Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
Effects of nonlinear aerobic training on erectile dysfunction and cardiovascular function following radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer.
UNLABELLED Erectile dysfunction ( ED ) is a major adverse effect of radical prostatectomy ( RP ) . We conducted a r and omized controlled trial to examine the efficacy of aerobic training ( AT ) compared with usual care ( UC ) on ED prevalence in 50 men ( n=25 per group ) after RP . AT consisted of five walking sessions per week at 55 - 100 % of peak oxygen uptake ( VO2peak ) for 30 - 60 min per session following a nonlinear prescription . The primary outcome was change in the prevalence of ED , as measured by the International Index of Erectile Function ( IIEF ) , from baseline to 6 mo . Secondary outcomes were brachial artery flow-mediated dilation ( FMD ) , VO2peak , cardiovascular ( CV ) risk profile ( eg , lipid profile , body composition ) , and patient-reported outcomes ( PROs ) . The prevalence of ED ( IIEF score ≤ 21 ) decreased by 20 % in the AT group and by 24 % in the UC group ( difference : p=0.406 ) . There were no significant between-group differences in any erectile function subscale ( p>0.05 ) . Significant between-group differences were observed for changes in FMD and VO2peak , favoring AT . There were no group differences in other markers of CV risk profile or PROs . In summary , nonlinear AT does not improve ED in men with localized prostate cancer in the acute period following RP . TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinical trials.gov identifier NCT00620932
Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?