Educational interventions did not seem to have a positive impact on HbA1c , systolic blood pressure or lipid profiles .
The use of telemedicine , clinician reminders and feedback showed mixed results but there was a level of consistency in improvement in HbA1c when multifaceted interventions on multidisciplinary teams were implemented .
Targeting general or family physicians was largely ineffective in improving the cardiovascular risk factors considered , except when using a computer application on insulin h and ling of type 2 diabetes or customised simulated cases with feedbacks .
Similarly , interventions targeting nurses did not improve outcomes compared to st and ard care .
Multifaceted professional interventions were more effective than single interventions targeting single primary or community care professionals in improving glycaemic control
OBJECTIVE To review the interventions targeting primary care or community based professionals on glycaemic and cardiovascular risk factor control in people with diabetes .
Effect of a pharmaceutical care program on vascular risk factors in type 2 diabetes: the Fremantle Diabetes Study.
OBJECTIVE To examine the effect of a 12-month pharmaceutical care ( PC ) program on  vascular risk in type 2 diabetes . RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We recruited 198 community-based patients r and omized to PC or usual care . PC patients had face-to-face goal -directed medication and lifestyle counseling at baseline and at 6 and 12 months plus 6-weekly telephone assessment s and provision of other educational material . Clinical , biochemical , and medication-related data were sent regularly to each patient 's physician(s ) . The main outcome measure was change in HbA(1c ) . A diabetes-specific risk engine was used to estimate changes in 10-year coronary heart disease ( CHD ) and stroke risk in patients without a history of cardiovascular disease . RESULTS At total of 180 patients ( 91 % ) completed the study .  Mean ( 95 % CI ) reductions were greater in PC case subjects ( n = 92 ) than control subjects ( n = 88 ) for HbA(1c ) ( -0.5 % [ 95 % CI -0.7 to -0.3 ] vs. 0 [ -0.2 to 0.2 ] ) and systolic ( -14 mmHg [ -19 to -9 ] vs. -7 [ -11 to -2 ] ) and diastolic ( -5 mmHg [ -8 to -3 ] vs. -2 [ -4 to 1 ] ) blood pressure ( P < or = 0.043 ) . The improvement in HbA(1c ) persisted after adjustment for baseline value and demographic and treatment-specific variables . The median ( interquartile range ) 10-year estimated risk of a first CHD event decreased in the PC case subjects ( 25.1 % [ 15.6 - 36.2 ] to 20.3 [ 14.6 - 30.2 ] ; n = 42 , P = 0.002 ) but not in the control subjects ( 26.1 % [ 17.2 - 39.4 ] vs. 26.4 [ 16.7 - 38.0 ] ; n = 52 , P = 0.17 ) . CONCLUSIONS A 12-month PC program in type 2 diabetes reduced glycemia and blood pressure . Pharmacist involvement contributed to improvement in HbA(1c ) independently of pharmacotherapeutic changes . PC could prove a valuable component of community-based multidisciplinary diabetes care
Educational interventions did not seem to have a positive impact on HbA1c , systolic blood pressure or lipid profiles .
The use of telemedicine , clinician reminders and feedback showed mixed results but there was a level of consistency in improvement in HbA1c when multifaceted interventions on multidisciplinary teams were implemented .
Targeting general or family physicians was largely ineffective in improving the cardiovascular risk factors considered , except when using a computer application on insulin h and ling of type 2 diabetes or customised simulated cases with feedbacks .
Similarly , interventions targeting nurses did not improve outcomes compared to st and ard care .
Multifaceted professional interventions were more effective than single interventions targeting single primary or community care professionals in improving glycaemic control
OBJECTIVE To review the interventions targeting primary care or community based professionals on glycaemic and cardiovascular risk factor control in people with diabetes .