The Express.
London, England, 1864-03-08 00:00:00

LAW INTELLIGENCE.
(THIS DAY.)

COURT OF PROBATE AND DIVORCE.
(Before the Judge Ordinery.)
r. 810141 AND 1101111100.—ONTLIOUNTIL
la this cue the petitioner had obtained a dimes, and
rssioodents had since minted each other. An
appli-
.[:oo vas now made to the court to deal with certain
'elAcacias, under which the petitioner claimed an intenseh
„, ITilde mid that ea regarded the mousy which had
*o' settled by the petitioner hhneelf, the court would
tier the deed to be coantrued as if the reepoedent were
The next sum with which It Inn &Med to deal was
,nr of About LOON., which would come to the respondent
the marriage settlement of her father, Sir John
it. Lethbridge. in the event of his not emonting a
Neer of appointment to her prejudice. The court could
r„.gard this money an either in posamire or reversion,
bad therefore no war of it. Lastly, there was a
(....rther =urn of 1,000/. ian Railway Stock, repreeent.
tomes to which the respondent had become entitled
e her marriage. The parties had agreed that the
should be placed in the hands of trade= for the
first of the husband, secondly of kis wife,
lastly of their children ,• bat there wen the
simpler proviso that the deed should
absolutely
obtaining a divots*. This want hag
,
,‘„,a, the trustees had sold out the stock, and
,ter to Mrs. Brownrigg. The norm would have no '
in holding that the deed in question wen &postnuptial
Wilemeot within the meaning of the Main* but es the
had all determined this mart mai have bathing
da with it. If the trustees had done wroeg
~,re were other means of calling them to amount. The
or'.er rent therefore go in the form prayed as regarded the
rim.with coats against the 00-respondent. AA regarded
„them the court could sot interfere.

COURT OF BANKRUPTCY.
(Before Mr. Regietrar Brougham.)
IN RE FEZDLiAXD PHILIP 179C11n 0T1011111126.
o:u2krupt w+s described as of Jermyiestreet, and of
1. Firm. Oaldey, in the county of Surrey. The nee has
,:esuir been mentiooscl, oe the ocomion of two umnomear
ft: cplicatimis by the bankrupt for his relates from eue
At the last sitting, the application was refused by
y. commisaioner Molloy& with leave to the bankrupt to
I,llov t•Je application after the assignee bid ben 0b...
was the sitting for choice of argoea The bankrupt
vu siala brought up in custody, but did not renew his op-
t':catioo. The liabilities, as already slated, are about
. of which upwards of 3,0001. it due to hie solicitors,
Edwards, of Southampton-buildinp and there are
liabilities on account of the Mitre and Other insurance
I.XletleL
.t proof for 1,100/. was tendered on behalf of the Rev.
• Margetses, the amount of an award roadie against the
in action of ejectment brought against him to
r DOSSOI4IOI2 of au estate.
After some discussion, the proof was &chalked.
Mr Snow, butcher, of Jernivnetreet, was appointed as.
t,-Dee. and Mr. Charles Brown manager of the estate.
:t-nest sitting was fixed for the 6th of April.
IL% Sargood, Mr. E. Reed, Mr. Lawrence, Mr. G. Lewis,
• Morgin, and Mr. Michael appeared in the case.

-712; OniCrupt returned to prison in company of the
The case obtaieed additional notoriety from bin
fro,:eLt appearance before police-courts.