Conclusions Compared to st and ard post-discharge care , regular telephone support interventions may help reduce feelings of anxiety and depression as well as , improve systolic blood pressure control and the likelihood of smoking cessation
Background Cardiac rehabilitation is offered to individuals after cardiac events to aid recovery and reduce the likelihood of further cardiac illness .
However , patient participation remains suboptimal and the provision of high quality care to an exp and ing population of patients with chronic heart conditions is becoming increasingly difficult .
A systematic review and meta- analysis was conducted to determine the effect of telephone support interventions compared with st and ard post-discharge care on coronary artery disease patient outcomes .
Choice of secondary prevention improves risk factors after acute coronary syndrome: 1-year follow-up of the CHOICE (Choice of Health Options In prevention of Cardiovascular Events) randomised controlled trial
Objective : To determine the effect of a new CHOICE ( Choice of Health Options In prevention of Cardiovascular Events ) programme on cardiovascular risk factors in acute coronary syndrome ( ACS ) survivors . Design : Single-blind r and omised controlled trial . Setting : Tertiary referral hospital in Sydney Australia . Patients : 144 ACS survivors who were not accessing st and ard cardiac rehabilitation .  Data were also collected on a further 64 ACS survivors attending st and ard cardiac rehabilitation . Intervention : The CHOICE group ( n = 72 ) participated in a brief , patient-centred , modular programme comprising a clinic visit plus telephone support , encompassing m and atory cholesterol lowering and tailored preferential risk modification . The control group ( n = 72 ) participated in continuing conventional care but no central ly coordinated secondary prevention . Main outcome measures : Values for total cholesterol , systolic blood pressure , smoking status and physical activity . Results : CHOICE and control groups were well matched at baseline . At 12 months , the CHOICE group ( n = 67 ) had significantly better risk factor levels than controls ( n = 69 ) for total cholesterol ( TC ) ( mean ( SEM ) 4.0 ( 0.1 ) vs 4.7 ( 0.1 ) mmol/l , p<0.001 ) , systolic blood pressure ( 131.6 ( 1.8 ) vs 143.9 ( 2.3 ) mm Hg , p<0.001 ) , body mass index ( 28.9 ( 0.7 ) vs 31.2 ( 0.7 ) kg/m2 , p = 0.025 ) and physical activity ( 1369.1 ( 167.2 ) vs 715.1 ( 103.5 ) METS/kg/min , p = 0.001 ) as well as a better knowledge of risk factor targets . Also at 1 year , fewer CHOICE participants ( 21 % ) had three or more risk factors above widely recommended levels then controls ( 72 % ) ( p<0.001 ) . Conclusions : Participation in a brief CHOICE programme significantly improved the modifiable risk profiles and risk factor knowledge of ACS survivors over 12 months . CHOICE is an effective alternative for dealing with the widespread underuse of existing secondary prevention programmes . Trial registration number : IS RCT
Conclusions Compared to st and ard post-discharge care , regular telephone support interventions may help reduce feelings of anxiety and depression as well as , improve systolic blood pressure control and the likelihood of smoking cessation
Background Cardiac rehabilitation is offered to individuals after cardiac events to aid recovery and reduce the likelihood of further cardiac illness .
However , patient participation remains suboptimal and the provision of high quality care to an exp and ing population of patients with chronic heart conditions is becoming increasingly difficult .
A systematic review and meta- analysis was conducted to determine the effect of telephone support interventions compared with st and ard post-discharge care on coronary artery disease patient outcomes .