Qualitative analysis indicated moderate evidence for repeatability of the 6MWT in patients undergoing cardiac rehabilitation , for a 2 % to 8 % learning effect between repeated 6MWTs , for a relationship between peak heart rate during the 6MWT and during cycle exercise at the ventilatory threshold , and for moderate-to-high correlation between the 6-minute walk distance and maximum metabolic equivalents achieved on symptom-limited exercise tests .
Strong evidence suggests that the 6MWT is responsive to clinical change following cardiac rehabilitation .
BACKGROUND The  6-minute walk test ( 6MWT ) is a common outcome measurement in cardiac rehabilitation .
However , a search of the literature found no established guidelines for use of the 6MWT in cardiac rehabilitation .
OBJECTIVES Systematic review of the validity , reliability and responsiveness of the 6MWT in cardiac rehabilitation .
Repeat six-minute walk tests in patients with chronic heart failure: are they clinically necessary?
Background : Owing to a reported learning effect in patients with chronic cardiopulmonary disease , performance of at least two six-minute walk tests ( 6MWT ) are recommended as st and ard practice . Patients with chronic heart failure ( CHF ) are typically elderly and frail and it is unknown whether current guidelines are practical in a clinical setting . Aims : The aim of this study was to determine whether repeat performance of 6MWTs in patients with CHF is related to between-test interval or baseline performance . Methods : This was a multisite observational study enrolling participants entering into heart failure rehabilitation programmes . Participants performed two 6MWTs with r and omly allocated inter-test intervals between 15 and 90 minutes . Distance walked in the second test was compared with the first test using a paired t test . Results : Eighty-eight participants ( 45 females , age 65 ± 14 years ) with stable CHF were enrolled . Mean distance walked increased from 301 metres in test 1 to 313 metres in test 2 ( p < 0.001 ) . No significant change was recorded between test 1 and test 2 for those whose baseline distance was < 300 metres . The interval between tests had no significant effect on the distance walked . Conclusion : The change in 6MWT distance was significantly associated with better baseline performance but not with the interval between tests
Qualitative analysis indicated moderate evidence for repeatability of the 6MWT in patients undergoing cardiac rehabilitation , for a 2 % to 8 % learning effect between repeated 6MWTs , for a relationship between peak heart rate during the 6MWT and during cycle exercise at the ventilatory threshold , and for moderate-to-high correlation between the 6-minute walk distance and maximum metabolic equivalents achieved on symptom-limited exercise tests .
Strong evidence suggests that the 6MWT is responsive to clinical change following cardiac rehabilitation .
BACKGROUND The  6-minute walk test ( 6MWT ) is a common outcome measurement in cardiac rehabilitation .
However , a search of the literature found no established guidelines for use of the 6MWT in cardiac rehabilitation .
OBJECTIVES Systematic review of the validity , reliability and responsiveness of the 6MWT in cardiac rehabilitation .