In many instances , no or minimal attempts to screen were undertaken or reported .
Background Subacromial shoulder pain is a common clinical presentation with much diagnostic uncertainty .
Some of this uncertainty relates to the involvement of the cervical spine as a source or contribution to subacromial shoulder pain .
Currently , there is no accepted method of screening of the cervical spine in the presence of subacromial shoulder pain , which risks patients receiving misguided and /or ineffective interventions .
Objective To evaluate approaches used to screen the cervical spine in patients with subacromial shoulder pain .
The effectiveness of low laser therapy in subacromial impingement syndrome: a randomized placebo controlled double‐blind prospective study
OBJECTIVES : Conflicting results were reported about the effectiveness of Low level laser therapy on musculoskeletal disorders . The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of 850‐nm gallium arsenide aluminum ( Ga‐As‐Al ) laser therapy on pain , range of motion and disability in subacromial impingement syndrome . METHODS : A total of 52 patients ( 33 females and 19 males with a mean age of 53.59±11.34 years ) with subacromial impingement syndrome were included . The patients were r and omly assigned into two groups . Group I ( n = 30 , laser group ) received laser therapy ( 5 joule/cm2 at each point over maximum 5‐6 painful points for 1 minute ) . Group II ( n = 22 , placebo laser group ) received placebo laser therapy . Initially cold pack ( 10 minutes ) was applied to all of the patients . Also patients were given an exercise program including range of motion , stretching and progressive resistive exercises . The therapy program was applied 5 times a week for 14 sessions . Pain severity was assessed by using visual analogue scale . Range of motion was measured by goniometer . Disability was evaluated by using Shoulder Pain and Disability Index . RESULTS : In group I , statistically significant improvements in pain severity , range of motion except internal and external rotation and SPADI scores were observed compared to baseline scores after the therapy ( p<0.05 ) . In Group II , all parameters except range of motion of external rotation were improved ( p<0.05 ) . However , no significant differences were recorded between the groups ( p>0.05 ) . CONCLUSIONS : The Low level laser therapy seems to have no superiority over placebo laser therapy in reducing pain severity , range of motion and functional disability
In many instances , no or minimal attempts to screen were undertaken or reported .
Background Subacromial shoulder pain is a common clinical presentation with much diagnostic uncertainty .
Some of this uncertainty relates to the involvement of the cervical spine as a source or contribution to subacromial shoulder pain .
Currently , there is no accepted method of screening of the cervical spine in the presence of subacromial shoulder pain , which risks patients receiving misguided and /or ineffective interventions .
Objective To evaluate approaches used to screen the cervical spine in patients with subacromial shoulder pain .