Research ers noted small improvements in body mass index immediately after the intervention was provided and at six months , along with improved weight post intervention .
Diabetes knowledge and self efficacy improved immediately following receipt of the intervention , and knowledge also at six months .
The intervention did not improve blood pressure .
Evidence is insufficient to show whether type 2 diabetes self management interventions for people with severe mental illness are effective in improving outcomes .
BACKGROUND People with severe mental illness are twice as likely to develop type 2 diabetes as those without severe mental illness .
Treatment guidelines for type 2 diabetes recommend that structured education should be integrated into routine care and should be offered to all .
However , for people with severe mental illness , physical health may be a low priority , and motivation to change may be limited .
These additional challenges mean that the findings reported in previous systematic review s of diabetes self management interventions may not be generalised to those with severe mental illness , and that tailored approaches to effective diabetes education may be required for this population .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of diabetes self management interventions specifically tailored for people with type 2 diabetes and severe mental illness .
Cost-effectiveness of systematic depression treatment among people with diabetes mellitus.
CONTEXT Depression co-occurring with diabetes mellitus is associated with higher health services costs , suggesting that more effective depression treatment might reduce use of other medical services . OBJECTIVE To evaluate the incremental cost and cost-effectiveness of a systematic depression treatment program among out patients with diabetes . DESIGN R and omized controlled trial comparing systematic depression treatment program with care as usual . SETTING Primary care clinics of group-model prepaid health plan . PATIENTS A 2-stage screening process identified 329 adults with diabetes and current depressive disorder . INTERVENTION Specialized nurses delivered a 12-month , stepped-care depression treatment program beginning with either problem-solving treatment psychotherapy or a structured antidepressant pharmacotherapy program . Subsequent treatment ( combining psychotherapy and medication , adjustments to medication , and specialty referral ) was adjusted according to clinical response . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Depressive symptoms were assessed by blinded telephone assessment s at 3 , 6 , 12 , and 24 months . Health service costs were assessed using health plan accounting records . RESULTS Over 24 months , patients assigned to the intervention accumulated a mean of 61 additional days free of depression ( 95 % confidence interval [ CI ] , 11 to 82 days ) and had outpatient health services costs that averaged $ 314 less ( 95 % CI , $ 1007 less to $ 379 more ) compared with patients continuing in usual care . When an additional day free of depression is valued at $ 10 , the net economic benefit of the intervention is $ 952 per patient treated ( 95 % CI , $ 244 to $ 1660 ) . CONCLUSIONS For adults with diabetes , systematic depression treatment significantly increases time free of depression and appears to have significant economic benefits from the health plan perspective . Depression screening and systematic depression treatment should become routine components of diabetes care
Research ers noted small improvements in body mass index immediately after the intervention was provided and at six months , along with improved weight post intervention .
Diabetes knowledge and self efficacy improved immediately following receipt of the intervention , and knowledge also at six months .
The intervention did not improve blood pressure .
Evidence is insufficient to show whether type 2 diabetes self management interventions for people with severe mental illness are effective in improving outcomes .
BACKGROUND People with severe mental illness are twice as likely to develop type 2 diabetes as those without severe mental illness .
Treatment guidelines for type 2 diabetes recommend that structured education should be integrated into routine care and should be offered to all .
However , for people with severe mental illness , physical health may be a low priority , and motivation to change may be limited .
These additional challenges mean that the findings reported in previous systematic review s of diabetes self management interventions may not be generalised to those with severe mental illness , and that tailored approaches to effective diabetes education may be required for this population .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of diabetes self management interventions specifically tailored for people with type 2 diabetes and severe mental illness .