Inconclusive results were reported about the cleaning and disinfection accomplished by the two irrigation methods .
There is insufficient evidence to cl aim general superiority of any one of these methods .
The aim of this study was to systematic ally review and critically analyse the published data on the treatment outcome ( primary outcome ) and on the  cleaning and disinfection of root canals  ( secondary outcomes ) achieved by negative pressure irrigation as compared to syringe irrigation .
Microbiological evaluation of different irrigation protocols on root canal disinfection in teeth with apical periodontitis: an in vivo study.
The present in vivo study was design ed to evaluate the efficacy of apical negative pressure irrigation ( ANP ) , passive ultrasonic irrigation ( PUI ) and positive pressure irrigation ( PP ) in the reduction of intracanal bacteria of dogs ' teeth with pulp necrosis and apical periodontitis . Eighty root canals were r and omly distributed into 3 experimental and 2 control groups according to the irrigation delivery system : group ANP ( n=20 ) , group PUI ( n=20 ) , group PP ( n=20 ) , group PC ( positive control - sterile saline irrigation ; n=10 ) and group NC ( negative control - vital pulps not subjected to bacterial inoculation ; n=10 ) . The first sample ( S1 ) was collected at baseline , and the second sample ( S2 ) was collected after the disinfection protocol s. All sample s were seeded in culture media for anaerobic bacteria . CFU counts were analyzed statistically by the Kruskal-Wallis , Dwass-Steel-Critchlow-Fligner post-hoc and Chi-square followed by Tukey like multiple comparisons for proportions ( α=0.05 ) . All experimental groups were effective in reducing Gram-positive bacteria compared with PC ( p<0.05 ) . Regarding the reduction of Gram-negative bacteria , group ANP was significantly better than PP ( p<0.05 ) . No statistically significant difference could be found between PP and PUI ( p>0.05 ) . In dog 's teeth with apical periodontitis , the use of ANP and PUI can be considered promising disinfection protocol s as both delivery systems promoted a significant bacterial reduction
Inconclusive results were reported about the cleaning and disinfection accomplished by the two irrigation methods .
There is insufficient evidence to cl aim general superiority of any one of these methods .
The aim of this study was to systematic ally review and critically analyse the published data on the treatment outcome ( primary outcome ) and on the  cleaning and disinfection of root canals  ( secondary outcomes ) achieved by negative pressure irrigation as compared to syringe irrigation .