We found no significant differences between different types of drains .
Drains increase the harms to the patient without providing any additional benefit for patients undergoing open cholecystectomy and should be avoided in open cholecystectomy
BACKGROUND Cholecystectomy is the removal of gallbladder and is performed mainly for symptomatic gallstones .
Although laparoscopic cholecystectomy is currently preferred over open cholecystectomy for elective cholecystectomy , reports of r and omised clinical trials comparing the choice of cholecystectomy ( open or laparoscopic ) in acute cholecystitis are still being conducted .
Drainage in open cholecystectomy is a matter of considerable debate .
Surgeons use drains primarily to prevent subhepatic abscess or bile peritonitis from an undrained bile leak .
Critics of drain condemn drain use as it increases wound and chest infection .
OBJECTIVES To assess the benefits and harms of routine abdominal drainage in uncomplicated open cholecystectomy .
Abdominal Drainage Following Appendectomy and Cholecystectomy
Consecutive patients undergoing emergency appendectomy ( 283 ) or urgent cholecystectomy ( 51 ) were prospect ively studied for the development of postoperative incisional or peritoneal sepsis . Severity of the original peritoneal infection was carefully recorded , while use of a Penrose dam to drain the peritoneum was r and omized according to pre-assigned hospital number . Both aerobic and anaerobic cultures were taken from the abdomen at the time of operation as well as from all postoperative infectious foci . Results demonstrated no essential differences in incidence of wound and peritoneal infection following  appendectomy  for simple or suppurative appendicitis ( 187 ) or following  cholecystectomy  for acute cholecystitis ( 51 ) . However , with gangrenous or perforative appendicitis ( 94 ) , incisional and intra-abdominal infection rates were 43 % and 45 % , respectively , when a drain was used ; yet only 29 and 13 % , respectively , without a drain . These latter differences were significant ( p < 0.001 ) . In addition , intra-abdominal abscesses were three times as likely to drain through the incision than along any tract provided by the rubber conduit . Cultures revealed that hospital pathogens accounted for a greater proportion of wound and peritoneal sepsis after cholecystectomy and appendectomy for simple or suppurative appendicitis if a drain had been inserted than if managed otherwise . By contrast , a mixed bacterial flora was responsible for most infections following appendectomy for gangrenous or perforated appendicitis , irrespective as to use of a drain
We found no significant differences between different types of drains .
Drains increase the harms to the patient without providing any additional benefit for patients undergoing open cholecystectomy and should be avoided in open cholecystectomy
BACKGROUND Cholecystectomy is the removal of gallbladder and is performed mainly for symptomatic gallstones .
Although laparoscopic cholecystectomy is currently preferred over open cholecystectomy for elective cholecystectomy , reports of r and omised clinical trials comparing the choice of cholecystectomy ( open or laparoscopic ) in acute cholecystitis are still being conducted .
Drainage in open cholecystectomy is a matter of considerable debate .
Surgeons use drains primarily to prevent subhepatic abscess or bile peritonitis from an undrained bile leak .
Critics of drain condemn drain use as it increases wound and chest infection .
OBJECTIVES To assess the benefits and harms of routine abdominal drainage in uncomplicated open cholecystectomy .