All existing economic evaluations in smoking cessation lack in one or more key study attributes necessary to be fully transferable to a new context
AIMS To identify different types of models used in economic evaluations of smoking cessation , analyse the quality of the included models examining their attributes and ascertain their transferability to a new context .
Cost-effectiveness analysis of a European primary-care physician training in smoking cessation counseling
Background  Physician training in smoking cessation counseling  has been shown to be effective as a means to increase quit success . We assessed the cost-effectiveness ratio of a smoking cessation counseling training programme . Its effectiveness was previously demonstrated in a cluster r and omized , control trial performed in two Swiss university out patients clinics , in which residents were r and omized to receive training in smoking interventions or a control educational intervention .  Design and methods We used a Markov simulation model for effectiveness analysis . This model incorporates the intervention efficacy , the natural quit rate , and the lifetime probability of relapse after 1-year abstinence . We used previously published results in addition to hospital service and outpatient clinic cost data . The time horizon was 1 year , and we opted for a third-party payer perspective . Results The incremental cost of the intervention amounted to US$ 2.58 per consultation by a smoker , translating into a cost per life-year saved of US$ 25.4 for men and 35.2 for women . One-way sensitivity analyses yielded a range of US$ 4.0 - 107.1 in men and US$ 9.7 - 148.6 in women . Variations in the quit rate of the control intervention , the length of training effectiveness , and the discount rate yielded moderately large effects on the outcome . Variations in the natural cessation rate , the lifetime probability of relapse , the cost of physician training , the counseling time , the cost per hour of physician time , and the cost of the booklets had little effect on the cost-effectiveness ratio . Conclusions Training residents in smoking cessation counseling  is a very cost-effective intervention and may be more efficient than currently accepted tobacco control interventions
All existing economic evaluations in smoking cessation lack in one or more key study attributes necessary to be fully transferable to a new context
AIMS To identify different types of models used in economic evaluations of smoking cessation , analyse the quality of the included models examining their attributes and ascertain their transferability to a new context .