Although the convergent validity of ImPACT was supported , evidence of discriminant and predictive validity , diagnostic accuracy and responsiveness was inconclusive .
The review found many factors influenced the validity and utility of ImPACT scores .
Background The immediate post concussion assessment and cognitive testing ( ImPACT ) is the most widely used concussion assessment tool .
Despite its popularity , it is unclear if validation studies for the ImPACT test covered all aspects of validity to support its widespread use in research and clinical practice .
Objective The purpose of this report is to review literature surrounding the validity and the utility of the ImPACT test .
Prevalence of neurocognitive and balance deficits in collegiate aged football players without clinically diagnosed concussion.
STUDY DESIGN Prospect i ve cohort . OBJECTIVES To identify the prevalence of neurocognitive and balance deficits in collegiate football players 48 hours following competition . BACKGROUND Neurocognitive testing , balance assessment s , and subjective report of symptoms are a commonly used test battery in examining athletes when concussion is suspected . Previous literature suggests many concussions go unreported . Little research exists examining the prevalence of neurocognitive or balance deficits in athletes who do not report concussion-like symptoms to a health care provider . METHODS Forty-five Division IA collegiate football players participated in this study . Preseason baseline scores using the  Balance Error Scoring System , the Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing , and the Postconcussion Symptom Scale  were compared to posttest results obtained 48 hours following a game . Prevalence of symptoms was analyzed and reported . RESULTS Thirty-two ( 71 % ) of the 45 athletes tested demonstrated at least 1 deficit in either the Postconcussion Symptom Scale , Balance Error Scoring System , or at least 1 composite score of the Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing . Nineteen of the 32 subjects demonstrated a change in 2 or more categories of neurocognitive and balance function . CONCLUSION In a cohort of football players tested 48 hours following their last game of the season , who did not seek medical attention related to a concussion , a significant number demonstrated limitations in neurocognitive and balance performance , suggesting that further research may need to be performed to improve recognition of an athlete 's deficits and to improve the ability to assess concussion . LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Differential diagnosis/symptom prevalence , level 3b
Although the convergent validity of ImPACT was supported , evidence of discriminant and predictive validity , diagnostic accuracy and responsiveness was inconclusive .
The review found many factors influenced the validity and utility of ImPACT scores .
Background The immediate post concussion assessment and cognitive testing ( ImPACT ) is the most widely used concussion assessment tool .
Despite its popularity , it is unclear if validation studies for the ImPACT test covered all aspects of validity to support its widespread use in research and clinical practice .
Objective The purpose of this report is to review literature surrounding the validity and the utility of the ImPACT test .