A significant positive effect of the interventions on weight was reported by all study types .
The meta- analysis showed that lifestyle interventions achieved weight and waist circumference reductions after one year .
However , no clear effects on biochemical or clinical parameters were observed , possibly due to short follow-up periods or lack of power of the studies meta-analysed .
Changes in dietary parameters or physical activity were generally not reported .
Most studies assessing feasibility were supportive of implementation of lifestyle interventions in routine clinical care .
Conclusion Lifestyle interventions for patients at high risk of diabetes , delivered by a variety of healthcare providers in routine clinical setting s , are feasible but appear to be of limited clinical benefit one year after intervention .
Despite convincing evidence from structured intensive trials , this systematic review showed that translation into routine practice has less effect on diabetes risk reduction
Background The clinical effectiveness of intensive lifestyle interventions in preventing or delaying diabetes in people at high risk has been established from r and omised trials of structured , intensive interventions conducted in several countries over the past two decades .
The challenge is to translate them into routine clinical setting s. The objective of this review is to determine whether lifestyle interventions delivered to high-risk adult patients in routine clinical care setting s are feasible and effective in achieving reductions in risk factors for diabetes .
The ProActive trial protocol – a randomised controlled trial of the efficacy of a family-based, domiciliary intervention programme to increase physical activity among individuals at high risk of diabetes [ISRCTN61323766]
Background Increasing prevalence of obesity and disorders associated with sedentary living constitute a major global public health problem . While previous evaluations of interventions to increase  physical activity  have involved communities or individuals with established disease , less attention has been given to interventions for individuals at risk of disease . Methods / design ProActive aims to evaluate the efficacy of a theoretical , evidence - and family-based intervention programme to increase physical activity  in a sedentary population , defined as being at-risk through having a parental family history of diabetes . Primary care diabetes or family history registers were used to recruit 365 individuals aged 30–50 years , screened for activity level . Participants were assigned by central r and omisation to three intervention programmes : brief written advice ( comparison group ) , or a psychologically based behavioural change programme , delivered either by telephone ( distance group ) or face-to-face in the family home over one year . The protocol -driven intervention programme is delivered by trained facilitators , and aims to support increases in physical activity through the introduction and facilitation of a range of self-regulatory skills ( e.g. goal setting ) . The primary outcome is daytime energy expenditure and its ratio to resting energy expenditure , measured at baseline and one year using individually calibrated heart rate monitoring . Secondary measures include self-report of individual and family activity , psychological mediators of behaviour change , physiological and biochemical correlates , acceptability , and costs , measured at baseline , six months and one year . The primary intention to treat analysis will compare groups at one-year post r and omisation . Estimation of the impact on diabetes incidence will be modelled using data from a parallel ten-year cohort study using similar measures . Discussion ProActiveis the first efficacy trial of an intervention programme to promote physical activity in a defined high-risk group accessible through primary care . The intervention programme is based on psychological theory and evidence ; it introduces and facilitates the use of self-regulatory skills to support behaviour change and maintenance . The trial addresses a range of method ological weaknesses in the field by careful specification and quality assurance of the intervention programme , precise characterisation of participants , year-long follow-up and objective measurement of physical activity . Due to report in 2005 , ProActivewill provide estimates of the extent to which this approach could assist at-risk groups who could benefit from changes in behaviours affecting health , and inform future pragmatic trials
A significant positive effect of the interventions on weight was reported by all study types .
The meta- analysis showed that lifestyle interventions achieved weight and waist circumference reductions after one year .
However , no clear effects on biochemical or clinical parameters were observed , possibly due to short follow-up periods or lack of power of the studies meta-analysed .
Changes in dietary parameters or physical activity were generally not reported .
Most studies assessing feasibility were supportive of implementation of lifestyle interventions in routine clinical care .
Conclusion Lifestyle interventions for patients at high risk of diabetes , delivered by a variety of healthcare providers in routine clinical setting s , are feasible but appear to be of limited clinical benefit one year after intervention .
Despite convincing evidence from structured intensive trials , this systematic review showed that translation into routine practice has less effect on diabetes risk reduction
Background The clinical effectiveness of intensive lifestyle interventions in preventing or delaying diabetes in people at high risk has been established from r and omised trials of structured , intensive interventions conducted in several countries over the past two decades .
The challenge is to translate them into routine clinical setting s. The objective of this review is to determine whether lifestyle interventions delivered to high-risk adult patients in routine clinical care setting s are feasible and effective in achieving reductions in risk factors for diabetes .