Nurses only and multidisciplinary teams were the most frequent professionals to provide education , and most educational interventions were delivered postdischarge .
Psychoeducational interventions were generally effective at reducing smoking and admissions for patients with ACS .
Culturally appropriate health education , self-management educational interventions , group medical visits and psychoeducational interventions were generally effective for patients with T2DM .
Results indicate that there is a body of current evidence about the efficacy of health education , its content and delivery methods for patients with ACS or T2DM .
OBJECTIVES This umbrella review aim ed to identify the current evidence on health education-related interventions for patients with acute coronary syndrome ( ACS ) or type two diabetes mellitus ( T2DM ) ; identify the educational content , delivery methods , intensity , duration and setting required .
The purpose was to provide recommendations for educational interventions for high-risk patients with both ACS and T2DM .
The effectiveness of group medical visits on diabetes mellitus type 2 (dm2) specific outcomes in adults: a systematic review
Background The prevalence of diabetes mellitus is ubiquitous . Complications and costs of diabetes are rising and are depleting limited re sources . It is imperative for healthcare professionals and patients alike to confront this chronic condition by exploring new interventions . An innovative health care delivery model has emerged in the last 25 years in the form of the group medical visit . Group medical visits can range from of six to twenty patients scheduled together with time allotted for individual care as well as in the group setting . Objectives The review objective was to conduct a systematic review and meta‐ analysis to synthesize the best available evidence related to effectiveness of group medical visits on HbA1c , blood pressure and cholesterol measurements /levels for adult patients with type II diabetes in outpatient setting s. Search strategy A three‐step literature search for studies in English language from 1990 to 2010 was conducted utilising ( a ) a primary search of Medline , CINAHL , PsycINFO and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials , ( b ) a secondary search of non‐indexed data bases , and ( c ) a search of the grey literature . In addition , a manual review of the reference lists of all identified reports and articles was performed to identify additional studies . Inclusion criteria All r and omised and quasi‐experimental studies of adult patients ( > 18 ) with type II diabetes mellitus seen in outpatient health setting s were considered if they met one or more of the following diagnostic outcome measurements : haemoglobin A1c , systolic and diastolic blood pressure , and low density lipoprotein cholesterol . Critical appraisal , data collection and analysis Each of the eligible articles was review ed by two independent review ers . Disagreements between the review ers were resolved through discussion , or with a third review er . Studies that met the inclusion criteria were assessed for method ological quality using the JBI st and ardized critical appraisal tools . Data extraction was undertaken using the st and ardised data extraction tool from JBI‐MAStARI . Main results The search strategy identified 2,040 articles in the published and unpublished literature . Of these , 11 r and omised controlled trials and 4 quasi‐experimental trials met the inclusion criteria and represented 2240 patients included in the final review . There are clear benefits of group medical visits for patients ' HbA1c levels which are consistent in the post‐intervention and change from baseline effect sizes . The most significant effect observed is with the change from baseline results . Some evidence suggests post‐intervention and change from baseline systolic blood pressure improvement at the nine to twelve month interval and change from baseline improvement at the 4 year timeframe . There is no evidence that group visits improve LDL cholesterol values of the group visit participants . Conclusions Group medical visits should be considered by clinicians as an effective non‐pharmacologic intervention that can have a positive impact on biologic markers such as haemoglobin A1c and systolic blood pressure . Implication s for practice The evidence suggests that the most powerful model of Group medical visits ( GMV ) is when a clinician prescriber is present during or immediately after GMV sessions for medication reconciliation or individual patient needs . Implication s for research Future research should include this GMV intervention in r and omised controlled trials across different health systems and socio‐economic and ethnic groups
Nurses only and multidisciplinary teams were the most frequent professionals to provide education , and most educational interventions were delivered postdischarge .
Psychoeducational interventions were generally effective at reducing smoking and admissions for patients with ACS .
Culturally appropriate health education , self-management educational interventions , group medical visits and psychoeducational interventions were generally effective for patients with T2DM .
Results indicate that there is a body of current evidence about the efficacy of health education , its content and delivery methods for patients with ACS or T2DM .
OBJECTIVES This umbrella review aim ed to identify the current evidence on health education-related interventions for patients with acute coronary syndrome ( ACS ) or type two diabetes mellitus ( T2DM ) ; identify the educational content , delivery methods , intensity , duration and setting required .
The purpose was to provide recommendations for educational interventions for high-risk patients with both ACS and T2DM .