D. Restoration of sinus rhythm for monophasic vs. biphasic waveforms .
Another study showed that PVI result ed in long-term restoration
Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is a major public health problem in the United States .
More than 2.3 million Americans are estimated to have AF ( 1 ) .
The known association between AF and substantial mortality , morbidity , and health care costs compounds the effect of this condition .
Not only is the risk for death in patients with AF twice that of patients without it , but AF can result in myocardial ischemia and infa rct ion , exacerbate heart failure ( HF ) , and cause tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy if the ventricular rate is not well-controlled ( 25 ) .
The most dreaded complication of AF is thromboembolism , especially stroke ( 6 ) .
In some patients , AF or therapies to manage this condition can severely depreciate quality of life ( 710 ) .
Furthermore , the management of AF and its complications is responsible for nearly $ 16 billion in additional costs to the U.S. health care system per year ( 11 ) .
We conducted this systematic review to evaluate the comparative safety and effectiveness of rate- versus rhythm-control strategies ;  medications used for ventricular rate control ; strict versus more lenient rate-control strategies ; nonpharmacologic rate-control therapies  versus medications ; electrical cardioversion and antiarrhythmic medications  for restoration of sinus rhythm ;  and  catheter ablation , surgical ablation , and antiarrhythmic medications  for maintenance of sinus rhythm .
Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Strategies for Paroxysmal Patients: Randomized Comparison Between Different Techniques
Background —Whether different ablation strategies affect paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ( AF ) long-term freedom from AF/atrial tachyarrhythmia is unclear . We sought to compare the effect of 3 different ablation approaches on the long-term success in patients with paroxysmal AF . Methods and Results —One hundred three consecutive patients with paroxysmal AF scheduled for ablation and presenting in the electrophysiology laboratory in AF were selected for this study . Patients were r and omized to pulmonary vein antrum isolation ( PVAI ; n=35 ) versus biatrial ablation of the complex fractionated atrial electrograms ( CFAEs ; n=34 ) versus PVAI followed by CFAEs ( n=34 ) . Patients were given event recorders and followed up at 3 , 6 , 9 , 12 , and 15 months postablation . There was no statistical significant difference between the groups in term of sex , age , AF duration , left atrial size , and ejection fraction . At 1 year follow-up , freedom from AF/atrial tachyarrhythmia was documented in 89 % of patients in the PVAI group , 91 % in the PVAI plus CFAEs group , and 23 % in the CFAEs group ( P<0.001 ) after a single procedure and with antiarrhythmic drugs . Conclusion —No difference in terms of success rate was seen between PVAI alone and PVAI associated with defragmentation . CFAEs ablation alone had the smallest impact on AF recurrences at 1-year follow-up . These results suggest that antral isolation is sufficient to treat most patients with paroxysmal AF
D. Restoration of sinus rhythm for monophasic vs. biphasic waveforms .
Another study showed that PVI result ed in long-term restoration
Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is a major public health problem in the United States .
More than 2.3 million Americans are estimated to have AF ( 1 ) .
The known association between AF and substantial mortality , morbidity , and health care costs compounds the effect of this condition .
Not only is the risk for death in patients with AF twice that of patients without it , but AF can result in myocardial ischemia and infa rct ion , exacerbate heart failure ( HF ) , and cause tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy if the ventricular rate is not well-controlled ( 25 ) .
The most dreaded complication of AF is thromboembolism , especially stroke ( 6 ) .
In some patients , AF or therapies to manage this condition can severely depreciate quality of life ( 710 ) .
Furthermore , the management of AF and its complications is responsible for nearly $ 16 billion in additional costs to the U.S. health care system per year ( 11 ) .
We conducted this systematic review to evaluate the comparative safety and effectiveness of rate- versus rhythm-control strategies ;  medications used for ventricular rate control ; strict versus more lenient rate-control strategies ; nonpharmacologic rate-control therapies  versus medications ; electrical cardioversion and antiarrhythmic medications  for restoration of sinus rhythm ;  and  catheter ablation , surgical ablation , and antiarrhythmic medications  for maintenance of sinus rhythm .