REVIEW ER 'S CONCLUSIONS There is no evidence to support feeding with a hydrolysed formula for the prevention of allergy in preference to exclusive breast feeding .
In high risk infants who are unable to be completely breast fed , there is evidence that prolonged feeding with a hydrolysed compared to a cow 's milk formula reduces infant and childhood allergy and infant CMA .
BACKGROUND Allergies and food reactions are common and may be associated with foods including adapted cow 's milk formulas .
Formulas containing hydrolysed proteins have been used to treat infants with allergy or food intolerance , and have been advocated for prevention of allergy and food intolerance in infants .
OBJECTIVES To determine whether use of hydrolysed formulas for infant feeding prevents allergy and food intolerance .
If hydrolysed formulas are effective , to determine what type of hydrolysed formula is most effective including extensively and partially hydrolysed formulas .
To determine which infants benefit including infants at low or high risk of allergy and infants receiving early , short term or prolonged formula feeding .
Hydrolysed protein accelerates the gastrointestinal transport of formula in preterm infants
Vomiting , large gastric residuals and abdominal distension are common in very immature infants on formula feeding . The present trial investigated whether a protein hydrolysate formula reduces the gastrointestinal transit time in preterm infants . Fifteen preterm infants ( median gestational age 29 ( 24–32 ) wk , birthweight 1241 ( 660–1900 ) g , postnatal age 18 ( 5–54 ) d ) on full enteral feeds ( > 150 ml/kg*d ) were enrolled . It was hypothesized that the gastrointestinal transit time is at least 2 h shorter when protein hydrolysate formula is fed compared with st and ard preterm formula . In a r and omized cross‐over design study , each formula was fed for 5 d. On days 4 and 9 the gastrointestinal transit time was estimated using carmine red . The protein hydrolysate formula had a markedly shorter gastrointestinal transit time ( 9.8 h ) than the st and ard formula ( 19 h ) ( p= 0.0022 , two‐sided Mann‐Whitney U test )
REVIEW ER 'S CONCLUSIONS There is no evidence to support feeding with a hydrolysed formula for the prevention of allergy in preference to exclusive breast feeding .
In high risk infants who are unable to be completely breast fed , there is evidence that prolonged feeding with a hydrolysed compared to a cow 's milk formula reduces infant and childhood allergy and infant CMA .
BACKGROUND Allergies and food reactions are common and may be associated with foods including adapted cow 's milk formulas .
Formulas containing hydrolysed proteins have been used to treat infants with allergy or food intolerance , and have been advocated for prevention of allergy and food intolerance in infants .
OBJECTIVES To determine whether use of hydrolysed formulas for infant feeding prevents allergy and food intolerance .
If hydrolysed formulas are effective , to determine what type of hydrolysed formula is most effective including extensively and partially hydrolysed formulas .
To determine which infants benefit including infants at low or high risk of allergy and infants receiving early , short term or prolonged formula feeding .