Educational interventions did not seem to have a positive impact on HbA1c , systolic blood pressure or lipid profiles .
The use of telemedicine , clinician reminders and feedback showed mixed results but there was a level of consistency in improvement in HbA1c when multifaceted interventions on multidisciplinary teams were implemented .
Targeting general or family physicians was largely ineffective in improving the cardiovascular risk factors considered , except when using a computer application on insulin h and ling of type 2 diabetes or customised simulated cases with feedbacks .
Similarly , interventions targeting nurses did not improve outcomes compared to st and ard care .
Multifaceted professional interventions were more effective than single interventions targeting single primary or community care professionals in improving glycaemic control
OBJECTIVE To review the interventions targeting primary care or community based professionals on glycaemic and cardiovascular risk factor control in people with diabetes .
Improving Diabetes Care in Practice
OBJECTIVE —The purpose of this study was to determine whether implementation of a multicomponent organizational intervention can produce significant change in diabetes care and outcomes in community primary care practice s. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS —This was a group-r and omized , controlled clinical trial evaluating the practical effectiveness of a multicomponent intervention ( TRANSLATE )  in 24 practice s. The intervention included implementation of an electronic diabetes registry , visit reminders , and patient-specific physician alerts . A site coordinator facilitated previsit planning and a monthly review of performance with a local physician champion . The principle outcomes were the percentage of patients achieving target values for the composite of systolic blood pressure ( SBP ) < 130 mmHg , LDL cholesterol < 100 mg/dl , and A1C < 7.0 % at baseline and 12 months . Six process measures were also followed . RESULTS —Over 24 months , 69,965 visits from 8,405 adult patients with type 2 diabetes were recorded from 238 health care providers in 24 practice s from 17 health systems .  Diabetes process measures increased significantly more in intervention than in control practice s , giving net increases as follows : foot examinations 35.0 % ( P < 0.0.001 ) ; annual eye examinations 25.9 % ( P < 0.001 ) ; renal testing 28.5 % ( P < 0.001 ) ; A1C testing 8.1%(P < 0.001 ) ; blood pressure monitoring 3.5 % ( P = 0.05 ) ; and LDL testing 8.6 % ( P < 0.001 ) . Mean A1C adjusted for age , sex , and comorbidity decreased significantly in intervention practice s ( P < 0.02 ) . At 12 months , intervention practice s had significantly greater improvement in achieving recommended clinical values for SBP , A1C , and LDL than control clinics ( P = 0.002 ) . CONCLUSIONS — Introduction of a multicomponent organizational intervention in the primary care setting significantly increases the percentage of type 2 diabetic patients achieving recommended clinical outcomes
Educational interventions did not seem to have a positive impact on HbA1c , systolic blood pressure or lipid profiles .
The use of telemedicine , clinician reminders and feedback showed mixed results but there was a level of consistency in improvement in HbA1c when multifaceted interventions on multidisciplinary teams were implemented .
Targeting general or family physicians was largely ineffective in improving the cardiovascular risk factors considered , except when using a computer application on insulin h and ling of type 2 diabetes or customised simulated cases with feedbacks .
Similarly , interventions targeting nurses did not improve outcomes compared to st and ard care .
Multifaceted professional interventions were more effective than single interventions targeting single primary or community care professionals in improving glycaemic control
OBJECTIVE To review the interventions targeting primary care or community based professionals on glycaemic and cardiovascular risk factor control in people with diabetes .