2016 vs.  2015 Sales of $498.8 increased $212.1, or 74%.
The increase in sales was driven by the Jazan project which more than offset the decrease in small equipment and other air separation unit sales.
In 2016, we recognized approximately $300 of sales related to the Jazan project.
Operating loss of $21.3 decreased 59%, or $30.3, primarily from income on the Jazan project and benefits from cost reduction actions, partially offset by lower other sale of equipment project activity and a gain associated with the cancellation of a sale of equipment contract that was recorded in fiscal year 2015.
Corporate and other The Corporate and other segment includes two ongoing global businesses (our LNG equipment business and our liquid helium and liquid hydrogen transport and storage container businesses), and corporate support functions that benefit all the segments.
Corporate and other also includes income and expense that is not directly associated with the business segments, including foreign exchange gains and losses and stranded costs.
Stranded costs result from functional support previously provided to the two divisions comprising the former Materials Technologies segment.
The majority of these costs are reimbursed to Air Products pursuant to short-term transition services agreements under which Air Products provides transition services to Versum for EMD and to Evonik for PMD.
The reimbursement for costs in support of the transition services has been reflected on the consolidated income statements within "Other income (expense), net. "
## Table 0 ##
2017 vs.  2016 Sales of $82.6 decreased $153.4, primarily due to lower LNG project activity.
We expect continued weakness in new LNG project orders due to continued oversupply of LNG in the market.
Operating loss of $170.6 increased $83.0 due to lower LNG activity, partially offset by productivity improvements and income from transition service agreements with Versum and Evonik.2016 vs.  2015 Sales of $236.0 decreased $79.4, or 25%, primarily due to lower LNG sale of equipment activity.
Operating loss of $87.6 increased 1%, or $1.1, due to lower LNG activity, mostly offset by benefits from our recent cost reduction actions and lower foreign exchange losses.
RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES (Millions of dollars unless otherwise indicated, except for per share data) The Company has presented certain financial measures on a non-GAAP (“adjusted”) basis and has provided a reconciliation to the most directly comparable financial measure calculated in accordance with GAAP.
These financial measures are not meant to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for the most directly comparable financial measure calculated in accordance with GAAP.
The Company believes these non-GAAP measures provide investors, potential investors, securities analysts, and others with useful supplemental information to evaluate the performance of the business because such measures, when viewed together with our financial results computed in accordance with GAAP, provide a more complete understanding of the factors and trends affecting our historical financial performance and projected future results.
In many cases, our non-GAAP measures are determined by adjusting the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure to exclude certain disclosed items (“non-GAAP adjustments”) that we believe are not representative of the underlying business performance.
For example, Air Products has executed its strategic plan to restructure the Company to focus on its core Industrial Gases business.
This resulted in significant cost reduction and asset actions that we believe are important for investors to understand separately from the performance of the underlying business.
The reader should be aware that we may incur similar expenses in the future.
The tax impact of our nonGAAP adjustments reflects the expected current and deferred income tax expense impact of the transactions and is impacted primarily by the statutory tax rate of the various relevant jurisdictions and the taxability of the adjustments in those jurisdictions.
Investors should also consider the limitations associated with these non-GAAP measures, including the potential lack of comparability of these measures from one company to another.
iShares ETFs iShares is the leading ETF provider in the world, with $1.8 trillion of AUM at December 31, 2017 and was the top asset gatherer globally in 20171 with record net inflows of $245.3 billion resulting in an organic growth rate of 19%.
Equity net inflows of $174.4 billion were driven by flows into Core funds and into products with U. S.  and broad developed market equity exposures.
Record fixed income net inflows of $67.5 billion were diversified across exposures and product lines, led by flows into Core, corporate and treasury bond funds.
iShares ETF multi-asset and alternative funds contributed a combined $3.5 billion of net inflows, primarily into commodities funds.
iShares ETFs represented 30% of long-term AUM at December 31, 2017 and 40% of long-term base fees for 2017.
Component changes in iShares ETFs AUM for 2017 are presented below.
## Table 1 ##
(1) Amounts include commodity iShares ETFs.
Our broad iShares ETF product range offers investors a precise, transparent and efficient way to gain exposure to a full range of asset classes and global markets that have been difficult for many investors to access, as well as the liquidity required to make adjustments to their exposures quickly and cost-efficiently.  ?
U. S.  iShares ETF AUM ended 2017 at $1.3 trillion with $201.3 billion of net inflows driven by strong demand for Core funds and U. S.  and broad developed market equities as well as a diverse range of fixed income products.2 ?
International iShares ETF AUM ended 2017 at $424.7 billion with net inflows of $44.1 billion led by equity net inflows of $29.0 billion, which reflected strong flows into our international Core funds in Canada and Europe.
Institutional BlackRock serves institutional investors on six continents in sub-categories including: pensions, endowments and foundations, official institutions, and financial institutions; institutional AUM is diversified across product and region.
Component changes in institutional long-term AUM for 2017 are presented below.
## Table 2 ##
(1) Amount represents AUM acquired in the First Reserve Transaction.1 Source: BlackRock; Bloomberg 2 Regional iShares ETF amounts based on jurisdiction of product, not underlying client.
number of these indemnities is not estimable.
At December 31, 2007, we have an $88 million liability in connection with indemnities related to the sale of certain subsidiaries reflected on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
We provide guarantees and surety bonds on behalf of certain non-consolidated entities, improving their ability to transact business.
In addition, we have provided financial guarantees to certain property owners in connection with the Bay Harbor remediation effort.
We monitor these obligations and believe it is unlikely that we will incur any material losses associated with these guarantees.
For additional details on these and other guarantee arrangements, see Note 3, Contingencies, “Other Contingencies — Guarantees and Indemnifications.
” Sale of Accounts Receivable: Under a revolving accounts receivable sales program, Consumers may sell up to $325 million of certain accounts receivable.
This program provides less expensive funding that unsecured debt.
For additional details, see Note 4, Financings and Capitalization.
Capital Expenditures: For planning purposes, we forecast capital expenditures over a three-year period.
We review these estimates and may revise them, periodically, due to a number of factors including environmental regulations, business opportunities, market volatility, economic trends, and the ability to access capital.
The following is a summary of our estimated capital expenditures, including lease commitments, for 2008 through 2010:

Tables referenced above, in order (Table 0 first):
<table><tr><td></td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>Sales</td><td>$82.6</td><td>$236.0</td><td>$315.4</td></tr><tr><td>Operating loss</td><td>-170.6</td><td>-87.6</td><td>-86.5</td></tr><tr><td>Adjusted EBITDA</td><td>-158.4</td><td>-68.1</td><td>-66.2</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td>(in millions)</td><td>December 31,2016</td><td>Netinflows</td><td>Marketchange</td><td>FXimpact</td><td>December 31,2017</td></tr><tr><td>Equity</td><td>$951,252</td><td>$174,377</td><td>$189,472</td><td>$14,509</td><td>$1,329,610</td></tr><tr><td>Fixed income</td><td>314,707</td><td>67,451</td><td>4,497</td><td>8,597</td><td>395,252</td></tr><tr><td>Multi-asset</td><td>3,149</td><td>322</td><td>280</td><td>10</td><td>3,761</td></tr><tr><td>Alternatives<sup>-1</sup></td><td>18,771</td><td>3,192</td><td>1,478</td><td>175</td><td>23,616</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>$1,287,879</td><td>$245,342</td><td>$195,727</td><td>$23,291</td><td>$1,752,239</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td>(in millions)</td><td>December 31,2016</td><td>Net inflows (outflows)</td><td>Acquisition<sup>-1</sup></td><td>Marketchange</td><td>FXimpact</td><td>December 31,2017</td></tr><tr><td>Active:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Equity</td><td>$120,699</td><td>$-13,594</td><td>$—</td><td>$25,681</td><td>$4,399</td><td>$137,185</td></tr><tr><td>Fixed income</td><td>536,727</td><td>-654</td><td>—</td><td>22,537</td><td>11,440</td><td>570,050</td></tr><tr><td>Multi-asset</td><td>276,933</td><td>19,604</td><td>—</td><td>37,166</td><td>14,122</td><td>347,825</td></tr><tr><td>Alternatives</td><td>75,615</td><td>566</td><td>3,264</td><td>2,771</td><td>2,032</td><td>84,248</td></tr><tr><td>Active subtotal</td><td>1,009,974</td><td>5,922</td><td>3,264</td><td>88,155</td><td>31,993</td><td>1,139,308</td></tr><tr><td>Index:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Equity</td><td>1,389,004</td><td>-34,782</td><td>—</td><td>283,684</td><td>33,722</td><td>1,671,628</td></tr><tr><td>Fixed income</td><td>498,675</td><td>87,487</td><td>—</td><td>13,932</td><td>32,498</td><td>632,592</td></tr><tr><td>Multi-asset</td><td>6,928</td><td>-739</td><td>—</td><td>1,427</td><td>221</td><td>7,837</td></tr><tr><td>Alternatives</td><td>7,074</td><td>-2,882</td><td>—</td><td>294</td><td>264</td><td>4,750</td></tr><tr><td>Index subtotal</td><td>1,901,681</td><td>49,084</td><td>—</td><td>299,337</td><td>66,705</td><td>2,316,807</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>$2,911,655</td><td>$55,006</td><td>$3,264</td><td>$387,492</td><td>$98,698</td><td>$3,456,115</td></tr></table>

Question: If Multi-asset develops with the same increasing rate in 2017, what will it reach in 2018? (in million)
Answer: 4491.94
Reasoning program: subtract(3761,3149), divide(#0,3149), add(1,#1), multiply(3761,#2)