There is uncertainty whether current strategies for providing CVD risk scores  affect CVD events .
Providing CVD risk scores may slightly reduce CVD risk factor levels and may increase preventive medication prescribing in higher-risk people without evidence of harm .
BACKGROUND The current paradigm for cardiovascular disease ( CVD ) emphasises absolute risk assessment to guide treatment decisions in primary prevention .
Although the derivation and validation of multivariable risk assessment tools , or CVD risk scores , have attracted considerable attention , their effect on clinical outcomes is uncertain .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of evaluating and providing CVD risk scores in adults without prevalent CVD on cardiovascular outcomes , risk factor levels , preventive medication prescribing , and health behaviours .
Improved delivery of cardiovascular care (IDOCC) through outreach facilitation: study protocol and implementation details of a cluster randomized controlled trial in primary care
Background There is a need to find innovative approaches for translating best practice s for chronic disease care into daily primary care practice routines . Primary care plays a crucial role in the prevention and management of cardiovascular disease . There is , however , a substantive care gap , and many challenges exist in implementing evidence -based care . The Improved Delivery of Cardiovascular Care ( IDOCC ) project is a pragmatic trial design ed to improve the delivery of evidence -based care for the prevention and management of cardiovascular disease in primary care practice s using practice outreach facilitation . Methods The IDOCC project is a stepped-wedge cluster r and omized control trial in which Practice Outreach Facilitators work with primary care practice s to improve cardiovascular disease prevention and management for patients at highest risk . Primary care practice s in a large health region in Eastern Ontario , Canada , were eligible to participate . The intervention consists of regular monthly meetings with the Practice Outreach Facilitator over a one- to two-year period . Starting with audit and feedback , consensus building , and goal setting , the practice s are supported in changing practice behavior by incorporating chronic care model elements . These elements include ( a ) evidence -based decision support for providers , ( b ) delivery system re design for practice s , ( c ) enhanced self-management support tools provided to practice s to help them engage patients , and ( d ) increased community re source linkages for practice s to enhance referral of patients . The primary outcome is a composite score measured at the level of the patient to represent each practice 's adherence to evidence -based guidelines for cardiovascular care . Qualitative analysis of the Practice Outreach Facilitators ' written narratives of their ongoing practice interactions will be done . These textual analyses will add further insight into underst and ing critical factors impacting project implementation . Discussion This pragmatic , stepped-wedge r and omized controlled trial with both quantitative and process evaluations demonstrates innovative methods of implementing large-scale quality improvement and evidence -based approaches to care delivery . This is the first Canadian study to examine the impact of a large-scale multifaceted cardiovascular quality -improvement program in primary care . It is anticipated that through the evaluation of IDOCC , we will demonstrate an effective , practical , and sustainable means of improving the cardiovascular health of patients across Canada . Trial Registration Clinical Trials.gov :
There is uncertainty whether current strategies for providing CVD risk scores  affect CVD events .
Providing CVD risk scores may slightly reduce CVD risk factor levels and may increase preventive medication prescribing in higher-risk people without evidence of harm .
BACKGROUND The current paradigm for cardiovascular disease ( CVD ) emphasises absolute risk assessment to guide treatment decisions in primary prevention .
Although the derivation and validation of multivariable risk assessment tools , or CVD risk scores , have attracted considerable attention , their effect on clinical outcomes is uncertain .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of evaluating and providing CVD risk scores in adults without prevalent CVD on cardiovascular outcomes , risk factor levels , preventive medication prescribing , and health behaviours .