Available trial data do not provide evidence that advancing enteral feed volumes at daily increments of 15 to 20 mL/kg ( compared with 30 to 40 mL/kg ) reduces the risk of NEC or death in very preterm or VLBW infants , extremely preterm or ELBW infants , SGA or growth-restricted infants , or infants with antenatal AREDFV .
Advancing the volume of enteral feeds at a slow rate results in several days of delay in establishing full enteral feeds and may increase the risk of invasive infection
BACKGROUND Early enteral feeding practice s are potentially modifiable risk factors for necrotising enterocolitis ( NEC ) in very preterm or very low birth weight ( VLBW ) infants .
Observational studies suggest that conservative feeding regimens , including slowly advancing enteral feed volumes , reduce the risk of NEC .
However , slow feed advancement may delay establishment of full enteral feeding and may be associated with metabolic and infectious morbidities secondary to prolonged exposure to parenteral nutrition .
OBJECTIVES To determine effects of slow rates of enteral feed advancement on the incidence of NEC , mortality , and other morbidities in very preterm or VLBW infants .
Slow versus fast enteral feed advancement in very low birth weight infants: a randomized control trial.
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the tolerance of rapid advancement of enteral feeds in VLBW babies . SETTING Tertiary teaching hospital . DESIGN R and omized controlled trial . METHODS All stable neonates with birth weight less than 1250 grams were included in the study . The primary outcome variable was the time taken to achieve full enteral feeds ( defined as 180 ml/kg/day ) . The secondary outcome variables were incidence of Necrotizing enterocolitis ( NNEC ) and incidence of apnea . At 48 hours , the infants were r and omized into the slow advancement group ( enteral feeds advanced by increments of 15 ml/kg/day ) or fast advancement group ( enteral feeds advanced by increments of 30 ml/kg/day ) . The monitoring during feeding included daily weight record , two hourly abdominal girth charting , gastric aspirates , apnea , time taken to reach full enteral feedings and for NNEC . RESULTS There were 53 infants who were enrolled for the study ( 27 in the fast advancement group and 26 in the slow advancement group ) . In the fast advancement group , 20 percent completed the trial ; whereas 14 ( 53.8 percent ; ) in the slow advancement group completed the study . The two groups were comparable for birth weights , gestational age , sex , intrauterine growth status , Apgar and CRIB scores . The infants in the fast group reached full enteral intake of 180 ml/kg/day significantly earlier ( 10 + /- 1.8 days ) than in the slow group ( 14.8 + /- 1.5 days ) . The two groups were comparable for episodes of feed intolerance , apnea , NNEC . Infants in the fast group regained birth weight significantly earlier ( median 18 days ) than in the slow advancement group ( median 23 days ) . CONCLUSIONS Stable VLBW neonates can tolerate rapid advancements of enteral feeding without increased risk of adverse effects
Available trial data do not provide evidence that advancing enteral feed volumes at daily increments of 15 to 20 mL/kg ( compared with 30 to 40 mL/kg ) reduces the risk of NEC or death in very preterm or VLBW infants , extremely preterm or ELBW infants , SGA or growth-restricted infants , or infants with antenatal AREDFV .
Advancing the volume of enteral feeds at a slow rate results in several days of delay in establishing full enteral feeds and may increase the risk of invasive infection
BACKGROUND Early enteral feeding practice s are potentially modifiable risk factors for necrotising enterocolitis ( NEC ) in very preterm or very low birth weight ( VLBW ) infants .
Observational studies suggest that conservative feeding regimens , including slowly advancing enteral feed volumes , reduce the risk of NEC .
However , slow feed advancement may delay establishment of full enteral feeding and may be associated with metabolic and infectious morbidities secondary to prolonged exposure to parenteral nutrition .
OBJECTIVES To determine effects of slow rates of enteral feed advancement on the incidence of NEC , mortality , and other morbidities in very preterm or VLBW infants .