Overall , there is little direct evidence for components of ERAS , with much derived from nonesophageal thoracoabdominal surgery .
ERAS in principle seems logical and safe for esophagectomy .
OBJECTIVE This article aims to provide the first systematic review of enhanced recovery after surgery ( ERAS ) programs for  esophagectomy  and generate guidelines .
BACKGROUND ERAS programs use multimodal approaches to reduce complications and accelerate recovery .
Although ERAS is well established in colorectal surgery , experience after esophagectomy has been minimal .
However , esophagectomy remains an extremely high-risk operation , commonly performed in patients with significant comorbidities .
Consequently , ERAS may have a significant role to play in improving outcomes .
No guidelines or review s have been published in esophagectomy .
Prevention of pulmonary complications after upper abdominal surgery by preoperative intensive inspiratory muscle training: a randomized controlled pilot study
Objective : To investigate the feasibility and effects of preoperative inspiratory muscle training on the incidence of atelectasis in patients at high risk of postoperative pulmonary complications scheduled for elective abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery . Design : Single-blind r and omized controlled pilot study . Setting : Gelderse Vallei Hospital Ede , the Netherl and s. Subjects : Twenty high-risk patients undergoing elective abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery were r and omly assigned to receive preoperative inspiratory muscle training or usual care . Main measures : Effectiveness outcome variables were atelectasis , inspiratory muscle strength and vital capacity , and feasibility outcome variables were adverse effects and patient satisfaction with inspiratory muscle training . Results : Despite r and omization , patients in the intervention group were significantly older than the patients in the control group ( 70 ± 6 years versus 59 ± 6 years , respectively ; P = 0.001 ) . Eight patients in the control group and three in the intervention group developed atelectasis ( P = 0.07 ) . The median duration of atelectasis was 0 days in the intervention group and 1.5 days in the control group ( P = 0.07 ) . No adverse effects of preoperative inspiratory muscle training were observed and patients considered that inspiratory muscle training was a good preparation for surgery . Mean postoperative inspiratory pressure was 10 % higher in the intervention group . Conclusion : Preoperative inspiratory muscle training is well tolerated and appreciated and seems to reduce the incidence of atelectasis in patients scheduled for elective abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery
Overall , there is little direct evidence for components of ERAS , with much derived from nonesophageal thoracoabdominal surgery .
ERAS in principle seems logical and safe for esophagectomy .
OBJECTIVE This article aims to provide the first systematic review of enhanced recovery after surgery ( ERAS ) programs for  esophagectomy  and generate guidelines .
BACKGROUND ERAS programs use multimodal approaches to reduce complications and accelerate recovery .
Although ERAS is well established in colorectal surgery , experience after esophagectomy has been minimal .
However , esophagectomy remains an extremely high-risk operation , commonly performed in patients with significant comorbidities .
Consequently , ERAS may have a significant role to play in improving outcomes .
No guidelines or review s have been published in esophagectomy .