Compared with an energy-restricted SP diet , an isocalorically prescribed HP diet provides modest benefits for reductions in body weight , FM , and triglycerides and for mitigating reductions in FFM and REE
BACKGROUND It is currently unclear whether altering the carbohydrate-to-protein ratio of low-fat , energy-restricted diets augments weight loss and cardiometabolic risk markers .
OBJECTIVE The objective was to conduct a systematic review and meta- analysis of studies that compared energy-restricted , isocaloric , high-protein , low-fat ( HP ) diets with st and ard-protein , low-fat ( SP ) diets on weight loss , body composition , resting energy expenditure ( REE ) , satiety and appetite , and cardiometabolic risk factors .
Effect of an energy-restricted, high-protein, low-fat diet relative to a conventional high-carbohydrate, low-fat diet on weight loss, body composition, nutritional status, and markers of cardiovascular health in obese women.
BACKGROUND Limited evidence suggests that a higher ratio of protein to carbohydrate during weight loss has metabolic advantages . OBJECTIVE The objective was to evaluate the effects of a diet with a high ratio of protein to carbohydrate during weight loss on body composition , cardiovascular disease risk , nutritional status , and markers of bone turnover and renal function in overweight women . DESIGN The subjects were r and omly assigned to 1 of 2 isocaloric 5600-kJ dietary interventions for 12 wk according to a parallel design : a high-protein ( HP ) or a high-carbohydrate ( HC ) diet . RESULTS One hundred women with a mean ( + /-SD ) body mass index ( in kg/m(2 ) ) of 32 + /- 6 and age of 49 + /- 9 y completed the study .  Weight loss was 7.3 + /- 0.3 kg with both diets . Subjects with high serum triacylglycerol ( > 1.5 mmol/L ) lost more fat mass with the HP than with the HC diet ( x + /- SEM : 6.4 + /- 0.7 and 3.4 + /- 0.7 kg , respectively ; P = 0.035 ) and had a greater decrease in triacylglycerol concentrations with the HP ( -0.59 + /- 0.19 mmol/L ) than with the HC ( -0.03 + /- 0.04 mmol/L ) diet ( P = 0.023 for diet x triacylglycerol interaction ) . Triacylglycerol concentrations decreased more with the HP ( 0.30 + /- 0.10 mmol/L ) than with the HC ( 0.10 + /- 0.06 mmol/L ) diet ( P = 0.007 ) . Fasting LDL-cholesterol , HDL-cholesterol , glucose , insulin , free fatty acid , and C-reactive protein concentrations decreased with weight loss . Serum vitamin B-12 increased 9 % with the HP diet and decreased 13 % with the HC diet ( P < 0.0001 between diets ) . Folate and vitamin B-6 increased with both diets ; homocysteine did not change significantly . Bone turnover markers increased 8 - 12 % and calcium excretion decreased by 0.8 mmol/d ( P < 0.01 ) . Creatinine clearance decreased from 82 + /- 3.3 to 75 + /- 3.0 mL/min ( P = 0.002 ) . CONCLUSION An energy-restricted , high-protein , low-fat diet provides nutritional and metabolic benefits that are equal to and sometimes greater than those observed with a high-carbohydrate diet
Compared with an energy-restricted SP diet , an isocalorically prescribed HP diet provides modest benefits for reductions in body weight , FM , and triglycerides and for mitigating reductions in FFM and REE
BACKGROUND It is currently unclear whether altering the carbohydrate-to-protein ratio of low-fat , energy-restricted diets augments weight loss and cardiometabolic risk markers .
OBJECTIVE The objective was to conduct a systematic review and meta- analysis of studies that compared energy-restricted , isocaloric , high-protein , low-fat ( HP ) diets with st and ard-protein , low-fat ( SP ) diets on weight loss , body composition , resting energy expenditure ( REE ) , satiety and appetite , and cardiometabolic risk factors .