The Express.
London, England, 1862-01-30 00:00:00

COURT OF EXCHEQUER.-JAN 29.

Sitting in Banoo.—(Before tbi; Lord Chief Baron, and
Barons Martin, Bramwell, and ChannelL)
HARRISON V. JA ZS.—BOARD AND LODGER°.
_ . . .

Thin wee an action brought by the tatinitiff, a chemist, to
recover the amount of the board and • of the defend.
ant's son, who had been apprenticed to ca for a period of
three yams, the premium payable being 1001., 401. of which
was to he paid down and the reel is 2W. yearly lasi/aroma&
When the defeadest's eon bad been with the *Miff for
some menthe he wee removed, and hie father refund to pay
the 401., to recover which this action wee brought. At the
trial, whisk took before Mr. Justice Beating, at
Orford, the Pumas wee nonenited, on the ground that
there was so contract for hoard and lodging under these:w-
ant entered tato between the parties. A rule wee sub-
sequently obtained to eel amide the nonsult.
Mr. Bud/Gaston and Mr. Gray showed cause spinet the
rule, which was supported by Mr. Serjeant Pigott and Mr.
DoesdeswelL
The court were of opinion that the direction of the
learned judge was right, and discharged the rule.
Judgment accordingly.

COURT FOR DIVORCE AND MATRIMO-
NIAL 011711118.—Jae. 29.
(Before the Judge Ordiaary.)
POLL= V. ROLLO.
Thelleliseer al• wife of a veterinary
_surgeon, at Alton-
bruit Reatialowshint, sought • diasolntkm ol ber
marriage him on the ground of .dupery
and demoniac. She VIII married to him ia Fellow.
1154 end she lived with him for abut two =
MWs hand in his coat pocket some
#be led received from a yeas, lady. When she
ter biro on the subject he told her that le haled bm t
he loved the girl, and that he would dietedlille the
esbalitation. On the 2nd of March he left her, sad led
freer oboe contributed to her support. He had, however, paid
bra s vidtat her mother's house and asked barter some money-
Mb* had also been to him and salted kin to take her back,
bas .he bad refused. On the 2nd Rank, 1951. be wrote to
Ur, repostieg that be bated her, that he wee leaving Eng-
lead. and that he would sooner die then live with her again.
Essiee was oleo given to show that he had cohabited with
theyoling woman refined to, and that he hid gone through
a farm at manllp with bee.
Mr. Ser}sant P*lt, and Dr. Wambey appeared for the
petitioner.
The court nude 'decree nisi with code.
DAWDLE V. GANDA/
This was the pinkies of Anbella Gamble for • dissolution
of bee marriage with Joshua Guth* on the grounla of
mushy, bigamy, and adultery. The parties were married
on the 18th of March, 1842, end they obtained a situation as
master and mistress of a national school near Slough.
About three weeks after the marriage the respondent began
to treat his wife very ill, and be was guilty, it was alleged,
of the gravest Iniaooodlina to her. After • time he was dia.
tolled from his llmitsmoted he then married another
woman, by whom be had bad • family.
Mr. Powell appeared for the peeitioner.
The °out midis admits nisi, with costs.
LIPOID C. BAMFORD.
The petitioner in this ease sought a judicial separation, on
the ground of adultery. She wu the daughter of Admiral
Sir Edward Chatham' who bad since taken the additional
sense of Strode. She bad married the respondent is La-
vials Jane Andrews Chatham, but she mud sale as Lavinia
Bustled. The wedding took plus at Alventaite, on the
11th of Febru , 1843. The respondent, °apish& Robert
Pallas Bamford, had been in the 73rd, the 59th, and the
ave.Rogimerailg but be bed sold oat. He was charged with
wait mien mem bee the emu relied on was
Agues SIMI& 'Wleen be was served with the
dim ia February last, be obeseved that as his wife had
t fit to leave him for no reran, he hadohown to go
ell tb her musk. He also sent his comphmats to the
petitioner's attorney. with • meow to the aid that be was
"aa happy sea sestiboy," sad that he had never llown what
happiness was before.
Dr. Pbillimore, Q.C., and Dr. Wambey appeared for the
petitioner.
The court pronounced for the separation.
CHILWAS V. CHILNAN AND DOW.
Mr. Kerslake, Q.C., and Mr. Staveley Hill appeared far
the petitioner.
TheCitioner, • clerk in an asturance °floet married the
reap° ent in 1845, and cohabited with her in London till
Decent , 1867, haying bad in the interval as many as
sues children by her. At that time he separated from her
co amount of her drunken habits, and allowed her It. a
week. In September, 1880, she went to Dublin, where she
stated that she bad friends ; but it was soon discovered that
she was living with the co-respondeot an his wife.
The court made a deuce nisi with coats.