RESULTS The meta- analysis did not reveal any effect of the type of acetabular component fixation on either survivorship or revision rate .
The preference for cementless acetabular components on the basis of improved survivorship is not supported by the published evidence .
Although concerns regarding aseptic loosening of cemented acetabular components may have led North American surgeons toward the nearly exclusive use of cementless acetabular components , the available literature suggests that the fixation of cemented acetabular components is more reliable than that of cementless components beyond the first postoperative decade
BACKGROUND The use of cementless acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty has gained popularity over the past decade .
Most total hip arthroplasties being performed in North America currently use cementless acetabular components .
The objective of this systematic review and meta- analysis was to compare the survivorship and revision rate of cemented and cementless acetabular components utilized in total hip arthroplasty .
A comparison of polyethylene wear rates between cemented and cementless cups. A prospective, randomised trial.
We selected r and omly a consecutive series of 162 patients requiring hip replacement to receive either a cementless , hemispherical , modular , titanium acetabular cup or a cemented , all-polyethylene cup . These replacements were performed by two surgeons in four general hospitals . The same surgical technique was used and a 26 mm metal-head femoral component was used in every case . After exclusions , 115 hips were studied for differences in rates of wear and osteolysis . The mean clinical follow-up was eight years and the mean radiological follow-up , 6.5 years . The cementless cups  wore at a mean rate of 0.15 mm per year and the cemented cups at 0.07 mm per year . This difference was significant ( p < 0.0001 ) . Our findings in this mid-term study suggest that cementless cups  wear more than cemented cups
RESULTS The meta- analysis did not reveal any effect of the type of acetabular component fixation on either survivorship or revision rate .
The preference for cementless acetabular components on the basis of improved survivorship is not supported by the published evidence .
Although concerns regarding aseptic loosening of cemented acetabular components may have led North American surgeons toward the nearly exclusive use of cementless acetabular components , the available literature suggests that the fixation of cemented acetabular components is more reliable than that of cementless components beyond the first postoperative decade
BACKGROUND The use of cementless acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty has gained popularity over the past decade .
Most total hip arthroplasties being performed in North America currently use cementless acetabular components .
The objective of this systematic review and meta- analysis was to compare the survivorship and revision rate of cemented and cementless acetabular components utilized in total hip arthroplasty .