The Dorset County Express and Agricultural Gazette.
Dorchester, Dorset, England, 1867-07-23 00:00:00

THE DORSET COUNTY EXPRESS AND AGRICULTURAL GAZETTE, TUESDAY, JULY 23, 1867.

the aseoad, Insley Pinnook B.RA. made some fine
shots with four threes and two twos. In the
second inninp of the Weymouthians, who pore
evidently put on their metal (their opponent. having
left 50 to beat), some good batting was exhibited: Mr.
Robinson scoring 12, including two good threw Mr.
G. Dominy, who seemed quite at home with the willow,
sooting 24 with some of the finest hits during the play,
inclusive of two threes and four twee. The longstop
for Dorchester mui es traordinardy quick. The Dorchester
team had some good bowlers, and altogether the field-
ing on both rides was good. At the conclusion a desire
was expressed by the Dorchester eleven to have the
pl wenn of meeting the Weymouth eleven on the
ground of the former to again compete for the honour
of being victorious. The following are the total scores.
Weymouth, let inWflp3o ; second innings, 50 ; total,
70. Dorchester, Ist innings, 28 ; 2nd innings, 41,
total, 69.

BOROUGH POLICE.

- ----
MONDAY.—Before J. hyling and B. Cotter.ll,
&qrs.
James Proctor, private 80th regiment, was than*
with breakinta pane of gLtes at the Bear hotel, the
property of Wm. Morgan, and valued at ir. 6d.
illisabeth Boller deputed that sips was • barmaid at the
Blur hotel, in Si. Thootarrastreet, Weymouth.
She as the prisoner on Saturday. He same into the
bar about quarter past eleven with some other soldiers
end he then broke a quart jag, Wilson did not see
him break the jug, but board the imp break, and then
law the prisoner with the pieces in his hand.—Witnem
then asked him for expeacus for the jes. He refused,
and commenced fighting with the other withers, when
they where turned out by the ostler. After he was
turned oat, the prisoner broke through theater window
In the front door by forcing his head and arms through.
Prisoner had nothing to ask the witness, and pleaded
drunkenness. A sergeant of prisoner's company was
present, wbo said prisoner bore • good character in the
regiment in every other respect beside that of
drunkeness. Sentenced to one month's bard labour.
Mark Balobin, with R. Y.& marked on • blue Oureasy,
was charged with stealing a silver watch and a gold
chain, from the person of Edward Con, valued at 88.
—Prosecutor (a blaoksiaith) deposed that yesterday
morning he was sitting in one of the chairs on the
Esplanade, when the pHiposu sun sod set down by the
side of him. He was a detour. They had some con-
versation abut shipping, white another man mune
and spoke to the prisoner, and ergot away, and witness
then missed his watch. He went after this other men
and asked him if be had got his watch, and he replied
he had not, Witness then went beck and took hold of
the prisoner and asked him if be had taken it, and be
also rid he had not—Watch produeed by P.C. Bartlett,
and identified by witness, who said that he then gave
prisoner in obarge.—P.C. Bartlett, deposed, that yester-
day morning at 1.90 be was on duty, and saw the
prison sit &mu by the side of the prosecutor. The con-
atable
then gave corroborative evidence, end said he
took prisoner into cuttody. On being asked, prisoner
denied taking tie watch. Witness than took him to
the station, and on searching him found the watch and
chain produced,—Prisoner pleaded guilty, and in ex.
Urination of his mime pleaded that the premeditator was
asleep, and the watt* was hanging from his clothes,
and took the watch, saying to the propitiator, "Come on
old ship, 'don't sleep here." He had left the yacht
Arladney in Portland roads, and was bound to South-
ampton, to join the War-hawk. He knew be had duet
wrong and was very sorry.—&entoneed to three months'
hard labour.

-11ki—v;ard Borman and Ann Bartlett was &barged with
draping in • shed in Spring-lad, and having no visible
means of snheistenoe.—P.C. Kush deposed that he
found the two prisocers this morning about two o'clock
sleeping in an open shed, in a field belonging to Mr.
John Groves, at the bottom of Spring Gardena. They
weld not give an account of Usentealves.—Priaceser
Holman said be bad been about in Weydouth for years.
He was on his way to the Brad fishing and the female
prisoner went with him on the way.—Disiebarged.
Mary Vincent and Lonsia Jacket, two not very tidy
looking girls, werecharged with vraney. About 3
o'eleen on Monday morning the prEners were found
by PM. Short, sleeping in a shed on the Rodwell Road,
In • field occupied Mr. P. Roberts. Magid Vincent
wan also e with stealing a dress, the
property of Henry William RendalL Mrs. Randall, the
wife of prosecutor deposed that prisoner had been work.
lug for her at her home. She mired •
dress on Wednesday morning. The prisoner had been
to work for her on the Tuesday previous. Witted had
promised to let prisoner have the dress to wear out with
the children but was not to take it home. Ira con-
sequence of the prisoner stopping out all Monday night,
witness had told her she would not give ber the dress
nor allow her to come to her house any more. On Tuesday
the prisoner put on the dram, left her rags behind,
and again stayed out all night. Prisoner had no
right to wee.% the dress greed when out with the
children. —Mr. Randall seld the only otafeet he had in
bringing the on.. before the Bench, wag to see if some-
thing could he done to reclaim her.—ln reply to
quedions from the Bend, it was shown that the prisoner
was too old for admission to a reformatory.—? C.
Short proved the apprehension of the prisoners who '
then had the dress oo.—Both the juveniles were then
committed for a month as vagrants, and the prisoner
Vincent to another month's hard labour on the charge
of stealing the drug.

WIMBORNB

MAME, or lamina—The following trandars of
Rosaries were made by the Wimborne Bench on Friday
but The George Inn. Wbaborne, from Elleabeth
Dibben to Joseph Hinds. "he Fox and Hounds, Ham-
c, from Elisabeth Ware to Mary Ware. The
Horse, flturminsten Marshall, from Barbara
Beech to William Oliver.

ftexuvieu Cirrus salvos:Fr • Login...At the
petty 211.1601111, last Friday (before C. J Parke, En, the
Hon. W. B. Portman, ii.r., Lientenant-Colonel Paget,
and Revd.. .1. H. Arun end Carr John Glyo),
Thomas Dowding, of Lytchel, was charged with
removing two cows and on calf from Berl Regis to
Lytobet, on the Bth instant. It appeared that defend•
dant had really need old poxes, granted him some
tiros sines, and altered the data. The Ranch fined him
10e. each animal, and costa, Mr. Atkinson appeared
for defendant.—John Ridout, of Poole, butcher, was
flood Cl Its., including nets, for b:each of cattle orders,
by causing two sows mid one calf to be removed from
Here Regis to Ltchaa.
onDruLows. FarrlVal.—The Orldfellows' of Wino.
borne made a praiseworthy effort to be jolly last
Tuesday, under the meet adverse circumstances of wind
and weather, the occasion being a demonstration by the
loft' lodges "Benevolent" and "Hope Evermore"
united. But the elemental strife which raged through-
out the day rendered the meeting a failure. However,
certain of the brethren formed a procession,in which
was displayed the replin of the Poole district, and
and batmen of the Wuuborne, Poole, and Dorchester
liazand led by the lit Hints Engineers' hand, they
to the Minster, where prayers were read by the
Rev. Prebendary Onalow, and the sermon preached by
the Rev. H. Good, from Genesis xlii. 0 Alt,, service
the proems:* was reformed, and they porrunbulatad
the streets, said a deluge of min. The dinner took
place at the Town-hall (the marquee being impractica-
ble on amount of the min), but it was not large enough
to accommodate the party. Lord Ashley presided,
supported by the it.,. H. Good, Mr. H. Webb, Mr. C.
R. -Rows, Mr. Arthur Whitehead, Mr. Whitehesd
Dr. Manning, Cll. Bra Western, mr. Beyna.,
to. The usual loyal and patriotic toasts were duly
Errand honoured ; with the navy the name of the
Good, and with the volunteers the names of
Hon. Surgeon Rowe of the Dorset Battalion. and Lien
Matthew Webb of the 4th Rants Artillery, were
amornated. "lire healths of the Bishop and Ono of
the Diocese" was given from the chair, and responded
to by the Rev. H. Good. The Chairman next gave
" Success and prcspsrity to the Manchester Unity of
Oddiellows," Ut. Et society of which they formed.
branch, and, in d so, he made • few remarks on the
advantages of the . Mr. Western, C.&, responded,
and spoke at some length touching the solvency of the
society, with a view to snswering (ee it seemed to us),
the question recently rand by 0. W. Ferrer, Req.
Mr. Western sap they have now got such gone of pay-
ment as have been acknowledged by the beat actuaries
in the land to be safe and prudent for them to act upon.
That is a very satisfactory statement, but it doss not
touch, as we conceive, the point raised by Mr. Ferrer,
who merely indicated that the males of payment given
in the rules were not cerNisd by an actuary to be suffi-
cient for safety, and suggested that such a certificate
was of the greatest importance, and if sdded would be
of the utmost service to the Order. Mr. Rowe briefly
proposed "Success to the Poole District," which was
warmly received. C.S. Bra Western also responded to
this toast, in doing which be said last year the district
numbered 9,097 members, being an lacrosse over the
previous year of 218. On the hat January, 19191, the
capital of the lodges amounted to £13,729 17e. 2d., and
on the corresponding date this year it had increased to
215.844 Ti. That, e thought, was an increase sul-
y friendly society in exiatenoe--(cheen).
reilli44 try an
Bro. ET. Low next gave "The health of the
Chairman," which was lustily responded to. The
Chairman, in responding, observed that he was an Odd.
fellow, and he was road, an honorary member of the
lodge at Swindon aotne years ego, • fact which gave him
an additional interest in their welfare-ond cheers).
This concluded the speeches. Subsequently there was
dancing at the Ton-hall sad Oddießows-hall, and in
Us. evening a pyrotechnic display in the cricket field.

of the prisat That °harsh might have hold so;
but the roatter is changed when the member
of the Anglican Church hold precisely tbe same views.
There ire those, in the church to whir I belong,
who held these views, and they *errs themselves
with is.. distinctness, bat it tome. is the end to
precisely the same thing—the veritable, oerporeal
presumes of the Lord Jesus in the aserareent. At
the bead of this wheel, stand such names as Dr. Paley,
and Dr. Littleidale. These men make no secret of
their real views in this matter. There is another
party who will net adopt the explicit language of
the head party, but who really wept the rme
doctrines, though with • more uncertain and
equivocal phraseology, They wish to begin with the
thin end of the wedge sod to drive it in gradually. To
establish their position they have ransacked all the
records of the church, from the Reforreation downwards
to get tbe advantage of Protestant truth itself on their
aide. Nay, they have even used the mime of Martin
Lather itself. Now, I love the name of Martin Lather.
By hie bold sad uncompromising stand for God's truth
he shook the Papacy to its foundation' and planted the
germ of that Protestantism which is now the glory of
England, and which is again being careered. That
Luther should bold 000subrantiation were nothing to
be wondered at. Nursed in the bosom of the Papacy, it
would have been nothing short of • moral =lmola for
or any ogle ehe circumstanced as he WY, to shake
himself free of every vestige of error. He was just
emerging from darker', and it were nothing wonderful
if some of the old shreds of error struck to him. Bat
we are not to accept the 'errors of any man, not even
of Martin Luther. Who is Martin Luther? Who is
Paul? But those by whom ye believed. The gustiest
is what does the Bible teach I We shall discuss this
Matter simply on scriptural grounds. When tie
Lord instituted the supper be took the bread and
blessed it, and the cup and etre thanks, and she'
blessing them he said, 'This is my body, this is my
blood." With more or less variation, this is the
repreentation which is made by the other evangelists
and by St. Paul in I Con xi.. 23,.42. 25. When ois
Lord said, "this lousy body," "this le is my blood," it
Is insisted that these material elements became thener
forth his veritible body and blood; his real corporeal
presence. In other words consequent ea sonateratioa
there was the real presence as insisted on by the
church of Rome, and by many Of our church. We
this so OT was it not ? If it were then there is an sod to
the matter. And tilt were so I would never enter my
pulpit again. la this ere the ritualist' are all right
and we are all errs& But let us brine this matter to
the teet.-1. If we hedge on taking these words
if we refuse • figurative and spiritual meaning, la
this ease they prove too much. Let us see how thee:lls
stands with regard to the words describing the Lord's
Sapper itself, If, when Christ said, "This is my body"
he meant that the bread was really and truly his fieeh,
on the same ground when he says this cup is the New
Testament, we must insist that the cap is really and
truly the New Testament ; and tbat the cup further is His
blood. But is not the very supposition erroneous? And
yet this style of interpretation, if true in one instance,
must be &reefed in all? Who does not tee then that •
literal interpretation in this passage is quite inadmissable
and that only a figurative and spiritual one can be
✓esisted • And why need this be objected ?
Is ar 'Christ's language in many i... 1
in peeler accord with this supposition;m l;
, the vine, ye are the brunches. " Bet Jeans
never could mean that he wee the vine
tiredly, and that his disciples were branches literally;
but just as the common life flows from the stem
through the branches, and imparts vitality to the whole,
so believers, in virtue of their union with the Saviour—
derive • common life from him ; his life circulates
through them, and without him they are simply lifeless;
thus viewed the similitude is simple and beautiful. And
so when Jesus speaks of our eatins his flesh and drinking
his blood, he speaks of this spiritual ace "The desk
proateth &tithing t the words I spews unto you they
are spirit and they are life." Unless, therefore, we
receive ()brisk thus spiritually by faith; unless we look
upon him sib. who gave himself for us; yielded up his
body to the death; unless we socept him as thus bearing
away all our sins, and live upon him as such, we ma
hays no life in u. We are thus to eat spiritually, rist
corporeally, Christ's body, and thus live. But in this
fact there is no transubstantiation, or columbetantiation,
whatever name may be employed to demerits Si—
an such terms really describing one and the some
thing. But if it be asked, how are we to eat the
body of the Lord? we have an answer In Paul's
Epistle to the Bosuns, Bth chapter. There it is
clearly seen that it is not with the tongue, not with
the teeth; not as received from • priest or off an
altar, but with the heart, the affection, for with the
heart man believeth unto righteouness," he, It is the
affection that is to go out in Christ, and live on him.
In this mum nothing so deer, nothing so sweet to the
living Cluistain than the body and blood of Jesus. We
partake of them in the spiritual sense continually.
This, also, I believe to be the teaching of the Church of
England in this matter. Let me repeat it, then, that the
real presence as insisted on by the ftomanists or
Ritualists is not in the Lord's supper; not in the hands
of the priests ; not on the altar ; the real presence is in
the heart of those who partake by faith of the outward
elements which remain unchanged. This is the point
on which the Reformers of our church insisted, mil
rather than forego, wenttothe stake. This is the point,
moreover, which their euelnies were most envious for
them to concede, but which they insisted on refusing ;
to have conceded this one point would have earned
for them exemption from almost all others. Atoll
events, this was the point on which their trial rested,
and for which they finally suffered death. [Here the rev
racism= quoted • testimoey from A rebbishop Creamer,
borne by him on the very day on which he was put to
death.] Here the Archbishop most unequivocably
rejects the papistical doctrine of the real pressor. He
says expressly, that Christ is not corporeally or really
p••••••• iv% lorlo L. ia• lonomon, Fut in
them that worthily eat and drink he is spiritually
present. See the tremendous issues of this doctrine, if
granted! Why, • poor, sinful, Isllible creature like
yourself is the real porsesor of eternal life, can mum.
future it, and give it, as he pleases, and to whom. Can
in believe that God Almighty has invested any human
being with such powers? Our ch.:eche. are martyr
churches, but the very errors which eon them their
best lives are sgain being revived, and advocates are no.
blushingly asking England's adherence to them. Is
England to grant it? that is the question. If we are
true to our peat history, to God's truth, to the gospel,
we shall not. Nay, if we would be worthy of on: fore-
fathers, we mast heard all for the truth's sake. The
devil is at the bottom of all this. II is a master stroke
of policy on his part, the object is to hide the stonemeat.
He knows that Jesus made an oblation focus ; a sacrifice
which ended all other sacrifices, which wrought out an
everlasting righteousness unto all those who believe.
Once let this greet truth go, and the whole arch falls
Into ruins—the salvation of men's souls becomes int.
peedble. This the devil knows, and go he derives men
with the strong delusion. With the simple, yet sublime
statements of the Bible in the truth of Christ's saarifiee,
what a power haa • minister? Why, I feel I tan staad
In my pulpit and never tire of telling men of the love of
Jeans if his blood is fitted to cleanse from sin, that he
has done all, that nothing further Deeds be added to it
by the sinner. Oh I no, lays the Ritualist, Christ rand
be offered again; He must be sairifieed on ths altar
again. We must make security secure. See how all this
robs God? The very glued upon which I can go to
God is that of the somplete atonement of Jesus—not
offered on • table, by an earthly priest, not on an
alter, but on the gross, where sin was fatly expiated.
Ye are coupler in him. My beloved friends, I have
not overrated the danger. I shall now read you • few
extract" from an address of Dr. Peaty who in this
matter is our greet enemy. The extracts WS all
bear* on the distinctive doctrines for which that
dietlnguished Churchman contends, and lathe plan of
I adieu whir be sewer to his followera se a plan of
gradual and silent initiation of these doctrines into the
minds of the people. During • loom and at the Wee
time else and judicious address, the attention of the
, people remained tuiflaggisg, and the frequent serer
sons of approval, evidently testified to their apprecia-
tion of the points at issue, and their rose of the
solemn truths at stake. The meeting was then
addressed by the Rev. P. Kant, the deputation. The
proceedings terminated by • hearty vote of thanks by
the chairman to the depetation, and Mr. Templer.
The meeting was one of the most eacesed4 ever bald
in Beaminster in connexion with the British and
foreign Bible Society.

Imperial Iparltament.
Romig 07 LORDS.

MOWDAY.—The Royal went was even by *amnia-
lion to • large number of Bilk—ms Earl of irnarrott
leered for i return of the regiments that had been in
New Zealand aims 1885, and the dates of their
embarkation, and after a few remark* from immoral noble
lords the motion was agreed to. Som• bills were for.
warded a gags.

Tuggiur.—The Reform Bill wu read a first time.
The Burl of Derby said that he proposed to take the
mond reidhsg the following Monday, and if the debate
terminated that night ht Would to the committee for
the following Friday. Earl Grey deprecated baste in
disguising • question of sub importinee, although be
WSS not aware el any opposition to the Bill, and
suggested that the oommittee be fixed for Monday week,
to which the Eszi of Derby amented. The Transubstan-
tiation, he., Declaration Bill, was read • third time and
passed.

Tsonspi.v.—The Trades Matta Commleiden got
Ititension Bill wee rmd a second time. The Earl of
Shaftesbury moved the mooed reading of the A -
cultural Employment Bill, and Mated that it provided
that no child under eight ehonld be employed in Krt.
cultural Work. Olds he said under 13 pure of age
were not only physically unfit for the bard work of the
fields, imposed to all the vie:baited.' of weather het
such employment had • demoralising effect opoe Awn,
and also deprived them of that knowledge of domestic
duties which was absolutely essential to their well•being.
It had been the fashion. observed the noble lord, to
311kof the agricultural Labourer u destitute of
nowledge, and as • mere boor, but it wonld be found
that he 'did kis duty in a most eggcup* manner,
and sometimmi brought to bear upon his work an
Maga of Ingenuity, ituleMont, and eilwelatioo, of
which a skilled mechanic might be proud. What was
now wanted was some system by which the children of
the orkoaireeni wwwwsnity might receive • good sound
education, which would qualify them for their part in
life, not only as Clirisdau, but St fencimitineng_.
(beer, hear). The Earl of Stradbrook was anxious to
say that so far as Suffolk was immersed they ere not
unprepared to earry out the proposed system. Lord
Lyveu-u, whilst admitting that the principle of the Bill ,
weal mound one, could not help regarding its details as ,
being
_eoesewhat ill-considered, lie thought that the
proddon that under no ciretunttureee should girls
under 13 years of age be employed in the field wee too
grt. If they were not employed In the open
artwould, in all Probabilitf, be confined in some
111-vestuatu cottages. It was right to provide against
boys of a tender age being over-worked or worked Aunt
but tt was idle to think with the present deficiency oi
agrisaltural Women such boys would not be employed
at all. Again, to provide that boys should only be
=ln the 0411111 01 their being nducktnd in
with bye-laws to be framed by indices if the
peace seemed to be pressing the principle too fez. They
meld not parry out ouch a provin without compulsory
eduation, or without imposing upon parents the
necessity of sending their children to @chords of which
they disapproved for the Nike of procuring them employ.
meat Earl of Kimberley supporigi ti. Bak and

after a tow words from the Bari of Shaftesbury, who
said he simply wished their lordships to affirm the
principle of the Bill, end did not intend to push It
further this seseko, the Ball wee reed • mooed Lima
- - -

FIWAY.—In reference to Lord Stratford de Redaliffe's
motion for in eddrem to her Ilejenti ex_Premdre ot
condolence upon the death of the Emperor Koziolßea,
end eoudennuation of the sot bl._Valigt " bin bee°

effeeted, Lord Derby thought with an expression of
opinion unnecessary, and asked Lord Stretford to with-
djaw his motion, which Lord Stratford did. Lord Resell
dffea attention to 80016 &basics remarks recently
made by Mr. Purcell, aAi pendary maffistrat• JUllaida•
in reference to Lord Chief Jostle, Coekbarn's-cibarge on
the late trial of General ?Ideal, and said the language
was most indecorous on the part of One about to ffll
the offline of district judge. The Duke of Buckingham
said that, in °ono rinence of Mr. Purcell's want of
decorum, his appointment had been cancelled. Lord
Melville observed that the Lord Chief Justice's charge
was both partial and unjust. The Lord Cbaneellor,
after strongly condemning Mr. Pureell's mod=
asserted that the charge of the Chief Jostles a
able exposition of law. The matter dropped; sad
a:tor several Bills were advanced a stage, the House
• Ijourned.

"waruhtm" were given up became they VON 110 i bend
upon saientile date, end goad not be relied is. The
subject of the Mermaid, brought forward by Mr.
Heedlam, gave rim to along diesemlen. Hr. Beadle=
wanted an address to bar Malady. afsmidthil Ott oPisito
of the Howe in favour of ibe claims for compenathissa
against the Spanlsh GOVIITS1118111; but Lord smoky gave
Yll7 good mamas against Neel • soma. The dillionity of
the ease, be remarked, is that these is saking in inter-
national law to Gout* the Spanish Government to refer
the matter to abdication, so Lkat we are id% with two
aternatives—tosnapeed diplomatic relatimas or go to wee.
The Ira would be • very inadequate remedy, end the
meowd would not be supported by pails epistles either
ahead or a Ilona. We should earleibly ae6 lake mush
• mem had we • Finesse of the bled smiled a larp
Power, sad it woad sot be creditable to ant differently
towards • mall is.. A greet deal was mid by Noma
members about the "dignified attilmle of the sountry,"
end No forth; but the make WM ultimately withdrawn.
—Hr. H. B. Sheridan masplataed of the manner in
which the Maas had bees diaributsd for the date
entemisinment to be given to the Sultan by the Indian
Government. He submitted that the two Howes of
Parliament ought to have been limited, and moved for •
list of the persons who had been invited.—Mr. Palma
Mdagainst the oast of mat 01111111idallielkill being
is;letdout of the taus of India—Mr. (liay eppeW
the mottoes. —The House was steered for • dieWoa, I.
the motion was segetived without.