Preliminary work from this review suggests that exercise intervention compared with usual care both pre and post-surgery is associated with improved cardiopulmonary exercise capacity , increased muscle strength and reduced fatigue , post-operative complications and hospital length of stay .
BACKGROUND Surgery remains the best curative option for appropriately selected patients with lung cancer .
Evidence suggests that improving cardiovascular fitness and functional capacity can accelerate post-surgery recovery and reduce mortality .
However , the effect of exercise intervention for patients surgically treated for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer [ NCSLC ] has not been fully examined .
PURPOSE This review examines the literature regarding exercise intervention for patients who are surgically treated for NSCLC focussing on three key areas : method ological quality , intervention design ( e.g. duration , frequency , type ) and outcomes measured .
The minimal important difference of exercise tests in severe COPD
Our aim was to determine the minimal important difference ( MID ) for 6-min walk distance ( 6MWD ) and maximal cycle exercise capacity ( MCEC ) in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ( COPD ) . 1,218 patients enrolled in the National Emphysema Treatment Trial completed exercise tests before and after 4–6 weeks of pre-trial rehabilitation  , and 6 months after r and omisation to surgery or medical care .  The St George 's Respiratory Question naire ( domain and total scores ) and University of California San Diego Shortness  of Breath Question naire ( total score ) served as anchors for anchor-based MID estimates . In order to calculate distribution-based estimates , we used the st and ard error of measurement , Cohen 's effect size and the empirical rule effect size . Anchor-based estimates for the 6MWD were 18.9 m ( 95 % CI 18.1–20.1 m ) , 24.2 m ( 95 % CI 23.4–25.4 m ) , 24.6 m ( 95 % CI 23.4–25.7 m ) and 26.4 m ( 95 % CI 25.4–27.4 m ) , which were similar to distribution-based MID estimates of 25.7 , 26.8 and 30.6 m. For MCEC , anchor-based estimates for the MID were 2.2 W ( 95 % CI 2.0–2.4 W ) , 3.2 W ( 95 % CI 3.0–3.4 W ) , 3.2 W ( 95 % CI 3.0–3.4 W ) and 3.3 W ( 95 % CI 3.0–3.5 W ) , while distribution-based estimates were 5.3 and 5.5 W. We suggest a MID of 26±2 m for 6MWD and 4±1 W for MCEC for patients with severe COPD
Preliminary work from this review suggests that exercise intervention compared with usual care both pre and post-surgery is associated with improved cardiopulmonary exercise capacity , increased muscle strength and reduced fatigue , post-operative complications and hospital length of stay .
BACKGROUND Surgery remains the best curative option for appropriately selected patients with lung cancer .
Evidence suggests that improving cardiovascular fitness and functional capacity can accelerate post-surgery recovery and reduce mortality .
However , the effect of exercise intervention for patients surgically treated for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer [ NCSLC ] has not been fully examined .
PURPOSE This review examines the literature regarding exercise intervention for patients who are surgically treated for NSCLC focussing on three key areas : method ological quality , intervention design ( e.g. duration , frequency , type ) and outcomes measured .