The Stourbridge Observer, Cradley Heath, Halesowen & District Chronicle.
Stourbridge, West Midlands, England, 1875-07-31 00:00:00

HARVEST PROSPECTS IN SOUTHE:

EMBARRAS DE CHOIX.
i Or two pain-killers doctors ask whether

•• • Z
• •

11
i

'
00te

t
3
3
f

.
s
§

.. to landlords'
to, but, on a division,
Committee
eeing to Clause 15, the
d and Mr.
compewnassatleoairinfedor
e'clock the following
eaT.: virtually
Zttaty.,tha-tioa,;:vraotlteiodpeo totat,ittiitistitiheeßillPael the Evening
r,:rli kiwi_ ,- g
'eetOteittee"4 'tots Consolidation Bill was again considered in
eeveri, •
ltdiotiejl"' .Ellll- were f w d d a stage, and the House
ed at twenty rni:Urtereto three o'clock.
/4 t, e kiTilt AMENDMENT (SCOTLAND) BILL.
taoti444 „1101:S.E OF LoRDs, July 27, Lord rlie, on the
tetaii tuat the House resolve into Committee n the
theaysA-reendtnent (Scotia d) Bill expressed an opinion that
t
Jectio;,' the Bill containeduso ep o
Bill,
to which no e
to the hlnhi be taken, the neme aaure gave enormous power_o
Itelite v'' In Poeseseion to charge the estate for imPreve"
The 4
tile
el 21114 theta reaol d ' to Committee on the Bill, and
tleetr,u4ell Were di-
-.cUSiiveed and agreed to with some amend-
ZLieert te ,
..MaERCLIANT SIIIPPiNG.BIhLLah.t
alliecle,
icirrtrisferred to the Merchant a
deep interest,
to reoe!rlt,e'ted thi4 til enintry had k
Government would be willing
gIVI or
Shipping Bill,
tise abie`4,,,er their dotez:titie to withdraw the 1.., ,
Dassed,ewn
,raltattrance that sorne other measure would l"'
wonid carry out its principal object
üblißea t7)'ltlesbury said that
P the Government had
)v:k4oceeseegive tile the important Bill referred to,
vin ;
lit the eerd Possible to pass it in the Present Session
felt
e e im
,nverntnent intended to pass a short temporary Act,
vessels freotteral . Powers to the Board of Trade
Lore t ;11
rovi-
to prevent
R°M
g to sea in an unseaworthy state.
keel" %Mere tb
st be (lea,' (night that the case of unseaworthy vesselsyp
e
oes re,he,,,es With by itself, apart from any general
ng Merchant Shipping.
.7.!littecl, i,
_...l_'Rafeord ebaerved that the
.whol
which it had been
ile tee, ja- `.•"_,_l_ euence.ot the bad way in
He could not nnder-
tilltd why li,Y.ery, nnsa.tisfactory state. n question re-
13111%TiderZsLuaeovfefillieaetet ;sight
of the
ehaliveerpohroacnetesdhtedpwpiinthg
eeeitLeh related to tic:easel% eosfohuman life.
tr7etord Chancellor said thaty the temporary Act to be lonr-
Nheetilab,,, tfie Government would be found efficacious f
e,Fieverm
havin
e,n,lateasvorthy ships from going to sea.
hips
s'oletel,;(l'. oil g been advanced a stage, their Lord s
Li tele ~__ TRE MERCHANT SHIPPING BILL.Iy_ ,
.. trtt tia'ar_Qer.S. % o.e COMMONS, in answer to Dirtlonill
of the hon
11., leuleaajSderhe would answer the question
,lat:iiettt,rh-atilite4tieAeteprAenaceednereinaceetsiivto.nled. be given to the Mer:
(11 2) Bill over
telestre cilo2lrllltirsday frankly, and he hopedtogive precedence?
eiseel, Bei tW
ittbra..ei..q !mere not prepared to
the firet
cshe,,ttlee eeaki
t_ylinasoll for two fairly. Govern.
that ' It', Motive
that the tendency.. e
'?,_, eoPpott. the Bill, because howeverof
veb. reeeeere if ex-
it it Was their opinion
ket:vils it
Bropoßewde would be to aggravate linie
eli,L.
,Oidd lead fro it'oe remedy;etl.ed wan a
and the
secondly,
importantd ly,
te4lt beeel,ee
,arn its character ?end th
sion, which would
clire4arieottecle:tl-1;
of
toltztceted
haddi
Which discussion,
thew
uecauseprin.
..
,l'. evl tile Pill brou ht forward by the Government this
fiti,„,, hm 4„
~ g .
Wohnititthcie Lae opinion of the Government, was e-
-4,41 Rive the:en:lent veas a sort of temporary measure which
geta,rineeat i Means for snore rapid and direct action to the
ttedee to sea n the way of stopping Unseaworthy_sli,ipbs
'4,alici a Measure to that effect would when
its e,,''''.(l, e t4,„•eue President of the Board of Trade.
1 ired in
efroinm.
p 01,7-4011 t,—oorary measure he meant a measure lm
Al .ie,rll, Wieferh°'l! Year, first, because a measure
grbhecause,-
t,h1414—,"19, for; the House might not choose to mightahr toolvaa
oe ."tillg Ctvermanent measure : and secondly,
it would
eteee-elttoateelaittaßitpieraall? Measure for ce y
h introduction on the
thieteh° li°llltiterfttbatt;rnelZasesfshiron the
ten Perm
Ottco.t. e Now, with regard to the measure 1
con-
sliew°l the arlyluer for Derby, if he had the general
anent measure
uroe_
lie4cl have e airs of the House next session, Mr. Plimsoll
s before the
tbet 'ettlie tirel ePPortuuity of bringing
~t?.e two ~,, oolintry. He (Sir. Disraeh.ltis)
simultaneously, that
'lie priil'elapaille.reseevrere introducedorsr uthe consideratioa
views
take care
,! vi e brought before
afford and
' ee had no doubt that with the adequate
it that the House would then_ e
t, d come to a conclusion that would be to the
i.,.'e Public generallY. rn several hoo. memb
tinese of the House,
Ii 14
%aid the Sunday Closing
Bill waiinthree ffierer-etuocnre to
der
'l4 day, and though it had excited great iu
ci
,14at thia'period of the session withdraw it an
"ileXt sessiOn.

SATURDAYi JULY 31, 1875,

a Ci:e,freet(l3*
-Otagenf
" -11
*PProvtrnt',
t 0
e 1;3
aroiz.,
qt I
Cbai)ef,. flay,
rea,
43. 45-mb):eted
untir, r

1
;
1 ,
P .
1,
,--
i).!:;s4li
I .
i
i
x
.
1
*
11°
I.
;
-:

lIYIPERIAL PARLIAIVIENT.
~:,,L...
THE IRISH PEERAGE.
, ..a the'llol3B OF m Lortns July 26. Earl
to theirßeauchamp,th
teland.e
,tord st e d, - brought o'wo her Majesty's reply
r -°410111)e addressou arespecting the creation
°Lie Peers
of
...4t was as follows :—" Relying n wisdom
t } I;hatliB4oent, I do not desire that the,,poopweeerrs reserved
an ~'"e by the Act of 'Union, of creating
. lieL
„,L should stand in the way of the
considerationupebny
tlarsent of any measure that may be introduced • e Subject."
t_. .. • PRINCE EDWARD t.1,-otds.Penzance called attention t'So ISthleAlhAypc; of the Colonial
the local Govern-
kr. tUre for the compulsory purchase
Govern-
Of '2,i of Prince Edward Island' of all or any of the Estates
14 coke Bsh -proprietora in that island, and asked what
, Ps had been taken by Her Majesty's Government to Pre-
loot the lust interests of those proprietors, and whether the
(iTaloa. ant payable to them was limited to the sum
of 800,000
tart , Mentioned in the Act.
.nratiel Coaran
ti:rsrenetfueplieilis m
lthataalro,ng controversy had been
''el'•l'icler theAet refl ted to watst eperfeencdt,tyheotughhehtheodnigdhnoiytt
iter...able that the controversy should be terminated by an
t
erwation which nalght meet with a reasonable amount
to
t of
th'-elicelleei Ile did not think that the comPensa u°
0 Proprietors was limited to 800,000 dols.
Tba 1,0,..., STATUTE LAW REVISION BILL.
litatii, ~_•ii Chancellor, in moving the second
fiesetc,'!4ta' re
Revision Bill, stated that by Bills of dia similarte
th.... 14,011
pe:Tv already passed, there had been repealed no less
r i .",1)00 statutes, and more than 2,000 we re partiv r
ca„;_ in addition, there has been prepared a chrolenlologef-
etibatJ
4Tuer to the Statutes, and the Government had prepared
. maple seven. Consolidation Bills dealing with particular
eets ot the law.
Ille 1341 wiui then read a second time.
81:11114/11 .. OSECUTIONS APPEALS IN
Oa
tone e ther
„raeLiteh of Lord SCOTLABeauchamp, the Summary p -rweam(Scotland)BlLl was read a second time.
r.
osectt.
TCh"SPIR44I. An PROTECTION OF PROPERTY BILL.
Laboetihrgl Cbascellor moved the second read.lngof of the two
Pro.
Deny Lars-;lllnae_lY, the Conspiracy
and Protection
that fr,,,,, 4214 i)e rimployers and Workmen
BILL
He said
legwatir Lhe ear 1850 to 1867 there had been incessant
tecentiillio the sabject of masters and servants, and
s broad line
ot Wtst . deter to to d
111 t tlie.--iTevQ,etawnedentacivllle.avaend _ cerirmaiwnal
the offence not
td
tbou t bt
"a'
Ipastatedath.-e‘h prosecutions
steaeltnit dun' , e tribunal before which it was tried, _
Parliament. Ray-
on the face of the Act of Parliadm
Workmen
;ill, the ur.,,e Q ' Vions of the Employers
b-everm
i.,..,a
,i_ • 'tenor next explained the annantuf rpernoptetrhtye
.Ul, inii ‘•40,1 in the Conspiracy and Protection _
the awl enahaithtthat the Government, with a view to render
atceb
.idiaposing a penalty for intimidation or
a_edte:aninnoy
' Wouldtr'oo.4s or otherwise, more precise and
attend it in Committee.
ro..""illttln4.-Ttrieigh differed from the Governmenton..e
some
believing that in certain cases tti
.ecita -im
acy x:atispir Bill would provide no adequate
44 for the InitleY done to an employer.
'l..„l4oDorelseA,h,erd. are expressed objection to some..
the whole, it
wtt a,2 Legislation, but admitted that, on
11 great parts of the
t 411140ce on previous attempts.
Lordsehil:me4 jee(re then read a second time, and their
ItzlicH
fe tk ANT SHIPPING ACTS AMENDMENT (No 2) BILL.
Se,o"-actelot_ll°l:,,lis: COI,I3IONS, Mr. Roebuck moved that the
Wei 2) 1117 T. t the Merchant Shipping Acts Amendment
bert, witi tGII% Pirasoll's Bin) be considered on Thursday
kiderleveg wail agreed to. Immediately afterwahredswSnirnied.
raove toi Pyre tiltice that on the following
day
for giving
krthe,,..,.eave to bring in a Bill to make provision. _ wises-
viorill all'ivfers to the Board ot Trade for stopping
general
thser h., a - This statement was received with a_g„,,, in
knave, iote„.hotli sides of the House. Subsequently,
Wetdd '"rtls.P. Hervey, he said that the Bill of next
. Ilet be a 9msolidating BilL
fa mu__ '4. SAVINGS BANK BILL,
aaja tila:7,l' to Dr. Playfair' the Chancellorof the
Ereheauer
!atertm' 'lO .R.v.
e--,•,anirs 13ankBill must be withdrawn, but he
1
tette, etied hopes of being able to pass the Puhl-° Works: Loans
kill if ti°.l4olllation Bill and the Local Authorities
nt _
Nelt we -3. dltrtot lead to much discussion. At any rate
111c1 co on the paper for the present.
1ar.15, THE. POLLUTION OF RIVERS BILL.
..,_ _
11414 e'Prtaell, tn answer to Mr. Ripley, said that theeraf;
~.°4orteilitle Local Government Board would take an
BILL
ot withdrawing the Pollution of Rivers
4„, oaa also et
1 Ake4alay. ated that the Offences against the Person
°at Bill would notbe pressed this Session.
Obi rfaus
TO AGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS BILL
4c)l,lllaga en Went into Committee on the Agricultural
Clsu '44. teee,,:ea 7 4,1 8, .
Compensation which th
'tad tl'air,4,l e tb recelveleefeolrfYielinpg othyeemer
. o. the first,. second,
aiseedal; elaises, were a lonrg time under discussion.
"tn.
feleasea 12'„t.iyalitnioved by Si G Campbell, substituting t r
ta"Zeillat ellna,eB-Tuatilietthe r standhardldrofcompe
'lellieljlegatilred• SiMaijeanPrnasoedn by Mr.
Disraeli,n compensation nu
If
tol .
of o,e'oafroiz ma a •
bat hn'twentle.th shalrbald out on a
si wse b,attit
by
1.93 eto.l‘2t p
nimprovement, o.eed thatthe
insteadannual n
With cexceeding one-twentieth,
etatd_regard to the sec° d class of improvements, an
olzipe,Tett, by I.lr. Rodwelln accepted, declaring that the
'eliallt lad.oll shall b th Was
properly laid out by the
tioaa, 04 the i atter Tpart ther4ernerfonvreemeenta,aniwittraopdeduction of a proPJr-
while the tenancy endures
While i111:1!ar of tenaneacill and
In ril - -"Prcwetnent eloni.ltinyweulalefschuntehahe aouusttlead.y is
made,
th.- ,seee 8, r
eferri
ie'eoait.ensatioa ng to improvements of thewaths
"strchmotion of Mr. Disraeli,
tbfiuDortion of the sum properly t by the
lacornenintgeetefneairult laid ouldrdtebe
1;18te:111,na:::tvern "represen s the manurial
baii.ti,ka et tre,..., eh prescribes the notice to be given to
dayergesee,
niiic,,:i.vernents of the second c . lass, Mr Knatch-
it et 0
7
4 three n,.,...'"ea but7ll to extend the maximum period from 21
M Hunt, fixing
,ttolleetl Weay..n
was agreed to; and also fhlit IS
: a suggestio of r
on. Mr.
•J'Veillen
-414 with to Clause 10 was agreed to that no int
;,04 Clans. If athteenlaanndtlournd.der notice shall be valid,
~t4s of
alating to the restrictions on th
!Ate
~..
sorejtrils nits, Mr. Hunt added to the clause third
se cer-
tt 14 a..v. out an agreement with Mr. Walter made
Itikllti that there shall be deducted the value
510 e... 07 vould have been produced by the c,rion--
ekr."as
,ted bts . iSz.c., sold off the holding, &c. Aur
al the clause, as amended, but it was
Wkielatell:',;ci '144 .
4191 t c'
'ides
,„z_ 1( to,
biatieTiedo
agr, _eein
zi:,r ,essed w°
e