The ODI remains a valid and vigorous measure and has been a worthwhile outcome measure .
The behavior of the instrument is incompletely understood , particularly in sensitivity to real change .
The Oswestry Disability Index ( ODI ) has become one of the principal condition-specific outcome measures used in the management of spinal disorders .
To review the versions of this instrument , document methods by which it has been vali date d , collate data from scores found in normal and back pain population s , provide curves for power calculations in studies using the ODI , and maintain the ODI as a gold st and ard outcome measure .
It has now been 20 years since its original publication .
Defining the minimum level of detectable change for the Roland-Morris questionnaire.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The Rol and -Morris Question naire ( RMQ ) is a self-administered disability measure in which greater levels of disability are reflected by higher numbers on a 24-point scale . The RMQ has been shown to yield reliable measurements , which are valid for inferring the level of disability , and to be sensitive to change over time for groups of patients with low back pain . Little is known about the usefulness of this instrument in aiding decision making regarding individual patients . The purpose of this study was to determine the minimum level of detectable change when the RMQ is applied to individual patients . SUBJECTS The study sample consisted of 60 out patients with low back pain . METHODS The RMQ was administered at the subjects ' initial visit and again 4 to 6 weeks later . Conditional st and ard errors of measurement ( CSEMs ) were computed for initial and follow-up RMQ scores , and these values were used to estimate the minimum level of detectable change . Results . Minimum levels of detectable change at the 90 % confidence level varied from 4 to 5 RMQ points . CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION The magnitude of CSEMs is sufficiently small to detect change in patients with initial scores in the central portion of the scale ( 4 - 20 RMQ points ) ; however , the magnitude is too large to detect improvement in patients with scores of less than 4 and deterioration in patients who have scores greater than 20
The ODI remains a valid and vigorous measure and has been a worthwhile outcome measure .
The behavior of the instrument is incompletely understood , particularly in sensitivity to real change .
The Oswestry Disability Index ( ODI ) has become one of the principal condition-specific outcome measures used in the management of spinal disorders .
To review the versions of this instrument , document methods by which it has been vali date d , collate data from scores found in normal and back pain population s , provide curves for power calculations in studies using the ODI , and maintain the ODI as a gold st and ard outcome measure .
It has now been 20 years since its original publication .