In predefined subgroup analyses , findings did not vary by surgical approach ( open vs laparoscopic ) or colorectal condition .
CONCLUSIONS : Enhanced recovery protocol s for adults undergoing colorectal surgery improve patient outcomes with no increase in adverse events .
Evidence was insufficient regarding which components , or component combinations , are key to improving patient outcomes .
BACKGROUND : Enhanced surgical recovery protocol s are design ed to reduce hospital length of stay and health care costs .
OBJECTIVE : This study aims to systematic ally review and summarize evidence from r and omized and controlled clinical trials comparing enhanced recovery protocol s versus usual care in  adults undergoing elective colorectal surgery with emphasis on recent trials , protocol components , and subgroups for surgical approach and colorectal condition .
Randomized Trial on Fast Track Care in Colorectal Surgery for Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis.
STUDY OBJECTIVE To study the application of a fast-track care protocol in colorectal surgery for deep infiltrating endometriosis . Bowel endometriosis is an infrequent but not rare condition that often needs intestinal surgery and imposes a high economic burden on society . DESIGN Prospect i ve r and omized trial ( Canadian Task Force classification I ) . SETTING Tertiary referral center . PATIENTS Two hundred twenty-seven patients with preoperative evidence of bowel endometriosis . INTERVENTIONS We r and omly assigned 227 patients with preoperative evidence of bowel endometriosis to a fast-track protocol ( no preoperative bowel preparation , early restoration of diet , no postoperative antibiotics , and early postoperative mobilization ) or conventional care for laparoscopic intestinal surgery . R and omization was obtained on a double-blind , date -based schedule , and all procedures were performed by a homogenous group of expert surgeons . Surgical outcomes and a health economic evaluation were assessed . MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS The primary outcome was hospital stay . Patient 's well-being and intraoperative and postoperative complications up to 30 days after surgery were also assessed . Subsequently , direct medical costs were analyzed . Patients assigned to the fast-track protocol were discharged earlier ( median 3 vs 7 days , p < .001 ) with no significant differences in subjective well-being ( p = .55 ) . Operative details , postoperative complications , and need of temporary ileostomy were similar ( p = .89 ) between groups as well as readmission rates within 30 days ( p = .69 ) . The application of a fast-track protocol result ed in an overall significant reduction of costs ( USD 6699 vs 8674 , p < .01 ) , and differences were more evident in cases of protective stoma ( 7652 vs 8793 , p < .05 ) and surgery with postoperative complications ( 10 835 vs 14 005 , p < .01 ) . CONCLUSION The application of a fast-track care protocol for laparoscopy in cases of pelvic and intestinal endometriosis does not increase the risk of complications and ensures a reduction of medical costs
In predefined subgroup analyses , findings did not vary by surgical approach ( open vs laparoscopic ) or colorectal condition .
CONCLUSIONS : Enhanced recovery protocol s for adults undergoing colorectal surgery improve patient outcomes with no increase in adverse events .
Evidence was insufficient regarding which components , or component combinations , are key to improving patient outcomes .
BACKGROUND : Enhanced surgical recovery protocol s are design ed to reduce hospital length of stay and health care costs .
OBJECTIVE : This study aims to systematic ally review and summarize evidence from r and omized and controlled clinical trials comparing enhanced recovery protocol s versus usual care in  adults undergoing elective colorectal surgery with emphasis on recent trials , protocol components , and subgroups for surgical approach and colorectal condition .