Pool analyses indicated that CB ablation was more beneficial in terms of procedural time [ st and ard mean difference = −0.58 ; 95 % confidence interval ( CI ) , −0.85 to −0.30 ] , complications without phrenic nerve injury ( PNI ) [ odds ratio ( OR ) = 0.79 ; 95 % CI , 0.67–0.93 ; I2 = 16 % ] , and recrudescence ( OR = 0.83 ; 95 % CI , 0.70–0.97 ; I2 = 63 % ) for PAF ; however , the total complications of CB was higher than RF .
The subgroup analysis found that , compared with non-contact force radiofrequency ( non-CF-RF ) , both first-generation cryoballoon ( CB1 ) and second-generation cryoballoon ( CB2 ) ablation  could reduce complications with PNI , procedural time , and recrudescence .
However , the safety and efficacy of CB2 was similar to those of CF-RF .
Conclusion Available overall and subgroup data suggested that both CB1 and CB2 were more beneficial than RF ablation , and the main advantages were reflected in comparing them with non-CF-RF .
However , CF-RF and CB2 showed similar clinical benefits
Purpose The present systematic review and meta- analysis aim ed to assess and compare the safety and efficacy of radiofrequency ( RF ) and cryoballoon ( CB ) ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ( PAF ) .
RF and CB ablation are two frequently used methods for pulmonary vein isolation in PAF , but which is a better choice for PAF remains uncertain .
Mesh ablator vs. cryoballoon pulmonary vein ablation of symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: results of the MACPAF study.
AIMS Catheter ablation of the pulmonary veins ( PVs ) is a promising therapeutic approach for symptomatic atrial fibrillation ( AF ) . The prospect i ve r and omized single-centre study ' Mesh Ablator versus Cryoballoon Pulmonary Vein Ablation of Symptomatic Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation ' ( MACPAF ; clinical trials.gov NCT01061931 ) compared the efficacy and safety of two balloon-based PV ablation systems . METHODS AND RESULTS Thirty-two patients underwent PV ablation for symptomatic paroxysmal AF using the A rct ic Front ® or the HD Mesh Ablator ® catheter  according to study protocol . The primary endpoint was complete PV isolation ( PVI ) at the end of the ablation procedure , determined by exit block after achieving entrance block . Long-term follow-up data are not included in this publication . Patients ' mean age was 61.7 ± 8.9 years , 43.2 % were female , and median CHA₂DS₂-VASc score was 2.0 . In the intention-to-treat analysis , the rate of the primary endpoint was 56.5 % in patients r and omized to the A rct ic Front ® and 9.5 % in patients r and omized to the HD Mesh Ablator ® catheter ( P = 0.001 ) . In the per- protocol analysis , complete PVI was achieved in 13 ( 76.5 % ) of 17 A rct ic Front ® patients but in none of the 15 HD Mesh Ablator ® patients ( P < 0.0001 ) . There were one major and two minor complications in each study arm but no clinical ly evident stroke . Post-procedural AF recurrence was detected within hospital stay in two ( 11.8 % ) A rct ic Front ® patients and in seven ( 46.7 % ) HD Mesh Ablator ® patients ( P = 0.049 ) . CONCLUSION The MACPAF study revealed a superiority of the A rct ic Front ® catheter concerning complete PVI . Owing to the insufficient efficacy of the HD Mesh Ablator ® catheter , the safety board decided to stop MACPAF prematurely
Pool analyses indicated that CB ablation was more beneficial in terms of procedural time [ st and ard mean difference = −0.58 ; 95 % confidence interval ( CI ) , −0.85 to −0.30 ] , complications without phrenic nerve injury ( PNI ) [ odds ratio ( OR ) = 0.79 ; 95 % CI , 0.67–0.93 ; I2 = 16 % ] , and recrudescence ( OR = 0.83 ; 95 % CI , 0.70–0.97 ; I2 = 63 % ) for PAF ; however , the total complications of CB was higher than RF .
The subgroup analysis found that , compared with non-contact force radiofrequency ( non-CF-RF ) , both first-generation cryoballoon ( CB1 ) and second-generation cryoballoon ( CB2 ) ablation  could reduce complications with PNI , procedural time , and recrudescence .
However , the safety and efficacy of CB2 was similar to those of CF-RF .
Conclusion Available overall and subgroup data suggested that both CB1 and CB2 were more beneficial than RF ablation , and the main advantages were reflected in comparing them with non-CF-RF .
However , CF-RF and CB2 showed similar clinical benefits
Purpose The present systematic review and meta- analysis aim ed to assess and compare the safety and efficacy of radiofrequency ( RF ) and cryoballoon ( CB ) ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ( PAF ) .
RF and CB ablation are two frequently used methods for pulmonary vein isolation in PAF , but which is a better choice for PAF remains uncertain .