The DASH , the  Michigan H and Outcomes Question naire ( MHQ ) , the  Patient Evaluation Measure ( PEM ) , and the  Patient-Reported Wrist Evaluation ( PRWE ) had evidence supporting their reliability , validity , and responsiveness .
A post-hoc review of excluded studies revealed the AUSCAN Osteoarthritis H and Index as another suitable instrument that had favourable reliability , validity , and responsiveness .
The DASH , MHQ , and AUSCAN Osteoarthritis H and Index instruments were supported by the most favourable empirical evidence for validity , reliability , and responsiveness .
The PEM and PRWE also had favourable empirical evidence reported for these elements .
This paper aim ed to identify condition-specific patient-reported outcome measures used in clinical trials among people with wrist osteoarthritis and summarise empirical peer- review ed evidence supporting their reliability , validity , and responsiveness to change .
Reliability and Validity Testing of the SF-36 Questionnaire for the Evaluation of the Quality of Life of Chinese Urban Construction Workers
The quality of life ( QOL ) of the Chinese ‘ floating ’ migrant population is of growing concern . Urban construction workers are the main migrant population in China , but there is little published research on their QOL . The reliability and validity of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey ( SF-36 ) question naire were assessed by conducting a population -based study of migrant construction workers in Shenyang , China . Two construction sites were r and omly selected from each of the five districts of Shenyang City and 1200 copies of the question naire were distributed to rurally-registered , non-Shenyang workers aged ≥ 16 years at these sites . A total of 1125 question naires were evaluated . The overall Cronbach 's a coefficient of the SF-36 question naire was 0.821 while the respective Cronbach 's α coefficient for each dimension was > 0.70 . Results showed that the SF-36 question naire demonstrated good reliability and validity , and that it can be used to measure QOL among Chinese migrant urban construction workers
The DASH , the  Michigan H and Outcomes Question naire ( MHQ ) , the  Patient Evaluation Measure ( PEM ) , and the  Patient-Reported Wrist Evaluation ( PRWE ) had evidence supporting their reliability , validity , and responsiveness .
A post-hoc review of excluded studies revealed the AUSCAN Osteoarthritis H and Index as another suitable instrument that had favourable reliability , validity , and responsiveness .
The DASH , MHQ , and AUSCAN Osteoarthritis H and Index instruments were supported by the most favourable empirical evidence for validity , reliability , and responsiveness .
The PEM and PRWE also had favourable empirical evidence reported for these elements .
This paper aim ed to identify condition-specific patient-reported outcome measures used in clinical trials among people with wrist osteoarthritis and summarise empirical peer- review ed evidence supporting their reliability , validity , and responsiveness to change .