We found high quality evidence that hormone therapy in both primary and secondary prevention conferred no protective effects for all-cause mortality , cardiovascular death , non-fatal myocardial infa rct ion , angina , or revascularisation .
There was no strong evidence of effect on risk of stroke in this group .
Our review findings provide strong evidence that treatment with hormone therapy in post-menopausal women overall , for either primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease events has little if any benefit and causes an increase in the risk of stroke and venous thromboembolic events
BACKGROUND Evidence from systematic review s of observational studies suggests that hormone therapy may have beneficial effects in reducing the incidence of cardiovascular disease events in post-menopausal women , however the results of r and omised controlled trials ( RCTs ) have had mixed results .
This is an up date d version of a Cochrane review published in 2013 .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of hormone therapy for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in post-menopausal women , and whether there are differential effects between use in primary or secondary prevention .
Secondary aims were to undertake exploratory analyses to ( i ) assess the impact of time since menopause that treatment was commenced ( ≥ 10 years versus < 10 years ) , and where these data were not available , use age of trial participants at baseline as a proxy ( ≥ 60 years of age versus < 60 years of age ) ; and ( ii ) assess the effects of length of time on treatment .
Postmenopausal hormone therapy and risk of cardiovascular disease by age and years since menopause.
CONTEXT The timing of initiation of hormone therapy may influence its effect on  cardiovascular disease .  OBJECTIVE To explore whether the effects of hormone therapy on risk of cardiovascular disease vary by age or years since menopause began . DESIGN , SETTING , AND PARTICIPANTS Secondary analysis of the Women 's Health Initiative ( WHI ) r and omized controlled trials of hormone therapy in which 10,739 postmenopausal women who had undergone a hysterectomy were r and omized to conjugated equine estrogens ( CEE ) or placebo and  16,608 postmenopausal women who had not had a hysterectomy  were r and omized to CEE plus medroxyprogesterone acetate ( CEE + MPA ) or placebo .  Women aged 50 to 79 years were recruited to the study from 40 US clinical centers between September 1993 and October 1998 . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Statistical test for trend of the effect of hormone therapy on coronary heart disease ( CHD ) and stroke across categories of age and years since menopause in the combined trials . RESULTS In the combined trials , there were 396 cases of CHD and 327 cases of stroke in the hormone therapy group vs 370 [ corrected ] cases of CHD and 239 cases of stroke in the placebo group . For women with less than 10 years since menopause began , the hazard ratio ( HR ) for CHD was 0.76 ( 95 % confidence interval [ CI ] , 0.50 - 1.16 ) ; 10 to 19 years , 1.10 ( 95 % CI , 0.84 - 1.45 ) ; and 20 or more years , 1.28 ( 95 % CI , 1.03 - 1.58 ) ( P for trend = .02 ) . The estimated absolute excess risk for CHD for women within 10 years of menopause was -6 per 10,000 person-years ; for women 10 to 19 years since menopause began , 4 per 10,000 person-years ; and for women 20 or more years from menopause onset , 17 per 10,000 person-years . For the age group of 50 to 59 years , the HR for CHD was 0.93 ( 95 % CI , 0.65 - 1.33 ) and the absolute excess risk was -2 per 10,000 person-years ; 60 to 69 years , 0.98 ( 95 % CI , 0.79 - 1.21 ) and -1 per 10,000 person-years ; and 70 to 79 years , 1.26 ( 95 % CI , 1.00 - 1.59 ) and 19 per 10,000 person-years ( P for trend = .16 ) . Hormone therapy increased the risk of stroke ( HR , 1.32 ; 95 % CI , 1.12 - 1.56 ) . Risk did not vary significantly by age or time since menopause . There was a nonsignificant tendency for the effects of hormone therapy on total mortality to be more favorable in younger than older women ( HR of 0.70 for 50 - 59 years ; 1.05 for 60 - 69 years , and 1.14 for 70 - 79 years ; P for trend = .06 ) . CONCLUSIONS Women who initiated hormone therapy closer to menopause tended to have reduced CHD risk compared with the increase in CHD risk among women more distant from menopause , but this trend test did not meet our criterion for statistical significance . A similar nonsignificant trend was observed for total mortality but the risk of stroke was elevated regardless of years since menopause . These data should be considered in regard to the short-term treatment of menopausal symptoms . TRIAL REGISTRATION clinical trials.gov Identifier : NCT00000611
We found high quality evidence that hormone therapy in both primary and secondary prevention conferred no protective effects for all-cause mortality , cardiovascular death , non-fatal myocardial infa rct ion , angina , or revascularisation .
There was no strong evidence of effect on risk of stroke in this group .
Our review findings provide strong evidence that treatment with hormone therapy in post-menopausal women overall , for either primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease events has little if any benefit and causes an increase in the risk of stroke and venous thromboembolic events
BACKGROUND Evidence from systematic review s of observational studies suggests that hormone therapy may have beneficial effects in reducing the incidence of cardiovascular disease events in post-menopausal women , however the results of r and omised controlled trials ( RCTs ) have had mixed results .
This is an up date d version of a Cochrane review published in 2013 .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of hormone therapy for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in post-menopausal women , and whether there are differential effects between use in primary or secondary prevention .
Secondary aims were to undertake exploratory analyses to ( i ) assess the impact of time since menopause that treatment was commenced ( ≥ 10 years versus < 10 years ) , and where these data were not available , use age of trial participants at baseline as a proxy ( ≥ 60 years of age versus < 60 years of age ) ; and ( ii ) assess the effects of length of time on treatment .