Naftopidil appears to have similar effects in the urological symptom scores and QoL compared to tamsulosin and silodosin .
Naftopidil has similar sexual adverse events compared to tamsulosin but has fewer compared to silodosin
BACKGROUND Benign prostatic hyperplasia ( BPH ) is a common condition in ageing men that may cause lower urinary tract symptoms ( LUTS ) .
Treatment aims are to relieve symptoms and prevent disease-related complications .
Naftopidil is an alpha-blocker ( AB ) that has a high affinity for the A1d receptor that may have advantages in treating LUTS in this setting .
This is an up date of a Cochrane Review first published in 2009 .
Since that time , several large r and omised controlled trials ( RCTs ) have been reported , making this up date relevant .
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effects of naftopidil for the treatment of LUTS associated with BPH .
What Is the Most Bothersome Lower Urinary Tract Symptom? Individual- and Population-level Perspectives for Both Men and Women
Background No study has compared the bothersomeness of all lower urinary tract symptoms ( LUTS ) using a population -based sample of adults . Despite this lack of evidence , investigators have often cited their LUTS of interest as the “ most bothersome ” or “ one of the most bothersome . ” Objective To compare the population - and individual-level burden of LUTS in men and women . Design , setting , and participants In this population -based cross-sectional study , question naires were mailed to 6000 individuals ( 18–79 yr of age ) r and omly identified from the Finnish Population Register . Outcome measurements and statistical analysis The vali date d Danish Prostatic Symptom Score question naire was used for assessment of bother of 12 different LUTS . The age-st and ardized prevalence of at least moderate bother was calculated for each symptom ( population -level burden ) . Among symptomatic individuals , the proportion of affected individuals with at least moderate bother was calculated for each symptom ( individual-level bother ) . Results and limitations A total of 3727 individuals ( 62.4 % ) participated ( 53.7 % female ) . The LUTS with the greatest population -level burden were urgency ( 7.9 % with at least moderate bother ) , stress urinary incontinence ( SUI ) ( 6.5 % ) , nocturia ( 6.0 % ) , postmicturition dribble ( 5.8 % ) , and urgency urinary incontinence ( UUI ) ( 5.0 % ) . Burden from incontinence symptoms was higher in women than men , and the opposite was true for voiding and postmicturition symptoms . At the individual level , UUI was the most bothersome for both genders . Although the response proportion was high , approximately a third did not participate . Conclusions Both men and women with UUI report moderate or major bother more frequently than individuals with other LUTS . At the population level , the most prevalent bothersome symptoms are urgency , SUI , and nocturia . Patient summary Urinary urgency was the most common troubling symptom in a large population -based study ; however , for individuals , urgency incontinence was the most likely to be rated as bothersome
Naftopidil appears to have similar effects in the urological symptom scores and QoL compared to tamsulosin and silodosin .
Naftopidil has similar sexual adverse events compared to tamsulosin but has fewer compared to silodosin
BACKGROUND Benign prostatic hyperplasia ( BPH ) is a common condition in ageing men that may cause lower urinary tract symptoms ( LUTS ) .
Treatment aims are to relieve symptoms and prevent disease-related complications .
Naftopidil is an alpha-blocker ( AB ) that has a high affinity for the A1d receptor that may have advantages in treating LUTS in this setting .
This is an up date of a Cochrane Review first published in 2009 .
Since that time , several large r and omised controlled trials ( RCTs ) have been reported , making this up date relevant .
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effects of naftopidil for the treatment of LUTS associated with BPH .