RESULTS Application of the Oral Health Impact Profile ( OHIP ) demonstrated that disease of pulpal origin affects quality of life with moderate severity , primarily through physical pain and psychological discomfort , and that RCT results in broad improvement of quality of life .
Satisfaction with RCT is extremely high , but cost is the primary reason for dissatisfaction .
Anxiety and fear affect RCT patients , profoundly influencing their behaviors , including treatment avoidance , and their pain experience .
Fear of pain is " fair " to " very much " prior to RCT .
Pain is widely feared , disliked , and remembered ; however , disease of pulpal origin generally produces moderate , but not severe pain .
RCT causes a dramatic decrease in pain prevalence and severity over the week following treatment .
Survival rates of teeth after RCT are very high ; complication rates are low .
Cost is a barrier to RCT , but initial costs , lifetime costs , cost effectiveness , cost utility , and cost benefit all compare extremely well to the alternatives involving replacement using implants or fixed prostheses .
INTRODUCTION Root canal treatment ( RCT ) success criteria inform us of the path to bony healing and of prognostic factors , but tell little about how the patient perceives , feels , or values RCT .
Patients choose , undergo , and pay for RCT , they live with the result , and inform their community .
The purpose of this narrative review was to appraise patient-centered outcomes of initial non-surgical RCT and nonsurgical retreatment , in adults .
Quality of life of endodontically treated versus implant treated patients: a University-based qualitative research study.
INTRODUCTION Up-to- date studies comparing endodontic treatment versus implant-supported prosthesis have shown similar clinical outcome and survival rates . However , no data are available comparing both treatment modalities based on the patient 's perception of quality of life . This study was design ed to qualitatively describe and compare the quality of life of patients with restored , single endodontically treated teeth versus patients with single implant-supported fixed prostheses . METHODS Forty-eight patients agreed to participate in the study ( n = 24 from each treatment modality ) . Of those , 37 actually participated in the study : 17 were endodontically treated and 20 had an implant-supported prosthesis . Patients in each of the two groups were r and omly selected from the Graduate Endodontics and Graduate Periodontics Departments , respectively . Six focus group discussion s ( n = 3 per treatment group ) were held and audio-recorded for subsequent thematic analysis . Data were analyzed to identify common themes within each category and compared to assess any differences in quality of life between the two treatments . Additionally , a quality of life survey , the shortened version of the Oral Health Impact Profile ( OHIP-14 ) , was given before the discussion group and the responses analyzed . RESULTS The results obtained from this study show similar overall OHIP scores and show a high rate of satisfaction with both treatment modalities . Content analysis of the discussion groups revealed several themes and subthemes . The major themes were importance of overall health , financial implication s of the treatments , perception of the treatments and its outcomes , time since treatment , and follow-up dental visits . CONCLUSIONS The results help identify patients ' perception and concerns with each treatment modality and assist the clinician and patient in the selection of an optimal treatment for their given situation . In addition to the prognosis and outcomes , clinicians should consider patients ' perceptions and preferences as well as the influence each therapy may have on their quality of life , both short- and long-term . Overall , all the participants in this study were pleased with the treatment received and expressed a clear message to save their natural dentition whenever possible
RESULTS Application of the Oral Health Impact Profile ( OHIP ) demonstrated that disease of pulpal origin affects quality of life with moderate severity , primarily through physical pain and psychological discomfort , and that RCT results in broad improvement of quality of life .
Satisfaction with RCT is extremely high , but cost is the primary reason for dissatisfaction .
Anxiety and fear affect RCT patients , profoundly influencing their behaviors , including treatment avoidance , and their pain experience .
Fear of pain is " fair " to " very much " prior to RCT .
Pain is widely feared , disliked , and remembered ; however , disease of pulpal origin generally produces moderate , but not severe pain .
RCT causes a dramatic decrease in pain prevalence and severity over the week following treatment .
Survival rates of teeth after RCT are very high ; complication rates are low .
Cost is a barrier to RCT , but initial costs , lifetime costs , cost effectiveness , cost utility , and cost benefit all compare extremely well to the alternatives involving replacement using implants or fixed prostheses .
INTRODUCTION Root canal treatment ( RCT ) success criteria inform us of the path to bony healing and of prognostic factors , but tell little about how the patient perceives , feels , or values RCT .
Patients choose , undergo , and pay for RCT , they live with the result , and inform their community .
The purpose of this narrative review was to appraise patient-centered outcomes of initial non-surgical RCT and nonsurgical retreatment , in adults .