There was no major difference in the rate of complications .
Conclusions Short-term recovery favors limited incision over st and ard incision THA .
Background The literature comparing  limited incision and st and ard incision THAs  is confusing regarding whether limited incision THA improves short-term recovery without compromising long-term durability and survival .
Further , previously published meta-analyses can not conclude that limited incision THA is better .
With new data , we seek to discover if the answers now exist .
Purpose We used meta- analysis to compare surgical and hospitalization data , clinical outcomes , and complication rates , and thus ( 1 ) confirm whether limited incision THA is at least comparable to st and ard incision THA ; and ( 2 ) determine whether limited incision THA is an improvement over st and ard incision THA .
Mini-incision technique for total hip arthroplasty with navigation.
This prospect i ve study compares a mini-incision technique and traditional posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty ( THA ) . Thirty-three patients who had undergone a mini-incision THA were matched by diagnosis , gender , average age , and preoperative Harris Hip Score ( HHS ) to 33 patients who had undergone THA using the traditional posterior approach .  The average length of the incision for group 1 was 11.7 cm ( range , 7.3 - 13.0 ) and for group 2 was 20.2 cm ( range , 14.8 - 26.0 ) . At the 3-month follow-up , patients in the mini-incision group had significant improvement in limp ( P<.05 ) and ability to climb stairs ( P < .01 ) compared with the traditional group . At the 6 month follow-up , the mini-incision group was significantly better in terms of limp ( P < .05 ) , distance walked ( P<.001 ) , and stairs ( P < 0.001 ) . There was no significant difference between groups for pain , function , or range of motion at the 1-year follow-up examination
There was no major difference in the rate of complications .
Conclusions Short-term recovery favors limited incision over st and ard incision THA .
Background The literature comparing  limited incision and st and ard incision THAs  is confusing regarding whether limited incision THA improves short-term recovery without compromising long-term durability and survival .
Further , previously published meta-analyses can not conclude that limited incision THA is better .
With new data , we seek to discover if the answers now exist .
Purpose We used meta- analysis to compare surgical and hospitalization data , clinical outcomes , and complication rates , and thus ( 1 ) confirm whether limited incision THA is at least comparable to st and ard incision THA ; and ( 2 ) determine whether limited incision THA is an improvement over st and ard incision THA .