Conclusions and Relevance Although screening with ECG can detect previously unknown cases of atrial fibrillation , it has not been shown to detect more cases than screening focused on pulse palpation .
Treatments for atrial fibrillation reduce the risk of stroke and all-cause mortality and increase the risk of bleeding , but trials have not assessed whether treatment of screen-detected asymptomatic older adults results in better health outcomes than treatment after detection by usual care or after symptoms develop
Importance Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia and increases the risk of stroke .
Objective To review the evidence on screening for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation with electrocardiography ( ECG ) and stroke prevention treatment in asymptomatic adults 65 years or older to inform the US Preventive Services Task Force .
Screening versus routine practice in detection of atrial fibrillation in patients aged 65 or over: cluster randomised controlled trial
Objectives To assess whether screening improves the detection of atrial fibrillation  ( cluster r and omisation ) and to compare systematic and opportunistic screening . Design Multicentred cluster r and omised controlled trial , with subsidiary trial embedded within the intervention arm . Setting 50 primary care centres in Engl and , with further individual r and omisation of patients in the intervention practice s. Participants 14 802 patients aged 65 or over in 25 intervention and 25 control practice s. Interventions Patients in intervention practice s were r and omly allocated to systematic screening ( invitation for electrocardiography ) or opportunistic screening ( pulse taking and invitation for electrocardiography if the pulse was irregular ) . Screening took place over 12 months in each practice from October 2001 to February 2003 . No active screening took place in control practice s. Main outcome measure Newly identified atrial fibrillation . Results The detection rate of new cases of atrial fibrillation was 1.63 % a year in the intervention practice s and 1.04 % in control practice s ( difference 0.59 % , 95 % confidence interval 0.20 % to 0.98 % ) . Systematic and opportunistic screening detected similar numbers of new cases ( 1.62 % v 1.64 % , difference 0.02 % , −0.5 % to 0.5 % ) . Conclusion Active screening for atrial fibrillation detects additional cases over current practice . The preferred method of screening in patients aged 65 or over in primary care is opportunistic pulse taking with follow-up electrocardiography . Trial registration Current Controlled Trials IS RCT N19633732
Conclusions and Relevance Although screening with ECG can detect previously unknown cases of atrial fibrillation , it has not been shown to detect more cases than screening focused on pulse palpation .
Treatments for atrial fibrillation reduce the risk of stroke and all-cause mortality and increase the risk of bleeding , but trials have not assessed whether treatment of screen-detected asymptomatic older adults results in better health outcomes than treatment after detection by usual care or after symptoms develop
Importance Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia and increases the risk of stroke .
Objective To review the evidence on screening for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation with electrocardiography ( ECG ) and stroke prevention treatment in asymptomatic adults 65 years or older to inform the US Preventive Services Task Force .