Strong evidence was found for a decrease in operative time and intraoperative blood loss for MIS THA , with no difference in complication rates and risk for acetabular outliers .
Strong evidence exists that there is no difference in physical functioning , measured either by question naires or by gait analysis .
Moderate evidence was found for a shorter length of hospital stay after MIS THA .
Conflicting evidence was found for a positive effect of MIS THA on pain in the early postoperative period , but that effect diminished after three months postoperatively .
Strong evidence was found for an increase in operative time for CAS THA , and limited evidence was found for a decrease in intraoperative blood loss .
Furthermore , strong evidence was found for no difference in complication rates , as well as for a significantly lower risk for acetabular outliers .
Conclusions The results indicate that MIS THA is a safe surgical procedure , without increases in operative time , blood loss , operative complication rates and component malposition rates .
However , the beneficial effect of MIS THA on functional recovery has to be proven .
The results also indicate that CAS THA , though result ing in an increase in operative time , may have a positive effect on operative blood loss and operative complication rates .
More importantly , the use of CAS results in better positioning of acetabular component of the prosthesis
Background Both minimally invasive surgery ( MIS ) and computer-assisted surgery ( CAS ) for total hip arthroplasty ( THA ) have gained popularity in recent years .
We conducted a qualitative and systematic review to assess the effectiveness of MIS , CAS and computer-assisted MIS for THA .
Image Guided Navigation System to Measure Intraoperatively Acetabular Implant Alignment
There has been little clinical research to examine the effects of patient positioning and pelvic motion on the alignment of the acetabular implant during total hip replacement surgery . Until now , no tools were capable of accurately measuring these variables during the actual procedure . As part of a broader program in medical robotics and computer assisted surgery , a clinical system has been developed that includes several enabling technologies . The hip navigation system ( HipNav ) continuously and precisely measures pelvic location and tracks relative implant alignment intraoperatively . HipNav technology is used to gauge current clinical practice and provide intraoperative feedback to surgeons with the goal of improving the precision and accuracy of acetabular alignment during total hip replacement . This system provides surgeons with a new class of image guided measurement tools and assist devices . These tools successfully were introduced into the clinical practice of surgery with results showing the following : ( 1 ) There exist unpredictable and large variations in the initial position of patients ' pelves on the operating room table and significant pelvic movement during surgery and during intraoperative range of motion testing ; ( 2 ) current mechanical acetabular alignment guides do not account for these variations , and result in variable and in the majority of cases unacceptable acetabular alignment ; and ( 3 ) press fitting oversized acetabular components influences the final cup orientation
Strong evidence was found for a decrease in operative time and intraoperative blood loss for MIS THA , with no difference in complication rates and risk for acetabular outliers .
Strong evidence exists that there is no difference in physical functioning , measured either by question naires or by gait analysis .
Moderate evidence was found for a shorter length of hospital stay after MIS THA .
Conflicting evidence was found for a positive effect of MIS THA on pain in the early postoperative period , but that effect diminished after three months postoperatively .
Strong evidence was found for an increase in operative time for CAS THA , and limited evidence was found for a decrease in intraoperative blood loss .
Furthermore , strong evidence was found for no difference in complication rates , as well as for a significantly lower risk for acetabular outliers .
Conclusions The results indicate that MIS THA is a safe surgical procedure , without increases in operative time , blood loss , operative complication rates and component malposition rates .
However , the beneficial effect of MIS THA on functional recovery has to be proven .
The results also indicate that CAS THA , though result ing in an increase in operative time , may have a positive effect on operative blood loss and operative complication rates .
More importantly , the use of CAS results in better positioning of acetabular component of the prosthesis
Background Both minimally invasive surgery ( MIS ) and computer-assisted surgery ( CAS ) for total hip arthroplasty ( THA ) have gained popularity in recent years .
We conducted a qualitative and systematic review to assess the effectiveness of MIS , CAS and computer-assisted MIS for THA .