The effect on patient outcomes remained less clear as these were rarely assessed .
Arrangements for follow-up ( organisational intervention ) also showed a favourable effect on process outcomes .
Multiple interventions in which patient education was added or in which the role of the nurse was enhanced also reported favourable effects on patients ' health outcomes .
REVIEW ER 'S CONCLUSIONS Multifaceted professional interventions can enhance the performance of health professionals in managing patients with diabetes .
Organisational interventions that improve regular prompted recall and review of patients ( central computerised tracking systems or nurses who regularly contact the patient ) can also improve diabetes management .
The addition of patient-oriented interventions can lead to improved patient health outcomes .
BACKGROUND Diabetes is a common chronic disease that is increasingly managed in primary care .
Different systems have been proposed to manage diabetes care .
Integrated care for diabetes: clinical, psychosocial, and economic evaluation
Abstract Objectives : To evaluate integrated care for diabetes in clinical , psychosocial , and economic terms . Design : Pragmatic r and omised trial . Setting : Hospital diabetic clinic and three general practice groups in Grampian . Patients : 274 adult diabetic patients attending a hospital clinic and registered with one of three general practice s. Intervention - R and om allocation to conventional hospital clinic care or integrated care . Integrated care patients seen in general practice every three or four months and in the hospital clinic annually . General practitioners were given written guidelines for integrated care . Main outcome measures : Metabolic control , psychosocial status , knowledge of diabetes , beliefs about control of diabetes , satisfaction with treatment , disruption of normal activities , numbers of consultations and admissions , frequency of metabolic monitoring , costs to patients and NHS . Results - A higher proportion of patients defaulted from conventional care ( 14 ( 10 % ) ) than from integrated care ( 4 ( 3 % ) , 95 % confidence interval of difference 2 % to 13 % ) . After two years no significant differences were found between the groups in metabolic control , psychosocial status , knowledge , beliefs about control , satisfaction with treatment , unscheduled admissions , or disruption of normal activities .  Integrated care was as effective for insulin dependent as non-insulin dependent patients . Patients in integrated care had more visits and higher frequencies of examination . Costs to patients were lower in integrated care ( mean pounds sterling 1.70 ) than in conventional care ( pounds sterling 8) . 88 % of patients who experienced integrated care wished to continue with it . Conclusions : This model of integrated care for diabetes was at least as effective as conventional hospital clinic care
The effect on patient outcomes remained less clear as these were rarely assessed .
Arrangements for follow-up ( organisational intervention ) also showed a favourable effect on process outcomes .
Multiple interventions in which patient education was added or in which the role of the nurse was enhanced also reported favourable effects on patients ' health outcomes .
REVIEW ER 'S CONCLUSIONS Multifaceted professional interventions can enhance the performance of health professionals in managing patients with diabetes .
Organisational interventions that improve regular prompted recall and review of patients ( central computerised tracking systems or nurses who regularly contact the patient ) can also improve diabetes management .
The addition of patient-oriented interventions can lead to improved patient health outcomes .
BACKGROUND Diabetes is a common chronic disease that is increasingly managed in primary care .
Different systems have been proposed to manage diabetes care .