Republic of the Philippines
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Quezon City

FIFTEENTH CONGRESS
First Regular Session

HOUSE BILL No. 2844

Introduced by Reps. TEDDY A. CASINO, NERI JAVIER COLMENARES,
RAYMOND V. PALATINO, ANTONIO L. TINIO, RAFAEL V, MARIANO,
LUZYIMINDA C. ILAGAN and EMERENCIANA A, DE JESUS

EXPLANATORY NOTE

‘The controversial nursing board exam of 2006 brought to the fore not only the problem of
cheating conducted by some nursing review centers but other irregularities as well.

Among these are the exorbitant fees collected by nursing schools for the inclusion of
board exam review sessions in their curriculum. In many cases, these fees are collected as a
requirement for graduation, A common practice in courses requiting professional licensing
examinations is for students to be forced to pay for review sessions in a particular review
center of the school’s choice. These review sessions are often counted as required subjects,
with corresponding units that have to be earned.

While it is imperative to ensure that students pass their board exams, an exclusive partnership
between a nursing school and a review center is unnecessary and often results in a collusion to
charge higher, unjustifiable fees from students and their parents. This is especially true in a
situation where students are not given the chance to choose review centers thar are more
accessible and affordable to them. In the first place, review courses are supposed to be optional
and do not form part of the curriculum.

This bill aims precisely to protect the rights of students to choose their own review centers.
Any school which compels its students to take board review classes or study in a particular
review center will be penalized and their permit to operate revoked. Also, the withholding of
any essential scholastic document by the school to pressure the students into enrolling in a
particular review center will be deemed unlawful.

Filed last Congress as House Bill no. 2380 and later substituted and approved on ‘Third Reading
as House Bill no. 6841, this legislation unfortunately did not become a law due to the absence of
a counterpart bill in Senate.

Immediate passage of this bill is earnestly sought.

Approved,


——

Ca

TEDDY A. CASINO
Bayan Muna Party-list

ACT Partyclist

e
iSasibios c igi”
Gabriela Women’s Party

RAYMOASB V. PALATINO
rataan Party-list

FAEL V.
Anakpawis Partyclist

AC —/

EMERENCIANA A. DE JESUS
Gabriela Women’s Party


Republic of the Philippines
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES,
Quezon City

FIFTEENTH CONGRESS
First Regular Session

HOUSEBILL No. 2844

Introduced by Reps. TEDDY A. CASINO, NERI JAVIER COLMENARES,
RAYMOND V. PALATINO, ANTONIO L. TINIO, RAFAEL V. MARIANO,
LUZVIMINDA C. ILAGAN and EMERENCIANA A. DE JESUS

AN ACT
PROTECTING THE RIGHT OF STUDENTS OF COURSES REQUIRING
PROFESSIONAL LICENSING EXAMINATIONS TO ENROLL IN REVIEW
CENTERS OF THEIR CHOICE AND PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR
VIOLATIONS THEREOF

Be it enacted by the Senate and the House of Representatives of the Philippines in Congress assembled:

SECTION 1. Declaration of Policies. It is the declared policy of the State to promote and
protect the right to education as enshrined in the Philippine Constitution. While the State
recognizes the complimentary roles of public and private institutions in the enhancement and
strengthening of the educational system, itis also the responsibility of the state to ensure the

protection of students against possible abuses by Higher Educational Institutions in the interest
of profit.

SECTION 2. Coverage. ‘Uhis Act shall cover all public and private HEI cluding local
colleges and universities, offering courses that require professional licensure examinations.

SECTION 3. Unlawful acts. In recognition of the student’s freedom to choose his/her
review center, the following acts by HEIs shall be considered unlawful

1. Compelling students enrolled in courses requiring professional examinations to take
review classes in a review center of the HED’s choice;

2. Making such review classes as prerequisites for graduation or completion of the course;
and

3. Withholding the transcript of scholastic records, diploma, certification or any essential
document of the student to be used in support of the application for the professional
licensure examinations so as to compel the students to attend a review center of the
HET’s choice.


SECTION 4. Penalties. Any HEI official or employee found guilty of violating any of the
unlawful acts enumerated in Section 3 of this Act shall suffer the penalty of prision correctional or
imprisonment from six (6) months and one (1) day to six (6) years.

In addition, the Commission on Higher Education (CHED) may impose disciplinary sanctions
against a HEI official or employee violating this Act pursuant to Section 13 of Republic Act No.
7722, otherwise known as the Higher Education Modernization Act of 1994.

SECTION 5. Implementing Rules and Regulations. The CHED shall be tasked to

issue the implementing rules and regulations of this Act within thirty (30) days after this law
takes effect.

SECTION 6. Separability Clause. Should any provision herein be declared unconstitutional,
the same shall not affect the validity of the other provisions of this Act.

SECTION 7. Repealing Clause. All laws, rules and regulations inconsistent with the
provisions of this Act are hereby amended, modified or repealed accordingly.

Section 8. Effectivity Clause. This act shall take effect fifteen (15) days after its
publication in the Official Gazette or in two (2) newspapers of general circulation in the
Philippines.

Approwd,