This systematic review found robust data demonstrating that engagement in diabetes self-management education results in a statistically significant decrease in A1C levels .
PRACTICE IMPLICATION S The data suggest mode of delivery , hours of engagement , and baseline A1C can affect the likelihood of achieving statistically significant and clinical ly meaningful improvement in A1C
OBJECTIVE Assess effect of diabetes self-management education and support methods , providers , duration , and contact time on glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes .
The effect of a structured behavioral intervention on poorly controlled diabetes: a randomized controlled trial.
BACKGROUND Although maintaining nearly normal glycemia delays onset and slows progression of diabetes complications , many patients with diabetes and their physicians struggle to achieve glycemic targets . The best methods to support patients as they follow diabetes prescriptions and recommendations are unclear . METHODS To test the efficacy of a behavioral diabetes intervention in improving glycemia in long- duration , poorly controlled diabetes , we r and omized 222 adults with diabetes ( 49 % type 1 ) ( mean [ SD ] age , 53 [ 12 ] years ; mean [ SD ] disease duration 18 [ 12 ] years ; mean [ SD ] hemoglobin A(1c ) [ HbA(1c ) ] concentration , 9.0 % [ 1.1 % ] ) to attend ( 1 ) a 5-session manual-based , educator-led structured group intervention with cognitive behavioral strategies ( structured behavioral arm ) ; ( 2 ) an educator-led attention control group education program ( group attention control ) ; or ( 3 ) unlimited individual nurse and dietitian education sessions for 6 months ( individual control ) . Outcomes were baseline and 3- , 6- , and 12-month postintervention HbA(1c ) levels ( primary ) and frequency of diabetes self-care , 3-day pedometer readings , 24-hour diet recalls , average number of glucose checks , physical fitness , depression , coping style , self-efficacy , and quality of life ( secondary ) . RESULTS Linear mixed modeling found that all groups showed improved HbA(1c ) levels ( P < .001 ) . However , the structured behavioral arm showed greater improvements than the group and individual control arms ( 3-month HbA(1c ) concentration changes : -0.8 % vs -0.4 % and -0.4 % , respectively ( P = .04 for group × time interaction ) . Furthermore , participants with type 2 disease showed greater improvement than those with type 1 ( P = .04 for type of diabetes × time interaction ) . Quality of life , glucose monitoring , and frequency of diabetes self-care did not differ by intervention over time . CONCLUSIONS A structured , cognitive behavioral program is more effective than 2 control interventions in improving glycemia in adults with long- duration diabetes . Educators can successfully use modified psychological and behavioral strategies . TRIAL REGISTRATION clinical trials.gov Identifier : NCT000142922
This systematic review found robust data demonstrating that engagement in diabetes self-management education results in a statistically significant decrease in A1C levels .
PRACTICE IMPLICATION S The data suggest mode of delivery , hours of engagement , and baseline A1C can affect the likelihood of achieving statistically significant and clinical ly meaningful improvement in A1C
OBJECTIVE Assess effect of diabetes self-management education and support methods , providers , duration , and contact time on glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes .