AUTHORS ' CONCLUSIONS Very low quality evidence is available from single trials , thus we are uncertain if hip pre caution s with or without the addition of equipment and functional restrictions are effective in preventing dislocation and improving outcomes after THA .
BACKGROUND Total hip arthroplasty ( THA ) is one of the most common orthopaedic operations performed worldwide .
Painful osteoarthritis of the hip is the primary indication for THA .
Following THA , people have conventionally been provided with equipment , such as raised toilet seats and chairs , and educated to avoid activities that could cause the hip joint to be in a position of flexion over 90 degrees , or adduction or rotation past the midline .
These aspects of occupational therapy have been advocated to reduce the risks of prosthesis dislocation .
However , the appropriateness of these recommendations has been question ed .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of provision of assistive devices , education on hip pre caution s , environmental modifications and training in activities of daily living ( ADL ) and extended ADL ( EADL ) for people undergoing THA .
Evaluation of reducing postoperative hip precautions in total hip replacement: a randomized prospective study.
Currently , many rehabilitation protocol s for total hip replacements ( THRs ) include activity restrictions to prevent postoperative dislocation . There is increasing dem and for more efficient and safe rehabilitation protocol s. This r and omized prospect i ve study evaluates the need for hip restrictions following a modified anterolateral procedure . From 2004 to 2008 , 81 patients seeking elective THRs were r and omly assigned into a st and ard rehabilitation group or an early rehabilitation group . The st and ard group included restrictions to avoid hip flexion > 90 degrees and avoidance of riding in a car for the first postoperative month . The early group had no flexion or car riding restrictions . Forty-three patients were in the st and ard group and 38 patients were in the early group . There were no significant demographic differences between the 2 groups . All patients completed the Short Form 12- question Health Survey and Harris Hip Score preoperatively and at 4 weeks , 1 month , 3 months , and 1 year postoperatively . The time-points at which the patient first drove and ambulated with a cane , without a cane , and without a limp were also collected . No incidents of dislocation occurred . Patients in the early group were faster to ambulate with only a cane ( P=.03 ) , without a cane ( P<.001 ) , and without a limp ( P=.003 ) . They also drove earlier ( P=.02 ) . Pace of recovery was the only significant difference between the 2 groups . The early rehabilitation protocol increases the pace of recovery compared to a pathway with hip pre caution s without increasing complications
AUTHORS ' CONCLUSIONS Very low quality evidence is available from single trials , thus we are uncertain if hip pre caution s with or without the addition of equipment and functional restrictions are effective in preventing dislocation and improving outcomes after THA .
BACKGROUND Total hip arthroplasty ( THA ) is one of the most common orthopaedic operations performed worldwide .
Painful osteoarthritis of the hip is the primary indication for THA .
Following THA , people have conventionally been provided with equipment , such as raised toilet seats and chairs , and educated to avoid activities that could cause the hip joint to be in a position of flexion over 90 degrees , or adduction or rotation past the midline .
These aspects of occupational therapy have been advocated to reduce the risks of prosthesis dislocation .
However , the appropriateness of these recommendations has been question ed .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of provision of assistive devices , education on hip pre caution s , environmental modifications and training in activities of daily living ( ADL ) and extended ADL ( EADL ) for people undergoing THA .