The Express.
London, England, 1852-02-06 00:00:00

JUDICIAL COMMITTEE OF THE PRIVY

COUNCIL.—YsaTIMIDAT.
Pumas: Loin Uniswiessm eta Jot. Kronor Haves, Fla
anew, Immuswisst. sae ru Sawa.. Sus.
DOVOL&S W. tam Common or Bastaaa.—.lvoorame.
Ma woo a. appeal beet Bengal, ehkh arose out of a
thin pothered Ibp tie appe last, se the *Receipt of
lytabso
Do. is b erekile nom, priott_pel and =6.llhe poem& of die obi the trWages of
sod a lbw* show of Menem eitoete is the
=itNiof Bed, The sake of thee estates wore ef-
t,7 tbe edloster of Dieeseee lbw they had been
dmothinfed to I/it Da It Woe astmewiel ea behalf of
Ile wiliest the orsteseeet. that the milbeee trite
Ste wpm et lbeekreolloh at the flan when it
!hoa rby him to the firm of which Jykishen Das
Wehi before any claim ezisted on the part of
.of nortareo. The mortgage to Jykishen
im we
vimmi in the came, and the only beneficial
rimerghsikh Gholam Ahniud had in the property
awl by his father was merely a right tom murk
onto gaaaeia it the sale of the property as might remain
NW debt due under the mortgage to
gblehettle.l
It on Um other hand submitted, on
behalf of the roopondnit, that the villages in question in
the wit wore the peoperty of Sheikh Oholarn Ahmud, and
Wen • the property of Sheikh Shookroollah, and no
interest in the east could have reseed from Sheikh
lbookroollah to Baboo Jykishea Des. If the ap-
pellant had any claim as mortgagee, such claim would he
figairrit the propene itself, or season the present owners of
The property, and tile sale of the property having taken
place without any attachment having been issued in the
gait in which Cie decree of June 15, 1835, was obtained, no
claim could be .uAtamed against the government in rispect
Of the purchaw money. Ibe claim in quintion woo bared
hi the Denial Regulations of Limitations, see. 14, regula-
tion 3, of 1/93, and menu.' 8, regulation 7, of 1790.
Thu council &livered judgment, and reversed the de-
gree of the court below, but remitted the cue to Indus with
Certain direct-arm _

Judgment ad. ordingly.
Loris EXTBN*IOIII or LETTERS PAth•tr.
The evidence in this cue occupied the attention of the
seemed the whole of the day. The further heAring of the
ewe will be resumed ea the 19th inst.

COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH.—YzaTERDAT.
linTima AT Ni.l l'Aita AT TrownsugAT A.—Barusa L AL. CAursau.
/11.11 °MOWN Jratu.
SMITS. AIM (THIS/ r. WILD (M.P.).—Tut

0 Loaa:

Was so aetion to recover the even of 671. 2.. 61., for
advertising the Jet-indent'. globe in Li ieeeter-aquarst in
rodeo) caiitaites. The deb:admit had pleaded never in-
debted.

1 he plaintiffs constituted the Railway Advertising Com-
pusy. A peraim ealliAl Crossley, an agent of the pleintiffs,
tolled mi the defendant in the spring of last year to ask
Rim lo give the autopsy as order to adverting ►is globe,
sad au age cogent was entered into that the company wet*
to post :40W Omar& in railway carriages re venous lines
throughout the country, for which the drfen•lent wry to
pay the sum of nut by monthly paymenu. The first two
swaths were duly pod, and the present ernes was to re-
(Over t►e einouot due for the third and fourth months.
Th: defense set up •an that the contract was from month
to month, and not for us mouths; that the plac.irds were
mot posted veconling to the contract ; that the defend .at
had paid • colonise In full satisfaction of the plaintiff.' claim,
and gave thins notice that he should not continue to ad-
vertise.

Ihr jury returned u verdict fur the plaintiffs for the
eavuot claimed.

COURT OF EXCHEQUER.—Y►aremDAT.

Burns.. at )141 Past, • r .111111MTIOn —1,101.111 A Tea 1.041
ti.sov aro. IVICIAL hall.
Tat ATTOUNZII•OCNERAL O. KIREIN.-81141740L1110

wirers! pleas, of which the third war the mot impeetsat,
namely, that he had delivered Imelda dale deeds se pro-
perty of his at Tideswell to dm dellembed elver, Wil•
had received them in full taditibilaim of WM peeshee is
the declaration mentioned. After the Wise wet at Mee,
it WA. referred to a gentleman at the bar by the order of
Mr. Justice Coleridge. The arbitrator nada his award.
which was as all the issues in &veer et the piled, is the
satins, sad whit* Amid the domes. MIAMI& Mb. The
arbitrator dm &Misdeed that the title dude leheted to
should be bold es • security for 2.70111. end latmeit, ea pay-
ment of which they should he delivered up le the /!dung
in error; sad, lastly, that tho basking empeey shield
give him a release of all matters and eleime es did=
up to the date of his submission; bet se Mew eves
to be gives to the other side, so that the plaietif is error
was left at liberty to bring any Udell be night think fit.
The present action was brought epos the award, to recover
the sum awarded to the defendant in error ; and the de-
fendant in the action plesileil,brst, never indebted ; secondly,
that the arbitrator did not make an award in the
in and form stated ; and thirdly, a set of. On the
trial it was contended that the award was silent upon
various matters referred relative to the title deeds, that it
did not thus dispose of all the matters in difference, and
that therefore it was invalid and bad in law. The learned
judge, however, ruled to the contrary, and such ruling was
excepted against.
Mr. Serjeunt Miller now appeared in support of the ease
of the plaintiff in error, and Mr. Cowling for the defendant.
The Court decided that the judgment of the court below
should be affirmed.

SHERIFFS' COUItT.—YUBT►atwT.
Evora Mn W. BM-11W. Demi'. V.v.. Sauer.
BELL V. ROLT.—ASSAULT. _ .