We found high quality evidence that hormone therapy in both primary and secondary prevention conferred no protective effects for all-cause mortality , cardiovascular death , non-fatal myocardial infa rct ion , angina , or revascularisation .
There was no strong evidence of effect on risk of stroke in this group .
Our review findings provide strong evidence that treatment with hormone therapy in post-menopausal women overall , for either primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease events has little if any benefit and causes an increase in the risk of stroke and venous thromboembolic events
BACKGROUND Evidence from systematic review s of observational studies suggests that hormone therapy may have beneficial effects in reducing the incidence of cardiovascular disease events in post-menopausal women , however the results of r and omised controlled trials ( RCTs ) have had mixed results .
This is an up date d version of a Cochrane review published in 2013 .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of hormone therapy for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in post-menopausal women , and whether there are differential effects between use in primary or secondary prevention .
Secondary aims were to undertake exploratory analyses to ( i ) assess the impact of time since menopause that treatment was commenced ( ≥ 10 years versus < 10 years ) , and where these data were not available , use age of trial participants at baseline as a proxy ( ≥ 60 years of age versus < 60 years of age ) ; and ( ii ) assess the effects of length of time on treatment .
Benefits and risks of postmenopausal hormone therapy when it is initiated soon after menopause.
The authors further analyzed results from the Women 's Health Initiative r and omized trials ( 1993 - 2004 ) of conjugated equine estrogens , with or without medroxyprogesterone acetate , focusing on health benefits versus risks among women who initiated hormone therapy soon after menopause . Data from the Women 's Health Initiative observational study ( 1993 - 2004 ) were included in some analyses for additional precision . Results are presented here for incident coronary heart disease , stroke , venous thromboembolism , breast cancer , colorectal cancer , endometrial cancer , or hip fracture ; death from other causes ; a summary global index ; total cancer ; and total mortality . Hazard ratios for breast cancer and total cancer were comparatively higher ( P < 0.05 ) among women who initiated hormone therapy soon after menopause , for both regimens . Among these women , use of conjugated equine estrogens appeared to produce elevations in venous thromboembolism and stroke and a reduction in hip fracture .  Estrogen plus progestin results among women who initiated use soon after menopause were similar for venous thromboembolism , stroke , and hip fracture but also included evidence of longer-term elevations in breast cancer , total cancer , and the global index . These analyses provide little support for the hypothesis of favorable effects among women who initiate postmenopausal estrogen use soon after menopause , either for coronary heart disease or for health benefits versus risk indices considered
We found high quality evidence that hormone therapy in both primary and secondary prevention conferred no protective effects for all-cause mortality , cardiovascular death , non-fatal myocardial infa rct ion , angina , or revascularisation .
There was no strong evidence of effect on risk of stroke in this group .
Our review findings provide strong evidence that treatment with hormone therapy in post-menopausal women overall , for either primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease events has little if any benefit and causes an increase in the risk of stroke and venous thromboembolic events
BACKGROUND Evidence from systematic review s of observational studies suggests that hormone therapy may have beneficial effects in reducing the incidence of cardiovascular disease events in post-menopausal women , however the results of r and omised controlled trials ( RCTs ) have had mixed results .
This is an up date d version of a Cochrane review published in 2013 .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of hormone therapy for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in post-menopausal women , and whether there are differential effects between use in primary or secondary prevention .
Secondary aims were to undertake exploratory analyses to ( i ) assess the impact of time since menopause that treatment was commenced ( ≥ 10 years versus < 10 years ) , and where these data were not available , use age of trial participants at baseline as a proxy ( ≥ 60 years of age versus < 60 years of age ) ; and ( ii ) assess the effects of length of time on treatment .