SET was still beneficial for maximal and pain-free walking distances at 12 months , but it did not have a significant effect on quality of life parameters .
AUTHORS ' CONCLUSIONS SET has statistically significant benefit on treadmill walking distance ( maximal and pain-free ) compared with non-supervised regimens .
BACKGROUND Although supervised exercise therapy is considered to be of significant benefit for people with leg pain ( peripheral arterial disease ( PAD ) ) , implementing supervised exercise programs ( SETs ) in daily practice has limitations .
This is an up date of a review first published in 2006 .
OBJECTIVES The main objective of this review was to provide an accurate overview of studies evaluating the effects of supervised versus non-supervised exercise therapy on maximal walking time or distance on a treadmill for people with intermittent claudication .
Efficacy of arm-ergometry versus treadmill exercise training to improve walking distance in patients with claudication
Abstract The efficacy of treadmill walking training to improve pain-free ( PFWD ) and maximal ( MWD ) walking distance in patients with claudication is well documented . The effects of aerobic arm-ergometry to improve PFWD and MWD compared to treadmill walking or usual care are not known . Forty-one participants ( 29 male , 12 female , mean age 67.7 years , 92.7 % smoking history , 36.6 % with diabetes ) with lifestyle-limiting claudication were r and omized to 12 weeks of 3 hours/week of supervised exercise training using either arm-ergometry , treadmill walking , or a combination , versus control .  PFWD and MWD were assessed before and after training , and after 12 weeks of follow-up . The 12-week MWD increased significantly in the arm-ergometry ( + 53 % ) , treadmill ( + 69 % ) , and combination ( + 68 % ) groups ( p < 0.002 versus control ) . The 24-week MWD was maintained in the arm-ergometry ( p = 0.009 ) and treadmill ( p = 0.019 ) groups , whereas the combination group declined ( p = 0.751 ) versus control . The 12-week PFWD increased significantly in the arm-ergometry group ( + 82 % ; p = 0.025 versus control ) . Change in PFWD in treadmill ( + 54 % ; p = 0.196 versus control ) and combination ( + 60 % ; p = 0.107 versus control ) groups did not reach statistical significance . PFWD improvement was maintained in the arm-ergometry group after a 12-week follow-up ( + 123 % ; p = 0.011 versus control ) . In conclusion , these pilot data demonstrate for the first time that dynamic arm exercise training can improve walking capability in people with peripheral arterial disease (PAD)-induced claudication compared to participants receiving usual care and that improvement was not different from that seen with treadmill walking exercise training . Dynamic arm exercise may be a therapeutic exercise option for patients with PAD
SET was still beneficial for maximal and pain-free walking distances at 12 months , but it did not have a significant effect on quality of life parameters .
AUTHORS ' CONCLUSIONS SET has statistically significant benefit on treadmill walking distance ( maximal and pain-free ) compared with non-supervised regimens .
BACKGROUND Although supervised exercise therapy is considered to be of significant benefit for people with leg pain ( peripheral arterial disease ( PAD ) ) , implementing supervised exercise programs ( SETs ) in daily practice has limitations .
This is an up date of a review first published in 2006 .
OBJECTIVES The main objective of this review was to provide an accurate overview of studies evaluating the effects of supervised versus non-supervised exercise therapy on maximal walking time or distance on a treadmill for people with intermittent claudication .