The Dorset County Express and Agricultural Gazette.
Dorchester, Dorset, England, 1871-06-27 00:00:00

COUNTY COURT.
Before T. E. P. Letroy, Esq., judge.
tee MIST or ILNOLAND SACK COMPAIT.

West of England Sack Company v. flobba—Claim for
£1.9, 9,1, being for the value of 21 sacks not returned, at Si,
and the rest for the hire of 43 lacks.
Mr Weldon., appeared for the Sack Company, who sore also
represented by their manager, Kr Henry Wlppell, of Lenirport,
and Kr George for Mr Hobbs. £4 IS4 was paid into court,
partly for the value, and partly for the hire of sacks, and this
amount was accepted on behalf of the Company. hio coda
were allowed.
West of England Sack Company p John Ward.—Cialm fsr
£23 lm tbd of which part was for tho value, .1 21, of 75 sacks
not returned.
Kr Welaford appeared for the Company, and Mr Howard for
yayrd.
. . .

iiiTlsford stated that whenever any racks are lent by the
=ionsT. they Loy. Kite a form on which ate printed the
Leroy.
on which they wre lent.
From one of them form, we quote the following eon& I
Oboe
" All sacks not returnel within Os months hors the day of
hire will be charged hire for that period, and the sacks aloe
for at 4s each.
charged
~. within three days you repudiate your liability for
them wicks, the Company will bold you reasonable both for
the hire and the sack&
" None will be allowed for union the C,onspany's receipt is
produced.
"The sacks may be hired or returned at any of the Com-
pany's depths.
" It it particularly requested that the agent to whom these
tacks are returned, be informed to whose credit they are to be
placed."
WlppeU deposed that the tenns were thooe on
which the company lend lacks, and they had been adrertiosd ,
by the company, and are well known. The articularo of the '
demand oa 14 Ward had been repeatedly delivered to him.
Boone 4th. Each had been returned, and others had not.
Ti.. int were loot on August 17 11108. 90/0 had been lent, and
Shout 100 railroad.
In mime, to Mr Etawagg., whom mid be bad a portion who
held prove the dellyery.
A better from Kr Ward was produced to the Judge, stating
that the lacks has Legg bad beta returned, and this the
Judge held to be an admission that al claimed for prior to
lar,,abasd. ~,„„,bean TweeesVd, and hai bad that it was for defendant
t.-6---4.0-,..7---ointlations bean retagnad, plaintiff must prove
Kr. Hoeiwill flied that plantlle mud @how when the sacks
110 re loot.
The Judd* odd there wh no dispute in the letter.
Ur Howard inked whether. suppadng he had a house in
MB, and admitted it, would Uud be an admindon that he
held it dosing the whole year 100111
The Judge No; but you my "I owe you no money,
ii-
ma. I gave up the boum." 1 think you taae,, show that the
lege were returned:
Yr Howard: The whole value of them did not amount to a
111111 ant..
Kr Weiderd aid it was Use place of the defeudent to return
mid not het, of the Chrepany to fetch them.
The ledge laded from the conditions of the Company to
alma thell they had ghee oohse that, in cue of the mike not
big Menai ',Min 0 mama, the borrower would be
odaergM fee hire, sad she. tor prime on&
Kr Webbed mid AA le lad had bin of them week& been paid Into Court for the
Ms liwelleild woe sailed to prows the cwt.." of ah soca on
bathe WY 1101. la Oath et the lm endtan awn
adilinleike hit glaitedeases