bevaya/FinQA huggingface dataset:
performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock with the cumulative total return for the same period of pmi's peer group and the s&p 500 index . the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 as of december 31 , 2013 , in pmi common stock ( at prices quoted on the new york stock exchange ) and each of the indices as of the market close and reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis . date pmi pmi peer group ( 1 ) s&p 500 index .

Table: date pmi pmi peer group ( 1 ) s&p 500 index december 31 2013 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 december 31 2014 $ 97.90 $ 107.80 $ 113.70 december 31 2015 $ 111.00 $ 116.80 $ 115.30 december 31 2016 $ 120.50 $ 118.40 $ 129.00 december 31 2017 $ 144.50 $ 140.50 $ 157.20 december 31 2018 $ 96.50 $ 127.70 $ 150.30

( 1 ) the pmi peer group presented in this graph is the same as that used in the prior year . the pmi peer group was established based on a review of four characteristics : global presence ; a focus on consumer products ; and net revenues and a market capitalization of a similar size to those of pmi . the review also considered the primary international tobacco companies . as a result of this review , the following companies constitute the pmi peer group : altria group , inc. , anheuser-busch inbev sa/nv , british american tobacco p.l.c. , the coca-cola company , colgate-palmolive co. , diageo plc , heineken n.v. , imperial brands plc , japan tobacco inc. , johnson & johnson , kimberly-clark corporation , the kraft-heinz company , mcdonald's corp. , mondel z international , inc. , nestl e9 s.a. , pepsico , inc. , the procter & gamble company , roche holding ag , and unilever nv and plc . note : figures are rounded to the nearest $ 0.10. .

Question: what was the percentage return for pmi common stock for the five years ended 2018?
Answer: -3.5%
Calculation: divide(subtract(96.50, const_100), const_100)
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates it by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2001 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and the class b common stock of united parcel service , inc . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 $ 180.00 $ 200.00 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 s&p 500 ups dj transport .

Table: 12/31/01 12/31/02 12/31/03 12/31/04 12/31/05 12/31/06 united parcel service inc . $ 100.00 $ 117.19 $ 140.49 $ 163.54 $ 146.35 $ 148.92 s&p 500 index $ 100.00 $ 77.90 $ 100.24 $ 111.15 $ 116.61 $ 135.02 dow jones transportation average $ 100.00 $ 88.52 $ 116.70 $ 149.06 $ 166.42 $ 182.76

securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans the following table provides information as of december 31 , 2006 regarding compensation plans under which our class a common stock is authorized for issuance . these plans do not authorize the issuance of our class b common stock. .

Question: for the five years ended 12/31/2006 what is the performance difference of the class b common stock of united parcel service , inc . and the dow jones transportation average?
Answer: -33.84%
Calculation: subtract(subtract(148.92, const_100), subtract(182.76, const_100))
entergy louisiana , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory credits gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : 2022 an increase of $ 98.0 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates ; and 2022 an increase due to volume/weather , as discussed above . the increase was partially offset by the following : 2022 a decrease of $ 31.9 million in the price applied to unbilled sales , as discussed above ; 2022 a decrease of $ 12.2 million in rate refund provisions , as discussed above ; and 2022 a decrease of $ 5.2 million in gross wholesale revenue due to decreased sales to affiliated systems . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to : 2022 an increase in the recovery from customers of deferred fuel costs ; and 2022 an increase in the market price of natural gas . other regulatory credits increased primarily due to : 2022 the deferral in 2004 of $ 14.3 million of capacity charges related to generation resource planning as allowed by the lpsc ; 2022 the amortization in 2003 of $ 11.8 million of deferred capacity charges , as discussed above ; and 2022 the deferral in 2004 of $ 11.4 million related to entergy's voluntary severance program , in accordance with a proposed stipulation with the lpsc staff . 2003 compared to 2002 net revenue , which is entergy louisiana's measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2003 to 2002. .

Table: ( in millions ) 2002 net revenue $ 922.9 deferred fuel cost revisions 59.1 asset retirement obligation 8.2 volume -16.2 ( 16.2 ) vidalia settlement -9.2 ( 9.2 ) other 8.9 2003 net revenue $ 973.7

the deferred fuel cost revisions variance resulted from a revised unbilled sales pricing estimate made in december 2002 and a further revision made in the first quarter of 2003 to more closely align the fuel component of that pricing with expected recoverable fuel costs . the asset retirement obligation variance was due to the implementation of sfas 143 , "accounting for asset retirement obligations" adopted in january 2003 . see "critical accounting estimates" for more details on sfas 143 . the increase was offset by decommissioning expense and had no effect on net income . the volume variance was due to a decrease in electricity usage in the service territory . billed usage decreased 1868 gwh in the industrial sector including the loss of a large industrial customer to cogeneration. .

Question: what is the net change in net revenue during 2003 for entergy louisiana , inc.?
Answer: 50.8
Calculation: subtract(973.7, 922.9)
stock performance graph this performance graph shall not be deemed 201cfiled 201d for purposes of section 18 of the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended ( the 201cexchange act 201d ) or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that section and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing of tractor supply company under the securities act of 1933 , as amended , or the exchange act . the following graph compares the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock from december 29 , 2012 to december 30 , 2017 ( the company 2019s fiscal year-end ) , with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index and the s&p retail index over the same period . the comparison assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 29 , 2012 , in our common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and in each case assumes reinvestment of dividends . the historical stock price performance shown on this graph is not indicative of future performance. .

Table: 12/29/2012 12/28/2013 12/27/2014 12/26/2015 12/31/2016 12/30/2017 tractor supply company $ 100.00 $ 174.14 $ 181.29 $ 201.04 $ 179.94 $ 180.52 s&p 500 $ 100.00 $ 134.11 $ 155.24 $ 156.43 $ 173.74 $ 211.67 s&p retail index $ 100.00 $ 147.73 $ 164.24 $ 207.15 $ 219.43 $ 286.13

.

Question: what was the percentage growth in the stock price performance for tractor supply company from 2012 to 2013
Answer: 74.14%
Calculation: divide(subtract(174.14, 100.00), 100.00)
federal realty investment trust schedule iii summary of real estate and accumulated depreciation 2014continued three years ended december 31 , 2005 reconciliation of accumulated depreciation and amortization .

Table: balance december 31 2002 $ 450697000 additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense 68125000 deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property -4645000 ( 4645000 ) balance december 31 2003 514177000 additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense 82551000 deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property -1390000 ( 1390000 ) balance december 31 2004 595338000 additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense 83656000 deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property -15244000 ( 15244000 ) balance december 31 2005 $ 663750000

.

Question: what is the increase observed in the balance at the end of the year during 2005 and 2004?
Answer: 11.49%
Calculation: subtract(divide(663750000, 595338000), const_1)
Explanation: it is the percentual increase observed during this period , which is calculated by dividing the final value ( balance at 2005 ) by the initial value ( balance of 2004 ) , then subtracting 1 and turning it into a percentage .
judgments the valuation of goodwill and other intangible assets depends on a number of factors , including estimates of future market growth and trends , forecasted revenue and costs , expected useful lives of the assets , appropriate discount rates and other variables . goodwill is allocated to reporting units , which are components of the business that are one level below operating segments . each of these reporting units is tested for impairment individually during the annual evaluation . there is no goodwill assigned to reporting units within the balance sheet management segment . the following table shows the amount of goodwill allocated to each of the reporting units in the trading and investing segment ( dollars in millions ) : .

Table: reporting unit december 31 2011 u.s . brokerage $ 1751.2 capital markets 142.4 retail bank 40.6 total goodwill $ 1934.2

in connection with our annual impairment test of goodwill , we concluded that the goodwill was not impaired as the fair value of the reporting units was in excess of the book value of those reporting units as of december 31 , 2011 . the fair value of the reporting units exceeded the book value of those reporting units by substantial amounts ( fair value as a percent of book value ranged from approximately 150% ( 150 % ) to 700% ( 700 % ) ) and therefore did not indicate a significant risk of goodwill impairment based on current projections and valuations . we also evaluate the remaining useful lives on intangible assets each reporting period to determine whether events and circumstances warrant a revision to the remaining period of amortization . effects if actual results differ if our estimates of fair value for the reporting units change due to changes in our business or other factors , we may determine that an impairment charge is necessary . estimates of fair value are determined based on a complex model using cash flows and company comparisons . if management 2019s estimates of future cash flows are inaccurate , the fair value determined could be inaccurate and impairment would not be recognized in a timely manner . intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives . if changes in the estimated underlying revenue occur , impairment or a change in the remaining life may need to be recognized. .

Question: as of december 31 , what was percent of the capital markets goodwill to the total
Answer: 7.4%
Calculation: divide(142.4, 1934.2)
Explanation: as of december 312011 the total goodwill was made up of 7.4% capital markets goodwill
as of february 15 , 2008 , there were 138311810 shares of our common stock outstanding held by approximately 2979 stockholders of record . dividends and distributions we pay regular quarterly dividends to holders of our common stock . on february 13 , 2008 , our board of directors declared the first quarterly installment of our 2008 dividend in the amount of $ 0.5125 per share , payable on march 28 , 2008 to stockholders of record on march 6 , 2008 . we expect to distribute 100% ( 100 % ) or more of our taxable net income to our stockholders for 2008 . our board of directors normally makes decisions regarding the frequency and amount of our dividends on a quarterly basis . because the board considers a number of factors when making these decisions , we cannot assure you that we will maintain the policy stated above . please see 201ccautionary statements 201d and the risk factors included in part i , item 1a of this annual report on form 10-k for a description of other factors that may affect our distribution policy . our stockholders may reinvest all or a portion of any cash distribution on their shares of our common stock by participating in our distribution reinvestment and stock purchase plan , subject to the terms of the plan . see 201cnote 16 2014capital stock 201d of the notes to consolidated financial statements included in part ii , item 8 of this annual report on form 10-k . director and employee stock sales certain of our directors , executive officers and other employees have adopted and may , from time to time in the future , adopt non-discretionary , written trading plans that comply with rule 10b5-1 under the exchange act , or otherwise monetize their equity-based compensation . stock repurchases the table below summarizes repurchases of our common stock made during the quarter ended december 31 , 2007 : number of shares repurchased ( 1 ) average price per .

Table: number of shares repurchased ( 1 ) average price per share october 1 through october 31 2014 2014 november 1 through november 30 2014 2014 december 1 through december 31 14669 $ 43.89

( 1 ) repurchases represent shares withheld to pay taxes on the vesting of restricted stock granted to employees. .

Question: what was the value of the treasury stock as of december 312007
Answer: 643822.11
Calculation: multiply(14669, 43.89)
Explanation: the value of the treasury stock is the amount of shares bought back at the given price
five-year performance comparison 2013 the following graph provides an indicator of cumulative total shareholder returns for the corporation as compared to the peer group index ( described above ) , the dj trans , and the s&p 500 . the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested in the common stock of union pacific corporation and each index on december 31 , 2006 and that all dividends were reinvested . purchases of equity securities 2013 during 2011 , we repurchased 15340810 shares of our common stock at an average price of $ 96.08 . the following table presents common stock repurchases during each month for the fourth quarter of 2011 : period total number of shares purchased [a] average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announced plan or program [b] maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plan or program [b] .

Table: period total number ofsharespurchased [a] averageprice paidper share total number of sharespurchased as part ofapublicly announced planor program [b] maximum number ofshares that may yetbe purchased under the planor program [b] oct . 1 through oct . 31 379488 87.46 371639 31370427 nov . 1 through nov . 30 1748964 98.41 1733877 29636550 dec . 1 through dec . 31 1787343 100.26 1780142 27856408 total 3915795 $ 98.19 3885658 n/a

[a] total number of shares purchased during the quarter includes approximately 30137 shares delivered or attested to upc by employees to pay stock option exercise prices , satisfy excess tax withholding obligations for stock option exercises or vesting of retention units , and pay withholding obligations for vesting of retention shares . [b] on april 1 , 2011 , our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to 40 million shares of our common stock by march 31 , 2014 . these repurchases may be made on the open market or through other transactions . our management has sole discretion with respect to determining the timing and amount of these transactions. .

Question: for all of 2011 , approximately how much was spent on stock repurchases?
Answer: 14739445000
Calculation: multiply(15340810, 96.08)
performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock with the cumulative total return for the same period of pmi's peer group and the s&p 500 index . the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 as of december 31 , 2013 , in pmi common stock ( at prices quoted on the new york stock exchange ) and each of the indices as of the market close and reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis . date pmi pmi peer group ( 1 ) s&p 500 index .

Table: date pmi pmi peer group ( 1 ) s&p 500 index december 31 2013 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 december 31 2014 $ 97.90 $ 107.80 $ 113.70 december 31 2015 $ 111.00 $ 116.80 $ 115.30 december 31 2016 $ 120.50 $ 118.40 $ 129.00 december 31 2017 $ 144.50 $ 140.50 $ 157.20 december 31 2018 $ 96.50 $ 127.70 $ 150.30

( 1 ) the pmi peer group presented in this graph is the same as that used in the prior year . the pmi peer group was established based on a review of four characteristics : global presence ; a focus on consumer products ; and net revenues and a market capitalization of a similar size to those of pmi . the review also considered the primary international tobacco companies . as a result of this review , the following companies constitute the pmi peer group : altria group , inc. , anheuser-busch inbev sa/nv , british american tobacco p.l.c. , the coca-cola company , colgate-palmolive co. , diageo plc , heineken n.v. , imperial brands plc , japan tobacco inc. , johnson & johnson , kimberly-clark corporation , the kraft-heinz company , mcdonald's corp. , mondel z international , inc. , nestl e9 s.a. , pepsico , inc. , the procter & gamble company , roche holding ag , and unilever nv and plc . note : figures are rounded to the nearest $ 0.10. .

Question: what is the roi of an investment in pmi from 2013 to 2014?
Answer: 2.1%
Calculation: divide(subtract(97.90, const_100), const_100)
stock price performance the following graph shows a comparison of the cumulative total return on our common stock , the standard & poor's 500 index and the standard & poor's 500 retail index . the graph assumes that the value of an investment in our common stock and in each such index was $ 100 on december 30 , 2006 , and that any dividends have been reinvested . the comparison in the graph below is based solely on historical data and is not intended to forecast the possible future performance of our common stock . comparison of cumulative total return among advance auto parts , inc. , s&p 500 index and s&p 500 retail index company/index advance auto parts s&p 500 index s&p retail index december 30 , $ 100.00 100.00 100.00 december 29 , $ 108.00 104.24 january 3 , $ 97.26 january 2 , $ 116.01 january 1 , $ 190.41 101.84 december 31 , $ 201.18 104.81 .

Table: company/index december 30 2006 december 29 2007 january 3 2009 january 2 2010 january 1 2011 december 31 2011 advance auto parts $ 100.00 $ 108.00 $ 97.26 $ 116.01 $ 190.41 $ 201.18 s&p 500 index 100.00 104.24 65.70 78.62 88.67 88.67 s&p retail index 100.00 82.15 58.29 82.36 101.84 104.81

stock price performance the following graph shows a comparison of the cumulative total return on our common stock , the standard & poor's 500 index and the standard & poor's 500 retail index . the graph assumes that the value of an investment in our common stock and in each such index was $ 100 on december 30 , 2006 , and that any dividends have been reinvested . the comparison in the graph below is based solely on historical data and is not intended to forecast the possible future performance of our common stock . comparison of cumulative total return among advance auto parts , inc. , s&p 500 index and s&p 500 retail index company/index advance auto parts s&p 500 index s&p retail index december 30 , $ 100.00 100.00 100.00 december 29 , $ 108.00 104.24 january 3 , $ 97.26 january 2 , $ 116.01 january 1 , $ 190.41 101.84 december 31 , $ 201.18 104.81 .

Question: what is the roi of an investment in advance auto parts from 2006 to january 3 , 2009?
Answer: -2.7%
Calculation: divide(subtract(97.26, const_100), const_100)
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the term of the economic rights agreement is seventy years ; however , tv azteca has the right to purchase , at fair market value , the economic rights from the company at any time during the last fifty years of the agreement . should tv azteca elect to purchase the economic rights ( in whole or in part ) , it would also be obligated to repay a proportional amount of the loan discussed above at the time of such election . the company 2019s obligation to pay tv azteca $ 1.5 million annually would also be reduced proportionally . the company has accounted for the annual payment of $ 1.5 million as a capital lease ( initially recording an asset and a corresponding liability of approximately $ 18.6 million ) . the capital lease asset and the discount on the note , which aggregate approximately $ 30.2 million , represent the cost to acquire the economic rights and are being amortized over the seventy-year life of the economic rights agreement . on a quarterly basis , the company assesses the recoverability of its note receivable from tv azteca . as of december 31 , 2005 and 2004 , the company has assessed the recoverability of the note receivable from tv azteca and concluded that no adjustment to its carrying value is required . an executive officer and former director of the company served as a director of tv azteca from december 1999 to february 2006 . as of december 31 , 2005 and 2004 , the company also had other long-term notes receivable outstanding of approximately $ 11.1 million and $ 11.2 million , respectively . 7 . financing arrangements outstanding amounts under the company 2019s long-term financing arrangements consisted of the following as of december 31 , ( in thousands ) : .

Table: 2005 2004 american tower credit facility $ 793000 $ 698000 spectrasite credit facility 700000 senior subordinated notes 400000 400000 senior subordinated discount notes net of discount and warrant valuation 160252 303755 senior notes net of discount and premium 726754 1001817 convertible notes net of discount 773058 830056 notes payable and capital leases 60365 59986 total 3613429 3293614 less current portion of other long-term obligations -162153 ( 162153 ) -138386 ( 138386 ) long-term debt $ 3451276 $ 3155228

new credit facilities 2014in october 2005 , the company refinanced the two existing credit facilities of its principal operating subsidiaries . the company replaced the existing american tower $ 1.1 billion senior secured credit facility with a new $ 1.3 billion senior secured credit facility and replaced the existing spectrasite $ 900.0 million senior secured credit facility with a new $ 1.15 billion senior secured credit facility . as a result of the repayment of the previous credit facilities , the company recorded a net loss on retirement of long-term obligations of $ 9.8 million in the fourth quarter of 2005. .

Question: what percentage of long-term financing was classified as current at the end of 2005?
Answer: 4%
Calculation: divide(162153, 3613429)