High test-retest reliability was found for the Function component , while results for the Disability component were more variable .
Conclusions There is extensive evidence to support the construct validity and sensitivity to change of the LLFDI among various clinical population s of community-dwelling older adults .
Background The choice of measure for use as a primary outcome in geriatric research is contingent upon the construct of interest and evidence for its psychometric properties .
The Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument ( LLFDI ) has been widely used to assess functional limitations and disability in studies with older adults .
The primary aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the current available evidence for the psychometric properties of the LLFDI .
Increased velocity exercise specific to task training versus the National Institute on Aging's strength training program: changes in limb power and mobility.
BACKGROUND This study was design ed to evaluate the benefits of InVEST ( Increased Velocity Specific to Task ) training on limb power and mobility among mobility-limited older adults . METHODS We conducted a single blinded , r and omized controlled trial among 138 mobility-limited community-dwelling older adults , evaluating two 16-week supervised exercise programs . The intervention group participated in InVEST training , and the control group participated in the National Institute on Aging 's ( NIA ) strength training program . Primary outcomes were changes in limb power per kilogram and mobility performance as measured by the Short Physical Performance Battery ( SPPB ) . RESULTS After 16 weeks , InVEST produced significantly greater improvements in limb power than NIA ( p=.02 ) . There was no significant difference in strength improvements . Both groups had significant changes in SPPB of greater than 1 unit . Self-reported function was also significantly improved in both groups . Differences between groups were not statistically different . In a post hoc analysis when participants were categorized by the manifestation of baseline leg velocity impairments ( N=68 ) , InVEST training produced effect size differences in SPPB that were clinical ly meaningful ( SPPB Group x Time difference 0.73 units , p=.05 ) . CONCLUSIONS Among mobility-limited older adults , both NIA and InVEST produce robust changes in observed physical performance and self-reported function . These improvements were not meaningfully different by statistical or clinical criteria . Compared with NIA , InVEST training produced greater improvements in limb power and equivalent improvements in strength . Observed differences between NIA and InVEST based upon baseline leg impairment status are informative for futures studies
High test-retest reliability was found for the Function component , while results for the Disability component were more variable .
Conclusions There is extensive evidence to support the construct validity and sensitivity to change of the LLFDI among various clinical population s of community-dwelling older adults .
Background The choice of measure for use as a primary outcome in geriatric research is contingent upon the construct of interest and evidence for its psychometric properties .
The Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument ( LLFDI ) has been widely used to assess functional limitations and disability in studies with older adults .
The primary aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the current available evidence for the psychometric properties of the LLFDI .