Sensitivity analysis indicates that from both perspectives the service is very cost effective and may be cost saving .
CONCLUSIONS These results make alcohol screening and counseling one of the highest-ranking preventive services among the 25 effective services evaluated using st and ardized methods .
BACKGROUND The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force ( USPSTF ) has recommended screening and behavioral counseling interventions in primary care to reduce alcohol misuse .
This study was design ed to develop a st and ardized rating for the clinical ly preventable burden and cost effectiveness of complying with that recommendation that would allow comparisons across many recommended services .
Reducing alcohol consumption. Comparing three brief methods in family practice.
OBJECTIVE To compare the effects of three brief methods of reducing alcohol consumption among family practice patients . DESIGN Patients r and omly assigned to one of three interventions were assessed initially and at 3- , 6- , and 12-month follow-up appointments . SETTING Family practice clinic composed of 12 primary care physicians seeing approximately 6000 adults monthly in a small urban community , population 40,000 . PARTICIPANTS Through a screening question naire , 134 men and 131 women were identified as hazardous drinkers ( five or more drinks at least once monthly ) during an 11-month screening of 1420 patients . Of 265 patients approached , 180 agreed to participate and 159 ( 83 men and 76 women ) actually participated in the study . INTERVENTIONS Three interventions were studied : brief physician advice ( 5 minutes ) , two 30-minute sessions with a physician using cognitive behavioural strategies or two 30-minute sessions with a nurse practitioner using identical strategies . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Quantity and frequency ( QF ) of drinking were used to assess reduction in hazardous drinking and problems related to drinking over 12 months of follow up . RESULTS No statistical difference between groups was found . The QF of monthly drinking was reduced overall by 66 % ( among men ) and 74 % ( among women ) for those reporting at least one hazardous drinking day weekly at assessment ( N = 96 ) . Men reported drinking significantly more than women . CONCLUSIONS These results indicated that offering brief , specific advice can motivate patients to reduce their alcohol intake . There was no difference in effect between brief advice from their own physician or brief intervention by a physician or a nurse
Sensitivity analysis indicates that from both perspectives the service is very cost effective and may be cost saving .
CONCLUSIONS These results make alcohol screening and counseling one of the highest-ranking preventive services among the 25 effective services evaluated using st and ardized methods .
BACKGROUND The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force ( USPSTF ) has recommended screening and behavioral counseling interventions in primary care to reduce alcohol misuse .
This study was design ed to develop a st and ardized rating for the clinical ly preventable burden and cost effectiveness of complying with that recommendation that would allow comparisons across many recommended services .