CONCLUSION Despite recent large trials showing no significant effect , in patients that have experienced a TIA or stroke , blood pressure lowering agents reduced the occurrence of subsequent stroke and cardiovascular events .
The rate of myocardial infa rct ion and all-cause mortality was unchanged
BACKGROUND While hypertension is a leading risk factor for an initial stroke , the role of blood pressure lowering to prevent subsequent stroke is less clear .
The results of recent large clinical trials investigating effects of antihypertensive agents in patients with a history of stroke have not shown a significant benefit ; findings that are at odds with previous data .
Our meta- analysis systematic ally evaluates the available , relevant trials to examine the role of antihypertensive drugs in preventing recurrent stroke .
Outcomes in subgroups of hypertensive patients treated with regimens based on valsartan and amlodipine: an analysis of findings from the VALUE trial
Background In the Valsartan Antihypertensive Long-term Use Evaluation ( VALUE ) trial the primary outcome ( cardiac morbidity and mortality ) did not differ between valsartan and amlodipine-based treatment groups , although systolic blood pressure ( SBP ) and diastolic blood pressure reductions were significantly more pronounced with amlodipine . Stroke incidence was non-significantly , and myocardial infa rct ion was significantly lower in the amlodipine-based regimen , whereas cardiac failure was non-significantly lower on valsartan . Objectives The study protocol specified additional analyses of the primary endpoint according to : sex ; age ; race ; geographical region ; smoking status ; type 2 diabetes ; total cholesterol ; left ventricular hypertrophy ; proteinuria ; serum creatinine ; a history of coronary heart disease ; a history of stroke or transient ischemic attack ; and a history of peripheral artery disease . Additional subgroups were isolated systolic hypertension and classes of antihypertensive agents used immediately before r and omization . Methods The 15 245 hypertensive patients participating in VALUE were divided into subgroups according to baseline characteristics . Treatment by subgroup interaction analyses were carried out by a Cox proportional hazard model . Within each subgroup , treatment effects were assessed by hazard ratios and 95 % confidence intervals . Results For cardiac mortality and morbidity , the only significant subgroup by treatment interaction was of sex ( P = 0.016 ) , with the hazard ratio indicating a relative excess of cardiac events with valsartan treatment in women but not in men , but SBP differences in favour of amlodipine were distinctly greater in women . No other subgroup showed a significant difference in the composite cardiac outcome between valsartan and amlodipine-based treatments . For secondary endpoints , a sex-related significant interaction was found for heart failure ( P < 0.0001 ) , with men but not women having a lower incidence of heart failure with valsartan . Conclusion As in the whole VALUE cohort , in no subgroup of patients were there differences in the incidence of the composite cardiac endpoint with valsartan and amlodipine-based treatments , despite a greater blood pressure decrease in the amlodipine group . The only exception was sex , in which the amlodipine-based regimen was more effective than valsartan in women , but not in men , whereas the valsartan regimen was more effective in preventing cardiac failure in men than in women
CONCLUSION Despite recent large trials showing no significant effect , in patients that have experienced a TIA or stroke , blood pressure lowering agents reduced the occurrence of subsequent stroke and cardiovascular events .
The rate of myocardial infa rct ion and all-cause mortality was unchanged
BACKGROUND While hypertension is a leading risk factor for an initial stroke , the role of blood pressure lowering to prevent subsequent stroke is less clear .
The results of recent large clinical trials investigating effects of antihypertensive agents in patients with a history of stroke have not shown a significant benefit ; findings that are at odds with previous data .
Our meta- analysis systematic ally evaluates the available , relevant trials to examine the role of antihypertensive drugs in preventing recurrent stroke .