Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
High-intensity training following lung cancer surgery: a randomised controlled trial
Background Many patients with lung cancer are deconditioned with poor physical fitness . Lung resection reduces physical fitness further , impairing the patient 's ability to function in daily life . Methods We conducted a single-blind r and omised controlled trial of high-intensity endurance and strength training ( 60 min , three times a week , 20 weeks ) , starting 5–7 weeks after surgery . The control group received st and ard postoperative care . The primary outcome was the change in peak oxygen uptake measured directly during walking until exhaustion . Other outcomes included changes in pulmonary function , muscular strength by one-repetition maximum ( 1RM ) , total muscle mass measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry , daily physical functioning and quality of life ( QoL ) . Results The intention-to-treat analysis of the 61 r and omised patients showed that the exercise group had a greater increase in peak oxygen uptake ( 3.4 mL/kg/min between-group difference , p=0.002 ) , carbon monoxide transfer factor ( Tlco ) ( 5.2 % predicted , p=0.007 ) , 1RM leg press ( 29.5 kg , p<0.001 ) , chair st and ( 2.1 times p<0.001 ) , stair run ( 4.3 steps , p=0.002 ) and total muscle mass ( 1.36 kg , p=0.012 ) compared with the controls . The mean±SD QoL ( SF-36 ) physical component summary score was 51.8±5.5 and 43.3±11.3 ( p=0.006 ) , and the mental component summary score was 55.5±5.3 and 46.6±14.0 ( p=0.015 ) in the exercise and control groups , respectively . Conclusions In patients recently operated for lung cancer , high-intensity endurance and strength training was well tolerated and induced clinical ly significant improvements in peak oxygen uptake , Tlco , muscular strength , total muscle mass , functional fitness and QoL. This study may provide a basis for exercise therapy after lung cancer surgery . Trial registration number NCT01748981
Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?