In particular , there is little evidence that the identified tools would be good at detecting change in intervention studies .
The obvious gaps in available outcome measurement include well-being and participation outcomes for children , and family quality -of-life outcomes , domains particularly valued by our informants ( young people with ASD and parents ) .
This is the first systematic review of the quality and appropriateness of tools design ed to monitor progress and outcomes of young children with ASD .
BACKGROUND The needs of children with autism spectrum disorder ( ASD ) are complex and this is reflected in the number and diversity of outcomes assessed and measurement tools used to collect evidence about children 's progress .
Relevant outcomes include improvement in core ASD impairments , such as communication , social awareness , sensory sensitivities and repetitiveness ; skills such as social functioning and play ; participation outcomes such as social inclusion ; and parent and family impact .
OBJECTIVES To examine the measurement properties of tools used to measure progress and outcomes in children with ASD up to the age of 6 years .
To identify outcome areas regarded as important by people with ASD and parents .
The Scottish Centre for Autism Preschool Treatment Programme
This article evaluates the effectiveness of a developmentally based early intervention programme .  Two groups of children were compared , a  treatment group and a no-treatment control group .  St and ardized assessment s were administered before and after the intervention period by an independent clinician . Pre-treatment comparisons revealed that the control group had a significantly higher pre-treatment IQ ; but the two groups were comparable for age , mental age , socioeconomic status and number of hours of non-experimental therapy . Results demonstrated that children in the treatment group improved significantly more than those in the control group on measures of joint attention , social interaction , imitation , daily living skills , motor skills and an adaptive behaviour composite . A measure of requesting behaviour fell short of statistical significance . The total stress index reduced for treatment group parents and increased for the control group parents ( but not significantly ) . The results of the study are considered to support the efficacy of this treatment approach
In particular , there is little evidence that the identified tools would be good at detecting change in intervention studies .
The obvious gaps in available outcome measurement include well-being and participation outcomes for children , and family quality -of-life outcomes , domains particularly valued by our informants ( young people with ASD and parents ) .
This is the first systematic review of the quality and appropriateness of tools design ed to monitor progress and outcomes of young children with ASD .
BACKGROUND The needs of children with autism spectrum disorder ( ASD ) are complex and this is reflected in the number and diversity of outcomes assessed and measurement tools used to collect evidence about children 's progress .
Relevant outcomes include improvement in core ASD impairments , such as communication , social awareness , sensory sensitivities and repetitiveness ; skills such as social functioning and play ; participation outcomes such as social inclusion ; and parent and family impact .
OBJECTIVES To examine the measurement properties of tools used to measure progress and outcomes in children with ASD up to the age of 6 years .
To identify outcome areas regarded as important by people with ASD and parents .