The Dorset County Express and Agricultural Gazette.
Dorchester, Dorset, England, 1883-06-26 00:00:00

imperial Ilarlianunt.

HOUSE OF LORDS,

TIIL

lii.h •II rig., of L .rd. on Thur-dar, t,,e 1111111 • hTh-
ing genn• t• L. rd Alrettor ui L,rd Wolsoley gr.re road
• secohl tllnn.
FRIDAY.

In thy Ilouse of Lod,. on Friday. the Lad Chancellor
moved the 'multi rya tins of tae Pawnbroker. &11. which
wag dtaigacd, Le said, to übri vy sung cidliculbas In
•-nco to the tracing • f atolou cooda The Bid waa read
• vecoud In reply ta quatons. Lod Caslingford
expiamtvi tbe tn fi•urt ttkoi to prevent loans to Irish
Linnr. from hvi.,g imnv poly app I of. Tim total amount
advanced had Ite n £161.101 [orb Sodality, in reply to
Dclawarr, mot tee G .vernment found it imomaible
MU year It lavalate on the qui:titian of railway breaks.
Tha Alcestivr mad WAttelvy Grant bills passed through
coaimittes. and the aquae •41j,urszed.
MOUSE OP COMMONS,

TRUILIDAT.

in the Home of Commons Kr. Bradlaugh, an infrequent
visitor of late, woo in his place urrder tee gallery. His
pr.-soma wee explainrol by • qmation put by Mr. Peter
Traylor 13 tild Prim Minieteer ea to hither ho hod during
the past three sees, received resolutions loan numerous
large ',attended public meetings protesting agaimt the
borough of Northampton being deprival of its COestritto
tional repremot Mum in the Ileum of C.lll3rOolilt Mr.
Taylor further asked whether, II Mr. Br rel augh were fur.
bidlen to take his mat, he would support MAIM for a
nee writ. Kr. Ciladatooe apseered the drit question in
the affirmative. Wit, reapsct t the last, as the seat wee
not vacmt, no motion for a new writ c pod be made. In
reply to Mr. Lebouobere, th Speaker said he hal received
&Mailer remintione. but, as the limo.. of Commons could
be approached only by petitaue, he had not officially com-
municated memo to toe MOW.. In reply to Mr. Broad-
hurst, Mr. Oladetoae mid no deal decision had been crane
t with respect to the elerlition of the Wilmot Loral Privy
BoaL It estimated upon otoer strangements,_ which in
due c urea would lee mommunicated to toe Home. In
reply to q.. 4 run trom Led R. Courchill, the Attorney-
Gener•l stated Coat it Lod been decided not to attempt to
proci..d further in Grand C mmitaie with the Criminal
Code 11.11. To., li.ollo then resumed Committee oar the
Corrupt Prectrees Bill, taking up Mr. lialtlorro amendment
to Clout.. 4. clutch proposed 1, modify the provision that
• candidate fouled party of corrupt pract.cee ought never
again air for the orate ron..titUolley. Sir S. Northcote
supported the amendment. After souse dimension the Corn.
mitt..s divided, end the sureedmeut was nerfetiVed by 180
votos agar not 131. tire remit being rr cal awl with loud cheers
from the Ltm,,al benches. On th , motion of Mr. Warten
the (loveransent cow:boded o reduction of thrs• yeas in
the barring-out from the HOW,. of Gomm ins or a condi-
dote found guilty or corrupt practices. Trli term LOW
stands at seven years instead of ten. A long debuts
t airk pine, on CIALINI 3 on toe prop sal to Jelin, regency.
An astenilm at put forward with what view by Mr.
thirst was eventually withdrawn. Sr R. Cross proposed
to reduce trona seven years to the existenee of the
siting Parliament the period during which a member
found guilty if corrupt practices by agents should be
incapable of siting in the House o. (Ammon& On flirt
the Ormaretitee divided, and u' was rejected by 181 votes
&saint 91. Clause 4 was still wader discussion when pro-
gress was reported.
FLIDAY.

The House of Commons held • morning .Ming. fllr
Robert Peers Ettates Bid was read a third Uwe, after
protests from two there' members that such Bag were
eyed no of the d4thod Estates Act. The Home Secretary,
in reply to a question, said that he felt it desirable that
local authorities should have power to frame regulations
with a view to preventing such cat istropbes as that which
hal occurre at Sunderlani. 14. Deleon, in response to
Sr H. Max *ell, said the Government was uniable to
acc de to toe requeet or certain agricultural societies for
State aid to carry on experiments in petit, culture. The
Hoes, thin went ,nto Committee on the Corrupt Practices
Bill. rear' ming consideraton or Mr Guest', amendment on
clause 4. The amendluent was supported by two Con-
servative up•tribers, but Mr. Ratites had the candour to
itate that it the alteration were mode the Bill might as
well b. abandoned. After further diseusidan, the amend-
ment was with intern. Me Lewis then produced another
deuce for rendering the Bill worthless, but, findimi no
suppo t, withdrew it. Mr. Fowler next propowid an
aineudinent almist identical with that of Mr. Gorse Sir
Henry James stated that he was willing to accept trivial
, acts 1 treating, and would fescue • clenee to that effect
lithe amendment was withdrawn. Mr. Goma and others
areepted this couovesiou, but Me Chaplin strongly urged
Me Fowler L. persist in his amsndiueut, and in this be
we. riiMorted by Sir S. Northoote. In the course of the
docorsioo, Mr. Chambalain observed that the course
tilt in by certain moinbers might lead the public to
iuppoee that the Op isition were irreconcilably hostile
to the 1111. la to. opinion of the Government the
intendment woull ODOn • do ir to the practice. which
the II use ha I exert:se d itself anxious to pot down.
F.•endially Mr. F iwler &Aid leave to withdraw his
atuendinuer, I.ut the Conservatives insisted on a dieislon,
w tho prop ii4i we. relit-tell by 209 votes to HS Sir
Gar art ti.V brooght forward • resolution to mu •bib.
A .10. ill ct at Atjudd snide el, but eoesequently with-
drew t, nil C au-el wag admit] to. On Clause 5 Kenn.
Cora, and ilLtear proposed amendment., and thet
ii he litter bad not born disposed of when the Howie
adj earnest. At the evening sittins. Cilouel Coltherst
rim eted the old alleaaloas al to the failure of the Irish
per law steteux, and moved • reimiution to enable the
g•isillien4 to grunt out- door reli-f at their discretion. The
moll in we.. supp.wied by Several Parnellites, one of whom
op,se oi hi, °datum that Br ti.h taxpayer. ought to
defray the cat ii medical relief to the ULM poor. while
o,o:her a tinitted that if the law were altered the land-
Lords would be swamped by • increased taxation. Mr.
. . . . . . . .

Tri-v-Iyan p •toted out that Macleod. so far Irma
o. lerius li. rself benetitta I by her pr.a.nt system, was
ostintly enileavuu•ing to reset the Ir standard. It
had be•ti conclusively shown thst simper's= increased
stire out- luor relief we grantel freely, and the reason
We, that it enruurag-fl tho labourer ts be Tackle. tint t
r. ly upin th. ra..er. On tbe other band, when the work•
hiybe teat rote employe I, the I ib 'mar saved money, and
ih.cr .as.d. The re•uliition was eventually
rej crol by td robs against M. Mr. Warton next peo-
n .*Cti to ilistingulib trotted by a discourse on Perlin.
mentary procedit,, but the House declined to hear tilim
and wee counted out.