Results showed that mechanical active irrigation reduces post-operative pain .
It improved debridement , canal/isthmus cleanliness .
It also improved delivery of irrigant up to working length .
Bacterial count was more with active irrigation , though not significant .
There is no effect on long-term periapical healing .
Conclusion It may be concluded that mechanical active irrigation devices are beneficial in reducing post-operative pain and improving canal and isthmus cleanliness during Endodontics
Objective Irrigant activation has been cl aim ed to be beneficial in in vitro and clinical studies .
This systematic review aims to investigate the clinical efficiency of mechanically activated irrigants and conventional irrigation .
Comparative evaluation of postoperative pain after using endodontic needle and EndoActivator during root canal irrigation: A randomised controlled trial.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the postoperative level of pain after activation of irrigants using EndoActivator with conventional needle irrigation during root canal therapy . In this prospect i ve r and omised clinical trial , 72 symptomatic irreversible pulpitis patients were selected . Based on block r and omisation after routine root canal preparation , patients were assigned to two groups . In group EN , procedures were performed with endodontic irrigating needle ( n = 36 ) while group EA received activation using EndoActivator ( n = 36 ) in the final irrigation protocol . All the participants were called through phone at 8 , 24 and 48 h to analyse pain score using visual analogue scale . Those patients who developed pain were prescribed ibuprofen 200 mg . Pain score and frequency of tablet intake were recorded and statistically analysed . Results showed that group EA result ed in significantly less postoperative pain and analgesics intake than group EN . In conclusion , within the limitations of this study , the activation of irrigants using EndoActivator can be considered an effective method for reducing postoperative pain
Results showed that mechanical active irrigation reduces post-operative pain .
It improved debridement , canal/isthmus cleanliness .
It also improved delivery of irrigant up to working length .
Bacterial count was more with active irrigation , though not significant .
There is no effect on long-term periapical healing .
Conclusion It may be concluded that mechanical active irrigation devices are beneficial in reducing post-operative pain and improving canal and isthmus cleanliness during Endodontics
Objective Irrigant activation has been cl aim ed to be beneficial in in vitro and clinical studies .
This systematic review aims to investigate the clinical efficiency of mechanically activated irrigants and conventional irrigation .