Women taking HT had a significantly decreased incidence of fracture with long-term use .
Research ers found no strong evidence that HT has a clinical ly meaningful impact on the incidence of colorectal cancer .
AUTHORS ' CONCLUSIONS : Women with intolerable menopausal symptoms may wish to weigh the benefits of symptom relief against the small absolute risk of harm arising from short-term use of low-dose HT , provided they do not have specific contraindications .
HT may be unsuitable for some women , including those at increased risk of cardiovascular disease , increased risk of thromboembolic disease ( such as those with obesity or a history of venous thrombosis ) or increased risk of some types of cancer ( such as breast cancer , in women with a uterus ) .
The risk of endometrial cancer among women with a uterus taking oestrogen-only HT is well documented .
HT is not indicated for primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease or dementia , nor for prevention of deterioration of cognitive function in postmenopausal women .
Although HT is considered effective for the prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis , it is generally recommended as an option only for women at significant risk for whom non-oestrogen therapies are unsuitable .
BACKGROUND : Hormone therapy ( HT ) is widely provided for control of menopausal symptoms and has been used for the management and prevention of cardiovascular disease , osteoporosis and  dementia in older women .
This is an up date d version of a Cochrane review first published in 2005 .
OBJECTIVES : To assess effects of long-term HT ( at least 1 year 's duration ) on mortality , cardiovascular outcomes , cancer , gallbladder disease , fracture and cognition in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women during and after cessation of treatment .
Estrogen plus progestin and the risk of coronary heart disease.
BACKGROUND Recent r and omized clinical trials have suggested that estrogen plus progestin does not confer cardiac protection and may increase the risk of coronary heart disease ( CHD ) . In this report , we provide the final results with regard to estrogen plus progestin and CHD from the Women 's Health Initiative ( WHI ) . METHODS The WHI included a r and omized primary -prevention trial of estrogen plus progestin in 16,608 postmenopausal women who were 50 to 79 years of age at base line . Participants were r and omly assigned to receive conjugated equine estrogens ( 0.625 mg per day ) plus medroxyprogesterone acetate ( 2.5 mg per day ) or placebo . The primary efficacy outcome of the trial was CHD ( nonfatal myocardial infa rct ion or death due to CHD ) . RESULTS After a mean follow-up of 5.2 years ( planned duration , 8.5 years ) , the data and safety monitoring board recommended terminating the estrogen-plus-progestin trial because the overall risks exceeded the benefits . Combined hormone therapy was associated with a hazard ratio for CHD of 1.24 ( nominal 95 percent confidence interval , 1.00 to 1.54 ; 95 percent confidence interval after adjustment for sequential monitoring , 0.97 to 1.60 ) . The elevation in risk was most apparent at one year ( hazard ratio , 1.81 [ 95 percent confidence interval , 1.09 to 3.01 ] ) . Although higher base-line levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol were associated with an excess risk of CHD among women who received hormone therapy , higher base-line levels of C-reactive protein , other biomarkers , and other clinical characteristics did not significantly modify the treatment-related risk of CHD . CONCLUSIONS Estrogen plus progestin does not confer cardiac protection and may increase the risk of CHD among generally healthy postmenopausal women , especially during the first year after the initiation of hormone use . This treatment should not be prescribed for the prevention of cardiovascular disease
Women taking HT had a significantly decreased incidence of fracture with long-term use .
Research ers found no strong evidence that HT has a clinical ly meaningful impact on the incidence of colorectal cancer .
AUTHORS ' CONCLUSIONS : Women with intolerable menopausal symptoms may wish to weigh the benefits of symptom relief against the small absolute risk of harm arising from short-term use of low-dose HT , provided they do not have specific contraindications .
HT may be unsuitable for some women , including those at increased risk of cardiovascular disease , increased risk of thromboembolic disease ( such as those with obesity or a history of venous thrombosis ) or increased risk of some types of cancer ( such as breast cancer , in women with a uterus ) .
The risk of endometrial cancer among women with a uterus taking oestrogen-only HT is well documented .
HT is not indicated for primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease or dementia , nor for prevention of deterioration of cognitive function in postmenopausal women .
Although HT is considered effective for the prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis , it is generally recommended as an option only for women at significant risk for whom non-oestrogen therapies are unsuitable .
BACKGROUND : Hormone therapy ( HT ) is widely provided for control of menopausal symptoms and has been used for the management and prevention of cardiovascular disease , osteoporosis and  dementia in older women .
This is an up date d version of a Cochrane review first published in 2005 .
OBJECTIVES : To assess effects of long-term HT ( at least 1 year 's duration ) on mortality , cardiovascular outcomes , cancer , gallbladder disease , fracture and cognition in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women during and after cessation of treatment .