The QT autograft detected comparable rate of Lachman test > 3 mm , Pivot shift test > 3 m and instrumental laxity > 3 mm .
The QT autograft showed a lower rate of autograft failure above all .
The QT autograft detected the reduced rate of AKP than the PT .
Quadriceps tendon autograft may represent a feasible option for primary ACL reconstruction .
The purpose of the current study was to clarify the role of the quadriceps tendon ( QT ) autograft for primary ACL reconstruction .
Thus , a Bayesian network meta- analysis comparing patients undergoing a primary ACL reconstruction with QT versus patellar tendon ( PT ) and hamstring tendon ( HT ) autografts  was conducted .
A 10-year comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with hamstring tendon and patellar tendon autograft: a controlled, prospective trial.
BACKGROUND There are no controlled , prospect i ve studies comparing the 10-year outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament ( ACL ) reconstruction using patellar tendon ( PT ) and 4-str and hamstring tendon ( HT ) autografts . HYPOTHESIS Comparable results are possible with HT and PT autografts . STUDY DESIGN Cohort study ; Level of evidence , 2 . METHODS One hundred eighty ACL-deficient knees that met inclusion criteria underwent ACL reconstruction ( 90 HT autograft , 90 PT autograft ) by one surgeon and were treated with an accelerated rehabilitation program . All knees were observed in a prospect i ve fashion with subjective , objective , and radiographic evaluation at 2 , 5 , 7 , and 10-year intervals . RESULTS At 10 years , there were no differences in graft rupture rates ( 7/90 PT vs. 12/90 HT , P = .24 ) . There were 20 contralateral ACL ruptures in the PT group , compared with 9 in the HT group ( P = .02 ) . In all patients , graft rupture was associated with instrumented laxity > 2 mm at 2 years ( P = .001 ) . Normal or near-normal function of the knee was reported in 97 % of patients in both groups . In the PT group , harvest-site symptoms ( P = .001 ) and kneeling pain ( P = .01 ) were more common than in the HT group . More patients reported pain with strenuous activities in PT knees than in HT knees ( P = .05 ) . Radiographic osteoarthritis was more common in PT knees than the HT-reconstructed knees ( P = .04 ) . The difference , however , was composed of patients with mild osteoarthritis . Other predictors of radiographic osteoarthritis were < 90 % single-legged hop test at 1 year and the need for further knee surgery . An " ideal " outcome , defined as an overall International Knee Documentation Committee grade of A or B and a radiographic grade of A at 10 years after ACL reconstruction , was associated with <3 mm of instrumented laxity at 2 years , the absence of additional surgery in the knee , and HT grafts . CONCLUSIONS It is possible to obtain excellent results with both HT and PT autografts . We recommend HT reconstructions to our patients because of decreased harvest-site symptoms and radiographic osteoarthritis
The QT autograft detected comparable rate of Lachman test > 3 mm , Pivot shift test > 3 m and instrumental laxity > 3 mm .
The QT autograft showed a lower rate of autograft failure above all .
The QT autograft detected the reduced rate of AKP than the PT .
Quadriceps tendon autograft may represent a feasible option for primary ACL reconstruction .
The purpose of the current study was to clarify the role of the quadriceps tendon ( QT ) autograft for primary ACL reconstruction .
Thus , a Bayesian network meta- analysis comparing patients undergoing a primary ACL reconstruction with QT versus patellar tendon ( PT ) and hamstring tendon ( HT ) autografts  was conducted .