RECENT FINDINGS Several r and omized control trials and systematic review s demonstrate the safety and efficacy of atrial fibrillation ablation in patients with heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction .
In multiple trials , these patients have shown clinical benefit from atrial fibrillation ablation including improved left ventricular systolic function , quality of life , and clinical heart failure symptoms .
SUMMARY Atrial fibrillation ablation in heart failure patients remains well tolerated with an overall efficacy comparable to atrial fibrillation ablation in patients without heart failure .
There is consistent evidence for the clinical benefit of atrial fibrillation ablation in heart failure patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction and limited evidence for atrial fibrillation ablation in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction .
Currently , there is insufficient data regarding the safety and efficacy of left atrial appendage closure devices in heart failure patients
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure experience an increased morbidity and mortality from the hemodynamic consequences of atrial fibrillation and an increased stroke risk .
Consequently , there has been increased attention to procedural alternatives to pharmacologic rhythm control and anticoagulation for stroke prevention .
This review aims to evaluate the evidence for atrial fibrillation ablation and left atrial appendage closure in heart failure patients .
Ablation vs medical therapy in the setting of symptomatic atrial fibrillation and left ventricular dysfunction.
Small , single-center studies suggest that catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation ( AF )  can improve ventricular function and reduce symptoms in patients with left ventricular ( LV ) dysfunction . However , ablation has not been compared with a pharmacologic strategy for AF . The authors evaluated patients with AF and symptomatic LV dysfunction ( ejection fraction < or = 45 % ) referred for pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) . They compared these patients with a matched cohort treated medically for AF and LV dysfunction via a retrospective case-control method . Fifteen patients ( 14 men , 56+/-11 years , 10 [ 67 % ] paroxysmal AF ) with AF for 4+/-3 years underwent PVI .  Baseline ejection fraction was 37%+/-6 % and New York Heart Association ( NYHA ) class was 2.0+/-1.0 . Fifteen controls ( 13 men , 63+/-14 years , 11 [ 73 % ] paroxysmal AF ) with AF for 5+/-4 years were treated medically for AF . Baseline ejection fraction was 34%+/-11 % and NYHA class was 2.0+/-0.7 . The groups were similar in all respects . During a follow-up of 16+/-13 months after complete PVI , ejection fraction improved ( P=.001 ) to 50%+/-13 % and normalized in 8 patients ( 53 % ) . NYHA class improved to 1.3+/-0.5 ( P=.01 ) . In the medically treated group , after follow-up of 16+/-12 months , no improvement in ejection fraction ( 36%+/-12 % ) or NYHA class ( 1.8+/-0.7 ) was seen . Compared with pharmacologic therapy , PVI significantly improved LV function and NYHA class in patients with AF and symptomatic LV dysfunction . These provocative findings provide potent rationale for a r and omized clinical trial comparing ablation with pharmacologic therapy
RECENT FINDINGS Several r and omized control trials and systematic review s demonstrate the safety and efficacy of atrial fibrillation ablation in patients with heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction .
In multiple trials , these patients have shown clinical benefit from atrial fibrillation ablation including improved left ventricular systolic function , quality of life , and clinical heart failure symptoms .
SUMMARY Atrial fibrillation ablation in heart failure patients remains well tolerated with an overall efficacy comparable to atrial fibrillation ablation in patients without heart failure .
There is consistent evidence for the clinical benefit of atrial fibrillation ablation in heart failure patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction and limited evidence for atrial fibrillation ablation in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction .
Currently , there is insufficient data regarding the safety and efficacy of left atrial appendage closure devices in heart failure patients
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure experience an increased morbidity and mortality from the hemodynamic consequences of atrial fibrillation and an increased stroke risk .
Consequently , there has been increased attention to procedural alternatives to pharmacologic rhythm control and anticoagulation for stroke prevention .
This review aims to evaluate the evidence for atrial fibrillation ablation and left atrial appendage closure in heart failure patients .