Less frequently reported were quality of life , patient satisfaction , self-care , and healthcare utilization .
Most care management modalities were carved out from primary care .
Conclusions Most care management programs for patients with type 2 diabetes are ' carved-out ' , accomplish limited effects on metabolic outcomes , and have unknown effects on patient important outcomes .
Background This systematic review and meta- analysis aims at assessing the composition and performance of care management models evaluated in the last decade and their impact on patient important outcomes .
Improving diabetes processes of care in managed care.
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the impact of systematic patient evaluation and patient and provider feedback on the processes and intermediate outcomes of diabetes care in Independent Practice Association model internal medicine practice s. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Nine practice s providing care to managed care patients were r and omly assigned as intervention or comparison sites . Intervention-site subjects had Annual Diabetes Assessment Program ( ADAP ) assessment s ( HbA(1c  ) , blood pressure , lipids , smoking , retinal photos , urine microalbumin , and foot examination ) at years 1 and 2 . Comparison-site subjects had ADAP assessment s at year 2 . At Intervention sites , year 1 ADAP results were review ed with subjects , mailed to providers , and incorporated into electronic medical records with guideline -generated suggestions for treatment and follow-up . Medical records were evaluated for both groups for the year before both the year 1 and year 2 ADAP assessment s. Processes and intermediate outcomes were compared using linear and logistic mixed hierarchical models . RESULTS Of 284 eligible subjects , 103 of 173 ( 60 % ) at the Intervention sites and 71 of 111 ( 64 % ) at the comparison sites participated ; 83 of 103 ( 81 % ) of the intervention-site subjects returned for follow-up at year 2 . Performance of the six recommended assessment s improved in intervention-site subjects at year 2 compared with year 1 ( 5.8 vs. 4.3 , P = 0.0001 ) and compared with comparison-site subjects at year 2 ( 4.2 , P = 0.014 ) . No significant changes were noted in intermediate outcomes . CONCLUSIONS The ADAP significantly improved processes of care but not intermediate outcomes . Additional interventions are needed to improve intermediate outcomes
Less frequently reported were quality of life , patient satisfaction , self-care , and healthcare utilization .
Most care management modalities were carved out from primary care .
Conclusions Most care management programs for patients with type 2 diabetes are ' carved-out ' , accomplish limited effects on metabolic outcomes , and have unknown effects on patient important outcomes .
Background This systematic review and meta- analysis aims at assessing the composition and performance of care management models evaluated in the last decade and their impact on patient important outcomes .