Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
Exercise effects on adipokines and the IGF axis in men with prostate cancer treated with androgen deprivation: A randomized study.
BACKGROUND And rogen deprivation therapy ( ADT ) has significant deleterious effects on body composition that may be accompanied by unfavourable changes in adipokine levels . While exercise has been shown to improve a number of side effects associated with ADT for prostate cancer , no studies have assessed the effect of exercise on adiponectin and leptin levels , which have been shown to alter the mitogenic environment . METHODS Twenty-six men with prostate cancer treated with ADT were r and omized to home-based aerobic exercise training or resistance exercise training for 24 weeks . Adiponectin , leptin , insulin-like growth factor 1 ( IGF-1 ) , insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 ( IGFBP-3 ) were analyzed by ELISA ( enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay ) , in addition to physical activity volume , peak aerobic capacity , and anthropometric measurements , at baseline , 3 months and 6 months . RESULTS Resistance exercise significantly reduced IGF-1 after 3 months ( p = 0.019 ) ; however , this change was not maintained at 6 months . At 6 months , IGFBP-3 was significantly increased compared to baseline for the resistance training group ( p = 0.044 ) . In an exploratory analysis of all exercisers , favourable changes in body composition and aerobic fitness were correlated with favourable levels of leptin , and favourable leptin : adiponectin and IGF-1:IGFBP-3 ratios at 3 and 6 months . CONCLUSIONS Home-based exercise is correlated with positive changes in adipokine levels and the IGF-axis that may be related to healthy changes in physical fitness and body composition . While the improvements of adipokine markers appear to be more apparent with resistance training compared to aerobic exercise , these findings must be considered cautiously and require replication from larger r and omized controlled trials to clarify the role of exercise on adipokines and IGF-axis proteins for men with prostate cancer
Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?