Conclusions HbA1c is neither sensitive nor specific for detecting pre‐diabetes ; fasting glucose is specific but not sensitive .
Interventions in people classified through screening as having pre‐diabetes have some efficacy in preventing or delaying onset of type 2 diabetes in trial population s. As screening is inaccurate , many people will receives an incorrect diagnosis and be referred on for interventions while others will be falsely reassured and not offered the intervention .
These findings suggest that “ screen and treat ” policies alone are unlikely to have substantial impact on the worsening epidemic of type 2 diabetes .
& NA ; Objectives To assess diagnostic accuracy of screening tests for  pre‐diabetes  and efficacy of interventions ( lifestyle or metformin ) in preventing onset of type 2 diabetes in people with pre‐diabetes .
Tianjin Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Prevention Program: study design, methods, and 1-year interim report on the feasibility of lifestyle intervention program.
OBJECTIVE To assess whether lifestyle intervention can reduce type 2  diabetes risk in women with prior GDM in the Tianjin Gestational Diabetes Mellitus ( GDM ) Prevention Program . METHODS 1180 women who were diagnosed with GDM from 2005 to 2009 were r and omly assigned to either a lifestyle intervention ( n=586 ) or a control group ( n=594 ) . Major elements of the intervention include six face-to-face meetings with study dietitians in the first year , and two additional sessions and two telephone calls in second year . RESULTS During the first year , average body weight loss in the first 404 subjects was 1.40 kg ( 2.1 % ) in the intervention group vs 0.21 kg ( 0.3 % ) in the control group ( P=0.001 ) , and the decrease was more significant among baseline overweight women ( body bass index [ BMI ] ≥24 kg/m² ) in the intervention ( 2.91 kg/4.2 % ) compared with that in the control group ( 0.51 kg/0.7 % ) ( P<0.001 ) . In addition , women in the intervention group , compared with those in the control group , have decreased BMI , body fat , waist circumference , and plasma insulin levels , and have improved behaviors including increased leisure time activity and dietary fiber intake and decreased sedentary time and fat consumptions . CONCLUSION The interim results support the efficacy and feasibility of the lifestyle intervention program
Conclusions HbA1c is neither sensitive nor specific for detecting pre‐diabetes ; fasting glucose is specific but not sensitive .
Interventions in people classified through screening as having pre‐diabetes have some efficacy in preventing or delaying onset of type 2 diabetes in trial population s. As screening is inaccurate , many people will receives an incorrect diagnosis and be referred on for interventions while others will be falsely reassured and not offered the intervention .
These findings suggest that “ screen and treat ” policies alone are unlikely to have substantial impact on the worsening epidemic of type 2 diabetes .
& NA ; Objectives To assess diagnostic accuracy of screening tests for  pre‐diabetes  and efficacy of interventions ( lifestyle or metformin ) in preventing onset of type 2 diabetes in people with pre‐diabetes .