There were no differences between the groups in mortality rate , body mass index , blood pressure and lipid profile .
Conclusions Group-based DSME in people with type 2 diabetes results in improvements in clinical , lifestyle and psychosocial outcomes
Background Diabetes self-management education ( DSME ) can be delivered in many forms .
Group based DSME is widespread due to being a cheaper method and the added advantages of having patient meet and discuss with each other .
assess effects of group-based DSME compared to routine treatment on clinical , lifestyle and psychosocial outcomes in type-2 diabetes patients .
Experience-based group education in Type 2 diabetes: a randomised controlled trial.
Few studies have demonstrated an effect of educational interventions on glycaemic control in persons with Type 2 diabetes longer than 3 - 6 months after baseline . We aim ed to investigate the effectiveness of an experience-based group educational programme 24 months after baseline and to pinpoint mediators that might play a role in achieving desired metabolic outcomes . We conducted a r and omised controlled trial inviting self-referred persons with Type 2 diabetes ( N=77 r and omised ) . The pharmacist-led , year-long intervention was based on participants ' experiences of glucose regulation during the monthly group discussion s. We measured HbA1c at 0 , 6 , 12 , and 24 months and a question naire was administered at baseline and final follow-up . Our findings indicated that participating in the intervention programme significantly decreased HbA1c by 0.4 % at 24 months after baseline . Initial HbA1c , satisfaction with own diabetes-related knowledge , and treatment were found directly related to glycaemic outcomes . The intervention group exercised more in order to lower blood-glucose levels and was also more able to predict current blood-glucose levels before measuring it . Experience-based group education was effective in decreasing participants ' HbA1c 1-year after completed intervention . Early effect of the intervention was followed by relapse after 12 months and a new , significant decrease at 24 months ; this dual course implies that follow-up of educational interventions should involve several consecutive measurements to capture possible late effects . Both biomedical and subjective factors played a role in accounting for the variance of HbA1c at 2-year follow-up after baseline
There were no differences between the groups in mortality rate , body mass index , blood pressure and lipid profile .
Conclusions Group-based DSME in people with type 2 diabetes results in improvements in clinical , lifestyle and psychosocial outcomes
Background Diabetes self-management education ( DSME ) can be delivered in many forms .
Group based DSME is widespread due to being a cheaper method and the added advantages of having patient meet and discuss with each other .
assess effects of group-based DSME compared to routine treatment on clinical , lifestyle and psychosocial outcomes in type-2 diabetes patients .