Among CVRM patients , the results tended towards a beneficial effect of CDSS , but only LDL-c target attainment in diabetes patients reached statistical significance .
Prompting , integration into the electronical health record , patient empowerment , and medication support were related to more effective CVRM .
Conclusion We did not find a clear clinical benefit from CDSS in cardiovascular risk factor levels and target attainment .
Some features of CDSS seem more promising than others .
Clinical relevance of CDSS in CVRM might additionally be sought in the improvement of shared decision making and patient empowerment
Background Cardiovascular risk management ( CVRM ) is notoriously difficult because of multi-morbidity and the different phenotypes and severities of cardiovascular disease .
Computerized decision support systems ( CDSS ) enable the clinician to integrate the latest scientific evidence and patient information into tailored strategies .
The effect on cardiovascular risk factor management is yet to be confirmed .
Effects of computerized guidelines for managing heart disease in primary care
BACKGROUND : Electronic information systems have been proposed as one means to reduce medical errors of commission ( doing the wrong thing ) and omission ( not providing indicated care ) . OBJECTIVE : To assess the effects of computer-based cardiac care suggestions . DESIGN : A r and omized , controlled trial targeting primary care physicians and pharmacists . SUBJECTS : A total of 706 out patients with heart failure and /or ischemic heart disease . INTERVENTIONS : Evidence -based cardiac care suggestions , approved by a panel of local cardiologists and general internists , were displayed to physicians and pharmacists as they cared for enrolled patients . MEASUREMENTS : Adherence with the care suggestions , generic and condition-specific quality of life , acute exacerbations of their cardiac disease , medication compliance , health care costs , satisfaction with care , and physicians ’ attitudes toward guidelines . RESULTS : Subjects were followed for 1 year during which they made 3,419 primary care visits and were eligible for 2,609 separate cardiac care suggestions . The intervention had no effect on physicians ’ adherence to the care suggestions ( 23 % for intervention patients vs 22 % for controls ) . There were no intervention-control differences in quality of life , medication compliance , health care utilization , costs , or satisfaction with care . Physicians viewed guidelines as providing helpful information but constraining their practice and not helpful in making decisions for individual patients . CONCLUSIONS : Care suggestions generated by a sophisticated electronic medical record system failed to improve adherence to accepted practice guidelines or outcomes for patients with heart disease . Future studies must weigh the benefits and costs of different ( and perhaps more Draconian ) methods of affecting clinician behavior
Among CVRM patients , the results tended towards a beneficial effect of CDSS , but only LDL-c target attainment in diabetes patients reached statistical significance .
Prompting , integration into the electronical health record , patient empowerment , and medication support were related to more effective CVRM .
Conclusion We did not find a clear clinical benefit from CDSS in cardiovascular risk factor levels and target attainment .
Some features of CDSS seem more promising than others .
Clinical relevance of CDSS in CVRM might additionally be sought in the improvement of shared decision making and patient empowerment
Background Cardiovascular risk management ( CVRM ) is notoriously difficult because of multi-morbidity and the different phenotypes and severities of cardiovascular disease .
Computerized decision support systems ( CDSS ) enable the clinician to integrate the latest scientific evidence and patient information into tailored strategies .
The effect on cardiovascular risk factor management is yet to be confirmed .