The  Childhood Health Assessment Question naire ( C-HAQ )  was the most extensively studied instrument and had high reliability , but only moderate correlations with other indices of disease activity and poor responsiveness to change in disease status .
The physician global assessment of disease activity ( PGA ) and articular indices had the strongest association with disease activity and were the most responsive to change .
Measures of psychosocial function and quality of life were moderately associated with measures of disease activity , but were less responsive to changes in disease status .
In children with JIA , no single instrument was superior in reliability or validity or in describing the impact of JIA .
Although the C-HAQ has been extensively evaluated , the PGA and articular indices appear to have the highest responsiveness to change and , therefore , the highest potential for detecting important differences in treatment response
OBJECTIVE To review the performance characteristics of the instruments most commonly used to measure clinical outcomes in juvenile idiopathic arthritis ( JIA ) , including global assessment s , articular indices , functional/disability assessment s , and quality of life measures .
METHODS As part of an Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality comparative effectiveness review of antirheumatic drugs , we explored the characteristics of commonly used outcome measures for JIA .
Preliminary validation of clinical remission criteria using the OMERACT filter for select categories of juvenile idiopathic arthritis.
OBJECTIVE To begin the validation process of the preliminary criteria for inactive disease ( ID ) , clinical remission on medication ( CRM ) , and clinical remission off medication ( CR ) in children with select forms of juvenile idiopathic arthritis ( JIA ) . METHODS We used the OMERACT filter paradigm to estimate the validity of the criteria within each of the filter 's 3 components : truth , discrimination , and feasibility , in 5 categories of JIA : systemic arthritis , persistent and extended oligoarthritis , and rheumatoid factor-positive and negative polyarthritis . Data sources for determining validity estimates included a Delphi question naire survey sent to 246 pediatric rheumatologists in 34 countries , a consensus conference attended by 20 senior pediatric rheumatologists representing 9 countries , a retrospective chart review of 437 patients with JIA from 3 tertiary care clinics who had been followed between 4 and 22 years , and the literature . RESULTS Truth component : face and content validity . These aspects of validity were largely established via the Delphi question naire exercise and the consensus conference . Using an 80 % consensus level , participants felt that a set of non-redundant variables could effectively differentiate the clinical states of ID , CRM , and CR . Criterion validity could not be irrefutably established because no gold st and ard for inactive disease exists for JIA . As an alternative , published investigations of remission in JIA were used to estimate concurrent and convergent validity , as surrogates for criterion validity and as indicators of overall construct validity . Correlational analyses revealed the new criteria to have good construct validity . Discrimination component : the criteria demonstrated moderate to high levels of classification , prognosis , and responsiveness ( sensitivity to change ) using data from the chart review . Patients who were able to attain CR remained disease-free for substantially longer periods than did those who attained only ID or CRM . Responsiveness was evidence d by the ability of the criteria to allow movement of most patients between the disease states , consistent with what is known of the course of the disease . Feasibility component : Results of the Delphi and consensus conference produced a set of criteria that are easily , quickly , and inexpensively completed in the physician 's office , and present minimal or no risk to the patient . CONCLUSION The preliminary criteria demonstrated moderate to excellent validity characteristics in some , but not all components of the OMERACT filter . Prospect i ve validation studies are under way
The  Childhood Health Assessment Question naire ( C-HAQ )  was the most extensively studied instrument and had high reliability , but only moderate correlations with other indices of disease activity and poor responsiveness to change in disease status .
The physician global assessment of disease activity ( PGA ) and articular indices had the strongest association with disease activity and were the most responsive to change .
Measures of psychosocial function and quality of life were moderately associated with measures of disease activity , but were less responsive to changes in disease status .
In children with JIA , no single instrument was superior in reliability or validity or in describing the impact of JIA .
Although the C-HAQ has been extensively evaluated , the PGA and articular indices appear to have the highest responsiveness to change and , therefore , the highest potential for detecting important differences in treatment response
OBJECTIVE To review the performance characteristics of the instruments most commonly used to measure clinical outcomes in juvenile idiopathic arthritis ( JIA ) , including global assessment s , articular indices , functional/disability assessment s , and quality of life measures .
METHODS As part of an Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality comparative effectiveness review of antirheumatic drugs , we explored the characteristics of commonly used outcome measures for JIA .