Current data confirm that the 6MWT , ISWT and ESWT are valid , reliable and responsive to change with some interventions .
However , results are sensitive to small changes in methodology .
Field walking tests are commonly employed to evaluate exercise capacity , assess prognosis and evaluate treatment response in chronic respiratory diseases .
In recent years , there has been a wealth of new literature pertinent to the conduct of the 6-min walk test ( 6MWT ) , and a growing evidence base describing the incremental and endurance shuttle walk tests ( ISWT and ESWT , respectively ) .
The aim of this document is to describe the st and ard operating procedures for the 6MWT , ISWT and ESWT , which can be consistently employed by clinicians and research ers .
The endurance shuttle walk test: An alternative to the six-minute walk test for the assessment of ambulatory oxygen
UK guidelines for domiciliary oxygen have suggested the six-minute walk test or shuttle walk tests as suitable functional measures for the clinical assessment of ambulatory oxygen ( AO ) . To date , there is limited evidence that would support the use of shuttle walk tests as assessment tools for AO . The endurance shuttle walk test ( ESWT ) is used increasingly as an assessment tool within pulmonary rehabilitation ( PR ) but its potential as an investigative test for AO has not been explored . Using the same test for both PR and AO assessment is appealing since it would improve efficiency and act to st and ardise outcome measures in this patient population . The aim of this study was to examine the responsiveness and repeatability of the ESWT to AO and to compare the response with that of the six-minute walk test ( 6MWT ) .  Twenty-three patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ( COPD ) performed , in r and om order , the ESWT and the 6MWT on air and whilst breathing AO . Oxygen saturation and Borg ratings of breathlessness and perceived exertion were recorded . On a third day , eleven patients repeated the ESWT with AO in order to measure repeatability . There was a significantly greater change in the ESWT with oxygen than the change recorded from the 6MWT ( 66 [ 91 ] vs 6 [ 28 ] m respectively ; P < .05 ) . When repeated on a separate day , the mean difference ( 95 % CI ) between distances walked on the ESWT with AO was 0.91 ( -47 , 49 ) m. The ESWT was more responsive than the 6MWT for detecting improvements in walking endurance whilst breathing AO
Current data confirm that the 6MWT , ISWT and ESWT are valid , reliable and responsive to change with some interventions .
However , results are sensitive to small changes in methodology .
Field walking tests are commonly employed to evaluate exercise capacity , assess prognosis and evaluate treatment response in chronic respiratory diseases .
In recent years , there has been a wealth of new literature pertinent to the conduct of the 6-min walk test ( 6MWT ) , and a growing evidence base describing the incremental and endurance shuttle walk tests ( ISWT and ESWT , respectively ) .
The aim of this document is to describe the st and ard operating procedures for the 6MWT , ISWT and ESWT , which can be consistently employed by clinicians and research ers .