Conclusion In patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation  , cryoballoon and radiofrequency ablation produce similar results in terms of freedom from recurrent atrial fibrillation or atrial tachyarrhythmias but with a different safety profile , being cryoballoon ablation less associated with cardiac complications but more likely to cause phrenic nerve palsy
Aims To perform an up date d meta- analysis to assess efficacy , safety and technical performance of pulmonary vein isolation using cryoballoon or radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation .
Ablation of atrial fibrillation with cryoballoon or duty-cycled radiofrequency pulmonary vein ablation catheter: a randomized controlled study comparing the clinical outcome and safety; the AF-COR study.
AIMS The urge to facilitate the atrial fibrillation ( AF ) ablation procedure has led to the development of new ablation catheters specifically design ed as ' one-shot tools ' for pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) . The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy , safety , and procedure times for two such catheters using different energy sources . METHODS AND RESULTS One hundred and ten patients , referred for ablation of paroxysmal or persistent AF , were r and omized to treatment with either the cryoballoon or the circular multipolar duty-cycled radiofrequency-based pulmonary vein ablation catheter ( PVAC ) .  Complete PVI was achieved in 98 vs. 93 % patients in the cryoballoon and PVAC group , respectively , with complication rates of 8 vs. 2 % ( P = 0.2 ) . Complete freedom from AF , without antiarrhythmic drugs , after one single ablation procedure was seen in 46 % in the cryoballoon vs. 34 % after 12 months ( P = 0.2 ) . Procedure times were comparable , but fluoroscopy time was shorter for the cryoballoon ( 32 ± 16 min ) than for the PVAC procedures ( 47 ± 17 min ) ( P < 0.001 ) . A significant improvement of quality of life ( QoL ) and arrhythmia-related symptoms was seen in both groups after ablation . CONCLUSION Both catheters proved comparably effective and safe in achieving acute PVI , apart from the shorter fluoroscopy times achieved with the cryoballoon . At follow-up , there was no statistically significant difference between the groups regarding freedom from AF and clinical success . The QoL increased to the same levels as for the general Swedish population in both groups
Conclusion In patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation  , cryoballoon and radiofrequency ablation produce similar results in terms of freedom from recurrent atrial fibrillation or atrial tachyarrhythmias but with a different safety profile , being cryoballoon ablation less associated with cardiac complications but more likely to cause phrenic nerve palsy
Aims To perform an up date d meta- analysis to assess efficacy , safety and technical performance of pulmonary vein isolation using cryoballoon or radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation .