Conclusions For most clinical tests in LBP there is not consistent evidence for an association with outcome .
Central ization and non-organic signs are exceptions from that .
Background There is a strong tradition of performing a clinical examination of low back pain ( LBP ) patients and this is generally recommended in guidelines .
However , establishing a pathoanatomic diagnosis does not seem possible in most LBP patients and clinical tests may potentially be more relevant as prognostic factors .
The aim of this review of the literature was to systematic ally assess the association between low-tech clinical tests commonly used in adult patients with acute , recurrent or chronic LBP and short- and long-term outcome .
Relationship between spinal stiffness and outcome in patients with chronic low back pain.
Many manual therapists assess and treat spinal stiffness of people with low back pain . The objectives of this study were to investigate : ( i ) whether spinal stiffness changes after treatment ; ( ii ) the relationship between pre-treatment spinal stiffness and change in stiffness with treatment ; ( iii ) the relationship between spinal stiffness , pain , disability and global perceived effect of treatment ; ( iv ) whether spinal stiffness predicts outcome of treatment or response to treatment in chronic low back pain patients . One hundred and ninety-one subjects with chronic low back pain were r and omly allocated to groups that received either spinal manipulative therapy , motor control exercise , or a general exercise program . Spinal stiffness  was assessed before and after intervention . All three groups showed a significant decrease in stiffness following treatment ( p<0.001 ) . No difference between groups was observed . There was a significant negative correlation between pre-treatment stiffness and change in stiffness ( r=-0.61 ; p<0.001 ) . There was a significant but weak correlation ( r=0.18 ; p=0.02 ) between change in stiffness and change in global perceived effect of treatment , and a significant but weak correlation between change in stiffness and change in function for subjects in the spinal manipulative therapy group ( r=-0.28 ; p=0.02 ) . No significant association was observed between initial stiffness score and any of the final outcome measures following treatment . Initial stiffness did not predict response to any treatment . In conclusion , spinal stiffness decreases over the course of an episode of treatment , more so in those with the stiffest spines , but the decrease is not dependent on treatment and is not generally related to outcome
Conclusions For most clinical tests in LBP there is not consistent evidence for an association with outcome .
Central ization and non-organic signs are exceptions from that .
Background There is a strong tradition of performing a clinical examination of low back pain ( LBP ) patients and this is generally recommended in guidelines .
However , establishing a pathoanatomic diagnosis does not seem possible in most LBP patients and clinical tests may potentially be more relevant as prognostic factors .
The aim of this review of the literature was to systematic ally assess the association between low-tech clinical tests commonly used in adult patients with acute , recurrent or chronic LBP and short- and long-term outcome .