More evidence was available for the measurement properties of the FAOS and the FAAM , but overall evidence supporting all measurement properties is not yet sufficient .
Purpose In the foot and ankle literature , a wide range of patient-reported outcome measures ( PROMs ) is used , however , consensus as to which PROMs are preferred is lacking .
Selection of a PROM is among other reasons , often based on measurement properties without considering the method ological quality of the studies that evaluate these measurement properties .
The aim of current study was first to identify the most frequently used foot and ankle-specific PROMs in recent orthopaedic foot and ankle literature , and second to conduct a systematic review to synthesize and critically appraise the measurement properties of these PROMS .
Validation of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score in Adult Acquired Flatfoot Deformity
Introduction : The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ( AOFAS ) Ankle-Hindfoot Score has been under recent scrutiny . The Foot and Ankle Outcome Score ( FAOS ) is an alternative subjective survey , assessing outcomes in 5 subscales . It is vali date d for lateral ankle instability and hallux valgus patients . The aim of our study was to vali date the FAOS for assessing outcomes in flexible adult acquired flatfoot deformity ( AAFD ) . Methods : Patients from the authors ’ institution diagnosed with flexible AAFD from 2006 to 2011 were eligible for the study . In all , 126 patients who completed the FAOS and the Short-Form 12 ( SF-12 ) on the same visit were included in the construct validity component . Correlation was deemed moderate if the Spearman ’s correlation coefficient was .4 to .7 . Content validity was assessed in 63 patients by a question naire that asked patients to rate the relevance of each FAOS question , with a score of 2 or greater considered acceptable . Reliability was measured using intraclass correlation coefficients ( ICCs ) in 41 patients who completed a second FAOS survey . In 49 patients , preoperative and postoperative FAOS scores were compared to determine responsiveness . Results : All of the FAOS subscales demonstrated moderate correlation with 2 physical health related SF-12 domains . Mental health related domains showed poor correlation . Content validity was high for the Quality of Life ( QoL ; mean 2.26 ) and Sports/Recreation subscales ( mean 2.12 ) . All subscales exhibited very good test – retest reliability , with ICCs of .7 and above . Symptoms , QoL , pain , and daily activities ( ADLs ) were responsive to change in postoperative patients ( P < .05 ) . Conclusion : This study has vali date d the FAOS for AAFD with acceptable construct and content validity , reliability , and responsiveness . Given its previous validation for patients with ankle instability and hallux valgus , the additional findings in this study support its use as an alternative to less reliable outcome surveys . Level of Evidence : Level II , prospect i ve comparative study
More evidence was available for the measurement properties of the FAOS and the FAAM , but overall evidence supporting all measurement properties is not yet sufficient .
Purpose In the foot and ankle literature , a wide range of patient-reported outcome measures ( PROMs ) is used , however , consensus as to which PROMs are preferred is lacking .
Selection of a PROM is among other reasons , often based on measurement properties without considering the method ological quality of the studies that evaluate these measurement properties .
The aim of current study was first to identify the most frequently used foot and ankle-specific PROMs in recent orthopaedic foot and ankle literature , and second to conduct a systematic review to synthesize and critically appraise the measurement properties of these PROMS .