Current data confirm that the 6MWT , ISWT and ESWT are valid , reliable and responsive to change with some interventions .
However , results are sensitive to small changes in methodology .
Field walking tests are commonly employed to evaluate exercise capacity , assess prognosis and evaluate treatment response in chronic respiratory diseases .
In recent years , there has been a wealth of new literature pertinent to the conduct of the 6-min walk test ( 6MWT ) , and a growing evidence base describing the incremental and endurance shuttle walk tests ( ISWT and ESWT , respectively ) .
The aim of this document is to describe the st and ard operating procedures for the 6MWT , ISWT and ESWT , which can be consistently employed by clinicians and research ers .
Course length of 30 metres versus 10 metres has a significant influence on six-minute walk distance in patients with COPD: an experimental crossover study.
QUESTIONS Do patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ( COPD ) achieve a different distance on the six minute walk test ( 6MWT ) conducted on a 10 m course versus on a 30 m course ? When assessing the distance on a 6MWT conducted on a 10 m course , is it valid to use existing reference equations that were generated on longer courses ? DESIGN A r and omised double-crossover experimental study . PARTICIPANTS Forty-five patients with COPD in primary physiotherapy care . INTERVENTION All patients performed a 6MWT twice over a 10 m course and twice over a 30 m course . The 6MWTs were performed in accordance with the American Thoracic Society guidelines . OUTCOME MEASURES 6MWD was assessed and predicted distance was calculated based on a range of reference equations . RESULTS The 6MWD on the 10 m course was 49.5 m shorter than on the 30 m course , which was statistically significant ( 95 % CI 39.4 to 59.6 ) . By using existing reference equations for a 6MWT conducted on the 10 m course , the predicted distance is highly overestimated ( with a range of 30 % to 33 % ) and the average distance as a percentage of the predicted value is 8%pred lower compared to a 6MWT conducted on the 30 m course , result ing in a worse representation of a COPD patient 's functional exercise capacity . CONCLUSION This study shows that the impact of course length on the 6MWD and on the use of reference equations in patients with COPD is substantial and clinical ly relevant ( based on the most conservative published minimum clinical ly important difference ) . Therefore , existing reference equations established for a 6MWT conducted over a 30 m ( or longer ) course can not be applied to predict the distance achieved on the 6MWT on a 10 m course , which is frequently used in primary care physiotherapy practice s for patients with COPD
Current data confirm that the 6MWT , ISWT and ESWT are valid , reliable and responsive to change with some interventions .
However , results are sensitive to small changes in methodology .
Field walking tests are commonly employed to evaluate exercise capacity , assess prognosis and evaluate treatment response in chronic respiratory diseases .
In recent years , there has been a wealth of new literature pertinent to the conduct of the 6-min walk test ( 6MWT ) , and a growing evidence base describing the incremental and endurance shuttle walk tests ( ISWT and ESWT , respectively ) .
The aim of this document is to describe the st and ard operating procedures for the 6MWT , ISWT and ESWT , which can be consistently employed by clinicians and research ers .