Results The consensus panel agreed on the following statements in patients with AF undergoing cardiac surgery concomitant surgical ablation : 1 .
Improves the achievement of sinus rhythm at discharge and 1 year ( level A ) ; this effect is sustained up to 5 years ( level B ) .
2 .
3 .
Does not increase the risk of perioperative mortality ( level A ) , stroke ( level A ) , myocardial infa rct ion ( level B ) , cardiac tamponade ( level A ) , reoperative bleeding ( level A ) , esophageal injury ( level B ) , low cardiac output ( level A ) , intraaortic balloon ( level B ) , congestive heart failure ( level B ) , ejection fraction ( EF ; level B ) , pleural effusion ( level A ) , pneumonia ( level A ) , renal dysfunction ( level B ) , and mediastinitis ( level A ) .
The incidence of esophageal injury remains to be low ( level B ) .
4 .
Does not reduce mortality at 1 year ( level A ) .
5 .
6 .
Increases cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp times ( level A ) , with no difference in intensive care unit and hospital length of stay ( level A ) .
Conclusions Given these evidence -based statements , the consensus panel stated that , in patients with persistent and permanent AF undergoing cardiac surgery , concomitant surgical ablation is recommended to increase incidence of sinus rhythm at short- and long-term follow-up ( class 1 , level A ) ; to reduce the risk of stroke and thromboembolic events ( class 2a , level B ) ; to improve EF ( class 2a , level A ) ; and to exercise tolerance ( class 2a , level A ) and long-term survival ( class 2a , level B )
Objective This purpose of this consensus conference was to determine whether surgical atrial fibrillation ( AF ) ablation during cardiac surgery improves clinical and re source outcomes compared with cardiac surgery alone in adults undergoing cardiac surgery for valve or coronary artery bypass grafting .
Left atrial radiofrequency ablation during cardiac surgery in patients with atrial fibrillation.
INTRODUCTION Intraoperative left atrial radiofrequency ( RF ) ablation recently has been suggested as an effective surgical treatment for atrial fibrillation ( AF ) . The aim of this study was to verify the outcome of this technique in a controlled multicenter trial . METHODS AND RESULTS One hundred three consecutive patients ( 39 men and 65 women ; age 62 + /- 11 years ) affected by AF underwent cardiac surgery and RF ablation in the left atrium ( RF group ) . The control group consisted of 27 patients ( 6 men and 21 women ; age 64 + /- 7 years ) with AF who underwent cardiac surgery during the same period and refused RF ablation .  Mitral valve disease was present in 89 ( 86 % ) and 25 ( 92 % ) patients , respectively ( P = NS ) . RF endocardial ablation was performed in order to obtain isolation of both right and left pulmonary veins , a lesion connecting the previous lines , and a lesion connecting the line encircling the left veins to the mitral annulus . Upon discharge from the hospital , sinus rhythm was present in 65 patients ( 63 % ) versus 5 patients ( 18 % ) in the control group ( P < 0.0001 ) . Mean time of cardiopulmonary bypass was longer in the RF group ( 148 + /- 50 min vs 117 + /- 30 min , P = 0.013 ) . The complication rate was similar in both groups , but RF ablation-related complications occurred in 4 RF group patients ( 3.9 % ) . After a mean follow-up of 12.5 + /- 5 months ( range 4 - 24 ) , 83 ( 81 % ) of 102 RF group patients were in stable sinus rhythm versus 3 ( 11 % ) of 27 in the control group ( P < 0.0001 ) . The success rate was similar among the four surgical centers . Atrial contraction was present in 66 ( 79.5 % ) of 83 patients in the RF group in sinus rhythm . CONCLUSION Endocardial RF left atrial compartmentalization during cardiac surgery is effective in restoring sinus rhythm in many patients . This technique is easy to perform and reproducible . Rare RF ablation-related complications can occur . During follow-up , sinus rhythm persistence is good , and biatrial contraction is preserved in most patients
Results The consensus panel agreed on the following statements in patients with AF undergoing cardiac surgery concomitant surgical ablation : 1 .
Improves the achievement of sinus rhythm at discharge and 1 year ( level A ) ; this effect is sustained up to 5 years ( level B ) .
2 .
3 .
Does not increase the risk of perioperative mortality ( level A ) , stroke ( level A ) , myocardial infa rct ion ( level B ) , cardiac tamponade ( level A ) , reoperative bleeding ( level A ) , esophageal injury ( level B ) , low cardiac output ( level A ) , intraaortic balloon ( level B ) , congestive heart failure ( level B ) , ejection fraction ( EF ; level B ) , pleural effusion ( level A ) , pneumonia ( level A ) , renal dysfunction ( level B ) , and mediastinitis ( level A ) .
The incidence of esophageal injury remains to be low ( level B ) .
4 .
Does not reduce mortality at 1 year ( level A ) .
5 .
6 .
Increases cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp times ( level A ) , with no difference in intensive care unit and hospital length of stay ( level A ) .
Conclusions Given these evidence -based statements , the consensus panel stated that , in patients with persistent and permanent AF undergoing cardiac surgery , concomitant surgical ablation is recommended to increase incidence of sinus rhythm at short- and long-term follow-up ( class 1 , level A ) ; to reduce the risk of stroke and thromboembolic events ( class 2a , level B ) ; to improve EF ( class 2a , level A ) ; and to exercise tolerance ( class 2a , level A ) and long-term survival ( class 2a , level B )
Objective This purpose of this consensus conference was to determine whether surgical atrial fibrillation ( AF ) ablation during cardiac surgery improves clinical and re source outcomes compared with cardiac surgery alone in adults undergoing cardiac surgery for valve or coronary artery bypass grafting .