When only trials are considered that include probably blinded ratings or those that are sham-NF or semi-active controlled or those that employed optimally titration procedures , the findings do not support theta/beta NF as a st and alone treatment for children or adolescents with ADHD .
This review concludes that the present role of NF in treating children diagnosed with ADHD should be considered as complementary in a multimodal treatment approach , individualized to the needs of the child , and may be considered a viable alternative to stimulants for a specific group of patients .
This systematic review aim ed to evaluate the efficacy of neurofeedback ( NF ) compared to stimulant medication in treating children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder ( ADHD ) .
A Randomized Controlled Trial Investigating the Effects of Neurofeedback, Methylphenidate, and Physical Activity on Event-Related Potentials in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.
OBJECTIVE Electroencephalographic ( EEG ) neurofeedback ( NF ) is considered a nonpharmacological alternative for medication in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder ( ADHD ) . Comparisons of the behavioral efficacy of NF and medication have produced inconsistent results . EEG measures can provide insight into treatment mechanisms , but have received little consideration . In this r and omized controlled trial ( RCT ) , effects of NF were compared with methylpheni date ( MPH ) , and physical activity ( PA ) in children with ADHD on event-related potential ( ERP ) indices of response inhibition , which are involved in ADHD psychopathology . METHODS Using a multicenter three way parallel group RCT design , 112 children with a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , 4th ed . ( DSM-IV ) ( American Psychiatric Association 1994 ) diagnosis of ADHD , between 7 and 13 years of age , were initially included .  NF training consisted of 30 sessions of theta/beta training at Cz over a 10 week period . PA training was a semiactive control group , matched in frequency and duration . MPH was titrated using a double-blind placebo controlled procedure in 6 weeks , followed by a stable dose for 4 weeks . ERP measures of response inhibition , N2 and P3 , were available for 81 children at pre- and postintervention ( n = 32 NF , n = 25 MPH , n = 24 PA ) . RESULTS Only the medication group showed a specific increase in P3 amplitude compared with NF ( partial eta-squared [ ηp(2 ) ] = 0.121 ) and PA ( ηp(2 ) = 0.283 ) , which was related to improved response inhibition . Source localization of medication effects on P3 amplitude indicated increased activation primarily in thalamic and striatal nuclei . CONCLUSIONS This is the first study that simultaneously compared NF with stimulant treatment and a semiactive control group . Only stimulant treatment demonstrated specific improvements in brain function related to response inhibition . These results are in line with recent doubts on the efficacy and specificity of NF as treatment for ADHD . CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION Train Your Brain ? Exercise and Neurofeedback Intervention for ADHD , https:// clinical trials.gov/show/NCT01363544 , Ref . No. NCT01363544
When only trials are considered that include probably blinded ratings or those that are sham-NF or semi-active controlled or those that employed optimally titration procedures , the findings do not support theta/beta NF as a st and alone treatment for children or adolescents with ADHD .
This review concludes that the present role of NF in treating children diagnosed with ADHD should be considered as complementary in a multimodal treatment approach , individualized to the needs of the child , and may be considered a viable alternative to stimulants for a specific group of patients .
This systematic review aim ed to evaluate the efficacy of neurofeedback ( NF ) compared to stimulant medication in treating children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder ( ADHD ) .