None of the ergonomic interventions was more beneficial for any outcome measures when compared with another treatment or with no treatment or with placebo .
Behavioural interventions had inconsistent effects on pain and disability , with some subgroups showing benefit and others showing no significant improvement when compared with no treatment , minor intervention controls or other behavioural interventions .In the eight studies that evaluated various other interventions , there was no evidence of a clear beneficial effect of any of the interventions provided .
We found very low- quality evidence indicating that pain , recovery , disability and sick leave are similar after exercises when compared with no treatment , with minor intervention controls or with exercises provided as additional treatment to people with work-related complaints of the arm , neck or shoulder .
Low- quality evidence also showed that ergonomic interventions did not decrease pain at short-term follow-up but did decrease pain at long-term follow-up .
There was no evidence of an effect on other outcomes .
For behavioural and other interventions , there was no evidence of a consistent effect on any of the outcomes .
BACKGROUND Work-related upper limb disorder ( WRULD ) , repetitive strain injury ( RSI ) , occupational overuse syndrome ( OOS ) and work-related complaints of the arm , neck or shoulder ( CANS ) are the most frequently used umbrella terms for disorders that develop as a result of repetitive movements , awkward postures and impact of external forces such as those associated with operating vibrating tools .
Work-related CANS , which is the term we use in this review , severely hampers the working population .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of conservative interventions for work-related complaints of the arm , neck or shoulder ( CANS ) in adults on pain , function and work-related outcomes .
Health-related effects of worksite interventions involving physical exercise and reduced workhours.
OBJECTIVES This study examined the health-related effects of two worksite interventions , physical exercise and reduced workhours , on women employed in dentistry . METHODS Six workplaces were r and omized to one of the following three conditions : ( i ) 2.5 hours of weekly , m and atory physical exercise of middle-to-high intensity to be performed during workhours ( N=62 ) , ( ii ) a reduction of full-time weekly workhours from 40 to 37.5 hours ( N=50 ) , and ( iii ) reference . In all , 177 women participated . Biomarkers and self-ratings in question naires were obtained before the intervention ( T ( 1 ) ) , and six ( T ( 2 ) ) and 12 months ( T ( 3 ) ) after the intervention . RESULTS The results showed increased levels of physical activity and exercise in all of the groups , the level of physical exercise being significantly greater in the physical exercise group . Repeated- measures analyses of variance using data from T ( 1 ) and T (3)for biological measures and all three time points for self-ratings produced significant interaction effects for glucose , waist-to-hip ratio , and work ability and clear trends for general symptoms and upper-extremity disorders . Posthoc analyses showed that the results of the health-related measures differed between the interventions , decreased glucose and upper-extremity disorders in the exercise group , and increased high-density lipoprotein and waist-to-hip ratio among those working reduced hours . CONCLUSIONS These results show that the two interventions had small and varied effects on biomarkers and self-reports of different aspects of health among women . It is suggested that interventions involving a modest reduction in workhours seem to be more effective if these hours are used for physical exercise
None of the ergonomic interventions was more beneficial for any outcome measures when compared with another treatment or with no treatment or with placebo .
Behavioural interventions had inconsistent effects on pain and disability , with some subgroups showing benefit and others showing no significant improvement when compared with no treatment , minor intervention controls or other behavioural interventions .In the eight studies that evaluated various other interventions , there was no evidence of a clear beneficial effect of any of the interventions provided .
We found very low- quality evidence indicating that pain , recovery , disability and sick leave are similar after exercises when compared with no treatment , with minor intervention controls or with exercises provided as additional treatment to people with work-related complaints of the arm , neck or shoulder .
Low- quality evidence also showed that ergonomic interventions did not decrease pain at short-term follow-up but did decrease pain at long-term follow-up .
There was no evidence of an effect on other outcomes .
For behavioural and other interventions , there was no evidence of a consistent effect on any of the outcomes .
BACKGROUND Work-related upper limb disorder ( WRULD ) , repetitive strain injury ( RSI ) , occupational overuse syndrome ( OOS ) and work-related complaints of the arm , neck or shoulder ( CANS ) are the most frequently used umbrella terms for disorders that develop as a result of repetitive movements , awkward postures and impact of external forces such as those associated with operating vibrating tools .
Work-related CANS , which is the term we use in this review , severely hampers the working population .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of conservative interventions for work-related complaints of the arm , neck or shoulder ( CANS ) in adults on pain , function and work-related outcomes .