There is uncertainty whether current strategies for providing CVD risk scores  affect CVD events .
Providing CVD risk scores may slightly reduce CVD risk factor levels and may increase preventive medication prescribing in higher-risk people without evidence of harm .
BACKGROUND The current paradigm for cardiovascular disease ( CVD ) emphasises absolute risk assessment to guide treatment decisions in primary prevention .
Although the derivation and validation of multivariable risk assessment tools , or CVD risk scores , have attracted considerable attention , their effect on clinical outcomes is uncertain .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of evaluating and providing CVD risk scores in adults without prevalent CVD on cardiovascular outcomes , risk factor levels , preventive medication prescribing , and health behaviours .
Shared electronic vascular risk decision support in primary care: Computerization of Medical Practices for the Enhancement of Therapeutic Effectiveness (COMPETE III) randomized trial.
BACKGROUND Computerized decision support systems ( CDSSs ) linked with electronic medical records ( EMRs ) are promoted as an effective means of improving patient care . However , very few high- quality studies are set in routine , community-based clinical care , and no consistent evidence of an effect on patient outcomes has been found . METHODS A r and omized controlled trial among EMR-using primary care practice s in Ontario , Canada . Patients 55 years or older with previous vascular events , diabetes mellitus , hypertension , or hypercholesterolemia were r and omized to the Computerization of Medical Practice s for the Enhancement of Therapeutic Effectiveness ( COMPETE III ) CDSS intervention or to usual care . The intervention included personally tailored electronic vascular risk monitoring and treatment advice shared between the physician and patient , risk calculation , and a clinical re source . The primary outcome was a composite score of 8 recommended process outcomes at 1 year . Data collectors were blinded to group allocation . Analysis used the intention-to-treat principle with multiple imputation for missing data . RESULTS We r and omized and included in the analysis 1102 patients in 49 community-based physician practice s ( 53.4 % female ; mean age , 69.1 years ; 28.0 % with a previous vascular event ) . The intervention group ( 545 [ 49.5 % ] ) had a significantly greater improvement in mean process composite , with a difference of 4.70 ( P < .001 ) on a 27-point scale . Intervention patients had significantly higher odds of rating their continuity of care ( 4.18 ; P < .001 ) and their ability to improve their vascular health ( 3.07 ; P < .001 ) as improved . Despite this improvement , the clinical outcomes -vascular events , clinical variables , and quality of life-were not improved . CONCLUSION Despite favorable review s and important improvements in the complex processes required to reduce vascular risk , clinical outcomes remain unchanged
There is uncertainty whether current strategies for providing CVD risk scores  affect CVD events .
Providing CVD risk scores may slightly reduce CVD risk factor levels and may increase preventive medication prescribing in higher-risk people without evidence of harm .
BACKGROUND The current paradigm for cardiovascular disease ( CVD ) emphasises absolute risk assessment to guide treatment decisions in primary prevention .
Although the derivation and validation of multivariable risk assessment tools , or CVD risk scores , have attracted considerable attention , their effect on clinical outcomes is uncertain .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of evaluating and providing CVD risk scores in adults without prevalent CVD on cardiovascular outcomes , risk factor levels , preventive medication prescribing , and health behaviours .