The Dorset County Express and Agricultural Gazette.
Dorchester, Dorset, England, 1861-02-12 00:00:00

COUNTY cOU RT.

Swain U.L. Doncenween, Tue.'s", Feb. 51h.—(Bs.
fore E. Everett, Esq., judge.) There ogre upw..rde of
60 lmita entered, hut the greater p..rtMo leas ottleci
out ~Icourt. The only eases of any interest were—
Durid Taylor r JueepA var. Cl.iin hor t:7 12e. De.
loudest adonved the debt, but stated that he was doing
work for complainant, which, when 'fumbled, would
more than Cover tbe amount claimed. Complainant,
ho:keeer, would not allow him to complete the work. be
having gone to the fartu threw times to finish the job,
hut was unable to do 110. hi. Honor decided that the
coo should he adjourned to enable the defendant to
claim hl a set-off. .

Meant Ulcer v. Thomas (bares—Claim for LI 156.
Complainant is • coach builder, and defendant had beets
is his employ, lie lent the money to defendant about
it year sina.—Deferidant sail that sometime ago he
offered to pay Mr. Lesser, bat that he wuald not moept
it—There was also another claim for 19s. 13.1. It
appears that some time ego the defendant had all his
furniture taken from him and sold, and lie had left the
town, but lii• wife and family were left behind. Whilst
he was away Mr. Lewer went to defendant's house and
told his wile that if she could get her husband to coins
beck and work fur him, he would put spine frnoture
in her house. Thia she cuomuted to do, and de-
fendant won afterwania wont to work for Mr.
Lesser. From the first wages, however, that de•
frodaut earned, his master deoucted 1i.., toy:loch he
would not agree, and he told him he would nut work for
Lim any Mager. Defend int mid he was willing to pay
both claims, but at present was unable to do to. He
mold not pay se. a week.—His Honor decided that the
first claim should he paid by two equal instalments.
and the wound by the 4th of May.
Joan Ye..r•kp v. 17o,rwe .Ifeuicall. Defendant did not
appear. Complaimuit is • butcher reaiding in this
town, and defendant is paymaster to the Medford
Militia, which WWII thus ago 014.iationeil in our bar-
racks. The amount sought for as* Lit 16s. 1.1. for
meat and other articles for the °dicers'
'meas.—Mr. Byuicuids, the registrar, said he hol received
a letter front the defeuilmit stating th•t I.e would 1.6 y
by the 15th of Feb., but Mr. Yearality ash, he ad
waived se•rral letters from defewiest, hut he iod n„t
keep his prumiles. The regiment would be disembodied
in a few days. and it was probable that he should luau'
sight of the defendant altogether.—Asnuunt to he paid
by the 15th of Feb.
AAA Nowak,/ v. Timmisa William Amelia.. —lli.
was the same complainant se is the •luiv• case, and the
defendant was amistant surgeon to the Bedford Militia.
Claim 26. 10.1., the value of • fowl and souse butter
supplied by the complainant to defendant during the
tone the militia was stationed lien,. The defendant had
often come to complaimuit's shop, and bought •rtioles,
for which he genenely paid ready money.—Atuonnt to
be pall fortheith.
Thomas Sasossiere v. Thomas William Rawlins.
—ikuoplainaut, who is • jeweller of this town, said be
sought to recover the 11010 of £5 36. the esitte of several
wee's,' of jewellery supplied to the defendant, who was
seeistant surgeon to the Redford Militia. Tim articles
were supplied during the time the regiiuent was
stationed In the town, stud co...prised 6 gold rig, a gold
pin set in diamonds with • ili6monil fir, and a. veral
arti. ha of ilemration for a freemason's apron.— Amon°
to he Mel forthwith.
Sevi rat other MIMI 14 Millar importance having bees
tried, the Court rose shortly before two chiezk.