The EQ-5D and SF-36 achieved mixed results in the quantitative testing against psychometric criteria .
The qualitative analysis suggests this is because they provide a very limited coverage of themes identified by people with mental health problems .
BACKGROUND Generic preference-based measures of health like the EQ-5D and SF-6D ( ® ) are increasingly being used in economic evaluation and outcome assessment .
However , there are concerns as to whether or not these generic measures are appropriate for use in people with mental health problems .
OBJECTIVES The EQ-5D and SF-36 ( ® ) ( including its derivatives the SF-12 ( ® ) and SF-6D ) were assessed using the psychometric criteria of validity and responsiveness using quantitative and qualitative methods .
Another aim was to estimate mapping functions between the EQ-5D and SF-6D and condition-specific measures , where appropriate .
A randomised controlled trial to compare the cost-effectiveness of tricyclic antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and lofepramine.
OBJECTIVE To determine the relative cost-effectiveness of three classes of antidepressants : tricyclic antidepressants ( TCAs ) , selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors ( SSRIs ) , and the modified TCA lofepramine , as first choice treatments for depression in primary care . DESIGN Open , pragmatic , controlled trial with three r and omised arms and one preference arm . Patients were followed up for 12 months . SETTING UK primary care : 73 practice s in urban and rural areas in Engl and . PARTICIPANTS Patients with a new episode of depressive illness according to GP diagnosis . INTERVENTIONS Patients were r and omised to receive a TCA ( amitriptyline , dothiepin or imipramine ) , an SSRI ( fluoxetine , sertraline or paroxetine ) or lofepramine . Patients or GPs were able to choose an alternative treatment if preferred . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES At baseline the Clinical Interview Schedule , Revised ( CIS-R PROQSY computerised version ) was administered to establish symptom profiles . Outcome measures over the 12-month follow-up included the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale self-rating of depression ( HAD-D ) , CIS-R , EuroQol ( EQ-5D ) for quality of life , Short Form ( SF-36 ) for generic health status , and patient and practice records of use of health and social services . The primary effectiveness outcome was the number of depression-free weeks ( HAD-D less than 8 , with interpolation of intervening values ) and the primary cost outcome total direct NHS costs . Quality -adjusted life-years ( QALYs ) were used as the outcome measure in a secondary analysis . Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves were computed . Estimates were bootstrapped with 5000 replications . RESULTS In total , 327 patients were r and omised . Follow-up rates were 68 % at 3 months and 52 % at 1 year . Linear regression analysis revealed no significant differences between groups in number of depression-free weeks when adjusted for baseline HAD-D. A higher proportion of patients r and omised to TCAs entered the preference arm than those allocated to the other choices . Switching to another class of antidepressant in the first few weeks of treatment occurred significantly more often in the lofepramine arm and less in the preference arm . There were no significant differences between arms in mean cost per depression-free week . For values placed on an additional QALY of over 5000 pounds , treatment with SSRIs was likely to be the most cost-effective strategy .  TCAs were the least likely to be cost-effective as first choice of antidepressant for most values of a depression-free week or QALY respectively , but these differences were relatively modest . CONCLUSIONS When comparing the different treatment options , no significant differences were found in outcomes or costs within the sample , but when outcomes and costs were analysed together , the result ing cost-effectiveness acceptability curves suggested that SSRIs were likely to be the most cost-effective option , although the probability of this did not rise above 0.6 . Choosing lofepramine is likely to lead to a greater proportion of patients switching treatment in the first few weeks . Further research is still needed on the management of depressive illness in primary care . This should address areas such as the optimum severity threshold at which medication should be used ; the feasibility and effectiveness of adopting structured depression management programmes in the UK context ; the importance of factors such as physical co-morbidity and recent life events in GPs ' prescribing decisions ; alternative ways of collecting data ; and the factors that give rise to many patients being reluctant to accept medication and discontinue treatment early
The EQ-5D and SF-36 achieved mixed results in the quantitative testing against psychometric criteria .
The qualitative analysis suggests this is because they provide a very limited coverage of themes identified by people with mental health problems .
BACKGROUND Generic preference-based measures of health like the EQ-5D and SF-6D ( ® ) are increasingly being used in economic evaluation and outcome assessment .
However , there are concerns as to whether or not these generic measures are appropriate for use in people with mental health problems .
OBJECTIVES The EQ-5D and SF-36 ( ® ) ( including its derivatives the SF-12 ( ® ) and SF-6D ) were assessed using the psychometric criteria of validity and responsiveness using quantitative and qualitative methods .
Another aim was to estimate mapping functions between the EQ-5D and SF-6D and condition-specific measures , where appropriate .