Pooled net change in systolic blood pressure ( 16 trials ) was -1.86 ( 95 % CI -3.17 to -0.55 ; p=0.01 ) mm Hg ; diastolic blood pressure ( 15 trials ) , -1.53 ( -2.43 to -0.62 ; p=0.001 ) mm Hg ; body mass index ( 14 trials ) , -0.13 ( -0.26 to -0.01 ; p=0.04 ) kg/m2 ; serum total cholesterol ( 14 trials ) , -0.13 ( -0.19 to -0.07 ; p<0.001 ) mmol/L. There was no significant association between interventions with a reported theoretical basis and improved intervention outcomes .
No association was observed between intervention intensity ( number of sessions and intervention duration ) and intervention outcomes .
MHBC interventions delivered to CVD-free participants in primary care did not appear to have quantitatively important effects on CVD risk factors .
BACKGROUND It is uncertain whether multiple health behaviour change ( MHBC ) interventions are effective for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease ( CVD ) in primary care .
Randomized controlled trial on cardiovascular risk management by practice nurses supported by self-monitoring in primary care
Background Treatment goals for cardiovascular risk management are generally not achieved . Specialized practice nurses are increasingly facilitating the work of general practitioners and self-monitoring devices have been developed as counseling aid . The aim of this study was to compare st and ard treatment supported by self-monitoring with st and ard treatment without self-monitoring , both conducted by practice nurses , on cardiovascular risk and separate risk factors . Methods Men aged 50–75 years and women aged 55–75 years without a history of cardiovascular disease or diabetes , but with a SCORE 10-year risk of cardiovascular mortality ≥5 % and at least one treatable risk factor ( smoking , hypertension , lack of physical activity or overweight ) , were r and omized into two groups . The control group received st and ard treatment according to guidelines , the intervention group additionally received pro-active counseling and self-monitoring ( pedometer , weighing scale and / or blood pressure device ) . After one year treatment effect on 179 participants was analyzed . Results SCORE risk assessment decreased 1.6 % ( 95 % CI 1.0–2.2 ) for the control group and 1.8 % ( 1.2–2.4 ) for the intervention group , difference between groups was .2 % ( −.6–1.1 ) . Most risk factors tended to improve in both groups . The number of visits was higher and visits took more time in the intervention group ( 4.9 ( SD2.2 ) vs. 2.6 ( SD1.5 ) visits p < .001 and 27 ( P25 –P75:20–33 ) vs. 23 ( P25 –P75:19–30 ) minutes/visit p = .048 ) . Conclusions In both groups cardiovascular risk decreased significantly after one year of treatment by practice nurses . No additional effect of basing the pro-active counseling on self-monitoring was found , despite the extra time investment . Trial registration trialregister.nl
Pooled net change in systolic blood pressure ( 16 trials ) was -1.86 ( 95 % CI -3.17 to -0.55 ; p=0.01 ) mm Hg ; diastolic blood pressure ( 15 trials ) , -1.53 ( -2.43 to -0.62 ; p=0.001 ) mm Hg ; body mass index ( 14 trials ) , -0.13 ( -0.26 to -0.01 ; p=0.04 ) kg/m2 ; serum total cholesterol ( 14 trials ) , -0.13 ( -0.19 to -0.07 ; p<0.001 ) mmol/L. There was no significant association between interventions with a reported theoretical basis and improved intervention outcomes .
No association was observed between intervention intensity ( number of sessions and intervention duration ) and intervention outcomes .
MHBC interventions delivered to CVD-free participants in primary care did not appear to have quantitatively important effects on CVD risk factors .
BACKGROUND It is uncertain whether multiple health behaviour change ( MHBC ) interventions are effective for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease ( CVD ) in primary care .