Preliminary work from this review suggests that exercise intervention compared with usual care both pre and post-surgery is associated with improved cardiopulmonary exercise capacity , increased muscle strength and reduced fatigue , post-operative complications and hospital length of stay .
BACKGROUND Surgery remains the best curative option for appropriately selected patients with lung cancer .
Evidence suggests that improving cardiovascular fitness and functional capacity can accelerate post-surgery recovery and reduce mortality .
However , the effect of exercise intervention for patients surgically treated for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer [ NCSLC ] has not been fully examined .
PURPOSE This review examines the literature regarding exercise intervention for patients who are surgically treated for NSCLC focussing on three key areas : method ological quality , intervention design ( e.g. duration , frequency , type ) and outcomes measured .
Preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation before lung cancer resection: results from two randomized studies.
Complete surgical resection is the most effective curative treatment for lung cancer . However , many patients with lung cancer also have severe COPD which increases their risk of postoperative complications and their likelihood of being considered " inoperable . " Preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation ( PR ) has been proposed as an intervention to decrease surgical morbidity but there is no established protocol and no r and omized study has been published to date . We tested two preoperative PR interventions in patients undergoing lung cancer resection and with moderate-severe COPD in a r and omized single blinded design . Outcomes were length of hospital stay and postoperative complications . The first study tested 4 weeks of guideline -based PR vs. usual care : that study proved to be very difficult to recruit as patients and providers were reluctant to delay surgery . Nine patients were r and omized and no differences were found between arms . The second study tested ten preoperative PR sessions using a customized protocol with nonst and ard components ( exercise prescription based on self efficacy , inspiratory muscle training , and the practice of slow breathing ) ( n=10 ) vs. usual care ( n=9 ) . The PR arm had shorter length of hospital stay by 3 days ( p=0.058 ) , fewer prolonged chest tubes ( 11 % vs. 63 % , p=0.03 ) and fewer days needing a chest tube ( 8.8 vs. 4.3 days p=0.04 ) compared to the controlled arm . A ten-session preoperative PR intervention may improve post operative lung reexpansion evidence d by shorter chest tube times and decrease the length of hospital stay , a crude estimator of post operative morbidity and costs . Our results suggest the potential for short term preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation interventions in patients with moderate-severe COPD undergoing curative lung resection . 4 weeks of conventional preoperative PR seems non feasible
Preliminary work from this review suggests that exercise intervention compared with usual care both pre and post-surgery is associated with improved cardiopulmonary exercise capacity , increased muscle strength and reduced fatigue , post-operative complications and hospital length of stay .
BACKGROUND Surgery remains the best curative option for appropriately selected patients with lung cancer .
Evidence suggests that improving cardiovascular fitness and functional capacity can accelerate post-surgery recovery and reduce mortality .
However , the effect of exercise intervention for patients surgically treated for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer [ NCSLC ] has not been fully examined .
PURPOSE This review examines the literature regarding exercise intervention for patients who are surgically treated for NSCLC focussing on three key areas : method ological quality , intervention design ( e.g. duration , frequency , type ) and outcomes measured .