 84

1 Unice at Load= ....

MISCKLLAt.4

110,00 113
IA 180AraNta 2-'-'115A01.1 1
15,500 Arersillm . Mitt .
/0,000 10 usizallea and
115,000 10,11edla eaalowlewelte
60,11eldoleMeetwalawd 1
50,000 5: flettl2oeLllon & Bod. Co.
8,915! 100 ........
I at. ;478FartA.,hulazailni'l!
280,000 SL Falun
20,000' 1; Pwlerowoo
110,0061 4;C:erten Nome newton
60,00, 1 'Dooton Imo 0r.........
20,0004 20 &now &won
10,000' 25 Electric Telegraph
10,000 Ib, General Btra. Nangatioa
201)oween8.8.8hIppluit Co. ,
10! Wotan ranter Elect.rel.
10151elleas A at.Amerieao
1;Nallowal Patztlits.Pool
101Netherlatto Lewd
2 11. S. Aldan Coal& Imer
SUM Nanittlow
1 North Belt. Atomisation
20 Nordi of Name thaw
S VoelltherLandallarwal
50 pasiewlk Offend Mena!
601 Do New - .. . I
21Pordtad 15m.........
10,0,,3m0nigh.11"44•10.. •• •••I
tune. Wade..
11 Do. New
23,Souta tat/ad= Land
1 4atesezine Their. ecrip '
1 Do. Do. Resi.t. Teo
20 erootettotoCo.of Ctn ;
1011,Vait Dlostat's Lead

-119 $L

31 $ die

110 116
toy 110
si at
i I Pm

I 6 17

10,0001
WO9
*IIOO
MVP° 1

iSi 7

I

les,s7l
moat
130,000
30,0001
2
"ow
14.640
secsees
100,000
IVO°
71000
75.0001
26.000
10.000,

Ths following are this day's salts for the amount :
ORDINARY 811ARE8 AND STOCKS.
Caledook.n. 'l4; Eastern Cr:metier, 114; Gee t Northern. 914; do.
A, Mock. 7a; Gre it Western. t;5; ',undo., and North-Western. 99 1 1
Midland, , Norfolk. 494; North lirldsh, 29, North liastons
Beranek, 72k; do. Litman:A, t 24; South.E.a-tern, 6011; South
Walt., 25; tale of :oath, 11. We•deornw 111, 71.
PREPERE•CE allA ItY.S.
Chesser end llolyheud, Preference, No. a, 61; Groat Northern,
1164; Ink Land, 5!. Reefers** 4 per rat., 14.
FOttkluN.
Great Luxembourg (Constituted Shares), 2; Great Western of
Canada Shares, 211
lilloll.ll

Brorilian Imperial (limed at 0. pm.), 21; ditto Comm and Cana.%
.21. United Mexican, Si
JOINT STOCK BANKS.
London Marlene Bank of Australia, .e 1 ; Provincial of Ireland,
New, 2 l; Cn.on u: Australia, 71.
MISCELLANEOUS.
Ao-.rattan Arianliars!, 291; Berlin Water Works, 4; Crystal
Palace. 4; North Edwin Australasian, j.