The overall results for modifiable risk factors suggested improvements in dietary and exercise outcomes but no overall effect on smoking outcomes .
The effectiveness of lifestyle interventions within secondary prevention of coronary heart disease ( CHD ) remains unclear .
This systematic review aim ed to determine their effectiveness and included r and omized controlled trials of lifestyle interventions , in primary care or community setting s , with a minimum follow-up of three months , published since 1990 .
Choice of secondary prevention improves risk factors after acute coronary syndrome: 1-year follow-up of the CHOICE (Choice of Health Options In prevention of Cardiovascular Events) randomised controlled trial
Objective : To determine the effect of a new CHOICE ( Choice of Health Options In prevention of Cardiovascular Events ) programme on cardiovascular risk factors in acute coronary syndrome ( ACS ) survivors . Design : Single-blind r and omised controlled trial . Setting : Tertiary referral hospital in Sydney Australia . Patients : 144 ACS survivors who were not accessing st and ard cardiac rehabilitation .  Data were also collected on a further 64 ACS survivors attending st and ard cardiac rehabilitation . Intervention : The CHOICE group ( n = 72 ) participated in a brief , patient-centred , modular programme comprising a clinic visit plus telephone support , encompassing m and atory cholesterol lowering and tailored preferential risk modification . The control group ( n = 72 ) participated in continuing conventional care but no central ly coordinated secondary prevention . Main outcome measures : Values for total cholesterol , systolic blood pressure , smoking status and physical activity . Results : CHOICE and control groups were well matched at baseline . At 12 months , the CHOICE group ( n = 67 ) had significantly better risk factor levels than controls ( n = 69 ) for total cholesterol ( TC ) ( mean ( SEM ) 4.0 ( 0.1 ) vs 4.7 ( 0.1 ) mmol/l , p<0.001 ) , systolic blood pressure ( 131.6 ( 1.8 ) vs 143.9 ( 2.3 ) mm Hg , p<0.001 ) , body mass index ( 28.9 ( 0.7 ) vs 31.2 ( 0.7 ) kg/m2 , p = 0.025 ) and physical activity ( 1369.1 ( 167.2 ) vs 715.1 ( 103.5 ) METS/kg/min , p = 0.001 ) as well as a better knowledge of risk factor targets . Also at 1 year , fewer CHOICE participants ( 21 % ) had three or more risk factors above widely recommended levels then controls ( 72 % ) ( p<0.001 ) . Conclusions : Participation in a brief CHOICE programme significantly improved the modifiable risk profiles and risk factor knowledge of ACS survivors over 12 months . CHOICE is an effective alternative for dealing with the widespread underuse of existing secondary prevention programmes . Trial registration number : IS RCT
The overall results for modifiable risk factors suggested improvements in dietary and exercise outcomes but no overall effect on smoking outcomes .
The effectiveness of lifestyle interventions within secondary prevention of coronary heart disease ( CHD ) remains unclear .
This systematic review aim ed to determine their effectiveness and included r and omized controlled trials of lifestyle interventions , in primary care or community setting s , with a minimum follow-up of three months , published since 1990 .