Results reveal no significant difference between the groups , with respect to BMI , while PA and DIET yielded a greater reduction in HbA1c .
Significant reduction in both systolic and diastolic pressures in the DIET group , and diastolic pressure in the PA group , was observed .
HDL-c in the DIET group was significantly higher than the control group , while no change in LDL-c levels , was seen in all three intervention subtypes .
There was no difference between the EDU vs. the control group in terms of HbA1c , blood pressure or HDL-c and LDL-c .
CONCLUSION DIET intervention showed an improvement in HbA1c , systolic/diastolic blood pressure and HDL-c , with an exception of LDL-c and BMI , suggesting that nutritional intervention had a significant impact on the quality of life by reducing the cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetes patients
BACKGROUND The current meta- analysis evaluated the outcomes of various lifestyle interventions , including diet modifications ( DIET ) , physical activity ( PA ) , and patient education ( EDU ) in reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes .
Prescription of physical activity is not sufficient to change sedentary behavior and improve glycemic control in type 2 diabetes patients.
OBJECTIVE To assess the impact of personalized exercise prescription on habitual physical activity and glycemic control in sedentary , insulin treated type 2 diabetes patients during a 2-y intervention period . RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS 74 patients were r and omized to the intervention ( n=38 ) or control ( n=36 ) group . The intervention group was stimulated to increase daily physical activity through regular , structured , and personalized exercise prescription by a physical therapist over the 2-y intervention period . RESULTS Physical activity levels at work or in leisure time were not modulated by the exercise prescription intervention . In accordance , no changes in body composition , glycemic control , medication use or risk factors for cardiovascular disease were observed . CONCLUSIONS Long-term behavioral intervention programs , providing individualized exercise prescription , are not sufficient to change sedentary behavior and /or improve glycemic control in insulin treated , type 2 diabetes patients
Results reveal no significant difference between the groups , with respect to BMI , while PA and DIET yielded a greater reduction in HbA1c .
Significant reduction in both systolic and diastolic pressures in the DIET group , and diastolic pressure in the PA group , was observed .
HDL-c in the DIET group was significantly higher than the control group , while no change in LDL-c levels , was seen in all three intervention subtypes .
There was no difference between the EDU vs. the control group in terms of HbA1c , blood pressure or HDL-c and LDL-c .
CONCLUSION DIET intervention showed an improvement in HbA1c , systolic/diastolic blood pressure and HDL-c , with an exception of LDL-c and BMI , suggesting that nutritional intervention had a significant impact on the quality of life by reducing the cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetes patients
BACKGROUND The current meta- analysis evaluated the outcomes of various lifestyle interventions , including diet modifications ( DIET ) , physical activity ( PA ) , and patient education ( EDU ) in reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes .