Where data were available , the relative benefits seen held true both after a single or multiple procedure(s ) .
For patients with persistent atrial fibrillation , CA achieves significantly greater freedom from recurrent atrial fibrillation compared with medical therapy .
BACKGROUND Catheter ablation ( CA ) is commonly performed for persistent atrial fibrillation , but few high- quality r and omized controlled trials ( RCTs ) exist , leading to funding restrictions being proposed in several countries .
We performed a r and om-effects meta- analysis of RCTs and non- RCTs to assess the efficacy of CA for persistent atrial fibrillation .
Left Atrial Posterior Wall Isolation Does Not Improve the Outcome of Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Prospective Randomized Study
Background —Ablation of the pulmonary veins ( PVs ) for atrial fibrillation treatment is often combined with linear radiofrequency lesions along the left atrium ( LA ) to improve the success rate . The study was design ed to assess the contribution of LA posterior wall isolation to the outcome of circumferential pulmonary vein ablation ( CPVA ) . Methods and Results —CPVA consisted of continuous radiofrequency lesions encircling both ipsilateral PVs plus an ablation line along the mitral isthmus . Patients were then r and omized into 2 groups . In the first group , superior PVs were connected by linear lesions along the LA roof ( CPVA-1 group ) . In the second group , the LA posterior wall was isolated by adding a second line connecting the inferior aspect of the 2 inferior PVs ( CPVA-2 group ) . The study included 120 patients ( 53±11 years , 77 % male , 60 % paroxysmal atrial fibrillation , LA of 41.3±5.4 mm , 46 % with hypertension , and 22 % with structural heart disease ) . After a single ablation procedure and a mean follow-up of 10±4 months , 24 ( 40 % ) patients of the CPVA-1 group had atrial fibrillation recurrences and 3 ( 5 % ) had new-onset LA flutter . In the CPVA-2  group , recurrences were due to atrial fibrillation episodes in 23 patients ( 38 % ) and LA flutter in 4 ( 7 % ) . Freedom from arrhythmia recurrences was not statistically different in the CPVA-1 group as compared with the CPVA-2 group ( log rank P=0.943 ) . Conclusion —Isolation of the LA posterior wall did not increase the success rate of CPVA
Where data were available , the relative benefits seen held true both after a single or multiple procedure(s ) .
For patients with persistent atrial fibrillation , CA achieves significantly greater freedom from recurrent atrial fibrillation compared with medical therapy .
BACKGROUND Catheter ablation ( CA ) is commonly performed for persistent atrial fibrillation , but few high- quality r and omized controlled trials ( RCTs ) exist , leading to funding restrictions being proposed in several countries .
We performed a r and om-effects meta- analysis of RCTs and non- RCTs to assess the efficacy of CA for persistent atrial fibrillation .