In addition , the more CCM-incorporated the information technology-based interventions were , the more improvements there were in HbA1c levels .
CONCLUSIONS Information technology strategies combined with the other elements of chronic care models are associated with improved glycemic control in people with diabetes .
No clinical ly relevant impact was observed on low-density lipoprotein levels and blood pressure , but there was evidence that the cost of care was lower
BACKGROUND Information technology-based interventions are increasingly being used to manage health care .
However , there is conflicting evidence regarding whether these interventions improve outcomes in people with type 2 diabetes .
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta- analysis of clinical trials , assessing the impact of information technology on changes in the levels of hemoglobin A1c ( HbA1c ) and mapping the interventions with chronic care model ( CCM ) elements .
Individualized electronic decision support and reminders to improve diabetes care in the community: COMPETE II randomized trial
Background : Diabetes mellitus is a complex disease with serious complications . Electronic decision support , providing information that is shared and discussed by both patient and physician , encourages timely interventions and may improve the management of this chronic disease . However , it has rarely been tested in community-based primary care . Methods : In this pragmatic r and omized trial , we r and omly assigned adult primary care patients with type 2 diabetes to receive the intervention or usual care .  The intervention involved shared access by the primary care provider and the patient to a Web-based , colour-coded diabetes tracker , which provided sequential monitoring values for 13 diabetes risk factors , their respective targets and brief , prioritized messages of advice . The primary outcome measure was a process composite score . Secondary outcomes included clinical composite scores , quality of life , continuity of care and usability . The outcome assessors were blinded to each patient ’s intervention status . Results : We recruited sequentially 46 primary care providers and then 511 of their patients ( mean age 60.7 [ st and ard deviation 12.5 ] years ) . Mean follow-up was 5.9 months . The process composite score was significantly better for patients in the intervention group than for control patients ( difference 1.27 , 95 % confidence interval [ CI ] 0.79–1.75 , p < 0.001 ) ; 61.7 % ( 156/253 ) of patients in the intervention group , compared with 42.6 % ( 110/258 ) of control patients , showed improvement ( difference 19.1 % , p < 0.001 ) . The clinical composite score also had significantly more variables with improvement for the intervention group ( 0.59 , 95 % CI 0.09–1.10 , p = 0.02 ) , including significantly greater declines in blood pressure ( −3.95 mm Hg systolic and −2.38 mm Hg diastolic ) and glycated hemoglobin ( −0.2 % ) . Patients in the intervention group reported greater satisfaction with their diabetes care . Interpretation : A shared electronic decision-support system to support the primary care of diabetes improved the process of care and some clinical markers of the quality of diabetes care . ( Clinical Trials.gov trial register no. NCT00813085 .
In addition , the more CCM-incorporated the information technology-based interventions were , the more improvements there were in HbA1c levels .
CONCLUSIONS Information technology strategies combined with the other elements of chronic care models are associated with improved glycemic control in people with diabetes .
No clinical ly relevant impact was observed on low-density lipoprotein levels and blood pressure , but there was evidence that the cost of care was lower
BACKGROUND Information technology-based interventions are increasingly being used to manage health care .
However , there is conflicting evidence regarding whether these interventions improve outcomes in people with type 2 diabetes .
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta- analysis of clinical trials , assessing the impact of information technology on changes in the levels of hemoglobin A1c ( HbA1c ) and mapping the interventions with chronic care model ( CCM ) elements .