Subgroup analyses suggested that organisational interventions and interventions on those with baseline HbA1c over 9.5 % had better improvements in HbA1c .
Interventions had a modest improvement of blood pressure and lipids , although baseline levels of control were generally good .
Conclusions This review suggests that interventions for T2DM , in primary care , are better targeted at individuals with very poor glycaemic control and that organisational interventions may be more effective
Objectives Poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus ( T2DM ) is a major international health problem .
Caring for Poorly Controlled Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized Pharmacist Intervention
BACKGROUND : There is limited information from r and omized controlled studies about the influence of pharmacist interventions on diabetes control . OBJECTIVE : To evaluate the effect of a pharmacist intervention on improving diabetes control ; secondary endpoints were medication appropriateness and self-reported adherence . METHODS : A r and omized , controlled , multi-clinic trial was conducted in the University of Washington Medicine Neighborhood Clinics . Seventy-seven subjects , ⩾18 years old with a hemoglobin ( Hb ) A1c ⩾9 % at baseline and taking at least one oral diabetes medication , were r and omized to receive a pharmacist intervention ( n = 43 ) or usual care ( n = 34 ) for 6 months followed by a 6-month usual-care observation period for both groups . Subjects met with a clinical pharmacist to establish and initiate a diabetes care plan followed by weekly visits or telephone calls to facilitate diabetes management and adherence . HbA1c , medication appropriateness , and self-reported adherence were assessed at baseline , 6 months , and 12 months . RESULTS : The mean HbA1c did not differ between groups over the 12-month period ( p = 0.61 ) . A reduction in HbA1c was noted for both groups over time compared with baseline ( p = 0.001 ) ; however , control subjects relied more heavily on provider visits . Medication appropriateness was not improved for diabetes medications ( p = 0.65 ) . Self-reported adherence was not significantly improved by the intervention . CONCLUSIONS : This pharmacist intervention did not significantly improve diabetes control , but did allow for similar HbA1c control with fewer physician visits . Medication appropriateness and self-reported adherence compared with usual care in individuals with poorly controlled diabetes were not changed
Subgroup analyses suggested that organisational interventions and interventions on those with baseline HbA1c over 9.5 % had better improvements in HbA1c .
Interventions had a modest improvement of blood pressure and lipids , although baseline levels of control were generally good .
Conclusions This review suggests that interventions for T2DM , in primary care , are better targeted at individuals with very poor glycaemic control and that organisational interventions may be more effective
Objectives Poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus ( T2DM ) is a major international health problem .