Sensitivity analysis indicates that from both perspectives the service is very cost effective and may be cost saving .
CONCLUSIONS These results make alcohol screening and counseling one of the highest-ranking preventive services among the 25 effective services evaluated using st and ardized methods .
BACKGROUND The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force ( USPSTF ) has recommended screening and behavioral counseling interventions in primary care to reduce alcohol misuse .
This study was design ed to develop a st and ardized rating for the clinical ly preventable burden and cost effectiveness of complying with that recommendation that would allow comparisons across many recommended services .
Evaluation of a controlled drinking minimal intervention for problem drinkers in general practice (the DRAMS scheme).
Sixteen general practitioners participated in a controlled trial of the Scottish Health Education Group 's  DRAMS ( drinking reasonably and moderately with self-control ) scheme . The scheme was evaluated by r and omly assigning 104 heavy or problem drinkers to three groups - a group participating in the DRAMS scheme  ( n = 34 ) , a group given simple advice only ( n = 32 ) and a non-intervention control group ( n = 38 ) . Six month follow-up information was obtained for 91 subjects ( 87.5 % of initial sample ) . There were no significant differences between the groups in reduction in alcohol consumption , but patients in the DRAMS group showed a significantly greater reduction in a logarithmic measure of serum gamma-glutamyl-transpeptidase than patients in the group receiving advice only . Only 14 patients in the DRAMS group completed the full DRAMS procedure . For the sample as a whole , there was a significant reduction in alcohol consumption , a significant improvement on a measure of physical health and well-being , and significant reductions in the logarithmic measure of serum gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase and in mean corpuscular volume . The implication s of these findings for future research into controlled drinking minimal interventions in general practice are discussed
Sensitivity analysis indicates that from both perspectives the service is very cost effective and may be cost saving .
CONCLUSIONS These results make alcohol screening and counseling one of the highest-ranking preventive services among the 25 effective services evaluated using st and ardized methods .
BACKGROUND The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force ( USPSTF ) has recommended screening and behavioral counseling interventions in primary care to reduce alcohol misuse .
This study was design ed to develop a st and ardized rating for the clinical ly preventable burden and cost effectiveness of complying with that recommendation that would allow comparisons across many recommended services .