Sensitivity analysis indicates that from both perspectives the service is very cost effective and may be cost saving .
CONCLUSIONS These results make alcohol screening and counseling one of the highest-ranking preventive services among the 25 effective services evaluated using st and ardized methods .
BACKGROUND The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force ( USPSTF ) has recommended screening and behavioral counseling interventions in primary care to reduce alcohol misuse .
This study was design ed to develop a st and ardized rating for the clinical ly preventable burden and cost effectiveness of complying with that recommendation that would allow comparisons across many recommended services .
Brief physician- and nurse practitioner-delivered counseling for high-risk drinkers: does it work?
BACKGROUND There is a need for primary care providers to have brief effective methods to intervene with high-risk drinkers during a regular outpatient visit . OBJECTIVE To determine whether brief physician- and nurse practitioner-delivered counseling intervention is efficacious as part of routine primary care in reducing alcohol consumption by high-risk drinkers . METHODS Academic medical center-affiliated primary care practice sites were r and omized to special intervention or to usual care .  From a screened population of 9772 patients seeking routine medical care with their primary care providers , 530 high-risk drinkers were entered into the study . Special intervention included training providers in a brief ( 5- to 10-minute ) patient-centered counseling intervention , and an office support system that screened patients , cued providers to intervene , and made patient education material s available . The primary outcome measures were change in alcohol use from baseline to 6 months as measured by weekly alcohol consumption and frequency of binge drinking episodes . RESULTS Participants in the special intervention and usual care groups were similar on important background variables and potential confounders except that special intervention participants had significantly higher baseline levels of alcohol usage ( P = .01 ) . At 6-month follow-up , in the 91 % of the cohort who provided follow-up information , alcohol consumption was significantly reduced when adjusted for age , sex , and baseline alcohol usage ( special intervention , -5.8 drinks per week ; usual care , -3.4 drinks per week ; P = .001 ) . CONCLUSIONS This study provides evidence that screening and very brief ( 5- to 10-minute ) advice and counseling delivered by a physician or nurse practitioner as part of routine primary care significantly reduces alcohol consumption by high-risk drinkers
Sensitivity analysis indicates that from both perspectives the service is very cost effective and may be cost saving .
CONCLUSIONS These results make alcohol screening and counseling one of the highest-ranking preventive services among the 25 effective services evaluated using st and ardized methods .
BACKGROUND The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force ( USPSTF ) has recommended screening and behavioral counseling interventions in primary care to reduce alcohol misuse .
This study was design ed to develop a st and ardized rating for the clinical ly preventable burden and cost effectiveness of complying with that recommendation that would allow comparisons across many recommended services .