result of Brexit.
Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates have resulted and may continue to result in corresponding fluctuations in our AUM, revenue and earnings.
During the year ended December 31, 2016, approximately 47% of our business was transacted in non-U.
S.  dollar currencies, the majority of which included the Australian dollar, Brazilian real, British pound sterling, Canadian dollar, Chinese yuan, Danish krone, euro, Hong Kong dollar, Indian rupee, Japanese yen, Mexican peso, Polish zloty, Singapore dollar, Swedish krona, Swiss franc and Thai baht.
The following table sets forth our revenue derived from our most significant currencies (U. S.  dollars in thousands):
## Table 0 ##
Although we operate globally, we report our results in U. S.  dollars.
As a result, the strengthening or weakening of the U. S.  dollar may positively or negatively impact our reported results.
For example, we estimate that had the British pound sterling-to-U.
S.  dollar exchange rates been 10% higher during the year ended December 31, 2016, the net impact would have been an increase in pre-tax income of $4.9 million.
Had the euro-to-U.
S.  dollar exchange rates been 10% higher during the year ended December 31, 2016, the net impact would have been an increase in pre-tax income of $3.7 million.
These hypothetical calculations estimate the impact of translating results into U. S.  dollars and do not include an estimate of the impact that a 10% change in the U. S.  dollar against other currencies would have had on our foreign operations.
We enter into derivative financial instruments to attempt to protect the value or fix the amount of certain obligations in terms of our reporting currency, the U. S.  dollar.
In March 2014, we began a foreign currency exchange forward hedging program (which expired in December 2016) by entering into foreign currency exchange forward contracts, including agreements to buy U. S.  dollars and sell Australian dollars, British pound sterling, Canadian dollars, euros and Japanese yen.
The purpose of these forward contracts was to attempt to mitigate the risk of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates that would adversely impact some of our foreign currency denominated EBITDA.
Hedge accounting was not elected for any of these contracts.
As such, changes in the fair values of these contracts were recorded directly in earnings.
Included in the consolidated statement of operations set forth in Item 8 of this Annual Report were net gains of $7.7 million , $24.2 million and $5.3 million from foreign currency exchange forward contracts for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
As of December 31, 2016, we had no foreign currency exchange forward contracts outstanding as the program has been terminated.
We do not intend to hedge our foreign currency denominated EBITDA in 2017.
Global Investment Management Revenue decreased by $90.9 million, or 19.7%, for the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2015.
This decrease was primarily driven by lower carried interest revenue as well as lower acquisition, asset management and incentive fees in the current year.
Foreign currency translation had an $11.8 million negative impact on total revenue during the year ended December 31, 2016 versus the same period in 2015, primarily driven by weakness in the British pound sterling.
Operating, administrative and other expenses decreased by $50.8 million, or 14.6%, for the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to the same period in 2015, primarily driven by lower carried interest expense incurred in the current year.
Additionally, foreign currency had a net $5.0 million positive impact on total operating expenses during the year ended December 31, 2016, which included $2.7 million of unfavorable foreign currency transaction activity over the same period last year, much of which related to hedging activities, that was more than offset by a $7.7 million positive impact from foreign currency translation.
These decreases were partially offset by $19.8 million of additional costs in 2016 versus 2015 in connection with our costelimination project.
A roll forward of our AUM by product type for the year ended December 31, 2016 is as follows (dollars in billions):
## Table 1 ##
AUM generally refers to the properties and other assets with respect to which we provide (or participate in) oversight, investment management services and other advice, and which generally consist of real estate properties or loans, securities portfolios and investments in operating companies and joint ventures.
Our AUM is intended principally to reflect the extent of our presence in the real estate market, not the basis for determining our management fees.
Our assets under management consist of: ?
the total fair market value of the real estate properties and other assets either wholly-owned or held by joint ventures and other entities in which our sponsored funds or investment vehicles and client accounts have invested or to which they have provided financing.
Committed (but unfunded) capital from investors in our sponsored funds is not included in this component of our AUM.
The value of development properties is included at estimated completion cost.
In the case of real estate operating companies, the total value of real properties controlled by the companies, generally through joint ventures, is included in AUM; and ?
the net asset value of our managed securities portfolios, including investments (which may be comprised of committed but uncalled capital) in private real estate funds under our fund of funds program.
Our calculation of AUM may differ from the calculations of other asset managers, and as a result, this measure may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other asset managers.
Development Services Revenue increased by $5.8 million, or 8.8%, for the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2015, primarily driven by higher development fees in the current year.
Investment advisory revenues earned on the other investment portfolios that we manage decreased $3.6 million to $522.2 million.
Average assets in these portfolios were $142.1 billion during 2008, up slightly from $141.4 billion in 2007.
These minor changes, each less than 1%, are attributable to the timing of declining equity market valuations and cash flows among our separate account and sub-advised portfolios.
Net inflows, primarily from institutional investors, were $13.2 billion during 2008, including the $1.3 billion transferred from the Retirement Funds to target-date trusts.
Decreases in market valuations, net of income, lowered our assets under management in these portfolios by $55.3 billion during 2008.
Administrative fees increased $5.8 million to $353.9 million, primarily from increased costs of servicing activities for the mutual funds and their investors.
Changes in administrative fees are generally offset by similar changes in related operating expenses that are incurred to provide services to the funds and their investors.
Our largest expense, compensation and related costs, increased $18.4 million or 2.3% from 2007.
This increase includes $37.2 million in salaries resulting from an 8.4% increase in our average staff count and an increase of our associates’ base salaries at the beginning of the year.
At December 31, 2008, we employed 5,385 associates, up 6.0% from the end of 2007, primarily to add capabilities and support increased volume-related activities and other growth over the past few years.
Over the course of 2008, we slowed the growth of our associate base from earlier plans and the prior year.
We do not expect the number of our associates to increase in 2009.
We also reduced our annual bonuses $27.6 million versus the 2007 year in response to recent and ongoing unfavorable financial market conditions that negatively impacted our operating results.
The balance of the increase is attributable to higher employee benefits and employmentrelated expenses, including an increase of $5.7 million in stock-based compensation.
Entering 2009, we did not increase the salaries of our highest paid associates.
After higher spending during the first quarter of 2008 versus 2007, investor sentiment in the uncertain and volatile market environment caused us to reduce advertising and promotion spending, which for the year was down $3.8 million from 2007.
We expect to reduce these expenditures for 2009 versus 2008, and estimate that spending in the first quarter of 2009 will be down about $5 million from the fourth quarter of 2008.
We vary our level of spending based on market conditions and investor demand as well as our efforts to expand our investor base in the United States and abroad.
Occupancy and facility costs together with depreciation expense increased $18 million, or 12% compared to 2007.
We have been expanding and renovating our facilities to accommodate the growth in our associates to meet business demands.
Other operating expenses were up $3.3 million from 2007.
We increased our spending $9.8 million, primarily for professional fees and information and other third-party services.
Reductions in travel and charitable contributions partially offset these increases.
Our non-operating investment activity resulted in a net loss of $52.3 million in 2008 as compared to a net gain of $80.4 million in 2007.
This change of $132.7 million is primarily attributable to losses recognized in 2008 on our investments in sponsored mutual funds, which resulted from declines in financial market values during the year.
## Table 2 ##
We recognized other than temporary impairments of our investments in sponsored mutual funds because of declines in fair value below cost for an extended period.
The significant declines in fair value below cost that occurred in 2008 were generally attributable to the adverse and ongoing market conditions discussed in the Background section on page 18 of this report.
See also the discussion on page 24 of Critical Accounting Policies for other than temporary impairments of available-for-sale securities.
In addition, income from money market and bond fund holdings was $19.3 million lower than in 2007 due to the significantly lower interest rate environment of 2008.
Lower interest rates also led to substantial capital appreciation on our $40 million holding of U. S.  Treasury Notes that we sold in December 2008 at a $2.6 million gain.

Tables referenced above, in order (Table 0 first):
<table><tr><td></td><td colspan="6"> Year Ended December 31,</td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="2">2016</td><td colspan="2">2015</td><td colspan="2"> 2014</td></tr><tr><td>United States dollar</td><td>$6,917,221</td><td>52.9%</td><td>$5,991,826</td><td>55.2%</td><td>$5,027,479</td><td>55.6%</td></tr><tr><td>British pound sterling</td><td>2,008,776</td><td>15.4%</td><td>1,861,199</td><td>17.1%</td><td>1,632,127</td><td>18.0%</td></tr><tr><td>euro</td><td>1,541,461</td><td>11.8%</td><td>1,071,666</td><td>9.9%</td><td>773,753</td><td>8.5%</td></tr><tr><td>Australian dollar</td><td>367,578</td><td>2.8%</td><td>360,284</td><td>3.3%</td><td>359,660</td><td>4.0%</td></tr><tr><td>Canadian dollar</td><td>310,062</td><td>2.4%</td><td>291,273</td><td>2.7%</td><td>319,670</td><td>3.5%</td></tr><tr><td>Indian rupee</td><td>244,087</td><td>1.9%</td><td>171,678</td><td>1.6%</td><td>135,139</td><td>1.5%</td></tr><tr><td>Japanese yen</td><td>212,854</td><td>1.6%</td><td>155,842</td><td>1.4%</td><td>168,574</td><td>1.9%</td></tr><tr><td>Chinese yuan</td><td>207,773</td><td>1.6%</td><td>152,771</td><td>1.4%</td><td>101,790</td><td>1.1%</td></tr><tr><td>Singapore dollar</td><td>173,967</td><td>1.3%</td><td>105,336</td><td>1.0%</td><td>89,343</td><td>1.0%</td></tr><tr><td>Swiss franc</td><td>145,000</td><td>1.2%</td><td>70,415</td><td>0.7%</td><td>22,494</td><td>0.2%</td></tr><tr><td>Hong Kong dollar</td><td>106,869</td><td>0.8%</td><td>85,052</td><td>0.8%</td><td>60,186</td><td>0.7%</td></tr><tr><td>Mexican peso</td><td>84,688</td><td>0.6%</td><td>68,429</td><td>0.6%</td><td>39,371</td><td>0.4%</td></tr><tr><td>Brazilian real</td><td>83,738</td><td>0.6%</td><td>65,844</td><td>0.6%</td><td>77,305</td><td>0.9%</td></tr><tr><td>Polish zloty</td><td>69,949</td><td>0.5%</td><td>49,998</td><td>0.5%</td><td>28,936</td><td>0.3%</td></tr><tr><td>Danish krone</td><td>68,639</td><td>0.5%</td><td>25,673</td><td>0.2%</td><td>11,076</td><td>0.1%</td></tr><tr><td>Swedish krona</td><td>59,603</td><td>0.5%</td><td>32,414</td><td>0.3%</td><td>21,692</td><td>0.2%</td></tr><tr><td>Thai baht</td><td>46,844</td><td>0.4%</td><td>35,456</td><td>0.3%</td><td>13,442</td><td>0.1%</td></tr><tr><td>Other currencies</td><td>422,480</td><td>3.2%</td><td>260,654</td><td>2.4%</td><td>167,881</td><td>2.0%</td></tr><tr><td>Total revenue</td><td>$13,071,589</td><td>100.0%</td><td>$10,855,810</td><td>100.0%</td><td>$9,049,918</td><td>100.0%</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td></td><td>Funds</td><td>Separate Accounts</td><td>Securities</td><td>Total</td></tr><tr><td>Balance at January 1, 2016</td><td>$28.3</td><td>$39.9</td><td>$20.8</td><td>$89.0</td></tr><tr><td>Inflows</td><td>5.4</td><td>5.7</td><td>2.7</td><td>13.8</td></tr><tr><td>Outflows</td><td>-4.7</td><td>-6.1</td><td>-6.3</td><td>-17.1</td></tr><tr><td>Market appreciation (depreciation)</td><td>2.6</td><td>-2.0</td><td>0.3</td><td>0.9</td></tr><tr><td>Balance at December 31, 2016</td><td>$31.6</td><td>$37.5</td><td>$17.5</td><td>$86.6</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td></td><td>2007</td><td>2008</td><td>Change</td></tr><tr><td>Capital gain distributions received</td><td>$22.1</td><td>$5.6</td><td>$-16.5</td></tr><tr><td>Other than temporary impairments recognized</td><td>-.3</td><td>-91.3</td><td>-91.0</td></tr><tr><td>Net gains (losses) realized on funddispositions</td><td>5.5</td><td>-4.5</td><td>-10.0</td></tr><tr><td>Net gain (loss) recognized on fund holdings</td><td>$27.3</td><td>$-90.2</td><td>$-117.5</td></tr></table>

Question: What is the sum of Australian dollar, Canadian dollar and Indian rupee in 2016？ ?
Answer: 921727
Reasoning program: add(367578,310062), add(#0,244087)