There is limited evidence to suggest which ablation method was the best .
There is limited evidence to suggest that CA may be a better treatment option compared to medical therapies in the management of persistent AF .
This review was also unable to recommend the best CA method
BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia seen in cardiovascular departments .
Treatments include medical interventions and catheter ablation .
Due to uncertainties in medical therapies for AF , and the need to continue sinus rhythm , ablation has been recently considered as a viable alternative .
Many new ablation methods based on pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) have been developed .
OBJECTIVES The primary objective of this review was to assess the beneficial and harmful effects of  catheter ablation ( CA ) in comparison with medical treatment in patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF .
The secondary objective was to determine the best regimen of CA .
Does electrogram guided substrate ablation add to the success of pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation? A prospective, randomized study.
INTRODUCTION Pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) is an established treatment for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ( AF ) . The ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms ( CFAE ) has emerged as a novel treatment approach . We sought to evaluate the additional effect of CFAE ablation to PVI in paroxysmal AF . METHODS AND RESULTS Ninety-eight patients with paroxysmal AF ( 57 + /- 10 years , 74 male ) were r and omized to the PVI ( n = 48 ) or PVI + CFAE group ( n = 50 ) . After PVI , CFAE ablation was performed in patients with inducible AF in the PVI + CFAE group . The primary endpoint was combined objective ( 7-day Holter ECG ) and subjective ( symptoms ) freedom of atrial tachyarrhythmia 3 months after ablation . Long-term follow-up ( 19 + /- 8 months ) was available in 94 of 98 patients . CFAE ablation was performed in 30 of 50 patients of the PVI + CFAE group . After 3 months , 36 of 48 patients ( 75 % ) in the PVI group and 38 of 50 patients ( 76 % ) in the PVI + CFAE group were in stable sinus rhythm ( P = NS ) . During long-term follow-up ( 19 + /- 8 months ) , 34 of 46 patients ( 74 % ) in the PVI group and 40 of 48 patients ( 83 % ) in the PVI + CFAE group were in sinus rhythm ( P = 0.08 ) . In a subgroup analysis , a significantly better long-term outcome was achieved if inducible AF after PVI had been treated by additional CFAE ablation as compared with PVI only ( sinus rhythm in 25/28 patients ; 89 % vs 22/30 patients 73 % ; P = 0.003 ) . CONCLUSION In the intention-to-treat analysis , additional CFAE ablation did not improve the success rate of PVI in patients with paroxysmal AF . However , during long-term follow-up , patients with still inducible AF after PVI seemed to profit from additional CFAE ablation
There is limited evidence to suggest which ablation method was the best .
There is limited evidence to suggest that CA may be a better treatment option compared to medical therapies in the management of persistent AF .
This review was also unable to recommend the best CA method
BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia seen in cardiovascular departments .
Treatments include medical interventions and catheter ablation .
Due to uncertainties in medical therapies for AF , and the need to continue sinus rhythm , ablation has been recently considered as a viable alternative .
Many new ablation methods based on pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) have been developed .
OBJECTIVES The primary objective of this review was to assess the beneficial and harmful effects of  catheter ablation ( CA ) in comparison with medical treatment in patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF .
The secondary objective was to determine the best regimen of CA .