EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS The most studied combination therapy for the treatment of male LUTS is the α1-adrenoceptor antagonist/5α-reductase inhibitor combination .
This combination seems to be more efficacious in terms of several outcome variables , in particular in men who have moderate-to-severe LUTS and are at risk of disease progression .
Also in terms of nocturia improvements , this combination is significantly more effective than the monotherapy .
The other often studied combination treatment , in both male and female patients with LUTS , was the combination of antimuscarinics ( in particular solifenacin ) and mirabegron .
This combination seems to be more effective in comparison with the monotherapies with respect to urinary incontinence and urgency urinary incontinence episodes and several other objective and subjective parameters , without relevant increase of adverse events .
The combination of hormone therapy and antimuscarinics in women with LUTS does not seem to be useful .
For the treatment of LUTS in men and women , combination therapy appears to be a promising option to optimize the efficacy of the available drugs for those who do not experience sufficient benefit with monotherapy .
This add-on scenario offers the possibility to have a more tailored approach to the management of LUTS , always seeking the optimal balance between efficacy and tolerability for a given patient .
PATIENT SUMMARY Some combination of drugs may offer advantages over monotherapies for the treatment of voiding and storage complaints in men and women
CONTEXT Several drugs are approved and available for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms ( LUTS ) in men and women .
However , the vast majority of available data , upon which the approval and recommendation in guidelines are based , considered only the role of the monotherapies and did not evaluate possible combination therapies .
OBJECTIVE This systematic review analyzes the efficacy and adverse events of combination therapies for male and female LUTS .
The impact of adding low-dose oral desmopressin therapy to tamsulosin therapy for treatment of nocturia owing to benign prostatic hyperplasia
Abstract Purpose To evaluate the efficacy and safety of adding a low-dose oral desmopressin to tamsulosin therapy for treatment of nocturia in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia ( BPH ) . Methods Eligible patients with BPH and nocturia ≥2/night were r and omly allocated to two treatment groups ; the first of which received 3-month treatment scheme of daily oral dose of tamsulosin OCAS 0.4 mg and desmopressin MELT 60 mcg ( D/T group ) , while the second one received tamsulosin OCAS 0.4 mg only ( T group ) . Patients were followed on monthly basis and changes in the parameters from baseline to 3 months after treatment were assessed on I-PSS/QoL question naire , 7-day voiding diary , urinalysis , serum sodium , abdominal ultrasonography and uroflowmetry . Results A total of 248 patients were included within the study ; 123 patients in the combined D/T group and 125 patients in T group . The frequencies of night voids decreased by 64.3 % in D/T group compared to 44.6 % in T group . The first sleep period , significantly increased from 82.1 to 160.0 min and from 83.2 to 123.8 min in D/T and T group , respectively ; and significant differences between both groups were observed at the end of study ( p < 0.001 ) . I-PSS , QoL score , post-void residual urine volume and Qmax were significantly improved with no statistical difference between both groups . No serious adverse effects were reported in both groups . Conclusion The addition of low-dose oral desmopressin therapy to an α-blocker tamsulosin provides effective treatment for nocturia in patients with LUTS/BPH
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS The most studied combination therapy for the treatment of male LUTS is the α1-adrenoceptor antagonist/5α-reductase inhibitor combination .
This combination seems to be more efficacious in terms of several outcome variables , in particular in men who have moderate-to-severe LUTS and are at risk of disease progression .
Also in terms of nocturia improvements , this combination is significantly more effective than the monotherapy .
The other often studied combination treatment , in both male and female patients with LUTS , was the combination of antimuscarinics ( in particular solifenacin ) and mirabegron .
This combination seems to be more effective in comparison with the monotherapies with respect to urinary incontinence and urgency urinary incontinence episodes and several other objective and subjective parameters , without relevant increase of adverse events .
The combination of hormone therapy and antimuscarinics in women with LUTS does not seem to be useful .
For the treatment of LUTS in men and women , combination therapy appears to be a promising option to optimize the efficacy of the available drugs for those who do not experience sufficient benefit with monotherapy .
This add-on scenario offers the possibility to have a more tailored approach to the management of LUTS , always seeking the optimal balance between efficacy and tolerability for a given patient .
PATIENT SUMMARY Some combination of drugs may offer advantages over monotherapies for the treatment of voiding and storage complaints in men and women
CONTEXT Several drugs are approved and available for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms ( LUTS ) in men and women .
However , the vast majority of available data , upon which the approval and recommendation in guidelines are based , considered only the role of the monotherapies and did not evaluate possible combination therapies .
OBJECTIVE This systematic review analyzes the efficacy and adverse events of combination therapies for male and female LUTS .