Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
Effect of postoperative physical training on activity after curative surgery for non-small cell lung cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of a combined hospital plus home exercise programme following curative surgery for non-small cell lung cancer ( NSCLC ) . DESIGN R and omised controlled trial . SETTING Teaching hospital . PARTICIPANTS One hundred and thirty-one subjects with NSCLC admitted for curative surgery . INTERVENTIONS Participants were r and omised to usual care or a hospital plus home exercise programme . OUTCOMES The primary outcome was the between-group difference in physical activity 4 weeks after surgery . Secondary outcomes were the difference in quadriceps strength , exercise tolerance and quality of life [ Short Form-36 ( SF-36 ) and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer ( EORTC ) QLQ-LC13 ] from pre-operatively ( baseline ) to 4 weeks after surgery . RESULTS The participants ( n=131 ) had a mean age of 68 [ st and ard deviation ( SD ) 11 ] years and mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second of 2.4 ( SD 1.1)l . There were no significant differences in physical activity between the groups 4 weeks after surgery [ mean difference adjusted for baseline 12minutes/day , 95 % confidence interval ( CI ) -20.2 to 44.1 ] . In addition , there were no significant differences in total SF-36 or EORTC QLQ-LC13 scores from baseline to 4 weeks after surgery . Both groups had recovered their pre-operative walking distance 4 weeks after surgery , and there were no differences between the groups ( mean difference in Incremental Shuttle Walk Test from baseline to 4 weeks after surgery ( -26 m , 95 % CI -94.2 to 42.3 ) . CONCLUSIONS A hospital plus home exercise programme showed little benefit in unselected patients with NSCLC following surgery . Regardless of group allocation , the patients had recovered their pre-operative exercise tolerance levels by 4 weeks after surgery
Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?