There is limited evidence to suggest which ablation method was the best .
There is limited evidence to suggest that CA may be a better treatment option compared to medical therapies in the management of persistent AF .
This review was also unable to recommend the best CA method
BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia seen in cardiovascular departments .
Treatments include medical interventions and catheter ablation .
Due to uncertainties in medical therapies for AF , and the need to continue sinus rhythm , ablation has been recently considered as a viable alternative .
Many new ablation methods based on pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) have been developed .
OBJECTIVES The primary objective of this review was to assess the beneficial and harmful effects of  catheter ablation ( CA ) in comparison with medical treatment in patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF .
The secondary objective was to determine the best regimen of CA .
Morbidity and mortality in 229 elderly patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation. A five-year follow-up.
BACKGROUND In the elderly the impact of atrial fibrillation on mortality and morbidity is substantial . Oral anticoagulant therapy reduces the risk of stroke by 70 % ; nevertheless , it remains largely underused . We evaluated , in a community prospect i ve study , the factors associated with embolic events and death and the feasibility of oral anticoagulant therapy managed by general practitioners . METHODS We enrolled at the Trieste Cardiovascular Center 229 patients aged > or = 65 years with non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation . At baseline , each patient underwent a transesophageal echocardiography and received instructions about oral anticoagulation . Patients were regularly followed by their general practitioner and finally evaluated at the Center . RESULTS At baseline , the mean age was 73 years , 14 % of patients were free of heart disease , 27 % had had a previous embolic event , and 33 % had an atrial thrombus . After a 5-year follow-up , 85 % of the patients had been admitted to hospital , 17 % had suffered an embolic event , and 35 % were dead . Diabetes and the presence of a low flow in the left atrial appendage were predictive of embolic events . Heart failure , spontaneous echocontrast and aortic plaques were predictive of death . Anticoagulant therapy increased from 14 to 34 % but the incidence of major bleeding did not change . The patients on anticoagulant therapy at follow-up constituted the group with the worst cardiovascular profile and embolic rate , but had a lower death rate ( 19 % ) compared with those on antiplatelet therapy ( 32 % ) and with those without antithrombotic therapy ( 67 % ) . The hospitalization rates were respectively 78 , 83 and 100 % . CONCLUSIONS In a group of elderly patients followed by their general practitioner with the support of a specialized cardiologic unit , oral anticoagulant therapy was well tolerated and associated with a significant decrease in mortality and hospitalization
There is limited evidence to suggest which ablation method was the best .
There is limited evidence to suggest that CA may be a better treatment option compared to medical therapies in the management of persistent AF .
This review was also unable to recommend the best CA method
BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia seen in cardiovascular departments .
Treatments include medical interventions and catheter ablation .
Due to uncertainties in medical therapies for AF , and the need to continue sinus rhythm , ablation has been recently considered as a viable alternative .
Many new ablation methods based on pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) have been developed .
OBJECTIVES The primary objective of this review was to assess the beneficial and harmful effects of  catheter ablation ( CA ) in comparison with medical treatment in patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF .
The secondary objective was to determine the best regimen of CA .