We found inconsistent evidence that the use of an arm support or an alternative mouse may or may not reduce the incidence of neck or shoulder MSDs .
For other physical ergonomic interventions there is no evidence of an effect .
For organisational interventions , in the form of supplementary breaks , there is very low- quality evidence of an effect on upper limb discomfort .
For training and multifaceted interventions there is no evidence of an effect on upper limb pain or discomfort .
BACKGROUND Work-related upper limb and neck musculoskeletal disorders ( MSDs ) are one of the most common occupational disorders worldwide .
Studies have shown that the percentage of office workers that suffer from MSDs ranges from 20 to 60 per cent .
The direct and indirect costs of work-related upper limb MSDs have been reported to be high in Europe , Australia , and the United States .
Although ergonomic interventions are likely to reduce the risk of office workers developing work-related upper limb and neck MSDs , the evidence is unclear .
This is an up date of a Cochrane Review which was last published in 2012 .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of physical , cognitive and organisational ergonomic interventions , or combinations of those interventions for the prevention of work-related upper limb and neck MSDs among office workers .
A randomised controlled trial evaluating an alternative mouse and forearm support on upper body discomfort and musculoskeletal disorders among engineers
Objectives : The aim of this intervention study was to determine the effects of an alternative mouse and /or a forearm support board on the change in upper body discomfort scores and the development of incident musculoskeletal disorders . Methods : This r and omised controlled intervention trial followed 206 engineers for one year . Participants were r and omised to receive ( 1 ) a conventional mouse only , ( 2 ) an alternative mouse only , ( 3 ) a forearm support board , or ( 4 ) an alternative mouse plus forearm support board . Outcome measures included weekly upper body discomfort scores and incident musculoskeletal disorders . Results : During the study , 42 participants were diagnosed with an incident musculoskeletal disorder . The group that received the forearm support board experienced a reduction in their right upper extremity discomfort ( beta-coefficient −0.35 , 95 % CI −0.67 to −0.03 ) in comparison to those who did not receive a forearm board . The group that received the alternative mouse had a protective , but non-significant ( p = 0.20 ) , effect on incident cases of right upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders ( HR 0.57 , 95 % CI 0.24 to 1.34 ) and a non-significant reduction in neck/shoulder discomfort ( beta-coefficient −0.23 , 95 % CI −0.056 to 0.10 ) in comparison to those who received a conventional mouse . Conclusions : In engineers who use a computer for more than 20 h per week , a forearm support board may reduce right upper extremity discomfort attributed to computer use
We found inconsistent evidence that the use of an arm support or an alternative mouse may or may not reduce the incidence of neck or shoulder MSDs .
For other physical ergonomic interventions there is no evidence of an effect .
For organisational interventions , in the form of supplementary breaks , there is very low- quality evidence of an effect on upper limb discomfort .
For training and multifaceted interventions there is no evidence of an effect on upper limb pain or discomfort .
BACKGROUND Work-related upper limb and neck musculoskeletal disorders ( MSDs ) are one of the most common occupational disorders worldwide .
Studies have shown that the percentage of office workers that suffer from MSDs ranges from 20 to 60 per cent .
The direct and indirect costs of work-related upper limb MSDs have been reported to be high in Europe , Australia , and the United States .
Although ergonomic interventions are likely to reduce the risk of office workers developing work-related upper limb and neck MSDs , the evidence is unclear .
This is an up date of a Cochrane Review which was last published in 2012 .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of physical , cognitive and organisational ergonomic interventions , or combinations of those interventions for the prevention of work-related upper limb and neck MSDs among office workers .