bevaya/FinQA huggingface dataset:
the following table provides the weighted average assumptions used in the black-scholes option-pricing model for grants and the resulting weighted average grant date fair value per share of stock options granted for the years ended december 31: .

Table: 2018 2017 2016 intrinsic value $ 9 $ 10 $ 18 exercise proceeds 7 11 15 income tax benefit realized 2 3 6

stock units during 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , the company granted rsus to certain employees under the 2007 plan and 2017 omnibus plan , as applicable . rsus generally vest based on continued employment with the company over periods ranging from one to three years. .

Question: what was the lowest intrinsic value per share for the calculation in the table?
Answer: 9
Calculation: table_min(intrinsic value, none)
performance graph the performance graph below shows the five-year cumulative total stockholder return on applied common stock during the period from october 31 , 2010 through october 25 , 2015 . this is compared with the cumulative total return of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and the rdg semiconductor composite index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on october 31 , 2010 in applied common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , if any . dollar amounts in the graph are rounded to the nearest whole dollar . the performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among applied materials , inc. , the s&p 500 index and the rdg semiconductor composite index *assumes $ 100 invested on 10/31/10 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . 201cs&p 201d is a registered trademark of standard & poor 2019s financial services llc , a subsidiary of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc. .

Table: 10/31/2010 10/30/2011 10/28/2012 10/27/2013 10/26/2014 10/25/2015 applied materials 100.00 104.54 90.88 155.43 188.13 150.26 s&p 500 index 100.00 108.09 124.52 158.36 185.71 195.37 rdg semiconductor composite index 100.00 110.04 104.07 136.15 172.41 170.40

dividends during each of fiscal 2015 and 2014 , applied's board of directors declared four quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.10 per share . during fiscal 2013 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.10 per share and one quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.09 per share . dividends paid during fiscal 2015 , 2014 and 2013 amounted to $ 487 million , $ 485 million and $ 456 million , respectively . applied currently anticipates that cash dividends will continue to be paid on a quarterly basis , although the declaration of any future cash dividend is at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on applied 2019s financial condition , results of operations , capital requirements , business conditions and other factors , as well as a determination by the board of directors that cash dividends are in the best interests of applied 2019s stockholders . 104 136 10/31/10 10/30/11 10/28/12 10/27/13 10/26/14 10/25/15 applied materials , inc . s&p 500 rdg semiconductor composite .

Question: what is the yearly rate of return of s&p500 if the investment occurs in 2010 and it is liquidated one year later?
Answer: 8.1%
Calculation: divide(subtract(108.09, 100), 100)
does not believe are in our and our stockholders 2019 best interest . the rights plan is intended to protect stockholders in the event of an unfair or coercive offer to acquire the company and to provide our board of directors with adequate time to evaluate unsolicited offers . the rights plan may prevent or make takeovers or unsolicited corporate transactions with respect to our company more difficult , even if stockholders may consider such transactions favorable , possibly including transactions in which stockholders might otherwise receive a premium for their shares . item 1b . unresolved staff comments item 2 . properties as of december 31 , 2016 , our significant properties used in connection with switching centers , data centers , call centers and warehouses were as follows: .

Table: approximate number approximate size in square feet switching centers 57 1400000 data centers 8 600000 call center 16 1300000 warehouses 16 500000

as of december 31 , 2016 , we leased approximately 60000 cell sites . as of december 31 , 2016 , we leased approximately 2000 t-mobile and metropcs retail locations , including stores and kiosks ranging in size from approximately 100 square feet to 17000 square feet . we currently lease office space totaling approximately 950000 square feet for our corporate headquarters in bellevue , washington . we use these offices for engineering and administrative purposes . we also lease space throughout the u.s. , totaling approximately 1200000 square feet as of december 31 , 2016 , for use by our regional offices primarily for administrative , engineering and sales purposes . item 3 . legal proceedings see note 12 2013 commitments and contingencies of the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in part ii , item 8 of this form 10-k for information regarding certain legal proceedings in which we are involved . item 4 . mine safety disclosures part ii . item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities market information our common stock is traded on the nasdaq global select market of the nasdaq stock market llc ( 201cnasdaq 201d ) under the symbol 201ctmus . 201d as of december 31 , 2016 , there were 309 registered stockholders of record of our common stock , but we estimate the total number of stockholders to be much higher as a number of our shares are held by brokers or dealers for their customers in street name. .

Question: what is the ratio of the call center to the switching centers in square feet
Answer: 0.93
Calculation: divide(1300000, 1400000)
Explanation: for every 0.93 feet of call center space there is 1 square foot of switch center space
notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 8 2014commitments and contingencies ( continued ) provide renewal options for terms of 3 to 7 additional years . leases for retail space are for terms of 5 to 20 years , the majority of which are for 10 years , and often contain multi-year renewal options . as of september 29 , 2007 , the company 2019s total future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases were $ 1.4 billion , of which $ 1.1 billion related to leases for retail space . rent expense under all operating leases , including both cancelable and noncancelable leases , was $ 151 million , $ 138 million , and $ 140 million in 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 , respectively . future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases having remaining terms in excess of one year as of september 29 , 2007 , are as follows ( in millions ) : fiscal years .

Table: 2008 $ 155 2009 172 2010 173 2011 160 2012 148 thereafter 617 total minimum lease payments $ 1425

accrued warranty and indemnifications the company offers a basic limited parts and labor warranty on its hardware products . the basic warranty period for hardware products is typically one year from the date of purchase by the end-user . the company also offers a 90-day basic warranty for its service parts used to repair the company 2019s hardware products . the company provides currently for the estimated cost that may be incurred under its basic limited product warranties at the time related revenue is recognized . factors considered in determining appropriate accruals for product warranty obligations include the size of the installed base of products subject to warranty protection , historical and projected warranty claim rates , historical and projected cost-per-claim , and knowledge of specific product failures that are outside of the company 2019s typical experience . the company assesses the adequacy of its preexisting warranty liabilities and adjusts the amounts as necessary based on actual experience and changes in future estimates . for products accounted for under subscription accounting pursuant to sop no . 97-2 , the company recognizes warranty expense as incurred . the company periodically provides updates to its applications and system software to maintain the software 2019s compliance with specifications . the estimated cost to develop such updates is accounted for as warranty costs that are recognized at the time related software revenue is recognized . factors considered in determining appropriate accruals related to such updates include the number of units delivered , the number of updates expected to occur , and the historical cost and estimated future cost of the resources necessary to develop these updates. .

Question: what is the range between the shortest and longest length of leases for retail space , in years?
Answer: 15
Calculation: subtract(20, const_5)
republic services , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) in december 2008 , the board of directors amended and restated the republic services , inc . 2006 incentive stock plan ( formerly known as the allied waste industries , inc . 2006 incentive stock plan ( the 2006 plan ) ) . allied 2019s shareholders approved the 2006 plan in may 2006 . the 2006 plan was amended and restated in december 2008 to reflect republic as the new sponsor of the plan , and that any references to shares of common stock are to shares of common stock of republic , and to adjust outstanding awards and the number of shares available under the plan to reflect the allied acquisition . the 2006 plan , as amended and restated , provided for the grant of non- qualified stock options , incentive stock options , shares of restricted stock , shares of phantom stock , stock bonuses , restricted stock units , stock appreciation rights , performance awards , dividend equivalents , cash awards , or other stock-based awards . awards granted under the 2006 plan prior to december 5 , 2008 became fully vested and nonforfeitable upon the closing of the allied acquisition . no further awards will be made under the 2006 stock options we use a lattice binomial option-pricing model to value our stock option grants . we recognize compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the award , or to the employee 2019s retirement eligible date , if earlier . expected volatility is based on the weighted average of the most recent one year volatility and a historical rolling average volatility of our stock over the expected life of the option . the risk-free interest rate is based on federal reserve rates in effect for bonds with maturity dates equal to the expected term of the option . we use historical data to estimate future option exercises , forfeitures ( at 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) for each of the periods presented ) and expected life of the options . when appropriate , separate groups of employees that have similar historical exercise behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes . the weighted-average estimated fair values of stock options granted during the years ended december 31 , 2014 , 2013 and 2012 were $ 5.74 , $ 5.27 and $ 4.77 per option , respectively , which were calculated using the following weighted-average assumptions: .

Table: 2014 2013 2012 expected volatility 27.5% ( 27.5 % ) 28.9% ( 28.9 % ) 27.8% ( 27.8 % ) risk-free interest rate 1.4% ( 1.4 % ) 0.7% ( 0.7 % ) 0.8% ( 0.8 % ) dividend yield 3.2% ( 3.2 % ) 3.2% ( 3.2 % ) 3.2% ( 3.2 % ) expected life ( in years ) 4.6 4.5 4.5 contractual life ( in years ) 7.0 7.0 7.0

.

Question: what was the percentage change in the expected volatility from 2012 to 2013
Answer: 3.95%
Calculation: divide(subtract(28.9, 27.8), 27.8)
Explanation: the percentage change is the change from one period to the next divide by the earliest period
jpmorgan chase & co./2012 annual report 167 the chart shows that for year ended december 31 , 2012 , the firm posted market risk related gains on 220 of the 261 days in this period , with gains on eight days exceeding $ 200 million . the chart includes year to date losses incurred in the synthetic credit portfolio . cib and credit portfolio posted market risk-related gains on 254 days in the period . the inset graph looks at those days on which the firm experienced losses and depicts the amount by which var exceeded the actual loss on each of those days . of the losses that were sustained on the 41 days of the 261 days in the trading period , the firm sustained losses that exceeded the var measure on three of those days . these losses in excess of the var all occurred in the second quarter of 2012 and were due to the adverse effect of market movements on risk positions in the synthetic credit portfolio held by cio . during the year ended december 31 , 2012 , cib and credit portfolio experienced seven loss days ; none of the losses on those days exceeded their respective var measures . other risk measures debit valuation adjustment sensitivity the following table provides information about the gross sensitivity of dva to a one-basis-point increase in jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spreads . this sensitivity represents the impact from a one-basis-point parallel shift in jpmorgan chase 2019s entire credit curve . however , the sensitivity at a single point in time multiplied by the change in credit spread at a single maturity point may not be representative of the actual dva gain or loss realized within a period . the actual results reflect the movement in credit spreads across various maturities , which typically do not move in a parallel fashion , and is the product of a constantly changing exposure profile , among other factors . debit valuation adjustment sensitivity ( in millions ) one basis-point increase in jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spread .

Table: ( in millions ) one basis-point increase injpmorgan chase 2019s credit spread december 31 2012 $ 34 december 31 2011 35

economic-value stress testing along with var , stress testing is important in measuring and controlling risk . while var reflects the risk of loss due to adverse changes in markets using recent historical market behavior as an indicator of losses , stress testing captures the firm 2019s exposure to unlikely but plausible events in abnormal markets . the firm runs weekly stress tests on market-related risks across the lines of business using multiple scenarios that assume significant changes in risk factors such as credit spreads , equity prices , interest rates , currency rates or commodity prices . the framework uses a grid-based approach , which calculates multiple magnitudes of stress for both market rallies and market sell-offs for .

Question: what was the percentage change in the one basis-point increase in jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spread from 2011 to 2012
Answer: -2.86%
Calculation: divide(subtract(35, 34), 34)
federal realty investment trust schedule iii summary of real estate and accumulated depreciation 2014continued three years ended december 31 , 2007 reconciliation of accumulated depreciation and amortization ( in thousands ) .

Table: balance december 31 2004 $ 595338 additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense 83656 deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property -15244 ( 15244 ) balance december 31 2005 $ 663750 additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense 89564 deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property -12807 ( 12807 ) balance december 31 2006 $ 740507 additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense 96454 deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property -80258 ( 80258 ) balance december 31 2007 $ 756703

.

Question: what is the increase in the deductions during 2006 and 2007 , in thousands of dollars?
Answer: 67451
Calculation: subtract(80258, 12807)
Explanation: it is the difference between those deduction values .
stock performance graph : the graph below shows the cumulative total shareholder return assuming the investment of $ 100 , on december 31 , 2010 , and the reinvestment of dividends thereafter , if any , in the company's common stock versus the standard and poor's s&p 500 retail index ( "s&p 500 retail index" ) and the standard and poor's s&p 500 index ( "s&p 500" ) . .

Table: company/index december 31 , 2010 december 31 , 2011 december 31 , 2012 december 31 , 2013 december 31 , 2014 december 31 , 2015 o'reilly automotive inc . $ 100 $ 132 $ 148 $ 213 $ 319 $ 419 s&p 500 retail index 100 103 128 185 203 252 s&p 500 $ 100 $ 100 $ 113 $ 147 $ 164 $ 163

.

Question: what is the roi of an investment in the o'reilly automotive inc . from 2010 to 2011?
Answer: 32%
Calculation: divide(subtract(132, 100), 100)
stock performance graph the following graph sets forth the cumulative total shareholder return on our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock as compared with the cumulative total return of the companies listed in the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and a peer group of companies comprised of cbs corporation class b common stock , news corporation class a common stock , scripps network interactive , inc. , time warner , inc. , viacom , inc . class b common stock and the walt disney company . the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on september 18 , 2008 , the date upon which our common stock began trading , in each of our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the stock of our peer group companies , including reinvestment of dividends , for the period september 18 , 2008 through december 31 , 2008 and the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2010 , 2011 , and 2012 . december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 .

Table: december 312008 december 312009 december 312010 december 312011 december 312012 disca $ 102.53 $ 222.09 $ 301.96 $ 296.67 $ 459.67 discb $ 78.53 $ 162.82 $ 225.95 $ 217.56 $ 327.11 disck $ 83.69 $ 165.75 $ 229.31 $ 235.63 $ 365.63 s&p 500 $ 74.86 $ 92.42 $ 104.24 $ 104.23 $ 118.21 peer group $ 68.79 $ 100.70 $ 121.35 $ 138.19 $ 190.58

equity compensation plan information information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans will be set forth in our definitive proxy statement for our 2013 annual meeting of stockholders under the caption 201csecurities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans , 201d which is incorporated herein by reference. .

Question: by what percent did the c series outperform the s&p 500 over 5 years?
Answer: 209%
Calculation: divide(subtract(365.63, 118.21), 118.21)
jpmorgan chase & co./2018 form 10-k 41 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co . ( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index . the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced equity benchmark in the united states of america ( 201cu.s . 201d ) , consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s . and is composed of leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts . the s&p financial index is an index of financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 . the firm is a component of all three industry indices . the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2013 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices . the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested . december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 .

Table: december 31 ( in dollars ) 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 jpmorgan chase $ 100.00 $ 109.88 $ 119.07 $ 160.23 $ 203.07 $ 189.57 kbw bank index 100.00 109.36 109.90 141.23 167.49 137.82 s&p financial index 100.00 115.18 113.38 139.17 169.98 147.82 s&p 500 index 100.00 113.68 115.24 129.02 157.17 150.27

december 31 , ( in dollars ) .

Question: what was the average uncompounded annual return for jpmorgan chase for the five year period?
Answer: 37.9%
Calculation: divide(189.57, const_5)
3 . dividends from subsidiaries and affiliates cash dividends received from consolidated subsidiaries and from affiliates accounted for by the equity method were as follows ( in millions ) : .

Table: 2003 2002 2001 subsidiaries $ 807 $ 771 $ 1038 affiliates 43 44 21

4 . guarantees and letters of credit guarantees 2014in connection with certain of its project financing , acquisition , and power purchase agreements , the company has expressly undertaken limited obligations and commitments , most of which will only be effective or will be terminated upon the occurrence of future events . these obligations and commitments , excluding those collateralized by letter of credit and other obligations discussed below , were limited as of december 31 , 2003 , by the terms of the agreements , to an aggregate of approximately $ 515 million representing 55 agreements with individual exposures ranging from less than $ 1 million up to $ 100 million . of this amount , $ 147 million represents credit enhancements for non-recourse debt , and $ 38 million commitments to fund its equity in projects currently under development or in construction . letters of credit 2014at december 31 , 2003 , the company had $ 89 million in letters of credit outstanding representing 9 agreements with individual exposures ranging from less than $ 1 million up to $ 36 million , which operate to guarantee performance relating to certain project development and construction activities and subsidiary operations . the company pays a letter of credit fee ranging from 0.5% ( 0.5 % ) to 5.00% ( 5.00 % ) per annum on the outstanding amounts . in addition , the company had $ 4 million in surety bonds outstanding at december 31 , 2003. .

Question: what was the average dividend or cash dividends received from consolidated subsidiaries and from affiliates accounted for by the equity method in millions in 2002?
Answer: 17.5
Calculation: divide(771, 44)
shareholder return performance presentation the graph presented below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on state street's common stock to the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over a five-year period . the cumulative total shareholder return assumes the investment of $ 100 in state street common stock and in each index on december 31 , 2007 at the closing price on the last trading day of 2007 , and also assumes reinvestment of common stock dividends . the s&p financial index is a publicly available measure of 80 of the standard & poor's 500 companies , representing 26 diversified financial services companies , 22 insurance companies , 17 real estate companies and 15 banking companies . comparison of five-year cumulative total shareholder return .

Table: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 state street corporation $ 100 $ 49 $ 55 $ 58 $ 52 $ 61 s&p 500 index 100 63 80 92 94 109 s&p financial index 100 45 52 59 49 63

.

Question: what is the roi of an investment in state street corporation from 2007 to 2009?
Answer: -45.0%
Calculation: divide(subtract(55, 100), 100)