There was interaction by food source , with specific food sources showing beneficial effects ( fruit and fruit juice ) or harmful effects ( sweetened milk and mixed sources ) in substitution studies and harmful effects ( sugars‐sweetened beverages and fruit juice ) in addition studies on at least one outcome .
Conclusions Energy control and food source appear to mediate the effect of fructose‐containing sugars on glycaemic control .
Although most food sources of these sugars ( especially fruit ) do not have a harmful effect in energy matched substitutions with other macronutrients , several food sources of fructose‐containing sugars ( especially sugars‐sweetened beverages ) adding excess energy to diets have harmful effects .
Objective To assess the effect of different food sources of fructose‐containing sugars  on glycaemic control at different levels of energy control .
Two weeks of overfeeding with candy, but not peanuts, increases insulin levels and body weight
Abstract Objective : To study the effects of snacking based on fast acting carbohydrates ( c and y ) or fat and protein ( peanuts ) in a prospect i ve r and omized , parallel intervention study . Methods : Basal metabolic rate ( BMR ) and cardiovascular risk factors were measured before and after hyper-alimentation by addition of 20kcal/kg ( 84kJ/kg ) body weight of either c and y or roasted peanuts , to the regular caloric intake , for two weeks in healthy subjects . Eleven men and 14 women completed the r and omized study . Results : Energy-intake increased similarly in the groups ( c and y : + 46.1±35 % , peanuts : + 46.8±28 % p=0.96 ) . Body-weight ( c and y : from 67.3±7.6 kg to 68.1±7.3 kg , p=0.01 , nuts : from 68.7±6.1 kg to 69.0±5.7 kg p=0.3 ) and waist circumference increased significantly only in the c and y group . At the end of the study LDL cholesterol ( c and y : 2.6±0.4mmol/l peanuts : 2.1±0.4mmol/l , p=0.005 ) and ApoB/ApoA-1-ratio ( c and y : 0.68±0.16 peanuts 0.53±0.11 , p=0.01 ) were higher in the c and y group than in the peanut group . On the other h and , BMR increased only in the peanut group ( c and y : from 6.657±1.1MJ/24h to 6.762±1.1MJ/24h , p=0.3 nuts : from 6.896±0.98MJ/24h to 7.256±1.1MJ/24h , p=0.02 ) . Conclusion : Two weeks of snacking based on peanuts does not cause the same negative metabolic effects as an isocaloric diet in which the snacking is based on short acting carbohydrates in the form of c and y in non-obese healthy subjects
There was interaction by food source , with specific food sources showing beneficial effects ( fruit and fruit juice ) or harmful effects ( sweetened milk and mixed sources ) in substitution studies and harmful effects ( sugars‐sweetened beverages and fruit juice ) in addition studies on at least one outcome .
Conclusions Energy control and food source appear to mediate the effect of fructose‐containing sugars on glycaemic control .
Although most food sources of these sugars ( especially fruit ) do not have a harmful effect in energy matched substitutions with other macronutrients , several food sources of fructose‐containing sugars ( especially sugars‐sweetened beverages ) adding excess energy to diets have harmful effects .
Objective To assess the effect of different food sources of fructose‐containing sugars  on glycaemic control at different levels of energy control .