Compared with st and ard total hip replacement , mini-incision procedures may have small perioperative advantages in terms of less blood loss , shorter operative time , and shorter inpatient stay , but the differences were not clinical ly important .
Few complications were reported , and the complication rate did not differ significantly between groups .
There was insufficient evidence to suggest any major difference in the short-term revision rate , and confidence intervals for surrogate measures for long-term outcome were broad enough to include clinical ly important differences in favor of either approach .
Although there were marginal short-term advantages and disadvantages for each of the surgical techniques , there was no strong evidence either for or against mini-incision compared with st and ard-incision total hip replacement .
Importantly , evidence on longer-term performance , especially the risk of revision arthroplasty , for mini-incision hip arthroplasty is very limited
BACKGROUND Mini-incision total hip replacement continues the current trend in orthopaedics and other specialties toward smaller-incision surgery .
The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the effectiveness and safety of single mini-incision compared with st and ard-incision total hip replacement for treatment of arthritis of the hip .
Component position following total hip arthroplasty through a miniinvasive posterolateral approach.
Implant malposition and poor fixation are potential risks of compromising long-term results after total hip arthroplasty performed with a minimally invasive technique . Between September 2000 and February 2002 , 120 cemented primary total hip arthroplasties were performed at the authors ' institutions in patients with primary osteoarthritis of the hip and with BMI lower than 35 . In 60 of these cases selected at r and om , a posterolateral incision no longer than 10 cm was used . The other 60 THA 's were performed through a st and ard posterolateral approach . The inclination and anteversion of the cup and the position of the femoral stem were assessed on radiographs and statistically evaluated . In the miniinvasive group , the average inclination angle of the cup was 42.3 degrees ( range : 36 to 52 degrees ) and the anteversion angle 13.6 degrees ( range : 6 to 29 degrees ) . The coronal alignment of the femoral component was within 3 degrees of neutral in 54 cases ( 90.0 % ) . Following conventional implantation in the other group , the average cup inclination angle was 42.4 degrees ( range : 35 to 50 degrees ) and the anteversion angle 13.6 degrees ( range : 8 to 24 degrees . A total of 53 stems ( 88.3 % ) were implanted optimally . Statistical analysis found no significant difference between the two groups regarding components position . These findings suggest that using a smaller posterolateral incision as was done in this study does not introduce a potential risk of compromising long-term results
Compared with st and ard total hip replacement , mini-incision procedures may have small perioperative advantages in terms of less blood loss , shorter operative time , and shorter inpatient stay , but the differences were not clinical ly important .
Few complications were reported , and the complication rate did not differ significantly between groups .
There was insufficient evidence to suggest any major difference in the short-term revision rate , and confidence intervals for surrogate measures for long-term outcome were broad enough to include clinical ly important differences in favor of either approach .
Although there were marginal short-term advantages and disadvantages for each of the surgical techniques , there was no strong evidence either for or against mini-incision compared with st and ard-incision total hip replacement .
Importantly , evidence on longer-term performance , especially the risk of revision arthroplasty , for mini-incision hip arthroplasty is very limited
BACKGROUND Mini-incision total hip replacement continues the current trend in orthopaedics and other specialties toward smaller-incision surgery .
The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the effectiveness and safety of single mini-incision compared with st and ard-incision total hip replacement for treatment of arthritis of the hip .