bevaya/FinQA huggingface dataset:
jpmorgan chase & co./2015 annual report 233 note 11 2013 noninterest expense for details on noninterest expense , see consolidated statements of income on page 176 . included within other expense is the following : year ended december 31 , ( in millions ) 2015 2014 2013 .

Table: year ended december 31 ( in millions ) 2015 2014 2013 legal expense $ 2969 $ 2883 $ 11143 federal deposit insurance corporation-related ( 201cfdic 201d ) expense 1227 1037 1496

federal deposit insurance corporation-related ( 201cfdic 201d ) expense 1227 1037 1496 note 12 2013 securities securities are classified as trading , afs or held-to-maturity ( 201chtm 201d ) . securities classified as trading assets are discussed in note 3 . predominantly all of the firm 2019s afs and htm investment securities ( the 201cinvestment securities portfolio 201d ) are held by treasury and cio in connection with its asset-liability management objectives . at december 31 , 2015 , the investment securities portfolio consisted of debt securities with an average credit rating of aa+ ( based upon external ratings where available , and where not available , based primarily upon internal ratings which correspond to ratings as defined by s&p and moody 2019s ) . afs securities are carried at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets . unrealized gains and losses , after any applicable hedge accounting adjustments , are reported as net increases or decreases to accumulated other comprehensive income/ ( loss ) . the specific identification method is used to determine realized gains and losses on afs securities , which are included in securities gains/ ( losses ) on the consolidated statements of income . htm debt securities , which management has the intent and ability to hold until maturity , are carried at amortized cost on the consolidated balance sheets . for both afs and htm debt securities , purchase discounts or premiums are generally amortized into interest income over the contractual life of the security . during 2014 , the firm transferred u.s . government agency mortgage-backed securities and obligations of u.s . states and municipalities with a fair value of $ 19.3 billion from afs to htm . these securities were transferred at fair value , and the transfer was a non-cash transaction . aoci included net pretax unrealized losses of $ 9 million on the securities at the date of transfer . the transfer reflected the firm 2019s intent to hold the securities to maturity in order to reduce the impact of price volatility on aoci and certain capital measures under basel iii. .

Question: what was the percent of the other expenses federal deposit insurance corporation-related ( 201cfdic 201d ) expense as a percent of the legal expense
Answer: 41.3%
Calculation: divide(1227, 2969)
humana inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during 2007 was $ 133.9 million , compared with $ 133.7 million during 2006 and $ 57.8 million during 2005 . cash received from stock option exercises for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 totaled $ 62.7 million , $ 49.2 million , and $ 36.4 million , respectively . total compensation expense related to nonvested options not yet recognized was $ 23.6 million at december 31 , 2007 . we expect to recognize this compensation expense over a weighted average period of approximately 1.6 years . restricted stock awards restricted stock awards are granted with a fair value equal to the market price of our common stock on the date of grant . compensation expense is recorded straight-line over the vesting period , generally three years from the date of grant . the weighted average grant date fair value of our restricted stock awards was $ 63.59 , $ 54.36 , and $ 32.81 for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 , respectively . activity for our restricted stock awards was as follows for the year ended december 31 , 2007 : shares weighted average grant-date fair value .

Table: shares weighted average grant-date fair value nonvested restricted stock at december 31 2006 1107455 $ 45.86 granted 852353 63.59 vested -51206 ( 51206 ) 56.93 forfeited -63624 ( 63624 ) 49.65 nonvested restricted stock at december 31 2007 1844978 $ 53.61

the fair value of shares vested during the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 was $ 3.4 million , $ 2.3 million , and $ 0.6 million , respectively . total compensation expense related to nonvested restricted stock awards not yet recognized was $ 44.7 million at december 31 , 2007 . we expect to recognize this compensation expense over a weighted average period of approximately 1.4 years . there are no other contractual terms covering restricted stock awards once vested. .

Question: what is the increase observed in the weighted average grant date fair value of the restricted stocks in 2006 and 2007?
Answer: 16.97%
Calculation: subtract(divide(63.59, 54.36), const_1)
Explanation: it is the 2007 weighted average grant date fair value divided by the 2006's , then turned into a percentage to represent the increase .
table of contents company stock performance the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index as of the market close on september 30 , 2008 . data points on the graph are annual . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . fiscal year ending september 30 . copyright 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . copyright 2013 dow jones & co . all rights reserved . *$ 100 invested on 9/30/08 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 .

Table: september 30 2008 september 30 2009 september 30 2010 september 30 2011 september 30 2012 september 30 2013 apple inc . $ 100 $ 163 $ 250 $ 335 $ 589 $ 431 s&p 500 index $ 100 $ 93 $ 103 $ 104 $ 135 $ 161 s&p computer hardware index $ 100 $ 118 $ 140 $ 159 $ 255 $ 197 dow jones us technology supersector index $ 100 $ 111 $ 124 $ 128 $ 166 $ 175

.

Question: what is the 6 year total shareholder return on apple . inc.?
Answer: 331%
Calculation: divide(subtract(431, 100), 100)
( 1 ) includes shares repurchased through our publicly announced share repurchase program and shares tendered to pay the exercise price and tax withholding on employee stock options . shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2004 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 2004 20092008200720062005 s&p 500 ups dj transport .

Table: 12/31/04 12/31/05 12/31/06 12/31/07 12/31/08 12/31/09 united parcel service inc . $ 100.00 $ 89.49 $ 91.06 $ 87.88 $ 70.48 $ 75.95 s&p 500 index $ 100.00 $ 104.91 $ 121.48 $ 128.15 $ 80.74 $ 102.11 dow jones transportation average $ 100.00 $ 111.65 $ 122.61 $ 124.35 $ 97.72 $ 115.88

.

Question: what is the roi of an investment in ups in 2004 and sold in 2006?
Answer: -8.9%
Calculation: divide(subtract(91.06, const_100), const_100)
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements computed on a rolling 12 month basis . as of december 31 , 2008 , entergy louisiana was in compliance with these provisions . as of december 31 , 2008 , entergy louisiana had future minimum lease payments ( reflecting an overall implicit rate of 7.45% ( 7.45 % ) ) in connection with the waterford 3 sale and leaseback transactions , which are recorded as long-term debt , as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .

Table: amount ( in thousands ) 2009 $ 32452 2010 35138 2011 50421 2012 39067 2013 26301 years thereafter 137858 total 321237 less : amount representing interest 73512 present value of net minimum lease payments $ 247725

grand gulf lease obligations in december 1988 , in two separate but substantially identical transactions , system energy sold and leased back undivided ownership interests in grand gulf for the aggregate sum of $ 500 million . the interests represent approximately 11.5% ( 11.5 % ) of grand gulf . the leases expire in 2015 . under certain circumstances , system entergy may repurchase the leased interests prior to the end of the term of the leases . at the end of the lease terms , system energy has the option to repurchase the leased interests in grand gulf at fair market value or to renew the leases for either fair market value or , under certain conditions , a fixed rate . in may 2004 , system energy caused the grand gulf lessors to refinance the outstanding bonds that they had issued to finance the purchase of their undivided interest in grand gulf . the refinancing is at a lower interest rate , and system energy's lease payments have been reduced to reflect the lower interest costs . system energy is required to report the sale-leaseback as a financing transaction in its financial statements . for financial reporting purposes , system energy expenses the interest portion of the lease obligation and the plant depreciation . however , operating revenues include the recovery of the lease payments because the transactions are accounted for as a sale and leaseback for ratemaking purposes . consistent with a recommendation contained in a ferc audit report , system energy initially recorded as a net regulatory asset the difference between the recovery of the lease payments and the amounts expensed for interest and depreciation and continues to record this difference as a regulatory asset or liability on an ongoing basis , resulting in a zero net balance for the regulatory asset at the end of the lease term . the amount of this net regulatory asset was $ 19.2 million and $ 36.6 million as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively. .

Question: what portion of the future minimum lease payments for entergy louisiana will be used for interest payments?
Answer: 22.9%
Calculation: divide(73512, 321237)
jpmorgan chase & co./2015 annual report 67 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co . ( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index . the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced united states of america ( 201cu.s . 201d ) equity benchmark consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s . and is composed of 24 leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts . the s&p financial index is an index of 87 financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 . the firm is a component of all three industry indices . the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2010 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices . the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested . december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 .

Table: december 31 ( in dollars ) 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 jpmorgan chase $ 100.00 $ 80.03 $ 108.98 $ 148.98 $ 163.71 $ 177.40 kbw bank index 100.00 76.82 102.19 140.77 153.96 154.71 s&p financial index 100.00 82.94 106.78 144.79 166.76 164.15 s&p 500 index 100.00 102.11 118.44 156.78 178.22 180.67

december 31 , ( in dollars ) .

Question: did jpmorgan chase outperform the kbw bank index?
Answer: yes
Calculation: greater(177.40, 154.71)
note 4 : property , plant and equipment the following table summarizes the major classes of property , plant and equipment by category as of december 31 : 2015 2014 range of remaining useful weighted average useful life utility plant : land and other non-depreciable assets . . . . . . . . . . $ 141 $ 137 sources of supply . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 705 681 12 to 127 years 51 years treatment and pumping facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3070 2969 3 to 101 years 39 years transmission and distribution facilities . . . . . . . . . 8516 7963 9 to 156 years 83 years services , meters and fire hydrants . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3250 3062 8 to 93 years 35 years general structures and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1227 1096 1 to 154 years 39 years waste treatment , pumping and disposal . . . . . . . . . 313 281 2 to 115 years 46 years waste collection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 473 399 5 to 109 years 56 years construction work in progress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 404 303 total utility plant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18099 16891 nonutility property . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 405 378 3 to 50 years 6 years total property , plant and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 18504 $ 17269 property , plant and equipment depreciation expense amounted to $ 405 , $ 392 , and $ 374 for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively and was included in depreciation and amortization expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations . the provision for depreciation expressed as a percentage of the aggregate average depreciable asset balances was 3.13% ( 3.13 % ) for the year ended december 31 , 2015 and 3.20% ( 3.20 % ) for years december 31 , 2014 and 2013 . note 5 : allowance for uncollectible accounts the following table summarizes the changes in the company 2019s allowances for uncollectible accounts for the years ended december 31: .

Table: 2015 2014 2013 balance as of january 1 $ -35 ( 35 ) $ -34 ( 34 ) $ -27 ( 27 ) amounts charged to expense -32 ( 32 ) -37 ( 37 ) -27 ( 27 ) amounts written off 38 43 24 recoveries of amounts written off -10 ( 10 ) -7 ( 7 ) -4 ( 4 ) balance as of december 31 $ -39 ( 39 ) $ -35 ( 35 ) $ -34 ( 34 )

.

Question: what was the change in accumulated depreciation from depreciation expenses from 2013 to december 31 , 2015
Answer: 1171
Calculation: add(add(405, 392), 374)
Explanation: the amount of accumulated depreciation from the years 2015-2013 was the the sum of the depreciation expense for each year .
worldwide distribution channels the following table presents the number of doors by geographic location , in which ralph lauren-branded products distributed by our wholesale segment were sold to consumers in our primary channels of distribution as of march 31 , 2012 : location number of .

Table: location number of doors the americas 6587 europe 4377 asia 83 total 11047

in addition , american living and chaps-branded products distributed by our wholesale segment were sold domestically through approximately 1800 doors as of march 31 , 2012 . we have three key wholesale customers that generate significant sales volume . for fiscal 2012 , these customers in the aggregate accounted for approximately 40% ( 40 % ) of total wholesale revenues , with macy 2019s , inc . representing approximately 20% ( 20 % ) of total wholesale revenues . our product brands are sold primarily through our own sales forces . our wholesale segment maintains its primary showrooms in new york city . in addition , we maintain regional showrooms in chicago , dallas , milan , paris , london , munich , madrid , stockholm and tokyo . shop-within-shops . as a critical element of our distribution to department stores , we and our licensing partners utilize shop-within-shops to enhance brand recognition , to permit more complete merchandising of our lines by the department stores and to differentiate the presentation of products . shop-within- shop fixed assets primarily include items such as customized freestanding fixtures , wall cases and components , decorative items and flooring . as of march 31 , 2012 , we had approximately 18000 shop-within-shops dedicated to our ralph lauren-branded wholesale products worldwide . the size of our shop-within-shops ranges from approximately 300 to 7400 square feet . we normally share in the cost of building-out these shop-within-shops with our wholesale customers . basic stock replenishment program . basic products such as knit shirts , chino pants , oxford cloth shirts , and selected accessories ( including footwear ) and home products can be ordered at any time through our basic stock replenishment programs . we generally ship these products within two-to-five days of order receipt . our retail segment as of march 31 , 2012 , our retail segment consisted of 379 stores worldwide , totaling approximately 2.9 million gross square feet , 474 concessions- based shop-within-shops and six e-commerce websites . the extension of our direct-to-consumer reach is a primary long-term strategic goal . ralph lauren retail stores our ralph lauren retail stores reinforce the luxury image and distinct sensibility of our brands and feature exclusive lines that are not sold in domestic department stores . we opened 10 new ralph lauren stores , acquired 3 previously licensed stores , and closed 16 ralph lauren stores in fiscal 2012 . our retail stores are primarily situated in major upscale street locations and upscale regional malls , generally in large urban markets. .

Question: what percentage of worldwide distribution channels doors as of march 31 , 2012 where in the americas?
Answer: 60%
Calculation: divide(6587, 11047)
lkq corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 5 . long-term obligations ( continued ) as part of the consideration for business acquisitions completed during 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , we issued promissory notes totaling approximately $ 1.7 million , $ 7.2 million and $ 6.4 million , respectively . the notes bear interest at annual rates of 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) to 6.0% ( 6.0 % ) , and interest is payable at maturity or in monthly installments . we also assumed certain liabilities in connection with a business acquisition during the second quarter of 2005 , including a promissory note with a remaining principle balance of approximately $ 0.2 million . the annual interest rate on the note , which was retired during 2006 , was note 6 . commitments and contingencies operating leases we are obligated under noncancelable operating leases for corporate office space , warehouse and distribution facilities , trucks and certain equipment . the future minimum lease commitments under these leases at december 31 , 2007 are as follows ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31: .

Table: 2008 $ 42335 2009 33249 2010 25149 2011 17425 2012 11750 thereafter 28581 future minimum lease payments $ 158489

rental expense for operating leases was approximately $ 27.4 million , $ 18.6 million and $ 12.2 million during the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . we guaranty the residual values of the majority of our truck and equipment operating leases . the residual values decline over the lease terms to a defined percentage of original cost . in the event the lessor does not realize the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be responsible for a portion of the shortfall . similarly , if the lessor realizes more than the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be paid the amount realized over the residual value . had we terminated all of our operating leases subject to these guaranties at december 31 , 2007 , the guarantied residual value would have totaled approximately $ 24.0 million . litigation and related contingencies on december 2 , 2005 , ford global technologies , llc ( 2018 2018ford 2019 2019 ) filed a complaint with the united states international trade commission ( 2018 2018usitc 2019 2019 ) against keystone and five other named respondents , including four taiwan-based manufacturers . on december 12 , 2005 , ford filed an amended complaint . both the complaint and the amended complaint contended that keystone and the other respondents infringed 14 design patents that ford alleges cover eight parts on the 2004-2005 .

Question: what was the percentage change in rental expense from 2006 to 2007?
Answer: 47%
Calculation: divide(subtract(27.4, 18.6), 18.6)
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our class a common stock on the new york stock exchange ( 201cnyse 201d ) for the years 2007 and 2006. .

Table: 2007 high low quarter ended march 31 $ 41.31 $ 36.63 quarter ended june 30 43.84 37.64 quarter ended september 30 45.45 36.34 quarter ended december 31 46.53 40.08 2006 high low quarter ended march 31 $ 32.68 $ 26.66 quarter ended june 30 35.75 27.35 quarter ended september 30 36.92 29.98 quarter ended december 31 38.74 35.21

on february 29 , 2008 , the closing price of our class a common stock was $ 38.44 per share as reported on the nyse . as of february 29 , 2008 , we had 395748826 outstanding shares of class a common stock and 528 registered holders . dividends we have never paid a dividend on any class of our common stock . we anticipate that we may retain future earnings , if any , to fund the development and growth of our business . the indentures governing our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 201c7.50% ( 201c7.50 % ) notes 201d ) and our 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 201c7.125% ( 201c7.125 % ) notes 201d ) may prohibit us from paying dividends to our stockholders unless we satisfy certain financial covenants . the loan agreement for our revolving credit facility and the indentures governing the terms of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes contain covenants that restrict our ability to pay dividends unless certain financial covenants are satisfied . in addition , while spectrasite and its subsidiaries are classified as unrestricted subsidiaries under the indentures for our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes , certain of spectrasite 2019s subsidiaries are subject to restrictions on the amount of cash that they can distribute to us under the loan agreement related to our securitization . for more information about the restrictions under the loan agreement for the revolving credit facility , our notes indentures and the loan agreement related to the securitization , see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources 2014factors affecting sources of liquidity 201d and note 3 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. .

Question: what is the growth rate in the price of shares from the highest value during the quarter ended december 31 , 2007 and the closing price on february 29 , 2008?
Answer: -17.4%
Calculation: divide(subtract(38.44, 46.53), 46.53)