Active surveillance represents a viable option in men with low-risk PCa and a long life expectancy .
A biopsy progression indicates the need for active intervention , whereas the role of PSA doubling time is controversial .
In men with locally advanced PCa for whom local therapy is not m and atory , watchful waiting ( WW ) is a treatment alternative to and rogen-deprivation therapy ( ADT ) , with equivalent oncologic efficacy .
Active treatment is recommended mostly for patients with localized disease and a long life expectancy , with radical prostatectomy ( RP ) shown to be superior to WW in prospect i ve r and omized trials .
Nerve-sparing RP is the approach of choice in organ-confined disease , while neoadjuvant ADT provides no improvement in outcome variables .
For locally advanced disease , adjuvant ADT for 3 yr results in superior rates for disease-specific and overall survival and is the treatment of choice .
Active surveillance is an option in low-risk PCa and watchful waiting is an alternative to and rogen-deprivation therapy in locally advanced PCa not requiring immediate local treatment .
CONTEXT The most recent summary of the European Association of Urology ( EAU ) guidelines on prostate cancer ( PCa ) was published in 2011 .
OBJECTIVE To present a summary of the 2013 version of the EAU guidelines on screening , diagnosis , and local treatment with curative intent of clinical ly organ-confined PCa .
Current evidence is insufficient to warrant widespread population -based screening by prostate-specific antigen ( PSA ) for PCa .
Systematic prostate biopsies under ultrasound guidance and local anesthesia are the preferred diagnostic method .
CONCLUSIONS Knowledge in the field of PCa is rapidly changing .
Prevalence of prostate cancer among men with a prostate-specific antigen level < or =4.0 ng per milliliter.
BACKGROUND The optimal upper limit of the normal range for prostate-specific antigen ( PSA ) is unknown . We investigated the prevalence of prostate cancer among men in the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial who had a PSA level of 4.0 ng per milliliter or less . METHODS Of 18,882 men enrolled in the prevention trial , 9459 were r and omly assigned to receive placebo and had an annual measurement of PSA and a digital rectal examination . Among these 9459 men , 2950 men never had a PSA level of more than 4.0 ng per milliliter or an abnormal digital rectal examination , had a final PSA determination , and underwent a prostate biopsy after being in the study for seven years . RESULTS Among the 2950 men ( age range , 62 to 91 years ) , prostate cancer was diagnosed in 449 ( 15.2 percent ) ; 67 of these 449 cancers ( 14.9 percent ) had a Gleason score of 7 or higher . The prevalence of prostate cancer was 6.6 percent among men with a PSA level of up to 0.5 ng per milliliter , 10.1 percent among those with values of 0.6 to 1.0 ng per milliliter , 17.0 percent among those with values of 1.1 to 2.0 ng per milliliter , 23.9 percent among those with values of 2.1 to 3.0 ng per milliliter , and 26.9 percent among those with values of 3.1 to 4.0 ng per milliliter . The prevalence of high- grade cancers increased from 12.5 percent of cancers associated with a PSA level of 0.5 ng per milliliter or less to 25.0 percent of cancers associated with a PSA level of 3.1 to 4.0 ng per milliliter . CONCLUSIONS Biopsy-detected prostate cancer , including high- grade cancers , is not rare among men with PSA levels of 4.0 ng per milliliter or less -- levels generally thought to be in the normal range
Active surveillance represents a viable option in men with low-risk PCa and a long life expectancy .
A biopsy progression indicates the need for active intervention , whereas the role of PSA doubling time is controversial .
In men with locally advanced PCa for whom local therapy is not m and atory , watchful waiting ( WW ) is a treatment alternative to and rogen-deprivation therapy ( ADT ) , with equivalent oncologic efficacy .
Active treatment is recommended mostly for patients with localized disease and a long life expectancy , with radical prostatectomy ( RP ) shown to be superior to WW in prospect i ve r and omized trials .
Nerve-sparing RP is the approach of choice in organ-confined disease , while neoadjuvant ADT provides no improvement in outcome variables .
For locally advanced disease , adjuvant ADT for 3 yr results in superior rates for disease-specific and overall survival and is the treatment of choice .
Active surveillance is an option in low-risk PCa and watchful waiting is an alternative to and rogen-deprivation therapy in locally advanced PCa not requiring immediate local treatment .
CONTEXT The most recent summary of the European Association of Urology ( EAU ) guidelines on prostate cancer ( PCa ) was published in 2011 .
OBJECTIVE To present a summary of the 2013 version of the EAU guidelines on screening , diagnosis , and local treatment with curative intent of clinical ly organ-confined PCa .
Current evidence is insufficient to warrant widespread population -based screening by prostate-specific antigen ( PSA ) for PCa .
Systematic prostate biopsies under ultrasound guidance and local anesthesia are the preferred diagnostic method .
CONCLUSIONS Knowledge in the field of PCa is rapidly changing .