D. Restoration of sinus rhythm for monophasic vs. biphasic waveforms .
Another study showed that PVI result ed in long-term restoration
Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is a major public health problem in the United States .
More than 2.3 million Americans are estimated to have AF ( 1 ) .
The known association between AF and substantial mortality , morbidity , and health care costs compounds the effect of this condition .
Not only is the risk for death in patients with AF twice that of patients without it , but AF can result in myocardial ischemia and infa rct ion , exacerbate heart failure ( HF ) , and cause tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy if the ventricular rate is not well-controlled ( 25 ) .
The most dreaded complication of AF is thromboembolism , especially stroke ( 6 ) .
In some patients , AF or therapies to manage this condition can severely depreciate quality of life ( 710 ) .
Furthermore , the management of AF and its complications is responsible for nearly $ 16 billion in additional costs to the U.S. health care system per year ( 11 ) .
We conducted this systematic review to evaluate the comparative safety and effectiveness of rate- versus rhythm-control strategies ;  medications used for ventricular rate control ; strict versus more lenient rate-control strategies ; nonpharmacologic rate-control therapies  versus medications ; electrical cardioversion and antiarrhythmic medications  for restoration of sinus rhythm ;  and  catheter ablation , surgical ablation , and antiarrhythmic medications  for maintenance of sinus rhythm .
Comparison of cardiac surgery with left atrial surgical ablation vs. cardiac surgery without atrial ablation in patients with coronary and/or valvular heart disease plus atrial fibrillation: final results of the PRAGUE-12 randomized multicentre study†
Aims Surgical ablation procedure can restore sinus rhythm ( SR ) in patients with atrial fibrillation ( AF ) undergoing cardiac surgery . However , it is not known whether it has any impact on long-term clinical outcomes . Methods and results This multicentre study r and omized 224 patients with AF scheduled for valve and /or coronary surgery : group A  ( left atrial surgical ablation , n = 117 ) vs. group B  ( no ablation , n = 107 ) . The primary efficacy outcome was the SR presence ( without any AF episode ) during a 24 h electrocardiogram ( ECG )  after 1 year . The primary safety outcome was the combined endpoint of death/myocardial infa rct ion/stroke/renal failure at 30 days . A Holter-ECG after 1 year revealed SR in 60.2 % of group A patients vs. 35.5 % in group B ( P = 0.002 ) . The combined safety endpoint at 30 days occurred in 10.3 % ( group A ) vs. 14.7 % ( group B , P = 0.411 ) . All-cause 1-year mortality was 16.2 % ( A ) vs. 17.4 % ( B , P = 0.800 ) . Stroke occurred in 2.7 % ( A ) vs. 4.3 % ( B ) patients ( P = 0.319 ) . No difference ( A vs. B ) in SR was found among patients with paroxysmal ( 61.9 vs. 58.3 % ) or persistent ( 72 vs. 50 % ) AF , but ablation significantly increased SR prevalence in patients with longst and ing persistent AF ( 53.2 vs. 13.9 % , P < 0.001 ) . Conclusion Surgical ablation improves the likelihood of SR presence post-operatively without increasing peri-operative complications . However , the higher prevalence of SR did not translate to improved clinical outcomes at 1 year . Further follow-ups ( e.g. 5-year ) are warranted to show any potential clinical benefit which might occur later
D. Restoration of sinus rhythm for monophasic vs. biphasic waveforms .
Another study showed that PVI result ed in long-term restoration
Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is a major public health problem in the United States .
More than 2.3 million Americans are estimated to have AF ( 1 ) .
The known association between AF and substantial mortality , morbidity , and health care costs compounds the effect of this condition .
Not only is the risk for death in patients with AF twice that of patients without it , but AF can result in myocardial ischemia and infa rct ion , exacerbate heart failure ( HF ) , and cause tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy if the ventricular rate is not well-controlled ( 25 ) .
The most dreaded complication of AF is thromboembolism , especially stroke ( 6 ) .
In some patients , AF or therapies to manage this condition can severely depreciate quality of life ( 710 ) .
Furthermore , the management of AF and its complications is responsible for nearly $ 16 billion in additional costs to the U.S. health care system per year ( 11 ) .
We conducted this systematic review to evaluate the comparative safety and effectiveness of rate- versus rhythm-control strategies ;  medications used for ventricular rate control ; strict versus more lenient rate-control strategies ; nonpharmacologic rate-control therapies  versus medications ; electrical cardioversion and antiarrhythmic medications  for restoration of sinus rhythm ;  and  catheter ablation , surgical ablation , and antiarrhythmic medications  for maintenance of sinus rhythm .