The HBET group did not show improvement in MWD/T compared with the WA group ( SMD 0.30 , 95 % CI -0.45 to 1.05 ; P = 0.43 ; moderate- quality evidence ) .Compared with HBET , SET was more beneficial for PFWD/T but had no effect on quality of life parameters nor on self-reported functional impairment .
Compared with WA , SET was more beneficial for PFWD/T and self-reported functional impairment , as well as for some quality of life parameters ( e.g. , physical functioning , pain , and physical component summary after 12 months ) , and HBET had no effect .
Data show no obvious effects on mortality rates .
Evidence of moderate and high quality shows that SET provides an important benefit for treadmill-measured walking distance ( MWD and PFWD ) compared with HBET and WA , respectively .
Although its clinical relevance has not been definitively demonstrated , this benefit translates to increased MWD of 120 and 210 meters after three months in SET groups .
These increased walking distances are likely to have a positive impact on the lives of patients with IC .
Data provide no clear evidence of a difference between HBET and WA .
Trials show no clear differences in quality of life parameters nor in self-reported functional impairment between SET and HBET .
BACKGROUND Although supervised exercise therapy ( SET ) provides significant symptomatic benefit for patients with intermittent claudication ( IC ) , it remains an underutilized tool .
Widespread implementation of SET is restricted by lack of facilities and funding .
Structured home-based exercise therapy ( HBET ) with an observation component ( e.g. , exercise logbooks , pedometers ) and just walking advice ( WA ) are alternatives to SET .
This is the second up date of a review first published in 2006 .
OBJECTIVES The primary objective was to provide an accurate overview of studies evaluating effects of SET programs , HBET programs , and WA on maximal treadmill walking distance or time ( MWD/T ) for patients with IC .
Secondary objectives were to evaluate effects of SET , HBET , and WA on pain-free treadmill walking distance or time ( PFWD/T ) , quality of life , and self-reported functional impairment .
Peripheral arterial disease and intermittent claudication: efficacy of short-term upper body strength training, dynamic exercise training, and advice to exercise at home.
OBJECTIVE To compare the effect of two training programmes and advice to exercise at home on physiological adaptations in patients with peripheral arterial disease ( PAD ) . DESIGN 30 patients with a typical history of PAD and intermittent claudication were r and omised to either an upper body strength training programme ( UBST ) , a dynamic ( walking , cycling , circuit ) conventional exercise rehabilitation programme ( CER ) , or advice to ' walk as much as possible at home ' ( CONT ) . Before and after intervention groups performed a st and ard grade d treadmill exercise test ( GTET ) and a 6-minute walk test ( SMWT ) to determine peak physiological parameters and walking distances . Maximal walking distance ( MWD ) , pain-free walking distance ( PFWD ) , peak oxygen uptake ( VO2 ) , heart rate and perceived pain were measured . RESULTS MWD on the GTET increased significantly in the CER group compared with the CONT and UBST groups ( 93.9 + /- 79 % v. 7.0 + /- 19.8 % v. 7.3 + /- 46 % ; CER v. UBST v. CONT p = 0.003 ) . Similarly , peak VO2 increased with CER compared with the CONT and UBST groups ( 28.4 + /- 20 v. -6.2 + /- 15 v. -1.0 + /- 21 % ; CER v. UBST v. CONT p = 0.004 ) . During the SMWT the CER and UBST groups improved in PFWD compared with the CONT group ( 37 + /- 47 % v. 27 + /- 71 % v. -30 + /- 29 % ; CER v. UBST v. CONT p = 0.03 ) , and perceived pain decreased in the CER group compared with the UBST group ( -24 + /- 39 % v. 27 + /- 48 % ; CER v. UBST p = 0.01 ) . CONCLUSION CER improves physiological parameters and walking distances more than UBST does . CER is effective within 6 weeks . Verbal encouragement to exercise is an ineffective form of management
The HBET group did not show improvement in MWD/T compared with the WA group ( SMD 0.30 , 95 % CI -0.45 to 1.05 ; P = 0.43 ; moderate- quality evidence ) .Compared with HBET , SET was more beneficial for PFWD/T but had no effect on quality of life parameters nor on self-reported functional impairment .
Compared with WA , SET was more beneficial for PFWD/T and self-reported functional impairment , as well as for some quality of life parameters ( e.g. , physical functioning , pain , and physical component summary after 12 months ) , and HBET had no effect .
Data show no obvious effects on mortality rates .
Evidence of moderate and high quality shows that SET provides an important benefit for treadmill-measured walking distance ( MWD and PFWD ) compared with HBET and WA , respectively .
Although its clinical relevance has not been definitively demonstrated , this benefit translates to increased MWD of 120 and 210 meters after three months in SET groups .
These increased walking distances are likely to have a positive impact on the lives of patients with IC .
Data provide no clear evidence of a difference between HBET and WA .
Trials show no clear differences in quality of life parameters nor in self-reported functional impairment between SET and HBET .
BACKGROUND Although supervised exercise therapy ( SET ) provides significant symptomatic benefit for patients with intermittent claudication ( IC ) , it remains an underutilized tool .
Widespread implementation of SET is restricted by lack of facilities and funding .
Structured home-based exercise therapy ( HBET ) with an observation component ( e.g. , exercise logbooks , pedometers ) and just walking advice ( WA ) are alternatives to SET .
This is the second up date of a review first published in 2006 .
OBJECTIVES The primary objective was to provide an accurate overview of studies evaluating effects of SET programs , HBET programs , and WA on maximal treadmill walking distance or time ( MWD/T ) for patients with IC .
Secondary objectives were to evaluate effects of SET , HBET , and WA on pain-free treadmill walking distance or time ( PFWD/T ) , quality of life , and self-reported functional impairment .