Our review provides anchor-based MID estimates , as well as a rating of their credibility , for PROMs for patients with shoulder conditions .
The MID estimates inform the interpretation for a linked systematic review and guideline addressing subacromial decompression surgery for shoulder pain , and could also prove useful for authors addressing other interventions for shoulder problems .
OBJECTIVES To identify credible anchor-based minimal important differences ( MIDs ) for  patient-reported outcome measures  ( PROMs ) relevant to a BMJ Rapid Recommendations addressing subacromial decompression surgery for shoulder pain .
Investigating minimal clinically important difference for Constant score in patients undergoing rotator cuff surgery.
BACKGROUND The minimal clinical ly important difference ( MCID ) is increasingly used to evaluate treatment effectiveness . The MCID for the Constant score has not been previously reported . MATERIAL S AND METHODS A prospect ively collected cohort of 802 consecutive shoulders with arthroscopically treated partial- or full-thickness rotator cuff tears was analyzed . The Constant score was measured preoperatively and at 3 months and 1 year postoperatively . At follow-up visits , the patients were asked a simple 2-stage question : Is the shoulder better or worse after the operation compared with the preoperative state ? This single 2-level question was used as an indicator of patient satisfaction and as an anchor to calculate the  MCID  for the Constant score . RESULTS At 1 year , 781 ( 97.4 % ) patients ( 474 men , 307 women ) were available for follow-up . The preoperative Constant score was 53.1 ( SD 17.2 ) in all patients , 56.2 ( SD 17.4 ) in male patients , and 48.2 ( SD 15.6 ) in female patients . Postoperatively at 3 months , the scores were 61.7 ( SD 16.4 ) in all patients , 65.1 ( SD 16.1 ) in male patients , and 56.8 ( SD 15.5 ) in female patients . At 1 year , the scores were 75.9 ( SD 15.2 ) in all patients , 79.0 ( SD 14.9 ) in male patients , and 71.0 ( SD 14.3 ) in female patients . At 3 months postoperatively , 92.2 % of male patients and 87.2 % of female patients were satisfied with the outcome ( P = .027 ) ; at 1 year , the satisfaction was 93.2 % and 89.5 % , respectively ( P = .067 ) . Five different statistical approaches yielded 5 different MCID estimates ( range , 2 - 16 ) . The 3-month mean change estimate of MCID was 10.4 points . CONCLUSION Our study demonstrates an MCID estimate of 10.4 points as the threshold for the Constant score in patients with rotator cuff tear . LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Basic science study , validation of outcomes instruments/classification systems
Our review provides anchor-based MID estimates , as well as a rating of their credibility , for PROMs for patients with shoulder conditions .
The MID estimates inform the interpretation for a linked systematic review and guideline addressing subacromial decompression surgery for shoulder pain , and could also prove useful for authors addressing other interventions for shoulder problems .
OBJECTIVES To identify credible anchor-based minimal important differences ( MIDs ) for  patient-reported outcome measures  ( PROMs ) relevant to a BMJ Rapid Recommendations addressing subacromial decompression surgery for shoulder pain .