Screening protocol s have high predictive values to detect cervical spine fracture in alert , low-risk patients seeking emergency care after blunt neck trauma .
Computerized tomography ( CT ) scans had better validity ( in adults and elderly ) than radiographs in assessing high-risk and /or multi-injured blunt trauma neck patients .
In the absence of serious pathology , clinical physical examinations are more predictive at excluding than confirming structural lesions causing neurologic compression .
One exception is the manual provocation test for cervical radiculopathy , which has high positive predictive value .
There was no evidence that specific MRI findings are associated with neck pain , cervicogenic headache , or whiplash exposure .
No evidence supports using cervical provocative discography , anesthetic facet , or medial branch blocks in evaluating neck pain .
Reliable and valid self-report question naires are useful in assessing pain , function , disability , and psychosocial status in individuals with neck pain .
CONCLUSION The scientific evidence supports screening protocol s in emergency care for low-risk patients ; and CT-scans for high-risk patients with blunt trauma to the neck .
In nonemergency neck pain without radiculopathy , the validity of most commonly used objective tests is lacking .
OBJECTIVE To critically appraise and synthesize the literature on assessment of  neck pain .
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA The published literature on assessment of neck pain is large and of variable quality .
There have been no prior systematic review s of this literature .
The ability to change of three questionnaires for neck pain.
OBJECTIVE To assess the sensitivity to change of three algofunctional scales for neck pain . METHODS Observational , prospect i ve study . Patients with neck disorders were included .  Pain and patients ' perceived h and icap assessed on visual analogue scales ( VAS Pain , VAS H and icap ) , and functional disability measures ( Neck Disability Index , Neck Pain and Disability Scale , Northwick Park Neck Pain Question naire  )  were recorded twice , at baseline and at an 11-month follow-up assessment . Sensitivity to change was assessed using the effect size ( ES ) and the st and ardised response mean ( SRM ) , and the non-parametric Spearman 's rank correlation coefficient ( r ) was used to assess the correlation between quantitative variable changes and patients ' overall opinion . Analysis of variance ( ANOVA ) followed by a Tukey-test was performed to determine if the scales distinguished improved , stable , and deteriorated patients . RESULTS Seventy-one patients ( 43 women , mean age 49 years ) were included and evaluated twice at an interval of 11 + /- 2 months . The three scales showed good sensitivity to change . The ANOVA showed a group effect , and individual changes in the scales scores were statistically different in two-by-two comparisons ( improved , stable or deteriorated patients ) . Changes in NPDS scores had the highest correlation with patient 's overall assessment ( r = 0.592 ) . CONCLUSION The three scales can detect changes in patients with neck disorders . Changes in NPDS score had the best correlation with patients ' overall opinion concerning their neck disorder and this question naire should be given preference in clinical trials
Screening protocol s have high predictive values to detect cervical spine fracture in alert , low-risk patients seeking emergency care after blunt neck trauma .
Computerized tomography ( CT ) scans had better validity ( in adults and elderly ) than radiographs in assessing high-risk and /or multi-injured blunt trauma neck patients .
In the absence of serious pathology , clinical physical examinations are more predictive at excluding than confirming structural lesions causing neurologic compression .
One exception is the manual provocation test for cervical radiculopathy , which has high positive predictive value .
There was no evidence that specific MRI findings are associated with neck pain , cervicogenic headache , or whiplash exposure .
No evidence supports using cervical provocative discography , anesthetic facet , or medial branch blocks in evaluating neck pain .
Reliable and valid self-report question naires are useful in assessing pain , function , disability , and psychosocial status in individuals with neck pain .
CONCLUSION The scientific evidence supports screening protocol s in emergency care for low-risk patients ; and CT-scans for high-risk patients with blunt trauma to the neck .
In nonemergency neck pain without radiculopathy , the validity of most commonly used objective tests is lacking .
OBJECTIVE To critically appraise and synthesize the literature on assessment of  neck pain .
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA The published literature on assessment of neck pain is large and of variable quality .
There have been no prior systematic review s of this literature .