None of the ergonomic interventions was more beneficial for any outcome measures when compared with another treatment or with no treatment or with placebo .
Behavioural interventions had inconsistent effects on pain and disability , with some subgroups showing benefit and others showing no significant improvement when compared with no treatment , minor intervention controls or other behavioural interventions .In the eight studies that evaluated various other interventions , there was no evidence of a clear beneficial effect of any of the interventions provided .
We found very low- quality evidence indicating that pain , recovery , disability and sick leave are similar after exercises when compared with no treatment , with minor intervention controls or with exercises provided as additional treatment to people with work-related complaints of the arm , neck or shoulder .
Low- quality evidence also showed that ergonomic interventions did not decrease pain at short-term follow-up but did decrease pain at long-term follow-up .
There was no evidence of an effect on other outcomes .
For behavioural and other interventions , there was no evidence of a consistent effect on any of the outcomes .
BACKGROUND Work-related upper limb disorder ( WRULD ) , repetitive strain injury ( RSI ) , occupational overuse syndrome ( OOS ) and work-related complaints of the arm , neck or shoulder ( CANS ) are the most frequently used umbrella terms for disorders that develop as a result of repetitive movements , awkward postures and impact of external forces such as those associated with operating vibrating tools .
Work-related CANS , which is the term we use in this review , severely hampers the working population .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of conservative interventions for work-related complaints of the arm , neck or shoulder ( CANS ) in adults on pain , function and work-related outcomes .
Comparison of supervised exercise with and without manual physical therapy for patients with shoulder impingement syndrome.
STUDY DESIGN A prospect i ve r and omized clinical trial . OBJECTIVE To compare the effectiveness of 2 physical therapy treatment approaches for impingement syndrome of the shoulder . BACKGROUND Manual physical therapy combined with exercise is a commonly applied but currently unproven clinical treatment for impingement syndrome of the shoulder . METHODS AND MEASURES Thirty men and 22 women ( age 43 years + /- 9.1 ) diagnosed with shoulder impingement syndrome were r and omly assigned to 1 of 2 treatment groups . The exercise group performed supervised flexibility and strengthening exercises . The manual therapy group performed the same program and received manual physical therapy treatment . Both groups received the selected intervention 6 times over a 3-week period . The testers , who were blinded to group assignment , measured strength , pain , and function before treatment and after 6 physical therapy visits . Strength was a composite score of isometric strength tests for internal rotation , external rotation , and abduction . Pain was a composite score of visual analog scale measures during resisted break tests , active abduction , and functional activities . Function was measured with a functional assessment question naire . The visual analog scale used to measure pain with functional activities and the functional assessment question naire were also measured 2 months after the initiation of treatment . RESULTS Subjects in both groups experienced significant decreases in pain and increases in function , but there was significantly more improvement in the manual therapy group compared to the exercise group . For example , pain in the manual therapy group was reduced from a pretreatment mean ( + /- SD ) of 575.8 ( + /- 220.0 ) to a posttreatment mean of 174.4 ( + /- 183.1 ) . In contrast , pain in the exercise group was reduced from a pretreatment mean of 557.1 ( + /- 237.2 ) to a posttreatment mean of 360.6 ( + /- 272.3 ) . Strength in the manual therapy group improved significantly while strength in the exercise group did not . CONCLUSION Manual physical therapy applied by experienced physical therapists combined with supervised exercise in a brief clinical trial is better than exercise alone for increasing strength , decreasing pain , and improving function in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome
None of the ergonomic interventions was more beneficial for any outcome measures when compared with another treatment or with no treatment or with placebo .
Behavioural interventions had inconsistent effects on pain and disability , with some subgroups showing benefit and others showing no significant improvement when compared with no treatment , minor intervention controls or other behavioural interventions .In the eight studies that evaluated various other interventions , there was no evidence of a clear beneficial effect of any of the interventions provided .
We found very low- quality evidence indicating that pain , recovery , disability and sick leave are similar after exercises when compared with no treatment , with minor intervention controls or with exercises provided as additional treatment to people with work-related complaints of the arm , neck or shoulder .
Low- quality evidence also showed that ergonomic interventions did not decrease pain at short-term follow-up but did decrease pain at long-term follow-up .
There was no evidence of an effect on other outcomes .
For behavioural and other interventions , there was no evidence of a consistent effect on any of the outcomes .
BACKGROUND Work-related upper limb disorder ( WRULD ) , repetitive strain injury ( RSI ) , occupational overuse syndrome ( OOS ) and work-related complaints of the arm , neck or shoulder ( CANS ) are the most frequently used umbrella terms for disorders that develop as a result of repetitive movements , awkward postures and impact of external forces such as those associated with operating vibrating tools .
Work-related CANS , which is the term we use in this review , severely hampers the working population .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of conservative interventions for work-related complaints of the arm , neck or shoulder ( CANS ) in adults on pain , function and work-related outcomes .