TSA indicated lack of firm evidence for the results of the meta‐analytic outcomes on clinical and radiographic success .
Conclusion BD and MTA have similar clinical and radiographic success rates based on limited and low‐ quality evidence .
Objectives Pulpotomy is the favored treatment for pulp exposure in carious primary teeth .
This review aim ed to compare the success rates of biodentine ( BD ) and mineral trioxide aggregate ( MTA ) pulpotomies  in primary molars using meta‐ analysis ( MA ) and trial sequential analysis ( TSA ) and also to assess the quality of the results by Grading of Recommendations , Assessment , Development and Evaluation ( GRADE ) .
Response of human dental pulp capped with biodentine and mineral trioxide aggregate.
INTRODUCTION Biodentine is a new bioactive cement that is similar to the widely used mineral trioxide aggregate ( MTA ) . It has dentin-like mechanical properties , which may be considered a suitable material for clinical indications of dentin-pulp complex regeneration such as direct pulp capping . The purpose of the present study was to compare the response of the pulp-dentin complex in human teeth after direct capping with this new tricalcium silicate-based cement with that of MTA . METHODS Pulps in 28 caries-free maxillary and m and ibular permanent intact human molars scheduled for extraction for orthodontic reasons were mechanically exposed and assigned to 1 of 2 experimental groups , Biodentine or MTA , and 1 control group . Assay of periapical response and clinical examination were performed . After 6 weeks , the teeth were extracted , stained with hematoxylin-eosin , and categorized by using a histologic scoring system . RESULTS The majority of specimens showed complete dentinal bridge formation and an absence of inflammatory pulp response . Layers of well-arranged odontoblast and odontoblast-like cells were found to form tubular dentin under the osteodentin . Statistical analysis showed no significant differences between the Biodentine and MTA experimental groups during the observation period . CONCLUSIONS Within the limitations of this study , Biodentine had a similar efficacy in the clinical setting and may be considered an interesting alternative to MTA in pulp-capping treatment during vital pulp therapy
TSA indicated lack of firm evidence for the results of the meta‐analytic outcomes on clinical and radiographic success .
Conclusion BD and MTA have similar clinical and radiographic success rates based on limited and low‐ quality evidence .
Objectives Pulpotomy is the favored treatment for pulp exposure in carious primary teeth .
This review aim ed to compare the success rates of biodentine ( BD ) and mineral trioxide aggregate ( MTA ) pulpotomies  in primary molars using meta‐ analysis ( MA ) and trial sequential analysis ( TSA ) and also to assess the quality of the results by Grading of Recommendations , Assessment , Development and Evaluation ( GRADE ) .