Conclusion These studies provide preliminary evidence suggesting that EAMS can increase physical activity and decrease weight significantly , but their efficacy compared to other interventions has not yet been demonstrated .
Background Obesity is a growing global health concern that may lead to cardiovascular disease , type II diabetes , and cancer .
Several systematic review s have shown that technology is successful in combating obesity through increased physical activity , but there is no known review on interventions that use an electronic activity monitor system ( EAMS ) .
EAMSs are defined as a wearable device that objective ly measures lifestyle physical activity and can provide feedback , beyond the display of basic activity count information , via the monitor display or through a partnering application to elicit continual self-monitoring of activity behavior .
These devices improve upon st and ard pedometers because they have the ability to provide visual feedback on activity progression , verbal encouragement , and social comparison .
This systematic review aim ed to synthesize the efficacy and feasibility results of EAMSs within published physical activity interventions .
The comparison of a technology-based system and an in-person behavioral weight loss intervention.
The purpose of this study was to compare a technology-based system , an in-person behavioral weight loss intervention , and a combination of both over a 6-month period in overweight adults . Fifty-one subjects ( age : 44.2 ± 8.7 years , BMI : 33.7 ± 3.6 kg/m(2 ) ) participated in a 6-month behavioral weight loss program and were r and omized to one of three groups : st and ard behavioral weight loss ( SBWL ) , SBWL plus technology-based system ( SBWL+TECH ) , or technology-based system only ( TECH ) . All groups reduced caloric intake and progressively increased moderate intensity physical activity . SBWL and SBWL+TECH attended weekly meetings . SBWL+TECH also received a TECH that included an energy monitoring armb and and website to monitor energy intake and expenditure . TECH used the technology system and received monthly telephone calls . Body weight and physical activity were assessed at 0 and 6 months . Retention at 6 months was significantly different ( P = 0.005 ) between groups ( SBWL : 53 % , SBWL+TECH : 100 % , and TECH : 77 % ) . Intent-to-treat ( ITT ) analysis revealed significant weight losses at 6 months in SBWL+TECH ( -8.8 ± 5.0 kg , -8.7 ± 4.7 % ) , SBWL ( -3.7 ± 5.7 kg , -4.1 ± 6.3 % ) , and TECH ( -5.8 ± 6.6 kg , -6.3 ± 7.1 % ) ( P < 0.001 ) . Self-report physical activity increased significantly in SBWL ( 473.9 ± 800.7 kcal/week ) , SBWL+TECH ( 713.9 ± 1,278.8 kcal/week ) , and TECH ( 1,066.2 ± 1,371 kcal/week ) ( P < 0.001 ) , with no differences between groups ( P = 0.25 ) . The TECH used in conjunction with monthly telephone calls , produced similar , if not greater weight losses and changes in physical activity than the st and ard in-person behavioral program at 6 months . The use of this technology may provide an effective short-term clinical alternative to st and ard in-person behavioral weight loss interventions , with the longer term effects warranting investigation
Conclusion These studies provide preliminary evidence suggesting that EAMS can increase physical activity and decrease weight significantly , but their efficacy compared to other interventions has not yet been demonstrated .
Background Obesity is a growing global health concern that may lead to cardiovascular disease , type II diabetes , and cancer .
Several systematic review s have shown that technology is successful in combating obesity through increased physical activity , but there is no known review on interventions that use an electronic activity monitor system ( EAMS ) .
EAMSs are defined as a wearable device that objective ly measures lifestyle physical activity and can provide feedback , beyond the display of basic activity count information , via the monitor display or through a partnering application to elicit continual self-monitoring of activity behavior .
These devices improve upon st and ard pedometers because they have the ability to provide visual feedback on activity progression , verbal encouragement , and social comparison .
This systematic review aim ed to synthesize the efficacy and feasibility results of EAMSs within published physical activity interventions .