Thus , WIs were seldom design ed to improve return-to-work .
Overall , there was low quality evidence that showed no significant differences between WIs and no intervention for pain prevalence or severity .
If present , significant results in favour of WIs were not sustained across follow-up times .
Overall , this review found low quality evidence that neither supported nor refuted the benefits of any specific WI for pain relief and moderate quality evidence that a multiple-component intervention reduced sickness absence in the intermediate-term , which was not sustained over time .
BACKGROUND Musculoskeletal disorders are the most common cause of disability in many industrial countries .
Recurrent and chronic pain accounts for a substantial portion of workers ' absenteeism .
Neck pain seems to be more prominent in the general population than previously known .
OBJECTIVES To determine the effectiveness of workplace interventions ( WIs ) in adult workers with neck pain .
Coordinated and Tailored Work Rehabilitation: A Randomized Controlled Trial with Economic Evaluation Undertaken with Workers on Sick Leave Due to Musculoskeletal Disorders
Introduction In Denmark , the magnitude and impact of work disability on the individual worker and society has prompted the development of a new “ coordinated and tailored work rehabilitation ” ( CTWR ) approach . The aim of this study was to compare the effects of CTWR with conventional case management ( CCM ) on return-to-work of workers on sick leave due to musculoskeletal disorders ( MSDs ) . Methods The study was a r and omized controlled trial with economic evaluation undertaken with workers on sick leave for 4–12 weeks due to MSDs . CTWR consists of a work disability screening by an interdisciplinary team followed by the collaborative development of a RTW plan . The primary outcome variable was registered cumulative sickness absence hours during 12 months follow-up . Secondary outcomes were work status as well as pain intensity and functional disability , measured at baseline , 3 and 12 months follow-up . The economic evaluation ( intervention costs , productivity loss , and health care utilization costs ) was based on administrative data derived from national registries . Results For the time intervals 0–6 months , 6–12 months , and the entire follow-up period , the number of sickness absence hours was significantly lower in the CTWR group as compared to the control group . The total costs saved in CTWR participants compared to controls were estimated at US $ 1,366 per person at 6 months follow-up and US $ 10,666 per person at 12 months follow-up . Conclusions Workers on sick leave for 4–12 weeks due to MSD who underwent “ CTWR ” by an interdisciplinary team had fewer sickness absence hours than controls . The economic evaluation showed that — in terms of productivity loss — CTWR seems to be cost saving for the society
Thus , WIs were seldom design ed to improve return-to-work .
Overall , there was low quality evidence that showed no significant differences between WIs and no intervention for pain prevalence or severity .
If present , significant results in favour of WIs were not sustained across follow-up times .
Overall , this review found low quality evidence that neither supported nor refuted the benefits of any specific WI for pain relief and moderate quality evidence that a multiple-component intervention reduced sickness absence in the intermediate-term , which was not sustained over time .
BACKGROUND Musculoskeletal disorders are the most common cause of disability in many industrial countries .
Recurrent and chronic pain accounts for a substantial portion of workers ' absenteeism .
Neck pain seems to be more prominent in the general population than previously known .
OBJECTIVES To determine the effectiveness of workplace interventions ( WIs ) in adult workers with neck pain .