Further data on specificity comes from electrophysiological studies reporting that  NF effectively changes brain activity patterns .
No safety issues have emerged from clinical trials and NF seems to be well tolerated and accepted .
Follow-up studies support long-term effects of NF .
In conclusion , NF is a valid option for the treatment for ADHD , but further evidence is required to guide its use
Summary Neurofeedback ( NF ) is a training to enhance self-regulatory capacity over brain activity patterns and consequently over brain mental states .
Recent findings suggest that NF is a promising alternative for the treatment of  attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder ( ADHD ) .
Is neurofeedback an efficacious treatment for ADHD? A randomised controlled clinical trial.
BACKGROUND For children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder ( ADHD ) , a reduction of inattention , impulsivity and hyperactivity by neurofeedback ( NF ) has been reported in several studies . But so far , unspecific training effects have not been adequately controlled for and /or studies do not provide sufficient statistical power . To overcome these method ological shortcomings we evaluated the clinical efficacy of neurofeedback in children with ADHD in a multisite r and omised controlled study using a computerised attention skills training as a control condition . METHODS 102 children with ADHD , aged 8 to 12 years , participated in the study . Children performed either 36 sessions of NF training or a computerised attention skills training within two blocks of about four weeks each ( r and omised group assignment ) . The combined NF treatment consisted of one block of theta/beta training and one block of slow cortical potential ( SCP ) training . Pre-training , intermediate and post-training assessment encompassed several behaviour rating scales ( e.g. , the German ADHD rating scale , FBB-HKS ) completed by parents and teachers . Evaluation ( ' placebo ' ) scales were applied to control for parental expectations and satisfaction with the treatment . RESULTS For parent and teacher ratings , improvements in the NF group were superior to those of the control group . For the parent-rated FBB-HKS total score ( primary outcome measure ) , the effect size was .60 . Comparable effects were obtained for the two NF protocol s ( theta/beta training , SCP training ) . Parental attitude towards the treatment did not differ between NF and control group . CONCLUSIONS Superiority of the combined NF training indicates clinical efficacy of NF in children with ADHD . Future studies should further address the specificity of effects and how to optimise the benefit of NF as treatment module for ADHD
Further data on specificity comes from electrophysiological studies reporting that  NF effectively changes brain activity patterns .
No safety issues have emerged from clinical trials and NF seems to be well tolerated and accepted .
Follow-up studies support long-term effects of NF .
In conclusion , NF is a valid option for the treatment for ADHD , but further evidence is required to guide its use
Summary Neurofeedback ( NF ) is a training to enhance self-regulatory capacity over brain activity patterns and consequently over brain mental states .
Recent findings suggest that NF is a promising alternative for the treatment of  attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder ( ADHD ) .