This approach has been design ed to provide adequate analgesia while minimizing exposure to adverse events
Background : Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has advantages over the open procedure for postoperative pain .
However , a systematic review of postoperative pain management in this procedure has not been conducted .
Pain and analgesic response after third molar extraction and other postsurgical pain
& NA ; There is uncertainty over whether the patient group in which acute pain studies are conducted ( pain model ) has any influence on the estimate of analgesic efficacy . Data from four recently up date d systematic review s of aspirin 600/650 mg , paracetamol 600/650 mg , paracetamol 1000 mg and ibuprofen 400 mg were used to investigate the influence of pain model . Area under the pain relief versus time curve equivalent to at least 50 % maximum pain relief over 6 h was used as the outcome measure . Event rates with treatment and placebo , and relative benefit ( RB ) and number needed to treat ( NNT ) were used as outputs from the meta‐analyses . The event rate with  placebo was systematic ally statistically lower for dental than postsurgical pain for all four treatments . Event rates with analgesics , RB and NNT were infrequently different between the pain models . Systematic difference in the estimate of analgesic efficacy between dental and postsurgical pain models remains unproven , and , on balance , no major difference is likely
This approach has been design ed to provide adequate analgesia while minimizing exposure to adverse events
Background : Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has advantages over the open procedure for postoperative pain .
However , a systematic review of postoperative pain management in this procedure has not been conducted .