There is uncertainty whether current strategies for providing CVD risk scores  affect CVD events .
Providing CVD risk scores may slightly reduce CVD risk factor levels and may increase preventive medication prescribing in higher-risk people without evidence of harm .
BACKGROUND The current paradigm for cardiovascular disease ( CVD ) emphasises absolute risk assessment to guide treatment decisions in primary prevention .
Although the derivation and validation of multivariable risk assessment tools , or CVD risk scores , have attracted considerable attention , their effect on clinical outcomes is uncertain .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of evaluating and providing CVD risk scores in adults without prevalent CVD on cardiovascular outcomes , risk factor levels , preventive medication prescribing , and health behaviours .
Involving patients in cardiovascular risk management with nurse-led clinics: a cluster randomized controlled trial
Background : Preventive guidelines on cardiovascular risk management recommend lifestyle changes . Support for lifestyle changes may be a useful task for practice nurses , but the effect of such interventions in primary prevention is not clear . We examined the effect of involving patients in nurse-led cardiovascular risk management on lifestyle adherence and cardiovascular risk . Methods : We performed a cluster r and omized controlled trial in 25 practice s that included 615 patients . The intervention consisted of nurse-led cardiovascular risk management , including risk assessment , risk communication , a decision aid and adapted motivational interviewing . The control group received a minimal nurse-led intervention . The self-reported outcome measures at one year were smoking , alcohol use , diet and physical activity . Nurses assessed 10-year cardiovascular mortality risk after one year . Results : There were no significant differences between the intervention groups . The effect of the intervention on the consumption of vegetables and physical activity was small , and some differences were only significant for subgroups . The effects of the intervention on the intake of fat , fruit and alcohol and smoking were not significant . We found no effect between the groups for cardiovascular 10-year risk . Interpretation : Nurse-led risk communication , use of a decision aid and adapted motivational interviewing did not lead to relevant differences between the groups in terms of lifestyle changes or cardiovascular risk , despite significant within-group differences
There is uncertainty whether current strategies for providing CVD risk scores  affect CVD events .
Providing CVD risk scores may slightly reduce CVD risk factor levels and may increase preventive medication prescribing in higher-risk people without evidence of harm .
BACKGROUND The current paradigm for cardiovascular disease ( CVD ) emphasises absolute risk assessment to guide treatment decisions in primary prevention .
Although the derivation and validation of multivariable risk assessment tools , or CVD risk scores , have attracted considerable attention , their effect on clinical outcomes is uncertain .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of evaluating and providing CVD risk scores in adults without prevalent CVD on cardiovascular outcomes , risk factor levels , preventive medication prescribing , and health behaviours .