Meta-analyses showed no clinical ly relevant differences in terms of revision rates , clinical outcome scores or patient-reported outcome measures between MB and FB TKRs .
It appears that theoretical assumptions of superiority of MB over FB TKR are not borne out in clinical practice
Mobile-bearing ( MB ) total knee replacement ( TKR ) was introduced to reduce the risk of aseptic loosening and wear of polyethylene inserts .
However , no consistent clinical advantages of mobile- over fixed-bearing ( FB ) TKR have been found .
In this study we evaluated whether mobile bearings have an advantage over fixed bearings with regard to revision rates and clinical outcome scores .
Furthermore , we determined which modifying variables affected the outcome .
Comparison of mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study.
The purpose of this prospect i ve r and omized study was to compare the postoperative recovery and early results of 2 groups of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty : 107 patients received an established fixed-bearing posterior-stabilized prosthesis ( Legacy Posterior Stabilized [ LPS ] ) , and 103 patients the meniscal-bearing prosthesis ( Meniscal Bearing Knee [ MBK ] ) .  Surgical procedures were the same for both groups except for posterior cruciate ligament management , which was sacrificed in the LPS group and spared but completely released from the tibia in the MBK group . At an average follow-up of 36 months , knee , function , and patellar scores were comparable in both groups . The LPS group showed a significantly higher maximum flexion than the MBK group ( 112 degrees vs 108 degrees ) . Using a fixed-bearing or a mobile-bearing design did not seem to influence the short-term recovery and early results after knee arthroplasty . Key words : total knee arthroplasty , mobile bearing , knee prosthesis , meniscal-bearing knee , posterior stabilized , prospect i ve r and omized
Meta-analyses showed no clinical ly relevant differences in terms of revision rates , clinical outcome scores or patient-reported outcome measures between MB and FB TKRs .
It appears that theoretical assumptions of superiority of MB over FB TKR are not borne out in clinical practice
Mobile-bearing ( MB ) total knee replacement ( TKR ) was introduced to reduce the risk of aseptic loosening and wear of polyethylene inserts .
However , no consistent clinical advantages of mobile- over fixed-bearing ( FB ) TKR have been found .
In this study we evaluated whether mobile bearings have an advantage over fixed bearings with regard to revision rates and clinical outcome scores .
Furthermore , we determined which modifying variables affected the outcome .