Consistent evidence was found for the predictive value of pain intensity ( more pain-- > worse outcome ) , several work-related parameters ( e.g. , high satisfaction-- > better outcome ) , and coping style ( less active coping-- > better outcome ) .
Other sociodemographic and physical variables consistently lacked predictive value .
No consistent evidence was found for other psychological variables .
CONCLUSIONS It is impossible to define a generic set of predictors of outcome of multidisciplinary rehabilitation and back schools for patients with chronic low back pain because the review ed studies were descriptive or exploratory in nature , and most predictors were only studied once .
Nevertheless , for several predictors , consistent evidence was found .
OBJECTIVE To determine predictors of outcome of multidisciplinary rehabilitation-or back school treatment  for patients with chronic low back pain .
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Numerous review s have been performed to gain insight into which patients benefit from which treatment .
However , no review has systematic ally focused on predictors from multiple domains ( i.e. , sociodemographic , physical , and psychological ) , or on treatment outcome measured as activity limitation or participation restriction .
A randomized clinical trial of three active therapies for chronic low back pain.
STUDY DESIGN A r and omized clinical trial . OBJECTIVES To examine the relative efficacy of three active therapies for chronic low back pain . SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA There is much evidence documenting the efficacy of exercise in the conservative management of chronic low back pain , but many questions remain regarding its exact prescription and method of application . The most successful method must be identified to enable refinement of future rehabilitation programs to target the specific needs of the patient with chronic low back pain and the budget of the healthcare provider . METHODS One hundred forty-eight patients with chronic low back pain were r and omized to one of the following treatments , which they attended twice a week for 3 months : 1 ) modern active physiotherapy , 2 ) muscle reconditioning on training devices , or 3 ) low-impact aerobics . Pretherapy and posttherapy , objective measurements of lumbar mobility were performed , and question naires were administered inquiring about self-rated pain and disability , and psychosocial factors . Similar question naires were administered 6 months after therapy . The data were analyzed using the intention-to-treat principle . RESULTS Of the 148 patients , 16 ( 10.8 % ) dropped out of the therapy . One hundred thirty-seven question naires ( 93 % ) were available for analysis at all three time points . After therapy , significant reductions were observed in pain intensity , frequency , and disability ; Fear-Avoidance Beliefs about physical activity ( FABQactivity ) ; and " praying/hoping , " " catastrophizing , " and " pain behavior " coping strategies -- each with no group differences in the extent of the response . These effects were maintained over the subsequent 6 months , with the exception of disability and FABQactivity for the physiotherapy group . There were small but significant posttherapy increases in lumbar mobility , with aerobics and devices showing a greater response than physiotherapy . CONCLUSION The general lack of treatment specificity suggests that the main effects of the therapies were educed not through the reversal of physical weaknesses targeted by the corresponding exercise modality , but rather through some " central " effect , perhaps involving an adjustment of perception in relation to pain and disability . The direct costs associated with administering physiotherapy were three times as great , and devices four times as great , as those for aerobics . Administration of aerobics as an efficacious therapy for chronic low back pain has the potential to relieve some of the huge financial burden associated with the condition
Consistent evidence was found for the predictive value of pain intensity ( more pain-- > worse outcome ) , several work-related parameters ( e.g. , high satisfaction-- > better outcome ) , and coping style ( less active coping-- > better outcome ) .
Other sociodemographic and physical variables consistently lacked predictive value .
No consistent evidence was found for other psychological variables .
CONCLUSIONS It is impossible to define a generic set of predictors of outcome of multidisciplinary rehabilitation and back schools for patients with chronic low back pain because the review ed studies were descriptive or exploratory in nature , and most predictors were only studied once .
Nevertheless , for several predictors , consistent evidence was found .
OBJECTIVE To determine predictors of outcome of multidisciplinary rehabilitation-or back school treatment  for patients with chronic low back pain .
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Numerous review s have been performed to gain insight into which patients benefit from which treatment .
However , no review has systematic ally focused on predictors from multiple domains ( i.e. , sociodemographic , physical , and psychological ) , or on treatment outcome measured as activity limitation or participation restriction .