2014, 2013 and 2012.
The decrease in our consolidated net adjustments for 2014 compared to 2013 was primarily due to a decrease in profit booking rate adjustments at our Aeronautics, MFC and MST business segments.
The increase in our consolidated net adjustments for 2013 as compared to 2012 was primarily due to an increase in profit booking rate adjustments at our MST and MFC business segments and, to a lesser extent, the increase in the favorable resolution of contractual matters for the corporation.
The consolidated net adjustments for 2014 are inclusive of approximately $650 million in unfavorable items, which include reserves recorded on certain training and logistics solutions programs at MST and net warranty reserve adjustments for various programs (including JASSM and GMLRS) at MFC as described in the respective business segment’s results of operations below.
The consolidated net adjustments for 2013 and 2012 are inclusive of approximately $600 million and $500 million in unfavorable items, which include a significant profit reduction on the F-35 development contract in both years, as well as a significant profit reduction on the C-5 program in 2013, each as described in our Aeronautics business segment’s results of operations discussion below.
Aeronautics Our Aeronautics business segment is engaged in the research, design, development, manufacture, integration, sustainment, support and upgrade of advanced military aircraft, including combat and air mobility aircraft, unmanned air vehicles and related technologies.
Aeronautics’ major programs include the F-35 Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter, C-130 Hercules, F-16 Fighting Falcon, F-22 Raptor and the C-5M Super Galaxy.
Aeronautics’ operating results included the following (in millions):
## Table 0 ##
2014 compared to 2013 Aeronautics’ net sales for 2014 increased $797 million, or 6%, compared to 2013.
The increase was primarily attributable to higher net sales of approximately $790 million for F-35 production contracts due to increased volume and sustainment activities; about $55 million for the F-16 program due to increased deliveries (17 aircraft delivered in 2014 compared to 13 delivered in 2013) partially offset by contract mix; and approximately $45 million for the F-22 program due to increased risk retirements.
The increases were partially offset by lower net sales of approximately $55 million for the F-35 development contract due to decreased volume, partially offset by the absence in 2014 of the downward revision to the profit booking rate that occurred in 2013; and about $40 million for the C-130 program due to fewer deliveries (24 aircraft delivered in 2014 compared to 25 delivered in 2013) and decreased sustainment activities, partially offset by contract mix.
Aeronautics’ operating profit for 2014 increased $37 million, or 2%, compared to 2013.
The increase was primarily attributable to higher operating profit of approximately $85 million for the F-35 development contract due to the absence in 2014 of the downward revision to the profit booking rate that occurred in 2013; about $75 million for the F-22 program due to increased risk retirements; approximately $50 million for the C-130 program due to increased risk retirements and contract mix, partially offset by fewer deliveries; and about $25 million for the C-5 program due to the absence in 2014 of the downward revisions to the profit booking rate that occurred in 2013.
The increases were partially offset by lower operating profit of approximately $130 million for the F-16 program due to decreased risk retirements, partially offset by increased deliveries; and about $70 million for sustainment activities due to decreased risk retirements and volume.
Operating profit was comparable for F-35 production contracts as higher volume was offset by lower risk retirements.
Adjustments not related to volume, including net profit booking rate adjustments and other matters, were approximately $105 million lower for 2014 compared to 2013.
PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.  Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 2.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued) Previous Adoption of Fair Value Recognition Provisions As noted above, effective January 1, 2003, the Company changed its accounting for employee stock options to adopt the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No.123, as amended, prospectively for all new stock options granted to employees on or after January 1, 2003.
Prior to January 1, 2003, the Company accounted for employee stock options using the intrinsic value method of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No.25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and related interpretations.
Under this method, the Company did not recognize any stock-based compensation expense for employee stock options as all options granted had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying Common Stock on the date of grant.
If the Company had accounted for all employee stock options granted prior to January 1, 2003 under the fair value-based measurement method of SFAS No.123, net income and earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2006 would have been unchanged, since, as of January 1, 2006, there were no unvested employee stock options issued prior to January 1, 2003.
Net income and earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, would have been as follows:
## Table 1 ##
The fair value of each option issued prior to January 1, 2003 for purposes of the pro forma information presented above was estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model.
For options issued on or after January 1, 2003, the fair value of each option was estimated on the date of grant using a binomial option-pricing model.
The Company accounts for non-employee stock options using the fair value method in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No.96-18 “Accounting for Equity Instruments That Are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services” and related interpretations in accounting for its non-employee stock options.
Earnings Per Share As discussed in Note 1, the Company has outstanding two separate classes of common stock.
Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing available income attributable to each of the two groups of common shareholders by the respective weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period.
Diluted earnings per share includes the effect of all dilutive potential common shares that were outstanding during the period.
As discussed under “Excess Tax Benefits” above, the Company adopted SFAS No.123(R) using the modified prospective application transition method and has elected to calculate the “pool” of excess tax benefits in additional paid-in capital using the short-cut method.
The Company has further elected to reflect in assumed proceeds, under the application of the treasury stock method, the entire amount of excess tax benefits that would be recognized in additional paid-in capital upon exercise or release of the award.
PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.  Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 16.
EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS (continued) Pension benefits for foreign plans comprised 10% and 9% of the ending benefit obligation for 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Foreign plans comprised 2% and 1% of the ending fair value of plan assets for 2006 and 2005, respectively.
There are no foreign postretirement plans.
The projected benefit obligations, accumulated benefit obligations and fair value of plan assets for the pension plans with accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets were $1,354 million, $1,249 million and $7 million, respectively, at September 30, 2006 and $1,472 million, $1,372 million and $128 million, respectively, at September 30, 2005.
In 2006 and 2005, the pension plan purchased annuity contracts from Prudential Insurance for $4 million and zero million, respectively.
The approximate future annual benefit payment for all annuity contracts was $24 million and $23 million in 2006 and 2005, respectively.
The benefit obligation for pension benefits increased by $83 million in 2006 related to plan amendments.
There was an increase of $75 million for a cost of living adjustment for retirees and an increase of $11 million for changes as a result of the Pension Protection Act of 2006.
There was also a decrease of $3 million related to labor negotiations in a foreign location.
There were no material pension amendments in 2005.
There were postretirement amendments in both 2006 and 2005.
The benefit obligation for other postretirement benefits increased by $61 million for 2006.
There was an increase for $62 million related to the impact of implementing a Retiree Medical Savings Account, which provides an account at retirement that may be used toward the cost of coverage for medical and dental benefits, and a decrease of $1 million related to cost sharing changes for certain retirees for dental benefits.
The benefit obligation for other postretirement benefits decreased by $48 million in 2005, reflecting a decrease of $44 million related to cost sharing changes for certain retirees for medical and dental benefits and a decrease of $4 million related to changes in plan co-payment and coinsurance levels for certain retirees for medical benefits.
The incremental effects of applying SFAS No.158 on individual line items in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position on December 31, 2006 was as follows:
## Table 2 ##
PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL, INC.  Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 16.
EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS (continued) Pension benefits for foreign plans comprised 10% and 9% of the ending benefit obligation for 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Foreign plans comprised 2% and 1% of the ending fair value of plan assets for 2006 and 2005, respectively.
There are no foreign postretirement plans.
The projected benefit obligations, accumulated benefit obligations and fair value of plan assets for the pension plans with accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets were $1,354 million, $1,249 million and $7 million, respectively, at September 30, 2006 and $1,472 million, $1,372 million and $128 million, respectively, at September 30, 2005.
In 2006 and 2005, the pension plan purchased annuity contracts from Prudential Insurance for $4 million and zero million, respectively.
The approximate future annual benefit payment for all annuity contracts was $24 million and $23 million in 2006 and 2005, respectively.
The benefit obligation for pension benefits increased by $83 million in 2006 related to plan amendments.
There was an increase of $75 million for a cost of living adjustment for retirees and an increase of $11 million for changes as a result of the Pension Protection Act of 2006.
There was also a decrease of $3 million related to labor negotiations in a foreign location.
There were no material pension amendments in 2005.
There were postretirement amendments in both 2006 and 2005.
The benefit obligation for other postretirement benefits increased by $61 million for 2006.
There was an increase for $62 million related to the impact of implementing a Retiree Medical Savings Account, which provides an account at retirement that may be used toward the cost of coverage for medical and dental benefits, and a decrease of $1 million related to cost sharing changes for certain retirees for dental benefits.
The benefit obligation for other postretirement benefits decreased by $48 million in 2005, reflecting a decrease of $44 million related to cost sharing changes for certain retirees for medical and dental benefits and a decrease of $4 million related to changes in plan co-payment and coinsurance levels for certain retirees for medical benefits.
The incremental effects of applying SFAS No.158 on individual line items in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position on December 31, 2006 was as follows:
## Table 3 ##
Sales Results In managing our international insurance business, we analyze new annualized premiums, which do not correspond to revenues under U. S.  GAAP, as well as revenues, because new annualized premiums measure the current sales performance of the segment, while revenues reflect the renewal persistency and aging of in force policies written in prior years and net investment income, in addition to current sales.
New annualized premiums include 10% of first year premiums or deposits from single pay products.
New annualized premiums on an actual and constant exchange rate basis are as follows for the periods indicated.

Tables referenced above, in order (Table 0 first):
<table><tr><td></td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2012</td></tr><tr><td>Net sales</td><td>$14,920</td><td>$14,123</td><td>$14,953</td></tr><tr><td>Operating profit</td><td>1,649</td><td>1,612</td><td>1,699</td></tr><tr><td>Operating margins</td><td>11.1%</td><td>11.4%</td><td>11.4%</td></tr><tr><td>Backlog at year-end</td><td>$27,600</td><td>$28,000</td><td>$30,100</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td></td><td colspan="2"> Year Ended December 31, 2005</td><td colspan="2"> Year Ended December 31, 2004</td></tr><tr><td></td><td> Financial Services Businesses</td><td> Closed Block Business</td><td> Financial Services Businesses</td><td> Closed Block Business</td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="4"> (in millions, except per share amounts)</td></tr><tr><td>Net income, as reported</td><td>$3,219</td><td>$321</td><td>$1,674</td><td>$582</td></tr><tr><td>Add: Total employee stock option compensation expense included in reported net income, net of taxes</td><td>28</td><td>1</td><td>19</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Deduct: Total employee stock option compensation expense determined under the fair value based method for all awards, net oftaxes</td><td>38</td><td>1</td><td>45</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>Pro forma net income</td><td>$3,209</td><td>$321</td><td>$1,648</td><td>$581</td></tr><tr><td>Earnings per share:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Basic—as reported</td><td>$6.45</td><td>$119.50</td><td>$3.38</td><td>$249.00</td></tr><tr><td>Basic—pro forma</td><td>$6.43</td><td>$119.50</td><td>$3.33</td><td>$249.00</td></tr><tr><td>Diluted—as reported</td><td>$6.34</td><td>$119.50</td><td>$3.31</td><td>$249.00</td></tr><tr><td>Diluted—pro forma</td><td>$6.32</td><td>$119.50</td><td>$3.26</td><td>$249.00</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td></td><td> Pre-SFAS No. 158</td><td>Incremental effect of adopting SFAS No. 158</td><td> Post- SFAS No. 158</td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="3"> (in millions)</td></tr><tr><td>Other assets</td><td>$18,321</td><td>$-487</td><td>$17,834</td></tr><tr><td>Total assets</td><td>454,753</td><td>-487</td><td>454,266</td></tr><tr><td>Income taxes</td><td>$3,518</td><td>$-410</td><td>$3,108</td></tr><tr><td>Other liabilities</td><td>14,199</td><td>479</td><td>14,678</td></tr><tr><td>Total liabilities</td><td>431,305</td><td>69</td><td>431,374</td></tr><tr><td>Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)</td><td>$1,075</td><td>$-556</td><td>$519</td></tr><tr><td>Total stockholders’ equity</td><td>23,448</td><td>-556</td><td>22,892</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td></td><td colspan="3">Pension Benefits</td><td colspan="3">Other Postretirement Benefits</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td><td>2006</td><td>2005</td><td>2004</td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="6">(in millions)</td></tr><tr><td> Components of net periodic (benefit) cost</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Service cost</td><td>$160</td><td>$164</td><td>$147</td><td>$10</td><td>$11</td><td>$10</td></tr><tr><td>Interest cost</td><td>418</td><td>415</td><td>416</td><td>128</td><td>143</td><td>148</td></tr><tr><td>Expected return on plan assets</td><td>-741</td><td>-796</td><td>-831</td><td>-89</td><td>-80</td><td>-81</td></tr><tr><td>Amortization of transition obligation</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>-23</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>Amortization of prior service cost</td><td>22</td><td>25</td><td>25</td><td>-9</td><td>-5</td><td>-7</td></tr><tr><td>Amortization of actuarial (gain) loss, net</td><td>48</td><td>23</td><td>23</td><td>18</td><td>36</td><td>28</td></tr><tr><td>Settlements</td><td>—</td><td>3</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>2</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Curtailments</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Contractual termination benefits</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>-1</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Special termination benefits</td><td>4</td><td>10</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>Net periodic (benefit) cost</td><td>$-89</td><td>$-156</td><td>$-244</td><td>$59</td><td>$108</td><td>$99</td></tr></table>

Question: What's the current increasing rate of Service cost for Pension Benefits?
Answer: -0.02439
Reasoning program: subtract(160,164), divide(#0,164)