SET was still beneficial for maximal and pain-free walking distances at 12 months , but it did not have a significant effect on quality of life parameters .
AUTHORS ' CONCLUSIONS SET has statistically significant benefit on treadmill walking distance ( maximal and pain-free ) compared with non-supervised regimens .
BACKGROUND Although supervised exercise therapy is considered to be of significant benefit for people with leg pain ( peripheral arterial disease ( PAD ) ) , implementing supervised exercise programs ( SETs ) in daily practice has limitations .
This is an up date of a review first published in 2006 .
OBJECTIVES The main objective of this review was to provide an accurate overview of studies evaluating the effects of supervised versus non-supervised exercise therapy on maximal walking time or distance on a treadmill for people with intermittent claudication .
Efficacy of Quantified Home-Based Exercise and Supervised Exercise in Patients With Intermittent Claudication: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Background — This prospect i ve , r and omized , controlled clinical trial compared changes in exercise performance and daily ambulatory activity in peripheral artery disease patients with intermittent claudication after a home-based exercise program , a supervised exercise program , and usual-care control . Methods and Results — Of the 119 patients r and omized , 29 completed home-based exercise  , 33 completed  supervised exercise , and 30 completed usual-care control . Both exercise programs consisted of intermittent walking to nearly maximal claudication pain for 12 weeks . Patients wore a step activity monitor during each exercise session . Primary outcome measures included claudication onset time and peak walking time obtained from a treadmill exercise test ; secondary outcome measures included daily ambulatory cadences measured during a 7-day monitoring period . Adherence to home-based and supervised exercise was similar ( P=0.712 ) and exceeded 80 % . Both exercise programs increased claudication onset time ( P<0.001 ) and peak walking time ( P<0.01 ) , whereas only home-based exercise increased daily average cadence ( P<0.01 ) . No changes were seen in the control group ( P>0.05 ) . The changes in claudication onset time and peak walking time were similar between the 2 exercise groups ( P>0.05 ) , whereas the change in daily average cadence was greater with home-based exercise ( P<0.05 ) . Conclusions — A home-based exercise program , quantified with a step activity monitor , has high adherence and is efficacious in improving claudication measures similar to a st and ard supervised exercise program . Furthermore , home-based exercise appears more efficacious in increasing daily ambulatory activity in the community setting than supervised exercise . Clinical Trial Registration — URL : http://www . Clinical Trials . Gov . Unique identifier : NCT00618670
SET was still beneficial for maximal and pain-free walking distances at 12 months , but it did not have a significant effect on quality of life parameters .
AUTHORS ' CONCLUSIONS SET has statistically significant benefit on treadmill walking distance ( maximal and pain-free ) compared with non-supervised regimens .
BACKGROUND Although supervised exercise therapy is considered to be of significant benefit for people with leg pain ( peripheral arterial disease ( PAD ) ) , implementing supervised exercise programs ( SETs ) in daily practice has limitations .
This is an up date of a review first published in 2006 .
OBJECTIVES The main objective of this review was to provide an accurate overview of studies evaluating the effects of supervised versus non-supervised exercise therapy on maximal walking time or distance on a treadmill for people with intermittent claudication .