In particular , there is little evidence that the identified tools would be good at detecting change in intervention studies .
The obvious gaps in available outcome measurement include well-being and participation outcomes for children , and family quality -of-life outcomes , domains particularly valued by our informants ( young people with ASD and parents ) .
This is the first systematic review of the quality and appropriateness of tools design ed to monitor progress and outcomes of young children with ASD .
BACKGROUND The needs of children with autism spectrum disorder ( ASD ) are complex and this is reflected in the number and diversity of outcomes assessed and measurement tools used to collect evidence about children 's progress .
Relevant outcomes include improvement in core ASD impairments , such as communication , social awareness , sensory sensitivities and repetitiveness ; skills such as social functioning and play ; participation outcomes such as social inclusion ; and parent and family impact .
OBJECTIVES To examine the measurement properties of tools used to measure progress and outcomes in children with ASD up to the age of 6 years .
To identify outcome areas regarded as important by people with ASD and parents .
Randomized Controlled Trial for Early Intervention for Autism: A Pilot Study of the Autism 1-2-3 Project
We piloted a 2-week “ Autism-1 - 2 - 3 ” early intervention for children with autism and their parents immediately after diagnosis that targeted at ( 1 ) eye contact , ( 2 ) gesture and ( 3 ) vocalization/words .  Seventeen children were r and omized into the Intervention ( n = 9 ) and Control ( n = 8) groups . Outcome measures included the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule , Ritvo-Freeman Real Life Rating Scale , Symbolic Play Test , and Parenting Stress Index .  Children with autism improved in language /communication , reciprocal social interaction , and symbolic play . Parents perceived significant improvement in their children ’s language , social interaction , and their own stress level . This intervention can serve as short-term training on communication and social interaction for children with autism , and reduce the stress of their parents during the long waiting time for public health services
In particular , there is little evidence that the identified tools would be good at detecting change in intervention studies .
The obvious gaps in available outcome measurement include well-being and participation outcomes for children , and family quality -of-life outcomes , domains particularly valued by our informants ( young people with ASD and parents ) .
This is the first systematic review of the quality and appropriateness of tools design ed to monitor progress and outcomes of young children with ASD .
BACKGROUND The needs of children with autism spectrum disorder ( ASD ) are complex and this is reflected in the number and diversity of outcomes assessed and measurement tools used to collect evidence about children 's progress .
Relevant outcomes include improvement in core ASD impairments , such as communication , social awareness , sensory sensitivities and repetitiveness ; skills such as social functioning and play ; participation outcomes such as social inclusion ; and parent and family impact .
OBJECTIVES To examine the measurement properties of tools used to measure progress and outcomes in children with ASD up to the age of 6 years .
To identify outcome areas regarded as important by people with ASD and parents .