Premise: They have to give labour concessions and more wage cuts and more benefit cuts in order to compete through the government's turning around and giving millions of dollars to another country to compete with ours, and not just a country with a good record, a country that has some of the worst human rights records in history.

Hypothesis: the country our government gave money to does not have a good record at all

this statement is definitely correct because the text says the country our country gave money to has a bad record


Premise: But as we respect someone's rights, and as we profess tolerance, we shouldn't change -- or have to change -- our basic views on the sanctity of marriage. I believe in the sanctity of marriage. I think it's very important that we protect marriage as an institution, between a man and a woman.

Hypothesis: sanctity of marriage is a view by a lot of people


Premise: Curriculum that works and phonics needs to be an integral part of our reading curriculum. Intensive reading laboratories, teacher retraining. I mean, there needs to be a wholesale effort against racial profiling, which is illiterate children. We can do better in our public schools.

Hypothesis: if they improve the curriculum then less kids will be illiterate

the context is about improving the curriculum to make teachers more effective at reducing illiterate children, So thats they statement I made, just paraphrased the context .


Premise: (3) The refusal by a traveller to answer any question asked by a preclearance officer does not in and of itself constitute reasonable grounds for the officer to suspect that a search of the traveller is necessary for the purposes of this Act or that an offence has been committed under section 33 or 34.".

Hypothesis: Travellers reserve the right to remain silent.

A traveller's refusal to answer a question doesn't entitle an officer to search them.


Premise: An October 22, 1998 article by Dianne Rinehart reported that according to an Angus Read poll, 51 per cent of British Columbians viewed the Nisga'a Final Agreement as a step in the right direction, with 33 per cent of those polled holding the opposite view and 16 per cent unsure of their views.

Hypothesis: dianne rinehart was a reporter

Not sure why that fooled the AI, maybe the context of the wording


Premise: Instead of taking this advantage it will soon need in international negotiation, that is the experience of harmonizing two great traditions, the civil law and the common law, the government chose to set one of these traditions aside, the French one, to bury it, and forget about it.

Hypothesis: The government chose to set less than 3 traditions aside.

The government chose to set one of the traditions aside. The system was confused by the number.


Premise: It's one of the reasons I'm a strong believer in what they call health savings accounts. These are accounts that allow somebody to buy a low-premium, high-deductible catastrophic plan and couple it with tax-free savings. Businesses can contribute, employees can contribute on a contractual basis. But this is a way to make sure people are actually involved with the decision-making process on health care.

Hypothesis: the person wants to save people money

he is speaking about cost savings related to healthcare


Premise: -- what weighs in that balance, because to go back for one second, in practical, economic terms I gather the difference between a copyright that lasts for 100 years, lasts for 1,000 years, lasts forever, is probably something less than 1,000 -- on $1,000 a penny.

Hypothesis: A penny does not equal $1000

Yes a penny is equal to $0.01, which is not equal to $1000


Premise: The petitioners are drawing attention to the fact that our region has been heavily affected by the groundfish moratorium imposed by Fisheries and Oceans Canada back in May 1994. Since then, the Atlantic Groundfish Strategy, or TAGS, has been the only means of survival for a large part of our population.

Hypothesis: Since 1994 the Atlantic Groundfish Strategy, or TAGS, has been not been the only means of survival for a small part of the population.

it says in the context that " since 1994, the Atlantic Groundfish Strategy, or TAGS, has been the only means of survival for a large part of our population."    So that means for the small remaining part of the population, this was not the only means of survival.                                                                                So the statement "   Since 1994 the Atlantic Ground fish Strategy, or TAGS, has been not been the only means of survival for a small part of the population. ", is definitely correct


Premise: Uniformity is not a sine qua non, and this is where Pepin-Robarts in reminding us of the opting in and opting out facilities and raising the compensation in opting out provided the opportunity if there is a spirit of goodwill and of pragmatic compromise for working out arrangements to accommodate the increasing pluralism in our federal society.

Hypothesis: The first word in the statement is Uniformity


Premise: If, in 1995, during the referendum debate in Quebec, the National Assembly had passed such a bill against the federalist vote, limiting it so that it would have less weight than the sovereignist vote, what would people have thought of the National Assembly and of its Parti Quebecois members?

Hypothesis: The bill against the vote wasn't passed.

The passage discusses what would have happened if the bill had passed. One would deduce that it didn't pass.


Premise: Increased liabilities will add a little to the cost of marine insurance but commercial vessels insured in mutual protection and indemnity associations will probably see no substantive increase in insurance rates because coverage already provided by mutual associations is unlimited.

Hypothesis: Unlimited marine insurance has a high cost differential to the price of a policy for individual commercial vessels.

The price is not actually listed and can't be compared with the limited evidence.


Premise: That's a place where we can use our generosity to influence in a positive way, influence nations. I believe we ought to have foreign aid, but I don't think we ought to just have foreign aid for the sake of foreign aid. I think foreign aid needs to be used to encourage markets and reform.

Hypothesis: foreign aid is only for the rich

This idea isnt stated but can be assumed based on the statement..


Premise: Well, let's stay on the subject for a moment. New question related to this. I figured this out; in the last 20 years there have been eight major actions that involved the introduction of U.S. ground, air or naval forces. Let me name them. Lebanon, Grenada, Panama, the Persian Gulf, Somalia, Bosnia, Haiti, Kosovo. If you had been president for any of those interventions, would any of those interventions not have happened?

Hypothesis: The president could have intervene Somalia.

It is neither correct or incorrect because it depends on many factors


Premise: I'm for working with the groups, not just with industry but also with the citizen groups and local communities to control sprawl in ways that the local communities themselves come up with. But I disagree that we don't know the cause of global warming.

Hypothesis: Global warming is caused by the sun.

No one really knows the cause of global warming.  It could be the sun and then again it could be something else.


Premise: If the Liberals had listened to Reform in 1993 the government could have been investing in a farm safety net to protect farmers who are getting hammered by European Union subsidies and unfair trade practices by the U.S. So far there has been no response from the agriculture minister to Reform's proposals.

Hypothesis: The minister is working on a solution

This statement is neither correct nor incorrect, because we do not know what the minister is currently working on based on this context. The system may have thought the minister's lack of response indicates a lack of work, which is not necessarily the case


Premise: I do, I do. The Persian Gulf, obviously. And Bosnia. And you have already talked about Kosovo. But the reverse side of the question, Governor, that Vice President Gore mentioned, 600,000 people died in Rwanda in 1994. There was no U.S. intervention, no intervention from the outside world. Was that a mistake not to intervene?

Hypothesis: The was no U.S. intervention in the Persian Gulf in 1994.

Interventions are mentioned in the context but the system does not know if that was why the Persian Gulf was mentioned.


Premise: If the union has recommended acceptance of this contract, and I assume then that it feels this is the best deal it can make, and the government is satisfied it is the best deal, it is fair to all concerned, does the Treasury Board president not feel that he may be endangering the ratification process by what we are doing here this evening?

Hypothesis: The Treasury Board president feels he may not be endangering the ratification process.

The union 100 percent recommended acceptance of this contract.


Premise: The CBO said very clearly that if you were to adopt the president's plan, there would be a $2 trillion hole in Social Security, because today's workers pay in to the system for today's retirees. And the CBO said -- that's the Congressional Budget Office; it's bipartisan -- they said that there would have to be a cut in benefits of 25 percent to 40 percent.

Hypothesis: The CBO does not support the presidents plan

It doesn't say if they support it or not, they just said there'd have to be cuts.


Premise: My colleague from the Bloc Quebecois, the hon. member for Berthier-Montcalm, repeatedly questioned the Minister of Justice, asking her whether she thinks it is right for a major drug dealer like Joseph Lagana, who laundered nearly $47 million, to get paroled after serving only one sixth of his sentence.

Hypothesis: The Minister of Justice gave her opinion about Joseph Lagana.

It doesn't say if she answered the question or not. I guess the system assumed the question was answered.


Premise: In fact, I may have been walking out of the room at the time and in close proximity to her. And so at the time when Max was speaking -- I believe that there were people who spoke in between she and Max Pell. But at the time when he stood to speak, I was in the restroom and sort of coming back from the restroom, so I don't really recall exactly what his comments were.

Hypothesis: The speaker knows the name of all people present.

The speaker refers to one person as She, but that doesn't mean he doesn't know her name.


Premise: That's right. That's the important hurdle, and we'd like to jump that first, but the other ones, Justice, you're right, in 1831 and in 1909 Congress extended terms in a way that is inconsistent with the strongest form of the test that we have advanced. Those extensions, however, were never challenged in any court and certainly not considered by this Court.

Hypothesis: In 1909 Congress made  a bad decision to extend terms.

I have no idea why congress extended terms- it could have been bad or could not.


Premise: But they see a compassionate, strong, great first lady in Laura Bush. I can't tell you how lucky I am. When I met her in the backyard at Joe and Jan O'Neill's in Midland, Texas, it was the classic backyard barbecue. O'Neill said, "Come on over. I think you'll find somebody who might interest you. "So I said all right. Bopped over there. There was only four of us there. And not only did she interest me, I guess you would say it was love at first sight.

Hypothesis: Laura Bush was interested in him.

it's neither correct nor incorrect because it doesn't say if she was or was not  interested at that time. I think the system read interested and assumed she was because he was.


Premise: Everything is a gift from the Almighty. And as I measure the words of the Bible -- and we all do; different people measure different things -- the Koran, the Torah, or, you know, Native Americans who gave me a blessing the other day had their own special sense of connectedness to a higher being. And people all find their ways to express it.

Hypothesis: the Almighty is considered violent

We do not know is the Almighty is considered peaceful or violent. There is no general consensus


Premise: To do so requires looking beyond the legislation and the criminal justice system at ways available to our society to deal with problems such as child poverty and child abuse, which are often an underlying cause of youth crime, and to help young people not to make the kind of choices that may lead them to engage in criminal behaviour.

Hypothesis: All youth crime is vandalism.

From the context, we do not know specifically what criminal behaviour constitutes youth crime, it could be all, none, or some in regards to vandalism.  Therefore, the statement is neither definitely correct nor definitely incorrect.


Premise: I want to -- obviously in the egregious cases we need to enforce civil rights law, but we need to make sure that internal affairs decisions at the local level do their job and be given a chance to do their job. I believe in local control of governments, and obviously if they don't there needs to be a consequence at the federal level.

Hypothesis: civil rights law need to be enforce intermediately.

according to the text, they  need to enforce civil rights law, but we don't now if it has to be now.


Premise: I ask today whether the parliamentary secretary, on behalf of the minister, will confirm that this commitment would not only address the issues I have listed but would also ensure that equivalent safety facilities to those of other airports with the same capacity such as Ottawa and Winnipeg are available for Halifax International Airport.

Hypothesis: Ottawa has a sunny beach.

From the context, we do not know whether or not Ottawa has a sunny beach, therefore the statement is neither definitely correct nor definitely incorrect.


Premise: I understand that that's not what the defendants want in this case, but I don't think it's called for. And, as a matter of fact, I think if I did that and I ordered that and if -- I assume that the reporters would not testify and I would predict, if it went to the Third Circuit on that basis, I would be reversed. I don't think that that's a fair area of inquiry to get into.

Hypothesis: the reporters would be happy to help

it says the reporters would not testify but it never said they would not be happy to help and therefore it is neither correct or incorrect


Premise: Honourable senators, I give notice that on Tuesday, September 21, 1999, I shall call the attention of the Senate to the financing of post-secondary education in Canada and particularly that portion of the financing that is borne by students, with a view to developing policies that will address and alleviate the debt load which post-secondary students are being burdened with in Canada.

Hypothesis: the senate will be financing post secondary education till no longer able in the country of canada

It did not give any frame of time to when it would stop


Premise: Well, you know, certainly what is happening in the country today in the way of congressional -- under the Commerce Clause is totally different than what the Framers had in mind, but we've never felt that that was the criterion. What the Framers thought of, there weren't steamboats, there weren't railroads.

Hypothesis: This result was expected


Premise: Mr. Speaker, I am prepared to move a motion to refer the matter of the minister's actions to the committee, if you find that there is a prima facie case, and there is no mandate from this House and no one has the right to represent that they may act for members of this House without specific authority from this House.

Hypothesis: I am not happy to move a motion but there is no specific authority from the house.

I introduced an emotional viewpoint that wasn't mentioned in the context but may have existed and the system may have found this nuance difficult to pick up on.


Premise: Yes. I remember comments about our country being founded on Christianity and not needing to teach the faiths of other people. And I remember talking to my husband about that in the car ride home, as well, because we're both teachers and I was -- when I hear things like that, I immediately think of my students, and I was thinking about the diverse group of students that I have in my classroom, who all have different religious viewpoints, and how difficult that would be to tell one student that, you know, we can't express your belief, but we can express that person's belief in the classroom.

Hypothesis: The speaker is fictional.

There is no way to know if the speaker is fictional or real. It could be either.


Premise: Hon. members will know that this official opposition attaches great importance to ensuring that parliament clearly states its intent in any bill that we consider or that we adopt, because if we do not, and the government is often sloppy in this area, we simply hand jurisdiction by default over to the courts, and that has been done far too many times.

Hypothesis: Parliament should be replaced with an unelected upper house.

From the context, we do not know whether or not Parliament should be replaced with an unelected upper house, therefore the statement is neither definitely correct nor definitely incorrect.


Premise: When an agreement of this nature was being negotiated, the governments of the day, both governments-because I hold the Government of British Columbia equally responsible-should have understood from the very beginning that if they wanted it accepted by the people of British Columbia they had to include the people of British Columbia in the negotiations so that there would be an acceptance level there.

Hypothesis: The people of British Columbia will never accept the agreement

They may or may not. I think the system had difficulty because I used an absolute (never)


Premise: For example, by suggesting that the Minister of Labour uses parliamentary immunity to take an unfair action against a person, he is implying that if he spoke outside the House of Commons the Minister of Labour would be subject to some kind of civil suit, so he is imputing motives to the Minister of Labour.

Hypothesis: The Minister of Labor is suggesting that they all don't not go out for pizza later.

The minister says nothing about pizza, but I guess the AI is confused.


Premise: We are going to simply have them testify for the purpose of authenticating the contents of that article, nothing more, nothing less, because I really believe that to do more than that is to create, I think, a precedent which would have reporters called -- Mr. Benn, I think, fears that even this would do that. I don't share that fear. But to go any further than that would mean that a reporter's veracity could be questioned each and every time something like this comes up. I strain mightily not to have to do that. That's what I'm talking about. Now, I don't know if that clarifies it.

Hypothesis: they can refuse to testify


Premise: And we have a fundamental choice to make. Are we going to step up to the plate as a nation the way we did after World War II, the way that generation of heroes said okay, the United States is going to be the leader. And the world benefitted tremendously from the courage that they showed in those post-war years.

Hypothesis: World War III will take place in 2025.

it's neither correct/incorrect because we have no idea if another World War will take place at all, let alone knowing what year specifically. It's difficult because the text mentions WWII, so this confused the system I guess.


Premise: Mr. Speaker, given Canada's historic role as a supporter of peace, a mosaic of different cultures and an international proponent of democracy incorporation, the petitioners feel it would be fully appropriate for Canada to join the ranks of peace blossoms worldwide with the symbolic designation as a peace nation.

Hypothesis: Mr. Speaker will be Mr. Speaker next year.

Whoever the Speaker is, he may or may not be in that office next year. He could lose an election, he could die, he could retire. Or he might be Mr. Speaker for many more years.


Premise: With the exception of a limitation which illustrates the distinction between forever on the one hand and a definite number on the other, is there any limitation in the clause? Does the promotion, does the preambular recitation of promotion as such place a limit on it?

Hypothesis: limitation in the clause is known by bill


Premise: And Charlotte Buckingham I recall really being the only person who got up to stand in defense of the school board, and she was Mr. Buckingham's wife, or is Mr. Buckingham's wife. And she quoted Scripture, Old Testament, actually, all Old Testament Scripture about why the school board is right, basically. And she also talked about school prayer and the need for school prayer in that speech that she had prepared.

Hypothesis: Charlotte Buckingham has talked to carter


Premise: But if I went back to those groups that have been working on this problem for so many years and presented this option, this solution from the Reform Party, I think I would be greeted with ``oh no, not again, here we go, another attempt to try to solve this problem through legal provisions, another attempt to spend more money, more time, more effort on Criminal Code sanctions, another attempt to scratch the surface of this issue and never go beyond''.

Hypothesis: This issue has only two side.s

It could have multiple perspectives or sides.


Premise: The American middle-class family isn't making it right now, Bob. And what the president said about the tax cuts has been wiped out by the increase in health care, the increase in gasoline, the increase in tuitions, the increase in prescription drugs.

Hypothesis: How to make a backyard badminton court you have one option

it is not stated clearly in the paragraph


Premise: sets out the procedures that will have to be followed by businesses covered under this bill to make sure that the client is fully informed of the nature of the new service, of the date the new service is to begin, of its cost calculated monthly and annually, of the fact that the new service is not mandatory, of the fact that the client may obtain the new service by signing a business reply card, and of any other matter that may be prescribed.

Hypothesis: The businesses are not mandated to follow the procedures.

The bill will force the businesses to follow the new procedures.


Premise: History will no doubt properly credit him and his government for their courage and foresight, initiatives such as the free trade agreement with the United States and NAFTA, abolishing the 13.5-per-cent manufacturers sales tax and introducing the 7-per-cent GST consumption tax to spur exports.

Hypothesis: He abolished the manufacturer's sales tax and GST consumption tax.

Actually, he & his govt. abolished the 13.5-per-cent manufacturers sales tax and INTRODUCED the 7-per-cent GST consumption tax. The partially correct statement fooled the model.


Premise: It was sent out with no name on it, but it is under the heading "Standing Committee on Privileges, Standing Rules and Orders," which is scheduled to meet today, November 23, at 4:30 p.m. The agenda has five items on it, four of which have nothing to do with a question of privilege.

Hypothesis: Standing Committee on Privileges, Standing Rules and Orders does not have anything to do with the letter.

Standing Committee on Privileges, Standing Rules and Orders was the only thing written on the letter or envelope so the answer is incorrect.


Premise: I interpret the order and the amended order to mean that Your Honor, in a sense, has addressed them as fact witnesses. I don't think you actually come out and use the word "fact witnesses," but as one reads the order, that's the implication. And you initially had indicated that you did not feel that the reporter's privilege stood in this kind of a case.

Hypothesis: I don't think you actually come out and use the word "fat witnesses," but as one reads the order, that's the implication.

It's definitely incorrect because the text says "fact witnesses", not "fat witnesses". It's difficult for the system because they are very similar textually.


Premise: In describing these features of the statutory review scheme in some detail, I want to emphasize that one of the important purposes of the scheme is to ensure that the people of Nunavut are not treated as second class citizens when it comes to the rights accorded to them by their court system.

Hypothesis: The narrator wants to emphasize that one of the important purposes of the scheme is to ensure that the people of Nunavut are treated as second class citizens.

It says "not treated", not "treated", therefore definitely incorrect. I guess it's difficult because I changed the text and said "the narrator', which probably confused the system.


Premise: For three days we joined the anniversary trail ride commemorating the 1874 march west of the original North West Mounted Police contingent; a great adventure which originally took 275 officers and men from Fort Dufferin south of Winnipeg all through the southern part of Saskatchewan and southern Alberta to Fort Whoop-Up 125 years before.

Hypothesis: 275 men from Fort Dufferin took 125 years to travel to Winnipeg


Premise: This practice of forbidding the use of direct citations from the debates of the House of Commons, euphemistically identified as "the other place," was originally intended to prevent, according to Erskine May, fruitless arguments between members of two distinct bodies who are unable to reply to each other and to guard against recrimination and offensive language in the absence of the other party.

Hypothesis: The practice had contained use of direct citations

It says it prohibited the use, so this is incorrect


Premise: That stands in stark contrast, by the way, to a man who is going to leave 50 million -- 50 million Americans out of tax relief. We just have a different point of view. It's a totally different point of view. He believes only the right people ought to get tax relief.

Hypothesis: 50 Americans will not have tax relief.

the sentence says 50 million, not 50. I think the system over looked the written out numbers.


Premise: This government had better be prepared to reinforce the budgets of these institutions that we rely on to protect our security, the security of our industries and the high tech development occurring, to protect those secrets from encroachment and incursion by forces outside of our country that have almost an open door to move across our borders into our country and set up their espionage organizations to take these secrets from our very high tech society in this country and use them against us.

Hypothesis: This government had better be prepared to reinforce the budgets of these institutions that we rely on to protect our cars

We rely to protect our security, not cars.


Premise: What I'm saying is, is that as we promote life and promote a culture of life, surely there are ways we can work together to reduce the number of abortions: continue to promote adoption laws -- it's a great alternative to abortion -- continue to fund and promote maternity group homes; I will continue to promote abstinence programs.

Hypothesis: This passage is about education


Premise: What I have done is what every member of parliament has an obligation to do and that is to make sure that the programs that apply to the constituents under the job creation program apply to the people who voted for the member for Saint-Maurice just as the programs apply to the members for Prince George-Peace River, Kootenay-Columbia, Kootenay-Boundary-Okanagan, Dauphin-Swan River, Esquimalt-Juan de Fuca, Cariboo-Chilcotin, and so on.

Hypothesis: What we have done is what every member of parliament has an obligation to do and that is to make sure that the programs

The narrator says it is what they have done, not "we". I think the model got confused because the change is so subtle.


Premise: Jim, one of the issues that I would like to close with in my statement is education, because it's an example of the overall approach that I think is important. This race is about values, it's about change, it's about giving choices to the American people.

Hypothesis: The person speaking is Jim.

It looks more like the person speaking is saying Jim, like take a pause.


Premise: The Bloc Quebecois believes that the renewal of the SFOR mandate in Bosnia-Hercegovina should be accompanied by increased support for the International Crime Tribunal, a more significant support for this international court, which is playing a fundamental role with regards to the aftermath of the conflict in Bosnia-Hercegovina.

Hypothesis: The Bloc Quebecois does not believe that the renewal of the SFOR mandate in Bosnia-Hercegovina should not not be accompanied by increased support for the International Crime Tribunal.

I used a triple negative, which confused the AI.


Premise: Mr. Speaker, the second petition deals with concerns about child pornography, specifically in British Columbia, and the fact that the B.C. Court of Appeal has struck down subsection 163(1)(4) of the criminal code that makes possession of child pornography a criminal offence and that the court decision is therefore placing children in British Columbia at risk.

Hypothesis: Subsection 163(1)(4) of the criminal code in British Columbia does not deem possession of child pornography as a criminal offence

This is incorrect because subsection 163(1)(4) does indeed deem possession of child pornography as a criminal offence.


Premise: The motion reads as follows: ``That this House request that the government convey to the governor of the state of Texas, the hon. George W. Bush, and to parole authorities of this state, its very serious concern about the violation of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations in the case of Mr. Stanley Faulder, a Canadian citizen who is to be executed on December 10, 1998 at Huntsville State Prison; and further, that the government convey this House's respectful request that the execution be stayed pending a judicial review of the case to ensure that due process has been followed''.

Hypothesis: George W. Bush was president on December 10, 1998.


Premise: I would agree. And I also agree that most police officers, of course, are doing a good job and hate this practice also. I talked to an African-American police officer in Springfield, Massachusetts not long ago who raised this question and said that in his opinion one of the biggest solutions is in the training.

Hypothesis: I talked to an African-American police officer in Springfield, Massachusetts long ago who raised this question and said that in his opinion one of the biggest solutions is in the training.

it was not long ago it should have been not too long ago but the rest was verbatim so the AI recognized it as correct


Premise: I agree, and this Court has -- just talking about the judgment of the Congress the 105th Congress in 1998. This is the way the argument that somehow implicitly the initial 1790 copyright statute was saying to people, you get a copyright if you exchange whatever existing rights you have. That simply does not make any sense. There is no language, and it's a relatively late-discovered argument, because it sees its full --

Hypothesis: The 105th Congress was responsible for the 1790 copyright statute

The 105th Congress was active in 1998. I think the system got it wrong because I stitched two correct concepts together.


Premise: The port authority may establish a certain fashion of operation based on the bylaws that are in place now in the neighbouring municipality or jurisdiction and then all of a sudden, if that jurisdiction were to change its bylaws, it could cause the port authority to have to make substantial and profound changes in the way it operates.

Hypothesis: It would be completely illegal for the port authority to change any of its bylaws that would alter their operations.

I fooled the system by the wording I used.


Premise: Tonight the topic will be domestic affairs, but the format will be the same as that first debate. I'll moderate our discussion under detailed rules agreed to by the candidates, but the questions and the areas to be covered were chosen by me. I have not told the candidates or anyone else what they are.

Hypothesis: the topic will be domestic affairs, moderated on rules and questions agreed to by the candidates.

i wrote "the topic will be domestic affairs, moderated on rules and QUESTIONS agreed to by the candidates."


Premise: I have, I have. First question is what's in the best interests of the United States? What's in the best interests of our people? When it comes to foreign policy that will be my guiding question. Is it in our nation's interests? Peace in the Middle East is in our nation's interests.

Hypothesis: War in the Middle East does not impact other nations.

The speaker is talking about the interests of the United States, but when I posed the questions I stated "other nations", leaving the country ambiguous. The United states is not part of the Middle East and would be considered "other nations" outside of the Middle East, making the statement false, but creating difficulty for the computer


Premise: We need the independence to make sure that the office will not interfere with the military structure whatsoever and that it will act as an ombudsman for people in the military structure, either family members in the military, the military personnel themselves or civilian members of the Canadian Armed Forces who are involved with the military.

Hypothesis: We need the independence to make sure that the office tv show will not interfere with the military structure

It says it needs to be sure that the office will not interfere, not "the office tv show" because it has nothing to do with that.


Premise: And yes, I think it's something that people need to consider. This isn't something new. I read a report, or a memo, from somebody in his 1988 campaign -- I forgot the fellow's name -- warning then Senator Gore to be careful about exaggerating claims. I thought during his debate with Senator Bradley saying he authored the EITC when it didn't happen.

Hypothesis: The name of the fellow who wrote the report in question is Mr. Bradley.

The report was from an unnamed man in Gores 1988 campaign. Not Mr. Bradley, who was debating Gore. I think the model got confused by changing Senator Bradley to Mr. Bradley.


Premise: In the negotiations over the past two years, it is understandable that table 2 union members had no hesitation using their right to strike, which they had obtained on December 16, 1998. So, in a perfectly legal context, the union is exercising its means of pressure by holding rotating strikes across the country since January 18.

Hypothesis: Strikes began on New Year's day.


Premise: In this case, the change agreed to between the Department of Canadian Heritage and the department concerned takes precedence over other regulations under the Fisheries Act, the Coastal Fisheries Protection Act, the Canada Shipping Act, the Arctic Waters Pollution Prevention Act, the Navigable Waters Protection Act or the Aeronautics Act.

Hypothesis: The Department of Canadian Heritage cannot disagree with the Coastal Fisheries Protection Act

The statement says that an agreement with this department has taken precedence over this act, indicating the two must disagree in some manner.  I am not sure why the model cannot predict this one.


Premise: That's right. That's the important hurdle, and we'd like to jump that first, but the other ones, Justice, you're right, in 1831 and in 1909 Congress extended terms in a way that is inconsistent with the strongest form of the test that we have advanced. Those extensions, however, were never challenged in any court and certainly not considered by this Court.

Hypothesis: Congress extended terms in 2009 in an inconsistent way

No Congress extended terms in an inconsistent way in 1831 and 1909


Premise: This dialogue with western Canadians showed us that, beyond the hollow rhetoric, do-nothing attitude and piecemeal approach of the Liberal government, ways can be found to establish sound political relations, based on a new partnership that will serve the interests of both Canada and Quebec.

Hypothesis: The new partnership will serve the interest of North America.

The new partnership will serve the interest of Canada and Quebec, not the United States.


Premise: Mr. Chief Justice, and may it please the Court: The questions today, especially the initial questions, suggest one of the many insurmountable obstacles to petitioners' petition in, position in this case. That is that the first Congress explicitly gave copyright protection to the authors of any books already printed as well as explicitly the owners of existing copyrights.

Hypothesis: The court session is to discuss issues other than copyright

The context makes is clear that the session is to discuss issues related to copyright, so it is incorrect to say that they are there to discuss other things. The system probably did not understand this


Premise: During the years between World War I and World War II, a great lesson was learned by our military leaders and the people of the United States. The lesson was that in the aftermath of World War I, we kind of turned our backs and left them to their own devices and they brewed up a lot of trouble that quickly became World War II.

Hypothesis: During the years between World War I and World War II, a great lesson was learned by our military leaders and the people of the United No.

It was united states, not united no. I think that confused the model by putting "no"


Premise: In my home province of Prince Edward Island during one year alone there were 6,845 calls received by Transition House Association; 1,201 calls received by the Child Abuse Line; and 757 new cases opened by Victims Services, of which 108 were sexual abuse cases, 242 wife abuse cases, and 46 other family abuse cases.

Hypothesis: Transition house is located at 1201 Child Abuse Line.

I just made the address up by using the names of two of the agencies mentioned and one of the numbers of calls made. It is completely fabricated. I think the system just looks for words/numbers from the text.


Premise: They are only interested when commodity prices are going up, as they were when oil prices went up and Western Canadians were reaping the benefits of world prices and hence we had the National Energy Program imposed by the Liberals, a program that redistributed billions of dollars all across Canada, money that belonged to the producing provinces.

Hypothesis: The statement was made by a liberal person.

The statement stated about the National Energy Program imposed by the Liberals that went to Canada but not the producing provinces. The statement is negative against Liberals so they are not Liberals.


Premise: Mr. Speaker, Robert Kennedy once said each time a person stands up for an ideal, strikes out against injustice, they send forth a tiny ripple of hope, and crossing each other from a million different centres of energy, those ripples build a current that can sweep down the mightiest walls of resistance.

Hypothesis: Mr. Speaker was Robert Kennedy

The speaker was talking about Robert Kennedy not speaking to him directly


Premise: Second, the aim of the initiative is to expand the category of offences for which a young offender may be brought before a regular court, which will include, in addition to murder, attempted murder, manslaughter and violent sexual assault, the reiteration of the facts of the crime and will lower from 16 to 14 the age at which young offenders may be transferred to an ordinary court.

Hypothesis: the age to go to court goes from 16 up to 14

I said it goes UP to 14, that makes no sense


Premise: Well, the line comes from deciding what the First Amendment interest is, and if this Court heed the First Amendment interest off of this difference between selecting who gets the benefit of 20 years of extension and just simply legislating in a general way prospectively, then this Court could hold, with respect to the prospective, that it's not even necessary to raise the intermediate scrutiny in that context, but again, for Ashwander reasons we don't think that this Court should address the prospective aspect of the CTEA even under the First Amendment.

Hypothesis: This case involves the Declaration of Independence

This case involves the Constitution and Bill of Rights not the Declaration of Independence.


Premise: I do. I think that in this 21st century we will soon see the consequences of what's called global warming. There was a study just a few weeks ago suggesting that in summertime the north polar ice cap will be completely gone in 50 years. Already people see the strange weather conditions that the old timers say they've never seen before in their lifetimes.

Hypothesis: the study was on the poler bear decline


Premise: Farmers are going to find out how the decision was made to make a public announcement that our grain was not selling in Japan and why this government was unable to settle the labour negotiations to keep our grain moving; and not only settle negotiations, but in fact have legislation in place to facilitate grain movement.

Hypothesis: Japan is not buying a lot of grain.

The agent said that an announcement was made stating that our grain was not selling in Japan.  I think the change is vocabulary tricked the system.


Premise: In the last debate, my opponent said those lawsuits only caused the cost to go up by 1 percent. Well, he didn't include the defensive practice of medicine that costs the federal government some $28 billion a year and costs our society between $60 billion and $100 billion a year.

Hypothesis: the federal government has money

Saying that the federal government has costs to pay each year is an implication that the federal government has money because that is the only way to pay said costs.


Premise: Yeah, no question about that, but there also needs to be strong enforcement of the law. Some kid who feels like -- doesn't matter where the gun comes from, it could be a cheap gun, expensive gun. What matters is something in this person's head says there is not going to be a consequence.

Hypothesis: The speaker is a big fan of law-enforcement


Premise: If her reference is to Premier Clark, I assume Premier Clark has by now spoken to his minister of health with whom I spoke yesterday and has been reminded that the British Columbia government was at the table, part of the discussions, part of the agreement, and stands solidly with the rest of the governments of the country behind this agreement.

Hypothesis: They have an agreement with the minister.

They do have an agreement with the minister.


Premise: The Canada pension plan contribution rate increased to 7% from 6.4% in January 1999, which is an annual increase of $1.4 billion taken out of the pockets of Canadian taxpayers, whether they are business owners and their businesses are having to pay their portion or people who are actually on the frontline doing the work.

Hypothesis: they found themselves losing more money due in part to a law

According to the statement, more money was taken away from Canadians at the beginning of the year as a result of the law. This makes my statement correct. The model seemed to be confused with common vs proper nouns. It would probably catch me if I used the word Canadians, but the word they would slip under its radar.


Premise: The report of the special joint committee quotes from Mr. Borovoy, page 9: ``The state of equality and fairness can only benefit by the abolition of special preferences for any denominational groups even if those denominations happen to comprise a large percentage of the population.

Hypothesis: Special preferences does not help equality and fairness.


Premise: Jim, one of the issues that I would like to close with in my statement is education, because it's an example of the overall approach that I think is important. This race is about values, it's about change, it's about giving choices to the American people.

Hypothesis: The statement was addressed to a man whose full name may be James.

System missed that Jim is usually short for James


Premise: On the other hand, they've said that it enhances state standards and critical thinking. In my mind, everything that you do in a classroom is teaching. And I don't necessarily think that's just in my mind. I believe that's true of all educators. The way I dress when I go to work tells my students something.

Hypothesis: Everything you do and wear in every classroom, even the minor details such as what clothes you have on, is teaching

The statement stated that even the clothes that you wear teach something, so my statement was correct


Premise: This will be a major incentive to universities and teaching and research hospitals across Canada to not only take advantage of the foundation for innovation and its assistance in upgrading and building research infrastructure but also to make use of the $400 million that has been made available to the university research granting councils to further support the performance of international quality research in this country.

Hypothesis: Canada has places to learn in it

Canada has places to learn in it, otherwise they wouldn't propose this


Premise: Well, there's a law pending called the Employment Non-Discrimination Act. I strongly support it. What it says is that gays and lesbians can't be fired from their job because they're gay or lesbian. And it would be a federal law preventing that. Now, I wonder if the -- it's been blocked by the opponents in the majority in the Congress. I wonder if the Governor who lend his support to that law.

Hypothesis: Gays can be fired now.


Premise: One feature of the summary trial reform that was discussed at length in committee was the requirement to provide commanding officers with more comprehensive training in their military justice duties and responsibilities and to have them certified as qualified to conduct summary trials.

Hypothesis: The summary trial reform will make a difference in the training.

It said that the The summary trial reform will make it that they get more comprehensive training so my statement is correct.


Premise: Were I to have had the opportunity to elaborate on the comments that I began, I would demonstrate to the member opposite that the amount of latitude leads us into the situation where we have to wonder whether the bill, as currently written, is going to have the effect that we desire.

Hypothesis: The speaker is unsure about the bill

The speaker's statement reflects the words written in the statement making my statement correct. The model was probably looking for a certain pattern of words. My statement passed because it didn't reflect that pattern of words.


Premise: We have to try to get to the heart of those problems: problems surrounding the murder of a Somalia civilian; the cover-up of the murder; the failure of the general staff and the government to hold anyone accountable for their actions or omissions; the cultural secrecy within the Department of National Defence; and the double standards in the military justice system all became very evident during the Somalia inquiry.

Hypothesis: Somalia is not a person


Premise: It has gone through all the stages of the democratic system in Canada and Quebec, and you can be sure that not a single Bloc Quebecois member of Parliament will oppose the proper workings of democracy in this country called Canada, and in the emerging country which will be called Quebec.

Hypothesis: The members won't oppose how the government works.


Premise: I think it's important to promote a culture of life. I think a hospitable society is a society where every being counts and every person matters. I believe the ideal world is one in which every child is protected in law and welcomed to life. I understand there's great differences on this issue of abortion, but I believe reasonable people can come together and put good law in place that will help reduce the number of abortions.

Hypothesis: Reducing the number of abortions is this persons goal.

The passage states that they think people can come together to reduce abortions.


Premise: We have fought to try to raise the minimum wage in the last years. But the Republican leadership of the House and Senate won't even let us have a vote on it. We're not allowed to vote on it. They don't want to raise the minimum wage. The minimum wage is the lowest minimum wage value it has been in our nation in 50 years.

Hypothesis: The republican leaders do not want a higher minimum wage, that is the reason why they do not allow a vote on it

The text stated that the republicans are blocking the vote on minimum wage, so my statement was correct


Premise: Also when someone like Daniel Johnson, the present leader of the Quebec Liberal Party who will face the premier in a campaign debate in a few weeks or months, takes a stand on the critical issue of democracy, like he did this week, all the political parties in the House should understand that, by rejecting the Bloc's motion they would be rejecting a well-established consensus in the province.

Hypothesis: The leader is an influential man

All leaders of political parties are influential, and his influence is supported by the speaker saying his views are a representation of the people. This makes my statement correct. The model was probably fooled because my statement is on the borders of neither correct nor incorrect. It's an easy assumption to make because the wording is vague instead of specific


Premise: Let us harness our wealth of wisdom and our desire for truth to work on how to get our marginalized citizens a security of livelihood, the young an opportunity to transform their education into a production mode, and the people of our coastal communities into the dignity of earning their daily bread.

Hypothesis: the speaker is socially progressive caring about the needs of others

The speaker's actions clearly show off her kindness and awareness of the issues faced by society making my statement correct. The model was probably thrown off by the vague wording of my statement


Premise: Historically, government intervention at all levels, but certainly at the national level, played a tremendous role in building the fabric of western Canada from the railway through to the oil and gas business through to the wheat board and all of the areas that are considered to be the jewels of the west.

Hypothesis: Without the support of the government, the nation wouldn't be nearly as successful

The statement lists all the good things that happened as a result of the government making my statement correct. The model probably had issues with my vague statements.


Premise: The Liberal majority disclosed some information contained in the committee report which serves the interests of the federal government and which allowed the Minister of Finance to be in the limelight, to promote his tax reduction initiative and spout propaganda about the federal government's achievements.

Hypothesis: Democrats gave out the information.


Premise: What I'm saying is, is that as we promote life and promote a culture of life, surely there are ways we can work together to reduce the number of abortions: continue to promote adoption laws -- it's a great alternative to abortion -- continue to fund and promote maternity group homes; I will continue to promote abstinence programs.

Hypothesis: Abortion and abstinence are different.

It's clearly stated in the paragraph that the two are different.


Premise: Now, I don't have time to preside over a deposition at this late date. And I know that you respect that. You're experienced counsel and you know that. I do know from my private practice experience that I was extremely loathed to get a judge on the telephone in mid-deposition. That could be one of the most unhappy experiences that a lawyer would have.

Hypothesis: Speaker is a lawyer

The speaker says they are a lawyer and got a call from a judge in mid-deposition.


Premise: The guiding principles contained in the legislation are designed to ensure that the mediator-arbitrator recognizes the directions which have been provided to the employer by the Government of Canada in terms of financial performance and service standards, while at the same time balancing these issues with the importance of good labour relations within the workplace.

Hypothesis: The principles benefited the workers.


Premise: Mr. Lessig, on your First Amendment argument I don't see where the retroactivity-prospectivity comes in, because -- I follow your argument under the Copyright Clause, but if you're saying that the time is too long, the public domain should get this stuff sooner rather than later, would you explain to me how your prospectivity-retrospective line fits into your First Amendment claim?

Hypothesis: Mr. Lessig made an argument which was predicated on a US founding document

This is described in the statement, the system does not know what the constitution is


Premise: There is an enormous amount of work that goes on in committees when members put aside some of their partisanship and focus on how to build an excellent health care system, on how to build a good research and development program and how to deal with issues of equity when you are looking at issues of debt reduction.

Hypothesis: For the greater good the group should put aside their differences so they can get work done

The speaker suggests that groups will get work done if they put aside their differences. This makes my statement correct. The model was probably fooled by my vague word choices


Premise: The bill relates specifically to the fact that under the current provisions of the legislation, if a bill arrives in the hands of a member or a candidate following the election, if it was not received within the required time period in which a candidate or his or her official agent may pay the bill, the only process available now to the member to be able to pay that bill is to get a court order allowing that to happen.

Hypothesis: The bill is something real


Premise: In lending support to what the previous speaker from Peterborough said to a grassroots movement, we are recognizing that the insanity of land mines and the insanity of war that maims hundreds of thousands, indeed millions of people, is something that we must stop and work against.

Hypothesis: The speaker was against fighting

The speaker was definitely against fighting as he was against war


Premise: For three days we joined the anniversary trail ride commemorating the 1874 march west of the original North West Mounted Police contingent; a great adventure which originally took 275 officers and men from Fort Dufferin south of Winnipeg all through the southern part of Saskatchewan and southern Alberta to Fort Whoop-Up 125 years before.

Hypothesis: The trail ride took people from one fort to another commemorating a similar march in 1874.

The adventure took 275 officers and men from Fort Dufferin to Fort Whoop-Up and the text implies someone was joining an anniversary commemorating it.


Premise: Well, we all make mistakes. I've been known to mangle a syllable or two myself, you know, if you know what I mean. I think credibility is important. It is going to be important for the president to be credible with Congress, important for the president to be credible with foreign nations.

Hypothesis: the speaker does not plan to have never made a mistake


Premise: A brown field is an abandoned industrial site that just sits idle in some of our urban centers. And people are willing to invest capital in the brown fields don't want to do so for fear of lawsuit. I think we ought to have federal liability protection, depending upon whether or not standards have been met.

Hypothesis: A brown field was used once for something quite productive

Industry is productive by nature, system assumes otherwise


Premise: One percent of America got $89 billion last year in a tax cut, but people working hard, playing by the rules, trying to take care of their kids, family values, that we're supposed to value so much in America -- I'm tired of politicians who talk about family values and don't value families.

Hypothesis: One percent of Americans had to pay 89 billion dollars less than they would have to pay if there would be no tax cut, so they got to keep a lot more money

The tax cut means they paid 89 million less, so my statement was correct


Premise: I have reviewed the question as originally submitted on October 28 by the hon. member for Delta-South Richmond and have found that proper procedures were followed and that the recommendations to divide his question were made according to Standing Order 39(2) and based on the precedents of this place.

Hypothesis: The question was based on the precedents

It says in the last line that it was based on precedents


Premise: I think there is a privilege here, and I think the privilege sometimes gets drawn in what appears to be an ad hoc manner. But my job is to find where to put the line down in this case. To traipse into the area of why they selectively used a quote as opposed to not using other things that were said I think is to get on a very slippery slope. It really almost precipitates a bias line of questioning, and I'm not going to allow it. I am trying to narrowly draw this.

Hypothesis: The speaker is against what happened.

Reason:  The language is strongly negative.  Why:  There's no mention really of what happened or the speakers views.


Premise: I served on the Small Business Committee for a long time. I was chairman of it once. Now I'm the senior Democrat on it. We used to -- you know, we have a goal there for minority set-aside programs, to try to encourage ownership in the country. They don't reach those goals. They don't even fight to reach those goals. They've tried to undo them.

Hypothesis: The speaker is a Democrat

The speaker states that he or she is the senior Democrat on this committee.


Premise: Mr. Speaker, we are not carrying out a nuclear program with India and Pakistan, but with respect to nuclear reactors that were supplied before the program ended in 1976, we are in the light of the views of the International Atomic Energy Association helping provide information to make sure that these reactors are maintained safely in the interests of civilian populations.

Hypothesis: The program ended after 30 ad

The program ended in 1976, which is very much after 30 ad


Premise: Well, I have no idea. I mean, he can throw out all kinds -- I don't know the particulars of this law. I will tell you I'm the kind of person, I don't hire or fire somebody based upon their sexual orientation. As a matter of fact, I would like to take the issue a little further. I don't really think it's any of my -- you know, any of my concerns what -- how you conduct your sex life. And I think that's a private matter. And I think that's the way it ought to be. But I'm going to be respectful for people, I'll tolerate people, and I support equal rights but not special rights for people.

Hypothesis: someone was confused at one point


Premise: With respect to the lobster and fishing licences purchased by the government for first nations in Atlantic Canada: ( a ) how many licences were purchased, and of these (i) how many were inshore licences; (ii) how many were offshore licences; ( b ) what species are covered by these licences; and ( c ) what bands have been given these licences?

Hypothesis: The government purchased fishing licenses for first nations in Canada that enables them to fish and catch lobsters legally

The canadian government purchased the licenses for first nations in Canada, according to the text so my statement was correct


Premise: No reasonable parent or reasonable member of society would say that 10 or 11 year olds who have a choice to make should not be subject to a strong rehabilitative program and a diversionary program so they can recognize what they have done and then behave more successfully and co-operatively in society.

Hypothesis: parents are very kind to their kids

Parents might indeed be kind to their kids, but this has little to do with the topic statement making it neither correct nor incorrect. I think the vague wording of this statement fooled the model.


Premise: First of all, let me say he's not for a government-run health care system? I thought that's exactly what he and Mrs. Clinton and them fought for in 1993 was a government-run health care system. It was fortunately stopped in its tracks. Secondly, we spend $4.7 billion a year on the uninsured in the State of Texas.

Hypothesis: There aren't a lot of uninsured people in Texas.


Premise: -- that unless there is a -- the Court is -- because the circumstances change, that we are living in an era now where piracy is a significant problem, there's question of administrative ease, of administering a system where copyrights may be different for one set of authors, or different for another set of authors, there's changes that are taking place internationally, so that what we're saying is that not only could this Court conceive of reasons why Congress thought it was accomplishing the objectives of this clause, but that there are numerous objectives that are entirely legitimate in --

Hypothesis: We are living in an era where piracy is a significant problem and that will never change, regardless of copyright laws

The piracy might or might not be a significant problem in the future, so my statement was neither correct or incorrect


Premise: Mr. President, the next question is to you. We all know that Social Security is running out of money, and it has to be fixed. You have proposed to fix it by letting people put some of the money collected to pay benefits into private savings accounts. But the critics are saying that's going to mean finding $1 trillion over the next 10 years to continue paying benefits as those accounts are being set up.

Hypothesis: The preident is going to do something about social security.

The pres is proposing but that doesn't mean he will do something about it.


Premise: The fact is that he did not choose to go to war as a last result. And America now is paying, already $120 billion, up to $200 billion before we're finished and much more probably. And that is the result of this president taking his eye off of Osama bin Laden.

Hypothesis: They were successful in their war.


Premise: Who could claim, without raising an eyebrow, that this system is truly equitable, transparent and accessible, a system that allows corporations, which do not have the right to vote, to meddle in the electoral process by making contributions far beyond the capability of the ordinary voter, and thus unduly influencing the political policy of the parties and the candidates seeking votes?

Hypothesis: the candidates seeking votes dont want any pets

It is not something to discern, whether they want pets or not


Premise: It contains -- the clause itself contains limitations, limited times, authors, exclusive rights and things of that nature. I don't think -- and the petitioners expressly disclaim the assertion that any substantive limitations in the "Promote the- Clause. What the Framers were saying is, we want to give Congress the authority to promote the progress of useful arts and sciences, and --

Hypothesis: Framers were thinking will be the development in the art when is Congress has the authority of useful arts and sciences.

What the Framers were saying is, we want to give Congress the authority to promote the progress of useful arts and sciences but  We don't sure what were Framers were thinking exactly. What is the reason?


Premise: The Auditor General, in his 1997 report, confirmed the importance of habitat restoration; yet this winter the federal government cancelled a mapping and inventory program developed on the coast to standardize essential salmon habitat mapping and inventory services and put displaced fishermen back to work.

Hypothesis: The auditor general will get free fish for life.

There is no knowing if he will get free fish.


Premise: I suggest to the members opposite that what they really should be focusing on here is to let farmers, the ten members, the majority of members who will be sitting on that board, do their job and let them provide the Canadian Wheat Board with the leadership in concert with the Government of Canada, in concert with all the people of Canada, the best options for all farmers.

Hypothesis: The Canadian Wheat Board has a dozen members.

It doesn't list exactly how many members are on the Canadian Wheat Board.


Premise: Honourable senators will remember that the committee which reported just prior to Christmas received information about a number of cases in which claims were brought by people living in poverty in Canada, usually women and children, both alluded to by my colleagues who spoke before me, against our federal and provincial governments.

Hypothesis: People living in poverty in Canada are joyful

Just because you live in poverty, that alone doesn't mean you can't experience joy


Premise: Well, Justice, that certainly is the reason the Government offers for this pattern. It, of course, doesn't explain actually what Congress has done and, even in this case, when a work has passed into the public domain, then there is precisely the same week before/week after problem that you advert to, that extension does not extend to all subsisting works, it only extends to all subsisting copyrights. So that line is already drawn in the practice that Congress has adopted, but our point is, the only way to assure --

Hypothesis: The US congress is always in the United states, in it's entirety.

narrative never speaks about the location of all members of congress


Premise: And the compounding rate of interest effect will make it more likely that the Social Security system is solvent for our children and our grandchildren. I will work with Republicans and Democrats. It'll be a vital issue in my second term. It is an issue that I am willing to take on, and so I'll bring Republicans and Democrats together.

Hypothesis: The author of the quote is a man.

Based on the information provided it is obvious that the author of the quote is a politician, but it is impossible to say if they are a man or a woman. Because of that the statement that the author of the quote is a man is neither correct nor incorrect, because it is impossible to be determined based on the information provided. I think the system got tricked because most politicians are men and maybe the quote sounds more like something a man would say.


Premise: And to make sure our society is as hopeful as it possibly can be, every single child in America must be educated. I mean every child. It starts with making sure every child learns to read. K-2 diagnostic testing so we know whether or not there's a deficiency.

Hypothesis: americas children do not want to be educated

narrative does not specify children's intent, system assumes so


Premise: Thirdly, one of the reasons why there's still high cost in medicine is because this is -- they don't use any information technology. It's like if you looked at the -- it's the equivalent of the buggy and horse days, compared to other industries here in America.

Hypothesis: People admire america's heath system

The answer to whether people admire or don't admire the health system in america is one that is not explicitly answered in the passage above. It is possible but it isn't known by this passage.


Premise: In my home province of Prince Edward Island during one year alone there were 6,845 calls received by Transition House Association; 1,201 calls received by the Child Abuse Line; and 757 new cases opened by Victims Services, of which 108 were sexual abuse cases, 242 wife abuse cases, and 46 other family abuse cases.

Hypothesis: The police closed all of the cases.

It isn't known how many of the cases were closed.


Premise: On August 19, 1999, I received a letter from Dr. Chopra in which he states that, "I mentioned that all these actions were the direct consequence of my testimony, which I was requested (required) to give before the Standing Senate Committee on Agriculture and Forestry for its bovine growth hormone rBST investigations."

Hypothesis: Dr. Chopra received a letter on August 19.

Dr. Chopra mailed the letter. He didn't receive it.


Premise: Can I ask you about one of the limits, just focusing on the Copyright Clause and the progress of science and useful arts? In your view, does that -- is that limited to encouraging creativity by authors and inventors, or does it also include the distribution of materials that might not otherwise be distributed, like old films and so forth?

Hypothesis: The narrator didn't ask permission to ask the question.

The first question is asking for permission.


Premise: Pandanus tectorius is a species of "Pandanus" (screwpine) that is native to Malesia, eastern Australia, and the Pacific Islands. It grows in the coastal lowlands typically near the edge of the ocean. Common names in English include Tahitian screwpine, thatch screwpine., hala tree; pandanus, and pu hala in Hawaiian. The fruit is sometimes known as hala fruit.

Hypothesis: even in hawaii people know about screwpine fruit


Premise: Cheektowaga is a suburban community and census-designated place (CDP) in Erie County, New York, United States. The population was 75,178 at the 2010 census, making it the most populous census-designated place in New York. It is within the town of Cheektowaga. The CDP includes Buffalo Niagara International Airport.

Hypothesis: Cheektowage is not too far from Buffalo

It includes the buffalo airport, so it can't be far


Premise: Jonathan Samuels (born 1972) is a British broadcaster and journalist. He is currently the co-anchor on Sky News Sunrise since 17 October 2016. Previously he has held a range of different Senior correspondent posts for "Sky News", the 24-hour television news service operated by Sky Television, part of Sky plc. He was based in Sydney from 2011 to 2014.

Hypothesis: Jonathan Samuels was born in the 70's

He was born in 1972, so he was indeed born in the 70's


Premise: "Say "I Gotta Believe!"" is a single by De La Soul featuring Japanese singer Double. The song was released as part of the soundtrack for the popular Japanese videogame, "PaRappa the Rapper 2". Outside Japan, copies of the single are extremely rare. The song received a promotional video, which featured the group as chefs, mixed with clips of PaRappa.

Hypothesis: PaRappa the Rapper 2 is popular.

I'm not sure why it was difficult. The writing states that the title was a "popular Japanese videogame" so therefore PaRappa the Rapper 2 is popular. the statement is correct.


Premise: Christine Milne led the Australian Greens from 2012 until 2015. During this period, a select number of members of the parliamentary party served as official spokespersons for the party both inside and outside of Parliament on various issues, each member being assigned portfolios for their speaking duties. This allows the Greens to shadow government policies and actions from the party perspective.

Hypothesis: . This allows the Greens to hide government policies and actions from the party perspective.

I think shadow in this context means hide.


Premise: "Brooklyn Baby" is a song by American singer and songwriter Lana Del Rey for her third studio album "Ultraviolence" (2014). It was written by Del Rey, and Barrie O'Neill, while production was handled by Dan Auerbach. The song was released on June 8, 2014, by Polydor Records and Interscope Records, as the fourth single from "Ultraviolence".

Hypothesis: Lana Del Rey released an album in the summer.

June is a summer month, and the singer released an album in June 2014.


Premise: Sunday Live with Adam Boulton was a weekend news and political show on Sky News and on Sky News HD, presented by Sky News' Political Editor Adam Boulton. From January 2011, the programme was replaced with "Murnaghan", a similar show presented by Dermot Murnaghan. Boulton moved to a new weekday show at 13:00 on Sky News.

Hypothesis: it was rather political in nature

The context states that the show was political. The model most certainly got it wrong because it couldn't figure out what I was referring to when I said 'it'


Premise: Philippe von Stauffenberg, also known as "PVS", (born 1964) is a German businessman, residing in London, United Kingdom. He is the Managing Partner of Solidus Partners LLP, which he founded in 2004. Solidus Partners is a private equity firm, which makes investments in Media and Green Technologies.

Hypothesis: Philippe was born on an even numbered year.

He was born in 1964. I'm not sure why the system missed this one.


Premise: Robert Alexander Crookston Laidlaw {'1': ", '2': ", '3': ", '4': "} (8 September 1885 – 12 March 1971) was a New Zealand business man who founded the Farmers Trading Company, one of the largest department store chains in New Zealand. He was also a Christian writer and philanthropist and a well-known lay preacher in the Open Brethren movement.

It says in the context: " Farmers Trading Company, one of the largest department store chains in New Zealand."                                                                                So,  it is one of the largest department stores ( successful)                                                                                It is in the country New Zealand, on the continent of Oceania.                                                                    Therefore, the statement "The Farmers Trading Company is a successful department store in Oceania"                   Is DEFINITELY CORRECT


Premise: Belinda Jane Cordwell (born 21 September 1965) is a sports commentator and a former professional tennis player from New Zealand, who represented her native country at the 1988 Summer Olympics in Seoul, South Korea. There she lost in the first round of the women's singles competition to Great Britain's Sara Gomer.

Hypothesis: Cordwell competed at the 1988 Summer Olympics when in her 20s.

Cordwell was born in 1965 so she was about 23 at the 1988 Summer Olympics; maybe the model doesn't understand being in your 20s.


Premise: Marcel Seip (] ; born 5 April 1982) is a Dutch former professional footballer who plays as a centre back for ACV in the Dutch Hoofdklasse. He previously played for Veendam, Heerenveen, Plymouth Argyle, Blackpool, Sheffield United, Charlton Athletic, Bradford City, VVV Venlo, Central Coast Mariners and FC Emmen.

Hypothesis: Marcel Seip is over 30


Premise: Maria Severa Onofriana (July 26, 1820November 30, 1846), also known simply as A Severa, is regarded as the first fado singer to have risen to fame, attaining a near-mythical status after her death. Fado has been described as the Portuguese expression of 'the blues,' and fado roughly means fate.

Hypothesis: She died at 26 years old.

her birthday is July 26, 1820 and death date of November 30 1846, which would make her 26 years old at the time of death


Premise: USS "PC-1168" was a "PC-461"-class submarine chaser built for the United States Navy during World War II. "PC-1168" is notable for being the ship on which the film "You're in the Navy Now", which starred Gary Cooper, was filmed in 1950. The ship was later transferred to the Republic of China Navy, serving from 1954 to 1970 as ROCS "Ching Kiang" (PC-116).

Hypothesis: USS "PC-1168 saw action in WW2


Premise: From Monday to Sunday is the fourth solo album by English singer-songwriter Nick Heyward. It was released in 1993 through Epic Records and produced two singles, ‘’Kite’’ (#44 in the UK Singles Chart, #4 in Billboard’s Hot Modern Rock Tracks chart) and ‘’He Doesn’t Love You Like I Do’’ (#58 in the UK Singles Chart).

Hypothesis: From Monday to Sunday did well at the billboards


Premise: Metalocalypse: The Doomstar Requiem - A Klok Opera is a rock opera special for the Adult Swim animated series Metalocalypse. It was announced on May 10, 2013, by Adult Swim and was released on October 27, 2013. The special picks up directly after "Metalocalypse" season 4. It featured all new music from Dethklok, which was released on a soundtrack album on October 29, 2013.

Hypothesis: A Klok Opera will be going on once the fourth of the season Metalocalypse has finished up.

This has stated it will go on direct after season 4, but I feel the agent had a hard time as I didn't key the actual number of the season, but word.


Premise: The Beretta 93R is a selective-fire machine pistol, designed and manufactured by Italian firearms manufacturer Beretta in the 1970s for police and military use, that is derived from their semi-automatic Beretta 92. The "R" stands for "Raffica", which is Italian for "volley", "flurry", or "burst" (sometimes spoken "R" as ""Rapid"" in English).

Hypothesis: In the 1970s, the Beretta 93R was used in Italy, but not by civilians.

The Beretta was used by military and police, and wasn't sold to civilians. This may be difficult because the original context never explicitly mentioned civilians, but a gun developed for military and police couldn't be purchased by civilians then.


Premise: Kevin Reece Wilson (born October 23, 1961) is an American football coach and former player who is the current offensive coordinator at Ohio State University. Wilson served as the head football coach at Indiana University Bloomington from 2011 to 2016 and was the offensive coordinator at the University of Oklahoma from 2002 to 2010.

Hypothesis: Wilson was born the year after 1960.

Wilson was born in 1961. The system was confused by the year.


Premise: "What's in It for Me" is a song written by Gary Burr and John Jarrard, and recorded by American country music artist John Berry. It was released in June 1994 as the fourth single from the album "John Berry". The song reached number 5 on the U.S. "Billboard" Hot Country Singles & Tracks chart and peaked at number 2 on the Canadian "RPM" Country Tracks chart.

Hypothesis: Gary Burr wrote some lyrics for the album "John Barry"

Gary Burr wrote lyrics for a song that appeared on the album therefore he wrote lyrics that appeared on the album


Premise: Allium gilgiticum is an Asian species of onion, a rare and quite possibly extinct species. It is known only from the type collection, gathered in the 1930s in Gilgit District in Pakistan, high in the Himalayas, part of the Kashmir region long disputed with India. The plant is about 50 cm tall, with a hemispheric umbel of purple flowers.

Hypothesis: Allium gilgiticum is food


Premise: The Secret of My Success (sometimes stylized as "The Secret of My Succe$s") is a 1987 American comedy film produced and directed by Herbert Ross, and starring Michael J. Fox and Helen Slater. The screenplay was written by A.J. Carothers, Jim Cash and Jack Epps, Jr. from a story written by Carothers.

Hypothesis: The story of the film was written by 1 person.

The story was written by AJ Carothers, so it was written by one person, the screenplay was written by more than one person though.


Premise: 2 is a compilation album of songs by the Spanish band Dover, released in 2007. It is a double CD greatest hits compilation from the band including singles: "Serenade", "Devil Came To Me" and "Loli Jackson" and featuring many singles and favourites from their past albums.

Hypothesis: The CD was released after the events of 9/11

9/11 happened in the year 2001 and the cd was released in 2007.


Premise: TNT is a Norwegian heavy metal band from Trondheim, formed in 1982. The band has released twelve studio albums, three EPs and three live albums while going through numerous line-up changes since its formation. Guitarist Ronni Le Tekrø is the only consistent member of TNT. TNT has sold between 4-5 million albums worldwide as of 2016.

Hypothesis: TNT has released between 2 and 4 live albums.

The agent statement states that TNT has released three live albums. Because three is between 2 and 4, the statement: TNT has released between 2 and 4 live albums is definitely correct.


Premise: Bashar Mounzer Rahal (Bulgarian: Башар Мунзер Рахал , Arabic: بشار رحال  ) is a Bulgarian actor of Lebanese descent, known for his role in the TV show "It Can't Be" equivalent of "Saturday Night Live". Most recently he can be seen alongside John Cusack, Hilary Duff and Academy Award Winners Ben Kingsley, Marisa Tomei and Joan Cusack in the movie "War, Inc.".

Hypothesis: Bashar Mounzer Rahal is Lebanese

It is correct because it literally states he is of Lebanese descent. He could be Bulgarian as well, but he is at least Lebanese, as stated in the prompt. I think the system thinks he is Bulgarian since that is listed first and that he couldn't be from any other descent


Premise: Elim, also known as the Dr. William Keil House, is a historic home located near Bethel, Shelby County, Missouri. It was built in the late-1840s, and is a 2 1/2-story, brick and stone dwelling over a full basement. It has a simple ridge roof and two porches. It was built by the members of the "Society of Bethel" and served as the residence of the society's founder Dr. William Keil (1812-1877).

Hypothesis: Elim was built prior to the American Civil War.

The text states the house was built in the late 1840s.


Premise: The Schweizerischer Niederlaufhund (FCI No, 60) (translated into English as the Small Swiss Hound, is a breed of dog of the scenthound type from Switzerland. "Niederlaufhund" means short-legged hound. The breed has a number of different varieties (all of the same breed).

Hypothesis: Schweizerischer Niederlaufhund is not in English,

The Schweizerischer Niederlaufhund is pre translation and therefore not in English. I think this confused the system.


Premise: The Good Mother is a 1988 American drama film and an adaptation of Sue Miller's novel of the same name. Directed by Leonard Nimoy, the film stars Diane Keaton and Liam Neeson in the leading roles. "The Good Mother" explores feelings and beliefs about children's exposure to adult sexuality and challenges society's growing reliance upon courts to settle complex private and ethical matters.

Hypothesis: The Good Mother is not describing a mom


Premise: The New Orleans Regional Transit Authority (RTA or NORTA) is a public transportation agency based in New Orleans. Since 1983 it has operated bus and historic streetcar service throughout the city. With an annual ridership of over 18.6 million riders, the Regional Transit Authority is the largest public transit agency in the state of Louisiana.

Hypothesis: bus and street car services became part of he New Orleans Regional Transit Authority (RTA or NORTA) offering in 1983 with a yearly turn over close to 19 million passengers

the statement states that their riders every yearis over 18.6 million


Premise: Papyrus Oxyrhynchus 22 (P. Oxy. 22) contains fragments of the "Oedipus Tyrannus" by Sophocles, written in Greek. It was discovered by Grenfell and Hunt in 1897 in Oxyrhynchus. The fragment is dated to the fifth century. It is housed in the British Library (Department of Manuscripts). The text was published by Grenfell and Hunt in 1898.

Hypothesis: The fragment was made in the 400s.

The fifth century is the 400s, not the 500s.


Premise: Daniel Alexander "Danny" Hultzen (born November 28, 1989) is an American professional baseball pitcher who is currently a free agent. Hultzen attended the University of Virginia, where he starred for the Virginia Cavaliers baseball team. He was drafted and selected second overall by the Seattle Mariners in the 2011 MLB draft.

Hypothesis: Currently his contract ended

Being a free agent means you are not to a team currently and that means your contract with your previous team ended


Premise: Leila Meskhi (Georgian: ლეილა მესხი ; born 5 January 1968) is a retired Georgian professional female tennis player. She was ranked World No. 12 on 5 August 1991. Her best performance at a Grand Slam came when she got to the quarter finals of the 1990 US Open, defeating Akiko Kijimuta, Natasha Zvereva, Katia Piccolini and Linda Ferrando before losing to eventual champion Gabriela Sabatini.

Hypothesis: Leila was 22 during the 1990 US Open.

it is correct because 1990 minus 1968 is 22 but the AI thought new information was added so marked it as neither.


Premise: Ilinka Mitreva (Macedonian: Илинка Митрева ) (born 11 February 1950 in Skopje) is a former foreign minister of the Republic of Macedonia. She was first appointed to that position in May 2001, but resigned in November 2001. However, she was reappointed in November 2002, and held the position until August 2006, when a new government took office after parliamentary elections.

Hypothesis: Ilinka Mitreva can wear pants


Premise: China Kong (born 1960) is an American actor, writer, and producer. She is the widow of director Donald Cammell, having met him when she was 14 years of age and he was 40 years of age in 1974. After having an affair, the two would wed 4 years later in 1978.

Hypothesis: Donald Cammell passed away.

She is the widow of director Donald Cammell, so he passed away at some point. The model may not know what a widow is or what it means to pass away.


Premise: Joanne Froggatt (born 23 August 1980) is an English actress of stage, television, and film. From 2010, she played lady's maid Anna Bates in all six seasons of the period drama "Downton Abbey". For this role, she received three Primetime Emmy Award nominations for Outstanding Supporting Actress in a Drama Series and won the Golden Globe Award for Best Supporting Actress on Television in 2014.

Hypothesis: Froggatt has lost an Emmy award.

Froggatt was nominated, but did not win, an Emmy three times; thus, she has lost an Emmy award.


Premise: The 337 Squadron (Norwegian: "337-skvadronen" ) is a maritime helicopter unit of the Royal Norwegian Air Force (RNoAF). Based at Bardufoss Air Station, the squadron operates eight NHIndustries NH90. The helicopters are used by the Norwegian Coast Guard and serve on the "Nordkapp"-class, the "Barentshav"-class and on NoCGV "Svalbard".

Hypothesis: The 337 squadron is from a country next to Finland.


Premise: The Free State Division of the High Court of South Africa (previously named the Orange Free State Provincial Division and the Free State High Court, and commonly known as the Bloemfontein High Court) is a superior court of law with general jurisdiction over the Free State province of South Africa. The division sits at Bloemfontein.

Hypothesis: Bloemfontein High Court official name doesn't have the word "Bloemfontein" in it

Bloemfontein High Court is an unofficial alias


Premise: "Some Velvet Morning" is a song written by Lee Hazlewood and originally recorded by Hazlewood and Nancy Sinatra in late 1967. It first appeared on Sinatra's album "Movin' with Nancy," the soundtrack to her 1967 television special of the same name, which also featured a performance of the song.

Hypothesis: Some Velvet Morning was recorded on an odd numbered year


Premise: Northern Kings was a Finnish symphonic metal cover supergroup, made up of four well known musicians: Jarkko Ahola from Teräsbetoni, ex-Dreamtale, Marco Hietala from Nightwish and Tarot, Tony Kakko from Sonata Arctica and Juha-Pekka Leppäluoto from Charon and Harmaja.

Hypothesis: Marco Hietala is not from Nightwish and Sonata Arctica.

Actually, Marco Hietala is from Nightwish and Tarot, not Sonata Arctica. The model was fooled because the statement was half righ.


Premise: The Pasco County Courthouse (constructed in 1909) is a historic site in Dade City, Florida, located at 37918 Meridian Avenue. It was designed by noted architect Edward Columbus Hosford in the Classical Revival style. On September 20, 2006, it was added to the U.S. National Register of Historic Places.

Hypothesis: The Pasco County Courthouse was constructed the year after 1908.

The Pasco County Courthouse was constructed in 1909. The system was confused by the year.


Premise: Franklin Johnson Foil (born October 31, 1964) is a Republican member of the Louisiana House of Representatives for District 70, which includes a portion of Baton Rouge. In 2008, he succeeded term-limited Republican Representative Carl Crane, the former chairman of the House Education Committee. To win the seat, Foil defeated fellow Republican attorney Pat Culbertson.

Hypothesis: Baton Rouge is the capital of Louisiana.

Baton Rouge is indeed the capital of the state of Louisiana. The system was fooled by this statement because it did not take the geography of the state into account.


Premise: No. 234 Squadron RAF had a long career within the RAF, being operational on flying boats in World War I and on fighter aircraft in World War II. After the war it remained a fighter unit till 1957. In its last incarnation the squadron was in turn Operational Training Unit (OTU), Tactical Weapon Unit (TWU) and part of No. 4 Flying Training School RAF until lastly disbanded in 1994.

Hypothesis: No. 234 Squadron RA had a good career

The passage mentioned that No. 234 Squadron RA has long career.


Premise: Émile Bertrand Mbamba (born 27 October 1982 in Yaoundé) is a Cameroonian football striker, who currently plays for Indonesia Super League side Persebaya Surabaya. He also played for Vitesse Arnhem, Maccabi Tel Aviv, Maccabi Petah Tikva, Vitória Setúbal, Arema Malang, Daegu FC and Botev Plovdiv.

Hypothesis: Mbamba was born the year after 1981.

Mbamba was born in 1982. The system was confused by the year.


Premise: Anderson Souza Conceição (born 1 February 1994), known as Anderson Talisca or simply Talisca, is a Brazilian professional footballer who plays for Turkish club Beşiktaş, on loan from Portuguese club Benfica. He can play as an attacking midfielder or a forward.

Hypothesis: Anderson Souza Conceição is from south america


Premise: Alkali Lake is a geographic sink in Lake County, Oregon, United States. It is in the Alkali Subbasin of the Summer Lake Basin watershed in southeastern Oregon, located 26 miles east of Christmas Valley, Oregon, northeast of Lake Abert, to the immediate west of Abert Rim and Highway 395.

Hypothesis: Alkali Lake is located to the East of the Pacific Ocean.

Alkali Lake is located in Oregon which is East of the Pacific Ocean and, therefore, must mean that a like contained within Oregon is also East of the Pacific Ocean.


Premise: The River Ure is a river in North Yorkshire, England, approximately 74 mi long from its source to the point where it changes name to the River Ouse. It is the principal river of Wensleydale, which is the only one of the major Dales now named after a village rather than its river. The old name for the valley was Yoredale after the river that runs through it.

Hypothesis: The river is located in a town with the abbreviation NY

North yorkshire abbreviated is NY, therefor making it correct. I think the model is confused by abbreviations


Premise: Nonnie Griffin was born in 1933 in Canada. She studied at the Toronto Conservatory in her native land, the Royal Academy of Dramatic Arts in London, and even with famed mime artist Marcel Marceau. Her stage work includes playing Mrs. Rafi in the original Toronto production of "The Sea" and a 10-month run as the title character in "Hello, Dolly!" at the Limelight Dinner Theatre in Toronto in 1990.

Hypothesis: Nonnie Griffin played a character named Dolly in a production.

The statement is in the correct category because the excerpt says that Griffin played the -title- character in "Hello, Dolly!", which would have been Dolly. The system may have had difficulty because the excerpt doesn't directly state that Dolly was a character.


Premise: The Abbottabad University of Science and Technology (also named "AUST"), is a public university located in Havelian (12 km from Abbottabad), Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. The University offers admissions in "Bachelors", "Masters", "MS/M. Phill" and "PHD" programs.

Hypothesis: you can receive a PHD at the school

The University offers admissions in "Bachelors", "Masters", "MS/M. Phill" and "PHD" programs. So you could actually get a PHD degree.


Premise: Betty Currie (born Betty Grace Williams; November 10, 1939) is the former personal secretary for Bill Clinton (during his tenure as President of the United States). She became well known as a figure in the Lewinsky scandal for her alleged handling of gifts given to Monica Lewinsky by President Clinton.

Hypothesis: Betty Currie was a secretary in the 90's.

Bill Clinton was president during the 90's.


Premise: Occupy Comics: Art & Stories Inspired by Occupy Wall Street is a currently-in-production, deluxe comic book anthology funded on Kickstarter and seeking to articulate themes of the Occupy Wall Street movement through comics as well as to fund-raise on behalf of the protesters.

Hypothesis: Occupy Comics will not be in-production in the next five years.

I believe that my statement belongs in the "neither definitely correct nor definitely incorrect" category because even though we know that it is currently in-production, there is no guarantee that it will be in-production in the next five years.


Premise: Anthony "Tony" Ulasewicz (December 14, 1918 in New York, United States – December 17, 1997 in Glens Falls, New York) was a figure in the Watergate scandal, delivering hundreds of thousands of dollars in "hush money" to Watergate defendants G. Gordon Liddy and E. Howard Hunt. He also investigated the lives of notable Democrats like Senator Edward M. Kennedy. He was of Polish descent.

Hypothesis: Tony knew a lot about the Kennedies.

Even though the context tells us Tony investigated the Kennedies, we do not know the extent of the information Tony gathered about them.


Premise: Dufton is a village and civil parish in Cumbria, England. Historically part of Westmorland, it lies in the Eden Valley and below Great Dun Fell. It is mostly around 180m above sea level. At the 2001 census the parish had a population of 169, increasing to 204 at the 2011 Census.

Hypothesis: In 2002, Dufton parish in Cumbria, England had a population of exactly 175.

There is not enough data in the text to indicate whether this is definitely correct or definitely false - it could go either way.


Premise: Stephan Lichtsteiner (born 16 January 1984) is a Swiss professional footballer who plays for Italian club Juventus and the Switzerland national team. An attacking right-back or wing-back, he is known for his energetic runs down the right wing, as well as his stamina and athleticism, which earned him the nicknames "Forrest Gump" and "The Swiss Express".

Hypothesis: Football is played mainly with one's feet.

Football as European countries refer to it is what Americans of the USA refer to as soccer, which is a sport mainly involved with kicking a ball with one's feet. Football as Americans of the USA refer to it is a sport mainly concerned with carrying the ball instead of kicking it.


Premise: Robert Cortez Scott (born April 30, 1947) is the U.S. Representative for Virginia 's 3 congressional district , serving since 1993. He is a member of the Democratic Party. The district takes in most of Richmond, all of Portsmouth, along with most of the black-majority areas of Norfolk, Hampton and Scott's home in Newport News. Scott is the current dean of the Virginia Congressional delegation.

Hypothesis: Person at subject was born in the country below Canada

The text never explicitly ever say that he was born in the United States


Premise: Damien Keyeux is a film editor with more than thirty film credits. His credits include "The Barons" (2009), "Illegal" (2010), "When Pigs Have Wings" (2011), "Horses of God" (2012), "Much Loved" (2015) and "Trainee Day" (2016). He received the Magritte Award for Best Editing for his work in "The Marchers" (2013).

Hypothesis: Damien Keyeux work can be seen on the small screen


Premise: Nick Tandy (born 5 November 1984) is a professional British racing driver currently racing for Porsche Motorsport as a factory driver in the FIA World Endurance Championship LMP1 class. He won the 2015 24 Hours of Le Mans with co-drivers Earl Bamber and Nico Hülkenberg.

Hypothesis: Nick Tandy was born in the United States

The context says he was British but that does not necessarily mean he was born there


Premise: Zoey Patricia Bartlet is a fictional character played by Elisabeth Moss on the television serial drama "The West Wing". Zoey is the youngest of President Josiah Bartlet and Abbey Bartlet's three daughters, and is featured more prominently in the series than either of her sisters.

Hypothesis: Zoey has twin sisters.

Zoey has two sisters, so they could be twins. The model might assume the statement means Zoey is a twin, which is unlikely [but not impossible] given she is 'youngest'.


Premise: Ray Point is a small rural unincorporated community in Live Oak County, Texas, United States. It is a German farming community typical for much of Texas. The most prominent remaining structures are the Ray Point community center and the Ray Point Mercantile (closed). Nearby is the Ray Point cemetery. The nearest city is Three Rivers.

Hypothesis: Ray Point is a very peaceful city

The passage did not mentioned anything about the peacefulness in Ray Point. So the statement could be correct or incorrect


Premise: Quick Chek is a privately owned, Whitehouse Station, New Jersey based chain of convenience stores with 140 stores in New Jersey and New York. The first store opened in Dunellen, New Jersey in 1967, and has since then grown into a chain. Several stores include pharmacies, gas stations, and liquor departments.

Hypothesis: only one Quick Chek was in business until 1983

it is not known when they expanded, only that is has happened by now


Premise: Gillot was a 17th/18th-century French theatre manager and playwright about whom we have no information except that he wrote farces and puppets plays for the Théâtre de la foire Saint-Germain at the turn of the 17th and 18th centuries. We have four burlesque plays by him whose main character is Pulcinella from the commedia dell'arte:

Hypothesis: He wrote farces and puppets plays for the Théâtre de la foire Saint-Germain twice.


Premise: Stabat Mater in F minor, D 383, is a musical setting of the "Stabat Mater" sequence, composed by Franz Schubert in 1816. It is scored for soprano, tenor and bass soloists, SATB choir, 2 flutes, 2 oboes, 2 bassoons, contrabassoon, 2 french horns, 3 trombones, violin I and II, viola, cello and double bass.

Hypothesis: Franz Schubert could play the violin

The context only states that the composition consists of a violin, it doesn't say that Franz Schubert could play a violin. He may have got someone else to play it for him. The system likely assumed because the piece contains a violin, Franz Schubert must be able to play it.