Where data were available , the relative benefits seen held true both after a single or multiple procedure(s ) .
For patients with persistent atrial fibrillation , CA achieves significantly greater freedom from recurrent atrial fibrillation compared with medical therapy .
BACKGROUND Catheter ablation ( CA ) is commonly performed for persistent atrial fibrillation , but few high- quality r and omized controlled trials ( RCTs ) exist , leading to funding restrictions being proposed in several countries .
We performed a r and om-effects meta- analysis of RCTs and non- RCTs to assess the efficacy of CA for persistent atrial fibrillation .
Randomized comparison of encircling and nonencircling left atrial ablation for chronic atrial fibrillation.
BACKGROUND Left atrial ( LA ) circumferential ablation has been reported to eliminate atrial fibrillation ( AF ) . Whether an ablation without encirclement of the pulmonary veins ( PVs ) is as effective as LA circumferential ablation is not clear . OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of LA circumferential ablation and nonencircling linear ablation in patients with chronic AF . METHODS Eighty patients with chronic AF were r and omized to undergo LA circumferential ablation ( n = 40 ) or nonencircling linear ablation ( n = 40 ) . In LA circumferential ablation , the PVs were encircled , with additional lines made in the mitral isthmus and posterior wall or roof . In nonencircling linear ablation , 4 + /- 1 ablation lines were created through areas of complex electrograms , with lines in the roof ( 38 ) , anterior wall ( 36 ) , septum ( 40 ) , mitral isthmus ( 32 ) , and posterior annulus ( 6 ) . The endpoint of LA circumferential ablation and nonencircling linear ablation was voltage abatement . RESULTS LA flutter occurred in 15 % after LA circumferential ablation and in 18 % after nonencircling linear ablation ( P = .8 ) . A repeat ablation procedure was performed for recurrent AF in 7 and 11 patients or for atrial flutter in 6 and 4 patients after LA circumferential ablation and nonencircling linear ablation , respectively ( P = .8 ) . At 9 + /- 4 months , the prevalence of AF was 28 % in the LA circumferential ablation and 25 % in the nonencircling linear ablation group ( P = .8 ) . Sixty-eight percent and 60 % of patients were in sinus rhythm and free of AF and atrial flutter in the absence of antiarrhythmic drug therapy after LA circumferential ablation and nonencircling linear ablation , respectively ( P = .5 ) . There were no complications . CONCLUSION Nonencircling linear ablation and LA circumferential ablation are equally efficacious in eliminating chronic AF . However , the advantage of nonencircling linear ablation is that it eliminates the need for ablation along the posterior wall of the LA . Therefore , nonencircling linear ablation may avoid the small but real risk of atrioesophageal fistula formation associated with LA circumferential ablation
Where data were available , the relative benefits seen held true both after a single or multiple procedure(s ) .
For patients with persistent atrial fibrillation , CA achieves significantly greater freedom from recurrent atrial fibrillation compared with medical therapy .
BACKGROUND Catheter ablation ( CA ) is commonly performed for persistent atrial fibrillation , but few high- quality r and omized controlled trials ( RCTs ) exist , leading to funding restrictions being proposed in several countries .
We performed a r and om-effects meta- analysis of RCTs and non- RCTs to assess the efficacy of CA for persistent atrial fibrillation .