A clinical ly relevant but not statistically significant reduction in triglycerides was found .
No impact on HDL-C levels was found .
Patients ' adherence to pharmacotherapeutic regimens and quality of life were considered possibly not sensitive and possibly sensitive to pharmacist interventions , respectively .
Total cholesterol is sensitive to pharmacist interventions , while LDL-C and triglyceride levels are possibly sensitive to those interventions .
BACKGROUND Hyperlipidemia increases the risk of cardiovascular diseases , and control is pivotal for preventing disease complications .
Multidisciplinary interventions , including those performed by pharmacists , are important for improving patients ' outcomes .
OBJECTIVE To quantify the impact of pharmacist interventions in enhancing patients ' outcomes .
Clinical and humanistic outcomes of a lipid management program in the community pharmacy setting.
OBJECTIVES To identify patients at risk for coronary artery disease ( CAD ) through a search of a community pharmacy 's prescription data base , to screen and identify patients with elevated cholesterol and at risk for CAD , to enroll patients in a pharmacist-directed lipid management program , and to evaluate selected clinical and humanistic outcomes . DESIGN R and omized , pretest-posttest control groups . SETTING Independent community pharmacy in a suburban metropolitan area . PATIENTS 51 patients who were not at National Cholesterol Education Program low-density lipoprotein cholesterol ( LDL-C ) or defined triglyceride goals and who met inclusion criteria . INTERVENTION Pharmacist-directed lipid management program . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Clinical outcome measures included total cholesterol , LDL-C , high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ( HDL-C ) , and triglyceride levels ; achievement of LDL-C goal ; and risk factor prediction scores . Humanistic outcome measures included patient satisfaction with pharmaceutical care and patient knowledge of hyperlipidemia . RESULTS LDL-C was decreased in the pharmacist intervention group ( n = 25 ) , compared with an increase in the control group at study end . HDL-C levels increased and triglyceride levels decreased in both groups . Of treatment group patients , 32 % achieved their cholesterol goals , compared with 15 % of control group patients . Risk factor prediction scores improved in the treatment group and worsened in the control group . The treatment group 's hyperlipidemia knowledge scores improved significantly from pretest to posttest . Both treatment and control group patient satisfaction scores for the pharmacist investigator were favorable at study end . CONCLUSION Both treatment and control patients benefited from participating in this study . Patients enrolled in the lipid management program made greater improvements in their knowledge of hyperlipidemia , risk factor scores , and cholesterol levels
A clinical ly relevant but not statistically significant reduction in triglycerides was found .
No impact on HDL-C levels was found .
Patients ' adherence to pharmacotherapeutic regimens and quality of life were considered possibly not sensitive and possibly sensitive to pharmacist interventions , respectively .
Total cholesterol is sensitive to pharmacist interventions , while LDL-C and triglyceride levels are possibly sensitive to those interventions .
BACKGROUND Hyperlipidemia increases the risk of cardiovascular diseases , and control is pivotal for preventing disease complications .
Multidisciplinary interventions , including those performed by pharmacists , are important for improving patients ' outcomes .
OBJECTIVE To quantify the impact of pharmacist interventions in enhancing patients ' outcomes .