The Dorset County Express and Agricultural Gazette.
Dorchester, Dorset, England, 1882-10-03 00:00:00

PETTY SESSIONS.

TIIIIII3Dii.

Before the Mayor (R. Aldridge. Eitl.). N. Wester°. 0.
Cwt., and li.Fsrmer. &pre
Emma Taylor v. Joespe Taylor.—Tlits was an adjouroed
ant. t tear. It was now stated the parties had a.rsed
to eeparste, the tether t • hsve the care ol t. Lhi dr•n
nod the case eaLecoo d,n.ly al owe IL,i be wit hdiawa.

_
co/Wm:Meet oukcitore.
Mr. Herbert From) w. charged With neglecting to
have his child vaccinated.
Mr. Young stated that in behalf of the Guardian, he bed
giveno t a to defendant to have his child vaccinated.
but he had ueglected to do so.
Mr. Frond admitted the offence, but respectfully sub.
mitts.] to the Bench two or tsre• statements. In the Met
pia e he said the v....impulses, VaoOUlattoll Act acted most
untie:ly. For instance, Lord 8.-end-Flo might coins
tiler, and pay the tin. imposed, and he co sld laugh at tie
Act; but, sit regards persons in his positiou, they would
either be inspoweriehed or, it of • lower grade, .ant to g.ol.
Detendant ben quOtod • nuenbcr of aphis'se with the
object or showing that since the merits oi the Act the
troth-rats among Young cuildien bad doubled.
Mr. We •torn remarked this had n.t slag to do wits The
case beton. t atm. They had every respect tor private
views, but they cduld not evade the Act of Parliament.
Mr. Curt : Before this Beach no &demos will be
sk..wo between Lord 80-and-Bs sod lon.
Mayer said the defendant bed placed them in a
peek enrd pdetterm. The) had • great respect
for honest opinion., but they couldn't go againt the A. t of
Paellameot. Ti. defendant wee settiog a bed exempt., t
men not se well educated as himself. Th owes his ie cowl
offence. and they hoped it could not occur main. Tuey
hied folly c widened the case, sod he musespey • fine of
10s. and cost.
James Allen, Francis Curt s, and Willie= Will,, were
summoned under the gloriation Act for neglecting to send
lbws children to KbOA.
Mr. 11W. Dickineon prosecuted ea behalf of the BArd,
and Mr. Mowlem, the School Attendance Officer, proved
toe 00005.
The case of Allan was withdrawn, aa the husband was
out of work.
Cartis was fined Ss. 61. and Will. la.
James Dyke wee summoned foe noo-oompliance with a
previoUS order.
The wife pleaded the child was suffering from to
al:ecces, tend the Bench lava the defendant the benefit of
do it, and simply made an attendascs order. In tas
secdnd Cade against the defendant, • fine or 5, cis

i
Susan Mogan', hawker, well charted with an assault
upou Aon Fancy, widow.
Mrs Fmcy, it would seem, keeps • lodging-house. and
the defendants " b,y" (age i 15) war eta) sne
Odorants arose between to, poru. $ with r.ferento to tn.,
and the deGudeist thramen.d to jell her two black apts.
(JD S sturds) mph, deleudent smut in there dflthl.-
anti bet WIN she (the compl alarm, ) *old not let 13 r is, up
stairs, sir., posited her way in. IJpOll that she —31.•
Fancy—told nor unloose ynu go out I must put' out ; and
she only pot her band upon her, when out Ma wen,. After
that err. Came back, and getting her
in • e.rner pow.
melted me.
Itichard Stokes wits ea led as • witusee, and rail the
defendant at the tune was very much under the cilluents
of drink.
hthry Ann Crawford was also ininirOOned for ag assault
up al Mrs. Franey. The charge war mixed up with the
other.
Mrs. Crawford went to the complainant's Irmise to look
for ber hosband, and Ith her in tit, eye*.
In reply to the defendant, Mr.. Fancy said she did a t
at the tame express a wish that she only hal h r thick
hoots on, ana sire would give her something in the
ii,..
Stokes was also called In thie case, and said Mrs. Craw.
ford joined in the general meal (melee) I rom what he Co Id
see.
Defendant' were fined in each ease 55., and costa Sr. di,
or seven days' hard Latour.