Patients experienced significant post-THR improvements in Harris Hip scores , but this did not differ between impact types .
Recipients of cross-linked vs. conventional polyethylene cup liners experienced reduced femoral head penetration and revision .
There was no impact of femoral stem fixation and cup shell design on implant survival rates .
Evidence on mortality and complications ( aseptic loosening , femoral fracture ) was inconclusive .
BACKGROUND Evolvements in the design , fixation methods , size , and bearing surface of implants for  total hip replacement ( THR ) have led to a variety of options for healthcare professionals to consider .
The need to determine the most optimal combinations of THR implant is warranted .
This systematic review evaluated the clinical effectiveness of different types of THR used for the treatment of end stage arthritis of the hip .
A randomised controlled trial of total hip arthroplasty versus resurfacing arthroplasty in the treatment of young patients with arthritis of the hip joint
Background Hip replacement ( arthroplasty ) surgery is a highly successful treatment for patients with severe symptomatic arthritis of the hip joint . For older patients , several design s of Total Hip Arthroplasty have shown excellent results in terms of both function and value for money . However , in younger more active patients , there is approximately a 50 % failure rate at 25 years for traditional implants . Hip resurfacing is a relatively new arthroplasty technique . In a recent review of the literature on resurfacing arthroplasty it was concluded that the short-term functional results appear promising but some potential early disadvantages were identified , including the risk of femoral neck fracture and collapse of the head of the femur . The aim of the current study is to assess whether there is a difference in functional hip scores at one year post-operation between Total Hip Arthroplasty and Resurfacing Arthroplasty . Secondary aims include assessment of complication rates for both procedures as well cost effectiveness . Methods / design All patients medically fit for surgery and deemed suitable for a resurfacing arthroplasty are eligible to take part in this study . A r and omisation sequence will be produced and administered independently . After consenting , all patients will be clinical ly review ed and hip function , quality of life and physical activity level will be assessed through question naires . The allocated surgery will then be performed with the preferred technique of the surgeon . Six weeks post-operation hip function will be assessed and complications recorded . Three , six and 12 months post-operation hip function , quality of life and physical activity level will be assessed . Additional information about patients ' out-of-pocket expenses will also be collected . Trial registration Current Controlled Trials IS RCT N33354155UKCLRN portfolio ID
Patients experienced significant post-THR improvements in Harris Hip scores , but this did not differ between impact types .
Recipients of cross-linked vs. conventional polyethylene cup liners experienced reduced femoral head penetration and revision .
There was no impact of femoral stem fixation and cup shell design on implant survival rates .
Evidence on mortality and complications ( aseptic loosening , femoral fracture ) was inconclusive .
BACKGROUND Evolvements in the design , fixation methods , size , and bearing surface of implants for  total hip replacement ( THR ) have led to a variety of options for healthcare professionals to consider .
The need to determine the most optimal combinations of THR implant is warranted .
This systematic review evaluated the clinical effectiveness of different types of THR used for the treatment of end stage arthritis of the hip .