Patients experienced significant post-THR improvements in Harris Hip scores , but this did not differ between impact types .
Recipients of cross-linked vs. conventional polyethylene cup liners experienced reduced femoral head penetration and revision .
There was no impact of femoral stem fixation and cup shell design on implant survival rates .
Evidence on mortality and complications ( aseptic loosening , femoral fracture ) was inconclusive .
BACKGROUND Evolvements in the design , fixation methods , size , and bearing surface of implants for  total hip replacement ( THR ) have led to a variety of options for healthcare professionals to consider .
The need to determine the most optimal combinations of THR implant is warranted .
This systematic review evaluated the clinical effectiveness of different types of THR used for the treatment of end stage arthritis of the hip .
A randomized prospective evaluation of outcomes after total hip arthroplasty using cross-linked marathon and non-cross-linked Enduron polyethylene liners.
Cross-linked liners were introduced with the promise that they would substantially reduce polyethylene wear . In 1999 , our institution initiated a prospect i ve study to compare the outcome of total hip arthroplasty patients who were r and omized to non-cross-linked Enduron liners  with that of total hip arthroplasty patients who were r and omized to Marathon polyethylene liners that had been cross-linked with 5 Mrad ( 50 kGy ) of gamma-irradiation and heat-treated to eliminate free radicals . At a mean follow-up of 5.7 years , the clinical outcomes among the Marathon and Enduron liners were similar . However , the mean wear rate was 0.01 + /- 0.07 mm/y for the Marathon group , which represents a 95 % reduction compared with the mean wear rate of 0.19 + /- 0.12 mm/y for the Enduron group . In addition , the incidence of osteolysis was lower in the Marathon group
Patients experienced significant post-THR improvements in Harris Hip scores , but this did not differ between impact types .
Recipients of cross-linked vs. conventional polyethylene cup liners experienced reduced femoral head penetration and revision .
There was no impact of femoral stem fixation and cup shell design on implant survival rates .
Evidence on mortality and complications ( aseptic loosening , femoral fracture ) was inconclusive .
BACKGROUND Evolvements in the design , fixation methods , size , and bearing surface of implants for  total hip replacement ( THR ) have led to a variety of options for healthcare professionals to consider .
The need to determine the most optimal combinations of THR implant is warranted .
This systematic review evaluated the clinical effectiveness of different types of THR used for the treatment of end stage arthritis of the hip .