In people with non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation , evidence suggests a superiority of RFCA to antiarrhythmic drugs in achieving freedom from atrial arrhythmias , reducing the need for cardioversion , and reducing cardiac-related hospitalisations .
BACKGROUND The optimal rhythm management strategy for people with non-paroxysmal ( persistent or long-st and ing persistent ) atrial fibrilation is currently not well defined .
Antiarrhythmic drugs have been the mainstay of therapy .
But recently , in people who have not responded to antiarrhythmic drugs , the use of ablation ( catheter and surgical ) has emerged as an alternative to maintain sinus rhythm to avoid long-term atrial fibrillation complications .
However , evidence from r and omised trials about the efficacy and safety of ablation in non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation is limited .
OBJECTIVES To determine the efficacy and safety of ablation ( catheter and surgical ) in people with non-paroxysmal ( persistent or long-st and ing persistent ) atrial fibrillation compared to antiarrhythmic drugs .
Randomized comparison of encircling and nonencircling left atrial ablation for chronic atrial fibrillation.
BACKGROUND Left atrial ( LA ) circumferential ablation has been reported to eliminate atrial fibrillation ( AF ) . Whether an ablation without encirclement of the pulmonary veins ( PVs ) is as effective as LA circumferential ablation is not clear . OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of LA circumferential ablation and nonencircling linear ablation in patients with chronic AF . METHODS Eighty patients with chronic AF were r and omized to undergo LA circumferential ablation ( n = 40 ) or nonencircling linear ablation ( n = 40 ) . In LA circumferential ablation , the PVs were encircled , with additional lines made in the mitral isthmus and posterior wall or roof . In nonencircling linear ablation , 4 + /- 1 ablation lines were created through areas of complex electrograms , with lines in the roof ( 38 ) , anterior wall ( 36 ) , septum ( 40 ) , mitral isthmus ( 32 ) , and posterior annulus ( 6 ) . The endpoint of LA circumferential ablation and nonencircling linear ablation was voltage abatement . RESULTS LA flutter occurred in 15 % after LA circumferential ablation and in 18 % after nonencircling linear ablation ( P = .8 ) . A repeat ablation procedure was performed for recurrent AF in 7 and 11 patients or for atrial flutter in 6 and 4 patients after LA circumferential ablation and nonencircling linear ablation , respectively ( P = .8 ) . At 9 + /- 4 months , the prevalence of AF was 28 % in the LA circumferential ablation and 25 % in the nonencircling linear ablation group ( P = .8 ) . Sixty-eight percent and 60 % of patients were in sinus rhythm and free of AF and atrial flutter in the absence of antiarrhythmic drug therapy after LA circumferential ablation and nonencircling linear ablation , respectively ( P = .5 ) . There were no complications . CONCLUSION Nonencircling linear ablation and LA circumferential ablation are equally efficacious in eliminating chronic AF . However , the advantage of nonencircling linear ablation is that it eliminates the need for ablation along the posterior wall of the LA . Therefore , nonencircling linear ablation may avoid the small but real risk of atrioesophageal fistula formation associated with LA circumferential ablation
In people with non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation , evidence suggests a superiority of RFCA to antiarrhythmic drugs in achieving freedom from atrial arrhythmias , reducing the need for cardioversion , and reducing cardiac-related hospitalisations .
BACKGROUND The optimal rhythm management strategy for people with non-paroxysmal ( persistent or long-st and ing persistent ) atrial fibrilation is currently not well defined .
Antiarrhythmic drugs have been the mainstay of therapy .
But recently , in people who have not responded to antiarrhythmic drugs , the use of ablation ( catheter and surgical ) has emerged as an alternative to maintain sinus rhythm to avoid long-term atrial fibrillation complications .
However , evidence from r and omised trials about the efficacy and safety of ablation in non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation is limited .
OBJECTIVES To determine the efficacy and safety of ablation ( catheter and surgical ) in people with non-paroxysmal ( persistent or long-st and ing persistent ) atrial fibrillation compared to antiarrhythmic drugs .