Conclusions ART single-surface restorations  presented high survival percentages in both primary and permanent posterior teeth , whilst ART multiple-surface restorations presented lower survival percentages .
ART sealants presented a high-caries-preventive effect .
Clinical relevance ART is an effective evidence -based option for treating and preventing carious lesions in primary and permanent posterior teeth
Objective The aim of the present study is to up date the results of two previous meta-analyses , published in 2006 and 2012 , on the survival percentages of  atraumatic restorative treatment ( ART ) restorations and ART sealants .
The current meta- analysis includes Chinese publications not investigated before .
Clinical evaluation of the ART technique using high density and resin-modified glass lonomer cements.
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of two different glass ionomer cements using the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment ( ART ) technique in permanent teeth . MATERIAL S AND METHODS A total of 473 ART restorations were placed in 208 schoolchildren ( 7 - 12 years of age ) by two previously trained operators , using high density and resin-modified glass ionomer cements . All the restorations were photographed at baseline and the patients were asked about postoperative sensitivity . After a period of 8 months , 193 patients were present after recall and 428 restorations were evaluated and photographed . Two independent examiners carried out the evaluation . RESULTS The results showed a success rate of 86.2 % for occlusal restorations with Fuji IX and 88.4 % for those restored with Fuji Plus . A total of 86.7 % of the approximal restorations with Fuji Plus were also judged to be successful after 8 months . No association was found between the material s and the clinical performance of the ART restorations in class I cavities . CONCLUSION The type of restorative material did not influence the success or failure rates in class I cavities within this period . Fuji IX showed promising performance for occlusal ART restorations and Fuji Plus is also a promising material for occlusal and approximal ART restorations
Conclusions ART single-surface restorations  presented high survival percentages in both primary and permanent posterior teeth , whilst ART multiple-surface restorations presented lower survival percentages .
ART sealants presented a high-caries-preventive effect .
Clinical relevance ART is an effective evidence -based option for treating and preventing carious lesions in primary and permanent posterior teeth
Objective The aim of the present study is to up date the results of two previous meta-analyses , published in 2006 and 2012 , on the survival percentages of  atraumatic restorative treatment ( ART ) restorations and ART sealants .
The current meta- analysis includes Chinese publications not investigated before .