Reduced protocol compliance was the most frequently identified modifiable predictive factor for adverse LOS , morbidity and readmission .
Conclusion Protocol compliance is the most frequently reported predictive factor for outcomes of ERAS programmes following laparoscopic colorectal resection .
Reduced compliance increases LOS , morbidity and readmission to hospital .
The impact of compliance with individual ERAS protocol elements is insufficiently studied , and the lack of a st and ardised framework for evaluating ERAS programmes makes it difficult to draw definite conclusions about which factors exert the greatest impact on outcome after laparoscopic colorectal resection
Objective To perform a systematic review of published literature for the factors reported to predict outcomes of enhanced recovery after surgery ( ERAS ) programmes following  laparoscopic colorectal surgery .
Background ERAS programmes and the use of laparoscopy have been widely adopted in colorectal surgery bringing short-term patient benefit .
However , there is a minority of patients that do not benefit from these strategies and their identification is not well characterised .
The factors that underpin outcomes from ERAS programmes for laparoscopic patients are not understood .
Efficacy of transversus abdominis plane blocks in laparoscopic colorectal resections
Background The increasing use of laparoscopic techniques for colorectal resections means that the issue of postoperative analgesia needs to be reassessed . This nonr and omized comparative study aim ed to assess the efficacy of the transversus abdominis plane ( TAP ) block in laparoscopic colorectal resections . Methods Prospect ively collected data from consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resections were used . Analgesia usage and outcome data for patients who had a TAP block and a postoperative morphine patient-controlled analgesia pump ( PCA ) were compared with those for patients who had a PCA alone . Results Data for 74 patients were used in the final analysis ( 40 TAP/PCA and 34 PCA alone ) . There was a significant reduction in overall intravenous opiate use in the TAP/PCA group ( 31.3 vs. 51.8 mg ; P = 0.03 ) . The TAP/PCA group showed a slight trend toward a shorter hospital stay ( 3 vs. 4 days ; P = 0.17 ) but no difference in postoperative complications or any other outcome measure . There was no procedure-related morbidity relating to the use of TAP blocks . Conclusions It appears that TAP blocks reduce postoperative analgesia use of patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resections within an enhanced recovery program , and this may have an impact on their postoperative hospital length of stay
Reduced protocol compliance was the most frequently identified modifiable predictive factor for adverse LOS , morbidity and readmission .
Conclusion Protocol compliance is the most frequently reported predictive factor for outcomes of ERAS programmes following laparoscopic colorectal resection .
Reduced compliance increases LOS , morbidity and readmission to hospital .
The impact of compliance with individual ERAS protocol elements is insufficiently studied , and the lack of a st and ardised framework for evaluating ERAS programmes makes it difficult to draw definite conclusions about which factors exert the greatest impact on outcome after laparoscopic colorectal resection
Objective To perform a systematic review of published literature for the factors reported to predict outcomes of enhanced recovery after surgery ( ERAS ) programmes following  laparoscopic colorectal surgery .
Background ERAS programmes and the use of laparoscopy have been widely adopted in colorectal surgery bringing short-term patient benefit .
However , there is a minority of patients that do not benefit from these strategies and their identification is not well characterised .
The factors that underpin outcomes from ERAS programmes for laparoscopic patients are not understood .