The sensitivity and specificity of commonly implemented sideline assessment tools are generally good to very good , especially for symptom scores and cognitive evaluations performed within 48 hours of injury , and they are improved when a baseline evaluation is available for comparison .
CONTEXT The sideline assessment of concussion is challenging , given its variable presentations , the limited sensitivity and specificity of sideline assessment tools , and how the presentation of the injury evolves over time .
In addition , the diagnostic process , as well as the tools used to assess and manage concussion , continue to progress as research and what we know about concussion advance .
This paper focuses on the initial assessment on the sideline by review ing the concussion-evaluation literature , drawing from clinical experience to emphasize a st and ardized approach , and underscoring the importance of both familiarity with the athlete and clinical judgment .
OBJECTIVE To review the evidence regarding the clinical assessment of sport-related concussion on the sideline .
Additional considerations included making same-day return-to-play decisions , the sensitivity and specificity of sideline testing , and the importance of ongoing assessment and follow-up of injured athletes .
CONCLUSIONS The sideline assessment of sport-related concussion is challenging given the elusiveness and variability of presentation , reliance on athlete-reported symptoms , and the varying specificity and sensitivity values of sideline assessment tools .
In addition , the recognition of injury and assessment often occur in a time-pressured environment , requiring rapid disposition and decision making .
MEASUREMENT OF HEAD IMPACTS IN COLLEGIATE FOOTBALL PLAYERS: RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HEAD IMPACT BIOMECHANICS AND ACUTE CLINICAL OUTCOME AFTER CONCUSSION
OBJECTIVE To determine the relationship between recorded head accelerations and impact locations and acute clinical outcome of symptomatology , neuropsychological , and postural stability tests after cerebral concussion in Division I collegiate football players . METHODS A prospect i ve field study was used in which accelerometers were embedded in the football helmets of 88 collegiate football players .  Linear and rotational accelerations of all head impacts sustained over the course of 2004 to 2006 National Collegiate Athletic Association football seasons were collected in real-time . Change scores were calculated on clinical measures from the players ' preseason baseline to postinjury ( within 48 h ) and regressed against the recorded linear and rotational accelerations of the head at the time of the concussion . RESULTS Thirteen concussions were recorded ranging in impact magnitudes of 60.51 to 168.71 g. Linear regression showed no significant relationships between impact magnitude ( linear or rotational acceleration ) or impact location and change scores for symptom severity , postural stability , or neurocognitive function ( P > 0.05 ) . CONCLUSION Our findings suggest that football players are concussed by impacts to the head that occur at a wide range of magnitudes and that clinical measures of acute symptom severity , postural stability , and neuropsychological function all appear to be largely independent of impact magnitude and location . Because of the varying magnitudes and locations of impacts result ing in concussion as well as other factors such as the frequency of subconcussive impacts and number of previous concussions , it may be difficult to establish a threshold for concussive injury that can be applied to all football players
The sensitivity and specificity of commonly implemented sideline assessment tools are generally good to very good , especially for symptom scores and cognitive evaluations performed within 48 hours of injury , and they are improved when a baseline evaluation is available for comparison .
CONTEXT The sideline assessment of concussion is challenging , given its variable presentations , the limited sensitivity and specificity of sideline assessment tools , and how the presentation of the injury evolves over time .
In addition , the diagnostic process , as well as the tools used to assess and manage concussion , continue to progress as research and what we know about concussion advance .
This paper focuses on the initial assessment on the sideline by review ing the concussion-evaluation literature , drawing from clinical experience to emphasize a st and ardized approach , and underscoring the importance of both familiarity with the athlete and clinical judgment .
OBJECTIVE To review the evidence regarding the clinical assessment of sport-related concussion on the sideline .
Additional considerations included making same-day return-to-play decisions , the sensitivity and specificity of sideline testing , and the importance of ongoing assessment and follow-up of injured athletes .
CONCLUSIONS The sideline assessment of sport-related concussion is challenging given the elusiveness and variability of presentation , reliance on athlete-reported symptoms , and the varying specificity and sensitivity values of sideline assessment tools .
In addition , the recognition of injury and assessment often occur in a time-pressured environment , requiring rapid disposition and decision making .