The cost of intervention per participant delivered by dietitians was lower than interventions delivered by non-dietitians , although few studies reported costs .
Lifestyle interventions are effective in reducing body weight and glucose-related outcomes .
Dietitian-delivered interventions , compared with those delivered by other personnel , achieved greater weight reduction .
No consistent trend was identified across different delivery channels
BACKGROUND Type 2 diabetes is a significant public health concern .
With the completion of the Diabetes Prevention Program , there has been a proliferation of studies attempting to translate this evidence base into practice .
However , the cost , effectiveness , and cost-effectiveness of these adapted interventions is unknown .
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this systematic review was to conduct a comprehensive meta- analysis to synthesize the effectiveness , cost , and cost-effectiveness of lifestyle diabetes prevention interventions and compare effects by intervention delivery agent ( dietitian vs non-dietitian ) and channel ( in-person vs technology-delivered ) .
A randomized comparative effectiveness trial of using cable television to deliver diabetes prevention programming
Objective To evaluate the use and effectiveness of two “ in-home ” strategies for delivering diabetes prevention programming using cable television . Methods An individually r and omized , two-arm intervention trial including adults with diabetes risk factors living in two US cities . Interventions involved a 16-session lifestyle intervention delivered via “ video-on-dem and ” cable television , offered alone versus in combination with web-based lifestyle support tools . Repeated measures longitudinal linear regression with imputation of missing observations was used to compare changes in body weight . Results A total of 306 individuals were r and omized and offered the interventions . After 5 months , 265 ( 87 % ) participants viewed at least 1 , and 110 ( 36 % ) viewed ≥9 of the video episodes . A total of 262 ( 86 % ) participants completed a 5-month weight measurement . In intention-to-treat analysis with imputation of missing observations , mean weight loss at 5 months for both treatment groups combined was 3.3 % ( 95 % CI 0.7 - 5.0 % ) , regardless of intervention participation ( with no differences between r and omized groups ( P = 0.19 ) ) , and was 4.9 % ( 95 % CI 2.1 - 6.5 % ) for participants who viewed ≥9 episodes . Conclusions In-home delivery of evidence -based diabetes prevention programming in a reality television format , offered with or without online behavioral support tools , can achieve modest weight losses consistent with past implementation studies of face-to-face programs using similar content
The cost of intervention per participant delivered by dietitians was lower than interventions delivered by non-dietitians , although few studies reported costs .
Lifestyle interventions are effective in reducing body weight and glucose-related outcomes .
Dietitian-delivered interventions , compared with those delivered by other personnel , achieved greater weight reduction .
No consistent trend was identified across different delivery channels
BACKGROUND Type 2 diabetes is a significant public health concern .
With the completion of the Diabetes Prevention Program , there has been a proliferation of studies attempting to translate this evidence base into practice .
However , the cost , effectiveness , and cost-effectiveness of these adapted interventions is unknown .
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this systematic review was to conduct a comprehensive meta- analysis to synthesize the effectiveness , cost , and cost-effectiveness of lifestyle diabetes prevention interventions and compare effects by intervention delivery agent ( dietitian vs non-dietitian ) and channel ( in-person vs technology-delivered ) .