bevaya/FinQA huggingface dataset:
page 77 of 100 ball corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 18 . financial instruments and risk management ( continued ) the following table provides the effects of derivative instruments in the consolidated statement of earnings and on accumulated other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) for the year ended december 31: .

Table: ( $ in millions ) 2010 cash flow hedge 2013 reclassified amount from other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) 2013 gain ( loss ) 2010 gain ( loss ) on derivatives not designated as hedge instruments 2010 cash flow hedge 2013 reclassified amount from other comprehensive earnings ( loss ) 2013 gain ( loss ) gain ( loss ) on derivatives not designated as hedge instruments commodity contracts ( a ) $ -6.4 ( 6.4 ) $ -0.3 ( 0.3 ) $ -96.4 ( 96.4 ) $ -5.1 ( 5.1 ) interest rate contracts ( b ) -4.9 ( 4.9 ) 2212 -8.1 ( 8.1 ) 2212 inflation option contracts ( c ) 2013 -0.9 ( 0.9 ) 2013 -0.1 ( 0.1 ) foreign exchange contracts ( d ) -2.3 ( 2.3 ) 0.7 0.7 6.5 equity contracts ( e ) 2013 2013 2013 3.2 total $ -13.6 ( 13.6 ) $ -0.5 ( 0.5 ) $ -103.8 ( 103.8 ) $ 4.5

( a ) gains and losses on commodity contracts are recorded in sales and cost of sales in the statement of earnings . virtually all these expenses were passed through to our customers , resulting in no significant impact to earnings . ( b ) losses on interest contracts are recorded in interest expense in the statement of earnings . ( c ) gains and losses on inflation options are recorded in cost of sales in the statement of earnings . ( d ) gains and losses on foreign currency contracts to hedge the sales of products are recorded in cost of sales . gains and losses on foreign currency hedges used for translation between segments are reflected in selling , general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statement of earnings . ( e ) gains and losses on equity put option contracts are recorded in selling , general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statement of earnings. .

Question: for 2010 , foreign exchange contracts were what portion of the reclassification to ordinary income?
Answer: 17%
Calculation: divide(2.3, 13.6)
table of contents celanese purchases of its equity securities information regarding repurchases of our common stock during the three months ended december 31 , 2017 is as follows : period number of shares purchased ( 1 ) average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program approximate dollar value of shares remaining that may be purchased under the program ( 2 ) .

Table: period totalnumberof sharespurchased ( 1 ) averageprice paidper share total numberof sharespurchased aspart of publiclyannounced program approximatedollarvalue of sharesremaining thatmay bepurchased underthe program ( 2 ) october 1 - 31 2017 10676 $ 104.10 2014 $ 1531000000 november 1 - 30 2017 924 $ 104.02 2014 $ 1531000000 december 1 - 31 2017 38605 $ 106.36 2014 $ 1531000000 total 50205 2014

___________________________ ( 1 ) represents shares withheld from employees to cover their statutory minimum withholding requirements for personal income taxes related to the vesting of restricted stock units . ( 2 ) our board of directors has authorized the aggregate repurchase of $ 3.9 billion of our common stock since february 2008 , including an increase of $ 1.5 billion on july 17 , 2017 . see note 17 - stockholders' equity in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for further information. .

Question: what is the total authorized the aggregate repurchase of common stock since february 2008 including the additional amount authorized in 2017 in billions
Answer: 5.3
Calculation: add(3.9, 1.5)
Explanation: the total amount is the sum of the amounts
company stock performance the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 composite index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology index . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 composite index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology index on september 30 , 2006 . data points on the graph are annual . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among apple inc. , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index and the dow jones us technology index sep-10sep-09sep-08sep-07sep-06 sep-11 apple inc . s&p 500 s&p computer hardware dow jones us technology *$ 100 invested on 9/30/06 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending september 30 . copyright a9 2011 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . copyright a9 2011 dow jones & co . all rights reserved . september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 .

Table: september 30 2006 september 30 2007 september 30 2008 september 30 2009 september 30 2010 september 30 2011 apple inc . $ 100 $ 199 $ 148 $ 241 $ 369 $ 495 s&p 500 $ 100 $ 116 $ 91 $ 85 $ 93 $ 94 s&p computer hardware $ 100 $ 148 $ 124 $ 147 $ 174 $ 197 dow jones us technology $ 100 $ 123 $ 94 $ 104 $ 117 $ 120

.

Question: did apple achieve a greater return in the year ended sept . 30 2008 than the s&p 500?
Answer: yes
Calculation: greater(148, 91)
the company granted 1020 performance shares . the vesting of these shares is contingent on meeting stated goals over a performance period . beginning with restricted stock grants in september 2010 , dividends are accrued on restricted class a common stock and restricted stock units and are paid once the restricted stock vests . the following table summarizes restricted stock and performance shares activity for 2010 : number of shares weighted average grant date fair value .

Table: number of shares weighted average grant date fair value outstanding at december 31 2009 116677 $ 280 granted 134245 275 vested -34630 ( 34630 ) 257 cancelled -19830 ( 19830 ) 260 outstanding at december 31 2010 196462 283

the total fair value of restricted stock that vested during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , was $ 10.3 million , $ 6.2 million and $ 2.5 million , respectively . eligible employees may acquire shares of cme group 2019s class a common stock using after-tax payroll deductions made during consecutive offering periods of approximately six months in duration . shares are purchased at the end of each offering period at a price of 90% ( 90 % ) of the closing price of the class a common stock as reported on the nasdaq . compensation expense is recognized on the dates of purchase for the discount from the closing price . in 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , a total of 4371 , 4402 and 5600 shares , respectively , of class a common stock were issued to participating employees . these shares are subject to a six-month holding period . annual expense of $ 0.1 million for the purchase discount was recognized in 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . non-executive directors receive an annual award of class a common stock with a value equal to $ 75000 . non-executive directors may also elect to receive some or all of the cash portion of their annual stipend , up to $ 25000 , in shares of stock based on the closing price at the date of distribution . as a result , 7470 , 11674 and 5509 shares of class a common stock were issued to non-executive directors during 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . these shares are not subject to any vesting restrictions . expense of $ 2.4 million , $ 2.5 million and $ 2.4 million related to these stock-based payments was recognized for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively. .

Question: based on the summary of the restricted stock and performance shares activity for 2010 what was percentage change in the number of shares outstanding
Answer: 68.4%
Calculation: divide(subtract(196462, 116677), 116677)
s c h e d u l e i v ( continued ) ace limited and subsidiaries s u p p l e m e n t a l i n f o r m a t i o n c o n c e r n i n g r e i n s u r a n c e premiums earned for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 , and 2006 ( in millions of u.s . dollars ) direct amount ceded to companies assumed from other companies net amount percentage of amount assumed to .

Table: for the years ended december 31 2008 2007 and 2006 ( in millions of u.s . dollars ) direct amount ceded to other companies assumed from other companies net amount percentage of amount assumed to net 2008 $ 16087 $ 6144 $ 3260 $ 13203 25% ( 25 % ) 2007 $ 14673 $ 5834 $ 3458 $ 12297 28% ( 28 % ) 2006 $ 13562 $ 5198 $ 3461 $ 11825 29% ( 29 % )

.

Question: what is the growth rate of net amount from 2007 to 2008?
Answer: 7.4%
Calculation: divide(subtract(13203, 12297), 12297)
entergy new orleans , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis entergy new orleans' receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years: .

Table: 2004 2003 2002 2001 ( in thousands ) ( in thousands ) ( in thousands ) ( in thousands ) $ 1413 $ 1783 $ 3500 $ 9208

money pool activity provided $ 0.4 million of entergy new orleans' operating cash flow in 2004 , provided $ 1.7 million in 2003 , and provided $ 5.7 million in 2002 . see note 4 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements for a description of the money pool . investing activities net cash used in investing activities decreased $ 15.5 million in 2004 primarily due to capital expenditures related to a turbine inspection project at a fossil plant in 2003 and decreased customer service spending . net cash used in investing activities increased $ 23.2 million in 2003 compared to 2002 primarily due to the maturity of $ 14.9 million of other temporary investments in 2002 and increased construction expenditures due to increased customer service spending . financing activities net cash used in financing activities increased $ 7.0 million in 2004 primarily due to the costs and expenses related to refinancing $ 75 million of long-term debt in 2004 and an increase of $ 2.2 million in common stock dividends paid . net cash used in financing activities increased $ 1.5 million in 2003 primarily due to additional common stock dividends paid of $ 2.2 million . in july 2003 , entergy new orleans issued $ 30 million of 3.875% ( 3.875 % ) series first mortgage bonds due august 2008 and $ 70 million of 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) series first mortgage bonds due august 2013 . the proceeds from these issuances were used to redeem , prior to maturity , $ 30 million of 7% ( 7 % ) series first mortgage bonds due july 2008 , $ 40 million of 8% ( 8 % ) series bonds due march 2006 , and $ 30 million of 6.65% ( 6.65 % ) series first mortgage bonds due march 2004 . the issuances and redemptions are not shown on the cash flow statement because the proceeds from the issuances were placed in a trust for use in the redemptions and never held as cash by entergy new orleans . see note 5 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements for details on long- term debt . uses of capital entergy new orleans requires capital resources for : 2022 construction and other capital investments ; 2022 debt and preferred stock maturities ; 2022 working capital purposes , including the financing of fuel and purchased power costs ; and 2022 dividend and interest payments. .

Question: what the provisions to operating cash flow from money pool as a percentage of receivables from the money pool in 2003?
Answer: 95.4%
Calculation: divide(1.7, divide(1783, const_1000))
the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 company for an aggregate proceeds of approximately $ 234 million . the company recognized a gain on disposal of $ 6 million , net of tax , during the year ended december 31 , 2010 . ras laffan was previously reported in the asia generation segment . 23 . acquisitions and dispositions acquisitions dpl 2014on november 28 , 2011 , aes completed its acquisition of 100% ( 100 % ) of the common stock of dpl for approximately $ 3.5 billion , pursuant to the terms and conditions of a definitive agreement ( the 201cmerger agreement 201d ) dated april 19 , 2011 . dpl serves over 500000 customers , primarily west central ohio , through its operating subsidiaries dp&l and dpl energy resources ( 201cdpler 201d ) . additionally , dpl operates over 3800 mw of power generation facilities and provides competitive retail energy services to residential , commercial , industrial and governmental customers . the acquisition strengthens the company 2019s u.s . utility operations by expanding in the midwest and pjm , a regional transmission organization serving several eastern states as part of the eastern interconnection . the company expects to benefit from the regional scale provided by indianapolis power & light company , its nearby integrated utility business in indiana . aes funded the aggregate purchase consideration through a combination of the following : 2022 the proceeds from a $ 1.05 billion term loan obtained in may 2011 ; 2022 the proceeds from a private offering of $ 1.0 billion notes in june 2011 ; 2022 temporary borrowings of $ 251 million under its revolving credit facility ; and 2022 the proceeds from private offerings of $ 450 million aggregate principal amount of 6.50% ( 6.50 % ) senior notes due 2016 and $ 800 million aggregate principal amount of 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) senior notes due 2021 ( collectively , the 201cnotes 201d ) in october 2011 by dolphin subsidiary ii , inc . ( 201cdolphin ii 201d ) , a wholly-owned special purpose indirect subsidiary of aes , which was merged into dpl upon the completion of acquisition . the fair value of the consideration paid for dpl was as follows ( in millions ) : .

Table: agreed enterprise value $ 4719 less : fair value of assumed long-term debt outstanding net -1255 ( 1255 ) cash consideration paid to dpl 2019s common stockholders 3464 add : cash paid for outstanding stock-based awards 19 total cash consideration paid $ 3483

.

Question: how much of the dpl purchase price was funded by existing credit facilities as opposed to new borrowing?
Answer: 7.2%
Calculation: divide(251, multiply(3.5, const_1000))
3 . discontinued operations during the second quarter of 2012 , the board of directors authorized the sale of our homecare business , which had previously been reported as part of the merchant gases operating segment . this business has been accounted for as a discontinued operation . in the third quarter of 2012 , we sold the majority of our homecare business to the linde group for sale proceeds of 20ac590 million ( $ 777 ) and recognized a gain of $ 207.4 ( $ 150.3 after-tax , or $ .70 per share ) . the sale proceeds included 20ac110 million ( $ 144 ) that was contingent on the outcome of certain retender arrangements . these proceeds were reflected in payables and accrued liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet as of 30 september 2013 . based on the outcome of the retenders , we were contractually required to return proceeds to the linde group . in the fourth quarter of 2014 , we made a payment to settle this liability and recognized a gain of $ 1.5 . during the third quarter of 2012 , an impairment charge of $ 33.5 ( $ 29.5 after-tax , or $ .14 per share ) was recorded to write down the remaining business , which was primarily in the united kingdom and ireland , to its estimated net realizable value . in the fourth quarter of 2013 , an additional charge of $ 18.7 ( $ 13.6 after-tax , or $ .06 per share ) was recorded to update our estimate of the net realizable value . in the first quarter of 2014 , we sold the remaining portion of the homecare business for a36.1 million ( $ 9.8 ) and recorded a gain on sale of $ 2.4 . we entered into an operations guarantee related to the obligations under certain homecare contracts assigned in connection with the transaction . refer to note 16 , commitments and contingencies , for additional information . the results of discontinued operations are summarized below: .

Table: 2014 2013 2012 sales $ 8.5 $ 52.3 $ 258.0 income before taxes $ .7 $ 3.8 $ 68.1 income tax provision 2014 .2 20.8 income from operations of discontinued operations .7 3.6 47.3 gain ( loss ) on sale of business and impairment/write-down net of tax 3.9 -13.6 ( 13.6 ) 120.8 income ( loss ) from discontinued operations net of tax $ 4.6 $ -10.0 ( 10.0 ) $ 168.1

the assets and liabilities classified as discontinued operations for the homecare business at 30 september 2013 consisted of $ 2.5 in trade receivables , net , and $ 2.4 in payables and accrued liabilities . as of 30 september 2014 , no assets or liabilities were classified as discontinued operations. .

Question: considering the year 2014 , what is the percentage of income from operations of discontinued operations concerning income from discontinued operations net of tax?
Answer: 15.21%
Calculation: divide(.7, 4.6)
Explanation: it is the value of the income from operations of discontinued operations divided by the total income from discontinued operations net of tax's , then turned into a percentage .
22 2016 annual report performance graph the following chart presents a comparison for the five-year period ended june 30 , 2016 , of the market performance of the company 2019s common stock with the s&p 500 index and an index of peer companies selected by the company : comparison of 5 year cumulative total return among jack henry & associates , inc. , the s&p 500 index , and a peer group the following information depicts a line graph with the following values: .

Table: 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 jkhy 100.00 116.62 161.33 206.53 228.24 312.11 peer group 100.00 107.65 126.89 174.28 219.46 251.24 s&p 500 100.00 105.45 127.17 158.46 170.22 177.02

this comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on june 30 , 2011 , and assumes reinvestments of dividends . total returns are calculated according to market capitalization of peer group members at the beginning of each period . peer companies selected are in the business of providing specialized computer software , hardware and related services to financial institutions and other businesses . companies in the peer group are aci worldwide , inc. , bottomline technology , inc. , broadridge financial solutions , cardtronics , inc. , convergys corp. , corelogic , inc. , dst systems , inc. , euronet worldwide , inc. , fair isaac corp. , fidelity national information services , inc. , fiserv , inc. , global payments , inc. , moneygram international , inc. , ss&c technologies holdings , inc. , total systems services , inc. , tyler technologies , inc. , verifone systems , inc. , and wex , inc. . heartland payment systems , inc . was removed from the peer group as it merged with global payments , inc . in april 2016. .

Question: what was the percentage performance growth in the 5 year cumulative total return of peer group from 2014 to 2016
Answer: 25.9%
Calculation: divide(subtract(219.46, 174.28), 174.28)
performance graph this graph compares the return on lilly stock with that of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and our peer group for the years 2014 through 2018 . the graph assumes that , on december 31 , 2013 , a person invested $ 100 each in lilly stock , the s&p 500 stock index , and the peer groups' common stock . the graph measures total shareholder return , which takes into account both stock price and dividends . it assumes that dividends paid by a company are reinvested in that company 2019s stock . value of $ 100 invested on last business day of 2013 comparison of five-year cumulative total return among lilly , s&p 500 stock index , peer group ( 1 ) .

Table: lilly peer group s&p 500 dec-13 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 dec-14 $ 139.75 $ 114.39 $ 113.69 dec-15 $ 175.21 $ 116.56 $ 115.26 dec-16 $ 157.03 $ 112.80 $ 129.05 dec-17 $ 185.04 $ 128.90 $ 157.22 dec-18 $ 259.88 $ 136.56 $ 150.33

( 1 ) we constructed the peer group as the industry index for this graph . it comprises the companies in the pharmaceutical and biotech industries that we used to benchmark the compensation of our executive officers for 2018 : abbvie inc. ; amgen inc. ; astrazeneca plc ; baxter international inc. ; biogen idec inc. ; bristol-myers squibb company ; celgene corporation ; gilead sciences inc. ; glaxosmithkline plc ; johnson & johnson ; medtronic plc ; merck & co. , inc. ; novartis ag. ; pfizer inc. ; roche holdings ag ; sanofi ; and shire plc. .

Question: what was the difference in percentage return for lilly compared to the s&p 500 for the five years ended dec-18?
Calculation: subtract(divide(subtract(259.88, const_100), const_100), divide(subtract(150.33, const_100), const_100))
company stock performance the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 composite index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology index . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 composite index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology index on september 30 , 2006 . data points on the graph are annual . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among apple inc. , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index and the dow jones us technology index sep-10sep-09sep-08sep-07sep-06 sep-11 apple inc . s&p 500 s&p computer hardware dow jones us technology *$ 100 invested on 9/30/06 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending september 30 . copyright a9 2011 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . copyright a9 2011 dow jones & co . all rights reserved . september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 .

Table: september 30 2006 september 30 2007 september 30 2008 september 30 2009 september 30 2010 september 30 2011 apple inc . $ 100 $ 199 $ 148 $ 241 $ 369 $ 495 s&p 500 $ 100 $ 116 $ 91 $ 85 $ 93 $ 94 s&p computer hardware $ 100 $ 148 $ 124 $ 147 $ 174 $ 197 dow jones us technology $ 100 $ 123 $ 94 $ 104 $ 117 $ 120

.

Question: what was the cumulative percentage return for the four years ended september 30 , 2010 for apple inc.?
Answer: 269%
Calculation: divide(subtract(369, 100), 100)