Compared with aspirin , thienopyridines significantly reduced gastrointestinal adverse effects .
However , thienopyridines increased the odds of skin rash and diarrhoea , ticlopidine more than clopidogrel .
Allocation to ticlopidine , but not clopidogrel , significantly increased the odds of neutropenia .
The thienopyridine derivatives are at least as effective as aspirin in preventing serious vascular events in patients at high risk , and possibly somewhat more so .
However , the size of any additional benefit is uncertain and could be negligible .
Clopidogrel has a more favourable adverse effects profile than ticlopidine and so is the thienopyridine of choice .
BACKGROUND Aspirin is the most widely studied and prescribed antiplatelet agent for preventing serious vascular events , reducing the odds of such events among high vascular risk patients by about a quarter .
Thienopyridine derivatives inhibit platelet activation by a different mechanism and so may be more effective .
OBJECTIVES To determine the effectiveness and safety of thienopyridine derivatives ( ticlopidine and clopidogrel ) versus aspirin for preventing serious vascular events ( stroke , myocardial infa rct ion ( MI ) or vascular death ) in patients at high risk , and specifically in patients with a previous TIA or ischaemic stroke .
Aspirin plus dipyridamole versus aspirin alone after cerebral ischaemia of arterial origin (ESPRIT): randomised controlled trial.
BACKGROUND Results of trials of aspirin and dipyridamole combined versus aspirin alone for the secondary prevention of  vascular events after ischaemic stroke of presumed arterial origin are inconsistent . Our aim was to resolve this uncertainty . METHODS We did a r and omised controlled trial in which we assigned patients to aspirin ( 30 - 325 mg daily ) with ( n=1363 ) or without ( n=1376 ) dipyridamole ( 200 mg twice daily ) within 6 months of a transient ischaemic attack or minor stroke of presumed arterial origin . Our primary outcome event was the composite of death from all vascular causes , non-fatal stroke , non-fatal myocardial infa rct ion , or major bleeding complication , whichever happened first . Treatment was open , but auditing of outcome events was blinded . Primary analysis was by intention to treat . This study is registered as an International St and ard R and omised Controlled Trial ( number IS RCT N73824458 ) and with ( NCT00161070 ) . FINDINGS Mean follow-up was 3.5 years ( SD 2.0 ) . Median aspirin dose was 75 mg in both treatment groups ( range 30 - 325 ) ; extended-release dipyridamole was used by 83 % ( n=1131 ) of patients on the combination regimen . Primary outcome events arose in 173 ( 13 % ) patients on aspirin and dipyridamole and in 216 ( 16 % ) on aspirin alone ( hazard ratio 0.80 , 95 % CI 0.66 - 0.98 ; absolute risk reduction 1.0 % per year , 95 % CI 0.1 - 1.8 ) . Addition of the ESPRIT data to the meta- analysis of previous trials result ed in an overall risk ratio for the composite of vascular death , stroke , or myocardial infa rct ion of 0.82 ( 95 % CI 0.74 - 0.91 ) . Patients on aspirin and dipyridamole  discontinued trial medication more often than those on aspirin alone ( 470 vs 184 ) , mainly because of headache . INTERPRETATION The ESPRIT results , combined with the results of previous trials , provide sufficient evidence to prefer the combination regimen of aspirin plus dipyridamole over aspirin alone as antithrombotic therapy after cerebral ischaemia of arterial origin
Compared with aspirin , thienopyridines significantly reduced gastrointestinal adverse effects .
However , thienopyridines increased the odds of skin rash and diarrhoea , ticlopidine more than clopidogrel .
Allocation to ticlopidine , but not clopidogrel , significantly increased the odds of neutropenia .
The thienopyridine derivatives are at least as effective as aspirin in preventing serious vascular events in patients at high risk , and possibly somewhat more so .
However , the size of any additional benefit is uncertain and could be negligible .
Clopidogrel has a more favourable adverse effects profile than ticlopidine and so is the thienopyridine of choice .
BACKGROUND Aspirin is the most widely studied and prescribed antiplatelet agent for preventing serious vascular events , reducing the odds of such events among high vascular risk patients by about a quarter .
Thienopyridine derivatives inhibit platelet activation by a different mechanism and so may be more effective .
OBJECTIVES To determine the effectiveness and safety of thienopyridine derivatives ( ticlopidine and clopidogrel ) versus aspirin for preventing serious vascular events ( stroke , myocardial infa rct ion ( MI ) or vascular death ) in patients at high risk , and specifically in patients with a previous TIA or ischaemic stroke .