SET was still beneficial for maximal and pain-free walking distances at 12 months , but it did not have a significant effect on quality of life parameters .
AUTHORS ' CONCLUSIONS SET has statistically significant benefit on treadmill walking distance ( maximal and pain-free ) compared with non-supervised regimens .
BACKGROUND Although supervised exercise therapy is considered to be of significant benefit for people with leg pain ( peripheral arterial disease ( PAD ) ) , implementing supervised exercise programs ( SETs ) in daily practice has limitations .
This is an up date of a review first published in 2006 .
OBJECTIVES The main objective of this review was to provide an accurate overview of studies evaluating the effects of supervised versus non-supervised exercise therapy on maximal walking time or distance on a treadmill for people with intermittent claudication .
Supervised exercise therapy for intermittent claudication in daily practice.
OBJECTIVE This study describes the results and functioning of community-based supervised exercise therapy ( SET ) at one year of follow-up . METHODS We conducted a prospect i ve cohort study of community-based SET in regional physiotherapeutic practice s. Consecutive patients with intermittent claudication referred for community-based SET were included . Exclusion criteria for SET were pain at rest or tissue loss . All patients received a diagnostic workup consisting of an ankle-brachial index at rest and after exercise . Interventions were exercise therapy according to the guidelines of the Royal Dutch Society for Physiotherapy . The primary outcome measurement was the increase in absolute claudication distance ( ACD ) , assessed using a st and ardized treadmill protocol by a physiotherapist at baseline and at four , 12 , 26 , and 52 weeks of SET . RESULTS From January 2005 through September 2006 , 349 patients were referred by vascular surgeons for community-based SET . A total of 272 patients with intermittent claudication began the program . Of the 349 initially referred patients , 52 could not perform a st and ard treadmill test but did start community-based SET at a lower level , and 25 patients never started the program . At one year , 129 of the original 272 patients who began community-based SET  ( 47.4 % ) were available for analysis of walking distance . In the interim , 143 patients discontinued the program for the following reasons : satisfaction with the acquired walking distance ( n = 19 ) ; unsatisfying results ( n = 26 ) ; not motivated ( n = 22 ) ; (non)vascular intercurrent disease ( n = 48 ) ; and other reasons ( n = 28 ) . ACD increased significantly from a median of 400 m at baseline to 1100 m after 12 months of follow-up ( P < .001 ) , corresponding to a median increase of 107.8 % . CONCLUSION Community-based SET seems as effective as SET in a hospital-based approach in improving walking distance , however , it has a high dropout rate
SET was still beneficial for maximal and pain-free walking distances at 12 months , but it did not have a significant effect on quality of life parameters .
AUTHORS ' CONCLUSIONS SET has statistically significant benefit on treadmill walking distance ( maximal and pain-free ) compared with non-supervised regimens .
BACKGROUND Although supervised exercise therapy is considered to be of significant benefit for people with leg pain ( peripheral arterial disease ( PAD ) ) , implementing supervised exercise programs ( SETs ) in daily practice has limitations .
This is an up date of a review first published in 2006 .
OBJECTIVES The main objective of this review was to provide an accurate overview of studies evaluating the effects of supervised versus non-supervised exercise therapy on maximal walking time or distance on a treadmill for people with intermittent claudication .