bevaya/FinQA huggingface dataset:
jpmorgan chase & co./2015 annual report 233 note 11 2013 noninterest expense for details on noninterest expense , see consolidated statements of income on page 176 . included within other expense is the following : year ended december 31 , ( in millions ) 2015 2014 2013 .

Table: year ended december 31 ( in millions ) 2015 2014 2013 legal expense $ 2969 $ 2883 $ 11143 federal deposit insurance corporation-related ( 201cfdic 201d ) expense 1227 1037 1496

federal deposit insurance corporation-related ( 201cfdic 201d ) expense 1227 1037 1496 note 12 2013 securities securities are classified as trading , afs or held-to-maturity ( 201chtm 201d ) . securities classified as trading assets are discussed in note 3 . predominantly all of the firm 2019s afs and htm investment securities ( the 201cinvestment securities portfolio 201d ) are held by treasury and cio in connection with its asset-liability management objectives . at december 31 , 2015 , the investment securities portfolio consisted of debt securities with an average credit rating of aa+ ( based upon external ratings where available , and where not available , based primarily upon internal ratings which correspond to ratings as defined by s&p and moody 2019s ) . afs securities are carried at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets . unrealized gains and losses , after any applicable hedge accounting adjustments , are reported as net increases or decreases to accumulated other comprehensive income/ ( loss ) . the specific identification method is used to determine realized gains and losses on afs securities , which are included in securities gains/ ( losses ) on the consolidated statements of income . htm debt securities , which management has the intent and ability to hold until maturity , are carried at amortized cost on the consolidated balance sheets . for both afs and htm debt securities , purchase discounts or premiums are generally amortized into interest income over the contractual life of the security . during 2014 , the firm transferred u.s . government agency mortgage-backed securities and obligations of u.s . states and municipalities with a fair value of $ 19.3 billion from afs to htm . these securities were transferred at fair value , and the transfer was a non-cash transaction . aoci included net pretax unrealized losses of $ 9 million on the securities at the date of transfer . the transfer reflected the firm 2019s intent to hold the securities to maturity in order to reduce the impact of price volatility on aoci and certain capital measures under basel iii. .

Question: what was the minimum legal expense in the past three years?
Answer: 2883
Calculation: table_min(legal expense, none)
entergy gulf states , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis .

Table: ( in millions ) 2003 net revenue $ 1110.1 volume/weather 26.7 net wholesale revenue 13.0 summer capacity charges 5.5 price applied to unbilled sales 4.8 fuel recovery revenues -14.2 ( 14.2 ) other 3.9 2004 net revenue $ 1149.8

the volume/weather variance resulted primarily from an increase of 1179 gwh in electricity usage in the industrial sector . billed usage also increased a total of 291 gwh in the residential , commercial , and governmental sectors . the increase in net wholesale revenue is primarily due to an increase in sales volume to municipal and co-op customers . summer capacity charges variance is due to the amortization in 2003 of deferred capacity charges for the summer of 2001 compared to the absence of the amortization in 2004 . the amortization of these capacity charges began in june 2002 and ended in may 2003 . the price applied to unbilled sales variance resulted primarily from an increase in the fuel price applied to unbilled sales . fuel recovery revenues represent an under-recovery of fuel charges that are recovered in base rates . entergy gulf states recorded $ 22.6 million of provisions in 2004 for potential rate refunds . these provisions are not included in the net revenue table above because they are more than offset by provisions recorded in 2003 . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory credits gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 187.8 million in fuel cost recovery revenues as a result of higher fuel rates in both the louisiana and texas jurisdictions . the increases in volume/weather and wholesale revenue , discussed above , also contributed to the increase . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to : 2022 increased recovery of deferred fuel costs due to higher fuel rates ; 2022 increases in the market prices of natural gas , coal , and purchased power ; and 2022 an increase in electricity usage , discussed above . other regulatory credits increased primarily due to the amortization in 2003 of deferred capacity charges for the summer of 2001 compared to the absence of amortization in 2004 . the amortization of these charges began in june 2002 and ended in may 2003 . 2003 compared to 2002 net revenue , which is entergy gulf states' measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2003 to 2002. .

Question: what portion of the net change in net revenue during 2004 is due to the change in volume/weather for entergy gulf states , inc?
Answer: 67.3%
Calculation: divide(26.7, subtract(1149.8, 1110.1))
the table below summarizes activity of rsus with performance conditions for the year ended december 31 , shares ( in thousands ) weighted average grant date fair value ( per share ) .

Table: shares ( in thousands ) weightedaverage grantdate fair value ( per share ) non-vested total as of december 31 2016 309 $ 55.94 granted 186 63.10 vested -204 ( 204 ) 46.10 forfeited -10 ( 10 ) 70.50 non-vested total as of december 31 2017 281 $ 67.33

as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to the nonvested rsus , with and without performance conditions , is expected to be recognized over the weighted-average remaining life of 1.5 years . the total fair value of rsus , with and without performance conditions , vested was $ 16 million , $ 14 million and $ 12 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . if dividends are paid with respect to shares of the company 2019s common stock before the rsus are distributed , the company credits a liability for the value of the dividends that would have been paid if the rsus were shares of company common stock . when the rsus are distributed , the company pays the participant a lump sum cash payment equal to the value of the dividend equivalents accrued . the company accrued dividend equivalents totaling less than $ 1 million , $ 1 million and $ 1 million to accumulated deficit in the accompanying consolidated statements of changes in stockholders 2019 equity for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . employee stock purchase plan the company maintains a nonqualified employee stock purchase plan ( the 201cespp 201d ) through which employee participants may use payroll deductions to acquire company common stock at the lesser of 90% ( 90 % ) of the fair market value of the common stock at either the beginning or the end of a three-month purchase period . on february 15 , 2017 , the board adopted the american water works company , inc . and its designated subsidiaries 2017 nonqualified employee stock purchase plan , which was approved by stockholders on may 12 , 2017 and took effect on august 5 , 2017 . the prior plan was terminated as to new purchases of company stock effective august 31 , 2017 . as of december 31 , 2017 , there were 2.0 million shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the espp . the espp is considered compensatory . during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , the company issued 93 thousand , 93 thousand and 98 thousand shares , respectively , under the espp. .

Question: as of december 31 , 2017 what was the percent of shares forfeited
Answer: 3.6%
Calculation: divide(const_10, 281)
incentive compensation cost the following table shows components of compensation expense , relating to certain of the incentive compensation programs described above : in a0millions a0of a0dollars 2018 2017 2016 charges for estimated awards to retirement-eligible employees $ 669 $ 659 $ 555 amortization of deferred cash awards , deferred cash stock units and performance stock units 202 354 336 immediately vested stock award expense ( 1 ) 75 70 73 amortization of restricted and deferred stock awards ( 2 ) 435 474 509 .

Table: in millions of dollars 2018 2017 2016 charges for estimated awards to retirement-eligible employees $ 669 $ 659 $ 555 amortization of deferred cash awards deferred cash stock units and performance stock units 202 354 336 immediately vested stock award expense ( 1 ) 75 70 73 amortization of restricted and deferred stock awards ( 2 ) 435 474 509 other variable incentive compensation 640 694 710 total $ 2021 $ 2251 $ 2183

( 1 ) represents expense for immediately vested stock awards that generally were stock payments in lieu of cash compensation . the expense is generally accrued as cash incentive compensation in the year prior to grant . ( 2 ) all periods include amortization expense for all unvested awards to non-retirement-eligible employees. .

Question: what percentage of total compensation expense in 2017 is composed of other variable incentive compensation?
Answer: 31%
Calculation: divide(694, 2251)
jpmorgan chase & co./2017 annual report 39 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co . ( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index . the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced equity benchmark in the united states of america ( 201cu.s . 201d ) , consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s . and is composed of leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts . the s&p financial index is an index of financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 . the firm is a component of all three industry indices . the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2012 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices . the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested . december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 .

Table: december 31 ( in dollars ) 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 jpmorgan chase $ 100.00 $ 136.71 $ 150.22 $ 162.79 $ 219.06 $ 277.62 kbw bank index 100.00 137.76 150.66 151.39 194.55 230.72 s&p financial index 100.00 135.59 156.17 153.72 188.69 230.47 s&p 500 index 100.00 132.37 150.48 152.55 170.78 208.05

december 31 , ( in dollars ) 201720162015201420132012 .

Question: did jpmorgan chase outperform the kbw bank index?
Answer: yes
Calculation: greater(277.62, 230.72)
Explanation: outperform = greater 5 year total return
stock performance graph the following line-graph presentation compares our cumulative shareholder returns with the standard & poor 2019s information technology index and the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index for the past five years . the line graph assumes the investment of $ 100 in our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s information technology index , and the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index on may 31 , 2002 and assumes reinvestment of all dividends . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among global payments inc. , the s&p 500 index and the s&p information technology index 5/02 5/03 5/04 5/05 5/06 5/07 global payments inc . s&p 500 s&p information technology * $ 100 invested on 5/31/02 in stock or index-including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending may 31 . global payments s&p 500 information technology .

Table: global payments s&p 500 s&p information technology may 31 2002 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 may 31 2003 94.20 91.94 94.48 may 31 2004 129.77 108.79 115.24 may 31 2005 193.30 117.75 116.29 may 31 2006 260.35 127.92 117.14 may 31 2007 224.24 157.08 144.11

issuer purchases of equity securities on april 5 , 2007 , our board of directors authorized repurchases of our common stock in an amount up to $ 100 million . the board has authorized us to purchase shares from time to time as market conditions permit . there is no expiration date with respect to this authorization . no amounts have been repurchased during the fiscal year ended may 31 , 2007. .

Question: what will be the rate of return for global payments from 2003 to 2004?
Answer: 37.8%
Calculation: divide(subtract(129.77, 94.20), 94.20)
have access to liquidity by issuing bonds to public or private investors based on our assessment of the current condition of the credit markets . at december 31 , 2009 , we had a working capital surplus of approximately $ 1.0 billion , which reflects our decision to maintain additional cash reserves to enhance liquidity in response to difficult economic conditions . at december 31 , 2008 , we had a working capital deficit of approximately $ 100 million . historically , we have had a working capital deficit , which is common in our industry and does not indicate a lack of liquidity . we maintain adequate resources and , when necessary , have access to capital to meet any daily and short-term cash requirements , and we have sufficient financial capacity to satisfy our current liabilities . cash flows millions of dollars 2009 2008 2007 .

Table: millions of dollars 2009 2008 2007 cash provided by operating activities $ 3234 $ 4070 $ 3277 cash used in investing activities -2175 ( 2175 ) -2764 ( 2764 ) -2426 ( 2426 ) cash used in financing activities -458 ( 458 ) -935 ( 935 ) -800 ( 800 ) net change in cash and cash equivalents $ 601 $ 371 $ 51

operating activities lower net income in 2009 , a reduction of $ 184 million in the outstanding balance of our accounts receivable securitization program , higher pension contributions of $ 72 million , and changes to working capital combined to decrease cash provided by operating activities compared to 2008 . higher net income and changes in working capital combined to increase cash provided by operating activities in 2008 compared to 2007 . in addition , accelerated tax deductions enacted in 2008 on certain new operating assets resulted in lower income tax payments in 2008 versus 2007 . voluntary pension contributions in 2008 totaling $ 200 million and other pension contributions of $ 8 million partially offset the year-over-year increase versus 2007 . investing activities lower capital investments and higher proceeds from asset sales drove the decrease in cash used in investing activities in 2009 versus 2008 . increased capital investments and lower proceeds from asset sales drove the increase in cash used in investing activities in 2008 compared to 2007. .

Question: without the 2008 voluntary pension contributions , how much cash would have been provided by operating activities , in millions?
Answer: 4270
Calculation: add(4070, 200)
comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph compares the cumulative total return on citigroup 2019s common stock with the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period extending through december 31 , 2009 . the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2004 in citigroup 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index and that all dividends were reinvested . citigroup s&p 500 index s&p financial index 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended .

Table: december 31 citigroup s&p 500 index s&p financial index 2005 104.38 104.83 106.30 2006 124.02 121.20 126.41 2007 70.36 127.85 103.47 2008 18.71 81.12 47.36 2009 9.26 102.15 55.27

.

Question: what was the percent of the decline on the citigroup cumulative total return from 2007 to 2008
Answer: -73.4%
Calculation: divide(subtract(18.71, 70.36), 70.36)
state street corporation | 52 shareholder return performance presentation the graph presented below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on state street's common stock to the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index , the s&p financial index and the kbw bank index over a five-year period . the cumulative total shareholder return assumes the investment of $ 100 in state street common stock and in each index on december 31 , 2012 . it also assumes reinvestment of common stock dividends . the s&p financial index is a publicly available , capitalization-weighted index , comprised of 67 of the standard & poor 2019s 500 companies , representing 27 diversified financial services companies , 23 insurance companies , and 17 banking companies . the kbw bank index is a modified cap-weighted index consisting of 24 exchange-listed stocks , representing national money center banks and leading regional institutions. .

Table: 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 state street corporation $ 100 $ 159 $ 172 $ 148 $ 178 $ 227 s&p 500 index 100 132 151 153 171 208 s&p financial index 100 136 156 154 189 230 kbw bank index 100 138 151 151 195 231

.

Question: what is the roi of an investment is state street corporation from 2012 to 2015?
Answer: 48%
Calculation: divide(subtract(148, 100), 100)
performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 77787 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2017 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2016 . the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2011 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested . comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials .

Table: date citi s&p 500 s&p financials 31-dec-2011 100.0 100.0 100.0 31-dec-2012 150.6 116.0 128.8 31-dec-2013 198.5 153.6 174.7 31-dec-2014 206.3 174.6 201.3 31-dec-2015 197.8 177.0 198.2 31-dec-2016 229.3 198.2 243.4

.

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total return for citi common stock for the five years ended december 31 , 2016?
Answer: 129.3%
Calculation: divide(subtract(229.3, const_100), const_100)
five-year performance comparison 2013 the following graph provides an indicator of cumulative total shareholder returns for the corporation as compared to the peer group index ( described above ) , the dj trans , and the s&p 500 . the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested in the common stock of union pacific corporation and each index on december 31 , 2008 and that all dividends were reinvested . the information below is historical in nature and is not necessarily indicative of future performance . purchases of equity securities 2013 during 2013 , we repurchased 14996957 shares of our common stock at an average price of $ 152.14 . the following table presents common stock repurchases during each month for the fourth quarter of 2013 : period total number of shares purchased [a] average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announced plan or program [b] maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plan or program [b] .

Table: period total number ofsharespurchased [a] averageprice paidper share total number of sharespurchased as part ofapublicly announced planor program [b] maximum number ofshares that may yetbe purchased under the planor program [b] oct . 1 through oct . 31 1405535 153.18 1405535 4020650 nov . 1 through nov . 30 1027840 158.66 1025000 2995650 dec . 1 through dec . 31 2500944 163.14 2498520 497130 total 4934319 $ 159.37 4929055 n/a

[a] total number of shares purchased during the quarter includes approximately 5264 shares delivered or attested to upc by employees to pay stock option exercise prices , satisfy excess tax withholding obligations for stock option exercises or vesting of retention units , and pay withholding obligations for vesting of retention shares . [b] on april 1 , 2011 , our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to 40 million shares of our common stock by march 31 , 2014 . these repurchases may be made on the open market or through other transactions . our management has sole discretion with respect to determining the timing and amount of these transactions . on november 21 , 2013 , the board of directors approved the early renewal of the share repurchase program , authorizing the repurchase of 60 million common shares by december 31 , 2017 . the new authorization is effective january 1 , 2014 , and replaces the previous authorization , which expired on december 31 , 2013 , three months earlier than its original expiration date. .

Question: for the quarter ended december 31 , 2013 what was the percent of the total number of shares purchased in november
Answer: 20.8%
Calculation: divide(1027840, 4934319)
entergy louisiana , llc management's financial discussion and analysis net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) .

Table: amount ( in millions ) 2007 net revenue $ 991.1 retail electric price -17.1 ( 17.1 ) purchased power capacity -12.0 ( 12.0 ) net wholesale revenue -7.4 ( 7.4 ) other 4.6 2008 net revenue $ 959.2

the retail electric price variance is primarily due to the cessation of the interim storm recovery through the formula rate plan upon the act 55 financing of storm costs and a credit passed on to customers as a result of the act 55 storm cost financing , partially offset by increases in the formula rate plan effective october 2007 . refer to "hurricane rita and hurricane katrina" and "state and local rate regulation" below for a discussion of the interim recovery of storm costs , the act 55 storm cost financing , and the formula rate plan filing . the purchased power capacity variance is due to the amortization of deferred capacity costs effective september 2007 as a result of the formula rate plan filing in may 2007 . purchased power capacity costs are offset in base revenues due to a base rate increase implemented to recover incremental deferred and ongoing purchased power capacity charges . see "state and local rate regulation" below for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to provisions recorded for potential rate refunds related to the treatment of interruptible load in pricing entergy system affiliate sales . gross operating revenue and , fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 364.7 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates offset by decreased usage . the increase was partially offset by a decrease of $ 56.8 million in gross wholesale revenue due to a decrease in system agreement rough production cost equalization credits . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power , partially offset by a decrease in the recovery from customers of deferred fuel costs. .

Question: what is the percent change in net revenue between 2007 and 2008?
Answer: -34.3%
Calculation: divide(subtract(959.2, 991.1), 991.1)