Women taking HT had a significantly decreased incidence of fracture with long-term use .
Research ers found no strong evidence that HT has a clinical ly meaningful impact on the incidence of colorectal cancer .
AUTHORS ' CONCLUSIONS : Women with intolerable menopausal symptoms may wish to weigh the benefits of symptom relief against the small absolute risk of harm arising from short-term use of low-dose HT , provided they do not have specific contraindications .
HT may be unsuitable for some women , including those at increased risk of cardiovascular disease , increased risk of thromboembolic disease ( such as those with obesity or a history of venous thrombosis ) or increased risk of some types of cancer ( such as breast cancer , in women with a uterus ) .
The risk of endometrial cancer among women with a uterus taking oestrogen-only HT is well documented .
HT is not indicated for primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease or dementia , nor for prevention of deterioration of cognitive function in postmenopausal women .
Although HT is considered effective for the prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis , it is generally recommended as an option only for women at significant risk for whom non-oestrogen therapies are unsuitable .
BACKGROUND : Hormone therapy ( HT ) is widely provided for control of menopausal symptoms and has been used for the management and prevention of cardiovascular disease , osteoporosis and  dementia in older women .
This is an up date d version of a Cochrane review first published in 2005 .
OBJECTIVES : To assess effects of long-term HT ( at least 1 year 's duration ) on mortality , cardiovascular outcomes , cancer , gallbladder disease , fracture and cognition in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women during and after cessation of treatment .
Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: Principal results from the Women's Health Initiative randomized controlled trial
CONTEXT Despite decades of accumulated observational evidence , the balance of risks and benefits for hormone use in healthy postmenopausal women remains uncertain . OBJECTIVE To assess the major health benefits and risks of the most commonly used combined hormone preparation in the United States . DESIGN Estrogen plus progestin component of the Women 's Health Initiative , a r and omized controlled primary prevention trial ( planned duration , 8.5 years ) in which 16608 postmenopausal women aged 50 - 79 years with an intact uterus at baseline were recruited by 40 US clinical centers in 1993 - 1998 . INTERVENTIONS Participants received conjugated equine estrogens , 0.625 mg/d , plus medroxyprogesterone acetate , 2.5 mg/d , in 1 tablet ( n = 8506 ) or placebo ( n = 8102 ) . MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES The primary outcome was coronary heart disease ( CHD ) ( nonfatal myocardial infa rct ion and CHD death ) , with invasive breast cancer as the primary adverse outcome . A global index summarizing the balance of risks and benefits included the 2 primary outcomes plus stroke , pulmonary embolism ( PE ) , endometrial cancer , colorectal cancer , hip fracture , and death due to other causes . RESULTS On May 31 , 2002 , after a mean of 5.2 years of follow-up , the data and safety monitoring board recommended stopping the trial of estrogen plus progestin vs placebo because the test statistic for invasive breast cancer exceeded the stopping boundary for this adverse effect and the global index statistic supported risks exceeding benefits . This report includes data on the major clinical outcomes through April 30 , 2002 . Estimated hazard ratios ( HRs ) ( nominal 95 % confidence intervals [ CIs ] ) were as follows : CHD , 1.29 ( 1.02 - 1.63 ) with 286 cases ; breast cancer , 1.26 ( 1.00 - 1.59 ) with 290 cases ; stroke , 1.41 ( 1.07 - 1.85 ) with 212 cases ; PE , 2.13 ( 1.39 - 3.25 ) with 101 cases ; colorectal cancer , 0.63 ( 0.43 - 0.92 ) with 112 cases ; endometrial cancer , 0.83 ( 0.47 - 1.47 ) with 47 cases ; hip fracture , 0.66 ( 0.45 - 0.98 ) with 106 cases ; and death due to other causes , 0.92 ( 0.74 - 1.14 ) with 331 cases . Corresponding HRs ( nominal 95 % CIs ) for composite outcomes were 1.22 ( 1.09 - 1.36 ) for total cardiovascular disease ( arterial and venous disease ) , 1.03 ( 0.90 - 1.17 ) for total cancer , 0.76 ( 0.69 - 0.85 ) for combined fractures , 0.98 ( 0.82 - 1.18 ) for total mortality , and 1.15 ( 1.03 - 1.28 ) for the global index . Absolute excess risks per 10 000 person-years attributable to estrogen plus progestin were 7 more CHD events , 8 more strokes , 8 more PEs , and 8 more invasive breast cancers , while absolute risk reductions per 10 000 person-years were 6 fewer colorectal cancers and 5 fewer hip fractures . The absolute excess risk of events included in the global index was 19 per 10 000 person-years . CONCLUSIONS Overall health risks exceeded benefits from use of combined estrogen plus progestin for an average 5.2-year follow-up among healthy postmenopausal US women .  All-cause mortality was not affected during the trial . The risk-benefit profile found in this trial is not consistent with the requirements for a viable intervention for primary prevention of chronic diseases , and the results indicate that this regimen should not be initiated or continued for primary prevention of CHD
Women taking HT had a significantly decreased incidence of fracture with long-term use .
Research ers found no strong evidence that HT has a clinical ly meaningful impact on the incidence of colorectal cancer .
AUTHORS ' CONCLUSIONS : Women with intolerable menopausal symptoms may wish to weigh the benefits of symptom relief against the small absolute risk of harm arising from short-term use of low-dose HT , provided they do not have specific contraindications .
HT may be unsuitable for some women , including those at increased risk of cardiovascular disease , increased risk of thromboembolic disease ( such as those with obesity or a history of venous thrombosis ) or increased risk of some types of cancer ( such as breast cancer , in women with a uterus ) .
The risk of endometrial cancer among women with a uterus taking oestrogen-only HT is well documented .
HT is not indicated for primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease or dementia , nor for prevention of deterioration of cognitive function in postmenopausal women .
Although HT is considered effective for the prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis , it is generally recommended as an option only for women at significant risk for whom non-oestrogen therapies are unsuitable .
BACKGROUND : Hormone therapy ( HT ) is widely provided for control of menopausal symptoms and has been used for the management and prevention of cardiovascular disease , osteoporosis and  dementia in older women .
This is an up date d version of a Cochrane review first published in 2005 .
OBJECTIVES : To assess effects of long-term HT ( at least 1 year 's duration ) on mortality , cardiovascular outcomes , cancer , gallbladder disease , fracture and cognition in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women during and after cessation of treatment .