Conclusions : The probability for success for EMS proved to be significantly greater than the probability for success for RES , providing best available evidence on the influence of cavity preparation with ultrasonic tips and /or SuperEBA ( Keystone Industries , Gibbstown , NJ ) , IRM ( Dentsply Sirona , York , PA ) , MTA , or silicate cements as root‐end filling material instead of a shallow cavity preparation and placement of a resin‐based material .
HIGHLIGHTSEndodontic microsurgery ( EMS ) with the use of high‐magnification ultrasonic root‐end preparation and root‐end filling with SuperEBA , IRM , MTA , or other calcium silicate cements has a high probability of success .
Resin‐based endodontic surgery with the use of high‐magnification preparation of a shallow concave root‐end cavity with bonded resin‐based root‐end filling material performed less favorably than EMS
Introduction : The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of root‐end preparation and filling material on endodontic surgery outcome .
Effect of Platelet-rich Fibrin on Healing of Apicomarginal Defects: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
INTRODUCTION The purpose of this prospect i ve , r and omized controlled trial was to evaluate the healing outcomes of platelet-rich fibrin ( PRF ) in periapical surgeries involving apicomarginal defects and to compare these results with surgeries not using any guided tissue regeneration techniques . METHODS Thirty patients with suppurative chronic apical periodontitis and apicomarginal communication were r and omly assigned to either the PRF or the control group .  Clinical and radiographic parameters including pocket depth ( PD ) , clinical attachment level , gingival marginal position , size of periapical lesion , and percentage reduction of the periapical radiolucency were recorded at baseline and at an interval of 3 months for a period of 12 months . RESULTS The overall success rate was 83.33 % , with a success rate of 86.66 % ( 13 of 15 teeth ) for PRF group and 80 % ( 12 of 15 teeth ) for control group . Both the groups exhibited a significant reduction in PD , clinical attachment level , gingival marginal position , and size of periapical lesion at 12-month period . No significant differences were observed between the 2 groups for these parameters except PD , which showed a statistically significant reduction in the PRF group ( P < .05 ) . CONCLUSIONS The adjunctive use of regenerative techniques may not promote healing of apicomarginal defects of endodontic origin
Conclusions : The probability for success for EMS proved to be significantly greater than the probability for success for RES , providing best available evidence on the influence of cavity preparation with ultrasonic tips and /or SuperEBA ( Keystone Industries , Gibbstown , NJ ) , IRM ( Dentsply Sirona , York , PA ) , MTA , or silicate cements as root‐end filling material instead of a shallow cavity preparation and placement of a resin‐based material .
HIGHLIGHTSEndodontic microsurgery ( EMS ) with the use of high‐magnification ultrasonic root‐end preparation and root‐end filling with SuperEBA , IRM , MTA , or other calcium silicate cements has a high probability of success .
Resin‐based endodontic surgery with the use of high‐magnification preparation of a shallow concave root‐end cavity with bonded resin‐based root‐end filling material performed less favorably than EMS
Introduction : The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of root‐end preparation and filling material on endodontic surgery outcome .