Pool analyses indicated that CB ablation was more beneficial in terms of procedural time [ st and ard mean difference = −0.58 ; 95 % confidence interval ( CI ) , −0.85 to −0.30 ] , complications without phrenic nerve injury ( PNI ) [ odds ratio ( OR ) = 0.79 ; 95 % CI , 0.67–0.93 ; I2 = 16 % ] , and recrudescence ( OR = 0.83 ; 95 % CI , 0.70–0.97 ; I2 = 63 % ) for PAF ; however , the total complications of CB was higher than RF .
The subgroup analysis found that , compared with non-contact force radiofrequency ( non-CF-RF ) , both first-generation cryoballoon ( CB1 ) and second-generation cryoballoon ( CB2 ) ablation  could reduce complications with PNI , procedural time , and recrudescence .
However , the safety and efficacy of CB2 was similar to those of CF-RF .
Conclusion Available overall and subgroup data suggested that both CB1 and CB2 were more beneficial than RF ablation , and the main advantages were reflected in comparing them with non-CF-RF .
However , CF-RF and CB2 showed similar clinical benefits
Purpose The present systematic review and meta- analysis aim ed to assess and compare the safety and efficacy of radiofrequency ( RF ) and cryoballoon ( CB ) ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ( PAF ) .
RF and CB ablation are two frequently used methods for pulmonary vein isolation in PAF , but which is a better choice for PAF remains uncertain .
Cryoballoon versus radiofrequency catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
BACKGROUND Catheter ablation is an established treatment for atrial fibrillation ( AF ) .  Cryoballoon ablation ( CBA ) has emerged as an alternative to radiofrequency ablation ( RFA ) . However , there are few data comparing these modalities for treatment of paroxysmal AF ( pAF ) in the U.S. POPULATION The purpose of this study was to compare procedural times , safety , and efficacy of CBA against RFA . METHODS A single-center prospect i ve cohort study evaluated patients who underwent catheter ablation for pAF using CBA or RFA between January 1 , 2010 and October 31 , 2013 . Patients with prior ablation and those without rhythm follow-up for at least 3 months were excluded . The primary end point was freedom from AF , atrial flutter , and atrial tachycardia ( FFAF ) > 30 seconds after a 3-month blanking period without requirement for antiarrhythmic drugs . We also compared rates of successful pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) , fluoroscopy and procedure times , and major complication rates . RESULTS A total of 201 patients were included ( CBA = 101 , RFA = 100 ) . The rate of successful PVI was 99.3 % in CBA versus 97.4 % in RFA ( P = 0.08 ) . Procedure times were shorter with CBA ( 192.9 ± 44.0 minutes vs 283.7 ± 78.0 minutes , P < 0.001 ) as well as total fluoroscopy times ( 46.0 ± 22.4 minutes vs 73.0 ± 30.1 minutes , P < 0.001 ) . Overall complication rates were equivalent ; however , fewer cardiac perforations occurred with CBA ( 0 % vs 4 % , P = 0.042 ) . The 1-year FFAF rates were 60.3 % for CBA and 61.1 % for RFA ( log rank P = 0.93 ) . CONCLUSION CBA was associated with equivalent 1-year FFAF rate as RFA for pAF . Procedure and fluoroscopy times were shorter for CBA and fewer cardiac perforations occurred
Pool analyses indicated that CB ablation was more beneficial in terms of procedural time [ st and ard mean difference = −0.58 ; 95 % confidence interval ( CI ) , −0.85 to −0.30 ] , complications without phrenic nerve injury ( PNI ) [ odds ratio ( OR ) = 0.79 ; 95 % CI , 0.67–0.93 ; I2 = 16 % ] , and recrudescence ( OR = 0.83 ; 95 % CI , 0.70–0.97 ; I2 = 63 % ) for PAF ; however , the total complications of CB was higher than RF .
The subgroup analysis found that , compared with non-contact force radiofrequency ( non-CF-RF ) , both first-generation cryoballoon ( CB1 ) and second-generation cryoballoon ( CB2 ) ablation  could reduce complications with PNI , procedural time , and recrudescence .
However , the safety and efficacy of CB2 was similar to those of CF-RF .
Conclusion Available overall and subgroup data suggested that both CB1 and CB2 were more beneficial than RF ablation , and the main advantages were reflected in comparing them with non-CF-RF .
However , CF-RF and CB2 showed similar clinical benefits
Purpose The present systematic review and meta- analysis aim ed to assess and compare the safety and efficacy of radiofrequency ( RF ) and cryoballoon ( CB ) ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ( PAF ) .
RF and CB ablation are two frequently used methods for pulmonary vein isolation in PAF , but which is a better choice for PAF remains uncertain .