RESULTS Knowledge translation interventions appear to have result ed in a positive change in physiotherapist beliefs , attitudes , skills and guideline awareness .
However , no consistent improvement in clinical practice , patient and economic outcomes were observed .
AND IMPLICATION OF KEY FINDINGS The intensity and type of knowledge translation intervention seem to have an effect on practice change .
BACKGROUND Many physiotherapists underuse evidence -based practice guidelines or recommendations when treating patients with musculoskeletal disorders , yet synthesis of knowledge translation interventions used within the field of physiotherapy fails to offer clear conclusions to guide the implementation of clinical practice guidelines .
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effectiveness of various  knowledge translation interventions used to implement changes in the practice of current physiotherapists treating common musculoskeletal issues .
Effect on the process of care of an active strategy to implement clinical guidelines on physiotherapy for low back pain: a cluster randomised controlled trial
Objectives : To evaluate the effect on the process of care of an active strategy to implement clinical guidelines on physiotherapy for low back pain . Design : A cluster r and omised controlled trial comparing an active strategy with st and ard dissemination . Setting : Primary care physiotherapy practice s. Participants : 113 physiotherapists were r and omly allocated to receive the guidelines by mail ( control group ) or to receive an additional active strategy ( intervention group ) which consisted of a multifaceted programme including education , discussion , role playing , feedback , and reminders . Main outcome measures : Adherence to the guidelines was measured by means of individual patients ’ forms recording the treatment completed by the physiotherapist . The forms were assessed using an algorithm based on the number of treatment sessions , treatment goals , interventions , and patient education . Results : Physiotherapists in the intervention group more often correctly limited the number of treatment sessions for patients with a normal course of back pain ( OR 2.39 ; 95 % CI 1.12 to 5.12 ) , more often set functional treatment goals ( OR 1.99 ; 95 % CI 1.06 to 3.72 ) , more often used mainly active interventions ( OR 2.79 ; 95 % CI 1.19 to 6.55 ) , and more often gave adequate patient education ( OR 3.59 ; 95 % CI 1.35 to 9.55 ) . They also adhered more to all four criteria ( OR 2.05 ; 95 % CI 1.15 to 3.65 ) . Conclusions : The active strategy moderately improved adherence to the guidelines . Active strategies are recommended to implement the clinical guidelines on physiotherapy for low back pain
RESULTS Knowledge translation interventions appear to have result ed in a positive change in physiotherapist beliefs , attitudes , skills and guideline awareness .
However , no consistent improvement in clinical practice , patient and economic outcomes were observed .
AND IMPLICATION OF KEY FINDINGS The intensity and type of knowledge translation intervention seem to have an effect on practice change .
BACKGROUND Many physiotherapists underuse evidence -based practice guidelines or recommendations when treating patients with musculoskeletal disorders , yet synthesis of knowledge translation interventions used within the field of physiotherapy fails to offer clear conclusions to guide the implementation of clinical practice guidelines .
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effectiveness of various  knowledge translation interventions used to implement changes in the practice of current physiotherapists treating common musculoskeletal issues .