We found high quality evidence that hormone therapy in both primary and secondary prevention conferred no protective effects for all-cause mortality , cardiovascular death , non-fatal myocardial infa rct ion , angina , or revascularisation .
There was no strong evidence of effect on risk of stroke in this group .
Our review findings provide strong evidence that treatment with hormone therapy in post-menopausal women overall , for either primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease events has little if any benefit and causes an increase in the risk of stroke and venous thromboembolic events
BACKGROUND Evidence from systematic review s of observational studies suggests that hormone therapy may have beneficial effects in reducing the incidence of cardiovascular disease events in post-menopausal women , however the results of r and omised controlled trials ( RCTs ) have had mixed results .
This is an up date d version of a Cochrane review published in 2013 .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of hormone therapy for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in post-menopausal women , and whether there are differential effects between use in primary or secondary prevention .
Secondary aims were to undertake exploratory analyses to ( i ) assess the impact of time since menopause that treatment was commenced ( ≥ 10 years versus < 10 years ) , and where these data were not available , use age of trial participants at baseline as a proxy ( ≥ 60 years of age versus < 60 years of age ) ; and ( ii ) assess the effects of length of time on treatment .
Cardiovascular disease outcomes during 6.8 years of hormone therapy: Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study follow-up (HERS II).
CONTEXT The Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study ( HERS ) found no overall reduction in risk of coronary heart disease ( CHD ) events among postmenopausal women with CHD . However , in the hormone group , findings did suggest a higher risk of CHD events during the first year , and a decreased risk during years 3 to 5 . OBJECTIVE To determine if the risk reduction observed in the later years of HERS persisted and result ed in an overall reduced risk of CHD events with additional years of follow-up . DESIGN AND SETTING R and omized , blinded , placebo-controlled trial of 4.1 years ' duration ( HERS ) and subsequent unblinded follow-up for 2.7 years ( HERS II ) conducted at outpatient and community setting s at 20 US clinical centers . PARTICIPANTS A total of 2763 postmenopausal women with CHD and average age of 67 years at enrollment in HERS ; 2321 women ( 93 % of those surviving ) consented to follow-up in HERS II . INTERVENTION Participants were r and omly assigned to receive 0.625 mg/d of conjugated estrogens and 2.5 mg of medroxyprogesterone acetate ( n = 1380 ) , or placebo ( n = 1383 ) during HERS ; open-label hormone therapy was prescribed at personal physicians ' discretion during HERS II . The proportions with at least 80 % adherence to hormones declined from 81 % ( year 1 ) to 45 % ( year 6 ) in the hormone group , and increased from 0 % ( year 1 ) to 8 % ( year 6 ) in the placebo group . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was nonfatal myocardial infa rct ion and CHD death . Secondary cardiovascular events were coronary revascularization , hospitalization for unstable angina or congestive heart failure , nonfatal ventricular arrhythmia , sudden death , stroke or transient ischemic attack , and peripheral arterial disease . RESULTS There were no significant decreases in rates of primary CHD events or secondary cardiovascular events among women assigned to the hormone group compared with the placebo group in HERS , HERS II , or overall . The unadjusted relative hazard ( RH ) for CHD events in HERS was 0.99 ( 95 % confidence interval [ CI ] , 0.81 - 1.22 ) ; HERS II , 1.00 ( 95 % CI , 0.77 - 1.29 ) ; and overall , 0.99 ( 0.84 - 1.17 ) . The overall RHs were similar after adjustment for potential confounders and differential use of statins between treatment groups ( RH , 0.97 ; 95 % CI , 0.82 - 1.14 ) , and in analyses restricted to women who were adherent to r and omized treatment assignment ( RH , 0.96 ; 95 % CI , 0.77 - 1.19 ) . CONCLUSIONS Lower rates of CHD events among women in the hormone group in the final years of HERS did not persist during additional years of follow-up . After 6.8 years , hormone therapy did not reduce risk of cardiovascular events in women with CHD . Postmenopausal hormone therapy should not be used to reduce risk for CHD events in women with CHD
We found high quality evidence that hormone therapy in both primary and secondary prevention conferred no protective effects for all-cause mortality , cardiovascular death , non-fatal myocardial infa rct ion , angina , or revascularisation .
There was no strong evidence of effect on risk of stroke in this group .
Our review findings provide strong evidence that treatment with hormone therapy in post-menopausal women overall , for either primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease events has little if any benefit and causes an increase in the risk of stroke and venous thromboembolic events
BACKGROUND Evidence from systematic review s of observational studies suggests that hormone therapy may have beneficial effects in reducing the incidence of cardiovascular disease events in post-menopausal women , however the results of r and omised controlled trials ( RCTs ) have had mixed results .
This is an up date d version of a Cochrane review published in 2013 .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of hormone therapy for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in post-menopausal women , and whether there are differential effects between use in primary or secondary prevention .
Secondary aims were to undertake exploratory analyses to ( i ) assess the impact of time since menopause that treatment was commenced ( ≥ 10 years versus < 10 years ) , and where these data were not available , use age of trial participants at baseline as a proxy ( ≥ 60 years of age versus < 60 years of age ) ; and ( ii ) assess the effects of length of time on treatment .