The Express.
London, England, 1852-11-18 00:00:00

_ .
RIIIPONDZNI.

This ease stated that John Moore, the appellant, objected
to the name of James Seeders, whose qualification was
described as freehold land In Carisbrooke Fields, called
Edward's Lead, in the Isl. of Wight. The facts were,
tout the claimant owned the land for which he claimed,
worth 61. a year, and also other land, worth 501. a year,
but the whole of this property was mortgaged for 3001.,
and the annual interest was 151. Each part of the land
was liable to the whole of this interest, and it was cony
tended that the revising barrister had no power to appor
tion the interest .o different parts of the property. If the
interest could not be apportioned, the whole of It would be
set off against the value of the qualification, which it
would swallow ap. The revising banister, however, held
that he could apportion the interest, which he did, and re.
Mined the name of the claimant upon the list.
The court held that he was right in so doing, end affirm&
the decision.

FIDDOX, APPILLAWE e. BhleTlllll, RWIPONDINT.
The question in this ease was r to the seflicieney of
notice of objection, the objector describing himself r on
the list of freemen for the city of Carlisle. It appeared that
there were two lists of freemen, one for corporal*, and the
other for parliamentary purposes, and they did not neces-
sarily retain the same names. This notice It was contended
ought to state that the *NOM!. WY on the parliamentary
list in order to show that he was entitled to object.
Mr. Temple appeared for the appellant, and Mr. Mellor,
Q.C., for the respondent.
The sort took time to consider the matter.
CAIMS STRUCK OUT.
- -

The following cases were struck out In consequence of
defects in th, proceedings : " Newell, appellant, v.
Balm, Town Clerk ot Derby, respondent," and" Barker,
appellant, v. Palmer, respondent.'

CONSISTORY COURT.—YEarraDAT.
Basoas Da. Loasuseica.
STORY O. STORY.

In this ease, which was a suit brought by Mn. Story for
the restoration of conjugal rights., the defendant had been
admonished to take his wife home, and behave kindly to-
wards her. Mr. Story, however, bad not complied with
the monition ; and bad even made an unsuccessful applica-
tion to the courts at Westminster, to restrain this court
from proceeding further.
Mr. Cricket, the proctor for Mn. Story, now moved that
the court do pronounce the defendant in contempt.
The defendant, who appeared in Knots, pleaded that he
bad gene to the address of his wife, as given in one of her
aMdavits, and that she was there dented to him. It was
therefore Impossible for him to havecomplied with the order
of the soon.

Nr. Cricket observed that the defendaat bad never ap-
plied for her address. Yesterday, too, Mrs. Story went to
hie place of bu■ine.s, 62, Fleet-street, but it was representi d
to her that he did not live there.

13tory-liii• i;eldre is 15, Nottinsphill,
am you very well know, and have known so for a year.
The Court asked the defendant if he was ready and
willing to appoint a time and place at which he would re-
ceive his wife •1.. . . _

Mr. Story said that he I•sd already offered to do so. On
• previous occasion he had gone to Mr. Cricket'. office for
that very purpose ; but he bad been insulted and removed
by the police.
Mrs. Story being is court yea then aske I by Dr. Lush-
logien If sho vas desirous of going borne to her husband,
and answered la the affirmative.

The Court then calla,' upon the defendant to say when
he would receive ►er.

Mr. Story was ready to main hoot thew.
Mrs. Btory—Am I obliged to go bow laussdistsly ? (A

The Court said it could not order that; sad eventually it
was Sled that Mr. Story should attend at Mr. Cricket's
°Soso at throe o'clock on Saturday next to receive his wife.

MIDDLESEX SESSIONS.-YESTEIWAT.
Mom Y.. Ows.in. /Mum A soon terlvan..

his • Chow , a youth, surrendered, and took tnal
• as Indictment in which he was charged with haring M-
I diesatly assaulted a little girl.
lIIr. Parry and Mr. Sleigh prosecuted on behalf of a
Society for the Protection of Females; Mr. Ballantine ap-
peared for the defendant.
This is the ease in which a fortaicht ago one of the bail
set the court at defiance is reference to an lateral of his re-
cognisanoes. The facts ars unlit for publication.
The defeat* was an alibi.

The jerZ found the defendant CuWy.
The Assistant Judge said he thought really that he should
only he doing his duty by ordering the witnesses for the de-
fence to be prosecuted for perjury, for perjury the whole
of their evidence unquestionably was. lie sentenced the
prisoner to one year's hard labour.
It was stated in the report of the cam of Elisabeth
Bromwich, yeetinday, that the body of the child was found
on the Bth of May ; it &bawd have been the 27th, the day
on which the desertion took place.