The cost of intervention per participant delivered by dietitians was lower than interventions delivered by non-dietitians , although few studies reported costs .
Lifestyle interventions are effective in reducing body weight and glucose-related outcomes .
Dietitian-delivered interventions , compared with those delivered by other personnel , achieved greater weight reduction .
No consistent trend was identified across different delivery channels
BACKGROUND Type 2 diabetes is a significant public health concern .
With the completion of the Diabetes Prevention Program , there has been a proliferation of studies attempting to translate this evidence base into practice .
However , the cost , effectiveness , and cost-effectiveness of these adapted interventions is unknown .
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this systematic review was to conduct a comprehensive meta- analysis to synthesize the effectiveness , cost , and cost-effectiveness of lifestyle diabetes prevention interventions and compare effects by intervention delivery agent ( dietitian vs non-dietitian ) and channel ( in-person vs technology-delivered ) .
Reach and Effectiveness of a Weight Loss Intervention in Patients With Prediabetes in Colorado
Introduction Although lifestyle interventions are effective in delaying the onset of diabetes , translating these lessons to routine health care setting s remains a challenge . We investigated the effectiveness of a theory-based , brief , small-group weight loss intervention for diabetes prevention . A secondary purpose was to determine the potential reach of the intervention . Methods A total of 14,379 members of an integrated health care organization newly diagnosed with prediabetes were potentially eligible to participate in this matched cohort longitudinal study . Of this group , 1,030 attended a 90-minute , small-group session that targeted personal action planning for healthful eating , physical activity , and weight management . We accessed electronic medical records to select 1 to 2 controls ( matched on impaired fasting glucose measurement , sex , age , and body mass index ) for each member who attended the small-group session ( n = 760 ) . Weight change , as recorded in the medical record , was the primary outcome . Mixed models analyses were used to adjust for matching variables and covariates and to account for individual r and om effects over time . Results Small-group participants  lost significantly more weight than did their matched controls . A significantly higher proportion of small-group participants  lost at least 5 % of their body weight compared with controls . Conclusion A brief , small-group weight loss intervention was effective . However , it did not reach broadly into the population that was at risk for diabetes
The cost of intervention per participant delivered by dietitians was lower than interventions delivered by non-dietitians , although few studies reported costs .
Lifestyle interventions are effective in reducing body weight and glucose-related outcomes .
Dietitian-delivered interventions , compared with those delivered by other personnel , achieved greater weight reduction .
No consistent trend was identified across different delivery channels
BACKGROUND Type 2 diabetes is a significant public health concern .
With the completion of the Diabetes Prevention Program , there has been a proliferation of studies attempting to translate this evidence base into practice .
However , the cost , effectiveness , and cost-effectiveness of these adapted interventions is unknown .
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this systematic review was to conduct a comprehensive meta- analysis to synthesize the effectiveness , cost , and cost-effectiveness of lifestyle diabetes prevention interventions and compare effects by intervention delivery agent ( dietitian vs non-dietitian ) and channel ( in-person vs technology-delivered ) .