Compared with general anaesthesia , a central neuraxial block may reduce the zero to 30-day mortality for patients undergoing surgery with intermediate to high cardiac risk ( level of evidence , moderate ) .
BACKGROUND Various beneficial effects derived from neuraxial blocks have been reported .
However , it is unclear whether these effects have an influence on perioperative mortality and major pulmonary/cardiovascular complications .
OBJECTIVES Our primary objective was to summarize Cochrane systematic review s that assess the effects of neuraxial blockade on perioperative rates of death , chest infection and myocardial infa rct ion by integrating the evidence from all such review s that have compared neuraxial blockade with or without general anaesthesia versus general anaesthesia alone for different types of surgery in various population s. Our secondary objective was to summarize the evidence on adverse effects ( an adverse event for which a causal relation between the intervention and the event is at least a reasonable possibility ) of neuraxial blockade .
Perioperative Morbidity in Patients Randomized to Epidural or General Anesthesia for Lower Extremity Vascular Surgery
Background : Perioperative morbidity may be modifiable in high risk patients by the anesthesiologist 's choice of either regional or general anesthesia . This clinical trial compared outcomes between epidural ( EA ) and general ( GA ) anesthesia/analgesia regimens In a group of patients at high risk for cardiac and other morbidity who were undergoing similarly stressful surgical procedures . Methods : One hundred patients scheduled for elective vascular reconstruction of the lower extremities were r and omized to receive either EA for surgery followed by epidural analgesia , or GA for surgery followed by intravenous patient-controlled analgesia .  Hemodynamic monitoring , blood pressure , and heart rate limits were determined prior to r and omization . Management of anesthesia in the immediate postoperative period was st and ardized . The data collected included continuous electrocardiographic monitoring from the day before surgery through the third postoperative day , serial electrocardiograms , and cardiac enzymes . Cardiac ischemia , myocardial infa rct ion , unstable angina , and cardiac death were identified by a cardiologist blinded to the type of anesthesia received . Other major morbidity was determined at the time of hospital discharge and at 1 and 6 months after surgery . Results : Eleven patients who received GA required regrafting or an embolectomy during their hospital stay , compared with two patients who received EA . This association of GA with reoperation remained significant after adjustment for baseline differences . Cardiac outcomes were similar in the two groups with respect to perioperative death ( 1 EA and 1 GA ) , death within 6 months ( 4 EA and 3 GA ) , nonfatal myocardial infa rct ion within 7 days ( 2 EA and 2 GA ) , unstable angina ( 0 EA and 2 GA ) , and myocardial ischemia following r and omization ( 17 EA and 23 GA ) . Rates of major infections in the two groups ( 1 EA and 2 GA ) , renal failure ( 3 EA and 3 GA ) , and pulmonary complications ( 3 EA and 7 GA ) also were similar . Conclusions : Carefully conducted epidural and general anesthesia appear to be associated with comparable rates of cardiac and most other morbidity in patients undergoing lower extremity vascular surgery . However , compared with general anesthesia , epidural anesthesia is associated with a lower incidence of reoperatlon for inadequate tissue perfusion and , therefore , may be advantageous for this surgical population
Compared with general anaesthesia , a central neuraxial block may reduce the zero to 30-day mortality for patients undergoing surgery with intermediate to high cardiac risk ( level of evidence , moderate ) .
BACKGROUND Various beneficial effects derived from neuraxial blocks have been reported .
However , it is unclear whether these effects have an influence on perioperative mortality and major pulmonary/cardiovascular complications .
OBJECTIVES Our primary objective was to summarize Cochrane systematic review s that assess the effects of neuraxial blockade on perioperative rates of death , chest infection and myocardial infa rct ion by integrating the evidence from all such review s that have compared neuraxial blockade with or without general anaesthesia versus general anaesthesia alone for different types of surgery in various population s. Our secondary objective was to summarize the evidence on adverse effects ( an adverse event for which a causal relation between the intervention and the event is at least a reasonable possibility ) of neuraxial blockade .