Conclusions Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation is effective at reducing important clinical outcomes in patients with coronary heart disease .
While our analysis was constrained by the quality of included trials and missing information about intervention components , there appears to be little differential effect of variations in exercise intervention , particularly on mortality outcomes .
Background While the clinical benefits of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation are well established , there is extensive variation in the interventions used within these trials .
It is unknown whether variations in individual components of these exercise interventions provide different relative contributions to overall clinical outcomes .
This study aims to systematic ally examine the relationship between individual components of the exercise intervention in cardiac rehabilitation ( such as intensity and frequency ) and clinical outcomes for people with coronary heart disease .
Randomized trial of an internet-based computer-tailored expert system for physical activity in patients with heart disease
Background : The CardioFit internet-based expert system was design ed to promote physical activity in patients with coronary heart disease ( CHD ) who were not participating in cardiac rehabilitation . Design : This r and omized controlled trial compared CardioFit to usual care to assess its effects on physical activity following hospitalization for acute coronary syndromes . Methods : A total of 223 participants were recruited at the University of Ottawa Heart Institute or London Health Sciences Centre and r and omly assigned to either  CardioFit  ( n = 115 ) or  usual care ( n = 108 ) . The CardioFit group received a personally tailored physical-activity plan upon discharge from the hospital and access to a secure website for activity planning and tracking . They completed five online tutorials over a 6-month period and were in email contact with an exercise specialist . Usual care consisted of physical activity guidance from an attending cardiologist .  Physical activity was measured by pedometer and self-reported over a 7-day period , 6 and 12 months after r and omization . Results : The CardioFit internet-based physical activity expert system significantly increased objective ly measured ( p = 0.023 ) and self-reported physical activity ( p = 0.047 ) compared to usual care . Emotional ( p = 0.038 ) and physical ( p = 0.031 ) dimensions of heart disease health-related quality of life were also higher with CardioFit compared to usual care . Conclusions : Patients with CHD using an internet-based activity prescription with online coaching were more physically active at follow up than those receiving usual care . Use of the CardioFit program could extend the reach of rehabilitation and secondary -prevention services
Conclusions Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation is effective at reducing important clinical outcomes in patients with coronary heart disease .
While our analysis was constrained by the quality of included trials and missing information about intervention components , there appears to be little differential effect of variations in exercise intervention , particularly on mortality outcomes .
Background While the clinical benefits of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation are well established , there is extensive variation in the interventions used within these trials .
It is unknown whether variations in individual components of these exercise interventions provide different relative contributions to overall clinical outcomes .
This study aims to systematic ally examine the relationship between individual components of the exercise intervention in cardiac rehabilitation ( such as intensity and frequency ) and clinical outcomes for people with coronary heart disease .