Sensitivity analysis indicates that from both perspectives the service is very cost effective and may be cost saving .
CONCLUSIONS These results make alcohol screening and counseling one of the highest-ranking preventive services among the 25 effective services evaluated using st and ardized methods .
BACKGROUND The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force ( USPSTF ) has recommended screening and behavioral counseling interventions in primary care to reduce alcohol misuse .
This study was design ed to develop a st and ardized rating for the clinical ly preventable burden and cost effectiveness of complying with that recommendation that would allow comparisons across many recommended services .
Early intervention in patients with excessive consumption of alcohol: a controlled study.
From a population of 2,114 patients attending somatic outpatient clinics , 78 patients were selected who had either an excessive consumption of alcohol according to question naires or a raised gamma glutamyltransferase ( GGT ) value ( above 0.6 mu kat/l ) due to alcohol . They had not undergone treatment for problem drinking previously , and had no serious alcohol dependence . They were thereby classified as excessive consumers of alcohol , and r and omly allocated to an intervention ( n = 36 ) or to a control group ( n = 42 ) . Those in the intervention group were followed up by a nurse once a month and by a doctor every third month for a total of 12 months . Laboratory tests were taken monthly . Consumption of alcohol , GGT and triglyceride levels , and sickness allowance days were decreased in the intervention group compared to the time before intervention . In contrast , the number of sickness allowance days in the control group increased . There was also a tendency towards a positive effect of intervention on the number of consultations made with a statistically not significant decrease of consultations after intervention . The study thus indicates that an early and relatively simple intervention programme for problem drinkers may be effective and can be carried out at a low cost and with a positive response from the patients
Sensitivity analysis indicates that from both perspectives the service is very cost effective and may be cost saving .
CONCLUSIONS These results make alcohol screening and counseling one of the highest-ranking preventive services among the 25 effective services evaluated using st and ardized methods .
BACKGROUND The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force ( USPSTF ) has recommended screening and behavioral counseling interventions in primary care to reduce alcohol misuse .
This study was design ed to develop a st and ardized rating for the clinical ly preventable burden and cost effectiveness of complying with that recommendation that would allow comparisons across many recommended services .