bevaya/FinQA huggingface dataset:
visa inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) september 30 , 2008 ( in millions , except as noted ) purchase consideration total purchase consideration of approximately $ 17.3 billion was exchanged in october 2007 for the acquired interests . the consideration was comprised of the following: .

Table: in millions visa inc . common stock $ 16785 visa europe put option 346 liability under framework agreement 132 total purchase consideration issued at reorganization date 17263 visa inc . shares issued as additional purchase consideration at the time of the true-up ( 1 ) 1150 total purchase consideration $ 18413

( 1 ) see description of the true-up of purchase consideration below . see note 4 2014visa europe for more information related to the visa europe put option and the liability under framework agreement . visa inc . common stock issued in exchange for the acquired regions the value of the purchase consideration conveyed to each of the member groups of the acquired regions was determined by valuing the underlying businesses contributed by each , after giving effect to negotiated adjustments . the value of the purchase consideration , consisting of all outstanding shares of class canada , class ap , class lac and class cemea common stock , was measured at june 15 , 2007 ( the 201cmeasurement date 201d ) , the date on which all parties entered into the global restructuring agreement , and was determined to have a fair value of approximately $ 12.6 billion . the company primarily relied upon the analysis of comparable companies with similar industry , business model and financial profiles . this analysis considered a range of metrics including the forward multiples of revenue ; earnings before interest , depreciation and amortization ; and net income of comparable companies . ultimately , the company determined that the forward net income multiple was the most appropriate measure to value the acquired regions and reflect anticipated changes in the company 2019s financial profile prospectively . this multiple was applied to the corresponding forward net income of the acquired regions to calculate their value . the most comparable company identified was mastercard inc . therefore , the most significant input into this analysis was mastercard 2019s forward net income multiple of 27 times net income at the measurement date . the company additionally performed discounted cash flow analyses for each region . these analyses considered the company 2019s forecast by region and incorporated market participant assumptions for growth and profitability . the cash flows were discounted using rates ranging from 12-16% ( 12-16 % ) , reflecting returns for investments times earnings before interest , tax , depreciation and amortization ( 201cebitda 201d ) to ascribe value to periods beyond the company 2019s forecast , consistent with recent payment processing , financial exchange and credit card precedent transactions. .

Question: what portion of the total purchase consideration was issued at the time of the true-up?
Answer: 6.2%
Calculation: divide(1150, 18413)
federal realty investment trust schedule iii summary of real estate and accumulated depreciation 2014continued three years ended december 31 , 2010 reconciliation of accumulated depreciation and amortization ( in thousands ) .

Table: balance december 31 2007 $ 756703 additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense 101321 deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property -11766 ( 11766 ) balance december 31 2008 846258 additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense 103698 deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property -11869 ( 11869 ) balance december 31 2009 938087 additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense 108261 deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property -11144 ( 11144 ) balance december 31 2010 $ 1035204

.

Question: considering the years 2009-2010 , what is the increase in the final balance?
Answer: 10.35%
Calculation: subtract(divide(1035204, 938087), const_1)
Explanation: it is the balance at 2010 divided by the one at 2009 , then turned into a percentage .
devon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) other debentures and notes following are descriptions of the various other debentures and notes outstanding at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , as listed in the table presented at the beginning of this note . geosouthern debt in december 2013 , in conjunction with the planned geosouthern acquisition , devon issued $ 2.25 billion aggregate principal amount of fixed and floating rate senior notes resulting in cash proceeds of approximately $ 2.2 billion , net of discounts and issuance costs . the floating rate senior notes due in 2015 bear interest at a rate equal to three-month libor plus 0.45 percent , which rate will be reset quarterly . the floating rate senior notes due in 2016 bears interest at a rate equal to three-month libor plus 0.54 percent , which rate will be reset quarterly . the schedule below summarizes the key terms of these notes ( in millions ) . .

Table: floating rate due december 15 2015 $ 500 floating rate due december 15 2016 350 1.20% ( 1.20 % ) due december 15 2016 ( 1 ) 650 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) due december 15 2018 750 discount and issuance costs -2 ( 2 ) net proceeds $ 2248

( 1 ) the 1.20% ( 1.20 % ) $ 650 million note due december 15 , 2016 was redeemed on november 13 , 2014 . the senior notes were classified as short-term debt on devon 2019s consolidated balance sheet as of december 31 , 2013 due to certain redemption features in the event that the geosouthern acquisition was not completed on or prior to june 30 , 2014 . on february 28 , 2014 , the geosouthern acquisition closed and thus the senior notes were subsequently classified as long-term debt . additionally , during december 2013 , devon entered into a term loan agreement with a group of major financial institutions pursuant to which devon could draw up to $ 2.0 billion to finance , in part , the geosouthern acquisition and to pay transaction costs . in february 2014 , devon drew the $ 2.0 billion of term loans for the geosouthern transaction , and the amount was subsequently repaid on june 30 , 2014 with the canadian divestiture proceeds that were repatriated to the u.s . in june 2014 , at which point the term loan was terminated. .

Question: what is the ratio of the floating rate due december 2015 compared to 2016
Answer: 1.43
Calculation: divide(500, 350)
Explanation: there was $ 1.43 due in 2015 for each $ 1 due in 2016
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our class a common stock on the new york stock exchange ( 201cnyse 201d ) for the years 2007 and 2006. .

Table: 2007 high low quarter ended march 31 $ 41.31 $ 36.63 quarter ended june 30 43.84 37.64 quarter ended september 30 45.45 36.34 quarter ended december 31 46.53 40.08 2006 high low quarter ended march 31 $ 32.68 $ 26.66 quarter ended june 30 35.75 27.35 quarter ended september 30 36.92 29.98 quarter ended december 31 38.74 35.21

on february 29 , 2008 , the closing price of our class a common stock was $ 38.44 per share as reported on the nyse . as of february 29 , 2008 , we had 395748826 outstanding shares of class a common stock and 528 registered holders . dividends we have never paid a dividend on any class of our common stock . we anticipate that we may retain future earnings , if any , to fund the development and growth of our business . the indentures governing our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 201c7.50% ( 201c7.50 % ) notes 201d ) and our 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 201c7.125% ( 201c7.125 % ) notes 201d ) may prohibit us from paying dividends to our stockholders unless we satisfy certain financial covenants . the loan agreement for our revolving credit facility and the indentures governing the terms of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes contain covenants that restrict our ability to pay dividends unless certain financial covenants are satisfied . in addition , while spectrasite and its subsidiaries are classified as unrestricted subsidiaries under the indentures for our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes , certain of spectrasite 2019s subsidiaries are subject to restrictions on the amount of cash that they can distribute to us under the loan agreement related to our securitization . for more information about the restrictions under the loan agreement for the revolving credit facility , our notes indentures and the loan agreement related to the securitization , see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources 2014factors affecting sources of liquidity 201d and note 3 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. .

Question: what is the average number of shares per registered holder as of february 29 , 2008?
Answer: 749524
Calculation: divide(395748826, 528)
performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock with the cumulative total return for the same period of pmi's peer group and the s&p 500 index . the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 as of december 31 , 2012 , in pmi common stock ( at prices quoted on the new york stock exchange ) and each of the indices as of the market close and reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis . date pmi pmi peer group ( 1 ) s&p 500 index .

Table: date pmi pmi peer group ( 1 ) s&p 500 index december 31 2012 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 december 31 2013 $ 108.50 $ 122.80 $ 132.40 december 31 2014 $ 106.20 $ 132.50 $ 150.50 december 31 2015 $ 120.40 $ 143.50 $ 152.60 december 31 2016 $ 130.80 $ 145.60 $ 170.80 december 31 2017 $ 156.80 $ 172.70 $ 208.10

( 1 ) the pmi peer group presented in this graph is the same as that used in the prior year , except reynolds american inc . was removed following the completion of its acquisition by british american tobacco p.l.c . on july 25 , 2017 . the pmi peer group was established based on a review of four characteristics : global presence ; a focus on consumer products ; and net revenues and a market capitalization of a similar size to those of pmi . the review also considered the primary international tobacco companies . as a result of this review , the following companies constitute the pmi peer group : altria group , inc. , anheuser-busch inbev sa/nv , british american tobacco p.l.c. , the coca-cola company , colgate-palmolive co. , diageo plc , heineken n.v. , imperial brands plc , japan tobacco inc. , johnson & johnson , kimberly-clark corporation , the kraft-heinz company , mcdonald's corp. , mondel z international , inc. , nestl e9 s.a. , pepsico , inc. , the procter & gamble company , roche holding ag , and unilever nv and plc . note : figures are rounded to the nearest $ 0.10. .

Question: what was the difference in percentage cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock versus the s&p 500 index for the five years ended december 31 , 2017?
Answer: -51.3%
Calculation: subtract(divide(subtract(156.80, const_100), const_100), divide(subtract(208.10, const_100), const_100))
stock performance graph the following line-graph presentation compares our cumulative shareholder returns with the standard & poor 2019s information technology index and the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index for the past five years . the line graph assumes the investment of $ 100 in our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s information technology index , and the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index on may 31 , 2002 and assumes reinvestment of all dividends . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among global payments inc. , the s&p 500 index and the s&p information technology index 5/02 5/03 5/04 5/05 5/06 5/07 global payments inc . s&p 500 s&p information technology * $ 100 invested on 5/31/02 in stock or index-including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending may 31 . global payments s&p 500 information technology .

Table: global payments s&p 500 s&p information technology may 31 2002 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 may 31 2003 94.20 91.94 94.48 may 31 2004 129.77 108.79 115.24 may 31 2005 193.30 117.75 116.29 may 31 2006 260.35 127.92 117.14 may 31 2007 224.24 157.08 144.11

issuer purchases of equity securities on april 5 , 2007 , our board of directors authorized repurchases of our common stock in an amount up to $ 100 million . the board has authorized us to purchase shares from time to time as market conditions permit . there is no expiration date with respect to this authorization . no amounts have been repurchased during the fiscal year ended may 31 , 2007. .

Question: what will be the rate of return for global payments from 2002 to 2003?
Answer: -5.8%
Calculation: divide(subtract(94.20, const_100), const_100)
company stock performance the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 composite index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology index . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 composite index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology index as of the market close on september 30 , 2007 . data points on the graph are annual . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . sep-11sep-10sep-09sep-08sep-07 sep-12 apple inc . s&p 500 s&p computer hardware dow jones us technology comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among apple inc. , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones us technology index *$ 100 invested on 9/30/07 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending september 30 . copyright a9 2012 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 .

Table: september 30 2007 september 30 2008 september 30 2009 september 30 2010 september 30 2011 september 30 2012 apple inc . $ 100 $ 74 $ 121 $ 185 $ 248 $ 437 s&p 500 $ 100 $ 78 $ 73 $ 80 $ 81 $ 105 s&p computer hardware $ 100 $ 84 $ 99 $ 118 $ 134 $ 214 dow jones us technology $ 100 $ 76 $ 85 $ 95 $ 98 $ 127

.

Question: what was the cumulative total return on apple stock between september 30 2007 and september 30 2012?
Answer: 337
Calculation: subtract(437, const_100)
as of december 31 , 2006 , the company also leased an office and laboratory facility in connecticut , additional office , distribution and storage facilities in san diego , and four foreign facilities located in japan , singapore , china and the netherlands under non-cancelable operating leases that expire at various times through june 2011 . these leases contain renewal options ranging from one to five years . as of december 31 , 2006 , annual future minimum payments under these operating leases were as follows ( in thousands ) : .

Table: 2007 5320 2008 5335 2009 5075 2010 4659 2011 4712 2012 and thereafter 12798 total $ 37899

rent expense , net of amortization of the deferred gain on sale of property , was $ 4723041 , $ 4737218 , and $ 1794234 for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , january 1 , 2006 and january 2 , 2005 , respectively . 6 . stockholders 2019 equity common stock as of december 31 , 2006 , the company had 46857512 shares of common stock outstanding , of which 4814744 shares were sold to employees and consultants subject to restricted stock agreements . the restricted common shares vest in accordance with the provisions of the agreements , generally over five years . all unvested shares are subject to repurchase by the company at the original purchase price . as of december 31 , 2006 , 36000 shares of common stock were subject to repurchase . in addition , the company also issued 12000 shares for a restricted stock award to an employee under the company 2019s new 2005 stock and incentive plan based on service performance . these shares vest monthly over a three-year period . stock options 2005 stock and incentive plan in june 2005 , the stockholders of the company approved the 2005 stock and incentive plan ( the 2005 stock plan ) . upon adoption of the 2005 stock plan , issuance of options under the company 2019s existing 2000 stock plan ceased . the 2005 stock plan provides that an aggregate of up to 11542358 shares of the company 2019s common stock be reserved and available to be issued . in addition , the 2005 stock plan provides for an automatic annual increase in the shares reserved for issuance by the lesser of 5% ( 5 % ) of outstanding shares of the company 2019s common stock on the last day of the immediately preceding fiscal year , 1200000 shares or such lesser amount as determined by the company 2019s board of directors . illumina , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .

Question: what percentage of annual future minimum payments under operating leases are due in 2008?
Answer: 14%
Calculation: divide(5335, 37899)
and penalties , resulting in a liability of $ 1 million for interest and penalties as of december 31 , 2018 . in 2017 , there was a net decrease in income tax expense of $ 1 million for interest and penalties , resulting in no material liability for interest and penalties as of december 31 , 2017 . the 2017 changes in interest and penalties related to statute of limitation expirations . in 2016 , there was a net decrease in income tax expense of $ 2 million for interest and penalties , resulting in a total liability of $ 1 million for interest and penalties as of december 31 , 2016 . the 2016 changes in interest and penalties related to reductions in prior year tax positions and settlement with a taxing authority . the following table summarizes the tax years that are either currently under examination or remain open under the applicable statute of limitations and subject to examination by the major tax jurisdictions in which the company operates: .

Table: jurisdiction united states ( 1 ) jurisdiction 2011 jurisdiction - 2017 connecticut 2016 - 2017 mississippi 2012 - 2017 virginia ( 1 ) 2011 - 2017

virginia ( 1 ) 2011 - 2017 ( 1 ) the 2014 tax year has been closed in these jurisdictions . although the company believes it has adequately provided for all uncertain tax positions , amounts asserted by taxing authorities could be greater than the company's accrued position . accordingly , additional provisions for federal and state income tax related matters could be recorded in the future as revised estimates are made or the underlying matters are effectively settled or otherwise resolved . conversely , the company could settle positions with the tax authorities for amounts lower than have been accrued . the company believes that it is reasonably possible that during the next 12 months the company's liability for uncertain tax positions may decrease by $ 14 million due to resolution of a federal uncertain tax position . during 2013 the company entered into the pre-compliance assurance process with the irs for years 2011 and 2012 . the company is part of the irs compliance assurance process program for the 2014 through 2018 tax years . open tax years related to state jurisdictions remain subject to examination . deferred income taxes - deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and for income tax purposes . as described above , deferred tax assets and liabilities are calculated as of the balance sheet date using current tax laws and rates expected to be in effect when the deferred tax items reverse in future periods . as a result of the reduction in the corporate income tax rate from 35% ( 35 % ) to 21% ( 21 % ) under the tax act , the company revalued its net deferred tax assets as of december 31 , 2017 . net deferred tax assets are classified as long-term deferred tax assets in the consolidated statements of financial position. .

Question: what is the liability for interest and penalties as of december 31 , 2017?
Answer: 0
Calculation: subtract(1, 1)
entergy louisiana , llc and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities . results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased $ 242.5 million primarily due to a settlement with the irs related to the mark-to-market income tax treatment of power purchase contracts , which resulted in a $ 422 million income tax benefit . the net income effect was partially offset by a $ 199 million regulatory charge , which reduced net revenue , because a portion of the benefit will be shared with customers . see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing . 2010 compared to 2009 net income decreased slightly by $ 1.4 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses , a higher effective income tax rate , and higher interest expense , almost entirely offset by higher net revenue . net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 . amount ( in millions ) .

Table: amount ( in millions ) 2010 net revenue $ 1043.7 mark-to-market tax settlement sharing -195.9 ( 195.9 ) retail electric price 32.5 volume/weather 11.6 other -5.7 ( 5.7 ) 2011 net revenue $ 886.2

the mark-to-market tax settlement sharing variance results from a regulatory charge because a portion of the benefits of a settlement with the irs related to the mark-to-market income tax treatment of power purchase contracts will be shared with customers , slightly offset by the amortization of a portion of that charge beginning in october 2011 . see notes 3 and 8 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing . the retail electric price variance is primarily due to a formula rate plan increase effective may 2011 . see note 2 to the financial statements for discussion of the formula rate plan increase. .

Question: what was the percent of the change in the net revenue from 2010 to 2011
Answer: 15.1%
Calculation: divide(subtract(886.2, 1043.7), 1043.7)