Discussion Conservative treatment of acute calculous cholecystitis during index admission seems feasible and safe , especially in patients with mild disease .
Background In medical practice , the tendency to remove an inflamed gallbladder is deeply rooted .
Cholecystectomy , however , is associated with relatively high complication rates , and therefore the decision whether or not to perform surgery should be well considered .
For some patients , the surgical risk – benefit profile may favour conservative treatment .
The objective of this study was to examine the short- and long-term outcome of conservative treatment of patients with acute calculous cholecystitis .
Percutaneous Drainage versus Emergency Cholecystectomy for the Treatment of Acute Cholecystitis in Critically Ill Patients: Does it Matter?
Background The aim if this study was to compare percutaneous drainage ( PD ) of the gallbladder to emergency cholecystectomy ( EC ) in a well-defined patient group with sepsis related to acute calculous/acalculous cholecystitis ( ACC/AAC ) . Methods Between 2001 and 2007 , all consecutive patients of our ICU treated by either PD or EC were retrospectively analyzed . Cases were collected from a prospect i ve data base . Percutaneous drainage was performed by a transhepatic route and EC by open or laparoscopic approach . Patients ’ general condition and organ dysfunction were assessed by two vali date d scoring systems ( SAPS II and SOFA , respectively ) . Morbidity , mortality , and long-term outcome were systematic ally review ed and analyzed in both groups . Results Forty-two patients [ median age = 65.5 years ( range = 32–94 ) ] were included ; 45 % underwent EC  ( ten laparoscopic , nine open ) and 55 % PD ( n = 23 ) . Both patient groups had similar preoperative characteristics .  Percutaneous drainage and EC  were successful in 91 and 100 % of patients , respectively . Organ dysfunctions were similarly improved by the third postoperative/postdrainage days . Despite undergoing PD , two patients required EC due to gangrenous cholecystitis . The conversion rate after laparoscopy was 20 % . Overall morbidity was 8.7 % after PD and 47 % after EC ( P = 0.011 ) . Major morbidity was 0 % after PD and 21 % after EC ( P = 0.034 ) . The mortality rate was not different ( 13 % after PD and 16 % after EC , P = 1.0 ) and the deaths were all related to the patients ’ preexisting disease . Hospital and ICU stays were not different . Recurrent symptoms ( 17 % ) occurred only after ACC in the PD group . Conclusions In high-risk patients , PD and EC are both efficient in the resolution of acute cholecystitis sepsis . However , EC is associated with a higher procedure-related morbidity and the laparoscopic approach is not always possible . Percutaneous drainage represents a valuable intervention , but secondary cholecystectomy is m and atory in cases of acute calculous cholecystitis
Discussion Conservative treatment of acute calculous cholecystitis during index admission seems feasible and safe , especially in patients with mild disease .
Background In medical practice , the tendency to remove an inflamed gallbladder is deeply rooted .
Cholecystectomy , however , is associated with relatively high complication rates , and therefore the decision whether or not to perform surgery should be well considered .
For some patients , the surgical risk – benefit profile may favour conservative treatment .
The objective of this study was to examine the short- and long-term outcome of conservative treatment of patients with acute calculous cholecystitis .