The small number of studies included in the present study limited the ability to make inferences when comparing the three models and investigating the strengths and weaknesses of each type of intervention with respect to important outcomes .
Since the outcome of ' reciprocity of social interaction towards others ' could be a dependent variable that might be context -bound to interactions with the child 's parent , we can not conclude the interventions for pre-school children with ASD have significant effects on a generalized skill to engage in reciprocal interactions with others .
However , the outcomes of ' reciprocity of social interaction towards others ' and ' parental synchrony ' may be promising targets for interventions involving pre-school children with ASD .
BACKGROUND There has an increasing number of published trials on psychosocial intervention programmes for pre-school children with autism spectrum disorder ( ASD ) .
To achieve better quality of unbiased evidence for the effectiveness of ASD interventions , it is necessary to conduct a comprehensive review that covers studies with adequate quality st and ards , such as r and omised controlled trials ( RCTs ) , and different types of intervention In this study , we categorize interventions for ASD as behavioural , social-communication focused , and multimodal developmental based on Howlin 's classification of early interventions for children with ASD .
The aim of this study was to compare these three models and investigate the strengths and weaknesses of each type of intervention and to identify the approaches that contribute to a successful outcome for children with autism .
Randomized trial of intensive early intervention for children with pervasive developmental disorder.
Young children with pervasive developmental disorder were r and omly assigned to intensive treatment or parent training . The  intensive treatment group ( 7 with autism , 8 with pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified -- NOS ) averaged 24.52 hours per week of individual treatment for one year , gradually reducing hours over the next 1 to 2 years . The  parent training group ( 7 with autism , 6 with pervasive developmental disorder NOS ) received 3 to 9 months of parent training . The groups appeared similar at intake on all measures ; however , at follow-up the intensive treatment group outperformed the parent training group on measures of intelligence , visual-spatial skills , language , and academics , though not adaptive functioning or behavior problems .  Children with pervasive developmental disorder NOS may have gained more than those with autism
The small number of studies included in the present study limited the ability to make inferences when comparing the three models and investigating the strengths and weaknesses of each type of intervention with respect to important outcomes .
Since the outcome of ' reciprocity of social interaction towards others ' could be a dependent variable that might be context -bound to interactions with the child 's parent , we can not conclude the interventions for pre-school children with ASD have significant effects on a generalized skill to engage in reciprocal interactions with others .
However , the outcomes of ' reciprocity of social interaction towards others ' and ' parental synchrony ' may be promising targets for interventions involving pre-school children with ASD .
BACKGROUND There has an increasing number of published trials on psychosocial intervention programmes for pre-school children with autism spectrum disorder ( ASD ) .
To achieve better quality of unbiased evidence for the effectiveness of ASD interventions , it is necessary to conduct a comprehensive review that covers studies with adequate quality st and ards , such as r and omised controlled trials ( RCTs ) , and different types of intervention In this study , we categorize interventions for ASD as behavioural , social-communication focused , and multimodal developmental based on Howlin 's classification of early interventions for children with ASD .
The aim of this study was to compare these three models and investigate the strengths and weaknesses of each type of intervention and to identify the approaches that contribute to a successful outcome for children with autism .