bevaya/FinQA huggingface dataset:
12 . brokerage receivables and brokerage payables citi has receivables and payables for financial instruments sold to and purchased from brokers , dealers and customers , which arise in the ordinary course of business . citi is exposed to risk of loss from the inability of brokers , dealers or customers to pay for purchases or to deliver the financial instruments sold , in which case citi would have to sell or purchase the financial instruments at prevailing market prices . credit risk is reduced to the extent that an exchange or clearing organization acts as a counterparty to the transaction and replaces the broker , dealer or customer in question . citi seeks to protect itself from the risks associated with customer activities by requiring customers to maintain margin collateral in compliance with regulatory and internal guidelines . margin levels are monitored daily , and customers deposit additional collateral as required . where customers cannot meet collateral requirements , citi may liquidate sufficient underlying financial instruments to bring the customer into compliance with the required margin level . exposure to credit risk is impacted by market volatility , which may impair the ability of clients to satisfy their obligations to citi . credit limits are established and closely monitored for customers and for brokers and dealers engaged in forwards , futures and other transactions deemed to be credit sensitive . brokerage receivables and brokerage payables consisted of the following: .

Table: in millions of dollars december 31 , 2016 december 31 , 2015 receivables from customers $ 10374 $ 10435 receivables from brokers dealers and clearing organizations 18513 17248 total brokerage receivables ( 1 ) $ 28887 $ 27683 payables to customers $ 37237 $ 35653 payables to brokers dealers and clearing organizations 19915 18069 total brokerage payables ( 1 ) $ 57152 $ 53722

payables to brokers , dealers , and clearing organizations 19915 18069 total brokerage payables ( 1 ) $ 57152 $ 53722 ( 1 ) includes brokerage receivables and payables recorded by citi broker- dealer entities that are accounted for in accordance with the aicpa accounting guide for brokers and dealers in securities as codified in asc 940-320. .

Question: what was the ratio of the total brokerage payable to the total brokerage receivables in 2016
Answer: 1.98
Calculation: divide(57152, 28887)
Explanation: in 2016 there was $ 1.98 of total brokerage payables per $ 1 of total brokerage receivables
the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2010 , 2009 , and 2008 ( 3 ) multilateral loans include loans funded and guaranteed by bilaterals , multilaterals , development banks and other similar institutions . ( 4 ) non-recourse debt of $ 708 million as of december 31 , 2009 was excluded from non-recourse debt and included in current and long-term liabilities of held for sale and discontinued businesses in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . non-recourse debt as of december 31 , 2010 is scheduled to reach maturity as set forth in the table below : december 31 , annual maturities ( in millions ) .

Table: december 31, annual maturities ( in millions ) 2011 $ 2577 2012 657 2013 953 2014 1839 2015 1138 thereafter 7957 total non-recourse debt $ 15121

as of december 31 , 2010 , aes subsidiaries with facilities under construction had a total of approximately $ 432 million of committed but unused credit facilities available to fund construction and other related costs . excluding these facilities under construction , aes subsidiaries had approximately $ 893 million in a number of available but unused committed revolving credit lines to support their working capital , debt service reserves and other business needs . these credit lines can be used in one or more of the following ways : solely for borrowings ; solely for letters of credit ; or a combination of these uses . the weighted average interest rate on borrowings from these facilities was 3.24% ( 3.24 % ) at december 31 , 2010 . non-recourse debt covenants , restrictions and defaults the terms of the company 2019s non-recourse debt include certain financial and non-financial covenants . these covenants are limited to subsidiary activity and vary among the subsidiaries . these covenants may include but are not limited to maintenance of certain reserves , minimum levels of working capital and limitations on incurring additional indebtedness . compliance with certain covenants may not be objectively determinable . as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , approximately $ 803 million and $ 653 million , respectively , of restricted cash was maintained in accordance with certain covenants of the non-recourse debt agreements , and these amounts were included within 201crestricted cash 201d and 201cdebt service reserves and other deposits 201d in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . various lender and governmental provisions restrict the ability of certain of the company 2019s subsidiaries to transfer their net assets to the parent company . such restricted net assets of subsidiaries amounted to approximately $ 5.4 billion at december 31 , 2010. .

Question: what percentage of total non-recourse debt as of december 31 , 2010 is due in 2012?
Answer: 4%
Calculation: divide(657, 15121)
course of business , we actively manage our exposure to these market risks by entering into various hedging transactions , authorized under established policies that place clear controls on these activities . the counterparties in these transactions are generally highly rated institutions . we establish credit limits for each counterparty . our hedging transactions include but are not limited to a variety of derivative financial instruments . for information on interest rate , foreign exchange , commodity price , and equity instrument risk , please see note 7 to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report . value at risk the estimates in the table below are intended to measure the maximum potential fair value we could lose in one day from adverse changes in market interest rates , foreign exchange rates , commodity prices , and equity prices under normal market conditions . a monte carlo value-at-risk ( var ) methodology was used to quantify the market risk for our exposures . the models assumed normal market conditions and used a 95 percent confidence level . the var calculation used historical interest and foreign exchange rates , and commodity and equity prices from the past year to estimate the potential volatility and correlation of these rates in the future . the market data were drawn from the riskmetrics 2122 data set . the calculations are not intended to represent actual losses in fair value that we expect to incur . further , since the hedging instrument ( the derivative ) inversely correlates with the underlying exposure , we would expect that any loss or gain in the fair value of our derivatives would be generally offset by an increase or decrease in the fair value of the underlying exposure . the positions included in the calculations were : debt ; investments ; interest rate swaps ; foreign exchange forwards ; commodity swaps , futures , and options ; and equity instruments . the calculations do not include the underlying foreign exchange and commodities or equity-related positions that are offset by these market-risk-sensitive instruments . the table below presents the estimated maximum potential var arising from a one-day loss in fair value for our interest rate , foreign currency , commodity , and equity market-risk-sensitive instruments outstanding as of may 27 , 2018 and may 28 , 2017 , and the average fair value impact during the year ended may 27 , 2018. .

Table: in millions fair value impact may 27 2018 fair value impact averageduringfiscal 2018 fair value impact may 282017 interest rate instruments $ 33.2 $ 27.5 $ 25.1 foreign currency instruments 21.3 23.1 24.6 commodity instruments 1.9 2.1 3.2 equity instruments 2.0 1.4 1.3

.

Question: what is the total fair value impact for all instruments as of may 27 , 2018?
Answer: 58.4
Calculation: add(add(add(33.2, 21.3), 1.9), 2.0)
stock performance graph : the graph below shows the cumulative total shareholder return assuming the investment of $ 100 , on december 31 , 2013 , and the reinvestment of dividends thereafter , if any , in the company 2019s common stock versus the standard and poor 2019s s&p 500 retail index ( 201cs&p 500 retail index 201d ) and the standard and poor 2019s s&p 500 index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) . .

Table: company/index december 31 , 2013 december 31 , 2014 december 31 , 2015 december 31 , 2016 december 31 , 2017 december 31 , 2018 o 2019reilly automotive inc . $ 100 $ 150 $ 197 $ 216 $ 187 $ 268 s&p 500 retail index 100 110 137 143 184 208 s&p 500 $ 100 $ 111 $ 111 $ 121 $ 145 $ 136

.

Question: what is the roi of an investment in s&p500 from 2013 to 2017?
Answer: 45%
Calculation: divide(subtract(145, 100), 100)
equity compensation plan information the following table presents the equity securities available for issuance under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2018 . equity compensation plan information plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options , warrants and rights ( 1 ) weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options , warrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 399165 $ 0.00 3995600 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 2 ) 2014 2014 2014 .

Table: plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights ( 1 ) ( a ) ( b ) weighted-average exercise price of outstanding optionswarrants and rights number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securitiesreflected in column ( a ) ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 399165 $ 0.00 3995600 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders ( 2 ) 2014 2014 2014 total 399165 $ 0.00 3995600

( 1 ) includes grants made under the huntington ingalls industries , inc . 2012 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2012 plan" ) , which was approved by our stockholders on may 2 , 2012 , and the huntington ingalls industries , inc . 2011 long-term incentive stock plan ( the "2011 plan" ) , which was approved by the sole stockholder of hii prior to its spin-off from northrop grumman corporation . of these shares , 27123 were stock rights granted under the 2011 plan . in addition , this number includes 31697 stock rights , 5051 restricted stock rights , and 335293 restricted performance stock rights granted under the 2012 plan , assuming target performance achievement . ( 2 ) there are no awards made under plans not approved by security holders . item 13 . certain relationships and related transactions , and director independence information as to certain relationships and related transactions and director independence will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2019 annual meeting of stockholders , to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year . item 14 . principal accountant fees and services information as to principal accountant fees and services will be incorporated herein by reference to the proxy statement for our 2019 annual meeting of stockholders , to be filed within 120 days after the end of the company 2019s fiscal year. .

Question: as of december 312018 what was the total number of number of securities of the equity compensation plans approved by security holders
Answer: 4394765
Calculation: add(399165, 3995600)
underlying physical transaction occurs . we have not qualified commodity derivative instruments used in our osm or rm&t segments for hedge accounting . as a result , we recognize in net income all changes in the fair value of derivative instruments used in those operations . open commodity derivative positions as of december 31 , 2008 and sensitivity analysis at december 31 , 2008 , our e&p segment held open derivative contracts to mitigate the price risk on natural gas held in storage or purchased to be marketed with our own natural gas production in amounts that were in line with normal levels of activity . at december 31 , 2008 , we had no significant open derivative contracts related to our future sales of liquid hydrocarbons and natural gas and therefore remained substantially exposed to market prices of these commodities . the osm segment holds crude oil options which were purchased by western for a three year period ( january 2007 to december 2009 ) . the premiums for the purchased put options had been partially offset through the sale of call options for the same three-year period , resulting in a net premium liability . payment of the net premium liability is deferred until the settlement of the option contracts . as of december 31 , 2008 , the following put and call options were outstanding: .

Table: option expiration date 2009 option contract volumes ( barrels per day ) : put options purchased 20000 call options sold 15000 average exercise price ( dollars per barrel ) : put options $ 50.50 call options $ 90.50

in the first quarter of 2009 , we sold derivative instruments at an average exercise price of $ 50.50 which effectively offset the open put options for the remainder of 2009 . at december 31 , 2008 , the number of open derivative contracts held by our rm&t segment was lower than in previous periods . starting in the second quarter of 2008 , we decreased our use of derivatives to mitigate crude oil price risk between the time that domestic spot crude oil purchases are priced and when they are actually refined into salable petroleum products . instead , we are addressing this price risk through other means , including changes in contractual terms and crude oil acquisition practices . additionally , in previous periods , certain contracts in our rm&t segment for the purchase or sale of commodities were not qualified or designated as normal purchase or normal sales under generally accepted accounting principles and therefore were accounted for as derivative instruments . during the second quarter of 2008 , as we decreased our use of derivatives , we began to designate such contracts for the normal purchase and normal sale exclusion. .

Question: for option expiration dates in 2009 , what was the average option contract volumes ( barrels per day ) for put options purchased and \\ncall options sold?
Answer: 17500
Calculation: divide(add(20000, 15000), const_2)
devon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) debt maturities as of december 31 , 2013 , excluding premiums and discounts , are as follows ( in millions ) : .

Table: 2014 $ 4067 2015 2014 2016 500 2017 750 2018 125 2019 and thereafter 6600 total $ 12042

credit lines devon has a $ 3.0 billion syndicated , unsecured revolving line of credit ( the 201csenior credit facility 201d ) that matures on october 24 , 2018 . however , prior to the maturity date , devon has the option to extend the maturity for up to one additional one-year period , subject to the approval of the lenders . amounts borrowed under the senior credit facility may , at the election of devon , bear interest at various fixed rate options for periods of up to twelve months . such rates are generally less than the prime rate . however , devon may elect to borrow at the prime rate . the senior credit facility currently provides for an annual facility fee of $ 3.8 million that is payable quarterly in arrears . as of december 31 , 2013 , there were no borrowings under the senior credit facility . the senior credit facility contains only one material financial covenant . this covenant requires devon 2019s ratio of total funded debt to total capitalization , as defined in the credit agreement , to be no greater than 65 percent . the credit agreement contains definitions of total funded debt and total capitalization that include adjustments to the respective amounts reported in the accompanying financial statements . also , total capitalization is adjusted to add back noncash financial write-downs such as full cost ceiling impairments or goodwill impairments . as of december 31 , 2013 , devon was in compliance with this covenant with a debt-to- capitalization ratio of 25.7 percent . commercial paper devon has access to $ 3.0 billion of short-term credit under its commercial paper program . commercial paper debt generally has a maturity of between 1 and 90 days , although it can have a maturity of up to 365 days , and bears interest at rates agreed to at the time of the borrowing . the interest rate is generally based on a standard index such as the federal funds rate , libor , or the money market rate as found in the commercial paper market . as of december 31 , 2013 , devon 2019s weighted average borrowing rate on its commercial paper borrowings was 0.30 percent . other debentures and notes following are descriptions of the various other debentures and notes outstanding at december 31 , 2013 , as listed in the table presented at the beginning of this note . geosouthern debt in december 2013 , in conjunction with the planned geosouthern acquisition , devon issued $ 2.25 billion aggregate principal amount of fixed and floating rate senior notes resulting in cash proceeds of approximately .

Question: as of december 31 , 2013 what was the percent of the devons debt maturities due in 2014
Answer: 33.8%
Calculation: divide(4067, 12042)
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2002 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and the class b common stock of united parcel service , inc . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 $ 180.00 $ 200.00 $ 220.00 2002 20072006200520042003 s&p 500 ups dj transport .

Table: 12/31/02 12/31/03 12/31/04 12/31/05 12/31/06 12/31/07 united parcel service inc . $ 100.00 $ 119.89 $ 139.55 $ 124.88 $ 127.08 $ 122.64 s&p 500 index $ 100.00 $ 128.68 $ 142.68 $ 149.69 $ 173.33 $ 182.85 dow jones transportation average $ 100.00 $ 131.84 $ 168.39 $ 188.00 $ 206.46 $ 209.40

securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans the following table provides information as of december 31 , 2007 regarding compensation plans under which our class a common stock is authorized for issuance . these plans do not authorize the issuance of our class b common stock. .

Question: what was the percentage five year cumulative total return for united parcel service inc . for the period ended 12/31/07?
Answer: 22.64%
Calculation: divide(subtract(122.64, const_100), const_100)
( 1 ) includes shares repurchased through our publicly announced share repurchase program and shares tendered to pay the exercise price and tax withholding on employee stock options . shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2004 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 2004 20092008200720062005 s&p 500 ups dj transport .

Table: 12/31/04 12/31/05 12/31/06 12/31/07 12/31/08 12/31/09 united parcel service inc . $ 100.00 $ 89.49 $ 91.06 $ 87.88 $ 70.48 $ 75.95 s&p 500 index $ 100.00 $ 104.91 $ 121.48 $ 128.15 $ 80.74 $ 102.11 dow jones transportation average $ 100.00 $ 111.65 $ 122.61 $ 124.35 $ 97.72 $ 115.88

.

Question: what was the difference in percentage cumulative return on investment for united parcel service inc . compared to the s&p 500 index for the five year period ended 12/31/09?
Answer: -26.16%
Calculation: subtract(divide(subtract(75.95, const_100), const_100), divide(subtract(102.11, const_100), const_100))