D. Restoration of sinus rhythm for monophasic vs. biphasic waveforms .
Another study showed that PVI result ed in long-term restoration
Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is a major public health problem in the United States .
More than 2.3 million Americans are estimated to have AF ( 1 ) .
The known association between AF and substantial mortality , morbidity , and health care costs compounds the effect of this condition .
Not only is the risk for death in patients with AF twice that of patients without it , but AF can result in myocardial ischemia and infa rct ion , exacerbate heart failure ( HF ) , and cause tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy if the ventricular rate is not well-controlled ( 25 ) .
The most dreaded complication of AF is thromboembolism , especially stroke ( 6 ) .
In some patients , AF or therapies to manage this condition can severely depreciate quality of life ( 710 ) .
Furthermore , the management of AF and its complications is responsible for nearly $ 16 billion in additional costs to the U.S. health care system per year ( 11 ) .
We conducted this systematic review to evaluate the comparative safety and effectiveness of rate- versus rhythm-control strategies ;  medications used for ventricular rate control ; strict versus more lenient rate-control strategies ; nonpharmacologic rate-control therapies  versus medications ; electrical cardioversion and antiarrhythmic medications  for restoration of sinus rhythm ;  and  catheter ablation , surgical ablation , and antiarrhythmic medications  for maintenance of sinus rhythm .
Randomized Ablation Strategies for the Treatment of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: RASTA Study
Background — The single-procedure efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) is less than optimal in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation ( AF ) . Adjunctive techniques have been developed to enhance single-procedure efficacy in these patients . We conducted a study to compare 3 ablation strategies in patients with persistent AF . Methods and Results — Subjects were r and omized as follows : arm 1 , PVI + ablation of non-PV triggers identified using a stimulation protocol ( st and ard approach ) ; arm 2 , st and ard approach + empirical ablation at common non-PV AF trigger sites ( mitral annulus , fossa ovalis , eustachian ridge , crista terminalis , and superior vena cava ) ; or arm 3 , st and ard approach + ablation of left atrial complex fractionated electrogram sites . Patients were seen at 6 weeks , 6 months , and 1 year ; transtelephonic monitoring was performed at each visit . Antiarrhythmic drugs were discontinued at 3 to 6 months . The primary study end point was freedom from atrial arrhythmias off antiarrhythmic drugs at 1 year after a single-ablation procedure . A total of 156 patients ( aged 59±9 years ; 136 males ; AF duration , 47±50 months ) participated ( arm 1 , 55 patients ; arm 2 , 50 patients ; arm 3 , 51 patients ) . Procedural outcomes ( procedure , fluoroscopy , and PVI times ) were comparable between the 3 arms . More lesions were required to target non-PV trigger sites than a complex fractionated electrogram ( 33±9 versus 22±9 ; P<0.001 ) . The primary end point was achieved in 71 patients and was worse in arm 3 ( 29 % ) compared with arm 1 ( 49 % ; P=0.04 ) and arm 2 ( 58 % ; P=0.004 ) . Conclusions — These data suggest that additional substrate modification beyond PVI does not improve single-procedure efficacy in patients with persistent AF . Clinical Trial Registration — URL : http://www . clinical trials.gov . Unique identifier : NCT00379301
D. Restoration of sinus rhythm for monophasic vs. biphasic waveforms .
Another study showed that PVI result ed in long-term restoration
Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is a major public health problem in the United States .
More than 2.3 million Americans are estimated to have AF ( 1 ) .
The known association between AF and substantial mortality , morbidity , and health care costs compounds the effect of this condition .
Not only is the risk for death in patients with AF twice that of patients without it , but AF can result in myocardial ischemia and infa rct ion , exacerbate heart failure ( HF ) , and cause tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy if the ventricular rate is not well-controlled ( 25 ) .
The most dreaded complication of AF is thromboembolism , especially stroke ( 6 ) .
In some patients , AF or therapies to manage this condition can severely depreciate quality of life ( 710 ) .
Furthermore , the management of AF and its complications is responsible for nearly $ 16 billion in additional costs to the U.S. health care system per year ( 11 ) .
We conducted this systematic review to evaluate the comparative safety and effectiveness of rate- versus rhythm-control strategies ;  medications used for ventricular rate control ; strict versus more lenient rate-control strategies ; nonpharmacologic rate-control therapies  versus medications ; electrical cardioversion and antiarrhythmic medications  for restoration of sinus rhythm ;  and  catheter ablation , surgical ablation , and antiarrhythmic medications  for maintenance of sinus rhythm .