Company Stock Performance The following graph shows a comparison of cumulative total shareholder return, calculated on a dividend-reinvested basis, for the Company, the S&P 500 Index, the S&P Information Technology Index and the Dow Jones U. S.  Technology Supersector Index for the five years ended September 29, 2018.
The graph assumes $100 was invested in each of the Company’s common stock, the S&P 500 Index, the S&P Information Technology Index and the Dow Jones U. S.  Technology Supersector Index as of the market close on September 27, 2013.
Note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.
## Table 0 ##
$100 invested on September 27, 2013 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends.
Data points are the last day of each fiscal year for the Company’s common stock and September 30th for indexes.
Copyright?2018 Standard & Poor’s, a division of S&P Global.
All rights reserved.
Copyright?2018 S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, a division of S&P Global.
All rights reserved.
Additionally segment profit in 2003 was adversely impacted by temporary plant shutdowns in our Fluorocarbons and Nylon System businesses.
Specialty Materials segment profit in 2003 increased by 51 percent compared with 2002 due mainly to the impact of the prior year write-down of property, plant and equipment in several businesses, the benefits of cost actions including synergies from the nylon transaction, divestitures of non-strategic businesses and higher sales volumes.
The increase was partially offset by higher raw material costs (mainly natural gas and phenol resulting from increases in benzene prices) and the impact of the temporary plant shutdowns in our Fluorocarbons and Nylon System businesses.
Trends which may impact Specialty Materials operating results in 2005 include: ?
Continued excess global capacity in the production of nylon.
The Nylon System business did not perform in accordance with our operating plan in 2004.
We have taken certain repositioning actions in 2004 (see repositioning section of this MD&A) and are evaluating other alternatives.
Additionally, we continue to evaluate strategic alternatives to maximize the value of this business.  ?
Degree of volatility in significant raw material costs (natural gas and benzene).  ?
Extent of change in order rates from global semiconductor customers.
Transportation Systems
## Table 1 ##
favorable sales mix and higher volumes of 12 percent and the favorable effect of foreign exchange of 6 percent.
The increase in sales for the segment resulted principally from a 29 percent increase in sales in our Honeywell Turbo Technologies business due to a favorable sales mix and volume growth driven by increasing diesel penetration in Europe and strength in the North American truck segment, and the favorable effect of foreign exchange.
Sales for our Consumer Products Group business increased by 7 percent driven by strong retail demand for our high-end products and recent introductions of new Autolite, FRAM and Prestone products and the favorable effect of foreign exchange and higher prices (offsetting incremental ethylene glycol raw material costs).
Sales for our Friction Materials business increased by 7 percent largely due to the favorable effect of foreign exchange.
Transportation Systems sales in 2003 increased by 15 percent compared with 2002 due mainly to the favorable effects of foreign exchange of 9 percent and a favorable sales mix and volume growth of 5 percent.
The increase resulted mainly from a 27 percent increase in sales in our Honeywell Turbo Technologies business due to a favorable sales mix and volume growth of 15 percent as worldwide demand for our turbochargers continued to be strong and the favorable effect of foreign exchange of 12 percent.
Transportation Systems segment profit in 2004 increased by 25 percent compared with 2003 due primarily to the effect of favorable sales mix and volume growth in our Honeywell Turbo Technologies business partially offset by higher raw material costs (mostly steel and other metals in each of the segment’s businesses and ethylene glycol in our Consumer Products Group business).
Transportation Systems segment profit in 2003 increased by 17 percent compared with 2002 as the effect of higher sales in our Honeywell Turbo Technologies business was partially offset by higher new product development and introduction and facility relocations expenses, and lower aftermarket sales at our Friction Materials business.
Trends which may impact Transportation Systems operating results in 2005 include:
MetLife, Inc.  Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements — (Continued) Net Investment Gains (Losses) The components of net investment gains (losses) were as follows
## Table 2 ##
(1) Investment portfolio gains (losses) for the year ended December 31, 2011 includes intent-to-sell impairments of ($154) million as a result of the pending disposition of certain operations of MetLife Bank and the Caribbean Business.
See Note 2.
(2) Other gains (losses) includes a loss of $87 million and $209 million for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, related to the sale of the Company’s investment in MSI MetLife.
See Note 2.
Other gains (losses) for the year ended December 31, 2011 includes a goodwill impairment loss of $65 million and a loss of $19 million related to the Company’s pending sale of the Caribbean Business.
See Notes 2 and 7.
See “— Variable Interest Entities” for discussion of CSEs included in the table above.
Gains (losses) from foreign currency transactions included within net investment gains (losses) were $37 million, $230 million and $226 million for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Proceeds from sales or disposals of fixed maturity and equity securities and the components of fixed maturity and equity securities net investment gains (losses) were as shown in the table below.
Investment gains and losses on sales of securities are determined on a specific identification basis.
## Table 3 ##
Our revenues decreased $1,035 million, or 7.4%, for the year ended December 31, 2015.
Our revenue decline was driven by (i) divestitures in 2014, principally our Wheelabrator business in December 2014, our Puerto Rico operations in the second quarter of 2014, and certain landfill and collection operations in our Eastern Canada Area in the third quarter of 2014; (ii) lower volumes; (iii) lower revenues from our fuel surcharge program due to declining fuel costs; (iv) lower recyclable commodity prices and (v) foreign currency translation, which affects revenues from our Canadian operations.
Partially offsetting these revenue declines were (i) revenue growth from yield on our collection and disposal operations and (ii) revenue from acquired operations, primarily the Deffenbaugh acquisition in March 2015.
Our revenues increased $13 million, or 0.1%, for the year ended December 31, 2014, driven by (i) revenue growth from yield on our collection and disposal operations; (ii) revenue from acquired operations, particularly the RCI operations acquired in July 2013 and (iii) fluctuations in electricity prices at Wheelabrator’s merchant waste-to-energy facilities that favorably affected revenues.
Offsetting these revenue increases were (i) revenue declines due to lower volumes; (ii) divestitures in 2014, primarily our Puerto Rico operations, our Wheelabrator business and certain landfill and collection operations in our Eastern Canada Area; (iii) foreign currency translation and (iv) revenue declines resulting from lower recyclable commodity prices.
The following provides further details associated with our period-to-period change in revenues.
Average yield Collection and disposal average yield — This measure reflects the effect on our revenue from the pricing activities of our collection, transfer and landfill operations, exclusive of volume changes.
Revenue growth from collection and disposal average yield includes not only base rate changes and environmental and service fee increases, but also (i) certain average price changes related to the overall mix of services, which are due to the types of services provided; (ii) changes in average price from new and lost business and (iii) price decreases to retain customers.
Revenue growth from collection and disposal average yield was $203 million, or 1.8%, and $262 million, or 2.3%, for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Our year-over-year yield growth was driven largely by our continued focus on our pricing strategy with lower rollbacks and improved new business pricing.
We experienced growth in all three of our principal collection lines of business in both 2015 and 2014.
The details are as follows (dollars in millions):

Tables referenced above, in order (Table 0 first):
<table><tr><td></td><td>September2013</td><td>September2014</td><td>September2015</td><td>September2016</td><td>September2017</td><td>September2018</td></tr><tr><td>Apple Inc.</td><td>$100</td><td>$149</td><td>$173</td><td>$174</td><td>$242</td><td>$359</td></tr><tr><td>S&P 500 Index</td><td>$100</td><td>$120</td><td>$119</td><td>$137</td><td>$163</td><td>$192</td></tr><tr><td>S&P Information Technology Index</td><td>$100</td><td>$129</td><td>$132</td><td>$162</td><td>$209</td><td>$275</td></tr><tr><td>Dow Jones U.S. Technology Supersector Index</td><td>$100</td><td>$130</td><td>$130</td><td>$159</td><td>$203</td><td>$266</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td></td><td> 2004 </td><td> 2003 </td><td colspan="2"> 2002 </td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="4"> (Dollars in millions)</td></tr><tr><td>Net sales</td><td>$4,323</td><td>$3,650</td><td>$3,184</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>% change compared with prior year</td><td>18%</td><td>15%</td><td>(8</td><td>)%</td></tr><tr><td>Segment profit</td><td>$575</td><td>$461</td><td>$393</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>% change compared with prior year</td><td>25%</td><td>17%</td><td>28%</td><td></td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td></td><td colspan="3">Years Ended December 31,</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="3">(In millions)</td></tr><tr><td>Total gains (losses) on fixed maturity securities:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Total OTTI losses recognized</td><td>$-924</td><td>$-682</td><td>$-2,432</td></tr><tr><td>Less: Noncredit portion of OTTI losses transferred to and recognized in other comprehensive income (loss)</td><td>-31</td><td>212</td><td>939</td></tr><tr><td>Net OTTI losses on fixed maturity securities recognized in earnings -1</td><td>-955</td><td>-470</td><td>-1,493</td></tr><tr><td>Fixed maturity securities — net gains (losses) on sales and disposals</td><td>25</td><td>215</td><td>-165</td></tr><tr><td>Total gains (losses) on fixed maturity securities</td><td>-930</td><td>-255</td><td>-1,658</td></tr><tr><td>Other net investment gains (losses):</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Equity securities</td><td>-23</td><td>104</td><td>-399</td></tr><tr><td>Trading and other securities — FVO general account securities —changes in estimated fair value</td><td>-2</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Mortgage loans</td><td>175</td><td>22</td><td>-442</td></tr><tr><td>Real estate and real estate joint ventures</td><td>134</td><td>-54</td><td>-164</td></tr><tr><td>Other limited partnership interests</td><td>4</td><td>-18</td><td>-356</td></tr><tr><td>Other investment portfolio gains (losses)</td><td>-7</td><td>-6</td><td>-26</td></tr><tr><td>Subtotal — investment portfolio gains (losses)</td><td>-649</td><td>-207</td><td>-3,045</td></tr><tr><td>FVO CSEs — changes in estimated fair value:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Commercial mortgage loans</td><td>-84</td><td>758</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Securities</td><td>—</td><td>-78</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Long-term debt — related to commercial mortgage loans</td><td>97</td><td>-722</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Long-term debt — related to securities</td><td>-8</td><td>48</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Other gains (losses) (2)</td><td>-223</td><td>-207</td><td>144</td></tr><tr><td>Subtotal FVO CSEs and other gains (losses)</td><td>-218</td><td>-201</td><td>144</td></tr><tr><td>Total net investment gains (losses)</td><td>$-867</td><td>$-408</td><td>$-2,901</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td></td><td colspan="3">Years Ended December 31,</td><td colspan="3">Years Ended December 31,</td><td colspan="3">Years Ended December 31,</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="3">Fixed Maturity Securities</td><td colspan="3">Equity Securities</td><td colspan="3">Total</td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="9">(In millions)</td></tr><tr><td>Proceeds</td><td>$67,449</td><td>$54,514</td><td>$38,972</td><td>$1,241</td><td>$616</td><td>$940</td><td>$68,690</td><td>$55,130</td><td>$39,912</td></tr><tr><td>Gross investment gains</td><td>$892</td><td>$831</td><td>$939</td><td>$108</td><td>$129</td><td>$134</td><td>$1,000</td><td>$960</td><td>$1,073</td></tr><tr><td>Gross investment losses</td><td>-867</td><td>-616</td><td>-1,104</td><td>-71</td><td>-11</td><td>-133</td><td>-938</td><td>-627</td><td>-1,237</td></tr><tr><td>Total OTTI losses recognized in earnings:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Credit-related</td><td>-645</td><td>-423</td><td>-1,130</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>-645</td><td>-423</td><td>-1,130</td></tr><tr><td>Other -1</td><td>-310</td><td>-47</td><td>-363</td><td>-60</td><td>-14</td><td>-400</td><td>-370</td><td>-61</td><td>-763</td></tr><tr><td>Total OTTI losses recognized in earnings</td><td>-955</td><td>-470</td><td>-1,493</td><td>-60</td><td>-14</td><td>-400</td><td>-1,015</td><td>-484</td><td>-1,893</td></tr><tr><td>Net investment gains (losses)</td><td>$-930</td><td>$-255</td><td>$-1,658</td><td>$-23</td><td>$104</td><td>$-399</td><td>$-953</td><td>$-151</td><td>$-2,057</td></tr></table>

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total return for apple inc . for the five year period ended september 2018?
Answer: 2.59
Reasoning program: subtract(359,100), divide(#0,100)