Most of the outcome question naires had a mixed content reflecting various constructs such as pain and symptoms , sleep disturbances , psychological dysfunctions , physical impairments , and social functions .
STUDY DESIGN A systematic literature review of outcome question naires design ed for assessing functional status or disability in patients with low back pain .
OBJECTIVES To provide a comprehensive overview of all functioning/disability question naires used in recent years and to explore how the main concept(s ) was described or defined in the original paper , the content or the domains of disability , and the measurement properties of the question naires .
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA A number of clinical tools design ed for evaluating the functional status of patients with low back pain have been developed .
Only a few have been review ed earlier , and there has been little focus on the content reflected in the question naires .
A New Approach to the Measurement of Quality of Life: The Patient‐Generated Index
Quality of life has been defined as “ the extent to which our hopes and ambitions are matched by experience . ” To improve a patient 's quality of life through medical care would be to “ narrow the gap between a patient 's hopes and expectations and what actually happens . ” Using the above definition as a conceptual basis , we produced a self-administered , Patient-Generated Index ( PGI ) of quality of life .  The PGI was completed by 359 patients presenting with low back pain . The validity of the measure was assessed by correlating patients ' PGI scores with a well-vali date d health profile , the Short-Form 36-item Health Survey ( SF-36 ) , and with their scores on a clinical back pain question naire . Stepwise multiple regression was then used to model the relationship between the PGI score and the SF-36 . Patients ' PGI scores showed a high correlation with SF-36 scales measuring pain , social functioning , and role limitations attributable to physical problems , and with the clinical question naire . Together with whether a person was retired or not , these health variables were able to explain 25 % of the variance in PGI scores . Patient generated index scores were significantly lower in patients referred to hospital compared with those managed solely in general practice and tended to reflect the general practitioner 's assessment of symptom severity . We conclude that it is possible to construct a question naire that quantifies the effect of a medical condition on patients ' quality of life in a way that has meaning and relevance in the context of their daily lives . The PGI has considerable potential for routine use in a wide range of clinical conditions for which the measurement of outcome has hitherto proved very difficult
Most of the outcome question naires had a mixed content reflecting various constructs such as pain and symptoms , sleep disturbances , psychological dysfunctions , physical impairments , and social functions .
STUDY DESIGN A systematic literature review of outcome question naires design ed for assessing functional status or disability in patients with low back pain .
OBJECTIVES To provide a comprehensive overview of all functioning/disability question naires used in recent years and to explore how the main concept(s ) was described or defined in the original paper , the content or the domains of disability , and the measurement properties of the question naires .
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA A number of clinical tools design ed for evaluating the functional status of patients with low back pain have been developed .
Only a few have been review ed earlier , and there has been little focus on the content reflected in the question naires .