RECENT FINDINGS Several r and omized control trials and systematic review s demonstrate the safety and efficacy of atrial fibrillation ablation in patients with heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction .
In multiple trials , these patients have shown clinical benefit from atrial fibrillation ablation including improved left ventricular systolic function , quality of life , and clinical heart failure symptoms .
SUMMARY Atrial fibrillation ablation in heart failure patients remains well tolerated with an overall efficacy comparable to atrial fibrillation ablation in patients without heart failure .
There is consistent evidence for the clinical benefit of atrial fibrillation ablation in heart failure patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction and limited evidence for atrial fibrillation ablation in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction .
Currently , there is insufficient data regarding the safety and efficacy of left atrial appendage closure devices in heart failure patients
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure experience an increased morbidity and mortality from the hemodynamic consequences of atrial fibrillation and an increased stroke risk .
Consequently , there has been increased attention to procedural alternatives to pharmacologic rhythm control and anticoagulation for stroke prevention .
This review aims to evaluate the evidence for atrial fibrillation ablation and left atrial appendage closure in heart failure patients .
Catheter ablation in selected patients with depressed left ventricular ejection fraction and persistent atrial fibrillation unresponsive to current cardioversion.
AIMS In congestive heart failure ( CHF ) patients with persistent atrial fibrillation ( AF ) , direct current cardioversion ( DCC ) may reveal participation of tachycardiamediated process to left ventricular ( LV ) dysfunction by restoring sinus rhythm ( SR ) . However , if DCC fails to restore SR , patients ' management remains challenging . The aim of the study was to assess the AF catheter ablation benefit in a selected group of CHF patients with LV ejection fraction ( LVEF ) < 40 % and persistent AF unresponsive to DCC , in whom a tachycardia-mediated process is thought to be predominant . METHODS AND RESULTS Between January 2008 and September 2011 , among 129 CHF patients with persistent AF referred to our institution , 34 ( 63.8 ± 9-year old , 24 men ) presented AF refractory to DCC with an estimated high likelihood of tachycardia-mediated LV dysfunction according to a specific set of criteria . These 34 patients underwent stepwise AF ablation and were closely followed up . After a mean 1.9 AF ablation procedures per patient and 17.6 ± 7 months after the last procedure , all patients were in SR . The New York Heart Association class improved from 2.8 ± 0.3 to 1 ± 0.2 ( P < 0.001 ) and the LVEF increased from 30.4 ± 6 to 54.6 ± 6 % ( P < 0.0001 ) after 3 - 6 months of SR , with a persistent benefit as long as the SR was maintained . CONCLUSION Atrial fibrillation catheter ablation in selected CHF patients with persistent AF refractory to DCC and without any other evidence for secondary LV dysfunction leads to a substantial LVEF improvement in the majority of them . However , redo procedures are frequent in order to achieve mid-term SR maintenance
RECENT FINDINGS Several r and omized control trials and systematic review s demonstrate the safety and efficacy of atrial fibrillation ablation in patients with heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction .
In multiple trials , these patients have shown clinical benefit from atrial fibrillation ablation including improved left ventricular systolic function , quality of life , and clinical heart failure symptoms .
SUMMARY Atrial fibrillation ablation in heart failure patients remains well tolerated with an overall efficacy comparable to atrial fibrillation ablation in patients without heart failure .
There is consistent evidence for the clinical benefit of atrial fibrillation ablation in heart failure patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction and limited evidence for atrial fibrillation ablation in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction .
Currently , there is insufficient data regarding the safety and efficacy of left atrial appendage closure devices in heart failure patients
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure experience an increased morbidity and mortality from the hemodynamic consequences of atrial fibrillation and an increased stroke risk .
Consequently , there has been increased attention to procedural alternatives to pharmacologic rhythm control and anticoagulation for stroke prevention .
This review aims to evaluate the evidence for atrial fibrillation ablation and left atrial appendage closure in heart failure patients .