R and om-effects meta-analyses showed that post-operative functional outcomes were comparable between active robotic and conventional total hip and knee arthroplasty at the short- , medium- and long-term follow-up .
Conclusions This systematic and meta-analyses indicates that functional outcomes for patients undergoing active robotic total hip and knee arthroplasty were comparable to conventional surgery .
Whether semi-active or active robotic hip or knee arthroplasty is effective in improving post-operative pain , quality of life and satisfaction with surgery is unclear .
Purpose The purpose of the study is to determine the effectiveness of semi-active and active robotic hip and knee arthroplasty on post-operative patient-reported outcomes of function , pain , quality of life and satisfaction with surgery .
A Comparison between Robotic-assisted and Manual Implantation of Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty
Background The benefits of robotic techniques for implanting femoral components during THA are still controversial . Questions / Purpose sThe purpose of this study was to prospect ively compare the results and complications of robotic-assisted and h and -rasping stem implantation techniques . Method The minimum followup was 5 years ( mean , 67 months ; range , 60–85 months ) . One hundred forty-six primary THAs on 130 patients were included in this study .  Robot-assisted primary THA was performed on 75 hips and a h and -rasping technique was used on 71 hips . Results At 2 and 3 years postoperatively , the Japanese Orthopaedic Association ( JOA ) clinical score was slightly better in the robotic-assisted group . At 5 years followup , however , the differences were not significant . Postoperative limb lengths of the robotic-milling group had significantly less variance than the h and -rasping group . At 2 years postoperatively , there was significantly more stress shielding of the proximal femur in the h and -rasping group ; this difference was more significant 5 years postoperatively . Conclusions Substantially more precise implant positioning seems to have led to less variance in limb-length ine quality and less stress shielding of the proximal femur 5 years postoperatively . Level of Evidence Level II , therapeutic study . See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence
R and om-effects meta-analyses showed that post-operative functional outcomes were comparable between active robotic and conventional total hip and knee arthroplasty at the short- , medium- and long-term follow-up .
Conclusions This systematic and meta-analyses indicates that functional outcomes for patients undergoing active robotic total hip and knee arthroplasty were comparable to conventional surgery .
Whether semi-active or active robotic hip or knee arthroplasty is effective in improving post-operative pain , quality of life and satisfaction with surgery is unclear .
Purpose The purpose of the study is to determine the effectiveness of semi-active and active robotic hip and knee arthroplasty on post-operative patient-reported outcomes of function , pain , quality of life and satisfaction with surgery .