Basal levels of hormones were mostly normal in athletes with OTS/FOR/NFOR compared with healthy athletes .
Distinctly , stimulation tests , mainly performed in maximal exercise conditions , showed blunted GH and ACTH responses in OTS/FOR/NFOR athletes , whereas cortisol and plasma catecholamines showed conflicting findings and the other hormones responded normally .
Conclusion Basal hormone levels are not good predictor but blunted ACTH and GH responses to stimulation tests may be good predictors of OTS/FOR/NFOR
Background Overtraining syndrome ( OTS ) , functional ( FOR ) and non-functional overreaching ( NFOR ) are conditions diagnosed in athletes with decreased performance and fatigue , triggered by metabolic , immune , hormonal and other dysfunctions and result ed from an imbalance between training stress and proper recovery .
Despite previous descriptions , there is a lack of a review that discloses all hormonal findings in OTS/FOR/NFOR .
The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate whether and which roles hormones play in OTS/FOR/NFOR .
Monitoring for overreaching in rugby league players
The aim of this study was to identify indicators of non-functional overreaching ( NFOR ) in team sport athletes undertaking intensive training loads . Eighteen semi-professional rugby league players were r and omly assigned into two pair matched groups . One group completed 6 weeks of normal training ( NT ) whilst the other group was deliberately overreached through intensified training ( IT ) . Both groups then completed the same 7-day stepwise training load reduction taper . Multistage fitness test ( MSFT ) performance , $ $ \ifmmode\exp and after\dot\else\exp and after\.\fi{V}{\text{O}}_{{2\max } } $ $ , peak aerobic running velocity ( Vmax ) , maximal heart rate , vertical jump , 10-s cycle sprint performance and body mass were measured pre- and post-training period and following the taper . Hormonal , haematological and immunological parameters were also measured pre-training and following weeks 2 , 4 and 6 of training and post-taper . MANOVA for repeated measures with contrast analysis indicated that MSFT performance and $ $ \ifmmode\exp and after\dot\else\exp and after\.\fi{V}{\text{O}}_{{2\max } } $ $ were significantly reduced in the IT group over time and condition , indicating that a state of overreaching was attained . However , the only biochemical measure that was significantly different between the IT and NT group was the glutamine to glutamate ( Gln/Glu ) ratio even though testosterone , testosterone to cortisol ( T/C ) ratio , plasma glutamate , and CK activity were significantly changed after training in both groups . Positive endurance and power performance changes were observed post-taper in the IT group confirming NFOR . These changes were associated with increases in the T/C ratio and the Gln/Glu ratio and decreases in plasma glutamate and CK activity . These results indicate that although there was no single reliable biochemical marker of NFOR in these athletes , the Gln/Glu ratio and MSFT test may be useful measures for monitoring responses to IT in team sport athletes
Basal levels of hormones were mostly normal in athletes with OTS/FOR/NFOR compared with healthy athletes .
Distinctly , stimulation tests , mainly performed in maximal exercise conditions , showed blunted GH and ACTH responses in OTS/FOR/NFOR athletes , whereas cortisol and plasma catecholamines showed conflicting findings and the other hormones responded normally .
Conclusion Basal hormone levels are not good predictor but blunted ACTH and GH responses to stimulation tests may be good predictors of OTS/FOR/NFOR
Background Overtraining syndrome ( OTS ) , functional ( FOR ) and non-functional overreaching ( NFOR ) are conditions diagnosed in athletes with decreased performance and fatigue , triggered by metabolic , immune , hormonal and other dysfunctions and result ed from an imbalance between training stress and proper recovery .
Despite previous descriptions , there is a lack of a review that discloses all hormonal findings in OTS/FOR/NFOR .
The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate whether and which roles hormones play in OTS/FOR/NFOR .