The Dorset County Express and Agricultural Gazette.
Dorchester, Dorset, England, 1864-05-10 00:00:00

orsetobirt.
DORCHESTEL —Conine COMM Tuesday, Hay 3.
—4 Before E. Everett. Esq.
Only 33 plaint. were entered. of which the gr.ater
part had been settled out of Court.
Holleyoak e. Wheeler.— Debt?. —Defendant maid be
did not owe tbe mosey, and produced a receipt for
money paid.—Judgment for 3s. 64. and sosts.
Monier v. Shave.—Debt ES 7e. 44.—Delendant pro-
duced an amount, sheeriag more money paid than belied
been credited for.—Judgment for £2 116 s. fd. at 4. •
month.
iforior Dibben and wile—Debt 13. id—The
was disputed on the ground that the goods supplied had
beau for the father of defendant's wife and charged to
him is plaintiff's books —The odes occupied the dimi-
ties of the COSA for a long Hansard meshed in a verdict
of Dowsait.
Tbomea Hatchings —An nadirtMeeld 44,4 If
LI Us. 10d. —Order forthwith.
James,. &ideal. —Debt hi Ile. for board and lodging.
whisk was andimuted.—Ordered to be paid by three
tlfiltalmeats.
Rewrap. v. Hatchings. —An undisputed debt If
Ad Ida. 6L—Order forthwith.
Mandiallsey v. flutchinp.—Anotbeir uadiemited debt
.1 27 1.2 e 10L —Order forthwith.
Loveless v. Biles—An adios for assault —Maori
laid at 28.—11 i appeared from the evidence that a ma-
andmateading areas betwers the parties about some
barley, aleisa to he abort of he proper weight, which
defendant bought of plaintiff, which rmulMcl, when
Ike parties met at Leftism's home, in the defeeitant
taking him by tbe collar and boldiog him against hie
odes wall, which was the vault completed of.—His
Honor gave judgment far ft damages.
Puddloord Hewberry.—Te. plaintiff, who resides
at Menton, near Orr where', applied for his oasts of
attending ii Coert—Newkerry baying only paid the
!Dopey into Cotertthe previous day, w
ay, andbneoptidialrobad
bad 11 Is reech h .

eriEle—
Meets e. Brown.—Eleetment, to reamer poessedon of
• oottage at Foslingtos.—Poessesion ordered on Solar
day, the 7th owe
A Dierniren AetoutHri.—A writ of trial from the
Qualm's lietteli in the molter of John William Hamden,
of Leeds, against Jobs Pommy, of Dosolnester, wu
tried before Thomas Coombe. TM, 4.151,7-41vriff. vt 'lv
Shireholl, on Tuesday. Tbs action was brought to
reoomr E215,4d..f0r goods en pplied. Hr Symonds, in-
elmoted by Mr. reldey, plaietirs pollees, appeared for
Mr. Hemiden, and Mr. Weston for defendant. A jury
Was impannelled, compared of the following perms t-..
Mown. Joseph Fudge, (foreman), J. R. Taylor. Thomas
Patch, Ambrose Brown (Dorchesser). John Warren.
Edward Perhsta (CmrininstellameeCake(Bompstooe),
Alfred Chiloott (Striate.), !roods Tooke (Bradford).
George Scutt, junr. (Hartinstown), Gomm (Wads
(Stineford), and William Watta fLittlewood).—Ms
*moods opened the am at mane length, detailing &del
whieft will be found io the evidence, and submitting that's I
order to (testify &retain of articles ordered,it must be dose I
within • remittable time, and maintained that I. the
abeam of any 0001111110i4Sii011 from the 31at of August
to the 18th of September, was not • reasonable time.—
John William Raineden, the plaintiff, said he resided
et Leeds, and carried on the badness of a photogruphis
ehemiet. Amongst the articles be manufactured was
• liquid tolled Ituneden's Collodies The manufacture
we. • Side secret. Had serried on this manufacture
since 1862. This article was nehmitted to photograubic
artiste throughout the °wintry by travellers and ad.
vertimentents. Mr. William Turley travelled in tbia
pert of the .country. Plainer s roods of bminess was
this :—Preston' to Ma travellers starting on their
journey be emptied them with a ample of redlodion,
whish he mole with his own Mode, from which the
ledk was mandied. In &newt, 1868. he reeeived an
order threegh Mr. 'Tails; from Mr Foamy, for son..
oollodiee. which was Bent to him at 10a. per pint. He
also supplied him with some in 1860. In Angus', 1802,
he received an order from Mr. Pommy, throech
Ms traveller, for two plots a tooll'idion at 101.
per pint, one quire of reseed paper. Elm of acetate
of soda, Led some drachms of chloride of gold. That
order was rammed on the 16th of August. As invidoe
was met the mine day MI the goods left. He respired
the letter produced soon after the 28th of Nicest,
fresm defendant, in whish he friend fault with the
colour of the collodion, stating. that 10a. had been
'hared breach pint indeed of 7s. 61., mid suggesting
that it word.; be vielmnie to he whole of the
&Hied's. To ULM plaintiff wrote an 111111... T. in which
be deelined to take back the goods. and Hatted that in
(mere he Smeller should not °um. to Dorchester.
Plaintiff did not maim any reply to this communica-
tion, but souse time afters hamper from defendant was
brought to his premises, which he deelitiod to receive.
Ha wrote subsequently to hint on the suSject.and so the
matter stool. Ills the preemie' to send eat the collodion
and iodine in separate bottles when they *Detained •
plot, and that was done in the present care. The prim
*harped for the collodion was the ordinary one charged '
so photographic artists. The price to dealers was
7s, 6d. —Crom-emmined : It was the custom for his
traveller to dispose of all the old mausolea when he
returned home. Had often received complaints from
photographers, through his traveller, finding fault
with the collodion, but they wore groundless. It was
the fault of the photogrepbers in leaking ability to use
it. Had not heard that Hr. Foamy had acquired some
celebrity in photography, although be knew that he
had received mveral medals. Ple amid not deny
that defendant had complained Mont the collodion
not being good ,• perhase he might have allowed
him • pint for what he defendant) celled bad. The
orders whieb he ready in Dorehester were not
endiciont to some his traveller's mistime Did Sot
snow what had become of the hamper which defendant
sent hiss in September, 1962. The reason why be had
not taken proserlinp until the erring of 1963, WY
bee use he wanted to come to Mr. Putaney's own terms.
11. had placed the matter in the bands of his roliciter,
and could not Hate how the present delay occurred. He
was most &mime to ham the miss settled.—Reex•
ionised : Supposing his traveller had used a portion of
the ordlodion for having his likeness takes, be would
not be called upon to account for it. It was possible
that his traveller micht have allowed Hr. Poem, mine
collodion, but it wm not on the ground that it was bad.
Had heard that the venue ens first laid in London, but
at the instant"e of defendant it was removed to
DorchesSr.— William Turley, traveller to plaintiff ...id :
On the 22nd of August. 1062, he was at Dotelmeter, and
called on defendant. Had had some tranmotiont with
him previoualy, in articles connected with photography.
He prewented him with ari account, which he paid, and
witness then gam bins • list of the at Ides which he
sold, and also produced • temple of collodion for int-
mediate me. They wont into &gallery behind defendant's
shop and defendant tried it. Witness had hie likeness
taken, end defendant said the collodion was very sue-
oredul. They then returned to the front shop, where
he obtained an order of defendant for two pinta of
negative collodion, one quire of reeved paper, three
drechms of chloride of gold, and 2lbe. of estate of soda.
He entered the order In his book in the memos of de-
leaden& Within a day of the order being given he sent
• sem of it t" L eds. The price of edlodion was 10,
a pint to arti-t, and defendant had frequently paid bito
that pries Cron-manned : Defendant was mace un-
willing to give an order at Mat. He did ilot lecolli et
him stating that the collodion which le bad pee-
viuusly swayed wan meets Ile did not Hsieh be
opened • bottle containing Lonsden's collodioe whieh
Led never been Previevsll opened. Ile did not believe
he had his likeness taken float defendant's todludion, it
was from his (witatem's) sample, and defendant sail it
was a good likeer... lie might have allowed defentioat
In the till 1.0 imia him tor the oollodion which be said
was had. He did not believe defeudant took two like-
s-4m ef his st one., nor iiii he remember that de.
reedited took hie likenes. in Hand., 1863. After having ie.
oei et I the or er for the paper, the gold . sad eida, wittier
Said." As you are haying these other mods. you utey as
well hare SOSIe oollodion." He sid, "Send • pint."
Witime said "I smill send y"u two." sted &doleful%
made no reply. Wisest." le ..ked the order in the
presses .4 d. fendmi end hie son. Defendant did not
say than the co Whin .1,114. ouppli.d hint with was
too moelt • dovord. nor did he say he would supply
him silk s"tee tititt was almost colmrless. D d not
believe ti..fendent found fault shoat the reeved piper.
When did...dant ordered dm gold he wsntel it in three
Sec drachms; he did not order it in Migrant tubes He
made no complaint of the gold he Ist previmply re-
ceived. Witness was not paid by commisaion ; he
received • salary and it mots no difference to him
whether he sold largely or otherwise He was some-
what numayed when the hamper was went back. Did
sot reenemhe r opening the bottle pro no, d in Harsh,
bet if hie likens*s era taken at that time hi. sample of
eollod•un was toed. —lle-emesined : Had often bend
col. &on in bottles labeled SI iloneden'a which was not
that maker's. The failure in likenemt.king was often
reed by mi. man 'gement. Tits bottle tic llodion
which be hol given the d.fend-nt credit for was en
opened; therefore be emtld not tell whether it was
good or bed until he had used it. —M r. Weston, in.
behalf of his client, in the course of • long speesh,
after adverting to the fickle memory of Mr. Turley is
many point., contended that the goods wen" not motes
ordered, and maintained, quoting law on the subject,
that if • contract was destroyed in one part
it mast be entirely destroyed, and raid that
the goods were retained in • remonable time.
He then Galled di feodant, who said he was • photo-
graphic artist residing in this town, earreing et. busies',
Is an extensive way, lie had often tramseted busiesse
with Hr. Turley. On the 18th of Horeb, 1862, he
eettled an sosont with him, and produced a bottle of
andlodion which be had received front plalatiff previessiy.
Mr. Turley men.d it, in ommequeme of his (vitae')
complaints of the high ealour of the liquid. Tlea
collodion was then in the same (audition as when he
received it. Mr. Turlay suggested that his Skew=
should be taken—one with his °Audios and one with
his (definollant'a) This .se dose, the as. hk.....„.
Wag takes is me Imes. Mt. Tarts; asknowlgaisi
the it takes is his (defendant's) eollodion was
bet thre ose is plaintiff's liquid was bad. mid elm
• Sri.os, and he then allowed Ise the bottle. In
it
Mr. Turley visited him, SIMS ISMISINSiDS
. W.toess field him that be keit alrowly tested
*Wife seliodiors end that it was maim. He replied
that It was • differs's% sake now, being colourless, brit
he did not produce • simple. On this asenteme he mitre
an order for lib. If be bad heard that it wee Mr.
Tetley's Mimeos to mod Mhe. he sheald have eostra-
dieted it. When the traveller &Med about the reeved
piper, wire.. mid he amid not order any as it wee
lad. when the fernier replied that pkintiff bed •
new molter and produced • sample. Witness
said he Meek' not rim him en order, but he meld go
and talk to Me moo shout it. When the paper airived
it was of the same description as be had formerly
received. Hi. see gam es order for • quite of psper,
and 3 cleaner* of ag gun., of row, in usiriii:
Sebes. Chloride of sold, when exposed to the sir
beam' Imrifivd. Soon after the order was
given be received the hamper 001041.11/ff
lIM/ gOO4ll, but and* they WWI sot aemer-
fog to sow* returned them to Leeds.—Cross-exuale
sod: Had dealt with plaintiff on three oceasims
Had not got on, paper in he passed= which .
receivedfromplaintiff, as It wee
one MI sett He Ised •
/gain gab his is paper. Could not tell 1
....,.... ms oe the paper, Pot the stomp in the
mireer. In the moth of glir•E•lB62. the", 'la • WO*
• of oollodhoe, MON* ofilbt kine brio ordered., the pm,
vim gm' pe ejgg irsoolW, witiob had rowaised . .
Ms. moo for sot the bottle 'a. bw7owilillr,
Hciold was t,o wa:recolaroarod. IS August tot As.
trainer dfri sot pram" say asei4 •of oollwhis MI
• dula 04 t
.id w.. perissly cebothes4l,l=.4o kb:
,L ' briaerj 4,40 mow b••• • sand.
:.:S ,