Only the DASH and PRWE have evidence of reliability , validity , and responsiveness in patients with traumatic injuries to the h and and wrist ; other measures either have incomplete evidence or evidence gathered in a nontraumatic population .
Conclusions : The DASH and PRWE both have evidence of reliability , validity , and responsiveness in a h and and wrist trauma population .
Other PROMs used to assess h and and wrist trauma patients do not .
Background : Patient-reported outcome measures ( PROMs ) are important tools for assessing outcomes following injuries to the h and and wrist .
Many commonly used PROMs have no evidence of reliability , validity , and responsiveness in a h and and wrist trauma population .
This systematic review examines the PROMs used in the assessment of h and and wrist trauma patients , and the evidence for reliability , validity , and responsiveness of each measure in this population .
Bridging external fixation and supplementary Kirschner-wire fixation versus volar locked plating for unstable fractures of the distal radius: a randomised, prospective trial.
We performed a prospect i ve , r and omised trial to evaluate the outcome after surgery of displaced , unstable fractures of the distal radius . A total of 280 consecutive patients were enrolled in a prospect i ve data base and 88 identified who met the inclusion criteria for surgery . They were r and omised to receive either bridging external fixation with supplementary Kirschner-wire fixation or volar-locked plating with screws . Both groups were similar in terms of age , gender , h and dominance , fracture pattern , socio-economic status and medical co-morbidities . Although the patients treated by volar plating had a statistically significant early improvement in the range of movement of the wrist , this advantage diminished with time and in absolute terms the difference in range of movement was clinical ly unimportant . Radiologically , there were no clinical ly significant differences in the reductions , although more patients with AO/OTA ( Orthopaedic Trauma Association ) type C fractures were allocated to the external fixation group . The function at one year was similar in the two groups . No clear advantage could be demonstrated with either treatment but fewer re-operations were required in the external fixation group
Only the DASH and PRWE have evidence of reliability , validity , and responsiveness in patients with traumatic injuries to the h and and wrist ; other measures either have incomplete evidence or evidence gathered in a nontraumatic population .
Conclusions : The DASH and PRWE both have evidence of reliability , validity , and responsiveness in a h and and wrist trauma population .
Other PROMs used to assess h and and wrist trauma patients do not .
Background : Patient-reported outcome measures ( PROMs ) are important tools for assessing outcomes following injuries to the h and and wrist .
Many commonly used PROMs have no evidence of reliability , validity , and responsiveness in a h and and wrist trauma population .
This systematic review examines the PROMs used in the assessment of h and and wrist trauma patients , and the evidence for reliability , validity , and responsiveness of each measure in this population .