Conclusions and Relevance Although screening with ECG can detect previously unknown cases of atrial fibrillation , it has not been shown to detect more cases than screening focused on pulse palpation .
Treatments for atrial fibrillation reduce the risk of stroke and all-cause mortality and increase the risk of bleeding , but trials have not assessed whether treatment of screen-detected asymptomatic older adults results in better health outcomes than treatment after detection by usual care or after symptoms develop
Importance Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia and increases the risk of stroke .
Objective To review the evidence on screening for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation with electrocardiography ( ECG ) and stroke prevention treatment in asymptomatic adults 65 years or older to inform the US Preventive Services Task Force .
Is screening for AF worthwhile? Stroke risk in a screened population from the SAFE study.
INTRODUCTION Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is an important independent risk factor for stroke and oral anticoagulation therapy provides a highly effective treatment to reduce this risk . Active screening strategies improve detection of AF in comparison with routine care ; however , whether screen-detected patients have stroke risk profiles favouring anticoagulation is unclear . Using data derived from the screening for AF in the elderly ( SAFE ) study , the aim of this article was to determine if patients with AF detected via active screening  have stroke risk profiles that warrant prophylactic anticoagulation . METHODS Secondary analysis of data derived from 25 general practice s within which cohorts of 200 patients were r and omly allocated to opportunistic [ pulse and electrocardiogram ( ECG ) ] or systematic screening ( postal invitation for ECG ) .  Stroke risk assessment was undertaken using baseline data extracted from medical records and CHADS2 criteria . CHADS2 scores were compared between the screening groups . RESULTS One hundred and forty-nine new cases of AF were detected , 75 via opportunistic screening and 74 via systematic screening . CHADS2 scores were ≥1 in 83 % [ 95 % confidence interval ( CI ) 72.6 - 89.6 ] of patients detected via opportunistic screening and 78 % ( 95 % CI 67.7 - 86.2 ) detected via systematic screening . There were no significant differences in stroke risk profiles of patients detected via opportunistic and systematic screenings . CONCLUSION Stroke risk profiles of patients detected via opportunistic and systematic screenings were similar . Data derived from the SAFE study suggest that active screening for AF in patients aged ≥65 years in primary care is a useful screening programme with 78 - 83 % of patients identified eligible for anticoagulation treatment according to the CHADS2 criteria
Conclusions and Relevance Although screening with ECG can detect previously unknown cases of atrial fibrillation , it has not been shown to detect more cases than screening focused on pulse palpation .
Treatments for atrial fibrillation reduce the risk of stroke and all-cause mortality and increase the risk of bleeding , but trials have not assessed whether treatment of screen-detected asymptomatic older adults results in better health outcomes than treatment after detection by usual care or after symptoms develop
Importance Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia and increases the risk of stroke .
Objective To review the evidence on screening for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation with electrocardiography ( ECG ) and stroke prevention treatment in asymptomatic adults 65 years or older to inform the US Preventive Services Task Force .