In primary prevention , the association of BP-lowering treatment with major cardiovascular events was dependent on baseline systolic BP ( SBP ) .
Conclusions and Relevance Primary preventive BP lowering is associated with reduced risk for death and CVD if baseline SBP is 140 mm Hg or higher .
At lower BP levels , treatment is not associated with any benefit in primary prevention but might offer additional protection in patients with CHD
Importance High blood pressure ( BP ) is the most important risk factor for death and cardiovascular disease ( CVD ) worldwide .
The optimal cutoff for treatment of high BP is debated .
Objective To assess the association between BP lowering treatment and death and CVD at different BP levels .
Effects of intensive blood-pressure control in type 2 diabetes mellitus.
BACKGROUND There is no evidence from r and omized trials to support a strategy of lowering systolic blood pressure below 135 to 140 mm Hg in persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus . We investigated whether therapy targeting normal systolic pressure ( i.e. , < 120 mm Hg ) reduces major cardiovascular events in participants with type 2 diabetes at high risk for cardiovascular events . METHODS A total of 4733 participants with type 2 diabetes were r and omly assigned to intensive therapy , targeting a systolic pressure of less than 120 mm Hg , or st and ard therapy , targeting a systolic pressure of less than 140 mm Hg . The primary composite outcome was nonfatal myocardial infa rct ion , nonfatal stroke , or death from cardiovascular causes . The mean follow-up was 4.7 years . RESULTS After 1 year , the mean systolic blood pressure was 119.3 mm Hg in the intensive-therapy group and 133.5 mm Hg in the st and ard-therapy group . The annual rate of the primary outcome was 1.87 % in the intensive-therapy group and 2.09 % in the st and ard-therapy group ( hazard ratio with intensive therapy , 0.88 ; 95 % confidence interval [ CI ] , 0.73 to 1.06 ; P=0.20 ) . The annual rates of death from any cause were 1.28 % and 1.19 % in the two groups , respectively ( hazard ratio , 1.07 ; 95 % CI , 0.85 to 1.35 ; P=0.55 ) . The annual rates of stroke , a prespecified secondary outcome , were 0.32 % and 0.53 % in the two groups , respectively ( hazard ratio , 0.59 ; 95 % CI , 0.39 to 0.89 ; P=0.01 ) . Serious adverse events attributed to antihypertensive treatment occurred in 77 of the 2362 participants in the intensive-therapy group ( 3.3 % ) and 30 of the 2371 participants in the st and ard-therapy group ( 1.3 % ) ( P<0.001 ) . CONCLUSIONS In patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk for cardiovascular events , targeting a systolic blood pressure of less than 120 mm Hg , as compared with less than 140 mm Hg , did not reduce the rate of a composite outcome of fatal and nonfatal major cardiovascular events . ( Clinical Trials.gov number , NCT00000620 .
In primary prevention , the association of BP-lowering treatment with major cardiovascular events was dependent on baseline systolic BP ( SBP ) .
Conclusions and Relevance Primary preventive BP lowering is associated with reduced risk for death and CVD if baseline SBP is 140 mm Hg or higher .
At lower BP levels , treatment is not associated with any benefit in primary prevention but might offer additional protection in patients with CHD
Importance High blood pressure ( BP ) is the most important risk factor for death and cardiovascular disease ( CVD ) worldwide .
The optimal cutoff for treatment of high BP is debated .
Objective To assess the association between BP lowering treatment and death and CVD at different BP levels .