Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
Effects of an exercise and hypocaloric healthy eating program on biomarkers associated with long-term prognosis after early-stage breast cancer: a randomized controlled trial
Excess body weight at diagnosis and weight gain after breast cancer are associated with poorer long-term prognosis . This study investigated the effects of a lifestyle intervention on body weight and other health outcomes influencing long-term prognosis in overweight women ( BMI > 25.0 kg/m2 ) recovering from early-stage ( stage I – III ) breast cancer . A total of 90 women treated 3–18 months previously were r and omly allocated to a 6-month exercise and hypocaloric healthy eating program ( n = 47 , aged 55.6 ± 10.2 year ) or  control group ( n = 43 , aged 55.9 ± 8.9 year ) . Women in the intervention group received three supervised exercise sessions per week and individualized dietary advice , supplemented by weekly nutrition seminars . Body weight , waist circumference , waist/hip ratio [ WHR ] , cardiorespiratory fitness , blood biomarkers associated with breast cancer recurrence and cardiovascular disease risk , and quality of life ( FACT-B ) were assessed at baseline and 6 months . Three-day diet diaries were used to assess macronutrient and energy intakes . A moderate reduction in body weight in the intervention group ( median difference from baseline of −1.09 kg ; IQR −0.15 to −2.90 kg ; p = 0.07 ) was accompanied by significant reductions in waist circumference ( p < 0.001 ) , WHR ( p = 0.005 ) , total ( p = 0.021 ) and saturated fat ( p = 0.006 ) intakes , leptin ( p = 0.005 ) , total cholesterol ( p = 0.046 ) , and resting diastolic blood pressure ( p = 0.03 ) . Cardiopulmonary fitness ( p < 0.001 ) and FACT-B quality of life ( p = 0.004 ) also showed significant improvements in the intervention group . These findings suggest that an individualized exercise and a hypocaloric healthy eating program can positively impact upon health outcomes influencing long-term prognosis in overweight women recovering from early-stage breast cancer
Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?