We found high quality evidence that hormone therapy in both primary and secondary prevention conferred no protective effects for all-cause mortality , cardiovascular death , non-fatal myocardial infa rct ion , angina , or revascularisation .
There was no strong evidence of effect on risk of stroke in this group .
Our review findings provide strong evidence that treatment with hormone therapy in post-menopausal women overall , for either primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease events has little if any benefit and causes an increase in the risk of stroke and venous thromboembolic events
BACKGROUND Evidence from systematic review s of observational studies suggests that hormone therapy may have beneficial effects in reducing the incidence of cardiovascular disease events in post-menopausal women , however the results of r and omised controlled trials ( RCTs ) have had mixed results .
This is an up date d version of a Cochrane review published in 2013 .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of hormone therapy for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in post-menopausal women , and whether there are differential effects between use in primary or secondary prevention .
Secondary aims were to undertake exploratory analyses to ( i ) assess the impact of time since menopause that treatment was commenced ( ≥ 10 years versus < 10 years ) , and where these data were not available , use age of trial participants at baseline as a proxy ( ≥ 60 years of age versus < 60 years of age ) ; and ( ii ) assess the effects of length of time on treatment .
Quality-of-life and depressive symptoms in postmenopausal women after receiving hormone therapy: results from the Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study (HERS) trial.
CONTEXT Postmenopausal hormone therapy is commonly used by women for disease prevention , but its effects on quality of life have not been well documented . OBJECTIVE To determine the effect on quality of life of estrogen plus progestin therapy used as secondary prevention in women with coronary artery disease . DESIGN , SETTING , AND PARTICIPANTS A total of 2763 postmenopausal women with documented coronary artery disease ( mean age , 67 years ) in the Heart and Estrogen/Progestin Replacement Study , a r and omized , placebo-controlled , double-blind trial conducted from January 1993 to July 1998 at outpatient and community setting s at 20 US clinical centers . INTERVENTION Participants were r and omly assigned to receive either 0.625 mg/d of conjugated equine estrogen plus 2.5 mg/d of medroxyprogesterone acetate ( n = 1380 ) or placebo ( n = 1383 ) for 36 months . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Physical activity , measured by the Duke Activity Status Index ; energy/fatigue and mental health , measured by R AND scales ; and depressive symptoms , measured on the Burnam screening scale , at 3 years of follow-up . RESULTS In all patients , scores declined significantly over 3 years for physical function ( -3.8 ; P<.001 ) , mental health ( -0.6 ; P = .05 ) , and energy/fatigue ( -3.8 ; P<.001 ) , but depressive symptoms were not significantly changed ( P = .20 ) . The effect of hormone therapy on these measures depended on the presence ( n = 434 ) or absence ( n = 2325 ) of flushing at study entry . Women with flushing who were assigned to hormone therapy had improved mental health ( + 2.6 vs - 0.5 ; P = .04 ) and fewer depressive symptoms ( -0.5 vs + 0.007 ; P = .01 ) over follow-up compared with those assigned to placebo . Women without flushing who were assigned to hormone therapy had greater declines in physical function ( -4.2 vs -3.3 ; P = .04 ) and energy/fatigue ( -4.6 vs -3.1 ; P = .03 ) over follow-up . Quality -of-life scores were significantly lower among patients with older age , diabetes , hypertension , chest pain , or heart failure . These differences in quality of life among women classified by clinical characteristics were much greater than the effects of hormone therapy . CONCLUSION Hormone therapy has mixed effects on quality of life among older women . The effects of hormone therapy depend on the presence of menopausal symptoms ; women without flushing had greater declines in physical measures , while women with flushing had improvements in emotional measures of quality of life
We found high quality evidence that hormone therapy in both primary and secondary prevention conferred no protective effects for all-cause mortality , cardiovascular death , non-fatal myocardial infa rct ion , angina , or revascularisation .
There was no strong evidence of effect on risk of stroke in this group .
Our review findings provide strong evidence that treatment with hormone therapy in post-menopausal women overall , for either primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease events has little if any benefit and causes an increase in the risk of stroke and venous thromboembolic events
BACKGROUND Evidence from systematic review s of observational studies suggests that hormone therapy may have beneficial effects in reducing the incidence of cardiovascular disease events in post-menopausal women , however the results of r and omised controlled trials ( RCTs ) have had mixed results .
This is an up date d version of a Cochrane review published in 2013 .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of hormone therapy for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in post-menopausal women , and whether there are differential effects between use in primary or secondary prevention .
Secondary aims were to undertake exploratory analyses to ( i ) assess the impact of time since menopause that treatment was commenced ( ≥ 10 years versus < 10 years ) , and where these data were not available , use age of trial participants at baseline as a proxy ( ≥ 60 years of age versus < 60 years of age ) ; and ( ii ) assess the effects of length of time on treatment .