--- language: - en bigbio_language: - English license: cc0-1.0 bigbio_license_shortname: CC0_1p0 multilinguality: monolingual pretty_name: CZI DRSM homepage: https://github.com/chanzuckerberg/DRSM-corpus bigbio_pubmed: false bigbio_public: true bigbio_tasks: - TXTCLASS --- # Dataset Card for CZI DRSM ## Dataset Description - **Homepage:** https://github.com/chanzuckerberg/DRSM-corpus - **Pubmed:** False - **Public:** True - **Tasks:** TXTCLASS Research Article document classification dataset based on aspects of disease research. Currently, the dataset consists of three subsets: (A) classifies title/abstracts of papers into most popular subtypes of clinical, basic, and translational papers (~20k papers); - Clinical Characteristics, Disease Pathology, and Diagnosis: Text that describes (i) symptoms, signs, or ‘phenotype’ of a disease; (ii) the effects of the disease on patient organs, tissues, or cells; (iii)) the results of clinical tests that reveal pathology (including biomarkers); (iv) research that use this information to figure out a diagnosis. - Therapeutics in the clinic: Text describing how treatments work in the clinic (but not in a clinical trial). - Disease mechanism: - Patient-Based Therapeutics: Text describing (i) Clinical trials (studies of therapeutic measures being used on patients in a clinical trial); (ii) Post Marketing Drug Surveillance (effects of a drug after approval in the general population or as part of ‘standard healthcare’); (iii) Drug repurposing (how a drug that has been approved for one use is being applied to a new disease). (B) identifies whether a title/abstract of a paper describes substantive research into Quality of Life (~10k papers); - [-1] - the paper is not a primary experimental study in rare disease - [0] - the study does not directly investigate quality of life - [1] - the study investigates qol but not as its primary contribution - [2] - the study's primary contribution centers on quality of life measures (C) identifies if a paper is a natural history study (~10k papers). - [-1] - the paper is not a primary experimental study in rare disease - [0] - the study is not directly investigating the natural history of a disease - [1] - the study includes some elements a natural history but not as its primary contribution - [2] - the study's primary contribution centers on observing the time course of a rare disease These classifications are particularly relevant in rare disease research, a field that is generally understudied. This data was compiled through the use of a gamified curation approach based on CentaurLabs' 'diagnos.us' platform. ## Citation Information ``` # N/A ```