The ODI remains a valid and vigorous measure and has been a worthwhile outcome measure .
The behavior of the instrument is incompletely understood , particularly in sensitivity to real change .
The Oswestry Disability Index ( ODI ) has become one of the principal condition-specific outcome measures used in the management of spinal disorders .
To review the versions of this instrument , document methods by which it has been vali date d , collate data from scores found in normal and back pain population s , provide curves for power calculations in studies using the ODI , and maintain the ODI as a gold st and ard outcome measure .
It has now been 20 years since its original publication .
Responsiveness of functional status in low back pain: a comparison of different instruments
& NA ; This study compares the responsiveness of three instruments of functional status : two disease‐specific question naires ( Oswestry and Rol and Disability Question naires ) , and a patient‐specific method ( severity of the main complaint ) . We compared changes over time of functional status instruments with pain rated on a visual analog scale . Two strategies for evaluating the responsiveness in terms of sensitivity to change and specificity to change were used : effect size statistics and receiver‐operating characteristic method . We chose global perceived effect as external criterion . A cohort of 81 patients with non‐specific low back pain for at least 6 weeks assessed these measures before and after 5 weeks of treatment . According to the external criterion 38 patients improved . The results of both strategies were the same . All instruments were able to discriminate between improvement and non‐improvement . The effect size statistics of the instruments were higher in the improved group than in the non‐improved group . For each instrument the receiver‐operating characteristic curves showed some discriminative ability . The curves for the Rol and Question naire and pain were closer to the upper left than the curves for the other instruments . The sensitivity to change of the rating of Oswestry Question naire was lower than that of the other instruments . The main complaint was not very specific to change . The two strategies for evaluating the responsiveness were very useful and appeared to complement each other
The ODI remains a valid and vigorous measure and has been a worthwhile outcome measure .
The behavior of the instrument is incompletely understood , particularly in sensitivity to real change .
The Oswestry Disability Index ( ODI ) has become one of the principal condition-specific outcome measures used in the management of spinal disorders .
To review the versions of this instrument , document methods by which it has been vali date d , collate data from scores found in normal and back pain population s , provide curves for power calculations in studies using the ODI , and maintain the ODI as a gold st and ard outcome measure .
It has now been 20 years since its original publication .