High test-retest reliability was found for the Function component , while results for the Disability component were more variable .
Conclusions There is extensive evidence to support the construct validity and sensitivity to change of the LLFDI among various clinical population s of community-dwelling older adults .
Background The choice of measure for use as a primary outcome in geriatric research is contingent upon the construct of interest and evidence for its psychometric properties .
The Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument ( LLFDI ) has been widely used to assess functional limitations and disability in studies with older adults .
The primary aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the current available evidence for the psychometric properties of the LLFDI .
Impact of Exercise to Improve Gait Efficiency on Activity and Participation in Older Adults With Mobility Limitations: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Background Definitive evidence that exercise interventions that improve gait also reduce disability is lacking . A task-oriented , motor sequence learning exercise intervention has been shown to reduce the energy cost of walking and improve gait speed , but whether the intervention also improves activity and participation has not been demonstrated . Objective The objective of this study was to compare the impact of a task-oriented , motor sequence learning exercise ( TO ) intervention and the impact of an impairment-oriented , multicomponent exercise ( IO ) intervention on activity and participation outcomes in older adults with mobility limitations . The mediating effects of a change in the energy cost of walking on changes in activity and participation also were determined . Design This study was a single-blind , r and omized controlled trial . Setting The study was conducted in an ambulatory clinical research training center . Participants The study participants were 47 older adults ( mean age=77.2 years , SD=5.5 ) with slow and variable gait . Intervention The intervention was a 12-week , physical therapist – guided program of TO or IO . Measurements Measures of activity ( gait speed over an instrumented walkway ; daily physical activity measured with an accelerometer ; confidence in walking determined with the Gait Efficacy Scale ; and physical function determined with the total , basic lower-extremity , and advanced lower-extremity components of the Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument [ Late-Life FDI ] ) and participation ( disability limitation dimension and instrumental role [ home and community task performance ] domain components of the Late-Life FDI ) were recorded before and after the intervention . The energy cost of walking was determined from the rate of oxygen consumption during self-paced treadmill walking at the physiological steady state st and ardized by walking speed . An adjusted comparison of activity and participation outcomes in the treatment arms was made by use of an analysis of covariance model , with baseline and change in energy cost of walking added to the model to test for mediation . Tests were used to determine the significance of the mediating effects . Results Activity improved in TO but not in IO for confidence in walking ( Gait Efficacy Scale ; mean adjusted difference=9.8 [ SD=3.5 ] ) and physical function ( Late-Life FDI basic lower-extremity component ; mean adjusted difference=3.5 [ SD=1.7 ] ) . Improvements in TO were marginally greater than those in IO for gait speed , physical activity , and total physical function . Participation improved marginally more in TO than in IO for disability limitations and instrumental role . Limitations The older adults were r and omized to the intervention group , but differences in baseline measures had to be accounted for in the analyses . Conclusions A TO intervention that improved gait also led to improvements in some activity and participation outcomes in older adults with mobility limitations
High test-retest reliability was found for the Function component , while results for the Disability component were more variable .
Conclusions There is extensive evidence to support the construct validity and sensitivity to change of the LLFDI among various clinical population s of community-dwelling older adults .
Background The choice of measure for use as a primary outcome in geriatric research is contingent upon the construct of interest and evidence for its psychometric properties .
The Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument ( LLFDI ) has been widely used to assess functional limitations and disability in studies with older adults .
The primary aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the current available evidence for the psychometric properties of the LLFDI .