Overall , there is little direct evidence for components of ERAS , with much derived from nonesophageal thoracoabdominal surgery .
ERAS in principle seems logical and safe for esophagectomy .
OBJECTIVE This article aims to provide the first systematic review of enhanced recovery after surgery ( ERAS ) programs for  esophagectomy  and generate guidelines .
BACKGROUND ERAS programs use multimodal approaches to reduce complications and accelerate recovery .
Although ERAS is well established in colorectal surgery , experience after esophagectomy has been minimal .
However , esophagectomy remains an extremely high-risk operation , commonly performed in patients with significant comorbidities .
Consequently , ERAS may have a significant role to play in improving outcomes .
No guidelines or review s have been published in esophagectomy .
Goal-directed intraoperative therapy based on autocalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis reduces hospital stay in high-risk surgical patients: a randomized, controlled trial
Introduction Several studies have shown that goal -directed hemodynamic and fluid optimization may result in improved outcome . However , the methods used were either invasive or had other limitations . The aim of this study was to perform intraoperative goal -directed therapy with a minimally invasive , easy to use device ( FloTrac/Vigileo ) , and to evaluate possible improvements in patient outcome determined by the duration of hospital stay and the incidence of complications compared to a st and ard management protocol . Methods In this r and omized , controlled trial 60 high-risk patients scheduled for major abdominal surgery were included . Patients were allocated into either an enhanced hemodynamic monitoring group using a cardiac index based intraoperative optimization protocol ( FloTrac/Vigileo device , GDT-group , n = 30 ) or a st and ard management group ( Control-group , n = 30 ) , based on st and ard monitoring data . Results The median duration of hospital stay was significantly reduced in the GDT-group with 15 ( 12 - 17.75 ) days versus 19 ( 14 - 23.5 ) days ( P = 0.006 ) and fewer patients developed complications than in the Control-group [ 6 patients ( 20 % ) versus 15 patients ( 50 % ) , P = 0.03 ] . The total number of complications was reduced in the GDT-group ( 17 versus 49 complications , P = 0.001 ) . Conclusions In high-risk patients undergoing major abdominal surgery , implementation of an intraoperative goal -directed hemodynamic optimization protocol using the FloTrac/Vigileo device was associated with a reduced length of hospital stay and a lower incidence of complications compared to a st and ard management protocol .Trial Registration Clinical trial registration information : Unique identifier :
Overall , there is little direct evidence for components of ERAS , with much derived from nonesophageal thoracoabdominal surgery .
ERAS in principle seems logical and safe for esophagectomy .
OBJECTIVE This article aims to provide the first systematic review of enhanced recovery after surgery ( ERAS ) programs for  esophagectomy  and generate guidelines .
BACKGROUND ERAS programs use multimodal approaches to reduce complications and accelerate recovery .
Although ERAS is well established in colorectal surgery , experience after esophagectomy has been minimal .
However , esophagectomy remains an extremely high-risk operation , commonly performed in patients with significant comorbidities .
Consequently , ERAS may have a significant role to play in improving outcomes .
No guidelines or review s have been published in esophagectomy .