Serious adverse events were rare , and no serious events were reported to be directly related to the exercise programme .
This review provides evidence that PRT is an effective intervention for improving physical functioning in  older people , including improving strength and the performance of some simple and complex activities .
BACKGROUND Muscle weakness in old age is associated with physical function decline .
Progressive resistance strength training ( PRT ) exercises are design ed to increase strength .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of PRT on older people and identify adverse events .
High-Intensity Resistance Training Improves Muscle Strength, Self-Reported Function, and Disability in Long-Term Stroke Survivors
Background and Purpose — To evaluate the efficacy of supervised high-intensity progressive resistance training ( PRT ) on lower extremity strength , function , and disability in older , long-term stroke survivors . Methods — Forty-two volunteers aged 50 years and above , 6 months to 6 years after a single mild to moderate stroke , were r and omized into either a control group of upper extremity stretching or a PRT group that received a 12-week supervised high-intensity resistance training program consisting of bilateral leg press ( LP ) , unilateral paretic and nonparetic knee extension ( KE ) , ankle dorsiflexion ( DF ) , and plantarflexion ( PF ) exercises .  Functional performance was assessed using the 6-minute walk , stair-climb time , repeated chair-rise time , and habitual and maximal gait velocities . Self-reported changes in function and disability were evaluated using the Late Life Function and Disability Instrument ( LLFDI ) . Results — Single-repetition maximum strength significantly improved in the PRT group for LP ( 16.2 % ) , paretic KE ( 31.4 % ) , and nonparetic KE ( 38.2 % ) with no change in the control group . Paretic ankle DF ( 66.7 % versus −24.0 % ) , paretic ankle PF ( 35.5 % versus −20.3 % ) , and nonparetic ankle PF ( 14.7 % versus −13.8 % ) significantly improved in the PRT group compared with the control . The PRT group showed significant improvement in self-reported function and disability with no change in the control . There was no significant difference between groups for any performance-based measure of function . Conclusions — High-intensity PRT improves both paretic and nonparetic lower extremity strength after stroke , and results in reductions in functional limitations and disability
Serious adverse events were rare , and no serious events were reported to be directly related to the exercise programme .
This review provides evidence that PRT is an effective intervention for improving physical functioning in  older people , including improving strength and the performance of some simple and complex activities .
BACKGROUND Muscle weakness in old age is associated with physical function decline .
Progressive resistance strength training ( PRT ) exercises are design ed to increase strength .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of PRT on older people and identify adverse events .