Meta-analyses showed no clinical ly relevant differences in terms of revision rates , clinical outcome scores or patient-reported outcome measures between MB and FB TKRs .
It appears that theoretical assumptions of superiority of MB over FB TKR are not borne out in clinical practice
Mobile-bearing ( MB ) total knee replacement ( TKR ) was introduced to reduce the risk of aseptic loosening and wear of polyethylene inserts .
However , no consistent clinical advantages of mobile- over fixed-bearing ( FB ) TKR have been found .
In this study we evaluated whether mobile bearings have an advantage over fixed bearings with regard to revision rates and clinical outcome scores .
Furthermore , we determined which modifying variables affected the outcome .
Relationship between joint gap difference and range of motion in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomised study between different platforms
The objective of this study was to investigate the range of motion ( ROM ) of the knee before and four years after total knee arthroplasty ( TKA ) with a mobile or fixed type of platform and to prospect ively evaluate whether there was a difference in ligament balance between the platform types . The subjects were 68 patients involving 76 joints . The mobile type was used in 31 joints and fixed type in 45 joints by employing a prospect i ve r and omised method . The passive maximum ROM was measured using a goniometer before and four years after surgery . Also , the intraoperative knee ligament balance was measured . The postoperative extension ROM was significantly improved after TKA using a mobile bearing type compared with that employing a fixed bearing type . In TKA using the former , the intraoperative gap difference was not related to the postoperative flexion angle of the knee . However , they were related in TKA using a fixed bearing type , with a positive correlation regarding the flexion gap
Meta-analyses showed no clinical ly relevant differences in terms of revision rates , clinical outcome scores or patient-reported outcome measures between MB and FB TKRs .
It appears that theoretical assumptions of superiority of MB over FB TKR are not borne out in clinical practice
Mobile-bearing ( MB ) total knee replacement ( TKR ) was introduced to reduce the risk of aseptic loosening and wear of polyethylene inserts .
However , no consistent clinical advantages of mobile- over fixed-bearing ( FB ) TKR have been found .
In this study we evaluated whether mobile bearings have an advantage over fixed bearings with regard to revision rates and clinical outcome scores .
Furthermore , we determined which modifying variables affected the outcome .