Educational interventions did not seem to have a positive impact on HbA1c , systolic blood pressure or lipid profiles .
The use of telemedicine , clinician reminders and feedback showed mixed results but there was a level of consistency in improvement in HbA1c when multifaceted interventions on multidisciplinary teams were implemented .
Targeting general or family physicians was largely ineffective in improving the cardiovascular risk factors considered , except when using a computer application on insulin h and ling of type 2 diabetes or customised simulated cases with feedbacks .
Similarly , interventions targeting nurses did not improve outcomes compared to st and ard care .
Multifaceted professional interventions were more effective than single interventions targeting single primary or community care professionals in improving glycaemic control
OBJECTIVE To review the interventions targeting primary care or community based professionals on glycaemic and cardiovascular risk factor control in people with diabetes .
No magic bullets: a systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice.
OBJECTIVE To determine the effectiveness of different types of interventions in improving  health professional performance and health outcomes . DATA SOURCES MEDLINE , SCI SEARCH , CINAHL and the Research and Development Re source Base in CME were search ed for trials of  educational interventions in the health care professions published between 1970 and 1993 inclusive . STUDY SELECTION Studies were selected if they provided objective measurements of  health professional performance or health outcomes  and employed r and om or quasi-r and om allocation methods in their study design s to assign individual subjects or groups . Interventions included such activities as conferences , outreach visits , the use of local opinion leaders , audit and feedback , and reminder systems . DATA EXTRACTION Details extracted from the studies included the study design ; the unit of allocation ( e.g. , patient , provider , practice , hospital ) ; the characteristics of the targeted health care professionals , educational interventions and patients ( when appropriate ) ; and the main outcome measure . DATA SYNTHESIS The inclusion criteria were met by 102 trials . Areas of behaviour change included general patient management , preventive services , prescribing practice s , treatment of specific conditions such as hypertension or diabetes , and diagnostic service or hospital utilization . Dissemination-only strategies , such as conferences or the mailing of unsolicited material s , demonstrated little or no changes in health professional behaviour or health outcome when used alone . More complex interventions , such as the use of outreach visits or local opinion leaders , ranged from ineffective to highly effective but were most often moderately effective ( result ing in reductions of 20 % to 50 % in the incidence of inappropriate performance ) . CONCLUSION There are no " magic bullets " for improving the quality of health care , but there are a wide range of interventions available that , if used appropriately , could lead to important improvements in professional practice and patient outcomes
Educational interventions did not seem to have a positive impact on HbA1c , systolic blood pressure or lipid profiles .
The use of telemedicine , clinician reminders and feedback showed mixed results but there was a level of consistency in improvement in HbA1c when multifaceted interventions on multidisciplinary teams were implemented .
Targeting general or family physicians was largely ineffective in improving the cardiovascular risk factors considered , except when using a computer application on insulin h and ling of type 2 diabetes or customised simulated cases with feedbacks .
Similarly , interventions targeting nurses did not improve outcomes compared to st and ard care .
Multifaceted professional interventions were more effective than single interventions targeting single primary or community care professionals in improving glycaemic control
OBJECTIVE To review the interventions targeting primary care or community based professionals on glycaemic and cardiovascular risk factor control in people with diabetes .