While there are many different scoring systems available for foot and ankle specialists to use to assess or demonstrate the effectiveness of treatments , the AOFAS , while it is an unvali date d scoring system , is the most commonly used scoring system in this review .
This review presents data about commonly used patient reported outcomes systems in foot and ankle surgery .
The goal of this systematic review is to determine the most commonly used outcome measurement tools used by foot and ankle specialists and determine their limitations , such as whether they are vali date d , have floor/ceiling effects , and so on .
Clinical interpretation of computerized adaptive test outcome measures in patients with foot/ankle impairments.
STUDY DESIGN Prospect i ve cohort study of 10 287 patients with foot/ankle impairments receiving outpatient physical therapy .  OBJECTIVES To describe meaningful interpretations of functional status ( FS ) outcomes measures , estimated using a body-part-specific computerized adaptive test ( CAT ) . BACKGROUND Increased use of CATs to generate outcome measures in rehabilitation has stimulated questions concerning score interpretation . Identifying meaningful intra-individual change and reporting clinical interpretation of those generated outcomes are essential to advance the quality of rehabilitation practice . METHODS We performed 4 approaches to clinical ly interpret outcomes data . First , we used the st and ard error of the estimate to construct a 90 % confidence interval for each CAT estimated score . Second , we presented the percentile rank of FS scores . Third , we used 2 threshold approaches to define individual-patient-level change : statistically reliable change and clinical ly important change . Last , we illustrated a functional staging method . RESULTS Precision of a single score was estimated by an FS score of + /-4 . Based on score distribution , percentile ranks at 25th , 50th , and 75th percentiles corresponded to intake FS scores of 38 , 47 , and 57 , and discharge FS scores of 52 , 64 , and 77 , respectively . Minimal detectable change supported 7 or more FS change units out of 100 represented statistically reliable change , and ROC analyses supported 8 or more FS change units represented minimal clinical ly important improvement . Using a functional staging system , we established 5 hierarchical functional status levels . CONCLUSION CAT-generated outcome measures can be interpreted to improve clinical interpretation and to assist clinicians in using patient-reported outcomes during therapy practice
While there are many different scoring systems available for foot and ankle specialists to use to assess or demonstrate the effectiveness of treatments , the AOFAS , while it is an unvali date d scoring system , is the most commonly used scoring system in this review .
This review presents data about commonly used patient reported outcomes systems in foot and ankle surgery .
The goal of this systematic review is to determine the most commonly used outcome measurement tools used by foot and ankle specialists and determine their limitations , such as whether they are vali date d , have floor/ceiling effects , and so on .