We observed the same finding when classes of antidepressants were compared with placebo .
When looking at dropouts due to adverse effects , which can be considered as a measure of tolerability , we found moderate- quality evidence showing that antidepressants as a whole are less well tolerated than placebo .
The identified studies comprehensively address the objectives of the present review .Based on these results , antidepressants may be more effective than placebo in treating panic disorder .
Antidepressants may also have benefit in comparison with placebo in terms of number of dropouts , but a less favourable profile in terms of dropout due to adverse effects .
However , the tolerability profile varied between different classes of antidepressants .
BACKGROUND Panic disorder is characterised by repeated , unexpected panic attacks , which represent a discrete period of fear or anxiety that has a rapid onset , reaches a peak within 10 minutes , and in which at least four of 13 characteristic symptoms are experienced , including racing heart , chest pain , sweating , shaking , dizziness , flushing , stomach churning , faintness and breathlessness .
It is common in the general population with a lifetime prevalence of 1 % to 4 % .
The treatment of panic disorder includes psychological and pharmacological interventions .
Amongst pharmacological agents , the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence ( NICE ) and the British Association for Psychopharmacology consider antidepressants , mainly selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors ( SSRIs ) , as the first-line treatment for panic disorder , due to their more favourable adverse effect profile over monoamine oxidase inhibitors ( MAOIs ) and tricyclic antidepressants ( TCAs ) .
Several classes of antidepressants have been studied and compared , but it is still unclear which antidepressants have a more or less favourable profile in terms of effectiveness and acceptability in the treatment of this condition .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of antidepressants for panic disorder in adults , specifically:1 .
to determine the efficacy of antidepressants in alleviating symptoms of panic disorder , with or without agoraphobia , in comparison to placebo;2 .
to review the acceptability of antidepressants  in panic disorder , with or without agoraphobia , in comparison with placebo ; and 3 .
to investigate the adverse effects of antidepressants  in panic disorder , with or without agoraphobia , including the general prevalence of adverse effects , compared to placebo .
Association of funding and conclusions in randomized drug trials: a reflection of treatment effect or adverse events?
CONTEXT Previous studies indicate that industry-sponsored trials tend to draw proindustry conclusions . OBJECTIVE To explore whether the association between funding and conclusions in r and omized drug trials reflects treatment effects or adverse events . DESIGN Observational study of 370 r and omized drug trials included in meta-analyses from Cochrane review s selected from the Cochrane Library , May 2001 . From a r and om sample of 167 Cochrane review s , 25 contained eligible meta-analyses ( assessed a binary outcome ; pooled at least 5 full-paper trials of which at least 1 reported adequate and 1 reported inadequate allocation concealment ) . The primary binary outcome from each meta- analysis was considered the primary outcome for all trials included in each meta- analysis . The association between funding and conclusions was analyzed by logistic regression with adjustment for treatment effect , adverse events , and additional confounding factors ( method ological quality , control intervention , sample size , publication year , and place of publication ) . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Conclusions in trials , classified into whether the experimental drug was recommended as the treatment of choice or not . RESULTS The experimental drug was recommended as treatment of choice in 16 % of trials funded by nonprofit organizations , 30 % of trials not reporting funding , 35 % of trials funded by both nonprofit and for-profit organizations , and 51 % of trials funded by for-profit organizations ( P<.001 ; chi2 test ) . Logistic regression analyses indicated that funding , treatment effect , and double blinding were the only significant predictors of conclusions . Adjusted analyses showed that trials funded by for-profit organizations were significantly more likely to recommend the experimental drug as treatment of choice ( odds ratio , 5.3 ; 95 % confidence interval , 2.0 - 14.4 ) compared with trials funded by nonprofit organizations . This association did not appear to reflect treatment effect or adverse events . CONCLUSIONS Conclusions in trials funded by for-profit organizations may be more positive due to biased interpretation of trial results . Readers should carefully evaluate whether conclusions in r and omized trials are supported by data
We observed the same finding when classes of antidepressants were compared with placebo .
When looking at dropouts due to adverse effects , which can be considered as a measure of tolerability , we found moderate- quality evidence showing that antidepressants as a whole are less well tolerated than placebo .
The identified studies comprehensively address the objectives of the present review .Based on these results , antidepressants may be more effective than placebo in treating panic disorder .
Antidepressants may also have benefit in comparison with placebo in terms of number of dropouts , but a less favourable profile in terms of dropout due to adverse effects .
However , the tolerability profile varied between different classes of antidepressants .
BACKGROUND Panic disorder is characterised by repeated , unexpected panic attacks , which represent a discrete period of fear or anxiety that has a rapid onset , reaches a peak within 10 minutes , and in which at least four of 13 characteristic symptoms are experienced , including racing heart , chest pain , sweating , shaking , dizziness , flushing , stomach churning , faintness and breathlessness .
It is common in the general population with a lifetime prevalence of 1 % to 4 % .
The treatment of panic disorder includes psychological and pharmacological interventions .
Amongst pharmacological agents , the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence ( NICE ) and the British Association for Psychopharmacology consider antidepressants , mainly selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors ( SSRIs ) , as the first-line treatment for panic disorder , due to their more favourable adverse effect profile over monoamine oxidase inhibitors ( MAOIs ) and tricyclic antidepressants ( TCAs ) .
Several classes of antidepressants have been studied and compared , but it is still unclear which antidepressants have a more or less favourable profile in terms of effectiveness and acceptability in the treatment of this condition .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of antidepressants for panic disorder in adults , specifically:1 .
to determine the efficacy of antidepressants in alleviating symptoms of panic disorder , with or without agoraphobia , in comparison to placebo;2 .
to review the acceptability of antidepressants  in panic disorder , with or without agoraphobia , in comparison with placebo ; and 3 .
to investigate the adverse effects of antidepressants  in panic disorder , with or without agoraphobia , including the general prevalence of adverse effects , compared to placebo .