AND PRACTICAL IMPLICATION S Because new caries lesions in the margins of restorations are the main reason for failure and replacement of restorations in primary teeth , it is important to know whether there is a benefit in using GICs in both occlusal and occlusoproximal cavities
BACKGROUND Fluoride released from glass ionomer cements ( GICs ) is capable of preventing caries lesions .
However , the preventive effect in margins of occlusal and occlusoproximal restorations have not been proved .
Effects of oral hygiene, residual caries and cervical Marginal-gaps on the survival of proximal atraumatic restorative treatment approach restorations
Background : Although Atraumatic restorative treatment ( ART ) approach has been in existence for a while , the reasons for the poor performance of multisurface ART restorations are not very clear . Aim : The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of oral hygiene , residual caries and cervical marginal-gaps on survival of proximal ART restorations . Setting s : Two rural divisions in Kenya were selected for the study . Design : A r and omized clinical trial . Material and Methods : The 804 children in the study had their baseline- and 2-year dental plaque levels documented . Each child received one proximal restoration in a primary molar using ART approach , together with trained and pre-tested operators/assistants , three glass ionomer cements (GIC)-br and s and two tooth-isolation methods . The restorations were clinical ly evaluated soon after placement and after 2 years . Post-restorative bite-wing radiographs taken soon after restoration were also evaluated . Statistical analysis : Statistical Package for Social Sciences ( SPSS ) version 14 computer programme was used and results tested using Pearson 's correlation , Cox Proportional Hazards regression analysis and Multiple Logistic regression models tests . Results : At baseline and after 2 years , the mean cumulative survival and plaque index changed from 94.4 % to 30.8 % and 2.34 ( St and ard Deviation , or SD of 0.46 ) to 1.92 ( SD 2.1 ) respectively , with higher plaque indices associated with higher restoration failures . Of the 507 radiographs evaluated , 48 ( 9.5 % ) , 63 ( 12.4 % ) and 9 ( 1.8 % ) restorations had residual caries ( RC ) , cervical marginal-gaps ( CMG ) and both RC/CMG respectively . Survival of the restorations with RC/CMG was significantly lower ( p = 0.003 ) compared to those with RC or without RC . Conclusion : Low survival of proximal restorations in the study was associated with the presence of cervical marginal-gaps
AND PRACTICAL IMPLICATION S Because new caries lesions in the margins of restorations are the main reason for failure and replacement of restorations in primary teeth , it is important to know whether there is a benefit in using GICs in both occlusal and occlusoproximal cavities
BACKGROUND Fluoride released from glass ionomer cements ( GICs ) is capable of preventing caries lesions .
However , the preventive effect in margins of occlusal and occlusoproximal restorations have not been proved .