SET was still beneficial for maximal and pain-free walking distances at 12 months , but it did not have a significant effect on quality of life parameters .
AUTHORS ' CONCLUSIONS SET has statistically significant benefit on treadmill walking distance ( maximal and pain-free ) compared with non-supervised regimens .
BACKGROUND Although supervised exercise therapy is considered to be of significant benefit for people with leg pain ( peripheral arterial disease ( PAD ) ) , implementing supervised exercise programs ( SETs ) in daily practice has limitations .
This is an up date of a review first published in 2006 .
OBJECTIVES The main objective of this review was to provide an accurate overview of studies evaluating the effects of supervised versus non-supervised exercise therapy on maximal walking time or distance on a treadmill for people with intermittent claudication .
Peripheral arterial insufficiency, effect of physical training on walking tolerance, calf blood flow, and blood flow resistance.
Twenty-three patients with intermittent claudication were su bmi tted to physical training during 4 - 6 months . Eleven other patients with intermittent claudication served as a control group and were given placebo tablets during the same period . The aim of the investigation was to study the influence of physical training on the blood flow conditions in the calf . The effect of treatment on walking tolerance , on calf blood flow , blood flow resistance , and systolic blood pressure graident between the systemic circulation and the vascular bed in the calf was studied . Half a year after the end of the treatment period the patients were reexamined . The walking tolerance increased in both groups but more in the trained group . The increase in walking tolerance even in the control group was caused by the fact that the control group began to train to some extent . In neither group the maximal calf blood flow changed significantly compared with the pretreatment values . The maximal blood flow showed an increasing trend in the training group after a period fo 4 months compared with the control goupr ( 2p greater than 0.10 ) . The blood flow resistance at maximal dilatation did not change significantly as compared with the initial values in any of the groups , but there was a significant difference ( 2p greater than 0.05 ) between the two groups with a decrease in the training group after 4 months . The changes in maximal calf blood flow and the changes in blood flow resistance at maximal dilatation were not related to the changes in walking tolerance . Half a year after the treatment period the walking tolerance had not decreased and there was no difference between the two groups . The maximal calf blood flow , the blood flow resistance , and the systolic pressure gradient were unchanged in comparison with the pretreatment values and there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups . The small changes in blood flow conditions observed after physical training can not be the only factor explaining the well known improvement in walking tolerance . However , training may cause a redistribution of the blood flow in the working muscle
SET was still beneficial for maximal and pain-free walking distances at 12 months , but it did not have a significant effect on quality of life parameters .
AUTHORS ' CONCLUSIONS SET has statistically significant benefit on treadmill walking distance ( maximal and pain-free ) compared with non-supervised regimens .
BACKGROUND Although supervised exercise therapy is considered to be of significant benefit for people with leg pain ( peripheral arterial disease ( PAD ) ) , implementing supervised exercise programs ( SETs ) in daily practice has limitations .
This is an up date of a review first published in 2006 .
OBJECTIVES The main objective of this review was to provide an accurate overview of studies evaluating the effects of supervised versus non-supervised exercise therapy on maximal walking time or distance on a treadmill for people with intermittent claudication .