The  Childhood Health Assessment Question naire ( C-HAQ )  was the most extensively studied instrument and had high reliability , but only moderate correlations with other indices of disease activity and poor responsiveness to change in disease status .
The physician global assessment of disease activity ( PGA ) and articular indices had the strongest association with disease activity and were the most responsive to change .
Measures of psychosocial function and quality of life were moderately associated with measures of disease activity , but were less responsive to changes in disease status .
In children with JIA , no single instrument was superior in reliability or validity or in describing the impact of JIA .
Although the C-HAQ has been extensively evaluated , the PGA and articular indices appear to have the highest responsiveness to change and , therefore , the highest potential for detecting important differences in treatment response
OBJECTIVE To review the performance characteristics of the instruments most commonly used to measure clinical outcomes in juvenile idiopathic arthritis ( JIA ) , including global assessment s , articular indices , functional/disability assessment s , and quality of life measures .
METHODS As part of an Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality comparative effectiveness review of antirheumatic drugs , we explored the characteristics of commonly used outcome measures for JIA .
Comparisons of Five Health Status Instruments for Orthopedic Evaluation
This study represents a long-term effort to find optimal techniques for evaluating outcome in patients who have undergone total joint arthroplasty . Sensitivity of five health status question naires was studied in a longitudinal evaluation of orthopedic surgery . The question naires ( Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales [ AIMS ] , Functional Status Index [ FSI ] ,  Health  Assessment  Question naire [ HAQ ] , Index of  Well  Being [ IWB ] , and Sickness Impact Profile  [ SIP ] ) were administered to 38 patients with end-stage arthritis at three points in time : two weeks before hip or knee arthroplasty , and at three-month and 12- to 15-month follow-up . Response values ( i.e. , changes within patients ) were calculated on four scales : global health , pain , mobility , and social function . By the three-month follow-up , most instruments detected large mean responses in global health , pain scores , and mobility . Smaller changes on these scales were found between three and 12 to 15 months . Social function showed small to modest gains at successive follow-ups . St and ardized response means were calculated to assess sensitivity to detect change . Confidence intervals for these indices were constructed using a jackknife procedure , and significance tests were performed by pairing selected indices . Finally , the study projected sample sizes required to assess a new therapy , using each response . These statistical tools facilitated comparisons among instruments and may prove useful in other setting
The  Childhood Health Assessment Question naire ( C-HAQ )  was the most extensively studied instrument and had high reliability , but only moderate correlations with other indices of disease activity and poor responsiveness to change in disease status .
The physician global assessment of disease activity ( PGA ) and articular indices had the strongest association with disease activity and were the most responsive to change .
Measures of psychosocial function and quality of life were moderately associated with measures of disease activity , but were less responsive to changes in disease status .
In children with JIA , no single instrument was superior in reliability or validity or in describing the impact of JIA .
Although the C-HAQ has been extensively evaluated , the PGA and articular indices appear to have the highest responsiveness to change and , therefore , the highest potential for detecting important differences in treatment response
OBJECTIVE To review the performance characteristics of the instruments most commonly used to measure clinical outcomes in juvenile idiopathic arthritis ( JIA ) , including global assessment s , articular indices , functional/disability assessment s , and quality of life measures .
METHODS As part of an Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality comparative effectiveness review of antirheumatic drugs , we explored the characteristics of commonly used outcome measures for JIA .