Active surveillance represents a viable option in men with low-risk PCa and a long life expectancy .
PSA doubling time in < 3 yr or a biopsy progression indicates the need for active intervention .
In men with locally advanced PCa in whom local therapy is not m and atory , watchful waiting ( WW ) is a treatment alternative to and rogen-deprivation therapy ( ADT ) with equivalent oncologic efficacy .
Active treatment is mostly recommended for patients with localised disease and a long life expectancy  with  radical prostatectomy ( RP ) shown to be superior to WW in a prospect i ve r and omised trial .
Nerve-sparing RP represents the approach of choice in organ-confined disease ; neoadjuvant and rogen deprivation demonstrates no improvement of outcome variables .
For locally advanced disease , adjuvant ADT for 3 yr results in superior disease-specific and overall survival rates and represents the treatment of choice .
OBJECTIVE Our aim was to present a summary of the 2010 version of the European Association of Urology ( EAU ) guidelines on the screening , diagnosis , and treatment of clinical ly localised cancer of the prostate ( PCa ) .
Current evidence is insufficient to warrant widespread population -based screening by prostate-specific antigen ( PSA ) for PCa .
A systematic prostate biopsy under ultrasound guidance and local anaesthesia is the preferred diagnostic method .
Immediate versus deferred androgen deprivation treatment in patients with node-positive prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy.
BACKGROUND Appropriate timing of and rogen deprivation treatment ( ADT ) for prostate cancer is controversial . Our aim was to determine whether immediate ADT extends survival in men with node-positive prostate cancer who have undergone radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy compared with those who received ADT only once disease progressed . METHODS Eligible patients from 36 institutes in the USA were r and omly assigned in 1988 - 93 to receive immediate ADT ( n=47 ) or to be observed ( n=51 ) , with ADT to be given on detection of distant metastases or symptomatic recurrences . Patients were followed up every 3 months for the first year and every 6 months thereafter . The primary endpoint was progression-free survival ; secondary endpoints were overall and disease-specific survival . Analysis was by intention to treat . To ensure that the treatment groups were comparable , we did a retrospective central pathology review of slides and re grade d the Gleason scores for available sample s. This trial pre date s the requirement for clinical trial registration . FINDINGS At median follow-up of 11.9 years ( range 9.7 - 14.5 for surviving patients ) , men assigned immediate ADT had a significant improvement in overall survival ( hazard ratio 1.84 [ 95 % CI 1.01 - 3.35 ] , p=0.04 ) , prostate-cancer-specific survival ( 4.09 [ 1.76 - 9.49 ] , p=0.0004 ) , and progression-free survival ( 3.42 [ 1.96 - 5.98 ] , p<0.0001 ) . Of 49 histopathology slides received ( 19 immediate ADT , 30 observation ) , 16 were down grade d from the original Gleason score ( between groups < or = 6 , 7 , and > or = 8) and five were up grade d. We recorded similar proportions of score changes in each group ( p=0.68 ) , and no difference in score distribution by treatment ( p=0.38 ) . After adjustment for score , associations were still significant between treatment and survival ( overall , p=0.02 ; disease-specific , p=0.002 ; progression-free survival , p<0.0001 ) . INTERPRETATION Early ADT benefits patients with nodal metastases who have undergone prostatectomy and lymphadenectomy , compared with those who receive deferred treatment . The beneficial effects of early ADT , rather than an imbalance in risk factors , are likely to explain the differences in outcomes between treatments
Active surveillance represents a viable option in men with low-risk PCa and a long life expectancy .
PSA doubling time in < 3 yr or a biopsy progression indicates the need for active intervention .
In men with locally advanced PCa in whom local therapy is not m and atory , watchful waiting ( WW ) is a treatment alternative to and rogen-deprivation therapy ( ADT ) with equivalent oncologic efficacy .
Active treatment is mostly recommended for patients with localised disease and a long life expectancy  with  radical prostatectomy ( RP ) shown to be superior to WW in a prospect i ve r and omised trial .
Nerve-sparing RP represents the approach of choice in organ-confined disease ; neoadjuvant and rogen deprivation demonstrates no improvement of outcome variables .
For locally advanced disease , adjuvant ADT for 3 yr results in superior disease-specific and overall survival rates and represents the treatment of choice .
OBJECTIVE Our aim was to present a summary of the 2010 version of the European Association of Urology ( EAU ) guidelines on the screening , diagnosis , and treatment of clinical ly localised cancer of the prostate ( PCa ) .
Current evidence is insufficient to warrant widespread population -based screening by prostate-specific antigen ( PSA ) for PCa .
A systematic prostate biopsy under ultrasound guidance and local anaesthesia is the preferred diagnostic method .