Based on improvement of mean International Prostate Symptom Score and quality of life scores , the effectiveness of the newer ABs was not different from the older ABs ( moderate strength of evidence [ SOE ] ) , but had more AEs ( low SOE ) .
Antimuscarinics/AB combination therapy had similar outcomes  as AB monotherapy ( all moderate SOE ) , but often had more AEs .
Phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors alone or in combination with ABs had similar or inferior outcomes than ABs alone .
Evidence was insufficient for the beta-3 adrenoceptor agonist .
For all newer agents , the evidence was generally insufficient to assess long-term efficacy , prevention of symptom progression , or AEs .
None of the drugs or drug combinations newly used to treat LUTS attributed to BPH showed outcomes superior to traditional AB treatment .
Given the lack of superior outcomes , the studies ' short time-horizon , and less assurance of their safety , their current value in treating LUTS attributable to BPH appears low .
We found none of the new drugs to be better but there was more concern about side effects
CONTEXT Alpha-blockers ( ABs ) and 5-alpha reductase inhibitors have an established role in treating male lower urinary tract symptoms ( LUTS ) attributed to benign prostatic hyperplasia ( BPH ) .
Recently , newer drugs have shown promise for this indication .
OBJECTIVE To assess the comparative effectiveness and adverse effects ( AEs ) of newer drugs to treat LUTS attributed to BPH through a systematic review and meta- analysis .
PATIENT SUMMARY In this paper , we review ed the evidence of newer drugs to treat men with urinary problems attributable to an enlarged prostate .
Efficacy and safety of combined oral therapy with tadalafil and alfuzosin: an integrated approach to the management of patients with lower urinary tract symptoms and erectile dysfunction. Preliminary report.
INTRODUCTION Alpha1-blockers ( AB ) are the first-line monotherapy for lower urinary tract symptoms ( LUTS ) .  Phosphodiesterase type 5 ( PDE5 ) inhibitors are the first-line treatment for erectile dysfunction ( ED ) . Numerous studies have supposed a significant association between ED and LUTS , but a causal relationship can not be established . AIM The aim was to evaluate the efficacy of a combined therapy with an AB ( alfuzosin ) and PDE5 inhibitors ( tadalafil ) in patients with LUTS and ED . METHODS This was a r and omized , open-label , three-arm study . A total of 66 men complaining of ED and LUTS were included in the study . Patients were assessed at baseline and after 12 weeks of study treatment , and then underwent r and omized allocation to either alfuzosin 10 mg once a day ( 22 patients ) or tadalafil 20 mg on alternative days ( 21 patients ) , or a combination of both ( 23 patients ) . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES All participants completed the erectile function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function ( IIEF-EF ) and the International Prostatic Symptom Score ( IPSS ) . Other efficacy variables included maximum urinary flow rate ( Qmax ) and medium urinary flow rate ( Qave ) . RESULTS IIEF-EF tended to improve with alfuzosin alone ( + 15 % ) , while it was clearly improved with tadalafil alone ( + 36.3 % ) . The greatest improvement was experienced with the combination therapy ( + 37.6 % ) . Improvement in Qmax was observed in all groups , but patients receiving combination therapy had greater improvement ( 29.6 % ) than patients receiving either only alfuzosin ( 21.7 % ) or only tadalafil ( 9.5 % ) . IPSS was significantly improved in alfuzosin group ( 27.2 % ) , was more marked with the combination therapy ( 41.6 % ) , and a small increase , although not significant , was also observed with tadalafil ( 8.4 % ) . CONCLUSIONS Combined therapy improved ED and LUTS as demonstrated by the significant improvement in uroflowmetry measures and in IPSS and IIEF-EF scores . A significant improvement was also observed in quality of life assessment s. The beneficial effects of tadalafil on LUTS similar to the benefits of alfuzosin on ED , although present , were smaller
Based on improvement of mean International Prostate Symptom Score and quality of life scores , the effectiveness of the newer ABs was not different from the older ABs ( moderate strength of evidence [ SOE ] ) , but had more AEs ( low SOE ) .
Antimuscarinics/AB combination therapy had similar outcomes  as AB monotherapy ( all moderate SOE ) , but often had more AEs .
Phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors alone or in combination with ABs had similar or inferior outcomes than ABs alone .
Evidence was insufficient for the beta-3 adrenoceptor agonist .
For all newer agents , the evidence was generally insufficient to assess long-term efficacy , prevention of symptom progression , or AEs .
None of the drugs or drug combinations newly used to treat LUTS attributed to BPH showed outcomes superior to traditional AB treatment .
Given the lack of superior outcomes , the studies ' short time-horizon , and less assurance of their safety , their current value in treating LUTS attributable to BPH appears low .
We found none of the new drugs to be better but there was more concern about side effects
CONTEXT Alpha-blockers ( ABs ) and 5-alpha reductase inhibitors have an established role in treating male lower urinary tract symptoms ( LUTS ) attributed to benign prostatic hyperplasia ( BPH ) .
Recently , newer drugs have shown promise for this indication .
OBJECTIVE To assess the comparative effectiveness and adverse effects ( AEs ) of newer drugs to treat LUTS attributed to BPH through a systematic review and meta- analysis .
PATIENT SUMMARY In this paper , we review ed the evidence of newer drugs to treat men with urinary problems attributable to an enlarged prostate .