In claudication patients , SE is more effective than UE at improving maximal walking and claudication distances , yet there is no difference in general quality of life or patient-reported community-based walking .
BACKGROUND Supervised exercise ( SE ) is widely accepted as an effective therapy for intermittent claudication ( IC ) , but its use is limited by cost .
Unsupervised exercise ( UE ) represents a less costly alternative .
We assessed the comparative effectiveness of SE vs UE in patients with IC .
Optimal exercise program length for patients with claudication.
BACKGROUND This prospect i ve , r and omized controlled clinical trial determined whether an optimal exercise program length exists to efficaciously change claudication onset time ( COT ) and peak walking time ( PWT ) in patients with peripheral artery disease and claudication . METHODS The study r and omized 142 patients to supervised exercise ( n = 106 ) or a usual care control group ( n = 36 ) , with 80 completing the exercise program and 27 completing the control intervention .  The exercise program consisted of intermittent walking to nearly maximal claudication pain 3 days per week . COT and PWT were the primary outcomes obtained from a treadmill exercise test at baseline and bimonthly during the study . RESULTS After exercise , changes in COT ( P < .001 ) and PWT ( P < .001 ) were consistently greater than changes after the control intervention . In the exercise program , COT and PWT increased from baseline to month 2 ( P < .05 ) and from months 2 to 4 ( P < .05 ) but did not significantly change from months 4 to 6 ( P > .05 ) . When changes were expressed per mile walked during the first 2 months , middle 2 months , and final 2 months of exercise , COT and PWT only increased during the first 2 months ( P < .05 ) . CONCLUSIONS Exercise-mediated gains in COT and PWT occur rapidly within the first 2 months of exercise rehabilitation and are maintained with further training . The clinical significance is that a relatively short 2-month exercise program may be preferred to a longer program to treat claudication because adherence is higher , costs associated with personnel and use of facilities are lower per patient , and more patients can be trained for a given amount of personnel time and re source utilization
In claudication patients , SE is more effective than UE at improving maximal walking and claudication distances , yet there is no difference in general quality of life or patient-reported community-based walking .
BACKGROUND Supervised exercise ( SE ) is widely accepted as an effective therapy for intermittent claudication ( IC ) , but its use is limited by cost .
Unsupervised exercise ( UE ) represents a less costly alternative .
We assessed the comparative effectiveness of SE vs UE in patients with IC .