bevaya/FinQA huggingface dataset:
jpmorgan chase & co./2012 annual report 167 the chart shows that for year ended december 31 , 2012 , the firm posted market risk related gains on 220 of the 261 days in this period , with gains on eight days exceeding $ 200 million . the chart includes year to date losses incurred in the synthetic credit portfolio . cib and credit portfolio posted market risk-related gains on 254 days in the period . the inset graph looks at those days on which the firm experienced losses and depicts the amount by which var exceeded the actual loss on each of those days . of the losses that were sustained on the 41 days of the 261 days in the trading period , the firm sustained losses that exceeded the var measure on three of those days . these losses in excess of the var all occurred in the second quarter of 2012 and were due to the adverse effect of market movements on risk positions in the synthetic credit portfolio held by cio . during the year ended december 31 , 2012 , cib and credit portfolio experienced seven loss days ; none of the losses on those days exceeded their respective var measures . other risk measures debit valuation adjustment sensitivity the following table provides information about the gross sensitivity of dva to a one-basis-point increase in jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spreads . this sensitivity represents the impact from a one-basis-point parallel shift in jpmorgan chase 2019s entire credit curve . however , the sensitivity at a single point in time multiplied by the change in credit spread at a single maturity point may not be representative of the actual dva gain or loss realized within a period . the actual results reflect the movement in credit spreads across various maturities , which typically do not move in a parallel fashion , and is the product of a constantly changing exposure profile , among other factors . debit valuation adjustment sensitivity ( in millions ) one basis-point increase in jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spread .

Table: ( in millions ) one basis-point increase injpmorgan chase 2019s credit spread december 31 2012 $ 34 december 31 2011 35

economic-value stress testing along with var , stress testing is important in measuring and controlling risk . while var reflects the risk of loss due to adverse changes in markets using recent historical market behavior as an indicator of losses , stress testing captures the firm 2019s exposure to unlikely but plausible events in abnormal markets . the firm runs weekly stress tests on market-related risks across the lines of business using multiple scenarios that assume significant changes in risk factors such as credit spreads , equity prices , interest rates , currency rates or commodity prices . the framework uses a grid-based approach , which calculates multiple magnitudes of stress for both market rallies and market sell-offs for .

Question: how often did the firm post gains exceeding $ 200 million in 2012?\\n
Answer: 3.1%
Calculation: divide(const_8, 261)
jpmorgan chase & co./2018 form 10-k 41 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co . ( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index . the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced equity benchmark in the united states of america ( 201cu.s . 201d ) , consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s . and is composed of leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts . the s&p financial index is an index of financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 . the firm is a component of all three industry indices . the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2013 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices . the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested . december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 .

Table: december 31 ( in dollars ) 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 jpmorgan chase $ 100.00 $ 109.88 $ 119.07 $ 160.23 $ 203.07 $ 189.57 kbw bank index 100.00 109.36 109.90 141.23 167.49 137.82 s&p financial index 100.00 115.18 113.38 139.17 169.98 147.82 s&p 500 index 100.00 113.68 115.24 129.02 157.17 150.27

december 31 , ( in dollars ) .

Question: did jpmorgan chase outperform the kbw bank index?
Answer: yes
Calculation: greater(189.57, 137.82)
visa inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) september 30 , 2008 ( in millions , except as noted ) were converted on a one-to-one basis from class eu ( series i , ii , iii ) common stock to class c ( series iii , ii , and iv ) common stock concurrent with the true-up . the results of the true-up are reflected in the table below . fractional shares resulting from the conversion of the shares of each individual stockholder have been rounded down . these fractional shares were paid in cash to stockholders as part of the initial redemption of class b common stock and class c common stock shortly following the ipo . outstanding regional classes and series of common stock issued in the reorganization converted classes and series of common stock issued in the true-up number of regional classes and series of common stock issued in the reorganization true-up conversion number of converted classes and series of common stock after the true-up class usa ( 1 ) class b ( 2 ) 426390481 0.93870 400251872 .

Table: outstanding regional classes and seriesof common stock issued inthe reorganization converted classes and series of common stock issued in the true-up number of regional classes and series of common stock issued in the reorganization true-up conversion ratio number of converted classes and series of common stock after the true-up class usa ( 1 ) class b ( 2 ) 426390481 0.93870 400251872 class eu ( series i ) class c ( series iii ) 62213201 1.00000 62213201 class eu ( series ii ) class c ( series ii ) 27904464 1.00000 27904464 class eu ( series iii ) class c ( series iv ) 549587 1.00000 549587 class canada class c ( series i ) 22034685 0.98007 21595528 class ap class c ( series i ) 119100481 1.19043 141780635 class lac class c ( series i ) 80137915 1.07110 85835549 class cemea class c ( series i ) 36749698 0.95101 34949123

( 1 ) the amount of the class usa common stock outstanding prior to the true-up is net of 131592008 shares held by wholly-owned subsidiaries of the company . ( 2 ) the amount of the class b common stock outstanding subsequent to the true-up is net of 123525418 shares held by wholly-owned subsidiaries of the company . also , the company issued 51844393 additional shares of class c ( series ii ) common stock at a price of $ 44 per share in exchange for a subscription receivable from visa europe . this issuance and subscription receivable were recorded as offsetting entries in temporary equity on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet at september 30 , 2008 . initial public offering in march 2008 , the company completed its ipo with the issuance of 446600000 shares of class a common stock at a net offering price of $ 42.77 ( the ipo price of $ 44.00 per share of class a common stock , less underwriting discounts and commissions of $ 1.23 per share ) . the company received net proceeds of $ 19.1 billion as a result of the ipo. .

Question: what is the difference in the number of class usa stock of pre and after true-up?
Answer: 26138609
Calculation: subtract(426390481, 400251872)
the graph below shows a five-year comparison of the cumulative shareholder return on the company's common stock with the cumulative total return of the s&p smallcap 600 index and the s&p 600 electrical equipment index , all of which are published indices . comparison of five-year cumulative total return from december 31 , 2002 to december 31 , 2007 assumes $ 100 invested with reinvestment of dividends period indexed returns .

Table: company/index baseperiod 12/31/02 baseperiod 12/31/03 baseperiod 12/31/04 baseperiod 12/31/05 baseperiod 12/31/06 12/31/07 a o smith corp 100.00 132.23 115.36 138.20 150.26 142.72 s&p smallcap 600 index 100.00 138.79 170.22 183.30 211.01 210.39 s&p 600 electrical equipment 100.00 126.12 152.18 169.07 228.83 253.33

12/31/02 12/31/03 12/31/04 12/31/05 12/31/06 12/31/07 smith ( a o ) corp s&p smallcap 600 index s&p 600 electrical equipment .

Question: what was the difference in cumulative total return for the five year period ending 12/31/07 between a o smith corp and the s&p smallcap 600 index?
Answer: -67.67%
Calculation: subtract(divide(subtract(142.72, const_100), const_100), divide(subtract(210.39, const_100), const_100))
management 2019s discussion and analysis net interest income 2013 versus 2012 . net interest income on the consolidated statements of earnings was $ 3.39 billion for 2013 , 13% ( 13 % ) lower than 2012 . the decrease compared with 2012 was primarily due to lower average yields on financial instruments owned , at fair value , partially offset by lower interest expense on financial instruments sold , but not yet purchased , at fair value and collateralized financings . 2012 versus 2011 . net interest income on the consolidated statements of earnings was $ 3.88 billion for 2012 , 25% ( 25 % ) lower than 2011 . the decrease compared with 2011 was primarily due to lower average yields on financial instruments owned , at fair value and collateralized agreements . see 201cstatistical disclosures 2014 distribution of assets , liabilities and shareholders 2019 equity 201d for further information about our sources of net interest income . operating expenses our operating expenses are primarily influenced by compensation , headcount and levels of business activity . compensation and benefits includes salaries , discretionary compensation , amortization of equity awards and other items such as benefits . discretionary compensation is significantly impacted by , among other factors , the level of net revenues , overall financial performance , prevailing labor markets , business mix , the structure of our share-based compensation programs and the external environment . the table below presents our operating expenses and total staff ( which includes employees , consultants and temporary staff ) . .

Table: $ in millions year ended december 2013 year ended december 2012 year ended december 2011 compensation and benefits $ 12613 $ 12944 $ 12223 brokerage clearing exchange anddistribution fees 2341 2208 2463 market development 541 509 640 communications and technology 776 782 828 depreciation and amortization 1322 1738 1865 occupancy 839 875 1030 professional fees 930 867 992 insurance reserves1 176 598 529 other expenses 2931 2435 2072 total non-compensation expenses 9856 10012 10419 total operating expenses $ 22469 $ 22956 $ 22642 total staff at period-end 32900 32400 33300

1 . related revenues are included in 201cmarket making 201d in the consolidated statements of earnings . goldman sachs 2013 annual report 45 .

Question: what is the percentage change in staff number in 2013?
Answer: 1.5%
Calculation: divide(subtract(32900, 32400), 32400)
table of contents company stock performance the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index as of the market close on september 30 , 2008 . data points on the graph are annual . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . fiscal year ending september 30 . copyright 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . copyright 2013 dow jones & co . all rights reserved . *$ 100 invested on 9/30/08 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 .

Table: september 30 2008 september 30 2009 september 30 2010 september 30 2011 september 30 2012 september 30 2013 apple inc . $ 100 $ 163 $ 250 $ 335 $ 589 $ 431 s&p 500 index $ 100 $ 93 $ 103 $ 104 $ 135 $ 161 s&p computer hardware index $ 100 $ 118 $ 140 $ 159 $ 255 $ 197 dow jones us technology supersector index $ 100 $ 111 $ 124 $ 128 $ 166 $ 175

.

Question: by how much did apple inc . outperform the s&p computer hardware index over the above mentioned 6 year period?
Answer: 270%
Calculation: subtract(divide(subtract(431, 100), 100), divide(subtract(197, 100), 100))
as of december 31 , 2006 , we also leased an office and laboratory facility in connecticut , additional office , distribution and storage facilities in san diego , and four foreign facilities located in japan , singapore , china and the netherlands under non-cancelable operating leases that expire at various times through july 2011 . these leases contain renewal options ranging from one to five years . as of december 31 , 2006 , our contractual obligations were ( in thousands ) : contractual obligation total less than 1 year 1 2013 3 years 1 2013 5 years more than 5 years .

Table: contractual obligation payments due by period total payments due by period less than 1 year payments due by period 1 2013 3 years payments due by period 1 2013 5 years payments due by period more than 5 years operating leases $ 37899 $ 5320 $ 10410 $ 9371 $ 12798 total $ 37899 $ 5320 $ 10410 $ 9371 $ 12798

the above table does not include orders for goods and services entered into in the normal course of business that are not enforceable or legally binding . item 7a . quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk . interest rate sensitivity our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to our investment portfolio . the fair market value of fixed rate securities may be adversely impacted by fluctuations in interest rates while income earned on floating rate securities may decline as a result of decreases in interest rates . under our current policies , we do not use interest rate derivative instruments to manage exposure to interest rate changes . we attempt to ensure the safety and preservation of our invested principal funds by limiting default risk , market risk and reinvestment risk . we mitigate default risk by investing in investment grade securities . we have historically maintained a relatively short average maturity for our investment portfolio , and we believe a hypothetical 100 basis point adverse move in interest rates along the entire interest rate yield curve would not materially affect the fair value of our interest sensitive financial instruments . foreign currency exchange risk although most of our revenue is realized in u.s . dollars , some portions of our revenue are realized in foreign currencies . as a result , our financial results could be affected by factors such as changes in foreign currency exchange rates or weak economic conditions in foreign markets . the functional currencies of our subsidiaries are their respective local currencies . accordingly , the accounts of these operations are translated from the local currency to the u.s . dollar using the current exchange rate in effect at the balance sheet date for the balance sheet accounts , and using the average exchange rate during the period for revenue and expense accounts . the effects of translation are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income as a separate component of stockholders 2019 equity. .

Question: what is the percent of the operating leases that are due in less than year to the total leases .
Answer: 14%
Calculation: divide(5320, 37899)
common stock from time to time through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions at prevailing prices as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements , and subject to stock price , business and market conditions and other factors . we have been funding and expect to continue to fund stock repurchases through a combination of cash on hand and cash generated by operations . in the future , we may also choose to fund our stock repurchase program under our revolving credit facility or future financing transactions . there were no repurchases of our series a and b common stock during the three months ended december 31 , 2013 . the company first announced its stock repurchase program on august 3 , 2010 . stock performance graph the following graph sets forth the cumulative total shareholder return on our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock as compared with the cumulative total return of the companies listed in the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and a peer group of companies comprised of cbs corporation class b common stock , scripps network interactive , inc. , time warner , inc. , twenty-first century fox , inc . class a common stock ( news corporation class a common stock prior to june 2013 ) , viacom , inc . class b common stock and the walt disney company . the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on december 31 , 2008 in each of our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the stock of our peer group companies , including reinvestment of dividends , for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2010 , 2011 , 2012 and 2013 . december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 .

Table: december 312008 december 312009 december 312010 december 312011 december 312012 december 312013 disca $ 100.00 $ 216.60 $ 294.49 $ 289.34 $ 448.31 $ 638.56 discb $ 100.00 $ 207.32 $ 287.71 $ 277.03 $ 416.52 $ 602.08 disck $ 100.00 $ 198.06 $ 274.01 $ 281.55 $ 436.89 $ 626.29 s&p 500 $ 100.00 $ 123.45 $ 139.23 $ 139.23 $ 157.90 $ 204.63 peer group $ 100.00 $ 151.63 $ 181.00 $ 208.91 $ 286.74 $ 454.87

equity compensation plan information information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans will be set forth in our definitive proxy statement for our 2014 annual meeting of stockholders under the caption 201csecurities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans , 201d which is incorporated herein by reference. .

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return on disca for the five year period ended december 21 , 2013?
Answer: 538.56%
Calculation: divide(subtract(638.56, const_100), const_100)
entergy louisiana , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis setting any of entergy louisiana's rates . therefore , to the extent entergy louisiana's use of the proceeds would ordinarily have reduced its rate base , no change in rate base shall be reflected for ratemaking purposes . the sec approval for additional return of equity capital is now expired . entergy louisiana's receivables from or ( payables to ) the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years: .

Table: 2004 2003 2002 2001 ( in thousands ) ( in thousands ) ( in thousands ) ( in thousands ) $ 40549 ( $ 41317 ) $ 18854 $ 3812

money pool activity used $ 81.9 million of entergy louisiana's operating cash flow in 2004 , provided $ 60.2 million in 2003 , and used $ 15.0 million in 2002 . see note 4 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements for a description of the money pool . investing activities the decrease of $ 25.1 million in net cash used by investing activities in 2004 was primarily due to decreased spending on customer service projects , partially offset by increases in spending on transmission projects and fossil plant projects . the increase of $ 56.0 million in net cash used by investing activities in 2003 was primarily due to increased spending on customer service , transmission , and nuclear projects . financing activities the decrease of $ 404.4 million in net cash used by financing activities in 2004 was primarily due to : 2022 the net issuance of $ 98.0 million of long-term debt in 2004 compared to the retirement of $ 261.0 million in 2022 a principal payment of $ 14.8 million in 2004 for the waterford lease obligation compared to a principal payment of $ 35.4 million in 2003 ; and 2022 a decrease of $ 29.0 million in common stock dividends paid . the decrease of $ 105.5 million in net cash used by financing activities in 2003 was primarily due to : 2022 a decrease of $ 125.9 million in common stock dividends paid ; and 2022 the repurchase of $ 120 million of common stock from entergy corporation in 2002 . the decrease in net cash used in 2003 was partially offset by the following : 2022 the retirement in 2003 of $ 150 million of 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) series first mortgage bonds compared to the net retirement of $ 134.6 million of first mortgage bonds in 2002 ; and 2022 principal payments of $ 35.4 million in 2003 for the waterford 3 lease obligation compared to principal payments of $ 15.9 million in 2002 . see note 5 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements for details of long-term debt . uses of capital entergy louisiana requires capital resources for : 2022 construction and other capital investments ; 2022 debt and preferred stock maturities ; 2022 working capital purposes , including the financing of fuel and purchased power costs ; and 2022 dividend and interest payments. .

Question: what is the percent change in receivables from or ( payables to ) the money pool from 2001 to 2002?
Answer: 395%
Calculation: divide(subtract(18854, 3812), 3812)