Our case study successfully enabled us to address the four feasibility metrics , and we provide new information on management feasibility ( i.e. estimate data completeness and estimate data entry ) and scientific outcomes feasibility ( i.e. determining data collection material s appropriateness ) .
Conclusion Our review highlights the existing research and provides a case study which assesses important metrics of study feasibility .
Background Much research has been undertaken to establish the important benefits of physical activity in persons with multiple sclerosis ( MS ) .
There is disagreement regarding the strength of this research , perhaps because the majority of studies on physical activity and its benefits have not undergone initial and systematic feasibility testing .
We aim to address the feasibility processes that have been examined within the context of physical activity interventions in MS .
Pragmatic exercise intervention in people with mild to moderate multiple sclerosis: a randomised controlled feasibility study.
BACKGROUND People with Multiple Sclerosis ( PwMS ) are less physically active than the general population and pragmatic approaches design ed to equip them with the skills and confidence to participate in long-term physical activity are required . OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to determine the feasibility of a pragmatic exercise intervention in PwMS . METHODS A voluntary sample of 30 PwMS ( male n = 4 , female n = 26 ; mean age = 40 years ; range = 24 - 49 years ) , with mild to moderate disability ( EDSS ≤ 5.5 ) , were recruited from eligible participants attending outpatient clinics . A total of 28 participants were r and omised to a 10 week pragmatic exercise intervention ( 2 × supervised and 1 × home-based session per week ) or usual care . Clinical , functional and quality of life ( MSQoL-54 ) outcomes were assessed at baseline , immediately and 3 months after the intervention . RESULTS Attrition was low ( 2 participants lost to immediate follow-up and 4 participants lost to 3 month follow-up ) , with high compliance rates ( > 75 % of all sessions ) . The intervention group achieved progression of exercise volume ( 24.3 ± 7.0 to 30.9 ± 5.5 min per session ) , intensity ( 60.4 ± 8.8 to 67.7 ± 6.9 % HR max ) and training impulse ( min × average HR = training impulse/load [ arbitrary units ; AU ] ) ( 2600 ± 1105 to 3210 ± 1269AU ) during the intervention , whilst significantly increasing(P = 0.050 ) their physical composite score ( MSQOL-54 ) at 10 weeks and readiness to exercise ( P = 0.003 ) at 3 months compared with usual care . CONCLUSION This pragmatic intervention was feasible for PwMS , but further research is needed to assess its long-term impact on physical activity behaviour
Our case study successfully enabled us to address the four feasibility metrics , and we provide new information on management feasibility ( i.e. estimate data completeness and estimate data entry ) and scientific outcomes feasibility ( i.e. determining data collection material s appropriateness ) .
Conclusion Our review highlights the existing research and provides a case study which assesses important metrics of study feasibility .
Background Much research has been undertaken to establish the important benefits of physical activity in persons with multiple sclerosis ( MS ) .
There is disagreement regarding the strength of this research , perhaps because the majority of studies on physical activity and its benefits have not undergone initial and systematic feasibility testing .
We aim to address the feasibility processes that have been examined within the context of physical activity interventions in MS .