Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
Exercise and quality of life during and after treatment for breast cancer: results of two randomized controlled trials.
OBJECTIVE To determine the effect of exercise on quality of life in ( a ) a r and omized controlled trial of exercise among recently diagnosed breast cancer survivors undergoing adjuvant therapy and ( b ) a similar trial among post-treatment survivors . METHODS Fifty newly diagnosed breast cancer survivors were recruited through a hospital-based tumor registry and r and omized to a 6-month , home-based exercise program ( n=25 ) or a usual care group ( n=25 ) . In a separate trial , 75 post-treatment survivors were r and omized to a 6-month , supervised exercise intervention ( n=37 ) or to usual care ( n=38 ) . Participants in both studies completed measures of happiness , depressive symptoms , anxiety , stress , self-esteem , and quality of life at baseline and 6 months . RESULTS Forty-five participants completed the trial for newly diagnosed survivors and 67 completed the trial for post-treatment survivors . Good adherence was observed in both studies . Baseline quality of life was similar for both studies on most measures . Exercise was not associated with quality of life benefits in the full sample of either study ; however exercise was associated with improved social functioning among post-treatment survivors who reported low social functioning at baseline ( p<0.05 ) . CONCLUSIONS Exercise did not affect quality of life in either recently diagnosed or post-treatment breast cancer survivors ; however this may be due in part to relatively high baseline functioning among participants in both studies . Strategies for future research include limiting enrollment to survivors who report reduced quality of life on screening question naires and targeting survivor subgroups known to be at particular risk for quality of life impairment
Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?