This combination seems to be more efficacious in terms of several outcome variables in patients whose prostate volume is between 30 ml and 40 ml when treatment is maintained for > 1 yr ; when given for < 1 yr , α1-blockers alone are just as effective .
The combination of α1-blocker/5-ARI shows a slightly increased rate of adverse events .
It remains unknown whether its safety and superiority over either drug as monotherapy are sustained after > 6 yr .
The α1-blocker/muscarinic receptor antagonist ( antimuscarinic ) combination was most frequently assessed as an add-on therapy to already existing α1-blocker therapy .
Inconsistent data derive from heterogeneous study population s and different study design s. Currently , the α1-blocker/antimuscarinic combination appears to be a second-line add-on for patients with insufficient symptom relief after monotherapy .
The combination seems to be safe in men with postvoid residual < 200 ml .
The α1-blocker/phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor combination is a new treatment option with only preliminary reports .
CONCLUSIONS An α1-blocker/5-ARI combination is beneficial for patients whose prostate volume is between 30 ml and 40 ml when medical treatment is intended for > 1 yr .
Based on short-term follow-up studies , add-on of antimuscarinics to α1-blockers is an option when postvoid residual is < 200 ml
BACKGROUND Several drugs are approved for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms ( LUTS ) in men , but these are mostly used by clinicians as monotherapies .
The combination of different compounds , each of which targets a different aspect of LUTS , seems appealing .
However , only few clinical trials have evaluated the effects of combination therapies .
OBJECTIVE This systematic review analyzes the efficacy and adverse events of combination therapies for male LUTS .
Combination therapy with doxazosin and tenoxicam for the management of lower urinary tract symptoms.
OBJECTIVE To compare the efficacy and safety of a combination therapy , doxazosin plus tenoxicam , and doxazosin alone for lower urinary tract symptoms ( LUTS ) caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia ( BPH ) , as various combination therapies increase the efficacy of medical therapy . Alpha blocker agents have been widely used for the treatment of LUTS secondary to BPH . METHOD Fifty-seven patients complaining of LUTS secondary to BPH were enrolled in this clinical trial . Patients were r and omly assigned to receive doxazosin 4 mg or doxazosin 4 mg plus tenoxicam 20 mg treatment . Patients were evaluated for BPH according to the European Association of Urology and American Urological Association clinical guidelines . In addition , patients were assessed with Overactive Bladder Symptom Score ( OABSS ) and International Index of Erectile Function ( IIEF ) . Patients were reevaluated after a 6-week treatment course . The International Prostatic Symptom Score ( IPSS ) , IPSS- Quality of Life ( IPSS-QoL ) , maximal urinary flow rates ( Q(max ) ) , and average urinary flow rates ( AFR ) were determined at baseline and again at 6 weeks as efficacy parameters . RESULTS The total IPSS , IPSS-QoL , and OABSS decreased significantly in both tenoxicam plus doxazosin group and doxazosin alone group compared with baseline ( P < .01 ) . Also , Q(max ) and AFR significantly improved in both groups ( P < .01 ) . The improvements in IPSS , IPSS-QoL , and OABSS were significantly better in patients treated with combination therapy ( P < .05 ) . CONCLUSIONS COX-2 inhibitors in combination with an alpha blocker may increase the effectiveness of the therapy for LUTS secondary to BPH without significant effects on side effect profile
This combination seems to be more efficacious in terms of several outcome variables in patients whose prostate volume is between 30 ml and 40 ml when treatment is maintained for > 1 yr ; when given for < 1 yr , α1-blockers alone are just as effective .
The combination of α1-blocker/5-ARI shows a slightly increased rate of adverse events .
It remains unknown whether its safety and superiority over either drug as monotherapy are sustained after > 6 yr .
The α1-blocker/muscarinic receptor antagonist ( antimuscarinic ) combination was most frequently assessed as an add-on therapy to already existing α1-blocker therapy .
Inconsistent data derive from heterogeneous study population s and different study design s. Currently , the α1-blocker/antimuscarinic combination appears to be a second-line add-on for patients with insufficient symptom relief after monotherapy .
The combination seems to be safe in men with postvoid residual < 200 ml .
The α1-blocker/phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor combination is a new treatment option with only preliminary reports .
CONCLUSIONS An α1-blocker/5-ARI combination is beneficial for patients whose prostate volume is between 30 ml and 40 ml when medical treatment is intended for > 1 yr .
Based on short-term follow-up studies , add-on of antimuscarinics to α1-blockers is an option when postvoid residual is < 200 ml
BACKGROUND Several drugs are approved for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms ( LUTS ) in men , but these are mostly used by clinicians as monotherapies .
The combination of different compounds , each of which targets a different aspect of LUTS , seems appealing .
However , only few clinical trials have evaluated the effects of combination therapies .
OBJECTIVE This systematic review analyzes the efficacy and adverse events of combination therapies for male LUTS .