bevaya/FinQA huggingface dataset:
18 2015 annual report performance graph the following chart presents a comparison for the five-year period ended june 30 , 2015 , of the market performance of the company 2019s common stock with the s&p 500 index and an index of peer companies selected by the company : comparison of 5 year cumulative total return among jack henry & associates , inc. , the s&p 500 index , and a peer group the following information depicts a line graph with the following values: .

Table: 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 jkhy 100.00 127.44 148.62 205.60 263.21 290.88 peer group 100.00 136.78 148.10 174.79 239.10 301.34 s&p 500 100.00 130.69 137.81 166.20 207.10 222.47

this comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on june 30 , 2010 , and assumes reinvestments of dividends . total returns are calculated according to market capitalization of peer group members at the beginning of each period . peer companies selected are in the business of providing specialized computer software , hardware and related services to financial institutions and other businesses . companies in the peer group are aci worldwide , inc. , bottomline technology , inc. , broadridge financial solutions , cardtronics , inc. , convergys corp. , corelogic , inc. , dst systems , inc. , euronet worldwide , inc. , fair isaac corp. , fidelity national information services , inc. , fiserv , inc. , global payments , inc. , heartland payment systems , inc. , moneygram international , inc. , ss&c technologies holdings , inc. , total systems services , inc. , tyler technologies , inc. , verifone systems , inc. , and wex , inc. . micros systems , inc . was removed from the peer group as it was acquired in september 2014. .

Question: what was the percentage change in the 5 year annual performance of the peer group stock from 2010 to 2011
Answer: 8.3%
Calculation: divide(subtract(148.10, 136.78), 136.78)
as of december 31 , 2017 , the aggregate future minimum payments under non-cancelable operating leases consist of the following ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31 .

Table: 2018 $ 9127 2019 8336 2020 8350 2021 7741 2022 7577 thereafter 9873 total minimum future lease payments $ 51004

rent expense for all operating leases amounted to $ 9.4 million , $ 8.1 million and $ 5.4 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . financing obligation 2014build-to-suit lease in august 2012 , we executed a lease for a building then under construction in santa clara , california to serve as our headquarters . the lease term is 120 months and commenced in august 2013 . based on the terms of the lease agreement and due to our involvement in certain aspects of the construction , we were deemed the owner of the building ( for accounting purposes only ) during the construction period . upon completion of construction in 2013 , we concluded that we had forms of continued economic involvement in the facility , and therefore did not meet with the provisions for sale-leaseback accounting . we continue to maintain involvement in the property post construction and lack transferability of the risks and rewards of ownership , due to our required maintenance of a $ 4.0 million letter of credit , in addition to our ability and option to sublease our portion of the leased building for fees substantially higher than our base rate . therefore , the lease is accounted for as a financing obligation and lease payments will be attributed to ( 1 ) a reduction of the principal financing obligation ; ( 2 ) imputed interest expense ; and ( 3 ) land lease expense , representing an imputed cost to lease the underlying land of the building . at the conclusion of the initial lease term , we will de-recognize both the net book values of the asset and the remaining financing obligation . as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , we have recorded assets of $ 53.4 million , representing the total costs of the building and improvements incurred , including the costs paid by the lessor ( the legal owner of the building ) and additional improvement costs paid by us , and a corresponding financing obligation of $ 39.6 million and $ 41.2 million , respectively . as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 1.9 million and $ 37.7 million were recorded as short-term and long-term financing obligations , respectively . land lease expense under our lease financing obligation amounted to $ 1.3 million for each of the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 respectively. .

Question: what are the total financial obligations as of december 31 , 2107?
Answer: 39.6
Calculation: add(1.9, 37.7)
entergy louisiana , llc and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities . results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased $ 242.5 million primarily due to a settlement with the irs related to the mark-to-market income tax treatment of power purchase contracts , which resulted in a $ 422 million income tax benefit . the net income effect was partially offset by a $ 199 million regulatory charge , which reduced net revenue , because a portion of the benefit will be shared with customers . see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing . 2010 compared to 2009 net income decreased slightly by $ 1.4 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses , a higher effective income tax rate , and higher interest expense , almost entirely offset by higher net revenue . net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 . amount ( in millions ) .

Table: amount ( in millions ) 2010 net revenue $ 1043.7 mark-to-market tax settlement sharing -195.9 ( 195.9 ) retail electric price 32.5 volume/weather 11.6 other -5.7 ( 5.7 ) 2011 net revenue $ 886.2

the mark-to-market tax settlement sharing variance results from a regulatory charge because a portion of the benefits of a settlement with the irs related to the mark-to-market income tax treatment of power purchase contracts will be shared with customers , slightly offset by the amortization of a portion of that charge beginning in october 2011 . see notes 3 and 8 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing . the retail electric price variance is primarily due to a formula rate plan increase effective may 2011 . see note 2 to the financial statements for discussion of the formula rate plan increase. .

Question: what is change in percentage points in net income margin in 2011?
Answer: 27.4
Calculation: divide(242.5, 886.2)
the table below summarizes activity of rsus with performance conditions for the year ended december 31 , shares ( in thousands ) weighted average grant date fair value ( per share ) .

Table: shares ( in thousands ) weightedaverage grantdate fair value ( per share ) non-vested total as of december 31 2016 309 $ 55.94 granted 186 63.10 vested -204 ( 204 ) 46.10 forfeited -10 ( 10 ) 70.50 non-vested total as of december 31 2017 281 $ 67.33

as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to the nonvested rsus , with and without performance conditions , is expected to be recognized over the weighted-average remaining life of 1.5 years . the total fair value of rsus , with and without performance conditions , vested was $ 16 million , $ 14 million and $ 12 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . if dividends are paid with respect to shares of the company 2019s common stock before the rsus are distributed , the company credits a liability for the value of the dividends that would have been paid if the rsus were shares of company common stock . when the rsus are distributed , the company pays the participant a lump sum cash payment equal to the value of the dividend equivalents accrued . the company accrued dividend equivalents totaling less than $ 1 million , $ 1 million and $ 1 million to accumulated deficit in the accompanying consolidated statements of changes in stockholders 2019 equity for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . employee stock purchase plan the company maintains a nonqualified employee stock purchase plan ( the 201cespp 201d ) through which employee participants may use payroll deductions to acquire company common stock at the lesser of 90% ( 90 % ) of the fair market value of the common stock at either the beginning or the end of a three-month purchase period . on february 15 , 2017 , the board adopted the american water works company , inc . and its designated subsidiaries 2017 nonqualified employee stock purchase plan , which was approved by stockholders on may 12 , 2017 and took effect on august 5 , 2017 . the prior plan was terminated as to new purchases of company stock effective august 31 , 2017 . as of december 31 , 2017 , there were 2.0 million shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the espp . the espp is considered compensatory . during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , the company issued 93 thousand , 93 thousand and 98 thousand shares , respectively , under the espp. .

Question: on december 31 , 2017 what is the estimated unrecognized compensation cost related to the non vested rsus , with and without performance conditions , is expected to be recognized as of december 31 , 2018 in millions
Answer: 4
Calculation: divide(const_6, 1.5)
Explanation: the of total unrecognized compensation cost related to the nonvested rsus , with and without performance conditions , is expected to be recognized is 6 millon to be recognized over 1.5 years , thus the annual amount is equal to 6/1.5=4
performance graph the table below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock with the cumulative total return of ( i ) the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) , ( ii ) the standard & poor 2019s industrials index ( 201cs&p industrials index 201d ) and ( iii ) the standard & poor 2019s consumer durables & apparel index ( 201cs&p consumer durables & apparel index 201d ) , from december 31 , 2005 through december 31 , 2010 , when the closing price of our common stock was $ 12.66 . the graph assumes investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2005 in our common stock and in each of the three indices and the reinvestment of dividends . performance graph 201020092008200720062005 s&p 500 index s&p industrials index s&p consumer durables & apparel index the table below sets forth the value , as of december 31 for each of the years indicated , of a $ 100 investment made on december 31 , 2005 in each of our common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p industrials index and the s&p consumer durables & apparel index and includes the reinvestment of dividends. .

Table: 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 masco $ 101.79 $ 76.74 $ 42.81 $ 54.89 $ 51.51 s&p 500 index $ 115.61 $ 121.95 $ 77.38 $ 97.44 $ 111.89 s&p industrials index $ 113.16 $ 126.72 $ 76.79 $ 92.30 $ 116.64 s&p consumer durables & apparel index $ 106.16 $ 84.50 $ 56.13 $ 76.51 $ 99.87

in july 2007 , our board of directors authorized the purchase of up to 50 million shares of our common stock in open-market transactions or otherwise . at december 31 , 2010 , we had remaining authorization to repurchase up to 27 million shares . during 2010 , we repurchased and retired three million shares of our common stock , for cash aggregating $ 45 million to offset the dilutive impact of the 2010 grant of three million shares of long-term stock awards . we did not purchase any shares during the three months ended december 31 , 2010. .

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return on masco common stock for the five year period ended 2010?
Answer: -48.49%
Calculation: divide(subtract(51.51, 100), 100)
shareholder return performance the line graph below compares the annual percentage change in ball corporation fffds cumulative total shareholder return on its common stock with the cumulative total return of the dow jones containers & packaging index and the s&p composite 500 stock index for the five-year period ended december 31 , 2011 . it assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2006 , and that all dividends were reinvested . the dow jones containers & packaging index total return has been weighted by market capitalization . total return to stockholders ( assumes $ 100 investment on 12/31/06 ) total return analysis .

Table: 12/31/2006 12/31/2007 12/31/2008 12/31/2009 12/31/2010 12/31/2011 ball corporation $ 100.00 $ 104.05 $ 97.04 $ 121.73 $ 161.39 $ 170.70 dj us containers & packaging $ 100.00 $ 106.73 $ 66.91 $ 93.98 $ 110.23 $ 110.39 s&p 500 $ 100.00 $ 105.49 $ 66.46 $ 84.05 $ 96.71 $ 98.75

copyright a9 2012 standard & poor fffds , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm ) copyright a9 2012 dow jones & company . all rights reserved. .

Question: what was the five year percentage return on ball corporation stock?
Answer: 171%
Calculation: divide(170.70, 100.00)
table of contents part ii , item 8 schlumberger limited ( schlumberger n.v. , incorporated in the netherlands antilles ) and subsidiary companies shares of common stock issued treasury shares outstanding .

Table: issued in treasury shares outstanding balance january 1 2001 667085793 -94361099 ( 94361099 ) 572724694 employee stock purchase plan 2013 1752833 1752833 shares granted to directors 2013 4800 4800 shares sold to optionees 8385 1399686 1408071 balance december 31 2001 667094178 -91203780 ( 91203780 ) 575890398 employee stock purchase plan 2013 2677842 2677842 shares granted to directors 2013 3500 3500 shares sold to optionees 10490 2243400 2253890 acquisition of technoguide 2013 1347485 1347485 balance december 31 2002 667104668 -84931553 ( 84931553 ) 582173115 employee stock purchase plan 2013 2464088 2464088 shares granted to directors 2013 3500 3500 shares sold to optionees 1320 1306305 1307625 balance december 31 2003 667105988 -81157660 ( 81157660 ) 585948328

see the notes to consolidated financial statements 39 / slb 2003 form 10-k .

Question: the acquisition of technoguide accounted for what percentage of shares outstanding?
Answer: 0.2%
Calculation: divide(1347485, 582173115)
purchases of equity securities 2013 during 2018 , we repurchased 57669746 shares of our common stock at an average price of $ 143.70 . the following table presents common stock repurchases during each month for the fourth quarter of 2018 : period total number of shares purchased [a] average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announced plan or program [b] maximum number of shares remaining under the plan or program [b] .

Table: period total number of shares purchased [a] average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announcedplan or program [b] maximum number of shares remaining under the plan or program [b] oct . 1 through oct . 31 6091605 $ 158.20 6087727 32831024 nov . 1 through nov . 30 3408467 147.91 3402190 29428834 dec . 1 through dec . 31 3007951 148.40 3000715 26428119 total 12508023 $ 153.04 12490632 n/a

[a] total number of shares purchased during the quarter includes approximately 17391 shares delivered or attested to upc by employees to pay stock option exercise prices , satisfy excess tax withholding obligations for stock option exercises or vesting of retention units , and pay withholding obligations for vesting of retention shares . [b] effective january 1 , 2017 , our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to 120 million shares of our common stock by december 31 , 2020 . these repurchases may be made on the open market or through other transactions . our management has sole discretion with respect to determining the timing and amount of these transactions. .

Question: what percent of share repurchases took place in the fourth quarter?
Answer: 21.7%
Calculation: divide(12508023, 57669746)
28 , 35 , or 90 days . the funds associated with failed auctions will not be accessible until a successful auction occurs or a buyer is found outside of the auction process . based on broker- dealer valuation models and an analysis of other-than-temporary impairment factors , auction rate securities with an original par value of approximately $ 34 million were written-down to an estimated fair value of $ 16 million as of december 31 , 2007 . this write-down resulted in an 201cother-than-temporary 201d impairment charge of approximately $ 8 million ( pre-tax ) included in net income and a temporary impairment charge of $ 10 million ( pre-tax ) reflected as an unrealized loss within other comprehensive income for 2007 . as of december 31 , 2007 , these investments in auction rate securities have been in a loss position for less than six months . these auction rate securities are classified as non-current marketable securities as of december 31 , 2007 as indicated in the preceding table . 3m reviews impairments associated with the above in accordance with emerging issues task force ( eitf ) 03-1 and fsp sfas 115-1 and 124-1 , 201cthe meaning of other-than-temporary-impairment and its application to certain investments , 201d to determine the classification of the impairment as 201ctemporary 201d or 201cother-than-temporary . 201d a temporary impairment charge results in an unrealized loss being recorded in the other comprehensive income component of stockholders 2019 equity . such an unrealized loss does not reduce net income for the applicable accounting period because the loss is not viewed as other-than-temporary . the company believes that a portion of the impairment of its auction rate securities investments is temporary and a portion is other-than-temporary . the factors evaluated to differentiate between temporary and other-than-temporary include the projected future cash flows , credit ratings actions , and assessment of the credit quality of the underlying collateral . the balance at december 31 , 2007 for marketable securities and short-term investments by contractual maturity are shown below . actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because the issuers of the securities may have the right to prepay obligations without prepayment penalties . dec . 31 , ( millions ) 2007 .

Table: ( millions ) dec . 31 2007 due in one year or less $ 231 due after one year through three years 545 due after three years through five years 221 due after five years 62 total marketable securities $ 1059

predetermined intervals , usually every 7 .

Question: what is the percent of the securities due in one year or less to the total balance
Answer: 21.8%
Calculation: divide(231, 1059)
acquired is represented by allied 2019s infrastructure of market-based collection routes and its related integrated waste transfer and disposal channels , whose value has been included in goodwill . all of the goodwill and other intangible assets resulting from the allied acquisition are not deductible for income tax purposes . pro forma information the consolidated financial statements presented for republic include the operating results of allied from december 5 , 2008 , the date of the acquisition . the following pro forma information is presented assuming the acquisition had been completed as of january 1 , 2008 . the unaudited pro forma information presented has been prepared for illustrative purposes and is not intended to be indicative of the results of operations that would have actually occurred had the acquisition been consummated at the beginning of the periods presented or of future results of the combined operations . furthermore , the pro forma results do not give effect to all cost savings or incremental costs that occur as a result of the integration and consolidation of the acquisition ( in millions , except share and per share amounts ) . year ended december 31 , ( unaudited ) .

Table: year ended december 31 2008 ( unaudited ) revenue $ 9362.2 net income 285.7 basic earnings per share 0.76 diluted earnings per share 0.75

the unaudited pro forma financial information includes adjustments for amortization of identifiable intangible assets , accretion of discounts to fair value associated with debt , environmental , self-insurance and other liabilities , accretion of capping , closure and post-closure obligations and amortization of the related assets , and provision for income taxes . restructuring charges as a result of the 2008 allied acquisition , we committed to a restructuring plan related to our corporate overhead and other administrative and operating functions . the plan included closing our corporate office in florida , consolidating administrative functions to arizona , the former headquarters of allied , and reducing staffing levels . the plan also included closing and consolidating certain operating locations and terminating certain leases . during the years ended december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , we incurred $ 11.4 million , net of adjustments , and $ 63.2 million , respectively , of restructuring and integration charges related to our integration of allied . these charges and adjustments primarily related to severance and other employee termination and relocation benefits and consulting and professional fees . substantially all the charges are recorded in our corporate segment . we do not expect to incur additional charges to complete our plan . we expect that the remaining charges will be paid during 2011 . republic services , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements , continued .

Question: what was the ratio of the restructuring and integration charges related to our integration of allied for 2009 to 2010
Answer: 23.1
Calculation: divide(63.2, 11.4)
Explanation: the ratio of the restructuring and integration charges related to our integration of allied for 2009 to 2010 was 23 to 1