Conclusions There is no evidence to support differences in the effects of long-acting GH compared with those of daily GH .
Purpose Long-acting growth hormone ( GH ) has been developed to address the noncompliance and decreased efficacy associated with daily GH injections .
We aim ed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of long-acting GH replacement therapy in children with short stature .
A Randomized Phase 2 Study of Long-Acting TransCon GH vs Daily GH in Childhood GH Deficiency
Context TransCon Growth Hormone ( GH ) ( Ascendis Pharma ) is a long-acting recombinant sustained-release human GH prodrug in development for children with GH deficiency ( GHD ) . Objective To compare the pharmacokinetics , pharmacodynamics , safety , and efficacy of weekly TransCon GH to that of daily GH in prepubertal children with GHD . Design R and omized , open-label , active-controlled study of three doses of weekly TransCon GH versus daily Genotropin ( Pfizer ) . Setting Thirty-eight centers in 14 European countries and Egypt . Patients Prepubertal male and female treatment-naïve children with GHD ( n = 53 ) . Interventions Subjects received one of three TransCon GH doses ( 0.14 , 0.21 , or 0.30 mg GH/kg/wk ) or Genotropin 0.03 mg GH/kg/d for 26 weeks . Main Outcome Measures GH and insulinlike growth factor-1 ( IGF-1 ) levels , growth , adverse events , and immunogenicity . Results Both GH maximum concentration and area under the curve were similar following TransCon GH or Genotropin administration at comparable doses . A dose response was observed , with IGF-1 st and ard deviation scores increasing into the normal range for all three TransCon GH doses . Annualized mean height velocity for the three TransCon GH doses ranged from 11.9 cm to 13.9 cm , which was not statistically different from 11.6 cm for Genotropin . Adverse events were mild to moderate , and most were unrelated to the study drug . Injection site tolerance was good . One TransCon GH subject developed a low-titer , nonneutralizing antibody response to GH . Conclusions The results suggest that long-acting TransCon GH is comparable to daily Genotropin for GH ( pharmacokinetics ) and IGF-1 ( pharmacodynamics ) levels , safety , and efficacy and support advancement into phase 3 development
Conclusions There is no evidence to support differences in the effects of long-acting GH compared with those of daily GH .
Purpose Long-acting growth hormone ( GH ) has been developed to address the noncompliance and decreased efficacy associated with daily GH injections .
We aim ed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of long-acting GH replacement therapy in children with short stature .