Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
Effect of exercise on biomarkers, fatigue, sleep disturbances, and depressive symptoms in older women with breast cancer receiving hormonal therapy.
PURPOSE / OBJECTIVES To compare the effectiveness of a prescribed home-based walking exercise intervention with usual care in older women receiving hormonal treatment for breast cancer , and to examine relationships among levels of the cortisol , serotonin , interleukin-6 , and bilirubin biomarkers and fatigue , sleep disturbances , and depressive symptoms . DESIGN Longitudinal r and omized clinical trial . SETTING A National Cancer Institute- design ated cancer center in the southeastern United States . SAMPLE 20 women ( aged 55 years or older ) with breast cancer receiving hormonal treatment . METHODS Participants were r and omized to a walking exercise intervention or usual care . Laboratory sample s and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index ( PSQI ) , the Piper Revised Fatigue Scale , and the Center for Epidemiological Studies -Depression Scale were collected at the initial clinic visit and at 12 weeks from the groups . Question naires also were collected at weeks 2 and 14 . MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES Fatigue , sleep disturbances , depressive symptoms , biomarkers , and exercise . FINDINGS Effect of the exercise intervention on sleep scores was highly significant between groups . Exercise group scores on the PSQI decreased significantly over time ( indicating improved sleep quality ) , although scores did not change significantly within the control group . Sleep actigraphy also showed significantly shorter actual wake time and less movement in the exercise group . Serotonin levels also were significantly affected by the intervention . CONCLUSIONS Data suggest that a walking exercise intervention improves sleep in older women receiving hormonal treatment for their breast cancer . Serotonin levels may be a useful biomarker when assessing sleep disturbances in this group . IMPLICATION S FOR NURSING Clinicians need to be aware that older women receiving hormonal treatment for their breast cancer may experience fatigue , sleep disturbances , and depressive symptoms . Homebased walking activity may reduce symptom severity in this group
Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?