The Stourbridge Observer, Cradley Heath, Halesowen & District Chronicle.
Stourbridge, West Midlands, England, 1870-08-20 00:00:00

FURTHEis PARTicULARS.
PARIS,

It is stated that the Prussim lute at the bath,
,f Longevine, on tunday, was b, tweet' eizteri
and eiguteen thousand men. Marshal Haan.
tots beet contending ....me Sammy with Princi..
Frederick (Juane* soli (Senor:l Steinmetz's at
ones. miaow-mg rospeai.vely 2,0.)J and 70,00 U
wen.
Tue Goahos says the Baltic fleet has received
rders Lu claim it aen V. 1144111111 ctimuiercltt
so todemoity of &mina the amount or th
.ouirioution exrcted by tile Ptussiaus at place-
in Frencii territory.
Ills tekgreoi nos occupied thirty hours iz
transmission.

Pis, Mare ley Evening.

The Emperor a, sta. '.pored to be at Rdellll-
- Lae reitillaClL Cf COIFS .111 t
reamed Citileue ou the 16th, uumb,rett
1,500. Oa au 84ue deo vie force.' Cholou

Jmount.:4 t ) troupd w

A PRUSSIAN REGIMENT DESTROYED.

A PRUSSIAN PRINCE KILLED.

NOS, Friday.

A further official account of Tuesday' a battl.
states that a reginis lit of Prussian Lancers sys:
destroyed, and their colours captured. It is alsi
stated tle:t the Pcassian P. wee Albert we•
killed. A: the clod° of the day the 1. much wer,
umaters of toe positions previoamy occupied
the enemy. On ‘Veduesday is,veral engage-
ments to.is place who the rear gaard.
A private telegram da:ed .‘ Paris, Thursch:,
night,- says the battle was resnieed on Wednet.-
day, unit appeared to be iu favour of the French.
'the Paris correspondent of the Daily Tel,
graph says the recent reported •iettiri,s of 0..
Frencii have not excited mach totem-m.4n.
l',lnparor, Prince Imperial, and (Ileac Napulai.
have arrivud at Rheims. At Chalons the Ete- '
eeror was badly received.
The Paris correspood,nt of the Dnily News;
in a telegram of to-day, describ,a the news v
the rseent French vimories as navin4 been ro-
ceived with great enthuoiasm The PrUllsial,
10. S it said to be very great.
The Times says the Faissians reconnoitering
near Schelestadt were attacked cud repulsed
the peasantry, at. It the Is of ten killed, and
I some prisoners

LriCliterf Aso lia•Cireet. Hcra —llr, S.A. kt.wrlt's
Wos,o'ii Hale RE,ToRta oR DRESAING ir,er fail 4 te
quickly restore Gr.ty or Muted //air to it. vionnful colon
cud bowity. Awl with tha firct application • beautiful
Kiut *al drlightfal fragroicc given to th, HAir. It
top VIII Hair ft.,tu fallitlg wit It pmeoti bsldner.‘
It proni.A.., ;0 tier reorratioa
•. hour 111 hitg, Haul
ley i'l,,,Lti4ts cal Pettaa,
everywhfire. Ditpiit. 266. High H Iluori, Lonaon.---Ina
tAlltioßarl'a HAIR. -- Mrs. ALLEN'S •• ZVLoSALSANCE
fir ilerk"nl' Poised* or Our oi', col 1,, a tl,ligLtiN.
Meriting ;it in diStind nit separate preum orlon
from the Moatorar. and it+ air not required mall it.
...It 7.v, • aloioritn, Thr«6l
‘.l / • ..k4l or, Imiorni,ll,4atE
r, • la.: EA%

• . . •I t• • hi
•
Ups Si sob oat
brook,.

THE STOURBRITNGE OBSERVER.

MS/11mM v. Whitehnnse and liabinann.—lii this
'IMP Air. W. Cala omit:wed for plaintiff, and
Mr. Hamfray for defimdatita.
Defendants are coal titer thants in Stourbridge,
and the action was brought to recover £2O, for
money lent, being a cheque drawn by
plaii.ff ii.
favor i.f defendant Robinson, on account of the
firm of Whitehouse and Robinson, to meet sonic
pressing claim.
Mr. Edward Francis Harvey proved that he
called upon both the defendants on the 4th iif
August last for the money. wbi-h they ndmitted
having reeei,,d, but could not then pay the
amount, tat off-red a six month.' bill.
Mr. Hotufray repudiated the lost to the ftrni,
ind in consequence of the plaintiff's absence, and
.f something being said about a negociation be-
ween the parties fir a further loan, the case
as adjourned to the next Court.
Nash v. Maw orth.—This was an action brought
by Mr. Thomas Nash, builder, to recover the
411111 of £1 88 for repairs done under the orders
of George Bosw orth, fitlfnionger.
Mr. Collis appeared for plaintiff, and Mr.
Burbury for defendant.
From plaintiff's evidence it appeared that the
ilefendant ordered hint to repair a shop, which
he was going to occupy, and £1 8s was for the
work done.
A witness was called, who heard defendant
order plaintiff to do it.
Mr. Burbury contended that defendant did
not give the order, and that be had never owl.
ed the shop. He had offered to take to it at
...idsumnier, but some one else was put in the
place before that time had expired.
His Honour thought the plaintiff had charged
too mach for the repairs, and gave a verdict for
him for his, and costs.

Ways Inn. Cradley Heath. wee brought up on reman
tad charged with harma her house open during prohi
oiled honrs,,m the 31a4 ultimo. Mr. Raves def. oriel
rr of rep. tone" 1,11 alrmrly apreared Mr 0"7"'
called William Giegory. who card he went to Mrs. Coo's
on the shove date, at bill o'clock in the morning. Wen,
to ask the daughter to vo a walk in the evening. Cross-
raswined by Mr. Mina: Did not see any rum drunk.
Did not nun any one under the pianoforte. The Magni.
1 :rates could not agree ill the ease