Physiotherapists partially recognised cognitive , psychological and social factors in people with LBP .
Physiotherapists expressed a preference for dealing with the more mechanical aspects of LBP , and some stigmatised the behaviours suggestive of cognitive , psychological and social contributions to LBP .
Physiotherapists perceived that neither their initial training , nor currently available professional development training , instilled them with the requisite skills and confidence to successfully address and treat the multidimensional pain presentations seen in LBP .
QUESTION What are physiotherapists ' perceptions about identifying and managing the cognitive , psychological and social factors that may act as barriers to recovery for people with low back pain ( LBP ) ?
What is "the good back-consultation"? A combined qualitative and quantitative study of chronic low back pain patients' interaction with and perceptions of consultations with specialists.
OBJECTIVE To identify core elements of what patients with chronic low back pain perceive as good clinical communication and interaction with a specialist ( " The Good Back-Consultation " ) . DESIGN Qualitative study including observation of consultations and a subsequent patient interview . Quantitative data were also recorded . SUBJECTS Thirty-five patients with chronic low back pain referred to a specialist . METHODS Thirty-five consultations were observed with respect to history-taking , clinical examination and interaction between patient and doctor . Patients were subsequently interviewed about how they perceived the consultation . Fourteen specialists with various specialty branches and 35 patients ( 18 males ) participated . For 3 of the specialists a positive effect ( return to work ) on patients with chronic low back pain had been documented in previous r and omized controlled trials . Qualitative data analysis was performed using a template method . RESULTS Most patients thought that the history-taking and clinical examination had been thorough and satisfactory . Patients emphasized the importance of being given an explanation during the examination of what was being done and found , of receiving underst and able information on the causes of the pain , of receiving reassurance , discussing psychosocial issues and discussing what can be done . The most important characteristic of " The Good Back-Consultation " was that the specialist took the patient seriously . CONCLUSION The findings may represent an important potential for enhancing clinical communication with patients
Physiotherapists partially recognised cognitive , psychological and social factors in people with LBP .
Physiotherapists expressed a preference for dealing with the more mechanical aspects of LBP , and some stigmatised the behaviours suggestive of cognitive , psychological and social contributions to LBP .
Physiotherapists perceived that neither their initial training , nor currently available professional development training , instilled them with the requisite skills and confidence to successfully address and treat the multidimensional pain presentations seen in LBP .
QUESTION What are physiotherapists ' perceptions about identifying and managing the cognitive , psychological and social factors that may act as barriers to recovery for people with low back pain ( LBP ) ?