Women taking HT had a significantly decreased incidence of fracture with long-term use .
Research ers found no strong evidence that HT has a clinical ly meaningful impact on the incidence of colorectal cancer .
AUTHORS ' CONCLUSIONS : Women with intolerable menopausal symptoms may wish to weigh the benefits of symptom relief against the small absolute risk of harm arising from short-term use of low-dose HT , provided they do not have specific contraindications .
HT may be unsuitable for some women , including those at increased risk of cardiovascular disease , increased risk of thromboembolic disease ( such as those with obesity or a history of venous thrombosis ) or increased risk of some types of cancer ( such as breast cancer , in women with a uterus ) .
The risk of endometrial cancer among women with a uterus taking oestrogen-only HT is well documented .
HT is not indicated for primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease or dementia , nor for prevention of deterioration of cognitive function in postmenopausal women .
Although HT is considered effective for the prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis , it is generally recommended as an option only for women at significant risk for whom non-oestrogen therapies are unsuitable .
BACKGROUND : Hormone therapy ( HT ) is widely provided for control of menopausal symptoms and has been used for the management and prevention of cardiovascular disease , osteoporosis and  dementia in older women .
This is an up date d version of a Cochrane review first published in 2005 .
OBJECTIVES : To assess effects of long-term HT ( at least 1 year 's duration ) on mortality , cardiovascular outcomes , cancer , gallbladder disease , fracture and cognition in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women during and after cessation of treatment .
Results from the Estonian postmenopausal hormone therapy trial [ISRCTN35338757].
OBJECTIVES At present the Women 's Health Initiative trial is the only reported r and omised controlled trial study ing the effects of hormone therapy among healthy postmenopausal women . The Women 's Health Initiative reports have been criticized for lacking in generalisability , due to the characteristics of the trial population . We aim ed to compare the health effects of oral continuous combined hormone therapy with a placebo and non-treatment among healthy Estonian women . METHODS Eligible women were r and omised into a blind group of hormone therapy versus placebo and into a non-blind group of open label hormone therapy versus non-treatment .  One thous and seven hundred and seventy-eight postmenopausal women aged 50 - 64 at the time of sampling were recruited in 1999 - 2001 at three clinical centers in Estonia . Participants received conjugated equine oestrogens , 0.625 mg/d , plus medroxyprogesterone acetate , 2.5mg/d , or conjugated equine oestrogens , 0.625 mg/d , plus medroxyprogesterone acetate , 5mg/d , if less than 3 years had passed since menopause at recruitment , or matched placebo or non-treatment . Trial treatment was stopped gradually from 1 January 2004 to 31 May 2004 . RESULTS After a follow-up period from 2.0 to 5.0 years the combined hazard ratio , stratified by blinding and adjusted for age at recruitment and former oral contraceptive use was 1.12 ( 95 % confidence interval [ CI ] : 0.90 - 1.40 ) for coronary heart disease , 1.24 ( 95 % CI : 0.85 - 1.82 ) for cerebrovascular disease , 1.36 ( 95 % CI : 0.73 - 2.52 ) for total cancer , and 0.61 ( 95 % CI : 0.42 to 0.89 ) for bone fractures . CONCLUSIONS The results from the Estonian Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy r and omised trial are consistent with the Women 's Health Initiative findings
Women taking HT had a significantly decreased incidence of fracture with long-term use .
Research ers found no strong evidence that HT has a clinical ly meaningful impact on the incidence of colorectal cancer .
AUTHORS ' CONCLUSIONS : Women with intolerable menopausal symptoms may wish to weigh the benefits of symptom relief against the small absolute risk of harm arising from short-term use of low-dose HT , provided they do not have specific contraindications .
HT may be unsuitable for some women , including those at increased risk of cardiovascular disease , increased risk of thromboembolic disease ( such as those with obesity or a history of venous thrombosis ) or increased risk of some types of cancer ( such as breast cancer , in women with a uterus ) .
The risk of endometrial cancer among women with a uterus taking oestrogen-only HT is well documented .
HT is not indicated for primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease or dementia , nor for prevention of deterioration of cognitive function in postmenopausal women .
Although HT is considered effective for the prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis , it is generally recommended as an option only for women at significant risk for whom non-oestrogen therapies are unsuitable .
BACKGROUND : Hormone therapy ( HT ) is widely provided for control of menopausal symptoms and has been used for the management and prevention of cardiovascular disease , osteoporosis and  dementia in older women .
This is an up date d version of a Cochrane review first published in 2005 .
OBJECTIVES : To assess effects of long-term HT ( at least 1 year 's duration ) on mortality , cardiovascular outcomes , cancer , gallbladder disease , fracture and cognition in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women during and after cessation of treatment .