bevaya/FinQA huggingface dataset:
entergy louisiana , llc and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2017 compared to 2016 net income decreased $ 305.7 million primarily due to the effect of the enactment of the tax cuts and jobs act , in december 2017 , which resulted in a decrease of $ 182.6 million in net income in 2017 , and the effect of a settlement with the irs related to the 2010-2011 irs audit , which resulted in a $ 136.1 million reduction of income tax expense in 2016 . also contributing to the decrease in net income were higher other operation and maintenance expenses . the decrease was partially offset by higher net revenue and higher other income . see note 3 to the financial statements for discussion of the effects of the tax cuts and jobs act and the irs audit . 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 175.4 million primarily due to the effect of a settlement with the irs related to the 2010-2011 irs audit , which resulted in a $ 136.1 million reduction of income tax expense in 2016 . also contributing to the increase were lower other operation and maintenance expenses , higher net revenue , and higher other income . the increase was partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses , higher interest expense , and higher nuclear refueling outage expenses . see note 3 to the financial statements for discussion of the irs audit . net revenue 2017 compared to 2016 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 . amount ( in millions ) .

Table: amount ( in millions ) 2016 net revenue $ 2438.4 regulatory credit resulting from reduction of thefederal corporate income tax rate 55.5 retail electric price 42.8 louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation 17.2 volume/weather -12.4 ( 12.4 ) other 19.0 2017 net revenue $ 2560.5

the regulatory credit resulting from reduction of the federal corporate income tax rate variance is due to the reduction of the vidalia purchased power agreement regulatory liability by $ 30.5 million and the reduction of the louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation regulatory liabilities by $ 25 million as a result of the enactment of the tax cuts and jobs act , in december 2017 , which lowered the federal corporate income tax rate from 35% ( 35 % ) to 21% ( 21 % ) . the effects of the tax cuts and jobs act are discussed further in note 3 to the financial statements. .

Question: in 2017 what was the percentage change in the net revenue
Answer: 5%
Calculation: divide(subtract(2560.5, 2438.4), 2438.4)
entergy mississippi , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to lower profit on joint account sales and reduced capacity revenue from the municipal energy agency of mississippi . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 152.5 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates , partially offset by a decrease of $ 43 million in gross wholesale revenues due to a decrease in net generation and purchases in excess of decreased net area demand resulting in less energy available for resale sales coupled with a decrease in system agreement remedy receipts . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power , partially offset by decreased demand and decreased recovery from customers of deferred fuel costs . other regulatory charges increased primarily due to increased recovery through the grand gulf rider of grand gulf capacity costs due to higher rates and increased recovery of costs associated with the power management recovery rider . there is no material effect on net income due to quarterly adjustments to the power management recovery rider . 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 . amount ( in millions ) .

Table: amount ( in millions ) 2006 net revenue $ 466.1 base revenue 7.9 volume/weather 4.5 transmission revenue 4.1 transmission equalization 4.0 reserve equalization 3.8 attala costs -10.2 ( 10.2 ) other 6.7 2007 net revenue $ 486.9

the base revenue variance is primarily due to a formula rate plan increase effective july 2007 . the formula rate plan filing is discussed further in "state and local rate regulation" below . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to increased electricity usage primarily in the residential and commercial sectors , including the effect of more favorable weather on billed electric sales in 2007 compared to 2006 . billed electricity usage increased 214 gwh . the increase in usage was partially offset by decreased usage in the industrial sector . the transmission revenue variance is due to higher rates and the addition of new transmission customers in late 2006 . the transmission equalization variance is primarily due to a revision made in 2006 of transmission equalization receipts among entergy companies . the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to a revision in 2006 of reserve equalization payments among entergy companies due to a ferc ruling regarding the inclusion of interruptible loads in reserve .

Question: what is the percentage change in net revenue in 2007 compare to 2006?
Answer: 4.5%
Calculation: divide(subtract(486.9, 466.1), 466.1)
schedule iii page 6 of 6 host hotels & resorts , inc. , and subsidiaries host hotels & resorts , l.p. , and subsidiaries real estate and accumulated depreciation december 31 , 2017 ( in millions ) ( b ) the change in accumulated depreciation and amortization of real estate assets for the fiscal years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 is as follows: .

Table: balance at december 31 2014 $ 5283 depreciation and amortization 558 dispositions and other -148 ( 148 ) depreciation on assets held for sale -27 ( 27 ) balance at december 31 2015 5666 depreciation and amortization 572 dispositions and other -159 ( 159 ) depreciation on assets held for sale -130 ( 130 ) balance at december 31 2016 5949 depreciation and amortization 563 dispositions and other -247 ( 247 ) depreciation on assets held for sale 7 balance at december 31 2017 $ 6272

( c ) the aggregate cost of real estate for federal income tax purposes is approximately $ 10698 million at december 31 , 2017 . ( d ) the total cost of properties excludes construction-in-progress properties. .

Question: what was the net change in millions in the accumulated depreciation and amortization of real estate assets from 2014 to 2015?
Answer: 383
Calculation: subtract(5666, 5283)
entergy arkansas , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2008 compared to 2007 net income decreased $ 92.0 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , and a higher effective income tax rate , partially offset by higher net revenue . the higher other operation and maintenance expenses resulted primarily from the write-off of approximately $ 70.8 million of costs as a result of the december 2008 arkansas court of appeals decision in entergy arkansas' base rate case . the base rate case is discussed in more detail in note 2 to the financial statements . 2007 compared to 2006 net income decreased $ 34.0 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , and a higher effective income tax rate . the decrease was partially offset by higher net revenue . net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) .

Table: amount ( in millions ) 2007 net revenue $ 1110.6 rider revenue 13.6 purchased power capacity 4.8 volume/weather -14.6 ( 14.6 ) other 3.5 2008 net revenue $ 1117.9

the rider revenue variance is primarily due to an energy efficiency rider which became effective in november 2007 . the establishment of the rider results in an increase in rider revenue and a corresponding increase in other operation and maintenance expense with no effect on net income . also contributing to the variance was an increase in franchise tax rider revenue as a result of higher retail revenues . the corresponding increase is in taxes other than income taxes , resulting in no effect on net income . the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to lower reserve equalization expenses . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of less favorable weather on residential and commercial sales during the billed and unbilled sales periods compared to 2007 and a 2.9% ( 2.9 % ) volume decrease in industrial sales , primarily in the wood industry and the small customer class . billed electricity usage decreased 333 gwh in all sectors . see "critical accounting estimates" below and note 1 to the financial statements for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues. .

Question: what is the percent change in net revenue between 2007 and 2008?
Answer: 0.7%
Calculation: divide(subtract(1110.6, 1117.9), 1117.9)
performance graph the performance graph below shows the five-year cumulative total stockholder return on applied common stock during the period from october 25 , 2009 through october 26 , 2014 . this is compared with the cumulative total return of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and the rdg semiconductor composite index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on october 25 , 2009 in applied common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , if any . dollar amounts in the graph are rounded to the nearest whole dollar . the performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among applied materials , inc. , the s&p 500 index 201cs&p 201d is a registered trademark of standard & poor 2019s financial services llc , a subsidiary of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc. .

Table: 10/25/2009 10/31/2010 10/30/2011 10/28/2012 10/27/2013 10/26/2014 applied materials 100.00 97.43 101.85 88.54 151.43 183.29 s&p 500 index 100.00 116.52 125.94 145.09 184.52 216.39 rdg semiconductor composite index 100.00 121.00 132.42 124.95 163.20 207.93

dividends during fiscal 2014 , applied 2019s board of directors declared four quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.10 per share each . during fiscal 2013 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.10 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.09 per share . during fiscal 2012 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.09 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.08 . dividends declared during fiscal 2014 , 2013 and 2012 totaled $ 487 million , $ 469 million and $ 438 million , respectively . applied currently anticipates that it will continue to pay cash dividends on a quarterly basis in the future , although the declaration and amount of any future cash dividends are at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on applied 2019s financial condition , results of operations , capital requirements , business conditions and other factors , as well as a determination that cash dividends are in the best interests of applied 2019s stockholders . $ 100 invested on 10/25/09 in stock or 10/31/09 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . and the rdg semiconductor composite index 183145 97 102 121 132 10/25/09 10/31/10 10/30/11 10/28/12 10/27/13 10/26/14 applied materials , inc . s&p 500 rdg semiconductor composite .

Question: what is the return on investment for applied materials if the investment occurred in 2009 and it is liquidated in 2012?
Answer: 11.5%
Calculation: divide(subtract(88.54, const_100), const_100)
notes to consolidated financial statements 236 jpmorgan chase & co./2010 annual report the table below sets forth the accretable yield activity for the firm 2019s pci consumer loans for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and .

Table: year ended december 31 , ( in millions except ratios ) year ended december 31 , 2010 year ended december 31 , 2009 2008 balance january 1 $ 25544 $ 32619 $ 2014 washington mutual acquisition 2014 2014 39454 accretion into interest income -3232 ( 3232 ) -4363 ( 4363 ) -1292 ( 1292 ) changes in interest rates on variable rate loans -819 ( 819 ) -4849 ( 4849 ) -5543 ( 5543 ) other changes in expected cash flows ( a ) -2396 ( 2396 ) 2137 2014 balance december 31 $ 19097 $ 25544 $ 32619 accretable yield percentage 4.35% ( 4.35 % ) 5.14% ( 5.14 % ) 5.81% ( 5.81 % )

( a ) other changes in expected cash flows may vary from period to period as the firm continues to refine its cash flow model and periodically updates model assumptions . for the years ended december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , other changes in expected cash flows were principally driven by changes in prepayment assumptions , as well as reclassification to the nonaccretable difference . such changes are expected to have an insignificant impact on the accretable yield percentage . the factors that most significantly affect estimates of gross cash flows expected to be collected , and accordingly the accretable yield balance , include : ( i ) changes in the benchmark interest rate indices for variable rate products such as option arm and home equity loans ; and ( ii ) changes in prepayment assump- tions . to date , the decrease in the accretable yield percentage has been primarily related to a decrease in interest rates on vari- able-rate loans and , to a lesser extent , extended loan liquida- tion periods . certain events , such as extended loan liquidation periods , affect the timing of expected cash flows but not the amount of cash expected to be received ( i.e. , the accretable yield balance ) . extended loan liquidation periods reduce the accretable yield percentage because the same accretable yield balance is recognized against a higher-than-expected loan balance over a longer-than-expected period of time. .

Question: what was the average balance of total pci consumer loans for the years ended december 31 , 2010 and 2009?
Answer: 22321
Calculation: divide(add(19097, 25544), const_2)
through the certegy merger , the company has an obligation to service $ 200 million ( aggregate principal amount ) of unsecured 4.75% ( 4.75 % ) fixed-rate notes due in 2008 . the notes were recorded in purchase accounting at a discount of $ 5.7 million , which is being amortized over the term of the notes . the notes accrue interest at a rate of 4.75% ( 4.75 % ) per year , payable semi-annually in arrears on each march 15 and september 15 . on april 11 , 2005 , fis entered into interest rate swap agreements which have effectively fixed the interest rate at approximately 5.4% ( 5.4 % ) through april 2008 on $ 350 million of the term loan facilities ( or its replacement debt ) and at approximately 5.2% ( 5.2 % ) through april 2007 on an additional $ 350 million of the term loan . the company has designated these interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges in accordance with sfas no . 133 . the estimated fair value of the cash flow hedges results in an asset to the company of $ 4.9 million and $ 5.2 million , as of december 31 , 2006 and december 31 , 2005 , respectively , which is included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets in other noncurrent assets and as a component of accumulated other comprehensive earnings , net of deferred taxes . a portion of the amount included in accumulated other comprehensive earnings is reclassified into interest expense as a yield adjustment as interest payments are made on the term loan facilities . the company 2019s existing cash flow hedges are highly effective and there is no current impact on earnings due to hedge ineffectiveness . it is the policy of the company to execute such instruments with credit-worthy banks and not to enter into derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes . principal maturities at december 31 , 2006 ( and at december 31 , 2006 after giving effect to the debt refinancing completed on january 18 , 2007 ) for the next five years and thereafter are as follows ( in thousands ) : december 31 , january 18 , 2007 refinancing .

Table: december 31 2006 january 18 2007 refinancing 2007 $ 61661 $ 96161 2008 257541 282041 2009 68129 145129 2010 33586 215586 2011 941875 165455 thereafter 1646709 2105129 total $ 3009501 $ 3009501

fidelity national information services , inc . and subsidiaries and affiliates consolidated and combined financial statements notes to consolidated and combined financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .

Question: what was the change , in thousands , of principal maturities due in 2008 after the the debt refinancing completed on january 18 , 2007?
Answer: -24500
Calculation: subtract(257541, 282041)
changes in our performance retention awards during 2009 were as follows : shares ( thous. ) weighted-average grant-date fair value .

Table: shares ( thous. ) weighted-averagegrant-date fair value nonvested at january 1 2009 873 $ 50.70 granted 449 47.28 vested -240 ( 240 ) 43.23 forfeited -22 ( 22 ) 53.86 nonvested at december 31 2009 1060 $ 50.88

at december 31 , 2009 , there was $ 22 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested performance retention awards , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.3 years . a portion of this expense is subject to achievement of the roic levels established for the performance stock unit grants . 5 . retirement plans pension and other postretirement benefits pension plans 2013 we provide defined benefit retirement income to eligible non-union employees through qualified and non-qualified ( supplemental ) pension plans . qualified and non-qualified pension benefits are based on years of service and the highest compensation during the latest years of employment , with specific reductions made for early retirements . other postretirement benefits ( opeb ) 2013 we provide defined contribution medical and life insurance benefits for eligible retirees . these benefits are funded as medical claims and life insurance premiums are plan amendment effective january 1 , 2010 , medicare-eligible retirees who are enrolled in the union pacific retiree medical program will receive a contribution to a health reimbursement account , which can be used to pay eligible out-of-pocket medical expenses . the impact of the plan amendment is reflected in the projected benefit obligation ( pbo ) at december 31 , 2009 . funded status we are required by gaap to separately recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of our pension and opeb plans as an asset or liability . the funded status represents the difference between the pbo and the fair value of the plan assets . the pbo is the present value of benefits earned to date by plan participants , including the effect of assumed future salary increases . the pbo of the opeb plan is equal to the accumulated benefit obligation , as the present value of the opeb liabilities is not affected by salary increases . plan assets are measured at fair value . we use a december 31 measurement date for plan assets and obligations for all our retirement plans. .

Question: what is the annual compensation expense for the remaining unvested performance retention awards?
Answer: 1692307
Calculation: divide(multiply(22, const_1000000), 1.3)
company stock performance the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 composite index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology index . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 composite index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology index as of the market close on september 30 , 2007 . data points on the graph are annual . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . sep-11sep-10sep-09sep-08sep-07 sep-12 apple inc . s&p 500 s&p computer hardware dow jones us technology comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among apple inc. , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones us technology index *$ 100 invested on 9/30/07 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending september 30 . copyright a9 2012 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 .

Table: september 30 2007 september 30 2008 september 30 2009 september 30 2010 september 30 2011 september 30 2012 apple inc . $ 100 $ 74 $ 121 $ 185 $ 248 $ 437 s&p 500 $ 100 $ 78 $ 73 $ 80 $ 81 $ 105 s&p computer hardware $ 100 $ 84 $ 99 $ 118 $ 134 $ 214 dow jones us technology $ 100 $ 76 $ 85 $ 95 $ 98 $ 127

.

Question: what was the cumulative total return on the s&p 500 between september 30 2007 and september 30 2012?
Answer: 5
Calculation: subtract(105, const_100)
entergy arkansas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities . results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income decreased $ 7.7 million primarily due to a higher effective income tax rate , lower other income , and higher other operation and maintenance expenses , substantially offset by higher net revenue , lower depreciation and amortization expenses , and lower interest expense . 2010 compared to 2009 net income increased $ 105.7 million primarily due to higher net revenue , a lower effective income tax rate , higher other income , and lower depreciation and amortization expenses , partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses . net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 . amount ( in millions ) .

Table: amount ( in millions ) 2010 net revenue $ 1216.7 retail electric price 31.0 ano decommissioning trust 26.4 transmission revenue 13.1 volume/weather -15.9 ( 15.9 ) net wholesale revenue -11.9 ( 11.9 ) capacity acquisition recovery -10.3 ( 10.3 ) other 3.2 2011 net revenue $ 1252.3

the retail electric price variance is primarily due to a base rate increase effective july 2010 . see note 2 to the financial statements for more discussion of the rate case settlement . the ano decommissioning trust variance is primarily related to the deferral of investment gains from the ano 1 and 2 decommissioning trust in 2010 in accordance with regulatory treatment . the gains resulted in an increase in 2010 in interest and investment income and a corresponding increase in regulatory charges with no effect on net income. .

Question: what was the percent of the change in the net revenue in 2011
Answer: 2.9%
Calculation: subtract(1252.3, 1216.7)