Several studies of good quality demonstrated changes in lifestyle habits arising from the provision of genetic interventions .
The most promising lifestyle changes were changes in nutrition .
Conclusions : It is possible to facilitate behaviour change using genetic testing as the catalyst .
Background : Study ing the impact of  genetic testing interventions on lifestyle behaviour change  has been a priority area of research in recent years .
Substantial heterogeneity exists in the results and conclusions of this literature , which has yet to be explained using vali date d behaviour change theory and an assessment of the quality of genetic interventions .
The theory of planned behaviour ( TPB ) helps to explain key contributors to behaviour change .
It has been hypothesized that personalization could be added to this theory to help predict changes in health behaviours .
Purpose : This systematic review provides a detailed , comprehensive identification , assessment , and summary of primary research articles pertaining to  lifestyle behaviour change  ( nutrition , physical activity , sleep , and smoking ) result ing from  genetic testing interventions .
The present review further aims to provide in-depth analyses of studies conducted to date within the context of the TPB and the quality of genetic interventions provided to participants while aim ing to determine whether or not genetic testing facilitates changes in lifestyle habits .
This review is timely in light of a recently published “ call-to-action ” paper , highlighting the need to incorporate the TPB into personalized healthcare behaviour change research .
Disclosure of Genetic Information and Change in Dietary Intake: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Background Proponents of consumer genetic tests cl aim that the information can positively impact health behaviors and aid in chronic disease prevention . However , the effects of disclosing genetic information on dietary intake behavior are not clear . Methods A double-blinded , parallel group , 2∶1 online r and omized controlled trial was conducted to determine the short- and long-term effects of disclosing nutrition-related genetic information for personalized nutrition on dietary intakes of caffeine , vitamin C , added sugars , and sodium . Participants were healthy men and women aged 20–35 years ( n = 138 ) . The intervention group ( n = 92 ) received personalized DNA-based dietary advice for 12-months and the control group ( n = 46 ) received general dietary recommendations with no genetic information for 12-months .  Food frequency question naires were collected at baseline and 3- and 12-months after the intervention to assess dietary intakes . General linear models were used to compare changes in intakes between those receiving general dietary advice and those receiving DNA-based dietary advice . Results Compared to the control group , no significant changes to dietary intakes of the nutrients were observed at 3-months . At 12-months , participants in the intervention group who possessed a risk version of the ACE gene , and were advised to limit their sodium intake , significantly reduced their sodium intake ( mg/day ) compared to the control group ( −287.3±114.1 vs. 129.8±118.2 , p = 0.008 ) . Those who had the non-risk version of ACE did not significantly change their sodium intake compared to the control group ( 12-months : −244.2±150.2 , p = 0.11 ) . Among those with the risk version of the ACE gene , the proportion who met the targeted recommendation of 1500 mg/day increased from 19 % at baseline to 34 % after 12 months ( p = 0.06 ) . Conclusions These findings demonstrate that disclosing genetic information for personalized nutrition results in greater changes in intake for some dietary components compared to general population -based dietary advice . Trial Registration Clinical Trials.gov
Several studies of good quality demonstrated changes in lifestyle habits arising from the provision of genetic interventions .
The most promising lifestyle changes were changes in nutrition .
Conclusions : It is possible to facilitate behaviour change using genetic testing as the catalyst .
Background : Study ing the impact of  genetic testing interventions on lifestyle behaviour change  has been a priority area of research in recent years .
Substantial heterogeneity exists in the results and conclusions of this literature , which has yet to be explained using vali date d behaviour change theory and an assessment of the quality of genetic interventions .
The theory of planned behaviour ( TPB ) helps to explain key contributors to behaviour change .
It has been hypothesized that personalization could be added to this theory to help predict changes in health behaviours .
Purpose : This systematic review provides a detailed , comprehensive identification , assessment , and summary of primary research articles pertaining to  lifestyle behaviour change  ( nutrition , physical activity , sleep , and smoking ) result ing from  genetic testing interventions .
The present review further aims to provide in-depth analyses of studies conducted to date within the context of the TPB and the quality of genetic interventions provided to participants while aim ing to determine whether or not genetic testing facilitates changes in lifestyle habits .
This review is timely in light of a recently published “ call-to-action ” paper , highlighting the need to incorporate the TPB into personalized healthcare behaviour change research .