TSA indicated lack of firm evidence for the results of the meta‐analytic outcomes on clinical and radiographic success .
Conclusion BD and MTA have similar clinical and radiographic success rates based on limited and low‐ quality evidence .
Objectives Pulpotomy is the favored treatment for pulp exposure in carious primary teeth .
This review aim ed to compare the success rates of biodentine ( BD ) and mineral trioxide aggregate ( MTA ) pulpotomies  in primary molars using meta‐ analysis ( MA ) and trial sequential analysis ( TSA ) and also to assess the quality of the results by Grading of Recommendations , Assessment , Development and Evaluation ( GRADE ) .
Clinical and radiographic comparison of biodentine, mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol as pulpotomy agents in primary molars
Aim To compare the clinical and radiographic success rates of three different pulpotomy agents in primary molars after 18 months . Methods The study was carried out with 51 primary molars of children aged 5–9 years old . The teeth were r and omly assigned to the experimental or control groups . After coronal pulp removal and haemostasis , the remaining pulp tissue was covered with Biodentine ® or mineral trioxide aggregate in the experimental groups . In the control group , formocresol was placed with a cotton pellet over the pulp tissue for 5 min and after removal the pulp tissue was covered with zinc oxide – eugenol ( ZOE ) paste . All teeth were immediately restored with reinforced ZOE base and resin modified glass-ionomer cement , and later with pre-formed metal crowns . Follow-up assessment s were carried out after 3 , 6 , 12 and 18 months . Results Forty-five teeth were available for follow up at the end of 18 months . All of the available teeth for mineral trioxide aggregate and Biodentine ® were clinical ly successful , as were 73.3 % of the FC group . Radiographic success rate for the formocresol group at 18 months follow up was 73.3 , 100 % for mineral trioxide aggregate and 86.6 % for Biodentine ® group . Conclusion Mineral Trioxide aggregate and Biodentine ® showed more favourable results than formocresol
TSA indicated lack of firm evidence for the results of the meta‐analytic outcomes on clinical and radiographic success .
Conclusion BD and MTA have similar clinical and radiographic success rates based on limited and low‐ quality evidence .
Objectives Pulpotomy is the favored treatment for pulp exposure in carious primary teeth .
This review aim ed to compare the success rates of biodentine ( BD ) and mineral trioxide aggregate ( MTA ) pulpotomies  in primary molars using meta‐ analysis ( MA ) and trial sequential analysis ( TSA ) and also to assess the quality of the results by Grading of Recommendations , Assessment , Development and Evaluation ( GRADE ) .