The Dorset County Express and Agricultural Gazette.
Dorchester, Dorset, England, 1882-05-30 00:00:00

ILANDPOID.
00UNTY COURT.

rattsay.

Wore XL Sinfnant Tindal /Aldan's, juds-

The barna* at this omit ialitei Irma 10 -•
ca.- to /SO
p.m., daring whisk period the following NISI were heard
hoe Bomar :
JUDOMUMIT CAM.
W. H. Hardman v. li.orge C. T lac, • clerk in the
Provtacial Bank at —Clain for goods
supplied.--Ott the appliostio. of plaiatill's solicitor the
case was adjoanisd Idloezi Coact
Hearse Bargee v. Samuel Ho frlwa.L—Delasdaat meat •
tattoo unborn( 3a lopaeo pariasat, sad elbriair sere la
• mooch, which his Roomy advised 'Manta to scOeSt it
pisibbiaos to had.' ea cod.r suds or aearaiStal.
Goorge H. 04. t, Blaadford, v. L. Z. tread, harm
desist, ol Holt, new Wiaboraa —nu cam was adjonraed
to sake spades 55 10 daleadisat's away of livelihood
sad ability to pay.
There was ass application los • ladybird samaras oat
et _ the Blood:cud district.
_ .

—The following--471;;;t74 mese were next takes ;
Joseph James v. TaeophUm Adams and Philip Merles
Adams.—The pieties reeds near Haas Mary Brum, sad
the claim of Al was for loss on six pip_parebeeed of
defesieleate—From the evidence al plaintiff It mesas he
Weight ths said piss at Ws. each. On the following
Tondo, one pig died. and subssqnsery another. On
to defendants on tho matter, they reported the
ope to lb.. police who deterrotned it was seine fever, sad
the maiii.strates ordered the reasimag toar to be
aleughtered, awarding him ta for theta* hence his action
for the remaining A. and he ccesidered the pip Ware
affected whoa be bought them.—For th• demos it we.
urged tite little pip required Merest treatment and feed-
ins from that given by plalatiff, hence their dying, and
quoted please whore pme from the aims litter and drove
sire sold, sad thrived. -very well. His flotsam sugpeted
• compromise in the slur, sacs to meet the other half-
way. which was speed to, plateful aomplag gl of
defeeciaata
Quotes Caller v. Obubb.-14. Atkinson for plaintiff
ins
Yr. linaniusil ddended.—This was an action to compel
defeedeat to give up poemedon of • hour and
rented of pbsiatuff.—Defeedant pleaded be was to
give up possession, but required reammaide ems of peke.
—This formed the subject of dispute as to west should be
ormidered reasonable notios. —Der andset urged the garde.
was well stockex with fruit tress, from which he &stun.
paired amities his rent., sad asked till 10th September.—
Ai ter some little skirmishing between the solicitors
angel*. It am ultimately agreed that the 10th of August
should form the reesinablo Done to quit.
Henry Marsh. (enamor., of Miloorns St. Andrew,..
lota loyle,dosior, of me mine place—Hr. Atkinere for
pialauff ; Kr. Bninnand defended.—Claim All les . (or
• nek of bay and loose hay. purchased of plaintiff. To
this claim there was • seceff of LK ranged from 1/180 to
Iti7. Tee point at lime was we the said risk was
purchased, use defendant averring it was la IW6. which
threw it out of date; whilet plaintiff's solicitor was certain
it was not till 1873 the puronam Ira. effected_ —He called
Mr. Marsh to speak to dates, but his Manor,' was
socially at fault, first saying it was sold In 11187, then
1877. —The other witnesses were net certain as to aortal
dsta, so the lads. adj Aimed the can for the produatioe
of plaintiff's books et Use neat Court.
W. H. ILl:mord, yeoman, of Csnford, v. Charles Day,
of Ilaain.-14. W. IL Dibbea, of Witaboros, tor
plaintiff; Hr. Brennand delended.—Claim SS, value of •
rick 01 straw sold to defendant, who was the next tenant
of • Add formerly occupied by plaintiff.—The defrudent
practically admitted she centrism of purchasing the lick,
bet dossed nm liability for the whole mount, so his
lumber had shared the rte.—Plaintiff deposed to selling
the nett to the defendant, his brother not being present
at the time, and posies letter he had nor vridnie herein
dalead m .
asit ad tusd his liability, but wished nue to
fent, • etrullt 00111 to his brother for him to pop boll—
For the defence Mr. Brennand urged that the both..,
were Jotat tenaatt sad squally liable for serpent of the
rich, tans his anent wee ooly indebted to the •moult of
£l—Altar some legal trectusbalitiee In support of rib
pea, his Honour held that the defendant, having mad*
the purchase OD his own account, mud abide by ii, es he
apparently had no fulthotity from hie brother to act for
him. and roads an order for lamest of the whole claim
at CI stir mouth.
W. H. Hibbard v. G. Whita.—The *MIMI is the earas
as in tee preceding cmie, an i &loudest a build r and
small lamer, of Headley. Too same solicitors were
engaged as in the previous case —Clein iff It 1. 1. rick of
barley sus. in • tleid teken off p Marl ho itelsed mt.
Asautst tem there was • coustor-clairn iif Clri f.., work
done at Ilibberd's mdse.—Matto! stated It I rre, On
which he sold the rick of •traw, and mid ill. drlendeat
had not deeded tits claim, but always adv....tad to the
*seater-claim when any settlement we. a•k vi (or: he
dented he liability in the counter-c'elos. —Defendant
said there we. no price weed on for the etraw, and Is
misty no purchase we.made. Hs also considered be
was entitled to 30 leads of manors, promised to hist on
entering the land vacated by pi•lntiff.—Thecounter-olelin
was tor works does In connection with Handley erste
when he erected • greed stand and did other work at
Hibterd's order, who was ass of the ccernitme. Hibbard
sent for him, ordered Ma to do the work, mut super-
intended the work.—ln answer to this, Mr. Mime
argued Hibberd was merely • ocausitta• Elea, eating
onjointlY with otharti:rbo osght to be seed with hire.—
The Judge musses' 11th ardor of the County Court
roles as spilloabis to ths are sad said he meld eater the
ammo of the other ommaitsse emu Wetly for work
dose—Hi. Homan thee gave Judgasat for the *meant
claimed by Hlbbord, bit a4loumue4 the coonterefaim till
next Court to lathed the summons for the whole of the
colninitter.

Hoary Candi, retired surveyor. of Blaadford, v. Thomas
T.yior, yeoman—Chum £lO Sr. 7d. for eonversion of as
open hitch.. rano into ea soloed ons.—Yr. Brennand
for plaintiff, and 11. r. Atkinson defended.—lt sppssrod tbe
price orionally_stated for alteration of the arias woe
£4 or £4 104. When completed and the moat hill sent
de/sada/at was surpriod, bud Woad to pay as grounds of
exossive charge., sad inirtake• by thie plaintiff which
mused the ex panas.—The Judge said this was case Moo
eases where an experienced workman was nquiried to
mean this Taloa of work don., and 441i:owned the oars for
that
purges.
11.1 idla, hawks:, of Bland! ord. v. Robert Starter
innkeeper, Blandford.--Claim St., con natation on the sale
of a toe of old iron, —Defendant plaadad payload of the
some by loan of 6a by his wife to Bricile.—This Bridle
did not appear to consider partook sub. only borrow•d
that, sod would repay the good wiman, only he wanted
his 61. commimion at agreed od—Rts Honour. however,
told him the fact of Ilfra Starner Wiling him have 6a was
the woo if Blayne, had himself, as in law a husband
and wife are oes.—Verdict for defendant
John Acourt, innkeeper, Blandford. v. Prank Barnm,
road contractor, of tha moo place. —Claim Al 17a. 7d.
against which was a ono t oz. -- Kr. Brottaad :speared
plaintiff, plainu, asd Brinier Hill del ended —D esidaut
rented a house of plaintiff, and pat of the claim was for
rent due, and other items, which he practically admitted,
but put in his claim as a eel-off to the claim. This set-o 1
was in great put disputed, but after • somewhat =mitt(
wad notable bantering, his Honour acted as mediator by
giving a verdict for each claim, telling them to maks a
clean sweep of the whole affair.

sults Cast
Frank Reed, • boy of Curtaille, v. Rev. J. Lie-Warner,rector, of that villima.—Claito .40 for alleged assault.
r. Atkinson for pWntilf, and Mr. Lth-Warner oradoetted
Ma own cam—This ease emitted considerable latent; and
the Court WM crowded throughout the beariag.—From
Mr. Atkinson', opening statement it appeared to be • very
brutal asnault, but meths case programed the great body ot
thaws present entertained differest views from what had
been pe,.,,ssisiss.d previous to the hearing —The boy
t
Prank Read, about twelve years of nu &nom
that on the 10th March he was left home bY
his mother to look alter • little sick brother whilst
hie mother went into Blandford for medieins, and
about 12 o'clock defendant's groom came to the house fat
him to go to .shoot. He told him be could not leave hie
bra_ ,tisar and shortly afterwards Mr. Leis.W•roarcarn• and
dratted him out of the !wow, to the school, wisthe be took
down his trousers and birched him till blood trickled
down pie wia sad body.—ln cross-examination by the
rev. gentleman, the boy dialed every query as to hie
indecent behaviour to • village girl, and his immoral
utterances in the itched concerning the same girt—The
boy's tnstber was next examined, and she depcurid to the
severity of the thrashing. She found blood running down
his Ina, his shirt was spotted with blood and between 10
and 3s wousde from which blood was WWI. she bed
beard of the scandal throughout the willw, siwi not
know the boy was th be tlattsd for it, although Mr. Law.
Warnwr had told liar the Muvioth day that a good thrash-
ing weal I do the boy gala —Wlllthris &ma, us. boil
father. who said he wee alleviated to Mr. Fowler, stated
when he returned 'ram work t n the day of the thrashing
and found his Bk.l/1 in mob ispitiable plight, h• went to this
vicarage about it, when N. Lea-Warner said he wee
sorry for what the boy had done, as it waa each wicked.
nem and when be ('be father) threatened him with •
summons fur the smault before the macisarssee be enjoyed
him out of to. house. —Frank Hart, groom to Mr. Lee-
Weeper, deposed to going to the tor's house for his to go
to school, and he admitted taking down the 'a hawsers
Lad holding him whilst hi, master admlnistered he
birthing. ge also prodithed the birch, whisk his Hamar
observed was shoat the see Soloman would hams used
not to spoil the child NM la its freight dote It
had Ike sliPlogulooof NMI " deed matiter as • live

earfarin—ln 0/001-tlallltastion Rut said his master
erniniaed several witnesses to the boy's preessos relative
to the chugs erallult blot end slated it,.. strobes • ith
' the birch-rod was the puniehroeut lofficted.—Ms Roust
then poloted out to the defendant the course he ought to
&dont, which wes for the counsel for the pialotiff to
. addrom t, jot, an I shea himeen was
adopted, sod Mr. A." lemon addressed the jury, making ton
subetanttel Moonset. f.,r Ms client and in strong terse
denoune'ne rie. • trd..nt's right to chastise the boy In such
• brutal og b the bodge, jury, end executionerr
„Alloy to hi. miri.l • revival of oensothrp.—ffor
defame, Mr. Lee-Werner addressed the jury at wise
leasth, pleading In pletr4olll4o thst %agog/mg arester In.
decent leoptege in tee &Mod rather loan for wh.lloth place
ouseig., sOt ho wee, to a °estate ex.ent (Was manual%
riwpaneltde fit the mor sl 'retains sod good behaviour 04
the *ottathre. Re admitted It we, wrong in the eye ef
the law g deg to the boy'e house sad dragging bite to
school, hut he pieeded that in the course of • keg educe.
tloaal experience he had never piteialted a boy wader
greater plea of safety. He then referred to the beet,,.
wait unit I. the lodate's:Beat which be avowed wee
Smiler to these in use at Oxford and Cambridgps, and the
mode of odeninistarine It similar Is that is hie own
school. of Rugby and Westminster Re next pointed out
• section of the 'glue Woe Cud; which goy. to the newly.
appointed moos:ries of villein schools the pswer toroidal's,
sommary chastisement for the preserretion Ofgond
meaner, mad lea. nage Re oubmitted Rae was • van,
gesetics to decide. on; It moult whether the
of the apiculturel class in leglead were to be
restrained frsus Immorality in language on COMAINIWO
Or sot Fe did not with the jury to LIMA
of bins sa the claque:ma of the serithe but as the csaareper
of the &oboe& and csocioded hi. appeal by hoignist, that
this wee • cam ,tot up by shastelees panels to make mousy
out of their elide wicked nese. —Els Rower, in entaming
op the case to the Jury, said it wes a palatal case. Re
admitted the puslabosset was Wren, and the defendant
WM cent slaty wrong in snisi to the boy. 0.... sod
&seeing him to ochool. Theo they kid to consider ho
poeitio r es manager. and so to speak the founder of
charecoer of there children. And if their character could
not be form, d try the fora, of teen:Miss or the logos of
example, thin he presum..d must follow the force of
punishment And le • mixed wheel like this the &he
parents were to be looked to, foe if this evil wee 0.11,
checked, probably, just ea parents were expecting and
antatieg their naughters to cheer thee., the very
opponte would be tee result; aid be digited that
restraint wee necessary to keep the begs In Cheek,
trt.trbre girls needed protestant. The assault had bees
edmitted, but the portico of damages he kit sitirely Is
their hands. —The jury retired • short time, sad no return-
ing into Court gene s verdict for the plaintiff, damages be.
--Boma applause followed this esnotonmenest which we.
thetas* euppreeseed.

THE DERIY.
MCKL
ta011.1131 3
14 ran