bevaya/FinQA huggingface dataset:
part ii price range our common stock commenced trading on the nasdaq national market under the symbol 201cmktx 201d on november 5 , 2004 . prior to that date , there was no public market for our common stock . the high and low bid information for our common stock , as reported by nasdaq , was as follows : on march 8 , 2006 , the last reported closing price of our common stock on the nasdaq national market was $ 12.59 . holders there were approximately 114 holders of record of our common stock as of march 8 , 2006 . dividend policy we have not declared or paid any cash dividends on our capital stock since our inception . we intend to retain future earnings to finance the operation and expansion of our business and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future . in the event we decide to declare dividends on our common stock in the future , such declaration will be subject to the discretion of our board of directors . our board may take into account such matters as general business conditions , our financial results , capital requirements , contractual , legal , and regulatory restrictions on the payment of dividends by us to our stockholders or by our subsidiaries to us and any such other factors as our board may deem relevant . use of proceeds on november 4 , 2004 , the registration statement relating to our initial public offering ( no . 333-112718 ) was declared effective . we received net proceeds from the sale of the shares of our common stock in the offering of $ 53.9 million , at an initial public offering price of $ 11.00 per share , after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses . except for salaries , and reimbursements for travel expenses and other out-of -pocket costs incurred in the ordinary course of business , none of the proceeds from the offering have been paid by us , directly or indirectly , to any of our directors or officers or any of their associates , or to any persons owning ten percent or more of our outstanding stock or to any of our affiliates . we have invested the proceeds from the offering in cash and cash equivalents and short-term marketable securities . item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities .

Table: high low november 5 2004 to december 31 2004 $ 24.41 $ 12.75 january 1 2005 to march 31 2005 $ 15.95 $ 9.64 april 1 2005 to june 30 2005 $ 13.87 $ 9.83 july 1 2005 to september 30 2005 $ 14.09 $ 9.99 october 1 2005 to december 31 2005 $ 13.14 $ 10.64

.

Question: for the period july 1 2005 to september 30 2005 , what was the lowest share price>
Answer: 9.99
Calculation: table_min(july 1 2005 to september 30 2005, none)
12 . brokerage receivables and brokerage payables citi has receivables and payables for financial instruments sold to and purchased from brokers , dealers and customers , which arise in the ordinary course of business . citi is exposed to risk of loss from the inability of brokers , dealers or customers to pay for purchases or to deliver the financial instruments sold , in which case citi would have to sell or purchase the financial instruments at prevailing market prices . credit risk is reduced to the extent that an exchange or clearing organization acts as a counterparty to the transaction and replaces the broker , dealer or customer in question . citi seeks to protect itself from the risks associated with customer activities by requiring customers to maintain margin collateral in compliance with regulatory and internal guidelines . margin levels are monitored daily , and customers deposit additional collateral as required . where customers cannot meet collateral requirements , citi may liquidate sufficient underlying financial instruments to bring the customer into compliance with the required margin level . exposure to credit risk is impacted by market volatility , which may impair the ability of clients to satisfy their obligations to citi . credit limits are established and closely monitored for customers and for brokers and dealers engaged in forwards , futures and other transactions deemed to be credit sensitive . brokerage receivables and brokerage payables consisted of the following: .

Table: in millions of dollars december 31 , 2017 december 31 , 2016 receivables from customers $ 19215 $ 10374 receivables from brokers dealers and clearing organizations 19169 18513 total brokerage receivables ( 1 ) $ 38384 $ 28887 payables to customers $ 38741 $ 37237 payables to brokers dealers and clearing organizations 22601 19915 total brokerage payables ( 1 ) $ 61342 $ 57152

payables to brokers , dealers and clearing organizations 22601 19915 total brokerage payables ( 1 ) $ 61342 $ 57152 ( 1 ) includes brokerage receivables and payables recorded by citi broker- dealer entities that are accounted for in accordance with the aicpa accounting guide for brokers and dealers in securities as codified in asc 940-320. .

Question: what was the percentage increased in the total brokerage payables from 2016 to 2017
Answer: 7.3%
Calculation: divide(subtract(61342, 57152), 57152)
Explanation: the total brokerage payables increased by 7.3% from 2016 to 2017
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity and related stockholder matters recent sales of unregistered securities during the fourth quarter of 2003 , aes issued an aggregated of 20.2 million shares of its common stock in exchange for $ 20 million aggregate principal amount of its senior notes . the shares were issued without registration in reliance upon section 3 ( a ) ( 9 ) under the securities act of 1933 . market information our common stock is currently traded on the new york stock exchange ( 2018 2018nyse 2019 2019 ) under the symbol 2018 2018aes . 2019 2019 the following tables set forth the high and low sale prices for our common stock as reported by the nyse for the periods indicated . price range of common stock .

Table: 2003 first quarter high $ 4.04 low $ 2.72 2002 first quarter high $ 17.84 low $ 4.11 second quarter 8.37 3.75 second quarter 9.17 3.55 third quarter 7.70 5.91 third quarter 4.61 1.56 fourth quarter 9.50 7.57 fourth quarter 3.57 0.95

holders as of march 3 , 2004 , there were 9026 record holders of our common stock , par value $ 0.01 per share . dividends under the terms of our senior secured credit facilities , which we entered into with a commercial bank syndicate , we are not allowed to pay cash dividends . in addition , under the terms of a guaranty we provided to the utility customer in connection with the aes thames project , we are precluded from paying cash dividends on our common stock if we do not meet certain net worth and liquidity tests . our project subsidiaries 2019 ability to declare and pay cash dividends to us is subject to certain limitations contained in the project loans , governmental provisions and other agreements that our project subsidiaries are subject to . see item 12 ( d ) of this form 10-k for information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans. .

Question: what was the difference in the low price for the first quarter of 2003 and the high price for the fourth quarter of 2003?
Answer: 6.78
Calculation: subtract(9.50, 2.72)
system energy resources , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis also in addition to the contractual obligations , system energy has $ 382.3 million of unrecognized tax benefits and interest net of unused tax attributes and payments for which the timing of payments beyond 12 months cannot be reasonably estimated due to uncertainties in the timing of effective settlement of tax positions . see note 3 to the financial statements for additional information regarding unrecognized tax benefits . in addition to routine spending to maintain operations , the planned capital investment estimate includes specific investments and initiatives such as the nuclear fleet operational excellence initiative , as discussed below in 201cnuclear matters , 201d and plant improvements . as a wholly-owned subsidiary , system energy dividends its earnings to entergy corporation at a percentage determined monthly . sources of capital system energy 2019s sources to meet its capital requirements include : 2022 internally generated funds ; 2022 cash on hand ; 2022 debt issuances ; and 2022 bank financing under new or existing facilities . system energy may refinance , redeem , or otherwise retire debt prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest and dividend rates are favorable . all debt and common stock issuances by system energy require prior regulatory approval . debt issuances are also subject to issuance tests set forth in its bond indentures and other agreements . system energy has sufficient capacity under these tests to meet its foreseeable capital needs . system energy 2019s receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. .

Table: 2016 2015 2014 2013 ( in thousands ) ( in thousands ) ( in thousands ) ( in thousands ) $ 33809 $ 39926 $ 2373 $ 9223

see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . the system energy nuclear fuel company variable interest entity has a credit facility in the amount of $ 120 million scheduled to expire in may 2019 . as of december 31 , 2016 , $ 66.9 million in letters of credit were outstanding under the credit facility to support a like amount of commercial paper issued by the system energy nuclear fuel company variable interest entity . see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the variable interest entity credit facility . system energy obtained authorizations from the ferc through october 2017 for the following : 2022 short-term borrowings not to exceed an aggregate amount of $ 200 million at any time outstanding ; 2022 long-term borrowings and security issuances ; and 2022 long-term borrowings by its nuclear fuel company variable interest entity . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of system energy 2019s short-term borrowing limits. .

Question: as of december 31 , 2016 , what is the remaining capacity ( in millions ) for the credit facility scheduled to expire in may 2019?
Answer: 53.1
Calculation: subtract(120, 66.9)
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements liability to $ 60 million , and recorded the $ 2.7 million difference as a credit to interest expense . the $ 60 million remaining liability was eliminated upon payment of the cash portion of the purchase price . as of december 31 , 2016 , entergy louisiana , in connection with the waterford 3 lease obligation , had a future minimum lease payment ( reflecting an interest rate of 8.09% ( 8.09 % ) ) of $ 57.5 million , including $ 2.3 million in interest , due january 2017 that is recorded as long-term debt . in february 2017 the leases were terminated and the leased assets were conveyed to entergy louisiana . grand gulf lease obligations in 1988 , in two separate but substantially identical transactions , system energy sold and leased back undivided ownership interests in grand gulf for the aggregate sum of $ 500 million . the initial term of the leases expired in july 2015 . system energy renewed the leases for fair market value with renewal terms expiring in july 2036 . at the end of the new lease renewal terms , system energy has the option to repurchase the leased interests in grand gulf or renew the leases at fair market value . in the event that system energy does not renew or purchase the interests , system energy would surrender such interests and their associated entitlement of grand gulf 2019s capacity and energy . system energy is required to report the sale-leaseback as a financing transaction in its financial statements . for financial reporting purposes , system energy expenses the interest portion of the lease obligation and the plant depreciation . however , operating revenues include the recovery of the lease payments because the transactions are accounted for as a sale and leaseback for ratemaking purposes . consistent with a recommendation contained in a ferc audit report , system energy initially recorded as a net regulatory asset the difference between the recovery of the lease payments and the amounts expensed for interest and depreciation and continues to record this difference as a regulatory asset or liability on an ongoing basis , resulting in a zero net balance for the regulatory asset at the end of the lease term . the amount was a net regulatory liability of $ 55.6 million and $ 55.6 million as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2016 , system energy , in connection with the grand gulf sale and leaseback transactions , had future minimum lease payments ( reflecting an implicit rate of 5.13% ( 5.13 % ) ) that are recorded as long-term debt , as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .

Table: amount ( in thousands ) 2017 $ 17188 2018 17188 2019 17188 2020 17188 2021 17188 years thereafter 257812 total 343752 less : amount representing interest 309393 present value of net minimum lease payments $ 34359

.

Question: what are the implicit interest costs for the 2018 lease payments , in thousands?
Answer: 881.7
Calculation: multiply(divide(5.13, const_100), 17188)
as of december 31 , 2006 , we also leased an office and laboratory facility in connecticut , additional office , distribution and storage facilities in san diego , and four foreign facilities located in japan , singapore , china and the netherlands under non-cancelable operating leases that expire at various times through july 2011 . these leases contain renewal options ranging from one to five years . as of december 31 , 2006 , our contractual obligations were ( in thousands ) : contractual obligation total less than 1 year 1 2013 3 years 1 2013 5 years more than 5 years .

Table: contractual obligation payments due by period total payments due by period less than 1 year payments due by period 1 2013 3 years payments due by period 1 2013 5 years payments due by period more than 5 years operating leases $ 37899 $ 5320 $ 10410 $ 9371 $ 12798 total $ 37899 $ 5320 $ 10410 $ 9371 $ 12798

the above table does not include orders for goods and services entered into in the normal course of business that are not enforceable or legally binding . item 7a . quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk . interest rate sensitivity our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to our investment portfolio . the fair market value of fixed rate securities may be adversely impacted by fluctuations in interest rates while income earned on floating rate securities may decline as a result of decreases in interest rates . under our current policies , we do not use interest rate derivative instruments to manage exposure to interest rate changes . we attempt to ensure the safety and preservation of our invested principal funds by limiting default risk , market risk and reinvestment risk . we mitigate default risk by investing in investment grade securities . we have historically maintained a relatively short average maturity for our investment portfolio , and we believe a hypothetical 100 basis point adverse move in interest rates along the entire interest rate yield curve would not materially affect the fair value of our interest sensitive financial instruments . foreign currency exchange risk although most of our revenue is realized in u.s . dollars , some portions of our revenue are realized in foreign currencies . as a result , our financial results could be affected by factors such as changes in foreign currency exchange rates or weak economic conditions in foreign markets . the functional currencies of our subsidiaries are their respective local currencies . accordingly , the accounts of these operations are translated from the local currency to the u.s . dollar using the current exchange rate in effect at the balance sheet date for the balance sheet accounts , and using the average exchange rate during the period for revenue and expense accounts . the effects of translation are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income as a separate component of stockholders 2019 equity. .

Question: what percentage of total contractual obligations are due in less than one year?
Answer: 14%
Calculation: divide(5320, 37899)
annual report on form 10-k 108 fifth third bancorp part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the information required by this item is included in the corporate information found on the inside of the back cover and in the discussion of dividend limitations that the subsidiaries can pay to the bancorp discussed in note 26 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements . additionally , as of december 31 , 2008 , the bancorp had approximately 60025 shareholders of record . issuer purchases of equity securities period shares purchased average paid per shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs maximum shares that may be purchased under the plans or programs .

Table: period sharespurchased ( a ) averagepricepaid pershare sharespurchasedas part ofpubliclyannouncedplans orprograms maximumshares thatmay bepurchasedunder theplans orprograms october 2008 25394 $ - - 19201518 november 2008 7526 - - 19201518 december 2008 40 - - 19201518 total 32960 $ - - 19201518

( a ) the bancorp repurchased 25394 , 7526 and 40 shares during october , november and december of 2008 in connection with various employee compensation plans of the bancorp . these purchases are not included against the maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the board of directors authorization. .

Question: what was the average monthly shares repurchased in the 4th quarter 2008?
Answer: 10987
Calculation: divide(add(add(7526, 25394), 40), const_3)
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2010 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock. .

Table: 12/31/2010 12/31/2011 12/31/2012 12/31/2013 12/31/2014 12/31/2015 united parcel service inc . $ 100.00 $ 103.88 $ 107.87 $ 158.07 $ 171.77 $ 160.61 standard & poor 2019s 500 index $ 100.00 $ 102.11 $ 118.43 $ 156.77 $ 178.22 $ 180.67 dow jones transportation average $ 100.00 $ 100.01 $ 107.49 $ 151.97 $ 190.08 $ 158.23

.

Question: what is the five year performance of ups class b common stock?
Answer: 60.61%
Calculation: divide(subtract(160.61, const_100), const_100)
the graph below matches cadence design systems , inc . 2019s cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index , and the nasdaq composite index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 28 , 2002 and tracks it through december 29 , 2007 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the s&p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s&p information technology index 12/29/0712/30/0612/31/051/1/051/3/0412/28/02 cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s & p information technology s & p 500 * $ 100 invested on 12/28/02 in stock or on 12/31/02 in index-including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright b7 2007 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc . all rights reserved . www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm .

Table: 12/28/02 1/3/04 1/1/05 12/31/05 12/30/06 12/29/07 cadence design systems inc . 100.00 149.92 113.38 138.92 147.04 139.82 s & p 500 100.00 128.68 142.69 149.70 173.34 182.87 nasdaq composite 100.00 149.75 164.64 168.60 187.83 205.22 s & p information technology 100.00 147.23 150.99 152.49 165.32 192.28

the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .

Question: what was the percentage cadence design systems , inc . 2019s cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock for the period ending 12/29/07?
Answer: 39.82%
Calculation: divide(subtract(139.82, const_100), const_100)
stock performance graph the following graph compares the most recent five-year performance of alcoa 2019s common stock with ( 1 ) the standard & poor 2019s 500 ae index and ( 2 ) the standard & poor 2019s 500 ae materials index , a group of 27 companies categorized by standard & poor 2019s as active in the 201cmaterials 201d market sector . such information shall not be deemed to be 201cfiled . 201d five-year cumulative total return based upon an initial investment of $ 100 on december 31 , 2010 with dividends reinvested alcoa inc . s&p 500 ae index s&p 500 ae materials index dec-'10 dec-'11 dec-'12 dec-'14 dec-'15dec-'13 .

Table: as of december 31, 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 alcoainc . $ 100 $ 57 $ 58 $ 72 $ 107 $ 68 s&p 500 aeindex 100 102 118 157 178 181 s&p 500 aematerials index 100 90 104 130 139 128

s&p 500 ae index 100 102 118 157 178 181 s&p 500 ae materials index 100 90 104 130 139 128 copyright a9 2016 standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . source : research data group , inc . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm ) .

Question: what was the percentual increase observed in the alcoainc . investment during 2013 and 2014?
Answer: 48.6%
Calculation: subtract(divide(107, 72), const_1)
Explanation: it is the price in 2014 ( $ 107 ) divided by the price in 2013 ( $ 72 ) then subtracted 1 and turned into a percentage .