The HBET group did not show improvement in MWD/T compared with the WA group ( SMD 0.30 , 95 % CI -0.45 to 1.05 ; P = 0.43 ; moderate- quality evidence ) .Compared with HBET , SET was more beneficial for PFWD/T but had no effect on quality of life parameters nor on self-reported functional impairment .
Compared with WA , SET was more beneficial for PFWD/T and self-reported functional impairment , as well as for some quality of life parameters ( e.g. , physical functioning , pain , and physical component summary after 12 months ) , and HBET had no effect .
Data show no obvious effects on mortality rates .
Evidence of moderate and high quality shows that SET provides an important benefit for treadmill-measured walking distance ( MWD and PFWD ) compared with HBET and WA , respectively .
Although its clinical relevance has not been definitively demonstrated , this benefit translates to increased MWD of 120 and 210 meters after three months in SET groups .
These increased walking distances are likely to have a positive impact on the lives of patients with IC .
Data provide no clear evidence of a difference between HBET and WA .
Trials show no clear differences in quality of life parameters nor in self-reported functional impairment between SET and HBET .
BACKGROUND Although supervised exercise therapy ( SET ) provides significant symptomatic benefit for patients with intermittent claudication ( IC ) , it remains an underutilized tool .
Widespread implementation of SET is restricted by lack of facilities and funding .
Structured home-based exercise therapy ( HBET ) with an observation component ( e.g. , exercise logbooks , pedometers ) and just walking advice ( WA ) are alternatives to SET .
This is the second up date of a review first published in 2006 .
OBJECTIVES The primary objective was to provide an accurate overview of studies evaluating effects of SET programs , HBET programs , and WA on maximal treadmill walking distance or time ( MWD/T ) for patients with IC .
Secondary objectives were to evaluate effects of SET , HBET , and WA on pain-free treadmill walking distance or time ( PFWD/T ) , quality of life , and self-reported functional impairment .
Multicenter randomized clinical trial of supervised exercise therapy with or without feedback versus walking advice for intermittent claudication.
OBJECTIVE The initial treatment for intermittent claudication is supervised exercise therapy ( SET ) . Owing to limited capacity and patient transports costs of clinic-based SET , a concept of SET provided by local physiotherapists was developed . We hypothesized that provision of daily feedback with an accelerometer in addition to SET would further increase walking distance . METHODS This multicenter r and omized trial was set in vascular surgery outpatient clinics and included 304 patients with intermittent claudication . Patients were r and omized to exercise therapy in the form of " go home and walk " advice ( WA ) , SET , or SET with feedback . Local physiotherapists provided SET . The primary outcome measure was the change in absolute claudication distance . Secondary outcomes were the change in functional claudication distance and results on the Walking Impairment Question naire ( WIQ ) and Short-Form 36 ( SF-36 ) Health Survey after 12 months . RESULTS In 11 centers , 102 , 109 , and 93 patients were included , respectively , in the WA , SET , and SET with feedback groups , and data for 83 , 93 , and 76 , respectively , could be analyzed . The median ( interquartile range ) change in walking distance between 12 months and baseline in meters was 110 ( 0 - 300 ) in the WA group , 310 ( 145 - 995 ) in the SET group , and 360 ( 173 - 697 ) in the SET with feedback group ( P < .001 WA vs SET ) . WIQ scores and relevant domains of the SF-36 improved statistically significantly in the SET groups . CONCLUSIONS SET is more effective than WA in improving walking distance , WIQ scores , and quality of life for patients with intermittent claudication . Additional feedback with an accelerometer did not result in further improvement . SET programs should be made available for all patients with intermittent claudication
The HBET group did not show improvement in MWD/T compared with the WA group ( SMD 0.30 , 95 % CI -0.45 to 1.05 ; P = 0.43 ; moderate- quality evidence ) .Compared with HBET , SET was more beneficial for PFWD/T but had no effect on quality of life parameters nor on self-reported functional impairment .
Compared with WA , SET was more beneficial for PFWD/T and self-reported functional impairment , as well as for some quality of life parameters ( e.g. , physical functioning , pain , and physical component summary after 12 months ) , and HBET had no effect .
Data show no obvious effects on mortality rates .
Evidence of moderate and high quality shows that SET provides an important benefit for treadmill-measured walking distance ( MWD and PFWD ) compared with HBET and WA , respectively .
Although its clinical relevance has not been definitively demonstrated , this benefit translates to increased MWD of 120 and 210 meters after three months in SET groups .
These increased walking distances are likely to have a positive impact on the lives of patients with IC .
Data provide no clear evidence of a difference between HBET and WA .
Trials show no clear differences in quality of life parameters nor in self-reported functional impairment between SET and HBET .
BACKGROUND Although supervised exercise therapy ( SET ) provides significant symptomatic benefit for patients with intermittent claudication ( IC ) , it remains an underutilized tool .
Widespread implementation of SET is restricted by lack of facilities and funding .
Structured home-based exercise therapy ( HBET ) with an observation component ( e.g. , exercise logbooks , pedometers ) and just walking advice ( WA ) are alternatives to SET .
This is the second up date of a review first published in 2006 .
OBJECTIVES The primary objective was to provide an accurate overview of studies evaluating effects of SET programs , HBET programs , and WA on maximal treadmill walking distance or time ( MWD/T ) for patients with IC .
Secondary objectives were to evaluate effects of SET , HBET , and WA on pain-free treadmill walking distance or time ( PFWD/T ) , quality of life , and self-reported functional impairment .