Republic of the Philippines
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
Quezon City
TWENTIETH CONGRESS
First Regular Session
HOUSE BILL NO. 3195
Introduced by REP. EMILIO BERNARDINO L. YULO
EXPLANATORY NOTE
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly reshaping industries, societies, and global
economies, bringing forth unprecedented opportunities and equally complex risks. As AI
continues to influence various aspects of everyday life, it becomes imperative for the
Philippine government to proactively establish a comprehensive, forward-looking
regulatory framework that ensures the safe, ethical, and beneficial use of this
transformative technology.
This bill seeks to institutionalize a robust policy and governance structure for the
development, application, and regulation of AI in the Philippines. As AI systems become
more autonomous and embedded in decision-making processes, this bill affirms the
fundamental rights of Filipinos by ensuring protection from unsafe, ineffective, or
discriminatory AI systems, preserving the right to privacy, mandating transparency, and
guaranteeing accessible remedies.
This supports the
people-centric approach to
technological progress, where innovation must never come at the cost of individual rights,
public safety, and democratic values.
In recent years, countries like the United States, European Union members, and
Singapore have enacted national AI strategies, recognizing the technology’s critical role
in the Fourth Industrial Revolution. The Philippines cannot afford to lag behind. By
enacting this measure, the country will not only safeguard its citizens from the misuse of
AI, but also position itself as a regional leader in ethical AI innovation and governance.
In view of the foregoing, the passage of this bill is earnestly sought.
REP. EMILIO BERNARDINO L. YULO
August 6, 2025
11:41 am


Republic of the Philippines
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 
Quezon City
TWENTIETH CONGRESS
First Regular Session
HOUSE BILL NO. 3195
Introduced by REP. EMILIO BERNARDINO L. YULO
AN ACT
ESTABLISHING
A
REGULATORY
FRAMEWORK
FOR
A
ROBUST,
RELIABLE, AND TRUSTWORTHY DEVELOPMENT, APPLICATION, AND
USE
OF
ARTIFICIAL
INTELLIGENCE
SYSTEMS,
CREATING
THE
PHILIPPINE COUNCIL ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, DELINEATING
THE ROLES OF VARIOUS GOVERNMENT AGENCIES, DEFINING AND
PENALIZING CERTAIN PROHIBITED ACTS
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the Philippines in Congress
assembled:
CHAPTER I
GENERAL PROVISIONS
SECTION 1. Short Title. – This Act shall be known as the "Artificial Intelligence
Development and Regulation Act".
SEC. 2. Declaration of Policy. – The State recognizes that science and
technology are essential for national development and progress, driving innovation,
education, and overall national competitiveness. It shall support their application in
various aspects of national life, including economic growth, social development, and
national security. To this end, the State shall pursue the development of artificial
intelligence (AI), including digitization and infrastructure, workforce development,
research and development, and regulation with the end view of harnessing Al's potentials
to uplift the lives of Filipinos.


SEC. 3. Definition of Terms. – For purposes of this Act, the following terms shall
be defined as stated below:
(a) Algorithm refers to a process or set of rules to be followed in calculations or
other problem-solving operations, especially by a computer;
(b) Algorithmic decisions refer to the analysis of large amounts of personal data to
infer correlations or, more generally, to derive information deemed useful to make
decisions;
(c) Artificial Intelligence (AI) refers to the simulation of human intelligence in
machines that are programmed to think like humans and mimic their actions.
(d) Artificial Intelligence eco-system refers to a group of Al systems which are
coupled together to some extent to achieve a common goal. The most common goal of
establishing an Al ecosystem is automation via applied machine learning. This is
generally achieved by putting Al systems in both real-time as well as historical scenarios
and generating intelligence out of it.
(e) Artificial Intelligence system refers to a computer system or software
application that utilizes Al technologies and techniques to perform a task or make a
decision such as machine learning, deep learning, natural language processing, and
robotics;
(f) Augmentation refers to the process of allowing human collaboration with
machines to perform a task;
(g) Automated decision refers to the process of making a decision by automated
means without any human involvement;
(h) Automation refers to the creation and application of technologies to produce
and deliver goods and services with minimal human intervention;
(i) Innovation refers to the creation of new ideas that results in the development of
new or improved policies, products, processes, or services which are then spread or
transferred across the market;
(j) Lethal autonomous weapons systems (LAWS) refer to weapons that use
artificial intelligence to identify, select, and kill human targets without human
intervention;


(k) Regulatory sandbox refers to a regulatory approach, typically summarized in
writing and published, that allows live, time-bound testing of innovations under a
regulator's oversight; and
(1) Social scoring refers to the act of rating a person's level of influence based on
evaluating one's followers, friends, and postings on social networks such as Twitter and
Facebook.
CHAPTER II
GUIDING PRINCIPLES
SEC. 4. Principles. – The development, application, and use of AI systems shall
be guided by the following principles:
(a) Inclusive growth, sustainable development, and well-being. – Consistent with
the provisions of Republic Act No. 11293, otherwise known as the "Philippine
Innovation Act" and other existing laws, the development, application, and use of AI
must contribute to the developmental goals of the country;
(b) Human-centered values and fairness. – AI systems must treat people with
dignity and respect;
(c) Robustness, security and safety. – AI must be reliable and safe and ensure that
the public is protected from errors in processing and outcomes;
(d) Accountability. – AI system must provide disclosure of information that
enables monitoring, checking or criticism and allow automation auditing to ensure that
entities deploying AI technologies are accountable for their consequences;
(e) Transparency and Explainability. – Policies, rules and regulations governing
AI systems must be understandable and ensure that automated and algorithmic decisions
and any associated data driving those decisions can be explained to end-users and
stakeholders in non-technical terms; and
(f) Trust. – AI systems must be transparent; accurate and reliable; provide
augmentation; and protect privacy.


CHAPTER III
AI BILL OF RIGHTS
SEC. 5. Bill of Rights. – The development, application, and use of AI systems
shall be guided by the following rights of every Filipino:
(a) Right to Protection from Unsafe and Ineffective AI Systems. – The right of
every people to be protected from harmful AI systems shall be inviolable. AI systems,
tools, and technologies shall be developed with consultation from diverse communities,
stakeholders, and domain experts to identify concerns, risks, and potential impacts of the
system. Systems shall undergo pre-deployment testing, risk identification and mitigation,
and ongoing monitoring that demonstrate they are safe and effective based on their
intended use, mitigation of unsafe outcomes including those beyond the intended use, and
adherence to domain-specific standards.
(b) Right Against Algorithmic Discrimination. – No person shall be discriminated
by algorithms and AI systems on the basis of ethnicity, sex, related medical conditions,
gender identity, religion, age, national origin, disability, genetic information, or any other
classification protected by law. Designers, developers, and deployers of AI systems shall
take proactive and continuous measures to protect individuals and communities from
algorithmic discrimination and shall use and design systems in an equitable manner.
To protect equal rights, proactive equity assessments as part of the system design,
use of representative data and protection against proxies for demographic features,
ensuring accessibility for people with disabilities in design and development, pre-
deployment and ongoing disparity testing and mitigation, and clear organizational
oversight shall be instituted. Independent evaluation and plain language reporting in the
form of an algorithmic impact assessment, including disparity testing results and
mitigation information, shall be performed and made public whenever possible to
confirm these protections.
(c) Right to Privacy. – Every people shall be protected from violations of privacy
through design choices that ensure such protections are included by default. Data
collection that conforms to reasonable expectations and that only data strictly necessary
for the specific context is collected shall be ensured. Designers, developers, and


deployers of AI systems shall seek permission and respect the decisions of every person
regarding collection, use, access, transfer, and deletion data in appropriate ways and to
the greatest extent possible. Alternative privacy by design safeguards shall be used
whenever applicable. Systems shall not employ user experience and design decisions that
obfuscate user choice or burden users with defaults that are privacy invasive. Consent
shall only be used to justify collection of data in cases where it can be appropriately and
meaningfully given.
Every person shall have the right to privacy. The processing of personal data in
the use of ai systems shall be subject to compliance with the requirements of Republic
Act No. 10173, otherwise known as the “Data Privacy Act of 2012” and other laws
allowing disclosure of information to the public and adherence to the general data privacy
principles. Designers, developers, and deployers of AI systems shall consider the
appropriate and proper legal basis when processing personal data and respect the
decisions of every person regarding the processing of their personal data. Privacy-by-
design safeguards should be employed as early as the development of AI systems.
Systems must not use user experience or design decisions that obscure user choice or
burden users with defaults that infringe on privacy. Every individual shall be protected
from data privacy violations through design choices that ensure such protections are
included in the systems by default. Consent shall be considered on an appropriate lawful
basis when it is freely given, specifically, an informed indication of will and evidenced
by written, electronic, or recorded means.
(d) Right to Know. – Designers, developers, and deployers of AI systems shall
provide generally accessible plain language documentation including clear descriptions
of the overall system functioning and the role automation plays including notice that such
systems are in use, the individual or organization responsible for the system, and
explanations of outcomes that are clear, timely, and accessible. Such notice shall be kept
up-to-date and people impacted by the system shall be notified of significant use case or
key functionality changes.
(e) Right to Remedy. – Every people shall be given an opportunity to opt out from
AI systems in favor of a human alternative, where appropriate. They shall have access to
timely human consideration and remedy through a fallback and escalation process if an


automated system fails or produces an error. The right to appeal or contest AI’s impacts
on every person shall not be denied. Human consideration and fallback shall at all times
be accessible, equitable, effective, maintained and shall not impose an unreasonable
burden to the public.
CHAPTER IV
PHILIPPINE COUNCIL ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
SEC. 6. Philippine Council on Artificial Intelligence. – There is hereby created a
policy-making and advisory body of experts under the Department of Information and
Communications Technology (DICT) to be known as the Philippine Council on Artificial
Intelligence (PCAI), herein after referred to as the Council.
The Council shall engage AI expertise and may call upon technical resource
persons from the agencies of government, the private sector, and civil society
organizations.
It may call upon any official, agent, employee, agency or instrumentality of the
government for any assistance that they may deem necessary to carry out the purposes of
this Act and said agency or instrumentality of the government shall, with the approval of
the President, assign the official, agent, or employee and provide the assistance requested
by the Council.
The Council shall have a core committee composed of an AI researcher, robotics
specialist; a machine learning expert; a data science specialist; a technology expert; an
ethicist; a sociologist or anthropologist, a psychologist; a public health expert; a security
analyst; a legal scholar; a human rights advocate; a citizens' representative; and such
other experts that the President of the Philippines may appoint. The members of the core
committee shall elect from among themselves its Chairperson and other officers as may
be necessary.
The core committee shall create subcommittees or technical working groups as
maybe necessary for the effective and efficient performance of its powers and duties as
the public interest may require.


The core committee members shall be appointed by the President for a term of
three (3) years except for the AI researcher, robotics specialist, machine learning expert,
data science specialist, technology expert, and ethicist who shall serve for a term of four
(4) years: Provided. That no member shall serve for more than three (3) consecutive
terms: Provided, further, That the members of the core committee shall receive an
honorarium in accordance with existing policies: Provided, furthermore, That the
Department of Science and Technology (DOST) shall promulgate the nomination process
for all core committee members with a clear set of qualifications, credentials and
recommendations from the sectors concerned.
SEC. 7. Powers and Functions. – The Council shall have the following powers
and functions:
(a) Conduct an evaluation on the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) systems and
development of AI economies in the country.
(b) Review existing policies on AI
(c) Determine the structures or parameters under which AI systems may operate;
(d) Develop and promulgate a governance framework based on fundamental
guiding principles on the development, application, and use of AI;
(e) Establish a code of ethics for AI developers for a progressive industry
regulation;
(f) Promulgate rules to prevent abusive and harmful applications of AI;
(g) Prepare mitigation measures against the potential consequences and impacts of
algorithms to processes and business models;
(h) Formulate guidelines to prohibit and penalize indiscriminate and non-rights-
respecting applications of AI and safeguard the health, safety, security, environmental,
and quality standards for the development, application, and use of AI technologies;
(i) Promote the responsible development, application, and use of AI;
(j) Provide timely and comprehensive information to the public in addressing
emerging issues on AI;
(k) Build AI ecosystem conscience by strengthening intellectual property and data
protection measures;


(1) In consultation with the affected sectors, establish an AI risk reduction plan;
(m) Together with the Commission on Higher Education (CHED), Department of
Education (DepEd). Technical Education and Skills Development Authority (TESDA)
and other education stakeholders, take the appropriate steps to revitalize the teaching of
humanities in state universities and colleges (SUCs), private higher education institutions
(HEIs), technical vocational institutions, and all elementary and secondary education
institutions, including alternative learning systems, both public and private;
(n) Provide effective measures to counter harmful AIs;
(o) Provide programmatic direction in the deployment of AI in government
agencies' programs and projects;
(p) Ensure an efficient balance in the regulation of AI and consumer protection to
facilitate the growth of emerging business models brought about by AI utilizing
regulatory sandbox approach to reduce the cost of innovation and barriers to entry,
including the collection of data and information regarding appropriate regulatory action;
(q) Device appropriate mechanisms to protect workers and professionals from
potential job losses brought about by automation and AI;
(r) Guided by the legal mandates of the agencies and LGUs concerned, identify
and task government agencies and LGUs that will be tasked to implement specific
functions to implement the provisions of this Act;
(s) Recommend to the President of the Philippines and the Congress all policy
matters regarding AI;
(t) Submit to the President of the Philippines, the President of the Senate and the
Speaker of
the
House
of
Representatives,
annual
and
special
reports
on the
implementation of this Act, and
(u) Exercise all powers and functions necessary for the objectives and purposes of
this Act.
SEC. 8. Secretariat to the Council. – The Philippine Council for Industry, Energy
and Emerging Technology Research and Development (PCIEERD) under the DOST shall
provide Secretariat support to the Council.


The initial staffing structure and complement of the Secretariat shall be submitted
by the DOST to the Department of Budget and Management (DBM) for funding. Pending
the creation of the appropriate plantilla positions, the DOST shall constitute an interim
Secretariat within one (1) month from the effectivity of this Act, through the temporary
detail of its personnel.
CHAPTER V
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE BOARD
SEC. 9. Artificial Intelligence Board. – To carry out the provisions of this Act, an
agency shall be created to be called the Artificial Intelligence Board (AIB) and shall be
composed of the Secretary of the DICT as Chairperson, the Secretary of the DOST as Co-
Chairperson, the Secretary of the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI), the Director
General of the Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines (IPOPHIL), the
Commissioner of the National Privacy Commission (NPC), and the National Intelligence
Coordinating Agency (NICA), as members.
The AIB shall act unanimously in the discharge of its functions as defined
hereunder:
(a) to exercise regulatory and supervisory authority over the development,
application, and use of AI systems;
(b) to investigate motu proprio or upon report of any person, impose and collect
fines and penalties, initiate and resolve the necessary administrative action, or initiate the
necessary criminal case against the responsible persons for any violation of this Act;
(c) to issue subpoena and subpoena duces tecum in relation to its investigation
provided that the subpoena shall state the nature and purpose of the investigation, shall be
directed to the person whose attendance is required, and in the case of a subpoena duces
tecum, it shall contain a reasonable description of books, documents, or things demanded
which must be relevant to the investigation;
(d) to exercise visitorial powers by itself or in coordination with other competent
agencies of the government to ensure the effective implementation of this Act, which
shall include the power to scrutinize the records of AI companies and laboratories, except


trade secrets and proprietary information, and to inspect their premises. Provided. That
trade secrets and proprietary information shall be defined in this Act's implementing rules
and regulations;
(e) to appoint automation auditors with the power to probe and review the
behavior of the algorithm;
(f) to require AI companies and laboratories to submit written or electronic forms
or reports as it may deem necessary and reasonable;
(g) to create, maintain, and regularly update a central database of AI companies
and laboratories;
(h) to conduct a nationwide information campaign with the Philippine Information
Agency (PIA) that shall inform the public on the responsible development, application,
and use of AI systems to enhance awareness among end-consumers;
(i) to enlist the assistance of any branch, department, bureau, office, agency or
instrumentality of the government, including government-owned and -controlled
corporations, in undertaking any and all operations, which may include the use of its
personnel, facilities and resources for the more resolute prevention, detection and
investigation of offenses and prosecution of offenders; and
(i) to implement such measures as may be necessary and justified under this Act;
SEC. 10. Creation of a Secretariat. – The AIB is hereby authorized to establish a
secretariat to be headed by an Executive Director who shall be appointed by the Council
for a term of five (5) years. He or she must be a member of the Philippine Bar, at least
thirty-five (35) years of age and of good moral character, unquestionable integrity and
known probity. All members of the Secretariat must have served for at least five (5) years
in any of the member agencies and shall hold full-time permanent positions within the
said agencies.
CHAPTER VI
NATIONAL CENTER FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE RESEARCH


SEC. 11. Establishment of the National Center for Artificial Intelligence
Research. – There is hereby established a National Center for Artificial Intelligence
Research (NCAIR), which shall be attached to the DICT for policy and program
coordination and shall be headed by a Board composed of the following members:
(a) The Secretary of the DICT, who shall act as the Chairperson;
(b) The Secretary of the DOST as co-chairperson;
(c) One (1) representative from the DTI;
(b) One (1) representative from the Department of Labor and Employment
(DOLE);
(c) One (1) representative each from the Department of Education (DepEd) and
the Commission on Higher Education (CHED);
(d) One (1) representative from the Department of Health (DOH);
(e) One (1) representative from the NICA;
(e) One (1) representative from the Department of Computer Science, University
of the Philippines-Diliman;
(f) Three (3) members representing professional or industrial artificial intelligence
or information communications technology (ICT) organizations to be selected by the
chairperson from among the list of nominees submitted by Philippines-based ICT
professional organizations; and
(g)
Three
(3)
members
representing
non-governmental
ICT
or
artificial
intelligence advocacy organizations to be selected by the chairperson from among the list
of nominees submitted by the country's non-governmental ICT organizations.
The Board may avail itself of the expertise and services of local or international
resource persons who are of known expertise, knowledge, and/or skill during deliberative
sessions.
The Board and its resource persons shall be entitled to such reasonable per diems,
allowances, and honoraria as may be allowed under existing laws, rules, and regulations.
SEC. 12. Functions of the NCAIR. – The NCAIR shall be the primary policy-
making and research body concerned with the development of artificial intelligence and
allied emergent technologies in the country. It shall focus on studying, harnessing,
advancing and/or transferring any beneficial Al creations or systems for the upliftment of


Filipino innovators, workers, industries, businesses, and consumers. It shall also promote
the education, training, and skills-development of Filipinos in this area for employment
and professional advancement.
The NCAIR shall aim to capacitate enterprises to produce new products,
processes, and services using Al The NCAIR shall endeavor for Al to benefit every kind
of industry to help minimize waste and spoilage, anticipate operational requirements by
the use of predictive technology, enhance business decision-making through advanced
analytics, and any other similar goal the Center may determine consistent with the
declared policies of this Act and the provisions of Chapter IV.
SEC. 13. Personnel. – The personnel of the NCAIR shall be primarily staffed by
Filipino scientists. The composition and size of such personnel shall be determined by the
chairperson, who may create such offices, divisions, and units under the NCAIR as he
may deem necessary, and for this purpose, the chairperson is authorized to adopt and
implement the corresponding staffing patterns; Provided, however, that the positions,
titles, and salaries of its officials and personnel shall be in accordance with the position
classifications and salary grades in the Civil Service Rules and the Salary Standardization
Act.
CHAPTER VII
INNOVATION AGENDA
SEC. 14. Role of the National Innovation Council. – The National Innovation
Council (NIC) created under Republic Act No. 11293, otherwise known as the
"Philippine Innovation Act", shall give priority to the development of artificial
intelligence in the National Innovation Agenda and Strategy Development. The NIC shall
incorporate in its overall vision the strategies and objectives outlined in Chapter VIII.
SEC. 15. Government-Industry-Academe Synergy. – To promote synergy among
the government, the private sector, and the academe, the Secretary of Science and
Technology, Director General of the National Economic and Development Authority.


Secretary of Information and Communications Technology, Secretary of Trade and
Industry, Secretary of Labor and Employment, Chairperson of the CHED, Secretary of
Education, and the Executive Members of the National Innovation Council shall form an
Artificial Intelligence sub-group under the NIC.
CHAPTER VIII
NATIONAL ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE STRATEGY
SEC. 16. Research and Development. – The State shall endeavor to accelerate
innovation with AI as well as master and push its boundaries; it shall help industries
innovate, nurture and support AI startups, and transform institutions by:
(a) Developing competency in AI research as measured by publications, patents,
and technology disclosures;
(b) Inviting international experts that can bring in new AI technologies and/or AI
startup or business ideas;
(c) Providing funding for AI algorithmic innovations
(d) Strengthening academe-industry partnerships in AI research and development,
(e) Incentivizing Higher Educational Institutions to promote AI research and
development internships with local private institutions;
(f) Creating quantifiable measures to track, coordinate, and improve government
services and policies for industries;
(g) Strengthening technology transfer between Higher Educational Institutions or
Research and Development Institutions with industry;
(h) Identifying and prioritizing sector-specific research and development projects
that can maximize the impact of AI research;
(i) Tracking and analyzing the quality and quantity of jobs displaced, created,
and/or transformed as a result of AI academe-industry partnerships;
(j) Identifying and supporting local AI startups;
(k) Developing state-owned venture funds to support AI startups;
(1) Incentivizing and encouraging investors to support promising AI businesses;
and


(m) Supporting or co-hosting AI-themed competitions, events, and conventions.
SEC. 17. Digitization and Infrastructure. – The State shall improve data access
and data value extraction, and build a robust networked environment by:
(a) Making internet accessible and affordable;
(b) Improving internet quality;
(c) Ensuring that the internet access of enterprises is reliable, secure, and at least
within global averages;
(d) Ensuring government agencies and other public institutions serve as reliable
areas for information access and transfer,
(e) Ensuring that Higher Educational Institutions and Research and Development
Institutions have access to reliable and secure networks;
(f) Making public data open, freely available, and downloadable in digestible
formats for ready analysis;
(g) Building a National Data Center (NDC) with a reliable and robust
infrastructure and data management system;
(h) Encouraging government agencies, research institutions, and top universities,
to maintain their own data centers linked with the NDC;
(i) Working with private institutions to link public and private datasets that will
allow for integrated data search;
(j) Promoting and encouraging data analysis across all functions of businesses,
industries, and government agencies;
(k) Promoting projects that would enable access to more sensitive datasets given
clear social or business value; and
(1) Undertaking extensive and up-to-date training of analysts and data scientists to
extract actionable insights from publicly available data.
SEC. 18. Workforce Development. – The State shall transform education and
nurture future Al talents as well as upskill or reskill workers by:
(a) Promoting data literacy for all;
(b) Ensuring the proper training of teachers in Data Science and Analytics:


(c) Developing graduate programs centered on data science and Al;
(d) Increasing the number of graduate students in data science, Al, and business
analytics;
(e) Promoting lifelong learning and design learning pathways for out-of-school
individuals;
(f) Incorporating data science and analytics, including data visualization and
storytelling, as general education courses in universities and colleges;
(g) Working with technology companies to provide sufficient computing
resources and equipment to students and teachers;
(h) Incentivizing industries to offer learning and development programs that
improve digital/data literacy:
(i) Developing sector-specific curricula and/or stackable programs with varying
degrees of specialization (low, medium, high);
(j) Identifying industry-specific tools needed to help upskill the country's
workforce;
(k) Incentivizing industries to send employees for graduate studies that focus on
research and development towards developing a scientific culture within organizations;
and
(1) Identifying jobs that are vulnerable to automation and other industry
technologies and map the skills that need upgrading or retooling.
SEC. 19. AI Governance Policies. – Employers may adopt AI software that they
may deem useful and/or beneficial in the workplace as an administrative tool or an
integrated or complementary part to process workflows, Provided, that the use of AI
in operations is regulated through the creation of an AI Governance Policy to provide
employees with guidelines for AI adoption and usage in the workplace, how the collection,
use and storage of data are compliant to the Data Privacy Act of 2012, and other
important information relating thereto.
Such AI Governance Policy may allow employees to use AI in business
processes and workflows, subject to limitations made known to the employees through said
policy. Employees are enjoined to consult their policy in the event of uncertainty as to a


specific application and use of AI and on the propriety of use thereof.
Employers shall ensure the use of AI software in a legally compliant manner.
They shall see to it that AI Governance Policies are periodically updated to comply
with existing laws and policies.
SEC. 20. Job Displacement Program. – In case a public or private employee is
terminated due to the installation or implementation of artificial intelligence technologies
or systems, rendering his or her position redundant, the worker affected shall be entitled
to separation pay equivalent to at least his or her one (1) month pay or to at least one (1)
month pay for every year of service, whichever is higher. A fraction of at least six (6)
months shall be considered one (1) whole year. This is without prejudice to any higher
benefit as may be provided by any existing law, rule, agreement, practice, or regulation.
The worker shall also be eligible for any unemployment benefits from the Social
Security System or the Government Service Insurance System.
The DOLE shall create a Job Displacement Program that will aim to immediately
assist and re-employ any workers involuntarily terminated due to the installation or
implementation of artificial intelligence technologies or systems. The NCAIR shall
always strive to improve the skills, education, and knowledge of employees in sectors
that are prone to Al replacement to protect them from any prolonged displacement.
CHAPTER IX
ROLE OF GOVERNMENT AGENCIES
SEC. 21. Whole of Government Approach. – In order to effectively regulate
and/or mitigate the risks and harness the potentials of AI across all areas of government
policy-spanning health, infrastructure, education, training, energy, communication,
industry, science and technology, defense, among others a "whole of government
approach" shall be adopted. This approach shall facilitate engagement with business, the
research development and extension (RD&E) sector, and the broader community towards
ensuring the full and effective implementation of this Act.


The DOST, DICT, DTI, Department of Agriculture, Department of Environment
and Natural Resources, DOH, Department of Energy, Department of Transportation,
Department of National Defense, Department of the Interior and Local Government,
DepEd, CHED, TESDA, DOLE, Commission on Human Rights, Department of Justice,
shall be responsible for implementing the country's policies on Al and, as such, shall
observe the "whole of government approach".
Government agencies shall make available for public access, a joint web portal,
that will bear information pertinent to Al regulations.
Government agencies shall submit periodic reports to the Council on their
respective implementation of this Act. Reporting guidelines shall be prepared by the
Council for this purpose.
CHAPTER X
MONITORING AND ENFORCEMENT MECHANISMS
SEC 22. Reports and Disclosures to the AIB. – In requiring AI companies and
laboratories to submit written or electronic forms or reports pursuant to Section 8 of this
Act, the AIB shall be prohibited from sharing, disclosing, or making available to the
public and other Al entity any information, document, plan, and report constituting trade
secrets, proprietary data, and other legitimate commercial information which are
confidential or privileged in nature.
SEC. 23. Central Database of AI Industry. – The central database, which shall be
open to the public, created by the AIB pursuant to Section 8 of this Act shall be updated
on a monthly basis. It shall include the following information:
(a) Corporate, business, or trade name of the AI industry participant,
(b) Registered trademark or trade name or logo of Al company or laboratory:
(c) Violations committed and incidents relating to such violations; and
(d) Other relevant information as may be determined by the Council: Provided,


That it shall not include trade secrets and other proprietary information as may be
determined in this Act's implementing rules and regulations.
For this purpose, the AIB shall coordinate with the Intellectual Property Office of
the Philippines (IPOPHL) for the accurate reporting of trademarks and tradenames of AI
companies or laboratories.
SEC. 24. Prohibited Use of AI System. – It shall be unlawful for any person to use
AI system that shall cause unnecessary, unjustifiable and indiscriminate moral or
pecuniary damage to individuals. The use of lethal autonomous weapon systems (LAWS)
is hereby prohibited.
The development, application, and use of AI to manipulate, exploit or control any
person beyond his or her consciousness to materially distort his or her behavior in a
manner that is likely to cause him or her or another person physical or psychological
harm is prohibited.
AI based social scoring of natural persons and practices that undermine privacy
rights shall also be prohibited.
SEC. 25. Penalties. – Any person who willfully or knowingly does or who shall
aid, permit, or cause to be done any of the acts declared to be unlawful in the preceding
section, or aids, permits, or causes such violation shall, upon conviction thereof, be
punished by imprisonment for not less than six months or more than six years and with
the accessory penalty of perpetual absolute disqualification from public office if the
offender be a public official at the time of the commission of the offense, and, if the
offender is an alien he shall be subject to deportation proceedings.
SEC. 26. Violations by Juridical Entities. – If the violation is committed by a
corporation,
partnership,
association,
or
other
juridical
entity,
the
penalty
of
imprisonment shall be imposed on the responsible directors or officers thereof, and the
lack of corporate personality cannot be raised as a defense in case the juridical entity is
unregistered.


CHAPTER XI
FINAL PROVISIONS
SEC. 27. Appropriations. – The amounts necessary for the implementation of this
Act shall be included in the annual General Appropriations Act.
SEC. 28. Implementing Rules and Regulations. – The DOST, shall, in
consultation with the concerned government agencies and stakeholders, promulgate the
implementing rules and regulations of this Act within ninety (90) days from its effectivity.
All guidelines, regulations, and other issuances mandated to be promulgated in this Act
shall be issued within sixty (60) days from the promulgation of this Act's implementing
rules and regulations.
SEC. 29. Construction and Interpretation. – Any doubt in the interpretation of
any provision in this Act shall be interpreted in favor of the interest of the general public.
SEC. 30. Separability Clause. – If, for any reason, any chapter, section, or
provision of this Act shall be declared unconstitutional, illegal, or invalid, such parts not
affected thereby shall remain in full force and effect.
SEC. 31. Repealing Clause. – All laws, decrees, executive orders, proclamations,
and administrative regulations, or parts thereof inconsistent herewith are hereby repealed
or modified accordingly.
SEC. 32. Effectivity. – This Act shall take effect fifteen (15) days after its
publication in the Official Gazette or in any newspaper of general circulation.
Approved,