bevaya/FinQA huggingface dataset:
entergy arkansas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 92.9 million primarily due to higher net revenue and lower other operation and maintenance expenses , partially offset by a higher effective income tax rate and higher depreciation and amortization expenses . 2015 compared to 2014 net income decreased $ 47.1 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses , partially offset by higher net revenue . net revenue 2016 compared to 2015 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 . amount ( in millions ) .

Table: amount ( in millions ) 2015 net revenue $ 1362.2 retail electric price 161.5 other -3.2 ( 3.2 ) 2016 net revenue $ 1520.5

the retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in base rates , as approved by the apsc . the new base rates were effective february 24 , 2016 and began billing with the first billing cycle of april 2016 . the increase includes an interim base rate adjustment surcharge , effective with the first billing cycle of april 2016 , to recover the incremental revenue requirement for the period february 24 , 2016 through march 31 , 2016 . a significant portion of the increase is related to the purchase of power block 2 of the union power station . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate case . see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the union power station purchase. .

Question: what would 2016 net revenue have been if it was impacted by the same higher other operation and maintenance expenses that impacted the prior year ( in millions ) ?
Answer: 1473.4
Calculation: subtract(1520.5, 47.1)
15 . leases in january 1996 , the company entered into a lease agreement with an unrelated third party for a new corporate office facility , which the company occupied in february 1997 . in may 2004 , the company entered into the first amendment to this lease agreement , effective january 1 , 2004 . the lease was extended from an original period of 10 years , with an option for five additional years , to a period of 18 years from the inception date , with an option for five additional years . the company incurred lease rental expense related to this facility of $ 1.3 million in 2008 , 2007 and 2006 . the future minimum lease payments are $ 1.4 million per annum from january 1 , 2009 to december 31 , 2014 . the future minimum lease payments from january 1 , 2015 through december 31 , 2019 will be determined based on prevailing market rental rates at the time of the extension , if elected . the amended lease also provided for the lessor to reimburse the company for up to $ 550000 in building refurbishments completed through march 31 , 2006 . these amounts have been recorded as a reduction of lease expense over the remaining term of the lease . the company has also entered into various noncancellable operating leases for equipment and office space . office space lease expense totaled $ 9.3 million , $ 6.3 million and $ 4.7 million for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . future minimum lease payments under noncancellable operating leases for office space in effect at december 31 , 2008 are $ 8.8 million in 2009 , $ 6.6 million in 2010 , $ 3.0 million in 2011 , $ 1.8 million in 2012 and $ 1.1 million in 2013 . 16 . royalty agreements the company has entered into various renewable , nonexclusive license agreements under which the company has been granted access to the licensor 2019s technology and the right to sell the technology in the company 2019s product line . royalties are payable to developers of the software at various rates and amounts , which generally are based upon unit sales or revenue . royalty fees are reported in cost of goods sold and were $ 6.3 million , $ 5.2 million and $ 3.9 million for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 and 2006 , respectively . 17 . geographic information revenue to external customers is attributed to individual countries based upon the location of the customer . revenue by geographic area is as follows: .

Table: ( in thousands ) year ended december 31 , 2008 year ended december 31 , 2007 year ended december 31 , 2006 united states $ 151688 $ 131777 $ 94282 germany 68390 50973 34567 japan 66960 50896 35391 canada 8033 4809 4255 other european 127246 108971 70184 other international 56022 37914 24961 total revenue $ 478339 $ 385340 $ 263640

.

Question: what was the average future minimum lease payments under noncancellable operating leases for office space from 2009 to 2013 in millions .
Answer: 5.325
Calculation: divide(add(add(add(add(8.8, 6.6), 3.0), 1.8), 1.1), const_4)
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2012 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average and our class b common stock. .

Table: 12/31/2012 12/31/2013 12/31/2014 12/31/2015 12/31/2016 12/31/2017 united parcel service inc . $ 100.00 $ 146.54 $ 159.23 $ 148.89 $ 182.70 $ 195.75 standard & poor 2019s 500 index $ 100.00 $ 132.38 $ 150.49 $ 152.55 $ 170.79 $ 208.06 dow jones transportation average $ 100.00 $ 141.38 $ 176.83 $ 147.19 $ 179.37 $ 213.49

.

Question: what is the total cumulative percentage return on investment on class b common stock for the five years ended 122/31/2017?
Answer: 95.75%
Calculation: divide(subtract(195.75, 100.00), 100.00)
table of contents company stock performance the following graph shows a comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index and the s&p information technology index for the five years ended september 27 , 2014 . the company has added the s&p information technology index to the graph to capture the stock performance of companies whose products and services relate to those of the company . the s&p information technology index replaces the s&p computer hardware index , which is no longer tracked by s&p . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index and the s&p information technology index as of the market close on september 25 , 2009 . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . copyright a9 2014 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . copyright a9 2014 dow jones & co . all rights reserved . apple inc . | 2014 form 10-k | 23 * $ 100 invested on 9/25/09 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . data points are the last day of each fiscal year for the company 2019s common stock and september 30th for indexes . september september september september september september .

Table: september 2009 september 2010 september 2011 september 2012 september 2013 september 2014 apple inc . $ 100 $ 160 $ 222 $ 367 $ 272 $ 407 s&p 500 index $ 100 $ 110 $ 111 $ 145 $ 173 $ 207 dow jones u.s . technology supersector index $ 100 $ 112 $ 115 $ 150 $ 158 $ 205 s&p information technology index $ 100 $ 111 $ 115 $ 152 $ 163 $ 210

.

Question: what was the difference in percentage of cumulative total shareholder return for the five year period ended september 2014 between apple inc . and the s&p 500 index?
Answer: 200%
Calculation: subtract(divide(subtract(407, 100), 100), divide(subtract(207, 100), 100))
sales of unregistered securities not applicable . repurchases of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of our equity securities during the period from october 1 , 2017 to december 31 , 2017 . total number of shares ( or units ) purchased 1 average price paid per share ( or unit ) 2 total number of shares ( or units ) purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs 3 maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs 3 .

Table: total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased1 average price paidper share ( or unit ) 2 total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs3 maximum number ( orapproximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchasedunder the plans orprograms3 october 1 - 31 1231868 $ 20.74 1230394 $ 214001430 november 1 - 30 1723139 $ 18.89 1722246 $ 181474975 december 1 - 31 1295639 $ 20.25 1285000 $ 155459545 total 4250646 $ 19.84 4237640

1 included shares of our common stock , par value $ 0.10 per share , withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock-based compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares ( the 201cwithheld shares 201d ) . we repurchased 1474 withheld shares in october 2017 , 893 withheld shares in november 2017 and 10639 withheld shares in december 2017 , for a total of 13006 withheld shares during the three-month period . 2 the average price per share for each of the months in the fiscal quarter and for the three-month period was calculated by dividing the sum of the applicable period of the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations and the aggregate amount we paid for shares acquired under our share repurchase program , described in note 5 to the consolidated financial statements , by the sum of the number of withheld shares and the number of shares acquired in our share repurchase program . 3 in february 2017 , the board authorized a share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock ( the 201c2017 share repurchase program 201d ) . on february 14 , 2018 , we announced that our board had approved a new share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock . the new authorization is in addition to any amounts remaining for repurchase under the 2017 share repurchase program . there is no expiration date associated with the share repurchase programs. .

Question: what is the monthly average of withheld shares from october to december 2017?
Answer: 4335.3
Calculation: divide(add(add(1474, 893), 10639), const_3)
leased real property in september 2002 , we completed a sale/leaseback transaction for our 200000 square foot headquarters and manufacturing facility located in bedford , massachusetts and our 62500 square foot lorad manufacturing facility in danbury , connecticut . the lease for these facilities , including the associated land , has a term of 20 years , with four-five year renewal options . we sublease approximately 10000 square feet of the bedford facility to a subtenant , cmp media , under a lease which expires in may 2006 . we also sublease approximately 11000 square feet of the bedford facility to a subtenant , genesys conferencing , under a lease which expires in february we lease a 60000 square feet of office and manufacturing space in danbury , connecticut near our lorad manufacturing facility . this lease expires in december 2012 . we also lease a sales and service office in belgium . item 3 . legal proceedings . in march 2005 , we were served with a complaint filed on november 12 , 2004 by oleg sokolov with the united states district court for the district of connecticut alleging that our htc 2122 grid infringes u.s . patent number 5970118 . the plaintiff is seeking to preliminarily and permanently enjoin us from infringing the patent , as well as damages resulting from the alleged infringement , treble damages and reasonable attorney fees , and such other and further relief as may be available . on april 25 , 2005 , we filed an answer and counterclaims in response to the complaint in which we denied the plaintiff 2019s allegations and , among other things , sought declaratory relief with respect to the patent claims and damages , as well as other relief . on october 28 , 1998 , the plaintiff had previously sued lorad , asserting , among other things , that lorad had misappropriated the plaintiff 2019s trade secrets relating to the htc grid . this previous case was dismissed on august 28 , 2000 . the dismissal was affirmed by the appellate court of the state of connecticut , and the united states supreme court refused to grant certiorari . we do not believe that we infringe any valid or enforceable patents of the plaintiff . however , while we intend to vigorously defend our interests , ongoing litigation can be costly and time consuming , and we cannot guarantee that we will prevail . item 4 . submission of matters to a vote of security holders . at a special meeting of stockholders held november 15 , 2005 , our stockholders approved a proposal to amend our certificate of incorporation to increase the number of shares of common stock the company has authority to issue from 30 million to 90 million . the voting results for the proposal , not adjusted for the effect of the stock split , were as follows: .

Table: for against abstained broker non-votes 17695228 963202 155213 0

as a result of the amendment , the previously announced two-for-one stock split to be effected as a stock dividend , was paid on november 30 , 2005 to stockholders of record on november 16 , 2005. .

Question: what portion of the votes support the proposal?
Answer: 94.1%
Calculation: divide(17695228, add(table_sum(17695228, 963202), 155213))
6feb201418202649 performance graph the table below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock with the cumulative total return of ( i ) the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 2018 2018s&p 500 index 2019 2019 ) , ( ii ) the standard & poor 2019s industrials index ( 2018 2018s&p industrials index 2019 2019 ) and ( iii ) the standard & poor 2019s consumer durables & apparel index ( 2018 2018s&p consumer durables & apparel index 2019 2019 ) , from december 31 , 2008 through december 31 , 2013 , when the closing price of our common stock was $ 22.77 . the graph assumes investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2008 in our common stock and in each of the three indices and the reinvestment of dividends . $ 350.00 $ 300.00 $ 250.00 $ 200.00 $ 150.00 $ 100.00 $ 50.00 performance graph .

Table: 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 masco $ 128.21 $ 120.32 $ 102.45 $ 165.80 $ 229.59 s&p 500 index $ 125.92 $ 144.58 $ 147.60 $ 171.04 $ 225.85 s&p industrials index $ 120.19 $ 151.89 $ 150.97 $ 173.87 $ 243.73 s&p consumer durables & apparel index $ 136.29 $ 177.91 $ 191.64 $ 232.84 $ 316.28

in july 2007 , our board of directors authorized the purchase of up to 50 million shares of our common stock in open-market transactions or otherwise . at december 31 , 2013 , we had remaining authorization to repurchase up to 22.6 million shares . during the first quarter of 2013 , we repurchased and retired 1.7 million shares of our common stock , for cash aggregating $ 35 million to offset the dilutive impact of the 2013 grant of 1.7 million shares of long-term stock awards . we have not purchased any shares since march 2013. .

Question: what was the percent of the increase in the performance of s&p 500 index from 2009 to 2010
Answer: 14.82%
Calculation: divide(divide(144.58, 125.92), 125.92)
Explanation: the performance of s&p 500 index increased by 14.92% from 2009 to 2010
2006 plan prior to december 5 , 2008 became fully vested and nonforfeitable upon the closing of the acquisition . awards may be granted under the 2006 plan , as amended and restated , after december 5 , 2008 only to employees and consultants of allied waste industries , inc . and its subsidiaries who were not employed by republic services , inc . prior to such date . at december 31 , 2010 , there were approximately 15.3 million shares of common stock reserved for future grants under the 2006 plan . stock options we use a binomial option-pricing model to value our stock option grants . we recognize compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the award , or to the employee 2019s retirement eligible date , if earlier . expected volatility is based on the weighted average of the most recent one-year volatility and a historical rolling average volatility of our stock over the expected life of the option . the risk-free interest rate is based on federal reserve rates in effect for bonds with maturity dates equal to the expected term of the option . we use historical data to estimate future option exercises , forfeitures and expected life of the options . when appropriate , separate groups of employees that have similar historical exercise behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes . the weighted-average estimated fair values of stock options granted during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 were $ 5.28 , $ 3.79 and $ 4.36 per option , respectively , which were calculated using the following weighted-average assumptions: .

Table: 2010 2009 2008 expected volatility 28.6% ( 28.6 % ) 28.7% ( 28.7 % ) 27.3% ( 27.3 % ) risk-free interest rate 2.4% ( 2.4 % ) 1.4% ( 1.4 % ) 1.7% ( 1.7 % ) dividend yield 2.9% ( 2.9 % ) 3.1% ( 3.1 % ) 2.9% ( 2.9 % ) expected life ( in years ) 4.3 4.2 4.2 contractual life ( in years ) 7 7 7 expected forfeiture rate 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) 3.0% ( 3.0 % )

republic services , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements , continued .

Question: what was the percentage growth in the weighted-average estimated fair values of stock options granted from 2009 to 2010
Answer: 39.3%
Calculation: divide(subtract(5.28, 3.79), 3.79)
Explanation: the weighted-average estimated fair values of stock options granted from 2009 to 2010 increased by 39.3%
condition are valued using a monte carlo model . expected volatility is based on historical volatilities of traded common stock of the company and comparative companies using daily stock prices over the past three years . the expected term is three years and the risk-free interest rate is based on the three-year u.s . treasury rate in effect as of the measurement date . the following table provides the weighted average assumptions used in the monte carlo simulation and the weighted average grant date fair values of psus granted for the years ended december 31: .

Table: 2018 2017 2016 expected volatility 17.23% ( 17.23 % ) 17.40% ( 17.40 % ) 15.90% ( 15.90 % ) risk-free interest rate 2.36% ( 2.36 % ) 1.53% ( 1.53 % ) 0.91% ( 0.91 % ) expected life ( years ) 3.0 3.0 3.0 grant date fair value per share $ 73.62 $ 72.81 $ 77.16

the grant date fair value of psus that vest ratably and have market and/or performance conditions are amortized through expense over the requisite service period using the graded-vesting method . if dividends are paid with respect to shares of the company 2019s common stock before the rsus and psus are distributed , the company credits a liability for the value of the dividends that would have been paid if the rsus and psus were shares of company common stock . when the rsus and psus are distributed , the company pays the participant a lump sum cash payment equal to the value of the dividend equivalents accrued . the company accrued dividend equivalents totaling $ 1 million , less than $ 1 million and $ 1 million to accumulated deficit in the accompanying consolidated statements of changes in shareholders 2019 equity for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . employee stock purchase plan the company maintains a nonqualified employee stock purchase plan ( the 201cespp 201d ) through which employee participants may use payroll deductions to acquire company common stock at a discount . prior to february 5 , 2019 , the purchase price of common stock acquired under the espp was the lesser of 90% ( 90 % ) of the fair market value of the common stock at either the beginning or the end of a three -month purchase period . on july 27 , 2018 , the espp was amended , effective february 5 , 2019 , to permit employee participants to acquire company common stock at 85% ( 85 % ) of the fair market value of the common stock at the end of the purchase period . as of december 31 , 2018 , there were 1.9 million shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the espp . the espp is considered compensatory . during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , the company issued 95 thousand , 93 thousand and 93 thousand shares , respectively , under the espp. .

Question: what was the purchase price of common stock acquired under the espp in 2018?
Answer: 66.26
Calculation: multiply(90%, 73.62)