No significant difference in pulmonary function was observed between the two groups .
However , 6MWD and VO2 peak were significantly improved after exercise training .
Conclusion Preoperative exercise training may reduce PPCs for lung cancer patients .
Rehabilitation exercise strengthens muscle capacity , but does not improve impaired pulmonary function , which emphasizes the possible mechanism of the protocol design
Objectives This meta- analysis aim ed to demonstrate the impact of preoperative exercise therapy on surgical outcomes in patients with lung cancer and COPD .
Pulmonary function and muscle capacity were investigated to explore their potential links with outcome improvements after exercise .
Preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation before lung cancer resection: results from two randomized studies.
Complete surgical resection is the most effective curative treatment for lung cancer . However , many patients with lung cancer also have severe COPD which increases their risk of postoperative complications and their likelihood of being considered " inoperable . " Preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation ( PR ) has been proposed as an intervention to decrease surgical morbidity but there is no established protocol and no r and omized study has been published to date . We tested two preoperative PR interventions in patients undergoing lung cancer resection and with moderate-severe COPD in a r and omized single blinded design . Outcomes were length of hospital stay and postoperative complications . The first study tested 4 weeks of guideline -based PR vs. usual care : that study proved to be very difficult to recruit as patients and providers were reluctant to delay surgery . Nine patients were r and omized and no differences were found between arms . The second study tested ten preoperative PR sessions using a customized protocol with nonst and ard components ( exercise prescription based on self efficacy , inspiratory muscle training , and the practice of slow breathing ) ( n=10 ) vs. usual care ( n=9 ) . The PR arm had shorter length of hospital stay by 3 days ( p=0.058 ) , fewer prolonged chest tubes ( 11 % vs. 63 % , p=0.03 ) and fewer days needing a chest tube ( 8.8 vs. 4.3 days p=0.04 ) compared to the controlled arm . A ten-session preoperative PR intervention may improve post operative lung reexpansion evidence d by shorter chest tube times and decrease the length of hospital stay , a crude estimator of post operative morbidity and costs . Our results suggest the potential for short term preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation interventions in patients with moderate-severe COPD undergoing curative lung resection . 4 weeks of conventional preoperative PR seems non feasible
No significant difference in pulmonary function was observed between the two groups .
However , 6MWD and VO2 peak were significantly improved after exercise training .
Conclusion Preoperative exercise training may reduce PPCs for lung cancer patients .
Rehabilitation exercise strengthens muscle capacity , but does not improve impaired pulmonary function , which emphasizes the possible mechanism of the protocol design
Objectives This meta- analysis aim ed to demonstrate the impact of preoperative exercise therapy on surgical outcomes in patients with lung cancer and COPD .
Pulmonary function and muscle capacity were investigated to explore their potential links with outcome improvements after exercise .