CONCLUSION There was no evidence to support the use of incentive spirometry in the management of surgical patients .
OBJECTIVE To conduct a systematic review to evaluate the evidence of the use of incentive spirometry ( IS ) for the prevention of postoperative pulmonary complications and for the recovery of pulmonary function in patients undergoing abdominal , cardiac and thoracic surgeries .
Incentive spirometry does not enhance recovery after thoracic surgery
Objective : To investigate the additional effect of incentive spirometry to chest physiotherapy to prevent postoperative pulmonary complications after thoracic surgery for lung and esophageal resections . Design : R and omized controlled trial . Setting : University hospital , intensive care unit , and surgical department . Patients : Sixty‐seven patients ( age , 59 ± 13 yrs ; forced expiratory volume in 1 sec , 93 % ± 22 % predicted ) undergoing elective thoracic surgery for lung ( n = 40 ) or esophagus ( n = 27 ) resection . Interventions : Physiotherapy ( breathing exercises , huffing , and coughing ) ( PT ) plus incentive spirometry ( IS ) was compared with PT alone . Measurements and Main Results : Lung function , body temperature , chest radiograph , white blood cell count , and number of hospital and intensive care unit days were all measured . Pulmonary function was significantly reduced after surgery ( 55 % of the initial value ) and improved significantly in the postoperative period in both groups . However , no differences were observed in the recovery of pulmonary function between the groups . The overall score of the chest radiograph , based on the presence of atelectasis , was similar in both treatment groups . Eight patients ( 12 % ) ( three patients with lobectomy and five with esophagus resection ) developed a pulmonary complication ( abnormal chest radiograph , elevated body temperature and white blood cell count ) , four in each treatment group . Adding IS to regular PT did not reduce hospital or intensive care unit stay . Conclusions : Pulmonary complications after lung and esophagus surgery were relatively low . The addition of IS to PT did not further reduce pulmonary complications or hospital stay . Although we can not rule out beneficial effects in a subgroup of high‐risk patients , routine use of IS after thoracic surgery seems to be ineffective
CONCLUSION There was no evidence to support the use of incentive spirometry in the management of surgical patients .
OBJECTIVE To conduct a systematic review to evaluate the evidence of the use of incentive spirometry ( IS ) for the prevention of postoperative pulmonary complications and for the recovery of pulmonary function in patients undergoing abdominal , cardiac and thoracic surgeries .