The 12 remaining studies across all musculoskeletal conditions showed little or no improvement in GP behaviour and patient outcomes .The direction of the targeted behaviour ( i.e. increasing or decreasing a behaviour ) does not seem to affect the effectiveness of an intervention .
There is good- quality evidence that a GP alerting system with or without patient-directed education on osteoporosis improves guideline -consistent GP behaviour , result ing in better diagnosis and treatment rates .
Interventions such as GP reminder messages and GP feedback on performance combined with guideline dissemination may lead to small improvements in guideline -consistent GP behaviour with regard to low back pain , while GP education on osteoarthritis pain and the use of educationally influential physicians may lead to slight improvement in patient outcomes and guideline -consistent behaviour respectively .
BACKGROUND Musculoskeletal conditions require particular management skills .
Identification of interventions which are effective in equipping general practitioners ( GPs ) with such necessary skills could translate to improved health outcomes for patients and reduced healthcare and societal costs .
OBJECTIVES To determine the effectiveness of professional interventions for GPs  that aim to improve the management of musculoskeletal conditions in primary care .
We investigated whether the direction of the targeted behavioural change affects the effectiveness of interventions .
Osteoporosis improvement: a large-scale randomized controlled trial of patient and primary care physician education.
UNLABELLED We conducted a r and omized controlled trial within the setting of a large drug benefit plan for Medicare beneficiaries . Primary care physicians and their patients were r and omized to usual care , patient intervention only , physician intervention only , or both interventions . There was no difference in the probability of the primary composite endpoint ( BMD test or osteoporosis medication ) or in either of its components comparing the combined intervention group with usual care ( risk ratio = 1.04 ; 95 % CI , 0.85 - 1.26 ) . INTRODUCTION Fractures from osteoporosis are associated with substantial morbidity , mortality , and cost . However , only a minority of at-risk older adults receives screening and /or treatment for this condition . We evaluated the effect of educational interventions for osteoporosis targeting at-risk patients , primary care physicians , or both . MATERIAL S AND METHODS We conducted a r and omized controlled trial within the setting of a large drug benefit plan for Medicare beneficiaries . Primary care physicians and their patients were r and omized to usual care , patient intervention only , physician intervention only , or both interventions .  The at-risk patients were women > or=65 yr of age , men and women > or=65 yr of age with a prior fracture , and men and women > or=65 yr of age who used oral glucocorticoids .  The primary outcome studied was a composite of either undergoing a BMD test or initiating a medication used for osteoporosis . The secondary outcome was a hip , humerus , spine , or wrist fracture . RESULTS We r and omized 828 primary care physicians and their 13,455 eligible at-risk patients into four study arms . Physician and patient characteristics were very similar across all four groups . Across all four groups , the rate of the composite outcome was 10.3 per 100 person-years and did not differ between the usual care and the combined intervention groups ( p = 0.5 ) . In adjusted Cox proportional hazards models , there was no difference in the probability of the primary composite endpoint comparing the combined intervention group with usual care ( risk ratio = 1.04 ; 95 % CI , 0.85 - 1.26 ) . There was also no difference in either of the components of the composite endpoint . The probability of fracture during follow-up was 4.2 per 100 person-years and did not differ by treatment assignment ( p = 0.9 ) . CONCLUSIONS In this trial , a relatively brief program of patient and /or physician education did not work to improve the management of osteoporosis . More intensive efforts should be considered for future quality improvement programs for osteoporosis
The 12 remaining studies across all musculoskeletal conditions showed little or no improvement in GP behaviour and patient outcomes .The direction of the targeted behaviour ( i.e. increasing or decreasing a behaviour ) does not seem to affect the effectiveness of an intervention .
There is good- quality evidence that a GP alerting system with or without patient-directed education on osteoporosis improves guideline -consistent GP behaviour , result ing in better diagnosis and treatment rates .
Interventions such as GP reminder messages and GP feedback on performance combined with guideline dissemination may lead to small improvements in guideline -consistent GP behaviour with regard to low back pain , while GP education on osteoarthritis pain and the use of educationally influential physicians may lead to slight improvement in patient outcomes and guideline -consistent behaviour respectively .
BACKGROUND Musculoskeletal conditions require particular management skills .
Identification of interventions which are effective in equipping general practitioners ( GPs ) with such necessary skills could translate to improved health outcomes for patients and reduced healthcare and societal costs .
OBJECTIVES To determine the effectiveness of professional interventions for GPs  that aim to improve the management of musculoskeletal conditions in primary care .
We investigated whether the direction of the targeted behavioural change affects the effectiveness of interventions .