bevaya/FinQA huggingface dataset:
the following table provides a summary of our historical capital expenditures related to the upgrading of our infrastructure and systems: .

Table: ( in millions ) for the years ended december 31 , 2018 for the years ended december 31 , 2017 for the years ended december 31 , 2016 transmission and distribution $ 572 $ 551 $ 568 treatment and pumping 231 171 151 services meter and fire hydrants 303 281 297 general structure and equipment 371 281 202 sources of supply 26 54 59 wastewater 83 96 34 total capital expenditures $ 1586 $ 1434 $ 1311

in 2018 , our capital expenditures increased $ 152 million , or 10.6% ( 10.6 % ) , primarily due to investment across the majority of our infrastructure categories . in 2017 , our capital expenditures increased $ 123 million , or 9.4% ( 9.4 % ) , primarily due to investment in our general structure and equipment and wastewater categories . we also grow our business primarily through acquisitions of water and wastewater systems , as well as other water-related services . these acquisitions are complementary to our existing business and support continued geographical diversification and growth of our operations . generally , acquisitions are funded initially with short- term debt , and later refinanced with the proceeds from long-term debt . the following is a summary of the acquisitions and dispositions affecting our cash flows from investing activities : 2022 the majority of cash paid for acquisitions pertained to the $ 365 million purchase of pivotal within our homeowner services group . 2022 paid $ 33 million for 15 water and wastewater systems , representing approximately 14000 customers . 2022 received $ 35 million for the sale of assets , including $ 27 million for the sale of the majority of the o&m contracts in our contract services group during the third quarter of 2018 . 2022 the majority of cash paid for acquisitions pertained to the $ 159 million purchase of the wastewater collection and treatment system assets of the municipal authority of the city of mckeesport , pennsylvania ( the 201cmckeesport system 201d ) , excluding a $ 5 million non-escrowed deposit made in 2016 . 2022 paid $ 18 million for 16 water and wastewater systems , excluding the mckeesport system and shorelands ( a stock-for-stock transaction ) , representing approximately 7000 customers . 2022 received $ 15 million for the sale of assets . 2022 paid $ 199 million for 15 water and wastewater systems , representing approximately 42000 customers . 2022 made a non-escrowed deposit of $ 5 million related to the mckeesport system acquisition . 2022 received $ 9 million for the sale of assets . as previously noted , we expect to invest between $ 8.0 billion to $ 8.6 billion from 2019 to 2023 , with $ 7.3 billion of this range for infrastructure improvements in our regulated businesses . in 2019 , we expect to .

Question: what percentage of total capital expenditures were related to transmission and distribution in 2018?
Answer: 36.1%
Calculation: divide(572, 1586)
stock performance graph this performance graph shall not be deemed 201cfiled 201d for purposes of section 18 of the exchange act , or incorporated by reference into any filing of quintiles ims holdings , inc . under the exchange act or under the securities act , except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing . the following graph shows a comparison from may 9 , 2013 ( the date our common stock commenced trading on the nyse ) through december 31 , 2016 of the cumulative total return for our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and a select peer group . the peer group consists of cerner corporation , charles river laboratories , inc. , dun & bradstreet corporation , equifax inc. , icon plc , ihs markit ltd. , inc research holdings , laboratory corporation of america holdings , nielsen n.v. , parexel international corporation , inc. , pra health sciences , inc. , thomson reuters corporation and verisk analytics , inc . the companies in our peer group are publicly traded information services , information technology or contract research companies , and thus share similar business model characteristics to quintilesims , or provide services to similar customers as quintilesims . many of these companies are also used by our compensation committee for purposes of compensation benchmarking . the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested in quintilesims , the s&p 500 and the peer group as of the close of market on may 9 , 2013 , assumes the reinvestments of dividends , if any . the s&p 500 and our peer group are included for comparative purposes only . they do not necessarily reflect management 2019s opinion that the s&p 500 and our peer group are an appropriate measure of the relative performance of the stock involved , and they are not intended to forecast or be indicative of possible future performance of our common stock . s&p 500 quintilesims peer group .

Table: 5/9/2013 12/31/2013 12/31/2014 12/31/2015 12/31/2016 q $ 100 $ 110 $ 140 $ 163 $ 181 peer group $ 100 $ 116 $ 143 $ 151 $ 143 s&p 500 $ 100 $ 114 $ 127 $ 126 $ 138

item 6 . selected financial data we have derived the following consolidated statements of income data for 2016 , 2015 and 2014 and consolidated balance sheet data as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 from our audited consolidated financial .

Question: what is the return on investment for q if the investment is sold at the end of year 2014?
Answer: 40%
Calculation: divide(subtract(140, const_100), const_100)
entergy arkansas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 92.9 million primarily due to higher net revenue and lower other operation and maintenance expenses , partially offset by a higher effective income tax rate and higher depreciation and amortization expenses . 2015 compared to 2014 net income decreased $ 47.1 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses , partially offset by higher net revenue . net revenue 2016 compared to 2015 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 . amount ( in millions ) .

Table: amount ( in millions ) 2015 net revenue $ 1362.2 retail electric price 161.5 other -3.2 ( 3.2 ) 2016 net revenue $ 1520.5

the retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in base rates , as approved by the apsc . the new base rates were effective february 24 , 2016 and began billing with the first billing cycle of april 2016 . the increase includes an interim base rate adjustment surcharge , effective with the first billing cycle of april 2016 , to recover the incremental revenue requirement for the period february 24 , 2016 through march 31 , 2016 . a significant portion of the increase is related to the purchase of power block 2 of the union power station . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate case . see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the union power station purchase. .

Question: what was the average trailing two year net revenue amount in 2015?
Answer: 1391.4
Calculation: divide(add(1520.5, 1362.2), const_2)
issuer purchases of equity securities period total number of shares ( or units ) purchased average price paid per share ( or unit ) total number of shares ( or units ) purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( in millions ) month #1 ( october 1 , 2014 october 31 , 2005 ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1119600 $ 34.52 1119600 $ 285.3 month #2 ( november 1 , 2014 november 30 , 2005 ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 738200 36.03 738200 258.7 month #3 ( december 1 , 2014 december 31 , 2005 ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1147700 37.06 1147700 216.2 .

Table: period ( a ) total number of shares ( or units ) purchased ( b ) average price paid per share ( or unit ) ( c ) total number of shares ( or units ) purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs ( d ) maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( in millions ) month #1 ( october 1 2014 october 31 2005 ) 1119600 $ 34.52 1119600 $ 285.3 month #2 ( november 1 2014 november 30 2005 ) 738200 36.03 738200 258.7 month #3 ( december 1 2014 december 31 2005 ) 1147700 37.06 1147700 216.2 total 3005500 $ 35.86 3005500 $ 216.2

the share purchases reflected in the table above were made pursuant to our $ 500.0 million repurchase program approved by our board of directors in april 2005 . this share repurchase program does not have an expiration date . no share repurchase program approved by our board of directors has ever expired nor do we expect to terminate any program prior to completion . we intend to make additional share purchases under our existing repurchase program up to an aggregate of $ 216.2 million and under the additional $ 275.0 million program authorized by our board of directors in january 2006. .

Question: what was the percent of the period month #1 ( october 1 2014 october 31 2005 ) as part of the total of total number of shares ( or units ) purchased
Answer: 37.3%
Calculation: divide(1119600, 3005500)
Explanation: the percent of the period month #1 ( october 1 2014 october 31 2005 ) as part of the total of total number of shares ( or units ) purchased was 37.3 of the total amount
worldwide distribution channels the following table presents the number of doors by geographic location , in which ralph lauren-branded products distributed by our wholesale segment were sold to consumers in our primary channels of distribution as of march 31 , 2012 : location number of .

Table: location number of doors the americas 6587 europe 4377 asia 83 total 11047

in addition , american living and chaps-branded products distributed by our wholesale segment were sold domestically through approximately 1800 doors as of march 31 , 2012 . we have three key wholesale customers that generate significant sales volume . for fiscal 2012 , these customers in the aggregate accounted for approximately 40% ( 40 % ) of total wholesale revenues , with macy 2019s , inc . representing approximately 20% ( 20 % ) of total wholesale revenues . our product brands are sold primarily through our own sales forces . our wholesale segment maintains its primary showrooms in new york city . in addition , we maintain regional showrooms in chicago , dallas , milan , paris , london , munich , madrid , stockholm and tokyo . shop-within-shops . as a critical element of our distribution to department stores , we and our licensing partners utilize shop-within-shops to enhance brand recognition , to permit more complete merchandising of our lines by the department stores and to differentiate the presentation of products . shop-within- shop fixed assets primarily include items such as customized freestanding fixtures , wall cases and components , decorative items and flooring . as of march 31 , 2012 , we had approximately 18000 shop-within-shops dedicated to our ralph lauren-branded wholesale products worldwide . the size of our shop-within-shops ranges from approximately 300 to 7400 square feet . we normally share in the cost of building-out these shop-within-shops with our wholesale customers . basic stock replenishment program . basic products such as knit shirts , chino pants , oxford cloth shirts , and selected accessories ( including footwear ) and home products can be ordered at any time through our basic stock replenishment programs . we generally ship these products within two-to-five days of order receipt . our retail segment as of march 31 , 2012 , our retail segment consisted of 379 stores worldwide , totaling approximately 2.9 million gross square feet , 474 concessions- based shop-within-shops and six e-commerce websites . the extension of our direct-to-consumer reach is a primary long-term strategic goal . ralph lauren retail stores our ralph lauren retail stores reinforce the luxury image and distinct sensibility of our brands and feature exclusive lines that are not sold in domestic department stores . we opened 10 new ralph lauren stores , acquired 3 previously licensed stores , and closed 16 ralph lauren stores in fiscal 2012 . our retail stores are primarily situated in major upscale street locations and upscale regional malls , generally in large urban markets. .

Question: what percentage of worldwide distribution channels doors as of march 31 , 2012 where in europe ?
Answer: 40%
Calculation: divide(4377, 11047)
entergy new orleans , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities . results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased $ 4.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , lower taxes other than income taxes , a lower effective income tax rate , and lower interest expense , partially offset by lower net revenue . 2010 compared to 2009 net income remained relatively unchanged , increasing $ 0.6 million , primarily due to higher net revenue and lower interest expense , almost entirely offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses , higher taxes other than income taxes , lower other income , and higher depreciation and amortization expenses . net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 . amount ( in millions ) .

Table: amount ( in millions ) 2010 net revenue $ 272.9 retail electric price -16.9 ( 16.9 ) net gas revenue -9.1 ( 9.1 ) gas cost recovery asset -3.0 ( 3.0 ) volume/weather 5.4 other -2.3 ( 2.3 ) 2011 net revenue $ 247.0

the retail electric price variance is primarily due to formula rate plan decreases effective october 2010 and october 2011 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . the net gas revenue variance is primarily due to milder weather in 2011 compared to 2010 . the gas cost recovery asset variance is primarily due to the recognition in 2010 of a $ 3 million gas operations regulatory asset associated with the settlement of entergy new orleans 2019s electric and gas formula rate plan case and the amortization of that asset . see note 2 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the formula rate plan settlement. .

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenue from 2010 to 2011?
Answer: -9.5%
Calculation: divide(subtract(247.0, 272.9), 272.9)
sales of unregistered securities not applicable . repurchases of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of our equity securities during the period from october 1 , 2017 to december 31 , 2017 . total number of shares ( or units ) purchased 1 average price paid per share ( or unit ) 2 total number of shares ( or units ) purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs 3 maximum number ( or approximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs 3 .

Table: total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased1 average price paidper share ( or unit ) 2 total number ofshares ( or units ) purchased as part ofpublicly announcedplans or programs3 maximum number ( orapproximate dollar value ) of shares ( or units ) that may yet be purchasedunder the plans orprograms3 october 1 - 31 1231868 $ 20.74 1230394 $ 214001430 november 1 - 30 1723139 $ 18.89 1722246 $ 181474975 december 1 - 31 1295639 $ 20.25 1285000 $ 155459545 total 4250646 $ 19.84 4237640

1 included shares of our common stock , par value $ 0.10 per share , withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock-based compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares ( the 201cwithheld shares 201d ) . we repurchased 1474 withheld shares in october 2017 , 893 withheld shares in november 2017 and 10639 withheld shares in december 2017 , for a total of 13006 withheld shares during the three-month period . 2 the average price per share for each of the months in the fiscal quarter and for the three-month period was calculated by dividing the sum of the applicable period of the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations and the aggregate amount we paid for shares acquired under our share repurchase program , described in note 5 to the consolidated financial statements , by the sum of the number of withheld shares and the number of shares acquired in our share repurchase program . 3 in february 2017 , the board authorized a share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock ( the 201c2017 share repurchase program 201d ) . on february 14 , 2018 , we announced that our board had approved a new share repurchase program to repurchase from time to time up to $ 300.0 million , excluding fees , of our common stock . the new authorization is in addition to any amounts remaining for repurchase under the 2017 share repurchase program . there is no expiration date associated with the share repurchase programs. .

Question: what is the total cash outflow for the repurchase of shares in the last three months of year , ( in millions ) ?
Answer: 84.3
Calculation: divide(multiply(4250646, 19.84), const_1000000)
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our class a common stock on the new york stock exchange ( 201cnyse 201d ) for the years 2007 and 2006. .

Table: 2007 high low quarter ended march 31 $ 41.31 $ 36.63 quarter ended june 30 43.84 37.64 quarter ended september 30 45.45 36.34 quarter ended december 31 46.53 40.08 2006 high low quarter ended march 31 $ 32.68 $ 26.66 quarter ended june 30 35.75 27.35 quarter ended september 30 36.92 29.98 quarter ended december 31 38.74 35.21

on february 29 , 2008 , the closing price of our class a common stock was $ 38.44 per share as reported on the nyse . as of february 29 , 2008 , we had 395748826 outstanding shares of class a common stock and 528 registered holders . dividends we have never paid a dividend on any class of our common stock . we anticipate that we may retain future earnings , if any , to fund the development and growth of our business . the indentures governing our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 201c7.50% ( 201c7.50 % ) notes 201d ) and our 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 201c7.125% ( 201c7.125 % ) notes 201d ) may prohibit us from paying dividends to our stockholders unless we satisfy certain financial covenants . the loan agreement for our revolving credit facility and the indentures governing the terms of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes contain covenants that restrict our ability to pay dividends unless certain financial covenants are satisfied . in addition , while spectrasite and its subsidiaries are classified as unrestricted subsidiaries under the indentures for our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes , certain of spectrasite 2019s subsidiaries are subject to restrictions on the amount of cash that they can distribute to us under the loan agreement related to our securitization . for more information about the restrictions under the loan agreement for the revolving credit facility , our notes indentures and the loan agreement related to the securitization , see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources 2014factors affecting sources of liquidity 201d and note 3 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. .

Question: what was the fair value of class a stockholders equity at february 29 , 2008?\\n .
Answer: 15212558400
Calculation: multiply(38.44, 395748826)
the following table presents tower cash flow , adjusted consolidated cash flow and non-tower cash flow for the company and its restricted subsidiaries , as defined in the indentures for the applicable notes ( in thousands ) : .

Table: tower cash flow for the three months ended december 31 2007 $ 177724 consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2007 $ 668123 less : tower cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2007 -683200 ( 683200 ) plus : four times tower cash flow for the three months ended december 31 2007 710896 adjusted consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2007 $ 695819 non-tower cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2007 $ -48012 ( 48012 )

.

Question: what portion of consolidated cashflow for the twelve months ended december 31 , 2007 is related to tower cash flow twelve months?
Answer: 102.3%
Calculation: divide(683200, 668123)
stock performance graph this performance graph shall not be deemed 201cfiled 201d for purposes of section 18 of the exchange act , or incorporated by reference into any filing of quintiles ims holdings , inc . under the exchange act or under the securities act , except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing . the following graph shows a comparison from may 9 , 2013 ( the date our common stock commenced trading on the nyse ) through december 31 , 2016 of the cumulative total return for our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and a select peer group . the peer group consists of cerner corporation , charles river laboratories , inc. , dun & bradstreet corporation , equifax inc. , icon plc , ihs markit ltd. , inc research holdings , laboratory corporation of america holdings , nielsen n.v. , parexel international corporation , inc. , pra health sciences , inc. , thomson reuters corporation and verisk analytics , inc . the companies in our peer group are publicly traded information services , information technology or contract research companies , and thus share similar business model characteristics to quintilesims , or provide services to similar customers as quintilesims . many of these companies are also used by our compensation committee for purposes of compensation benchmarking . the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested in quintilesims , the s&p 500 and the peer group as of the close of market on may 9 , 2013 , assumes the reinvestments of dividends , if any . the s&p 500 and our peer group are included for comparative purposes only . they do not necessarily reflect management 2019s opinion that the s&p 500 and our peer group are an appropriate measure of the relative performance of the stock involved , and they are not intended to forecast or be indicative of possible future performance of our common stock . s&p 500 quintilesims peer group .

Table: 5/9/2013 12/31/2013 12/31/2014 12/31/2015 12/31/2016 q $ 100 $ 110 $ 140 $ 163 $ 181 peer group $ 100 $ 116 $ 143 $ 151 $ 143 s&p 500 $ 100 $ 114 $ 127 $ 126 $ 138

item 6 . selected financial data we have derived the following consolidated statements of income data for 2016 , 2015 and 2014 and consolidated balance sheet data as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 from our audited consolidated financial .

Question: in 2013 what was the anticipated percentage growth in the stock performance for the peer group in 2014
Answer: 43%
Calculation: divide(subtract(143, 100), 100)