Where data were available , the relative benefits seen held true both after a single or multiple procedure(s ) .
For patients with persistent atrial fibrillation , CA achieves significantly greater freedom from recurrent atrial fibrillation compared with medical therapy .
BACKGROUND Catheter ablation ( CA ) is commonly performed for persistent atrial fibrillation , but few high- quality r and omized controlled trials ( RCTs ) exist , leading to funding restrictions being proposed in several countries .
We performed a r and om-effects meta- analysis of RCTs and non- RCTs to assess the efficacy of CA for persistent atrial fibrillation .
Randomized Ablation Strategies for the Treatment of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: RASTA Study
Background — The single-procedure efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) is less than optimal in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation ( AF ) . Adjunctive techniques have been developed to enhance single-procedure efficacy in these patients . We conducted a study to compare 3 ablation strategies in patients with persistent AF . Methods and Results — Subjects were r and omized as follows : arm 1 , PVI + ablation of non-PV triggers identified using a stimulation protocol ( st and ard approach ) ; arm 2 , st and ard approach + empirical ablation at common non-PV AF trigger sites ( mitral annulus , fossa ovalis , eustachian ridge , crista terminalis , and superior vena cava ) ; or arm 3 , st and ard approach + ablation of left atrial complex fractionated electrogram sites . Patients were seen at 6 weeks , 6 months , and 1 year ; transtelephonic monitoring was performed at each visit . Antiarrhythmic drugs were discontinued at 3 to 6 months . The primary study end point was freedom from atrial arrhythmias off antiarrhythmic drugs at 1 year after a single-ablation procedure . A total of 156 patients ( aged 59±9 years ; 136 males ; AF duration , 47±50 months ) participated ( arm 1 , 55 patients ; arm 2 , 50 patients ; arm 3 , 51 patients ) . Procedural outcomes ( procedure , fluoroscopy , and PVI times ) were comparable between the 3 arms . More lesions were required to target non-PV trigger sites than a complex fractionated electrogram ( 33±9 versus 22±9 ; P<0.001 ) . The primary end point was achieved in 71 patients and was worse in arm 3 ( 29 % ) compared with arm 1 ( 49 % ; P=0.04 ) and arm 2 ( 58 % ; P=0.004 ) . Conclusions — These data suggest that additional substrate modification beyond PVI does not improve single-procedure efficacy in patients with persistent AF . Clinical Trial Registration — URL : http://www . clinical trials.gov . Unique identifier : NCT00379301
Where data were available , the relative benefits seen held true both after a single or multiple procedure(s ) .
For patients with persistent atrial fibrillation , CA achieves significantly greater freedom from recurrent atrial fibrillation compared with medical therapy .
BACKGROUND Catheter ablation ( CA ) is commonly performed for persistent atrial fibrillation , but few high- quality r and omized controlled trials ( RCTs ) exist , leading to funding restrictions being proposed in several countries .
We performed a r and om-effects meta- analysis of RCTs and non- RCTs to assess the efficacy of CA for persistent atrial fibrillation .