Anal stretch has a higher risk of fissure persistence than internal sphincterotomy and also a significantly higher risk of minor incontinence than sphincterotomy .
The combined results of open versus closed partial lateral internal sphincterotomy show little difference between the two procedures both in fissure persistence and risk of incontinence .
AUTHORS ' CONCLUSIONS Anal stretch and posterior midline internal sphincterotomy should probably be ab and oned in the treatment of chronic anal fissure in adults .
For those patients requiring surgery for anal fissure , open and closed partial lateral internal sphincterotomy appear to be equally efficacious .
BACKGROUND Operative techniques commonly used for fissure in ano include : anal stretch , open lateral sphincterotomy , closed lateral sphincterotomy , posterior midline sphincterotomy and to a lesser extent dermal flap coverage of the fissure .
Reports of direct comparisons between operative techniques for anal fissure are variable in their results .
These reports are either subject to selection bias ( in non-r and omized studies ) or observer bias ( in all studies ) or have inadequate numbers of patients enrolled to answer the question of efficacy .
OBJECTIVES To determine the best technique for fissure surgery .
Adequate internal sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissure: Subcutaneous or open technique?
The extent of sphincter division by the subcutaneous or the open technique is examined by comparing the change in anal canal pressure after either method of sphincterotomy in twenty‐eight patients with chronic anal fissure r and omly allocated . In all patients the fissures healed at one month with significant reduction ( P < 0.01 ) of anal canal pressures to 52 ( 17–75 ) cmH2O after subcutaneous and 47.5 ( 35–100 ) cmH2O after open sphincterotomy , a 51 ( 22–77 ) and 50 ( 11–68 ) per cent reduction of their respective pre‐operative measurements . Adequate sphincterotomy can be achieved by both techniques
Anal stretch has a higher risk of fissure persistence than internal sphincterotomy and also a significantly higher risk of minor incontinence than sphincterotomy .
The combined results of open versus closed partial lateral internal sphincterotomy show little difference between the two procedures both in fissure persistence and risk of incontinence .
AUTHORS ' CONCLUSIONS Anal stretch and posterior midline internal sphincterotomy should probably be ab and oned in the treatment of chronic anal fissure in adults .
For those patients requiring surgery for anal fissure , open and closed partial lateral internal sphincterotomy appear to be equally efficacious .
BACKGROUND Operative techniques commonly used for fissure in ano include : anal stretch , open lateral sphincterotomy , closed lateral sphincterotomy , posterior midline sphincterotomy and to a lesser extent dermal flap coverage of the fissure .
Reports of direct comparisons between operative techniques for anal fissure are variable in their results .
These reports are either subject to selection bias ( in non-r and omized studies ) or observer bias ( in all studies ) or have inadequate numbers of patients enrolled to answer the question of efficacy .
OBJECTIVES To determine the best technique for fissure surgery .