Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
Effects of exercise training on exercise capacity in patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving targeted therapy
Purpose Peak oxygen consumption ( VO2peak ) is an important predictive factor for long-term prognosis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer ( NSCLC ) . The purpose of this study was to investigate whether 8 weeks of exercise training improves exercise capacity , as assessed by VO2peak , and other related factors in patients with NSCLC receiving targeted therapy . Methods A total of 24 participants with adenocarcinoma were r and omly assigned to either the control group ( n = 11 ) or the exercise group ( n = 13 ) . Subjects in the exercise group participated in individualized , high-intensity aerobic interval training of exercise . The outcome measures assessed at baseline and after 8 weeks were as follows : VO2peak and the percentage of predicted VO2peak ( % predVO2peak ) , muscle strength and endurance of the right quadriceps , muscle oxygenation during exercise , insulin resistance as calculated by the homeostasis model , high-sensitivity C-reactive protein , and quality of life ( QoL ) question naire inventory . Results No exercise-related adverse events were reported . After exercise training , VO2peak and % predVO2peak increased by 1.6 mL kg−1 min−1 and 5.3 % ( p < 0.005 ) , respectively ; these changes were associated with improvements in circulatory , respiratory , and muscular functions at peak exercise ( all p = 0.001 ) . The exercise group also had less dyspnea ( p = 0.01 ) and favorably lower fatigue ( p = 0.05 ) than baseline . Conclusions Patients with NSCLC receiving targeted therapy have quite a low exercise capacity , even with a relatively high QoL. Exercise training appears to improve exercise capacity and alleviate some cancer-related symptoms
Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?