In most respects , all membranes and enamel matrix derivative ( EMD ) delivered better outcomes , in the range of 1 to 2 mm , than open flap debridement .
The use of any barrier type or EMD configuration was found to yield more Clinical Attachment Level ( CAL ) gain than any open flap configuration .
GTR was confirmed to be superior to open flap debridement
In a 1998 review article , Laurell and colleagues performed a meta- analysis of relevant guided tissue regeneration ( GTR ) articles over the previous 20 years ( 1 ) .
The purpose of the present research was to exp and on that work , particularly search ing for trends discriminating between bioabsorbable and non-bioabsorbable barriers , as well as the use of enamel matrix derivative , with respect to interproximal bony defects .
Topical and systemic antimicrobial therapy in guided tissue regeneration.
BACKGROUND Bacterial contamination of membrane material negatively affects healing after guided tissue regeneration ( GTR ) procedures ; conversely , flap connective tissue integration on barrier material improves the clinical outcomes . The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of topical application of antibiotics on : 1 ) clinical outcomes of  GTR surgical procedures using titanium reinforced exp and ed polytetrafluoroethylene ( ePTFE ) periodontal membrane ; 2 ) bacterial colonization of membrane material ; and 3 ) flap connective tissue-membrane integration . METHODS Fifty-six deep interproximal bony defects were treated with  GTR surgical procedures  using titanium reinforced ePTFE periodontal membranes . Patients were r and omly assigned to 1 of the 2 antimicrobial treatment groups : the test group received weekly topical application of 25 % metronidazole gel and the control group received systemic antibiotics ( amoxicillin plus clavulanic acid 1 g/day for 14 days ) . Clinical outcomes were assessed at 1 year ; the amount of bacterial contamination and connective tissue integration on membrane material was evaluated at time of membrane removal by means of a morphological ( SEM ) method . RESULTS No statistically significant difference was found between test and control groups in terms of clinical attachment ( CAL ) gain ( baseline CAL - 12 months CAL ; P = 0.2 ) and probing depth ( PD ) reduction ( baseline PD - 12 months PD ; P = 0.6 ) . A greater increase in gingival recession ( REC ) ( 12 months REC - baseline REC ) was found in the test group compared to the control group ( P = 0.003 ) . The SEM analysis revealed no statistically significant ( t test ) difference between test and control groups in the number of fields positive to integrated connective tissue ( P = 0.82 ) , while the number of fields positive to bacteria was statistically higher ( P < 0.001 ) in the control group . CONCLUSIONS Local antibiotic administration is more effective than systemic use in preventing membrane contamination , but it does not improve clinical outcomes due to an interference of the vehicle ( gel ) with gingival tissues which may reduce the potential benefits derived from better control of the bacterial load
In most respects , all membranes and enamel matrix derivative ( EMD ) delivered better outcomes , in the range of 1 to 2 mm , than open flap debridement .
The use of any barrier type or EMD configuration was found to yield more Clinical Attachment Level ( CAL ) gain than any open flap configuration .
GTR was confirmed to be superior to open flap debridement
In a 1998 review article , Laurell and colleagues performed a meta- analysis of relevant guided tissue regeneration ( GTR ) articles over the previous 20 years ( 1 ) .
The purpose of the present research was to exp and on that work , particularly search ing for trends discriminating between bioabsorbable and non-bioabsorbable barriers , as well as the use of enamel matrix derivative , with respect to interproximal bony defects .