We found high quality evidence that hormone therapy in both primary and secondary prevention conferred no protective effects for all-cause mortality , cardiovascular death , non-fatal myocardial infa rct ion , angina , or revascularisation .
There was no strong evidence of effect on risk of stroke in this group .
Our review findings provide strong evidence that treatment with hormone therapy in post-menopausal women overall , for either primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease events has little if any benefit and causes an increase in the risk of stroke and venous thromboembolic events
BACKGROUND Evidence from systematic review s of observational studies suggests that hormone therapy may have beneficial effects in reducing the incidence of cardiovascular disease events in post-menopausal women , however the results of r and omised controlled trials ( RCTs ) have had mixed results .
This is an up date d version of a Cochrane review published in 2013 .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of hormone therapy for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in post-menopausal women , and whether there are differential effects between use in primary or secondary prevention .
Secondary aims were to undertake exploratory analyses to ( i ) assess the impact of time since menopause that treatment was commenced ( ≥ 10 years versus < 10 years ) , and where these data were not available , use age of trial participants at baseline as a proxy ( ≥ 60 years of age versus < 60 years of age ) ; and ( ii ) assess the effects of length of time on treatment .
Effect of lower doses of conjugated equine estrogens with and without medroxyprogesterone acetate on bone in early postmenopausal women.
CONTEXT Lower-than-commonly-prescribed doses of conjugated equine estrogens ( CEEs ) with medroxyprogesterone acetate ( MPA ) improve vasomotor symptoms and vaginal atrophy , provide acceptable bleeding and lipid profiles , and afford endometrial protection . This lower-dose therapy 's protection against loss of bone mineral density ( BMD ) associated with menopause has not been thoroughly investigated . OBJECTIVE To determine the effects of lower doses of CEEs only or CEEs-MPA on spine and hip BMD , total body bone mineral content ( BMC ) , and biochemical markers of bone turnover in postmenopausal women . DESIGN AND SETTING Two-year r and omized , double-blind , placebo-controlled sub study of the Women 's Health , Osteoporosis , Progestin , Estrogen trial , conducted at 19 US centers between August 1995 and October 2000 . PARTICIPANTS Eight hundred twenty-two healthy postmenopausal women aged 40 to 65 years who were within 4 years of their last menstrual period . INTERVENTIONS Patients were r and omly assigned to receive CEEs , 0.625 ; CEEs , 0.625 and MPA , 2.5 ; CEEs , 0.45 ; CEEs , 0.45 and MPA , 2.5 ; CEEs , 0.45 and MPA , 1.5 ; CEEs , 0.3 ; CEEs 0.3 and MPA , 1.5 ( all doses in mg/d ) ; or placebo for 2 years . All participants also received elemental calcium at 600 mg/d . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Changes from baseline in spine and total hip BMD , total body BMC , and biochemical markers of bone turnover ( serum osteocalcin and urinary cross-linked N-telopeptides of type I collagen ) , assessed at 6-month intervals and compared among treatment groups with a modified intention-to-treat approach . RESULTS At 24 months , women assigned to all of the active treatment groups had significant gains from baseline ( P<.001 ) in spine and hip BMD and total body BMC ( except total body BMC in the group receiving CEEs , 0.3 mg/d ) . These changes were significantly different from those in the placebo group , in which losses of bone mass in spine and total body were evident over the course of the study ( P<.001 ) . The loss in hip BMD from baseline in the placebo group was significant at 18 ( P = .02 ) but not at 24 months ( P = .06 ) . Osteocalcin and N-telopeptides of type I collagen were significantly reduced from baseline ( P<.001 ) for all active treatment groups at all time points ; no changes were found for the placebo group . For women treated with CEEs alone , the gains in spine BMD for the group taking CEEs , 0.625 mg/d , were significantly higher than those of the group taking CEEs , 0.3 mg/d ( P = .02 ) , but not the group treated with CEEs , 0.45 mg/d ( P = .48 ) . CONCLUSIONS Doses of CEEs or CEEs-MPA lower than 0.625 mg/d effectively increase BMD and BMC in early postmenopausal women
We found high quality evidence that hormone therapy in both primary and secondary prevention conferred no protective effects for all-cause mortality , cardiovascular death , non-fatal myocardial infa rct ion , angina , or revascularisation .
There was no strong evidence of effect on risk of stroke in this group .
Our review findings provide strong evidence that treatment with hormone therapy in post-menopausal women overall , for either primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease events has little if any benefit and causes an increase in the risk of stroke and venous thromboembolic events
BACKGROUND Evidence from systematic review s of observational studies suggests that hormone therapy may have beneficial effects in reducing the incidence of cardiovascular disease events in post-menopausal women , however the results of r and omised controlled trials ( RCTs ) have had mixed results .
This is an up date d version of a Cochrane review published in 2013 .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of hormone therapy for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in post-menopausal women , and whether there are differential effects between use in primary or secondary prevention .
Secondary aims were to undertake exploratory analyses to ( i ) assess the impact of time since menopause that treatment was commenced ( ≥ 10 years versus < 10 years ) , and where these data were not available , use age of trial participants at baseline as a proxy ( ≥ 60 years of age versus < 60 years of age ) ; and ( ii ) assess the effects of length of time on treatment .