In particular , there is little evidence that the identified tools would be good at detecting change in intervention studies .
The obvious gaps in available outcome measurement include well-being and participation outcomes for children , and family quality -of-life outcomes , domains particularly valued by our informants ( young people with ASD and parents ) .
This is the first systematic review of the quality and appropriateness of tools design ed to monitor progress and outcomes of young children with ASD .
BACKGROUND The needs of children with autism spectrum disorder ( ASD ) are complex and this is reflected in the number and diversity of outcomes assessed and measurement tools used to collect evidence about children 's progress .
Relevant outcomes include improvement in core ASD impairments , such as communication , social awareness , sensory sensitivities and repetitiveness ; skills such as social functioning and play ; participation outcomes such as social inclusion ; and parent and family impact .
OBJECTIVES To examine the measurement properties of tools used to measure progress and outcomes in children with ASD up to the age of 6 years .
To identify outcome areas regarded as important by people with ASD and parents .
Treatment of Children with Autism: A Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate a Caregiver‐Based Intervention Program in Community Day‐Care Centers
& NA ; This study reports on the results of a r and omized controlled trial that evaluated a caregiverbased intervention program for children with autism in community day‐care centers . Thirty‐five preschool children with a DSM III‐R diagnosis of autism or pervasive developmental disorder were r and omized to an experimental or control group . Children in the experimental group were enrolled in day care and their parents and child care workers received a 12‐week intervention consisting of lectures and on‐site consultations to day‐care centers . In addition , supportive work was undertaken with families . Control subjects received day care alone . In the experimental group , there were greater gains in language abilities , significant increases in caregivers ' knowledge about autism , greater perception of control on the part of mothers , and greater parent satisfaction . We conclude that this research design demonstrated that the intervention was significantly superior to day care alone
In particular , there is little evidence that the identified tools would be good at detecting change in intervention studies .
The obvious gaps in available outcome measurement include well-being and participation outcomes for children , and family quality -of-life outcomes , domains particularly valued by our informants ( young people with ASD and parents ) .
This is the first systematic review of the quality and appropriateness of tools design ed to monitor progress and outcomes of young children with ASD .
BACKGROUND The needs of children with autism spectrum disorder ( ASD ) are complex and this is reflected in the number and diversity of outcomes assessed and measurement tools used to collect evidence about children 's progress .
Relevant outcomes include improvement in core ASD impairments , such as communication , social awareness , sensory sensitivities and repetitiveness ; skills such as social functioning and play ; participation outcomes such as social inclusion ; and parent and family impact .
OBJECTIVES To examine the measurement properties of tools used to measure progress and outcomes in children with ASD up to the age of 6 years .
To identify outcome areas regarded as important by people with ASD and parents .