At costs lower than $ 0.10 per pill , treating all persons with LDL cholesterol levels greater than 3.4 mmol/L ( > 130 mg/dL ) could be a better strategy .
Previous cost-effectiveness analyses ( 719 ) show that statin therapy is generally cost-effective for secondary prevention and for high-risk primary prevention but do not focus on population -level impact or average cost-effectiveness across the heterogeneous U.S. population , including such subgroups of patients as those with low risk but very high cholesterol levels .
Also , it is unclear whether the ATP III approach to risk stratification , in which risk is formally assessed only for patients with 2 or more established risk factors , is the simplest and most cost-effective way of targeting statin therapy .
The 2004 up date to ATP III ( 3 ) notes that treatment of high-risk subgroups may be useful even when cholesterol levels are low , which suggests that a more purely risk-based approach may be simpler and more cost-effective than the ATP III approach .
Context Which lipid-lowering policies with statins are cost-effective ?
Implication Optimum policies for lipid lowering with statins are highly dependent on statin costs .
The Editors Coronary heart disease ( CHD ) is the leading cause of death in the United States ( 1 ) .
Inhibitors of HMG-CoA reductase , known as statins , lower cholesterol and prevent CHD events and mortality ( 2 , 3 ) .
However , statins are expensive and sometimes cause side effects , which makes it difficult for patients , physicians , and policymakers to decide who should receive them .
The CHD Policy Model is a mathematical state-transition model of CHD in the United States that can be used to project event rates and costs related to CHD .
Lifetime cost effectiveness of simvastatin in a range of risk groups and age groups derived from a randomised trial of 20 536 people
Objectives To evaluate the cost effectiveness of 40 mg simvastatin daily continued for life in people of different ages with differing risks of vascular disease . Design A model developed from a r and omised trial was used to estimate lifetime risks of vascular events and costs of treatment and hospital admissions in the United Kingdom . Setting 69 hospitals in the UK . Participants 20 536 men and women ( aged 40 - 80 ) with coronary disease , other occlusive arterial disease , or diabetes . Interventions 40 mg simvastatin daily versus placebo for an average of 5 years . Main outcome measures Cost effectiveness of 40 mg simvastatin daily expressed as additional cost per life year gained . Major vascular event defined as non-fatal myocardial infa rct ion or death from coronary disease , any stroke , or revascularisation procedure . Results were extrapolated to younger and older age groups at lower risk of vascular disease than were studied directly , as well as to lifetime treatment . Results At the April 2005 UK price of � 4.87 ( € 7 ; $ 9 ) per 28 day pack of generic 40 mg simvastatin , lifetime treatment was cost saving in most age groups and vascular disease risk groups studied directly . Gains in life expectancy and cost savings decreased with increasing age and with decreasing risk of vascular disease . People aged 40 - 49 with 5 year risks of major vascular events of 42 % and 12 % at start of treatment gained 2.49 and 1.67 life years , respectively . Treatment with statins  remained cost saving or cost less than � 2500 per life year gained in people as young as 35 years or as old as 85 with 5 year risks of a major vascular event as low as 5 % at the start of treatment . Conclusions Treatment with statins  is cost effective in a wider population than is routinely treated at present
At costs lower than $ 0.10 per pill , treating all persons with LDL cholesterol levels greater than 3.4 mmol/L ( > 130 mg/dL ) could be a better strategy .
Previous cost-effectiveness analyses ( 719 ) show that statin therapy is generally cost-effective for secondary prevention and for high-risk primary prevention but do not focus on population -level impact or average cost-effectiveness across the heterogeneous U.S. population , including such subgroups of patients as those with low risk but very high cholesterol levels .
Also , it is unclear whether the ATP III approach to risk stratification , in which risk is formally assessed only for patients with 2 or more established risk factors , is the simplest and most cost-effective way of targeting statin therapy .
The 2004 up date to ATP III ( 3 ) notes that treatment of high-risk subgroups may be useful even when cholesterol levels are low , which suggests that a more purely risk-based approach may be simpler and more cost-effective than the ATP III approach .
Context Which lipid-lowering policies with statins are cost-effective ?
Implication Optimum policies for lipid lowering with statins are highly dependent on statin costs .
The Editors Coronary heart disease ( CHD ) is the leading cause of death in the United States ( 1 ) .
Inhibitors of HMG-CoA reductase , known as statins , lower cholesterol and prevent CHD events and mortality ( 2 , 3 ) .
However , statins are expensive and sometimes cause side effects , which makes it difficult for patients , physicians , and policymakers to decide who should receive them .
The CHD Policy Model is a mathematical state-transition model of CHD in the United States that can be used to project event rates and costs related to CHD .