SET was still beneficial for maximal and pain-free walking distances at 12 months , but it did not have a significant effect on quality of life parameters .
AUTHORS ' CONCLUSIONS SET has statistically significant benefit on treadmill walking distance ( maximal and pain-free ) compared with non-supervised regimens .
BACKGROUND Although supervised exercise therapy is considered to be of significant benefit for people with leg pain ( peripheral arterial disease ( PAD ) ) , implementing supervised exercise programs ( SETs ) in daily practice has limitations .
This is an up date of a review first published in 2006 .
OBJECTIVES The main objective of this review was to provide an accurate overview of studies evaluating the effects of supervised versus non-supervised exercise therapy on maximal walking time or distance on a treadmill for people with intermittent claudication .
Peripheral arterial disease and intermittent claudication: efficacy of short-term upper body strength training, dynamic exercise training, and advice to exercise at home.
OBJECTIVE To compare the effect of two training programmes and advice to exercise at home on physiological adaptations in patients with peripheral arterial disease ( PAD ) . DESIGN 30 patients with a typical history of PAD and intermittent claudication were r and omised to either an upper body strength training programme ( UBST ) , a dynamic ( walking , cycling , circuit ) conventional exercise rehabilitation programme ( CER ) , or advice to ' walk as much as possible at home ' ( CONT ) . Before and after intervention groups performed a st and ard grade d treadmill exercise test ( GTET ) and a 6-minute walk test ( SMWT ) to determine peak physiological parameters and walking distances . Maximal walking distance ( MWD ) , pain-free walking distance ( PFWD ) , peak oxygen uptake ( VO2 ) , heart rate and perceived pain were measured . RESULTS MWD on the GTET increased significantly in the CER group compared with the CONT and UBST groups ( 93.9 + /- 79 % v. 7.0 + /- 19.8 % v. 7.3 + /- 46 % ; CER v. UBST v. CONT p = 0.003 ) . Similarly , peak VO2 increased with CER compared with the CONT and UBST groups ( 28.4 + /- 20 v. -6.2 + /- 15 v. -1.0 + /- 21 % ; CER v. UBST v. CONT p = 0.004 ) . During the SMWT the CER and UBST groups improved in PFWD compared with the CONT group ( 37 + /- 47 % v. 27 + /- 71 % v. -30 + /- 29 % ; CER v. UBST v. CONT p = 0.03 ) , and perceived pain decreased in the CER group compared with the UBST group ( -24 + /- 39 % v. 27 + /- 48 % ; CER v. UBST p = 0.01 ) . CONCLUSION CER improves physiological parameters and walking distances more than UBST does . CER is effective within 6 weeks . Verbal encouragement to exercise is an ineffective form of management
SET was still beneficial for maximal and pain-free walking distances at 12 months , but it did not have a significant effect on quality of life parameters .
AUTHORS ' CONCLUSIONS SET has statistically significant benefit on treadmill walking distance ( maximal and pain-free ) compared with non-supervised regimens .
BACKGROUND Although supervised exercise therapy is considered to be of significant benefit for people with leg pain ( peripheral arterial disease ( PAD ) ) , implementing supervised exercise programs ( SETs ) in daily practice has limitations .
This is an up date of a review first published in 2006 .
OBJECTIVES The main objective of this review was to provide an accurate overview of studies evaluating the effects of supervised versus non-supervised exercise therapy on maximal walking time or distance on a treadmill for people with intermittent claudication .