The study showed that the computerized decision aid appears to increase the proportion of patients who responded to invitations to discuss CVD prevention with their doctor .
We tentatively conclude that CAHTS can provide individually-tailored information about CVD prevention .
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES CVD is an important global healthcare issue ; it is the leading cause of global mortality , with an increasing incidence identified in both developed and developing countries .
It is also an extremely costly disease for healthcare systems unless managed effectively .
In this review we aim ed to : - Assess the effect of computer-assisted versus oral- and -written history taking on the quality of collected information for the prevention and management of CVD . -
Assess the effect of computer-assisted versus oral- and -written history taking on the prevention and management of CVD .
The impact of a decision aid about heart disease prevention on patients' discussions with their doctor and their plans for prevention: a pilot randomized trial
Abstract Background Low utilization of effective coronary heart disease ( CHD ) prevention strategies may be due to many factors , but chief among them is the lack of patient involvement in prevention decisions . We undertook this study to test the effectiveness of an individually-tailored , computerized decision aid about CHD on patients ' discussion s with their doctor and their plans for CHD prevention . Methods We conducted a pilot r and omized trial in a convenience sample of adults with no previous history of cardiovascular disease to test the effectiveness of an individually-tailored , computerized decision aid about CHD prevention against a risk factor list that patients could present to their doctor . Results We enrolled 75 adults . Mean age was 53 . 59 % were female , 73 % white , and 23 % African-American . 66 % had some college education . 43 % had a 10-year CHD risk of 0–5 % , 25 % a risk of 6–10 % , 24 % a risk of 11–20 % , and 5 % a risk of > 20 % . 78 % had at least one option to reduce their CHD risk , but only 45 % accurately identified the strategies best supported by evidence . 41 patients received the decision aid  , 34 received  usual care . In unadjusted analysis , the decision aid increased the proportion of patients who discussed CHD risk reduction with their doctor from 24 % to 40 % ( absolute difference 16 % ; 95 % CI -4 % to + 37 % ) and increased the proportion who had a specific plan to reduce their risk from 24 % to 37 % ( absolute difference 13 % ; 95 % CI -7 % to + 34 % ) . In pre-post testing , the decision aid also appeared to increase the proportion of patients with plans to intervene on their CHD risk ( absolute increase ranging from 21 % to 47 % for planned medication use and 5 % to 16 % for planned behavioral interventions ) . Conclusion Our study confirms patients ' limited knowledge about their CHD risk and effective risk reduction options and provides preliminary evidence that an individually-tailored decision aid about CHD prevention might be expected to increase patients ' discussion s about CHD prevention with their doctor and their plans for CHD risk reduction . These findings should be replicated in studies with a larger sample size and patients at overall higher risk of CHD . Trial Registration : Clinical Trials.gov
The study showed that the computerized decision aid appears to increase the proportion of patients who responded to invitations to discuss CVD prevention with their doctor .
We tentatively conclude that CAHTS can provide individually-tailored information about CVD prevention .
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES CVD is an important global healthcare issue ; it is the leading cause of global mortality , with an increasing incidence identified in both developed and developing countries .
It is also an extremely costly disease for healthcare systems unless managed effectively .
In this review we aim ed to : - Assess the effect of computer-assisted versus oral- and -written history taking on the quality of collected information for the prevention and management of CVD . -
Assess the effect of computer-assisted versus oral- and -written history taking on the prevention and management of CVD .