Surgery results in greater improvement in weight loss outcomes and weight associated comorbidities compared with non-surgical interventions , regardless of the type of procedures used .
When compared with each other , certain procedures result ed in greater weight loss and improvements in comorbidities than others .
Outcomes were similar between RYGB and sleeve gastrectomy , and both of these procedures had better outcomes than adjustable gastric b and ing .
For people with very high BMI , biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch result ed in greater weight loss than RYGB .
Isolated sleeve gastrectomy led to better weight-loss outcomes than adjustable gastric b and ing after three years follow-up .
BACKGROUND Bariatric ( weight loss ) surgery for obesity is considered when other treatments have failed .
The effects of the available bariatric procedures compared with medical management and with each other are uncertain .
This is an up date of a Cochrane review first published in 2003 and most recently up date d in 2009 .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of bariatric surgery for overweight and obesity , including the control of comorbidities .
A Prospective Randomized Trial of Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass Versus Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding for the Treatment of Morbid Obesity: Outcomes, Quality of Life, and Costs
Background : Gastric bypass and adjustable gastric b and ing are the 2 most commonly performed bariatric procedures for the treatment of morbid obesity . The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes , quality of life , and costs of laparoscopic gastric bypass versus laparoscopic gastric b and ing . Study Design : Between 2002 and 2007 , 250 patients with a body mass index of 35 to 60 kg/m2 were r and omly assigned to gastric bypass or gastric b and ing . After exclusion , 111 patients underwent gastric bypass and 86 patients underwent gastric b and ing .  Outcome measures included demographic data , operative time , blood loss , length of hospital stay , morbidity , mortality , early and late reoperation rate , weight loss , changes in quality of life , and cost . Treatment failure was defined as losing less than 20 % of excess weight or conversion to another bariatric operation for failure of weight loss . Results : There were no deaths at 90 days in either group . The mean body mass index was higher in the gastric bypass group ( 47.5 vs. 45.5 kg/m2 , respectively , P < 0.01 ) while the mean age was higher in the gastric b and group ( 45 vs. 41 years , respectively , P < 0.01 ) . Compared with gastric b and ing , operative blood loss was higher and the mean operative time and length of stay were longer in the gastric bypass group . The 30-day complication rate was higher after gastric bypass ( 21.6 % vs. 7.0 % for gastric b and ) ; however , there were no life-threatening complications such as leaks or sepsis . The most frequent late complication in the gastric bypass group was stricture ( 14.3 % ) . The 1-year mortality was 0.9 % for the gastric bypass group and 0 % for the gastric b and group . The percent of excess weight loss at 4 years was higher in the gastric bypass group ( 68 ± 19 % vs. 45 ± 28 % , respectively , P < 0.05 ) . Treatment failure occurred in 16.7 % of the patients who underwent gastric b and ing and in 0 % of those who underwent gastric bypass , with male gender being a predictive factor for poor weight loss after gastric b and ing . At 1-year postsurgery , quality of life improved in both groups to that of US norms . The total cost was higher for gastric bypass as compared with gastric b and ing procedure ( $ 12,310 vs. $ 10,766 , respectively , P < 0.01 ) . Conclusions : Laparoscopic gastric bypass and gastric b and ing are both safe and effective approaches for the treatment of morbid obesity . Gastric bypass result ed in better weight loss at medium- and long-term follow-up but was associated with more perioperative and late complications and a higher 30-day readmission rate . There was a wide variation in weight loss after gastric b and ing with a small proportion of patients considered as treatment failure , and male gender was a predictive factor for poor weight loss
Surgery results in greater improvement in weight loss outcomes and weight associated comorbidities compared with non-surgical interventions , regardless of the type of procedures used .
When compared with each other , certain procedures result ed in greater weight loss and improvements in comorbidities than others .
Outcomes were similar between RYGB and sleeve gastrectomy , and both of these procedures had better outcomes than adjustable gastric b and ing .
For people with very high BMI , biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch result ed in greater weight loss than RYGB .
Isolated sleeve gastrectomy led to better weight-loss outcomes than adjustable gastric b and ing after three years follow-up .
BACKGROUND Bariatric ( weight loss ) surgery for obesity is considered when other treatments have failed .
The effects of the available bariatric procedures compared with medical management and with each other are uncertain .
This is an up date of a Cochrane review first published in 2003 and most recently up date d in 2009 .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of bariatric surgery for overweight and obesity , including the control of comorbidities .