Conclusion The current best evidence indicates that a glass ionomer cement has a significantly lower risk of loss of a NCCL restoration compared to either a three-step etch- and -rinse or a two-step etch- and -rinse adhesive system ; a three-step etch- and -rinse adhesive system has a significantly lower risk of loss of a NCCL restoration compared to a two-step etch- and -rinse adhesive system .
No significant difference could be observed in the risk of loss of a tooth-colored NCCL restoration between a three-step etch- and -rinse adhesive system and either a two-step self-etch or a one-step self-etch adhesive system
Objectives The aim of this review was to assess the effect of different adhesive systems and tooth preparation on the retention of tooth-colored restorative material s  placed in non-carious cervical lesions ( NCCLs ) .
Class V lesions restored with four different tooth-colored materials – 3-year results
Abstract The aim of this study was to compare the treatment results using four different types of tooth colored material s for restoring class V lesions . A total of 197 class V restorations ( n=197 ) were placed by one dentist in 37 patients on incisors , canines and premolars . The fillings were placed due to different indications : erosion/non-carious cervical defects ( n=69 ) , primary carious lesions ( n=57 ) , and for replacing defective existing fillings ( n=71 ) . The teeth were assigned on a r and om basis to four groups for restoration with either a composite ( group 1 : n=36 ; Tetric , Vivadent ) , or a polyacid-modified resin composite ( group 2 : n=79 ; Dyract , Dentsply ) , or one of two different resin-modified glass ionomer cements ( group 3 : n=51 , Fuji II LC , GC ; group 4 : n=31 , Photac-Fil , Espe ) . The restorations were evaluated by a single-blind design , according to a modified USPHS system 36 months following placement . Statistical analysis was completed with the Pearson Chi-square test for comparing the results of the four groups ( P<0.05 ) . Additionally , the survival rates were analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier estimator and the Log-rank test ( P<0.05 ) . The Alpha ratings were as follows ( Tetric/Dyract/Fuji II LC/Photac Fil ) : shade match ( 86%/77%/58%/40 % ) , surface texture ( 81%/83%/16%/9 % ) , marginal integrity ( enamel ) ( 73%/67%/61%/61 % ) , marginal integrity ( dentin ) ( 86%/70%/55%/61 % ) , marginal discoloration ( enamel ) ( 59%/44%/58%/52 % ) , marginal discoloration ( dentin ) ( 82%/84%/71%/48 % ) , anatomic contours ( 91%/83%/39%/ 35 % ) . One Tetric restoration , five Dyract restorations , two Fuji II LC restorations and three Photac restorations were dislodged within the study period . The retention of the restorations showed no significant difference among the four material s. However , the clinical performance of the restorations retained over the 3-year period showed distinct differences for the four material s. The best clinical performance was observed for the resin composite , whereas the quality of the Dyract restorations without enamel etching was worse . The poorest results were obtained for the restorations with the resin-modified glass ionomers
Conclusion The current best evidence indicates that a glass ionomer cement has a significantly lower risk of loss of a NCCL restoration compared to either a three-step etch- and -rinse or a two-step etch- and -rinse adhesive system ; a three-step etch- and -rinse adhesive system has a significantly lower risk of loss of a NCCL restoration compared to a two-step etch- and -rinse adhesive system .
No significant difference could be observed in the risk of loss of a tooth-colored NCCL restoration between a three-step etch- and -rinse adhesive system and either a two-step self-etch or a one-step self-etch adhesive system
Objectives The aim of this review was to assess the effect of different adhesive systems and tooth preparation on the retention of tooth-colored restorative material s  placed in non-carious cervical lesions ( NCCLs ) .