Operative time and blood loss were significantly reduced in the mini-incision group for studies with the posterior or posterolateral approach .
Concerning postoperative complications , there were no significant differences between the two groups with no significant heterogeneity .
No differences were observed between the two groups for Harris hip score and radiographic results except for cup anterversion .
Although mini-incision appeared to have similar outcomes compared to st and ard incision , the follow-up is short-term according to current st and ards in THA .
Le temps opératoire et les pertes sanguines étaient significativement moins importants dans le groupe mini-incision réalisé par voie postérieure ou postéro-latérale .
Il n'y a pas de différence significative dans les complications postopératoires entre les deux groupes de même en ce qui concerne le score de Harris , les résultats radiologiques exceptés pour l'antéversion de la cupule .
The purpose of this study was to compare the operative outcome between mini and st and ard incisions in total hip arthroplasty ( THA ) .
High- quality studies are required to compare the outcomes of these two procedures .ResuméLe but de cette étude est de comparer le devenir opératoire des patients ayant bénéficié d'une prothèse totale de hanche par voie  mini-invasive ou par incision st and ard .
Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles.
CONTEXT Selective reporting of outcomes within published studies based on the nature or direction of their results has been widely suspected , but direct evidence of such bias is currently limited to case reports . OBJECTIVE To study empirically the extent and nature of outcome reporting bias in a cohort of r and omized trials . DESIGN Cohort study using protocol s and published reports of r and omized trials approved by the Scientific-Ethical Committees for Copenhagen and Frederiksberg , Denmark , in 1994 - 1995 . The number and characteristics of reported and unreported trial outcomes were recorded from protocol s , journal articles , and a survey of trialists . An outcome was considered incompletely reported if insufficient data were presented in the published articles for meta- analysis . Odds ratios relating the completeness of outcome reporting to statistical significance were calculated for each trial and then pooled to provide an overall estimate of bias . Protocol s and published articles were also compared to identify discrepancies in primary outcomes . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Completeness of reporting of efficacy and harm outcomes and of statistically significant vs nonsignificant outcomes ; consistency between primary outcomes defined in the most recent protocol s and those defined in published articles . RESULTS One hundred two trials with 122 published journal articles and 3736 outcomes were identified . Overall , 50 % of efficacy and 65 % of harm outcomes per trial were incompletely reported . Statistically significant outcomes had a higher odds of being fully reported compared with nonsignificant outcomes for both efficacy ( pooled odds ratio , 2.4 ; 95 % confidence interval [ CI ] , 1.4 - 4.0 ) and harm ( pooled odds ratio , 4.7 ; 95 % CI , 1.8 - 12.0 ) data . In comparing published articles with protocol s , 62 % of trials had at least 1 primary outcome that was changed , introduced , or omitted . Eighty-six percent of survey responders ( 42/49 ) denied the existence of unreported outcomes despite clear evidence to the contrary . CONCLUSIONS The reporting of trial outcomes is not only frequently incomplete but also biased and inconsistent with protocol s. Published articles , as well as review s that incorporate them , may therefore be unreliable and overestimate the benefits of an intervention . To ensure transparency , planned trials should be registered and protocol s should be made publicly available prior to trial completion
Operative time and blood loss were significantly reduced in the mini-incision group for studies with the posterior or posterolateral approach .
Concerning postoperative complications , there were no significant differences between the two groups with no significant heterogeneity .
No differences were observed between the two groups for Harris hip score and radiographic results except for cup anterversion .
Although mini-incision appeared to have similar outcomes compared to st and ard incision , the follow-up is short-term according to current st and ards in THA .
Le temps opératoire et les pertes sanguines étaient significativement moins importants dans le groupe mini-incision réalisé par voie postérieure ou postéro-latérale .
Il n'y a pas de différence significative dans les complications postopératoires entre les deux groupes de même en ce qui concerne le score de Harris , les résultats radiologiques exceptés pour l'antéversion de la cupule .
The purpose of this study was to compare the operative outcome between mini and st and ard incisions in total hip arthroplasty ( THA ) .
High- quality studies are required to compare the outcomes of these two procedures .ResuméLe but de cette étude est de comparer le devenir opératoire des patients ayant bénéficié d'une prothèse totale de hanche par voie  mini-invasive ou par incision st and ard .