There was interaction by food source , with specific food sources showing beneficial effects ( fruit and fruit juice ) or harmful effects ( sweetened milk and mixed sources ) in substitution studies and harmful effects ( sugars‐sweetened beverages and fruit juice ) in addition studies on at least one outcome .
Conclusions Energy control and food source appear to mediate the effect of fructose‐containing sugars on glycaemic control .
Although most food sources of these sugars ( especially fruit ) do not have a harmful effect in energy matched substitutions with other macronutrients , several food sources of fructose‐containing sugars ( especially sugars‐sweetened beverages ) adding excess energy to diets have harmful effects .
Objective To assess the effect of different food sources of fructose‐containing sugars  on glycaemic control at different levels of energy control .
Family dietary coaching to improve nutritional intakes and body weight control: a randomized controlled trial.
OBJECTIVE To test the hypothesis that family dietary coaching would improve nutritional intakes and weight control in free-living ( noninstitutionalized ) children and parents . DESIGN R and omized controlled trial . SETTING Fifty-four elementary schools in Paris , France . PARTICIPANTS One thous and thirteen children ( mean age , 7.7 years ) and 1013 parents ( mean age , 40.5 years ) . INTERVENTION Families were r and omly assigned to group A ( advised to reduce fat and to increase complex carbohydrate intake ) , group B ( advised to reduce both fat and sugar and to increase complex carbohydrate intake ) , or a control group ( given no advice ) . Groups A and B received monthly phone counseling and Internet-based monitoring for 8 months . OUTCOME MEASURES Changes in nutritional intake , body mass index ( calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared ) , fat mass , physical activity , blood indicators , and quality of life . RESULTS Compared with controls , participants in the intervention groups achieved their nutritional targets for fat intake and to a smaller extent for sugar and complex carbohydrate intake , leading to a decrease in energy intake ( children , P < .001 ; parents , P = .02 ) . Mean changes in body mass index were similar among children ( group A , + 0.05 , 95 % confidence interval [ CI ] , - 0.06 to 0.16 ; group B , + 0.10 , 95 % CI , - 0.03 to 0.23 ; control group , + 0.13 , 95 % CI , 0.04 - 0.22 ; P = .45 ) , but differed in parents ( group A , + 0.13 , 95 % CI , - 0.01 to 0.27 ; group B , - 0.02 , 95 % CI , - 0.14 to 0.11 ; control group , + 0.24 , 95 % CI , 0.13 - 0.34 ; P = .001 ) , with a significant difference between group B and the control group ( P = .01 ) . CONCLUSIONS Family dietary coaching improves nutritional intake in free-living children and parents , with beneficial effects on weight control in parents . Trial Registration clinical trials.gov Identifier : NCT00456911
There was interaction by food source , with specific food sources showing beneficial effects ( fruit and fruit juice ) or harmful effects ( sweetened milk and mixed sources ) in substitution studies and harmful effects ( sugars‐sweetened beverages and fruit juice ) in addition studies on at least one outcome .
Conclusions Energy control and food source appear to mediate the effect of fructose‐containing sugars on glycaemic control .
Although most food sources of these sugars ( especially fruit ) do not have a harmful effect in energy matched substitutions with other macronutrients , several food sources of fructose‐containing sugars ( especially sugars‐sweetened beverages ) adding excess energy to diets have harmful effects .
Objective To assess the effect of different food sources of fructose‐containing sugars  on glycaemic control at different levels of energy control .