This moderate to large effect size , showing lower ratings of depressed mood in treated patients compared with controls , implicated HRT as a potential treatment of or prophylactic for depression in menopausal women .
One can generalize from the studies review ed here only with great caution , but there is little evidence to support the use of estradiol to improve mood in nondepressed patients ( not surprisingly ) and some evidence to support the antidepressant efficacy of estradiol in perimenopausal but not postmenopausal women
BACKGROUND Controversy regarding the antidepressant efficacy of hormone replacement therapy ( HRT ) stems almost from its inception and reflects the same method ological inconsistencies that have compromised efforts to determine whether the perimenopause is accompanied by an increase in mood symptoms or depression .
Since this publication , multiple studies have aim ed to discern the relationship between HRT and menopausal mood .
METHODS The purpose of this systematic review is to examine the findings and quality of the evidence amassed since Zweifel and O'Brien 's meta- analysis .
Effects of low-dose, continuous combined estradiol and noretisterone acetate on menopausal quality of life in early postmenopausal women.
OBJECTIVES To describe the effects of low dose hormonal replacement therapy ( LD-HRT ) on quality of life in early postmenopausal women , since the postmenopausal estrogen deprivation in mid age women often brings along a series of changes and symptoms , which may greatly affect quality of life . METHODS Fifty normal postmenopausal women were recruited and r and omly treated with LD-HRT , 17beta-estradiol ( 1 mg/day ) and norethisterone acetate ( 0.5 mg/day ) ( LD-HRT ) or calcium supplement ( controls ) . No significant differences in age , age at menopause , the presence of chronic diseases and socio-economic status were present in the two groups . The Women 's Health Question naire ( WHQ ) , a vali date d quality -of-life instrument for perimenopausal and postmenopausal women , was administered at baseline and after 6 and 12 weeks of treatment in both groups . RESULTS At baseline no significant differences in WHQ scores were present in the two groups . In the control group the scores in all different areas showed no significant modification either after 6 and 12 weeks of observation . Conversely , the LD-HRT group showed a significant decrease in the scores of vasomotor symptoms , somatic symptoms , anxiety/fear , depressed mood and sleep problem items . No effects on memory/concentration and menstrual symptoms areas were evident . CONCLUSION Although quality of life is also and may be mainly influenced by socio-economic and cultural factors , LD-HRT definitively can improve not only vasomotor symptoms , but also more general aspects of physical and psychological well-being of symptomatic postmenopausal women
This moderate to large effect size , showing lower ratings of depressed mood in treated patients compared with controls , implicated HRT as a potential treatment of or prophylactic for depression in menopausal women .
One can generalize from the studies review ed here only with great caution , but there is little evidence to support the use of estradiol to improve mood in nondepressed patients ( not surprisingly ) and some evidence to support the antidepressant efficacy of estradiol in perimenopausal but not postmenopausal women
BACKGROUND Controversy regarding the antidepressant efficacy of hormone replacement therapy ( HRT ) stems almost from its inception and reflects the same method ological inconsistencies that have compromised efforts to determine whether the perimenopause is accompanied by an increase in mood symptoms or depression .
Since this publication , multiple studies have aim ed to discern the relationship between HRT and menopausal mood .
METHODS The purpose of this systematic review is to examine the findings and quality of the evidence amassed since Zweifel and O'Brien 's meta- analysis .