There is limited evidence to suggest which ablation method was the best .
There is limited evidence to suggest that CA may be a better treatment option compared to medical therapies in the management of persistent AF .
This review was also unable to recommend the best CA method
BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia seen in cardiovascular departments .
Treatments include medical interventions and catheter ablation .
Due to uncertainties in medical therapies for AF , and the need to continue sinus rhythm , ablation has been recently considered as a viable alternative .
Many new ablation methods based on pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) have been developed .
OBJECTIVES The primary objective of this review was to assess the beneficial and harmful effects of  catheter ablation ( CA ) in comparison with medical treatment in patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF .
The secondary objective was to determine the best regimen of CA .
A prospective, multicenter evaluation of ablating complex fractionated electrograms (CFEs) during atrial fibrillation (AF) identified by an automated mapping algorithm: acute effects on AF and efficacy as an adjuvant strategy.
BACKGROUND Complex fractionated electrograms ( CFEs ) are continuous electrograms ( EGMs ) of very short cycle length ( CL ) representing substrate for atrial fibrillation ( AF ) perpetuation . Ablation of CFEs may result in AF slowing , termination , and prevention , but identifying them can be subjective . OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to prospect ively assess ( 1 ) whether an automated algorithm can identify CFE regions , ( 2 ) the acute effects of ablating these regions on AF , and ( 3 ) the long-term efficacy as an adjuvant strategy to pulmonary vein antrum isolation ( PVAI ) . METHODS Thirty-five patients ( three centers , 61 + /- 9 years , left atrium [ LA ] 43 + /- 9 mm , ejection fraction 53 % + /- 7 % ) with symptomatic paroxysmal ( n = 21 ) or persistent ( n = 14 ) AF were studied . A decapolar lasso ( 2-mm spacing ) was used for mapping . A three-dimensional shell of the LA and pulmonary veins ( PVs ) was created . If not already in AF , AF was induced by burst pacing ( with or without isoproterenol ) . Atrial EGMs during AF were mapped/analyzed using an automated CFE algorithm . The algorithm measures the time between discrete deflections in a local EGM over 5 seconds ( based on selectable width and peak-to-peak [ > 0.03 mV ] criteria ) . The mean CL of the local EGM is projected onto the LA shell as a color-coded display . Regions of CL < 120 ms ( published criteria ) were targeted for ablation/elimination . Atrial fibrillation cycle length ( AFCL ) and regularity were measured from the CS . After CFE ablation , further ablation was done to achieve complete PVAI . RESULTS AF was spontaneous ( n = 20 ) or induced ( n = 15 ) in all patients . CFEs were most commonly found along the septum ( 97 % ) , anterior LA ( 97 % ) , PV antra ( 83 % ) , base of appendage ( 83 % ) , and annulus ( 71 % ) . CFE ablation alone prolonged the AFCL ( 171 + /- 27 vs. 304 + /- 41 ms ; P = .03 ) and regularized AF to left/right flutter ( AFL ) in 74 % of patients . CFE ablation terminated AF/AFL in 19 patients (54%)-the other 16 were cardioverted- and AF became noninducible in 77 % . CFE ablation alone did not cause PV isolation ( 0.1 + /- 0.3 PV isolated/patient ) . After combined CFE and PVAI ablation , the single-procedure , off-drug success rate was 83 % ( follow-up 13 + /- 4 months ) versus 71 % in matched controls who had PVAI alone ( P = .045 ) . CONCLUSIONS CFE ablation guided by an automated algorithm result ed in AFCL prolongation , regularization , and noninducibility in most patients . AF terminated in 54 % of cases . PVAI with adjuvant CFE ablation has a high efficacy and may be superior to PVAI alone
There is limited evidence to suggest which ablation method was the best .
There is limited evidence to suggest that CA may be a better treatment option compared to medical therapies in the management of persistent AF .
This review was also unable to recommend the best CA method
BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia seen in cardiovascular departments .
Treatments include medical interventions and catheter ablation .
Due to uncertainties in medical therapies for AF , and the need to continue sinus rhythm , ablation has been recently considered as a viable alternative .
Many new ablation methods based on pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) have been developed .
OBJECTIVES The primary objective of this review was to assess the beneficial and harmful effects of  catheter ablation ( CA ) in comparison with medical treatment in patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF .
The secondary objective was to determine the best regimen of CA .