The cost of intervention per participant delivered by dietitians was lower than interventions delivered by non-dietitians , although few studies reported costs .
Lifestyle interventions are effective in reducing body weight and glucose-related outcomes .
Dietitian-delivered interventions , compared with those delivered by other personnel , achieved greater weight reduction .
No consistent trend was identified across different delivery channels
BACKGROUND Type 2 diabetes is a significant public health concern .
With the completion of the Diabetes Prevention Program , there has been a proliferation of studies attempting to translate this evidence base into practice .
However , the cost , effectiveness , and cost-effectiveness of these adapted interventions is unknown .
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this systematic review was to conduct a comprehensive meta- analysis to synthesize the effectiveness , cost , and cost-effectiveness of lifestyle diabetes prevention interventions and compare effects by intervention delivery agent ( dietitian vs non-dietitian ) and channel ( in-person vs technology-delivered ) .
Effect of a lifestyle intervention on weight change in south Asian individuals in the UK at high risk of type 2 diabetes: a family-cluster randomised controlled trial.
BACKGROUND The susceptibility to type 2 diabetes of people of south Asian descent is established , but there is little trial-based evidence for interventions to tackle this problem . We assessed a weight control and physical activity intervention in south Asian individuals in the UK . METHODS We did this non-blinded trial in two National Health Service ( NHS ) regions in Scotl and ( UK ) . Between July 1 , 2007 , and Oct 31 , 2009 , we recruited men and women of Indian and Pakistani origin , aged 35 years or older , with waist circumference 90 cm or greater in men or 80 cm or greater in women , and with impaired glucose tolerance or impaired fasting glucose determined by oral glucose tolerance test . Families were r and omised ( using a r and om number generator program , with permuted blocks of r and om size , stratified by location [ Edinburgh or Glasgow ] , ethnic group [ Indian or Pakistani ] , and number of participants in the family [ one vs more than one ] ) to intervention or control . Participants in the same family were not r and omised separately . The intervention group received 15 visits from a dietitian over 3 years and the control group received four visits in the same period . The primary outcome was weight change at 3 years . Analysis was by modified intention to treat , excluding participants who died or were lost to follow-up . We used linear regression models to provide mean differences in baseline-adjusted weight at 3 years . This trial is registered , number IS RCT N25729565 . FINDINGS Of 1319 people who were screened with an oral glucose tolerance test , 196 ( 15 % ) had impaired glucose tolerance or impaired fasting glucose and 171 entered the trial . Participants were in 156 family clusters that were r and omised ( 78 families with 85 participants were allocated to intervention ; 78 families with 86 participants were allocated to control ) . 167 ( 98 % ) participants in 152 families completed the trial .  Mean weight loss in the intervention group was 1.13 kg ( SD 4.12 ) , compared with a mean weight gain of 0.51 kg ( 3.65 ) in the control group , an adjusted mean difference of -1.64 kg ( 95 % CI -2.83 to -0.44 ) . INTERPRETATION Modest , medium-term changes in weight are achievable as a component of lifestyle-change strategies , which might control or prevent adiposity-related diseases . FUNDING National Prevention Research Initiative , NHS Research and Development ; NHS National Services Scotl and ; NHS Health Scotl and
The cost of intervention per participant delivered by dietitians was lower than interventions delivered by non-dietitians , although few studies reported costs .
Lifestyle interventions are effective in reducing body weight and glucose-related outcomes .
Dietitian-delivered interventions , compared with those delivered by other personnel , achieved greater weight reduction .
No consistent trend was identified across different delivery channels
BACKGROUND Type 2 diabetes is a significant public health concern .
With the completion of the Diabetes Prevention Program , there has been a proliferation of studies attempting to translate this evidence base into practice .
However , the cost , effectiveness , and cost-effectiveness of these adapted interventions is unknown .
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this systematic review was to conduct a comprehensive meta- analysis to synthesize the effectiveness , cost , and cost-effectiveness of lifestyle diabetes prevention interventions and compare effects by intervention delivery agent ( dietitian vs non-dietitian ) and channel ( in-person vs technology-delivered ) .