(l) Impairment of Long-Lived Assets The Company reviews its long-lived asset groups, which include intangible assets subject to amortization, which for the Company are its patents and customer relationships, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such asset groups may not be recoverable.
Recoverability of asset groups to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of long-lived assets to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by these asset groups.
If such asset groups are considered to be impaired, the impairment recognized is the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset group exceeds the fair value of the asset group.
Assets held for sale are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less estimated costs of disposal and are no longer depreciated.
(m) Foreign Currency Translation Prior to the second quarter of 2012, operations carried out in Mexico used the U. S.  Dollar as the functional currency.
Effective April 1, 2012, the Company changed the functional currency of its Mexico operations to the Mexican Peso.
The Company believes that the completion of a second plant in Mexico and growth in sales to the local Mexican market indicated a significant change in the economic facts and circumstances that justified the change in the functional currency.
The effects of the change in functional currency were not significant to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
The Company’s subsidiaries that operate outside the United States use their local currency as the functional currency.
The functional currency is translated into U. S.  Dollars for balance sheet accounts using the month end rates in effect as of the balance sheet date and average exchange rate for revenue and expense accounts for each respective period.
The translation adjustments are deferred as a separate component of stockholders’ equity, within accumulated other comprehensive income (deficit).
Gains or losses resulting from transactions denominated in foreign currencies are included in other income or expense, within the consolidated statements of operations.
(n) Earnings per Share (“EPS”) Basic net earnings per share (“EPS”) is calculated using net earnings available to common stockholders divided by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the year.
Diluted EPS is similar to basic EPS except that the weighted-average number of shares is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potentially dilutive common shares had been issued.
Dilutive common stock options are included in the diluted EPS calculation using the treasury stock method.
Common stock options and unvested restricted shares (units) that were not included in the diluted EPS computation because the price was greater than the average market price of the common shares for the periods presented were 0, 0 and 891 for 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively Computations of basic and diluted earnings per share from continuing operations are presented in the following table:
## Table 0 ##
(o) Stock-Based Compensation The Company recognizes compensation expense for all share-based payments granted based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with ASC 718-10, “Stock Compensation”.
Compensation expense is generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the awards’ estimated lives for fixed awards with ratable vesting provisions.
(p) Comprehensive Income (Loss) Comprehensive income (loss) includes foreign currency translation of assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries, effects of exchange rate changes on intercompany balances of a long-term nature and pensions.
The Company does not provide income taxes on currency translation adjustments, as earnings from foreign subsidiaries are considered to be indefinitely reinvested.
Effective January 1, 2013, the Company adopted recently issued accounting guidance that requires the Company to separately disclose, on a prospective basis, the change in each component of other comprehensive income (loss) relating to reclassification adjustments and current period other comprehensive income (loss).
As the guidance relates to presentation only, the adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
Incurred Losses and LAE.
The following table presents the incurred losses and LAE for the Insurance segment for the periods indicated.
## Table 1 ##
Incurred losses and LAE increased by 33.0% to $931.5 million in 2013 compared to $700.3 million in 2012 mainly due to increases in current year attritional losses and higher unfavorable prior year development on attritional losses in 2013 compared to 2012.
The current year attritional losses increased by $158.5 million primarily due to the impact of higher premiums earned and a higher current year attritional loss ratio on the crop book, which was impacted by a decline in corn commodity prices and lower yields in several of our key states.
The prior year development on attritional losses was primarily related to workers’ compensation, construction liability and umbrella business.
The construction liability and umbrella development related to programs that were discontinued several years ago.
Current year catastrophe losses were $2.3 million in 2013, due to Canadian floods.
The $6.7 million of current year catastrophe losses for 2012 were primarily due to Superstorm Sandy ($5.5 million).
Incurred losses and LAE decreased by 0.8% to $700.3 million in 2012 compared to $705.9 million in 2011.
This was primarily due to a decrease of $9.5 million (4.3 points) in attritional losses resulting primarily from lower prior years’ losses in 2012 resulting from development on excess casualty and California workers’ compensation reserves, as well as a shift in the mix of business towards shorter-tail lines of business.
This decrease was partially offset by a $4.2 million increase in current year catastrophe losses primarily due to Superstorm Sandy.
Segment Expenses Commission and brokerage increased by 13.7% to $133.7 million in 2013 compared to $117.6 million in 2012.
The year over year increase was primarily driven by the growth in premiums earned, partially offset by the impact of the accounting change for acquisition costs, which had the impact of increasing expenses in 2012.
Segment other underwriting expenses increased to $119.3 million in 2013 compared to $103.0 million for 2012.
These increases were primarily the result of increased premiums earned and compensation costs.
Commission and brokerage decreased by 14.6% to $117.6 million in 2012 compared to $137.7 million in 2011, driven by growth in direct distribution business, which has lower acquisition costs.
Segment other underwriting expenses increased to $103.0 million in 2012 compared to $89.5 million for the same period in 2011.
These increases are primarily the result of increased personnel benefit costs.
contract U a l o B l i G ation S The following table presents a summary of our future obligations (in?millions) under the terms of existing operating leases and other contractual cash purchase commitments at December 31, 2011.
Other purchase commitments include contractual amounts that will be due for the purchase of goods or services to be used in our operations and may be cancelable at earlier times than those indicated, under certain conditions that may involve termination fees.
Because these obligations are generally of a normal recurring nature, we expect that we will fund them from future cash flows from operations.
The information presented does not include operating expenses or capital expenditures that will be committed in the normal course of operations in 2012 and future years.
The information also excludes the $4.7?million of uncertain tax positions discussed in Note 9 to our consolidated financial statements because it is not possible to estimate the time period in which a payment might be made to the tax authorities.
## Table 2 ##
We also have outstanding commitments to fund additional contributions to investment partnerships in which we have an existing investment totaling $42.5?million at December 31, 2011.  critical acco U ntin G P olici E S The preparation of financial statements often requires the selection of specific accounting methods and policies from among several acceptable alternatives.
Further, significant estimates and judgments may be required in selecting and applying those methods and policies in the recognition of the assets and liabilities in our balance sheet, the revenues and expenses in our statement of income, and the information that is contained in our significant accounting policies and notes to consolidated financial statements.
Making these estimates and judgments requires the analysis of information concerning events that may not yet be complete and of facts and circumstances that may change over time.
Accordingly, actual amounts or future results can differ materially from those estimates that we include currently in our consolidated financial statements, significant accounting policies, and notes.
We present those significant accounting policies used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements as an integral part of those statements within this 2011 Annual Report.
In the following discussion, we highlight and explain further certain of those policies that are most critical to the preparation and understanding of our financial statements.
Other than temporary impairments of available-for-sale securities.
We generally classify our investment holdings in sponsored mutual funds and the debt securities held for investment by our savings bank subsidiary as available-for-sale.
At the end of each quarter, we mark the carrying amount of each investment holding to fair value and recognize an unrealized gain or loss as a component of comprehensive income within the statement of stockholders’ equity.
We next review each individual security position that has an unrealized loss or impairment to determine if that impairment is other than temporary.
In determining whether a mutual fund holding is other than temporarily impaired, we consider many factors, including the duration of time it has existed, the severity of the impairment, any subsequent changes in value, and our intent and ability to hold the security for a period of time sufficient for an anticipated recovery in fair value.
Subject to the other considerations noted above, with respect to duration of time, we believe a mutual fund holding with an unrealized loss that has persisted daily throughout the six months between quarter-ends is generally presumed to have an other than temporary impairment.
We may also recognize an other than temporary loss of less than six months in our statement of income if the particular circumstances of the underlying investment do not warrant our belief that a near-term recovery is possible.
An impaired debt security held by our savings bank subsidiary is considered to have an other than temporary loss that we will recognize in our statement of income if the impairment is caused by a change in credit quality that affects our ability to recover our amortized cost or if we intend to sell the security or believe that it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell the security before recovering cost.
Minor impairments of 5% or less are generally considered temporary Other than temporary impairments of equity method investments.
We evaluate our equity method investments, including our investment in UTI, for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the investment exceeds its fair value, and the decline in fair value is other than temporary.
Goodwill.
We internally conduct, manage and report our operations as one investment advisory business.
We do not have distinct operating segments or components that separately constitute a business.
Accordingly, we attribute goodwill to a single reportable business segment and reporting unit—our investment advisory business.
We evaluate the carrying amount of goodwill in our balance sheet for possible impairment on an annual basis in the third quarter of each year using a fair value approach.
Goodwill would be considered impaired whenever our historical carrying amount exceeds the fair value of our investment advisory business.
Our annual testing has demonstrated that the fair value of our investment advisory business (our market capitalization) exceeds our carrying amount (our stockholders’ equity) and, therefore, no impairment exists.
Should we reach a different conclusion in the future, additional work would be performed to ascertain the amount of the non-cash impairment charge to be recognized.
We must also perform impairment testing at other times if an event or circumstance occurs indicating that it is more likely than not that an impairment has been incurred.
The maximum future impairment of goodwill that we could incur is the amount recognized in our balance sheet, $665.7?million.
Stock options.
We recognize stock option-based compensation expense in our consolidated statement of income using a fair value based method.
Fair value methods use a valuation model for shorter-term, market-traded financial instruments to theoretically value stock option grants even though they are not available for trading and are of longer duration.
The BlackScholes option-pricing model that we use includes the input of certain variables that are dependent on future expectations, including the expected lives of our options from grant date to exercise date, the volatility of our underlying common shares in the market over that time period, and the rate of dividends that we will pay during that time.
Our estimates of these variables are made for the purpose of using the valuation model to determine an expense for each reporting period and are not subsequently adjusted.
Unlike most of our expenses, the resulting charge to earnings using a fair value based method is a non-cash charge that is never measured by, or adjusted based on, a cash outflow.
Provision for income taxes.
After compensation and related costs, our provision for income taxes on our earnings is our largest annual expense.
We operate in numerous states and countries through our various subsidiaries, and must allocate our income, expenses, and earnings under the various laws and regulations of each of these taxing jurisdictions.
Accordingly, our provision for income taxes represents our total estimate of the liability that we have incurred in doing business each year in all of our locations.
Annually, we file tax returns that represent our filing positions with each jurisdiction and settle our return liabilities.
Each jurisdiction has the right to audit those returns and may take different positions with respect to income and expense allocations and taxable earnings determinations.
From time to time, we may also provide for estimated liabilities associated with uncertain tax return filing positions that are subject to, or in the process of, being audited by various tax authorities.
Because the determination of our annual provision is subject to judgments and estimates, it is likely that actual results will vary from those recognized in our financial statements.
As a result, we recognize additions to, or reductions of, income tax expense during a reporting period that pertain to prior period provisions as our estimated liabilities are revised and actual tax returns and tax audits are settled.
We recognize any such prior period adjustment in the discrete quarterly period in which it is determined.
n E W lY i SSUED BU t not YE t a D o P t ED acco U ntin G GU i D anc E In May 2011, the FASB issued amended guidance clarifying how to measure and disclose fair value.
We do not believe the adoption of such amended guidance on January 1, 2012, will have a significant effect on our consolidated financial statements.
We have also considered all other newly issued accounting guidance that is applicable to our operations and the preparation of our consolidated statements, including that which we have not yet adopted.
We do not believe that any such guidance will have a material effect on our financial position or results of operation.

Tables referenced above, in order (Table 0 first):
<table><tr><td></td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>Earnings from continuing operations attributable to Mohawk Industries, Inc.</td><td>$531,965</td><td>366,681</td><td>250,258</td></tr><tr><td>Weighted-average common shares outstanding-basic and diluted:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Weighted-average common shares outstanding - basic</td><td>72,837</td><td>71,773</td><td>68,988</td></tr><tr><td>Add weighted-average dilutive potential common shares - options and RSU’s to purchase common shares, net</td><td>526</td><td>528</td><td>318</td></tr><tr><td>Weighted-average common shares outstanding-diluted</td><td>73,363</td><td>72,301</td><td>69,306</td></tr><tr><td>Earnings per share from continuing operations attributable to Mohawk Industries, Inc.</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Basic</td><td>$7.30</td><td>5.11</td><td>3.63</td></tr><tr><td>Diluted</td><td>$7.25</td><td>5.07</td><td>3.61</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td></td><td colspan="8">Years Ended December 31,</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>(Dollars in millions)</td><td>Current Year</td><td colspan="2">Ratio %/ Pt Change</td><td>Prior Years</td><td colspan="2">Ratio %/ Pt Change</td><td>Total Incurred</td><td colspan="2">Ratio %/ Pt Change</td></tr><tr><td>2013</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Attritional</td><td>$798.6</td><td>77.0%</td><td></td><td>$131.9</td><td>12.7%</td><td></td><td>$930.5</td><td>89.7%</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Catastrophes</td><td>2.3</td><td>0.2%</td><td></td><td>-1.3</td><td>-0.1%</td><td></td><td>1.0</td><td>0.1%</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Total segment</td><td>$800.9</td><td>77.2%</td><td></td><td>$130.6</td><td>12.6%</td><td></td><td>$931.5</td><td>89.8%</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>2012</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Attritional</td><td>$640.1</td><td>75.1%</td><td></td><td>$53.5</td><td>6.3%</td><td></td><td>$693.6</td><td>81.4%</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Catastrophes</td><td>6.7</td><td>0.8%</td><td></td><td>-</td><td>0.0%</td><td></td><td>6.7</td><td>0.8%</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Total segment</td><td>$646.8</td><td>75.9%</td><td></td><td>$53.5</td><td>6.3%</td><td></td><td>$700.3</td><td>82.2%</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>2011</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Attritional</td><td>$641.4</td><td>78.2%</td><td></td><td>$61.7</td><td>7.5%</td><td></td><td>$703.1</td><td>85.7%</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Catastrophes</td><td>2.5</td><td>0.3%</td><td></td><td>0.3</td><td>0.0%</td><td></td><td>2.8</td><td>0.3%</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Total segment</td><td>$643.9</td><td>78.5%</td><td></td><td>$62.0</td><td>7.5%</td><td></td><td>$705.9</td><td>86.0%</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Variance 2013/2012</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Attritional</td><td>$158.5</td><td>1.9</td><td>pts</td><td>$78.4</td><td>6.4</td><td>pts</td><td>$236.9</td><td>8.3</td><td>pts</td></tr><tr><td>Catastrophes</td><td>-4.4</td><td>-0.6</td><td>pts</td><td>-1.3</td><td>-0.1</td><td>pts</td><td>-5.7</td><td>-0.7</td><td>pts</td></tr><tr><td>Total segment</td><td>$154.1</td><td>1.3</td><td>pts</td><td>$77.1</td><td>6.3</td><td>pts</td><td>$231.2</td><td>7.6</td><td>pts</td></tr><tr><td>Variance 2012/2011</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Attritional</td><td>$-1.3</td><td>-3.1</td><td>pts</td><td>$-8.2</td><td>-1.2</td><td>pts</td><td>$-9.5</td><td>-4.3</td><td>pts</td></tr><tr><td>Catastrophes</td><td>4.2</td><td>0.5</td><td>pts</td><td>-0.3</td><td>-</td><td>pts</td><td>3.9</td><td>0.5</td><td>pts</td></tr><tr><td>Total segment</td><td>$2.9</td><td>-2.6</td><td>pts</td><td>$-8.5</td><td>-1.2</td><td>pts</td><td>$-5.6</td><td>-3.8</td><td>pts</td></tr><tr><td colspan="2">(Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding.)</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td></td><td>Total</td><td>2012</td><td>2013-14</td><td>2015-16</td><td>Later</td></tr><tr><td>Noncancelable operating leases</td><td>$185</td><td>$31</td><td>$63</td><td>$57</td><td>$34</td></tr><tr><td>Other purchase commitments</td><td>160</td><td>112</td><td>38</td><td>10</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>$345</td><td>$143</td><td>$101</td><td>$67</td><td>$34</td></tr></table>

Question: what is the percent change in other purchase commitments between 2013-14 and 2015-16?
Answer: 10
Reasoning program: multiply(const_10,38), divide(#0,38)