These data provide both validation and st and ards for other users and indicate the power of the instrument for detecting change in sample population s. CONCLUSIONS The  ODI  remains a valid and vigorous measure and has been a worthwhile outcome measure .
The behavior of the instrument is incompletely understood , particularly in sensitivity to real change
STUDY DESIGN The Oswestry Disability Index ( ODI ) has become one of the principal condition-specific outcome measures used in the management of spinal disorders .
This review is based on publications using the ODI identified from the authors ' personal data bases , the Science Citation Index , and h and search es of Spine and current textbooks of spinal disorders .
OBJECTIVES To review the versions of this instrument , document methods by which it has been vali date d , collate data from scores found in normal and back pain population s , provide curves for power calculations in studies using the ODI , and maintain the ODI as a gold st and ard outcome measure .
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA It has now been 20 years since its original publication .
More than 200 citations exist in the Science Citation Index .
Back school in a first episode of compensated acute low back pain: a clinical trial to assess efficacy and prevent relapse.
OBJECTIVE To assess the efficacy of a back school program for patients with a first episode of acute work-related low back pain requiring compensation . DESIGN A r and omized single-blind controlled trial . SETTING A private physiatrics outpatient clinic . PATIENTS The mean duration of low back pain was 15 days . INTERVENTION Eligible patients were r and omized to a st and ard treatment program that included daily physiotherapy ( n = 86 ) or the same program with the addition of back school ( n = 82 ) . The back school program consisted of three 90-minute sessions given by a single trained instructor at 0 , 1 , and 8 weeks . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcomes were the time off work for the presenting episode of back pain and the number and duration of recurrences in the year following the study onset . Secondary outcomes included the level of pain , spinal mobility , active straight-leg raising , and functional disability assessed by the Oswestry and Rol and -Morris scales . RESULTS Those r and omized to the back school group gained significantly more knowledge , based on the multiple choice examination ( p = .0001 ) and performed the exercise program significantly better ( p = .0001 ) than the st and ard care group . There were no differences between the two treatment groups for either of the primary outcomes . The median time to return to work from r and omization was 33 days for both the back school and the st and ard care groups ( p = .48 ) . The number of compensated recurrences of low back pain over 1 year was similar ( back school = 14 , st and ard care = 10 , p = .16 ) , as was the median duration of these episodes ( back school = 25 days , st and ard care = 70 days , p = .21 ) . There were no significant differences favoring the back school group for any of the secondary outcomes at the posttreatment , 6-month , or 12-month assessment s. CONCLUSION A back school intervention in addition to st and ard care result ed in no reduction in the time to return to work or the number or duration of recurrences of low back pain requiring compensation over a period of one year
These data provide both validation and st and ards for other users and indicate the power of the instrument for detecting change in sample population s. CONCLUSIONS The  ODI  remains a valid and vigorous measure and has been a worthwhile outcome measure .
The behavior of the instrument is incompletely understood , particularly in sensitivity to real change
STUDY DESIGN The Oswestry Disability Index ( ODI ) has become one of the principal condition-specific outcome measures used in the management of spinal disorders .
This review is based on publications using the ODI identified from the authors ' personal data bases , the Science Citation Index , and h and search es of Spine and current textbooks of spinal disorders .
OBJECTIVES To review the versions of this instrument , document methods by which it has been vali date d , collate data from scores found in normal and back pain population s , provide curves for power calculations in studies using the ODI , and maintain the ODI as a gold st and ard outcome measure .
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA It has now been 20 years since its original publication .
More than 200 citations exist in the Science Citation Index .