Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
Physical Activity and Survival after Diagnosis of Invasive Breast Cancer
Previous studies suggest that increased physical activity may lower the risk of breast cancer incidence , but less is known about whether levels of physical activity after breast cancer diagnosis can influence survival . We prospect ively examined the relation between postdiagnosis recreational physical activity and risk of breast cancer death  in women who had a previous invasive breast cancer diagnosed between 1988 and 2001 ( at ages 20 - 79 years ) . All women completed a question naire on recent  postdiagnosis physical activity and other lifestyle factors . Among 4,482 women without history of recurrence at the time of completing the question naire , 109 died from breast cancer within 6 years of enrollment .  Physical activity was expressed as metabolic equivalent task-hours per week ( MET-h/wk ) ; hazard ratios ( HR ) and 95 % confidence intervals ( 95 % CI ) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression . After adjusting for age at diagnosis , stage of disease , state of residence , interval between diagnosis and physical activity assessment , body mass index , menopausal status , hormone therapy use , energy intake , education , family history of breast cancer , and treatment modality compared with women expending < 2.8 MET-h/wk in physical activity , women who engaged in greater levels of activity had a significantly lower risk of dying from breast cancer ( HR , 0.65 ; 95 % CI , 0.39 - 1.08 for 2.8 - 7.9 MET-h/wk ; HR , 0.59 ; 95 % CI , 0.35 - 1.01 for 8.0 - 20.9 MET-h/wk ; and HR , 0.51 ; 95 % CI , 0.29 - 0.89 for ≥21.0 MET-h/wk ; P for trend = 0.05 ) . Results were similar for overall survival ( HR , 0.44 ; 95 % CI , 0.32 - 0.60 for ≥21.0 versus < 2.8 MET-h/wk ; P for trend < 0.001 ) and were similar regardless of a woman ’s age , stage of disease , and body mass index . This study provides support for reduced overall mortality and mortality from breast cancer among women who engage in physical activity  after breast cancer diagnosis . ( Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008;17(2):379–86
Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?