This systematic review found robust data demonstrating that engagement in diabetes self-management education results in a statistically significant decrease in A1C levels .
PRACTICE IMPLICATION S The data suggest mode of delivery , hours of engagement , and baseline A1C can affect the likelihood of achieving statistically significant and clinical ly meaningful improvement in A1C
OBJECTIVE Assess effect of diabetes self-management education and support methods , providers , duration , and contact time on glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes .
Effectiveness of a community pharmacist intervention in diabetes care: a randomized controlled trial.
WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE There is little evidence from well- design ed r and omized controlled trials of the impact of community pharmacist intervention on the clinical management of patients with type 2 diabetes . It is also not known how sustainable any observed effects on glycaemic control are , over time . This study was initiated to address both these issues . METHODS A 6-month , r and omized , controlled parallel-group trial in 66 community pharmacies was conducted in Belgium . Patients were r and omly assigned to receive usual pharmacist care ( n = 135 ) or a predefined pharmacist intervention ( n = 153 ) . The intervention mainly focused on correct medication use , medication adherence and healthy lifestyle promotion . Primary outcome was glycaemic control , as measured by fasting plasma glucose and HbA1c . Sustainability of changes in glycaemic control was assessed by additional glucose measurements 18 months after the end of the study . RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The intervention significantly reduced HbA1c ( between-group difference : 0·5 % , P = 0.009 ) . The largest impact on HbA1c was observed when pharmacotherapy changes ( i.e. , type and /or dose of hypoglycaemic agents ) initiated by the physician were sustained with pharmaceutical care : HbA1c was reduced by 1·05 % in the intervention group , whose medication was changed , compared with a reduction of 0·02 % in the therapy-modification only , group . It was also found that the diabetes education program result ed in improved self-management and better knowledge of diabetes . Eighteen months after the end of the formal study period , the mean HbA1c of the intervention group did not differ significantly from the control group ( 7·4 % vs. 7·2 % ) . WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION This study provides new evidence , from a r and omized controlled trial , of the beneficial  effect of community pharmacist intervention in the clinical management of type 2 diabetic patients . However , questions remain about the sustainability of the observed improvements
This systematic review found robust data demonstrating that engagement in diabetes self-management education results in a statistically significant decrease in A1C levels .
PRACTICE IMPLICATION S The data suggest mode of delivery , hours of engagement , and baseline A1C can affect the likelihood of achieving statistically significant and clinical ly meaningful improvement in A1C
OBJECTIVE Assess effect of diabetes self-management education and support methods , providers , duration , and contact time on glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes .