Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
Exercise prevents fatigue and improves quality of life in prostate cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy.
OBJECTIVE To show fatigue prevention and quality of life ( QOL ) improvement from cardiovascular exercise during  radiotherapy .  DESIGN Prospect i ve enrollment ( n=21 ) , r and omized to exercise ( n=11 ) and control groups ( n=10 ) , with pre- and post-radiotherapy between- and within-group comparisons . SETTING Academic medical center . PARTICIPANTS Localized prostate cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy . INTERVENTIONS The interventional group received radiotherapy plus aerobic exercise 3 times a week for 8 weeks whereas the control group received radiotherapy without exercise . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Pre- and post-radiotherapy differences in cardiac fitness , fatigue , depression , functional status , physical , social , and functional well-being , leg strength , and flexibility were examined within and between 2 groups . RESULTS No significant differences existed between 2 groups at pre-radiotherapy assessment . At post-radiotherapy assessment , the exercise group showed significant within group improvements in : cardiac fitness ( P<.001 ) , fatigue ( P=.02 ) , Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate ( FACT-P ) ( P=.04 ) , physical well-being ( P=.002 ) , social well-being ( P=.02 ) , flexibility ( P=.006 ) , and leg strength ( P=.000 ) . Within the control group , there was a significant increase in fatigue score ( P=.004 ) and a decline in social well-being ( P<.05 ) at post-radiotherapy assessment . Between-group differences at post-radiotherapy assessment were significant in cardiac fitness ( P=.006 ) , strength ( P=.000 ) , flexibility ( P<.01 ) , fatigue ( P<.001 ) , FACT-P ( P=.006 ) , physical well-being ( P<.001 ) , social well-being ( P=.002 ) , and functional well-being ( P=.04 ) . CONCLUSIONS An 8-week cardiovascular exercise program in patients with localized prostate cancer undergoing radiotherapy improved cardiovascular fitness , flexibility , muscle strength , and overall QOL and prevented fatigue
Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?