Conclusion Rotary instrumentation shows equivalent cleaning efficiency than h and files depending on the system of instrumentation and techniques used .
However , use of rotary in primary teeth leads to improved shaping of canals providing better quality of treatment in less time .
Aim To develop a scientifically current and evidence based protocol on the efficacy of rotary and h and root canal instrumentation in primary teeth .
How to cite this article Panchal V , Jeevan and an G , et al. Comparison between the Effectiveness of Rotary and Manual Instrumentation in Primary Teeth : A Systematic Review .
Comparison of the cleaning capacity of Mtwo and Pro Taper rotary systems and manual instruments in primary teeth
Background : Root canal cleaning is an important step in endodontic therapy . In order to develop better techniques , a new generation of endodontic instruments has been design ed . The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of manual K-files ( Mani Co , Tokyo , Japan ) and two rotary systems – Mtwo ( Dentsply-Maillefer , Ballaigues , Switzerl and ) and ProTaper ( VDW , Munich , Germany)–for root canal preparation in primary molars . Material s and Methods : India ink was injected to 160 mesiobuccal and distal root canals of m and ibular primary molars . The teeth were r and omly divided into three experimental groups and one control group . In each experimental group , either manual instruments ( K-files ) or rotary instruments ( Mtwo or ProTaper ) were used to prepare root canals . After cleaning the canals and clearing the teeth , ink removal was evaluated with a stereomicroscope . Statistical analysis was done with Kruskal – Wallis and Friedman tests . Results : There were no significant differences in cleaning efficiency between manual and rotary instruments . Only ProTaper files performed significantly better in the coronal and middle thirds than in the apical third of the root canal . Conclusion : Manual K-files and the Mtwo and ProTaper rotary systems showed equally acceptable cleaning ability in primary molar root canals
Conclusion Rotary instrumentation shows equivalent cleaning efficiency than h and files depending on the system of instrumentation and techniques used .
However , use of rotary in primary teeth leads to improved shaping of canals providing better quality of treatment in less time .
Aim To develop a scientifically current and evidence based protocol on the efficacy of rotary and h and root canal instrumentation in primary teeth .
How to cite this article Panchal V , Jeevan and an G , et al. Comparison between the Effectiveness of Rotary and Manual Instrumentation in Primary Teeth : A Systematic Review .