We found that the size of the left atrium , presence of cardiovascular disease , and protocol s of amiodarone administration did not influence the magnitude of effect .
Serious adverse events were infrequent .
Amiodarone is effective for converting AF to sinus rhythm in a wide range of patients .
BACKGROUND Although clinicians sometimes choose amiodarone to convert atrial fibrillation ( AF ) to sinus rhythm , no current and comprehensive systematic review has summarized its effectiveness .
OBJECTIVE To review the effectiveness of amiodarone in converting AF to sinus rhythm over a 4-week period .
Intravenous amiodarone versus verapamil for acute conversion of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm.
Abstract Amiodarone and verapamil are well-known antiarrhythmic drugs used for treatment of ventricular and supraventricular arrhythmias . Although verapamil is the drug of choice for control of the atrioventricular node , it has also been reported to terminate atrial fibrillation . 1–3 Amiodarone has been used extensively for drug-refractory ventricular tachycardia but seldom for termination of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation . 4–6 To our knowledge , no comparative study with amiodarone and verapamil has been reported . Because of this , we compared the efficacy of intravenous amiodarone versus verapamil for conversion of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm in a single-blind r and omized study
We found that the size of the left atrium , presence of cardiovascular disease , and protocol s of amiodarone administration did not influence the magnitude of effect .
Serious adverse events were infrequent .
Amiodarone is effective for converting AF to sinus rhythm in a wide range of patients .
BACKGROUND Although clinicians sometimes choose amiodarone to convert atrial fibrillation ( AF ) to sinus rhythm , no current and comprehensive systematic review has summarized its effectiveness .
OBJECTIVE To review the effectiveness of amiodarone in converting AF to sinus rhythm over a 4-week period .