LHRH antagonists decrease testosterone without any testosterone surge , and they may be associated with an oncologic benefit compared with LHRH analogues .
Complete and rogen blockade has a small survival benefit of about 5 % .
Intermittent and rogen deprivation results in noninferior oncologic efficacy when compared with continuous and rogen-deprivation therapy ( ADT ) in well-selected population s. In locally advanced and metastatic PCa , early ADT does not result in a significant survival advantage when compared with delayed ADT .
LHRH antagonists decrease testosterone without any testosterone surge , and they might be associated with an oncologic benefit compared with LHRH analogues .
Complete and rogen blockade has a small survival benefit of about 5 % .
Intermittent and rogen deprivation results in noninferior oncologic efficacy when compared with continuous and rogen-deprivation therapy ( ADT ) in well-selected population s. In locally advanced and metastatic PCa , early ADT does not result in a significant survival advantage when compared with delayed ADT .
OBJECTIVE To present a summary of the 2013 version of the European Association of Urology ( EAU ) guidelines on the treatment of advanced , relapsing , and castration-resistant prostate cancer ( CRPC ) .
The guidelines were up date d , and levels of evidence and /or grade s of recommendation were added to the text based on a systematic review of the literature that included a search of online data bases and bibliographic review s. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Luteinising hormone-releasing hormone ( LHRH ) agonists are the st and ard of care in metastatic prostate cancer ( PCa ) .
Treatment of CRPC includes sipuleucel-T , abiraterone acetate plus prednisone ( AA/P ) , or chemotherapy with docetaxel at 75mg/m(2 ) every 3 wk .
Cabazitaxel , AA/P , enzalutamide , and radium-223 are available for second-line treatment of CRPC following docetaxel .
CONCLUSIONS The knowledge in the field of advanced , metastatic , and castration-resistant PCa is rapidly changing .
PATIENT SUMMARY We present a summary of the 2013 version of the European Association of Urology guidelines on treatment of advanced , relapsing , and castration-resistant prostate cancer ( CRPC ) .
Luteinising hormone-releasing hormone ( LHRH ) agonists are the st and ard of care in metastatic prostate cancer ( PCa ) .
Relapse after local therapy is defined by prostate-specific antigen ( PSA ) values > 0.2 ng/ml following radical prostatectomy ( RP ) and > 2 ng/ml above the nadir and after radiation therapy .
Therapy for PSA relapse after RP includes salvage radiation therapy at PSA levels < 0.5 ng/ml and salvage RP or cryosurgical ablation of the prostate in radiation failures .
Docetaxel and estramustine compared with mitoxantrone and prednisone for advanced refractory prostate cancer.
BACKGROUND Mitoxantrone-based chemotherapy palliates pain without extending survival in men with progressive and rogen-independent prostate cancer . We compared docetaxel plus estramustine with mitoxantrone plus prednisone in men with metastatic , hormone-independent prostate cancer . METHODS We r and omly assigned 770 men to one of two treatments , each given in 21-day cycles : 280 mg of estramustine three times daily on days 1 through 5 , 60 mg of docetaxel per square meter of body-surface area on day 2 , and 60 mg of dexamethasone in three divided doses before docetaxel , or 12 mg of mitoxantrone per square meter on day 1 plus 5 mg of prednisone twice daily . The primary end point was overall survival ; secondary end points were progression-free survival , objective response rates , and post-treatment declines of at least 50 percent in serum prostate-specific antigen ( PSA ) levels . RESULTS Of 674 eligible patients , 338 were assigned to receive docetaxel and estramustine and 336 to receive mitoxantrone and prednisone . In an intention-to-treat analysis , the median overall survival was longer in the group given docetaxel and estramustine than in the group given mitoxantrone and prednisone ( 17.5 months vs. 15.6 months , P=0.02 by the log-rank test ) , and the corresponding hazard ratio for death was 0.80 ( 95 percent confidence interval , 0.67 to 0.97 ) . The median time to progression was 6.3 months in the group given docetaxel and estramustine and 3.2 months in the group given mitoxantrone and prednisone ( P<0.001 by the log-rank test ) . PSA declines of at least 50 percent occurred in 50 percent and 27 percent of patients , respectively ( P<0.001 ) , and objective tumor responses were observed in 17 percent and 11 percent of patients with bidimensionally measurable disease , respectively ( P=0.30 ) . Grade 3 or 4 neutropenic fevers ( P=0.01 ) , nausea and vomiting ( P<0.001 ) , and cardiovascular events ( P=0.001 ) were more common among patients receiving docetaxel and estramustine than among those receiving mitoxantrone and prednisone .  Pain relief was similar in both groups . CONCLUSIONS The improvement in median survival of nearly two months with docetaxel and estramustine , as compared with mitoxantrone and prednisone , provides support for this approach in men with metastatic , and rogen-independent prostate cancer
LHRH antagonists decrease testosterone without any testosterone surge , and they may be associated with an oncologic benefit compared with LHRH analogues .
Complete and rogen blockade has a small survival benefit of about 5 % .
Intermittent and rogen deprivation results in noninferior oncologic efficacy when compared with continuous and rogen-deprivation therapy ( ADT ) in well-selected population s. In locally advanced and metastatic PCa , early ADT does not result in a significant survival advantage when compared with delayed ADT .
LHRH antagonists decrease testosterone without any testosterone surge , and they might be associated with an oncologic benefit compared with LHRH analogues .
Complete and rogen blockade has a small survival benefit of about 5 % .
Intermittent and rogen deprivation results in noninferior oncologic efficacy when compared with continuous and rogen-deprivation therapy ( ADT ) in well-selected population s. In locally advanced and metastatic PCa , early ADT does not result in a significant survival advantage when compared with delayed ADT .
OBJECTIVE To present a summary of the 2013 version of the European Association of Urology ( EAU ) guidelines on the treatment of advanced , relapsing , and castration-resistant prostate cancer ( CRPC ) .
The guidelines were up date d , and levels of evidence and /or grade s of recommendation were added to the text based on a systematic review of the literature that included a search of online data bases and bibliographic review s. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Luteinising hormone-releasing hormone ( LHRH ) agonists are the st and ard of care in metastatic prostate cancer ( PCa ) .
Treatment of CRPC includes sipuleucel-T , abiraterone acetate plus prednisone ( AA/P ) , or chemotherapy with docetaxel at 75mg/m(2 ) every 3 wk .
Cabazitaxel , AA/P , enzalutamide , and radium-223 are available for second-line treatment of CRPC following docetaxel .
CONCLUSIONS The knowledge in the field of advanced , metastatic , and castration-resistant PCa is rapidly changing .
PATIENT SUMMARY We present a summary of the 2013 version of the European Association of Urology guidelines on treatment of advanced , relapsing , and castration-resistant prostate cancer ( CRPC ) .
Luteinising hormone-releasing hormone ( LHRH ) agonists are the st and ard of care in metastatic prostate cancer ( PCa ) .
Relapse after local therapy is defined by prostate-specific antigen ( PSA ) values > 0.2 ng/ml following radical prostatectomy ( RP ) and > 2 ng/ml above the nadir and after radiation therapy .
Therapy for PSA relapse after RP includes salvage radiation therapy at PSA levels < 0.5 ng/ml and salvage RP or cryosurgical ablation of the prostate in radiation failures .