There is no evidence for a difference in antiepileptic efficacy between phenobarbital and any other compared AED , yet no evidence for absolute efficacy .
No convincing evidence exists for an excess of behavioural adverse effects , over other AEDs , attributable to phenobarbital .
Masked studies of phenobarbital in childhood epilepsy have shown no significant differences in behavioural or cognitive adverse effects compared to other AEDs .
This is in contrast to the excess of such adverse effects reported in studies open to observer bias .
However , the one finding of reduction in cognitive ability associated with phenobarbital treatment for febrile convulsions remains a concern .
INTRODUCTION : Against a background of concern about the safety of new pharmaceutical products , there has been renewed interest in one of the oldest antiepileptic drugs ( AEDs ) , phenobarbital .
Although still in widespread use in developing countries , its popularity has slipped in Western countries over the past century , partly because of controversy about its adverse effect profile .
This critical review examines the evidence supporting its effectiveness and its associated behavioural adverse effects for febrile convulsions and childhood epilepsy .
Antiepileptic drug treatment in a community health care setting in northern Ecuador: a prospective 12-month assessment
The results of a prospect i ve assessment of antiepileptic drug treatment carried out over a 12-month period , in the context of existing community health care in a rural area of a developing country ( a highl and region of northern Ecuador ) , are reported . A house to house survey defined all patients in the area with a history of epileptic seizures , and 192 patients with active epilepsy were recruited into the programme . These patients were r and omised to treatment with carbamazepine or phenobarbital  , and 139 completed the assessment . Treatment was carried out by health visitors and rural doctors , monitored by a team of neurologists , and st and ard treatment regimens were used . Treatment was effective in controlling seizures , 53 % of the patients were rendered entirely seizure free in the second 6 months of therapy , and a further 14 % had a 50 % or more reduction in seizures . These results were similar to those reported in hospital based studies in developed countries . No significant differences were found between the efficacy and safety of phenobarbital or carbamazepine . Antiepileptic drug levels were monitored during the study , and ranges similar to those found in developed countries were recorded . Compliance was good . In view of the successful treatment in this community control programme , we would recommend that community programmes for the control of epilepsy in rural setting s should be given a higher priority in the planning of health care provision than is commonly the case . Finally , the programme afforded the opportunity to study the efficacy of treatment in patients with chronic long-st and ing epilepsy , who had not been previously treated , and the results of this treatment were good
There is no evidence for a difference in antiepileptic efficacy between phenobarbital and any other compared AED , yet no evidence for absolute efficacy .
No convincing evidence exists for an excess of behavioural adverse effects , over other AEDs , attributable to phenobarbital .
Masked studies of phenobarbital in childhood epilepsy have shown no significant differences in behavioural or cognitive adverse effects compared to other AEDs .
This is in contrast to the excess of such adverse effects reported in studies open to observer bias .
However , the one finding of reduction in cognitive ability associated with phenobarbital treatment for febrile convulsions remains a concern .
INTRODUCTION : Against a background of concern about the safety of new pharmaceutical products , there has been renewed interest in one of the oldest antiepileptic drugs ( AEDs ) , phenobarbital .
Although still in widespread use in developing countries , its popularity has slipped in Western countries over the past century , partly because of controversy about its adverse effect profile .
This critical review examines the evidence supporting its effectiveness and its associated behavioural adverse effects for febrile convulsions and childhood epilepsy .