Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Notes to Financial Statements 137 computed on a rolling 12 month basis.
As of December 31, 2008, Entergy Louisiana was in compliance with these provisions.
As of December 31, 2008, Entergy Louisiana had future minimum lease payments (reflecting an overall implicit rate of 7.45%) in connection with the Waterford 3 sale and leaseback transactions, which are recorded as long-term debt, as follows:
## Table 0 ##
Grand Gulf Lease Obligations In December 1988, in two separate but substantially identical transactions, System Energy sold and leased back undivided ownership interests in Grand Gulf for the aggregate sum of $500 million.
The interests represent approximately 11.5% of Grand Gulf.
The leases expire in 2015.
Under certain circumstances, System Entergy may repurchase the leased interests prior to the end of the term of the leases.
At the end of the lease terms, System Energy has the option to repurchase the leased interests in Grand Gulf at fair market value or to renew the leases for either fair market value or, under certain conditions, a fixed rate.
In May 2004, System Energy caused the Grand Gulf lessors to refinance the outstanding bonds that they had issued to finance the purchase of their undivided interest in Grand Gulf.
The refinancing is at a lower interest rate, and System Energy's lease payments have been reduced to reflect the lower interest costs.
System Energy is required to report the sale-leaseback as a financing transaction in its financial statements.
For financial reporting purposes, System Energy expenses the interest portion of the lease obligation and the plant depreciation.
However, operating revenues include the recovery of the lease payments because the transactions are accounted for as a sale and leaseback for ratemaking purposes.
Consistent with a recommendation contained in a FERC audit report, System Energy initially recorded as a net regulatory asset the difference between the recovery of the lease payments and the amounts expensed for interest and depreciation and continues to record this difference as a regulatory asset or liability on an ongoing basis, resulting in a zero net balance for the regulatory asset at the end of the lease term.
The amount of this net regulatory asset was $19.2 million and $36.6 million as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
The Company had the following active stock option plans as of December 31, 2013: ?
The Coca-Cola Company 1999 Stock Option Plan (the ‘‘1999 Option Plan’’) was approved by shareowners in April 1999.
Under the 1999 Option Plan, a maximum of 240 million shares of our common stock was approved to be issued or transferred, through the grant of stock options, to certain officers and employees.  ?
The Coca-Cola Company 2002 Stock Option Plan (the ‘‘2002 Option Plan’’) was approved by shareowners in April 2002.
An amendment to the 2002 Option Plan which permitted the issuance of stock appreciation rights was approved by shareowners in April 2003.
Under the 2002 Option Plan, a maximum of 240 million shares of our common stock was approved to be issued or transferred, through the grant of stock options or stock appreciation rights, to certain officers and employees.
No stock appreciation rights have been issued under the 2002 Option Plan as of December 31, 2013.  ?
The Coca-Cola Company 2008 Stock Option Plan (the ‘‘2008 Option Plan’’) was approved by shareowners in April 2008.
Under the 2008 Option Plan, a maximum of 280 million shares of our common stock was approved to be issued or transferred to certain officers and employees pursuant to stock options granted under the 2008 Option Plan.  ?
As a result of our acquisition of CCE’s former North America business, the Company assumed certain stock-based compensation plans previously sponsored by CCE.
Shares from these plans remain available for future grant to current employees who were employees of CCE or its subsidiaries prior to the acquisition or who are hired by the Company or its subsidiaries following the acquisition.
The assumed Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc.  2001 Stock Option Plan, Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc.  2004 Stock Award Plan and Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc.  2007 Incentive Award Plan previously sponsored by CCE have approximately 29 million shares available for grant after conversion of CCE common stock into our common stock.
The Company has not granted any equity awards from the assumed plans.
As of December 31, 2013, there were 84 million shares available to be granted under the 1999 Option Plan, 2002 Option Plan and 2008 Option Plan.
Options to purchase common stock under all of these plans have generally been granted at the fair market value of the Company’s stock at the date of grant.
Stock option activity for all stock option plans for the year ended December 31, 2013, was as follows:
## Table 1 ##
1 Includes 3 million stock option replacement awards in connection with our acquisition of CCE’s former North America business in 2010.
These options had a weighted-average exercise price of $18.02, and generally vest over 3 years and expire 10 years from the original date of grant.
The total intrinsic value of the options exercised was $815 million, $780 million and $631 million in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
The total shares exercised were 53 million, 61 million and 65 million in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
Restricted Stock Award Plans Under The Coca-Cola Company 1989 Restricted Stock Award Plan and The Coca-Cola Company 1983 Restricted Stock Award Plan (the ‘‘Restricted Stock Award Plans’’), 80 million and 48 million shares of restricted common stock, respectively, were originally available to be granted to certain officers and key employees of our Company.
As of December 31, 2013, 25 million shares remain available for grant under the Restricted Stock Award Plans.
The Company issues restricted stock to employees as a result of performance share unit awards, time-based awards and performance-based awards.
For awards prior to January 1, 2008, under the 1983 Restricted Stock Award Plan, participants are reimbursed by our Company for income taxes imposed on the award, but not for taxes generated by the reimbursement payment.
The 1983 Restricted Stock Award Plan has been amended to eliminate this tax reimbursement for awards after January 1, 2008.
The shares are subject to certain transfer restrictions and may be forfeited if a participant leaves our Company for reasons other than retirement, disability or death, absent a change in control of our Company.
Unit case volume for Bottling Investments increased 10 percent.
The group had growth in key markets where we own or otherwise consolidate bottling operations, including unit case volume growth of 4 percent in China, 16 percent in India, 5 percent in the Philippines and 1 percent in Germany.
The Company’s consolidated bottling operations accounted for 34 percent, 65 percent, 100 percent and 100 percent of the unit case volume in China, India, the Philippines and Germany, respectively.
The group’s volume growth included a benefit of 3 percentage points attributable to the acquisition of bottling operations in Vietnam, Cambodia and Guatemala during the year ended December 31, 2012.
Concentrate Sales Volume In 2013, concentrate sales volume and unit case volume both grew 2 percent compared to 2012.
Likewise, in 2012, concentrate sales volume and unit case volume both grew 4 percent compared to 2011.
The differences between concentrate sales volume and unit case volume growth rates for individual operating segments in 2013 and 2012 were primarily due to the timing of concentrate shipments and the impact of unit case volume from certain joint ventures in which the Company has an equity interest, but to which the Company does not sell concentrates, syrups, beverage bases or powders.
Analysis of Consolidated Statements of Income
## Table 2 ##
* Calculation is not meaningful.1 Calculated based on net income attributable to shareowners of The Coca-Cola Company
The favorable geographic mix was primarily due to many of our emerging markets recovering from the global recession at a quicker pace than our developed markets.
Although this shift in geographic mix has a negative impact on net operating revenues, it generally has a favorable impact on our gross profit margin due to the correlated impact it has on our product mix.
The product mix in the majority of our emerging and developing markets is more heavily skewed toward our sparkling beverage products, which generally yield a higher gross profit margin compared to our still beverages and finished products.
Refer to the heading ‘‘Net Operating Revenues’’ above.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses The following table sets forth the significant components of selling, general and administrative expenses (in millions):

Tables referenced above, in order (Table 0 first):
<table><tr><td></td><td>Amount (In Thousands)</td></tr><tr><td>2009</td><td>$32,452</td></tr><tr><td>2010</td><td>35,138</td></tr><tr><td>2011</td><td>50,421</td></tr><tr><td>2012</td><td>39,067</td></tr><tr><td>2013</td><td>26,301</td></tr><tr><td>Years thereafter</td><td>137,858</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>321,237</td></tr><tr><td>Less: Amount representing interest</td><td>73,512</td></tr><tr><td>Present value of net minimum lease payments</td><td>$247,725</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td></td><td>Shares (In millions)</td><td>Weighted-AverageExercise Price</td><td>Weighted-AverageRemainingContractual Life</td><td>AggregateIntrinsic Value(In millions)</td></tr><tr><td>Outstanding on January 1, 2013</td><td>309</td><td>$27.27</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Granted</td><td>56</td><td>37.68</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Exercised</td><td>-53</td><td>25.02</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Forfeited/expired</td><td>-7</td><td>34.34</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Outstanding on December 31, 2013<sup>1</sup></td><td>305</td><td>$29.42</td><td>5.82 years</td><td>$3,636</td></tr><tr><td>Expected to vest at December 31, 2013</td><td>302</td><td>$29.33</td><td>5.78 years</td><td>$3,614</td></tr><tr><td>Exercisable on December 31, 2013</td><td>187</td><td>$25.87</td><td>4.25 years</td><td>$2,887</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td colspan="2">Percent Change</td></tr><tr><td>Year Ended December 31,</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td><td>2011</td><td>2013 vs. 2012</td><td>2012 vs. 2011</td></tr><tr><td>(In millions except percentages and per share data)</td><td></td><td colspan="2"></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>NET OPERATING REVENUES</td><td>$46,854</td><td>$48,017</td><td>$46,542</td><td>-2%</td><td>3%</td></tr><tr><td>Cost of goods sold</td><td>18,421</td><td>19,053</td><td>18,215</td><td>-3</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>GROSS PROFIT</td><td>28,433</td><td>28,964</td><td>28,327</td><td>-2</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>GROSS PROFIT MARGIN</td><td>60.7%</td><td>60.3%</td><td>60.9%</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Selling, general and administrative expenses</td><td>17,310</td><td>17,738</td><td>17,422</td><td>-2</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>Other operating charges</td><td>895</td><td>447</td><td>732</td><td>*</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>OPERATING INCOME</td><td>10,228</td><td>10,779</td><td>10,173</td><td>-5</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>OPERATING MARGIN</td><td>21.8%</td><td>22.4%</td><td>21.9%</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Interest income</td><td>534</td><td>471</td><td>483</td><td>13</td><td>-2</td></tr><tr><td>Interest expense</td><td>463</td><td>397</td><td>417</td><td>17</td><td>-5</td></tr><tr><td>Equity income (loss) — net</td><td>602</td><td>819</td><td>690</td><td>-27</td><td>19</td></tr><tr><td>Other income (loss) — net</td><td>576</td><td>137</td><td>529</td><td>*</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES</td><td>11,477</td><td>11,809</td><td>11,458</td><td>-3</td><td>3</td></tr><tr><td>Income taxes</td><td>2,851</td><td>2,723</td><td>2,812</td><td>5</td><td>-3</td></tr><tr><td>Effective tax rate</td><td>24.8%</td><td>23.1%</td><td>24.5%</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>CONSOLIDATED NET INCOME</td><td>8,626</td><td>9,086</td><td>8,646</td><td>-5</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests</td><td>42</td><td>67</td><td>62</td><td>-38</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO SHAREOWNERS OFTHE COCA-COLA COMPANY</td><td>$8,584</td><td>$9,019</td><td>$8,584</td><td>-5%</td><td>5%</td></tr><tr><td>BASIC NET INCOME PER SHARE<sup>1</sup></td><td>$1.94</td><td>$2.00</td><td>$1.88</td><td>-3%</td><td>6%</td></tr><tr><td>DILUTED NET INCOME PER SHARE<sup>1</sup></td><td>$1.90</td><td>$1.97</td><td>$1.85</td><td>-4%</td><td>6%</td></tr></table>

Question: In the year with highest CONSOLIDATED NET INCOME, what's the growing rate of Interest income?
Answer: -0.02484
Reasoning program: subtract(471,483), divide(#0,483)