This result was not influenced by the dose of dipyridamole or type of presenting vascular disease .
For patients who presented with arterial vascular disease , there was no evidence that dipyridamole , in the presence or absence of another antiplatelet drug reduced the risk of vascular death , though it reduces the risk of further vascular events .
This benefit was found only in patients presenting after cerebral ischaemia .
There was no evidence that dipyridamole alone was more efficacious than aspirin
BACKGROUND Patients with limited cerebral ischaemia of arterial origin are at risk of serious vascular events ( 4 % to 11 % annually ) .
Aspirin reduces that risk by 13 % .
In one trial , adding dipyridamole to aspirin was associated with a 22 % risk reduction compared with aspirin alone .
OBJECTIVES To assess the efficacy and safety of dipyridamole versus control in the secondary prevention of vascular events in patients with vascular disease .
The United Kingdom transient ischaemic attack (UK-TIA) aspirin trial: final results.
From 1979 - 85 , 2435 patients with a transient ischaemic attack or minor ischaemic stroke were r and omly allocated to receive long term " blind " treatment with aspirin 600 mg twice daily ( n = 815 ) , aspirin 300 mg once daily ( n = 806 ) or placebo ( n = 814 ) . No patient was lost to follow up . The " intention to treat " comparison included all the serious vascular events and deaths which occurred before the end of the follow up period on 30 September 1986 . There was no difference in efficacy between the 300 mg and 1200 mg daily doses of aspirin , but the lower dose was undoubtedly less gastrotoxic . Also , there was no definite difference in the response of  males and females to aspirin . The odds of suffering a major stroke , myocardial infa rct ion or vascular death were 15 % less in the combined aspirin groups compared with the placebo group ( 95 % confidence interval 29 % reduction to 3 % increase in odds ) which is compatible with the continuing overview of all the similar trials of antiplatelet drugs where the relative reduction in odds was 25 % . There was no statistically significant reduction in the likelihood of either disabling major stroke and vascular death or vascular death occurring
This result was not influenced by the dose of dipyridamole or type of presenting vascular disease .
For patients who presented with arterial vascular disease , there was no evidence that dipyridamole , in the presence or absence of another antiplatelet drug reduced the risk of vascular death , though it reduces the risk of further vascular events .
This benefit was found only in patients presenting after cerebral ischaemia .
There was no evidence that dipyridamole alone was more efficacious than aspirin
BACKGROUND Patients with limited cerebral ischaemia of arterial origin are at risk of serious vascular events ( 4 % to 11 % annually ) .
Aspirin reduces that risk by 13 % .
In one trial , adding dipyridamole to aspirin was associated with a 22 % risk reduction compared with aspirin alone .
OBJECTIVES To assess the efficacy and safety of dipyridamole versus control in the secondary prevention of vascular events in patients with vascular disease .