We found low- quality evidence that different work-break frequencies may have no effect on participant-reported musculoskeletal pain , discomfort and fatigue .
For productivity and work performance , evidence was of very low- quality that different work-break frequencies may have a positive effect .
For different types of break , there may be no effect on participant-reported musculoskeletal pain , discomfort and fatigue according to low- quality evidence .
Furthermore , work-break interventions should be reconsidered , taking into account worker population s other than office workers , and taking into account the possibility of combining work-break intervention with other interventions such as ergonomic training or counselling , which may may possibly have an effect on musculoskeletal outcomes and work performance
BACKGROUND Work-related musculoskeletal disorders are a group of musculoskeletal disorders that comprise one of the most common disorders related to occupational sick leave worldwide .
Musculoskeletal disorders accounted for 21 % to 28 % of work absenteeism days in 2017/2018 in the Netherl and s , Germany and the UK .
There are several interventions that may be effective in tackling the high prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders among workers , such as physical , cognitive and organisational interventions .
In this review , we will focus on work breaks as a measure of primary prevention , which are a type of organisational intervention .
OBJECTIVES To compare the effectiveness of different work-break schedules for preventing work-related musculoskeletal symptoms and disorders in healthy workers , when compared to conventional or alternate work-break schedules .
Walks4Work: assessing the role of the natural environment in a workplace physical activity intervention.
OBJECTIVES The primary aim of this study was to examine the impact of  physical activity ( PA ) in the natural environment ( eg , " green exercise " ) on resting autonomic function in the Walks4Work intervention . A secondary aim was to assess the feasibility of Walks4Work in terms of adherence , change in PA levels , and cardiovascular health parameters . METHODS In an 8-week r and omized control trial , 94 office workers in an international company were allocated to one of three groups : control , nature ( NW ) , or built ( BW ) lunchtime walking route . Both walking groups were required to undertake two lunchtime walks each week . The NW route centered around trees , maintained grass , and public footpaths . In contrast , the BW consisted of pavement routes through housing estates and industrial areas . Data were collected at baseline and following the intervention . To investigate the impact of the intervention , mixed- design analysis of variance ( ANOVA ) were performed . RESULTS A total of 73 participants completed the intervention ( drop-out rate of 22 % ) . No difference was observed in resting autonomic function between the groups . Self-reported mental health improved for the NW group only . PA levels increased at the intervention mid-point for all groups combined but adherence to the intervention was low with rates of 42 % and 43 % within the BW and NW groups , respectively . CONCLUSION Accompanying a guideline of two active lunchtimes per week with low facilitator input appears inadequate for increasing the number of active lunchtimes and modifying cardiovascular health parameters in an office population . However , this population fell within normal ranges for cardiovascular measures and future research should consider investigating at-risk population s , particularly hypertensive individuals
We found low- quality evidence that different work-break frequencies may have no effect on participant-reported musculoskeletal pain , discomfort and fatigue .
For productivity and work performance , evidence was of very low- quality that different work-break frequencies may have a positive effect .
For different types of break , there may be no effect on participant-reported musculoskeletal pain , discomfort and fatigue according to low- quality evidence .
Furthermore , work-break interventions should be reconsidered , taking into account worker population s other than office workers , and taking into account the possibility of combining work-break intervention with other interventions such as ergonomic training or counselling , which may may possibly have an effect on musculoskeletal outcomes and work performance
BACKGROUND Work-related musculoskeletal disorders are a group of musculoskeletal disorders that comprise one of the most common disorders related to occupational sick leave worldwide .
Musculoskeletal disorders accounted for 21 % to 28 % of work absenteeism days in 2017/2018 in the Netherl and s , Germany and the UK .
There are several interventions that may be effective in tackling the high prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders among workers , such as physical , cognitive and organisational interventions .
In this review , we will focus on work breaks as a measure of primary prevention , which are a type of organisational intervention .
OBJECTIVES To compare the effectiveness of different work-break schedules for preventing work-related musculoskeletal symptoms and disorders in healthy workers , when compared to conventional or alternate work-break schedules .