Conclusions : The probability for success for EMS proved to be significantly greater than the probability for success for RES , providing best available evidence on the influence of cavity preparation with ultrasonic tips and /or SuperEBA ( Keystone Industries , Gibbstown , NJ ) , IRM ( Dentsply Sirona , York , PA ) , MTA , or silicate cements as root‐end filling material instead of a shallow cavity preparation and placement of a resin‐based material .
HIGHLIGHTSEndodontic microsurgery ( EMS ) with the use of high‐magnification ultrasonic root‐end preparation and root‐end filling with SuperEBA , IRM , MTA , or other calcium silicate cements has a high probability of success .
Resin‐based endodontic surgery with the use of high‐magnification preparation of a shallow concave root‐end cavity with bonded resin‐based root‐end filling material performed less favorably than EMS
Introduction : The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of root‐end preparation and filling material on endodontic surgery outcome .
[Periradicular surgery with and without endoscopy: a prospective clinical comparative study].
A total of 129 teeth with periradicular surgeries ( apicoectomies ) were analyzed in a prospect i ve clinical study . In the test group including 62 teeth , an endoscope ( Tele-Otoscope with a 70 degrees viewing angle ) was used as an intraoperative visualization aid to monitor the following surgical steps : root-end resection , root-end cavity preparation and retro grade root-canal obturation . In the control group including 67 teeth , intraoperative diagnostics were carried out using micromirrors . Fifty-four and 61 teeth could be re-examined after one year . Based on the clinical and radiographic findings they were categorized as success , uncertain healing or failure . In the test group with endoscopy , the success rate was 88.9 % , whereas in the control group it was only 75.4 % . However , statistically no significant difference was found between the two groups . Additional experimental and clinical studies will show if endoscopy will improve the success rates in periradicular surgery any further
Conclusions : The probability for success for EMS proved to be significantly greater than the probability for success for RES , providing best available evidence on the influence of cavity preparation with ultrasonic tips and /or SuperEBA ( Keystone Industries , Gibbstown , NJ ) , IRM ( Dentsply Sirona , York , PA ) , MTA , or silicate cements as root‐end filling material instead of a shallow cavity preparation and placement of a resin‐based material .
HIGHLIGHTSEndodontic microsurgery ( EMS ) with the use of high‐magnification ultrasonic root‐end preparation and root‐end filling with SuperEBA , IRM , MTA , or other calcium silicate cements has a high probability of success .
Resin‐based endodontic surgery with the use of high‐magnification preparation of a shallow concave root‐end cavity with bonded resin‐based root‐end filling material performed less favorably than EMS
Introduction : The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of root‐end preparation and filling material on endodontic surgery outcome .