Compared with an energy-restricted SP diet , an isocalorically prescribed HP diet provides modest benefits for reductions in body weight , FM , and triglycerides and for mitigating reductions in FFM and REE
BACKGROUND It is currently unclear whether altering the carbohydrate-to-protein ratio of low-fat , energy-restricted diets augments weight loss and cardiometabolic risk markers .
OBJECTIVE The objective was to conduct a systematic review and meta- analysis of studies that compared energy-restricted , isocaloric , high-protein , low-fat ( HP ) diets with st and ard-protein , low-fat ( SP ) diets on weight loss , body composition , resting energy expenditure ( REE ) , satiety and appetite , and cardiometabolic risk factors .
Short-term effects of substituting protein for carbohydrate in the diets of moderately hypercholesterolemic human subjects.
The short-term effects on plasma lipoprotein lipids of substituting meat and dairy protein for carbohydrate in the diets of 10 free-living moderately hypercholesterolemic human subjects ( four men , six women ) were studied under closely supervised dietary control during the consumption of constant , low intakes of fat and cholesterol and the maintenance of stable body weight as well as constant fiber consumption . Subjects were r and omly allocated to either the high or low protein diets ( mean , 23 % v 11 % of energy as protein , 24 % as fat , and 53 % v 65 % as carbohydrate ) and then switched to the other diet for another 4 to 5 weeks . Mean fasting plasma high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ( HDL-C ) was significantly higher by 12 % + /- 4 % ( 0.97 + /- 0.08 v 0.89 + /- 0.08 mmol/L , P less than .01 ) , whereas mean total cholesterol ( TC ) was lower by 6.5 % + /- 1.3 % ( 5.7 + /- 0.3 v 6.1 + /- 0.3 mmol/L , P less than .001 ) , mean low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol ( LDL-C ) lower by 6.4 % + /- 2.0 % ( 4.5 + /- 0.2 v 4.8 + /- 0.2 mmol/L , P less than .02 ) , mean total triglycerides ( TG ) lower by 23 % + /- 5 % ( 1.7 + /- 0.1 v 2.4 + /- 0.3 mmol/L , P less than .02 ) , and mean high versus low protein diet . Mean values for LDL-C were significantly lower during weeks 3 to 5 of the high protein diet than during either weeks 1 to 5 or weeks 1 to 2 of the high protein diet ( 4.3 + /- 0.3 , 4.5 + /- 0.2 , and 4.7 + /- 0.3 mmol/L , respectively , P less than .05 ) and 11 % + /- 3 % lower than on low protein diet , P less than .005 . The ratio of plasma LDL-C to HDL-C was consistently lower by 17 % + /- 3 % during the high versus low protein diet ( 4.9 + /- 0.5 v 5.8 + /- 0.5 , P less than .001 ) . Lowering plasma TC and LDL-C and total TG and VLDL-TG and increasing HDL-C by chronic isocaloric substitution of dietary for carbohydrate may enhance the cardiovascular risk reduction obtained by restriction of dietary fat and cholesterol
Compared with an energy-restricted SP diet , an isocalorically prescribed HP diet provides modest benefits for reductions in body weight , FM , and triglycerides and for mitigating reductions in FFM and REE
BACKGROUND It is currently unclear whether altering the carbohydrate-to-protein ratio of low-fat , energy-restricted diets augments weight loss and cardiometabolic risk markers .
OBJECTIVE The objective was to conduct a systematic review and meta- analysis of studies that compared energy-restricted , isocaloric , high-protein , low-fat ( HP ) diets with st and ard-protein , low-fat ( SP ) diets on weight loss , body composition , resting energy expenditure ( REE ) , satiety and appetite , and cardiometabolic risk factors .