D. Restoration of sinus rhythm for monophasic vs. biphasic waveforms .
Another study showed that PVI result ed in long-term restoration
Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is a major public health problem in the United States .
More than 2.3 million Americans are estimated to have AF ( 1 ) .
The known association between AF and substantial mortality , morbidity , and health care costs compounds the effect of this condition .
Not only is the risk for death in patients with AF twice that of patients without it , but AF can result in myocardial ischemia and infa rct ion , exacerbate heart failure ( HF ) , and cause tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy if the ventricular rate is not well-controlled ( 25 ) .
The most dreaded complication of AF is thromboembolism , especially stroke ( 6 ) .
In some patients , AF or therapies to manage this condition can severely depreciate quality of life ( 710 ) .
Furthermore , the management of AF and its complications is responsible for nearly $ 16 billion in additional costs to the U.S. health care system per year ( 11 ) .
We conducted this systematic review to evaluate the comparative safety and effectiveness of rate- versus rhythm-control strategies ;  medications used for ventricular rate control ; strict versus more lenient rate-control strategies ; nonpharmacologic rate-control therapies  versus medications ; electrical cardioversion and antiarrhythmic medications  for restoration of sinus rhythm ;  and  catheter ablation , surgical ablation , and antiarrhythmic medications  for maintenance of sinus rhythm .
Rapid loading of sotalol or amiodarone for management of recent onset symptomatic atrial fibrillation: a randomized, digoxin-controlled trial.
BACKGROUND Amiodarone and sotalol are commonly used for the maintenance of sinus rhythm , but the efficacy of these agents administered as high-dose infusions for rapid conversion of atrial fibrillation is unknown . Use in this context would facilitate drug initiation in patients in whom ongoing prophylactic therapy is indicated . METHODS We assessed the efficacy and safety of rapid high-dose intravenous infusions of amiodarone and sotalol for heart rate control and rapid reversion to sinus rhythm in patients who came to the emergency department with recent-onset symptomatic atrial fibrillation . Patients ( n = 140 ) were r and omized to receive 1.5mg/kg of sotalol infused in 10 minutes , 10mg/kg of amiodarone in 30 minutes , or 500 microg of digoxin in 20 minutes . Electrical cardioversion was attempted for patients not converting to sinus rhythm within 12 hours . RESULTS The rapid infusion of sotalol or amiodarone result ed in more rapid rate control than digoxin . Each of the 3 trial strategies result ed in similar rates of pharmacological conversion to sinus rhythm  ( amiodarone , 51 % ; sotalol , 44 % ; digoxin , 50 % ; P = not significant ) . The overall rates of cardioversion after trial drug infusion and defibrillation were high for all groups ( amiodarone , 94 % ; sotalol , 95 % , ; digoxin , 98 % ; P = not significant ) , but there was a trend toward a higher incidence of serious adverse reactions in the amiodarone group . CONCLUSION The rapid infusion of sotalol or amiodarone in patients with symptomatic recent-onset atrial fibrillation results in rapid control of ventricular rate . Even with high-dose rapid infusions , all 3 agents are associated with a poor overall reversion rate within 12 hours . Almost all patients were returned to sinus rhythm with a combination of pharmacological therapy and electrical cardioversion
D. Restoration of sinus rhythm for monophasic vs. biphasic waveforms .
Another study showed that PVI result ed in long-term restoration
Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is a major public health problem in the United States .
More than 2.3 million Americans are estimated to have AF ( 1 ) .
The known association between AF and substantial mortality , morbidity , and health care costs compounds the effect of this condition .
Not only is the risk for death in patients with AF twice that of patients without it , but AF can result in myocardial ischemia and infa rct ion , exacerbate heart failure ( HF ) , and cause tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy if the ventricular rate is not well-controlled ( 25 ) .
The most dreaded complication of AF is thromboembolism , especially stroke ( 6 ) .
In some patients , AF or therapies to manage this condition can severely depreciate quality of life ( 710 ) .
Furthermore , the management of AF and its complications is responsible for nearly $ 16 billion in additional costs to the U.S. health care system per year ( 11 ) .
We conducted this systematic review to evaluate the comparative safety and effectiveness of rate- versus rhythm-control strategies ;  medications used for ventricular rate control ; strict versus more lenient rate-control strategies ; nonpharmacologic rate-control therapies  versus medications ; electrical cardioversion and antiarrhythmic medications  for restoration of sinus rhythm ;  and  catheter ablation , surgical ablation , and antiarrhythmic medications  for maintenance of sinus rhythm .