The Dorset County Express and Agricultural Gazette.
Dorchester, Dorset, England, 1882-10-17 00:00:00

oancnors—utroamAc xoncss.

Josiah Attwooll was objected t), on the ground of
parochial relief.—Mr. Bowen mid the notice stated
the person had had relief within a twelvemonth, from
15th July, 1882, which wee immaterial.—Mr. Ar 'en
urged that the notice WSllB,lffi ient, as it stated within
• twelvemonth, from the 15th July, 1882.—Mr. Vi.;or
said Mr. Bowen was tight, the notice should have
said "previous to" 1511 July, 1882, or "from 15th
July, 1881.—Mr. Arden, contesting Mr. Bowen, add
if a person had to pay rent "from " any time, he
would not pity it before—The Barrister held Mr.
Bowen WM right, an 1 disallowed the objection. —Mr.
Arden sail if the Intention were clear, as the Barrister
admitte I he asked him to amend; but Mr. Vigor
replied that the intention must be clearly expressed.
Mr. Arden said the Barrister w • going to retain the
name, although the man bad perish relief.—Mr.
Bowen said Mr. Arden asked the Barrister to strike
the name off, when there was not a proper objection.
—The Barrister held the contents of the notioe of
objection were modem He should not strain the
power to knock any man's name off.—Vote retained.
Bowering, John, objected to by Mr. Arden on the
ground of parish B wen asked that the
notice be put in.—ObjecUon withdrawn.
Brewer, John, withdrawn also.
Cheverella, James Welter, objected to by Mr.
Arden.—On the notice being pot in. it was for pariah
relief within twelvemonths of 15th Jely, 1882.—This,
It war held, would do.—Mr. Bow= tried to resist, on
the ground of the spelling of the name; but there was
no doubt about the man.—Vote lost.
Cole, George: John; Collins, Chattel;
Collett, George; Coroick, George; and Near Jim/Ott;
objected to by Mr. Arden, were struck off. Silas
Knott, inaufficient residence, struck off, as was James
Lovell; Samuel hisrahallsay, objection withdrawn.
Jacob Stevens, • voter objected to by Mr. Arden,
sustained his vote, and the voter asked for costs, which
Mr. Arlen paid, amid • laugh.
Hermann Teener, objected te by Mr. Arden, on the
I ground of his being an alien, was defended by Mr.
Bowen.—Mr. Lee, Jon., swore he was • foreigner, and
Mr. Tatzner was struck out.

—ii'r;;ci—e-fhi-sii-e,--CotTe-ctad-to by Mr. Arden, for mon-
melamine, was retained, Mr. Tooke proviog the rale
did 'tot talcs place till some time after the

Frederic Charles, and Clark, John, were
put on, but Collins, John, left off for parish relief.
Alfred Temple Tebbitt, Radipole, did not get his
vote, through residence not being sufficiently proved.
Mr. Bowen remarked that in all his claims he had
claimed for municipal vote. am well as for puha-
szvimee.7 ones, but the other side had only claimed for
parliamentary en^a. He understood that where there
was no claim for the rueololpet vote, the names were
not put on the municipal Ilst.—The Barrister said this
was SO.

-In-C;nclusion, Mr. Arlen and Mr. Bowen expressed
their thanks to the Revising Barrister for the
courtesy Trcsteed, and which they always received,
from him.
The Barrister acknowledged the compliment, stating
that they gave him very litUe trouble, in fact no trouble
at ell.

The results ire as follows :
BADIPOLL

The Conservatives made three new iolger claims ;
of these two were to amend the descriptions of old
lodger voters, and one was a fresh claim, and WM
sustained. In the householders' List the Conservatives
made three claims, sustained two, and lost one. In
the same list the Liberals made three claims, sustained
two, and lost one.