There is limited evidence to suggest which ablation method was the best .
There is limited evidence to suggest that CA may be a better treatment option compared to medical therapies in the management of persistent AF .
This review was also unable to recommend the best CA method
BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia seen in cardiovascular departments .
Treatments include medical interventions and catheter ablation .
Due to uncertainties in medical therapies for AF , and the need to continue sinus rhythm , ablation has been recently considered as a viable alternative .
Many new ablation methods based on pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) have been developed .
OBJECTIVES The primary objective of this review was to assess the beneficial and harmful effects of  catheter ablation ( CA ) in comparison with medical treatment in patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF .
The secondary objective was to determine the best regimen of CA .
Is circumferential pulmonary vein isolation preferable to stepwise segmental pulmonary vein isolation for patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?
BACKGROUND Stepwise segmental pulmonary vein isolation ( SPVI ) and circumferential pulmonary vein isolation ( CPVI ) have been developed to treat patients with atrial fibrillation ( AF ) , but the preferable approach for paroxysmal AF ( PAF ) has not been established . METHODS AND RESULTS One hundred and ten patients with symptomatic PAF were r and omized into a stepwise SPVI group ( n=55 ) or CPVI group ( n=55 ) . Systemic SPVI combined with left atrial linear ablation tailored by inducibility of AF was performed in the stepwise SPVI group . Circumferential linear ablation around the left and right-sided pulmonary veins ( PVs ) guided by 3-dimensional electroanatomic mapping was performed in the CPVI group . The endpoints of ablation are non-induciblity of AF in the stepwise SPVI group and continuity of circular lesions combined with PV isolation in the CPVI group . After the initial procedures , atrial tachyarrhythmis ( ATa ) recurred within the first 3 months in 23 of the 55 patients ( 41.8 % ) who underwent stepwise SPVI and in 20 of the 55 patients ( 36.4 % ) who had CPVI ( p=0.69 ) . Repeat procedures were performed in 7 patients from the stepwise SPVI group and 5 from the CPVI group ( p=0.76 ) . During the 3 - 9 months after the last procedure , 46 patients ( 83.6 % ) from the CPVI group and 43 ( 78.2 % ) from the stepwise SPVI group did not have symptomatic ATa while not taking anti-arrhythmic drugs ( p=0.63 ) . Severe subcutaneous hematoma or PV stenosis occurred in 3 patients . CONCLUSIONS The efficacy of stepwise SPVI is comparable to that of CPVI for patients with PAF
There is limited evidence to suggest which ablation method was the best .
There is limited evidence to suggest that CA may be a better treatment option compared to medical therapies in the management of persistent AF .
This review was also unable to recommend the best CA method
BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia seen in cardiovascular departments .
Treatments include medical interventions and catheter ablation .
Due to uncertainties in medical therapies for AF , and the need to continue sinus rhythm , ablation has been recently considered as a viable alternative .
Many new ablation methods based on pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) have been developed .
OBJECTIVES The primary objective of this review was to assess the beneficial and harmful effects of  catheter ablation ( CA ) in comparison with medical treatment in patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF .
The secondary objective was to determine the best regimen of CA .