The cost of intervention per participant delivered by dietitians was lower than interventions delivered by non-dietitians , although few studies reported costs .
Lifestyle interventions are effective in reducing body weight and glucose-related outcomes .
Dietitian-delivered interventions , compared with those delivered by other personnel , achieved greater weight reduction .
No consistent trend was identified across different delivery channels
BACKGROUND Type 2 diabetes is a significant public health concern .
With the completion of the Diabetes Prevention Program , there has been a proliferation of studies attempting to translate this evidence base into practice .
However , the cost , effectiveness , and cost-effectiveness of these adapted interventions is unknown .
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this systematic review was to conduct a comprehensive meta- analysis to synthesize the effectiveness , cost , and cost-effectiveness of lifestyle diabetes prevention interventions and compare effects by intervention delivery agent ( dietitian vs non-dietitian ) and channel ( in-person vs technology-delivered ) .
Can the onset of type 2 diabetes be delayed by a group-based lifestyle intervention? A randomised control trial
This study was a r and omised control trial with a waiting control group . It was design ed to evaluate the effectiveness of a 6-month , group-based diabetes prevention programme , The Healthy Living Course and assess whether participation in the programme led to changes in modifiable risk factors for type 2 diabetes among an already at-risk pre-diabetic population . Individuals design ated at risk for diabetes by their general practitioners ( GPs ) were screened using an Oral Glucose Tolerance Test . Volunteers ( N = 307 ) with pre-diabetes were assigned to an intervention or wait-control group in the ratio of approximately 2 : 1 . The sample was pre-tested on biochemical , anthropometric and self-report behavioural , cognitive and mood variables and post-tested either at the end of the educational/support-based lifestyle programme or the end of the wait period . The intervention group significantly improved their diabetes knowledge , motivation to change , positive affect , healthy eating and activity levels and showed significantly greater reductions in weight , body mass index , waist circumference , diastolic blood pressure and fasting plasma glucose in comparison with controls . The intervention group also changed their diagnostic status from pre-diabetes to non-diabetes at a greater rate than the wait group ( 43 % vs. 26 % ) who received st and ard care from their GPs
The cost of intervention per participant delivered by dietitians was lower than interventions delivered by non-dietitians , although few studies reported costs .
Lifestyle interventions are effective in reducing body weight and glucose-related outcomes .
Dietitian-delivered interventions , compared with those delivered by other personnel , achieved greater weight reduction .
No consistent trend was identified across different delivery channels
BACKGROUND Type 2 diabetes is a significant public health concern .
With the completion of the Diabetes Prevention Program , there has been a proliferation of studies attempting to translate this evidence base into practice .
However , the cost , effectiveness , and cost-effectiveness of these adapted interventions is unknown .
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this systematic review was to conduct a comprehensive meta- analysis to synthesize the effectiveness , cost , and cost-effectiveness of lifestyle diabetes prevention interventions and compare effects by intervention delivery agent ( dietitian vs non-dietitian ) and channel ( in-person vs technology-delivered ) .