Limited data suggest that systematic risk assessment for CVD has no statistically significant effects on clinical endpoints .
There is limited evidence to suggest that CVD systematic risk assessment may have some favourable effects on cardiovascular risk factors .
BACKGROUND Screening programmes can potentially identify people at high cardiovascular risk and reduce cardiovascular disease ( CVD ) morbidity and mortality .
However , there is currently not enough evidence showing clear clinical or economic benefits of systematic screening-like programmes over the widely practised opportunistic risk assessment of CVD in primary care setting s. OBJECTIVES The primary objective of this review was to assess the effectiveness , costs and adverse effects of systematic risk assessment compared to opportunistic risk assessment for the primary prevention of CVD .
Effects of an assessment of needs for medical and social services on long-term mortality: a randomized controlled study.
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to investigate the long-term effects of one general health screening on mortality . METHOD After stratification and r and omization of a population of 450,000 inhabitants , two groups were formed , an  intervention group of 3064 people and a control group of 29,122 people .  From the National Cause of Death Register , data were collected as regards death and causes of deaths for 1970 - 1990 . RESULTS Multivariate analysis was used to correct for known confounders . We then found no differences between the groups regarding deaths from all causes , cardiovascular diseases , cancer or accidents and poisoning . CONCLUSIONS One general health screening seems to have little , if any value in preventing fatal diseases
Limited data suggest that systematic risk assessment for CVD has no statistically significant effects on clinical endpoints .
There is limited evidence to suggest that CVD systematic risk assessment may have some favourable effects on cardiovascular risk factors .
BACKGROUND Screening programmes can potentially identify people at high cardiovascular risk and reduce cardiovascular disease ( CVD ) morbidity and mortality .
However , there is currently not enough evidence showing clear clinical or economic benefits of systematic screening-like programmes over the widely practised opportunistic risk assessment of CVD in primary care setting s. OBJECTIVES The primary objective of this review was to assess the effectiveness , costs and adverse effects of systematic risk assessment compared to opportunistic risk assessment for the primary prevention of CVD .