Women taking HT had a significantly decreased incidence of fracture with long-term use .
Research ers found no strong evidence that HT has a clinical ly meaningful impact on the incidence of colorectal cancer .
AUTHORS ' CONCLUSIONS : Women with intolerable menopausal symptoms may wish to weigh the benefits of symptom relief against the small absolute risk of harm arising from short-term use of low-dose HT , provided they do not have specific contraindications .
HT may be unsuitable for some women , including those at increased risk of cardiovascular disease , increased risk of thromboembolic disease ( such as those with obesity or a history of venous thrombosis ) or increased risk of some types of cancer ( such as breast cancer , in women with a uterus ) .
The risk of endometrial cancer among women with a uterus taking oestrogen-only HT is well documented .
HT is not indicated for primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease or dementia , nor for prevention of deterioration of cognitive function in postmenopausal women .
Although HT is considered effective for the prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis , it is generally recommended as an option only for women at significant risk for whom non-oestrogen therapies are unsuitable .
BACKGROUND : Hormone therapy ( HT ) is widely provided for control of menopausal symptoms and has been used for the management and prevention of cardiovascular disease , osteoporosis and  dementia in older women .
This is an up date d version of a Cochrane review first published in 2005 .
OBJECTIVES : To assess effects of long-term HT ( at least 1 year 's duration ) on mortality , cardiovascular outcomes , cancer , gallbladder disease , fracture and cognition in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women during and after cessation of treatment .
Effects of estrogen plus progestin on gynecologic cancers and associated diagnostic procedures: the Women's Health Initiative randomized trial.
CONTEXT The effects of continuous combined hormone therapy on gynecologic cancers have not been investigated previously in a r and omized trial setting . OBJECTIVE To determine the possible associations of estrogen plus progestin on gynecologic cancers and related diagnostic procedures . DESIGN , SETTING , AND PARTICIPANTS R and omized , double-blind , placebo-controlled trial of 16 608 postmenopausal women , who had not had a hysterectomy at baseline and who had been recruited from 40 US clinical centers between September 1993 and October 1998 ( average follow-up , 5.6 years ) . INTERVENTION One tablet per day containing 0.625 mg of conjugated equine estrogens plus 2.5 mg of medroxyprogesterone acetate ( n = 8506 ) or placebo ( n = 8102 ) . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Incident invasive cancer of the ovary and endometrium . RESULTS In 5.6 years of follow-up , there were 32 cases of invasive ovarian cancer , 58 cases of endometrial cancer , 1 case of nonendometrial uterine cancer , 13 cases of cervical cancer , and 7 cases of other gynecologic cancers . The hazard ratio ( HR ) for invasive ovarian cancer in women assigned to estrogen plus progestin compared with placebo was 1.58 ( 95 % confidence interval [ CI ] , 0.77 - 3.24 ) . The HR for endometrial cancer was 0.81 ( 95 % CI , 0.48 - 1.36 ) . No appreciable differences were found in the distributions of tumor histology , stage , or grade for either cancer site . The incidence of other gynecologic cancers was low and did not differ by r and omization assignment . More women taking estrogen plus progestin required endometrial biopsies ( 33 % vs 6 % ; P<.001 ) . CONCLUSIONS This r and omized trial suggests that continuous combined estrogen plus progestin therapy may increase the risk of ovarian cancer while producing endometrial cancer rates similar to placebo . The increased burden of endometrial biopsies required to assess vaginal bleeding further limits the acceptability of this regimen . These data provide additional support for caution in the use of continuous combined hormones
Women taking HT had a significantly decreased incidence of fracture with long-term use .
Research ers found no strong evidence that HT has a clinical ly meaningful impact on the incidence of colorectal cancer .
AUTHORS ' CONCLUSIONS : Women with intolerable menopausal symptoms may wish to weigh the benefits of symptom relief against the small absolute risk of harm arising from short-term use of low-dose HT , provided they do not have specific contraindications .
HT may be unsuitable for some women , including those at increased risk of cardiovascular disease , increased risk of thromboembolic disease ( such as those with obesity or a history of venous thrombosis ) or increased risk of some types of cancer ( such as breast cancer , in women with a uterus ) .
The risk of endometrial cancer among women with a uterus taking oestrogen-only HT is well documented .
HT is not indicated for primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease or dementia , nor for prevention of deterioration of cognitive function in postmenopausal women .
Although HT is considered effective for the prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis , it is generally recommended as an option only for women at significant risk for whom non-oestrogen therapies are unsuitable .
BACKGROUND : Hormone therapy ( HT ) is widely provided for control of menopausal symptoms and has been used for the management and prevention of cardiovascular disease , osteoporosis and  dementia in older women .
This is an up date d version of a Cochrane review first published in 2005 .
OBJECTIVES : To assess effects of long-term HT ( at least 1 year 's duration ) on mortality , cardiovascular outcomes , cancer , gallbladder disease , fracture and cognition in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women during and after cessation of treatment .