There was strong evidence that duration away from work from both MSK or pain-related conditions and MH conditions were significantly reduced by multi-domain interventions encompassing at least two of the three domains .
There was moderate evidence that these multi-domain interventions had a positive impact on cost outcomes .
There was strong evidence that cognitive behavioural therapy interventions that do not also include workplace modifications or service coordination components are not effective in helping workers with MH conditions in RTW .
Evidence for the effectiveness of other single-domain interventions was mixed , with some studies reporting positive effects and others reporting no effects on lost time and work functioning .
Purpose The objective of this systematic review was to synthesize evidence on the effectiveness of workplace-based return-to-work ( RTW ) interventions and work disability management ( DM ) interventions that assist workers with musculoskeletal ( MSK ) and pain-related conditions and mental health ( MH ) conditions with RTW .
Graded Activity for Low Back Pain in Occupational Health Care
Context Low back pain causes frequent disability and lost productive time . Contribution This r and omized trial compared a behavioral-oriented grade d activity program with usual care in 134 Dutch airline company workers who had missed work because of persistent low back pain .  Grade d activity consisted of biweekly 1-hour exercise sessions with physiotherapists who emphasized operant-conditioning principles . Over 6 months of follow-up , participants in the grade d activity program missed 58 days of work , while participants receiving usual care missed 87 days . Implication s A behavioral-oriented grade d activity program returned participants with low back pain to work more often than did usual care . The Editors Nonspecific low back pain is an uncomfortable medical condition that causes frequent disability and absence from work . Most episodes of low back pain resolve fairly quickly and cause only short periods of absence from work . However , some workers with low back pain miss work for several days to weeks and are at risk for more permanent disability ( 1 ) . To reduce the individual and socioeconomic burden related to this absenteeism , we need effective intervention strategies in occupational health care setting s that promote safe and rapid return to work . One promising and often-advocated intervention strategy for workers with prolonged nonspecific low back pain is active rehabilitation that is directed toward return to normal activity and work ( 2 ) . Examples are grade d activity interventions that include physical exercise , application of operant-conditioning behavioral principals , and promotion of improved functioning and safe return to work even if pain persists ( 3 - 6 ) . In a r and omized , controlled trial , Lindstrm and colleagues ( 3 , 4 ) found that a grade d activity intervention reduced absence from work more than did traditional care in Swedish workers employed in the automobile industry . We investigate , in a second r and omized , controlled trial , whether absence from work because of low back pain is reduced more with grade d activity intervention than with traditional care in an occupational health care setting in the Netherl and s. Methods Study Design and Sample The study was a single-blind , r and omized , controlled trial in an occupational health services center ( KLM Health , Safety and Environment ) at Schiphol Airport , Amsterdam , the Netherl and s. The center provides occupational health services for all employees of a major Dutch airline ( KLM Royal Dutch Airlines ) . The source sample ( n = 20 000 ) consisted of workers who were employed in the following organizational units of the airline : baggage and aircraft turnaround services , passenger services , engineering and maintenance , cargo , and cabin and cockpit . Workers who were listed as absent from work because of low back pain were invited for a consultation with the occupational physician . Those who were thought to be eligible for inclusion were referred to the research assistant , who judged whether they met the inclusion criteria : full or partial absence from work because of nonspecific low back pain and low back pain symptoms with a minimum duration of 4 weeks in succession . The exclusion criteria were low back pain with radiation below the knee with signs of nerve-root compression ( 7 ) ; cardiovascular contraindications for physical activity , as checked according to the Physical Activities Readiness Question naire ( 8 , 9 ) ; any conflict between worker and employer with legal involvement ; or pregnancy . Workers who met the inclusion criteria were informed of the purpose and procedures of the study and were enrolled after giving informed consent . The Medical Ethical Committee of the VU University Medical Center , Amsterdam , the Netherl and s , approved the study . Treatment Allocation The participants were assigned to grade d activity or usual care on the basis of block r and omization , after prestratification for the organizational unit in the workplace from which they were recruited ( the 5 organizational units listed earlier ) and for the severity of pain symptoms ( scored on a scale of 0 to 10 ; severity scores were < 6 or 6 points ) . This result ed in a total of 10 strata . R and omized , permuted blocks of 4 allocations were generated for each stratum through a computer-generated r and om-sequence table . Opaque , sequentially numbered , sealed envelopes were prepared for each stratum by a research er who was not involved in enrolling the participants or assigning them to their groups . The envelopes contained a sheet of paper that indicated 1 of the 2 interventions . Participants learned their group assignments after a research assistant completed the baseline measurements and delivered the sealed envelopes . Blinding The research assistants who collected the data were blinded to the treatment allocation . All participants were repeatedly asked not to reveal any information about their treatment allocation . The participants and treatment providers were not blinded to treatment allocation . Interventions In the Dutch occupational health care system , occupational physicians guide disabled workers who are absent from work through their disability period . These occupational physicians are employed by occupational health services that are paid for by the companies . The occupational physicians adhere to back pain management strategies that consist of advising workers on ergonomics , prevention , and return-to-work schedules and advising and communicating with other stakeholders ( such as health care providers and representatives of the workplace ) . Disabled workers who participated in the present study were assigned to either grade d activity or usual care within the context of the Dutch occupational health care setting . Grade d Activity The intervention group received the usual guidance from the occupational physician about work-related problems and barriers to return to work as well as the grade d activity intervention supervised by a physiotherapist .  Three physiotherapists who worked in a private practice at Schiphol Airport provided the treatment according to the grade d activity protocol . Two of those physiotherapists were also trained as manual therapists , and 1 was also a human movement scientist . Before the study , the physiotherapists had been specifically trained to treat patients with low back pain according to behavioral principles . A research physiotherapist who was experienced in treating patients with chronic pain in rehabilitation centers instructed the physiotherapists in three 2-hour sessions and practice d patienttherapist interactions with them through role-play . Before the study , the physiotherapists treated several patients according to the grade d activity protocol to gain more experience . The physiotherapists made audiotapes of the intervention sessions before and during the study period . The contents of these audiotapes were assessed and discussed with the research physiotherapist in 3 additional meetings . Furthermore , the physiotherapists summarized the treatment after each session , and research ers used these summaries to review the sessions . The same physiotherapist treated participants each time , except for temporary st and -in sessions that were supervised by colleagues because of holidays or other reasons . Specific therapists were not systematic ally selected to treat specific participants ; selection was based on pragmatic reasons , such as the time available in the work schedules of the physiotherapists or the days of treatment preferred by the participants . Table 1 presents the concept and content of the grade d activity intervention . The intervention consisted of 1-hour exercise sessions that participants attended twice per week until they returned completely to regular work or until the maximum therapy duration of 3 months was reached . At the start of the intervention , the physiotherapist inquired about the participant 's medical history and completed a brief physical examination consisting of flexion , extension , and lateroflexion of the lumbar spine and a brief screening for nerve-root pain ( 10 ) . The purpose of the physical examination was to confirm the diagnosis of benign , nonspecific low back pain and to reduce participants ' fears about any presumed underlying disease . The participants were reassured that despite the annoying pain , nothing was seriously wrong with their backs . Subsequently , the physiotherapist and participant decided on a set of general exercises and individually tailored exercises . Both types of exercises had to be performed during each session . The general exercises were aerobic exercises , such as cycling or rowing , and strengthening exercises for large muscle groups , and most were carried out in a gym while using exercise equipment . The strengthening exercises were a floor abdominal sit-up exercise , a dynamic back extension exercise , a leg-press exercise , a latissimus pull-down exercise , and st and ing up from a low chair .  Participants in the grade d activity group had to perform not only these general exercises but also individually tailored exercises , which imitated physical tasks at work or difficult and painful activities of daily living . For example , a participant who reported back problems while lifting and moving suitcases from a luggage wagon into an airplane might be given an exercise to practice lifting and moving a suitcase with a certain number of repetitions . During the first 3 sessions , the maximal performance ( for example , the maximum number of repetitions ) was assessed for each exercise separately , and the average score for each exercise over the 3 sessions was used as a baseline value for specifying a gradually progressive exercise scheme . Subsequently , the participant was asked to propose a date for full return to regular work , which would consequently be the end point of the physical exercise program . Before returning to full regular work , participants could return to work with modified hours and duties . Advised by the physiotherapist , the participant
There was strong evidence that duration away from work from both MSK or pain-related conditions and MH conditions were significantly reduced by multi-domain interventions encompassing at least two of the three domains .
There was moderate evidence that these multi-domain interventions had a positive impact on cost outcomes .
There was strong evidence that cognitive behavioural therapy interventions that do not also include workplace modifications or service coordination components are not effective in helping workers with MH conditions in RTW .
Evidence for the effectiveness of other single-domain interventions was mixed , with some studies reporting positive effects and others reporting no effects on lost time and work functioning .
Purpose The objective of this systematic review was to synthesize evidence on the effectiveness of workplace-based return-to-work ( RTW ) interventions and work disability management ( DM ) interventions that assist workers with musculoskeletal ( MSK ) and pain-related conditions and mental health ( MH ) conditions with RTW .