A pattern of consistent evolution in fast-track protocol s was clearly demonstrated and these have shown variations in the core-identified components across the studies .
In the future incremental gains through focused improvements in key components will lend itself to even better postoperative outcomes and patient experience during oesophageal cancer treatment
Fast track is a st and ardised goal directed patient 's care pathway that aims to facilitate recovery following surgery .
Currently , there are large variations in the fast track protocol s used in oesophagectomy due to the complexity of the procedure .
The objective of this systematic review is to assess the evolution of fast track protocol s  following oesophagectomy  since its implementation and the result ing effect on postoperative outcomes .
The effect of formalizing enhanced recovery after esophagectomy with a protocol.
Enhanced recovery after surgery ( ERAS ) pathways aim to accelerate functional return and discharge from hospital . They have proven effective in many forms of surgery , most notably colorectal . However , experience in esophagectomy has been limited . A recent study reported significant reductions in pulmonary complications , mortality , and length of stay following the introduction of an ERAS protocol alone , without the introduction of any clinical changes . We instituted a similar change 16 months ago , introducing a protocol to provide a formal framework , for our existing postoperative care . This retrospective analysis compared outcome following esophagectomy for the 16 months before and 20 months after this change . Data were collected from prospect ively maintained secure web-based multidisciplinary data bases . Complication severity was classified using the Clavien-Dindo scale . Operative mortality was defined as death within 30 days of surgery , or at any point during the same hospital admission . Lower respiratory tract infection was defined as clinical evidence of infection , with or without radiological signs . Respiratory complications included lower respiratory tract infection , pleural effusion ( irrespective of drainage ) , pulmonary collapse , and pneumothorax . Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS v21 . One hundred thirty-two patients underwent esophagectomy ( 55 protocol group ; 77 before ) . All were performed open . There were no differences between the two groups in terms of age , gender , operation , use of neoadjuvant therapy , cell type , stage , tumor site , or American Society of Anesthesiologists grade . Median length of stay was 14.0 days ( protocol ) compared with 12.0 before ( interquartile range 9 - 19 and 9.5 - 15.5 , respectively ; P = 0.073 , Mann-Whitney U-test ) . Readmission within 30 days of discharge occurred in five ( 9.26 % ) and six ( 8.19 % ; P = 1.000 , Fisher 's exact test ) . There were four in-hospital deaths ( 3.03 % ) : one ( 1.82 % ) and three ( 3.90 % ) , respectively ( P = 0.641 ) . There were no differences in the severity of complications ( P = non-significant ; Pearson 's chi-squared ) . There were no differences in the type of complications occurring in either group . The protocol was completed successfully by 26 ( 47.3 % ) . No baseline factors were predictive of this . In contrast to previous studies , we did not demonstrate any improvement in outcome by formalizing our existing pathway using a written protocol . Consequently , improvements in short-term outcome from esophagectomy within ERAS would seem to be primarily due to improvements in components of perioperative care . Consequently , we would recommend that centers introducing new ( or review ing existing ) ERAS pathways for esophagectomy focus on optimizing clinical aspects of such st and ardized pathways
A pattern of consistent evolution in fast-track protocol s was clearly demonstrated and these have shown variations in the core-identified components across the studies .
In the future incremental gains through focused improvements in key components will lend itself to even better postoperative outcomes and patient experience during oesophageal cancer treatment
Fast track is a st and ardised goal directed patient 's care pathway that aims to facilitate recovery following surgery .
Currently , there are large variations in the fast track protocol s used in oesophagectomy due to the complexity of the procedure .
The objective of this systematic review is to assess the evolution of fast track protocol s  following oesophagectomy  since its implementation and the result ing effect on postoperative outcomes .