The Express.
London, England, 1863-11-19 00:00:00

1863.

lab) ilutdlfenue.
COURT OF COMMON PLIAB.—Nev. 18

aflip fa Beam —Molar* Lord OW Javan Me and
Justices Willisioa sad Heathis.)

WILSON T. [LEMAN, :FORMATION OF ♦ NUMMI COMPANY.

"ice Plaintiff in this ass wes a proforma of agriculture
in Edinburgh, and the defendant was the owner of a mineral
estate in Sweden. In the spring of 1861 the defendant and
the owners of two adjoining estates worn desirous of este-
bli.bing a company to work iron and copper mime upon the
property, and the defendant entered lute communication
with the plaintiff, who agreed to go to Sweden to inspect
and report upon the property, in consideration of being paid
his expenses and 5 guineas a-day. It was further agreed
that if the company were formed the plaintiff should in
addition mare I,OW. in paslup share', and also an allot-
ment of LOCO deferred shares at a subsequent
period. The report wee made, and a acapects.
of the intendedcompany was issued, art sbareho were
net obtained, and the company wee aver foamed in the way
intended, bat the landowners themselves combined, and in
that way teemed a art of soinpay to week the mass.
The pisatiff sued to recover demos for breaak of the an -
Mast to deliver the shares to him, end at the trial at Child-
itail the jury firma for the plaintiff fat 1,0001. The spew
tice sow was whether a rule should be made absolute for •
Barth era new trial.

appeared to show cause ; sad Mr. Ma.
they, Q.C., sad Kr. O. Pollak to Bayport the rule.
neleritOldedJuetios mkt that le was of misfire that the
rule it.sl be made absolute fit a neosuit. 1,4 the Mos
the onstreal was made the wee' anticipated that a Goer-
pony Weld be formed in tie ordinary mem of the word ;
that shareholders should Dore in. mod that the persons
f the eampsay sheath give essithime re the
to mm 7 au the proposed week. The
report ef Mr. Wilson was most satidectery, bat
or few perm= mare forward I. tab therm, the
dinner. dmickd that the prefect bad failed, and that
the compasy was are farmed ; end the deposits paid were
Nee this mood refereed. AU thin beppreed is 1861. hut
ia the &Dewing year the landholders thenreelme formed a
emporattes to work the mime, but so had shares
except the leadhaiders, who themselves a emits'
of 200,0001. is porticos regulated weesding te the vase of
the respective estates. Thy lestever woe es merely
different company to that whisk Mr. Wise wee desired to
ski iv (deicing• so Resumes *ceded wag the
mines, and the money got was by niorleging the
eskee
licks absolute.

SHERIFFS' COURT, RID LION-SQUARZ.
(Beim Kr. Usderawrlff Harebell sad a Jury.)
112AVY DAMAO= MUM Ttif ItIDLLND
Al this evert yeeMrhey a ares, " Heiler v. The Midland
Railway Oompsay," wMell owmpled several how; err
tried to Tem, compsseatke he Werke reesived IS the
company's Ilse at Market Harberoech Asir* 1981
The pleieW is a tailor awl diaper et Hipsweil, Lister,
sad tieVellell from Leedom. A trine wee behind the lids
le which he wee a , sad • Wham took phew The plaintiff was Wend, sad eppeared ia
bad maw The amain were hid M MOM Hie ism of
profs was 5004., sad est UK a yew. Beidearms wee gives
of bins ooeditios, cad it wee proved he (weld est rower
from the effete of the aseideet. His bashes= w early
Mat for Inas of , He kept the peetelSce at
HiperelL
The ripazosea:,oooldmeye agate* the ereepaa).
Mr. Bb sad Mr. XinweLlsir ware for the plain-
tiff ;11r. y, Q.C., sad Mr. Field for the essepaay.