IATs improve intracanal cleanliness across a substantial portion of the canal , and therefore , their use is recommended throughout root canal preparation .
AIMS To establish whether irrigant activation techniques ( IATs ) result in greater intracanal smear layer and debris removal than conventional needle irrigation ( CNI ) .
Smear layer removal with passive ultrasonic irrigation and the NaviTip FX: a scanning electron microscopic study.
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to compare the effect of continuous , intermittent passive ultrasonic irrigation ( PUI ) and active scrubbing of irrigants with NaviTip FX ( Ultradent , South Jordan , UT ) in removing smear layer . STUDY DESIGN Forty single-rooted teeth were r and omly divided into 5 test groups and subjected to final irrigation with 17 % EDTA followed by 2.5 % NaOCl for 1 minute each using different activation methods : no activation ( control ) , brushing with NaviTip FX , continuous PUI with irrigant delivered at pulp chamber , continuous PUI with irrigant delivered through the ultrasonic unit , and intermittent PUI . Specimens were examined under scanning electron microscope , and the data were analyzed using Friedman 2-way analysis of variance , Kruskal-Wallis , and Mann-Whitney U tests . RESULTS NaviTip FX and intermittent PUI showed significantly lower smear score than other groups at the 3 mm level ( P < .05 ) . CONCLUSIONS Both brush and intermittent ultrasonic activation were effective in the removal of smear layer from the apical third
IATs improve intracanal cleanliness across a substantial portion of the canal , and therefore , their use is recommended throughout root canal preparation .
AIMS To establish whether irrigant activation techniques ( IATs ) result in greater intracanal smear layer and debris removal than conventional needle irrigation ( CNI ) .