bevaya/FinQA huggingface dataset:
entergy new orleans , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 3.9 million primarily due to higher net revenue , partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses , higher interest expense , and lower other income . 2015 compared to 2014 net income increased $ 13.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses and higher net revenue , partially offset by a higher effective income tax rate . net revenue 2016 compared to 2015 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 . amount ( in millions ) .

Table: amount ( in millions ) 2015 net revenue $ 293.9 retail electric price 39.0 net gas revenue -2.5 ( 2.5 ) volume/weather -5.1 ( 5.1 ) other -8.1 ( 8.1 ) 2016 net revenue $ 317.2

the retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in the purchased power and capacity acquisition cost recovery rider , as approved by the city council , effective with the first billing cycle of march 2016 , primarily related to the purchase of power block 1 of the union power station . see note 14 to the financial statements for discussion of the union power station purchase . the net gas revenue variance is primarily due to the effect of less favorable weather on residential and commercial sales . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to a decrease of 112 gwh , or 2% ( 2 % ) , in billed electricity usage , partially offset by the effect of favorable weather on commercial sales and a 2% ( 2 % ) increase in the average number of electric customers. .

Question: the net income increases in 2015 were what percent of the net income changes in 2016?
Answer: 356%
Calculation: divide(13.9, 3.9)
the graph below matches cadence design systems , inc . 2019s cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index , and the nasdaq composite index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 28 , 2002 and tracks it through december 29 , 2007 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the s&p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s&p information technology index 12/29/0712/30/0612/31/051/1/051/3/0412/28/02 cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s & p information technology s & p 500 * $ 100 invested on 12/28/02 in stock or on 12/31/02 in index-including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright b7 2007 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc . all rights reserved . www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm .

Table: 12/28/02 1/3/04 1/1/05 12/31/05 12/30/06 12/29/07 cadence design systems inc . 100.00 149.92 113.38 138.92 147.04 139.82 s & p 500 100.00 128.68 142.69 149.70 173.34 182.87 nasdaq composite 100.00 149.75 164.64 168.60 187.83 205.22 s & p information technology 100.00 147.23 150.99 152.49 165.32 192.28

the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .

Question: what was the difference in percentage cadence design systems , inc . 2019s cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock versus the s&p 500 for the period ending 12/29/07?
Answer: -43.05%
Calculation: subtract(divide(subtract(139.82, const_100), const_100), divide(subtract(182.87, const_100), const_100))
entergy texas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2017 compared to 2016 net income decreased $ 31.4 million primarily due to lower net revenue , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , higher other operation and maintenance expenses , and higher taxes other than income taxes . 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 37.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , the asset write-off of its receivable associated with the spindletop gas storage facility in 2015 , and higher net revenue . net revenue 2017 compared to 2016 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 . amount ( in millions ) .

Table: amount ( in millions ) 2016 net revenue $ 644.2 net wholesale revenue -35.1 ( 35.1 ) purchased power capacity -5.9 ( 5.9 ) transmission revenue -5.4 ( 5.4 ) reserve equalization 5.6 retail electric price 19.0 other 4.4 2017 net revenue $ 626.8

the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to lower net capacity revenues resulting from the termination of the purchased power agreements between entergy louisiana and entergy texas in august 2016 . the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to increased expenses due to capacity cost changes for ongoing purchased power capacity contracts . the transmission revenue variance is primarily due to a decrease in the amount of transmission revenues allocated by miso . the reserve equalization variance is due to the absence of reserve equalization expenses in 2017 as a result of entergy texas 2019s exit from the system agreement in august 2016 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the system agreement. .

Question: what percent did net revenue decrease between 2016 and 2017?
Answer: 2.7%
Calculation: divide(subtract(644.2, 626.8), 644.2)
note 9 2014goodwill and other intangibles , net goodwill the following table outlines the activity in the carrying value of the company 2019s goodwill , which is all assigned to the company 2019s trading and investing segment ( dollars in thousands ) : .

Table: trading & investing balance at december 31 2011 $ 1934232 activity 2014 balance at december 31 2012 1934232 impairment of goodwill -142423 ( 142423 ) balance at december 31 2013 $ 1791809

goodwill is evaluated for impairment on an annual basis and when events or changes indicate the carrying value of an asset exceeds its fair value and the loss may not be recoverable . at december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , the company 2019s trading and investing segment had two reporting units ; market making and retail brokerage . at the end of june 2013 , the company decided to exit its market making business . based on this decision in the second quarter of 2013 , the company conducted an interim goodwill impairment test for the market making reporting unit , using the expected sale structure of the market making business . this structure assumed a shorter period of cash flows related to an order flow arrangement , compared to prior estimates of fair value . based on the results of the first step of the goodwill impairment test , the company determined that the carrying value of the market making reporting unit , including goodwill , exceeded the fair value for that reporting unit as of june 30 , 2013 . the company proceeded to the second step of the goodwill impairment test to measure the amount of goodwill impairment . as a result of the evaluation , it was determined that the entire carrying amount of goodwill allocated to the market making reporting unit was impaired , and the company recognized a $ 142.4 million impairment of goodwill during the second quarter of 2013 . for the year ended december 31 , 2013 , the company performed its annual goodwill assessment for the retail brokerage reporting unit , electing to qualitatively assess whether it was more likely than not that the fair value was less than the carrying value . as a result of this assessment , the company determined that the first step of the goodwill impairment test was not necessary , and concluded that goodwill was not impaired at december 31 , 2013 . at december 31 , 2013 , goodwill is net of accumulated impairment losses of $ 142.4 million related to the trading and investing segment and $ 101.2 million in the balance sheet management segment . at december 31 , 2012 , goodwill is net of accumulated impairment losses of $ 101.2 million in the balance sheet management segment. .

Question: what was the percentage change in carrying value of the company 2019s goodwill between 2012 and 2013?
Answer: -7%
Calculation: divide(-142423, 1934232)
notes to the consolidated financial statements union pacific corporation and subsidiary companies for purposes of this report , unless the context otherwise requires , all references herein to the 201ccorporation 201d , 201cupc 201d , 201cwe 201d , 201cus 201d , and 201cour 201d mean union pacific corporation and its subsidiaries , including union pacific railroad company , which will be separately referred to herein as 201cuprr 201d or the 201crailroad 201d . 1 . nature of operations operations and segmentation 2013 we are a class i railroad that operates in the united states . we have 32094 route miles , linking pacific coast and gulf coast ports with the midwest and eastern united states gateways and providing several corridors to key mexican gateways . we serve the western two- thirds of the country and maintain coordinated schedules with other rail carriers for the handling of freight to and from the atlantic coast , the pacific coast , the southeast , the southwest , canada , and mexico . export and import traffic is moved through gulf coast and pacific coast ports and across the mexican and canadian borders . the railroad , along with its subsidiaries and rail affiliates , is our one reportable operating segment . although revenues are analyzed by commodity group , we analyze the net financial results of the railroad as one segment due to the integrated nature of our rail network . the following table provides revenue by commodity group : millions of dollars 2009 2008 2007 .

Table: millions of dollars 2009 2008 2007 agricultural $ 2666 $ 3174 $ 2605 automotive 854 1344 1458 chemicals 2102 2494 2287 energy 3118 3810 3134 industrial products 2147 3273 3077 intermodal 2486 3023 2925 total freight revenues $ 13373 $ 17118 $ 15486 other revenues 770 852 797 total operating revenues $ 14143 $ 17970 $ 16283

although our revenues are principally derived from customers domiciled in the united states , the ultimate points of origination or destination for some products transported are outside the united states . basis of presentation 2013 the consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the united states of america ( gaap ) as codified in the financial accounting standards board ( fasb ) accounting standards codification ( asc ) . subsequent events evaluation 2013 we evaluated the effects of all subsequent events through february 5 , 2010 , the date of this report , which is concurrent with the date we file this report with the u.s . securities and exchange commission ( sec ) . 2 . significant accounting policies change in accounting principle 2013 we have historically accounted for rail grinding costs as a capital asset . beginning in the first quarter of 2010 , we will change our accounting policy for rail grinding costs .

Question: for 2009 , what was freight revenue per route mile?
Answer: 416682
Calculation: divide(multiply(13373, const_1000000), 32094)
entergy arkansas , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2004 compared to 2003 net income increased $ 16.2 million due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , a lower effective income tax rate for 2004 compared to 2003 , and lower interest charges . the increase was partially offset by lower net revenue . 2003 compared to 2002 net income decreased $ 9.6 million due to lower net revenue , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , and a higher effective income tax rate for 2003 compared to 2002 . the decrease was substantially offset by lower other operation and maintenance expenses , higher other income , and lower interest charges . net revenue 2004 compared to 2003 net revenue , which is entergy arkansas' measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2004 to 2003. .

Table: ( in millions ) 2003 net revenue $ 998.7 deferred fuel cost revisions -16.9 ( 16.9 ) other -3.4 ( 3.4 ) 2004 net revenue $ 978.4

deferred fuel cost revisions includes the difference between the estimated deferred fuel expense and the actual calculation of recoverable fuel expense , which occurs on an annual basis . deferred fuel cost revisions decreased net revenue due to a revised estimate of fuel costs filed for recovery at entergy arkansas in the march 2004 energy cost recovery rider , which reduced net revenue by $ 11.5 million . the remainder of the variance is due to the 2002 energy cost recovery true-up , made in the first quarter of 2003 , which increased net revenue in 2003 . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory credits gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : 2022 an increase of $ 20.7 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to an increase in the energy cost recovery rider effective april 2004 ( fuel cost recovery revenues are discussed in note 2 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements ) ; 2022 an increase of $ 15.5 million in grand gulf revenues due to an increase in the grand gulf rider effective january 2004 ; 2022 an increase of $ 13.9 million in gross wholesale revenue primarily due to increased sales to affiliated systems ; 2022 an increase of $ 9.5 million due to volume/weather primarily resulting from increased usage during the unbilled sales period , partially offset by the effect of milder weather on billed sales in 2004. .

Question: what is the net change in net revenue during 2004 for entergy arkansas inc.?
Answer: -20.3
Calculation: subtract(978.4, 998.7)
mastercard incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( in thousands , except percent and per share data ) upon termination of employment , excluding retirement , all of a participant 2019s unvested awards are forfeited . however , when a participant terminates employment due to retirement , the participant generally retains all of their awards without providing additional service to the company . eligible retirement is dependent upon age and years of service , as follows : age 55 with ten years of service , age 60 with five years of service and age 65 with two years of service . compensation expense is recognized over the shorter of the vesting periods stated in the ltip , or the date the individual becomes eligible to retire . there are 11550 shares of class a common stock reserved for equity awards under the ltip . although the ltip permits the issuance of shares of class b common stock , no such shares have been reserved for issuance . shares issued as a result of option exercises and the conversions of rsus are expected to be funded with the issuance of new shares of class a common stock . stock options the fair value of each option is estimated on the date of grant using a black-scholes option pricing model . the following table presents the weighted-average assumptions used in the valuation and the resulting weighted- average fair value per option granted for the years ended december 31: .

Table: 2009 2008 2007 risk-free rate of return 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) 3.2% ( 3.2 % ) 4.4% ( 4.4 % ) expected term ( in years ) 6.17 6.25 6.25 expected volatility 41.7% ( 41.7 % ) 37.9% ( 37.9 % ) 30.9% ( 30.9 % ) expected dividend yield 0.4% ( 0.4 % ) 0.3% ( 0.3 % ) 0.6% ( 0.6 % ) weighted-average fair value per option granted $ 71.03 $ 78.54 $ 41.03

the risk-free rate of return was based on the u.s . treasury yield curve in effect on the date of grant . the company utilizes the simplified method for calculating the expected term of the option based on the vesting terms and the contractual life of the option . the expected volatility for options granted during 2009 was based on the average of the implied volatility of mastercard and a blend of the historical volatility of mastercard and the historical volatility of a group of companies that management believes is generally comparable to mastercard . the expected volatility for options granted during 2008 was based on the average of the implied volatility of mastercard and the historical volatility of a group of companies that management believes is generally comparable to mastercard . as the company did not have sufficient publicly traded stock data historically , the expected volatility for options granted during 2007 was primarily based on the average of the historical and implied volatility of a group of companies that management believed was generally comparable to mastercard . the expected dividend yields were based on the company 2019s expected annual dividend rate on the date of grant. .

Question: what was the percent of the change in the risk-free rate of return from 2008 to 2009
Answer: 21.9%
Calculation: divide(subtract(2.5, 3.2), 3.2)
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements the allocation of the purchase price was finalized during the year ended december 31 , 2012 . the following table summarizes the allocation of the aggregate purchase consideration paid and the amounts of assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair value at the date of acquisition ( in thousands ) : purchase price allocation .

Table: final purchase price allocation non-current assets $ 2 property and equipment 3590 intangible assets ( 1 ) 1062 other non-current liabilities -91 ( 91 ) fair value of net assets acquired $ 4563 goodwill ( 2 ) 89

( 1 ) consists of customer-related intangibles of approximately $ 0.4 million and network location intangibles of approximately $ 0.7 million . the customer-related intangibles and network location intangibles are being amortized on a straight-line basis over periods of up to 20 years . ( 2 ) the company expects that the goodwill recorded will be deductible for tax purposes . the goodwill was allocated to the company 2019s international rental and management segment . colombia 2014colombia movil acquisition 2014on july 17 , 2011 , the company entered into a definitive agreement with colombia movil s.a . e.s.p . ( 201ccolombia movil 201d ) , whereby atc sitios infraco , s.a.s. , a colombian subsidiary of the company ( 201catc infraco 201d ) , would purchase up to 2126 communications sites from colombia movil for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $ 182.0 million . from december 21 , 2011 through the year ended december 31 , 2012 , atc infraco completed the purchase of 1526 communications sites for an aggregate purchase price of $ 136.2 million ( including contingent consideration of $ 17.3 million ) , subject to post-closing adjustments . through a subsidiary , millicom international cellular s.a . ( 201cmillicom 201d ) exercised its option to acquire an indirect , substantial non-controlling interest in atc infraco . under the terms of the agreement , the company is required to make additional payments upon the conversion of certain barter agreements with other wireless carriers to cash paying lease agreements . based on the company 2019s current estimates , the value of potential contingent consideration payments required to be made under the amended agreement is expected to be between zero and $ 32.8 million and is estimated to be $ 17.3 million using a probability weighted average of the expected outcomes at december 31 , 2012 . during the year ended december 31 , 2012 , the company recorded a reduction in fair value of $ 1.2 million , which is included in other operating expenses in the consolidated statements of operations. .

Question: what was the cost per tower in the colombia movil acquisition?
Answer: 856067
Calculation: divide(multiply(182.0, const_1000000), 2126)
course of business , we actively manage our exposure to these market risks by entering into various hedging transactions , authorized under established policies that place clear controls on these activities . the counterparties in these transactions are generally highly rated institutions . we establish credit limits for each counterparty . our hedging transactions include but are not limited to a variety of derivative financial instruments . for information on interest rate , foreign exchange , commodity price , and equity instrument risk , please see note 7 to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report . value at risk the estimates in the table below are intended to measure the maximum potential fair value we could lose in one day from adverse changes in market interest rates , foreign exchange rates , commodity prices , and equity prices under normal market conditions . a monte carlo value-at-risk ( var ) methodology was used to quantify the market risk for our exposures . the models assumed normal market conditions and used a 95 percent confidence level . the var calculation used historical interest and foreign exchange rates , and commodity and equity prices from the past year to estimate the potential volatility and correlation of these rates in the future . the market data were drawn from the riskmetrics 2122 data set . the calculations are not intended to represent actual losses in fair value that we expect to incur . further , since the hedging instrument ( the derivative ) inversely correlates with the underlying exposure , we would expect that any loss or gain in the fair value of our derivatives would be generally offset by an increase or decrease in the fair value of the underlying exposure . the positions included in the calculations were : debt ; investments ; interest rate swaps ; foreign exchange forwards ; commodity swaps , futures , and options ; and equity instruments . the calculations do not include the underlying foreign exchange and commodities or equity-related positions that are offset by these market-risk-sensitive instruments . the table below presents the estimated maximum potential var arising from a one-day loss in fair value for our interest rate , foreign currency , commodity , and equity market-risk-sensitive instruments outstanding as of may 27 , 2018 and may 28 , 2017 , and the average fair value impact during the year ended may 27 , 2018. .

Table: in millions fair value impact may 27 2018 fair value impact averageduringfiscal 2018 fair value impact may 282017 interest rate instruments $ 33.2 $ 27.5 $ 25.1 foreign currency instruments 21.3 23.1 24.6 commodity instruments 1.9 2.1 3.2 equity instruments 2.0 1.4 1.3

.

Question: what is the net change in interest rate instruments from 2017 to 2018?
Answer: 8.1
Calculation: subtract(33.2, 25.1)