A significant positive effect of the interventions on weight was reported by all study types .
The meta- analysis showed that lifestyle interventions achieved weight and waist circumference reductions after one year .
However , no clear effects on biochemical or clinical parameters were observed , possibly due to short follow-up periods or lack of power of the studies meta-analysed .
Changes in dietary parameters or physical activity were generally not reported .
Most studies assessing feasibility were supportive of implementation of lifestyle interventions in routine clinical care .
Conclusion Lifestyle interventions for patients at high risk of diabetes , delivered by a variety of healthcare providers in routine clinical setting s , are feasible but appear to be of limited clinical benefit one year after intervention .
Despite convincing evidence from structured intensive trials , this systematic review showed that translation into routine practice has less effect on diabetes risk reduction
Background The clinical effectiveness of intensive lifestyle interventions in preventing or delaying diabetes in people at high risk has been established from r and omised trials of structured , intensive interventions conducted in several countries over the past two decades .
The challenge is to translate them into routine clinical setting s. The objective of this review is to determine whether lifestyle interventions delivered to high-risk adult patients in routine clinical care setting s are feasible and effective in achieving reductions in risk factors for diabetes .
Randomised controlled trial evaluating lifestyle interventions in people with impaired glucose tolerance.
AIM To evaluate the effectiveness of lifestyle interventions in people with impaired glucose tolerance ( IGT ) . METHODS Participants with IGT ( n=78 ) , diagnosed on two consecutive oral glucose tolerance tests ( OGTTs ) , were r and omly assigned to a 2-year lifestyle intervention or to a control group . Main outcome measures were changes from baseline in : nutrient intake ; physical activity ; anthropometry , glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity . Measurements were repeated at 6 , 12 and 24 months follow-up . RESULTS After 24 months follow-up , there was a significant fall in total fat consumption ( difference in change between groups ( Delta intervention-Delta control)= -17.9 , 95 % confidence interval ( CI ) -33.6 to -2.1g/day ) as a result of the intervention . Body mass was significantly lower in the intervention group compared with controls after 6 months ( -1.6 , 95 % CI -2.9 to -0.4 kg ) and 24 months ( -3.3 , 95 % CI -5.7 to -0.89 kg ) . Whole body insulin sensitivity , assessed by the short insulin tolerance test ( ITT ) , improved after 12 months in the intervention group ( 0.52 , 95 % CI 0.15 - 0.89%/min ) . CONCLUSIONS These findings complement the findings of the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study and the American Diabetes Prevention Study , both of which tested intensive interventions , by showing that pragmatic lifestyle interventions result in improvements in obesity and whole body insulin sensitivity in individuals with IGT , without change in other cardiovascular risk factors
A significant positive effect of the interventions on weight was reported by all study types .
The meta- analysis showed that lifestyle interventions achieved weight and waist circumference reductions after one year .
However , no clear effects on biochemical or clinical parameters were observed , possibly due to short follow-up periods or lack of power of the studies meta-analysed .
Changes in dietary parameters or physical activity were generally not reported .
Most studies assessing feasibility were supportive of implementation of lifestyle interventions in routine clinical care .
Conclusion Lifestyle interventions for patients at high risk of diabetes , delivered by a variety of healthcare providers in routine clinical setting s , are feasible but appear to be of limited clinical benefit one year after intervention .
Despite convincing evidence from structured intensive trials , this systematic review showed that translation into routine practice has less effect on diabetes risk reduction
Background The clinical effectiveness of intensive lifestyle interventions in preventing or delaying diabetes in people at high risk has been established from r and omised trials of structured , intensive interventions conducted in several countries over the past two decades .
The challenge is to translate them into routine clinical setting s. The objective of this review is to determine whether lifestyle interventions delivered to high-risk adult patients in routine clinical care setting s are feasible and effective in achieving reductions in risk factors for diabetes .