The HBET group did not show improvement in MWD/T compared with the WA group ( SMD 0.30 , 95 % CI -0.45 to 1.05 ; P = 0.43 ; moderate- quality evidence ) .Compared with HBET , SET was more beneficial for PFWD/T but had no effect on quality of life parameters nor on self-reported functional impairment .
Compared with WA , SET was more beneficial for PFWD/T and self-reported functional impairment , as well as for some quality of life parameters ( e.g. , physical functioning , pain , and physical component summary after 12 months ) , and HBET had no effect .
Data show no obvious effects on mortality rates .
Evidence of moderate and high quality shows that SET provides an important benefit for treadmill-measured walking distance ( MWD and PFWD ) compared with HBET and WA , respectively .
Although its clinical relevance has not been definitively demonstrated , this benefit translates to increased MWD of 120 and 210 meters after three months in SET groups .
These increased walking distances are likely to have a positive impact on the lives of patients with IC .
Data provide no clear evidence of a difference between HBET and WA .
Trials show no clear differences in quality of life parameters nor in self-reported functional impairment between SET and HBET .
BACKGROUND Although supervised exercise therapy ( SET ) provides significant symptomatic benefit for patients with intermittent claudication ( IC ) , it remains an underutilized tool .
Widespread implementation of SET is restricted by lack of facilities and funding .
Structured home-based exercise therapy ( HBET ) with an observation component ( e.g. , exercise logbooks , pedometers ) and just walking advice ( WA ) are alternatives to SET .
This is the second up date of a review first published in 2006 .
OBJECTIVES The primary objective was to provide an accurate overview of studies evaluating effects of SET programs , HBET programs , and WA on maximal treadmill walking distance or time ( MWD/T ) for patients with IC .
Secondary objectives were to evaluate effects of SET , HBET , and WA on pain-free treadmill walking distance or time ( PFWD/T ) , quality of life , and self-reported functional impairment .
Hospital vs Home-Based Exercise Rehabilitation for Patients with Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease
Supervised , hospital-based exercise rehabilitation programs are effective for improving functional status for patients with claudication due to peripheral arterial occlusive disease . However , it has been suggested that unsupervised , home-based exercise programs , which have been relatively little evaluated , would be equally efficacious as compared with hospital-based programs . The authors tested the hypothesis that a hospital-based exercise rehabilitation program would improve treadmill exercise perfor mance more than a home-based program . Of 20 consecutively enrolled patients with claudication , 10 were r and omly placed into a supervised , hospital-based program and 10 into an unsupervised , home-based program for a three-month period .  Exercise perfor mance was evaluated by treadmill testing using a grade d protocol . In addition , func tional status was evaluated by the Walking Impairment Question naire ( WIQ ) and the Medical Outcomes Study SF-20 question naire ( MOS ) . Patients in the hospital-based program were treated with treadmill walking three times a week for one hour/visit . Patients in the home-based program were instructed to walk at least three times a week and were contacted weekly to provide encouragement and to record compliance with ( continued on next page ) the program . Patients in the hospital-based group improved peak walking time by 137 % , pain-free walking time by 150 % , and peak oxygen consumption by 19 % ( all P<0.05 ) . Patients reported an improved walking distance and speed according to WIQ data ( both P<0.05 ) . In addition , the MOS physical functioning score in the hospital-based group improved by 20 percentage points ( P<0.05 ) . In contrast , patients in the home-based program did not improve exercise performance measured on the treadmill . Improvement in the ability to walk on the treadmill was greater in the hospital-based than the home- based program ( P<0.05 ) . The ability to walk distances was the only question naire measure that improved in persons who received the home-based program ( P<0.05 ) . Preliminary results suggest that a supervised , hospital-based program is more effective for improving treadmill exercise performance than an unsupervised , home-based program
The HBET group did not show improvement in MWD/T compared with the WA group ( SMD 0.30 , 95 % CI -0.45 to 1.05 ; P = 0.43 ; moderate- quality evidence ) .Compared with HBET , SET was more beneficial for PFWD/T but had no effect on quality of life parameters nor on self-reported functional impairment .
Compared with WA , SET was more beneficial for PFWD/T and self-reported functional impairment , as well as for some quality of life parameters ( e.g. , physical functioning , pain , and physical component summary after 12 months ) , and HBET had no effect .
Data show no obvious effects on mortality rates .
Evidence of moderate and high quality shows that SET provides an important benefit for treadmill-measured walking distance ( MWD and PFWD ) compared with HBET and WA , respectively .
Although its clinical relevance has not been definitively demonstrated , this benefit translates to increased MWD of 120 and 210 meters after three months in SET groups .
These increased walking distances are likely to have a positive impact on the lives of patients with IC .
Data provide no clear evidence of a difference between HBET and WA .
Trials show no clear differences in quality of life parameters nor in self-reported functional impairment between SET and HBET .
BACKGROUND Although supervised exercise therapy ( SET ) provides significant symptomatic benefit for patients with intermittent claudication ( IC ) , it remains an underutilized tool .
Widespread implementation of SET is restricted by lack of facilities and funding .
Structured home-based exercise therapy ( HBET ) with an observation component ( e.g. , exercise logbooks , pedometers ) and just walking advice ( WA ) are alternatives to SET .
This is the second up date of a review first published in 2006 .
OBJECTIVES The primary objective was to provide an accurate overview of studies evaluating effects of SET programs , HBET programs , and WA on maximal treadmill walking distance or time ( MWD/T ) for patients with IC .
Secondary objectives were to evaluate effects of SET , HBET , and WA on pain-free treadmill walking distance or time ( PFWD/T ) , quality of life , and self-reported functional impairment .