Overall , there is little direct evidence for components of ERAS , with much derived from nonesophageal thoracoabdominal surgery .
ERAS in principle seems logical and safe for esophagectomy .
OBJECTIVE This article aims to provide the first systematic review of enhanced recovery after surgery ( ERAS ) programs for  esophagectomy  and generate guidelines .
BACKGROUND ERAS programs use multimodal approaches to reduce complications and accelerate recovery .
Although ERAS is well established in colorectal surgery , experience after esophagectomy has been minimal .
However , esophagectomy remains an extremely high-risk operation , commonly performed in patients with significant comorbidities .
Consequently , ERAS may have a significant role to play in improving outcomes .
No guidelines or review s have been published in esophagectomy .
Safety and Usefulness of Intravenous Iron Sucrose in the Management of Preoperative Anemia in Patients with Menorrhagia: A Phase IV, Open-Label, Prospective, Randomized Study
Background : The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy , safety and achievement of the target hemoglobin level ( Hb ≥10 g/dl ) in patients with preoperative anemia due to menorrhagia who received intravenous iron sucrose compared with oral iron protein succinylate for anemia management . Methods : Seventy-six patients with Hb levels < 9.0 g/dl who were scheduled to undergo surgical treatment were r and omized to receive either intravenous iron sucrose ( based on the calculated total iron deficit divided into 2 ampoule infusions intravenously 3 times a week , beginning 3 weeks before surgery ) or oral iron ( 80 mg/day of oral iron protein succinylate daily ) . Results : The intravenous iron group had higher increases in Hb ( 3.0 vs. 0.8 g/dl ; p < 0.0001 ) and ferritin levels ( 170.1 vs. 4.1 μg/l ; p < 0.0001 ) than the oral iron group . Achieving the target Hb was also higher in the intravenous iron group than in the oral iron group ( 76.7 vs. 11.5 % ; p < 0.0001 ) . There were tolerable adverse events in both groups . Conclusion : Preoperative intravenous iron sucrose administration is more effective  than oral iron and is as safe as oral iron therapy in the correction of preoperative anemia due to menorrhagia
Overall , there is little direct evidence for components of ERAS , with much derived from nonesophageal thoracoabdominal surgery .
ERAS in principle seems logical and safe for esophagectomy .
OBJECTIVE This article aims to provide the first systematic review of enhanced recovery after surgery ( ERAS ) programs for  esophagectomy  and generate guidelines .
BACKGROUND ERAS programs use multimodal approaches to reduce complications and accelerate recovery .
Although ERAS is well established in colorectal surgery , experience after esophagectomy has been minimal .
However , esophagectomy remains an extremely high-risk operation , commonly performed in patients with significant comorbidities .
Consequently , ERAS may have a significant role to play in improving outcomes .
No guidelines or review s have been published in esophagectomy .