RECENT FINDINGS Several r and omized control trials and systematic review s demonstrate the safety and efficacy of atrial fibrillation ablation in patients with heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction .
In multiple trials , these patients have shown clinical benefit from atrial fibrillation ablation including improved left ventricular systolic function , quality of life , and clinical heart failure symptoms .
SUMMARY Atrial fibrillation ablation in heart failure patients remains well tolerated with an overall efficacy comparable to atrial fibrillation ablation in patients without heart failure .
There is consistent evidence for the clinical benefit of atrial fibrillation ablation in heart failure patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction and limited evidence for atrial fibrillation ablation in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction .
Currently , there is insufficient data regarding the safety and efficacy of left atrial appendage closure devices in heart failure patients
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure experience an increased morbidity and mortality from the hemodynamic consequences of atrial fibrillation and an increased stroke risk .
Consequently , there has been increased attention to procedural alternatives to pharmacologic rhythm control and anticoagulation for stroke prevention .
This review aims to evaluate the evidence for atrial fibrillation ablation and left atrial appendage closure in heart failure patients .
Efficacy, safety, and outcomes of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.
OBJECTIVES This study sought to investigate the efficacy and safety of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation ( AF ) in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction ( HFPEF ) . BACKGROUND AF is a precipitating factor for clinical deterioration of HFPEF . METHODS Catheter ablation for AF was performed in a consecutive 74 patients with compensated HFPEF ( left ventricular [ LV ] ejection fraction > 50 % ) . AF-free probability after catheter ablation and factors relating to maintenance of sinus rhythm were investigated . LV strain and strain rate were assessed by echocardiography at baseline and over 12 months after ablation . RESULTS During a 34 ± 16-month follow-up period , single- and multiple-procedure drug-free success rates were 27 % ( n = 20 ) and 45 % ( n = 33 ) , respectively . Multiple procedures and pharmaceutically assisted success rate was 73 % ( n = 54 ) . No major complications occurred during follow-up . Multivariate Cox regression analyses revealed that AF type ( other than long-st and ing persistent AF ) and lack of hypertension were independently associated with maintenance of sinus rhythm ( hazard ratio [ HR ] : 1.81 , 95 % confidence interval [ CI ] : 1.03 to 3.17 , p = 0.04 ; HR : 0.49 , 95 % CI : 0.24 to 0.96 , p = 0.04 , respectively ) . LV systolic indices ( LV ejection fraction , LV strain/strain rate at systole ) and diastolic indices ( E/E ' , ratio of LV strain rate at diastole with early transmitral flow ) were improved only in patients maintaining sinus rhythm at follow-up . CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that AF can be effectively and safely treated with a composite of repeat procedures and pharmaceuticals in patients with HFPEF . However , the current study was a single-arm analysis ; therefore , larger r and omized control studies are needed to verify the benefit of AF ablation in this cohort
RECENT FINDINGS Several r and omized control trials and systematic review s demonstrate the safety and efficacy of atrial fibrillation ablation in patients with heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction .
In multiple trials , these patients have shown clinical benefit from atrial fibrillation ablation including improved left ventricular systolic function , quality of life , and clinical heart failure symptoms .
SUMMARY Atrial fibrillation ablation in heart failure patients remains well tolerated with an overall efficacy comparable to atrial fibrillation ablation in patients without heart failure .
There is consistent evidence for the clinical benefit of atrial fibrillation ablation in heart failure patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction and limited evidence for atrial fibrillation ablation in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction .
Currently , there is insufficient data regarding the safety and efficacy of left atrial appendage closure devices in heart failure patients
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure experience an increased morbidity and mortality from the hemodynamic consequences of atrial fibrillation and an increased stroke risk .
Consequently , there has been increased attention to procedural alternatives to pharmacologic rhythm control and anticoagulation for stroke prevention .
This review aims to evaluate the evidence for atrial fibrillation ablation and left atrial appendage closure in heart failure patients .