In general , estimates of construct validity were lower when vali date d against dissimilar constructs , except for instruments measuring impairments in mental functions .
CONCLUSION There is a trend that validation against a similar construct yields higher correlation coefficients than validation against a dissimilar construct .
PURPOSE This paper focuses on the construct validity of instruments measuring impairments in body structures and function in rheumatic disorders .
The objective is : 1 ) to make an inventory of constructs , based on the domains of the International Classification of Functioning , Disabilities and Health problems ( ICF ) , against which instruments measuring impairments in body structures and function were vali date d ; 2 ) to analyse whether validation against a similar construct result ed in higher correlation coefficients than validation against a dissimilar construct .
The Beck Depression Inventory, Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), and General Well-Being Schedule depression subscale in rheumatoid arthritis. Criterion contamination of responses.
Three widely used  depression scales -- the  Beck Depression Inventory ( BDI ) , Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale ( CES-D ) , and  General Well-Being Schedule depression subscale (GWB-D)--were studied in rheumatoid arthritis ( RA ) . Twenty-three rheumatologists identified 19 of the 45 items on these three question naires as likely to differ in patients with RA and control subjects because of the presence of RA , regardless of psychological status . Responses to 13 of these 19 individual scale items , design ated as " RA-related items , " differed significantly in 41 RA patients versus 57 age-matched control subjects . Only three of the other 26 items differed significantly in the two groups . These data extend evidence that responses of people with RA on widely used depression scales might be affected by somatic disease regardless of psychological status
In general , estimates of construct validity were lower when vali date d against dissimilar constructs , except for instruments measuring impairments in mental functions .
CONCLUSION There is a trend that validation against a similar construct yields higher correlation coefficients than validation against a dissimilar construct .
PURPOSE This paper focuses on the construct validity of instruments measuring impairments in body structures and function in rheumatic disorders .
The objective is : 1 ) to make an inventory of constructs , based on the domains of the International Classification of Functioning , Disabilities and Health problems ( ICF ) , against which instruments measuring impairments in body structures and function were vali date d ; 2 ) to analyse whether validation against a similar construct result ed in higher correlation coefficients than validation against a dissimilar construct .