The Dorset County Express and Agricultural Gazette.
Dorchester, Dorset, England, 1878-03-19 00:00:00

Left that read* him very angry, and after he COM back
he at ones set up in opposition. That could be no excuse
for a man who wag cognisant of the taws of rage
coontry but, ea he said, the defer.dsot wee • foreigner
ant did not seem to have any very decided vlsws siemt
anything. (Laughter.) 11, had, however, told him no
lge winiM allow him to justify what he bad wriven,
coneequeutly he withdrew all imputation.; and he (Mr.
poilim) hoped they would both go home to Weymouth
and draw every tooth Biel Possibly could. (Laughter.)
Mr. GAO was very glad the defendant had pot himself
into the very sensible bonds of his learned friend. He
was a foreigner, but foreigners must be taught that in
thie country at all event,' they °odd not make atticki of
that kind. The plaintiff hod no wi.h to put money it
b. ...diet. and with the permission of the Court be
wo accept the epoloxy and a verdict for £5 ant costa.
The Judge: To mind the defendant to very lucky
winiiirii.t.%9ot:lgluishothiL.Lcutiruiliki2,oivtl:elm°b:diluliaire%usytigicevefnoruttir,
advice.
The Judge: I don't know what may be foreign law.
but if it ia that such a thing can be published it must bs
very strange, and I can hardly imagine any such country
101111 011. lam not heirs to expresso° opinion upon that;
but I think the defendant has adopted • very iudicioua
course, and I think the defendant would be wise in not
attempting any repetition of the tort.
Mr. Collins •. If he tokes tha advice of his solicitor he
will be in good hands.
This closed the cam.
Titaspiosasss v. Petrie and /sales (&J)—Mr. Hangdog,
(IC. and Mr. Worry (inetructed by Mr. Howard) were
for tile plaintiff. Mr. Cols, QC., 11 P., and Ur. Templar
(instructed by Masora. Toppiu and Newham, and (o.) for
the defendant,. In this action the plaintiff, the well-
known iced merchant, of Weymouth, sued the defendants
Mr. Petrie, a broker, in London, and Mr. Maguire, ,
corn merchant, of Limerick, for the sum ei
1377 Ina, damages sustained by the noirfullltof
.nt
of a contract It seemed that in October hee
the defendant Petrie wrote offering the Pbantlif a c argo
of fine black Irish oats at Ka. 61 per quartar, an, the
plaintiff, after some bargaining, agreed to bay it at
MA fa, which wee la. 6d. above the market price. pre tided
It arrived In good condition. The reseal was, ho, eeeer,
delayed by contrary wind., and upon its arrival th;
plaintiff woo obliged to sell it at a loss amountlna to the
sum he claimed. Before evidence had been sal led the
learned counsel, under the direction of his li
arranged that a verdict should be taken for 4360, as
against Petrie, subject to an appeal, and the qui eteost of
damages as against Maguire to be loft to the c<iert
above.

-77ense v. Leduc—This was an action for the division of
a stream of water from the Little Chen MAIL Mr.
, Cole, Q.C., MP.. and Hr. Castle. lloatrtscted by
Mend Nantes of Bridport for the plaintiff, and Mr.
QC., and Mr. Sullen, Instructed by Mr. Hunffry,
Bridport, for the defendant. The parties are cousins,
the plalutlff being a retired capteln, and the defendant •
deacon In Holy Orders. The *unties Is the owner of the
mill, and the defendant rents soma meadows through
which the stream which drives the mlll runs. For thg
plaintiff, it was sworn that the stream was used to drive
the will, but at times, when the water was not required,
and the tenant of the meadows wanted it to water this
land he was privileged to use it, but for the defendant. It
was stated that the right of use's of the water belotiged
to the owners of the fields, and that the millers had on
occasion, asked permission to have the whole strew ,
consrled to the mill to drive it. A number of wittimar
was called on either elde, and the case, which C 001111•00 ,d
onßoturday at noon, lasted all Monday. and cocain, od
in favour of the plaintiff.