Educational interventions did not seem to have a positive impact on HbA1c , systolic blood pressure or lipid profiles .
The use of telemedicine , clinician reminders and feedback showed mixed results but there was a level of consistency in improvement in HbA1c when multifaceted interventions on multidisciplinary teams were implemented .
Targeting general or family physicians was largely ineffective in improving the cardiovascular risk factors considered , except when using a computer application on insulin h and ling of type 2 diabetes or customised simulated cases with feedbacks .
Similarly , interventions targeting nurses did not improve outcomes compared to st and ard care .
Multifaceted professional interventions were more effective than single interventions targeting single primary or community care professionals in improving glycaemic control
OBJECTIVE To review the interventions targeting primary care or community based professionals on glycaemic and cardiovascular risk factor control in people with diabetes .
Research Paper: A Randomized Trial Comparing Telemedicine Case Management with Usual Care in Older, Ethnically Diverse, Medically Underserved Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: 5 Year Results of the IDEATel Study
CONTEXT Telemedicine is a promising but largely unproven technology for providing case management services to patients with chronic conditions and lower access to care . OBJECTIVES To examine the effectiveness of a telemedicine intervention to achieve clinical management goals in older , ethnically diverse , medically underserved patients with diabetes . DESIGN , Setting , and Patients A r and omized controlled trial was conducted , comparing telemedicine case management to usual care , with blinded outcome evaluation , in 1,665 Medicare recipients with diabetes , aged > /= 55 years , residing in federally design ated medically underserved areas of New York State . Interventions Home telemedicine unit with nurse case management versus usual care . Main Outcome Measures The primary endpoints assessed over 5 years of follow-up were hemoglobin A1c ( HgbA1c ) , low density lipoprotein ( LDL ) cholesterol , and blood pressure levels . RESULTS Intention-to-treat mixed models showed that telemedicine achieved net overall reductions over five years of follow-up in the primary endpoints ( HgbA1c , p = 0.001 ; LDL , p < 0.001 ; systolic and diastolic blood pressure , p = 0.024 ; p < 0.001 ) . Estimated differences ( 95 % CI ) in year 5 were 0.29 ( 0.12 , 0.46)% for HgbA1c , 3.84 ( -0.08 , 7.77 ) mg/dL for LDL cholesterol , and 4.32 ( 1.93 , 6.72 ) mm Hg for systolic and 2.64 ( 1.53 , 3.74 ) mm Hg for diastolic blood pressure . There were 176 deaths in the intervention group and 169 in the usual care group ( hazard ratio 1.01 [ 0.82 , 1.24 ] ) . CONCLUSIONS Telemedicine case management result ed in net improvements in HgbA1c , LDL-cholesterol and blood pressure levels over 5 years in medically underserved Medicare beneficiaries . Mortality was not different between the groups , although power was limited . Trial Registration http:// clinical trials.gov Identifier : NCT00271739
Educational interventions did not seem to have a positive impact on HbA1c , systolic blood pressure or lipid profiles .
The use of telemedicine , clinician reminders and feedback showed mixed results but there was a level of consistency in improvement in HbA1c when multifaceted interventions on multidisciplinary teams were implemented .
Targeting general or family physicians was largely ineffective in improving the cardiovascular risk factors considered , except when using a computer application on insulin h and ling of type 2 diabetes or customised simulated cases with feedbacks .
Similarly , interventions targeting nurses did not improve outcomes compared to st and ard care .
Multifaceted professional interventions were more effective than single interventions targeting single primary or community care professionals in improving glycaemic control
OBJECTIVE To review the interventions targeting primary care or community based professionals on glycaemic and cardiovascular risk factor control in people with diabetes .