Catheter ablation of AF  safety and efficacy in DM patients is similar to general population , especially when performed in younger patients with satisfactory glycemic control .
Catheter ablation of AF reduces the amount of patients requiring AADs , an additional benefit in this population commonly exposed to adverse effects of AF pharmacological treatments
AIMS Diabetes mellitus ( DM ) and atrial fibrillation ( AF ) share pathophysiological links , as supported by the high prevalence of AF within DM patients .
Catheter ablation of AF ( AFCA ) is an established therapeutic option for rhythm control in drug resistant symptomatic patients .
Its efficacy and safety among patients with DM is based on small population s , and long-term outcome is unknown .
The present systematic review and meta- analysis aims to assess safety and long-term outcome of AFCA in DM patients , focusing on predictors of recurrence .
Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2: results from a randomized study comparing pulmonary vein isolation versus antiarrhythmic drug therapy.
INTRODUCTION Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) and diabetes mellitus type 2 ( DM2 ) often coexist ; however , a small number of patients with DM2 undergoing catheter ablation ( CA ) of AF  have been included in previous studies . The aim of this study was to evaluate safety and efficacy of ablation therapy in DM2 patients with drug refractory AF . METHODS AND RESULTS From January 2005 to September 2006 , 70 patients with a diagnosis of DM2 and paroxysmal ( n = 29 ) or persistent ( n = 41 ) AF were r and omized to receive either pulmonary vein isolation or a new antiarrhythmic drug treatment ( ADT ) with a 1-year follow-up . The primary endpoint was the time to first AF recurrence . By Kaplan-Meier analysis , at the end of follow-up , 42.9 % of patients in the ADT group and 80 % of patients who received a single ablation procedure and were without medications were free of AF ( P = 0.001 ) . In the ablation group , a significant improvement in quality -of-life ( QoL ) scores as compared with ADT group was observed . Six patients in the ADT group ( 17.1 % ) developed significant adverse drug effects . Hospitalization rate during follow-up was higher in the ADT group ( P = 0.01 ) . The only complication attributable to ablation was one significant access-site hematoma . CONCLUSION In patients with DM2 , CA of AF provides significant clinical benefits over the ADT and appears to be a reasonable approach regarding feasibility , effectiveness , and low procedural risk
Catheter ablation of AF  safety and efficacy in DM patients is similar to general population , especially when performed in younger patients with satisfactory glycemic control .
Catheter ablation of AF reduces the amount of patients requiring AADs , an additional benefit in this population commonly exposed to adverse effects of AF pharmacological treatments
AIMS Diabetes mellitus ( DM ) and atrial fibrillation ( AF ) share pathophysiological links , as supported by the high prevalence of AF within DM patients .
Catheter ablation of AF ( AFCA ) is an established therapeutic option for rhythm control in drug resistant symptomatic patients .
Its efficacy and safety among patients with DM is based on small population s , and long-term outcome is unknown .
The present systematic review and meta- analysis aims to assess safety and long-term outcome of AFCA in DM patients , focusing on predictors of recurrence .