There is suggestive but inconclusive evidence from the trials of a benefit in the use of brief interventions for risk factor modification in patients with coronary heart disease .
This review , however , supports the concept that brief interventions for patients with coronary heart disease can have beneficial effects on risk factor modification and consequently on progression of coronary heart disease .
Further trials using larger sample sizes need to be undertaken to demonstrate the benefits of brief structured intervention targeted at the modification of single or multiple risk factors
BACKGROUND The physical and psychosocial benefits of participation in cardiac rehabilitation following a coronary event have well been established .
Despite these benefits there is strong evidence that participation in traditional cardiac rehabilitation programs remains low .
Various models of cardiac rehabilitation have been implemented including the use of brief structured interventions to enable modification of coronary risk factors .
OBJECTIVES The objective of this review was to determine the effect of brief structured interventions on risk factor modification in patients with coronary heart disease .
A randomized controlled trial of smoking cessation counseling after myocardial infarction.
BACKGROUND Smoking cessation after myocardial infa rct ion ( MI ) has been associated with a 50 % reduction in mortality but in-hospital smoking cessation interventions are rarely part of routine clinical practice . METHODS One hundred cigarette smokers consecutively admitted during 1996 with MI were assigned to  minimal care or to a hospital-based smoking cessation program . Intervention consisted of bedside cessation counseling followed by seven telephone calls over the 6 months following discharge . Primary outcomes were abstinence rates measured at 6 months and 1 year post-discharge . RESULTS At follow-up , 43 and 34 % of participants in minimal care and 67 and 55 % of participants in intervention were abstinent at 6 and 12 months . respectively ( P<0.05 ) . Abstinence rates were calculated assuming that participants lost to attrition were smokers at follow-up . Intervention and self-efficacy were independent predictors of smoking status at follow-up . Low self-efficacy combined with no intervention result ed in a 93 % relapse rate by 1 year ( P<0.01 ) . CONCLUSIONS A hospital-based smoking cessation program consisting of inpatient counseling and telephone follow-up substantially increases smoking abstinence 1 year after discharge in patients post-MI . Patients with low self-efficacy are almost certain to relapse without intervention . Such smoking cessation programs should be part of the management of patients with MI
There is suggestive but inconclusive evidence from the trials of a benefit in the use of brief interventions for risk factor modification in patients with coronary heart disease .
This review , however , supports the concept that brief interventions for patients with coronary heart disease can have beneficial effects on risk factor modification and consequently on progression of coronary heart disease .
Further trials using larger sample sizes need to be undertaken to demonstrate the benefits of brief structured intervention targeted at the modification of single or multiple risk factors
BACKGROUND The physical and psychosocial benefits of participation in cardiac rehabilitation following a coronary event have well been established .
Despite these benefits there is strong evidence that participation in traditional cardiac rehabilitation programs remains low .
Various models of cardiac rehabilitation have been implemented including the use of brief structured interventions to enable modification of coronary risk factors .
OBJECTIVES The objective of this review was to determine the effect of brief structured interventions on risk factor modification in patients with coronary heart disease .