The sensitivity and specificity of commonly implemented sideline assessment tools are generally good to very good , especially for symptom scores and cognitive evaluations performed within 48 hours of injury , and they are improved when a baseline evaluation is available for comparison .
CONTEXT The sideline assessment of concussion is challenging , given its variable presentations , the limited sensitivity and specificity of sideline assessment tools , and how the presentation of the injury evolves over time .
In addition , the diagnostic process , as well as the tools used to assess and manage concussion , continue to progress as research and what we know about concussion advance .
This paper focuses on the initial assessment on the sideline by review ing the concussion-evaluation literature , drawing from clinical experience to emphasize a st and ardized approach , and underscoring the importance of both familiarity with the athlete and clinical judgment .
OBJECTIVE To review the evidence regarding the clinical assessment of sport-related concussion on the sideline .
Additional considerations included making same-day return-to-play decisions , the sensitivity and specificity of sideline testing , and the importance of ongoing assessment and follow-up of injured athletes .
CONCLUSIONS The sideline assessment of sport-related concussion is challenging given the elusiveness and variability of presentation , reliance on athlete-reported symptoms , and the varying specificity and sensitivity values of sideline assessment tools .
In addition , the recognition of injury and assessment often occur in a time-pressured environment , requiring rapid disposition and decision making .
Examining Sport Concussion Assessment Tool ratings for male and female youth hockey players with and without a history of concussion
Background Concussion is one of the most commonly occurring injuries in sport today . The Sport Concussion Assessment Tool ( SCAT ) is a commonly used paper neurocognitive tool . To date , little is known about SCAT baseline normative values in youth athletes . Objective The purpose of this study was to determine normative values on the SCAT for male and female youth hockey players . Methods This is a secondary data analysis of pooled data from three prospect i ve cohort studies examining the risk of injury in paediatric ice hockey players aged 9–17 years . A preseason baseline demographic and injury history question naire was completed by each player . Results A total of 4193 players completed SCATs at baseline and were included in the analysis . 781 players ( 18.6 % ) reported a previous history of concussion . Fatigue and low energy followed by headache were the most commonly reported symptoms in all players . The majority of youth players could recite all five words immediately but only three words when delayed . A smaller proportion of the males were able to report the months of the year in reverse order compared with females of a similar age . The median number of digits recited in reverse order was 4 . Conclusions Youth ratings varied between age groups , gender and from previously reported ratings of varsity athletes , possibly reflecting developmental and gender differences . An underst and ing of these differences in youth athletes is important to ensure appropriate performance expectations on the SCAT and when making clinical decisions following a concussion
The sensitivity and specificity of commonly implemented sideline assessment tools are generally good to very good , especially for symptom scores and cognitive evaluations performed within 48 hours of injury , and they are improved when a baseline evaluation is available for comparison .
CONTEXT The sideline assessment of concussion is challenging , given its variable presentations , the limited sensitivity and specificity of sideline assessment tools , and how the presentation of the injury evolves over time .
In addition , the diagnostic process , as well as the tools used to assess and manage concussion , continue to progress as research and what we know about concussion advance .
This paper focuses on the initial assessment on the sideline by review ing the concussion-evaluation literature , drawing from clinical experience to emphasize a st and ardized approach , and underscoring the importance of both familiarity with the athlete and clinical judgment .
OBJECTIVE To review the evidence regarding the clinical assessment of sport-related concussion on the sideline .
Additional considerations included making same-day return-to-play decisions , the sensitivity and specificity of sideline testing , and the importance of ongoing assessment and follow-up of injured athletes .
CONCLUSIONS The sideline assessment of sport-related concussion is challenging given the elusiveness and variability of presentation , reliance on athlete-reported symptoms , and the varying specificity and sensitivity values of sideline assessment tools .
In addition , the recognition of injury and assessment often occur in a time-pressured environment , requiring rapid disposition and decision making .