In the first systematic review , the patients ' or HCPs ' overall judgment about the likely evolution of LBP was the factor most strongly linked to poor outcome , with predictive validity similar to that of multidimensional scales .
This result may be explained by the implicit aggregation of many prognostic factors underlying this judgment and suggests the relevance of considering the patients from biopsychosocial and longitudinal points of view .
It is unlikely that any intervention focusing on a single factor would ever fit the needs of most patients ; interventions targeting determinants from several fields ( mainly psychosocial , biomechanical , and occupational ) may be more relevant .
Finally , in the third study , the prevalence of psychosocial comorbidity in chronic LBP patients was not found to be significantly higher than in other patients consulting in primary care .
Rather than specifically screening for psychosocial conditions , this suggests taking into account any potential comorbidity in patients with chronic LBP , as in other patients .
As this condition is illustrative of many situations encountered in primary care , the strategies proposed here may benefit most patients consulting in this setting
Non-specific low back pain ( LBP ) affects many people and has major socio-economic consequences .
Traditional therapeutic strategies , mainly focused on biomechanical factors , have had moderate and short-term impact .
Certain psychosocial factors have been linked to poor prognosis of LBP and they are increasingly considered as promising targets for management of LBP .
Primary health care providers ( HCPs ) are involved in most of the management of people with LBP and they are skilled in providing comprehensive care , including consideration of psychosocial dimensions .
This review aims to discuss three pieces of recent research focusing on psychosocial issues in LBP patients in primary care .
Why is a treatment aimed at psychosocial factors not effective in patients with (sub)acute low back pain?
& NA ; Psychosocial factors have been shown to play an important role in the development of chronic low back pain ( LBP ) . In our recently completed cluster‐r and omized trial we found , however , no evidence of an effect of our minimal intervention strategy ( MIS ) aim ed at psychosocial factors , over usual care ( UC ) in patients with (sub)acute LBP . To explore the reasons why , this paper presents an evaluation of the processes presumably underlying the effectiveness of MIS . General practitioner ( GP ) attitude was evaluated by the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale and two additional questions . GP behaviour was evaluated by analysing treatment registration forms and patients ' responses to items regarding treatment content . Patients also scored items on satisfaction and compliance . Modification of psychosocial measures was evaluated by analysing changes after 6 and 52 weeks on the Fear Avoidance and Beliefs Question naire , the Coping Strategies Question naire and the 4‐Dimensional Symptom Question naire . A total of 60 GPs and 314 patients participated in the study . GPs in the MIS‐group adopted a less biomedical orientated attitude than in the UC‐group , but were only moderately successful in identification of psychosocial factors . Treatment contents as perceived by the patient and patient satisfaction differed significantly between both groups . Changes on psychosocial measures , however , did not differ between groups . The suboptimal identification of psychosocial factors in the MIS‐group and the absence of a relevant impact on psychosocial factors may explain why MIS was not more effective than UC
In the first systematic review , the patients ' or HCPs ' overall judgment about the likely evolution of LBP was the factor most strongly linked to poor outcome , with predictive validity similar to that of multidimensional scales .
This result may be explained by the implicit aggregation of many prognostic factors underlying this judgment and suggests the relevance of considering the patients from biopsychosocial and longitudinal points of view .
It is unlikely that any intervention focusing on a single factor would ever fit the needs of most patients ; interventions targeting determinants from several fields ( mainly psychosocial , biomechanical , and occupational ) may be more relevant .
Finally , in the third study , the prevalence of psychosocial comorbidity in chronic LBP patients was not found to be significantly higher than in other patients consulting in primary care .
Rather than specifically screening for psychosocial conditions , this suggests taking into account any potential comorbidity in patients with chronic LBP , as in other patients .
As this condition is illustrative of many situations encountered in primary care , the strategies proposed here may benefit most patients consulting in this setting
Non-specific low back pain ( LBP ) affects many people and has major socio-economic consequences .
Traditional therapeutic strategies , mainly focused on biomechanical factors , have had moderate and short-term impact .
Certain psychosocial factors have been linked to poor prognosis of LBP and they are increasingly considered as promising targets for management of LBP .
Primary health care providers ( HCPs ) are involved in most of the management of people with LBP and they are skilled in providing comprehensive care , including consideration of psychosocial dimensions .
This review aims to discuss three pieces of recent research focusing on psychosocial issues in LBP patients in primary care .