The Express.
London, England, 1855-08-14 00:00:00

Dr. Laebington directed further pee to be given.
COURT OF

T—AuousT 13.
00VIJSVEX.

avow ma. cm
_ IN as

This was a trader debtor

Chidley, for the debtor, submitted that the summons
had not been duly endorsed with the name and address of
the creditor's attorney. Mr. Chidley cited es parte Tin.
dill in re Tindall ;" also, the 80th rule for bankruptcy
practice, in support of this view. The omission was, he
oon,eoled, one of substance, which the court had no jusle-11
diction to amend.

Mr. Clark, for the creditor, sebraitted that the error we
immaterial, sad such as the court could correct.
lib Honour held otherwise, sad dismissed the petition.
IN RI COLCIIIIINN.
_

The bankrupt was a *shallot in Carltan-gardene.
Mr. Chidley appeared for Mr. Pashall, the trade
assignee, in rapport of a claim of 187 W. ; Mr. Begley ap-
peared for Mr. Pennell, the *Maud assignee, in opposition to
the claim.

HIS HOSOOT said the claire involved a role of law, upon
which t• a wort would take time for comtder►tion.
Judgmeot deterred aceordingly.
INSOLVENT DEBTORS Cl/MT.—AUGUST 13.

'mai T cm/

His Honour took bail wen sad motions to-day. There
were 11 'lndications to be discharged on sureties till the
hearing a the September sittings, nearly all of which were
granted. In one ease Mr. Dowse, the barrister, opposed,
and the application was refund.
IN NI MAIIIIICZ AAIONSON.-11LIOI0OS SCRUPLE/.
TM ease of this insolvent, s Jaw, was appointed to be
heard on the 13th September, and an application was now
made by Mr. Reed on his behalf to delay the hearing on
the ground that the 13th and 14th of that month were the
emanieaceenent cf the new year, and the season of prayers
would sot be concluded before the 22nd of the month, when
the White Fast would talus place. The notices ea the cre-
ditors had bees served, and therefore the application maid
be easily granted.
The Commiesioner said he had
application before.
The infamy mentioned a case in which a Jew had re-
fused to sign his name in the period.
Chief Commiesiveter—Ton do not recollect a cats where
es insolveut refuted to be discharged ?
Attorney—No.
Chief Commissioner—Nor do I. (A leugb.) His Roamer
made the hearing earlier than the one appointed, sad the
Insolent will appear on the 11th September.
IN TIN NATTER OP WILLIAM WNIOMT.—NOVIL APPLI-

CATION.
Mr. DAWN applied to the court on the pert of Mr.
Morley, a farmer, near Chester, to be appointed assignee.
and for en order on himself to bold and retain a sues of
2001. The insolvent was discharged under the act in 1845,
and at the last Chester Assizes received a verdict against
Mr. Merle• for 2001, which it was alleged he lent to his
wile is 1818, sod he called two witnesses to prove that in
Februsry bat she paid him 81. as interest. Mrs. Morley
was deee,sed her huibend denied that there was any money
doe to Wright. The debts under the insnlvence were only
SU, end Mr. Morley was n creditor for 251. The object of
the present appliemion wee to prevent the mosey being paid
to Wright, and to secure the mote for the creditors under
the losolvesey.
The Chief Commissioner remarked that it was the Bret
time be had t.satil of a man asking for en order on himself
to ►old and retain a aunt of mosey.
Mr. Dowse said it wee certainly a very novel case.
The court saw so necessity to appoint an aadgcee, but
made es order en Mr. Weis, to retain 1001., which would
be sufficient ter the debts and expense, and when he
showed Cause en order should be made to pay it into court.
Rele nisi granted.
The wart sat to a late hoar.