The Express.
London, England, 1855-04-04 00:00:00

ASSIZE INTELLIGENCE.

HOME CIRCUIT.-IEINorroN, APRIL 3.

'Vain N/L BARON PLATT AND A SPICIAL
BOYLE v. WISEMAN.
This was an acti..n brought by the Rev. W. Boyle, a
Romaa catholic priest, against Cardinal Wiseman, to re-
cover damages for a libel.
Mr. E. James, Q.C., Mr. Lush, and Mr. Wordsworth
were counsel for toe plaintiff; Mr. Serjeant Shth, Mr.
Bramwell. Q.C., Mr. Baddsley, and Mr. Willes, appeared
for the defendant.
Cardinal Wiseman,who had been sultpenaed u • witneu,
sat upon the bench during the greater part of the trial.
This cause, it will be remembered, was tried at Guildford
at the last summer wises, and on that occasion the plaintiff
was nonsuited. An application was afterwards made for a
sew trial, on the Farad tli,t the Chief Baron, who tried
the cause, bad improperly refused to admit secondary evi-
dence of the contents of a letter written by the defendant,
in shush he admitted the authorship of the alleged libel,
and that be had also ruled that the cardinal could not be
called as a witness for the plaintiff, as hie evidence would
recd to criminate himself; and upon both grounds a new
trial was directed.
Mr. James opened the cue for the plaintiff in a brief and
loquent speech He said that the plaintiff, who was a
Roman catholic priest, and a gentleman by education and
poeition, sought by the present action to recover from Cardi-
nal Wi-eraan compensation in damages for grievous injury he
had inflicted upon him by the publieation of a most false and
malicious libel. Toe jury were no doubt aware, let.m what
had already taken place, that from the enermou influence
possessed by tee defendant over the clergy under his con-
trol and every person counuected with him, the utmost drill-
, culty had been thrown in the way of the plaintiff making
out hie case and even those persona who sympathised with
t`te plaintiff, and felt that he had bees grievously ill-used
in the transaction, could with difficulty be Judaea to
come forward and give evidence in his behalf for fear of
the power of the &feudal:it and a dread of incurring his
displeasure. The learned mussel this referred to the facts
of the case, and said that the plaintiff was curate toe chapel
at Islington, being appointed by the late Dr. Griffiths, who
was at that time bishop of this diocese, and he remained in
the office until the death of that pantheism, who was sue-
areded by Cardiesl—who was then Dr. Winans. Shortly
after that the defendant went to Bea and returned with
the title of Cardinal, and upon the sesamption by hiss and
the ether clergy of the R moan catholie etthrelt of those et-
clesisatical titles which had sloth been deelared illegal, the
whole covets, was thrown into a state of incitement.
The prothedinge of the Cardinal at this time, he said, were
not looked upon with satisfaction by a great many of the
leading English catholic', who felt that they ware calculated
to east insult upon the Crown and to throw a doubt upon
their own loyalty, and the subject was disused not only in
the English catholic j 'wrists bat also fa foreign journals,
and particularly in the Onifern and Olatf de la Bilig4on,
two se ws-apers published at Paris, the former of which ad-
vocated the moduli of the cannel, sad the latter support-
ing the views of the more modems estbolies. The Univers
was notorious for its attacks noon the English nation, sad
upon everything English, and he said he should show that
the cardinal was a rentalr oserespondeat of this journal, aad
the libel which was the subject of the inquiry appeared is
that journal on the 23rd May, 1854, sal bore the signature
of the defendant. The horsed sensed then exploited that
an article had preelanely_ sowed is the Astl ads Jos
Retig' s, to which the anion web Sen by the defendant was
is to be a reply. aad I. that artiste he
made the charges agathet the plaintiff, which were the
grounds of the present action. He thou read the
libel, which charged the plaintiff with bark, bees expelled
from a society of Jesuits, of which be wee a member, and
also represented that he had, while balding the with of
curate to the church at Islington, to whisk be bad been
appointed by Dr. Griffiths, shown such a want of mei fa
the discharge of his duty, that the thersh was deserted;
and it likewise charged him with having kept possession of
the residence of the chapel thee be bad been dionthaesd
by the bishop, and is defiance of him; and ales repo-
muted that be had, by threats and latimidstica, ladeced
some of his parishioners to sign a reemmetranee to the
bishop upon the subject of his Minimal, and a request that
he might be allowed to remain is kis ogee. The name of
the plaintiff was not =satiated Mt the article is quake ;
bat there was no doubt that be was the per-
son referred to; sal be said le should be able
to show that the whole of the etatemeate I. nudism were
false, and that the defendant knew they wen se. The
leered counsel want on to state that Dr. Oakley, who was
formerly a member of the established church, but who bad
beasts a convert to the Boman catholic religion, :sod who
wee a ye/Friel% man, wee thought by the cardinal a proper
person to be appointed to the chunk at bangles, and
without any easeplsiat whatever being mode against kiss
the plaintiff was distaimed Won hie cake to make room for
the seophyte Dr. Oakley. The plaiatilK although be son-
*lend that his appointment by Dr. Griffins ought sot to
haw bees pat an end to in this meaner. never-
*llea yielded to the Mamma& c 4 the delndant,
hat having *speeded • geed deal of his own
mosey is :moiling the MN, esti providing funinn he
felt that he war entitled to the wag be had so adede
and he applied to the defendant he The how-
ever, refused to make him nay O'Brien. ad Ida
anywithout obtaining of the ram my had enpeadeL Is
the year 1830, after WS affair eauwed• he wee Waged Is
apply to the defendant for his Mennen fir what had
taken place in reference to this metes; awl after he baleen
two mow abject letters of apology, be wee admitted to the
presence of the cardinal, and he knelt down hake Um
sad received his blessing and forgiveseas. The phde-
tit, who had suffered met grit y is
of being deprived of bit odor, who had 418:=11:
depend upon for anbentesse bed a WWI stipend
of about 601. a year, which he remind Omsk the hied-
, use of Dr. Gnat. the BM* et amemmig. aell-
glom offices he posimmed la Mediating eosin& slier this
receacil:ation that as unbind heft wee anteelensi to-
wards hint by the doltsime, wad he wee estewilied to fad
that is 1854 he
' dew spa h m, and •hish was -'-shied is his pm*" es
aesealed tot* the lama sathatie abetidi. Is ea bis Mne
deeireedew. The leased *seed thew carted mat ea*
*her fasts of the eab sad said lief lbo delesiest did me
bre to pat the awed • pies et sad be
bed that be was set • awl Psi 16 view
the "gene Ye ass% img soes the
aspen`
awl,
8161110011 sit **sod mod * soden the mow* et
dense* He belleyld he dwell have me diewelly es die,
present seeedea in making est that the Modest wee the
Whet of the libel, sad whew*, jury seaddloged the 'state

of that libel, sad the other eirecostistio 'assisted with
the proisedisei of the defendant, ho felt mused they
would give non ea millet of daisies' as would rreetahllso
the character of the plaintiff and satisfy the Pieties of
the ease.

The following 'videos was then adducted :
The Bev. Harding Ivan said—l es Hoses 'Shelia
priest at Kentish-town. I sin the author of the articles
that appeared in the Alai de la Religion. There are two
parties in the Emma catholic church, a loyal party and a
party which is not, or rather an ultra party and a moderate
party. The .Allei de la Religion is the organ of the moderate
and the Miners that of the more violent party. I remem-
ber seeing the article missed . N Cardinal Winona" in
the Unifiers of the 23rd May, 1864, and I cousider it was
the answer to an uncle that appeared in the Ansi of the
loth of April, written by me. I referred to Mr. Boyle in
my article, but I bad no eaninanisation whatever
with him before I wrote it. I had not spokes to
him for saved years before this time. The article in
tbe UtSiftfl undoubtedly refers to Mr. Boyle. The
principal editor of the Ansi de la Realm* is the
Ablii Cognard. In July last year, I wee requested te.go to
Pens to ascertain whether the letter purporting to be signed
by the Cardinal was euthentio. I went to the offs of the
Ughnrs, bat previously I saw the Abbd Cognard, and be
showed me a letter which I have no doubt wee the hand-
writing of Cardinal Wiseman. (Se:Flout fibs here pro-
duced a letter, and handed it to the 'ritual, aid be said it
appeared to have been altered sines he last saw it), aad he
was not prepared to say whether it was the same, and he
was opted a that it was not) I desired the Alibi bognard
te let me have the letter in order that it might be used
before the MUM in England, and I told him with what
'dins I had come to Paris. He told me that he dared not
let me have the paper, and he said he had been so cruelly
persecuted by Cantata Wiseman that be dared not offend
him. Sines last trial I have seen the Abed Coguatd at
Paris, and urged him meet earnestly to let me have the
letter, and he refused, for the same reason. I asked him U
he would produce it himself', and he refused. 1 read the
letter, and remember its contests.
Strjeant Sbee said he should propose to prove that the
letter he had beaded to the witness was the same ke bad
seed. _ _ _

Mr. Baron Platt said it was not competent for the learned
weasel to do this except as evidence for the defendant.
In answer to questions put by Mr. Serjeant Sheer the
wittier said : Toe letter I saw corresponded in general ap-
pursues with the one now produced. The paragraph
from which I draw the inference that this is not the same is
the very first passage is it. The letter was main handed to
the witness, and be said that the first difference he re-
marked was that the letter he saw commenced Monsieur
l'Abbi, whereas the letter commenced simply " Mousieur."
There was she an erasure in the letter I saw, whereas there
is no ensure in this one. I will swear, to the best of my
belief, that the letter curnamenoed with the words Monsieur
PAbbi. I have no hesitation La swearing positively to that
fact, and I swear that the first sentence of the
letter has been altered. I will swear also that
in the original letter there were the words, "le lettre
pie jo vs.ris de podgier." I took a note of the
ecntents of the letter on the same day I saw it.
I made some interluteations in the copy of the letter same
months afterwards. I made it more complete from notes
I took is my pocket-book.
By the Court—l am satisfied the first sentence is not the
, same that was in the original letter.
Essorination continued—l took notes while I was with
1 the Abb6 Cognard. I took down the date and one or two
other matters, and wrote oat a full statement afterwards for
the use of the plaintiff's attorney. The witness then said,
that in the original letter the words were, " I have received
the letter which you wrote to me in reference to the letter
which I have Just published, in answer to the articles of the
& Amide Re ion, relating to the catholic church is +Eng-
land." Thailetter was signed by the defendant, Cardinal
Wiseman. We were aware that the Univers was under the
invitation of the Cardinal and the Abbe, and I always
examined it attentively to see if it esetained any answer
to our articles that appeared in the Amide la Religion. No
article upon the subject, except the one signed N. Cardinal
Wiseman, appeared in the ('Hirers in that form. I after-
wards saw • correct tranalation of the original article in the
Ca holic Standard, a newspaper published in London.
Serjeant Shea objected to the reception of any evidence
to show the publication in an English newspaper until
proof of the original publication in the French newspaper
was established.

Atter some argument the examination of the witness wee
proceeded wit►, and be said tbAt the article proinoed was&
correct translation of the article that appeared originally in
theUssivers. _ _ _

Mr. Bramwell still objected to the article being read.
Baron Platt Paid that it was net read as proof of publica-
tion in an English newspaper, but merely that it was a cor•
reel translation of the oripinal article.
Mr. Berjesat Shea said he offered the original letter.
Mr. Baron Platt said it was not proved to be the original

Mr. Jana sold he would not twelve the document as the
riginal kaki.

After some further disemaion the whole of the original'
letter was read in the form in which it appeared in the
i Univers. -

The Rev. Mr. Boyle was then examined. He said—l am
the plaintiff in this action. I em an Englishman, and was
iodinated for the Boman Catholic church, pertly at Stour
beret and partly in Perk. I was ordained a priest in 1833,
sad was appointed as curate to the church at Islington in
1847. Dr. Griffith, was then bishop of the diocese. I was
deo a member of an order of Jesuits. I joined that order
is 1825. I bad net reed any of the articles in the Unions
and the Amide is Religion, and was not aware of the con-
troversy that was going on in France. I retired from the
seder of Jesuits in 1846. My attention wee first called to
the libel when it appeared in the Catholic Standard, a
week after it appeared In the Univers. It is false to say
that I was expelled from the order of the Jesuits to which I
belonged. I was expelled from any religious society
in my life. The cardinal succeeded Dr. Griffiths as bishop
about six or eight menthe after I was appointed as curate
at Islington. The first intimation I received that I
was to came the performance of my duties was in
1860, when I received • letter to that effect from
the cardinal. (The letter stated that, alter fall
consideration, he bad.; come to the conclusion that a total
change of men and system was necessary at Islington, and
that be had appointed two fresh priest., and at thou= time
eared him what he described as an impatient mission at
Chichester.) I wrote en answer, expressing my disinclina-
tion to leave Islington, and I also declined the honour of
handing a mission at Chichester, for that was what I found
wse latended. The Bev. Mr. Oakley, • minister of the pro-
testant south who had become • Boman catholic, was4ap-
pentad in my place, and he still holds the office of estate of
the chapel at Islington. My church was very well attended
while I officiated. It was • very large church, capable of
holding two or three thousand pantos, and generally 1,400
sr 1,600 attended. I never opposed the power of the bishop,
but objected to his right to remove me. I received • second
letter from the defendant on the subject of my removal
hem Islington. I had no other means of obtaining a hull.
Mod except the ministration of this church. I ultimately
left. The statement in the letter of the defendant that 1
had intimidated my pariehionen and induced them to sign
memorials in my favour is not true. There wise only one
memorial in my favour, and I did not eves know of the
fast until after it had ban sent in. My parishioners were very
mach attached to me. When I took the residence of the
curacy it was • mere shell, and I had to paint and paper it,
gad laid out a large sum of money for • poor curate. I
wanted to be paid for these repairs and for my furniture
before I left, and I applied to the defendant with that ob-
ject, but I could not obtain the mosey, and the defendant
manly renewed the offer of the mission to Chichester. My
salary at Islington we. five millings • day, aid there were
certain dues which would raise my salary to theta
1601. or 1801 ear. I was obliged to take ell my furni-
ture away vW/ori, end all the money I received was 801.
801. of this was due to me for salary. I had to pay my
solicitor 201. for his eons, and the 101. lb as all I had lor fix-
tures I left is the house. Cardinal Wiseman was aware of
my intention to edsoate young gentlemen for the universi-
ties, to enable me to pay the rest and taxes of the house,
and be promised to assist me in the endeavour. Before 1
left Islington Cardinal Wiseman withdrew lay faculties.
The ruses for doing so wee because I 'eked for the money
I had impended on the house. Before the cardinal went to
Rome I wrote to him two letters of apology, and I did so
with the utmost enmity, and actuated by • desire to be re-
sompieyed. After these lettere had been written, I sewn, the
'redid, at Me mime is Golden-square. I was shown into
his remplies-109111, and I went oa my knees and asked him
for psalm and forgiveness. We were both affected sad I
left the be with Dr. Doyle, who had accompanied MIN
and I thee& all was forgotten and forgiven, and I had
done sethiag whatever to provoke him or annoy him 'math
the pried when this libel was published. After I we.
rimmed frith laithglea, by the permission of Dr. Gnat,
the Bleep of ilselkwark, I read mares in that i;letriet,
which I received ahem 404, and that is all I had to live
apes, except thaselese from my Meade. After this amiss
was hefted I ems prevented from performing this, ditty,
sad I ham bat as Mesas of smut's( myself.
lisejseat Shoe Shea asked the whams whether he had not
requested mate if his parishioners to write or sign a reams-
stream or menseeiel to the cardiaal up= the subject of his
dimsheal, sad be pat a letter into his hand at the same time.
Mr. Moyle said be was quite ready to exelain this matter.
The het wth gat Wthe Roman catholic communion,
where man se* pedsidesers were very poor and ignores;
tiosejer; priest es their father, and he was always
i Rpm la that eepsity. He frequently wrote lotion
for them, sad be remembered that he wrote that one at the
mama reesestel the party. It contained • request*, be
slimed to go to mahmisa aft Rester :to whams, Wised et
te a Meager. The same of the pines appeared to be
tom K. and he sheald like to know who It wan, m it
Weald show that he had sated most ungratefully and en-
folds la Inducing him to write the letter for the par
mismr it appeared, of handing it to the cardinal or his
ieant nee said he did net believe any signature had
keen from the letter.
Boma Platt, after looking at the document, said it ap-
posed to him that the name had evidently been torn frost
the Mtn.
hilliglasomplable misissl fileidiertallittaaseer""letenthLisittairt lamiwt:as.
aesewrellaribedtmoyeasiiml;taidUliPielftio!thtlypeuelithelh:oet °e1:11144d.;
seaiMei
Issalle. Mu was erammeaWe for the seem of the Am=
bat lie friends bed sesiMail Ida is getting lip this
, trial, Re bad meshed em from Dr. Worthiegton, a
elergymaa of the established thumb, and other gentlemen.
' Mr. Hogan, • memo imanected with the AudititMes,

and who was one of the plaintiff's eongregation at Islington
said ha bad recommit opportunities of maim, Mm, sad
always °moldered him • most pimp, miaow, and attentive
cleriyinan, and he was particularly Mod to the poor and
the sick. He also said, that when he heard of the Maw
tion of Cardinal Wiseman to rumor* him, be spostanaow4
drew spa memorial to toe Cardinal, praying that his sigh,
he allowed to remain, and la • very short time
this memorial was signed by eleven hundred of the plain.
tire parishioners. Re said he remembered wading thei
libel that appeared is the Un•vers, and it esuead himat
regret. He had so doubt that it was intended to apply to
the plaintiff.

The plaintiff was reit:ailed, and he stated that when he
left his curacy at Islington the defendant gave him a sort of
certificate of gond character. He had some difficulty is
obtaining one in the form usually given, and the defendant
wanted to make it appear bytei document that he bad
retired volentarily from the curacy.
Mr. James, in suntmiog up the cue for the plaintiff, ex-
pressed his astonishment that not a single witness should
have been called either to show that Cardinal Wiseman
was not the author of this libel, or to show tuat there wee
any foundation for the charges that bad been made against
the plaintiff, and he said the case now resolved itself merely
into a question of assessment of damages. The jury would
then have to consider what damages ought to be awarded
for the malicious attack made by Cardinal Wiseman uponthis poor harmless man, litho bad never done him any
wrong, but whom he had endeavoured to eruth with the
utmost malignity. The learned couplet then made some
remarks upon the evidence, and upon what be described
as the contemptible attempt to explain away the malicious
intention of the defendant by endeavouring to show
that the word dismissal had been used instead of
expelled, and he concluded by asking, at the hands of the
jury, for his client exemplary damages for the injury that
had been inflicted upon hiss by the defendant.
Flierjearit Shea then addressed the jury for the defendant.
The chief thing that appeared to be complained of was, that
the plaintiff was represented to have been expelled from the
Society of J unite, to which be belonged, but bet chimed there
would be no doubt, from the plaintiff's own admission,
that the word expelled had hue wed by mistake, and that
the real expression was "dismissed," which had an entirely
different signification. He said it was clear that no attempt
had been made to cut any imputation upon the plaintiff
in reference to this removal, beeause he was appointed
afterwards to another ofilee tied'? Dr. °rant ; and this
showed that there was nothing to his prejudice in the
transaction that was alluded to. Ho then called the
attention of the jury to the tut that the accusation)
would weer have been made known if the plaintiff
himself had not made it public by instituting these
proceedings; and he concluded by stating that it Cu clear
the object of Cardinal Wiseman in writing the article in
queries was not to libel the plaintiff, but to vindicate his
own ehareeter from the attacks that bad been previously
made upon it.
Mr. baron Platt, in summing up, said that he and the
jury had nothing whatever to do with either pretretant or
catbelic, and their only object was to discover the truth and
to deride according to the evidence laid before them. The
plaintiff charged the defendant with having published •
malicious libel concerning bun, sod he asked for damages
for the injury he bad sustained in consequence of
the publication of that libel; and he must say
that he could not help expressing his regret that a gentle-
man like Cardinal Wiseman, a scholar, and a man of high
attainments, should appear classed in the same category
with a malicious libeller. That the charge made against the
plaintiff *mounted in law to a libel there could be no doubt,
and a libel coming from the pen of such a man as Cardinal
Wiseman was of course calculated to have roach more
effect than if it was written by an ordinary person. The
defendant had not pleaded &justification, and by that course
he admitted that the charges be had made wire false. The
jury would therefore consider the nature of those charges,
and all the other facts in the ease, nod it would then be
their duty to say what amount of damages the plaintiff was
entitled to for the Injury he had sustained by the publios-
tion of the libel in question.
The jury, after deliberating for about twenty minutes,
returned a verdict for the plaintiff, damages 1,0001.
NORTHERN CIRCUIT.—LANCASTER, Arm 2.

EVANS r. ROBINSON.
This was an action for criminal conversation on the put
of the defendant with the plaintiff's wife, and had been
tried in August last before Mr. Justice Crowder. A new
trial, however, was granted. The Attorney-General, Sir
Alszander Coekburn (specially retained). Si rjeant Wilkins,
and Mr. Aspland, were for the plaintiff; and Mr. Waken,
Q.C., end Mr. Atherton, Q.C.. were for the defendant.
The facts will be found in the following evident*:
Mr. William Edward Lawrence, examined by Mr. See-
June Wilkins-1 live at the Onenway, in Cheltenham, and
am a magistrate of the county of Gloucester. I was pre-
sent at the marriage of the plaintiff an IWO, and am trus-
tee of the marriage settlement. 1 have known the defendant
for 110. years. His inmate is about 2,0001. per annum. He is a
magistrate, married, and lives separate from his wife. I
have often seen the defendant with plaintiff's wife, riding
as well as walking; sometimes unattended, and sometimes
with her mother. They generally rods in • carriage. I
have also seen them on horseback. When in the carriage
they have been unattended. I don't know whose hone
plaintiff's wife rode. When she was stranded by her mother
she was walking in the streets of Chsiton horn. I have seen
her rids in the defendant's carriage several timer. I saw
them rids both before and after marriage.
Croweramiued by Mr. Watson-1 have seen them in
public occasionally, perhaps ten times. Mr. Itobittron lived
in Cheltenham sixteen years. Be is about seven or eight
and forty. He has a son grown up in the Treasury. This
is Mr. Carrington sitting before me. Mr. Carrington ha
three daughters and two sons. Iu 11450 they resided with
the father. I was not on visiting terms with Mr. Carrington
before the n.arriage. Since 1842 Mr. Robissou has been a
very intimate friend of the family, constantly tinting at the
house, both before and after the marriage. When Mrs.
Evans came to Cheltenham elm was 16 or 18 years of age. I
may have teen Mr. Carrington and his daughter walking
with Mr. Robinson two or three times. I eariliot say it wu
after the marriage. I have seen the mother, in nompeny
with her daughter and the defendant, in • carriage four or
Ave timas,dri.ing is the direction of my house. The defendant
was driving the carriage. Mrs. Evans was sitting by him.
I never visited Mr and hies. Evans. They called on me °see
lame time after they were married. 1 was ill at the time,
aid eonld not see them. _ _
_ _ _

Es.examined—Defendant is a hale, active man. I don't
know how many carriage* he has.
Mrs. Taylor, ermined by Mr. Asplaud—l am • widow,
residing in Leicester, and let furnished apartments. I re-
member the plaintiff and his wife coming* to my house.
Thelma, in November, and stayed until the resins nos-
meson, in March, 113fil. Mr. Evans brought a carriage
with him. He hinted three days a week, bud occasionally
stopped at home to take Mr.. Evans out to walk. Oa one
occasion she refused to go oat. When he went out hunting
he always returned to dinner. They visited, whilst there,
with Captain lams and his wife, and Mrs. Bingley. When
Mr. Evans returned to dinner he never left his wife lions.
Then were no furnished houses to let at that time. My
apartments were as good as any is Leireater. During their
stay there was *dispute about the maid. She mithenducted
herself ; and when Mr. Evans retuned from Cheltenham'
he dim:nand Mrs. Evans's maid, and she called him a fool
for so doing. The plaintiff's conduct was always very kind
to hie wife.
Crou-ezamined by Mr. Atherton—Mr. Evans did not
malady go out to hunt five day' out of the seven. He
might go sometimes. They bad four rooms. They dined
in the drawing-ream. My servant waited upon them. I
used to go np to take the order for dinner about 9 o'clock,
before Mr. Evans went out bunting. Mrs. Evans seed to
my she did mot are what she had for dinner. She said thin
in a petulnit tone. The servant who waited en them le not
here. Mai. Evans took the part of her maid. Mr. Evans
took pert against her, and dismissed her. 1 considered Mrs.
Evan* very solid, like.
William John Chorltos, examined by the Attorney-
General—l live in Cheltenham", and am acquained with the
defendant Mr. Robinson. I know Mrs. Evans by sight.
I have frequently seen them riding together, and frequently
walking together, both before and eines the marriage. She
rode on a black hone, **property of Mr. Robinson. I
never sew any groom with then. 1 never taw Mn. Evans
riding with anybody else ; nor Mr. Robinon. I have sae
them three or four days a weak in thee slather.
Alfred Cooks, examined by Mr. arrant Wilkins—l
am a footman in the service of Mr. Carrington, Lens-
down-terraos, Cheltenham. I have been there two
years. Mrs. Evens lives there. Mr. Robinson visite
there meet days when in town ; sometimes twin
a day. Mrs. Brans rods out and walked out
with Kr. Robinson. She rode Mr. Robinson's horse. They
have generally gone out unattended. Mr. Robinson gene-
rally came between two end throe o'clock. Sometimes the
other members of the family were oat, and then Mr. Robin-
son and Mrs. Evans used to be together in the drawing-
room ; sometimes for an hour, sometimes more, sornatimen
lam.
son drank tea there. I left Mr. Carriegton's service on
Crew esAmdsed by Mr. Watson—Sometimes Mr. Robin-
the subpoena I lett his service. I saw Mr. Field about twelve
anTeenhothererenothuFernstiounbeegnlaanfoy:
months before that. I mat him bytedden' is Lansdowne
Friday last. I gave him so notice. As sees as! remind
ton's ; ha owes me two months' wages. I ban sot been pro-
mised my wager. I expect to ban .my wages paid whilst I
me here. If I win I expect my wages will be paid me. I
terrace. I did net get my wages re I left Mr. Caning-
seem Mr. Evans, Inn have sot spoken to him.
Re-examined—l told Mrs. Carriegten I was stibpossasiL
any employment from Mr. Field. I have
When the defendant came in the evening to tel there wa
alone wits
pectation of reward bold out tome.
hoe. '
alas Mayer, ezusimed by Mr. Aspland—l have a *op
the house. He was
fa the Promenade Cheltenham. 1 know the defendant
and Ma. Evans. I have • piece of lead at Swindon. Igo •
there frequently. I have seen the defendant eta
Erns coming out there on horseback. I have Men them
tries in one week. They were riding mere alien U.
kis sweetheart than a man and his wife. ; •
Croneamenned by Mr. AtherPeople hive Anne
there sometime,. la fine westherto It e a very linty Sew Fie •
for • ride. They don't save turnpike by wag that way.c...
It is called the Cheapelde. The turnpike Ann IMmit 'ft-
mond. I know Mr. Evans. I never reelfeepihifibre
from him in my life. . _
Captain Riehard Litchfield, examined Sit Afillelne'
Osnaral—l lire in Lansdowne-tenets, I eat'
ectlaeiatsd with the Ca:Antos Wally, sad dor

•

I

feudist. I knew the lady returned to her father'
wslklsg
. house.
She mad Mr. Bo
ris' were freqsently tcputer,
eg an/ doom is Ina- of oar loam. Their meaner did sot
strike me I. being remarkable. I saw them together tees
es Mies a week for a emoiderable tome. I
elia, with say age elm inept her owe family
Jobs Gotta, esammed by Mr. Serpent Wilkise—l sew
bald a situation at the Boma of °releases. I :Mimi from
the Flies of Leeks is 11* Ia 1863 I yes employed by
Mr Thleelta, eplalletee. to welsh Kn. Erase. I welshed
Me. lb. Edgewaro-rned, is Louden, is the mouth of Jess.
I Whew Mr. Robtasem. I bare wee him go titer* three or
lest Mime slay is the foreseen, sad Swim is tbe afteratom
0a ese semsies I ea* him 'meek, but afterwards I ma% soy
whether heist kimielf es sot. I taw the defes.daut after
warts oyeesies ea the Int lose. derlii tee hourhat room
ham Me stmt. la attest aquof se miter he
west is imiappearail at the window with the plaistirs lady.
After that film Mad was pulled down by the Sefesslaut
This oseesseit ease a day. I rill esatisaed to watch the
lases. The Wad wee generally draws lip is about twenty
salaam I saw them walk sad dries oat every day, es.
sept es one thiselay, ibis I did sot attend. Thu wee
from the ISth nf Jas. to the of Juy. Whoa they
walked out I Mowed them. I Bth
Itfollowed em at the grist
day to the Natiosal Gallery. I followed them ose everting
at kite se half-pest Wee e'elook. I taw them walk arm-
is•arst, sad Kr. Bahamas mated to be settee lee to the

1"Irmo.o aintimed---I was Afton years is the polies. Ire
tired fa Fetintary.lB3.l I lin is No $B, meet, Now
Cat, Lambeth. Mr. Deana, Me entente' employed me. 1
was *ipleyeil par work. I received 11. 4s. par week, sad
/111 .:pews. lay 1112111120111 ware SOCOOtiOICO 41., sometimes
nom. I repeated to Mr. Dena* every analog. The bbad
was draws down sommiaws is the Lemma, sometimos is
the shampoo.
Ro-easmiaod—Whoa I Mired I lift with half-pay and a
int Mem entilleate.
Km Sarah Paillip% mania* by Mt. Molest —I am'
the win et H. l Phillips. of No. 13, Rdgeware-road. Is
rune,lB63, Kra Imaseeespiod room is my *ma Mr.
Robins°. took tie speramaii, conisting of two drawn,
moss sad two bedeasss. The naming after Mrs.
IliTosie UAW Mr. Relimma inked for • latch key, and
I gave his ow. IM timbal( M with this
kg. Mn. Ryan asanned • fortnight and •
day. Tao dehataat was *en two or three *tea every
day. Zs asegpsd a sheet fine is Me fonnoen and imager
fu min They assay via* out to Oa that in
the swami. No ewe also est* ea are. Brass. Mr.
Robiasea told as eirma Mr. Brews Isis fist ha had Mos*
I* key es the hallnitha mat I shoo lowed ft. Tine was
• sera is she nem. The *aim Is ems is the I iter,
the those la intiedlatiy Am*, shop. I oat my that •
sad
roma ma Si. sera ma bonen ham the street ; but yea ma
am Mem* the nem.
Criereamalaod by Mr. Atherton—l had • insist at
tbis tine. There was a csaid ia attendance on Dirs. Brans ;
her name wee Clue. She was sot in thee habit of assweriag
the door. My busts* always mad. the doors fast at sight. I
about twain esiailt.
Re essialasi—Tbe awn* .at up for her mistress at
Realty J. examlood by Kr. &gnat Wilkins—l
an the hobo* of the last Lunen. lam a tailor. I kaow
Dlr. Rehissam I rennet* Mn. Bun lodging at ay
i 5,... Kr. Robin* called frequently, and I saw no one
Ist Mm is.
Janina Killer, anemia* by Ms Attorney-Oeural—She
was awn* to the two make* witnesses, and corroborated
tit* isithmosy. Ti. deteadeatt manner was always very
free to Mn. Inas. lie on moo occasion wont up and
kaseked at K,.. &east *drama door.
bitspernm Chaise Predation Paid, waited by Mr.
FyearWilkiato.4 wee late as impactor is the metro-
s'astostive polies Inn, and rebind with a pianos he
sonic* la haaary, Ink I was employed by
Mr. Hamm to watch the minima of Ws wits. Oa the 17tk
Jimmy, 1654, I weal so Cheltenham far that purpose. Oa
the 19th I was watching Mr. Caren/coat home. I saw
Kr. Robison then about halt-past 10 o'clock. He west is
sad reassiast half an hour. Before that I bad men Mrs
and Kim Caniegtoa go oat. Ho came about • Touter of
sa hear Maw tbey went oat. SOMII time atm% *oat two
hima, I net Kr. Robbins sad Mrs Even
*gib" ea hemiebsek. Tbey bad ao areenri.dal
nallebei Mr. Carrington's beam up to Knelt 9th,
Ass lho Mk of January. I we* thole *eat
Su etleek is the corning, and watched uatil two Oink.
I Ilicnialleei he half as hoar, and rammed sad watched
agli Ma Vista. Kr. Robin= call.d every day. I saw
*am Oft then thaw sad walk a dose° of than Oa the ter-
* Oa the 211th of January, stout 10 o'clock I saw Mr.
Clarliest* loam tho beam I thee saw Mr. Reins*
0011$ Ile OS beresbeek. Tke servant gene out sad hold the
Mac He mat Mn. sal Kim Caviares moisi eat el
Si. house. He weal is end Mopped about tea ado**
la tin ahem* I saw him *sat three, I saw Km Car.
Magna, Kn. En* sad emstehar lady wailing op sad
dews tbo tames. Kr. Bablassajaimal Monae walked
it &Mat 6 Lout* Sow Kaaßemsa leanithe mg, sad go
Me the hone. la aMt Waste ohs sane GM end joie*
the pug. Whim she sans eat lialinsea slippai bask, sad
aka tibia's,* to him. After *Wag a feew yamb bask,
loft
bin again, aad went to tbs bows. She nippri la ihe
house about two minutes, mate out, sad, stitailig ea her
tip tom, book** to hiss. Ho wort up to bare mai wet
Sate Ms beam He west immediately. nay sapped
twat/ minutes is tho bone. Ms blinds of the
Int Saw wiadows were dews. Tb. other ladies cow
tirsod M walk on Moo tart.... After they mate
mob of Ohs bean tie defeats* and Mrs. Eva* west into •
that leads to Harbin. They wet to the bottom of
sad as the sad el the walk ho took kw playfully
.67711.."1/2 Wm* is, mad, sad the walked bask. I
IshUbillialem ea the 9fit of March. I es+ no non of
the ibilsairst wit Kn. Inas uatil the 21st of Jane. I
Ilan **vs' lalbenadas that Kn. Brans was in London.
I isidelisil he the disfinkat at his mother's hoes% is Com-
batant-Meat Oa the 26th or Jane, saw the Window
Inme at et hie netts?' bean about tea o'cloek. I fol.
lowed his to his ledgiags I. Goorge's-street, sad he thou
nest to No. 2, Brysasteabetrest. In about 20 Wastes I
saw bias use at with Mre. Ryan and a young gentia-
n*. Thy. meta • review°. Ms Esse. Rifles in Hyde-park.
Oa tho fold via I saw Mn. Leg, the landlady of the
Maw.l Ink *see. I grad to pat Mr 261. per
methfor the an et banes. I told her who I wu, sad
that I was ampleyed is ail* the madam of tbe lady on
the Int Ike% sad would albs moist as. She rdseet. I
know that Kra Rig's .ask arm leaving, sad 1 el 3
Mn. Oregon at two gainals pm week. On the 174
!:,..11.1.ase Kn. Orman at Kn. Ring's. I gavo her •
whisk Dr. hen or Kaaskieter-gairo bad gives
ine7, gala kat dlit•Otienli hen row it. I through
the leis la the Mac I nail see straight anon Si. room.
I km* • min maned
Crabommisd by KriVtaa.imam—l left the pollees fa 1152,
eat altanseetseenneased pieces basiness, to make
rimed fislesthaills. Whoa I Int ogre* with the plait-
tilit salter, I leithis Tay &egos were ems guinea per
day, sad 12e. Ise bold inplasse. It was tooled that, as tha
ear might tato mai Yore, I was to hays lia per day, sad
12s. foalesial setpeassa. Ie Load* the name is 7s. 6d. per
day. I sour Mat In • devastr. I toot sanct • alight
aerostat hes Kr. Rye* if we win. I sonatas get •
gratsity. I got M. sad 601 Up Oy the Met trial I
only reoeivet 601. or TOL from Ma plalauff. I watch* is a
garden is Chalteattana before ten bone. I did sot tido like
rill emu • I walked about. I was to have the see of the
whets hoaw ter 261. per mouth fon Mr.. King. I
a•••• tam Mr. Slag beton, upon lay hosear.
(Tin Cart—You are ea your oath, sir. Dist talk of
beam with • private beds* UM yours.) I made* sp-
pigment with hirs.Kiag to mast lan oaths saran arch. She
said she weld have *thing to do with the matter ; but
a* nil. «IM. is • friend of min, who is snag to take an
Omani/ al sey thing. to-mortow ; perhaps she will assist
you." MO ens Kn. Pries. I said I would be obliged to
hu if *a ambled lOC I IST, her no aselig. Mn. Oro-
iota was *Uhl., ad she was is the house about • week. I
egg* Our for the seat!. 1414 not asceptsia that Kn.
Otani was • good meek Ware I .gaged her. I had so
**oh, le en Mn. Prise noway; Thu how was fer-
al** whoa I saw the here in the door. The drawing room
was *Mad I fatly saw see soh. I saw Alfred Cook'
the erhseday at Birkffaboad. I saw him is Cbeltaabsta. I
wisnlynked his whether ha tlnd at Kr. Cannel** sad
wboothealla Robbins walk the habit of Mang *a hong I
eat bo said yes. I mad is pumas tato bad bum memialls
to Kn. Iva*
80-•zaadasi br SedisatWilkist—l Ism seen Me neat
iiinr pashas*. Thetis= bothlally reprises% tho demo of
the tensing nom This bele labored conootly. The sofa
ma be sesatkiwaghlhe bole bared t Use door.
Ikea Oman was then ailed—She said site was the wife
al • batman is Highitirost, St John's-wood. Shah* b
M1N1614 abst clefs pan, pennon to which Me had been
*nit la the madly for Gook. Oa Thursday, Os 29th
use. *a *at as Kn. King's, Bryaasten-strest Kr.
Phil sameged bar at 21. pot WMI. 012 that day Mr. Robin-
ma ems m Mrs. She saw him there every day
anima the tins she wee then, whish was *tit the 6th or
7* it the hillealag ninth. Oath. first day she west More
the &hada* 'lasi with Kr. Melia, and Mn Bonn. He
MIN that sight es* alter 11 Via*. On Sunday she saw
/kW H. gams bar a &alit sad issue** her t asks a
hale is Me holding dem I. the drawing-roma. ft* sada
two him Oa nesday, the 4th July, the elands.% gala
MOM Kn. Is.. sad leek lwa* with her sad -Mr.
)bolds. Arne Mash Mr. Wigs twat out, bat the dorm-
ant remshied. Rio watt go fan*, back trawiag-noton,
in
libido Kr. IlaNnispt, ad Semi Kn. Pries *Mg as la-
la-
*Way or Kt Igoe. She Inked th=ames
him she hal made. sad saw liebseew
oho Km Rim by Me he. Mee leld lite.Tritee to
leek swig digs that lady sale a mina itesamitaspeo
of wit* Mo. Wawa ISM oat lase the P. mhan they
were, lad abed lbs. Pries what she wee Oki Ilmwe.
Prim replisd *et she was lakieg s lavosway it Kn.
hag's Woo. Übe sad Kra Pries dna west dews. Wain
she heart Ms. Is. go bash dads the deawierpwat,
Wulassegmla WO the brit trawletssona a* look*
dig Ihe bielathe ass. sal saw • einhool look*
lam Monne go delfsala* sad Mn. Stone. Ilre.
TM" dm is NW saw the wise *inf. She wan alma
al told Mae. Wag 1. AM.
j Kra, Lug did p up. Os
die Islienteg day the eine to the house is
ass*" WI" 'i.e. Mr. Mau eggs lab the how
after bash, and the donut reteabod. elle Media
ebres lialk omisesibe 1144 is Um/ dear, sad saw die wise as oho did
vibe woo dawawahe sad lald Mea.
zzalioemrieritelar. Kim weed up hasedidety, Mate
stag dem
gag. tatiemitina what oho bagneetly Are ale she
"'Mad with atm 96.11" PM". am
nes MOO ZeTalbsiell 011 Mall•
lad get es. WOO wee seek

a nareatia about him la the neighbourhood. Mrs. Klee
re plied—. Ark panel( • puma, Mr. Rotates ; I do ii,,-
pity you ; it ts Mr. Cartington aad the family I pity."
lie said, "It you go splint me, I have got ma clever
men at week, ad I shell being a conspirer, aghast you."
Mos. King thee said she west out of the tows, out of the
eney of It, sad he said, " Caa't yea go out of the tows
ads 1" A great say other Wags were sold, but she did
Me ilemilleet oify son.
thesammblisd by Kr. Wawa Q.C.--Sbe did at say
anylidag ohm* Ibis the last esuninathe. Her
mosary boll net been elan that Um. Her hus-
band was a baths. ems was A the seafeetioaery sad
seelimery lice. An lad knows Kr. Field's deter
beau tbw time. She lesd sea Field beitste, but net to
snow him peseselle. It was at Kr. Sewell% that
Fish ism east to her. Hs asked her if she mkt
leave hems he a math. He did set esktreet to her to bin
spy. Ks mad her to ee to Wuhan s w
the medusa ref • Maly then. She west three on the 29th
She had very lielle to do is the Mabee. There was not
much mains to de. There was smear servant in the
hoes*, mood Swish Deana. She Ad at know whether
she was in Lleseposh She bed tel ems bee then to-day.
• man anted Navigates used to Mme to the house. She
sow him twist. He MEN there to elm the windows.
There was also about the how Mn. Erase servant maid.
The latter sat upstairs A her own bed-room. She was mot
aware that Mr. Melia set reading in the back drawing-
room the best pert of the day. There were two sofas in the
drawssigreem. The WNW sofa stood by the door. Mr.
Melina was seas Mabee to Kn. Evans. She listened at
the dreamt-ram door ea the (I hardily, hut heard nothiog.
She' saw Field co the Sunday at Brysnaton-street. It as
about slam or twelve o'clock in the morning. She did
tel moiled my ass being present when she saw him.
See got the gimlet hem him then. After the had looked
through ea the Tway, and Mrs. Pries had
looked through, Mn. Evaas cams out and
metered the hick
drawing-room. Mn. Price was wasting
then. She went down
stairs thee, hat remised away a very short time before she
went up agate. She went up when she heard Mrs. Evans
return iato the drawiaproola. Rho went up alone. Mrs.
Price followed her. fibs looked through the hole is the door.
She was very meek shocked, and she thought every modest
woman wools feel entomb shocked to have seen what
they saw then. Mrs. Pries was %%paean when she looked.
Mrs Price looked in a moment afterwards, and wee shocked
tee. She wee taking sot for a little imitemey, bat not in
that position. Dorriogtoo wee de/aft the dining-room
windows when she fetched Min Kin up shin.
Mrs. King calked, and ambled Iff the Attorney-Ge-
mal, said—l lived at Ne. 2, Eryoulea-strest, in
June left I was A the habit et lettiag out
apartlisats. Meg is the nese I have bane for
seta or seven years. I was pima by the pennant' is
the haven and I have let it eat fa apartments. I few
Seed la the Mom obese Mee yews. Is the month of June
lest per Kr. kohlasen teak apartments for Mn. lime.
He took the drawing reset floor and two bedrooms abeee
for Mn. Evans and the meld. He took the drawing gas
that used to be the bedroom of Mr. Melia. He said Ka
Ems would some is Monday, the 19th. On that day he
called three is four tam to kaow if everything was reedy,
..d if Mn. Swans had arrived. no arrived about An
o'elook is the afterma. He came again that day after her
arrival. I believe be took toe with her, sad he remained
three or far boon. The neat day he some spit. Bs
paseally same twice a day, ones is the afternoon, sad thee
la the ovoids', after he had dieted. He generally ems to
lade betweenOW and two. Mr. MeliaV,Mr4 IMO out
as sea as he bad talus his leach He mine hem to MUM',
and generally west out afterwards. Mr. Robinsh
ems of is main& I thigh he cut out with(
Mrs. Ems two or three times; bat he gene-
rally remised himself all the time at bate. I
had so opperteaity of observiag his manner to-
wards Mrs. Inas. I remember Mr. Field coming tome,
He am to tell me tare was something very wrong going
as between Mr. Robinson and Mrs. lima He asked me
if ; weld watch them, bat I eselined to de so. I said they
were my lodgers, sad It they passed outward respects-
bibty ia ray hem, it was teething Is do with me. Field
took some apartments in my base foe a abort time. M
cook wss Masi see at that time, and I was very mash
distressed for a 000 k, bemuse Mrs. Evans had promised that
so seek shield WOW hem Cheltenham, bat she bad not
dm ea I tell Field, and he said he would fled a gook for
me. Mrs. Onsets was introduced after that. I remember
Tuesday, the 4th of July. I went up stars, to the best
of my belief, be two and three o'clock, sad I
looked through the hole which Mn. Groan pointed eat
to me is my folding-door. I saw Mr. Robinson and
Mrs. Evans having anaezia. I saw distinctly what was
. Mrs Price and Mrs. Grand were preseat.
CV* axe cee
day I was sitting ismy dining room, whoa M.
Groom same to me, and begged of me to pup stain. I did
go, and saw the same thing repeated, bat tel meselly la
the same way. Kn. Price cease to take as inesallogy at the
Etin my hem as , Mn. Evans wished deem takes.
e, I left the hem, Derriagtes was deeming the dialog.
room windows. I east Mr. !Ablates is the 10th of August,
sad be told me to Sad out the eook sail p out of the way,
end that if I weal against him I 'build roe it. I said I
was very sorry fee him, bat I wield not kelp it.
Crew szemined by Mr. Watson—Mr. Melia was reading
for the ohareb. It was the day before I cams to Liverpool
that I met Mr. Robinson. It was on a Friday evening,
and the seannaties took plans from Portman.squsre to
Claveadishopiare. Mr. Lloyd Beans did not speak to me
about this outside just now. I was two years in this bowie,
sad I took it from as spat, Mr. Barlow. I Odin* to
mower whether Mr. King ever comes there. I have
borne the name of King for six or seven years. My real
am is Walsh. I lived Is Regente-park before I
west to Bryeastone-street, and I let lodgisgs then.
I lived then three or four years. I think I lived
L Alloopp-oserses before that. I lived a very shin
time A Brydgesarest, Covent-garden. I kept • ekes
divas there, eine to the theatre. I lived there Ise a skies
time. flied two rooms, but I had a private Muse beside.
1 live/ at the cigar divas, and bad one balsam above to
myself. I he/ two rooms on the ground Seer; they were
make meats. I very seldom attended to the &bop myself.
I slept la the home mey sibm 1 bat I ail set always sleep
Ibsen. Defers that I lived la Alieeppteseees. I never
embed oa the team Instate impetus she but there, sad
I sanied it ou there but a few maths. I carried It on is
the same of Walsh. I was at that tims 22 or 2.3 yean of
age. I sever lived is Upper Wellington-stmt. I refused
to mesa to Field's preposition. I let two of my rooms
to a Indy whom he ant to me. He took them from
me. I Ist Ohm fee 261. a month. She was • very
old lady when be mat to my buns, and she
maimed soli • low days. I told Mr. Field when
he took the rooms that the lady mild sot re-
main then very hag. I knew that the fat cook
same there to watch. She promised me that she did
not latead to snub. I a knew that she was watching ;
it west gaits oat of my memory, for 1 was very it at the
time, and I was at Oilskins anything about it. I rally
meld nut tell at what date Het the house to Mr. Field. I
let it to Mr. Cassiopeia two or three days before he some is.
On the Tuesday the cook tame she brought me upstairs (or I
might have been in the room), and I saw Mn. Price look-
leg through the door, and thee I looked. I sever told Mn.
Beau of it, bat I told all my permits sad everybody 1
kaow about it. I did not tell Mrs. Evens's servants of it.
I did net tall Mr. Cantagtoe. I promised Dr. Jones that I
would sot tell him. Dr. Jones lives at Manchester-square.
I was set ay at all. I aver thought it would end so
seriously se it has dose. I wished to have got oat of it
altogether.
Re-exansined—l told Mrs. Groeott she bad better not
have anythiag. sad she told me she would not.
By his Lordship—Mr. Robinson sever talked to as but
one about It. That was is the evening when Mn. Geesott
was with me.
Mrs. Asa Ryder, celled and exualaed by the Attorney-
thanal—My husband is now in Australia. I live et Ryder-
strut, Se James's. In February w March, 1864, Iby sod-
dent met Mrs. King at the sale-room. I was there
to Wend-
ingtmake few purchases. Before that time I sever
sees her. I remember Monday, the 3rd of J . Mrs.
King at that time said something to me about the y and
mWan ea the tint Sow. I did, at her request, go to
ake ea iamtery of her Wafture. At OSO or two o'clock
that day, I think it was at the top of the house, I resew
bet being ia the room adjoining the drawing room. The
Seek same to me; she called my attention to something,
OM
is sonse,quenes I looked through the hole in the door,
ami saw Mrs. Beau sod Mr. Robinson sitting side by side
la enanneation, with her hands plumed ea his ham. That
me ea the sofa. I made a nohe with the shaft. Mn.
Ivens ems out of the sittinkroom, and said to me, "Oh,
}as are talks an inventory,' sad west book Ani ; and
I gnat dowasPin. Shortly after that I west upstairs
arks end leeks& They were this in the act of adultery.
Cemexamiaed by Mr. Atherton—l kaow Mr. Beaus to
speak to. I have epoken to kiwi outside the court a few mi-
nutes siaes. It is three years does`
my liaised went to
Ausgabe. trp to the time of ping to Aestralia we were
separated foe some time; sot obsoletely separated, bat I
was net always with him. We had bees living separate
witida the last two years. Previous to that time we lived
tegetbse la the same hoes. for six or seven years, and I Ikea
kept the house that my brother had taken—a lodging house.
My Masai was living elsewhere. I dose% know why I
weal dews when Mn. Evens came oat of the room. Kra.
Evans said tome, "An you tads( ea lavatory I" end I
sold " Tea." I maned immediately, to the best of my
memory. las nor tette we that Mn. emote did not call
me, hat she was aysselm Mein I went up again. When I
retureed I did not pima the lavatory. Mrs. Grooott
galled me to leek thisigh She best. She mid. " Came sad
look here." I did art gut anything like what I saw
whoa I leaked thqiij,fte heis. I emelt say whether I
cap to me isielitate. I gertaialy felt sue-
I believe Os eneimeatiga that I was our-
pelted at the Mast efoos=sa.theeugb. I emu married
is St. PeuPg Ober*,
Itneasalned-117
MWOW is • waiter at the Shades,
Leedom bridge. His name is William Sasses.
Charles Jeffery aps, examined by Kr. Ailibmil spoke
as to the ameney of the plea of the room (width iris sub-
mitted to the mart) is which the alleged almtaal km-
owes Imil ahem OEM
W./ Sermes and • Mil maa woad Crualicw_he had
limit in Ihe family of Mr. uarringlee, were mad. and
evoke Is familiarities whisk they bed Mimi lenges, Ulm
C and Mn. Seas% end Mr. Miss beim the
lades
albeit Demisti a abuses doPoool to on infooSet Ab
maw whisk Met pine bigness Kim Carrisgtes and
'!the
d vide be we /riving them eat ia Mk The
wiener &melba' ea improper pontlea en width be ellameeil

siewat larned me fellow. :—I live at Olieltss
Mem bsus anseisfist with die ishadast kr Amy

Nomlowee maim
vim Ks. beams
eskad be Inge sbe