The majority of adverse events associated with CNTKA were minor and comparable with those seen with conventional TKA .
Clinical outcomes were comparable between the two techniques , with longer-term follow-up suggesting that CNTKA provided no benefit over conventional TKA in terms of sustained functional improvements .
At present , it is unclear whether the significant improvements shown in radiological outcomes after CNTKA translate to measurable clinical benefits .
BACKGROUND Conventional total knee arthroplasty ( TKA ) and the more recently available computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty ( CNTKA ) use alternative methods to achieve correct limb alignment .
This systematic review was undertaken to assess the safety and effectiveness of CNTKA compared with conventional TKA .
Comparison of radiographic alignment of imageless computer-assisted surgery vs conventional instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty.
A total of 208 patients were enrolled in a multicenter , prospect i ve r and omized , institutional review board-approved study that compared preoperative surgical plan to postoperative 2-dimensional radiographic alignment measured by a blinded review er for  primary total knee arthroplasty ( TKA ) implanted using computer-assisted surgery ( CAS ) compared with conventional TKA instrumentation . The results demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in the coronal tibial component alignment ( P < .03 ) and failed to demonstrate a statistically significant improvement in the mechanical axis , femoral coronal/sagittal , and tibial sagittal alignment . Knee Society Score knee and function scores and 6-minute walk test were equivalent between the 2 treatment groups at all postoperative intervals . There was a statistically significant increase in the skin-skin time ( P < .0001 ) and the time until first bone cut ( P < .0001 ) for the CAS knees compared with those implanted with conventional instrumentation . The use of CAS in this r and omized clinical trial conducted at high-volume centers did not offer a clinical ly meaningful improvement in postoperative alignment , clinical , functional , or safety outcomes compared with conventional TKA
The majority of adverse events associated with CNTKA were minor and comparable with those seen with conventional TKA .
Clinical outcomes were comparable between the two techniques , with longer-term follow-up suggesting that CNTKA provided no benefit over conventional TKA in terms of sustained functional improvements .
At present , it is unclear whether the significant improvements shown in radiological outcomes after CNTKA translate to measurable clinical benefits .
BACKGROUND Conventional total knee arthroplasty ( TKA ) and the more recently available computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty ( CNTKA ) use alternative methods to achieve correct limb alignment .
This systematic review was undertaken to assess the safety and effectiveness of CNTKA compared with conventional TKA .