There is limited evidence to suggest which ablation method was the best .
There is limited evidence to suggest that CA may be a better treatment option compared to medical therapies in the management of persistent AF .
This review was also unable to recommend the best CA method
BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia seen in cardiovascular departments .
Treatments include medical interventions and catheter ablation .
Due to uncertainties in medical therapies for AF , and the need to continue sinus rhythm , ablation has been recently considered as a viable alternative .
Many new ablation methods based on pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) have been developed .
OBJECTIVES The primary objective of this review was to assess the beneficial and harmful effects of  catheter ablation ( CA ) in comparison with medical treatment in patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF .
The secondary objective was to determine the best regimen of CA .
Catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation improves cardiac function: a prospective study on the impact of atrial fibrillation ablation on left ventricular function assessed by magnetic resonance imaging.
AIMS Beneficial effects of atrial fibrillation ( AF ) ablation have been demonstrated in patients with congestive heart failure ( CHF ) and significantly impaired left ventricular ejection fraction ( LVEF ) . However , the impact of pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) on cardiac function in patients with paroxysmal AF and impaired LVEF remains under discussion . This study aim ed to evaluate the impact of PVI for paroxysmal AF on cardiac function in patients with impaired LVEF using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging ( CMRI ) . METHODS AND RESULTS A total number of 70 patients with paroxysmal AF and episodes < or = 24 h were  scanned on a 1.5-T-CMRI before and 6 months after PVI during sinus rhythm . End-diastolic volume , end-systolic volume , and LVEF were determined by epicardial and endocardial measurements . Patients were categorized into two groups regarding cardiac function as assessed by CMRI : group 1 patients ( n = 18 ) with an LVEF < 50 % and patients with an LVEF > 50 % ( group 2 , n = 52 ) . Group 1 patients demonstrated a significant lower success rate than patients of group 2 after a follow-up of 152 + /- 40 days ( 50 vs. 73 % , P < 0.05 ) . Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in group 1 patients demonstrated a significant improvement in cardiac function after AF ablation ( 41 + /- 6 vs. 51 + /- 12 % , P = 0.004 ) , whereas group 2 patients did not show significant differences ( 60 + /- 6 vs. 59 + /- 9 % , P = 0.22 ) after a 6 months follow-up . CONCLUSION Pulmonary vein isolation improves cardiac function in patients with paroxysmal AF and impaired LVEF . These data suggest that an impaired LV function can be partially attributed to AF with short-lasting paroxysms
There is limited evidence to suggest which ablation method was the best .
There is limited evidence to suggest that CA may be a better treatment option compared to medical therapies in the management of persistent AF .
This review was also unable to recommend the best CA method
BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia seen in cardiovascular departments .
Treatments include medical interventions and catheter ablation .
Due to uncertainties in medical therapies for AF , and the need to continue sinus rhythm , ablation has been recently considered as a viable alternative .
Many new ablation methods based on pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) have been developed .
OBJECTIVES The primary objective of this review was to assess the beneficial and harmful effects of  catheter ablation ( CA ) in comparison with medical treatment in patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF .
The secondary objective was to determine the best regimen of CA .