We did not find any differences between PSI and SI with respect to any other parameters .
Conclusions PSI  has advantages in axial alignment of the femoral component , operative time , and perioperative blood loss relative to SI .
No significant differences were found between PSI and SI with respect to alignment of the remaining components , number of outliers , or length of hospital stay .
Purpose The purpose of the present study was to compare patient-specific instrumentation ( PSI ) with st and ard instrumentation ( SI ) in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty ( TKA ) .
PSI is hypothesized to have advantages with respect to component alignment ; number of outliers ( defined as alignment > 3 ° from the target alignment ) ; operative time ; perioperative blood loss ; and length of hospital stay .
This new surgical technique is expected to exhibit superior performance .
Accuracy of manual instrumentation of tibial cutting guide in total knee arthroplasty
Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of conventional instrumentation for tibial resection in total knee arthroplasty ( TKA ) as assessed by a computer-based navigation system during each phase of the surgical procedure . The hypothesis is that conventional instrumentation fails to achieve optimal accuracy in final implant positioning , thus leading to surgical errors . Methods Forty primary TKAs were performed .  The resection guide was placed using an extramedullary guide . Accurate guide positioning was assessed by the navigation system prior to the osteotomy . The alignment measurement was repeated after resection and after component implantation in order to quantify the deviation caused by the manual positioning of the prosthetic components . A deviation ≥2 ° was considered unsatisfactory . Results In the frontal plane , unsatisfactory results observed were as follows : 15 % with reference to manual positioning of the resection guide and 10 % with reference to definition of the resection plane with a tendency towards varus malalignment . In the sagittal plane , unsatisfactory results were as follows : 45 % with reference to manual positioning of the resection guide and 40 % with reference to definition of the resection plane with a trend of decreased tibial slope angle . The deviation between bone resection and subsequent implant placement was ≥2 ° in none of the cases . Conclusions The study confirms the hypothesis that conventional instrumentation fails to achieve optimal accuracy in the positioning of the tibial component . During each phase of the surgical procedure , a tendency towards varus malalignment and a decreased tibial slope angle were observed . Levels of evidence II
We did not find any differences between PSI and SI with respect to any other parameters .
Conclusions PSI  has advantages in axial alignment of the femoral component , operative time , and perioperative blood loss relative to SI .
No significant differences were found between PSI and SI with respect to alignment of the remaining components , number of outliers , or length of hospital stay .
Purpose The purpose of the present study was to compare patient-specific instrumentation ( PSI ) with st and ard instrumentation ( SI ) in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty ( TKA ) .
PSI is hypothesized to have advantages with respect to component alignment ; number of outliers ( defined as alignment > 3 ° from the target alignment ) ; operative time ; perioperative blood loss ; and length of hospital stay .
This new surgical technique is expected to exhibit superior performance .