Active surveillance represents a viable option in men with low-risk PCa and a long life expectancy .
A biopsy progression indicates the need for active intervention , whereas the role of PSA doubling time is controversial .
In men with locally advanced PCa for whom local therapy is not m and atory , watchful waiting ( WW ) is a treatment alternative to and rogen-deprivation therapy ( ADT ) , with equivalent oncologic efficacy .
Active treatment is recommended mostly for patients with localized disease and a long life expectancy , with radical prostatectomy ( RP ) shown to be superior to WW in prospect i ve r and omized trials .
Nerve-sparing RP is the approach of choice in organ-confined disease , while neoadjuvant ADT provides no improvement in outcome variables .
For locally advanced disease , adjuvant ADT for 3 yr results in superior rates for disease-specific and overall survival and is the treatment of choice .
Active surveillance is an option in low-risk PCa and watchful waiting is an alternative to and rogen-deprivation therapy in locally advanced PCa not requiring immediate local treatment .
CONTEXT The most recent summary of the European Association of Urology ( EAU ) guidelines on prostate cancer ( PCa ) was published in 2011 .
OBJECTIVE To present a summary of the 2013 version of the EAU guidelines on screening , diagnosis , and local treatment with curative intent of clinical ly organ-confined PCa .
Current evidence is insufficient to warrant widespread population -based screening by prostate-specific antigen ( PSA ) for PCa .
Systematic prostate biopsies under ultrasound guidance and local anesthesia are the preferred diagnostic method .
CONCLUSIONS Knowledge in the field of PCa is rapidly changing .
Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial.
BACKGROUND The effect of screening with prostate-specific-antigen ( PSA ) testing and digital rectal examination on the rate of death from prostate cancer is unknown . This is the first report from the Prostate , Lung , Colorectal , and Ovarian ( PLCO ) Cancer Screening Trial on prostate-cancer mortality . METHODS From 1993 through 2001 , we r and omly assigned 76,693 men at 10 U.S. study centers to receive either annual screening ( 38,343 subjects ) or usual care as the control ( 38,350 subjects ) . Men in the screening group were offered annual PSA testing for 6 years and digital rectal examination for 4 years . The subjects and health care providers received the results and decided on the type of follow-up evaluation . Usual care sometimes included screening , as some organizations have recommended . The numbers of all cancers and deaths and causes of death were ascertained . RESULTS In the screening group , rates of compliance were 85 % for PSA testing and 86 % for digital rectal examination . Rates of screening in the control group increased from 40 % in the first year to 52 % in the sixth year for PSA testing and ranged from 41 to 46 % for digital rectal examination . After 7 years of follow-up , the incidence of prostate cancer per 10,000 person-years was 116 ( 2820 cancers ) in the screening group and 95 ( 2322 cancers ) in the control group ( rate ratio , 1.22 ; 95 % confidence interval [ CI ] , 1.16 to 1.29 ) . The incidence of death per 10,000 person-years was 2.0 ( 50 deaths ) in the screening group and 1.7 ( 44 deaths ) in the control group ( rate ratio , 1.13 ; 95 % CI , 0.75 to 1.70 ) . The data at 10 years were 67 % complete and consistent with these overall findings . CONCLUSIONS After 7 to 10 years of follow-up , the rate of death from prostate cancer was very low and did not differ significantly between the two study groups . ( Clinical Trials.gov number , NCT00002540 .
Active surveillance represents a viable option in men with low-risk PCa and a long life expectancy .
A biopsy progression indicates the need for active intervention , whereas the role of PSA doubling time is controversial .
In men with locally advanced PCa for whom local therapy is not m and atory , watchful waiting ( WW ) is a treatment alternative to and rogen-deprivation therapy ( ADT ) , with equivalent oncologic efficacy .
Active treatment is recommended mostly for patients with localized disease and a long life expectancy , with radical prostatectomy ( RP ) shown to be superior to WW in prospect i ve r and omized trials .
Nerve-sparing RP is the approach of choice in organ-confined disease , while neoadjuvant ADT provides no improvement in outcome variables .
For locally advanced disease , adjuvant ADT for 3 yr results in superior rates for disease-specific and overall survival and is the treatment of choice .
Active surveillance is an option in low-risk PCa and watchful waiting is an alternative to and rogen-deprivation therapy in locally advanced PCa not requiring immediate local treatment .
CONTEXT The most recent summary of the European Association of Urology ( EAU ) guidelines on prostate cancer ( PCa ) was published in 2011 .
OBJECTIVE To present a summary of the 2013 version of the EAU guidelines on screening , diagnosis , and local treatment with curative intent of clinical ly organ-confined PCa .
Current evidence is insufficient to warrant widespread population -based screening by prostate-specific antigen ( PSA ) for PCa .
Systematic prostate biopsies under ultrasound guidance and local anesthesia are the preferred diagnostic method .
CONCLUSIONS Knowledge in the field of PCa is rapidly changing .