Complex professional interventions improved the process of care , but the effect on patient outcomes remained less clear because such outcomes were rarely assessed .
Organizational interventions that facilitated the structured and regular review of patients also showed a favorable effect on process measures .
Complex interventions in which patient education was added and /or the role of a nurse was enhanced led to improvements in patient outcomes as well as the process of care .
CONCLUSIONS Multifaceted professional interventions and organizational interventions that facilitate structured and regular review of patients were effective in improving the process of care .
The addition of patient education to these interventions and the enhancement of the role of nurses in diabetes care led to improvements in patient outcomes and the process of care
Reducing lower-extremity amputations due to diabetes. Application of the staged diabetes management approach in a primary care setting.
BACKGROUND While lower-extremity amputation ( LEA ) is a frequent complication of diabetes , effective strategies for the prevention of LEA in primary care setting s have not been extensively studied . METHODS This prospect i ve study of American Indians with diabetes in a rural primary care clinic was divided into three periods : the st and ard care period ( 1986 to 1989 ) , during which patients received foot care at the discretion of the primary care provider ; the public health period ( 1990 to 1993 ) , during which patients  were screened for foot problems and high-risk individuals received foot care education and protective footwear ; and the Staged Diabetes Management ( SDM ) period ( 1994 to 1996 ) , during which comprehensive guidelines for diabetic foot management were adapted by the primary care clinicians to their practice s and were systematic ally implemented . RESULTS A total of 639 individuals contributed 4322 diabetic person-years during the three periods of observation . Patient sex distribution , mean age , and mean duration of diabetes were similar i the three periods . The average annual LEA incidence was 29/1000 diabetic person-years for the st and ard care period ( n = 42 ) , 21/1000 for the public health period ( n = 33 ) , and 15/1000 for the SDM period ( n = 20 ) , an overall 48 % reduction ( P = .016 ) . Overall , the incidence of a first amputation declined from 21/1000 to 6/1000 ( P < .0001 ) . CONCLUSIONS The customization and systematic implementation of practice guidelines by local primary care providers was associated with improved diabetic foot care outcomes . SDM has relevance to primary care organizations seeking to improve outcomes for patients with diabetes
Complex professional interventions improved the process of care , but the effect on patient outcomes remained less clear because such outcomes were rarely assessed .
Organizational interventions that facilitated the structured and regular review of patients also showed a favorable effect on process measures .
Complex interventions in which patient education was added and /or the role of a nurse was enhanced led to improvements in patient outcomes as well as the process of care .
CONCLUSIONS Multifaceted professional interventions and organizational interventions that facilitate structured and regular review of patients were effective in improving the process of care .
The addition of patient education to these interventions and the enhancement of the role of nurses in diabetes care led to improvements in patient outcomes and the process of care