There were no significant differences regarding the biomechanical axis or frontal femoral and individual tibial component alignment .
Conclusion This systematic review and meta- analysis demonstrate that alignment with MRI-based PSI is at least as good as , if not better than , that with CT-based PSI .
Purpose Patient-specific instruments ( PSIs ) are already in relatively common use , and their post-operative radiographic results are equal to those for total knee arthroplasty ( TKA ) with conventional instrumentation .
PSI use requires a preoperative MRI scan , CT scan , or a combination of MRI and a long-leg st and ing radiograph .
However , there is no consensus as to which of these modalities , MRI or CT , is the preferred imaging modality when performing TKA with PSIs .
Reliability of templating with patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty.
Magnetic resonance imaging ( MRI ) or computed tomography-based patient-specific instrumentation ( PSI ) may allow for reliable alignment and fewer outliers when compared with conventionally instrumented total knee arthroplasty ( TKA ) . However , some authors have suggested that frequent intraoperative surgeon-directed changes may still be required . This study evaluated the accuracy of  PSI  to predict component sizing and alignment during TKA . A total of 84 patients ( 89 knees ) who underwent a TKA using a PSI system were evaluated . An MRI-based preoperative plan of every knee was provided and approved by the surgeons . This demonstrated the proposed prosthetic component alignment , as well as the femoral , tibial , and bearing insert component size and position . Intraoperative changes to these components were prospect ively recorded and compared with the computerized preoperative plan . Major changes were defined as any changes in femoral or tibial resection , size , and position of the components . Minor changes were defined as any change in the size of the polyethylene bearing insert . The preoperative plan was able to correctly predict the size of the implanted tibial and femoral component in 93 and 95.5 % of the cases , respectively . Thirteen major intraoperative changes were made . In one knee , the proposed femoral resection was not acceptable ( because of the presence of significant amount of osteophytes ) and was ab and oned in favor of a manual extramedullary guide . In another patient , the proposed femoral and tibial components were upsized . In two other patients , the femoral components were downsized , in four patients , the tibial components were downsized , and in another patient , it was upsized . There were also 16 minor changes , which included 2-mm upsizing of the polyethylene liner in 13 knees and 4-mm upsizing in 3 knees . Surgical experience is necessary to recognize improper component size , incorrect surgical resection , or nonideal alignment when performing TKA using PSI . The authors believe that the design and manufacture of PSI combined with a comprehensive templating result ed in excellent intraoperative concordance of the preoperative plan at the default setting s with minimal changes
There were no significant differences regarding the biomechanical axis or frontal femoral and individual tibial component alignment .
Conclusion This systematic review and meta- analysis demonstrate that alignment with MRI-based PSI is at least as good as , if not better than , that with CT-based PSI .
Purpose Patient-specific instruments ( PSIs ) are already in relatively common use , and their post-operative radiographic results are equal to those for total knee arthroplasty ( TKA ) with conventional instrumentation .
PSI use requires a preoperative MRI scan , CT scan , or a combination of MRI and a long-leg st and ing radiograph .
However , there is no consensus as to which of these modalities , MRI or CT , is the preferred imaging modality when performing TKA with PSIs .