The cost of intervention per participant delivered by dietitians was lower than interventions delivered by non-dietitians , although few studies reported costs .
Lifestyle interventions are effective in reducing body weight and glucose-related outcomes .
Dietitian-delivered interventions , compared with those delivered by other personnel , achieved greater weight reduction .
No consistent trend was identified across different delivery channels
BACKGROUND Type 2 diabetes is a significant public health concern .
With the completion of the Diabetes Prevention Program , there has been a proliferation of studies attempting to translate this evidence base into practice .
However , the cost , effectiveness , and cost-effectiveness of these adapted interventions is unknown .
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this systematic review was to conduct a comprehensive meta- analysis to synthesize the effectiveness , cost , and cost-effectiveness of lifestyle diabetes prevention interventions and compare effects by intervention delivery agent ( dietitian vs non-dietitian ) and channel ( in-person vs technology-delivered ) .
Randomised controlled trial evaluating lifestyle interventions in people with impaired glucose tolerance.
AIM To evaluate the effectiveness of lifestyle interventions in people with impaired glucose tolerance ( IGT ) . METHODS Participants with IGT ( n=78 ) , diagnosed on two consecutive oral glucose tolerance tests ( OGTTs ) , were r and omly assigned to a 2-year lifestyle intervention or to a control group . Main outcome measures were changes from baseline in : nutrient intake ; physical activity ; anthropometry , glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity . Measurements were repeated at 6 , 12 and 24 months follow-up . RESULTS After 24 months follow-up , there was a significant fall in total fat consumption ( difference in change between groups ( Delta intervention-Delta control)= -17.9 , 95 % confidence interval ( CI ) -33.6 to -2.1g/day ) as a result of the intervention . Body mass was significantly lower in the intervention group compared with controls after 6 months ( -1.6 , 95 % CI -2.9 to -0.4 kg ) and 24 months ( -3.3 , 95 % CI -5.7 to -0.89 kg ) . Whole body insulin sensitivity , assessed by the short insulin tolerance test ( ITT ) , improved after 12 months in the intervention group ( 0.52 , 95 % CI 0.15 - 0.89%/min ) . CONCLUSIONS These findings complement the findings of the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study and the American Diabetes Prevention Study , both of which tested intensive interventions , by showing that pragmatic lifestyle interventions result in improvements in obesity and whole body insulin sensitivity in individuals with IGT , without change in other cardiovascular risk factors
The cost of intervention per participant delivered by dietitians was lower than interventions delivered by non-dietitians , although few studies reported costs .
Lifestyle interventions are effective in reducing body weight and glucose-related outcomes .
Dietitian-delivered interventions , compared with those delivered by other personnel , achieved greater weight reduction .
No consistent trend was identified across different delivery channels
BACKGROUND Type 2 diabetes is a significant public health concern .
With the completion of the Diabetes Prevention Program , there has been a proliferation of studies attempting to translate this evidence base into practice .
However , the cost , effectiveness , and cost-effectiveness of these adapted interventions is unknown .
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this systematic review was to conduct a comprehensive meta- analysis to synthesize the effectiveness , cost , and cost-effectiveness of lifestyle diabetes prevention interventions and compare effects by intervention delivery agent ( dietitian vs non-dietitian ) and channel ( in-person vs technology-delivered ) .