RECENT FINDINGS Several r and omized control trials and systematic review s demonstrate the safety and efficacy of atrial fibrillation ablation in patients with heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction .
In multiple trials , these patients have shown clinical benefit from atrial fibrillation ablation including improved left ventricular systolic function , quality of life , and clinical heart failure symptoms .
SUMMARY Atrial fibrillation ablation in heart failure patients remains well tolerated with an overall efficacy comparable to atrial fibrillation ablation in patients without heart failure .
There is consistent evidence for the clinical benefit of atrial fibrillation ablation in heart failure patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction and limited evidence for atrial fibrillation ablation in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction .
Currently , there is insufficient data regarding the safety and efficacy of left atrial appendage closure devices in heart failure patients
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure experience an increased morbidity and mortality from the hemodynamic consequences of atrial fibrillation and an increased stroke risk .
Consequently , there has been increased attention to procedural alternatives to pharmacologic rhythm control and anticoagulation for stroke prevention .
This review aims to evaluate the evidence for atrial fibrillation ablation and left atrial appendage closure in heart failure patients .
Hemodynamic effects of an irregular sequence of ventricular cycle lengths during atrial fibrillation.
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to determine the independent hemodynamic effects of an irregular sequence of ventricular cycle lengths in patients with atrial fibrillation ( AF ) . BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation may reduce cardiac output by several possible mechanisms , including loss of the atrial contribution to left ventricular filling , valvular regurgitation , increased ventricular rate or irregular RR intervals . This study was design ed to evaluate the effects of an irregular RR interval , independent of the average ventricular rate , on cardiac hemodynamic data during AF . METHODS Sixteen patients with AF were studied invasively . During intrinsically conducted AF ( mean rate 102 + /- 22 beats/ min ) , the right ventricular apex electrogram was recorded onto frequency-modulated ( FM ) tape . After atrioventricular node ablation , the right ventricular apex was stimulated in three pacing modes in r and omized sequence : 1 ) VVI at 60 beats/min ; 2 ) VVI at the same average rate as during intrinsically conducted AF ( 102 + /- 22 beats/min ) ; and 3 ) during VVT pacing in which the pacemaker was triggered by playback of the FM tape recording of the right ventricular apex electrogram previously recorded during intrinsically conducted AF ( VVT 102 + /- 22 beats/min ) . RESULTS Compared with VVI pacing at the same average rate , an irregular sequence of RR intervals decreased cardiac output ( 4.4 + /- 1.6 vs. 5.2 + /- 2.4 liters/min , p < 0.01 ) , increased pulmonary capillary wedge pressure ( 17 + /- 7 vs. 14 + /- 6 mm Hg , p < 0.002 ) and increased right atrial pressure ( 10 + /- 6 vs. 8 + /- 4 mm Hg , p < 0.05 ) . CONCLUSIONS An irregular sequence of RR intervals produces adverse hemodynamic consequences that are independent of heart rate
RECENT FINDINGS Several r and omized control trials and systematic review s demonstrate the safety and efficacy of atrial fibrillation ablation in patients with heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction .
In multiple trials , these patients have shown clinical benefit from atrial fibrillation ablation including improved left ventricular systolic function , quality of life , and clinical heart failure symptoms .
SUMMARY Atrial fibrillation ablation in heart failure patients remains well tolerated with an overall efficacy comparable to atrial fibrillation ablation in patients without heart failure .
There is consistent evidence for the clinical benefit of atrial fibrillation ablation in heart failure patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction and limited evidence for atrial fibrillation ablation in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction .
Currently , there is insufficient data regarding the safety and efficacy of left atrial appendage closure devices in heart failure patients
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure experience an increased morbidity and mortality from the hemodynamic consequences of atrial fibrillation and an increased stroke risk .
Consequently , there has been increased attention to procedural alternatives to pharmacologic rhythm control and anticoagulation for stroke prevention .
This review aims to evaluate the evidence for atrial fibrillation ablation and left atrial appendage closure in heart failure patients .