Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
Effect of upper extremity exercise on secondary lymphedema in breast cancer patients: a pilot study.
PURPOSE To examine the effect of a progressive upper-body exercise program on  lymphedema secondary to breast cancer treatment . METHODS Fourteen breast cancer survivors with unilateral upper extremity lymphedema were r and omly assigned to an exercise ( n = 7 ) or control group ( n = 7 ) . The exercise group followed a progressive , 8-week upper-body exercise program consisting of resistance training plus aerobic exercise using a Monark Rehab Trainer arm ergometer . Lymphedema was assessed by arm circumference and measurement of arm volume by water displacement . Patients were evaluated on five occasions over the experimental period . The Medical Outcomes Trust Short-Form 36 Survey was used to measure quality of life before and after the intervention . Significance was set at alpha < or = 0.01 . RESULTS No changes were found in arm circumference or arm volume as a result of the exercise program . Three of the quality -of-life domains showed trends toward increases in the exercise group : physical functioning ( P = .050 ) , general health ( P = .048 ) , and vitality ( P = .023 ) . Mental health increased , although not significantly , for all subjects ( P = .019 ) . Arm volume measured by water displacement was correlated with calculated arm volume ( r = .973 , P < .001 ) , although the exercise and control group means were significantly different ( P < .001 ) . CONCLUSIONS Participation in an upper-body exercise program caused no changes in arm circumference or arm volume in women with lymphedema after breast cancer , and they may have experienced an increase in quality of life . Additional studies should be done in this area to determine the optimum training program
Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?