D. Restoration of sinus rhythm for monophasic vs. biphasic waveforms .
Another study showed that PVI result ed in long-term restoration
Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is a major public health problem in the United States .
More than 2.3 million Americans are estimated to have AF ( 1 ) .
The known association between AF and substantial mortality , morbidity , and health care costs compounds the effect of this condition .
Not only is the risk for death in patients with AF twice that of patients without it , but AF can result in myocardial ischemia and infa rct ion , exacerbate heart failure ( HF ) , and cause tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy if the ventricular rate is not well-controlled ( 25 ) .
The most dreaded complication of AF is thromboembolism , especially stroke ( 6 ) .
In some patients , AF or therapies to manage this condition can severely depreciate quality of life ( 710 ) .
Furthermore , the management of AF and its complications is responsible for nearly $ 16 billion in additional costs to the U.S. health care system per year ( 11 ) .
We conducted this systematic review to evaluate the comparative safety and effectiveness of rate- versus rhythm-control strategies ;  medications used for ventricular rate control ; strict versus more lenient rate-control strategies ; nonpharmacologic rate-control therapies  versus medications ; electrical cardioversion and antiarrhythmic medications  for restoration of sinus rhythm ;  and  catheter ablation , surgical ablation , and antiarrhythmic medications  for maintenance of sinus rhythm .
Recurrence of pulmonary vein conduction and atrial fibrillation after pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation: a randomized trial of the ostial versus the extraostial ablation strategy.
BACKGROUND Both segmental ostial and circumferential extraostial pulmonary vein ( PV ) isolation have been proven effective in the treatment of atrial fibrillation ( AF ) . However , the recurrence of AF and PV conduction after the 2 ablation strategies has never been compared in a r and omized study . METHODS A total of 100 consecutive patients ( age 56 + /- 10 ; 71 men ) with symptomatic AF ( paroxysmal , 51 ; persistent , 49 ) were r and omized to segmental ostial ( n = 54 ) or circumferential extraostial ( n = 46 ) PV isolation . A circular catheter positioned at the ostium of each target PV guided the ostial PV isolation . Extraostial PV isolation was performed by encircling the paired left and right PVs , respectively , guided by an electroanatomic mapping system . RESULTS A total of 84 % of the patients had recurrent AF after the first PV isolation procedure , showing 72 % with AF and 12 % with organized left atrial tachycardia . In patients undergoing reablation , all but 2 patients had recurrence of left atrium PV conduction ( > 95 % ) . During a mean follow-up of 12 months without antiarrhythmic medication , 57 % of patients who underwent extraostial PV isolation were free of arrhythmia symptoms compared with 31 % of patients who underwent ostial PV isolation ( P < .05 ) . This difference in success rate between the 2 ablation strategies was mainly seen in patients known with persistent AF ( 52 % and 15 % , respectively ; P = .02 ) as opposed to patients with paroxysmal AF ( 65 % and 46 % , respectively ; P = .26 ) . CONCLUSIONS Overall , the more proximal , extraostial PV isolation was found to be superior to ostial PV isolation , especially in patients known with persistent AF . A high recurrence rate of 84 % after a single complete PV isolation procedure was seen . At reablation , more than 95 % had recurrence of left atrium PV conduction regardless of the procedure used , supporting the idea that complete PV isolation seems essential to prevent arrhythmia recurrences
D. Restoration of sinus rhythm for monophasic vs. biphasic waveforms .
Another study showed that PVI result ed in long-term restoration
Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is a major public health problem in the United States .
More than 2.3 million Americans are estimated to have AF ( 1 ) .
The known association between AF and substantial mortality , morbidity , and health care costs compounds the effect of this condition .
Not only is the risk for death in patients with AF twice that of patients without it , but AF can result in myocardial ischemia and infa rct ion , exacerbate heart failure ( HF ) , and cause tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy if the ventricular rate is not well-controlled ( 25 ) .
The most dreaded complication of AF is thromboembolism , especially stroke ( 6 ) .
In some patients , AF or therapies to manage this condition can severely depreciate quality of life ( 710 ) .
Furthermore , the management of AF and its complications is responsible for nearly $ 16 billion in additional costs to the U.S. health care system per year ( 11 ) .
We conducted this systematic review to evaluate the comparative safety and effectiveness of rate- versus rhythm-control strategies ;  medications used for ventricular rate control ; strict versus more lenient rate-control strategies ; nonpharmacologic rate-control therapies  versus medications ; electrical cardioversion and antiarrhythmic medications  for restoration of sinus rhythm ;  and  catheter ablation , surgical ablation , and antiarrhythmic medications  for maintenance of sinus rhythm .