However , the 95 % confidence intervals of these outcomes suggest the lower BP target is probably not worse , and might offer a clinical ly important benefit .
AUTHORS ' CONCLUSIONS At the present time there is insufficient evidence to know whether a higher BP target ( less than150 to 160/95 to 105 mmHg ) or a lower BP target ( less than 140/90 mmHg ) is better for older adults with high BP .
BACKGROUND Eight out of 10 major antihypertensive trials in older adults attempted to achieve a target systolic blood pressure ( BP ) less than 160 mmHg .
Collectively these trials demonstrated benefit for treatment , as compared to no treatment , for an older adult with BP greater than 160 mmHg .
However an even lower BP target of less than 140 mmHg is commonly applied to all age groups .
At the present time it is not known whether a lower or higher BP target is associated with better cardiovascular outcomes in older adults .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of a higher ( less than 150 to 160/95 to 105 mmHg ) BP target compared to the lower BP target of less than 140/90 mmHg in hypertensive adults 65 years of age or older .
Effects of intensive antihypertensive treatment on Chinese hypertensive patients older than 70 years.
This study was performed to investigate whether intensive antihypertensive treatment with achieved blood pressure ( BP ) ≤140/90 mm Hg , as compared with st and ard treatment with achieved BP ≤150/90 mm Hg , could further improve cardiovascular outcomes in Chinese hypertensive patients older than 70 years . A total of 724 participants were r and omly assigned to intensive or st and ard antihypertensive treatment . After a mean follow-up of 4 years , the mean achieved BP was 135.7/76.2 mm Hg in the intensive treatment group and 149.7/82.1 mm Hg in the st and ard treatment group . The visit-to-visit variability in systolic BP and diastolic BP was lower in the intensive group than that in the st and ard group . Intensive antihypertensive treatment , compared with the st and ard treatment , decreased total and cardiovascular mortality by 41.7 % and 50.3 % , respectively , and reduced fatal/nonfatal stroke by 42.0 % and heart failure death by 62.7 % . Cox regression analysis indicated that the mean systolic BP ( P=.020 ; 95 % confidence interval , 1.006 - 1.069 ) and the st and ard deviation of systolic BP ( P=.033 ; 95 % confidence interval , 1.006 - 1.151 ) were risk factors for cardiovascular endpoint events . Intensive antihypertensive treatment with achieved 136/76 mm Hg was beneficial for Chinese hypertensive patients older than 70 years . Long-term visit-to-visit variability in systolic BP was positively associated with the incidence of cardiovascular events
However , the 95 % confidence intervals of these outcomes suggest the lower BP target is probably not worse , and might offer a clinical ly important benefit .
AUTHORS ' CONCLUSIONS At the present time there is insufficient evidence to know whether a higher BP target ( less than150 to 160/95 to 105 mmHg ) or a lower BP target ( less than 140/90 mmHg ) is better for older adults with high BP .
BACKGROUND Eight out of 10 major antihypertensive trials in older adults attempted to achieve a target systolic blood pressure ( BP ) less than 160 mmHg .
Collectively these trials demonstrated benefit for treatment , as compared to no treatment , for an older adult with BP greater than 160 mmHg .
However an even lower BP target of less than 140 mmHg is commonly applied to all age groups .
At the present time it is not known whether a lower or higher BP target is associated with better cardiovascular outcomes in older adults .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of a higher ( less than 150 to 160/95 to 105 mmHg ) BP target compared to the lower BP target of less than 140/90 mmHg in hypertensive adults 65 years of age or older .