The evidence available from r and omised controlled trials suggested that delaying the introduction of progressive enteral feeds beyond four days after birth did not reduce the risk of developing NEC in very preterm or VLBW infants , including growth-restricted infants .
Delaying the introduction of progressive enteral feeds result ed in a few days ' delay in establishing full enteral feeds but the clinical importance of this effect was unclear .
BACKGROUND The introduction of enteral feeds for very preterm ( less than 32 weeks ' gestation ) or very low birth weight ( VLBW ; less than 1500 g ) infants is often delayed for several days or longer after birth due to concern that early introduction may not be tolerated and may increase the risk of necrotising enterocolitis ( NEC ) .
However , delaying enteral feeding could diminish the functional adaptation of the gastrointestinal tract and prolong the need for parenteral nutrition with its attendant infectious and metabolic risks .
OBJECTIVES To determine the effect of delayed introduction of progressive enteral feeds on the incidence of NEC , mortality and other morbidities in very preterm or VLBW infants .
Early enteral feeding and nosocomial sepsis in very low birthweight infants
Background : The interrelations between early enteral feeding , necrotising enterocolitis ( NEC ) , and nosocomial sepsis ( NS ) remain unclear . Objective : To evaluate the effect of age at the introduction of enteral feeding on the incidence of NS and NEC in very low birthweight ( VLBW < 1500 g ) infants . Methods : Data were collected on the pattern of enteral feeding  and perinatal and neonatal morbidity on all VLBW infants born in one centre during 1995–2001 .  Enteral feeding was compared between infants with and without NS and /or NEC . Results : The study sample included 385 infants . Of these , 163 ( 42 % ) developed NS and 35 ( 9 % ) developed NEC .  Enteral feeding was started at a significantly earlier mean ( SD ) age in infants who did not develop nosocomial sepsis ( 2.8 ( 2.6 ) v 4.8 ( 3.7 ) days , p = 0.0001 ) . Enteral feeding was introduced at the same age in babies who did or did not develop NEC ( 3.1 ( 2 ) v 3.7 ( 3 ) days , p = 0.28 ) . Over the study period , the mean annual age at the start of enteral feeding fell consistently , and this correlated with the mean annual incidence of NS ( r2 = 0.891 , p = 0.007 ) . Multiple logistic regression analysis showed age at start of enteral feeding , respiratory distress syndrome , and birth weight to be the most significant predictors of risk of NS ( p = 0.0005 , p = 0.024 , p = 0.011 ) . Conclusions : Early enteral feeding was associated with a reduced risk of NS but no change in the risk of NEC  in VLBW infants . These findings support the use of early enteral feeding in this high risk population , but this needs to be confirmed in a large r and omised controlled trial
The evidence available from r and omised controlled trials suggested that delaying the introduction of progressive enteral feeds beyond four days after birth did not reduce the risk of developing NEC in very preterm or VLBW infants , including growth-restricted infants .
Delaying the introduction of progressive enteral feeds result ed in a few days ' delay in establishing full enteral feeds but the clinical importance of this effect was unclear .
BACKGROUND The introduction of enteral feeds for very preterm ( less than 32 weeks ' gestation ) or very low birth weight ( VLBW ; less than 1500 g ) infants is often delayed for several days or longer after birth due to concern that early introduction may not be tolerated and may increase the risk of necrotising enterocolitis ( NEC ) .
However , delaying enteral feeding could diminish the functional adaptation of the gastrointestinal tract and prolong the need for parenteral nutrition with its attendant infectious and metabolic risks .
OBJECTIVES To determine the effect of delayed introduction of progressive enteral feeds on the incidence of NEC , mortality and other morbidities in very preterm or VLBW infants .