Research ers noted small improvements in body mass index immediately after the intervention was provided and at six months , along with improved weight post intervention .
Diabetes knowledge and self efficacy improved immediately following receipt of the intervention , and knowledge also at six months .
The intervention did not improve blood pressure .
Evidence is insufficient to show whether type 2 diabetes self management interventions for people with severe mental illness are effective in improving outcomes .
BACKGROUND People with severe mental illness are twice as likely to develop type 2 diabetes as those without severe mental illness .
Treatment guidelines for type 2 diabetes recommend that structured education should be integrated into routine care and should be offered to all .
However , for people with severe mental illness , physical health may be a low priority , and motivation to change may be limited .
These additional challenges mean that the findings reported in previous systematic review s of diabetes self management interventions may not be generalised to those with severe mental illness , and that tailored approaches to effective diabetes education may be required for this population .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of diabetes self management interventions specifically tailored for people with type 2 diabetes and severe mental illness .
Integrated Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Depression Treatment to Improve Medication Adherence: A Randomized Controlled Trial
PURPOSE Depression commonly accompanies diabetes , result ing in reduced adherence to medications and increased risk for morbidity and mortality . The objective of this study was to examine whether a simple , brief integrated approach to depression and type 2 diabetes mellitus ( type 2 diabetes ) treatment improved adherence to oral hypoglycemic agents and antidepressant medications , glycemic control , and depression among primary care patients . METHODS We undertook a r and omized controlled trial conducted from April 2010 through April 2011 of 180 patients prescribed pharmacotherapy for type 2 diabetes and depression in primary care . Patients were r and omly assigned to an integrated care intervention or usual care . Integrated care managers collaborated with physicians to offer education and guideline -based treatment recommendations and to monitor adherence and clinical status . Adherence was assessed using the Medication Event Monitoring System ( MEMS ) . We used  glycated hemoglobin ( HbA1c ) assays  to measure glycemic control and the 9-item Patient Health Question naire ( PHQ-9 ) to assess depression . RESULTS Intervention and usual care groups did not differ statistically on baseline measures . Patients who received the intervention were more likely to achieve HbA1c levels of less than 7 % ( intervention 60.9 % vs usual care 35.7 % ; P < .001 ) and remission of depression ( PHQ-9 score of less than 5 : intervention 58.7 % vs usual care 30.7 % ; P < .001 ) in comparison with patients in the usual care group at 12 weeks . CONCLUSIONS A r and omized controlled trial of a simple , brief intervention integrating treatment of type 2 diabetes and depression was successful in improving outcomes in primary care . An integrated approach to depression and type 2 diabetes treatment may facilitate its deployment in real-world practice s with competing dem and s for limited re sources
Research ers noted small improvements in body mass index immediately after the intervention was provided and at six months , along with improved weight post intervention .
Diabetes knowledge and self efficacy improved immediately following receipt of the intervention , and knowledge also at six months .
The intervention did not improve blood pressure .
Evidence is insufficient to show whether type 2 diabetes self management interventions for people with severe mental illness are effective in improving outcomes .
BACKGROUND People with severe mental illness are twice as likely to develop type 2 diabetes as those without severe mental illness .
Treatment guidelines for type 2 diabetes recommend that structured education should be integrated into routine care and should be offered to all .
However , for people with severe mental illness , physical health may be a low priority , and motivation to change may be limited .
These additional challenges mean that the findings reported in previous systematic review s of diabetes self management interventions may not be generalised to those with severe mental illness , and that tailored approaches to effective diabetes education may be required for this population .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of diabetes self management interventions specifically tailored for people with type 2 diabetes and severe mental illness .