A metaregression analysis indicated that , after adjusting for possible confounders , studies where fluoxetine was the experimental agent were positively associated with treatment effect , indicating a significant advantage for fluoxetine .
The evidence that the outcome of fluoxetine trials varied according to whether this drug was used as a new compound or a reference one suggests the presence of bias
The present study investigated whether the outcome of r and omized clinical trials study ing fluoxetine favored fluoxetine , where this was the experimental agent , and favored comparator antidepressants in trials where fluoxetine was the reference agent .
Efficacy and safety of tianeptine in the treatment of depressive disorders in comparison with fluoxetine.
BACKGROUND Depression is treated by a great variety of antidepressant treatments . SSRIs ( such as fluoxetine ) are well known : it is , however , sure that further progress is needed and the search for antidepressants with other mechanisms of action ( such as tianeptine ) or different efficacy is still of interest . METHODS A multinational study compared tianeptine with fluoxetine in 387 patients with Depressive Episode , or Recurrent Depressive Disorder , or Bipolar Affective Disorder ( ICD-10 ) , in a double-blind parallel group design . They were treated for six weeks . RESULTS At inclusion , no significant difference between groups was shown . Final MADRS scores were 15.7 and 15.8 with tianeptine and fluoxetine , respectively ( ITT population ) ( p = 0.944 ) . MADRS responders were 58 % and 56 % with tianeptine and fluoxetine , respectively ( p = 0.710 ) . No statistical difference was observed for the other efficacy parameters . Thirty-six withdrawals occurred in each group , without any difference for the reasons of discontinuation . There was no major difference between groups for the other safety parameters . CONCLUSIONS In this study , both tianeptine and fluoxetine exhibited a good efficacy and safety
A metaregression analysis indicated that , after adjusting for possible confounders , studies where fluoxetine was the experimental agent were positively associated with treatment effect , indicating a significant advantage for fluoxetine .
The evidence that the outcome of fluoxetine trials varied according to whether this drug was used as a new compound or a reference one suggests the presence of bias
The present study investigated whether the outcome of r and omized clinical trials study ing fluoxetine favored fluoxetine , where this was the experimental agent , and favored comparator antidepressants in trials where fluoxetine was the reference agent .