bevaya/FinQA huggingface dataset:
stockholder return performance graphs the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2007 and tracks it through december 29 , 2012 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/29/1212/31/111/1/111/2/101/3/0912/29/07 *$ 100 invested on 12/29/07 in stock or 12/31/07 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved. .

Table: 12/29/2007 1/3/2009 1/2/2010 1/1/2011 12/31/2011 12/29/2012 cadence design systems inc . 100.00 22.55 35.17 48.50 61.07 78.92 nasdaq composite 100.00 59.03 82.25 97.32 98.63 110.78 s&p 400 information technology 100.00 54.60 82.76 108.11 95.48 109.88

the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .

Question: what is the roi of nasdaq composite from 2008 to 2012?
Answer: 10.8%
Calculation: divide(subtract(110.78, const_100), const_100)
the following performance graph shows the cumulative total return to a holder of the company 2019s common stock , assuming dividend reinvestment , compared with the cumulative total return , assuming dividend reinvestment , of the standard & poor ( "s&p" ) 500 index and the dow jones us financials index during the period from december 31 , 2009 through december 31 , 2014. .

Table: 12/09 12/10 12/11 12/12 12/13 12/14 e*trade financial corporation 100.00 90.91 45.23 50.85 111.59 137.81 s&p 500 index 100.00 115.06 117.49 136.30 180.44 205.14 dow jones us financials index 100.00 112.72 98.24 124.62 167.26 191.67

table of contents .

Question: what was the ratio of the s&p index to the e*trade financial corporation cumulative total return to a holder of the company 2019s common stock compared as of 2014
Answer: 1.5
Calculation: divide(205.14, 137.81)
Explanation: as of 2014 the cumulative value of the common stock of the s&p index was 1.5 times the e*trade financial corporation
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our common stock on the new york stock exchange ( 201cnyse 201d ) for the years 2010 and 2009. .

Table: 2010 high low quarter ended march 31 $ 44.61 $ 40.10 quarter ended june 30 45.33 38.86 quarter ended september 30 52.11 43.70 quarter ended december 31 53.14 49.61 2009 high low quarter ended march 31 $ 32.53 $ 25.45 quarter ended june 30 34.52 27.93 quarter ended september 30 37.71 29.89 quarter ended december 31 43.84 35.03

on february 11 , 2011 , the closing price of our common stock was $ 56.73 per share as reported on the nyse . as of february 11 , 2011 , we had 397612895 outstanding shares of common stock and 463 registered holders . dividends we have not historically paid a dividend on our common stock . payment of dividends in the future , when , as and if authorized by our board of directors , would depend upon many factors , including our earnings and financial condition , restrictions under applicable law and our current and future loan agreements , our debt service requirements , our capital expenditure requirements and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant from time to time , including the potential determination to elect reit status . in addition , the loan agreement for our revolving credit facility and term loan contain covenants that generally restrict our ability to pay dividends unless certain financial covenants are satisfied . for more information about the restrictions under the loan agreement for the revolving credit facility and term loan , our notes indentures and the loan agreement related to our securitization , see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources 2014factors affecting sources of liquidity 201d and note 6 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. .

Question: what is the average number of shares per registered holder as of february 11 , 2011?
Answer: 858775
Calculation: divide(397612895, 463)
the following performance graph shows the cumulative total return to a holder of the company 2019s common stock , assuming dividend reinvestment , compared with the cumulative total return , assuming dividend reinvestment , of the standard & poor ( "s&p" ) 500 index and the dow jones us financials index during the period from december 31 , 2009 through december 31 , 2014. .

Table: 12/09 12/10 12/11 12/12 12/13 12/14 e*trade financial corporation 100.00 90.91 45.23 50.85 111.59 137.81 s&p 500 index 100.00 115.06 117.49 136.30 180.44 205.14 dow jones us financials index 100.00 112.72 98.24 124.62 167.26 191.67

table of contents .

Question: what was the percent of the return on the e*trade financial corporation common stock from 2009 to 2014
Answer: 37.81%
Calculation: divide(subtract(137.81, const_100), const_100)
Explanation: the cumulative value of the the e*trade financial corporation common stock from 2009 to 2014 increased by 37.81%
five-year performance comparison 2013 the following graph provides an indicator of cumulative total shareholder returns for the corporation as compared to the peer group index ( described above ) , the dj trans , and the s&p 500 . the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested in the common stock of union pacific corporation and each index on december 31 , 2006 and that all dividends were reinvested . purchases of equity securities 2013 during 2011 , we repurchased 15340810 shares of our common stock at an average price of $ 96.08 . the following table presents common stock repurchases during each month for the fourth quarter of 2011 : period total number of shares purchased [a] average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announced plan or program [b] maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plan or program [b] .

Table: period total number ofsharespurchased [a] averageprice paidper share total number of sharespurchased as part ofapublicly announced planor program [b] maximum number ofshares that may yetbe purchased under the planor program [b] oct . 1 through oct . 31 379488 87.46 371639 31370427 nov . 1 through nov . 30 1748964 98.41 1733877 29636550 dec . 1 through dec . 31 1787343 100.26 1780142 27856408 total 3915795 $ 98.19 3885658 n/a

[a] total number of shares purchased during the quarter includes approximately 30137 shares delivered or attested to upc by employees to pay stock option exercise prices , satisfy excess tax withholding obligations for stock option exercises or vesting of retention units , and pay withholding obligations for vesting of retention shares . [b] on april 1 , 2011 , our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to 40 million shares of our common stock by march 31 , 2014 . these repurchases may be made on the open market or through other transactions . our management has sole discretion with respect to determining the timing and amount of these transactions. .

Question: for the 4th quarter of 2011 approximately how much was spent on stock repurchases?
Answer: 384491910
Calculation: multiply(3915795, 98.19)
entergy mississippi , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis 2010 compared to 2009 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2010 to 2009 . amount ( in millions ) .

Table: amount ( in millions ) 2009 net revenue $ 536.7 volume/weather 18.9 other -0.3 ( 0.3 ) 2010 net revenue $ 555.3

the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 1046 gwh , or 8% ( 8 % ) , in billed electricity usage in all sectors , primarily due to the effect of more favorable weather on the residential sector . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges ( credits ) gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 22 million in power management rider revenue as the result of higher rates , the volume/weather variance discussed above , and an increase in grand gulf rider revenue as a result of higher rates and increased usage , offset by a decrease of $ 23.5 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to lower fuel rates . fuel and purchased power expenses decreased primarily due to a decrease in deferred fuel expense as a result of prior over-collections , offset by an increase in the average market price of purchased power coupled with increased net area demand . other regulatory charges increased primarily due to increased recovery of costs associated with the power management recovery rider . other income statement variances 2011 compared to 2010 other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to : a $ 5.4 million decrease in compensation and benefits costs primarily resulting from an increase in the accrual for incentive-based compensation in 2010 and a decrease in stock option expense ; and the sale of $ 4.9 million of surplus oil inventory . the decrease was partially offset by an increase of $ 3.9 million in legal expenses due to the deferral in 2010 of certain litigation expenses in accordance with regulatory treatment . taxes other than income taxes increased primarily due to an increase in ad valorem taxes due to a higher 2011 assessment as compared to 2010 , partially offset by higher capitalized property taxes as compared with prior year . depreciation and amortization expenses increased primarily due to an increase in plant in service . interest expense decreased primarily due to a revision caused by ferc 2019s acceptance of a change in the treatment of funds received from independent power producers for transmission interconnection projects. .

Question: what was the percentage change in net revenue in 2011
Answer: 3.5%
Calculation: add(add(18.9, -0.3), 536.7)
performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 65691 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2018 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2017 . the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2012 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested . comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials .

Table: date citi s&p 500 s&p financials 31-dec-2012 100.0 100.0 100.0 31-dec-2013 131.8 132.4 135.6 31-dec-2014 137.0 150.5 156.2 31-dec-2015 131.4 152.6 153.9 31-dec-2016 152.3 170.8 188.9 31-dec-2017 193.5 208.1 230.9

.

Question: as of 2017 what was the ratio of the overall five-year cumulative total return for s&p 500 compared to citi
Answer: 1.16
Calculation: divide(subtract(208.1, const_100), subtract(193.5, const_100))
Explanation: as of 2017 there was $ 1.16 for five-year cumulative total return for each $ 1 of citi
jpmorgan chase & co./2014 annual report 63 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co . ( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index . the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced u.s . equity benchmark consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s . and is composed of 24 leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts . the s&p financial index is an index of 85 financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 . the firm is a component of all three industry indices . the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2009 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices . the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested . december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 .

Table: december 31 ( in dollars ) 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 jpmorgan chase $ 100.00 $ 102.30 $ 81.87 $ 111.49 $ 152.42 $ 167.48 kbw bank index 100.00 123.36 94.75 125.91 173.45 189.69 s&p financial index 100.00 112.13 93.00 119.73 162.34 186.98 s&p 500 index 100.00 115.06 117.48 136.27 180.39 205.07

.

Question: based o n the review of the simultaneous investments of the jpmorgan chase common stock in the various index what was the ratio of the performance in the kbw bank index to the s&p financial index in 2010
Answer: 1.1
Calculation: divide(123.36, 112.13)
entergy new orleans , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) .

Table: amount ( in millions ) 2007 net revenue $ 231.0 volume/weather 15.5 net gas revenue 6.6 rider revenue 3.9 base revenue -11.3 ( 11.3 ) other 7.0 2008 net revenue $ 252.7

the volume/weather variance is due to an increase in electricity usage in the service territory in 2008 compared to the same period in 2007 . entergy new orleans estimates that approximately 141000 electric customers and 93000 gas customers have returned since hurricane katrina and are taking service as of december 31 , 2008 , compared to approximately 132000 electric customers and 86000 gas customers as of december 31 , 2007 . billed retail electricity usage increased a total of 184 gwh compared to the same period in 2007 , an increase of 4% ( 4 % ) . the net gas revenue variance is primarily due to an increase in base rates in march and november 2007 . refer to note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the base rate increase . the rider revenue variance is due primarily to higher total revenue and a storm reserve rider effective march 2007 as a result of the city council's approval of a settlement agreement in october 2006 . the approved storm reserve has been set to collect $ 75 million over a ten-year period through the rider and the funds will be held in a restricted escrow account . the settlement agreement is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements . the base revenue variance is primarily due to a base rate recovery credit , effective january 2008 . the base rate credit is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements . gross operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : an increase of $ 58.9 million in gross wholesale revenue due to increased sales to affiliated customers and an increase in the average price of energy available for resale sales ; an increase of $ 47.7 million in electric fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates and increased electricity usage ; and an increase of $ 22 million in gross gas revenues due to higher fuel recovery revenues and increases in gas base rates in march 2007 and november 2007 . fuel and purchased power increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power in addition to an increase in demand. .

Question: what is the net change in net revenue during 2008?
Answer: 21.7
Calculation: subtract(252.7, 231.0)
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis the decrease in interest income in 2002 was primarily due to : fffd interest recognized in 2001 on grand gulf 1's decommissioning trust funds resulting from the final order addressing system energy's rate proceeding ; fffd interest recognized in 2001 at entergy mississippi and entergy new orleans on the deferred system energy costs that were not being recovered through rates ; and fffd lower interest earned on declining deferred fuel balances . the decrease in interest charges in 2002 is primarily due to : fffd a decrease of $ 31.9 million in interest on long-term debt primarily due to the retirement of long-term debt in late 2001 and early 2002 ; and fffd a decrease of $ 76.0 million in other interest expense primarily due to interest recorded on system energy's reserve for rate refund in 2001 . the refund was made in december 2001 . 2001 compared to 2000 results for the year ended december 31 , 2001 for u.s . utility were also affected by an increase in interest charges of $ 61.5 million primarily due to : fffd the final ferc order addressing the 1995 system energy rate filing ; fffd debt issued at entergy arkansas in july 2001 , at entergy gulf states in june 2000 and august 2001 , at entergy mississippi in january 2001 , and at entergy new orleans in july 2000 and february 2001 ; and fffd borrowings under credit facilities during 2001 , primarily at entergy arkansas . non-utility nuclear the increase in earnings in 2002 for non-utility nuclear from $ 128 million to $ 201 million was primarily due to the operation of indian point 2 and vermont yankee , which were purchased in september 2001 and july 2002 , respectively . the increase in earnings in 2001 for non-utility nuclear from $ 49 million to $ 128 million was primarily due to the operation of fitzpatrick and indian point 3 for a full year , as each was purchased in november 2000 , and the operation of indian point 2 , which was purchased in september 2001 . following are key performance measures for non-utility nuclear: .

Table: 2002 2001 2000 net mw in operation at december 31 3955 3445 2475 generation in gwh for the year 29953 22614 7171 capacity factor for the year 93% ( 93 % ) 93% ( 93 % ) 94% ( 94 % )

2002 compared to 2001 the following fluctuations in the results of operations for non-utility nuclear in 2002 were primarily caused by the acquisitions of indian point 2 and vermont yankee ( except as otherwise noted ) : fffd operating revenues increased $ 411.0 million to $ 1.2 billion ; fffd other operation and maintenance expenses increased $ 201.8 million to $ 596.3 million ; fffd depreciation and amortization expenses increased $ 25.1 million to $ 42.8 million ; fffd fuel expenses increased $ 29.4 million to $ 105.2 million ; fffd nuclear refueling outage expenses increased $ 23.9 million to $ 46.8 million , which was due primarily to a .

Question: what is the percent change in operating revenues from 2001 to 2002?
Answer: 192%
Calculation: divide(subtract(multiply(1.2, const_1000), 411.0), 411.0)
included in the corporate and consumer loan tables above are purchased distressed loans , which are loans that have evidenced significant credit deterioration subsequent to origination but prior to acquisition by citigroup . in accordance with sop 03-3 , the difference between the total expected cash flows for these loans and the initial recorded investments is recognized in income over the life of the loans using a level yield . accordingly , these loans have been excluded from the impaired loan information presented above . in addition , per sop 03-3 , subsequent decreases to the expected cash flows for a purchased distressed loan require a build of an allowance so the loan retains its level yield . however , increases in the expected cash flows are first recognized as a reduction of any previously established allowance and then recognized as income prospectively over the remaining life of the loan by increasing the loan 2019s level yield . where the expected cash flows cannot be reliably estimated , the purchased distressed loan is accounted for under the cost recovery method . the carrying amount of the company 2019s purchased distressed loan portfolio at december 31 , 2010 was $ 392 million , net of an allowance of $ 77 million as of december 31 , 2010 . the changes in the accretable yield , related allowance and carrying amount net of accretable yield for 2010 are as follows : in millions of dollars accretable carrying amount of loan receivable allowance .

Table: in millions of dollars accretable yield carrying amount of loan receivable allowance beginning balance $ 27 $ 920 $ 95 purchases ( 1 ) 1 130 2014 disposals/payments received -11 ( 11 ) -594 ( 594 ) 2014 accretion -44 ( 44 ) 44 2014 builds ( reductions ) to the allowance 128 2014 -18 ( 18 ) increase to expected cash flows -2 ( 2 ) 19 2014 fx/other 17 -50 ( 50 ) 2014 balance at december 31 2010 ( 2 ) $ 116 $ 469 $ 77

( 1 ) the balance reported in the column 201ccarrying amount of loan receivable 201d consists of $ 130 million of purchased loans accounted for under the level-yield method and $ 0 under the cost-recovery method . these balances represent the fair value of these loans at their acquisition date . the related total expected cash flows for the level-yield loans were $ 131 million at their acquisition dates . ( 2 ) the balance reported in the column 201ccarrying amount of loan receivable 201d consists of $ 315 million of loans accounted for under the level-yield method and $ 154 million accounted for under the cost-recovery method. .

Question: at december 31 , 2010 what was the percent of the net allowance to the the carrying amount of the company 2019s purchased distressed loan portfolio
Answer: 19.6%
Calculation: divide(77, 392)