Conclusion Overall , our findings do not support the presence of a secondary loss of strength following an acute muscle injury , and strongly suggest that strength , on average , recovers steadily over the first 3 days post-injury
Background An immediate loss of strength follows virtually all types of muscle injury but there is debate whether the initial strength loss is maximal or if a secondary loss of strength occurs during the first 3 days post-injury .
Objective The objective of this analysis was to conduct a systematic review and meta- analysis of the research literature to determine if a secondary loss of strength occurs after an injurious initiating event .
Muscle damage and soreness after endurance exercise of the elbow flexors.
PURPOSE This study investigated changes in indirect markers of muscle damage after  endurance exercise of the elbow flexors  and compared the changes with those after maximal eccentric actions ( Max-ECC ) of the elbow flexors . METHODS Eighteen male students  rhythmically lifted ( 1 s ) and lowered ( 1 s ) a light dumbbell ( 1.1 - 1.8 kg : 9 % of MIF ) in 60 - 180 degrees of elbow joint angle for 2 h ( 2-h Ex ) .  Maximal isometric force ( MIF ) , relaxed ( RANG ) and flexed elbow joint angles ( FANG ) , upper-arm circumference ( CIR ) , muscle soreness ( SOR ) , B-mode ultrasound ( US ) , and plasma creatine kinase ( CK ) activity were assessed before and immediately after , and up to 96 h after exercise . RESULTS All measures were altered significantly ( P < 0.05 ) after 2-h Ex in a similar time course to Max-ECC ; however , changes in RANG , FANG , CIR , US , and CK ( peak : 356 + /- 121 IU.L-1 ) were significantly ( P < 0.05 ) smaller compared with those after Max-ECC . SOR developed immediately after 2-h Ex and peaked 24 - 48 h after exercise . MIF dropped to 44.1 % of the preexercise level , which was significantly ( P < 0.05 ) lower than that after Max-ECC ( 58.1 % ) , immediately postexercise . MIF recovered to 79.8 % at 24 h , and 97.8 % at 96 h postexercise , which was a significantly ( P < 0.05 ) faster recovery compared with that of Max-ECC ( 73.1 % at 96 h ) . CONCLUSION These results showed low-intensity continuous muscle contractions ( 3600 times ) result ed in muscle damage ; however , the magnitude of the muscle damage was less severe , and the recovery was faster compared with 12 maximal eccentric muscle actions
Conclusion Overall , our findings do not support the presence of a secondary loss of strength following an acute muscle injury , and strongly suggest that strength , on average , recovers steadily over the first 3 days post-injury
Background An immediate loss of strength follows virtually all types of muscle injury but there is debate whether the initial strength loss is maximal or if a secondary loss of strength occurs during the first 3 days post-injury .
Objective The objective of this analysis was to conduct a systematic review and meta- analysis of the research literature to determine if a secondary loss of strength occurs after an injurious initiating event .