Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
Effect of exercise on the caloric intake of breast cancer patients undergoing treatment.
The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of an exercise intervention on the total caloric intake ( TCI ) of breast cancer patients undergoing treatment . A secondary purpose was to determine whether or not a relationship existed between changes in TCI , body fat composition ( % BF ) , and fatigue during the study , which lasted 6 months . Twenty females recently diagnosed with breast cancer , scheduled to undergo chemotherapy or radiation , were assigned r and omly to an experimental ( N = 10 ) or control group ( N = 10 ) . Outcome measures included TCI ( 3-day food diary ) , % BF ( skinfolds ) , and fatigue ( revised Piper Fatigue Scale ) . Each exercise session was conducted as follows : initial cardiovascular activity ( 6 - 12 min ) , followed by stretching ( 5 - 10 min ) , resistance training ( 15 - 30 min ) , and a cool-down ( approximately 8 min ) . Significant changes in TCI were observed among groups ( F1,18 = 8.582 ; P = 0.009 ) , at treatments 2 and 3 , and at the end of the study [ experimental ( 1973 + /- 419 ) , control ( 1488 + /- 418 ) ; experimental ( 1946 + /- 437 ) , control ( 1436 + /- 429 ) ; experimental ( 2315 + /- 455 ) , control ( 1474 + /- 294 ) , respectively ] . A significant negative correlation was found ( Spearman rho(18 ) = -0.759 ; P < 0.001 ) between TCI and % BF and between TCI and fatigue levels ( Spearman rho(18 ) = -0.541 ; P = 0.014 ) at the end of the study . In conclusion , the results of this study suggest that an exercise intervention administered to breast cancer patients undergoing medical treatment may assist in the mitigation of some treatment side effects , including decreased TCI , increased fatigue , and negative changes in body composition
Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?