There is limited evidence to suggest which ablation method was the best .
There is limited evidence to suggest that CA may be a better treatment option compared to medical therapies in the management of persistent AF .
This review was also unable to recommend the best CA method
BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia seen in cardiovascular departments .
Treatments include medical interventions and catheter ablation .
Due to uncertainties in medical therapies for AF , and the need to continue sinus rhythm , ablation has been recently considered as a viable alternative .
Many new ablation methods based on pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) have been developed .
OBJECTIVES The primary objective of this review was to assess the beneficial and harmful effects of  catheter ablation ( CA ) in comparison with medical treatment in patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF .
The secondary objective was to determine the best regimen of CA .
Catheter Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Segmental Pulmonary Vein Ostial Ablation Versus Left Atrial Ablation
Background —Segmental ostial catheter ablation ( SOCA ) to isolate the pulmonary veins ( PVs ) and left atrial catheter ablation ( LACA ) to encircle the PVs both may eliminate paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ( PAF ) .  The relative efficacy of these 2 techniques has not been directly compared . Methods and Results —Of 80 consecutive patients with symptomatic PAF ( age , 52±10 years ) , 40 patients underwent  PV isolation by SOCA and 40 patients underwent LACA to encircle the PVs . During SOCA , ostial PV potentials recorded with a ring catheter were targeted . LACA was performed by encircling the left- and right-sided PVs 1 to 2 cm from the ostia and was guided by an electroanatomic mapping system ; ablation lines also were created in the mitral isthmus and posterior left atrium . The mean procedure and fluoroscopy times were 156±45 and 50±17 minutes for SOCA and 149±33 and 39±12 minutes for LACA , respectively . At 6 months , 67 % of patients who underwent SOCA and 88 % of patients who underwent LACA  were free of symptomatic PAF when not taking antiarrhythmic drug therapy ( P = 0.02 ) . Among the variables of age , sex , duration and frequency of PAF , ejection fraction , left atrial size , structural heart disease , and the ablation technique , only an increased left atrial size and the SOCA  technique were independent predictors of recurrent PAF . The only complication was left atrial flutter in a patient who underwent LACA . Conclusions —In patients undergoing catheter ablation for PAF  , LACA to encircle the PVs is more effective than SOCA
There is limited evidence to suggest which ablation method was the best .
There is limited evidence to suggest that CA may be a better treatment option compared to medical therapies in the management of persistent AF .
This review was also unable to recommend the best CA method
BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia seen in cardiovascular departments .
Treatments include medical interventions and catheter ablation .
Due to uncertainties in medical therapies for AF , and the need to continue sinus rhythm , ablation has been recently considered as a viable alternative .
Many new ablation methods based on pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) have been developed .
OBJECTIVES The primary objective of this review was to assess the beneficial and harmful effects of  catheter ablation ( CA ) in comparison with medical treatment in patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF .
The secondary objective was to determine the best regimen of CA .