Total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol were reduced in all trials but there was evidence of heterogeneity of effects .
There was no evidence of any serious harm caused by statin prescription .
Evidence available to date showed that primary prevention with statins is likely to be cost-effective and may improve patient quality of life .
Recent findings from the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists study using individual patient data meta- analysis indicate that these benefits are similar in people at lower ( < 1 % per year ) risk of a major cardiovascular event .
AUTHORS ' CONCLUSIONS Reductions in all-cause mortality , major vascular events and revascularisations were found with no excess of adverse events among people without evidence of CVD treated with statins
BACKGROUND Reducing high blood cholesterol , a risk factor for cardiovascular disease ( CVD ) events in people with and without a past history of CVD is an important goal of pharmacotherapy .
Statins are the first-choice agents .
Previous review s of the effects of statins have highlighted their benefits in people with CVD .
The case for primary prevention was uncertain when the last version of this review was published ( 2011 ) and in light of new data an up date of this review is required .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects , both harms and benefits , of statins in people with no history of CVD .
Pravastatin in elderly individuals at risk of vascular disease (PROSPER): a randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND Although statins reduce coronary and cerebrovascular morbidity and mortality in middle-aged individuals , their efficacy and safety in elderly people is not fully established . Our aim was to test the benefits of pravastatin treatment in an elderly cohort of men and women with , or at high risk of developing , cardiovascular disease and stroke . METHODS We did a r and omised controlled trial in which we assigned 5804 men ( n=2804 ) and women ( n=3000 ) aged 70 - 82 years with a history of , or risk factors for , vascular disease to pravastatin ( 40 mg per day ; n=2891 ) or placebo ( n=2913 ) . Baseline cholesterol concentrations ranged from 4.0 mmol/L to 9.0 mmol/L. Follow-up was 3.2 years on average and our primary endpoint was a composite of coronary death , non-fatal myocardial infa rct ion , and fatal or non-fatal stroke . Analysis was by intention-to-treat . FINDINGS Pravastatin lowered LDL cholesterol concentrations by 34 % and reduced the incidence of the primary endpoint to 408 events compared with 473 on placebo ( hazard ratio 0.85 , 95 % CI 0.74 - 0.97 , p=0.014 ) . Coronary heart disease death and non-fatal myocardial infa rct ion risk was also reduced ( 0.81 , 0.69 - 0.94 , p=0.006 ) . Stroke risk was unaffected ( 1.03 , 0.81 - 1.31 , p=0.8 ) , but the hazard ratio for transient ischaemic attack was 0.75 ( 0.55 - 1.00 , p=0.051 ) . New cancer diagnoses were more frequent on pravastatin than on placebo ( 1.25 , 1.04 - 1.51 , p=0.020 ) . However , incorporation of this finding in a meta- analysis of all pravastatin and all statin trials showed no overall increase in risk . Mortality from coronary disease fell by 24 % ( p=0.043 ) in the pravastatin group . Pravastatin had no significant effect on cognitive function or disability . INTERPRETATION Pravastatin given for 3 years reduced the risk of coronary disease in elderly individuals . PROSPER therefore extends to elderly individuals the treatment strategy currently used in middle aged people
Total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol were reduced in all trials but there was evidence of heterogeneity of effects .
There was no evidence of any serious harm caused by statin prescription .
Evidence available to date showed that primary prevention with statins is likely to be cost-effective and may improve patient quality of life .
Recent findings from the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists study using individual patient data meta- analysis indicate that these benefits are similar in people at lower ( < 1 % per year ) risk of a major cardiovascular event .
AUTHORS ' CONCLUSIONS Reductions in all-cause mortality , major vascular events and revascularisations were found with no excess of adverse events among people without evidence of CVD treated with statins
BACKGROUND Reducing high blood cholesterol , a risk factor for cardiovascular disease ( CVD ) events in people with and without a past history of CVD is an important goal of pharmacotherapy .
Statins are the first-choice agents .
Previous review s of the effects of statins have highlighted their benefits in people with CVD .
The case for primary prevention was uncertain when the last version of this review was published ( 2011 ) and in light of new data an up date of this review is required .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects , both harms and benefits , of statins in people with no history of CVD .