Although the majority of the studies reported that the use of root canal sealers increased the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth , conflicting evidence was found for the reinforcing effect of resin , glass ionomer , and calcium silicate-based sealers while there was moderate evidence for zinc oxide eugenol-based sealers in favor of no reinforcing effect .
Conclusion On the basis of available evidence , the use of root canal sealer increases the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth .
Regarding the comparisons among the sealers , no conclusions could be drawn for the superiority of one sealer type to another .
Objective The purpose of this study was to systematic ally review and critically analyze the published data of in vitro studies testing the effect of root canal sealers on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth .
In vitro fracture resistance of roots obturated with epoxy resin-based, mineral trioxide aggregate-based, and bioceramic root canal sealers.
INTRODUCTION The aim of this study was to evaluate the fracture resistance of teeth filled with 3 different endodontic sealers . METHODS Seventy-five single-rooted extracted m and ibular premolars were decoronated to a length of 13 mm . The teeth were r and omly divided into 5 groups ( n = 15 for each group ) . In group 1 , the teeth were left unprepared and unfilled ( negative control ) , and in group 2 , the teeth were left unobturated ( positive control ) . The rest of the roots were prepared by using the ProTaper System up to a master apical file size of F3 : group 3 , bioceramic sealer ( Endosequence BC sealer ) + gutta-percha ; group 4 , mineral trioxide aggregate-based sealer ( Tech Biosealer Endo ) + gutta-percha ; and group 5 , epoxy resin-based sealer ( AH Plus Jet ) + gutta-percha . All root specimens were stored for 2 weeks at 100 % humidity to allow the complete setting of the sealers . Each specimen was then subjected to fracture testing by using a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1.0 mm/min(-1 ) until the root fractured . The force required to fracture each specimen was recorded , and the data were analyzed statistically . RESULTS The fracture values of groups 3 and 5 were significantly higher than those of group 4 ( P < .05 ) . There was no significant difference between groups 3 and 5 ( P > .05 ) . CONCLUSIONS In contrast to Tech Biosealer Endo , Endosequence BC and AH Plus Jet sealer increased the force to fracture in root-filled single-rooted premolar teeth
Although the majority of the studies reported that the use of root canal sealers increased the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth , conflicting evidence was found for the reinforcing effect of resin , glass ionomer , and calcium silicate-based sealers while there was moderate evidence for zinc oxide eugenol-based sealers in favor of no reinforcing effect .
Conclusion On the basis of available evidence , the use of root canal sealer increases the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth .
Regarding the comparisons among the sealers , no conclusions could be drawn for the superiority of one sealer type to another .
Objective The purpose of this study was to systematic ally review and critically analyze the published data of in vitro studies testing the effect of root canal sealers on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth .