There was no major difference in the rate of complications .
Conclusions Short-term recovery favors limited incision over st and ard incision THA .
Background The literature comparing  limited incision and st and ard incision THAs  is confusing regarding whether limited incision THA improves short-term recovery without compromising long-term durability and survival .
Further , previously published meta-analyses can not conclude that limited incision THA is better .
With new data , we seek to discover if the answers now exist .
Purpose We used meta- analysis to compare surgical and hospitalization data , clinical outcomes , and complication rates , and thus ( 1 ) confirm whether limited incision THA is at least comparable to st and ard incision THA ; and ( 2 ) determine whether limited incision THA is an improvement over st and ard incision THA .
Mini-incision for total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, controlled investigation with 5-year follow-up evaluation.
A group of 42 primary total hip arthroplasties performed through an abridged surgical incision ( group 1 ) was prospect ively compared to a cohort of 42 primary total hip arthroplasties performed through a st and ard surgical incision ( group 2 ) . The length of the incision was 8.8 + /- 1.5 cm for group 1 and 23.0 + /- 2.1 cm for group 2 . The groups were not significantly different with respect to age , height , preoperative Harris Hip scores ( HHS ) , estimated blood loss , or length of hospital stay ( P>.05 ) . Group 1 patients had a lower body mass index than group 2 patients ( P<.01 ) . Length of surgery was slightly less for group I ( P = .02 ) . A 0 % incidence was found of infection , nerve palsy , component malposition , and aseptic loosening in both groups . No dislocations occurred in group 1 , and one dislocation occurred in group 2 . Patients in group 1 have expressed considerable enthusiasm regarding the cosmetic appearance of the surgical incisions , and their postoperative HHS are slightly higher than those of group 2 ( P = .042 ) . Total hip arthroplasty can be performed safely and effectively through an abridged surgical incision , but this investigation confirms no dramatic clinical benefit other than cosmetic appeal
There was no major difference in the rate of complications .
Conclusions Short-term recovery favors limited incision over st and ard incision THA .
Background The literature comparing  limited incision and st and ard incision THAs  is confusing regarding whether limited incision THA improves short-term recovery without compromising long-term durability and survival .
Further , previously published meta-analyses can not conclude that limited incision THA is better .
With new data , we seek to discover if the answers now exist .
Purpose We used meta- analysis to compare surgical and hospitalization data , clinical outcomes , and complication rates , and thus ( 1 ) confirm whether limited incision THA is at least comparable to st and ard incision THA ; and ( 2 ) determine whether limited incision THA is an improvement over st and ard incision THA .