The analysis of our outcomes illustrates the similarities and differences between the identified tests
Assessment s of gait , balance , and transfer in elderly people play a valuable role in maintaining healthy aging and preventing a decline in mobility .
Several evaluation tools have been proposed ; however , clinicians should select the most accurate ones wisely , based on numerous criteria .
This systematic review aims to identify all applicable elderly mobility assessment tests and show their measurement properties with as much detail as possible .
Comparative Utility of the BESTest, Mini-BESTest, and Brief-BESTest for Predicting Falls in Individuals With Parkinson Disease: A Cohort Study
Background The newly developed Brief – Balance Evaluation System Test ( Brief-BESTest ) may be useful for measuring balance and predicting falls in individuals with Parkinson disease ( PD ) . Objectives The purpose s of this study were : ( 1 ) to describe the balance performance of those with PD using the Brief-BESTest , ( 2 ) to determine the relationships among the scores derived from the 3 versions of the BESTest ( ie , full BESTest , Mini-BESTest , and Brief-BESTest ) , and ( 3 ) to compare the accuracy of the Brief-BESTest with that of the Mini-BESTest and BESTest in identifying recurrent fallers among people with PD . Design This was a prospect i ve cohort study . Methods Eighty participants with PD completed a baseline balance assessment . All participants reported a fall history during the previous 6 months . Fall history was again collected 6 months ( n=51 ) and 12 months ( n=40 ) later . Results At baseline , participants had varying levels of balance impairment , and  Brief-BESTest scores were significantly correlated with  Mini-BESTest  ( r=.94 , P<.001 ) and  BESTest  ( r=.95 , P<.001 ) scores . Six-month retrospective fall prediction accuracy of the Brief-BESTest was moderately high ( area under the curve [AUC]=0.82 , sensitivity=0.76 , and specificity=0.84 ) . Prospect i ve fall prediction accuracy over 6 months was similarly accurate ( AUC=0.88 , sensitivity=0.71 , and specificity=0.87 ) , but was less sensitive over 12 months ( AUC=0.76 , sensitivity=0.53 , and specificity=0.93 ) . Limitations The sample included primarily individuals with mild to moderate PD . Also , there was a moderate dropout rate at 6 and 12 months . Conclusions All versions of the BESTest were reasonably accurate in identifying future recurrent fallers , especially during the 6 months following assessment . Clinicians can reasonably rely on the Brief-BESTest for predicting falls , particularly when time and equipment constraints are of concern
The analysis of our outcomes illustrates the similarities and differences between the identified tests
Assessment s of gait , balance , and transfer in elderly people play a valuable role in maintaining healthy aging and preventing a decline in mobility .
Several evaluation tools have been proposed ; however , clinicians should select the most accurate ones wisely , based on numerous criteria .
This systematic review aims to identify all applicable elderly mobility assessment tests and show their measurement properties with as much detail as possible .