The HBET group did not show improvement in MWD/T compared with the WA group ( SMD 0.30 , 95 % CI -0.45 to 1.05 ; P = 0.43 ; moderate- quality evidence ) .Compared with HBET , SET was more beneficial for PFWD/T but had no effect on quality of life parameters nor on self-reported functional impairment .
Compared with WA , SET was more beneficial for PFWD/T and self-reported functional impairment , as well as for some quality of life parameters ( e.g. , physical functioning , pain , and physical component summary after 12 months ) , and HBET had no effect .
Data show no obvious effects on mortality rates .
Evidence of moderate and high quality shows that SET provides an important benefit for treadmill-measured walking distance ( MWD and PFWD ) compared with HBET and WA , respectively .
Although its clinical relevance has not been definitively demonstrated , this benefit translates to increased MWD of 120 and 210 meters after three months in SET groups .
These increased walking distances are likely to have a positive impact on the lives of patients with IC .
Data provide no clear evidence of a difference between HBET and WA .
Trials show no clear differences in quality of life parameters nor in self-reported functional impairment between SET and HBET .
BACKGROUND Although supervised exercise therapy ( SET ) provides significant symptomatic benefit for patients with intermittent claudication ( IC ) , it remains an underutilized tool .
Widespread implementation of SET is restricted by lack of facilities and funding .
Structured home-based exercise therapy ( HBET ) with an observation component ( e.g. , exercise logbooks , pedometers ) and just walking advice ( WA ) are alternatives to SET .
This is the second up date of a review first published in 2006 .
OBJECTIVES The primary objective was to provide an accurate overview of studies evaluating effects of SET programs , HBET programs , and WA on maximal treadmill walking distance or time ( MWD/T ) for patients with IC .
Secondary objectives were to evaluate effects of SET , HBET , and WA on pain-free treadmill walking distance or time ( PFWD/T ) , quality of life , and self-reported functional impairment .
Superiority of treadmill walking exercise versus strength training for patients with peripheral arterial disease. Implications for the mechanism of the training response.
BACKGROUND In patients with intermittent claudication , a supervised walking exercise program increases peak exercise performance and community-based functional status .  Patients with peripheral arterial disease also have muscle weakness in the affected extremity that may contribute to the walking impairment . However , the potential benefits of training modalities other than walking exercise , such as strength training , have not been critically evaluated in this patient population . The present study tested the hypothesis that a strength training program would be as effective as treadmill walking exercise and that combinations of strengthening and walking exercise would be more effective than either alone in improving exercise performance . METHODS AND RESULTS Twenty-nine patients with disabling claudication were r and omized to 12 weeks of supervised walking exercise on a treadmill ( 3 h/wk at a work intensity sufficient to produce claudication ) , strength training ( 3 h/wk of resistive training of five muscle groups of each leg ) , or a nonexercising control group . Grade d treadmill testing was performed to maximally tolerated claudication pain to define changes in peak exercise performance . After 12 weeks , patients in the treadmill training program had a 74 + /- 58 % increase in peak walking time as well as improvements in peak oxygen consumption ( VO2 ) and the onset of claudication pain . Patients in the strength-trained group had a 36 + /- 48 % increase in peak walking time but no change in peak VO2 or claudication onset time . Control subjects had no changes in any of these measures over the 12-week period . After the first 12 weeks , patients in the initial walking exercise group continued for 12 more weeks of supervised treadmill training . This result ed in an additional 49 + /- 53 % increase in peak walking time ( total of 128 + /- 99 % increase over the 24 weeks ) . After the initial 12 weeks , patients in the strength-trained group began 12 weeks of supervised treadmill training , and patients in the control group participated in a 12-week combined program of strengthening and treadmill walking exercise . The combined strength and treadmill training program and treadmill training after 12 weeks of strength training result ed in increases in peak exercise performance similar to those observed with 12 weeks of treadmill training alone . CONCLUSIONS A supervised treadmill walking exercise program is an effective means to improve exercise performance in patients with intermittent claudication , with continued improvement over 24 weeks of training . In contrast , 12 weeks of strength training was less effective than 12 weeks of supervised treadmill walking exercise . Finally , strength training , whether sequential or concomitant , did not augment the response to a walking exercise program
The HBET group did not show improvement in MWD/T compared with the WA group ( SMD 0.30 , 95 % CI -0.45 to 1.05 ; P = 0.43 ; moderate- quality evidence ) .Compared with HBET , SET was more beneficial for PFWD/T but had no effect on quality of life parameters nor on self-reported functional impairment .
Compared with WA , SET was more beneficial for PFWD/T and self-reported functional impairment , as well as for some quality of life parameters ( e.g. , physical functioning , pain , and physical component summary after 12 months ) , and HBET had no effect .
Data show no obvious effects on mortality rates .
Evidence of moderate and high quality shows that SET provides an important benefit for treadmill-measured walking distance ( MWD and PFWD ) compared with HBET and WA , respectively .
Although its clinical relevance has not been definitively demonstrated , this benefit translates to increased MWD of 120 and 210 meters after three months in SET groups .
These increased walking distances are likely to have a positive impact on the lives of patients with IC .
Data provide no clear evidence of a difference between HBET and WA .
Trials show no clear differences in quality of life parameters nor in self-reported functional impairment between SET and HBET .
BACKGROUND Although supervised exercise therapy ( SET ) provides significant symptomatic benefit for patients with intermittent claudication ( IC ) , it remains an underutilized tool .
Widespread implementation of SET is restricted by lack of facilities and funding .
Structured home-based exercise therapy ( HBET ) with an observation component ( e.g. , exercise logbooks , pedometers ) and just walking advice ( WA ) are alternatives to SET .
This is the second up date of a review first published in 2006 .
OBJECTIVES The primary objective was to provide an accurate overview of studies evaluating effects of SET programs , HBET programs , and WA on maximal treadmill walking distance or time ( MWD/T ) for patients with IC .
Secondary objectives were to evaluate effects of SET , HBET , and WA on pain-free treadmill walking distance or time ( PFWD/T ) , quality of life , and self-reported functional impairment .