bevaya/FinQA huggingface dataset:
jpmorgan chase & co./2009 annual report 173 trading assets and liabilities average balances average trading assets and liabilities were as follows for the periods indicated. .

Table: year ended december 31 ( in millions ) 2009 2008 2007 trading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments $ 318063 $ 384102 $ 381415 trading assets 2013 derivative receivables 110457 121417 65439 trading liabilities 2013 debt and equityinstruments ( a ) $ 60224 $ 78841 $ 94737 trading liabilities 2013 derivative payables 77901 93200 65198

( a ) primarily represent securities sold , not yet purchased . note 4 2013 fair value option the fair value option provides an option to elect fair value as an alternative measurement for selected financial assets , financial liabilities , unrecognized firm commitments , and written loan com- mitments not previously carried at fair value . elections elections were made by the firm to : 2022 mitigate income statement volatility caused by the differences in the measurement basis of elected instruments ( for example , cer- tain instruments elected were previously accounted for on an accrual basis ) while the associated risk management arrange- ments are accounted for on a fair value basis ; 2022 eliminate the complexities of applying certain accounting models ( e.g. , hedge accounting or bifurcation accounting for hybrid in- struments ) ; and 2022 better reflect those instruments that are managed on a fair value basis . elections include : 2022 securities financing arrangements with an embedded derivative and/or a maturity of greater than one year . 2022 loans purchased or originated as part of securitization ware- housing activity , subject to bifurcation accounting , or managed on a fair value basis . 2022 structured notes issued as part of ib 2019s client-driven activities . ( structured notes are financial instruments that contain embed- ded derivatives. ) 2022 certain tax credits and other equity investments acquired as part of the washington mutual transaction . the cumulative effect on retained earnings of the adoption of the fair value option on january 1 , 2007 , was $ 199 million. .

Question: excluding derivatives , what are net 2008 trading assets , in millions?
Answer: 305261
Calculation: subtract(384102, 78841)
24 2017 annual report performance graph the following chart presents a comparison for the five-year period ended june 30 , 2017 , of the market performance of the company 2019s common stock with the s&p 500 index and an index of peer companies selected by the company : comparison of 5 year cumulative total return among jack henry & associates , inc. , the s&p 500 index , and a peer group the following information depicts a line graph with the following values: .

Table: 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 jkhy 100.00 138.34 177.10 195.72 267.64 322.60 peer group 100.00 117.87 161.90 203.87 233.39 271.10 s&p 500 100.00 120.60 150.27 161.43 167.87 197.92

this comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on june 30 , 2012 , and assumes reinvestments of dividends . total returns are calculated according to market capitalization of peer group members at the beginning of each period . peer companies selected are in the business of providing specialized computer software , hardware and related services to financial institutions and other businesses . companies in the peer group are aci worldwide , inc. ; bottomline technology , inc. ; broadridge financial solutions ; cardtronics , inc. ; convergys corp. ; corelogic , inc. ; dst systems , inc. ; euronet worldwide , inc. ; fair isaac corp. ; fidelity national information services , inc. ; fiserv , inc. ; global payments , inc. ; moneygram international , inc. ; ss&c technologies holdings , inc. ; total systems services , inc. ; tyler technologies , inc. ; verifone systems , inc. ; and wex , inc.. .

Question: jkhy's total 5 year return was what percent of the peer group?
Answer: 119%
Calculation: divide(322.60, 271.10)
the fair value of our total investments increased $ 4.8 billion during 2010 , primarily due to unrealized appreciation , the inves- ting of operating cash flows , and the portfolios acquired in the 2010 corporate acquisitions . the following tables show the market value of our fixed maturities and short-term investments at december 31 , 2010 and 2009 . the first table lists investments according to type and the second according to s&p credit rating. .

Table: ( in millions of u.s . dollars except for percentages ) 2010 market value 2010 percentage of total 2010 market value percentageof total treasury $ 2075 4% ( 4 % ) $ 2068 5% ( 5 % ) agency 2015 4% ( 4 % ) 2698 6% ( 6 % ) corporate and asset-backed securities 15900 33% ( 33 % ) 13537 30% ( 30 % ) mortgage-backed securities 12362 25% ( 25 % ) 11311 25% ( 25 % ) municipal 2449 5% ( 5 % ) 2300 5% ( 5 % ) non-u.s . 12199 25% ( 25 % ) 11172 25% ( 25 % ) short-term investments 1983 4% ( 4 % ) 1667 4% ( 4 % ) total $ 48983 100% ( 100 % ) $ 44753 100% ( 100 % ) aaa $ 23718 48% ( 48 % ) $ 22884 51% ( 51 % ) aa 4714 10% ( 10 % ) 4021 9% ( 9 % ) a 8482 17% ( 17 % ) 7461 17% ( 17 % ) bbb 5487 11% ( 11 % ) 4910 11% ( 11 % ) bb 3357 7% ( 7 % ) 2866 6% ( 6 % ) b 2393 5% ( 5 % ) 2029 5% ( 5 % ) other 832 2% ( 2 % ) 582 1% ( 1 % ) total $ 48983 100% ( 100 % ) $ 44753 100% ( 100 % )

.

Question: what is the percentage change in the balance of treasury in 2010?
Answer: 0.3%
Calculation: divide(subtract(2075, 2068), 2068)
item 1b . unresolved staff comments not applicable . item 2 . properties as of december 26 , 2015 , our major facilities consisted of : ( square feet in millions ) united states countries total owned facilities1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30.7 17.2 47.9 leased facilities2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.1 6.0 8.1 .

Table: ( square feet in millions ) unitedstates othercountries total owned facilities1 30.7 17.2 47.9 leased facilities2 2.1 6.0 8.1 total facilities 32.8 23.2 56.0

1 leases on portions of the land used for these facilities expire on varying dates through 2062 . 2 leases expire on varying dates through 2030 and generally include renewals at our option . our principal executive offices are located in the u.s . and a majority of our wafer fabrication activities are also located in the u.s . we completed construction of development fabrication facilities in oregon during 2014 that we expect will enable us to maintain our process technology lead . we also completed construction of a large-scale fabrication building in arizona in 2013 . a portion of the new oregon and arizona facilities are currently not in use and we are reserving the new buildings for additional capacity and future technologies . incremental construction and equipment installation are required to ready the facilities for their intended use . our massachusetts fabrication facility was our last manufacturing facility on 200mm wafers and ceased production in q1 2015 . outside the u.s. , we have wafer fabrication facilities in ireland , israel , and china . our fabrication facility in ireland has transitioned to our 14nm process technology , with manufacturing continuing to ramp in 2016 . additionally , in the second half of 2016 , we will start using our facility in dalian , china to help expand our manufacturing capacity in next-generation memory . our assembly and test facilities are located in malaysia , china , and vietnam . in addition , we have sales and marketing offices worldwide that are generally located near major concentrations of customers . we believe that the facilities described above are suitable and adequate for our present purposes and that the productive capacity in our facilities is substantially being utilized or we have plans to utilize it . we do not identify or allocate assets by operating segment . for information on net property , plant and equipment by country , see 201cnote 26 : operating segments and geographic information 201d in part ii , item 8 of this form 10-k . item 3 . legal proceedings for a discussion of legal proceedings , see 201cnote 25 : contingencies 201d in part ii , item 8 of this form 10-k . item 4 . mine safety disclosures not applicable. .

Question: what percentage of total facilities as measured in square feet are owned?
Answer: 86%
Calculation: divide(47.9, 56.0)
the fair value measurements of the borrowings under our credit agreement and receivables facility are classified as level 2 within the fair value hierarchy since they are determined based upon significant inputs observable in the market , including interest rates on recent financing transactions with similar terms and maturities . we estimated the fair value by calculating the upfront cash payment a market participant would require at december 31 , 2016 to assume these obligations . the fair value of our notes is classified as level 1 within the fair value hierarchy since it is determined based upon observable market inputs including quoted market prices in an active market . the fair value of our euro notes is determined based upon observable market inputs including quoted market prices in a market that is not active , and therefore is classified as level 2 within the fair value hierarchy . note 12 . commitments and contingencies operating leases we are obligated under noncancelable operating leases for corporate office space , warehouse and distribution facilities , trucks and certain equipment . the future minimum lease commitments under these leases at december 31 , 2016 are as follows ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31: .

Table: 2017 $ 200450 2018 168926 2019 136462 2020 110063 2021 82494 thereafter 486199 future minimum lease payments $ 1184594

rental expense for operating leases was approximately $ 211.5 million , $ 168.4 million and $ 148.5 million during the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . we guarantee the residual values of the majority of our truck and equipment operating leases . the residual values decline over the lease terms to a defined percentage of original cost . in the event the lessor does not realize the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be responsible for a portion of the shortfall . similarly , if the lessor realizes more than the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be paid the amount realized over the residual value . had we terminated all of our operating leases subject to these guarantees at december 31 , 2016 , our portion of the guaranteed residual value would have totaled approximately $ 59.0 million . we have not recorded a liability for the guaranteed residual value of equipment under operating leases as the recovery on disposition of the equipment under the leases is expected to approximate the guaranteed residual value . litigation and related contingencies we have certain contingencies resulting from litigation , claims and other commitments and are subject to a variety of environmental and pollution control laws and regulations incident to the ordinary course of business . we currently expect that the resolution of such contingencies will not materially affect our financial position , results of operations or cash flows. .

Question: what was the percentage change in rental expense for operating leases from 2015 to 2016?
Answer: 26%
Calculation: divide(subtract(211.5, 168.4), 168.4)
2 0 1 9 a n n u a l r e p o r t1 6 performance graph the following chart presents a comparison for the five-year period ended june 30 , 2019 , of the market performance of the company 2019s common stock with the s&p 500 index and an index of peer companies selected by the company . historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return among jack henry & associates , inc. , the s&p 500 index , and a peer group the following information depicts a line graph with the following values: .

Table: 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 jkhy 100.00 110.51 151.12 182.15 231.36 240.29 2019 peer group 100.00 126.23 142.94 166.15 224.73 281.09 2018 peer group 100.00 127.40 151.16 177.26 228.97 286.22 s&p 500 100.00 107.42 111.71 131.70 150.64 166.33

this comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on june 30 , 2014 , and assumes reinvestments of dividends . total returns are calculated according to market capitalization of peer group members at the beginning of each period . peer companies selected are in the business of providing specialized computer software , hardware and related services to financial institutions and other businesses . some peer participant companies were different for fiscal year ended 2019 compared to fiscal year ended 2018 . the company 2019s compensation committee of the board of directors adjusted the peer participants due to consolidations within the industry during the 2019 fiscal year . companies in the 2019 peer group are aci worldwide , inc. ; black knight , inc. ; bottomline technologies , inc. ; broadridge financial solutions , inc. ; cardtronics plc ; corelogic , inc. ; euronet worldwide , inc. ; exlservice holdings , inc. ; fair isaac corp. ; fidelity national information services , inc. ; fiserv , inc. ; fleetcor technologies , inc. ; global payments , inc. ; square , inc. ; ss&c technologies holdings , inc. ; total system services , inc. ; tyler technologies , inc. ; verint systems , inc. ; and wex , inc . companies in the 2018 peer group were aci worldwide , inc. ; bottomline technology , inc. ; broadridge financial solutions ; cardtronics , inc. ; corelogic , inc. ; euronet worldwide , inc. ; fair isaac corp. ; fidelity national information services , inc. ; fiserv , inc. ; global payments , inc. ; moneygram international , inc. ; ss&c technologies holdings , inc. ; total systems services , inc. ; tyler technologies , inc. ; verifone .

Question: what was the 5 year total return for jkhy?
Answer: 140.29
Calculation: subtract(240.29, 100.00)
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 comparison of five-year cumulative total shareholder return altria group , inc . altria peer group s&p 500 part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities . performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return of altria group , inc . 2019s common stock for the last ive years with the cumulative total return for the same period of the s&p 500 index and the altria group , inc . peer group ( 1 ) . the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 in common stock and each of the indices as of the market close on december 31 , 2011 and the reinvestment of all dividends on a quarterly basis . source : bloomberg - 201ctotal return analysis 201d calculated on a daily basis and assumes reinvestment of dividends as of the ex-dividend date . ( 1 ) in 2016 , the altria group , inc . peer group consisted of u.s.-headquartered consumer product companies that are competitors to altria group , inc . 2019s tobacco operating companies subsidiaries or that have been selected on the basis of revenue or market capitalization : campbell soup company , the coca-cola company , colgate-palmolive company , conagra brands , inc. , general mills , inc. , the hershey company , kellogg company , kimberly-clark corporation , the kraft heinz company , mondel 0113z international , inc. , pepsico , inc . and reynolds american inc . note - on october 1 , 2012 , kraft foods inc . ( kft ) spun off kraft foods group , inc . ( krft ) to its shareholders and then changed its name from kraft foods inc . to mondel 0113z international , inc . ( mdlz ) . on july 2 , 2015 , kraft foods group , inc . merged with and into a wholly owned subsidiary of h.j . heinz holding corporation , which was renamed the kraft heinz company ( khc ) . on june 12 , 2015 , reynolds american inc . ( rai ) acquired lorillard , inc . ( lo ) . on november 9 , 2016 , conagra foods , inc . ( cag ) spun off lamb weston holdings , inc . ( lw ) to its shareholders and then changed its name from conagra foods , inc . to conagra brands , inc . ( cag ) . .

Table: date altria group inc . altria group inc . peer group s&p 500 december 2011 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 december 2012 $ 111.77 $ 108.78 $ 115.99 december 2013 $ 143.69 $ 135.61 $ 153.55 december 2014 $ 193.28 $ 151.74 $ 174.55 december 2015 $ 237.92 $ 177.04 $ 176.94 december 2016 $ 286.61 $ 192.56 $ 198.09

altria altria group , inc . group , inc . peer group s&p 500 .

Question: what is the roi of an investment in altria group inc . from december 2011 to december 2013?
Answer: 43.7%
Calculation: divide(subtract(143.69, const_100), const_100)
table of contents contractual obligations the company's significant contractual obligations as of december 31 , 2016 are summarized below: .

Table: ( in thousands ) payments due by period total payments due by period within 1 year payments due by period 2 2013 3 years payments due by period 4 2013 5 years payments due by period after 5 years global headquarters operating lease ( 1 ) $ 40859 $ 4278 $ 8556 $ 8928 $ 19097 other operating leases ( 2 ) 29808 9861 12814 4752 2381 unconditional purchase obligations ( 3 ) 37415 14134 20012 3269 2014 obligations related to uncertain tax positions including interest and penalties ( 4 ) 2 2 2014 2014 2014 other long-term obligations ( 5 ) 30846 13292 11472 1763 4319 total contractual obligations $ 138930 $ 41567 $ 52854 $ 18712 $ 25797

( 1 ) on september 14 , 2012 , the company entered into a lease agreement for 186000 square feet of rentable space located in an office facility in canonsburg , pennsylvania , which serves as the company's headquarters . the lease was effective as of september 14 , 2012 , but because the leased premises were under construction , the company was not obligated to pay rent until three months following the date that the leased premises were delivered to ansys , which occurred on october 1 , 2014 . the term of the lease is 183 months , beginning on october 1 , 2014 . the company has a one-time right to terminate the lease effective upon the last day of the tenth full year following the date of possession ( december 31 , 2024 ) by providing the landlord with at least 18 months' prior written notice of such termination . ( 2 ) other operating leases primarily include noncancellable lease commitments for the company's other domestic and international offices as well as certain operating equipment . ( 3 ) unconditional purchase obligations primarily include software licenses and long-term purchase contracts for network , communication and office maintenance services , which are unrecorded as of december 31 , 2016 . ( 4 ) the company has $ 18.4 million of unrecognized tax benefits , including estimated interest and penalties , that have been recorded as liabilities in accordance with income tax accounting guidance for which the company is uncertain as to if or when such amounts may be settled . as a result , such amounts are excluded from the table above . ( 5 ) other long-term obligations primarily include third-party commissions of $ 15.0 million , deferred compensation of $ 7.4 million ( including estimated imputed interest of $ 161000 within 1 year and $ 87000 within 2-3 years ) and post- employment benefits , including pension obligations , of $ 6.5 million for certain foreign locations of the company . these amounts include the related current portions when applicable. .

Question: what is the proportion of total global headquarters leases to total other operating leases?
Answer: 1.371:1
Calculation: divide(40859, 29808)
vertex pharmaceuticals incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) f . marketable securities ( continued ) unrealized losses in the portfolio relate to various debt securities including u.s . government securities , u.s . government-sponsored enterprise securities , corporate debt securities and asset-backed securities . for these securities , the unrealized losses are primarily due to increases in interest rates . the investments held by the company are high investment grade and there were no adverse credit events . because the company has the ability and intent to hold these investments until a recovery of fair value , which may be maturity , the company does not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired as of december 31 , 2006 and 2005 . gross realized gains and losses for 2006 were $ 4000 and $ 88000 respectively . gross realized gains and losses for 2005 were $ 15000 and $ 75000 , respectively . gross realized gains and losses for 2004 were $ 628000 and $ 205000 , respectively . g . restricted cash at december 31 , 2006 and 2005 , the company held $ 30.3 million and $ 41.5 million respectively , in restricted cash . at december 31 , 2006 and 2005 the balance was held in deposit with certain banks predominantly to collateralize conditional stand-by letters of credit in the names of the company 2019s landlords pursuant to certain operating lease agreements . h . property and equipment property and equipment consist of the following at december 31 ( in thousands ) : depreciation and amortization expense for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , 2005 and 2004 was $ 25.4 million , $ 26.3 million and $ 28.4 million , respectively . in 2006 and 2005 , the company wrote off certain assets that were fully depreciated and no longer utilized . there was no effect on the company 2019s net property and equipment . additionally , the company wrote off or sold certain assets that were not fully depreciated . the net loss on disposal of those assets was $ 10000 for 2006 , $ 344000 for 2005 and $ 43000 for 2004 . i . altus investment altus pharmaceuticals , inc . ( 201caltus 201d ) completed an initial public offering in january 2006 . as of the completion of the offering , vertex owned 817749 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 1962494 shares of common stock ( the 201caltus warrants 201d ) . in addition , the company , as of the completion .

Table: 2006 2005 furniture and equipment $ 97638 $ 98387 leasehold improvements 74875 66318 computers 19733 18971 software 21274 18683 total property and equipment gross 213520 202359 less accumulated depreciation and amortization 151985 147826 total property and equipment net $ 61535 $ 54533

furniture and equipment $ 97638 $ 98387 leasehold improvements 74875 66318 computers 19733 18971 software 21274 18683 total property and equipment , gross 213520 202359 less accumulated depreciation and amortization 151985 147826 total property and equipment , net $ 61535 $ 54533 .

Question: in 2006 what was the ratio of the gross realized gains to the losses
Answer: 0.05
Calculation: divide(4000, 88000)