D. Restoration of sinus rhythm for monophasic vs. biphasic waveforms .
Another study showed that PVI result ed in long-term restoration
Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is a major public health problem in the United States .
More than 2.3 million Americans are estimated to have AF ( 1 ) .
The known association between AF and substantial mortality , morbidity , and health care costs compounds the effect of this condition .
Not only is the risk for death in patients with AF twice that of patients without it , but AF can result in myocardial ischemia and infa rct ion , exacerbate heart failure ( HF ) , and cause tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy if the ventricular rate is not well-controlled ( 25 ) .
The most dreaded complication of AF is thromboembolism , especially stroke ( 6 ) .
In some patients , AF or therapies to manage this condition can severely depreciate quality of life ( 710 ) .
Furthermore , the management of AF and its complications is responsible for nearly $ 16 billion in additional costs to the U.S. health care system per year ( 11 ) .
We conducted this systematic review to evaluate the comparative safety and effectiveness of rate- versus rhythm-control strategies ;  medications used for ventricular rate control ; strict versus more lenient rate-control strategies ; nonpharmacologic rate-control therapies  versus medications ; electrical cardioversion and antiarrhythmic medications  for restoration of sinus rhythm ;  and  catheter ablation , surgical ablation , and antiarrhythmic medications  for maintenance of sinus rhythm .
Rate control vs rhythm control in patients with nonvalvular persistent atrial fibrillation: the results of the Polish How to Treat Chronic Atrial Fibrillation (HOT CAFE) Study.
STUDY OBJECTIVES The relative risks and benefits of strategies of rate control vs rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation ( AF ) remain to be fully explored . DESIGN The How to Treat Chronic Atrial Fibrillation ( HOT CAFE ) Polish trial was design ed to evaluate in a r and omized , multicenter , and prospect i ve manner the feasibility and long-term outcomes of rate control vs rhythm control strategies in patients with persistent AF . PATIENTS Our study population comprised 205 patients ( 134 men and 71 women ; mean [ + /- SD ] age , 60.8 + /- 11.2 years ) with a mean AF duration of 273.7 + /- 112.4 days . The mean observation period was 1.7 + /- 0.4 years . One hundred one patients were r and omly assigned to the rate control group and received rate-slowing therapy guided by repeated 24-h Holter monitoring . Direct current cardioversion and atrioventricular junctional ablation with pacemaker placement were alternative nonpharmacologic strategies for patients with tachycardia that was resistant to medical therapy . One hundred four patients were r and omized to sinus rhythm restoration and maintenance using serial cardioversion supported by a predefined stepwise antiarrhythmic drug regimen ( ie , disopyramide , propafenone , sotalol , and amiodarone ) . In both groups , thromboembolic prophylaxis followed current guidelines . MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS At the end of follow-up , 63.5 % of patients in the rhythm control arm remained in sinus rhythm . No significant differences in the composite end point ( ie , all-cause mortality , number of thromboembolic events , or major bleeding ) were found between the rate control group and the rhythm control group ( odds ratio , 1.98 ; 95 % confidence interval , 0.28 to 22.3 ; p > 0.71 ) . The incidence of hospital admissions was much lower in the rate control arm ( 12 % vs 74 % , respectively ; p < 0.001 ) . New York Heart Association functional class improved in both study groups , while mean exercise tolerance , as measured by the maximal treadmill workload , improved only in the rhythm control group ( 5.2 + /- 5.1 vs 7.6 + /- 3.3 metabolic equivalents , respectively ; p < 0.001 ) . The rhythm control strategy led to an increased mean left ventricular fractional shortening ( 29 + /- 7 % vs 31 + /- 7 % , respectively ; p < 0.01 ) . One episode of pulmonary embolism occurred in the rate control group despite oral anticoagulation therapy , while three patients in the rhythm control arm of the study experienced ischemic strokes ( not significant ) . CONCLUSIONS The Polish HOT CAFE study revealed no significant differences in major end points between the rate control group and the rhythm control group
D. Restoration of sinus rhythm for monophasic vs. biphasic waveforms .
Another study showed that PVI result ed in long-term restoration
Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is a major public health problem in the United States .
More than 2.3 million Americans are estimated to have AF ( 1 ) .
The known association between AF and substantial mortality , morbidity , and health care costs compounds the effect of this condition .
Not only is the risk for death in patients with AF twice that of patients without it , but AF can result in myocardial ischemia and infa rct ion , exacerbate heart failure ( HF ) , and cause tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy if the ventricular rate is not well-controlled ( 25 ) .
The most dreaded complication of AF is thromboembolism , especially stroke ( 6 ) .
In some patients , AF or therapies to manage this condition can severely depreciate quality of life ( 710 ) .
Furthermore , the management of AF and its complications is responsible for nearly $ 16 billion in additional costs to the U.S. health care system per year ( 11 ) .
We conducted this systematic review to evaluate the comparative safety and effectiveness of rate- versus rhythm-control strategies ;  medications used for ventricular rate control ; strict versus more lenient rate-control strategies ; nonpharmacologic rate-control therapies  versus medications ; electrical cardioversion and antiarrhythmic medications  for restoration of sinus rhythm ;  and  catheter ablation , surgical ablation , and antiarrhythmic medications  for maintenance of sinus rhythm .