High-intensity interval training ( HIT ) with duration of 2 to 6 weeks seems to be the best exercise programme in a prehabilitation intervention but it exists heterogeneity in terms of intensity and duration .
Prehabilitation increase exercise capacity and significantly enhances pulmonary function .
But the reduction of postoperative complication and mortality has not been clearly demonstrated .
It seems that not all patients can benefit from prehabilitation and it could be indicated only in patients with impaired lung function .
Meanwhile , safety of prehabilitation and good results of some studies support this intervention in high-risk patients
Surgical resection remains the best treatment option for patients with early stage of non-small cell lung cancer ( NSCLC ) .
However , it may be responsible of postoperative complication and mortality , especially in patients with impaired pulmonary function .
Enhanced recovery after surgery ( ERAS ) programs have been focused mainly in minimal invasive surgery approach during lung resection and respiratory rehabilitation after surgery .
Preoperative exercise-based intervention ( prehabilitation ) has demonstrated reduction of morbi-mortality in other surgeries but in thoracic surgery continues to be under discussion .
Cardio-pulmonary exercise test ( CPET ) is the gold st and ard technique to predict postoperative morbi-mortality .
The implementation of a preoperative respiratory rehabilitation could optimize patient 's physical capacity before surgery and improve outcomes and enhance recovery .
The aim of this systematic review of the literature is to identify the effectiveness and safety of prehabilitation programs in thoracic surgery , the type of exercise and its duration , and the group of patients with best benefit .
Prehabilitation is a safe intervention without side effects in patients .
Effects of high-intensity interval training on pulmonary function
To determine whether high-intensity interval training ( HIT ) would increase respiratory muscle strength and expiratory flow rates more than endurance training ( ET ) , 15 physically active , healthy subjects ( untrained ) were r and omly assigned to an ET group ( n = 7 ) or a HIT group ( n = 8) . All subjects performed an incremental test to exhaustion ( VO2max ) on a cycle ergometer before and after training . St and ard pulmonary function tests , maximum inspiratory pressure ( PImax ) , maximum expiratory pressure ( PEmax ) , and maximal flow volume loops were performed pre training and after each week of training . HIT subjects performed a 4-week training program , 3 days a week , on a cycle ergometer at 90 % of their VO2max final workload , while the ET subjects performed exercise at 60–70 % VO2max . The HIT group performed five 1-min bouts with 3-min recovery periods and the ET group cycled for 45 min continuously . A five-mile time trial ( TT ) was performed prior to , after 2 weeks , and after completion of training . Both groups showed improvements ( P < 0.05 ) in VO2max ( ~8–10 % ) and TT ( HIT 6.5 ± 1.3 % , ET 4.4 ± 1.8 % ) following training with no difference ( P > 0.05 ) between groups . Both groups increased ( P < 0.05 ) PImax post training ( ET ~ 25 % , HIT ~ 43 % ) with values significantly higher for HIT than ET . There was no change ( P > 0.05 ) in expiratory flow rates with training in either group . These data suggest that both whole-body exercise training and HIT are effective in increasing inspiratory muscle strength with HIT offering a time-efficient alternative to ET in improving aerobic capacity and performance
High-intensity interval training ( HIT ) with duration of 2 to 6 weeks seems to be the best exercise programme in a prehabilitation intervention but it exists heterogeneity in terms of intensity and duration .
Prehabilitation increase exercise capacity and significantly enhances pulmonary function .
But the reduction of postoperative complication and mortality has not been clearly demonstrated .
It seems that not all patients can benefit from prehabilitation and it could be indicated only in patients with impaired lung function .
Meanwhile , safety of prehabilitation and good results of some studies support this intervention in high-risk patients
Surgical resection remains the best treatment option for patients with early stage of non-small cell lung cancer ( NSCLC ) .
However , it may be responsible of postoperative complication and mortality , especially in patients with impaired pulmonary function .
Enhanced recovery after surgery ( ERAS ) programs have been focused mainly in minimal invasive surgery approach during lung resection and respiratory rehabilitation after surgery .
Preoperative exercise-based intervention ( prehabilitation ) has demonstrated reduction of morbi-mortality in other surgeries but in thoracic surgery continues to be under discussion .
Cardio-pulmonary exercise test ( CPET ) is the gold st and ard technique to predict postoperative morbi-mortality .
The implementation of a preoperative respiratory rehabilitation could optimize patient 's physical capacity before surgery and improve outcomes and enhance recovery .
The aim of this systematic review of the literature is to identify the effectiveness and safety of prehabilitation programs in thoracic surgery , the type of exercise and its duration , and the group of patients with best benefit .
Prehabilitation is a safe intervention without side effects in patients .