The evidence was uncertain for whether UCTs impacted livestock ownership , extreme poverty , participation in child labour , adult employment or parenting quality .
This body of evidence suggests that unconditional cash transfers ( UCTs ) may not impact a summary measure of health service use in children and adults in LMICs .
However , UCTs probably or may improve some health outcomes ( i.e. the likelihood of having had any illness , the likelihood of having been food secure , and the level of dietary diversity ) , one social determinant of health ( i.e. the likelihood of attending school ) , and healthcare expenditure .
BACKGROUND Unconditional cash transfers ( UCTs ; provided without obligation ) for reducing poverty and vulnerabilities ( e.g. orphanhood , old age or HIV infection ) are a type of social protection intervention that addresses a key social determinant of health ( income ) in low- and middle-income countries ( LMICs ) .
The relative effectiveness of UCTs compared with conditional cash transfers ( CCTs ; provided so long as the recipient engages in prescribed behaviours such as using a health service or attending school ) is unknown .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of UCTs for improving health services use and health outcomes in vulnerable children and adults in LMICs .
Secondary objectives are to assess the effects of UCTs on social determinants of health and healthcare expenditure and to compare to effects of UCTs versus CCTs .
Effects of cash transfers on Children’s health and social protection in Sub-Saharan Africa: differences in outcomes based on orphan status and household assets
Background Unconditional and conditional cash transfer programmes ( UCT and CCT ) show potential to improve the well-being of orphans and other children made vulnerable by HIV/AIDS ( OVC ) . We address the gap in current underst and ing about the extent to which household-based cash transfers differentially impact individual children ’s outcomes , according to risk or protective factors such as orphan status and household assets . Methods Data were obtained from a cluster-r and omised controlled trial in eastern Zimbabwe , with r and om assignment to three study arms – UCT , CCT or control . The sample included 5,331 children ages 6 - 17 from 1,697 households . Generalized linear mixed models were specified to predict OVC health vulnerability ( child chronic illness and disability ) and social protection ( birth registration and 90 % school attendance ) . Models included child-level risk factors ( age , orphan status ) ; household risk factors ( adults with chronic illnesses and disabilities , greater household size ) ; and household protective factors ( including asset-holding ) . Interactions were systematic ally tested . Results Orphan status was associated with decreased likelihood for birth registration , and paternal orphans and children for whom both parents ’ survival status was unknown were less likely to attend school . In the UCT arm , paternal orphans fared better in likelihood of birth registration compared with non-paternal orphans . Effects of study arms on outcomes were not moderated by any other risk or protective factors . High household asset-holding was associated with decreased likelihood of child ’s chronic illness and increased birth registration and school attendance , but household assets did not moderate the effects of cash transfers on risk or protective factors . Conclusion Orphaned children are at higher risk for poor social protection outcomes even when cared for in family-based setting s. UCT and CCT each produced direct effects on children ’s social protection which are not moderated by other child- and household-level risk factors , but orphans are less likely to attend school or obtain birth registration . The effects of UCT and CCT are not moderated by asset-holding , but greater household assets predict greater social protection outcomes . Intervention efforts need to focus on ameliorating the additional risk burden carried by orphaned children . These efforts might include caregiver education , and additional incentives based on efforts made specifically for orphaned children
The evidence was uncertain for whether UCTs impacted livestock ownership , extreme poverty , participation in child labour , adult employment or parenting quality .
This body of evidence suggests that unconditional cash transfers ( UCTs ) may not impact a summary measure of health service use in children and adults in LMICs .
However , UCTs probably or may improve some health outcomes ( i.e. the likelihood of having had any illness , the likelihood of having been food secure , and the level of dietary diversity ) , one social determinant of health ( i.e. the likelihood of attending school ) , and healthcare expenditure .
BACKGROUND Unconditional cash transfers ( UCTs ; provided without obligation ) for reducing poverty and vulnerabilities ( e.g. orphanhood , old age or HIV infection ) are a type of social protection intervention that addresses a key social determinant of health ( income ) in low- and middle-income countries ( LMICs ) .
The relative effectiveness of UCTs compared with conditional cash transfers ( CCTs ; provided so long as the recipient engages in prescribed behaviours such as using a health service or attending school ) is unknown .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of UCTs for improving health services use and health outcomes in vulnerable children and adults in LMICs .
Secondary objectives are to assess the effects of UCTs on social determinants of health and healthcare expenditure and to compare to effects of UCTs versus CCTs .