Several studies of good quality demonstrated changes in lifestyle habits arising from the provision of genetic interventions .
The most promising lifestyle changes were changes in nutrition .
Conclusions : It is possible to facilitate behaviour change using genetic testing as the catalyst .
Background : Study ing the impact of  genetic testing interventions on lifestyle behaviour change  has been a priority area of research in recent years .
Substantial heterogeneity exists in the results and conclusions of this literature , which has yet to be explained using vali date d behaviour change theory and an assessment of the quality of genetic interventions .
The theory of planned behaviour ( TPB ) helps to explain key contributors to behaviour change .
It has been hypothesized that personalization could be added to this theory to help predict changes in health behaviours .
Purpose : This systematic review provides a detailed , comprehensive identification , assessment , and summary of primary research articles pertaining to  lifestyle behaviour change  ( nutrition , physical activity , sleep , and smoking ) result ing from  genetic testing interventions .
The present review further aims to provide in-depth analyses of studies conducted to date within the context of the TPB and the quality of genetic interventions provided to participants while aim ing to determine whether or not genetic testing facilitates changes in lifestyle habits .
This review is timely in light of a recently published “ call-to-action ” paper , highlighting the need to incorporate the TPB into personalized healthcare behaviour change research .
An intervention study of smoking cessation with feedback on genetic cancer susceptibility in Japan.
BACKGROUND To evaluate whether feedback of genetic information regarding an L-myc polymorphism , identified as impacting on tobacco-related cancer risk , has an influence on smoking cessation , an intervention study was conducted . METHODS We recruited smokers from first-visit out patients at Aichi Cancer Center Hospital . Six hundred and seventeen participated and were allocated into two groups : the biomarker feedback group ( BF ) and the follow-up smoking status group ( FS ) . The subjects were asked for their smoking status at enrolment and at 3- and 9-month follow-ups . BF subjects were notified about their L-myc genotype . RESULTS The smoking cessation rate at 9-month follow-up was essentially the same for both BF and FS cases , at 18.8 % and 17.0 % , respectively ( P = 0.798 ) . However , a difference in the rate was evident with non-cancer subjects ( 12.7 % and 8.4 % , respectively , P = 0.237 ) , especially in females ( 15.0 % and 4.2 % , respectively , P = 0.024 ) . The non-cancer subjects informed of their genotype were more likely to quit smoking than the FS patients ; particularly in those having a risky genotype , this was significant ( odds ratio : 2.87 , P = 0.003 ) . Again it was most prominent in females . CONCLUSION Feedback regarding an L-myc polymorphism did not impact on smoking cessation overall but appeared to benefit smokers without cancer . In addition , gender could affect the response to the feedback
Several studies of good quality demonstrated changes in lifestyle habits arising from the provision of genetic interventions .
The most promising lifestyle changes were changes in nutrition .
Conclusions : It is possible to facilitate behaviour change using genetic testing as the catalyst .
Background : Study ing the impact of  genetic testing interventions on lifestyle behaviour change  has been a priority area of research in recent years .
Substantial heterogeneity exists in the results and conclusions of this literature , which has yet to be explained using vali date d behaviour change theory and an assessment of the quality of genetic interventions .
The theory of planned behaviour ( TPB ) helps to explain key contributors to behaviour change .
It has been hypothesized that personalization could be added to this theory to help predict changes in health behaviours .
Purpose : This systematic review provides a detailed , comprehensive identification , assessment , and summary of primary research articles pertaining to  lifestyle behaviour change  ( nutrition , physical activity , sleep , and smoking ) result ing from  genetic testing interventions .
The present review further aims to provide in-depth analyses of studies conducted to date within the context of the TPB and the quality of genetic interventions provided to participants while aim ing to determine whether or not genetic testing facilitates changes in lifestyle habits .
This review is timely in light of a recently published “ call-to-action ” paper , highlighting the need to incorporate the TPB into personalized healthcare behaviour change research .