Educational interventions did not seem to have a positive impact on HbA1c , systolic blood pressure or lipid profiles .
The use of telemedicine , clinician reminders and feedback showed mixed results but there was a level of consistency in improvement in HbA1c when multifaceted interventions on multidisciplinary teams were implemented .
Targeting general or family physicians was largely ineffective in improving the cardiovascular risk factors considered , except when using a computer application on insulin h and ling of type 2 diabetes or customised simulated cases with feedbacks .
Similarly , interventions targeting nurses did not improve outcomes compared to st and ard care .
Multifaceted professional interventions were more effective than single interventions targeting single primary or community care professionals in improving glycaemic control
OBJECTIVE To review the interventions targeting primary care or community based professionals on glycaemic and cardiovascular risk factor control in people with diabetes .
Effectiveness of a community health worker intervention among African American and Latino adults with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial.
OBJECTIVES We tested the effectiveness of a culturally tailored , behavioral theory-based community health worker intervention for improving glycemic control . METHODS We used a r and omized , 6-month delayed control group design among 164 African American and Latino adult participants recruited from 2 health systems in Detroit , Michigan . Our study was guided by the principles of community-based participatory research . Hemoglobin A1c ( HbA1c ) level was the primary outcome measure . Using an empowerment-based approach , community health workers provided participants with diabetes self-management education and regular home visits , and accompanied them to a clinic visit during the 6-month intervention period . RESULTS Participants in the intervention group had a mean HbA1c value of 8.6 % at baseline , which improved to a value of 7.8 % at 6 months , for an adjusted change of -0.8 percentage points ( P < .01 ) . There was no change in mean HbA1c among the control group ( 8.5 % ) . Intervention participants also had significantly greater improvements in self-reported diabetes underst and ing compared with the control group . CONCLUSIONS This study contributes to the growing evidence for the effectiveness of community health workers and their role in multidisciplinary teams engaged in culturally appropriate health care delivery
Educational interventions did not seem to have a positive impact on HbA1c , systolic blood pressure or lipid profiles .
The use of telemedicine , clinician reminders and feedback showed mixed results but there was a level of consistency in improvement in HbA1c when multifaceted interventions on multidisciplinary teams were implemented .
Targeting general or family physicians was largely ineffective in improving the cardiovascular risk factors considered , except when using a computer application on insulin h and ling of type 2 diabetes or customised simulated cases with feedbacks .
Similarly , interventions targeting nurses did not improve outcomes compared to st and ard care .
Multifaceted professional interventions were more effective than single interventions targeting single primary or community care professionals in improving glycaemic control
OBJECTIVE To review the interventions targeting primary care or community based professionals on glycaemic and cardiovascular risk factor control in people with diabetes .