REVIEW ER 'S CONCLUSIONS There is no evidence to support feeding with a hydrolysed formula for the prevention of allergy in preference to exclusive breast feeding .
In high risk infants who are unable to be completely breast fed , there is evidence that prolonged feeding with a hydrolysed compared to a cow 's milk formula reduces infant and childhood allergy and infant CMA .
BACKGROUND Allergies and food reactions are common and may be associated with foods including adapted cow 's milk formulas .
Formulas containing hydrolysed proteins have been used to treat infants with allergy or food intolerance , and have been advocated for prevention of allergy and food intolerance in infants .
OBJECTIVES To determine whether use of hydrolysed formulas for infant feeding prevents allergy and food intolerance .
If hydrolysed formulas are effective , to determine what type of hydrolysed formula is most effective including extensively and partially hydrolysed formulas .
To determine which infants benefit including infants at low or high risk of allergy and infants receiving early , short term or prolonged formula feeding .
Early diet of preterm infants and development of allergic or atopic disease: randomised prospective study.
OBJECTIVE --To study the effect of early diet on the development of allergic reactions in infants born preterm . DESIGN --Two r and omised prospect i ve trails . In trail A infants were r and omly allocated banked donor milk or preterm formula as their sole diet or ( separately r and omised ) as a supplement to their mother 's expressed breast milk . In trial B infants were allocated term or preterm formula . A blind follow up examination was done 18 months after the expected date of birth . SETTING --Neonatal units of hospitals in Cambridge , Ipswich , King 's Lynn , Norwich , and Sheffield . Outpatient follow up . PARTICIPANTS --777 Infants with a birth weight less than 1850 g born during 1982 to 1984 . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES --Development of eczema , allergic reactions to food or drugs , and asthma or wheezing by nine and 18 months after term . Whenever possible the observations were confirmed by rechallenge or clinical examination . RESULTS --At 18 months after term there was no difference in the incidence of allergic reactions between dietary groups in either trial . In the subgroup of infants with a family history of atopy , however , those in trial A who received preterm formula rather than human milk had a significantly greater risk of developing one or more allergic reactions ( notably eczema ) by 18 months ( odds ratio 3.6 ; 95 % confidence interval 1.4 to 9.1 ) . CONCLUSIONS --Feeding neonates on formulas based on cows ' milk , including those with a high protein content , did not increase the overall risk of allergy . Nevertheless , in the subgroup with a family history of atopy early exposure to cows ' milk increased the risk of a wide range of allergic reactions , especially eczema
REVIEW ER 'S CONCLUSIONS There is no evidence to support feeding with a hydrolysed formula for the prevention of allergy in preference to exclusive breast feeding .
In high risk infants who are unable to be completely breast fed , there is evidence that prolonged feeding with a hydrolysed compared to a cow 's milk formula reduces infant and childhood allergy and infant CMA .
BACKGROUND Allergies and food reactions are common and may be associated with foods including adapted cow 's milk formulas .
Formulas containing hydrolysed proteins have been used to treat infants with allergy or food intolerance , and have been advocated for prevention of allergy and food intolerance in infants .
OBJECTIVES To determine whether use of hydrolysed formulas for infant feeding prevents allergy and food intolerance .
If hydrolysed formulas are effective , to determine what type of hydrolysed formula is most effective including extensively and partially hydrolysed formulas .
To determine which infants benefit including infants at low or high risk of allergy and infants receiving early , short term or prolonged formula feeding .