The sensitivity and specificity of commonly implemented sideline assessment tools are generally good to very good , especially for symptom scores and cognitive evaluations performed within 48 hours of injury , and they are improved when a baseline evaluation is available for comparison .
CONTEXT The sideline assessment of concussion is challenging , given its variable presentations , the limited sensitivity and specificity of sideline assessment tools , and how the presentation of the injury evolves over time .
In addition , the diagnostic process , as well as the tools used to assess and manage concussion , continue to progress as research and what we know about concussion advance .
This paper focuses on the initial assessment on the sideline by review ing the concussion-evaluation literature , drawing from clinical experience to emphasize a st and ardized approach , and underscoring the importance of both familiarity with the athlete and clinical judgment .
OBJECTIVE To review the evidence regarding the clinical assessment of sport-related concussion on the sideline .
Additional considerations included making same-day return-to-play decisions , the sensitivity and specificity of sideline testing , and the importance of ongoing assessment and follow-up of injured athletes .
CONCLUSIONS The sideline assessment of sport-related concussion is challenging given the elusiveness and variability of presentation , reliance on athlete-reported symptoms , and the varying specificity and sensitivity values of sideline assessment tools .
In addition , the recognition of injury and assessment often occur in a time-pressured environment , requiring rapid disposition and decision making .
Acute Effects and Recovery After Sport‐Related Concussion: A Neurocognitive and Quantitative Brain Electrical Activity Study
Objective To investigate the clinical utility and sensitivity of a portable , automatic , frontal quantitative electroencephalographic ( QEEG ) acquisition device currently in development in detecting abnormal brain electrical activity after sport-related concussion . Design This was a prospect i ve , non-r and omized study of 396 high school and college football players , including cohorts of 28 athletes with concussion and 28 matched controls . All subjects underwent preseason baseline testing on measures of postconcussive symptoms , postural stability , and cognitive functioning , as well as QEEG . Clinical testing and QEEG were repeated on day of injury and days 8 and 45 postinjury for the concussion and control groups . Main Outcomes and Results The injured group reported more significant postconcussive symptoms during the first 3 days postinjury , which resolved by days 5 and 8 . Injured subjects also performed poorer than controls on neurocognitive testing on the day of injury , but no differences were evident on day 8 or day 45 . QEEG studies revealed significant abnormalities in electrical brain activity in the injured group on day of injury and day 8 postinjury , but not on day 45 . Conclusions Results from the current study on clinical recovery after sport-related concussion are consistent with early reports indicating a typical course of full recovery in symptoms and cognitive dysfunction within the first week of injury . QEEG results , however , suggest that the duration of physiological recovery after concussion may extend longer than observed clinical recovery . Further study is required to replicate and extend these findings in a larger clinical sample , and further demonstrate the utility of QEEG as a marker of recovery after sport-related concussion
The sensitivity and specificity of commonly implemented sideline assessment tools are generally good to very good , especially for symptom scores and cognitive evaluations performed within 48 hours of injury , and they are improved when a baseline evaluation is available for comparison .
CONTEXT The sideline assessment of concussion is challenging , given its variable presentations , the limited sensitivity and specificity of sideline assessment tools , and how the presentation of the injury evolves over time .
In addition , the diagnostic process , as well as the tools used to assess and manage concussion , continue to progress as research and what we know about concussion advance .
This paper focuses on the initial assessment on the sideline by review ing the concussion-evaluation literature , drawing from clinical experience to emphasize a st and ardized approach , and underscoring the importance of both familiarity with the athlete and clinical judgment .
OBJECTIVE To review the evidence regarding the clinical assessment of sport-related concussion on the sideline .
Additional considerations included making same-day return-to-play decisions , the sensitivity and specificity of sideline testing , and the importance of ongoing assessment and follow-up of injured athletes .
CONCLUSIONS The sideline assessment of sport-related concussion is challenging given the elusiveness and variability of presentation , reliance on athlete-reported symptoms , and the varying specificity and sensitivity values of sideline assessment tools .
In addition , the recognition of injury and assessment often occur in a time-pressured environment , requiring rapid disposition and decision making .