RESULTS Application of the Oral Health Impact Profile ( OHIP ) demonstrated that disease of pulpal origin affects quality of life with moderate severity , primarily through physical pain and psychological discomfort , and that RCT results in broad improvement of quality of life .
Satisfaction with RCT is extremely high , but cost is the primary reason for dissatisfaction .
Anxiety and fear affect RCT patients , profoundly influencing their behaviors , including treatment avoidance , and their pain experience .
Fear of pain is " fair " to " very much " prior to RCT .
Pain is widely feared , disliked , and remembered ; however , disease of pulpal origin generally produces moderate , but not severe pain .
RCT causes a dramatic decrease in pain prevalence and severity over the week following treatment .
Survival rates of teeth after RCT are very high ; complication rates are low .
Cost is a barrier to RCT , but initial costs , lifetime costs , cost effectiveness , cost utility , and cost benefit all compare extremely well to the alternatives involving replacement using implants or fixed prostheses .
INTRODUCTION Root canal treatment ( RCT ) success criteria inform us of the path to bony healing and of prognostic factors , but tell little about how the patient perceives , feels , or values RCT .
Patients choose , undergo , and pay for RCT , they live with the result , and inform their community .
The purpose of this narrative review was to appraise patient-centered outcomes of initial non-surgical RCT and nonsurgical retreatment , in adults .
A prospective study of the factors affecting outcomes of non-surgical root canal treatment: part 2: tooth survival.
AIM To investigate the probability of and factors influencing tooth survival  following primary ( 1 ° RCT x ) or secondary ( 2 ° RCT x ) root canal treatment .  METHODOLOGY This prospect i ve study involved annual follow-up of 2 ( 100 % ) to 4 years ( 50 % ) of 1 ° RCT x ( 759 teeth , 572 patients ) and 2 ° RCT x ( 858 teeth , 642 patients ) carried out by Endodontic postgraduate students . Pre- , intra- and post-operative data were collected prospect ively from consented patients . Information about extraction of the root filled tooth was sought from the patient , the referring dentist or derived from the patient 's records and included the timing and reasons for extraction . Tooth survival was estimated and prognostic factors were investigated using Cox regression . Clustering effects within patients were adjusted in all models using robust st and ard error . RESULTS The 4-year cumulative tooth survival following 1 ° RCT x [ 95.4 % ( 93.6 % , 96.8 % ) ] or 2 ° RCT x [ 95.3 % ( 93.6 % , 96.5 % ) ] was similar . Thirteen prognostic factors were identified . Significant patient factors included history of diabetes and systemic steroid therapy . Significant pre-operative factors included narrow but deep periodontal probing depth ; pain ; discharging sinus ; and iatrogenic perforation ( for 2 ° RCT x cases only ) . Significant intra-operative factors included iatrogenic perforation ; patency at apical terminus ; and extrusion of root fillings . Significant post-operative restorative factors included  presence of cast restoration versus temporary restoration ; presence of cast post and core ; proximal contacts with both mesial and distal adjacent teeth ; and terminal location of the tooth . The presence of pre-operative pain had a profound effect on tooth loss within the first 22 months after treatment [ hazard ratio ( HR ) = 3.1 ; P = 0.001 ] with a lesser effect beyond 22 months ( HR = 2.4 ; P = 0.01 ) . Patency at the apical terminus reduced tooth loss ( HR = 0.3 ; P < 0.01 ) within the first 22 months after treatment but had no significant effect on tooth survival beyond 22 months . Extrusion of gutta-percha root filling did not have any effect on tooth survival ( HR = 1.1 ; P = 0.2 ) within the first 22 months but significantly increased the hazard of tooth loss beyond 22 months ( HR = 3.0 ; P = 0.003 ) . CONCLUSIONS The 4-year tooth survival following primary or secondary root canal treatment was 95 % , with thirteen prognostic factors common to both
RESULTS Application of the Oral Health Impact Profile ( OHIP ) demonstrated that disease of pulpal origin affects quality of life with moderate severity , primarily through physical pain and psychological discomfort , and that RCT results in broad improvement of quality of life .
Satisfaction with RCT is extremely high , but cost is the primary reason for dissatisfaction .
Anxiety and fear affect RCT patients , profoundly influencing their behaviors , including treatment avoidance , and their pain experience .
Fear of pain is " fair " to " very much " prior to RCT .
Pain is widely feared , disliked , and remembered ; however , disease of pulpal origin generally produces moderate , but not severe pain .
RCT causes a dramatic decrease in pain prevalence and severity over the week following treatment .
Survival rates of teeth after RCT are very high ; complication rates are low .
Cost is a barrier to RCT , but initial costs , lifetime costs , cost effectiveness , cost utility , and cost benefit all compare extremely well to the alternatives involving replacement using implants or fixed prostheses .
INTRODUCTION Root canal treatment ( RCT ) success criteria inform us of the path to bony healing and of prognostic factors , but tell little about how the patient perceives , feels , or values RCT .
Patients choose , undergo , and pay for RCT , they live with the result , and inform their community .
The purpose of this narrative review was to appraise patient-centered outcomes of initial non-surgical RCT and nonsurgical retreatment , in adults .