More evidence was available for the measurement properties of the FAOS and the FAAM , but overall evidence supporting all measurement properties is not yet sufficient .
Purpose In the foot and ankle literature , a wide range of patient-reported outcome measures ( PROMs ) is used , however , consensus as to which PROMs are preferred is lacking .
Selection of a PROM is among other reasons , often based on measurement properties without considering the method ological quality of the studies that evaluate these measurement properties .
The aim of current study was first to identify the most frequently used foot and ankle-specific PROMs in recent orthopaedic foot and ankle literature , and second to conduct a systematic review to synthesize and critically appraise the measurement properties of these PROMS .
Reliability and validity of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score: a validation study from Iran
The aims of this study were to culturally adapt and vali date the Persian version of Foot and Ankle Outcome Score ( FAOS ) and present data on its psychometric properties for patients with different foot and ankle problems . The Persian version of FAOS was developed after a st and ard forward – backward translation and cultural adaptation process . The sample included 93 patients with foot and ankle disorders who were asked to complete two question naires : FAOS and Short-Form 36 Health Survey ( SF-36 ) . To determine test – retest reliability , 60 r and omly chosen patients completed the FAOS again 2 to 6 days after the first administration . Test – retest reliability and internal consistency were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient ( ICC ) and Cronbach ’s alpha , respectively . To evaluate convergent and divergent validity of FAOS compared to similar and dissimilar concepts of SF-36 , the Spearman ’s rank correlation was used . Dimensionality was determined by assessing item – subscale correlation corrected for overlap . The results of test – retest reliability show that all the FAOS subscales have a very high ICC , ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 . The minimum Cronbach ’s alpha level of 0.70 was exceeded by most subscales . The Spearman ’s correlation coefficient for convergent construct validity fell within 0.32 to 0.58 for the main hypotheses presented a priori between FAOS and SF-36 subscales . For dimensionality , the minimum Spearman ’s correlation coefficient of 0.40 was exceeded by most items . In conclusion , the results of our study show that the Persian version of FAOS seems to be suitable for Iranian patients with various foot and ankle problems especially lateral ankle sprain . Future studies are needed to establish stronger psychometric properties for patients with different foot and ankle problems
More evidence was available for the measurement properties of the FAOS and the FAAM , but overall evidence supporting all measurement properties is not yet sufficient .
Purpose In the foot and ankle literature , a wide range of patient-reported outcome measures ( PROMs ) is used , however , consensus as to which PROMs are preferred is lacking .
Selection of a PROM is among other reasons , often based on measurement properties without considering the method ological quality of the studies that evaluate these measurement properties .
The aim of current study was first to identify the most frequently used foot and ankle-specific PROMs in recent orthopaedic foot and ankle literature , and second to conduct a systematic review to synthesize and critically appraise the measurement properties of these PROMS .