SUMMARY Despite a variety of measurement tools none can be recommended as gold st and ard for the assessment of dyspnoea .
A combination of unidimensional and multidimensional tools seems to be the best for clinical assessment .
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Refractory dyspnoea is a common and difficult to treat symptom in advanced disease .
Accurate assessment helps to guide treatment and prognosis .
RECENT FINDINGS The absence of commonly agreed assessment tools has been a significant barrier to improving care through inhibition of clinical research and limitation of clinicians ' ability to assess the effectiveness of their interventions .
Two recently published systematic review s on measurement tools for breathlessness identified a variety of tools but none could be recommended as gold st and ard .
For clinical purpose s , the combination of a unidimensional tool to assess dyspnoea severity and a multidimensional tool to evaluate the impact on a person 's quality of life seem most appropriate .
This review discusses the present evidence and puts forward a strategy for assessment and measurement of the symptom in clinical practice .
A measure of quality of life for clinical trials in chronic lung disease.
Since the relationships between pulmonary function , exercise capacity , and functional state or quality of life are generally weak , a self report question naire has been developed to determine the effect of treatment on quality of life in clinical trials . One hundred patients with chronic airflow limitation were asked how their quality of life was affected by their illness , and how important their symptoms and limitations were . The most frequent and important items were used to construct a question naire evaluating four dimensions : dyspnoea , fatigue , emotional function , and the patient 's feeling of control over the disease ( mastery ) . Reproducibility , tested by repeated administration to patients in a stable condition , was excellent : the coefficient of variation was less than 12 % for all four dimensions . Responsiveness ( sensitivity to change ) was tested by administering the question naire to 13 patients before and after optimisation of their drug treatment and to another 28 before and after participation in a respiratory rehabilitation programme .  In both cases large , statistically significant improvements in all four dimensions were noted . Changes in question naire score were correlated with changes in spirometric values , exercise capacity , and patients ' and physicians ' global ratings . Thus it has been shown that the question naire is precise , valid , and responsive . It can therefore serve as a useful disease specific measure of quality of life for clinical trials
SUMMARY Despite a variety of measurement tools none can be recommended as gold st and ard for the assessment of dyspnoea .
A combination of unidimensional and multidimensional tools seems to be the best for clinical assessment .
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Refractory dyspnoea is a common and difficult to treat symptom in advanced disease .
Accurate assessment helps to guide treatment and prognosis .
RECENT FINDINGS The absence of commonly agreed assessment tools has been a significant barrier to improving care through inhibition of clinical research and limitation of clinicians ' ability to assess the effectiveness of their interventions .
Two recently published systematic review s on measurement tools for breathlessness identified a variety of tools but none could be recommended as gold st and ard .
For clinical purpose s , the combination of a unidimensional tool to assess dyspnoea severity and a multidimensional tool to evaluate the impact on a person 's quality of life seem most appropriate .
This review discusses the present evidence and puts forward a strategy for assessment and measurement of the symptom in clinical practice .