Although the convergent validity of ImPACT was supported , evidence of discriminant and predictive validity , diagnostic accuracy and responsiveness was inconclusive .
The review found many factors influenced the validity and utility of ImPACT scores .
Background The immediate post concussion assessment and cognitive testing ( ImPACT ) is the most widely used concussion assessment tool .
Despite its popularity , it is unclear if validation studies for the ImPACT test covered all aspects of validity to support its widespread use in research and clinical practice .
Objective The purpose of this report is to review literature surrounding the validity and the utility of the ImPACT test .
Evaluation of Neuropsychological Domain Scores and Postural Stability Following Cerebral Concussion in Sports
Context With increasing knowledge and research about concussion , there have been few objective studies that have used neuropsychological domain scores and postural stability to assess concussion . Objective To evaluate the recovery curve of athletes who incur sport-related concussion from repeated serial testing of neuropsychological and posturography testing . Design A prospect i ve epidemiological model was used for the course of the study . Setting Division I intercollegiate athletics . Participants Athletes participating in football , soccer , basketball , softball , and cheerleading . Main Outcome Measures  Neuropsychological scores and posturography measures  were obtained preseason and serially at day 1 , day 2 , day 3 , and day 10 postconcussion .  Control participants  were tested at the same intervals .  Neuropsychological scores were converted to st and ards score and then into domains of attention , learning , speed of information processing , concentration , memory , and verbal fluency . Analysis of covariance with the baseline test as the covariate was used to analyze the data with univariate post hoc tests performed . Results Significant group differences were found for self reported symptoms ( P = 0.001 ) , speed of information processing ( P = 0.005 ) , mean stability ( P = 0.002 ) , and vestibular function ( P = 0.003 ) between injured and control participants . A group , by day , planned comparison found that speed of information processing and composite balance measures demonstrated significant differences through day 10 postinjury , while symptoms and the vestibular ratio remained significant only through day 3 . Conclusions The concussion recovery curve demonstrated short-term neuropsychological and posturography deficits following injury . A comprehensive approach to concussion management should be used to assess the injury and make return-to-play decisions
Although the convergent validity of ImPACT was supported , evidence of discriminant and predictive validity , diagnostic accuracy and responsiveness was inconclusive .
The review found many factors influenced the validity and utility of ImPACT scores .
Background The immediate post concussion assessment and cognitive testing ( ImPACT ) is the most widely used concussion assessment tool .
Despite its popularity , it is unclear if validation studies for the ImPACT test covered all aspects of validity to support its widespread use in research and clinical practice .
Objective The purpose of this report is to review literature surrounding the validity and the utility of the ImPACT test .