There was no important clinical meaningful benefit .
Adverse effectsWe found very low- quality evidence of the effect of exercise versus either no intervention , or usual care .
We found moderate- to low- quality evidence that exercise programmes probably slightly improve function , may reduce pain , and probably slightly reduce global patient assessment of disease activity , when compared with no intervention , and measured upon completion of the programme .
We found moderate- to low- quality evidence that exercise programmes probably have little or no effect on improving function or reducing pain , when compared with usual care , and may have little or no effect on reducing patient assessment of disease activity , when measured upon completion of the programmes .
We are uncertain whether exercise programmes improve spinal mobility , reduce fatigue , or induce adverse effects
BACKGROUND Exercise programmes are often recommended for managing ankylosing spondylitis ( AS ) , to reduce pain and improve or maintain functional capacity .
OBJECTIVES To assess the benefits and harms of exercise programmes for people with AS .
The development of Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis (part II): validation and final selection
Objective : To vali date and refine two sets of c and i date criteria for the classification/diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis ( SpA ) . Methods : All Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society ( ASAS ) members were invited to include consecutively new patients with chronic ( ⩾3 months ) back pain of unknown origin that began before 45 years of age . The c and i date criteria were first tested in the entire cohort of 649 patients from 25 centres , and then refined in a r and om selection of 40 % of cases and thereafter vali date d in the remaining 60 % . Results : Upon diagnostic work-up , axial SpA was diagnosed in 60.2 % of the cohort . Of these , 70 % did not fulfil modified New York criteria and , therefore , were classified as having “ non-radiographic ” axial SpA. Refinement of the c and i date criteria result ed in new ASAS classification criteria that are defined as : the presence of sacroiliitis by radiography or by magnetic resonance imaging ( MRI ) plus at least one SpA feature ( “ imaging arm ” ) or the presence of HLA-B27 plus at least two SpA features ( “ clinical arm ” ) . The sensitivity and specificity of the entire set of the new criteria were 82.9 % and 84.4 % , and for the imaging arm alone 66.2 % and 97.3 % , respectively . The specificity of the new criteria was much better than that of the European Spondylarthropathy Study Group criteria modified for MRI ( sensitivity 85.1 % , specificity 65.1 % ) and slightly better than that of the modified Amor criteria ( sensitivity 82.9 , specificity 77.5 % ) . Conclusion : The new ASAS classification criteria for axial SpA can reliably classify patients for clinical studies and may help rheumatologists in clinical practice in diagnosing axial SpA in those with chronic back pain . Trial registration number : NCT00328068
There was no important clinical meaningful benefit .
Adverse effectsWe found very low- quality evidence of the effect of exercise versus either no intervention , or usual care .
We found moderate- to low- quality evidence that exercise programmes probably slightly improve function , may reduce pain , and probably slightly reduce global patient assessment of disease activity , when compared with no intervention , and measured upon completion of the programme .
We found moderate- to low- quality evidence that exercise programmes probably have little or no effect on improving function or reducing pain , when compared with usual care , and may have little or no effect on reducing patient assessment of disease activity , when measured upon completion of the programmes .
We are uncertain whether exercise programmes improve spinal mobility , reduce fatigue , or induce adverse effects
BACKGROUND Exercise programmes are often recommended for managing ankylosing spondylitis ( AS ) , to reduce pain and improve or maintain functional capacity .
OBJECTIVES To assess the benefits and harms of exercise programmes for people with AS .