There was low- to very low- quality evidence that other interventions were not effective in reducing work-related upper limb and neck MSDs in adults .
We found moderate- quality evidence to suggest that the use of arm support with alternative mouse may reduce the incidence of neck/shoulder MSDs , but not right upper limb MSDs .
Moreover , we found moderate- quality evidence to suggest that the incidence of neck/shoulder and right upper limb MSDs is not reduced when comparing alternative and conventional mouse with and without arm support .
However , given there were multiple comparisons made involving a number of interventions and outcomes , high- quality evidence is needed to determine the effectiveness of these interventions clearly .
While we found very-low- to low- quality evidence to suggest that other ergonomic interventions do not prevent work-related MSDs of the upper limb and neck , this was limited by the paucity and heterogeneity of available studies .
BACKGROUND Work-related upper limb and neck musculoskeletal disorders ( MSDs ) are one of the most common occupational disorders around the world .
Although ergonomic design and training are likely to reduce the risk of workers developing work-related upper limb and neck MSDs , the evidence is unclear .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of workplace ergonomic design or training interventions , or both , for the prevention of work-related upper limb and neck MSDs in adults .
Computer terminal work and the benefit of microbreaks.
Microbreaks are scheduled rest breaks taken to prevent the onset or progression of cumulative trauma disorders in the computerized workstation environment . The authors examined the benefit of microbreaks by investigating myoelectric signal ( MES ) behavior , perceived discomfort , and worker productivity while individuals performed their usual keying work . Participants were r and omly assigned to one of three experimental groups . Each participant provided data from working sessions where they took no breaks , and from working sessions where they took breaks according to their group assignment : microbreaks at their own discretion ( control ) , microbreaks at 20 min intervals , and microbreaks at 40 min intervals . Four main muscle areas were studied : the cervical extensors , the lumbar erector spinae , the upper trapezius/supraspinatus , and the wrist and finger extensors . The authors have previously shown that when computer workers remained seated at their workstation , the muscles performing sustained postural contractions displayed a cyclic trend in the mean frequency ( MNF ) of the MES ( McLean et al. , J. Electrophysiol . Kinesiol . 10 ( 1 ) ( 2000 ) 33 ) . The data provided evidence ( p < 0.05 ) that all microbreak protocol s were associated with a higher frequency of MNF cycling at the wrist extensors , at the neck when microbreaks were taken by the control and 40 min protocol groups , and at the back when breaks were taken by the 20 and 40 min protocol groups . No significant change in the frequency of MNF cycling was noted at the shoulder . It was determined ( p < 0.05 ) that microbreaks had a positive effect on reducing discomfort in all areas studied during computer terminal work , particularly when breaks were taken at 20 min intervals . Finally , microbreaks showed no evidence of a detrimental effect on worker productivity . The underlying cause of MNF cycling , and its relationship to the development of discomfort or cumulative trauma disorders remains to be determined
There was low- to very low- quality evidence that other interventions were not effective in reducing work-related upper limb and neck MSDs in adults .
We found moderate- quality evidence to suggest that the use of arm support with alternative mouse may reduce the incidence of neck/shoulder MSDs , but not right upper limb MSDs .
Moreover , we found moderate- quality evidence to suggest that the incidence of neck/shoulder and right upper limb MSDs is not reduced when comparing alternative and conventional mouse with and without arm support .
However , given there were multiple comparisons made involving a number of interventions and outcomes , high- quality evidence is needed to determine the effectiveness of these interventions clearly .
While we found very-low- to low- quality evidence to suggest that other ergonomic interventions do not prevent work-related MSDs of the upper limb and neck , this was limited by the paucity and heterogeneity of available studies .
BACKGROUND Work-related upper limb and neck musculoskeletal disorders ( MSDs ) are one of the most common occupational disorders around the world .
Although ergonomic design and training are likely to reduce the risk of workers developing work-related upper limb and neck MSDs , the evidence is unclear .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of workplace ergonomic design or training interventions , or both , for the prevention of work-related upper limb and neck MSDs in adults .