Data showed improvements secondary to exercise in ' physical function ' and ' general health ' .
The other domains - ' role physical ' , ' bodily pain ' , ' vitality ' , ' social ' , ' role emotional ' , and ' mental health ' - did not show improvement at six months .
Although results showed significant heterogeneity between trials , population s and outcomes were comparable overall , with findings relevant to the claudicant population .
High- quality evidence shows that exercise programmes provided important benefit compared with placebo or usual care in improving both pain-free and maximum walking distance in people with leg pain from IC who were considered to be fit for exercise intervention .
Exercise did not improve ABI , and we found no evidence of an effect of exercise on amputation or mortality .
Exercise may improve quality of life when compared with placebo or usual care .
BACKGROUND Exercise programmes are a relatively inexpensive , low-risk option compared with other , more invasive therapies for treatment of leg pain on walking ( intermittent claudication ( IC ) ) .
This is the fourth up date of a review first published in 1998 .
OBJECTIVES Our goal was to determine whether an exercise programme was effective in alleviating symptoms and increasing walking treadmill distances and walking times in people with intermittent claudication .
Secondary objectives were to determine whether exercise was effective in preventing deterioration of underlying disease , reducing cardiovascular events , and improving quality of life .
The Claudication: Exercise Vs. Endoluminal Revascularization (CLEVER) study: rationale and methods.
Intermittent claudication is the primary symptom of peripheral arterial disease , affecting between 1 and 3 million Americans . Symptomatic improvement can be achieved by endovascular revascularization , but such procedures are invasive , expensive , and may be associated with procedural adverse events . Medical treatment options , including claudication medications and supervised exercise training , are also known to be effective , albeit also with associated limitations . The CLEVER ( Claudication : Exercise Vs . Endoluminal Revascularization ) study , funded by the Heart , Lung , and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health , is a prospect i ve , multicenter , r and omized , controlled clinical trial evaluating the relative efficacy , safety , and health economic impact of four treatment strategies for people with aortoiliac peripheral arterial disease and claudication . The treatment arms are : ( 1 ) optimal medical care ( claudication pharmacotherapy ) ; ( 2 ) primary stent placement ; ( 3 ) supervised exercise rehabilitation ; and ( 4 ) combined stenting with supervised exercise rehabilitation . The CLEVER study is a 5-year r and omized , controlled clinical trial to be conducted at approximately 25 centers in the United States that will monitor 252 patients and their responses to treatment during an 18-month follow-up period . The primary end point is change in maximum walking duration on a grade d treadmill test . Secondary end points include the change at 18 months in maximum walking duration from baseline , comparisons of free-living daily activity levels assessed by pedometer , health-related quality of life , and cost-effectiveness . Other analyses include the effect of these treatment strategies on anthropomorphic and physiologic variables , including body mass index , waist circumference , blood pressure , pulse pressure , and resting pulse as well as biochemical markers of cardiovascular health , including fasting lipids , fibrinogen , C-reactive protein , and hemoglobin A 1c values
Data showed improvements secondary to exercise in ' physical function ' and ' general health ' .
The other domains - ' role physical ' , ' bodily pain ' , ' vitality ' , ' social ' , ' role emotional ' , and ' mental health ' - did not show improvement at six months .
Although results showed significant heterogeneity between trials , population s and outcomes were comparable overall , with findings relevant to the claudicant population .
High- quality evidence shows that exercise programmes provided important benefit compared with placebo or usual care in improving both pain-free and maximum walking distance in people with leg pain from IC who were considered to be fit for exercise intervention .
Exercise did not improve ABI , and we found no evidence of an effect of exercise on amputation or mortality .
Exercise may improve quality of life when compared with placebo or usual care .
BACKGROUND Exercise programmes are a relatively inexpensive , low-risk option compared with other , more invasive therapies for treatment of leg pain on walking ( intermittent claudication ( IC ) ) .
This is the fourth up date of a review first published in 1998 .
OBJECTIVES Our goal was to determine whether an exercise programme was effective in alleviating symptoms and increasing walking treadmill distances and walking times in people with intermittent claudication .
Secondary objectives were to determine whether exercise was effective in preventing deterioration of underlying disease , reducing cardiovascular events , and improving quality of life .