The Express.
London, England, 1863-04-29 00:00:00

lab Inuntout.

EQUITY COURTS.—Arim. 28.
Wore Vier•Chaeosilor Sir W. P. Wood.)
GIIIIIIR V. 0131111T.—THI 00111111 T DIVOICA.
We wee a mit iastituted by Hr. Gamey, the banker, to
lave it dsolared that the two children bora et the panes,
Nary. Jary Gamer, wholwas lately sad mill the need
divorce his wife, prior to that divorce were aloes the &Min
of his marriage, sad am such slam retitled to the advaotagss
of a settlomast made by him for the betroth.' his obddras,
to the ezolusion of a clad which had bees bora of bar sires
bar idoest with her late husband'. groom.
The Widier-Geaerel, Hz F. Kelly, Hr. Holt, Sir H.
Oakes, Serjeard Ballaatioe, Ms. Wilford, Mr. Hattori, and
Mr. G. N. dolt are is the sea
The opsaisg is yet rumeseladad.

0017112 OF 007010 N PLlA3.—Arir.n. 28.
Wimp is all000.—(Before Lord Chief Juana Ma sad
Justine, Mink Byte, and Boating.)

MUNRO 9. =mar AND incrism.•

By Oeorp Honymen dhe part or the derided,
moved for a role edling upon the plaintiff to show mum
why he should sot give security for ads ; sad stated that
the dristmetenem of the cam WON very podia& The
aide was brought by a gentlessaa who rallied himself
Beres Zycliaski sealant Mr. Maltby, hie father-ii.kw,
who wee • clergyman of the church of &chid, end Mr.
Oampben, ea attorney at Nottingham. to recover
damages
for fable impriasemest. The plaintiff mom overtt
country and bemuse a waiter to Mies Maltby, whom he
seeded in October, 1860. They travelled about to
miens plum, but la consolornos of his Doodad his wife
had to leave him, and when he came to Loodos
he was gives into custody by hie father.in-law,
fer obtaining 4001. upon Nee pretences. Early in 11161 the
pressed Mice wasbrought, and in Aprh of that your
application was made that the plaintiff should give security
far week bat Mr. Justice Williams refused to make the
order, Span the pound that the plaintiff swore that he bad
noiateatioe !deem England, hutment to reside hire wisd-
om wee the remit of the action. The next eirousistam wan
that the bemoan obtained a divorce for cruelty and did.
tarn ad the proof plaintiff was ordered to pay the erste,
but thole' room bad amid against him payment bad not
ices obtained. The plaintiff had written a letter to the
brother of Mr. Maltby, in which be said that hie for.
hue would not permit him to dram the mar
eery hinds to ram on the Mies, sad therefore
be had made an arrangement with certain perms. That
speculators would dram 1,0001. in addition to the
id dram, and dual he had speed to give up all
"Tiand intered to the speculators. The writer added
the! was much afraid that when the lawsuit was ended,
the Maltby family would be ruined, as the spaselatme
would carry off the whole, sad that he wee aimed that he
would get merino= damages and interest, basun he yea
informed that hie government had demanded 'addictive
from the English government for the way in which he had
bees treated. For these reasons he desired to come to some
nesieside mincemeat. The learned amid added that
they led ne mesas of seeertainiag where the plaintiff now
de, and he submitted that it was dearly ame for security
kr mite.—Bale granted.

COURT OF PROBATE AND DIVORCE.
Area S.
Wore Ho Judie Ordimazy.)

NOWT O.IDDIT AND DULL

In rebuses to application in this are,
fiir 0. Cromwell took ooeuion to observe that defences
wen somostames made, really by the oo.respondent, but beg
the raw of the wife, and at the exposes of the husband.
If the °out weld auly bring home such a practice to an at-
torney, it would take care that he should not appear before
it for souse time to some.
IifONN v. Wren AND ANNISTON.
Ia leis ems a special jury bed found a verdict for the
petitioner. with 2,0001. damages apart the 00-respoodeet.
Who bed not appeared is
tst served advection:mat.
Mr. Kerslake, QC. (wra
ith him Dr. Spinice and Mr. Bowie)
stored far a rule nisi for a new trial on the ground of mire-
septioe of iridium% and of the verdict beim against the
weight of evidence. The learned weasel eesaoaissd of the
prejudice which bad been excited against his client by the
fact that Mr. Appleton bad loft the oountry on scoount
pecuniary difficulties, and had thus apparently confused
the charge. The petitioesr, Oaptain Elphiostome Stow, re-
turned from India en the 18th of May, 11381. Ile mot to
cohabit with his wife at Badleigh &Marto% De-
vonshire, and on the god of J , 1883, the
wee °Defined of a child, of which petitioner
denial the paternity. The learned counsel wateeded that
thew sour had been a cue in which a lady had bees found
C=l adultery on evidence so slight. F.videnoe al
"ty between the respondents there was nose. The
*widows that the child was a mature ow was also illusory,
and the alleged eonfeeaions of the respoodent had clearly
never been merle. The informant in the reception af evi-
dence woo a letter at the t's which the learned
judge had allowed to be put in by the petitioner.
- Six 0. Creswell was perfectly satisfied that the admitaium
of MU letter was right ; and as to the other question, he
would road the evidence again before he decided whether
or sot there should to a rule.