In studies included in this meta- analysis , probiotic administration was associated with a reduction in NEC-related mortality
Aim of the study Probiotic administration to preterm infants has the potential to prevent necrotising enterocolitis ( NEC ) .
Data from r and omised controlled trials ( RCT ) are conflicting but meta-analyses seem to support this intervention .
To date , these analyses have not focused on surgical NEC .
We aim ed to determine the effect of probiotic administration  to preterm infants on prevention of surgical NEC .
Bacillus clausii for Prevention of Late-onset Sepsis in Preterm Infants: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY Preterm infants are managed with antibiotics for sepsis , including suspected or probable sepsis . This leads to a delayed and abnormal colonization of the gut with potentially pathogenic organisms and a microbiome , which lacks biodiversity and increases the risk for late-onset sepsis ( LOS ) . Probiotics have been proven to reduce the risk for necrotizing enterocolitis , but evidence for prevention of LOS is inconclusive . Probiotic effect depends also on the strain used , dose and indication for use . This study evaluated Bacillus clausii probiotic administered prophylactically to preterm neonates for prevention of LOS . OBJECTIVES To study B.clausii given prophylactically to preterm neonates for prevention of LOS . DESIGN Double-blinded , placebo-controlled , r and omized trial . SETTING S Tertiary care neonatal unit in India . PARTICIPANTS Consecutive preterm neonates < 34 weeks , admitted from 1 March 2012 to 28 February 2014 were stratified as extreme preterm and very preterm . INTERVENTION R and omized to receive either probiotic or placebo for 6 weeks , discharge from hospital , death or occurrence of sepsis , whichever was earlier . PRIMARY OUTCOME Incidence of definite and probable LOS in probiotic group compared with placebo . RESULTS Of 326 eligible preterm infants , 244 were enrolled and 82 were excluded . Of these , 120 were stratified as extreme preterm and r and omized to receive placebo ( n = 59 ) and probiotic ( n = 61 ) . Of 124 babies stratified as very preterm , an equal number was r and omized to receive placebo ( n = 62 ) and probiotic ( n = 62 ) . There was no significant difference in the incidence of LOS between the two arms in the extreme preterm group [ 29 % vs. 23 % ; relative risk ( RR ) 1.27 ; 95 % confidence interval ( CI ) 0.88 - 1.66 ; p = 0.36 ] and the very preterm group ( 13 % vs. 10 % ; RR 1.33 ; 95 % CI 0.96 - 1.70 ; p = 0.32 ) . Full feeds were achieved significantly faster in the probiotic group in both the extreme preterm ( RR 0.82 ; 95 % CI 0.74 - 0.88 ) and the very preterm ( RR 0.67 ; 95 % 0.32 - 0.77 ) . CONCLUSIONS Prophylactic administration of B.clausii to preterm neonates did not result in a significant difference in the incidence of LOS as compared with placebo
In studies included in this meta- analysis , probiotic administration was associated with a reduction in NEC-related mortality
Aim of the study Probiotic administration to preterm infants has the potential to prevent necrotising enterocolitis ( NEC ) .
Data from r and omised controlled trials ( RCT ) are conflicting but meta-analyses seem to support this intervention .
To date , these analyses have not focused on surgical NEC .
We aim ed to determine the effect of probiotic administration  to preterm infants on prevention of surgical NEC .