Intervention-only programmes were in general more cost effective than programmes that also included a screening component .
The longer the period evaluated , the more cost-effective interventions appeared .
There was insufficient evidence to answer the question of ( 1 ) whether lifestyle programmes are more cost effective than metformin or ( 2 ) whether low-intensity lifestyle interventions are more cost effective than the more intensive lifestyle programmes that were tested in trials .
OBJECTIVE Explore the cost-effectiveness of lifestyle interventions and metformin in reducing subsequent incidence of type 2 diabetes  , both alone and in combination with a screening programme to identify high-risk individuals .
Prevention of type 2 diabetes in adults with impaired glucose tolerance: the European Diabetes Prevention RCT in Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
Abstract Background Diabetes prevalence is increasing . The Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study ( DPS ) showed a 58 % reduction in Type 2 Diabetes ( T2D ) incidence in adults with impaired glucose tolerance ( IGT ) . The European Diabetes Prevention Study ( EDIPS ) extends the DPS to different European population s , using the same study design . In the Newcastle arm of this study ( EDIPS-Newcastle ) , we tested the hypothesis that T2D can be prevented by lifestyle intervention and explored secondary outcomes in relation to diabetes incidence . Methods We recruited 102 participants ( 42 men and 60 women , mean age 57 years , mean BMI 34 kgm-2 ) with IGT to EDIPS-Newcastle and r and omised to Intervention and usual care Control groups .  The intervention included individual motivational interviewing aim ed at : weight reduction , increase in physical activity , fibre and carbohydrate intake and reduction of fat intake ( secondary outcomes ) . The primary outcome was diagnosis of T2D . Results Mean duration of follow-up was 3.1 years . T2D was diagnosed in 16 participants ( I = 5 , C = 11 ) . Absolute incidence of T2D was 32.7 per 1000 person-years in the Intervention-group and 67.1 per 1000 person-years in the Control-group . The overall incidence of diabetes was reduced by 55 % in the Intervention-group , compared with the Control-group : RR 0.45 ( 95%CI 0.2 to 1.2).Explanatory survival analysis of secondary outcomes showed that those who sustained beneficial changes for two or more years reduced their risk of developing T2D . Conclusion Our results are consistent with other diabetes prevention trials . This study was design ed as part of a larger study and although the sample size limits statistical significance , the results contribute to the evidence that T2D can be prevented by lifestyle changes in adults with IGT . In explanatory analysis small sustained beneficial changes in weight , physical activity or dietary factors were associated with reduction in T2D incidence . Trial Registration International St and ard R and omised Controlled Trial Number registry ( IS RCT N)Registry number : IS RCT N 15670600 http://www.controlled-trials.com/is rct n/ search .html?srch=15670600%26sort=3%26dir =
Intervention-only programmes were in general more cost effective than programmes that also included a screening component .
The longer the period evaluated , the more cost-effective interventions appeared .
There was insufficient evidence to answer the question of ( 1 ) whether lifestyle programmes are more cost effective than metformin or ( 2 ) whether low-intensity lifestyle interventions are more cost effective than the more intensive lifestyle programmes that were tested in trials .
OBJECTIVE Explore the cost-effectiveness of lifestyle interventions and metformin in reducing subsequent incidence of type 2 diabetes  , both alone and in combination with a screening programme to identify high-risk individuals .