Although additional well design ed , worldwide , placebo-controlled and r and omized studies are necessary to confirm the long-term outcomes of naftopidil pharmacotherapy , current data suggest that naftopidil administration in BPH patients provides comparable improvements in total IPSS , QoL , and urinary symptoms from baseline relative to 0.2 mg/d tamsulosin and 8 mg/d silodosin .
However , improvements in Qmax are generally less with naftopidil than with tamsulosin .
Reported adverse effects related to naftopidil administration are negligible and usually mild .
OBJECTIVES The aim of the study was to systematic ally review the effects of the adrenoreceptor A1D antagonist naftopidil in the management of  lower urinary tract symptoms ( LUTS ) .
Clinical effect of naftopidil on the quality of life of patients with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a prospective study.
OBJECTIVES To investigate the benefit of alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonist naftopidil on the quality of life ( QOL ) of patients with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia ( BPH/LUTS ) . METHODS A total of 99 men with BPH/LUTS were prospect ively recruited . The Short Form-8 ( SF-8 ) was used for generic QOL assessment and each parameter was compared with the norm in these patients . Longitudinal changes were evaluated using the SF-8 and the International Prostatic Symptoms Score ( I-PSS ) at baseline , 4 and 8 weeks after naftopidil administration . The relationship between SF-8 and I-PSS was analyzed . RESULTS Five of eight components in the SF-8 were significantly lower than the Japanese national norm at baseline . SF-8 score was improved by naftopidil at 4 and 8 weeks in general health ( GH ) and physical component summary ( PCS ) in the patients in their 70s . Mental health ( MH ) and mental component summary ( MCS ) were improved at 8 weeks in patients in their 60s . When analyzing the whole cohort , SF-8 GH , role emotional ( RE ) and MH had improved at 8 weeks , which was similar to the norm , and bodily pain ( BP ) results were better . Compared with the baseline , total I-PSS , storage/voiding symptoms and QOL index scores improved significantly under naftopidil . Each component of I-PSS ( except for hesitancy ) correlated with SF-8 sub-scales ( except for BP ) to some extent . CONCLUSIONS BPH/LUTS impairs generic QOL , which is improved by naftopidil treatment . SF-8 can be a useful instrument to assess the efficacy of BPH/LUTS treatment because its simplicity to complete and analyze , and its meaningful relationship to I-PSS
Although additional well design ed , worldwide , placebo-controlled and r and omized studies are necessary to confirm the long-term outcomes of naftopidil pharmacotherapy , current data suggest that naftopidil administration in BPH patients provides comparable improvements in total IPSS , QoL , and urinary symptoms from baseline relative to 0.2 mg/d tamsulosin and 8 mg/d silodosin .
However , improvements in Qmax are generally less with naftopidil than with tamsulosin .
Reported adverse effects related to naftopidil administration are negligible and usually mild .
OBJECTIVES The aim of the study was to systematic ally review the effects of the adrenoreceptor A1D antagonist naftopidil in the management of  lower urinary tract symptoms ( LUTS ) .