After stratification on follow-up time and age , the revision rates were not substantially different , aside for younger patients in short term from studies with short-term follow-up .
Conclusion No essential differences between the two design s were observed .
MB and FB UKA design s have comparable revision rates .
Purpose Two design concepts are currently used for unicondylar knee arthroplasty ( UKA ) prostheses :  fixed bearing ( FB ) and mobile bearing ( MB ) .
While MB prostheses have theoretical advantages over their FB counterparts , it is not clear whether they are associated with better outcomes .
Mobile vs. fixed bearing unicondylar knee arthroplasty: A randomized study on short term clinical outcomes and knee kinematics.
The literature contains limited yet controversial information regarding whether a fixed or a mobile bearing implant should be used in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty ( UKA ) . This r and omized study was to further document the performance and comparison of the two design s. Fifty-six knees in 48 patients ( mean age of 72 years ) undergoing medial UKA were r and omized into a fixed bearing ( Miller/Galante ) or a mobile bearing ( Oxford ) UKA . The 2 year clinical outcomes ( clinical scores ) , radiographic findings , and weight bearing knee kinematics ( assessed using RSA ) were compared between the two groups . The mobile bearing knees displayed a larger and an incrementally increased tibial internal rotation ( 4.3 degrees , 7.6 degrees , 9.5 degrees vs. 3.0 degrees , 3.0 degrees , 4.2 degrees respectively at 30 degrees , 60 degrees , 90 degrees of knee flexion ) compared to the fixed ones . The medial femoral condyle in the mobile bearing knees remained 2 mm from the initial position vs. a 4.2 mm anterior translation in the fixed bearing knees during knee flexion . The contact point in the mobile bearing implant moved 2 mm posteriorly vs. a 6 mm anterior movement in the other group . The mobile bearing knees had a lower incidence of radiolucency at the bone implant interface ( 8 % vs. 37 % , p < 0.05 ) . The incidence of lateral compartment OA and progression of OA at patello-femoral joint were equal . No differences were found regarding Knee Society Scores , WOMAC , and SF-36 scores ( p > 0.05 ) . This study indicates that mobile bearing knees had a better kinematics , a lower incidence of radiolucency but not yet a better knee function at 2 years
After stratification on follow-up time and age , the revision rates were not substantially different , aside for younger patients in short term from studies with short-term follow-up .
Conclusion No essential differences between the two design s were observed .
MB and FB UKA design s have comparable revision rates .
Purpose Two design concepts are currently used for unicondylar knee arthroplasty ( UKA ) prostheses :  fixed bearing ( FB ) and mobile bearing ( MB ) .
While MB prostheses have theoretical advantages over their FB counterparts , it is not clear whether they are associated with better outcomes .