RESULTS Studies of task-related training showed benefits for functional outcome compared with traditional therapies .
Active use of task-oriented training with stroke survivors will lead to improvements in functional outcomes and overall health-related quality of life .
CONCLUSION Generally , task-oriented rehabilitation proved to be more effective .
Many interventions are feasible for nurses and can be performed in a ward or at home .
AIM This paper is a report of a review conducted to provide an overview of the evidence in the literature on task-oriented training of stroke survivors and its relevance in daily nursing practice .
BACKGROUND Stroke is the second leading cause of death and one of the leading causes of adult disability in the Western world .
The use of neurodevelopmental treatment in the daily nursing care of stroke survivors does not improve clinical outcomes .
Nurses are therefore exploring other forms of rehabilitation intervention , including task-oriented rehabilitation .
Despite the growing number of studies showing evidence on task-oriented interventions , recommendations for daily nursing practice are lacking .
Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial.
CONTEXT Single-site studies suggest that a 2-week program of constraint-induced movement therapy ( CIMT ) for patients more than 1 year after stroke who maintain some h and and wrist movement can improve upper extremity function that persists for at least 1 year . OBJECTIVE To compare the effects of a 2-week multisite program of CIMT vs usual and customary care on improvement in upper extremity function among patients who had a first stroke within the previous 3 to 9 months . DESIGN AND SETTING The Extremity Constraint Induced Therapy Evaluation ( EXCITE ) trial , a prospect i ve , single-blind , r and omized , multisite clinical trial conducted at 7 US academic institutions between January 2001 and January 2003 . PARTICIPANTS Two hundred twenty-two individuals with predominantly ischemic stroke . INTERVENTIONS Participants were assigned to receive either CIMT ( n = 106 ; wearing a restraining mitt on the less-affected h and while engaging in repetitive task practice and behavioral shaping with the hemiplegic h and ) or usual and customary care ( n = 116 ; ranging from no treatment after concluding formal rehabilitation to pharmacologic or physiotherapeutic interventions ) ; patients were stratified by sex , prestroke dominant side , side of stroke , and level of paretic arm function . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The Wolf Motor Function Test ( WMFT ) , a measure of laboratory time and strength-based ability and quality of movement ( functional ability ) , and the Motor Activity Log ( MAL ) , a measure of how well and how often 30 common daily activities are performed . RESULTS From baseline to 12 months , the CIMT group showed greater improvements than the control group in both the WMFT Performance Time ( decrease in mean time from 19.3 seconds to 9.3 seconds [ 52 % reduction ] vs from 24.0 seconds to 17.7 seconds [ 26 % reduction ] ; between-group difference , 34 % [ 95 % confidence interval { CI } , 12%-51 % ] ; P<.001 ) and in the MAL Amount of Use ( on a 0 - 5 scale , increase from 1.21 to 2.13 vs from 1.15 to 1.65 ; between-group difference , 0.43 [ 95 % CI , 0.05 - 0.80 ] ; P<.001 ) and MAL Quality of Movement ( on a 0 - 5 scale , increase from 1.26 to 2.23 vs 1.18 to 1.66 ; between-group difference , 0.48 [ 95 % CI , 0.13 - 0.84 ] ; P<.001 ) . The CIMT group achieved a decrease of 19.5 in self-perceived h and function difficulty ( Stroke Impact Scale h and domain ) vs a decrease of 10.1 for the control group ( between-group difference , 9.42 [ 95 % CI , 0.27 - 18.57 ] ; P=.05 ) . CONCLUSION Among patients who had a stroke within the previous 3 to 9 months , CIMT produced statistically significant and clinical ly relevant improvements in arm motor function that persisted for at least 1 year . Trial Registration clinical trials.gov Identifier : NCT00057018
RESULTS Studies of task-related training showed benefits for functional outcome compared with traditional therapies .
Active use of task-oriented training with stroke survivors will lead to improvements in functional outcomes and overall health-related quality of life .
CONCLUSION Generally , task-oriented rehabilitation proved to be more effective .
Many interventions are feasible for nurses and can be performed in a ward or at home .
AIM This paper is a report of a review conducted to provide an overview of the evidence in the literature on task-oriented training of stroke survivors and its relevance in daily nursing practice .
BACKGROUND Stroke is the second leading cause of death and one of the leading causes of adult disability in the Western world .
The use of neurodevelopmental treatment in the daily nursing care of stroke survivors does not improve clinical outcomes .
Nurses are therefore exploring other forms of rehabilitation intervention , including task-oriented rehabilitation .
Despite the growing number of studies showing evidence on task-oriented interventions , recommendations for daily nursing practice are lacking .