Results Although highlighting a general lack of high- quality real-life effectiveness observational research on these clinical ly important topics , the analysis provided insights into how identified observational studies might inform asthma guidelines developers and clinicians .
Overall , RELEVANT appeared reliable and easy to use by expert review ers .
Conclusions Using such quality appraisal tools is m and atory to assess whether specific observational real-life effectiveness studies can be used to inform guideline development and /or decision-making in clinical practice
Abstract Introduction A Task Force was commissioned jointly by the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology ( EAACI ) and the Respiratory Effectiveness Group ( REG ) to develop a  quality assessment tool for real-life observational research to identify high- quality real-life asthma studies that could be considered within future guideline development .
Leukotriene antagonists as first-line or add-on asthma-controller therapy.
BACKGROUND Most r and omized trials of treatment for asthma study highly selected patients under idealized conditions . METHODS We conducted two parallel , multicenter , pragmatic trials to evaluate the real-world effectiveness of a leukotriene-receptor antagonist ( LTRA ) as compared with either an inhaled glucocorticoid for first-line asthma-controller therapy or a long-acting beta(2)-agonist ( LABA ) as add-on therapy in patients already receiving inhaled glucocorticoid therapy . Eligible primary care patients 12 to 80 years of age had impaired asthma-related quality of life ( Mini Asthma Quality of Life Question naire [ MiniAQLQ ] score ≤6 ) or inadequate asthma control ( Asthma Control Question naire [ ACQ ] score ≥1 ) . We r and omly assigned patients to 2 years of open-label therapy , under the care of their usual physician , with LTRA ( 148 patients ) or an inhaled glucocorticoid ( 158 patients ) in the first-line controller therapy trial and LTRA ( 170 patients ) or LABA ( 182 patients ) added to an inhaled glucocorticoid in the add-on therapy trial . RESULTS Mean MiniAQLQ scores increased by 0.8 to 1.0 point over a period of 2 years in both trials . At 2 months , differences in the MiniAQLQ scores between the two treatment groups met our definition of equivalence ( 95 % confidence interval [ CI ] for an adjusted mean difference , -0.3 to 0.3 ) . At 2 years , mean MiniAQLQ scores approached equivalence , with an adjusted mean difference between treatment groups of -0.11 ( 95 % CI , -0.35 to 0.13 ) in the first-line controller therapy trial and of -0.11 ( 95 % CI , -0.32 to 0.11 ) in the add-on therapy trial . Exacerbation rates and ACQ scores did not differ significantly between the two groups . CONCLUSIONS Study results at 2 months suggest that LTRA was equivalent to an inhaled glucocorticoid as first-line controller therapy and to LABA as add-on therapy for diverse primary care patients . Equivalence was not proved at 2 years . The interpretation of results of pragmatic research may be limited by the crossover between treatment groups and lack of a placebo group . ( Funded by the National Coordinating Centre for Health Technology Assessment U.K. and others ; Controlled Clinical Trials number , IS RCT N99132811 . )
Results Although highlighting a general lack of high- quality real-life effectiveness observational research on these clinical ly important topics , the analysis provided insights into how identified observational studies might inform asthma guidelines developers and clinicians .
Overall , RELEVANT appeared reliable and easy to use by expert review ers .
Conclusions Using such quality appraisal tools is m and atory to assess whether specific observational real-life effectiveness studies can be used to inform guideline development and /or decision-making in clinical practice
Abstract Introduction A Task Force was commissioned jointly by the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology ( EAACI ) and the Respiratory Effectiveness Group ( REG ) to develop a  quality assessment tool for real-life observational research to identify high- quality real-life asthma studies that could be considered within future guideline development .