Intervention-only programmes were in general more cost effective than programmes that also included a screening component .
The longer the period evaluated , the more cost-effective interventions appeared .
There was insufficient evidence to answer the question of ( 1 ) whether lifestyle programmes are more cost effective than metformin or ( 2 ) whether low-intensity lifestyle interventions are more cost effective than the more intensive lifestyle programmes that were tested in trials .
OBJECTIVE Explore the cost-effectiveness of lifestyle interventions and metformin in reducing subsequent incidence of type 2 diabetes  , both alone and in combination with a screening programme to identify high-risk individuals .
Effectiveness of mobile phone messaging in prevention of type 2 diabetes by lifestyle modification in men in India: a prospective, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial.
BACKGROUND Type 2 diabetes can often be prevented by lifestyle modification ; however , successful lifestyle intervention programmes are labour intensive . Mobile phone messaging is an inexpensive alternative way to deliver educational and motivational advice about lifestyle modification . We aim ed to assess whether mobile phone messaging that encouraged lifestyle change could reduce incident type 2 diabetes  in Indian Asian men with impaired glucose tolerance . METHODS We did a prospect i ve , parallel-group , r and omised controlled trial between Aug 10 , 2009 , and Nov 30 , 2012 , at ten sites in southeast India . Working Indian men ( aged 35 - 55 years ) with impaired glucose tolerance were r and omly assigned ( 1:1 ) with a computer-generated r and omisation sequence to a mobile phone messaging intervention or st and ard care ( control group ) . Participants in the intervention group received frequent mobile phone messages compared with controls who received st and ard lifestyle modification advice at baseline only . Field staff and participants were , by necessity , not masked to study group assignment , but allocation was concealed from laboratory personnel as well as principal and co-investigators . The primary outcome was incidence of type 2 diabetes , analysed by intention to treat . This trial is registered with Clinical Trials.gov , number NCT00819455 . RESULTS We assessed 8741 participants for eligibility . 537 patients were r and omly assigned to either the mobile phone messaging intervention ( n=271 ) or st and ard care ( n=266 ) . The cumulative incidence of type 2 diabetes was lower in those who received mobile phone messages than in controls : 50 ( 18 % ) participants in the intervention group developed type 2 diabetes compared with 73 ( 27 % ) in the control group ( hazard ratio 0·64 , 95 % CI 0·45 - 0·92 ; p=0·015 ) . The number needed to treat to prevent one case of type 2 diabetes was 11 ( 95 % CI 6 - 55 ) . One patient in the control group died suddenly at the end of the first year . We recorded no other serious adverse events . INTERPRETATION Mobile phone messaging is an effective and acceptable method to deliver advice and support towards lifestyle modification to prevent type 2 diabetes in men at high risk . FUNDING The UK India Education and Research Initiative , the World Diabetes Foundation
Intervention-only programmes were in general more cost effective than programmes that also included a screening component .
The longer the period evaluated , the more cost-effective interventions appeared .
There was insufficient evidence to answer the question of ( 1 ) whether lifestyle programmes are more cost effective than metformin or ( 2 ) whether low-intensity lifestyle interventions are more cost effective than the more intensive lifestyle programmes that were tested in trials .
OBJECTIVE Explore the cost-effectiveness of lifestyle interventions and metformin in reducing subsequent incidence of type 2 diabetes  , both alone and in combination with a screening programme to identify high-risk individuals .