There is no evidence for a difference in antiepileptic efficacy between phenobarbital and any other compared AED , yet no evidence for absolute efficacy .
No convincing evidence exists for an excess of behavioural adverse effects , over other AEDs , attributable to phenobarbital .
Masked studies of phenobarbital in childhood epilepsy have shown no significant differences in behavioural or cognitive adverse effects compared to other AEDs .
This is in contrast to the excess of such adverse effects reported in studies open to observer bias .
However , the one finding of reduction in cognitive ability associated with phenobarbital treatment for febrile convulsions remains a concern .
INTRODUCTION : Against a background of concern about the safety of new pharmaceutical products , there has been renewed interest in one of the oldest antiepileptic drugs ( AEDs ) , phenobarbital .
Although still in widespread use in developing countries , its popularity has slipped in Western countries over the past century , partly because of controversy about its adverse effect profile .
This critical review examines the evidence supporting its effectiveness and its associated behavioural adverse effects for febrile convulsions and childhood epilepsy .
Randomised controlled trial to assess acceptability of phenobarbital for childhood epilepsy in rural India
BACKGROUND The use of phenobarbital for childhood epilepsy is controversial because of reported behavioural side-effects ; however , whether this research can validly be extrapolated to developing countries is not clear . We undertook a r and omised comparison of phenobarbital and phenytoin to assess the acceptability and efficacy of phenobarbital as monotherapy for childhood epilepsy in rural India . METHODS Between August , 1995 , and February , 1996 , 109 unselected children aged 2 - 18 years with partial and generalised tonic-clonic epilepsy were identified by population screening . 15 families declined to take part . 94 children were r and omly allocated treatment with phenobarbital ( 1.5 mg/kg daily for 2 weeks ; maintenance dose 3.0 mg/kg daily ; n = 47 ) or phenytoin ( 2.5 mg/kg daily then 5.0 mg/kg daily ; n = 47 ) . Children were followed up for 12 months . The primary outcome measure was the frequency of behavioural side-effects ; behaviour was assessed by the Conners parent rating scale for children aged 6 years and older , and by the preschool behaviour screening question naire ( BSQ ) for those aged 2 - 5 years , at 12 months or at withdrawal from treatment . Analysis was by intention to treat . FINDINGS The mean log-transformed scores on the behaviour rating scales did not differ significantly between the phenobarbital and phenytoin groups ( Conners 2.64 [ SD 0.71 ] vs 2.65 [ 0.89 ] , p = 0.97 ; n = 32 in each group : BSQ 2.12 [ 1.31 ] vs 2.18 [ 1.02 ] , p = 0.94 ; n = 4 vs 3 ) . The odds ratio for behavioural problems  ( phenobarbital vs phenytoin ) was 0.51 ( 95 % CI 0.16 - 1.59 ) . There was no excess in parental reports of side-effects for phenobarbital . We found no difference in efficacy between the study drugs ( adjusted hazard ratio for time to first seizure from r and omisation 0.97 [ 0.28 - 3.30 ] ) . INTERPRETATION This evidence supports the acceptability of phenobarbital as a first-line drug for childhood epilepsy in rural setting s in developing countries
There is no evidence for a difference in antiepileptic efficacy between phenobarbital and any other compared AED , yet no evidence for absolute efficacy .
No convincing evidence exists for an excess of behavioural adverse effects , over other AEDs , attributable to phenobarbital .
Masked studies of phenobarbital in childhood epilepsy have shown no significant differences in behavioural or cognitive adverse effects compared to other AEDs .
This is in contrast to the excess of such adverse effects reported in studies open to observer bias .
However , the one finding of reduction in cognitive ability associated with phenobarbital treatment for febrile convulsions remains a concern .
INTRODUCTION : Against a background of concern about the safety of new pharmaceutical products , there has been renewed interest in one of the oldest antiepileptic drugs ( AEDs ) , phenobarbital .
Although still in widespread use in developing countries , its popularity has slipped in Western countries over the past century , partly because of controversy about its adverse effect profile .
This critical review examines the evidence supporting its effectiveness and its associated behavioural adverse effects for febrile convulsions and childhood epilepsy .