The Express.
London, England, 1852-08-12 00:00:00

(RATION AGENTS.

LIABILITIES OF

_MANSION-110M.

Mr. Mew Woolley, ship-broker, of Cullum-street,
Lime-street, appeared in consequence of the Lord Mayor's
postponement of the ease of breadth of contract, upun
which be was summoned by Mr. Bastard, of Portsca, whom
be had engaged to provide with a passage on board the
Prince Alf to Port Phillip. The case had been ad-
journed in order that the defendant might argue by conn-
ed against the construction put for the complainant upon
the Plumage's Act, 1149, by Mr. Woutner, who contended
that the 32nd section sanctioned his client's demand of the
return of the deposit money, and reasonable remuneration
under the sum of IW., for the loss and hiconvenience sus-
tained by him by the delay. Aldermen }lnnis presided.
Mr. Bailin:dine, as counsel fur the defendant, said the
case, the particulars of which were detailed in the news-
papers of the day, was one of considerable importance to the
public, as well as to his client, who resisted an enor-
mously exaggerated claim, against the principle of which
ho considered it to be his duty, as a commercial man,
most energetically to oppose. It was not Mr. Woulley's in-
tention or wish to conceal any error ho might have com-
mitted in the course of the transaction referred to. The
vessel had been appointed to sail on the 7th of July, and
the defendant was as much disappointed as any other per-
son at the delay which had taken place, and which was
attributable to a concurrence of unforeseen and inevitable
difficulties. The claim was made upon the authority of the
32nd section of the act, and if any one was liable under that
section it must be admitted that the defendant was the
person ; but that liability wax in this instance most empha-
tically denied. The object of the legislature in framing
the act was to protect the pourer classes and to establish
for them a security against the dangers of being thrown
upon the world. The learned count:el then contended at some
length against the applicability of the 32nd section to the
case before the alderman. He denied that his client had
committed the permanent " default" which the act insist
have meant in speaking of delay arising from the neglect,
refusal, or " default " of tho owner, or other responsible
persons, without saying ene word about time. The con-
tract could not be said to be violated. There was the ship
ready fur the complainant. He could obtain his passage.
' 'There was plenty of room, and the emigration commis-
sioners had passed their approbation upon the arrange-
ments. It was true that delay hail taken place, but the
32nd section had not provided a penalty for time. In the
33rd section, however, which was the section under which a
pecuniary demand could be made, and the liability to
which his client had never for • moment doubted, or ob-
jected to the emigrant was entitled to a shilling a day for
the delay after the time fixed for departure. Now the
defendant had determined to exceed that allowance, and to
art under a degree of liberality not contemplated by those
who hail framed the measure. In strict terms people who con-
tracted to perform certain acts were obliged to be punctual
in the performance ; but it would be very hard if, when a
vessel was appointed to sail one day, and was detained by
uncontrollable circumstances beyond that day, every pas-
senger on board should come forward and demand his
money and recompense for the inconvenience to which he
might say he was subjected by the temporary disappoint-
ment.

Alderman Fianis—Tho act gives the shipowner or agent
the option of procuring a passage in another veracl within
41$ hours.

Mr. Ballantine admitted that fact, and proceeded to ar-
gue upon the absurdity of the wording of the section, which
omitted the mention of the time at which the vessel was to
sail ; and thus, he contended, left the passenger completely
at the mercy of those who might be disposed to
act according to the letter. Ile called the attention
of the alderman to the lb $ 16 Victoria, which, although
not yet in operation, he was justified in referring to as a
proof of the inadequacy of the act upon which the present
complaint was founded, and intended to supply the defi-
ciency by stating that within ten days from the expiration
of the contract an eligible ship must be procured iu the
event of disappointment ea to the original vessel. The
learned counsel concluded by expressing his hope that the
alderman would not, by his decision, subject emigrants to
the formidable dangers which must arise from the net of
compelling agent. to send out vessels without the necessary
preparations for long and hazardous voyages, end enable in-
dividuals liable to change of inclination and opinion to
barns, men who were conscientiously performing their
duty with expense and anxiety and useless litigation.
Mr. Wontner, for the complainant, said the case was, in-
deed, of very great public importance, as the learned
counsel had stated, for it applied in the most powerful and
intelligible manner to the innumerable passengers who were
daily leaving England for foreign countries, and who, if
the regulation contended for were not enforced, would be
at the mercy of unprincipled agents. It appeared that in
the Times newspaper of that day, which reported the pro-
ceedings of the Mansion-house on the preceding day, there
appeared the decision of the Liverpool stipendiary magi-
strate upon the very subject to which the attention of the
Lord Mayor bad been called.
Mr. Ballantine objected to such an authority, and &leo
said the two cases were dissimilar.

Mr. Wontner said there wes the strongest similarity
between the cases, u must be observed by all who
had read the statements in the same paper. In the
Liverpool case the magistrate had decided that the claimant
was entitled to his deposit, and to remuneration for his loss
and inconvenience, and there was no reason why • London
magistrate should not put the same genuine construction
upon an act of parliament which bad been obviously made
for the protection of persons in the condition of his client,
who had contracted for his passage in a ship which was to '
sail on a particular day. The owner or agent was certainly
bound to abide by the contract. It was to be expected
from him that he was so much muter of his own business,
and so cognisant of his own concerns, as to know whether
be was able to go upon a particular day. The very word-I
ing of the clause which compelled the owner or agent to
provide • purge in another ship within 48 hours, in the
event of disappointment, settled the qu-stion in the opinion
of every rational preen who happened to look into it. It said
in mercy to the owner or agent You shall have the oppor-
tunity of procuring the substitute within a limited pe-
riod.' It wee clear, then, that the contract had been vio-
lated. It could not be aril that the complainant having
performed his part of thecontract, must go when the owner
or agent chose. That was, it would appear, the sen-
tence passed upon him, fora month had elapsed from the
lint assurance of the time of starting, and the vessel was
not ready yet. Mr. Wontuer proceeded to show that the
32nd section of the act completely applied to the ease of
his client, and concluded by repeating his client's claim to
the return of the deposit of 10 guineas, and 61., as recom-
pense for the loss and inconvenience he had incurred by the
delay.
Alderman Finals said the subject war certainly of very
great .mportance to the public, and he had given to it a con-
sideration proportionate to his sense of its peculiar claims.
The owner or agent must return the ten guineas given '
r a deposit by the complainant. The paper which
had been signed by Mr. Woolley was to all
intents and purposes a bona Ade contract.
It stated the ship was to sail on, or, according to
the alteration made by Mr. WooUey's clerk, " about" the
7th of July. Now, if this ship had been ready within a
reasonable time, there would have been no occasion to apply
for adjudieation to the magistrate ; but the delay had been
unreasonable' and Mr. Woolley himself, in the letter he
had written, admitted the strong points of the complainant's
case. The 33rd section, which awarded a shilling a day
in payment of expenses incurred after the time appointed
for sailing, did not apply to the present cane. The com-
plainant must have 6J., which he was out of pocket by the
delay. He wished to be distinctly understood as having
been influenced in giving this decision by the circumstance
of the " unreasonable delay."
Mr. Brinier said the admitted canoe of the adjudica-
tion was important to the defendant, who would certainly
act in compliance with the order of the alderman, at the
mane time that be would appeal against the judgment.
The defendant acknowledged that the delay was unreason-
able, and therefore would pay the full demand of the com-
plainant, but he would put the principle to the test at the
quarter sessions.
Alderman Finnic—When will the Prince Alfred sail for
Port Phillip ?
Mr. Ballantins---To-morrow.

jacieinireiinnis:.Vi7l4;hould not all these gentlemen
who seem so impatient to go at once resume their photo in
the vessel. If they do they will reach their destination
sooner than they will if they look atter another ship, with
all its possible delays and unavoi..able impediments ?
Mr. Wontner said his client was not disposed to go in
the vessel for the reasons stated on the former day. He
believed there were ten or a dozen who were of the same
wry of thinking.
Mr. Ballantine—Then Mr. Woolley will answer a sum-
mons from every one of them. Bach shall stand upon his
own merits. _

Alderman Finnis—lt is a great deal better to coma to
some arrangement, wbich may prevent dissgreeablo alter-
nation.

Mr. Ballantine—My client, Mr. Woolley, is disposed to
give the whole of the emigrants who complain of delay •
passage in his vessel immediately, and he is willing to leave
the terms of recompense to the arbitration of Captain Lean,
who is so efficient and honourable • public officer, and who
will, no doubt, gladly ur.dertake the task of amicable inter-
' position.
Alderman Finnis—There is no perion to whom I can
p 'int who is better adapted for the office of impartial me-
diator.
The great body of the emigrants who attended then ex-
pressed their willingness to abide by the arbitration of Cap-
tain Leen, the government emigration agent ; and thus the
case, which excited a vast deal of curiosity iu the city, ter-
minated.

Mr. Oull, who gave evidence in the matter on Tuesday,
was, by mistake, said to have stated that the emigration
agent had surveyed the provisions on board on Wednesday
instead of Saturday last.

METROPOLITAN SCHOOL OP PRACTICAL ART:
WOOD ENGRAVING CLANN.—The wood•engraving dam of
the female students of the Metropolitan School of Practical
Art is about to be re-organised, and removed from Gower-
street, to Marlborough-house, and to be placed under the
direction of Mr. Thompson, who certainly ranks among the
very first of the European engravers on wood. Instead of
meeting only twice in the week for two hours, the clue is
to meet daily (ezeept Saturdays) for three hours, and an
effort will be made to render the instruction as efficient as
possible. The great defect among our wood engravers is
their inability to draw. It will be a principal object to care
this, and we understand that no pupil will be admitted
into the clue who cannot give proud of en ability to draw
well from solid forms. The fees hitherto have been merely ,
nominal, but will hereafter be raised to a point somewhat
more nearly approaching the value of the instruction
afforded. The clam will commence its operations the first of
neat month.

THE LATE ACCIDENT ON MR LONDON
AND NORM WESTERN RAILWAY.

Yesterday the inquest was opened at boeicer'a
Gate, Ilampton-in-Arden. before W. i Poole, E... 1 . rtla-
the to the death of Mr. Bedington, who was kill, d by the
accident on this line of railway, full particular& of which
have already appeared in the Dotily News.
Mr. Bedford, Mr. M'Connell, Captain Bruyeres, and Mr,
Cleather, solicitor, from the othee of Mr. Carter, appeared
on behalf of the company: and Mr. E.lat, aoliettor, repre-
senting Mr. Ald. Hawke', of Birmingham, appeared for the
widow and Edam's of the deceased.

111rTioielitejriyVri;;;;;;rn, Mr. East (addressing the
I coroner) said-1 appear fur the widow and friends of the
deceased; I should like to know whether we Anil have the
benefit of Mr. Maedale's evidence, he having made an ex-
amination of the state of the engine and fire-box.
Coroner—You are aware that you are here by the COW-
, tray of the court?
Mr. Ewa—Certainly.
Coroner—Then after the jury are sworn, we shall take
your suggestion into consideration.
Before the jury retired to view the fractured ash-pen the
coroner addressed them, lie said: I must request that you
will not form any opinion relative to this important inquiry
until you have heard the evidence of all the witnesses. and
the reason I make that observation is, that I was in the
I rem at Coventry during a part of the time they were hold-
ingl the inquest there, end I observed that one or two of the
jury had made up their minds from the first. That is nut
right; because we all knew, as men of the world, that
what may appear conetusive after a story is told on one side
in very often explained away when other evidence is brought
against it; therefore I trust that no opinion will be fanned
by you until the close of the inquiry.
Juror—We are disposed to du justice to all parties. We
should like to make this as much an indepenikni Union's'
possible, and to have all the fresh evidence we can.
Coroner—You see things get into the newspapers, and of
1 course you are fully aware of what has taken place at
Coventry ; hut that is not fur our guidance here.
The inquiry was then formally commenced; Mr.
Robert Bedington, of Acton New-town, Birmingham,
swore to the identity of his brother's body, who was 34
years of age.
The:jury, therefore, retired, and, assisted by the cern-
yany's ecryants, made a minute examination of the ash-pan
and its appendages.
The company's servants were then cunt d, who gave evi-
dence as to the circumstance conw•cted with the accident;
all this has already appeared in the Ihuly News in the
course of the report of the inquest which LOOK plate at
Coventry, and as the testimony of these pervoc• in no ma-
terial point varied from that which has already been
published, it is unnecessary to repeat it.
William Jenkinson, the driver of In 4 engine, merely con.
firmed rather than added to his former evidence, as to the
duty of engine-drivers relative to their examination of en-
gines before they went out. On this point tie said, " It's
our duty to see that the engine is thoroughly in repair. I
looked over my engine before I wed out on the morning of
the accident. The tire was in at tile time. I always ex-
amined my engine every day after I have done work. This
engine has been sent in for repairs two or three times since the
''2nd of July." Relative to what lie observed immediately
prior to :he accident, the witness said--" I did not rce any-
thing on the rails: at the time I started from Birmingham
everything appeared to be in its pro per place." [mt.. repai re"
to which the witness referred seem to have been on one oc-
casion at Is-set for two rivets and one strap in connexion
with the uh-pan; bitch was not shown to have been the
case in the " repairs of engines book " produced in the
course of to-day's inquiry, but the witness said that this was
the fact.]
In the course of the investigation the jury expressed a
wish to have an opportunity of seeing the engine from a
"pit," in order that they might more completely inspect it.
Mr. M'Conneli accordingly ordered is special train to the
Ilampto i station, where this accommodation was afforded,
whither the jury at once proceeded. On their return an
hour afterwards, the inquiry was resumed.
Jenkinson was re-called on their return. Ile was ques-
tioned by the coroner as to whether the engine No. 1.i3 had
run off the line a month since very nearly at the spot where
the accident occurred. The witness replied in the negative,
but he said " She is a very bad engine to backwards on a
curve, though I never remember to have had her off the
line."

By Mr. East—We were going at the rate of forty miles
an hour. I did not examine the engine the night before
the accident. I examined her in the morning. The tire
was in her at the time, hut did not go in a pit to do so.
Mr. East—l observe that by rule 3.i the ',river 6to re-
port to the stationmaster, or some other penon at a prin-
cipal station, as to the state of the engine. Now, to your
knowledge, .s there any other inspection of the engine ex-
cept that which you make
Witness—Not as I am aware of.

Mr. E.uit—So that the state of the engine depcnds en-
tirely on yourself?
Witness—That's more than I can tell.

Coroner—You can tell.

Witness—Well, I suppose there is not.
Mr. East—liqw is it that if you reported the state of the
uh.pan, and there were repairs made, that no note of the
fact appears in the tt engine repairs book ?"
Witness—l don't know, but the repairs were made.
Mr. East—To whom did you report the fact on the 22nd
of July that the ash-pan of the engine required repairs ?
Witness—l was working with the smith, and I mentioned
to him that one or two of the stays of the ash-pan were
bad; this was either on the night of the 22nd or on the
morning of the 23rd ; the repairs were done. lam not
certain whether 1 mentioned this to the person having
charge of the repairs book.
By Mr. Cleather— Something might be found out after I
had reported, and the work would he done. I am not
aware that it is the duty of the foreman to examine every
engine at the end of each day's work.
Mr. Abraham Marshall, the superintendent of locomo-
tives at Birmingham, said—l was in constart attendance on
the engine 153 at Birmingham from the time it arrived
from Rugby on the morning of the accident until its de-
parture. I examined it ; that is, I looked round the en-
gine, and saw that its working parts were good. I did not
go into a pit for the purpose, and by such an examination as
I made I could not have seen a flaw in a stay or screw.
This engine is not at home at Birmingham, so 1 have never
had occasion thoroughly to examine her.
Mr. East—Now, we have understood that your duty
would be to examine this engine, if you had a report from
the driver; it would also be his duty to examine it; now,
is there any third person charged with a similar duty ?
Witness—There is not.

Mr. Cleather—Do you minutely examine, every day, the
state of the engines under your care at Dirminghlun?
Witness—Yes.
Mr. Cleather—And do bon make a report weekly u to
their state ?
Witness—Yes.
__

Capt. Bruyeres—M e shall show that every engine is
thoroughly examined when ills at borne.
By the Coroner—lf any report had been made to me by
the driver as to the state of this engine, and of its need of
repairs, I should have repaired it.
Mr. Crawford, the superintendent of locomotives at
Rugby, was next culled. His evidence in chief was similar
to that which he gave at Coventry.
John Stephenson, a smith employed at the Rugby sta-
tion, swore to the fact of his having assisted in putting
three new bolts to the fire-box of 153 engine, and four new
bolts for the ash.pan. The repairs to the stay were done
by his father. This was on the 23rd of July.
Mr. Letts, a passenger by the Leamington train, wee
nest examined. His evidence has already appeared in the
Daily News. The witness described the finding of a piece
of iron, three feet in length, placed in a triangular form
uptight on the line a short space before the spot where the
carriages left the rails. Thu was not seen by any other
person, neither did the witness himself immediately inform
the company's servants that he had made this discovery.
He described, toe, an appearance of " ploughing" on the
Birmingham side, a few yards beyond the spot where the
piece of iron was picked up.
Mr. William Ballard, a builder, residing at Leamington,
also a passenger in the down-train, expressed an opinion
that the break van of the up-train left the rails by reason of
its being so lightly laden, there being only two small boxes
in it. He had heard, too (he said), that a lady at Hampton
station new the break-van Jumping on the rails as the train
Mr. Mr. Bedford—None of the persons at the station know
anything of this occurrence.
Juror (to witness)—Did you see sny such piece of iron on
the line as that described by the last witness ?
Witness—No, I did not.
Bond, a porter in the service of the Midland Company
at the Hampton station, was called, but he swore that he
had not heard of any such statement as that to which Mr.
Ballard had referred.

Coroner—This idea of Mr. Ballard's is quite conjectural,
we have a cau e in the fall of the as►-pan, its not worth
while to look further.

At this stage of the proceedings an adjournment took
place until next Tuesday morning, meanwhile a practical
engineer unconnected with the company in to inspect the
ash-pan and fittings, and report the state thereof to the
jury.

The following is an extract from a letter written by a
youth in the train at the time of the accident to his friends
In Birmiegham ; it was dated London, August 5 . " I never
witnessed such a scene in all my life, and how I escaped
being killed was truly miraculous; as I was in the MAO
carriage with Mr. Bedington, and strange to say I was the
farthest from the door and he was the nearest it ; there was
but three of us in the carriage, and as soon as the up-train
was off the rails it shook the door of our carriage open, sad
the person to my bit hand jumped out, me following as
quick as possible, but whether I caught Mr. Iledington's
foot, or whether my foot caught the bottom of the
carriage I can't tell, but I fell out head first, and as lack
would have it my legs fell over, and I rolled into the ditch,
and at the very same instant Mr. Bedington cried oat,
"For God's sake come to my assistance, for my legs are
entangled." In the space of a few more seconds the engine
of the Leamington tram ran straight into the carriage that
he war in and knocked it on to the bank ; he must have
fell under the carriage, and the wheels ran over him, as he
was cut all to atoms. Ilia liver lay in one place, his kid-
neys in another, and various portions of his skull in a third.
I must say I never witnessed such a sight iii my life. I got
off very comfortable, merely losing a tooth and getting •
few bruisee in different parts of my body and my clothes
torn; but I am now getting all right, and I hope to begin
to work on Monday. I have been to the railway company,
and they have given me 7i." &e.

Taz EmientAtioN MOVEMENT iff beginning to tell.
At a fair held recently in Wiltshire where I.iliourcrs are
hired, there was a great scarcity of the latter, in fact, nut
one-half equal to the demand.

EXTRAORMINARY
AST ACH CALERGYRGE OMAN.F FORGERY
AGAI

WOZCZSTIII, WiD,17.11 DAT.

The magistrates of this city were engaged fester-
gq N mu-litigating a charge of forgery preferred by Mr.
w i I'. Hugh.", whetter, late mayor of Worcester,
aiuus.t the Ewe. James Nisbett, formerly of Cleabury Moe-
r. Salop, but up to last autumn curate of Shrawley,
oar Won, ger. The present charge had been preferred
by MT. lily:hill as far bark es last November, when the
r Ma
. asininoned to answer it, hut neglected to ap-
'woe LiVil a warrant was trued fur his apprelsen-
L-▪
e., but he had conirived to evade pursuit until Saturday
kg. when he was apprehended by Inspector Oloseop at
girmioatouit.
the broiiig of the charge was deferred till 2 o'clock, in
NONVICII, of the receipt of a telegraphic despatch directed
to the aitt MIL luagiatrate to the effect that a professional gem
cr„,..14 wee than on his way from town to defend the
rooter, and requesting the case might be delayed till his
This gentleman, who announced himself as Mgt
colhnitridg,. of London, having arrived, and it having bees
nee 3 that there were several charges against the stewed..
t'-at of uttering a forged bill of exchange fur 3001. was Sid
gone tato.
Mr. lloglics, who condacted his own ease, deposed that
a .111, stor. namling at Wore. ster ; that at the latter
Ind of r, Moat's, or beginning of March, WI, the prisoner
• to Mut for a loan of 3uol. He represented himself
to he the proprietor of an estate in Ireland, printed portico-
L,r. of which he gave to witness, and which he produced.
11. -4441 he *Shed it as a temporary loan, intimating that
pr should want a larger sum to pay off certain mimeos
pUne• • upon the raid estate ; that on the 3rd of March he
tabled VI Mk MB a bill of eschange, which the witness also
roamed. 'the following is a copy
" Loudon, March I, 1831.
44;00/.—pia months after date pay to the Hee. James
Nisbett. or order, the sum of three hundred pounds for value
rH.le. d. " RR-nano Mtreftam..
lo Witham Robert Nisbet!, Fort Solicit, Burrie.a.Bane,
Irmand.
Ampted. Robert Nisbett Payable at Messrs.
Seott and ro., hunker., Cavendish-square, London."
The prisoner endorsed his name on the back, "James
so.sett." Wanes, soiled hint who Itiehard Mitchell, the
osu,rs sea.. He replied that he was a clerk in the goods
&pigment at the Nine Elms smelt's at Vauzball. Ho
a., asked him who the acceptor was. He said it was his
tasat, liviug on the estate referred to, and he pointed out
Li iloaription and occupancy in the printed particulars
wathmid. the faith of thew and other repreeenta-
tem adores agreed to discount the bill, allowing him 2:41.
for the note, and retaining 44f. as discount. 11e paid him
1,, as enter on has agent in London. When the bill fell
4,- it was returned to witness dishonoured, endorsed by
the hastier "acceptor not known." It was returned
alrrat the bib Sept. Witnen thereupon sent a letter to
'Chinn at the Nine Elm. Station, and it was returned
tl4roseh the Ihnd-letter Office endorsed "not known."
lh u 4 st tit *OM hthi a letter to Wm. Rohl. Nisbett, the
soe,4tor, addressed as on the bill, but this letter was re.
tamed. marled " gnus to America." Upon this he sent •
biter to the rammer, deforming him et the circumstance,
which be replied, impressing his surprise and disappoint-
rx.st at the dislinewar of his brother's acceptance, end
gal.ng he would make nts for the payment of it
ash as little delay as =siedt day or two after receipt
Chia letter witness NM the prisoner at Shrawley Rectory,
sal told Min he bad dienneved there was no Richard /Att-
ila:: at the Nine Elms Station. Ile said it was • mistake,
t r be ea. 44111 a clerk in the goods' department there.
pit., this ihterview witness received another letter from the
en•mcr, which he produced. He believed both letters awil
the whole of the forged bills to he in the prisoner's handwrite
The ism litter was dated London, Sept. 13, amt stated
thit the prisoner had men Mitchell, who bad informed
bin that his brother was under the impression that the
I::: soul.; not fall due until the 6th October. and asking
fa little time. It further stated that Mr. Mitchell was
then connect', with the Northern Railway and had been
asee Jane. On receipt of this letter witness applied to the
trod Northern Railway C•ampany, and found tkat se
Mechell hail Men there either at the date of the ecceptesse
sr tr two >tan previously. He also found that the ',s-
equoia' the bill had been in America two or three rms.
Its prisoner left his residence at Shrawley is Nowahrie
lot, atter the summons was issued, and witness had set
wen er heard of him since till Nat Saturday, although
rot search had been mane fur him, and the police is
Lydon and elee where had been on the lookout since that
The witness was croamegansintrel by Mr. Colliagridge,

but nothing important was 'bested.
lb. prisoner admitted that he had reesived the money,
rot fanner stated that he told Mr. Hugh,* t►e drawer
‘t the bill was • man of straw ; bat this the witness
dewed.

Ana some conversation, Mr. Collingridge asked for a
TIM.III I. to enable him to produce Mitchell, which he had
r. yet had time for ; and else applied to have the prisoner
attained to bail in the mean time. The prisoner was then
r, minded till Saturday, and bail refused. Application
• made to have the prisoner's mere, which had been
by Inspector Glossop, rosiored to him, and it was
iv. id that all 'opera which did NM affect the case should
gins; up. Inspector Meow psegnind: a letter which
:. bad taken from the ptadsag, API= the contents of
stuck and from other paprrs iond uppe him, it might be
.11:,rred that thy prisoner is cennteinrcl with a systematic
pug of swicdlen.