We found high quality evidence that hormone therapy in both primary and secondary prevention conferred no protective effects for all-cause mortality , cardiovascular death , non-fatal myocardial infa rct ion , angina , or revascularisation .
There was no strong evidence of effect on risk of stroke in this group .
Our review findings provide strong evidence that treatment with hormone therapy in post-menopausal women overall , for either primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease events has little if any benefit and causes an increase in the risk of stroke and venous thromboembolic events
BACKGROUND Evidence from systematic review s of observational studies suggests that hormone therapy may have beneficial effects in reducing the incidence of cardiovascular disease events in post-menopausal women , however the results of r and omised controlled trials ( RCTs ) have had mixed results .
This is an up date d version of a Cochrane review published in 2013 .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of hormone therapy for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in post-menopausal women , and whether there are differential effects between use in primary or secondary prevention .
Secondary aims were to undertake exploratory analyses to ( i ) assess the impact of time since menopause that treatment was commenced ( ≥ 10 years versus < 10 years ) , and where these data were not available , use age of trial participants at baseline as a proxy ( ≥ 60 years of age versus < 60 years of age ) ; and ( ii ) assess the effects of length of time on treatment .
Health related quality of life after combined hormone replacement therapy: randomised controlled trial
Objective To assess the effect of  combined hormone replacement therapy ( HRT )  on health related quality of life . Design R and omised placebo controlled double blind trial . Setting General practice s in United Kingdom ( 384 ) , Australia ( 94 ) , and New Zeal and ( 24 ) . Participants Postmenopausal women aged 50 - 69 at r and omisation ; 3721 women with a uterus were r and omised to combined oestrogen and progestogen  ( n=1862 ) or placebo  ( n=1859 ) . Data on health related quality of life at one year were available from 1043 and 1087 women , respectively . Interventions Conjugated equine oestrogen 0.625 mg plus medroxyprogesterone acetate 2.5/5.0 mg or matched placebo orally daily for one year . Main outcome measures Health related quality of life and psychological wellbeing as measured by the women ’s health question naire . Changes in emotional and physical menopausal symptoms as measured by a symptoms question naire and depression by the Centre for Epidemiological Studies depression scale ( CES-D ) . Overall health related quality of life and overall quality of life as measured by the European quality of life instrument ( EuroQol ) and visual analogue scale , respectively . Results After one year small but significant improvements were observed in three of nine components of the women ’s health question naire for those taking combined HRT compared with those taking placebo :  vasomotor symptoms ( P<0.001 ) , sexual functioning ( P<0.001 ) , and sleep problems ( P<0.001 ) . Significantly fewer women in the combined HRT group reported hot flushes ( P<0.001 ) , night sweats ( P<0.001 ) , aching joints and muscles ( P=0.001 ) , insomnia ( P<0.001 ) , and vaginal dryness ( P<0.001 ) than in the placebo group , but greater proportions reported breast tenderness ( P<0.001 ) or vaginal discharge ( P<0.001 ) . Hot flushes were experienced in the combined HRT and placebo groups by 30 % and 29 % at trial entry and 9 % and 25 % at one year , respectively . No significant differences in other menopausal symptoms , depression , or overall quality of life were observed at one year . Conclusions Combined HRT started many years after the menopause can improve health related quality of life . Trial registration IS RCT N 63718836
We found high quality evidence that hormone therapy in both primary and secondary prevention conferred no protective effects for all-cause mortality , cardiovascular death , non-fatal myocardial infa rct ion , angina , or revascularisation .
There was no strong evidence of effect on risk of stroke in this group .
Our review findings provide strong evidence that treatment with hormone therapy in post-menopausal women overall , for either primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease events has little if any benefit and causes an increase in the risk of stroke and venous thromboembolic events
BACKGROUND Evidence from systematic review s of observational studies suggests that hormone therapy may have beneficial effects in reducing the incidence of cardiovascular disease events in post-menopausal women , however the results of r and omised controlled trials ( RCTs ) have had mixed results .
This is an up date d version of a Cochrane review published in 2013 .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of hormone therapy for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in post-menopausal women , and whether there are differential effects between use in primary or secondary prevention .
Secondary aims were to undertake exploratory analyses to ( i ) assess the impact of time since menopause that treatment was commenced ( ≥ 10 years versus < 10 years ) , and where these data were not available , use age of trial participants at baseline as a proxy ( ≥ 60 years of age versus < 60 years of age ) ; and ( ii ) assess the effects of length of time on treatment .