However , for the ultra-mild All-Bond Universal adhesive , the etch- and -rinse strategy was significantly different than the self-etch mode in terms of dentin micro-tensile bond strength , as well as in the global analysis of enamel micro-tensile and micro-shear bond strength ( p≤0.05 ) .
The enamel bond strength of universal adhesives is improved with prior phosphoric acid etching .
However , this effect was not evident for dentin with the use of mild universal adhesives with the etch- and -rinse strategy .
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE Selective enamel etching prior to the application of a mild universal adhesive is an advisable strategy for optimizing bonding
OBJECTIVES A systematic review was conducted to determine whether the etch- and -rinse or self-etching mode is the best protocol for dentin and enamel adhesion by universal adhesives .
A new universal simplified adhesive: 18-month clinical evaluation.
PURPOSE To evaluate the 18-month clinical performance of a multimode adhesive ( Scotchbond Universal Adhesive , SU , 3 M ESPE , St Paul , MN , USA ) in noncarious cervical lesions ( NCCLs ) using two evaluation criteria . MATERIAL S AND METHODS Thirty-nine patients participated in this study . Two-hundred restorations were assigned to four groups : ERm , etch- and -rinse + moist dentin ; ERd , etch- and -rinse + dry dentin ; Set , selective enamel etching ; and SE , self-etch . The composite resin , Filtek Supreme Ultra ( 3 M ESPE ) , was placed incrementally . The restorations were evaluated at baseline , and at 18 months , using both the World Dental Federation ( FDI ) and the United States Public Health Service ( USPHS ) criteria . Statistical analyses were performed using Friedman repeated- measures analysis of variance by rank and McNemar test for significance in each pair ( α=0.05 ) . RESULTS Five restorations ( SE : 3 ; Set : 1 ; and ERm : 1 ) were lost after 18 months ( p>0.05 for either criteria ) . Marginal staining occurred in four and 10 % of the restorations evaluated ( p>0.05 ) , respectively , for USPHS and FDI criteria . Nine restorations were scored as bravo for marginal adaptation using the USPHS criteria and 38 % , 40 % , 36 % , and 44 % for groups ERm , ERd , Set , and SE , respectively , when the FDI criteria were applied ( p>0.05 ) . However , when semiquantitative scores ( or SQUACE ) for marginal adaptation were used , SE result ed in a significantly greater number of restorations , with more than 30 % of the total length of the interface showing marginal discrepancy ( 28 % ) in comparison with the other groups ( 8 % , 6 % , and 8 % , respectively , for ERm , ERd , and Set ) . CONCLUSIONS The clinical retention of the multimode adhesive at 18 months does not depend on the bonding strategy . The only differences between strategies were found for the parameter marginal adaptation , for which the FDI criteria were more sensitive than the USPHS criteria
However , for the ultra-mild All-Bond Universal adhesive , the etch- and -rinse strategy was significantly different than the self-etch mode in terms of dentin micro-tensile bond strength , as well as in the global analysis of enamel micro-tensile and micro-shear bond strength ( p≤0.05 ) .
The enamel bond strength of universal adhesives is improved with prior phosphoric acid etching .
However , this effect was not evident for dentin with the use of mild universal adhesives with the etch- and -rinse strategy .
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE Selective enamel etching prior to the application of a mild universal adhesive is an advisable strategy for optimizing bonding
OBJECTIVES A systematic review was conducted to determine whether the etch- and -rinse or self-etching mode is the best protocol for dentin and enamel adhesion by universal adhesives .