Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Notes to Financial Statements 164 As of December 31, 2011, there were 138,965 unvested restricted units that are expected to vest over an average period of 10 months.
The following table includes financial information for restricted unit awards for each of the years presented:
## Table 0 ##
Entergy paid $5.9 million in 2011 for awards under the Restricted Units Awards Plan.
NOTE 13.  BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy) Entergy’s reportable segments as of December 31, 2011 are Utility and Entergy Wholesale Commodities.
Utility includes the generation, transmission, distribution, and sale of electric power in portions of Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas, and natural gas utility service in portions of Louisiana.
Entergy Wholesale Commodities includes the ownership and operation of six nuclear power plants located in the northern United States and the sale of the electric power produced by those plants to wholesale customers.
Entergy Wholesale Commodities also includes the ownership of interests in non-nuclear power plants that sell the electric power produced by those plants to wholesale customers.
“All Other” includes the parent company, Entergy Corporation, and other business activity, including the earnings on the proceeds of sales of previously-owned businesses.
Entergy’s segment financial information is as follows:
## Table 1 ##
Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis 310 All debt and common and preferred membership interest issuances by Entergy Louisiana require prior regulatory approval.
Preferred membership interest and debt issuances are also subject to issuance tests set forth in its bond indentures and other agreements.
Entergy Louisiana has sufficient capacity under these tests to meet its foreseeable capital needs.
Entergy Louisiana’s receivables from or (payables to) the money pool were as follows as of December 31 for each of the following years:
## Table 2 ##
See Note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool.
Entergy Louisiana has a credit facility in the amount of $200 million scheduled to expire in August 2012.
As of December 31, 2011, $50 million was outstanding on the credit facility.
Entergy Louisiana obtained short-term borrowing authorization from the FERC under which it may borrow through October 2013, up to the aggregate amount, at any one time outstanding, of $250 million.
See Note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of Entergy Louisiana’s short-term borrowing limits.
Entergy Louisiana has also obtained an order from the FERC authorizing long-term securities issuances through July 2013.
In January 2012, Entergy Louisiana issued $250 million of 1.875% Series first mortgage bonds due December 2014.
Entergy Louisiana used the proceeds to repay short-term borrowings under the Entergy System money pool.
Little Gypsy Repowering Project In April 2007, Entergy Louisiana announced that it intended to pursue the solid fuel repowering of a 538 MW unit at its Little Gypsy plant.
In March 2009 the LPSC voted in favor of a motion directing Entergy Louisiana to temporarily suspend the repowering project and, based upon an analysis of the project’s economic viability, to make a recommendation regarding whether to proceed with the project.
This action was based upon a number of factors including the recent decline in natural gas prices, as well as environmental concerns, the unknown costs of carbon legislation and changes in the capital/financial markets.
In April 2009, Entergy Louisiana complied with the LPSC’s directive and recommended that the project be suspended for an extended period of time of three years or more.
In May 2009 the LPSC issued an order declaring that Entergy Louisiana’s decision to place the Little Gypsy project into a longer-term suspension of three years or more is in the public interest and prudent.
In October 2009, Entergy Louisiana made a filing with the LPSC seeking permission to cancel the Little Gypsy repowering project and seeking project cost recovery over a five-year period.
In June 2010 and August 2010, the LPSC Staff and Intervenors filed testimony.
The LPSC Staff (1) agreed that it was prudent to move the project from long-term suspension to cancellation and that the timing of the decision to suspend on a longer-term basis was not imprudent; (2) indicated that, except for $0.8 million in compensation-related costs, the costs incurred should be deemed prudent; (3) recommended recovery from customers over ten years but stated that the LPSC may want to consider 15 years; (4) allowed for recovery of carrying costs and earning a return on project costs, but at a reduced rate approximating the cost of debt, while also acknowledging that the LPSC may consider ordering no return; and (5) indicated that Entergy Louisiana should be directed to securitize project costs, if legally feasible and in the public interest.
In the third quarter 2010, in accordance with accounting standards, Entergy Louisiana determined that it was probable that the Little Gypsy repowering project would be abandoned and accordingly reclassified $199.8 million of project costs from construction work in progress to a regulatory asset.
A hearing on the issues, except for cost allocation among customer classes, was held before the ALJ in November 2010.
In January 2011 all parties participated in a mediation on the disputed issues, resulting in a settlement of all disputed issues, including cost recovery and cost allocation.
The settlement provides for Entergy Louisiana to recover $200 million as of March 31, 2011, and carrying costs on that amount on specified terms thereafter.
The settlement also provides for Entergy Louisiana to recover the approved project costs by securitization.
In April 2011, Entergy
ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, INC.  MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS Plan to Spin Off the Utility’s Transmission Business See the “Plan to Spin Off the Utility’s Transmission Business” section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis for a discussion of this matter, including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities.
Results of Operations Net Income 2011 Compared to 2010 Net income increased $4.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses, lower taxes other than income taxes, a lower effective income tax rate, and lower interest expense, partially offset by lower net revenue.2010 Compared to 2009 Net income remained relatively unchanged, increasing $0.6 million, primarily due to higher net revenue and lower interest expense, almost entirely offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses, higher taxes other than income taxes, lower other income, and higher depreciation and amortization expenses.
Net Revenue 2011 Compared to 2010 Net revenue consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale, 2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory charges (credits).
Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010.
## Table 3 ##
The retail electric price variance is primarily due to formula rate plan decreases effective October 2010 and October 2011.
See Note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing.
The net gas revenue variance is primarily due to milder weather in 2011 compared to 2010.
The gas cost recovery asset variance is primarily due to the recognition in 2010 of a $3 million gas operations regulatory asset associated with the settlement of Entergy New Orleans’s electric and gas formula rate plan case and the amortization of that asset.
See Note 2 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the formula rate plan settlement.
ENTERGY TEXAS, INC.  AND SUBSIDIARIES MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS Plan to Spin Off the Utility’s Transmission Business See the “Plan to Spin Off the Utility’s Transmission Business” section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis for a discussion of this matter, including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities.
Results of Operations Net Income 2011 Compared to 2010 Net income increased by $14.6 million primarily due to higher net revenue, partially offset by higher taxes other than income taxes, higher other operation and maintenance expenses, and higher depreciation and amortization expenses.2010 Compared to 2009 Net income increased by $2.4 million primarily due to higher net revenue and lower interest expense, partially offset by lower other income, higher taxes other than income taxes, and higher other operation and maintenance expenses.
Net Revenue 2011 Compared to 2010 Net revenue consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale, 2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory charges (credits).
Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010.
## Table 4 ##
The retail electric price variance is primarily due to rate actions, including an annual base rate increase of $59 million beginning August 2010, with an additional increase of $9 million beginning May 2011, as a result of the settlement of the December 2009 rate case.
See Note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate case settlement.
The volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 721 GWh, or 4.5%, in billed electricity usage, including the effect of more favorable weather on residential and commercial sales compared to last year.
Usage in the industrial sector increased 8.2% primarily in the chemicals and refining industries.
The purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to price increases for ongoing purchased power capacity and additional capacity purchases.
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Notes to Financial Statements The fair value of debt securities, summarized by contractual maturities, as of December?31, 2017 and 2016 are as follows:

Tables referenced above, in order (Table 0 first):
<table><tr><td></td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="3">(In Millions)</td></tr><tr><td>Fair value of restricted awards as of December 31,</td><td>$6.6</td><td>$8.3</td><td>$4.6</td></tr><tr><td>Compensation expense included in Entergy’s Consolidated Net Incomefor the year</td><td>$3.7</td><td>$3.9</td><td>$2.0</td></tr><tr><td>Tax benefit recognized in Entergy’s Consolidated Net Income for the year</td><td>$1.4</td><td>$1.5</td><td>$0.8</td></tr><tr><td>Compensation cost capitalized as part of fixed assets and inventory</td><td>$0.7</td><td>$0.9</td><td>$0.5</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td>2011</td><td>Utility</td><td>EntergyWholesaleCommodities*</td><td>All Other</td><td>Eliminations</td><td>Consolidated</td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="5">(In Thousands)</td></tr><tr><td>Operating revenues</td><td>$8,841,827</td><td>$2,413,773</td><td>$4,157</td><td>-$30,684</td><td>$11,229,073</td></tr><tr><td>Deprec., amort. & decomm.</td><td>$1,027,597</td><td>$260,638</td><td>$4,562</td><td>$-</td><td>$1,292,797</td></tr><tr><td>Interest and investment income</td><td>$158,737</td><td>$136,492</td><td>$28,830</td><td>-$194,925</td><td>$129,134</td></tr><tr><td>Interest expense</td><td>$455,739</td><td>$20,634</td><td>$121,599</td><td>-$84,345</td><td>$513,627</td></tr><tr><td>Income taxes</td><td>$27,311</td><td>$225,456</td><td>$33,496</td><td>$-</td><td>$286,263</td></tr><tr><td>Consolidated net income (loss)</td><td>$1,123,866</td><td>$491,841</td><td>-$137,755</td><td>-$110,580</td><td>$1,367,372</td></tr><tr><td>Total assets</td><td>$32,734,549</td><td>$10,533,080</td><td>-$507,860</td><td>-$2,058,070</td><td>$40,701,699</td></tr><tr><td>Investment in affiliates - at equity</td><td>$199</td><td>$44,677</td><td>$-</td><td>$-</td><td>$44,876</td></tr><tr><td>Cash paid for long-lived assetadditions</td><td>$2,351,913</td><td>$1,048,146</td><td>-$402</td><td>$-</td><td>$3,399,657</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td>2011</td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>(In Thousands)</td></tr><tr><td>-$118,415</td><td>$49,887</td><td>$52,807</td><td>$61,236</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td></td><td>Amount (In Millions)</td></tr><tr><td>2010 net revenue</td><td>$272.9</td></tr><tr><td>Retail electric price</td><td>-16.9</td></tr><tr><td>Net gas revenue</td><td>-9.1</td></tr><tr><td>Gas cost recovery asset</td><td>-3.0</td></tr><tr><td>Volume/weather</td><td>5.4</td></tr><tr><td>Other</td><td>-2.3</td></tr><tr><td>2011 net revenue</td><td>$247.0</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td></td><td>Amount (In Millions)</td></tr><tr><td>2010 net revenue</td><td>$540.2</td></tr><tr><td>Retail electric price</td><td>36.0</td></tr><tr><td>Volume/weather</td><td>21.3</td></tr><tr><td>Purchased power capacity</td><td>-24.6</td></tr><tr><td>Other</td><td>4.9</td></tr><tr><td>2011 net revenue</td><td>$577.8</td></tr></table>

Question: Is the total amount of all elements in 2011 greater than that in 2010?
Answer: no