We found no clear evidence that paroxetine was more or less effective compared with other antidepressants at increasing response to treatment at acute ( six to 12 weeks ) , early ( one to four weeks ) , or longer term follow-up ( four to six months ) .
Paroxetine was associated with a lower rate of adverse events than amitriptyline , imipramine and older ADs as a class , but was less well tolerated than agomelatine and hypericum .
Some possibly clinical ly meaningful differences between paroxetine and other ADs exist , but no definitive conclusions can be drawn from these findings .
In terms of early response to treatment ( one to four weeks ) there was moderate quality of evidence that mirtazapine was better than paroxetine and that paroxetine was better than reboxetine .
However there was no clear evidence that paroxetine was better or worse compared with other antidepressants at increasing response to treatment at any time point .
BACKGROUND Paroxetine is the most potent inhibitor of the reuptake of serotonin of all selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors ( SSRIs ) and has been studied in many r and omised controlled trials ( RCTs ) .
However , these comparative studies provided contrasting findings and systematic review s of RCTs have always considered the SSRIs as a group , and evidence applicable to this group of drugs might not be applicable to paroxetine alone .
The present systematic review assessed the efficacy and tolerability profile of paroxetine in comparison with tricyclics ( TCAs ) , SSRIs and newer or non-conventional agents .
OBJECTIVES 1 .
To determine the efficacy of paroxetine in comparison with other anti-depressive agents in alleviating the acute symptoms of Major Depressive Disorder.2  .
To review acceptability of treatment with paroxetine in comparison with other anti-depressive agents.3 .
To investigate the adverse effects of paroxetine in comparison with other anti-depressive agents .
Acute Efficacy of Fluoxetine Versus Sertraline and Paroxetine in Major Depressive Disorder Including Effects of Baseline Insomnia
This study assessed whether fluoxetine , sertraline , and paroxetine differ in efficacy and tolerability in depressed patients and the impact of baseline insomnia on outcomes . Patients ( N = 284 ) with DSM-IV major depressive disorder were r and omly assigned in a double-blind fashion to fluoxetine , paroxetine , or sertraline for 10 to 16 weeks of treatment . Using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression ( HAM-D ) sleep disturbance factor score , patients were categorized into low ( < 4 ) or high ( ≥4 ) baseline insomnia subgroups . Changes in depression and insomnia were assessed . Safety assessment s included treatment-emergent adverse events ( AEs ) , reasons for discontinuation , and AEs leading to discontinuation . In addition , AEs were evaluated within insomnia subgroups to determine emergence of activation or sedation . Depression improvement , assessed with the HAM-D-17 total score , was similar among treatments in all patients ( p = 0.365 ) and the high ( p = 0.853 ) and low insomnia ( p = 0.415 ) subgroups . Insomnia improvement , assessed with the HAM-D sleep disturbance factor score , was similar among treatments in all patients ( p = 0.868 ) and in the high ( p = 0.852 ) and low insomnia ( p = 0.982 ) subgroups . Analyses revealed no significant differences between treatments in the percentages of patients with substantial worsening , any worsening , worsening at endpoint , or improvement at endpoint in the HAM-D sleep disturbance factor in either insomnia subgroup . Treatments were well tolerated in most patients . No significant differences between treatments in the incidence of AEs suggestive of activation or sedation were seen in the insomnia subgroups . These data show no significant differences in acute treatment efficacy and tolerability across fluoxetine , sertraline , and paroxetine in major depressive disorder patients . Improvement in overall depression and in associated insomnia was achieved by most patients regardless of baseline insomnia
We found no clear evidence that paroxetine was more or less effective compared with other antidepressants at increasing response to treatment at acute ( six to 12 weeks ) , early ( one to four weeks ) , or longer term follow-up ( four to six months ) .
Paroxetine was associated with a lower rate of adverse events than amitriptyline , imipramine and older ADs as a class , but was less well tolerated than agomelatine and hypericum .
Some possibly clinical ly meaningful differences between paroxetine and other ADs exist , but no definitive conclusions can be drawn from these findings .
In terms of early response to treatment ( one to four weeks ) there was moderate quality of evidence that mirtazapine was better than paroxetine and that paroxetine was better than reboxetine .
However there was no clear evidence that paroxetine was better or worse compared with other antidepressants at increasing response to treatment at any time point .
BACKGROUND Paroxetine is the most potent inhibitor of the reuptake of serotonin of all selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors ( SSRIs ) and has been studied in many r and omised controlled trials ( RCTs ) .
However , these comparative studies provided contrasting findings and systematic review s of RCTs have always considered the SSRIs as a group , and evidence applicable to this group of drugs might not be applicable to paroxetine alone .
The present systematic review assessed the efficacy and tolerability profile of paroxetine in comparison with tricyclics ( TCAs ) , SSRIs and newer or non-conventional agents .
OBJECTIVES 1 .
To determine the efficacy of paroxetine in comparison with other anti-depressive agents in alleviating the acute symptoms of Major Depressive Disorder.2  .
To review acceptability of treatment with paroxetine in comparison with other anti-depressive agents.3 .
To investigate the adverse effects of paroxetine in comparison with other anti-depressive agents .