The articles were grouped into four main categories : decision aids and outcome predictors , electrical cardioversion-based protocol s , antiarrhythmic-based protocol s , and general management protocol s. Conclusion This systematic review is the first study to our knowledge to evaluate the optimal management of symptomatic AF/AFLin  the ED with a direct impact on ED disposition .
There are several viable management strategies that can result in safe discharge from the ED in the right patient population , and decision aids can be utilized to guide selection of appropriate patients for discharge
Introduction Management of  atrial fibrillation ( AF ) and atrial flutter ( AFL )  in the emergency department ( ED ) varies greatly , and there are currently no United States guidelines to guide management with regard to patient disposition after ED treatment .
The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the literature for decision aids to guide disposition of patients with AF/AFLin the ED , and assess potential outcomes associated with different management strategies in the ED .
Validation of the Risk Estimator Decision Aid for Atrial Fibrillation (RED-AF) for predicting 30-day adverse events in emergency department patients with atrial fibrillation.
STUDY OBJECTIVE In the United States , nearly 70 % of emergency department ( ED ) visits for atrial fibrillation result in hospitalization . The incidence of serious 30-day adverse events after an ED evaluation for atrial fibrillation remains low . This study 's goal was to prospect ively vali date our previously reported Risk Estimator Decision Aid for Atrial Fibrillation ( RED-AF ) model for estimating a patient 's risk of experiencing a 30-day adverse event . METHODS This was a prospect i ve cohort study , which enrolled a convenience sample of ED patients presenting with atrial fibrillation .  RED-AF , previously derived from a retrospective cohort of 832 patients , assigns points according to age , sex , coexisting disease ( eg , heart failure , hypertension , chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ) , smoking , home medications ( eg , β-blocker , diuretic ) , physical examination findings ( eg , dyspnea , palpitations , peripheral edema ) , and adequacy of ED ventricular rate control . Primary outcome was occurrence of greater than or equal to 1 atrial fibrillation-related adverse outcome ( ED visits , rehospitalization , cardiovascular complications , death ) within 30 days . We identified a clinical ly relevant threshold and measured RED-AF 's performance in this prospect i ve cohort , assessing its calibration , discrimination , and diagnostic accuracy . RESULTS The study enrolled 497 patients between June 2010 and February 2013 . Of these , 120 ( 24 % ) had greater than or equal to 1 adverse event within 30 days . A RED-AF score of 87 was identified as an optimal threshold , result ing in sensitivity and specificity of 96 % ( 95 % confidence interval [ CI ] 91 % to 98 % ) and 19 % ( 95 % CI 15 % to 23 % ) , respectively . Positive and negative predictive values were 27 % ( 95 % CI 23 % to 32 % ) and 93 % ( 95 % CI 85 % to 97 % ) , respectively . The c statistic for RED-AF was 0.65 ( 95 % CI 0.59 to 0.71 ) . CONCLUSION In this separate validation cohort , RED-AF performed moderately well and similar to the original derivation cohort for identifying the risk of short-term atrial fibrillation-related adverse events in ED patients receiving a diagnosis of atrial fibrillation
The articles were grouped into four main categories : decision aids and outcome predictors , electrical cardioversion-based protocol s , antiarrhythmic-based protocol s , and general management protocol s. Conclusion This systematic review is the first study to our knowledge to evaluate the optimal management of symptomatic AF/AFLin  the ED with a direct impact on ED disposition .
There are several viable management strategies that can result in safe discharge from the ED in the right patient population , and decision aids can be utilized to guide selection of appropriate patients for discharge
Introduction Management of  atrial fibrillation ( AF ) and atrial flutter ( AFL )  in the emergency department ( ED ) varies greatly , and there are currently no United States guidelines to guide management with regard to patient disposition after ED treatment .
The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the literature for decision aids to guide disposition of patients with AF/AFLin the ED , and assess potential outcomes associated with different management strategies in the ED .