Due to a paucity of studies , and the heterogeneity of the studies included in this review , we are unable to draw conclusions regarding the effectiveness of nutritional interventions for use with childhood cancer survivors .
Although there is low quality evidence for the improvement in health behaviours using health behaviour change interventions , there remains no evidence as to whether this translates into an improvement in dietary intake .
There was also no evidence that the studies reduced the risk of cardiovascular and metabolic disorders in childhood cancer survivors , although no evidence of effect is not the same as evidence of no effect .
BACKGROUND Childhood cancer survivors are at a higher risk of developing health conditions such as osteoporosis , and cardiovascular disease than their peers .
Health-promoting behaviour , such as consuming a healthy diet , could lessen the impact of these chronic issues , yet the prevalence rate of health-protecting behaviour amongst survivors of childhood cancer is similar to that of the general population .
Targeted nutritional interventions may prevent or reduce the incidence of these chronic diseases .
OBJECTIVES The primary aim of this review was to assess the efficacy of a range of nutritional interventions design ed to improve the nutritional intake of childhood cancer survivors , as compared to a control group of childhood cancer survivors who did not receive the intervention .
Multi-component behavioral intervention to promote health protective behaviors in childhood cancer survivors: the protect study.
BACKGROUND Improved cure rates for childhood cancer have produced a growing population of survivors at risk for late toxicities of chemotherapy and radiation therapy . Healthy behaviors can modify these risks . We initiated a controlled prospect i ve trial to determine if a multi-component behavioral intervention could induce change in childhood cancer survivors ' health knowledge , health perceptions , and practice of health-protective behaviors . PROCEDURE Adolescent cancer survivors attending a long-term follow-up clinic were r and omized to receive st and ard follow-up care or st and ard care plus the educational intervention . Baseline measures were obtained at r and omization ( T(0 ) ) and repeated 1 year ( T(1 ) ) later during the survivors ' annual check-up . RESULTS Of 272 patients enrolled and r and omized , 251 are evaluable at both time points . Treatment and control groups were similar in regards to diagnosis , gender , race , and age . The change in outcome measures over the year ( T(1)-T(0 ) ) was not significantly different between the two groups as assessed by a two- sample pooled t test . However , additional exploratory analyses indicated a significant gender difference in knowledge with female survivors in the intervention group having higher scores . In addition , patients who choose certain individual health goals , such as breast/testicular self-examination , showed improved practice of the health behavior . In addition , in a very exploratory analysis , a gender difference in response to the intervention was noted , with females exhibiting a greater improvement in knowledge scores than did males . CONCLUSIONS Although the multi-behavioral educational intervention did not induce change in health knowledge , perceptions , and behaviors of childhood cancer survivors for the treatment group as a whole , gender differences and specific health goal differences were found . These findings suggest that future interventions should be tailored to reflect gender differences and the nature of the health goal under assessment
Due to a paucity of studies , and the heterogeneity of the studies included in this review , we are unable to draw conclusions regarding the effectiveness of nutritional interventions for use with childhood cancer survivors .
Although there is low quality evidence for the improvement in health behaviours using health behaviour change interventions , there remains no evidence as to whether this translates into an improvement in dietary intake .
There was also no evidence that the studies reduced the risk of cardiovascular and metabolic disorders in childhood cancer survivors , although no evidence of effect is not the same as evidence of no effect .
BACKGROUND Childhood cancer survivors are at a higher risk of developing health conditions such as osteoporosis , and cardiovascular disease than their peers .
Health-promoting behaviour , such as consuming a healthy diet , could lessen the impact of these chronic issues , yet the prevalence rate of health-protecting behaviour amongst survivors of childhood cancer is similar to that of the general population .
Targeted nutritional interventions may prevent or reduce the incidence of these chronic diseases .
OBJECTIVES The primary aim of this review was to assess the efficacy of a range of nutritional interventions design ed to improve the nutritional intake of childhood cancer survivors , as compared to a control group of childhood cancer survivors who did not receive the intervention .