Conclusion Meta- analysis of r and omized data demonstrated that CF guidance does not improve the safety or efficacy of AF ablation , despite initial observational data showing dramatic improvement .
Aims Despite widespread adoption of contact force ( CF ) sensing technology in atrial fibrillation ( AF ) ablation , r and omized data suggests lack of improvement in clinical outcomes .
We aim ed to assess the safety and efficacy of CF-guided vs. non CF-guided AF ablation .
Comparison of contact force-guided procedure with non-contact force-guided procedure during left atrial mapping and pulmonary vein isolation: impact of contact force on recurrence of atrial fibrillation
Background The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of contact force ( CF ) visualization on the incidence of low and high CF during left atrial ( LA ) mapping and pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) . Methods CF was assessed in 70 patients who underwent PVI .  Three highly experienced operators performed all procedures . The operators were blinded to CF in group A ( 35 patients ) , and CF was displayed in group B ( 35 patients ) . In group B , optimal CF was defined as mean CF between 10 and 39 g , and operators attempted to acquire points and ablate within this range . Results A total of 8401 mapping points were analyzed during LA mapping ( group A : 4104 , group B : 4297 ) . Low CF < 10 g and high CF ≥40 g were noted in a significantly larger number of points in group A ( 37.7 vs. 12.0 % , P < 0.001 ; 11.5 vs. 1.5 % , P < 0.001 ) . At the mitral isthmus and ridge areas , CF was significantly lower ( 7.7 vs. 12.2 g , P < 0.001 ; 5.3 vs. 11.7 g , P < 0.001 ) in group A than in group B. PVI was successfully achieved in all patients . There were significant site-dependent CF differences between the two groups . Optimal CF was achieved in significantly more applications in group B ( P < 0.001 ) . There was no significant difference in atrial fibrillation ( AF ) recurrence rates after a minimum follow-up of 1 year between the two groups in this cohort ( P = 0.24 ) . No significant peri-procedural complications occurred in either group . Conclusions CF visualization can assist in avoiding both low and high CF , which may have the potential to improve lesion formation and patient safety profile . In this study , CF-guided ablation did not affect AF recurrence
Conclusion Meta- analysis of r and omized data demonstrated that CF guidance does not improve the safety or efficacy of AF ablation , despite initial observational data showing dramatic improvement .
Aims Despite widespread adoption of contact force ( CF ) sensing technology in atrial fibrillation ( AF ) ablation , r and omized data suggests lack of improvement in clinical outcomes .
We aim ed to assess the safety and efficacy of CF-guided vs. non CF-guided AF ablation .