In particular , there is little evidence that the identified tools would be good at detecting change in intervention studies .
The obvious gaps in available outcome measurement include well-being and participation outcomes for children , and family quality -of-life outcomes , domains particularly valued by our informants ( young people with ASD and parents ) .
This is the first systematic review of the quality and appropriateness of tools design ed to monitor progress and outcomes of young children with ASD .
BACKGROUND The needs of children with autism spectrum disorder ( ASD ) are complex and this is reflected in the number and diversity of outcomes assessed and measurement tools used to collect evidence about children 's progress .
Relevant outcomes include improvement in core ASD impairments , such as communication , social awareness , sensory sensitivities and repetitiveness ; skills such as social functioning and play ; participation outcomes such as social inclusion ; and parent and family impact .
OBJECTIVES To examine the measurement properties of tools used to measure progress and outcomes in children with ASD up to the age of 6 years .
To identify outcome areas regarded as important by people with ASD and parents .
A new social communication intervention for children with autism: pilot randomised controlled treatment study suggesting effectiveness.
BACKGROUND Psychosocial treatments are the mainstay of management of autism in the UK but there is a notable lack of a systematic evidence base for their effectiveness . R and omised controlled trial ( RCT ) studies in this area have been rare but are essential because of the developmental heterogeneity of the disorder . We aim ed to test a new theoretically based social communication intervention targeting parental communication in a r and omised design against routine care alone . METHODS The intervention was given in addition to existing care and involved regular monthly therapist contact for 6 months with a further 6 months of 2-monthly consolidation sessions . It aim ed to educate parents and train them in adapted communication tailored to their child 's individual competencies . Twenty-eight children with autism were r and omised between this treatment and routine care alone , stratified for age and baseline severity . Outcome was measured at 12 months from commencement of intervention , using st and ardised instruments . RESULTS All cases studied met full Autism Diagnostic Interview ( ADI ) criteria for classical autism . Treatment and controls had similar routine care during the study period and there were no study dropouts after treatment had started . The active treatment group showed significant improvement compared with controls on the primary outcome measure -- Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule ( ADOS ) total score , particularly in reciprocal social interaction-- and on secondary measures of expressive language , communicative initiation and parent-child interaction . Suggestive but non-significant results were found in Vinel and Adaptive Behaviour Scales ( Communication Sub-domain ) and ADOS stereotyped and restricted behaviour domain . CONCLUSIONS A R and omised Treatment Trial design of this kind in classical autism is feasible and acceptable to patients . This pilot study suggests significant additional treatment benefits following a targeted ( but relatively non-intensive ) dyadic social communication treatment , when compared with routine care . The study needs replication on larger and independent sample s. It should encourage further RCT design s in this area
In particular , there is little evidence that the identified tools would be good at detecting change in intervention studies .
The obvious gaps in available outcome measurement include well-being and participation outcomes for children , and family quality -of-life outcomes , domains particularly valued by our informants ( young people with ASD and parents ) .
This is the first systematic review of the quality and appropriateness of tools design ed to monitor progress and outcomes of young children with ASD .
BACKGROUND The needs of children with autism spectrum disorder ( ASD ) are complex and this is reflected in the number and diversity of outcomes assessed and measurement tools used to collect evidence about children 's progress .
Relevant outcomes include improvement in core ASD impairments , such as communication , social awareness , sensory sensitivities and repetitiveness ; skills such as social functioning and play ; participation outcomes such as social inclusion ; and parent and family impact .
OBJECTIVES To examine the measurement properties of tools used to measure progress and outcomes in children with ASD up to the age of 6 years .
To identify outcome areas regarded as important by people with ASD and parents .