We did not find any differences between PSI and SI with respect to any other parameters .
Conclusions PSI  has advantages in axial alignment of the femoral component , operative time , and perioperative blood loss relative to SI .
No significant differences were found between PSI and SI with respect to alignment of the remaining components , number of outliers , or length of hospital stay .
Purpose The purpose of the present study was to compare patient-specific instrumentation ( PSI ) with st and ard instrumentation ( SI ) in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty ( TKA ) .
PSI is hypothesized to have advantages with respect to component alignment ; number of outliers ( defined as alignment > 3 ° from the target alignment ) ; operative time ; perioperative blood loss ; and length of hospital stay .
This new surgical technique is expected to exhibit superior performance .
Patient-specific instrumentation improved mechanical alignment, while early clinical outcome was comparable to conventional instrumentation in TKA
Abstract Purpose The aim of this prospect i ve study was to compare early clinical outcome , radiological limb alignment , and three-dimensional (3D)-component positioning between conventional and computed tomography (CT)-based patient-specific instrumentation ( PSI ) in primary mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty ( TKA ) . Methods Two hundred ninety consecutive patients ( 300 knees ) with severe , debilitating osteoarthritis scheduled for TKA were included in this study using either conventional instrumentation ( CVI , n = 150 ) or PSI ( n = 150 ) . Patients were clinical ly assessed before and 2 years after surgery according to the Knee-Society-Score ( KSS ) and the visual-analog-scale for pain ( VAS ) . Additionally , the Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index ( WOMAC ) and the Oxford-Knee-Score ( OKS ) were collected at follow-up . To evaluate accuracy of CVI and PSI , hip-knee-ankle angle ( HKA ) and 3D-component positioning were assessed on postoperative radiographs and CT . Results Data of 222 knees ( CVI : n = 108 , PSI : n = 114 ) were available for analysis after a mean follow-up of 28.6 ± 5.2 months . At the early follow-up , clinical outcome ( KSS , VAS , WOMAC , OKS ) was comparable between the two groups . Mean HKA-deviation from the targeted neutral mechanical axis ( CVI : 2.2 ° ± 1.7 ° ; PSI : 1.5 ° ± 1.4 ° ; p < 0.001 ) , rates of outliers ( CVI : 22.2 % ; PSI : 9.6 % ; p = 0.016 ) , and 3D-component positioning outliers were significantly lower in the PSI group . Non-outliers ( HKA : 180 ° ± 3 ° ) showed better clinical results than outliers at the 2-year follow-up . Conclusions CT-based PSI compared with CVI improves accuracy of mechanical alignment restoration and 3D-component positioning in primary TKA . While clinical outcome was comparable between the two instrumentation groups at early follow-up , significantly inferior outcome was detected in the subgroup of HKA-outliers . Level of evidence Prospect i ve comparative study , Level II
We did not find any differences between PSI and SI with respect to any other parameters .
Conclusions PSI  has advantages in axial alignment of the femoral component , operative time , and perioperative blood loss relative to SI .
No significant differences were found between PSI and SI with respect to alignment of the remaining components , number of outliers , or length of hospital stay .
Purpose The purpose of the present study was to compare patient-specific instrumentation ( PSI ) with st and ard instrumentation ( SI ) in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty ( TKA ) .
PSI is hypothesized to have advantages with respect to component alignment ; number of outliers ( defined as alignment > 3 ° from the target alignment ) ; operative time ; perioperative blood loss ; and length of hospital stay .
This new surgical technique is expected to exhibit superior performance .