There was an increased risk of non-serious AEs with cannabinoids compared with placebo .
Conclusions There was moderate evidence to support cannabinoids in treating chronic , non-cancer pain at 2 weeks .
Similar results were observed at later time points , but the confidence in effect is low .
There is little evidence that cannabinoids increase the risk of experiencing serious AEs , although non-serious AEs may be common in the short-term period following use
Background For patients with chronic , non-cancer pain , traditional pain-relieving medications include opioids , which have shown benefits but are associated with increased risks of addiction and adverse effects .
Medical cannabis has emerged as a treatment alternative for managing these patients and there has been a rise in the number of r and omized clinical trials in recent years ; therefore , a systematic review of the evidence was warranted .
Objective To analyze the evidence surrounding the benefits and harms of medical cannabinoids in the treatment of chronic , non-cancer-related pain .
Does the cannabinoid dronabinol reduce central pain in multiple sclerosis? Randomised double blind placebo controlled crossover trial
Abstract Objective To evaluate the effect of the oral synthetic δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol dronabinol on central neuropathic pain in patients with multiple sclerosis . Design R and omised double blind placebo controlled crossovertrial . Setting Outpatient clinic , University Hospital of Aarhus , Denmark . Participants 24 patients aged between 23 and 55 years with multiple sclerosis and central pain . Intervention Orally administered dronabinol at a maximum doseof 10 mg daily or corresponding placebo for three weeks ( 15 - 21days ) , separated by a three week washout period . Main outcome measure Median spontaneous pain intensity ( numericalrating scale ) in the last week of treatment . Results Median spontaneous pain intensity was significantlylower during dronabinol treatment than during placebo treatment(4.0 ( 25th to 75th centiles 2.3 to 6.0 ) v 5.0 ( 4.0 to 6.4),P = 0.02 ) , and median pain relief score ( numerical rating scale)was higher ( 3.0 ( 0 to 6.7 ) v > 0 ( 0 to 2.3 ) , P = 0.035 ) . Thenumber needed to treat for 50 % pain relief was 3.5 ( 95 % confidenceinterval 1.9 to 24.8 ) . On the SF-36 quality of life scale , thetwo items bodily pain and mental health indicated benefits fromactive treatment compared with placebo . The number of patients with adverse events was higher during active treatment , especiallyin the first week of treatment . The functional ability of themultiple sclerosis patients did not change . Conclusions Dronabinol has a modest but clinical ly relevantanalgesic effect on central pain in patients with multiple sclerosis . Adverse events , including dizziness , were more frequent withdronabinol than with placebo during the first week of treatment
There was an increased risk of non-serious AEs with cannabinoids compared with placebo .
Conclusions There was moderate evidence to support cannabinoids in treating chronic , non-cancer pain at 2 weeks .
Similar results were observed at later time points , but the confidence in effect is low .
There is little evidence that cannabinoids increase the risk of experiencing serious AEs , although non-serious AEs may be common in the short-term period following use
Background For patients with chronic , non-cancer pain , traditional pain-relieving medications include opioids , which have shown benefits but are associated with increased risks of addiction and adverse effects .
Medical cannabis has emerged as a treatment alternative for managing these patients and there has been a rise in the number of r and omized clinical trials in recent years ; therefore , a systematic review of the evidence was warranted .
Objective To analyze the evidence surrounding the benefits and harms of medical cannabinoids in the treatment of chronic , non-cancer-related pain .