Conclusion : Systemic changes to academic and funding structures could better support eHealth tool availability and may reduce potential for research waste .
Abstract Introduction : Numerous eHealth tools for pain assessment and management have been developed and evaluated with promising results regarding psychometric properties , efficacy , and effectiveness .
Although considerable re sources are spent on developing and evaluating these tools with the aim of increasing access to care , current evidence suggests they are not made available to end users , reducing their impact and creating potential research waste .
Online psychological treatment for pediatric recurrent pain: a randomized evaluation.
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy of a distance treatment delivered through Internet and telephone for pediatric recurrent pain . METHODS Forty-seven participants ( 9 - 16 years of age ) were r and omly assigned to either an Internet-based treatment or a st and ard medical care waitlist . Treatment employed a Web-based manual for children and parents with weekly therapist contact by telephone or e-mail . At 1- and 3-month follow-ups , participants were assessed on the outcome variables of pain and quality of life . A 50 % reduction in diary pain scores was considered clinical ly significant . RESULTS Significant between-group differences were found : 71 and 72 % of the treatment group achieved clinical ly significant improvement at the 1- and 3-month follow-ups , respectively , whereas only 19 and 14 % of the control group achieved the criterion . No significant differences were found on the quality of life variable . CONCLUSIONS Distance methods have considerable potential for making effective treatments more accessible with lower associated costs
Conclusion : Systemic changes to academic and funding structures could better support eHealth tool availability and may reduce potential for research waste .
Abstract Introduction : Numerous eHealth tools for pain assessment and management have been developed and evaluated with promising results regarding psychometric properties , efficacy , and effectiveness .
Although considerable re sources are spent on developing and evaluating these tools with the aim of increasing access to care , current evidence suggests they are not made available to end users , reducing their impact and creating potential research waste .