In claudication patients , SE is more effective than UE at improving maximal walking and claudication distances , yet there is no difference in general quality of life or patient-reported community-based walking .
BACKGROUND Supervised exercise ( SE ) is widely accepted as an effective therapy for intermittent claudication ( IC ) , but its use is limited by cost .
Unsupervised exercise ( UE ) represents a less costly alternative .
We assessed the comparative effectiveness of SE vs UE in patients with IC .
Long-term effects of structured home-based exercise program on functional capacity and quality of life in patients with intermittent claudication.
OBJECTIVES To evaluate effects of a structured home-based exercise program on functional capacity and quality of life ( QoL ) in patients with intermittent claudication ( IC ) after 1-year follow-up , and to compare these results with those from a concurrent control group who received supervised exercise training ( SET ) . DESIGN Comparative longitudinal cohort study . SETTING Referral center . PARTICIPANTS Patients ( N=142 ) with IC . INTERVENTIONS Structured home-based exercise training or SET . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The maximum ( pain-free ) walking distance and the ankle-brachial index ( ABI ) ( at rest and postexercise ) were measured at baseline and after 6 and 12 months ' follow-up . Additionally , QoL was evaluated using a self-administered question naire consisting of the Euroqol-5D ( scale 0 - 1 ) , rating scale ( scale 0 - 100 ) , Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey ( SF-36 ; scale 0 - 100 ) , and the Vascular Quality of Life Question naire ( VascuQol ; scale 1 - 7 ) . Comparison of the groups was performed with adjustment for the nonr and omized setting using propensity scoring . RESULTS One hundred forty-two patients with IC started the  structured home-based exercise program , of whom 95 ( 67 % ) completed 12 months ' follow-up . The mean relative improvement compared with baseline was statistically significant after 12 months ' follow-up for the maximum and pain-free walking distance ( 342 % , 95 % confidence interval [ CI ] , 169 - 516 ; P<.01 and 338 % , 95 % CI , 42 - 635 ; P=.03 , respectively ) and for the ABI postexercise ( mean change , .06 ; 95 % CI , .01-.10 ; P=.02 ) . For the QoL outcomes , the improvement compared with baseline was statistically significant after 12 months for the VascuQol ( mean change , .42 ; 95 % CI , .20-.65 ; P<.01 ) and for the SF-36 physical functioning ( mean change , 5.17 ; 95 % CI , .77 - 9.56 ; P=.02 ) . Compared with the structured home-based exercise program , patients in the control group showed significantly better results in the mean relative improvement of maximum and pain-free walking distance and change in the ABI at rest after 12 months ' follow-up . CONCLUSIONS Structured home-based exercise training is effective in improving both functional capacity and QoL in patients with IC and may be considered as a feasible and valuable alternative toSET , since supervised exercise programs are not often available
In claudication patients , SE is more effective than UE at improving maximal walking and claudication distances , yet there is no difference in general quality of life or patient-reported community-based walking .
BACKGROUND Supervised exercise ( SE ) is widely accepted as an effective therapy for intermittent claudication ( IC ) , but its use is limited by cost .
Unsupervised exercise ( UE ) represents a less costly alternative .
We assessed the comparative effectiveness of SE vs UE in patients with IC .