There is limited evidence to suggest which ablation method was the best .
There is limited evidence to suggest that CA may be a better treatment option compared to medical therapies in the management of persistent AF .
This review was also unable to recommend the best CA method
BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia seen in cardiovascular departments .
Treatments include medical interventions and catheter ablation .
Due to uncertainties in medical therapies for AF , and the need to continue sinus rhythm , ablation has been recently considered as a viable alternative .
Many new ablation methods based on pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) have been developed .
OBJECTIVES The primary objective of this review was to assess the beneficial and harmful effects of  catheter ablation ( CA ) in comparison with medical treatment in patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF .
The secondary objective was to determine the best regimen of CA .
Pulmonary vein isolation and linear lesions in atrial fibrillation ablation
Background Various strategies have been used for atrial fibrillation ( AF ) ablation . It is unclear whether adding linear lesions to pulmonary vein ( PV ) isolation has significant advantages . Objectives We assessed the clinical benefit of adding linear lesions in patients undergoing PV isolation for AF . Methods One hundred patients ( 63 male and 37 female ; mean age of 59 ± 11 years ) with documented paroxysmal AF were included in the study . Patients were r and omized into two groups . The first group underwent PV isolation alone . The second group underwent PV isolation and had two linear lesions created ; one line between the superior PVs , and a second line from the left inferior PV to the mitral valve annulus . Patients ’ clinical progress after the ablation was evaluated and compared at 1 , 3 , and 9 months after their respective ablation procedures . Results The linear lesions group maintained sinus rhythm and had fewer symptoms than the lone PV isolation group ( 86 vs. 58 % , respectively ) ( p < 0.05 ) at 1 month . At 9 months , when patients who reverted to AF underwent additional management to regain sinus rhythm ( 90 vs. 82 % , respectively ) ( p = NS ) , there was no statistical difference between the groups regarding the use of antiarrhythmics , the need for electrical cardioversion , and subjective improvement . Conclusion The addition of linear lesions to PV isolation more effectively achieved sinus rhythm initially and fewer patients required additional management to maintain their rhythm when compared to patients who underwent lone PV isolation . However , at 9 months , the overall results were similar in both groups
There is limited evidence to suggest which ablation method was the best .
There is limited evidence to suggest that CA may be a better treatment option compared to medical therapies in the management of persistent AF .
This review was also unable to recommend the best CA method
BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia seen in cardiovascular departments .
Treatments include medical interventions and catheter ablation .
Due to uncertainties in medical therapies for AF , and the need to continue sinus rhythm , ablation has been recently considered as a viable alternative .
Many new ablation methods based on pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) have been developed .
OBJECTIVES The primary objective of this review was to assess the beneficial and harmful effects of  catheter ablation ( CA ) in comparison with medical treatment in patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF .
The secondary objective was to determine the best regimen of CA .