FOURTEENTH CONGRESS OF THE REPUBLIC) 
OF THE PHILIPPINES 
1 
First Regular Session 
) 
Introduced by Senator Miriam Defensor Santiago 
EXPLANATORY NOTE 
The law on infidelity in the custody of prisoners is of 1930s vintage. The penalties 
considered harsh and cruel during those days are probably too tame in today's milieu where 
crimes of unparalleled cruelty have become a daily occurrence. At the same time, the escape of 
prisoners or the flight of criminals who are virtually captured has very often scandalized society. 
The government official or employee who has charge of a prisoner more often commit such 
infidelity in the custody because the penalty for such a dastardly act is light, and therefore, the 
lure to illegally free a prisoner through bribery is very great if not too tempting. One who frees a 
prisoner is part of the commission of the offense perpetrated by the prisoner. A guard who frees 
an inmate not only participates post litem to the cornmission of the crimes of the offender but 
turned traitor to the government and the laws he is sworn to protectand respect. 
In the Penal Code the penalty for the crime of freeing a convicted prisoners by their 
guardkeepers is prision correccionul in its medium to its maximum period, therefore, the 
penalty begins at two (2) years and one day to six (6) years. However for the crime of infidelity 
in the custody of prisoners who are merely in detention, the penalty isprision correccional in its 
minimum period, which is six (6) months and one day to two (2) years. The emphasis of the 
imposition of the penalty is based on whether the prisoner is convicted or merely in detention. To 
us, this categorization is not proper and is insufficient because it is not based on the gravity of 
the offense of the prisoner. True, the accused is deemed innocent until he is convicted. But today, 
there are occurrence of crimes that are so odious and atrocious that it despoils the human being 
and violate the sensibilities of man. 
The commission of crimes that are heinous, like murder, the massacre or the 
extermination of a family, terrorism, genocide by the use of weapon of mass destruction like 


dynamite and explosion have become nightmares which threaten the stability of the government. 
Yet every now and then we are scandalized by the rampant escape of those accused of terrorism, 
economic sabotage, massacre and similar terrible felonies from their high security incarceration 
while the oficials and the personnel in charge of the detainee literally go scot-free because the 
highest penalty they can be meted out is two years imprisonment. Society must therefore act 
through the law-making body of the government. The imposition of a steeper penalty is but a 
defense of society against government officials and employees who desecrate their duty as care 
takers of detention prisoners. It is not only valid but logical as dictated by necessity that the 
penalty of the crime of infidelity of a custodian be made in proportion to the gravity of the 
crimes of the illegally freed offender. 
This is a Senate counterpart bill to one filed in the House of Representatives by Rep. 
Salacnib F. Baterina. 


FOURTEENTH CONGRESS OF THE REPUsLIC) 
OF THE PHILIPPINES 
) 
First Regular Session 
1 
SENATE 
S.No. 
Introduced by Senator Miriam Defensor Santiago 
1 
AN ACT 
2 
3 
4 
5 
DEFINING THE CRIME OF BETRAYAL OF DUTY IN THE CUSTODY OF PRISONERS 
PROVIDING FOR ADDITIONAL RULES ON THE IMPRISONMENT, DETENTION, 
CONFINEMENT AND CUSTODY OF PRISONERS AND DETAINEES, SPECIFYING 
ADDITIONAL WORK AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF GOVERNMENT PERSONNEL 
6 
7 
8 
9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
CHARGED WITH THE CUSTODY OF SUCH PRISONERS AND 
STATING THE PENALTIES THEREFOR 
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the Philippines in Congress 
assembled: 
SECTION 1. Any provision of law to the contrary not withstanding, the crime of betrayal 
of duty in the custody of prisoners and detained persons is hereby defined as on act or series of 
acts whereby a person or persons charged with the custody of prisoners, detained persons under 
preventive imprisonment, persons arrested in the act of committing a crime, persons who are 
wonted in foreign countries by which the Philippines has a treaty of reciprocity for extradition, 
persons who committed heinous crimes, terrorist and war criminals or one engaged in economic 
sabotage, shall allow without legal justification the escape of such prisoner or persons similarly 
situated shell be punished with a penalty which is one (1) degree lower than the penalty imposed 
for the offense which the detainee is charged wit or convicted of; Provided that in no case shall 
the penalty imposed be lower than prision correccional in its minimum period; Provided further 
that for the scope of a detainee wanted by a foreign country, the penalty ofprision correccional 
in its maximum period shall be meted out; Provided further that for the escape of the prisoners 
who are accused of the commission of heinous, terrorism, war crimes and economic sabotage, 
the penalty of life imprisonment shall be imposed without any provision for parole; and Provided 
finally that the persons convicted of the crime of betrayal of duty In the custody of prisoners 
shall likewise suffer special permanent disqualification if the detainee shall have been convicted 
or who has admitted his guilt in open court, even if the decision of conviction has not been 
rendered. 
1 


9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
SECTION 2. In addition to the requirement considered necessary in the custody of 
prisoners imposed by present rules and regulations, the office or institution for high risk 
detainees, shall establish or add to existing rules, a record of the time the detained person was 
accepted by the institution, name of the persons guarding the detainee, the time and date there 
were turned over to guards, properly signed and acknowledged by said personnel guarding the 
detainee, the movement of the detainee from and to his room or cell of detention, his transfer 
from one institution or detention to another and such record shall at all time be properly signed 
and acknowledged in the said records by the person or persons in custody. 
SECTION 3. Person, though not in charge of the detainee, who enjoys a higher rank than 
the custodian of the prisoner who shall cause, aid, abet and facilitate the escape of a detainee, 
shall suffer the same penalty as the persons who are in custody of the prisoner but that in 
imposing the penalty, the court or tribunal shall impose the same in its maximum period where 
the same is divisible; Provided, however, that the court shall, in every case, impose penalties 
under this Act in the degree that will be fair and humane as the case may be. 
SECTION 4. This Act shall take effect fifteen (15) days after its publication in at least 
two (2) newspapers of general circulation. 
Approved, 
2