We found high quality evidence that hormone therapy in both primary and secondary prevention conferred no protective effects for all-cause mortality , cardiovascular death , non-fatal myocardial infa rct ion , angina , or revascularisation .
There was no strong evidence of effect on risk of stroke in this group .
Our review findings provide strong evidence that treatment with hormone therapy in post-menopausal women overall , for either primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease events has little if any benefit and causes an increase in the risk of stroke and venous thromboembolic events
BACKGROUND Evidence from systematic review s of observational studies suggests that hormone therapy may have beneficial effects in reducing the incidence of cardiovascular disease events in post-menopausal women , however the results of r and omised controlled trials ( RCTs ) have had mixed results .
This is an up date d version of a Cochrane review published in 2013 .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of hormone therapy for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in post-menopausal women , and whether there are differential effects between use in primary or secondary prevention .
Secondary aims were to undertake exploratory analyses to ( i ) assess the impact of time since menopause that treatment was commenced ( ≥ 10 years versus < 10 years ) , and where these data were not available , use age of trial participants at baseline as a proxy ( ≥ 60 years of age versus < 60 years of age ) ; and ( ii ) assess the effects of length of time on treatment .
Hormone therapy and coronary heart disease: the role of time since menopause and age at hormone initiation.
BACKGROUND Apparently discrepant findings have been reported by the Women 's Health Initiative ( WHI ) trial compared with observational studies of postmenopausal hormone therapy ( HT ) and coronary heart disease ( CHD ) . METHODS We prospect ively examined the relation of HT to CHD , according to timing of hormone initiation relative to age and time since menopause . Participants were postmenopausal women in the Nurses ' Health Study , with follow-up from 1976 to 2000 . Information on hormone use was ascertained in biennial , mailed question naires . We used proportional hazards models to calculate multivariable adjusted relative risks ( RR ) and 95 % confidence intervals ( CI ) . We also conducted sensitivity analyses to determine the possible influence of incomplete capture of coronary events occurring shortly after initiation of HT . RESULTS Women beginning HT near menopause had a significantly reduced risk of CHD ( RR = 0.66 , 95 % CI 0.54 - 0.80 for estrogen alone ; RR = 0.72 , 95 % CI 0.56 - 0.92 for estrogen with progestin ) . In the subgroup of women demographically similar to those in the WHI , we found no significant relation between HT and CHD among women who initiated therapy at least 10 years after menopause ( RR = 0.87 , 95 % CI 0.69 - 1.10 for estrogen alone ; RR = 0.90 , 95 % CI 0.62 - 1.29 for estrogen with progestin ) . Among women who began taking hormones at older ages , we also found no relation between current use of estrogen alone and CHD ( for women aged 60 + years , RR = 1.07 , 95 % CI 0.65 - 1.78 ) , although there was a suggestion of possible reduced risk for combined HT ( RR = 0.65 , 95 % CI 0.31 - 1.38 ) . In sensitivity analyses , we found that the incomplete capture of coronary events occurring shortly after initiation of HT could not explain our observation of a reduced risk of coronary disease for current users of HT . CONCLUSIONS These data support the possibility that timing of HT initiation in relation to menopause onset or to age might influence coronary risk
We found high quality evidence that hormone therapy in both primary and secondary prevention conferred no protective effects for all-cause mortality , cardiovascular death , non-fatal myocardial infa rct ion , angina , or revascularisation .
There was no strong evidence of effect on risk of stroke in this group .
Our review findings provide strong evidence that treatment with hormone therapy in post-menopausal women overall , for either primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease events has little if any benefit and causes an increase in the risk of stroke and venous thromboembolic events
BACKGROUND Evidence from systematic review s of observational studies suggests that hormone therapy may have beneficial effects in reducing the incidence of cardiovascular disease events in post-menopausal women , however the results of r and omised controlled trials ( RCTs ) have had mixed results .
This is an up date d version of a Cochrane review published in 2013 .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of hormone therapy for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in post-menopausal women , and whether there are differential effects between use in primary or secondary prevention .
Secondary aims were to undertake exploratory analyses to ( i ) assess the impact of time since menopause that treatment was commenced ( ≥ 10 years versus < 10 years ) , and where these data were not available , use age of trial participants at baseline as a proxy ( ≥ 60 years of age versus < 60 years of age ) ; and ( ii ) assess the effects of length of time on treatment .