Systematic and opportunistic screening for AF increase the rate of detection of new cases compared with routine practice .
While both approaches have a comparable effect on the overall AF diagnosis rate , the cost of systematic screening is significantly more than that of opportunistic screening from the perspective of the health service provider .
BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is the most common arrhythmia in clinical practice and is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality .
Screening for AF in asymptomatic patients has been proposed as a way of reducing the burden of the disease by detecting people who would benefit from prophylactic anticoagulation therapy prior to the onset of symptoms .
However , for screening to be an effective intervention it must improve the detection of AF and provide benefit for those who are detected earlier as a result of screening .
OBJECTIVES The primary objective of this review was to examine whether screening programmes increase the detection of new cases of AF compared to routine practice .
The secondary objectives were to identify which combination of screening strategy and patient population is most effective , as well as assessing any safety issues associated with screening , its acceptability within the target population and the costs involved .
Simplified electrocardiogram sampling maintains high diagnostic capability for atrial fibrillation: implications for opportunistic atrial fibrillation screening in primary care.
AIMS Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is a major cause of morbidity , mortality , and health re source consumption . However , as many patients with chronic AF are asymptomatic , rapid , accurate opportunistic screening is needed in primary care to detect AF . Conventional electrocardiogram ( ECG ) technology is too clumsy and time consuming for mass opportunistic screening , thus technology that allows easy , rapid , yet accurate AF screening is required . To address this requirement a prototype h and -held electrode assembly was developed . We hypothesized that a 6-lead frontal-plane ECG acquired from this apparatus in a seated , clothed patient would be as accurate at detecting AF as conventional 12-lead ECG in the undressed , supine patient ( the ' gold st and ard ' ) . METHODS AND RESULTS Electrocardiograms were obtained from 78 patients with AF and 79 with sinus rhythm ( SR ) . All had a  conventional 12-lead ECG  , a 6-lead ECG from conventionally positioned limb electrodes , a supine 6-lead recording using the prototype recorder placed on the lower thorax/upper abdomen , and a 6-lead prototype recording in the seated patient , the latter with loosened clothing only . Electrocardiograms were r and omly and blindly assessed by two cardiologists for ( i ) diagnosis of AF vs. SR and ( ii ) tracing quality ( subjectively assessed as good , adequate , or bad ) . Compared with conventional 12-lead ECG recordings , all ' new ' recording methods performed satisfactorily with sensitivities ≥90 % ( 90 - 99 % ) , specificities ≥94 % ( 94 - 100 % ) , positive predictive values ≥94 % ( 94 - 100 % ) , negative predictive values ≥90 % ( 90 - 99 % ) , and accuracies ≥93 % ( 93 - 99 % ) . Tracing quality was higher in conventional 12-lead recordings ( 71 and 80 % were assessed as good by the two observers ) compared with conventional 6-lead ( 57 and 59 % ) , supine prototype ( 41 and 31 % ) , and sitting prototype ( 39 and 19 % ) . CONCLUSIONS Despite inferior electrocardiographic quality a 6-lead frontal plane ECG acquired by a simple prototype h and -held electrode assembly allowed reliable differentiation of AF from SR compared with st and ard 12-lead ECG
Systematic and opportunistic screening for AF increase the rate of detection of new cases compared with routine practice .
While both approaches have a comparable effect on the overall AF diagnosis rate , the cost of systematic screening is significantly more than that of opportunistic screening from the perspective of the health service provider .
BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is the most common arrhythmia in clinical practice and is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality .
Screening for AF in asymptomatic patients has been proposed as a way of reducing the burden of the disease by detecting people who would benefit from prophylactic anticoagulation therapy prior to the onset of symptoms .
However , for screening to be an effective intervention it must improve the detection of AF and provide benefit for those who are detected earlier as a result of screening .
OBJECTIVES The primary objective of this review was to examine whether screening programmes increase the detection of new cases of AF compared to routine practice .
The secondary objectives were to identify which combination of screening strategy and patient population is most effective , as well as assessing any safety issues associated with screening , its acceptability within the target population and the costs involved .