We found a continuing trend towards conducting DCEs across a broader range of countries .
However , the trend towards including fewer attributes was reversed , whilst the trend towards interview-based DCEs reversed because of increased computer administration .
The trend towards using more flexible econometric models , including mixed logit and latent class , has also continued .
Reporting of monetary values has fallen compared with earlier periods , but the proportion of studies estimating trade-offs between health outcomes and experience factors , or valuing outcomes in terms of utility scores , has increased , although use of odds ratios and probabilities has declined .
The reassuring trend towards the use of more flexible and appropriate DCE design s and econometric methods has been reinforced by the increased use of qualitative methods to inform DCE processes and results .
However , qualitative research methods are being used less often to inform attribute selection , which may make DCEs more susceptible to omitted variable bias if the decision framework is not known prior to the research project .
Background Discrete choice experiments ( DCEs ) are increasingly used in health economics to address a wide range of health policy-related concerns .
Objective Broadly adopting the methodology of an earlier systematic review of health-related DCEs , which covered the period 2001–2008 , we report whether earlier trends continued during 2009–2012 .
Eliciting public preference for health-care resource allocation in South Korea.
OBJECTIVES To identify the principles the public considers important and the trade-offs between different values in health-care re source allocation practice s. METHODS This study approached the issue in both qualitative and quantitative ways . In a qualitative study , two focus groups discussed the issues of re source allocation in health care . To facilitate the discussion , a simple ranking task and a series of pairwise choice practice s were implemented . A discrete choice experiment survey question naire was also administered to a sample of the general population . Attributes and levels were determined through literature review s and the results from the focus group interview . We used a r and om-effect probit model to assess the effects of each attribute . RESULTS Through the focus group interviews , we found strong public support for the principle of equal opportunity . The participants thought that the severity of disease was the most important criterion when setting priorities . The majority supported the idea that the most disadvantaged should have the highest priority even when their health gains are less than those of others . The discrete choice experiment results showed that the severity of disease , health gains , and patients ' socioeconomic status significantly influence their choices , with each parameter having an expected sign . CONCLUSION The results showed that Koreans support not only health maximization but also equal opportunity , fair re source allocation , and e quality
We found a continuing trend towards conducting DCEs across a broader range of countries .
However , the trend towards including fewer attributes was reversed , whilst the trend towards interview-based DCEs reversed because of increased computer administration .
The trend towards using more flexible econometric models , including mixed logit and latent class , has also continued .
Reporting of monetary values has fallen compared with earlier periods , but the proportion of studies estimating trade-offs between health outcomes and experience factors , or valuing outcomes in terms of utility scores , has increased , although use of odds ratios and probabilities has declined .
The reassuring trend towards the use of more flexible and appropriate DCE design s and econometric methods has been reinforced by the increased use of qualitative methods to inform DCE processes and results .
However , qualitative research methods are being used less often to inform attribute selection , which may make DCEs more susceptible to omitted variable bias if the decision framework is not known prior to the research project .
Background Discrete choice experiments ( DCEs ) are increasingly used in health economics to address a wide range of health policy-related concerns .
Objective Broadly adopting the methodology of an earlier systematic review of health-related DCEs , which covered the period 2001–2008 , we report whether earlier trends continued during 2009–2012 .