We found no evidence to support short-term or prolonged feeding with a hydrolysed formula compared with exclusive breast feeding for prevention of allergic disease .
Very low- quality evidence indicates that short-term use of an EHF compared with a CMF may prevent infant CMA .
Further trials are recommended before implementation of this practice .We found no evidence to support prolonged feeding with a hydrolysed formula compared with a CMF for prevention of allergic disease in infants unable to be exclusively breast fed
BACKGROUND Infant formulas containing hydrolysed proteins have been widely advocated for preventing allergic disease in infants , in place of st and ard cow 's milk formula ( CMF ) .
However , it is unclear whether the clinical trial evidence supports this .
OBJECTIVES To compare effects on allergic disease when infants are fed a hydrolysed formula versus CMF or human breast milk .
If hydrolysed formulas are effective , to determine what type of hydrolysed formula is most effective , including extensively or partially hydrolysed formula ( EHF/PHF ) .
To determine whether infants at low or high risk of allergic disease , and whether infants receiving early short-term ( first few days after birth ) or prolonged formula feeding benefit from hydrolysed formulas .
Effectiveness of massage, sucrose solution, herbal tea or hydrolysed formula in the treatment of infantile colic.
AIM AND OBJECTIVE The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of massage , sucrose solution , herbal tea or hydrolysed formula , each used individually in the treatment of infantile colic . BACKGROUND The term colic describes a group of symptoms that occur frequently in infants , consisting of paroxysmal abdominal pain and severe crying . Infant colic is of importance for both parents and the community health services that provide families with care , and is therefore an important clinical problem that is amenable to nursing interventions . DESIGN This prospect i ve and r and omised-controlled study involved 175 infants in Turkey . METHODS Data were gathered by using Wessel criteria ; parents wrote a daily structured diary , recording the onset and duration of crying . Patients were assigned r and omly into four different intervention groups ( massage , sucrose solution , herbal tea and hydrolysed formula ) and control group .  Duration of crying following each intervention was recorded in the diary by parents for a one week period . RESULTS There was a significant reduction in crying hours per day in all intervention groups . The difference between mean duration of total crying ( hours/day ) before and after the intervention infants in hydrolysed formula group was found higher than massage , sucrose and herbal tea group . The difference between mean duration of total crying(hours/day ) before and after the intervention infants in massage group was found lower than other intervention groups and all groups . CONCLUSION Our findings demonstrated that varied interventions such as administration of massage , sucrose solution , herbal tea and hydrolysed formula are effective in the treatment of colic . The difference between mean duration of total crying ( hours/day ) before and after the intervention in hydrolysed formula group was found higher than other intervention groups . Hydrolysed formula was the most effective in reducing the duration of crying ( hours/day ) when compared with the other intervention groups . Massage intervention yielded the least symptomatic improvement among all the interventions . RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE Colic treatment models used in this study can be used by nurses in neonatal and primary healthcare setting s as an aid to families for the treatment of infantile colic
We found no evidence to support short-term or prolonged feeding with a hydrolysed formula compared with exclusive breast feeding for prevention of allergic disease .
Very low- quality evidence indicates that short-term use of an EHF compared with a CMF may prevent infant CMA .
Further trials are recommended before implementation of this practice .We found no evidence to support prolonged feeding with a hydrolysed formula compared with a CMF for prevention of allergic disease in infants unable to be exclusively breast fed
BACKGROUND Infant formulas containing hydrolysed proteins have been widely advocated for preventing allergic disease in infants , in place of st and ard cow 's milk formula ( CMF ) .
However , it is unclear whether the clinical trial evidence supports this .
OBJECTIVES To compare effects on allergic disease when infants are fed a hydrolysed formula versus CMF or human breast milk .
If hydrolysed formulas are effective , to determine what type of hydrolysed formula is most effective , including extensively or partially hydrolysed formula ( EHF/PHF ) .
To determine whether infants at low or high risk of allergic disease , and whether infants receiving early short-term ( first few days after birth ) or prolonged formula feeding benefit from hydrolysed formulas .