Some statistically significant differences between citalopram and other antidepressants for the acute phase treatment of major depression were found in terms of efficacy , tolerability and acceptability .
Citalopram was more efficacious than paroxetine and reboxetine and more acceptable than tricyclics , reboxetine and venlafaxine , however , it seemed to be less efficacious than escitalopram .
BACKGROUND Recent US and UK clinical practice guidelines recommend that second-generation antidepressants should be considered amongst the best first-line options when drug therapy is indicated for a depressive episode .
Systematic review s have already highlighted some differences in efficacy between second-generation antidepressants .
Citalopram , one of the first selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors ( SSRI ) introduced in the market , is one of these antidepressant drugs that clinicians use for routine depression care .
OBJECTIVES To assess the evidence for the efficacy , acceptability and tolerability of citalopram in comparison with tricyclics , heterocyclics , other SSRIs and other conventional and non-conventional antidepressants in the acute-phase treatment of major depression .
Efficacy and tolerability of venlafaxine in geriatric outpatients with major depression: a double-blind, randomised 6-month comparative trial with citalopram.
BACKGROUND The objectives of the study were to compare efficacy and tolerability of venlafaxine ER 75 - 150 mg/day with that of citalopram 10 - 20 mg/day in elderly patients with major depression according to DSM-IV criteria . METHODS A r and omised , double-blind , parallel group 6-month study . Efficacy was assessed by MADRS , CGI Global Improvement , CGI Severity of Illness and GDS-20 scores and safety by physical examinations , vital signs , adverse events and UKU side effect rating . Plasma levels of venlafaxine , its major metabolite O-desmethylvenlafaxine and citalopram were followed . RESULTS One hundred and fifty-one male and female patients ( 64 - 89 years ) were enrolled and 118 patients completed the study . Comparable improvements in MADRS , CGI Severity of Illness , CGI Global Improvement and GDS-20 were observed during venlafaxine and citalopram treatment . The MADRS remission rate was 19 % for venlafaxine and 23 % for citalopram .  Side effects were common during both treatments but differed in tremor being more common during citalopram and nausea/vomiting during venlafaxine treatment . There were no clinical ly significant changes in blood pressure or body weight . CONCLUSION The observed benefits of venlafaxine treatment in elderly patients with major depression were similar to those observed in younger adults as were reported adverse events and side effects . Treatment with venlafaxine ER was well tolerated and induced beneficial effects of similar magnitude as those of citalopram
Some statistically significant differences between citalopram and other antidepressants for the acute phase treatment of major depression were found in terms of efficacy , tolerability and acceptability .
Citalopram was more efficacious than paroxetine and reboxetine and more acceptable than tricyclics , reboxetine and venlafaxine , however , it seemed to be less efficacious than escitalopram .
BACKGROUND Recent US and UK clinical practice guidelines recommend that second-generation antidepressants should be considered amongst the best first-line options when drug therapy is indicated for a depressive episode .
Systematic review s have already highlighted some differences in efficacy between second-generation antidepressants .
Citalopram , one of the first selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors ( SSRI ) introduced in the market , is one of these antidepressant drugs that clinicians use for routine depression care .
OBJECTIVES To assess the evidence for the efficacy , acceptability and tolerability of citalopram in comparison with tricyclics , heterocyclics , other SSRIs and other conventional and non-conventional antidepressants in the acute-phase treatment of major depression .