bevaya/FinQA huggingface dataset:
stock performance graph the graph depicted below shows a comparison of our cumulative total stockholder returns for our common stock , the nasdaq stock market index , and the nasdaq pharmaceutical index , from the date of our initial public offering on july 27 , 2000 through december 26 , 2003 . the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested on july 27 , 2000 , in our common stock and in each index , and that all dividends were reinvested . no cash dividends have been declared on our common stock . stockholder returns over the indicated period should not be considered indicative of future stockholder returns . comparison of total return among illumina , inc. , the nasdaq composite index and the nasdaq pharmaceutical index december 26 , 2003december 27 , 2002december 28 , 2001december 29 , 2000july 27 , 2000 illumina , inc . nasdaq composite index nasdaq pharmaceutical index july 27 , december 29 , december 28 , december 27 , december 26 , 2000 2000 2001 2002 2003 .

Table: july 27 2000 december 29 2000 december 28 2001 december 27 2002 december 26 2003 illumina inc . 100.00 100.39 71.44 19.50 43.81 nasdaq composite index 100.00 63.84 51.60 35.34 51.73 nasdaq pharmaceutical index 100.00 93.20 82.08 51.96 74.57

.

Question: what was the difference in cumulative total stockholder return percentage for illumina inc . common stock versus the nasdaq pharmaceutical index for the four years end 2003?
Answer: -30.76%
Calculation: subtract(subtract(43.81, const_100), subtract(74.57, const_100))
management 2019s discussion and analysis 150 jpmorgan chase & co./2012 annual report wholesale credit portfolio as of december 31 , 2012 , wholesale exposure ( cib , cb and am ) increased by $ 70.9 billion from december 31 , 2011 , primarily driven by increases of $ 52.1 billion in lending- related commitments and $ 30.2 billion in loans due to increased client activity across most regions and most businesses . the increase in loans was due to growth in cb and am . these increases were partially offset by a $ 17.5 billion decrease in derivative receivables , primarily related to the decline in the u.s . dollar , and tightening of credit spreads ; these changes resulted in reductions to interest rate , credit derivative , and foreign exchange balances . wholesale credit portfolio december 31 , credit exposure nonperforming ( c ) ( d ) .

Table: december 31 , ( in millions ) december 31 , 2012 december 31 , 2011 2012 2011 loans retained $ 306222 $ 278395 $ 1434 $ 2398 loans held-for-sale 4406 2524 18 110 loans at fair value 2555 2097 93 73 loans 2013 reported 313183 283016 1545 2581 derivative receivables 74983 92477 239 297 receivables from customers and other ( a ) 23648 17461 2014 2014 total wholesale credit-related assets 411814 392954 1784 2878 lending-related commitments 434814 382739 355 865 total wholesale credit exposure $ 846628 $ 775693 $ 2139 $ 3743 credit portfolio management derivatives notional net ( b ) $ -27447 ( 27447 ) $ -26240 ( 26240 ) $ -25 ( 25 ) $ -38 ( 38 ) liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivatives -13658 ( 13658 ) -21807 ( 21807 ) na na

receivables from customers and other ( a ) 23648 17461 2014 2014 total wholesale credit- related assets 411814 392954 1784 2878 lending-related commitments 434814 382739 355 865 total wholesale credit exposure $ 846628 $ 775693 $ 2139 $ 3743 credit portfolio management derivatives notional , net ( b ) $ ( 27447 ) $ ( 26240 ) $ ( 25 ) $ ( 38 ) liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivatives ( 13658 ) ( 21807 ) na na ( a ) receivables from customers and other primarily includes margin loans to prime and retail brokerage customers ; these are classified in accrued interest and accounts receivable on the consolidated balance sheets . ( b ) represents the net notional amount of protection purchased and sold through credit derivatives used to manage both performing and nonperforming wholesale credit exposures ; these derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting under u.s . gaap . excludes the synthetic credit portfolio . for additional information , see credit derivatives on pages 158 2013159 , and note 6 on pages 218 2013227 of this annual report . ( c ) excludes assets acquired in loan satisfactions . ( d ) prior to the first quarter of 2012 , reported amounts had only included defaulted derivatives ; effective in the first quarter of 2012 , reported amounts in all periods include both defaulted derivatives as well as derivatives that have been risk rated as nonperforming. .

Question: what was the percentage change in lending-related commitments from 2011 to 2012?
Answer: 14%
Calculation: divide(subtract(434814, 382739), 382739)
the graph below shows a five-year comparison of the cumulative shareholder return on the company's common stock with the cumulative total return of the s&p small cap 600 index and the russell 1000 index , both of which are published indices . comparison of five-year cumulative total return from december 31 , 2005 to december 31 , 2010 assumes $ 100 invested with reinvestment of dividends period indexed returns .

Table: company/index baseperiod 12/31/05 baseperiod 12/31/06 baseperiod 12/31/07 baseperiod 12/31/08 baseperiod 12/31/09 12/31/10 a o smith corp 100.0 108.7 103.3 88.8 133.6 178.8 s&p small cap 600 index 100.0 115.1 114.8 78.1 98.0 123.8 russell 1000 index 100.0 115.5 122.1 76.2 97.9 113.6

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 smith ( a o ) corp s&p smallcap 600 index russell 1000 index .

Question: what was the difference in the cumulative total return for a o smith corp and the russell 1000 index for the five year period ended 12/31/10?
Answer: 65.2%
Calculation: subtract(divide(subtract(178.8, const_100), const_100), divide(subtract(113.6, const_100), const_100))
2007 annual report 21 five-year stock performance graph the graph below illustrates the cumulative total shareholder return on snap-on common stock since 2002 , assuming that dividends were reinvested . the graph compares snap-on 2019s performance to that of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and a peer group . snap-on incorporated total shareholder return ( 1 ) 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 snap-on incorporated peer group s&p 500 fiscal year ended ( 2 ) snap-on incorporated peer group ( 3 ) s&p 500 .

Table: fiscal year ended ( 2 ) snap-on incorporated peer group ( 3 ) s&p 500 december 31 2002 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 december 31 2003 118.80 126.16 128.68 december 31 2004 130.66 152.42 142.69 december 31 2005 146.97 157.97 149.70 december 31 2006 191.27 185.10 173.34 december 31 2007 198.05 216.19 182.87

( 1 ) assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2002 and that dividends were reinvested quarterly . ( 2 ) the company's fiscal year ends on the saturday closest to december 31 of each year ; the fiscal year end is assumed to be december 31 for ease of calculation . ( 3 ) the peer group includes : the black & decker corporation , cooper industries , ltd. , danaher corporation , emerson electric co. , fortune brands , inc. , genuine parts company , newell rubbermaid inc. , pentair , inc. , spx corporation , the stanley works and w.w . grainger , inc. .

Question: what is the roi in s&p500 if the investment was made at the end of 2005 and sold at the end of 2007?
Answer: 22.2%
Calculation: divide(subtract(182.87, 149.70), 149.70)
issuer purchases of equity securities during the three months ended december 31 , 2012 , we repurchased 619314 shares of our common stock for an aggregate of approximately $ 46.0 million , including commissions and fees , pursuant to our publicly announced stock repurchase program , as follows : period total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) average price paid per share ( 2 ) total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs ( in millions ) .

Table: period total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) average price paid per share ( 2 ) total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans orprograms approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans orprograms ( in millions ) october 2012 27524 $ 72.62 27524 $ 1300.1 november 2012 489390 $ 74.22 489390 $ 1263.7 december 2012 102400 $ 74.83 102400 $ 1256.1 total fourth quarter 619314 $ 74.25 619314 $ 1256.1

( 1 ) repurchases made pursuant to the $ 1.5 billion stock repurchase program approved by our board of directors in march 2011 ( the 201c2011 buyback 201d ) . under this program , our management is authorized to purchase shares from time to time through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions at prevailing prices as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements , and subject to market conditions and other factors . to facilitate repurchases , we make purchases pursuant to trading plans under rule 10b5-1 of the exchange act , which allows us to repurchase shares during periods when we otherwise might be prevented from doing so under insider trading laws or because of self-imposed trading blackout periods . this program may be discontinued at any time . ( 2 ) average price per share is calculated using the aggregate price , excluding commissions and fees . we continued to repurchase shares of our common stock pursuant to our 2011 buyback subsequent to december 31 , 2012 . between january 1 , 2013 and january 21 , 2013 , we repurchased an additional 15790 shares of our common stock for an aggregate of $ 1.2 million , including commissions and fees , pursuant to the 2011 buyback . as a result , as of january 21 , 2013 , we had repurchased a total of approximately 4.3 million shares of our common stock under the 2011 buyback for an aggregate of $ 245.2 million , including commissions and fees . we expect to continue to manage the pacing of the remaining $ 1.3 billion under the 2011 buyback in response to general market conditions and other relevant factors. .

Question: was was the total amount spent on stock repurchases in december 2012?
Answer: 7662592
Calculation: multiply(102400, 74.83)
supplemental financial information common stock performance the following graph compares the performance of an investment in the firm 2019s common stock from december 26 , 2008 ( the last trading day before the firm 2019s 2009 fiscal year ) through december 31 , 2013 , with the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 financials index . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested on december 26 , 2008 in each of the firm 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 financials index , and the dividends were reinvested on the date of payment without payment of any commissions . the performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance . the goldman sachs group , inc . s&p 500 index s&p 500 financials index dec-09 dec-10 dec-11 dec-12 dec-13dec-08 the table below shows the cumulative total returns in dollars of the firm 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 financials index for goldman sachs 2019 last five fiscal year ends , assuming $ 100 was invested on december 26 , 2008 in each of the firm 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 financials index , and the dividends were reinvested on the date of payment without payment of any commissions . the performance shown in the table represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance. .

Table: 12/26/08 12/31/09 12/31/10 12/31/11 12/31/12 12/31/13 the goldman sachs group inc . $ 100.00 $ 224.98 $ 226.19 $ 123.05 $ 176.42 $ 248.36 s&p 500 index 100.00 130.93 150.65 153.83 178.42 236.20 s&p 500 financials index 100.00 124.38 139.47 115.67 148.92 201.92

218 goldman sachs 2013 annual report .

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total return for goldman sachs group inc . for the five year period ending 12/31/13?
Answer: 148.36%
Calculation: divide(subtract(248.36, const_100), const_100)
five-year performance comparison 2013 the following graph provides an indicator of cumulative total shareholder returns for the corporation as compared to the peer group index ( described above ) , the dow jones , and the s&p 500 . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in the common stock of union pacific corporation and each index was $ 100 on december 31 , 2005 and that all dividends were reinvested . purchases of equity securities 2013 during 2010 , we repurchased 17556522 shares of our common stock at an average price of $ 75.51 . the following table presents common stock repurchases during each month for the fourth quarter of 2010 : period total number of shares purchased [a] average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announced plan or program [b] maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plan or program [b] .

Table: period total number ofsharespurchased [a] averageprice paidper share total number of sharespurchased as part of apublicly announced planor program [b] maximum number ofshares that may yetbe purchased under the planor program [b] oct . 1 through oct . 31 725450 84.65 519554 17917736 nov . 1 through nov . 30 1205260 89.92 1106042 16811694 dec . 1 through dec . 31 1133106 92.59 875000 15936694 total 3063816 $ 89.66 2500596 n/a

[a] total number of shares purchased during the quarter includes approximately 563220 shares delivered or attested to upc by employees to pay stock option exercise prices , satisfy excess tax withholding obligations for stock option exercises or vesting of retention units , and pay withholding obligations for vesting of retention shares . [b] on may 1 , 2008 , our board of directors authorized us to repurchase up to 40 million shares of our common stock through march 31 , 2011 . we may make these repurchases on the open market or through other transactions . our management has sole discretion with respect to determining the timing and amount of these transactions . on february 3 , 2011 , our board of directors authorized us to repurchase up to 40 million additional shares of our common stock under a new program effective from april 1 , 2011 through march 31 , 2014. .

Question: for the quarter ended december 312010 what was percent of the total number of shares attested to upc by employees to pay stock option exercise prices
Answer: 18.4%
Calculation: divide(563220, 3063816)
table of contents part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities . price range our common stock trades on the nasdaq global select market under the symbol 201cmktx 201d . the range of closing price information for our common stock , as reported by nasdaq , was as follows : on february 20 , 2013 , the last reported closing price of our common stock on the nasdaq global select market was $ 39.60 . holders there were 33 holders of record of our common stock as of february 20 , 2013 . dividend policy we initiated a regular quarterly dividend in the fourth quarter of 2009 . during 2012 and 2011 , we paid quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.11 per share and $ 0.09 per share , respectively . on december 27 , 2012 , we paid a special dividend of $ 1.30 per share . in january 2013 , our board of directors approved a quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.13 per share payable on february 28 , 2013 to stockholders of record as of the close of business on february 14 , 2013 . any future declaration and payment of dividends will be at the sole discretion of our board of directors . the board of directors may take into account such matters as general business conditions , our financial results , capital requirements , and contractual , legal , and regulatory restrictions on the payment of dividends to our stockholders or by our subsidiaries to the parent and any other such factors as the board of directors may deem relevant . recent sales of unregistered securities securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans please see the section entitled 201cequity compensation plan information 201d in item 12. .

Table: 2012: high low january 1 2012 to march 31 2012 $ 37.79 $ 29.26 april 1 2012 to june 30 2012 $ 37.65 $ 26.22 july 1 2012 to september 30 2012 $ 34.00 $ 26.88 october 1 2012 to december 31 2012 $ 35.30 $ 29.00 2011: high low january 1 2011 to march 31 2011 $ 24.19 $ 19.78 april 1 2011 to june 30 2011 $ 25.22 $ 21.00 july 1 2011 to september 30 2011 $ 30.75 $ 23.41 october 1 2011 to december 31 2011 $ 31.16 $ 24.57

.

Question: for the period of october 1 2011 to december 31 2011 , what was the difference between high and low share price?
Answer: 6.59
Calculation: subtract(31.16, 24.57)
measurement point december 31 the priceline group nasdaq composite index s&p 500 rdg internet composite .

Table: measurement pointdecember 31 the priceline group inc . nasdaqcomposite index s&p 500index rdg internetcomposite 2011 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 2012 132.64 116.41 116.00 119.34 2013 248.53 165.47 153.58 195.83 2014 243.79 188.69 174.60 192.42 2015 272.59 200.32 177.01 264.96 2016 313.45 216.54 198.18 277.56

.

Question: what was the percent of the growth in measurement of the the priceline group inc . from 2014 to 2015
Answer: 11.8%
Calculation: divide(subtract(272.59, 243.79), 243.79)
Explanation: the percent of the growth in measurement of the the priceline group inc . from 2014 to 2015 was 11.8%
dish network corporation notes to consolidated financial statements - continued future minimum lease payments under the capital lease obligation , together with the present value of the net minimum lease payments as of december 31 , 2010 are as follows ( in thousands ) : for the years ended december 31 .

Table: 2011 $ 82184 2012 77110 2013 75970 2014 75970 2015 75970 thereafter 390239 total minimum lease payments 777443 less : amount representing lease of the orbital location and estimated executory costs ( primarily insurance and maintenance ) including profit thereon included in total minimum lease payments -357982 ( 357982 ) net minimum lease payments 419461 less : amount representing interest -132490 ( 132490 ) present value of net minimum lease payments 286971 less : current portion -24801 ( 24801 ) long-term portion of capital lease obligations $ 262170

the summary of future maturities of our outstanding long-term debt as of december 31 , 2010 is included in the commitments table in note 14 . 10 . income taxes and accounting for uncertainty in income taxes income taxes our income tax policy is to record the estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and amounts reported on our consolidated balance sheets , as well as probable operating loss , tax credit and other carryforwards . deferred tax assets are offset by valuation allowances when we believe it is more likely than not that net deferred tax assets will not be realized . we periodically evaluate our need for a valuation allowance . determining necessary valuation allowances requires us to make assessments about historical financial information as well as the timing of future events , including the probability of expected future taxable income and available tax planning opportunities . as of december 31 , 2010 , we had no net operating loss carryforwards ( 201cnols 201d ) for federal income tax purposes and $ 13 million of nol benefit for state income tax purposes . the state nols begin to expire in the year 2020 . in addition , there are $ 11 million of tax benefits related to credit carryforwards which are partially offset by a valuation allowance and $ 42 million of capital loss carryforwards which were fully offset by a valuation allowance . the credit carryforwards begin to expire in the year 2011. .

Question: what percentage of total minimum lease payments are due after 2015?
Answer: 50%
Calculation: divide(390239, 777443)
compensation plan approved by security holders . the employee stock purchase plan and the 2005 director stock plan were approved by shareholders at our 2005 annual meeting of shareholders . in connection with our mergers with cbot holdings and nymex holdings , we assumed their existing equity plans . the shares relating to the cbot holdings and nymex holdings plans are listed in the table below as being made under an equity compensation plan approved by security holders based upon the fact that shareholders of the company approved the related merger transactions . plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options ( a ) weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options ( b ) number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1211143 $ 308.10 5156223 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5978 22.00 2014 .

Table: plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options ( a ) weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options ( b ) number of securities remaining available for future issuance underequity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders 1211143 $ 308.10 5156223 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders 5978 22.00 2014 total 1217121 5156223

item 13 . certain relationships , related transactions and director independence the information required by this item is included in cme group 2019s proxy statement under the heading 201ccertain business relationships with related parties 201d and 201ccorporate governance 2014director independence 201d and is incorporated herein by reference , pursuant to general instruction g ( 3 ) . item 14 . principal accountant fees and services the information required by this item is included in cme group 2019s proxy statement under the heading 201caudit committee disclosures 2014principal accountant fees and services 201d and 201caudit committee disclosures 2014audit committee policy for approval of audit and permitted non-audit services 201d and is incorporated herein by reference , pursuant to general instruction g ( 3 ) . .

Question: what was the percent of the total number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options that was securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options
Answer: 99.5%
Calculation: divide(1211143, 1217121)