Pooled net change in systolic blood pressure ( 16 trials ) was -1.86 ( 95 % CI -3.17 to -0.55 ; p=0.01 ) mm Hg ; diastolic blood pressure ( 15 trials ) , -1.53 ( -2.43 to -0.62 ; p=0.001 ) mm Hg ; body mass index ( 14 trials ) , -0.13 ( -0.26 to -0.01 ; p=0.04 ) kg/m2 ; serum total cholesterol ( 14 trials ) , -0.13 ( -0.19 to -0.07 ; p<0.001 ) mmol/L. There was no significant association between interventions with a reported theoretical basis and improved intervention outcomes .
No association was observed between intervention intensity ( number of sessions and intervention duration ) and intervention outcomes .
MHBC interventions delivered to CVD-free participants in primary care did not appear to have quantitatively important effects on CVD risk factors .
BACKGROUND It is uncertain whether multiple health behaviour change ( MHBC ) interventions are effective for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease ( CVD ) in primary care .
A 3-Year Randomized Trial of Lifestyle Intervention for Cardiovascular Risk Reduction in the Primary Care Setting: The Swedish Björknäs Study
Background Successfully transferring the findings of expensive and tightly controlled programmes of intensive lifestyle modification to the primary care setting is necessary if such knowledge is to be of clinical utility . The objective of this study was to test whether intensive lifestyle modification , shown previously in tightly-controlled clinical trials to be efficacious for diabetes risk-reduction among high-risk individuals , can reduce cardiovascular risk factor levels in the primary care setting . Methodology / Principal Findings The Swedish Björknäs study was a r and omized controlled trial conducted from 2003 to 2006 with follow-up on cardiovascular risk factors at 3 , 12 , 24 and 36 months . A total of 151 middle-aged men and women at moderate- to high-risk of cardiovascular disease from northern Sweden were r and omly assigned to either an intensive lifestyle intervention ( n = 75 ) or control ( n = 76 ) group . The intervention was based broadly on the protocol of the Diabetes Prevention Program . The three-month intervention period was administered in the primary care setting and consisted of supervised exercise sessions and diet counselling , followed by regular group meetings during three years . The control group was given general advice about diet and exercise and received st and ard clinical care . Outcomes were changes in anthropometrics , aerobic fitness , self-reported physical activity , blood pressure , and metabolic traits . At 36 months post-r and omisation , intensive lifestyle modification  reduced waist circumference ( −2.2 cm : p = 0.001 ) , waist-hip ratio ( −0.02 : p<0.0001 ) , systolic blood pressure ( −4.9 mmHg : p = 0.036 ) , and diastolic blood pressure ( −1.6 mmHg : p = 0.005 ) , and improved aerobic fitness ( 5 % ; p = 0.038 ) . Changes in lipid or glucose values did not differ statistically between groups . At 36 months , self-reported time spent exercising and total physical activity had increased more in the intervention group than in the control group ( p<0.001 ) . Conclusion / Significance A program of intensive lifestyle modification undertaken in the primary health care setting can favourably influence cardiovascular risk-factor profiles in high-risk individuals . Trial Registration Clinical Trials.gov
Pooled net change in systolic blood pressure ( 16 trials ) was -1.86 ( 95 % CI -3.17 to -0.55 ; p=0.01 ) mm Hg ; diastolic blood pressure ( 15 trials ) , -1.53 ( -2.43 to -0.62 ; p=0.001 ) mm Hg ; body mass index ( 14 trials ) , -0.13 ( -0.26 to -0.01 ; p=0.04 ) kg/m2 ; serum total cholesterol ( 14 trials ) , -0.13 ( -0.19 to -0.07 ; p<0.001 ) mmol/L. There was no significant association between interventions with a reported theoretical basis and improved intervention outcomes .
No association was observed between intervention intensity ( number of sessions and intervention duration ) and intervention outcomes .
MHBC interventions delivered to CVD-free participants in primary care did not appear to have quantitatively important effects on CVD risk factors .
BACKGROUND It is uncertain whether multiple health behaviour change ( MHBC ) interventions are effective for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease ( CVD ) in primary care .