Total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol were reduced in all trials but there was evidence of heterogeneity of effects .
There was no evidence of any serious harm caused by statin prescription .
Evidence available to date showed that primary prevention with statins is likely to be cost-effective and may improve patient quality of life .
Recent findings from the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists study using individual patient data meta- analysis indicate that these benefits are similar in people at lower ( < 1 % per year ) risk of a major cardiovascular event .
AUTHORS ' CONCLUSIONS Reductions in all-cause mortality , major vascular events and revascularisations were found with no excess of adverse events among people without evidence of CVD treated with statins
BACKGROUND Reducing high blood cholesterol , a risk factor for cardiovascular disease ( CVD ) events in people with and without a past history of CVD is an important goal of pharmacotherapy .
Statins are the first-choice agents .
Previous review s of the effects of statins have highlighted their benefits in people with CVD .
The case for primary prevention was uncertain when the last version of this review was published ( 2011 ) and in light of new data an up date of this review is required .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects , both harms and benefits , of statins in people with no history of CVD .
Effect of Intensive Versus Standard Lipid-Lowering Treatment With Atorvastatin on the Progression of Calcified Coronary Atherosclerosis Over 12 Months: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial
Background — Recent clinical trials have suggested that intensive versus st and ard lipid-lowering therapy provides for additional benefit . Electron-beam computed tomography provides the opportunity to quantify the progression of coronary artery calcification ( CAC ) in serial measurements . Methods and Results — In a multicenter , r and omized , double-blind trial , 471 patients ( age 61±8 years ) who had no history of coronary artery disease and no evidence of high- grade coronary stenoses ( > 50 % diameter reduction ) were r and omized if they had ≥2 cardiovascular risk factors and moderate calcified coronary atherosclerosis as evidence d by a CAC score ≥30 . Patients were assigned to receive 80 mg or 10 mg of atorvastatin per day over 12 months . Progression of CAC volume scores could be analyzed in 366 patients . After pretreatment with 10 mg of atorvastatin for 4 weeks , 12 months of study medication reduced LDL cholesterol from 106±22 to 87±33 mg/dL in the group r and omized to receive 80 mg of atorvastatin ( P<0.001 ) , whereas levels remained stable in the group r and omized to receive 10 mg ( 108±23 at baseline , 109±28 mg/dL at the end of the study , P = NS ) . The mean progression of CAC volume scores , corrected for the baseline CAC volume score , was 27 % ( 95 % CI 20.8 % to 33.1 % ) in the 80-mg atorvastatin group and 25 % ( 95 % CI 19.1 % to 30.8 % ) in the 10-mg atorvastatin group ( P=0.65 ) . CAC progression showed no relationship with on-treatment LDL cholesterol levels . Conclusions — We did not observe a relationship between on-treatment LDL cholesterol levels and the progression of calcified coronary atherosclerosis . Over a period of 12 months , intensive atorvastatin therapy was unable to attenuate CAC progression  compared with st and ard atorvastatin therapy . The possibility remains that the time window was too short to demonstrate an effect
Total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol were reduced in all trials but there was evidence of heterogeneity of effects .
There was no evidence of any serious harm caused by statin prescription .
Evidence available to date showed that primary prevention with statins is likely to be cost-effective and may improve patient quality of life .
Recent findings from the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists study using individual patient data meta- analysis indicate that these benefits are similar in people at lower ( < 1 % per year ) risk of a major cardiovascular event .
AUTHORS ' CONCLUSIONS Reductions in all-cause mortality , major vascular events and revascularisations were found with no excess of adverse events among people without evidence of CVD treated with statins
BACKGROUND Reducing high blood cholesterol , a risk factor for cardiovascular disease ( CVD ) events in people with and without a past history of CVD is an important goal of pharmacotherapy .
Statins are the first-choice agents .
Previous review s of the effects of statins have highlighted their benefits in people with CVD .
The case for primary prevention was uncertain when the last version of this review was published ( 2011 ) and in light of new data an up date of this review is required .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects , both harms and benefits , of statins in people with no history of CVD .