Results indicated that some PFTs may have some prognostic utility , i.e. a trend for more clinical events to be associated with groups classified as ' aspirin resistant ' .
Study -level effect sizes were generally small and absolute outcome risk was not substantially different between ' aspirin resistant ' and ' aspirin sensitive ' design ations .
Based on assumptions of PFTs being able to accurately identify patients at high risk of clinical events and such patients benefiting from treatment modification , the economic model found that a test-treat strategy was likely to be cost-effective .
However , neither assumption is currently evidence based .
BACKGROUND The use of aspirin is well established for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease .
However , a proportion of patients suffer repeat cardiovascular events despite being prescribed aspirin treatment .
It is uncertain whether or not this is due to an inherent inability of aspirin to sufficiently modify platelet activity .
This report aims to investigate whether or not insufficient platelet function inhibition by aspirin ( ' aspirin resistance ' ) , as defined using platelet function tests ( PFTs ) , is linked to the occurrence of adverse clinical outcomes , and further , whether or not patients at risk of future adverse clinical events can be identified through PFTs .
OBJECTIVES To review systematic ally the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness evidence regarding the association between PFT design ation of ' aspirin resistance ' and the risk of adverse clinical outcome ( s ) in patients prescribed aspirin therapy .
To undertake exploratory model-based cost-effectiveness analysis on the use of PFTs .
Usefulness of aspirin resistance after percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction in predicting one-year major adverse coronary events.
Recently , great interest has focused on the phenomenon of aspirin resistance , which may be defined as clinical or laboratory resistance . Monitoring the antiplatelet effect appears to be relevant in the presence of clinical implication s , but no data are available on the possible clinical implication s of the failure of aspirin to inhibit tests of platelet function in the setting of acute coronary syndromes . This study evaluated the role of aspirin resistance in the occurrence of 1-year major adverse coronary events ( MACEs ) in patients with acute myocardial infa rct ion ( AMI ) who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention ( PCI ) . We prospect ively evaluated 146 patients ( 115 men and 31 women ; median age 65 years , range 30 to 84 ) with AMI who underwent primary PCI . Exclusion criteria were the use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors , hematocrit < or=30 % , and a platelet count < 100,000/mm3 . Platelet function analyzer-100 closure times by collagen-epinephrine were used for measuring platelet function in venous blood sample s obtained 12 to 15 hours after revascularization . Patients were considered aspirin resistant in the presence of a collagen-epinephrine closure time of < 203 seconds . After 1-year follow-up , MACEs were recorded in 44 of 146 patients ( 30.1 % ) . A significantly higher percentage of patients with MACEs had aspirin resistance ( 39.1 % vs 23.2 % , p < 0.05 ) . A Kaplan-Meier survival curve showed that the overall risk of MACEs was significantly higher among patients with aspirin resistance ( p = 0.02 ) . A Cox regression analysis that adjusted for age , gender , traditional cardiovascular risk factors , systolic left ventricular function , number of stenosed coronary arteries , and previous AMI , PCI , or coronary artery bypass graft showed aspirin resistance to be a significant and independent risk factor for the future MACEs ( hazard ratio 2.9 , 95 % confidence interval 1.1 to 9.2 , p < 0.05 ) . In conclusion , our data demonstrate that aspirin resistance after PCI is a significant and independent predictor of MACEs in patients with AMI undergoing primary PCI
Results indicated that some PFTs may have some prognostic utility , i.e. a trend for more clinical events to be associated with groups classified as ' aspirin resistant ' .
Study -level effect sizes were generally small and absolute outcome risk was not substantially different between ' aspirin resistant ' and ' aspirin sensitive ' design ations .
Based on assumptions of PFTs being able to accurately identify patients at high risk of clinical events and such patients benefiting from treatment modification , the economic model found that a test-treat strategy was likely to be cost-effective .
However , neither assumption is currently evidence based .
BACKGROUND The use of aspirin is well established for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease .
However , a proportion of patients suffer repeat cardiovascular events despite being prescribed aspirin treatment .
It is uncertain whether or not this is due to an inherent inability of aspirin to sufficiently modify platelet activity .
This report aims to investigate whether or not insufficient platelet function inhibition by aspirin ( ' aspirin resistance ' ) , as defined using platelet function tests ( PFTs ) , is linked to the occurrence of adverse clinical outcomes , and further , whether or not patients at risk of future adverse clinical events can be identified through PFTs .
OBJECTIVES To review systematic ally the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness evidence regarding the association between PFT design ation of ' aspirin resistance ' and the risk of adverse clinical outcome ( s ) in patients prescribed aspirin therapy .
To undertake exploratory model-based cost-effectiveness analysis on the use of PFTs .