The Dorset County Express and Agricultural Gazette.
Dorchester, Dorset, England, 1860-06-26 00:00:00

Lord J. Ream!, in reply to Mr. Griffith's inquiry, been • respectable servant before I was married. I
said the Government had received information of the , mained in the hall shout a quarter of an lour. tjy.
capture of the two vessels, but no account confirming defendant went into a room, had the two w
the statement in the journals of the hoisting of English brought before him, and examined thew and aent the:
colours. With reference to the remarks of Sir It. Peel, away to the cells. The matron of the spinnintb,
he stated that the note of M. Thouvenel, which he had then took me before the defendant. lie aah-4
received only that afternoon, did not contain the me what I had to say for myself. mkt
passage upon which Sir Robert had founded his remarks. it was a cruel thing to be brought there, and that, a.
He detailed the substance of the note, the object of I was working for respecteble shops, it would be inie—
which was to reconcile the Necond article of the Treaty risme to my character. He said, "You were want;e-
of Turin with the 92nd article of that of Vienna in with two prostitutes." I said 1 did not consider Niel
regard to the neutralized territory, Ile recounted the such, as I knew they worked for their living. He asked
different propositions made with a view to that end, ine who I was, and I said, "Itis nu business' of rum:.
observing that France bad not consented to the prop°. lie sad, "Your name is Cattaway ?" I said, "
•ition which Her Majesty's Government had thought is." lie asked me if I was married. I replied "y. •
, would afford an equivalent security to Switzerland. He .and he said lie did not wish to detain me any longer.
hoped that he should very soon be able to place a pot- WAS in the opinning-house altogether about half an boar
lion of these voluminous papers upon the table. —Cross-examined : I do not keep lodgers in my h
Colonel Dlckno)l called attention to the present state I have had on several occasions one uninarried femid;
of the army in the United Kingdom, oontending that, lodger at a time. They were not girls of the town types
in the present state of Europe, we required a larger they lodged with me that lam aware of. They used te
force, and suggesting means by which the additional do waabing and needlework for • living. Miss Bell.
force could be raised. who went home with me, is supported by her uncle, sad
Mr. S. HERBERT replied to Colonel Dickson, ex- goes out to needlework. I did not know Brockwell
plaiuing in much detail the state of the army, and the Beton to be girls of the town. I believe the formalr e
measures taken for its improvement in number and I • married woman.—Emily Bell deposed : I reside with
condition, uncle, a marine store dealer. He supports me, and Ig.
The motion for adjournment was agreed to. out to needlework. I Lave never been put in the spin.
On the order for going into committee upon the ning-homie. On the night in question I was talking to
Savings-banks' and Friendly Societies' Investmeuta the plaintiff in St. Andrew's-etreet. I law the presto,
Bill, and his two men come across the street toward, the
Sir li, Wlt.l.irotliir culled attention to the main plaintiff. Miss Brockwell and Miss Itetsson were with
principle of the Bill, and to that portion of the report of her. The to.; latter were taken to the spinning-house.
the Select Committee on Savings-banks of 1858 which Mrs. Cutaway had passed the door when the" bulldogs.
relates to the investments of the of the savings- went no to her and told her she must go in. she anid
hanks,—" that no sales, purchases, or excliangee of she had dune nothing wrong, and would not go in. The
stocks or securities held by the Counnission ball be men eukii she must, and they forced her in by the
made, except as repuired for the purposes of the shoulders. Cross-examined : Last October twelve-
savings-banks ; and that no funding of the Exchequer- ' month I was in the union for • month • and I lived se
bills lucid by the Commission shall in future be made one occasion with Mrs. Cattaway. Last October twelve.
without the authority of a special Act .4 Parliament." month [had • child; and it was then that I was obliged
He contended that there was a deficiency of assets of the , to go to the workhouse.--Harriet Beaton deposed
savings-banks' money to the emount of 1:3,500,000, end obtain my living by taking care of an infant—Mr
complained of an irresponsible power over this money dames : You don't mean by that, I suppose, an us.
Being lodged in the hands of ex officio Commissioners, graduate under 21? (Laugliter.)—Witnens : Ko ;
and that the millions had been bought and sold by the I was with the plaintiff. The proctor and his men cams
Finance Minister f the day for state purposes. The up. We were conducting ourselves in • proper manner
powers of the Commisaioners bad, he said, been on the night in question.--Croes-examined : I have
exercised to the extent of creating a new debt without , been in the spitiningshouse before. I told the proctor
the knowledge of Parliament. • should not have come out that night if I thought he
Mr. HAMMY opposed the Bill, which created, in his I was walking the streets. (Laughter.) I told him I
opinion an unnecessary machinery. He complained of thought the term was over. am afraid of the peseta,
the recommendations of the committee of lers'e having because lie had taken me before. I don't know the
been ignored, and that the Bill did not treat the fuuds other proctor. (Laughter.)— Re-examined : They take
as trust property, us wherever they find us, no matter where we are going.
Mr. S. Eill'txii:HT objected to the Bill that it WWI About six weeks before he took me to the spinning.
defective, in dealing only with a part of the subject, i house, and kept me there three daye.—Verdict for the
namely investments, leaving the other important por- I plaiLtiif, damages kW.
Cons, which vitally affect savings-banks, and called I
loudly for settlenient, untouched. With respect to
investuients, he argued that the Bill would recognize
the deficiency and establish it as a debt, while it
diminished the security of the fund.
Colonel STIED; argued that the savings-banks money
shotild he treated assa trunt fund.
Mr. kittlins was of the same opinion, insisting that
these moneys should not be used by the Govenonent in
operations upon the funds for " rigging" the market.
He agreed with Sir H. Willoughby that the trustees
should be persons who could attend to their functions.
. . .

BANKRI'PTS.

From the London awelle of Tuesday.

Charles hl—sid-1,•;,- Alma-zquare, Hill-road, Ht. John's.

wood, builder:
Arthur and TIIIMMIX Wentworth, Skin-market, Be,-
_ _

mon.lsey, hide saissmen.
Hugh Roughen, Norwich, chemist.
John Goodall Brett, Hornchnrch, Esser, grocer.
Daniel Fryer, Great George-street, Bermondsey,

machinist:l
John Paget, Brierley-hill, Staffordshire, licensed Tie-

The CHLICZI.LOR of the EXCHEQUER, in reply to Mr.
Esteourt, observed that the. matters connected with
. . . . . .

savings-hanks to which be had referred, were extreinely
iliflicult to deal with, prolilenis which it had been
hitherto found impowlible to solve, and they were dis-
tinct from the mode in which the money should be used.
. . . . . .

tualler.
Marshall John Stacey, Leeds. dealer in tea.
James Gibson, Todmortlen, Yorkshire, manufacturer.
John Itsmforcl, Stainland, York%hire, grocer.
Henry Mahlon, Ecclesfield. Yorkshire, butcher.
John Heald, ben., and John Heald, jun.. &listtoo,

The charge, that he had entirely ignonid the report of
the C,mninittee of 18M, he denied, two of their recom-
mendations having been embodied in the Bill. The
main .pmations raised in the discussion, he observed,
were two,—first, the composition of the commiasion,
which, it was said, should he independent ; second, that
the money ought to be dealt with in the same manner
as trust money. But he maintained that this was not
a trust ; that the public stoat in relation to the
only as banker; and it was absurd to constitute an inde-
pendent commission to manage money in a banker's
hands. The Bill proposed to give to depositors in
savings-banka—who, at this moment, it was alleged, had
n.. strict title in law to their monsy—a perfect and abso-
lute title, and, further, it provided for a trueaccount of
. . . .

-- .... -. . _ .
Derbyshire. shoemakers. _ _
John Hughes, Liverpool, licensed victualler.
Williams Granville -arpe, Edge-hill. near Liverviol.

timber merchant. _
William Seabrook Chalkley, Liverpool, shipowner.
(From the London Gazette of Friday.)

-
John Faulkner. Connuercial-road, Surrey, cab pro-
prieh r.
William Hilliard, otherwise William Hilliard Bevis,
Burghclere, Hampshire, !mister.
.Tolin Tombs, Churchatreet. Westminster. builder.
George Curtis. Landport, licensed victualler.
James Berry Blackburn, Norwich. currier.
TI Harrison, Hanley-upon-Thames, Oxfordshire,
tailor.
John Bissell (lark, Droitwitch, salt manufacturer.
Joseph and Samuel Henry Holland, Birmingham,
printers.
John Chilton, Stone, Staffordshire, shoe manufacturer.
James Young, Highbridge, Somersetahire. draper.
Edward James Hopkins, Fiabponds, Gloncestenhin,
Imper.
William Revitt. Sheffield, rani!. manufacturer.
John Morgan, Manchester, clay merchant.

the national debt.
Mr. T. BAKING defended the Committee of HO&
He admitted that the power exercised by the Chancellor
of the Exchequer over these funds might be for beneficial
purposes; but the question was whether, in the exer-
cise of this uncontrolled power, he always considered
the interests of the depositor* or Hist of the public, and
whether his act. was always judicious and safe.
. . .

Mr. A 1 RIJN thought the Chancellor of the Exchequer
had taken s most complicated course in this Hill to
effect his object, and that cannellini; a part of the
national debt and creating a new book debt was a very