Conclusion It seems that the use of flowable composite as a fissure sealing material can slightly increase the retention rate of sealants compared with conventional resin-based sealants
Objectives The aim of this systematic review and meta- analysis was to evaluate fissure sealant retention in clinical studies in which investigators used flowable composites as pit and fissure sealants compared with conventional resin-based pit and fissure sealants .
Clinical comparison of a flowable composite and fissure sealant: a 24-month split-mouth, randomized, and controlled study.
OBJECTIVES The aim of this clinical study was to evaluate the retention rate and caries-prevention effect of a flowable composite compared to a conventional resin-based sealant in a young population over a 24-month period . METHODS Thirty-four patients , ranging in age from 16 to 22 years , diagnosed with at least 2 non-cavitated pit- and -fissure caries in the first and second molars were selected for this r and omized split-mouth design trial . A total of 220 sealants , were placed in 117 upper molars and 103 lower molars . The teeth were sealed with a flowable resin composite ( Tetric Evo Flow ) or a sealant material ( Helioseal F ) . Each restoration was independently evaluated in terms of retention and the presence of caries at baseline and at 1 , 6 , 12 , and 24 months . Data were analyzed using non-parametric Mann-Whitney U and Friedman 1-way ANOVA tests at p<0.05 . RESULTS Tetric Evo Flow showed complete retention with 100 % , 95.5 % , 93.8 % , and 88.5 % at 1 , 6 , 12 , and 24-month evaluations , respectively , while Helioseal F retention rates were 98.1 % , 95.5 % , 94.8 % , and 85.4 % , respectively , for the same evaluation periods . At the 24-month recall , 4 ( 4.2 % ) total losses were observed in subjects treated with Tetric Evo Flow and 2 total losses ( 2.1 % ) for Helioseal F , respectively . No significant differences were observed between the material s in retention rates or caries incidence for each evaluation period ( p>0.05 ) . CONCLUSION Placement of flowable composite as fissure sealants in the younger population seems to be as effective as conventional fluoride containing fissure sealants for the prevention of fissure caries . CLINICAL RELEVANCE The use of a flowable composite as a fissure sealant material , in conjunction with a total-etch , single bottle adhesive , yielded better retention than did the conventional fluoride containing resin-based fissure sealant over a 24-month period in young patients
Conclusion It seems that the use of flowable composite as a fissure sealing material can slightly increase the retention rate of sealants compared with conventional resin-based sealants
Objectives The aim of this systematic review and meta- analysis was to evaluate fissure sealant retention in clinical studies in which investigators used flowable composites as pit and fissure sealants compared with conventional resin-based pit and fissure sealants .