AND PRACTICAL IMPLICATION S Because new caries lesions in the margins of restorations are the main reason for failure and replacement of restorations in primary teeth , it is important to know whether there is a benefit in using GICs in both occlusal and occlusoproximal cavities
BACKGROUND Fluoride released from glass ionomer cements ( GICs ) is capable of preventing caries lesions .
However , the preventive effect in margins of occlusal and occlusoproximal restorations have not been proved .
Eroded dentin does not jeopardize the bond strength of adhesive restorative materials.
This in vitro study evaluated the bond strength of adhesive restorative material s to sound and eroded dentin . Thirty-six bovine incisors were embedded in acrylic resin and ground to obtain flat buccal dentin surfaces . Specimens were r and omly allocated in 2 groups : sound dentin ( immersion in artificial saliva ) and eroded dentin ( pH cycling model - 3 × / cola drink for 7 days ) . Specimens were then reassigned according to restorative material : glass ionomer cement ( KetacTM Molar Easy Mix ) , resin-modified glass ionomer cement ( VitremerTM ) or adhesive system with resin composite ( Adper Single Bond 2 + Filtek Z250 ) . Polyethylene tubes with an internal diameter of 0.76 mm were placed over the dentin and filled with the material . The microshear bond test was performed after 24 h of water storage at 37ºC. The failure mode was evaluated using a stereomicroscope ( 400 × ) . Bond strength data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA and Tukey 's post hoc tests ( α = 0.05 ) . Eroded dentin showed bond strength values similar to those for sound dentin for all material s. The adhesive system showed the highest bond strength values , regardless of the substrate ( p < 0.0001 ) . For all groups , the adhesive/mixed failure prevailed . In conclusion , adhesive material s may be used in eroded dentin without jeopardizing the bonding quality . It is preferable to use an etch- and -rinse adhesive system because it shows the highest bond strength values compared with the glass ionomer cements tested
AND PRACTICAL IMPLICATION S Because new caries lesions in the margins of restorations are the main reason for failure and replacement of restorations in primary teeth , it is important to know whether there is a benefit in using GICs in both occlusal and occlusoproximal cavities
BACKGROUND Fluoride released from glass ionomer cements ( GICs ) is capable of preventing caries lesions .
However , the preventive effect in margins of occlusal and occlusoproximal restorations have not been proved .