bevaya/FinQA huggingface dataset:
cdw corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements holders of class b common units in connection with the distribution is subject to any vesting provisions previously applicable to the holder 2019s class b common units . class b common unit holders received 3798508 shares of restricted stock with respect to class b common units that had not yet vested at the time of the distribution . for the year ended december 31 , 2013 , 1200544 shares of such restricted stock vested/settled and 5931 shares were forfeited . as of december 31 , 2013 , 2592033 shares of restricted stock were outstanding . stock options in addition , in connection with the ipo , the company issued 1268986 stock options to the class b common unit holders to preserve their fully diluted equity ownership percentage . these options were issued with a per-share exercise price equal to the ipo price of $ 17.00 and are also subject to the same vesting provisions as the class b common units to which they relate . the company also granted 19412 stock options under the 2013 ltip during the year ended december 31 , 2013 . restricted stock units ( 201crsus 201d ) in connection with the ipo , the company granted 1416543 rsus under the 2013 ltip at a weighted- average grant-date fair value of $ 17.03 per unit . the rsus cliff-vest at the end of four years . valuation information the company attributes the value of equity-based compensation awards to the various periods during which the recipient must perform services in order to vest in the award using the straight-line method . post-ipo equity awards the company has elected to use the black-scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value of stock options granted . the black-scholes option pricing model incorporates various assumptions including volatility , expected term , risk-free interest rates and dividend yields . the assumptions used to value the stock options granted during the year ended december 31 , 2013 are presented below . year ended december 31 , assumptions 2013 .

Table: assumptions year ended december 31 2013 weighted-average grant date fair value $ 4.75 weighted-average volatility ( 1 ) 35.00% ( 35.00 % ) weighted-average risk-free rate ( 2 ) 1.58% ( 1.58 % ) dividend yield 1.00% ( 1.00 % ) expected term ( in years ) ( 3 ) 5.4

expected term ( in years ) ( 3 ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.4 ( 1 ) based upon an assessment of the two-year , five-year and implied volatility for the company 2019s selected peer group , adjusted for the company 2019s leverage . ( 2 ) based on a composite u.s . treasury rate . ( 3 ) the expected term is calculated using the simplified method . the simplified method defines the expected term as the average of the option 2019s contractual term and the option 2019s weighted-average vesting period . the company utilizes this method as it has limited historical stock option data that is sufficient to derive a reasonable estimate of the expected stock option term. .

Question: was the weighted-average risk-free rate greater than the dividend yield?
Answer: yes
Calculation: greater(1.58, const_1)
table of contents company stock performance the following graph shows a comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index for the five years ended september 26 , 2015 . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index as of the market close on september 24 , 2010 . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . * $ 100 invested on 9/25/10 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . data points are the last day of each fiscal year for the company 2019scommon stock and september 30th for indexes . copyright a9 2015 s&p , a division of mcgraw hill financial . all rights reserved . copyright a9 2015 dow jones & co . all rights reserved . september september september september september september .

Table: september 2010 september 2011 september 2012 september 2013 september 2014 september 2015 apple inc . $ 100 $ 138 $ 229 $ 170 $ 254 $ 294 s&p 500 index $ 100 $ 101 $ 132 $ 157 $ 188 $ 187 s&p information technology index $ 100 $ 104 $ 137 $ 147 $ 190 $ 194 dow jones u.s . technology supersector index $ 100 $ 103 $ 134 $ 141 $ 183 $ 183

apple inc . | 2015 form 10-k | 21 .

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return for the four years ended 2014?
Answer: 154%
Calculation: divide(subtract(254, 100), 100)
stock performance graph comcast the graph below compares the yearly percentage change in the cumulative total shareholder return on comcast 2019s class a common stock during the five years ended december 31 , 2015 with the cumulative total returns on the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and with a select peer group consisting of us and other companies engaged in the cable , communications and media industries . this peer group consists of us , as well as cablevision systems corporation ( class a ) , dish network corporation ( class a ) , directv inc . ( included through july 24 , 2015 , the date of acquisition by at&t corp. ) and time warner cable inc . ( the 201ccable subgroup 201d ) , and time warner inc. , walt disney company , viacom inc . ( class b ) , twenty-first century fox , inc . ( class a ) , and cbs corporation ( class b ) ( the 201cmedia subgroup 201d ) . the peer group was constructed as a composite peer group in which the cable subgroup is weighted 63% ( 63 % ) and the media subgroup is weighted 37% ( 37 % ) based on the respective revenue of our cable communications and nbcuniversal segments . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2010 in our class a common stock and in each of the following indices and assumes the reinvestment of dividends . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return 12/1412/1312/1212/10 12/15 comcast class a s&p 500 peer group index .

Table: 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 comcast class a $ 110 $ 177 $ 250 $ 282 $ 279 s&p 500 stock index $ 102 $ 118 $ 156 $ 177 $ 180 peer group index $ 110 $ 157 $ 231 $ 267 $ 265

nbcuniversal nbcuniversal is a wholly owned subsidiary of nbcuniversal holdings and there is no market for its equity securities . 39 comcast 2015 annual report on form 10-k .

Question: what was the differencet in percentage 5 year cumulative total return for comcast class a stock and the s&p 500 stock index for the year ended 2015?
Answer: 99%
Calculation: subtract(divide(subtract(279, 100), 100), divide(subtract(180, 100), 100))
comparison of cumulative return among lkq corporation , the nasdaq stock market ( u.s. ) index and the peer group .

Table: 12/31/2007 12/31/2008 12/31/2009 12/31/2010 12/31/2011 12/31/2012 lkq corporation $ 100 $ 55 $ 93 $ 108 $ 143 $ 201 nasdaq stock market ( u.s. ) index $ 100 $ 59 $ 86 $ 100 $ 98 $ 114 peer group $ 100 $ 83 $ 100 $ 139 $ 187 $ 210

this stock performance information is "furnished" and shall not be deemed to be "soliciting material" or subject to rule 14a , shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of section 18 of the securities exchange act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section , and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the securities act of 1933 or the securities exchange act of 1934 , whether made before or after the date of this report and irrespective of any general incorporation by reference language in any such filing , except to the extent that it specifically incorporates the information by reference . information about our common stock that may be issued under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2012 included in part iii , item 12 of this annual report on form 10-k is incorporated herein by reference. .

Question: what was the difference in percentage of cumulative return for lkq corporation and the peer group for the five years ended 12/31/2012?
Answer: -9%
Calculation: divide(subtract(210, 100), 100)
the contractual maturities of held-to-maturity securities as of january 30 , 2009 were in excess of three years and were $ 31.4 million at cost and $ 28.9 million at fair value , respectively . for the successor year ended january 30 , 2009 and period ended february 1 , 2008 , and the predecessor period ended july 6 , 2007 and year ended february 2 , 2007 , gross realized gains and losses on the sales of available-for-sale securities were not material . the cost of securities sold is based upon the specific identification method . merchandise inventories inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market with cost determined using the retail last-in , first-out ( 201clifo 201d ) method . under the company 2019s retail inventory method ( 201crim 201d ) , the calculation of gross profit and the resulting valuation of inventories at cost are computed by applying a calculated cost-to-retail inventory ratio to the retail value of sales at a department level . costs directly associated with warehousing and distribution are capitalized into inventory . the excess of current cost over lifo cost was approximately $ 50.0 million at january 30 , 2009 and $ 6.1 million at february 1 , 2008 . current cost is determined using the retail first-in , first-out method . the company 2019s lifo reserves were adjusted to zero at july 6 , 2007 as a result of the merger . the successor recorded lifo provisions of $ 43.9 million and $ 6.1 million during 2008 and 2007 , respectively . the predecessor recorded a lifo credit of $ 1.5 million in 2006 . in 2008 , the increased commodity cost pressures mainly related to food and pet products which have been driven by fruit and vegetable prices and rising freight costs . increases in petroleum , resin , metals , pulp and other raw material commodity driven costs also resulted in multiple product cost increases . the company intends to address these commodity cost increases through negotiations with its vendors and by increasing retail prices as necessary . on a quarterly basis , the company estimates the annual impact of commodity cost fluctuations based upon the best available information at that point in time . store pre-opening costs pre-opening costs related to new store openings and the construction periods are expensed as incurred . property and equipment property and equipment are recorded at cost . the company provides for depreciation and amortization on a straight-line basis over the following estimated useful lives: .

Table: land improvements 20 buildings 39-40 furniture fixtures and equipment 3-10

improvements of leased properties are amortized over the shorter of the life of the applicable lease term or the estimated useful life of the asset. .

Question: what was the total lifo provisions recorded by the successor from 2007 to 2008 in millions
Answer: 50
Calculation: add(43.9, 6.1)
Explanation: the total is the sum of all amounts
schlumberger limited and subsidiaries shares of common stock issued in treasury shares outstanding ( stated in millions ) .

Table: issued in treasury shares outstanding balance january 1 2008 1334 -138 ( 138 ) 1196 shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged 2013 5 5 shares issued under employee stock purchase plan 2013 2 2 stock repurchase program 2013 -21 ( 21 ) -21 ( 21 ) issued on conversions of debentures 2013 12 12 balance december 31 2008 1334 -140 ( 140 ) 1194 shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged 2013 4 4 vesting of restricted stock 2013 1 1 shares issued under employee stock purchase plan 2013 4 4 stock repurchase program 2013 -8 ( 8 ) -8 ( 8 ) balance december 31 2009 1334 -139 ( 139 ) 1195 acquisition of smith international inc . 100 76 176 shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged 2013 6 6 shares issued under employee stock purchase plan 2013 3 3 stock repurchase program 2013 -27 ( 27 ) -27 ( 27 ) issued on conversions of debentures 2013 8 8 balance december 31 2010 1434 -73 ( 73 ) 1361

see the notes to consolidated financial statements part ii , item 8 .

Question: what was the average beginning and ending balance of shares in millions outstanding during 2009?
Answer: 1194.5
Calculation: divide(add(1194, 1195), const_2)
provision for income taxes increased $ 1791 million in 2012 from 2011 primarily due to the increase in pretax income from continuing operations , including the impact of the resumption of sales in libya in the first quarter of 2012 . the following is an analysis of the effective income tax rates for 2012 and 2011: .

Table: 2012 2011 statutory rate applied to income from continuing operations before income taxes 35% ( 35 % ) 35% ( 35 % ) effects of foreign operations including foreign tax credits 18 6 change in permanent reinvestment assertion 2014 5 adjustments to valuation allowances 21 14 tax law changes 2014 1 effective income tax rate on continuing operations 74% ( 74 % ) 61% ( 61 % )

the effective income tax rate is influenced by a variety of factors including the geographic sources of income and the relative magnitude of these sources of income . the provision for income taxes is allocated on a discrete , stand-alone basis to pretax segment income and to individual items not allocated to segments . the difference between the total provision and the sum of the amounts allocated to segments appears in the "corporate and other unallocated items" shown in the reconciliation of segment income to net income below . effects of foreign operations 2013 the effects of foreign operations on our effective tax rate increased in 2012 as compared to 2011 , primarily due to the resumption of sales in libya in the first quarter of 2012 , where the statutory rate is in excess of 90 percent . change in permanent reinvestment assertion 2013 in the second quarter of 2011 , we recorded $ 716 million of deferred u.s . tax on undistributed earnings of $ 2046 million that we previously intended to permanently reinvest in foreign operations . offsetting this tax expense were associated foreign tax credits of $ 488 million . in addition , we reduced our valuation allowance related to foreign tax credits by $ 228 million due to recognizing deferred u.s . tax on previously undistributed earnings . adjustments to valuation allowances 2013 in 2012 and 2011 , we increased the valuation allowance against foreign tax credits because it is more likely than not that we will be unable to realize all u.s . benefits on foreign taxes accrued in those years . see item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data - note 10 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about income taxes . discontinued operations is presented net of tax , and reflects our downstream business that was spun off june 30 , 2011 and our angola business which we agreed to sell in 2013 . see item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data 2013 notes 3 and 6 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information. .

Question: what was the average effective income tax rate on continuing operations?
Answer: 67.5
Calculation: divide(add(74, 61), const_2)
table of contents index to financial statements item 3 . legal proceedings . item 4 . mine safety disclosures . not applicable . part ii price range our common stock trades on the nasdaq global select market under the symbol 201cmktx 201d . the range of closing price information for our common stock , as reported by nasdaq , was as follows : on february 16 , 2012 , the last reported closing price of our common stock on the nasdaq global select market was $ 32.65 . holders there were 41 holders of record of our common stock as of february 16 , 2012 . dividend policy we initiated a regular quarterly dividend in the fourth quarter of 2009 . during 2010 and 2011 , we paid quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.07 per share and $ 0.09 per share , respectively . in january 2012 , our board of directors approved a quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.11 per share payable on march 1 , 2012 to stockholders of record as of the close of business on february 16 , 2012 . any future declaration and payment of dividends will be at the sole discretion of the company 2019s board of directors . the board of directors may take into account such matters as general business conditions , the company 2019s financial results , capital requirements , contractual , legal , and regulatory restrictions on the payment of dividends to the company 2019s stockholders or by the company 2019s subsidiaries to the parent and any such other factors as the board of directors may deem relevant . recent sales of unregistered securities item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities. .

Table: 2011: high low january 1 2011 to march 31 2011 $ 24.19 $ 19.78 april 1 2011 to june 30 2011 $ 25.22 $ 21.00 july 1 2011 to september 30 2011 $ 30.75 $ 23.41 october 1 2011 to december 31 2011 $ 31.16 $ 24.57 2010: high low january 1 2010 to march 31 2010 $ 16.20 $ 13.25 april 1 2010 to june 30 2010 $ 17.40 $ 13.45 july 1 2010 to september 30 2010 $ 17.30 $ 12.39 october 1 2010 to december 31 2010 $ 20.93 $ 16.93

.

Question: what was the total cash dividend paid to holders of common stock as of february 12 , 2012?
Answer: $ 4.51
Calculation: multiply(41, 0.11)
we believe that the presentation of adjusted diluted earnings per share , which excludes withdrawal costs 2013 multiemployer pension funds , restructuring charges , loss on extinguishment of debt , and ( gain ) loss on business dispositions and impairments , net , provides an understanding of operational activities before the financial effect of certain items . we use this measure , and believe investors will find it helpful , in understanding the ongoing performance of our operations separate from items that have a disproportionate effect on our results for a particular period . we have incurred comparable charges and costs in prior periods , and similar types of adjustments can reasonably be expected to be recorded in future periods . our definition of adjusted diluted earnings per share may not be comparable to similarly titled measures presented by other companies . property and equipment , net in 2017 , we anticipate receiving approximately $ 975 million of property and equipment , net of proceeds from sales of property and equipment , as follows: .

Table: trucks and equipment $ 350 landfill 330 containers 160 facilities and other 150 property and equipment received during 2017 990 proceeds from sales of property and equipment -15 ( 15 ) property and equipment received net of proceeds during 2017 $ 975

results of operations revenue we generate revenue primarily from our solid waste collection operations . our remaining revenue is from other services , including transfer station , landfill disposal , recycling , and energy services . our residential and small- container commercial collection operations in some markets are based on long-term contracts with municipalities . certain of our municipal contracts have annual price escalation clauses that are tied to changes in an underlying base index such as a consumer price index . we generally provide small-container commercial and large-container industrial collection services to customers under contracts with terms up to three years . our transfer stations , landfills and , to a lesser extent , our recycling facilities generate revenue from disposal or tipping fees charged to third parties . in general , we integrate our recycling operations with our collection operations and obtain revenue from the sale of recycled commodities . our revenue from energy services consists mainly of fees we charge for the treatment of liquid and solid waste derived from the production of oil and natural gas . other revenue consists primarily of revenue from national accounts , which represents the portion of revenue generated from nationwide or regional contracts in markets outside our operating areas where the associated waste handling services are subcontracted to local operators . consequently , substantially all of this revenue is offset with related subcontract costs , which are recorded in cost of operations. .

Question: as part of the sales proceeds net what was the percent of the trucks and equipment
Answer: 35.9%
Calculation: divide(350, 975)
declaration and payment of future quarterly dividends is at the discretion of our board and may be adjusted as business needs or market conditions change . in addition , under the terms of the merger agreement , we have agreed with aetna to coordinate the declaration and payment of dividends so that our stockholders do not fail to receive a quarterly dividend around the time of the closing of the merger . on october 29 , 2015 , the board declared a cash dividend of $ 0.29 per share that was paid on january 29 , 2016 to stockholders of record on december 30 , 2015 , for an aggregate amount of $ 43 million . stock total return performance the following graph compares our total return to stockholders with the returns of the standard & poor 2019s composite 500 index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and the dow jones us select health care providers index ( 201cpeer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2015 . the graph assumes an investment of $ 100 in each of our common stock , the s&p 500 , and the peer group on december 31 , 2010 , and that dividends were reinvested when paid. .

Table: 12/31/2010 12/31/2011 12/31/2012 12/31/2013 12/31/2014 12/31/2015 hum $ 100 $ 162 $ 128 $ 195 $ 274 $ 343 s&p 500 $ 100 $ 102 $ 118 $ 157 $ 178 $ 181 peer group $ 100 $ 110 $ 129 $ 177 $ 226 $ 239

the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .

Question: as of december 30 , what was the number of stockholders of record 2015 in millions
Answer: 148
Calculation: divide(43, 0.29)