Sensitivity analysis indicates that from both perspectives the service is very cost effective and may be cost saving .
CONCLUSIONS These results make alcohol screening and counseling one of the highest-ranking preventive services among the 25 effective services evaluated using st and ardized methods .
BACKGROUND The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force ( USPSTF ) has recommended screening and behavioral counseling interventions in primary care to reduce alcohol misuse .
This study was design ed to develop a st and ardized rating for the clinical ly preventable burden and cost effectiveness of complying with that recommendation that would allow comparisons across many recommended services .
Promoting brief alcohol intervention by nurses in primary care: a cluster randomised controlled trial.
This trial evaluated the clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of strategies promoting screening and brief alcohol intervention ( SBI ) by nurses in primary care . R and omisation was at the level of the practice and the interventions were : written guidelines ( controls , n=76 ) ; outreach training ( n=68 ) ; and training plus telephone-based support ( n=68 ) . After 3 months , just 39 % of controls implemented the SBI programme compared to 74 % of nurses in trained practice s and 71 % in trained and supported practice s. Controls also screened fewer patients and delivered fewer brief interventions to risk drinkers than other colleagues . However , there was a trade-off between the extent and the appropriateness of brief intervention delivery with controls displaying the least errors in overall patient management . Thus cost-effectiveness ratios ( cost per patient appropriately treated ) were similar between the three strategies . Given the potential for anxiety due to misdirected advice about alcohol-related risk , the balance of evidence favoured the use of written guidelines to promote SBI by nurses in primary care
Sensitivity analysis indicates that from both perspectives the service is very cost effective and may be cost saving .
CONCLUSIONS These results make alcohol screening and counseling one of the highest-ranking preventive services among the 25 effective services evaluated using st and ardized methods .
BACKGROUND The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force ( USPSTF ) has recommended screening and behavioral counseling interventions in primary care to reduce alcohol misuse .
This study was design ed to develop a st and ardized rating for the clinical ly preventable burden and cost effectiveness of complying with that recommendation that would allow comparisons across many recommended services .