FOURTEENTH CONGRESS OF THE REPLA5LIC 
) 
1 
a 
1 f 
:)? 
OF THE Pi-llLlPPiMES 
First Regular Session 
1 
S E N A T E  
4 
Senate Bill No. .I. 
No money shall be paid out of the Treasury except in pursuance of an 
appropriation made by law. (Sec. 29 (I) Art. VI, Constitution). The power of 
appropriation is described by James Madison as the "spending power." Thus, it is 
the most important prerogative of Congress. Indeed, while the power of the 
"sword" is attributed to the Executive and the power of the "pen" to the Judiciary, 
the power of the "purse" belongs to the Legislature. 
Unfortunately, that power of the "purse" has been diluted by Presidential 
Decree Nos. 81, 1177 and 1967 because they mandated the automatic 
appropriation of debt payment and converted Congress into a mere rubber- 
stamp. 
Ironicalfy, debt service had been eating up a big chunk of our budget. 
Currently, of the P1.138 trillion national budget, P318 billion, or 28%, has been 
earmarked for debt service (interest payment), thus, leaving Congress with 
authority to scrutinize only the remaining 72% but leaving debt service as is. 
Several attempts in the past had been exerted even by distinguished 
members of this august body to seek judicial nullification of these Presidential 
Decrees but to no avail as the consistent response of the Supreme Court even to 
members of this Branch of the Government had been that if we want to rid 
ourselves of these bad laws (P.D. Nos. 81, 1177 and 1967), we must repeal 
them. In the case of Teofisfo T. Guingona, Jr. and Aguiho Q. Pimentel, Jr. vs. 
Hon. Guillermo Carague, 196 SCRA 221 (1991), 
the High Court ruled: 
"The Court, therefore, finds that R.A. No. 4860, as amended by 
P.D. No. 81, Section 31 of P.D. 1177 and P.D. No, 1967 constitute lawful 
authorizations or appropriations, unless they are repealed or otherwise 
amended by Congress. The Executive was thus merely complying with the 
duty to implement the same. 
There can be no question as to the patriotism and good motive of 
petitioners in filing this petition. Unfortunately, the petition must fail on the 
constitutional and legal issues raised. As to whether or not the country 
should honor its international debt, more especially the enormous amount 
that had been incurred by the past administration, which appears to be the 
ultimate objective of the petition, is not an issue that is presented or 
proposed to be addressed by the Court. Indeed, it is more of a political 
decision for Congress and the Executive to determine in the exercise of 
their wisdom and sound discretion."[At p. 2381 


The subsequent case of Philconsa, Wigbedo Tanada, Albedo Romulo, 
Raul S. Roco, Nepfali A. Gonzales, Edgardo J. Angara vs. Hon. Salvador 
Enriquez, 235 SCRA 506 (1994), reiterated the same pronouncement and went 
on further to state that “a provision in an appropriations act cannot be used to 
repeal or amend other laws.” 
and, thus, should be stricken off our statute books now and forever. 
Yes, these PDs were craned during the one-man rule of Pres. Marcos 
A noted Constitutionalist and Professorial Lecturer in the University of the 
Philippines, Bartolorne C. Fernandez, Jr., in his dissertation Congressional 
Power of the Purse Vis-A-Vis Automatic Appropriations for Debt Servicing, Vol. 
XVII, The Lawyers Review No. 1, p. 4, Jan. q993, posed the following questions: 
xxx. 
4. Will the operationalization of the automatic appropriation scheme 
continue in perpetuity given the seemingly blind obeisance to the 
questioned decrees on the part of both the Legislative and the Executive? 
When will it end, if at all? 
5. Will not the time come around when items under the all-encompassing 
automatic appropriation would comprise the bulk of the GAA, thereby 
virtually emasculating Congress regarding its power of appropriation? 
6. When will Congress come around to regaining and reasserting its 
power of the purse under the 1987 Constitution regarding such automatic 
appropriations? 
7. When will Congress come around reasserting its role as the policy- 
determining body of the government as envisioned under the Constitution 
by determining by itself, in the course of the legislative process, the proper 
appropriations for debt servicing which, admittedly, is a matter of policy? 
8. How long will Congress allow itself to be rendered impotent by 
anachronistic presidential decrees of martial law vintage which, according 
to the dissenting opinion of Justice lsagani A. Cruz in the Guingona case, 
“are on the whole tainted with authoritarianism and enfeebled by lack of 
proper study and draftsmanship, let alone suspect motives.”? 
9. Will the present Congress be emboldened to demonstrate political will 
and strike down once and for all these decrees and consign them to 
oblivion? 
x x x. [at p. 71 
Verily, the bill will once and for all cleanse our statute books of remaining 
vestiges of martial rule and restore to Congress its enviable, absolute and 
exclusive “power of the purse.” 
RClTO ESTRA 
Senator 


S E N A T E  
INTRODUCED BY SEN. ~
~
~
G
~
Q
Y
 
EJERGlTO ~ S ~ R A ~ A  
AN ACT 
RESTORING TO CONGRESS THE POWER TO A ~ ~ ~ O P ~ ~ A T E  
P A ~ ~ E N T S  
ON DEBT SERVICE, REVIVING FOR THE PURPOSE SECTION 6 0% 
REPUBLIC ACT NO. 4860 (Foreign 
orrowing Act), AND REPEALING 
SECTION 7 OF PRESIDENTPAL DECREE NO. 81, SECTION 31 OF 
PRESIDENTIAL DECREE NO. 1177 AN 
SECTIONS '!,a AND 3 OF 
PRESIDENTIAL DECREE NO. 1967 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the Philippines in 
Congress assembled: 
SECTION 1. Statement of Policy. - The Constitution vests upon and 
mandates Congress to enact appropriation measures for government 
expenditure whether domestic or foreign. However, because of the continued 
effectivity of certain Presidential Decrees of former Pres. Ferdinand Marcos 
providing for the automatic appropriation of amounts as payments for foreign 
debts in the annual budget without need of congressional action since 1972 up to 
the present, Congress is revoking these presidential decrees and restoring to it 
full power to exercise its authority in determining the necessary but reasonable 
amount as part of the annual budget that may be appropriated to service the 
country's foreign debts with due regard to domestic but equally vital government 
services that need equal appropriation to bring about a balanced government 
expenditure program. 
SEC. 2. Revival of the Original Text of Section 6 of Republic Act. No. 
4860. - Section 6 of Republic Act No. 4860 otherwise known as the "Foreign 
Borrowing Act" as amended by Republic Act No. 6142 which had been amended 
by Section 7 of Presidential Decree No. 81, Section 31 of Presidential Decree 
No.1177 and Sections I ,  2 and 3 of Presidential Decree No. 1967 is hereby 
revived as follows: 
Section 6. Any provision of law to the contrary notwithstanding, and 
in order to enable the Republic of the Philippines to pay the principal, 
interest, taxes and other normal banking charges on the loans, credits or 
indebtedness, or on the bonds, debentures, securities or other evidences 
of indebtedness sold in international markets under the authority of this 
Act, all the revenue realized from the projects financed by such loans, 
credits or indebtedness, or on the bonds, debentures, securities or other 
evidences of indebtedness, shall be turned over in full, after deducting 
actual and necessary expenses for the operation and maintenance of said 


projects, to the National Treasury by the government office, agency or 
instrumentality, 
or 
government-owned 
or 
controlled 
corporation 
concerned, which is hereby appropriated for the purpose as and when 
they shall become due. In case the revenue realized is insufficient to cover 
the principal, intersst and other charges, such portion of the budgetary 
savings as may be necessary to cover the balance or deficiency shall be 
set aside exclusively for the purpose by the government office, agency or 
instrumentality, 
or 
government-owned 
or 
controlled 
corporation 
concerned: Provided, That, if there still remains a deficiency, the Congress 
shall appropriate the necessary amount of any funds in the National 
Treasury not otherwise appropriated, to. cover the payment of the principal 
and interest on such loans, credits or indebtedness as and when they 
shall become due: Provided, furfher, That the Monetary Board shall make 
provisions out of current foreign exchange receipts for the foreign 
exchange requirements to service the external debt. 
SEG. 3. Repeal of Secfion 7 of Presidential Decree No. 81, Section 31 of 
Presidential Decree No. I I77 and Sections 1, 2 and 3 of Presidential Decree No. 
1967. - Section 7 of Presidential Decree No. 81, Section 31 of Presidential 
Decree No. 1177 and Sections 1, 2 and 3 of Presidential Decree No. 1967 and 
other provisions of said decrees which are inconsistent herewith are hereby 
REPEALED. 
SEC. 4. Effecfivify. -This Act shall take effect upon its approval. 
Approved,