No favourable effect on mortality was observed with STS HM .
Similar reductions were observed in all-cause hospitalisations for TM interventions , whereas STS interventions had no major effect .
STS HM was dominated by usual care .
Similar results were observed in scenario analyses performed using higher costs of usual care , higher costs of STS HH and lower costs of TM during office hours .
As a result , the economic model developed scenarios for different RM classifications and their costs were estimated using bottom-up costing methods .
Despite wide variation in usual care and RM strategies , cost-effectiveness analyses suggest that TM during office hours was an optimal strategy ( in most costing scenarios ) .
However , clarity was lacking among descriptions of the components of RM packages and usual care and there was a lack of robust estimation of costs .
BACKGROUND Remote monitoring ( RM ) strategies have the potential to deliver specialised care and management to patients with heart failure ( HF ) .
OBJECTIVE To determine the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of home telemonitoring ( TM ) or structured telephone support ( STS ) strategies compared with usual care for adult patients who have been recently discharged ( within 28 days ) from acute care after a recent exacerbation of HF .
The review included r and omised controlled trials ( RCTs ) or observational cohort studies with a contemporaneous control group that included the following RM interventions : ( 1 ) TM ( including cardiovascular implanted monitoring devices ) with medical support provided during office hours or 24/7 ; ( 2 ) STS programmes delivered by human-to-human contact ( HH ) or human-to-machine interface ( HM ) .
Home telemonitoring in heart failure patients: the HHH study (Home or Hospital in Heart Failure)
The Home or Hospital in Heart failure ( HHH ) study was a European Community‐funded , multinational , r and omized controlled clinical trial , conducted in the UK , Pol and , and Italy , to assess the feasibility of a new system of home telemonitoring ( HT ) . The HT system was used to monitor clinical and physiological parameters , and its effectiveness ( compared with usual care ) in reducing cardiac events in heart failure ( HF ) patients was evaluated . Measurements were patient‐managed
No favourable effect on mortality was observed with STS HM .
Similar reductions were observed in all-cause hospitalisations for TM interventions , whereas STS interventions had no major effect .
STS HM was dominated by usual care .
Similar results were observed in scenario analyses performed using higher costs of usual care , higher costs of STS HH and lower costs of TM during office hours .
As a result , the economic model developed scenarios for different RM classifications and their costs were estimated using bottom-up costing methods .
Despite wide variation in usual care and RM strategies , cost-effectiveness analyses suggest that TM during office hours was an optimal strategy ( in most costing scenarios ) .
However , clarity was lacking among descriptions of the components of RM packages and usual care and there was a lack of robust estimation of costs .
BACKGROUND Remote monitoring ( RM ) strategies have the potential to deliver specialised care and management to patients with heart failure ( HF ) .
OBJECTIVE To determine the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of home telemonitoring ( TM ) or structured telephone support ( STS ) strategies compared with usual care for adult patients who have been recently discharged ( within 28 days ) from acute care after a recent exacerbation of HF .
The review included r and omised controlled trials ( RCTs ) or observational cohort studies with a contemporaneous control group that included the following RM interventions : ( 1 ) TM ( including cardiovascular implanted monitoring devices ) with medical support provided during office hours or 24/7 ; ( 2 ) STS programmes delivered by human-to-human contact ( HH ) or human-to-machine interface ( HM ) .