Consistent evidence was found for the predictive value of pain intensity ( more pain-- > worse outcome ) , several work-related parameters ( e.g. , high satisfaction-- > better outcome ) , and coping style ( less active coping-- > better outcome ) .
Other sociodemographic and physical variables consistently lacked predictive value .
No consistent evidence was found for other psychological variables .
CONCLUSIONS It is impossible to define a generic set of predictors of outcome of multidisciplinary rehabilitation and back schools for patients with chronic low back pain because the review ed studies were descriptive or exploratory in nature , and most predictors were only studied once .
Nevertheless , for several predictors , consistent evidence was found .
OBJECTIVE To determine predictors of outcome of multidisciplinary rehabilitation-or back school treatment  for patients with chronic low back pain .
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Numerous review s have been performed to gain insight into which patients benefit from which treatment .
However , no review has systematic ally focused on predictors from multiple domains ( i.e. , sociodemographic , physical , and psychological ) , or on treatment outcome measured as activity limitation or participation restriction .
The Centralization Phenomenon: Its Usefulness as a Predictor of Outcome in Conservative Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain (A Pilot Study)
Study Design Two-hundred-forty-three patients with chronic low back pain were studied in a prospect i ve comparative survey to determine whether the “ central ization phenomenon ” was associated with outcome after an interdisciplinary work-hardning program . Objective The hypothesis was that patients who demonstrated central ization during initial mechanical assessment would have better outcomes than non central izers . Summary of Background Data Overall subjects had decreased pain intensity ratings ( mean 10 % ) , increased lifting ability ( 6–8 kg ) , and a 59.2 % return-to-work rate at a mean of 9.7 months follow-up . Methods . Patients were classified as either central izers or non central izer  , based on results of their initial assessment , changes in pain ratings , one-time maximal weights lifted , Oswestry scores , and returen-to-work status were compared between groups . Results The central izers reported significant decreases in their maximum pain ratings ( central izers , 16 % non central izers , 6 % ) and had higher return-to-work rate ( central izers , 68 % ; non central izers , 52 % ) than the non central izers . Conclusion . Centrelization can help identify subgroups within the population with chronic low back pain and could be a useful goal setting and case management toll in the rehabilitation of low back pain
Consistent evidence was found for the predictive value of pain intensity ( more pain-- > worse outcome ) , several work-related parameters ( e.g. , high satisfaction-- > better outcome ) , and coping style ( less active coping-- > better outcome ) .
Other sociodemographic and physical variables consistently lacked predictive value .
No consistent evidence was found for other psychological variables .
CONCLUSIONS It is impossible to define a generic set of predictors of outcome of multidisciplinary rehabilitation and back schools for patients with chronic low back pain because the review ed studies were descriptive or exploratory in nature , and most predictors were only studied once .
Nevertheless , for several predictors , consistent evidence was found .
OBJECTIVE To determine predictors of outcome of multidisciplinary rehabilitation-or back school treatment  for patients with chronic low back pain .
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Numerous review s have been performed to gain insight into which patients benefit from which treatment .
However , no review has systematic ally focused on predictors from multiple domains ( i.e. , sociodemographic , physical , and psychological ) , or on treatment outcome measured as activity limitation or participation restriction .