Where data were available , the relative benefits seen held true both after a single or multiple procedure(s ) .
For patients with persistent atrial fibrillation , CA achieves significantly greater freedom from recurrent atrial fibrillation compared with medical therapy .
BACKGROUND Catheter ablation ( CA ) is commonly performed for persistent atrial fibrillation , but few high- quality r and omized controlled trials ( RCTs ) exist , leading to funding restrictions being proposed in several countries .
We performed a r and om-effects meta- analysis of RCTs and non- RCTs to assess the efficacy of CA for persistent atrial fibrillation .
Substrate modification combined with pulmonary vein isolation improves outcome of catheter ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation: a prospective randomized comparison.
AIMS To investigate the effectiveness of additional substrate modification ( SM ) by left atrial ( LA ) linear lesions as compared with pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) alone in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation ( AF ) in a prospect i ve r and omized study . Percutaneous PVI has evolved as an accepted treatment for paroxysmal AF but seemed to be less effective in patients with persistent AF . The benefit of PVI alone and additional linear lesions has not been vali date d in a r and omized study so far . METHODS AND RESULTS Sixty-two patients with persistent AF ( median duration 7 , range 1 - 18 months ) were r and omly assigned to either PVI alone ( n = 30 ) or additional SM ( n = 32 ) consisting of a roof line connecting both left superior and right superior PV and LA isthmus ablation between left inferior PV and mitral annulus . Procedures including SM were performed using a three-dimensional mapping system ( EnSite NavX , St Jude Medical , St Paul , MN , USA ) . Anti-arrhythmic drugs were discontinued within 8 weeks after ablation in both groups . Follow-up included daily trans-telephonic ECG transmitted irrespective of the patient 's symptoms . PVI was successful in 98 % of all targeted veins in both groups . Additional SM did not increase fluoroscopy time ( 72.1+/-18.7 vs. 72.9+/-17.3 min , P=0.92 ) because of the use of three-dimensional navigation in the PVI+SM group . AF recurrences within the first 4 weeks following ablation were more common after PVI alone ( 77 % ) than additional SM ( 44 % , P=0.002 ) . After a follow-up time of 487 ( 429 - 570 ) days , only 20 % of patients undergoing st and alone PVI  remained in sinus rhythm when compared with 69 % following PVI combined with SM ( P=0.0001 ) . Two patients assigned to PVI+SM experienced procedure-related complications ( cardiac tamponade and minor stroke ) which resolved without sequelae . CONCLUSION PVI alone is insufficient in the treatment of persistent AF . However , additional left linear lesions increase the success rate significantly . Early AF-relapses are associated with a negative outcome after PVI alone but not following additional SM
Where data were available , the relative benefits seen held true both after a single or multiple procedure(s ) .
For patients with persistent atrial fibrillation , CA achieves significantly greater freedom from recurrent atrial fibrillation compared with medical therapy .
BACKGROUND Catheter ablation ( CA ) is commonly performed for persistent atrial fibrillation , but few high- quality r and omized controlled trials ( RCTs ) exist , leading to funding restrictions being proposed in several countries .
We performed a r and om-effects meta- analysis of RCTs and non- RCTs to assess the efficacy of CA for persistent atrial fibrillation .