Conclusions All interventions produced positive effects on BMD scanning and osteoporosis treatment rates post-fracture .
Despite sizeable increases , investigation and treatment rates remain sub-optimal .
Background There is a large quality of care gap for patients with osteoporosis .
As a fragility fracture is a strong indicator of underlying osteoporosis , it offers an ideal opportunity to initiate investigation and treatment .
However , studies of post-fracture population s document screening and treatment rates below 20 % in most setting s. This is despite the fact that bone mineral density ( BMD ) scans are effective at identifying patients at high risk of fracture , and effective drug treatments are widely available .
Effective interventions are required to remedy this incongruity in current practice .
Information needs in the management of osteoporosis in family practice: an illustration of the failure of the current guideline implementation process
The objectives of this study were to determine information needs of family physicians around issues in the management of osteoporosis and preferences for dissemination of this information . A mailed survey was sent to a stratified r and om sample of 1000 family physicians in Ontario in May 2001 . Female physicians and those practicing in rural communities were over- sample d from the College of Family Physicians ' data base . Among the 505 respondents , 364 were still practicing ( 182 males and 182 females ) and completed the full question naire . There were no statistically significant differences in responses by sex or region of practice . Over 80 % of family physicians wanted to be more informed about bone density testing and the pharmacological and non-pharmacological management of osteoporosis .  The presence of risk factors was one of the most influential factors ( 72 % ) for ordering bone density testing . Information in peer- review ed journals was thought to be the most credible , with 80 % rating the CMAJ as very credible compared to 47 % for the Osteoporosis Society of Canada ( OSC ) . Sixty-two percent found the OSC guidelines ( 1996 ) to be useful even though much of that information is now out of date . Almost 70 % had not read the more recently published treatment guidelines from the Ontario Program for Optimal Therapeutics ( 2000 ) . Over 80 % were interested in a decision aid , which incorporates information on risk factors , fracture risk and a treatment algorithm . The perceived need and the lack of availability of clinical ly useful information on osteoporosis for the family practice setting highlights the failure of the current guideline implementation process and provides insight into where the process has to be improved
Conclusions All interventions produced positive effects on BMD scanning and osteoporosis treatment rates post-fracture .
Despite sizeable increases , investigation and treatment rates remain sub-optimal .
Background There is a large quality of care gap for patients with osteoporosis .
As a fragility fracture is a strong indicator of underlying osteoporosis , it offers an ideal opportunity to initiate investigation and treatment .
However , studies of post-fracture population s document screening and treatment rates below 20 % in most setting s. This is despite the fact that bone mineral density ( BMD ) scans are effective at identifying patients at high risk of fracture , and effective drug treatments are widely available .
Effective interventions are required to remedy this incongruity in current practice .