Telemedicine had no convincing effect on quality of life , mortality or hypoglycemia .
INTERPRETATION : Compared with usual care , the addition of telemedicine , especially systems that allowed medication adjustments with or without text messaging or a Web portal , improved HbA1C but not other clinical ly relevant outcomes among patients with diabetes
BACKGROUND : Telemedicine , the use of telecommunications to deliver health services , expertise and information , is a promising but unproven tool for improving the quality of  diabetes care  .
We summarized the effectiveness of different methods of telemedicine for the management of diabetes compared with usual care .
Randomized effectiveness trial of a computer-assisted intervention to improve diabetes care.
OBJECTIVE There is a well-documented gap between diabetes care guidelines and the services received by patients in most health care setting s. This report presents 12-month follow-up results from a computer-assisted , patient-centered intervention to improve the level of recommended services patients received from a variety of primary care setting s. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A total of 886 patients with type 2 diabetes under the care of 52 primary care physicians participated in the Diabetes Priority Program . Physicians were stratified and r and omized to intervention or control conditions and evaluated on two primary outcomes : number of recommended laboratory screenings and recommended patient-centered care activities completed from the National Committee on Quality Assurance/American Diabetes Association Provider Recognition Program ( PRP ) . Secondary outcomes were evaluated using the Problem Areas in Diabetes 2 quality of life scale , lipid and HbA1c levels , and the Patient Health Question naire-9 depression scale . RESULTS The program was well implemented and significantly improved both the number of laboratory assays and patient-centered aspects of diabetes care patients received compared with those in the control condition . There was overall improvement on secondary outcomes of lipids , HbA1c , quality of life , and depression scores ; between-condition differences were not significant . CONCLUSIONS Staff in small , mixed-payer primary care offices can consistently implement a patient-centered intervention to improve PRP measures of quality of diabetes care . Alternative explanations for why these process improvements did not lead to improved outcomes , and suggested directions for future research are discussed
Telemedicine had no convincing effect on quality of life , mortality or hypoglycemia .
INTERPRETATION : Compared with usual care , the addition of telemedicine , especially systems that allowed medication adjustments with or without text messaging or a Web portal , improved HbA1C but not other clinical ly relevant outcomes among patients with diabetes
BACKGROUND : Telemedicine , the use of telecommunications to deliver health services , expertise and information , is a promising but unproven tool for improving the quality of  diabetes care  .
We summarized the effectiveness of different methods of telemedicine for the management of diabetes compared with usual care .