The Press.
London, England, 1853-06-11 00:00:00

iSB

provided against Popish encroachment. But
it is strange how rarely have even the most
violent opponents of " Popery " set forth the
true relation in which the Roman .Cathohe
Church of necessity stands to the rival power,
and, till this relation is fully and generally
understood. no advance van be made towards
establishing harmony lietween it Himont
Catholic population and a Protestant Govern-
ment.
The advocates of " Emancipation " were wont
to argue that if what they considered reason-
able terms, that is to say. the equality of civil
rights for which they pleaded, were granted,
the Romish Church might lie believed in her
protestations Of eternal gratitude and content-
ment for the future. To this their opponents
variously replied that she never would be con-
tent, some said till she shared, others till
she engrossed, the endowments and ileges
of the Established Church; but all assumed
that there is some point, which if attained,
her ambition would be gorged, and priestly
agitation would cease.
Now here lies the fundamental error which
vitiates all our reasonings on the subjeet.
for the sake of argument, we can bring our•
selves to suppose that in this country the
Church of Route were dominant—sole—armed
with the sword of perseention, and basking in
the favour of a Popish dynasty, there would
then commence the struggle between the civil
and the eeelesiastical power which the preten-
sions of Rome make inevitable. The relation of
the Romish Church to the State is one of
antagonism ; her ladles is ceaseless aggression
and encroachment. I t was only by a es impnimise,
the result of a struggle enduring for
eenturies, that in each European state the in-
dependent action of the civil power was at
last secured. Even in Spain, where the alli
ance between despotism and bigotry was so
rinse. and their mutual intelligence seemed so
perfeet, there were constant biekerings and
quarrels—Papal nunciiis withdrawn from
Madrid, grandee ambassadors pouting at
Rome ; and in the last century these moae-
tinet went so far as to cause the
expulsion of the Jesuits. • But it in the most
bigoted state of Europe, where the Crown mid
the Tiara found their interest in a eommon
league for the oppression of the people, it was
neeessary to set up barriers against priestly
domination, how is it possible that in a Protes-
tant state the Romish Church can lie allowed
to exercise an unlimited power of aggression
which it now alums as a social right, under
the name of expansion and development ?
It is •nootiftstia isspossibie. The safeguards
against Papal and priestly encroachment
which are needed ill it Ituuuul Ciltholle Coun-
try c,uulut, ri fiirtiori, be dispensed with in it
Protestant one. These may be established either
by coercive laws, or by the terms of a mutual
compact ; but, by the consent or without the
consent of the Roman Catholic body, the Pro-
testant government and constitution must be
protected in the exercise of its sovereignty
against the pretensions and interference of
Rome.
It is obvious how this principle applies to
the present attitude of the Runtish Church in
these countries ; but to follow it to its conse-
quences would curry us too far at present ;
amid indeed the present moment is lint favour.
able for the discussion. The Protestant pub-
lic is not yet prepared to adopt either of the
alternatives, one of which we consider ulti-
mittelv inevitable. The Romish priesthood
tind the present state of unopposed hostility—
the warfare of Juvenal. " rnissis egf•
rofrulu"—too pleasant and profitable to desire
its speedy termination.
And vet, says the Seidel► proverb. when the
night is darkest, dawn is the nearest. An
overdose of poison sometimes nets its its owu
antidote. The vast inerease of power which
Rome has reeently obtained. and the lofty
tone which she has assumed throughout Chris-
tendom, must shortly produee a reaction. In
Ireland, our author tells us,—and in this he
opneurs with many other witnesses,--that the
arrogance and ingratitude of the priesthood
have disgusted t heir most influential sup-
porters. Till the Relief Act was passed the
interests of both elerg,y and laity seemed
identical, and for some years after O'Connell's

THE PRESS.

triumph their alliance promoted the ambitious
views of each. But the moment of victory is
often fatal to the union of the victors. The
priests began to feel that in many particulars
which are ably explained by our author their
interests were at variance with those of the
landlords. The toil was all theirs—they would
not share the prize. They could now command,
11114 WOlll4l no longer obey; they dismissed
with contumely their old, unmanageable
patrol's, to make way for their new,
subservient clients. We sympathise with
the indignation which our author expresses
at the outrages and insults with which the
priests and their mobs at the lute elee•
Lions in Ireland drove from the hustings the
most respectable of the old advocates for
Catholic claims—men who imagined that they
had earned immortal gratitude front their
('hureh—and that in building up her greatness
they were raising a pedestal to their own am.
bition. But we cannot regret that they have
received this lesson, and we hope it will not
be lost on their coreligionists in this country.
If the Roman Catholic layman will not be
taught by history, he must leant by his own
experience that to toil for the exaltation of the
priesthood is to forge his own fetters; that he
needs the protection of the state and of its law
—be the state Romeo) Catholic or Protestant—
to save him front the encroachments of his own
clergy ; and that if he takes their part against
the state and the law he will be rewarded by
the seduction of his relations into convents twat
the spoliation of his inheritance.
But, besides this general diversity of
interest, other causes there are which bring
the Irish proptietor into immediate collision
with his priest. Our author explains this
(p.. 18) :
The chief source of income of the Litwin Catholic
priests in 'rebind is derived front what may lie ealled
capitation or poll tax. The more usual name for it is
house-money. At Christians and at Easter certain dues
are payable, in proport. to the number of each family.
To these dues we must add the larger and more easily en-
forced fees on marriages, christenings, chineltings, masses
at funerals, and prayers tnr the dead. It cousetinently
fllows, that the priests' income vauies directly as the
ttttt ober of his thwk. Nor lit it he supposed that only
the •lt wealthy putt of the flock is tueaut—no Otte is too
11001* to pay the priest. Of my own knowledge I may
assert, the priest finds out the alms that paupers have
reeeiVed, aunt MOO from them enforces payment of his
tines. His direct interest then is, that the population
should be inereastsl ; and his natural bias is to encourage
every part of the reckless system by which population has
been multiplitsl and Ireland has lwen 'initialised. To
this the true interests of the landlotsl have always been
opposild. All true friends of Ireland have raised their
vlowes, but hitherto in vain, against the wasteful sub-
letting of land, and other abuses which encourage early
maniages, so prolific of income to the priest, but of beggary
to the nation.
lint now, since the recent introduetion of the poor law
into Ireland, what was befOre n oath r of window has be-
emote a matter of necessity. The landowner must resist
the present systent, or else be swept away with it. The
hostility which the priest professes to him is not the mere
expression of intolerance (grossly intolerant as is the
limgolige now so ovovrally employed), it is Hot. St tpleStio/1
Of lease " to breathe the fresh breezes of the Atlantic," as
Father Cahill puts it ; the trite question is, who shall
tually possess tlw broad acres of Ireland; it has now
lwetane between the priest and the landlord a question of
existence.
The RuHilish clergy are increased since 1831
front 1,711 U to 3,000, including monastic estah-
lishments (p. 51), while the population which
is to support them is greatly diminished.
Truly the violence which our author describes
is quite intelligible, if it, be not excusable.
The subject of Maynooth he treats inci-
dentally and slightly ; but the hint which he
throws out for the solution of the difficulty in
which our future legislation with respect to it
is involved deserves consideration (p. 71). and
we are desirous not to lose an opportunity of
giving it circulation. The recent vote of the
House of Commons refusing a trifling sum for
repahing the buildings of an institution to
which it had already voted so large an annual
grant argues at degree of ill-humour in the
public mind which makes some change, and
at no distant period, inevitable. And admit-
ting as we must the difficulty of withdrawing the
grant. and the inconvenience of continuing it
on the present terms. we gladly encourage the
dismission of any middle course that seems to
lead to a solution of the problem.

Most of our readers :ire fainiliar with the
general outline Ilf the circumstaanc•es attend-
ing the foundation of Mayuouth College.

SATURtAY,

In the year 1794, when the French revolu-
tion had closed the colleges where the greater
part of the Irish priesthood received their
education, and had confiscated their endow-
ments, a wish was loudly expressed for the
establishment of an Irish national college.
The Irish Liberals of the day were the chief
promoters of this scheme, by which they
doubtless intended to advance their own poli-
tiesl objects, and in the management of the
proposed foundation they desired only partially
to include the clera. The hierarchs of the day
took the alarm. They at once deserted their
lay allies, by whom they were loudly accused
of treachery, and they represented to Govern
ment the meonveuience of bringing up the
clergy by French republicans on the one hand,
or by Irish republicans and repealers on the
other. In their formal memorial to the Lord
Ileutenamt they promised, us usual, eternal
gratitude and loyalty, and proposed regulations
by which the control of the Sovereign over the
future place of education seemed satisfactorily
secured. Mr. Pitt and his Cabinet, "good easy
souls," imagined that they were a match for
the priests ; they fell into the trap. The over-
tures were atecepted—Maynooth was founded ;
and, moreover, what had not even been asked
was endowed. Whether 1)r. Hussey, the first
president, and the other leaders of the clergy,
distinctly foresaw and intended what has since
occurred is immaterial. It is clear that
throughout the whole transaction reciprocal
advantages were promised ; on the one hand,
the Crown gave protection and support ; on the
other it was to exercise control and to receive
obedience ; and it is equally clear that the
present working of the system at Maynooth is
entirely at valiance with its original intention.
The exclusive right of the bishops to nominate
students ; the care with which they confine
their selection to the poorest and the humblest,
who have no ties or connections but those
which bind them to the Church ; their su
preme control over the discipline and mode of
education, have effectually counterbalanced the
appointment of laymen and even Protestants
(among whom is the Irish Chancellor, ex qfieio)
as co-trustees. The method by which our
author proposes to restore Maynooth to the
uses which were contemplated by its founders
is to open it to the Roman Catholic body at
large. He does not give us even the outline of-
his scheme, which he admits is " more easily
enunciated than executed" (p. 72) ; but we pre-
sume that to open some of the studentships to
competition—to bestow some us endowments of
schools, or to share them with Roman Catholic
benefactors—to admit the laity to a certain
effective participation in the management of
the college, or at least the appointment of its
officers—to admit, exclusively of the founds
limn, students who arc able to maintain them
selves and pay for their education—would form
parts of his phut.
We look forward to the time when the Roman
Catholic body, disgusted with the selfish
violence of the priests, and the tyranny which
already has been exercised upon themselves,
will be willing to co-operate with a Protestant
Government in fixing those barriers which
under no circumstances the Romish priesthood
eau be allowed to pass. And in the meantime
we think that a Royal commission might be
able to suggest such reforms in this place of
education as might be acceptable to the rea-
sonable and well-disposed of the Catholic
body, and might reconcile good Protestants to
the support of a Romanist college.
All our projects of improvement, however,
must be kept subordinate and dependent on the
mighty change which is going on within Ireland
herself. Already the numerical majority of the
Romanists diminished to a mere equality,
while the laud in possession of the Protestant
proprietors exceeds nineteen-twentieths of the
whole acreage of the country. Our author
bears testimony to the sincerity and extent of
those conversions the first reports of which
the public so wisely received with sceptical
caution. The most unimpeachable witnesses
attest that at this time, for the most part, the
priest's empire in Ireland is one of fear. His
selfish conduct during the famine, his tyranny
and his violence, have alienated the affections
of the peasantry ; and when their minds are
relieved from the superstitious dread of his
preternatural powers, or the number of the

JUNE 11, 1853.

converts seems great enough to guarantee them
from the dread of the persecution he eau stir
u]► against them, they gladly throw off the yoke
which the prospect of relict makes them feel
to be intolerable.
Our limits do not permit us to enter further
into this interesting subject at ►resent. We
will only add that the reasons which in former
days induced us to treat with resel ye all pro
posals tin• proselytising in Ireland are now
swept away, and that it seems the duty of all
good Protestants to co-operate in the great
work which Providence has so suddenly and
so unexpectedly laud before them.

The, Birth If the lrar-tiod. A Poem by Kidi-
disa. Translated front the Sanskrit into
English Verse by Ralph T. H. Griffith, M.A.
London : W. H. Allen and Co.
WHEN Colonel Baden founded the chair of
Sanskrit in the University of Oxford, with the
praiseworthy object of promoting Christianity
in India, he conferred, perhaps unwittingly. au
immense benefit on the world of literature.
His munificent bequest not only afforded en-
couragement for the study of one of the most
ancient and polished of languages, but was the
tneans of securing to the University the ser-
vices, as a teacher, of Horace Hayman Wilson,
the most aeemnplished Sanskrit scholar that
this or any other country has produced. Al-
ready are the fruits of' Professor Wilson's
instructions becoming manifest, and Monier
Williams and Ralph tiriffith, by contributing
to the knowledge and diffusion of the lite-
rature of India. have shown themselves not
unworthy of their learned master.
Sanskrit poetry will, perhaps, never become
generally popular in this country; for, although
it admits of being more closely rendered into
English than that of Arabia, Persia, or Turkey,
there are so many mythological and historical
allusions, so many metaphors and comparisons
seemingly strained and extritvagant—in fact. so
much for the English reader to Porn and un-
learn before be can be in a position to appre-
ciate mid admire the poetry of the Hindus—
that, except for the few, we fear it will long
remain a sealed book. There are, however, as
we hope. if not a large number, at least a few,
of the reading public who will not be deterred
by these difficulties, and who may be willing
to devote some little time, and make some
allowances for their own ignorance, so that
after a short space they may be enabled to
understand and appreciate a poetry of which
they cannot fail soon to discover the beauties.
To such we heartily recommend the present
volume.
The intrinsic value of the poetry of India
may not be disputed ; several of the greatest
European poets, critics, and scholars have
pronounced judgment in its favour ; and the
admiration of such men as Sir W. Jones,
Goethe, Schlegel, Humboldt, Wilson, and Mil-
man, must be considered decisive as to its
merits. We have in Sanskrit epics and dramas
which are entitled to be placed side by side
with the noblest efforts of the classical writers,
and which must be as imperishable. As yet
few Sanskrit poems have been translated, but
the " Specimens of the Hindu Theatre" by
Wilson, Milman's version of the beautiful epi-
sode " Nala and Damayanti," and Griffith's
" Specimens of Old Indian Poetry," will be
sufficient to vindicate the opinion we have
expressed.
The present volume is the latest transla-
tion of Sanskrit poetry. The " Birth of the
War-God" is the work of Kididitsa," the author
"of the beautiful dramas of Sakontalit, and
" the ' Hero and the Nymph,' the former of
" which has long enjoyed an European cele-
brity in the translation of Sir W. Jones, and
" the latter being one of the most charming
' of Professor Wilson's specimens of the Hindu

•• theatre."
Scarcely anything is known of the life of
Kididisa; the time when he flourished is even
uncertain. Mr. thiffith says
Of the history of Kididissa, to w•t►om by genenil assent
the " Kumara Sanibhaysi," or'• Birth of the War-( iod," is at-
tributed, we know but little with any certainty; we can only
gather from a memorial-verse which enumerates their
names, that he was one of the " Nine Precious Stones"
that shone at the Court of Vikraraialitya, King of Oujein

THE PRESS.

in the half century immediately precetling the Christian
era. As the examination of ark .sits for and agsinst the
correctness of this date is not likely to interest general
readers, I ntu.t request them to rest sinistlea with the be•
lief that. about the time when Virgil told Hornet• were
shedding :111 Inlaying Issue; upon the reign of Augustus.
our poet Kislitlass lived, loved, and sang. giving and taking
honour. at the polished court of the Ho less twanitieent
patron of Sanskrit literature, at the period of its highest
perfection.
Sir W. Jones calls Kilidisa the Shakspeare
Of the East and Schlegel, in his criticism on
the translation of the " Sakontali," repeats the
comparison :—" The drama of ' Sakontala:
says the greatest of dramatic, critics, "presents.
" through its Oriental brilliancy of colouring,
" striking at resemblance, upon the whole.
" to our romantic drama. that it might be sus-
.' 'wiled the love of Shakspeare had influenced
" the translator, if other Orientalists had not
"borne testimony to the fidelity of his trans-
" lation." Professor Wilson mentions Kill-
olisa in terms of the highest poloist.. In his
remarks on the " Hero and the Nymph'. he
rya :—" The chief charm of this payee, how-
" ever, is its poetry. The story, the situations.
"and the characters are all highly imaginative.
" and nothing, if partiality does not mislead
" the translator, can surpass the beauty and
" justice of nanny of the thoughts." Although
we scarcely dare place Kilidasat on an equality
with the prince of poets, who must ever stand
alone, yet all who have perused the works we
have mentioned will agree with Mr. Oriffith
in setting him "very high among the glorious
" company of the sons of song."
The most striking beauty in the poetry of
the Hindus is the extreme richness of imagery
and the marvellous Immer of description. In
these respects Milldam is unrivalled. It is
almost unfitly to select one passage to the
disparagement of others, and we art' inclined
to refer our readers to the volume itself. which
must be read in its entirety in order to form
an aecurate idea of the beauty of the poem.
We, however, extract at hazard an °Mold tale
on an inexhaustible subject :
Her hidden beauties though no tongue nosy tell,
Yet Siva's hove will aid the fancy well ;
No other 'sushi could deem her boasted charms
Worthy the clasp of such a husband's arms.
Between the partings of fair Ullln'S vest
/'time hasty glimpses of a lovely breast :
So closely then! the kissing hillocks rose,
tearer could the Lotus in the vale repose ;
And if her loosened zone e'er slipped below,
All was so bright beneath the mantle's flow.
So dazzling WOO, as if the maid haul braced
A band of gems to sparkle Tomalley waist ;
While the dear dimples of her downy skin
Seemed fitting conch for Love to revel its.
Her anus were softer than tlw flowery dart,
Young Kinlatia arrow, that subdues the heart ;
For vain his strife with Sivas, till at last
lie chose those chains to bind his conqueror fast.
E'en the new moon poured &Nil a paler' 'Winn
When hot' long lingt•lN 11i0411191 their rosy gIYIIIII,
And brighter dam Asolois rich leaves+ threw
A glory round, like • .r's evening hue.
The strings Or 114%11: 04TOSS her LOSOIII thrown
Increased its beauty, and enhanced their own,—
I her 'avast, her jewels, seeming to agree,
The saunter now, and now the adorned to he.
When Beauty gazes on the fait. full Moon,
No Lotus chasms her, for it 1110011114 at 11.5111 :
If on that Hower she tied her Named eye,
No Moon is al g from the • tatty sky :
She to on lima's face, lanore heavenly fair.
And foffilld their Oasis% is Itil Milted there.
The loveliest dower that ever opened yet
lurid in the fairest branch—al twarl that's set
In richest coral—with her smile might vie
Dashing through lips bright with their rosy dye.
And when she spoke—upon the maiden's toll gut.,
Distilling nectar, such rimd secants hung,
The sweetest note that V. 41. the Koil poured
Seemed harsh and tuneless us a jamng

* }-,stag Kringah•:4 firrooor. I Kansa. the Unpin 00.1, i.; armed
With it biiN, the arrsiws ill Wldill sire made of timers.
And brighter than Asoka's rich genres.) Nothing, we sire
told, can excesshe beauty sof this NIII.II fl idilolll.
It IS, of course,' at general favoutite tilt (lie poets sit Indl
dia.
2 The strings if pen el.]
"'flea, no, the pearl from out its shell
1.11140111 y, ilk the 14111111.4 K sea.
(As 'twere a spirit, titreell to dwell
In form unlovely) tens sclfree,
And 'sound the sleek sof alumni tlirew
.1 light it lent mist burriared
Moony—hires tf the Angels.
Moore is frequently the hest interpreter, iniconseiously, of tut
Indian port's tl ••••• ght. It is worth rclurrrkiut, that the Sanskrit
word welkin, pearl (literally .treed), sitmities ttlso the spirU re-
leased from ititiltilutte existence, and rssintegritted with its divine
original.
# sweetest node the Noil erer rotored.] The Kukibt or Koil
the Marl. or Italian Cuekoo, its the Bulbul sir Nightingale uf Him
dila an. It is itbko the herald of Spring. e its Ellnop
nem .sake, and the fetmde bird is the especial messengerk•a of
Love.

139

The melting glance of that soft liquid eye,
Tremulous like lilies when the breezes sigh,
Which learnt it first—so winning and so mild—
The gentle fawn, or Mena's gentler child?
Anti oh, the arching of her brow ! so tine
Was the rare beauty of its pencilled line—
Lave gazed upon her fitreheutt in &spiv.
And spurned the Iltiw he once esteemed so fitir :
Her long bright tresses too might sham. the pride
Of envious atitelors uu Ilia uouunlin
Surely the Maker's van. hail lawn to cull
From all that's lovely the most beautiful.
As it' till' world's I'mantr would behold
All beauty centred in a single m l old.
tillCAtioll Mlle whether any deseriptiou
of female loveliness in the European languageh
would appear to greater advantage in Iron

lotion.
The notes are 101111 the pen of Mr. Griffith.
The translator's versification is smooth and
even, is always above mediocrity, and fre-
quently rises into poetry of expression. The
elision of the short vowels required by the
metre (the vowels being written but nut
sounded) is objectionable : in the very first
line we find " Himalaya'," and in the above ev
thug the womb; "tremulous" and "antelopes,"
which must be Ill'olltallleell 1 lima? ga, two-
hum, and Iliit/111/01. lint this is perhaps hyper
criticism. Our readers may place the most
wrfect reliance on Mr. Griffith :4 accuracy, for
we halve 'ourselves heard Professor Wilson
testify to his scholarship. 'rranslatiton, how-
ever, at the best. and especially into verse, is
a severe test ot' the merits of an original. Mr.
Griffith modestly remarks :
Flllly OW I 1.111151.11111 S 11111 V CIE I 11111 1.111111 111411 g Alt' ado.•
gamely to reproilito. the bowlful creation of the sweet
siagur of iinjoiii; that mitino.rious lovatitiessi of thought and
exiors.sissiiiii I may haw pivoted by, mistaken, nuirreol ; Clad in
tunny of Ills. mode elalosorat I' 411•Seliptilins ray own ‘1.11.311-
11.1111 tttt iS •• IlarSll AS 111 e jAlTillg of a taarksa chord,- i•ota.
isitivil with the ntuisitly of lialiolasn'A rhythm no tiy id whosd•
myeetaesse• and parity of laits.tina.ti., rdo 111111111111 k 11111111114111
1111' SIM 111111 he RIO 14.11.5111111, rosssy lins• of lik padm.s.,,
would lime tried all the fertility of 11.'5111E1W, the ItettSitt.
Skill, and the sAlltitSite ell' a the author of •• Lind llookli"
1 • welt'. I do lad think this. 'nada ils•sd•rvi.., ansl lum
save it will not obtain. dud admiration whiell the authoweps
um•sstertoiccus airs.asly made kitsiwn at made commanded; ut
all 'Arid..., if the wsoll, 11,44 I. not intidior, it has 1101 1.11•
joyesl the gISSI ftsettille of 1111%111g A 311111“, or Waistos for
iriiiitslatior.
The title of the 11111.111 is 11.11 apparent mis-
nomer. Since, as it hits come down to us, it
only extends to the nuptials of the War-Ood's
mother. It is uncertain whether Kiditlasa left
his work unfinished, or whether the eon-
eluding portion has been lost; it is, however,
traditionally reported that, the poem origindly
consisted of twenty-twit cantos, of which only
seven are now extant.
We have one fault to find with Mr. Griffith :
in mentioning his difh•rent obligations to pre-
vious writers, he speaks of Professor Stew.-
ler's edition of the poem as follows :—" Valu-
able as this work is laud I will not disown my
great obligations to it), it is much to be regretted
that the extracts 'l'olll the native etalllllelltalla's
are so scanty, and the annotations so few and
brier From this at, fine would illlagine
that Dr. Stenzler actually published, along
with his excellent text, is Latin trandatiota.
The omitting to notice so important all item
in the labours of the learned Wyman may
have, and we hope has, arisen from careless
'Less ; but we cannot help remembering that
Mr. Oritlith in the preface to his " Speehnens
of Ohl indium Poetry: whilst recapitulating the
various translations of Sanskrit poems, scarcely
mentions Wilson's " Hindi' Theatre," the most
remarkable of all.
Mr. el riffith is entitled to the thanks of every
lover of Oriental literature for the efforts he
huts Millie in behalf of Sanskrit laletly, and we
trust soon to see him again in the field. Why
does he not try his hand on the Rionityama
and the Nlaleiblthratit, two of the noblest epics
in the world ° Wl. Want something more than
mere extracts from these immortal works.
Homer, Virgil. and Milton may be beyond all
praise, but Vihniki and Vyitsa are not there-
fore to be neglected or despised.
The present volume is published under the
patronage of the Oriental Translation Fund.
an institution which ham done much for Eastern
literature, but, as we regret to learn, is now
----------.

• Kumar% Saadilawn Ki Cannel+, Sankrite et Lath r
eilidit A. F. Stetizier, 4iii. Herb++ and la.daltdi, la:ta. (Printed
rid the Orietitul Trate-beam Fund.) The elaanient meliolar
will
derive +math pleasure frail a couirifrifiiat of sten7lei tren.4.
'alio' with the vor4iolt b;* )Ir. tirllllll4.