Conclusions Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation is effective at reducing important clinical outcomes in patients with coronary heart disease .
While our analysis was constrained by the quality of included trials and missing information about intervention components , there appears to be little differential effect of variations in exercise intervention , particularly on mortality outcomes .
Background While the clinical benefits of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation are well established , there is extensive variation in the interventions used within these trials .
It is unknown whether variations in individual components of these exercise interventions provide different relative contributions to overall clinical outcomes .
This study aims to systematic ally examine the relationship between individual components of the exercise intervention in cardiac rehabilitation ( such as intensity and frequency ) and clinical outcomes for people with coronary heart disease .
Improved Exercise Tolerance and Quality of Life With Cardiac Rehabilitation of Older Patients After Myocardial Infarction: Results of a Randomized, Controlled Trial
Background —Whether cardiac rehabilitation ( CR ) is effective in patients older than 75 years , who have been excluded from most trials , remains unclear . We enrolled patients 46 to 86 years old in a r and omized trial and assessed the effects of 2 months of post-myocardial infa rct ion ( MI ) CR  on total work capacity ( TWC , in kilograms per meter ) and health-related quality of life ( HRQL ) . Methods and Results —Of 773 screened patients , 270 without cardiac failure , dementia , disability , or contraindications to exercise were r and omized to outpatient , hospital-based CR ( Hosp-CR ) , home-based CR ( Home-CR ) , or no CR within 3 predefined age groups ( middle-aged , 45 to 65 years ; old , 66 to 75 years ; and very old , > 75 years ) of 90 patients each .  TWC and HRQL were determined with cycle ergometry and Sickness Impact Profile at baseline , after CR , and 6 and 12 months later . Within each age group , TWC improved with Hosp-CR and Home-CR and was unchanged with no CR . The improvement was similar in middle-aged and old persons but smaller , although still significant , in very old patients . TWC reverted toward baseline by 12 months with Hosp-CR but not with Home-CR .  HRQL improved in middle-aged and old CR and control patients but only with CR in very old patients . Complications were similar across treatment and age groups . Costs were lower for Home-CR than for Hosp-CR . Conclusions —Post-MI Hosp-CR and Home-CR are similarly effective in the short term and improve TWC and HRQL in each age group . However , with lower costs and more prolonged positive effects , Home-CR may be the treatment of choice in low-risk older patients
Conclusions Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation is effective at reducing important clinical outcomes in patients with coronary heart disease .
While our analysis was constrained by the quality of included trials and missing information about intervention components , there appears to be little differential effect of variations in exercise intervention , particularly on mortality outcomes .
Background While the clinical benefits of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation are well established , there is extensive variation in the interventions used within these trials .
It is unknown whether variations in individual components of these exercise interventions provide different relative contributions to overall clinical outcomes .
This study aims to systematic ally examine the relationship between individual components of the exercise intervention in cardiac rehabilitation ( such as intensity and frequency ) and clinical outcomes for people with coronary heart disease .