Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
Effects of exercise on fatigue, physical functioning, and emotional distress during radiation therapy for breast cancer.
PURPOSE S/ OBJECTIVES To test the hypothesis that women participating in a walking exercise program during radiation therapy treatment for breast cancer would demonstrate more adaptive responses as evidence d by higher levels of physical functioning and lower levels of symptom intensity than women who did not participate . DESIGN Experimental , two-group pretest , post-test . SETTING Two university teaching hospital outpatient radiation therapy departments . SAMPLE 46 women beginning a six-week program of radiation therapy for early stage breast cancer . METHODS Following r and om assignment , subjects in the exercise group maintained an individualized , self-paced , home-based walking exercise program throughout treatment . The control group received usual care . Dependent variables were measured prior to and at the end of radiation therapy . In addition , symptoms were assessed at the end of three weeks of treatment . MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES Participation in the walking exercise program , physical functioning fatigue , emotional distress , and difficulty sleeping . FINDINGS Hypothesis testing by multivariate analysis of covariance , with pretest scores as covariates , indicated significant differences between groups on outcome measures ( p < 0.001 ) . The exercise group scored significantly higher than the usual care group on physical functioning ( p = 0.003 ) and symptom intensity , particularly fatigue , anxiety , and difficulty sleeping . Fatigue was the most frequent and intense subjective symptom reported . CONCLUSIONS A self-paced , home-based walking exercise program can help manage symptoms and improve physical functioning during radiation therapy . IMPLICATION S FOR NURSING PRACTICE Nurse-prescribed and -monitored exercise is an effective , convenient , and low-cost self-care activity that reduces symptoms and facilitates adaptation to breast cancer diagnosis and treatment
Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?