bevaya/FinQA huggingface dataset:
for intangible assets subject to amortization , the estimated aggregate amortization expense for each of the five succeeding fiscal years is as follows : 2009 - $ 41.1 million , 2010 - $ 27.3 million , 2011 - $ 20.9 million , 2012 - $ 17.0 million , and 2013 - $ 12.0 million . fees and expenses related to the merger totaled $ 102.6 million , principally consisting of investment banking fees , legal fees and stock compensation ( $ 39.4 million as further discussed in note 10 ) , and are reflected in the 2007 results of operations . capitalized debt issuance costs as of the merger date of $ 87.4 million for merger-related financing were reflected in other long- term assets in the consolidated balance sheet . the following represents the unaudited pro forma results of the company 2019s consolidated operations as if the merger had occurred on february 3 , 2007 and february 4 , 2006 , respectively , after giving effect to certain adjustments , including the depreciation and amortization of the assets acquired based on their estimated fair values and changes in interest expense resulting from changes in consolidated debt ( in thousands ) : ( in thousands ) year ended february 1 , year ended february 2 .

Table: ( in thousands ) year endedfebruary 12008 year endedfebruary 22007 revenue $ 9495246 $ 9169822 net loss -57939 ( 57939 ) ( 156188 )

the pro forma information does not purport to be indicative of what the company 2019s results of operations would have been if the acquisition had in fact occurred at the beginning of the periods presented , and is not intended to be a projection of the company 2019s future results of operations . subsequent to the announcement of the merger agreement , the company and its directors , along with other parties , were named in seven putative class actions filed in tennessee state courts alleging claims for breach of fiduciary duty arising out of the proposed merger , all as described more fully under 201clegal proceedings 201d in note 8 below . 3 . strategic initiatives during 2006 , the company began implementing certain strategic initiatives related to its historical inventory management and real estate strategies , as more fully described below . inventory management in november 2006 , the company undertook an initiative to discontinue its historical inventory packaway model for virtually all merchandise by the end of fiscal 2007 . under the packaway model , certain unsold inventory items ( primarily seasonal merchandise ) were stored on-site and returned to the sales floor until the items were eventually sold , damaged or discarded . through end-of-season and other markdowns , this initiative resulted in the elimination of seasonal , home products and basic clothing packaway merchandise to allow for increased levels of newer , current-season merchandise . in connection with this strategic change , in the third quarter of 2006 the company recorded a reserve for lower of cost or market inventory .

Question: what is the net income margin in 2008?
Answer: 0.6%
Calculation: divide(57939, 9495246)
the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2012 , 2011 , and 2010 ( 1 ) a u.s . subsidiary of the company has a defined benefit obligation of $ 764 million and $ 679 million as of december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively , and uses salary bands to determine future benefit costs rather than rates of compensation increases . rates of compensation increases in the table above do not include amounts related to this specific defined benefit plan . ( 2 ) includes an inflation factor that is used to calculate future periodic benefit cost , but is not used to calculate the benefit obligation . the company establishes its estimated long-term return on plan assets considering various factors , which include the targeted asset allocation percentages , historic returns and expected future returns . the measurement of pension obligations , costs and liabilities is dependent on a variety of assumptions . these assumptions include estimates of the present value of projected future pension payments to all plan participants , taking into consideration the likelihood of potential future events such as salary increases and demographic experience . these assumptions may have an effect on the amount and timing of future contributions . the assumptions used in developing the required estimates include the following key factors : 2022 discount rates ; 2022 salary growth ; 2022 retirement rates ; 2022 inflation ; 2022 expected return on plan assets ; and 2022 mortality rates . the effects of actual results differing from the company 2019s assumptions are accumulated and amortized over future periods and , therefore , generally affect the company 2019s recognized expense in such future periods . sensitivity of the company 2019s pension funded status to the indicated increase or decrease in the discount rate and long-term rate of return on plan assets assumptions is shown below . note that these sensitivities may be asymmetric and are specific to the base conditions at year-end 2012 . they also may not be additive , so the impact of changing multiple factors simultaneously cannot be calculated by combining the individual sensitivities shown . the funded status as of december 31 , 2012 is affected by the assumptions as of that date . pension expense for 2012 is affected by the december 31 , 2011 assumptions . the impact on pension expense from a one percentage point change in these assumptions is shown in the table below ( in millions ) : .

Table: increase of 1% ( 1 % ) in the discount rate $ -48 ( 48 ) decrease of 1% ( 1 % ) in the discount rate 38 increase of 1% ( 1 % ) in the long-term rate of return on plan assets -47 ( 47 ) decrease of 1% ( 1 % ) in the long-term rate of return on plan assets 47

.

Question: was the impact of a decrease of 1% ( 1 % ) in the discount rate greater than the effect of a decrease of 1% ( 1 % ) in the long-term rate of return on plan assets?
Answer: no
Calculation: greater(38, 47)
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities our ordinary shares have been publicly traded since november 17 , 2011 when our ordinary shares were listed and began trading on the new york stock exchange ( 201cnyse 201d ) under the symbol 201cdlph . 201d on december 4 , 2017 , following the spin-off of delphi technologies , the company changed its name to aptiv plc and its nyse symbol to 201captv . 201d as of january 25 , 2019 , there were 2 shareholders of record of our ordinary shares . the following graph reflects the comparative changes in the value from december 31 , 2013 through december 31 , 2018 , assuming an initial investment of $ 100 and the reinvestment of dividends , if any in ( 1 ) our ordinary shares , ( 2 ) the s&p 500 index and ( 3 ) the automotive peer group . historical share prices of our ordinary shares have been adjusted to reflect the separation . historical performance may not be indicative of future shareholder returns . stock performance graph * $ 100 invested on december 31 , 2013 in our stock or in the relevant index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ended december 31 , 2018 . ( 1 ) aptiv plc , adjusted for the distribution of delphi technologies on december 4 , 2017 ( 2 ) s&p 500 2013 standard & poor 2019s 500 total return index ( 3 ) automotive peer group 2013 adient plc , american axle & manufacturing holdings inc , aptiv plc , borgwarner inc , cooper tire & rubber co , cooper- standard holdings inc , dana inc , dorman products inc , ford motor co , garrett motion inc. , general motors co , gentex corp , gentherm inc , genuine parts co , goodyear tire & rubber co , lear corp , lkq corp , meritor inc , motorcar parts of america inc , standard motor products inc , stoneridge inc , superior industries international inc , tenneco inc , tesla inc , tower international inc , visteon corp , wabco holdings inc company index december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 .

Table: company index december 31 2013 december 31 2014 december 31 2015 december 31 2016 december 31 2017 december 31 2018 aptiv plc ( 1 ) $ 100.00 $ 122.75 $ 146.49 $ 117.11 $ 178.46 $ 130.80 s&p 500 ( 2 ) 100.00 113.69 115.26 129.05 157.22 150.33 automotive peer group ( 3 ) 100.00 107.96 108.05 107.72 134.04 106.89

.

Question: what is the difference in percentage performance for aptiv plc versus the s&p 500 for the five year period ending december 31 2018?
Answer: -19.53%
Calculation: subtract(divide(subtract(130.80, const_100), const_100), divide(subtract(150.33, const_100), const_100))
issuer purchases of equity securities during the three months ended december 31 , 2007 , we repurchased 8895570 shares of our class a common stock for an aggregate of $ 385.1 million pursuant to the $ 1.5 billion stock repurchase program publicly announced in february 2007 , as follows : period total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( in millions ) .

Table: period total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( in millions ) october 2007 3493426 $ 43.30 3493426 $ 449.9 november 2007 2891719 $ 44.16 2891719 $ 322.2 december 2007 2510425 $ 44.20 2510425 $ 216.2 total fourth quarter 8895570 $ 43.27 8895570 $ 216.2

( 1 ) issuer repurchases pursuant to the $ 1.5 billion stock repurchase program publicly announced in february 2007 . under this program , our management was authorized through february 2008 to purchase shares from time to time through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions at prevailing prices as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements , and subject to market conditions and other factors . to facilitate repurchases , we typically made purchases pursuant to trading plans under rule 10b5-1 of the exchange act , which allow us to repurchase shares during periods when we otherwise might be prevented from doing so under insider trading laws or because of self-imposed trading blackout periods . subsequent to december 31 , 2007 , we repurchased 4.3 million shares of our class a common stock for an aggregate of $ 163.7 million pursuant to this program . in february 2008 , our board of directors approved a new stock repurchase program , pursuant to which we are authorized to purchase up to an additional $ 1.5 billion of our class a common stock . purchases under this stock repurchase program are subject to us having available cash to fund repurchases , as further described in item 1a of this annual report under the caption 201crisk factors 2014we anticipate that we may need additional financing to fund our stock repurchase programs , to refinance our existing indebtedness and to fund future growth and expansion initiatives 201d and item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources . 201d .

Question: what is the total amount spent for stock repurchase during november 2007 , in millions?
Answer: 127.7
Calculation: divide(multiply(2891719, 44.16), const_1000000)
table of contents index to financial statements item 3 . legal proceedings . item 4 . mine safety disclosures . not applicable . part ii price range our common stock trades on the nasdaq global select market under the symbol 201cmktx 201d . the range of closing price information for our common stock , as reported by nasdaq , was as follows : on february 16 , 2012 , the last reported closing price of our common stock on the nasdaq global select market was $ 32.65 . holders there were 41 holders of record of our common stock as of february 16 , 2012 . dividend policy we initiated a regular quarterly dividend in the fourth quarter of 2009 . during 2010 and 2011 , we paid quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.07 per share and $ 0.09 per share , respectively . in january 2012 , our board of directors approved a quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.11 per share payable on march 1 , 2012 to stockholders of record as of the close of business on february 16 , 2012 . any future declaration and payment of dividends will be at the sole discretion of the company 2019s board of directors . the board of directors may take into account such matters as general business conditions , the company 2019s financial results , capital requirements , contractual , legal , and regulatory restrictions on the payment of dividends to the company 2019s stockholders or by the company 2019s subsidiaries to the parent and any such other factors as the board of directors may deem relevant . recent sales of unregistered securities item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities. .

Table: 2011: high low january 1 2011 to march 31 2011 $ 24.19 $ 19.78 april 1 2011 to june 30 2011 $ 25.22 $ 21.00 july 1 2011 to september 30 2011 $ 30.75 $ 23.41 october 1 2011 to december 31 2011 $ 31.16 $ 24.57 2010: high low january 1 2010 to march 31 2010 $ 16.20 $ 13.25 april 1 2010 to june 30 2010 $ 17.40 $ 13.45 july 1 2010 to september 30 2010 $ 17.30 $ 12.39 october 1 2010 to december 31 2010 $ 20.93 $ 16.93

.

Question: for the period from april 1 2011 to june 30 2011 , what was the difference between high and low stock price?
Answer: 4.22
Calculation: subtract(25.22, 21.00)
in direct competition with other co2 pipelines . we also compete with other interest owners in the mcelmo dome unit and the bravo dome unit for transportation of co2 to the denver city , texas market area . terminals our terminals segment includes the operations of our refined petroleum product , crude oil , chemical , ethanol and other liquid terminal facilities ( other than those included in the products pipelines segment ) and all of our coal , petroleum coke , fertilizer , steel , ores and other dry-bulk terminal facilities . our terminals are located throughout the u.s . and in portions of canada . we believe the location of our facilities and our ability to provide flexibility to customers help attract new and retain existing customers at our terminals and provide expansion opportunities . we often classify our terminal operations based on the handling of either liquids or dry-bulk material products . in addition , terminals 2019 marine operations include jones act qualified product tankers that provide marine transportation of crude oil , condensate and refined petroleum products in the u.s . the following summarizes our terminals segment assets , as of december 31 , 2016 : number capacity ( mmbbl ) .

Table: number capacity ( mmbbl ) liquids terminals 51 85.2 bulk terminals 37 2014 jones act tankers 12 4.0

competition we are one of the largest independent operators of liquids terminals in north america , based on barrels of liquids terminaling capacity . our liquids terminals compete with other publicly or privately held independent liquids terminals , and terminals owned by oil , chemical , pipeline , and refining companies . our bulk terminals compete with numerous independent terminal operators , terminals owned by producers and distributors of bulk commodities , stevedoring companies and other industrial companies opting not to outsource terminaling services . in some locations , competitors are smaller , independent operators with lower cost structures . our jones act qualified product tankers compete with other jones act qualified vessel fleets. .

Question: what is the average capacity in mmbbl of jones act tankers?
Answer: .33
Calculation: divide(const_4, 12)
s c h e d u l e i v ( continued ) ace limited and subsidiaries s u p p l e m e n t a l i n f o r m a t i o n c o n c e r n i n g r e i n s u r a n c e premiums earned for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 , and 2006 ( in millions of u.s . dollars ) direct amount ceded to companies assumed from other companies net amount percentage of amount assumed to .

Table: for the years ended december 31 2008 2007 and 2006 ( in millions of u.s . dollars ) direct amount ceded to other companies assumed from other companies net amount percentage of amount assumed to net 2008 $ 16087 $ 6144 $ 3260 $ 13203 25% ( 25 % ) 2007 $ 14673 $ 5834 $ 3458 $ 12297 28% ( 28 % ) 2006 $ 13562 $ 5198 $ 3461 $ 11825 29% ( 29 % )

.

Question: what is the percentage of amount ceded to direct amount in 2007?
Answer: 39.8%
Calculation: divide(5834, 14673)
item 1b . unresolved staff comments item 2 . properties we employ a variety of assets in the management and operation of our rail business . our rail network covers 23 states in the western two-thirds of the u.s . our rail network includes 31974 route miles . we own 26012 miles and operate on the remainder pursuant to trackage rights or leases . the following table describes track miles at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 . 2014 2013 .

Table: 2014 2013 route 31974 31838 other main line 6943 6766 passing lines and turnouts 3197 3167 switching and classification yard lines 9058 9090 total miles 51172 50861

headquarters building we own our headquarters building in omaha , nebraska . the facility has 1.2 million square feet of space for approximately 4000 employees. .

Question: what is the average number of total track miles per state in the rail network ?
Answer: 2225
Calculation: divide(51172, 23)
22 2016 annual report performance graph the following chart presents a comparison for the five-year period ended june 30 , 2016 , of the market performance of the company 2019s common stock with the s&p 500 index and an index of peer companies selected by the company : comparison of 5 year cumulative total return among jack henry & associates , inc. , the s&p 500 index , and a peer group the following information depicts a line graph with the following values: .

Table: 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 jkhy 100.00 116.62 161.33 206.53 228.24 312.11 peer group 100.00 107.65 126.89 174.28 219.46 251.24 s&p 500 100.00 105.45 127.17 158.46 170.22 177.02

this comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on june 30 , 2011 , and assumes reinvestments of dividends . total returns are calculated according to market capitalization of peer group members at the beginning of each period . peer companies selected are in the business of providing specialized computer software , hardware and related services to financial institutions and other businesses . companies in the peer group are aci worldwide , inc. , bottomline technology , inc. , broadridge financial solutions , cardtronics , inc. , convergys corp. , corelogic , inc. , dst systems , inc. , euronet worldwide , inc. , fair isaac corp. , fidelity national information services , inc. , fiserv , inc. , global payments , inc. , moneygram international , inc. , ss&c technologies holdings , inc. , total systems services , inc. , tyler technologies , inc. , verifone systems , inc. , and wex , inc. . heartland payment systems , inc . was removed from the peer group as it merged with global payments , inc . in april 2016. .

Question: what was the total amount of returns that jkhy , peer group and s&p 500 had made combined by june 30 , 2012?
Answer: 29.72
Calculation: add(subtract(105.45, 100), add(subtract(116.62, 100), subtract(107.65, 100)))
Explanation: the one year growth for each company added up .
j a c k h e n r y . c o m 1 5 market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the company 2019s common stock is quoted on the nasdaq global select market ( 201cnasdaq 201d ) under the symbol 201cjkhy 201d . the company established a practice of paying quarterly dividends at the end of fiscal 1990 and has paid dividends with respect to every quarter since that time . the declaration and payment of any future dividends will continue to be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon , among other factors , our earnings , capital requirements , contractual restrictions , and operating and financial condition . the company does not currently foresee any changes in its dividend practices . on august 15 , 2019 , there were approximately 145300 holders of the company 2019s common stock , including individual participants in security position listings . on that same date the last sale price of the common shares as reported on nasdaq was $ 141.94 per share . issuer purchases of equity securities the following shares of the company were repurchased during the quarter ended june 30 , 2019 : total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) average price of total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans ( 1 ) maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans ( 2 ) .

Table: total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) average price of share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans ( 1 ) maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans ( 2 ) april 1- april 30 2019 2014 $ 2014 2014 3732713 may 1- may 31 2019 250000 $ 134.35 250000 3482713 june 1- june 30 2019 2014 $ 2014 2014 3482713 total 250000 $ 134.35 250000 3482713

( 1 ) 250000 shares were purchased through a publicly announced repurchase plan . there were no shares surrendered to the company to satisfy tax withholding obligations in connection with employee restricted stock awards . ( 2 ) total stock repurchase authorizations approved by the company 2019s board of directors as of february 17 , 2015 were for 30.0 million shares . these authorizations have no specific dollar or share price targets and no expiration dates. .

Question: what was the company market capitalization on august 15 , 2019,
Answer: 20623882
Calculation: multiply(145300, 141.94)