Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
Benefits of supervised group exercise programme for women being treated for early stage breast cancer: pragmatic randomised controlled trial
Objectives To determine functional and psychological benefits of a 12 week supervised group exercise programme during treatment for early stage breast cancer , with six month follow-up . Design Pragmatic r and omised controlled prospect i ve open trial . Setting Three National Health Service oncology clinics in Scotl and and community exercise facilities . Participants 203 women entered the study ; 177 completed the six month follow-up . Interventions Supervised 12 week group exercise programme in addition to usual care , compared with usual care . Main outcome measures Functional assessment of cancer therapy ( FACT ) question naire , Beck depression inventory , positive and negative affect scale , body mass index , seven day recall of physical activity , 12 minute walk test , and assessment of shoulder mobility . Results Mixed effects models with adjustment for baseline values , study site , treatment at baseline , and age gave intervention effect estimates ( intervention minus control ) at 12 weeks of 129 ( 95 % confidence interval 83 to 176 ) for metres walked in 12 minutes , 182 ( 75 to 289 ) for minutes of moderate intensity activity reported in a week , 2.6 ( 1.6 to 3.7 ) for shoulder mobility , 2.5 ( 1.0 to 3.9 ) for breast cancer specific subscale of quality of life , and 4.0 ( 1.8 to 6.3 ) for positive mood . No significant effect was seen for general quality of life ( FACT-G ) , which was the primary outcome . At the six month follow-up , most of these effects were maintained and an intervention effect for breast cancer specific quality of life emerged . No adverse effects were noted . Conclusion Supervised group exercise provided functional and psychological benefit after a 12 week intervention and six months later . Clinicians should encourage activity for their patients . Policy makers should consider the inclusion of exercise opportunities in cancer rehabilitation services . Trial registration Current controlled trials IS RCT N12587864
Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?