A minority of published evidence -based PA interventions for adults with T2D were both effective and pragmatic for clinical implementation .
Although regular physical activity ( PA ) is a cornerstone of treatment for type 2 diabetes ( T2D ) , most adults with T2D are sedentary .
R and omized controlled trials ( RCTs ) have proven the effectiveness of PA behavioral interventions for adults with T2D but have rarely been conducted in healthcare setting s. We sought to identify PA interventions that are effective and practical to implement in clinical practice setting s. Our first aim was to use the valid Pragmatic-Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary 2 ( PRECIS-2 ) tool to assess the potential for future implementation of PA interventions in clinical practice setting s. Our second aim was to identify interventions that effectively increased PA and glycemic control among the interventions in the top tertile of PRECIS-2 scores .
A randomized trial of an intervention to improve self-care behaviors of African-American women with type 2 diabetes: impact on physical activity.
OBJECTIVE To determine whether a culturally appropriate clinic- and community-based intervention for African-American women with type 2 diabetes will increase  moderate-intensity physical activity ( PA ) . RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS In this r and omized controlled trial conducted at seven practice s in central North Carolina , 200 African-American women , > or = 40 years of age with type 2 diabetes , were r and omized to one of three treatment conditions : clinic and community ( group A ) , clinic only ( group B ) , or minimal intervention ( group C ) . The clinic-based intervention ( groups A and B ) consisted of four monthly visits with a nutritionist who provided counseling to enhance PA and dietary intake that was tailored to baseline practice s and attitudes ; the community-based intervention ( group A ) consisted of three group sessions and 12 monthly phone calls from a peer counselor and was design ed to provide social support and reinforce behavior change goals ; and the minimal intervention ( group C ) consisted of educational pamphlets mailed to participants . The primary study outcome was the comparison of PA levels between groups assessed at 6 and 12 months by accelerometer , which was worn while awake for 7 days . RESULTS Totals of 175 ( 88 % ) and 167 ( 84 % ) participants completed PA assessment at 6 and 12 months , respectively . For comparison of PA , the P value for overall group effect was 0.014 . Comparing group A with C , the difference in the average adjusted mean for PA was 44.1 kcal/day ( 95 % CI 13.1 - 75.1 , P = 0.0055 ) . Comparing group B with C , the difference in the average adjusted mean was 33.1 kcal/day ( 95 % CI 3.3 - 62.8 , P = 0.029 ) . The intervention was acceptable to participants : 88 % were very satisfied with clinic-based counseling to enhance PA , and 86 % indicated that the peer counselor 's role in the program was important . CONCLUSIONS The intervention was associated with a modest enhancement of PA and was acceptable to participants
A minority of published evidence -based PA interventions for adults with T2D were both effective and pragmatic for clinical implementation .
Although regular physical activity ( PA ) is a cornerstone of treatment for type 2 diabetes ( T2D ) , most adults with T2D are sedentary .
R and omized controlled trials ( RCTs ) have proven the effectiveness of PA behavioral interventions for adults with T2D but have rarely been conducted in healthcare setting s. We sought to identify PA interventions that are effective and practical to implement in clinical practice setting s. Our first aim was to use the valid Pragmatic-Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary 2 ( PRECIS-2 ) tool to assess the potential for future implementation of PA interventions in clinical practice setting s. Our second aim was to identify interventions that effectively increased PA and glycemic control among the interventions in the top tertile of PRECIS-2 scores .