There was no increased risk of infections with IV iron .
Gastrointestinal AEs were reduced with IV iron .
CONCLUSION Intravenous iron therapy is not associated with an increased risk of SAEs or infections .
Infusion reactions are more pronounced with IV iron
OBJECTIVE To amass all available evidence regarding the safety of intravenous ( IV ) iron preparations to provide a true balance of efficacy and safety .
Intravenous Iron Sucrose in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients with Renal Anemia
Objective To explore the safety and efficacy of intravenous ( IV ) iron sucrose in maintenance peritoneal dialysis ( PD ) . Design R and omized , controlled , parallel-group single-center trial . Setting Blood Purification Center of Chaoyang , Beijing Capital University of Medical Science , China . Methods 46 patients on PD were involved in this trial . 26 patients received IV iron sucrose ( 200 mg iron ) once per week for 4 weeks then once every other week for a further 4 weeks . The other 20 patients received oral ferrous succinate , 200 mg three times per day , for 8 weeks . Hemoglobin , hematocrit , serum ferritin ( SF ) level , and transferrin saturation ( TSAT ) were assessed at baseline and then again after 2 , 4 , and 8 weeks of treatment . Results There were no differences between the IV and oral groups in terms of sex , age , duration of PD , mean dialysate dosage per day , erythropoietin dosage per week , or hematological parameters at baseline . After 4 and 8 weeks of treatment , mean Hb and Hct were significantly increased in the IV group and were also significantly higher than those in the oral group . Levels of SF and TSAT were also significantly increased in the IV group , and significantly higher than in the oral group . After 8 weeks , the response rate in the IV group was 94.8 % , which was significantly higher than that in the oral group . The mean erythropoietin dose was significantly lower in the IV group than in the oral group . Hb , Hct , SF , and TSAT levels were maintained between 4 and 8 weeks in the IV group despite the decrease in dose frequency . There were no adverse events with IV iron . Eight patients in the oral group had adverse gastrointestinal effects . Conclusion IV iron sucrose is safe in PD patients . It increases Hb levels and serum iron parameters more effectively than oral iron ; it is well tolerated and can permit reductions in the required dose of erythropoietin
There was no increased risk of infections with IV iron .
Gastrointestinal AEs were reduced with IV iron .
CONCLUSION Intravenous iron therapy is not associated with an increased risk of SAEs or infections .
Infusion reactions are more pronounced with IV iron
OBJECTIVE To amass all available evidence regarding the safety of intravenous ( IV ) iron preparations to provide a true balance of efficacy and safety .