LEIDOS HOLDINGS, INC.  LEIDOS, INC.
COMBINED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The Company’s unrecognized tax benefits are primarily related to certain recurring deductions customary for the Company’s industry.
The changes in the unrecognized tax benefits, excluding accrued interest and penalties, were as follows:
## Table 0 ##
In fiscal 2014, the Company’s unrecognized tax benefits decreased primarily due to the expiration of the fiscal 2009 statute of limitations.
In fiscal 2013, the Company’s unrecognized tax benefits decreased primarily due to the issue resolution agreement with the IRS with respect to the CityTime loss provision recorded in fiscal 2012.
At each of January 31, 2014 and 2013, accrued interest and penalties totaled $2 million and $3 million, respectively.
A negligible amount of interest and penalties were recognized in the consolidated statements of income in fiscal 2014, 2013, and 2012.
At January 31, 2014, the balance of unrecognized tax benefits included liabilities for uncertain tax positions of $16 million, $12 million of which were classified as other long-term liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet.
The balance of unrecognized tax benefits at January 31, 2013 included liabilities for uncertain tax positions of $24 million, all of which is classified as other long-term liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet.
The Company files income tax returns in the United States and various state and foreign jurisdictions and is subject to routine compliance reviews by the IRS and other taxing authorities.
The Company has effectively settled with the IRS for all fiscal years prior to 2014, except 2010.
During the next 12 months, it is reasonably possible that resolution of reviews by taxing authorities, both domestic and international, could be reached with respect to $8 million of the Company’s unrecognized tax benefits, including $1 million of previously accrued interest, depending on the timing of ongoing examinations, any litigation and expiration of statute of limitations, either because the Company’s tax positions are sustained or because the Company agrees to their disallowance and pays the related income tax.
The resolution of the tax matters could result in a $4 million reduction in income tax expense during the last two quarters of fiscal 2015.
While the Company believes it has adequate accruals for uncertain tax positions, the tax authorities may determine that the Company owes taxes in excess of recorded accruals or the recorded accruals may be in excess of the final settlement amounts agreed to by tax authorities.
Note 13—Retirement Plans: Defined Contribution Plans The Company sponsors several defined contribution plans, including the Leidos, Inc.  Retirement Plan which is both a 401(k) plan and an employee stock ownership plan, in which most employees are eligible to participate.
These plans allow eligible participants to contribute a portion of their income through payroll deductions and the Company may also make discretionary contributions.
Company contributions expensed for defined contribution plans were $81 million, $92 million and $95 million in fiscal 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively.
At the end of fiscal 2014, the Company elected to decrease its discretionary employer match contribution percentage and also provided for an additional Company contribution to be given to all eligible employees, regardless of whether the employee participates in the 401(k) plan, payable at the end of the calendar year to all employees employed on the last day of the calendar year, with certain exceptions.
Deferred Compensation Plans The Company maintains two deferred compensation plans, the Keystaff Deferral Plan (KDP) and the Key Executive Stock Deferral Plan (KESDP), for the benefit of certain management or highly compensated employees or directors and allows eligible participants to elect to defer all or a portion of their annual bonus, sign-on bonus or certain other bonuses.
Directors
PART II acquisition.
The internal revenue contraction reflects a decline in our commercial and federal health business driven by lower hospital IT spending trends ($112 million), lower volume in engineering services for the U. S.  Government and commercial customers ($91 million) and the completion of energy design-build construction projects ($24 million).
Health and Engineering revenues increased $213 million, or 13%, for fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012.
This increase was primarily driven by revenues from acquired businesses, including the August 2012 acquisition of maxIT and the August 2011 acquisition of Vitalize.
Internal revenues grew 2%, reflecting increases in healthcare IT consulting services with commercial clients ($87 million), increased activity related to energy design-build construction projects ($27 million) and increased unit deliveries and related maintenance of our non-intrusive inspection engineering products ($13 million).
These increases were partially offset by lower volume in engineering services for U. S.  Government customers ($48 million) and program completions with federal health information technology customers, particularly with the DoD military health system ($47 million).
Health and Engineering operating income decreased $119 million, or 85%, for fiscal 2014 compared to fiscal 2013.
The decrease was primarily attributable to bad debt expense for certain receivables related to two energy design-build construction projects ($41 million), an impairment of intangible assets acquired from the fiscal 2011 acquisition of Reveal Imaging Technologies ($30 million), and an impairment of intangible assets acquired in connection with the fiscal year 2012 and 2013 acquisitions of Vitalize and maxIT ($19 million).
There was also an increase in net unfavorable change in contract estimates ($4 million) primarily related to increased expenses associated with a completion estimate for an energy design-build construction fixed price project and lower revenue volume.
Health and Engineering operating income remained relatively constant for fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012.
Operating income was favorably impacted primarily due to higher revenue volume, a reduction in research and development expense ($19 million) resulting from the advancement through the product development life cycle of new non-intrusive inspection system offerings, as well as the loss provision related to a data privacy litigation matter ($9 million) in the prior year period, which is discussed in Note 17 of the combined notes to the consolidated financial statements.
These increases were partially offset by a net unfavorable change in contract estimates ($11 million) primarily related to certain energy and construction projects compared to a net positive change in contract estimates ($3 million) in the prior year period, increased intangible asset amortization expense ($8 million), increased severance expense ($4 million), and costs related to exit a facility associated with a past acquisition ($3 million).
The following table summarizes changes in National Security Solutions revenues and operating income for the last three fiscal years:
## Table 1 ##
National Security Solutions revenues decreased $601 million, or 13%, for fiscal 2014 as compared to fiscal 2013.
Revenue contraction was attributable to the drawdown of overseas U. S.  military forces ($331 million) including the ramp down of the Joint Logistics Integration (JLI) program for tactical and mine resistant ambush protected vehicles ($238 million of the $331 million), and the completion of several intelligence contracts ($158 million).
The remainder of the decline was primarily driven by overall reductions in defense and U. S.  Government spending resulting from sequestration and budget cuts.
National Security Solutions revenues increased $32 million, or 1%, for fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012.
Revenue growth was primarily attributable to increased activity on a number of programs, including two airborne surveillance programs ($108 million), a geospatial intelligence program ($41 million), a new intelligence analysis solution program ($25 million) and a new intelligence systems integration program for the U. S.  Army ($22 million).
These increases were partially offset by reduced activity on a number of programs, including a processing, exploitation and dissemination program for the U. S.  Army ($60 million), the JLI program for tactical and mine resistant ambush protected vehicles ($28 million) and an intelligence analysis contract that concluded in the current year ($26 million).
In addition, there was a decline in sale of proprietary products ($34 million).
credit facility require that, for a period of four trailing fiscal quarters, we maintain a ratio of consolidated funded debt, including borrowings under this facility, to EBITDA adjusted for other items as defined in the credit facility of not more than 3.25 to 1.0 and a ratio of EBITDA adjusted for other items as defined in the credit facility to interest expense of greater than 3.5 to 1.0.
As of January 31, 2014, we were in compliance with all covenants under the credit facility.
A failure to meet the financial covenants in the future could reduce our borrowing capacity under the credit facility.
For additional information on our credit facility, see Note 6 of the combined notes to consolidated financial statements contained within this Annual Report on Form 10-K.  Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements We have outstanding performance guarantees and cross-indemnity agreements in connection with certain of our unconsolidated joint venture investments.
We also have letters of credit outstanding principally related to guarantees on contracts with foreign government customers and surety bonds outstanding principally related to performance and payment bonds as described in Note 18 of the combined notes to consolidated financial statements contained within this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
These arrangements have not had, and management does not believe it is likely that they will in the future have, a material effect on our liquidity, capital resources, operations or financial condition.
Contractual Obligations The following table summarizes, as of January 31, 2014, our obligations to make future payments pursuant to certain contracts or arrangements and provides an estimate of the fiscal years in which these obligations are expected to be satisfied:
## Table 2 ##
(1) Includes total interest payments on our outstanding debt of $73 million in each fiscal year 2015, 2017, and 2019, $74 million in fiscal year 2016 and 2018 and $914 million in fiscal 2020 and thereafter.
(2) Excludes $12 million related to an operating lease on a contract with the Greek government as we are not obligated to make the lease payments to the lessee if our customer defaults on payments to us.
(3) Other long-term liabilities were allocated by fiscal year as follows: a liability for our foreign defined benefit pension plan is based upon the expected near-term contributions to the plan (for a discussion of potential changes in these pension obligations, see Note 13 of the combined notes to consolidated financial statements contained within this Annual Report on Form 10-K); liabilities under deferred compensation arrangements are based upon the average annual payments in prior years upon termination of employment by participants; and other liabilities are based on the fiscal year that the liabilities are expected to be realized.
The table above does not include income tax liabilities for uncertain tax positions of $12 million as we are not able to reasonably estimate the timing of payments in individual years due to uncertainties in the timing of audit outcomes.
Commitments and Contingencies We are subject to a number of reviews, investigations, claims, lawsuits and other uncertainties related to our business.
For a discussion of these items, see Notes 17 and 18 of the combined notes to the consolidated financial statements contained within this Annual Report on Form 10-K.  Critical Accounting Policies Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP).
The preparation of these financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingencies at the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.
Management evaluates these estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis.
Our estimates and assumptions have been prepared by management on the basis of the most current reasonably available information.
The results of these estimates form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.
Actual results could differ from these estimates under different assumptions and conditions.
?
The failure of our information systems to function as intended or their penetration by outside parties with the intent to corrupt them or our failure to comply with privacy laws and regulations could result in business disruption, litigation and regulatory action, and loss of revenue, assets or personal or other confidential data.
We use information systems to help manage business processes, collect and interpret business data and communicate internally and externally with employees, suppliers, customers and others.
Some of these information systems are managed by third-party service providers.
We have backup systems and business continuity plans in place, and we take care to protect our systems and data from unauthorized access.
Nevertheless, failure of our systems to function as intended, or penetration of our systems by outside parties intent on extracting or corrupting information or otherwise disrupting business processes, could place us at a competitive disadvantage, result in a loss of revenue, assets or personal or other sensitive data, litigation and regulatory action, cause damage to our reputation and that of our brands and result in significant remediation and other costs.
Failure to protect personal data and respect the rights of data subjects could subject us to substantial fines under regulations such as the EU General Data Protection Regulation. ?
We may be required to replace third-party contract manufacturers or service providers with our own resources.
In certain instances, we contract with third parties to manufacture some of our products or product parts or to provide other services.
We may be unable to renew these agreements on satisfactory terms for numerous reasons, including government regulations.
Accordingly, our costs may increase significantly if we must replace such third parties with our own resources.
Item 1B.
Unresolved Staff Comments.
None.
Item 2.
Properties.
At December 31, 2017, we operated and owned 46 manufacturing facilities and maintained contract manufacturing relationships with 25 third-party manufacturers across 23 markets.
In addition, we work with 38 third-party operators in Indonesia who manufacture our hand-rolled cigarettes.
PMI-Owned Manufacturing Facilities

Tables referenced above, in order (Table 0 first):
<table><tr><td></td><td colspan="3">Year Ended January 31</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="3">(in millions)</td></tr><tr><td>Unrecognized tax benefits at beginning of year</td><td>$21</td><td>$129</td><td>$23</td></tr><tr><td>Additions for tax positions related to current year</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>102</td></tr><tr><td>Additions for tax positions related to prior years</td><td>2</td><td>2</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>Reductions for tax positions related to prior years</td><td>—</td><td>-107</td><td>-4</td></tr><tr><td>Settlements with taxing authorities</td><td>—</td><td>-1</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Lapse of statute of limitations</td><td>-9</td><td>-2</td><td>-2</td></tr><tr><td>Unrecognized tax benefits at end of year</td><td>$14</td><td>$21</td><td>$129</td></tr><tr><td>Unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective income tax rate</td><td>$6</td><td>$10</td><td>$108</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td></td><td colspan="5">Year Ended January 31</td></tr><tr><td>National Security Solutions</td><td>2014</td><td>Percentchange</td><td>2013</td><td>Percentchange</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="5">(dollars in millions)</td></tr><tr><td>Revenues</td><td>$4,049</td><td>-13%</td><td>$4,650</td><td>1%</td><td>$4,618</td></tr><tr><td>Operating income</td><td>292</td><td>-19%</td><td>360</td><td>-10%</td><td>400</td></tr><tr><td>Operating income margin</td><td>7.2%</td><td></td><td>7.7%</td><td></td><td>8.7%</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td></td><td colspan="7">Payments Due by Fiscal Year</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Total</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td><td>2017</td><td>2018</td><td>2019</td><td>2020 & Thereafter</td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="7">(in millions)</td></tr><tr><td>Contractual obligations:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Long-term debt (including current portion)<sup>(1)</sup></td><td>$2,618</td><td>$75</td><td>$75</td><td>$75</td><td>$76</td><td>$75</td><td>$2,242</td></tr><tr><td>Operating lease obligations<sup>-2</sup></td><td>488</td><td>95</td><td>91</td><td>76</td><td>64</td><td>53</td><td>109</td></tr><tr><td>Capital lease obligations</td><td>3</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Other long-term liabilities<sup>-3</sup></td><td>50</td><td>14</td><td>11</td><td>6</td><td>6</td><td>6</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>Total contractual obligations</td><td>$3,159</td><td>$185</td><td>$178</td><td>$158</td><td>$146</td><td>$134</td><td>$2,358</td></tr></table>

Question: What is the sum of Operating lease obligations in 2017 and Unrecognized tax benefits at end of year in 2012? (in million)
Answer: 205
Reasoning program: add(76,129)