However , in patients with IBD flares and inadequate responses to or side effects with oral preparations , intravenous iron supplementation is the therapy of choice .
Neither oral nor intravenous therapy seems to exacerbate the clinical course of IBD , and intravenous iron therapy can be administered even in active disease stages and concomitantly with biologics .
Based on the data presented , oral iron therapy should be preferred for patients with quiescent disease stages and trivial iron deficiency  anemia unless such patients are intolerant or have an inadequate response , whereas intravenous iron supplementation may be of advantage in patients with aggravated anemia or flares of IBD because inflammation hampers intestinal absorption of iron
Abstract Anemia is the most frequent complication of inflammatory bowel disease ( IBD ) , but anemia , mostly due to iron deficiency , has long been neglected in these patients .
The aim was to briefly present the pathophysiology , followed by a balanced overview of the different forms of iron replacement available , and subsequently , to perform a systematic review of studies performed in the last decade on the treatment of iron-deficiency anemia in IBD .
Ferric carboxymaltose in patients with heart failure and iron deficiency.
BACKGROUND Iron deficiency may impair aerobic performance . This study aim ed to determine whether treatment with intravenous iron ( ferric carboxymaltose ) would improve symptoms in patients who had heart failure , reduced left ventricular ejection fraction , and iron deficiency , either with or without anemia . METHODS We enrolled 459 patients with chronic heart failure of New York Heart Association ( NYHA ) functional class II or III , a left ventricular ejection fraction of 40 % or less ( for patients with NYHA class II ) or 45 % or less ( for NYHA class III ) , iron deficiency ( ferritin level < 100 microg per liter or between 100 and 299 microg per liter , if the transferrin saturation was < 20 % ) , and a hemoglobin level of 95 to 135 g per liter . Patients were r and omly assigned , in a 2:1 ratio , to receive 200 mg of intravenous iron ( ferric carboxymaltose ) or saline ( placebo ) . The primary end points were the self-reported Patient Global Assessment and NYHA functional class , both at week 24 . Secondary end points included the distance walked in 6 minutes and the health-related quality of life . RESULTS Among the patients receiving ferric carboxymaltose , 50 % reported being much or moderately improved , as compared with 28 % of patients receiving placebo , according to the Patient Global Assessment ( odds ratio for improvement , 2.51 ; 95 % confidence interval [ CI ] , 1.75 to 3.61 ) . Among the patients assigned to ferric carboxymaltose , 47 % had an NYHA functional class I or II at week 24 , as compared with 30 % of patients assigned to placebo ( odds ratio for improvement by one class , 2.40 ; 95 % CI , 1.55 to 3.71 ) . Results were similar in patients with anemia and those without anemia . Significant improvements were seen with ferric carboxymaltose in the distance on the 6-minute walk test and quality -of-life assessment s. The rates of death , adverse events , and serious adverse events were similar in the two study groups . CONCLUSIONS Treatment with intravenous ferric carboxymaltose in patients with chronic heart failure and iron deficiency , with or without anemia , improves symptoms , functional capacity , and quality of life ; the side-effect profile is acceptable . ( Clinical Trials.gov number , NCT00520780 )
However , in patients with IBD flares and inadequate responses to or side effects with oral preparations , intravenous iron supplementation is the therapy of choice .
Neither oral nor intravenous therapy seems to exacerbate the clinical course of IBD , and intravenous iron therapy can be administered even in active disease stages and concomitantly with biologics .
Based on the data presented , oral iron therapy should be preferred for patients with quiescent disease stages and trivial iron deficiency  anemia unless such patients are intolerant or have an inadequate response , whereas intravenous iron supplementation may be of advantage in patients with aggravated anemia or flares of IBD because inflammation hampers intestinal absorption of iron
Abstract Anemia is the most frequent complication of inflammatory bowel disease ( IBD ) , but anemia , mostly due to iron deficiency , has long been neglected in these patients .
The aim was to briefly present the pathophysiology , followed by a balanced overview of the different forms of iron replacement available , and subsequently , to perform a systematic review of studies performed in the last decade on the treatment of iron-deficiency anemia in IBD .