There is limited evidence to suggest which ablation method was the best .
There is limited evidence to suggest that CA may be a better treatment option compared to medical therapies in the management of persistent AF .
This review was also unable to recommend the best CA method
BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia seen in cardiovascular departments .
Treatments include medical interventions and catheter ablation .
Due to uncertainties in medical therapies for AF , and the need to continue sinus rhythm , ablation has been recently considered as a viable alternative .
Many new ablation methods based on pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) have been developed .
OBJECTIVES The primary objective of this review was to assess the beneficial and harmful effects of  catheter ablation ( CA ) in comparison with medical treatment in patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF .
The secondary objective was to determine the best regimen of CA .
A randomized trial of circumferential pulmonary vein ablation versus antiarrhythmic drug therapy in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: the APAF Study.
OBJECTIVES We compared ablation strategy with antiarrhythmic drug therapy ( ADT ) in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ( PAF ) . BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) ablation strategy is superior to ADT in patients with an initial history of PAF , but its role in patients with a long history of AF as compared with ADT remains a challenge . METHODS One hundred ninety-eight patients ( age , 56 + /- 10 years ) with PAF of 6 + /- 5 years ' duration ( mean AF episodes 3.4/month ) who had failed ADT were r and omized to AF ablation by circumferential pulmonary vein ablation ( CPVA ) or to the maximum tolerable doses of another ADT , which included flecainide , sotalol , and amiodarone . Crossover to CPVA was allowed after 3 months of ADT . RESULTS By Kaplan-Meier analysis , 86 % of patients in the CPVA group and 22 % of those in the ADT group who did not require a second ADT were free from recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias ( AT ) ( p < 0.001 ) ; a repeat ablation was performed in 9 % of patients in the CPVA group for recurrent AF ( 6 % ) or atrial tachycardia ( 3 % ) . At 1 year , 93 % and 35 % of the CPVA and ADT groups , respectively , were AT-free . Ejection fraction , hypertension , and age independently predicted AF recurrences in the ADT group . Circumferential pulmonary vein ablation was associated with fewer cardiovascular hospitalizations ( p < 0.01 ) . One transient ischemic attack and 1 pericardial effusion occurred in the CPVA group ; side effects of ADT were observed in 23 patients . CONCLUSIONS Circumferential pulmonary vein ablation is more successful than ADT for prevention of PAF with few complications . Atrial fibrillation ablation warrants consideration in selected patients in whom ADT had already failed and maintenance of sinus rhythm is desired . ( A Controlled R and omized Trial of CPVA Versus Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy in for Paroxysmal AF : APAF/01 ; http:// clinical trials.gov/ct/show ; NCT00340314 )
There is limited evidence to suggest which ablation method was the best .
There is limited evidence to suggest that CA may be a better treatment option compared to medical therapies in the management of persistent AF .
This review was also unable to recommend the best CA method
BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia seen in cardiovascular departments .
Treatments include medical interventions and catheter ablation .
Due to uncertainties in medical therapies for AF , and the need to continue sinus rhythm , ablation has been recently considered as a viable alternative .
Many new ablation methods based on pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) have been developed .
OBJECTIVES The primary objective of this review was to assess the beneficial and harmful effects of  catheter ablation ( CA ) in comparison with medical treatment in patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF .
The secondary objective was to determine the best regimen of CA .