bevaya/FinQA huggingface dataset:
the containerboard group ( a division of tenneco packaging inc. ) notes to combined financial statements ( continued ) april 11 , 1999 14 . leases ( continued ) to the sale transaction on april 12 , 1999 . therefore , the remaining outstanding aggregate minimum rental commitments under noncancelable operating leases are as follows : ( in thousands ) .

Table: remainder of 1999 $ 7606 2000 7583 2001 4891 2002 3054 2003 1415 thereafter 1178 total $ 25727

15 . sale of assets in the second quarter of 1996 , packaging entered into an agreement to form a joint venture with caraustar industries whereby packaging sold its two recycled paperboard mills and a fiber recycling operation and brokerage business to the joint venture in return for cash and a 20% ( 20 % ) equity interest in the joint venture . proceeds from the sale were approximately $ 115 million and the group recognized a $ 50 million pretax gain ( $ 30 million after taxes ) in the second quarter of 1996 . in june , 1998 , packaging sold its remaining 20% ( 20 % ) equity interest in the joint venture to caraustar industries for cash and a note of $ 26000000 . the group recognized a $ 15 million pretax gain on this transaction . at april 11 , 1999 , the balance of the note with accrued interest is $ 27122000 . the note was paid in june , 1999 . 16 . subsequent events on august 25 , 1999 , pca and packaging agreed that the acquisition consideration should be reduced as a result of a postclosing price adjustment by an amount equal to $ 20 million plus interest through the date of payment by packaging . the group recorded $ 11.9 million of this amount as part of the impairment charge on the accompanying financial statements , representing the amount that was previously estimated by packaging . pca intends to record the remaining amount in september , 1999 . in august , 1999 , pca signed purchase and sales agreements with various buyers to sell approximately 405000 acres of timberland . pca has completed the sale of approximately 260000 of these acres and expects to complete the sale of the remaining acres by mid-november , 1999. .

Question: what percentage of outstanding aggregate minimum rental commitments under noncancelable operating leases are due in 2001?
Answer: 19%
Calculation: divide(4891, 25727)
part ii item 5 : market for registrant's common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities motorola's common stock is listed on the new york and chicago stock exchanges . the number of stockholders of record of motorola common stock on january 31 , 2006 was 80799 . the remainder of the response to this item incorporates by reference note 15 , ""quarterly and other financial data ( unaudited ) '' of the notes to consolidated financial statements appearing under ""item 8 : financial statements and supplementary data'' . the following table provides information with respect to acquisitions by the company of shares of its common stock during the quarter ended december 31 , 2005 . issuer purchases of equity securities ( d ) maximum number ( c ) total number ( or approximate dollar of shares purchased value ) of shares that ( a ) total number ( b ) average price as part of publicly may yet be purchased of shares paid per announced plans under the plans or period purchased ( 2 ) share ( 2 ) ( 3 ) or programs ( 1 ) programs ( 1 ) .

Table: period ( a ) total number of shares purchased ( 2 ) ( b ) average price paid per share ( 2 ) ( 3 ) ( c ) total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( 1 ) ( d ) maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( 1 ) 10/2/05 to 10/29/05 5506400 $ 21.16 5506400 $ 3367111278 10/30/05 to 11/26/05 4968768 $ 22.59 4947700 $ 3257373024 11/27/05 to 12/31/05 5824970 $ 23.26 5503500 $ 3128512934 total 16300138 $ 22.26 15957600

( 1 ) on may 18 , 2005 , the company announced that its board of directors authorized the company to repurchase up to $ 4.0 billion of its outstanding shares of common stock over a 36-month period ending on may 31 , 2008 , subject to market conditions ( the ""stock repurchase program'' ) . ( 2 ) in addition to purchases under the stock repurchase program , included in this column are transactions under the company's equity compensation plans involving the delivery to the company of 342415 shares of motorola common stock to satisfy tax withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of restricted stock granted to company employees and the surrender of 123 shares of motorola common stock to pay the option exercise price in connection with the exercise of employee stock options . ( 3 ) average price paid per share of stock repurchased under the stock repurchase program is execution price , excluding commissions paid to brokers. .

Question: in 2005 what was the percent of the total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs on or after 11/25/2005
Answer: 34.5%
Calculation: divide(5503500, 15957600)
the table below summarizes activity of rsus with performance conditions for the year ended december 31 , shares ( in thousands ) weighted average grant date fair value ( per share ) .

Table: shares ( in thousands ) weightedaverage grantdate fair value ( per share ) non-vested total as of december 31 2016 309 $ 55.94 granted 186 63.10 vested -204 ( 204 ) 46.10 forfeited -10 ( 10 ) 70.50 non-vested total as of december 31 2017 281 $ 67.33

as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to the nonvested rsus , with and without performance conditions , is expected to be recognized over the weighted-average remaining life of 1.5 years . the total fair value of rsus , with and without performance conditions , vested was $ 16 million , $ 14 million and $ 12 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . if dividends are paid with respect to shares of the company 2019s common stock before the rsus are distributed , the company credits a liability for the value of the dividends that would have been paid if the rsus were shares of company common stock . when the rsus are distributed , the company pays the participant a lump sum cash payment equal to the value of the dividend equivalents accrued . the company accrued dividend equivalents totaling less than $ 1 million , $ 1 million and $ 1 million to accumulated deficit in the accompanying consolidated statements of changes in stockholders 2019 equity for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . employee stock purchase plan the company maintains a nonqualified employee stock purchase plan ( the 201cespp 201d ) through which employee participants may use payroll deductions to acquire company common stock at the lesser of 90% ( 90 % ) of the fair market value of the common stock at either the beginning or the end of a three-month purchase period . on february 15 , 2017 , the board adopted the american water works company , inc . and its designated subsidiaries 2017 nonqualified employee stock purchase plan , which was approved by stockholders on may 12 , 2017 and took effect on august 5 , 2017 . the prior plan was terminated as to new purchases of company stock effective august 31 , 2017 . as of december 31 , 2017 , there were 2.0 million shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the espp . the espp is considered compensatory . during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , the company issued 93 thousand , 93 thousand and 98 thousand shares , respectively , under the espp. .

Question: by how much did non-vested rsu's decrease from 2016 to 2017?
Answer: -9.1%
Calculation: divide(subtract(281, 309), 309)
in direct competition with other co2 pipelines . we also compete with other interest owners in the mcelmo dome unit and the bravo dome unit for transportation of co2 to the denver city , texas market area . terminals our terminals segment includes the operations of our petroleum , chemical , ethanol and other liquids terminal facilities ( other than those included in the products pipelines segment ) and all of our coal , petroleum coke , fertilizer , steel , ores and other dry-bulk material services facilities , including all transload , engineering , conveying and other in-plant services . our terminals are located throughout the u.s . and in portions of canada . we believe the location of our facilities and our ability to provide flexibility to customers help attract new and retain existing customers at our terminals and provide us opportunities for expansion . we often classify our terminal operations based on the handling of either liquids or dry-bulk material products . in addition , we have jones act qualified product tankers that provide marine transportation of crude oil , condensate and refined products in the u.s . the following summarizes our terminals segment assets , as of december 31 , 2014 : number capacity ( mmbbl ) .

Table: number capacity ( mmbbl ) liquids terminals 39 78.0 bulk terminals 78 n/a materials services locations 8 n/a jones act qualified tankers 7 2.3

competition we are one of the largest independent operators of liquids terminals in the u.s , based on barrels of liquids terminaling capacity . our liquids terminals compete with other publicly or privately held independent liquids terminals , and terminals owned by oil , chemical and pipeline companies . our bulk terminals compete with numerous independent terminal operators , terminals owned by producers and distributors of bulk commodities , stevedoring companies and other industrial companies opting not to outsource terminal services . in some locations , competitors are smaller , independent operators with lower cost structures . our rail transloading ( material services ) operations compete with a variety of single- or multi-site transload , warehouse and terminal operators across the u.s . our jones act qualified product tankers compete with other jones act qualified vessel fleets . table of contents .

Question: what is the average capacity per liquids terminal in mmbbl?
Answer: 2
Calculation: divide(78.0, 39)
stock performance graph the following performance graph compares the cumulative total return ( including dividends ) to the holders of our common stock from december 31 , 2002 through december 31 , 2007 , with the cumulative total returns of the nyse composite index , the ftse nareit composite reit index ( the 201call reit index 201d ) , the ftse nareit healthcare equity reit index ( the 201chealthcare reit index 201d ) and the russell 1000 index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2002 in our common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , as applicable . we have included the nyse composite index in the performance graph because our common stock is listed on the nyse . we have included the other indices because we believe that they are either most representative of the industry in which we compete , or otherwise provide a fair basis for comparison with ventas , and are therefore particularly relevant to an assessment of our performance . the figures in the table below are rounded to the nearest dollar. .

Table: 12/31/2002 12/31/2003 12/31/2004 12/31/2005 12/31/2006 12/31/2007 ventas $ 100 $ 206 $ 270 $ 331 $ 457 $ 512 nyse composite index $ 100 $ 132 $ 151 $ 166 $ 200 $ 217 all reit index $ 100 $ 138 $ 181 $ 196 $ 262 $ 215 healthcare reit index $ 100 $ 154 $ 186 $ 189 $ 273 $ 279 russell 1000 index $ 100 $ 130 $ 145 $ 154 $ 178 $ 188

ventas nyse composite index all reit index healthcare reit index russell 1000 index .

Question: what was the 5 year return on the nyse composite index?
Answer: 117%
Calculation: divide(subtract(217, 100), 100)
in addition , included in the loan table are purchased distressed loans , which are loans that have evidenced significant credit deterioration subsequent to origination but prior to acquisition by citigroup . in accordance with sop 03-3 , the difference between the total expected cash flows for these loans and the initial recorded investments is recognized in income over the life of the loans using a level yield . accordingly , these loans have been excluded from the impaired loan information presented above . in addition , per sop 03-3 , subsequent decreases to the expected cash flows for a purchased distressed loan require a build of an allowance so the loan retains its level yield . however , increases in the expected cash flows are first recognized as a reduction of any previously established allowance and then recognized as income prospectively over the remaining life of the loan by increasing the loan 2019s level yield . where the expected cash flows cannot be reliably estimated , the purchased distressed loan is accounted for under the cost recovery method . the carrying amount of the purchased distressed loan portfolio at december 31 , 2009 was $ 825 million net of an allowance of $ 95 million . the changes in the accretable yield , related allowance and carrying amount net of accretable yield for 2009 are as follows : in millions of dollars accretable carrying amount of loan receivable allowance .

Table: in millions of dollars accretable yield carrying amount of loan receivable allowance beginning balance $ 92 $ 1510 $ 122 purchases ( 1 ) 14 329 2014 disposals/payments received -5 ( 5 ) -967 ( 967 ) 2014 accretion -52 ( 52 ) 52 2014 builds ( reductions ) to the allowance -21 ( 21 ) 1 -27 ( 27 ) increase to expected cash flows 10 2 2014 fx/other -11 ( 11 ) -7 ( 7 ) 2014 balance december 31 2009 ( 2 ) $ 27 $ 920 $ 95

( 1 ) the balance reported in the column 201ccarrying amount of loan receivable 201d consists of $ 87 million of purchased loans accounted for under the level-yield method and $ 242 million under the cost-recovery method . these balances represent the fair value of these loans at their acquisition date . the related total expected cash flows for the level-yield loans were $ 101 million at their acquisition dates . ( 2 ) the balance reported in the column 201ccarrying amount of loan receivable 201d consists of $ 561 million of loans accounted for under the level-yield method and $ 359 million accounted for under the cost-recovery method. .

Question: what is the percent of the purchased loans accounted for under the level-yield method included in the carrying amount of loan receivable net of purchased loans accounted for under the under the cost-recovery method
Answer: 12.8%
Calculation: divide(87, subtract(920, 242))
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2008 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock. .

Table: 12/31/2008 12/31/2009 12/31/2010 12/31/2011 12/31/2012 12/31/2013 united parcel service inc . $ 100.00 $ 107.75 $ 140.39 $ 145.84 $ 151.44 $ 221.91 standard & poor 2019s 500 index $ 100.00 $ 126.45 $ 145.49 $ 148.55 $ 172.30 $ 228.09 dow jones transportation average $ 100.00 $ 118.59 $ 150.30 $ 150.31 $ 161.56 $ 228.42

.

Question: what was the difference in percentage total cumulative return on investment for united parcel service inc . compared to the dow jones transportation average for the five years ended 12/31/2013?
Answer: -6.51%
Calculation: subtract(divide(subtract(221.91, const_100), const_100), divide(subtract(228.42, const_100), const_100))
tower cash flow , adjusted consolidated cash flow and non-tower cash flow are considered non-gaap financial measures . we are required to provide these financial metrics by the indentures for our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes , and we have included them below because we consider the indentures for these notes to be material agreements , the covenants related to tower cash flow , adjusted consolidated cash flow and non-tower cash flow to be material terms of the indentures , and information about compliance with such covenants to be material to an investor 2019s understanding of our financial results and the impact of those results on our liquidity . the following table presents tower cash flow , adjusted consolidated cash flow and non-tower cash flow for the company and its restricted subsidiaries , as defined in the indentures for the applicable notes ( in thousands ) : .

Table: tower cash flow for the three months ended december 31 2008 $ 188449 consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2008 726954 less : tower cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2008 -741565 ( 741565 ) plus : four times tower cash flow for the three months ended december 31 2008 753798 adjusted consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2008 739187 non-tower cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2008 $ -14611 ( 14611 )

.

Question: what portion of the adjusted consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 , 2008 is related to non-tower cash flow?
Answer: -2.0%
Calculation: divide(-14611, 739187)
table of content part ii item 5 . market for the registrant's common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities our common stock is traded on the new york stock exchange under the trading symbol 201chfc . 201d in september 2018 , our board of directors approved a $ 1 billion share repurchase program , which replaced all existing share repurchase programs , authorizing us to repurchase common stock in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions . the timing and amount of stock repurchases will depend on market conditions and corporate , regulatory and other relevant considerations . this program may be discontinued at any time by the board of directors . the following table includes repurchases made under this program during the fourth quarter of 2018 . period total number of shares purchased average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs maximum dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs .

Table: period total number ofshares purchased average pricepaid per share total number ofshares purchasedas part of publicly announced plans or programs maximum dollarvalue of sharesthat may yet bepurchased under the plans or programs october 2018 1360987 $ 66.34 1360987 $ 859039458 november 2018 450000 $ 61.36 450000 $ 831427985 december 2018 912360 $ 53.93 810000 $ 787613605 total for october to december 2018 2723347 2620987

during the quarter ended december 31 , 2018 , 102360 shares were withheld from certain executives and employees under the terms of our share-based compensation agreements to provide funds for the payment of payroll and income taxes due at vesting of restricted stock awards . as of february 13 , 2019 , we had approximately 97419 stockholders , including beneficial owners holding shares in street name . we intend to consider the declaration of a dividend on a quarterly basis , although there is no assurance as to future dividends since they are dependent upon future earnings , capital requirements , our financial condition and other factors. .

Question: of total repurchases in october to december 2018 , what percentage of shares purchased were part of publicly announced plans or programs?
Answer: 96.2%
Calculation: divide(2620987, 2723347)
in direct competition with other co2 pipelines . we also compete with other interest owners in the mcelmo dome unit and the bravo dome unit for transportation of co2 to the denver city , texas market area . terminals our terminals segment includes the operations of our refined petroleum product , crude oil , chemical , ethanol and other liquid terminal facilities ( other than those included in the products pipelines segment ) and all of our coal , petroleum coke , fertilizer , steel , ores and other dry-bulk terminal facilities . our terminals are located throughout the u.s . and in portions of canada . we believe the location of our facilities and our ability to provide flexibility to customers help attract new and retain existing customers at our terminals and provide expansion opportunities . we often classify our terminal operations based on the handling of either liquids or dry-bulk material products . in addition , terminals 2019 marine operations include jones act qualified product tankers that provide marine transportation of crude oil , condensate and refined petroleum products in the u.s . the following summarizes our terminals segment assets , as of december 31 , 2016 : number capacity ( mmbbl ) .

Table: number capacity ( mmbbl ) liquids terminals 51 85.2 bulk terminals 37 2014 jones act tankers 12 4.0

competition we are one of the largest independent operators of liquids terminals in north america , based on barrels of liquids terminaling capacity . our liquids terminals compete with other publicly or privately held independent liquids terminals , and terminals owned by oil , chemical , pipeline , and refining companies . our bulk terminals compete with numerous independent terminal operators , terminals owned by producers and distributors of bulk commodities , stevedoring companies and other industrial companies opting not to outsource terminaling services . in some locations , competitors are smaller , independent operators with lower cost structures . our jones act qualified product tankers compete with other jones act qualified vessel fleets. .

Question: what is the average capacity in mmbbl of liquids terminals?
Answer: 1.67
Calculation: divide(85.2, 51)
18 2015 annual report performance graph the following chart presents a comparison for the five-year period ended june 30 , 2015 , of the market performance of the company 2019s common stock with the s&p 500 index and an index of peer companies selected by the company : comparison of 5 year cumulative total return among jack henry & associates , inc. , the s&p 500 index , and a peer group the following information depicts a line graph with the following values: .

Table: 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 jkhy 100.00 127.44 148.62 205.60 263.21 290.88 peer group 100.00 136.78 148.10 174.79 239.10 301.34 s&p 500 100.00 130.69 137.81 166.20 207.10 222.47

this comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on june 30 , 2010 , and assumes reinvestments of dividends . total returns are calculated according to market capitalization of peer group members at the beginning of each period . peer companies selected are in the business of providing specialized computer software , hardware and related services to financial institutions and other businesses . companies in the peer group are aci worldwide , inc. , bottomline technology , inc. , broadridge financial solutions , cardtronics , inc. , convergys corp. , corelogic , inc. , dst systems , inc. , euronet worldwide , inc. , fair isaac corp. , fidelity national information services , inc. , fiserv , inc. , global payments , inc. , heartland payment systems , inc. , moneygram international , inc. , ss&c technologies holdings , inc. , total systems services , inc. , tyler technologies , inc. , verifone systems , inc. , and wex , inc. . micros systems , inc . was removed from the peer group as it was acquired in september 2014. .

Question: in 2010 , what was the cumulative total return of the s&p 500?
Answer: 30.69
Calculation: subtract(130.69, 100.00)