bevaya/FinQA huggingface dataset:
stock performance graph * $ 100 invested on december 31 , 2011 in our stock or in the relevant index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ended december 31 , 2016 . ( 1 ) delphi automotive plc ( 2 ) s&p 500 2013 standard & poor 2019s 500 total return index ( 3 ) automotive supplier peer group 2013 russell 3000 auto parts index , including american axle & manufacturing , borgwarner inc. , cooper tire & rubber company , dana inc. , delphi automotive plc , dorman products inc. , federal-mogul corp. , ford motor co. , general motors co. , gentex corp. , gentherm inc. , genuine parts co. , goodyear tire & rubber co. , johnson controls international plc , lear corp. , lkq corp. , meritor inc. , standard motor products inc. , stoneridge inc. , superior industries international , tenneco inc. , tesla motors inc. , tower international inc. , visteon corp. , and wabco holdings inc . company index december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 .

Table: company index december 31 2011 december 31 2012 december 31 2013 december 31 2014 december 31 2015 december 31 2016 delphi automotive plc ( 1 ) $ 100.00 $ 177.58 $ 283.02 $ 347.40 $ 414.58 $ 331.43 s&p 500 ( 2 ) 100.00 116.00 153.58 174.60 177.01 198.18 automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ) 100.00 127.04 188.67 203.06 198.34 202.30

dividends the company has declared and paid cash dividends of $ 0.25 and $ 0.29 per ordinary share in each quarter of 2015 and 2016 , respectively . in addition , in january 2017 , the board of directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.29 per ordinary share , payable on february 15 , 2017 to shareholders of record at the close of business on february 6 , 2017. .

Question: what was the percentage return for the 5 year period ending december 31 2016 of delphi automotive plc?
Answer: 231.43%
Calculation: divide(subtract(331.43, const_100), const_100)
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities . price range our common stock trades on the nasdaq global select market under the symbol 201cmktx 201d . the range of closing price information for our common stock , as reported by nasdaq , was as follows : on february 20 , 2015 , the last reported closing price of our common stock on the nasdaq global select market was $ 78.97 . holders there were 28 holders of record of our common stock as of february 20 , 2015 . dividend policy during 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , we paid quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.16 per share , $ 0.13 per share and $ 0.11 per share , respectively . on december 27 , 2012 , we paid a special cash dividend of $ 1.30 per share . in january 2015 , our board of directors approved a quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.20 per share payable on february 26 , 2015 to stockholders of record as of the close of business on february 12 , 2015 . any future declaration and payment of dividends will be at the sole discretion of our board of directors . the board of directors may take into account such matters as general business conditions , our financial results , capital requirements , contractual obligations , legal and regulatory restrictions on the payment of dividends to our stockholders or by our subsidiaries to their respective parent entities , and such other factors as the board of directors may deem relevant . recent sales of unregistered securities securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans please see the section entitled 201cequity compensation plan information 201d in item 12. .

Table: 2014: high low january 1 2014 to march 31 2014 $ 67.16 $ 57.99 april 1 2014 to june 30 2014 $ 59.65 $ 50.30 july 1 2014 to september 30 2014 $ 62.05 $ 47.50 october 1 2014 to december 31 2014 $ 73.25 $ 61.15 2013: high low january 1 2013 to march 31 2013 $ 41.85 $ 34.79 april 1 2013 to june 30 2013 $ 47.80 $ 37.09 july 1 2013 to september 30 2013 $ 61.47 $ 47.59 october 1 2013 to december 31 2013 $ 70.60 $ 61.34

.

Question: between july 1 2014 to september 30 2014 what was the spread between the high and low price per share?
Answer: 14.55
Calculation: subtract(62.05, 47.50)
dividends for a summary of the cash dividends paid on citi 2019s outstanding common stock during 2009 and 2010 , see note 33 to the consolidated financial statements . for so long as the u.s . government holds any citigroup trust preferred securities acquired pursuant to the exchange offers consummated in 2009 , citigroup has agreed not to pay a quarterly common stock dividend exceeding $ 0.01 per quarter , subject to certain customary exceptions . further , any dividend on citi 2019s outstanding common stock would need to be made in compliance with citi 2019s obligations to any remaining outstanding citigroup preferred stock . performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citigroup 2019s common stock with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period extending through december 31 , 2010 . the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2005 in citigroup 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index and that all dividends were reinvested . citigroup s&p 500 index s&p financial index comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 .

Table: december 31, citigroup s&p 500 index s&p financial index 2006 119.55 115.79 119.19 2007 66.10 122.15 96.98 2008 15.88 76.96 43.34 2009 7.85 97.33 50.80 2010 11.22 111.99 56.96

.

Question: what was the difference in percentage cumulative total return between cititgroup's common stock and the s&p 500 index for the five year period ending 2010?
Calculation: subtract(divide(subtract(11.22, 100), 100), subtract(56.96, 100))
marathon oil corporation notes to consolidated financial statements stock-based performance unit awards 2013 during 2018 , 2017 and 2016 we granted 754140 , 563631 and 1205517 stock- based performance unit awards to officers . at december 31 , 2018 , there were 1196176 units outstanding . total stock-based performance unit awards expense was $ 13 million in 2018 , $ 8 million in 2017 and $ 6 million in 2016 . the key assumptions used in the monte carlo simulation to determine the fair value of stock-based performance units granted in 2018 , 2017 and 2016 were: .

Table: 2018 2017 2016 valuation date stock price $ 14.17 $ 14.17 $ 14.17 expected annual dividend yield 1.4% ( 1.4 % ) 1.4% ( 1.4 % ) 1.4% ( 1.4 % ) expected volatility 39% ( 39 % ) 43% ( 43 % ) 52% ( 52 % ) risk-free interest rate 2.5% ( 2.5 % ) 2.6% ( 2.6 % ) 2.4% ( 2.4 % ) fair value of stock-based performance units outstanding $ 19.60 $ 19.45 $ 21.51

18 . defined benefit postretirement plans and defined contribution plan we have noncontributory defined benefit pension plans covering substantially all domestic employees , as well as u.k . employees who were hired before april 2010 . certain employees located in e.g. , who are u.s . or u.k . based , also participate in these plans . benefits under these plans are based on plan provisions specific to each plan . for the u.k . pension plan , the principal employer and plan trustees reached a decision to close the plan to future benefit accruals effective december 31 , 2015 . we also have defined benefit plans for other postretirement benefits covering our u.s . employees . health care benefits are provided up to age 65 through comprehensive hospital , surgical and major medical benefit provisions subject to various cost- sharing features . post-age 65 health care benefits are provided to certain u.s . employees on a defined contribution basis . life insurance benefits are provided to certain retiree beneficiaries . these other postretirement benefits are not funded in advance . employees hired after 2016 are not eligible for any postretirement health care or life insurance benefits. .

Question: what was total stock-based performance unit awards expense in 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , in millions?
Answer: 27
Calculation: add(add(13, const_8), const_6)
measurement point december 31 booking holdings nasdaq composite index s&p 500 rdg internet composite .

Table: measurement pointdecember 31 booking holdings inc . nasdaqcomposite index s&p 500index rdg internetcomposite 2012 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 2013 187.37 141.63 132.39 163.02 2014 183.79 162.09 150.51 158.81 2015 205.51 173.33 152.59 224.05 2016 236.31 187.19 170.84 235.33 2017 280.10 242.29 208.14 338.52

sales of unregistered securities between october 1 , 2017 and december 31 , 2017 , we issued 103343 shares of our common stock in connection with the conversion of $ 196.1 million principal amount of our 1.0% ( 1.0 % ) convertible senior notes due 2018 . the conversions were effected in accordance with the indenture , which provides that the principal amount of converted notes be paid in cash and the conversion premium be paid in cash and/or shares of common stock at our election . in each case , we chose to pay the conversion premium in shares of common stock ( fractional shares are paid in cash ) . the issuances of the shares were not registered under the securities act of 1933 , as amended ( the "act" ) pursuant to section 3 ( a ) ( 9 ) of the act. .

Question: what was the percent of the growth in meausurement of the booking holdings inc.2016 to 2017
Calculation: subtract(280.10, 236.31)
Explanation: the growth in measurement of the booking holdings inc.2016 to 2017 was 18.5%
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2014 to 2013 . amount ( in millions ) .

Table: amount ( in millions ) 2013 net revenue $ 5524 retail electric price 135 asset retirement obligation 56 volume/weather 36 miso deferral 16 net wholesale revenue -29 ( 29 ) other -3 ( 3 ) 2014 net revenue $ 5735

the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : 2022 increases in the energy efficiency rider at entergy arkansas , as approved by the apsc , effective july 2013 and july 2014 . energy efficiency revenues are offset by costs included in other operation and maintenance expenses and have minimal effect on net income ; 2022 the effect of the apsc 2019s order in entergy arkansas 2019s 2013 rate case , including an annual base rate increase effective january 2014 offset by a miso rider to provide customers credits in rates for transmission revenue received through miso ; 2022 a formula rate plan increase at entergy mississippi , as approved by the mspc , effective september 2013 ; 2022 an increase in entergy mississippi 2019s storm damage rider , as approved by the mpsc , effective october 2013 . the increase in the storm damage rider is offset by other operation and maintenance expenses and has no effect on net income ; 2022 an annual base rate increase at entergy texas , effective april 2014 , as a result of the puct 2019s order in the september 2013 rate case ; and 2022 a formula rate plan increase at entergy louisiana , as approved by the lpsc , effective december 2014 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of rate proceedings . the asset retirement obligation affects net revenue because entergy records a regulatory debit or credit for the difference between asset retirement obligation-related expenses and trust earnings plus asset retirement obligation- related costs collected in revenue . the variance is primarily caused by increases in regulatory credits because of decreases in decommissioning trust earnings and increases in depreciation and accretion expenses and increases in regulatory credits to realign the asset retirement obligation regulatory assets with regulatory treatment . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 3129 gwh , or 3% ( 3 % ) , in billed electricity usage primarily due to an increase in sales to industrial customers and the effect of more favorable weather on residential sales . the increase in industrial sales was primarily due to expansions , recovery of a major refining customer from an unplanned outage in 2013 , and continued moderate growth in the manufacturing sector . the miso deferral variance is primarily due to the deferral in 2014 of the non-fuel miso-related charges , as approved by the lpsc and the mpsc , partially offset by the deferral in april 2013 , as approved by the apsc , of costs incurred from march 2010 through december 2012 related to the transition and implementation of joining the miso .

Question: what is the retail electric price as a percentage of net revenue in 2013?
Answer: 2.44%
Calculation: divide(135, 5524)
through the certegy merger , the company has an obligation to service $ 200 million ( aggregate principal amount ) of unsecured 4.75% ( 4.75 % ) fixed-rate notes due in 2008 . the notes were recorded in purchase accounting at a discount of $ 5.7 million , which is being amortized over the term of the notes . the notes accrue interest at a rate of 4.75% ( 4.75 % ) per year , payable semi-annually in arrears on each march 15 and september 15 . on april 11 , 2005 , fis entered into interest rate swap agreements which have effectively fixed the interest rate at approximately 5.4% ( 5.4 % ) through april 2008 on $ 350 million of the term loan facilities ( or its replacement debt ) and at approximately 5.2% ( 5.2 % ) through april 2007 on an additional $ 350 million of the term loan . the company has designated these interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges in accordance with sfas no . 133 . the estimated fair value of the cash flow hedges results in an asset to the company of $ 4.9 million and $ 5.2 million , as of december 31 , 2006 and december 31 , 2005 , respectively , which is included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets in other noncurrent assets and as a component of accumulated other comprehensive earnings , net of deferred taxes . a portion of the amount included in accumulated other comprehensive earnings is reclassified into interest expense as a yield adjustment as interest payments are made on the term loan facilities . the company 2019s existing cash flow hedges are highly effective and there is no current impact on earnings due to hedge ineffectiveness . it is the policy of the company to execute such instruments with credit-worthy banks and not to enter into derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes . principal maturities at december 31 , 2006 ( and at december 31 , 2006 after giving effect to the debt refinancing completed on january 18 , 2007 ) for the next five years and thereafter are as follows ( in thousands ) : december 31 , january 18 , 2007 refinancing .

Table: december 31 2006 january 18 2007 refinancing 2007 $ 61661 $ 96161 2008 257541 282041 2009 68129 145129 2010 33586 215586 2011 941875 165455 thereafter 1646709 2105129 total $ 3009501 $ 3009501

fidelity national information services , inc . and subsidiaries and affiliates consolidated and combined financial statements notes to consolidated and combined financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .

Question: what was the change , in thousands , of principal maturities due in 2007 after the the debt refinancing completed on january 18 , 2007?
Answer: -34500
Calculation: subtract(61661, 96161)
12 . brokerage receivables and brokerage payables citi has receivables and payables for financial instruments sold to and purchased from brokers , dealers and customers , which arise in the ordinary course of business . citi is exposed to risk of loss from the inability of brokers , dealers or customers to pay for purchases or to deliver the financial instruments sold , in which case citi would have to sell or purchase the financial instruments at prevailing market prices . credit risk is reduced to the extent that an exchange or clearing organization acts as a counterparty to the transaction and replaces the broker , dealer or customer in question . citi seeks to protect itself from the risks associated with customer activities by requiring customers to maintain margin collateral in compliance with regulatory and internal guidelines . margin levels are monitored daily , and customers deposit additional collateral as required . where customers cannot meet collateral requirements , citi may liquidate sufficient underlying financial instruments to bring the customer into compliance with the required margin level . exposure to credit risk is impacted by market volatility , which may impair the ability of clients to satisfy their obligations to citi . credit limits are established and closely monitored for customers and for brokers and dealers engaged in forwards , futures and other transactions deemed to be credit sensitive . brokerage receivables and brokerage payables consisted of the following: .

Table: in millions of dollars december 31 , 2017 december 31 , 2016 receivables from customers $ 19215 $ 10374 receivables from brokers dealers and clearing organizations 19169 18513 total brokerage receivables ( 1 ) $ 38384 $ 28887 payables to customers $ 38741 $ 37237 payables to brokers dealers and clearing organizations 22601 19915 total brokerage payables ( 1 ) $ 61342 $ 57152

payables to brokers , dealers and clearing organizations 22601 19915 total brokerage payables ( 1 ) $ 61342 $ 57152 ( 1 ) includes brokerage receivables and payables recorded by citi broker- dealer entities that are accounted for in accordance with the aicpa accounting guide for brokers and dealers in securities as codified in asc 940-320. .

Question: as of december 31 2017 what is the ratio of receivables from brokers dealers and clearing organizations to payables to brokers dealers and clearing organizations?
Answer: .85
Calculation: divide(19169, 22601)
Explanation: systemically if there is a large market disruption with less receivables from the brokerage industry than payables it is disadvantageous
marathon oil corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( g ) this obligation relates to a lease of equipment at united states steel 2019s clairton works cokemaking facility in pennsylvania . we are the primary obligor under this lease . under the financial matters agreement , united states steel has assumed responsibility for all obligations under this lease . this lease is an amortizing financing with a final maturity of 2012 . ( h ) these notes are senior secured notes of marathon oil canada corporation . the notes are secured by substantially all of marathon oil canada corporation 2019s assets . in january 2008 , we provided a full and unconditional guarantee covering the payment of all principal and interest due under the senior notes . ( i ) these obligations as of december 31 , 2009 include $ 36 million related to assets under construction at that date for which a capital lease will commence upon completion of construction . the amounts currently reported are based upon the percent of construction completed as of december 31 , 2009 and therefore do not reflect future minimum lease obligations of $ 164 million related to the asset . ( j ) payments of long-term debt for the years 2010 - 2014 are $ 102 million , $ 246 million , $ 1492 million , $ 287 million and $ 802 million . united steel is due to pay $ 17 million in 2010 , $ 161 million in 2011 , $ 19 million in 2012 , and $ 11 for year 2014 . ( k ) in the event of a change in control , as defined in the related agreements , debt obligations totaling $ 662 million at december 31 , 2009 , may be declared immediately due and payable . ( l ) see note 16 for information on interest rate swaps . 20 . asset retirement obligations the following summarizes the changes in asset retirement obligations : ( in millions ) 2009 2008 .

Table: ( in millions ) 2009 2008 asset retirement obligations as of january 1 $ 965 $ 1134 liabilities incurred including acquisitions 14 30 liabilities settled -65 ( 65 ) -94 ( 94 ) accretion expense ( included in depreciation depletion and amortization ) 64 66 revisions to previous estimates 124 24 held for sale - -195 ( 195 ) asset retirement obligations as of december 31 ( a ) $ 1102 $ 965

asset retirement obligations as of december 31 ( a ) $ 1102 $ 965 ( a ) includes asset retirement obligation of $ 3 and $ 2 million classified as short-term at december 31 , 2009 , and 2008. .

Question: what were total payments of long-term debt for the years 2010 - 2014 , in $ millions?
Answer: 2929
Calculation: add(add(add(add(102, 246), 1492), 287), 802)
table of contents company stock performance the following graph shows a comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index and the s&p information technology index for the five years ended september 27 , 2014 . the company has added the s&p information technology index to the graph to capture the stock performance of companies whose products and services relate to those of the company . the s&p information technology index replaces the s&p computer hardware index , which is no longer tracked by s&p . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index and the s&p information technology index as of the market close on september 25 , 2009 . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . copyright a9 2014 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . copyright a9 2014 dow jones & co . all rights reserved . apple inc . | 2014 form 10-k | 23 * $ 100 invested on 9/25/09 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . data points are the last day of each fiscal year for the company 2019s common stock and september 30th for indexes . september september september september september september .

Table: september 2009 september 2010 september 2011 september 2012 september 2013 september 2014 apple inc . $ 100 $ 160 $ 222 $ 367 $ 272 $ 407 s&p 500 index $ 100 $ 110 $ 111 $ 145 $ 173 $ 207 dow jones u.s . technology supersector index $ 100 $ 112 $ 115 $ 150 $ 158 $ 205 s&p information technology index $ 100 $ 111 $ 115 $ 152 $ 163 $ 210

.

Question: in what year did the s&p 500 have the greatest return?
Answer: 2014
Calculation: table_max(s&p 500 index, none)
dividends for a summary of the cash dividends paid on citi 2019s outstanding common stock during 2009 and 2010 , see note 33 to the consolidated financial statements . for so long as the u.s . government holds any citigroup trust preferred securities acquired pursuant to the exchange offers consummated in 2009 , citigroup has agreed not to pay a quarterly common stock dividend exceeding $ 0.01 per quarter , subject to certain customary exceptions . further , any dividend on citi 2019s outstanding common stock would need to be made in compliance with citi 2019s obligations to any remaining outstanding citigroup preferred stock . performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citigroup 2019s common stock with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period extending through december 31 , 2010 . the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2005 in citigroup 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index and that all dividends were reinvested . citigroup s&p 500 index s&p financial index comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 .

Table: december 31, citigroup s&p 500 index s&p financial index 2006 119.55 115.79 119.19 2007 66.10 122.15 96.98 2008 15.88 76.96 43.34 2009 7.85 97.33 50.80 2010 11.22 111.99 56.96

.

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total return for cititgroup's common stock for the five year period ending 2010?
Answer: -88.78%
Calculation: divide(subtract(11.22, 100), 100)