A PVI-only strategy in PeAF patients with a low prevalence of structural heart disease using contemporary technology yields excellent outcomes comparable to those for paroxysmal AF ablation
BACKGROUND Early studies demonstrated relatively low success rates for pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) alone in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation ( PeAF ) .
However , the advent of new technologies and the observation that additional substrate ablation does not improve outcomes have created a new focus on PVI alone for treatment of PeAF .
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to systematic ally review the recent medical literature to determine current medium-term outcomes when a PVI-only approach is used for PeAF .
Substrate modification combined with pulmonary vein isolation improves outcome of catheter ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation: a prospective randomized comparison.
AIMS To investigate the effectiveness of additional substrate modification ( SM ) by left atrial ( LA ) linear lesions as compared with pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) alone in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation ( AF ) in a prospect i ve r and omized study . Percutaneous PVI has evolved as an accepted treatment for paroxysmal AF but seemed to be less effective in patients with persistent AF . The benefit of PVI alone and additional linear lesions has not been vali date d in a r and omized study so far . METHODS AND RESULTS Sixty-two patients with persistent AF ( median duration 7 , range 1 - 18 months ) were r and omly assigned to either PVI alone ( n = 30 ) or additional SM ( n = 32 ) consisting of a roof line connecting both left superior and right superior PV and LA isthmus ablation between left inferior PV and mitral annulus . Procedures including SM were performed using a three-dimensional mapping system ( EnSite NavX , St Jude Medical , St Paul , MN , USA ) . Anti-arrhythmic drugs were discontinued within 8 weeks after ablation in both groups . Follow-up included daily trans-telephonic ECG transmitted irrespective of the patient 's symptoms . PVI was successful in 98 % of all targeted veins in both groups . Additional SM did not increase fluoroscopy time ( 72.1+/-18.7 vs. 72.9+/-17.3 min , P=0.92 ) because of the use of three-dimensional navigation in the PVI+SM group . AF recurrences within the first 4 weeks following ablation were more common after PVI alone ( 77 % ) than additional SM ( 44 % , P=0.002 ) . After a follow-up time of 487 ( 429 - 570 ) days , only 20 % of patients undergoing st and alone PVI  remained in sinus rhythm when compared with 69 % following PVI combined with SM ( P=0.0001 ) . Two patients assigned to PVI+SM experienced procedure-related complications ( cardiac tamponade and minor stroke ) which resolved without sequelae . CONCLUSION PVI alone is insufficient in the treatment of persistent AF . However , additional left linear lesions increase the success rate significantly . Early AF-relapses are associated with a negative outcome after PVI alone but not following additional SM
A PVI-only strategy in PeAF patients with a low prevalence of structural heart disease using contemporary technology yields excellent outcomes comparable to those for paroxysmal AF ablation
BACKGROUND Early studies demonstrated relatively low success rates for pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) alone in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation ( PeAF ) .
However , the advent of new technologies and the observation that additional substrate ablation does not improve outcomes have created a new focus on PVI alone for treatment of PeAF .
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to systematic ally review the recent medical literature to determine current medium-term outcomes when a PVI-only approach is used for PeAF .