REVIEW ER 'S CONCLUSIONS There is no evidence to support feeding with a hydrolysed formula for the prevention of allergy in preference to exclusive breast feeding .
In high risk infants who are unable to be completely breast fed , there is evidence that prolonged feeding with a hydrolysed compared to a cow 's milk formula reduces infant and childhood allergy and infant CMA .
BACKGROUND Allergies and food reactions are common and may be associated with foods including adapted cow 's milk formulas .
Formulas containing hydrolysed proteins have been used to treat infants with allergy or food intolerance , and have been advocated for prevention of allergy and food intolerance in infants .
OBJECTIVES To determine whether use of hydrolysed formulas for infant feeding prevents allergy and food intolerance .
If hydrolysed formulas are effective , to determine what type of hydrolysed formula is most effective including extensively and partially hydrolysed formulas .
To determine which infants benefit including infants at low or high risk of allergy and infants receiving early , short term or prolonged formula feeding .
Dietary modifications versus dicyclomine hydrochloride in the treatment of severe infantile colics
This study examined 120 infants , aged 3–12 weeks , with severe colics and compared the results of a specific hypoallergenic diet ( group A ) with those of pharmacological treatment ( group B ) . Non‐breastfed group A infants  received soy milk and if unresponsive , hydrolyzed milk formulas ;  mothers of breast‐fed infants  received a diet without cow 's milk , eggs or fish .  Breast‐fed and non‐breast‐fed group B infants received dicyclomine hydrochloride 3 mg/kg/day . Results , based on quantitative measurements of crying . indicated that in breast‐fed infants there was no significant improvement between group A ( 62.5 % ) and group B ( 66.6 % ) infants . Among formula‐fed infants , comparison of positive results using soy milk ( 65.9 % ) with positive results using dicyclomine ( 53.3 % ) was not significant ; positive results using soy milk and hydrolyzed milk formulas in non‐responders to soy milk , provided an improvement in 95.4 % of cases . Pharmacological treatment provided an improvement in 53.3 % ) of cases . The diffcrence was significant ( p<0.01 )
REVIEW ER 'S CONCLUSIONS There is no evidence to support feeding with a hydrolysed formula for the prevention of allergy in preference to exclusive breast feeding .
In high risk infants who are unable to be completely breast fed , there is evidence that prolonged feeding with a hydrolysed compared to a cow 's milk formula reduces infant and childhood allergy and infant CMA .
BACKGROUND Allergies and food reactions are common and may be associated with foods including adapted cow 's milk formulas .
Formulas containing hydrolysed proteins have been used to treat infants with allergy or food intolerance , and have been advocated for prevention of allergy and food intolerance in infants .
OBJECTIVES To determine whether use of hydrolysed formulas for infant feeding prevents allergy and food intolerance .
If hydrolysed formulas are effective , to determine what type of hydrolysed formula is most effective including extensively and partially hydrolysed formulas .
To determine which infants benefit including infants at low or high risk of allergy and infants receiving early , short term or prolonged formula feeding .