HOUSEOF 86

ENTATNES

RECENED
Republic of the Philippines a
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES DaTegO JU 20g __«
Quezon City “TIME: 122 3

RY:
SEVENTEENTH CONGRESS
First Regular Session

House Bill Nos) _16

Introduced by HON, ROZZANO RUFINO B. BIAZON

EXPLANATORY NOTE

This bill seeks to restore the death penalty for heinous crimes covered under Republic
Act No. 9165 (RA 9165), otherwise known as the “Comprehensive Dangerous Drugs Act of
2002", as amended.

‘The impunity by which criminals carry on with their dastardly acts makes it appear
if we are not a nation of laws. We are confronted almost every day by reports in the tri-me
of children still learning how to walk being raped or of senior citizens who are in their
twilight years being bludgeoned to death right in their very own homes.

‘These barbaric acts are, more often than not, committed by the perpetrators under the
influence of drugs. Such crimes leave wailing parents, sons, daughters, brothers, sisters and
their relatives who are scarred and traumatized for the rest of their lives crying and
demanding for justice.

Article IIT, Section 19 (1) of the 1987 Constitution established a general State policy
against the death penalty, unless for compelling reasons. Republic Act No. 7659 imposed the
death penalty for cases identified as heinous crimes such as murder. Republic Act No. 9165,
otherwise known as the “Comprehensive Dangerous Drugs Act of 2002” was enacted to
combat the growing menace of the illegal drug trade in the country. The law also imposed the
extreme penalty of death for illegal drug traffickers and their cohorts.

Up until 2006, the Philippines was just one of a handful of countries in the world that
imposes the death penalty as capital punishment for criminals found guilty beyond reasonable
doubt. Clamors and intense lobbying from various interest groups led by the Catholic Church
succeeded in changing the mindset of legislators.

‘On June 24, 2006, during the Second Session of the Thirteenth Congress of the
Philippines, Republic Act No, 9346 (RA 9346) was enacted. This law prohibits the
imposition of the extreme penalty of death to criminals found guilty beyond reasonable
doubt. The passage of said law became a statement of the Republic of the Philippines for the

REGISTRATION UT
BILLS AND INDEX SERVICE


intemational community to see that it is shying away from the policy of using the death
penalty to punish criminals found guilty of committing heinous crimes.

However, Article Ill, Section 19 (1) of the 1987 Constitution did not per se abolish
the death penalty. It gave Congress the power to impose the death penalty “for compelling
reasons involving heinous crimes”. Although RA 9346 did prohibit the imposition of the
death penalty, Congress still has the discretion to restore it if it deems it necessary.

Now, more than ever, is the time that it is ne
penalty for crimes covered under RA 9165.

sary for Congress to restore death

‘The menace of the illegal drug trade remains unabated despite the concerted efforts of
the Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency (PDEA) and other government law enforcement
agencies to curb the same. Those involved in this illicit industry that destroys the basic
institution of the family, takes the lives of its victims and wreaks havoc in Philippine society,
have been emboldened due to the non-imposition of the death penalty on cases covered by
RA 9165,

It has always been argued that there is no evidence that the death penalty serves as a
deterrent to deadly criminals. Hence, life should not be destroyed just in the hope that other
lives might be saved. There may be truth to such an argument but the fear of dying is also a
strong motivation to hinder an individual from doing a certain type of activity — such as
selling illegal drugs to people.

Another argument against death penalty is that imprisonment is sufficient punishment
for those who commit crimes and are convicted, It is even argued that reform is possible
when a convict experiences incarcerated life.

On the contrary, our own experience has shown that incarceration does not deter one
who is convicted of drug trafficking from committing the same crime. There have been
instances where the convicted trafficker continues to deal in the illegal drug trade even
behind bars. They continue to profit from the misery of others, to the detriment of society,
under a very secure base of operations — our prisons,

Considering that the Constitution grants Congress the flexibility to impose the death
penalty under certain circumstances and based on the current wisdom of the times, it is best
to once again restore the penalty of death for crimes under RA 9165. This is to put back into
the consciousness of those involved in the illegal drugs trade that the ultimate punishment of
death awaits them should they continue with their nefarious acts,

In view of the foregoing, the urgent passage of this bill is earnestly sought.

he. be B. BIAZON

Representative
Lone District, Muntinlupa City


Republic of the Philippines
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Quezon City

SEVENTEENTH CONGRESS
First Regular Session

28 16

House Bill No,

Introduced by: HON, ROZZANO RUFINO B. BIAZON
—————

AN ACT
AMENDING SECTION ONE OF REPUBLIC ACT NUMBERED NINE THOUSAND
THREE HUNDRED FORTY-SIX OTHERWISE KNOWN AS “AN ACT
PROHIBITING THE IMPOSITION OF DEATH PENALTY IN THE PHILIPPINES”.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the Philippines in
Congress assembled:

SECTION 1. Section 1 of Republic Act No. 9346 is hereby amended to read as
follows:

“Section 1. The imposition of the penalty of death is hereby
prohibited[.], EXCEPT FOR CRIMES SPECIFIED UNDER REPUBLIC
ACT NUMBERED NINE THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED SIXTY-FIVE,
OTHERWISE KNOWN AS THE “COMPREHENSIVE DANGEROUS
DRUGS ACT OF 2002, (R. A. No. 9165)” AS AMENDED, IMPOSING
DEATH PENALTY. [Accordingly, Republic Act No. Eight Thousand One
Hundred Seventy-Seven (R. A. No. 8177), otherwise known as the Act
Designating Death By Lethal Injection is hereby repealed.| Republic Act No.
Seven Thousand Six Hundred Fifty-Nine (R. A. No. 7659), otherwise known
as the Death Penalty Law, and all other laws, executive orders and decrees,
insofar as they impose the death penalty are hereby repealed or amended
accordingly.”

Sec. 2, Death by Lethal Injection, ~ The imposed penalty of death for crimes
specified under R. A. No. 9165, as amended, shall be carried out through lethal injection, For
this purpose, R. A. No. 8177 is hereby re-enacted.

Seo. 3. Repealing Clause. ~ Republic Act Numbered Nine Thousand Three Hundred
Forty-Six Otherwise Known As “An Act Prohibiting The Imposition Of Death Penalty In The
Philippines” and such other laws, executive orders, rules and regulations inconsistent with, or
contrary to this Act, are hereby repealed or amended accordingly.


Sec. 4. Separability Clause. — If any provision of this Act or the application of such
provision is declared unconstitutional or invalid, the provisions not affected thereby shall
remain in full force and effect,

Sec. 5. Effectivity Clause. ~ This Act shall take effect after fifteen (15) days from its
publication in at least two (2) newspapers of national circulation.

Approved,