D. Restoration of sinus rhythm for monophasic vs. biphasic waveforms .
Another study showed that PVI result ed in long-term restoration
Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is a major public health problem in the United States .
More than 2.3 million Americans are estimated to have AF ( 1 ) .
The known association between AF and substantial mortality , morbidity , and health care costs compounds the effect of this condition .
Not only is the risk for death in patients with AF twice that of patients without it , but AF can result in myocardial ischemia and infa rct ion , exacerbate heart failure ( HF ) , and cause tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy if the ventricular rate is not well-controlled ( 25 ) .
The most dreaded complication of AF is thromboembolism , especially stroke ( 6 ) .
In some patients , AF or therapies to manage this condition can severely depreciate quality of life ( 710 ) .
Furthermore , the management of AF and its complications is responsible for nearly $ 16 billion in additional costs to the U.S. health care system per year ( 11 ) .
We conducted this systematic review to evaluate the comparative safety and effectiveness of rate- versus rhythm-control strategies ;  medications used for ventricular rate control ; strict versus more lenient rate-control strategies ; nonpharmacologic rate-control therapies  versus medications ; electrical cardioversion and antiarrhythmic medications  for restoration of sinus rhythm ;  and  catheter ablation , surgical ablation , and antiarrhythmic medications  for maintenance of sinus rhythm .
Left atrial ablation versus biatrial ablation for persistent and permanent atrial fibrillation: a prospective and randomized study.
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to compare -- in patients with persistent and permanent atrial fibrillation (AF)--the  efficacy and safety of left atrial ablation with that of a biatrial approach . BACKGROUND Left atrium-based catheter ablation of AF , although very effective in the paroxysmal form of the arrhythmia , has an insufficient efficacy in patients with persistent and permanent AF . METHODS Eighty highly symptomatic patients ( age , 58.6 + /- 8.9 years ) with persistent ( n = 43 ) and permanent AF ( n = 37 ) , refractory to antiarrhythmic drugs , were r and omized to two different ablation approaches guided by electroanatomical mapping . A procedure including circumferential pulmonary vein , mitral isthmus , and cavotricuspid isthmus ablation was performed in 41 cases ( left atrial ablation group ) . In the remaining 39 patients ( biatrial ablation group ) , the aforementioned approach was integrated by the following lesions in the right atrium : intercaval posterior line , intercaval septal line , and electrical disconnection of the superior vena cava . RESULTS During follow-up ( mean duration 14 + /- 5 months ) , AF recurred in 39 % of patients in the left atrial ablation group and in 15 % of patients in the biatrial ablation group ( p = 0.022 ) . Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that ablation technique was an independent predictor of AF recurrence during follow-up . CONCLUSIONS In patients with persistent and permanent AF , circumferential pulmonary vein ablation , combined with linear lesions in the right atrium , is feasible , safe , and has a significantly higher success rate than left atrial and cavotricuspid ablation alone
D. Restoration of sinus rhythm for monophasic vs. biphasic waveforms .
Another study showed that PVI result ed in long-term restoration
Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is a major public health problem in the United States .
More than 2.3 million Americans are estimated to have AF ( 1 ) .
The known association between AF and substantial mortality , morbidity , and health care costs compounds the effect of this condition .
Not only is the risk for death in patients with AF twice that of patients without it , but AF can result in myocardial ischemia and infa rct ion , exacerbate heart failure ( HF ) , and cause tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy if the ventricular rate is not well-controlled ( 25 ) .
The most dreaded complication of AF is thromboembolism , especially stroke ( 6 ) .
In some patients , AF or therapies to manage this condition can severely depreciate quality of life ( 710 ) .
Furthermore , the management of AF and its complications is responsible for nearly $ 16 billion in additional costs to the U.S. health care system per year ( 11 ) .
We conducted this systematic review to evaluate the comparative safety and effectiveness of rate- versus rhythm-control strategies ;  medications used for ventricular rate control ; strict versus more lenient rate-control strategies ; nonpharmacologic rate-control therapies  versus medications ; electrical cardioversion and antiarrhythmic medications  for restoration of sinus rhythm ;  and  catheter ablation , surgical ablation , and antiarrhythmic medications  for maintenance of sinus rhythm .