Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
Can a Multimodal Mind–Body Program Enhance the Treatment Effects of Physical Activity in Breast Cancer Survivors With Chronic Tumor-Associated Fatigue? A Randomized Controlled Trial
Background . Chronic fatigue is one of the most restricting symptoms following primary breast cancer treatment , but clinical studies on symptom management are rare . The objective was to evaluate the impact of a multimodal mind – body program ( MMMT ) , including moderate physical activity as compared with a walking intervention alone , on chronic fatigue symptoms of women with stage I to IIIA breast cancer . Patients and Methods . Sixty-four women ( mean age = 56.7 years ) suffering from chronic fatigue after active tumor treatment were r and omly assigned to either an experimental or a control ( n = 32 each ) intervention ( 10 weeks ) . Fatigue , quality of life ( QoL ) , functional well-being , anxiety , and depression were measured with st and ard question naires at baseline , after 10 weeks , and after 3 months . Results . Compared with baseline , both groups had reduced fatigue scores after treatment without any significant difference between groups ( posttreatment , Δ = −0.3 , confidence interval = −1.6 to 1.0 , P = .678 ; follow-up , Δ = −0.4 , confidence interval = −1.8 to 0.9 , P = .510 ) . All patients also improved regarding QoL and general functional well-being . Conclusion . Since both interventions reduced fatigue symptoms and enhanced QoL to a similar extent , we observed no verifiable add-on effect of the MMMT  regarding fatigue symptoms . Considering the higher costs with additional expenditure related to MMMT , home-based walking intervention is recommended
Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?