There was no increased risk of infections with IV iron .
Gastrointestinal AEs were reduced with IV iron .
CONCLUSION Intravenous iron therapy is not associated with an increased risk of SAEs or infections .
Infusion reactions are more pronounced with IV iron
OBJECTIVE To amass all available evidence regarding the safety of intravenous ( IV ) iron preparations to provide a true balance of efficacy and safety .
Large-dose intravenous ferric carboxymaltose injection for iron deficiency anemia in heavy uterine bleeding: a randomized, controlled trial.
BACKGROUND The objective was to evaluate efficacy and safety of rapid , large-dose intravenous ( IV ) administration of ferric carboxymaltose compared to oral iron in correcting iron deficiency anemia due to heavy uterine bleeding . STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS In a r and omized , controlled trial , 477 women with anemia , iron deficiency , and heavy uterine bleeding were assigned to receive either IV ferric carboxymaltose ( < or=1000 mg over 15 min , repeated weekly to achieve a total calculated replacement dose ) or 325 mg of ferrous sulfate ( 65 mg elemental iron ) prescribed orally thrice daily for 6 weeks . RESULTS Compared to those assigned to ferrous sulfate , more patients assigned to ferric carboxymaltose responded with a hemoglobin ( Hb ) increase of 2.0 g/dL or more ( 82 % vs. 62 % , 95 % confidence interval for treatment difference 12.2 - 28.3 , p < 0.001 ) , more achieved a 3.0 g/dL or more increase ( 53 % vs. 36 % , p < 0.001 ) , and more achieved correction ( Hb > or= 12 g/dL ) of anemia ( 73 % vs. 50 % , p < 0.001 ) . Patients treated with ferric carboxymaltose compared to those prescribed ferrous sulfate reported greater gains in vitality and physical function and experienced greater improvement in symptoms of fatigue ( p < 0.05 ) . There were no serious adverse drug events . CONCLUSIONS In patients with iron deficiency anemia due to heavy uterine bleeding , rapid IV administration of large doses of a new iron agent , ferric carboxymaltose , is more effective than oral iron therapy in correcting anemia , replenishing iron stores , and improving quality of life
There was no increased risk of infections with IV iron .
Gastrointestinal AEs were reduced with IV iron .
CONCLUSION Intravenous iron therapy is not associated with an increased risk of SAEs or infections .
Infusion reactions are more pronounced with IV iron
OBJECTIVE To amass all available evidence regarding the safety of intravenous ( IV ) iron preparations to provide a true balance of efficacy and safety .