MFC’s operating profit for 2013 increased $175 million, or 14%, compared to 2012.
The increase was primarily attributable to higher operating profit of approximately $85 million for air and missile defense programs (THAAD and PAC-3) due to increased risk retirements and volume; about $85 million for fire control programs (Sniper?, LANTIRN?
and Apache) due to increased risk retirements and higher volume; and approximately $75 million for tactical missile programs (Hellfire and various programs) due to increased risk retirements.
The increases were partially offset by lower operating profit of about $45 million for the resolution of contractual matters in the second quarter of 2012; and approximately $15 million for various technical services programs due to lower volume partially offset by increased risk retirements.
Adjustments not related to volume, including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters, were approximately $100 million higher for 2013 compared to 2012.2012 compared to 2011 MFC’s net sales for 2012 were comparable to 2011.
Net sales decreased approximately $130 million due to lower volume and risk retirements on various services programs, and about $60 million due to lower volume from fire control systems programs (primarily Sniper?
; LANTIRN?
; and Apache).
The decreases largely were offset by higher net sales of approximately $95 million due to higher volume from tactical missile programs (primarily Javelin and Hellfire) and approximately $80 million for air and missile defense programs (primarily PAC-3 and THAAD).
MFC’s operating profit for 2012 increased $187 million, or 17%, compared to 2011.
The increase was attributable to higher risk retirements and volume of about $95 million from tactical missile programs (primarily Javelin and Hellfire); increased risk retirements and volume of approximately $60 million for air and missile defense programs (primarily THAAD and PAC-3); and about $45 million from a resolution of contractual matters.
Partially offsetting these increases was lower risk retirements and volume on various programs, including $25 million for services programs.
Adjustments not related to volume, including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters described above, were approximately $145 million higher for 2012 compared to 2011.
Backlog Backlog increased in 2013 compared to 2012 mainly due to higher orders on the THAAD program and lower sales volume compared to new orders on certain fire control systems programs in 2013, partially offset by lower orders on technical services programs and certain tactical missile programs.
Backlog increased in 2012 compared to 2011 mainly due to increased orders and lower sales on fire control systems programs (primarily LANTIRN?
and Sniper?)
and on various services programs, partially offset by lower orders and higher sales volume on tactical missiles programs.
Trends We expect MFC’s net sales to be flat to slightly down in 2014 compared to 2013, primarily due to a decrease in net sales on technical services programs partially offset by an increase in net sales from missiles and fire control programs.
Operating profit is expected to decrease in the high single digit percentage range, driven by a reduction in expected risk retirements in 2014.
Accordingly, operating profit margin is expected to slightly decline from 2013.
Mission Systems and Training Our MST business segment provides ship and submarine mission and combat systems; mission systems and sensors for rotary and fixed-wing aircraft; sea and land-based missile defense systems; radar systems; littoral combat ships; simulation and training services; and unmanned systems and technologies.
MST’s major programs include Aegis Combat System (Aegis), LCS, MH-60, TPQ-53 Radar System, and MK-41 Vertical Launching System (VLS).
MST’s operating results included the following (in millions):
## Table 0 ##
2013 compared to 2012 MST’s net sales for 2013 decreased $426 million, or 6%, compared to 2012.
The decrease was primarily attributable to lower net sales of approximately $275 million for various ship and aviation systems programs due to lower volume
Principal Financial Group, Inc.  Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (continued) 5.
Derivative Financial Instruments — (continued) Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments Our use of futures, certain swaptions and swaps, collars, options and forwards are effective from an economic standpoint, but they have not been designated as hedges for financial reporting purposes.
As such, periodic changes in the market value of these instruments, which includes mark-to-market gains and losses as well as periodic and final settlements, primarily flow directly into net realized capital gains (losses) on the consolidated statements of operations.
Gains and losses on certain derivatives used in relation to certain trading portfolios are reported in net investment income on the consolidated statements of operations.
The following tables show the effect of derivatives not designated as hedging instruments, including market value changes of embedded derivatives that have been bifurcated from the host contract, on the consolidated statements of operations.
## Table 1 ##
(1) Primarily includes the change in fair value of embedded derivatives.6.
Closed Block In connection with the 1998 MIHC formation, Principal Life formed a Closed Block to provide reasonable assurance to policyholders included therein that, after the formation of the MIHC, assets would be available to maintain dividends in aggregate in accordance with the 1997 policy dividend scales, if the experience underlying such scales continued.
Assets of Principal Life were allocated to the Closed Block in an amount that produces cash flows which, together with anticipated revenue from policies and contracts included in the Closed Block, were expected to be sufficient to support the Closed Block policies, including, but not limited to, provisions for payment of claims, certain expenses, charges and taxes, and to provide for continuation of policy and contract dividends in aggregate in accordance with the 1997 dividend scales, if the experience underlying such scales continues, and to allow for appropriate adjustments in such scales, if such experience changes.
Due to adjustable life policies being included in the Closed Block, the Closed Block is charged with amounts necessary to properly fund for certain adjustments, such as face amount and premium increases, that are made to these policies after the Closed Block inception date.
These amounts are referred to as Funding Adjustment Charges and are treated as capital transfers from the Closed Block.
Assets allocated to the Closed Block inure solely to the benefit of the holders of policies included in the Closed Block.
Closed Block assets and liabilities are carried on the same basis as other similar assets and liabilities.
Principal Life will continue to pay guaranteed benefits under all policies, including the policies within the Closed Block, in accordance with their terms.
If the assets allocated to the Closed Block, the investment cash flows from those assets and the revenues from the policies included in the Closed Block, including investment income thereon, prove to be insufficient to pay the benefits guaranteed under the policies included in the Closed Block, Principal Life will be required to make such payments from their general funds.
No additional policies were added to the Closed Block, nor was the Closed Block affected in any other way, as a result of the demutualization.
A policyholder dividend obligation (‘‘PDO’’) is required to be established for earnings in the Closed Block that are not available to stockholders.
A model of the Closed Block was established to produce the pattern of expected earnings in the Closed Block, adjusted to eliminate the impact of related amounts in AOCI.
If actual cumulative earnings of the Closed Block are greater than the expected cumulative earnings of the Closed Block, only the expected cumulative earnings will be recognized in income with the excess recorded as a PDO.
This PDO represents undistributed accumulated earnings that will be paid to Closed Block policyholders as additional policyholder dividends unless offset by future performance of the Closed Block that is less favorable than originally expected.
If actual cumulative performance is less favorable than expected, only actual earnings will be recognized in income.
At December 31, 2010 and 2009, cumulative actual earnings have been less than cumulative expected earnings.
Additionally,
## Table 2 ##
The following tables present the carrying amount and the gross unrealized losses, including other-than-temporary impairment losses reported in OCI, on below investment grade fixed maturities available-for-sale by aging category as of the periods indicated.
## Table 3 ##
December 31, 2009
## Table 4 ##
The following tables present the carrying amount and the gross unrealized losses, including other-than-temporary impairment losses reported in OCI, on fixed maturities available-for-sale where the estimated fair value had declined and remained below amortized cost by 20% or more as of the periods indicated.
## Table 5 ##
Principal Financial Group, Inc.  Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — (continued) 1.
Nature of Operations and Significant Accounting Policies — (continued) respectively.
The financial statement exposure is limited to the reinsurance recoverable related to this single third party reinsurer, which was $27.5 million and $26.8 million at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
The effects of reinsurance on premiums and other considerations and policy and contract benefits were as follows:

Tables referenced above, in order (Table 0 first):
<table><tr><td></td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td>Net sales</td><td>$7,153</td><td>$7,579</td><td>$7,132</td></tr><tr><td>Operating profit</td><td>905</td><td>737</td><td>645</td></tr><tr><td>Operating margins</td><td>12.7%</td><td>9.7%</td><td>9.0%</td></tr><tr><td>Backlog at year-end</td><td>10,800</td><td>10,700</td><td>10,500</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td> </td><td colspan="3">Amount of gain (loss) recognized in net income on derivatives for the year ended December 31,</td></tr><tr><td> Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td> </td><td colspan="3">(in millions)</td></tr><tr><td>Interest rate contracts</td><td>$24.8</td><td>$-58.7</td><td>$90.4</td></tr><tr><td>Foreign exchange contracts</td><td>-73.5</td><td>87.9</td><td>-167.9</td></tr><tr><td>Equity contracts</td><td>-24.0</td><td>-107.7</td><td>86.3</td></tr><tr><td>Credit contracts</td><td>5.1</td><td>61.7</td><td>-102.0</td></tr><tr><td>Other contracts -1</td><td>-8.8</td><td>21.6</td><td>-43.2</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>$-76.4</td><td>$4.8</td><td>$-136.4</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td> </td><td colspan="6"> December 31, 2009</td></tr><tr><td> </td><td colspan="2"> Public</td><td colspan="2"> Private</td><td colspan="2"> Total</td></tr><tr><td> </td><td> Carrying amount</td><td> Gross unrealized losses</td><td> Carrying amount</td><td> Gross unrealized losses</td><td> Carrying amount</td><td> Gross unrealized losses</td></tr><tr><td> </td><td colspan="6"><i>(in millions)</i> </td></tr><tr><td>Three months or less</td><td>$2,367.4</td><td>$34.5</td><td>$927.7</td><td>$21.2</td><td>$3,295.1</td><td>$55.7</td></tr><tr><td>Greater than three to six months</td><td>139.0</td><td>9.7</td><td>39.2</td><td>1.0</td><td>178.2</td><td>10.7</td></tr><tr><td>Greater than six to nine months</td><td>24.0</td><td>0.2</td><td>22.3</td><td>5.1</td><td>46.3</td><td>5.3</td></tr><tr><td>Greater than nine to twelve months</td><td>75.6</td><td>14.9</td><td>50.4</td><td>6.9</td><td>126.0</td><td>21.8</td></tr><tr><td>Greater than twelve to twenty-four months</td><td>2,169.7</td><td>361.2</td><td>1,596.0</td><td>207.6</td><td>3,765.7</td><td>568.8</td></tr><tr><td>Greater than twenty-four to thirty-six months</td><td>1,846.6</td><td>415.0</td><td>1,650.2</td><td>346.2</td><td>3,496.8</td><td>761.2</td></tr><tr><td>Greater than thirty-six months</td><td>1,256.7</td><td>179.5</td><td>659.4</td><td>155.2</td><td>1,916.1</td><td>334.7</td></tr><tr><td>Total fixed maturities, available-for-sale</td><td>$7,879.0</td><td>$1,015.0</td><td>$4,945.2</td><td>$743.2</td><td>$12,824.2</td><td>$1,758.2</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td> </td><td colspan="6"> December 31, 2010</td></tr><tr><td> </td><td colspan="2"> Public</td><td colspan="2"> Private</td><td colspan="2"> Total</td></tr><tr><td> </td><td> Carrying amount</td><td> Gross unrealized losses</td><td> Carrying amount</td><td> Gross unrealized losses</td><td> Carrying amount</td><td> Gross unrealized losses</td></tr><tr><td> </td><td colspan="6"><i>(in millions)</i> </td></tr><tr><td>Three months or less</td><td>$70.1</td><td>$1.0</td><td>$70.9</td><td>$4.6</td><td>$141.0</td><td>$5.6</td></tr><tr><td>Greater than three to six months</td><td>15.1</td><td>0.3</td><td>8.9</td><td>0.1</td><td>24.0</td><td>0.4</td></tr><tr><td>Greater than six to nine months</td><td>7.2</td><td>1.1</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>7.2</td><td>1.1</td></tr><tr><td>Greater than nine to twelve months</td><td>32.0</td><td>1.2</td><td>11.5</td><td>0.6</td><td>43.5</td><td>1.8</td></tr><tr><td>Greater than twelve to twenty-four months</td><td>5.9</td><td>1.9</td><td>0.2</td><td>0.1</td><td>6.1</td><td>2.0</td></tr><tr><td>Greater than twenty-four to thirty-six months</td><td>233.9</td><td>43.9</td><td>175.1</td><td>89.0</td><td>409.0</td><td>132.9</td></tr><tr><td>Greater than thirty-six months</td><td>807.4</td><td>255.9</td><td>495.8</td><td>244.9</td><td>1,303.2</td><td>500.8</td></tr><tr><td>Total fixed maturities, available-for-sale</td><td>$1,171.6</td><td>$305.3</td><td>$762.4</td><td>$339.3</td><td>$1,934.0</td><td>$644.6</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td> </td><td colspan="6"> December 31, 2009</td></tr><tr><td> </td><td colspan="2"> Public</td><td colspan="2"> Private</td><td colspan="2"> Total</td></tr><tr><td> </td><td> Carrying amount</td><td> Gross unrealized losses</td><td> Carrying amount</td><td> Gross unrealized losses</td><td> Carrying amount</td><td> Gross unrealized losses</td></tr><tr><td> </td><td colspan="6"><i>(in millions)</i> </td></tr><tr><td>Three months or less</td><td>$55.7</td><td>$3.3</td><td>$52.8</td><td>$1.2</td><td>$108.5</td><td>$4.5</td></tr><tr><td>Greater than three to six months</td><td>3.4</td><td>—</td><td>14.8</td><td>—</td><td>18.2</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Greater than six to nine months</td><td>12.7</td><td>0.2</td><td>0.1</td><td>0.1</td><td>12.8</td><td>0.3</td></tr><tr><td>Greater than nine to twelve months</td><td>32.8</td><td>11.2</td><td>1.0</td><td>1.8</td><td>33.8</td><td>13.0</td></tr><tr><td>Greater than twelve to twenty-four months</td><td>441.3</td><td>112.2</td><td>365.6</td><td>186.7</td><td>806.9</td><td>298.9</td></tr><tr><td>Greater than twenty-four to thirty-six months</td><td>609.0</td><td>314.8</td><td>403.5</td><td>435.8</td><td>1,012.5</td><td>750.6</td></tr><tr><td>Greater than thirty-six months</td><td>113.8</td><td>26.8</td><td>84.6</td><td>76.6</td><td>198.4</td><td>103.4</td></tr><tr><td>Total fixed maturities, available-for-sale</td><td>$1,268.7</td><td>$468.5</td><td>$922.4</td><td>$702.2</td><td>$2,191.1</td><td>$1,170.7</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td> </td><td colspan="6"> December 31, 2010</td></tr><tr><td> </td><td colspan="2"> Problem, potential problem, and restructured</td><td colspan="2"> All other fixed maturity securities</td><td colspan="2"> Total</td></tr><tr><td> </td><td> Carrying amount</td><td> Gross unrealized losses</td><td> Carrying amount</td><td> Gross unrealized losses</td><td> Carrying amount</td><td> Gross unrealized losses</td></tr><tr><td> </td><td colspan="6"><i>(in millions)</i> </td></tr><tr><td>Three months or less</td><td>$39.6</td><td>$11.1</td><td>$57.7</td><td>$16.5</td><td>$97.3</td><td>$27.6</td></tr><tr><td>Greater than three to six months</td><td>0.9</td><td>1.1</td><td>15.1</td><td>4.9</td><td>16.0</td><td>6.0</td></tr><tr><td>Greater than six to nine months</td><td>0.1</td><td>—</td><td>113.8</td><td>33.3</td><td>113.9</td><td>33.3</td></tr><tr><td>Greater than nine to twelve months</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Greater than twelve months</td><td>251.4</td><td>403.6</td><td>792.8</td><td>529.4</td><td>1,044.2</td><td>933.0</td></tr><tr><td>Total fixed maturities, available-for-sale</td><td>$292.0</td><td>$415.8</td><td>$979.4</td><td>$584.1</td><td>$1,271.4</td><td>$999.9</td></tr></table>

Question: What's the 20% of total elements for Carrying amount of Total in 2009? (in million)
Answer: 438.22
Reasoning program: multiply(2191.1,0.2)