A pattern of consistent evolution in fast-track protocol s was clearly demonstrated and these have shown variations in the core-identified components across the studies .
In the future incremental gains through focused improvements in key components will lend itself to even better postoperative outcomes and patient experience during oesophageal cancer treatment
Fast track is a st and ardised goal directed patient 's care pathway that aims to facilitate recovery following surgery .
Currently , there are large variations in the fast track protocol s used in oesophagectomy due to the complexity of the procedure .
The objective of this systematic review is to assess the evolution of fast track protocol s  following oesophagectomy  since its implementation and the result ing effect on postoperative outcomes .
Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND Surgical resection is regarded as the only curative option for resectable oesophageal cancer , but pulmonary complications occurring in more than half of patients after open oesophagectomy are a great concern . We assessed whether minimally invasive oesophagectomy reduces morbidity compared with open oesophagectomy . METHODS We did a multicentre , open-label , r and omised controlled trial at five study centres in three countries between June 1 , 2009 , and March 31 , 2011 . Patients aged 18 - 75 years with resectable cancer of the oesophagus or gastro-oesophageal junction were r and omly assigned via a computer-generated r and omisation sequence to receive either open transthoracic or minimally invasive transthoracic oesophagectomy . R and omisation was stratified by centre . Patients , and investigators undertaking interventions , assessing outcomes , and analysing data , were not masked to group assignment . The primary outcome was pulmonary infection within the first 2 weeks after surgery and during the whole stay in hospital . Analysis was by intention to treat . This trial is registered with the Netherl and s Trial Register , NTR TC 2452 . FINDINGS We r and omly assigned 56 patients to the open oesophagectomy group and 59 to the minimally invasive oesophagectomy group . 16 ( 29 % ) patients in the open oesophagectomy group had pulmonary infection in the first 2 weeks compared with five ( 9 % ) in the minimally invasive group ( relative risk [ RR ] 0·30 , 95 % CI 0·12 - 0·76 ; p=0·005 ) . 19 ( 34 % ) patients in the open oesophagectomy group had pulmonary infection in-hospital compared with seven ( 12 % ) in the minimally invasive group ( 0·35 , 0·16 - 0·78 ; p=0·005 ) . For in-hospital mortality , one patient in the open oesophagectomy group died from anastomotic leakage and two in the minimally invasive group from aspiration and mediastinitis after anastomotic leakage . INTERPRETATION These findings provide evidence for the short-term benefits of minimally invasive oesophagectomy for patients with resectable oesophageal cancer . FUNDING Digestive Surgery Foundation of the Unit of Digestive Surgery of the VU University Medical Centre
A pattern of consistent evolution in fast-track protocol s was clearly demonstrated and these have shown variations in the core-identified components across the studies .
In the future incremental gains through focused improvements in key components will lend itself to even better postoperative outcomes and patient experience during oesophageal cancer treatment
Fast track is a st and ardised goal directed patient 's care pathway that aims to facilitate recovery following surgery .
Currently , there are large variations in the fast track protocol s used in oesophagectomy due to the complexity of the procedure .
The objective of this systematic review is to assess the evolution of fast track protocol s  following oesophagectomy  since its implementation and the result ing effect on postoperative outcomes .