Surgery results in greater improvement in weight loss outcomes and weight associated comorbidities compared with non-surgical interventions , regardless of the type of procedures used .
When compared with each other , certain procedures result ed in greater weight loss and improvements in comorbidities than others .
Outcomes were similar between RYGB and sleeve gastrectomy , and both of these procedures had better outcomes than adjustable gastric b and ing .
For people with very high BMI , biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch result ed in greater weight loss than RYGB .
Isolated sleeve gastrectomy led to better weight-loss outcomes than adjustable gastric b and ing after three years follow-up .
BACKGROUND Bariatric ( weight loss ) surgery for obesity is considered when other treatments have failed .
The effects of the available bariatric procedures compared with medical management and with each other are uncertain .
This is an up date of a Cochrane review first published in 2003 and most recently up date d in 2009 .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of bariatric surgery for overweight and obesity , including the control of comorbidities .
Lifestyle intervention favorably affects weight loss and maintenance following obesity surgery.
The present study was design ed to evaluate the 3 year effects of a lifestyle intervention on weight loss and maintenance , dietary , and physical activity habits and eating behavior of patients following vertical b and ed gastroplasty ( VBG ) . Thirty severely obese female volunteers were included in the study and they were r and omly assigned to one of two intervention groups : usual care ( UC ) or lifestyle intervention ( LS ) group . Patients were followed for 3 years postoperatively . Outcome measures included weight loss , dietary habits , physical activity level ( PAL ) , and eating behavior changes . Weight was significantly lower in the LS group after 12 months ( 84.4 + /- 3.9 kg vs. 98.4 + /- 4.4 kg , P < 0.05 ) , 24 months ( 83.0 + /- 3.3 vs. 101.9 + /- 5.3 kg , P < 0.05 ) , and 36 months following surgery ( 84.2 + /- 3.3 vs. 102.5 + /- 3.5 kg , P < 0.05 ) . Repeated measures ANOVA revealed significant differences between the two groups overall and at specific time points for the PAL and TV viewing . With regard to eating behavior , the LS group scored significantly better in total Dutch Eating Behavior Question naire ( DEBQ ) , Restraint Eating and External Eating scales at all postoperative time points . Similarly , significant differences were found between the two groups in dietary intake . These findings outline the importance of lifestyle intervention on weight loss and maintenance following bariatric surgery . The favorable effects of lifestyle intervention may be through adoption of healthier eating behaviors and increased physical activity
Surgery results in greater improvement in weight loss outcomes and weight associated comorbidities compared with non-surgical interventions , regardless of the type of procedures used .
When compared with each other , certain procedures result ed in greater weight loss and improvements in comorbidities than others .
Outcomes were similar between RYGB and sleeve gastrectomy , and both of these procedures had better outcomes than adjustable gastric b and ing .
For people with very high BMI , biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch result ed in greater weight loss than RYGB .
Isolated sleeve gastrectomy led to better weight-loss outcomes than adjustable gastric b and ing after three years follow-up .
BACKGROUND Bariatric ( weight loss ) surgery for obesity is considered when other treatments have failed .
The effects of the available bariatric procedures compared with medical management and with each other are uncertain .
This is an up date of a Cochrane review first published in 2003 and most recently up date d in 2009 .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of bariatric surgery for overweight and obesity , including the control of comorbidities .