Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
Effectiveness of a 12-month exercise program on physical performance and quality of life of breast cancer survivors.
AIM The study aim ed at determining whether physical exercise training improves the quality of life ( QoL ) and physical fitness of breast cancer survivors . PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 573 breast cancer survivors were r and omized into an exercise or a control group , 12-months after adjuvant treatments . EORTC QLQ-C30 and BR-23 question naires were used for evaluation of QoL , FACIT-F for fatigue and the Finnish modified version of Beck 's 13-item depression scale ( RBDI ) for depression . Physical fitness was assessed by a 2-km walking test , and a figure-8 running test and physical activity ( PA )  by metabolic equivalent ( MET ) hours per week ( MET-h/wk ) . RESULTS Figure-8 running time improved significantly among the patients of the intervention group compared with the controls ( p<0.001 ) . No significant between-group differences were observed in 2-km walking time , in PA , EORTC-QLQ-C30 , BR-23 , FACIT-F or BDI . However , there was a linear relationship between increased PA and improved QoL ( p=0.006 ) , irrespective of the intervention . CONCLUSION Increase in physical activity was associated with improved QoL , but no effect of the exercise intervention was observed
Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?