We found inconsistent evidence that the use of an arm support or an alternative mouse may or may not reduce the incidence of neck or shoulder MSDs .
For other physical ergonomic interventions there is no evidence of an effect .
For organisational interventions , in the form of supplementary breaks , there is very low- quality evidence of an effect on upper limb discomfort .
For training and multifaceted interventions there is no evidence of an effect on upper limb pain or discomfort .
BACKGROUND Work-related upper limb and neck musculoskeletal disorders ( MSDs ) are one of the most common occupational disorders worldwide .
Studies have shown that the percentage of office workers that suffer from MSDs ranges from 20 to 60 per cent .
The direct and indirect costs of work-related upper limb MSDs have been reported to be high in Europe , Australia , and the United States .
Although ergonomic interventions are likely to reduce the risk of office workers developing work-related upper limb and neck MSDs , the evidence is unclear .
This is an up date of a Cochrane Review which was last published in 2012 .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of physical , cognitive and organisational ergonomic interventions , or combinations of those interventions for the prevention of work-related upper limb and neck MSDs among office workers .
A field study of supplementary rest breaks for data-entry operators
This study examined the effects of supplementary rest breaks on musculoskeletal discomfort , eyestrain , mood , and performance in data -entry workers . Two rest break schedules were compared in a within-subjects design . Workers alternated between a ‘ conventional ’ and a ‘ supplementary ’ schedule in 4-week intervals . The conventional schedule contained a 15-min break during the first half of the work shift and a 15-min break during the second half of the shift . The supplementary schedule contained the same two 15-min breaks , and a 5-min break during each hour which otherwise did not contain a break , for a total of 20 extra minutes of break time . Results are based on data from 42 workers . They indicated that discomfort in several areas of the body , and eyestrain , were significantly lower under the supplementary than under the conventional schedule . While symptoms increased from pre- to post-work periods under both schedules , the magnitude of the increases was significantly less under the supplementary schedule . In addition , increases in discomfort of the right forearm , wrist and h and over the course of the work week under the conventional schedule were eliminated under the supplementary schedule . These beneficial effects were obtained without reductions in data -entry performance
We found inconsistent evidence that the use of an arm support or an alternative mouse may or may not reduce the incidence of neck or shoulder MSDs .
For other physical ergonomic interventions there is no evidence of an effect .
For organisational interventions , in the form of supplementary breaks , there is very low- quality evidence of an effect on upper limb discomfort .
For training and multifaceted interventions there is no evidence of an effect on upper limb pain or discomfort .
BACKGROUND Work-related upper limb and neck musculoskeletal disorders ( MSDs ) are one of the most common occupational disorders worldwide .
Studies have shown that the percentage of office workers that suffer from MSDs ranges from 20 to 60 per cent .
The direct and indirect costs of work-related upper limb MSDs have been reported to be high in Europe , Australia , and the United States .
Although ergonomic interventions are likely to reduce the risk of office workers developing work-related upper limb and neck MSDs , the evidence is unclear .
This is an up date of a Cochrane Review which was last published in 2012 .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of physical , cognitive and organisational ergonomic interventions , or combinations of those interventions for the prevention of work-related upper limb and neck MSDs among office workers .