We did not find any differences between PSI and SI with respect to any other parameters .
Conclusions PSI  has advantages in axial alignment of the femoral component , operative time , and perioperative blood loss relative to SI .
No significant differences were found between PSI and SI with respect to alignment of the remaining components , number of outliers , or length of hospital stay .
Purpose The purpose of the present study was to compare patient-specific instrumentation ( PSI ) with st and ard instrumentation ( SI ) in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty ( TKA ) .
PSI is hypothesized to have advantages with respect to component alignment ; number of outliers ( defined as alignment > 3 ° from the target alignment ) ; operative time ; perioperative blood loss ; and length of hospital stay .
This new surgical technique is expected to exhibit superior performance .
Rotational alignment of femoral component between custom cutting block and conventional technique in total knee arthroplasty.
OBJECTIVE Rotation of femoral components could be optimized to improve function and durability of the knee joint . The purpose of the present study was to assess rotational alignment of femoral component comparing between CT-based , custom cutting blocks and the contemporary total knee arthroplasty , instrument technique . MATERIAL AND METHOD The prospect i ve control study of 80 patients underwent total knee arthroplasty by using PFC Sigma PS total knee design . Rotation offemoral component was analyzed in all patients using postoperative CT scan .  Forty patients were perfonned on by using CT-based , patient-specific cutting blocks with femoral rotational axis relative to transepicondylar axis while forty patients were performed on by using contemporaly instrumentation with alignment at 3 degrees external rotation from posterior condylar line . The rotation of the femoral component with external rotation ofmore than 3 degrees or internal rotation was considered outlier . RESULTS There was no statistically significant difference among ages , gender ; BMI , pre-operative mechanical axis between the two groups . There were eleven outliers in conventional group ( range , 5 degrees ofexternal rotation to 3 degrees of internal rotation ) , three femoral components were in excessive external rotation with the angle of more than 3 degrees and eight femnoral components were in internal rotation . In contrast with custom cutting block group was no outliers offemoral rotation . The average rotational alignment was 1.040 + /- 0.62 external rotation from epicondylar axis in custom cutting group and 1.58 + /- 1.750 in contemporary group . CONCLUSION Custom cutting , block technique significantly reduced the outlier of the femoral component rotation and aided in positioning of the femoral component in optimal alignment . The improvement of femoral rotation showed no difference in clinical outcome between the two groups
We did not find any differences between PSI and SI with respect to any other parameters .
Conclusions PSI  has advantages in axial alignment of the femoral component , operative time , and perioperative blood loss relative to SI .
No significant differences were found between PSI and SI with respect to alignment of the remaining components , number of outliers , or length of hospital stay .
Purpose The purpose of the present study was to compare patient-specific instrumentation ( PSI ) with st and ard instrumentation ( SI ) in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty ( TKA ) .
PSI is hypothesized to have advantages with respect to component alignment ; number of outliers ( defined as alignment > 3 ° from the target alignment ) ; operative time ; perioperative blood loss ; and length of hospital stay .
This new surgical technique is expected to exhibit superior performance .