INTERPRETATION The guidelines have improved method ological reporting in RSA studies , but adherence to these guidelines is still relatively low .
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Guidelines for st and ardization of  radiostereometry ( RSA )  of implants were published in 2005 to facilitate comparison of outcomes between various research groups .
In this systematic review , we determined how well studies have adhered to these guidelines .
Effect of augmented cup fixation on stability, wear, and osteolysis: a 5-year follow-up of total hip arthroplasty with RSA.
To evaluate different modes of cementless fixation of hemispherical cups , we operated on 87 hips in 81 patients using 4 different means of cup fixation . The hips were r and omly assigned to fixation with press-fit technique only ( PF ) , or with augmentation with screws ( S ) , pegs ( P ) , or hydroxyapatite ( HA ) coating . The patients were evaluated with radiostereometric analysis ( RSA ) for cup migration and wear , conventional radiography for osteolysis , and Harris Hip Score for clinical outcome over 5 years . The fixation of the cups did not differ between the groups , but HA showed a tendency to decrease proximal migration . HA-coated cups displayed the best interface with hardly any signs of radiolucent lines , indicating a superior sealing effect of the HA coating . Cups with screws or pegs had more radiolucent lines and osteolytic lesions than the other groups . Radiolucent lines were correlated to higher proximal migration , young age , and female gender ( r2=.2 ) . The wear rate of the ethylene oxide-sterilized polyethylene liner was high ( 0.2 mm/y ) but did not differ between the groups . Two cups with a perioperative fracture of the acetabular rim showed large initial migration but stabilized thereafter
INTERPRETATION The guidelines have improved method ological reporting in RSA studies , but adherence to these guidelines is still relatively low .
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Guidelines for st and ardization of  radiostereometry ( RSA )  of implants were published in 2005 to facilitate comparison of outcomes between various research groups .
In this systematic review , we determined how well studies have adhered to these guidelines .