We found high quality evidence that hormone therapy in both primary and secondary prevention conferred no protective effects for all-cause mortality , cardiovascular death , non-fatal myocardial infa rct ion , angina , or revascularisation .
There was no strong evidence of effect on risk of stroke in this group .
Our review findings provide strong evidence that treatment with hormone therapy in post-menopausal women overall , for either primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease events has little if any benefit and causes an increase in the risk of stroke and venous thromboembolic events
BACKGROUND Evidence from systematic review s of observational studies suggests that hormone therapy may have beneficial effects in reducing the incidence of cardiovascular disease events in post-menopausal women , however the results of r and omised controlled trials ( RCTs ) have had mixed results .
This is an up date d version of a Cochrane review published in 2013 .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of hormone therapy for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in post-menopausal women , and whether there are differential effects between use in primary or secondary prevention .
Secondary aims were to undertake exploratory analyses to ( i ) assess the impact of time since menopause that treatment was commenced ( ≥ 10 years versus < 10 years ) , and where these data were not available , use age of trial participants at baseline as a proxy ( ≥ 60 years of age versus < 60 years of age ) ; and ( ii ) assess the effects of length of time on treatment .
Coronary Heart Disease in Postmenopausal Recipients of Estrogen Plus Progestin Therapy: Does the Increased Risk Ever Disappear?
BACKGROUND Estrogen plus progestin therapy increases the risk for coronary heart disease ( CHD ) in postmenopausal women . However , this increased risk might be limited to the first years of use and to women who start therapy late in menopause . OBJECTIVE To estimate the effect of continuous estrogen plus progestin therapy on CHD risk over time and stratified by years since menopause . DESIGN Women 's Health Initiative r and omized , double-blinded , placebo-controlled trial . ( Clinical Trials.gov registration number : NCT00000611 ) SETTING 40 U.S. clinical centers . PATIENTS 16 608 postmenopausal women with an intact uterus at baseline from 1993 to 1998 . INTERVENTION Conjugated equine estrogens , 0.625 mg/d , plus medroxyprogesterone acetate , 2.5 mg/d , or placebo . MEASUREMENTS Adherence-adjusted hazard ratios and CHD-free survival curves estimated through inverse probability weighting . RESULTS Compared with no use of hormone therapy , the hazard ratio for continuous use of estrogen plus progestin therapy was 2.36 ( 95 % CI , 1.55 to 3.62 ) for the first 2 years and 1.69 ( CI , 0.98 to 2.89 ) for the first 8 years . For women within 10 years after menopause , the hazard ratios were 1.29 ( CI , 0.52 to 3.18 ) for the first 2 years and 0.64 ( CI , 0.21 to 1.99 ) for the first 8 years , and the CHD-free survival curves for continuous use and no use of estrogen plus progestin crossed at about 6 years ( CI , 2 years to 10 years ) . LIMITATION The analysis may not have fully adjusted for joint determinants of adherence and CHD risk . Sample sizes for some subgroup analyses were small . CONCLUSION No suggestion of a decreased risk for CHD was found within the first 2 years of estrogen plus progestin use , including in women who initiated therapy within 10 years after menopause . A possible cardioprotective effect in these women who initiated therapy closer to menopause became apparent only after 6 years of use . PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE National Heart , Lung , and Blood Institute
We found high quality evidence that hormone therapy in both primary and secondary prevention conferred no protective effects for all-cause mortality , cardiovascular death , non-fatal myocardial infa rct ion , angina , or revascularisation .
There was no strong evidence of effect on risk of stroke in this group .
Our review findings provide strong evidence that treatment with hormone therapy in post-menopausal women overall , for either primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease events has little if any benefit and causes an increase in the risk of stroke and venous thromboembolic events
BACKGROUND Evidence from systematic review s of observational studies suggests that hormone therapy may have beneficial effects in reducing the incidence of cardiovascular disease events in post-menopausal women , however the results of r and omised controlled trials ( RCTs ) have had mixed results .
This is an up date d version of a Cochrane review published in 2013 .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of hormone therapy for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in post-menopausal women , and whether there are differential effects between use in primary or secondary prevention .
Secondary aims were to undertake exploratory analyses to ( i ) assess the impact of time since menopause that treatment was commenced ( ≥ 10 years versus < 10 years ) , and where these data were not available , use age of trial participants at baseline as a proxy ( ≥ 60 years of age versus < 60 years of age ) ; and ( ii ) assess the effects of length of time on treatment .