Results showed that mechanical active irrigation reduces post-operative pain .
It improved debridement , canal/isthmus cleanliness .
It also improved delivery of irrigant up to working length .
Bacterial count was more with active irrigation , though not significant .
There is no effect on long-term periapical healing .
Conclusion It may be concluded that mechanical active irrigation devices are beneficial in reducing post-operative pain and improving canal and isthmus cleanliness during Endodontics
Objective Irrigant activation has been cl aim ed to be beneficial in in vitro and clinical studies .
This systematic review aims to investigate the clinical efficiency of mechanically activated irrigants and conventional irrigation .
Postoperative pain after the application of two different irrigation devices in a prospective randomized clinical trial.
INTRODUCTION The extrusion of irrigation solutions beyond the apical constriction may result in postoperative pain .  Sodium hypochlorite can cause severe tissue irritation and necrosis outside the root canal system if extruded into the periodontal ligament ( PDL ) space . Different delivery techniques were discussed to reduce this potential risk . The aim of this study was to compare the postoperative level of pain after root canal therapy using either endodontic needle irrigation or a negative apical pressure device . MATERIAL AND METHODS In a prospect i ve r and omized clinical trial , 110 asymptomatic single-rooted anterior and premolar teeth were treated endodontically with two different irrigation techniques . The teeth were r and omly assigned to two groups . In the MP group ( n = 55 ) , procedures were performed using an endodontic irrigating syringe ( Max-i-Probe ; Dentsply Rinn , Elgin , IL ) . The EV group ( n = 55 ) used an irrigation device based on negative apical pressure ( EndoVac ; Discus Dental , Culver City , CA ) . Postoperatively , the patients were prescribed ibuprofen 200 mg to take every 8 hours if required . Pain levels were assessed by an analog scale question naire after 4 , 24 , and 48 hours . The amount of ibuprofen taken was recorded at the same time intervals . RESULTS During the 0- to 4- , 4- to 24- , and 24- to 48-hour intervals after treatment , the pain experience with the negative apical pressure device was significantly lower than when using the needle irrigation ( p < 0.0001 [ 4 , 24 , 48 hours ] ) . Between 0 and 4 and 4 and 24 hours , the intake of analgesics was significantly lower in the group treated by the negative apical pressure device ( p < 0.0001 [ 0 - 4 hours ] , p = 0.001 [ 4 - 24 hours ] ) . The difference for the 24- to 48-hour period was not statistically different ( p = 0.08 ) . The Pearson correlation coefficient revealed a strongly positive and significant relationship for the MP group ( r = 0.851 , p < 0.001 ) and the EV group ( r = 0.596 , p < 0.0001 ) between pain intensity and the amount of analgesics . CONCLUSION The outcome of this investigation indicates that the use of a negative apical pressure irrigation device can result in a significant reduction of postoperative pain levels in comparison to conventional needle irrigation
Results showed that mechanical active irrigation reduces post-operative pain .
It improved debridement , canal/isthmus cleanliness .
It also improved delivery of irrigant up to working length .
Bacterial count was more with active irrigation , though not significant .
There is no effect on long-term periapical healing .
Conclusion It may be concluded that mechanical active irrigation devices are beneficial in reducing post-operative pain and improving canal and isthmus cleanliness during Endodontics
Objective Irrigant activation has been cl aim ed to be beneficial in in vitro and clinical studies .
This systematic review aims to investigate the clinical efficiency of mechanically activated irrigants and conventional irrigation .