bevaya/FinQA huggingface dataset:
item 1b . unresolved staff comments not applicable . item 2 . properties as of december 26 , 2015 , our major facilities consisted of : ( square feet in millions ) united states countries total owned facilities1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30.7 17.2 47.9 leased facilities2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.1 6.0 8.1 .

Table: ( square feet in millions ) unitedstates othercountries total owned facilities1 30.7 17.2 47.9 leased facilities2 2.1 6.0 8.1 total facilities 32.8 23.2 56.0

1 leases on portions of the land used for these facilities expire on varying dates through 2062 . 2 leases expire on varying dates through 2030 and generally include renewals at our option . our principal executive offices are located in the u.s . and a majority of our wafer fabrication activities are also located in the u.s . we completed construction of development fabrication facilities in oregon during 2014 that we expect will enable us to maintain our process technology lead . we also completed construction of a large-scale fabrication building in arizona in 2013 . a portion of the new oregon and arizona facilities are currently not in use and we are reserving the new buildings for additional capacity and future technologies . incremental construction and equipment installation are required to ready the facilities for their intended use . our massachusetts fabrication facility was our last manufacturing facility on 200mm wafers and ceased production in q1 2015 . outside the u.s. , we have wafer fabrication facilities in ireland , israel , and china . our fabrication facility in ireland has transitioned to our 14nm process technology , with manufacturing continuing to ramp in 2016 . additionally , in the second half of 2016 , we will start using our facility in dalian , china to help expand our manufacturing capacity in next-generation memory . our assembly and test facilities are located in malaysia , china , and vietnam . in addition , we have sales and marketing offices worldwide that are generally located near major concentrations of customers . we believe that the facilities described above are suitable and adequate for our present purposes and that the productive capacity in our facilities is substantially being utilized or we have plans to utilize it . we do not identify or allocate assets by operating segment . for information on net property , plant and equipment by country , see 201cnote 26 : operating segments and geographic information 201d in part ii , item 8 of this form 10-k . item 3 . legal proceedings for a discussion of legal proceedings , see 201cnote 25 : contingencies 201d in part ii , item 8 of this form 10-k . item 4 . mine safety disclosures not applicable. .

Question: what percentage of total facilities as measured in square feet are leased?
Answer: 14%
Calculation: divide(8.1, 56.0)
performance graph the table below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock with the cumulative total return of ( i ) the standard & poor's 500 composite stock index ( "s&p 500 index" ) , ( ii ) the standard & poor's industrials index ( "s&p industrials index" ) and ( iii ) the standard & poor's consumer durables & apparel index ( "s&p consumer durables & apparel index" ) , from december 31 , 2012 through december 31 , 2017 , when the closing price of our common stock was $ 43.94 . the graph assumes investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2012 in our common stock and in each of the three indices and the reinvestment of dividends . the table below sets forth the value , as of december 31 for each of the years indicated , of a $ 100 investment made on december 31 , 2012 in each of our common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p industrials index and the s&p consumer durables & apparel index and includes the reinvestment of dividends. .

Table: 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 masco $ 138.48 $ 155.26 $ 200.79 $ 227.08 $ 318.46 s&p 500 index $ 132.04 $ 149.89 $ 151.94 $ 169.82 $ 206.49 s&p industrials index $ 140.18 $ 153.73 $ 149.83 $ 177.65 $ 214.55 s&p consumer durables & apparel index $ 135.84 $ 148.31 $ 147.23 $ 138.82 $ 164.39

$ 50.00 $ 100.00 $ 150.00 $ 200.00 $ 250.00 $ 300.00 $ 350.00 masco s&p 500 index s&p industrials index s&p consumer durables & apparel index .

Question: what was the difference in percentage cumulative total shareholder return on masco common stock versus the s&p 500 index for the five year period ended 2017?
Calculation: subtract(divide(subtract(318.46, const_100), const_100), divide(subtract(206.49, const_100), const_100))
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 comparison of five-year cumulative total shareholder return altria group , inc . altria peer group s&p 500 part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities . performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return of altria group , inc . 2019s common stock for the last ive years with the cumulative total return for the same period of the s&p 500 index and the altria group , inc . peer group ( 1 ) . the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 in common stock and each of the indices as of the market close on december 31 , 2011 and the reinvestment of all dividends on a quarterly basis . source : bloomberg - 201ctotal return analysis 201d calculated on a daily basis and assumes reinvestment of dividends as of the ex-dividend date . ( 1 ) in 2016 , the altria group , inc . peer group consisted of u.s.-headquartered consumer product companies that are competitors to altria group , inc . 2019s tobacco operating companies subsidiaries or that have been selected on the basis of revenue or market capitalization : campbell soup company , the coca-cola company , colgate-palmolive company , conagra brands , inc. , general mills , inc. , the hershey company , kellogg company , kimberly-clark corporation , the kraft heinz company , mondel 0113z international , inc. , pepsico , inc . and reynolds american inc . note - on october 1 , 2012 , kraft foods inc . ( kft ) spun off kraft foods group , inc . ( krft ) to its shareholders and then changed its name from kraft foods inc . to mondel 0113z international , inc . ( mdlz ) . on july 2 , 2015 , kraft foods group , inc . merged with and into a wholly owned subsidiary of h.j . heinz holding corporation , which was renamed the kraft heinz company ( khc ) . on june 12 , 2015 , reynolds american inc . ( rai ) acquired lorillard , inc . ( lo ) . on november 9 , 2016 , conagra foods , inc . ( cag ) spun off lamb weston holdings , inc . ( lw ) to its shareholders and then changed its name from conagra foods , inc . to conagra brands , inc . ( cag ) . .

Table: date altria group inc . altria group inc . peer group s&p 500 december 2011 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 december 2012 $ 111.77 $ 108.78 $ 115.99 december 2013 $ 143.69 $ 135.61 $ 153.55 december 2014 $ 193.28 $ 151.74 $ 174.55 december 2015 $ 237.92 $ 177.04 $ 176.94 december 2016 $ 286.61 $ 192.56 $ 198.09

altria altria group , inc . group , inc . peer group s&p 500 .

Question: did altria outperform the s&p 500?
Answer: yes
Calculation: greater(286.61, 198.09)
other items on our consolidated financial statements have been appropriately adjusted from the amounts provided in the earnings release , including a reduction of our full year 2016 gross profit and income from operations by $ 2.9 million , and a reduction of net income by $ 1.7 million. .

Table: ( in thousands ) at december 31 , 2016 at december 31 , 2015 at december 31 , 2014 at december 31 , 2013 at december 31 , 2012 cash and cash equivalents $ 250470 $ 129852 $ 593175 $ 347489 $ 341841 working capital ( 1 ) 1279337 1019953 1127772 702181 651370 inventories 917491 783031 536714 469006 319286 total assets 3644331 2865970 2092428 1576369 1155052 total debt including current maturities 817388 666070 281546 151551 59858 total stockholders 2019 equity $ 2030900 $ 1668222 $ 1350300 $ 1053354 $ 816922

( 1 ) working capital is defined as current assets minus current liabilities. .

Question: what is the debt-to-asset ratio?
Answer: 22.4%
Calculation: divide(817388, 3644331)
2 0 1 9 a n n u a l r e p o r t1 6 performance graph the following chart presents a comparison for the five-year period ended june 30 , 2019 , of the market performance of the company 2019s common stock with the s&p 500 index and an index of peer companies selected by the company . historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return among jack henry & associates , inc. , the s&p 500 index , and a peer group the following information depicts a line graph with the following values: .

Table: 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 jkhy 100.00 110.51 151.12 182.15 231.36 240.29 2019 peer group 100.00 126.23 142.94 166.15 224.73 281.09 2018 peer group 100.00 127.40 151.16 177.26 228.97 286.22 s&p 500 100.00 107.42 111.71 131.70 150.64 166.33

this comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on june 30 , 2014 , and assumes reinvestments of dividends . total returns are calculated according to market capitalization of peer group members at the beginning of each period . peer companies selected are in the business of providing specialized computer software , hardware and related services to financial institutions and other businesses . some peer participant companies were different for fiscal year ended 2019 compared to fiscal year ended 2018 . the company 2019s compensation committee of the board of directors adjusted the peer participants due to consolidations within the industry during the 2019 fiscal year . companies in the 2019 peer group are aci worldwide , inc. ; black knight , inc. ; bottomline technologies , inc. ; broadridge financial solutions , inc. ; cardtronics plc ; corelogic , inc. ; euronet worldwide , inc. ; exlservice holdings , inc. ; fair isaac corp. ; fidelity national information services , inc. ; fiserv , inc. ; fleetcor technologies , inc. ; global payments , inc. ; square , inc. ; ss&c technologies holdings , inc. ; total system services , inc. ; tyler technologies , inc. ; verint systems , inc. ; and wex , inc . companies in the 2018 peer group were aci worldwide , inc. ; bottomline technology , inc. ; broadridge financial solutions ; cardtronics , inc. ; corelogic , inc. ; euronet worldwide , inc. ; fair isaac corp. ; fidelity national information services , inc. ; fiserv , inc. ; global payments , inc. ; moneygram international , inc. ; ss&c technologies holdings , inc. ; total systems services , inc. ; tyler technologies , inc. ; verifone .

Question: was the five year total return of the 2019 peer group greater than the 2018 peer group?
Answer: no
Calculation: greater(281.09, 286.22)
supplementary information on oil and gas producing activities ( unaudited ) changes in the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows ( in millions ) 2011 2010 2009 .

Table: ( in millions ) 2011 2010 2009 sales and transfers of oil and gas produced net of production and administrative costs $ -7922 ( 7922 ) $ -6330 ( 6330 ) $ -4876 ( 4876 ) net changes in prices and production and administrative costs related to future production 12313 9843 4840 extensions discoveries and improved recovery less related costs 1454 1268 1399 development costs incurred during the period 1899 2546 2786 changes in estimated future development costs -1349 ( 1349 ) -2153 ( 2153 ) -3773 ( 3773 ) revisions of previous quantity estimates 2526 1117 5110 net changes in purchases and sales of minerals in place 233 -20 ( 20 ) -159 ( 159 ) accretion of discount 2040 1335 787 net change in income taxes -6676 ( 6676 ) -4231 ( 4231 ) -4345 ( 4345 ) timing and other 130 250 -149 ( 149 ) net change for the year 4648 3625 1620 beginning of the year 9280 5655 4035 end of year $ 13928 $ 9280 $ 5655

.

Question: what was the average net annual change in discounted future net cash flows ( in millions ) for the years 2011 , 2010 , and 2009?
Answer: 3298
Calculation: table_average(net change for the year, none)
entergy mississippi , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2017 compared to 2016 net income increased $ 0.8 million primarily due to higher other income , lower other operation and maintenance expenses , and lower interest expense , substantially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses and a higher effective income tax rate . 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 16.5 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , higher net revenues , and a lower effective income tax rate , partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses . net revenue 2017 compared to 2016 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 . amount ( in millions ) .

Table: amount ( in millions ) 2016 net revenue $ 705.4 volume/weather -18.2 ( 18.2 ) retail electric price 13.5 other 2.4 2017 net revenue $ 703.1

the volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of less favorable weather on residential and commercial sales . the retail electric price variance is primarily due to a $ 19.4 million net annual increase in rates , effective with the first billing cycle of july 2016 , and an increase in the energy efficiency rider , effective with the first billing cycle of february 2017 , each as approved by the mpsc . the increase was partially offset by decreased storm damage rider revenues due to resetting the storm damage provision to zero beginning with the november 2016 billing cycle . entergy mississippi resumed billing the storm damage rider effective with the september 2017 billing cycle . see note 2 to the financial statements for more discussion of the formula rate plan and the storm damage rider. .

Question: what was the average net revenue between 2016 and 2017 in millions
Answer: 704.25
Calculation: divide(add(add(703.1, 705.4), const_2), const_2)
there were no share repurchases in 2016 . stock performance graph the graph below matches fidelity national information services , inc.'s cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index and the s&p supercap data processing & outsourced services index.aa the graph tracks the performance of a $ 100 investment in our common stock and in each index ( with the reinvestment of all dividends ) from december 31 , 2011 to december 31 , 2016. .

Table: 12/11 12/12 12/13 12/14 12/15 12/16 fidelity national information services inc . 100.00 134.12 210.97 248.68 246.21 311.81 s&p 500 100.00 116.00 153.58 174.60 177.01 198.18 s&p supercap data processing & outsourced services 100.00 126.06 194.91 218.05 247.68 267.14

the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . item 6 . selected financial ss the selected financial data set forth below constitutes historical financial data of fis and should be read in conjunction with "item 7 , management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations , " and "item 8 , financial statements and supplementary data , " included elsewhere in this report. .

Question: what was the difference in percentage cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock fidelity national information services , inc . compared to the s&p 500 for the period ending 12/16?
Answer: 113.63%
Calculation: subtract(divide(subtract(311.81, const_100), const_100), divide(subtract(198.18, const_100), const_100))
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our common stock on the nyse for the years 2016 and 2015. .

Table: 2016 high low quarter ended march 31 $ 102.93 $ 83.07 quarter ended june 30 113.63 101.87 quarter ended september 30 118.26 107.57 quarter ended december 31 118.09 99.72 2015 high low quarter ended march 31 $ 101.88 $ 93.21 quarter ended june 30 98.64 91.99 quarter ended september 30 101.54 86.83 quarter ended december 31 104.12 87.23

on february 17 , 2017 , the closing price of our common stock was $ 108.11 per share as reported on the nyse . as of february 17 , 2017 , we had 427195037 outstanding shares of common stock and 153 registered holders . dividends as a reit , we must annually distribute to our stockholders an amount equal to at least 90% ( 90 % ) of our reit taxable income ( determined before the deduction for distributed earnings and excluding any net capital gain ) . generally , we have distributed and expect to continue to distribute all or substantially all of our reit taxable income after taking into consideration our utilization of net operating losses ( 201cnols 201d ) . we have two series of preferred stock outstanding , 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) mandatory convertible preferred stock , series a ( the 201cseries a preferred stock 201d ) , issued in may 2014 , with a dividend rate of 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) , and the 5.50% ( 5.50 % ) mandatory convertible preferred stock , series b ( the 201cseries b preferred stock 201d ) , issued in march 2015 , with a dividend rate of 5.50% ( 5.50 % ) . dividends are payable quarterly in arrears , subject to declaration by our board of directors . the amount , timing and frequency of future distributions will be at the sole discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon various factors , a number of which may be beyond our control , including our financial condition and operating cash flows , the amount required to maintain our qualification for taxation as a reit and reduce any income and excise taxes that we otherwise would be required to pay , limitations on distributions in our existing and future debt and preferred equity instruments , our ability to utilize nols to offset our distribution requirements , limitations on our ability to fund distributions using cash generated through our trss and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant . we have distributed an aggregate of approximately $ 3.2 billion to our common stockholders , including the dividend paid in january 2017 , primarily subject to taxation as ordinary income. .

Question: for the quarter ended march 312015 what was the percentage change in the share price from the highest to the lowest
Answer: 9.3%
Calculation: divide(subtract(101.88, 93.21), 93.21)
notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 7 2014income taxes ( continued ) as of september 30 , 2006 , the company has state and foreign tax loss and state credit carryforwards , the tax effect of which is $ 55 million . certain of those carryforwards , the tax effect of which is $ 12 million , expire between 2016 and 2019 . a portion of these carryforwards was acquired from the company 2019s previous acquisitions , the utilization of which is subject to certain limitations imposed by the internal revenue code . the remaining benefits from tax losses and credits do not expire . as of september 30 , 2006 and september 24 , 2005 , a valuation allowance of $ 5 million was recorded against the deferred tax asset for the benefits of state operating losses that may not be realized . management believes it is more likely than not that forecasted income , including income that may be generated as a result of certain tax planning strategies , together with the tax effects of the deferred tax liabilities , will be sufficient to fully recover the remaining deferred tax assets . a reconciliation of the provision for income taxes , with the amount computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate ( 35% ( 35 % ) in 2006 , 2005 , and 2004 ) to income before provision for income taxes , is as follows ( in millions ) : 2006 2005 2004 as restated ( 1 ) as restated ( 1 ) .

Table: 2006 2005 as restated ( 1 ) 2004 as restated ( 1 ) computed expected tax $ 987 $ 633 $ 129 state taxes net of federal effect 86 -19 ( 19 ) -5 ( 5 ) indefinitely invested earnings of foreign subsidiaries -224 ( 224 ) -98 ( 98 ) -31 ( 31 ) nondeductible executive compensation 11 14 12 research and development credit net -12 ( 12 ) -26 ( 26 ) -5 ( 5 ) other items -19 ( 19 ) -24 ( 24 ) 4 provision for income taxes $ 829 $ 480 $ 104 effective tax rate 29% ( 29 % ) 27% ( 27 % ) 28% ( 28 % )

( 1 ) see note 2 , 201crestatement of consolidated financial statements . 201d the company 2019s income taxes payable has been reduced by the tax benefits from employee stock options . the company receives an income tax benefit calculated as the difference between the fair market value of the stock issued at the time of the exercise and the option price , tax effected . the net tax benefits from employee stock option transactions were $ 419 million , $ 428 million ( as restated ( 1 ) ) , and $ 83 million ( as restated ( 1 ) ) in 2006 , 2005 , and 2004 , respectively , and were reflected as an increase to common stock in the consolidated statements of shareholders 2019 equity. .

Question: what was the greatest provision for income taxes , in millions?
Answer: 829
Calculation: table_max(provision for income taxes, none)