The 50 original articles included in this qualitative , systematic review revealed that the recommendations " Tourniquet " of the DGAI published in 2016 are mostly still up to date despite an inhomogeneous study situation .
INTRODUCTION The effectiveness of a  tourniquet  in the case of life-threatening hemorrhages of the extremities is well recognized and led to the recommendations on " Tourniquet " of the German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care ( DGAI ) in 2016 .
The aim of this systematic review was to re-evaluate the current medical literature in relation to the published DGAI recommendations .
Systematic review of prehospital tourniquet use in civilian limb trauma
BACKGROUND Military enthusiasm for limb tourniquet use in combat casualty care has result ed in acceptance by the trauma community for use in the prehospital care of civilian limb injuries . To date , there has been no report synthesizing the published data on civilian tourniquet use . The objective of this systematic review was to compile and analyze the content and quality of published data on the civilian use of tourniquets in limb trauma . METHODS The MEDLINE data base was search ed for studies on civilian limb tourniquet use in adults published between 2001 and 2017 . Search terms were tourniquet , trauma , and injury . Military reports and case series lacking systematic data collection were excluded . Counts and percentages were aggregated and weighted for analysis . RESULTS Reports were included from six regional trauma centers and one interregional collaboration ( total of 572 cases ) . One national prehospital data base report was included but analyzed separately ( 2,048 cases ) . All were retrospective cohort studies without prospect i ve data collection . Three reports defined a primary outcome , two had a nontourniquet control group , and no two articles reported the same variables . Limb injury severity and characteristics were inconsistently and incompletely described across reports , as were tourniquet indications and effectiveness . Arterial injury was reported in two studies and was infrequent among cases of tourniquet use . Mortality was low , and limb-specific complications were infrequent but variably reported . CONCLUSION The rapid increase in the civilian use of tourniquets for limb hemorrhage control has occurred without a large amount or high quality of data . Adoption of a multicenter registry with st and ardized data collection specific to limb trauma and tourniquet use can serve to improve the trauma community 's underst and ing of the safety and effectiveness of tourniquet use in civilian trauma setting s. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Systematic review , level IV
The 50 original articles included in this qualitative , systematic review revealed that the recommendations " Tourniquet " of the DGAI published in 2016 are mostly still up to date despite an inhomogeneous study situation .
INTRODUCTION The effectiveness of a  tourniquet  in the case of life-threatening hemorrhages of the extremities is well recognized and led to the recommendations on " Tourniquet " of the German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care ( DGAI ) in 2016 .
The aim of this systematic review was to re-evaluate the current medical literature in relation to the published DGAI recommendations .