Although a variety of pain and physical functioning outcome measures have been reported in the literature , few have demonstrate method ologically strong psychometric properties .
INTRODUCTION A range of outcome measures across various domains are used to evaluate change following an intervention in clinical trials on chronic neuropathic pain ( NeP ) .
However , to capture a real change in the variable of interest , the psychometric properties of a particular measure should demonstrate appropriate method ological quality .
Various outcome measures in the domains of pain and physical functioning have been used in the literature for NeP , for which individual properties ( eg , reliability/validity ) have been reported .
WHICH QUESTIONNAIRE IS BEST? THE RELIABILITY, VALIDITY AND EASE OF USE OF THE PATIENT EVALUATION MEASURE, THE DISABILITIES OF THE ARM, SHOULDER AND HAND AND THE MICHIGAN HAND OUTCOME MEASURE
The  Patient Evaluation Measure ( PEM ) , The  Michigan H and Outcome Question naire ( MHQ )  and the Disabilities of the Arm , Shoulder and H and ( DASH ) score were assessed independent of their originators for reliability , construct and criterion validity and acceptability , using an ease of use question naire . These were administered in r and om order to 100 patients with different h and and wrist disorders and with different impairments of movement , pain , sensation and strength . The internal consistency of all three question naires was very high suggesting redundancy in the questions . All question naires were reproducible and valid for finger and wrist disorders , but less for nerve disorders . All had poor construct validity . The PEM was the easiest to underst and and complete , taking the least time . Correlation between the scales is high and conversion equations were calculated . All three are reliable and reproducible patient completed question naires , but the PEM is the easiest to use . The validity of all is suspected for nerve disorders
Although a variety of pain and physical functioning outcome measures have been reported in the literature , few have demonstrate method ologically strong psychometric properties .
INTRODUCTION A range of outcome measures across various domains are used to evaluate change following an intervention in clinical trials on chronic neuropathic pain ( NeP ) .
However , to capture a real change in the variable of interest , the psychometric properties of a particular measure should demonstrate appropriate method ological quality .
Various outcome measures in the domains of pain and physical functioning have been used in the literature for NeP , for which individual properties ( eg , reliability/validity ) have been reported .