On the CGI-I scale , the analysis revealed that MPH was more effective than ATX and GXR .
For any adverse events , RBX ( 89 % ) was the safest alternative .
Network meta- analysis offered a broader overview on the available treatments for ADHD , especially for safety issues , and contributes towards evidence gathering and clinical practice decisions .
The aim of this study is to gather evidence of head-to-head double-blind r and omized-controlled trials on the efficacy and safety of available treatments for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder ( ADHD ) in children and adolescents .
Amantadine versus methylphenidate in children and adolescents with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a randomized, double-blind trial.
OBJECTIVE The aim of the present study was to further evaluate , under double blind and controlled conditions , the efficacy of amantadine for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder ( ADHD ) in children and adolescents as compared to methylpheni date . METHODS This was a 6-week r and omized clinical trial . Forty patients ( 28 boys and 12 girls ) with a DSM-IV-TR diagnosis of ADHD were the study population of this trial . All study subjects were r and omly assigned to receive the treatment using capsule of amantadine at a dose of 100 - 150 mg/day depending on weight ( 100 mg/day for < 30 kg and 150 mg/day for > 30 kg ) or methylpheni date at a dose of 20 - 30 mg/day for a 6-week double blind , r and omized clinical trial . The principal measure of outcome was the Teacher and Parent Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder Rating Scale-IV . RESULTS No significant differences were observed between the two groups on the Parent and Teacher Rating Scale scores ( df = 1 ; F = 0.02 ; p = 0.86 and df = 1 ; F = 0.01 ; p = 0.89 , respectively ) . Side effects of decreased appetite and restlessness were observed more frequently in the methylpheni date group . CONCLUSION The results of this study indicate that amantadine significantly improved symptoms of ADHD and was well tolerated and it may be beneficial in the treatment of children with ADHD . Nevertheless , the present results do not constitute proof of efficacy
On the CGI-I scale , the analysis revealed that MPH was more effective than ATX and GXR .
For any adverse events , RBX ( 89 % ) was the safest alternative .
Network meta- analysis offered a broader overview on the available treatments for ADHD , especially for safety issues , and contributes towards evidence gathering and clinical practice decisions .
The aim of this study is to gather evidence of head-to-head double-blind r and omized-controlled trials on the efficacy and safety of available treatments for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder ( ADHD ) in children and adolescents .