FOURTEENTH CONGRESS OF 
THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES ) 
~~~~~~~~~) 
:w. 
First Regular Session 
1 
S E N A T E  
Introduced by Senator Aquilino Q. Pimentel Jr. 
EXPLANATORY NOTE 
Twenty one years after the ouster of former President Ferdinand E. Marcos, the human 
rights violations committed by his dictatorship - like the plunder perpetrated by his 
family and cronies - still elude justice. To the thousands of Filipinos whose civil and 
political rights were violated by the Marcos regime, this injustice is still a painful wound 
unhealed by the passage of time. 
From June 30, 1965, when Marcos became President, to September 21, 1972, when he 
declared Martial Law and until February 25, 1986, when the Filipino people finally 
ousted his regime in the first peaceful People Power revolution in OUT history, thousands 
of Filipino men and women struggled against the dictatorship of Ferdinand Marcos. They 
came from all sectors of Philippine society - militant workers and peasants, student 
activist, 
indigenous 
communities, patriotic businessmen, conscientious public 
servants, religious workers, Filipinos forced into exile, journalist, teachers, lawyers, 
doctors and other professionals, rebels from underground and from among the Mor0 and 
Cordillera people. 
The violations of human rights committed by the Marcos regime were as varied as its 
victims. Those with businesses or property coveted by the regime were forced to give up 
their assets. The greed of the dictator was matched only by the brutality of his 
dictatorship. Those who opposed his rule were arrested, and detained under the regime’s 
travesty of a legal system. Many were subjected to torture and to unspeakable acts of 
cruelty. Others became victims of forced disappearances and remain missing this day. 
Many more were summarily executed, ‘salvaged’ in secret or killed in ruthless public 
massacres. Others were forced into exile abroad. One of them came back believing the 
Filipino people were worth dying for. What eventually became a People Power 
revolution would not have been possible without the struggle waged by the thousands of 
Filipinos who fell or suffered in the darkest days of the dictatorship. 
Those who survived as well as the families’ left behind by those who died still bear the 
scars of that struggle. Twenty one years after the ouster of the Marcos dictatorship, the 
victims of its human rights violations have not received any reparation for the pain they 
went through or for the loss they suffered. This bill proposes to correct that injustice. 
First, it acknowledges that compensation for victims of human rights violations is an 
obligation of the State. After all, it is the state that guarantees the civil and political rights 
of its citizens. 
Second, the bill formally recognizes both the various forms of human rights violations 
committed during the Marcos dictatorship and those who were its victims. It gives prima 
facie recognition as human rights victims the more than 9,000 class suit plaintiffs who, 


ironically, found justice against the Marcos dictatorship in a foreign court. It establishes 
the criteria for compensating victims of human rights violations. 
Third, it provides the statutory basis and guidelines for awarding compensation. It 
harmonizes the constitutional mandate to recover ill-gotten wealth from the Marcoses and 
their cronies with the means by which part of the funds so recovered may be used to 
compensate human rights victims. 
Fourth, the bill sets aside a portion of the Swiss bank deposits held in escrow, subject of 
Civil Case 141 decided by the Sandigunbayan for the recovery of the ill-gotten wealth of 
the Marcoses as the source for the compensation, even as it already appropriates a fund 
separate from the deposits in escrow. 
Fifth, the bill directs the Commission on Human Rights (CHR) and the Presidential 
Commission on Good Government (PCGG) to implement the law. 
Finally, it recognizes the need to officially document the history o f  human rights 
violations under the Marcos regime. It directs the CHR, the PCGG, the National 
Historical Institute ("I) 
and the University of the Philippines (UP) to submit a report to 
the President, to Congress and to the Supreme Court. Ultimately, it recognizes the need to 
tell the truth about that part of Filipino history so it may hopefully, never happen again. 
The passage of this bill had been certified as urgent by the President in the Twelfth 
Congress so as to meet the urgency of granting the long-delayed compensation for the 
human rights victims and to comply with the Republic's bilateral as well as multilateral 
legal obligations arising from human rights law and litigation. 
$.--- f
d
 
A ULINB Q. PIMENTEL, JR. 


FOURTEENTH CONGRESS OF THE) 
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES 
) 
First Regular Session 
) 
Senate Bill No. 
lnfroduced by Senator Aquilino Q. Pimentel, Jr. 
AN ACT 
PROVIDING COMPENSATION TO VICTIMS OF HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS DURING THE MARCOS 
REGIME, DOCUMENTATION OF SAID VIOLATIONS, APPROPRIATING FUNDS THEREFOR, AND 
FOR OTHER PURPOSES 
Be if enacted by the Senate and the House of Representafives of fhe Philippines in Congress assembled: 
SECTION 1. Short Title. - This Act shall also be known as the “Compensation Act to Victims of 
Human Rights Violations”. 
SEC. 2. Declarafion of Po/icy, - Section 11 of Article I1 of the Constitution of the Republic of the 
Philippines declares that the State values the dignity of every human person and guarantees full respect for 
human rights. Pursuant to this declared policy, Section 12 of Article 111 of the Constitution prohibits the use 
of torture, force, violence, threat, intimidation, or any other means which vitiate the free will and mandates 
the compensation and rehabilitation of victims of torture or similar practices, and their families. Section 
18(6) of Article Xlll of the Constitution also directs the Commission on Human Rights (CHR) to recommend 
to the Congress effective measures to promote human rights and to provide for compensation to victims of 
human rights violations, or their families. By virtue of Section 2 of Article I1 of the Constitution adopting 
generally accepted principles of international law as part of the law of the land, the Philippines must also 
adhere to international human rights laws and conventions, including the International Covenant on Civil 
and Political Rights (ICCPR) which imposes on each State party the obligation to take the necessary steps 
to adopt such laws to give effect to the rights recognized therein and to ensure that any person whose 
rights or freedoms have been violated shall have an effective remedy even if the violation is committed by 
persons acting in an official capacity. 
Consistent with the foregoing, it is hereby declared the policy of the State to recognize the heroism 
and sacrifices of all Filipinos who were victims of summary execution, torture, involuntary disappearance 


- 2 -  
and other gross human rights violations committed during the dictatorial regime of former President 
Ferdinand Marcos covering the period from September 21, 1972 to February 25, 1986 and restore the 
victim's honor and dignity. The State hereby acknowledges its moral and legal obligation to recognize 
and/or compensate said victims andlor their families for the deaths, injuries, sufferings, deprivations, and 
damages they suffered under the Marcos regime. 
SEC. 3. Definition of Terms. - The following terms as used in this Act shall mean: 
a. "Human Rights Violation", - A human rights violation shall include, but not be limited to, any of 
the following acts or omissions during the period from September 21, 1972 to February 25, 1986 committed 
by persons acting in an official capacity andlor agents of the State: 
1. 
Any search, arrest andlor detention without a valid search warrant or warrant of arrest 
issued by a civilian court of law, including any warrantless arrest or detention carried out 
pursuant to the declaration of Martial Law by Former President Ferdinand Marcos as well as 
any arrest or detention or deprivation of liberty carried out during the aforementioned 
covered period on the basis of an "Arrest Seize and Seizure Order (ASSO)", a "Presidential 
Commitment Order (PCO)" or a "Preventive Detention Action (PDA)" as they were defined 
by decrees of Former President Ferdinand Marcos or in any manner that the arrest, 
detention or deprivation of liberty was effected; 
Any commission by a person acting in an official capacity andlor an agent of the State of 
physical injury, torture, killing, harassment, deprivation of liberty or other similar acts on any 
person exercising civil or political rights, including the freedom of speech, assembly or 
organization; andlor the right to petition the government for redress of grievances even if 
such exercise was alleged to constitute or form part of rebellion, sedition or subversion as 
then defined by law; and even if such violation took place during or in the course of what the 
authorities at the time deemed an illegal assembly or demonstration: Provided, That torture 
in any form or under any circumstances shall be considered a human rights violation; 
Any involuntary or enforced disappearance caused upon a person who was arrested, 
detained or abducted against hisiher wil or otherwise deprived of hidher liberty; 
Any force or intimidation causing the involuntarily exile of a person from the Philippines; 
2. 
3. 
4. 


- 3 -  
5. 
Any unjust or illegal takeover of a business or the confiscation of the property of a person, 
including those caused by Former President Ferdinand Marcos, his spouse Imelda Marcos, 
their immediate relatives by consanguinity or affinity, as well as those persons considered 
as among their close relatives, associates, cronies and subordinates under Executive Order 
No, 1, issued on February 26, 1986 by President Corazon Aquino in the exercise of her 
legislative powers under the Freedom Constitution; 
Any acts constituting the following: 
(a) 
saturation drives andlor "zona"s; 
(b) 
"hamletting" and/or food blockades; 
(c) 
6. 
kidnapping or otherwise exploiting children of persons suspected of committing acts 
against the Marcos regime; 
committing sexual offenses against detainees and/or in the course of conducting 
military andlor police operations; 
violation of the freedom of the press by the imposition of censorship, closure of media 
facilities, and/or detention of editors and media practitioners; 
violation of the freedom of speech and assembly by preventing assemblies and 
demonstrations andlor violently dispersing them; 
violation of the rights of labor by preventing and dispersing 
strikes and other 
concerted activities; and 
other violations and/or abuses similar or analogous to the above, including those 
recognized by international law. 
(d) 
(e) 
(f) 
(9) 
(h) 
b. "Human Rights Violation Victim" (HRVV). - For purposes of this Act, a victim of a human 
rights violation is one whose human rights were violated by persons acting in an official capacity and/or 
agents of the State as these terms are defined herein. In order to qualify for compensation under this Act, 
the human rights violation must have occurred during the period from September 21, 1972 to February 25, 
1986: Provided, however, That victims of human rights violations that occurred within one month after 
February 25, 1986 shall be entitled to compensation under this Act if they can establish that: 


- 4 .  
(i) the violation was committed by agents of the State andlor persons acting in an official capacity 
loyal to the Marcos regime; 
(ii) the violation was committed for the purpose of preserving, maintaining, supporting or 
promoting the said regime; or 
(iii) the violation was committed to conceal abuses during the blarcos regime andlor the effects of 
martial law. 
c. "Persons Acting in an Official CapacitylAgents of the State". 1 The following shall be deemed 
persons acting in an official capacity andlor agents of the State: 
1. Any member of the former Philippine Constabulary (PC), the forme: Integrated National Police 
(Ib!P), the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) and ti;.: 
Civilian Homu kfeiise Forx 
(CHDF) from Septembei 21, 1972 !o FcJbruary 25, ,1986 as well as ar!y cidizn a@i!k 
a!tached thereto; and any member of a paramilitary group even if he is imt orsanically part of 
the PC, INP, AFP or CHDF so lcng as it is shown that the group was oqanized, funded, 
supplied kith equipment, facilities and/or resources, andlor indoctrinated, controlled andlor 
supervised by any person acting in an official capacitylagent of the State as herein defined; 
2. Any member of the civil service, including persons who held elective or appointivg public office 
at any time from September 21,1972 to February 25,1986; and 
3. Persons referred to in Executive Ordc,? No. I, 
inc!uding Former President Ferdinand Marccs, 
his spouse Imelda Marcos, their immediate relatives by consahguinity or affinity, as well as 
their dose relatives, associates, cronies and subordinates. 
(d) "Monetary Compensation". - refers to any financial consideration equiva!ent to an 
economically assessable damage under this Act resul!ing from !he violation of the victim's liuman rights. 
(e) Won-Monetary Cornpensation". - refers to a ncn-pecuniary compensaticn to a victim cf a 
Cman rights violzdion or mr?rnbers of his family to restore his or his fsmily's honor and dignity end shall 
i::clude, but not be limited to, psychotherapy, counseling, medical care, sxial ame!ioration and honorific 
recognition. 


- 5 -  
(9 "Torture" refers to any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or 
psychological, is intentionally inflicted on a person under the custody of agents of the State, as defined by 
law, jurisprudence and international conventions. 
SEC. 4. Prima Facie Presumption that a person is a victim of a Human Rights Violation. . The 
persons named as class suit plaintiffs in the Human Rights Litigation Against the Estate of Ferdinand E. 
Marcos and in whose favor a final and executory judgment has been rendered by the United States District 
Court in the State of Hawaii shall be entitled to this disputable presumption that they are human rights 
violation victims (HRVV) as defined in this Act. This disputable presumption is subject to validation and may 
be contradicted or rebutted by competent evidence. 
SEC. 5. Conclusive Presumption that a Person is a Human Rights Violation Victim. - Any 
personls who have secured or can secure in their favor a judgment or award of damages from any court of 
the Philippines arising from a human rights violation as defined in Section 3 of this Act, even if the said 
judgment has not yet become final and executory, shall be considered conclusively as a human rights 
.'ctim without need of further proof: Provided, That the amount of the award shall be determined by the 
Board. 
SEC. 6. Other Claimants. - Any person who does not fall under the preceding Sections 4 or 5 but 
was an HRVV can file a claim with the Human Rights Victims Compensation Board for compensation 
andlor recognition. 
A claimant under Section 4 whose claim has been disallowed by the aforesaid Board cannot file a 
;[aim under this section. 
SEC. 7. Compensation. - Any HRVV qualified under this Act shall receive compensation from the 
State, free of tax, as herein prescribed: Provided, That for a deceased HRVV, his legal heirs as provided for 
in the Civil Code of the Philippines, or such other person named by the executor or administrator of the 
deceased HRVV's estate in that order, shall be entitled to receive such compensation: Provided, further, 
That no special power of attorney shall be recognized in the actual disbursement of the award, and only the 
victim or his aforestated successor(s)-in-interest shall be entitled to personally receive said compensation 
from the Board, unless the victim involved is shown to be incapacitated to the satisfaction of the Board: 
Provided, furthermore, That the compensation received under this Act shall be without prejudice to the 


receipt of any other sum by the HRVV from any other person or entity in any case involving violations of 
human rights as defined in this Act. 
SEC. 8. Amount of Compensation. - The amount of compensation under this Act shall be in 
proportion to the gravityof the human rights violation committed on the HRVV. 
SEC. 9. Source of Compensation. - The funds transferred to the government of the Republic of 
the Philippines by virtue of the December IO, 1997 Order of the Swiss Federal Supreme Court, which funds 
have been adjudged by the Supreme Court of the Philippines in G.R. no. 152154 (Republic vs. 
Sandiganbayan) as ill-gotten Marcos wealth and forfeited in favor of the Republic of the Philippines, shall 
i2 the principal source of funds for the implementation of this Act. The aforesaid judgment which was 
promulgated on July 15, 2003 has become final and executory. 
SEC. 10. Transfer of Funds. - Pursuant to the judgment mentioned in the preceding paragraph, 
the amount of Ten billion pesos (PlO,OOO,OOO,OOO.OO) 
is hereby set aside and appropriated to fund the 
purposes of this Act: Provided, that the said amount of Ten billion pesos (~10,000,000,000.00) shall be 
constituted as a separate account in the Bureau of the Treasury in trust for the HRVVs: Provided, further, 
'1 hat no amount from said account shall be disbursed, withdrawn or invested without the prior approval of 
the Human Rights Victims Compensation Board created herein: Provided, furthermore, That transfer of 
funds to the bank account of the Board shall be effected automatically upon submission to the Bureau of 
the Treasury by the Board of a duly approved Resolution on the utilization of the funds requested for 
release; and Provided, finaly, That no transfer or release of funds of more than fifty million pesos 
(~50,000,000.00) 
shall be effected in a single request for transfer or release of funds. 
SEC. 11. Documenfafion of Human Rights Violations During the Marcos Regime. - Without 
prejudice to other submissions which may be required by the board, in the implementation of this Act, any 
HRVV or his legal heirs or representative seeking compensation shall execute a detailed sworn statement, 
accompanied by photographs, letters, death certificate, pleadings and other judicial or quasi-judicial 
documents, newspaper or videotaped accounts, andlor materials or testimonials of witnesses corroborating 
and narrating the circumstances of the human right violation committed against the said HRVV. Such 
evidentiary proofs shall be compiled by the agencies mandated to implement this Act, with the assistance 
of the National Historical Institute ("I), 
the University of the Philippines (UP) and nongovernmental 


- 7 -  
organizations (NGO) whose assistance may be engaged. The compilation shall be submitted to the 
President, the Congress of the Philippines and the Supreme Court within two (2) years from the effectivity 
of this Act. 
SEC. 12. Human Rights Vicfims Compensation Board, Its Creation, Composition and Secretariat. 
- An independent Human Rights Victims Compensation Board, hereinafter referred to as the Board, is 
hereby created. It shall be composed of five (5) members of known probity, ability and integrity, each one 
with deep understanding of the human rights violations committed during the rule of Former President 
Ferdinand Marcos: Provided, That one (1) member shall come from the Government. 
The President of the Philippines shall choose and appoint the members of the Board from among a 
k t  of seven (7) nominees to be submitted by the following non-governmental organizations, which shall 
meet within fifteen (15) days from the effectivity of this Act: 
(1) 
(2) 
Task Force Detainees of the Philippines (TFDP); 
Free Legal Assistance Group (FLAG) and the Movement of Attorneys for Brotherhood, 
Integrity, and Nationalism, Inc. (MABINI); 
National Council of Churches in the Philippines (NCCP); and 
(3) 
(4) 
Medical Action Group (MAG). 
Upon their appointment by the President, the Board shall elect their Chairperson. 
The Board shall be attached to, but not under the control or supervision of the Commission on 
Human Rights (CHR). 
The Board shall organize itself within thirty (30) days from the appointment of ail five (5) members. 
Within thirty (30) days thereafter, it shall organize its secretariat who shall be exempted from Republic Act 
No. 6758, otherwise known as the Salary Standardization Law. 
SEC. 13. 
Operating Budget of the Board. 
- 
The initial amount of Ten million pesos 
(PlO,OOO,OOO.OO) 
for the operation of the Board shall be sourced from the Ten billion pesos 
(PlO,OOO,OOO,OOO.OO) 
stated in Section I O .  The subsequent amounts necessary for the operating budget of 
the board shall likewise be sourced from the same funds. 


- 8 -  
SEC. 14. Proper Disposition of Funds. - The Board shall ensure that the funds appropriated or 
which may become available as compensation for HRVVs are properly disbursed in accordance with the 
policy stated by Congress and relevant government accounting procedures. 
SEC. 15. Powers and Functions of fhe Board. - The Board shall have the following powers and 
functions: 
a) receive, evaluate, process and investigate applications for claims under this Act; 
b) conduct independent proceedings and resolve applications for claims by either granting or 
denying the same; 
c) deputize appropriate government agencies to assist it in order to effectively perform its 
functions; 
d) promulgate rules of procedure in the conduct of its proceedings with the revised rules of court 
of the Philippines having suppletory application; 
e) issue, serve and enforce subpoenas ad testificandum and subpoenas duces tecum; and 
9 exercise administrative control and supervision over its secretariat through the executive 
director. 
SEC. 16. lmplementing Rules and Regulations. - Within thirty (30) days from the date of its 
organization, the Board shall promulgate the necessary Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR) for the 
effective implementation of this Act. The IRR shall be effective fifteen (15) days after its publication in two 
(2) national newspapers of general circulation. 
SEC. 17. Salaries. - The Chair and members of the Board shall receive salaries and allowances 
equivalent to those of the Presiding Justice and Associate Justices of the Court of Appeals, respectively. 
SEC. 18. Determination ofAward. - The Board shall follow the point system in the determination of 
the award. The range shall be 1 to 10 points, as follows: 
a) victims who died shall be given 9 to 10 points; 
b) victims who were tortured shall be given 5 to 9 points; 
c) victims who were detained shall be given 2 to 4 points; and 
d) victims who were harassed and economically disadvantaged shall be given 1 point. 


. 9 .  
In each category, victims who had suffered more would receive more points. In instances where a 
victim falls under more than one category, he shall be awarded the points in the higher category. 
The Board shall divide the total amount available to be awarded under this act by the sum total of 
the points awarded to eligible claimants to determine the monetary value of each point. 
In order to determine the amount of compensation to be awarded to each eligible claimant, the 
total number of points he has received shall be multiplied by the monetary value of one point, 
The Board shall prioritize the payment of compensation to HRVVS or their legal heirs or 
representatives whose deaths, enforced disappearance, torture and/or prolonged detention have been well- 
publicized, of general public knowledge and/or indubitably established. 
SEC. 19. Non-Monetary Compensation. -The Department of Health, Department of Social Welfare 
nnd Development, Department of Education, the Commission on Higher Education, Technical Education 
and Skills Development Authority, and such other allied government agencies shall render the necessary 
services as nonmonetary compensation for HRVVs, as may be determined by the Board pursuant to the 
provisions of this Act. The amount necessary for this purpose shall be sourced from the budget of the 
agency concerned in the annual General Appropriations Act. 
The Commission on Human Rights shall monitor and facilitate the proper implementation of this 
(jrovision beyond the completion of the work of the Board as prescribed in Section 23 herein. 
SEC. 20. Period for Filing of Claims. -An HRVV shall file an application for compensation with the 
Board within three (3) months from the effectivity of the IRR of this Act: Provided, That for HRVVs who are 
deceased or incapacitated, their legal heirs or representatives, shall be entitled to file an application for 
compensation on their behalf. 
SEC. 21. Penalties. - Any claimant who is found by the Board, after due hearing, to have filed a 
false claim, shall be referred to the appropriate office for prosecution. If convicted, he shall suffer 
imprisonment of eight (8) to ten (IO) years, be deprived of the right to vote and to be elected to any public 
office and in applicable cases, be dismissed from government service and perpetually disqualified from 
appointment to a public office. 
Any member of the Board and its secretariat, public officer or employee of an agency mandated to 
implement this Act or any private individual who shall misuse, embezzle or misappropriate the funds for the 


-10- 
compensation of HRVVs or who shall commit fraud in the processing of documents and claims of HRVVs, 
or shall conspire with any individual to commit the same, shall suffer imprisonment of ten (IO) to fifteen (15) 
years in addition to the other penalties provided for in the Revised Penal Code and relevant special penal 
laws. 
SEC. 22. Roll of Vicfims. - Persons who are established to be HRVVs shall be given recognition 
by the enshrinement of their names in a Roll of victims of Human Rights violations to be prepared by the 
Board. The Roll shall be filed with the National Library and in such offices or agencies, both national and 
international, which are dedicated to the prevention of human rights abuses. The National Historical 
Institute shall erect in a conspicuous location in the national capital region an appropriate memorial, shrine 
or monument honoring these HRVVs. 
SEC. 23. Joint Congressional Oversight Committee. - An Oversight Committee is hereby created 
composed of three (3) members each from the Senate and the House of Representatives to monitor and 
evaluate the implementation of this Act. 
c 
SEC. 24, Period, - The Board shall complete its work within two (2) years from the effectivity of 
the IRR promulgated by the Board. 
SEC. 25. Repealing Clause. - Section 63(b) of Republic Act No. 6657, as amended, otherwise 
known as the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Law of 1988, is hereby amended to the extent that it will 
conform with this Act. All laws, decrees, executive orders, rules and regulations or parts thereof 
inconsistent with any of the provisions of this Act are hereby repealed, amended or modified accordingly. 
SEC. 26. Separability Clause. - If any section or provision of this Act is declared unconstitutional 
or invalid, such other sections or provisions not affected thereby shall remain in full force and effect. 
SEC. 27. Effectivity Clause. - This Act shall take effect fifteen (15) days after its publication in at 
! x s t  two (2) national newspapers of general circulation. 
Approved,