Resistance training increased 6-minute walk distance compared to no training , but had no other benefits on cardiac function , exercise capacity , or quality of life if used alone or as an adjunct to aerobic training in people with chronic heart failure .
QUESTION Does resistance training , either alone or as an adjunct to aerobic training , improve cardiac function , exercise capacity and quality of life in people with chronic heart failure ?
Effects of aerobic or aerobic and resistance training on cardiorespiratory and skeletal muscle function in heart failure: a randomized controlled pilot trial
Objective : To examined the effects of different training modalities on exercise capacity ( Vo 2peak ) , systolic function , muscular strength and endurance and quality of life in heart failure patients . Design : R and omized controlled trial . Setting : Cardiac rehabilitation centre in Canada . Subjects : Forty-two individuals with heart failure ( 62 ± 12 years ; New York Heart Association ( NYHA ) classes I — III ) . Interventions : Aerobic training ( n = 14 ) , combined aerobic and resistance training ( n = 15 ) or usual care ( n = 13 ) three times per week for 12 weeks . Main measures : ( 1 ) Vo 2peak measured by symptom-limited grade d exercise test on cycle ergometer ; ( 2 ) systolic function assessed by two-dimensional echocardiography ; ( 3 ) muscular strength and muscular endurance measured by one-repetition maximum procedure ; and ( 4 ) quality of life assessed by question naires . Results : In the intention-to-treat analysis , neither aerobic nor combined aerobic and resistance training significantly improved Vo2peak , systolic function or quality of life compared with usual care . However , combined aerobic and resistance training significantly improved upper extremity strength ( 40.7 (14.0)—48.5 ( 16.0 ) kg , P<0.05 ) and muscular endurance ( 5.7 (2.7)—11.6 ( 7.6 ) reps , P<0.05 ) compared with aerobic training or usual care . In compliant participants ( exercise adherence 80 % ) , Vo2peak increased in the aerobic group ( 16.9 (6.0)—19.0 ( 6.8 ) , P= 0.026 ) and tended to increase in the combined training group ( 15.9 (5.0)—17.6 ( 5.6 ) , P= 0.058 ) compared with usual care . Quality of life was improved in the aerobic group only . Conclusions : Both aerobic and combined aerobic and resistance training are effective interventions to improve Vo2peak in compliant heart failure patients . Combined training may be more effective in improving muscle strength and endurance
Resistance training increased 6-minute walk distance compared to no training , but had no other benefits on cardiac function , exercise capacity , or quality of life if used alone or as an adjunct to aerobic training in people with chronic heart failure .
QUESTION Does resistance training , either alone or as an adjunct to aerobic training , improve cardiac function , exercise capacity and quality of life in people with chronic heart failure ?