Interventions such as supervised or individualised exercise therapy and self-management techniques may enhance exercise adherence .
BACKGROUND Chronic musculoskeletal pain ( CMP ) is a major health problem , accounting for approximately one-quarter of general practice ( GP ) consultations in the United Kingdom ( UK ) .
Exercise and physical activity is beneficial for the most common types of CMP , such as back and knee pain .
However , poor adherence to exercise and physical activity may limit long-term effectiveness .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to improve adherence to exercise and physical activity for people with chronic musculoskeletal pain .
Comparing Yoga, Exercise, and a Self-Care Book for Chronic Low Back Pain
Context Yoga combines exercise with achieving a state of mental focus through breathing . In the United States , 1 million people practice yoga for low back pain . Contribution The authors recruited patients who had a recent primary care visit for low back pain and r and omly assigned 101 to yoga or conventional exercise or a self-care book . Patients in the yoga and exercise groups reported good adherence at 26 weeks . Compared with self-care , symptoms were milder and function was better with yoga . The exercise group had intermediate outcomes . Symptoms improved between 12 and 26 weeks only with yoga . Implication s Yoga was a more effective treatment for low back pain than a self-care book . The Editors Most treatments for chronic low back pain have modest efficacy at best ( 1 ) . Exercise is one of the few proven treatments for chronic low back pain ; however , its effects are often small , and no form has been shown to be clearly better than another ( 2 - 5 ) . Yoga , which often couples physical exercise with breathing , is a popular alternative form of mindbody therapy . An estimated 14 million Americans practice d yoga in 2002 ( 6 ) , including more than 1 million who used it as a treatment for back pain ( 7 , 8) . Yoga may benefit patients with back pain simply because it involves exercise or because of its effects on mental focus . We found no published studies in western biomedical literature that evaluated yoga for chronic low back pain ; therefore , we design ed a clinical trial to evaluate its effectiveness and safety for this condition . Methods Study Design and Setting This r and omized , controlled trial compared the effects of yoga classes with conventional exercise classes and with a self-care book in patients with low back pain  that persisted for at least 12 weeks . The study was conducted at Group Health Cooperative , a nonprofit , integrated health care system with approximately 500000 enrollees in Washington State and Idaho . The Group Health Cooperative institutional review board approved the study protocol , and all study participants gave oral informed consent before the eligibility screening and written consent before the baseline interview and r and omization . Patients Patients from Group Health Cooperative were recruited for 12-week sessions of classes that were conducted between June and December 2003 . We mailed letters describing the study to 6913 patients between 20 and 64 years of age who had visited a primary care provider for treatment of back pain 3 to 15 months before the study ( according to electronic visit records ) . We also advertised the study in the health plan 's consumer magazine . Patients were informed that we were comparing 3 approaches for the relief of back pain and that each was design ed to help reduce the negative effects of low back pain on people 's lives . A research assistant telephoned patients who returned statements of interest to assess their eligibility . After we received their signed informed consent forms , eligible patients were telephoned again for collection of baseline data and r and omization to treatment . We excluded individuals whose back pain was complicated ( for example , sciatica , previous back surgery , or diagnosed spinal stenosis ) , potentially attributable to specific underlying diseases or conditions ( for example , pregnancy , metastatic cancer , spondylolisthesis , fractured bones , or dislocated joints ) , or minimal ( rating of less than 3 on a bothersomeness scale of 0 to 10 ) . We also excluded individuals who were currently receiving other back pain treatments or had participated in yoga or exercise training for back pain in the past year , those with a possible disincentive to improve ( such as patients receiving workers ' compensation or those involved in litigation ) , and those with unstable medical or severe psychiatric conditions or dementia . Patients who had contraindications ( for example , symptoms consistent with severe disk disease ) or schedules that precluded class participation , those who were unwilling to practice at home , or those who could not speak or underst and English were also excluded . R and omization Protocol Participants were r and omly assigned to participate in yoga or exercise classes or to receive the self-care book . We r and omly generated treatment assignments for each class series by using a computer program with block sizes of 6 or 9 . A research er who was not involved in patient recruitment or r and omization placed the assignments in opaque , sequentially numbered envelopes , which were stored in a locked filing cabinet until needed for r and omization . Interventions The yoga and exercise classes developed specifically for this study consisted of 12 weekly 75-minute classes design ed to benefit people with chronic low back pain . In addition to attending classes held at Group Health facilities , participants were asked to practice daily at home . Participants received h and outs that described home practice s , and yoga participants received auditory compact discs to guide them through the sequence of postures with the appropriate mental focus ( examples of postures are shown in the Appendix Figure ) . Study participants retained access to all medical care provided by their insurance plan . Appendix Figure . Yoga postures Yoga We chose to use viniyoga , a therapeutically oriented style of yoga that emphasizes safety and is relatively easy to learn . Our class instructor and a senior teacher of viniyoga , who has + written a book about its therapeutic uses ( 9 ) , design ed the yoga intervention for patients with back pain who did not have previous yoga experience . Although all the sessions emphasized use of postures and breathing for managing low back symptoms , each had a specific focus : relaxation ; strength-building , flexibility , and large-muscle movement ; asymmetric poses ; strengthening the hip muscles ; lateral bending ; integration ; and customizing a personal practice . The postures were selected from a core of 17 relatively simple postures , some with adaptations ( Appendix Table ) , and the sequence of the postures in each class was performed according to the rudiments of viniyoga ( 9 ) . Each class included a question - and -answer period , an initial and final breathing exercise , 5 to 12 postures , and a guided deep relaxation . Most postures were not held but were repeated 3 or 6 times . Exercise Because we could not identify a clearly superior form of therapeutic exercise for low back pain from the literature , a physical therapist design ed a 12-session class series that was 1 ) different from what most participants would have probably experienced in previous physical therapy sessions ( to maximize adherence ) and 2 ) similar to the yoga classes in number and length . We included a short educational talk that provided information on proper body mechanics , the benefits of exercise and realistic goal setting , and overcoming common barriers to developing an exercise routine ( for example , fear ) . Each session began with the educational talk ; feedback from the previous week ; simple warm-ups to increase heart rate ; and repetitions of a series of 7 aerobic exercises and 10 strengthening exercises that emphasized leg , hip , abdominal , and back muscles . Over the course of the 12-week series , the number of repetitions of each aerobic and strength exercise increased from 8 to 30 in increments of 2 . The strengthening exercises were followed by 12 stretches for the same muscle groups ; each stretch was held for 30 seconds . Classes ended with a short , unguided period of deep , slow breathing . Self-Care Book Participants were mailed a copy of The Back Pain Helpbook ( 10 ) , an evidence -based book that emphasized such self-care strategies as adoption of a comprehensive fitness and strength program , appropriate lifestyle modification , and guidelines for managing flare-ups . Although we did not provide any instructions for using the book , many of the chapters concluded with specific action items . Outcome Measures Interviewers who were masked to the treatment assignments conducted telephone interviews at baseline and at 6 , 12 , and 26 weeks after r and omization . The baseline interview collected information regarding sociodemographic characteristics , back pain history , and the participant 's level of knowledge about yoga and exercise . Participants were asked to describe their current pain and to rate their expectations for each intervention . The primary outcomes were back-related dysfunction and symptoms , and the primary time point of interest was 12 weeks . We used the modified Rol and Disability Scale ( 11 ) to measure patient dysfunction by totaling the number of positive responses to 23 questions about limitations of daily activities that might arise from back pain . This scale has been found to be valid , reliable , and sensitive to change ( 12 - 14 ) ; research ers estimate that the minimum clinical ly significant difference on the Rol and scale ranges from 2 to 3 points ( 13 , 15 ) . Participants rated how bothersome their back pain had been during the previous week on an 11-point scale , in which 0 represented not at all bothersome and 10 represented extremely bothersome ; a similar measure demonstrated substantial construct validity in earlier research ( 13 ) . Estimates of the minimum clinical ly significant difference on the bothersomeness scale were approximately 1.5 points ( 16 , 17 ) . Secondary outcome measures were general health status , which we assessed by conducting the Short Form-36 Health Survey ( 18 ) ; degree of restricted activity as determined by patient responses to 3 questions ( 19 ) ; and medication use . After all outcomes data were collected , we asked questions related to specific interventions ( for example , Did you practice at home ? ) . At the 12-week interview , we asked class participants about any pain or substantial discomfort they experienced as a result of the classes . We assessed adherence to the home practice recommendations by asking class participants to complete weekly home practice logs and by asking about home practice during the follow-up
Interventions such as supervised or individualised exercise therapy and self-management techniques may enhance exercise adherence .
BACKGROUND Chronic musculoskeletal pain ( CMP ) is a major health problem , accounting for approximately one-quarter of general practice ( GP ) consultations in the United Kingdom ( UK ) .
Exercise and physical activity is beneficial for the most common types of CMP , such as back and knee pain .
However , poor adherence to exercise and physical activity may limit long-term effectiveness .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to improve adherence to exercise and physical activity for people with chronic musculoskeletal pain .