All 4 faces pain scales were found to be adequately supported by psychometric data .
When given a choice between faces scales , children preferred the WBFPRS .
Confounding of pain intensity with affect caused by use of smiling and crying anchor faces is a disadvantage of the WBFPRS .
: For clinical use , we found no grounds to switch from 1 faces scale to another when 1 of the scales is in use .
CONTEXT : Numerous faces scales have been developed for the measurement of  pain intensity in children .
It remains unclear whether any one of the faces scales is better for a particular purpose with regard to validity , reliability , feasibility , and preference .
OBJECTIVES : To summarize and systematic ally review faces pain scales most commonly used to obtain self-report of pain intensity in children for evaluation of reliability and validity and to compare the scales for preference and utility .
Analgesic efficacy of ketorolac 0.5% ophthalmic solution (Accular) in paediatric strabismus surgery.
This prospect i ve double-blind study was design ed to assess the analgesic efficacy of ketorolac 0.5 % ophthalmic solution compared with placebo in 30 healthy children undergoing extraocular muscle recession for correction of strabismus . After paracetamol 20 mg.kg-1 preoperatively , a st and ard anaesthetic was given . There were no significant differences in Children 's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale ( CHEOPS ) and faces pain scale ( FPS ) scores , requirement for supplementary analgesia or in postoperative vomiting between the two groups over the following 24 h. This study did not demonstrate improved postoperative analgesia when topical ketorolac eye drops were given in addition to paracetamol . This observed lack of efficacy may reflect difficulties in the use of CHEOPS and FPS in this age group with this pain model
All 4 faces pain scales were found to be adequately supported by psychometric data .
When given a choice between faces scales , children preferred the WBFPRS .
Confounding of pain intensity with affect caused by use of smiling and crying anchor faces is a disadvantage of the WBFPRS .
: For clinical use , we found no grounds to switch from 1 faces scale to another when 1 of the scales is in use .
CONTEXT : Numerous faces scales have been developed for the measurement of  pain intensity in children .
It remains unclear whether any one of the faces scales is better for a particular purpose with regard to validity , reliability , feasibility , and preference .
OBJECTIVES : To summarize and systematic ally review faces pain scales most commonly used to obtain self-report of pain intensity in children for evaluation of reliability and validity and to compare the scales for preference and utility .