There is limited evidence to suggest which ablation method was the best .
There is limited evidence to suggest that CA may be a better treatment option compared to medical therapies in the management of persistent AF .
This review was also unable to recommend the best CA method
BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia seen in cardiovascular departments .
Treatments include medical interventions and catheter ablation .
Due to uncertainties in medical therapies for AF , and the need to continue sinus rhythm , ablation has been recently considered as a viable alternative .
Many new ablation methods based on pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) have been developed .
OBJECTIVES The primary objective of this review was to assess the beneficial and harmful effects of  catheter ablation ( CA ) in comparison with medical treatment in patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF .
The secondary objective was to determine the best regimen of CA .
Noninducibility of Atrial Fibrillation as an End Point of Left Atrial Circumferential Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized Study
Background —An anatomic approach of left atrial radiofrequency circumferential ablation ( LACA ) to encircle the pulmonary veins is often effective in eliminating  paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ( AF ) .  However , no electrophysiological end points other than voltage abatement and /or conduction slowing or block across ablation lines have been used . It has been unclear whether noninducibility of AF is a clinical ly useful end point . Methods and Results —In 100 patients with paroxysmal AF ( mean age , 55±10 years ) , LACA to encircle the left- and right-sided pulmonary veins was performed during AF , with additional ablation lines in the posterior left atrium and mitral isthmus , with an 8-mm-tip catheter . After completion of this lesion set , sinus rhythm was present , and AF lasting > 60 seconds was not inducible in 40 patients ( 40 % ; group 1 ) . The 60 patients in whom AF was still present or who still had inducible AF were r and omly assigned to no further ablation ( group 2 ; 30 patients ) or to additional ablation lines along the left atrial septum , roof , and /or anterior wall where there were fractionated electrograms ( group 3 ; 30 patients ) . In group 3 , AF was rendered noninducible in 27 of 30 patients ( 90 % ) . At a 6-month follow-up , 67 % of patients in group 2 were free of AF without drug therapy compared with 86 % of patients in group 3 . ( P=0.05 , log-rank test ) . Left atrial flutter occurred in 17 % and 27 % of patients in each group , respectively ( P=0.3 ) . Conclusions —After LACA in patients with paroxysmal AF , AF usually can be rendered noninducible by additional ablation at sites of fractionated electrograms . Noninducibility of AF attained by additional electrogram-guided left atrial ablation may be associated with a better midterm clinical outcome than when AF is still inducible after LACA alone
There is limited evidence to suggest which ablation method was the best .
There is limited evidence to suggest that CA may be a better treatment option compared to medical therapies in the management of persistent AF .
This review was also unable to recommend the best CA method
BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia seen in cardiovascular departments .
Treatments include medical interventions and catheter ablation .
Due to uncertainties in medical therapies for AF , and the need to continue sinus rhythm , ablation has been recently considered as a viable alternative .
Many new ablation methods based on pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) have been developed .
OBJECTIVES The primary objective of this review was to assess the beneficial and harmful effects of  catheter ablation ( CA ) in comparison with medical treatment in patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF .
The secondary objective was to determine the best regimen of CA .