CONCLUSION ART restorations have similar survival rate compared to conventional treatment and can be considered an option to restore occlusoproximal cavities in primary molars
BACKGROUND A previous systematic review showed that atraumatic restorative treatment ( ART ) can be an option to restore the occlusoproximal cavities in primary teeth ; however , few studies fulfilled the criteria of inclusion to generate a high level of evidence .
AIM To up date the existing systematic review and address questions regarding survival rate of ART restorations compared to the conventional approach in occlusoproximal cavities in primary molars .
The effect of GIC-brand on the survival rate of proximal-ART restorations.
BACKGROUND Laboratory studies show diverse behaviour of different br and s of glass-ionomer cements  ( GIC ) . AIM This study investigated the clinical performance [ survival rate ( SR ) ] of three GIC br and s applied to proximal atraumatic restorative treatment ( ART ) restorations . Additionally , the SR of the tooth was evaluated . DESIGN Proximal cavities of 262 primary molars were restored . The patients had been r and omly allocated to two operators and three GIC br and s :  Fuji IX , Hi-Dense , and Maxxion R. Restorations were evaluated after 1 , 6 , 12 , 18 , 24 , 30 , and 36 months . Failed restorations were , if possible , repaired or replaced . Linear regression analyses were used to evaluate the effect of GIC br and , operator , and surface of restoration . Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank test were performed for both restoration survival and tooth survival ( α = 5 % ) . RESULTS After 3 years , 82.4 % of the restorations were evaluated . The SR of the restorations was 24.4 % , and there was no difference among GIC br and s ( log-rank test , P = 0.6 ) . In the first 18 months , a significant operator effect and significantly higher failures in distal surfaces were found . The SR of the tooth was 81.7 % . CONCLUSIONS The SR of proximal ART restorations was relatively low when compared with the SR of the tooth . There are no differences in the performance among the GIC br and s used in the study
CONCLUSION ART restorations have similar survival rate compared to conventional treatment and can be considered an option to restore occlusoproximal cavities in primary molars
BACKGROUND A previous systematic review showed that atraumatic restorative treatment ( ART ) can be an option to restore the occlusoproximal cavities in primary teeth ; however , few studies fulfilled the criteria of inclusion to generate a high level of evidence .
AIM To up date the existing systematic review and address questions regarding survival rate of ART restorations compared to the conventional approach in occlusoproximal cavities in primary molars .