bevaya/FinQA huggingface dataset:
entergy mississippi , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to lower profit on joint account sales and reduced capacity revenue from the municipal energy agency of mississippi . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 152.5 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates , partially offset by a decrease of $ 43 million in gross wholesale revenues due to a decrease in net generation and purchases in excess of decreased net area demand resulting in less energy available for resale sales coupled with a decrease in system agreement remedy receipts . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power , partially offset by decreased demand and decreased recovery from customers of deferred fuel costs . other regulatory charges increased primarily due to increased recovery through the grand gulf rider of grand gulf capacity costs due to higher rates and increased recovery of costs associated with the power management recovery rider . there is no material effect on net income due to quarterly adjustments to the power management recovery rider . 2007 compared to 2006 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2007 to 2006 . amount ( in millions ) .

Table: amount ( in millions ) 2006 net revenue $ 466.1 base revenue 7.9 volume/weather 4.5 transmission revenue 4.1 transmission equalization 4.0 reserve equalization 3.8 attala costs -10.2 ( 10.2 ) other 6.7 2007 net revenue $ 486.9

the base revenue variance is primarily due to a formula rate plan increase effective july 2007 . the formula rate plan filing is discussed further in "state and local rate regulation" below . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to increased electricity usage primarily in the residential and commercial sectors , including the effect of more favorable weather on billed electric sales in 2007 compared to 2006 . billed electricity usage increased 214 gwh . the increase in usage was partially offset by decreased usage in the industrial sector . the transmission revenue variance is due to higher rates and the addition of new transmission customers in late 2006 . the transmission equalization variance is primarily due to a revision made in 2006 of transmission equalization receipts among entergy companies . the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to a revision in 2006 of reserve equalization payments among entergy companies due to a ferc ruling regarding the inclusion of interruptible loads in reserve .

Question: what percent of the change in revenue was due to volume/weather?
Answer: 35%
Calculation: divide(4.5, subtract(486.9, 466.1))
item 1a . risk factors in addition to the other information provided in this report , the following risk factors should be considered when evaluating an investment in our securities . if the circumstances contemplated by the individual risk factors materialize , our business , financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected and the trading price of our common shares could decline significantly . risks relating to our business fluctuations in the financial markets could result in investment losses . prolonged and severe disruptions in the overall public debt and equity markets , such as occurred during 2008 , could result in significant realized and unrealized losses in our investment portfolio . although financial markets have significantly improved since 2008 , they could deteriorate in the future . there could also be disruption in individual market sectors , such as occurred in the energy sector in recent years . such declines in the financial markets could result in significant realized and unrealized losses on investments and could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations , equity , business and insurer financial strength and debt ratings . our results could be adversely affected by catastrophic events . we are exposed to unpredictable catastrophic events , including weather-related and other natural catastrophes , as well as acts of terrorism . any material reduction in our operating results caused by the occurrence of one or more catastrophes could inhibit our ability to pay dividends or to meet our interest and principal payment obligations . by way of illustration , during the past five calendar years , pre-tax catastrophe losses , net of reinsurance , were as follows: .

Table: calendar year: pre-tax catastrophe losses ( dollars in millions ) 2017 $ 1472.6 2016 301.2 2015 53.8 2014 56.3 2013 194.0

our losses from future catastrophic events could exceed our projections . we use projections of possible losses from future catastrophic events of varying types and magnitudes as a strategic underwriting tool . we use these loss projections to estimate our potential catastrophe losses in certain geographic areas and decide on the placement of retrocessional coverage or other actions to limit the extent of potential losses in a given geographic area . these loss projections are approximations , reliant on a mix of quantitative and qualitative processes , and actual losses may exceed the projections by a material amount , resulting in a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. .

Question: what was the change pre-tax catastrophe losses from 2016 to 2017 in thousands
Answer: 1171.4
Calculation: subtract(1472.6, 301.2)
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) becton , dickinson and company ( b ) these reclassifications were recorded to interest expense and cost of products sold . additional details regarding the company's cash flow hedges are provided in note 13 . on august 25 , 2016 , in anticipation of proceeds to be received from the divestiture of the respiratory solutions business in the first quarter of fiscal year 2017 , the company entered into an accelerated share repurchase ( "asr" ) agreement . subsequent to the end of the company's fiscal year 2016 and as per the terms of the asr agreement , the company received approximately 1.3 million shares of its common stock , which was recorded as a $ 220 million increase to common stock in treasury . note 4 2014 earnings per share the weighted average common shares used in the computations of basic and diluted earnings per share ( shares in thousands ) for the years ended september 30 were as follows: .

Table: 2016 2015 2014 average common shares outstanding 212702 202537 193299 dilutive share equivalents from share-based plans 4834 4972 4410 average common and common equivalent shares outstanding 2014 assuming dilution 217536 207509 197709

average common and common equivalent shares outstanding 2014 assuming dilution 217536 207509 197709 upon closing the acquisition of carefusion corporation ( 201ccarefusion 201d ) on march 17 , 2015 , the company issued approximately 15.9 million of its common shares as part of the purchase consideration . additional disclosures regarding this acquisition are provided in note 9 . options to purchase shares of common stock are excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share when their inclusion would have an anti-dilutive effect on the calculation . for the years ended september 30 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 there were no options to purchase shares of common stock which were excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation. .

Question: as of september 30 ,2014 what was the percent of the total average common and common equivalent shares outstanding 2014 assuming dilution that was dilute share equivalents from share-based plans
Answer: 2.23%
Calculation: divide(4410, 197709)
company stock performance the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 composite index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology index . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 composite index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology index on september 30 , 2006 . data points on the graph are annual . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among apple inc. , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index and the dow jones us technology index sep-10sep-09sep-08sep-07sep-06 sep-11 apple inc . s&p 500 s&p computer hardware dow jones us technology *$ 100 invested on 9/30/06 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending september 30 . copyright a9 2011 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . copyright a9 2011 dow jones & co . all rights reserved . september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 .

Table: september 30 2006 september 30 2007 september 30 2008 september 30 2009 september 30 2010 september 30 2011 apple inc . $ 100 $ 199 $ 148 $ 241 $ 369 $ 495 s&p 500 $ 100 $ 116 $ 91 $ 85 $ 93 $ 94 s&p computer hardware $ 100 $ 148 $ 124 $ 147 $ 174 $ 197 dow jones us technology $ 100 $ 123 $ 94 $ 104 $ 117 $ 120

.

Question: what was the cumulative percentage return for the five years ended september 30 , 2011 for apple inc.?
Answer: 395%
Calculation: divide(subtract(495, 100), 100)
.

Table: years ended december 31 2018 2017 2016 statutory tax rate 19.0% ( 19.0 % ) 19.3% ( 19.3 % ) 20.0% ( 20.0 % ) u.s . state income taxes net of u.s . federal benefit -0.4 ( 0.4 ) -1.5 ( 1.5 ) 0.4 taxes on international operations ( 1 ) -7.3 ( 7.3 ) -30.3 ( 30.3 ) -12.2 ( 12.2 ) nondeductible expenses 2.7 3.4 1.4 adjustments to prior year tax requirements 0.9 2.0 -1.2 ( 1.2 ) adjustments to valuation allowances 3.8 -1.8 ( 1.8 ) -2.2 ( 2.2 ) change in uncertain tax positions 0.9 1.6 3.2 excess tax benefits related to shared based compensation ( 2 ) -3.6 ( 3.6 ) -8.0 ( 8.0 ) 2014 u.s . tax reform impact ( 3 ) 7.1 51.2 2014 loss on disposition -10.2 ( 10.2 ) 2014 2014 other 2014 net -1.2 ( 1.2 ) 0.6 1.2 effective tax rate 11.7% ( 11.7 % ) 36.5% ( 36.5 % ) 10.6% ( 10.6 % )

( 1 ) the company determines the adjustment for taxes on international operations based on the difference between the statutory tax rate applicable to earnings in each foreign jurisdiction and the enacted rate of 19.0% ( 19.0 % ) , 19.3% ( 19.3 % ) and 20.0% ( 20.0 % ) at december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , respectively . the benefit to the company 2019s effective income tax rate from taxes on international operations relates to benefits from lower-taxed global operations , primarily due to the use of global funding structures and the tax holiday in singapore . the impact decreased from 2017 to 2018 primarily as a result of the decrease in the u.s . federal tax ( 2 ) with the adoption of asu 2016-09 in 2017 , excess tax benefits and deficiencies from share-based payment transactions are recognized as income tax expense or benefit in the company 2019s consolidated statements of income . ( 3 ) the impact of the tax reform act including the transition tax , the re-measurement of u.s . deferred tax assets and liabilities from 35% ( 35 % ) to 21% ( 21 % ) , withholding tax accruals , and the allocation of tax benefit between continuing operations and discontinued operations related to utilization of foreign tax credits. .

Question: what is the difference between the statutory tax rate and the effective tax rate for international operations in 2018?
Answer: 17.2%
Calculation: subtract(36.5%, 19.3%)
marathon oil corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( g ) this obligation relates to a lease of equipment at united states steel 2019s clairton works cokemaking facility in pennsylvania . we are the primary obligor under this lease . under the financial matters agreement , united states steel has assumed responsibility for all obligations under this lease . this lease is an amortizing financing with a final maturity of 2012 . ( h ) these notes are senior secured notes of marathon oil canada corporation . the notes are secured by substantially all of marathon oil canada corporation 2019s assets . in january 2008 , we provided a full and unconditional guarantee covering the payment of all principal and interest due under the senior notes . ( i ) these obligations as of december 31 , 2009 include $ 36 million related to assets under construction at that date for which a capital lease will commence upon completion of construction . the amounts currently reported are based upon the percent of construction completed as of december 31 , 2009 and therefore do not reflect future minimum lease obligations of $ 164 million related to the asset . ( j ) payments of long-term debt for the years 2010 - 2014 are $ 102 million , $ 246 million , $ 1492 million , $ 287 million and $ 802 million . united steel is due to pay $ 17 million in 2010 , $ 161 million in 2011 , $ 19 million in 2012 , and $ 11 for year 2014 . ( k ) in the event of a change in control , as defined in the related agreements , debt obligations totaling $ 662 million at december 31 , 2009 , may be declared immediately due and payable . ( l ) see note 16 for information on interest rate swaps . 20 . asset retirement obligations the following summarizes the changes in asset retirement obligations : ( in millions ) 2009 2008 .

Table: ( in millions ) 2009 2008 asset retirement obligations as of january 1 $ 965 $ 1134 liabilities incurred including acquisitions 14 30 liabilities settled -65 ( 65 ) -94 ( 94 ) accretion expense ( included in depreciation depletion and amortization ) 64 66 revisions to previous estimates 124 24 held for sale - -195 ( 195 ) asset retirement obligations as of december 31 ( a ) $ 1102 $ 965

asset retirement obligations as of december 31 ( a ) $ 1102 $ 965 ( a ) includes asset retirement obligation of $ 3 and $ 2 million classified as short-term at december 31 , 2009 , and 2008. .

Question: by what percentage did asset retirement obligations increase from 2008 to 2009?
Answer: 14.2%
Calculation: divide(subtract(1102, 965), 965)
a valuation allowance is provided against deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized . changes to our valuation allowance during the year ended december 31 , 2017 , the 2016 fiscal transition period and the years ended may 31 , 2016 and 2015 are summarized below ( in thousands ) : .

Table: balance at may 31 2014 $ -7199 ( 7199 ) utilization of foreign net operating loss carryforwards 3387 other -11 ( 11 ) balance at may 31 2015 -3823 ( 3823 ) allowance for foreign income tax credit carryforward -7140 ( 7140 ) allowance for domestic net operating loss carryforwards -4474 ( 4474 ) allowance for domestic net unrealized capital loss -1526 ( 1526 ) release of allowance of domestic capital loss carryforward 1746 other 98 balance at may 31 2016 -15119 ( 15119 ) allowance for domestic net operating loss carryforwards -1504 ( 1504 ) release of allowance of domestic net unrealized capital loss 12 balance at december 31 2016 -16611 ( 16611 ) allowance for foreign net operating loss carryforwards -6469 ( 6469 ) allowance for domestic net operating loss carryforwards -3793 ( 3793 ) allowance for state credit carryforwards -685 ( 685 ) rate change on domestic net operating loss and capital loss carryforwards 3868 utilization of foreign income tax credit carryforward 7140 balance at december 31 2017 $ -16550 ( 16550 )

the increase in the valuation allowance related to net operating loss carryforwards of $ 10.3 million for the year ended december 31 , 2017 relates primarily to carryforward assets recorded as part of the acquisition of active network . the increase in the valuation allowance related to domestic net operating loss carryforwards of $ 1.5 million and $ 4.5 million for the 2016 fiscal transition period and the year ended may 31 , 2016 , respectively , relates to acquired carryforwards from the merger with heartland . foreign net operating loss carryforwards of $ 43.2 million and domestic net operating loss carryforwards of $ 28.9 million at december 31 , 2017 will expire between december 31 , 2026 and december 31 , 2037 if not utilized . we conduct business globally and file income tax returns in the domestic federal jurisdiction and various state and foreign jurisdictions . in the normal course of business , we are subject to examination by taxing authorities around the world . we are no longer subjected to state income tax examinations for years ended on or before may 31 , 2008 , u.s . federal income tax examinations for years ended on or before december 31 , 2013 and u.k . federal income tax examinations for years ended on or before may 31 , 2014 . 88 2013 global payments inc . | 2017 form 10-k annual report .

Question: what was the net change in the valuation allowance in thousands between 2014 and 2015?
Answer: 3376
Calculation: subtract(-3823, -7199)
properties 51vornado realty trust industrial properties our dry warehouse/industrial properties consist of seven buildings in new jersey containing approximately 1.5 million square feet . the properties are encumbered by two cross-collateralized mortgage loans aggregating $ 47179000 as of december 31 , 2006 . average lease terms range from three to five years . the following table sets forth the occupancy rate and average annual rent per square foot at the end of each of the past five years . average annual occupancy rent per as of december 31 , rate square foot .

Table: as of december 31, occupancy rate average annual rent per square foot 2006 96.9% ( 96.9 % ) $ 4.17 2005 100.0% ( 100.0 % ) 4.19 2004 88.0% ( 88.0 % ) 3.96 2003 88.0% ( 88.0 % ) 3.86 2002 100.0% ( 100.0 % ) 3.89

220 central park south , new york city we own a 90% ( 90 % ) interest in 220 central park south . the property contains 122 rental apartments with an aggregate of 133000 square feet and 5700 square feet of commercial space . on november 7 , 2006 , we completed a $ 130000000 refinancing of the property . the loan has two tranches : the first tranche of $ 95000000 bears interest at libor ( capped at 5.50% ( 5.50 % ) ) plus 2.35% ( 2.35 % ) ( 7.70% ( 7.70 % ) as of december 31 , 2006 ) and the second tranche can be drawn up to $ 35000000 and bears interest at libor ( capped at 5.50% ( 5.50 % ) ) plus 2.45% ( 2.45 % ) ( 7.80% ( 7.80 % ) as of december 31 , 2006 ) . as of december 31 , 2006 , approximately $ 27990000 has been drawn on the second tranche . 40 east 66th street , new york city 40 east 66th street , located at madison avenue and east 66th street , contains 37 rental apartments with an aggregate of 85000 square feet , and 10000 square feet of retail space . the rental apartment operations are included in our other segment and the retail operations are included in the retail segment. .

Question: average annual rent per square foot changed in 2005 from 2004 by what amount?
Answer: 0.23
Calculation: multiply(4.19, 3.96)
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements the valuation allowance increased from $ 47.8 million as of december 31 , 2009 to $ 48.2 million as of december 31 , 2010 . the increase was primarily due to valuation allowances on foreign loss carryforwards . at december 31 , 2010 , the company has provided a valuation allowance of approximately $ 48.2 million which primarily relates to state net operating loss carryforwards , equity investments and foreign items . the company has not provided a valuation allowance for the remaining deferred tax assets , primarily its federal net operating loss carryforwards , as management believes the company will have sufficient taxable income to realize these federal net operating loss carryforwards during the twenty-year tax carryforward period . valuation allowances may be reversed if related deferred tax assets are deemed realizable based on changes in facts and circumstances relevant to the assets 2019 recoverability . the recoverability of the company 2019s remaining net deferred tax asset has been assessed utilizing projections based on its current operations . the projections show a significant decrease in depreciation in the later years of the carryforward period as a result of a significant portion of its assets being fully depreciated during the first fifteen years of the carryforward period . accordingly , the recoverability of the net deferred tax asset is not dependent on material improvements to operations , material asset sales or other non-routine transactions . based on its current outlook of future taxable income during the carryforward period , management believes that the net deferred tax asset will be realized . the company 2019s deferred tax assets as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 in the table above do not include $ 122.1 million and $ 113.9 million , respectively , of excess tax benefits from the exercises of employee stock options that are a component of net operating losses . total stockholders 2019 equity as of december 31 , 2010 will be increased by $ 122.1 million if and when any such excess tax benefits are ultimately realized . at december 31 , 2010 , the company had net federal and state operating loss carryforwards available to reduce future federal and state taxable income of approximately $ 1.2 billion , including losses related to employee stock options of $ 0.3 billion . if not utilized , the company 2019s net operating loss carryforwards expire as follows ( in thousands ) : .

Table: years ended december 31, federal state foreign 2011 to 2015 $ 2014 $ 2014 $ 503 2016 to 2020 2014 331315 5509 2021 to 2025 774209 576780 2014 2026 to 2030 423398 279908 92412 total $ 1197607 $ 1188003 $ 98424

in addition , the company has mexican tax credits of $ 5.2 million which if not utilized would expire in 2017. .

Question: what is the total net operating loss carryforwards?
Answer: 2484034
Calculation: add(add(1197607, 1188003), 98424)