Mirtazapine was significantly more effective than a serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor ( venlafaxine only , two trials , n = 415 ) at two weeks ( OR 2.29 , 95 % CI 1.45 to 3.59 ) and at the end of acute-phase treatment ( OR 1.53 , 95 % CI 1.03 to 2.25).In terms of dropouts , there was no robust evidence to detect a difference between mirtazapine and other antidepressants .
Mirtazapine was more likely to cause weight gain or increased appetite and somnolence than SSRIs but less likely to cause nausea or vomiting and sexual dysfunction .
AUTHORS ' CONCLUSIONS Some statistically significant and possibly clinical ly meaningful differences between mirtazapine and other antidepressive agents were found for the acute-phase treatment of major depression .
Mirtazapine is likely to have a faster onset of action than SSRIs during the acute-phase treatment .
Dropouts occur similarly in participants treated with mirtazapine and those treated with other antidepressants , although the adverse event profile of mirtazapine is unique
BACKGROUND Mirtazapine has a unique mechanism of antidepressive action and is one of the commonly used antidepressants in clinical practice .
OBJECTIVES The aim of the present review was to assess the evidence on the efficacy and acceptability of mirtazapine compared with other antidepressive agents in the acute-phase treatment of major depression in adults .
A double-blind comparison of sertraline and fluoxetine in the treatment of major depressive episode in outpatients.
Depression is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality . As depressive disorders carry a high risk of relapse , treatment strategies include the use of a 6-month continuation period after resolution of the acute episode . Tolerability is of major importance when determining compliance and outcome during long-term therapy . Due to the superior tolerability profile of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors ( SSRIs ) over the older tricyclic antidepressants ( TCAs ) , the former may be more suitable for extended therapy . Comparative studies have not shown differences between the SSRIs in terms of efficacy , but side-effect profiles may vary . A multicenter , double-blind , comparative study of sertraline and fluoxetine was carried out in out patients fulfilling DSM-III-R criteria for major depressive disorder . Patients were r and omised to receive sertraline ( 50 - 150 mg , n = 118 ) or fluoxetine ( 20 - 60 mg , n = 120 ) for 24 weeks . Assessment s for depression ( HAM-D , HAD , CGI-I , CGI-S ) , anxiety ( Covi ) , sleep ( Leeds Sleep Evaluation scale ) and quality of life ( SIP ) were made at study entry and at weeks 2 , 4 , 8 , 12 , 18 and 24 . All adverse events were recorded to allow evaluation of tolerability . In total , 88 patients in the sertraline group completed the study compared with 79 in the fluoxetine group .  Side effects were responsible for the premature treatment withdrawal of seven ( 6 % ) sertraline patients and 12 ( 10 % ) fluoxetine patients . Two-hundred and thirty-four patients were included in an ITT analysis up to last visit ( 116 sertraline , 118 fluoxetine ) . At study endpoint , both treatments produced a significant improvement over baseline on all efficacy variables ( P < 0.001 ) . Although the magnitude of global changes in depression , anxiety , and quality of life was larger with sertraline than fluoxetine , none of the between-group differences reached statistical significance . However , significant differences in favour of sertraline were observed for individual HAM-D items including item 4 ( insomnia onset ) ( P = 0.04 ) , item 9 ( agitation ) ( P = 0.02 ) , and item 13 ( general somatic symptoms ) ( P = 0.008 ) . In addition , sertraline was associated with significantly superior performance on the Leeds Sleep Evaluation scale and on SIP items relating to sleep and rest , emotional behaviour and ambulation . Both sertraline and fluoxetine were well tolerated with no significant differences between treatments
Mirtazapine was significantly more effective than a serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor ( venlafaxine only , two trials , n = 415 ) at two weeks ( OR 2.29 , 95 % CI 1.45 to 3.59 ) and at the end of acute-phase treatment ( OR 1.53 , 95 % CI 1.03 to 2.25).In terms of dropouts , there was no robust evidence to detect a difference between mirtazapine and other antidepressants .
Mirtazapine was more likely to cause weight gain or increased appetite and somnolence than SSRIs but less likely to cause nausea or vomiting and sexual dysfunction .
AUTHORS ' CONCLUSIONS Some statistically significant and possibly clinical ly meaningful differences between mirtazapine and other antidepressive agents were found for the acute-phase treatment of major depression .
Mirtazapine is likely to have a faster onset of action than SSRIs during the acute-phase treatment .
Dropouts occur similarly in participants treated with mirtazapine and those treated with other antidepressants , although the adverse event profile of mirtazapine is unique
BACKGROUND Mirtazapine has a unique mechanism of antidepressive action and is one of the commonly used antidepressants in clinical practice .
OBJECTIVES The aim of the present review was to assess the evidence on the efficacy and acceptability of mirtazapine compared with other antidepressive agents in the acute-phase treatment of major depression in adults .