Conclusions There is considerable variability in the type of measures utilized to measure physical impairments and limitations in survivors of critical illness .
Purpose To identify measures used to evaluate the broad constructs of functional impairment and limitations in the critically ill across the continuum of recovery , and to evaluate , synthesis e and compare the clinimetric properties of the measures identified .
Measuring change in disability after inpatient rehabilitation: comparison of the responsiveness of the Barthel Index and the Functional Independence Measure
BACKGROUND The importance of evaluating disability outcome measures is well recognised . The Functional Independence Measure ( FIM ) was developed to be a more comprehensive and “ sensitive ” measure of disability than the Barthel Index ( BI ) . Although the FIM is widely used and has been shown to be reliable and valid , there is limited information about its responsiveness , particularly in comparison with the BI . This study compares the appropriateness and responsiveness of these two disability measures in patients with multiple sclerosis and stroke . METHODS Patients with multiple sclerosis ( n=201 ) and poststroke ( n=82 ) patients undergoing inpatient neurorehabilitation  were studied . Admission and discharge scores were generated for the BI and the three scales of the FIM ( total , motor , and cognitive ) . Appropriateness of the measures to the study sample s was determined by examining score distributions , floor and ceiling effects . Responsiveness was determined using an effect size calculation . RESULTS The BI , FIM total , and FIM motor scales show good variability and have small floor and ceiling effects in the study sample s. The FIM cognitive scale showed a notable ceiling effect in patients with multiple sclerosis . Comparable effect sizes were found for the BI , and two FIM scales ( total and motor ) in both patients with multiple sclerosis and stroke patients . CONCLUSION All measures were appropriate to the study sample . The FIM cognitive scale , however , has limited usefulness as an outcome measure in progressive multiple sclerosis . The BI , FIM total , and FIM motor scales show similar responsiveness , suggesting that both the FIM total and FIM motor scales have no advantage over the BI in evaluating change
Conclusions There is considerable variability in the type of measures utilized to measure physical impairments and limitations in survivors of critical illness .
Purpose To identify measures used to evaluate the broad constructs of functional impairment and limitations in the critically ill across the continuum of recovery , and to evaluate , synthesis e and compare the clinimetric properties of the measures identified .