There was also some weak evidence to suggest that patients taking milnacipran experienced fewer adverse events of sleepiness/ drowsiness , dry mouth or constipation compared with TCAs .
AUTHORS ' CONCLUSIONS Currently , there is inadequate evidence to conclude whether milnacipran is superior , inferior or the same as other antidepressive agents in terms of efficacy , acceptability and tolerability in the acute phase treatment of major depression .
However , there is some evidence in favour of milnacipran over TCAs in terms of dropouts due to adverse events ( acceptability ) and the rates of experiencing adverse events ( tolerability ) .
Further study is needed to answer whether milnacipran would be the better choice of antidepressant for acute major depression
BACKGROUND Although pharmacological and psychological interventions are both effective for major depression , antidepressant drugs are frequently used as first-line treatment in primary and secondary care setting s. Milnacipran , a dual serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor ( SNRI ) , is one of the antidepressant drugs that clinicians use for routine depression care .
OBJECTIVES To assess the evidence for the efficacy , acceptability and tolerability of milnacipran in comparison with tricyclic antidepressants ( TCAs ) , heterocyclics , SSRIs and other newer antidepressive agents in the acute-phase treatment of major depression .
Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors
Abstract Objective To examine the extent and nature of outcome reporting bias in a broad cohort of published r and omised trials . Design Retrospective review of publications and follow up survey of authors . Cohort All journal articles of r and omised trials indexed in PubMed whose primary publication appeared in December 2000 . Main outcome measures Prevalence of incompletely reported outcomes per trial ; reasons for not reporting outcomes ; association between completeness of reporting and statistical significance . Results 519 trials with 553 publications and 10 557 outcomes were identified . Survey responders ( response rate 69 % ) provided information on unreported outcomes but were often unreliable — for 32 % of those who denied the existence of such outcomes there was evidence to the contrary in their publications . On average , over 20 % of the outcomes measured in a parallel group trial were incompletely reported . Within a trial , such outcomes had a higher odds of being statistically non-significant compared with fully reported outcomes ( odds ratio 2.0 ( 95 % confidence interval 1.6 to 2.7 ) for efficacy outcomes ; 1.9 ( 1.1 to 3.5 ) for harm outcomes ) . The most commonly reported reasons for omitting efficacy outcomes included space constraints , lack of clinical importance , and lack of statistical significance . Conclusions Incomplete reporting of outcomes within published articles of r and omised trials is common and is associated with statistical non- significance . The medical literature therefore represents a selective and biased subset of study outcomes , and trial protocol s should be made publicly available
There was also some weak evidence to suggest that patients taking milnacipran experienced fewer adverse events of sleepiness/ drowsiness , dry mouth or constipation compared with TCAs .
AUTHORS ' CONCLUSIONS Currently , there is inadequate evidence to conclude whether milnacipran is superior , inferior or the same as other antidepressive agents in terms of efficacy , acceptability and tolerability in the acute phase treatment of major depression .
However , there is some evidence in favour of milnacipran over TCAs in terms of dropouts due to adverse events ( acceptability ) and the rates of experiencing adverse events ( tolerability ) .
Further study is needed to answer whether milnacipran would be the better choice of antidepressant for acute major depression
BACKGROUND Although pharmacological and psychological interventions are both effective for major depression , antidepressant drugs are frequently used as first-line treatment in primary and secondary care setting s. Milnacipran , a dual serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor ( SNRI ) , is one of the antidepressant drugs that clinicians use for routine depression care .
OBJECTIVES To assess the evidence for the efficacy , acceptability and tolerability of milnacipran in comparison with tricyclic antidepressants ( TCAs ) , heterocyclics , SSRIs and other newer antidepressive agents in the acute-phase treatment of major depression .