Bayesian network meta- analysis using a r and om-effects model demonstrated that ranolazine + amiodarone intravenous ( IV ) [ odds ratio ( OR ) 39.8 , 95 % credible interval ( CrI ) 8.3 - 203.1 ] , vernakalant ( OR 22.9 , 95 % CrI 3.7 - 146.3 ) , flecainide ( OR 16.9 , 95 % CrI 4.1 - 73.3 ) , amiodarone oral ( OR 10.2 , 95 % CrI 3.1 - 36.0 ) , ibutilide ( OR 7.9 , 95 % CrI 1.2 - 52.5 ) , amiodarone IV ( OR 5.4 , 95 % CrI 2.1 - 14.6 ) , and propafenone ( OR 4.1 , 95 % CrI 1.7 - 10.5 ) were associated with significantly increased likelihood of conversion within 24 h when compared to placebo/control .
Probabilistic analysis ranked vernakalant and flecainide high and propafenone and amiodarone IV low .
For pharmacologic cardioversion of recent-onset AF within 24 h , there is insufficient evidence to determine which treatment is superior .
Vernakalant and flecainide may be relatively more efficacious agents .
Propafenone and IV amiodarone may be relatively less efficacious .
AIMS We sought to identify the most effective antidysrhythmic drug for pharmacologic cardioversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation ( AF ) .
Estimating the Power of Indirect Comparisons: A Simulation Study
Background Indirect comparisons are becoming increasingly popular for evaluating medical treatments that have not been compared head-to-head in r and omized clinical trials ( RCTs ) . While indirect methods have grown in popularity and acceptance , little is known about the fragility of confidence interval estimations and hypothesis testing relying on this method . Methods We present the findings of a simulation study that examined the fragility of indirect confidence interval estimation and hypothesis testing relying on the adjusted indirect method . Findings Our results suggest that , for the setting s considered in this study , indirect confidence interval estimation suffers from under-coverage while indirect hypothesis testing suffers from low power in the presence of moderate to large between- study heterogeneity . In addition , the risk of overestimation is large when the indirect comparison of interest relies on just one trial for one of the two direct comparisons . Interpretation Indirect comparisons typically suffer from low power . The risk of imprecision is increased when comparisons are unbalanced
Bayesian network meta- analysis using a r and om-effects model demonstrated that ranolazine + amiodarone intravenous ( IV ) [ odds ratio ( OR ) 39.8 , 95 % credible interval ( CrI ) 8.3 - 203.1 ] , vernakalant ( OR 22.9 , 95 % CrI 3.7 - 146.3 ) , flecainide ( OR 16.9 , 95 % CrI 4.1 - 73.3 ) , amiodarone oral ( OR 10.2 , 95 % CrI 3.1 - 36.0 ) , ibutilide ( OR 7.9 , 95 % CrI 1.2 - 52.5 ) , amiodarone IV ( OR 5.4 , 95 % CrI 2.1 - 14.6 ) , and propafenone ( OR 4.1 , 95 % CrI 1.7 - 10.5 ) were associated with significantly increased likelihood of conversion within 24 h when compared to placebo/control .
Probabilistic analysis ranked vernakalant and flecainide high and propafenone and amiodarone IV low .
For pharmacologic cardioversion of recent-onset AF within 24 h , there is insufficient evidence to determine which treatment is superior .
Vernakalant and flecainide may be relatively more efficacious agents .
Propafenone and IV amiodarone may be relatively less efficacious .
AIMS We sought to identify the most effective antidysrhythmic drug for pharmacologic cardioversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation ( AF ) .