There was no major difference in the rate of complications .
Conclusions Short-term recovery favors limited incision over st and ard incision THA .
Background The literature comparing  limited incision and st and ard incision THAs  is confusing regarding whether limited incision THA improves short-term recovery without compromising long-term durability and survival .
Further , previously published meta-analyses can not conclude that limited incision THA is better .
With new data , we seek to discover if the answers now exist .
Purpose We used meta- analysis to compare surgical and hospitalization data , clinical outcomes , and complication rates , and thus ( 1 ) confirm whether limited incision THA is at least comparable to st and ard incision THA ; and ( 2 ) determine whether limited incision THA is an improvement over st and ard incision THA .
Minimally-invasive total hip arthroplasty will improve early postoperative outcomes: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial
Background The rehabilitation of patients for total hip arthroplasty is unsatisfactory , especially the prolonged rehabilitation . Aims To explore indications and key points of anterolateral minimally-invasive total hip arthroplasty . Methods 110 patients admitted for unilateral total hip arthroplasty were r and omly selected for surgery with either anterolateral minimally-invasive incision or st and ard posterolateral incision .  Demographic data , perioperative index and postoperative function index were recorded and statistically analyzed . Results No significant difference was detected in operation time , abduction angle , anteversion angle , stem alignment and stem fixation . The incision length , blood loss , perioperative transfusion and 100-mm VAS score at the first 24 h in minimally-invasive group were significantly lower . The Harris hip score and Barthel index were significantly higher in minimally-invasive group at 3 months ’ follow-up , but not significantly different 3 years after operation . Conclusions There are fewer traumas , fewer blood losses and more rapid recovery in this approach
There was no major difference in the rate of complications .
Conclusions Short-term recovery favors limited incision over st and ard incision THA .
Background The literature comparing  limited incision and st and ard incision THAs  is confusing regarding whether limited incision THA improves short-term recovery without compromising long-term durability and survival .
Further , previously published meta-analyses can not conclude that limited incision THA is better .
With new data , we seek to discover if the answers now exist .
Purpose We used meta- analysis to compare surgical and hospitalization data , clinical outcomes , and complication rates , and thus ( 1 ) confirm whether limited incision THA is at least comparable to st and ard incision THA ; and ( 2 ) determine whether limited incision THA is an improvement over st and ard incision THA .