Conclusions Revisions and reoperations are more frequent and occur earlier with metal-on-metal hip resurfacing , except when discontinued devices are removed from the analyses .
Background Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing was developed for younger , active patients as an alternative to THA , but it remains controversial .
Study heterogeneity , inconsistent outcome definitions , and unst and ardized outcome measures challenge our ability to compare arthroplasty outcomes studies .
Questions / purpose sWe asked how early revisions or reoperations ( within 5 years of surgery ) and overall revisions , adverse events , and postoperative component malalignment compare among studies of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing with THA  among patients with hip osteoarthritis .
Secondarily , we compared the revision frequency identified in the systematic review with revisions reported in four major joint replacement registries .
Comparison of Total Hip Arthroplasty Performed with and without Cement: A Randomized Trial
Background : This study was design ed to compare the fixation of a Mallory-Head total hip prosthesis with and without cement . Methods : Two hundred and fifty patients with osteoarthritis of the hip were r and omized to receive a Mallory-Head total hip prosthesis design ed for insertion with cement or the same prosthesis design ed for insertion without cement . Neither the patient nor the outcomes assessor was aware of the type of prosthesis . Outcomes were assessed with respect to mortality , revision arthroplasty , health-related quality of life ( evaluated with the Harris hip score , Merle d'Aubigné and Postel hip score , McMaster-Toronto Arthritis Patient Preference Disability Question naire ( MACTAR ) , Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index ( WOMAC ) , and the time trade-off technique ) , and the six-minute-walk test . Patients were seen at three , six , and twelve months and yearly thereafter . Results : The prosthesis was inserted with cement in 124 patients and without cement in 126 patients . The mean age of the patients was sixty-four years , 48 % were female , and the mean duration of follow-up was 6.3 years . There were thirteen revisions in the group that had fixation with cement and six in the group that had fixation without cement ( p = 0.11 ) , and more femoral components were revised in the group that had fixation with cement ( twelve versus one ; p = 0.002 ) . All health-related quality -of-life measures improved postoperatively in both groups . Conclusions : In this r and omized trial , the group that had the cemented Mallory-Head hip prostheses required more revisions of the femoral component than did the group with the cementless Mallory-Head prostheses , which was perhaps related to the titanium-alloy femoral stem . Our findings are specific to the implants evaluated in this study
Conclusions Revisions and reoperations are more frequent and occur earlier with metal-on-metal hip resurfacing , except when discontinued devices are removed from the analyses .
Background Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing was developed for younger , active patients as an alternative to THA , but it remains controversial .
Study heterogeneity , inconsistent outcome definitions , and unst and ardized outcome measures challenge our ability to compare arthroplasty outcomes studies .
Questions / purpose sWe asked how early revisions or reoperations ( within 5 years of surgery ) and overall revisions , adverse events , and postoperative component malalignment compare among studies of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing with THA  among patients with hip osteoarthritis .
Secondarily , we compared the revision frequency identified in the systematic review with revisions reported in four major joint replacement registries .