Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
Home-based physical activity intervention for breast cancer patients.
PURPOSE The efficacy of a home-based physical activity ( PA ) intervention for early-stage breast cancer patients was evaluated in a r and omized controlled trial . PATIENTS AND METHODS Eighty-six sedentary women ( mean age , 53.14 years ; st and ard deviation , 9.70 years ) who had completed treatment for stage 0 to II breast cancer were r and omly assigned to a PA or contact control group . Participants in the PA group received 12 weeks of PA counseling ( based on the Transtheoretical Model ) delivered via telephone , as well as weekly exercise tip sheets . Assessment s were conducted at baseline , after treatment ( 12 weeks ) , and 6 and 9 month after baseline follow-ups . The post-treatment outcomes are reported here . RESULTS Analyses showed that , after treatment , the PA group reported significantly more total minutes of PA , more minutes of moderate-intensity PA , and higher energy expenditure per week than controls . The PA group also out-performed controls on a field test of fitness . Changes in PA were not reflected in objective activity monitoring . The PA group was more likely than controls to progress in motivational readiness for PA and to meet PA guidelines . No significant group differences were found in body mass index and percent body fat . Post-treatment group comparisons revealed significant improvements in vigor and a reduction in fatigue in the PA group . There was a positive trend in intervention effects on overall mood and body esteem . CONCLUSION The intervention successfully increased PA and improved fitness and specific aspects of psychological well-being among early-stage breast cancer patients . The success of a home-based PA intervention has important implication s for promoting recovery in this population
Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?