A significant positive effect of the interventions on weight was reported by all study types .
The meta- analysis showed that lifestyle interventions achieved weight and waist circumference reductions after one year .
However , no clear effects on biochemical or clinical parameters were observed , possibly due to short follow-up periods or lack of power of the studies meta-analysed .
Changes in dietary parameters or physical activity were generally not reported .
Most studies assessing feasibility were supportive of implementation of lifestyle interventions in routine clinical care .
Conclusion Lifestyle interventions for patients at high risk of diabetes , delivered by a variety of healthcare providers in routine clinical setting s , are feasible but appear to be of limited clinical benefit one year after intervention .
Despite convincing evidence from structured intensive trials , this systematic review showed that translation into routine practice has less effect on diabetes risk reduction
Background The clinical effectiveness of intensive lifestyle interventions in preventing or delaying diabetes in people at high risk has been established from r and omised trials of structured , intensive interventions conducted in several countries over the past two decades .
The challenge is to translate them into routine clinical setting s. The objective of this review is to determine whether lifestyle interventions delivered to high-risk adult patients in routine clinical care setting s are feasible and effective in achieving reductions in risk factors for diabetes .
The Indian Diabetes Prevention Programme shows that lifestyle modification and metformin prevent type 2 diabetes in Asian Indian subjects with impaired glucose tolerance (IDPP-1)
Aims /hypothesisLifestyle modification helps in the primary prevention of diabetes in multiethnic American , Finnish and Chinese population s. In a prospect i ve community-based study , we tested whether the progression to diabetes could be influenced by interventions in native Asian Indians with IGT who were younger , leaner and more insulin resistant than the above population s. Methods We r and omised 531 ( 421 men 110 women ) subjects with IGT ( mean age 45.9±5.7 years , BMI 25.8±3.5 kg/m2 ) into four groups . Group 1 was the control , Group 2 was given advice on lifestyle modification ( LSM ) , Group 3 was treated with metformin ( MET ) and Group 4 was given LSM plus MET . The primary outcome measure was type 2 diabetes as diagnosed using World Health Organization criteria . Results The median follow-up period was 30 months , and the 3-year cumulative incidences of diabetes were 55.0 % , 39.3 % , 40.5 % and 39.5 % in Groups 1–4 , respectively . The relative risk reduction was 28.5 % with LSM ( 95 % CI 20.5–37.3 , p=0.018 ) , 26.4 % with MET ( 95 % CI 19.1–35.1 , p=0.029 ) and 28.2 % with LSM + MET ( 95 % CI 20.3–37.0 , p=0.022 ) , as compared with the control group . The number needed to treat to prevent one incident case of diabetes was 6.4 for LSM , 6.9 for MET and 6.5 for LSM + MET . Conclusions /interpretationProgression of IGT to diabetes is high in native Asian Indians .  Both LSM and MET significantly reduced the incidence of diabetes  in Asian Indians with IGT ; there was no added benefit from combining them
A significant positive effect of the interventions on weight was reported by all study types .
The meta- analysis showed that lifestyle interventions achieved weight and waist circumference reductions after one year .
However , no clear effects on biochemical or clinical parameters were observed , possibly due to short follow-up periods or lack of power of the studies meta-analysed .
Changes in dietary parameters or physical activity were generally not reported .
Most studies assessing feasibility were supportive of implementation of lifestyle interventions in routine clinical care .
Conclusion Lifestyle interventions for patients at high risk of diabetes , delivered by a variety of healthcare providers in routine clinical setting s , are feasible but appear to be of limited clinical benefit one year after intervention .
Despite convincing evidence from structured intensive trials , this systematic review showed that translation into routine practice has less effect on diabetes risk reduction
Background The clinical effectiveness of intensive lifestyle interventions in preventing or delaying diabetes in people at high risk has been established from r and omised trials of structured , intensive interventions conducted in several countries over the past two decades .
The challenge is to translate them into routine clinical setting s. The objective of this review is to determine whether lifestyle interventions delivered to high-risk adult patients in routine clinical care setting s are feasible and effective in achieving reductions in risk factors for diabetes .