A significant positive effect of the interventions on weight was reported by all study types .
The meta- analysis showed that lifestyle interventions achieved weight and waist circumference reductions after one year .
However , no clear effects on biochemical or clinical parameters were observed , possibly due to short follow-up periods or lack of power of the studies meta-analysed .
Changes in dietary parameters or physical activity were generally not reported .
Most studies assessing feasibility were supportive of implementation of lifestyle interventions in routine clinical care .
Conclusion Lifestyle interventions for patients at high risk of diabetes , delivered by a variety of healthcare providers in routine clinical setting s , are feasible but appear to be of limited clinical benefit one year after intervention .
Despite convincing evidence from structured intensive trials , this systematic review showed that translation into routine practice has less effect on diabetes risk reduction
Background The clinical effectiveness of intensive lifestyle interventions in preventing or delaying diabetes in people at high risk has been established from r and omised trials of structured , intensive interventions conducted in several countries over the past two decades .
The challenge is to translate them into routine clinical setting s. The objective of this review is to determine whether lifestyle interventions delivered to high-risk adult patients in routine clinical care setting s are feasible and effective in achieving reductions in risk factors for diabetes .
Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes by lifestyle intervention in an Australian primary health care setting: Greater Green Triangle (GGT) Diabetes Prevention Project
Background R and omised controlled trials demonstrate a 60 % reduction in  type 2 diabetes incidence through lifestyle modification programmes . The aim of this study is to determine whether such programmes are feasible in primary health care . Methods An intervention study including 237 individuals 40–75 years of age with moderate or high risk of developing type 2 diabetes . A structured group programme with six 90 minute sessions delivered during an eight month period by trained nurses in Australian primary health care in 2004–2006 . Main outcome measures taken at baseline , three , and 12 months included weight , height , waist circumference , fasting plasma glucose and lipids , plasma glucose two hours after oral glucose challenge , blood pressure , measures of psychological distress and general health outcomes . To test differences between baseline and follow-up , paired t-tests and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were performed . Results At twelve months participants ' mean weight reduced by 2.52 kg ( 95 % confidence interval 1.85 to 3.19 ) and waist circumference by 4.17 cm ( 3.48 to 4.87 ) . Mean fasting glucose reduced by 0.14 mmol/l ( 0.07 to 0.20 ) , plasma glucose two hours after oral glucose challenge by 0.58 mmol/l ( 0.36 to 0.79 ) , total cholesterol by 0.29 mmol/l ( 0.18 to 0.40 ) , low density lipoprotein cholesterol by 0.25 mmol/l ( 0.16 to 0.34 ) , triglycerides by 0.15 mmol/l ( 0.05 to 0.24 ) and diastolic blood pressure by 2.14 mmHg ( 0.94 to 3.33 ) . Significant improvements were also found in most psychological measures . Conclusion This study provides evidence that a type 2 diabetes prevention programme using lifestyle intervention is feasible in primary health care setting s , with reductions in risk factors approaching those observed in clinical trials . Trial NumberCurrent Controlled Trials IS RCT
A significant positive effect of the interventions on weight was reported by all study types .
The meta- analysis showed that lifestyle interventions achieved weight and waist circumference reductions after one year .
However , no clear effects on biochemical or clinical parameters were observed , possibly due to short follow-up periods or lack of power of the studies meta-analysed .
Changes in dietary parameters or physical activity were generally not reported .
Most studies assessing feasibility were supportive of implementation of lifestyle interventions in routine clinical care .
Conclusion Lifestyle interventions for patients at high risk of diabetes , delivered by a variety of healthcare providers in routine clinical setting s , are feasible but appear to be of limited clinical benefit one year after intervention .
Despite convincing evidence from structured intensive trials , this systematic review showed that translation into routine practice has less effect on diabetes risk reduction
Background The clinical effectiveness of intensive lifestyle interventions in preventing or delaying diabetes in people at high risk has been established from r and omised trials of structured , intensive interventions conducted in several countries over the past two decades .
The challenge is to translate them into routine clinical setting s. The objective of this review is to determine whether lifestyle interventions delivered to high-risk adult patients in routine clinical care setting s are feasible and effective in achieving reductions in risk factors for diabetes .