The fact that most MAs on results from RCTs did not show a beneficial effect does not disprove the hypothesis suggested by observational findings on adverse health outcomes of low 25OHD levels
Background A large number of observational studies have reported harmful effects of low 25-hydroxyvitamin D ( 25OHD ) levels on non-skeletal outcomes .
We performed a systematic quantitative review on characteristics of r and omized clinical trials ( RCTs ) included in meta-analyses ( MAs ) on non-skeletal effects of vitamin D supplementation .
Are Clinical Trials the “Gold Standard” for Cancer Prevention Research?
Most cancer epidemiologists would cite results from a r and omized clinical trial as both the ultimate arbiter of controversial findings from observational studies and the basis for cancer control interventions . Indeed , we consider a trial definitive when its intervention demonstrably lowers
The fact that most MAs on results from RCTs did not show a beneficial effect does not disprove the hypothesis suggested by observational findings on adverse health outcomes of low 25OHD levels
Background A large number of observational studies have reported harmful effects of low 25-hydroxyvitamin D ( 25OHD ) levels on non-skeletal outcomes .
We performed a systematic quantitative review on characteristics of r and omized clinical trials ( RCTs ) included in meta-analyses ( MAs ) on non-skeletal effects of vitamin D supplementation .