bevaya/FinQA huggingface dataset:
"three factor formula" ) . the consolidated financial statements include northrop grumman management and support services allocations totaling $ 32 million for the year ended december 31 , 2011 . shared services and infrastructure costs - this category includes costs for functions such as information technology support , systems maintenance , telecommunications , procurement and other shared services while hii was a subsidiary of northrop grumman . these costs were generally allocated to the company using the three factor formula or based on usage . the consolidated financial statements reflect shared services and infrastructure costs allocations totaling $ 80 million for the year ended december 31 , 2011 . northrop grumman-provided benefits - this category includes costs for group medical , dental and vision insurance , 401 ( k ) savings plan , pension and postretirement benefits , incentive compensation and other benefits . these costs were generally allocated to the company based on specific identification of the benefits provided to company employees participating in these benefit plans . the consolidated financial statements include northrop grumman- provided benefits allocations totaling $ 169 million for the year ended december 31 , 2011 . management believes that the methods of allocating these costs are reasonable , consistent with past practices , and in conformity with cost allocation requirements of cas or the far . related party sales and cost of sales prior to the spin-off , hii purchased and sold certain products and services from and to other northrop grumman entities . purchases of products and services from these affiliated entities , which were recorded at cost , were $ 44 million for the year ended december 31 , 2011 . sales of products and services to these entities were $ 1 million for the year ended december 31 , 2011 . former parent's equity in unit transactions between hii and northrop grumman prior to the spin-off have been included in the consolidated financial statements and were effectively settled for cash at the time the transaction was recorded . the net effect of the settlement of these transactions is reflected as former parent's equity in unit in the consolidated statement of changes in equity . 21 . unaudited selected quarterly data unaudited quarterly financial results for the years ended december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , are set forth in the following tables: .

Table: ( $ in millions except per share amounts ) year ended december 31 2013 1st qtr year ended december 31 2013 2nd qtr year ended december 31 2013 3rd qtr year ended december 31 2013 4th qtr sales and service revenues $ 1562 $ 1683 $ 1637 $ 1938 operating income ( loss ) 95 116 127 174 earnings ( loss ) before income taxes 65 87 99 143 net earnings ( loss ) 44 57 69 91 dividends declared per share $ 0.10 $ 0.10 $ 0.10 $ 0.20 basic earnings ( loss ) per share $ 0.88 $ 1.14 $ 1.38 $ 1.86 diluted earnings ( loss ) per share $ 0.87 $ 1.12 $ 1.36 $ 1.82

.

Question: for the year ended december 31 2013 , what was the net margin for the 2nd qtr
Answer: 6.9%
Calculation: divide(116, 1683)
federal realty investment trust schedule iii summary of real estate and accumulated depreciation 2014continued three years ended december 31 , 2009 reconciliation of accumulated depreciation and amortization ( in thousands ) .

Table: balance december 31 2006 $ 740507 additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense 96454 deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property -80258 ( 80258 ) balance december 31 2007 756703 additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense 101321 deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property -11766 ( 11766 ) balance december 31 2008 846258 additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense 103.698 deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property -11869 ( 11869 ) balance december 31 2009 $ 938087

.

Question: considering the years 2006-2009 , what is the value of the average additions?
Answer: 100491
Calculation: divide(add(add(96454, 101321), multiply(const_1000, 103.698)), const_3)
Explanation: it is the sum of the additions value divide by the sum of the years .
page 92 of 98 other information required by item 10 appearing under the caption 201cdirector nominees and continuing directors 201d and 201csection 16 ( a ) beneficial ownership reporting compliance , 201d of the company 2019s proxy statement to be filed pursuant to regulation 14a within 120 days after december 31 , 2006 , is incorporated herein by reference . item 11 . executive compensation the information required by item 11 appearing under the caption 201cexecutive compensation 201d in the company 2019s proxy statement , to be filed pursuant to regulation 14a within 120 days after december 31 , 2006 , is incorporated herein by reference . additionally , the ball corporation 2000 deferred compensation company stock plan , the ball corporation deposit share program and the ball corporation directors deposit share program were created to encourage key executives and other participants to acquire a larger equity ownership interest in the company and to increase their interest in the company 2019s stock performance . non-employee directors also participate in the 2000 deferred compensation company stock plan . item 12 . security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management the information required by item 12 appearing under the caption 201cvoting securities and principal shareholders , 201d in the company 2019s proxy statement to be filed pursuant to regulation 14a within 120 days after december 31 , 2006 , is incorporated herein by reference . securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans are summarized below: .

Table: plan category equity compensation plan information number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( a ) equity compensation plan information weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options warrants and rights ( b ) equity compensation plan information number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 4852978 $ 26.69 5941210 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders 2013 2013 2013 total 4852978 $ 26.69 5941210

item 13 . certain relationships and related transactions the information required by item 13 appearing under the caption 201cratification of the appointment of independent registered public accounting firm , 201d in the company 2019s proxy statement to be filed pursuant to regulation 14a within 120 days after december 31 , 2006 , is incorporated herein by reference . item 14 . principal accountant fees and services the information required by item 14 appearing under the caption 201ccertain committees of the board , 201d in the company 2019s proxy statement to be filed pursuant to regulation 14a within 120 days after december 31 , 2006 , is incorporated herein by reference. .

Question: in the equity plans for 2006 , are there more shares issued than remaining in the plan?
Answer: yes
Calculation: greater(5941210, 4852978)
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 1402 gwh , or 1% ( 1 % ) , in billed electricity usage , including an increase in industrial usage and the effect of more favorable weather . the increase in industrial sales was primarily due to expansion in the chemicals industry and the addition of new customers , partially offset by decreased demand primarily due to extended maintenance outages for existing chemicals customers . the waterford 3 replacement steam generator provision is due to a regulatory charge of approximately $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator project . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . the miso deferral variance is primarily due to the deferral in 2014 of non-fuel miso-related charges , as approved by the lpsc and the mpsc . the deferral of non-fuel miso-related charges is partially offset in other operation and maintenance expenses . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the recovery of non-fuel miso-related charges . the louisiana business combination customer credits variance is due to a regulatory liability of $ 107 million recorded by entergy in october 2015 as a result of the entergy gulf states louisiana and entergy louisiana business combination . consistent with the terms of the stipulated settlement in the business combination proceeding , electric customers of entergy louisiana will realize customer credits associated with the business combination ; accordingly , in october 2015 , entergy recorded a regulatory liability of $ 107 million ( $ 66 million net-of-tax ) . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the business combination and customer credits . entergy wholesale commodities following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2015 to 2014 . amount ( in millions ) .

Table: amount ( in millions ) 2014 net revenue $ 2224 nuclear realized price changes -310 ( 310 ) vermont yankee shutdown in december 2014 -305 ( 305 ) nuclear volume excluding vermont yankee effect 20 other 37 2015 net revenue $ 1666

as shown in the table above , net revenue for entergy wholesale commodities decreased by approximately $ 558 million in 2016 primarily due to : 2022 lower realized wholesale energy prices , primarily due to significantly higher northeast market power prices in 2014 , and lower capacity prices in 2015 ; and 2022 a decrease in net revenue as a result of vermont yankee ceasing power production in december 2014 . the decrease was partially offset by higher volume in the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear fleet , excluding vermont yankee , resulting from fewer refueling outage days in 2015 as compared to 2014 , partially offset by more unplanned outage days in 2015 as compared to 2014. .

Question: what is the net change in net revenue during 2015?
Answer: -558
Calculation: subtract(1666, 2224)
the following table illustrates the pro forma effect on net income and earnings per share as if all outstanding and unvested stock options in 2005 were accounted for using estimated fair value . 2005year ended december 31 .

Table: year ended december 31, 2005 ( in millions except per share amounts ) net income as reported $ 838 add : stock option compensation expense included in reported net income net of related taxes 20 deduct : total stock option compensation expense determined under fair value method for all awards net of related taxes -27 ( 27 ) pro forma net income $ 831 earnings per share: basic 2014as reported $ 2.53 basic 2014pro forma 2.51 diluted 2014as reported 2.50 diluted 2014pro forma 2.48

basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period , which excludes unvested shares of restricted stock . diluted earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period and the shares representing the dilutive effect of stock options and awards and other equity-related financial instruments . the effect of stock options and restricted stock outstanding is excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share in periods in which their effect would be antidilutive . special purpose entities : we are involved with various legal forms of special purpose entities , or spes , in the normal course of our business . we use trusts to structure and sell certificated interests in pools of tax-exempt investment-grade assets principally to our mutual fund customers . these trusts are recorded in our consolidated financial statements . we transfer assets to these trusts , which are legally isolated from us , from our investment securities portfolio at adjusted book value . the trusts finance the acquisition of these assets by selling certificated interests issued by the trusts to third-party investors . the investment securities of the trusts are carried in investments securities available for sale at fair value . the certificated interests are carried in other short-term borrowings at the amount owed to the third-party investors . the interest revenue and interest expense generated by the investments and certificated interests , respectively , are recorded in net interest revenue when earned or incurred. .

Question: what is the number of outstanding shares based on the eps , ( in millions ) ?
Answer: 331.2
Calculation: divide(838, 2.53)
table of contents stock performance graph * $ 100 invested on 11/17/11 in our stock or 10/31/11 in the relevant index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending december 31 , 2015 . ( 1 ) delphi automotive plc ( 2 ) s&p 500 2013 standard & poor 2019s 500 total return index ( 3 ) automotive supplier peer group 2013 russell 3000 auto parts index , including american axle & manufacturing , borgwarner inc. , cooper tire & rubber company , dana holding corp. , delphi automotive plc , dorman products inc. , federal-mogul corp. , ford motor co. , fuel systems solutions inc. , general motors co. , gentex corp. , gentherm inc. , genuine parts co. , johnson controls inc. , lear corp. , lkq corp. , meritor inc. , standard motor products inc. , stoneridge inc. , superior industries international , tenneco inc. , tesla motors inc. , the goodyear tire & rubber co. , tower international inc. , visteon corp. , and wabco holdings inc . company index november 17 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 .

Table: company index november 17 2011 december 31 2011 december 31 2012 december 31 2013 december 31 2014 december 31 2015 delphi automotive plc ( 1 ) $ 100.00 $ 100.98 $ 179.33 $ 285.81 $ 350.82 $ 418.67 s&p 500 ( 2 ) 100.00 100.80 116.93 154.80 175.99 178.43 automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ) 100.00 89.62 109.96 166.26 176.25 171.91

dividends the company has declared and paid cash dividends of $ 0.25 per ordinary share in each quarter of 2014 and 2015 . in addition , in january 2016 , the board of directors increased the annual dividend rate to $ 1.16 per ordinary share , and declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.29 per ordinary share , payable on february 29 , 2016 to shareholders of record at the close of business on february 17 , 2016. .

Question: what is the total return on delphi automotive plc for the five year period ending december 31 2015?
Answer: 318.67%
Calculation: divide(subtract(418.67, const_100), const_100)
item 2 : properties information concerning applied 2019s properties is set forth below: .

Table: ( square feet in thousands ) united states other countries total owned 4530 2417 6947 leased 1037 1341 2378 total 5567 3758 9325

because of the interrelation of applied 2019s operations , properties within a country may be shared by the segments operating within that country . the company 2019s headquarters offices are in santa clara , california . products in semiconductor systems are manufactured in santa clara , california ; austin , texas ; gloucester , massachusetts ; kalispell , montana ; rehovot , israel ; and singapore . remanufactured equipment products in the applied global services segment are produced primarily in austin , texas . products in the display and adjacent markets segment are manufactured in alzenau , germany and tainan , taiwan . other products are manufactured in treviso , italy . applied also owns and leases offices , plants and warehouse locations in many locations throughout the world , including in europe , japan , north america ( principally the united states ) , israel , china , india , korea , southeast asia and taiwan . these facilities are principally used for manufacturing ; research , development and engineering ; and marketing , sales and customer support . applied also owns a total of approximately 269 acres of buildable land in montana , texas , california , israel and italy that could accommodate additional building space . applied considers the properties that it owns or leases as adequate to meet its current and future requirements . applied regularly assesses the size , capability and location of its global infrastructure and periodically makes adjustments based on these assessments. .

Question: what portion of company's property is located in united states?
Answer: 59.7%
Calculation: divide(5567, 9325)
the following graph compares the cumulative 4-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on january 3 , 2009 and tracks it through december 29 , 2012 . comparison of 4 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/29/121/1/11 12/31/111/2/101/3/09 *$ 100 invested on 1/3/09 in stock or 12/31/08 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies all rights reserved. .

Table: 1/3/2009 1/2/2010 1/1/2011 12/31/2011 12/29/2012 cadence design systems inc . 100.00 155.99 215.10 270.83 350.00 nasdaq composite 100.00 139.32 164.84 167.06 187.66 s&p 400 information technology 100.00 151.58 198.02 174.88 201.26

the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .

Question: what is the total return if $ 1000000 are invested in nasdaq composite in 2009 and sold in 2010?
Answer: 390000
Calculation: multiply(1000000, divide(subtract(139.32, const_100), const_100))
stock total return performance the following graph compares our total return to stockholders with the returns of the standard & poor 2019s composite 500 index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and the dow jones us select health care providers index ( 201cpeer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2018 . the graph assumes an investment of $ 100 in each of our common stock , the s&p 500 , and the peer group on december 31 , 2013 , and that dividends were reinvested when paid. .

Table: 12/31/2013 12/31/2014 12/31/2015 12/31/2016 12/31/2017 12/31/2018 hum $ 100 $ 140 $ 176 $ 202 $ 247 $ 287 s&p 500 $ 100 $ 114 $ 115 $ 129 $ 157 $ 150 peer group $ 100 $ 128 $ 135 $ 137 $ 173 $ 191

the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .

Question: what is the lowest return for the first year of investment?
Answer: 14%
Calculation: subtract(114, 100)
Explanation: it is the minimum value for the first year of the investment , then turned into a percentage to represent the return .
subject to fluctuation and , consequently , the amount realized in the subsequent sale of an investment may differ significantly from its current reported value . fluctuations in the market price of a security may result from perceived changes in the underlying economic characteristics of the issuer , the relative price of alternative investments and general market conditions . the table below summarizes equity investments that are subject to equity price fluctuations at december 31 , 2012 . equity investments are included in other assets in our consolidated balance sheets . ( in millions ) carrying unrealized net of tax .

Table: ( in millions ) costbasis fairvalue carryingvalue unrealizedgainnet of tax bm&fbovespa s.a . $ 262.9 $ 690.6 $ 690.6 $ 271.4 bolsa mexicana de valores s.a.b . de c.v . 17.3 29.3 29.3 7.6 imarex asa 2014 1.8 1.8 1.1

we do not currently hedge against equity price risk . equity investments are assessed for other-than- temporary impairment on a quarterly basis. .

Question: what is the unrealized gain pre-tex for bolsa mexicana de valores?
Answer: 12
Calculation: subtract(29.3, 17.3)
entergy arkansas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 92.9 million primarily due to higher net revenue and lower other operation and maintenance expenses , partially offset by a higher effective income tax rate and higher depreciation and amortization expenses . 2015 compared to 2014 net income decreased $ 47.1 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses , partially offset by higher net revenue . net revenue 2016 compared to 2015 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 . amount ( in millions ) .

Table: amount ( in millions ) 2015 net revenue $ 1362.2 retail electric price 161.5 other -3.2 ( 3.2 ) 2016 net revenue $ 1520.5

the retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in base rates , as approved by the apsc . the new base rates were effective february 24 , 2016 and began billing with the first billing cycle of april 2016 . the increase includes an interim base rate adjustment surcharge , effective with the first billing cycle of april 2016 , to recover the incremental revenue requirement for the period february 24 , 2016 through march 31 , 2016 . a significant portion of the increase is related to the purchase of power block 2 of the union power station . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate case . see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the union power station purchase. .

Question: what is the net change in net revenue during 2016 for entergy arkansas , inc.?
Answer: 158.3
Calculation: subtract(1520.5, 1362.2)