Multifaceted interventions targeting high-risk patients and their primary care providers may improve the management of osteoporosis , but improvements are often clinical ly modest
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of primary care interventions to improve the detection and treatment of osteoporosis .
Persistence, reproducibility, and cost-effectiveness of an intervention to improve the quality of osteoporosis care after a fracture of the wrist: results of a controlled trial
Introduction Older patients with fragility fractures are not commonly tested or treated for osteoporosis . Compared to usual care , a previously reported intervention led to 30 % absolute increases in osteoporosis treatment within 6 months of wrist fracture . Our objective was to examine longer-term outcomes , reproducibility , and cost-effectiveness of this intervention . Methods We conducted an extended analysis of a non-r and omized controlled trial with blinded ascertainment of outcomes that compared a multifaceted intervention to usual care controls .  Patients > 50 years with a wrist fracture treated in two Emergency Departments in the province of Alberta , Canada were included ; those already treated for osteoporosis were excluded . Overall , 102 patients participated in this study ( 55 intervention and 47 controls ; median age : 66 years ; 78 % were women ) . The interventions consisted of faxed physician reminders that contained osteoporosis treatment guidelines endorsed by opinion leaders and patient counseling . Controls received usual care ; at 6-months post-fracture , when the original trial was completed , all controls were crossed-over to intervention . The main outcomes were rates of osteoporosis testing and treatment within 6 months ( original study ) and 1 year ( delayed intervention ) of fracture , and 1-year persistence with treatments started . From the perspective of the healthcare payer , the cost-effectiveness ( using a Markov decision-analytic model ) of the intervention was compared with usual care over a lifetime horizon . Results Overall , 40 % of the intervention patients ( vs. 10 % of the controls ) started treatment within 6 months post-fracture , and 82 % ( 95%CI : 67–96 % ) had persisted with it at 1-year post-fracture . Delaying the intervention to controls for 6 months still led to equivalent rates of bone mineral density ( BMD ) testing ( 64 vs. 60 % in the original study ; p = 0.72 ) and osteoporosis treatment ( 43 vs. 40 % ; p = 0.77 ) as previously reported . Compared with usual care , the intervention strategy was dominant – per patient , it led to a $ 13 Canadian ( U.S. $ 9 ) cost savings and a gain of 0.012 quality -adjusted life years . Base-case results were most sensitive to assumptions about treatment cost ; for example , a 50 % increase in the price of osteoporosis medication led to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $ 24,250 Canadian ( U.S. $ 17,218 ) per quality -adjusted life year gained . Conclusions A pragmatic intervention directed at patients and physicians led to substantial improvements in osteoporosis treatment , even when delivered 6-months post-fracture . From the healthcare payer ’s perspective , the intervention appears to have led to both cost-savings and gains in life expectancy
Multifaceted interventions targeting high-risk patients and their primary care providers may improve the management of osteoporosis , but improvements are often clinical ly modest
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of primary care interventions to improve the detection and treatment of osteoporosis .