A significant positive effect of the interventions on weight was reported by all study types .
The meta- analysis showed that lifestyle interventions achieved weight and waist circumference reductions after one year .
However , no clear effects on biochemical or clinical parameters were observed , possibly due to short follow-up periods or lack of power of the studies meta-analysed .
Changes in dietary parameters or physical activity were generally not reported .
Most studies assessing feasibility were supportive of implementation of lifestyle interventions in routine clinical care .
Conclusion Lifestyle interventions for patients at high risk of diabetes , delivered by a variety of healthcare providers in routine clinical setting s , are feasible but appear to be of limited clinical benefit one year after intervention .
Despite convincing evidence from structured intensive trials , this systematic review showed that translation into routine practice has less effect on diabetes risk reduction
Background The clinical effectiveness of intensive lifestyle interventions in preventing or delaying diabetes in people at high risk has been established from r and omised trials of structured , intensive interventions conducted in several countries over the past two decades .
The challenge is to translate them into routine clinical setting s. The objective of this review is to determine whether lifestyle interventions delivered to high-risk adult patients in routine clinical care setting s are feasible and effective in achieving reductions in risk factors for diabetes .
Sustained reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes by lifestyle intervention: follow-up of the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study
BACKGROUND Lifestyle interventions can prevent the deterioration of impaired glucose tolerance to manifest type 2 diabetes , at least as long as the intervention continues . In the extended follow-up of the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study , we assessed the extent to which the originally-achieved lifestyle changes and risk reduction remain after discontinuation of active counselling . METHODS Overweight , middle-aged men ( n=172 ) and women ( n=350 ) with impaired glucose tolerance were r and omly assigned to intensive lifestyle intervention or control group . After a median of 4 years of active intervention period , participants who were still free of diabetes were further followed up for a median of 3 years , with median total follow-up of 7 years . Diabetes incidence , bodyweight , physical activity , and dietary intakes of fat , saturated fat , and fibre were measured . FINDINGS During the total follow-up , the incidence of type 2 diabetes was 4.3 and 7.4 per 100 person-years in the intervention and control group , respectively ( log-rank test p=0.0001 ) , indicating 43 % reduction in relative risk . The risk reduction was related to the success in achieving the intervention goals of weight loss , reduced intake of total and saturated fat and increased intake of dietary fibre , and increased physical activity . Beneficial lifestyle changes achieved by participants in the intervention group were maintained after the discontinuation of the intervention , and the corresponding incidence rates during the post-intervention follow-up were 4.6 and 7.2 ( p=0.0401 ) , indicating 36 % reduction in relative risk . INTERPRETATION Lifestyle intervention in people at high risk for type 2 diabetes result ed in sustained lifestyle changes and a reduction in diabetes incidence , which remained after the individual lifestyle counselling was stopped
A significant positive effect of the interventions on weight was reported by all study types .
The meta- analysis showed that lifestyle interventions achieved weight and waist circumference reductions after one year .
However , no clear effects on biochemical or clinical parameters were observed , possibly due to short follow-up periods or lack of power of the studies meta-analysed .
Changes in dietary parameters or physical activity were generally not reported .
Most studies assessing feasibility were supportive of implementation of lifestyle interventions in routine clinical care .
Conclusion Lifestyle interventions for patients at high risk of diabetes , delivered by a variety of healthcare providers in routine clinical setting s , are feasible but appear to be of limited clinical benefit one year after intervention .
Despite convincing evidence from structured intensive trials , this systematic review showed that translation into routine practice has less effect on diabetes risk reduction
Background The clinical effectiveness of intensive lifestyle interventions in preventing or delaying diabetes in people at high risk has been established from r and omised trials of structured , intensive interventions conducted in several countries over the past two decades .
The challenge is to translate them into routine clinical setting s. The objective of this review is to determine whether lifestyle interventions delivered to high-risk adult patients in routine clinical care setting s are feasible and effective in achieving reductions in risk factors for diabetes .