The articles were grouped into four main categories : decision aids and outcome predictors , electrical cardioversion-based protocol s , antiarrhythmic-based protocol s , and general management protocol s. Conclusion This systematic review is the first study to our knowledge to evaluate the optimal management of symptomatic AF/AFLin  the ED with a direct impact on ED disposition .
There are several viable management strategies that can result in safe discharge from the ED in the right patient population , and decision aids can be utilized to guide selection of appropriate patients for discharge
Introduction Management of  atrial fibrillation ( AF ) and atrial flutter ( AFL )  in the emergency department ( ED ) varies greatly , and there are currently no United States guidelines to guide management with regard to patient disposition after ED treatment .
The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the literature for decision aids to guide disposition of patients with AF/AFLin the ED , and assess potential outcomes associated with different management strategies in the ED .
Cardioversion of acute atrial fibrillation in the short observation unit: comparison of a protocol focused on electrical cardioversion with simple antiarrhythmic treatment
Background Direct current cardioversion ( DCC ) has been shown to be effective for the management of  atrial fibrillation ( AF )  in the emergency department ( ED ) . Pharmacological cardioversion was compared with a strategy including DCC on patients with uncomplicated , recent-onset ( < 48 h ) AF managed in a short observation unit ( SOU ) . Methods A prospect i ve observational study was undertaken over a period of 13 months in two institutions . A DCC-centred protocol was applied to 171 AF cases in a hospital ( DCC-cohort ) and pharmacological cardioversion to 151 AF cases in another hospital ( P-cohort ) . Patients remaining in AF after 24 h were admitted . The outcomes were rate of discharge in sinus rhythm , length of stay in the ED-SOU , rate of hospitalisation and complications of treatment . Data collected were analysed according to Student t test and χ2 statistics . Results Discharge in sinus rhythm was achieved in 159/171 cases in the DCC-cohort and 77/151 cases in the P-cohort ( 93 % vs 51 % ; number needed to treat ( NNT ) 2.4 ; 95 % CI 2.0 to 3.1 , p<0.001 ) , whereas mean length of stay was 7 + 7 h in the DCC-cohort and 9 + 6 h in the P-cohort ( p=0.43 ) . Eleven cases from the DCC-cohort and 67 from the P-cohort were admitted ( admission rate 6 % vs 44 % ; NNT 2.6 ; 95 % CI 2.2 to 3.5 , p<0.001 ) . Three short-term complications occurred in the DCC-cohort and five in the P-cohort ( 2 % vs 3 % , p=0.59 ) . Two strokes were registered in the DCC-cohort during 6-month follow-up ( p undefined ) . Conclusions Electrical cardioversion of recent-onset AF in the SOU is safe , effective and reduces hospitalisations . Further studies are needed to identify the most cost-effective strategy for the management of AF patients in emergency setting
The articles were grouped into four main categories : decision aids and outcome predictors , electrical cardioversion-based protocol s , antiarrhythmic-based protocol s , and general management protocol s. Conclusion This systematic review is the first study to our knowledge to evaluate the optimal management of symptomatic AF/AFLin  the ED with a direct impact on ED disposition .
There are several viable management strategies that can result in safe discharge from the ED in the right patient population , and decision aids can be utilized to guide selection of appropriate patients for discharge
Introduction Management of  atrial fibrillation ( AF ) and atrial flutter ( AFL )  in the emergency department ( ED ) varies greatly , and there are currently no United States guidelines to guide management with regard to patient disposition after ED treatment .
The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the literature for decision aids to guide disposition of patients with AF/AFLin the ED , and assess potential outcomes associated with different management strategies in the ED .