Results indicated that some PFTs may have some prognostic utility , i.e. a trend for more clinical events to be associated with groups classified as ' aspirin resistant ' .
Study -level effect sizes were generally small and absolute outcome risk was not substantially different between ' aspirin resistant ' and ' aspirin sensitive ' design ations .
Based on assumptions of PFTs being able to accurately identify patients at high risk of clinical events and such patients benefiting from treatment modification , the economic model found that a test-treat strategy was likely to be cost-effective .
However , neither assumption is currently evidence based .
BACKGROUND The use of aspirin is well established for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease .
However , a proportion of patients suffer repeat cardiovascular events despite being prescribed aspirin treatment .
It is uncertain whether or not this is due to an inherent inability of aspirin to sufficiently modify platelet activity .
This report aims to investigate whether or not insufficient platelet function inhibition by aspirin ( ' aspirin resistance ' ) , as defined using platelet function tests ( PFTs ) , is linked to the occurrence of adverse clinical outcomes , and further , whether or not patients at risk of future adverse clinical events can be identified through PFTs .
OBJECTIVES To review systematic ally the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness evidence regarding the association between PFT design ation of ' aspirin resistance ' and the risk of adverse clinical outcome ( s ) in patients prescribed aspirin therapy .
To undertake exploratory model-based cost-effectiveness analysis on the use of PFTs .
Clinical relevance of aspirin resistance in patients with stable coronary artery disease: a prospective follow-up study (PROSPECTAR)
Aspirin resistance may increase the risk of major adverse cardiac events ( MACE ) more than threefold in patients with stable coronary artery disease ( CAD ) . This study aim ed to determine the prevalence of aspirin resistance in patients with stable CAD , the role of aspirin resistance on outcome in the follow-up , and the effect of clopidogrel therapy in MACE prevention in aspirin-resistant individuals . We detected the prevalence of aspirin resistance in 234 patients with stable CAD . Platelet function was determined by PFA-100 with collagen and /or epinephrine and collagen and /or ADP cartridges . The mean follow-up time was 20.6 ± 6.9 months . The primary endpoints of the study were occurrence of myocardial infa rct ion , unstable angina , stroke and cardiac death . Of patients , 22.2 % ( n = 52 ) were aspirin resistant by PFA-100 . During follow-up , MACE occurred in eight patients ( 15.4 % ) with aspirin resistance and in 20 patients ( 11.0 % ) with aspirin-sensitive platelet aggregation ( P = 0.269 ) . MACE increased in aspirin-resistant patients after termination of clopidogrel therapy . Eleven patients experienced MACE after cessation of clopidogrel therapy ( P < 0.001 ) . The MACE risk in patients with stable CAD having detected aspirin resistance was similar compared with patients having aspirin-sensitive platelet aggregation by PFA-100 . The MACE prevalence increased during follow-up , however , just after cessation of clopidogrel therapy
Results indicated that some PFTs may have some prognostic utility , i.e. a trend for more clinical events to be associated with groups classified as ' aspirin resistant ' .
Study -level effect sizes were generally small and absolute outcome risk was not substantially different between ' aspirin resistant ' and ' aspirin sensitive ' design ations .
Based on assumptions of PFTs being able to accurately identify patients at high risk of clinical events and such patients benefiting from treatment modification , the economic model found that a test-treat strategy was likely to be cost-effective .
However , neither assumption is currently evidence based .
BACKGROUND The use of aspirin is well established for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease .
However , a proportion of patients suffer repeat cardiovascular events despite being prescribed aspirin treatment .
It is uncertain whether or not this is due to an inherent inability of aspirin to sufficiently modify platelet activity .
This report aims to investigate whether or not insufficient platelet function inhibition by aspirin ( ' aspirin resistance ' ) , as defined using platelet function tests ( PFTs ) , is linked to the occurrence of adverse clinical outcomes , and further , whether or not patients at risk of future adverse clinical events can be identified through PFTs .
OBJECTIVES To review systematic ally the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness evidence regarding the association between PFT design ation of ' aspirin resistance ' and the risk of adverse clinical outcome ( s ) in patients prescribed aspirin therapy .
To undertake exploratory model-based cost-effectiveness analysis on the use of PFTs .