Notes to the Financial Statements — Continued In July 2012, Con Edison Development purchased a company that is developing 70 MW (AC) of solar energy projects in Alpaugh, California (Alpaugh).
Electricity generated by the projects is to be purchased by Pacific Gas and Electric Company pursuant to long-term power purchase agreements (PPA).
Alpaugh was purchased for $288 million, including contingent consideration of $2 million and $4 million in deposits relating to the PPA and interconnection agreements.
The total cost to acquire and construct these projects was $340 million.
Alpaugh commenced commercial operation in December 2012.
In October 2012, Con Edison Development purchased two companies that are developing 40 MW (AC) of solar energy projects in Tulare and Kings County, California.
Electricity generated by the projects is to be purchased by Pacific Gas and Electric Company pursuant to long-term PPAs.
The projects were purchased for approximately $51 million, of which $39 million has been allocated to construction work in progress and $12 million to deposits relating to the PPA and interconnection agreements.
The total cost to acquire and construct these projects is estimated to be $200 million.
Note O — Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities Under the accounting rules for derivatives and hedging, derivatives are recognized on the balance sheet at fair value, unless an exception is available under the accounting rules.
Certain qualifying derivative contracts have been designated as normal purchases or normal sales contracts.
These contracts are not reported at fair value under the accounting rules.
Energy Price Hedging Con Edison’s subsidiaries hedge market price fluctuations associated with physical purchases and sales of electricity, natural gas, and steam by using derivative instruments including futures, forwards, basis swaps, options, transmission congestion contracts and financial transmission rights contracts.
The fair values of these hedges at December 31, 2012 and 2011 were as follows:
## Table 0 ##
Credit Exposure The Companies are exposed to credit risk related to transactions entered into primarily for the various energy supply and hedging activities by the Utilities and the competitive energy businesses.
The Companies use credit policies to manage this risk, including an established credit approval process, monitoring of counterparty limits, netting provisions within agreements, collateral or prepayment arrangements, credit insurance and credit default swaps.
At December 31, 2012, Con Edison and CECONY had $113 million and $19 million of credit exposure in connection with energy supply and hedging activities, net of collateral, respectively.
Con Edison’s net credit exposure consisted of $41 million with investment-grade counterparties, $41 million with commodity exchange brokers, $28 million with independent system operators and $3 million with noninvestment grade/non-rated counterparties.
CECONY’s net credit exposure consisted of $1 million with investment-grade counterparties and $18 million with commodity exchange brokers.
Economic Hedges The Companies enter into certain derivative instruments that do not qualify or are not designated as hedges under the accounting rules for derivatives and hedging.
However, management believes these instruments represent economic hedges that mitigate exposure to fluctuations in commodity prices.
facilities, were $3,735 million and $3,455 million at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
Natural gas is delivered by pipeline to CECONY at various points in its service territory and is distributed to customers by the company through an estimated 4,360 miles of main and 387,881 service lines.
The company owns a natural gas liquefaction facility and storage tank at its Astoria property in Queens, New York.
The plant can store approximately 1,000 mdths of which a maximum of about 250 mdths can be withdrawn per day.
The company has about 1,226 mdths of additional natural gas storage capacity at a field in upstate CECONY’s gas sales and deliveries for the last five years were: New York, owned and operated by Honeoye Storage Corporation, a corporation 28.8 percent owned by CECONY and 71.2 percent owned by Con Edison Development.
Gas Sales and Deliveries The company generally recovers the cost of the gas that it buys and then sells to its firm sales customers.
It does not make any margin or profit on the gas it sells.
CECONY’s gas revenues are subject to a weather normalization clause and a revenue decoupling mechanism.
As a result, its gas delivery revenues are generally not affected by changes in delivery volumes from levels assumed when rates were approved.
## Table 1 ##
(a) Includes 563, 3,801, 3,385, 2,851 and 2,955 mdths for 2012, 2011, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively, which are also reflected in firm transportation and other.
## Table 2 ##
For further discussion of the company’s gas operating revenues and its gas results, see “Results of Operations” in Item 7.
For additional segment information, see Note N to the financial statements in Item 8
SYNOPSYS, INC.  NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—Continued acquired identifiable intangible assets of $107.3 million, resulting in total goodwill of $257.6 million.
Identifiable intangible assets are being amortized over three to eight years.
Acquisition-related costs directly attributable to the business combination were $6.6 million for fiscal 2012 and were expensed as incurred in the consolidated statements of operations.
These costs consisted primarily of employee separation costs and professional services.
Acquisition of Magma Design Automation, Inc.  (Magma) On February 22, 2012, the Company acquired Magma, a chip design software provider, at a pershare price of $7.35.
Additionally, the Company assumed unvested restricted stock units (RSUs) and stock options, collectively called “equity awards.
” The aggregate purchase price was approximately $550.2 million.
This acquisition enables the Company to more rapidly meet the needs of leading-edge semiconductor designers for more sophisticated design tools.
The Company allocated the total purchase consideration of $550.2 million (including $6.8 million related to equity awards assumed) to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their respective fair values at the acquisition date, including acquired identifiable intangible assets of $184.3 million, resulting in total goodwill of $316.3 million.
Identifiable intangible assets are being amortized over three to ten years.
Acquisition-related costs directly attributable to the business combination totaling $33.5 million for fiscal 2012 were expensed as incurred in the consolidated statements of operations and consist primarily of employee separation costs, contract terminations, professional services, and facilities closure costs.
Other Fiscal 2012 Acquisitions During fiscal 2012, the Company acquired five other companies, including Emulation & Verification Engineering, S. A.
(EVE), for cash and allocated the total purchase consideration of $213.2 million to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their respective fair values, resulting in total goodwill of $118.1 million.
Acquired identifiable intangible assets totaling $73.3 million were valued using appropriate valuation methods such as income or cost methods and are being amortized over their respective useful lives ranging from one to eight years.
During fiscal 2012, acquisition-related costs totaling $6.8 million were expensed as incurred in the consolidated statements of operations.
Fiscal 2011 Acquisitions During fiscal 2011, the Company completed two acquisitions for cash and allocated the total purchase consideration of $37.4 million to the assets and liabilities acquired based on their respective fair values at the acquisition date resulting in goodwill of $30.6 million.
Acquired identifiable intangible assets of $9.3 million are being amortized over two to ten years.
Note 4.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Goodwill:

Tables referenced above, in order (Table 0 first):
<table><tr><td></td><td colspan="2"> Con Edison</td><td colspan="2"> CECONY</td></tr><tr><td> (Millions of Dollars)</td><td> 2012</td><td> 2011</td><td> 2012</td><td> 2011</td></tr><tr><td>Fair value of net derivative assets/(liabilities) – gross</td><td>$-90</td><td>$-249</td><td>$-56</td><td>$-144</td></tr><tr><td>Impact of netting of cash collateral</td><td>84</td><td>110</td><td>47</td><td>46</td></tr><tr><td>Fair value of net derivative assets/(liabilities) – net</td><td>$-6</td><td>$-139</td><td>$-9</td><td>$-98</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td></td><td colspan="5"> Year Ended December 31,</td></tr><tr><td></td><td> 2008</td><td> 2009</td><td> 2010</td><td> 2011</td><td> 2012</td></tr><tr><td> Gas Delivered (mdth)</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Firm Sales</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Full service</td><td>68,943</td><td>67,994</td><td>63,592</td><td>64,696</td><td> 57,595</td></tr><tr><td>Firm transportation</td><td>43,245</td><td>48,671</td><td>51,859</td><td>54,291</td><td> 52,860</td></tr><tr><td> Total Firm Sales and Transportation</td><td>112,188</td><td>116,665</td><td>115,451</td><td>118,987</td><td> 110,455</td></tr><tr><td>Interruptible Sales(a)</td><td>11,220</td><td>8,225</td><td>8,521</td><td>10,035</td><td> 5,961</td></tr><tr><td> Total Gas Sold to CECONY Customers</td><td>123,408</td><td>124,890</td><td>123,972</td><td>129,022</td><td> 116,416</td></tr><tr><td>Transportation of customer-owned gas</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>NYPA</td><td>44,694</td><td>37,764</td><td>24,890</td><td>34,893</td><td> 48,107</td></tr><tr><td>Other (mainly generating plants)</td><td>94,086</td><td>86,454</td><td>99,666</td><td>97,163</td><td> 108,086</td></tr><tr><td>Off-System Sales</td><td>154</td><td>1</td><td>7</td><td>97</td><td> 730</td></tr><tr><td> Total Sales and Transportation</td><td>262,342</td><td>249,109</td><td>248,535</td><td>261,175</td><td> 273,339</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td></td><td colspan="5"> Year Ended December 31,</td></tr><tr><td></td><td> 2008</td><td> 2009</td><td>2010</td><td>2011</td><td> 2012</td></tr><tr><td> Gas Delivered ($ in millions)</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Firm Sales</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Full service</td><td>$1,332</td><td>$1,229</td><td>$1,099</td><td>$1,048</td><td>$889</td></tr><tr><td>Firm transportation</td><td>202</td><td>266</td><td>347</td><td>356</td><td>380</td></tr><tr><td> Total Firm Sales and Transportation</td><td>1,534</td><td>1,495</td><td>1,446</td><td>1,404</td><td>1,269</td></tr><tr><td>Interruptible Sales</td><td>138</td><td>75</td><td>60</td><td>75</td><td>35</td></tr><tr><td> Total Gas Sold to CECONY Customers</td><td>1,672</td><td>1,570</td><td>1,506</td><td>1,479</td><td>1,304</td></tr><tr><td>Transportation of customer-owned gas</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>NYPA</td><td>4</td><td>4</td><td>2</td><td>2</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>Other (mainly generating plants)</td><td>85</td><td>73</td><td>87</td><td>84</td><td>72</td></tr><tr><td>Off-System Sales</td><td>1</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>Other operating revenues (mainly regulatory amortizations)</td><td>77</td><td>54</td><td>-54</td><td>-44</td><td>37</td></tr><tr><td> Total Sales and Transportation</td><td>$1,839</td><td>$1,701</td><td>$1,541</td><td>$1,521</td><td>$1,420</td></tr><tr><td>Average Revenue per dth Sold</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Residential</td><td>$21.15</td><td>$20.33</td><td>$19.31</td><td>$18.45</td><td>$18.14</td></tr><tr><td>General</td><td>$16.77</td><td>$14.91</td><td>$14.28</td><td>$12.96</td><td>$11.68</td></tr></table>

Question: In the year with lowest amount of Firm transportation, what's the increasing rate of Full service？
Answer: -0.01376
Reasoning program: subtract(67994,68943), divide(#0,68943)