Treating patients to lower than st and ard BP targets , < /=140 - 160/90 - 100 mmHg , does not reduce mortality or morbidity .
BACKGROUND When treating elevated blood pressure , doctors need to know what blood pressure ( BP ) target they should try to achieve .
The st and ard of clinical practice for some time has been < /= 140 - 160/ 90 - 100 mmHg .
New guidelines are recommending BP targets lower than this st and ard .
It is not known whether attempting to achieve targets lower than the st and ard reduces mortality and morbidity .
OBJECTIVES To determine if lower BP targets ( < /= 135/85 mmHg ) are associated with reduction in mortality and morbidity as compared with st and ard BP targets ( < /= 140 - 160/ 90 - 100 mmHg ) .
Effects of individual risk factors on the incidence of cardiovascular events in the treated hypertensive patients of the Hypertension Optimal Treatment Study. HOT Study Group.
BACKGROUND The Hypertension Optimal Treatment ( HOT ) Study has provided information about cardiovascular events in 18790 hypertensives , subjected to pronounced blood pressure ( BP ) lowering for a mean of 3.8 years . The HOT study data have subsequently been analysed after stratification of the patients according to global cardiovascular risk , and it has been found that , despite intensive blood pressure lowering in all risk strata , morbid event rates increased with increasing risk stratum . OBJECTIVES Previously analysed global risk strata were based on combinations of risk factors . The analyses presented here were intended to provide information on the relative role that the presence of each individual factor may have in increasing cardiovascular risk , despite good BP control . METHODS Risk ratios ( RR ) for patients with and those without a risk factor were calculated with 95 % confidence intervals ( CI ) using a Cox proportional hazard model , and adjusted for all variables except the one under examination . RESULTS For all risk factors considered and for all types of event , RR were always greater than 1 , indicating a greater risk in the presence , compared with that in the absence of each factor . The male gender was a statistically significant risk for cardiovascular ( CV ) events , CV and total mortality and particularly for myocardial infa rct ion ( MI ) ; age > or = 65 years for CV events , stroke , CV and particularly total mortality ; smoking for all events analysed , but particularly for total mortality ( twice higher in smokers than in non-smokers ) ; high serum cholesterol ( > 6.8 mmol/l ) for CV events , MI and CV mortality ; high serum creatinine ( > 155 micromol/l ) for CV events , stroke , CV and total mortality ; diabetes for CV events , stroke , total mortality and particularly CV mortality ; and ischaemic heart disease for all events analysed . Adjusted RR were often close to or greater than 2 . CONCLUSIONS Each of the risk factors considered was found to be an important cause of residual risk , despite good BP control . These findings emphasize the importance of addressing other correctable risk factors , e.g. smoking , hypercholesterolaemia and diabetes , as well as rigorous control of blood pressure , and of initiating antihypertensive therapy before cardiovascular and renal damage becomes manifest
Treating patients to lower than st and ard BP targets , < /=140 - 160/90 - 100 mmHg , does not reduce mortality or morbidity .
BACKGROUND When treating elevated blood pressure , doctors need to know what blood pressure ( BP ) target they should try to achieve .
The st and ard of clinical practice for some time has been < /= 140 - 160/ 90 - 100 mmHg .
New guidelines are recommending BP targets lower than this st and ard .
It is not known whether attempting to achieve targets lower than the st and ard reduces mortality and morbidity .
OBJECTIVES To determine if lower BP targets ( < /= 135/85 mmHg ) are associated with reduction in mortality and morbidity as compared with st and ard BP targets ( < /= 140 - 160/ 90 - 100 mmHg ) .