Republic of the Philippines
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Quezon City

FIFTEENTH CONGRESS
Second Regular Session

House Bill No. 5764

Introduced by: Congressman Lord Allan Jay Q. Velasco

EXPLANATORY NOTE

The Revised Penal Code (RPC), also known as Act 3815, had been enacted way back in
December 8, 1930. While the RPC governed our penal laws for more than eight decades
the amounts of monetary fines or penalties punishing crimes remain unchanged, this,
despite the devaluation and inflation which our currency has undergone thru more than
cight decades.

In order to uphold the full force and teeth of our penal laws the punishment for
offenses/crimes including the fine, imprisonment and civil disqualification components
must be up to date. With regard to the fine component the amounts are still based on 1930
prices, the year the law was enacted. The massive inflation and devaluation our currency
has gone through renders the punitive fine component of the RPC negligible. It is in this
ight that an adjustment of the fine through an amendment is highly in order.

The outdated fines incorporated in the RPC are vividly exhibited in Art. 313 of said law
wherein the penalty for Altering Boundaries or Landmarks is punishable by “arresto
menor or a fine not exceeding 100 pesos, or both” This amount is grossly insufficient in
today’s standard.

The present bill humbly suggests a new amount, subject to the committee's discretion,
replacing the old one using a formula utilizing the available data from the National
Statistics Coordination Board relating to Consumer Price Indexes.

In adjusting the fines accurately the inflation rate computed from 1930 up to the present
must be computed. However, there is no data available for the CPI (Consumer Price
Index) earlier than 1955 in the Philippines and no data available for the CPI from 1986 to
1988. Moreover, there had been a total of 8 rebasing of base years for the computation of
inflation rates (the purpose of rebasing is to make relevant or update the items included in
the basket of goods).


Given these limitations, the year 1955 is used as the base year for the computation up to
2011 and disregarding the inflation rate in the years 1986 to 1988 making the derived
inflation rate a conservative one. Using the derived inflation rate of 8, 012% we can
now compute the adjusted value of fines after factoring in the change in prices in the
Philippines, more precisely the effect of inflation rate.

‘The computation yields the adjusted value of 8,012 for the “100 pesos” maximum fine
for the crime of Altering Boundaries or Landmarks. But for purposes of convenience it is
rounded off to 8,000 pesos.
Thus, Art 313 of the RPC should be amended to read:
Art. 313. Altering boundaries or landmarks. — Any person who shall alter
the boundary marks or monuments of towns, provinces, or estates, or any
other marks intended to designate the boundaries of the same, shall be
punished by arresto menor or a fine not exceeding 8,000 pesos, or both.

This moment is certainly the best and opportune time to amend the above mentioned
article of our antiquated RPC.

Immediate passage of this bill is earnestly sought.

LORD ALLAN JAY Q. VELASCO


Republic of the Philippines
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Quezon City

FIFTEENTH CONGRESS
Second Regular Session

House Bill No. 784

Introduced by Congressman Lord Allan Jay Q. Velasco

AN ACT AMMENDING ARTICLE 313 OF ACT NO. 3815, AS AMENDED,
OTHERWISE KNOWN AS THE REVISED PENAL CODE

Be it enacted by the Senate and the House of Representatives of the Philippines in
Congress as assembled:
SECTION 1. Article 313 of Act No. 3815, as amended, otherwise known as the
Revised Penal Code, is hereby further amended to read as follows:

Art. 313. Altering boundaries or landmarks. — Any person who shall alter
the boundary marks or monuments of towns, provinces, or estates, or any
other marks intended to designate the boundaries of the same, shall be
punished by arresto menor or a fine not exceeding 8,000 pesos, or both.

SECTION. 2. Repealing Clause. — Any law, presidential decree or issuance, executive
order, letter of instruction, administrative order, rule or regulation contrary to or
inconsistent with the provision of this Act is hereby repealed, modified or amended

accordingly.

SECTION 3. Effectivity Clause — This Act shall take effect fifteen (15) days after its
publication in the Official Gazette or at least two (2) newspapers of general circulation.

Approved,