The Stourbridge Observer, Cradley Heath, Halesowen & District Chronicle.
Stourbridge, West Midlands, England, 1875-11-27 00:00:00

owing to these circumstadyces, a chiiige would be made Se
,the indictment and that Thomas Wainwright w4uld be
charged with the murder, while Henry would only be
charged as au accessory.
'I he Attorney-General: I need hardly say, my lord, that
had any statement been made to the police my learned
friend would have been communicated with.
Mr. Besley : I have no doubt of ths.t.
The Lord Chief Justice: What paper did you say it was in?
Mr. Begley: The Weekly Dispatch of November 21.
The Lord Chief Justice: It is very evident that that must
not be further circulated.
In re-examination by the Attorney-General, the witness
stated that a piece of velvet was handed to him with the
hair pad. He took about two pounds weight of chloride of
lime from the hole. The shutters were closed up wheel the
search was made.
By Mr. Besley : Ile did not think that any one could see
through fissures in the shutters. When the search was made
the people were kept away by the police.
JOSEPH NEWMAN, detective of the II division of the Metro-
politan Police, se he went to 215, Whitechapel-road on the
11th September, -alter receiving a telegram from Southwark
Police-court. Ile subsequently assisted in the searches and
found a wedding ring and a keeper, which he gave to In-
spector Fox He kaw two jet buttons found, and found him-
self some teeth, bones and a portion of a scalp..
By Mr. Begley: The earrings were found in a room on the
first floor. There were fissures between the shutters.
Chief Inspector Macdonald also spoke to finding varloa
articles.

RDiTIN ALIEN, the brother-in-law of qarriet Lane said
that on the 20th September last he was at ,Waltham, at the
house of John Lane, his wife's father, whentsome jet buttons
were produced by Mrs Lane from a stay box, two of which
witness brought to London and handed overlo Mrs Taylor.
Witness also received five envelopes from Mts. Lane, which
be also gave to Mrs. Taylor.
ELLEN WILMORB was about to be examineAliw the Attorney-
General, but she was so deaf that he found it impossible to
make himself heard by the witnesii. Her examination was,
therefore, conducted by Mr. Poland, who came and took hisf,
place by her side. She repeated the evidence alreadyll
given at great length by her before the magistrates. Sher
said she was a single woman, and lived at 36, Maryland-
street, Stratford. She was a milliner and dressmaker'
by trade. She had known the Lane family very well,
and had been intimate with Harriet. She had also
known the prisoner Henry Wainwright who went by the
name of Percy King, since 1872. Harriet Lane lived with him
as Mrs. King. Witness took charge of Harriet's first child, at
the request:of Henry Wainwright, who was to pay £1 a week
for it. In December, 1873, Ilarriet Lane had a second child
and then took charge of both herself, going to live with
witness. Witneashad seen a person called Edward Frieake once
—a man who walked quick and had a slight moustache. It was
afterwards arranged that witness was to take lodgings and
to have charge of the two children. Witness accordingly
did take lodgings at Stratford. She identified the wedding
ring and keeper produCed as being like those worn by
Harriet Lane. She remembered shortly before the 11th of
September, 1874, Harriet Lane came to the house in Sydney-
square late one night excited and intoxicated, and created a
disturbance. Witness helped her to pack up her boxes, and
she went away. Harriet Lane wore at the time a grey dress,
trimmed with black lace and velvet, and black buttons.
Witness also described the way in which her hair was
dressed, and identified the pad produced as similar to the
one worn by her. Witness remembered that Harriet Lane
made a communication to her on leaving as to where she
was going.
Mr. Besley objected to this communication, being repeated,
as it was not a declaration accompanying an act, but only a
declaration of intention.
The Lord Chief Justice sustained the objection.
Witness went on to say that Mutat Lane told her to keep
the luggage until she came for it.
The Court here adjourned for luncheon. On the
re-assembling of the Court, the examination of the
witness was proceeded with.
On the Tuesday after Harriet Lane left she applied to
Wainwright for money, and received £2. She subsequently
went to Wainwright with 31. rs. Taylor, and was told by the
prisoner Henry that she had gone away, but he would
get her address. Witness then related the proceedings
at the interviews she had with Wainwright, and the letter
purporting to be signed by Frieake and coming from the
Charing-cross Hotel, and the telegram from Dover, were
put in and read. The boxes of Harriet Lane were kept by
witness until January in this year, when they were broken
open. She continued her visits to Henry Wainwright, who
told her he had heard from Harriet Lane, and that he had
seen her.more than once. Her allowance of £.5 per month
for the children was reduced, as he said he was short of
money The evidence of the witness was interrupted, in
ord,er that
Mr. Pollard, clerk to the Treasury Solicitor, might prove
having served Henry Wainwright, in Newgate, witai a notice
to produce a letter sent by Miss Wilmer° to that prisoner, but
the letter had not been produced.
Miss WiEstoßE, continuing her evidence, stated that Mrs.
King had a decayed tooth, but on which aide of the jaw it
was she could net say. She had also an extensive burn oni
the right leg, four inches below the knee. She identified thel
boots produced as those of Mrs. King. The remains she had
seen had a scar such as that on the leg of Mrs. King, and she
believed the remains were those of that person.
By Mr. Besley: She never saw Henry Wainwright, other-
wise King, until after the first child was born. She
was not quite so deaf a few mouths ago as now. She
saw the person named Frieake at Sydney-square. Be
was a man Lof light or pale complexion, with a mous-
tache rather light in colour and rather long. She never
saw Henry Wainwright at Sydney-square, but she saw
him several times at the house in Peter-street. The
buttons found were of the moat ordinary kind. She only
saw Mrs. King dress her hair during the interval be-
tween the 4th August and the 11th September, 1871.
She had expressed a wish to keep the children, and had
talked of the relieving officer ; that was the only threat that
she knew of. She could not positively say whether Henry
Wainwright told her that Mrs. King had gone to Brighton.
or whether he had sent her there, upon one of the occa-
sions she (witness) inquired after her. It was true, as
the doctors had said, that the remains were quite unre-
cognisable.
Re-examined: The telegram from Dover was given to Mrs.
Taylor, and was now destroyed she believed.
The Lord Chief Justice: What was Mrs. King's manner
towards her children; did it leave you to think she was
fond of them or not
She was very fond of them, more espeelally of the younger
one.
From the time she has disappeared to this time has any
one directly or indirectly made inquiries about those chil-
dren ?—No one, excepting the aunts.
You have have still the children with you ?—Yes, my lord.
Mrs. ELIZABETH TAYLOR, sister to Harriet Lane, corrobo
rated last witness in her evidence as to their visit to King or
Henry Wainwright after the disappearance of Mrs. King
Her sister was about twenty-four years of age, short and
thin, she had small handkand feet and a decayed tooth on
the upper right jaw. She had a scar on the right leg. She
was in the habit of wearing a wedding ring and keeper.
Witness had seen the remains, and the leg, feet, hands, and
hair were like those of her sister.
By Mr. Begley : She had noticed the length of the feet and
hands of the remains before being asked to give evidence.
'1,12e Lord Chief Justice: Had you thought beforehand as
to the particular points you would direct your attentioh to
when you saw the remains
Witness : It occurred to me to direct my attention to the
hair, hands, and feet, and I found the latter very small in
the remains. I did not look for the burn when I first saw
the remains.
GEORGE WIILIaII ROGERS was here interposed as a wit-
ness to the writing, and in answer to Mr. Poland said: I am
now in the service of Messrs. Hounsell, and was formerly
employed by Henry Wainwright. I have seen him write,
, and know his handwriting well. I also know the hand-
writing of Thomas. (The several letters introdoeed into the
case were here handed to the witness, and stated by him to
be in the handwriting of the prisoner.)
Mr. Besiey and Mr. Moody'expressed their intention of not
cross-examining with reference to the handwriting of the
prisoners.
At the request of Mr. Besley, Miss WILMORE Was re-
called.
Mr. Besley: At the inquest, were two fringed earrings
shown you 4—Witness: They were.
it.nd you said the earrings which Mrs. King wore had a
fringe round them f—They had.
And were very like those,shown to you ?—Yea.
And that the fringed part was all you remembered, and
that they were not made of gold f—Yes.
You also said that to the best of your belief those earrings
were Harriet Lane's f—l did; I said they were very much
like them.
The Lord Chief Justice: She said the fringe was all she
remembered.
The Court then again adjourned.

On Wednesday morning Lord Chief Justice Cock-
burn took his seat upon the bench at ten o'clock, and
the trial of the prisoners Henry and Thomas Wain-
wright was at once resumed.
WILLIAM TAYLOR, of 7, Clarendon Mews, Hyde Park-
square, coachman, said Mrs, Tayror was sister of Harriet
Lane, who used to visit him and write to him frequently at
his residence. He saw Harriet Lane, whom he knew as Mrs.
King, in August, 1874. Ile went out of town at that time,
and never saw her again alive. He attended at St Saviour's
dead-house with his wife during the investigation of this
case, and saw some human remains which he believed to be
those of Mrs. King. He judged so from the small hands and
feet and the colour of the hair of the remains. He also
noticed that two of the upper teeth projected a little like
those of Harriet Lane.
cross-examined: He saw the remains in company with his
wife. Before• seeing them he had been told that they were
unrecognisable so far as the features were concerned.
SOPHIA, wife of EDWARD ALLEN, living at Oldfleld-road,
Maidenhead, said Harriet Lane was her sister, and was
younger than witness. There were seven sisters with Harriet,
witness being the fifth, and Harriet the youngest. Harriet's
hands and feet were small, and her fingers long. Witness re-
membered an accident happening to Harriet when the latter
was a little girl, about ten years of age. She was sitting on a
little stool by the fire, when a hot poker fell out and burned
her right leg very much. The injury left a scar, which was
drawn very much at the side. Witness last saw the scar
when they were hom,e togetiher, about six years ago. Harriet
was well educated. She was brought up as a milliner, but at
one time had been governess in a family.
The Lord Chief Justice: Was she what is called a nursery
governess?
• Witness : Yes, my lord. She identified the photograph
fiproduced) as one of herself and her sister taken together at
a shop in Shoreditch. Her sister's hair had a golden tinge in

it.
By Mr. Besley : She might have said before the magistrate
that the scar was a little drawn ; but when she came to con-
sider she remembered that it was a good deal drawn. She
never saw the scar for six years.
There was nothing during that six years to call it to your
attention until the inquiry was instituted ?—No.
The Attorney-General: Did your sister ever speak to you
about the scan—Yes.
By the Lord Chief Justice : The scar Was about the size of
a two-shilling piece.
JOHN LANE, gas manager at the Royal Gunpowder Mills,
Waltham Abbey, said he had had Dille daughters and two
sons born to him. Harriet was the youngest daughter, and
was brought up as a milliner, and would be now 24 y ears of
age. After her apprenticeship was over she came up to
London, but used to visit witness occasionally. The last time
she came down to witness was in August, 1874. At that tune
she was living In Whitechapel somewhere, and passed by the
name of King, and had had, witness heard, elle child. Wit-
ness did not then know for certain whether or not she was
married. The last time he saw his daughter was in August,
1874. Ile never saw Mr. King." He understood that
she was missing in September, 1874, and made inquiries
about her continually, but could hear nothing of her
of a satisfactory nature. A little time after she was
missing, witness heard of the name of Frieake, and he saw a
person of that name about February last, lie went to a
gentleman of that name, at his auction room, in White-
chapel, and found Mr. Fri Sire telling. He then went in
company with Mr. Eales to Henry Wainwri4lat's shop in the
Whffechapel-road. Witness said he wished to know what
had become of his daughter, and where she was. In course
of conversation, Henry said she was all right, or right
enough. Witness asked him to let him mow where she was •
whether she was alive or dead ; and if she were dead to lei
him hnow The prisoner Henry said she had gone nwaY
wiLli Mr. Frie;-ke. Witness then said that he and Mr. Eales
had seen Mr. Frieake, the auctioneer, and he dented all
knowledge of Harriet Lane. Prisoner then said, "Oh, that
Mr. Frieake is not the man at all; it was a different man to
him, a man with no moustache, or very little."
.11w; Basler:. lie gave yen no other descriPtion ?
Witness: No. I theil said I should take other steps to
find her. The letter (produced) was one received by witness,
and signed "Frieake," and he at that interview handed it
to Wainwright, and to the best of his belief that prisoner
read it. He then said to Wainwright, "If 1 cannot find
where my daughter is it must come to au exposure ; and if
an exposure takes place it will be worse for yen than for
me." Wainwright replied, "Well, if it comes to an exposure
it must; I know it will be worse for me than for you." Wit-
ness saw the remains at St. Saviour's dead-house.
Did you recognise the remains?
Witness: I did the moment I looked through the glass; f
seemed to feel that it was my daughter. The hair was the
same colour, and the feet and hands were alike in size. Wit.

Tress believed that Harriet had a scar on her leg, but he had
not seen it for some years.
provided for
dfe thes
some
oo
nbelievedinterviewh i
weeksnk thatco nthvheaa
conversation
sit his
aamt daughtere::nte:ahhsaand bowen:acnse
roeccceuri:erde(fri
h Cross-examined by Mr. Besley Frem the time she left
be-
tween the visits of his daughter to him. When Wainwrightlwwiloatimset Witness told
als onti
om
Frieake, the auctioneer, he said, " Oh, that is not the* "
going on all the time
Wainwright hold the letter. As near as witness could guess
he read it. Before he saw the remains he had heard that the
fea arcs were unrecognisable. He and Mrs. Taylor went in
together, but they, had not agreed beforehand as to the
marks or signs they were to look for. Directly he saw the
remains, he was perfectly satisfied that they were those of his
daughter. He had not seen the scar for many years.
ERNEST GEORGE EALES said he lived at the office of the
Charity Orgauisation Society, Wandsworth, and was their
Inquiry officer. He was a friend of the Taylors, and had
known them six or sever. years. He had a conversation
with them as to the disappearance of Harriet Lane at the
beginning of this year, and instituted an inquiry at their re-
quest. While making this inquiry he took the name of
Fowler, as had he gone in his own name it might have
defeated his object, he being known to Harriet Lane.
He went to see Henry Wainwright, in Whitechapel,
and met him outside his shop door. He told Wain-
wright he wished to speak with him, and was invited
Inside. Witness then gave details of the interview.
After he saw the elder prisoner he had an interview
with Mrs. Taylor, who gave him certain letters and a
telegram, which telegram he had since lost. Following that
he went to see Mr. Frieake, to whom he showed the letters
and the telegram, and Mr. Frieake showed him his letter.
hook. He and Mr. Trieake then went to see Henry Wain-
wright. That was about a fortnight after his first visit to the
elder prisoner. They saw him. and witness said, "Mr. Wain-
wright, I have found Mr. Frieake," to which the prisoner
repled, "Oh, this is not the Mr. Frieake ; this is a mistake."
Mr. Frieake raid, "What is this, Harry?" and the prisoner
said "Oh, it is a mistake—a mistake altogether." That con-
, versation took place outside the house, opposite to No. 215.
All three than went into No. 215, to a front room up-
stairs, and Mr. Frieake said to the prisoner, "You are
getting me into a mess that I know nothing of,
and you may do me a serious injury." Wainwright replied,
"You are not the Teddy Frieake I mean. The Teddy Trieake
I mean is a billiard player. I have seen him frequently at
?arisen's, the Philharmonic, and the Nell Gwynne." Frieake
said: "Do you mean to say you have ever known another
Teddy Frieake, and not inquired who he was? I don't
believe you will find another 'Teddy Frieake, with the name
spelt the same as mine in the Lontlon Directory.' If you
know anything about this affair why don't you tell him at
once? I saw you with a fair-haired girl a short time ago..
that the one ?" Mr. Wainwright said, "No, I can produce
her in five minutes."
Did he at all describe the Teddy Frieake he referred tol?
—Yes. He said he was a young man with no whiskers, and
scarcely any moustache, not above a dozen or so, or a score
of hairs. Witness then went on to describe another visit
which he paid to Henry Wainwright at No. 216, in company
with Mr. Lane, corroborating the account given of that
Interview by the previous witness. He said that
afterwards he had handed to him the letter signed "L. King,"
In the hand-writing of Harriet Lane, to Mr Frieake, in which
she asked to be forgiven for her rude treatment of him
-and proposed that they two should meet "Harry " and to,
gether come to some satisfactory arrangement for the future. '
The letter was put in and read. Witneis last saw the elder t •
prisoner for the purpose of making inquiries in the early
part of July last. The telegram which had been handed to
witness, and which he had lost, was as follows :—" From E.
Frieake, Dover, to Miss Wilmore, 6, The Grove, Stratford.—
We are just starting off for Paris, and mean to have a font
spree." •
In cross-examination by Mr. Besley, witness denied that he
had ever threatened Henry Wainwright that he would go
and tell hicwife he had two illegitimate children. He also
denied that he told Henry Wainwright be should expect some
pay when he (the prisoner) got his money from the fire office,
or that, if he were paid, he would take care that the in-
quiries should be stopped. He had received a letter from
Henry Wainwright, which he had destroyed, but he denied
that it contained a refusal to pay him anything. It only..
related to some goods which he had purchased from Henry
Wainwright, and for which he had not yet paid.
Re-examined by the Attorney-General : The goods he
bought from Henry Wainwright were brushes and mats.
The Lord Chief Justice: Who first mentioned the name •
of Teddy Frieake to you ?
Witness: Henry Wainwright himself, on the first occasion
when I saw him. He said "I think she has gone away with
Teddy Frieake."
EDWARD WILLIAM FRIEAKE, auctioneer and public-house
valuer, of 11, Coleman Street, Cite, was next examined by
Mr. Poland. He described the receipt of a letter at the end -
of, August, 1874, from "L. King" (the letter already read),
which perfectly astonished him. Be could not tell who had
sent it, and did not know why it had been sent to him, be-
cause he knew nothing at all of the writer. Witness next
dereribed the communications made to him by Eales, and
their subsequent interview with Henry Wainwright, as
already given In the evidence of the previous witness. He
stated further that though he knew Henry Wainwright very
well, he had. never had any acquaintance withthis brother
Thomas, the younger prioner.
Cross-examined by Mr. Besley : Witness and Henry were
young fellows together at Bow years ago, but they had not
been much in each other's corapany during the last four or
five years, though they remained on perfectly friendly terms.
The court then adjourned for half an hour for luncheon.
On the reassembling of the Court, HENRY WOODWARD
clerk in the telegraph branch of the General Post-office, pro-
duced the books for last year of the Admiralty Pier, Dover,
of the Eastern District Post-office, and the Stratford Poste
office. The original telegraphic messages were sent to his
department, kept a clear month, and then sent to the mill
to be reduced to pulp. That practice was followed in October
last year.
PETER CROFTS, one of the telegraph clerks at the Dover
Post-office, said he was on duty at the Admiralty Pier tele-
graph office in October last year. Ile found an entry in his
own handwriting in the book in which the receipt of tele-
graph messages handed in was recorded.
Mr. Poland was proceeding to ask as to three messages
sent on 17th October last, when Mr. Besley objected, but
the Lord Chief Justice decided to receive the answer.
Witness, continuing, said he did receive three messages on
the day in question.
By Mr. Moody: I make the entries in my book at the close
of the day from the original messages. The telegrams were
not numbered consecutively as they came in.
Examination continued: I have three messages in my book
running in consecutive order, which' had been handed in by
a person who signed them "Frieke." One message was for
Stratford, and two for London.
ALICE PERRY, clerk at the Eastern District Post-office,
sale she held that position in the October of last year. She
produced her book, oontainiog an entry by herself-of a tele-
gram being sent on the 17th of October, 1874, to Mr. Wain-
wright, from the Dover Pier. •
PHILLIP:VINCENT said he was clerk at the telegraph-office,
Walhatregreee. He had seen Thomas Wainwright at
Fulham He had sent several telegrams from witnesstnbffice.
The last message he remembered him sending was in
December, 1874. He did not read messages; that would be
the duty of another clerk.
JOHN LITTLE, pastrycook, at Norwood, said be was for-
merly in the telegraph office at Walham-green as clerk, but
left in the November of last year. He did not know Thomas
Wainwright. It would be witness's duty to enter in the
abstract book each day the messages received for delivery in
the district. In the book (produced) there was an entry in
his handwriting, " Wainwright, from Dover Pier." That
showed that a message came' for a Wainwright in the district
from Dover Pier.
By Mr. Moody: In entering the name of the " sendee " he
would not enter initials.
EDWIN MILLS HEARN, clerk at the Stratford Post-office,
produced the abstract book for 17th October, 1874. In it
there was an entry, " Wilmore, addressee ; originator, Dover
Pier."
Susan WELLS said that hi the year 1873 she lived at St.
Peter-street, Mile-end. In the October of that year she let her
apartments to Percy King, whom she now identilled as
Henry Wainwright. That prisoner brought Mrs. King with
him to the apartments, which had been taken for them by
another person. Is left 31rs. King, said he would not re-
turn that night, and asked witness to take care of her. He '
stated that she was his sister-in-law—his brother's wife. He
occasionally came to see Mrs. King' In December, 1873, a
child was born. After this, Mr. King brought a gentleman
with him one afterDOon, and witness asked the friend
into the parlour to wait while Mr. King went
upstairs. After a time Mr. King called, "Edward, •
want you, and the friend we upstairs, and remained there
for some minutes. Edward came down again and waited in
the parlour a few minutes, when Mr. King came down, and
the two went away together. A short time afterwards Mrs.
King went out, and Mr. King and their friend brought her
home in a cab between twelve and one o'clock at night. To
the best of my belief the second prisoner, Thomas, is the
man who was brought in as Edward.
The Lord Chief Justice : Did I understand you to say that
when he was shown to you you could not identify him ?
Witness : Yea I could not; but to the best of my belief
he is the man.
Mr. Beasley: Had the man you saw got a beard or mous-
tache ?—Witness: No. I think he had not; he had a slight
moustache I think.
Cross-examined by Mr. Moody : After the person came
home in the cab, I did not see him again until he was in the
dock at the Southwark Police-oottrt.
Mrs. FOSTER, landlady of No. 3, Sydney-square, Mile-
end, deposed that Mrs. King lodged with her for some
time previous to the 11th September, 1874, at which
date she left, having received notice from witness.
Whilst Mrs. King was with her a gentleman came two
or three times, and gave the name of Frieake. She
knew that was the name by Mrs. King telling her that
a gentleman named Frieake was going to get her some
furniture for two rooms, and from the fact that when
this person came he was announced by that name totlfrs.
King- H'e came altogether two or three times, and on
one occasion he brought a bottle oi champague with
him. Front what MTS. King said same champagne
glasses were obtained from a neighbouring tavern. Wit-
ness gave details of the proceedings during that even-
ing, in contequence of which she gave notice to Mrs.
King to leave the apartments liara King seemed very
fond of her children. She Paid witness all that was.
due to her, and left on the ilth September. She had a small
paper parcel with her and a new umbrella. She could say
almost positively now that the gentleman who brought the
champagne under the name of Vriealte. was Thomas, Wain-
wright. •
By Mr. Moody: The man who passed as Frieake NM the -
only gentleman who called on Mrs. King, except Mr. Rogers.
She had not seen that person for twelve months when she
was shown Thomas Wainwright. It was in the evening when
Mrs. King stood in the doorway and invited "Frieake" to
go upstairs. She was taken to Leman•etreet, but did not at
that time know that Thomas Wainwright was in custody.
She failed to identify any one from a number of persons in
the police-station there. When she saw Thomas at the police.
court she said he was very much like Frieake, possibly it
might be him.
JAMES HUMPHREYS, landlord of the "Red Lion," Strand,
said he in 187 4 kept the "Princess Royal," immediately
opposite Mrs. Potter's, Sydney-square, Mile-end. He
then knew both the prisoners lies remembered on the
sth September, 1874, seeing the two prisoners together
at his house. lie could fix the date from his own day-
book, by an entry in reference to the lending of champagsae
glasses. The Wainwrights were in his house together
about an hour and a half or two hours during the after-
noon. A pint and a quart bottle- of champagne were
said to and taken away by them. After it was taken
away some champagne glasses were borrowed by Mrs.
Foster, and this drawing his attention to the fact that
he was short of champagne glasses, he made an entry to that
effect in his day-book. The quart bottle of champagne was
then fetched by one of the prisoners. That same night he
saw a disturbance outside Mri. Footer's, and the prisoners
were there. He was quite sure about the date, and about
the prisoners being there ; and what assisted him to fix the
date, though he remembered it quite well, was that he was
about to transfer the licence of the house at the time.
By Mr. Besley: Ile was uot a the magisterial inquiry, nor
did he offer to give evidence. Inspector Macdonald called
upon him, and he subsequently went to the Treasury with
that official, but he could not say-when.
By Mr. Moody: He read an account or the arrest of Henry
Wainwright in the papers on the following Monday morning,
but it did not occur to him that it would be necessary for
him to give any information. There was no question at that
time of Thomas Wainwright being Frieake. Before the
August of 1874 he had seen Thomas Wainwright several
times in the public-houses in the Whitec' h apel road.
ny the Lord Chiet Justice: He was quite certain that
it was on the sth September when the l g asses were
borrowed.
The Lord Chief Justice : The
landlady
tells us that on the
night of the disturbance she gave Mrs King a week's notice,
and that afterwards there were two days' grace
she left on the 11th September.
The Attorney-General put in a letter signed "T.
post-mark London, September 5, 1874, and addresse
King, stating that E. F. was coming down that re
would call with a message.
AMELIA STANLEY said she was 011 a visit to 31
during the end of Avgnst or the beginning of
1874, when a gentleman whose name was aunol
Frieake called and went upstairs. To the best of le
ledge and belief Thomas Wainwright was the man
seen at Mrs. Foster's.
JOHN BATLIS, an oilman, of Whitechapel-road,
the sale of a half-huudredweight of chloride of
Henry Wainwright, or Rogers, his foreman, he
sure which, on the 18th September, 1874.
The court then again adjourned.

added, yet

••
•
, •
•