The potential benefit of socket preservation therapies was demonstrated result ing in significantly less vertical and horizontal contraction of the alveolar bone crest .
The scientific evidence does not provide clear guidelines in regards to the type of bio material , or surgical procedure , although a significant positive effect of the flapped surgery was observed .
There are no data available to draw conclusions on the consequences of such benefits on the long-term outcomes of implant therapy
OBJECTIVE This systematic review aims to evaluate the scientific evidence on the efficacy in the surgical protocol s design ed for preserving the alveolar ridge after tooth extraction and to evaluate how these techniques affect the placement of dental implants and the final implant supported restoration .
Ridge preservation with freeze-dried bone allograft and a collagen membrane compared to extraction alone for implant site development: a clinical and histologic study in humans.
BACKGROUND Tooth extraction typically leads to loss of ridge width and height . The primary aim of this 6-month r and omized , controlled , blinded , clinical study was to determine whether ridge preservation would prevent post- extraction resorptive changes as assessed by clinical and histologic parameters . METHODS Twenty-four patients , 10 males and 14 females , aged 28 to 76 ( mean 51.5 + /- 13.6 ) , requiring a non-molar extraction and delayed implant placement were r and omly selected to receive either extraction alone ( EXT ) or ridge preservation ( RP ) using tetracycline hydrated freeze-dried bone allograft ( FDBA ) and a collagen membrane . A replaced flap , which did not completely cover the sockets , was used . Following extraction , horizontal and vertical ridge dimensions were determined using a modified digital caliper and an acrylic stent , respectively . Prior to implant placement , a 2.7 x 6.0 mm trephine core was obtained and preserved in formalin for histologic analysis . RESULTS The width of the RP group decreased from 9.2 + /- 1.2 mm to 8.0 + /- 1.4 mm ( P<0.05 ) , while the width of the EXT group decreased from 9.1 + /- 1.0 mm to 6.4 + /- 2.2 mm ( P<0.05 ) , a difference of 1.6 mm . Both the EXT and RP groups lost ridge width , although an improved result was obtained in the RP group . Most of the resorption occurred from the buccal ; maxillary sites lost more width than m and ibular sites . The vertical change for the RP group was a gain of 1.3 + /- 2.0 mm versus a loss of 0.9 + /- 1.6 mm for the EXT group ( P<0.05 ) , a height difference of 2.2 mm . Histologic analysis revealed more bone in the RP group : about 65 + /- 10 % versus 54 + /- 12 % in the EXT group . The RP group included both vital bone ( 28 % ) and non-vital ( 37 % ) FDBA fragments . CONCLUSIONS Ridge preservation using FDBA and a collagen membrane improved ridge height and width dimensions when compared to extraction alone . These dimensions may be more suitable for implant placement , especially in areas where loss of ridge height would compromise the esthetic result . The quantity of bone observed on histologic analysis was slightly greater in preservation sites , although these sites included both vital and non-vital bone . The most predictable maintenance of ridge width , height , and position was achieved when a ridge preservation procedure was employed
The potential benefit of socket preservation therapies was demonstrated result ing in significantly less vertical and horizontal contraction of the alveolar bone crest .
The scientific evidence does not provide clear guidelines in regards to the type of bio material , or surgical procedure , although a significant positive effect of the flapped surgery was observed .
There are no data available to draw conclusions on the consequences of such benefits on the long-term outcomes of implant therapy
OBJECTIVE This systematic review aims to evaluate the scientific evidence on the efficacy in the surgical protocol s design ed for preserving the alveolar ridge after tooth extraction and to evaluate how these techniques affect the placement of dental implants and the final implant supported restoration .