The home-delivery ( n = 1 ) and dietary recommendation ( n = 3 ) RCTs showed similar effects with the exception of greater improvements in triglycerides relative to the control with the home delivery .
None of the RCTs evaluated an improvement in quality of life .
The Paleolithic diet result ed in greater short-term improvements in metabolic syndrome components than did guideline -based control diets .
BACKGROUND Paleolithic nutrition , which has attracted substantial public attention lately because of its putative health benefits , differs radically from dietary patterns currently recommended in guidelines , particularly in terms of its recommendation to exclude grains , dairy , and nutritional products of industry .
OBJECTIVE We evaluated whether a Paleolithic nutritional pattern improves risk factors for chronic disease more than do other dietary interventions .
A Palaeolithic diet improves glucose tolerance more than a Mediterranean-like diet in individuals with ischaemic heart disease
Aims /hypothesisMost studies of diet in glucose intolerance and type 2 diabetes have focused on intakes of fat , carbohydrate , fibre , fruits and vegetables . Instead , we aim ed to compare diets that were available during human evolution with more recently introduced ones . Methods Twenty-nine patients with ischaemic heart disease plus either glucose intolerance or type 2 diabetes were r and omised to receive ( 1 ) a Palaeolithic ( ‘ Old Stone Age ’ ) diet ( n = 14 ) , based on lean meat , fish , fruits , vegetables , root vegetables , eggs and nuts ; or ( 2 ) a Consensus ( Mediterranean-like ) diet ( n = 15 ) , based on whole grains , low-fat dairy products , vegetables , fruits , fish , oils and margarines . Primary outcome variables were changes in weight , waist circumference and plasma glucose AUC ( AUC Glucose0–120 ) and plasma insulin AUC ( AUC Insulin0–120 ) in OGTTs . Results Over 12 weeks , there was a 26 % decrease of AUC Glucose0–120 ( p = 0.0001 ) in the Palaeolithic group and a 7 % decrease ( p = 0.08 ) in the Consensus group . The larger ( p = 0.001 ) improvement in the Palaeolithic group was independent ( p = 0.0008 ) of change in waist circumference ( −5.6 cm in the Palaeolithic group , −2.9 cm in the Consensus group ; p = 0.03 ) . In the study population as a whole , there was no relationship between change in AUC Glucose0–120 and changes in weight ( r = −0.06 , p = 0.9 ) or waist circumference ( r = 0.01 , p = 1.0 ) . There was a tendency for a larger decrease of AUC Insulin0–120 in the Palaeolithic group , but because of the strong association between change in AUC Insulin0–120 and change in waist circumference ( r = 0.64 , p = 0.0003 ) , this did not remain after multivariate analysis . Conclusions /interpretationA Palaeolithic diet may improve glucose tolerance independently of decreased waist circumference
The home-delivery ( n = 1 ) and dietary recommendation ( n = 3 ) RCTs showed similar effects with the exception of greater improvements in triglycerides relative to the control with the home delivery .
None of the RCTs evaluated an improvement in quality of life .
The Paleolithic diet result ed in greater short-term improvements in metabolic syndrome components than did guideline -based control diets .
BACKGROUND Paleolithic nutrition , which has attracted substantial public attention lately because of its putative health benefits , differs radically from dietary patterns currently recommended in guidelines , particularly in terms of its recommendation to exclude grains , dairy , and nutritional products of industry .
OBJECTIVE We evaluated whether a Paleolithic nutritional pattern improves risk factors for chronic disease more than do other dietary interventions .