The Dorset County Express and Agricultural Gazette.
Dorchester, Dorset, England, 1877-08-21 00:00:00

POOLE.

TIIE JICIVAL SOClNlT.—liapreyideneo has been &alit.
natel the vice of the ' bile and industrial clames ; lint
of late years the people of England' have Leen waking lip
to the impartance of joining some sort of benefit malety
by DleatlS of whielt they can secure s .thing to "fall
back upon" in their old age. The great Inlvantace, how-
ever, of most benefit awietiea is that they overbsik the
bankitt; and ace ttttt dating deprait syatents, 80 useful in
some other countries in raising the status of those who
desire by provident halal i to place them. Ives ahoy,. the
" hand-toonotttli" principle. As one of the beet .4
Moieties we may DICTILion " the NI Moat" which, in
mblition to pal ing 5 per rent. (summand interest and *
liberal bonus every live years on the money jnee,te'l.
alvances one-fourth of its capital free of interest to its
members, and the rem: . ler to those members offering
the largest an tby tender. A monthly subscriptirm
of 5.... n each certificate secnres these advantages, thus
placing the Society within reach of all. On July 31st •
member of the Society residing at Illamlford had his
certificate drawn in the ballot, which entitled the lucky
holder to in ateance of £lOO, free of interest, repayable
in equal quarteny instalments extending over Z.) years.
The member referred to has soil hip right to the advance
to another person for £3l in hard cash, and as he had
only pail £5 on his certificate he has thus obtained a
profit of £1.200 per cent, on the money invested: in other
words, he paid liv instalments £3, and °Mantel in return
4:18. On the lith of August a member of the Society
swilling in Wimborne also hot his certificate drawn in
the ballot, and has readily sold it at a cash preminin of
L:l2. This makes the sixth ballot drawn by menders in
the Wimborne agency (Mr. H. J. Wareham's). The
Biandford agents are Mr. C. Grifliths and Mr. T. Curry.
Any of our readers who may wish to Min the Saciety
can do no by applying to Mr. Charles Gent, 13, Kingland-
'dace, Longfleet, Poole, who will supply prospectuses and
full particulars.
Parry Sassicors„ Thuroday.—Before Mr, C. J. Stone.
Ahlenuan F. Styrtng, and Mr. G. U. Clutch.
THE ROBBERY 01, JIEWELLERY.—Georye Sodden, an
elderly tailor, of Morten, was charged on remand with
stealing a quantity of jewellery, etc., value about
£7 12t. 'Jd., from a bedroom at the Portsmouth Hoy Inn,
Quay, on Tuesday morning, the property of alim Theresa
Georgina Hayward, the landlord a daughter. —Prosecutrix
repeated her evidence, and prisoner, instead of asking
questions, said he did not know the things were about
him. and he had never seen but three of them.—Callf,
the mariner, also gave his evidence again, and upon being
asked if he had any question to put prisoner said "j stout
know anything about it."—The only fresh witness called
was Abel Crowfoot, who said he was working aboard the
Madeline on Tuesday morning. When he returned from
..ane,aanee," about quarter past 11 he can the het
witness being the clock and brush aboard. At dinner
time he heard of the robbery, and after communicating
with Mr. Hayward he obtained the clock and brush of the
Mat witness, lie showed the articles to Mr. Hayward,
WAREHAM. and then handed them to Supt. If —Prisoner did not
ask any questions of Crowfoot or the rep:mining witnest,
Oa Psi-lay last Mr. A. B. Holland, inspector front the Supt. Hunt.—ln reply to the usual caution from the
Home Office Burinl's Acts Department, made an inspec- Chairman, prisoner said he didn't know where the
tion of the churchyard at Wareham, the overcrowded property belonged, and he didn't know it was in his
state of which has for come time past been so complained Pocket. Ho was then committed for trial at the ensuing
against. He afterwards met a number of the inhabitants Quirt, 5ei,,,,,
at the Town Hall, when unanimous resolutions were pro- idiscainvOns BOYS.—Alfrrd Drown and Charles Welshed,
posed, seconded, and carried expreming an opinion that • aged respectively eight and ten years, were sutunp.ned for
new burial ground, and burial board to manage it, was throwing stones in the street, at Perry llarden,on Sunday,
very necessary. Under advice of the inspector vestry to the annoyance and danger of pasaere.by.—The defend
-
meetings have been convened in the three Waaeham ants, it seems, smashed two of the windows at the
parishes for the purpose of deciding about the exPadienel National Schools, but they were not charged with this.
of electing a burial taaarcl. Stone-throwing by buys has become a great nuisance in
—a-- the borough, and the magistrates remaiked that some-
WIMBOENB, thing must be done to put a atop to it, but as the
Pgrry SESSIONS, Friday.— Before Mr. C. J. Parke, and defendants had already been punished by their parents,
the Rev. G. V. Garland. and the father of one and mother of the other WAS ill, the
William Burr, • labourer, of Canatitution-hill, was sum- Benah dismiteed the charge, and remitted the costs (SIL)
mooed for assaulting Robert Percy, of the same place, on upon the tors promising not to offend again.
the Bank Holiday. After hearing what the complainant A COWARDLY I'aLLOW. William Sweriant a lalmurer,
and • witness had to say the Chairman characterised the was summoned for cruelly beating and ill-treating ,eat
case as a trumpery one, which ought never to have been belonging to Richard Will., on the previous day.—Mrs.
brought into Court, nod fined defendant Is. only, costs Wills proved that about one o'clock on the previous day
remitted. defendant knocked down the cat with a poker, and in-
MASTER AND SERV/ClT.—brad Robins, labourer, of dieted such injuries upon the pair animal that it died
Sturminster Marshall. was summoned under the 12m. just before six o'clock that morning, after suffering very
ployer's and Workmen's Act, by Mr. William Martin, great pain. The only reason she could think of for the
fi,erner. of Moor Court, Storminster Marshall, who cruel act was that they had had a dispute snout the
matimmi "to amount advanced defendant on account of ownership of a portion of the yard at their houses.—
harvest !none/. 41, and to damages sustained by reason Defendant emphatically denied striking the cat, tint the
of defendant 1-msiing j,laintiff'a employ, not giving proper complainant and a young woman named Frances Hayes
notice, 41."—Mr. W. H. AU:ins-in, of Blandford, appeared corroborated Mrs. Wills as to the state of the poor brute.
for defendant —fdr. Martin said he engaged defendant —The magistrates inflicted a fine of only 21. dd. and costs,
about six weeks or two months ago, and he was on day his. ado and allowed defendant till Saturday for payment.
work at first, then turnip hoeing, and afterwards harvest • A couple of other cases were adjourned for a week in
ing. All the other men asked for harvest drink money, consequence of Mr. H. T. Trevanion, who was concerned
and said they wanted a sovereign. Defendant said he in them, being occupied at the County Court in the
wanted the same as the rest. Ile gave John Singleton • adjoining Council c hamber.
a cheque to pay each man a sovereign. He wrote down Cotarcr Conn, ThuradaY.—Bef ore Judge Lefroy.—This
la his pocket-book that LI had been paid to defendant for WaR his Honour's last sitting previous to the long vacation,
hat-seat money, This was on a Friday, and on the follow. and as it clashed with the Borough Petty Sessions it was
, lug Elanda..pi.ay istor4izdtaid.diefeniniodanit cattponkermuutohohuirinaant.rd
toiff.erd...edHe 113:1.chiatigield in thethCetzo
turiac.ilso.ckuititidmheanrd ign:stieeritd.tooritzthoer
thilluvile.ddeb
faivi
.;] ,
to give him Lad: taa :overman, as he wanted to leave, which was occupied by the magistrates-
recelved
hich
wbd
was
lle ref snail to tom the nomy taut), and told him he had Tribbett and Mate v. lloghec—This action woo lonnalit
hired him for the harvest. berandagr. did not return to to recover .C. 3 ss. for advertising in the Bourarevorth
his work, and he had been obliged to hire a ; dlarmaker Viaitord Directory, the defendant being manager of the
in his place. If he could not have got any.ea tr. fill Civil Service Wine Association. The amount claimed,
defendant's place six men would have been hindered. with costs of summons, was paid by post-office order this
Defendant had not finished his turnip hoeing. —Crow morniga.—Mr. Trevanion, who appeared for the plaintbf,
examined by Mr. Atkinson: He made no regular agree. said he had had to bring a witnem from Bournemouth and
ment with the defendant He did not know what he a clerk from the plaintiffs' Pooleoltae, besides the plaintiff
owed defendant for turnip hoeing, as the ground had not he asked for full costs. The defendant had gis en a great
been measured. Defendant formerly worked on the line, deal of trouble by disputing hit liability till the last
and be had gone back again.—Mr. Atkinson said he was moment—The Judge allowed all the expen.ses, including
instructed that there was no agreement between the the solicitor's charge.
parties, sad that the Li was advanced on account of Rogers v. Sogers.—Mr. It. T. Trevanion appeared for
turnip haeing. He conrenied that there was no contract the plaintiff. and Mr. R. N. Howard, of Weymouth for
under which plaintiff could ree...vert, but the magistrates the defendant. The plaintiff claimed Ell le 6.1.. balance
were of opinion that there was an implied contract, and of account due from his brother, the defendant, who
ordered defendant to repay the sovereign, besides 2s. el, admitted owing ES its. 61., but claimed 416 tis. 61.
damages and as. ltd. expenses. - Ore of the items claimed by the plaintiff was
ORARORS OF WORRYING SHIM,. —Andre.- Hatiall, £l, the value of a hone. He said the defend-
labourer. of Woodlands, WY summoned for allowing his ant had kept a pony belonging ti him, and he
dog to bite, worry, and injure a sheep belonging to Mr. (defendant) told hint ii he would give him the pony and
Adam Revel, of West Parley, on the 27th of July, and Li 1.3 he would bring him a home. Tb,a was agreed to, and
darnagm were claimed.—Defendant was represented by the defendant, when he receive,i the mcncr, said if he
his sister.—Mr. Revel stated that Mr. Hatchard's eon paid it back and did not charge anything for geeping the
came to him on horseback on the 27th of July and told pony the horse would belong to him. He had not paid
him that a man down in the common with a dog had witness anything.—The cane was very complicated, and
killed one of his sheep. He went to the common and eventually both parties named to refer all matters of
found defendant had got the sheep and the head difference to Mr. A. A. Allen.
cut off, sod tut was taking out the insi e. He asked Inas and Son v. Budden.—The plaintiffs, who carry on
defendant whet ka had been up to, and he said his dog had business at Ringwood, claimed 1.6 from the defendant
killed a sheep, but he d:d not know whose it sena He for a load of artificial manure sold on the 15th of July,
told him he had • good testae to take possession of the 1f176. Mr. Trevanion was for the plaintiff, and Mr.
sheep, if his ilea had killed it. Defender.: said it wag a Robinson, of Bournemouth, for the defendant, who
bad job, and he nupposed he must pay for it: hs hcra. he entirely denied owing the money. Mr. Ingo said William
would not be too hard upon him. He told defensflant his Hampton dehvered the manure, and about a year after'
should te him unless he paid for the sheep and Was.. 4 when witness mate one of several APPlications to
killed the dog, and he promised to kill the dog as soon as the ffefar.dan. for payment, the latter said that he was
he got home, and to pay for the sheep the following morn. not going to hie the manure and that he had put it in
hog. Defendant failed to do so. He valued the Wimp at some one else's tiara —lfampran was called, bat his
£l. memory did not appear very clear ou the. subject—The
Another charge against defendant of allowing big dog, defendant and his son gave evidence to prove that no
on the moue day. to worry a sheep belonging to Mr. erder was given and no delivery made—the inference
Stephen Orman, of Barton, was them gone into.—James being that the wrong man was sued.—The plamtiff was
Osman said he kept the railway gate atMortan Common. nonanited-
He saw some shoe; lying on the cart track through the Beads v. whitue.—The plaintiff, who is supervisor of
common on the Nth gf Jttly. Defendant came excise, residing at Punk, claimed £3 1.5.... 6-1. from the
through the gate accompanied by a doe, bitch, , defendant, a butcher carrying on business at Wareham.—
and puppy. Defendant had a sewer on ht. i Mr. Trevaniun appeared for the plaintiff, and Mr. lloward
back, and naked him if he would buy r.,,qp I, for the defendant--Me. Trevanion said on the 7th of
of it. lie told him he did not deal in such Muff. Dela& . • ens the plaintiff had RR interview with the defendant in
Es, sad to paid 4.. fac breaking it in ; in addition to this
dent aid his dog had killed the sheep, upon which be refeeneiteio a horse. The plaintiff had a horse which cost
told hint it would kill some more if he did not look oat
Defeadand noneimed talking till a train was doe, and than the agreement was thin the piasntiff should give
.4.5 for
cud ma Jilt Our he maw the d 2 worrying 1 equality of exchange, making the total amount £‘l. In
dilhoimsd mat and Sand op
1
au ..14 defendant farther said that the mare could not be made
it an Us Ismisadlett it. As soar arblia 0
badangeed to kick, and that alter the plaintiff had had her a weak