Company Stock Performance The following graph shows a comparison of cumulative total shareholder return, calculated on a dividend reinvested basis, for the Company, the S&P 500 Index, the S&P Information Technology Index and the Dow Jones U. S.  Technology Supersector Index for the five years ended September 24, 2016.
The graph assumes $100 was invested in each of the Company’s common stock, the S&P 500 Index, the S&P Information Technology Index and the Dow Jones U. S.  Technology Supersector Index as of the market close on September 23, 2011.
Note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.
## Table 0 ##
$100 invested on 9/23/11 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends.
Data points are the last day of each fiscal year for the Company’s common stock and September 30th for indexes.
Copyright?2016 S&P, a division of McGraw Hill Financial.
All rights reserved.
Copyright?2016 Dow Jones & Co.  All rights reserved.
that process, on October 30, 1997, the Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources approved the share pledge arrangements.
Subsequent to an additional 7% interest in PTNNT being offered by NTP for sale on March 28, 2008 (as required under the Contract of Work), the Director General of Mineral, Coal and Geothermal Resources at DEMR claimed that PTNNT breached its obligations under the Contract of Work by allowing shares to be offered for sale that are pledged to the Senior Lenders as security for the repayment of the senior debt.
In the letter, the Director General claimed that NTP would be in default under the Contract of Work if the shares of PTNNT offered for sale in March 2008, together with the shares offered in 2006 and 2007, were not in the possession of “Indonesian government and/or government owned entities,” free of any such senior pledge, by July 13, 2008.
Consequently, on July 10, 2008, PTNNT filed a notice to commence an additional international arbitration proceeding, as provided for under the Contract of Work, to resolve the claim that PTNNT breached its obligations under the Contract of Work by allowing shares to be offered that are subject to pledge obligations to the Senior Lenders.
This pledge of shares issue has since been incorporated into, and will be resolved as part of the initial arbitration proceeding.
In addition, we have, through PTNNT, been in discussions to extend our forest use permit (called a “Pinjam Pakai”) for over three years.
In 2005, Indonesian governmental authorities reviewed the contractual requirements for extension of the Pinjam Pakai and determined that PTNNT met those requirements.
This permit is a key requirement to continue to operate Batu Hijau efficiently, in addition to the ultimate life of the mine and recoverability of reserves.
However, the permit extension has not been received as of the date of this Annual Report.
The resulting delay has adversely impacted Batu Hijau, and may adversely impact future operating and financial results, including deferment or cancellation of future mine development and operations.
For more information on the results of the Batu Hijau operations, see Note 31 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Africa Operations
## Table 1 ##
(1) Includes incremental start-up ounces of 19 in 2008.
(2) Excludes Amortization, Accretion and the 2007 Loss on settlement of price-capped forward sales contracts.
Gold ounces sold at Ahafo increased in 2008 compared to 2007 due to a 25% increase in mill ore grade and higher throughput, partially offset by an increase in in-process inventory.
Total tons mined increased to 50.6 million tons in 2008 from 44.2 million tons in 2007, due to equipment additions, increased mining efficiencies and the operation of a third pit.
Costs applicable to sales per ounce increased due to higher diesel, power, royalties, maintenance and contract services costs, partially offset by higher production.
Amortization per ounce increased due to the use of additional equipment and the operation of a third pit.
Gold ounces sold at Ahafo increased in 2007 compared to 2006 as a result of a full year of production in 2007.
Costs applicable to sales per ounce increased due to higher mining and milling costs.
Mining costs increased primarily due to higher waste removal in the Apensu pit, higher fuel, pit dewatering and maintenance costs.
Milling costs increased due to higher electricity and maintenance costs.
Costs applicable to sales in 2006 also benefited from the capitalization of pre-production costs.
Consolidated gold sales are expected to remain constant at approximately 500,000 to 525,000 ounces in 2009.
Costs applicable to sales of approximately $450 to $475 per ounce is expected for 2009, primarily as a result of higher labor costs, a lower benefit from the capitalization of waste material used in the construction of assets, and higher fuel consumption.
costs, including higher labor and diesel costs.
Amortization increased 19% per pound and 15% per ounce due to higher equipment additions, partially offset by higher production.
Other Australia/New Zealand.
Gold production decreased 7% due to lower mill grade at Jundee and Waihi and lower mill grade and throughput at Tanami, partially offset by higher grade, throughput and recovery at Kalgoorlie.
Costs applicable to sales per ounce increased 9% due to lower production and a weaker U. S.  dollar.
Changes in Australia and New Zealand exchange rates increased Costs applicable to sales per ounce by $33.
Amortization per ounce decreased 14% due to lower mine development costs at Waihi and Jundee, partially offset by lower production.2009 compared to 2008 Batu Hijau, Indonesia.
Consolidated copper pounds and gold ounces produced increased 73% and 108%, respectively, due to higher mill throughput, grade and recovery due to processing higher grade Phase 5 ore compared to ore sourced primarily from lower grade and harder ore stockpiles in 2008.
Costs applicable to sales decreased 55% per pound and 48% per ounce due to higher production.
Costs applicable to sales per ounce also decreased due to a higher co-product allocation of costs to copper due to a higher realized copper price.
Amortization decreased 43% per pound and 35% per ounce due to higher production.
Other Australia/New Zealand.
Gold ounces produced decreased 4% due to lower throughput as a result of unplanned mill maintenance and lower grade at Tanami and a temporary suspension of milling operations due to an electrical fire at Waihi, partially offset by higher throughput and grade at Jundee and higher throughput, grade and recovery at Kalgoorlie.
Costs applicable to sales per ounce decreased 8% due to lower diesel prices, partially offset by lower production, a stronger Australian dollar and higher royalties.
Amortization per ounce increased 14% due to lower production, a higher mix of underground production at Jundee and a shortened mine life adjustment at Tanami.
Gold production for Asia Pacific is expected to decrease in 2011 to approximately 1.9 to 2.0 million ounces attributable to Newmont at higher consolidated Costs applicable to sales per ounce of approximately $600 to $675 in 2011, primarily due to lower production at Batu Hijau.
We expect copper production for the Asia Pacific region of approximately 190 to 220 million pounds attributable to Newmont at consolidated Costs applicable to sales per pound of approximately $1.25 to $1.50 in 2011.
Africa Operations
## Table 2 ##
(1) Consolidated Costs applicable to sales excludes Amortization and Reclamation and remediation.2010 compared to 2009 Ahafo, Ghana.
Gold ounces produced increased due to higher grade ore mined at Apensu in 2010 and the commencement of production at Amoma in October 2010.
Costs applicable to sales per ounce increased slightly due to higher labor, power, diesel and royalty costs, partially offset by higher production.
Amortization per ounce increased 20% due to higher capitalized mine development and equipment additions.2009 compared to 2008 Ahafo, Ghana.
Gold ounces produced increased due to higher throughput, partially offset by lower mill recovery.
Costs applicable to sales per ounce increased 9% due to higher labor, contracted
Costs applicable to sales per consolidated gold ounce increased 2% due to higher direct operating costs, partially offset by higher gold ounces sold and lower leach pad inventory adjustments.
Costs applicable to sales per consolidated copper pound decreased 21% primarily due to a lower co-product allocation of costs to copper.
Depreciation and amortization per consolidated gold ounce decreased 4% due to higher ounces sold, a lower asset balance at Yanacocha resulting from an impairment recorded in December 2016, and lower leach pad inventory adjustments.
Depreciation and amortization per consolidated copper pound decreased 25% due to a lower co-product allocation of depreciation and amortization to copper.
All-in sustaining costs per consolidated gold ounce increased 1% primarily due to higher costs applicable to sales per ounce.
All-in sustaining costs per consolidated copper pound sold decreased 19% primarily due to lower costs applicable to sales per pound.
North America Operations
## Table 3 ##
(1) Excludes Depreciation and amortization and Reclamation and remediation.
(2) All-In Sustaining Costs is a non-GAAP financial measure.
See Non-GAAP Financial Measures beginning on page 80.
(3) Long Canyon achieved commercial production in November 2016.
(4) All-In Sustaining Costs include expenses related to other regional projects that are designed to sustain current production and exploration, and Depreciation and amortization include expenses for other regional projects.2018 compared to 2017 Carlin, USA.
Gold production decreased 5% primarily due to lower leach tons placed and lower leach recoveries.
Costs applicable to sales per ounce increased 2% primarily due to higher stockpile and leach pad inventory adjustments and lower ounces sold.
Total stockpile and leach pad adjustments at Carlin include $22 related to a write-down at Emigrant from a change in mine plan, resulting in a significant decrease in mine life in the third quarter of 2018.
Depreciation and amortization per ounce increased 3% primarily due to higher stockpile and leach pad inventory adjustments and lower ounces sold.
All-in sustaining costs per ounce decreased 1% primarily due to lower sustaining capital spend.
Phoenix, USA.
Gold production increased 1% due to higher ore grade milled, partially offset by lower leach tons placed.
Copper production decreased 3% primarily due to lower ore grade milled.
Costs applicable to sales per ounce was in line with 2017 as higher maintenance costs were offset by high ounces sold.
Costs applicable to sales per pound increased 6% primarily due to lower copper pounds sold.
Depreciation and amortization per ounce decreased 11% primarily due to higher ounces sold and lower amortization rates.
Depreciation and amortization per pound increased 7% primarily due to lower copper pounds sold.
All-in sustaining costs per ounce increased 1% primarily due to higher sustaining capital spend.
All-in sustaining costs per pound increased 7% primarily due to higher costs applicable to sales per pound and higher sustaining capital spend.
Twin Creeks, USA.
Gold production decreased 4% primarily due to lower ore grades mined.
Costs applicable to sales per ounce increased 10% primarily due to lower ounces sold and higher stockpile and leach pad inventory adjustments.
Depreciation and amortization per ounce was in line with 2017.
All-in sustaining costs per ounce increased 11% primarily due to the higher costs applicable to sales per ounce.

Tables referenced above, in order (Table 0 first):
<table><tr><td></td><td>September2011</td><td>September2012</td><td>September2013</td><td>September2014</td><td>September2015</td><td>September2016</td></tr><tr><td>Apple Inc.</td><td>$100</td><td>$166</td><td>$123</td><td>$183</td><td>$212</td><td>$213</td></tr><tr><td>S&P 500 Index</td><td>$100</td><td>$130</td><td>$155</td><td>$186</td><td>$185</td><td>$213</td></tr><tr><td>S&P Information Technology Index</td><td>$100</td><td>$132</td><td>$142</td><td>$183</td><td>$187</td><td>$230</td></tr><tr><td>Dow Jones U.S. Technology Supersector Index</td><td>$100</td><td>$130</td><td>$137</td><td>$178</td><td>$177</td><td>$217</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td></td><td colspan="3"> Gold Ounces Sold<sup>-1</sup></td><td colspan="3"> Costs Applicable to Sales<sup>-2</sup></td><td colspan="3"> Amortization</td></tr><tr><td></td><td> 2008</td><td> 2007</td><td> 2006</td><td> 2008</td><td> 2007</td><td> 2006</td><td> 2008</td><td> 2007</td><td> 2006</td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="3"> (in thousands)</td><td colspan="3"> ($ per ounce)</td><td colspan="3"> ($ per ounce)</td></tr><tr><td>Ahafo</td><td>521</td><td>446</td><td>202</td><td>$408</td><td>$376</td><td>$257</td><td>$126</td><td>$96</td><td>$94</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td></td><td colspan="3"> Gold Ounces Produced</td><td colspan="3"> Costs Applicable to Sales<sup>-1</sup></td><td colspan="3"> Amortization</td></tr><tr><td></td><td> 2010</td><td> 2009</td><td> 2008</td><td> 2010</td><td> 2009</td><td> 2008</td><td> 2010</td><td> 2009</td><td> 2008</td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="3"> (in thousands)</td><td colspan="3"> ($ per ounce)</td><td colspan="3"> ($ per ounce)</td></tr><tr><td>Ahafo</td><td>545</td><td>532</td><td>525</td><td>$450</td><td>$444</td><td>$408</td><td>$150</td><td>$125</td><td>$126</td></tr><tr><td>Attributable to Newmont</td><td>545</td><td>532</td><td>525</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td></td><td colspan="3">Gold or Copper Produced</td><td colspan="3">Costs Applicable to Sales-1</td><td colspan="3">Depreciation and Amortization</td><td colspan="3">All-In Sustaining Costs-2</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>2018</td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td></tr><tr><td>GOLD</td><td colspan="3">(ounces in thousands)</td><td>($ per ounce sold)</td><td colspan="2"></td><td>($ per ounce sold)</td><td colspan="2"></td><td>($ per ounce sold)</td><td colspan="2"></td></tr><tr><td>Carlin</td><td>927</td><td>972</td><td>944</td><td>$843</td><td>$830</td><td>$836</td><td>$237</td><td>$229</td><td>$213</td><td>$1,027</td><td>$1,035</td><td>$1,040</td></tr><tr><td>Phoenix</td><td>241</td><td>239</td><td>209</td><td>854</td><td>854</td><td>799</td><td>201</td><td>227</td><td>251</td><td>1,043</td><td>1,035</td><td>946</td></tr><tr><td>Twin Creeks</td><td>359</td><td>375</td><td>453</td><td>668</td><td>606</td><td>517</td><td>170</td><td>170</td><td>112</td><td>820</td><td>741</td><td>615</td></tr><tr><td>Long Canyon-3</td><td>170</td><td>174</td><td>22</td><td>423</td><td>338</td><td>186</td><td>447</td><td>426</td><td>223</td><td>505</td><td>364</td><td>227</td></tr><tr><td>CC&V</td><td>360</td><td>451</td><td>396</td><td>727</td><td>622</td><td>552</td><td>232</td><td>272</td><td>275</td><td>840</td><td>725</td><td>623</td></tr><tr><td>Total / Weighted Average-4</td><td>2,057</td><td>2,211</td><td>2,024</td><td>$759</td><td>$712</td><td>$699</td><td>$238</td><td>$244</td><td>$207</td><td>$928</td><td>$876</td><td>$854</td></tr><tr><td>COPPER</td><td colspan="3">(pounds in millions)</td><td>($ per pound sold)</td><td colspan="2"></td><td>($ per pound sold)</td><td colspan="2"></td><td>($ per pound sold)</td><td colspan="2"></td></tr><tr><td>Phoenix</td><td>32</td><td>33</td><td>42</td><td>$1.83</td><td>$1.73</td><td>$2.23</td><td>$0.49</td><td>$0.46</td><td>$0.66</td><td>$2.24</td><td>$2.09</td><td>$2.60</td></tr><tr><td>COPPER</td><td colspan="3">(tonnes in thousands)</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Phoenix</td><td>14</td><td>15</td><td>19</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr></table>

Question: what is the 6 year return of the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index?
Answer: 1.17
Reasoning program: subtract(217,100), divide(#0,100)