Conclusions The present systematic review and meta- analysis indicate similar clinical performances of bulk-fill and conventional resin composites over a follow-up period of 12 to 72 months .
Clinical significance Based on the results of this study , the bulk-fill resin composites could be an alternative for direct restorations in posterior teeth .
Objectives The purpose of this systematic review was to compare the clinical performance of bulk-fill resin composites with conventional resin composites used for direct restorations of posterior teeth .
The research question was “ Do bulk-fill resin composites have a clinical performance comparable to conventional resin composites in posterior restorations ? ”
Composite resin restoration and postoperative sensitivity: clinical follow-up in an undergraduate program.
OBJECTIVES To analyze the relationship between the cavity depth and liners with postoperative sensitivity of  resin composite restorations .  METHODS A clinical follow-up was conducted on 319 resin composite restorations made in the final year of an undergraduate program over a 3-year period . Along with the analyses of cavity type , cavity depth , type of pulpal protection and the material s used , the postoperative sensitivity was also examined on each restoration . RESULTS Thirty-nine percent of the restorations had no protective layer ( Group 1 ) . As the depth of the prepared cavities increased , the restorations received one of the three pulpal protection methods ; a calcium hydroxide base ( Group 2 ) , glass ionomer cement ( Group 3 ) , or protection with a calcium hydroxide base in combination with glass ionomer cement ( Group 4 ) . The incidence of postoperative sensitivity showed no significant difference among Groups 1 , 2 and 3 , but was significantly lower in Group 1 than in Group 4 . The restorations made in shallow and medium depth cavities demonstrated significantly less-postoperative sensitivity than those made in deep cavities . The newer generation dentine-bonding agents showed a significantly lower incidence of postoperative sensitivity than the early generation group . CONCLUSIONS Postoperative sensitivity in resin  composite restorations was not related to the absence of protective layers but increased with the depth of cavities restored with the resin composite . The type of dentine-bonding agents could also be responsible for postoperative sensitivity
Conclusions The present systematic review and meta- analysis indicate similar clinical performances of bulk-fill and conventional resin composites over a follow-up period of 12 to 72 months .
Clinical significance Based on the results of this study , the bulk-fill resin composites could be an alternative for direct restorations in posterior teeth .
Objectives The purpose of this systematic review was to compare the clinical performance of bulk-fill resin composites with conventional resin composites used for direct restorations of posterior teeth .
The research question was “ Do bulk-fill resin composites have a clinical performance comparable to conventional resin composites in posterior restorations ? ”