We found low- quality evidence that different work-break frequencies may have no effect on participant-reported musculoskeletal pain , discomfort and fatigue .
For productivity and work performance , evidence was of very low- quality that different work-break frequencies may have a positive effect .
For different types of break , there may be no effect on participant-reported musculoskeletal pain , discomfort and fatigue according to low- quality evidence .
Furthermore , work-break interventions should be reconsidered , taking into account worker population s other than office workers , and taking into account the possibility of combining work-break intervention with other interventions such as ergonomic training or counselling , which may may possibly have an effect on musculoskeletal outcomes and work performance
BACKGROUND Work-related musculoskeletal disorders are a group of musculoskeletal disorders that comprise one of the most common disorders related to occupational sick leave worldwide .
Musculoskeletal disorders accounted for 21 % to 28 % of work absenteeism days in 2017/2018 in the Netherl and s , Germany and the UK .
There are several interventions that may be effective in tackling the high prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders among workers , such as physical , cognitive and organisational interventions .
In this review , we will focus on work breaks as a measure of primary prevention , which are a type of organisational intervention .
OBJECTIVES To compare the effectiveness of different work-break schedules for preventing work-related musculoskeletal symptoms and disorders in healthy workers , when compared to conventional or alternate work-break schedules .
A pilot randomised control trial of the effectiveness of a biofeedback mouse in reducing self-reported pain among office workers
A pilot study examined the effectiveness of a biofeedback mouse in reducing  upper extremity pain and discomfort in office workers ; in addition , relative mouse use ( RMU ) , satisfaction and the feasibility of running a r and omised controlled trial ( RCT ) in a workplace setting were evaluated . The mouse would gently vibrate if the h and was idle for more than 12 s. The feedback reminded users to rest the arm in neutral , supported postures . Analysis showed a statistically significant reduction in shoulder pain and discomfort for the intervention group at T2 ( 38.7 % lower than controls ) . Statistically significant differences in RMU time between groups were seen post intervention ( −7 % at T1 and + 15 % at T2 for the intervention group ) . Fifty-five percent of the intervention group was willing to continue using the mouse . It appears feasible to perform an RCT for this type of intervention in a workplace setting . Further study including more participants is suggested . Practitioner Summary : The study findings support the feasibility of conducting r and omised control trials in office setting s to evaluate ergonomics interventions . The intervention result ed in reduced pain and discomfort in the shoulder . The intervention could be a relevant tool in the reduction of upper extremity musculoskeletal disorder . Further research will better explain the study 's preliminary findings
We found low- quality evidence that different work-break frequencies may have no effect on participant-reported musculoskeletal pain , discomfort and fatigue .
For productivity and work performance , evidence was of very low- quality that different work-break frequencies may have a positive effect .
For different types of break , there may be no effect on participant-reported musculoskeletal pain , discomfort and fatigue according to low- quality evidence .
Furthermore , work-break interventions should be reconsidered , taking into account worker population s other than office workers , and taking into account the possibility of combining work-break intervention with other interventions such as ergonomic training or counselling , which may may possibly have an effect on musculoskeletal outcomes and work performance
BACKGROUND Work-related musculoskeletal disorders are a group of musculoskeletal disorders that comprise one of the most common disorders related to occupational sick leave worldwide .
Musculoskeletal disorders accounted for 21 % to 28 % of work absenteeism days in 2017/2018 in the Netherl and s , Germany and the UK .
There are several interventions that may be effective in tackling the high prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders among workers , such as physical , cognitive and organisational interventions .
In this review , we will focus on work breaks as a measure of primary prevention , which are a type of organisational intervention .
OBJECTIVES To compare the effectiveness of different work-break schedules for preventing work-related musculoskeletal symptoms and disorders in healthy workers , when compared to conventional or alternate work-break schedules .