The Dorset County Express and Agricultural Gazette.
Dorchester, Dorset, England, 1874-06-23 00:00:00

POOLE ELECTION.

ANOTHER PETITION FILED.

AIo!MAT
.Httl.N.G.

It is now beyond question that a petition how Imes"
filed. A telegram just received states that Sir Ivor
tsik the necessary steps on Friday; and a letter from
Mr. Arthur Guest, addressed to the Rev. M. PatcY,
confirms the statement, as also one from Mr. Ashley.
No official intimation, however, has as yet come to
hand, nor does it appear necessary until fibp days have
elapsed ; during which time Sir Ivor and his friends
hope the l'etersfield .lecisim will lie given, encourag-
ing thew hi iiniceeil with the matter. If this he really
all they are waiting for, the withdrawal of the petition
is considered certain. Meanwhile intense interest and
anxiety is manifested on both shirc

COVNTY ('or Tuts 1/AY (310anAl11.-Before Mr. T.
R. P. la..froy, judge.
Exteolors of Geom.. ranmaq V. bang Bridle. -Uri w
/11 10 11. for rent mid balmier.; of account. Plaintiff said
defendant's wife lull Mitt he would pay Li &Wit and 10&
a inonth. -I /efendant is a inarrivil man and a borough
policeman, and las.a four or five children. Plaintiff said
credit hat been given .41 ace•inut of 11-idle's proud:dog to
pay on receiving some looney that had Leen left him.
The Bailiff mid it appeared to be the wifen ifaidt owing
to bad management Judgment for plaintiff). oa
slant's own own terms.
Arnold V. Irdloran. -Claim les. Cid. Judgment for Is.
a mouth.
Ridoot v. Rvera.-Claini 1.2 - -Mr. F. Traversal/a Mr.
W. 11. Atkinson for plaintiff; an.l Mr. R. N. Howanl for
defendant. -3lr. Iliiiont, who 14 a hay dealer, of Okeford
Fitzpaine, it sarincil had kept a runnina account with
slefoulant, who reside,. at Isle. and is an alderman and
magistrate of the borough. Plaintiff contended that the
amount claimed arope from an error in entering. a ch&pes
for 1.21 paid in July, INN, having been placed to the
reedit of two accounts. On the part of defendant it Wad
maintained the second payment of r2l was in cash and
not by cheque : and also if it had wit been pail the
statute of limitations barred the claim-Plaintiff swore
positively no payment hail been made in money ; while
aefendant, "to the best of MA belief" was equally
;aye lint there were no receipts or cheques to prove the
fact, -His Honour, on the Meta, -.aye judgetnent for
plaintiff, but ordered each party to pay their own costa.
It was a mad tinhusiness.like proce ing to pay or take
maney without tendering and receiving & reeettit Hav-
ing pleaded the Aattite, Mr. 'lowan' contended the evid-
ence supported him and asked for a case, and the usual
time Was allowed.
Peiseq, and other, v. l'inol.--Mr. F. Travers f.ir
plaintiffa. Mr. it. N. Howard ferdefundant, who, he raid,
had no money; but expected to pay these debts out"
1:1,060 left him. Vice-Chancellor Bacon, however. had
ruled that defendant hal no right to the money and con-
ferred it on the chililren.-Mr. Traven said the RUM was
business and unable to pay.-Juslgnient for plaintiff.
QUI v. Parrn!l.--Claiin 13a. for drink, and money
lent. The plaintiff keeps the Shipwrights' Arma. Si,.
admitted the beer was drunk in the house.--His Honour
told her she could not claim for drink consumed on the
premima-llefendant denied owing any money at all.-
Plaintiff was non-suiteil.
vreadie (Jersey). V. ffiooi,aos (Parkatone).-Claim J:3O
for material supplied for repairs effected in yachts, of
whielt Captain Bingham Wad owner. Mr. Travers for
plaintiff; Mr. A. K. Witt for defeuslant. .&11 had
bees paid into court for material seaplied to the Island
Queen ; bat defendant disputed the halsace rt. 6.1.,
for materials to the Royal oak. A person embed fi,alf ray
:had undertaken the retnira, intl it was alleged that plain-
tiff hat supplied the necessary mateetals ; mute bag
.ordered by Captain Bingham and otheribytiailfrey, whom
plaintiff treated as Caplet* Bingham's agent For defen-
daat it was contended Godfrey had charged almost twice
the value ef the yacht for repairs, and it was denied that
there was any agency between Godfrey and Captain
viegham. It appeared that defendant could not obtain
ahe Royal Oak until the accounto of the various trades-
MHO had been settled, and that of Godfrey diacharged.
Caffrey had alien upon the Royal Oak in ronaequeuca,
Witnessio having been called, his Honour said the evidence
failed te fix the liability epee defendant, and gave judg.
anent accordingly. The defendant -lid not ask for c.ta.

- - -
I KRUPTCI
.111 r Warrrn.—ln this (-date the trustee sehed that pro.
eeedino be stayed, £44.1 having been paid Isesids s promise
to hand over the entire estate. It was, however, necessary
to obtain the consent of the rreditioni, before the roKey
...Add be areepte4 and the hanknivtev annulled. -Mr. H.
Chve, of Newhoty, appeartd for bankrupt's friends, and
r. Durrant, the trastee, in person. His Honour granted
the argication.

ARCIIIDIACONAL VISITATIOM AT ISIMDPORT.
Tie Yen. Archdeacon of Dorset held • elitist:lot et St.
Mary's Church to-day (Monday). The bells mug merry
peals during the Leonine:, and at 12 o'clock there was a
saclebnition of the holy Communion. which wee largely
;sittruele.l by the derg) awl churchwardens. Afterwara
.almst 30 clergymen answered to their names, and Arch.
-deacon Sanctuary procriedod to deliver 116 charge. In
Telatita to the Public Worship Regulation Hill, he thought
it was breught forward at • wrong Woe. There was no
doubt reform WWI needed in 'maw of ow,eburches, but
there had alresdy been so many altamilsenitis the Hill,
that it WIIIL ill.l..iirie to tell what it 'Matt NlL&tolf
401110 to. Ile thso referred to Ecelesinstical dilapidoto.).;
.aad the need of 'tees being taken for putting the subject
ew a hotter footing. Of the Synod, he remarked
thattour nieetings hail have hold, and the members ~f the
t7hurel hail had an ommrtunite of judging of its work.
This year they would have to praesail to the election of
another Synod, and is new system hail 1... p (rained, by
which more of the laity S% ,ul.l be included. Awed
upon those wesmit the duty of seein- that the elm t.t.nt
a -re made. and sank that where a clergyman refused to
the matter in hand, the laity had power to make the
themselves, lie them *telt on the question of
grleett,,n of Proctors, and Church Petronage, remarking
That the latter wits sometimes much abtoosk itial reform
was nemind, and he had every confidence in le4lVikir lb°
•piestion to our present Hume trecridary. MGM
referring to ether matters, he In.. ettention to the
work of Loy Jkowlers, remarking that Mow ApPoilited
in *atna lowish lue: given every satisfaction, ana pr9Ytd
'minable in their special work. The Meetor had told titre
that they 1001 l done good service, ant he had heard of no
single objection to them. He then referred to the gum.
thin of School /Narita, audit:tat instances how
they had worked where halied. Two notable
oramples of what could be one by the Established
dltnrch were to be found at Dorebeeier and Salisbury.
_tt the former place much self-denial had Men exercised,
the consequence WU Iltlifiriebt mime] aceptianodation
+Lad been provided, and the mum could he
7,4aiebery. It had Icen said that too ead a Mai minium,
.of our population were under School holt and Um re
...bang 12 mth ations were not, but he ou t the f., tier
mbetetiou iniairreet. At one place sr iimotioned
rjoug text. of Scripture leol been adopted
and printed by the School Board • hut, he said,
not one of thosie texts mAnowlmlged the Holy Ghost, or
inculcated the doctrine of the Trinity, and the texts had
lien abused so as to meet the views of them who IMO-
Intligated them. In conclusion, be eheee,ga that it
w.
.contemplated to hold • diocesan fastjval in support of
Foreign Missions in connection with the Church of
Krighead, and he earnestly exhorted them moment to do
all-in their power to further the licheme. Subeeomagy,
the clorgy and churchwardens dined together at the TOMB
ital. Mi. huller, of the UreyhoUnd Hotel, catering.