Compared with general anaesthesia , a central neuraxial block may reduce the zero to 30-day mortality for patients undergoing surgery with intermediate to high cardiac risk ( level of evidence , moderate ) .
BACKGROUND Various beneficial effects derived from neuraxial blocks have been reported .
However , it is unclear whether these effects have an influence on perioperative mortality and major pulmonary/cardiovascular complications .
OBJECTIVES Our primary objective was to summarize Cochrane systematic review s that assess the effects of neuraxial blockade on perioperative rates of death , chest infection and myocardial infa rct ion by integrating the evidence from all such review s that have compared neuraxial blockade with or without general anaesthesia versus general anaesthesia alone for different types of surgery in various population s. Our secondary objective was to summarize the evidence on adverse effects ( an adverse event for which a causal relation between the intervention and the event is at least a reasonable possibility ) of neuraxial blockade .
Regional Anesthesia in the Patient Receiving Antithrombotic or Thrombolytic Therapy: American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Evidence-Based Guidelines (Third Edition)
The actual incidence of neurologic dysfunction result ing from hemorrhagic complications associated with neuraxial blockade is unknown . Although the incidence cited in the literature is estimated to be less than 1 in 150,000 epidural and less than 1 in 220,000 spinal anesthetics , recent epidemiologic surveys suggest that the frequency is increasing and may be as high as 1 in 3000 in some patient population s. Overall , the risk of clinical ly significant bleeding increase with age , associated abnormalities of the spinal cord or vertebral column , the presence of an underlying coagulopathy , difficulty during needle placement , and an indwelling neuraxial catheter during sustained anticoagulation ( particularly with st and ard heparin or low-molecular weight heparin ) . The need for prompt diagnosis and intervention to optimize is also consistently reported . In response to these patient safety issues , the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine ( ASRA ) convened its Third Consensus Conference on Regional Anesthesia and Anticoagulation . Practice guidelines or recommendations summarize evidence -based review s. However , the rarity of spinal hematoma defies a prospect i ve r and omized study , and there is no current laboratory model . As a result , the ASRA consensus statements represent the collective experience of recognized experts in the field of neuraxial anesthesia and anticoagulation . These are based on case reports , clinical series , pharmacology , hematology , and risk factors for surgical bleeding . An underst and ing of the complexity of this issue is essential to patient management
Compared with general anaesthesia , a central neuraxial block may reduce the zero to 30-day mortality for patients undergoing surgery with intermediate to high cardiac risk ( level of evidence , moderate ) .
BACKGROUND Various beneficial effects derived from neuraxial blocks have been reported .
However , it is unclear whether these effects have an influence on perioperative mortality and major pulmonary/cardiovascular complications .
OBJECTIVES Our primary objective was to summarize Cochrane systematic review s that assess the effects of neuraxial blockade on perioperative rates of death , chest infection and myocardial infa rct ion by integrating the evidence from all such review s that have compared neuraxial blockade with or without general anaesthesia versus general anaesthesia alone for different types of surgery in various population s. Our secondary objective was to summarize the evidence on adverse effects ( an adverse event for which a causal relation between the intervention and the event is at least a reasonable possibility ) of neuraxial blockade .