There is low to high ( majority moderate ) certainty for small improvements of unclear clinical importance in plasma glucose , triglycerides , and HDL concentrations favoring low-carbohydrate food at half of the prespecified time points .
There was little to no difference in LDL concentration or any of the secondary outcomes ( body weight , waist circumference , blood pressure , quality of life ) in response to either of the diets ( very-low- to high-certainty evidence ) .
Conclusions Currently available data provide low- to moderate-certainty evidence that dietary carbohydrate restriction to a maximum of 40 % yields slightly better metabolic control of uncertain clinical importance than reduction in fat to a maximum of 30 % in people with T2D .
Background It remains uncertain which diet is best for people with type 2 diabetes ( T2D ) .
Objective We compared the effects of dietary carbohydrate restriction with fat restriction on markers of metabolic syndrome and quality of life in people with T2D .
Long-Term Comparison of Three Dietary Prescriptions in the Treatment of NIDDM
OBJECTIVE To compare three sets of dietary guidelines for the treatment of non-insulin-dependent diabetes ( NIDDM ) in free-living individuals and to observe the effects on metabolic control over an 18-month period . RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Seventy volunteer subjects with NIDDM were r and omly assigned to one of three diets , a weight-management diet , a high-carbohydrate/fiber diet , or a modified-lipid diet and followed for 18 months . Nutrient intakes , weight , blood lipids , and glycemic control were measured . RESULTS In all diet groups , glycated hemoglobin ( HbA1 ) fell significantly before diet intervention began , remaining lower throughout the study and at follow-up 9 months later . Low-density lipoprotein ( LDL ) cholesterol showed a sustained fall in all groups after diet intervention . Apart from transient changes in high-density lipoprotein ( HDL ) cholesterol and triglyceride ( TG ) in the diet groups with the higher carbohydrate intake , no lasting differences were found between the three diet groups . CONCLUSIONS In the long term , there were few differences in the outcome of the three dietary prescriptions . Even with intensive instruction , participants found it difficult to meet recommended nutrient intakes ; however , specific dietary advice did result in an improvement in LDL cholesterol . Adverse changes in HDL cholesterol and TG because of diet intervention were transient . The significant improvement in glycemic control during the recruitment phase may have been the result of particpants ' previous dietary knowledge and the increased attention that they received during the intervention
There is low to high ( majority moderate ) certainty for small improvements of unclear clinical importance in plasma glucose , triglycerides , and HDL concentrations favoring low-carbohydrate food at half of the prespecified time points .
There was little to no difference in LDL concentration or any of the secondary outcomes ( body weight , waist circumference , blood pressure , quality of life ) in response to either of the diets ( very-low- to high-certainty evidence ) .
Conclusions Currently available data provide low- to moderate-certainty evidence that dietary carbohydrate restriction to a maximum of 40 % yields slightly better metabolic control of uncertain clinical importance than reduction in fat to a maximum of 30 % in people with T2D .
Background It remains uncertain which diet is best for people with type 2 diabetes ( T2D ) .
Objective We compared the effects of dietary carbohydrate restriction with fat restriction on markers of metabolic syndrome and quality of life in people with T2D .