Educational interventions did not seem to have a positive impact on HbA1c , systolic blood pressure or lipid profiles .
The use of telemedicine , clinician reminders and feedback showed mixed results but there was a level of consistency in improvement in HbA1c when multifaceted interventions on multidisciplinary teams were implemented .
Targeting general or family physicians was largely ineffective in improving the cardiovascular risk factors considered , except when using a computer application on insulin h and ling of type 2 diabetes or customised simulated cases with feedbacks .
Similarly , interventions targeting nurses did not improve outcomes compared to st and ard care .
Multifaceted professional interventions were more effective than single interventions targeting single primary or community care professionals in improving glycaemic control
OBJECTIVE To review the interventions targeting primary care or community based professionals on glycaemic and cardiovascular risk factor control in people with diabetes .
Caring for Poorly Controlled Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized Pharmacist Intervention
BACKGROUND : There is limited information from r and omized controlled studies about the influence of pharmacist interventions on diabetes control . OBJECTIVE : To evaluate the effect of a pharmacist intervention on improving diabetes control ; secondary endpoints were medication appropriateness and self-reported adherence . METHODS : A r and omized , controlled , multi-clinic trial was conducted in the University of Washington Medicine Neighborhood Clinics . Seventy-seven subjects , ⩾18 years old with a hemoglobin ( Hb ) A1c ⩾9 % at baseline and taking at least one oral diabetes medication , were r and omized to receive a pharmacist intervention ( n = 43 ) or usual care ( n = 34 ) for 6 months followed by a 6-month usual-care observation period for both groups . Subjects met with a clinical pharmacist to establish and initiate a diabetes care plan followed by weekly visits or telephone calls to facilitate diabetes management and adherence . HbA1c , medication appropriateness , and self-reported adherence were assessed at baseline , 6 months , and 12 months . RESULTS : The mean HbA1c did not differ between groups over the 12-month period ( p = 0.61 ) . A reduction in HbA1c was noted for both groups over time compared with baseline ( p = 0.001 ) ; however , control subjects relied more heavily on provider visits . Medication appropriateness was not improved for diabetes medications ( p = 0.65 ) . Self-reported adherence was not significantly improved by the intervention . CONCLUSIONS : This pharmacist intervention did not significantly improve diabetes control , but did allow for similar HbA1c control with fewer physician visits . Medication appropriateness and self-reported adherence compared with usual care in individuals with poorly controlled diabetes were not changed
Educational interventions did not seem to have a positive impact on HbA1c , systolic blood pressure or lipid profiles .
The use of telemedicine , clinician reminders and feedback showed mixed results but there was a level of consistency in improvement in HbA1c when multifaceted interventions on multidisciplinary teams were implemented .
Targeting general or family physicians was largely ineffective in improving the cardiovascular risk factors considered , except when using a computer application on insulin h and ling of type 2 diabetes or customised simulated cases with feedbacks .
Similarly , interventions targeting nurses did not improve outcomes compared to st and ard care .
Multifaceted professional interventions were more effective than single interventions targeting single primary or community care professionals in improving glycaemic control
OBJECTIVE To review the interventions targeting primary care or community based professionals on glycaemic and cardiovascular risk factor control in people with diabetes .