The articles were grouped into four main categories : decision aids and outcome predictors , electrical cardioversion-based protocol s , antiarrhythmic-based protocol s , and general management protocol s. Conclusion This systematic review is the first study to our knowledge to evaluate the optimal management of symptomatic AF/AFLin  the ED with a direct impact on ED disposition .
There are several viable management strategies that can result in safe discharge from the ED in the right patient population , and decision aids can be utilized to guide selection of appropriate patients for discharge
Introduction Management of  atrial fibrillation ( AF ) and atrial flutter ( AFL )  in the emergency department ( ED ) varies greatly , and there are currently no United States guidelines to guide management with regard to patient disposition after ED treatment .
The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the literature for decision aids to guide disposition of patients with AF/AFLin the ED , and assess potential outcomes associated with different management strategies in the ED .
Managing emergency department patients with recent-onset atrial fibrillation.
BACKGROUND The management of emergency department ( ED ) patients with presumed recent-onset atrial fibrillation or flutter≤48h in duration varies widely . OBJECTIVE AND METHOD We conducted a prospect i ve study across three affiliated community EDs within a large integrated health care delivery system to describe the management of patients with recent-onset atrial fibrillation or flutter , to determine the safety and effectiveness of  ED cardioversion  , and to measure the incidence of thromboembolism 30 days after discharge . RESULTS We enrolled 206 patients with convenience sampling between June 2005 and November 2007 . Mean age was 64.0±14.4 years ( range 21 - 96 years ) . Patients were grouped for analysis into four categories based on whether cardioversion was 1 ) spontaneous in the ED ( 59 ; 28.6 % ) ; 2 ) attempted with electrical or pharmacological means ( 115 ; 56.3 % ) , with success in 110 ( 95.7 % ) ; 3 ) hoped for during a short stint of home observation ( 16 ; 7.8 % , 11 of which spontaneously converted to sinus rhythm within 24h ) ; or 4 ) contraindicated ( 16 ; 7.8 % ) . Of the entire group , 183 ( 88.8 % ) patients were discharged home . Adverse events requiring ED interventions were reported in 6 ( 2.9 % ; 95 % confidence interval [ CI ] 1.1 - 6.2 % ) patients , all of whom recovered . Two ( 1.0 % ; 95 % CI 0.1 - 3.5 % ) patients were found to have an embolic event on 30-day follow-up . CONCLUSIONS Our approach to ED patients with presumed recent-onset atrial fibrillation or flutter seems to be safe and effective , with a high rate of cardioversion and discharge to home coupled with a low ED adverse event and 30-day thromboembolic event rate
The articles were grouped into four main categories : decision aids and outcome predictors , electrical cardioversion-based protocol s , antiarrhythmic-based protocol s , and general management protocol s. Conclusion This systematic review is the first study to our knowledge to evaluate the optimal management of symptomatic AF/AFLin  the ED with a direct impact on ED disposition .
There are several viable management strategies that can result in safe discharge from the ED in the right patient population , and decision aids can be utilized to guide selection of appropriate patients for discharge
Introduction Management of  atrial fibrillation ( AF ) and atrial flutter ( AFL )  in the emergency department ( ED ) varies greatly , and there are currently no United States guidelines to guide management with regard to patient disposition after ED treatment .
The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the literature for decision aids to guide disposition of patients with AF/AFLin the ED , and assess potential outcomes associated with different management strategies in the ED .