Compared with an energy-restricted SP diet , an isocalorically prescribed HP diet provides modest benefits for reductions in body weight , FM , and triglycerides and for mitigating reductions in FFM and REE
BACKGROUND It is currently unclear whether altering the carbohydrate-to-protein ratio of low-fat , energy-restricted diets augments weight loss and cardiometabolic risk markers .
OBJECTIVE The objective was to conduct a systematic review and meta- analysis of studies that compared energy-restricted , isocaloric , high-protein , low-fat ( HP ) diets with st and ard-protein , low-fat ( SP ) diets on weight loss , body composition , resting energy expenditure ( REE ) , satiety and appetite , and cardiometabolic risk factors .
Moderate carbohydrate, moderate protein weight loss diet reduces cardiovascular disease risk compared to high carbohydrate, low protein diet in obese adults: A randomized clinical trial
Background To evaluate the metabolic effects of two weight loss diets differing in macronutrient composition on features of dyslipidemia and post-pr and ial insulin ( INS ) response to a meal challenge in overweight/obese individuals . Methods This study was a parallel-arm r and omized 4 mo weight loss trial . Adults ( n = 50 , 47 ± 7 y ) matched on BMI ( 33.6 ± 0.6 kg/m2 , P = 0.79 )  consumed energy restricted diets ( deficit ~500 kcal/d ) : PRO ( 1.6 g.kg-1.d-1 protein and < 170 g/d carbohydrate ) or CHO ( 0.8 g.kg-1.d-1 protein and > 220 g/d carbohydrate ) for 4 mos . Meal challenges of respective diets were utilized for determination of blood lipids and post-pr and ial INS and glucose response at the beginning and end of the study . Results There was a trend for PRO to lose more weight ( -9.1 % vs. -7.3 % , P = 0.07 ) with a significant reduction in percent fat mass compared to CHO ( -8.7 % vs. -5.7 % ; P = 0.03 ) . PRO also favored reductions in triacylglycerol ( -34 % vs. -14 % ; P < 0.05 ) and increases in HDL-C ( + 5 % vs. -3 % ; P = 0.05 ) ; however , CHO favored reduction in LDL-C ( -7 % vs. + 2.5 % ; P < 0.05 ) . INS responses to the meal challenge were improved in PRO compared to CHO ( P < 0.05 ) at both 1 hr ( -34.3 % vs. -1.0 % ) and 2 hr ( -9.2 % vs. + 46.2 % ) , an effect that remained significant after controlling for weight or fat loss ( both P < 0.05 ) . Conclusion A weight loss diet with moderate carbohydrate , moderate protein results in more favorable changes in body composition , dyslipidemia , and post-pr and ial INS response compared to a high carbohydrate , low protein diet suggesting an additional benefit beyond weight management to include augmented risk reduction for metabolic disease
Compared with an energy-restricted SP diet , an isocalorically prescribed HP diet provides modest benefits for reductions in body weight , FM , and triglycerides and for mitigating reductions in FFM and REE
BACKGROUND It is currently unclear whether altering the carbohydrate-to-protein ratio of low-fat , energy-restricted diets augments weight loss and cardiometabolic risk markers .
OBJECTIVE The objective was to conduct a systematic review and meta- analysis of studies that compared energy-restricted , isocaloric , high-protein , low-fat ( HP ) diets with st and ard-protein , low-fat ( SP ) diets on weight loss , body composition , resting energy expenditure ( REE ) , satiety and appetite , and cardiometabolic risk factors .