Complication rates , including cardiac tamponade , did not differ between groups .
Compared with the use of other catheters , AF ablation using the CF-sensing ST catheter for AF is associated with improved success rates , shorter procedure and fluoroscopy times and similar safety profile
OBJECTIVES The objective of our review was to systematic ally assess available evidence on the effectiveness , safety and efficiency of a spring sensor-irrigated contact force ( CF ) catheter ( THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH Catheter ( ST ) ) for percutaneous ablation of paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation ( AF ) , compared with other ablation catheters , or with the ST with the operator blinded to CF data .
BACKGROUND Emerging evidence suggests improved clinical outcomes of AF ablation using CF-sensing catheters ; however , review s to date have included data from multiple , distinct CF technologies .
Influence of energy source on early atrial fibrillation recurrences: a comparison of cryoballoon vs. radiofrequency current energy ablation with the endpoint of unexcitability in pulmonary vein isolation
Introduction Comparative data of early recurrence rates of atrial fibrillation ( ERAF )  following second-generation cryoballoon ( CB-G2 ) and radiofrequency current ( RFC ) ablation for pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) in paroxysmal AF ( PAF ) are rare . We r and omized PAF patients into either PVI with CB-G2 ( group 1 ) or PVI with a combined RFC-approach applying contact force ( CF ) with the endpoint of unexcitability ( group 2 ) to investigate ERAF . Methods and results In group 1 ( n = 30 ) , CB-G2-PVI was performed . After CF-PVI in group 2 ( n = 30 ) , bipolar pacing on the ablation line and additional ablation until unexcitability was conducted . Follow-up included 48 h of in-hospital monitoring followed by 5-day Holter ECGs 1 , 2 , 3 , 6 , 12 months postablation to evaluate ERAF . Acute PVI was reached in 100 % of group 2 and in 99 % of group 1 . Shorter procedure duration s ( 98.0 ± 21.9 vs. 114.3 ± 18.7 min , P < 0.05 ) but extended fluoroscopy times ( 15.4 ± 3.9 vs. 10.0 ± 4.3 min , P < 0.05 ) were found in the CB-G2 group . Ten non-severe complications occurred ( 6 vs. 4 in group 1 and 2 , P = 0.73 ) . In group 2 , five patients suffered from ERAF vs. seven patients in group 1 ( P = 0.67 ) . The time until the occurrence of ERAF was shorter in group 2 ( 1 day ( q1-q3 : 1 - 4.5 ) ) when compared with group 1 ( 22 ( q1-q3 : 6 - 54 ) days , P = 0.025 ) . Conclusion ERAF rates were equal among groups ; however , they occurred earlier in the initial phase after RFC ablation when compared with CB-G2 . PVI utilizing cryoablation is associated with shorter procedure duration s but extended fluoroscopy time while being similarly secure
Complication rates , including cardiac tamponade , did not differ between groups .
Compared with the use of other catheters , AF ablation using the CF-sensing ST catheter for AF is associated with improved success rates , shorter procedure and fluoroscopy times and similar safety profile
OBJECTIVES The objective of our review was to systematic ally assess available evidence on the effectiveness , safety and efficiency of a spring sensor-irrigated contact force ( CF ) catheter ( THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH Catheter ( ST ) ) for percutaneous ablation of paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation ( AF ) , compared with other ablation catheters , or with the ST with the operator blinded to CF data .
BACKGROUND Emerging evidence suggests improved clinical outcomes of AF ablation using CF-sensing catheters ; however , review s to date have included data from multiple , distinct CF technologies .