In claudication patients , SE is more effective than UE at improving maximal walking and claudication distances , yet there is no difference in general quality of life or patient-reported community-based walking .
BACKGROUND Supervised exercise ( SE ) is widely accepted as an effective therapy for intermittent claudication ( IC ) , but its use is limited by cost .
Unsupervised exercise ( UE ) represents a less costly alternative .
We assessed the comparative effectiveness of SE vs UE in patients with IC .
Impact of exercise training on inflammation and platelet activation in patients with intermittent claudication.
BACKGROUND Serum markers of inflammation and platelet activation are related to cardiovascular risk . Cardiovascular risk reduction is a major treatment goal in patients with peripheral arterial disease ( PAD ) . Although current guidelines recommend supervised exercise training ( SET ) for PAD patients with intermittent claudication , its contribution to risk reduction remains unclear . Aim of the present study was to assess the impact of SET on inflammation and platelet activation as surrogates for cardiovascular risk . METHODS Fifty-three patients with intermittent claudication were r and omly assigned to SET on top of best medical treatment ( BMT ) for 6 months ( SET-group ) or to BMT only ( BMT-group ) . High sensitivity C-reactive protein ( hs-CRP ) , interleukin-6 ( IL-6 ) and fibrinogen as well as soluble P-selectin ( sP-sel ) , prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 ( F1.2 ) and monocyte-platelet aggregates ( MPA ) were determined at study entry , after 3 , 6 and 12 months . RESULTS While clinical improvement , reflected by an increase of walking capacity , was observed upon SET , no lasting changes of markers of inflammation and platelet activation were found within the SET-group during the training period . Compared to the BMT-group no improvements of these markers were observed in response to training at any time point ( all p > 0.05 ) . CONCLUSION Regular SET added no further anti-inflammatory effect and had no effect on platelet activation when provided on top of BMT in PAD patients with intermittent claudication
In claudication patients , SE is more effective than UE at improving maximal walking and claudication distances , yet there is no difference in general quality of life or patient-reported community-based walking .
BACKGROUND Supervised exercise ( SE ) is widely accepted as an effective therapy for intermittent claudication ( IC ) , but its use is limited by cost .
Unsupervised exercise ( UE ) represents a less costly alternative .
We assessed the comparative effectiveness of SE vs UE in patients with IC .