PRT had a large positive effect on strength ( 41 trials , 1955 participants ) , but there was statistical heterogeneity that was not explained by differences in study quality , participant characteristics or the exercise program .
REVIEW ER 'S CONCLUSIONS PRT appears to be an effective intervention to increase strength in older people and has a positive effect on some functional limitations .
However , the effect of this intervention on more substantive outcomes such as measures of disability or HRQOL remains unclear .
BACKGROUND Muscle weakness in old age , is associated with physical disability and an increased risk of falls .
Progressive resistance strength ( PRT ) training exercises ( i.e. movements performed against a specific external force that is regularly increased during training ) are design ed to increase strength in older people .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effect of PRT on measures of physical disability , functional limitation and impairment in older people  , and identify adverse events .
Isokinetic strength training of the hemiparetic knee: effects on function and spasticity.
PURPOSE To determine whether isokinetic training can improve the strength of the hemiparetic knee musculature , functional mobility , and physical activity and to evaluate its effect on spasticity in long-term stroke survivors . DESIGN Nonr and omized self-controlled trial . SUBJECTS A volunteer sample of 15 community-dwelling stroke survivors of at least 6 months . INTERVENTION A 6-week ( 3 days/week , 40 minutes/day ) program consisting of warm-up , stretches , reciprocal knee extension and flexion isokinetic strengthening , and cool-down for the paretic limb . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Peak isokinetic hamstring and quadriceps torque , quadriceps spasticity , gait velocity , timed Up and Go , timed stair climb , and the Human Activity Profile ( HAP ) scores were recorded at baseline , after training , and 4 weeks after training cessation ( follow-up ) . RESULTS Paretic muscle strength improved after training ( p < .05 ) while tone remained consistent ( p > .87 ) . Gait velocity increased after training ( p < .05 ) and at follow-up ( p < .05 ) . Changes in stair climbing and timed Up and Go were not significant ( p > .37 ; p > .91 ) , although subjects perceived gains in their physical abilities at follow-up ( p < .01 ) . CONCLUSIONS Gains in strength and gait velocity without concomitant increases in muscle tone are possible after a short-term strengthening program for stroke survivors . The psychological benefit associated with physical activity is significant
PRT had a large positive effect on strength ( 41 trials , 1955 participants ) , but there was statistical heterogeneity that was not explained by differences in study quality , participant characteristics or the exercise program .
REVIEW ER 'S CONCLUSIONS PRT appears to be an effective intervention to increase strength in older people and has a positive effect on some functional limitations .
However , the effect of this intervention on more substantive outcomes such as measures of disability or HRQOL remains unclear .
BACKGROUND Muscle weakness in old age , is associated with physical disability and an increased risk of falls .
Progressive resistance strength ( PRT ) training exercises ( i.e. movements performed against a specific external force that is regularly increased during training ) are design ed to increase strength in older people .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effect of PRT on measures of physical disability , functional limitation and impairment in older people  , and identify adverse events .