The Dorset County Express and Agricultural Gazette.
Dorchester, Dorset, England, 1878-02-26 00:00:00

UPIIIT.

sma,ao a Corr.-4it the Weymouth County Court on
t.V. Nora was • claim for for • cert.
Zir;s4;ns,a.l tieing the money. and the Judge said
that tem eery Aesseible. it would save half the hearing fee.
D.f,...)ast thee add he disputed paying it. (Lai/bier.)
..n0,4,4 tha• they ureed he should work it out.-
w. !toper asemmtel to this: hut said defendant would not
wk. °meth be had offered hint a journey tip hill or
The wkin.: out was to It., by haulm& but
.i.o• emit.? do nothing. - Helen 11112 t mail. a I
.• •tement, at the and of which he sai•l olalntid told hiss
I pt him in the 4:tenuity CA121.11. li flour:' And
is ri.:ht to-Mr. Riper said he eam sorry to COMO i's
C art: h. sold the tort to Mr. Ma-i. as friend, vn'i
lisia.d us on Min as a friend now. -Ftnallv tries taut
It.. paw P. .1f at once, and It If in:, 1.14.11thl and put
...Ur' MI/n.l On Vl': t.114..-The Judge thought • efendant
.• odd pay all if he likeo hut this he denial. en lit was
.4,...,1 h. should pay half in a mouth. Plaintiffs costs
ales
Airrioe EJIMIIIICIT.-Denl44 v. F. BorditeA -Ur.
W.- A oi, of Do: co. iti.r .411110: 11 11, Mr. Dor ten, :rush..
•nir a will proved in •Amerehy -t .1.1 proper e it
wa left to Mr.. B .atel urr children. )Ira.
IS A ditch's huabsed lived in the house, but had re-
pu Itsted his tenancy to the traat!es. Asper they had
nothing to di, with It. -ye, flans. Vail defen lent had
held 11 years; he (Mr. flannel had not long been in.
tr,l,te,l. and asked for an adjournment. Mr. Westin
• .id the husband and wile lived together until the con:
duct of the husband was ao bail that the wife au ofiliged
to leave. The last reeeipt he (Mr. W'etston) hull (or rent
was sizned hy Mrs. Bowditch on the 3rl of Mat, KO.
The rents were to be paid to Illrg B. .ditch under the
will for her separate use, hut the husband now repudiates
the tenancy, end •Ay•-" I shall n it go •.13t of the house
you give me glee. Mrs. Bienfech has only • life
iptereAt in the property, and the trudees w .ut U.. house
t • put it in a proper ilia, of r. pair. Anil also to let it to •
1..,. Ant, and Moodu the itiohey.-The Jude,: The .111
makes no provid a for We. 80. &tell hving 111 tb., boss.?
-Mr. Weston -aid is, Hone. said the property e
.pyhold, and he did not know whither the tnis•e• • had
n admitted tepaniss defendant bad occupied the
toe Mem for the last 33 years, eud had not paid an atom
ot rot-The Judge: lie is simply entitled to the profit%
•it not live in the lioua..-Mr. Hamm said that in
N.A,lllller the present plaintiff issued • summons against
lout eA • tenant holding over: they abandoned
. • pf.PC:r*.lists anil in.tituted the preemie Seeing
• A.., ear: cert .in p 4nte in tbe rase, he asked his Honour
to grant an adj men men'. -Mr. Weston said the SIUOUP.II4
on the lak of I)svaber. the parties had bad tweed of
• i• in, lie therefore °hire., to any adjournment. -His
I? Irking at the items of the will. dui not 'we that
Mr Henna could have any selsitAntial defence, and
spi ntiff most have possession. -Defendant mid there were
g. ,•••• In the h eise and a pigetve pu up in the gerden,
he take theme assay /-111 i limner replied if the
pr piety were sold, the wife would reap the benefit of all
.105 there. When could defendant give up possession
lAifivelant sill lie would give op at °non if be must.-
llonour would allow the defendant a week, hut be
e. 1,1 rather give it up at once.-Order accordlngly.-
loe optimal said instead of his using his wife badly she
“.'.illy had .0.000 rash; the fact was he was too easy
witl her.