Patients experienced significant post-THR improvements in Harris Hip scores , but this did not differ between impact types .
Recipients of cross-linked vs. conventional polyethylene cup liners experienced reduced femoral head penetration and revision .
There was no impact of femoral stem fixation and cup shell design on implant survival rates .
Evidence on mortality and complications ( aseptic loosening , femoral fracture ) was inconclusive .
BACKGROUND Evolvements in the design , fixation methods , size , and bearing surface of implants for  total hip replacement ( THR ) have led to a variety of options for healthcare professionals to consider .
The need to determine the most optimal combinations of THR implant is warranted .
This systematic review evaluated the clinical effectiveness of different types of THR used for the treatment of end stage arthritis of the hip .
What Works Best, a Cemented or Cementless Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty?: Minimum 17-year Followup of a Randomized Controlled Trial
Background  Total hip arthroplasty ( THA )  has been associated with high survival rates , but debate remains concerning the best fixation mode of THA . Questions / purpose sWe conducted a r and omized controlled trial ( RCT ) with 250 patients with a mean age of 64 years between October 1987 and January 1992 to compare the results of cementless and cemented fixation . Patients and Methods Patients were evaluated for revision of either of the components . One hundred twenty-seven patients had died ( 51 % ) and 12 ( 4.8 % ) were lost to followup . The minimum 17-year followup data ( mean , 20 years ; range , 17–21 years ) for 52 patients of the cementless group and 41 patients of the cemented group were available for evaluation . Results Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis at 20 years revealed lower survival rates of cemented compared with cementless THA . The cementless tapered stem was associated with a survivorship of 99 % . Age younger than 65 years and male gender were predictors of revision surgery . Conclusions The efficacy of future RCTs can be enhanced by r and omizing patients in specific patient cohorts stratified to age and gender in multicenter RCTs . Including only younger patients might improve the efficacy of a future RCT with smaller sample sizes being required . A minimum 10-year followup should be anticipated , but this can be expected to be longer if the difference in level of quality between the compared implants is smaller . Level of Evidence Level I , therapeutic study . See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence
Patients experienced significant post-THR improvements in Harris Hip scores , but this did not differ between impact types .
Recipients of cross-linked vs. conventional polyethylene cup liners experienced reduced femoral head penetration and revision .
There was no impact of femoral stem fixation and cup shell design on implant survival rates .
Evidence on mortality and complications ( aseptic loosening , femoral fracture ) was inconclusive .
BACKGROUND Evolvements in the design , fixation methods , size , and bearing surface of implants for  total hip replacement ( THR ) have led to a variety of options for healthcare professionals to consider .
The need to determine the most optimal combinations of THR implant is warranted .
This systematic review evaluated the clinical effectiveness of different types of THR used for the treatment of end stage arthritis of the hip .