Operative time and blood loss were significantly reduced in the mini-incision group for studies with the posterior or posterolateral approach .
Concerning postoperative complications , there were no significant differences between the two groups with no significant heterogeneity .
No differences were observed between the two groups for Harris hip score and radiographic results except for cup anterversion .
Although mini-incision appeared to have similar outcomes compared to st and ard incision , the follow-up is short-term according to current st and ards in THA .
Le temps opératoire et les pertes sanguines étaient significativement moins importants dans le groupe mini-incision réalisé par voie postérieure ou postéro-latérale .
Il n'y a pas de différence significative dans les complications postopératoires entre les deux groupes de même en ce qui concerne le score de Harris , les résultats radiologiques exceptés pour l'antéversion de la cupule .
The purpose of this study was to compare the operative outcome between mini and st and ard incisions in total hip arthroplasty ( THA ) .
High- quality studies are required to compare the outcomes of these two procedures .ResuméLe but de cette étude est de comparer le devenir opératoire des patients ayant bénéficié d'une prothèse totale de hanche par voie  mini-invasive ou par incision st and ard .
Mini-incision technique for total hip arthroplasty with navigation.
This prospect i ve study compares a mini-incision technique and traditional posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty ( THA ) . Thirty-three patients who had undergone a mini-incision THA were matched by diagnosis , gender , average age , and preoperative Harris Hip Score ( HHS ) to 33 patients who had undergone THA using the traditional posterior approach .  The average length of the incision for group 1 was 11.7 cm ( range , 7.3 - 13.0 ) and for group 2 was 20.2 cm ( range , 14.8 - 26.0 ) . At the 3-month follow-up , patients in the mini-incision group had significant improvement in limp ( P<.05 ) and ability to climb stairs ( P < .01 ) compared with the traditional group . At the 6 month follow-up , the mini-incision group was significantly better in terms of limp ( P < .05 ) , distance walked ( P<.001 ) , and stairs ( P < 0.001 ) . There was no significant difference between groups for pain , function , or range of motion at the 1-year follow-up examination
Operative time and blood loss were significantly reduced in the mini-incision group for studies with the posterior or posterolateral approach .
Concerning postoperative complications , there were no significant differences between the two groups with no significant heterogeneity .
No differences were observed between the two groups for Harris hip score and radiographic results except for cup anterversion .
Although mini-incision appeared to have similar outcomes compared to st and ard incision , the follow-up is short-term according to current st and ards in THA .
Le temps opératoire et les pertes sanguines étaient significativement moins importants dans le groupe mini-incision réalisé par voie postérieure ou postéro-latérale .
Il n'y a pas de différence significative dans les complications postopératoires entre les deux groupes de même en ce qui concerne le score de Harris , les résultats radiologiques exceptés pour l'antéversion de la cupule .
The purpose of this study was to compare the operative outcome between mini and st and ard incisions in total hip arthroplasty ( THA ) .
High- quality studies are required to compare the outcomes of these two procedures .ResuméLe but de cette étude est de comparer le devenir opératoire des patients ayant bénéficié d'une prothèse totale de hanche par voie  mini-invasive ou par incision st and ard .