Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
Effect of supervised and home exercise training on bone mineral density among breast cancer patients. A 12-month randomised controlled trial
Summary The ability of combined step aerobic- and circuit-training to prevent bone loss after breast cancer treatments was related to skeletal site and patients ’ menopausal status . Among premenopausal breast cancer survivors , a 12-month exercise intervention completely prevented bone loss at the femoral neck , whereas no exercise effect was seen at lumbar spine or at neither site in postmenopausal women . Introduction The primary objective of this r and omised clinical trial was to determine the preventive effect of supervised weight-bearing jumping exercises and circuit training on bone loss among breast cancer patients . Methods Of 573 breast cancer survivors aged 35–68 years r and omly allocated into  exercise  or  control group after adjuvant treatments , 498 ( 87 % ) were included in the final analysis . The 12-month exercise intervention comprised weekly supervised step aerobic- and circuit-exercises and similar home training . Bone mineral density ( BMD ) at lumbar spine and femoral neck were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry . Physical performance was assessed by 2-km walking and figure-8 running tests , and the amount of physical activity was estimated in metabolic equivalent-hours/week . Results In premenopausal women  , bone loss at the femoral neck was prevented by exercise , the mean BMD changes being −0.2 % among the trainees vs. −1.4 % among the controls ( p = 0.01 ) . Lumbar bone loss could not be prevented ( −1.9 % vs. −2.2 % ) . In postmenopausal women , no significant exercise-effect on BMD was found either at the lumbar spine ( −1.6 % vs. −2.1 % ) or femoral neck ( −1.1 % vs. −1.1 % ) . Conclusions This 12-month aerobic jumping and circuit training intervention completely prevented femoral neck bone loss in premenopausal breast cancer patients , whereas no effect on BMD was seen in postmenopausal women
Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?