Several studies of good quality demonstrated changes in lifestyle habits arising from the provision of genetic interventions .
The most promising lifestyle changes were changes in nutrition .
Conclusions : It is possible to facilitate behaviour change using genetic testing as the catalyst .
Background : Study ing the impact of  genetic testing interventions on lifestyle behaviour change  has been a priority area of research in recent years .
Substantial heterogeneity exists in the results and conclusions of this literature , which has yet to be explained using vali date d behaviour change theory and an assessment of the quality of genetic interventions .
The theory of planned behaviour ( TPB ) helps to explain key contributors to behaviour change .
It has been hypothesized that personalization could be added to this theory to help predict changes in health behaviours .
Purpose : This systematic review provides a detailed , comprehensive identification , assessment , and summary of primary research articles pertaining to  lifestyle behaviour change  ( nutrition , physical activity , sleep , and smoking ) result ing from  genetic testing interventions .
The present review further aims to provide in-depth analyses of studies conducted to date within the context of the TPB and the quality of genetic interventions provided to participants while aim ing to determine whether or not genetic testing facilitates changes in lifestyle habits .
This review is timely in light of a recently published “ call-to-action ” paper , highlighting the need to incorporate the TPB into personalized healthcare behaviour change research .
Changes in Physical Activity Following a Genetic-Based Internet-Delivered Personalized Intervention: Randomized Controlled Trial (Food4Me)
Background There is evidence that  physical activity ( PA )  can attenuate the influence of the fat mass- and obesity-associated ( FTO ) genotype on the risk to develop obesity . However , whether providing personalized information on FTO genotype leads to changes in PA is unknown . Objective The purpose of this study was to determine if disclosing FTO risk had an impact on change in PA following a 6-month intervention . Methods The single nucleotide polymorphism ( SNP ) rs9939609 in the FTO gene was genotyped in 1279 participants of the Food4Me study , a four-arm , Web-based r and omized controlled trial ( RCT ) in 7 European countries on the effects of personalized advice on nutrition and PA . PA  was measured objective ly using a TracmorD accelerometer and was self-reported using the Baecke question naire at baseline and 6 months . Differences in baseline PA variables between risk ( AA and AT genotypes ) and nonrisk ( TT genotype ) carriers were tested using multiple linear regression . Impact of FTO risk disclosure on PA change at 6 months was assessed among participants with inadequate PA , by including an interaction term in the model : disclosure ( yes/no ) × FTO risk ( yes/no ) . Results At baseline , data on PA were available for 874 and 405 participants with the risk and nonrisk FTO genotypes , respectively . There were no significant differences in objective ly measured or self-reported baseline PA between risk and nonrisk carriers . A total of 807 ( 72.05 % ) of the participants out of 1120 in the personalized groups were encouraged to increase PA at baseline . Knowledge of FTO risk had no impact on PA in either risk or nonrisk carriers after the 6-month intervention . Attrition was higher in nonrisk participants for whom genotype was disclosed ( P=.01 ) compared with their at-risk counterparts . Conclusions No association between baseline PA and FTO risk genotype was observed . There was no added benefit of disclosing FTO risk on changes in PA in this personalized intervention . Further RCT studies are warranted to confirm whether disclosure of nonrisk genetic test results has adverse effects on engagement in behavior change . Trial Registration Clinical Trials.gov NCT01530139 ; http:// clinical trials.gov/show/NCT01530139 ( Archived by WebCite at : http://www.webcitation.org/6XII1QwHz
Several studies of good quality demonstrated changes in lifestyle habits arising from the provision of genetic interventions .
The most promising lifestyle changes were changes in nutrition .
Conclusions : It is possible to facilitate behaviour change using genetic testing as the catalyst .
Background : Study ing the impact of  genetic testing interventions on lifestyle behaviour change  has been a priority area of research in recent years .
Substantial heterogeneity exists in the results and conclusions of this literature , which has yet to be explained using vali date d behaviour change theory and an assessment of the quality of genetic interventions .
The theory of planned behaviour ( TPB ) helps to explain key contributors to behaviour change .
It has been hypothesized that personalization could be added to this theory to help predict changes in health behaviours .
Purpose : This systematic review provides a detailed , comprehensive identification , assessment , and summary of primary research articles pertaining to  lifestyle behaviour change  ( nutrition , physical activity , sleep , and smoking ) result ing from  genetic testing interventions .
The present review further aims to provide in-depth analyses of studies conducted to date within the context of the TPB and the quality of genetic interventions provided to participants while aim ing to determine whether or not genetic testing facilitates changes in lifestyle habits .
This review is timely in light of a recently published “ call-to-action ” paper , highlighting the need to incorporate the TPB into personalized healthcare behaviour change research .