bevaya/FinQA huggingface dataset:
during 2015 , $ 82 million of provision recapture was recorded for purchased impaired loans compared to $ 91 million of provision recapture during 2014 . charge-offs ( which were specifically for commercial loans greater than a defined threshold ) during 2015 were $ 12 million compared to $ 42 million during 2014 . at december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 , the alll on total purchased impaired loans was $ .3 billion and $ .9 billion , respectively . the decline in alll was primarily due to the change in our derecognition policy . for purchased impaired loan pools where an allowance has been recognized , subsequent increases in the net present value of cash flows will result in a provision recapture of any previously recorded alll to the extent applicable , and/or a reclassification from non-accretable difference to accretable yield , which will be recognized prospectively . individual loan transactions where final dispositions have occurred ( as noted above ) result in removal of the loans from their applicable pools for cash flow estimation purposes . the cash flow re- estimation process is completed quarterly to evaluate the appropriateness of the alll associated with the purchased impaired loans . activity for the accretable yield during 2015 and 2014 follows : table 66 : purchased impaired loans 2013 accretable yield .

Table: in millions 2015 2014 january 1 $ 1558 $ 2055 accretion ( including excess cash recoveries ) -466 ( 466 ) -587 ( 587 ) net reclassifications to accretable from non-accretable 226 208 disposals -68 ( 68 ) -118 ( 118 ) december 31 $ 1250 $ 1558

note 5 allowances for loan and lease losses and unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit allowance for loan and lease losses we maintain the alll at levels that we believe to be appropriate to absorb estimated probable credit losses incurred in the portfolios as of the balance sheet date . we use the two main portfolio segments 2013 commercial lending and consumer lending 2013 and develop and document the alll under separate methodologies for each of these segments as discussed in note 1 accounting policies . a rollforward of the alll and associated loan data follows . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 141 .

Question: for 2015 and 2014 , what was the average in millions for provision recapture for purchased impaired loans?
Answer: 86.5
Calculation: divide(add(82, 91), const_2)
page 15 of 100 shareholder return performance the line graph below compares the annual percentage change in ball corporation 2019s cumulative total shareholder return on its common stock with the cumulative total return of the dow jones containers & packaging index and the s&p composite 500 stock index for the five-year period ended december 31 , 2010 . it assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2005 , and that all dividends were reinvested . the dow jones containers & packaging index total return has been weighted by market capitalization . total return analysis .

Table: 12/31/05 12/31/06 12/31/07 12/31/08 12/31/09 12/31/10 ball corporation $ 100.00 $ 110.86 $ 115.36 $ 107.58 $ 134.96 $ 178.93 dj containers & packaging index $ 100.00 $ 112.09 $ 119.63 $ 75.00 $ 105.34 $ 123.56 s&p 500 index $ 100.00 $ 115.80 $ 122.16 $ 76.96 $ 97.33 $ 111.99 copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm ) copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm ) copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm ) copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm ) copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm ) copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm ) copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm ) copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved . copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved . copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved . copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved . copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved . copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved . copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .

.

Question: what is the five year total return on ball stock?
Answer: 34.96
Calculation: subtract(134.96, 100.00)
entergy arkansas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2017 compared to 2016 net income decreased $ 27.4 million primarily due to higher nuclear refueling outage expenses , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , higher taxes other than income taxes , and higher interest expense , partially offset by higher other income . 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 92.9 million primarily due to higher net revenue and lower other operation and maintenance expenses , partially offset by a higher effective income tax rate and higher depreciation and amortization expenses . net revenue 2017 compared to 2016 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . a0 a0following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 . amount ( in millions ) .

Table: amount ( in millions ) 2016 net revenue $ 1520.5 retail electric price 33.8 opportunity sales 5.6 asset retirement obligation -14.8 ( 14.8 ) volume/weather -29.0 ( 29.0 ) other 6.5 2017 net revenue $ 1522.6

the retail electric price variance is primarily due to the implementation of formula rate plan rates effective with the first billing cycle of january 2017 and an increase in base rates effective february 24 , 2016 , each as approved by the apsc . a significant portion of the base rate increase was related to the purchase of power block 2 of the union power station in march 2016 . the increase was partially offset by decreases in the energy efficiency rider , as approved by the apsc , effective april 2016 and january 2017 . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate case and formula rate plan filings . see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the union power station purchase . the opportunity sales variance results from the estimated net revenue effect of the 2017 and 2016 ferc orders in the opportunity sales proceeding attributable to wholesale customers . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the opportunity sales proceeding. .

Question: what was the average net revenue between 2016 and 2017 in millions
Answer: 1521.55
Calculation: divide(add(1520.5, 1522.6), const_2)
federal realty investment trust schedule iii summary of real estate and accumulated depreciation 2014continued three years ended december 31 , 2005 reconciliation of accumulated depreciation and amortization .

Table: balance december 31 2002 $ 450697000 additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense 68125000 deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property -4645000 ( 4645000 ) balance december 31 2003 514177000 additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense 82551000 deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property -1390000 ( 1390000 ) balance december 31 2004 595338000 additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense 83656000 deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property -15244000 ( 15244000 ) balance december 31 2005 $ 663750000

.

Question: what is the growth of the additions in comparison with the growth of the deductions during 2003 and 2004?
Answer: 92%
Calculation: subtract(subtract(divide(82551000, 68125000), const_1), subtract(divide(1390000, 4645000), const_1))
Explanation: it is the difference between each percentual variation during 2003 and 2004 .
supplementary information on oil and gas producing activities ( unaudited ) c o n t i n u e d summary of changes in standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows relating to proved oil and gas reserves ( in millions ) 2007 2006 2005 sales and transfers of oil and gas produced , net of production , transportation and administrative costs $ ( 4887 ) $ ( 5312 ) $ ( 3754 ) net changes in prices and production , transportation and administrative costs related to future production 12845 ( 1342 ) 6648 .

Table: ( in millions ) 2007 2006 2005 sales and transfers of oil and gas produced net of production transportation and administrative costs $ -4887 ( 4887 ) $ -5312 ( 5312 ) $ -3754 ( 3754 ) net changes in prices and production transportation and administrative costs related to future production 12845 -1342 ( 1342 ) 6648 extensions discoveries and improved recovery less related costs 1816 1290 700 development costs incurred during the period 1654 1251 1030 changes in estimated future development costs -1727 ( 1727 ) -527 ( 527 ) -552 ( 552 ) revisions of previous quantity estimates 290 1319 820 net changes in purchases and sales of minerals in place 23 30 4557 accretion of discount 1726 1882 1124 net change in income taxes -6751 ( 6751 ) -660 ( 660 ) -6694 ( 6694 ) timing and other -12 ( 12 ) -14 ( 14 ) 307 net change for the year 4977 -2083 ( 2083 ) 4186 beginning of year 8518 10601 6415 end of year $ 13495 $ 8518 $ 10601 net change for the year from discontinued operations $ 2013 $ -216 ( 216 ) $ 162

.

Question: 5 development costs incurred during the period 1654 1251 1030
Answer: 1311.7
Calculation: table_average(development costs incurred during the period, none)
item 1b . unresolved staff comments not applicable . item 2 . properties as of december 28 , 2013 , our major facilities consisted of : ( square feet in millions ) united states countries total owned facilities1 29.9 16.7 46.6 leased facilities2 2.3 6.0 8.3 .

Table: ( square feet in millions ) unitedstates othercountries total owned facilities1 29.9 16.7 46.6 leased facilities2 2.3 6.0 8.3 total facilities 32.2 22.7 54.9

1 leases on portions of the land used for these facilities expire on varying dates through 2062 . 2 leases expire on varying dates through 2028 and generally include renewals at our option . our principal executive offices are located in the u.s . and a significant amount of our wafer fabrication activities are also located in the u.s . in addition to our current facilities , we are building a development fabrication facility in oregon which began r&d start-up in 2013 . we expect that this new facility will allow us to widen our process technology lead . we also completed construction of a large-scale fabrication building in arizona in 2013 , which is currently not in use and is not being depreciated . we recently announced that we plan to delay equipment installation in this building and leverage existing fabrication facilities , reserving this new facility for additional capacity and future technologies . outside the u.s. , we have wafer fabrication facilities in israel , china , and ireland . our fabrication facility in ireland is currently transitioning to a newer process technology node , with manufacturing expected to recommence in 2015 . our assembly and test facilities are located in malaysia , china , costa rica , and vietnam . in addition , we have sales and marketing offices worldwide that are generally located near major concentrations of customers . we believe that the facilities described above are suitable and adequate for our present purposes and that the productive capacity in our facilities is substantially being utilized or we have plans to utilize it . we do not identify or allocate assets by operating segment . for information on net property , plant and equipment by country , see 201cnote 27 : operating segments and geographic information 201d in part ii , item 8 of this form 10-k . item 3 . legal proceedings for a discussion of legal proceedings , see 201cnote 26 : contingencies 201d in part ii , item 8 of this form 10-k . item 4 . mine safety disclosures not applicable . table of contents .

Question: what percentage of major facilities by square footage are owned as of december 28 , 2013?
Answer: 85%
Calculation: divide(46.6, 54.9)
stockholder return performance graphs the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2007 and tracks it through december 29 , 2012 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/29/1212/31/111/1/111/2/101/3/0912/29/07 *$ 100 invested on 12/29/07 in stock or 12/31/07 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved. .

Table: 12/29/2007 1/3/2009 1/2/2010 1/1/2011 12/31/2011 12/29/2012 cadence design systems inc . 100.00 22.55 35.17 48.50 61.07 78.92 nasdaq composite 100.00 59.03 82.25 97.32 98.63 110.78 s&p 400 information technology 100.00 54.60 82.76 108.11 95.48 109.88

the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .

Question: what was the percentage cumulative 5-year total stockholder return for cadence design systems inc . for the five years ended 12/29/2012?
Answer: -21.08%
Calculation: divide(subtract(78.92, const_100), const_100)
in the ordinary course of business , based on our evaluations of certain geologic trends and prospective economics , we have allowed certain lease acreage to expire and may allow additional acreage to expire in the future . if production is not established or we take no other action to extend the terms of the leases , licenses or concessions , undeveloped acreage listed in the table below will expire over the next three years . we plan to continue the terms of certain of these licenses and concession areas or retain leases through operational or administrative actions ; however , the majority of the undeveloped acres associated with other africa as listed in the table below pertains to our licenses in ethiopia and kenya , for which we executed agreements in 2015 to sell . the kenya transaction closed in february 2016 and the ethiopia transaction is expected to close in the first quarter of 2016 . see item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data - note 5 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information about this disposition . net undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 .

Table: ( in thousands ) net undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 , 2016 net undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 , 2017 net undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 , 2018 u.s . 68 89 128 e.g . 2014 92 36 other africa 189 4352 854 total africa 189 4444 890 other international 2014 2014 2014 total 257 4533 1018

.

Question: what was total net undeveloped acres expiring for the three year period , in thousands?
Answer: 5808
Calculation: table_sum(total, none)
alexion pharmaceuticals , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) for the years ended december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , five month period ended december 31 , 2005 , and year ended july 31 , 2005 ( amounts in thousands , except share and per share amounts ) aggregate future minimum annual rental payments for the next five years and thereafter under non-cancellable operating leases ( including facilities and equipment ) as of december 31 , 2007 are: .

Table: 2008 $ 4935 2009 3144 2010 3160 2011 3200 2012 2768 thereafter 9934

9 . commitments and contingencies legal proceedings on march 16 , 2007 , pdl biopharma , inc. , or pdl , filed a civil action against alexion in the u.s . district court for the district of delaware . pdl claims willful infringement by alexion of pdl patents due to sales of soliris . pdl seeks unspecified damages , but no less than a reasonable royalty , plus attorney 2019s fees . alexion has denied pdl's claims . in addition , we filed counterclaims seeking declarations of non-infringement and invalidity of certain u.s . patents held by pdl . alexion believes it has good and valid defenses to pdl's claims and intends to vigorously defend the case and pursue its counterclaims . on february 4 , 2008 , sb2 , inc . filed a civil action against alexion in the united states district court for the northern district of california . sb2 , inc . claims willfull infringement by alexion of sb2 , inc . patents due to sales of soliris . sb2 , inc . seeks unspecified monetary damages , equitable relief and attorneys fees . alexion believes it has good and valid defenses to sb2's claims and intends to vigorously defend the case and pursue its counterclaims . the results of such civil actions cannot be predicted with certainty due to their early stages . however , depending on the outcome of these legal matters , the operating results of the company could be materially impacted through adjustments to cost of sales ( see notes 2 , 6 and 15 for additional information related to royalties ) . product supply the large-scale product supply agreement dated december 18 , 2002 , or the lonza agreement , between lonza sales ag , or lonza , and us , relating to the manufacture of soliris , was amended in june 2007 . we amended our supply agreement to provide for additional purchase commitments of soliris of $ 30000 to $ 35000 through 2013 . such commitments may only be cancelled in limited circumstances. .

Question: what is the average future minimum annual rental payment for the next five years?
Answer: 4441
Calculation: divide(add(add(add(add(3144, 3160), 3200), 2768), 9934), const_5)
market price and dividends d u k e r e a l t y c o r p o r a t i o n 3 8 2 0 0 2 a n n u a l r e p o r t the company 2019s common shares are listed for trading on the new york stock exchange , symbol dre . the following table sets forth the high and low sales prices of the common stock for the periods indicated and the dividend paid per share during each such period . comparable cash dividends are expected in the future . on january 29 , 2003 , the company declared a quarterly cash dividend of $ .455 per share , payable on february 28 , 2003 , to common shareholders of record on february 14 , 2003. .

Table: quarter ended 2002 high 2002 low 2002 dividend 2002 high 2002 low dividend december 31 $ 25.84 $ 21.50 $ .455 $ 24.80 $ 22.00 $ .45 september 30 28.88 21.40 .455 26.17 21.60 .45 june 30 28.95 25.46 .450 24.99 22.00 .43 march 31 26.50 22.92 .450 25.44 21.85 .43

.

Question: what is the percent change in quarterly cash dividend for the period ended march 31 2002 to the period ended march 31 2003?
Answer: 1.11%
Calculation: multiply(divide(subtract(.455, .450), .450), const_100)
entergy new orleans , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) .

Table: amount ( in millions ) 2007 net revenue $ 231.0 volume/weather 15.5 net gas revenue 6.6 rider revenue 3.9 base revenue -11.3 ( 11.3 ) other 7.0 2008 net revenue $ 252.7

the volume/weather variance is due to an increase in electricity usage in the service territory in 2008 compared to the same period in 2007 . entergy new orleans estimates that approximately 141000 electric customers and 93000 gas customers have returned since hurricane katrina and are taking service as of december 31 , 2008 , compared to approximately 132000 electric customers and 86000 gas customers as of december 31 , 2007 . billed retail electricity usage increased a total of 184 gwh compared to the same period in 2007 , an increase of 4% ( 4 % ) . the net gas revenue variance is primarily due to an increase in base rates in march and november 2007 . refer to note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the base rate increase . the rider revenue variance is due primarily to higher total revenue and a storm reserve rider effective march 2007 as a result of the city council's approval of a settlement agreement in october 2006 . the approved storm reserve has been set to collect $ 75 million over a ten-year period through the rider and the funds will be held in a restricted escrow account . the settlement agreement is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements . the base revenue variance is primarily due to a base rate recovery credit , effective january 2008 . the base rate credit is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements . gross operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : an increase of $ 58.9 million in gross wholesale revenue due to increased sales to affiliated customers and an increase in the average price of energy available for resale sales ; an increase of $ 47.7 million in electric fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates and increased electricity usage ; and an increase of $ 22 million in gross gas revenues due to higher fuel recovery revenues and increases in gas base rates in march 2007 and november 2007 . fuel and purchased power increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power in addition to an increase in demand. .

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenue in 2008 compare to 2007?
Answer: 9.4%
Calculation: divide(subtract(252.7, 231.0), 231.0)
the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total return to shareholders of cadence design systems , inc . 2019s common stock relative to the cumulative total returns of the s & p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s & p information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in the company 2019s common stock and in each of the indexes ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2001 and tracks it through december 30 , 2006 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the s & p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s & p information technology index 12/30/0612/31/051/1/051/3/0412/28/0212/29/01 cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s & p information technology s & p 500 * $ 100 invested on 12/29/01 in stock or on 12/31/01 in index-incuding reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright b7 2007 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc . all rights reserved . www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm december 29 , december 28 , january 3 , january 1 , december 31 , december 30 .

Table: december 29 2001 december 28 2002 january 3 2004 january 1 2005 december 31 2005 december 30 2006 cadence design systems inc . 100.00 54.38 81.52 61.65 75.54 79.96 s & p 500 100.00 77.90 100.24 111.15 116.61 135.03 nasdaq composite 100.00 71.97 107.18 117.07 120.50 137.02 s & p information technology 100.00 62.59 92.14 94.50 95.44 103.47

.

Question: what is the rate of return of an investment in s&p500 inc from 2001 to 2005?
Answer: 11.2%
Calculation: divide(subtract(111.15, const_100), const_100)