Strict control [ systolic BP ( SBP ) < 140 mmHg ] was not consistently better than mild control ( SBP < 150 mmHg ) for adults aged ≥65 years .
Mild SBP control benefitted subjects in all age ranges over 65 years .
Conclusions In this review , older adults with hypertension had decreased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality  with antihypertensives compared with no treatment .
Strict control was not consistently better than mild control in older adults .
The current evidence is insufficient to determine the safest , most beneficial hypertension regimen in older adults
Background Hypertension increases with increasing age .
Optimal treatment of hypertension is important to reduce cardiovascular disease .
Recent guidelines for hypertension have made recommendations for older adults but are supported by evidence that includes younger individuals .
This systematic review evaluates the benefits and harms of antihypertensive agents in adults aged ≥65 years .
Principal Results of the Japanese Trial to Assess Optimal Systolic Blood Pressure in Elderly Hypertensive Patients (JATOS)
The benefits of lowering a systolic blood pressure below 140 mmHg in elderly hypertension remain controversial . This study is a prospect i ve , r and omized , open-label study with blinded assessment of endpoints to compare the 2-year effect of strict treatment to maintain systolic blood pressure below 140 mmHg with that of mild treatment to maintain systolic blood pressure below 160 but at or above 140 mmHg in elderly hypertensive patients . Patients with essential hypertension ( 65–85 years old , with a pretreatment systolic blood pressure of above 160 mmHg ) were r and omly assigned to receive strict treatment ( n=2,212 ) or mild treatment ( n=2,206 ) . The baseline drug was efonidipine hydrochloride , a long-acting calcium antagonist . The primary endpoint was the combined incidence of cardiovascular disease and renal failure , and the secondary endpoints were total deaths and any safety problems . Although final blood pressures ( systolic/diastolic ) were significantly lower in the strict-treatment group compared with the mild-treatment group ( 135.9/74.8 vs. 145.6/78.1 mmHg ; p<0.001 ) , the incidence of the primary endpoint was similar in the two groups ( 86 patients in each group ; p=0.99 ) . Total deaths were 54 in the strict-treatment group vs. 42 in the mild-treatment group ( p=0.22 ) , and treatment was withdrawn because of adverse events in 36 patients in each group ( p=0.99 ) . An interaction between age and treatment for the primary endpoints ( p=0.03 ) was seen . Complex clinical features associated with aging seem to have obscured the difference in effect between the two treatments . Further studies are needed to assess the optimal treatment strategy for hypertension in the elderly
Strict control [ systolic BP ( SBP ) < 140 mmHg ] was not consistently better than mild control ( SBP < 150 mmHg ) for adults aged ≥65 years .
Mild SBP control benefitted subjects in all age ranges over 65 years .
Conclusions In this review , older adults with hypertension had decreased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality  with antihypertensives compared with no treatment .
Strict control was not consistently better than mild control in older adults .
The current evidence is insufficient to determine the safest , most beneficial hypertension regimen in older adults
Background Hypertension increases with increasing age .
Optimal treatment of hypertension is important to reduce cardiovascular disease .
Recent guidelines for hypertension have made recommendations for older adults but are supported by evidence that includes younger individuals .
This systematic review evaluates the benefits and harms of antihypertensive agents in adults aged ≥65 years .