Revisions to the Earnings-per-Share Calculation In June 2008, the FASB issued FSP EITF 03-6-1, “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions are Participating Securities” (now incorporated into ASC 260-10-45-59A, Earnings Per Share: Participating Securities and the Two-Class Method).
Under the FSP, unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends are considered to be a separate class of common stock and included in the EPS calculation using the “two-class method.
” Citigroup’s restricted and deferred share awards meet the definition of a participating security.
In accordance with the FSP, restricted and deferred shares are now included as a separate class of common stock in the basic and diluted EPS calculation.
The following table shows the effect of adopting the FSP on Citigroup’s basic and diluted EPS:
## Table 0 ##
(1) Diluted EPS is the same as Basic EPS in 2009 and 2008 due to the net loss available to common shareholders.
Using actual diluted shares would result in anti-dilution.
N/A Not applicable Fair Value Disclosures About Pension Plan Assets In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 132(R)-1, Employers’ Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets (now incorporated into ASC 715-20-50, Compensation and Benefits— Disclosure).
This FSP requires that more detailed information about plan assets be disclosed on an annual basis.
Citigroup is required to separate plan assets into the three fair value hierarchy levels and provide a roll-forward of the changes in fair value of plan assets classified as Level 3.
The disclosures about plan assets required by this FSP are effective for fiscal years ending after December15, 2009, but have no effect on the Consolidated Balance Sheet or Statement of Income.
Additional Disclosures for Derivative Instruments In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No.161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an Amendment to SFAS 133 (now incorporated into ASC 815-10-50, Derivatives and Hedging— Disclosure).
The Standard requires enhanced disclosures about derivative instruments and hedged items that are accounted for under ASC 815 related interpretations.
The Standard is effective for all of the Company’s interim and annual financial statements beginning with the first quarter of 2009.
The Standard expands the disclosure requirements for derivatives and hedged items and has no impact on how Citigroup accounts for these instruments.
Determining Whether an Instrument (or Embedded Feature) Is Indexed to an Entity’s Own Stock Derivative contracts on a company’s own stock may be accounted for as equity instruments, rather than as assets and liabilities, only if they are both indexed solely to the company’s stock and settleable in shares.
In June 2008, the FASB ratified the consensus reached by the EITF on Issue 07-5, “Determining Whether an Instrument (or Embedded Feature) Is Indexed to an Entity’s Own Stock” (Issue 07-5) (now ASC 815-40- 15-5, Derivatives and Hedging: Evaluating Whether an Instrument is Considered Indexed to an Entity’s Own Stock).
An instrument (or embedded feature) would not be considered indexed to an entity’s own stock if its settlement amount is affected by variables other than those used to determine the fair value of a “plain vanilla” option or forward contract on equity shares, or if the instrument contains a feature (such as a leverage factor) that increases exposure to those variables.
An equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded feature) would not be considered indexed to the entity’s own stock if the strike price is denominated in a currency other than the issuer’s functional currency.
This issue was effective for Citigroup on January1, 2009 and did not have a material impact.
Equity Method Investment Accounting Considerations In November 2008, the FASB ratified the consensus reached by the EITF on Issue 08-6, “Equity Method Investment Accounting Considerations” (Issue 08-6) (now ASC 323-10, Investments—Equity Method and Joint Ventures).
An entity shall measure its equity method investment initially at cost.
Any other-than-temporary impairment of an equity method investment should be recognized in accordance with Opinion 18.
An equity method investor shall not separately test an investee’s underlying assets for impairment.
Share issuance by an investee shall be accounted for as if the equity method investor had sold a proportionate share of its investment, with a gain or loss recognized in earnings.
This issue was effective for Citigroup on January1, 2009, and did not have a material impact.
Credit Risk Mitigation As part of its overall risk management activities, Citigroup uses credit derivatives and other risk mitigants to hedge portions of the credit risk in its corporate credit portfolio, in addition to outright asset sales.
The results of the mark-to market and any realized gains or losses on credit derivatives are reflected primarily in Other revenue on the Consolidated Statement of Income.
At December 31, 2015, September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, $34.5 billion, $33.0 billion and $27.6 billion, respectively, of the corporate credit portfolio was economically hedged.
Citigroup鈥檚 expected loss model used in the calculation of its loan loss reserve does not include the favorable impact of credit derivatives and other mitigants that are marked to market.
In addition, the reported amounts of direct outstandings and unfunded lending commitments in the tables above do not reflect the impact of these hedging transactions.
The credit protection was economically hedging underlying corporate credit portfolio exposures with the following risk rating distribution: Rating of Hedged Exposure
## Table 1 ##
The credit protection was economically hedging underlying corporate credit portfolio exposures with the following industry distribution: Industry of Hedged Exposure
## Table 2 ##
Loan Maturities and Fixed/Variable Pricing CorporateLoans
## Table 3 ##
Based on contractual terms.
Repricing characteristics may effectively be modified from time to time using derivative contracts.
See Note 23 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
ITEM 1B.
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS None.
ITEM 2.
PROPERTIES A summary of our significant locations at December 31, 2015 is shown in the following table.
Square footage amounts are net of space that has been sublet or is part of a facility restructuring.

Tables referenced above, in order (Table 0 first):
<table><tr><td></td><td>2010</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>Basic earnings per share</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>As reported</td><td>N/A</td><td>N/A</td><td>$-5.59</td></tr><tr><td>Two-class method</td><td>$0.36</td><td>$-0.80</td><td>-5.63</td></tr><tr><td>Diluted earnings per share-1</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>As reported</td><td>N/A</td><td>N/A</td><td>-5.59</td></tr><tr><td>Two-class method</td><td>0.35</td><td>-0.80</td><td>-5.63</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td></td><td>December 31,2015</td><td>September 30,2015</td><td>December 31,2014</td></tr><tr><td>Transportation and industrial</td><td>28%</td><td>28%</td><td>30%</td></tr><tr><td>Consumer retail and health</td><td>17</td><td>15</td><td>11</td></tr><tr><td>Technology, media and telecom</td><td>16</td><td>15</td><td>15</td></tr><tr><td>Energy</td><td>13</td><td>13</td><td>10</td></tr><tr><td>Power, chemicals, commodities and metals and mining</td><td>12</td><td>13</td><td>15</td></tr><tr><td>Public sector</td><td>4</td><td>4</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>Insurance and special purpose entities</td><td>5</td><td>6</td><td>4</td></tr><tr><td>Banks/broker-dealers</td><td>4</td><td>4</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>Other industries</td><td>1</td><td>2</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>100%</td><td>100%</td><td>100%</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td></td><td>December 31,2015</td><td>September 30,2015</td><td>December 31,2014</td></tr><tr><td>AAA/AA/A</td><td>21%</td><td>24%</td><td>24%</td></tr><tr><td>BBB</td><td>48</td><td>44</td><td>42</td></tr><tr><td>BB/B</td><td>27</td><td>28</td><td>28</td></tr><tr><td>CCC or below</td><td>4</td><td>4</td><td>6</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>100%</td><td>100%</td><td>100%</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td>In millions of dollars at December 31, 2015</td><td>Duewithin1 year</td><td>Over 1yearbutwithin5 years</td><td>Over 5years</td><td>Total</td></tr><tr><td>Corporate loan</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>In U.S. offices</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Commercial and industrial loans</td><td>$19,921</td><td>$13,522</td><td>$7,704</td><td>$41,147</td></tr><tr><td>Financial institutions</td><td>17,620</td><td>11,961</td><td>6,815</td><td>36,396</td></tr><tr><td>Mortgage and real estate</td><td>18,187</td><td>12,345</td><td>7,033</td><td>37,565</td></tr><tr><td>Lease financing</td><td>862</td><td>585</td><td>333</td><td>1,780</td></tr><tr><td>Installment, revolving credit, other</td><td>16,157</td><td>10,968</td><td>6,249</td><td>33,374</td></tr><tr><td>In offices outside the U.S.</td><td>90,365</td><td>34,440</td><td>13,427</td><td>138,232</td></tr><tr><td>Total corporate loans</td><td>$163,112</td><td>$83,821</td><td>$41,561</td><td>$288,494</td></tr><tr><td>Fixed/variablepricing of corporateloans withmaturities due afterone year<sup>-1</sup></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Loans at fixedinterest rates</td><td></td><td>$9,858</td><td>$11,192</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Loans at floating oradjustable interestrates</td><td></td><td>73,963</td><td>30,369</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td></td><td>$83,821</td><td>$41,561</td><td></td></tr></table>

Question: What was the average ratio for Technology, media and telecom for December 31,2015, September 30,2015, and December 31,2014 ?
Answer: 0.15333
Reasoning program: add(16,15), add(#0,15), divide(#1,const_3), divide(#2,const_100)