Results The consensus panel agreed on the following statements in patients with AF undergoing cardiac surgery concomitant surgical ablation : 1 .
Improves the achievement of sinus rhythm at discharge and 1 year ( level A ) ; this effect is sustained up to 5 years ( level B ) .
2 .
3 .
Does not increase the risk of perioperative mortality ( level A ) , stroke ( level A ) , myocardial infa rct ion ( level B ) , cardiac tamponade ( level A ) , reoperative bleeding ( level A ) , esophageal injury ( level B ) , low cardiac output ( level A ) , intraaortic balloon ( level B ) , congestive heart failure ( level B ) , ejection fraction ( EF ; level B ) , pleural effusion ( level A ) , pneumonia ( level A ) , renal dysfunction ( level B ) , and mediastinitis ( level A ) .
The incidence of esophageal injury remains to be low ( level B ) .
4 .
Does not reduce mortality at 1 year ( level A ) .
5 .
6 .
Increases cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp times ( level A ) , with no difference in intensive care unit and hospital length of stay ( level A ) .
Conclusions Given these evidence -based statements , the consensus panel stated that , in patients with persistent and permanent AF undergoing cardiac surgery , concomitant surgical ablation is recommended to increase incidence of sinus rhythm at short- and long-term follow-up ( class 1 , level A ) ; to reduce the risk of stroke and thromboembolic events ( class 2a , level B ) ; to improve EF ( class 2a , level A ) ; and to exercise tolerance ( class 2a , level A ) and long-term survival ( class 2a , level B )
Objective This purpose of this consensus conference was to determine whether surgical atrial fibrillation ( AF ) ablation during cardiac surgery improves clinical and re source outcomes compared with cardiac surgery alone in adults undergoing cardiac surgery for valve or coronary artery bypass grafting .
Efficacy of three different ablative procedures to treat atrial fibrillation in patients with valvular heart disease: a randomised trial.
OBJECTIVES Various modifications have been proposed to the original Cox 's Maze procedure due to concerns about the long bypass and cross clamp times . The efficacy of these procedures has been studied and reported . We conducted a r and omised prospect i ve study to compare three procedures , differing in extent , of ablation in patients in atrial fibrillation who were undergoing surgery for rheumatic valvular heart disease . These procedures utilised radiofrequency in the bipolar mode . The extent of ablation was ( 1 ) biatrial ( replication of the Cox Maze ) ( 2 ) left atrial portion of the Cox Maze and ( 3 ) pulmonary vein isolation along with a control group ( the No Maze group ) . Conversion rate to sinus rhythm was studied over a mid-term follow-up period . METHODS A total of 160 patients were studied with 40 patients in each group .  Antiarrhythmic drugs were not used in the three months preceding surgery and for seven days postoperatively . The patients underwent surgery for their valve disease along with the ablative procedure as per r and omisation using radiofrequency microbipolar coagulation and cryoablation . They were followed up and were evaluated for symptomatic improvement , rhythm with ECG documentation and 2D echocardiography . RESULTS Follow-up was available for 133 patients . Mid-term results showed that sinus rhythm was restored in 62.5 % patients of Biatrial Maze group and 57.5 % in the Left Atrial Maze . In the Pulmonary Vein Isolation Maze group , 67.5 % patients converted to NSR whereas in the No Maze group only 20 % patients were in sinus rhythm ( p value for all the groups was 0.001 when compared to the No Maze group ) . The incidence of other arrhythmias was not significant and there were no other major complications . All the patients in sinus rhythm at follow-up were in NYHA functional class I-II and showed good effort tolerance . CONCLUSIONS Results achieved with the three ablative procedures are comparable . Therefore lesser procedures viz . Left Atrial Maze and the Pulmonary Vein Isolation Maze procedures must be studied further with the additional use of antiarrhythmic drugs
Results The consensus panel agreed on the following statements in patients with AF undergoing cardiac surgery concomitant surgical ablation : 1 .
Improves the achievement of sinus rhythm at discharge and 1 year ( level A ) ; this effect is sustained up to 5 years ( level B ) .
2 .
3 .
Does not increase the risk of perioperative mortality ( level A ) , stroke ( level A ) , myocardial infa rct ion ( level B ) , cardiac tamponade ( level A ) , reoperative bleeding ( level A ) , esophageal injury ( level B ) , low cardiac output ( level A ) , intraaortic balloon ( level B ) , congestive heart failure ( level B ) , ejection fraction ( EF ; level B ) , pleural effusion ( level A ) , pneumonia ( level A ) , renal dysfunction ( level B ) , and mediastinitis ( level A ) .
The incidence of esophageal injury remains to be low ( level B ) .
4 .
Does not reduce mortality at 1 year ( level A ) .
5 .
6 .
Increases cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp times ( level A ) , with no difference in intensive care unit and hospital length of stay ( level A ) .
Conclusions Given these evidence -based statements , the consensus panel stated that , in patients with persistent and permanent AF undergoing cardiac surgery , concomitant surgical ablation is recommended to increase incidence of sinus rhythm at short- and long-term follow-up ( class 1 , level A ) ; to reduce the risk of stroke and thromboembolic events ( class 2a , level B ) ; to improve EF ( class 2a , level A ) ; and to exercise tolerance ( class 2a , level A ) and long-term survival ( class 2a , level B )
Objective This purpose of this consensus conference was to determine whether surgical atrial fibrillation ( AF ) ablation during cardiac surgery improves clinical and re source outcomes compared with cardiac surgery alone in adults undergoing cardiac surgery for valve or coronary artery bypass grafting .