Pool analyses indicated that CB ablation was more beneficial in terms of procedural time [ st and ard mean difference = −0.58 ; 95 % confidence interval ( CI ) , −0.85 to −0.30 ] , complications without phrenic nerve injury ( PNI ) [ odds ratio ( OR ) = 0.79 ; 95 % CI , 0.67–0.93 ; I2 = 16 % ] , and recrudescence ( OR = 0.83 ; 95 % CI , 0.70–0.97 ; I2 = 63 % ) for PAF ; however , the total complications of CB was higher than RF .
The subgroup analysis found that , compared with non-contact force radiofrequency ( non-CF-RF ) , both first-generation cryoballoon ( CB1 ) and second-generation cryoballoon ( CB2 ) ablation  could reduce complications with PNI , procedural time , and recrudescence .
However , the safety and efficacy of CB2 was similar to those of CF-RF .
Conclusion Available overall and subgroup data suggested that both CB1 and CB2 were more beneficial than RF ablation , and the main advantages were reflected in comparing them with non-CF-RF .
However , CF-RF and CB2 showed similar clinical benefits
Purpose The present systematic review and meta- analysis aim ed to assess and compare the safety and efficacy of radiofrequency ( RF ) and cryoballoon ( CB ) ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ( PAF ) .
RF and CB ablation are two frequently used methods for pulmonary vein isolation in PAF , but which is a better choice for PAF remains uncertain .
Early Recurrence After Pulmonary Vein Isolation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation With Different Ablation Technologies - Prospective Comparison of Radiofrequency vs. Second-Generation Cryoballoon Ablation.
BACKGROUND Inflammation plays a prominent role in the etiology of the early recurrence of  atrial fibrillation ( ERAF ) . We prospect ively compared the proportion of ERAF and time-course patterns of biomarkers between radiofrequency ( RF ) and cryoballoon ( CB ) ablation . METHODS AND RESULTS We enrolled 82 consecutive paroxysmal AF patients undergoing pulmonary vein ( PV ) isolation , performed with either a 28-mm 2nd-generation CB and 3-min freeze technique or point-by-point RF ablation .  Each group had 41 patients . In the RF group , all PVs were successfully isolated with 28.9 ± 6.5 min of RF delivery . In the CB group , a mean of 5.3 ± 1.4 applications/patient was delivered . The proportion of ERAF was similar between the groups . The time-course patterns significantly differed between the groups for high-sensitivity C-reactive protein ( hs-CRP ) value ( P=0.006 ) and myocardial injury markers ( P<0.0001 ) . Greater myocardial injury was observed in the CB than in the RF group ( P<0.0001 ) , whereas the peak hs-CRP value was comparable between the groups . The 2-day post-procedure hs-CRP value was the sole factor correlating with ERAF as identified by the multivariable analysis ( hazard ratio 1.697 ; 95 % confidence interval , 1.005 - 2.865 ; P=0.048 ) in the RF , but not the CB group . CONCLUSIONS The proportion of ERAF was comparable after RF and 2nd-generation CB ablation . Despite CB ablation exhibiting greater myocardial injury than RF ablation , the inflammatory responses were comparable between the groups . The inflammatory response extent predicted ERAF post-RF ablation but not post-CB ablation
Pool analyses indicated that CB ablation was more beneficial in terms of procedural time [ st and ard mean difference = −0.58 ; 95 % confidence interval ( CI ) , −0.85 to −0.30 ] , complications without phrenic nerve injury ( PNI ) [ odds ratio ( OR ) = 0.79 ; 95 % CI , 0.67–0.93 ; I2 = 16 % ] , and recrudescence ( OR = 0.83 ; 95 % CI , 0.70–0.97 ; I2 = 63 % ) for PAF ; however , the total complications of CB was higher than RF .
The subgroup analysis found that , compared with non-contact force radiofrequency ( non-CF-RF ) , both first-generation cryoballoon ( CB1 ) and second-generation cryoballoon ( CB2 ) ablation  could reduce complications with PNI , procedural time , and recrudescence .
However , the safety and efficacy of CB2 was similar to those of CF-RF .
Conclusion Available overall and subgroup data suggested that both CB1 and CB2 were more beneficial than RF ablation , and the main advantages were reflected in comparing them with non-CF-RF .
However , CF-RF and CB2 showed similar clinical benefits
Purpose The present systematic review and meta- analysis aim ed to assess and compare the safety and efficacy of radiofrequency ( RF ) and cryoballoon ( CB ) ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ( PAF ) .
RF and CB ablation are two frequently used methods for pulmonary vein isolation in PAF , but which is a better choice for PAF remains uncertain .