Specific recommendations for implantation of each prosthesis , taking into consideration the presence of pre-existent conduction abnormalities and anatomical factors , may be needed to reduce the risk of PPI
Aims The incidence of new-onset conduction abnormalities requiring permanent pacemaker implantation ( PPI ) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation ( TAVI ) with new-generation prostheses remains debated .
This systematic review analyses the incidence of PPI after TAVI  with new-generation devices and evaluates the electrical , anatomical , and procedural factors associated with PPI .
In addition , the incidence of PPI after  TAVI with early generation prostheses was review ed for comparison .
Ongoing requirement for pacing post-transcatheter aortic valve implantation and surgical aortic valve replacement.
OBJECTIVES Transcatheter aortic valve implantation ( TAVI ) is an established intervention for aortic stenosis . While it is known that the requirement for permanent pacing is higher following CoreValve ( Medtronic , Inc. , Minneapolis , MN , USA ) TAVI than after surgical aortic valve replacement ( SAVR ) , it remains uncertain whether pacing is required in the medium-to-long term . We hypothesized that complete heart block following TAVI is more likely to resolve than that following SAVR . METHODS A retrospective analysis of prospect ively collated data on 528 patients undergoing TAVI or SAVR from May 2008 to December 2010 at a cardiac tertiary referral hospital .  Demographic data , timing and indication for pacing  post-procedure plus follow-up were recorded . Paced patients were compared and analysed by existing initial indication for pacing . RESULTS In total , 31 ( 5.9 % ) patients received a pacemaker , and there were limited differences between not paced and paced patient characteristics by procedure type . Of these , a greater proportion were implanted post-TAVI compared with SAVR ( 17 vs 3.2 % , P<0.001 ) . The mean time to pacemaker follow-up for TAVI and SAVR was 234 and 188 days , P=0.32 , respectively . Fewer patients compared with pacing indication remained in complete heart block at latest follow-up for TAVI ( 76.5 vs 33.3 % , P=0.02 ) and SAVR ( 92.9 vs 58.3 % , P=0.04 ) . Although , there was a trend towards a greater magnitude of TAVI patients regaining atrioventricular nodal conduction , this did not differ significantly from that seen in SAVR patients . CONCLUSIONS In keeping with previous reports , this single-centre experience demonstrates that patients undergoing TAVI  have higher rates of pacemaker implantation than those following SAVR . However , pacing indication in the short-to-medium term may not persist for all paced patients post-TAVI and -SAVR with the suggestion that a significant proportion recover atrioventricular conduction , which tended to be greatest in TAVI paced patients
Specific recommendations for implantation of each prosthesis , taking into consideration the presence of pre-existent conduction abnormalities and anatomical factors , may be needed to reduce the risk of PPI
Aims The incidence of new-onset conduction abnormalities requiring permanent pacemaker implantation ( PPI ) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation ( TAVI ) with new-generation prostheses remains debated .
This systematic review analyses the incidence of PPI after TAVI  with new-generation devices and evaluates the electrical , anatomical , and procedural factors associated with PPI .
In addition , the incidence of PPI after  TAVI with early generation prostheses was review ed for comparison .