The Stourbridge Observer, Cradley Heath, Halesowen & District Chronicle.
Stourbridge, West Midlands, England, 1880-06-26 00:00:00

SATUR

IMPERIAL PA

In the ROUSE OF LORDS, JUDE
`ll rePIY to Lord Cadog,an, that I
received to the effect that th
aeeePted the decision of her Ma
fard to disarmament as final,
Iver 11P their arms, and promisi
Lord be La Warr moved for a
rite the operation of the Highwi
~LnLord Enfield, on the part of
e nlotion, and expressed a in
would serve on the select comn
kotiou was agreed to.
b14,,,rd Kimberly, answering I
4,'"''ng the meeting of the C
,Ider the question of Confederal
to advise the Crown to sanction
lature of Natal for altering the
bYlegalizing marriage with a do
xte Earl of Leitrim moved f
Unskilled labourers employed
12th of June by landlords or
\,llOrkis undertaken by baronial
A tatriets in Ireland under the
ct, 1880. In supporting the or
jqiect was to correct certain
ade in reference to the manne:
ancllords and to sanitary antho
After sonie observations from
Earl Spencer, in reply, said t'
~,!aloaost impossible to collect
t Juld be exceedingly costly. •
refuse them, and hoped the
The Motion was then withdra
, Their Lordships adjourned
clock.

g, In the 110UsE OF COMMONS, ti
r. Bradlaugh drew together a]
tii,t,e Peers' and Strangers' Galler
n",wing. Forty-one -questions,
-94 of the replies or relating
disposed of before the first b
tban.k!n, and "Question time" I
i` four until close upon ma
,„Yetison, In order to comply
-14o,senable him te bring on his
th
Sittiday Closing of Public
of e order for the second rei
ea,ting Liquors on Sunday Bill,'
Sexton presented a petiti
,too of the £4,000,000 anni
tti; L'ue of intoxicating liquors i
- .-wuvethinent to the maintei
anailies in the workhouses.
th. Wedderhurn asked the
'°Lonies whether it was the
jlteeent dates from the Cape, the
1-I.tted to see his personal fi
altnage and could learn from
°O his o behalf, and whe
to vislYrnt CetywaYo had b .rere to the sons of Bishop Co
Sio4.

,Mr-. Grant Duff said,—ln
th
I:fastorttireunineusastteiecto;,
ralenhfanga,veeadsto say
to Cetywayo's personal frier
Lo enable me to do so; but it
visit Cetywatyllooe.
trh
clear
Secretary of State sent ot
effect that he did not consider
4
I(.!en refused to the family of
,8 Whom Cetywayo wishei
4)h finless it was distinctly u
I:al)lection to lay the corres:
lo," complete, but it is at p:
-ew that an important dispat,
tlPAirll. Tyler said, perhaps Hu
alunber of wives allowed t(
I 4r• Bradlaugh's case being a
*recedence of all the Orders o
41 on Sir J. Kennaway pres
disfranchisement of Nort
rii.4,,eaellted a petition from Nor
Ny" arliament any person of.
decla
ritLe
ocih
er
tku
r.i.eh
eeaniuhlt aeisytur
I,l:ra
n n
ipwhan
pratr. ehatsiyeeoinnuotget
ohdrteahr
e li ue
atil
coo:, it
ez
ta,nhdguethhfeioetshnhrteeiesstntowdel uure
dytei,eoofwmn
the
j
ai et:
et allowed either to affirm or s,
tonly on the 4th section of ti
"hich permitted Quakers, '
:est 45'' the time being appointed
17.2.ffirm instead of swear
aLolg been permitted by the
ti-o-`5l. _leas, under the Evidenc(
eu-LY as a witness, but as a
tWithin the category of "every
lt, further, that to permit M
'''Oove the question Into the
4,41 a court of law, and dilated o
)11415 ch
atMight ensue from ref
C. li'Laren seconded the
1051rGiffard moved as an ar
to the reports and proceedings
l
141.), • Bratilaugh be not permit'
ri—a,ffirmation. At the outset
sliieeinquisitorial in the (
if lie had taken the
_?_(.! WoUld have stopped him.
aet,habPlieepotonifirand:cotsodramiciutotmweitnire,ietitrneneecotoetm,rmiru,asmnsle,ynhrid.e_li,
Ban, ction what it had already P
shifting the decision of a (
"" House would be shirking
tstri/igeaoeckob o h
ursorne
in
aisslsyceomn
a legal decision to be obtain&
stated? And would not the v
to affirm be assumed by the
legally entitled to affirm?
was the forfeiture of the seal
Passing the motion, be ini
debates whether the seat were
Alderman Fowler seconded--
Mr. Serleant Simon rnaintail
by Mr. Labouchere must be cc
reports of the two eornmitteei
inconsistency in the report o
lid thought offered the most p
Mr. firadlaugh he asserted
Without question as a Quaker.
Mr. Warton made some r,
Gov ernMent, and
11r. Whitehead argued in fa
to take the oath, and asserted
for refusing the oath to any
Professed his willingness to ta
at Mr Bradlau,gh had bolo)
and the House had no right t
anYraan.
After Genernl Burnaby, Mr.
all,d Mr. Beresford-Hope had
sgoiect, Mr. Hopwood spoke
and If C. A. O'Connor against
latent The Attorney -General disset
that the illegality of an
34 the firs committee, and P
ar,
• given to the Governmyr
Tracing the history 43
'4141,, never been intended as a,
.iietc,eltictedbeparerisoogn
"Y the fourth section of the
ever a -
afig,„„into.;firekvihanelgresedouanuinbcctoourtpilad aboutwhich,
it tl
„mon the House would be
ir
• arts, for the Courts wou
ether the oath had beenie
tesolution w„,3 passedo;
coo
held that Mr. Bradlaugh
oa
141'1, also, that as . tl
the
out
iGnionsthaanmd e
eithir degArshohetautegtoahfti affirmationagainst the ttaho erpiog aslt ,t x
-.4',lLag it to a Courdxti:
sue]
-volts scruples.
ot
hneo
et l
ar
se
ee
sr
of
fo
persons, suchocofi rti apee e'tr ohe
Walpole pointed out ti
4.,.•
&hree classes of Acts—the
of f tehal inaeattlyincremasonfte.l;
to evidence, and the
1,;;•
•itsOus belief. With rep]
Q7.l)Cled On every member
1,--eentions admitted were or
-"rte words "every other Pere
„htlenaratists—who were not
170(1,ao who might hereafter be
to Persons in the post
',ni
vidence Acts applied sole
a Uce, and afforded no justi
ll affirmation to be made in
tt• 111% Bright traced in detail ljna
a when Mr. Bradlaugh
„eoe presentation of the last
" tact that Mr. Bradlaugh
eath, that he hi,d merely exl
INg, and that he had always
a_tr his honour and conscienc
oht desiring to disparage it
Mat doubt ; and wit;
thought lir. Bradlaugh
the
la being \ refused the oat
aflirmation. There was
into a man's religious views'
sworn. Thisiaterference, hi
test of Theism, and would c knew that many people
ue,.Sthan others have,' said
thow_having myself pa
Oonderma, without syrupatlq
able to adopt the views WI
Ineolhers of this House of e all,
trust, of one religion,
.aritY, and 1 orbearance, at
• ere are those who belong
tleed not remind them of
gone through in
- or 300 years or More,
1-" e kept out of this
-tote class of arguments
inember for Surrey used. (
rY long time past there
'es, to doubt. Did he eve]
tooted these relaxations? I
Et,,,lutre heard these question
,;sz"t I never fouud that the
liosite. represented by go
"ialog to wake those relai
411Furrient, not to sentiment
'4l)ilsitted only to a mai
tilifi..B:erniTotoushieiha(Cit
ttheeez.)areTlsies
-'l,lk it is rather in the flat
„1-wh9 have great doubts as
"e•ou. It is occasions
st
Drinciples Rear, hear.)
Pa the Fora:lcier of Christ
▪ ilouse to defend the ri
suppose now that t
VaLtt,be interested in the f.
6,, o and takes his nam
4rtnurs)—and another ii
I reverently and hone
ecluded? But one thing
.(2;aueetitdeoiuniirusasrueffparpreusalegiutztieuingcaout.cli
ekr, hear.)
The lecto
th-allcis, of the borough
ei
of ugl
• ~oherx3 to Parliament.
oe the other. All the c,
(011,Y relY upon it, will c
th'pesitton and counter
but the whole of ti
• Will find the workinE
I::4BBazaseeivohofof C°lvtihnishanithoinmosptiniibocn:;
ge extent the working I
4.-14 Y kore for the dogmas
i'd•sses care for the prectii
4-2tol cries of 'Oh!' and
it were otherwise. (C
ts•'-.) But of this lam
'Uolted to take in dealin
'Zleraan honestly, openly, f.
rinstituency will be prod
lloUse into contralti
atituency, and may bring
'which the Rouge of Coma
anotheC cue some 100 yea
!?ppositetlh I daresay,
'l4al'e that they are the a
TA decency, mid of I Imi

Mi..-