The potential benefit of socket preservation therapies was demonstrated result ing in significantly less vertical and horizontal contraction of the alveolar bone crest .
The scientific evidence does not provide clear guidelines in regards to the type of bio material , or surgical procedure , although a significant positive effect of the flapped surgery was observed .
There are no data available to draw conclusions on the consequences of such benefits on the long-term outcomes of implant therapy
OBJECTIVE This systematic review aims to evaluate the scientific evidence on the efficacy in the surgical protocol s design ed for preserving the alveolar ridge after tooth extraction and to evaluate how these techniques affect the placement of dental implants and the final implant supported restoration .
Histological comparison of healing extraction sockets implanted with bioactive glass or demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft: a pilot study.
BACKGROUND Various material s have been used immediately following tooth extraction to fill and /or cover the socket in an attempt to limit or prevent ridge resorption . The purpose of the present pilot study was to establish a reliable model to investigate the effect of various bone graft and bone replacement material s on extraction socket healing . This study also compared healing extraction sockets 6 to 8 months postimplantation of a bioactive glass ( BG ) or demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft ( DFDBA ) to an unfilled socket control ( C ) . METHODS Following tooth extraction , a total of 30 sockets in 19 patients were r and omly divided into 3 treatment groups : 10 sockets received BG , 10 sockets DFDBA , and 10 sockets served as unfilled controls . Primary coverage was achieved by flap advancement over each socket . Six to 8 months post extraction at time of implant placement , histological cores of the treatment sites were obtained . These cores were processed , undecalcified sections prepared and stained with Stevenel blue/van Gieson 's picric fuchsin , and histomorphometrically analyzed . Vital bone , connective tissue and marrow , and residual graft particles were reported as a percentage of the total core . RESULTS A model system was described in humans and used to evaluate the healing response in the 3 treatment groups . Results concluded that mean vital bone present was 59.5 % for BG- , 34.7 % for DFDBA- , and 32.4 % for C-treated sites . These differences were not statistically significant . However , the residual implant material was significantly higher in DFDBA-treated ( 13.5 % ) versus BG-treated sockets ( 5.5 % ) . CONCLUSIONS Although the differences in percent vital bone were not statistically significant among the 3 treatment groups in this pilot study , BG material was observed to act as an osteoconductive material which had a positive effect on socket healing at 6 to 8 months post extraction . Further research following implant placement in treated and control sockets is warranted to determine if bone implant contact is improved in BG-filled versus unfilled sockets
The potential benefit of socket preservation therapies was demonstrated result ing in significantly less vertical and horizontal contraction of the alveolar bone crest .
The scientific evidence does not provide clear guidelines in regards to the type of bio material , or surgical procedure , although a significant positive effect of the flapped surgery was observed .
There are no data available to draw conclusions on the consequences of such benefits on the long-term outcomes of implant therapy
OBJECTIVE This systematic review aims to evaluate the scientific evidence on the efficacy in the surgical protocol s design ed for preserving the alveolar ridge after tooth extraction and to evaluate how these techniques affect the placement of dental implants and the final implant supported restoration .