The Express.
London, England, 1864-03-23 00:00:00

. .
LA A INTELLIGENCE.
(THIS DAY.)

OF PROBATE AND DIVORCE.
(Before the Judge Ordinary.)
LAN DER r. L ANDER. PART BUM.
ease, which was reported on Monday, Mr. Searle
t.onA evidence to complete the chain of identity ;
•.,art made a decree nisi with coda.
LYNAS r. NAS AND RANSON.
.0:3 fur the petitiouer.
1,1 ties were married in 1844. The petitioner, a
: I,...rmer. going home unexpectedly to his house at
..,,,,rough, found a person named Ranson with his
1. who was employed at some iron works in the
-thee had her living with him as his wife.
• • ,tj,i, with costa.
TONG T. TONG.
ka for the petitioner.
,:tainer kept the Railway Tavern, at Bolton, in
•.. she was married to the respondent,
90011 discovered to be a drunken brute.
lire to her bed while she was
it. On another occasion he broke her leg
....; k. and left her lying on the floor: for sever
. At length, in she separated from him ; and
, iwrged him with having committed adultery with

• .t ate.
• uisi with costs.
V..F‘ANDER I. ALEX %NOIR AND BOURNE.
••••.:asks for the petitioner.
• .arriage took place so long ego as 1824, and there
• issue a son and a daughter. The petitioner had
silver Cup 100 at Cromer-street, Gray's-
...•
. but he was now an undertaker. In
iiere was a separ...tion in consequence of
L ~.....;•ondent's having committed adultery with a
• : lawyer's clerk named Robinson, in Hatton-
--be afterwards went to live with one Levis, and
' • t. v with the co-respondent. The delay had been oc-
j the petitioner being under the impression that
,• -wiry to make Lev:s n co-respoodeut. and Levis
. . country. 1.1 that lie could not I, found.
• le rostpon,d i.is dy uslou until case which
„. • ~: h•-••ru the tuil sat on the queetwu of on.
. isad been dirpieed of.
Row S.
AL I Mr. Murray 'sr the petitioner.
took place in 1849, and there had been
•-; ;-en. The petitioner was a wool-buyer at
▪ in Huntingdonshire. He lived on the most
..e terms with her till the year 1862, when she met
.:•onilent in • railway carriage on her way to London.
they corresponded with each other, and once,
a, husband was away from home, she left
under pretence of going to see friends at
,_•); but it was proved that she bad committed
•.! -sigh the co-respondent at Ely. At length, on the
..•sober last, she eloped with Mr. Fisher, and had
,untry with him. In answer to an appeal which
nide to her by the husband of her half-sister, she
a. •- letter to him, in which she stated that she
:.. • give up her plans, and that she had no
.. to the future; that she was not seriously
• :',sa hundreds and thousands of others whose faults
a • -..101/1:1 to the world ; and that in future her life
• .1.1 i,. wore pleasing to God, inasmuch as it would be
first deceit. The husband was not in the least
s .• ci the estrangement of his wife till just before the
It was stated that Fisher had been a railway em-
,..,nd that he had obtained an appointment abroad.
rer nisi, with costa.
ac court then rose for the holidays, having disposed of
Cdtle which was ready for trial.

COURT OF BANKRUPTCY.
(Before Mr. Commissioner liolroyd4
IS RE srgracs HASKELL.
f“e bankrupt was a hairdresser. of Goewell•reed, Easton-
: a:, an.: other places. Debut only 1361.
k,a opposed, for the official assignee.
h.okruot was examined. and admitted that he bad
leen a i.Ji of sale on his furniture in December last for 30/.
;bra ~:raiwed. The creditor had taken possession on the
lay bef,re bankrupt presented his petition. Ile was still
,a r0e.,..0u of the furniture and carrying on his bushier.
aaid u the bankrupt only owed $7l. to on-
se ~ditora he ought to try aod make some arrange.
le:th them. The case would be adjourned three
f..r that purpose.
3!. Mr. Buchanan, and two other gentlemen
-red the case.

IN RE WY. CAMERON.
Imtkrupt was a potato salesman, of Spits.lfseMs.
'4l t.
was the sitting for discharge, the bankrupt having
pmed his examination.
z:.rgood opposed ; Mr. IL t;riffiths supported.
charge against the bankrupt was that he had made
li liable on accoirmodation bills to the amount of

hankrupt examined, said be had given a bill fur 100/.
r,lative, Mr. Gwynne, • bill.disconnter end rag-
,' haw, of Spitulfieldsmarket. He had previously
.wed money from Gas nue, and DOW coxed him 1110/.,
•vhich he had given bills ter 2001. He bad put his
un other bills, accepted by Perkins and Bell,
Lt.. a view to get them discounted. They were
to Gwynn. for this purpose, bat they had
een negotiated. For the last fifteen months hisbusi-
Lo. }Ltd been an unenceesaful one. Perkins had got the
of his premises, horse and van, sacks, and the rest of
1. -tock. Heluid been in business three years ;at tint it
• .ucceesful. His profits were 40/. or 101. a month. Had
without capital.
!' 3 Honour said that the bankrupt ought to have stopped
• he found that be could not canyon business without
of his stock and implements of trade. He did
L.• iu July last ; and every subsequent transaction was in
...011tr.,:ting a debt with/ ut probable means of payment,
to having cone on putting Lim name to bills which he knew
Lr, , • cid cot pay ; and the end of such a course of trading
coul.lordr he bankruptcy. The order must be suspended
!,r four mouths.