Thus , WIs were seldom design ed to improve return-to-work .
Overall , there was low quality evidence that showed no significant differences between WIs and no intervention for pain prevalence or severity .
If present , significant results in favour of WIs were not sustained across follow-up times .
Overall , this review found low quality evidence that neither supported nor refuted the benefits of any specific WI for pain relief and moderate quality evidence that a multiple-component intervention reduced sickness absence in the intermediate-term , which was not sustained over time .
BACKGROUND Musculoskeletal disorders are the most common cause of disability in many industrial countries .
Recurrent and chronic pain accounts for a substantial portion of workers ' absenteeism .
Neck pain seems to be more prominent in the general population than previously known .
OBJECTIVES To determine the effectiveness of workplace interventions ( WIs ) in adult workers with neck pain .
Cost-effectiveness of multidisciplinary treatment in sick-listed patients with upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders: a randomized, controlled trial with one-year follow-up
Objective : To determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a return-to-work outpatient multidisciplinary treatment programme for sick-listed workers with non-specific upper extremity musculoskeletal complaints . Methods : A r and omized controlled trial with a 1-year follow-up was carried out . Thirty-eight subjects were allocated to multidisciplinary treatment ( intervention , n=23 ) , or to usual care provided by occupational health services ( n=15 ) . The intervention consisted of psychological and physical sessions provided by a medical specialist , a psychologist , a physiotherapist and an occupational therapist . It aims at reconditioning , “ de-medicalizing ” , unrestrained moving and return-to-work . The intervention process was evaluated on compliance to the protocol and the effectiveness of its components . The individual outcome variable was the severity of complaints . The societal outcomes included return-to-work and costs . Measurements were performed at baseline and after 2 , 6 and 12 months . Mixed model analyses were used for analysis . Results : The intervention achieves its aims : physical disabilities ( P=0.039 ) , kinesiophobia ( P<0.001 ) and physical functioning ( P=0.016 ) improved significantly as compared to usual care . In addition , the intervention was significantly more effective in reducing the severity of complaints than usual care . The intervention was equally effective compared to usual care in terms of return-to-work ( 86 % in the intervention group vs. 73 % in the usual care group ) . The extra total costs and the extra gains in terms of return-to-work were not significantly higher for the intervention as compared to usual care after 12 months . Conclusion : Multidisciplinary treatment affects individuals positively , but shows no significant difference in ( cost- ) effectiveness on the societal level as compared to usual care
Thus , WIs were seldom design ed to improve return-to-work .
Overall , there was low quality evidence that showed no significant differences between WIs and no intervention for pain prevalence or severity .
If present , significant results in favour of WIs were not sustained across follow-up times .
Overall , this review found low quality evidence that neither supported nor refuted the benefits of any specific WI for pain relief and moderate quality evidence that a multiple-component intervention reduced sickness absence in the intermediate-term , which was not sustained over time .
BACKGROUND Musculoskeletal disorders are the most common cause of disability in many industrial countries .
Recurrent and chronic pain accounts for a substantial portion of workers ' absenteeism .
Neck pain seems to be more prominent in the general population than previously known .
OBJECTIVES To determine the effectiveness of workplace interventions ( WIs ) in adult workers with neck pain .