The Dorset County Express and Agricultural Gazette.
Dorchester, Dorset, England, 1874-04-21 00:00:00

WEYMOUTH COUNTY COURT.

HATeRIII.II.- itefore Me. T. F.. I'. balmy, Judge.
Gilt C. Maid. that., .1:3 as. hal. for beer supplied by
plaintiff, a brewer, of W)ke, ...a retinsl, to the crew of
• fishing boat, of whielt Mr. Want ails 'Os user.- Mr.
Mamie appeared for plaintiff. and Mr. Ward aas
entire ON lier of one boat, and iert owner of another on
the Chesil beach, and the beer had been Nlllll.llOl to the
crew of that of St hich lie a. Mile Owner. It i lile 1.1114.111
for the ...tier of the boat to it for the hem and not the
men. The ealitaill f the Water Lily, the loat silent bawd,
NMI Mr. Charles Ward, le of Mr. dolin Ward, the
plaintitf, lei agent Cr the plaintiff, (obi him to g.• to Mr.
(like., anti get the leer. It IA clistionary tor the es nem.
of the tents t.. pay for the beer while they are bring pre-
jawed for fishing, Ike net being repain-I, ; but alien
they are ;kiln el)' engaged in. fishing, then the men help
pay for the beer. !Defendant did not 31.14,1 e, and Pali:-
Mont was gis en for plaintiff, with -Solite time
liftiee, %as receipts! from defendant, stating
that lie was too late to ;:et to Uie Court. -The case was
not re-opened.
The Fa et ,!! Irlw.ter Claim for
CS I& for ill,lUl long sliAlll.-- Defendant tliaputed
Klee: which he said should le Is. itt. per thousand,
hateful Of :NC, thus there was ;:s. 6.1. ill dispute.—Mr.
his waa engaged for defendant-- Mr. Mark Hopson.
agent for laird I leheater, at Abletabury, sahl hoi mkt de-
fendant 10,110 of long spars at .5.1 per tl sand, mid
defendant called for them and hok them away. Had
mut him a bill, but defendant 'lid not dispute it till about
a week ago, laden he iiiet him on the Portesluon
soil WWI You chargisl isse too much for Ling maim
Mut witness bad never elll4/,:eil le,. than Tns. ier tholimild,
and lie produced Ile. book to twine it. I kilendant haat
hail Ls". lots, the
" NI by Mr. • : The deal was mails at a Ripens'.
dior in A lilsitslinr), a little Isdore tttttt uer, anal it
was for mail) money. lle could gel me 16. per thou•
wind in Ahlotsbury. Ind not agree to let iii,,, hate them
for 11, the place whence tbey were Set WWI at
airitallee ilia Het mune 4s. Pd., it an,
Wllii miii i.e —Mr. Mime sail the price agreed
cia Was ts. lti., considering that defendant hail ni feteli
them from a distance, and he calleil defendant, who is is
dealer, and admitted leaping the lumuti apart. Mr. Hop-
ant mid the price a ti.. per thousand. but as the witness
hail to sell theni again, he a oubl take IT iii. per Luton
When lie wanted them, Mr. Mopsoll .61 he tradtel any
at Abbot:diary ; let Ise st fetch them (PPM a filiseo at
a distance. Mr. llopson also wild 111111 n,ies, and took off
part of the purchase t1,1n57 localise he had tAI sell them.
—Mr. Hopson mid he ,lid not taku off the money because
alefenitaut had to aell thou, but laicaum the) were to him-
awl( unsaleable articles whieh he could not get rid of.
He had sent in the bill repeatedly, and only lately
the price been objected to. Tim Judge seemed at that to
think that there should lie some allowani•e to defendant.
that he might get a profit by selling again:_ but Mr.
Illopaini Said defendant could gulfs. per thousand for them
in Alibotsliury. -Defendant also obits-tell that the spars
ware old ; lint Mr. offered to call the man who
made them. Judgmaut tor the amount Is •it, and sa.
allowed for witnem'a coat,: 34 to be pall in a month, the
rest in a after,..

- •
Mo'•••?, r. 11.1rrard Thor. Claint7ll.--Pisintirr.
wife eige•eeed. wiLl, a baby in her arias, mu said the
claim was for rent, and for taw and lireakfatt to: seven,
Including Mr. Butt's wife And fiveehililren.—Defen.lant
commenced to mt.-examine lbw. McCoy as to the bea
be dent on. —Mrs. McCoy ; I gave you such a bed I
could give ;it wat n the thew ; bid it was clean.—The
Judge : You could not expyvt any *cry luxurious lodgings
for Nil. for two niglits—(laughtee).—lMfondant
continued dm .ply t.. crots.examine his late landlady
about various small *moo, such as Is. 114.1., on the bill,
sind as to whether Ite did not engage the room, before he
brought hit wife awl eltiliken in. He also urged that a
certain (very small) sum charged for A sitting-room was
not due, because Ile wa. invited in to sit by the tire, for
colossally to the plaintig.—The cross-examination was
very petty, and the Judge said defendant could not ex-
pect, when Ile hired II re.llll for one ponson„ to put six
ethers into it. --Juibauent for Is. being doubtful, and
defendant hail to pay the 1'04,1.
Win? 0.1 .00..1 Weiss!, l'iorpoay v. Rickard Art".
—Claim for kg 1n,.. for hire of ten saekt from April. la7:1.
--Mr. Howard appeared hr the Sack Company. Mr. Ihike
defended him AM, awl denied kn., jug in) We, elaait
arrY eACK.. The Judge: Have yott any real defence
to thin action, letwine if son don't know about Use sase,
very likel) they'll make you know.--Mr. Illike said Midi.,
not hire the sacks, nor :ate say instructions for them to
be hired. Mr. potato merchant, of Weymouth,
RAW IA April hid yeyr, he sold eight sacks of petatoesl.
Mr. Duke, an.l being under the impretsion he Wini ti Send
them in hired sacks, lie sent then, in tacks hired
of the \Vett of Englsod liaek Company, mid
delivered them at the Railway station. —Mr, /tone
maid Mr. I itilrott was coming to M es-mouth in April last,
mid he (Mr. Duke) 34..4 hint to buy mute ',utak le& Mr.
clilleott bought S tacks of potatoet, whirl, were sent to
Moreton skaton, and he was to send bade the lacks. lie
(ergot the omits foi a short time, but in May sent then,
back to 3lr. of whom In. the potatoes
were Masters, agent for the I' pony said
that on April I. he sent out Jo tacks to Mr. Chapman
for Mr. Doke -rhe Judge said no doubt Mr. Ibike was
liable, as he sant ta-k the tack. to tit. wrong person.—
Mr. Howard uttered to ...rept the money for eight mat,
instead of ten. -Mr. link.,, however, contended tins &wk.*
were not the property of the Company at all, they weed
warned with different nausea and he had them now, and
could proillice them—Mr. Cbileott said that the. Potatoes
be bought fur Mr. Duke were to he tent in Us. CMipman't
loy and the imeks to Ise returned, There wae no
authorisation te eend•the potatoes in hired tacks. 'The
th
rtingoet were tent to Moreton station, sea the sacks
to Mr. Pidgeuty—The Judge mid die
returned
objection, at there we. no contract between the
imj Duke, was • fatal one, Ad far at
this CAW Went The Coluspmny laid cause a action
tman• aud Chapman against Duke; but he
IsPiinst Clial
nded Userwente parting to settle the cane. Mr. Howard
„ht twitalf 14 the tympany, to moot the raw
halfway, let "Sir Duke iny litlf the inotiey.—Defenitritt
cvf this. - Verdict for defelislant.T Mr. D
ukethere..,,
appJ:.d for eints: but the Judea said the whole of the
trouble was canted by defendant's fault, an mauling hack
the bass to the wrymg person. If he &ow to be litigious,
he could have another action brougiit against kin,, Auld be
would probably thul himself on the wrong as, with
peen mow to pay.