INTERPRETATION The guidelines have improved method ological reporting in RSA studies , but adherence to these guidelines is still relatively low .
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Guidelines for st and ardization of  radiostereometry ( RSA )  of implants were published in 2005 to facilitate comparison of outcomes between various research groups .
In this systematic review , we determined how well studies have adhered to these guidelines .
Cemented tibial component fixation performs better than cementless fixation
Background The question whether the tibial component of a total knee arthroplasty  should be fixed to bone with or without bone cement has not yet been definitely answered . We studied movements between the tibial component and bone by radiostereometry ( RSA ) in total knee replacement ( TKR ) for 3 different types of fixation : cemented fixation ( C-F ) , uncemented porous fixation ( UC-F ) and uncemented porous hydroxyapatite fixation ( UCHA-F ) . Patients 116 patients with osteoarthrosis , who had 146 TKRs , were included in 2 r and omized series . The first series included 86 unilateral TKRs stratified into 1 of the 3 types of fixation . The second series included 30 patients who had simultaneous bilateral TKR surgery , and who were stratified into 3 subgroups of pairwise comparisons of the 3 types of fixation . Results After 5 years 2 knees had been revised , neither of which were due to loosening . 1 UCHA-F knee in the unilateral series showed a large and continuous migration and a poor clinical result , and is a pending failure . The C-F knees rotated and migrated less than UC-F and UCHA-F knees over 5 years . UCHA-F  migrated less than UC-F after 1 year . Interpretation Cementing of the tibial component offers more stable bone-implant contact for 5 years compared to uncemented fixation . When using uncemented components , however , there is evidence that augmenting a porous surface with hydroxyapatite may mean less motion between implant and bone after the initial postoperative year
INTERPRETATION The guidelines have improved method ological reporting in RSA studies , but adherence to these guidelines is still relatively low .
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Guidelines for st and ardization of  radiostereometry ( RSA )  of implants were published in 2005 to facilitate comparison of outcomes between various research groups .
In this systematic review , we determined how well studies have adhered to these guidelines .