They have been shown to be valid , reliable , and responsive , with a low administration burden .
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to perform a st and ardized and systematic evaluation of the available evidence on multi-item shoulder-specific patient-reported outcome measures that are applicable to a wide spectrum of disorders .
A Self-Administered Questionnaire for Assessment of Symptoms and Function of the Shoulder*
A self-administered question naire was design ed to assess the severity of symptoms related to and the functional status of the shoulder . It includes domains of global assessment , pain , daily activities , recreational and athletic activities , work , satisfaction , and areas for improvement . Each domain is grade d separately and is weighted to arrive at the total score . The over-all scale and each domain were prospect ively tested for validity , reliability , and responsiveness to clinical change . One hundred patients who were seen for evaluation of the shoulder were enrolled in the study . The validity of the scale was demonstrated by moderate-to-high correlation of the domains and individual questions of the Shoulder Rating Question naire with those of the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales 2 . Validity was supported further by significant correlation of the scores in each domain with the level of satisfaction in that domain and by significantly lower scores in domains that patients selected as areas important for improvement . The over-all scale and each domain were internally consistent ( Cronbach alpha , 0.71 to 0.90 ) . Reproducibility was evaluated by repeated administration of the question naire after a mean of three days to forty patients whose condition was clinical ly stable . Reproducibility of the over-all question naire and individual domains was excellent ( Spearman-Brown index , 0.94 to 0.98 ) . Individual questions were reproducible , with a weighted kappa value of more than 0.7 for each . Responsiveness was evaluated by comparison of the preoperative and postoperative scores of thirty patients who had a satisfactory result one year after an operation on the shoulder . The over-all Shoulder Rating Question naire and each domain were responsive to clinical change as demonstrated by favorable st and ardized response means ( range , 1.1 to 1.9 ) and indices of responsiveness ( range , 1.1 to 2.0 ) . Similar analysis performed for individual diagnostic groups supported the validity , reliability , and responsiveness of the question naire in each group . The self-administered shoulder question naire was found to be valid , reliable , and responsive to clinical change . These qualities should make it a useful instrument for the prospect i ve assessment of the outcome of treatment of disorders related to the shoulder
They have been shown to be valid , reliable , and responsive , with a low administration burden .
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to perform a st and ardized and systematic evaluation of the available evidence on multi-item shoulder-specific patient-reported outcome measures that are applicable to a wide spectrum of disorders .