When each device is compared incrementally , BioMonitor 2-AF dominates Reveal LINQ and Confirm RX .
BACKGROUND Cryptogenic stroke is a stroke for which no cause is identified after st and ard diagnostic tests .
Long-term implantable cardiac monitors may be better at diagnosing atrial fibrillation and provide an opportunity to reduce the risk of stroke recurrence with anticoagulants .
OBJECTIVES The objectives were to assess the diagnostic test accuracy , clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of three implantable monitors [ BioMonitor 2-AF ™ ( Biotronik SE & Co. KG , Berlin , Germany ) , Confirm Rx ™ ( Abbott Laboratories , Lake Bluff , IL , USA ) and Reveal LINQ ™ ( Medtronic plc , Minneapolis , MN , USA ) ] in patients who have had a cryptogenic stroke and for whom no atrial fibrillation is detected after 24 hours of external electrocardiographic monitoring .
The BioMonitor 2 insertable cardiac monitor: Clinical experience with a novel implantable cardiac monitor.
INTRODUCTION Implantable loop recorders ( ILR ) are leadless subcutaneous devices that allow cardiac monitoring for up to 3 years and are a valuable tool in the diagnosis of arrhythmias , cryptogenic stroke and unexplained syncope . The Biotronik BioMonitor 2 is a novel , insertable ILR allowing long-term continuous monitoring with wireless telemetry options . METHODS A single-center , prospect i ve , observational study investigating the reliability of sensing quality and detection performance in the BioMonitor 2 ILR , as well as post-implantation patient satisfaction . R-wave amplitude was recorded immediately post implantation and 1 day post implantation , followed by extensive patient instruction . Follow-up was scheduled after 3 months , or after an event . Data from the ILR were retrieved , with documentation of all episodes , R-wave amplitude and noise burden . The anatomical position of the ILR was determined 1 day post implantation and after 3 months . A patient question naire was conducted after 3 months . RESULTS 30 consecutive patients ( mean age 71 ± 12 years , 56 % male ) were analyzed . Indications for ILR implantation were : unexplained syncope ( n = 24 , 80 % ) , suspected atrial fibrillation ( n = 4 , 13 % ) , cryptogenic stroke ( n = 1 , 3 % ) and palpitations ( n = 1 , 3 % ) . Median time from skin cut to suture was 8 min . No complications occurred . Mean R-wave amplitude at implantation was 0.84 ± 0.32 mV , at day 1 post implantation 0.96 ± 0.31 mV , and after a mean follow-up of 85 ± 24 days 1.02 ± 0.47 mV ( p = 0.01 ) . The mean noise burden was 1.4 ± 2 % . CONCLUSION Implantation of the novel BioMonitor 2 ILR is fast and uncomplicated . Initial sensing values are good and improve over time
When each device is compared incrementally , BioMonitor 2-AF dominates Reveal LINQ and Confirm RX .
BACKGROUND Cryptogenic stroke is a stroke for which no cause is identified after st and ard diagnostic tests .
Long-term implantable cardiac monitors may be better at diagnosing atrial fibrillation and provide an opportunity to reduce the risk of stroke recurrence with anticoagulants .
OBJECTIVES The objectives were to assess the diagnostic test accuracy , clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of three implantable monitors [ BioMonitor 2-AF ™ ( Biotronik SE & Co. KG , Berlin , Germany ) , Confirm Rx ™ ( Abbott Laboratories , Lake Bluff , IL , USA ) and Reveal LINQ ™ ( Medtronic plc , Minneapolis , MN , USA ) ] in patients who have had a cryptogenic stroke and for whom no atrial fibrillation is detected after 24 hours of external electrocardiographic monitoring .