IATs improve intracanal cleanliness across a substantial portion of the canal , and therefore , their use is recommended throughout root canal preparation .
AIMS To establish whether irrigant activation techniques ( IATs ) result in greater intracanal smear layer and debris removal than conventional needle irrigation ( CNI ) .
Radiographic healing after a root canal treatment performed in single-rooted teeth with and without ultrasonic activation of the irrigant: a randomized controlled trial.
INTRODUCTION The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of a root canal treatment with and without additional ultrasonic activation of the irrigant . METHODS Single-rooted teeth with radiographic evidence of periapical bone loss were r and omly assigned to 2 treatment groups . In both groups syringe irrigation was performed , and in one group the irrigant was also activated by ultrasound . Ten to 19 months after treatment , the teeth were examined by using periapical radiography ( PA ) and cone-beam computed tomography ( CBCT ) . Area and volume of the periapical lesions were measured , and the outcome was presented in 4 categories : absence , reduction or enlargement of the radiolucency , or uncertain . Lesions were classified as reduced or enlarged when the change in size of the radiolucency was 20 % or more . RESULTS The recall rate was 82 % , and 84 teeth were analyzed . CBCT detected significantly more post-treatment lesions than PA ( P = .038 ) , but the percentages of absence and reduction of the radiolucency together revealed by CBCT and PA were similar ( P = .383 ) . The CBCT results showed that absence of the radiolucency was observed in 16 of 84 teeth ( 19 % ) and reduction of the radiolucency in 61 of 84 teeth ( 72.6 % ) , but there was no significant difference between the results of the 2 groups ( P = .470 ) . Absence and reduction of the radiolucency together were observed in the ultrasonic group in 39 of 41 teeth ( 95.1 % ) and in the syringe group in 38 of 43 teeth ( 88.4 % ) . CONCLUSIONS Root canal treatments with and without additional ultrasonic activation of the irrigant contributed equally to periapical healing
IATs improve intracanal cleanliness across a substantial portion of the canal , and therefore , their use is recommended throughout root canal preparation .
AIMS To establish whether irrigant activation techniques ( IATs ) result in greater intracanal smear layer and debris removal than conventional needle irrigation ( CNI ) .