Moderate evidence was observed for : ( 1 ) no effect of workstation adjustment , ( 2 ) no effect of rest breaks and exercise and ( 3 ) positive effect of alternative pointing devices .
For all other interventions mixed or insufficient evidence of effect was observed .
Conclusion : Few high quality studies were found that examined the effects of interventions in the office on musculoskeletal or visual health
Background : The literature examining the effects of workstation , eyewear and behavioral interventions on  musculoskeletal and visual symptoms among computer users is large and heterogeneous .
Methods : A systematic review of the literature used a best evidence synthesis approach to address the general question “ Do office interventions among computer users have an effect on musculoskeletal or visual health ? ”
A randomised controlled trial of postural interventions for prevention of musculoskeletal symptoms among computer users
Aims : To examine the effect of two workstation and postural interventions on the incidence of  musculoskeletal symptoms among computer users . Methods : R and omised controlled trial of two distinct workstation and postural interventions ( an alternate intervention and a conventional intervention ) among 376 persons using computer keyboards for more than 15 hours per week . The incidence of neck/shoulder symptoms and h and /arm symptoms during six months of follow up among individuals in the intervention groups was compared to the incidence in computer users who did not receive an intervention ( comparison group ) . For individuals in the intervention groups , study staff adjusted workstations , where possible , and trained individuals to assume the intervention postures . Individuals reported musculoskeletal symptoms in a weekly diary . Participants who reported discomfort intensity of 6 or greater on a 0–10 visual analogue scale or who reported musculoskeletal symptoms requiring use of analgesic medication were considered symptomatic . Results : There were no significant differences in the incidence of musculoskeletal symptoms among the three intervention groups . Twenty two ( 18.5 % ) participants in the alternate intervention group , 25 ( 20.2 % ) in the conventional intervention group , and 25 ( 21.7 % ) in the comparison group developed incident arm or h and symptoms . Thirty eight ( 33.3 % ) participants in the alternate intervention group , 36 ( 31.0 % ) in the conventional intervention group , and 33 ( 30.3 % ) in the comparison group developed incident neck or shoulder symptoms . Compliance with all components of the intervention was attained for only 25–38 % of individuals , due mainly to the inflexibility of workstation configurations . Conclusions : This study provides evidence that two specific workplace postural interventions are unlikely to reduce the risk of upper extremity musculoskeletal symptoms among computer users
Moderate evidence was observed for : ( 1 ) no effect of workstation adjustment , ( 2 ) no effect of rest breaks and exercise and ( 3 ) positive effect of alternative pointing devices .
For all other interventions mixed or insufficient evidence of effect was observed .
Conclusion : Few high quality studies were found that examined the effects of interventions in the office on musculoskeletal or visual health
Background : The literature examining the effects of workstation , eyewear and behavioral interventions on  musculoskeletal and visual symptoms among computer users is large and heterogeneous .
Methods : A systematic review of the literature used a best evidence synthesis approach to address the general question “ Do office interventions among computer users have an effect on musculoskeletal or visual health ? ”