Conclusions All interventions produced positive effects on BMD scanning and osteoporosis treatment rates post-fracture .
Despite sizeable increases , investigation and treatment rates remain sub-optimal .
Background There is a large quality of care gap for patients with osteoporosis .
As a fragility fracture is a strong indicator of underlying osteoporosis , it offers an ideal opportunity to initiate investigation and treatment .
However , studies of post-fracture population s document screening and treatment rates below 20 % in most setting s. This is despite the fact that bone mineral density ( BMD ) scans are effective at identifying patients at high risk of fracture , and effective drug treatments are widely available .
Effective interventions are required to remedy this incongruity in current practice .
Osteoporosis case manager for patients with hip fractures: results of a cost-effectiveness analysis conducted alongside a randomized trial.
BACKGROUND In a r and omized trial of patients with hip fractures , we previously demonstrated that a hospital-based case manager could increase rates of appropriate osteoporosis treatment to 51 % compared with 22 % for usual care ( P < .001 ) . Alongside that trial , we conducted an economic analysis . METHODS Patients with hip fractures were r and omized to usual care ( n = 110 ) or a case manager ( n = 110 ) and followed up for 1 year . Time-motion studies were used to determine intervention costs . From a third-party health care payer perspective and over the patient 's remaining lifetime , a Markov decision-analytic model was constructed to determine  cost-effectiveness  of the intervention compared with usual care .  Costs and benefits were discounted at 3 % and expressed in 2006 Canadian dollars . RESULTS The intervention cost CaD $ 56 per patient . Compared with usual care , the intervention strategy was dominant : for every 100 patients case managed , 6 fractures ( 4 hip fractures ) were prevented , 4 quality -adjusted life-years were gained , and CaD $ 260 000 was saved by the health care system . Irrespective of the number of patients case managed , the intervention reached a break-even threshold within 2 years . The intervention dominated usual care over the entire spectrum of 1-way sensitivity analyses and was cost-saving in 82 % of probabilistic model simulations . CONCLUSIONS Compared with usual care , we found that using a case manager for patients with hip fractures increased rates of appropriate osteoporosis treatment . The intervention dominated usual care , and the analysis suggests that systems implementing an intervention similar to ours should expect to see a reduction in fractures , gains in life expectancy , and substantial cost savings . TRIAL REGISTRATION clinical trials.gov Identifier : NCT00175175
Conclusions All interventions produced positive effects on BMD scanning and osteoporosis treatment rates post-fracture .
Despite sizeable increases , investigation and treatment rates remain sub-optimal .
Background There is a large quality of care gap for patients with osteoporosis .
As a fragility fracture is a strong indicator of underlying osteoporosis , it offers an ideal opportunity to initiate investigation and treatment .
However , studies of post-fracture population s document screening and treatment rates below 20 % in most setting s. This is despite the fact that bone mineral density ( BMD ) scans are effective at identifying patients at high risk of fracture , and effective drug treatments are widely available .
Effective interventions are required to remedy this incongruity in current practice .