There is uncertainty whether current strategies for providing CVD risk scores  affect CVD events .
Providing CVD risk scores may slightly reduce CVD risk factor levels and may increase preventive medication prescribing in higher-risk people without evidence of harm .
BACKGROUND The current paradigm for cardiovascular disease ( CVD ) emphasises absolute risk assessment to guide treatment decisions in primary prevention .
Although the derivation and validation of multivariable risk assessment tools , or CVD risk scores , have attracted considerable attention , their effect on clinical outcomes is uncertain .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of evaluating and providing CVD risk scores in adults without prevalent CVD on cardiovascular outcomes , risk factor levels , preventive medication prescribing , and health behaviours .
Electronic Health Record-Based Patient Identification and Individualized Mailed Outreach for Primary Cardiovascular Disease Prevention: A Cluster Randomized Trial
ABSTRACT BACKGROUND Many individuals at higher risk for cardiovascular disease ( CVD ) do not receive recommended treatments . Prior interventions using personalized risk information to promote prevention did not test clinic-wide effectiveness . OBJECTIVE AND DESIGN To perform a 9-month cluster-r and omized trial , comparing a strategy of electronic health record-based identification of patients with increased CVD risk and individualized mailed outreach to usual care . PARTICIPANTS Patients of participating physicians with a Framingham Risk Score of at least 5 % , low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol level above guideline threshold for drug treatment , and not prescribed a lipid-lowering medication were included in the intention-to-treat analysis .INTERVENTION Patients of physicians r and omized to the intervention group were mailed individualized CVD risk messages that described benefits of using a statin ( and controlling hypertension or quitting smoking when relevant).MAIN MEASURES The primary outcome was occurrence of a LDL-cholesterol level , repeated in routine practice , that was at least 30 mg/dl lower than prior . A secondary outcome was lipid-lowering drug prescribing . Clinical trials.gov identifier : NCT01286311.KEY RESULTS Fourteen physicians with 218 patients were r and omized to intervention , and 15 physicians with 217 patients to control . The mean patient age was 60.7 years and 77 % were male . There was no difference in the primary outcome ( 11.0 % vs. 11.1 % , OR 0.99 , 95 % CI 0.56–1.74 , P = 0.96 ) , but intervention group patients were twice as likely to receive a prescription for lipid-lowering medication ( 11.9 % , vs. 6.0 % , OR 2.13 , 95 % CI 1.05–4.32 , p = 0.038 ) . In post hoc analysis with extended follow-up to 18 months , the primary outcome occurred more often in the intervention group ( 22.5 % vs. 16.1 % , OR 1.59 , 95 % CI 1.05–2.41 , P = 0.029 ) . CONCLUSIONS In this effectiveness trial , individualized mailed CVD risk messages increased the frequency of new lipid-lowering drug prescriptions , but we observed no difference in proportions lowering LDL-cholesterol after 9 months . With longer follow-up , the intervention ’s effect on LDL-cholesterol levels was apparent
There is uncertainty whether current strategies for providing CVD risk scores  affect CVD events .
Providing CVD risk scores may slightly reduce CVD risk factor levels and may increase preventive medication prescribing in higher-risk people without evidence of harm .
BACKGROUND The current paradigm for cardiovascular disease ( CVD ) emphasises absolute risk assessment to guide treatment decisions in primary prevention .
Although the derivation and validation of multivariable risk assessment tools , or CVD risk scores , have attracted considerable attention , their effect on clinical outcomes is uncertain .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of evaluating and providing CVD risk scores in adults without prevalent CVD on cardiovascular outcomes , risk factor levels , preventive medication prescribing , and health behaviours .