Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis 12 The decrease in interest income in 2002 was primarily due to:  interest recognized in 2001 on Grand Gulf 1's decommissioning trust funds resulting from the final order addressing System Energy's rate proceeding;  interest recognized in 2001 at Entergy Mississippi and Entergy New Orleans on the deferred System Energy costs that were not being recovered through rates; and  lower interest earned on declining deferred fuel balances.
The decrease in interest charges in 2002 is primarily due to:  a decrease of $31.9 million in interest on long-term debt primarily due to the retirement of long-term debt in late 2001 and early 2002; and  a decrease of $76.0 million in other interest expense primarily due to interest recorded on System Energy's reserve for rate refund in 2001.
The refund was made in December 2001.2001 Compared to 2000 Results for the year ended December 31, 2001 for U. S.  Utility were also affected by an increase in interest charges of $61.5 million primarily due to:  the final FERC order addressing the 1995 System Energy rate filing;  debt issued at Entergy Arkansas in July 2001, at Entergy Gulf States in June 2000 and August 2001, at Entergy Mississippi in January 2001, and at Entergy New Orleans in July 2000 and February 2001; and  borrowings under credit facilities during 2001, primarily at Entergy Arkansas.
Non-Utility Nuclear The increase in earnings in 2002 for Non-Utility Nuclear from $128 million to $201 million was primarily due to the operation of Indian Point 2 and Vermont Yankee, which were purchased in September 2001 and July 2002, respectively.
The increase in earnings in 2001 for Non-Utility Nuclear from $49 million to $128 million was primarily due to the operation of FitzPatrick and Indian Point 3 for a full year, as each was purchased in November 2000, and the operation of Indian Point 2, which was purchased in September 2001.
Following are key performance measures for Non-Utility Nuclear:
## Table 0 ##
2002 Compared to 2001 The following fluctuations in the results of operations for Non-Utility Nuclear in 2002 were primarily caused by the acquisitions of Indian Point 2 and Vermont Yankee (except as otherwise noted):  operating revenues increased $411.0 million to $1.2 billion;  other operation and maintenance expenses increased $201.8 million to $596.3 million;  depreciation and amortization expenses increased $25.1 million to $42.8 million;  fuel expenses increased $29.4 million to $105.2 million;  nuclear refueling outage expenses increased $23.9 million to $46.8 million, which was due primarily to a
Table of Contents
## Table 1 ##
Year ended December 31, 2009
In 2011 we had net gains on investment securities of $195.0 million, compared to net gains of $93.4 million and net losses of $31.2 million in 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Non-GAAP gains on investment securities, net of noncontrolling interests, were $32.7 million in 2011, compared to net gains of $16.1 million and net losses of $4.6 million in 2010 and 2009, respectively (amounts also exclude gains of $37.3 million and $24.7 million from the sales of certain available-for-sale securities in 2011 and 2010, respectively).
The gains, net of noncontrolling interests and excluding gains from the sale of certain available-for-sale securities, of $32.7 million in 2011 were primarily attributable to the following: .
Net gains of $14.7 million from our managed funds, primarily due to increased valuations and liquidity events from companies (primarily internet and social networking).  . Net gains of $10.4 million from our strategic and other investments, which included gains of $6.5 million from the sale of private company shares that were originally acquired through the exercise of equity warrant assets.  . Net gains of $7.7 million from our debt funds due primarily to unrealized gains related to our share of debt fund operating income and gains from distributions.
PERSONAL INSURANCE Personal Insurance writes a broad range of property and casualty insurance covering personal risks.
The primary coverages in Personal Insurance are automobile and homeowners insurance sold to individuals.
These products are distributed through independent agents, sponsoring organizations such as employee and affinity groups, joint marketing arrangements with other insurers, and direct marketing.
Selected Product and Distribution Channel Information The following table sets forth net written premiums for the Personal Insurance segment’s business by product line for the periods indicated.
For a description of the product lines referred to in the following table, see ‘‘—Product Lines.
’’ In addition, see ‘‘—Principal Markets and Methods of Distribution’’ for a discussion of distribution channels for Personal Insurance’s product lines.
## Table 2 ##
Principal Markets and Methods of Distribution Personal Insurance products are distributed primarily through approximately 12,400 independent agents located throughout the United States, supported by personnel in 16 marketing regions and seven service centers.
In selecting new independent agencies to distribute its products, Personal Insurance considers, among other attributes, each agency’s profitability, financial stability, staff experience and strategic fit with Personal Insurance’s operating and marketing plans.
Once an agency is appointed, Personal Insurance carefully monitors its performance.
While the principal markets for Personal Insurance’s insurance products continue to be in states along the East Coast, California and Texas, Personal Insurance continues to expand its geographic presence across the United States.
Personal Insurance uses a consistent operating model that provides technological alternatives to independent agents to maximize their ease of doing business.
Personal Insurance independent agents quote and issue nearly all of Personal Insurance’s new business policies directly from their agencies by leveraging either their own agency management system or using Personal Insurance’s proprietary quote and issuance systems which allow agents to rate, quote and issue policies on line.
All of these quote and issue platforms interface with Personal Insurance’s underwriting and rating systems, which monitor transactions for compliance with Personal Insurance’s underwriting and pricing programs.
Business processed by agents on these platforms is subject to consultative review by Personal Insurance’s in-house underwriters.
Personal Insurance continues to develop functionality to provide its agents with online service capabilities packaged together in an agency service portal, including customer service, marketing and claim functionality.
Agencies can also choose to shift the ongoing service responsibility for Personal Insurance’s customers to one of the Company’s four Customer Care Centers, where the Company provides, on behalf of an agency, a comprehensive array of direct customer service needs, including response to billing and coverage inquiries, and policy changes.
Approximately 1,950 agents take advantage of this service alternative.
Personal Insurance also markets through additional distribution channels, including sponsoring organizations such as employers and consumer associations, and direct marketing.
Personal Insurance

Tables referenced above, in order (Table 0 first):
<table><tr><td></td><td>2002</td><td>2001</td><td>2000</td></tr><tr><td>Net MW in operation at December 31</td><td>3,955</td><td>3,445</td><td>2,475</td></tr><tr><td>Generation in GWh for the year</td><td>29,953</td><td>22,614</td><td>7,171</td></tr><tr><td>Capacity factor for the year</td><td>93%</td><td>93%</td><td>94%</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td></td><td colspan="6">Year ended December 31, 2010</td></tr><tr><td> (Dollars in thousands)</td><td>Managed Funds Of Funds</td><td>Managed Direct Venture Funds</td><td> Debt Funds</td><td>Available- For-Sale Securities</td><td>Strategic and Other Investments</td><td>Total</td></tr><tr><td>Total gains on investment securities, net</td><td>$41,198</td><td>$19,127</td><td>$4,745</td><td>$24,823</td><td>$3,467</td><td>$93,360</td></tr><tr><td>Less: income attributable to noncontrolling interests, including carried interest</td><td>36,069</td><td>16,496</td><td>21</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>52,586</td></tr><tr><td>Non-GAAP net gains on investment securities, net of noncontrolling interests</td><td>5,129</td><td>2,631</td><td>4,724</td><td>24,823</td><td>3,467</td><td>40,774</td></tr><tr><td>Less: gains on sales of certain available-for-sale securities</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>24,699</td><td>—</td><td>24,699</td></tr><tr><td>Non-GAAP net gains on investment securities, net of noncontrolling interests and excluding gains on sales of certain available-for-salesecurities</td><td>$5,129</td><td>$2,631</td><td>$4,724</td><td>$124</td><td>$3,467</td><td>$16,075</td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="6">Year ended December 31, 2009</td></tr><tr><td> (Dollars in thousands)</td><td>Managed Funds Of Funds</td><td>Managed Direct Venture Funds</td><td> Debt Funds</td><td>Available- For-Sale Securities</td><td>Strategic and Other Investments</td><td>Total</td></tr><tr><td>Total (losses) gains on investment securities, net</td><td>$-28,894</td><td>$-2,467</td><td>$4,490</td><td>$-168</td><td>$-4,170</td><td>$-31,209</td></tr><tr><td>Less: (losses) income attributable to noncontrolling interests, including carried interest</td><td>-24,569</td><td>-2,938</td><td>869</td><td>—</td><td>—</td><td>-26,638</td></tr><tr><td>Non-GAAP net (losses) gains on investment securities, net of noncontrolling interests</td><td>$-4,325</td><td>$471</td><td>$3,621</td><td>$-168</td><td>$-4,170</td><td>$-4,571</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td> (for the year ended December 31, in millions)</td><td> 2010</td><td> 2009</td><td> 2008</td><td> % of Total 2010</td><td></td></tr><tr><td> By product line:</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Automobile</td><td>$3,772</td><td>$3,629</td><td>$3,660</td><td> 49.8</td><td> %</td></tr><tr><td>Homeowners and Other</td><td>3,795</td><td>3,520</td><td>3,335</td><td> 50.2</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Total Personal Insurance</td><td>$7,567</td><td>$7,149</td><td>$6,995</td><td> 100.0</td><td> %</td></tr></table>

Question: what is the percent change in operating revenues from 2001 to 2002?
Answer: 1.91971
Reasoning program: multiply(1.2,const_1000), subtract(#0,411.0), divide(#1,411.0)