Meta-analyses showed no clinical ly relevant differences in terms of revision rates , clinical outcome scores or patient-reported outcome measures between MB and FB TKRs .
It appears that theoretical assumptions of superiority of MB over FB TKR are not borne out in clinical practice
Mobile-bearing ( MB ) total knee replacement ( TKR ) was introduced to reduce the risk of aseptic loosening and wear of polyethylene inserts .
However , no consistent clinical advantages of mobile- over fixed-bearing ( FB ) TKR have been found .
In this study we evaluated whether mobile bearings have an advantage over fixed bearings with regard to revision rates and clinical outcome scores .
Furthermore , we determined which modifying variables affected the outcome .
Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee.
Within the context of a double blind r and omized controlled parallel trial of 2 nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs , we vali date d WOMAC , a new multidimensional , self-administered health status instrument for patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee . The pain , stiffness and physical function subscales fulfil conventional criteria for face , content and construct validity , reliability , responsiveness and relative efficiency . WOMAC is a disease-specific purpose built high performance instrument for evaluative research in osteoarthritis clinical trials
Meta-analyses showed no clinical ly relevant differences in terms of revision rates , clinical outcome scores or patient-reported outcome measures between MB and FB TKRs .
It appears that theoretical assumptions of superiority of MB over FB TKR are not borne out in clinical practice
Mobile-bearing ( MB ) total knee replacement ( TKR ) was introduced to reduce the risk of aseptic loosening and wear of polyethylene inserts .
However , no consistent clinical advantages of mobile- over fixed-bearing ( FB ) TKR have been found .
In this study we evaluated whether mobile bearings have an advantage over fixed bearings with regard to revision rates and clinical outcome scores .
Furthermore , we determined which modifying variables affected the outcome .