The Dorset County Express and Agricultural Gazette.
Dorchester, Dorset, England, 1873-10-28 00:00:00

Nampsbire.

Ammar, Dtrecrivs fiemo Woctr.—At the Ford.
lngbridge oouuty oourt, before Mr. T. L P, Lefroy,
judge, the following omm, of considerable interest to
tamers mid emu dealers. were 'mud, having been
adjoursied hens a previous oourt. Th• Ara called was
a claim of 3W. made by Thonam Collar, of Vag wood,
egainst John Gouldiug, corn dealer, living near Ring.
' wood, for loss sustained on amount of • seek of wheat,
whisk plaintiff alleged wu goad to him by the dofeedeot
as seed wheat, but whlob did not mete up, end he was
obliged to sow sgals. Ur. Tumor, of Whohorm,
appeared for the defeadant. After luring the evidence
of plaintiff and his witnesses, who selthar of them was
prepared to swear that it wee not in tionseqmose of wet
wisher this wheat did not germinate, but who all
declared that the shoat sold appeared to be of eaottlient
quality, the defendant was mailed and stated that he
had only one lot of wheat whieh be purehased of Mr.
I Monett. lives au excelleat asmple, bat be did not
11,11 it se seed wheat. He offered it at 30s. per mask, the
Intim for seed wheat dialog at the Woe 32a—This neat ,
was • similar ease, the plaintiff bang Willis. White,
who sued John Goulding for £1 15a, and the third wee
brought by George White, of Verwood, who shamed
EA 2a AL In the Mat ease a jury was empanelled, and
notwithstandiag that his Honour had given in both the
previous eases Jedgmeat for the didendsat, and wanted
IVhite that the mete would be somewhat heavy if the
ease went against him, he mutated in having
It beard. He stated that be mes Mr. Gmidiog
in Ringwood market, and asked him U he had
any seed wheat to sell. Defendant replied that be had
%oomph' and one bushel, and that was all he had MN
meationieg the manes of several persons to whom be had
sold some of the acne wheat. Defendant mired 30e.
per seek for it, which ho (plaintiff) woad to. Be did
net use the wheat, defendent stating he had net a
sample with him, hot paid for It at the time, and mot
his ma two days after for It, He purchased it on the
rmoinatesidatim of Adam Revel, After It bad Ixeu
sown plaintiff's attention was coiled to some wheat
tibial had been pnrehmed of the plaintiff, and which
did not som• up 64 it ought, and he then went to see
his ewe, and found it was the same. He afterwards
saw the defendant, who said he ev-ild not help It ; be
premised to some and see the wheat, bet failed to do
so. Plaintiff sailed as wittier,' William Rtieklutd, of
the Traveller's Rest, Three-legged Cross, who stated
that he went by plaintiff's request to see the wheat.
A ridge through the geld on which some other wheat
had been sown same up well • bet in that part obi&
et; was pointed out as having be sown with the seed the
defendant supplied there w•• only • blade here and
there. In eress-szamination witoem mid the mama
was not favourable for wheat. It was very wet, and in
seise pleas the fannies wild net sow till February.
Adam Revel stated that he brought some of the deka.
dines wheat Plaintiff saw it am It was being sows,
's.4 said be should like to have some. The wheat was
• good sample, but did not some up well. Witness
sowed Wise, bet he meld sot say whisk of the sowing
emu sp. He beds pretty 1W amp. The wheat wae
sot Entity. He used seam for his own oaths& mined
with white doer. His Heaver &added that la neither
of the meow had there been say proof of spielsl wee.
tasty that Si. wheat was seed wheat, and also It was
not proved that it wee by • defect Is the wheat itself
AM it did net grow, la Si, two trot ceases Judgment
wits for the dithadaat, and In the latter the plaintiff
wee ammulted.