Conclusions ART single-surface restorations  presented high survival percentages in both primary and permanent posterior teeth , whilst ART multiple-surface restorations presented lower survival percentages .
ART sealants presented a high-caries-preventive effect .
Clinical relevance ART is an effective evidence -based option for treating and preventing carious lesions in primary and permanent posterior teeth
Objective The aim of the present study is to up date the results of two previous meta-analyses , published in 2006 and 2012 , on the survival percentages of  atraumatic restorative treatment ( ART ) restorations and ART sealants .
The current meta- analysis includes Chinese publications not investigated before .
Clinical evaluation of multiple-surface ART restorations: 12 month follow-up.
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of multiple-surface restorations employing 2 different glass ionomer cements ( GICs ) and the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment ( ART ) approach in permanent molar teeth . METHODS This study examined 60 restorations--36 Class I restorations involving 2 or more tooth surfaces and 24 Class II restorations -- that were placed in 46 schoolchildren ( 9 - 16 years of age ) by 2 dentists using the ART approach . The restorations were r and omly divided into 2 groups : ( a ) 30 cavities were filled with high strength GIC ( Ketac Molar-3 M ESPE ) , and ( b ) 30 cavities were filled with resin-modified GIC ( Fuji VIII-GC Corp ) . Two independent calibrated examiners carried out the evaluations according to ART criteria . The interexaminer kappa was 0.92 . Data were su bmi tted to chi-square , McNemar , and Fisher 's tests . A difference was statistically significant if P<.05 . RESULTS In a 12-month follow-up , 59 restorations were evaluated . The success rates of the restorations were 100 % and 93 % for Fuji VIII and Ketac Molar , respectively . There was no statistically significant difference between GICs , cavity types , or operators . CONCLUSIONS Based on a 12-month follow-up evaluation , the clinical performance of the multiple-surface atraumatic restorative treatment restorations of both glass ionomer cements ( high-strength and resin-modified ) was considered satisfactory with a high success rate
Conclusions ART single-surface restorations  presented high survival percentages in both primary and permanent posterior teeth , whilst ART multiple-surface restorations presented lower survival percentages .
ART sealants presented a high-caries-preventive effect .
Clinical relevance ART is an effective evidence -based option for treating and preventing carious lesions in primary and permanent posterior teeth
Objective The aim of the present study is to up date the results of two previous meta-analyses , published in 2006 and 2012 , on the survival percentages of  atraumatic restorative treatment ( ART ) restorations and ART sealants .
The current meta- analysis includes Chinese publications not investigated before .