The Dorset County Express and Agricultural Gazette.
Dorchester, Dorset, England, 1883-11-20 00:00:00

FOUNDERING OF A BCHOONER OFF
PORTLAND. .

• -•• • - •
About four o'clook on Wsdneslay morning the
three:2l'4ld Grman Salt toner •' Falke," C iptain
Weed* from Newcastle to Lisbon, with • cargo of
oaf, ooke, and bricks, f muciered off Portland. On
Tuesday niel.t the schooner sprang • leak when about
16 miles south of Portland, every endeavour wee made
to keep the taster down, but the water giieed to fast
that the captain and crew had to take to their boat,
saving a few articles of clothing, • dog, and some
nautical instrumeeta. They remained by the gip all
night, suffering bitterly from the cold, there being •
*even brat. About four a.m, their vessel went
down and when daylight broke they pulled for the
land, and after rowing for nearly tux boars they got
ashore at Oemingtou, when they were in a most
exhausted conditioo. A fisherman, named Bags, same
to their moos end took them up t
the coastguard station where they were fed
and attended to In • most kindly manner
by Mr. U. Brown, the chief °Moir. They
were afterwards sent to Weymouth under 3dr. Brown's
charge, and taken to the Sailor's Horne. Mx. Aides,
the German Ommul, was communicated with, and the
°spiels and crew lure dispatched to their bootee on the
following day.

COUNTY 0011 RE
TRITIMAT.—Wdore Yr. 7.1. Barrel (Aating-Judew.
Tili SKIPPING COSI.
Vallenee v. Valle.-11r. Howard for plaintiff and Yr.
Jail., for didendsat.—This ease bad been adjourned from
the lug Cannon a qoaettock of coetc—Mr. objected
that statutory netics of defence should bays been given.—
His Honour mimed the objection stating such was not
a comely. flerjeant Atkineon'a decision ea to 'biocide we.
U there was no apnea ea the pert of the defendent there
would be no ord. r f.or code —t ast was that wok party would
Pee his own code I but If there an was elapsel on the part
of the defendant, then toere would be an ordrr for toe
payment of defendant's ousts. H. was canversalot with
Ito whole cast, end ho 10.4, concurred in the tainted
ilerjesat's deeisiod —ll.r. J AU& Latinist hia intention
of appealing against the decalon.
CLAIMS POI AAAAAA DONS DT LITZ STOCK.
aerate Herridge v. Henry Bailed, of Park-street.
Weymouth.—Cuuto Al for denude done by defendant's
Idte, fowls, nod donkeys in • garden on the Weymouth
and Portland Railway in April last.—Mr. Hoeerd 83Wee
, appeared for the plaintiff.--asorge li,rriclite stated
defendant'a live stock broke into his garden and did
damage to his potatoes, °dons. and cabbage to the
extent of the amount clainisd.—Kr. Bowen oostended
that it was not defendant's few, but the plaintiff's.—
His Honour thought a man was bound to keep Me pigs in
the proper playa which was toe sty. and. i ha allowed
them to run snout. slid they broke into another pawn's
garden, tba owner of the pigs was reepon•ible (r the
image. It, however, appeared the garden we. on the
' 'railway embankment and if the fence was not sufficient
sad the pigs got through it. the company Were reetoondbl&
H. non-sultedi the plaintiff.
James Haines, cow-keeper. v. John Lovell, both of
Wylie Regia.-11r. Bowen appeared for phintiff. and
Kr. George for defendant. Plaintiff claimed did,
damage datired to have been sitstelued through defend-
ant having pulled down a cowshed, and thereby caused
&predation In the value of • calf, four cow., and three
Am the consequence of Vietr not being provided with
prp.rshelter, front July to the beelioniog of November,
Hr. Bowen haring stated tba facto of the case,
called the plaintiff. who said he was a cow-keeper. liv-
ing at Wyk., and took the premises In queetion of
Yr. John Groves In the solemn of 1881; he eftirwarde
became • tenant of defendant Hr. Graves fitted
up a oowahed to his sat 'faction. He paid £l7 a yea:
far rent. On the gird of June led he had
awe. readout with defendant, who asked him if he
bad mar objection to his putting • wail In front of
Me cowshed. as he had some idea of erecting some
cottage., and if he did so he would provide him a pleas
to his advent/ye. lie prontieed to fit up the lower
Portion of the brewery. He (Plaintiff) told him anything
Which WM right and reillOe•tde be Would COneeni
About a fortnight atm defendant knocked down the
front of the cowshed daring hie aheeece. He anode to
him the next day. and he said he would gel • man to
rebuild the wall eo as not 1. pet him loony inconvenienoe.
but no one came do anything to the wail lot • fort-
night, The meson started Wilding the wall, but did not
Sabah. • few dap stir defendant's man began to pull
out hie stalled., when be objected unless be gave him the
acaommodation which be had promised, and defendant
promised to fit up the breeres7 an stay or two, but he had
not done so, and had not done it yet. Had reminded
defendant many times of his promises, when he said ha
would fit up the brewery. He had four cows in the shed,
which be milked there twice a di! and fed. Be also had
three pigs there and a fat mi. Ho was using the loft
for storing fodder. If it had not been foe &lea iant's
twouthie he shoold not have allowed him to Dull down
the p-etaises. The call bat a chill. It was worth IA
before the ',teatime were pulled down, but he had to soli
lifer £314.. • fortnight aft wwarle. A calf which was
being fatted Woe 'unpaid t terries* 101. • week in value.
He had no plan to milk his case; Ito had in doe. any-
where, and had to feed them in the open. Two of his
COWS Were dee to moire at the Latter pal of August,
and be spoke to defendant over and over again to get
a plane reedy for them Oae of It. caws lord one
of her milking quart...re from °stoking a cold through
exposure. At last he (plaintiff) knocked up • teratoorerr
shelter for his cows, the materiels and labour coding
At He wee offered £46 for two wove when they
calved et the beginning of August The cows were aorta
each before the shed WM/ pulled down now they
were not worth more than MA Defendant laid be would
bay them at that price.—Pmintiff, in further examine-
lion, said he had to fit up a place for hie pigs • quarter
of • mile away which cost him da He had to bring food
for them from hie house. Headlined denudes foe things
which had been pet into the' yard and damaged. A cow
stepped oe ose'rd the waggon shaft, and broke It; two
more were too." • ape azother. and broke the wheel.
.&olten • 'toaplicactwool

__.o iinteinic . _
17.-;ir-ow. A bath was o, .., *WWI --41 of
falling on ft o
- waggon cost 7.. GA to repair, Use bath
was worth M. , sof the wheelbwrow 10 aSA If I.
had had Pomo, &accommodation them things wood& sot
have been in the yard and got damaged. He paid the
rail amount of ais rear, but it was under &straw—Oros.-
examined : if. bad olarlderabily reduced the amorist of
hie dungy" He Orel wantwl 130. When he saw de-
fendant on the Med of Jam he did not say he wanted
possession at the promises, and if be did not Imre he
'Meld have to eve Isim minas to vacate the whole of
Shama and rather then do that be did not moralise to give
up a.. oowshed._ Be put a shed in his own laid for
his cows. Ile had a shod thw's, bet it was only for fowl,.
He bad never used it for rows U. hod only about an
sore and obelf of land. Whim be bed the Avid he was
able t, feed the cows with artificial food. 111 that the
st•le wie snore andel t• him thou anything Me,. U.
would swear defendant And promised to give him bettor
scomnimointioa than he had. The pigs were in the yard
from June to September, suds pretty time they bed of it
whit with brinks mort&r, and mob like; it woe a womder
they wore not !ibid.—Henry Dotais said ha bad been
mined up with cow. all his ids He had bows plaintiffs
stook far ~1. Ho tomeidared his cows wore meth LIO
each and the calf £4 before the Prowiese it which thor
were beg were realest down. Be thought the pies wore
worth The cows were wort) now only LIS each.
Tee brewery waa sot it to plum cows in sel•.l it had
Mos repairs!. Stall fed cattle 'ay ranch depredated Is
value when tamed into • yard, and pleistiffs ones were
not mach out or condition.—Orrier..xamlned : We arose
partly from insalcisracy of food sad exposure. The Pile
did sot isaresse in else not front want of food, but became
they 'add not ham their rest and sleep.—Jotta Bird, a
dalryrsta, said ho thought the wows had deoraciete I quits
Min vales—Joseph Baal* II•1.1 be worked for &fen lant
b•July lad. He ressissabered Plana 'Woe defetmlusl
wore be should hive his cow. In to be Vivi no, whit Chi
latter told kilos be would get • place ready tort em In •
day or two In Vie cellar of tic. hr 'wiry. The c, cc could
hiri biped thore beam mi it was Clod with timb,r. —Tomas
Thatcher, this mama •h• was *aimed M d,fooloit I,
pull down the wall, proved hearing him tell Wand!, he
Would est • place ready for his row in • day or two.
rigs was plaintiffs cam, and Hr. (Moro contiin lei the
smogse on the Int hum were too remote to be sue-
mid, but the lodge said he would at ones ovarrule
at objection. and Mr. George could apply f r a new
ial If be liked.—Mr. Ger age said ton the 13-ti of June
• fresh arrangement was time to between Pleiutil and
fondant, the foramw consenting to give up the o inched
nd pal, the mine wrist of rent. If any dams:of teal
!la sol the
stitial:id prwaiv.i2drou:nhdiun6ofilftir'onmciwoafntl,lf
shelter.—Drilindiiat said he formerly lined at Ifireke:
pad bought the premises In question from Kr. John
Groves, at which time Haines oral In possession. On
the 1111 rd of June be told him be int nedol torrnlog the
iyie toed into cottages and wonted possession of the shed
pt coos; if he would do so he mold rotate the house and
pa 'den, if pot he would have to leave altapther. II •Inee
show the formai shiireative, and he (defendant) took
Dowsed in of this shed at owe. He sever promised to give
low further aro musodation I hie cattle. Plaianil
&misted in pulling doves the shier, and yam most Messily
with him op to the Nth of fireptitozber. Haines had mow
✓ t snoturr boos; baring lea the otbec without notice.
Us
(defendant) had sawn sows Is the house which plaintiff
said wea only need for fowls Ho had bought cows from
plaintiff from out of the abed, aid bad also seat hits keep
pigs there. Bolero the shed we. pulled down plaintiff
brought his sows there simply t • be milked. and than sent
Pm, swot again. Re timie pommel= of the ehad with
plaintiffs moment and conourrenoa—Ann L welt defend-
ant's wire, said she was protect at the interview on the
t3rd of Imo. and corroborated her husband's sistemest
Jame. Macklin took possession of plaintiffs home for
rout in °Mabee Plaintiff thou told Min he monsent of to
give ep poseseeion of • cow shed on being linked to do so.
—Jamie DoweU, a moon who worked for plaintiff, said
be did not hear defendant mew promise to proride
amoramodation for plaintiffs cowl, neither did he ever
hoar plaietiff complain of being turned out of hie shed.—
At thL. Meese of the proceeding, oho jots tAld Gr. Bowes
ha thought in the trot plains be . was Mak 1814 out • very
Vitagm oldch it would : ill to answer, but
it.passsow coattail. OW I Uto evidonce of
defendant and hie witnesses, form • Aillotoot
. . .... . . . .