bevaya/FinQA huggingface dataset:
simplify the presentation of deferred income taxes and reduce complexity without decreasing the usefulness of information provided to users of financial statements . the adoption of this pronouncement did not have a significant impact on the company 2019s financial position , results of operations and cash flows . 3 . acquisitions endomondo on january 5 , 2015 , the company acquired 100% ( 100 % ) of the outstanding equity of endomondo , a denmark- based digital connected fitness company , to expand the under armour connected fitness community . the purchase price was $ 85.0 million , adjusted for working capital . the company recognized $ 0.6 million and $ 0.8 million in acquisition related costs that were expensed during the three months ended march 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 , respectively . these costs are included in the consolidated statements of income in the line item entitled 201cselling , general and administrative expenses . 201d pro forma results are not presented , as the acquisition was not considered material to the consolidated company . myfitnesspal on march 17 , 2015 , the company acquired 100% ( 100 % ) of the outstanding equity of mfp , a digital nutrition and connected fitness company , to expand the under armour connected fitness community . the final adjusted transaction value totaled $ 474.0 million . the total consideration of $ 463.9 million was adjusted to reflect the accelerated vesting of certain share awards of mfp , which are not conditioned upon continued employment , and transaction costs borne by the selling shareholders . the acquisition was funded with $ 400.0 million of increased term loan borrowings and a draw on the revolving credit facility , with the remaining amount funded by cash on the company recognized $ 5.7 million of acquisition related costs that were expensed during the three months ended march 31 , 2015 . these costs are included in the consolidated statement of income in the line item entitled 201cselling , general and administrative expenses . 201d the following represents the pro forma consolidated income statement as if mfp had been included in the consolidated results of the company for the year ended december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014: .

Table: ( in thousands ) year ended december 31 , 2015 year ended december 31 , 2014 net revenues $ 3967008 $ 3098341 net income 231277 189659

these amounts have been calculated after applying the company 2019s accounting policies and adjusting the results of mfp to reflect the acquisition as if it closed on january 1 , 2014 . pro forma net income for the year ended december 31 , 2014 includes $ 5.7 million in transaction expenses which were included in the consolidated statement of income for the year ended december 31 , 2015 , but excluded from the calculation of pro forma net income for december 31 , 2015. .

Question: what was the profit margin in 2015
Answer: 5.8%
Calculation: divide(231277, 3967008)
Explanation: the profit margin was 5.8% in 2015
performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 65691 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2018 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2017 . the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2012 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested . comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials .

Table: date citi s&p 500 s&p financials 31-dec-2012 100.0 100.0 100.0 31-dec-2013 131.8 132.4 135.6 31-dec-2014 137.0 150.5 156.2 31-dec-2015 131.4 152.6 153.9 31-dec-2016 152.3 170.8 188.9 31-dec-2017 193.5 208.1 230.9

.

Question: what was the percentage growth of the five-year cumulative total return of s&p financials from 2015 to 2016
Calculation: divide(subtract(188.9, 153.9), 153.9)
before the purchase in november 2008 , the units will be reflected in diluted earnings per share calculations using the treasury stock method as defined by sfas no . 128 , earnings per share . under this method , the number of shares of common stock used in calculating diluted earnings per share ( based on the settlement formula applied at the end of the reporting period ) is deemed to be increased by the excess , if any , of the number of shares that would be issued upon settlement of the purchase contracts less the number of shares that could be purchased by the company in the market at the average market price during the period using the proceeds to be received upon settlement . therefore , dilution will occur for periods when the average market price of the company 2019s common stock for the reporting period is above $ 21.816 . senior secured revolving credit facility in september 2005 , the company entered into a $ 250 million , three-year senior secured revolving credit facility . as a result of the citadel investment in november 2007 , the facility was terminated and all unamortized debt issuance costs were expensed . corporate debt covenants certain of the company 2019s corporate debt described above have terms which include customary financial covenants . as of december 31 , 2007 , the company was in compliance with all such covenants . early extinguishment of debt in 2006 , the company called the entire remaining $ 185.2 million principal amount of its 6% ( 6 % ) notes for redemption . the company recorded a $ 0.7 million loss on early extinguishment of debt relating to the write-off of the unamortized debt offering costs . the company did not have any early extinguishments of debt in 2005 . other corporate debt the company also has multiple term loans from financial institutions . these loans are collateralized by equipment and are included within other borrowings on the consolidated balance sheet . see note 14 2014securities sold under agreement to repurchase and other borrowings . future maturities of corporate debt scheduled principal payments of corporate debt as of december 31 , 2007 are as follows ( dollars in thousands ) : years ending december 31 .

Table: 2008 $ 2014 2009 2014 2010 2014 2011 453815 2012 2014 thereafter 2996337 total future principal payments of corporate debt 3450152 unamortized discount net -427454 ( 427454 ) total corporate debt $ 3022698

.

Question: as of december 2007 what was the ratio of the future debt maturities for 2011 to the amounts after 2012
Answer: 0.15
Calculation: divide(453815, 2996337)
Explanation: as of december 2007 , there was $ 0.15 maturities coming up in 2011 to the amounts after 2012 .
performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 65691 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2018 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2017 . the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2012 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested . comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials .

Table: date citi s&p 500 s&p financials 31-dec-2012 100.0 100.0 100.0 31-dec-2013 131.8 132.4 135.6 31-dec-2014 137.0 150.5 156.2 31-dec-2015 131.4 152.6 153.9 31-dec-2016 152.3 170.8 188.9 31-dec-2017 193.5 208.1 230.9

.

Question: what was the difference in percentage cumulative total return for the five year period ended 31-dec-2017 of citi common stock and s&p financials?
Calculation: subtract(divide(subtract(193.5, const_100), const_100), divide(subtract(230.9, const_100), const_100))
part ii . item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities our common stock is traded on the nasdaq global select market under the symbol cdns . as of february 2 , 2019 , we had 523 registered stockholders and approximately 56000 beneficial owners of our common stock . stockholder return performance graph the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index on december 28 , 2013 ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 and tracks it each year thereafter on the last day of our fiscal year through december 29 , 2018 and , for each index , on the last day of the calendar year . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index 12/29/181/2/16 12/30/1712/28/13 12/31/161/3/15 *$ 100 invested on 12/28/13 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending december 29 . copyright a9 2019 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved . nasdaq compositecadence design systems , inc . s&p 500 s&p 500 information technology .

Table: 12/28/2013 1/3/2015 1/2/2016 12/31/2016 12/30/2017 12/29/2018 cadence design systems inc . $ 100.00 $ 135.18 $ 149.39 $ 181.05 $ 300.22 $ 311.13 nasdaq composite 100.00 112.60 113.64 133.19 172.11 165.84 s&p 500 100.00 110.28 109.54 129.05 157.22 150.33 s&p 500 information technology 100.00 115.49 121.08 144.85 201.10 200.52

the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .

Question: what was the difference in percentage cumulative 5-year total stockholder return for cadence design systems inc . compared to the nasdaq composite for the period ending 12/29/2018?
Answer: 145.29%
Calculation: subtract(divide(subtract(311.13, const_100), const_100), divide(subtract(165.84, const_100), const_100))
amortized over a nine-year period beginning december 2015 . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the business combination and customer credits . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of more favorable weather during the unbilled period and an increase in industrial usage , partially offset by the effect of less favorable weather on residential sales . the increase in industrial usage is primarily due to expansion projects , primarily in the chemicals industry , and increased demand from new customers , primarily in the industrial gases industry . the louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation variance results from a regulatory charge for tax savings to be shared with customers per an agreement approved by the lpsc . the tax savings resulted from the 2010-2011 irs audit settlement on the treatment of the louisiana act 55 financing of storm costs for hurricane gustav and hurricane ike . see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing . included in other is a provision of $ 23 million recorded in 2016 related to the settlement of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding , offset by a provision of $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty at that time associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . a0 see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . entergy wholesale commodities following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 . amount ( in millions ) .

Table: amount ( in millions ) 2015 net revenue $ 1666 nuclear realized price changes -149 ( 149 ) rhode island state energy center -44 ( 44 ) nuclear volume -36 ( 36 ) fitzpatrick reimbursement agreement 41 nuclear fuel expenses 68 other -4 ( 4 ) 2016 net revenue $ 1542

as shown in the table above , net revenue for entergy wholesale commodities decreased by approximately $ 124 million in 2016 primarily due to : 2022 lower realized wholesale energy prices and lower capacity prices , the amortization of the palisades below- market ppa , and vermont yankee capacity revenue . the effect of the amortization of the palisades below- market ppa and vermont yankee capacity revenue on the net revenue variance from 2015 to 2016 is minimal ; 2022 the sale of the rhode island state energy center in december 2015 . see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rhode island state energy center sale ; and 2022 lower volume in the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear fleet resulting from more refueling outage days in 2016 as compared to 2015 and larger exercise of resupply options in 2016 as compared to 2015 . see 201cnuclear matters - indian point 201d below for discussion of the extended indian point 2 outage in the second quarter entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis .

Question: what is the net change in net revenue during 2016?
Answer: -124
Calculation: subtract(1542, 1666)
coupons and expected maturity values of individually selected bonds . the yield curve was developed for a universe containing the majority of u.s.-issued aa-graded corporate bonds , all of which were non callable ( or callable with make-whole provisions ) . historically , for each plan , the discount rate was developed as the level equivalent rate that would produce the same present value as that using spot rates aligned with the projected benefit payments . the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is based on historical and projected rates of return , prior to administrative and investment management fees , for current and planned asset classes in the plans 2019 investment portfolios . assumed projected rates of return for each of the plans 2019 projected asset classes were selected after analyzing historical experience and future expectations of the returns and volatility of the various asset classes . based on the target asset allocation for each asset class , the overall expected rate of return for the portfolio was developed , adjusted for historical and expected experience of active portfolio management results compared to the benchmark returns and for the effect of expenses paid from plan assets . the company 2019s pension expense increases as the expected return on assets decreases . assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the other postretirement benefit plans . the health care cost trend rate is based on historical rates and expected market conditions . a one-percentage-point change in assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following effects : percentage- increase percentage- decrease .

Table: one-percentage-pointincrease one-percentage-pointdecrease effect on total of service and interest cost components $ 7367 $ -5974 ( 5974 ) effect on other postretirement benefit obligation $ 72238 $ -60261 ( 60261 )

.

Question: what was the net effect of the one-percentage point increase and decrease on total service and interest cost components
Calculation: add(7367, -5974)
Explanation: the net effect of the one-percentage point increase and decrease on total service and interest cost components is the sum of 7367 and -5974 equal to 1393
part ii item 5 2014market for registrant 2019s common equity and related stockholder matters market information . the common stock of the company is currently traded on the new york stock exchange ( nyse ) under the symbol 2018 2018aes . 2019 2019 the following tables set forth the high and low sale prices for the common stock as reported by the nyse for the periods indicated . price range of common stock .

Table: 2002 first quarter high $ 17.84 low $ 4.11 2001 first quarter high $ 60.15 low $ 41.30 second quarter 9.17 3.55 second quarter 52.25 39.95 third quarter 4.61 1.56 third quarter 44.50 12.00 fourth quarter 3.57 0.95 fourth quarter 17.80 11.60

holders . as of march 3 , 2003 , there were 9663 record holders of the company 2019s common stock , par value $ 0.01 per share . dividends . under the terms of the company 2019s senior secured credit facilities entered into with a commercial bank syndicate , the company is not allowed to pay cash dividends . in addition , the company is precluded from paying cash dividends on its common stock under the terms of a guaranty to the utility customer in connection with the aes thames project in the event certain net worth and liquidity tests of the company are not met . the ability of the company 2019s project subsidiaries to declare and pay cash dividends to the company is subject to certain limitations in the project loans , governmental provisions and other agreements entered into by such project subsidiaries . securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans . see the information contained under the caption 2018 2018securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans 2019 2019 of the proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders of the registrant to be held on may 1 , 2003 , which information is incorporated herein by reference. .

Question: what was the average high and low stock price for the second quarter of 2002?
Answer: 6.36
Calculation: divide(add(9.17, 3.55), const_2)
stock performance graph * $ 100 invested on 11/17/11 in our stock or 10/31/11 in the relevant index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending december 31 , 2014 . ( 1 ) delphi automotive plc ( 2 ) s&p 500 2013 standard & poor 2019s 500 total return index ( 3 ) automotive supplier peer group 2013 russell 3000 auto parts index , including american axle & manufacturing , borgwarner inc. , cooper tire & rubber company , dana holding corp. , delphi automotive plc , dorman products inc. , federal-mogul corp. , ford motor co. , fuel systems solutions inc. , general motors co. , gentex corp. , gentherm inc. , genuine parts co. , johnson controls inc. , lkq corp. , lear corp. , meritor inc. , remy international inc. , standard motor products inc. , stoneridge inc. , superior industries international , trw automotive holdings corp. , tenneco inc. , tesla motors inc. , the goodyear tire & rubber co. , tower international inc. , visteon corp. , and wabco holdings inc . company index november 17 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 .

Table: company index november 17 2011 december 31 2011 december 31 2012 december 31 2013 december 31 2014 delphi automotive plc ( 1 ) $ 100.00 $ 100.98 $ 179.33 $ 285.81 $ 350.82 s&p 500 ( 2 ) 100.00 100.80 116.93 154.80 175.99 automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ) 100.00 89.27 110.41 166.46 178.05

dividends on february 26 , 2013 , the board of directors approved the initiation of dividend payments on the company's ordinary shares . the board of directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.17 per ordinary share that was paid in each quarter of 2013 . in january 2014 , the board of directors increased the quarterly dividend rate to $ 0.25 per ordinary share , which was paid in each quarter of 2014 . in addition , in january 2015 , the board of directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.25 per ordinary share , payable on february 27 , 2015 to shareholders of record at the close of business on february 18 , 2015. .

Question: what was the percentage total return for delphi automotive plc for the five years ended december 31 2014?\\n
Answer: 250.82%
Calculation: divide(subtract(350.82, const_100), const_100)
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis the decrease in interest income in 2002 was primarily due to : fffd interest recognized in 2001 on grand gulf 1's decommissioning trust funds resulting from the final order addressing system energy's rate proceeding ; fffd interest recognized in 2001 at entergy mississippi and entergy new orleans on the deferred system energy costs that were not being recovered through rates ; and fffd lower interest earned on declining deferred fuel balances . the decrease in interest charges in 2002 is primarily due to : fffd a decrease of $ 31.9 million in interest on long-term debt primarily due to the retirement of long-term debt in late 2001 and early 2002 ; and fffd a decrease of $ 76.0 million in other interest expense primarily due to interest recorded on system energy's reserve for rate refund in 2001 . the refund was made in december 2001 . 2001 compared to 2000 results for the year ended december 31 , 2001 for u.s . utility were also affected by an increase in interest charges of $ 61.5 million primarily due to : fffd the final ferc order addressing the 1995 system energy rate filing ; fffd debt issued at entergy arkansas in july 2001 , at entergy gulf states in june 2000 and august 2001 , at entergy mississippi in january 2001 , and at entergy new orleans in july 2000 and february 2001 ; and fffd borrowings under credit facilities during 2001 , primarily at entergy arkansas . non-utility nuclear the increase in earnings in 2002 for non-utility nuclear from $ 128 million to $ 201 million was primarily due to the operation of indian point 2 and vermont yankee , which were purchased in september 2001 and july 2002 , respectively . the increase in earnings in 2001 for non-utility nuclear from $ 49 million to $ 128 million was primarily due to the operation of fitzpatrick and indian point 3 for a full year , as each was purchased in november 2000 , and the operation of indian point 2 , which was purchased in september 2001 . following are key performance measures for non-utility nuclear: .

Table: 2002 2001 2000 net mw in operation at december 31 3955 3445 2475 generation in gwh for the year 29953 22614 7171 capacity factor for the year 93% ( 93 % ) 93% ( 93 % ) 94% ( 94 % )

2002 compared to 2001 the following fluctuations in the results of operations for non-utility nuclear in 2002 were primarily caused by the acquisitions of indian point 2 and vermont yankee ( except as otherwise noted ) : fffd operating revenues increased $ 411.0 million to $ 1.2 billion ; fffd other operation and maintenance expenses increased $ 201.8 million to $ 596.3 million ; fffd depreciation and amortization expenses increased $ 25.1 million to $ 42.8 million ; fffd fuel expenses increased $ 29.4 million to $ 105.2 million ; fffd nuclear refueling outage expenses increased $ 23.9 million to $ 46.8 million , which was due primarily to a .

Question: in 2002 what was the ratio of the net mw in operation to the generation in gwh for the year
Answer: 2 net mw in operation at december 31 3955 3445 2475\\n3 generation in gwh for the year 29953
Calculation: divide(3955, 29953)