Conclusions  Electronic self-monitoring of mood in depression appears to be a valid measure of mood in contrast to self-monitoring of mood in mania .
Background Various paper-based mood charting instruments are used in the monitoring of symptoms in bipolar disorder .
During recent years an increasing number of electronic self-monitoring tools have been developed .
The objectives of this systematic review were 1 ) to evaluate the validity of electronic self-monitoring tools as a method of evaluating mood compared to clinical rating scales for depression and mania and 2 ) to investigate the effect of electronic self-monitoring tools on clinical ly relevant outcomes in bipolar disorder .
There are yet few studies on the effect of  electronic self-monitoring of mood  in bipolar disorder .
A Pilot Study of Mood Ratings Captured by Mobile Phone Versus Paper-and-Pencil Mood Charts in Bipolar Disorder
Objective : Patient-reported mood charts are frequently used in management of bipolar disorder . Although mood charts have recently been programmed in electronic devices such as mobile phones , little is known about the impact of the method of data capture on the psychometric properties and validity of these data . Methods : In an ongoing pilot study , a sample of out patients with bipolar disorder were r and omized to complete mood charts either on a mobile phone or with st and ard paper and pencil as part of a 12-week intervention ( primary outcomes for the trial await study completion ) . We compared these conditions across a single item rating of mood state , and we hypothesized that mobile phone-based data capture would produce greater compliance to mood ratings , variability between and within participants , and concurrent validity with blinded clinician-rated affective symptom severity . Results : A total of 56 participants were r and omized and 40 participants were included in the analyses . There were no significant differences between conditions on demographic or clinical variables . The rate of compliance was significantly higher in paper- and -pencil versus mobile phone ratings . Ratings demonstrated significantly more variability within individuals in the mobile phone condition . Mobile phone mood ratings were significantly correlated with clinician-rated depressive symptom severity across the study and with manic symptom severity at the week-6 assessment , whereas paper- and -pencil ratings were not significantly associated with clinician-rated depression or mania . Conclusions : Although preliminary , our results suggest a lower rate of compliance with mobile phones compared to paper- and -pencil daily mood rating in bipolar disorder , yet a greater ability to capture variability and concurrent validity in quantifying affective symptoms . This clinical trial is registered at www . clinical trials.gov as NCT01670123
Conclusions  Electronic self-monitoring of mood in depression appears to be a valid measure of mood in contrast to self-monitoring of mood in mania .
Background Various paper-based mood charting instruments are used in the monitoring of symptoms in bipolar disorder .
During recent years an increasing number of electronic self-monitoring tools have been developed .
The objectives of this systematic review were 1 ) to evaluate the validity of electronic self-monitoring tools as a method of evaluating mood compared to clinical rating scales for depression and mania and 2 ) to investigate the effect of electronic self-monitoring tools on clinical ly relevant outcomes in bipolar disorder .
There are yet few studies on the effect of  electronic self-monitoring of mood  in bipolar disorder .