While there are many different scoring systems available for foot and ankle specialists to use to assess or demonstrate the effectiveness of treatments , the AOFAS , while it is an unvali date d scoring system , is the most commonly used scoring system in this review .
This review presents data about commonly used patient reported outcomes systems in foot and ankle surgery .
The goal of this systematic review is to determine the most commonly used outcome measurement tools used by foot and ankle specialists and determine their limitations , such as whether they are vali date d , have floor/ceiling effects , and so on .
Evaluation of the PROMIS physical function item bank in orthopaedic patients.
The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system ( PROMIS ) physical function item bank v1 ( PPFIB ) contains 124 item response theory ( IRT ) calibrated items ( Rose et al. 2008 . J Clin Epidemiol 61:17–33).We report the psychometric properties of these items within an outpatient , orthopaedic patient population . In particular , we investigated whether a single unidimensional IRT scale can adequately define physical function of patients presenting with primarily upper or lower extremity orthopaedic complaints . We conducted a prospect i ve study at an orthopaedic outpatient clinic to collect data from 865 adult patients with all 124 PROMIS physical function items and seven demographic items . Items were evaluated by a Rasch model . Total variance ( 60.6 % ) across the 124 items was explained by a single Rasch dimension . The variance explained by the second dimension was 7.7 % , reflecting differential item functioning in the upper and lower extremity patients . The upper extremity physical function items had a pronounced ceiling effect . A single physical function dimension accounts for most of the item variance in the PPFIB , suggesting that the items are measuring predominantly one single construct . Separate subscales for lower versus upper extremities , especially with additional items at the upper trait level of the upper extremity subscale , may further enhance evaluation of physical function in orthopaedic patients
While there are many different scoring systems available for foot and ankle specialists to use to assess or demonstrate the effectiveness of treatments , the AOFAS , while it is an unvali date d scoring system , is the most commonly used scoring system in this review .
This review presents data about commonly used patient reported outcomes systems in foot and ankle surgery .
The goal of this systematic review is to determine the most commonly used outcome measurement tools used by foot and ankle specialists and determine their limitations , such as whether they are vali date d , have floor/ceiling effects , and so on .