Statistical heterogeneity between included studies was not detected ( chi(2 ) = 1.68 , P = 0.43 , I(2 ) = 0 % ) , although significant clinical differences were found in terms of study design , patient population s , statins use and dosage and AF-monitoring capabilities .
Statins may represent a novel treatment strategy to prevent the occurrence of AF in patients with PM , especially for those who had a PM implanted due to sinus node dysfunction .
Patients with permanent pacemakers ( PM ) are at high risk of developing atrial fibrillation ( AF ) .
Minimal ventricular pacing modalities have been demonstrated to reduce AF in such patients , although they are not suitable for patients with advanced atrioventricular conduction disease .
Recent evidence s suggest that 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors ( i.e. statins ) may represent a new strategy to prevent AF in patients at risk .
In this article , we sought to review data regarding the effectiveness of statin therapy in preventing AF patients with a PM .
Ventricular pacing or dual-chamber pacing for sinus-node dysfunction.
BACKGROUND Dual-chamber ( atrioventricular ) and single-chamber ( ventricular ) pacing are alternative treatment approaches for sinus-node dysfunction that causes clinical ly significant bradycardia . However , it is unknown which type of pacing results in the better outcome . METHODS We r and omly assigned a total of 2010 patients with sinus-node dysfunction to dual-chamber pacing ( 1014 patients ) or ventricular pacing ( 996 patients ) and followed them for a median of 33.1 months . The primary end point was death from any cause or nonfatal stroke . Secondary end points included the composite of death , stroke , or hospitalization for heart failure ; atrial fibrillation ; heart-failure score ; the pacemaker syndrome ; and the quality of life . RESULTS The incidence of the primary end point did not differ significantly between the dual-chamber group ( 21.5 percent ) and the ventricular-paced group ( 23.0 percent , P=0.48 ) . In patients assigned to dual-chamber pacing , the risk of atrial fibrillation was lower ( hazard ratio , 0.79 ; 95 percent confidence interval , 0.66 to 0.94 ; P=0.008 ) , and heart-failure scores were better ( P<0.001 ) . The differences in the rates of hospitalization for heart failure and of death , stroke , or hospitalization for heart failure were not significant in unadjusted analyses but became marginally significant in adjusted analyses . Dual-chamber pacing result ed in a small but measurable increase in the quality of life , as compared with ventricular pacing . CONCLUSIONS In sinus-node dysfunction , dual-chamber pacing does not improve stroke-free survival , as compared with ventricular pacing . However , dual-chamber pacing reduces the risk of atrial fibrillation , reduces signs and symptoms of heart failure , and slightly improves the quality of life . Overall , dual-chamber pacing offers significant improvement as compared with ventricular pacing
Statistical heterogeneity between included studies was not detected ( chi(2 ) = 1.68 , P = 0.43 , I(2 ) = 0 % ) , although significant clinical differences were found in terms of study design , patient population s , statins use and dosage and AF-monitoring capabilities .
Statins may represent a novel treatment strategy to prevent the occurrence of AF in patients with PM , especially for those who had a PM implanted due to sinus node dysfunction .
Patients with permanent pacemakers ( PM ) are at high risk of developing atrial fibrillation ( AF ) .
Minimal ventricular pacing modalities have been demonstrated to reduce AF in such patients , although they are not suitable for patients with advanced atrioventricular conduction disease .
Recent evidence s suggest that 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors ( i.e. statins ) may represent a new strategy to prevent AF in patients at risk .
In this article , we sought to review data regarding the effectiveness of statin therapy in preventing AF patients with a PM .