EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS The most studied combination therapy for the treatment of male LUTS is the α1-adrenoceptor antagonist/5α-reductase inhibitor combination .
This combination seems to be more efficacious in terms of several outcome variables , in particular in men who have moderate-to-severe LUTS and are at risk of disease progression .
Also in terms of nocturia improvements , this combination is significantly more effective than the monotherapy .
The other often studied combination treatment , in both male and female patients with LUTS , was the combination of antimuscarinics ( in particular solifenacin ) and mirabegron .
This combination seems to be more effective in comparison with the monotherapies with respect to urinary incontinence and urgency urinary incontinence episodes and several other objective and subjective parameters , without relevant increase of adverse events .
The combination of hormone therapy and antimuscarinics in women with LUTS does not seem to be useful .
For the treatment of LUTS in men and women , combination therapy appears to be a promising option to optimize the efficacy of the available drugs for those who do not experience sufficient benefit with monotherapy .
This add-on scenario offers the possibility to have a more tailored approach to the management of LUTS , always seeking the optimal balance between efficacy and tolerability for a given patient .
PATIENT SUMMARY Some combination of drugs may offer advantages over monotherapies for the treatment of voiding and storage complaints in men and women
CONTEXT Several drugs are approved and available for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms ( LUTS ) in men and women .
However , the vast majority of available data , upon which the approval and recommendation in guidelines are based , considered only the role of the monotherapies and did not evaluate possible combination therapies .
OBJECTIVE This systematic review analyzes the efficacy and adverse events of combination therapies for male and female LUTS .
Population-based survey of urinary incontinence, overactive bladder, and other lower urinary tract symptoms in five countries: results of the EPIC study.
OBJECTIVE Estimate the prevalence of urinary incontinence ( UI ) , overactive bladder ( OAB ) , and other lower urinary tract symptoms ( LUTS ) among men and women in five countries using the 2002 International Continence Society ( ICS ) definitions . METHODS This population -based , cross-sectional survey was conducted between April and December 2005 in Canada , Germany , Italy , Sweden , and the United Kingdom using computer-assisted telephone interviews .  A r and om sample of men and women aged > /= 18 yr residing in the five countries and who were representative of the general population s in these countries was selected . Using 2002 ICS definitions , the prevalence estimates of storage , voiding , and postmicturition LUTS were calculated . Data were stratified by country , age cohort , and gender . RESULTS A total of 19,165 individuals agreed to participate ; 64.3 % reported at least one LUTS . Nocturia was the most prevalent LUTS ( men , 48.6 % ; women , 54.5 % ) . The prevalence of storage LUTS ( men , 51.3 % ; women , 59.2 % ) was greater than that for voiding ( men , 25.7 % ; women , 19.5 % ) and postmicturition ( men , 16.9 % ; women , 14.2 % ) symptoms combined . The overall prevalence of OAB was 11.8 % ; rates were similar in men and women and increased with age . OAB was more prevalent than all types of UI combined ( 9.4 % ) . CONCLUSIONS The EPIC study is the largest population -based survey to assess prevalence rates of OAB , UI , and other LUTS in five countries . To date , this is the first study to evaluate these symptoms simultaneously using the 2002 ICS definitions . The results indicate that these symptoms are highly prevalent in the countries surveyed
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS The most studied combination therapy for the treatment of male LUTS is the α1-adrenoceptor antagonist/5α-reductase inhibitor combination .
This combination seems to be more efficacious in terms of several outcome variables , in particular in men who have moderate-to-severe LUTS and are at risk of disease progression .
Also in terms of nocturia improvements , this combination is significantly more effective than the monotherapy .
The other often studied combination treatment , in both male and female patients with LUTS , was the combination of antimuscarinics ( in particular solifenacin ) and mirabegron .
This combination seems to be more effective in comparison with the monotherapies with respect to urinary incontinence and urgency urinary incontinence episodes and several other objective and subjective parameters , without relevant increase of adverse events .
The combination of hormone therapy and antimuscarinics in women with LUTS does not seem to be useful .
For the treatment of LUTS in men and women , combination therapy appears to be a promising option to optimize the efficacy of the available drugs for those who do not experience sufficient benefit with monotherapy .
This add-on scenario offers the possibility to have a more tailored approach to the management of LUTS , always seeking the optimal balance between efficacy and tolerability for a given patient .
PATIENT SUMMARY Some combination of drugs may offer advantages over monotherapies for the treatment of voiding and storage complaints in men and women
CONTEXT Several drugs are approved and available for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms ( LUTS ) in men and women .
However , the vast majority of available data , upon which the approval and recommendation in guidelines are based , considered only the role of the monotherapies and did not evaluate possible combination therapies .
OBJECTIVE This systematic review analyzes the efficacy and adverse events of combination therapies for male and female LUTS .