Synbiotics failed to significantly increase growth in boys and girls .
Use of synbiotics increased stool frequency , had no impact on stool consistency , colic , spitting up / regurgitation , crying , restlessness or vomiting .
Probiotics in formula also failed to have any significant effect on growth , stool frequency or consistency .
Probiotics did not lower the incidence of diarrhoea , colic , spitting up / regurgitation , crying , restlessness or vomiting .
Prebiotics in formula did increase weight gain but had no impact on length or head circumference gain .
Prebiotics increased stool frequency but had no impact on stool consistency , the incidence of colic , spitting up / regurgitation , crying , restlessness or vomiting .
There was no impact of prebiotics on the volume of formula tolerated , infections and gastrointestinal microflora .
Authors ’ conclusions There is not enough evidence to state that supplementation of term infant formula with synbiotics , probiotics or prebiotics does result in improved growth or clinical outcomes in term infants .
There is no data available to establish if synbiotics are superior to probiotics or prebiotics
Background Synbiotics , probiotics or prebiotics are being added to infant formula to promote growth and development in infants .
Previous review s ( 2007 to 2011 ) on term infants given probiotics or prebiotics focused on prevention of allergic disease and food hypersensitivity .
This review focused on growth and clinical outcomes in term infants fed only infant formula containing synbiotics , probiotics or prebiotics .
Safety of supplementing infant formula with long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids and Bifidobacterium lactis in term infants: a randomised controlled trial.
Probiotics and long-chain PUFA ( LC-PUFA ) may be beneficial supplements for infants who are not breast-fed . The aim of the present study is to evaluate the safety of an infant formula containing the LC-PUFA DHA and arachidonic acid ( AA ) and the probiotic Bifidobacterium lactis by comparing the growth rate of infants fed the supplemented and unsupplemented formulas . One hundred and forty-two healthy , term infants were enrolled in a single-centre , r and omised , double-blind , controlled , parallel-group trial , and allocated to receive either st and ard or probiotic and LC-PUFA-containing experimental formulas . The infants were fed with their assigned formulas for 7 months . The primary outcome ( weight gain ) and the secondary outcomes ( length , head circumference and formula tolerance ) were measured throughout the study . LC-PUFA status was assessed at 4 months of age and immune response to childhood vaccines was measured at 7 months of age . There was no significant difference in growth between the two groups . The 90 % CI for the difference in mean weight gain was - 0.08 , 3.1 g in the intention-to-treat population and 0.1 - 3.8 g in the per protocol population , which lay within the predefined boundaries of equivalence , - 3.9 - 3.9 . There were no significant differences in mean length and head circumference . DHA and AA concentrations were higher in infants in the experimental formula group compared with the control formula group . No influence of the supplements on the response to vaccines was observed . Growth characteristics of term infants fed the starter formula containing a probiotic and LC-PUFA were similar to st and ard formula-fed infants
Synbiotics failed to significantly increase growth in boys and girls .
Use of synbiotics increased stool frequency , had no impact on stool consistency , colic , spitting up / regurgitation , crying , restlessness or vomiting .
Probiotics in formula also failed to have any significant effect on growth , stool frequency or consistency .
Probiotics did not lower the incidence of diarrhoea , colic , spitting up / regurgitation , crying , restlessness or vomiting .
Prebiotics in formula did increase weight gain but had no impact on length or head circumference gain .
Prebiotics increased stool frequency but had no impact on stool consistency , the incidence of colic , spitting up / regurgitation , crying , restlessness or vomiting .
There was no impact of prebiotics on the volume of formula tolerated , infections and gastrointestinal microflora .
Authors ’ conclusions There is not enough evidence to state that supplementation of term infant formula with synbiotics , probiotics or prebiotics does result in improved growth or clinical outcomes in term infants .
There is no data available to establish if synbiotics are superior to probiotics or prebiotics
Background Synbiotics , probiotics or prebiotics are being added to infant formula to promote growth and development in infants .
Previous review s ( 2007 to 2011 ) on term infants given probiotics or prebiotics focused on prevention of allergic disease and food hypersensitivity .
This review focused on growth and clinical outcomes in term infants fed only infant formula containing synbiotics , probiotics or prebiotics .