EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS The most studied combination therapy for the treatment of male LUTS is the α1-adrenoceptor antagonist/5α-reductase inhibitor combination .
This combination seems to be more efficacious in terms of several outcome variables , in particular in men who have moderate-to-severe LUTS and are at risk of disease progression .
Also in terms of nocturia improvements , this combination is significantly more effective than the monotherapy .
The other often studied combination treatment , in both male and female patients with LUTS , was the combination of antimuscarinics ( in particular solifenacin ) and mirabegron .
This combination seems to be more effective in comparison with the monotherapies with respect to urinary incontinence and urgency urinary incontinence episodes and several other objective and subjective parameters , without relevant increase of adverse events .
The combination of hormone therapy and antimuscarinics in women with LUTS does not seem to be useful .
For the treatment of LUTS in men and women , combination therapy appears to be a promising option to optimize the efficacy of the available drugs for those who do not experience sufficient benefit with monotherapy .
This add-on scenario offers the possibility to have a more tailored approach to the management of LUTS , always seeking the optimal balance between efficacy and tolerability for a given patient .
PATIENT SUMMARY Some combination of drugs may offer advantages over monotherapies for the treatment of voiding and storage complaints in men and women
CONTEXT Several drugs are approved and available for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms ( LUTS ) in men and women .
However , the vast majority of available data , upon which the approval and recommendation in guidelines are based , considered only the role of the monotherapies and did not evaluate possible combination therapies .
OBJECTIVE This systematic review analyzes the efficacy and adverse events of combination therapies for male and female LUTS .
Serenoa repens, lycopene and selenium versus tamsulosin for the treatment of LUTS/BPH. An Italian multicenter double-blinded randomized study between single or combination therapy (PROCOMB trial).
BACKGROUND Phytotherapy has been used to treat patients with lower urinary tract symptoms ( LUTS ) . We evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of combination therapy between Serenoa Repens ( SeR ) , Lycopene ( Ly ) , and Selenium ( Se ) + tamsulosin versus single therapies . METHODS PROCOMB trial ( IS RCT N78639965 ) was a r and omized double-blinded , double-dummy multicenter study of 225 patients between 55 and 80 years old , PSA ≤ 4 ng/ml , IPSS ≥12 , prostate volume ≤60 cc , Qmax ≤15 ml/sec , postvoid residual urine ( PVR ) < 150 ml . Participants were r and omized group A ( SeR-Se-Ly ) , group B ( tamsulosin 0.4 mg ) , group C ( SeR-Se-Ly + tamsulosin 0.4 mg ) . The primary endpoints of the study were the reduction of IPSS , PVR , and increase of Qmax in group C versus monotherapy groups . RESULTS The decrease for combination therapy was significantly greater versus group A ( P < 0.05 ) and group B ( P < 0.01 ) for IPSS and versus group A ( P < 0.01 ) for PVR from baseline to 6 months . A greater decrease in IPSS was observed for Group C versus group A ( P < 0.01 ) and increase in Qmax versus group B ( P < 0.01 ) , from 6 months to 12 months . At one year , the changes of IPSS and Qmax were greater for Group C versus monotherapies ( each comparison < 0.05 ) . The proportions of men with a decrease of at least three points ( each comparison P < 0.05 ) and decrease of 25 % for IPSS ( each comparison P < 0.01 ) were greater for Group C. CONCLUSION SeR-Se-Ly + tamsulosin therapy is more effective than single therapies in improving IPSS and increasing Qmax in patients with LUTS
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS The most studied combination therapy for the treatment of male LUTS is the α1-adrenoceptor antagonist/5α-reductase inhibitor combination .
This combination seems to be more efficacious in terms of several outcome variables , in particular in men who have moderate-to-severe LUTS and are at risk of disease progression .
Also in terms of nocturia improvements , this combination is significantly more effective than the monotherapy .
The other often studied combination treatment , in both male and female patients with LUTS , was the combination of antimuscarinics ( in particular solifenacin ) and mirabegron .
This combination seems to be more effective in comparison with the monotherapies with respect to urinary incontinence and urgency urinary incontinence episodes and several other objective and subjective parameters , without relevant increase of adverse events .
The combination of hormone therapy and antimuscarinics in women with LUTS does not seem to be useful .
For the treatment of LUTS in men and women , combination therapy appears to be a promising option to optimize the efficacy of the available drugs for those who do not experience sufficient benefit with monotherapy .
This add-on scenario offers the possibility to have a more tailored approach to the management of LUTS , always seeking the optimal balance between efficacy and tolerability for a given patient .
PATIENT SUMMARY Some combination of drugs may offer advantages over monotherapies for the treatment of voiding and storage complaints in men and women
CONTEXT Several drugs are approved and available for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms ( LUTS ) in men and women .
However , the vast majority of available data , upon which the approval and recommendation in guidelines are based , considered only the role of the monotherapies and did not evaluate possible combination therapies .
OBJECTIVE This systematic review analyzes the efficacy and adverse events of combination therapies for male and female LUTS .