Data showed improvements secondary to exercise in ' physical function ' and ' general health ' .
The other domains - ' role physical ' , ' bodily pain ' , ' vitality ' , ' social ' , ' role emotional ' , and ' mental health ' - did not show improvement at six months .
Although results showed significant heterogeneity between trials , population s and outcomes were comparable overall , with findings relevant to the claudicant population .
High- quality evidence shows that exercise programmes provided important benefit compared with placebo or usual care in improving both pain-free and maximum walking distance in people with leg pain from IC who were considered to be fit for exercise intervention .
Exercise did not improve ABI , and we found no evidence of an effect of exercise on amputation or mortality .
Exercise may improve quality of life when compared with placebo or usual care .
BACKGROUND Exercise programmes are a relatively inexpensive , low-risk option compared with other , more invasive therapies for treatment of leg pain on walking ( intermittent claudication ( IC ) ) .
This is the fourth up date of a review first published in 1998 .
OBJECTIVES Our goal was to determine whether an exercise programme was effective in alleviating symptoms and increasing walking treadmill distances and walking times in people with intermittent claudication .
Secondary objectives were to determine whether exercise was effective in preventing deterioration of underlying disease , reducing cardiovascular events , and improving quality of life .
Supervised Exercise Versus Primary Stenting for Claudication Resulting From Aortoiliac Peripheral Artery Disease: Six-Month Outcomes From the Claudication Exercise Versus Endoluminal Revascularization (CLEVER) Study
Background — Claudication is a common and disabling symptom of peripheral artery disease that can be treated with medication , supervised exercise ( SE ) , or stent revascularization ( ST ) . Methods and Results — We r and omly assigned 111 patients with aortoiliac peripheral artery disease to receive 1 of 3 treatments : optimal medical care ( OMC ) , OMC plus SE , or OMC plus ST . The primary end point was the change in peak walking time on a grade d treadmill test at 6 months compared with baseline . Secondary end points included free-living step activity , quality of life with the Walking Impairment Question naire , Peripheral Artery Question naire , Medical Outcomes Study 12-Item Short Form , and cardiovascular risk factors . At the 6-month follow-up , change in peak walking time ( the primary end point ) was greatest for SE , intermediate for ST , and least with OMC ( mean change versus baseline , 5.8±4.6 , 3.7±4.9 , and 1.2±2.6 minutes , respectively ; P<0.001 for the comparison of SE versus OMC , P=0.02 for ST versus OMC , and P=0.04 for SE versus ST ) . Although disease-specific quality of life as assessed by the Walking Impairment Question naire and Peripheral Artery Question naire also improved with both SE and ST compared with OMC , for most scales , the extent of improvement was greater with ST than SE . Free-living step activity increased more with ST than with either SE or OMC alone ( 114±274 versus 73±139 versus −6±109 steps per hour ) , but these differences were not statistically significant . Conclusions — SE results in superior treadmill walking performance than ST , even for those with aortoiliac peripheral artery disease . The contrast between better walking performance for SE and better patient-reported quality of life for ST warrants further study . Clinical Trial Registration — URL : http:// clinical trials.gov/ct/show/NCT00132743?order=1 . Unique identifier : NCT00132743
Data showed improvements secondary to exercise in ' physical function ' and ' general health ' .
The other domains - ' role physical ' , ' bodily pain ' , ' vitality ' , ' social ' , ' role emotional ' , and ' mental health ' - did not show improvement at six months .
Although results showed significant heterogeneity between trials , population s and outcomes were comparable overall , with findings relevant to the claudicant population .
High- quality evidence shows that exercise programmes provided important benefit compared with placebo or usual care in improving both pain-free and maximum walking distance in people with leg pain from IC who were considered to be fit for exercise intervention .
Exercise did not improve ABI , and we found no evidence of an effect of exercise on amputation or mortality .
Exercise may improve quality of life when compared with placebo or usual care .
BACKGROUND Exercise programmes are a relatively inexpensive , low-risk option compared with other , more invasive therapies for treatment of leg pain on walking ( intermittent claudication ( IC ) ) .
This is the fourth up date of a review first published in 1998 .
OBJECTIVES Our goal was to determine whether an exercise programme was effective in alleviating symptoms and increasing walking treadmill distances and walking times in people with intermittent claudication .
Secondary objectives were to determine whether exercise was effective in preventing deterioration of underlying disease , reducing cardiovascular events , and improving quality of life .