So far , the evidence available from the studies included is insufficient to prove that neuraxial anesthesia is more effective and safer than general anesthesia for orthopedic surgery .
However , this systematic review does not rule out clinical ly important differences with regard to mortality , stroke , myocardial infa rct ion , length of hospitalization , postoperative cognitive dysfunction or pneumonia
CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE Taking the outcome of mortality into consideration , there is controversy about the beneficial effects of neuraxial anesthesia for orthopedic surgery .
The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of neuraxial anesthesia versus general anesthesia for  orthopedic surgery .
Cognitive effects after epidural vs general anesthesia in older adults. A randomized trial.
OBJECTIVE To compare the effect of epidural vs general anesthesia on the incidence of long-term cognitive dysfunction after total knee replacement surgery in older adults . DESIGN R and omized controlled clinical trial . SETTING Orthopedic specialty academic hospital . PATIENTS A total of 262 patients undergoing elective primary total knee replacement with a median age of 69 years ; 70 % women . INTERVENTION R and om assignment to either epidural or general anesthesia . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES A thorough neuropsychological assessment was performed preoperatively and repeated at 1 week and 6 months postoperatively . Cognitive outcome was assessed by within-patient change on 10 tests of memory , psychomotor , and language skills . Prospect i ve st and ardized surveillance for cardiovascular complications was performed to allow simultaneous assessment of anesthetic effects on cognitive and cardiovascular outcomes . RESULTS The two groups were similar at baseline in terms of age , sex , comorbidity , and cognitive function . There were no significant differences between the epidural and general anesthesia groups in within-subject change from baseline on any of the 10 cognitive test results at either 1 week or 6 months . Overall , 5 % of patients showed a long-term clinical ly significant deterioration in cognitive function . There was no difference between the anesthesia groups in the incidence of major cardiovascular complications ( 3 % overall ) . CONCLUSIONS The type of anesthesia , general or epidural , does not affect the magnitude or pattern of postoperative cognitive dysfunction or the incidence of major cardiovascular complications in older adults undergoing elective total knee replacement . This is the largest trial of the effects of general vs regional anesthesia on cerebral function reported to date , with more than 99 % power to detect a clinical ly significant difference on any of the neuropsychological tests
So far , the evidence available from the studies included is insufficient to prove that neuraxial anesthesia is more effective and safer than general anesthesia for orthopedic surgery .
However , this systematic review does not rule out clinical ly important differences with regard to mortality , stroke , myocardial infa rct ion , length of hospitalization , postoperative cognitive dysfunction or pneumonia
CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE Taking the outcome of mortality into consideration , there is controversy about the beneficial effects of neuraxial anesthesia for orthopedic surgery .
The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of neuraxial anesthesia versus general anesthesia for  orthopedic surgery .