High-intensity interval training ( HIT ) with duration of 2 to 6 weeks seems to be the best exercise programme in a prehabilitation intervention but it exists heterogeneity in terms of intensity and duration .
Prehabilitation increase exercise capacity and significantly enhances pulmonary function .
But the reduction of postoperative complication and mortality has not been clearly demonstrated .
It seems that not all patients can benefit from prehabilitation and it could be indicated only in patients with impaired lung function .
Meanwhile , safety of prehabilitation and good results of some studies support this intervention in high-risk patients
Surgical resection remains the best treatment option for patients with early stage of non-small cell lung cancer ( NSCLC ) .
However , it may be responsible of postoperative complication and mortality , especially in patients with impaired pulmonary function .
Enhanced recovery after surgery ( ERAS ) programs have been focused mainly in minimal invasive surgery approach during lung resection and respiratory rehabilitation after surgery .
Preoperative exercise-based intervention ( prehabilitation ) has demonstrated reduction of morbi-mortality in other surgeries but in thoracic surgery continues to be under discussion .
Cardio-pulmonary exercise test ( CPET ) is the gold st and ard technique to predict postoperative morbi-mortality .
The implementation of a preoperative respiratory rehabilitation could optimize patient 's physical capacity before surgery and improve outcomes and enhance recovery .
The aim of this systematic review of the literature is to identify the effectiveness and safety of prehabilitation programs in thoracic surgery , the type of exercise and its duration , and the group of patients with best benefit .
Prehabilitation is a safe intervention without side effects in patients .
Perioperative rehabilitation and physiotherapy for lung cancer patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of pulmonary rehabilitation on surgical morbidity and lung function in lung cancer patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ( COPD ) . METHODS Prospect ively , 22 lung cancer patients with COPD who underwent lobectomy between 2000 and 2003 were enrolled for this study as a rehabilitation group (  Rehab . Group ) . The criteria of COPD were preoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1)/forced vital capacity ( FVC ) < or = 70 % and more than 50 % of low attenuation area in a computed tomography . Preoperatively patients performed aggressive pulmonary exercise for two weeks and received chest physiotherapy postoperatively .  As a historical control , 60 patients with lung cancer who fulfilled the same criteria but did not receive rehabilitation between 1995 and 1999 ( control group ) were entered in this study . RESULTS Patient background s were all equivalent between the two groups . However , FEV1 and FEV1/FVC were significantly lower in the Rehab . Group ( p < 0.05 ) . Prolonged oxygen supplement and tracheostomy tended to be more frequent in the control group . The ratio of actual postoperative to predicted postoperative FEV1 was significantly better in the Rehab . Group ( p = 0.047 ) . Furthermore , postoperative hospital stay was significantly longer in the control group ( p = 0.0003 ) . CONCLUSION Despite lower FEV1 and FEV1/FVC in the Rehab . Group , postoperative pulmonary complications and long hospital stay could be effectively prevented and FEV1 was well preserved by rehabilitation and physiotherapy
High-intensity interval training ( HIT ) with duration of 2 to 6 weeks seems to be the best exercise programme in a prehabilitation intervention but it exists heterogeneity in terms of intensity and duration .
Prehabilitation increase exercise capacity and significantly enhances pulmonary function .
But the reduction of postoperative complication and mortality has not been clearly demonstrated .
It seems that not all patients can benefit from prehabilitation and it could be indicated only in patients with impaired lung function .
Meanwhile , safety of prehabilitation and good results of some studies support this intervention in high-risk patients
Surgical resection remains the best treatment option for patients with early stage of non-small cell lung cancer ( NSCLC ) .
However , it may be responsible of postoperative complication and mortality , especially in patients with impaired pulmonary function .
Enhanced recovery after surgery ( ERAS ) programs have been focused mainly in minimal invasive surgery approach during lung resection and respiratory rehabilitation after surgery .
Preoperative exercise-based intervention ( prehabilitation ) has demonstrated reduction of morbi-mortality in other surgeries but in thoracic surgery continues to be under discussion .
Cardio-pulmonary exercise test ( CPET ) is the gold st and ard technique to predict postoperative morbi-mortality .
The implementation of a preoperative respiratory rehabilitation could optimize patient 's physical capacity before surgery and improve outcomes and enhance recovery .
The aim of this systematic review of the literature is to identify the effectiveness and safety of prehabilitation programs in thoracic surgery , the type of exercise and its duration , and the group of patients with best benefit .
Prehabilitation is a safe intervention without side effects in patients .