This moderate to large effect size , showing lower ratings of depressed mood in treated patients compared with controls , implicated HRT as a potential treatment of or prophylactic for depression in menopausal women .
One can generalize from the studies review ed here only with great caution , but there is little evidence to support the use of estradiol to improve mood in nondepressed patients ( not surprisingly ) and some evidence to support the antidepressant efficacy of estradiol in perimenopausal but not postmenopausal women
BACKGROUND Controversy regarding the antidepressant efficacy of hormone replacement therapy ( HRT ) stems almost from its inception and reflects the same method ological inconsistencies that have compromised efforts to determine whether the perimenopause is accompanied by an increase in mood symptoms or depression .
Since this publication , multiple studies have aim ed to discern the relationship between HRT and menopausal mood .
METHODS The purpose of this systematic review is to examine the findings and quality of the evidence amassed since Zweifel and O'Brien 's meta- analysis .
Quality-of-life and depressive symptoms in postmenopausal women after receiving hormone therapy: results from the Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study (HERS) trial.
CONTEXT Postmenopausal hormone therapy is commonly used by women for disease prevention , but its effects on quality of life have not been well documented . OBJECTIVE To determine the effect on quality of life of estrogen plus progestin therapy used as secondary prevention in women with coronary artery disease . DESIGN , SETTING , AND PARTICIPANTS A total of 2763 postmenopausal women with documented coronary artery disease ( mean age , 67 years ) in the Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study , a r and omized , placebo-controlled , double-blind trial conducted from January 1993 to July 1998 at outpatient and community setting s at 20 US clinical centers . INTERVENTION Participants were r and omly assigned to receive either 0.625 mg/d of conjugated equine estrogen plus 2.5 mg/d of medroxyprogesterone acetate ( n = 1380 ) or placebo ( n = 1383 ) for 36 months . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Physical activity , measured by the Duke Activity Status Index ; energy/fatigue and mental health , measured by R AND scales ; and depressive symptoms , measured on the Burnam screening scale , at 3 years of follow-up . RESULTS In all patients , scores declined significantly over 3 years for physical function ( -3.8 ; P<.001 ) , mental health ( -0.6 ; P = .05 ) , and energy/fatigue ( -3.8 ; P<.001 ) , but depressive symptoms were not significantly changed ( P = .20 ) . The effect of hormone therapy on these measures depended on the presence ( n = 434 ) or absence ( n = 2325 ) of flushing at study entry . Women with flushing who were assigned to hormone therapy had improved mental health ( + 2.6 vs - 0.5 ; P = .04 ) and fewer depressive symptoms ( -0.5 vs + 0.007 ; P = .01 ) over follow-up compared with those assigned to placebo . Women without flushing who were assigned to hormone therapy had greater declines in physical function ( -4.2 vs -3.3 ; P = .04 ) and energy/fatigue ( -4.6 vs -3.1 ; P = .03 ) over follow-up . Quality -of-life scores were significantly lower among patients with older age , diabetes , hypertension , chest pain , or heart failure . These differences in quality of life among women classified by clinical characteristics were much greater than the effects of hormone therapy . CONCLUSION Hormone therapy has mixed effects on quality of life among older women . The effects of hormone therapy depend on the presence of menopausal symptoms ; women without flushing had greater declines in physical measures , while women with flushing had improvements in emotional measures of quality of life
This moderate to large effect size , showing lower ratings of depressed mood in treated patients compared with controls , implicated HRT as a potential treatment of or prophylactic for depression in menopausal women .
One can generalize from the studies review ed here only with great caution , but there is little evidence to support the use of estradiol to improve mood in nondepressed patients ( not surprisingly ) and some evidence to support the antidepressant efficacy of estradiol in perimenopausal but not postmenopausal women
BACKGROUND Controversy regarding the antidepressant efficacy of hormone replacement therapy ( HRT ) stems almost from its inception and reflects the same method ological inconsistencies that have compromised efforts to determine whether the perimenopause is accompanied by an increase in mood symptoms or depression .
Since this publication , multiple studies have aim ed to discern the relationship between HRT and menopausal mood .
METHODS The purpose of this systematic review is to examine the findings and quality of the evidence amassed since Zweifel and O'Brien 's meta- analysis .