The effects of delayed BP lowering treatment on long-term all-cause and CVD mortality did not vary with baseline risk of CVD .
The review showed no clinical ly adverse ‘ legacy effect ’ on mortality or major CVD event from not treating middle-aged adults at a systolic BP threshold of 140 mmHg or over .
Although these studies are non-r and omised post-hoc analyses , they may allay concerns that early treatment of elevated systolic BP is necessary to prevent CVD events in primary prevention population
To investigate if there is evidence for a ‘ legacy effect ’ for blood pressure ( BP ) lowering treatment , that is , worse health outcomes from not initiating drug treatment at a systolic BP threshold of 140 mmHg in middle-age adults .
Effectiveness of blood pressure-lowering drug treatment by levels of absolute risk: post hoc analysis of the Australian National Blood Pressure Study
Objectives In many current guidelines , blood pressure (BP)-lowering drug treatment for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease ( CVD ) is based on absolute risk . However , in clinical practice , therapeutic decisions are often based on BP levels alone . We sought to investigate which approach was superior by conducting a post hoc analysis of the Australian National Blood Pressure ( ANBP ) cohort , a seminal study establishing the efficacy of BP lowering in ‘ mild hypertensive ’ persons . Design A post hoc subgroup analysis of the ANBP trial results by baseline absolute risk tertile . Setting and participants 3244 participants aged 35–69 years in a community-based r and omised placebo controlled trial of blood pressure-lowering medication . Interventions Chlorothiazide500 mg versus placebo . Primary outcome measures All-cause mortality and non-fatal events ( non-fatal CVD , congestive cardiac failure , renal failure , hypertensive retinopathy or encephalopathy ) . Results Treatment effects were assessed by HR , absolute risk reduction and number needed to treat . Participants had an average 5-year CVD risk in the intermediate range ( 10.5±6.5 ) with moderately elevated BP ( mean 159/103 mmHg ) and were middle aged ( 52±8 years ) . In a subgroup analysis , the relative effects ( HR ) and absolute effects ( absolute risk reduction and number needed to treat ) did not statistically differ across the three risk groups except for the absolute benefit in all-cause mortality ( p for heterogeneity=0.04 ) . With respect to absolute benefit , drug treatment significantly reduced the number of events in the high-risk group regarding any event with a number needed to treat of 18 ( 10 to 64 ) , death from any cause with 45 ( 25 to 196 ) and major CVD events with 23 ( 12 to 193 ) . Conclusion Our analysis confirms that the benefit of treatment was substantial only in the high-risk tertile , reaffirming the rationale of treating elevated blood pressure in the setting of all risk factors rather than in isolation
The effects of delayed BP lowering treatment on long-term all-cause and CVD mortality did not vary with baseline risk of CVD .
The review showed no clinical ly adverse ‘ legacy effect ’ on mortality or major CVD event from not treating middle-aged adults at a systolic BP threshold of 140 mmHg or over .
Although these studies are non-r and omised post-hoc analyses , they may allay concerns that early treatment of elevated systolic BP is necessary to prevent CVD events in primary prevention population
To investigate if there is evidence for a ‘ legacy effect ’ for blood pressure ( BP ) lowering treatment , that is , worse health outcomes from not initiating drug treatment at a systolic BP threshold of 140 mmHg in middle-age adults .