The Dorset County Express and Agricultural Gazette.
Dorchester, Dorset, England, 1870-03-15 00:00:00

lORSET COUNTY EXPRESS AND AG

he rye But I keep ap my *trite, and hope wenething tenet weteid dell with their Iwidenthcs gerklawnt,
wry
turn up for the best." espeemion, "a Fronds
couri here adlostrned.
:d, ioU
detail.
On the Judge eating for date., Titrattoir. :reshd.ale
matedianon
jenser" when,,nohbe.a4Loint,th=b' rerlectid bec'll Yuo"o
to dinholiovo 'he
Mr. Cracknell olaerred. in the intended hill defendant ant. I. tiler eircionetanees,
dated the aliegetion of information of his wife to Muth, and immoral mistreat whim she dente. them on oath. tTh
fnetiori you are to dithel_
eietvetrthe
...ththathh nautrPolltahltY.c7,lXmatmodentifrotivit,toontived,ttileiitorth ittrstwithittlncoatinte-
betliitngthers.itth.amlldenadotZtittedutgadutul.teiry.:Xtrowttbe Matt.
wthllecemibetyrel
muniestion with Pollay to put a apy upon Ws wife. The dreg Myth Ind rmidenee le the Mem hoes* enOtiononalY froth th
liter to Pollaky misdated the 14th February, and In it he eatl,
be" be
Izitllhitteell;unhdpen
tit •;,tut utmorytn the matter I.letthrotejay=l;yhouLtdhet.ndwertti tthhod:
on Saturday, the Ind Fe ."
De d
his agent at Paris was inn high offlciThal 'odpu P°tlonliak, hietc.dillhano't facimabirlitieeker' theanicumtheloaDd birn itruniriultery in
th:ttr 127:: w'rill
ihtt
underworld English law, and he suggest+ that Mr Weston, the a colour did that give to the transaction. In the intermediate
lawyer, thuold go over to France. sle Som nu elied
P`rl`• es. an •
thew-then there, and there a more powerful machinery mon both elbakawat hi:lndtrafter, berlie.nthod th^rigtg a showedtntecone
than the law for obtaining eeldence-vla, gold, and that I. set was irroddible. They had nark no Intimation of • chants of
wantlog In thin matter on the pert of the defendant. I have I Immoral conduct against the huly'amaid, end had even them
elated the defence in chief of Mr.. Watteau met othfirsed to the no opportunity of rebetting it. Her mistreat said, I took her
abort eM•lavit I reel. In reply to that Mhers were Med, end Iwo my seek* before I had received her charecter. after-
in reply tothom Mrs. Weston died an affidavit in October, 18110. wards received bar chancier and found she had left by tenon
She states In that the particulars of her going to Boulogne, 14 her immoral conduct with non. She seemed a totelnl good
and of her •Ohig With MI. Quiet to the Chate tu Beau doeities. .441 of we. ant, and we hoped separation would reform her.
She says she is &dented that the circuntstanceo prior to the If they were right In theiraavomption, that adultery took Or*
mparatlon are .1 hen Immaterial to the suit, and that the in the dr•t 'aerial of her ourke, the sort of lads's-maid ent-
is lit no way bound to anour them. She add. :-- ployel was yam- well adapted for lter purpo.e. Leullette felt
oleo...see to ,indicate, of my own character, thus thdal- In Ime-4 -why beesuee of her summed criminal intercouree
reedy selected,' am &olion to declare, which I hereby do, with the groom. But she Is taken back again by the elnie
that the various •fildayite pointing to Ade of Impromiety on my mistremintn her sertire two yearo atter, who, a scowl Ilmati
part, ere tither untrue or wilfully. dietrated." didn't consider the lady's maid at all un.uitesi to her itemise -
Mr. Jew' Perhaps d will stmetnn the matter if I say Olt a Itigular comae for a lady to take whom purity WAD beyond
end» allot/Miamian, ilinied pointsblenk b MYs. Neaten and all queetion-rmt at all Angular if they thought the was w-
ide. Quirk. The defetvant hee hal the benefit of cr quelnted with her mistreat'e faults liut auother einsular fee
etanitnatlon. He hi•ti,tight it right to severe' v cross-ex...lw wax that when the rite Went down on her knee. end b
his wife by inspeelal examiner for two days-I never honed of LIM lot Mored her to eve up Qukk and to return tnrce-d r
meth i thing. children, saying the he&red her husband would fond. e her.
Mr. Cracknell She doted all the Incriminatory pert of the Mr.. Memoc, doe, not oeny that statement. She denies the
charges. Thera'. the hardkerchim story _said to he found in • mamma:it of Leullette thet she left In consequence of what
Mr. Qitiek's bedroom-owl, that is denied. Then there it the . was going on. What would hove been the course taken by
evidence of Philliberte Melai, who plaintiff mid we,. discharged • lady Merest purity when her maid took such • course. She
for drunkennees--disharged weratits both amend Leullette ! would have mid, get out of the house you Yetra,Ond ;
Mr. Brown : It in not denied that Leuliette wait diacharg'ed. have no more to do with you. But she tel... to persuade her to
The Judge And it Is not dented th it she went down on her Woe. 'rust is not all. lir. Quick is communicated with- toki
knees to her mistress. That WY opened tie mem • pert of her what the humid.
dramatic performance. Mr. Jew! : IC. all wrong. She wie discharged on the'P'L
Vr. Crecknell : She aye that the threw herself on her knees Sir R. B wally Add laullette stated that her mistress :
to Mrs. Weston, but she did net tell hotels. wan In communiem "She knew, after all that had been said and done, her clank-
tiest with Mr. Pollaky. The maintill denim the Ilanlielm and ter was gone, and the could not and woold not gin' up Quick."
Bonn stories That the told her he would do se he had done to otber•-thet
Mr. !cool : liylrleesdllr R. Bagelly mys he abandons that he'd desert her, that he eould not help her for he had nO
part of the case ; the whole ,4 that I. untrue. money; and tbe Implored her to ere him up. She mid she
The Judge : It tholes how little reliance can be placed on could not and would not that eke told her what Quick had
tint sort el teetim-ny. done with all the • omen he had had before- had turned them out
Mr. Jeawil :It show. what it-nee...eft will swear to. Theism, naked; to which plaintiff miO, the knew all that, they were
nol, to blame ; they get •omatiy franto if they can Identify the eels who had ima of money, and it did not matter at all. Ile
parties. an.l nothing If they can't. See what a came this might admitted that a great dell of this was denied: but the se-
bum made &donut cot membered her going down on her knees. She denied her •I-
Mr. Cracknell said When they got the German affidavits t his inure nem with other • omen, and Maw other
no dates were most bey mut the eummerof lees They *potted tbitig. ; het there we. tto dental of the fort, that the lerY,nt
for date., and the time wan fined between 58th July. sr( "Ph id a lady, ,shoos he am irked to believe pure, modest, and tin
Augum. acid then Mrs. Weston 'kb( the aldnrit, f th. eessente eonterninaust, had gone dewe on her knee, and logetet her
In the home, the Rey. Dr. Smith, tbe li,jtien Chap'thi, Lieut metre. to Mandrel Mr. Quirk. And it was another uncon-
Got Harvey. Dr. We, and tweet three othe s, constant visitor, taut kted foot that this lady, with • couple of thort exceptions.
or Mrs. Weston and the family, and they all prove that she ems had been living In the same house with this weeUensen ever
moo ont of Mt. Germain. Colonel 1-1 trrey alai made an since, taking their meals together, +Ph only the /absurd
&Molt (end they h.d • plan also) to 'show it WRA impossible pretence of an old lely between 8 and 90, an coin-me Inca
that Leuliette's extortion about the Greeds hotel could be lid. Who if this lady 'were innocent when she left for Hon,
(errect-it was imputable to see into the room No. SI& Then towns, knowing her name had been coupled with Mr. quick's,
Mr. Quick's affidavit gave the chute story .1 hie acquaintance est a pure end honest womb, th n would e hare remained
with the Weston family. Ile had been an officer in the 14th with him two years on terms of the utmost familiarity I
Reginient ; he became acqueinted with Mr. Weston In the mu) were told she mum live athewhere. and that her
hunting fold; went to Wolyetem at the Invitstlint of the de. father was not • rich man ; but wind I MA any fattier,
fendent ; that he quilled Wolveton in IMO, and went to lemeter poor, gledly save her front Koch aMe ! The •Mds-
Boulogne to reedit with hi. aunt. Ile states *het the air of ,it of Laullette skewed the facilities for adultery Irmo
Boulogne did not agree with his aunt, and that It WIA deemed 1842 down to the time of her leaving in 1467- not only
doemble she thould remove into the interior, and he state. the general allegatioste, ht particular circumstance,, Perhaps he
; ircuna-tatmea of bl. guing let M. Germaine. Ile distinctly ought not to rely too much on the fact that upon the motion
ointradlets Leuliette's evidence of what took place at Le • receiver no denial wee made, became, the motion was by
the Grande lioteL Leurette heeled! had been discharged coment : but one would have thought that the tarty Rtid her
for the iroproptiety of admitting Tom Hitchlau to her malaise's would not have allowed Ave month. to pm without
bedroom. Then the learned cousuel called Munition to putting in an Indlgtant denial. and Insisting on no order be 3,4
the evidence of Zane Bahama, a rrant of the plaintiff, at Mad^. utitil the story was disproved. The learned counsel
Boulogne, who said after elm left, Leullette called ire het, and commented on the brief and guarded terms of the lady'.
told her it would be to ber 'demise, to remember certain cis affidavit denying the adultery. No general denial when ruck
cumstancee, witkla if they lied °warred would wriously reflect a* were in the affidavits, were on the flies of the
on piaiwire chatnetcs-, but also told her the new nothing id court, chanting her with adultery- before and after the execu-
%helm nun her brother tante with her, and tile Ito indule lion of the deed. It is met the fact so untruly stated in the
her to ruake such • statement, hood,e would row, Her neither, deols poll that since the rreettKon ql the Indenlure of the 75th
Theresa, corrolnundol this. He molted the Judge to ettunine December IMO, I how committed adultery ' And his friend
the e-r.sesemminatione of Mre. Weston, and Mr. Quick with sheltens himself under the question whether the deed was
the grsttent jimolble care. Mr. quick wao cromelanylned at revoked or not by adultery After the deed. Was that the
great length before Mr. Harvey, each he denim distinctly all couno which a lady of high mind would adopt, Item wan an
the Incriminatine eircumetanom, and he denies in the most opportunity for denial, hut eke not only ni t denies in detail
poaiLive manner that an, humvpriety ever took place between hu, "hr does rod deny at all, but confines herself to the simple
him end Mrs Weston, and also, who WWI WWI •Rilr•fy CVOea, statement that she hat not been guilty of &density since the
emmine for two days. denim Mt and wiles the dual question deest There watt no d uht of the technical advantage which
we. put she po•itirely oat,— had been derived from that course-en advantage which •
Mr. Brown Tom 101 kb+ still mark the words. person cons:tom of freedom from guilt would not have carod
Mr Cue:knell bite sacs: to have. At that time it wan not known whether the evidence
From tie time of no first introduction to Me. Quick ilivait of guilt restol on the statement of Leoliette alone, anti, there-
to the commenceinent °Rhin suit there has been no improper fore, the denial wan kept hack until the time when the
Intercourse Women Inc mid Mr. Quirk." defendant had Oates, lii. whole cam and it WWI no huger
She further mid that she can living with Vim Quick waa poesible to bring fonethi further evidt noe. They welt until
very much attached to her, and always called her Aunt Emily. ; they tee the full and onsaplete tauc aelind them before they
that she had always called Mr. Quick by hit Chruitian nano, pneluce their olden«. A good deal wee mid about these
and he had edited her by hors; titsl the had not applied to her witneems being deseharged ten-ants, but what other aline:sm,
relative., or takes any Hers to leave the tonne : had no means could bc expected. Was it to be believed that diecharged
of living: her ?SIMI Ras not at nile wealthy man : one of her o mante aderay • tell untruths, mei are adierse to the intereeta
broth,. in otoed, and the other is Oct welt irff. .he WAA Very of their modem and midremes 1 But one tit' them at least was
fend of Mies Quick. and. Is fact, hat been living under her roof not • discharged servant of either of the parties. Sho we.
and on her means Thc precise issue wan, had there 'teen the companion 14 • laly• who lived In the Name Mittm with
Improper Ititerenume. Mim quick. There was no rootlet: on the part of the witnette
Tbe Jmige: Between the 30th of December and the Met of Iltshren.
May, 1067. Itut all the previous and subsequent conduct is lie. Joint : Oh, she's • common rofrant too; how ..wn )ou
. _ .

rele: ant.
Mr. Cracknell The) have denied the.. allegations distinctly,
and, If that Is so, where is the balance of testiMony, Is
!Annette the person on whose tertiminiv the C..• mainly
depend. • altntas alines word ton C. 114. believe? Some of her
evidence I. ti grom that we must utterly reject it as being
altogether Improbable. The ammaintance begun in lettf, and
a Leullette I. to be believed, criminal coiplu.l at one to .k
plea.. Hr. Quick became the guest of the husband In Ism
not at the lady's Invitation, but the husband's—and continual
1.. reside with them until Maw, 10139, and your lordship will
find • letter from the husband which really upbraids him for
leaving his house. lie had. In the autumns of three care
accompanied them on the continent, and ha! continued on
most Intimate teems, addraring them by their Cr rimier, names,
and being 110 veal. There wee nothing eisntg,,ui.., in lint nil
- nothing on which hi. lordsbip *souk! m that Mr. Weston
awn Ju4tilled lit repudiating tilt wile and throwing her up m
the worbl withi 'to pOOO3 to support her. She could not go
to tbs. Diatom Court for snit:rimy, for that would bare bnitight
her within the deed. He felt assured his lord.hip would
decree that Mr• Warton •ne entitled te the declaration that

tall beta companion?
The Judge. Well, it does not MIMI% I Nbould believe a
VOlllll,Oll eersant lust es roor
Sir R. itagslly was glad of the interruption, becausett drew
more attention to her evidence. Mr, Weston, auntie
t e summer of INA, spent part of her time In lodgings at 10,
• Siere. Weymouth • Mr. qu.ck, and his aunt Miss quick,
being at No. U. After Mrs. Weston rctunied to Winston,
she came froguentle into Wm mouth. and went to her friend's
• quick's, I dgines. It was perfectly natural -nothing
..usplclous, per se. But what did Hebron sml
" I went to Weymouth in May, ISM. with a lad, named
Sherry, to lodge et the Belvidere. In thc NM! 11011 ft a
gentleman named quick also Indged,who was afterwards Joined
b. his aunt. Mi. quick. The plainlift, Mrs. Weston, heed at
N. 10. She need to all on Mr juick and lola aunt almat
terry del, and apfsem.d 1, riendly ts;rros will. them,
'ad wan alone with him. •IIW Pia and a
confirmed invalid. am. confined herself mostly to her own
bedroom, the bedroom of Mr. quick befog on the second
floor. In Ingest. Isski, Mrs. Sherry being unwell, I sat up
the whole of the night. asid my suspicions being 'roused

.„.
she prayed. by the late hours te-bett Mr. QUick ;Monied, I reamed
Mr. Jesse, Q.C.. mid the cue um very extraordinary, but myoelf on the tosicony outolde the window of the dining-
not diMcult. The defeticiont had put an impediment In the nom', sod from thence. aloof two reetork in the anen-
t:ogee'. way by revoking the deed and 1'..! left hino to, sleed i•tg. Imw the -aid %termw quick come out of the home
to fell hack upon. llte husband hah not been *Awned to pot No. 10, and come into No. 11, in which I srax then living. On
on record a charge .rf adoltery against his wife in lei, and he another occasion, whilst oitung in the halcohy with Susan
dot me ou 110. It h.' hoot cone o.unlcatol to Won, and why Childs. Imw h•ni come out at • little after twelve at night and
b.lll ~,t know It before. If 'hue storice of adultery before go toward. so. 10. Some person muting up at the Uwe, he
the separation oeretrue in 1561.5-6 why does not the booboo' went to the adjoining house. No. 11, until the patent had gone
explain how he eons, to hear id them now? The witticism. by, when he went up," the bounce( thy plaintiff. That I went
were Ann Hebron, Sarah Wildme, Elizabeth Ann 11Wwins. into the dining room on another suasion, about 11 at night,
and An Vincent. Higgins went into defendant'. service in and the re found Mrs. Weston and Mr. Quick in the dark ; toat
Felionny, 1664, and sit•yed till April, 166, Vincent wan there 'he met frequently, as often as twice. week, to come to Wey.
before loiellette: anal. eervice In legit, remaining till October, mouth and mend the greater pert of the day with Mr. Quick,
1861. Wildman was in Denim in February, lelft All these arriving at about eleven in the morning and returning in the
wore before the separation deed, end the) were brought for. evening. That the generally went up into the bedroom of the
wart for the fire time at the end of the roue. At the time mid Andrew Quick prior to diance, the red Andrew Quick
the Information was laid the only mitre. was Luelieste, N twin either in hi• bed room or dressing room. That one even.
.he a-an supplemented by the ethic:nee of discharged tenants, Mg I went Into his bedroom, and. Instead of finding the servant
who deposed to tircumotanceo occorring years ego. Leoliette in. I found the mid plaintiff, anal /Ir. Quick opened the chor.
hat been taken into defendant's terece agen—she wan In his She was very much confused, and made some excuse shoot
house that appearei on the depodUrins—he said nothing being there to waoh her hand,"
about the dellcu‘v of the matter-Vatting his wife. dischergol Now, that pet-son had not been cromexaminad ! If that cane
oervent and keeping her in the horn.. He was eked to stew wan before • jury would not the judge make some comment
hit evidence on the interlocutory motion for a receiver, and e to the Jury in summing up, on her hens allowed to go out
replied that he was mined it would he highly inconvenient without cree-ciaminstion. hut he did not rely on that ;he
and inconsistent Pi produre the evidence which was in hio celled nn theist that thi• snout., who woo a otranger to the
possession on all interlocutory motion, and the plaintiff au fandly. had her onmecionsanmurt.
now xtartled by the es {dente of three or four witnesses., to The J ode, Wu it in hie bedroom or het heiroont
eircunlatances which nobody can deny, as to prior adultery, of sir R. Bagatly fly lord, they were found in her bedroom
which defendant had given them no sort of intimation. behind the donr ; but she went up to his hedroom to wash her
The jedr, The only importnue of iftio io to hand.. The teemed shone& then referred to the evidence of
I she. the character of the lady • hid or course, if he knew of Miss hymen, the companion of Miss Quick ; but she merely
he evidence prior to the execution of the deed. the adultery spoke to thc time when the cellen lived at &minim& end not
enenthoted 1., tsat deed cannot apply to pfl.,faefa, one word did she my ten leg to rhos the improbiletty of the
Mr. intent What I want tothow In that when he filed that alit- statement of Hebron. If oho knew that Mrs Westin waohed
gotten he either didn't know or kin% want the court to knnw he her hands In Mite Quick's bedroom. she might have given
haslet-libelee of prior adultery. In he newer nu the 15th April, evidence denying Hebron. Bet no' the oune prudence 'mini.
ISM, he is entirely ,'l'ent about all this new evidence. or soy tested before .howed Itself here. and Mise hymen, called a. a
ssomeelon of prior adultery. It toonly to he explained on my witnew to reply_to the rffidaviti vi lirtWes,on, is utterly silent.
theory that this evidence won obtained afterealon. If this The Judge: Hu .be been ri"evekeulined
evidence is true why doesn't Mr. Weston in NAN into the Sir It, BegallY No, my lord.
Divorce Fourtat seer, instead of wanting your Lordship, rty • The Judge : Has Mary Chick been examined.
Ade wind, to my Inc at liberty to starve his wife. The only Sir R. Bagels : No, my lord, nobody seems to have hound her
cane attend 'ho lady Ia that Metter. to live with an aged lady. out. Stroh Wildman. who was upper housemaid, from
• relati,e, who. 1 .uppere, would not he likely to harboiar Februars. 1,5.1,50 the SenteMber folboving. mi.. -
persons who committed adultery, and, because her nephew "In March, 1666, Ime the plaintiff in her night dm.. werly
sometimes otitis at her house, we are to assume that adultery in the morning, tame out of the bedroom of the mkt Andrew
woo comrn Quick. and on two subsequent ocessiono I rw her in her night
Sir It. Regally: He'. been there for the last two yews, eleep. dram rinse to the bedroom door of tb• mid Andrew Quick. t `lt
ing In the next bedroom. nne occasion ere mid she had forgotten to In roe to light a
Mr. Jesse : I know ; and if that's In prove &Julien Imy fire, and had done it herseU, and on. oubsequent occasion she
nothing more extravagant can he conceived. But with what told me to go In and light tbe fire, which I did, the mid Andrew
MA it been met 11 th the portico have made affidavits, and Quick helot in bet" -
luth have been rigidly erns-examined. The learned counsel Thit I:the evident* of • party which Indicate. faellitim ft
then dwelt on Leullette's **element of what occurred at Pare the committing of adultery, although it might be rarebit of
--it man. very dramatic- -Freuch people are. How she went explanation. She I. not ceoes-cumined ; they only mid her
out to buy bon hew—how her bonnet was towed ogt, to her. evidence Is few. Then Bleabeth Ann Higgins we nuns at
This wao the evidence of a discharged servant, and Ike wag all Woe don. She says -
the other evidence—they had not an affidavit from • penson of "I frequently accompanied the plaintiff with the youngest
respectability or standing. Why' did then not get the evidence child, fanny, to the sleeping-morn of the mid Andrew Quick
wf the penono at the Portland lintel? They had not a ois gle whilst hewn. In bed and left them there. I have frequently
hit of Independent eridonce except the German story, and that gone to the door and found It "locked," and then there wane
slowed how evidence might be got up. peograph No. 5, which the learned counsel would net read.
The Judge . Supposing the person Aged been at the hotel at ' I have frequently men him with he arm round her waist, I
that time! have known him ids her and call her 'My dear Alder.'"
Mr. Jesse: Sec the wonderful danger !we have proved an The Judge There is nothing to oho. when that srao fire
alibi. but without It they had a most overabenring case, and communimted to Mr. Weston is there? Ido not mean to say
If we hul not rebuttiog midence what danger the parties would it is material, bet dhe knew of it at the thne he executed
have leen in ! Supposing the charge against them had been the deed It canoe affect the deed further than the, that it
murder. We have get ooncluotre evidence an to that cam, but may rite you a strong re tun for interpreting the evidence of
connot get evidence that sort to rebid the bedroom what took place subsequently.
stories for there were only three persons laid to have been Prevent; Str R. Regally lam not going toilette on the care of Mono
but in the cane at the Grande Hotel, we have the evidence of and Carcinoma Ile. Weston war perfectly blind. At that
Licht -re Wright, wh., show, that otsniling in the corridor the time. In October, 1666. other people were talking hut belted
witness could not see Into the room. The 'tortes that we twin the greatut faith In hi. wife, but it is clear from the correm
cootrodict. we do. The evidence of Tom Illitchins It something ponderer) that he remonstrated, and that led to separation.
remarkable. He- Mr, Quick's dlacharged servant -tells us But it woe not looked on as anything but temporary. It man
that the lady told hint thls incredible story, and I coil your at thought prodent for the lady to to away, her health required •
tenton to the evord• put into his mouth, "being or being 'han,,. and it wax hoped It would all blow over Ile believed
tongue'sl to be"—tlutt ave pet to us as the language of •grnom. in her Integrity, but he remonstrated on her familiarity with
They talked of Mr. Nsick residing In the same house. Why Mr. Quick. Ann Vincent spoke to &circumstance occurring an
he otayed for years at Widicton at Mr weston'o own requeot ; far back aa 185.1. The story I. this : Between the two hest.
bra.. so intimate with him that he occupied • hesinotrn next rooms there was • door, that door was very close to the bed in
1. or to that occupied hy Mr. Weston and his wile, anti with • which Mrs. Weston wax In the herd of sleeping a-ben at
shed rommunicaUng. Ann Higgins's e, idenee wos to show welyeton. When the wry int. desired to ifo from one room
that during all that time adultery had been going on, but if to the other, and the key was wanting, it was sometime. found
that were so, why didn't shemil.iatheri ohe told this story for under Mee Itrestorio pillow is hen the oeresntn went to make
he t first time. All this evidence, when end Mr. Mrs. Wesson's bed, there were three of them who found the
Weston procure It, and how The ninth paragraph of this quilt of Mts. Weston', bed had got in between the door—the
Wonlatell evidenee shows the amount of invention when you door must have been opened, and when they went to make the
been this kind of evidence - T an. rather shock to we such bed they were obliged to go to Mew vestoe's for the key to
evidence put in at all. Of Mileherte's es idence 1 troy ash unlock the door. what wax the inference—the the quilt WU
yttor lordship whether it is not incredible in itself. The nit not In the door when the bed was made the day before.
affidavit io Mr. Westoo's hinue-11. and that is a remarkoble one. Mr. Jewol : The husband and wife were sleeping togetherat
He tt lis us that he Wan not aware when he •igned the deed of that time.
any Mullen. and if he had been aerate be would not have Sir R. Basel.: But the husband was absent,
entered into the agreement. He does not he 11,,, when and how The Judge: Did they oniony the sone bedroom 7
he fire heard of these things. When we look at Pollaky and the Sir It. Basally: When together- -when at
ouggeunions of Mr. Weston, epee have am clear acres of sub rna. Mr. Jewel : Nobody mu she wasn't at home.
lion an preshie. Yo me the ouggestion to get at the oervants, The Judge I don't quite understand how it got there.
and the Leuileete at first twee only that they were at the Sir R. Ragalle The natural assumption io that in getting
hotel together. It lo not neeersary for your lordohip to ear into the room it was drawn over the oda of the bed.
more than that the defendant's case has not leen proved. Let The Judge Might it have been done by the molds
him go into the Divorce Court if he likes, and we tholl he pre. Mr. Jested: They opened the door.
pared to Meet him. Ido submit that he has not proved his The Judge :If the bed Iva.. close, and they opened the
cane. and thet trer lordship "honk' eve us • decree that Mr• door, In shaking the bed it might have happened.
Weston is entitled to receive her annuity. Sir R. Basally: Would it be consistent to have the key of
FaleAT. the doer In her own command'
Sir R. Basally replied: He said it hail been frequently Mr. haul: Shh was sleennit with her husband.
aokel in the course of the case why was Mrs. Weston brought Sir R. aurally :It ia• very convenient place to keep the key
'here: why did not Mr. Weston take proceeding. In the dare door was to he closed at night and opened in the morning.
Div..n.st Court Thom proceeding, necessarily be Nit is corroborative of the story Leullette hao told. If thin
lengthy, and by the terms. of the deed he hal power by • wan feu, vrbat was ender than to crew-examine upon it- -It
otroke of the pen to deprive her of the means of living wao Piet one of those circumstances on which croos-examinatkm
to 'dollen- with her remover. He certainly teas not wan like,y th have beneficial result.. The learned munel then
dieseed to am,w her to be In fwwwwwion (900 • year during referred to the evidence of Phillbert Melte. who opike to the
11,.' length) prnceedinr in the Divorce Collet. What proCeed. arrival of Mr. Quick at Boobene• fewdsys after her mistrow's
log. be neght take me the remelt of this nee, however, It might arrive (very singular 3. True, it was, appearance., at leant.
ehd, ,(wan not for him ton y. But this he had to my—the were for •time kept up. Ile hadhisoem litintri. and did not
mlection of the court wut not his the plaintiff had chosen parwe briloly to the mme home; hut afterwards both to to-
tes court, and if the queotion wore asked why did'nt Mr, gether to Paris--osingular course fora young married woman
Weston go into the Divorce Court, it might he asked airy did who, name had been unpleasontly couplet with Mr. Quick's.
Mrs. Weston, miser first *tee, come here. Instead of Proceeding Meisel mid:—
by deems and the fire question for hi. Lordship wag that of "When we first went to St. Domains. we doped at an hotel
juristiktlon Ilea-an axed to carry into effect the terms of • but we went to reed* in the Rue deCbateate Newf. Mr. Quick
certain deed. What trust was Nero wi far.. lois client wm constantly slept rued • resided in ouch house, having hi,
concerned He approbenslesl the proper course eras by distress, bedroom on the tame fhor an the plaintiff. and there being
With reference to the main issue -did Mrs. Weston (commit doors communicating and they were often alone together."
adultery in the interval between Derernhcr, 'O6, and the 20th And then ohe otateo
liar. ot the outert be mud es), Isi• LortnitiP t dlohelleve 'Me Judge Thvt's a erange otory. isn't it'
the greater port of whew Mr. Weston and Mr. Quiek had Sir It. Bagel) : Did she husgine all tido? She says she
steed on their ninth, A good tied had been sail in • called her openers end told her this otory. My lord, its
very Meuse manner about the employment of Mr. unfortunately
I•olloky. and the constant rope:tithe, of the words " Isuatites The Didge : Unfortunately. Sir itichnni Bogely. we are not
Pollaky as. like the comic expremions in • broad farce, u familiar with this kind of evidence as thev are in the Moore*
In whith the point io onlY the • constaet repetition of Court. There they understand what these things mean better
Use Mate Wank With MM.,. In NM WetthWe podtion than wad,,
there w•• mane feeling of delicacy remaining. Such Sir R. lineally: It unfortunately hailstone that the higher the parties did not commit open adultery : their acts were poolUon id the lady the treater is her fall.
drottaun'airina;:iln,.thloar:lrteentup.riere, r
od of un% arel.Y..twobin.inqpiadtbrerotintolSiractov:obectirtlittedwii7
dotamitligneeene jrud.t:gfeor A"a
m"'noriingedibledi. et'tohe make—that isha.b"duktdn.dro
young man with' whom eh' was Intricate, to cut
newel than those whose business wan to detect crime, and her come - -can't be conceived. Ido not believe that. ordinarily,
where messy is resorted to it is of the may mete of the • married lady would uk her bullhead to cut her corns anew
transaction the yore are obliged to mom to whom be a surreal
business it lo to dim:othover mere.road° Hs wee aware = wee
Ivens! Sir R. Basally observed that his Lordship was inked for the
feeling 'drone to se who • living hy tracins out the plaintiff lo believe In
Wine very extraordinary %n, and it
Deities of others. and he admitted there was tbe
tarbi.elneiselaisereeePi:dYalsbappeore:sodu.4 astbe"voluarspr.s.uPtlrmit pnee4 anoti hd27.ocwas...einwknnoiththtif
rstb:4Thi"erlirriubidle.dte°ne.d. 177belnklming"),Ibe.e7bentfts:lhilhari:itctf°rehat tt:a
iped.44. an'tniftWde Yaeu ;benerldtd'heitstaarin