No significant effect was found on cardiovascular events , mortality , diastolic blood pressure , or cholesterol .
Conclusions — We found that lifestyle interventions are effective in lowering systolic blood pressure .
About other end points , this systematic review found no effect of lifestyle interventions on cardiovascular event rate mortality , diastolic blood pressure , or total cholesterol
Background and Purpose — Patients with a transient ischemic attack or ischemic stroke have an increased risk of subsequent cardiovascular events .
The purpose of this systematic review and meta- analysis was to determine whether lifestyle interventions focusing on behaviorally modifiable risk factors with or without an exercise program are effective in terms of ( 1 ) preventing recurrent cardiovascular events , ( 2 ) reducing mortality , and ( 3 ) improving modifiable risk factors associated with cardiovascular disease in patients after a transient ischemic attack or ischemic stroke .
The effectiveness of personalized coronary heart disease and stroke risk communication.
BACKGROUND Current guidelines recommend global risk assessment to guide vascular risk factor management ; however , most provider-patient communication focuses on individual risk factors in isolation . We sought to evaluate the impact of personalized coronary heart disease and stroke risk communication on patients ' knowledge , beliefs , and health behavior . METHODS We conducted a r and omized controlled trial testing personalized risk communication based on Framingham stroke and coronary heart disease risk scores compared with a st and ard risk factor education . A total of 89 patients were recruited from primary care clinics and followed up for 3 months . Outcomes included the following : risk perception and worry , risk factor knowledge , risk reduction preferences and decision conflict , medication adherence , health behaviors , and blood pressure . RESULTS Participants had a very low underst and ing of numeric information , high perceived risk for stroke or myocardial infa rct ion , and high proportion of medication nonadherence . Patients ' ability to identify vascular risk factors increased with personalized risk communication ( mean 1.8 additional risk factors , 95 % CI 1.3 - 2.2 ) and st and ard risk factor education ( mean 1.6 additional risk factors , 95 % CI 1.1 - 2.1 ) immediately after the intervention but was not sustained at 3 months . Patients in the personalized group had less decision conflict than the st and ard risk factor education group over intended risk reduction strategies ( 5.9 vs 10.1 , P = .003 ) . There was no appreciable impact of either communication strategy on medication adherence , exercise , smoking cessation , or blood pressure . CONCLUSIONS Personalized risk communication was preferred by patients and had a small impact on risk reduction preferences and decision conflict but had no impact on patient beliefs or behavior compared with st and ard risk factor education
No significant effect was found on cardiovascular events , mortality , diastolic blood pressure , or cholesterol .
Conclusions — We found that lifestyle interventions are effective in lowering systolic blood pressure .
About other end points , this systematic review found no effect of lifestyle interventions on cardiovascular event rate mortality , diastolic blood pressure , or total cholesterol
Background and Purpose — Patients with a transient ischemic attack or ischemic stroke have an increased risk of subsequent cardiovascular events .
The purpose of this systematic review and meta- analysis was to determine whether lifestyle interventions focusing on behaviorally modifiable risk factors with or without an exercise program are effective in terms of ( 1 ) preventing recurrent cardiovascular events , ( 2 ) reducing mortality , and ( 3 ) improving modifiable risk factors associated with cardiovascular disease in patients after a transient ischemic attack or ischemic stroke .