No difference was found in the strength of correlation between validation against the most similar construct versus validation against the least similar construct .
It is concluded that the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale ( AIMS ) is the most suitable instrument for the assessment of disabilities in personal care
OBJECTIVES The first aim was to make an inventory of available instruments and question naires for the assessment of  disabilities  in personal care in patients with rheumatic disorders .
The second aim was to investigate which of these instruments have acceptable , method ological quality with regard to reliability , validity and responsiveness .
The third aim was to investigate the assumption that convergent validity results in stronger correlations when vali date d against a more similar construct .
Comparative measurement efficiency and sensitivity of five health status instruments for arthritis research.
Five health status instruments were administered in r and om order to 50 arthritis patients before and after total joint arthroplasty . Relative efficiency and sensitivity in measurement of change in pain , mobility and physical function , social role and social activity , and global health were assessed . The instruments had highly correlated scores , but had differences in certain dimensions . Inter-instrument differentials were larger for social and global outcomes than for pain or mobility . NO single instrument consistently outperformed the others . A method for determining relative efficiency is described
No difference was found in the strength of correlation between validation against the most similar construct versus validation against the least similar construct .
It is concluded that the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale ( AIMS ) is the most suitable instrument for the assessment of disabilities in personal care
OBJECTIVES The first aim was to make an inventory of available instruments and question naires for the assessment of  disabilities  in personal care in patients with rheumatic disorders .
The second aim was to investigate which of these instruments have acceptable , method ological quality with regard to reliability , validity and responsiveness .
The third aim was to investigate the assumption that convergent validity results in stronger correlations when vali date d against a more similar construct .