Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
Qualitative analysis of patients’ feedback from a PROMs survey of cancer patients in England
Objective This study examined how free-text comments from cancer survivors  could complement formal patient-reported outcome measures ( PROMs ) , as part of the Engl and PROMs survey programme for cancer . Design A qualitative content analysis was conducted of responses to a single open-ended free-text question placed at the end of the cross-sectional population -based postal question naire . Setting Individuals were identified through three UK Cancer Registries and question naires were posted to their home addresses . Participants A r and om sample of individuals ( n=4992 ) diagnosed with breast , colorectal , non-Hodgkins lymphoma or prostate cancer at 1 , 2 , 3 and 5 years earlier . Results 3300 participants completed the survey ( 68 % response rate ) . Of these 1056 ( 32 % ) completed the free-text comments box , indicating a high level of commitment to provide written feedback on patient experience . Almost a fifth ( 19 % ) related experiences of excellent care during the treatment phase , with only 8 % reporting negative experiences . This contrasted with experiences of care after primary cancer treatment where the majority were negative . Factors impacting negatively upon patient-reported outcomes included the emotional impact of cancer ; poor experiences of treatment and care ; comorbidities , treatment side effects , social difficulties and inadequate preparation for a wide range of sometimes long-lasting on-going physical and psychological problems . Mediating factors assisting recovery incorporated both professional-led factors , such as quality of preparation for anticipated problems and aftercare services , and participant-led factors , such as learning from other cancer survivors and self-learning through trial and error . The support of friends and family was also a factor in participants ' outcomes . Conclusions This analysis of free-text comments complements quantitative analysis of PROMs measure 's by illuminating relationships between factors that impact on quality of life ( QoL ) and indicate why cancer patients may experience significantly worse QoL than the general population . The data suggest more systematic preparation and aftercare for individuals to self-manage post-treatment problems might improve QoL outcomes among cancer survivors
Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?