Stemless anatomic TSA result ed in similar functional outcomes and complication rates to stemmed TSA with decreased operative time and lower blood loss .
BACKGROUND Stemless anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty ( TSA ) is used in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the shoulder joint and other degenerative shoulder diseases .
It has several proposed advantages over stemmed TSA including increased bone preservation , decreased operative time , and easier removal at revision .
Outcomes after shoulder replacement: comparison between reverse and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.
BACKGROUND Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty ( TSA ) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty ( RTSA ) are increasingly common procedures employed to treat arthritic conditions . Although TSA is a widely accepted procedure for glenohumeral arthritis with intact rotator cuff , concerns about RTSA persist because of variable complication rates and outcomes . METHODS This is a prospect i ve , case-control study comparing outcomes and complications after TSA and RTSA . The study included 47 patients undergoing TSA for glenohumeral arthritis and 53 patients undergoing RTSA for rotator cuff tear arthropathy . Average clinical follow-up was more than 2 years in both groups . Major complications included infection , periprosthetic fracture , instability , glenoid loosening , and need for revision surgery . Patient outcome measures included the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score , pain visual analog scale score , and goniometer-measured range of motion . Plain radiographs were review ed to assess for degree of glenoid lucency in TSA and scapular notching in RTSA . RESULTS At 2 years , there were no differences in rate of major complications  ( TSA , 15 % ; RTSA , 13 % ; P = .808 ) or revision surgeries  ( TSA , 11 % ; RTSA , 9 % ) . Outcomes assessed by the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score and visual analog scale were also similar between the 2 groups . TSA patients had greater external rotation than RTSA patients did ( 53 ° vs 38 ° ; P = .001 ) . Otherwise , forward flexion , abduction , and internal rotation were comparable in range of motion . CONCLUSIONS TSA and RTSA  have similar complication rates , need for revision , patient-reported outcomes , and range of motion at 2 years of follow-up . The use of side-by-side cohorts in this study allows st and ardized comparison between these 2 shoulder arthroplasty procedures
Stemless anatomic TSA result ed in similar functional outcomes and complication rates to stemmed TSA with decreased operative time and lower blood loss .
BACKGROUND Stemless anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty ( TSA ) is used in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the shoulder joint and other degenerative shoulder diseases .
It has several proposed advantages over stemmed TSA including increased bone preservation , decreased operative time , and easier removal at revision .