The Dorset County Express and Agricultural Gazette.
Dorchester, Dorset, England, 1878-06-18 00:00:00

WINBORIX_

--
COCTY Corer, Toeeday.—Before Mr. T. E. P. Lefroy,
Jude*.
Narteret Stowe v. Jahn Cook, both of Winiborne—A
claim of las for wee., of which defendant paid 74 into
Court and disputed the balance. The ewe came before
the Court two months since, when hie Honour gave judg-
ment for the amount paid into Court but sitar the defen•
dent had left he altered thio to • verdict for the amount
claimed. Defendant objected to pay, and the case again
came on for hearing. Mr. H. T. Travenion now appeared
for the plointiff. having been engaged by • gentleman in
Court —The plaintiff. an intelligent little girl, said she
catered the defendant's service on the 13th of August, the
agieesnent being that she was to have Is, a week for a
mouth, rind if the suited the sages were to be risen She
received 124 weirs in Novemler, and left an the 13th of
February, when defendant refused to pay her the balance
of les due for testes miles+ she did the whole of the work
of the house. She was obliged to fetch a policeman to get
her box. Her mother gsve defendant six weeks' notice
before she left —Defendant swore that she let the girl
have se. on • Sunday morning to pay her dressmaker.
She shin said she hired the girl by the month,
and not by the week, and the amount she had d into
Court was all she owed the girl. n. ons were
posiUvely dented by both the girl and hei mother who
gave corroborative eveidenoe.—Jane teeny, the woman
who nada lbe errs dress, also proved that the mother
paid la for her work on • Saturday night—Defendant
called her washerwoman, who only knew something her
mistrew bad told her, and to her succeeded the defendant,
who swore that he lent his wife Si. on • Sunday morning
to make up EH., and that he saw her hand it to the girl.—
A railway guard who lodged with defendant waa neat
called to prove that his landlady asked him to chanse
laalf.esovirreign on the Sunday morning in question but
be said he remembersd nothing whatever of such an
occurrence. After • bearing which lasted for threw
quarters of an hour, during nearly the whole of which
time Mrs. Cook's tongue was in 1110L1013, his Honour gave
inclement for plaintiff for 1111
William Seabrook v. Otorg4 Hearley, both of Winthornis.
—A claim of lor datums to • wall—Mr H W Dibben
wowed for plaintiff; Mr H T Trevanion for defendant
Te parties own adjoining property, and both claim the
wall in question. An amicable oettleuteut was arrived at
by the defendant siring up all claim to the wall, and the
plaintiff waiving hie Seim for the d
Joupk Tricker, • dealer, Ver=e;. Mary Blades.
widow, of the wine place—A claim of Al 1. &.1 demagog
sustained through the alleged breach of warranty of a cow
with calf-11y F. H. Tanner appeared for the defendant,
—The cow in question turned out • kicker, and the point
at USW was whether the aminual was werranted quiet or
net —After hearing four witnesses' the judge decided that
there was no warranty and save • verdict for defendent
but without ewa.

Joka V Moe. carpenter, of Wimborne. v. Maria' Paw
builder. of the same piece. —A claim of Le 135., for work
and material, Mr. H. T. Trevanion appeared for defend.
ant.—Plitotiff ...id he made 14 doors for defendant. at
ns. 64. each. He delivered them some mnotha ago, and
they had been used. He weed to make 24 doors, but as
be could not maks them in tone defendant told him he
woild not receive the remainder if he made them.
Cror-examtned by Kr. Trevaniou: He knew he had to
DniA the doors by lb. 10th of March. He did not under-
take hi make the 21 doors in a month—yin, by the 26th
of Febniary. Defendant objected to pay for the do.",
but he offered to deposit the whole of the money for the:
24 with Mr. Dowding if he would make the remainder of
the doors. He was willing to make the remainder if
defendant paid him on account. He did not arm to
deliver the whole 24 before he received any money. H.
delivered the last of the 11 doors on the flud of March.—
Defendant amid plaintiff bad done • considerable quantity
If work for him, but be wee so irregular he discharged
him. Plaintiff afterwards asked him for soine work to
it heron and he engaged hint to make 24 doom tor four
homes in was building for Deputy Chief.Coostable
Hammond. Plaintiff agreed to make the doors at 9s. 121.
each, and said he would mnke them in a fortnight, but
he told him he would allow him • month. In COLISO•
queues of plaintiff not carrying out his agreement he had
to Purchase ready-ruade door*, which had to be altered.
I. the size woo an unusual one, and he had sustained
&manta He was also liable to • penalty of LS for not
hinging the houses at the proper time, but he dld not
how whether Mr. Hammond would enforce it. —His
Honour allowed defendant 4.3 damages, and gave judg-
ment for plaintiff for the balance of .63 13a.