Results Significant differences were found in the femoral offset and overall complication rate between the conventional and navigation groups .
Additionally , the conventional group had significantly less anteversion than the navigation group .
However , the navigation group had significantly better inclination .
The operation time was significantly shorter in the conventional than navigation group .
Conclusion Both the OrthoPilot navigation system and conventional total hip arthroplasty result in significant improvements in patient function with similar overall complication rates and have their own advantages in achieving good cup position .
The conventional procedure has a shorter operation time than does use of a navigation system
Objective This study was performed to compare the clinical efficacy between the OrthoPilot navigation system and conventional manual surgery in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty .
Leg length discrepancy, dislocation rate, and offset in total hip replacement using a short modular stem: navigation vs conventional freehand.
We present a match-paired study between computer-assisted and freeh and techniques using a short modular femoral stem ( Metha ; B. Braun Aesculap , Tuttlingen , Germany ) in  total hip replacement ( THR ) .  Surgical time , clinical outcome , dislocation rate , limb length , and offset in 44 patients with ideal indication for this more conservative implant were assessed . Despite both longer surgical time and similar early outcomes , the results showed how computer-assisted techniques allow easier management of limb length discrepancy and offset restoring . We believe that navigated short modular stems are safe for less invasive THR
Results Significant differences were found in the femoral offset and overall complication rate between the conventional and navigation groups .
Additionally , the conventional group had significantly less anteversion than the navigation group .
However , the navigation group had significantly better inclination .
The operation time was significantly shorter in the conventional than navigation group .
Conclusion Both the OrthoPilot navigation system and conventional total hip arthroplasty result in significant improvements in patient function with similar overall complication rates and have their own advantages in achieving good cup position .
The conventional procedure has a shorter operation time than does use of a navigation system
Objective This study was performed to compare the clinical efficacy between the OrthoPilot navigation system and conventional manual surgery in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty .