Small effect sizes and potentially transient effect were reported in some studies , and some review ers noted that durability of intervention impact was potentially sensitive to duration of intervention and adherence to behaviour change .
Behaviour change , vascular disease and mortality outcome data were infrequently reported , and evidence of the impact of intervention on these outcomes was minimal .
Relatively long- duration lifestyle interventions can limit or delay progression to diabetes under trial conditions .
However , outcomes from more time-limited interventions , and those applied in routine clinical setting s , appear more variable , in keeping with the findings of recent pragmatic trials .
There is little evidence of intervention impact on vascular outcomes or mortality end points in any context . '
Real-world ' implementation of lifestyle interventions for diabetes prevention may be expected to lead to modest outcomes
OBJECTIVES To review the clinical outcomes of combined diet and physical activity interventions for population s at high risk of type 2 diabetes .
A community based primary prevention programme for type 2 diabetes integrating identification and lifestyle intervention for prevention: the Let's Prevent Diabetes cluster randomised controlled trial.
OBJECTIVES Prevention of type 2 diabetes ( T2DM ) is a priority in healthcare , but there is a lack of evidence investigating how to effectively translate prevention research into a UK primary care setting . We assessed whether a structured education programme targeting lifestyle and behaviour change was effective at preventing progression to T2DM  in people with pre-diabetes . MATERIAL S AND METHODS Forty-four general practice s were r and omised to receive either st and ard care or a 6hour group structured education programme with an annual refresher course , and regular phone contact . Participants were followed up for 3years . The primary outcome was progression to T2DM . RESULTS Eight hundred and eighty participants were included ( 36 % female , mean age 64years , 16 % ethnic minority group ) ; 131 participants developed T2DM . There was a non-significant 26 % reduced risk of developing T2DM in the intervention arm compared to st and ard care ( HR 0.74 , 95 % CI 0.48 , 1.14 , p=0.18 ) . The reduction in T2DM risk when excluding those who did not attend the initial education session was also non-significant ( HR 0.65 , 0.41 , 1.03 , p=0.07 ) . There were statistically significant improvements in HbA1c ( -0.06 , -0.11 , -0.01 ) , LDL cholesterol ( -0.08 , -0.15 , -0.01 ) , sedentary time ( -26.29 , -45.26 , -7.32 ) and step count ( 498.15 , 162.10 , 834.20 ) when data were analysed across all time points . CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that a relatively low re source , pragmatic diabetes prevention programme result ed in modest benefits to biomedical , lifestyle and psychosocial outcomes , however the reduction to the risk of T2DM did not reach significance . The findings have important implication s for future research and primary care
Small effect sizes and potentially transient effect were reported in some studies , and some review ers noted that durability of intervention impact was potentially sensitive to duration of intervention and adherence to behaviour change .
Behaviour change , vascular disease and mortality outcome data were infrequently reported , and evidence of the impact of intervention on these outcomes was minimal .
Relatively long- duration lifestyle interventions can limit or delay progression to diabetes under trial conditions .
However , outcomes from more time-limited interventions , and those applied in routine clinical setting s , appear more variable , in keeping with the findings of recent pragmatic trials .
There is little evidence of intervention impact on vascular outcomes or mortality end points in any context . '
Real-world ' implementation of lifestyle interventions for diabetes prevention may be expected to lead to modest outcomes
OBJECTIVES To review the clinical outcomes of combined diet and physical activity interventions for population s at high risk of type 2 diabetes .