Scores values tended to decrease postoperatively .
The comparison between haemorrhoidal treatments is still unclear .
Attempts have been made to adopt a unifying postoperative scoring system and thus ensure adequate comparison between clinical trials .
We aim ed to systematic ally review the available outcome scores of haemorrhoidal treatment .
Does a more extensive mucosal excision prevent haemorrhoidal recurrence after stapled haemorrhoidopexy? Long‐term outcome of a randomized controlled trial
AIM The study aim ed in a multicentric r and omized controlled trial to define the role of a more extensive mucosal resection on recurrence of mucosal prolapse in patients with Stage III haemorrhoids undergoing stapled haemorrhoidopexy .  METHOD In all , 135 patients were r and omized to treatment with a PPH-01/03 ( Ethicon EndoSurgery ) or an EEA ( Covidien ) stapler .  They were review ed after a minimum follow-up of 4 years to determine the rate of recurrent mucosal prolapse and general condition ( wellness evaluation score ) . Postoperative bowel dysfunction was assessed using the Rome III criteria . RESULTS Eighty-seven ( 65 % ) of the 135 patients ( 48 in the EEA stapler group and 37 in the PPH group ) were available for long-term follow-up . The two groups were comparable for age , gender and duration of follow-up ( mean 49.3 ± 5.4 months and 49.0 ± 5.3 months respectively ) . In the EEA group , 11 ( 23 % ) patients had some degree of recurrent prolapse compared with 12 ( 32 % ) in the PPH group ( P = 0.409 ) . Persistence of anal bleeding was significantly higher in the PPH group ( P = 0.04 ) while the postoperative Haemorrhoid Symptom Score was significantly better in the EEA group ( 1.73 ± 1.65 vs 3.17 ± 1.94 , P < 0.001 ) . The wellness evaluation score was significantly better in the EEA group ( 1.2 ± 1.27 vs 0.6 ± 1.0 , P = 0.028 ) . Furthermore , 7 ( 15 % ) of the patients in the EEA group complained of some evacuation disturbance compared with 13 ( 36 % ) in the PPH group ( P = 0.021 ) . CONCLUSION The study failed to demonstrate any significant difference in the long-term recurrence rate of Stage III haemorrhoids using EEA or PPH . Nevertheless , use of the larger volume EEA provides better symptom resolution compared with PPH
Scores values tended to decrease postoperatively .
The comparison between haemorrhoidal treatments is still unclear .
Attempts have been made to adopt a unifying postoperative scoring system and thus ensure adequate comparison between clinical trials .
We aim ed to systematic ally review the available outcome scores of haemorrhoidal treatment .