In relatively healthy women , combined continuous HT significantly increased the risk of venous thrombo-embolism or coronary event ( after one year 's use ) , stroke ( after three years ) , breast cancer and gallbladder disease .
Long-term oestrogen-only HT significantly increased the risk of venous thrombo-embolism , stroke and gallbladder disease ( after one to two years , three years and seven years ' use respectively ) , but did not significantly increase the risk of breast cancer .
The only statistically significant benefits of HT were a decreased incidence of fractures and ( for combined HT ) colon cancer , with long-term use .
Among women aged over 65 who were relatively healthy ( i.e. generally fit , without overt disease ) and taking continuous combined HT , there was a statistically significant increase in the incidence of dementia .
Among women with cardiovascular disease , long-term use of combined continuous HT significantly increased the risk of venous thrombo-embolism .
AUTHORS ' CONCLUSIONS HT is not indicated for the routine management of chronic disease .
We need more evidence on the safety of HT for menopausal symptom control , though short-term use appears to be relatively safe for healthy younger women
BACKGROUND Hormone therapy ( HT ) is widely used for controlling menopausal symptoms and has also been used for the management and prevention of cardiovascular disease , osteoporosis and dementia in older women .
This is an up date d version of the original Cochrane review first published in 2005 .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effect of long-term HT on mortality , cardiovascular outcomes , cancer , gallbladder disease , cognition , fractures and quality of life .
Prior hormone therapy and breast cancer risk in the Women's Health Initiative randomized trial of estrogen plus progestin.
OBJECTIVES To assess the extent to which prior hormone therapy modifies the breast cancer risk found with estrogen plus progestin ( E+P ) in the Women 's Health Initiative ( WHI ) r and omized trial . METHODS Subgroup analyses of prior hormone use on  invasive breast cancer incidence in 16,608 postmenopausal women in the WHI r and omized trial of E+P over an average 5.6 years of follow-up . RESULTS Small but statistically significant differences were found between prior HT users and non-users for most breast cancer risk factors but Gail risk scores were similar . Duration of E+P use within the trial ( mean 4.4 years , S.D. 2.0 ) did not vary by prior use . Among 4311 prior users , the adjusted hazard ratio ( HR ) for E+P versus placebo was 1.96 ( 95 % confidence interval [ CI ] : 1.17 - 3.27 ) , significantly different ( p=0.03 ) from that among 12,297 never users ( HR 1.02 ; 95 % CI : 0.77 - 1.36 ) . The interaction between study arm and follow-up time was significant overall ( p=0.01 ) and among never users ( p=0.02 ) but not among prior users ( p=0.10 ) . The cumulative incidence over time for the E+P and placebo groups appeared to cross after about 3 years in prior users , and after about 5 years in women with no prior use . No interaction was found with duration ( p=0.08 ) or recency of prior use ( p=0.17 ) . Prior hormone use significantly increased the E+P hazard ratio for larger , more advanced tumors . CONCLUSION A safe interval for combined hormone use could not be reliably defined with these data . However , the significant increase in breast cancer risk in the trial overall after only 5.6 years of follow-up , initially concentrated in women with prior hormone exposure , but with increasing risk over time in women without prior exposure , suggests that duration s only slightly longer than those in the WHI trial are associated with increased risk of breast cancer . Longer-term exposure and follow-up data are needed
In relatively healthy women , combined continuous HT significantly increased the risk of venous thrombo-embolism or coronary event ( after one year 's use ) , stroke ( after three years ) , breast cancer and gallbladder disease .
Long-term oestrogen-only HT significantly increased the risk of venous thrombo-embolism , stroke and gallbladder disease ( after one to two years , three years and seven years ' use respectively ) , but did not significantly increase the risk of breast cancer .
The only statistically significant benefits of HT were a decreased incidence of fractures and ( for combined HT ) colon cancer , with long-term use .
Among women aged over 65 who were relatively healthy ( i.e. generally fit , without overt disease ) and taking continuous combined HT , there was a statistically significant increase in the incidence of dementia .
Among women with cardiovascular disease , long-term use of combined continuous HT significantly increased the risk of venous thrombo-embolism .
AUTHORS ' CONCLUSIONS HT is not indicated for the routine management of chronic disease .
We need more evidence on the safety of HT for menopausal symptom control , though short-term use appears to be relatively safe for healthy younger women
BACKGROUND Hormone therapy ( HT ) is widely used for controlling menopausal symptoms and has also been used for the management and prevention of cardiovascular disease , osteoporosis and dementia in older women .
This is an up date d version of the original Cochrane review first published in 2005 .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effect of long-term HT on mortality , cardiovascular outcomes , cancer , gallbladder disease , cognition , fractures and quality of life .