There were no significant differences regarding the biomechanical axis or frontal femoral and individual tibial component alignment .
Conclusion This systematic review and meta- analysis demonstrate that alignment with MRI-based PSI is at least as good as , if not better than , that with CT-based PSI .
Purpose Patient-specific instruments ( PSIs ) are already in relatively common use , and their post-operative radiographic results are equal to those for total knee arthroplasty ( TKA ) with conventional instrumentation .
PSI use requires a preoperative MRI scan , CT scan , or a combination of MRI and a long-leg st and ing radiograph .
However , there is no consensus as to which of these modalities , MRI or CT , is the preferred imaging modality when performing TKA with PSIs .
Patient-matched instruments versus standard instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study
Summary Background Optimal positioning of implants and restoration of neutral mechanical axis are two primary surgical goals in total knee arthroplasty ( TKA ) . Despite modern instruments and improved surgical techniques , malalignment remains an important cause of early failure after TKA . The aim of this prospect i ve r and omized study was to compare the value of a new patient-matched instrument system ( PMI ) ( SignatureTM ; Biomet , Inc , Warsaw , Indiana ) to that of st and ard TKA surgical instrumentation ( STD ) in terms of coronal mechanical alignment , time of operation and blood loss . Patients and methods A total of 38 patients waiting for primary TKA were enrolled and r and omized into two groups ( 19 PMI and 19 STD ) . Magnetic resonance imaging was performed in all patients in the PMI group , and specific instruments for the femur and tibia were design ed preoperatively . All patients were operated on using the st and ard medial parapatellar approach with no use of tourniquet . Mechanical axis , time for the operation , and blood loss were evaluated . Results Patients in both groups had comparable age , body mass index , preoperative mechanical axis , Knee Society Score , and level of hemoglobin . Postoperative results showed that the PMI group fell significantly closer to neutral mechanical axis ( STD : 2.7 ± 1.7 , PMI : 1.7 ± 0.9 ; P = 0.013 ) with no outliers and a reduced time for the operation . There was no difference in the evaluation blood loss . Conclusions The use of PMI can contribute in achieving better mechanical axis with reduction in outliers and decreased operation time . Due to small differences between PMI and st and ard instruments , additional research are needed to confirm these preliminary results , and to discover potential benefits and functional improvements in the long-term outcome
There were no significant differences regarding the biomechanical axis or frontal femoral and individual tibial component alignment .
Conclusion This systematic review and meta- analysis demonstrate that alignment with MRI-based PSI is at least as good as , if not better than , that with CT-based PSI .
Purpose Patient-specific instruments ( PSIs ) are already in relatively common use , and their post-operative radiographic results are equal to those for total knee arthroplasty ( TKA ) with conventional instrumentation .
PSI use requires a preoperative MRI scan , CT scan , or a combination of MRI and a long-leg st and ing radiograph .
However , there is no consensus as to which of these modalities , MRI or CT , is the preferred imaging modality when performing TKA with PSIs .