The results of this review demonstrate that tests do exist that change the probability of the disc or SIJ ( but not the facet joint ) as the source of low back pain .
Clinical practice guidelines state that the tissue source of low back pain can not be specified in the majority of patients .
However , there has been no systematic review of the accuracy of diagnostic tests used to identify the source of low back pain .
The aim of this systematic review was therefore to determine the diagnostic accuracy of tests available to clinicians to identify the disc , facet joint or sacroiliac joint ( SIJ ) as the source of low back pain .
Prevalence of lumbar facet joint pain in chronic low back pain.
This prospect i ve study was design ed to determine the prevalence of lumbar facet joint pain in a consecutive series of patients with chronic low back pain treated at an interventional , multidisciplinary private pain management practice utilizing double diagnostic blocks , to determine the prevalence of false positive rate of uncontrolled facet joint blocks , and to determine the relationship of clinical features of responders and non-responders to double diagnostic blocks . One hundred and twenty patients with low back pain with or without lower extremity pain were selected . The procedure consisted of diagnostic blocks using lidocaine and bupivacaine on separate occasions , usually two weeks apart . Each facet joint nerve was infiltrated with either 0.4 to 0.6 ml of 1 % lidocaine ( Xylocaine(R ) ) or 1 % lidocaine ( Xylocaine(R ) ) and 0.25 % bupivacaine ( Marcaine(R ) ) . A definite response was defined as substantial with at least 75 % relief of pain in the symptomatic area following local anesthetic block . Confirmatory blocks using bupivacaine 0.25 % were performed at the same levels as the first injection if definite relief was obtained . The response to bupivacaine blocks which lasted longer than the lidocaine blocks was accepted as a positive response . All blocks were performed under fluoroscopic guidance . Eighty-one patients ( 67.5 % ) reported a definite response to lidocaine blocks . Confirmatory blocks with bupivacaine were performed in all 81 patients with 54 patients , i.e. 45 % of total sample or 66.6 % of lidocaine positive group reporting definite response with a false positive rate of 41 % . Prevalence and relationship of pain referral pattern in patients with and without facet joint pain confirmed by double blocks showed no significant correlation . We found no relationship between the history , physical findings , age , gender , trauma , duration of pain , and diagnostic blocks . However , history of previous surgery showed a negative correlation as only 29 % of the patients after previous surgery were positive in contrast to 51 % of the nonsurgical population . The results of this study echo previous concerns of reliability of uncontrolled single blocks , history , and clinical features . This study demonstrated that the facet joint is a source of pain in 45 % of the patients suffering with chronic low back pain in an interventional pain management setting in a private practice
The results of this review demonstrate that tests do exist that change the probability of the disc or SIJ ( but not the facet joint ) as the source of low back pain .
Clinical practice guidelines state that the tissue source of low back pain can not be specified in the majority of patients .
However , there has been no systematic review of the accuracy of diagnostic tests used to identify the source of low back pain .
The aim of this systematic review was therefore to determine the diagnostic accuracy of tests available to clinicians to identify the disc , facet joint or sacroiliac joint ( SIJ ) as the source of low back pain .