Conclusions Compared with high-dose statin therapy , ezetimibe with low-dose statin for more than 3 months may have a beneficial tendency of effects on glycemic control
Purpose Given the increased risk of incident diabetes and the side effects on glycemic control with statin treatment , statin and ezetimibe combination therapy has been widely used .
However , whether the same concern exists in ezetimibe remains uncertain .
This meta- analysis aim ed to investigate the influence of ezetimibe treatment on glycemic control .
Effect of Ezetimibe on LDL-C Lowering and Atherogenic Lipoprotein Profiles in Type 2 Diabetic Patients Poorly Controlled by Statins
Background There exists a sub population of T2DM in whom first-line doses of statin are insufficient for optimally reducing LDL-C , representing a major risk of CVD . The RESEARCH study focuses on LDL-C reduction in this population along with modifications of the lipid profiles leading to residual risks . Methods Lipid changes were assessed in a r and omized , multicenter , 12-week , open-label study comparing a high-potency statin ( 10 mg of atorvastatin or 1 mg of pitavastatin ) plus ezetimibe ( EAT : n = 53 ) with a double dose of statin ( 20 mg of atorvastatin or 2 mg of pitavastatin ) ( DST : n = 56 ) in DM subjects who had failed to achieve the optimal LDL-C targets .  Lipid variables were compared with a primary focus on LDL-C and with secondary focuses on the percentage of patients who reached the LDL-C targets and changes in the levels of RLP-C ( remnant like particle cholesterol ) and sd-LDL-C , two characteristic atherogenic risks of DM . Results The reduction of LDL-C ( % ) , the primary endpoint , differed significantly between the two groups ( -24.6 in EAT vs. -10.9 in DST ) . In the analyses of the secondary endpoints , EAT treatment brought about significantly larger reductions in sd-LDL-C ( -20.5 vs. -3.7 ) and RLP-C ( -19.7 vs. + 5.5 ) . In total , 89.4 % of the patients receiving EAT reached the optimized treatment goal compared to 51.0 % of the patients receiving DST . The changes in TC ( -16.3 vs. -6.3 ) and non-HDL-C ( -20.7 vs. -8.3 ) differed significantly between the two groups . Conclusion Ezetimibe added to high-potency statin ( 10 mg of atorvastatin or 1 mg of pitavastatin ) was more effective than the intensified-dose statin ( 20 mg of atorvastatin or 2 mg of pitavastatin ) treatment not only in helping T2DM patients attain more LDL-C reduction , but also in improving their atherogenic lipid profiles , including their levels of sd-LDL-C and RLP-C. We thus recommend the addition of ezetimibe to high-potency statin as a first line strategy for T2DM patients with insufficient statin response . Trial Registration The UMIN Clinical Trials Registry
Conclusions Compared with high-dose statin therapy , ezetimibe with low-dose statin for more than 3 months may have a beneficial tendency of effects on glycemic control
Purpose Given the increased risk of incident diabetes and the side effects on glycemic control with statin treatment , statin and ezetimibe combination therapy has been widely used .
However , whether the same concern exists in ezetimibe remains uncertain .
This meta- analysis aim ed to investigate the influence of ezetimibe treatment on glycemic control .