Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
Motivational Interviewing to Increase Physical Activity in Long-Term Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Background : Physical activity can confer many benefits on cancer survivors , including relief of persistent symptoms related to cancer treatment . Objectives : To evaluate the effect of a motivational interviewing ( MI ) intervention on increasing physical activity ( Community Healthy Activities Model Program for Seniors question naire ) and improving aerobic fitness ( 6-minute walk ) , health ( Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 ) , and fatigue ( Schwartz Cancer Fatigue Scale ) in cancer survivors . A secondary purpose was to evaluate whether the effect of MI on physical activities depended on self-efficacy . Methods : Fifty-six physically inactive adult cancer survivors ( mean = 42 months since completion of treatment ) were assigned r and omly to intervention and control groups . The MI intervention consisted of one in-person counseling session followed by two MI telephone calls over 6 months . Control group participants received two telephone calls without MI content . Outcomes were measured at baseline , 3 months , and 6 months , and were analyzed using multilevel modeling . Results : The results of the MI intervention explained significant group differences in regular physical activities ( measured in caloric expenditure per week ) , controlling for time since completion of cancer treatment ( p < .05 ) . Aerobic fitness , physical and mental health , and fatigue were not different between groups . In the intervention group , individuals with high self-efficacy for exercise at baseline increased their physical activity more than those with low self-efficacy ( p < .05 ) . In the control group , increases in physical activity did not depend on self-efficacy . Discussion : Use of MI may increase physical activity in long-term cancer survivors , especially in persons with high self-efficacy for exercise . Multilevel modeling analysis revealed individual changes that would not have been shown by analysis of group means . Future studies with larger sample s or more intense MI interventions may show changes in aerobic fitness , physical and mental health , and fatigue
Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?