RESULTS Knowledge translation interventions appear to have result ed in a positive change in physiotherapist beliefs , attitudes , skills and guideline awareness .
However , no consistent improvement in clinical practice , patient and economic outcomes were observed .
AND IMPLICATION OF KEY FINDINGS The intensity and type of knowledge translation intervention seem to have an effect on practice change .
BACKGROUND Many physiotherapists underuse evidence -based practice guidelines or recommendations when treating patients with musculoskeletal disorders , yet synthesis of knowledge translation interventions used within the field of physiotherapy fails to offer clear conclusions to guide the implementation of clinical practice guidelines .
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effectiveness of various  knowledge translation interventions used to implement changes in the practice of current physiotherapists treating common musculoskeletal issues .
Evaluating two implementation strategies for whiplash guidelines in physiotherapy: a cluster randomised trial.
QUESTION Are implementation strategies involving education any more effective than mere dissemination of clinical practice guidelines in changing physiotherapy practice and reducing patient disability after acute whiplash ? DESIGN Cluster-r and omised trial . PARTICIPANTS Twenty-seven physiotherapists from different private physiotherapy clinics and the 103 patients ( 4 dropouts ) who presented to them with acute whiplash . INTERVENTION The implementation group of physiotherapists underwent education by opinion leaders about whiplash guidelines and the dissemination group had the guidelines mailed to them . OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was patient disability , measured using the Functional Rating Index , collected on admission to the trial and at 1.5 , 3 , 6 and 12 months . Physiotherapist knowledge about the guidelines was measured using a custom-made question naire . Physiotherapist practice and cost of care were measured by audit of patient notes . RESULTS There were no significant differences between groups for any of the patient outcomes at any time . The implementation patients had 0.6 points ( 95 % CI -7.8 to 6.6 ) less disability than the dissemination patients at 12 months ; 44 % more physiotherapists in the implementation group reported that they prescribed two out of the five guideline -recommended treatments ; and 32 % more physiotherapists actually prescribed them . The cost of care for patients in the implementation group was $ 255 ( 95 % CI -1505 to 996 ) less than for patients in the dissemination group . CONCLUSION Although the active implementation program increased guideline -consistent practice , patient outcomes and cost of care were not affected
RESULTS Knowledge translation interventions appear to have result ed in a positive change in physiotherapist beliefs , attitudes , skills and guideline awareness .
However , no consistent improvement in clinical practice , patient and economic outcomes were observed .
AND IMPLICATION OF KEY FINDINGS The intensity and type of knowledge translation intervention seem to have an effect on practice change .
BACKGROUND Many physiotherapists underuse evidence -based practice guidelines or recommendations when treating patients with musculoskeletal disorders , yet synthesis of knowledge translation interventions used within the field of physiotherapy fails to offer clear conclusions to guide the implementation of clinical practice guidelines .
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effectiveness of various  knowledge translation interventions used to implement changes in the practice of current physiotherapists treating common musculoskeletal issues .