RESULTS The global antihypertensive activity of ARB differs from that observed with amlodipine in the sense that the magnitude of the reduction in the BP values does not essentially depend on the initial BP values nor on the dose used .
When only ARB were considered , the drug used was a determinant for systolic BP reduction , whereas for diastolic BP the influence was on the BP reduction and the duration of the antihypertensive activity .
The dose used had a particular influence on the duration of the antihypertensive activity for both systolic and diastolic BP .
CONCLUSION Among the ARB , the influence is on duration more than on the magnitude of BP reduction .
Dose , therefore , is an important factor in the duration of antihypertensive activity
OBJECTIVE To perform a systematic review of the antihypertensive activity of the angiotensin II AT1 receptor antagonists ( ARB ) .
A comparison of the efficacies and duration of action of the angiotensin II receptor blockers telmisartan and amlodipine.
OBJECTIVES : To compare the antihypertensive effects and duration of action of the angiotensin II receptor antagonist , telmisartan , amlodipine , and placebo in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension using both conventional clinic blood pressures and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring ( ABPM ) . METHODS : After a 4-week single-blind , placebo run-in period , qualifying patients were r and omly allocated in double-blind manner to be administered 40 mg telmisartan ( n = 73 ; increased to 80 and 120 mg as necessary for patients whose diastolic blood pressure ( DBP ) remained > 90 mmHg ) ; 5 mg amlodipine ( n = 78 ; titrated to 5 mg and titrated to 10 mg for patients whose DBP remained > 90 mmHg ) ; or placebo ( n = 81 ) . ABPM was performed at the end of the baseline period and again at the end of 12 weeks of double-blind treatment . RESULTS : Telmisartan and amlodipine treatments significantly decreased trough supine systolic blood pressure and DBP ( P < 0.001 , measured conventionally ) to a similar extent ( by 13.1/7.1 and 14.0/7.1 mmHg , respectively , at the end of 12 weeks ' treatment ) compared with placebo . Both drugs also significantly reduced 24 h mean systolic blood pressures and DBP compared with placebo ( P < 0.0001 ) , measured using ABPM , maintaining control of blood pressure throughout the dosing period . Reductions in DBP with telmisartan were greater ( P < 0.05 ) than those with amlodipine during the night-time interval and the last 4 h of the dosing period . Twenty-four-hour mean ABPM DBP < 85 mmHg were observed in 71 % of telmisartan patients and in 55 % of patients administered amlodipine . In addition , heart rates in patients treated with telmisartan were lower than heart rates in those treated with amlodipine during the final 4 h of the dosing period ( P = 0.0003 ) and during the morning interval ( P = 0.005 ) . Generally , both telmisartan and amlodipine were well tolerated , however , drug-related edema occurred significantly more commonly ( P < 0.05 ) among the patients administered amlodipine than it did among patients administered either telmisartan or placebo . CONCLUSIONS : Clinic blood pressure measurements detected no difference between the antihypertensive effects and duration s of action of telmisartan and amlodipine , both agents producing statistically significant reductions compared with placebo . ABPM measurements , however , revealed differences between the efficacies at specific time points within the dosing periods . These findings highlight the potential importance of the use of ABPM for evaluating and comparing efficacies of antihypertensive agents
RESULTS The global antihypertensive activity of ARB differs from that observed with amlodipine in the sense that the magnitude of the reduction in the BP values does not essentially depend on the initial BP values nor on the dose used .
When only ARB were considered , the drug used was a determinant for systolic BP reduction , whereas for diastolic BP the influence was on the BP reduction and the duration of the antihypertensive activity .
The dose used had a particular influence on the duration of the antihypertensive activity for both systolic and diastolic BP .
CONCLUSION Among the ARB , the influence is on duration more than on the magnitude of BP reduction .
Dose , therefore , is an important factor in the duration of antihypertensive activity
OBJECTIVE To perform a systematic review of the antihypertensive activity of the angiotensin II AT1 receptor antagonists ( ARB ) .