These data provide both validation and st and ards for other users and indicate the power of the instrument for detecting change in sample population s. CONCLUSIONS The  ODI  remains a valid and vigorous measure and has been a worthwhile outcome measure .
The behavior of the instrument is incompletely understood , particularly in sensitivity to real change
STUDY DESIGN The Oswestry Disability Index ( ODI ) has become one of the principal condition-specific outcome measures used in the management of spinal disorders .
This review is based on publications using the ODI identified from the authors ' personal data bases , the Science Citation Index , and h and search es of Spine and current textbooks of spinal disorders .
OBJECTIVES To review the versions of this instrument , document methods by which it has been vali date d , collate data from scores found in normal and back pain population s , provide curves for power calculations in studies using the ODI , and maintain the ODI as a gold st and ard outcome measure .
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA It has now been 20 years since its original publication .
More than 200 citations exist in the Science Citation Index .
The treatment of acute low back pain--bed rest, exercises, or ordinary activity?
BACKGROUND Bed rest and back-extension exercises are often prescribed for patients with acute low back pain , but the effectiveness of these two competing treatments remains controversial . METHODS We conducted a controlled trial among employees of the city of Helsinki , Finl and , who presented to an occupational health care center with acute , nonspecific low back pain . The patients were r and omly assigned to one of three treatments : bed rest for two days ( 67 patients ) , back-mobilizing exercises ( 52 patients ) , or the continuation of ordinary activities as tolerated ( the control group ; 67 patients ) . Outcomes and costs were assessed after 3 and 12 weeks . RESULTS After 3 and 12 weeks , the patients in the control group had better recovery than those prescribed either bed rest or exercises . There were statistically significant differences favoring the control group in the duration of pain , pain intensity , lumbar flexion , ability to work as measured subjectively , the Oswestry back-disability index , and number of days absent from work . Recovery was slowest among the patients assigned to bed rest . The overall costs of care did not differ significantly among the three groups . CONCLUSIONS Among patients with acute low back pain , continuing ordinary activities within the limits permitted by the pain leads to more rapid recovery than either bed rest or back-mobilizing exercises
These data provide both validation and st and ards for other users and indicate the power of the instrument for detecting change in sample population s. CONCLUSIONS The  ODI  remains a valid and vigorous measure and has been a worthwhile outcome measure .
The behavior of the instrument is incompletely understood , particularly in sensitivity to real change
STUDY DESIGN The Oswestry Disability Index ( ODI ) has become one of the principal condition-specific outcome measures used in the management of spinal disorders .
This review is based on publications using the ODI identified from the authors ' personal data bases , the Science Citation Index , and h and search es of Spine and current textbooks of spinal disorders .
OBJECTIVES To review the versions of this instrument , document methods by which it has been vali date d , collate data from scores found in normal and back pain population s , provide curves for power calculations in studies using the ODI , and maintain the ODI as a gold st and ard outcome measure .
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA It has now been 20 years since its original publication .
More than 200 citations exist in the Science Citation Index .