The quality of the PROMs varied greatly , with Satisfaction most commonly measured utilizing non-st and ardized locally-devised tools ; the EuroQol five-dimensions question naire ( EuroQoL-5D ) and 36-Item Short-Form ( SF-36 ) cited most frequently to capture QoL ; and the Visual Analogue Scale ( VAS ) to capture Pain .
APPs utilized a multiplicity of PROMs across a range of MSK disorders .
OBJECTIVE Advanced practice physiotherapists ( APPs ) , also known as extended scope physiotherapists , provide a new model of service delivery for musculoskeletal ( MSK ) disorders .
Research to date has largely focused on health service efficiencies , with less emphasis on patient outcomes .
The present systematic review aim ed to identify the  patient-reported outcome measures ( PROMs ) being utilized by APPs .
Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) – validation and comparison to the WOMAC in total knee replacement
Background The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score ( KOOS ) is an extension of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthrtis Index ( WOMAC ) , the most commonly used outcome instrument for assessment of patient-relevant treatment effects in osteoarthritis . KOOS was developed for younger and /or more active patients with knee injury and knee osteoarthritis and has in previous studies on these groups been the more responsive instrument compared to the WOMAC . Some patients eligible for total knee replacement have expectations of more dem and ing physical functions than required for daily living . This encouraged us to study the use of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score ( KOOS ) to assess the outcome of total knee replacement . Methods We studied the test-retest reliability , validity and responsiveness of the Swedish version LK 1.0 of the KOOS when used to prospect ively evaluate the outcome of 105 patients ( mean age 71.3 , 66 women ) after total knee replacement .  The follow-up rates at 6 and 12 months were 92 % and 86 % , respectively . Results The intraclass correlation coefficients were over 0.75 for all subscales indicating sufficient test-retest reliability . Bl and -Altman plots confirmed this finding . Over 90 % of the patients regarded improvement in the subscales Pain , Symptoms , Activities of Daily Living , and knee-related Quality of Life to be extremely or very important when deciding to have their knee operated on indicating good content validity . The correlations found in comparison to the SF-36 indicated the KOOS measured expected constructs . The most responsive subscale was knee-related Quality of Life . The effect sizes of the five KOOS subscales at 12 months ranged from 1.08 to 3.54 and for the WOMAC from 1.65 to 2.56 . Conclusion The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score ( KOOS ) is a valid , reliable , and responsive outcome measure in total joint replacement . In comparison to the WOMAC , the KOOS improved validity and may be at least as responsive as the WOMAC
The quality of the PROMs varied greatly , with Satisfaction most commonly measured utilizing non-st and ardized locally-devised tools ; the EuroQol five-dimensions question naire ( EuroQoL-5D ) and 36-Item Short-Form ( SF-36 ) cited most frequently to capture QoL ; and the Visual Analogue Scale ( VAS ) to capture Pain .
APPs utilized a multiplicity of PROMs across a range of MSK disorders .
OBJECTIVE Advanced practice physiotherapists ( APPs ) , also known as extended scope physiotherapists , provide a new model of service delivery for musculoskeletal ( MSK ) disorders .
Research to date has largely focused on health service efficiencies , with less emphasis on patient outcomes .
The present systematic review aim ed to identify the  patient-reported outcome measures ( PROMs ) being utilized by APPs .