Conclusions This meta‐ analysis provides level 1 evidence that vitamin D supplementation may reduce chronic low‐ grade inflammation in patients with type 2 diabetes .
Background Vitamin D has been proposed to have anti‐inflammatory properties ; however , the effect of vitamin D supplementation on inflammation in type 2 diabetes has not been established .
Objective The aim of this systematic review and meta‐ analysis was to examine the effect of vitamin D supplementation on inflammatory markers in patients with type 2 diabetes and to identify relevant gaps in knowledge .
The effect of high-dose vitamin D supplementation on insulin resistance and arterial stiffness in patients with type 2 diabetes
Background / Aims Recent epidemiological studies revealed a striking inverse relationship between vitamin D levels , glucose intolerance/insulin resistance ( IR ) , and cardiovascular disease . However , few interventional studies have evaluated the effect of vitamin D supplementation on cardiovascular risk , such as IR and arterial stiffness , in diabetes . We investigated the role of vitamin D supplementation on cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetes patients , including metabolic parameters , IR , and arterial stiffness . Methods We enrolled patients who were taking antidiabetic medications or managed their diabetes using lifestyle changes . We excluded patients who were taking vitamin D or calcium supplements .  We r and omized participants into the vitamin D group ( cholecalciferol 2,000 IU/day + calcium 200 mg/day , n = 40 ) or the placebo group ( calcium 200 mg/day , n = 41 ) . We compared their IR ( homeostasis model of assessment [HOMA]-IR ) and arterial stiffness ( brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity and radial augmentation index ) before and after 24 weeks of intervention . Results The baseline characteristics of the two groups were similar . A total of 62 participants ( placebo , 30 ; vitamin D , 32 ) completed the study protocol . At the end of the study period , the 25-hydroxyvitamin D [ 25(OH)D ] levels were significantly higher in the vitamin D group than in the placebo group ( 35.4 ± 8.5 ng/mL vs. 18.4 ± 7.3 ng/mL , p < 0.001 ) . There was no difference in HOMA-IR or changes in arterial stiffness  ( placebo , 21 , vitamin D , 24 ) between the groups . Conclusions Our data suggest that high-dose vitamin D supplementation might be effective in terms of elevating 25(OH)D levels . However , we identified no beneficial effects on cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetes , including IR and arterial stiffness
Conclusions This meta‐ analysis provides level 1 evidence that vitamin D supplementation may reduce chronic low‐ grade inflammation in patients with type 2 diabetes .
Background Vitamin D has been proposed to have anti‐inflammatory properties ; however , the effect of vitamin D supplementation on inflammation in type 2 diabetes has not been established .
Objective The aim of this systematic review and meta‐ analysis was to examine the effect of vitamin D supplementation on inflammatory markers in patients with type 2 diabetes and to identify relevant gaps in knowledge .