In claudication patients , SE is more effective than UE at improving maximal walking and claudication distances , yet there is no difference in general quality of life or patient-reported community-based walking .
BACKGROUND Supervised exercise ( SE ) is widely accepted as an effective therapy for intermittent claudication ( IC ) , but its use is limited by cost .
Unsupervised exercise ( UE ) represents a less costly alternative .
We assessed the comparative effectiveness of SE vs UE in patients with IC .
Peripheral arterial disease and intermittent claudication: efficacy of short-term upper body strength training, dynamic exercise training, and advice to exercise at home.
OBJECTIVE To compare the effect of two training programmes and advice to exercise at home on physiological adaptations in patients with peripheral arterial disease ( PAD ) . DESIGN 30 patients with a typical history of PAD and intermittent claudication were r and omised to either an upper body strength training programme ( UBST ) , a dynamic ( walking , cycling , circuit ) conventional exercise rehabilitation programme ( CER ) , or advice to ' walk as much as possible at home ' ( CONT ) . Before and after intervention groups performed a st and ard grade d treadmill exercise test ( GTET ) and a 6-minute walk test ( SMWT ) to determine peak physiological parameters and walking distances . Maximal walking distance ( MWD ) , pain-free walking distance ( PFWD ) , peak oxygen uptake ( VO2 ) , heart rate and perceived pain were measured . RESULTS MWD on the GTET increased significantly in the CER group compared with the CONT and UBST groups ( 93.9 + /- 79 % v. 7.0 + /- 19.8 % v. 7.3 + /- 46 % ; CER v. UBST v. CONT p = 0.003 ) . Similarly , peak VO2 increased with CER compared with the CONT and UBST groups ( 28.4 + /- 20 v. -6.2 + /- 15 v. -1.0 + /- 21 % ; CER v. UBST v. CONT p = 0.004 ) . During the SMWT the CER and UBST groups improved in PFWD compared with the CONT group ( 37 + /- 47 % v. 27 + /- 71 % v. -30 + /- 29 % ; CER v. UBST v. CONT p = 0.03 ) , and perceived pain decreased in the CER group compared with the UBST group ( -24 + /- 39 % v. 27 + /- 48 % ; CER v. UBST p = 0.01 ) . CONCLUSION CER improves physiological parameters and walking distances more than UBST does . CER is effective within 6 weeks . Verbal encouragement to exercise is an ineffective form of management
In claudication patients , SE is more effective than UE at improving maximal walking and claudication distances , yet there is no difference in general quality of life or patient-reported community-based walking .
BACKGROUND Supervised exercise ( SE ) is widely accepted as an effective therapy for intermittent claudication ( IC ) , but its use is limited by cost .
Unsupervised exercise ( UE ) represents a less costly alternative .
We assessed the comparative effectiveness of SE vs UE in patients with IC .