No statistically significant subgroup differences were found according to infant risk of allergy or type of infant feed .
There is some evidence that a prebiotic supplement added to infant feeds may prevent eczema .
It is unclear whether the use of prebiotic should be restricted to infants at high risk of allergy or may have an effect in low risk population s ; or whether it may have an effect on other allergic diseases including asthma
BACKGROUND Prebiotics ( commonly oligosaccharides ) added to infant feeds have the potential to prevent sensitisation of infants to dietary allergens .
OBJECTIVES To determine the effect of prebiotic given to infants for the prevention of allergy .
Neutral and acidic oligosaccharides in preterm infants: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
BACKGROUND Serious infectious morbidity is high in preterm infants .  Enteral supplementation of prebiotics may reduce the incidence of serious infections , especially infections related to the gastrointestinal tract . OBJECTIVE The objective was to determine the effect of enteral supplementation of a prebiotic mixture consisting of neutral oligosaccharides ( (SC)GOS/(LC)FOS ) and acidic oligosaccharides ( AOS ) on serious infectious morbidity in preterm infants . DESIGN In a r and omized controlled trial , preterm infants ( gestational age < 32 wk and /or birth weight < 1500 g ) received enteral supplementation of 80 % (SC)GOS/(LC)FOS and 20 % AOS ( 1.5 g . kg(-1 ) . d(-1 ) ) or placebo ( maltodextrin ) between days 3 and 30 of life . Serious infectious morbidity was defined as a culture positive for sepsis , meningitis , pyelonephritis , or pneumonia . The analysis was performed by intention-to-treat and per- protocol , defined as > or = 50 % supplementation dose during the study period . RESULTS In total , 113 preterm infants were included . Baseline and nutritional characteristics were not different between groups . In the intention-to-treat analysis , the incidence of > or = 1 serious infection , > or = 1 serious endogenous infection , or > or = 2 serious infectious episodes was not significantly different in the (SC)GOS/(LC)FOS/AOS-supplemented and placebo groups . In the per- protocol analysis , there was a trend toward a lower incidence of > or = 1 serious endogenous infection and > or = 2 serious infectious episodes in the (SC)GOS/(LC)FOS/AOS-supplemented group than in the placebo group ( P = 0.09 and P = 0.07 , respectively ) . CONCLUSIONS Enteral supplementation of (SC)GOS/(LC)FOS/AOS does not significantly reduce the risk of serious infectious morbidity in preterm infants . However , there was a trend toward a lower incidence of serious infectious morbidity , especially for infections with endogenous bacteria . This finding suggests a possible beneficial effect that should be evaluated in a larger study . This trial was registered at is rct n.org as IS RCT N16211826
No statistically significant subgroup differences were found according to infant risk of allergy or type of infant feed .
There is some evidence that a prebiotic supplement added to infant feeds may prevent eczema .
It is unclear whether the use of prebiotic should be restricted to infants at high risk of allergy or may have an effect in low risk population s ; or whether it may have an effect on other allergic diseases including asthma
BACKGROUND Prebiotics ( commonly oligosaccharides ) added to infant feeds have the potential to prevent sensitisation of infants to dietary allergens .
OBJECTIVES To determine the effect of prebiotic given to infants for the prevention of allergy .