The impacts of reinsurance on our reserve for claims and claims expense as of December 31 are summarized in the following table, net of allowances we have established for uncollectible amounts.
## Table 0 ##
Reinsurance recoverables include an estimate of the amount of property-liability insurance claims and claims expense reserves that may be ceded under the terms of the reinsurance agreements, including incurred but not reported unpaid losses.
We calculate our ceded reinsurance estimate based on the terms of each applicable reinsurance agreement, including an estimate of how IBNR losses will ultimately be ceded under the agreement.
We also consider other limitations and coverage exclusions under our reinsurance agreements.
Accordingly, our estimate of reinsurance recoverables is subject to similar risks and uncertainties as our estimate of reserve for property-liability claims and claims expense.
We believe the recoverables are appropriately established; however, as our underlying reserves continue to develop, the amount ultimately recoverable may vary from amounts currently recorded.
We regularly evaluate the reinsurers and the respective amounts recoverable, and a provision for uncollectible reinsurance is recorded if needed.
The establishment of reinsurance recoverables and the related allowance for uncollectible reinsurance is also an inherently uncertain process involving estimates.
Changes in estimates could result in additional changes to the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The allowance for uncollectible reinsurance relates to Discontinued Lines and Coverages reinsurance recoverables and was $142 million as of both December 31, 2010 and 2009.
This amount represents 17.6% and 16.2% of the related reinsurance recoverable balances as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
The allowance is based upon our ongoing review of amounts outstanding, length of collection periods, changes in reinsurer credit standing, and other relevant factors.
In addition, in the ordinary course of business, we may become involved in coverage disputes with certain of our reinsurers which may ultimately result in lawsuits and arbitrations brought by or against such reinsurers to determine the parties’ rights and obligations under the various reinsurance agreements.
We employ dedicated specialists to manage reinsurance collections and disputes.
We also consider recent developments in commutation activity between reinsurers and cedants, and recent trends in arbitration and litigation outcomes in disputes between cedants and reinsurers in seeking to maximize our reinsurance recoveries.
Adverse developments in the insurance industry have led to a decline in the financial strength of some of our reinsurance carriers, causing amounts recoverable from them and future claims ceded to them to be considered a higher risk.
There has also been consolidation activity in the industry, which causes reinsurance risk across the industry to be concentrated among fewer companies.
In addition, over the last several years the industry has increasingly segregated asbestos, environmental, and other discontinued lines exposures into separate legal entities with dedicated capital.
Regulatory bodies in certain cases have supported these actions.
We are unable to determine the impact, if any, that these developments will have on the collectability of reinsurance recoverables in the future.
Part I Item 1 Entergy Corporation, Utility operating companies, and System Energy Property Nuclear Generating Stations Entergy Wholesale Commodities includes the ownership of the following nuclear power plants:
## Table 1 ##
(a) In October 2015, Entergy determined that it would close the Pilgrim plant no later than June 1, 2019, as discussed above.
(b) In January 2017, Entergy announced that it reached a settlement with New York State to shut down Indian Point 2 by April 30, 2020 and Indian Point 3 by April 30, 2021, and resolve all New York State-initiated legal challenges to Indian Point’s operating license renewal.
See below for discussion of Indian Point 2 and Indian Point 3 entering their “period of extended operation” after expiration of the plants’ initial license terms under “timely renewal.
” (c) On December 29, 2014, the Vermont Yankee plant ceased power production.
In November 2016, Entergy entered into an agreement to sell 100% of the membership interest in Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, to NorthStar.
Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee is the owner of the Vermont Yankee plant.
(d) In December 2016, Entergy announced that it had reached an agreement with Consumers Energy to terminate the existing PPA for the Palisades plant in 2018.
Separately, and assuming regulatory approvals are obtained for the PPA termination agreement, Entergy intended to shut down the Palisades nuclear power plant permanently on October 1, 2018, after refueling in the spring of 2017 and operating through the end of that fuel cycle.
In September 2017, as a result of the Michigan Public Service Commission’s order, Entergy and Consumers Energy agreed to terminate the PPA amendment agreement.
Entergy intends to shut down the Palisades nuclear power plant permanently on May 31, 2022.
In October 2015, Entergy determined that it would close the FitzPatrick plant at the end of the fuel cycle, in January 2017, but in August 2016, Entergy entered into an agreement to sell the FitzPatrick plant to Exelon, and the sale closed in March 2017.
Entergy Wholesale Commodities also includes the ownership of two non-operating nuclear facilities, Big Rock Point in Michigan and Indian Point 1 in New York that were acquired when Entergy purchased the Palisades and Indian Point 2 nuclear plants, respectively. ?
?These facilities are in various stages of the decommissioning process.
In April 2007, Entergy submitted to the NRC a joint application to renew the operating licenses for Indian Point 2 and Indian Point 3 for an additional 20 years.
The original expiration dates of the NRC operating licenses for Indian Point 2 and Indian Point 3 were September 28, 2013 and December 12, 2015, respectively.
Authorization to operate Indian Point 2 and Indian Point 3 rests on Entergy’s having timely filed a license renewal application that remains pending before the NRC.
Indian Point 2 and Indian Point 3 have now entered their “period of extended operation” after expiration of the plants’ initial license term under “timely renewal,” which is a federal statutory rule of general applicability providing for extension of a license for which a renewal application has been timely filed with the licensing agency until the license renewal process has been completed.
The license renewal application for Indian Point 2 and Indian Point 3 qualifies for timely renewal protection because it met NRC regulatory standards for timely filing.
The NRC is not expected to issue renewed licenses earlier than third quarter 2018.
For additional discussion of the license renewal applications and the settlement with New York State, see “Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Shareholder Information Independent Auditors Ernst & Young LLP 220 South Sixth Street, Ste.1400 Minneapolis, MN 55402-4509 Stock Listing Hormel Foods Corporation’s common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol HRL.
The CUSIP number is 440452100.
There are approximately 12,300 record stockholders and 89,000 stockholders whose shares are held in street name by brokerage firms and financial institutions.
Common Stock Data The high and low prices of the company’s common stock and the dividends per share declared (as adjusted for the two-forone stock split distributed on February 9, 2016) for each fiscal quarter of 2016 and 2015, respectively, are shown below:
## Table 2 ##
Transfer Agent and Registrar Wells Fargo Shareowner Services 1110 Centre Pointe Curve, Suite 101 MAC N9173-010 Mendota Heights, MN 55120 www.
shareowneronline.
com For the convenience of stockholders, a toll free number (1-877-536-3559) can be used whenever questions arise regarding changes in registered ownership, lost or stolen certificates, address changes, or other matters pertaining to the transfer of stock or stockholder records.
When requesting information, stockholders must provide their Wells Fargo account number or tax identification number, the name(s) in which their stock is registered, and their record address.
The company participates in the Direct Registration Profile Modification System (DRPMS).
Transfers or issuances of shares are now issued in book-entry form, unless you specifically request a stock certificate.
A statement will be delivered to you reflecting any transactions processed in your account.
The transfer agent makes stockholder account data available to stockholders of record via the Internet.
This service allows stockholders to view various account details, such as certificate information, dividend payment history, and/or dividend reinvestment plan records, over a secure Internet connection with the required entry of an account number and authentication ID.
Information is available 24 hours per day, 7 days a week.
If you are interested, you may use the web site www.
shareowneronline.
com and access “Sign Up Now!” to arrange for setup.
Dividend Reinvestment Plan Hormel Foods Corporation’s Dividend Reinvestment Plan, available to record stockholders, allows for full dividend reinvestment and voluntary cash purchases with brokerage commissions or other service fees paid by the Company.
Automatic debit for cash contribution is also available.
This is a convenient method to have money automatically withdrawn each month from a checking or savings account and invested in your Dividend Reinvestment Plan account.
To enroll in the plan or obtain additional information, contact Wells Fargo Shareowner Services, using the address or telephone number provided, listed previously in this section as Company transfer agent and registrar.
Enrollment in the plan is also available on the Internet at www.
shareowneronline.
com.
An optional direct dividend deposit service offers stockholders a convenient method of having quarterly dividend payments electronically deposited into their personal checking or savings account.
The dividend payment is made in the account each payment date, providing stockholders with immediate use of their money.
For information about the service and how to participate, contact Wells Fargo Shareowner Services, transfer agent.
You may also activate this feature on the Internet at www.
shareowneronline.
com.
Table of Contents Other Noninterest Income A summary of other noninterest income for 2012 , 2011 and 2010 is as follows:
## Table 3 ##
NM—Not meaningful Includes income from SVB Analytics.
(2) Represents the revaluation of foreign currency denominated financial instruments issued and held by us, primarily loans, deposits and cash (3) Includes the revaluation of foreign currency denominated financial statements of certain funds.
Included in these amounts are gains of $27 thousand , losses of $2.9 million and gains of $0.4 million in 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively, attributable to noncontrolling interests calculated based on the ownership percentages of the noncontrolling interests.
Other noninterest income was $54.4 million in 2012 , compared to $30.2 million in 2011 and $35.6 million in 2010 .
The increase in other noninterest income of $24.2 million in 2012 was due to the following: A $5.9 million increase in unused commitment fees, primarily resulting from the prospective reclassification of certain fees from interest income to noninterest income.
The comparable amount of these fees included in interest income in 2011 was $5.2 million.  ?
Gains of $4.2 million on the sale of certain assets related to our equity management services business in the second quarter of 2012.
The sale of these assets was also the primary driver for the decrease of $1.8 million in service-based fee income.  ?
Currency revaluation losses of $16 thousand in 2012 , compared to losses of $4.3 million in 2011 .
The losses of $4.3 million in 2011 were primarily due to the strengthening of the U. S.  Dollar against the Indian Rupee.  ?
Gains on the revaluation of foreign currency instruments of $1.7 million in 2012, compared to losses of $2.1 million in 2011.
The revaluation gains were primarily due to the weakening of the U. S.  Dollar against the Euro and Pound Sterling.
The decrease of $5.5 million in 2011 was primarily due to currency revaluation losses of $4.3 million in 2011, compared to a gain of $1.0 million in 2010.
These losses were primarily due to the strengthening of the U. S.  dollar against the Indian Rupee.
Additionally, we had losses on revaluation of foreign currency instruments of $2.1 million in 2011, compared to $0.4 million in 2010.
These losses were primarily due to the strengthening of the U. S.  dollar against the Euro, and were partially offset by gains of $2.0 million from our internal forward exchange forward contracts that are included in the line item “Gains on derivative instruments, net” as part of noninterest income (as discussed above).

Tables referenced above, in order (Table 0 first):
<table><tr><td> ($ in millions)    </td><td colspan="2"> Reserve for property-liability insurance claims and claims expense</td><td colspan="2"> Reinsurance recoverables, net</td></tr><tr><td> </td><td> 2010</td><td> 2009</td><td> 2010</td><td> 2009</td></tr><tr><td>Industry pools and facilities</td><td>$1,990</td><td>$2,000</td><td>$1,419</td><td>$1,408</td></tr><tr><td>Asbestos and environmental</td><td>1,903</td><td>2,027</td><td>628</td><td>683</td></tr><tr><td>Other including allowance for future uncollectible reinsurance recoverables</td><td>15,575</td><td>15,140</td><td>105</td><td>121</td></tr><tr><td>Total Property-Liability</td><td>$19,468</td><td>$19,167</td><td>$2,152</td><td>$2,212</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td>Power Plant</td><td>Market</td><td>In Service Year</td><td>Acquired</td><td>Location</td><td>Capacity - Reactor Type</td><td>License Expiration Date</td></tr><tr><td>Pilgrim (a)</td><td>ISO-NE</td><td>1972</td><td>July 1999</td><td>Plymouth, MA</td><td>688 MW - Boiling Water</td><td>2032 (a)</td></tr><tr><td>Indian Point 3 (b)</td><td>NYISO</td><td>1976</td><td>Nov. 2000</td><td>Buchanan, NY</td><td>1,041 MW - Pressurized Water</td><td>2015 (b)</td></tr><tr><td>Indian Point 2 (b)</td><td>NYISO</td><td>1974</td><td>Sept. 2001</td><td>Buchanan, NY</td><td>1,028 MW - Pressurized Water</td><td>2013 (b)</td></tr><tr><td>Vermont Yankee (c)</td><td>IS0-NE</td><td>1972</td><td>July 2002</td><td>Vernon, VT</td><td>605 MW - Boiling Water</td><td>2032 (c)</td></tr><tr><td>Palisades (d)</td><td>MISO</td><td>1971</td><td>Apr. 2007</td><td>Covert, MI</td><td>811 MW - Pressurized Water</td><td>2031 (d)</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td> 2016</td><td> High</td><td> Low</td><td> Dividend</td></tr><tr><td>First Quarter</td><td>$40.390</td><td>$32.920</td><td>$0.145</td></tr><tr><td>Second Quarter</td><td>45.720</td><td>37.490</td><td>0.145</td></tr><tr><td>Third Quarter</td><td>40.535</td><td>33.700</td><td>0.145</td></tr><tr><td>Fourth Quarter</td><td>40.000</td><td>35.870</td><td>0.145</td></tr><tr><td> 2015</td><td> High</td><td> Low</td><td> Dividend</td></tr><tr><td>First Quarter</td><td>$27.700</td><td>$25.030</td><td>$0.125</td></tr><tr><td>Second Quarter</td><td>29.490</td><td>25.065</td><td>0.125</td></tr><tr><td>Third Quarter</td><td>29.680</td><td>27.075</td><td>0.125</td></tr><tr><td>Fourth Quarter</td><td>34.483</td><td>28.443</td><td>0.125</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td></td><td colspan="5">Year ended December 31,</td></tr><tr><td>(Dollars in thousands)</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>% Change 2012/2011</td><td>2010</td><td>% Change 2011/2010</td></tr><tr><td>Unused commitment fees</td><td>$13,006</td><td>$7,095</td><td>83.3%</td><td>$6,833</td><td>3.8%</td></tr><tr><td>Fund management fees</td><td>11,057</td><td>10,730</td><td>3.0</td><td>10,753</td><td>-0.2</td></tr><tr><td>Service-based fee income -1</td><td>7,937</td><td>9,717</td><td>-18.3</td><td>8,840</td><td>9.9</td></tr><tr><td>Net gains on the sale of certain assets related to our equity management services business</td><td>4,243</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Loan syndication fees</td><td>3,896</td><td>1,020</td><td>NM</td><td>1,775</td><td>-42.5</td></tr><tr><td>Gains (losses) on revaluation of foreign currency instruments (2)</td><td>1,677</td><td>-2,096</td><td>-180.0</td><td>-374</td><td>NM</td></tr><tr><td>Currency revaluation (losses) gains (3)</td><td>-16</td><td>-4,275</td><td>-99.6</td><td>959</td><td>NM</td></tr><tr><td>Other</td><td>12,601</td><td>7,964</td><td>58.2</td><td>6,856</td><td>16.2</td></tr><tr><td>Total other noninterest income</td><td>$54,401</td><td>$30,155</td><td>80.4</td><td>$35,642</td><td>-15.4</td></tr></table>

Question: What was the average of the Loan syndication fees in the years where Unused commitment fees is positive? (in thousand)
Answer: 2458
Reasoning program: add(3896,1020), divide(#0,const_2)