Overall , there is little direct evidence for components of ERAS , with much derived from nonesophageal thoracoabdominal surgery .
ERAS in principle seems logical and safe for esophagectomy .
OBJECTIVE This article aims to provide the first systematic review of enhanced recovery after surgery ( ERAS ) programs for  esophagectomy  and generate guidelines .
BACKGROUND ERAS programs use multimodal approaches to reduce complications and accelerate recovery .
Although ERAS is well established in colorectal surgery , experience after esophagectomy has been minimal .
However , esophagectomy remains an extremely high-risk operation , commonly performed in patients with significant comorbidities .
Consequently , ERAS may have a significant role to play in improving outcomes .
No guidelines or review s have been published in esophagectomy .
An enhanced recovery pathway decreases duration of stay after esophagectomy.
PURPOSE Enhanced recovery pathways ( ERP ) decrease morbidity and duration of stay after colorectal surgery . There is little information about their role in complex procedures , such as esophagectomy . The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of an ERP on duration of stay , complications , and readmissions after esophagectomy . METHODS Patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer or high- grade dysplasia from June 2009 to December 2011 were identified from a prospect ively maintained data base . Beginning in June 2010 , all patients were enrolled in a 7-day multidisciplinary ERP including written patient education with daily treatment plan , indications for intensive care admission , early structured mobilization , and diet and drain management . Short-term ( 30-day ) outcomes were compared for patients undergoing esophagectomy pre- and post-pathway . Data are expressed as median values [ interquartile range ] . RESULTS We identified 106 patients ; 47 underwent esophagectomy before ERP implementation and 59 after . Patients were similar with respect to age , gender , diagnosis , and operative time .  Hospital stay was shorter in the ERP group ( 8 [ 7 - 17 ] vs 10 [ 9 - 17 ] days ; P = .01 ) . There were no differences in rates of complications ( 59 % vs 62 % ) or readmissions ( 6 % vs 5 % ) . CONCLUSION Implementation of a multidisciplinary ERP for esophagectomy was associated with decreased duration of stay , without an increase in complications or readmissions
Overall , there is little direct evidence for components of ERAS , with much derived from nonesophageal thoracoabdominal surgery .
ERAS in principle seems logical and safe for esophagectomy .
OBJECTIVE This article aims to provide the first systematic review of enhanced recovery after surgery ( ERAS ) programs for  esophagectomy  and generate guidelines .
BACKGROUND ERAS programs use multimodal approaches to reduce complications and accelerate recovery .
Although ERAS is well established in colorectal surgery , experience after esophagectomy has been minimal .
However , esophagectomy remains an extremely high-risk operation , commonly performed in patients with significant comorbidities .
Consequently , ERAS may have a significant role to play in improving outcomes .
No guidelines or review s have been published in esophagectomy .