Where data were available , the relative benefits seen held true both after a single or multiple procedure(s ) .
For patients with persistent atrial fibrillation , CA achieves significantly greater freedom from recurrent atrial fibrillation compared with medical therapy .
BACKGROUND Catheter ablation ( CA ) is commonly performed for persistent atrial fibrillation , but few high- quality r and omized controlled trials ( RCTs ) exist , leading to funding restrictions being proposed in several countries .
We performed a r and om-effects meta- analysis of RCTs and non- RCTs to assess the efficacy of CA for persistent atrial fibrillation .
Randomized Evaluation of Right Atrial Ablation After Left Atrial Ablation of Complex Fractionated Atrial Electrograms for Long-Lasting Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
Background —With electrogram-guided radiofrequency ablation ( RFA ) of long-lasting persistent atrial fibrillation ( AF ) , the best results have been reported when complex fractionated electrograms ( CFAEs ) in both the left ( LA ) and right ( RA ) atria were targeted . However , many studies have reported excellent outcomes from RFA of long-lasting persistent AF with the use of other ablation strategies that were limited to the LA . The incremental value of RFA of RA CFAEs is yet to be defined . Methods and Results —In 85 patients with long-lasting persistent AF ( age=59±10 years ) , RFA was directed at CFAEs in the LA and coronary sinus until AF terminated ( 19 ) or all identified LA CFAEs were eliminated . Sixty-six patients who remained in AF were r and omly assigned to cardioversion and no further RFA ( n=33 ) or to RFA of RA CFAEs ( n=33 ) . RA sites consisted of the crista terminalis ( 69 % ) , septum ( 38 % ) , superior vena cava ( 28 % ) , coronary sinus ostium ( 22 % ) , and the base of the appendage ( 31 % ) . AF terminated in 1 ( 3 % ) of 33 patients during RA RFA . At 17±6 months after a single ablation procedure , 74 % of the patients in whom AF terminated during LA RFA were in sinus rhythm . Rates of freedom from AF were similar in the patients r and omized to no RFA in the RA ( 24 % ) and those r and omized to RFA of RA CFAEs ( 30 % , P=0.8 ) . The ablation procedure was repeated in 26 patients ( 31 % ) for AF ( n=22 ) or atrial flutter ( n=4 ) . At 16±7 months after the final procedure , 89 % of the patients in whom AF terminated during LA RFA were in sinus rhythm . Among the r and omized patients , the proportion of patients who remained in sinus rhythm was similar in patients who did not undergo RFA of RA CFAEs ( 52 % ) and those who did ( 58 % , P=0.6 ) . Conclusion —After RFA of CFAEs in the LA and coronary sinus , ablation of CFAEs in the RA provides little or no increment in efficacy among patients with long-lasting persistent AF
Where data were available , the relative benefits seen held true both after a single or multiple procedure(s ) .
For patients with persistent atrial fibrillation , CA achieves significantly greater freedom from recurrent atrial fibrillation compared with medical therapy .
BACKGROUND Catheter ablation ( CA ) is commonly performed for persistent atrial fibrillation , but few high- quality r and omized controlled trials ( RCTs ) exist , leading to funding restrictions being proposed in several countries .
We performed a r and om-effects meta- analysis of RCTs and non- RCTs to assess the efficacy of CA for persistent atrial fibrillation .