There was low- to very low- quality evidence that other interventions were not effective in reducing work-related upper limb and neck MSDs in adults .
We found moderate- quality evidence to suggest that the use of arm support with alternative mouse may reduce the incidence of neck/shoulder MSDs , but not right upper limb MSDs .
Moreover , we found moderate- quality evidence to suggest that the incidence of neck/shoulder and right upper limb MSDs is not reduced when comparing alternative and conventional mouse with and without arm support .
However , given there were multiple comparisons made involving a number of interventions and outcomes , high- quality evidence is needed to determine the effectiveness of these interventions clearly .
While we found very-low- to low- quality evidence to suggest that other ergonomic interventions do not prevent work-related MSDs of the upper limb and neck , this was limited by the paucity and heterogeneity of available studies .
BACKGROUND Work-related upper limb and neck musculoskeletal disorders ( MSDs ) are one of the most common occupational disorders around the world .
Although ergonomic design and training are likely to reduce the risk of workers developing work-related upper limb and neck MSDs , the evidence is unclear .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of workplace ergonomic design or training interventions , or both , for the prevention of work-related upper limb and neck MSDs in adults .
Effectiveness of a feedback signal in a computer mouse on upper extremity musculoskeletal symptoms: a randomised controlled trial with an 8-month follow-up
Objectives : To study the effectiveness of using a computer mouse with a feedback signal for upper extremity musculoskeletal symptoms in office workers . Methods : A r and omised controlled trial with 8 months of follow-up was carried out . The intervention consisted of a computer mouse with a feedback signal . In total , 354 subjects were allocated to the intervention group or the  control group . Measurements were performed with electronic question naires at baseline , after 4 months and after 8 months . Outcome variables were the prevalence and incidence of upper extremity musculoskeletal symptoms and disability in the upper extremities . The intervention process was evaluated by software registration . Results : The use of the mouse with a feedback signal result ed in a significant decrease in duration of mouse usage over time . No differences were found in the number of mouse usage rest breaks . No differences were found in the prevalence ( p = 0.29 ) or incidence ( p = 0.832 ) of upper extremity musculoskeletal symptoms between the groups 8 months after baseline . The prevalence decreased from 49 % at baseline to 44 % after 8 months in the control group , while it remained at 36 % in the intervention group . The incidence was 21 % in the control group and 22 % in the intervention group . Among the population with upper extremity musculoskeletal symptoms at baseline , the risk of experiencing symptoms after 8 months did not differ between the groups ( p = 0.49 ) . Minor disability was found in both groups . In the intervention group , a lower level of physical disability over time was reported than in the control group ( p = 0.02 ) . Conclusions : A feedback signal computer mouse does not affect the prevalence and incidence of upper extremity musculoskeletal symptoms , but it does lower disability scores . Given the high prevalence , study ing preventive interventions for upper extremity musculoskeletal symptoms is of high importance . Trial registration number : IS RCT N13222474
There was low- to very low- quality evidence that other interventions were not effective in reducing work-related upper limb and neck MSDs in adults .
We found moderate- quality evidence to suggest that the use of arm support with alternative mouse may reduce the incidence of neck/shoulder MSDs , but not right upper limb MSDs .
Moreover , we found moderate- quality evidence to suggest that the incidence of neck/shoulder and right upper limb MSDs is not reduced when comparing alternative and conventional mouse with and without arm support .
However , given there were multiple comparisons made involving a number of interventions and outcomes , high- quality evidence is needed to determine the effectiveness of these interventions clearly .
While we found very-low- to low- quality evidence to suggest that other ergonomic interventions do not prevent work-related MSDs of the upper limb and neck , this was limited by the paucity and heterogeneity of available studies .
BACKGROUND Work-related upper limb and neck musculoskeletal disorders ( MSDs ) are one of the most common occupational disorders around the world .
Although ergonomic design and training are likely to reduce the risk of workers developing work-related upper limb and neck MSDs , the evidence is unclear .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of workplace ergonomic design or training interventions , or both , for the prevention of work-related upper limb and neck MSDs in adults .