Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
Lifestyle and health-related quality of life of men with prostate cancer managed with active surveillance.
OBJECTIVES To assess the impact of lifestyle on health-related quality of life ( HR-QOL ) , perceived stress , and self-reported sexual function in men with early-stage prostate cancer electing active surveillance . METHODS A total of 44 intervention and 49 usual-care control participants were enrolled in a r and omized clinical trial examining the effects of lifestyle changes on prostate cancer progression . The intervention consisted of a low-fat , vegan diet , exercise , and stress management . Participants completed the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 Health Status Survey ( a measure of mental and physical HR-QOL ) , the Perceived Stress Scale , the Sexual Function subscale of the University of California , Los Angeles , Prostate Cancer Index , and  measures of lifestyle behaviors  ( to yield an overall lifestyle  index ) at baseline and 12 months . The data were analyzed using analysis of variance for repeated measures . The relationship between lifestyle and QOL was also analyzed using multiple linear regression analyses . RESULTS Intervention participants had significantly improved their lifestyle compared with controls at 12 months . The quality -of-life scores were high across groups and time points . However , a healthier lifestyle was related to better QOL at baseline . Participants in both groups who reported a healthier lifestyle also reported better mental and physical HR-QOL and sexual function . Furthermore , participants whose lifestyle improved over time showed enhanced physical HR-QOL and decreased perceived stress . CONCLUSIONS Men who choose active surveillance for early-stage prostate cancer are able to make comprehensive lifestyle changes . Although the average QOL was already high in this sample , individuals who improved their lifestyle enhanced their QOL further
Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?