On the CGI-I scale , the analysis revealed that MPH was more effective than ATX and GXR .
For any adverse events , RBX ( 89 % ) was the safest alternative .
Network meta- analysis offered a broader overview on the available treatments for ADHD , especially for safety issues , and contributes towards evidence gathering and clinical practice decisions .
The aim of this study is to gather evidence of head-to-head double-blind r and omized-controlled trials on the efficacy and safety of available treatments for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder ( ADHD ) in children and adolescents .
Randomised controlled study-efficacy of clonidine versus carbamazepine in children with ADHD.
BACKGROUND Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder ( ADHD ) is one of the most common childhood psychiatric disorder with a prevalence of 8 - 12 % . Even though psychostimulants remain the treatment of choice , its cost and availability in developing countries limits the usage of the drug . In view of free availability and low cost , a R and omized controlled study was carried out using two second line drugs ( clonidine and carbamazepine ) in a tertiary care hospital , Pondicherry , South India . OBJECTIVE To compare the efficacy of clonidine and carbamazepine in children with ADHD . METHOD With approval of ethics committee , a prospect i ve , Double-blind , R and omized controlled study of clonidine and carbamazepine was conducted with 50 children with ADHD ( age group 4 - 12 years ) , over a period of 2 years ( 2005 - 07 ) in a tertiary care hospital , Pondicherry , South India . RESULTS Clonidine was effective in improving the hyperactivity and impulsivity symptoms in children with ADHD as compared to carbamazepine . Statistical significant improvement was not noted with respect to inattention symptoms and other comorbid conditions . CONCLUSION Clonidine can be a safer and cheaper alternative in treatment of children with ADHD , with a predominant effect on their hyperactivity and impulsivity symptoms
On the CGI-I scale , the analysis revealed that MPH was more effective than ATX and GXR .
For any adverse events , RBX ( 89 % ) was the safest alternative .
Network meta- analysis offered a broader overview on the available treatments for ADHD , especially for safety issues , and contributes towards evidence gathering and clinical practice decisions .
The aim of this study is to gather evidence of head-to-head double-blind r and omized-controlled trials on the efficacy and safety of available treatments for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder ( ADHD ) in children and adolescents .