On the basis of this review , available scientific data suggest that the administration of currently evaluated probiotic- and /or prebiotic-supplemented formula to healthy infants does not raise safety concerns with regard to growth and adverse effects .
Infant formulae are increasingly supplemented with probiotics , prebiotics , or synbiotics despite uncertainties regarding their efficacy .
The present article , developed by the Committee on Nutrition of the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology , Hepatology , and Nutrition , systematic ally review s published evidence related to the safety and health effects of the administration of formulae supplemented with probiotics and /or prebiotics compared with unsupplemented formulae .
The effect of a prebiotic supplemented formula on growth and stool microbiology of term infants.
BACKGROUND The intestinal flora of breast-fed infants is generally dominated by bifidobacteria which have beneficial properties . Their presence is due to various compounds of breast milk including prebiotic substances . AIM This prospect i ve , double blind , study compared the growth , acceptability and the proportion of bifidobacteria and clostridia in the stool flora of bottle-fed infants r and omized to receive a formula with a specific mixture of 0.4 g/100 ml prebiotic galacto- and long-chain fructooligosaccharides or the same formula without added prebiotics . METHODS Within 0 - 14 days after birth at term , healthy bottle-fed infants were enrolled to receive either a prebiotic formula or a st and ard formula . At recruitment anthropometric measurements were done . These were repeated at the age of 6 and 12 weeks . Stool sample s were taken at inclusion and at the age of 6 weeks . The number of bifidobacteria and clostridia was determined by fluorescent in situ hybridization . RESULTS There was good tolerance of the prebiotic formula . Somatic growth was similar in the two groups . Stool frequency was significantly higher in the prebiotic group ( P=0.031 ) . Infants in the prebiotic group had also softer stools as compared to the control group ( P=0.026 ) . Baseline values of microorganisms at study entry were similar . The percentage of faecal clostridia at the completion of the study was significantly lower in the prebiotic group ( P=0.042 ) , while the proportion of faecal bifidobacteria was higher in the prebiotic group as compared to the control group . However this difference did not reach statistical significance ( P=0.262 ) . The percentage of E. coli was lower in the prebiotic group but again this did not reach statistical significance ( P=0.312 ) . CONCLUSION An infant formula containing prebiotic oligosaccharides is well tolerated , leads to normal somatic growth and suppresses the numbers of clostridia in the faeces with a trend for higher percentage of stool bifidobacteria and lower percentage of E. coli
On the basis of this review , available scientific data suggest that the administration of currently evaluated probiotic- and /or prebiotic-supplemented formula to healthy infants does not raise safety concerns with regard to growth and adverse effects .
Infant formulae are increasingly supplemented with probiotics , prebiotics , or synbiotics despite uncertainties regarding their efficacy .
The present article , developed by the Committee on Nutrition of the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology , Hepatology , and Nutrition , systematic ally review s published evidence related to the safety and health effects of the administration of formulae supplemented with probiotics and /or prebiotics compared with unsupplemented formulae .