The Stourbridge Observer, Cradley Heath, Halesowen & District Chronicle.
Stourbridge, West Midlands, England, 1887-04-30 00:00:00

THE STOURIMMOR MMtM,

VICTORIA

[ANT r, E WAP E MTH,
9), BULL STREET, BIRMENGHAM.

WILLIAMS AND FARR'S
SHOW ROOMS

Are replete with every novelty in Plash
Silk, and Cloth Mantles and Jackets.

WILLIAMS ez FARR'S specially selected
stock Of Fur-lined Cloaks, from 25s (id.
.VILLTAMS & FARR'S matchless., Guinea
Ulster, Trimmed Plush, best value in
the trade.

WILLIAMS & FARR'S remarkable selec-
tion of Fars, Dolmanettes, Far Capes,
Muffs, Ties Boas, Bags and Fancy Fur
Ties. 150 Fur Capes, extra large size, re-
duced from 30s to 15s.
WILLIAMS & 14'ARR'S Noted Establish-
ment for the largest Stock of Children's
Mantles and Jackets in every size, from
2s 11d.
Manufacturers of the Registered Imperia:
Watert..-dof Cloaks and Mackintoshes. Every
ize,

9) PULL STREET, BIRMINGHAM

lighten the monetary obligation. This pre-
Bents the whole thing in a nutshell; and. as
the Budget is a subject which can be con-
sidered in a calmer region than i hat of party
politics, happily one may say that Mr.
Goschen puts forth a system wli•Lia will, on
the whole, if worked out w'Ci wisdom,
caution, and integrity, meet with the appro.
sal of politicians of every shade of opinion.
There may be those who consider he has
gone too far in this oi that direction of de
tail, and not far enough, perhaps, in some
other wLy ; but on the whole his method is
such, INJ think, as will prove popular. He
has had his critics this week, all the weak
spots in his scheme have been held up to the
light by those who have not had the difficul-
ties of the situation to encounter; bat taking
it for all in all, the Chancellor of the Ex-
chequer scores undeniably with his first
Budget. Men as widely apart in line of
thought as Lord Randolph Churchill, Sir
John Lubbock, and Mr. Gladstone have
animadverted rather strongly upon different
phases of Mr. Goschen's plan of striking the
nation's annual balance; yet he has had till
pleasure of seeing his way of working wit'i
an unpromising mass of material meet wit'i
the general approval of the great public.

were of the opinion that the-e was not sufficient
evi lence in he case 'or them to eonv:ct for f bony,
an I that ease we 'I ha der: j e 4, a d "se a,3 of
intimidelon woidd he gone into. Turne , the
prosecutor, was called, and sta ed that whist he was
at work in hi e shop en th- 19th inst the defendant
came to the shop anl slid lie should not work. and
went and nulled all the iron out of the shop.
Jo4eph struck at lam an I they ,11 ter°
the door off the nilezes. and to k he chain off the
chain re-wk. He had not w rked in the ship niece
as he was af-ai I. In cross-examinatiol pro-em.or
said he ()Ay worked at e siamaking in his ,ptiee
time. Ili- real oc-mpa!ion was at the gee works
He wss afraid of the threw'. All the threats they
used wer • th 4 he s'.oul.l not work. He had not
seen them near hi., whop sines. Fcaderiek Turner
son of pro-eo .to . sail tie did not hear the defend-
ants say anything. but saw them pull the chain out
Mr. Clark said he did not think he het a case to
answer as a more worthless piece of eviden,•e he had
never heard Is from the ero-ecu for. They (th •
Bench) knew t 43 difficulty he ha I had in cross-ex-
amining him Th y had no ev denee of intimide-
tion before Vein.—Mr. o na• -aid he and his
colleague were peg e,ly 4a isfi d her was intimi
dation. --Mr. 1.21rk said be ehonld prove teat thes •
were not the men w o entered the sh p, and if he
proved that fact he .honld ssk tern to dism'ss th
ease.—Thomas Att moo said he was in company.
ith t. e deft darts on the dsy in qua-turn in the
B:ue Brick publi house. Whilst in ,he public te
)i,ed th ~ugh the waidow and saw someone pull
lug the chain out of Turn •r', ehep tie went down
with defend its but they did not go near Turner'.
shop; if they had he should have s• en them, He
Could not say who was pulling the chain as there
were some hundreds present —Samuel 1 ill, Eliza
Bradbu y, Th ,mas Bradbury, and Mrs. Edmunds
gave icorroborative evidence —The 13, nch retired
to consider their ve-dict, and on returning into
Court, Mr, Thomas said the evidence was conflicting
and the Court disagreed. The summons would be
dismissed and the matt:r re-iri d on a new 0,.e.