There was low- to very low- quality evidence that other interventions were not effective in reducing work-related upper limb and neck MSDs in adults .
We found moderate- quality evidence to suggest that the use of arm support with alternative mouse may reduce the incidence of neck/shoulder MSDs , but not right upper limb MSDs .
Moreover , we found moderate- quality evidence to suggest that the incidence of neck/shoulder and right upper limb MSDs is not reduced when comparing alternative and conventional mouse with and without arm support .
However , given there were multiple comparisons made involving a number of interventions and outcomes , high- quality evidence is needed to determine the effectiveness of these interventions clearly .
While we found very-low- to low- quality evidence to suggest that other ergonomic interventions do not prevent work-related MSDs of the upper limb and neck , this was limited by the paucity and heterogeneity of available studies .
BACKGROUND Work-related upper limb and neck musculoskeletal disorders ( MSDs ) are one of the most common occupational disorders around the world .
Although ergonomic design and training are likely to reduce the risk of workers developing work-related upper limb and neck MSDs , the evidence is unclear .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of workplace ergonomic design or training interventions , or both , for the prevention of work-related upper limb and neck MSDs in adults .
The effect of forearm support on musculoskeletal discomfort during call centre work.
Using a computer keyboard with the forearms unsupported has been proposed as a causal factor for  neck/shoulder and arm/h and diagnoses . Recent laboratory and field studies have demonstrated that forearm support might be preferable to working in the traditional " floating " posture . The aim of this study was to determine whether providing forearm support when using a normal computer workstation would decrease musculoskeletal discomfort in intensive computer users in a call centre . A r and omised controlled study ( n = 59 ) , of 6 weeks duration was conducted . Thirty participants ( Group 1 ) were allocated to forearm support using the desk surface with the remainder ( Group 2 ) acting as a control group . At 6 weeks , the control group was also set up with forearm support . Both groups were then monitored for another 6 weeks . Question naires were used at 1 , 6 and 12 weeks to obtain information about discomfort , workstation setup , working posture and comfort .  Nine participants ( Group 1 n = 6 , Group 2 n = 3 ) withdrew within a week of commencing forearm support either due to discomfort or difficulty in maintaining the posture . At 6 weeks , the group using forearm support generated significantly fewer reports of discomfort in the neck and back , although the difference between the groups was not statistically significant . At 12 weeks , there were fewer reports of neck , back and wrist discomfort when preintervention discomfort was compared with post intervention discomfort . These findings indicate that for the majority of users , forearm support may be preferable to the " floating " posture implicit in current guidelines for computer workstation setup
There was low- to very low- quality evidence that other interventions were not effective in reducing work-related upper limb and neck MSDs in adults .
We found moderate- quality evidence to suggest that the use of arm support with alternative mouse may reduce the incidence of neck/shoulder MSDs , but not right upper limb MSDs .
Moreover , we found moderate- quality evidence to suggest that the incidence of neck/shoulder and right upper limb MSDs is not reduced when comparing alternative and conventional mouse with and without arm support .
However , given there were multiple comparisons made involving a number of interventions and outcomes , high- quality evidence is needed to determine the effectiveness of these interventions clearly .
While we found very-low- to low- quality evidence to suggest that other ergonomic interventions do not prevent work-related MSDs of the upper limb and neck , this was limited by the paucity and heterogeneity of available studies .
BACKGROUND Work-related upper limb and neck musculoskeletal disorders ( MSDs ) are one of the most common occupational disorders around the world .
Although ergonomic design and training are likely to reduce the risk of workers developing work-related upper limb and neck MSDs , the evidence is unclear .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of workplace ergonomic design or training interventions , or both , for the prevention of work-related upper limb and neck MSDs in adults .