The Dorset County Express and Agricultural Gazette.
Dorchester, Dorset, England, 1866-05-15 00:00:00

WEYMOUTH COUNTY COURT.

Judp Everett held hi. Court hem oa Thursday last.
There were upwards of 150 mess as the list, and
altboush most of them related to matters of an nein-
serrating eharmaer to the public, the Court was
itocupiel an unusual length of time.
ACTION AGAIN/ft • POILIC•11 FOB EJECTING • NAN
nom HIS Paganism. —Ceurege v. Perkomn. Mr.
Howard was for the defendant. —loom wale sines, the
plaintiff, • boatman. residing on the Chapslry, want
Into defendant's skittle allay labs at sight, and corn-
messed play's( with so u• other men. Not having
change, he sail be pee the lendiord sizpenes for six-
pennyworth of coppers. The landlord said be did not,
and plaintiff ladled the landlord s "thief." sesompanying
tie word with • very foul epidtst. The landlord told
him he would not have such language uerd on Ms
. .

promisee, and bid ban be off. Henteeed to go. The
landltird then took bold of him to put him off, when a
strargla ensued, and both 1.11. The plaintiff rad be
aem d injured by the fall that he err obliged to hare •
deetor, who gave him two bottle, of lotion to nib into
his knee, for which be charged lib. His knee was not
-ell yet, hot he thoecht It wasn't worth while haying
I any atom at that tdaff He was are obliged lo keep
holiday for • fortnight in nonesquenee at the Wary las
received. For too of time he charged 15.. a week, whieb
no o..n.iderrd was cheap as he some tinter earned 20..
or 2U • wmk. Ho celled as • wirier P.C. English
who, seeing the skirls • ley open.. lam at night went
n. Just as be went in he heard the plsintiff sell the
iletendsnt a very foulrpithet. Defendant then ordered
plaintiff if the premise% end.. he would not go civilly
he pet him at A beailk earned end both felt but the
landlord dad not re more fore* than woe Decertify to
at him ont.—Judge to plaintiff: Wl.y your own
grime+ jeerer. the laDdlord in what he did. You
must be non-suited.

_
FLILAIN Or • Loire RONXrartn. —Bayne v. Haullekl.
Mr. Andrves, o( Dorehem. r, Appeared for tits defence.
The plaistiff, to his ox nation in chief, said that
*beet ale years ego he hired himself to Mr. William
Dodge, hr. bailiff. He did not resoling the
year ..or month when la eorered on the service.. His
hiring woe weekly one, 18 10.. per week, house rent
and garden free After corking there bottom' taro sad
hoe sears, he loft, but could not recollect the day no.
eves the month when he left. They parted become
It.. Deli* Rod he could not agree. —la erose-extroinatko
' plidittiff admitted that his hiring aaa from Old Lady
may to Old Lady Day, that be left in the middle of
harvest, that he yeas aummooed before thy County
Bench at Doreitester, and Aped fro leaving his aerviee
withoet notice, and before the period for which he had
hired himself had expired. and that be had before seed
Mr. har bold for this money and that the @stomata had
been diemimed. The Judge Why man, you have
not a single leg to stand upon. According to your on.
seknowledgment you were. yearly servant, .041 f ria
W. a da. b. fore the period of your agreement expired,
and the shot, wages of tbe period eras due to you you
' eould not recover ooe farthing. You have tleody sued
for this money before the magistrates and they very
correctly dismissed your summons. I shell Wee dismiss
the stateroom. liii impossible for you to mover a
farthing.

Doo CIAIIIL—Leno v. Bowmen. The defendant,
*bile on a vieit to Portland.aast soon young does belong-
ing to the plantiff mid ripened his wish to have nor,
the prim bring • pound each. On the ffith February,
nlantiff went him one with . note to the a ot that if he
liked lab. eras to mod him the money, and that if after
keeping it 'fortnight he did on like it, he wee to return
me dog. The dog not being returned plantiff wrote three
leder. to the defendant but maned no answer to
in, of them. The defendant said that be never meant
to beep the dog from the ern. He did not reply to
pluntife letters became he thought dm thing was of no
Peat importance, mid he did not return the dog bdon
Moans he had no opportunity without sending a person
end •Ily Ire or di miles to Dorobeeter for the mall man
to take lb* animal to Portlier!. He had sines the
...vim of the summoos mat do dog, bat be understood
Um plaintiff would not reiteive it bask, and it no now
at the Onree at Dorchester. The judp mid the a.-
Nedant had had plenty of time to return the dog and
'be plaintiff was not now obliged to take it beak. He
meet py the amount claimed.
Buena vita Witomo Patient Benjamin White,
v. Joseph Petters.— lir. Howard appeared for tbe
plaintiff, and Mr. Hill for the defeodant —The parties
in at Portland, and the motion was brooght to re
mew the value of a envie, which it was alleged Pie
'deaden' had taken away. The case was a very coin-
hissed one, bet the male fasts are briefly then. if,..
Spumes, was the owner of two bourn in whin nodded
the plaintiff and the defendant. Alma residing then
A/Mll tiOt• the two enhanced madness, and when they
did so, pleintiff took away the copper that hart been
toed in the home be had ocempied, but on die re-
monstrance of Mrs. Whits. the eteemother of the
plaintiff and of Mrs. Somme. it one taken bask. Whet
lin Wiiite het to do in the business did not appear.
Bohardtwooth Plaintiff Panned the two bowmen of his
deter. lire. Sneerer, and when the defendant left the
nerepetin of the cottage he noted, it was found dot
no copper was in the bowie, sod bane the pressed
44itios. What becalm of the mower did not very plainly
appear. In moppet of the plaintirs ens it wait amoned
that In maw queues of Mrs. White. demand, It was
mat haek by Mrs. While'. servant to the home whae,.
It had been taken—the home occupied by the defendant,
and pineit.ffs wit* mil shei saw the servant take it in
there. The defendcat and Lis wife both dewed this—
they hod men seen the popper. There were the marks
left whim they Ist wait there, where it had been palled
•lown, and Mrs Whites menet oorroborated them than
far, that she Dever took it back. She said the did bike
It away at plaintiff's regent, and afterwards carried it
Mak sad pet it into tlie beak hoses. The plaintiff and
his dater both stated that on on Domain when de ,
feadant was notes to about It he said lie bed mt got it
nor had he had the copper, but that it was Mrs. White
who hod ie.—The 'edge 'boastt dent mu no evidence
against Was defendant. He did not know what Mn.
White had to do with the copper, bat it append thec
when the pkintrff removed from one bonne to de other,
aid removed die noper.she demanded its being remand
to the plan whence it was taken, and the plaintiff gave
it up to her wryest. She was the party, be 1111.101'.
MOSS likely to koow where it was or whet bad Dena
of it. The plaintiff had summoned the weesig person,
bed mem be beeresieed.