Conclusion Based on this literature review , the disease-specificHAQ and the generic SF-36 can currently be most confidently recommended to measure PF in RA for most research purpose s. The HAQ , however , was frequently associated with considerable ceiling effects while the SF-36 has limited content coverage .
Background The aim of this study was to systematic ally review the content validity and measurement properties of all physical function ( PF ) scales which are currently vali date d for use with patients with rheumatoid arthritis ( RA ) .
Sensitivity of a health status measure to short-term clinical changes in arthritis.
To assess the sensitivity of the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales ( AIMS ) , we analyzed data from 3 clinical trials . One trial involving 255 patients with rheumatoid arthritis ( RA ) was a 12-week , r and omized controlled trail of diclofenac , naproxen , and aspirin . Two trials were open-label studies of 24 weeks duration that included 165 RA and 355 osteoarthritis ( OA ) patients , all of whom were treated with diclofenac .  In addition to the AIMS , tender joint count , morning stiffness , and erythrocyte sedimentation rate were used as outcome measures in the trials . The AIMS results showed substantial improvements in Physical Function , Psychological Status , and Pain , as well as in overall Arthritis Impact . These improvements were detected by the time of the initial outcome assessment at 4 weeks or 8 weeks , and were detected in patients with either OA or RA . These AIMS results closely parallel improvements shown by traditional clinical measures , and demonstrate that the AIMS health status measure is sensitive to improvements in OA as well as in RA . The AIMS also detects responses produced by therapy with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs ( NSAIDs ) , and these improvements can be demonstrated in as short a treatment time as 4 weeks . These findings confirm the utility of the AIMS for assessing outcome in rheumatic disease studies , and they have implication s for the design of future clinical trials of NSAIDs
Conclusion Based on this literature review , the disease-specificHAQ and the generic SF-36 can currently be most confidently recommended to measure PF in RA for most research purpose s. The HAQ , however , was frequently associated with considerable ceiling effects while the SF-36 has limited content coverage .
Background The aim of this study was to systematic ally review the content validity and measurement properties of all physical function ( PF ) scales which are currently vali date d for use with patients with rheumatoid arthritis ( RA ) .