These studies showed reductions in duration of inpatient stays in the ERAS groups compared with more traditional care as well as reductions in morbidity and mortality rates .
Review ing the data reveals that ERAS protocol s have a role in reducing post-operative morbidity and result in an accelerated recovery following colorectal surgery .
Similarly , both primary and overall hospital stays are reduced significantly .
However , the available evidence suggests that ERAS protocol s do not reduce hospital readmissions or mortality .
INTRODUCTION Colorectal surgery has been associated with a complication rate of 15 - 20 % and mean post-operative inpatient stays of 6 - 11 days .
The principles of enhanced recovery after surgery ( ERAS ) are well established and have been developed to optimise peri-operative care and facilitate discharge .
The purpose of this systematic review is to present an up date d review of peri-operative care in colorectal surgery from the available evidence and ERAS group recommendations .
Implementation of a Fast-Track Perioperative Care Program: What Are the Difficulties?
Background : To evaluate the feasibility of a fast-track ( FT ) program and it ’s effect on postoperative recovery . Methods : All patients , scheduled for elective segmental colorectal resection were treated in a FT program ( FT group ) . Data were compared to a control group operated for elective colorectal resections and treated in a traditional care program ( TC group ) . Data from the FT group were collected prospect ively , data from the TC group retrospectively . Outcome parameters included the number of successfully applied FT modalities , patient satisfaction , morbidity rate , re-operation rate , primary ( PHS ) and total hospital stay ( THS ) , and readmission rate . Results : One-hundred and seven patients were included ( 55 FT group vs. 52 TC group ) . The groups were comparable for patient characteristics such as age and cr-POSSUM score ( p = 0.22 and p = 0.40 ) . An average of 7.4 of 13 predefined FT modalities were successfully achieved per patient . Patient satisfaction was comparable ( p = 0.84 ) . Seven versus 5 patients required a re-operation in the FT and TC groups , respectively ( p = 0.52 ) . Morbidity rate was comparable ( n = 16 vs. 15 , p = 0.83 ) . Median PHS was 4.0 vs. 6.0 days and median THS was 4.0 vs. 6.5 days in the FT and TC groups ( p < 0.01 and p < 0.03 , respectively ) . Six vs. 3 patients were re-admitted in the FT and TC groups , respectively ( p = 0.49 ) . Conclusion : Implementation of all FT modalities was difficult since a rather low number of pre-defined FT modalities was effectively realized . Despite incomplete implementation , PHS and THS were shorter in the FT group without affecting patient satisfaction
These studies showed reductions in duration of inpatient stays in the ERAS groups compared with more traditional care as well as reductions in morbidity and mortality rates .
Review ing the data reveals that ERAS protocol s have a role in reducing post-operative morbidity and result in an accelerated recovery following colorectal surgery .
Similarly , both primary and overall hospital stays are reduced significantly .
However , the available evidence suggests that ERAS protocol s do not reduce hospital readmissions or mortality .
INTRODUCTION Colorectal surgery has been associated with a complication rate of 15 - 20 % and mean post-operative inpatient stays of 6 - 11 days .
The principles of enhanced recovery after surgery ( ERAS ) are well established and have been developed to optimise peri-operative care and facilitate discharge .
The purpose of this systematic review is to present an up date d review of peri-operative care in colorectal surgery from the available evidence and ERAS group recommendations .