The Dorset County Express and Agricultural Gazette.
Dorchester, Dorset, England, 1880-07-27 00:00:00

lAandthiehm."
leSbnndicar::"Ce'edua:frt.y'r'll COfilon:Jß9:
atIYISCDPs to the juvenile p
bre
B"beolEth'ib°46Alritliebeht::strolthhot7afrorialrodn'::4 rtitb:o
lii :301u.e. "b:ss aPe.:.'eaml:Mi.:PeEirsga‘rtalf leshal aw.,t Ghost'
k a; ipmf:wi
respective
gat. dwil!":8:41 n.aau7tht by
elle
other
i""eanht.b login-enlge variousg
sr
There
img erased, sangthe *
ff
ff
Before T. E. P. Larnot Esq., judge.
tiembioNinD.
ither. sahoonerooomrdesr
builder awl Limb r an , w ooe
an amount for certain chests of drawers m •an s
according to order. —Mr. Lacy defended.—ln the early
Mr. Ilapry
tr'i:h::l"B,7:ani.fkle'ped7n:a7e:itc:bipclo:Pealtded:"lirePinEetimveeeer. r.olitc.farra;rm.Syhadi it'etabgPdhhonsdbibe.:lAunpsfainp-waniliriessii:::
at II
nos
for
bud beams, tomemci Moe, called upon the defendant and
asked him f. r 11 emtitusto for the making of twelve (beets
seaoineninc,:e:ll•l;:oni'n:i'r.ish-'4,ltea of port of
whom
of drawer,. mintier the diut.nct underetanding that their
r or 8:
,e1:Im me:" a
ta c
latter,doinf g".temiaTht h g
.▪ te
84 obkbao:ni"rd badoe
were to Ime nu oho ef keel white deal and fitted up and
finished in e wei k nanlike manner, the charge agreed
upon eve ntlally being 18'• 111. each. He was some time
limited tone fixed up m. When the draware ITlre made
ith
he delivered
• s witnessaccount im n t bt.seai
hbdeldnbt to
the contract tt at they▪ alit wu part of
tiC
suit
tzeittni wee by ito iii,,,114 t
the
0.
of • week t derencant and told Limactoii IPleheiwe they
am: n,na:: d
ii eg;
only
r ts
et-
eaznpr
returned
ttvcsaLlasni
tie ed t
dtfft
tit ci
dfu tnh i;m.y e
raeet d
nrt
eilirew.lew,poet •
dfr
they i
sentstli tt
h'utuhprueilincdr
destination. end were 'men returned, as being very Inferior.
Upon this witness wrote Cie defendant about tt, telling
him if he did nut take hoick the goods plaintiff would amme
bite for • Gumbo. *cement due Defendant membeeqiiently
paid the timber account, deducting, how,v r. the emount
asread owe, for the drawer... togetuer with £3 :barged as
carriage. fleece the present action.—ln mower to • gees-
ton from the Pelee ma to the reason why he (the plaintiff).
being • builder and timber merchant mei net a c dein. t
maker, sboeld deal so largely in chats of drawers, witness
replied that ths y were fire charitable building in the fete
f Wight for which Mr. L iris supplied the timber, anti
tic it dr moons come in the ordin mry course of businew.—ln
the o uee of his croes-examination he denied that he
pointed to a chest of drawer" •t Mr. Sparkee's establish-
ment 'ovine they were t be made like that. He alsostated
that de( -elan', after beim' told to out it as low WI
pes-ihle, named his own mice, which IVOS agreed upon;„
Tn- ,irlow.(emtieued the witness) were "scemPlahle
mode. and not lit hi be used oven as orange boxes, the
wood in some pm' s being no thicker then that ordinarily
ciu,useattM
aamtlettrb..clrbliewth,,kulsid:iffwawl:lekerts,"l.l.oemf ra.tonlottesave..
out of
entcrhul'.rl:l3..el.:etacitohhne.,
but this woe not ell peat. When the contract was made
he (witnee.) was t i have bad acommimion for himself, but
it was just pessilole he might have deducted it off the bill
when they settled —At the .ledge's suggestion one of the
clicet• of drawers were breught into WAITS and examined
by Mr. Curtis (Uayor), who, as • competent and ex-
Periencoi valuer, was recemeted to give his opinion. This
was decidedly unfavourable, witness remarking that they
were defective b th as rigmrded Umber and workmanship,
and that he could at any time have • bemired such sent
down from London at the rata of lbs. each.—Mr. Manuel,
cabinetmaker, and Mr Hatigood, carpenter, having given
similar evideccm as to the wood and workmanship, his
Honour observed that if an inferior price was given they
c,u1.1 only .)(poet ti have for the money an inferior
article. H geve a verdict for the defendant, saying that
the set-off covered the
CLAIN UPON THE L AND S.W.R. CONPANY.—WiIIiSDI
Vine, a potato dealer, residing at PJOIO, claimed from this
company the sum .C 6 damage arising from the &dent ion
on their line of 106 baited German red potatoes, consigned
to Lim from L mien en the let Jane last—Mr. Budge
I appeared for the plai midi, and Mr. fruition behalf of the
compiny.—lt wee mtmted that Vine had ordered the
potatoes thromigh 111-mistr. Stark, Ford, and Stark, potato
merchants. Breigweter, amid that they were to be sent
from the Nine Elms station, London. Hs ought, accord-
ing to his note, hove receive I them on the find, but noth-
ing was known of the p Utast so fares plaintiff was con-
cerned, until the 8 h, when they wers discovered at the
wrong oration. Hare weedily, and that they were not
delivered to him until the 12th. by which time
potatoes had come down considerably in price, in
addionn to which they hid become much deterior-
ated by lying so imnit at tee Hamworthy station in the
covered truck, this having calumet them to sprout
out in the haze. Ile hat to sell theni at • great reduo
[ion. toe my nothin.; of the loss of time and annoyance by
calling at the Pool, static- 1 day after day to enquire after
the good., aye he 1,11141 i-reel that he lost fully the
am ount now seught to 14 recovered—Fr the defence
Me. Pruitt 'Omitted thet the plaintiff in the first
instenc i was out of C ant, the delivery note etsting that
the potatoes in question were sent from Stark, London,
te Stark, Poole; that it was the usual pract ce for all
goods (ever since the °peeing of the station at Longffeet)
lobe left till called for at the Hamworthy Station, unless
specially metal net i.y the sender; that the goods clerks
saw nothing of tie plaintiff until the Bth, when he
enquired after a truck of potatoes, not from London, but
from Brifirwater, and that when they were brought to the
L ingdeet Station plaintiff refused to take them until the
12th, without • shilling • beg compensation. After a
lengthy argument on the part of Inc legal gentlemen
engaged, his Honour gave • verdict for plaintiff for £5 and
the cats.