Acetylsalicylic acid ( ASA ) did not reduce stroke or ' all cardiovascular events ' compared to placebo in primary prevention patients with elevated blood pressure and no prior cardiovascular disease .
Antiplatelet therapy with ASA for primary prevention in patients with elevated blood pressure provides a benefit , reduction in myocardial infa rct ion , which is negated by a harm of similar magnitude , increase in major haemorrhage .
The benefit of antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention in patients with elevated blood pressure is many times greater than the harm .
Benefit has not been demonstrated for warfarin therapy alone or in combination with aspirin in patients with elevated blood pressure .
BACKGROUND Elevated systemic blood pressure results in high intravascular pressure but the main complications , coronary heart disease ( CHD ) , ischaemic strokes and peripheral vascular disease ( PVD ) , are related to thrombosis rather than haemorrhage .
Some complications related to elevated blood pressure , heart failure or atrial fibrillation , are themselves associated with stroke and thromboembolism .
Therefore it is important to investigate if antithrombotic therapy may be useful in preventing thrombosis-related complications in patients with elevated blood pressure .
OBJECTIVES To conduct a systematic review of the role of antiplatelet therapy and anticoagulation in patients with high blood pressure , including those with elevations in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure , isolated elevations of either systolic or diastolic blood pressure , to address the following hypotheses : ( i ) antiplatelet agents reduce total deaths and /or major thrombotic events when compared to placebo or other active treatment ; and ( ii ) oral anticoagulants reduce total deaths and /or major thromboembolic events when compared to placebo or other active treatment .
Ticlopidine , clopidogrel and newer antiplatelet agents such as prasugrel and ticagrelor have not been sufficiently evaluated in patients with high blood pressure .
Effects of pretreatment with clopidogrel and aspirin followed by long-term therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the PCI-CURE study
BACKGROUND Despite the use of aspirin , there is still a risk of ischaemic events after percutaneous coronary intervention ( PCI ) . We aim ed to find out whether , in addition to aspirin , pretreatment with clopidogrel followed by long-term therapy after PCI is superior to a strategy of no pretreatment and short-term therapy for only 4 weeks after PCI . METHODS 2658 patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome undergoing PCI in the CURE study had been r and omly assigned double-blind treatment with clopidogrel ( n=1313 ) or placebo ( n=1345 ) . Patients were pretreated with aspirin and study drug for a median of 6 days before PCI during the initial hospital admission , and for a median of 10 days overall . After PCI , most patients ( > 80 % ) in both groups received open-label thienopyridine for about 4 weeks , after which study drug was restarted for a mean of 8 months . The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death , myocardial infa rct ion , or urgent target-vessel revascularisation within 30 days of PCI . The main analysis was by intention to treat . FINDINGS There were no drop-outs . 59 ( 4.5 % ) patients in the clopidogrel group had the primary endpoint , compared with 86 ( 6.4 % ) in the placebo group ( relative risk 0.70 [ 95 % CI 0.50 - 0.97 ] , p=0.03 ) . Long-term administration of clopidogrel after PCI was associated with a lower rate of cardiovascular death , myocardial infa rct ion , or any revascularisation ( p=0.03 ) , and of cardiovascular death or myocardial infa rct ion ( p=0.047 ) . Overall ( including events before and after PCI ) there was a 31 % reduction cardiovascular death or myocardial infa rct ion ( p=0.002 ) . There was less use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor in the clopidogrel group ( p=0.001 ) . At follow-up , there was no significant difference in major bleeding between the groups ( p=0.64 ) . INTERPRETATION In patients with acute coronary syndrome receiving aspirin  , a strategy of clopidogrel pretreatment followed by long-term therapy is beneficial in reducing major cardiovascular events , compared with placebo
Acetylsalicylic acid ( ASA ) did not reduce stroke or ' all cardiovascular events ' compared to placebo in primary prevention patients with elevated blood pressure and no prior cardiovascular disease .
Antiplatelet therapy with ASA for primary prevention in patients with elevated blood pressure provides a benefit , reduction in myocardial infa rct ion , which is negated by a harm of similar magnitude , increase in major haemorrhage .
The benefit of antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention in patients with elevated blood pressure is many times greater than the harm .
Benefit has not been demonstrated for warfarin therapy alone or in combination with aspirin in patients with elevated blood pressure .
BACKGROUND Elevated systemic blood pressure results in high intravascular pressure but the main complications , coronary heart disease ( CHD ) , ischaemic strokes and peripheral vascular disease ( PVD ) , are related to thrombosis rather than haemorrhage .
Some complications related to elevated blood pressure , heart failure or atrial fibrillation , are themselves associated with stroke and thromboembolism .
Therefore it is important to investigate if antithrombotic therapy may be useful in preventing thrombosis-related complications in patients with elevated blood pressure .
OBJECTIVES To conduct a systematic review of the role of antiplatelet therapy and anticoagulation in patients with high blood pressure , including those with elevations in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure , isolated elevations of either systolic or diastolic blood pressure , to address the following hypotheses : ( i ) antiplatelet agents reduce total deaths and /or major thrombotic events when compared to placebo or other active treatment ; and ( ii ) oral anticoagulants reduce total deaths and /or major thromboembolic events when compared to placebo or other active treatment .
Ticlopidine , clopidogrel and newer antiplatelet agents such as prasugrel and ticagrelor have not been sufficiently evaluated in patients with high blood pressure .