Conclusion Based on the small number of studies with appropriate statistical analysis , we are unable to reach a clear conclusion in the clinical performance of medial stabilized knee replacement construct .
Background Medial stabilized  total knee joint replacement ( TKJR ) construct is design ed to closely replicate the kinematics of the knee .
Little is known regarding comparison of clinical functional outcomes of patients utilising vali date d patient reported outcome measures ( PROM ) after medial stabilized TKJR and other construct design s. Purpose To perform a systematic review of the available literature related to the assessment of clinical functional outcomes following a  TKJR  employing a medial stabilized construct design .
Knee Arthroplasty With a Medially Conforming Ball-and-Socket Tibiofemoral Articulation Provides Better Function
Background A knee design with a ball- and -socket articulation of the medial compartment has a femoral rollback profile similar to the native knee . Compared to a conventional , posterior-stabilized knee design , it provides AP stability throughout the entire ROM . However , it is unclear whether this design difference translates to clinical and functional improvement . Questions / purpose sWe asked whether the medially conforming ball- and -socket design differences would be associated with ( 1 ) improved ROM ; and ( 2 ) improved American Knee Society , WOMAC , Oxford Knee , SF-36 , and Total Knee Function Question naire scores compared to a conventional , fixed-bearing posterior-stabilized TKA . Patients and Methods We enrolled 82 patients in a single-center , single-blinded , r and omized , controlled trial comparing the medially conforming ball- and -socket design knee prosthesis to a posterior-stabilized total knee prosthesis .  Our primary end point was ROM . Our secondary end points were American Knee Society , WOMAC , Oxford Knee , SF-36 , and Total Knee Function Question naire scores . All patients were followed at 1 and 2 years . Results The mean ROM was 100.1 ° and 114.9 ° in the posterior-stabilized and medially conforming ball- and -socket groups , respectively . The physical component scores of SF-36 and Total Knee Function Question naire were better in the medially conforming ball- and -socket group . We found no difference in American Knee Society , WOMAC , and Oxford Knee scores . Conclusions Both implant design s similarly relieved pain and improved function . The medially conforming ball- and -socket articulation provided better high-end function as reflected by the Total Knee Function Question naire . Level of Evidence Level I , therapeutic study . See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence
Conclusion Based on the small number of studies with appropriate statistical analysis , we are unable to reach a clear conclusion in the clinical performance of medial stabilized knee replacement construct .
Background Medial stabilized  total knee joint replacement ( TKJR ) construct is design ed to closely replicate the kinematics of the knee .
Little is known regarding comparison of clinical functional outcomes of patients utilising vali date d patient reported outcome measures ( PROM ) after medial stabilized TKJR and other construct design s. Purpose To perform a systematic review of the available literature related to the assessment of clinical functional outcomes following a  TKJR  employing a medial stabilized construct design .