In claudication patients , SE is more effective than UE at improving maximal walking and claudication distances , yet there is no difference in general quality of life or patient-reported community-based walking .
BACKGROUND Supervised exercise ( SE ) is widely accepted as an effective therapy for intermittent claudication ( IC ) , but its use is limited by cost .
Unsupervised exercise ( UE ) represents a less costly alternative .
We assessed the comparative effectiveness of SE vs UE in patients with IC .
Cost-effectiveness of exercise therapy in patients with intermittent claudication: supervised exercise therapy versus a 'go home and walk' advice.
OBJECTIVES The Exercise Therapy in Peripheral Arterial Disease ( EXITPAD ) study has shown supervised exercise therapy ( SET ) to be more effective regarding walking distance and quality of life than a ' go home and walk ' advice ( WA ) for patients with intermittent claudication . The present study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of SET versus WA . PATIENTS AND METHODS Data from the EXITPAD study , a 12-month r and omised controlled trial in 304 patients with claudication , was used to study the proportion of costs to walking distance and quality of life . Two different incremental cost-effectiveness ratios ( ICERs ) were calculated for SET versus WA : costs per extra metre on the treadmill test , and costs per quality -adjusted life year ( QALY ) . QALYs were based on utilities derived from the EuroQoL-5 dimensions ( EQ-5D ) . RESULTS Mean total costs were higher for SET than for WA ( 3407 versus 2304 Euros ) , mainly caused by the costs of exercise therapy . The median walking distance was 620 m for SET and 400 m for  WA . QALYs were 0.71 for SET and 0.67 for WA . All differences were statistically significant . The ICER for cost per extra metre on the 12-month treadmill test was € 4.08 . For cost per QALY , the ICER was € 28,693 . CONCLUSION At a willingness-to-pay threshold of € 40,000 per QALY , SET likely is a cost-effective therapeutic option for patients with claudication
In claudication patients , SE is more effective than UE at improving maximal walking and claudication distances , yet there is no difference in general quality of life or patient-reported community-based walking .
BACKGROUND Supervised exercise ( SE ) is widely accepted as an effective therapy for intermittent claudication ( IC ) , but its use is limited by cost .
Unsupervised exercise ( UE ) represents a less costly alternative .
We assessed the comparative effectiveness of SE vs UE in patients with IC .