bevaya/FinQA huggingface dataset:
purchases of equity securities the following table provides information about our repurchases of our common stock registered pursuant to section 12 of the securities exchange act of 1934 during the quarter ended december 31 , 2014 . period ( a ) number of shares purchased average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( b ) amount available for future share repurchases under the plans or programs ( b ) ( in millions ) .

Table: period ( a ) total number of shares purchased average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( b ) amount available for future share repurchases under the plans or programs ( b ) ( in millions ) september 29 2014 2013 october 26 2014 399259 $ 176.96 397911 $ 3825 october 27 2014 2013 november 30 2014 504300 $ 187.74 456904 $ 3739 december 1 2014 2013 december 31 2014 365683 $ 190.81 357413 $ 3671 total 1269242 ( c ) $ 185.23 1212228 $ 3671

total 1269242 ( c ) $ 185.23 1212228 $ 3671 ( a ) we close our books and records on the last sunday of each month to align our financial closing with our business processes , except for the month of december , as our fiscal year ends on december 31 . as a result , our fiscal months often differ from the calendar months . for example , september 29 , 2014 was the first day of our october 2014 fiscal month . ( b ) in october 2010 , our board of directors approved a share repurchase program pursuant to which we are authorized to repurchase our common stock in privately negotiated transactions or in the open market at prices per share not exceeding the then-current market prices . on september 25 , 2014 , our board of directors authorized a $ 2.0 billion increase to the program . under the program , management has discretion to determine the dollar amount of shares to be repurchased and the timing of any repurchases in compliance with applicable law and regulation . we also may make purchases under the program pursuant to rule 10b5-1 plans . the program does not have an expiration date . ( c ) during the quarter ended december 31 , 2014 , the total number of shares purchased included 57014 shares that were transferred to us by employees in satisfaction of minimum tax withholding obligations associated with the vesting of restricted stock units . these purchases were made pursuant to a separate authorization by our board of directors and are not included within the program. .

Question: what is the growth rate in the average price of the purchased shares from october to december 2014?
Answer: 7.8%
Calculation: divide(subtract(190.81, 176.96), 176.96)
at december 31 , 2009 , aon had domestic federal operating loss carryforwards of $ 7 million that will expire at various dates from 2010 to 2024 , state operating loss carryforwards of $ 513 million that will expire at various dates from 2010 to 2028 , and foreign operating and capital loss carryforwards of $ 453 million and $ 252 million , respectively , nearly all of which are subject to indefinite carryforward . unrecognized tax benefits the following is a reconciliation of the company 2019s beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits ( in millions ) : .

Table: 2009 2008 balance at january 1 $ 86 $ 70 additions based on tax positions related to the current year 2 5 additions for tax positions of prior years 5 12 reductions for tax positions of prior years -11 ( 11 ) -11 ( 11 ) settlements -10 ( 10 ) -4 ( 4 ) lapse of statute of limitations -3 ( 3 ) -1 ( 1 ) acquisitions 6 21 foreign currency translation 2 -6 ( 6 ) balance at december 31 $ 77 $ 86

as of december 31 , 2009 , $ 61 million of unrecognized tax benefits would impact the effective tax rate if recognized . aon does not expect the unrecognized tax positions to change significantly over the next twelve months . the company recognizes penalties and interest related to unrecognized income tax benefits in its provision for income taxes . aon accrued potential penalties of less than $ 1 million during each of 2009 , 2008 and 2007 . aon accrued interest of $ 2 million during 2009 and less than $ 1 million during both 2008 and 2007 . as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , aon has recorded a liability for penalties of $ 5 million and $ 4 million , respectively , and for interest of $ 18 million and $ 14 million , respectively . aon and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the u.s . federal jurisdiction as well as various state and international jurisdictions . aon has substantially concluded all u.s . federal income tax matters for years through 2006 . material u.s . state and local income tax jurisdiction examinations have been concluded for years through 2002 . aon has concluded income tax examinations in its primary international jurisdictions through 2002. .

Question: considering the years 2008 and 2009 , what is the increase observed in the liability for interest?
Answer: 28.57%
Calculation: subtract(divide(18, 14), const_1)
Explanation: it is the value of 2009 divide by the 2008's , then transformed into a percentage .
the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 ( 1 ) a u.s . subsidiary of the company has a defined benefit obligation of $ 764 million and $ 679 million as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively , and uses salary bands to determine future benefit costs rather than rates of compensation increases . rates of compensation increases in the table above do not include amounts related to this specific defined benefit plan . ( 2 ) includes an inflation factor that is used to calculate future periodic benefit cost , but is not used to calculate the benefit obligation . the company establishes its estimated long-term return on plan assets considering various factors , which include the targeted asset allocation percentages , historic returns and expected future returns . the measurement of pension obligations , costs and liabilities is dependent on a variety of assumptions . these assumptions include estimates of the present value of projected future pension payments to all plan participants , taking into consideration the likelihood of potential future events such as salary increases and demographic experience . these assumptions may have an effect on the amount and timing of future contributions . the assumptions used in developing the required estimates include the following key factors : 2022 discount rates ; 2022 salary growth ; 2022 retirement rates ; 2022 inflation ; 2022 expected return on plan assets ; and 2022 mortality rates . the effects of actual results differing from the company 2019s assumptions are accumulated and amortized over future periods and , therefore , generally affect the company 2019s recognized expense in such future periods . sensitivity of the company 2019s pension funded status to the indicated increase or decrease in the discount rate and long-term rate of return on plan assets assumptions is shown below . note that these sensitivities may be asymmetric and are specific to the base conditions at year-end 2012 . they also may not be additive , so the impact of changing multiple factors simultaneously cannot be calculated by combining the individual sensitivities shown . the funded status as of december 31 , 2012 is affected by the assumptions as of that date . pension expense for 2012 is affected by the december 31 , 2011 assumptions . the impact on pension expense from a one percentage point change in these assumptions is shown in the table below ( in millions ) : .

Table: increase of 1% ( 1 % ) in the discount rate $ -48 ( 48 ) decrease of 1% ( 1 % ) in the discount rate 38 increase of 1% ( 1 % ) in the long-term rate of return on plan assets -47 ( 47 ) decrease of 1% ( 1 % ) in the long-term rate of return on plan assets 47

.

Question: what was the net reduction in defined benefit obligations between december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , in millions?
Answer: 85
Calculation: subtract(764, 679)
table of contents stock performance graph the following stock performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filings under the securities act of 1933 or the exchange act , each as amended , except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into such filing . the following stock performance graph compares our cumulative total shareholder return on an annual basis on our common stock with the cumulative total return on the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index and the amex airline index from december 9 , 2013 ( the first trading day of aag common stock ) through december 31 , 2014 . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on december 9 , 2013 in aag common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends . the stock performance shown on the graph below represents historical stock performance and is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .

Table: 12/9/2013 12/31/2013 12/31/2014 american airlines group inc . $ 100 $ 103 $ 219 amex airline index 100 102 152 s&p 500 100 102 114

.

Question: by how much did american airlines group inc . outperform the amex airline index over the 3 year period?
Answer: 67%
Calculation: subtract(divide(subtract(219, 100), 100), divide(subtract(152, 100), 100))
table of contents stock performance graph the following stock performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filings under the securities act of 1933 or the exchange act , each as amended , except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into such filing . the following stock performance graph compares our cumulative total shareholder return on an annual basis on our common stock with the cumulative total return on the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index and the amex airline index from december 9 , 2013 ( the first trading day of aag common stock ) through december 31 , 2014 . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on december 9 , 2013 in aag common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends . the stock performance shown on the graph below represents historical stock performance and is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .

Table: 12/9/2013 12/31/2013 12/31/2014 american airlines group inc . $ 100 $ 103 $ 219 amex airline index 100 102 152 s&p 500 100 102 114

.

Question: what was the 3 year return of american airlines group inc.?
Answer: 119%
Calculation: divide(subtract(219, 100), 100)
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2012 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average and our class b common stock. .

Table: 12/31/2012 12/31/2013 12/31/2014 12/31/2015 12/31/2016 12/31/2017 united parcel service inc . $ 100.00 $ 146.54 $ 159.23 $ 148.89 $ 182.70 $ 195.75 standard & poor 2019s 500 index $ 100.00 $ 132.38 $ 150.49 $ 152.55 $ 170.79 $ 208.06 dow jones transportation average $ 100.00 $ 141.38 $ 176.83 $ 147.19 $ 179.37 $ 213.49

.

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareowners return for united parcel service inc . for the five years ended 12/31/2017?
Answer: 95.75%
Calculation: divide(subtract(195.75, const_100), const_100)
stock performance graph the following graph provides a comparison of five year cumulative total stockholder returns of teleflex common stock , the standard & poor 2019s ( s&p ) 500 stock index and the s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index . the annual changes for the five-year period shown on the graph are based on the assumption that $ 100 had been invested in teleflex common stock and each index on december 31 , 2009 and that all dividends were reinvested . market performance .

Table: company / index 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 teleflex incorporated 100 102 119 142 190 235 s&p 500 index 100 115 117 136 180 205 s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index 100 97 97 113 144 182

s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index 100 97 97 113 144 182 .

Question: what is the rate of return of an investment in teleflex incorporated from 2010 to 2011?
Answer: 16.7%
Calculation: divide(subtract(119, 102), 102)
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements as of december 31 , 2008 , system energy had future minimum lease payments ( reflecting an implicit rate of 5.13% ( 5.13 % ) ) , which are recorded as long-term debt as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .

Table: amount ( in thousands ) 2009 $ 47760 2010 48569 2011 49437 2012 49959 2013 50546 years thereafter 103890 total 350161 less : amount representing interest 54857 present value of net minimum lease payments $ 295304

.

Question: what portion of the total lease payments is due in the next 12 months?
Answer: 13.6%
Calculation: divide(47760, 350161)
as of december 31 , 2017 , the aggregate future minimum payments under non-cancelable operating leases consist of the following ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31 .

Table: 2018 $ 9127 2019 8336 2020 8350 2021 7741 2022 7577 thereafter 9873 total minimum future lease payments $ 51004

rent expense for all operating leases amounted to $ 9.4 million , $ 8.1 million and $ 5.4 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . financing obligation 2014build-to-suit lease in august 2012 , we executed a lease for a building then under construction in santa clara , california to serve as our headquarters . the lease term is 120 months and commenced in august 2013 . based on the terms of the lease agreement and due to our involvement in certain aspects of the construction , we were deemed the owner of the building ( for accounting purposes only ) during the construction period . upon completion of construction in 2013 , we concluded that we had forms of continued economic involvement in the facility , and therefore did not meet with the provisions for sale-leaseback accounting . we continue to maintain involvement in the property post construction and lack transferability of the risks and rewards of ownership , due to our required maintenance of a $ 4.0 million letter of credit , in addition to our ability and option to sublease our portion of the leased building for fees substantially higher than our base rate . therefore , the lease is accounted for as a financing obligation and lease payments will be attributed to ( 1 ) a reduction of the principal financing obligation ; ( 2 ) imputed interest expense ; and ( 3 ) land lease expense , representing an imputed cost to lease the underlying land of the building . at the conclusion of the initial lease term , we will de-recognize both the net book values of the asset and the remaining financing obligation . as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , we have recorded assets of $ 53.4 million , representing the total costs of the building and improvements incurred , including the costs paid by the lessor ( the legal owner of the building ) and additional improvement costs paid by us , and a corresponding financing obligation of $ 39.6 million and $ 41.2 million , respectively . as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 1.9 million and $ 37.7 million were recorded as short-term and long-term financing obligations , respectively . land lease expense under our lease financing obligation amounted to $ 1.3 million for each of the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 respectively. .

Question: what portion of the future future minimum payments under non-cancelable operating leases is due in the next 12 months?
Answer: 17.9%
Calculation: divide(9127, 51004)
equity compensation plan information the following table presents the equity securities available for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2015 . equity compensation plan information plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 1 ) weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 2 ) number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 1424356 $ 33.90 4281952 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 3 ) 2014 2014 2014 .

Table: plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( 1 ) ( a ) ( b ) weighted-average exercise price of outstanding optionswarrants and rights ( 2 ) number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securitiesreflected in column ( a ) ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 1424356 $ 33.90 4281952 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 3 ) 2014 2014 2014 total 1424356 $ 33.90 4281952

( 1 ) includes grants made under the huntington ingalls industries , inc . 2012 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2012 plan" ) , which was approved by our stockholders on may 2 , 2012 , and the huntington ingalls industries , inc . 2011 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2011 plan" ) , which was approved by the sole stockholder of hii prior to its spin-off from northrop grumman corporation . of these shares , 533397 were subject to stock options and 54191 were stock rights granted under the 2011 plan . in addition , this number includes 35553 stock rights , 10279 restricted stock rights , and 790936 restricted performance stock rights granted under the 2012 plan , assuming target performance achievement . ( 2 ) this is the weighted average exercise price of the 533397 outstanding stock options only . ( 3 ) there are no awards made under plans not approved by security holders . item 13 . certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence information as to certain relationships and related transactions and director independence will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting of stockholders , to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year . item 14 . principal accountant fees and services information as to principal accountant fees and services will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2016 annual meeting of stockholders , to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year. .

Question: in the "2011 plan" what was the ratio of the stock option stock option stock to the stock rights
Answer: 9.84
Calculation: divide(533397, 54191)
Explanation: in the "2011 plan" the ratio of stock options to stock rights was 9.8 to 1
financial data supplement ( unaudited ) 2014 ( continued ) .

Table: country at december 31 2011 banks at december 31 2011 governments at december 31 2011 other at december 31 2011 total united kingdom $ 13852 $ 2 $ 89585 $ 103439 cayman islands 766 2014 31169 31935 france 23561 1096 4196 28853 japan 23542 436 2821 26799 germany 18674 3485 1859 24018 netherlands 3508 23 8826 12357 luxembourg 1619 94 6137 7850 brazil 149 3398 2165 5712 australia 2008 557 1414 3979 italy 881 1463 539 2883

.

Question: how big is south america compared to asia?
Answer: 21%
Calculation: divide(5712, 26799)
Explanation: brazil - south america , japan - asia
stockholder return performance graph the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index on december 31 , 2011 ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 and tracks it each year thereafter on the last day of our fiscal year through december 31 , 2016 and , for each index , on the last day of the calendar year . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/31/1612/28/13 1/2/1612/31/11 1/3/1512/29/12 *$ 100 invested on 12/31/11 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2017 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved. .

Table: 12/31/2011 12/29/2012 12/28/2013 1/3/2015 1/2/2016 12/31/2016 cadence design systems inc . 100.00 129.23 133.94 181.06 200.10 242.50 nasdaq composite 100.00 116.41 165.47 188.69 200.32 216.54 s&p 400 information technology 100.00 118.41 165.38 170.50 178.74 219.65

the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .

Question: what was the percentage cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on cadence design systems inc . common stock for the period ended 12/31/2016?
Answer: 142.50%
Calculation: divide(subtract(242.50, const_100), const_100)