Treatment with SSRIs rather than placebo was associated with clinical improvement by the end of the first week of use .
CONCLUSIONS Treatment with SSRIs is associated with symptomatic improvement in depression by the end of the first week of use , and the improvement continues at a decreasing rate for at least 6 weeks
CONTEXT Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors ( SSRIs ) are often described as having a delayed onset of effect in the treatment of depression .
However , some trials have reported clinical improvement as early as the first week of treatment .
OBJECTIVE To test the alternative hypotheses of delayed vs early onset of antidepressant action with SSRIs in patients with unipolar depression .
Effectiveness of low doses of paroxetine controlled release in the treatment of major depressive disorder.
CONTEXT Paroxetine controlled release ( CR ) is approved for the treatment of major depressive disorder ( MDD ) in the dosage range of 25 to 62.5 mg daily . However , lower daily doses ( 12.5 mg and 25 mg ) of this formulation have not been investigated in the treatment of MDD . If the 12.5-mg and 25-mg doses are found to be efficacious , these lower doses may well convey a superior tolerability profile for paroxetine CR in the treatment of MDD . OBJECTIVE To evaluate the antidepressant efficacy and tolerability profile of daily doses of paroxetine CR 12.5 mg and 25 mg versus placebo in the treatment of MDD . DESIGN AND SETTING R and omized , double-blind , placebo-controlled clinical trial conducted in 40 clinical investigation centers in the United States . PARTICIPANTS 447 adult ( > or = 18 years of age ) out patients who met DSM-IV criteria for MDD and with a baseline 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression ( HAM-D ) score of at least 20 comprised the intent-to-treat study population ( mean age = 38.8 years ; 58.4 % female ; 75.6 % white ) . INTERVENTION Eligible patients completing a 1-week single-blind placebo run-in period were r and omly assigned to receive once-a-day study medication ( paroxetine CR 12.5 mg [ N = 156 ] , paroxetine CR 25 mg [ N = 154 ] , or placebo [ N = 149 ] ) in an 8-week , double-blind , parallel cell comparison . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary efficacy measure was the change from baseline to study endpoint ( week 8) as measured by the HAM-D. Secondary efficacy measures included change from baseline to study endpoint as assessed by both the depressed mood item on the HAM-D and the Clinical Global Impressions ( CGI ) Severity of Illness scale ( CGI-S ) . The proportion of patients considered at study endpoint to be in response ( CGI-Improvement score of 1 or 2 ) or in remission ( HAM-D < or = 7 ) in the 3 treatment groups was also compared . Quality of life was assessed by the change from baseline in total score of the short form of the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Question naire ( Q-LES-Q ) . Safety observations were made by assessing the proportion of patients who had adverse experiences , including laboratory and electrocardiographic abnormalities , during the treatment period . RESULTS The primary efficacy analysis revealed that both the 12.5-mg and the 25-mg paroxetine CR treatment groups were associated with significant therapeutic effects ( change in HAM-D score ) from baseline to study endpoint ( LOCF : p = .038 , 95 % CI = -3.38 to -0.09 and p = .005 , 95 % CI = -4.06 to -0.74 , respectively ) . Results from the Wilcoxon rank sum test of the depressed mood item of the HAM-D ( p = .011 , 95 % CI = -0.57 to -0.07 ) demonstrated significant efficacy in the 25-mg treatment group but not in the 12.5-mg group . However , LOCF analysis of the CGI-S revealed significant therapeutic effects for both the 12.5-mg ( p = .018 , 95 % CI = -0.61 to -0.06 ) and 25-mg ( p < .001 , 95 % CI = -0.78 to -0.22 ) treatment groups . Significantly more patients in the 25-mg paroxetine CR-treated group than in the placebo-treated group met criteria for response ( CGI-Improvement score of 1 or 2 , p = .035 , OR = 1.68 , 95 % CI = 1.04 to 2.73 ) as well as for remission ( HAM-D score < /= 7 , p = .013 , OR = 1.96 , 95 % CI = 1.15 to 3.33 ) . Neither HAM-D remission analysis nor CGI responder analysis showed statistical separation from placebo for paroxetine CR 12.5-mg treatment . Quality of life improvements were statistically significant for the 25-mg treatment ( p = .041 , 95 % CI = 0.17 to 8.03 ) on the Q-LES-Q total score . Post hoc LOCF analyses of HAM-D sleep disturbance , psychic anxiety , and anxiety/somatization factors revealed significant improvements from baseline in the paroxetine CR 25-mg and 12.5-mg treatment groups . The types of adverse events reported in the 12.5-mg and 25-mg groups were similar to those reported with paroxetine CR at the customary 25-mg to 62.5-mg range ; however , the lower doses of paroxetine CR were associated with a relatively reduced incident rate of these adverse events and an overall improved tolerability compared with the incident rate and tolerability profile associated with the customary dose range of paroxetine CR ( 25 to 62.5 mg ) . CONCLUSION Paroxetine CR , at 12.5 mg/day and 25 mg/day , demonstrated significant antidepressant effects
Treatment with SSRIs rather than placebo was associated with clinical improvement by the end of the first week of use .
CONCLUSIONS Treatment with SSRIs is associated with symptomatic improvement in depression by the end of the first week of use , and the improvement continues at a decreasing rate for at least 6 weeks
CONTEXT Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors ( SSRIs ) are often described as having a delayed onset of effect in the treatment of depression .
However , some trials have reported clinical improvement as early as the first week of treatment .
OBJECTIVE To test the alternative hypotheses of delayed vs early onset of antidepressant action with SSRIs in patients with unipolar depression .