Finally , muscle power testing was found to be safe in older people with a broad range of health and functional states
Background Muscle power has been proposed to be the primary therapeutic target for resistance training interventions aim ed at enhancing physical function in older adults .
However , no recommendations exist on ideal testing protocol s to assess muscle power in older adults , and the safety of this procedure has not been adequately evaluated in the literature .
Methods A systematic review was conducted to identify studies evaluating muscle power exerted by older people in resistance exercises through May 2017 .
High-speed circuit training vs hypertrophy training to improve physical function in sarcopenic obese adults: A randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND Progressive loss of muscle and strength with age is often coincident with increases in adiposity , leading to a condition called sarcopenic obesity . Studies have shown sarcopenic obese adults to be at higher risk for declines in physical function . Despite this rising public health concern , no intervention studies currently exist in this population . METHODS A total of 21 sarcopenic obese adults , 60 years or older , were r and omized into two groups , strength/hypertrophy ( SH , n=9 ) and high-speed circuit ( HSC , n=8 ) and were trained for 15 weeks . The primary outcome was the SPPB modified as a measure of physical function , assessed by assessors blinded to r and omization . Secondary outcomes were lower body and upper body power and strength , instrumental activities of daily living ( IADL ) , ratings of perceived exertion ( RPE ) , body fat % ( BF% ) , skeletal muscle index ( SMI ) , and grip strength ( GRP ) . RESULTS For the SPPB results favored HSC over SH ( 1.1 , 95 % CI ( -.1 to 2.4 ) , p=.08 ) and showed a moderate effect size ( Hedge g=0.6 , 95 % CI ( -0.4 , 1.6 ) ) . For secondary outcomes , lower body power ( mean difference=158 W , 95 % CI ( 2 , 315 ) ; p=.01 ) and RPE ( mean difference=-1.5 , 95 % CI ( -2.9 , -0.12 ) ; p=.04 ) also favored HSC . IADL , SMI , BF% , upper and lower body strength and upper body power , showed no statistically significant differences between groups . CONCLUSIONS Considering the moderate effect size , the large treatment effect shown by the upper limit of the 95 % CI , the low perceived exertion , and no adverse effects , HSC training should be further investigated with a larger sample size in sarcopenic obese adults
Finally , muscle power testing was found to be safe in older people with a broad range of health and functional states
Background Muscle power has been proposed to be the primary therapeutic target for resistance training interventions aim ed at enhancing physical function in older adults .
However , no recommendations exist on ideal testing protocol s to assess muscle power in older adults , and the safety of this procedure has not been adequately evaluated in the literature .
Methods A systematic review was conducted to identify studies evaluating muscle power exerted by older people in resistance exercises through May 2017 .