The Dorset County Express and Agricultural Gazette.
Dorchester, Dorset, England, 1867-09-17 00:00:00

BLANDFORD.

801100411 POUct, Wodotoday.—Rstors W. Finches's.
Rac.—Charios atiionisod •hitosaillh, residing in U..
" R iokery," 131sodford, pissded guilty to • tmsrgs of
Iresimnness, and was Aorta ss. and 3s. 10d. 'nom in
&fault of paying within • weak myna da)s' imprison.
met

_
enWare —Biandined e. Dorchester.—A match
between these two dubs oame off on Tuesday last in
Mr. Lock's field, ulandford when the Blandford Aentle-
own were rietoelogn beating their opponenta in one
timings with 28 runs to spare. Yr. Y. Trull on the
Blandford aide skewed some good play. and the fielding
on time aide was excellent. The following is the Noon :
Dorchester, lot innings. 33, 2nd fzurinp, 36; total, 69.
lilandford, first inninga,67.

Tuner= or Dorms' —nn Saturday last a Amid
session for the Smurfir of licensm won held at the
Townhall. illandlord. The magiatrates present were
W. P. Okeden, Esq., Hon. 'W. H. B. Portman, Mr.
and J. J. Farquoarron, Req.—Tim following ircirefers
were signed Half Moon Inn, White Clif. UM-street,
from C. Coke kr Fanny K. riry; Black Bear, fialishory-
etreet, from C. fitiekland, to Vincent ; Red Lion,
Winterborne Stiekland, from H. Allen to Edwin Cole
Mr. &Pyles of the One of Finch.= and Belles...
solicitor., applied on behalf of M. W. Slope., landlord
of the New Inn, Eaatelset, to,a temporary limos. op
to the 10th Oc.ober neat. He staled that the leant.
ocuil not be transferred, bemire, the farmer landlord
refused to give it op; and the temporary license granted
About two months ago expired that day.—Applicatiou
granted.
Tee FAIR —Our Septennber fair on Monday attracted
• Larger number of dealers nal wisher. than on none
former commons, hat in °oolong...nee of • heavy rain
owning nn in the afternoon. many, who in all orobabilhy
would have been preeent, remained •way. The ...par
of sheep nue not quite no lsrge as Isat year, the number
being 4,700. Trade was brisk, at an advance of from
3a. to 3s. over the Kismet Pritfor* !sir. and a cleanse*
waa made. Wethers (ached from 445. to 154 a.; eat*
from 45e. to "ALI aid lambs from 345. to 40s. A pen
of very superior pare Surma Soutbdown lamb' were
offered by Mr. Jobe Ford. of Rushton, asknoeledpd
to be the finest ever brought forward at this fair,
They raid at fax. eaeh. A Teri limited ellOpl7
bone. trade dull, and price. higher. Cl.ex h .rs *
fetched from RI guineas to 40 guineas. No demand fog
either hooks or riding horses. The chores fair was
moderately well supplied, chieffy household. Trade
was dull, end prio-• on the rim. Household from
37a. to 42..; half-skimmed from 411§. to fffb. The
attraetimis of the pleasure fair were of the usual kind,
With the addition of Day's menagerie, which attracted •
fair amount of patronage.

BLANDFORD COUNTY COURT, MONDAY.
(Mort R. Eviterr, Maq , judge.)

. - -
There were more than the nsual number of muse
entrred at this court, but only 35 original plaint. ream
on for hearing, and most of them were for small
amounts.
Vanner. Coates.-Claine Ed 19s. 7d. The plaintiff
is 4 carpenter and joiner, and defendant a corn dealer,
both residing in Bkodfor:l.-Mr. Atkinson appeared for
defendant, and stated that only one item in the amount
was disputed, and that the rein of tbe claim hal been
paid into score. Thit item irte a charge of 30a. for a
Window fruit -Plaintiff said that ht fandery,lll4s. he
was ordered by the defendant to make a suet to he put
into • building belonning to the defendant. Th.o be
endeavoured to Perm.* MIR not to have it done as it
would be likely to annoy a neighbour, but that the
def. ntlant would listen to him. In the Moira' April,
when he was working on the dehrodenVie premises, and
the bricklayer wao ready to put the frame in, the defend.
ant told the beirklayer he would not bar. the work
done.-By Mr. Atkinson: I will not undertake to mesr
it was not in May, 11361, the window frame was orders I.
It was delivered eight weeks ago. 1 Was to keep st for
the defendant till he wanted it. The frame was made
in April. 1865. The brass palliest were not put in the
day before delivery. I had • nee for thou first put in,
and about three month. ago I pot in some others. I
had no orders to deliver the francs from the defendant.
, ordered a lad in my employ to put the frame near
I Mr. Coeur' premiere. / mitt the hid on Baturdey, and
I applied for a County Court summons the following
I Monday. I hate had de ilino with Iffe Costes many
years; I have worked for Mm a long time, and bevelled
repeated wettlemente of accounts mom the order -as
given for the frame; but T did not send the account in
for that. When I called for the amount in dispute
CrViiliassm sksi said be
Shepherd,
pauy
wmyeerw stated that ho
when
tehe thoaeli gstproit 2
imelr.
-
month. ado he heard the didenrient may "I shall have that
fume," Mr. Veneer reMbed "DI was you I email not n•
it would annoy your neighbours." Mr. Coates then said
he did not think be would have it put in. -Henry Croak
a young man to the plaineire omPloy, stated that by
his ouster's orders he and the plaintiff's son carried the
frame and put it near Mr. Coatee' house. They maw Mrs.
Coates, who told them her husband was not at home,
and they MA down the frame and mune away. By Mr.
Atkinson : Could not say when the frame was finishet
[saw the rollers put M. After being very strictly
cautioned, witness stud that the rollers were put lo the
eau+. anl ta he and Pleintiff's son took lii frame home.
Ho had seen the frame slime, about a week ego. sod Wiso
about a month after be took it home.-Mr. Atkinson,
for the defenoe, elated that the frame warn ordered for •
mirtienlar purpose, and to he dieliveied by a stated time.
The jlaintiff, however, did not fulfil his agreement.-
Defendant stated that he ordered the frame three years
ago last May. before he went to the meet of the
yeomanry at Weymouth. The frame was to be done
whilst he was away. During the three years he had
heard nothing shout it, though he bad settled mover.'
necoonts. His 14 moor inquired where the window was
to be Placed, end was informed in • building where
formerly • window had been, lint was at the time
brieked op. Defendant then said that when he mote
back from Weymouth the work was not done, nor the
I &me delivered ; he saw the plaintiff and gave
him another week. He believed be had teld him
to many as 30 bills daring the three rum. He
never had any conversation with the plaintiff
shoot the from. front the time when be risme
fro m Weymouth. He then said ea tie job was net
done be would not have it &tail. The fromo aim brought
when he was absent front home, and when he mme he
hiordlletrehde it
ruberdapy"befssiorede,herhiseLengeddp
rlt nhdteilb.ffernin:mr:mb:sonwdis.lhhHehines:
(hdeettoenfdd"plt2lowtaiffs "Ire taiwors:lddrweiesll
said he would take a county court summons for that
Coatea-His Honour: Did you me Shepherd,
about 12 months ago, and was he present and heard a
oonversation between plaintiff and you f-Defendant :
I deny every word Shepherd has said. It is totally
false-Hi. Honour to plaintiff: How often during the
time stated by the defendant have you received pay.
mint for amounts due to you P-Plaiotiff : Perhaps
about sit or se.ste timee.s-Hie Hawser : He mays thirty
or mare. -Mr. Atkinson explained that several of three
payments was money borrowed, and the defendant then
said that he once lent the plaintiff £25 to meet a dis-
honoured bill at the bank.- His Honcar to the plaintiff:
Did he ever lead you L'2s to meet • dishonoured bill
drawn by you in favour of Lewin and Co. 1-Plaintiff,
after considerable hesitatioo. said, "He might have lent
me £25."- His Honour: Thetis not the question you are
asked. I most have • decided and straightforward
answer.- Plaintiff, I cannot say. I cannot remember.
-Ris Honour : Then I don't belier, a word you have
said. A man to borrow 115 to enable him to meet •
dishonoursd b It and then to say he cannot remember
the transaction l-Veriset for the defendant
john Hawkins Thomas Purim -Thls was an action
to reoov r poseemion of • cottage. The explanation
was that defendant oould not get another in the time
ion"n by the nodes, and that he had an &Misted .I.tee
rumiding with hint-Ordered to give up parmesan in
seven days Cute allowed.
John Thorns ri Thomas House.- Claim its,, for two
, 9-gallons of ale.- Plaintiff's wife appesered, and dated
that her husband purchased the ale of site Miura r
tasty, by the defeurtant's request, as he nsquired it to
the harvest -Defitotlnnt, with great vein : Your
husband and some other msn drank tbe ale in my
Lou,'. I sever hid any.-His Honour adjourned the
cave till the next wort day, and told plaintiffs wife her
husband meat appear._

Arthur Baker and Edwin Warn v. Ertanansel Legg.
—Plaintiffs are trustees of the Wesleyan Cbspel at
Mahon's. and the applieation was to reoover possession
of a cottage, which the defendant rented under them.
The only man for not complying to the patios given,
was that defeedent eould not sueond in rotting another.
—Ordered to sive tip possession in 14 days.
Joseph Strange, Matthew Hillyer.—Claim 14. ld.
—This was • singe for attendenoe and food .applied to
plaintiff's horse. It appeared that the poor animal,
which plaintiff bought for £2, had had • rough tine of
It, both parties sdroatina that for son,. days it only Mid
furze to sat, and the only acit of kindness was by the
who put it out of its misery by striking it with
a p•
ole-azs And then cutting off its bead. —His Hamer,
after bearing the can, non-nated the pinata
fiintmoeffee.--Jemee amen or. William
Itioloot.— A djoeromd. —Whim v. Illooloa. —Adjourned.
R•wkins s. J.Durant.—Tbio wee a elsirn for rent.
do—rdri.e4D'eceredflsintnedibeel:lde_hribrw:dbets.t.ouapeldirrilidi bsl:6:4.4m.doreireaoummerrii "esnada7,:rO.rd:dejanaroy.'lifo:irnfudy°i:iinar.
ril/4.. for I
ihilestor Iwo—William Goodfellow r.
Viassat.—U L

Kau—Order ler half the ei•is to be rind Ire DOI
onset dey.—Aejourned.—John Wright v. ?hone.
Mil..—C.. dismissed, defendant being in 1101014 si
I.,ish awl basing been in the %ni1..., up WI JUDO
!w.f.—Merles Harms. v. Jsmes Dibben Half ol
elohn to he paid by neat mart. —Adjourned.