The Express.
London, England, 1864-06-22 00:00:00

WEDNESDAY EVENING, JUNE 22, 1864.

WHJJAH 1L1761113, Freed-street, Paddington, oilman—lat divi-
dend of la. 4fd , June tt, ami three aulannent Walasedays,
at Edward.... Bainnall.semet.
DIVIDENDS.
July 4. W. IL Frain, Bassugate, nocm.—July U. J. Tacked&
Great Batton-street, watch manaLcturee—Joly IS. J. Brandon
and It. P. Non, Abehurch lane and Inman Peasnarnace,
City, wine merduutte—July 4. F. Gray, Blentinglaan Ismp
I manufacturer—July 6. T. P. Waterhouse, Be. Lanca-
' shire, draper—July 6. J Hughes. Manyalleth. iloalgoneery-
shire, draper—July 14. C. IL B. Girdke, Eccles. LaDeath"
commisalon agent—July 6. J. Calvert, Harrogate, late innkeeper
—July 6. J. Scott, High Bamente. Yorkshire, grocer—July 0.
B. Watson, Sutton-cum. Land, Nottlaghsmahlre, greeer—Jaty 7.
G. Forth, Hilborough, Norfolk—July T. J. Needham, Swabia%
Norfolk—July 2. J. litrurell, lArerpool, eating-house keeper—
July 2. A. Blackwood, Leek Jewel cabiast maker—July 2.
J. Stubbs, Conaleton, Chhire painter—July 1. J. Fsase.
stone, Whitby, Yorkshire, late spirit merchant's clerk—July 12.
G. L Schembri, Leadenhallstreet, merchant.

PARTS ZEBU IPS DISSOLVED.
A. Thomson and J. Bryce, Birmingham ale merchants—T.
lickeneil and I. Yakima, llancheater, IllistErerb—L lea/
and L Tatum Wigton, Cumberinnd, ineretes— .P. Wilkinson
and I. Bamford, Halifax, wholesale grooere—F. b. Champion and
T. Gregory, Clement's-inn, Strand, ettorneys—A. Werner and K.
Tack, Bury.court, St. Mary-axe, merehanta—l. Newton and J. H.
Bramwell, Sheffield, stanufacturers—W. L Ruch and R.
Brldgwatar, ironlounders—J. Vensibles, Jun., and 8.
re-...a, Bioko-upon-Trent manufacturers of china—ti. Steven-
son and 8. Robinson, Norton, Yorkshire, eoachbolidera—W.
Cross, 0. Cordon W. Winn, and W. Gordon, Rood tans, City,
wboissale tea dealem—R. Davison, London-streetFenchurch-

;;;i7:11d5. 7Zine—l;el;eii;s:ii;d4;:"l7x7i;;-
prevenient. In holders for 11:091 or air, and other aerilorm
—W. Edwards and J. Page, Blilingagals. City, and Hastings,
Sums; nab yalesinen—W. Smith and L. J. Russell, Hestup.
Busses. sanded bread manufacturers—T. Jones and J. V. Jaw.
Birmingham, paper dealere—L licholleld and H. Prest-
wick, Lanceahire, Joinere—W. Ward, J. Maki, I. Mind J.
Mills, Nottingham, buildeni—lL B. Browne. P. Harwell, A. M.
Campbell, W. Young, and J. Campbell, Glasgow, Londsa, and
Liverpool, underwriter—A. W. Denham* and L Dewhunt, CM-
theroe and Manchester, oaten splinters—J. Thomason and G.
Thomson. Glimmer and Govan, engineers.
SCOTCH SEQUESTRATIONS.
Gnome KrugLawm, Bothwell, lAnarkshire, farmer, Inner', at
the Dangles and Clydesdale Hotel kArkle's). Hamilton.
Jams' herr, Goren, grocer, June 214 at the Faculty Hall,
Glasgow.
Osman CAKPIELL prawAl?, Edinburgh, Leith. and Kirkaldy,
boointaker, June V, at Dowell's Rooms, Edinburgh.
Huai Mosso, Fauldhoum, Linlititgowsblre, general merchant,
Jana ta at the Star sad Outer lintel, Linlithgow.
JAars Gams,
Hotel, HardekHayrick, hotel keeper, June If, at the Crown
Gavin HArutroM, Glasgow, writer, July I. at the Globe Hotel,
Paisley.

LAW INTELLIGENCE.
HOUSE OF LORDS.—.TErza 2L
.11,1E.t1.2.
TELVERTON V. TILVUTOW.

After oar report left yesterday,
The Attorney-Geosnd urged that a man might not be a
catholic and still not be • protestant. The appellant said that
" he was not much of anything," end he could not be Sikes
to be • protestant within the meaning of the act.
AA to his using the words, "lam • protestant catholic," it
weld not be presumed that they were used in a theological
sense. It was probable he meant that he was as much •
protestant as he was • catholic, that Is neither one nor the
other. He went no far am to say that as Irish marriage of
this kind between • Roman catholic and • presbyteries
would be legal under the act. In reference to ea
observation of the Lord Chancellor, the Attornsy.Ceneral
said that if their lordships thought • that the term
protestant applied to all protestant denominations, the
appellant would be bound to show that he was actually •
member of some one of those denominations. Raving

b•iefiy commented on the evi.ience given in Telethon to thi
religion of the appellant, and contended that it entirely
failed to show that he was a member of any protestant
church, or, indeed, professed any belief in peotarteetiam,
sod having resumed the arguments which he had used in
refenoce kl the Scotch manage, the learned counsel con-
eluded by pressing that there was ample evidence to show
a marriage according to Scotch law in either
of the ewes which he had put, and certainly it
was iooontestably shown that roarnage—hothet, hon.suable
marriage was contemplated and intended between theft
parties, sad if only the Irish =whip was is question, it
was not for the appellant eo utterly to &they lue• own aurae.
ter, while seeking to destroy that of the unfortunate and
much injured respondent, as he had don at the bar of the
hones, by imputing to her as well as to himself a scandalous,
wilful, and deliberate coarse of tionierality, which was con-
tradicted by every letter and by every adios which was
proved to have taken piths on the part of either of them.
The Lord Advocate followed on the same side, sod pro-
ceeded to argue that marriage, sad marriage alone, at first
publics and afterwards private, as alleged by the respondent,
was all along in the contereplaticie of both parties, and the
Irish mimeo was cot a sort of triumph on the part of the
respondent, but a sacrifice, to which she had othseeted, not
for her own sake, but for that of the appellant. He coo-
tended that the correspondence showed that the respondent
was not forcing herself on the appellant, as it was suggested
by the other side, and sentiment and tenderness was first
imported into it by the appellant. The learned counsel
travelled rapidly, but pointedly, over the ground on which
Wargument of the Attorney-General had been based, sod
was proceeding when the beers roes.

(Won
11013CICAULT V. DILATOILD.

Wood.)

Tbis case came as upon au application to amass the
mused by an nitertocutory application granted by
hisiegoooar last year to restrain the defeedast from per-
forming the Collets Bairn, which injunctive afterwards
failed, as already kilowo to tbs readers of this journal.
Mr. Maims, Mr. Dickinaoa, and Mr. Chitty appeared.
The Vioe-Chasomilor thought that the only real damage
agape from expense@ is posters, &c., sad awarded 51. bp.