At costs lower than $ 0.10 per pill , treating all persons with LDL cholesterol levels greater than 3.4 mmol/L ( > 130 mg/dL ) could be a better strategy .
Previous cost-effectiveness analyses ( 719 ) show that statin therapy is generally cost-effective for secondary prevention and for high-risk primary prevention but do not focus on population -level impact or average cost-effectiveness across the heterogeneous U.S. population , including such subgroups of patients as those with low risk but very high cholesterol levels .
Also , it is unclear whether the ATP III approach to risk stratification , in which risk is formally assessed only for patients with 2 or more established risk factors , is the simplest and most cost-effective way of targeting statin therapy .
The 2004 up date to ATP III ( 3 ) notes that treatment of high-risk subgroups may be useful even when cholesterol levels are low , which suggests that a more purely risk-based approach may be simpler and more cost-effective than the ATP III approach .
Context Which lipid-lowering policies with statins are cost-effective ?
Implication Optimum policies for lipid lowering with statins are highly dependent on statin costs .
The Editors Coronary heart disease ( CHD ) is the leading cause of death in the United States ( 1 ) .
Inhibitors of HMG-CoA reductase , known as statins , lower cholesterol and prevent CHD events and mortality ( 2 , 3 ) .
However , statins are expensive and sometimes cause side effects , which makes it difficult for patients , physicians , and policymakers to decide who should receive them .
The CHD Policy Model is a mathematical state-transition model of CHD in the United States that can be used to project event rates and costs related to CHD .
The West of Scotland coronary prevention study: economic benefit analysis of primary prevention with pravastatin
Abstract Objective : To estimate the economic efficiency of using pravastatin to prevent the transition from health to cardiovascular disease in men with hypercholesterolaemia . Design : Economic benefit analysis based on data from the West of Scotl and coronary prevention study . Treatment specific hazards of developing cardiovascular disease according to various definitions were estimated . Scottish record linkage data provided disease specific survival . Cost estimates were based on extracontractual tariffs and event specific average lengths of stay calculated from the West of Scotl and coronary prevention study . Subjects : Men with hypercholesterolaemia similar to the subjects in the West of Scotl and coronary prevention study . Main outcome : Cost consequences , the number of transitions from health to cardiovascular disease prevented , the number needed to start treatment , and cost per life year gained . Results : If 10 000 of these men started taking pravastatin  , 318 of them would not make the transition from health to cardiovascular disease ( number needed to treat , 31.4 ) , at a net discounted cost of £ 20 m over 5 years . These benefits imply an undiscounted gain of 2460 years of life , and thus £ 8121 per life year gained , or £ 20 375 per life year gained if benefits are discounted . Restriction to the 40 % of men at highest risk reduces the number needed to treat to 22.5 ( £ 5601 per life year gained ( undiscounted ) and £ 13 995 per life year gained ( discounted ) ) . Conclusions : In subjects without evidence of prior myocardial infa rct ion but who have hypercholesterolaemia , the use of pravastatin yields substantial health benefits at a cost that is not prohibitive overall and can be quite efficient in selected high risk subgroups . Key messages The West of Scotl and coronary prevention study showed that pravastatin can prevent cardiovascular disease in men with hypercholesterolaemia So far , reports have deemed this prevention unjustified due to adverse economic implication s This analysis , based on data from the West of Scotl and coronary prevention study and extensive data from the Scottish record linkage system , shows that using pravastatin in this way is worth considering because of its substantial clinical benefit at a reasonable cost Practitioners must now consider using pravastatin to prevent cardiovascular disease in men with hypercholesterolaemia Increased economic efficiency may be obtained by restricting prevention to patients with additional risk
At costs lower than $ 0.10 per pill , treating all persons with LDL cholesterol levels greater than 3.4 mmol/L ( > 130 mg/dL ) could be a better strategy .
Previous cost-effectiveness analyses ( 719 ) show that statin therapy is generally cost-effective for secondary prevention and for high-risk primary prevention but do not focus on population -level impact or average cost-effectiveness across the heterogeneous U.S. population , including such subgroups of patients as those with low risk but very high cholesterol levels .
Also , it is unclear whether the ATP III approach to risk stratification , in which risk is formally assessed only for patients with 2 or more established risk factors , is the simplest and most cost-effective way of targeting statin therapy .
The 2004 up date to ATP III ( 3 ) notes that treatment of high-risk subgroups may be useful even when cholesterol levels are low , which suggests that a more purely risk-based approach may be simpler and more cost-effective than the ATP III approach .
Context Which lipid-lowering policies with statins are cost-effective ?
Implication Optimum policies for lipid lowering with statins are highly dependent on statin costs .
The Editors Coronary heart disease ( CHD ) is the leading cause of death in the United States ( 1 ) .
Inhibitors of HMG-CoA reductase , known as statins , lower cholesterol and prevent CHD events and mortality ( 2 , 3 ) .
However , statins are expensive and sometimes cause side effects , which makes it difficult for patients , physicians , and policymakers to decide who should receive them .
The CHD Policy Model is a mathematical state-transition model of CHD in the United States that can be used to project event rates and costs related to CHD .