The cost of intervention per participant delivered by dietitians was lower than interventions delivered by non-dietitians , although few studies reported costs .
Lifestyle interventions are effective in reducing body weight and glucose-related outcomes .
Dietitian-delivered interventions , compared with those delivered by other personnel , achieved greater weight reduction .
No consistent trend was identified across different delivery channels
BACKGROUND Type 2 diabetes is a significant public health concern .
With the completion of the Diabetes Prevention Program , there has been a proliferation of studies attempting to translate this evidence base into practice .
However , the cost , effectiveness , and cost-effectiveness of these adapted interventions is unknown .
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this systematic review was to conduct a comprehensive meta- analysis to synthesize the effectiveness , cost , and cost-effectiveness of lifestyle diabetes prevention interventions and compare effects by intervention delivery agent ( dietitian vs non-dietitian ) and channel ( in-person vs technology-delivered ) .
Results of a pilot diabetes prevention intervention in East Harlem, New York City: Project HEED.
OBJECTIVES Our community-academic partnership employed community-based participatory research to develop and pilot a simple , peer-led intervention to promote weight loss  , which can prevent diabetes and eliminate racial/ethnic disparities in incident diabetes among overweight adults with prediabetes . METHODS We recruited overweight adults at community sites , performed oral glucose tolerance testing to identify persons with blood glucose levels in the prediabetes range , and r and omized eligible people to a  peer-led lifestyle intervention group or delayed intervention  in 1 year . Outcomes , including weight , blood pressure , and health behaviors , were measured at baseline and 3 , 6 , and 12 months . RESULTS More than half of those tested ( 56 % , or 99 of 178 ) had prediabetes and enrolled in the study . Participants were predominantly Spanish-speaking , low-income , undereducated women . The intervention group lost significantly more weight than the control group and maintained weight loss at 12 months ( 7.2 versus 2.4 pounds ; P < .01 ) . One fourth ( 24 of 99 ) of participants progressed to diabetes . CONCLUSIONS In underserved minority communities , prediabetes prevalence may be higher than previously reported . Low-cost , community-based interventions can succeed in encouraging weight loss to prevent diabetes
The cost of intervention per participant delivered by dietitians was lower than interventions delivered by non-dietitians , although few studies reported costs .
Lifestyle interventions are effective in reducing body weight and glucose-related outcomes .
Dietitian-delivered interventions , compared with those delivered by other personnel , achieved greater weight reduction .
No consistent trend was identified across different delivery channels
BACKGROUND Type 2 diabetes is a significant public health concern .
With the completion of the Diabetes Prevention Program , there has been a proliferation of studies attempting to translate this evidence base into practice .
However , the cost , effectiveness , and cost-effectiveness of these adapted interventions is unknown .
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this systematic review was to conduct a comprehensive meta- analysis to synthesize the effectiveness , cost , and cost-effectiveness of lifestyle diabetes prevention interventions and compare effects by intervention delivery agent ( dietitian vs non-dietitian ) and channel ( in-person vs technology-delivered ) .