Most of the outcome question naires had a mixed content reflecting various constructs such as pain and symptoms , sleep disturbances , psychological dysfunctions , physical impairments , and social functions .
STUDY DESIGN A systematic literature review of outcome question naires design ed for assessing functional status or disability in patients with low back pain .
OBJECTIVES To provide a comprehensive overview of all functioning/disability question naires used in recent years and to explore how the main concept(s ) was described or defined in the original paper , the content or the domains of disability , and the measurement properties of the question naires .
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA A number of clinical tools design ed for evaluating the functional status of patients with low back pain have been developed .
Only a few have been review ed earlier , and there has been little focus on the content reflected in the question naires .
The Bournemouth Questionnaire: a short-form comprehensive outcome measure. I. Psychometric properties in back pain patients.
OBJECTIVE Develop and test a short-form comprehensive outcome measure for back pain . DESIGN Prospect i ve longitudinal study of 3 consecutive cohorts of back pain patients . SETTING Anglo-European College of Chiropractic outpatient clinic and several field chiropractic practice s. METHOD Domains judged important in the back pain model and responsive to clinical change were identified from the literature . Items were scored on an 11-point numerical rating scale . The instrument was psychometrically tested by use of those tests relevant to an evaluative measure . RESULTS Seven dimensions of the back pain model were included in the question naire . Having established face validity , the instrument was shown to demonstrate high internal consistency ( Cronbach 's alpha = 0.9 ) and good test-retest reliability ( ICC = 0.95 ) . All items were retained on the basis that they contributed to the overall score ( item-corrected total score correlations ) and to the instrument 's responsiveness to clinical change ( item change-corrected total change score correlations ) . The instrument demonstrated acceptable construct and longitudinal construct validity with established external measures . The effect size of the instrument was high ( 1.29 ) and comparable with established measures . CONCLUSION A reliable , valid , and responsive instrument has been developed for use in back pain patients . It is practical for use in investigations of both the efficacy and effectiveness of back pain treatments
Most of the outcome question naires had a mixed content reflecting various constructs such as pain and symptoms , sleep disturbances , psychological dysfunctions , physical impairments , and social functions .
STUDY DESIGN A systematic literature review of outcome question naires design ed for assessing functional status or disability in patients with low back pain .
OBJECTIVES To provide a comprehensive overview of all functioning/disability question naires used in recent years and to explore how the main concept(s ) was described or defined in the original paper , the content or the domains of disability , and the measurement properties of the question naires .
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA A number of clinical tools design ed for evaluating the functional status of patients with low back pain have been developed .
Only a few have been review ed earlier , and there has been little focus on the content reflected in the question naires .