Holding other assumptions constant, the following table reflects what a one hundred basis point increase and decrease in our estimated long-term rate of return on plan assets would have on our estimated 2011 pension expense (in millions):
## Table 0 ##
Estimated future contributions We estimate contributions of approximately $403 million in 2011 as compared with $288 million in 2010.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets Goodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair market value of the net assets acquired.
We classify our intangible assets acquired as either trademarks, customer relationships, technology, non-compete agreements, or other purchased intangibles.
Our goodwill and other intangible balances at December 31, 2010 increased to $8.6 billion and $3.6 billion, respectively, compared to $6.1 billion and $791 million, respectively, at December 31, 2009, primarily as a result of the Hewitt acquisition.
Although goodwill is not amortized, we test it for impairment at least annually in the fourth quarter.
In the fourth quarter, we also test acquired trademarks (which also are not amortized) for impairment.
We test more frequently if there are indicators of impairment or whenever business circumstances suggest that the carrying value of goodwill or trademarks may not be recoverable.
These indicators may include a sustained significant decline in our share price and market capitalization, a decline in our expected future cash flows, or a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate, among others.
No events occurred during 2010 or 2009 that indicate the existence of an impairment with respect to our reported goodwill or trademarks.
We perform impairment reviews at the reporting unit level.
A reporting unit is an operating segment or one level below an operating segment (referred to as a ‘‘component’’).
A component of an operating segment is a reporting unit if the component constitutes a business for which discrete financial information is available and segment management regularly reviews the operating results of that component.
An operating segment shall be deemed to be a reporting unit if all of its components are similar, if none of its components is a reporting unit, or if the segment comprises only a single component.
The goodwill impairment test is a two step analysis.
Step One requires the fair value of each reporting unit to be compared to its book value.
Management must apply judgment in determining the estimated fair value of the reporting units.
If the fair value of a reporting unit is determined to be greater than the carrying value of the reporting unit, goodwill and trademarks are deemed not to be impaired and no further testing is necessary.
If the fair value of a reporting unit is less than the carrying value, we perform Step Two.
Step Two uses the calculated fair value of the reporting unit to perform a hypothetical purchase price allocation to the fair value of the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit.
The difference between the fair value of the reporting unit calculated in Step One and the fair value of the underlying assets and liabilities of the reporting unit is the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill.
A charge is recorded in the financial statements if the carrying value of the reporting unit’s goodwill is greater than its implied fair value.
Property, Plant and Equipment As of December 31, 2012, the carrying value of our property, plant and equipment, net of depreciation, was $14,476 million, or 17 percent of our total assets.
Certain events or changes in circumstances may indicate that the recoverability of the carrying amount or remaining useful life of property, plant and equipment should be assessed, including, among others, the manner or length of time in which the Company intends to use the asset, a significant decrease in market value, a significant change in the business climate in a particular market, or a current period operating or cash flow loss combined with historical losses or projected future losses.
When such events or changes in circumstances are present and an impairment review is performed, we estimate the future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset (or asset group) and its eventual disposition.
These estimated future cash flows are consistent with those we use in our internal planning.
If the sum of the expected future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) is less than the carrying amount, we recognize an impairment loss.
The impairment loss recognized is the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value.
We use a variety of methodologies to determine the fair value of property, plant and equipment, including appraisals and discounted cash flow models, which are consistent with the assumptions we believe hypothetical marketplace participants would use.
Goodwill, Trademarks and Other Intangible Assets Intangible assets are classified into one of three categories: (1) intangible assets with definite lives subject to amortization, (2) intangible assets with indefinite lives not subject to amortization and (3) goodwill.
For intangible assets with definite lives, tests for impairment must be performed if conditions exist that indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable.
For intangible assets with indefinite lives and goodwill, tests for impairment must be performed at least annually or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate that assets might be impaired.
The following table presents the carrying values of intangible assets included in our consolidated balance sheet (in millions):
## Table 1 ##
* Accounts for less than 1 percent of the Company’s total assets.
When facts and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of definite-lived intangible assets may not be recoverable, management assesses the recoverability of the carrying value by preparing estimates of sales volume and the resulting gross profit and cash flows.
These estimated future cash flows are consistent with those we use in our internal planning.
If the sum of the expected future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) is less than the carrying amount of the asset (or asset group), we recognize an impairment loss.
The impairment loss recognized is the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value.
We use a variety of methodologies to determine the fair value of these assets, including discounted cash flow models, which are consistent with the assumptions we believe hypothetical marketplace participants would use.
We test intangible assets determined to have indefinite useful lives, including trademarks, franchise rights and goodwill, for impairment annually, or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate that assets might be impaired.
Our Company performs these annual impairment reviews as of the first day of our third fiscal quarter.
We use a variety of methodologies in conducting impairment assessments of indefinite-lived intangible assets, including, but not limited to, discounted cash flow models, which are based on the assumptions we believe hypothetical marketplace participants would use.
For indefinite-lived intangible assets, other than goodwill, if the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, an impairment charge is recognized in an amount equal to that excess.
The Company has the option to perform a qualitative assessment of indefinite-lived intangible assets, other than goodwill, prior to completing the impairment test described above.
The Company must assess whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of the intangible asset is less than its carrying amount.
If the Company concludes that this is the case, it must perform the testing described above.
Otherwise, the Company does not need to perform any further assessment.
During 2012, the Company only performed qualitative assessments on less than 10 percent of our indefinite-lived intangible assets balance.
a $10 million favorable adjustment to the Tax Act transition tax provisional estimate; the accounting for this item is complete.
For further discussion of the Tax Act, see Note 15, "Income Taxes," included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.  Equity in (Losses) Earnings of Unconsolidated Subsidiaries.
Equity in (losses) earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 primarily related to our investment in Mekonomen.
During the year ended December 31, 2018, we recorded $71 million in other-than-temporary impairments related to our investment in Mekonomen.
See Note 4, "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" to the consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information on the impairment charges.
The impairment charges are excluded from our calculation of Segment EBITDA.
See Note 16, "Segment and Geographic Information" to the consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for our reconciliation of Net Income to Segment EBITDA.
Foreign Currency Impact.
We translate our statements of income at the average exchange rates in effect for the period.
Relative to the rates used during the year ended December 31, 2017, the Czech koruna, euro, and pound sterling rates used to translate the 2018 statements of income increased by 7.2%, 4.5%, and 3.6%, respectively.
The translation effect of the change in foreign currencies against the U. S.  dollar and realized and unrealized currency losses for the year ended December 31, 2018 resulted in a $0.02 positive effect on diluted earnings per share from continuing operations relative to the prior year.
Net Loss from Discontinued Operations.
We recorded net losses from discounted operations of $4 million and $7 million during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Discontinued operations represents the automotive glass manufacturing business of PGW, which we sold on March 1, 2017.
See Note 3, "Discontinued Operations" to the consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information.
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest.
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest for the year ended December 31, 2018 increased $7 million from 2017 due to (i) a $5 million increase in our North America segment, as we allocated a loss of $4 million to the noncontrolling interest of an immaterial subsidiary during the year ended December 31, 2017, and (ii) a $2 million increase related to the noncontrolling interest of subsidiaries acquired in connection with the Stahlgruber acquisition.
Year Ended December 31, 2017 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2016 Revenue.
The following table summarizes the changes in revenue by category (in thousands):
## Table 2 ##
Note: In the table above, the sum of the individual percentages may not equal the total due to rounding.
The change in parts and services revenue of 13.1% represented increases in segment revenue of 6.7% in North America, 24.5% in Europe, and 6.7% in Specialty.
The increase in other revenue of 20.2% primarily consisted of an $86 million organic increase in other revenue, which was largely attributable to our North America segment.
Refer to the discussion of our segment results of operations for factors contributing to the change in revenue by segment during 2017 compared to the prior year.
Cost of Goods Sold.
Cost of goods sold remained flat at 61.0% of revenue for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.
Cost of goods sold decreased 0.3% as a result of our North America segment, primarily related to our salvage operations.
Offsetting this decrease were roughly equal increases in cost of goods sold in our Europe and Specialty segments.
Refer to the discussion of our segment results of operations for factors contributing to the changes in cost of goods sold as a percentage of revenue by segment for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to the year ended December 31, 2016.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.
Our SG&A expenses as a percentage of revenue for the year ended December 31, 2017 increased to 27.9% in 2017 from 27.5% in 2016, primarily as a result of a 0.4% increase from our Europe segment and a 0.2% increase from our North America segment.
Partially offsetting these increases was a decrease in SG&A expense as a percentage of revenue in our Specialty segment.
Refer to the discussion of our segment results of operations for factors contributing to the changes in SG&A expenses as a percentage of revenue by segment for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to the year ended December 31, 2016.
The largest impact resulting from the challenging market conditions was an increase in DAC and DSI amortization of $385 million.
The acceleration of amortization resulted primarily from the decline in the market value of our separate account balances, which is directly tied to the financial markets.
A factor that determines the amount of amortization is expected future earnings, which in this annuity business are derived, in part, from fees earned on separate account balances.
In 2008, projection of separate account fees were reduced and as a result, we recognized more amortization in the current period.
The lower market value of our separate account balances also resulted in a $96 million decrease in policy fees and other revenues.
Policy fees from variable investment-type products are typically calculated as a percentage of the daily asset balance in the policyholder accounts.
The value of these assets can fluctuate depending on performance of the equity markets.
Also contributing to the decrease in operating earnings was a decline in net investment income of $244 million, which was primarily due to decreasing yields on our investment portfolio and an increased allocation to lower yielding more liquid investments in response to the extraordinary market conditions.
Yields were adversely impacted by the severe downturn in the global financial markets which impacted other limited partnership interests, and cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments.
Partially offsetting the market-related declines was $15 million of lower expenses.
A decrease in non-deferrable volume related expenses was partially offset by the impact of revisions to certain pension and postretirement liabilities in 2008.
The increase in the pension and postretirement liabilities was the result of a decline in the value of the assets supporting the liabilities.
The decline in the asset value is also a direct impact of the volatile market conditions.
Corporate Benefit Funding
## Table 3 ##
Decreasing yields on our other limited partnership interests, real estate joint ventures and fixed maturity securities caused by the severe downturn in the global financial markets resulted in a $495 million decrease in net investment income, and was the primary reason for the $297 million decline in operating earnings.
As many of our products are interest spread-based, the lower net investment income was somewhat offset by lower interest credited expense on our investment-type contracts of $276 million.
In addition, a charge of $75 million related to a liability refinement in the pension closeout business and an increase in interest credited on future policyholder benefits, which is consistent with an aging block of business, contributed to the decline in operating earnings.
Such declines were partially offset by fees earned of $28 million on the surrender of a global funding agreement contract in 2008.

Tables referenced above, in order (Table 0 first):
<table><tr><td></td><td>Change in long-term rateof return on plan assets</td></tr><tr><td>Increase (decrease) in expense</td><td>Increase</td><td>Decrease</td></tr><tr><td>U.S. plans</td><td>$-14</td><td>$14</td></tr><tr><td>U.K. plans</td><td>-35</td><td>35</td></tr><tr><td>The Netherlands plan</td><td>-5</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>Canada plans</td><td>-2</td><td>2</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td>December 31, 2012</td><td>CarryingValue</td><td>Percentageof TotalAssets</td></tr><tr><td>Goodwill</td><td>$12,255</td><td>14%</td></tr><tr><td>Bottlers' franchise rights with indefinite lives</td><td>7,405</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><td>Trademarks with indefinite lives</td><td>6,527</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>Definite-lived intangible assets, net</td><td>1,039</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>Other intangible assets not subject to amortization</td><td>111</td><td>*</td></tr><tr><td>Total</td><td>$27,337</td><td>32%</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td></td><td colspan="2">Year Ended December 31,</td><td colspan="4">Percentage Change in Revenue</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>2017</td><td>2016</td><td>Organic</td><td>Acquisition</td><td>Foreign Exchange</td><td>Total Change</td></tr><tr><td>Parts & services revenue</td><td>$9,208,634</td><td>$8,144,645</td><td>4.1%</td><td>9.1%</td><td>-0.1%</td><td>13.1%</td></tr><tr><td>Other revenue</td><td>528,275</td><td>439,386</td><td>19.6%</td><td>0.7%</td><td>0.0%</td><td>20.2%</td></tr><tr><td>Total revenue</td><td>$9,736,909</td><td>$8,584,031</td><td>4.9%</td><td>8.7%</td><td>-0.1%</td><td>13.4%</td></tr></table>
<table><tr><td></td><td colspan="2">Years Ended December 31,</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td><td>Change</td><td>% Change</td></tr><tr><td></td><td colspan="3">(In millions)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td> Operating Revenues</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Premiums</td><td>$2,683</td><td>$1,265</td><td>$1,418</td><td>112.1%</td></tr><tr><td>Universal life and investment-type product policy fees</td><td>227</td><td>189</td><td>38</td><td>20.1%</td></tr><tr><td>Net investment income</td><td>5,874</td><td>6,636</td><td>-762</td><td>-11.5%</td></tr><tr><td>Other revenues</td><td>359</td><td>335</td><td>24</td><td>7.2%</td></tr><tr><td>Total operating revenues</td><td>9,143</td><td>8,425</td><td>718</td><td>8.5%</td></tr><tr><td> Operating Expenses</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Policyholder benefits and claims and policyholder dividends</td><td>4,977</td><td>3,365</td><td>1,612</td><td>47.9%</td></tr><tr><td>Interest credited to policyholder account balances</td><td>2,298</td><td>2,723</td><td>-425</td><td>-15.6%</td></tr><tr><td>Capitalization of DAC</td><td>-18</td><td>-25</td><td>7</td><td>28.0%</td></tr><tr><td>Amortization of DAC and VOBA</td><td>29</td><td>38</td><td>-9</td><td>-23.7%</td></tr><tr><td>Interest expense</td><td>2</td><td>6</td><td>-4</td><td>-66.7%</td></tr><tr><td>Other expenses</td><td>476</td><td>477</td><td>-1</td><td>-0.2%</td></tr><tr><td>Total operating expenses</td><td>7,764</td><td>6,584</td><td>1,180</td><td>17.9%</td></tr><tr><td>Provision for income tax expense (benefit)</td><td>466</td><td>631</td><td>-165</td><td>-26.1%</td></tr><tr><td>Operating earnings</td><td>$913</td><td>$1,210</td><td>$-297</td><td>-24.5%</td></tr></table>

Question: what was the percentage change in the goodwill in 2010 as a result of the hewitt acquisition .
Answer: 0.40984
Reasoning program: subtract(8.6,6.1), divide(#0,6.1)