We found high quality evidence that hormone therapy in both primary and secondary prevention conferred no protective effects for all-cause mortality , cardiovascular death , non-fatal myocardial infa rct ion , angina , or revascularisation .
There was no strong evidence of effect on risk of stroke in this group .
Our review findings provide strong evidence that treatment with hormone therapy in post-menopausal women overall , for either primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease events has little if any benefit and causes an increase in the risk of stroke and venous thromboembolic events
BACKGROUND Evidence from systematic review s of observational studies suggests that hormone therapy may have beneficial effects in reducing the incidence of cardiovascular disease events in post-menopausal women , however the results of r and omised controlled trials ( RCTs ) have had mixed results .
This is an up date d version of a Cochrane review published in 2013 .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of hormone therapy for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in post-menopausal women , and whether there are differential effects between use in primary or secondary prevention .
Secondary aims were to undertake exploratory analyses to ( i ) assess the impact of time since menopause that treatment was commenced ( ≥ 10 years versus < 10 years ) , and where these data were not available , use age of trial participants at baseline as a proxy ( ≥ 60 years of age versus < 60 years of age ) ; and ( ii ) assess the effects of length of time on treatment .
Symptom reporting and quality of life in the Estonian Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy Trial
Background The aim of the study was to determine the effect of postmenopausal hormone therapy on women 's symptom reporting and quality of life in a r and omized trial . Methods 1823 women participated in the Estonian Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy ( EPHT ) Trial between 1999 and 2004 . Women were r and omized to open-label continuous combined hormone therapy or no treatment , or to blind hormone therapy or placebo . The average follow-up period was 3.6 years . Prevalence of symptoms and quality of life according to EQ-5D were assessed by annually mailed question naires . Results In the hormone therapy arms , less women reported hot flushes ( OR 0.20 ; 95 % CI : 0.14–0.28 ) , sweating ( OR 0.56 ; 95 % CI : 0.44–0.72 ) , and sleeping problems ( OR 0.66 ; 95 % CI : 0.52–0.84 ) , but more women reported episodes of vaginal bleeding ( OR 19.65 ; 95 % CI : 12.15–31.79 ) . There was no difference between the trial arms in the prevalence of other symptoms over time . Quality of life did not depend on hormone therapy use . Conclusion Postmenopausal hormone therapy decreased vasomotor symptoms and sleeping problems , but increased episodes of vaginal bleeding , and had no effect on quality of life . Trial registration numberIS RCT
We found high quality evidence that hormone therapy in both primary and secondary prevention conferred no protective effects for all-cause mortality , cardiovascular death , non-fatal myocardial infa rct ion , angina , or revascularisation .
There was no strong evidence of effect on risk of stroke in this group .
Our review findings provide strong evidence that treatment with hormone therapy in post-menopausal women overall , for either primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease events has little if any benefit and causes an increase in the risk of stroke and venous thromboembolic events
BACKGROUND Evidence from systematic review s of observational studies suggests that hormone therapy may have beneficial effects in reducing the incidence of cardiovascular disease events in post-menopausal women , however the results of r and omised controlled trials ( RCTs ) have had mixed results .
This is an up date d version of a Cochrane review published in 2013 .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of hormone therapy for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in post-menopausal women , and whether there are differential effects between use in primary or secondary prevention .
Secondary aims were to undertake exploratory analyses to ( i ) assess the impact of time since menopause that treatment was commenced ( ≥ 10 years versus < 10 years ) , and where these data were not available , use age of trial participants at baseline as a proxy ( ≥ 60 years of age versus < 60 years of age ) ; and ( ii ) assess the effects of length of time on treatment .