Basal levels of hormones were mostly normal in athletes with OTS/FOR/NFOR compared with healthy athletes .
Distinctly , stimulation tests , mainly performed in maximal exercise conditions , showed blunted GH and ACTH responses in OTS/FOR/NFOR athletes , whereas cortisol and plasma catecholamines showed conflicting findings and the other hormones responded normally .
Conclusion Basal hormone levels are not good predictor but blunted ACTH and GH responses to stimulation tests may be good predictors of OTS/FOR/NFOR
Background Overtraining syndrome ( OTS ) , functional ( FOR ) and non-functional overreaching ( NFOR ) are conditions diagnosed in athletes with decreased performance and fatigue , triggered by metabolic , immune , hormonal and other dysfunctions and result ed from an imbalance between training stress and proper recovery .
Despite previous descriptions , there is a lack of a review that discloses all hormonal findings in OTS/FOR/NFOR .
The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate whether and which roles hormones play in OTS/FOR/NFOR .
Impaired pituitary hormonal response to exhaustive exercise in overtrained endurance athletes.
The aim of the present prospect i ve longitudinal study was to investigate the hormonal response in overtrained athletes at rest and during exercise consisting of a short-term exhaustive endurance test on a cycle ergometer at an intensity 10 % above the individual anaerobic threshold . Over a period of 19+/-1 months , 17 male endurance athletes ( cyclists and triathletes ; age 23.4+/-1.6 yr ; VO2max . 61.2+/-1.8 mL x min(-1 ) x kg(-1 ) ; means+/-SEM ) were examined five times on two separate days under st and ardized conditions . Short-term overtraining states ( OT , N=15 ) were primarily induced by an increase of frequency of high-intensive bouts of exercise or competitions without increase of the total amount of training . OT was compared with normal training states intraindividually ( NS , N=62 ) . During OT , the time to exhaustion of the exercise test was significantly decreased by 27 % on average . At rest and during exercise , the concentrations in plasma and the nocturnal excretion in urine of free epinephrine and norepinephrine were not significantly changed during OT . At physical rest , the concentrations of ( free ) testosterone , cortisol , luteinizing hormone , follicle-stimulating hormone , adrenocorticotropic hormone , growth hormone , and insulin during OT were comparable with those during NS . A significantly ( P < 0.025 ) lower maximal exercise-induced increase of the adrenocorticotropic hormone and growth hormone , as well as a trend for a decrease of cortisol ( P=0.060 ) and insulin ( P=0.036 ) , was measured . The response of free catecholamines as well as the ergometric performance of an all-out 30-s test was unchanged . Serum urea , uric acid , ferritin , and activity of creatine kinase showed no differences between conditions . In conclusion , the results confirm the hypothesis of a hypothalamo-pituitary dysregulation during OT expressed by an impaired response of pituitary hormones to exhaustive short-endurance exercise
Basal levels of hormones were mostly normal in athletes with OTS/FOR/NFOR compared with healthy athletes .
Distinctly , stimulation tests , mainly performed in maximal exercise conditions , showed blunted GH and ACTH responses in OTS/FOR/NFOR athletes , whereas cortisol and plasma catecholamines showed conflicting findings and the other hormones responded normally .
Conclusion Basal hormone levels are not good predictor but blunted ACTH and GH responses to stimulation tests may be good predictors of OTS/FOR/NFOR
Background Overtraining syndrome ( OTS ) , functional ( FOR ) and non-functional overreaching ( NFOR ) are conditions diagnosed in athletes with decreased performance and fatigue , triggered by metabolic , immune , hormonal and other dysfunctions and result ed from an imbalance between training stress and proper recovery .
Despite previous descriptions , there is a lack of a review that discloses all hormonal findings in OTS/FOR/NFOR .
The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate whether and which roles hormones play in OTS/FOR/NFOR .