Only the DASH and PRWE have evidence of reliability , validity , and responsiveness in patients with traumatic injuries to the h and and wrist ; other measures either have incomplete evidence or evidence gathered in a nontraumatic population .
Conclusions : The DASH and PRWE both have evidence of reliability , validity , and responsiveness in a h and and wrist trauma population .
Other PROMs used to assess h and and wrist trauma patients do not .
Background : Patient-reported outcome measures ( PROMs ) are important tools for assessing outcomes following injuries to the h and and wrist .
Many commonly used PROMs have no evidence of reliability , validity , and responsiveness in a h and and wrist trauma population .
This systematic review examines the PROMs used in the assessment of h and and wrist trauma patients , and the evidence for reliability , validity , and responsiveness of each measure in this population .
Randomised study of non-bridging external fixation compared with intramedullary fixation of unstable distal radial fractures
Abstract This is a r and omised study to compare two types of osteo synthesis to mobilise wrists after distal fractures of the radius . Inclusion criteria were Older type 2 and 3 fractures .  External fixation was managed with Hoffmann II compact non-bridging . Internal fixation was managed with Micronail . Patients were followed up for 12 weeks . The primary outcome was the results of the disabilities of arm , shoulder and h and ( DASH ) question naire . The secondary outcomes were answers to the patient-rated wrist evaluation ( PRWE ) , grip strength , satisfaction , radial length , and volar tilt .  Thirty patients were r and omised to have external fixation and 31 to have internal fixation .  There were no significant differences in DASH score .  Internal fixation gave significantly better grip strength at five ( p = 0.00 ) and 12 weeks ( p = 0.03 ) . The operating time was significantly shorter ( p = 0.00 ) when non-bridging external fixation was used , and there were minor radiological differences . An activity-based costing analysis showed that external fixation  cost three times more overall
Only the DASH and PRWE have evidence of reliability , validity , and responsiveness in patients with traumatic injuries to the h and and wrist ; other measures either have incomplete evidence or evidence gathered in a nontraumatic population .
Conclusions : The DASH and PRWE both have evidence of reliability , validity , and responsiveness in a h and and wrist trauma population .
Other PROMs used to assess h and and wrist trauma patients do not .
Background : Patient-reported outcome measures ( PROMs ) are important tools for assessing outcomes following injuries to the h and and wrist .
Many commonly used PROMs have no evidence of reliability , validity , and responsiveness in a h and and wrist trauma population .
This systematic review examines the PROMs used in the assessment of h and and wrist trauma patients , and the evidence for reliability , validity , and responsiveness of each measure in this population .