IATs improve intracanal cleanliness across a substantial portion of the canal , and therefore , their use is recommended throughout root canal preparation .
AIMS To establish whether irrigant activation techniques ( IATs ) result in greater intracanal smear layer and debris removal than conventional needle irrigation ( CNI ) .
Effectiveness of various irrigation activation protocols and the self-adjusting file system on smear layer and debris removal.
The purpose of the present study is to evaluate smear layer generation and residual debris after using self-adjusting file ( SAF ) or rotary instrumentation and to compare the debris and smear layer removal efficacy of the SAF cleaning/shaping irrigation system against final agitation techniques . One hundred and eight maxillary lateral incisor teeth were r and omly divided into nine experimental groups ( n = 12 ) , and root canals were prepared using ProTaper Universal rotary files , with the exception of the SAF instrumentation group . During instrumentation , root canals were irrigated with a total of 16 mL of 5 % NaOCl . For final irrigation , rotary-instrumented groups were irrigated with 10 mL of 17 % EDTA and 10 mL of 5 % NaOCl using different irrigation agitation regimens ( syringe irrigation with needles , NaviTip FX , manual dynamic irrigation , CanalBrush , EndoActivator , EndoVac , passive ultrasonic irrigation ( PUI ) , and SAF irrigation ) . In the SAF instrumentation group , root canals were instrumented for 4 min at a rate of 4 mL/min with 5 % NaOCl and received a final flush with same as syringe irrigation with needles . The surface of the root dentin was observed using a scanning electron microscope . The SAF instrumentation group generated less smear layer and yielded cleaner canals compared to rotary instrumentation . The EndoActivator , EndoVac , PUI , and SAF irrigation groups increased the efficacy of irrigating solutions on the smear layer and debris removal . The SAF instrumentation yielded cleaner canal walls when compared to rotary instrumentation . None of the techniques completely removed the smear layer from the root canal walls
IATs improve intracanal cleanliness across a substantial portion of the canal , and therefore , their use is recommended throughout root canal preparation .
AIMS To establish whether irrigant activation techniques ( IATs ) result in greater intracanal smear layer and debris removal than conventional needle irrigation ( CNI ) .