Complications of interproximal enamel reduction are hypersensitivity , irreversible damage of dental pulp , increased formation of plaque , the risk of caries in the stripped enamel areas and periodontal diseases .
CONCLUSION Interproximal enamel reduction is an important part of orthodontic treatment for gaining space in the dental arch , and for the correction of the Bolton index discrepancy
OBJECTIVE Interproximal enamel reduction is a part of orthodontic treatment for gaining a modest amount of space in the treatment of crowding .
Today interproximal enamel reduction has become a viable alternative to the extraction of permanent teeth , and helps to adjust the Bolton Index discrepancy .
The aim of the study is to evaluate various interproximal enamel reduction techniques , its indications , contraindications and complications presented in recent scientific studies .
Influence of attachments and interproximal reduction on the accuracy of canine rotation with Invisalign. A prospective clinical study.
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the influence of attachments and interproximal reduction on canines undergoing rotational movement with Invisalign . MATERIAL S AND METHODS In this prospect i ve clinical study , 53 canines ( 33 maxillary and 20 m and ibular ) were measured from the virtual TREAT models of 31 participants treated with anterior Invisalign .  The pretreatment virtual model of the predicted final tooth position was superimposed on the posttreatment virtual model using ToothMeasure , Invisalign 's proprietary measurement software . A one-way analysis of variance ( ANOVA ) ( P < .05 ) compared three treatment modalities : attachments only ( AO ) , interproximal reduction only ( IO ) , and neither attachments nor interproximal reduction ( N ) . Student 's t-tests ( P < .05 ) compared the mean accuracy of canine rotation between arches . RESULTS The mean accuracy of canine rotation with Invisalign was 35.8 % ( SD = 26.3 ) . Statistical analyses indicated that there was no significant difference in accuracy between groups AO , IO , and N ( P = .343 ) . There was no statistically significant difference ( P = .888 ) in rotational accuracy for maxillary and m and ibular canines for any of the treatment groups . The most commonly prescribed attachment shape was the vertical-ellipsoid ( 70.5 % ) . CONCLUSIONS Vertical-ellipsoid attachments and interproximal reduction do not significantly improve the accuracy of canine rotation with the Invisalign system
Complications of interproximal enamel reduction are hypersensitivity , irreversible damage of dental pulp , increased formation of plaque , the risk of caries in the stripped enamel areas and periodontal diseases .
CONCLUSION Interproximal enamel reduction is an important part of orthodontic treatment for gaining space in the dental arch , and for the correction of the Bolton index discrepancy
OBJECTIVE Interproximal enamel reduction is a part of orthodontic treatment for gaining a modest amount of space in the treatment of crowding .
Today interproximal enamel reduction has become a viable alternative to the extraction of permanent teeth , and helps to adjust the Bolton Index discrepancy .
The aim of the study is to evaluate various interproximal enamel reduction techniques , its indications , contraindications and complications presented in recent scientific studies .