Women taking HT had a significantly decreased incidence of fracture with long-term use .
Research ers found no strong evidence that HT has a clinical ly meaningful impact on the incidence of colorectal cancer .
AUTHORS ' CONCLUSIONS : Women with intolerable menopausal symptoms may wish to weigh the benefits of symptom relief against the small absolute risk of harm arising from short-term use of low-dose HT , provided they do not have specific contraindications .
HT may be unsuitable for some women , including those at increased risk of cardiovascular disease , increased risk of thromboembolic disease ( such as those with obesity or a history of venous thrombosis ) or increased risk of some types of cancer ( such as breast cancer , in women with a uterus ) .
The risk of endometrial cancer among women with a uterus taking oestrogen-only HT is well documented .
HT is not indicated for primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease or dementia , nor for prevention of deterioration of cognitive function in postmenopausal women .
Although HT is considered effective for the prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis , it is generally recommended as an option only for women at significant risk for whom non-oestrogen therapies are unsuitable .
BACKGROUND : Hormone therapy ( HT ) is widely provided for control of menopausal symptoms and has been used for the management and prevention of cardiovascular disease , osteoporosis and  dementia in older women .
This is an up date d version of a Cochrane review first published in 2005 .
OBJECTIVES : To assess effects of long-term HT ( at least 1 year 's duration ) on mortality , cardiovascular outcomes , cancer , gallbladder disease , fracture and cognition in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women during and after cessation of treatment .
Esterified estrogen therapy in postmenopausal women. Relationships of bone marker changes and plasma estradiol to BMD changes: A two-year study
Objective To determine the relationships among bone mineral density changes , bone marker changes , and plasma estrogens in postmenopausal women receiving estrogen replacement therapy .  Design A total of 406 postmenopausal women received 1,000 mg calcium and continuous esterified estrogens ( 0.3 mg , 0.625 mg , or 1.25 mg ) or placebo daily for up to 24 months . Bone mineral density and bone marker measurements were determined at 6-month intervals ; plasma estrogens were measured in a subset after 12 , 18 , and 24 months . Results Esterified estrogens produced significant increases in bone mineral density ( lumbar spine , hip ) compared with baseline and placebo at 6 , 12 , 18 , and 24 months . Bone markers decreased from baseline with all esterified estrogen doses relative to placebo . Bone marker changes at 6 months correlated negatively with bone mineral density changes at 24 months ( correlation coefficient range = −0.122 to −0.439 ) . The strongest correlation was noted for spine bone mineral density changes and serum osteocalcin . Mean plasma estrogen levels increased with esterified estrogen dose , and bone mineral density changes correlated positively with plasma estrogen levels . Positive bone mineral density changes were noted in treatment groups with plasma estradiol levels at and above 25 pg/mL. Conclusions Esterified estrogens , at doses from 0.3 mg to 1.25 mg/day , unopposed by progestin , increase bone mineral density of the spine and hip in postmenopausal women .  These bone mineral density changes correlated significantly with bone marker changes at 6 months and with plasma estrogens at 12 , 18 , or 24 months . Data variability minimizes the predictive value of the bone marker changes in monitoring individual therapy
Women taking HT had a significantly decreased incidence of fracture with long-term use .
Research ers found no strong evidence that HT has a clinical ly meaningful impact on the incidence of colorectal cancer .
AUTHORS ' CONCLUSIONS : Women with intolerable menopausal symptoms may wish to weigh the benefits of symptom relief against the small absolute risk of harm arising from short-term use of low-dose HT , provided they do not have specific contraindications .
HT may be unsuitable for some women , including those at increased risk of cardiovascular disease , increased risk of thromboembolic disease ( such as those with obesity or a history of venous thrombosis ) or increased risk of some types of cancer ( such as breast cancer , in women with a uterus ) .
The risk of endometrial cancer among women with a uterus taking oestrogen-only HT is well documented .
HT is not indicated for primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease or dementia , nor for prevention of deterioration of cognitive function in postmenopausal women .
Although HT is considered effective for the prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis , it is generally recommended as an option only for women at significant risk for whom non-oestrogen therapies are unsuitable .
BACKGROUND : Hormone therapy ( HT ) is widely provided for control of menopausal symptoms and has been used for the management and prevention of cardiovascular disease , osteoporosis and  dementia in older women .
This is an up date d version of a Cochrane review first published in 2005 .
OBJECTIVES : To assess effects of long-term HT ( at least 1 year 's duration ) on mortality , cardiovascular outcomes , cancer , gallbladder disease , fracture and cognition in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women during and after cessation of treatment .