Results indicated that some PFTs may have some prognostic utility , i.e. a trend for more clinical events to be associated with groups classified as ' aspirin resistant ' .
Study -level effect sizes were generally small and absolute outcome risk was not substantially different between ' aspirin resistant ' and ' aspirin sensitive ' design ations .
Based on assumptions of PFTs being able to accurately identify patients at high risk of clinical events and such patients benefiting from treatment modification , the economic model found that a test-treat strategy was likely to be cost-effective .
However , neither assumption is currently evidence based .
BACKGROUND The use of aspirin is well established for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease .
However , a proportion of patients suffer repeat cardiovascular events despite being prescribed aspirin treatment .
It is uncertain whether or not this is due to an inherent inability of aspirin to sufficiently modify platelet activity .
This report aims to investigate whether or not insufficient platelet function inhibition by aspirin ( ' aspirin resistance ' ) , as defined using platelet function tests ( PFTs ) , is linked to the occurrence of adverse clinical outcomes , and further , whether or not patients at risk of future adverse clinical events can be identified through PFTs .
OBJECTIVES To review systematic ally the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness evidence regarding the association between PFT design ation of ' aspirin resistance ' and the risk of adverse clinical outcome ( s ) in patients prescribed aspirin therapy .
To undertake exploratory model-based cost-effectiveness analysis on the use of PFTs .
Risk stratification after coronary artery bypass surgery by a point-of-care test of platelet function.
BACKGROUND Aspirin is one of the main therapeutics in prevention of cardiovascular events due to its antiplatelet activity . However , a sufficient inhibition of platelet function by aspirin is not always achieved . This means that the extent of protection from cardiovascular event is limited . Recently , several studies have introduced the concept of residual platelet reactivity during aspirin therapy and suggested that about 40 % of aspirin users may not respond adequately . We sought to determine whether the profile and prevalence of residual platelet reactivity , measured with the platelet function analyzer ( PFA-100 ; Dade/Behring , Marburg , Germany ) device could predict a recurrent cardiovascular event in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery . METHODS A cohort of 202 consecutive patients receiving primary coronary artery bypass surgery during 2004 was prospect ively recruited . All patients postoperatively received regular st and ard daily 100 mg aspirin .  Platelet function was analyzed by the PFA-100 at 30 + /- 6 days after surgery . A PFA100 closure time less than 190 seconds was defined as residual platelet reactivity . Eighty-six patients ( 43 % ) showed residual platelet reactivity . The mean follow-up time was 32 + /- 10 months and was 100 % complete . RESULTS A total of 75 cardiovascular events have been registered . The majority of these events were among patients with residual platelet activity ( p = 0.001 ) . Out of this number , graft failure was documented in 25 patients . The 42-month freedom from major cardiovascular events was significantly better for patients with adequate platelet inhibition ( p = 0.001 ) . At multivariable analysis residual platelet reactivity ( p = 0.012 ) , incomplete revascularization ( p = 0.029 ) , and diabetes ( p = 0.0009 ) were independently associated with occurrence of negative events . CONCLUSIONS Our results demonstrate that high residual platelet reactivity independently correlates with a worst clinical outcome in patients treated by  coronary artery bypass surgery . The PFA-100 point care test could cheaply and simply discover this condition and contribute to improve the outcome of this subset of patients
Results indicated that some PFTs may have some prognostic utility , i.e. a trend for more clinical events to be associated with groups classified as ' aspirin resistant ' .
Study -level effect sizes were generally small and absolute outcome risk was not substantially different between ' aspirin resistant ' and ' aspirin sensitive ' design ations .
Based on assumptions of PFTs being able to accurately identify patients at high risk of clinical events and such patients benefiting from treatment modification , the economic model found that a test-treat strategy was likely to be cost-effective .
However , neither assumption is currently evidence based .
BACKGROUND The use of aspirin is well established for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease .
However , a proportion of patients suffer repeat cardiovascular events despite being prescribed aspirin treatment .
It is uncertain whether or not this is due to an inherent inability of aspirin to sufficiently modify platelet activity .
This report aims to investigate whether or not insufficient platelet function inhibition by aspirin ( ' aspirin resistance ' ) , as defined using platelet function tests ( PFTs ) , is linked to the occurrence of adverse clinical outcomes , and further , whether or not patients at risk of future adverse clinical events can be identified through PFTs .
OBJECTIVES To review systematic ally the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness evidence regarding the association between PFT design ation of ' aspirin resistance ' and the risk of adverse clinical outcome ( s ) in patients prescribed aspirin therapy .
To undertake exploratory model-based cost-effectiveness analysis on the use of PFTs .