REVIEW ER 'S CONCLUSIONS There is no evidence to support feeding with a hydrolysed formula for the prevention of allergy in preference to exclusive breast feeding .
In high risk infants who are unable to be completely breast fed , there is evidence that prolonged feeding with a hydrolysed compared to a cow 's milk formula reduces infant and childhood allergy and infant CMA .
BACKGROUND Allergies and food reactions are common and may be associated with foods including adapted cow 's milk formulas .
Formulas containing hydrolysed proteins have been used to treat infants with allergy or food intolerance , and have been advocated for prevention of allergy and food intolerance in infants .
OBJECTIVES To determine whether use of hydrolysed formulas for infant feeding prevents allergy and food intolerance .
If hydrolysed formulas are effective , to determine what type of hydrolysed formula is most effective including extensively and partially hydrolysed formulas .
To determine which infants benefit including infants at low or high risk of allergy and infants receiving early , short term or prolonged formula feeding .
Allergy development and macromolecular absorption in infants with different feeding regimens during the first three days of life. A three‐year prospective follow‐up
A group of 129 infants were r and omly assigned at birth to one of three feeding regimens : human milk ( HM ) , cow 's milk formula ( CMF ) or a casein hydrolysate formula ( CHF ) during the first 3 days of life . Blood sample s were taken on at 4 days and at 2 , 4 , 8 , 12 and 24 months of age . Macromolecular absorption was analysed by measuring the serum concentration of human α‐lactalbumin ( S‐α‐LA ) with a competitive radioimmunoassay ( RIA ) . Total serum IgE was measured by RIA . A family history of allergy correlated to the proportion of infants with allergic symptoms both at 24 and 36 months of age ( p= 0.03 and p= 0.04 respectively ) . In none of the three groups did correlation exist between the duration of breastfeeding and serum α‐LA , serum IgE , family history of allergy , frequency of allergic symptoms and proportion of infants with infections
REVIEW ER 'S CONCLUSIONS There is no evidence to support feeding with a hydrolysed formula for the prevention of allergy in preference to exclusive breast feeding .
In high risk infants who are unable to be completely breast fed , there is evidence that prolonged feeding with a hydrolysed compared to a cow 's milk formula reduces infant and childhood allergy and infant CMA .
BACKGROUND Allergies and food reactions are common and may be associated with foods including adapted cow 's milk formulas .
Formulas containing hydrolysed proteins have been used to treat infants with allergy or food intolerance , and have been advocated for prevention of allergy and food intolerance in infants .
OBJECTIVES To determine whether use of hydrolysed formulas for infant feeding prevents allergy and food intolerance .
If hydrolysed formulas are effective , to determine what type of hydrolysed formula is most effective including extensively and partially hydrolysed formulas .
To determine which infants benefit including infants at low or high risk of allergy and infants receiving early , short term or prolonged formula feeding .