bevaya/FinQA huggingface dataset:
s c h e d u l e i v ace limited and subsidiaries s u p p l e m e n t a l i n f o r m a t i o n c o n c e r n i n g r e i n s u r a n c e premiums earned for the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2008 , and 2007 ( in millions of u.s . dollars , except for percentages ) direct amount ceded to companies assumed from other companies net amount percentage of amount assumed to .

Table: for the years ended december 31 2009 2008 and 2007 ( in millions of u.s . dollars except for percentages ) direct amount ceded to other companies assumed from other companies net amount percentage of amount assumed to net 2009 $ 15415 $ 5943 $ 3768 $ 13240 28% ( 28 % ) 2008 $ 16087 $ 6144 $ 3260 $ 13203 25% ( 25 % ) 2007 $ 14673 $ 5834 $ 3458 $ 12297 28% ( 28 % )

.

Question: what percent of the direct amount is assumed from other companies in 2009 , ( in millions ) ?
Answer: 24.4%
Calculation: divide(3768, 15415)
stock performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or the securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that sysco specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following stock performance graph compares the performance of sysco 2019s common stock to the s&p 500 index and to the s&p 500 food/ staple retail index for sysco 2019s last five fiscal years . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the s&p 500 food/staple index was $ 100 on the last trading day of fiscal 2006 , and that all dividends were reinvested . performance data for sysco , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 food/ staple retail index is provided as of the last trading day of each of our last five fiscal years . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return assumes initial investment of $ 100 .

Table: 7/1/06 6/30/07 6/28/08 6/27/09 7/3/10 7/2/11 sysco corporation $ 100 $ 110 $ 97 $ 82 $ 105 $ 120 s&p 500 100 120 105 77 88 117 s&p 500 food/staple retail index 100 107 111 92 93 120

.

Question: what was the difference in percentage return of sysco corporation and the s&p 500 for the five years ended 7/2/11?
Answer: 3%
Calculation: subtract(divide(subtract(120, 100), 100), divide(subtract(117, 100), 100))
table of content part ii item 5 . market for the registrant's common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities our common stock is traded on the new york stock exchange under the trading symbol 201chfc . 201d in september 2018 , our board of directors approved a $ 1 billion share repurchase program , which replaced all existing share repurchase programs , authorizing us to repurchase common stock in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions . the timing and amount of stock repurchases will depend on market conditions and corporate , regulatory and other relevant considerations . this program may be discontinued at any time by the board of directors . the following table includes repurchases made under this program during the fourth quarter of 2018 . period total number of shares purchased average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs maximum dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs .

Table: period total number ofshares purchased average pricepaid per share total number ofshares purchasedas part of publicly announced plans or programs maximum dollarvalue of sharesthat may yet bepurchased under the plans or programs october 2018 1360987 $ 66.34 1360987 $ 859039458 november 2018 450000 $ 61.36 450000 $ 831427985 december 2018 912360 $ 53.93 810000 $ 787613605 total for october to december 2018 2723347 2620987

during the quarter ended december 31 , 2018 , 102360 shares were withheld from certain executives and employees under the terms of our share-based compensation agreements to provide funds for the payment of payroll and income taxes due at vesting of restricted stock awards . as of february 13 , 2019 , we had approximately 97419 stockholders , including beneficial owners holding shares in street name . we intend to consider the declaration of a dividend on a quarterly basis , although there is no assurance as to future dividends since they are dependent upon future earnings , capital requirements , our financial condition and other factors. .

Question: for the quarter ended december 312018 what was the percentage of shares acquired in december
Answer: 33.5%
Calculation: divide(912360, 2723347)
lkq corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 5 . long-term obligations ( continued ) as part of the consideration for business acquisitions completed during 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , we issued promissory notes totaling approximately $ 1.7 million , $ 7.2 million and $ 6.4 million , respectively . the notes bear interest at annual rates of 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) to 6.0% ( 6.0 % ) , and interest is payable at maturity or in monthly installments . we also assumed certain liabilities in connection with a business acquisition during the second quarter of 2005 , including a promissory note with a remaining principle balance of approximately $ 0.2 million . the annual interest rate on the note , which was retired during 2006 , was note 6 . commitments and contingencies operating leases we are obligated under noncancelable operating leases for corporate office space , warehouse and distribution facilities , trucks and certain equipment . the future minimum lease commitments under these leases at december 31 , 2007 are as follows ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31: .

Table: 2008 $ 42335 2009 33249 2010 25149 2011 17425 2012 11750 thereafter 28581 future minimum lease payments $ 158489

rental expense for operating leases was approximately $ 27.4 million , $ 18.6 million and $ 12.2 million during the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . we guaranty the residual values of the majority of our truck and equipment operating leases . the residual values decline over the lease terms to a defined percentage of original cost . in the event the lessor does not realize the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be responsible for a portion of the shortfall . similarly , if the lessor realizes more than the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be paid the amount realized over the residual value . had we terminated all of our operating leases subject to these guaranties at december 31 , 2007 , the guarantied residual value would have totaled approximately $ 24.0 million . litigation and related contingencies on december 2 , 2005 , ford global technologies , llc ( 2018 2018ford 2019 2019 ) filed a complaint with the united states international trade commission ( 2018 2018usitc 2019 2019 ) against keystone and five other named respondents , including four taiwan-based manufacturers . on december 12 , 2005 , ford filed an amended complaint . both the complaint and the amended complaint contended that keystone and the other respondents infringed 14 design patents that ford alleges cover eight parts on the 2004-2005 .

Question: what was the percentage change in rental expense from 2005 to 2006?
Answer: 52%
Calculation: divide(subtract(18.6, 12.2), 12.2)
performance graph the performance graph below shows the five-year cumulative total stockholder return on applied common stock during the period from october 28 , 2007 through october 28 , 2012 . this is compared with the cumulative total return of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and the rdg semiconductor composite index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on october 28 , 2007 in applied common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , if any . dollar amounts in the graph are rounded to the nearest whole dollar . the performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among applied materials , inc. , the s&p 500 index and the rdg semiconductor composite index * $ 100 invested on 10/28/07 in stock or 10/31/07 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2012 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved. .

Table: 10/28/2007 10/26/2008 10/25/2009 10/31/2010 10/30/2011 10/28/2012 applied materials 100.00 61.22 71.06 69.23 72.37 62.92 s&p 500 index 100.00 63.90 70.17 81.76 88.37 101.81 rdg semiconductor composite index 100.00 54.74 68.59 84.46 91.33 82.37

dividends during fiscal 2012 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends in the amount of $ 0.09 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend in the amount of $ 0.08 per share . during fiscal 2011 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends in the amount of $ 0.08 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend in the amount of $ 0.07 per share . during fiscal 2010 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends in the amount of $ 0.07 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend in the amount of $ 0.06 . dividends declared during fiscal 2012 , 2011 and 2010 amounted to $ 438 million , $ 408 million and $ 361 million , respectively . applied currently anticipates that it will continue to pay cash dividends on a quarterly basis in the future , although the declaration and amount of any future cash dividends are at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on applied 2019s financial condition , results of operations , capital requirements , business conditions and other factors , as well as a determination that cash dividends are in the best interests of applied 2019s stockholders . 10/28/07 10/26/08 10/25/09 10/31/10 10/30/11 10/28/12 applied materials , inc . s&p 500 rdg semiconductor composite .

Question: how much did the quarterly dividend yield change from 2010 to 2012 for applied materials?
Answer: the dividend yield increased 0.04% from 2010 to 2012
Calculation: subtract(divide(0.09, 62.92), divide(0.07, 69.23))
Explanation: to figure out the dividend yield one must take the dividend amount and divide by the stock price . in this example , once you find both dividend yields you need to subtract the smaller one from the larger one to get 0.04% .
item 2 : properties information concerning applied 2019s properties is set forth below: .

Table: ( square feet in thousands ) united states other countries total owned 4530 2417 6947 leased 1037 1341 2378 total 5567 3758 9325

because of the interrelation of applied 2019s operations , properties within a country may be shared by the segments operating within that country . the company 2019s headquarters offices are in santa clara , california . products in semiconductor systems are manufactured in santa clara , california ; austin , texas ; gloucester , massachusetts ; kalispell , montana ; rehovot , israel ; and singapore . remanufactured equipment products in the applied global services segment are produced primarily in austin , texas . products in the display and adjacent markets segment are manufactured in alzenau , germany and tainan , taiwan . other products are manufactured in treviso , italy . applied also owns and leases offices , plants and warehouse locations in many locations throughout the world , including in europe , japan , north america ( principally the united states ) , israel , china , india , korea , southeast asia and taiwan . these facilities are principally used for manufacturing ; research , development and engineering ; and marketing , sales and customer support . applied also owns a total of approximately 269 acres of buildable land in montana , texas , california , israel and italy that could accommodate additional building space . applied considers the properties that it owns or leases as adequate to meet its current and future requirements . applied regularly assesses the size , capability and location of its global infrastructure and periodically makes adjustments based on these assessments. .

Question: what percentage of buildings are owned in the united states by the company?
Answer: 81.4%
Calculation: divide(4530, 5567)
Explanation: to find the percentage of buildings owned by the company in the u.s . one must divide the buildings owned in the u.s . by the total amount of buildings .
stock performance graph the following graph provides a comparison of five year cumulative total stockholder returns of teleflex common stock , the standard & poor 2019s ( s&p ) 500 stock index and the s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index . the annual changes for the five-year period shown on the graph are based on the assumption that $ 100 had been invested in teleflex common stock and each index on december 31 , 2009 and that all dividends were reinvested . market performance .

Table: company / index 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 teleflex incorporated 100 102 119 142 190 235 s&p 500 index 100 115 117 136 180 205 s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index 100 97 97 113 144 182

s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index 100 97 97 113 144 182 .

Question: what is the rate of return of an investment in teleflex incorporated from 2009 to 2010?
Answer: 2%
Calculation: divide(subtract(102, 100), 100)
stockholder return performance graph the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index on december 31 , 2011 ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 and tracks it each year thereafter on the last day of our fiscal year through december 31 , 2016 and , for each index , on the last day of the calendar year . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/31/1612/28/13 1/2/1612/31/11 1/3/1512/29/12 *$ 100 invested on 12/31/11 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2017 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved. .

Table: 12/31/2011 12/29/2012 12/28/2013 1/3/2015 1/2/2016 12/31/2016 cadence design systems inc . 100.00 129.23 133.94 181.06 200.10 242.50 nasdaq composite 100.00 116.41 165.47 188.69 200.32 216.54 s&p 400 information technology 100.00 118.41 165.38 170.50 178.74 219.65

the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .

Question: what is the rate of return of an investment in cadence design systems from the end of the year in 2015 to the end of the year in 2016?
Answer: 10.5%
Calculation: divide(subtract(200.10, 181.06), 181.06)
average revenue per car 2008 2007 2006 % (  % ) change 2008 v 2007 % (  % ) change 2007 v 2006 .

Table: average revenue per car 2008 2007 2006 % (  % ) change 2008 v 2007 % (  % ) change 2007 v 2006 agricultural $ 3352 $ 2888 $ 2584 16 % (  % ) 12% ( 12 % ) automotive 2017 1766 1710 14 3 chemicals 2818 2464 2326 14 6 energy 1622 1363 1285 19 6 industrial products 2620 2322 2167 13 7 intermodal 955 847 813 13 4 average $ 1848 $ 1591 $ 1501 16 % (  % ) 6% ( 6 % )

agricultural products 2013 price improvements , fuel surcharges , and volume growth generated higher agricultural freight revenue in 2008 versus 2007 . strong global demand for grain and a weak dollar drove higher shipments of corn and feed grains and shipments of wheat and food grains for 2008 . shipments of ethanol , a grain product used as an alternative fuel and fuel additive , and its co- products ( primarily livestock feed ) also increased . price increases were the primary drivers of agricultural freight revenue in 2007 versus 2006 , partially offset by a decline in volume levels . shipments of whole grains used in feed declined as barge operators captured more shipments destined for export from the gulf coast due to both favorable barge rates and improved navigation conditions on the mississippi river . conversely , wheat and food grain shipments improved as a strong wheat crop generated record shipments to the gulf coast for export . shipments of ethanol and its co-products also increased substantially . automotive 2013 double-digit declines in shipments of both finished vehicles and auto parts drove freight revenue lower in 2008 compared to 2007 . price improvements and fuel surcharges partially offset these lower volumes . the manufacturers experienced poor sales and reduced vehicle production during 2008 due to the recessionary economy , which in turn reduced shipments of finished vehicles and parts . in addition , a major parts supplier strike reduced volume levels compared to 2007 . shipments of finished vehicles decreased 23% ( 23 % ) in 2008 versus 2007 . in 2007 , price increases drove the growth in automotive revenue , partially offset by lower finished vehicle shipments versus 2006 . a decline in vehicle production levels primarily drove the volume decline . conversely , automotive parts shipments grew due to increased volumes from domestic manufacturers , new business acquired in the middle of 2006 , and our new intermodal train service between mexico and michigan . 2008 agricultural revenue 2008 automotive revenue .

Question: in 2008 what was the ratio of the average revenue per car for the agriculture products to energy
Answer: 2.1
Calculation: divide(3352, 1622)
during 2014 , $ 91 million of provision recapture was recorded for purchased impaired loans compared to $ 11 million of provision expense for 2013 . the charge-offs ( which were specifically for commercial loans greater than a defined threshold ) during 2014 were $ 42 million compared to $ 104 million for 2013 . at december 31 , 2014 , the allowance for loan and lease losses was $ .9 billion on $ 4.4 billion of purchased impaired loans while the remaining $ .5 billion of purchased impaired loans required no allowance as the net present value of expected cash flows equaled or exceeded the recorded investment . as of december 31 , 2013 , the allowance for loan and lease losses related to purchased impaired loans was $ 1.0 billion . if any allowance for loan losses is recognized on a purchased impaired pool , which is accounted for as a single asset , the entire balance of that pool would be disclosed as requiring an allowance . subsequent increases in the net present value of cash flows will result in a provision recapture of any previously recorded allowance for loan and lease losses , to the extent applicable , and/or a reclassification from non-accretable difference to accretable yield , which will be recognized prospectively . individual loan transactions where final dispositions have occurred ( as noted above ) result in removal of the loans from their applicable pools for cash flow estimation purposes . the cash flow re-estimation process is completed quarterly to evaluate the appropriateness of the allowance associated with the purchased impaired loans . activity for the accretable yield during 2014 and 2013 follows : table 72 : purchased impaired loans 2013 accretable yield .

Table: in millions 2014 2013 january 1 $ 2055 $ 2166 accretion ( including excess cash recoveries ) -587 ( 587 ) -695 ( 695 ) net reclassifications to accretable from non-accretable ( a ) 208 613 disposals -118 ( 118 ) -29 ( 29 ) december 31 $ 1558 $ 2055

( a ) approximately 93% ( 93 % ) of net reclassifications for the year ended december 31 , 2014 were within the commercial portfolio as compared to 37% ( 37 % ) for year ended december 31 , 2013 . note 5 allowances for loan and lease losses and unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit allowance for loan and lease losses we maintain the alll at levels that we believe to be appropriate to absorb estimated probable credit losses incurred in the portfolios as of the balance sheet date . we use the two main portfolio segments 2013 commercial lending and consumer lending 2013 and develop and document the alll under separate methodologies for each of these segments as discussed in note 1 accounting policies . a rollforward of the alll and associated loan data is presented below . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 143 .

Question: what was the dollar amount in millions for net reclassifications for the year ended december 31 , 2014 due to the commercial portfolio?
Answer: 193.44
Calculation: multiply(208, 93%)
stock performance graph : the graph below shows the cumulative total shareholder return assuming the investment of $ 100 , on december 31 , 2011 , and the reinvestment of dividends thereafter , if any , in the company 2019s common stock versus the standard and poor 2019s s&p 500 retail index ( 201cs&p 500 retail index 201d ) and the standard and poor 2019s s&p 500 index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) . .

Table: company/index december 31 , 2011 december 31 , 2012 december 31 , 2013 december 31 , 2014 december 31 , 2015 december 31 , 2016 o 2019reilly automotive inc . $ 100 $ 112 $ 161 $ 241 $ 317 $ 348 s&p 500 retail index 100 125 180 197 245 257 s&p 500 $ 100 $ 113 $ 147 $ 164 $ 163 $ 178

.

Question: what was the 2012 return on o 2019reilly automotive inc . stock?\\n
Answer: 12
Calculation: subtract(112, 100)