At the class level , behavioural therapy ( alone or in combination with stimulants ) , stimulants , and non-stimulant seemed significantly more efficacious than placebo .
Behavioural therapy in combination with stimulants seemed superior to stimulants or non-stimulants .
Stimulants seemed superior to behavioural therapy , cognitive training and non-stimulants .
Behavioural therapy , stimulants and their combination showed the best profile of acceptability .
Stimulants and non-stimulants seemed well tolerated .
Among medications , methylpheni date , amphetamine , atomoxetine , guanfacine and clonidine seemed significantly more efficacious than placebo .
Methylpheni date and amphetamine seemed more efficacious than atomoxetine and guanfacine .
Methylpheni date and clonidine seemed better accepted than placebo and atomoxetine .
Most of the efficacious pharmacological treatments were associated with harms ( anorexia , weight loss and insomnia ) , but an increased risk of serious adverse events was not observed .
There is lack of evidence for cognitive training , neurofeedback , antidepressants , antipsychotics , dietary therapy , fatty acids , and other complementary and alternative medicine .
Clinical differences may exist between the pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment used for the management of ADHD .
BACKGROUND Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder ( ADHD ) is one of the most commonly diagnosed psychiatric disorders in childhood .
A wide variety of treatments have been used for the management of ADHD .
We aim ed to compare the efficacy and safety of pharmacological , psychological and complementary and alternative medicine interventions for the treatment of ADHD in children and adolescents .
Clonidine for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: I. Efficacy and tolerability outcomes.
OBJECTIVE To determine the efficacy and safety of clonidine , used alone or in combination with methylpheni date , in treating attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder ( ADHD ) . METHOD A 16-week , r and omized , double-blind , placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted in 122 children , ages 7 to 12 , with any subtype of ADHD , r and omly assigned to clonidine , methylpheni date , clonidine in combination with methylpheni date , or placebo according to a 2 x 2 factorial design . In two successive 4-week titration periods , clonidine ( or matching placebo ) and added methylpheni date ( or matching placebo ) were adjusted to optimal doses and then continued for 8 weeks . The primary efficacy outcome was changed from baseline to week 16 on the Conners Teachers Abbreviated Symptom Question naire . Secondary outcomes included the Conners Abbreviated Symptom Question naire for Parents and the Children 's Global Assessment Scale . RESULTS On the Conners Teachers Abbreviated Symptom Question naire , clonidine was not found to improve ADHD symptoms , whereas subjects treated with methylpheni date showed significant improvement compared to those not treated with methylpheni date . Subjects treated with clonidine had greater improvements on the Conners Abbreviated Symptom Question naire for Parents and Children 's Global Assessment Scale , but also a higher rate of sedation compared with subjects not treated with clonidine . CONCLUSIONS Based on the Conners Teachers Abbreviated Symptom Question naire , methylpheni date offers the best combination of efficacy and tolerability for ADHD . Clonidine was well tolerated despite the frequency of sedation and did offer some benefit
At the class level , behavioural therapy ( alone or in combination with stimulants ) , stimulants , and non-stimulant seemed significantly more efficacious than placebo .
Behavioural therapy in combination with stimulants seemed superior to stimulants or non-stimulants .
Stimulants seemed superior to behavioural therapy , cognitive training and non-stimulants .
Behavioural therapy , stimulants and their combination showed the best profile of acceptability .
Stimulants and non-stimulants seemed well tolerated .
Among medications , methylpheni date , amphetamine , atomoxetine , guanfacine and clonidine seemed significantly more efficacious than placebo .
Methylpheni date and amphetamine seemed more efficacious than atomoxetine and guanfacine .
Methylpheni date and clonidine seemed better accepted than placebo and atomoxetine .
Most of the efficacious pharmacological treatments were associated with harms ( anorexia , weight loss and insomnia ) , but an increased risk of serious adverse events was not observed .
There is lack of evidence for cognitive training , neurofeedback , antidepressants , antipsychotics , dietary therapy , fatty acids , and other complementary and alternative medicine .
Clinical differences may exist between the pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment used for the management of ADHD .
BACKGROUND Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder ( ADHD ) is one of the most commonly diagnosed psychiatric disorders in childhood .
A wide variety of treatments have been used for the management of ADHD .
We aim ed to compare the efficacy and safety of pharmacological , psychological and complementary and alternative medicine interventions for the treatment of ADHD in children and adolescents .