The DASH , the  Michigan H and Outcomes Question naire ( MHQ ) , the  Patient Evaluation Measure ( PEM ) , and the  Patient-Reported Wrist Evaluation ( PRWE ) had evidence supporting their reliability , validity , and responsiveness .
A post-hoc review of excluded studies revealed the AUSCAN Osteoarthritis H and Index as another suitable instrument that had favourable reliability , validity , and responsiveness .
The DASH , MHQ , and AUSCAN Osteoarthritis H and Index instruments were supported by the most favourable empirical evidence for validity , reliability , and responsiveness .
The PEM and PRWE also had favourable empirical evidence reported for these elements .
This paper aim ed to identify condition-specific patient-reported outcome measures used in clinical trials among people with wrist osteoarthritis and summarise empirical peer- review ed evidence supporting their reliability , validity , and responsiveness to change .
Treatment of basal joint arthritis of the thumb: trapeziectomy with or without tendon interposition/ligament reconstruction.
This prospect i ve study compared the outcome --subjective , objective and radiographic -- of two surgical techniques for treating basal joint arthritis of the thumb : a " simple " trapeziectomy ( group I ) and a ligament reconstruction/tendon ( group II ) interposition technique . There were respectively 22 patients in group I and 34 in group II , all women with primary osteoarthritis . Both techniques gave favourable results and there were no significant differences for pain relief , patient satisfaction , mobility , DASH-score , key pinch force and gripping force . However in group II , the trapezial height was better preserved indicating that the proximal migration of the thumb was prevented or limited . There was also a significant correlation between the remaining trapezial space and key pinch force
The DASH , the  Michigan H and Outcomes Question naire ( MHQ ) , the  Patient Evaluation Measure ( PEM ) , and the  Patient-Reported Wrist Evaluation ( PRWE ) had evidence supporting their reliability , validity , and responsiveness .
A post-hoc review of excluded studies revealed the AUSCAN Osteoarthritis H and Index as another suitable instrument that had favourable reliability , validity , and responsiveness .
The DASH , MHQ , and AUSCAN Osteoarthritis H and Index instruments were supported by the most favourable empirical evidence for validity , reliability , and responsiveness .
The PEM and PRWE also had favourable empirical evidence reported for these elements .
This paper aim ed to identify condition-specific patient-reported outcome measures used in clinical trials among people with wrist osteoarthritis and summarise empirical peer- review ed evidence supporting their reliability , validity , and responsiveness to change .