We found inconsistent evidence that the use of an arm support or an alternative mouse may or may not reduce the incidence of neck or shoulder MSDs .
For other physical ergonomic interventions there is no evidence of an effect .
For organisational interventions , in the form of supplementary breaks , there is very low- quality evidence of an effect on upper limb discomfort .
For training and multifaceted interventions there is no evidence of an effect on upper limb pain or discomfort .
BACKGROUND Work-related upper limb and neck musculoskeletal disorders ( MSDs ) are one of the most common occupational disorders worldwide .
Studies have shown that the percentage of office workers that suffer from MSDs ranges from 20 to 60 per cent .
The direct and indirect costs of work-related upper limb MSDs have been reported to be high in Europe , Australia , and the United States .
Although ergonomic interventions are likely to reduce the risk of office workers developing work-related upper limb and neck MSDs , the evidence is unclear .
This is an up date of a Cochrane Review which was last published in 2012 .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of physical , cognitive and organisational ergonomic interventions , or combinations of those interventions for the prevention of work-related upper limb and neck MSDs among office workers .
A workplace exercise versus health promotion intervention to prevent and reduce the economic and personal burden of non-specific neck pain in office personnel: protocol of a cluster-randomised controlled trial.
INTRODUCTION Non-specific neck pain is a major burden to industry , yet the impact of introducing a workplace ergonomics and exercise intervention on work productivity and severity of neck pain  in a population of office personnel is unknown . RESEARCH QUESTION Does a combined workplace-based best practice ergonomic and neck exercise program reduce productivity losses and risk of developing neck pain in asymptomatic workers , or decrease severity of neck pain  in symptomatic workers , compared to a best practice ergonomic and general health promotion program ? DESIGN Prospect i ve cluster r and omised controlled trial . PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING Office personnel aged over 18 years , and who work>30 hours/week .  INTERVENTION Individualised best practice ergonomic intervention plus 3 × 20 minute weekly , progressive neck/shoulder girdle exercise group sessions for 12 weeks . CONTROL Individualised best practice ergonomic intervention plus 1-hour weekly health information sessions for 12 weeks . MEASUREMENTS Primary ( productivity loss ) and secondary ( neck pain and disability , muscle performance , and quality of life ) outcome measures will be collected using vali date d scales at baseline , immediate post-intervention and 12 months after commencement . PROCEDURE 640 volunteering office personnel will be r and omly allocated to either an intervention or control arm in work group clusters . ANALYSIS Analysis will be on an ' intent-to-treat ' basis and per protocol . Multilevel , generalised linear models will be used to examine the effect of the intervention on reducing the productivity loss in dollar units ( AUD ) , and severity of neck pain and disability . DISCUSSION The findings of this study will have a direct impact on policies that underpin the prevention and management of neck pain in office personnel
We found inconsistent evidence that the use of an arm support or an alternative mouse may or may not reduce the incidence of neck or shoulder MSDs .
For other physical ergonomic interventions there is no evidence of an effect .
For organisational interventions , in the form of supplementary breaks , there is very low- quality evidence of an effect on upper limb discomfort .
For training and multifaceted interventions there is no evidence of an effect on upper limb pain or discomfort .
BACKGROUND Work-related upper limb and neck musculoskeletal disorders ( MSDs ) are one of the most common occupational disorders worldwide .
Studies have shown that the percentage of office workers that suffer from MSDs ranges from 20 to 60 per cent .
The direct and indirect costs of work-related upper limb MSDs have been reported to be high in Europe , Australia , and the United States .
Although ergonomic interventions are likely to reduce the risk of office workers developing work-related upper limb and neck MSDs , the evidence is unclear .
This is an up date of a Cochrane Review which was last published in 2012 .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of physical , cognitive and organisational ergonomic interventions , or combinations of those interventions for the prevention of work-related upper limb and neck MSDs among office workers .