The Express.
London, England, 1863-01-20 00:00:00

TNN HUMERUS OF THE COUNT.

Se►ral other motions were made in the coarse of t►e day,
and in reformism to one merle by Mr. Thomism, which was to
the venue from the errantry to London, the Lord
Cchirer Justice said it was a perpetual eomplaint, trying
country canoes in Lmdon. Unless that. were some apeml
cirournotanoes, a our ought not to be removed from the
country to London.
The application was retied.

Pettis. st Nisi Prior.--(Blare Mr. Justice Mellor and •
Oarsmen Jury.)
151:1111211all OF WA 001717.

The lid contains 46 ammo, MI of which are !manias sad
14 Dew awe.

irzwrox v. GLILDPIO.

This was so action for &oder botwosai two shop.lwapeis
is Visigar-Terd. The Lamps was of the °cons* sod
lowest dosoraptios, sad totaDy wait to be reported.

COURT OF EXCHEQUER.-JAK. 19.

(NOM. M Nisi Prior—Balare Kr. Bares Bramwell and •
Common Jury.)

DAVIS O. lIITCHILL.

This w an action brought by tbe plaintiff to moovor the
valued •boat all to been bass destro ed by the de-
famelant's servant running it dims apes the
Mr. Strom Bramwell sommeated way severely spas 'wi-
llow et this kind (the whole deka not mooed* 101. or
111.) being brought into the imporisr courts, and
The jury rstorssd a mrdiet for the defendant.
TAILOR O. WOODEIZAD.-121.ACN OP rim= or IIIIMAOS.

This was aa 'Mimic' breach of promise of marriage. The
Mordant plaided that h• serer promised.
Mr. Ms, Q.C., sod Mr. Clole, were mensal for the plain-
tiff • Mr. Hawkins, Q. 0., sad Mr. Lnitoo, for the de-
feorisat.

- It ap-Psared from the evidence that both parties lived war
Huddersfield, and their. parasite were insaufacturei 4. About
sorsa years ap the plant." sus espied to la young moo,
who seesoed hw. dedesdrat knew of that =com-
ets:sae, and subesques* he merle des of marriage to her,
which she aceepteci. nay were winged for about two
yews, is the mule of which time be seduced her, and the
resift was the birth of is child is limb lost. He oonti-
sued to court her until about July last, when he left her,
sever sawurewsmain, sod married memo of property
shortly al
The as was devoid of the incidents one* found in an
action for breach of promise of marriage no love token
bad boss FITe by either party, and pot a letter had weed
between them on either side.

The defendant called Do witamees.
Mr. Hawkins, in addressing the jury co the part of the
defendant commented upon the plaintiff'■ case. Be de-
nied that the defendant ever promised to marry the plain-
tiff. He had " chaffed" her on some occariona when they
were going to market upon the omnibus, bet he never pro-
mised her marriage. He never gave her a token, nee ever
wrote her a letter during the whole of the time that the
plaintiff alleged he was courting her.
The learned Judge commented upon the frail evidence
whined before the jury of a contract to marry. He thought
the jury ought Dot to give the plaintiff a verdlot out of
compasoun for her, ace out of reprobatioeof the defendant's
eoadact. in eoesequence of hie having seduced her.
The jury returned a verdict for the defendant.

COURT OF BANKRUPTCY.—JAN. 19.
(Before Mr. Czamiarioner Goa'barn.)

of RZ LAWS.

The bankrupt was a trine me ;nit nt, of Miocing.lane, and
of Clapham. This was the sittin for examinatioa and dis-
charge. The account‘. prepared by Marrs. Hart Brothers
and Bayles, show li .bilitire of =AMU. ; wets is good debt.
sod pro 3,3001. • property bold es attearity, 21.4111.
Mr. appeared for **assigner • Mr. E. Reed
and Hr. for creditors ; and Mr. Ur:Eater for the
bankrupt.

t appearing that the bankrupt had not fully answered
the requisitions which had bees {iodated to him, an ad.
journment was ordered.

(Before Mr. Commissions? Hotreyd4
IN NI gaargoorg.
The bankrupt, a cornet I. tha llth Human, owing about
3,000 f., recently applisrl for his order of discharge. Helms
"ficrby Mr. E. Road and Mr. Lucas fur creditors.
iHonour gam judgment. He said that the bankrupt
had been guilty of reckless and extravagant conduct, but it
was only fair to say that Dope of his debts had been coo.
treated by fraudulent rapeseetattoos. He had expectatiooa
from various sources The oomplsiats of the opposing cre-
ditors bad not been established, bat the bankrupt had bees
guilty of enju•Sifablo extravagance in living. Lookiog at
the extreme youth of the bankrupt, and considering that
many of his &Ma bad been contracted in his minority, the
court thought that Ms justice of the can would be ant by
suspending the order of discharge for sight mouths, with
proWstio.

It is now conclusively established that no other
oil can possibly produce the none beneficial effects as Dr. de
Jongba oil on the eoesumptive invalid. A. Chattaway, Sat,
surgeon. of Loomtoster, writes :—" Having for some years os-
tensively used Dr. de lough*, light Brown Cod Liver Oil, both
in public and private practice, In the treatment of consumpti.
I have uo hesitation In stating Its effects are very far superior
to those deny other cod liver oil.'—Bold °Wile imputed bottles,
A, ed., es. Pd., and a., by the sole meats, Auer, Hayford, end
C.. 77, Strand, London. and thesaista—Advertlisiment.