bevaya/FinQA huggingface dataset:
the fair value measurements of the borrowings under our credit agreement and receivables facility are classified as level 2 within the fair value hierarchy since they are determined based upon significant inputs observable in the market , including interest rates on recent financing transactions with similar terms and maturities . we estimated the fair value by calculating the upfront cash payment a market participant would require at december 31 , 2016 to assume these obligations . the fair value of our notes is classified as level 1 within the fair value hierarchy since it is determined based upon observable market inputs including quoted market prices in an active market . the fair value of our euro notes is determined based upon observable market inputs including quoted market prices in a market that is not active , and therefore is classified as level 2 within the fair value hierarchy . note 12 . commitments and contingencies operating leases we are obligated under noncancelable operating leases for corporate office space , warehouse and distribution facilities , trucks and certain equipment . the future minimum lease commitments under these leases at december 31 , 2016 are as follows ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31: .

Table: 2017 $ 200450 2018 168926 2019 136462 2020 110063 2021 82494 thereafter 486199 future minimum lease payments $ 1184594

rental expense for operating leases was approximately $ 211.5 million , $ 168.4 million and $ 148.5 million during the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . we guarantee the residual values of the majority of our truck and equipment operating leases . the residual values decline over the lease terms to a defined percentage of original cost . in the event the lessor does not realize the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be responsible for a portion of the shortfall . similarly , if the lessor realizes more than the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be paid the amount realized over the residual value . had we terminated all of our operating leases subject to these guarantees at december 31 , 2016 , our portion of the guaranteed residual value would have totaled approximately $ 59.0 million . we have not recorded a liability for the guaranteed residual value of equipment under operating leases as the recovery on disposition of the equipment under the leases is expected to approximate the guaranteed residual value . litigation and related contingencies we have certain contingencies resulting from litigation , claims and other commitments and are subject to a variety of environmental and pollution control laws and regulations incident to the ordinary course of business . we currently expect that the resolution of such contingencies will not materially affect our financial position , results of operations or cash flows. .

Question: what was the percentage change in rental expense for operating leases from 2014 to 2015?
Answer: 13%
Calculation: divide(subtract(168.4, 148.5), 148.5)
net impairment we recognized $ 16.9 million and $ 14.9 million of net impairment during the years ended december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively , on certain securities in our non-agency cmo portfolio due to continued deterioration in the expected credit performance of the underlying loans in those specific securities . the gross other-than-temporary impairment ( 201cotti 201d ) and the noncredit portion of otti , which was or had been previously recorded through other comprehensive income ( loss ) , are shown in the table below ( dollars in millions ) : year ended december 31 , 2012 2011 .

Table: year ended december 31 2012 2011 other-than-temporary impairment ( 201cotti 201d ) $ -19.8 ( 19.8 ) $ -9.2 ( 9.2 ) less : noncredit portion of otti recognized into ( out of ) other comprehensive income ( loss ) ( before tax ) 2.9 -5.7 ( 5.7 ) net impairment $ -16.9 ( 16.9 ) $ -14.9 ( 14.9 )

provision for loan losses provision for loan losses decreased 20% ( 20 % ) to $ 354.6 million for the year ended december 31 , 2012 compared to 2011 . the decrease in provision for loan losses was driven primarily by improving credit trends , as evidenced by the lower levels of delinquent loans in the one- to four-family and home equity loan portfolios , and loan portfolio run-off . the decrease was partially offset by $ 50 million in charge-offs associated with newly identified bankruptcy filings during the third quarter of 2012 , with approximately 80% ( 80 % ) related to prior years . we utilize third party loan servicers to obtain bankruptcy data on our borrowers and during the third quarter of 2012 , we identified an increase in bankruptcies reported by one specific servicer . in researching this increase , we discovered that the servicer had not been reporting historical bankruptcy data on a timely basis . as a result , we implemented an enhanced procedure around all servicer reporting to corroborate bankruptcy reporting with independent third party data . through this additional process , approximately $ 90 million of loans were identified in which servicers failed to report the bankruptcy filing to us , approximately 90% ( 90 % ) of which were current at the end of the third quarter of 2012 . as a result , these loans were written down to the estimated current value of the underlying property less estimated selling costs , or approximately $ 40 million , during the third quarter of 2012 . these charge-offs resulted in an increase to provision for loan losses of $ 50 million for the year ended december 31 , 2012 . the provision for loan losses has declined four consecutive years , down 78% ( 78 % ) from its peak of $ 1.6 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2008 . we expect provision for loan losses to continue to decline over the long term , although it is subject to variability in any given quarter. .

Question: what was the change in otti between 2011 and 2012 , in millions?
Answer: 10.6
Calculation: subtract(19.8, 9.2)
stock performance graph the following graph compares the most recent five-year performance of the company 2019s common stock with ( 1 ) the standard & poor 2019s 500 ae index and ( 2 ) the standard & poor 2019s 500 ae materials index , a group of 25 companies categorized by standard & poor 2019s as active in the 201cmaterials 201d market sector . the graph assumes , in each case , an initial investment of $ 100 on december 31 , 2012 , and the reinvestment of dividends . historical prices prior to the separation of alcoa corporation from the company on november 1 , 2016 , have been adjusted to reflect the value of the separation transaction . the graph , table and related information shall not be deemed to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into future filings under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates it by reference into such filing . copyright a9 2018 standard & poor's , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved. .

Table: as of december 31, 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 arconic inc . $ 100 $ 124.15 $ 186.02 $ 117.48 $ 99.40 $ 147.47 s&p 500 aeindex 100 132.39 150.51 152.59 170.84 208.14 s&p 500 aematerials index 100 125.60 134.28 123.03 143.56 177.79

s&p 500 ae index 100 132.39 150.51 152.59 170.84 208.14 s&p 500 ae materials index 100 125.60 134.28 123.03 143.56 177.79 .

Question: what is the annualized return for the s&p 500 aematerials index during 2012 and 2017?
Answer: 22.25%
Calculation: subtract(exp(subtract(177.79, 100), subtract(divide(const_1, const_5), const_1)), const_1)
Explanation: it is the return of the initial investment from 2012 to 2017 turned into an annualized return by the compound interest formula .
at december 31 , 2013 , the aggregate amount of investment grade funded loans was $ 6.5 billion and the aggregate amount of non-investment grade funded loans was $ 7.9 billion . in connection with these corporate lending activities ( which include corporate funded and unfunded lending commitments ) , the company had hedges ( which include 201csingle name , 201d 201csector 201d and 201cindex 201d hedges ) with a notional amount of $ 9.0 billion related to the total corporate lending exposure of $ 93.0 billion at december 31 , 2013 . 201cevent-driven 201d loans and lending commitments at december 31 , 2013 . included in the total corporate lending exposure amounts in the table above at december 31 , 2013 were 201cevent- driven 201d exposures of $ 9.5 billion composed of funded loans of $ 2.0 billion and lending commitments of $ 7.5 billion . included in the 201cevent-driven 201d exposure at december 31 , 2013 were $ 7.3 billion of loans and lending commitments to non-investment grade borrowers . the maturity profile of the 201cevent-driven 201d loans and lending commitments at december 31 , 2013 was as follows : 33% ( 33 % ) will mature in less than 1 year , 17% ( 17 % ) will mature within 1 to 3 years , 32% ( 32 % ) will mature within 3 to 5 years and 18% ( 18 % ) will mature in over 5 years . industry exposure 2014corporate lending . the company also monitors its credit exposure to individual industries for credit exposure arising from corporate loans and lending commitments as discussed above . the following table shows the company 2019s credit exposure from its primary corporate loans and lending commitments by industry at december 31 , 2013 : industry corporate lending exposure ( dollars in millions ) .

Table: industry corporate lending exposure ( dollars in millions ) energy $ 12240 utilities 10410 healthcare 10095 consumer discretionary 9981 industrials 9514 funds exchanges and other financial services ( 1 ) 7190 consumer staples 6788 information technology 6526 telecommunications services 5658 materials 4867 real estate 4171 other 5593 total $ 93033

( 1 ) includes mutual funds , pension funds , private equity and real estate funds , exchanges and clearinghouses and diversified financial services . institutional securities other lending activities . in addition to the primary corporate lending activity described above , the institutional securities business segment engages in other lending activity . these loans primarily include corporate loans purchased in the secondary market , commercial and residential mortgage loans , asset-backed loans and financing extended to institutional clients . at december 31 , 2013 , approximately 99.6% ( 99.6 % ) of institutional securities other lending activities held for investment were current ; less than 0.4% ( 0.4 % ) were on non- accrual status because the loans were past due for a period of 90 days or more or payment of principal or interest was in doubt. .

Question: consumer related loans make up how much of the companies total corporate lending exposure?
Answer: 18%
Calculation: divide(add(9981, 6788), 93033)
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis net revenue utility following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 . amount ( in millions ) .

Table: amount ( in millions ) 2010 net revenue $ 5051 mark-to-market tax settlement sharing -196 ( 196 ) purchased power capacity -21 ( 21 ) net wholesale revenue -14 ( 14 ) volume/weather 13 ano decommissioning trust 24 retail electric price 49 other -2 ( 2 ) 2011 net revenue $ 4904

the mark-to-market tax settlement sharing variance results from a regulatory charge because a portion of the benefits of a settlement with the irs related to the mark-to-market income tax treatment of power purchase contracts will be shared with customers , slightly offset by the amortization of a portion of that charge beginning in october 2011 . see notes 3 and 8 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing . the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to price increases for ongoing purchased power capacity and additional capacity purchases . the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to lower margins on co-owner contracts and higher wholesale energy costs . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 2061 gwh in weather-adjusted usage across all sectors . weather-adjusted residential retail sales growth reflected an increase in the number of customers . industrial sales growth has continued since the beginning of 2010 . entergy 2019s service territory has benefited from the national manufacturing economy and exports , as well as industrial facility expansions . increases have been offset to some extent by declines in the paper , wood products , and pipeline segments . the increase was also partially offset by the effect of less favorable weather on residential sales . the ano decommissioning trust variance is primarily related to the deferral of investment gains from the ano 1 and 2 decommissioning trust in 2010 in accordance with regulatory treatment . the gains resulted in an increase in interest and investment income in 2010 and a corresponding increase in regulatory charges with no effect on net income . the retail electric price variance is primarily due to : rate actions at entergy texas , including a base rate increase effective august 2010 and an additional increase beginning may 2011 ; a formula rate plan increase at entergy louisiana effective may 2011 ; and a base rate increase at entergy arkansas effective july 2010 . these were partially offset by formula rate plan decreases at entergy new orleans effective october 2010 and october 2011 . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of these proceedings. .

Question: what was the percent of the change in the entergy corporation and subsidiaries net revenue in 2011
Answer: -2.9%
Calculation: divide(subtract(4904, 5051), 5051)
there were no share repurchases in 2016 . stock performance graph the graph below matches fidelity national information services , inc.'s cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index and the s&p supercap data processing & outsourced services index.aa the graph tracks the performance of a $ 100 investment in our common stock and in each index ( with the reinvestment of all dividends ) from december 31 , 2011 to december 31 , 2016. .

Table: 12/11 12/12 12/13 12/14 12/15 12/16 fidelity national information services inc . 100.00 134.12 210.97 248.68 246.21 311.81 s&p 500 100.00 116.00 153.58 174.60 177.01 198.18 s&p supercap data processing & outsourced services 100.00 126.06 194.91 218.05 247.68 267.14

the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . item 6 . selected financial ss the selected financial data set forth below constitutes historical financial data of fis and should be read in conjunction with "item 7 , management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations , " and "item 8 , financial statements and supplementary data , " included elsewhere in this report. .

Question: what was the percentage cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock fidelity national information services , inc . for the period ending 12/16?
Answer: 211.81%
Calculation: divide(subtract(311.81, const_100), const_100)
table of contents in this form 10-k , we discuss non-gaap income before income taxes , non-gaap net income , non-gaap net income per diluted share , ebitda , adjusted ebitda and adjusted ebitda margin , which are non-gaap financial measures . we believe these measures provide analysts , investors and management with helpful information regarding the underlying operating performance of our business , as they remove the impact of items that management believes are not reflective of underlying operating performance . management uses these measures to evaluate period-over-period performance as management believes they provide a more comparable measure of the underlying business . additionally , adjusted ebitda is a measure in the credit agreement governing our senior secured term loan facility ( 201cterm loan 201d ) , which is used to evaluate our ability to make certain investments , incur additional debt , and make restricted payments , such as dividends and share repurchases , as well as whether we are required to make additional principal prepayments on the term loan beyond the quarterly amortization payments . for further details regarding the term loan , see long-term debt and financing arrangements within management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations and note 10 ( long-term debt ) to the accompanying consolidated financial statements . for the definitions of non-gaap income before income taxes , non-gaap net income and adjusted ebitda and reconciliations to net income , see 201cresults of operations 201d . the results of certain key business metrics are as follows: .

Table: ( dollars in millions ) years ended december 31 , 2017 years ended december 31 , 2016 years ended december 31 , 2015 net sales $ 15191.5 $ 13981.9 $ 12988.7 gross profit 2449.9 2327.2 2115.8 income from operations 866.1 819.2 742.0 net income 523.0 424.4 403.1 non-gaap net income 605.8 569.0 503.5 adjusted ebitda 1185.6 1117.3 1018.5 average daily sales 59.8 55.0 51.1 net debt ( 1 ) 3091.3 2970.7 3222.1 cash conversion cycle ( in days ) ( 2 ) 19 19 21

net debt ( 1 ) 3091.3 2970.7 3222.1 cash conversion cycle ( in days ) ( 2 ) 19 19 21 ( 1 ) defined as total debt minus cash and cash equivalents . ( 2 ) cash conversion cycle is defined as days of sales outstanding in accounts receivable and certain receivables due from vendors plus days of supply in merchandise inventory minus days of purchases outstanding in accounts payable and accounts payable-inventory financing , based on a rolling three-month average. .

Question: what was 2016 gross margin percent?
Answer: 18%
Calculation: divide(2327.2, 12988.7)
entergy louisiana , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2004 compared to 2003 net income decreased $ 18.7 million primarily due to lower net revenue , partially offset by lower other operation and maintenance expenses . 2003 compared to 2002 net income increased slightly primarily due to higher net revenue and lower interest charges , almost entirely offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , and higher taxes other than income taxes . net revenue 2004 compared to 2003 net revenue , which is entergy louisiana's measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2004 to 2003. .

Table: ( in millions ) 2003 net revenue $ 973.7 price applied to unbilled sales -31.9 ( 31.9 ) deferred fuel cost revisions -29.4 ( 29.4 ) rate refund provisions -12.2 ( 12.2 ) volume/weather 17.0 summer capacity charges 11.8 other 2.3 2004 net revenue $ 931.3

the price applied to the unbilled sales variance is due to a decrease in the fuel price included in unbilled sales in 2004 caused primarily by the effect of nuclear plant outages in 2003 on average fuel costs . the deferred fuel cost revisions variance resulted from a revised unbilled sales pricing estimate made in the first quarter of 2003 to more closely align the fuel component of that pricing with expected recoverable fuel costs . rate refund provisions caused a decrease in net revenue due to additional provisions recorded in 2004 compared to 2003 for potential rate actions and refunds . the volume/weather variance is due to a total increase of 620 gwh in weather-adjusted usage in all sectors , partially offset by the effect of milder weather on billed sales in the residential and commercial sectors . the summer capacity charges variance is due to the amortization in 2003 of deferred capacity charges for the summer of 2001 compared to the absence of the amortization in 2004 . the amortization of these capacity charges began in august 2002 and ended in july 2003. .

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenue in 2004 for entergy louisiana?
Answer: -4.4%
Calculation: divide(subtract(931.3, 973.7), 973.7)
part ii item 5 2014market for registrant 2019s common equity and related stockholder matters ( a ) market information . the common stock of the company is currently traded on the new york stock exchange ( nyse ) under the symbol 2018 2018aes 2019 2019 . the following tables set forth the high and low sale prices for the common stock as reported by the nyse for the periods indicated . price range of common stock .

Table: 2001 first quarter high $ 60.15 low $ 41.30 2000 first quarter high $ 44.72 low $ 34.25 second quarter 52.25 39.95 second quarter 49.63 35.56 third quarter 44.50 12.00 third quarter 70.25 45.13 fourth quarter 17.80 11.60 fourth quarter 72.81 45.00

( b ) holders . as of march 2 , 2002 , there were 9967 record holders of the company 2019s common stock , par value $ 0.01 per share . ( c ) dividends . under the terms of the company 2019s corporate revolving loan and letters of credit facility of $ 850 million entered into with a commercial bank syndicate and other bank agreements , the company is currently limited in the amount of cash dividends it is allowed to pay . in addition , the company is precluded from paying cash dividends on its common stock under the terms of a guaranty to the utility customer in connection with the aes thames project in the event certain net worth and liquidity tests of the company are not met . the company has met these tests at all times since making the guaranty . the ability of the company 2019s project subsidiaries to declare and pay cash dividends to the company is subject to certain limitations in the project loans , governmental provisions and other agreements entered into by such project subsidiaries . such limitations permit the payment of cash dividends out of current cash flow for quarterly , semiannual or annual periods only at the end of such periods and only after payment of principal and interest on project loans due at the end of such periods , and in certain cases after providing for debt service reserves. .

Question: what was average of high and low stock prices for the first quarter of 2000?
Answer: 39.49
Calculation: divide(add(44.72, 34.25), const_2)