bevaya/FinQA huggingface dataset:
12 . brokerage receivables and brokerage payables the company has receivables and payables for financial instruments sold to and purchased from brokers , dealers and customers , which arise in the ordinary course of business . citi is exposed to risk of loss from the inability of brokers , dealers or customers to pay for purchases or to deliver the financial instruments sold , in which case citi would have to sell or purchase the financial instruments at prevailing market prices . credit risk is reduced to the extent that an exchange or clearing organization acts as a counterparty to the transaction and replaces the broker , dealer or customer in question . citi seeks to protect itself from the risks associated with customer activities by requiring customers to maintain margin collateral in compliance with regulatory and internal guidelines . margin levels are monitored daily , and customers deposit additional collateral as required . where customers cannot meet collateral requirements , citi may liquidate sufficient underlying financial instruments to bring the customer into compliance with the required margin level . exposure to credit risk is impacted by market volatility , which may impair the ability of clients to satisfy their obligations to citi . credit limits are established and closely monitored for customers and for brokers and dealers engaged in forwards , futures and other transactions deemed to be credit sensitive . brokerage receivables and brokerage payables consisted of the following: .

Table: in millions of dollars december 31 , 2018 december 31 , 2017 receivables from customers $ 14415 $ 19215 receivables from brokers dealers and clearing organizations 21035 19169 total brokerage receivables ( 1 ) $ 35450 $ 38384 payables to customers $ 40273 $ 38741 payables to brokers dealers and clearing organizations 24298 22601 total brokerage payables ( 1 ) $ 64571 $ 61342

total brokerage payables ( 1 ) $ 64571 $ 61342 ( 1 ) includes brokerage receivables and payables recorded by citi broker-dealer entities that are accounted for in accordance with the aicpa accounting guide for brokers and dealers in securities as codified in asc 940-320. .

Question: what percentage of total brokerage payables at december 31 , 2018 where receivables from customers?
Answer: 22%
Calculation: divide(14415, 64571)
corporate/other corporate/other includes global staff functions ( includes finance , risk , human resources , legal and compliance ) and other corporate expense , global operations and technology ( o&t ) , residual corporate treasury and corporate items . at december 31 , 2009 , this segment had approximately $ 230 billion of assets , consisting primarily of the company 2019s liquidity portfolio , including $ 110 billion of cash and cash equivalents. .

Table: in millions of dollars 2009 2008 2007 net interest revenue $ -1663 ( 1663 ) $ -2680 ( 2680 ) $ -2008 ( 2008 ) non-interest revenue -8893 ( 8893 ) 422 -302 ( 302 ) total revenues net of interest expense $ -10556 ( 10556 ) $ -2258 ( 2258 ) $ -2310 ( 2310 ) total operating expenses $ 1420 $ 510 $ 1813 provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims -1 ( 1 ) 1 -3 ( 3 ) ( loss ) from continuing operations before taxes $ -11975 ( 11975 ) $ -2769 ( 2769 ) $ -4120 ( 4120 ) income taxes ( benefits ) -4369 ( 4369 ) -587 ( 587 ) -1446 ( 1446 ) ( loss ) from continuing operations $ -7606 ( 7606 ) $ -2182 ( 2182 ) $ -2674 ( 2674 ) income ( loss ) from discontinued operations net of taxes -445 ( 445 ) 4002 708 net income ( loss ) before attribution of noncontrolling interests $ -8051 ( 8051 ) $ 1820 $ -1966 ( 1966 ) net income attributable to noncontrolling interests 2014 2014 2 net income ( loss ) $ -8051 ( 8051 ) $ 1820 $ -1968 ( 1968 )

2009 vs . 2008 revenues , net of interest expense declined , primarily due to the pretax loss on debt extinguishment related to the repayment of the $ 20 billion of tarp trust preferred securities and the pretax loss in connection with the exit from the loss-sharing agreement with the u.s . government . revenues also declined , due to the absence of the 2008 sale of citigroup global services limited recorded in o&t . this was partially offset by a pretax gain related to the exchange offers , revenues and higher intersegment eliminations . operating expenses increased , primarily due to intersegment eliminations and increases in compensation , partially offset by lower repositioning reserves . 2008 vs . 2007 revenues , net of interest expense increased primarily due to the gain in 2007 on the sale of certain corporate-owned assets and higher intersegment eliminations , partially offset by improved treasury hedging activities . operating expenses declined , primarily due to lower restructuring charges in 2008 as well as reductions in incentive compensation and benefits expense. .

Question: what was the percentage change in total operating expenses between 2007 and 2008?
Answer: -72%
Calculation: divide(subtract(510, 1813), 1813)
a valuation allowance is provided against deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized . changes to our valuation allowance during the year ended december 31 , 2017 , the 2016 fiscal transition period and the years ended may 31 , 2016 and 2015 are summarized below ( in thousands ) : .

Table: balance at may 31 2014 $ -7199 ( 7199 ) utilization of foreign net operating loss carryforwards 3387 other -11 ( 11 ) balance at may 31 2015 -3823 ( 3823 ) allowance for foreign income tax credit carryforward -7140 ( 7140 ) allowance for domestic net operating loss carryforwards -4474 ( 4474 ) allowance for domestic net unrealized capital loss -1526 ( 1526 ) release of allowance of domestic capital loss carryforward 1746 other 98 balance at may 31 2016 -15119 ( 15119 ) allowance for domestic net operating loss carryforwards -1504 ( 1504 ) release of allowance of domestic net unrealized capital loss 12 balance at december 31 2016 -16611 ( 16611 ) allowance for foreign net operating loss carryforwards -6469 ( 6469 ) allowance for domestic net operating loss carryforwards -3793 ( 3793 ) allowance for state credit carryforwards -685 ( 685 ) rate change on domestic net operating loss and capital loss carryforwards 3868 utilization of foreign income tax credit carryforward 7140 balance at december 31 2017 $ -16550 ( 16550 )

the increase in the valuation allowance related to net operating loss carryforwards of $ 10.3 million for the year ended december 31 , 2017 relates primarily to carryforward assets recorded as part of the acquisition of active network . the increase in the valuation allowance related to domestic net operating loss carryforwards of $ 1.5 million and $ 4.5 million for the 2016 fiscal transition period and the year ended may 31 , 2016 , respectively , relates to acquired carryforwards from the merger with heartland . foreign net operating loss carryforwards of $ 43.2 million and domestic net operating loss carryforwards of $ 28.9 million at december 31 , 2017 will expire between december 31 , 2026 and december 31 , 2037 if not utilized . we conduct business globally and file income tax returns in the domestic federal jurisdiction and various state and foreign jurisdictions . in the normal course of business , we are subject to examination by taxing authorities around the world . we are no longer subjected to state income tax examinations for years ended on or before may 31 , 2008 , u.s . federal income tax examinations for years ended on or before december 31 , 2013 and u.k . federal income tax examinations for years ended on or before may 31 , 2014 . 88 2013 global payments inc . | 2017 form 10-k annual report .

Question: what was the net change in the valuation allowance in thousands between 2016 and 2017?
Answer: 61
Calculation: subtract(-16550, -16611)
shareholder return performance the line graph below compares the annual percentage change in ball corporation fffds cumulative total shareholder return on its common stock with the cumulative total return of the dow jones containers & packaging index and the s&p composite 500 stock index for the five-year period ended december 31 , 2011 . it assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2006 , and that all dividends were reinvested . the dow jones containers & packaging index total return has been weighted by market capitalization . total return to stockholders ( assumes $ 100 investment on 12/31/06 ) total return analysis .

Table: 12/31/2006 12/31/2007 12/31/2008 12/31/2009 12/31/2010 12/31/2011 ball corporation $ 100.00 $ 104.05 $ 97.04 $ 121.73 $ 161.39 $ 170.70 dj us containers & packaging $ 100.00 $ 106.73 $ 66.91 $ 93.98 $ 110.23 $ 110.39 s&p 500 $ 100.00 $ 105.49 $ 66.46 $ 84.05 $ 96.71 $ 98.75

copyright a9 2012 standard & poor fffds , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm ) copyright a9 2012 dow jones & company . all rights reserved. .

Question: what was the five year return on ball corporation stock , in dollars per share?
Answer: 70.70
Calculation: subtract(170.70, 100.00)
allowance for doubtful accounts is as follows: .

Table: 2010 2009 2008 balance at beginning of year $ 160 $ 133 $ 86 provision 38 54 65 amounts written off -13 ( 13 ) -27 ( 27 ) -18 ( 18 ) balance at end of year $ 185 $ 160 $ 133

discontinued operations during the fourth quarter of 2009 , schlumberger recorded a net $ 22 million charge related to the resolution of a customs assessment pertaining to its former offshore contract drilling business , as well as the resolution of certain contingencies associated with other previously disposed of businesses . this amount is included in income ( loss ) from discontinued operations in the consolidated statement of income . during the first quarter of 2008 , schlumberger recorded a gain of $ 38 million related to the resolution of a contingency associated with a previously disposed of business . this gain is included in income ( loss ) from discon- tinued operations in the consolidated statement of income . part ii , item 8 .

Question: in 2010 , what was the provision for doubtful accounts as a percentage of total allowance for doubtful accounts?
Answer: 24%
Calculation: divide(38, 160)
we are exposed to market risk stemming from changes in interest and foreign exchange rates and commod- ity and equity prices . changes in these factors could cause fl uctuations in our earnings and cash fl ows . in the normal course of business , we actively manage our exposure to these market risks by entering into vari- ous hedging transactions , authorized under established policies that place clear controls on these activities . th e counterparties in these transactions are generally highly rated institutions . we establish credit limits for each counterparty . our hedging transactions include but are not limited to a variety of derivative fi nancial instruments . for information on interest rate , foreign exchange , commodity price , and equity instrument risk , please see note 7 to the consolidated financial statements on page 61 of this report . value at risk th e estimates in the table below are intended to mea- sure the maximum potential fair value we could lose in one day from adverse changes in market interest rates , foreign exchange rates , commodity prices , and equity prices under normal market conditions . a monte carlo value-at-risk ( var ) methodology was used to quantify the market risk for our exposures . th e models assumed normal market conditions and used a 95 percent confi - dence level . th e var calculation used historical interest and for- eign exchange rates , and commodity and equity prices from the past year to estimate the potential volatility and correlation of these rates in the future . th e market data were drawn from the riskmetrics 2122 data set . th e calculations are not intended to represent actual losses in fair value that we expect to incur . further , since the hedging instrument ( the derivative ) inversely cor- relates with the underlying exposure , we would expect that any loss or gain in the fair value of our derivatives would be generally off set by an increase or decrease in the fair value of the underlying exposure . th e positions included in the calculations were : debt ; investments ; interest rate swaps ; foreign exchange forwards ; com- modity swaps , futures and options ; and equity instru- ments . th e calculations do not include the underlying foreign exchange and commodities or equity-related positions that are off set by these market-risk-sensitive instruments . th e table below presents the estimated maximum potential var arising from a one-day loss in fair value for our interest rate , foreign currency , commodity , and equity market-risk-sensitive instruments outstanding as of may 28 , 2017 , and may 29 , 2016 , and the average fair value impact during the year ended may 28 , 2017. .

Table: in millions fair value impact may 28 2017 fair value impact averageduringfiscal 2017 fair value impact may 29 2016 interest rate instruments $ 25.1 $ 26.5 $ 33.3 foreign currency instruments 24.6 22.9 27.6 commodity instruments 3.2 2.5 3.3 equity instruments 1.3 1.4 1.7

quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk 44 general mills .

Question: what is the total average fair value impact of all the instruments?
Answer: 53.3
Calculation: add(add(add(26.5, 22.9), 2.5), 1.4)
visa inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) september 30 , 2008 ( in millions , except as noted ) secured notes series b-1995 lease agreement in september 1995 , a real estate partnership owned jointly by visa u.s.a . and visa international issued notes that are secured by certain office properties and facilities in california which are used by the company through a lease financing of net-leased office space ( 201c1995 lease agreement 201d ) . series b of these notes , totaling $ 27 million , were issued with an interest rate of 7.83% ( 7.83 % ) and a stated maturity of september 15 , 2015 , and are payable monthly with interest-only payments for the first ten years and payments of interest and principal for the remainder of the term . series b debt issuance costs of $ 0.3 million and a $ 0.8 million loss on termination of a forward contract are being amortized on a straight- line basis over the life of the notes . the settlement entered into in connection with visa check/ master money antitrust litigation had triggered an event of default under the 1995 lease agreement . accordingly , the related debt was classified as a current liability at september 30 , 2007 . in may 2008 , visa inc. , visa u.s.a . and visa international executed an amendment and waiver to the 1995 lease agreement ( 201camended 1995 lease agreement 201d ) , curing the default and including a guarantee of remaining obligations under the agreement by visa inc . the interest terms remained unchanged . future principal payments future principal payments on the company 2019s outstanding debt are as follows: .

Table: fiscal ( in millions ) 2009 52 2010 12 2011 12 2012 13 2013 8 thereafter 11 total $ 108

u.s . commercial paper program visa international maintains a u.s . commercial paper program to support its working capital requirements and for general corporate purposes . this program allows the company to issue up to $ 500 million of unsecured debt securities , with maturities up to 270 days from the date of issuance and at interest rates generally extended to companies with comparable credit ratings . at september 30 , 2008 , the company had no outstanding obligations under this program . revolving credit facilities on february 15 , 2008 , visa inc . entered into a $ 3.0 billion five-year revolving credit facility ( the 201cfebruary 2008 agreement 201d ) which replaced visa international 2019s $ 2.25 billion credit facility . the february 2008 agreement matures on february 15 , 2013 and contains covenants and events of defaults customary for facilities of this type . at september 30 , 2008 , the company is in compliance with all covenants with respect to the revolving credit facility. .

Question: in 2008 what was the percent of the total future principal payments on the company 2019s outstanding debt that was due in 2009
Answer: 48%
Calculation: divide(52, 108)
entergy mississippi , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to lower profit on joint account sales and reduced capacity revenue from the municipal energy agency of mississippi . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 152.5 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates , partially offset by a decrease of $ 43 million in gross wholesale revenues due to a decrease in net generation and purchases in excess of decreased net area demand resulting in less energy available for resale sales coupled with a decrease in system agreement remedy receipts . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power , partially offset by decreased demand and decreased recovery from customers of deferred fuel costs . other regulatory charges increased primarily due to increased recovery through the grand gulf rider of grand gulf capacity costs due to higher rates and increased recovery of costs associated with the power management recovery rider . there is no material effect on net income due to quarterly adjustments to the power management recovery rider . 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 . amount ( in millions ) .

Table: amount ( in millions ) 2006 net revenue $ 466.1 base revenue 7.9 volume/weather 4.5 transmission revenue 4.1 transmission equalization 4.0 reserve equalization 3.8 attala costs -10.2 ( 10.2 ) other 6.7 2007 net revenue $ 486.9

the base revenue variance is primarily due to a formula rate plan increase effective july 2007 . the formula rate plan filing is discussed further in "state and local rate regulation" below . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to increased electricity usage primarily in the residential and commercial sectors , including the effect of more favorable weather on billed electric sales in 2007 compared to 2006 . billed electricity usage increased 214 gwh . the increase in usage was partially offset by decreased usage in the industrial sector . the transmission revenue variance is due to higher rates and the addition of new transmission customers in late 2006 . the transmission equalization variance is primarily due to a revision made in 2006 of transmission equalization receipts among entergy companies . the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to a revision in 2006 of reserve equalization payments among entergy companies due to a ferc ruling regarding the inclusion of interruptible loads in reserve .

Question: what is the percent change between net revenue in 2006 and 2007?
Answer: 4.5%
Calculation: divide(subtract(486.9, 466.1), 466.1)
fidelity national information services , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements - ( continued ) the following summarizes the aggregate maturities of our debt and capital leases on stated contractual maturities , excluding unamortized non-cash bond premiums and discounts net of $ 30 million as of december 31 , 2017 ( in millions ) : .

Table: total 2018 $ 1045 2019 44 2020 1157 2021 1546 2022 705 thereafter 4349 total principal payments 8846 debt issuance costs net of accumulated amortization -53 ( 53 ) total long-term debt $ 8793

there are no mandatory principal payments on the revolving loan and any balance outstanding on the revolving loan will be due and payable at its scheduled maturity date , which occurs at august 10 , 2021 . fis may redeem the 2018 notes , 2020 notes , 2021 notes , 2021 euro notes , 2022 notes , 2022 gbp notes , 2023 notes , 2024 notes , 2024 euro notes , 2025 notes , 2026 notes , and 2046 notes at its option in whole or in part , at any time and from time to time , at a redemption price equal to the greater of 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount to be redeemed and a make-whole amount calculated as described in the related indenture in each case plus accrued and unpaid interest to , but excluding , the date of redemption , provided no make-whole amount will be paid for redemptions of the 2020 notes , the 2021 notes , the 2021 euro notes and the 2022 gbp notes during the one month prior to their maturity , the 2022 notes during the two months prior to their maturity , the 2023 notes , the 2024 notes , the 2024 euro notes , the 2025 notes , and the 2026 notes during the three months prior to their maturity , and the 2046 notes during the six months prior to their maturity . debt issuance costs of $ 53 million , net of accumulated amortization , remain capitalized as of december 31 , 2017 , related to all of the above outstanding debt . we monitor the financial stability of our counterparties on an ongoing basis . the lender commitments under the undrawn portions of the revolving loan are comprised of a diversified set of financial institutions , both domestic and international . the failure of any single lender to perform its obligations under the revolving loan would not adversely impact our ability to fund operations . the fair value of the company 2019s long-term debt is estimated to be approximately $ 156 million higher than the carrying value as of december 31 , 2017 . this estimate is based on quoted prices of our senior notes and trades of our other debt in close proximity to december 31 , 2017 , which are considered level 2-type measurements . this estimate is subjective in nature and involves uncertainties and significant judgment in the interpretation of current market data . therefore , the values presented are not necessarily indicative of amounts the company could realize or settle currently. .

Question: what percent of total long-term debt is due after 2022?
Answer: 49%
Calculation: divide(4349, 8793)
item 5 . market for the registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following graph compares annual total return of our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and our peer group ( 201cloews peer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2016 . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , the s&p 500 index and the loews peer group was $ 100 on december 31 , 2011 and that all dividends were reinvested. .

Table: 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 loews common stock 100.0 108.91 129.64 113.59 104.47 128.19 s&p 500 index 100.0 116.00 153.57 174.60 177.01 198.18 loews peer group ( a ) 100.0 113.39 142.85 150.44 142.44 165.34

( a ) the loews peer group consists of the following companies that are industry competitors of our principal operating subsidiaries : chubb limited ( name change from ace limited after it acquired the chubb corporation on january 15 , 2016 ) , w.r . berkley corporation , the chubb corporation ( included through january 15 , 2016 when it was acquired by ace limited ) , energy transfer partners l.p. , ensco plc , the hartford financial services group , inc. , kinder morgan energy partners , l.p . ( included through november 26 , 2014 when it was acquired by kinder morgan inc. ) , noble corporation , spectra energy corp , transocean ltd . and the travelers companies , inc . dividend information we have paid quarterly cash dividends in each year since 1967 . regular dividends of $ 0.0625 per share of loews common stock were paid in each calendar quarter of 2016 and 2015. .

Question: what is the roi of an investment in loews common stock from 2011 to 2012?
Answer: 8.9%
Calculation: divide(subtract(108.91, const_100), const_100)