The articles were grouped into four main categories : decision aids and outcome predictors , electrical cardioversion-based protocol s , antiarrhythmic-based protocol s , and general management protocol s. Conclusion This systematic review is the first study to our knowledge to evaluate the optimal management of symptomatic AF/AFLin  the ED with a direct impact on ED disposition .
There are several viable management strategies that can result in safe discharge from the ED in the right patient population , and decision aids can be utilized to guide selection of appropriate patients for discharge
Introduction Management of  atrial fibrillation ( AF ) and atrial flutter ( AFL )  in the emergency department ( ED ) varies greatly , and there are currently no United States guidelines to guide management with regard to patient disposition after ED treatment .
The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the literature for decision aids to guide disposition of patients with AF/AFLin the ED , and assess potential outcomes associated with different management strategies in the ED .
A prospective, randomized, controlled trial of an emergency department-based atrial fibrillation treatment strategy with low-molecular-weight heparin.
STUDY OBJECTIVE We assess an alternative accelerated clinical pathway approach to the management of patients with newly diagnosed or new-onset atrial fibrillation ( AF ) . METHODS A prospect i ve , r and omized pilot study of 2  AF disease-management strategies was conducted at a single university hospital . A traditional approach of hospital admission versus an accelerated emergency department-based strategy with low-molecular-weight heparin and early cardioversion to sinus rhythm was assessed in a cohort of patients with uncomplicated AF . The primary end points were length of stay and total actual direct costs . RESULTS Eighteen patients were r and omized over a 15-month period . The accelerated treatment strategy in the ED result ed in a substantial decrease in length of stay ( 2.1+/-2.3 versus < 1 day ) and a favorable trend toward mean cost reduction ( $ 1,706+/-$1,512 versus $ 879+/-$394 ; P = .15 ) . The clinical outcomes ( rate of sinus rhythm at discharge and follow-up and complications caused by AF ) related to AF were similar in the 2 groups . CONCLUSION A disease-management strategy for new , uncomplicated AF that uses an ED-outpatient treatment pathway results in a shorter length of stay at potentially lower cost . The results of this pilot study warrant further investigation
The articles were grouped into four main categories : decision aids and outcome predictors , electrical cardioversion-based protocol s , antiarrhythmic-based protocol s , and general management protocol s. Conclusion This systematic review is the first study to our knowledge to evaluate the optimal management of symptomatic AF/AFLin  the ED with a direct impact on ED disposition .
There are several viable management strategies that can result in safe discharge from the ED in the right patient population , and decision aids can be utilized to guide selection of appropriate patients for discharge
Introduction Management of  atrial fibrillation ( AF ) and atrial flutter ( AFL )  in the emergency department ( ED ) varies greatly , and there are currently no United States guidelines to guide management with regard to patient disposition after ED treatment .
The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the literature for decision aids to guide disposition of patients with AF/AFLin the ED , and assess potential outcomes associated with different management strategies in the ED .