In many instances , no or minimal attempts to screen were undertaken or reported .
Background Subacromial shoulder pain is a common clinical presentation with much diagnostic uncertainty .
Some of this uncertainty relates to the involvement of the cervical spine as a source or contribution to subacromial shoulder pain .
Currently , there is no accepted method of screening of the cervical spine in the presence of subacromial shoulder pain , which risks patients receiving misguided and /or ineffective interventions .
Objective To evaluate approaches used to screen the cervical spine in patients with subacromial shoulder pain .
Comparison of supervised exercise with and without manual physical therapy for patients with shoulder impingement syndrome.
STUDY DESIGN A prospect i ve r and omized clinical trial . OBJECTIVE To compare the effectiveness of 2 physical therapy treatment approaches for impingement syndrome of the shoulder . BACKGROUND Manual physical therapy combined with exercise is a commonly applied but currently unproven clinical treatment for impingement syndrome of the shoulder . METHODS AND MEASURES Thirty men and 22 women ( age 43 years + /- 9.1 ) diagnosed with shoulder impingement syndrome were r and omly assigned to 1 of 2 treatment groups . The exercise group performed supervised flexibility and strengthening exercises . The manual therapy group performed the same program and received manual physical therapy treatment . Both groups received the selected intervention 6 times over a 3-week period . The testers , who were blinded to group assignment , measured strength , pain , and function before treatment and after 6 physical therapy visits . Strength was a composite score of isometric strength tests for internal rotation , external rotation , and abduction . Pain was a composite score of visual analog scale measures during resisted break tests , active abduction , and functional activities . Function was measured with a functional assessment question naire . The visual analog scale used to measure pain with functional activities and the functional assessment question naire were also measured 2 months after the initiation of treatment . RESULTS Subjects in both groups experienced significant decreases in pain and increases in function , but there was significantly more improvement in the manual therapy group compared to the exercise group . For example , pain in the manual therapy group was reduced from a pretreatment mean ( + /- SD ) of 575.8 ( + /- 220.0 ) to a posttreatment mean of 174.4 ( + /- 183.1 ) . In contrast , pain in the exercise group was reduced from a pretreatment mean of 557.1 ( + /- 237.2 ) to a posttreatment mean of 360.6 ( + /- 272.3 ) . Strength in the manual therapy group improved significantly while strength in the exercise group did not . CONCLUSION Manual physical therapy applied by experienced physical therapists combined with supervised exercise in a brief clinical trial is better than exercise alone for increasing strength , decreasing pain , and improving function in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome
In many instances , no or minimal attempts to screen were undertaken or reported .
Background Subacromial shoulder pain is a common clinical presentation with much diagnostic uncertainty .
Some of this uncertainty relates to the involvement of the cervical spine as a source or contribution to subacromial shoulder pain .
Currently , there is no accepted method of screening of the cervical spine in the presence of subacromial shoulder pain , which risks patients receiving misguided and /or ineffective interventions .
Objective To evaluate approaches used to screen the cervical spine in patients with subacromial shoulder pain .