We found that substantial evidence exists for achieving cost savings and efficiency improvements from task shifting activities related to tuberculosis and HIV/AIDS , and additional evidence exists for the potential to achieve cost savings from activities related to malaria , NCDs , NTDs , childhood illness , and other disease areas , especially at the primary health care and community levels .
Conclusions Task shifting presents a viable option for health system cost savings in LMICs .
Background Task shifting has become an increasingly popular way to increase access to health services , especially in low-re source setting s. Research has demonstrated that task shifting , including the use of community health workers ( CHWs ) to deliver care , can improve population health .
This systematic review investigates whether task shifting in low-income and middle-income countries ( LMICs ) results in efficiency improvements by achieving cost savings .
Economic evaluation of a task-shifting intervention for common mental disorders in India.
OBJECTIVE To carry out an economic evaluation of a task-shifting intervention for the treatment of depressive and anxiety disorders in primary -care setting s in Goa , India . METHODS Cost-utility and cost-effectiveness analyses based on generalized linear models were performed within a trial set in 24 public and private primary -care facilities . Subjects were r and omly assigned to an intervention or a control arm . Eligible subjects in the intervention arm were given psycho-education , case management , interpersonal psychotherapy and /or antidepressants by lay health workers . Subjects in the control arm were treated by physicians . The use of health-care re sources , the disability of each subject and degree of psychiatric morbidity , as measured by the Revised Clinical Interview Schedule , were determined at 2 , 6 and 12 months . FINDINGS Complete data , from all three follow-ups , were collected from 1243 ( 75.4 % ) and 938 ( 81.7 % ) of the subjects enrolled in the study facilities from the public and private sectors , respectively . Within the public facilities , subjects in the intervention arm showed greater improvement in all the health outcomes investigated than those in the control arm . Time costs were also significantly lower in the intervention arm than in the control arm , whereas health system costs in the two arms were similar . Within the private facilities , however , the effectiveness and costs recorded in the two arms were similar . CONCLUSION Within public primary -care facilities in Goa , the use of lay health workers in the care of subjects with common mental disorders was not only cost-effective but also cost-saving
We found that substantial evidence exists for achieving cost savings and efficiency improvements from task shifting activities related to tuberculosis and HIV/AIDS , and additional evidence exists for the potential to achieve cost savings from activities related to malaria , NCDs , NTDs , childhood illness , and other disease areas , especially at the primary health care and community levels .
Conclusions Task shifting presents a viable option for health system cost savings in LMICs .
Background Task shifting has become an increasingly popular way to increase access to health services , especially in low-re source setting s. Research has demonstrated that task shifting , including the use of community health workers ( CHWs ) to deliver care , can improve population health .
This systematic review investigates whether task shifting in low-income and middle-income countries ( LMICs ) results in efficiency improvements by achieving cost savings .