The Dorset County Express and Agricultural Gazette.
Dorchester, Dorset, England, 1869-01-19 00:00:00

13otij Salts of Vublic duestionis.

IS THE GREEK
JUSTIFIED IN SK
CONFERENCE?

?MINI POITATI A R Y
ILDINO Fitt Ali Tli E.

Phiihollerees say
because—
l. Tin Greco-Tart diz.
pate is on • queation f
international law, ea to
which both sided have
equal rights and equal
interest., and should, there-
fore, have ea equal votes in
its decision.

Taroophiles say
noontime-
1. Tile only g.nond upon
whialt the Conference rests
th..t °peered by the treats
of Paris. Were that groand
not taken, the Ore be and
Turks would be left to
settle the dispute for them-
selves, which would be
manifestly for the dis-
advantage of Grcwee.
2. As Greece was not
ooe of the signatory ;rowel •
to the treaty of Par* Ills
clear that .he can hays on
twee for exerng a voice
, a Conference which has
' really root for its revision,
and even the coneesidon to
her repreesetative of the
right to speak at the eon-
ferential deliberations is
only made as a matter of
convenience.
3. The Greek Govern-
ment has known from the
first that thew were the
oonditions under whieb
alone the Coot scene. could
be held, and should have
objected earlier If at all.
4. Greece will has. to
accept the deetsion of the
Conference whatever i•
may be, and ugly throw.
away a chore° by seceding
from its deliberations.

2. The proposal that the
Greek mu:deter should be
allowed to speak but not
to vote, while the Tort
wee to be allowed both to
speak and to vote in the
deliberations, is, therefore,
not only nojast but Alward.

3. The treaty of Paris
has nothing to do with the
matter, which is a purely
separate question of right
and wrong, arising under
carsamstanees ant affected
in any way by that treaty.
4. A oonferenee eon-
dilated upon inch partial
principles is a - mockery,
and its decision sannot be
binding upon Oreeoc.

SHOULD THE DECISION OF THE PRIVY
COUNCIL, PROHIBITING GENUFLEXION
AND THE USE OF LIGHTED CA SULKS
IN THE COMMUNION SERVICE, RE
OBEYED?

Advanced and obstinate
Ritualists say " No, be-

Moderate and pissed.
Ritualists say 'Yes," bar
calm-
1. Tin decision
effects seressosial, wra
Is sotassistiesty solstpor-
taut, sad dams no* leach
&militia

L Obedianoe to It is-
wolves a departunt from
the practise of the peiwitive
Catholic Church (ot whish
the Anglican Church is but
a oontinuetion) and conse-
quently a sepention of the
eonnection with that pr
int. church.
2. Obediseoe to it in-
volves the abandoentes.t of
the doctrine of the Real
Yreernoe.

2. AU good °Miens are
bound to obey *yew
erroneous desinnis at the
law when pronoweeed by
probperianleonsti to
kited
; and if they
object to the tribunals,
they should agitate for
Annie in them.

3. The Court whisk haa
given the decision it, from
the omission in its con-
stitution of any condition
of adequate ecclesiastical
knowledge or ecolesisationi
representation, inoom•
potent to decide matter'
of °harsh doctrine to'
°ammonia'.

3. °balite** be tbe de-
claim', although it may
involve apparent, does cot
involve real mparetion
from tbe primitive °bomb,
for soiliag sin egoot that.

4- It is the duty of the
church to disregard all
ordinances and deeose
that conflict with the pri-
mary duty of obedience to
the law of the church.

4. The doctrine of the
Real Presence, chilli is
not forbidden, oaa be
equally wall taught without
the lighes, which ane fos-
biddenr.