Mirtazapine was significantly more effective than a serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor ( venlafaxine only , two trials , n = 415 ) at two weeks ( OR 2.29 , 95 % CI 1.45 to 3.59 ) and at the end of acute-phase treatment ( OR 1.53 , 95 % CI 1.03 to 2.25).In terms of dropouts , there was no robust evidence to detect a difference between mirtazapine and other antidepressants .
Mirtazapine was more likely to cause weight gain or increased appetite and somnolence than SSRIs but less likely to cause nausea or vomiting and sexual dysfunction .
AUTHORS ' CONCLUSIONS Some statistically significant and possibly clinical ly meaningful differences between mirtazapine and other antidepressive agents were found for the acute-phase treatment of major depression .
Mirtazapine is likely to have a faster onset of action than SSRIs during the acute-phase treatment .
Dropouts occur similarly in participants treated with mirtazapine and those treated with other antidepressants , although the adverse event profile of mirtazapine is unique
BACKGROUND Mirtazapine has a unique mechanism of antidepressive action and is one of the commonly used antidepressants in clinical practice .
OBJECTIVES The aim of the present review was to assess the evidence on the efficacy and acceptability of mirtazapine compared with other antidepressive agents in the acute-phase treatment of major depression in adults .
Double‐blind study of the efficacy and safety of sertraline versus fluoxetine in major depression
An eight-week double-blind , multicentre study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sertraline vs. fluoxetine in the treatment of major depression ( DSM-III-R ) . There were 108 out- patients , from nine Italian centres , entered into the study , of whom 88 were evaluable ( 48 sertraline , 40 fluoxetine ) . The final mean daily dose of sertraline was 72 mg and for fluoxetine it was 28 mg . Both treatment groups showed a statistically significant improvement from baseline at one week , and this was maintained until the end of treatment for all of the following measures : Hamilton Rating Scales for Depression and Anxiety , the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale , Clinical Global Impressions Scale , Zung Self-Rating Scale for Anxiety and the Leeds Sleep Evaluation Question naire . Although there was a numerical advantage for sertraline on several efficacy measures , there was no statistically significant difference found between the treatment groups . The incidence of adverse events was similar for both treatments ; 40.4 % for sertraline and 39.3 % for fluoxetine . However , adverse events were generally rated by patients as of lower severity in the sertraline group . In addition , for the fluoxetine group , there was a higher incidence of agitation , anxiety and insomnia than for sertraline . Sertraline was considered to be better tolerated than fluoxetine overall , since only 9.6 % of sertraline-treated patients discontinued treatment due to therapy failure whereas in the fluoxetine-treated group this figure was 19.6 % . By contrast , 13.5 % of sertraline-treated patients discontinued prematurely because of clinical improvement , compared with 10.7 % of fluoxetine-treated patients
Mirtazapine was significantly more effective than a serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor ( venlafaxine only , two trials , n = 415 ) at two weeks ( OR 2.29 , 95 % CI 1.45 to 3.59 ) and at the end of acute-phase treatment ( OR 1.53 , 95 % CI 1.03 to 2.25).In terms of dropouts , there was no robust evidence to detect a difference between mirtazapine and other antidepressants .
Mirtazapine was more likely to cause weight gain or increased appetite and somnolence than SSRIs but less likely to cause nausea or vomiting and sexual dysfunction .
AUTHORS ' CONCLUSIONS Some statistically significant and possibly clinical ly meaningful differences between mirtazapine and other antidepressive agents were found for the acute-phase treatment of major depression .
Mirtazapine is likely to have a faster onset of action than SSRIs during the acute-phase treatment .
Dropouts occur similarly in participants treated with mirtazapine and those treated with other antidepressants , although the adverse event profile of mirtazapine is unique
BACKGROUND Mirtazapine has a unique mechanism of antidepressive action and is one of the commonly used antidepressants in clinical practice .
OBJECTIVES The aim of the present review was to assess the evidence on the efficacy and acceptability of mirtazapine compared with other antidepressive agents in the acute-phase treatment of major depression in adults .