The articles were grouped into four main categories : decision aids and outcome predictors , electrical cardioversion-based protocol s , antiarrhythmic-based protocol s , and general management protocol s. Conclusion This systematic review is the first study to our knowledge to evaluate the optimal management of symptomatic AF/AFLin  the ED with a direct impact on ED disposition .
There are several viable management strategies that can result in safe discharge from the ED in the right patient population , and decision aids can be utilized to guide selection of appropriate patients for discharge
Introduction Management of  atrial fibrillation ( AF ) and atrial flutter ( AFL )  in the emergency department ( ED ) varies greatly , and there are currently no United States guidelines to guide management with regard to patient disposition after ED treatment .
The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the literature for decision aids to guide disposition of patients with AF/AFLin the ED , and assess potential outcomes associated with different management strategies in the ED .
Treatment of Stable Atrial Fibrillation in the Emergency Department: A Population-Based Comparison of Electrical Direct-Current versus Pharmacological Cardioversion or Conservative Management
Objective : To compare the success rates and short-term complications of three treatment approaches , pharmacological and direct-current cardioversion ( DCC ) , or ‘ wait- and -watch ’ among stable atrial fibrillation ( AF ) patients in the emergency department ( ED ) . Methods : All AF-related ED admissions during a 1-year period were retrospectively review ed , and those meeting criteria of eligibility for immediate cardioversion , based on clinical stability , AF duration and adequacy of anticoagulation , were included . The propensity score approach generalized for the three groups was used to adjust for the observational non-r and omized study nature . Results : Among 374 eligible patients , the rate of successful cardioversion was higher in DCC than in pharmacological or wait- and -watch groups ( 78.2 , 59.2 and 37.9 % respectively , p < 0.001 ) , with corresponding percentages of patients discharged from ED ( 52.9 , 47.9 and 32.1 % , p < 0.01 ) and respective odds ratios of 6.00 , 2.47 and 1 , adjusting for seniority of the treating physician , age , gender and patient comorbidities . DCC was 2.43 times more effective than pharmacological treatment in achieving sinus rhythm ( 95 % confidence interval = 1.36–4.33 , p = 0.003 ) . Rehospitalization within 14 days due to probable AF-treatment-related complications of home-discharged patients was 3.4 % . Conclusions : DCC was found to be the most effective treatment , with few short-term complications following conversion of stable AF patients to sinus rhythm in the ED
The articles were grouped into four main categories : decision aids and outcome predictors , electrical cardioversion-based protocol s , antiarrhythmic-based protocol s , and general management protocol s. Conclusion This systematic review is the first study to our knowledge to evaluate the optimal management of symptomatic AF/AFLin  the ED with a direct impact on ED disposition .
There are several viable management strategies that can result in safe discharge from the ED in the right patient population , and decision aids can be utilized to guide selection of appropriate patients for discharge
Introduction Management of  atrial fibrillation ( AF ) and atrial flutter ( AFL )  in the emergency department ( ED ) varies greatly , and there are currently no United States guidelines to guide management with regard to patient disposition after ED treatment .
The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the literature for decision aids to guide disposition of patients with AF/AFLin the ED , and assess potential outcomes associated with different management strategies in the ED .