The sensitivity and specificity of commonly implemented sideline assessment tools are generally good to very good , especially for symptom scores and cognitive evaluations performed within 48 hours of injury , and they are improved when a baseline evaluation is available for comparison .
CONTEXT The sideline assessment of concussion is challenging , given its variable presentations , the limited sensitivity and specificity of sideline assessment tools , and how the presentation of the injury evolves over time .
In addition , the diagnostic process , as well as the tools used to assess and manage concussion , continue to progress as research and what we know about concussion advance .
This paper focuses on the initial assessment on the sideline by review ing the concussion-evaluation literature , drawing from clinical experience to emphasize a st and ardized approach , and underscoring the importance of both familiarity with the athlete and clinical judgment .
OBJECTIVE To review the evidence regarding the clinical assessment of sport-related concussion on the sideline .
Additional considerations included making same-day return-to-play decisions , the sensitivity and specificity of sideline testing , and the importance of ongoing assessment and follow-up of injured athletes .
CONCLUSIONS The sideline assessment of sport-related concussion is challenging given the elusiveness and variability of presentation , reliance on athlete-reported symptoms , and the varying specificity and sensitivity values of sideline assessment tools .
In addition , the recognition of injury and assessment often occur in a time-pressured environment , requiring rapid disposition and decision making .
Adding Vision to Concussion Testing: A Prospective Study of Sideline Testing in Youth and Collegiate Athletes
Background : Sports-related concussion commonly affects the visual pathways . Current sideline protocol s test cognition and balance but do not include assessment s of visual performance . We investigated how adding a vision-based test of rapid number naming could increase our ability to identify concussed athletes on the sideline at youth and collegiate levels . Methods : Participants in this prospect i ve study included members of a youth ice hockey and lacrosse league and collegiate athletes from New York University and Long Isl and University . Athletes underwent preseason baseline assessment s using : 1 ) the King – Devick ( K-D ) test , a < 2-minute visual performance measure of rapid number naming , 2 ) the St and ardized Assessment of Concussion ( SAC ) , a test of cognition , and 3 ) a timed t and em gait test of balance .  The SAC and timed t and em gait are components of the currently used Sport Concussion Assessment Tool , 3rd Edition ( SCAT3 and Child-SCAT3 ) . In the event of a concussion during the athletic season , injured athletes were retested on the sideline/rink-side . Nonconcussed athletes were also assessed as control participants under the same testing conditions . Results : Among 243 youth ( mean age 11 ± 3 years , range 5–17 ) and 89 collegiate athletes ( age 20 ± 1 years , range 18–23 )  , baseline time scores for the K-D test were lower ( better ) with increasing participant age ( P < 0.001 , linear regression models ) . Among 12 athletes who sustained concussions during their athletic season , K-D scores worsened from baseline by an average of 5.2 seconds ; improvement by 6.4 seconds was noted for the nonconcussed controls ( n = 14 ) . The  vision-based K-D test  showed the greatest capacity to distinguish concussed vs control athletes based on changes from preseason baseline to postinjury ( receiver operating characteristic [ ROC ] curve areas from logistic regression models , accounting for age = 0.92 for K-D , 0.87 for timed t and em gait , and 0.68 for SAC ; P = 0.0004 for comparison of ROC curve areas ) . Conclusions : Adding a vision-based performance measure to cognitive and balance testing enhances the detection capabilities of current sideline concussion assessment . This observation in patients with mild traumatic brain injury reflects the common involvement and widespread distribution of brain pathways dedicated to vision
The sensitivity and specificity of commonly implemented sideline assessment tools are generally good to very good , especially for symptom scores and cognitive evaluations performed within 48 hours of injury , and they are improved when a baseline evaluation is available for comparison .
CONTEXT The sideline assessment of concussion is challenging , given its variable presentations , the limited sensitivity and specificity of sideline assessment tools , and how the presentation of the injury evolves over time .
In addition , the diagnostic process , as well as the tools used to assess and manage concussion , continue to progress as research and what we know about concussion advance .
This paper focuses on the initial assessment on the sideline by review ing the concussion-evaluation literature , drawing from clinical experience to emphasize a st and ardized approach , and underscoring the importance of both familiarity with the athlete and clinical judgment .
OBJECTIVE To review the evidence regarding the clinical assessment of sport-related concussion on the sideline .
Additional considerations included making same-day return-to-play decisions , the sensitivity and specificity of sideline testing , and the importance of ongoing assessment and follow-up of injured athletes .
CONCLUSIONS The sideline assessment of sport-related concussion is challenging given the elusiveness and variability of presentation , reliance on athlete-reported symptoms , and the varying specificity and sensitivity values of sideline assessment tools .
In addition , the recognition of injury and assessment often occur in a time-pressured environment , requiring rapid disposition and decision making .