Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
A pilot randomized controlled trial of a commercial diet and exercise weight loss program in minority breast cancer survivors.
OBJECTIVE Obesity is associated with poorer breast cancer outcomes and losing weight postdiagnosis may improve survival . As Hispanic and black women have poorer breast cancer prognosis than non-Hispanic whites diagnosed at similar age and stage , and have higher rates of obesity , effective weight loss strategies are needed . We piloted a r and omized , waitlist-controlled , crossover study to examine the effects and feasibility of the commercial Curves weight loss program among Hispanic , African American and Afro-Caribbean breast cancer survivors . DESIGN AND METHODS Women with stage 0-IIIa breast cancer ≥ 6 months posttreatment , sedentary , and BMI ≥ 25 kg/m(2 ) were r and omized to the immediate arm ( IA ) : 6 months of the Curves program followed by 6 months of observation ; or the waitlist control arm ( WCA ) : 6 months of observation followed by 6 months of the Curves program . The Curves program uses a 30-min exercise circuit and a high-vegetable/low-fat/calorie-restricted diet . RESULTS A total of 42 women enrolled ( 79 % Hispanic , 21 % black ) , mean age 51 ( range 32 - 69 ) and mean BMI 33.2(± 5.9 ) kg/m(2 ) ; 91 % were retained at month 12 . At month 6 , women in the IA lost an average 3.3 % ( ± 3.5 % ) of body weight ( range : 1.7 % gain to 10.6 % loss ) , as compared with 1.8 % ( ± 2.9 % ) weight loss in the WCA ( P = 0.04 ) . At month 12 , on average women in the IA regained some but not all of the weight lost during the first 6 months ( P = 0.02 ) . CONCLUSIONS Minority breast cancer survivors were recruited and retained in a weight loss study . Six months of the Curves program result ed in moderate weight loss , but weight loss was not maintained postintervention . Future interventions should identify methods to increase uptake and maintenance of weight loss behaviors
Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?