Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
A pilot study of a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effects of progressive resistance exercise training on shoulder dysfunction caused by spinal accessory neurapraxia/neurectomy in head and neck cancer survivors.
BACKGROUND Shoulder dysfunction remains a frequent complication after neck dissection procedures for head and neck cancer . METHODS We conducted a pilot study to evaluate the effects of progressive resistance exercise training ( PRET ) on shoulder dysfunction caused by spinal accessory neurapraxia/neurectomy in patients with head and neck cancer . Twenty patients ( mean age , 61 + /- 7.7 years ) were r and omly assigned to PRET or st and ard care intervention . Subjects assigned to the PRET group exercised three times per week for 12 weeks . The goal of the exercise program was to enhance scapular stability and strength of the upper extremity . The resistance-training program was progressive in terms of number of sets and repetitions performed , as well as the amount of weight lifted , depending on performance status . RESULTS The completion rate for the trial was 85 % ( 17 of 20 ) . The exercise group completed 93 % of scheduled exercise sessions . Significant improvements were found in favor of the PRET group in active shoulder external rotation ( p = .001 ) , shoulder pain ( p = .038 ) , and overall score for shoulder pain and disability ( p = .045 ) . CONCLUSIONS The study results demonstrate a high rate of completion and adherence with our PRET program among patients with head and neck cancer . The preliminary findings , although limited , also suggest a potential therapeutic role for resistance exercise as an adjunct to st and ard physical therapy treatment
Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?