Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
Exercise for health: a randomized, controlled trial evaluating the impact of a pragmatic, translational exercise intervention on the quality of life, function and treatment-related side effects following breast cancer
Exercise for Health was a r and omized , controlled trial design ed to evaluate two modes of delivering ( face-to-face [ FtF ] and over-the-telephone [ Tel ] ) an 8-month translational exercise intervention , commencing 6-weeks post-breast cancer surgery ( PS ) . Outcomes included quality of life ( QoL ) , function ( fitness and upper body ) and treatment-related side effects ( fatigue , lymphoedema , body mass index , menopausal symptoms , anxiety , depression and pain ) . Generalised estimating equation modelling determined time ( baseline [ 5 weeks PS ] , mid-intervention [ 6 months PS ] , post-intervention [ 12 months PS ] ) , group ( FtF , Tel , Usual Care [ UC ] ) and time-by-group effects . 194 women representative of the breast cancer population were r and omised to the FtF ( n = 67 ) , Tel ( n = 67 ) and UC ( n = 60 ) groups . There were significant ( p < 0.05 ) interaction effects on QoL , fitness and fatigue with differences being observed between the treatment groups and the UC group . Trends observed for the treatment groups were similar . The treatment groups reported improved QoL , fitness and fatigue over time and changes observed between baseline and post-intervention were clinical ly relevant . In contrast , the UC group experienced no change , or worsening QoL , fitness and fatigue , mid-intervention . Although improvements in the UC group occurred by 12-months post-surgery , the change did not meet the clinical ly relevant threshold . There were no differences in other treatment-related side effects between groups . This translational intervention trial , delivered either FtF or Tel , supports exercise as a form of adjuvant breast cancer therapy that can prevent declines in fitness and function during treatment and optimise recovery post-treatment
Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?