Other expense
## Table 0 ##
Other expense of $239 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 included $72 million for a settlement agreement of gas transportation contracts at Gener.
There were also previously capitalized transaction costs of $22 million that were incurred in connection with the preparation for the sale of a noncontrolling interest in our Wind Generation business which were written off upon the expiration of the letter of intent in June 2010.
In addition, there were losses on the disposal of assets at Eletropaulo, Panama, and Gener, an $18 million loss on debt extinguishment at Andres and Itabo and a $15 million loss at the Parent Company from the retirement of senior notes.
Other expense of $111 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 included a $13 million loss recognized when three of our businesses in the Dominican Republic received $110 million par value bonds issued by the Dominican Republic government to settle existing accounts receivable for the same amount from the government-owned distribution companies.
The loss represented an adjustment to reflect the fair value of the bonds on the date received.
Other expense also included losses on the disposal of assets at Eletropaulo and Andres and contingencies at our businesses in Kazakhstan and Alicura in Argentina.
Other expense of $161 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 included $69 million of losses on the retirement of debt at the Parent Company in connection with the refinancing in June 2008 and IPALCO associated with a $375 million refinancing in April 2008 and losses on disposal of assets primarily at Eletropaulo.
Goodwill Impairment In 2010, the Company recognized goodwill impairment expense of $21 million.
During the third quarter of 2010, Deepwater, our pet coke-fired merchant generation facility in Texas, determined that there was an interim impairment indicator for its goodwill.
This determination was primarily based on management’s decision not to operate the plant for more than 30 days in the third quarter of 2010, current operating and cash flow losses, and forecasted operating and cash flow losses for the remainder of 2010 through 2014 as a result of declining trends in energy pricing curves and increasing pet coke prices.
As a result, Deepwater recognized a goodwill impairment of $18 million.
Deepwater is reported in the North America Generation segment.
In 2009, the Company recognized goodwill impairment expense of $122 million.
This was a result of impairment at certain of our businesses in the United Kingdom and Ukraine as a result of the Company’s annual goodwill impairment evaluation as of October 1.
The most significant goodwill impairment was at Kilroot, our generation business in the United Kingdom.
Factors contributing to the recognition of impairment included: reduced profit expectations based on latest estimates of future commodity prices and reduced expectations on the recovery of cash flows on the existing plant following the Company’s decision to forgo capital expenditures to meet emission allowance requirements taking effect in 2024.
The fair value of the Company’s reporting units are inherently sensitive to the assumptions underlying the estimates of fair value.
Note 1—General and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, Fair Value, Goodwill and Intangibles in Item 8 of this Form 10-K provides a
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Capital transactions with the Financial Services sector of $4.2 billion in 2004 reflected primarily dividends paid by Ford Credit.
In addition, dividends of about $200 million from the Financial Services sector in 2004 are reflected in the table above as divestitures because they resulted primarily from the sale by the Financial Services sector of dealership and surplus properties.
Shown in the table below is a reconciliation between financial statement Cash flows from operating activities before securities trading and operating-related cash flows (calculated as shown in the table above), for the last three years (in billions):
## Table 1 ##
a/ As shown in our Sector Statement of Cash Flows for the Automotive sector.
b/ Primarily payables and receivables between the sectors in the normal course of business, as shown in our Sector Statement of Cash Flows for the Automotive sector.
Debt and Net Cash.
At December 31, 2004, our Automotive sector had total senior debt of $13.3 billion compared with $15.0 billion a year ago.
The decrease in debt primarily reflected the retirement of about $1.5 billion of relatively high-cost debt through open-market repurchases.
Most of the retired debt had maturity dates between 2028 and 2032.
During 2005, we intend, depending on market conditions, to continue repurchasing our outstanding debt securities from time to time and to continue making contributions to our funded pension plans and VEBA.
Such debt repurchases likely would be concentrated in, but not limited to, the following four debt issues, of which up to 50% of any one issue potentially may be purchased: 6-5/8% Debentures due October 1, 2028 with an original aggregate principal amount of $1.5 billion; 6-3/8% Debentures due February 1, 2029 with an original aggregate principal amount of $1.5 billion; 7.45% Global Landmark Securities due July 16, 2031 with an original aggregate principal amount of $4.8 billion; and 8.90% Debentures due January 15, 2032 with an original aggregate principal amount of $502 million.
Ford Motor Company Capital Trust II (“Trust II”) had outstanding $5.0 billion of trust preferred securities at December 31, 2004.
The dividend and liquidation preference on these securities are paid from interest and principal payments on our junior subordinated debentures held by Trust II in a principal amount of $5.2 billion.
On January 2, 2004, we redeemed our outstanding junior subordinated debentures held by Ford Motor Company Capital Trust I.
This had the effect of reducing total Automotive subordinated debt by about $700 million.
At December 31, 2004, our Automotive sector had net cash (defined as gross cash less total senior and subordinated debt) of $5.2 billion, compared with $5.1 billion and $5.4 billion at the end of 2003 and 2002, respectively.
The weighted average maturity of our total long-term debt (including subordinated debt), substantially all of which is fixed-rate debt, is approximately 25 years with about $3.7 billion maturing by December 31, 2024.
The weighted average maturity of total debt (long-term and short-term including subordinated debt) is approximately 25 years.
For additional information on debt, see Note 15 of the Notes to the Financial Statements.
Seasonal Working Capital Funding.
In July 2004, we raised $2.3 billion of short-term (i. e. , less than 90 days) bank loans to finance our annual summer vacation plant shutdown.
The shutdown period normally results in temporary cash outflow as cash payments to suppliers and dealers continue, but vehicles are not produced.
The short-term seasonal working capital funding reduced the annual cash volatility that results from our shutdown period.
Similarly, we raised $1.9 billion in January 2005 to finance our annual holiday shutdown at the end of 2004.  Credit Facilities.
At December 31, 2004, the Automotive sector had $7.2 billion of contractually committed credit agreements with various banks, of which $7.1 billion were available for use.
For further discussion of our committed credit facilities, see Note 15 of the Notes to the Financial Statements.
NOTE 18 REGULATORY MATTERS We are subject to the regulations of certain federal, state, and foreign agencies and undergo periodic examinations by such regulatory authorities.
The ability to undertake new business initiatives (including acquisitions), the access to and cost of funding for new business initiatives, the ability to pay dividends, the ability to repurchase shares or other capital instruments, the level of deposit insurance costs, and the level and nature of regulatory oversight depend, in large part, on a financial institution’s capital strength.
At December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, PNC and PNC Bank, our domestic banking subsidiary, were both considered “well capitalized,” based on applicable U. S.  regulatory capital ratio requirements.
The following table sets forth the Transitional Basel III regulatory capital ratios at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 for PNC and PNC Bank.
Table 97: Basel Regulatory Capital (a)
## Table 2 ##
(a) Calculated using the Transitional Basel III regulatory capital methodology applicable to us during both 2016 and 2015.
The principal source of parent company cash flow is the dividends it receives from its subsidiary bank, which may be impacted by the following: ?
Capital needs, ?
Laws and regulations, ?
Corporate policies, ?
Contractual restrictions, and ?
Other factors.
Also, there are statutory and regulatory limitations on the ability of national banks to pay dividends or make other capital distributions.
The amount available for dividend payments to the parent company by PNC Bank without prior regulatory approval was approximately $1.7 billion at December 31, 2016.
Under federal law, a bank subsidiary generally may not extend credit to, or engage in other types of covered transactions (including the purchase of assets) with, the parent company or its non-bank subsidiaries on terms and under circumstances that are not substantially the same as comparable transactions with nonaffiliates.
A bank subsidiary may not extend credit to, or engage in a covered transaction with, the parent company or a non-bank subsidiary if the aggregate amount of the bank’s extensions of credit and other covered transactions with the parent company or non-bank subsidiary exceeds 10% of the capital stock and surplus of such bank subsidiary or the aggregate amount of the bank’s extensions of credit and other covered transactions with the parent company and all non-bank subsidiaries exceeds 20% of the capital and surplus of such bank subsidiary.
Such extensions of credit, with limited exceptions, must be at least fully collateralized in accordance with specified collateralization thresholds, with the thresholds varying based on the type of assets serving as collateral.
In certain circumstances, federal regulatory authorities may impose more restrictive limitations.
Federal Reserve Board regulations require depository institutions to maintain cash reserves with a Federal Reserve Bank (FRB).
At December 31, 2016, the balance outstanding at the FRB was $25.1 billion.
NOTE 19 LEGAL PROCEEDINGS We establish accruals for legal proceedings, including litigation and regulatory and governmental investigations and inquiries, when information related to the loss contingencies represented by those matters indicates both that a loss is probable and that the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated.
Any such accruals are adjusted thereafter as appropriate to reflect changed circumstances.
When we are able to do so, we also determine estimates of possible losses or ranges of possible losses, whether in excess of any related accrued liability or where there is no accrued liability, for disclosed legal proceedings (“Disclosed Matters,” which are those matters disclosed in this Note 19).
For Disclosed Matters where we are able to estimate such possible losses or ranges of possible losses, as of December 31, 2016, we estimate that it is reasonably possible that we could incur losses in excess of related accrued liabilities, if any, in an aggregate amount of up to approximately $475 million.
The estimates included in this amount are based on our analysis of currently available information and are subject to significant

Tables referenced above, in order (Table 0 first):
<table><tr><td></td><td colspan="3"> Years Ended December 31,</td></tr><tr><td></td><td> 2010</td><td> 2009</td><td> 2008</td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="3"> (in millions)</td></tr><tr><td>Loss on sale and disposal of assets</td><td>$84</td><td>$42</td><td>$34</td></tr><tr><td>Gener gas settlement</td><td>72</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Loss on extinguishment of debt</td><td>37</td><td>—</td><td>70</td></tr><tr><td>AES Wind transaction costs</td><td>22</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Other</td><td>24</td><td>69</td><td>57</td></tr><tr><td>Total other expense</td><td>$239</td><td>$111</td><td>$161</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td></td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td><td>2002</td></tr><tr><td>Cash flows from operating activities before securities trading (a)</td><td>$1.4</td><td>$1.3</td><td>$9.5</td></tr><tr><td>Items included in operating-related cash flow</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Capital expenditures</td><td>-6.3</td><td>-7.4</td><td>-6.8</td></tr><tr><td>Net transactions between Automotive and Financial Services sectors (b)</td><td>1.3</td><td>1.2</td><td>-0.1</td></tr><tr><td>Other, primarily exclusion of cash flow from short-term VEBA contribution/(draw-down)</td><td>-0.1</td><td>1.9</td><td>-0.2</td></tr><tr><td>Operating-related cash flows</td><td>$-3.7</td><td>$-3.0</td><td>$2.4</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td></td><td colspan="2">Amount</td><td colspan="3">Ratios</td></tr><tr><td>December 31Dollars in millions</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td><td>“WellCapitalized”Requirements</td></tr><tr><td colspan="2">Risk-based capital</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td colspan="2">Common equity Tier 1</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>PNC</td><td>$31,799</td><td>$31,493</td><td>10.6%</td><td>10.6%</td><td>N/A</td></tr><tr><td>PNC Bank</td><td>$27,896</td><td>$27,484</td><td>9.7%</td><td>9.7%</td><td>6.5%</td></tr><tr><td>Tier 1</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>PNC</td><td>$36,101</td><td>$35,522</td><td>12.0%</td><td>12.0%</td><td>6.0%</td></tr><tr><td>PNC Bank</td><td>$29,495</td><td>$29,425</td><td>10.2%</td><td>10.4%</td><td>8.0%</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>PNC</td><td>$43,016</td><td>$43,260</td><td>14.3%</td><td>14.6%</td><td>10.0%</td></tr><tr><td>PNC Bank</td><td>$35,842</td><td>$36,482</td><td>12.4%</td><td>12.9%</td><td>10.0%</td></tr><tr><td>Leverage</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>PNC</td><td>$36,101</td><td>$35,522</td><td>10.1%</td><td>10.1%</td><td>N/A</td></tr><tr><td>PNC Bank</td><td>$29,495</td><td>$29,425</td><td>8.6%</td><td>8.7%</td><td>5.0%</td></tr></table>

Question: If the Amount for Risk-based capital Tier 1: PNC on December 31 develops with the same growth rate in 2016, what will it reach in 2017? (in million)
Answer: 36689.4
Reasoning program: subtract(36101,35522), divide(#0,35522), add(1,#1), multiply(36101,#2)