bevaya/FinQA huggingface dataset:
annual report on form 10-k 108 fifth third bancorp part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the information required by this item is included in the corporate information found on the inside of the back cover and in the discussion of dividend limitations that the subsidiaries can pay to the bancorp discussed in note 26 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements . additionally , as of december 31 , 2008 , the bancorp had approximately 60025 shareholders of record . issuer purchases of equity securities period shares purchased average paid per shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs maximum shares that may be purchased under the plans or programs .

Table: period sharespurchased ( a ) averagepricepaid pershare sharespurchasedas part ofpubliclyannouncedplans orprograms maximumshares thatmay bepurchasedunder theplans orprograms october 2008 25394 $ - - 19201518 november 2008 7526 - - 19201518 december 2008 40 - - 19201518 total 32960 $ - - 19201518

( a ) the bancorp repurchased 25394 , 7526 and 40 shares during october , november and december of 2008 in connection with various employee compensation plans of the bancorp . these purchases are not included against the maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the board of directors authorization. .

Question: what portion of the total purchased shares presented in the table was purchased during october 2008?
Answer: 77.0%
Calculation: divide(25394, 32960)
eog resources , inc . supplemental information to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) capitalized costs relating to oil and gas producing activities . the following table sets forth the capitalized costs relating to eog's crude oil and natural gas producing activities at december 31 , 2017 and 2016: .

Table: 2017 2016 proved properties $ 48845672 $ 45751965 unproved properties 3710069 3840126 total 52555741 49592091 accumulated depreciation depletion and amortization -29191247 ( 29191247 ) -26247062 ( 26247062 ) net capitalized costs $ 23364494 $ 23345029

costs incurred in oil and gas property acquisition , exploration and development activities . the acquisition , exploration and development costs disclosed in the following tables are in accordance with definitions in the extractive industries - oil and a gas topic of the accounting standards codification ( asc ) . acquisition costs include costs incurred to purchase , lease or otherwise acquire property . exploration costs include additions to exploratory wells , including those in progress , and exploration expenses . development costs include additions to production facilities and equipment and additions to development wells , including those in progress. .

Question: what are the average cost of accumulated depreciation depletion and amortization for 2016 and 2017?
Answer: 27719154.5
Calculation: table_average(accumulated depreciation depletion and amortization, none)
Explanation: it is the sum of the accumulated depreciation depletion and amortization for both years divided by two .
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities at january 25 , 2019 , we had 26812 holders of record of our common stock , par value $ 1 per share . our common stock is traded on the new york stock exchange ( nyse ) under the symbol lmt . information concerning dividends paid on lockheed martin common stock during the past two years is as follows : common stock - dividends paid per share .

Table: quarter dividends paid per share 2018 dividends paid per share 2017 first $ 2.00 $ 1.82 second 2.00 1.82 third 2.00 1.82 fourth 2.20 2.00 year $ 8.20 $ 7.46

stockholder return performance graph the following graph compares the total return on a cumulative basis of $ 100 invested in lockheed martin common stock on december 31 , 2013 to the standard and poor 2019s ( s&p ) 500 index and the s&p aerospace & defense index . the s&p aerospace & defense index comprises arconic inc. , general dynamics corporation , harris corporation , huntington ingalls industries , l3 technologies , inc. , lockheed martin corporation , northrop grumman corporation , raytheon company , textron inc. , the boeing company , transdigm group inc. , and united technologies corporation . the stockholder return performance indicated on the graph is not a guarantee of future performance. .

Question: what was the percentage increase in the dividends paid per share for the year from 2007 to 2008
Answer: 9.9%
Calculation: divide(subtract(8.20, 7.46), 7.46)
selling , general , and administrative expenses selling , general , and administrative expenses increased to $ 65.2 million in 2010 from $ 52.9 million in 2009 due primarily to increases in compensation expense and recruitment costs , principally in connection with higher headcount in 2010 , and an increase in non-cash compensation expense for the reasons described above . cost of goods sold cost of goods sold in 2010 and 2009 was $ 2.1 million and $ 1.7 million , respectively , and consisted primarily of royalties and other period costs related to arcalyst ae commercial supplies . to date , arcalyst ae shipments to our customers have primarily consisted of supplies of inventory manufactured and expensed as research and development costs prior to fda approval in 2008 ; therefore , the costs of these supplies were not included in costs of goods sold . other income and expense investment income decreased to $ 2.1 million in 2010 from $ 4.5 million in 2009 , due primarily to lower yields on , and lower average balances of , cash and marketable securities . interest expense increased to $ 9.1 million in 2010 from $ 2.3 million in 2009 . interest expense is primarily attributable to the imputed interest portion of payments to our landlord , commencing in the third quarter of 2009 , to lease newly constructed laboratory and office facilities in tarrytown , new york . income tax expense ( benefit ) in 2010 , we did not recognize any income tax expense or benefit . in 2009 , we recognized a $ 4.1 million income tax benefit , consisting primarily of ( i ) $ 2.7 million resulting from a provision in the worker , homeownership , and business assistance act of 2009 that allowed us to claim a refund of u.s . federal alternative minimum tax that we paid in 2008 , and ( ii ) $ 0.7 million resulting from a provision in the american recovery and reinvestment act of 2009 that allowed us to claim a refund for a portion of our unused pre-2006 research tax credits . years ended december 31 , 2009 and 2008 net loss regeneron reported a net loss of $ 67.8 million , or $ 0.85 per share ( basic and diluted ) , for the year ended december 31 , 2009 , compared to a net loss of $ 79.1 million , or $ 1.00 per share ( basic and diluted ) for 2008 . the decrease in our net loss in 2009 was principally due to higher collaboration revenue in connection with our antibody collaboration with sanofi-aventis , receipt of a $ 20.0 million substantive performance milestone payment in connection with our vegf trap-eye collaboration with bayer healthcare , and higher arcalyst ae sales , partly offset by higher research and development expenses , as detailed below . revenues revenues in 2009 and 2008 consist of the following: .

Table: ( in millions ) 2009 2008 collaboration revenue sanofi-aventis $ 247.2 $ 154.0 bayer healthcare 67.3 31.2 total collaboration revenue 314.5 185.2 technology licensing revenue 40.0 40.0 net product sales 18.4 6.3 contract research and other revenue 6.4 7.0 total revenue $ 379.3 $ 238.5

.

Question: what percentage of total revenue was bayer healthcare in 2008?
Answer: 14%
Calculation: divide(31.2, 238.5)
we believe that the presentation of adjusted diluted earnings per share , which excludes withdrawal costs 2013 multiemployer pension funds , restructuring charges , loss on extinguishment of debt , and ( gain ) loss on business dispositions and impairments , net , provides an understanding of operational activities before the financial effect of certain items . we use this measure , and believe investors will find it helpful , in understanding the ongoing performance of our operations separate from items that have a disproportionate effect on our results for a particular period . we have incurred comparable charges and costs in prior periods , and similar types of adjustments can reasonably be expected to be recorded in future periods . our definition of adjusted diluted earnings per share may not be comparable to similarly titled measures presented by other companies . property and equipment , net in 2017 , we anticipate receiving approximately $ 975 million of property and equipment , net of proceeds from sales of property and equipment , as follows: .

Table: trucks and equipment $ 350 landfill 330 containers 160 facilities and other 150 property and equipment received during 2017 990 proceeds from sales of property and equipment -15 ( 15 ) property and equipment received net of proceeds during 2017 $ 975

results of operations revenue we generate revenue primarily from our solid waste collection operations . our remaining revenue is from other services , including transfer station , landfill disposal , recycling , and energy services . our residential and small- container commercial collection operations in some markets are based on long-term contracts with municipalities . certain of our municipal contracts have annual price escalation clauses that are tied to changes in an underlying base index such as a consumer price index . we generally provide small-container commercial and large-container industrial collection services to customers under contracts with terms up to three years . our transfer stations , landfills and , to a lesser extent , our recycling facilities generate revenue from disposal or tipping fees charged to third parties . in general , we integrate our recycling operations with our collection operations and obtain revenue from the sale of recycled commodities . our revenue from energy services consists mainly of fees we charge for the treatment of liquid and solid waste derived from the production of oil and natural gas . other revenue consists primarily of revenue from national accounts , which represents the portion of revenue generated from nationwide or regional contracts in markets outside our operating areas where the associated waste handling services are subcontracted to local operators . consequently , substantially all of this revenue is offset with related subcontract costs , which are recorded in cost of operations. .

Question: as part of the sales proceeds net what was the ratio of trucks and equipment to the containers
Answer: 2.2
Calculation: divide(350, 160)
Explanation: there is 2.2 trucks and equipment for every container
december 18 , 2007 , we issued an additional 23182197 shares of common stock to citadel . the issuances were exempt from registration pursuant to section 4 ( 2 ) of the securities act of 1933 , and each purchaser has represented to us that it is an 201caccredited investor 201d as defined in regulation d promulgated under the securities act of 1933 , and that the common stock was being acquired for investment . we did not engage in a general solicitation or advertising with regard to the issuances of the common stock and have not offered securities to the public in connection with the issuances . see item 1 . business 2014citadel investment . performance graph the following performance graph shows the cumulative total return to a holder of the company 2019s common stock , assuming dividend reinvestment , compared with the cumulative total return , assuming dividend reinvestment , of the standard & poor 2019s ( 201cs&p 201d ) 500 and the s&p super cap diversified financials during the period from december 31 , 2002 through december 31 , 2007. .

Table: 12/02 12/03 12/04 12/05 12/06 12/07 e*trade financial corporation 100.00 260.29 307.61 429.22 461.32 73.05 s&p 500 100.00 128.68 142.69 149.70 173.34 182.87 s&p super cap diversified financials 100.00 139.29 156.28 170.89 211.13 176.62

2022 $ 100 invested on 12/31/02 in stock or index-including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending december 31 . 2022 copyright a9 2008 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc . all rights reserved . www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm .

Question: as of december 2007 what was the ratio of the ratio of the cumulative total return for s&p 500 to the e*trade financial corporation
Answer: 2.5
Calculation: divide(182.87, 73.05)
Explanation: as of december 2007 there was 2.5 times the amount of returns for the s&p 500 to the e*trade financial corporation
12 . brokerage receivables and brokerage payables citi has receivables and payables for financial instruments sold to and purchased from brokers , dealers and customers , which arise in the ordinary course of business . citi is exposed to risk of loss from the inability of brokers , dealers or customers to pay for purchases or to deliver the financial instruments sold , in which case citi would have to sell or purchase the financial instruments at prevailing market prices . credit risk is reduced to the extent that an exchange or clearing organization acts as a counterparty to the transaction and replaces the broker , dealer or customer in question . citi seeks to protect itself from the risks associated with customer activities by requiring customers to maintain margin collateral in compliance with regulatory and internal guidelines . margin levels are monitored daily , and customers deposit additional collateral as required . where customers cannot meet collateral requirements , citi may liquidate sufficient underlying financial instruments to bring the customer into compliance with the required margin level . exposure to credit risk is impacted by market volatility , which may impair the ability of clients to satisfy their obligations to citi . credit limits are established and closely monitored for customers and for brokers and dealers engaged in forwards , futures and other transactions deemed to be credit sensitive . brokerage receivables and brokerage payables consisted of the following: .

Table: in millions of dollars december 31 , 2016 december 31 , 2015 receivables from customers $ 10374 $ 10435 receivables from brokers dealers and clearing organizations 18513 17248 total brokerage receivables ( 1 ) $ 28887 $ 27683 payables to customers $ 37237 $ 35653 payables to brokers dealers and clearing organizations 19915 18069 total brokerage payables ( 1 ) $ 57152 $ 53722

payables to brokers , dealers , and clearing organizations 19915 18069 total brokerage payables ( 1 ) $ 57152 $ 53722 ( 1 ) includes brokerage receivables and payables recorded by citi broker- dealer entities that are accounted for in accordance with the aicpa accounting guide for brokers and dealers in securities as codified in asc 940-320. .

Question: as of december 31 , 2016 what was the ratio of receivables from brokers dealers and clearing organizations to payables to brokers dealers and clearing organizations?
Answer: .93
Calculation: divide(18513, 19915)
note 4 - goodwill and other intangible assets : goodwill the company had approximately $ 93.2 million and $ 94.4 million of goodwill at december 30 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 , respectively . the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended december 30 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 are as follows ( in thousands ) : .

Table: 2017 2016 balance beginning of year $ 94417 $ 10258 goodwill acquired as part of acquisition 2014 84159 working capital settlement -1225 ( 1225 ) 2014 impairment loss 2014 2014 balance end of year $ 93192 $ 94417

goodwill is allocated to each identified reporting unit , which is defined as an operating segment or one level below the operating segment . goodwill is not amortized , but is evaluated for impairment annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable . the company completes its impairment evaluation by performing valuation analyses and considering other publicly available market information , as appropriate . the test used to identify the potential for goodwill impairment compares the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying value . an impairment charge would be recorded to the company 2019s operations for the amount , if any , in which the carrying value exceeds the fair value . in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 , the company completed its annual impairment testing of goodwill and no impairment was identified . the company determined that the fair value of each reporting unit ( including goodwill ) was in excess of the carrying value of the respective reporting unit . in reaching this conclusion , the fair value of each reporting unit was determined based on either a market or an income approach . under the market approach , the fair value is based on observed market data . other intangible assets the company had approximately $ 31.3 million of intangible assets other than goodwill at december 30 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 . the intangible asset balance represents the estimated fair value of the petsense tradename , which is not subject to amortization as it has an indefinite useful life on the basis that it is expected to contribute cash flows beyond the foreseeable horizon . with respect to intangible assets , we evaluate for impairment annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable . we recognize an impairment loss only if the carrying amount is not recoverable through its discounted cash flows and measure the impairment loss based on the difference between the carrying value and fair value . in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 , the company completed its annual impairment testing of intangible assets and no impairment was identified. .

Question: how much is the goodwill worth in 2016 if the intangible assets are worth $ 31.1 million?
Answer: $ 63.1 million
Calculation: subtract(94.4, 31.3)
Explanation: in the first line , it says that the goodwill and intangibles assets for 2016 was $ 94.4 million this means that if the intangible assets was $ 31.3 million . therefore , the goodwill will be 63.1 million
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities at january 25 , 2019 , we had 26812 holders of record of our common stock , par value $ 1 per share . our common stock is traded on the new york stock exchange ( nyse ) under the symbol lmt . information concerning dividends paid on lockheed martin common stock during the past two years is as follows : common stock - dividends paid per share .

Table: quarter dividends paid per share 2018 dividends paid per share 2017 first $ 2.00 $ 1.82 second 2.00 1.82 third 2.00 1.82 fourth 2.20 2.00 year $ 8.20 $ 7.46

stockholder return performance graph the following graph compares the total return on a cumulative basis of $ 100 invested in lockheed martin common stock on december 31 , 2013 to the standard and poor 2019s ( s&p ) 500 index and the s&p aerospace & defense index . the s&p aerospace & defense index comprises arconic inc. , general dynamics corporation , harris corporation , huntington ingalls industries , l3 technologies , inc. , lockheed martin corporation , northrop grumman corporation , raytheon company , textron inc. , the boeing company , transdigm group inc. , and united technologies corporation . the stockholder return performance indicated on the graph is not a guarantee of future performance. .

Question: what is the net change in total dividends paid per share from 2017 to 2018?
Answer: 0.74
Calculation: subtract(8.20, 7.46)
table of contents e*trade | 2016 10-k 24 2022 limits on the persons who may call special meetings of stockholders 2022 the prohibition of stockholder action by written consent 2022 advance notice requirements for nominations to the board or for proposing matters that can be acted on by stockholders at stockholder meetings in addition , certain provisions of our stock incentive plans , management retention and employment agreements ( including severance payments and stock option acceleration ) , our senior secured credit facility , certain provisions of delaware law and certain provisions of the indentures governing certain series of our debt securities that would require us to offer to purchase such securities at a premium in the event of certain changes in our ownership may also discourage , delay or prevent someone from acquiring or merging with us , which could limit the opportunity for our stockholders to receive a premium for their shares of our common stock and could also affect the price that some investors are willing to pay for our common stock . item 1b . unresolved staff comments item 2 . properties a summary of our significant locations at december 31 , 2016 is shown in the following table . square footage amounts are net of space that has been sublet or space that is part of a facility restructuring. .

Table: location approximate square footage alpharetta georgia 260000 jersey city new jersey 109000 arlington virginia 102000 sandy utah 85000 menlo park california 63000 new york new york 52000 chicago illinois 37000

all facilities are leased at december 31 , 2016 . all other leased facilities with space of less than 25000 square feet are not listed by location . in addition to the significant facilities above , we also lease all 30 regional branches , ranging in space from approximately 2500 to 8000 square feet . item 3 . legal proceedings information in response to this item can be found under the heading legal matters in note 21 2014 commitments , contingencies and other regulatory matters in this annual report and is incorporated by reference into this item . item 4 . mine safety disclosures not applicable. .

Question: at december 312016 what was the ratio of the square footage of alpharetta georgia to jersey city new jersey
Answer: 2.39
Calculation: divide(260000, 109000)
Explanation: at december 312016 there was 2.39 square footage of alpharetta georgia for each square foot in jersey city new jersey