We found high quality evidence that hormone therapy in both primary and secondary prevention conferred no protective effects for all-cause mortality , cardiovascular death , non-fatal myocardial infa rct ion , angina , or revascularisation .
There was no strong evidence of effect on risk of stroke in this group .
Our review findings provide strong evidence that treatment with hormone therapy in post-menopausal women overall , for either primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease events has little if any benefit and causes an increase in the risk of stroke and venous thromboembolic events
BACKGROUND Evidence from systematic review s of observational studies suggests that hormone therapy may have beneficial effects in reducing the incidence of cardiovascular disease events in post-menopausal women , however the results of r and omised controlled trials ( RCTs ) have had mixed results .
This is an up date d version of a Cochrane review published in 2013 .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of hormone therapy for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in post-menopausal women , and whether there are differential effects between use in primary or secondary prevention .
Secondary aims were to undertake exploratory analyses to ( i ) assess the impact of time since menopause that treatment was commenced ( ≥ 10 years versus < 10 years ) , and where these data were not available , use age of trial participants at baseline as a proxy ( ≥ 60 years of age versus < 60 years of age ) ; and ( ii ) assess the effects of length of time on treatment .
Combination treatment with estrogen and calcitriol in the prevention of age-related bone loss.
Estrogen deficiency and declining calcium absorption due to reduced calcitriol levels or intestinal resistance to calcitriol , are important factors in the pathogenesis of age-related bone loss . The main objective of this study was to examine the effect of estrogen and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D therapy given individually or in combination on  bone loss in elderly women . Four hundred eighty-nine elderly women with normal bone density for their age , aged 65 - 77 yr , were entered into a r and omized double blind , placebo-controlled trial . Women were r and omized to one of four groups : conjugated estrogens ( 0.625 mg , daily ) to women without a uterus ( estrogen replacement therapy ) plus medroxyprogesterone acetate ( 2.5 mg , daily ) to women with a uterus ( hormone replacement therapy ) , calcitriol ( 0.25 microg twice daily ) , a combination of hormone replacement therapy/estrogen replacement therapy plus calcitriol , or placebos for 3 yr . The primary outcome was the change in bone mineral density of the femoral neck and spine . In the intent to treat analysis , hormone therapy ( hormone replacement therapy/estrogen replacement therapy ) produced a mean ( + /-1 SD ) increase in bone mineral density of 2.98 % ( + /-5.45 % ) at the femoral neck ( P < 0.0001 ) and 4.36 % ( + /-6.42 % ) at the spine ( P < 0.0001 ) . There were parallel increases in total hip and trochanter bone mineral density . Calcitriol increased bone mineral density 0.10 % ( + /- 4.27 % ) at the femoral neck ( P = 0.57 ) and 1.65 % ( + /- 4.83 % ) at the spine ( P < 0.0124 ) . The combination of hormone replacement therapy/estrogen replacement therapy + calcitriol  increased bone mineral density 3.80 % ( + /-4.95 % ) at the femoral neck ( P < 0.001 ) , 4.91 % ( + /-6.0 % ) at the spine ( P < 0.0001 ) , and parallel changes at the total hip and trochanter . All three treatment groups differed significantly from placebo at the spine and for the hormone replacement therapy/estrogen replacement therapy groups at the femoral neck , spine , total hip and trochanter . There were no significant differences between combination therapy and hormone replacement therapy/estrogen replacement therapy alone on bone mineral density at any site in the intent to treat analysis . In a secondary analysis of the effect in women who were adherent to treatment , calcitriol had a more significant effect on spine ( P = 0.003 ) and total hip ( P = 0.004 ) . The increase in bone mineral density in the adherent groups of women was always higher compared with the intent to treat groups . Combination therapy compared with hormone replacement therapy/estrogen replacement therapy alone produced a significantly greater response in trochanter ( P = 0.007 ) and total hip bone mineral density ( P = 0.0017 ) . In summary , hormone replacement therapy/estrogen replacement therapy alone and in combination with calcitriol therapy was highly effective in reducing bone resorption and increasing bone mineral density at the hip and other clinical ly relevant sites in a group of elderly women , with normal bone density for their age . Calcitriol was effective in increasing spine bone mineral density . In the adherent women , combination therapy with hormone replacement therapy/estrogen replacement therapy and calcitriol increased bone mineral density significantly more in the total hip and trochanter than did hormone replacement therapy/estrogen replacement therapy alone
We found high quality evidence that hormone therapy in both primary and secondary prevention conferred no protective effects for all-cause mortality , cardiovascular death , non-fatal myocardial infa rct ion , angina , or revascularisation .
There was no strong evidence of effect on risk of stroke in this group .
Our review findings provide strong evidence that treatment with hormone therapy in post-menopausal women overall , for either primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease events has little if any benefit and causes an increase in the risk of stroke and venous thromboembolic events
BACKGROUND Evidence from systematic review s of observational studies suggests that hormone therapy may have beneficial effects in reducing the incidence of cardiovascular disease events in post-menopausal women , however the results of r and omised controlled trials ( RCTs ) have had mixed results .
This is an up date d version of a Cochrane review published in 2013 .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of hormone therapy for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in post-menopausal women , and whether there are differential effects between use in primary or secondary prevention .
Secondary aims were to undertake exploratory analyses to ( i ) assess the impact of time since menopause that treatment was commenced ( ≥ 10 years versus < 10 years ) , and where these data were not available , use age of trial participants at baseline as a proxy ( ≥ 60 years of age versus < 60 years of age ) ; and ( ii ) assess the effects of length of time on treatment .