The evidence available from r and omised controlled trials suggested that delaying the introduction of progressive enteral feeds beyond four days after birth did not reduce the risk of developing NEC in very preterm or VLBW infants , including growth-restricted infants .
Delaying the introduction of progressive enteral feeds result ed in a few days ' delay in establishing full enteral feeds but the clinical importance of this effect was unclear .
BACKGROUND The introduction of enteral feeds for very preterm ( less than 32 weeks ' gestation ) or very low birth weight ( VLBW ; less than 1500 g ) infants is often delayed for several days or longer after birth due to concern that early introduction may not be tolerated and may increase the risk of necrotising enterocolitis ( NEC ) .
However , delaying enteral feeding could diminish the functional adaptation of the gastrointestinal tract and prolong the need for parenteral nutrition with its attendant infectious and metabolic risks .
OBJECTIVES To determine the effect of delayed introduction of progressive enteral feeds on the incidence of NEC , mortality and other morbidities in very preterm or VLBW infants .
Continuous feeding promotes gastrointestinal tolerance and growth in very low birth weight infants.
OBJECTIVE To compare the effects of continuous versus intermittent feeding on gastrointestinal tolerance and growth in very low birth weight ( VLBW ) infants . STUDY DESIGN In a r and omized , controlled trial conducted at 3 neonatal units , 70 premature infants with a gestational age 24 to 29 weeks and birth weight < 1200 g were assigned to 1 of 3 feeding methods : continuous nasogastric feeding , intermittent nasogastric feeding , or intermittent orogastric feeding . Feeding was initiated within 30 hours of birth . Daily enteral and parenteral volumes , caloric and protein intakes , growth , enteral intolerance , and clinical complications were recorded . Cox regression analysis was used to determine primary outcome , the time to achieve full enteral feeding . RESULTS The continuously fed infants achieved full enteral feeding significantly faster than the intermittently fed infants ( hazard ratio [ HR ] = 1.86 ; 95 % confidence interval [ CI ] = 1.07 to 3.22 ) . In stratified analysis according to birth weight , the improvement was even more pronounced in the smallest infants , those with birth weight < or = 850 g ( adjusted HR = 4.13 ; 95 % CI = 1.48 to 11.53 ) . Growth rate was significantly faster in the continuously fed infants ( P = .002 ) . CONCLUSION In VLBW infants , continuous feeding seems to be better than intermittent feeding with regard to gastrointestinal tolerance and growth
The evidence available from r and omised controlled trials suggested that delaying the introduction of progressive enteral feeds beyond four days after birth did not reduce the risk of developing NEC in very preterm or VLBW infants , including growth-restricted infants .
Delaying the introduction of progressive enteral feeds result ed in a few days ' delay in establishing full enteral feeds but the clinical importance of this effect was unclear .
BACKGROUND The introduction of enteral feeds for very preterm ( less than 32 weeks ' gestation ) or very low birth weight ( VLBW ; less than 1500 g ) infants is often delayed for several days or longer after birth due to concern that early introduction may not be tolerated and may increase the risk of necrotising enterocolitis ( NEC ) .
However , delaying enteral feeding could diminish the functional adaptation of the gastrointestinal tract and prolong the need for parenteral nutrition with its attendant infectious and metabolic risks .
OBJECTIVES To determine the effect of delayed introduction of progressive enteral feeds on the incidence of NEC , mortality and other morbidities in very preterm or VLBW infants .