The Stourbridge Observer, Cradley Heath, Halesowen & District Chronicle.
Stourbridge, West Midlands, England, 1873-08-02 00:00:00

Allred, and would not disturb i ngennoi which had
been entered into so long as hin brother He was
unwilling to return to England, and only did no In deference
I, the fond entreaties of his mother, thc ugh be bad
never burn a dutiful or loving 800 and had never done
rtr....rrherrne :xtrz Is'ir longOy in
fontine rheit;ct!
Core. Every Englishman knew that duly ism the guiding
star of life, and the Jury would remember Nelson's celebrated
signal, " England expects every man to do his duty " The
Jury would receive • perfect ovation If they amptltte I the de-
isodank Roger, said Mr. %mealy, hated prissos, who utver
forgot and never forgave
Inn Lord Chief /asthma Where fa yonr authority for
that t

Kenesdy : Oh, my Lord. it Is s proverb.
The Lord Chief Judie, : When did you Ilnd It I have
novo hoard of It.

Mr Kerma} said he thotteht It was notation.. The odium
theologiourn had certainly paned into • proverb.
T. Lord Chief Justice That Is quite • different thing.
Mr. Ken.ly went on to hoist that Rorer had shown he
won .10 trial of the preal., onl therefore they had gone
Met.; hlm. In pioof ot tie he cited what the defendant
.41d when asked how he came hobo married by • We.leran
minister when he said he wae not on god terms with the
what*, and went on to any that the family need to allow CO
much In the pound to the Roman Catholic Church, nod that
he did not Intend to do no in future. Mr. Kinealy went
on to refer to • pates.e 10 000 of Roger's letters, In which he
spoke slightingly of the Inch priests, with reference to their
violent Interference at election., on which

Mr. Justice Lush otwerved Do you Infer front that that
Roger bad • dhilke to alt priest.?
Mr. Kentaly : No; bus I draw that Inf.-Fence from
other passage. In ids letters, and he proceeded to read •
paseage in which Roger raid he wes glad that his brother
bad been .et to Downald• In preference to Stinyhnret
Out be cited another leW r, Inwhich R wee cbservtd that
he ,lonbud If elects had enough enowledge of the world
to make them goon golden tor youth. These passages, he
urged, ahtowel a sneering sod sarcastic Writ with reference
to the cler./c. In 0011 I f Lady Doughty's letters, rg.t, he
cawi a pamage in whiel she reprehended Roger's pr. j Idled
against Jeauit, lie cited another pasaage from a letter oh
Roger's :—" I have clever come near • tried era Whop who
has not done ate some injury, and that tithe reason I have
so little to do with them." In another letter Roger wrote,—
"Di Limerick the troops were ordered to charge the mob,
mid trite print were knock., down who were inciting them
01011 i vielently." No good Catholic would have written that.
. .

The Lard Chia, Justice observed that hie fancied that an
officer might have written it.
Mr. Ki.nealy then proceeded to comment on the evidence
of Pere Leferre that Ko_oir at the age of 17 or 18 had con-
'ed to him his affection for his cousin and his promise to
build a church if he married her. Mr. Kenealy declared that
the whole ot tide story must have been either au ha:Mimi
Or a peat mistake.
The Lord Cole( Justice observed that it must undoubtedly
have been • mistake as to date.
- - • -

Mr Reneely then went on to read • letter of Roger's in
18150 slatiog hie intention to go to India tor ten years' which
he read in order to show that it was • delualon to imagine
that he had any real devotion to hi. cattalo. (Mr. Keno.ly
also read other letters in which Roger spoke of serious
attacks of Moen', and it is in svidsnoe these were dangerous
Weeks of asthma, and that medical men told him that he
could not live in the climate of this country.) In read-
ing the letters, Mr. Kenealy observed that Roger spoke
of "fly-lashing,' and he said he 'should prove that the
defendant was. good fly ilehtr, and he sold he relied very
strongly upon this as a proof of identity, for how
could Attlmr Orton have acquired the art of By-fishing
either in Wapping or Australia 1 Again and again, Roger
wrote that he meant to go abroad for ten or twelve >ears,
and in oms letter I r Mean years, and he assigned this rea-
son for it—the property was Involve I and hardened with en.
cumberances, to that he would not have enough to live upon
in this country. Mr. Kemal, went on to notme • letter of
Roger to Gostord In Anguet, 1850, in which he wrote, "11 I
went abroad I wished to give MN. Doughty Upton to live
In." And be nr,ed that it had a +wilting resemblance to
the defendant's vev•lon of the sealed paper, in which he made
a similar mention of Upton.
- - - -

The Lord Chief Justice pointed out that this could only
have been done by will, and that the life interosta of his uncle
and father intervened ; no that it could only have had refer-
ence to future Intentions.
lir. Remedy wen on to cite Mr. Oaford's evidence, In
which he stated that Roger had then." crude idea "of giving
Upton to %flu Doughty, and that be " fancied " he could do
SO. MS. Kenealy went on to urge that Rooir--sputking,
however, of his 1t... In 1860—before his attorney had In-
structed him as to his Interest In the &stab., hal the same
idea aa the deco not had in 1858, when be gave his version
of the sealed paper, that he could nispose of Upton even
while fit, father and uncle were still alive
. _

The Lord Chief Justice oteerved that only /LI idiot could
have fancied that ha could give present yossenion of Upton
during the lives of his uncle wad father, especially as it was
let at tha time.
" -" • -• •

Mr. Hanesly said his came wax that MI client was an Idiot,
and the more absurd the Idea wee, the more ids cue was
made out. What absurdity, than, war there in the defen-
dant's version of the sealed paper, which professed to give
Upton to Min Doughty ?
The Lord Chief Justice observed that the defendant had
given two different versions olti it different times, end they
were quite contradictory. Its one he professed to deal with
Upton daring the lives of Ms uncle and father ; Is the ether
he only professed to do so alter they were deed.
. . • •

lis. Kemal said the two papers ought to be read to.
giber.
. ' "

The Lord Chief Justice : But they are inconalstect.

Mr Kenealy: My Lord, they are to be reed together u
one document wragen by a tool. And their identity with
the Ideas oi 11.-ker In 1850 It so striking that to my mind It
Is conclusive ut the one.

Soon afterward,' the Court adjourned.

On Tuesday niornmr Dr. Kenealy renamed hie address
and commenced b 1 referrisig to the correspondence and the
evidence of Onsford to allow that as early as 1849 Roger Tich-
borne had • motion that he could do what he liked with
Upton, as he spoke of keeping it for Miss D iughty, who,
with her molter, had a great fo Anna for the place—, per-
fectly absurd motion, as, until the death of Sir Edward
Doughty and Sir James Tichborne, who were than boll
living, he could have no power of dealing with the
property. 'ibis mat er, he contended, was of the
greatest poulble importance es establishing an identity of
thought and Ides between Roger Milburn' and the
defendant, which couldaonly have been In the mind of one
Individual nice. The correspoedence was also quoted
from to a considerable extent In support of the theory,
already ..peatedly enforced, that Roger had Co love Or even
liking In, LI cousin, counsel observing that such phrases an
•• I have a gre 4 fancy for her," dte., were of a very equivocal
character, and dwelling upon his p ##### tent determination to
exchange luto a cavalry regiment in hailc and remain away
for a long period. In the same seras he conauct.ted
upon a letter of Lae!), Doughty, !u which she spoke of
mending Kate lack main to a c invent and keeping her
there imtil abs was •evetiteer. In another fetter Lsoy
Doughty said, "Go when you will, the moment will be a
painted one to us all, our martin, most trying." Mentioning
Hs father, the said he had been very unwell, hut was
better &Pill, adding, "these threatening' of blood to the
head are certainly to be leered" The learned conned l laid
that was a most important reference, as the defendant
had tile same hereditary disease as his father—Ode ape-
plectic tecdency—and the attack at Cant, r oury, for which
Roger was bled, really we. to be attrionted to this cause,
and not, aa the other side represented, to asthma. With re-
gard to the coldnen of Lad) Eli ughty to &tear abmt the
mime time, Li:. Kenealy attributed it to one of two circum-
stances—the rumour of his attschment to Miss Bellew in
Ireland, or a feeling that he hut Lot behaved well to her
daughter, Kate Dortghty—ar d complained that toe Crown
had not cleared up the matter, especially as Miss Bellew
was living.
• • -- - • •

The Lord Mel Justice said It was no part of Kr. Hawldnis
duty to do BO as the nine of Miss Bellow was never men.
'toned In Itogar's letters.
- - - - - - -

lir. Remaly observed that he mentioned that young lady
in a letter to Hr. Hopkini.

The Lord Chief Justice But that la a letter of the de
fondant after he retuned to England. It was not for Mr.
likwkine toeopinieeallnoion. in hi. Deters.
Mr. Eaneely thought that the visit of the Bellows to Paris
waa some corroboration of the story about Miss Bedew.
Lord Bellew gave a strange reason for the visit, viz, that
they went to on; presente for the occasion of his marriage,
which could scarcely be said to be setl.factory. Advs. ung
to the sealed packet, he said that according to G eef ord's
account the sigature "R. C Tichborne was preceded by
"Signed," and the defendant's versten had deo the same
Word be fore the signature What spirit or demon, honked,
had whispered that word in the ear of Arthur Orton
That was a remarkable incident—one of those impossible
things w; lob could never be explain; d if the defendant w.s
Arthur Orton. Then as to Sir Edward Doughty turning
Roger out of the house at Tichb3rne in an unfeeling manner,
he said he must have done at for something, and what that
something was they did not know. Roger wrote in regard to
his Interview with itir Edward, " What I felt when I left my
uncle It Is difficult tz me to explain. I was like thunder-
struck." What strong and terrible language Sir Edward
used to cause this feeling they did not know. In reply to a
question he put, Gosford denied that Roger told him that
his uncle declared he would never let his daughter marry
the son of a bastard; might not that have been said ?

The Lord Chief Just : Your elleot
when he had an opportunity of doing so.

Mr Kenosly Bu it was with my client's Instructions that
I asked the question.

The Lord Chi.! Jutted I feel curs you would not hare
asked the question without.

Mr. Ke116.21: There mast have been some fearful lone
between the two persona.

The Lord Chl4 Justice : I do not see that there need have
been any anger on the occasion. I can easily suppose the
uncle easing no more than this " I see that an attachment
is eprirging up between you and your conain. You are first
cousins, and I object to it altogether; and I think it is
belt, r you should go away."
Mr. Kenealy said that in hie anger even a fine gentleman
might u•e coarse language and it should be recollected that
both Sir Edward

The Lord Chief Justice : I can hsrdly think Sir Edward
would use such an exprcssion to ht. own brother's son.

Mr Reneely ohaerved that auger was bnt a brie frenzy,
sad that poop!' said things Manger rhich they regretted
their Been He could not help thinking that romething more
than ordinary occurred at the interrfew, end that Sir &heard
did not address his nephew in the calm and judicial way his
lordships had suggested. lite learned counsel went on to
urge that the paper written by Roger soon after his expulsion
from Tlchborne on the occasion of his subsequent visit in
fibres, y was writtt It under the Influence of Intoxication.

The tOrd Chh f Juttice : Is there avything lu the 'envier;
which indicates that?

Mr. Kenealy : 0 dy thlr, that the language Indicates
passion, and the other wridngs of Roger fleabane do not
Indicate the presence of paulou.
The Lord Cole( Justice observed that 1.. paper written
under the lofluenee of Intoxication one would expect to
and trace. of It Is incoherence of language.

Mr. Keura •••• not sure of th.t.- It was said that the
best psris of Don Juan were writs= by Lord liyrou when
he was drunk.

The Lord Chief Justice: I ant not by any means sure of that;
but, even ii it were true, Roger Ticlabi roe •lia not Byre n.
Mr. Kauai,' urged that the whole tone of the paper, datiri
one o'clock in the morning, indicated Wirt:tendon, as it was
excited and passionate, and lee celled In all ef this view tte
written promile which Roger had given hie cousin not to
drink spirits in twain. Sir glitter I, however, gave his as-
sent to the union Cl the consuu if, niter weigh g three }erre,
they retained their affection Vol. Tiny ehortiy afterwards
Beier wrote agein &holt going abroad as he was miserable
Row wee this? What was the reason for it There mu.
have been some strong reason for It. But what It was no one
could us al. ikon came the pap, r dated Jane 2E, 1852,5.14 to
have been given by him to his cousin :—" iii marry any could
within three sears, I will build • church to the Bleseed
Virgin" And lour dux afterwarde he wrote to his friend
°Word to send him • Frey chi hot k —one of the wont novel.
Of Paul de Xock—wiib ha had lel, behind bine at llchborne.
Whets° enigma this man was! And II Roger was suchen en-
igma, whet reason wean for re j cling the cialunol the defend-
cot that he also wax an enigma/ o.t the contrary, the strange
resemblance between them in that respect tided curtly to
show their lilenUtr, for there could hardly be two matt so
unaccountably eccentric. Why all this distreee and des
pondency if he was the recognised suitor of hie cousin
The Lord Chief Justice pointed oat that Si. Edward and
Lady Doughty prohibited all correspondence between the
cousins, and hinged upon Its being understood that there
wee to ha no engagement between them.
Mr, Honesty &nerved that there seemed no meaning In
Sir Edward's allowance of their affection on much an under.
strocllng, and P. went on to quote passage. from Roger'.
bitten e alluding toe "crisia," &c., and a letter from Lady
Doughty on the 14 of Jaly, putting an end to all hope of a
union between the cousins, and Me letter next chy bitterly
observing that "she had gained her point." Shortly after-
wards Roger wrote of going abroad for ten or fifteen years
What amid be more repugnant and inoondstent?
Mr. Justice Lush observed OM, on the unt4.7, it was en-
tirely in accordance with what he bad written In January—
that if his cousin did not marry him he should go &broil Slur
10 or 16 years.

The Lord Chief Justlee : The letter of Lady Doughty bad
extinguished ell hope In We mind, end therefore he returned
to ids Ides of going abroad.
- - - - -

the con'' cc, of Itoffa—FW—appmmed --dal esoentria. drier
Roger had left Tichberna In June, 1862, It appeared that Lady
Doughty bad gone to Ryde, 1.114 is appeared that she had
taken her designer with her, probably to prevent Ray clan-
de*tine 11.1 t Leger to Tic:theme I his censtu Was left
babied : but
the Lord Chief Indio@ and Mr. Jostles Lush pointed net
thst it net not so. that Lady D -ughty had not taken her
u„oghter with her, but that her daughter had fallowed her
after &lapse cf 1011./ days. TherA was a letter to evidence to
that tft,t. [The erb.etice Is that Alta Naugle and lu r
daughter were at.lt,g at Tlchbothe it the time, mid were
there for mouths.]
Mr. Ks...ly sail that In testing Lady Radcliffe's-memory
on this point he hail asked her some gestations as to Mr.
Li liscoMbe having attended her about that time for some in-
dlspoaltlon, but it was merely to ill her recollection of the
time, and bin merindOg had been much mlautsdentoud by
SOme newspaper,.

Ile Lord t bier Justice °Waived that he wu very ghvi
filth td to hear ti,, as • very diffe ent and very painful irn.
tre•sion had beai made upon ids m•toi, sod he believed.
upo, the minds el ht. brttlirtu upou . he bench.
Mr Justice Mullur aud Mr. Justice Lush I,oh Intimated
that their Impression had been., the Lord Mel JOSUCO lug
dt s:rierd, enure') different and very painful.

Mr. Ketordy repeatAl that he heal no other intention than
too t Ludy Itsdenffe's men.ory lie procee,' ed to sugzest
that his comments upon Lasiy Doughty's loiters entitle I him
to urge that the wee not Dena or straightforward. aim there.
fir, 1.4 a reliable witness. Un-i •itlece, he observed, was
of great Importance in the case, as tar deposition was used
S. confirm Lip Ridootfe on a matter of vital Imp .rtanee to
her character—that slti and bar cousin were never alone to-
gether.
. . .

The Lord Clief Justice ant M. Ituitlce Lush poluted out
that what La,ly Radcliff, had .td We. 01.4 thy hot neser
been aloha to...ther to; of the bauudati,s of hr father's
grouuds.
. .

Kenealy repeated his suggestion that the letters
allowed that Lady Doughty was not entirely truste.rthy as
a witmas fie oet on to impzest Volt perhip• it might
have occurred to the n had (1 liwor, raisin/. under he
sense of its rej-eti,m, that he would repay hie omit, and
outwit her as oho lb.d traterated him, gut pay her off in her
OWD Oa&

The Lord Child Justice: By seduclog her daughter
Mr. Kw:may : Ye&
The Lord Cale Justice • Dehberately Rod in the spirit of
vsogesuco

_
M. /tensely : I dld not me those term.
The Lord ehlet Juettee But you Bugged that, becaum he
tbon.ht he had been 11'treated Is not being allowed to marry
hie cousin, be ree Ived to seduce hie cousin

Mr. YeLeap : My lord, I do not say that. I cannot tell
what was musing through hls mind lam commenting on
his letters, and suggest what oocurs to me upon them. I
cannot me language strong enough to characterize the
wickedness ot such on act.

The Lord Chief Justice There are decrees in wlckodnaaa,
and, siren suppoting the sot had arisen out of • ttrong
passion for his cousin, it would have been wicked ; but on
the hYltothetie you appear ho euggeet n• did it d.u-
berstely out of resenge—the character of the it would as-
sume • much derker complexion.

Mr. Kane&ly : My Lord, I did not Intend to suggest that ;
all 1 meant wag that it might here passed through his mind,
not ss a deliberate tcheme of seduction, hut as Ms aunt him
been scheming aud plotting to prevent hie union with his
cousin, he would try and outwit her by going down to Itch-
borne and getting private Interviews w ith his cousin, In order
to ascertain from liar own mouth whether his repietion was
her act or with her am at, and this might hare led to results
not mevieuily dwigned. Mr. /Conesly went on to refer to
the letters showing Roger's lotc,tl n of taking a hunting-
Tor in liamtshire in the autumn of 1852, ar.d his suut's oh-
jection to it. 01 what consequence, he said, could Roger',
realdence in the conotm he, as it was understood that his
addresw s to hit cousin were rejected I

Kenealy read a letter of Lady Doughty'., which con-
talued these :
As parents, we have a duty to perform, and meat repre-
sent to you the position In which you would place both
yourself and us by coming to live In this county ; am], before
doh., so, • we have • right to demand that you should make
known to your father the ert umstanceis that have occurred,
silt must necessarily Involve an explanation with him, were
you Rear us, as to why you have trot the liberty of comtha
herons here•ofore for if we did not receive you, It would
either be. slur on your character by leaving it open to the
world to supposi tit.it there must be • serious MIS. for your
being banished or they must kilos, the truth. You are aware
of the reports that ere quite aa current is ever, and would
It be to h tying honourably towards us to shackle the cholas
of our child l"

(It Is necessary, in order to make thin letter Intelligible, to
state thst to previous letter. Lady D nighty alluded to reports
of the cousins Lang engaged, which had prevented advances
from other.).
-

Mr. Kee.ly proceeded to comment noon the letter.
Jld R Nee. aunt doubt whether he was indeed a man of
honour, and was she anxious on that ace mut that he ahotild
not even reside in the county? " You are aware et the
report." wrote lii. aunt to Roger. Whet could that mean ?
It could not mean merely an engagement broken off. But
if 10 truth Roger had been seen on the "Lover's Seat with
his c main, then there remark. w,.util he intelhgible. And
there would be evidence on that p bit directly contratfin
tory of Lady Radcliffe If she had been seen with Aver
under circumstance. that might snag est village gmip or
sea dat. then Ids aunt might well enough dm t his cowing
into the nelghimurhoul. It would be, said Mr. Kenenty, his
painfui rufy ti contralict Lady RA:10Mo In her positive and
absolute denial of hgvieg been seen with Roger richborne in
ph•cee and under circurnatancer'e hich might suggmt sosn&L
Sir. Renee', went n to say that he would not to his client
to soy particular deka or localities on this aubject ; he had
no ilea of date&

One of the jury observed thst he hxd fixed the este him-
self (" fhe latter cod of July or A, :net, 1852
Mr. Keinely : Oh, gentlemen, you must not thluk of fixing
him to eatos or place, . he ix MIA ble to fix then,

lhe L :Id Chit Jus'ice obervesi that It must nut be under-
stood teat the C dirt aslisted this •iew. Bow Is a woman to
vindicate h.,r ho or it the men who assails it Is uut to be
fired to tia:es or Owes?
Mr. Kenesly : And now Is a man to vindicate his truthful-
ness If tie Is to be tied to them.
maw •

The Lord Calet Justice ; There are things which
c Aid never forget.

A Juror : Must we not go by the evidence Is to that?
The Lord Chief Justice; Barely.
Mr Kenealy : Oh ! yea, gentlemen ; but yon mutt go by
the whole of the evidence ; end it I give evidence to raise a
presumption its favour of his story, that will be sufficient to
answer Oda charge against him, although he cannot fasten
Is to any particular dale or place.
Mv Ju Urn Mellor (very emphatically); For cry part, I
must peoteat 111gMilei ally such notion. I protest against mere
" presumption" on inch a matter. It must be proved.
Mr. Kenetly : My Lord, I cannot call asp one who ac-
tual y aincised what Is ImputeJ.
Mr Justice 11. nor: I don't care what you cannot ; but
I protest against i(oir doctrine as to prtsumption.
- _ _

Mr liJnealy My L ri, If I sive tablet, . to raise a fair
and natl.! presuruptiou from evidence that Lid) Radcliffe
has failed to truth u t, ctr,aln parta of hr evidence It
would. I rubmit, be sufficient to (Hip*ec of her testimony
alt:uret bor.

The Lord Chief Justice : Not necessarily ao-; the Jury
relight credit a great part of It even though ehe was Insecu-
r3l as to some particulars.

M , Keno.ly Surdy if I dispose of her evidence there is
an end of this charge against the defendant. (That is, the
charge of perjury as to the seduction story.)
The Lord Chief Justice : By no means !
Mr. Justine Lush : By no means !
The Lord Chief Justice : There would still be other and
most convincing evidence.

Mr Kenosly 7 I tubmlt not.
Mr. indite Lath: It Is well you should undentand that
It Is my Impression that If Lady Radcliffe bad not been
called at all there would still have been & body of cogent
facts you would &tee to meet.

M. Kenosly said Me mind area not alive to them.
lir Jostle. Lush: There is a vaet Mass 01 evidenoe on
that head, without Lady RadclifTe's evidence.
- -

hr. Hessely said It had not occurred to his mind. At all
events, he contended that his clb-nt was not to be tined to
Intel or places. And he proceeded to read and comment
upon the letters between Rlger and his aunt as to his plan
of feting a hunting seat In Hampshire during the antunn,
which ended, however, in hi. going to Upton fur the season
—Upton being near Poole, In Doractshire,
The Court, at the nand hour, adjourned.

In the course of the day the Court took cognisance of the
appeal lately published with the name of Mir Guildford
Onelow appended to It, which atates that the defendant le
kept out of his lubmitance by. wicked and cruel persecution,
nas cruel as ever disgraced the annale of Janice." Thim
appeal had been published with this letter of Mr. °allow
appended to it :

_ _
The Tichborne trial is now a national concern. The
defendant le obvionely unable to eop 3 with the punt+ of the
Government for went pt 011341111. The sole objeoa is to enable
him to bring op the clouds of witusese• rea y to toothy to
his Identity and satisfy the pub& daft* for fair play, for
which £3,000 will be required. Will you, under these ch.-
MUMIGLOOMI, aid the came of Justice by Inserting this appeal
So the nation?

Mr. Ooslow, however, had mitten to the lord Chief Justice
in these terms :

n I was requested by Mr. Ellie, of Southampton, chairman
of a committee of gentlemen, to write to the Prew, Raking
them to insert an appeal for fonds to enable the defendant
to mike his defence. I contented to do no, upon the
auurance of a Minister of the Crown, selven in the Rouse of
Common., that there would be no o, j. Won to the publi
cation of such an appeal, provided that no Improper
language was bade use of. I unt s letter to Mr. E lie, who,
I am inforrool, camel it to be printed and forwards dto
the paper., with an appeal written by him and not by me."
And, in conclusion, Mr. (Molow wrote that, if he had unin-
tentionally been guilty of any indiscretion, he tendered to
the Court his sincere apology.

_ _-
The Attorney-Omen% in consequence of the intimation
which had been made by the Lord Chief Inetlee, now appeared
upe affidavits of publication by the Sunday Time, and
other wrs.

The Lord Chief Jostles said he had received a letter from
Mr. Onetime, which he then read, and which, he said, might
afford an excuse for Mr. Onslow, although, DO doubt, he ha I
been guilty 'fan indiscretion in permistiog his letter to be
published with an "upped ' he had not previously seen. lhat
appeal woe, inched In most Improper teems, which made it
a c intempt of Coast, tor it spoke of the prosecution as
"Cruel and dims...Vitt." Ent Mr. Onslow had declared that
he was not cognisant of Its terms, sod the Court were bound
to se tent his assurance and Lis •oology. Thrre was no pos-
sible objection to the subscriptt,n of funds for the defence.
The kttorney-General pointed out that Mr Onslo rio Ills
letter to the editors, unseemly desired them to 'meet 'this
spin-at'; but

The Lord Chief Justice said he denied cogulatnee of the
language of the appeal, and the Court were bound to believe

Mr. Justice Mellor said the lancuage of the appeal was
most disgraceful and most mirchicv.me, and cdculated to
interfere with the course of Justice.
Ihe Attorney General geld the matter was entirely for the
Court to judge of, but that under these circumstances he
certsitily should not proceed against the pubiehera of the
newspapers, for a hen they reeir•ed a document, accent-
paniei by a letter from Mr. Onslo • and the names of other
persons of position, they might fairly i Sough think Vital-
e-lees excused in publishing It. But he hoped It would be
understood that the publication of the ''appear must be
stopped.
The Court ~prented themselves to that effect, and ac-
Oordimitly on that understanding the proceeding' dropped.

On Wednesday Mr. Renner, was occupied a considerable
Urns In reeding evidence and Correspondence In reference
to the subject of the alleged seduction, to support the
hypptkiecs Dist Roger Tichborne, while he Was staying at
Upton for the hunting season of 1862, took the opportunity
of going In the neighbourhood of Tichhorne with the obi. ct
of throwing himself in the way of his comfit. Having argued
that he might have nail, done that without going near
Tichborue Park, &discussion arose no to the topography of
the place, and it appeared that Tichborne wo • parish with
a chards and • perpetual enrate, but that with the excep-
tion of the family residence, It consisted chledy of • few
small c Whether anything did happen, Mr. lEenealy
aant he wound abataia from expressing any opinion until he
had produced his evidence, but be submitted it wan per
teeny possible that Roger mt2ht have seen Miss Doughty
between the oth aud•the 14th, and also between the lath and
22,1 of Novel:her, 1852, because there nu DO record of his
movements in thoee two p- node.
A Juryman : It wee In November he dated the sealed
pocket—at least, so he said.

Mr. Honesty : That may he so. After the 12n4 of Novem-
ber 1 dou't feel myself called upon to account for his m re
meets In any way but his movements before then are mi.-
g !ctly coneldont with the story he told_

- -
The Juryman again Wladed to the date cd the sealed
packet.

M. Kenealy : Oh, there bra great deal in the sealed packet
which le not mathematical. lhere will be evidence to show
that the &COWMAN the defendant suffered cannot have failed
to have affected his head. Betides in his beet days he wee
unable to mailer the simplest elements of &mild. Look-
in at hi. ptryidcal condition, and what he has pared