Educational interventions did not seem to have a positive impact on HbA1c , systolic blood pressure or lipid profiles .
The use of telemedicine , clinician reminders and feedback showed mixed results but there was a level of consistency in improvement in HbA1c when multifaceted interventions on multidisciplinary teams were implemented .
Targeting general or family physicians was largely ineffective in improving the cardiovascular risk factors considered , except when using a computer application on insulin h and ling of type 2 diabetes or customised simulated cases with feedbacks .
Similarly , interventions targeting nurses did not improve outcomes compared to st and ard care .
Multifaceted professional interventions were more effective than single interventions targeting single primary or community care professionals in improving glycaemic control
OBJECTIVE To review the interventions targeting primary care or community based professionals on glycaemic and cardiovascular risk factor control in people with diabetes .
Can diabetes management be safely transferred to practice nurses in a primary care setting? A randomised controlled trial.
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES To determine whether the management of  type 2 diabetes mellitus  in a primary care setting can be safely transferred to practice nurses . BACKGROUND Because of the increasing prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus and the burden of caring for individual patients , the dem and type 2 diabetes mellitus patients place on primary health care re sources has become overwhelming . DESIGN R and omised controlled trial . METHODS The patients in the intervention group were cared for by practice nurses who treated glucose levels , blood pressure and lipid profile according to a specified protocol . The control group received conventional care from a general practitioner . The primary outcome measure was the mean decrease seen in glycated haemoglobin ( HbA1c ) levels at the end of the follow-up period ( 14 months ) . RESULTS A total of 230 patients was r and omised with 206 completing the study . The between-group differences with respect to reduction in HbA1c , blood pressure and lipid profile were not significant . Blood pressure decreased significantly in both groups ; 7.4/3.2 mm Hg in the intervention group and 5.6/1.0 mm Hg in the control group . In both groups , more patients met the target values goals for lipid profile compared to baseline . In the intervention group , there was some deterioration in the health-related quality of life and an increase in diabetes-related symptoms . Patients being treated by a practice nurse were more satisfied with their treatment than those being treated by a general practitioner . CONCLUSION Practice nurses achieved results , which were comparable to those achieved by a general practitioner with respect to clinical parameters with better patient satisfaction . RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE This study shows that diabetes management in primary care can be safely transferred to practice nurses
Educational interventions did not seem to have a positive impact on HbA1c , systolic blood pressure or lipid profiles .
The use of telemedicine , clinician reminders and feedback showed mixed results but there was a level of consistency in improvement in HbA1c when multifaceted interventions on multidisciplinary teams were implemented .
Targeting general or family physicians was largely ineffective in improving the cardiovascular risk factors considered , except when using a computer application on insulin h and ling of type 2 diabetes or customised simulated cases with feedbacks .
Similarly , interventions targeting nurses did not improve outcomes compared to st and ard care .
Multifaceted professional interventions were more effective than single interventions targeting single primary or community care professionals in improving glycaemic control
OBJECTIVE To review the interventions targeting primary care or community based professionals on glycaemic and cardiovascular risk factor control in people with diabetes .