On the CGI-I scale , the analysis revealed that MPH was more effective than ATX and GXR .
For any adverse events , RBX ( 89 % ) was the safest alternative .
Network meta- analysis offered a broader overview on the available treatments for ADHD , especially for safety issues , and contributes towards evidence gathering and clinical practice decisions .
The aim of this study is to gather evidence of head-to-head double-blind r and omized-controlled trials on the efficacy and safety of available treatments for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder ( ADHD ) in children and adolescents .
Selegiline in comparison with methylphenidate in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder children and adolescents in a double-blind, randomized clinical trial.
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to examine the selegiline treatment compared to methylpheni date ( MPH ) in children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder ( ADHD ) . METHOD Forty subjects , aged 6 - 15 years , boys and girls , who were diagnosed as having ADHD , using the criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders- Fourth Edition ( DSM-IV ) , were r and omly assigned to receive either selegiline or MPH for 60 days . Treatment outcomes were assessed using the Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Scale ( ADHS ) administered at baseline and on days 14 , 28 , 42 , and 60 following the commencement of treatment . Side effects were also rated . RESULTS There were no significant differences between sex , age , weight , and ethnicity of participants in the 2 groups . Both groups showed a significant improvement over the 60 days of treatment result ing from the teachers ' and parents ' ADHS scores across the treatment . CONCLUSION Following the trial , MPH did not effect greater mean improvement as a result of the parents ' or teachers ' ADHS scores than selegiline . Thus , selegiline appears to be effective and well tolerated for ADHD in children and adolescents
On the CGI-I scale , the analysis revealed that MPH was more effective than ATX and GXR .
For any adverse events , RBX ( 89 % ) was the safest alternative .
Network meta- analysis offered a broader overview on the available treatments for ADHD , especially for safety issues , and contributes towards evidence gathering and clinical practice decisions .
The aim of this study is to gather evidence of head-to-head double-blind r and omized-controlled trials on the efficacy and safety of available treatments for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder ( ADHD ) in children and adolescents .