Our review provides anchor-based MID estimates , as well as a rating of their credibility , for PROMs for patients with shoulder conditions .
The MID estimates inform the interpretation for a linked systematic review and guideline addressing subacromial decompression surgery for shoulder pain , and could also prove useful for authors addressing other interventions for shoulder problems .
OBJECTIVES To identify credible anchor-based minimal important differences ( MIDs ) for  patient-reported outcome measures  ( PROMs ) relevant to a BMJ Rapid Recommendations addressing subacromial decompression surgery for shoulder pain .
Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference.
In recent years quality of life instruments have been featured as primary outcomes in many r and omized trials . One of the challenges facing the investigator using such measures is determining the significance of any differences observed , and communicating that significance to clinicians who will be applying the trial results . We have developed an approach to elucidating the significance of changes in score in quality of life instruments by comparing them to global ratings of change . Using this approach we have established a plausible range within which the minimal clinical ly important difference ( MCID ) falls . In three studies in which instruments measuring  dyspnea , fatigue , and emotional function in patients with chronic heart and lung disease were applied the MCID was represented by mean change in score of approximately 0.5 per item , when responses were presented on a seven point Likert scale . Furthermore , we have established ranges for changes in question naire scores that correspond to moderate and large changes in the domains of interest . This information will be useful in interpreting question naire scores , both in individuals and in groups of patients participating in controlled trials , and in the planning of new trials
Our review provides anchor-based MID estimates , as well as a rating of their credibility , for PROMs for patients with shoulder conditions .
The MID estimates inform the interpretation for a linked systematic review and guideline addressing subacromial decompression surgery for shoulder pain , and could also prove useful for authors addressing other interventions for shoulder problems .
OBJECTIVES To identify credible anchor-based minimal important differences ( MIDs ) for  patient-reported outcome measures  ( PROMs ) relevant to a BMJ Rapid Recommendations addressing subacromial decompression surgery for shoulder pain .