bevaya/FinQA huggingface dataset:
equity compensation plan information the following table presents the equity securities available for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2017 . equity compensation plan information plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 1 ) weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 448859 $ 0.00 4087587 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 2 ) 2014 2014 2014 .

Table: plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( 1 ) ( a ) ( b ) weighted-average exercise price of outstanding optionswarrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securitiesreflected in column ( a ) ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 448859 $ 0.00 4087587 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 2 ) 2014 2014 2014 total 448859 $ 0.00 4087587

( 1 ) includes grants made under the huntington ingalls industries , inc . 2012 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2012 plan" ) , which was approved by our stockholders on may 2 , 2012 , and the huntington ingalls industries , inc . 2011 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2011 plan" ) , which was approved by the sole stockholder of hii prior to its spin-off from northrop grumman corporation . of these shares , 27123 were stock rights granted under the 2011 plan . in addition , this number includes 28763 stock rights , 3075 restricted stock rights , and 389898 restricted performance stock rights granted under the 2012 plan , assuming target performance achievement . ( 2 ) there are no awards made under plans not approved by security holders . item 13 . certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence information as to certain relationships and related transactions and director independence will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders , to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year . item 14 . principal accountant fees and services information as to principal accountant fees and services will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders , to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year. .

Question: what portion of the equity compensation plan approved by security holders remains available for future issuance?
Answer: 90.1%
Calculation: divide(4087587, add(448859, 4087587))
notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 6 2014income taxes ( continued ) a reconciliation of the provision for income taxes , with the amount computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate ( 35% ( 35 % ) in 2005 , 2004 , and 2003 ) to income before provision for income taxes , is as follows ( in millions ) : .

Table: 2005 2004 2003 computed expected tax $ 636 $ 134 $ 32 state taxes net of federal effect -19 ( 19 ) -5 ( 5 ) -4 ( 4 ) indefinitely invested earnings of foreign subsidiaries -98 ( 98 ) -31 ( 31 ) -13 ( 13 ) nondeductible executive compensation 11 10 5 research and development credit net -26 ( 26 ) -5 ( 5 ) -7 ( 7 ) other items -24 ( 24 ) 4 11 provision for income taxes $ 480 $ 107 $ 24 effective tax rate 26% ( 26 % ) 28% ( 28 % ) 26% ( 26 % )

during 2005 , the company reversed certain tax contingency reserves and recorded a corresponding benefit to income tax expense primarily as a result of a change in the estimated outcome of certain tax disputes . additionally , during the fourth quarter of 2005 , the company recorded a benefit to tax expense to adjust its net deferred tax assets as a result of the company 2019s year-end review of its deferred tax accounts , the impact of which was not material to the current or prior periods 2019 results of operations . the total benefit to income tax expense from the reversal of these tax contingency reserves and adjustments to net deferred tax assets was $ 67 million . the company also recorded a $ 14 million credit to income tax expense resulting from a reduction of the valuation allowance . the internal revenue service ( irs ) has completed its field audit of the company 2019s federal income tax returns for all years prior to 2002 and proposed certain adjustments . certain of these adjustments are being contested through the irs appeals office . substantially all irs audit issues for these years have been resolved . in addition , the company is also subject to audits by state , local , and foreign tax authorities . management believes that adequate provisions have been made for any adjustments that may result from tax examinations . however , the outcome of tax audits cannot be predicted with certainty . should any issues addressed in the company 2019s tax audits be resolved in a manner not consistent with management 2019s expectations , the company could be required to adjust its provision for income tax in the period such resolution occurs . note 7 2014shareholders 2019 equity preferred stock the company has 5 million shares of authorized preferred stock , none of which is outstanding . under the terms of the company 2019s restated articles of incorporation , the board of directors is authorized to determine or alter the rights , preferences , privileges and restrictions of the company 2019s authorized but unissued shares of preferred stock. .

Question: what was the average effective tax rate for the three year period?
Answer: 26.7
Calculation: table_average(effective tax rate, none)
we have adequate access to capital markets to meet any foreseeable cash requirements , and we have sufficient financial capacity to satisfy our current liabilities . cash flows millions 2014 2013 2012 .

Table: cash flowsmillions 2014 2013 2012 cash provided by operating activities $ 7385 $ 6823 $ 6161 cash used in investing activities -4249 ( 4249 ) -3405 ( 3405 ) -3633 ( 3633 ) cash used in financing activities -2982 ( 2982 ) -3049 ( 3049 ) -2682 ( 2682 ) net change in cash and cashequivalents $ 154 $ 369 $ -154 ( 154 )

operating activities higher net income in 2014 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2013 , despite higher income tax payments . 2014 income tax payments were higher than 2013 primarily due to higher income , but also because we paid taxes previously deferred by bonus depreciation ( discussed below ) . higher net income in 2013 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2012 . in addition , we made payments in 2012 for past wages as a result of national labor negotiations , which reduced cash provided by operating activities in 2012 . lower tax benefits from bonus depreciation ( as discussed below ) partially offset the increases . federal tax law provided for 100% ( 100 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2011 and 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2012-2013 . as a result , the company deferred a substantial portion of its 2011-2013 income tax expense , contributing to the positive operating cash flow in those years . congress extended 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for 2014 , but this extension occurred in december and did not have a significant benefit on our income tax payments during 2014 . investing activities higher capital investments , including the early buyout of the long-term operating lease of our headquarters building for approximately $ 261 million , drove the increase in cash used in investing activities compared to 2013 . significant investments also were made for new locomotives , freight cars and containers , and capacity and commercial facility projects . capital investments in 2014 also included $ 99 million for the early buyout of locomotives and freight cars under long-term operating leases , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions . lower capital investments in locomotives and freight cars in 2013 drove the decrease in cash used in investing activities compared to 2012 . included in capital investments in 2012 was $ 75 million for the early buyout of 165 locomotives under long-term operating and capital leases during the first quarter of 2012 , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions. .

Question: what was the cost per car for the buyout of locomotives in 2012?
Answer: 454545
Calculation: divide(multiply(75, const_1000000), 165)
part ii item 5 2014market for registrant 2019s common equity and related stockholder matters market information . the common stock of the company is currently traded on the new york stock exchange ( nyse ) under the symbol 2018 2018aes . 2019 2019 the following tables set forth the high and low sale prices for the common stock as reported by the nyse for the periods indicated . price range of common stock .

Table: 2002 first quarter high $ 17.84 low $ 4.11 2001 first quarter high $ 60.15 low $ 41.30 second quarter 9.17 3.55 second quarter 52.25 39.95 third quarter 4.61 1.56 third quarter 44.50 12.00 fourth quarter 3.57 0.95 fourth quarter 17.80 11.60

holders . as of march 3 , 2003 , there were 9663 record holders of the company 2019s common stock , par value $ 0.01 per share . dividends . under the terms of the company 2019s senior secured credit facilities entered into with a commercial bank syndicate , the company is not allowed to pay cash dividends . in addition , the company is precluded from paying cash dividends on its common stock under the terms of a guaranty to the utility customer in connection with the aes thames project in the event certain net worth and liquidity tests of the company are not met . the ability of the company 2019s project subsidiaries to declare and pay cash dividends to the company is subject to certain limitations in the project loans , governmental provisions and other agreements entered into by such project subsidiaries . securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans . see the information contained under the caption 2018 2018securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans 2019 2019 of the proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders of the registrant to be held on may 1 , 2003 , which information is incorporated herein by reference. .

Question: what was the difference in dollars of the high low sale price for the common stock in the third quarter of 2002?
Answer: 3.05
Calculation: subtract(4.61, 1.56)
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates it by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2001 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and the class b common stock of united parcel service , inc . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 $ 180.00 $ 200.00 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 s&p 500 ups dj transport .

Table: 12/31/01 12/31/02 12/31/03 12/31/04 12/31/05 12/31/06 united parcel service inc . $ 100.00 $ 117.19 $ 140.49 $ 163.54 $ 146.35 $ 148.92 s&p 500 index $ 100.00 $ 77.90 $ 100.24 $ 111.15 $ 116.61 $ 135.02 dow jones transportation average $ 100.00 $ 88.52 $ 116.70 $ 149.06 $ 166.42 $ 182.76

securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans the following table provides information as of december 31 , 2006 regarding compensation plans under which our class a common stock is authorized for issuance . these plans do not authorize the issuance of our class b common stock. .

Question: for the five years ended 12/31/2006 what is the performance difference of the class b common stock of united parcel service , inc . and the s&p 500 index?
Answer: 13.9%
Calculation: subtract(subtract(148.92, const_100), subtract(135.02, const_100))
jpmorgan chase & co./2014 annual report 63 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co . ( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index . the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced u.s . equity benchmark consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s . and is composed of 24 leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts . the s&p financial index is an index of 85 financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 . the firm is a component of all three industry indices . the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2009 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices . the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested . december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 .

Table: december 31 ( in dollars ) 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 jpmorgan chase $ 100.00 $ 102.30 $ 81.87 $ 111.49 $ 152.42 $ 167.48 kbw bank index 100.00 123.36 94.75 125.91 173.45 189.69 s&p financial index 100.00 112.13 93.00 119.73 162.34 186.98 s&p 500 index 100.00 115.06 117.48 136.27 180.39 205.07

.

Question: what is the total return of the kbw bank index over the above refernced five year period?
Answer: 89.69%
Calculation: divide(subtract(189.69, const_100), const_100)
repurchase of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of equity securities during the fourth quarter of 2008 : number of shares purchased average paid per share2 total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs .

Table: total number of shares purchased average price paid per share2 total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs maximum number ofshares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs october 1-31 29704 $ 5.99 2014 2014 november 1-30 4468 $ 3.24 2014 2014 december 1-31 12850 $ 3.98 2014 2014 total1 47022 $ 5.18 2014 2014

total1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47022 $ 5.18 2014 2014 1 consists of restricted shares of our common stock withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares during each month of the fourth quarter of 2008 ( the 201cwithheld shares 201d ) . 2 the average price per month of the withheld shares was calculated by dividing the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations for each month by the aggregate number of shares of our common stock withheld each month. .

Question: how much more , in percent , was spent on october shares than november shares?
Answer: 1229%
Calculation: multiply(divide(multiply(29704, 5.99), multiply(4468, 3.24)), const_100)
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters , and issuer purchases of equity securities our common stock is listed on the new york stock exchange under the symbol "apd." as of 31 october 2019 , there were 5166 record holders of our common stock . cash dividends on the company 2019s common stock are paid quarterly . it is our expectation that we will continue to pay cash dividends in the future at comparable or increased levels . the board of directors determines whether to declare dividends and the timing and amount based on financial condition and other factors it deems relevant . dividend information for each quarter of fiscal years 2019 and 2018 is summarized below: .

Table: 2019 2018 first quarter $ 1.10 $ .95 second quarter 1.16 1.10 third quarter 1.16 1.10 fourth quarter 1.16 1.10 total $ 4.58 $ 4.25

purchases of equity securities by the issuer on 15 september 2011 , the board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to $ 1.0 billion of our outstanding common stock . this program does not have a stated expiration date . we repurchase shares pursuant to rules 10b5-1 and 10b-18 under the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended , through repurchase agreements established with one or more brokers . there were no purchases of stock during fiscal year 2019 . at 30 september 2019 , $ 485.3 million in share repurchase authorization remained . additional purchases will be completed at the company 2019s discretion while maintaining sufficient funds for investing in its businesses and growth opportunities. .

Question: what is the increase observed in the first quarter dividend percentage concerning the total value , during 2018 and 2019?
Answer: 1.66%
Calculation: subtract(divide(1.10, 4.58), divide(.95, 4.25))
Explanation: it is the variation between those percentages , which are calculated by dividing the value of the first quarter divided by the total value of dividends .
stock performance graph this performance graph shall not be deemed 201cfiled 201d for purposes of section 18 of the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended ( the 201cexchange act 201d ) or otherwise subject to the liabilities under that section and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing of tractor supply company under the securities act of 1933 , as amended , or the exchange act . the following graph compares the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock from december 28 , 2013 to december 29 , 2018 ( the company 2019s fiscal year-end ) , with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index and the s&p retail index over the same period . the comparison assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 28 , 2013 , in our common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and in each case assumes reinvestment of dividends . the historical stock price performance shown on this graph is not indicative of future performance. .

Table: 12/28/2013 12/27/2014 12/26/2015 12/31/2016 12/30/2017 12/29/2018 tractor supply company $ 100.00 $ 104.11 $ 115.45 $ 103.33 $ 103.67 $ 117.18 s&p 500 $ 100.00 $ 115.76 $ 116.64 $ 129.55 $ 157.84 $ 149.63 s&p retail index $ 100.00 $ 111.18 $ 140.22 $ 148.53 $ 193.68 $ 217.01

.

Question: what was the percentage growth of the stock price performance from 2013 to 2014 for the tractor supply company
Answer: 4.11%
Calculation: divide(subtract(104.11, 100.00), 100.00)
judgments the valuation of goodwill and other intangible assets depends on a number of factors , including estimates of future market growth and trends , forecasted revenue and costs , expected useful lives of the assets , appropriate discount rates and other variables . goodwill is allocated to reporting units , which are components of the business that are one level below operating segments . each of these reporting units is tested for impairment individually during the annual evaluation . there is no goodwill assigned to reporting units within the balance sheet management segment . the following table shows the amount of goodwill allocated to each of the reporting units in the trading and investing segment ( dollars in millions ) : .

Table: reporting unit december 31 2011 u.s . brokerage $ 1751.2 capital markets 142.4 retail bank 40.6 total goodwill $ 1934.2

in connection with our annual impairment test of goodwill , we concluded that the goodwill was not impaired as the fair value of the reporting units was in excess of the book value of those reporting units as of december 31 , 2011 . the fair value of the reporting units exceeded the book value of those reporting units by substantial amounts ( fair value as a percent of book value ranged from approximately 150% ( 150 % ) to 700% ( 700 % ) ) and therefore did not indicate a significant risk of goodwill impairment based on current projections and valuations . we also evaluate the remaining useful lives on intangible assets each reporting period to determine whether events and circumstances warrant a revision to the remaining period of amortization . effects if actual results differ if our estimates of fair value for the reporting units change due to changes in our business or other factors , we may determine that an impairment charge is necessary . estimates of fair value are determined based on a complex model using cash flows and company comparisons . if management 2019s estimates of future cash flows are inaccurate , the fair value determined could be inaccurate and impairment would not be recognized in a timely manner . intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives . if changes in the estimated underlying revenue occur , impairment or a change in the remaining life may need to be recognized. .

Question: what percentage of total goodwill is attributable to u.s . brokerage reporting unit as december 31 , 2011?
Answer: 91%
Calculation: divide(1751.2, 1934.2)
28 2014 annual report performance graph the following chart presents a comparison for the five-year period ended june 30 , 2014 , of the market performance of the company 2019s common stock with the s & p 500 index and an index of peer companies selected by the company : comparison of 5 year cumulative total return among jack henry & associates , inc. , the s&p 500 index , and a peer group the following information depicts a line graph with the following values: .

Table: 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 jkhy 100.00 116.85 148.92 173.67 240.25 307.57 old peer group 100.00 112.45 150.77 176.12 220.42 275.73 new peer group 100.00 115.50 159.31 171.86 198.72 273.95 s & p 500 100.00 114.43 149.55 157.70 190.18 236.98

this comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on june 30 , 2009 , and assumes reinvestments of dividends . total returns are calculated according to market capitalization of peer group members at the beginning of each period . peer companies selected are in the business of providing specialized computer software , hardware and related services to financial institutions and other businesses . in fiscal 2014 , we changed our peer group of companies used for this analysis to maintain alignment with peer companies selected by our compensation committee for use in determining compensation for executive management . companies in the new peer group are aci worldwide , inc. , bottomline technology , inc. , broadridge financial solutions , cardtronics , inc. , convergys corp. , corelogic , inc. , dst systems , inc. , euronet worldwide , inc. , fair isaac corp. , fidelity national information services , inc. , fiserv , inc. , global payments , inc. , heartland payment systems , inc. , micros systems , inc. , moneygram international , inc. , ss&c technologies holdings , inc. , total systems services , inc. , tyler technologies , inc. , verifone systems , inc. , and wex , inc. . companies in the old peer group are aci worldwide , inc. , bottomline technology , inc. , cerner corp. , dst systems , inc. , euronet worldwide , inc. , fair isaac corp. , fidelity national information services , inc. , fiserv , inc. , sei investments company , telecommunications systems , inc. , and tyler technologies corp. .

Question: what was the change in the annual performance of the jkhy stock from 2009 to 2010
Answer: 16.85%
Calculation: divide(subtract(116.85, 100.00), const_100)