Our comprehensive review and meta- analysis of these experiments find suggestive evidence of health benefits associated with investments in early life , income support , and health insurance interventions .
Housing and neighborhood trials had no effect on the outcomes included in the meta-analyses .
A positive effect of the trial on its primary socioeconomic outcome was associated with higher odds of reporting health improvements .
Early life , income , and health insurance interventions have the potential to improve health .
Policy Points Social policies might not only improve economic well-being , but also health .
Health policy experts have therefore advocated for investments in social policies both to improve population health and potentially reduce health system costs .
Since the 1960s , a large number of social policies have been experimentally evaluated in the United States .
Some of these experiments include health outcomes , providing a unique opportunity to inform evidence -based policymaking .
CONTEXT Insurers and health care providers are investing heavily in nonmedical social interventions in an effort to improve health and potentially reduce health care costs .
Conditional Cash Transfers And Health Of Low-Income Families In The US: Evaluating The Family Rewards Experiment.
Opportunity  NYC-Family Rewards was the first conditional cash transfer , r and omized controlled trial for low-income families in the United States . From 2007 to 2010 , Family Rewards offered 2,377 New York City families cash transfers  that were conditional upon their investments in education , preventive health care , and parental employment . Their health and other outcomes were compared to those of a  control group of 2,372 families . The experiment led to a modest improvement in health insurance coverage and a large increase in the use of preventive dental care . It improved parents ' perception of their own health and levels of hope , mainly through improvements in reported financial well-being . While the program 's impacts on physical health were weaker , our study might not have captured effects on chronic disease risk that take longer to accrue . In the context of New York City 's operating social-safety-net programs , conditional cash transfers may have led to positive , albeit modest , improvements in the health of poor families
Our comprehensive review and meta- analysis of these experiments find suggestive evidence of health benefits associated with investments in early life , income support , and health insurance interventions .
Housing and neighborhood trials had no effect on the outcomes included in the meta-analyses .
A positive effect of the trial on its primary socioeconomic outcome was associated with higher odds of reporting health improvements .
Early life , income , and health insurance interventions have the potential to improve health .
Policy Points Social policies might not only improve economic well-being , but also health .
Health policy experts have therefore advocated for investments in social policies both to improve population health and potentially reduce health system costs .
Since the 1960s , a large number of social policies have been experimentally evaluated in the United States .
Some of these experiments include health outcomes , providing a unique opportunity to inform evidence -based policymaking .
CONTEXT Insurers and health care providers are investing heavily in nonmedical social interventions in an effort to improve health and potentially reduce health care costs .