The Express.
London, England, 1863-11-18 00:00:00

COURT OF PROBATE AND DIVORCE.

Nov. 17.
(Before the Jody Ordliary.)
10 LIT O. (OWLET.

This wan the cue wkish has bees so often before the
coast. It was a petition for • dissolution on the ground of
the husband's alleged adultery and cruelty. Oa the 12th
of March, 1860, the snit came on for trial, bat a compro-
mise was effected—as Mrs. Rowley contended, without her
comment —by which the jury was dismissed without hearing
the amuse. The petition' had since bees aseesdad, and
now included only acts of adultery, which wore add to have
bees committed before the 12th of March, 18e0, bat which
had not tome to her knowledge before that date, as well as
similar acts committed since the agreement. There were
abo elleptione of cruelty during We robehhatios, which
had ceased so long ago as 1864.
Dr. Bushey, on behalf of the nmpowdeet, sew moved to
strike out the remaining datum or to dismks the petittos
el
ether, cootencti that she agreement horrid the right
of the wife to any further. Although it seas quite
to as that DM to—nastier vostai—might be added to
the pleadlmp der* thepeedeeey of a suit, he dialed that
Mrs. Rowley had say right to revive the premed litigatios
after it had once been •sed. As to the other acts com-
plained of, he contended that the wife bad booed herself
by the terms of the agreement to take DO sew proemdisp
whatever the conduct of her hothead might be.
Mr. Kerslake, Q.C., oa the other aide, remindedthe court
that the respoodeat had setsally put in an answer rabbi
the brae, what effect the speomeat ought to have? A.
te the soden that a wife amid give a husband thews to
commit adultery, be denied that she seek* ester iato say
valid maraca of the kind. _ _ . _

sir J. iiiidoaTbat 'Rigid be, aid yet r wife sii M bar
bar right to mond for • divans by baring Omani at boo
hotbaixt's soistooduot. • • _
_ _

Mr. Kankke—ht aD mete, helm the mart °Mild held
that thenthed brow oranteanee it would have to be latided
&I to what was purls' in the minds of the parties whoa the
arrangement was entered into. Wm. Rowley deeded that
she had tionoseted to it at all ; meth km would ehe ever
have aoamated te
~ ere bar husband a lioness to live as he
pima
Dr. Trlalrma toildwodbwthe same side.
Sir J. Wilde took thee to oomider.
0111101 Vi v. 01111011611 AND TWITELLL —A OILIVAPOZ.

mese wen was sidis, sod tis judge bed made sa ardor
absasters to 'Yoh sole for
tios Sill di! I=72ller• bed MshessaTra.

iir7epiaci-Zititha7;j4—i;;WhZ.ii;;;i7rpor-
Hameln a wifs Gould sot obtain a jading segaratiss, even
if she proved her case is sawn to her lisebtats sat ;
neither could she give evident* of enmity et dserhies oz.
ceps on her owe petition. Sir 0. Oresswell intl. Yenta%
✓? ways tried erne suits esparet, iisehning to is-
terfere is the order in which the ails stood
on the paper. In the ors of " Hepworth v. Hepworth and
Gibson the heehaw' hoes prensted for o keg tire
from having his owes breed, teams his wife hod Mid a•
oron sawn, sod he mold sot /myth, sea whisk ho Whets
ordered to hod his wife for the eon, in Yo two vita Hr.
Hepworth hod her • onassitted for nestinsinest of tin
=sad of arrears of alimony, sad Ind bees tmeapiehely

Ills J. Wilde—lfbat a wow of bottiold, t I abdl doom*
bow to the authority of the wart, if may relate at the wab
jest, bat I AO do mood& groat relooloato; for it b &pod
plenum to o Mahood to Iwo two mho pen as ids by
aide, whoa tabotaatiolly t►e rag tools us tubed is both.