The analysis of our outcomes illustrates the similarities and differences between the identified tests
Assessment s of gait , balance , and transfer in elderly people play a valuable role in maintaining healthy aging and preventing a decline in mobility .
Several evaluation tools have been proposed ; however , clinicians should select the most accurate ones wisely , based on numerous criteria .
This systematic review aims to identify all applicable elderly mobility assessment tests and show their measurement properties with as much detail as possible .
The L test of functional mobility: measurement properties of a modified version of the timed "up & go" test designed for people with lower-limb amputations.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Walk tests provide essential outcome information when assessing ambulation of individuals with lower-limb amputation and a prosthetic device . Existing tests have limitations such as ceiling effects or insufficient challenge . The objective of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of data for a clinical measure of basic mobility , the L Test of Functional Mobility  ( L Test ) . SUBJECTS For this method ological study , 93 people with unilateral amputations ( 74 % transtibial , 26 % transfemoral ; 78 % male , 22 % female ; mean age=55.9 years ) were consecutively recruited from an outpatient clinic . Twenty-seven subjects returned for retesting . METHODS To assess concurrent validity , subjects completed the L Test , Timed " Up & Go " Test ( TUG ) , 10-Meter Walk Test , and 2-Minute Walk Test , followed by the Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale , Frenchay Activities Index ( FAI ) , and mobility subscale of the Prosthetic Evaluation Question naire ( PEQ-MS ) . Amputation cause and level , walking aid use , automatic stepping , and age variables were used to assess discriminant validity . RESULTS Intraclass correlation coefficients were .96 for interrater reliability and .97 for intrarater reliability , and minimal bias existed upon retesting . The magnitude of concurrent validity correlations ( r ) was very high between the L Test data and data for other walk tests and fair to moderate between the L Test data and data for self-report measures . The L Test discriminated between all groups as hypothesized . DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION The L Test is a 20-m test of basic mobility skills that includes 2 transfers and 4 turns . It demonstrated excellent measurement properties in this study
The analysis of our outcomes illustrates the similarities and differences between the identified tests
Assessment s of gait , balance , and transfer in elderly people play a valuable role in maintaining healthy aging and preventing a decline in mobility .
Several evaluation tools have been proposed ; however , clinicians should select the most accurate ones wisely , based on numerous criteria .
This systematic review aims to identify all applicable elderly mobility assessment tests and show their measurement properties with as much detail as possible .