Pool analyses indicated that CB ablation was more beneficial in terms of procedural time [ st and ard mean difference = −0.58 ; 95 % confidence interval ( CI ) , −0.85 to −0.30 ] , complications without phrenic nerve injury ( PNI ) [ odds ratio ( OR ) = 0.79 ; 95 % CI , 0.67–0.93 ; I2 = 16 % ] , and recrudescence ( OR = 0.83 ; 95 % CI , 0.70–0.97 ; I2 = 63 % ) for PAF ; however , the total complications of CB was higher than RF .
The subgroup analysis found that , compared with non-contact force radiofrequency ( non-CF-RF ) , both first-generation cryoballoon ( CB1 ) and second-generation cryoballoon ( CB2 ) ablation  could reduce complications with PNI , procedural time , and recrudescence .
However , the safety and efficacy of CB2 was similar to those of CF-RF .
Conclusion Available overall and subgroup data suggested that both CB1 and CB2 were more beneficial than RF ablation , and the main advantages were reflected in comparing them with non-CF-RF .
However , CF-RF and CB2 showed similar clinical benefits
Purpose The present systematic review and meta- analysis aim ed to assess and compare the safety and efficacy of radiofrequency ( RF ) and cryoballoon ( CB ) ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ( PAF ) .
RF and CB ablation are two frequently used methods for pulmonary vein isolation in PAF , but which is a better choice for PAF remains uncertain .
Real-time contact force sensing for pulmonary vein isolation in the setting of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: procedural and 1-year results.
INTRODUCTION The additional benefit of contact force ( CF ) technology during pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ( AF ) to improve mid-term clinical outcome is unclear . METHODS AND RESULTS Eligible patients with symptomatic paroxysmal AF were enrolled in this prospect i ve trial , comparing circular antral catheter ablation ( guided by Carto 3 System , Biosense Webster ) using either a new open-irrigated CF catheter ( SmartTouch Thermocool , Biosense Webster ) ( CF group ) or a non-CF open-irrigated catheter ( EZ Steer Thermocool , Biosense Webster ) ( control group ) . Overall , 30 patients were enrolled in each group , with a st and ardized 12-month follow-up , free of antiarrhythmic therapy . Demographic , cardiovascular and anatomic characteristics were similar in both groups . Though complete PVI was eventually achieved in all cases in both groups , success using an exclusive anatomic approach was 80.0 % in CF group versus 36.7 % in control group ( P < 0.0001 ) . CF use was associated with significant reductions in fluoroscopy exposure ( P < 0.01 ) and radiofrequency time ( P = 0.01 ) . The incidence rates of AF recurrence were 10.5 % ( 95 % CI , 1.38 - 22.4 ) in the CF group , and 35.9 % ( 95 % CI , 12.4 - 59.4 ) in the control group ( log rank test , P = 0.04 ) . After adjustment on potential confounders , the use of CF catheter was found to be associated with a lower AF recurrence ( OR 0.18 , 95 % CI 0.04 - 0.94 , P = 0.04 ) . CONCLUSION Our findings suggest a potential benefit of real-time CF sensing technology , in reducing AF recurrence during the first year after PVI
Pool analyses indicated that CB ablation was more beneficial in terms of procedural time [ st and ard mean difference = −0.58 ; 95 % confidence interval ( CI ) , −0.85 to −0.30 ] , complications without phrenic nerve injury ( PNI ) [ odds ratio ( OR ) = 0.79 ; 95 % CI , 0.67–0.93 ; I2 = 16 % ] , and recrudescence ( OR = 0.83 ; 95 % CI , 0.70–0.97 ; I2 = 63 % ) for PAF ; however , the total complications of CB was higher than RF .
The subgroup analysis found that , compared with non-contact force radiofrequency ( non-CF-RF ) , both first-generation cryoballoon ( CB1 ) and second-generation cryoballoon ( CB2 ) ablation  could reduce complications with PNI , procedural time , and recrudescence .
However , the safety and efficacy of CB2 was similar to those of CF-RF .
Conclusion Available overall and subgroup data suggested that both CB1 and CB2 were more beneficial than RF ablation , and the main advantages were reflected in comparing them with non-CF-RF .
However , CF-RF and CB2 showed similar clinical benefits
Purpose The present systematic review and meta- analysis aim ed to assess and compare the safety and efficacy of radiofrequency ( RF ) and cryoballoon ( CB ) ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ( PAF ) .
RF and CB ablation are two frequently used methods for pulmonary vein isolation in PAF , but which is a better choice for PAF remains uncertain .