After the acute phase treatment , as long as the drug was continued , the superiority of the combination over either monotherapy appeared to persist .
BACKGROUND Panic disorder can be treated with pharmacotherapy , psychotherapy or in combination , but the relative merits of combined therapy have not been well established .
OBJECTIVES To review evidence concerning short- and long-term advantages and disadvantages of combined psychotherapy plus antidepressant treatment for panic disorder with or without agoraphobia , in comparison with either therapy alone .
Global measures of outcome in a controlled comparison of pharmacological and psychological treatment of panic disorder and agoraphobia in primary care.
BACKGROUND Panic disorder , with and without agoraphobia , is a prevalent condition which presents primarily in general practice . Previous clinical outcome studies have been conducted mainly in specialist university departments or hospital setting s , and have tended to employ complex rating scales that are not well suited for use as outcome measures in primary care . AIM To evaluate the outcome , in a primary care setting , of fluvoxamine versus cognitive behaviour therapy , each used alone and in combination in a double-blind placebo-controlled framework , balanced for therapist contact . METHOD A total of 149 patients satisfying DSMIII-R criteria for panic disorder were r and omly allocated to receive one of the following : fluvoxamine , placebo , fluvoxamine plus cognitive behaviour therapy , placebo plus cognitive behaviour therapy , and cognitive behaviour therapy alone . These five treatment groups represent the minimum number acceptable for such a comparison to be made . All patients received an identical schedule of contact over 13 weeks . Measures of symptom severity , general health and social disruption were taken at entry point and end point ; measures of change in symptoms were taken at end point only . Outcome was reported in terms of brief global ratings of severity of illness and change in symptoms , and of ratings of general health and social disruption that are suitable for use in general practice . RESULTS All active treatment groups showed statistically significant advantages over placebo over a range of outcome ratings . The groups employing cognitive behaviour therapy showed the most robust and consistent response . CONCLUSION The brief global measures reported here proved adequate to the task of assessing treatment outcome . Results indicate that treatments including cognitive behaviour therapy can be effective in the treatment of panic disorder and agoraphobia in primary care
After the acute phase treatment , as long as the drug was continued , the superiority of the combination over either monotherapy appeared to persist .
BACKGROUND Panic disorder can be treated with pharmacotherapy , psychotherapy or in combination , but the relative merits of combined therapy have not been well established .
OBJECTIVES To review evidence concerning short- and long-term advantages and disadvantages of combined psychotherapy plus antidepressant treatment for panic disorder with or without agoraphobia , in comparison with either therapy alone .