These measures assess balance and falls risk prediction at the body , structure and function level , falls risk and balance , and falls risk at the activity level .
The motor examination of the Unified Parkinson ’s Disease Rating Scale ( UPDRS-ME ) with robust psychometric analysis is a condition-specific measure with acceptable properties .
Conclusion : Six of the 68 outcome measures have strong psychometric properties for the assessment of balance and falls risk prediction in PD .
Objective : To investigate the psychometric properties of measures of balance and falls risk prediction in people with Parkinson ’s disease ( PD ) .
Instrumented Test of Sensory Integration for Balance: A Validation Study
Background and Purpose : Abnormal postural sway is associated with an increase in risk of falls but is difficult for clinicians to accurately quantify without access to laboratory equipment . Instrumenting clinical outcome measures using body-worn movement monitors is a low-cost alternative . This is the first study to compare the modified Clinical Test of Sensory Integration for Balance ( i-mCTSIB ) to the laboratory test of the Sensory Organization Test ( SOT ) with dynamic posturography in a group of participants with Parkinson 's disease ( PD ) and subtle balance limitations . The purpose of this study was to ( 1 ) determine the concurrent validity of the i-mCTSIB with the SOT ( 6 and 4 conditions ) and ( 2 ) compare the i-mCTSIB and the SOT to differentiate between individuals with and without recent falls within the previous 6 months . Methods : This cross-sectional study examined 26 participants with idiopathic PD who had a Motor Unified Parkinson 's Disease Rating Scale score of 32.7 ( 13.5 ) out of 108 . Results : The composite and conditions 1 and 4 of the i-mCTSIB and SOT scores were significantly correlated : composite scores r = −0.64 ( P ⩽ .001 ) , C1 r = −0.43 ( P = .03 ) , C3 r = −0.60 ( P ⩽ .01 ) , and C4 r = −0.54 ( P ⩽ .001 ) . A significant difference was observed in mean i-mCTSIB composite scores between fallers and nonfallers ( P = .04 ) . In contrast , the SOT composite was not significantly different between fallers and nonfallers ( P = 0.31 ) . Discussion : The results suggest that the i-mCTSIB may be a valid and clinical ly meaningful measure of sensory organization in persons with PD , even those with mild postural instability as measured by the median Hoehn and Yahr score ( 2.0 ) . Future research should evaluate predictive validity of the i-mCTSIB for prospect i ve falls . Conclusion : The instrumented mCTSIB with portable , body-worn movement allows clinicians to quantify abnormal postural sway without the ceiling effects of clinical balance testing or the expense and importability of force plate technology in the SOT . Instrumenting mCTSIB may also distinguish between fallers and nonfallers
These measures assess balance and falls risk prediction at the body , structure and function level , falls risk and balance , and falls risk at the activity level .
The motor examination of the Unified Parkinson ’s Disease Rating Scale ( UPDRS-ME ) with robust psychometric analysis is a condition-specific measure with acceptable properties .
Conclusion : Six of the 68 outcome measures have strong psychometric properties for the assessment of balance and falls risk prediction in PD .
Objective : To investigate the psychometric properties of measures of balance and falls risk prediction in people with Parkinson ’s disease ( PD ) .