The Frailty Index was examined in almost all these dimensions , with the exception of reliability , and its diagnostic and predictive characteristics were shown to be satisfactory .
Gait speed showed high sensitivity , but only moderate specificity , and excellent predictive ability for future disability in activities of daily living .
The Tilburg Frailty Indicator was shown to be a reliable and valid measure for frailty screening , but its diagnostic accuracy was not evaluated .
Screening Letter , Timed-up- and -go test and PRISMA 7 ( Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review s and Meta-Analyses ) demonstrated high sensitivity and moderate specificity for identifying frailty .
In general , low physical activity , variously measured , was one of the most powerful predictors of future decline in activities of daily living .
Conclusion Only a few frailty measures seem to be demonstrably valid , reliable and diagnostically accurate , and have good predictive ability .
Nevertheless , it was clear that no suitable tool for assessing frailty appropriately in emergency departments was identified
Background A scoping search identified systematic review s on diagnostic accuracy and predictive ability of frailty measures in older adults .
In most cases , research was confined to specific assessment measures related to a specific clinical model .
Objectives To summarize the best available evidence from systematic review s in relation to reliability , validity , diagnostic accuracy and predictive ability of frailty measures in older adults .
Evaluation of a frailty index based on a comprehensive geriatric assessment in a population based study of elderly Canadians
Background and aims : Objectives were to develop a frailty index ( FI ) based on a st and ard comprehensive geriatric assessment ( CGA ) derived from a clinical examination ; to assess the validity of the FI-CGA and to compare its precision with other frailty measures . Methods : Design : Secondary analysis of a prospect i ve cohort study , with five-year follow-up data . Setting : Second phase of the Canadian Study of Health and Aging ( CSHA-2 ) ; clinical examinations were performed in clinics , nursing homes , and patients ’ homes . Participants : People selected ( as either cognitively impaired cases or unimpaired controls ) to receive the CSHA-2 clinical examination ( n=2305 ; women=1431 ) . Measurements : Clinical and performance-based measures and diagnostic data were extracted to correspond to the 10 impairment domains and the single comorbidity domain of a CGA . The proportion of deficits accumulated in each domain was calculated to yield the FI-CGA . The FI-CGA was vali date d and its predictive ability compared with other frailty measures . Results : Within the seven grade s of fitness/frailty identified , subjects with greater frailty were older , less educated , and more likely to be women . The FI-CGA correlated highly with a previously vali date d , empirically-derived frailty index ( r=0.76 ) . Frailty was associated with higher risk of death ( for each increment in frailty , the hazard ratio , adjusted for age , sex and education , was 1.23 ( 95 % CI 1.18–1.29 ) and institutionalization ( HR 1.20 ; 1.10–1.32 ) . Conclusions : In a population survey , the FI-CGA is a valid means of quantifying frailty from routinely collected data
The Frailty Index was examined in almost all these dimensions , with the exception of reliability , and its diagnostic and predictive characteristics were shown to be satisfactory .
Gait speed showed high sensitivity , but only moderate specificity , and excellent predictive ability for future disability in activities of daily living .
The Tilburg Frailty Indicator was shown to be a reliable and valid measure for frailty screening , but its diagnostic accuracy was not evaluated .
Screening Letter , Timed-up- and -go test and PRISMA 7 ( Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review s and Meta-Analyses ) demonstrated high sensitivity and moderate specificity for identifying frailty .
In general , low physical activity , variously measured , was one of the most powerful predictors of future decline in activities of daily living .
Conclusion Only a few frailty measures seem to be demonstrably valid , reliable and diagnostically accurate , and have good predictive ability .
Nevertheless , it was clear that no suitable tool for assessing frailty appropriately in emergency departments was identified
Background A scoping search identified systematic review s on diagnostic accuracy and predictive ability of frailty measures in older adults .
In most cases , research was confined to specific assessment measures related to a specific clinical model .
Objectives To summarize the best available evidence from systematic review s in relation to reliability , validity , diagnostic accuracy and predictive ability of frailty measures in older adults .