For hip fracture , at a 15 % relative risk , the effect estimate lay between the futility boundary and the inferior boundary , meaning there is reliable evidence that vitamin D supplementation does not reduce hip fractures by this amount , but uncertainty remains as to whether it might increase hip fractures .
The effect estimate lay within the futility boundary at thresholds of 0·5 % for total hip , forearm , and total body bone mineral density , and 1·0 % for lumbar spine and femoral neck , providing reliable evidence that vitamin D does not alter these outcomes by these amounts .
INTERPRETATION Our findings suggest that vitamin D supplementation does not prevent fractures or falls , or have clinical ly meaningful effects on bone mineral density .
There were no differences between the effects of higher and lower doses of vitamin D. There is little justification to use vitamin D supplements to maintain or improve musculoskeletal health .
BACKGROUND The effects of vitamin D on fractures , falls , and bone mineral density are uncertain , particularly for high vitamin D doses .
We aim ed to determine the effect of vitamin D supplementation on fractures , falls , and bone density .
Vitamin D supplementation and bone mineral density in early postmenopausal women.
BACKGROUND Increased vitamin D intake may preserve or increase bone mineral density ( BMD ) in older persons . OBJECTIVE A 2-y double-blind study was undertaken to determine whether weekly administration of 10 000 units of vitamin D(2 ) maintained or increased BMD in younger postmenopausal women more efficiently than did calcium supplements alone . DESIGN One hundred eighty-seven women who were > or= 1 y postmenopausal were r and omly assigned to take either 1000 mg Ca/d after the evening meal or 1000 mg Ca/d plus 10 000 U vitamin D(2)/wk in a double-blind , placebo-controlled format . The BMD of the proximal forearm , lumbar spine , femoral neck , Ward 's triangle , and femoral trochanter was measured at 6-mo intervals by osteodensitometry . RESULTS During the 2-y period , there was no significant difference in the change in BMD at any site between the subjects taking calcium supplements and those taking calcium plus vitamin D(2 ) . Both groups significantly ( P < 0.005 ) gained BMD in Ward 's triangle and the femoral trochanter but significantly ( P < 0.005 ) lost bone in the proximal radius . There was no significant change in the lumbar spine or femoral neck BMD . CONCLUSION In younger postmenopausal women ( age : 56 y ) whose average baseline serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration was well within the normal range , the addition of 10 000 U vitamin D(2)/wk to calcium supplementation at 1000 mg/d did not confer benefits on BMD beyond those achieved with calcium supplementation alone
For hip fracture , at a 15 % relative risk , the effect estimate lay between the futility boundary and the inferior boundary , meaning there is reliable evidence that vitamin D supplementation does not reduce hip fractures by this amount , but uncertainty remains as to whether it might increase hip fractures .
The effect estimate lay within the futility boundary at thresholds of 0·5 % for total hip , forearm , and total body bone mineral density , and 1·0 % for lumbar spine and femoral neck , providing reliable evidence that vitamin D does not alter these outcomes by these amounts .
INTERPRETATION Our findings suggest that vitamin D supplementation does not prevent fractures or falls , or have clinical ly meaningful effects on bone mineral density .
There were no differences between the effects of higher and lower doses of vitamin D. There is little justification to use vitamin D supplements to maintain or improve musculoskeletal health .
BACKGROUND The effects of vitamin D on fractures , falls , and bone mineral density are uncertain , particularly for high vitamin D doses .
We aim ed to determine the effect of vitamin D supplementation on fractures , falls , and bone density .