Educational interventions did not seem to have a positive impact on HbA1c , systolic blood pressure or lipid profiles .
The use of telemedicine , clinician reminders and feedback showed mixed results but there was a level of consistency in improvement in HbA1c when multifaceted interventions on multidisciplinary teams were implemented .
Targeting general or family physicians was largely ineffective in improving the cardiovascular risk factors considered , except when using a computer application on insulin h and ling of type 2 diabetes or customised simulated cases with feedbacks .
Similarly , interventions targeting nurses did not improve outcomes compared to st and ard care .
Multifaceted professional interventions were more effective than single interventions targeting single primary or community care professionals in improving glycaemic control
OBJECTIVE To review the interventions targeting primary care or community based professionals on glycaemic and cardiovascular risk factor control in people with diabetes .
Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate Effectiveness of Registered Dietitian–Led Diabetes Management on Glycemic and Diet Control in a Primary Care Setting in Taiwan
OBJECTIVE In this r and omized controlled trial we evaluated the effect of registered dietitian – led management of diabetes on glycemic control and macronutrient intake in type 2 diabetic patients in primary care clinics in Taiwan and studied the association between changes in macronutrient intake and glycemic measures . RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We recruited 154 adult patients with type 2 diabetes and r and omly assigned them to a routine care control group ( n = 79 ) or a registered dietitian – led intervention group ( n = 75 ) who received on-site diabetic self-management education every 3 months over 12 months . RESULTS Over the 1-year period , neither the intervention group ( n = 75 ) nor the control group ( n = 79 ) had significant changes in A1C , whereas the intervention patients with poorly controlled baseline A1C ( ≥7 % ) ( n = 56 ) had significantly greater improvements in A1C and fasting plasma glucose than the control subjects ( n = 60 ) ( −0.7 vs. −0.2 % , P = 0.034 ; −13.4 vs. 16.9 mg/dl , P = 0.007 ) during the same period . We also found significant net intervention-control group differences in overall energy intake ( −229.06 ± 309.16 vs. 56.10 ± 309.41 kcal/day ) and carbohydrate intake ( −31.24 ± 61.53 vs. 7.15 ± 54.09 g/day ) ( P < 0.001 ) in patients with poorly controlled A1C . Multivariable adjusted modeling revealed an independent association between changes in carbohydrate intake and A1C in the intervention group ( n = 56 ; β = 0.10 , SEM = 0.033 , P = 0.004 ) . CONCLUSIONS On-site registered dietitian – led management of diabetes can improve glycemic control in patients with poorly managed type 2 diabetes in primary care clinics in Taiwan . A reduction in carbohydrate intake may improve glycemic status
Educational interventions did not seem to have a positive impact on HbA1c , systolic blood pressure or lipid profiles .
The use of telemedicine , clinician reminders and feedback showed mixed results but there was a level of consistency in improvement in HbA1c when multifaceted interventions on multidisciplinary teams were implemented .
Targeting general or family physicians was largely ineffective in improving the cardiovascular risk factors considered , except when using a computer application on insulin h and ling of type 2 diabetes or customised simulated cases with feedbacks .
Similarly , interventions targeting nurses did not improve outcomes compared to st and ard care .
Multifaceted professional interventions were more effective than single interventions targeting single primary or community care professionals in improving glycaemic control
OBJECTIVE To review the interventions targeting primary care or community based professionals on glycaemic and cardiovascular risk factor control in people with diabetes .