Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
Recovery of overall exercise ability, quality of life, and continence after 12-week combined exercise intervention in elderly patients who underwent radical prostatectomy: a randomized controlled study.
OBJECTIVE To examine the changes from a combined exercise intervention after radical prostatectomy ( RP ) in elderly patients with prostate cancer , because r and omized controlled trials addressing exercise intervention after RP have been lacking . METHODS From May 2009 to May 2010 , all patients who underwent laparoscopic RP were assessed for eligibility . A total of 66 patients were r and omized to an exercise or a control group . The exercise group received a combined exercise intervention ( resistance , flexibility , and Kegel exercises ) twice a week for 12 weeks , and the control group received only Kegel exercises . The primary outcome was physical function , and the secondary outcomes were continence status and quality of life after the exercise intervention . RESULTS A total of 49 patients completed follow-up to the end of study . After the 12-week exercise intervention , except for grip strength , all physical functions were better in the exercise group than in the control group . The 24-hour pad test results ( 12.2 g in the exercise group , 46.2 g in the control group ) and continence rate ( 73.1 % in exercise group , 43.5 % in the control group ) recovered more promptly in the exercise group . On a question naire study using the International Consultation on Incontinence question naire , Beck Depression Inventory , and Medical Outcomes Study 36-item short-form health survey , only the exercise group showed improvement at the last follow-up visit . CONCLUSION A 12-week combined exercise intervention after RP results in improvement of physical function , continence rate , and quality of life . These results could help with prompt recovery of daily activities
Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?