There was also some weak evidence to suggest that patients taking milnacipran experienced fewer adverse events of sleepiness/ drowsiness , dry mouth or constipation compared with TCAs .
AUTHORS ' CONCLUSIONS Currently , there is inadequate evidence to conclude whether milnacipran is superior , inferior or the same as other antidepressive agents in terms of efficacy , acceptability and tolerability in the acute phase treatment of major depression .
However , there is some evidence in favour of milnacipran over TCAs in terms of dropouts due to adverse events ( acceptability ) and the rates of experiencing adverse events ( tolerability ) .
Further study is needed to answer whether milnacipran would be the better choice of antidepressant for acute major depression
BACKGROUND Although pharmacological and psychological interventions are both effective for major depression , antidepressant drugs are frequently used as first-line treatment in primary and secondary care setting s. Milnacipran , a dual serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor ( SNRI ) , is one of the antidepressant drugs that clinicians use for routine depression care .
OBJECTIVES To assess the evidence for the efficacy , acceptability and tolerability of milnacipran in comparison with tricyclic antidepressants ( TCAs ) , heterocyclics , SSRIs and other newer antidepressive agents in the acute-phase treatment of major depression .
A randomised, double-blind comparison of milnacipran and imipramine in the treatment of depression.
This multicentre , double-blind , r and omised trial in 109 patients compared the efficacy and tolerance of the novel selective serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor ( SNRI ) antidepressant milnacipran ( 50 mg twice daily , n=53 ) with the established tricyclic agent imipramine ( 75 mg twice daily , n=56 ) over a period of 6 weeks , in patients with major depression ( Montgomery-Asberg depression rating score ( MADRS ) > or = 25 ) . Initiation of antidepressant medication was conducted during a 2-week period of hospitalisation , after a 3- to 7-day washout period . Concomitant psychiatric medication was limited to lorazepam , cyamemazine , chloral hydrate and long-term uncomplicated lithium therapy . Assessment for efficacy using the MADRS and Hamilton rating scales of depression , a visual analogue scale and global evaluation revealed both agents to be highly effective ( P=0.0001 ) in this group of patients . Milnacipran was found to be of similar efficacy to imipramine .  Tolerance , assessed by physiological and biochemical examinations with routine inventory and spontaneous report of adverse events , revealed a clear advantage for milnacipran . The incidence of anticholinergic events with milnacipran was about half that with imipramine and the overall incidence of adverse events by either reporting method was markedly lower with milnacipran than with imipramine . Furthermore , the patient drop-out rate with imipramine was double that experienced with milnacipran . Milnacipran appears to possess equal antidepressant efficacy to imipramine but with markedly superior tolerance . Therefore , milnacipran constitutes an important new treatment option in major depression
There was also some weak evidence to suggest that patients taking milnacipran experienced fewer adverse events of sleepiness/ drowsiness , dry mouth or constipation compared with TCAs .
AUTHORS ' CONCLUSIONS Currently , there is inadequate evidence to conclude whether milnacipran is superior , inferior or the same as other antidepressive agents in terms of efficacy , acceptability and tolerability in the acute phase treatment of major depression .
However , there is some evidence in favour of milnacipran over TCAs in terms of dropouts due to adverse events ( acceptability ) and the rates of experiencing adverse events ( tolerability ) .
Further study is needed to answer whether milnacipran would be the better choice of antidepressant for acute major depression
BACKGROUND Although pharmacological and psychological interventions are both effective for major depression , antidepressant drugs are frequently used as first-line treatment in primary and secondary care setting s. Milnacipran , a dual serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor ( SNRI ) , is one of the antidepressant drugs that clinicians use for routine depression care .
OBJECTIVES To assess the evidence for the efficacy , acceptability and tolerability of milnacipran in comparison with tricyclic antidepressants ( TCAs ) , heterocyclics , SSRIs and other newer antidepressive agents in the acute-phase treatment of major depression .