Results showed that mechanical active irrigation reduces post-operative pain .
It improved debridement , canal/isthmus cleanliness .
It also improved delivery of irrigant up to working length .
Bacterial count was more with active irrigation , though not significant .
There is no effect on long-term periapical healing .
Conclusion It may be concluded that mechanical active irrigation devices are beneficial in reducing post-operative pain and improving canal and isthmus cleanliness during Endodontics
Objective Irrigant activation has been cl aim ed to be beneficial in in vitro and clinical studies .
This systematic review aims to investigate the clinical efficiency of mechanically activated irrigants and conventional irrigation .
The efficacy of dynamic irrigation using a commercially available system (RinsEndo) determined by removal of a collagen 'bio-molecular film' from an ex vivo model.
AIM To compare the efficacy of three irrigation protocol s using an established ex vivo bio-molecular film model . METHODOLOGY Thirty human teeth with single straight canals were r and omly allocated to three groups [ static , manual-dynamic , automated-dynamic ( RinsEndo ] ; each with a sub-group ( n = 5 ) for needle position at 4 or 10 mm short of the working length ( WL ) . The root canals were prepared to apical size 40 , taper 0.08 . The teeth were split longitudinally into two halves and a st and ard coat of stained-collagen was applied to the canal surfaces . The re-assembled teeth were irrigated using one of the protocol s with the irrigation needle at one of two positions . Digital images of the canal surfaces , before and after irrigation with 18 mL of 2.5 % NaOCl , were used to score surface coverage with stained-collagen using image-analyses ( ipWin4 ) . The data were analysed using linear regression models . RESULTS The canal area covered with stained-collagen was significantly ( P < 0.001 ) less after dynamic irrigation ( manual/automated ) compared with static irrigation ; but automated-dynamic irrigation was significantly ( P = 0.037 ) less effective than manual-dynamic irrigation . The ' orientation of needle port ' , ' corono-apical level of canal ' and ' apical extent of needle placement ' were significant ( P < 0.001 ) factors influencing efficacy of irrigation . Residual collagen was most evident in the coronal third . Deeper penetration of the needle tip result ed in significantly ( P < 0.001 ) more effective collagen removal . CONCLUSIONS Automated-dynamic irrigation was significantly more effective ( 16 % ) than static irrigation but significantly less effective ( 5 % ) than manual-dynamic irrigation . Irrigation was more effective ( 7 % ) when the needle was placed closer to WL
Results showed that mechanical active irrigation reduces post-operative pain .
It improved debridement , canal/isthmus cleanliness .
It also improved delivery of irrigant up to working length .
Bacterial count was more with active irrigation , though not significant .
There is no effect on long-term periapical healing .
Conclusion It may be concluded that mechanical active irrigation devices are beneficial in reducing post-operative pain and improving canal and isthmus cleanliness during Endodontics
Objective Irrigant activation has been cl aim ed to be beneficial in in vitro and clinical studies .
This systematic review aims to investigate the clinical efficiency of mechanically activated irrigants and conventional irrigation .