Conclusion The current best evidence indicates that a glass ionomer cement has a significantly lower risk of loss of a NCCL restoration compared to either a three-step etch- and -rinse or a two-step etch- and -rinse adhesive system ; a three-step etch- and -rinse adhesive system has a significantly lower risk of loss of a NCCL restoration compared to a two-step etch- and -rinse adhesive system .
No significant difference could be observed in the risk of loss of a tooth-colored NCCL restoration between a three-step etch- and -rinse adhesive system and either a two-step self-etch or a one-step self-etch adhesive system
Objectives The aim of this review was to assess the effect of different adhesive systems and tooth preparation on the retention of tooth-colored restorative material s  placed in non-carious cervical lesions ( NCCLs ) .
Three-year clinical evaluation of a flowable and a hybrid resin composite in non-carious cervical lesions.
OBJECTIVES This r and omized controlled clinical trial evaluated the 3-year clinical performance of a hybrid ( Clearfil AP-X ; AP ) and a flowable ( Clearfil Flow FX ; FX ) resin composite in 98 non-carious cervical lesions . METHODS Twenty-two patients , 11 males and 11 females ( mean age : 61.9 years , range : 29 - 78 years ) regularly visiting the Nagasaki University Hospital , participated in the study . Each patient received both material s r and omly . All restorations ( 48 restorations for AP and 50 restorations for FX ) were placed in conjunction with an all-in-one system ( Clearfil S(3 ) Bond ) by one dentist . The restorations were blindly evaluated by two examiners at baseline , 6 months , 1 , 2 and 3 years using modified USPHS criteria . The data were statistically analyzed using the Cochran 's Q-test and Fisher 's exact test . RESULTS All the patients were examined at each recall . However , five restorations could not be evaluated at 3-year recall as two teeth had been extracted and three restorations had been lost . The only minor problem was the integrity of the enamel margin . The incidence and extent of marginal staining increased with time , but it was still superficial . Marginal staining occurred adjacent to 11 restorations for AP and 12 restorations for FX after 3 years . Neither lesion size nor depth had influence on marginal staining adjacent to each type of resin composite . There were no significant differences in the clinical performances between AP and FX for each variable . CONCLUSIONS Under the protocol used in this study , both types of resin composite in conjunction with S(3 ) Bond demonstrated an acceptable clinical performance up to 3 years
Conclusion The current best evidence indicates that a glass ionomer cement has a significantly lower risk of loss of a NCCL restoration compared to either a three-step etch- and -rinse or a two-step etch- and -rinse adhesive system ; a three-step etch- and -rinse adhesive system has a significantly lower risk of loss of a NCCL restoration compared to a two-step etch- and -rinse adhesive system .
No significant difference could be observed in the risk of loss of a tooth-colored NCCL restoration between a three-step etch- and -rinse adhesive system and either a two-step self-etch or a one-step self-etch adhesive system
Objectives The aim of this review was to assess the effect of different adhesive systems and tooth preparation on the retention of tooth-colored restorative material s  placed in non-carious cervical lesions ( NCCLs ) .