Conclusion The Timed Up and Go test has limited ability to predict  falls in community dwelling elderly and should not be used in isolation to identify individuals at high risk of falls in this setting
Background The Timed Up and Go test ( TUG ) is a commonly used screening tool to assist clinicians to identify patients at risk of falling .
The purpose of this systematic review and meta- analysis is to determine the overall predictive value of the TUG in community-dwelling older adults .
A pilot study to explore the predictive validity of 4 measures of falls risk in frail elderly patients.
OBJECTIVES To test the hypothesis that scores on 4 falls risk measures  will differ significantly in patients reporting recurrent falls compared with those who do not ; and to explore the validity of each measure to predict such falls status . DESIGN A convenience sample was tested to establish the sensitivity and specificity of the  Functional Reach Test , Timed Up & Go test , one-leg stance test ( OLST )  , and  balance subsection of the Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment ( B-POMA ) . A 12-month retrospective falls history was used to identify recurrent fallers . SETTING A day hospital for the elderly . PARTICIPANTS Convenience sample of 30 day hospital patients . The inclusion criteria were : ability to rise from a chair and walk 6 m ; no severe cognitive impairment or blindness ; age 65 years or older . INTERVENTIONS Not applicable . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Scores on the 4 tests and retrospective falls histories . RESULTS Scores on the B-POMA and OLST showed significant differences between fallers and nonfallers ( P<.05 ) . An  OLST time of 1.02 seconds or less ( odds ratio [OR]=15.2 ; 95 % confidence interval [ CI ] , 1.72 - 133.95 ) and B-POMA score of 11 or less ( OR=18.5 ; 95 % CI , 2.05 - 167.79 ) were predictive of day hospital patients having a history of recurrent falls . CONCLUSIONS OLST and B-POMA both have potential as screening tools for risk of falls , but this observation requires confirmation in a prospect i ve study
Conclusion The Timed Up and Go test has limited ability to predict  falls in community dwelling elderly and should not be used in isolation to identify individuals at high risk of falls in this setting
Background The Timed Up and Go test ( TUG ) is a commonly used screening tool to assist clinicians to identify patients at risk of falling .
The purpose of this systematic review and meta- analysis is to determine the overall predictive value of the TUG in community-dwelling older adults .