Antihypertensive drugs used in the treatment of adults ( primary prevention ) with mild hypertension ( systolic BP 140 - 159 mmHg and /or diastolic BP 90 - 99 mmHg ) have not been shown to reduce mortality or morbidity in RCTs .
More RCTs are needed in this prevalent population to know whether the benefits of treatment exceed the harms
BACKGROUND People with no previous cardiovascular events or cardiovascular disease represent a primary prevention population .
The benefits and harms of treating mild hypertension in primary prevention patients are not known at present .
This review examines the existing r and omised controlled trial ( RCT ) evidence .
OBJECTIVES PRIMARY OBJECTIVE To quantify the effects of antihypertensive drug therapy on mortality and morbidity in adults with mild hypertension ( systolic blood pressure ( BP ) 140 - 159 mmHg and /or diastolic BP 90 - 99 mmHg ) and without cardiovascular disease .
Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study (LIFE): a randomised trial against atenolol
BACKGROUND Blood pressure reduction achieved with beta-blockers and diuretics is the best recorded intervention to date for prevention of cardiovascular morbidity and death in patients with hypertension . Left ventricular hypertrophy ( LVH ) is a strong independent indicator of risk of cardiovascular morbidity and death . We aim ed to establish whether selective blocking of angiotensin II improves LVH beyond reducing blood pressure and , consequently , reduces cardiovascular morbidity and death . METHODS We did a double-masked , r and omised , parallel-group trial in 9193 participants aged 55 - 80 years with essential hypertension ( sitting blood pressure 160 - 200/95 - 115 mm Hg ) and LVH ascertained by electrocardiography ( ECG ) . We assigned participants once daily losartan-based or atenolol-based antihypertensive treatment for at least 4 years and until 1040 patients had a primary cardiovascular event ( death , myocardial infa rct ion , or stroke ) . We used Cox regression analysis to compare regimens . FINDINGS Blood pressure fell by 30.2/16.6 ( SD 18.5/10.1 ) and 29.1/16.8 mm Hg ( 19.2/10.1 ) in the losartan and atenolol groups , respectively . The primary composite endpoint occurred in 508 losartan ( 23.8 per 1000 patient-years ) and 588 atenolol patients ( 27.9 per 1000 patient-years ; relative risk 0.87 , 95 % CI 0.77 - 0.98 , p=0.021 ) . 204 losartan and 234 atenolol patients died from cardiovascular disease ( 0.89 , 0.73 - 1.07 , p=0.206 ) ; 232 and 309 , respectively , had fatal or non-fatal stroke ( 0.75 , 0.63 - 0.89 , p=0.001 ) ; and myocardial infa rct ion ( non-fatal and fatal ) occurred in 198 and 188 , respectively ( 1.07 , 0.88 - 1.31 , p=0.491 ) . New-onset diabetes was less frequent with losartan . Interpretation Losartan prevents more cardiovascular morbidity and death than atenolol for a similar reduction in blood pressure and is better tolerated . Losartan seems to confer benefits beyond reduction in blood pressure
Antihypertensive drugs used in the treatment of adults ( primary prevention ) with mild hypertension ( systolic BP 140 - 159 mmHg and /or diastolic BP 90 - 99 mmHg ) have not been shown to reduce mortality or morbidity in RCTs .
More RCTs are needed in this prevalent population to know whether the benefits of treatment exceed the harms
BACKGROUND People with no previous cardiovascular events or cardiovascular disease represent a primary prevention population .
The benefits and harms of treating mild hypertension in primary prevention patients are not known at present .
This review examines the existing r and omised controlled trial ( RCT ) evidence .
OBJECTIVES PRIMARY OBJECTIVE To quantify the effects of antihypertensive drug therapy on mortality and morbidity in adults with mild hypertension ( systolic blood pressure ( BP ) 140 - 159 mmHg and /or diastolic BP 90 - 99 mmHg ) and without cardiovascular disease .