Sensitivity analysis indicates that from both perspectives the service is very cost effective and may be cost saving .
CONCLUSIONS These results make alcohol screening and counseling one of the highest-ranking preventive services among the 25 effective services evaluated using st and ardized methods .
BACKGROUND The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force ( USPSTF ) has recommended screening and behavioral counseling interventions in primary care to reduce alcohol misuse .
This study was design ed to develop a st and ardized rating for the clinical ly preventable burden and cost effectiveness of complying with that recommendation that would allow comparisons across many recommended services .
Screening for problem drinking and counseling by the primary care physician-nurse team.
Present methods to screen for alcohol abuse are generally obtrusive and result in referral to services that deal mainly with alcoholics . These factors deter physicians from identifying alcohol abuse patients at an early stage . In the present study , 81 % of all primary care physicians of a single city evaluated ( i ) the efficiency and the acceptability of a nonobtrusive screening method for the identification of problem drinkers and ( ii ) the effectiveness of brief cognitive behavioral counseling given by a nurse in a lifestyle context . Patients ( n = 15,686 ) attending the private practice s of 42 primary -care physicians were asked four alcohol-neutral trauma questions in the reception area . Physicians asked about alcohol use and alcohol-related problems only to patients with previous trauma . Problem drinkers by defined criteria were offered an appointment with a nurse who , by r and om assignment , gave either 3-hr of cognitive behavioral counseling over 1 year or simply advised patients to reduce their alcohol intake . The screening method identified 62 - 85 % of expected number of problem drinkers in this population . Following the application of exclusion criteria , 105 problem drinkers were entered in the intervention part of the study . After 1 year , patients who received counseling showed significant reductions in reported alcohol consumption ( -70 % ; p < 0.001 ) , psychosocial problems ( -85 % ; p < 0.001 ) and serum gamma glutamyl transferase ( -32 % to -58 % ; p < 0.02 ) . Physician visits were reduced ( -34 % ; p < 0.02 ) following counseling . Patients receiving only advice showed neither reductions in psychosocial problems nor in serum gamma glutamyl transferase or physician visits , but reported a 46 % reduction ( p < 0.01 ) in alcohol consumption . Data indicate that asking patients about recent trauma is efficient and is well accepted as the first screening instrument in the identification of the problem drinker . Cost of screening per patient is under one dollar . Counseling of 3 hr given by a nurse is markedly superior ( p < 0.05 ) to simple advice in reducing alcohol consumption , objective indicators of alcohol-related morbidity , and the frequency of physician visits
Sensitivity analysis indicates that from both perspectives the service is very cost effective and may be cost saving .
CONCLUSIONS These results make alcohol screening and counseling one of the highest-ranking preventive services among the 25 effective services evaluated using st and ardized methods .
BACKGROUND The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force ( USPSTF ) has recommended screening and behavioral counseling interventions in primary care to reduce alcohol misuse .
This study was design ed to develop a st and ardized rating for the clinical ly preventable burden and cost effectiveness of complying with that recommendation that would allow comparisons across many recommended services .