Naftopidil appears to have similar effects in the urological symptom scores and QoL compared to tamsulosin and silodosin .
Naftopidil has similar sexual adverse events compared to tamsulosin but has fewer compared to silodosin
BACKGROUND Benign prostatic hyperplasia ( BPH ) is a common condition in ageing men that may cause lower urinary tract symptoms ( LUTS ) .
Treatment aims are to relieve symptoms and prevent disease-related complications .
Naftopidil is an alpha-blocker ( AB ) that has a high affinity for the A1d receptor that may have advantages in treating LUTS in this setting .
This is an up date of a Cochrane Review first published in 2009 .
Since that time , several large r and omised controlled trials ( RCTs ) have been reported , making this up date relevant .
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effects of naftopidil for the treatment of LUTS associated with BPH .
Silodosin versus naftopidil for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a multicenter randomized trial.
This was a multicenter r and omized trial to investigate the clinical efficacy and the impact on sexual function of alpha-1A selective silodosin and alpha-1D selective naftopidil for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia . A total of 97 patients with lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia who had an International Prostate Symptom Score of 8 or more were r and omly assigned to receive silodosin ( 8 mg/day , n = 53 ) or naftopidil ( 75 mg/day , n = 44 ) . Before and 4 , 8 and 12 weeks after treatment , International Prostate Symptom Score and its quality of life score were used to assess lower urinary tract symptoms . Also , International Index of Erectile Function-5 , and an original question naire were used to evaluate erectile function and ejaculation for sexually active patients , respectively . The silodosin group showed advantages in terms of voiding symptoms and quality of life of International Prostate Symptom Score when compared with the naftopidil group . Both silodosin and naftopidil showed no significant effect on International Index of Erectile Function-5 . A total of 23 sexually active patients in the silodosin group experienced more ejaculatory impairment than 21 patients in the naftopidil group , with a decrease of ejaculation volume ( 87 % vs 40 % , P = 0.003 ) , prolonged time to ejaculation ( 56 % vs 33 % , P = 0.027 ) and decrease of orgasm ( 50 % vs 39 % , P = 0.027 ) . These results suggest that alpha-1A selective blockers are more effective for voiding symptoms , whereas alpha-1D selective blockers offer a minor degree of ejaculatory dysfunction
Naftopidil appears to have similar effects in the urological symptom scores and QoL compared to tamsulosin and silodosin .
Naftopidil has similar sexual adverse events compared to tamsulosin but has fewer compared to silodosin
BACKGROUND Benign prostatic hyperplasia ( BPH ) is a common condition in ageing men that may cause lower urinary tract symptoms ( LUTS ) .
Treatment aims are to relieve symptoms and prevent disease-related complications .
Naftopidil is an alpha-blocker ( AB ) that has a high affinity for the A1d receptor that may have advantages in treating LUTS in this setting .
This is an up date of a Cochrane Review first published in 2009 .
Since that time , several large r and omised controlled trials ( RCTs ) have been reported , making this up date relevant .
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effects of naftopidil for the treatment of LUTS associated with BPH .