Conclusions ART single-surface restorations  presented high survival percentages in both primary and permanent posterior teeth , whilst ART multiple-surface restorations presented lower survival percentages .
ART sealants presented a high-caries-preventive effect .
Clinical relevance ART is an effective evidence -based option for treating and preventing carious lesions in primary and permanent posterior teeth
Objective The aim of the present study is to up date the results of two previous meta-analyses , published in 2006 and 2012 , on the survival percentages of  atraumatic restorative treatment ( ART ) restorations and ART sealants .
The current meta- analysis includes Chinese publications not investigated before .
Comparison of two tooth-saving preparation techniques for one-surface cavities.
The atraumatic restorative treatment technique ( ART ) is based on removing infected tooth material using only h and instruments and filling the subsequently cleaned cavity with adhesive material such as glass ionomer . As its name suggests , the ART technique should be atraumatic during treatment , as well as for the tooth itself as for the patient . It was primarily developed for treating people living in underserved areas of the world where re sources and facilities such as electricity and trained manpower are limited . Many studies have evaluated the ART technique and the results have supported its application . However , a very limited number of studies have compared ART with more conventional techniques . For that reason , a study was conducted in Pakistan , to compare the ART technique with another more conventional treatment technique . The results of this study show that the preparations with h and instruments result ed in smaller sized cavities and therefore may be less traumatic to the tooth . It was also associated with less pain reactions compared to the more conventional technique . Although preparations with h and instruments required more time , this did not seem to affect the survival of restorations . The survival of glass ionomer cement restorations  made with h and instruments was comparable with single surface amalgam restorations made with a more conventional technique . Recurrent caries was not associated with any glass ionomer cement restorations made with h and instruments . The retention rate of glass ionomer sealants was low , however one dentist had a sealant retention rate of 81.5 percent that suggests that this procedure can be performed satisfactorily in conjunction with a glass ionomer cement restoration . Operator variances did seem to affect the restorations . Survival of glass ionomer restorations  made with both h and and rotary instruments varied for different operators . Similarly , the retention of fissure sealant also varied amongst operators . Operator differences also influenced the extent of tooth substance lost due to cavity preparation . The ART technique is a feasible approach towards the treatment of dental caries especially of one-surface lesions for underserved population
Conclusions ART single-surface restorations  presented high survival percentages in both primary and permanent posterior teeth , whilst ART multiple-surface restorations presented lower survival percentages .
ART sealants presented a high-caries-preventive effect .
Clinical relevance ART is an effective evidence -based option for treating and preventing carious lesions in primary and permanent posterior teeth
Objective The aim of the present study is to up date the results of two previous meta-analyses , published in 2006 and 2012 , on the survival percentages of  atraumatic restorative treatment ( ART ) restorations and ART sealants .
The current meta- analysis includes Chinese publications not investigated before .