Where data were available , the relative benefits seen held true both after a single or multiple procedure(s ) .
For patients with persistent atrial fibrillation , CA achieves significantly greater freedom from recurrent atrial fibrillation compared with medical therapy .
BACKGROUND Catheter ablation ( CA ) is commonly performed for persistent atrial fibrillation , but few high- quality r and omized controlled trials ( RCTs ) exist , leading to funding restrictions being proposed in several countries .
We performed a r and om-effects meta- analysis of RCTs and non- RCTs to assess the efficacy of CA for persistent atrial fibrillation .
Complex fractionated atrial electrogram or linear ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation--a prospective randomized study.
BACKGROUND Catheter ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms ( CFAE ) for persistent atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is a promising treatment strategy . We tested the hypothesis that CFAE ablation is superior to linear ablation in patients with persistent or long-st and ing persistent AF . METHODS In this study , 116 patients with persistent AF were r and omly assigned to undergo circumferential PVI plus additional lines ( linear ablation group ; 59 patients ) or CFAE ablation plus ostial pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) ( spot ablation group ; 57 patients ) . Primary endpoint was freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia after a single ablation procedure ( clinical and repeat 7-day Holter ) , 12 months after ablation without antiarrhythmic medication . RESULTS The primary endpoint was reached in 22 of 59 ( 37 % ) patients of the linear ablation group and in 22 of 57 ( 39 % ) patients of the spot ablation group ( P = 0.9 ) . Freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias , including reablations , was achieved in 54 % of patients ( linear ablation group ) versus 56 % of patients ( spot ablation group ; P = 0.8 ) . The incidence of recurrent persistent AF was higher after linear ablation than after spot ablation ( 21/37 vs 11/35 patients ; P = 0.03 ) ; atrial tachycardia ( AT ) was seen more often after spot ablation ( 10/35 vs 4/37 patients ; P = 0.03 ) . CONCLUSION In patients with persistent AF , CFAE ablation plus PVI reaches the same results as circumferential PVI plus lines , in terms of freedom from symptomatic atrial tachyarrhythmias within the first year after a single ablation procedure . Arrhythmia recurrences in patients after spot ablation were caused more often by AT , whereas recurrent persistent AF was more prevalent after the linear ablation approach
Where data were available , the relative benefits seen held true both after a single or multiple procedure(s ) .
For patients with persistent atrial fibrillation , CA achieves significantly greater freedom from recurrent atrial fibrillation compared with medical therapy .
BACKGROUND Catheter ablation ( CA ) is commonly performed for persistent atrial fibrillation , but few high- quality r and omized controlled trials ( RCTs ) exist , leading to funding restrictions being proposed in several countries .
We performed a r and om-effects meta- analysis of RCTs and non- RCTs to assess the efficacy of CA for persistent atrial fibrillation .