bevaya/FinQA huggingface dataset:
december 18 , 2007 , we issued an additional 23182197 shares of common stock to citadel . the issuances were exempt from registration pursuant to section 4 ( 2 ) of the securities act of 1933 , and each purchaser has represented to us that it is an 201caccredited investor 201d as defined in regulation d promulgated under the securities act of 1933 , and that the common stock was being acquired for investment . we did not engage in a general solicitation or advertising with regard to the issuances of the common stock and have not offered securities to the public in connection with the issuances . see item 1 . business 2014citadel investment . performance graph the following performance graph shows the cumulative total return to a holder of the company 2019s common stock , assuming dividend reinvestment , compared with the cumulative total return , assuming dividend reinvestment , of the standard & poor 2019s ( 201cs&p 201d ) 500 and the s&p super cap diversified financials during the period from december 31 , 2002 through december 31 , 2007. .

Table: 12/02 12/03 12/04 12/05 12/06 12/07 e*trade financial corporation 100.00 260.29 307.61 429.22 461.32 73.05 s&p 500 100.00 128.68 142.69 149.70 173.34 182.87 s&p super cap diversified financials 100.00 139.29 156.28 170.89 211.13 176.62

2022 $ 100 invested on 12/31/02 in stock or index-including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending december 31 . 2022 copyright a9 2008 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc . all rights reserved . www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm .

Question: what was the difference in percentage cumulative total return between e*trade financial corporation and s&p super cap diversified financials for the five years ended 12/07?
Answer: 103.57%
Calculation: subtract(divide(subtract(73.05, const_100), const_100), divide(subtract(176.62, const_100), const_100))
the contractual maturities of held-to-maturity securities as of january 30 , 2009 were in excess of three years and were $ 31.4 million at cost and $ 28.9 million at fair value , respectively . for the successor year ended january 30 , 2009 and period ended february 1 , 2008 , and the predecessor period ended july 6 , 2007 and year ended february 2 , 2007 , gross realized gains and losses on the sales of available-for-sale securities were not material . the cost of securities sold is based upon the specific identification method . merchandise inventories inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market with cost determined using the retail last-in , first-out ( 201clifo 201d ) method . under the company 2019s retail inventory method ( 201crim 201d ) , the calculation of gross profit and the resulting valuation of inventories at cost are computed by applying a calculated cost-to-retail inventory ratio to the retail value of sales at a department level . costs directly associated with warehousing and distribution are capitalized into inventory . the excess of current cost over lifo cost was approximately $ 50.0 million at january 30 , 2009 and $ 6.1 million at february 1 , 2008 . current cost is determined using the retail first-in , first-out method . the company 2019s lifo reserves were adjusted to zero at july 6 , 2007 as a result of the merger . the successor recorded lifo provisions of $ 43.9 million and $ 6.1 million during 2008 and 2007 , respectively . the predecessor recorded a lifo credit of $ 1.5 million in 2006 . in 2008 , the increased commodity cost pressures mainly related to food and pet products which have been driven by fruit and vegetable prices and rising freight costs . increases in petroleum , resin , metals , pulp and other raw material commodity driven costs also resulted in multiple product cost increases . the company intends to address these commodity cost increases through negotiations with its vendors and by increasing retail prices as necessary . on a quarterly basis , the company estimates the annual impact of commodity cost fluctuations based upon the best available information at that point in time . store pre-opening costs pre-opening costs related to new store openings and the construction periods are expensed as incurred . property and equipment property and equipment are recorded at cost . the company provides for depreciation and amortization on a straight-line basis over the following estimated useful lives: .

Table: land improvements 20 buildings 39-40 furniture fixtures and equipment 3-10

improvements of leased properties are amortized over the shorter of the life of the applicable lease term or the estimated useful life of the asset. .

Question: what was the percentage change in the excess of current cost over lifo cost from 2008 to 2009 .
Answer: 720%
Calculation: subtract(50.0, 6.1)
Explanation: the percentage change is the change from the recent to the most recent divide by the recent
subject to fluctuation and , consequently , the amount realized in the subsequent sale of an investment may differ significantly from its current reported value . fluctuations in the market price of a security may result from perceived changes in the underlying economic characteristics of the issuer , the relative price of alternative investments and general market conditions . the table below summarizes equity investments that are subject to equity price fluctuations at december 31 , 2012 . equity investments are included in other assets in our consolidated balance sheets . ( in millions ) carrying unrealized net of tax .

Table: ( in millions ) costbasis fairvalue carryingvalue unrealizedgainnet of tax bm&fbovespa s.a . $ 262.9 $ 690.6 $ 690.6 $ 271.4 bolsa mexicana de valores s.a.b . de c.v . 17.3 29.3 29.3 7.6 imarex asa 2014 1.8 1.8 1.1

we do not currently hedge against equity price risk . equity investments are assessed for other-than- temporary impairment on a quarterly basis. .

Question: in 2012 what was the ratio of the bm&fbovespa s.a . fair value to the cost basis
Answer: 2.63
Calculation: add(690.6, 262.9)
a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits , for the periods indicated , is as follows: .

Table: ( dollars in thousands ) 2010 2009 2008 balance at january 1 $ 29010 $ 34366 $ 29132 additions based on tax positions related to the current year 7119 6997 5234 additions for tax positions of prior years - - - reductions for tax positions of prior years - - - settlements with taxing authorities -12356 ( 12356 ) -12353 ( 12353 ) - lapses of applicable statutes of limitations - - - balance at december 31 $ 23773 $ 29010 $ 34366

the entire amount of the unrecognized tax benefits would affect the effective tax rate if recognized . in 2010 , the company favorably settled a 2003 and 2004 irs audit . the company recorded a net overall tax benefit including accrued interest of $ 25920 thousand . in addition , the company was also able to take down a $ 12356 thousand fin 48 reserve that had been established regarding the 2003 and 2004 irs audit . the company is no longer subject to u.s . federal , state and local or foreign income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2007 . the company recognizes accrued interest related to net unrecognized tax benefits and penalties in income taxes . during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , the company accrued and recognized a net expense ( benefit ) of approximately $ ( 9938 ) thousand , $ 1563 thousand and $ 2446 thousand , respectively , in interest and penalties . included within the 2010 net expense ( benefit ) of $ ( 9938 ) thousand is $ ( 10591 ) thousand of accrued interest related to the 2003 and 2004 irs audit . the company is not aware of any positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly increase or decrease within twelve months of the reporting date . for u.s . income tax purposes the company has foreign tax credit carryforwards of $ 55026 thousand that begin to expire in 2014 . in addition , for u.s . income tax purposes the company has $ 41693 thousand of alternative minimum tax credits that do not expire . management believes that it is more likely than not that the company will realize the benefits of its net deferred tax assets and , accordingly , no valuation allowance has been recorded for the periods presented . tax benefits of $ 629 thousand and $ 1714 thousand related to share-based compensation deductions for stock options exercised in 2010 and 2009 , respectively , are included within additional paid-in capital of the shareholders 2019 equity section of the consolidated balance sheets. .

Question: what was the percent change in net expense in interest and penalties between 2008 and 2009?
Answer: -36%
Calculation: divide(subtract(1563, 2446), 2446)
five-year performance comparison 2013 the following graph provides an indicator of cumulative total shareholder returns for the corporation as compared to the peer group index ( described above ) , the dj trans , and the s&p 500 . the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested in the common stock of union pacific corporation and each index on december 31 , 2010 and that all dividends were reinvested . the information below is historical in nature and is not necessarily indicative of future performance . purchases of equity securities 2013 during 2015 , we repurchased 36921641 shares of our common stock at an average price of $ 99.16 . the following table presents common stock repurchases during each month for the fourth quarter of 2015 : period total number of shares purchased [a] average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announced plan or program [b] maximum number of shares remaining under the plan or program [b] .

Table: period total number of shares purchased [a] average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announcedplan or program [b] maximum number of shares remaining under the plan or program [b] oct . 1 through oct . 31 3247731 $ 92.98 3221153 56078192 nov . 1 through nov . 30 2325865 86.61 2322992 53755200 dec . 1 through dec . 31 1105389 77.63 1102754 52652446 total 6678985 $ 88.22 6646899 n/a

[a] total number of shares purchased during the quarter includes approximately 32086 shares delivered or attested to upc by employees to pay stock option exercise prices , satisfy excess tax withholding obligations for stock option exercises or vesting of retention units , and pay withholding obligations for vesting of retention shares . [b] effective january 1 , 2014 , our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to 120 million shares of our common stock by december 31 , 2017 . these repurchases may be made on the open market or through other transactions . our management has sole discretion with respect to determining the timing and amount of these transactions. .

Question: for the fourth quarter ended december 31 , 2015 what was the percent of the total number of shares purchased in november
Answer: 34.83%
Calculation: divide(2325865, 6678985)
shareholder return performance presentation the graph presented below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on state street's common stock to the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over a five-year period . the cumulative total shareholder return assumes the investment of $ 100 in state street common stock and in each index on december 31 , 2007 at the closing price on the last trading day of 2007 , and also assumes reinvestment of common stock dividends . the s&p financial index is a publicly available measure of 80 of the standard & poor's 500 companies , representing 26 diversified financial services companies , 22 insurance companies , 17 real estate companies and 15 banking companies . comparison of five-year cumulative total shareholder return .

Table: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 state street corporation $ 100 $ 49 $ 55 $ 58 $ 52 $ 61 s&p 500 index 100 63 80 92 94 109 s&p financial index 100 45 52 59 49 63

.

Question: what is the percent change in state street corporation's cumulative total shareholder return on common stock between 2008 and 2009?
Answer: -11%
Calculation: divide(subtract(55, 49), 49)
table of contents the foreign provision for income taxes is based on foreign pre-tax earnings of $ 33.6 billion , $ 30.5 billion and $ 36.8 billion in 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively . the company 2019s consolidated financial statements provide for any related tax liability on undistributed earnings that the company does not intend to be indefinitely reinvested outside the u.s . substantially all of the company 2019s undistributed international earnings intended to be indefinitely reinvested in operations outside the u.s . were generated by subsidiaries organized in ireland , which has a statutory tax rate of 12.5% ( 12.5 % ) . as of september 27 , 2014 , u.s . income taxes have not been provided on a cumulative total of $ 69.7 billion of such earnings . the amount of unrecognized deferred tax liability related to these temporary differences is estimated to be approximately $ 23.3 billion . as of september 27 , 2014 and september 28 , 2013 , $ 137.1 billion and $ 111.3 billion , respectively , of the company 2019s cash , cash equivalents and marketable securities were held by foreign subsidiaries and are generally based in u.s . dollar-denominated holdings . amounts held by foreign subsidiaries are generally subject to u.s . income taxation on repatriation to the u.s . a reconciliation of the provision for income taxes , with the amount computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate ( 35% ( 35 % ) in 2014 , 2013 and 2012 ) to income before provision for income taxes for 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , is as follows ( dollars in millions ) : the company 2019s income taxes payable have been reduced by the tax benefits from employee stock plan awards . for stock options , the company receives an income tax benefit calculated as the tax effect of the difference between the fair market value of the stock issued at the time of the exercise and the exercise price . for rsus , the company receives an income tax benefit upon the award 2019s vesting equal to the tax effect of the underlying stock 2019s fair market value . the company had net excess tax benefits from equity awards of $ 706 million , $ 643 million and $ 1.4 billion in 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively , which were reflected as increases to common stock . apple inc . | 2014 form 10-k | 64 .

Table: 2014 2013 2012 computed expected tax $ 18719 $ 17554 $ 19517 state taxes net of federal effect 469 508 677 indefinitely invested earnings of foreign subsidiaries -4744 ( 4744 ) -4614 ( 4614 ) -5895 ( 5895 ) research and development credit net -88 ( 88 ) -287 ( 287 ) -103 ( 103 ) domestic production activities deduction -495 ( 495 ) -308 ( 308 ) -328 ( 328 ) other 112 265 162 provision for income taxes $ 13973 $ 13118 $ 14030 effective tax rate 26.1% ( 26.1 % ) 26.2% ( 26.2 % ) 25.2% ( 25.2 % )

.

Question: what was the highest effective tax rate , as a percentage?
Answer: 26.2
Calculation: table_max(effective tax rate, none)
remitted to the u.s . due to foreign tax credits and exclusions that may become available at the time of remittance . at december 31 , 2010 , aon had domestic federal operating loss carryforwards of $ 56 million that will expire at various dates from 2011 to 2024 , state operating loss carryforwards of $ 610 million that will expire at various dates from 2011 to 2031 , and foreign operating and capital loss carryforwards of $ 720 million and $ 251 million , respectively , nearly all of which are subject to indefinite carryforward . unrecognized tax provisions the following is a reconciliation of the company 2019s beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits ( in millions ) : .

Table: 2010 2009 balance at january 1 $ 77 $ 86 additions based on tax positions related to the current year 7 2 additions for tax positions of prior years 4 5 reductions for tax positions of prior years -7 ( 7 ) -11 ( 11 ) settlements -1 ( 1 ) -10 ( 10 ) lapse of statute of limitations -5 ( 5 ) -3 ( 3 ) acquisitions 26 6 foreign currency translation -1 ( 1 ) 2 balance at december 31 $ 100 $ 77

as of december 31 , 2010 , $ 85 million of unrecognized tax benefits would impact the effective tax rate if recognized . aon does not expect the unrecognized tax positions to change significantly over the next twelve months , except for a potential reduction of unrecognized tax benefits in the range of $ 10-$ 15 million relating to anticipated audit settlements . the company recognizes penalties and interest related to unrecognized income tax benefits in its provision for income taxes . aon accrued potential penalties of less than $ 1 million during each of 2010 , 2009 and 2008 . aon accrued interest of less than $ 1 million in 2010 , $ 2 million during 2009 and less than $ 1 million in 2008 . aon has recorded a liability for penalties of $ 5 million and for interest of $ 18 million for both december 31 , 2010 and 2009 . aon and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the u.s . federal jurisdiction as well as various state and international jurisdictions . aon has substantially concluded all u.s . federal income tax matters for years through 2006 . material u.s . state and local income tax jurisdiction examinations have been concluded for years through 2002 . aon has concluded income tax examinations in its primary international jurisdictions through 2004. .

Question: what was the average accrued interest by aon from 2009 to 2010 in millions
Answer: 1.5
Calculation: divide(add(add(1, 2), 2), const_2)
entergy gulf states , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis .

Table: ( in millions ) 2002 net revenue $ 1130.7 volume/weather 17.8 fuel write-offs in 2002 15.3 net wholesale revenue 10.2 base rate decreases -23.3 ( 23.3 ) nisco gain recognized in 2002 -15.2 ( 15.2 ) rate refund provisions -11.3 ( 11.3 ) other -14.1 ( 14.1 ) 2003 net revenue $ 1110.1

the volume/weather variance was due to higher electric sales volume in the service territory . billed usage increased a total of 517 gwh in the residential and commercial sectors . the increase was partially offset by a decrease in industrial usage of 470 gwh due to the loss of two large industrial customers to cogeneration . the customers accounted for approximately 1% ( 1 % ) of entergy gulf states' net revenue in 2002 . in 2002 , deferred fuel costs of $ 8.9 million related to a texas fuel reconciliation case were written off and $ 6.5 million in expense resulted from an adjustment in the deregulated asset plan percentage as the result of a power uprate at river bend . the increase in net wholesale revenue was primarily due to an increase in sales volume to municipal and co- op customers and also to affiliated systems related to entergy's generation resource planning . the base rate decreases were effective june 2002 and january 2003 , both in the louisiana jurisdiction . the january 2003 base rate decrease of $ 22.1 million had a minimal impact on net income due to a corresponding reduction in nuclear depreciation and decommissioning expenses associated with the change in accounting to reflect an assumed extension of river bend's useful life . in 2002 , a gain of $ 15.2 million was recognized for the louisiana portion of the 1988 nelson units 1 and 2 sale . entergy gulf states received approval from the lpsc to discontinue applying amortization of the gain against recoverable fuel , resulting in the recognition of the deferred gain in income . rate refund provisions caused a decrease in net revenue due to additional provisions recorded in 2003 compared to 2002 for potential rate actions and refunds . gross operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 440.2 million in fuel cost recovery revenues as a result of higher fuel rates in both the louisiana and texas jurisdictions . fuel and purchased power expenses increased $ 471.1 million due to an increase in the market prices of natural gas and purchased power . other income statement variances 2004 compared to 2003 other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to : 2022 voluntary severance program accruals of $ 22.5 million in 2003 ; and 2022 a decrease of $ 4.3 million in nuclear material and labor costs due to reduced staff in 2004. .

Question: what were are the deferred fuel costs as a percentage of the total fuel write-offs in 2002?
Answer: 58.2%
Calculation: divide(8.9, 15.3)
notes to consolidated financial statements at december 31 , 2007 , future minimum rental payments required under operating leases for continuing operations that have initial or remaining noncancelable lease terms in excess of one year , net of sublease rental income , most of which pertain to real estate leases , are as follows : ( millions ) .

Table: 2008 $ 317 2009 275 2010 236 2011 214 2012 191 later years 597 total minimum payments required $ 1830

aon corporation .

Question: assuming that actual net rent expense will be the same as presented in the table , what would be the growth rate in the net rent expense from 2008 to 2009?
Answer: -13.2%
Calculation: divide(subtract(275, 317), 317)
entergy louisiana , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis setting any of entergy louisiana's rates . therefore , to the extent entergy louisiana's use of the proceeds would ordinarily have reduced its rate base , no change in rate base shall be reflected for ratemaking purposes . the sec approval for additional return of equity capital is now expired . entergy louisiana's receivables from or ( payables to ) the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years: .

Table: 2004 2003 2002 2001 ( in thousands ) ( in thousands ) ( in thousands ) ( in thousands ) $ 40549 ( $ 41317 ) $ 18854 $ 3812

money pool activity used $ 81.9 million of entergy louisiana's operating cash flow in 2004 , provided $ 60.2 million in 2003 , and used $ 15.0 million in 2002 . see note 4 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements for a description of the money pool . investing activities the decrease of $ 25.1 million in net cash used by investing activities in 2004 was primarily due to decreased spending on customer service projects , partially offset by increases in spending on transmission projects and fossil plant projects . the increase of $ 56.0 million in net cash used by investing activities in 2003 was primarily due to increased spending on customer service , transmission , and nuclear projects . financing activities the decrease of $ 404.4 million in net cash used by financing activities in 2004 was primarily due to : 2022 the net issuance of $ 98.0 million of long-term debt in 2004 compared to the retirement of $ 261.0 million in 2022 a principal payment of $ 14.8 million in 2004 for the waterford lease obligation compared to a principal payment of $ 35.4 million in 2003 ; and 2022 a decrease of $ 29.0 million in common stock dividends paid . the decrease of $ 105.5 million in net cash used by financing activities in 2003 was primarily due to : 2022 a decrease of $ 125.9 million in common stock dividends paid ; and 2022 the repurchase of $ 120 million of common stock from entergy corporation in 2002 . the decrease in net cash used in 2003 was partially offset by the following : 2022 the retirement in 2003 of $ 150 million of 8.5% ( 8.5 % ) series first mortgage bonds compared to the net retirement of $ 134.6 million of first mortgage bonds in 2002 ; and 2022 principal payments of $ 35.4 million in 2003 for the waterford 3 lease obligation compared to principal payments of $ 15.9 million in 2002 . see note 5 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements for details of long-term debt . uses of capital entergy louisiana requires capital resources for : 2022 construction and other capital investments ; 2022 debt and preferred stock maturities ; 2022 working capital purposes , including the financing of fuel and purchased power costs ; and 2022 dividend and interest payments. .

Question: what is the the net issuance of long-term debt as a percentage of the decrease in net cash used by financing activities in 2004?
Answer: 24.2%
Calculation: divide(98.0, 404.4)