We did not find any differences between PSI and SI with respect to any other parameters .
Conclusions PSI  has advantages in axial alignment of the femoral component , operative time , and perioperative blood loss relative to SI .
No significant differences were found between PSI and SI with respect to alignment of the remaining components , number of outliers , or length of hospital stay .
Purpose The purpose of the present study was to compare patient-specific instrumentation ( PSI ) with st and ard instrumentation ( SI ) in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty ( TKA ) .
PSI is hypothesized to have advantages with respect to component alignment ; number of outliers ( defined as alignment > 3 ° from the target alignment ) ; operative time ; perioperative blood loss ; and length of hospital stay .
This new surgical technique is expected to exhibit superior performance .
Patient-specific computed tomography based instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled study
Purpose The aim of this study was to compare radiological results of total knee arthroplasties ( TKAs ) performed with patient-specific computed tomography (CT)-based instrumentation and conventional technique . The main study hypothesis was that CT-based patient-specific instrumentation ( PSI ) increases the accuracy of TKA . Methods A prospect i ve , r and omized controlled trial was carried out between January and December 2011 . A group of 112 patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled in this study and r and omly assigned to an experimental or control group . The experimental group comprised 52 patients operated on with the aid of the Signature ™ CT-based implant positioning system .  The control group consisted of 60 patients operated on using conventional instrumentation .  The radiographic evaluation of implant positioning and overall coronal alignment was performed 12 months after the surgery by using st and ing anteroposterior radiographs of the entire lower limb and st and ard lateral radiographs . Results Of the 112 patients initially enrolled for the study , 95 were included in the subsequent analyses . There were no statistically significant differences between groups in respect to coronal and sagittal component positioning and overall coronal alignment , except for frontal tibial component positioning . For this parameter , better results were obtained in the control group , with borderline statistical significance . Conclusions Our study did not reveal superiority of the CT-based PSI system over conventional instrumentation . Further high- quality investigations of patient-specific systems are absolutely indispensable to assess their utility for TKA . In our opinion , the surgeon applying PSI technology is required to have advanced knowledge and considerable experience with the conventional method
We did not find any differences between PSI and SI with respect to any other parameters .
Conclusions PSI  has advantages in axial alignment of the femoral component , operative time , and perioperative blood loss relative to SI .
No significant differences were found between PSI and SI with respect to alignment of the remaining components , number of outliers , or length of hospital stay .
Purpose The purpose of the present study was to compare patient-specific instrumentation ( PSI ) with st and ard instrumentation ( SI ) in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty ( TKA ) .
PSI is hypothesized to have advantages with respect to component alignment ; number of outliers ( defined as alignment > 3 ° from the target alignment ) ; operative time ; perioperative blood loss ; and length of hospital stay .
This new surgical technique is expected to exhibit superior performance .