D. Restoration of sinus rhythm for monophasic vs. biphasic waveforms .
Another study showed that PVI result ed in long-term restoration
Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is a major public health problem in the United States .
More than 2.3 million Americans are estimated to have AF ( 1 ) .
The known association between AF and substantial mortality , morbidity , and health care costs compounds the effect of this condition .
Not only is the risk for death in patients with AF twice that of patients without it , but AF can result in myocardial ischemia and infa rct ion , exacerbate heart failure ( HF ) , and cause tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy if the ventricular rate is not well-controlled ( 25 ) .
The most dreaded complication of AF is thromboembolism , especially stroke ( 6 ) .
In some patients , AF or therapies to manage this condition can severely depreciate quality of life ( 710 ) .
Furthermore , the management of AF and its complications is responsible for nearly $ 16 billion in additional costs to the U.S. health care system per year ( 11 ) .
We conducted this systematic review to evaluate the comparative safety and effectiveness of rate- versus rhythm-control strategies ;  medications used for ventricular rate control ; strict versus more lenient rate-control strategies ; nonpharmacologic rate-control therapies  versus medications ; electrical cardioversion and antiarrhythmic medications  for restoration of sinus rhythm ;  and  catheter ablation , surgical ablation , and antiarrhythmic medications  for maintenance of sinus rhythm .
Comparison of cool tip versus 8-mm tip catheter in achieving electrical isolation of pulmonary veins for long-term control of atrial fibrillation: a prospective randomized pilot study.
OBJECTIVE To compare safety and efficacy of 8-mm versus cooled tip catheter in achieving electrical isolation ( EI ) of pulmonary veins ( PV ) for long-term control of  atrial fibrillation ( AF ) .  BACKGROUND There is paucity of studies comparing safety/efficacy of 8-mm and cooled tip catheters in patients undergoing AF ablation . METHODS AND RESULTS This was a r and omized and patient-blinded study . Subjects were followed by clinic visits ( at 6 weeks and 6 months ) and transtelephonic monitoring ( 3-week duration ) done around each visit . Primary endpoints were : ( 1 ) long-term AF control ( complete freedom and /or > 90 % reduction in AF burden on or off antiarrhythmic drugs at 6 months after a single ablation ) , and ( 2 ) occurrence of serious adverse events ( cardiac tamponade , stroke , LA-esophageal fistula , and /or death ) .  Eighty-two patients ( age 56 + /- 9 years , 60 males , paroxysmal AF = 59 ) were r and omized ( 42 patients to 8-mm tip and 40 patients to cooled tip ) . EI of PVs was achieved in shorter time by the 8-mm tip as compared with cooled tip catheter ( 40 + /- 23 minutes vs 50 + /- 30 minutes ; P < 0.05 ) but long-term AF control was not different between the two ( 32 patients [ 78 % ] vs 28 patients [ 70 % ] , respectively ; P = NS ) . One serious adverse event occurred in each group ( LA-esophageal fistula and stroke , respectively ) and no significant PV stenosis was observed in either . CONCLUSION EI of PVs using either 8-mm or cooled tip catheter results in long-term AF control in the majority after a single ablation procedure , with comparable efficacy and safety
D. Restoration of sinus rhythm for monophasic vs. biphasic waveforms .
Another study showed that PVI result ed in long-term restoration
Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is a major public health problem in the United States .
More than 2.3 million Americans are estimated to have AF ( 1 ) .
The known association between AF and substantial mortality , morbidity , and health care costs compounds the effect of this condition .
Not only is the risk for death in patients with AF twice that of patients without it , but AF can result in myocardial ischemia and infa rct ion , exacerbate heart failure ( HF ) , and cause tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy if the ventricular rate is not well-controlled ( 25 ) .
The most dreaded complication of AF is thromboembolism , especially stroke ( 6 ) .
In some patients , AF or therapies to manage this condition can severely depreciate quality of life ( 710 ) .
Furthermore , the management of AF and its complications is responsible for nearly $ 16 billion in additional costs to the U.S. health care system per year ( 11 ) .
We conducted this systematic review to evaluate the comparative safety and effectiveness of rate- versus rhythm-control strategies ;  medications used for ventricular rate control ; strict versus more lenient rate-control strategies ; nonpharmacologic rate-control therapies  versus medications ; electrical cardioversion and antiarrhythmic medications  for restoration of sinus rhythm ;  and  catheter ablation , surgical ablation , and antiarrhythmic medications  for maintenance of sinus rhythm .