Educational interventions did not seem to have a positive impact on HbA1c , systolic blood pressure or lipid profiles .
The use of telemedicine , clinician reminders and feedback showed mixed results but there was a level of consistency in improvement in HbA1c when multifaceted interventions on multidisciplinary teams were implemented .
Targeting general or family physicians was largely ineffective in improving the cardiovascular risk factors considered , except when using a computer application on insulin h and ling of type 2 diabetes or customised simulated cases with feedbacks .
Similarly , interventions targeting nurses did not improve outcomes compared to st and ard care .
Multifaceted professional interventions were more effective than single interventions targeting single primary or community care professionals in improving glycaemic control
OBJECTIVE To review the interventions targeting primary care or community based professionals on glycaemic and cardiovascular risk factor control in people with diabetes .
Effectiveness of the diabetes education and self management for ongoing and newly diagnosed (DESMOND) programme for people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: cluster randomised controlled trial
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of a structured group education programme on biomedical , psychosocial , and lifestyle measures in people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes . Design Multicentre cluster r and omised controlled trial in primary care with r and omisation at practice level . Setting 207 general practice s in 13 primary care sites in the United Kingdom . Participants 824 adults ( 55 % men , mean age 59.5 years ) . Intervention A structured group education programme for six hours delivered in the community by two trained healthcare professional educators compared with usual care . Main outcome measures Haemoglobin A1c levels , blood pressure , weight , blood lipid levels , smoking status , physical activity , quality of life , beliefs about illness , depression , and emotional impact of diabetes at baseline and up to 12 months . Main results Haemoglobin A1c levels at 12 months had decreased by 1.49 % in the intervention group compared with 1.21 % in the control group . After adjusting for baseline and cluster , the difference was not significant : 0.05 % ( 95 % confidence interval −0.10 % to 0.20 % ) . The intervention group showed a greater weight loss : −2.98 kg ( 95 % confidence interval −3.54 to −2.41 ) compared with 1.86 kg ( −2.44 to −1.28 ) , P=0.027 at 12 months . The odds of not smoking were 3.56 ( 95 % confidence interval 1.11 to 11.45 ) , P=0.033 higher in the intervention group at 12 months . The intervention group showed significantly greater changes in illness belief scores ( P=0.001 ) ; directions of change were positive indicating greater underst and ing of diabetes . The intervention group had a lower depression score at 12 months : mean difference was −0.50 ( 95 % confidence interval −0.96 to −0.04 ) ; P=0.032 . A positive association was found between change in perceived personal responsibility and weight loss at 12 months ( β=0.12 ; P=0.008 ) . Conclusion A structured group education programme for patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes result ed in greater improvements in weight loss and smoking cessation and positive improvements in beliefs about illness but no difference in haemoglobin A1c levels up to 12 months after diagnosis . Trial registration Current Controlled Trials IS RCT N17844016
Educational interventions did not seem to have a positive impact on HbA1c , systolic blood pressure or lipid profiles .
The use of telemedicine , clinician reminders and feedback showed mixed results but there was a level of consistency in improvement in HbA1c when multifaceted interventions on multidisciplinary teams were implemented .
Targeting general or family physicians was largely ineffective in improving the cardiovascular risk factors considered , except when using a computer application on insulin h and ling of type 2 diabetes or customised simulated cases with feedbacks .
Similarly , interventions targeting nurses did not improve outcomes compared to st and ard care .
Multifaceted professional interventions were more effective than single interventions targeting single primary or community care professionals in improving glycaemic control
OBJECTIVE To review the interventions targeting primary care or community based professionals on glycaemic and cardiovascular risk factor control in people with diabetes .