Women taking HT had a significantly decreased incidence of fracture with long-term use .
Research ers found no strong evidence that HT has a clinical ly meaningful impact on the incidence of colorectal cancer .
AUTHORS ' CONCLUSIONS : Women with intolerable menopausal symptoms may wish to weigh the benefits of symptom relief against the small absolute risk of harm arising from short-term use of low-dose HT , provided they do not have specific contraindications .
HT may be unsuitable for some women , including those at increased risk of cardiovascular disease , increased risk of thromboembolic disease ( such as those with obesity or a history of venous thrombosis ) or increased risk of some types of cancer ( such as breast cancer , in women with a uterus ) .
The risk of endometrial cancer among women with a uterus taking oestrogen-only HT is well documented .
HT is not indicated for primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease or dementia , nor for prevention of deterioration of cognitive function in postmenopausal women .
Although HT is considered effective for the prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis , it is generally recommended as an option only for women at significant risk for whom non-oestrogen therapies are unsuitable .
BACKGROUND : Hormone therapy ( HT ) is widely provided for control of menopausal symptoms and has been used for the management and prevention of cardiovascular disease , osteoporosis and  dementia in older women .
This is an up date d version of a Cochrane review first published in 2005 .
OBJECTIVES : To assess effects of long-term HT ( at least 1 year 's duration ) on mortality , cardiovascular outcomes , cancer , gallbladder disease , fracture and cognition in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women during and after cessation of treatment .
Coronary Heart Disease in Postmenopausal Recipients of Estrogen Plus Progestin Therapy: Does the Increased Risk Ever Disappear?
BACKGROUND Estrogen plus progestin therapy increases the risk for coronary heart disease ( CHD ) in postmenopausal women . However , this increased risk might be limited to the first years of use and to women who start therapy late in menopause . OBJECTIVE To estimate the effect of continuous estrogen plus progestin therapy on CHD risk over time and stratified by years since menopause . DESIGN Women 's Health Initiative r and omized , double-blinded , placebo-controlled trial . ( Clinical Trials.gov registration number : NCT00000611 ) SETTING 40 U.S. clinical centers . PATIENTS 16 608 postmenopausal women with an intact uterus at baseline from 1993 to 1998 . INTERVENTION Conjugated equine estrogens , 0.625 mg/d , plus medroxyprogesterone acetate , 2.5 mg/d , or placebo . MEASUREMENTS Adherence-adjusted hazard ratios and CHD-free survival curves estimated through inverse probability weighting . RESULTS Compared with no use of hormone therapy , the hazard ratio for continuous use of estrogen plus progestin therapy was 2.36 ( 95 % CI , 1.55 to 3.62 ) for the first 2 years and 1.69 ( CI , 0.98 to 2.89 ) for the first 8 years . For women within 10 years after menopause , the hazard ratios were 1.29 ( CI , 0.52 to 3.18 ) for the first 2 years and 0.64 ( CI , 0.21 to 1.99 ) for the first 8 years , and the CHD-free survival curves for continuous use and no use of estrogen plus progestin crossed at about 6 years ( CI , 2 years to 10 years ) . LIMITATION The analysis may not have fully adjusted for joint determinants of adherence and CHD risk . Sample sizes for some subgroup analyses were small . CONCLUSION No suggestion of a decreased risk for CHD was found within the first 2 years of estrogen plus progestin use , including in women who initiated therapy within 10 years after menopause . A possible cardioprotective effect in these women who initiated therapy closer to menopause became apparent only after 6 years of use . PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE National Heart , Lung , and Blood Institute
Women taking HT had a significantly decreased incidence of fracture with long-term use .
Research ers found no strong evidence that HT has a clinical ly meaningful impact on the incidence of colorectal cancer .
AUTHORS ' CONCLUSIONS : Women with intolerable menopausal symptoms may wish to weigh the benefits of symptom relief against the small absolute risk of harm arising from short-term use of low-dose HT , provided they do not have specific contraindications .
HT may be unsuitable for some women , including those at increased risk of cardiovascular disease , increased risk of thromboembolic disease ( such as those with obesity or a history of venous thrombosis ) or increased risk of some types of cancer ( such as breast cancer , in women with a uterus ) .
The risk of endometrial cancer among women with a uterus taking oestrogen-only HT is well documented .
HT is not indicated for primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease or dementia , nor for prevention of deterioration of cognitive function in postmenopausal women .
Although HT is considered effective for the prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis , it is generally recommended as an option only for women at significant risk for whom non-oestrogen therapies are unsuitable .
BACKGROUND : Hormone therapy ( HT ) is widely provided for control of menopausal symptoms and has been used for the management and prevention of cardiovascular disease , osteoporosis and  dementia in older women .
This is an up date d version of a Cochrane review first published in 2005 .
OBJECTIVES : To assess effects of long-term HT ( at least 1 year 's duration ) on mortality , cardiovascular outcomes , cancer , gallbladder disease , fracture and cognition in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women during and after cessation of treatment .