Thus , WIs were seldom design ed to improve return-to-work .
Overall , there was low quality evidence that showed no significant differences between WIs and no intervention for pain prevalence or severity .
If present , significant results in favour of WIs were not sustained across follow-up times .
Overall , this review found low quality evidence that neither supported nor refuted the benefits of any specific WI for pain relief and moderate quality evidence that a multiple-component intervention reduced sickness absence in the intermediate-term , which was not sustained over time .
BACKGROUND Musculoskeletal disorders are the most common cause of disability in many industrial countries .
Recurrent and chronic pain accounts for a substantial portion of workers ' absenteeism .
Neck pain seems to be more prominent in the general population than previously known .
OBJECTIVES To determine the effectiveness of workplace interventions ( WIs ) in adult workers with neck pain .
Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation for Subacute Low Back Pain: Graded Activity or Workplace Intervention or Both?: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Study design . Population -based r and omized controlled trial . Objective . To assess the effectiveness of workplace intervention and grade d activity , separately and combined , for multidisciplinary rehabilitation of low back pain ( LBP ) . Summary of Background Data . Effective components for multidisciplinary rehabilitation of LBP are not yet established . Methods . Participants sick-listed 2 to 6 weeks due to nonspecific LBP were r and omized to workplace intervention ( n = 96 ) or usual care ( n = 100 ) .  Workplace intervention consisted of workplace assessment , work modifications , and case management involving all stakeholders . Participants still sick-listed at 8 weeks were r and omized for grade d activity  ( n = 55 ) or usual care ( n = 57 ) . Grade d activity comprised biweekly 1-hour exercise sessions based on operant-conditioning principles . Outcomes were lasting return to work , pain intensity and functional status , assessed at baseline , and at 12 , 26 , and 52 weeks after the start of sick leave . Results . Time until return to work for workers with workplace intervention was 77 versus 104 days ( median ) for workers without this intervention ( P = 0.02 ) . Workplace intervention was effective on return to work ( hazard ratio = 1.7 ; 95 % CI , 1.2–2.3 ; P = 0.002 ) .  Grade d activity had a negative effect on return to work ( hazard ratio = 0.4 ; 95 % CI , 0.3–0.6 ; P < 0.001 ) and functional status . Combined intervention had no effect . Conclusion . Workplace intervention is advised for multidisciplinary rehabilitation of subacute LBP . Grade d activity or combined intervention is not advised
Thus , WIs were seldom design ed to improve return-to-work .
Overall , there was low quality evidence that showed no significant differences between WIs and no intervention for pain prevalence or severity .
If present , significant results in favour of WIs were not sustained across follow-up times .
Overall , this review found low quality evidence that neither supported nor refuted the benefits of any specific WI for pain relief and moderate quality evidence that a multiple-component intervention reduced sickness absence in the intermediate-term , which was not sustained over time .
BACKGROUND Musculoskeletal disorders are the most common cause of disability in many industrial countries .
Recurrent and chronic pain accounts for a substantial portion of workers ' absenteeism .
Neck pain seems to be more prominent in the general population than previously known .
OBJECTIVES To determine the effectiveness of workplace interventions ( WIs ) in adult workers with neck pain .