The HBET group did not show improvement in MWD/T compared with the WA group ( SMD 0.30 , 95 % CI -0.45 to 1.05 ; P = 0.43 ; moderate- quality evidence ) .Compared with HBET , SET was more beneficial for PFWD/T but had no effect on quality of life parameters nor on self-reported functional impairment .
Compared with WA , SET was more beneficial for PFWD/T and self-reported functional impairment , as well as for some quality of life parameters ( e.g. , physical functioning , pain , and physical component summary after 12 months ) , and HBET had no effect .
Data show no obvious effects on mortality rates .
Evidence of moderate and high quality shows that SET provides an important benefit for treadmill-measured walking distance ( MWD and PFWD ) compared with HBET and WA , respectively .
Although its clinical relevance has not been definitively demonstrated , this benefit translates to increased MWD of 120 and 210 meters after three months in SET groups .
These increased walking distances are likely to have a positive impact on the lives of patients with IC .
Data provide no clear evidence of a difference between HBET and WA .
Trials show no clear differences in quality of life parameters nor in self-reported functional impairment between SET and HBET .
BACKGROUND Although supervised exercise therapy ( SET ) provides significant symptomatic benefit for patients with intermittent claudication ( IC ) , it remains an underutilized tool .
Widespread implementation of SET is restricted by lack of facilities and funding .
Structured home-based exercise therapy ( HBET ) with an observation component ( e.g. , exercise logbooks , pedometers ) and just walking advice ( WA ) are alternatives to SET .
This is the second up date of a review first published in 2006 .
OBJECTIVES The primary objective was to provide an accurate overview of studies evaluating effects of SET programs , HBET programs , and WA on maximal treadmill walking distance or time ( MWD/T ) for patients with IC .
Secondary objectives were to evaluate effects of SET , HBET , and WA on pain-free treadmill walking distance or time ( PFWD/T ) , quality of life , and self-reported functional impairment .
Effectiveness of Health Promotion Interventions
The purpose of the study was to determine whether patients who participated in an intervention program would improve exercise and foot-care habits , reduce smoking , and would , in turn , have fewer PVD-related illnesses than patients not exposed to the intervention . Eighty-six patients with ankle/ brachial pressure indices of less than 1.0 on one or both legs were r and omly assigned to a study ( N=42 ) or control  ( N=44 ) group . All patients were assessed on a variety of health-related and activity behaviors prior to and again 26 weeks after enrollment in the study . Study patients who participated in the intervention worked with professionals on selecting programs design ed to modify and improve their smoking , exercise , and / or foot-care habits . At the end of 26 weeks , chi-square analysis showed no significant differences between study and control groups on change in smoking and foot care , although the results were in the anticipated direction . Study patients who chose to increase their exercise showed greater increase than control patients in frequency ( p = .001 ) , distance ( p = .007 ) , and length ( p = .002 ) of walks . Although behaviors were modified , especially in the area of exercise , it was felt that longer interventions on a larger sample size are needed
The HBET group did not show improvement in MWD/T compared with the WA group ( SMD 0.30 , 95 % CI -0.45 to 1.05 ; P = 0.43 ; moderate- quality evidence ) .Compared with HBET , SET was more beneficial for PFWD/T but had no effect on quality of life parameters nor on self-reported functional impairment .
Compared with WA , SET was more beneficial for PFWD/T and self-reported functional impairment , as well as for some quality of life parameters ( e.g. , physical functioning , pain , and physical component summary after 12 months ) , and HBET had no effect .
Data show no obvious effects on mortality rates .
Evidence of moderate and high quality shows that SET provides an important benefit for treadmill-measured walking distance ( MWD and PFWD ) compared with HBET and WA , respectively .
Although its clinical relevance has not been definitively demonstrated , this benefit translates to increased MWD of 120 and 210 meters after three months in SET groups .
These increased walking distances are likely to have a positive impact on the lives of patients with IC .
Data provide no clear evidence of a difference between HBET and WA .
Trials show no clear differences in quality of life parameters nor in self-reported functional impairment between SET and HBET .
BACKGROUND Although supervised exercise therapy ( SET ) provides significant symptomatic benefit for patients with intermittent claudication ( IC ) , it remains an underutilized tool .
Widespread implementation of SET is restricted by lack of facilities and funding .
Structured home-based exercise therapy ( HBET ) with an observation component ( e.g. , exercise logbooks , pedometers ) and just walking advice ( WA ) are alternatives to SET .
This is the second up date of a review first published in 2006 .
OBJECTIVES The primary objective was to provide an accurate overview of studies evaluating effects of SET programs , HBET programs , and WA on maximal treadmill walking distance or time ( MWD/T ) for patients with IC .
Secondary objectives were to evaluate effects of SET , HBET , and WA on pain-free treadmill walking distance or time ( PFWD/T ) , quality of life , and self-reported functional impairment .