bevaya/FinQA huggingface dataset:
fair value of financial instruments : the company 2019s financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents , marketable securities , accounts receivable , certain investments , accounts payable , borrowings , and derivative contracts . the fair values of cash and cash equivalents , accounts receivable , accounts payable , and short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt approximated carrying values because of the short-term nature of these instruments . available-for-sale marketable securities and investments , in addition to certain derivative instruments , are recorded at fair values as indicated in the preceding disclosures . for its long-term debt the company utilized third-party quotes to estimate fair values ( classified as level 2 ) . information with respect to the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of these financial instruments follow: .

Table: ( millions ) december 31 2012 carrying value december 31 2012 fair value december 31 2012 carrying value fair value long-term debt excluding current portion $ 4916 $ 5363 $ 4484 $ 5002

the fair values reflected above consider the terms of the related debt absent the impacts of derivative/hedging activity . the carrying amount of long-term debt referenced above is impacted by certain fixed-to-floating interest rate swaps that are designated as fair value hedges and by the designation of fixed rate eurobond securities issued by the company as hedging instruments of the company 2019s net investment in its european subsidiaries . 3m 2019s fixed-rate bonds were trading at a premium at december 31 , 2012 and 2011 due to the low interest rates and tightening of 3m 2019s credit spreads. .

Question: in december 2012 what was the percentage difference in the carrying values of the long-term debt excluding current portion
Answer: 9.63%
Calculation: divide(subtract(4916, 4484), 4484)
Explanation: december 2012 the percentage difference in the carrying values of the long-term debt excluding current portion was 9.63%
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the following table summarizes the changes in non-vested restricted stock awards for the year ended may 31 , 2009 ( share awards in thousands ) : share awards weighted average grant-date fair value .

Table: share awards weighted average grant-date fair value non-vested at may 31 2007 278 $ 37 granted 400 38 vested -136 ( 136 ) 30 forfeited -24 ( 24 ) 40 non-vested at may 31 2008 518 39 granted 430 43 vested -159 ( 159 ) 39 forfeited -27 ( 27 ) 41 non-vested at may 31 2009 762 42

the weighted average grant-date fair value of share awards granted in the years ended may 31 , 2008 and 2007 was $ 38 and $ 45 , respectively . the total fair value of share awards vested during the years ended may 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 was $ 6.2 million , $ 4.1 million and $ 1.7 million , respectively . we recognized compensation expense for restricted stock of $ 9.0 million , $ 5.7 million , and $ 2.7 million in the years ended may 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 . as of may 31 , 2009 , there was $ 23.5 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock awards that is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.9 years . employee stock purchase plan we have an employee stock purchase plan under which the sale of 2.4 million shares of our common stock has been authorized . employees may designate up to the lesser of $ 25000 or 20% ( 20 % ) of their annual compensation for the purchase of stock . the price for shares purchased under the plan is 85% ( 85 % ) of the market value on the last day of the quarterly purchase period . as of may 31 , 2009 , 0.8 million shares had been issued under this plan , with 1.6 million shares reserved for future issuance . the weighted average grant-date fair value of each designated share purchased under this plan was $ 6 , $ 6 and $ 8 in the years ended may 31 , 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . these values represent the fair value of the 15% ( 15 % ) discount . note 12 2014segment information general information during fiscal 2009 , we began assessing our operating performance using a new segment structure . we made this change as a result of our june 30 , 2008 acquisition of 51% ( 51 % ) of hsbc merchant services llp in the united kingdom , in addition to anticipated future international expansion . beginning with the quarter ended august 31 , 2008 , the reportable segments are defined as north america merchant services , international merchant services , and money transfer . the following tables reflect these changes and such reportable segments for fiscal years 2009 , 2008 , and 2007. .

Question: what is the total value of non-vested shares as of may 31 , 2009 , ( in millions ) ?
Answer: 32.0
Calculation: divide(multiply(762, 42), const_1000)
j.p . morgan chase & co . / 2003 annual report 33 corporate credit allocation in 2003 , tss was assigned a corporate credit allocation of pre- tax earnings and the associated capital related to certain credit exposures managed within ib 2019s credit portfolio on behalf of clients shared with tss . prior periods have been revised to reflect this allocation . for 2003 , the impact to tss of this change increased pre-tax operating results by $ 36 million and average allocated capital by $ 712 million , and it decreased sva by $ 65 million . pre-tax operating results were $ 46 million lower than in 2002 , reflecting lower loan volumes and higher related expenses , slightly offset by a decrease in credit costs . business outlook tss revenue in 2004 is expected to benefit from improved global equity markets and from two recent acquisitions : the november 2003 acquisition of the bank one corporate trust portfolio , and the january 2004 acquisition of citigroup 2019s electronic funds services business . tss also expects higher costs as it integrates these acquisitions and continues strategic investments to sup- port business expansion . by client segment tss dimensions of 2003 revenue diversification by business revenue by geographic region investor services 36% ( 36 % ) other 1% ( 1 % ) institutional trust services 23% ( 23 % ) treasury services 40% ( 40 % ) large corporations 21% ( 21 % ) middle market 18% ( 18 % ) banks 11% ( 11 % ) nonbank financial institutions 44% ( 44 % ) public sector/governments 6% ( 6 % ) europe , middle east & africa 27% ( 27 % ) asia/pacific 9% ( 9 % ) the americas 64% ( 64 % ) ( a ) includes the elimination of revenue related to shared activities with chase middle market in the amount of $ 347 million . year ended december 31 , operating revenue .

Table: year ended december 31 , ( in millions ) year ended december 31 , 2003 year ended december 31 , 2002 change treasury services $ 1927 $ 1818 6% ( 6 % ) investor services 1449 1513 -4 ( 4 ) institutional trust services ( a ) 928 864 7 other ( a ) ( b ) -312 ( 312 ) -303 ( 303 ) -3 ( 3 ) total treasury & securities services $ 3992 $ 3892 3% ( 3 % )

( a ) includes a portion of the $ 41 million gain on sale of a nonstrategic business in 2003 : $ 1 million in institutional trust services and $ 40 million in other . ( b ) includes the elimination of revenues related to shared activities with chase middle market , and a $ 50 million gain on sale of a non-u.s . securities clearing firm in 2002. .

Question: how much was 2003 total treasury & securities services without the benefit of the special gain ( in us$ m ) ?
Answer: 3951
Calculation: subtract(3992, 41)
eog resources , inc . supplemental information to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) capitalized costs relating to oil and gas producing activities . the following table sets forth the capitalized costs relating to eog's crude oil and natural gas producing activities at december 31 , 2018 and 2017: .

Table: 2018 2017 proved properties $ 53624809 $ 48845672 unproved properties 3705207 3710069 total 57330016 52555741 accumulated depreciation depletion and amortization -31674085 ( 31674085 ) -29191247 ( 29191247 ) net capitalized costs $ 25655931 $ 23364494

costs incurred in oil and gas property acquisition , exploration and development activities . the acquisition , exploration and development costs disclosed in the following tables are in accordance with definitions in the extractive industries - oil and gas topic of the accounting standards codification ( asc ) . acquisition costs include costs incurred to purchase , lease or otherwise acquire property . exploration costs include additions to exploratory wells , including those in progress , and exploration expenses . development costs include additions to production facilities and equipment and additions to development wells , including those in progress. .

Question: considering the years 2017 and 2018 , what was the increase observed in the net capitalized costs?
Answer: 9.80%
Calculation: subtract(divide(25655931, 23364494), const_1)
Explanation: it is the value of the net capitalized costs of 2018 divided by the 2017's , then subtracted 1 and turned into a percentage .
item 1a . risk factors in addition to the other information provided in this report , the following risk factors should be considered when evaluating an investment in our securities . if the circumstances contemplated by the individual risk factors materialize , our business , financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected and the trading price of our common shares could decline significantly . risks relating to our business fluctuations in the financial markets could result in investment losses . prolonged and severe disruptions in the overall public debt and equity markets , such as occurred during 2008 , could result in significant realized and unrealized losses in our investment portfolio . although financial markets have significantly improved since 2008 , they could deteriorate in the future . there could also be disruption in individual market sectors , such as occurred in the energy sector in recent years . such declines in the financial markets could result in significant realized and unrealized losses on investments and could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations , equity , business and insurer financial strength and debt ratings . our results could be adversely affected by catastrophic events . we are exposed to unpredictable catastrophic events , including weather-related and other natural catastrophes , as well as acts of terrorism . any material reduction in our operating results caused by the occurrence of one or more catastrophes could inhibit our ability to pay dividends or to meet our interest and principal payment obligations . by way of illustration , during the past five calendar years , pre-tax catastrophe losses , net of reinsurance , were as follows: .

Table: calendar year: pre-tax catastrophe losses ( dollars in millions ) 2017 $ 1472.6 2016 301.2 2015 53.8 2014 56.3 2013 194.0

our losses from future catastrophic events could exceed our projections . we use projections of possible losses from future catastrophic events of varying types and magnitudes as a strategic underwriting tool . we use these loss projections to estimate our potential catastrophe losses in certain geographic areas and decide on the placement of retrocessional coverage or other actions to limit the extent of potential losses in a given geographic area . these loss projections are approximations , reliant on a mix of quantitative and qualitative processes , and actual losses may exceed the projections by a material amount , resulting in a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. .

Question: what are the total pre-tax catastrophe losses for the company in the last three years?\\n
Answer: 1827.6
Calculation: add(add(1472.6, 301.2), 53.8)
apple inc . | 2018 form 10-k | 20 company stock performance the following graph shows a comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend-reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index for the five years ended september 29 , 2018 . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index as of the market close on september 27 , 2013 . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . * $ 100 invested on september 27 , 2013 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . data points are the last day of each fiscal year for the company 2019s common stock and september 30th for indexes . copyright a9 2018 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved . copyright a9 2018 s&p dow jones indices llc , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved . september september september september september september .

Table: september2013 september2014 september2015 september2016 september2017 september2018 apple inc . $ 100 $ 149 $ 173 $ 174 $ 242 $ 359 s&p 500 index $ 100 $ 120 $ 119 $ 137 $ 163 $ 192 s&p information technology index $ 100 $ 129 $ 132 $ 162 $ 209 $ 275 dow jones u.s . technology supersector index $ 100 $ 130 $ 130 $ 159 $ 203 $ 266

.

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total return for apple inc . for the five year period ended september 2018?
Answer: 259%
Calculation: divide(subtract(359, 100), 100)
humana inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during 2007 was $ 133.9 million , compared with $ 133.7 million during 2006 and $ 57.8 million during 2005 . cash received from stock option exercises for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 totaled $ 62.7 million , $ 49.2 million , and $ 36.4 million , respectively . total compensation expense related to nonvested options not yet recognized was $ 23.6 million at december 31 , 2007 . we expect to recognize this compensation expense over a weighted average period of approximately 1.6 years . restricted stock awards restricted stock awards are granted with a fair value equal to the market price of our common stock on the date of grant . compensation expense is recorded straight-line over the vesting period , generally three years from the date of grant . the weighted average grant date fair value of our restricted stock awards was $ 63.59 , $ 54.36 , and $ 32.81 for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 , respectively . activity for our restricted stock awards was as follows for the year ended december 31 , 2007 : shares weighted average grant-date fair value .

Table: shares weighted average grant-date fair value nonvested restricted stock at december 31 2006 1107455 $ 45.86 granted 852353 63.59 vested -51206 ( 51206 ) 56.93 forfeited -63624 ( 63624 ) 49.65 nonvested restricted stock at december 31 2007 1844978 $ 53.61

the fair value of shares vested during the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 was $ 3.4 million , $ 2.3 million , and $ 0.6 million , respectively . total compensation expense related to nonvested restricted stock awards not yet recognized was $ 44.7 million at december 31 , 2007 . we expect to recognize this compensation expense over a weighted average period of approximately 1.4 years . there are no other contractual terms covering restricted stock awards once vested. .

Question: for the year ended december 31 , 2007 what was the ratio of the shares granted to the shares vested
Answer: 16.65
Calculation: divide(852353, 51206)
Explanation: for the year ended december 31 , 2007 for every 16.65 shares granted 1 shares was vested
the following graph compares the cumulative 4-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on january 3 , 2009 and tracks it through december 29 , 2012 . comparison of 4 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/29/121/1/11 12/31/111/2/101/3/09 *$ 100 invested on 1/3/09 in stock or 12/31/08 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies all rights reserved. .

Table: 1/3/2009 1/2/2010 1/1/2011 12/31/2011 12/29/2012 cadence design systems inc . 100.00 155.99 215.10 270.83 350.00 nasdaq composite 100.00 139.32 164.84 167.06 187.66 s&p 400 information technology 100.00 151.58 198.02 174.88 201.26

the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .

Question: what is the total return if $ 1000000 are invested in cadence design system in 2009 and sold in 2010?
Answer: 560000
Calculation: multiply(divide(subtract(155.99, const_100), const_100), 1000000)
entergy new orleans , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income ( loss ) 2004 compared to 2003 net income increased $ 20.2 million primarily due to higher net revenue . 2003 compared to 2002 entergy new orleans had net income of $ 7.9 million in 2003 compared to a net loss in 2002 . the increase was due to higher net revenue and lower interest expense , partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses and depreciation and amortization expenses . net revenue 2004 compared to 2003 net revenue , which is entergy new orleans' measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2004 to 2003. .

Table: ( in millions ) 2003 net revenue $ 208.3 base rates 10.6 volume/weather 8.3 2004 deferrals 7.5 price applied to unbilled electric sales 3.7 other 0.6 2004 net revenue $ 239.0

the increase in base rates was effective june 2003 . the rate increase is discussed in note 2 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to increased billed electric usage of 162 gwh in the industrial service sector . the increase was partially offset by milder weather in the residential and commercial sectors . the 2004 deferrals variance is due to the deferral of voluntary severance plan and fossil plant maintenance expenses in accordance with a stipulation approved by the city council in august 2004 . the stipulation allows for the recovery of these costs through amortization of a regulatory asset . the voluntary severance plan and fossil plant maintenance expenses are being amortized over a five-year period that became effective january 2004 and january 2003 , respectively . the formula rate plan is discussed in note 2 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements . the price applied to unbilled electric sales variance is due to an increase in the fuel price applied to unbilled sales. .

Question: what is entergy's net income as a percentage of net revenue in 2003?
Answer: 3.79%
Calculation: divide(7.9, 208.3)
jpmorgan chase & co./2015 annual report 67 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co . ( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index . the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced united states of america ( 201cu.s . 201d ) equity benchmark consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s . and is composed of 24 leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts . the s&p financial index is an index of 87 financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 . the firm is a component of all three industry indices . the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2010 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices . the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested . december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 .

Table: december 31 ( in dollars ) 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 jpmorgan chase $ 100.00 $ 80.03 $ 108.98 $ 148.98 $ 163.71 $ 177.40 kbw bank index 100.00 76.82 102.19 140.77 153.96 154.71 s&p financial index 100.00 82.94 106.78 144.79 166.76 164.15 s&p 500 index 100.00 102.11 118.44 156.78 178.22 180.67

december 31 , ( in dollars ) .

Question: what was the 5 year return of the s&p financial index?
Answer: 64.15%
Calculation: divide(subtract(164.15, const_100), const_100)
maturities of debt the scheduled maturities of the outstanding debt balances , excluding debt fair value adjustments as of december 31 , 2014 , are summarized as follows ( in millions ) : .

Table: year total 2015 $ 2717 2016 1684 2017 3059 2018 2328 2019 2819 thereafter 28422 total $ 41029

_______ interest rates , interest rate swaps and contingent debt the weighted average interest rate on all of our borrowings was 5.02% ( 5.02 % ) during 2014 and 5.08% ( 5.08 % ) during 2013 . information on our interest rate swaps is contained in note 13 . for information about our contingent debt agreements , see note 12 . subsequent event subsequent to december 31 , 2014 , additional ep trust i preferred securities were converted , primarily consisting of 969117 ep trust i preferred securities converted on january 14 , 2015 , into ( i ) 697473 of our class p common stock ; ( ii ) approximately $ 24 million in cash ; and ( iii ) 1066028 in warrants . 9 . share-based compensation and employee benefits share-based compensation kinder morgan , inc . class p shares stock compensation plan for non-employee directors we have a stock compensation plan for non-employee directors , in which our eligible non-employee directors participate . the plan recognizes that the compensation paid to each eligible non-employee director is fixed by our board , generally annually , and that the compensation is payable in cash . pursuant to the plan , in lieu of receiving some or all of the cash compensation , each eligible non-employee director may elect to receive shares of class p common stock . each election will be generally at or around the first board meeting in january of each calendar year and will be effective for the entire calendar year . an eligible director may make a new election each calendar year . the total number of shares of class p common stock authorized under the plan is 250000 . during 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , we made restricted class p common stock grants to our non-employee directors of 6210 , 5710 and 5520 , respectively . these grants were valued at time of issuance at $ 220000 , $ 210000 and $ 185000 , respectively . all of the restricted stock grants made to non-employee directors vest during a six-month period . table of contents .

Question: what percentage of total maturities of debt come due after 2019?
Answer: 69%
Calculation: divide(28422, 41029)