The present evidence indicated the similar performance in survivorship among CoC , CoPc , CoPxl and MoPxl bearing implants , and that all likely have superiority compared with the MoM and MoPc bearing implants in THA procedures .
PURPOSE Although many  total hip bearing implants  are widely used all over the world , simultaneous comparisons across the numerous available bearing surfaces are rare .
The purpose of this study was to compare the survivorship of total hip arthroplasty ( THA ) with six available bearing implants .
Large-diameter Delta ceramic-on-ceramic versus common-sized ceramic-on-polyethylene bearings in THA.
The higher failure rate of total hip arthroplasty ( THA ) in young , active patients remains a challenge for surgeons . Recently , larger-diameter femoral heads combined with an alumina matrix composite ceramic ( BIOLOX Delta ; CeramTec AG , Plochingen , Germany ) articulation was developed to improve implant longevity and meet patients ' activity dem and s while reducing the risk of component-related complications . The purpose of this study was to determine whether this new device may provide advantages for young , active patients . A prospect i ve , r and omized , controlled trial was conducted on 93 patients ( 113 THAs ) with more than 3 years of follow-up . Patients were r and omly divided into a study group ( 51 THAs ) with a 36-mm Delta ceramic-on-ceramic ( COC ) articulation and a control group ( 62 THAs ) with a common-sized alumina ceramic head on polyethylene liner ( COP ) articulation .  Clinical and radiographic results were collected to compare the outcomes and complications , including implant-related failures , osteolysis , and noises . The large-diameter Delta COC articulation provided greater range of motion improvement ( 6.1 ° more ) , similar Harris Hip Scores , and similar complication rates compared with the alumina COP articulation . This study suggests that in the short term , the large-diameter Delta COC articulation results in better range of motion with no higher complication rates ; however , mid-term ( 8 - 10 years ) or longer follow-up is necessary to determine its superiority in young , active patients
The present evidence indicated the similar performance in survivorship among CoC , CoPc , CoPxl and MoPxl bearing implants , and that all likely have superiority compared with the MoM and MoPc bearing implants in THA procedures .
PURPOSE Although many  total hip bearing implants  are widely used all over the world , simultaneous comparisons across the numerous available bearing surfaces are rare .
The purpose of this study was to compare the survivorship of total hip arthroplasty ( THA ) with six available bearing implants .