It is likely that investments at the social context level will also help to decrease the development of barriers at the organisational context level , especially by increasing staff involvement and satisfaction .
Background Integrated care interventions for chronic conditions can lead to improved outcomes , but it is not clear when and why this is the case .
This study aims to answer the following two research questions : First , what are the context , mechanisms and outcomes of integrated care for people with type 2 diabetes ?
Second , what are the relationships between context , mechanisms and outcomes of integrated care for people with type 2 diabetes ?
The science of improvement.
IN THE EARLY 1890S , DR WILLIAM HALSTED DEVELOPED radical mastectomy for breast cancer . Surgeons performed the Halsted procedure for more than 80 years even though there was little systematic evidence for its success . Then a new breed of scholars subjected the procedure to formal methods of evaluation unknown to Halsted . The methods —r and omized controlled trials ( RCTs ) principal among them — led to a surprise : radical mastectomy had no advantage over simpler forms of treatment . This is but 1 example of the hard-won victory of evidence over belief in medicine . The pioneers of the formal evaluation of medical practice s raised questions that traditional practitioners did not welcome . But in time , formal evaluation prevailed . The pioneers developed a hierarchy of evidentiary rigor relating the design of a study to the confidence that could be placed in the findings , from the lowly , nearly valueless anecdote to the royalty of evidence , the RCT . Concurrently , a similar story of hard-won learning unfolded in the so-called quality movement . Scholars illuminated the scale and types of defects in the processes of care and the outcomes , including high rates of unscientific care , inappropriate care , geographic variations in practice , latent disagreements among specialists , and oftenunrecognized medical injury to patients . Like the pioneers of evidence -based medicine , students of medical quality were at first largely ignored , but no longer . In 1999 and 2001 , the Institute of Medicine published 2 l and mark reports on the evidence for quality failures and called urgently for re design of care systems to achieve improvements . The story could end here happily with 2 great streams of endeavor merging into a framework for conjoint action : improving clinical evidence and improving the process of care . Instead , the 2 endeavors are often in unhappy tension . Neither disputes that progress toward health care ’s main goal , the relief of illness and pain , requires research of many kinds : basic , clinical , systems , epidemiologic . The disagreement centers on epistemology — ways to get at “ truth ” and how those ways should vary depending on the knowledge sought . Individuals most involved in day-to-day improvement work fear that if “ evidence ” is too narrowly defined and the approach to gathering evidence too severely constrained , progress may be the victim . For example , the RCT is a powerful , perhaps unequaled , research design to explore the efficacy of conceptually neat components of clinical practice —tests , drugs , and procedures . For other crucially important learning purpose s , however , it serves less well . Recent controversies about the evaluation of rapid response  teams  provide a case in point . These controversies show the importance of adjusting research methods to fit research questions . Although only 10 % to 15 % of in patients resuscitated outside intensive care units survive to hospital discharge , early warning signs are present in a large percentage of patients who ultimately experience cardiac arrest .  Rapid response team systems bring expert clinicians to the bedsides of deteriorating patients before arrest occurs . In the mid 1990s , based largely on reports from Australian investigators , the Institute for Healthcare Improvement and others began introducing the concept to willing hospitals . Local experience strongly suggested that these systems often , although not always , were associated with improved outcomes , including reduced anxiety among nursing staff ; increased interdisciplinary teamwork ; decreased cardiac arrests outside of intensive care units ; and , in some cases , declines in mortality . The evidence base took a turn in June 2005 with the publication of the Medical Early Response Intervention and Therapy ( MERIT ) Study , a cluster r and omized prospect i ve trial that cl aim ed to find no beneficial effect of these teams on several primary outcomes . Controversy has continued since then regarding the scientific evidence for rapid response systems . In fact , the MERIT trial was not negative ; it was inconclusive . The study team encountered an array of serious problems in execution , common in social science . For example , although the study ’s power calculation assumed a baseline rate of 30 events per 1000 admissions , the actual rate proved to be fewer than 7 events per 1000 admissions ; thus , the study was ef fect ively underpowered by 500 % . Crosscontamination abounded ; some control hospitals implemented rapid response protocol s , and several study
It is likely that investments at the social context level will also help to decrease the development of barriers at the organisational context level , especially by increasing staff involvement and satisfaction .
Background Integrated care interventions for chronic conditions can lead to improved outcomes , but it is not clear when and why this is the case .
This study aims to answer the following two research questions : First , what are the context , mechanisms and outcomes of integrated care for people with type 2 diabetes ?
Second , what are the relationships between context , mechanisms and outcomes of integrated care for people with type 2 diabetes ?