Conclusions ART single-surface restorations  presented high survival percentages in both primary and permanent posterior teeth , whilst ART multiple-surface restorations presented lower survival percentages .
ART sealants presented a high-caries-preventive effect .
Clinical relevance ART is an effective evidence -based option for treating and preventing carious lesions in primary and permanent posterior teeth
Objective The aim of the present study is to up date the results of two previous meta-analyses , published in 2006 and 2012 , on the survival percentages of  atraumatic restorative treatment ( ART ) restorations and ART sealants .
The current meta- analysis includes Chinese publications not investigated before .
Short communication: Influence of different isolation methods on the survival of proximal ART restorations in primary molars after two years.
AIM This was to evaluate the influence of two methods of tooth-isolation on the survival rate of proximal ART restorations in the primary molars . METHODS The study was conducted in two rural divisions in Kenya , with 7 operators r and omly paired to a group of 8 assistants . A total of 804 children each had one proximal cavity in a primary molar restored using the ART approach .  During restorations 2 isolation methods , rubber dam or cotton wool rolls , and 3 br and s of glass ionomer cements were used by the operators . The restorations were then followed for a period of 2 years . STATISTICS SPSS 14.0 was used to analyse and relate the data obtained to the method of isolation used . RESULTS After 2 years 30.8 % of the ART restorations had survived . Higher survival rates of the restorations were obtained when using rubber dam irrespective of the GIC material or the operator . CONCLUSION Generally the survival rate of the proximal restorations in the present study was very low , but the use of rubber dam result ed in a higher survival rate of the restorations
Conclusions ART single-surface restorations  presented high survival percentages in both primary and permanent posterior teeth , whilst ART multiple-surface restorations presented lower survival percentages .
ART sealants presented a high-caries-preventive effect .
Clinical relevance ART is an effective evidence -based option for treating and preventing carious lesions in primary and permanent posterior teeth
Objective The aim of the present study is to up date the results of two previous meta-analyses , published in 2006 and 2012 , on the survival percentages of  atraumatic restorative treatment ( ART ) restorations and ART sealants .
The current meta- analysis includes Chinese publications not investigated before .