Certain of the Company’s derivative contracts contain provisions that adjust the level of collateral the Company is required to post based on the Company’s debt rating (or based on the financial strength of the Company’s life insurance subsidiaries for contracts in which those subsidiaries are the counterparty).
Additionally, certain of the Company’s derivative contracts contain provisions that allow the counterparty to terminate the contract if the Company’s debt does not maintain a specific credit rating (generally an investment grade rating) or the Company’s life insurance subsidiary does not maintain a specific financial strength rating.
If these termination provisions were to be triggered, the Company’s counterparty could require immediate settlement of any net liability position.
At December 31, 2014 and 2013, the aggregate fair value of derivative contracts in a net liability position containing such credit contingent provisions was $416 million and $1.0 billion, respectively.
The aggregate fair value of assets posted as collateral for such instruments as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 was $416 million and $959 million, respectively.
If the credit contingent provisions of derivative contracts in a net liability position at December 31, 2014 and 2013 were triggered, the aggregate fair value of additional assets that would be required to be posted as collateral or needed to settle the instruments immediately would have been nil and $56 million, respectively.17.
Share-Based Compensation The Company’s share-based compensation plans consist of the Amended and Restated Ameriprise Financial 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan (the ‘‘2005 ICP’’), the Ameriprise Financial 2008 Employment Incentive Equity Award Plan (the ‘‘2008 Plan’’), the Ameriprise Financial Franchise Advisor Deferred Compensation Plan (‘‘Franchise Advisor Deferral Plan’’), the Ameriprise Advisor Group Deferred Compensation Plan (‘‘Advisor Group Deferral Plan’’) and the Threadneedle Equity Incentive Plan (‘‘EIP’’).
The components of the Company’s share-based compensation expense, net of forfeitures, were as follows:
## Table 0 ##
(1) Includes $3 million, $10 million and $11 million of expense related to EIP for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
For the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, total income tax benefit recognized by the Company related to share-based compensation expense was $55 million, $60 million and $51 million, respectively.
As of December 31, 2014, there was $94 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested awards under the Company’s share-based compensation plans, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.4 years.
Amended and Restated Ameriprise Financial 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan The 2005 ICP, which was amended and approved by shareholders on April 30, 2014, provides for the grant of cash and equity incentive awards to directors, employees and independent contractors, including stock options, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights, performance shares and similar awards designed to comply with the applicable federal regulations and laws of jurisdiction.
Under the 2005 ICP, a maximum of 54.4 million shares may be issued.
Of this total, no more than 4.5 million shares may be issued after April 30, 2014 for full value awards, which are awards other than stock options and stock appreciation rights.
Shares issued under the 2005 ICP may be authorized and unissued shares or treasury shares.
Ameriprise Financial 2008 Employment Incentive Equity Award Plan The 2008 Plan is designed to align employees’ interests with those of the shareholders of the Company and attract and retain new employees.
The 2008 Plan provides for the grant of equity incentive awards to new employees, primarily those, who became employees in connection with a merger or acquisition, including stock options, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units, and other equity-based awards designed to comply with the applicable federal and foreign regulations and laws of jurisdiction.
Under the 2008 Plan, a maximum of 6.0 million shares may be issued.
key areas such as Europe.
Threadneedle institutional AUM increased $8.5 billion, or 10%, during the year ended December 31, 2013 primarily due to market appreciation of $6.7 billion and a $1.6 billion positive impact of foreign currency translation, partially offset by net outflows.
Threadneedle institutional net outflows of $2.6 billion for the year ended December 31, 2013 primarily reflected $3.7 billion of outflows from legacy insurance assets, partially offset by funding of new mandates and additional flows into existing funds.
The following table presents the results of operations of our Asset Management segment on an operating basis:
## Table 1 ##
NM Not Meaningful.
Our Asset Management segment pretax operating earnings, which exclude net realized gains or losses and integration and restructuring charges, increased $156 million, or 29%, to $691 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to $535 million for the prior year reflecting equity market appreciation, a $30 million gain on the sale of Threadneedle’s strategic business investment in Cofunds, a $19 million benefit from a CLO unwind, continued revenue enhancements related to various pricing adjustments and expense re-engineering, partially offset by the impact of net outflows and retail fund distributions.
Net Revenues Net revenues, which exclude net realized gains or losses, increased $278 million, or 10%, to $3.2 billion for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to $2.9 billion for the prior year driven by increases in management and financial advice fees and net investment income.
Management and financial advice fees increased $223 million, or 9%, to $2.6 billion for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to $2.4 billion for the prior year due to an increase in assets under management, as well as a shift to higher fee retail assets at Threadneedle, revenue enhancements related to various pricing adjustments and $17 million of performance based incentive fees on a CLO unwind.
Average assets under management increased 4% compared to the prior year driven by equity market appreciation, partially offset by net outflows and retail fund distributions.
See our discussion above on the changes in assets under management.
Net investment income, which excludes net realized gains or losses, increased $35 million to $54 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to $19 million for the prior year due to a $30 million gain on the sale of Threadneedle’s strategic business investment in Cofunds, as well as a $10 million gain on a CLO unwind related to our residual interest in the CLO.
Expenses Total expenses, which exclude integration and restructuring charges, increased $122 million, or 5%, to $2.5 billion for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to $2.4 billion for the prior year primarily due to an $83 million increase in distribution expenses driven by higher average retail fund assets and a $36 million increase in general and administrative expense driven by higher performance-based compensation, including $8 million of higher compensation related to a CLO unwind, and investments in the business, partially offset by re-engineering benefits.
PART II.
Item 5.
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities Our common stock is traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol CDNS.
As of February 2, 2019, we had 523 registered stockholders and approximately 56,000 beneficial owners of our common stock.
Stockholder Return Performance Graph The following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the Nasdaq Composite Index, the S&P 500 Index and the S&P 500 Information Technology Index.
The graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index on December 28, 2013 (including reinvestment of dividends) was $100 and tracks it each year thereafter on the last day of our fiscal year through December 29, 2018 and, for each index, on the last day of the calendar year.
COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN* Among Cadence Design Systems, Inc. , the Nasdaq Composite Index, the S&P 500 Index and the S&P 500 Information Technology Index
## Table 2 ##
*$100 invested on 12/28/13 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends.
Fiscal year ending December 29.
Copyright?2019 Standard & Poor’s, a division of S&P Global.
All rights reserved The stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.

Tables referenced above, in order (Table 0 first):
<table><tr><td></td><td colspan="3">December 31,</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="3">(in millions)</td></tr><tr><td>Stock option</td><td>$37</td><td>$36</td><td>$40</td></tr><tr><td>Restricted stock<sup>-1</sup></td><td>26</td><td>46</td><td>40</td></tr><tr><td>Restricted stock units</td><td>67</td><td>61</td><td>54</td></tr><tr><td>Liability awards</td><td>30</td><td>31</td><td>14</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>$160</td><td>$174</td><td>$148</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td></td><td colspan="2">Years Ended December 31,</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td colspan="2">Change</td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="3">(in millions)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Revenues</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Management and financial advice fees</td><td>$2,643</td><td>$2,420</td><td>$223</td><td>9%</td></tr><tr><td>Distribution fees</td><td>469</td><td>442</td><td>27</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>Net investment income</td><td>54</td><td>19</td><td>35</td><td>NM</td></tr><tr><td>Other revenues</td><td>5</td><td>12</td><td>-7</td><td>-58</td></tr><tr><td>Total revenues</td><td>3,171</td><td>2,893</td><td>278</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>Banking and deposit interest expense</td><td>2</td><td>2</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Total net revenues</td><td>3,169</td><td>2,891</td><td>278</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>Expenses</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Distribution expenses</td><td>1,112</td><td>1,029</td><td>83</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>Amortization of deferred acquisition costs</td><td>17</td><td>16</td><td>1</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>Interest and debt expense</td><td>24</td><td>22</td><td>2</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>General and administrative expense</td><td>1,325</td><td>1,289</td><td>36</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>Total expenses</td><td>2,478</td><td>2,356</td><td>122</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>Operating earnings</td><td>$691</td><td>$535</td><td>$156</td><td>29%</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td></td><td>12/28/2013</td><td>1/3/2015</td><td>1/2/2016</td><td>12/31/2016</td><td>12/30/2017</td><td>12/29/2018</td></tr><tr><td>Cadence Design Systems, Inc.</td><td>$100.00</td><td>$135.18</td><td>$149.39</td><td>$181.05</td><td>$300.22</td><td>$311.13</td></tr><tr><td>Nasdaq Composite</td><td>100.00</td><td>112.60</td><td>113.64</td><td>133.19</td><td>172.11</td><td>165.84</td></tr><tr><td>S&P 500</td><td>100.00</td><td>110.28</td><td>109.54</td><td>129.05</td><td>157.22</td><td>150.33</td></tr><tr><td>S&P 500 Information Technology</td><td>100.00</td><td>115.49</td><td>121.08</td><td>144.85</td><td>201.10</td><td>200.52</td></tr></table>

Question: what was the percentage cumulative 5-year total stockholder return for cadence design systems inc . for the period ending 12/29/2018?
Answer: 2.1113
Reasoning program: subtract(311.13,const_100), divide(#0,const_100)