For common outcomes there was similar efficacy between PDE-5 inhibitors
Background There are no r and omised and properly blinded trials directly comparing one PDE-5 inhibitor with another in a normal home setting .
Valid indirect comparisons with a common comparator must examine equivalent doses , similar duration , similar population s , with the same outcomes reported in the same way .
Asian sildenafil efficacy and safety study (ASSESS-1): a double-blind, placebo-controlled, flexible-dose study of oral sildenafil in Malaysian, Singaporean, and Filipino men with erectile dysfunction. The Assess-1 Study Group.
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the efficacy , safety , and tolerability of oral sildenafil in Asian men with erectile dysfunction of various causes ( organic , psychogenic , or mixed ) and of more than 6 months ' duration . METHODS In this double-blind , parallel-group trial conducted at eight centers in Malaysia , the Philippines , and Singapore , 254 men , 26 to 78 years old , were r and omized to 12 weeks of sildenafil or placebo taken as needed 1 hour before anticipated sexual activity . Initially , the sildenafil ( n = 127 ) or matching placebo ( n = 127 ) dose was 50 mg but could be increased to 100 mg or decreased to 25 mg because of a lack of efficacy or intolerance , respectively . Efficacy was assessed by the 15- question International Index of Erectile Function , patients ' event logs of sexual activity , and a global efficacy question about erections . RESULTS The two primary efficacy variables relating to achievement and maintenance of an erection sufficient for sexual intercourse , as assessed by the mean scores for International Index of Erectile Function question 3 ( 4.22 versus 2.59 ) and question 4 ( 4.15 versus 2.41 ) , were both significantly higher with sildenafil than with placebo ( P < 0.0001 ) . In addition , the five separate International Index of Erectile Function domains of sexual function , the percentage of successful intercourse attempts , and the global efficacy assessment of erections revealed significantly greater treatment effects in favor of sildenafil ( P < 0.0001 versus placebo for all variables ) . Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 22.8 % of patients who received sildenafil and in 10.2 % of those who received placebo . CONCLUSIONS Sildenafil is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for Asian men with erectile dysfunction of broad-spectrum etiology
For common outcomes there was similar efficacy between PDE-5 inhibitors
Background There are no r and omised and properly blinded trials directly comparing one PDE-5 inhibitor with another in a normal home setting .
Valid indirect comparisons with a common comparator must examine equivalent doses , similar duration , similar population s , with the same outcomes reported in the same way .