Conclusion Rotary instrumentation shows equivalent cleaning efficiency than h and files depending on the system of instrumentation and techniques used .
However , use of rotary in primary teeth leads to improved shaping of canals providing better quality of treatment in less time .
Aim To develop a scientifically current and evidence based protocol on the efficacy of rotary and h and root canal instrumentation in primary teeth .
How to cite this article Panchal V , Jeevan and an G , et al. Comparison between the Effectiveness of Rotary and Manual Instrumentation in Primary Teeth : A Systematic Review .
In vitro investigation of the cleaning efficacy, shaping ability, preparation time and file deformation of continuous rotary, reciprocating rotary and manual instrumentations in primary molars
Background . Efficient canal preparation is the key to successful root canal treatment . This study aim ed to assess the cleaning and shaping ability , preparation time and file deformation of rotary , reciprocating and manual instrumentation in canal preparation of primary molars . Methods . The mesiobuccal canals of 64 extracted primary m and ibular second molars were injected with India ink . The sample s were r and omly divided into one control and three experimental groups . Experimental groups were instrumented with K-file , Mtwo in continuous rotation and Reciproc in reciprocating motion , respectively . The control group received no treatment . The files were discarded after four applications . Shaping ability was evaluated using CBCT . After clearing , ink removal was scored . Preparation time and file fracture or deformation was also recorded . Data were analyzed with SPSS 19 using chi-squared , Fisher ’s exact test , Kruskal-Wallis and post hoc tests at a significance level of 0.05 . Results . Considering cleanliness , at coronal third Reciproc was better than K-file ( P < 0.001 ) , but not more effective than Mtwo ( P = 0.080 ) . Furthermore , Mtwo leaved the canal cleaner than K-file ( P = 0.001 ) . In the middle third , only Reciproc exhibited better cleaning efficacy than K-file ( P = 0.005 ) . In the apical third , no difference was detected between the groups ( P = 0.794 ) . Regarding shaping ability , no differences were found between Reciproc and Mtwo ( P = 1.00 ) . Meanwhile , both displayed better shaping efficacy than K-file ( P < 0.05 ) . Between each two groups , there were differences in preparation time ( P < 0.05 ) , with Reciproc being the fastest . No file failure occurred . Conclusion . Fast and sufficient cleaning and shaping could be achieved with Mtwo and especially with Reciproc
Conclusion Rotary instrumentation shows equivalent cleaning efficiency than h and files depending on the system of instrumentation and techniques used .
However , use of rotary in primary teeth leads to improved shaping of canals providing better quality of treatment in less time .
Aim To develop a scientifically current and evidence based protocol on the efficacy of rotary and h and root canal instrumentation in primary teeth .
How to cite this article Panchal V , Jeevan and an G , et al. Comparison between the Effectiveness of Rotary and Manual Instrumentation in Primary Teeth : A Systematic Review .