RESULTS The meta- analysis did not reveal any effect of the type of acetabular component fixation on either survivorship or revision rate .
The preference for cementless acetabular components on the basis of improved survivorship is not supported by the published evidence .
Although concerns regarding aseptic loosening of cemented acetabular components may have led North American surgeons toward the nearly exclusive use of cementless acetabular components , the available literature suggests that the fixation of cemented acetabular components is more reliable than that of cementless components beyond the first postoperative decade
BACKGROUND The use of cementless acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty has gained popularity over the past decade .
Most total hip arthroplasties being performed in North America currently use cementless acetabular components .
The objective of this systematic review and meta- analysis was to compare the survivorship and revision rate of cemented and cementless acetabular components utilized in total hip arthroplasty .
Long term results of the Corin C-Fit uncemented total hip arthroplasty in young patients
Introduction We conducted a prospect i ve study to evaluate the long-term results after Corin C-Fit uncemented total hip arthroplasty in young patients with hydroxyapatite or porous coated components . Material s and methods We prospect ively followed 36 patients ( 38 hips ) who had Corin C-Fit uncemented total hip arthroplasties by eight experienced consultant surgeons at two centres . The acetabular and femoral components were hydroxyapatite or porous coated . Results The overall 10-year survival rate for the Corin C-Fit arthroplasty was 43 % . The 10-year survivorship for the femoral implant was 56 % and for the acetabular component 59 % . Conclusion The evidence presented in this study suggests that the Corin C-Fit uncemented total hip arthroplasty has one of the highest mid- and long-term failure rates for both femoral and acetabular components in the literature . We believe this implant should not be used and patients who have had this form of total hip arthroplasty should be kept under regular review
RESULTS The meta- analysis did not reveal any effect of the type of acetabular component fixation on either survivorship or revision rate .
The preference for cementless acetabular components on the basis of improved survivorship is not supported by the published evidence .
Although concerns regarding aseptic loosening of cemented acetabular components may have led North American surgeons toward the nearly exclusive use of cementless acetabular components , the available literature suggests that the fixation of cemented acetabular components is more reliable than that of cementless components beyond the first postoperative decade
BACKGROUND The use of cementless acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty has gained popularity over the past decade .
Most total hip arthroplasties being performed in North America currently use cementless acetabular components .
The objective of this systematic review and meta- analysis was to compare the survivorship and revision rate of cemented and cementless acetabular components utilized in total hip arthroplasty .