The Dorset County Express and Agricultural Gazette.
Dorchester, Dorset, England, 1867-04-23 00:00:00

WIMBORNE.

DIA= OF M. Pewee Rill/Kn.—This esteemed
gentleman. who !kw moire than half • minor, bag
boos the iadreebe of youth in this town,
was culled to bin rest on Mouday lb inst. at the
good old ap of 84 yaws. He woe the founder of
Wonky= mothodiam in this town, and his boon its
chief sopport. He laboured amongst the denomina•
tion as a local primmer. In respire to hie ineasory
several of the wadreinim partially closed thar shop
windows, and • deep feeling of moat at his Imo is
felt by all wh• had the Omani of being aocinaintud
with Ma

Wlll3Ollllll COUNTY COURT, Amu. ITTR.

(Before B. Evsarre, ENO

- •
There were 157 original plaints entered for bearing,
several adjourned ease; sad 10 istagineat suminonree.
Of the former • large proportion were settled oat of
seri The defeaded dame were as Wows
P. Yonag.--Claire a 100. 94.—Tbe plaintiff
asdosr, readies la Windsors*, sad had several caries
before the Cant, A. greater part being undefended and
allows& VS debts wore etatteoas4 hiring the life.
tim. at his husband. Yr. Tanner, ea defendant's part,
banded in tenni ressipted WI.. whieh ware dgoed by
sag Haver, twe meg nee in her bastweit's
...JD,. wag by whoa the geode were delivered.—Flie
Mair pre judgment for the deteadant, wimarlima
that them _k be did not believe the pl.iattir iisdnieerrei
the noway y 44 it was albs dear that ease oe• had. It
wits A mad I sees, and he isoneidrred the
plaintiff aught to trees Ite earner, as. or far as he could
see. there were gnus& foe proesediam in a admit.,

—Leis e. Fronk. —Ohio ia id.—This wee •
Or• last, sag his Hero= gm •'d Mt for
isetbac the
3651 11. O. &Mitt.. —Claim 21 Ifie. Id. -42 tid4 eon
tb.uda •ere *Maimed by deforde•t% yds Woe
Deleolent reiniltied the eta." but skid ihm
when he !serried tis, detendent he wAs INA swag. that
him owed the siosey.—His Elmwer very Libils
sok bet 100 au • Ifabisall•rroeil hi. on the &wenn
—Violist toe poi "
Siirr £d'.. 'ha Ban' AL—Chbial Si.helium toe
• MAL—Plant', eine thea L. Kay. 18.4 be
mid a
"sielesi isetienernti" welled • Sets, to the olifis4ent
tor 21 pia gl et the thee of doling end N,id
k• *Aid ern PV as thas *so sl6:mirignaar. The
wanes was swat rAlL—Defeadiat be Ewer wad
no pay ft., esd '444 ide sib who 441,41 bM..

thil *half brought the dale sbe told Ids het himilend
left curd be would sit Ike more than • envereiga
Plankt might have the late art a giving bask
the —His Homier said tlre "'U-
NIONS as defendant's who h demand that
el was the meant allied to ea paid for the gate. Be
mud thereon, give a verdist far the defendants.
Metal IPlismmer n H. Osmond. —Claim?pr keep of
an heifer. —The plaintiff is the landlord of tbi c
and Horses, Wiinborne, and the defendant a dealer.—
Mr. Moors aerated for the defendant —Plaintiff stated
that in Deniable lest be sold defeedant an heifer for
CIL Hs 'greed to some after it in two or thine days.
The bugalu Ira made in the passim ef his daughter,
who lØsd tha agreemeat in defesilant's book.—His
Rosiotr to defendant : Ham yoeMi. hoax—A. "80.
did NM think be bring math 16 plaintiff:
"Is year daughter beer—Plaintiff said she was not,
bet he could used for bor.—His Honour: If we And we
shall reeding b*, y0u....- dub. defendant did not
come fitot the heifer be wrote to bun, and reeeired a
reply on the 21st December, 1866, is whish defendant
said he would come for it, and pay the keep for over-
time. He kept the heifer 14 weeks, and then sold her
to Mr. Chided another stealer. He had no farther com•
maniation with the defendant after the trot letter.
He waited • week, but defendant did not oome.—The
defense was that there wee no aetnel deal sued.. Derooed
Mating that be was in the tolls of Wimberne with
another pence Eased Host Ou prolog plaintiff's
Any w the beam. Rant said he would MN
arijam ma
el Mauna said be could halm It. As Mr. Hunt
sada net some (or it he (defendant) toll Plummer he
would min for it. The bergan with Hunt wee made
on 4th December. On the Ind morning in January he
went to Hr. Plummer's about • guar it to eight. No
eve was op, and he Gould me nothing of the heifer.—
Hie Honour, In snmaidesdp, pointed mak that the letter
resolved fresh detesdant by the. plaintiff fully Proved
that be waslb. party who agreed to pandas:is the heifer,
anlor."4.Vmhtrimsd e."(:. Plain" Ibis "eismes Plaintiff
said he sent • sages to the defendant that be should
withdraw the sue. Defendant said he had u re.
caved such nett and spelled for his day's espenme.—
• In reply to Mai , plaintiff meted that his reason for
witbdrawing the claim was to put in at the next mart
for the whole amount doe on two amicsenta. Defendant
thee produced various reeelptod bills, NOM of the Items
In which and been transferred to the DOW eseoent. —His
Honour pointed this out to the plaintiff. and somenbat
ornsimed him for endeavouring to show they lyr. not
tbs same, as ths date, sad sum onximpoodeL
lemleat was ellewed his e
Weiland v. J. Altiely7—ititis was also • olaiin for
attinci Van —Defendant rated that be never ordered
Nem He always paid fee what be had. Several
orders for goods were beaded in signed in defendant's
came. Defendent said he never authorieed any one to
give the orders. He then stated he was a married man,
bet had not lived with his wife for many years.—Tbe
ease was then adjourned by eansent, for the attendance
of defendant's h•asebesnar.

lslesiZ Rolls—This was an anion to recover
po
on of • bone. The plaintiff, who is • labourer
of Alderholt, was represental by Mr. Tanner, and Mr.
Moore appeared for the defendant, a bricklayer of the
same plaos. The following °video.. Irma given —Henry
the plalutiff, said he lived at Alderholt, and
smelly worked on the roods. On the 29th January
lest the defendant mine to his house about half.put
seven in the morales and said he wanted POW. send
hauled. He replied he could not& it as be had no hoese,
and as be owed defendant 26e. on an old hone be would
mirage to send some rest day. Defendant then mid
"Bailey, has thee not got the money to pay for the
hone. He told him he load not, but be was going to
have a horse in a day or two from a Mr. Jefferks.
Rolls then said, "I don't mind lending thee the money
10 have the hone, when will you ray me r He replied
In • fortnight. Rolls then said he would lend him the
money; the pries was to he £3. Defendant said he
would bey the horse and then plaintiff mould boy it °aim.
On the same day Rolls wanted • load of sand hauled.
The horse was theo in my esstody in my stable. On
the 911 February Rolls sent for me and wanted to know
what my scoottot was against him for hauling said.
We then settled up for the old horse. My son George
was with me. Rolls than lashed " When are you going
to nay for the other honor I replied in a day or two.
I offered him a sovereign and 900 farm fano% worth
about 10c. Fie said "Bailey, pot the sovereign in
you pocket till you aan make up the money to £3. I
saw him agent on the followles Wednesday morning
He then said he waisted the mosey for the hors.. I
told him I would pm hint about twelve o'clock. I was
mains to Ford inglwidge to take some mosey for funs.
He could come with me if he liked and I would pay
him. About half-rest twelve he again met me at my
wicket-gate, and asked me again to pay. I said I could
no. till I had been to Fortingbri. The horse mac
then a short distance off with • loed. Defendant went
and "hatched" it out one side, and! "hatched" it in. We
then bad a scuffs. At lan he got the horse out and
took it away. In eromeramination plaintiff said he
was under a contrast to haul • certain quantity of san I
from Alebrholt to the Gee Works at Fordingbridge.
He was unable to carry out the contrast through the
death of his old hone. —Q, Did not the defendant say
he would buy the horse aed lend It to you to complete
the hauling of the sosid.—A. The defendant did not, at
any time, say melds' about lending me the hone I
was not Ito may anything for theta, of the out. The
harness was my own. After soon further roes-
stamination, in which plaintiff positively declared the
hone was not lent to his. George Ridley, his son, a lad
14 Years of age, who mid be had been four years to
school, was called. Is reply to his Houton as to the
nature of an oath, be said if be did not speak the truth
they would lose thee.., and be appeared totally ignorant
as to the punishment for telling a felbelpvit. 1111
Humour therefore refused to take Ids evidence.
Plaintiff's wife was thou Galled, and corroborated her
husband's statement as to the sanyereation in their
house on the DM February, and to some worthsn of the
converaatiou at the wicket-gate on the following day.—
Mr. Moore, for the dahmadom, mid their answei to this
plaint wee that the plaintiff agreed to haul 46 hied/ of
sand from Alderbolt to Fordinsbridge. Whilst the
work was in proves., planers old horse, on whisk be
owed defendant £3. died, and be was not therefore able
to fulfil ht. contaret. Defendant then bought a hone of
• Mr. Jr:Aerie% and agreed to tend it to the plaintiff;
the amusement being that if the plaintiff could pay for
It at a enisin time the hone was to be his, but not
otherwise.— His Honour: The simple question is this
cam ia whether the bargain wee an absolute or • coo-
didonal ons—Mr. Moore then called the defendant,
*ho Mated that the agreement between himself and
the plaintiff was that he was to haul 46 loads of sand
from A lderholt to Fordingbridge for what he owed on
the old hone. He only bulled 24 loads, and then sold
the old bons.—His Honour: I understood from
plaintiff that the old horse died—Mr. Moore: So the
plaintiff stated but it was not ow—Defendant : (eon.
tinned) Plaintiff mold not then complete the metre*,
I went to him and asked him when ahe could. He said
some day neat week. I told him it mutt be done at
once, said suggset.d be should buy Mr. Jefferles horse.
He mid be could not manage it, he had no mosey. I
asked him if he had not got a s.,veraimi He mid
"No." I then lathed him if I ut the horse for him
whether be would fulfil the contract, Re replied be
would. He than agreed to meet me at tends, &block,
but did not, and I beget the hone of Mr. Janie" for
£3. I.ent the hone home after • load of and. He
saw flailey In the Market-plaoe, at Fordinglitidge, who
asked him if hew., to have the horse. I replied, I
will loud it to you for one week, and when that week 45
no if you bring me £3 the horse is yours; if not, mine.
Joseph Frampton was present and beard the ecieventa,
boo. Pldetiff consented to take the Wiese on there
conditions. When we settled or the Saturday there
WS4 • balance of tld. die cis the old horse. I then told
him I should take the bones. the °entreat WM Slashed.
He replied, "Don't be so hard," and pot • sovereign
down, and asked me to let him keep the hone till Tues-
day. I replied, "Corry home the 'menden, put two
with it, and bring the three to me, and then the horse is
yours." On Wednesday I sent Mark Bailey for my
horse. The plaintiff same, sad said he could get the
money by one o'clock. About two, I watt to the
defendant's home ; the hone wee about 1)0 yards from
the beak door. I told him I was going to take my
horse. I went snd "hatehed" it out of the cart on one
side, and whilst I was unfastening the other Bailey's
boy "hatched" it in main. A senile ensued, and I mot
Joseph Ross for the police. Daring hie 'bathos g d
possomion of the horse, which I sold to Mr. Hopkins
sheet a week or • fortnight afterwardt for £4 184. -By
Mr. Tanner n I bought the bares shoot three hours
before I ea* the plaintiff of Sefferies, and paid him for
' It the same time.—Jomph Frampton, • bricklayer, fully
soninsed defesdent's stmemest sate tbeconverassim in
the Marketmnare, at Fordingbridge.-111Lark Bailey, is
the employ of the defendant, said: I was present when
tap master boaeht the horse of defferies. Hs told me
logo to A Iderbolt for a load of sand. When I jot to
the plaintiffs' stable, and was petting the Maness on.
Bailey atone to me sad said busboy was to go with the
load. Thu both went, and when they got to Fording.
bride" the other boy was sent swim and I went for a
Load of poles, and from thanes he Baibrrs Muse with
tin horst I bad enters to lean the horse there.—
Sophia Rolls, wife of the defendaat, : I was present
on the nasurday ..lban the amount was "staled between
my husband and the plaintiff. Bailey offered my her
bent a sovereign on the hors,. My bacteria said he
would not take it, mid told him to pet it in bis pockct
and bring three. He then offered It to me, but
refused to take it. He then mid he did not think we
ahoald be so hard aa to take the horse, and asked my
husband Inlet limey fill Tuesday. My husband weed,
and as tho_plaintlff wee 1.0104 out ha said, "Wall, we
will soy Woctoo•day Inonting."—Mr. Tanner baying
shortly oross-examieed this withen, hit Honour SUalm.el
no, remarking that the contract was either an simulate
or • conditional on., He then pointed out that this
evidenee, from Int to last, proved It we, a moditional
ame. Those conditions were, "You bring as three
sovereigns,
eand the bone is yours." Not ose statement
In the evidneo showed that the plaintiff had anything
to do with the pertness of the second bona.—Verdbm
for defendant with all meth
J Goall sG. Iltoek.—Cialim £3 6e. Bd. This was
an application, supported by Mr. Moore, for • new
Irbil, on the ground that theses there was a rimming
onemmit whin hod been tootracted prior to 16158, ems
thin permute had been made upon it 1. 1862 and 1.663,
erhitti took It out of the Statute of Limitations.
Woodcut's wife predated a remitted amount, and
Positively declared she had lad no goods since the date
of he reseipt bet what she had paid for. The old lady
owed some amusement by stating that she had been a
mother to the plaintiff, sepal leg him with fruit and
vegetables whenever he mem fres of sod.— His Honour
gun her the alternative ef either compering the two
Imlocnate by the next Court-du, or haring • Wanton,
Misinat her; and on her refusing to look over them,
mmie en "dor for Palmist at ls. per week.
Jetsamy floingolitho.—Tbere were en lodgment
ell tessonea—W. Goodfellow v. Clark.—The desdant
la this as. Is servant to the Remiss Authemeder, and
his Rawer staled that both an ambassador and bb ser-
van% were free front arrest. He therefore adjourned
the sue to ItiVe plaintiff an opportunity of imam out
if debodant had a separate establielunent.
In Yerilman, besimapt. —This earie liss bees
bet Court several MAIM Os the lest mession
Mr. Moen, who appeared for the meditate, oppiteed,
and the case was adjourned for the neodaeeg.e el an
seeming book. This was sow prodseej In Mr. Tamar,
who appeared in as of the bankruA —Mr. Ikon
thal sielsomod cisd Mated tUt defeedant's
father bed so• bees ethaekted.—lfis Honour, the
Benticsr's Clerk, Mr. Tantee, aes the sax
proved that he bed, wed the beekrupt's order of dim
elsaggo was grsabst

BL A N DFO RD.
Abkrusren Iserscrton. —The mead
Ues of the flth Dorset Rifle Volunteer; by Asti=
Barrett, took plaoe in the corn es~, os
Tassdny lest, between 30 and 40 being present.
esnipany was pat through a variety of pavements
which ante very fairly done, and appsered to give
satisfaction.

BREACH OF THE 801100011 BYE LAWL—Joba
Churchill, of Blandford, pleaded gailty to placing in
Orchard...tree. a quantity of Maw" and IBOWiEg it
to be it.,. beypod the smelled. tilos. The ohmic
was heard oti Wednesday, the 17th instant, by the
Mayor and W. C. Ploobas, Esq., who iallioted a
penalty of ea., and bo. costa.
Basaltic° WINDOW& —Oa Thorn:W. the 18thi
before the Mayor and W. C. Fineham, Esq., Thomas
Gould, of Blandford, was brought up in custody,
charged with wilfully breaking two panes of glass,
and injuring a lattice blind, it. pioperty of Mr. .1.
R. Belly's. Mr. Relives stated be was in his parlour
the previous evening, and saw the prisootr come and
deliberately knock both hie fists through the window.
Two panes were broken and the inside blind inpred.
The damage was estimated at Ba. 84. Prisoner
pleaded guilty. The Mayor sad it was most die.
granefol 0 indoot, and seatenoed him to sig weeks'
bud Laver.

CsArsi.—The anniversary services
in connection with this chapel took plan on Friday
last, and were well attended. In the afternoon an
eloquent sertbon was preached by the Rev. J. B.
Boosor, of Bub, from St. John 12 chap., 31 and 32
verses. About 200 set down to an excellent tea in
the Amicably Rooms at 5 o'clock. In the evening a
public meeting was held, when the chair was taken
by Mr. A. 8. Hodges, and addressee delivered by
the Revs. Mr. Vims and Mr. Bousor, Mews. Jack.
son, Young, and Barnet. The meeting was one of
the most soooessful that has been held for a bog
time past. Collections was made on behalf of the
trust fund.
LOCAL HOARD. —Tim monthly meeting of the
Load hoord was held on Wednesday. Tremont :
Mr. Darden (chairman). Menem Hodges, Park,
Abbott, Groves, Maiden, Lindsay, Eyere, Gill,
Smith, Johns, Ball, and Manville. —Ordered that the
Surveyor inspect the premises of Mr. W. B. Green,
I. Abbot-street, and report as to the stets of the
prince—Resolved that the Clerk write to the • .1.
Unn, calling his Mention to the large arrears of
General District Rates, and requesting that such
arrears be got in before the net nieeting.—Tbe
Highways Committee reported that they bed ad-
vertised for tenders for the road scrapings, and had
received one from 111 r. Charles Pond, of £l2, and one
from Mr. John Godwin, of £5 10a, and they re-
oommended that Mr. Pond's tender be accepted.—
Resolved that such report be accepted.
HUsPICTeD BURGLARY. —OO Wednesday morning,
as the servants of the Rev. J. R. Quirk came down
from their bedrooms, they found the dining room
and kitchen shutters unfastened, and the windows
partly opened. As they bad all been fastened on
the previous night, it was as one suspected that
some one had broken into the house, and on looking
about this suspicion appeared to be oonfirmed. •
large piece of bacon wee found cut and put in •
clothes basket, and some pieces of plate were put
into a large case, as if intended to be carried off
There did not, however, it appear to have been
anything removed from the house. The police
were at once communicated with, and Superintendent
Watts closely inspected the premises, after which he
impressed his opinion that the boon had not been
broken into, there being no signs of violent)e to he
found anywhere, and that what was done was dose
by some one in the bongs. At present the matter
appears shrouded in mystery.
Divunon•L Perry Simons, April 20th.—
Present The Lord Portman, J. J. Farqubareon,
and W. P. Okeden &qrs.
Gall. Tazorssa.LJohn Hook, of Stiekland, was
eharged with tresspating in search of game, cm leads in
the occupation of the Baron flambee on the NM Mena
last.—Rs pleaded not guilty.--George Rona, keeper,
mid that about half.paat six o'clock in the awning of
the day named he heard the report of a gun in the
lower part of Houghton wood, near Broeklin gate. On
looking up be saw Hook lowering a gun from his
shoulder, but in consequence of the smoke he ooeld not
see whether he shot snything. On seeing him Hook
rin oft through the higher wood. He did not Sod • y•
thing near the Spot where the gun was tired.—Defen.
dant denied being near the place, and called as witness
Aaron Pitman, who state 1 that they were working
together all day and left off work at 6 o'clock. He
knew that was the time as the work-people from Edge.
end was on before them. sad they always left work at
6 o'clock. When they got to Stialsed they wen
together to Mr. Aliens, and had • quart of ale, which
witness paid for.--The Chairman ftid as It was • one of
oath spinet oath the Bench would adjourn it to give
the defendant an opportunity of profiting Mr. Alin of
anyone in his house on the evening in question to
smarm Pitmans statement. —Adjourned till 16th

Hay.
A flait CASE OF YOUTHFUL DEPRAVITY —A lad
earned "Award Bernet, rending In Blendford, ws6
itbarW, Fritts being drank and riotous in the street..
H. nWsded aunty. In answer to the chairman Kr.
Stmt. Watts said that lb. befendent was a sad
character. He used his poor soother very ili. and only
lately pre her • pair of Week eves. The Ch.ironan
said that be richly deserved to be sent 1 wool id once,
and to be well dowsed, but the 3 would give his.. chance,
and teed him 2a. sod 'oda on seven days' imprison-
ment. . _ .

HIGHWAY 011/131CW1 Maidment, Walter
Cunard, and George Paul, were seyerelly charged with
malurfully committing • breach of the Highway Act,
by chewing their hnrees to feed by the road ride in
Shaftesbury lane.-11eldmeot and Coward pleaded
that they were driving the horses bef.re them, and
Paul that he wee not the owner.—The Bench decided
that as the place in question was private property the
summons must be dismissed, at the same time caution-
ing defendants that the pity who rented it could
probed ageing them.— Bridle was charged with •
similar offerors committed in the perish of Langton.—
Chic &mired on the saute grounds se the last.—
William Coward was then charged with leaving • horse
and out unattended in Seliaburstreet, Bleu 'ford.
Defendant admitted the offence, bat pleeded that he
was bargaining for the sale of • donkey—lined Li. and
cute 9c—To be paid In a week.
DAMAGING • PRSOL—Charles Adams and Henry
Ambrose Ferret. of Tollard Farnham) were charged with
wilfully end maliciously destroying a ream the property
of Lord Rivers, at Toll•rd Farnham. —Mr. Harvey,
his leedebies steward, appeared to support the informa-
tion, ant Mr. Johns, of Riogwood, for the defendants.
The fact of destroying the fume wee not disputed but
Mr. Johns submitted that big clients claimed the right
of eettinc turns on the part of the common which bed
been partially eorticeed, they were not liable to prosecu-
tion for deetroying that which bad been put up to her
them from their rights. Thbe rights bad been enjoyed
upward. of sixty years and he dad not think Mr. Harvey
could Mow any cause to eel them aside.—Mr. Johns
also stated that he Wee tampered to predates proofs that
showed the right claimed by the defendants were bum
ftde rights.—Mr. Harvey beerever, denied the existence
of such rights. —The Bench were of opinion that the
defendants title to the debt• claimed, as shown by Mr.
Johns, ousted their jurisdiction I and therefore dismissed
the ease, at the tame time advising tbe defendante to
. .

Aid yet you ask a sovemign foe the @Mailing room of
SO itslcli yes yr at N. I—Defeedent seta be bad
• Pat shafts but dilly ware not yet on the
,_,•614•;71111 Ithethr then pee a vordiet for the
11...ntin for 104., which wad not to be shamed if he
*Wined fewaserdoe of Oa putt& —Reber!. Domino, e.
Williams Woolley, 01. in £l3 12.. 100. for butcher's
meat Both parties resth in 'Sandford .—Mr. Atkinson
appeared hr the OAPS, and stated that he bad
remind a letter from live defendant's solicitor offering
ss, in the & This BM his sleet sod whoa of the
emitters sonsidthed was too lAtin nor believed tb•
defendant coeld pey Mr. Atitheon then peed
over a list of the ersth sad the liabilities In which
the plaintiff's munsont impel down as £105.. 10d., and
said he believed his 00501 owed about the amount of
the difference between the two sums to the defendant.
—Rim Honour mid as Mere was no setacff claim.' the
bed way would b., not to notice that. He then told
the plaintiff it was a matter for hie merlons oonaideration
whether Ise would press for the full &amount He then
inquired who were the defendant'o solicitor.. rind being
informed Moses. Vinclam sod Salim, of Blandford,
said he would give an order for payment in 14 days'
Probably eons. arrangement imolai be made by tlist
ti(oo.'Strange v. Paldock.—This was an epplieation
to recover po.session obt oottage.—Both pa is are in
the receipt of parnehial relief, the plaintiff as an inmate
of Bturminster Dolma house, and the defendant as an
outdoor pauper.-11r. Atkinson, who appeared for
the defendant, aoknoeledeed the tenancy, but
atathi th•l his Oka bad not received the proper
notices to quit. His Hononr, who at a former court bed
given a judgme.t for 1..$ for rent, then held that the
tenancy Wl• • yearly one, and that the defendant bad a
claim for six months' notice; no such eetiee bud been
riven. A eopy of the agreement of hiring was then
pat in. Him Honour ihquired for the original agreement.
Plaintiff said that Mr. Thorne had it and further that
be held it because be bad advanced him money to marry
on the prothedinga. His Honour, after inquiring as to
where the original title ht .& were, nod ordain •
search to be made for them adjourn. I the ease for the
attendance of Thorne to produce the original agreement,
—Jualounut flusensooosts. —C. Hishman v. C
In this ease a judgment IVY obtained two yesrs ago,
Defendant Row agreed to pay ss. by the following
Saturday and the net by two imitalments.—His Hollow
warned him not to fail lo doing so, for if the debt was I
not paid by nest court day an order for imprisonment
would be i.sued.—Thototh Rowland w clamp
Hayward. —The debt for which the defendant wee
summoned was c intended in 1861. An order for
payment wag than made. Defendant now denied owing
the money, or receiving any summons.— His Honour
said he must have dome on, and told him if he did nee
onions to the order, namely. to Pay the claim. not
half at the end of • month, and th • otthr at the end of
another month, he would send him to prison for 28
days.—lnkpen v. P•I•OOM Pike.—Plaintiff said he had
received the whole of the deht. He now applied for
meta, amounting to CI 9., Order for payment of coats
granted, in delimit 14 dap' imprisooment