Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
A randomized trial to increase physical activity in breast cancer survivors.
PURPOSE Interventions to increase physical activity among breast cancer survivors are needed to improve health and quality of life and possibly to reduce the risk of disease recurrence and early mortality . Therefore , we report the feasibility and preliminary outcomes of a pilot r and omized trial design ed to increase physical activity in sedentary breast cancer survivors receiving hormone therapy . METHODS Forty-one sedentary women on estrogen receptor modulators or aromatase inhibitors for stage I , II , or IIIA breast cancer were r and omly assigned to receive a 12-wk multidisciplinary physical activity behavior change intervention or usual care . RESULTS Recruitment was 34 % , intervention adherence was 99 % , and complete follow-up data were obtained on 93 % . Most participants ( 93 % ) were white with mean age of 53 + /- 9 yr . Differences favoring the intervention group were noted for accelerometer physical activity counts ( mean difference = 72,103 ; 95 % confidence interval ( CI ) = 25,383 - 119,000 ; effect size ( d ) = 1.02 ; P = 0.004 ) , aerobic fitness ( mean difference = 2.9 ; 95 % CI = -0.1 to 5.8 ; d = 0.64 ; P = 0.058 ) , back/leg muscle strength ( mean difference = 12.3 ; 95 % CI = 0.4 - 15.9 ; d = 0.81 ; P = 0.017 ) , waist-to-hip ratio ( mean difference = -0.05 ; 95 % CI = -0.01 to -0.08 ; d = -0.77 ; P = 0.018 ) , and social well-being ( mean difference = 2.0 ; 95 % CI = 0.3 - 3.8 ; d = 0.76 ; P = 0.03 ) . However , the intervention group also reported a greater increase in joint stiffness ( mean difference = 1.1 ; 95 % CI = 0.1 - 2.2 ; d = 0.70 ; P = 0.04 ) . CONCLUSIONS A behavior change intervention for breast cancer survivors based on the social cognitive theory is feasible and results in potentially meaningful improvements in physical activity and selected health outcomes . Confirmation in a larger study is warranted
Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?