The sensitivity and specificity of commonly implemented sideline assessment tools are generally good to very good , especially for symptom scores and cognitive evaluations performed within 48 hours of injury , and they are improved when a baseline evaluation is available for comparison .
CONTEXT The sideline assessment of concussion is challenging , given its variable presentations , the limited sensitivity and specificity of sideline assessment tools , and how the presentation of the injury evolves over time .
In addition , the diagnostic process , as well as the tools used to assess and manage concussion , continue to progress as research and what we know about concussion advance .
This paper focuses on the initial assessment on the sideline by review ing the concussion-evaluation literature , drawing from clinical experience to emphasize a st and ardized approach , and underscoring the importance of both familiarity with the athlete and clinical judgment .
OBJECTIVE To review the evidence regarding the clinical assessment of sport-related concussion on the sideline .
Additional considerations included making same-day return-to-play decisions , the sensitivity and specificity of sideline testing , and the importance of ongoing assessment and follow-up of injured athletes .
CONCLUSIONS The sideline assessment of sport-related concussion is challenging given the elusiveness and variability of presentation , reliance on athlete-reported symptoms , and the varying specificity and sensitivity values of sideline assessment tools .
In addition , the recognition of injury and assessment often occur in a time-pressured environment , requiring rapid disposition and decision making .
Cumulative effects associated with recurrent concussion in collegiate football players: the NCAA Concussion Study.
CONTEXT Approximately 300 000 sport-related concussions occur annually in the United States , and the likelihood of serious sequelae may increase with repeated head injury . OBJECTIVE To estimate the incidence of concussion and time to recovery after concussion in collegiate football players . DESIGN , SETTING , AND PARTICIPANTS Prospect i ve cohort study of 2905 football players from 25 US colleges were tested at preseason baseline in 1999 , 2000 , and 2001 on a variety of measures and followed up prospect ively to ascertain concussion occurrence . Players injured with a concussion were monitored until their concussion symptoms resolved and were followed up for repeat concussions until completion of their collegiate football career or until the end of the 2001 football season . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Incidence of concussion and repeat concussion ; type and duration of symptoms and course of recovery among players who were injured with a concussion during the seasons . RESULTS During follow-up of 4251 player-seasons , 184 players ( 6.3 % ) had a concussion , and 12 ( 6.5 % ) of these players had a repeat concussion within the same season . There was an association between reported number of previous concussions and likelihood of incident concussion .  Players reporting a history of 3 or more previous concussions were 3.0 ( 95 % confidence interval , 1.6 - 5.6 ) times more likely to have an incident concussion than players with no concussion history . Headache was the most commonly reported symptom at the time of injury ( 85.2 % ) , and mean overall symptom duration was 82 hours . Slowed recovery was associated with a history of multiple previous concussions ( 30.0 % of those with > or =3 previous concussions had symptoms lasting > 1 week compared with 14.6 % of those with 1 previous concussion ) . Of the 12 incident within-season repeat concussions , 11 ( 91.7 % ) occurred within 10 days of the first injury , and 9 ( 75.0 % ) occurred within 7 days of the first injury . CONCLUSIONS Our study suggests that players with a history of previous concussions are more likely to have future concussive injuries than those with no history ; 1 in 15 players with a concussion may have additional concussions in the same playing season ; and previous concussions may be associated with slower recovery of neurological function
The sensitivity and specificity of commonly implemented sideline assessment tools are generally good to very good , especially for symptom scores and cognitive evaluations performed within 48 hours of injury , and they are improved when a baseline evaluation is available for comparison .
CONTEXT The sideline assessment of concussion is challenging , given its variable presentations , the limited sensitivity and specificity of sideline assessment tools , and how the presentation of the injury evolves over time .
In addition , the diagnostic process , as well as the tools used to assess and manage concussion , continue to progress as research and what we know about concussion advance .
This paper focuses on the initial assessment on the sideline by review ing the concussion-evaluation literature , drawing from clinical experience to emphasize a st and ardized approach , and underscoring the importance of both familiarity with the athlete and clinical judgment .
OBJECTIVE To review the evidence regarding the clinical assessment of sport-related concussion on the sideline .
Additional considerations included making same-day return-to-play decisions , the sensitivity and specificity of sideline testing , and the importance of ongoing assessment and follow-up of injured athletes .
CONCLUSIONS The sideline assessment of sport-related concussion is challenging given the elusiveness and variability of presentation , reliance on athlete-reported symptoms , and the varying specificity and sensitivity values of sideline assessment tools .
In addition , the recognition of injury and assessment often occur in a time-pressured environment , requiring rapid disposition and decision making .