By network meta- analysis , sildenafil seems to be the most efficiency with a slightly higher rate of treatment-emergent adverse events ( TEATs ) , whereas tadalafil had the lowest TEATs .
Compared with placebo , PDE5-Is manifested significantly improved treatment outcomes .
Overall , regular regimen demonstrated statistically pronounced better potency than on-dem and .
Phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors ( PDE5-Is ) have been recommended as first line therapy for erectile dysfunction for patients received nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer .
We examed the efficiency of PDE5-Is and considered the optimal application .
Safety and efficacy of vardenafil for the treatment of men with erectile dysfunction after radical retropubic prostatectomy.
PURPOSE More than one-third of men may experience erectile dysfunction ( ED ) after nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy . The efficacy and safety of vardenafil , a potent , selective , phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor , was assessed for the treatment of ED after radical prostatectomy . MATERIAL S AND METHODS In this double-blind study 440 men with ED after nerve sparing radical prostatectomy were r and omized to take placebo , or 10 or 20 mg vardenafil .  Efficacy was measured after 12 weeks using the erectile function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function , diary questions measuring vaginal penetration and intercourse success rates , and a global assessment question ( GAQ ) on erection . RESULTS Of the intent to treat population 70 % had severe ED ( erectile function less than 11 ) at baseline . After 12 weeks both vardenafil doses were significantly superior to placebo ( p < 0.0001 ) for all efficacy variables . Improved erections ( based on GAQ ) were reported by 65.2 % and 59.4 % of patients on 20 and 10 mg vardenafil , respectively , and by only 12.5 % of patients on placebo ( p < 0.0001 ) . Among men with bilateral neurovascular bundle sparing , positive GAQ responses were reported by 71.1 % and 59.7 % of patients on 20 and 10 mg vardenafil , respectively , versus 11.5 % of those on placebo ( p < 0.0001 ) . The average intercourse success rate per patient receiving 20 mg vardenafil was 74 % in men with mild to moderate ED and 28 % in men with severe ED , compared to 49 % and 4 % for placebo , respectively . Few adverse events were observed . They were generally mild to moderate headache , flushing and rhinitis . CONCLUSIONS In men with severe ED after nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy , vardenafil significantly improved key indices of erectile function
By network meta- analysis , sildenafil seems to be the most efficiency with a slightly higher rate of treatment-emergent adverse events ( TEATs ) , whereas tadalafil had the lowest TEATs .
Compared with placebo , PDE5-Is manifested significantly improved treatment outcomes .
Overall , regular regimen demonstrated statistically pronounced better potency than on-dem and .
Phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors ( PDE5-Is ) have been recommended as first line therapy for erectile dysfunction for patients received nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer .
We examed the efficiency of PDE5-Is and considered the optimal application .