Other outcome parameters were unsuitable for meta- analysis , but seemed to favour ERAS .
Analysis shows a reduction in overall complications , but major complications were not reduced .
Length of stay was reduced significantly .
We state that ERAS seems safe , but the quality of trials and lack of sufficient other outcome parameters do not justify implementation of ERAS as the st and ard of care .
Within ERAS protocol s included , no answer regarding the role for minimally invasive surgery ( i.e. laparoscopy ) was found .
BACKGROUND In recent years the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery ( ERAS ) postoperative pathway in (ileo-)colorectal surgery , aim ing at improving perioperative care and decreasing postoperative complications , has become more common .
OBJECTIVES We investigated the effectiveness and safety of the ERAS multimodal strategy , compared to conventional care after (ileo-)colorectal surgery .
The primary research question was whether ERAS protocol s lead to less morbidity and secondary whether length of stay was reduced .
Randomized clinical trial to compare the length of hospital stay and morbidity for early feeding with opioid-sparing analgesia versus traditional care after open appendectomy.
BACKGROUND & AIMS Fast track protocol s have been successfully used in abdominal surgery but there are no r and omized trials on fast track after appendectomy . The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of fast track perioperative care protocol including early feeding with opioid-sparing analgesia after open appendectomy . METHODS We r and omly allocated 62 consecutive patients who underwent appendectomy to an early feeding with opioid-sparing analgesia and traditional care group .  The study was not blinded regarding the mode of postoperative rehabilitation . Clinical primary endpoint was length of postoperative hospital stay . Secondary endpoints were morbidity rate , time to bowel sounds and passage of flatus or stools , tolerance of solid diet and facial visual pain score . RESULTS The mean length of primary hospital stay was significantly shorter in the early feeding with opioid-sparing analgesia than in traditional care group ( 2.2 versus 4.0 days , P<0.001 ) . No significant differences were seen between groups regarding demographics , degree of pathological changes in the appendix , and in the secondary endpoints such as morbidity , frequency of vomiting , visual facial pain score , time to first flatus or stools , resumption of bowel sounds and toleration of solid diet . CONCLUSIONS This study indicates that early feeding and opioid-sparing analgesia after open appendectomy is safe and reduces length of hospital stay without deterioration of pain control
Other outcome parameters were unsuitable for meta- analysis , but seemed to favour ERAS .
Analysis shows a reduction in overall complications , but major complications were not reduced .
Length of stay was reduced significantly .
We state that ERAS seems safe , but the quality of trials and lack of sufficient other outcome parameters do not justify implementation of ERAS as the st and ard of care .
Within ERAS protocol s included , no answer regarding the role for minimally invasive surgery ( i.e. laparoscopy ) was found .
BACKGROUND In recent years the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery ( ERAS ) postoperative pathway in (ileo-)colorectal surgery , aim ing at improving perioperative care and decreasing postoperative complications , has become more common .
OBJECTIVES We investigated the effectiveness and safety of the ERAS multimodal strategy , compared to conventional care after (ileo-)colorectal surgery .
The primary research question was whether ERAS protocol s lead to less morbidity and secondary whether length of stay was reduced .