Conclusions and Relevance In this systematic review and meta- analysis , neither intermittent nor daily dosing with st and ard doses of vitamin D alone was associated with reduced risk of fracture , but daily supplementation with both vitamin D and calcium was a more promising strategy
Importance Vitamin D and calcium supplements are recommended for the prevention of fracture , but previous r and omized clinical trials ( RCTs ) have reported conflicting results , with uncertainty about optimal doses and regimens for supplementation and their overall effectiveness .
Objective To assess the risks of fracture associated with differences in concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D ( 25[OH]D ) in observational studies and the risks of fracture associated with supplementation with vitamin D alone or in combination with calcium in RCTs .
Preventing fractures among older people living in institutional care: a pragmatic randomised double blind placebo controlled trial of vitamin D supplementation
Introduction Osteoporotic fractures in older people are a major and increasing public health problem . We examined the effect of vitamin D supplementation on fracture rate in people living in sheltered accommodation . Methods In a pragmatic double blind r and omised controlled trial of 3 years duration , we examined 3,440 people ( 2,624 women and 816 men ) living in residential or care home . We used four-monthly oral supplementation using 100,000 IU vitamin D2 ( ergocalciferol ) . As a main outcome measure , we used the incidence of first fracture using an intention to treat analysis . This was a multicentre study in 314 care homes or sheltered accommodation complexes in South Wales , UK . Results The vitamin D and placebo groups had similar baseline characteristics . In intention-to-treat analysis , 205 first fractures occurred in the intervention group during a total of 2,846 person years of follow-up ( 7 fractures per 100 people per year of follow-up ) , with 218 first fractures in the control group over 2,860 person years of follow-up . The hazard ratio of 0.95 ( 95 % confidence interval 0.79–1.15 ) for intervention compared to control was not statistically significant . ConclusionS upplementation with four-monthly 100,000 IU of oral vitamin D2 is not sufficient to affect fracture incidence among older people living in institutional care
Conclusions and Relevance In this systematic review and meta- analysis , neither intermittent nor daily dosing with st and ard doses of vitamin D alone was associated with reduced risk of fracture , but daily supplementation with both vitamin D and calcium was a more promising strategy
Importance Vitamin D and calcium supplements are recommended for the prevention of fracture , but previous r and omized clinical trials ( RCTs ) have reported conflicting results , with uncertainty about optimal doses and regimens for supplementation and their overall effectiveness .
Objective To assess the risks of fracture associated with differences in concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D ( 25[OH]D ) in observational studies and the risks of fracture associated with supplementation with vitamin D alone or in combination with calcium in RCTs .