Surrogate outcomes showed a similar benefit favoring CA .
Conclusion and Relevance Catheter ablation for AF in HFrEF is associated with improvement in patient-centered outcomes and surrogate outcomes when compared to st and ard medical therapy with or without device therapy
Background Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) among patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction ( HFrEF ) is associated with adverse clinical outcomes .
Our primary aim was to evaluate patient-centered outcomes and surrogate outcomes following catheter ablation ( CA ) of AF among patients with HFrEF compared to st and ard medical therapy with or without device therapy ( atrioventricular node ablation and cardiac resynchronization therapy ) .
Catheter Ablation Versus Medical Rate Control in Atrial Fibrillation and Systolic Dysfunction: The CAMERA-MRI Study.
BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) and left ventricular systolic dysfunction ( LVSD ) frequently co-exist despite adequate rate control . Existing r and omized studies of AF and LVSD of varying etiologies have reported modest benefits with a rhythm control strategy . OBJECTIVES The goal of this study was to determine whether catheter ablation ( CA ) for AF could improve LVSD compared with medical rate control ( MRC ) where the etiology of the LVSD was unexplained , apart from the presence of AF . METHODS This multicenter , r and omized clinical trial enrolled patients with persistent AF and idiopathic cardiomyopathy ( left ventricular ejection fraction [ LVEF ] ≤45 % ) . After optimization of rate control , patients underwent cardiac magnetic resonance ( CMR ) to assess LVEF and late gadolinium enhancement , indicative of ventricular fibrosis , before r and omization to either CA or ongoing MRC . CA included pulmonary vein isolation and posterior wall isolation . AF burden post-CA was assessed by using an implanted loop recorder , and adequacy of MRC was assessed by using serial Holter monitoring . The primary endpoint was change in LVEF on repeat CMR at 6 months . RESULTS A total of 301 patients were screened ; 68 patients were enrolled between November 2013 and October 2016 and r and omized with 33 in each arm ( accounting for 2 dropouts ) .  The average AF burden post-CA was 1.6 ± 5.0 % at 6 months . In the intention-to-treat analysis , absolute LVEF improved by 18 ± 13 % in the CA group compared with 4.4 ± 13 % in the MRC group ( p < 0.0001 ) and normalized ( LVEF ≥50 % ) in 58 % versus 9 % ( p = 0.0002 ) . In those undergoing CA , the absence of late gadolinium enhancement predicted greater improvements in absolute LVEF ( 10.7 % ; p = 0.0069 ) and normalization at 6 months ( 73 % vs. 29 % ; p = 0.0093 ) . CONCLUSIONS AF is an underappreciated reversible cause of LVSD in this population despite adequate rate control . The restoration of sinus rhythm with CA results in significant improvements in ventricular function , particularly in the absence of ventricular fibrosis on CMR . This outcome challenges the current treatment paradigm that rate control is the appropriate strategy in patients with AF and LVSD . ( Catheter Ablation Versus Medical Rate Control in Atrial Fibrillation and Systolic Dysfunction [ CAMERA-MRI ] ; ACTRN12613000880741 )
Surrogate outcomes showed a similar benefit favoring CA .
Conclusion and Relevance Catheter ablation for AF in HFrEF is associated with improvement in patient-centered outcomes and surrogate outcomes when compared to st and ard medical therapy with or without device therapy
Background Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) among patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction ( HFrEF ) is associated with adverse clinical outcomes .
Our primary aim was to evaluate patient-centered outcomes and surrogate outcomes following catheter ablation ( CA ) of AF among patients with HFrEF compared to st and ard medical therapy with or without device therapy ( atrioventricular node ablation and cardiac resynchronization therapy ) .