A significant positive effect of the interventions on weight was reported by all study types .
The meta- analysis showed that lifestyle interventions achieved weight and waist circumference reductions after one year .
However , no clear effects on biochemical or clinical parameters were observed , possibly due to short follow-up periods or lack of power of the studies meta-analysed .
Changes in dietary parameters or physical activity were generally not reported .
Most studies assessing feasibility were supportive of implementation of lifestyle interventions in routine clinical care .
Conclusion Lifestyle interventions for patients at high risk of diabetes , delivered by a variety of healthcare providers in routine clinical setting s , are feasible but appear to be of limited clinical benefit one year after intervention .
Despite convincing evidence from structured intensive trials , this systematic review showed that translation into routine practice has less effect on diabetes risk reduction
Background The clinical effectiveness of intensive lifestyle interventions in preventing or delaying diabetes in people at high risk has been established from r and omised trials of structured , intensive interventions conducted in several countries over the past two decades .
The challenge is to translate them into routine clinical setting s. The objective of this review is to determine whether lifestyle interventions delivered to high-risk adult patients in routine clinical care setting s are feasible and effective in achieving reductions in risk factors for diabetes .
One-year results from a brief, computer-assisted intervention to decrease consumption of fat and increase consumption of fruits and vegetables.
BACKGROUND Current cancer prevention recommendations include reducing consumption of fat and increasing consumption of fruits and vegetables . METHODS Healthy women health maintenance organization members ( n = 616 ) ages 40 - 70 were r and omly assigned to either a nutrition intervention or a control intervention unrelated to diet . Intervention included two 45-min counseling sessions plus two brief follow-up telephone contacts . Counseling sessions included a 20-min , interactive , computer-based intervention using a touch-screen format . Intervention goals were reducing dietary fat and increasing fruit and vegetable consumption . Outcome measures included a food frequency question naire and the Fat and Fiber Behavior Question naire ( FFBQ ) . Total serum cholesterol was also measured at baseline and 12 months . RESULTS Twelve-month follow-up data showed improvements on all dietary outcome variables . Compared to the control , intervention participants reported significantly less fat consumption ( 3.75 points less for percentage of energy from fat ) , significantly greater consumption of fruit and vegetables combined ( 0.93 more servings per day ) , and a significant reduction in a behavioral measure of fat consumption ( 0.20 point change in the FFBQ ) . Group differences in total serum cholesterol , while in the desired direction , were not significant . CONCLUSIONS In appropriate circumstances , moderate-intensity dietary interventions can show significant effects for periods of at least 1 year
A significant positive effect of the interventions on weight was reported by all study types .
The meta- analysis showed that lifestyle interventions achieved weight and waist circumference reductions after one year .
However , no clear effects on biochemical or clinical parameters were observed , possibly due to short follow-up periods or lack of power of the studies meta-analysed .
Changes in dietary parameters or physical activity were generally not reported .
Most studies assessing feasibility were supportive of implementation of lifestyle interventions in routine clinical care .
Conclusion Lifestyle interventions for patients at high risk of diabetes , delivered by a variety of healthcare providers in routine clinical setting s , are feasible but appear to be of limited clinical benefit one year after intervention .
Despite convincing evidence from structured intensive trials , this systematic review showed that translation into routine practice has less effect on diabetes risk reduction
Background The clinical effectiveness of intensive lifestyle interventions in preventing or delaying diabetes in people at high risk has been established from r and omised trials of structured , intensive interventions conducted in several countries over the past two decades .
The challenge is to translate them into routine clinical setting s. The objective of this review is to determine whether lifestyle interventions delivered to high-risk adult patients in routine clinical care setting s are feasible and effective in achieving reductions in risk factors for diabetes .