Telemedicine had no convincing effect on quality of life , mortality or hypoglycemia .
INTERPRETATION : Compared with usual care , the addition of telemedicine , especially systems that allowed medication adjustments with or without text messaging or a Web portal , improved HbA1C but not other clinical ly relevant outcomes among patients with diabetes
BACKGROUND : Telemedicine , the use of telecommunications to deliver health services , expertise and information , is a promising but unproven tool for improving the quality of  diabetes care  .
We summarized the effectiveness of different methods of telemedicine for the management of diabetes compared with usual care .
Diabetes Interactive Diary: A New Telemedicine System Enabling Flexible Diet and Insulin Therapy While Improving Quality of Life
OBJECTIVE Widespread use of carbohydrate counting is limited by its complex education . In this study we compared a Diabetes Interactive Diary ( DID ) with st and ard carbohydrate counting in terms of metabolic and weight control , time required for education , quality of life , and treatment satisfaction . RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Adults with type 1 diabetes were r and omly assigned to DID ( group A , n = 67 ) or st and ard education ( group B , n = 63 ) and followed for 6 months . A subgroup also completed the  SF-36 Health Survey ( SF-36 ) and World Health Organization-Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Question naire ( WHO-DTSQ ) at each visit . RESULTS Of 130 patients ( aged 35.7 ± 9.4 years ; diabetes duration 16.5 ± 10.5 years ) , 11 dropped out .  Time for education was 6 h ( range 2–15 h ) in group A and 12 h ( 2.5–25 h ) in group B ( P = 0.07 ) . A1C reduction was similar in both groups ( group A from 8.2 ± 0.8 to 7.8 ± 0.8 % and group B from 8.4 ± 0.7 to 7.9 ± 1.1 % ; P = 0.68 ) . Nonsignificant differences in favor of group A were documented for fasting blood glucose and body weight . No severe hypoglycemic episode occurred . WHO-DTSQ scores increased significantly more in group A ( from 26.7 ± 4.4 to 30.3 ± 4.5 ) than in group B ( from 27.5 ± 4.8 to 28.6 ± 5.1 ) ( P = 0.04 ) . Role Physical , General Health , Vitality , and Role Emotional SF-36 scores improved significantly more in group A than in group B. CONCLUSIONS DID is at least as effective as traditional carbohydrate counting education , allowing dietary freedom for a larger proportion of type 1 diabetic patients . DID is safe , requires less time for education , and is associated with lower weight gain . DID significantly improved treatment satisfaction and several quality -of-life dimensions
Telemedicine had no convincing effect on quality of life , mortality or hypoglycemia .
INTERPRETATION : Compared with usual care , the addition of telemedicine , especially systems that allowed medication adjustments with or without text messaging or a Web portal , improved HbA1C but not other clinical ly relevant outcomes among patients with diabetes
BACKGROUND : Telemedicine , the use of telecommunications to deliver health services , expertise and information , is a promising but unproven tool for improving the quality of  diabetes care  .
We summarized the effectiveness of different methods of telemedicine for the management of diabetes compared with usual care .