Some statistically significant differences between citalopram and other antidepressants for the acute phase treatment of major depression were found in terms of efficacy , tolerability and acceptability .
Citalopram was more efficacious than paroxetine and reboxetine and more acceptable than tricyclics , reboxetine and venlafaxine , however , it seemed to be less efficacious than escitalopram .
BACKGROUND Recent US and UK clinical practice guidelines recommend that second-generation antidepressants should be considered amongst the best first-line options when drug therapy is indicated for a depressive episode .
Systematic review s have already highlighted some differences in efficacy between second-generation antidepressants .
Citalopram , one of the first selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors ( SSRI ) introduced in the market , is one of these antidepressant drugs that clinicians use for routine depression care .
OBJECTIVES To assess the evidence for the efficacy , acceptability and tolerability of citalopram in comparison with tricyclics , heterocyclics , other SSRIs and other conventional and non-conventional antidepressants in the acute-phase treatment of major depression .
A comparative study of milnacipran and paroxetine in outpatients with major depression.
BACKGROUND Milnacipran is a dual-action antidepressant which inhibits both serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake with no affinity for any neurotransmitter receptor studied . METHODS A 6-week double-blind multicentre study compared milnacipran ( 100 mg/day ) with paroxetine ( 20 mg/day ) in 300 out patients with major depression . Efficacy was evaluated using HAMD17 , MADRS and CGI for severity of illness and global improvement . Data were analysed on an intention to treat , last observation carried forward , basis . RESULTS Milnacipran and paroxetine were both effective and well tolerated with no significant difference in their effects . After treatment discontinuation , milnacipran was associated with significantly less emergent symptoms . Responders , at endpoint , to milnacipran had significantly greater levels of psychomotor retardation at baseline than non-responders . LIMITATIONS The study did not include a placebo group so that it is impossible to determine absolute levels of efficacy . CONCLUSIONS Both milnacipran and paroxetine were effective and well tolerated by out patients with major depression treated for 6 weeks . After treatment discontinuation milnacipran was associated with less emergent symptoms . Psychomotor retardation at baseline may be a predictive factor of a favourable response to milnacipran
Some statistically significant differences between citalopram and other antidepressants for the acute phase treatment of major depression were found in terms of efficacy , tolerability and acceptability .
Citalopram was more efficacious than paroxetine and reboxetine and more acceptable than tricyclics , reboxetine and venlafaxine , however , it seemed to be less efficacious than escitalopram .
BACKGROUND Recent US and UK clinical practice guidelines recommend that second-generation antidepressants should be considered amongst the best first-line options when drug therapy is indicated for a depressive episode .
Systematic review s have already highlighted some differences in efficacy between second-generation antidepressants .
Citalopram , one of the first selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors ( SSRI ) introduced in the market , is one of these antidepressant drugs that clinicians use for routine depression care .
OBJECTIVES To assess the evidence for the efficacy , acceptability and tolerability of citalopram in comparison with tricyclics , heterocyclics , other SSRIs and other conventional and non-conventional antidepressants in the acute-phase treatment of major depression .