world’s most advanced surface combatants.
In 2006, the group delivered USS Farragut and USS Gridley, the company’s 26th and 27th ships of the class.
Seven more ships are scheduled to be delivered between 2007 and 2011.
As the DDG-51 program winds down, the Navy and industry are transitioning to the next-generation guided-missile destroyer, the DDG-1000 Zumwalt Class, formerly known as DD(X).
The company has one of two contracts for the detail design of this multi-mission destroyer under a dual-lead-ship strategy, which, as directed by Congress, stipulates that the vessels be procured from two separate shipyards.
The company expects to receive a DDG-1000 construction contract in 2007.
Marine Systems leads one of two industry teams awarded competitive contracts for the design and construction of a new type of surface warship designated a Littoral Combat Ship (LCS).
As a key element of the Navy’s plan to maintain a sizeable fleet and address emerging maritime threats, the high-speed, multi-mission LCS platform is intended for defense against terrorist swarm boats, mines and submarine threats in coastal areas.
Marine Systems’ LCS design is derived from a proven commercial trimaran.
Its first ship is now under construction at a teammate’s Alabama facility and is scheduled to be launched in 2007.
The U. S.  Navy continues to assess the requirements for future LCS construction.
The group designed and produces the Lewis and Clark-class (T-AKE) dry cargo/ammunition combat-logistics ship.
This ship is the Navy’s first new combat-logistics ship design in almost 20 years, and it maximizes the Navy’s operational flexibility and endurance by transforming at-sea replenishment.
T-AKE enables efficient cargo transfer in port and at sea, and is the first modern Navy ship to incorporate proven commercial marine technologies, such as integrated electric-drive propulsion.
These technologies are designed to minimize T-AKE operations and maintenance costs over an expected 40-year life.
T-AKE ships support the Navy’s Sea Base vision by delivering ammunition, food, fuel, parts and other supplies to U. S.  and NATO forces around the world, and to Navy ships operating at sea.
The group delivered the lead ship, USNS Lewis and Clark, in June 2006.
The group designs and produces commercial ships to meet Jones Act requirements that U. S. -built ships be used to transport commercial goods between U. S.  ports.
In August, the group signed a contract with U. S.  Shipping Partners to build nine product carrier ships, with options for five additional ships.
The product carriers are based on a design the company obtained through an agreement with a subsidiary of Daewoo Shipbuilding and Marine Engineering (DSME).
The partnership allows the group to offer proven containerships, tankers, bulk carriers and other designs to Jones Act customers.
Construction of the first ship is scheduled to begin in 2007, with delivery expected in 2009.
This new work builds on the group’s experience with the design and construction of double-hull oil tankers.
In August 2006, the group delivered the last of four double-hull tankers to BP Shipping Ltd. , two weeks ahead of schedule.
In addition, the Marine Systems group provides comprehensive ship and submarine repair support services to the Navy and commercial customers in a variety of locations worldwide.
Internationally, the group provides key allies with program management, planning and design support for submarine and surface-ship construction programs.
In partnership with the Navy and local governments, the group continues to invest in its shipyards to remain competitive and improve operating margins.
The group’s three shipyards were recognized as world-class facilities in 2006, exceeding the U. S.  and international averages in numerous areas of shipyard technology based on analysis by independent international shipbuilding consultants commissioned by the Department of Defense.
Net sales for the Marine Systems group were 21 percent of the company’s consolidated net sales in 2006, 23 percent in 2005 and 25 percent in 2004.
Net sales by major products and services were as follows:
## Table 0 ##
INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGY The Information Systems and Technology group offers a breadth and depth of technology and service capabilities that support a wide range of government and commercial needs.
Since it was created in 1997, the group has grown into a business that provides systems integration expertise; hardware and software products; and engineering, management and support services.
Its three principal markets are: ?
Tactical and strategic mission systems – The group designs, builds and supports secure command, control, communications and computing systems for defense customers worldwide, and is a recognized leader in information-assurance products and systems for U. S.  defense and national-security customers.  ?
Information technology and mission services – The group provides mission-critical information technology (IT) and skilled mission-support services to U. S.  defense and national-security customers, as well as select federal civilian agencies and commercial customers.
The group also specializes in the design, development and integration of wireline and wireless voice, video and data networks, mission simulation and training services, and secure identification and credentialing capabilities.
Table 48 - Selected Quarterly Income Statement Data (1)
## Table 1 ##
THE HERSHEY COMPANY NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued) (amounts in thousands, except share data or if otherwise indicated) liabilities of $23,909.
At December 31, 2014, the remaining amount reflected in liabilities related to the fair value of options contracts and other non-exchange traded derivative instruments.
At December 31, 2013, the amount reflected in assets related to the fair value of options contracts.
(3) The fair value of foreign currency forward exchange contracts is the difference between the contract and current market foreign currency exchange rates at the end of the period.
We estimate the fair value of foreign currency forward exchange contracts on a quarterly basis by obtaining market quotes of spot and forward rates for contracts with similar terms, adjusted where necessary for maturity differences.
These contracts are classified as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy.
(4) The fair value of interest rate swap agreements represents the difference in the present value of cash flows calculated at the contracted interest rates and at current market interest rates at the end of the period.
We calculate the fair value of interest rate swap agreements quarterly based on the quoted market price for the same or similar financial instruments.
Such contracts are categorized as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy.
(5) The fair value of the cross-currency swap agreement is categorized as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy and is estimated based on the difference between the contract and current market foreign currency exchange rates at the end of the period.
(6) The fair value of deferred compensation derivatives is based on quotes prices for market interest rates and a broad market equity index and is, therefore, categorized as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy.
Other Financial Instruments The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, accounts receivable, accounts payable and short-term debt approximated fair value as of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 because of the relatively short maturity of these instruments.
The estimated fair value of our long-term debt is based on quoted market prices for similar debt issues and is, therefore, classified as Level 2 within the valuation hierarchy.
The fair values and carrying values of long-term debt, including the current portion, was as follows:
## Table 2 ##
Other Fair Value Measurements In addition to assets and liabilities that are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis, U. S.  GAAP requires that, under certain circumstances, we also record assets and liabilities at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.
Generally, assets are recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as a result of impairment charges.
As discussed in Note 2, in connection with the planned Mauna Loa divestiture, we classified the net assets as held for sale as of December 31, 2014, resulting in an impairment charge of $18,531 based upon the agreed-upon sales price and related transaction costs.
The loss was calculated based on Level 3 inputs and included in 2014 earnings.
Also in 2014, as discussed in Note 3, in connection with our annual impairment testing of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets, we recorded impairment charges totaling $15,900 relating to our India business.
These charges were determined by comparing the fair value of the assets to their carrying value.
The fair value of the assets was derived using discounted cash flow analyses based on Level 3 inputs.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) (Amounts in Millions, Except Per Share Amounts) During 2006 and 2005 we awarded 9.9 and 2.9 shares of performance-based stock, at target, with a weightedaverage grant-date fair value of $9.68 and $12.35 per award, respectively.
No performance-based stock was granted during 2004.
The total fair value of performance-based stock distributed to participants during 2006 was $0.1.
No performance-based stock awards were distributed during 2005.
Certain stock-based compensation awards expected to be settled in cash have been classified as liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2006 and 2005.
A summary of the activity of our non-vested restricted stock, restricted stock units, and performance-based stock during 2006 is presented below (performance-based stock awards are shown at 100% of the shares originally granted):

Tables referenced above, in order (Table 0 first):
<table><tr><td> Year Ended December 31</td><td> 2006</td><td> 2005</td><td> 2004</td></tr><tr><td>Nuclear submarines</td><td>$2,427</td><td>$2,396</td><td>$2,432</td></tr><tr><td>Surface combatants</td><td>1,088</td><td>1,008</td><td>1,002</td></tr><tr><td>Auxiliary and commercial ships</td><td>807</td><td>598</td><td>576</td></tr><tr><td>Repair and other services</td><td>618</td><td>693</td><td>716</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>$4,940</td><td>$4,695</td><td>$4,726</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td></td><td colspan="4"> 2013</td></tr><tr><td> <i>(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)</i> </td><td>Fourth</td><td>Third</td><td>Second</td><td>First</td></tr><tr><td>Interest income</td><td>$469,824</td><td>$462,912</td><td>$462,582</td><td>$465,319</td></tr><tr><td>Interest expense</td><td>39,175</td><td>38,060</td><td>37,645</td><td>41,149</td></tr><tr><td>Net interest income</td><td>430,649</td><td>424,852</td><td>424,937</td><td>424,170</td></tr><tr><td>Provision for credit losses</td><td>24,331</td><td>11,400</td><td>24,722</td><td>29,592</td></tr><tr><td>Net interest income after provision for credit losses</td><td>406,318</td><td>413,452</td><td>400,215</td><td>394,578</td></tr><tr><td>Total noninterest income</td><td>249,892</td><td>253,767</td><td>251,919</td><td>256,618</td></tr><tr><td>Total noninterest expense</td><td>446,009</td><td>423,336</td><td>445,865</td><td>442,793</td></tr><tr><td>Income before income taxes</td><td>210,201</td><td>243,883</td><td>206,269</td><td>208,403</td></tr><tr><td>Provision for income taxes</td><td>52,029</td><td>65,047</td><td>55,269</td><td>55,129</td></tr><tr><td>Net income</td><td>$158,172</td><td>$178,836</td><td>$151,000</td><td>$153,274</td></tr><tr><td>Dividends on preferred shares</td><td>7,965</td><td>7,967</td><td>7,967</td><td>7,970</td></tr><tr><td>Net income applicable to common shares</td><td>$150,207</td><td>$170,869</td><td>$143,033</td><td>$145,304</td></tr><tr><td>Common shares outstanding</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Average—basic</td><td>830,590</td><td>830,398</td><td>834,730</td><td>841,103</td></tr><tr><td>Average—diluted<sup>-2</sup></td><td>842,324</td><td>841,025</td><td>843,840</td><td>848,708</td></tr><tr><td>Ending</td><td>830,963</td><td>830,145</td><td>829,675</td><td>838,758</td></tr><tr><td>Book value per share</td><td>$6.86</td><td>$6.70</td><td>$6.49</td><td>$6.52</td></tr><tr><td>Tangible book value per share<sup>-3</sup></td><td>6.26</td><td>6.09</td><td>5.87</td><td>5.90</td></tr><tr><td>Per common share</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Net income—basic</td><td>$0.18</td><td>$0.21</td><td>$0.17</td><td>$0.17</td></tr><tr><td>Net income —diluted</td><td>0.18</td><td>0.20</td><td>0.17</td><td>0.17</td></tr><tr><td>Cash dividends declared</td><td>0.05</td><td>0.05</td><td>0.05</td><td>0.04</td></tr><tr><td>Common stock price, per share</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>High<sup>-4</sup></td><td>$9.73</td><td>$8.78</td><td>$7.96</td><td>$7.55</td></tr><tr><td>Low<sup>-4</sup></td><td>8.04</td><td>7.90</td><td>6.82</td><td>6.48</td></tr><tr><td>Close</td><td>9.65</td><td>8.26</td><td>7.87</td><td>7.37</td></tr><tr><td>Average closing price</td><td>8.98</td><td>8.45</td><td>7.46</td><td>7.07</td></tr><tr><td>Return on average total assets</td><td>1.09%</td><td>1.27%</td><td>1.08%</td><td>1.12%</td></tr><tr><td>Return on average common shareholders’ equity</td><td>10.5</td><td>12.3</td><td>10.4</td><td>10.8</td></tr><tr><td>Return on average tangible common shareholders’ equity<sup>-5</sup></td><td>12.1</td><td>14.2</td><td>12.1</td><td>12.5</td></tr><tr><td>Efficiency ratio<sup>-6</sup></td><td>63.4</td><td>60.3</td><td>63.7</td><td>62.9</td></tr><tr><td>Effective tax rate (benefit)</td><td>24.8</td><td>26.7</td><td>26.8</td><td>26.5</td></tr><tr><td>Margin analysis-as a % of average earning assets<sup>-7</sup></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Interest income<sup>-7</sup></td><td>3.58%</td><td>3.64%</td><td>3.68%</td><td>3.75%</td></tr><tr><td>Interest expense</td><td>0.30</td><td>0.30</td><td>0.30</td><td>0.33</td></tr><tr><td>Net interest margin<sup>-7</sup></td><td>3.28%</td><td>3.34%</td><td>3.38%</td><td>3.42%</td></tr><tr><td>Revenue—FTE</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Net interest income</td><td>$430,649</td><td>$424,852</td><td>$424,937</td><td>$424,170</td></tr><tr><td>FTE adjustment</td><td>8,196</td><td>6,634</td><td>6,587</td><td>5,923</td></tr><tr><td>Net interest income<sup>-7</sup></td><td>438,845</td><td>431,486</td><td>431,524</td><td>430,093</td></tr><tr><td>Noninterest income</td><td>249,892</td><td>253,767</td><td>251,919</td><td>256,618</td></tr><tr><td>Total revenue<sup>-7</sup></td><td>$688,737</td><td>$685,253</td><td>$683,443</td><td>$686,711</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td></td><td colspan="2">Fair Value</td><td colspan="2">Carrying Value</td></tr><tr><td>At December 31,</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td></tr><tr><td>Current portion of long-term debt</td><td>$257,280</td><td>$914</td><td>$250,805</td><td>$914</td></tr><tr><td>Long-term debt</td><td>1,722,308</td><td>1,947,023</td><td>1,548,963</td><td>1,795,142</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>$1,979,588</td><td>$1,947,937</td><td>$1,799,768</td><td>$1,796,056</td></tr></table>

Question: what's the total amount of Surface combatants of 2006, and Interest income of 2013 Second ?
Answer: 463670
Reasoning program: add(1088.0,462582.0)