Nurses only and multidisciplinary teams were the most frequent professionals to provide education , and most educational interventions were delivered postdischarge .
Psychoeducational interventions were generally effective at reducing smoking and admissions for patients with ACS .
Culturally appropriate health education , self-management educational interventions , group medical visits and psychoeducational interventions were generally effective for patients with T2DM .
Results indicate that there is a body of current evidence about the efficacy of health education , its content and delivery methods for patients with ACS or T2DM .
OBJECTIVES This umbrella review aim ed to identify the current evidence on health education-related interventions for patients with acute coronary syndrome ( ACS ) or type two diabetes mellitus ( T2DM ) ; identify the educational content , delivery methods , intensity , duration and setting required .
The purpose was to provide recommendations for educational interventions for high-risk patients with both ACS and T2DM .
Implications of diabetes in patients with acute coronary syndromes. The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events.
BACKGROUND There are limited data describing the presenting characteristics , management , and outcomes of diabetic and nondiabetic patients with an acute coronary syndrome ( ACS ) . OBJECTIVE To examine differences in these factors , patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infa rct ion , non-ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infa rct ion , and unstable angina were enrolled in a large multinational coronary disease registry . METHODS The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events is a prospect i ve observational study of patients hospitalized with an ACS at 94 hospitals in 14 countries . The study sample consisted of 5403 patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infa rct ion , 4725 with non-ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infa rct ion , and 5988 with unstable angina . RESULTS Approximately 1 in 4 patients presented to participating hospitals with a history of diabetes . Patients with diabetes were older , more often women , with a greater prevalence of comorbidities , and they were less likely to be treated with effective cardiac therapies than nondiabetic patients . Patients with diabetes who developed an ACS were at increased risk for each hospital outcome examined including heart failure , renal failure , cardiogenic shock , and death . These differences remained after adjustment for potentially confounding prognostic factors . CONCLUSIONS A considerable proportion of patients with an ACS has diabetes and is at increased risk for adverse outcomes compared with patients without diabetes . There are certain proven therapeutic strategies that remain underused in the diabetic population . A more widespread awareness of this increased risk and a more diligent use of proven cardiac treatment approaches are indicated for patients with diabetes who develop an ACS
Nurses only and multidisciplinary teams were the most frequent professionals to provide education , and most educational interventions were delivered postdischarge .
Psychoeducational interventions were generally effective at reducing smoking and admissions for patients with ACS .
Culturally appropriate health education , self-management educational interventions , group medical visits and psychoeducational interventions were generally effective for patients with T2DM .
Results indicate that there is a body of current evidence about the efficacy of health education , its content and delivery methods for patients with ACS or T2DM .
OBJECTIVES This umbrella review aim ed to identify the current evidence on health education-related interventions for patients with acute coronary syndrome ( ACS ) or type two diabetes mellitus ( T2DM ) ; identify the educational content , delivery methods , intensity , duration and setting required .
The purpose was to provide recommendations for educational interventions for high-risk patients with both ACS and T2DM .