Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
A randomised controlled trial testing the feasibility and efficacy of a physical activity behavioural change intervention in managing fatigue with gynaecological cancer survivors.
OBJECTIVE To determine the feasibility and efficacy of a physical activity behavioural change intervention in managing cancer-related fatigue among gynaecological cancer survivors during and post anti-cancer treatments . METHODS A two arm , single blind , r and omised controlled trial was conducted within the Northern Irel and regional Cancer Centre . Thirty three sedentary gynaecological cancer survivors ( stage I-III ; ≤3 years post diagnosis ) , experiencing cancer-related fatigue ( mild-severe ) took part . Participants were r and omly assigned to a behavioural change , moderate intensity physical activity intervention ( n=16 ) or a Contact Control group ( n=17 ) . The primary outcome was fatigue ( Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory-Short Form and Functional Assessment in Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue subscale ) . Secondary outcomes included quality of life , physical functioning , positive and negative affect , depression , body composition , sleep dysfunction and self-reported physical activity . Feasibility was assessed based on the recruitment rate , programme and physical activity adherence and participants ' programme evaluation , including optional focus groups ( n=16 ) . RESULTS Twenty five percent of eligible women took part ( 33/134 ) . Participants were 8.7 ( SD=9.1 ) months post diagnosis , with a mean age of 53 ( SD=10.3 ) years . The majority of the sample had a diagnosis of ovarian ( n=12 ) or endometrial cancer ( n=11 ) . Significant differences favouring the intervention group were observed for fatigue at 12 weeks and 6 months follow-up ( 12 week : mean difference=-11.06 ; 95 % confidence interval (CI)=-21.89 to -0.23 ; effect size (d)=0.13 ; p=0.046 ; 6 month : mean difference=-19.48 ; 95 % CI=-19.67 to -19.15 ; effect size (d)=0.20 ; p=0.01 ) . A mean of 10 calls ( SD=1.2 calls ) were delivered to the Physical Activity Group , and 10 ( SD=1.6 calls ) to the CC group . The intervention was positively perceived based on exit question naire and focus group findings . CONCLUSIONS A physical activity behavioural change intervention for gynaecological cancer survivors is feasible in terms of participants ' programme adherence and evaluation , and the intervention demonstrates improvements in fatigue . However , confirmation in the form of a larger fully powered RCT is warranted
Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?