Conclusion Based on the current data , the use of DM acetabular components are effective in minimising the risk of instability after both primary and revision THA .
This benefit must be balanced against continuing concerns about the additional modularity , and the new mode of failure of intraprosthetic dislocation .
Aims The aim of this systematic review was to report the rate of dislocation following the use of dual mobility ( DM ) acetabular components in primary and revision total hip arthroplasty ( THA ) .
Large femoral heads decrease the incidence of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.
BACKGROUND The use of larger femoral heads has been proposed to reduce the risk of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty , but there is a lack of evidence to support this proposal . The aim of this multicenter r and omized controlled trial was to determine whether the incidence of dislocation one year after total hip arthroplasty is significantly lower in association with the use of a 36-mm femoral head articulation as compared with a 28-mm articulation . METHODS Six hundred and forty-four middle-aged and elderly patients undergoing primary or revision arthroplasty were r and omized intraoperatively to receive either a 36 or 28-mm metal femoral head on highly cross-linked polyethylene .  Patients who were at high risk of dislocation ( including those with dementia and neuromuscular disease ) and those undergoing revision for the treatment of recurrent hip dislocation or infection were excluded . Patients were stratified according to other potential risk factors for dislocation , including diagnosis and age . Diagnosis of hip dislocation required confirmation by a physician and radiographic evidence of a dislocation . RESULTS Overall , at one year of follow-up , hips with a 36-mm femoral head articulation had a significantly lower incidence of dislocation than did those with a 28-mm articulation ( 1.3 % [ four of 299 ] compared with 5.4 % [ seventeen of 316 ] ; difference , 4.1 % [ 95 % confidence interval , 1.2 % to 7.2 % ] ) when controlling for the type of procedure ( primary or revision ) ( p = 0.012 ) . The incidence of dislocation following primary arthroplasty was also significantly lower for hips with a 36-mm femoral head articulation than for those with a 28-mm articulation ( 0.8 % [ two of 258 ] compared with 4.4 % [ twelve of 275 ] ; difference , 3.6 % [ 95 % confidence interval , 0.9 % to 6.8 % ] ) ( p = 0.024 ) . The incidence of dislocation following revision arthroplasty was 4.9 % ( two of forty-one ) for hips with a 36-mm articulation and 12.2 % ( five of forty-one ) for hips with a 28-mm articulation ; this difference was not significant with the relatively small sample size of the revision group ( difference , 7.3 % [ 95 % confidence interval , -5.9 % to 21.1 % ] ) ( p = 0.273 ) . CONCLUSIONS Compared with a 28-mm femoral head articulation , a larger 36-mm articulation result ed in a significantly decreased incidence of dislocation in the first year following primary total hip arthroplasty . However , before a 36-mm metal-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene articulation is widely recommended , the incidence of late dislocation , wear , periprosthetic osteolysis , and liner fracture should be established
Conclusion Based on the current data , the use of DM acetabular components are effective in minimising the risk of instability after both primary and revision THA .
This benefit must be balanced against continuing concerns about the additional modularity , and the new mode of failure of intraprosthetic dislocation .
Aims The aim of this systematic review was to report the rate of dislocation following the use of dual mobility ( DM ) acetabular components in primary and revision total hip arthroplasty ( THA ) .