For hip fracture , at a 15 % relative risk , the effect estimate lay between the futility boundary and the inferior boundary , meaning there is reliable evidence that vitamin D supplementation does not reduce hip fractures by this amount , but uncertainty remains as to whether it might increase hip fractures .
The effect estimate lay within the futility boundary at thresholds of 0·5 % for total hip , forearm , and total body bone mineral density , and 1·0 % for lumbar spine and femoral neck , providing reliable evidence that vitamin D does not alter these outcomes by these amounts .
INTERPRETATION Our findings suggest that vitamin D supplementation does not prevent fractures or falls , or have clinical ly meaningful effects on bone mineral density .
There were no differences between the effects of higher and lower doses of vitamin D. There is little justification to use vitamin D supplements to maintain or improve musculoskeletal health .
BACKGROUND The effects of vitamin D on fractures , falls , and bone mineral density are uncertain , particularly for high vitamin D doses .
We aim ed to determine the effect of vitamin D supplementation on fractures , falls , and bone density .
Preventing fractures among older people living in institutional care: a pragmatic randomised double blind placebo controlled trial of vitamin D supplementation
Introduction Osteoporotic fractures in older people are a major and increasing public health problem . We examined the effect of vitamin D supplementation on fracture rate in people living in sheltered accommodation . Methods In a pragmatic double blind r and omised controlled trial of 3 years duration , we examined 3,440 people ( 2,624 women and 816 men ) living in residential or care home . We used four-monthly oral supplementation using 100,000 IU vitamin D2 ( ergocalciferol ) . As a main outcome measure , we used the incidence of first fracture using an intention to treat analysis . This was a multicentre study in 314 care homes or sheltered accommodation complexes in South Wales , UK . Results The vitamin D and placebo groups had similar baseline characteristics . In intention-to-treat analysis , 205 first fractures occurred in the intervention group during a total of 2,846 person years of follow-up ( 7 fractures per 100 people per year of follow-up ) , with 218 first fractures in the control group over 2,860 person years of follow-up . The hazard ratio of 0.95 ( 95 % confidence interval 0.79–1.15 ) for intervention compared to control was not statistically significant . ConclusionS upplementation with four-monthly 100,000 IU of oral vitamin D2 is not sufficient to affect fracture incidence among older people living in institutional care
For hip fracture , at a 15 % relative risk , the effect estimate lay between the futility boundary and the inferior boundary , meaning there is reliable evidence that vitamin D supplementation does not reduce hip fractures by this amount , but uncertainty remains as to whether it might increase hip fractures .
The effect estimate lay within the futility boundary at thresholds of 0·5 % for total hip , forearm , and total body bone mineral density , and 1·0 % for lumbar spine and femoral neck , providing reliable evidence that vitamin D does not alter these outcomes by these amounts .
INTERPRETATION Our findings suggest that vitamin D supplementation does not prevent fractures or falls , or have clinical ly meaningful effects on bone mineral density .
There were no differences between the effects of higher and lower doses of vitamin D. There is little justification to use vitamin D supplements to maintain or improve musculoskeletal health .
BACKGROUND The effects of vitamin D on fractures , falls , and bone mineral density are uncertain , particularly for high vitamin D doses .
We aim ed to determine the effect of vitamin D supplementation on fractures , falls , and bone density .