D. Restoration of sinus rhythm for monophasic vs. biphasic waveforms .
Another study showed that PVI result ed in long-term restoration
Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is a major public health problem in the United States .
More than 2.3 million Americans are estimated to have AF ( 1 ) .
The known association between AF and substantial mortality , morbidity , and health care costs compounds the effect of this condition .
Not only is the risk for death in patients with AF twice that of patients without it , but AF can result in myocardial ischemia and infa rct ion , exacerbate heart failure ( HF ) , and cause tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy if the ventricular rate is not well-controlled ( 25 ) .
The most dreaded complication of AF is thromboembolism , especially stroke ( 6 ) .
In some patients , AF or therapies to manage this condition can severely depreciate quality of life ( 710 ) .
Furthermore , the management of AF and its complications is responsible for nearly $ 16 billion in additional costs to the U.S. health care system per year ( 11 ) .
We conducted this systematic review to evaluate the comparative safety and effectiveness of rate- versus rhythm-control strategies ;  medications used for ventricular rate control ; strict versus more lenient rate-control strategies ; nonpharmacologic rate-control therapies  versus medications ; electrical cardioversion and antiarrhythmic medications  for restoration of sinus rhythm ;  and  catheter ablation , surgical ablation , and antiarrhythmic medications  for maintenance of sinus rhythm .
Catheter Ablation Versus Antiarrhythmic Drugs for Atrial Fibrillation: The A4 Study
Background — The mainstay of treatment for atrial fibrillation ( AF ) remains pharmacological ; however , catheter ablation has increasingly been used over the last decade . The relative merits of each strategy have not been extensively studied . Methods and Results — We conducted a r and omized multicenter comparison of these 2 treatment strategies in patients with paroxysmal AF resistant to at least 1 antiarrhythmic drug . The primary end point was absence of recurrent AF between months 3 and 12 , absence of recurrent AF after up to 3 ablation procedures , or changes in antiarrhythmic drugs during the first 3 months . Ablation consisted of pulmonary vein isolation in all cases , whereas additional extrapulmonary vein lesions were at the discretion of the physician . Crossover was permitted at 3 months in case of failure . Echocardiographic data , symptom score , exercise capacity , quality of life , and AF burden were evaluated at 3 , 6 , and 12 months by the supervising committee . Of 149 eligible patients , 112 ( 18 women [ 16 % ] ; age , 51.1±11.1 years ) were enrolled and r and omized to ablation ( n=53 ) or “ new ” antiarrhythmic drugs alone or in combination ( n=59 ) . Crossover from the antiarrhythmic drugs and ablation groups occurred in 37 ( 63 % ) and 5 patients ( 9 % ) , respectively ( P=0.0001 ) . At the 1-year follow-up , 13 of 55 patients ( 23 % ) and 46 of 52 patients ( 89 % ) had no recurrence of AF in the antiarrhythmic drug and ablation groups , respectively ( P<0.0001 ) . Symptom score , exercise capacity , and quality of life were significantly higher in the ablation group . Conclusion — This r and omized multicenter study demonstrates the superiority of catheter ablation over antiarrhythmic drugs in patients with AF with regard to maintenance of sinus rhythm and improvement in symptoms , exercise capacity , and quality of life
D. Restoration of sinus rhythm for monophasic vs. biphasic waveforms .
Another study showed that PVI result ed in long-term restoration
Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is a major public health problem in the United States .
More than 2.3 million Americans are estimated to have AF ( 1 ) .
The known association between AF and substantial mortality , morbidity , and health care costs compounds the effect of this condition .
Not only is the risk for death in patients with AF twice that of patients without it , but AF can result in myocardial ischemia and infa rct ion , exacerbate heart failure ( HF ) , and cause tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy if the ventricular rate is not well-controlled ( 25 ) .
The most dreaded complication of AF is thromboembolism , especially stroke ( 6 ) .
In some patients , AF or therapies to manage this condition can severely depreciate quality of life ( 710 ) .
Furthermore , the management of AF and its complications is responsible for nearly $ 16 billion in additional costs to the U.S. health care system per year ( 11 ) .
We conducted this systematic review to evaluate the comparative safety and effectiveness of rate- versus rhythm-control strategies ;  medications used for ventricular rate control ; strict versus more lenient rate-control strategies ; nonpharmacologic rate-control therapies  versus medications ; electrical cardioversion and antiarrhythmic medications  for restoration of sinus rhythm ;  and  catheter ablation , surgical ablation , and antiarrhythmic medications  for maintenance of sinus rhythm .