Conclusion In patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation  , cryoballoon and radiofrequency ablation produce similar results in terms of freedom from recurrent atrial fibrillation or atrial tachyarrhythmias but with a different safety profile , being cryoballoon ablation less associated with cardiac complications but more likely to cause phrenic nerve palsy
Aims To perform an up date d meta- analysis to assess efficacy , safety and technical performance of pulmonary vein isolation using cryoballoon or radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation .
Is Pulmonary Vein Isolation Necessary for Curing Atrial Fibrillation?
Background —Pulmonary veins ( PVs ) play a pivotal role in initiating and perpetuating  atrial fibrillation ( AF ) . We investigated if PV electrical isolation from the left atrium is required for curing AF . Methods and Result —Fifty-one patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF underwent circumferential radiofrequency ablation of PV ostia performed with an anatomic approach . The end point of the ablation procedure was the recording of low peak-to-peak bipolar potentials ( < 0.1 mV ) inside the lesions . Left atrium pacing was used to assess the conduction between the PVs and the left atrium . During a mean follow-up period of 16.6±3.9 months , 41 patients ( 80.4 % ) were free of atrial arrhythmias . When patients with and without AF recurrence were analyzed , no significant difference was observed in the mean number of PVs in which the ablation end point was reached ( 3.4±1.2 versus 3.7±0.87 ) and PVs isolated ( 1.5±1.4 versus 1.6±1 ) . We noted that , although in 29 of 41 patients ( 71 % ) without AF recurrence , the ablation end point was reached in all PVs mapped , it was only possible to demonstrate the isolation of all PVs mapped in 2 patients . On the other h and , in 7 of 10 patients ( 70 % ) with AF recurrence , the ablation end point was reached in all PVs mapped , whereas one patient had all PVs isolated . Conclusions —Our findings show that with the use of a pure anatomic approach , it is possible to prevent AF in > 80 % of patients undergoing catheter ablation . Moreover , the isolation of PVs is not crucial for curing AF
Conclusion In patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation  , cryoballoon and radiofrequency ablation produce similar results in terms of freedom from recurrent atrial fibrillation or atrial tachyarrhythmias but with a different safety profile , being cryoballoon ablation less associated with cardiac complications but more likely to cause phrenic nerve palsy
Aims To perform an up date d meta- analysis to assess efficacy , safety and technical performance of pulmonary vein isolation using cryoballoon or radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation .