Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
Safety and Feasibility of an Exercise Intervention for Patients Following Lung Resection
Purpose . Following surgical lung resection , patients frequently suffer functional decline and reduced activity levels . Despite this exercise interventions are not routinely provided . This study aim ed to establish the safety and feasibility of exercise administered following lung resection in an Australian setting . Method . Pilot r and omized controlled trial . Fifteen individuals ( 53 % male ) , mean ± st and ard deviation age 65.5 ± 16.1 years , undergoing surgery for suspected lung cancer . R and omization occurred postoperatively . Control arm received protocol ized inpatient respiratory physiotherapy . Intervention arm additionally received twice daily exercise until discharge home and twice weekly as outpatient for 8 weeks . Outcome measures ( safety , feasibility , functional capacity , functional mobility , and health-related quality of life [ HRQoL ] ) were assessed preoperatively and 2 and 12 weeks postoperatively . Results . Fifteen participants ( lung cancer n = 10 ) were assigned to control ( n = 8) and intervention ( n = 7 ) groups . Inpatient exercise was delivered on 71 % of occasions ( 35 out of 49 planned sessions ) . Four participants attended outpatient exercise sessions and these participants attended sessions on 81 % of occasions ( 52 out of 64 planned sessions ) . No adverse events occurred . There was a significant between group difference in 6-Minute Walk Test ( 6MWT ; P = .024 ) . In both groups the 6MWT declined from baseline to 2 weeks postoperative and then improved up to 12 weeks ; improvements were greater in the intervention group . Intervention was associated with positive trends of improvement in some HRQoL domains . Conclusions . Exercise intervention performed in the inpatient and outpatient setting s for individuals following lung resection  was safe and feasible . The uptake rate for outpatient exercise was 57 % , similar to previous trials ; however , adherence was excellent within the subgroup of participants who attended . Further research is required to investigate the best setting of exercise delivery and explore ways to improve the uptake rate
Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?