AUTHORS ' CONCLUSIONS Very low quality evidence is available from single trials , thus we are uncertain if hip pre caution s with or without the addition of equipment and functional restrictions are effective in preventing dislocation and improving outcomes after THA .
BACKGROUND Total hip arthroplasty ( THA ) is one of the most common orthopaedic operations performed worldwide .
Painful osteoarthritis of the hip is the primary indication for THA .
Following THA , people have conventionally been provided with equipment , such as raised toilet seats and chairs , and educated to avoid activities that could cause the hip joint to be in a position of flexion over 90 degrees , or adduction or rotation past the midline .
These aspects of occupational therapy have been advocated to reduce the risks of prosthesis dislocation .
However , the appropriateness of these recommendations has been question ed .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of provision of assistive devices , education on hip pre caution s , environmental modifications and training in activities of daily living ( ADL ) and extended ADL ( EADL ) for people undergoing THA .
Reduced patient restrictions following total hip arthroplasty: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Background Total hip arthroplasty ( THA ) is a very common procedure in orthopedic surgery . In the Netherl and s , 25,642 primary THAs were performed in 2013 . Postoperative hip dislocation is one of the major complications and has been reported in 0.5 to 10.6 % of patients after primary THA.Several reports regarding the use of an anterolateral surgical approach have shown that a non-restriction or reduced restriction protocol does not increase the dislocation rate . For the posterolateral surgical approach it has been suggested that patient restrictions might be unnecessary but the amount of available literature is scarce . As such , r and omized controlled trials aim ed at investigating restrictions following THA using a posterior approach are strongly recommended . The aim of this prospect i ve r and omized controlled trial is to investigate the non-inferiority hypothesis concerning the early dislocation rate after THA in patients with and without the use of a reduced restriction protocol . Methods / Design After providing informed consent a group of 456 patients with symptomatic coxarthrosis will be r and omized to receive a THA either with care as usual , i.e. receiving postoperative restrictions including the advice to sleep in a supine position for the first 8 weeks postoperatively , or reduced restrictions with no recommendations regarding the position during sleeping . Primary outcome measure will be the percentage of early dislocations within the first 8 weeks after THA . Secondary outcome measures will be patient satisfaction , time to functional recovery , quality of sleep and patient ’s self-reported compliance with postoperative instructions . Discussion To our knowledge this will be the first r and omized controlled trial that compares a reduced restriction protocol with a restricted protocol following THA using a posterolateral surgical approach . Our hypothesis is that a reduced restriction protocol following THA with use of a posterolateral surgical approach has no influence on the early dislocation rate compared to a restricted protocol . Instead , embracing a reduced restriction protocol might even contribute to a higher quality of sleep , thereby facilitating a faster uptake and return to daily functions in patients after THA.Trial registration Clinical Trials.gov NCT02107248 , registration date 3 April 2014
AUTHORS ' CONCLUSIONS Very low quality evidence is available from single trials , thus we are uncertain if hip pre caution s with or without the addition of equipment and functional restrictions are effective in preventing dislocation and improving outcomes after THA .
BACKGROUND Total hip arthroplasty ( THA ) is one of the most common orthopaedic operations performed worldwide .
Painful osteoarthritis of the hip is the primary indication for THA .
Following THA , people have conventionally been provided with equipment , such as raised toilet seats and chairs , and educated to avoid activities that could cause the hip joint to be in a position of flexion over 90 degrees , or adduction or rotation past the midline .
These aspects of occupational therapy have been advocated to reduce the risks of prosthesis dislocation .
However , the appropriateness of these recommendations has been question ed .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of provision of assistive devices , education on hip pre caution s , environmental modifications and training in activities of daily living ( ADL ) and extended ADL ( EADL ) for people undergoing THA .