There was preliminary evidence from one trial that exercise to the non-injured arm during immobilisation might lead to short-term benefits on increasing grip strength and range of movement following distal radius fracture .
There is emerging evidence that current prescribed exercise regimens may not be effective in reducing impairments and improving activity following an upper limb fracture .
Starting exercise early combined with a shorter immobilisation period is more effective than starting exercise after a longer immobilisation period .
QUESTION What is the effect of exercise on increasing participation and activity levels and reducing impairment in the rehabilitation of people with upper limb fractures ?
Bruder AM , Shields N , Dodd KJ , Taylor NF ( 2017 ) Prescribed exercise programs may not be effective in reducing impairments and improving activity during upper limb fracture rehabilitation : a systematic review .
Minimal clinically important differences of 3 patient-rated outcomes instruments.
PURPOSE Patient-rated instruments are increasingly used to measure orthopedic outcomes . However , the clinical relevance of modest score changes on such instruments is often unclear . This study was design ed to define the minimal clinical ly important differences ( MCIDs ) of the Disabilities of the Arm , Shoulder , and H and ( DASH ) , QuickDASH ( subset of DASH ) , and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation ( PRWE ) question naires for atraumatic conditions of the h and , wrist , and forearm . METHODS We prospect ively analyzed 102 patients undergoing nonoperative treatment for isolated tendinitis , arthritis , or nerve compression syndromes from the forearm to the h and . By phone , patients completed the DASH , QuickDASH , and PRWE at enrollment and at 2 weeks ( n = 78 used in the analysis ) and 4 weeks ( n = 24 used in the analysis ) after initiating treatment . Patients reporting clinical improvement each contributed a single data point categorized as no change ( n = 41 ) , minimal improvement ( n = 30 ) , or marked improvement ( n = 31 ) via a vali date d anchor-based approach . We calculated the MCID as the mean change score for each outcome measure in the minimal improvement group . RESULTS The MCID ( 95 % confidence interval ) for the DASH was 10 ( 5 - 15 ) . The MCID for the QuickDASH was 14 ( 9 - 20 ) . The MCID was 14 ( 8 - 20 ) for the PRWE . The MCID values were significantly different from changes in these outcome measures at times of either no change or marked improvement . The MCID values positively correlated with baseline outcome measure scores to a greater degree than final outcome measure scores . CONCLUSIONS Longitudinal changes on the DASH of 10 points , on the QuickDASH of 14 points , and on the PRWE of 14 points represent minimal clinical ly important changes . We recommend application of these MCID values for group-level analysis when conducting research and interpreting data examining groups of patients as opposed to assessing individual patients . These MCID values may provide a basis for sample size calculations for future investigation using these common patient-rated outcome measures . TYPE OF STUDY /LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Diagnostic III
There was preliminary evidence from one trial that exercise to the non-injured arm during immobilisation might lead to short-term benefits on increasing grip strength and range of movement following distal radius fracture .
There is emerging evidence that current prescribed exercise regimens may not be effective in reducing impairments and improving activity following an upper limb fracture .
Starting exercise early combined with a shorter immobilisation period is more effective than starting exercise after a longer immobilisation period .
QUESTION What is the effect of exercise on increasing participation and activity levels and reducing impairment in the rehabilitation of people with upper limb fractures ?
Bruder AM , Shields N , Dodd KJ , Taylor NF ( 2017 ) Prescribed exercise programs may not be effective in reducing impairments and improving activity during upper limb fracture rehabilitation : a systematic review .