D. Restoration of sinus rhythm for monophasic vs. biphasic waveforms .
Another study showed that PVI result ed in long-term restoration
Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is a major public health problem in the United States .
More than 2.3 million Americans are estimated to have AF ( 1 ) .
The known association between AF and substantial mortality , morbidity , and health care costs compounds the effect of this condition .
Not only is the risk for death in patients with AF twice that of patients without it , but AF can result in myocardial ischemia and infa rct ion , exacerbate heart failure ( HF ) , and cause tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy if the ventricular rate is not well-controlled ( 25 ) .
The most dreaded complication of AF is thromboembolism , especially stroke ( 6 ) .
In some patients , AF or therapies to manage this condition can severely depreciate quality of life ( 710 ) .
Furthermore , the management of AF and its complications is responsible for nearly $ 16 billion in additional costs to the U.S. health care system per year ( 11 ) .
We conducted this systematic review to evaluate the comparative safety and effectiveness of rate- versus rhythm-control strategies ;  medications used for ventricular rate control ; strict versus more lenient rate-control strategies ; nonpharmacologic rate-control therapies  versus medications ; electrical cardioversion and antiarrhythmic medications  for restoration of sinus rhythm ;  and  catheter ablation , surgical ablation , and antiarrhythmic medications  for maintenance of sinus rhythm .
A randomized trial to assess catheter ablation versus rate control in the management of persistent atrial fibrillation in heart failure.
OBJECTIVES This study sought to compare catheter ablation with rate control for persistent atrial fibrillation ( AF ) in heart failure ( HF ) . BACKGROUND The optimal therapy for AF in HF is unclear . Drug-based rhythm control has not proved clinical ly beneficial . Catheter ablation improves cardiac function in patients with HF , but impact on physiological performance has not been formally evaluated in a r and omized trial . METHODS In a r and omized , open-label , blinded-endpoint clinical trial , adults with symptomatic HF , radionuclide left ventricular ejection fraction ( EF ) ≤35 % , and persistent AF were assigned to undergo catheter ablation or rate control . Primary outcome was 12-month change in peak oxygen consumption . Secondary endpoints were quality of life , B-type natriuretic peptide , 6-min walk distance , and EF . Results were analyzed by intention-to-treat . RESULTS Fifty-two patients ( age 63 ± 9 years , EF 24 ± 8 % ) were r and omized , 26 each to ablation and rate control . At 12 months , 88 % of ablation patients maintained sinus rhythm ( single-procedure success 68 % ) . Under rate control , rate criteria were achieved in 96 % . The primary endpoint , peak oxygen consumption , significantly increased in the ablation arm compared with rate control ( difference + 3.07 ml/kg/min , 95 % confidence interval : 0.56 to 5.59 , p = 0.018 ) . The change was not evident at 3 months ( + 0.79 ml/kg/min , 95 % confidence interval : -1.01 to 2.60 , p = 0.38 ) . Ablation improved Minnesota score ( p = 0.019 ) and B-type natriuretic peptide ( p = 0.045 ) and showed nonsignificant trends toward improved 6-min walk distance ( p = 0.095 ) and EF ( p = 0.055 ) . CONCLUSIONS This first r and omized trial of ablation versus rate control to focus on objective exercise performance in AF and HF shows significant benefit from ablation , a strategy that also improves symptoms and neurohormonal status . The effects develop over 12 months , consistent with progressive amelioration of the HF syndrome . ( A R and omised Trial to Assess Catheter Ablation Versus Rate Control in the Management of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation in Chronic Heart Failure ; NCT00878384 )
D. Restoration of sinus rhythm for monophasic vs. biphasic waveforms .
Another study showed that PVI result ed in long-term restoration
Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is a major public health problem in the United States .
More than 2.3 million Americans are estimated to have AF ( 1 ) .
The known association between AF and substantial mortality , morbidity , and health care costs compounds the effect of this condition .
Not only is the risk for death in patients with AF twice that of patients without it , but AF can result in myocardial ischemia and infa rct ion , exacerbate heart failure ( HF ) , and cause tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy if the ventricular rate is not well-controlled ( 25 ) .
The most dreaded complication of AF is thromboembolism , especially stroke ( 6 ) .
In some patients , AF or therapies to manage this condition can severely depreciate quality of life ( 710 ) .
Furthermore , the management of AF and its complications is responsible for nearly $ 16 billion in additional costs to the U.S. health care system per year ( 11 ) .
We conducted this systematic review to evaluate the comparative safety and effectiveness of rate- versus rhythm-control strategies ;  medications used for ventricular rate control ; strict versus more lenient rate-control strategies ; nonpharmacologic rate-control therapies  versus medications ; electrical cardioversion and antiarrhythmic medications  for restoration of sinus rhythm ;  and  catheter ablation , surgical ablation , and antiarrhythmic medications  for maintenance of sinus rhythm .