Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
Dance and Movement Program Improves Quality‐of‐Life Measures in Breast Cancer Survivors
A pilot research study was conducted at 2 cancer centers in Connecticut to determine the effect of a dance and movement program on quality of life and shoulder function in breast cancer survivors treated within the prior 5 years . Thirty-five women completed the trial that included a 12-week intervention , using The Lebed Method , Focus on Healing Through Movement and Dance . The study design was a r and omized control trial with a wait list control group crossover to active treatment in weeks 13 to 25 , with the treatment group receiving the program in weeks 1 to 12 , and no program in weeks 13 to 25 . Outcome measures were the Breast Cancer Quality of Life ( FACT-B ) , Shoulder range of motion ( ROM ) , and Body Image Scale . FACT-B significantly improved in the intervention group at 13 weeks from 102.0 ± 15.8 to 116.7 ± 16.9 , compared to the wait list group 108.1 ± 16.4 to 107.1 ± 21.3 ( time × group effect , P = .008 ) . During the crossover phase , the FACT-B score increased in the wait list group and was stable in the treatment group . The overall effect of the training at 26 weeks was significant ( time effect , P = .03 ) , and the order of training was also significant ( P = .015 ) . Shoulder ROM increased in both groups at 13 weeks —15 ° and 8 ° in the intervention and wait list groups ( Time effect , P = .03 ; time × group , P = .58 ) . Body Image improved similarly in both groups at 13 weeks ( time effect , P = .001 ; time × group , P = .25 ) , and at 26 weeks . There was no significant effect of the order of training for these outcome measures . A dance movement program that addressed the physical and emotional needs of women following treatment for breast cancer substantially improved a breast cancer – specific quality -of-life measure . Larger studies are justified to determine the acceptability of this therapy as part of the continuum of care for breast cancer survivors
Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?