Mirtazapine was significantly more effective than a serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor ( venlafaxine only , two trials , n = 415 ) at two weeks ( OR 2.29 , 95 % CI 1.45 to 3.59 ) and at the end of acute-phase treatment ( OR 1.53 , 95 % CI 1.03 to 2.25).In terms of dropouts , there was no robust evidence to detect a difference between mirtazapine and other antidepressants .
Mirtazapine was more likely to cause weight gain or increased appetite and somnolence than SSRIs but less likely to cause nausea or vomiting and sexual dysfunction .
AUTHORS ' CONCLUSIONS Some statistically significant and possibly clinical ly meaningful differences between mirtazapine and other antidepressive agents were found for the acute-phase treatment of major depression .
Mirtazapine is likely to have a faster onset of action than SSRIs during the acute-phase treatment .
Dropouts occur similarly in participants treated with mirtazapine and those treated with other antidepressants , although the adverse event profile of mirtazapine is unique
BACKGROUND Mirtazapine has a unique mechanism of antidepressive action and is one of the commonly used antidepressants in clinical practice .
OBJECTIVES The aim of the present review was to assess the evidence on the efficacy and acceptability of mirtazapine compared with other antidepressive agents in the acute-phase treatment of major depression in adults .
Evaluation of outcomes with citalopram for depression using measurement-based care in STAR*D: implications for clinical practice.
OBJECTIVE Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors ( SSRIs ) are widely used to treat depression , but the rates , timing , and baseline predictors of remission in " real world " patients are not established . The authors ' primary objectives in this study were to evaluate the effectiveness of citalopram , an SSRI , using measurement-based care in actual practice , and to identify predictors of symptom remission in out patients with major depressive disorder . METHOD This clinical study included out patients with major depressive disorder who were treated in 23 psychiatric and 18 primary care " real world " setting s. The patients received flexible doses of citalopram prescribed by clinicians for up to 14 weeks . The clinicians were assisted by a clinical research coordinator in the application of measurement-based care , which included the routine measurement of symptoms and side effects at each treatment visit and the use of a treatment manual that described when and how to modify medication doses based on these measures . Remission was defined as an exit score of < or=7 on the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale ( HAM-D ) ( primary outcome ) or a score of < or=5 on the 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology , Self-Report ( QIDS-SR ) ( secondary outcome ) . Response was defined as a reduction of > or=50 % in baseline QIDS-SR score . RESULTS Nearly 80 % of the 2,876 out patients in the analyzed sample had chronic or recurrent major depression ; most also had a number of comorbid general medical and psychiatric conditions . The mean exit citalopram dose was 41.8 mg/day . Remission rates were 28 % ( HAM-D ) and 33 % ( QIDS-SR ) . The response rate was 47 % ( QIDS-SR ) . Patients in primary and psychiatric care setting s did not differ in remission or response rates . A substantial portion of participants who achieved either response or remission at study exit did so at or after 8 weeks of treatment . Participants who were Caucasian , female , employed , or had higher levels of education or income had higher HAM-D remission rates ; longer index episodes , more concurrent psychiatric disorders ( especially anxiety disorders or drug abuse ) , more general medical disorders , and lower baseline function and quality of life were associated with lower HAM-D remission rates . CONCLUSIONS The response and remission rates in this highly generalizable sample with substantial axis I and axis III comorbidity closely resemble those seen in 8-week efficacy trials . The systematic use of easily implemented measurement-based care procedures may have assisted in achieving these results
Mirtazapine was significantly more effective than a serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor ( venlafaxine only , two trials , n = 415 ) at two weeks ( OR 2.29 , 95 % CI 1.45 to 3.59 ) and at the end of acute-phase treatment ( OR 1.53 , 95 % CI 1.03 to 2.25).In terms of dropouts , there was no robust evidence to detect a difference between mirtazapine and other antidepressants .
Mirtazapine was more likely to cause weight gain or increased appetite and somnolence than SSRIs but less likely to cause nausea or vomiting and sexual dysfunction .
AUTHORS ' CONCLUSIONS Some statistically significant and possibly clinical ly meaningful differences between mirtazapine and other antidepressive agents were found for the acute-phase treatment of major depression .
Mirtazapine is likely to have a faster onset of action than SSRIs during the acute-phase treatment .
Dropouts occur similarly in participants treated with mirtazapine and those treated with other antidepressants , although the adverse event profile of mirtazapine is unique
BACKGROUND Mirtazapine has a unique mechanism of antidepressive action and is one of the commonly used antidepressants in clinical practice .
OBJECTIVES The aim of the present review was to assess the evidence on the efficacy and acceptability of mirtazapine compared with other antidepressive agents in the acute-phase treatment of major depression in adults .