There was no increased risk of infections with IV iron .
Gastrointestinal AEs were reduced with IV iron .
CONCLUSION Intravenous iron therapy is not associated with an increased risk of SAEs or infections .
Infusion reactions are more pronounced with IV iron
OBJECTIVE To amass all available evidence regarding the safety of intravenous ( IV ) iron preparations to provide a true balance of efficacy and safety .
Intravenous Iron Sucrose versus Oral Iron Supplementation for the Treatment of Iron Deficiency Anemia in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease—A Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label, Multicenter Study
OBJECTIVES : Anemia is a frequent complication in patients with inflammatory bowel disease ( IBD ) . The optimal route for iron supplementation to replenish iron stores has not been determined so far . We therefore evaluated the efficacy and safety of intravenous iron sucrose as compared with oral iron sulfate for the treatment of iron deficiency anemia ( IDA ) in patients with IBD . METHODS : A r and omized , prospect i ve , open-label , multicenter study was performed in 46 patients with anemia and transferrin saturation ≤20 % and /or serum ferritin concentrations ≤20 μg/L. The intravenous group received a single dose of iron sucrose of 7 mg iron/kg body weight , followed by five 200 mg infusions for the following 5 wks . The oral group received iron sulfate 100–200 mg per day for 6 wks . RESULTS : While a comparable increase in hemoglobin was observed for both administration routes ( median increase 0.25 g/L in the intravenous group vs 0.21 g/L in the oral group ) , only iron sucrose led to a rise in serum ferritin concentrations . Intractable gastrointestinal adverse events caused permanent study drug discontinuation in five patients ( 20.8 % ) receiving iron sulfate , whereas only one patient ( 4.5 % ) had to be withdrawn because of side effects due to iron sucrose . CONCLUSIONS : Although being equal in short-term efficacy and overall tolerability our results suggest a better gastrointestinal tolerability for iron sucrose . Larger trials are m and atory to prove a possible advantage of iron sucrose in short- and long-term efficacy as well as in tolerability over iron sulfate in the management of IDA in IBD
There was no increased risk of infections with IV iron .
Gastrointestinal AEs were reduced with IV iron .
CONCLUSION Intravenous iron therapy is not associated with an increased risk of SAEs or infections .
Infusion reactions are more pronounced with IV iron
OBJECTIVE To amass all available evidence regarding the safety of intravenous ( IV ) iron preparations to provide a true balance of efficacy and safety .