Meta-analyses showed no clinical ly relevant differences in terms of revision rates , clinical outcome scores or patient-reported outcome measures between MB and FB TKRs .
It appears that theoretical assumptions of superiority of MB over FB TKR are not borne out in clinical practice
Mobile-bearing ( MB ) total knee replacement ( TKR ) was introduced to reduce the risk of aseptic loosening and wear of polyethylene inserts .
However , no consistent clinical advantages of mobile- over fixed-bearing ( FB ) TKR have been found .
In this study we evaluated whether mobile bearings have an advantage over fixed bearings with regard to revision rates and clinical outcome scores .
Furthermore , we determined which modifying variables affected the outcome .
Patient-reported outcomes after fixed- versus mobile-bearing total knee replacement: a multi-centre randomised controlled trial using the Kinemax total knee replacement.
We compared patient-reported outcomes of the Kinemax fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee replacement in a multi-centre r and omised controlled trial . Patients were  r and omised to the fixed- or the mobile-bearing prosthesis via a sealed envelope method after the bone cuts had been made in the operating theatre . R and omisation was stratified by centre and diagnosis . Patients were assessed pre-operatively and at eight to 12 weeks , one year and two years post-operatively . Vali date d question naires were used which included the Western Ontario MacMasters University , Short-Form 12 , Mental Health Index-5 , Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Knee-Related Quality of Life and Function in Sport and Recreation scales and a vali date d scale of satisfaction post-operatively . In total , 242 patients ( 250 knees ) with a mean age of 68 years ( 40 to 80 ) were recruited from four NHS orthopaedic centres . Of these , 132 patients ( 54.5 % ) were women . No statistically significant differences could be identified in any of the patient-reported outcome scores between patients who received the fixed-bearing or the mobile-bearing knee up to two-years post-operatively
Meta-analyses showed no clinical ly relevant differences in terms of revision rates , clinical outcome scores or patient-reported outcome measures between MB and FB TKRs .
It appears that theoretical assumptions of superiority of MB over FB TKR are not borne out in clinical practice
Mobile-bearing ( MB ) total knee replacement ( TKR ) was introduced to reduce the risk of aseptic loosening and wear of polyethylene inserts .
However , no consistent clinical advantages of mobile- over fixed-bearing ( FB ) TKR have been found .
In this study we evaluated whether mobile bearings have an advantage over fixed bearings with regard to revision rates and clinical outcome scores .
Furthermore , we determined which modifying variables affected the outcome .