No statistically significant difference was found between the pacing modes for mortality , heart failure , stroke , chronic atrial fibrillation or quality of life .
However , the risk of developing heart failure may vary with age and device .
The risk of heart failure may have an impact on the decision to use dual-chamber or single-chamber atrial pacemakers .
Results from an analysis based on age ( > 75 years or ≤ 75 years ) and risk of heart failure indicate that dual-chamber pacemakers dominate single-chamber atrial pacemakers ( i.e. are less expensive and more effective ) in older patients , whereas dual-chamber pacemakers are dominated by ( i.e. more expensive and less effective ) single-chamber atrial pacemakers in younger patients .
In patients with SSS without evidence of impaired AV conduction , dual-chamber pacemakers appear to be cost-effective compared with single-chamber atrial pacemakers .
BACKGROUND Bradycardia [ resting heart rate below 60 beats per minute ( b.p.m . ) ]
can be caused by conditions affecting the natural pacemakers of the heart , such as sick sinus syndrome ( SSS ) and atrioventricular ( AV ) blocks .
People suffering from bradycardia may present with palpitations , exercise intolerance and fainting .
The only effective treatment for patients suffering from symptomatic bradycardia is implantation of a permanent pacemaker .
OBJECTIVE To appraise the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of dual-chamber pacemakers compared with single-chamber atrial pacemakers for treating symptomatic bradycardia in people with SSS and no evidence of AV block .
Atrial fibrillation and quality of life after pacemaker implantation for sick sinus syndrome: data from the Mode Selection Trial (MOST).
BACKGROUND In the Mode Selection Trial ( MOST ) of 2,010 patients with sinus node dysfunction , dual-chamber-paced patients had less atrial fibrillation ( AF ) and heart failure and had slightly improved health-related quality of life ( QOL ) compared with rate modulated right ventricular-paced patients . Our objective was to assess the impact of AF on QOL within MOST . METHODS We analyzed serial QOL measures ( Short Form-36 , Specific Activity Scale , time trade-off ) in 3 groups : ( 1 ) those without AF ; ( 2 ) those with paroxysmal AF ( PAF ) , but not chronic AF ( CAF ) ; and ( 3 ) those with CAF . We carried forward the last known QOL before crossover for all subsequent time points in patients r and omized to rate modulated right ventricular pacing who crossed over to dual-chamber pacing for severe pacemaker syndrome . RESULTS Three hundred seventeen patients ( 15.8 % ) had AF in the year after implantation , 206 patients within 3 months ( 191 PAF , 15 CAF ) , and another 159 ( 124 PAF , 35 CAF ) between 3 and 12 months . There were no significant differences among groups in individual Short Form-36 subscales or time trade-off scores at 12 months as compared with baseline or 3 months . Cardiovascular health status was better at 12 months as compared with baseline or 3 months in those without AF . CONCLUSIONS Atrial fibrillation after pacemaker implantation in elderly patients with sick sinus syndrome was not a major determinant of QOL . However , there was a trend toward better cardiovascular functional status in patients without AF
No statistically significant difference was found between the pacing modes for mortality , heart failure , stroke , chronic atrial fibrillation or quality of life .
However , the risk of developing heart failure may vary with age and device .
The risk of heart failure may have an impact on the decision to use dual-chamber or single-chamber atrial pacemakers .
Results from an analysis based on age ( > 75 years or ≤ 75 years ) and risk of heart failure indicate that dual-chamber pacemakers dominate single-chamber atrial pacemakers ( i.e. are less expensive and more effective ) in older patients , whereas dual-chamber pacemakers are dominated by ( i.e. more expensive and less effective ) single-chamber atrial pacemakers in younger patients .
In patients with SSS without evidence of impaired AV conduction , dual-chamber pacemakers appear to be cost-effective compared with single-chamber atrial pacemakers .
BACKGROUND Bradycardia [ resting heart rate below 60 beats per minute ( b.p.m . ) ]
can be caused by conditions affecting the natural pacemakers of the heart , such as sick sinus syndrome ( SSS ) and atrioventricular ( AV ) blocks .
People suffering from bradycardia may present with palpitations , exercise intolerance and fainting .
The only effective treatment for patients suffering from symptomatic bradycardia is implantation of a permanent pacemaker .
OBJECTIVE To appraise the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of dual-chamber pacemakers compared with single-chamber atrial pacemakers for treating symptomatic bradycardia in people with SSS and no evidence of AV block .