bevaya/FinQA huggingface dataset:
"three factor formula" ) . the consolidated financial statements include northrop grumman management and support services allocations totaling $ 32 million for the year ended december 31 , 2011 . shared services and infrastructure costs - this category includes costs for functions such as information technology support , systems maintenance , telecommunications , procurement and other shared services while hii was a subsidiary of northrop grumman . these costs were generally allocated to the company using the three factor formula or based on usage . the consolidated financial statements reflect shared services and infrastructure costs allocations totaling $ 80 million for the year ended december 31 , 2011 . northrop grumman-provided benefits - this category includes costs for group medical , dental and vision insurance , 401 ( k ) savings plan , pension and postretirement benefits , incentive compensation and other benefits . these costs were generally allocated to the company based on specific identification of the benefits provided to company employees participating in these benefit plans . the consolidated financial statements include northrop grumman- provided benefits allocations totaling $ 169 million for the year ended december 31 , 2011 . management believes that the methods of allocating these costs are reasonable , consistent with past practices , and in conformity with cost allocation requirements of cas or the far . related party sales and cost of sales prior to the spin-off , hii purchased and sold certain products and services from and to other northrop grumman entities . purchases of products and services from these affiliated entities , which were recorded at cost , were $ 44 million for the year ended december 31 , 2011 . sales of products and services to these entities were $ 1 million for the year ended december 31 , 2011 . former parent's equity in unit transactions between hii and northrop grumman prior to the spin-off have been included in the consolidated financial statements and were effectively settled for cash at the time the transaction was recorded . the net effect of the settlement of these transactions is reflected as former parent's equity in unit in the consolidated statement of changes in equity . 21 . unaudited selected quarterly data unaudited quarterly financial results for the years ended december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , are set forth in the following tables: .

Table: ( $ in millions except per share amounts ) year ended december 31 2013 1st qtr year ended december 31 2013 2nd qtr year ended december 31 2013 3rd qtr year ended december 31 2013 4th qtr sales and service revenues $ 1562 $ 1683 $ 1637 $ 1938 operating income ( loss ) 95 116 127 174 earnings ( loss ) before income taxes 65 87 99 143 net earnings ( loss ) 44 57 69 91 dividends declared per share $ 0.10 $ 0.10 $ 0.10 $ 0.20 basic earnings ( loss ) per share $ 0.88 $ 1.14 $ 1.38 $ 1.86 diluted earnings ( loss ) per share $ 0.87 $ 1.12 $ 1.36 $ 1.82

.

Question: what is the total dividend per share declared in 2013?
Answer: 0.50
Calculation: add(add(add(0.10, 0.10), 0.10), add(0.10, 0.10))
table of contents performance graph the following performance graph shows the cumulative total return to a holder of the company 2019s common stock , assuming dividend reinvestment , compared with the cumulative total return , assuming dividend reinvestment , of the standard & poor ( "s&p" ) 500 index and the dow jones us financials index during the period from december 31 , 2010 through december 31 , 2015. .

Table: 12/10 12/11 12/12 12/13 12/14 12/15 e*trade financial corporation 100.00 49.75 55.94 122.75 151.59 185.25 s&p 500 index 100.00 102.11 118.45 156.82 178.29 180.75 dow jones us financials index 100.00 87.16 110.56 148.39 170.04 170.19

.

Question: what was the difference in percentage cumulative total return for e*trade financial corporation and the s&p 500 index for the five years ended 12/15?
Answer: 4.5%
Calculation: subtract(divide(subtract(185.25, const_100), const_100), divide(subtract(180.75, const_100), const_100))
the hartford financial services group , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 5 . investments and derivative instruments ( continued ) collateral arrangements the company enters into various collateral arrangements in connection with its derivative instruments , which require both the pledging and accepting of collateral . as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , collateral pledged having a fair value of $ 1.1 billion and $ 790 , respectively , was included in fixed maturities , afs , in the consolidated balance sheets . from time to time , the company enters into secured borrowing arrangements as a means to increase net investment income . the company received cash collateral of $ 33 as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 . the following table presents the classification and carrying amount of loaned securities and derivative instruments collateral pledged. .

Table: december 31 2011 december 31 2010 fixed maturities afs $ 1086 $ 823 short-term investments 199 2014 total collateral pledged $ 1285 $ 823

as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , the company had accepted collateral with a fair value of $ 2.6 billion and $ 1.5 billion , respectively , of which $ 2.0 billion and $ 1.1 billion , respectively , was cash collateral which was invested and recorded in the consolidated balance sheets in fixed maturities and short-term investments with corresponding amounts recorded in other assets and other liabilities . the company is only permitted by contract to sell or repledge the noncash collateral in the event of a default by the counterparty . as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , noncash collateral accepted was held in separate custodial accounts and was not included in the company 2019s consolidated balance sheets . securities on deposit with states the company is required by law to deposit securities with government agencies in states where it conducts business . as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , the fair value of securities on deposit was approximately $ 1.6 billion and $ 1.4 billion , respectively. .

Question: what is the change in value of fixed maturities afs from 2010 to 2011 , ( in billions ) ?
Answer: 263
Calculation: subtract(1086, 823)
performance graph the following graph compares the yearly change in the cumulative total stockholder return for our last five full fiscal years , based upon the market price of our common stock , with the cumulative total return on a nasdaq composite index ( u.s . companies ) and a peer group , the nasdaq medical equipment-sic code 3840-3849 index , which is comprised of medical equipment companies , for that period . the performance graph assumes the investment of $ 100 on march 31 , 2006 in our common stock , the nasdaq composite index ( u.s . companies ) and the peer group index , and the reinvestment of any and all dividends. .

Table: 3/31/2006 3/31/2007 3/31/2008 3/31/2009 3/31/2010 3/31/2011 abiomed inc 100 105.89 101.86 37.98 80.00 112.64 nasdaq composite index 100 103.50 97.41 65.33 102.49 118.86 nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849 100 88.78 84.26 46.12 83.47 91.35

this graph is not 201csoliciting material 201d under regulation 14a or 14c of the rules promulgated under the securities exchange act of 1934 , is not deemed filed with the securities and exchange commission and is not to be incorporated by reference in any of our filings under the securities act of 1933 , as amended , or the exchange act whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any such filing . transfer agent american stock transfer & trust company , 59 maiden lane , new york , ny 10038 , is our stock transfer agent. .

Question: did abiomed inc , outperform the nasdaq medical equipment index?\\n
Answer: yes
Calculation: greater(112.64, 91.35)
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities . price range our common stock trades on the nasdaq global select market under the symbol 201cmktx 201d . the range of closing price information for our common stock , as reported by nasdaq , was as follows : on february 20 , 2015 , the last reported closing price of our common stock on the nasdaq global select market was $ 78.97 . holders there were 28 holders of record of our common stock as of february 20 , 2015 . dividend policy during 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , we paid quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.16 per share , $ 0.13 per share and $ 0.11 per share , respectively . on december 27 , 2012 , we paid a special cash dividend of $ 1.30 per share . in january 2015 , our board of directors approved a quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.20 per share payable on february 26 , 2015 to stockholders of record as of the close of business on february 12 , 2015 . any future declaration and payment of dividends will be at the sole discretion of our board of directors . the board of directors may take into account such matters as general business conditions , our financial results , capital requirements , contractual obligations , legal and regulatory restrictions on the payment of dividends to our stockholders or by our subsidiaries to their respective parent entities , and such other factors as the board of directors may deem relevant . recent sales of unregistered securities securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans please see the section entitled 201cequity compensation plan information 201d in item 12. .

Table: 2014: high low january 1 2014 to march 31 2014 $ 67.16 $ 57.99 april 1 2014 to june 30 2014 $ 59.65 $ 50.30 july 1 2014 to september 30 2014 $ 62.05 $ 47.50 october 1 2014 to december 31 2014 $ 73.25 $ 61.15 2013: high low january 1 2013 to march 31 2013 $ 41.85 $ 34.79 april 1 2013 to june 30 2013 $ 47.80 $ 37.09 july 1 2013 to september 30 2013 $ 61.47 $ 47.59 october 1 2013 to december 31 2013 $ 70.60 $ 61.34

.

Question: by how much did the high of mktx stock increase from april 12 , 2014 to march 31 , 2014?
Answer: 12.6%
Calculation: divide(subtract(67.16, 59.65), 59.65)
stock performance graph the following line-graph presentation compares our cumulative shareholder returns with the standard & poor 2019s information technology index and the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index for the past five years . the line graph assumes the investment of $ 100 in our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s information technology index , and the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index on may 31 , 2003 and assumes reinvestment of all dividends . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among global payments inc. , the s&p 500 index and the s&p information technology index 5/03 5/04 5/05 5/06 5/07 5/08 global payments inc . s&p 500 s&p information technology * $ 100 invested on 5/31/03 in stock or index-including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending may 31 . global payments s&p 500 information technology .

Table: global payments s&p 500 s&p information technology may 31 2003 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 may 31 2004 137.75 118.33 121.98 may 31 2005 205.20 128.07 123.08 may 31 2006 276.37 139.14 123.99 may 31 2007 238.04 170.85 152.54 may 31 2008 281.27 159.41 156.43

issuer purchases of equity securities in fiscal 2007 , our board of directors approved a share repurchase program that authorized the purchase of up to $ 100 million of global payments 2019 stock in the open market or as otherwise may be determined by us , subject to market conditions , business opportunities , and other factors . under this authorization , we have repurchased 2.3 million shares of our common stock . this authorization has no expiration date and may be suspended or terminated at any time . repurchased shares will be retired but will be available for future issuance. .

Question: what is the roi of global payments from 2003 to 2004?
Answer: 37.8%
Calculation: divide(subtract(137.75, const_100), const_100)
table of contents other areas in which we do business . depending on the scope of such regulation , certain of our facilities and operations , or the operations of our suppliers , may be subject to additional operating and other permit requirements , potentially resulting in increased operating costs . future regulatory developments future regulatory developments and actions could affect operations and increase operating costs for the airline industry , including our airline subsidiaries . see part i , item 1a . risk factors 2013 201cif we are unable to obtain and maintain adequate facilities and infrastructure throughout our system and , at some airports , adequate slots , we may be unable to operate our existing flight schedule and to expand or change our route network in the future , which may have a material adverse impact on our operations , 201d 201cour business is subject to extensive government regulation , which may result in increases in our costs , disruptions to our operations , limits on our operating flexibility , reductions in the demand for air travel , and competitive disadvantages 201d and 201cwe are subject to many forms of environmental regulation and may incur substantial costs as a result 201d for additional information . employees and labor relations the airline business is labor intensive . in 2015 , salaries , wages and benefits were our largest expenses and represented approximately 31% ( 31 % ) of our operating expenses . the table below presents our approximate number of active full-time equivalent employees as of december 31 , 2015 . mainline operations wholly-owned regional carriers total .

Table: mainline operations wholly-owned regional carriers total pilots and flight crew training instructors 13100 3200 16300 flight attendants 24100 1900 26000 maintenance personnel 14400 1800 16200 fleet service personnel 16100 3200 19300 passenger service personnel 16500 7100 23600 administrative and other 14700 2400 17100 total 98900 19600 118500

.

Question: what is the ratio of passenger service personnel to the flight attendants
Answer: 0.91
Calculation: divide(23600, 26000)
Explanation: for every flight attendant there is 0.91 passenger service personnel
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities our class a common stock trades on the new york stock exchange under the symbol 201cma 201d . at february 8 , 2019 , we had 73 stockholders of record for our class a common stock . we believe that the number of beneficial owners is substantially greater than the number of record holders because a large portion of our class a common stock is held in 201cstreet name 201d by brokers . there is currently no established public trading market for our class b common stock . there were approximately 287 holders of record of our non-voting class b common stock as of february 8 , 2019 , constituting approximately 1.1% ( 1.1 % ) of our total outstanding equity . stock performance graph the graph and table below compare the cumulative total stockholder return of mastercard 2019s class a common stock , the s&p 500 financials and the s&p 500 index for the five-year period ended december 31 , 2018 . the graph assumes a $ 100 investment in our class a common stock and both of the indices and the reinvestment of dividends . mastercard 2019s class b common stock is not publicly traded or listed on any exchange or dealer quotation system . total returns to stockholders for each of the years presented were as follows : indexed returns base period for the years ended december 31 .

Table: company/index base period 2013 base period 2014 base period 2015 base period 2016 base period 2017 2018 mastercard $ 100.00 $ 103.73 $ 118.05 $ 126.20 $ 186.37 $ 233.56 s&p 500 financials 100.00 115.20 113.44 139.31 170.21 148.03 s&p 500 index 100.00 113.69 115.26 129.05 157.22 150.33

.

Question: what was the percent of the growth of the mastercard from 2013 to 2014
Answer: 3.73%
Calculation: divide(subtract(103.73, const_100), const_100)
schlumberger limited and subsidiaries shares of common stock ( stated in millions ) issued in treasury shares outstanding .

Table: issued in treasury shares outstanding balance january 1 2009 1334 -140 ( 140 ) 1194 shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged 2013 4 4 vesting of restricted stock 2013 1 1 shares issued under employee stock purchase plan 2013 4 4 stock repurchase program 2013 -8 ( 8 ) -8 ( 8 ) balance december 31 2009 1334 -139 ( 139 ) 1195 acquisition of smith international inc . 100 76 176 shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged 2013 6 6 shares issued under employee stock purchase plan 2013 3 3 stock repurchase program 2013 -27 ( 27 ) -27 ( 27 ) issued on conversions of debentures 2013 8 8 balance december 31 2010 1434 -73 ( 73 ) 1361 shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged 2013 6 6 vesting of restricted stock 2013 1 1 shares issued under employee stock purchase plan 2013 3 3 stock repurchase program 2013 -37 ( 37 ) -37 ( 37 ) balance december 31 2011 1434 -100 ( 100 ) 1334

see the notes to consolidated financial statements .

Question: what was the total of shares ( millions ) issued to employees in the 3 year period?
Answer: 26
Calculation: add(add(add(add(add(4, 4), 6), 3), 6), 3)
packaging corporation of america notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) december 31 , 2005 9 . shareholders 2019 equity ( continued ) stockholder received proceeds , net of the underwriting discount , of $ 20.69 per share . the company did not sell any shares in , or receive any proceeds from , the secondary offering . concurrent with the closing of the secondary offering on december 21 , 2005 , the company entered into a common stock repurchase agreement with pca holdings llc . pursuant to the repurchase agreement , the company purchased 4500000 shares of common stock directly from pca holdings llc at the initial price to the public net of the underwriting discount or $ 20.69 per share , the same net price per share received by pca holdings llc in the secondary offering . these shares were retired on december 21 , 2005 . 10 . commitments and contingencies capital commitments the company had authorized capital expenditures of approximately $ 33.1 million and $ 55.2 million as of december 31 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively , in connection with the expansion and replacement of existing facilities and equipment . operating leases pca leases space for certain of its facilities and cutting rights to approximately 108000 acres of timberland under long-term leases . the company also leases equipment , primarily vehicles and rolling stock , and other assets under long-term leases of a duration generally of three years . the minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases with lease terms in excess of one year are as follows : ( in thousands ) .

Table: 2006 $ 24569 2007 21086 2008 14716 2009 9801 2010 6670 thereafter 37130 total $ 113972

capital lease obligations were not significant to the accompanying financial statements . total lease expense , including base rent on all leases and executory costs , such as insurance , taxes , and maintenance , for the years ended december 31 , 2005 , 2004 and 2003 was $ 35.8 million , $ 33.0 million and $ 31.6 million , respectively . these costs are included in cost of goods sold and selling and administrative expenses. .

Question: what was the percentage change in total lease expense , including base rent on all leases and executory costs , such as insurance , taxes , and maintenance from 2004 to 2005?
Answer: 8%
Calculation: divide(subtract(35.8, 33.0), 33.0)
a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits , for the periods indicated , is as follows: .

Table: ( dollars in thousands ) 2010 2009 2008 balance at january 1 $ 29010 $ 34366 $ 29132 additions based on tax positions related to the current year 7119 6997 5234 additions for tax positions of prior years - - - reductions for tax positions of prior years - - - settlements with taxing authorities -12356 ( 12356 ) -12353 ( 12353 ) - lapses of applicable statutes of limitations - - - balance at december 31 $ 23773 $ 29010 $ 34366

the entire amount of the unrecognized tax benefits would affect the effective tax rate if recognized . in 2010 , the company favorably settled a 2003 and 2004 irs audit . the company recorded a net overall tax benefit including accrued interest of $ 25920 thousand . in addition , the company was also able to take down a $ 12356 thousand fin 48 reserve that had been established regarding the 2003 and 2004 irs audit . the company is no longer subject to u.s . federal , state and local or foreign income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2007 . the company recognizes accrued interest related to net unrecognized tax benefits and penalties in income taxes . during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , the company accrued and recognized a net expense ( benefit ) of approximately $ ( 9938 ) thousand , $ 1563 thousand and $ 2446 thousand , respectively , in interest and penalties . included within the 2010 net expense ( benefit ) of $ ( 9938 ) thousand is $ ( 10591 ) thousand of accrued interest related to the 2003 and 2004 irs audit . the company is not aware of any positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly increase or decrease within twelve months of the reporting date . for u.s . income tax purposes the company has foreign tax credit carryforwards of $ 55026 thousand that begin to expire in 2014 . in addition , for u.s . income tax purposes the company has $ 41693 thousand of alternative minimum tax credits that do not expire . management believes that it is more likely than not that the company will realize the benefits of its net deferred tax assets and , accordingly , no valuation allowance has been recorded for the periods presented . tax benefits of $ 629 thousand and $ 1714 thousand related to share-based compensation deductions for stock options exercised in 2010 and 2009 , respectively , are included within additional paid-in capital of the shareholders 2019 equity section of the consolidated balance sheets. .

Question: what is the percent change of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits in 2009?
Answer: -16%
Calculation: divide(subtract(29010, 34366), 34366)
item 2 : properties information concerning applied 2019s properties is set forth below: .

Table: ( square feet in thousands ) united states other countries total owned 3964 1652 5616 leased 845 1153 1998 total 4809 2805 7614

because of the interrelation of applied 2019s operations , properties within a country may be shared by the segments operating within that country . the company 2019s headquarters offices are in santa clara , california . products in semiconductor systems are manufactured in santa clara , california ; austin , texas ; gloucester , massachusetts ; kalispell , montana ; rehovot , israel ; and singapore . remanufactured equipment products in the applied global services segment are produced primarily in austin , texas . products in the display and adjacent markets segment are manufactured in alzenau , germany ; and tainan , taiwan . other products are manufactured in treviso , italy . applied also owns and leases offices , plants and warehouse locations in many locations throughout the world , including in europe , japan , north america ( principally the united states ) , israel , china , india , korea , southeast asia and taiwan . these facilities are principally used for manufacturing ; research , development and engineering ; and marketing , sales and customer support . applied also owns a total of approximately 269 acres of buildable land in montana , texas , california , israel and italy that could accommodate additional building space . applied considers the properties that it owns or leases as adequate to meet its current and future requirements . applied regularly assesses the size , capability and location of its global infrastructure and periodically makes adjustments based on these assessments. .

Question: what portion of the company's property is located in united states?
Answer: 73.8%
Calculation: divide(5616, 7614)