The Daily Times.
Liverpool, Merseyside, England, 1860-11-17 00:00:00

harbours of Remini, of Pesaro, and of Guilianova.
As soon as the projected organisation shall have
been embodied in a decree, which is expected will
be the case about the 25th or 30th instant, a
general levy of sailors will be, ordered upon
that portion of the Italian coast which has
been newly armed. The mat drawn under
this levy will require to be enrolled in their
respective quarters, and the ports of destination.
The sailors supplied by the Roman , coast will be
sent to Ancona, where an office for enrolment
and direction of the crews of She Italian fleet is
about to be organised. AnOther.establishnieftt
the same kind will be for:&d.hi. icapleA, for those
seamen who lta,V.e been reVieci In those Provinces
tately for Ming the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies.

(Stite important orders have been given to
viiious private establishments in Europe and in
America, on account of the new Italian kingdom.
They consist of orders for ships of war of varioits
kinds and. sizes, which Are all a.envettal)te between
the 15th Febritat.y and .the 15th _March next at
the latest: No doUbt some of these commissions
will be executed in Liverpool among other
,1337 .means, of these additional resources', and of
the immense quantity of natal materiel found in
tl:aplei, the Italian kingdom will possess, by the
cegiUning of next spring, a very important fleet,
kvhich, so far as regards the number and the adap-
tability of the ships for fighting purposes, will
take rank immediately after the fleets of England,
France, and Russia.

The new Italian fleet, when put upon a war
footing, will be fully manned without difficulty
.11 means of the various arrangements above
referred to. The crews are to be exercised at the
guns during the winter, on board thiee ttlgates
Which are to be set apart for this purpose.
By the Adoption of the foregoing measures it
Will readily be seen that Italy, Considering the
Magnificent line Of coast which she possesses, will,
1 hive said, find in her navy the chief element
or strength and power.

(FROM OUR SPECIAIi ARESPONDENT.)
t MILAN, NT,W. 15.
6life laterview at Warsaw is already an old
story ; and if we are to believe many of the
Italian, French, and English journals, whose
interest it is to strip the same of every import-
rtllee, declare that it was of a purely personal
Ilature, and ended in doing nothing, nevertheless
1t is still the favourite theme of many .of our
Journals, who now, for the first tithe; seem to be
persuaded that there WM inbie in tile Meeting 'of
the northern sovereigns than the public in gene-
fal hate been led to suppose. The Daily News
and Post, which are almost exclusively quoted by
uttr journals as " the organs of Lords Palmerston
and Russell," assert with such pertinacity and
flfidence iinat the interview between our
A‘ °reign Minister and Baron Schleinitz was of
such a nature as to entirely frustrate the inten-
tronq of Austria and Russia in establishing any
foi. the settlethent .if the Italian question.
ii7e *continua* mead the assertions of these
two organs of the present Cabinet, and Which is
ten*** iiiiMpeted. forth in such semi-official
rtialte, it is not to be surprised at that we should
act in the columns of the Italian press that
these journals, besides being the paid organs of
;Liege ministers, are in possession of all the'most
'taPortant secrets of, the foreign' office, and that
he Morning chronicle is the paid organ of the
tench Eitth`asy. This assertion on the part of
}he two Government journals, that the interview
IA Warsaw was a failure, strangely corresponds
With, the secret circular note which' is now
~aBserted, even by the best informed journals of
vienna, to have been addressed by Count Rech-'
berg to the representatives of Austria, the contents
Or Which seems to be surrounded with the, same
mystery as has characterised the interview
between the three sovereigns, and gives birth to
housand different conjectures. .The Presse of
Vienna, and the Osservatore Triestino,'assert
that at the conference at Warsaw, Austria was
not only guaranteed the possession of Venice, pro-
Ned she abstained from committing any aggres-
sive act against Piedmont, but the latter journal,
h 1 the most positive terns asserts, that it is in a
I)°Bition to give its readers the following, as the
,
these
of the Understanding come to between
sovereigns. The account of the Osservatore
Triestino is as follows :—We are in a position to
assert that the interview at Warsaw has realised
,
the expectations of our court. It is true that
1e union of the three sovereigns does not con-
ilitute a formal coalition, nor engage the restora-
-11 of the Holy Alliance, as some journals pre-
tend which desire to be more conservative than our
~-';(rvernment. The object, however, which the
n'Vernment of Vienna had in view, has succeeded,
nording to its anticipations, namely, a mutual
goderstanding between the Northern Powers, as
regards the tactics to be observed in the face of
approaching
events without binding themselves
) any ostensible or fermal alliance. The car-
dinal points established at Warsaw are the
following : 1. The principle of non-intervention
:11 Italy, with all its consequences, is to .be main-
tained, this being also the understanding between
Lord John Russell and Baron de Schleinitz, at
Coblentz. 2. In conformity with the principle of
4°n-intervention, Austria has pledged herself to
t° observe the same line of policy that she has
Pursued up to the present time, which is to be
Purely defensive before the threatening attitude
Piedmont. 3. If Austria should be attacked,
Of which there is no doubt, she shall be at liberty
I.° pursue whatever course she may deem most,
eXpedient for her strategical operations without
regard to any established line Of territory. 4. If
the
war should be exclusively confined to Pied-
-41,..0nt and the collective forces of Italy alone, the
Cabinets of Berlin and St. Petersburg would
regard the same as localised,' and consequently
Observe a strict neutrality. 5. 'lf, however, any
Other Power should take an active part in the
struggle, or by the simple occupation of the
4orabardian territory, ceded by the Emperor
;`.\ apoleon, mph intervention should be considered
Russia and Prussia as a casus.belli. The 'Same
Journal finishes its observations by stating that
Whatever may' be said to the contrary, the con-
ference of Warsaw will prove to be in favour of
Austria, and that she has obtained all that she
eould reasonably hope to gain by this interview.
The Italian journals laugh at the Osservatore
4riestino, and in support of their argument assert
hat the conference at Warsaw was a complete
q7aseo (failure) for Austria, in consequence of the
influence that England has with Prussia, and the
qetermination of this power to follow the present
Policy of the English Cabinet. If the Osservatore
Ziestino doubts this (add the Italian prints) we
recommend for its perusal the Daily News and
the
Morning Post, which are the acknowledged
°rgans of Lord John Russell, Lord Palmerston,
and Lord Gladstone." How well might the'.
Ilu.rnal of Trieste, adopting the same line of logic,
ont with much more reason and force, turn round
lIPon. the Italian prints and say : In support of
1:113' information relative to the interview at War-
-1!1'w, and that 'the conference was not so great a
4(0, sco foF Austria as you (the Italian prints) assert,
et me remind you of the absence from the Lord
I.'
ayor's banquet of the Ambassadors of Russia,
Austria, and Prussia, and the immense solicitude
that was evinced to bring Count P-ers*ny from
4:ariS to be present at that annual union. of the
representatives at the Court of St. James. It
cannot be denied that the absence of the repre-
sentatives of the Northern Powers is somewhat
significant, especially at the preseni moment,
Whether we attribute it to Lord John Russell's late
note to Sir James Hudson, to which the Moining
Phrase
very happily applies the famous Balaklava
Pllrase, c'est tnagnque mais c'est pas (la guerre)
4iPlomatique, or to the consequences of the late
interview at Warsaw.
the
order that your readers may fully appreciate
Ie great contradiction that there exists between
the
; most influential journals of the various parties
interested in the Italian question, I will give
'hem an extract from a late number of the Inde-
-I)eniance, which asserts in the most positive
manner
, that it was seen : an extract of a letter
written by Napoleon to the Emperor Alexander
during the interview at Warsaw_ , of which the
following is the substance. Napoleon, after
lhanking the Emperor Alexander for his courtesy
04 writing to explain the nature of the meeting
the three Sovereigns, then refers to the Italian
question, and states that in the event of Sardinia
eitg. attacked by Austria, the Emperor of the
h would consider himself bound to defend
Sardinia
defend
; but if, on the contrary, Austria should
be attacked by Sardinia, Napoleon would abstain
front taking any part in the quarrel; but with
thug
1 condition, that Austria should declare that
should
might be the result of the war, she
eould always respect the stipulations of Villa-
rtanca. The same journal continues,—it is useless
t!'r me to 'point out the importance of this condi-
°ll, which may be relied upon as a faithful
tract of the Napoleonic letter, having the same
:3111 persons of the highest authority (?) Austria
'o'llnot, and, most certainly will not accept such a
t°lldition, and which Napoleon knew at the time
e'at he framed his letter to the Emperor Alexan-
tr, but 'which was expressly introduced in order
Open ra road for the intervention of France,
iett in the event of Sardinia being the aggressor.
11,14 it is possible, continues the Independance,
hat this interference may only be confined to
.I'q° occupation of Lombardy. Your readers will
here perceive the great and important difference
„ to'biveen these two journals, both of which declare
sources. have their information from such important
o Bothcannot be right, especially as the
kieeervatore Triestino affirms, that even the
,iiTPle occupation of Lombardy would be con-
-I:ered as a casus belli. I confess that lam
more disposed to repose my faith_ in the version
4,,ell—hy the Osservatore. Triestino, than the
ICLependanee, notwithstanding the reputation
h„ enjoys for the correctness of its general
h~s.WB• The Independance also asserts, in
most positive terms, the existence of