Available trial data do not provide evidence that advancing enteral feed volumes at daily increments of 15 to 20 mL/kg ( compared with 30 to 40 mL/kg ) reduces the risk of NEC or death in very preterm or VLBW infants , extremely preterm or ELBW infants , SGA or growth-restricted infants , or infants with antenatal AREDFV .
Advancing the volume of enteral feeds at a slow rate results in several days of delay in establishing full enteral feeds and may increase the risk of invasive infection
BACKGROUND Early enteral feeding practice s are potentially modifiable risk factors for necrotising enterocolitis ( NEC ) in very preterm or very low birth weight ( VLBW ) infants .
Observational studies suggest that conservative feeding regimens , including slowly advancing enteral feed volumes , reduce the risk of NEC .
However , slow feed advancement may delay establishment of full enteral feeding and may be associated with metabolic and infectious morbidities secondary to prolonged exposure to parenteral nutrition .
OBJECTIVES To determine effects of slow rates of enteral feed advancement on the incidence of NEC , mortality , and other morbidities in very preterm or VLBW infants .
Slow versus rapid enteral feed in preterm neonates with antenatal absent end diastolic flow
Abstract Objective : Incidence of feed intolerance ( FI ) and necrotizing enterocolitis ( NEC ) in preterm neonates with Doppler evidence of absent end diastolic flow ( AEDF ) velocities in the fetal umbilical artery when enteral feed volumes were started by 6–72 h and advanced either slowly or rapidly . Methods : Stable inborn neonates , 30–36 weeks gestation , weighing ≥1000 g and with antenatal evidence of AEDF were included in this pilot study . Infants ( stratified in < 1250 g and ≥1250 g birth weight categories ) were allocated under r and omized controlled trial , to receive either slow or rapid advancement of enteral feeding , while initiating the feeds after 6 h of birth if bowel sounds were present . Primary outcome measure was , FI and NEC till day 7 after reaching full feeds . Results : Of 159 eligible infants , 83 were r and omized : 53 infants in the ≥1250 g category ( 28 in rapid and 25 in slow group ) and 30 in the < 1250 g category ( 15 in each group ) . FI was present in 11 % versus 16 % in ≥1250 g ( p = 0.570 ) and 27 % versus 33 % in < 1250 g ( p = 0.690 ) , NEC developed in 8.4 % ( 3 versus 1 ) in ≥1250 g and ( 1 versus 2 ) in < 1250 g , in slow versus rapid feeding . Conclusion : This trial did not find increase in incidence of feed intolerance with very early introduction and rapid advancement of enteral feeds in stable preterm neonates with AEDF and birth weight ≥1250
Available trial data do not provide evidence that advancing enteral feed volumes at daily increments of 15 to 20 mL/kg ( compared with 30 to 40 mL/kg ) reduces the risk of NEC or death in very preterm or VLBW infants , extremely preterm or ELBW infants , SGA or growth-restricted infants , or infants with antenatal AREDFV .
Advancing the volume of enteral feeds at a slow rate results in several days of delay in establishing full enteral feeds and may increase the risk of invasive infection
BACKGROUND Early enteral feeding practice s are potentially modifiable risk factors for necrotising enterocolitis ( NEC ) in very preterm or very low birth weight ( VLBW ) infants .
Observational studies suggest that conservative feeding regimens , including slowly advancing enteral feed volumes , reduce the risk of NEC .
However , slow feed advancement may delay establishment of full enteral feeding and may be associated with metabolic and infectious morbidities secondary to prolonged exposure to parenteral nutrition .
OBJECTIVES To determine effects of slow rates of enteral feed advancement on the incidence of NEC , mortality , and other morbidities in very preterm or VLBW infants .