Total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol were reduced in all trials but there was evidence of heterogeneity of effects .
There was no evidence of any serious harm caused by statin prescription .
Evidence available to date showed that primary prevention with statins is likely to be cost-effective and may improve patient quality of life .
Recent findings from the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists study using individual patient data meta- analysis indicate that these benefits are similar in people at lower ( < 1 % per year ) risk of a major cardiovascular event .
AUTHORS ' CONCLUSIONS Reductions in all-cause mortality , major vascular events and revascularisations were found with no excess of adverse events among people without evidence of CVD treated with statins
BACKGROUND Reducing high blood cholesterol , a risk factor for cardiovascular disease ( CVD ) events in people with and without a past history of CVD is an important goal of pharmacotherapy .
Statins are the first-choice agents .
Previous review s of the effects of statins have highlighted their benefits in people with CVD .
The case for primary prevention was uncertain when the last version of this review was published ( 2011 ) and in light of new data an up date of this review is required .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects , both harms and benefits , of statins in people with no history of CVD .
Effect of Lipid Lowering With Rosuvastatin on Progression of Aortic Stenosis: Results of the Aortic Stenosis Progression Observation: Measuring Effects of Rosuvastatin (ASTRONOMER) Trial
Background — Aortic stenosis ( AS ) is an active process with similarities to atherosclerosis . The objective of this study was to assess the effect of cholesterol lowering with rosuvastatin on the progression of AS . Methods and Results — This was a r and omized , double-blind , placebo-controlled trial in asymptomatic patients with mild to moderate AS and no clinical indications for cholesterol lowering . The patients were r and omized to receive either placebo or rosuvastatin 40 mg daily . A total of 269 patients were r and omized : 134 patients to rosuvastatin 40 mg daily and 135 patients to placebo . Annual echocardiograms were performed to assess AS progression , which was the primary outcome ; the median follow-up was 3.5 years . The peak AS gradient increased in patients receiving rosuvastatin from a baseline of 40.8±11.1 to 57.8±22.7 mm Hg at the end of follow-up and in patients with placebo from 41.6±10.9 mm Hg at baseline to 54.8±19.8 mm Hg at the end of follow-up . The annualized increase in the peak AS gradient was 6.3±6.9 mm Hg in the rosuvastatin group and 6.1±8.2 mm Hg in the placebo group ( P=0.83 ) . Treatment with rosuvastatin was not associated with a reduction in AS progression in any of the predefined subgroups . Conclusion — Cholesterol lowering with rosuvastatin 40 mg did not reduce the progression of AS in patients with mild to moderate AS ; thus , statins should not be used for the sole purpose of reducing the progression of AS . Clinical Trial Registration Information— URL : http://www.controlled-trials.com/. Clinical trial registration number : IS RCT N 32424163
Total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol were reduced in all trials but there was evidence of heterogeneity of effects .
There was no evidence of any serious harm caused by statin prescription .
Evidence available to date showed that primary prevention with statins is likely to be cost-effective and may improve patient quality of life .
Recent findings from the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists study using individual patient data meta- analysis indicate that these benefits are similar in people at lower ( < 1 % per year ) risk of a major cardiovascular event .
AUTHORS ' CONCLUSIONS Reductions in all-cause mortality , major vascular events and revascularisations were found with no excess of adverse events among people without evidence of CVD treated with statins
BACKGROUND Reducing high blood cholesterol , a risk factor for cardiovascular disease ( CVD ) events in people with and without a past history of CVD is an important goal of pharmacotherapy .
Statins are the first-choice agents .
Previous review s of the effects of statins have highlighted their benefits in people with CVD .
The case for primary prevention was uncertain when the last version of this review was published ( 2011 ) and in light of new data an up date of this review is required .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects , both harms and benefits , of statins in people with no history of CVD .