In particular , there is little evidence that the identified tools would be good at detecting change in intervention studies .
The obvious gaps in available outcome measurement include well-being and participation outcomes for children , and family quality -of-life outcomes , domains particularly valued by our informants ( young people with ASD and parents ) .
This is the first systematic review of the quality and appropriateness of tools design ed to monitor progress and outcomes of young children with ASD .
BACKGROUND The needs of children with autism spectrum disorder ( ASD ) are complex and this is reflected in the number and diversity of outcomes assessed and measurement tools used to collect evidence about children 's progress .
Relevant outcomes include improvement in core ASD impairments , such as communication , social awareness , sensory sensitivities and repetitiveness ; skills such as social functioning and play ; participation outcomes such as social inclusion ; and parent and family impact .
OBJECTIVES To examine the measurement properties of tools used to measure progress and outcomes in children with ASD up to the age of 6 years .
To identify outcome areas regarded as important by people with ASD and parents .
Clinical assessment of autism in high-risk 18-month-olds
Earlier intervention improves outcomes for children with autism spectrum disorders ( ASDs ) , but existing identification tools are at the limits of st and ardization with 18-month-olds . We assessed potential behavioural markers of ASD at 18 months in a high-risk cohort of infant siblings of children with ASD . Prospect i ve data were collected using the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule ( ADOS ) and Autism Observation Scale for Infants ( AOSI ) on 155 infant siblings and 73 low-risk controls at 18 months . Infants were classified into three groups ( ASD sibs , non-ASD sibs , controls ) based on blind best-estimate diagnosis at age 3 . Fisher 's exact tests , followed by discriminant function analyses , revealed that the majority of informative ADOS items came from the social and behavioural domains , and AOSI items measuring behavioural reactivity and motor control contributed additional information . Findings highlight the importance of considering not only social-communication deficits , but also basic dimensions of temperament including state regulation and motor control when assessing toddlers with suspected ASD
In particular , there is little evidence that the identified tools would be good at detecting change in intervention studies .
The obvious gaps in available outcome measurement include well-being and participation outcomes for children , and family quality -of-life outcomes , domains particularly valued by our informants ( young people with ASD and parents ) .
This is the first systematic review of the quality and appropriateness of tools design ed to monitor progress and outcomes of young children with ASD .
BACKGROUND The needs of children with autism spectrum disorder ( ASD ) are complex and this is reflected in the number and diversity of outcomes assessed and measurement tools used to collect evidence about children 's progress .
Relevant outcomes include improvement in core ASD impairments , such as communication , social awareness , sensory sensitivities and repetitiveness ; skills such as social functioning and play ; participation outcomes such as social inclusion ; and parent and family impact .
OBJECTIVES To examine the measurement properties of tools used to measure progress and outcomes in children with ASD up to the age of 6 years .
To identify outcome areas regarded as important by people with ASD and parents .