The EQ-5D and SF-36 achieved mixed results in the quantitative testing against psychometric criteria .
The qualitative analysis suggests this is because they provide a very limited coverage of themes identified by people with mental health problems .
BACKGROUND Generic preference-based measures of health like the EQ-5D and SF-6D ( ® ) are increasingly being used in economic evaluation and outcome assessment .
However , there are concerns as to whether or not these generic measures are appropriate for use in people with mental health problems .
OBJECTIVES The EQ-5D and SF-36 ( ® ) ( including its derivatives the SF-12 ( ® ) and SF-6D ) were assessed using the psychometric criteria of validity and responsiveness using quantitative and qualitative methods .
Another aim was to estimate mapping functions between the EQ-5D and SF-6D and condition-specific measures , where appropriate .
Olanzapine versus haloperidol in the treatment of acute mania: clinical outcomes, health-related quality of life and work status
We aim ed to compare clinical outcomes , health-related quality of life ( HRQOL ) and work status associated with olanzapine and haloperidol treatment in patients with bipolar disorder . This double-blind , r and omized controlled trial , comparing flexible dosing of olanzapine ( 5–20 mg/day , n = 234 ) to haloperidol ( 3–15 mg/day , n = 219 ) , consisted of a 6-week acute phase , followed by a 6-week continuation phase . Symptomatic remission rates were similar for olanzapine- and haloperidol-treated patients at weeks 6 and 12 . At week 6 , significant changes in five dimensions of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey ( SF-36 ) [ general health ( P = 0.010 ) , physical functioning ( P < 0.001 ) , role limitations due to physical problems ( P < 0.001 ) , social functioning ( P < 0.05 ) and vitality ( P < 0.01 ) ] and the SF-36 physical components summary score were found in favour of olanzapine compared to haloperidol . At week 12 , olanzapine treatment maintained the significantly favourable HRQOL changes . At the end of week 12 , patients on olanzapine showed significantly greater improvement than haloperidol  in work activities impairment and household activities impairment scores on the Streamlined Longitudinal Interview Clinical Evaluation from the Longitudinal Interval Follow-up Evaluation ( SLICE/LIFE ) activities impairment scores . Subgroup analyses revealed that olanzapine treatment significantly increased a proportion of employed patients and their weekly paid working hours . In conclusion , compared to haloperidol , olanzapine treatment was comparably effective in the remission of bipolar mania and significantly improved HRQOL and work status in patients with bipolar I disorder
The EQ-5D and SF-36 achieved mixed results in the quantitative testing against psychometric criteria .
The qualitative analysis suggests this is because they provide a very limited coverage of themes identified by people with mental health problems .
BACKGROUND Generic preference-based measures of health like the EQ-5D and SF-6D ( ® ) are increasingly being used in economic evaluation and outcome assessment .
However , there are concerns as to whether or not these generic measures are appropriate for use in people with mental health problems .
OBJECTIVES The EQ-5D and SF-36 ( ® ) ( including its derivatives the SF-12 ( ® ) and SF-6D ) were assessed using the psychometric criteria of validity and responsiveness using quantitative and qualitative methods .
Another aim was to estimate mapping functions between the EQ-5D and SF-6D and condition-specific measures , where appropriate .