Group refunds , deposit not paid as lump sum , participants setting their own deposit size and additional behaviour change techniques were associated with greater weight loss during treatment .
Post-treatment , there was no significant effect of MCCs on weight loss .
There was a significant small-to-medium effect of MCCs on participant retention during treatment .
Research er-set deposits paid as one lump sum , refunds delivered on an all-or-nothing basis and refunds contingent on attendance at classes were associated with greater retention during treatment .
Post-treatment , there was no significant effect of MCCs on participant retention .
The results support the use of MCCs to promote weight loss and participant retention up to the point that the incentive is removed and identifies the conditions under which MCCs work best
Financial incentives to improve health have received increasing attention , but are subject to ethical concerns .
Monetary Contingency Contracts ( MCCs ) , which require individuals to deposit money that is refunded contingent on reaching a goal , are a potential alternative strategy .
This review evaluates systematic ally the evidence for weight loss – related MCCs .
Behavioral techniques in the treatment of obesity: a comparative analysis.
Abstract The relative efficacy of the major techniques typically used in behavioral treatment programs for weight reduction was investigated using obese adult volunteers . Study 1 compared the effects of self-monitoring , self-control procedures , monetary rewards , aversive imagery and relaxation training . These procedures result ed in significantly greater weight reduction than either a no treatment group or subjects who graphed and recorded daily weight . Self-monitoring of daily caloric intake was as effective as the other methods , both singly and combined , over a 4 week treatment period . Study 2 compared the long-term effects of self-monitoring vs the full complement of behavioral techniques used in Study 1 . The full behavior management program was significantly more effective , both during the treatment period and at 3 and 12 week follow-ups , although self-monitoring again produced substantial weight loss
Group refunds , deposit not paid as lump sum , participants setting their own deposit size and additional behaviour change techniques were associated with greater weight loss during treatment .
Post-treatment , there was no significant effect of MCCs on weight loss .
There was a significant small-to-medium effect of MCCs on participant retention during treatment .
Research er-set deposits paid as one lump sum , refunds delivered on an all-or-nothing basis and refunds contingent on attendance at classes were associated with greater retention during treatment .
Post-treatment , there was no significant effect of MCCs on participant retention .
The results support the use of MCCs to promote weight loss and participant retention up to the point that the incentive is removed and identifies the conditions under which MCCs work best
Financial incentives to improve health have received increasing attention , but are subject to ethical concerns .
Monetary Contingency Contracts ( MCCs ) , which require individuals to deposit money that is refunded contingent on reaching a goal , are a potential alternative strategy .
This review evaluates systematic ally the evidence for weight loss – related MCCs .