## Table 0 ##
Changes in fair value for available-for-sale investments (debt securities) are recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, while gains and losses from sales are recorded in Realized gains (losses) from sales of investments on the Consolidated Statement of Income.
Unrealized gains (losses) on MSRs are recorded in Commissions and fees on the Consolidated Statement of Income.
Represents the amount of total gains or losses for the period, included in earnings (and Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for changes in fair value for available-for-sale investments), attributable to the change in fair value relating to assets and liabilities classified as Level 3 that are still held at December 31, 2010 and 2009.
Total Level 3 derivative exposures have been netted in these tables for presentation purposes only.
The significant changes from December 31, 2009 to December 31, 2010 in Level 3 assets and liabilities are due to: A net decrease in Trading securities of $20.8鈥痓illion that was driven by: A net decrease of $10.2鈥痓illion in trading mortgage-backed securities driven mainly by liquidations of subprime securities of $7.5鈥痓illion and commercial mortgage-backed securities of $1.8鈥痓illion; A net increase of $3.6鈥痓illion in asset-backed securities including Transfers to Level 3 of $4.9鈥痓illion.
Substantially all of these Level 3 transfers related to the reclassification of certain securities to Trading under the fair value option upon adoption of ASU 2010-11 on July 1, 2010, as described in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(For purposes of the Level 3 roll-forward table above, Level 3 investments that were reclassified to trading upon adoption of ASU 2010-11 have been classified as transfers to Level 3 Trading securities); and A decrease of $11.9鈥痓illion in Other debt securities, due primarily to the impact of the consolidation of the credit card securitization trusts by the Company upon adoption of SFAS 166/167 on January 1, 2010.
Upon consolidation of the trusts, the Company recorded the underlying credit card receivables on its balance sheet as Loans accounted for at amortized cost.
At January 1, 2010, the Company鈥檚 investments in the trusts and other inter-company balances are eliminated.
At January 1, 2010, the Company鈥檚 investment in these newly consolidated VIEs, which is eliminated for accounting purposes, included certificates issued by these trusts of $11.1鈥痓illion that were classified as Level 3 at December 31, 2009.
The impact of the elimination of these certificates has been reflected as net settlements in the Level 3 roll-forward table聽above.
The decrease in Derivatives of $4.5鈥痓illion includes net trading losses of $1.5聽billion, net settlements of $2.4鈥痓illion and net transfers out of Level 3 to Level 2 of $0.6鈥痓illion.
The net decrease in Level 3 Investments of $4.1鈥痓illion included net sales of asset-backed securities of $2.6鈥痓illion and sales of non-marketable equity securities of $1鈥痓illion.
The net increase in Loans of $3鈥痓illion is due largely to the Company鈥檚 consolidation of certain VIEs upon the adoption of SFAS 167 on January聽1, 2010, for which the fair value option was elected.
The impact from consolidation of these VIEs on Level 3 loans has been reflected as purchases in the Level 3 roll-forward above.
The decrease in Mortgage servicing rights of $2鈥痓illion is due primarily to losses of $1.1鈥痓illion, due to a reduction in interest rates.
The decrease in Long-term debt of $1.2鈥痓illion is driven mainly by $1.3聽billion of net terminations of structured notes.
segment (Note 27).
Such proceeds will be deferred until the transfer of title to the Frankfurt, Germany Airport.
Changes in asset retirement obligations are as follows:
## Table 1 ##
(1) Primarily relates to sites which management no longer considers to have an indeterminate life.
(2) Primarily relates to revisions to the estimated cost of future plant closures.
Included in the asset retirement obligations for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 is $10 million and $10 million, respectively, related to indemnifications received for a business acquired in 2005.
The Company has a corresponding receivable of $6 million in Non-trade receivables, net and $4 million included in noncurrent Other assets in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2012.
Periodically, the Company will conclude a site no longer has an indeterminate life based on long-lived asset impairment triggering events and decisions made by the Company.
Accordingly, the Company will record asset retirement obligations associated with such sites.
To measure the fair value of the asset retirement obligations, the Company will use the expected present value technique which is classified as a Level 3 measurement under FASB ASC Topic 820.
The expected present value technique uses a set of cash flows that represent the probability-weighted average of all possible cash flows based on the Company's judgment.
The Company uses the following inputs to determine the fair value of the asset retirement obligations based on the Company's experience with fulfilling obligations of this type and the Company's knowledge of market conditions: a) labor costs; b) allocation of overhead costs; c) profit on labor and overhead costs; d) effect of inflation on estimated costs and profits; e) risk premium for bearing the uncertainty inherent in cash flows, other than inflation; f) time value of money represented by the risk-free interest rate commensurate with the timing of the associated cash flows; and g) nonperformance risk relating to the liability which includes the Company's own credit risk.
The Company has identified but not recognized asset retirement obligations related to certain of its existing operating facilities.
Examples of these types of obligations include demolition, decommissioning, disposal and restoration activities.
Legal obligations exist in connection with the retirement of these assets upon closure of the facilities or abandonment of the existing operations.
However, the Company currently plans on continuing operations at these facilities indefinitely and therefore a reasonable estimate of fair value cannot be determined at this time.
In the event the Company considers plans to abandon or cease operations at these sites, an asset retirement obligation will be reassessed at that time.
If certain operating facilities were to close, the related asset retirement obligations could significantly affect the Company's results of operations and cash flows.13.
Debt
## Table 2 ##
The Company's weighted average interest rate on short-term borrowings, including amounts due to affiliates, was 4.0% as of December 31, 2012 compared to 4.3% as of December 31, 2011.
Liabilities A summary of our liabilities is as follows:
## Table 3 ##
?
Changes in current liabilities from 2006 to 2007 were primarily the result of the following: ?
Higher accounts payable reflecting the effect of working capital improvement initiatives; ?
Higher accrued liabilities primarily associated with the 2007 business realignment initiatives and higher expected employee benefit payments; and ?
An increase in short-term debt reflecting commercial paper borrowings, partially offset by a decrease in the current-portion of long-term debt primarily resulting from the payment of 6.95% Notes due in March 2007.  ?
The increase in long-term debt in 2007 was primarily associated with debt assumed through the Godrej Hershey Foods and Beverages Company acquisition.  ?
The increase in other long-term liabilities and a corresponding decrease in deferred income taxes of $56.4 million in 2007 were associated with the reclassification of unrecognized tax benefits from deferred income taxes to other long-term liabilities in accordance with the adoption of FIN No.48, discussed further in Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
The residual decrease in deferred income taxes is primarily attributable to the effect of the 2007 business realignment initiatives.
Capital Structure We have two classes of stock outstanding, Common Stock and Class B Stock.
Holders of the Common Stock and the Class B Stock generally vote together without regard to class on matters submitted to stockholders, including the election of directors.
Holders of the Common Stock have one vote per share.
Holders of the Class B Stock have ten votes per share.
Holders of the Common Stock, voting separately as a class, are entitled to elect one-sixth of our Board of Directors.
With respect to dividend rights, holders of the Common Stock are entitled to cash dividends 10% higher than those declared and paid on the Class B Stock.
Hershey Trust Company, as trustee for the benefit of Milton Hershey School (the “Milton Hershey School Trust” or the “Trust”) maintains voting control over The Hershey Company.
Historically, the Milton Hershey School Trust had not taken an active role in setting our policy, nor has it exercised influence with regard to the ongoing business decisions of our Board of Directors or management.
However, in October 2007, the Chairman of the Board of the Milton Hershey School Trust issued a statement indicating that the Trust continues to be guided by two key principles: first, that, in its role as controlling stockholder of the Company, it intends to retain its controlling interest in The Hershey Company and, second, that the long-term prosperity of the Company requires the Board of Directors of the Company and its management to build on its strong U. S.  position by aggressively pursuing strategies for domestic and international growth.
He further stated that the Milton Hershey School Trust had communicated to the Company’s Board that the Trust was not satisfied with the Company’s results and that, as a result, the Trust was “actively engaged in an ongoing process, the goal of which has been to ensure vigorous Company Board focus on resolving the Company’s current business challenges and on implementing new growth strategies.
” In that release, the Trust board chairman reiterated the Trust’s longstanding position that the Company Board, and not the Trust board, “is solely responsible and accountable for the Company’s management and performance.
”
Financial Services Segment We have one Financial Services reportable segment that provides mortgage financing, title insurance, closing services and other ancillary services (including personal lines insurance, high-speed Internet and cable television) for both buyers of our homes and others.
The Financial Services segment sold substantially all of the loans it originated in the secondary mortgage market on a servicing released, non-recourse basis; however, we remain liable for certain limited representations and warranties related to loan sales.
The following table sets forth selected financial and operational information relating to our Financial Services segment.
The results of operations of companies we acquired during these years are included in the table since the respective dates of the acquisitions.
## Table 4 ##
Financial Condition and Capital Resources At November 30, 2006, we had cash related to our homebuilding and financial services operations of $778.3 million, compared to $1.1 billion at November 30, 2005.
The decrease in cash was primarily due to repayment of debt, a decrease in accounts payable and other liabilities, contributions to unconsolidated entities and repurchases of common stock, partially offset by our net earnings, distributions of capital from unconsolidated entities and proceeds from debt issuances.
We finance our land acquisition and development activities, construction activities, financial services activities and general operating needs primarily with cash generated from our operations and public debt issuances, as well as cash borrowed under our revolving credit facility, issuances of commercial paper and unsecured, fixed-rate notes and borrowings under our warehouse lines of credit.
Operating Cash Flow Activities During 2006 and 2005, cash flows provided by operating activities amounted to $554.7 million and $323.0 million, respectively.
During 2006, cash flows provided by operating activities consisted primarily of net earnings, distributions of earnings from unconsolidated entities and the change in inventories, including inventory write-offs and valuation adjustments, partially offset by the deferred income tax benefit and a decrease in accounts payable and other liabilities.
During 2005, cash flows provided by operating activities consisted primarily of net earnings, an increase in accounts payable and other liabilities and distributions of earnings from unconsolidated entities partially offset by an increase in inventories due to an increase in construction in progress to support a significantly higher backlog and land purchases to facilitate future growth, an increase in receivables resulting primarily from land sales and equity in earnings from unconsolidated entities.
Investing Cash Flow Activities Cash flows used in investing activities totaled $406.5 million during 2006, compared to $1.0 billion in 2005.
In 2006, we used $33.2 million of cash for acquisitions and $729.3 million of cash was contributed to unconsolidated entities.
This usage of cash was partially offset by $321.6 million of distributions of capital from unconsolidated entities.
In 2005, we used $416.0 million of cash for acquisitions and $919.8 million of cash was contributed to unconsolidated entities.
We also had an increase in financial services loans held-for-investment of $117.4 million.
This usage of cash was partially offset by $466.8 million of distributions of capital from unconsolidated entities.

Tables referenced above, in order (Table 0 first):
<table><tr><td></td><td></td><td colspan="2">Net realized/unrealized gains (losses) included in</td><td>Transfers in and/or</td><td>Purchases, issuances</td><td></td><td>Unrealized gains</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>December 31,</td><td>Principal</td><td></td><td>out of</td><td>and</td><td>December 31,</td><td>(losses)</td></tr><tr><td>In millions of dollars</td><td>2008</td><td>transactions</td><td>Other-1(2)</td><td>Level 3</td><td>settlements</td><td>2009</td><td>still held-3</td></tr><tr><td>State and municipal</td><td>$222</td><td>$—</td><td>$2</td><td>$-13</td><td>$6</td><td>$217</td><td>$—</td></tr><tr><td>Foreign government</td><td>571</td><td>—</td><td>-6</td><td>-302</td><td>7</td><td>270</td><td>-3</td></tr><tr><td>Corporate</td><td>1,019</td><td>—</td><td>13</td><td>762</td><td>-537</td><td>1,257</td><td>16</td></tr><tr><td>Equity securities</td><td>3,807</td><td>—</td><td>-453</td><td>-146</td><td>-695</td><td>2,513</td><td>41</td></tr><tr><td>Other debt securities</td><td>11,324</td><td>—</td><td>279</td><td>-1,292</td><td>-1,479</td><td>8,832</td><td>-81</td></tr><tr><td>Non-marketable equity securities</td><td>9,067</td><td>—</td><td>-538</td><td>-137</td><td>-1,639</td><td>6,753</td><td>69</td></tr><tr><td>Total investments</td><td>$28,273</td><td>$—</td><td>$-379</td><td>$-1,505</td><td>$-4,986</td><td>$21,403</td><td>$467</td></tr><tr><td>Loans</td><td>$160</td><td>$—</td><td>$51</td><td>$7</td><td>$-5</td><td>$213</td><td>$9</td></tr><tr><td>Mortgage servicing rights</td><td>5,657</td><td>—</td><td>1,543</td><td>—</td><td>-670</td><td>6,530</td><td>1,582</td></tr><tr><td>Other financial assets measured on a</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>recurring basis</td><td>359</td><td>—</td><td>305</td><td>761</td><td>-324</td><td>1,101</td><td>215</td></tr><tr><td>Liabilities</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Interest-bearing deposits</td><td>$54</td><td>$—</td><td>$2</td><td>$-6</td><td>$-18</td><td>$28</td><td>$-14</td></tr><tr><td>Federal funds purchased and securities</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>loaned or sold under agreements</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>to repurchase</td><td>11,167</td><td>359</td><td>—</td><td>-8,601</td><td>-151</td><td>2,056</td><td>250</td></tr><tr><td>Trading account liabilities</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Securities sold, not yet purchased</td><td>653</td><td>-11</td><td>—</td><td>-180</td><td>290</td><td>774</td><td>-52</td></tr><tr><td>Short-term borrowings</td><td>1,329</td><td>-48</td><td>—</td><td>-775</td><td>-371</td><td>231</td><td>-76</td></tr><tr><td>Long-term debt</td><td>11,198</td><td>-290</td><td>—</td><td>-504</td><td>-1,330</td><td>9,654</td><td>124</td></tr><tr><td>Other financial liabilities measured on a</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>recurring basis</td><td>1</td><td>—</td><td>-75</td><td>—</td><td>-63</td><td>13</td><td>—</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td></td><td colspan="3">Year Ended December 31,</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="3">(In $ millions)</td></tr><tr><td>Balance at beginning of year</td><td>64</td><td>77</td><td>67</td></tr><tr><td>Additions<sup>-1</sup></td><td>3</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Accretion</td><td>3</td><td>3</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>Payments</td><td>-12</td><td>-10</td><td>-15</td></tr><tr><td>Revisions to cash flow estimates<sup>-2</sup></td><td>5</td><td>-5</td><td>23</td></tr><tr><td>Exchange rate changes</td><td>1</td><td>-1</td><td>-1</td></tr><tr><td>Balance at end of year</td><td>64</td><td>64</td><td>77</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td></td><td colspan="2">As of December 31,</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="2">(In $ millions)</td></tr><tr><td>Short-Term Borrowings and Current Installments of Long-Term Debt - Third Party and Affiliates</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Current installments of long-term debt</td><td>60</td><td>38</td></tr><tr><td>Short-term borrowings, including amounts due to affiliates</td><td>108</td><td>106</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>168</td><td>144</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td> December 31,</td><td> 2007</td><td> 2006</td></tr><tr><td> In thousands of dollars</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Current liabilities</td><td>$1,618,770</td><td>$1,453,538</td></tr><tr><td>Long-term debt</td><td>1,279,965</td><td>1,248,128</td></tr><tr><td>Other long-term liabilities</td><td>544,016</td><td>486,473</td></tr><tr><td>Deferred income taxes</td><td>180,842</td><td>286,003</td></tr><tr><td>Total liabilities</td><td>$3,623,593</td><td>$3,474,142</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td></td><td colspan="3"> Years Ended November 30, </td></tr><tr><td></td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td> 2004 </td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="3"> (Dollars in thousands)</td></tr><tr><td> Revenues</td><td>$643,622</td><td>562,372</td><td>500,336</td></tr><tr><td> Costs and expenses</td><td>493,819</td><td>457,604</td><td>389,605</td></tr><tr><td> Operating earnings from continuing operations</td><td>$149,803</td><td>104,768</td><td>110,731</td></tr><tr><td>Dollar value of mortgages originated</td><td>$10,480,000</td><td>9,509,000</td><td>7,517,000</td></tr><tr><td>Number of mortgages originated</td><td>41,800</td><td>42,300</td><td>37,900</td></tr><tr><td>Mortgage capture rate of Lennar homebuyers</td><td>66%</td><td>66%</td><td>71%</td></tr><tr><td>Number of title and closing service transactions</td><td>161,300</td><td>187,700</td><td>187,700</td></tr><tr><td>Number of title policies issued</td><td>195,700</td><td>193,900</td><td>185,100</td></tr></table>

Question: What is the growing rate of Other long-term liabilities in the years with the least Number of title and closing service transactions?
Answer: 0.11829
Reasoning program: subtract(544016,486473), divide(#0,486473)