Systematic and opportunistic screening for AF increase the rate of detection of new cases compared with routine practice .
While both approaches have a comparable effect on the overall AF diagnosis rate , the cost of systematic screening is significantly more than that of opportunistic screening from the perspective of the health service provider .
BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is the most common arrhythmia in clinical practice and is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality .
Screening for AF in asymptomatic patients has been proposed as a way of reducing the burden of the disease by detecting people who would benefit from prophylactic anticoagulation therapy prior to the onset of symptoms .
However , for screening to be an effective intervention it must improve the detection of AF and provide benefit for those who are detected earlier as a result of screening .
OBJECTIVES The primary objective of this review was to examine whether screening programmes increase the detection of new cases of AF compared to routine practice .
The secondary objectives were to identify which combination of screening strategy and patient population is most effective , as well as assessing any safety issues associated with screening , its acceptability within the target population and the costs involved .
Rising Rates of Hospital Admissions for Atrial Fibrillation
Background : Atrial fibrillation is a common arrhythmia associated with excess morbidity and mortality . We studied temporal changes in hospital admission rates for atrial fibrillation using data from a prospect i ve population -based cohort study spanning 2 decades ( the Copenhagen City Heart Study ) . Methods : The study included baseline data collected in 1981 through 1983 on 10,955 persons age 40 to 79 years and baseline data collected in 1991 through 1994 on 7212 persons age 40 to 79 years . We used hospital diagnosis data from the Danish National Hospital Discharge Register to determine the rate of first hospital admission for atrial fibrillation during 7 years following each of the 2 baseline data collecting periods . Changes in admission rates were analyzed using Cox proportional hazard models . Results : During the 2 7-year periods , 379 subjects were admitted with a hospital diagnosis of atrial fibrillation . The rate of hospital admissions for atrial fibrillation increased among both men and women from the first to the second period ( relative risk = 1.6 ; 95 % confidence interval = 1.3–1.9 [ adjusted for age , sex , prior myocardial infa rct ion , arterial hypertension , diabetes mellitus , electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy , decreased lung function , smoking , height , and weight ] ) . Conclusion : During the latest 10 to 20 years , there has been a 60 % increase in hospital admissions for atrial fibrillation independent of changes in known risk factors . This increase could result from changes in admission threshold or coding practice s , or it could reflect a genuine increase in the population incidence of atrial fibrillation
Systematic and opportunistic screening for AF increase the rate of detection of new cases compared with routine practice .
While both approaches have a comparable effect on the overall AF diagnosis rate , the cost of systematic screening is significantly more than that of opportunistic screening from the perspective of the health service provider .
BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is the most common arrhythmia in clinical practice and is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality .
Screening for AF in asymptomatic patients has been proposed as a way of reducing the burden of the disease by detecting people who would benefit from prophylactic anticoagulation therapy prior to the onset of symptoms .
However , for screening to be an effective intervention it must improve the detection of AF and provide benefit for those who are detected earlier as a result of screening .
OBJECTIVES The primary objective of this review was to examine whether screening programmes increase the detection of new cases of AF compared to routine practice .
The secondary objectives were to identify which combination of screening strategy and patient population is most effective , as well as assessing any safety issues associated with screening , its acceptability within the target population and the costs involved .