The Dorset County Express and Agricultural Gazette.
Dorchester, Dorset, England, 1865-04-11 00:00:00

THE DORSET COUNTY EXPRESS AND AOttICULTURAL GAZETTE, TUESDAY, APRIL 11, 180.
1 '''rni "71 T a r)t, (r ',' /
•sr.• trtyris contended- thart ft ware—
question. Mr. Waters sent in an account for 1855 in
1857. This aoconnt was laid before hie fuelitor, and it
perfeetl7
subsequently passed undet the eye of Lord Shaftesbury,
in 1857, for his approval. Surely, therefore, his lord-
ship was able to state, from the account now placed in
his hands, and which was before him in 1857, what wag
the amount charged ho Mr. Waters, on the settled
estates. Do you see £10,768 7s. 2d. disbursements on
the settled estates?
Lird Shaftesbury: I did not object to that item then,
and I don't now.
, Mr. Lewis: I intend to show out of Lord Bhaftes-
bury's own month the entire innounce of this gentle-
man before I sit down. It is all eery well to hunt a
men down with handcuffs.
Cross-examination continued: It appears that remit.
tance,s of £17,448 18s. were made by the prisoner in that
year. I aumot recollect whether any mistake was
made in the course of 1855. Of my own knowledge, so
for sa 1 have gone through the acconnts, aided My my
able solicitor and my able accoantants, I have come to
the conclusion that Mr. Waters is deficient in his
aoolionts. I cannot speak of my own knowledge as
to any errors in his accounti in 18..%, nor can Ito the
year 1856 I trusted to Mr. Burnett, in whom I had
entire confidence. My amount for 1855 was 'settled,
errors exoepted. I have not • shadow of recollection
whether I ever paid any money to Mr. Dew. This
would be paid out of monies that Mr. Waters would
, draw out of the state account. I am not charged in
' the book produced with any money paid to Mr. Dew.
°fifths receipt produced I see that Mr. Waters paid the
calm of £5B to Mr. Dew in January 1857, the date he is
'shamed with emldezzline £27. I see Mr. Waters has '
osnrnitted to charge the £5B he paid to Mr. Dew to me.
In 1867 I was borrowing money at Heare'a bank for
draining purposes, which was remitted to Mr. Waters,
and against which he drew for drainage payments. I
know no more of the accounts of 1857 than is eontained
in these books. I cannot say whether there were
omissions on both aides of the accounts of 1857. At
the time I arranged to remit about £6,000 a year for
estate purposes, and the defendant collected about
, £20,000 a year. In 1867 the defendant had to keep '
the estate accounts. I swear that in the year 1857 the ,
-defendant was not keeping an account called a
"domestic amount." I have no recollection of his
rendering me a domestic amount in 1857; but ha did as
di, a anbaequent year.
. • (4 letter written by Lord Shaftesbury, dated 18d7,
was bare read, requestieg the defendant to render an
itsectuat of the private and domestic aecountj
- L'rosa-examination-eontinued :By the word "domestic"
aecount I meant private and domestic amounts. The
difference was this ~the private amount might have
included the stables, but the domestic account would
Include payments to the servants and other ermines"
if the bourse. The debtesdant cfid not, in the year /867 i
•stend me • distinct domestisaceount
• The amounts from 1856 to 1850 were produced,
proving that these amounts were kept separately and
rendered each year by the defendant.
Cross-examination continued.-1 may have forgotten
that he rendered ins a domestic account in 1857. I may
also have forgotten that be rendered me a private
mount in that year. I swear positively that up to the
year 1859 I never received vouchers for the domestic
asegents. I may have received one or two, but I did
net receive them as a rule.
Mr. Lewis here read an extract from the paid amount
book of 1850, in which Loed Shaftesbury acknowledged
the receipt of vouchers, and admitted himself satisfied
with the amounts, and then pursued his oress-examin.
ation by asking the witness if, in the facie of those
written facts, he persisted in stating that he had not
received vouchers. Whereupon Lord Shaftesbury
said :—I may, in one or two inatanoss have received
vouchers for the domestic acomati, but not regularly.
As a general rale I was satisfied with the statement
which he gave me. The arrears, £3,62.1 13s. Od.,
allowed by myself and signed by Mr. Burnett, were
caused by an exam of expenditure on domestic and
private amounts, and I was satisfied both as to the
amount and the distribution of it from the vouchers
having been put before me. Mr. Burnett wrote to me
for an explanation, and I requested Mr. Waters to give
me in detail an account of the items that caused the
overdraw. The answer I sent to Mr. Burnett was
drawn altogether from the statement made to me by
Mr. Waters, that the excess of expenditure—l adhere
to the words—had been gauged by the expenses of my
private and domestic account. Having received the
statement from Mr. Waters, I repotted such unlimited
confidence in him that I took his word without one
moment's question. I wrote to Mr. Burnett, and mid
I was satisfied both u to the amount and the distribu.
lion of it, meaning the items which had been expanded.
And now comes the expression, "vouchers having been
put before me." I plead guilty to a very great error
and great mistake when I used the word "vouchers."
Writing confidentially and hurriedly to my agent, I did
not use the term in a legal sense, that is,
voushers sent with that names attached. What I=
by vouchers was the hosed statement of what I believed
to be a honest man, so help me God. (118 lordship
then threw the book which he held in his hand robe.
inanity on the table.)
Mr. Lewis; Gentlemen are not in the habit of con-
ducting themselves in that war. , • ,
Mr. Humphrey.; Duet be impertinent. "; -'
Mr. Lewis: He has broken my book. Now, Leal
Shaftesbury, do you mean to say, having written that
letter in 1862, now you have aloud the prisoner's mouth.
by imputing grime ti him, you come here and say no
vouchers were furnished?
Lord Shaftesbury; I have no recollection of
seeing them. In the amount of 1859 there is a
balance of £499, du to somebody, but not to Mr.
Waters. I will swear that I never understood
this sum of £499 was due to Mr. Waters,
but to an overdrawn account at the Blandford Bank.
I believe I was indebted £499 because I had exceeded
my income to that amount. I believe it was du to
some one; but, so help me God, I did not believe it
was due to Mr. Waters. In the year 1859 I knew that
my account was overdrawn £4,000 with the Blandford
bank. It was overdrawn, because I was not enabled
to remit so much money from London, being at
that time very mach embarrassed in my London
expeuma. The drainage account has not yet been
*milted by my accountant, bemuse he could not
get at the books; they were suppressed by Mr.
Waters. The approximate amount remitted during the
two years, 1857 and 1859, might have been £9,000 or
£lO,OOO. Occasionally I have sent Mr. Waters, monies
for special purpose., and ia some instances I have
received vouchers back. I should not expect Mr.
Water, to send vouchers back for, small sums, but for
sums of £25, as that would go to the general account
True, there were • couple of vouchers for ESA I spoke
to the defendant about his ommotion with the tad,
because he wee breeding race-horses. The artateineirt
made to me was that he was breeding for the turf, but
dieleveriesl ham aineamide go a great deal further.
At that time he was renting a farm from me at a rentol
of £220. It was at that time he was breeding lks,
horses, and when I spoke to him about it he gave itgg.,
The overdrawn account in the Blandford Bank inertness,'
every year, in consequence of the defendant paying in
money and drawing it out again and not accounting ,to
me for it. I hive not upon my notes any sum of money [
drawn out in 1860. I cannot say if the defendant peid.
in £1,260 which he omi red to credit himself with. NOT
do I find that in 1861 there were say monies drawn out
with which I was not credited. Ido not know that in
1862 the defendant drew £275 158. 101. which In not
credited to my amount. After the defendant left my
ferrate he furniahed a supplemental amount from 1852
to 1863, showing the items of payment and expen-
diture, of which no mention was made in any amount!
which had been furnished before. I was first made
aware that Mr. Waters had instituted proceedings
against me in the Court of Chancery, shout
August, 1864 Tread the bill in Clianeery. Myanmar
was filed in March, 1865. That suit has never been
determined. I first saw Mr. Bidwell about urea or
eight months after Mr. Waters's resignation. I was
present when the warrant against the defendant was
applied for. The fat that the prisoner had instituted
a suit against me, lain not sure was mentioned to the
magistrate who granted the warrant.
Mr. Lewis: I think it just to the bench of Magig
to get this question answered. I wish to know: who
the Bench were told these Chancery proceedings ware
then pending?
Lord Shaftesbury: It might have bec4l,l.hut I a•
not recolleet.
Mr. Lewis: Did you give toy diTeatfons for the
prisoner to be handcuffed'!
Mr. Cole: I must interrupt.
Lord Shaftesbury ... Lot Mtn go on. for God's sake!
I never would have dode such a thing. I have aim*
heard of It.
The following letters were here put in And read, with
the vie* or sho ',dog thet the state of Lord Shaftesbury's
affairs would not &dna of his Maraud robbing him of
LI 1,000 Without at mace groesing his stutipidon.
se. ay' 14 Driff,
matt ithammins the. ... • - . .
* 470' A
sament not only e
.„,_ . 't' ' *ix
Thin hi the 'result of my , '," . . eu
£1,000.' 4id no thinkini ;, :S -
be rents, tau, had been Pad , to. i : of the
tidal bankers.
"Bat the sums paid are act mar unequal le the &red
demands by mortgages, 7re., but they are, Infinitely
short of the demands, however small, for agate pur-
poses.
I have not, hi TIK-11—flIffinifilhet mild be no
applied. The monies remitted to Messrs. Hoare since
October last to the present time-are lax Wallow those
that were remitted during the 1119,4 period lass year,
notwithstanding the arraegerrolB4 that fleshing
.6404 be retained in the annital WWI fertrarded to
losadon. lasi in Remo plazas. hooter oa both ateetints,
Remote and estates,' 0114 Memell almost a hanlusipt.—
T-mr obedient servant,
, __

. -
Lord Shafteebtry : Have you done with me?
Mr. Lewis: It's usual, sir, when • solicitor site down.
Be-extunined by Mr. Col.: fiapposing the amount at
Blandford bank was not sufficient, his duty would have
been to have overdrawn to a certain amount, or to have
applied for further remittances. I never had any in-
ilermation that any portion of the excess was paid by
rag prisoner, nor can I 604 upon exambudion of the
,ssunts that it was. Applications have been made
in time to time for the production of the drainage
books, but they have not been produced. There is no
frith, but It's the very reverse, that Kr. Waters bad
•siny right to profits upon the drainage contracts. The
Contrast was mode upon my responsibility with my
Annoy, and he was my paid servant. The custom of
the society is to allow the agent of the landowner to be
. the contractor, or for them to perform the work them-
calves. In this ease the agent wee my servant —tar.
Oohs then put in a letter found upon the prisoner, and
,feßdreened to Mr. Blenkyiron, offering his six brood
eases for sale, at a sum of £1.550.1—1 have never
'received any credit for a cheque for 2273, sent in
October, 1861, to pay
.specific bills. They ire *WOO
Bri :11est 'Me, and there is no trace of it in the amonet
isinsubdure the Chancery proceedings were taken
he was informed by Mr. Baxter that criminal
proceedings were probable. Mr. Humphreys, the
solicitor, was called in with regard to that very ekijact
long bifore the Chancery proceedings were instituted.
It wasimporrible to be more indulgent than I was to
the prisoner up to this time. I treated him more like
a brother. I never gave any directionitolliskonstahle
with regard to the apprehension of the grimair, nor did
I see the officer. I have paid six per cese.,..sintounting
to £4,000 a year, for the money for drainage. Tbia was
to have been made up by the increased rents, toatl am
afraid they will not amount to more than £1,830 per
year. Mr. 'Waters drew for his salary upon the estate
amount.
His lordship was under a:Amhara) fire hour&
Mr. Robert French Burnett : I am one of the firm of
Niehol, Burnett, and Newman, solicitors 18, Carey.
street, Lincoln's-in-fields. I began to iiiit for Lord
Shaftesbury in 1852. I undertook the duty of auditing
, the accounts. The rental was furnished by the prisoaer
and a statement of other receipts and disbursements. I
did not see his cash book or diary, and 'Only lately the
pass book, and that was to see that the interest
was rightly charged. If I had known that the arrears
of Targett had beet paid, I should have debited the
prisoner with it. In the 1860 account there is no entry
of the prisoner's showing the receipt of a cheque for
£273. Any cheque sent by Lord Shaftesbury to pay
' bills, not for estate purposes, might not appear in the
.sienoant. I should have expected to find it under the
heed of cash reasived from Lord Shaftesbury, or in the
general balance sheet, but 1 male find no trace of it.
. lb. Lewis said he should give in. trouble about this.
'lt :met be admitted that it was not in any account.
Witnem : On the margaiia of the prisoner's diary I find
the figures, 273, under date of October 1, 1860. He had,
it appeared, epee the same date ped bills to the amount
of £265 odd. This he had debited Lard Shaftesbury
with.
Mr. Cole explained that what he at present set up
. was that the prisoner had deleted Lord Shaftesbury
glith the amount of those bills but he bad not credited
with the cheque for £278, out of which they said
9ne Pad paid them.
Ildr. Lewis, in orosoerunination—Everybody might
TAR into error, let me knew what means you took, to
. .
lligek Mr. Waters' accounts?
-/ Witness—l used to go to MOW& Hoare to Mtlifyl
rete. that the remittances alleged to be seat by Mk
ers, to Lord Sheteeleary's 11111601llit bad been made:
also produced vouchers for all disbarment:A.l4 with
-aximptions' and by comparison with previous rentals, I
disenveredif there bad been any change in the amount
received front any tenant, by She prisoner. When I
complained of the inasearacies of his amounts he
ascribed it to his clerks. Whenever I pointed out any-
thing he always seemed desiroas to set it right. In
February, 1864, I got the hankers' books, and die-
covered that payments' had been made to the
account width 'might to hasp been midis to the
amount, and were charged in the somant as remita
but there were errors on the other side, for there weio
two sums of £3,000 each remitted to Messrs. Home, esighl
which be had not credited himself. There were mei
on both sides. Upon the lute of the vouchers Mr.' 1
Waters gave to use it was plain that be had paid
monies into the estate secosint instead of the private
account, but it escaped my notice. I should say the
money received by Mr. Waters from Lord Shafteatbury
during the time I had the auditing of the account most
have amounted to £300,000, and It would appear that
during that time be might pay about ii 200,000 in dis-
bursements. There have also imespeative of that .bees
two large drainage acoounts pass through his hands.
I have tried to understand the supplementary amount,
but cannot.
Be-examined—The residilidrithivestigation was a
balance of £4,861 4s. 44.' dull ' Lord Shafkriblit7
on the estate eeeettet. With regard he the dredame!
account I felt.X could not4mid r eratene ilit,
ie am-
elusion was Tom siaaePtiven,
stand there wish defichiney ,
.7'otabeo,ioe
„ot , . '
-- :
By Mr. Lewis.-I do net in any wey plesig.6 re
there £ll,OOO or £12,000 deficient, but -as far ast
opinion goes I believe there was £4,000 neon the estate'
account; the drainage, or private, and dont aro &mounts
are not included in that amount,._ner. 0 amount of
m £4,000 and odd which Mr. Waters 411*l -hive spent
upon them.
Itematimined--I never heard, however.isiithis anidel
on . the part of Mr. Wooten until I.B64embisit he had
beet discharged.
' , In reply to lamtain Falwasser—,;*4 was dis-
c-
liClosed in July, nu..
' ' Mr. Levris-1 should like to keberielitligliedireing
I. &mad render such &neonate es libeeedeeklb ir9.170,
' • 'The Court then adijeniggdc) 'II se ,f,/ . '',l_l Si
Eke 11. '

--
PlitrmY.
Thim morning the Omni rimmed the investigation at
eleven o'clock.
On taking his seat en the Bemis Ks. Golden ex-
-pressed a hope that the lesepedißien would oon-
hm oe themselves *fatly to the jilt had, bee*
much pained °kilts jtgelooditpg a
Williao .readmg of
several ktterk,l-r" -
..a.'aa.4
A . at
YeZtiole 1, rvi,"bling="l-r- -""
' -father tag to
rent • farm of Leg Siliffieliark,r witeess masieted
hint in the managautent of ie. I *Was is the habit 'of
going with his fatker. to ItiG -Willem& house when he
d the rent. Kr. Wats" ;wee Zaverterd to LW
haftesbury and reaelee4 ths rents. . mberod Pa
4
father's losing some shp 4;1,10K loos natal
iVSN &boat £7OO, and in BM there wa:in spew 04
onoowiting to 1t52 Ili. 7d. Vrftnebei the). tog -
,Waten of It, and asked him to LOA sw .
imw ,to lorgiv• him the arrears' of rent,
prolderatiou of the . low 'he hot - seillaiiiia
hi tpo death of the sheep.- The prisetter Wake* aftet.
*WO tAki tben that. bis lodiship maid lid danisibi
Ortvkirs or rents, as tbe farm was so cheap. ' awl they
must therefore pay, it. Witness oottid wt. ressombes
Whether be was present et the tispa. Ou teakucitellet 19
*fresh Ms limpet --Apelartul OP he OM tip
itetweisetten sea...,
Waters NM Mn lordship oa n/u 8
te c.a.0.144e Om t!
Al oh.
the farm bee we *help:. 'WilitPli 'liar • , ' ~
1.414. d whir Mr. WOW' 'abed% QM'
En • ineatiweed •g ' aiuttagllv-WittrA
ey taw& the mall. • ,piewlef ,ii
• whwe ids, fetbitr 5 ,pelit..W Jaa...141. :..iii;e7rfat
te'teeft. who, nut piolawlak ifs . Wgene 'ling.,
aFt, ton the ;. oil Ana. w Ilia WINK, peg
LIM fildeb.balkb44.ogt- li—rso 14,i
.: rl wag
kid in i !Zee.' ' anae gnu
'r
:gems' *de: I ' ' " '
he
bee 4
ter 4 tfr lipasiV
emespetbilareiletilltAilir ' • e
ifeeeligilbeiebegee .
isse ' an
Asair ' lef
4 labs ' fate

an

Eyol
-

(oar .._ _ --- ,/.1 a,/ 0-1,1
"Mr- Wiiffs•-".c.d -min,.
Ula
" Lord 111/1101/144411* h. Ai soya ha A'
meat. lidefttlAth tWoerWe.-; Het &mother
In vliner, and Tim dispooed tebottete at i..fis eget py
him io be hi *ln oat of the Roan oe intitodt—'
y 4 Yet bow has- I meet ' the ahhiliois ti rEiihriA
into debt I aos odaewly tyreettiliefteetl—by ,
fisouniary obbmitiopo What wombiloodboawa beidtiehi
40-14Wiloodiimre at St.-Cabseaf.,Lieostotworresgie•
up all hope of residenoe here this year. The 'the& ori
intreek wa, frightia GOV mosoootatoo.pomdtde
•14 • • - wiati :, lla'n: i .. '1
.r Olt: I 4a, noir Aimele haw* *
tiltfrom 7.41W19Ph0u1t..; sr sitit pialarl 3
the ,I*o,4334l:lloo7o6e:edpese tr . hiqr
Ow eneriglo3l344: won li . Polli .1411w3lobedieot

I

*drew had so, got
WM, Aviskett Alt Oa
.c:

_
to • Arty.
•
gro bale Oklooted to dilt alatitiot imlftirb '
' ' ' IffiihroCi oolt di r
0.1,11 i• 104 r 1.9 rsi oe.loO& in Mit • •
fij 0t4t.481107 hid fr4tignob !V.+ stabA c 4-1
NtT "".aft act litutt tcY ba4 , ~.t

"i!gibo= I

aratisiairi
4- made

Mr. Cole : I hope now you have had an opportunity
of saying something to the gallery we shall go on.
Mr. Lewis: I shall have an opportunity of saying
something to the megirtnatee presently, and to Lord
Sbaftethery too.
Esandnation continued: About £5,000 was spent
in improvements during ten years. In 1854
I heard the prisoner had been connected with
the turf; and I communicated, in sonsequence, with
the pritioner, and wrote to him on the enbjeot The
letter I received from him in reply said that he would
discontinue all connection with the turf. The prisoner
never advanced money on my amount or to me per-
sonally. In Marsh 1862, I had communication with
Mr. Burnett regarding the 1859 aooount, and some
oorrespondence passed between prisoner and myself.
Prisoner said he was unable to explain it in his distress
—his wife being dead—but he believed Westcott could
render it correct.
[A letter was here read from Lord Shaftesbury to the
defendant complaining that the 1859 amounts had been
negligently kept. A reply from the defendant was also
read, acknowledging his neglect, and expressing a hope
that his future amounts would be more satiataatory.]
Examination continued : Westoott was the clerk
employed by Ida Waters, the latter having repro-
seated, about 1854, of being in ill health in eoneecnienee
of Moralised liminess, and I consented to his appointing
a clerk. Prisoner at that lime lived on my estate at
Vt. Oilea. Hs had £350 a year for the Dorset imitates,
Mil an additional £BO tor the Yorkshire estate, making
BM He lived rent hoe, aud I paid the whole of his
inevelling expenses. Weatook's salary *as left to
Iritersie fix. In April,lB62, pricionerwrote a number
Mb Bikes to me as to Westoott's state of mind, saying
In clits lingerers to himself and others, and that be
Isesoldscommit some aot of doleme. Prisoner asked
my *dyke. I remind the totter on the day I held my ,
weekly commission in lunacy. I went down to the
commisdon, of Which I was chairman, with thu letter
in my pocket, end I wrote a letter upon the a=
the prisoner. I stated that ft wss one opining
wag theerly insane, and *wearied that hist/asks beim
lunatic asylum should be immediate—but he mist Best
get a aertifieste from two medical man. I km&
nothing of the facts but such ae Waters had sonnitends
ceded to me. I had come further oommunicatisistagell
the subject. ' In one of my letters I wrotey illf
Westostt returns to - 'thisnage, and shows ant
desire of coming /10 , lit. Odes, you must Wind
him ; and elionkl be &reek* yea, summon him, and
the magistrates will determine whether he ft a
fit sub** fer a lunatic asylum." In another letter 1
Mailed Bust lady Charlottithilare bee written a liftmen
my lady, staling that Weskok's wife had complained
of hie wanting to shut up her husband in a ltesatis
asylum, when be was perfectly mac. I said," Bow
thin is false, and the hest thing yin' can say is, that you
acted tinder my directions. They bath refined, the
Daly remedy and.' wash my hands id bin" lin ma.
elusion ordered. him to be discharged- Is August I
saw Weikel*, Me madam undoubtedly cone and lig
Is an ame. , le ISIS .ra attentica wee caned by Mr.
Burnett tee nentli Um is prisoner's accounts,
and. 8, imandidensee4 wrote to him telling him he could
not sontiedie in my rvies but I would give him A
opportnnity of resigning [The lager from Lord
Shafterktry:te,thp drignedang requesting him to resign
mil ..here mod, ma ow ,•01en the vs* from the deka.
dant.l His.last 1110/OPO WWW .didiviwed in December,
1882 and in Jannary, 1864 i he delivered what he
termed • supplementary mask amount. Mere this be
had made no *int &gar . :Us accounts were
thew planed in tha hands - Ate. Hidwell, ,aocourstent
At this time I had no ,ediat there was anything
wrong. Via one ormeplaeu. I histrected ldr. Burnett,
if he saw anything ezeggsgpind in say emounte, to let
me know. He wrote to ace that the expenditure for
my slablas for bone alimedest li7oo a-year. This was
so monstrous Hiatt= . mapimenr, A , did not
get any distket in ,the state of the amounts
i
till the spring of lash year,..,,,, ter Mr. Bidwell had ex-
amined the apoonnts,a Immo than was made to mieby
Meseta. Dexter and Co., my solicitors. In sonsequenee,
Mr. Runiphreys wee , oonsalted,. and I have been acting
wirier then combined advise. I find heard of a clam
against me by thie4Fisener in ;April, .1864, and even-
tually he fild e a , An' Chanemy egainakme. After
my asnnuntellita hcfn„ricliiad. lay attention wee mi 114.,.
by one of my toneats,,pained tt, .who had rented
in Ma man] Ylislirel lie , Old. Down F
Id. etahlre, at a rent of ,e-leer. A 99Vn.9":1
~,,
pa had been midst. me. nor a*nt warm
.armg lost some sheep. :At . time these
;iron
rir:iar of rent due to me from ti, lel mime
venation with prisoner, '1 said, forgive pin't
eto press him in his *welt% The armActuka the
sneer, 4 think, wee gotti :e et. Tee,., heard from
receivedteisoner thl'a ar of
Pent from Targett,, s
not did I lind any trace or it in the
'Leen.,nlp°lli*? under nIY hollao. After the
gore In ' had II nivesistated, a commhxdostien was
mad to me V the subject of 'rtisOut. Aii far as I
know the`trid.. has never been paid my aoooint. •
.11ir: coin' cod tpjzvite diary, f din prisoner's
,eltOnme, at iropAapprehension.
:ever san mkt -Ail'af,
t 446 tie to ‘ 06,
1.411-31.:7d. in the orisoierli
,; hA ink
lesi ib' 'ie Via. ' The • i lopei:
accounted for. In anottrerboOlr Of `Vraa , h
in ittentristea limittirriting, "The - Imre
arsits4i
?entente 66 itinet'dity order at Losib btry•
fir eceinqMinee ofthor ' kin annaln f 0
'tif r.teeris :In i M'. Waters
wiiiliiial°tos"r4o46,obOof 214000.5 yeai ;n4l my fattiest
Militia Efii alto Ataileed stie Parton ti and run*
tlllwtinti adrre tenth. ' !don't thinkift lretord ma.
out Out le4=*ititii 'to thd'amount,
oeftelffeis year: • It 0. , Mii itiabuthemente
triCittealttrutir , hes hair's _ .. 'out of mosey
~r Snide.. Welt -the year 1855 ,
1* " *flowed to draw lii ,lii -certain amount
near -SW • *oboes* at 'llissidtord, but that
he•IIMISTed to &eta from ea r .....$ , .
*row mom* The ' ...tr; . ' os
defile& .VralettUtin,odt lrr pot 4,,
, - It 4 ••
=teitie"" ' ' it,' •
,'' ?., 'fri,l, .
ourk
1ei1.14 11". . Mint .
suitileattit I is'
ateougne of lenitefeml. tedantr. , 4. ; ,
.. :I t
balirtheArook *et hoi ' I'
Of -, I
vblst on
„ , ,

.....
8rizz1.m....„........
1 i
,542.
.1,4
.0, , VI _
rioi,CA.
vo. ~,,k,•• • •
~ , ;
,„‘„, zip,„u-,-
,—• ii • -ql' 47 •':% ..4---$1: MIIIV
_y .. . mitri-r-r- vt.OLI 1