Synbiotics failed to significantly increase growth in boys and girls .
Use of synbiotics increased stool frequency , had no impact on stool consistency , colic , spitting up / regurgitation , crying , restlessness or vomiting .
Probiotics in formula also failed to have any significant effect on growth , stool frequency or consistency .
Probiotics did not lower the incidence of diarrhoea , colic , spitting up / regurgitation , crying , restlessness or vomiting .
Prebiotics in formula did increase weight gain but had no impact on length or head circumference gain .
Prebiotics increased stool frequency but had no impact on stool consistency , the incidence of colic , spitting up / regurgitation , crying , restlessness or vomiting .
There was no impact of prebiotics on the volume of formula tolerated , infections and gastrointestinal microflora .
Authors ’ conclusions There is not enough evidence to state that supplementation of term infant formula with synbiotics , probiotics or prebiotics does result in improved growth or clinical outcomes in term infants .
There is no data available to establish if synbiotics are superior to probiotics or prebiotics
Background Synbiotics , probiotics or prebiotics are being added to infant formula to promote growth and development in infants .
Previous review s ( 2007 to 2011 ) on term infants given probiotics or prebiotics focused on prevention of allergic disease and food hypersensitivity .
This review focused on growth and clinical outcomes in term infants fed only infant formula containing synbiotics , probiotics or prebiotics .
Early dietary intervention with a mixture of prebiotic oligosaccharides reduces the incidence of allergic manifestations and infections during the first two years of life.
A mixture of neutral short-chain galactooligosaccharides ( scGOS ) and long-chain fructooligosaccharides ( lcFOS ) has been shown to reduce the incidence of atopic dermatitis ( AD ) and infectious episodes during the first 6 mo of life . This dual protection occurred through the intervention period . The present study evaluated if these protective effects were lasting beyond the intervention period . In a prospect i ve , r and omized , double-blind , placebo-controlled design , healthy term infants with a parental history of atopy were fed either a prebiotic-supplemented ( 8 g/L scGOS/lcFOS ) or placebo-supplemented ( 8 g/L maltodextrin ) hypoallergenic formula during the first 6 mo of life . Following this intervention period , blind follow-up continued until 2 y of life . Primary endpoints were cumulative incidence of allergic manifestations . Secondary endpoints were number of infectious episodes and growth .  Of 152 participants , 134 infants ( 68 in placebo , 66 in intervention group ) completed the follow-up . During this period , infants in the scGOS/lcFOS group had significantly lower incidence of allergic manifestations . Cumulative incidences for AD , recurrent wheezing , and allergic urticaria were higher in the placebo group , ( 27.9 , 20.6 , and 10.3 % , respectively ) than in the intervention group ( 13.6 , 7.6 , and 1.5 % ) ( P < 0.05 ) . Infants in the scGOS/lcFOS group had fewer episodes of physician-diagnosed overall and upper respiratory tract infections ( P < 0.01 ) , fever episodes ( P < 0.00001 ) , and fewer antibiotic prescriptions ( P < 0.05 ) . Growth was normal and similar in both groups . Early dietary intervention with oligosaccharide prebiotics has a protective effect against both allergic manifestations and infections . The observed dual protection lasting beyond the intervention period suggests that an immune modulating effect through the intestinal flora modification may be the principal mechanism of action
Synbiotics failed to significantly increase growth in boys and girls .
Use of synbiotics increased stool frequency , had no impact on stool consistency , colic , spitting up / regurgitation , crying , restlessness or vomiting .
Probiotics in formula also failed to have any significant effect on growth , stool frequency or consistency .
Probiotics did not lower the incidence of diarrhoea , colic , spitting up / regurgitation , crying , restlessness or vomiting .
Prebiotics in formula did increase weight gain but had no impact on length or head circumference gain .
Prebiotics increased stool frequency but had no impact on stool consistency , the incidence of colic , spitting up / regurgitation , crying , restlessness or vomiting .
There was no impact of prebiotics on the volume of formula tolerated , infections and gastrointestinal microflora .
Authors ’ conclusions There is not enough evidence to state that supplementation of term infant formula with synbiotics , probiotics or prebiotics does result in improved growth or clinical outcomes in term infants .
There is no data available to establish if synbiotics are superior to probiotics or prebiotics
Background Synbiotics , probiotics or prebiotics are being added to infant formula to promote growth and development in infants .
Previous review s ( 2007 to 2011 ) on term infants given probiotics or prebiotics focused on prevention of allergic disease and food hypersensitivity .
This review focused on growth and clinical outcomes in term infants fed only infant formula containing synbiotics , probiotics or prebiotics .