Pooled net change in systolic blood pressure ( 16 trials ) was -1.86 ( 95 % CI -3.17 to -0.55 ; p=0.01 ) mm Hg ; diastolic blood pressure ( 15 trials ) , -1.53 ( -2.43 to -0.62 ; p=0.001 ) mm Hg ; body mass index ( 14 trials ) , -0.13 ( -0.26 to -0.01 ; p=0.04 ) kg/m2 ; serum total cholesterol ( 14 trials ) , -0.13 ( -0.19 to -0.07 ; p<0.001 ) mmol/L. There was no significant association between interventions with a reported theoretical basis and improved intervention outcomes .
No association was observed between intervention intensity ( number of sessions and intervention duration ) and intervention outcomes .
MHBC interventions delivered to CVD-free participants in primary care did not appear to have quantitatively important effects on CVD risk factors .
BACKGROUND It is uncertain whether multiple health behaviour change ( MHBC ) interventions are effective for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease ( CVD ) in primary care .
Cardiovascular risk management and its impact on hypertension control in primary care in low-resource settings: a cluster-randomized trial.
OBJECTIVE To evaluate a simple cardiovascular risk management package for assessing and managing cardiovascular risk using hypertension as an entry point in primary care facilities in low-re source setting s. METHODS Two geographically distant regions in two countries ( China and Nigeria ) were selected and 10 pairs of primary care facilities in each region were r and omly selected and matched . Regions were then r and omly assigned to a control group , which received usual care , or to an intervention group , which applied the cardiovascular risk management package . Each facility enrolled 60 consecutive patients with hypertension . Intervention sites educated patients about risk factors at baseline and initiated treatment with hydrochlorothiazide at 4 months in patients at medium risk of a cardiovascular event , according to a st and ardized treatment algorithm . Systolic blood pressure change from baseline to 12 months was the primary outcome measure . FINDINGS The study included 2397 patients with baseline hypertension : 1191 in 20 intervention facilities and 1206 in 20 control facilities .  Systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreased more in intervention patients than in controls . However , at 12 months more than half of patients still had uncontrolled hypertension ( systolic blood pressure > 140 mmHg and /or diastolic blood pressure > 90 mmHg ) . Behavioural risk factors had improved among intervention patients in Nigeria but not in China . Only about 2 % of hypertensive patients required referral to the next level of care . CONCLUSION Even in low-re source setting s , hypertensive patients can be effectively assessed and managed in primary care facilities
Pooled net change in systolic blood pressure ( 16 trials ) was -1.86 ( 95 % CI -3.17 to -0.55 ; p=0.01 ) mm Hg ; diastolic blood pressure ( 15 trials ) , -1.53 ( -2.43 to -0.62 ; p=0.001 ) mm Hg ; body mass index ( 14 trials ) , -0.13 ( -0.26 to -0.01 ; p=0.04 ) kg/m2 ; serum total cholesterol ( 14 trials ) , -0.13 ( -0.19 to -0.07 ; p<0.001 ) mmol/L. There was no significant association between interventions with a reported theoretical basis and improved intervention outcomes .
No association was observed between intervention intensity ( number of sessions and intervention duration ) and intervention outcomes .
MHBC interventions delivered to CVD-free participants in primary care did not appear to have quantitatively important effects on CVD risk factors .
BACKGROUND It is uncertain whether multiple health behaviour change ( MHBC ) interventions are effective for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease ( CVD ) in primary care .