Summary / conclusions The SCAT is the most widely accepted and deployable sport concussion assessment and screening tool currently available .
There is some degree of support for using the SCAT2/SCAT3 and ChildSCAT3 in the evaluation of SRC , with and without baseline data .
The addition of an oculomotor examination seems indicated , although the most valid method for assessing oculomotor function is not clear .
Video-observable signs of concussion show promise , but there is insufficient evidence to warrant widespread use at this time
Objectives Several iterations of the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool ( SCAT ) have been published over the past 16 years .
Our goal was to systematic ally review the literature related to the SCAT and provide recommendations for improving the tool .
Return to play after an initial or recurrent concussion in a prospective study of physician-observed junior ice hockey concussions: implications for return to play after a concussion.
OBJECT The authors investigated return-to-play duration for initial and recurrent concussion in the same season in 2 teams of junior ( 16 - 21-year-old ) ice hockey players during a regular season . METHODS The authors conducted a prospect i ve cohort study during 1 junior regular season ( 2009 - 2010 ) of 67 male fourth-tier ice hockey players ( mean age 18.2 ± 1.2 years [ SD ] , range 16 - 21 years ) from 2 teams . Prior to the start of the season , every player underwent baseline assessment s that were determined using the  Sideline Concussion Assessment Tool 2 ( SCAT2 ) and the Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Test ( ImPACT ) . The study protocol also required players who entered the study during the season to complete a baseline SCAT2 and ImPACT . If the protocol was not followed , the postinjury test results of a player without true baseline test results were compared with previously established age- and sex-matched group normative levels . Each game was directly observed by a physician and at least 1 neutral nonphysician observer . Players suspected of suffering a concussion were evaluated by the physician during the game . If a concussion was diagnosed , the player underwent clinical evaluation at the physician 's office within 24 hours . The return-to-play decision was based on clinical evaluation guided by the Zurich return-to-play protocol ( contained in the consensus statement of international expert opinion at the 3rd International Conference on Concussion in Sport held in Zurich , November 2008 ) . This clinical evaluation and return-to-play protocol was augmented by the 2 tests ( SCAT2 and ImPACT ) also recommended by the Zurich consensus statement , for which baseline values had been obtained . RESULTS Seventeen players sustained a physician-observed or self-reported , physician-diagnosed concussion during a physician-observed ice hockey game . The mean clinical return-to-play duration ( in 15 cases ) was 12.8 ± 7.02 days ( median 10 days , range 7 - 29 days ) ; the mean number of physician office visits by players who suffered a concussion ( 15 cases ) was 2.1 ± 1.29 ( median 1.5 visits ) . Five of the 17 players who sustained a concussion also suffered a recurrent or second concussion . One of the 5 individuals who suffered a repeat concussion sustained his initial concussion in a regular season game that was not observed by a physician , and as a result this single case was not included in the total of 21 concussions . This initial concussion of the player was identified during baseline testing 2 days after the injury and was subsequently medically diagnosed and treated . The mean interval between the first and second concussions in these 5 players was 78.6 ± 39.8 days ( median 82 days ) , and the mean time between the return-to-play date of the first and second concussions was 61.8 ± 39.7 days ( median 60 days ) . CONCLUSIONS The mean rates of return to play for single and recurrent concussions were higher than rates cited in recent studies involving sport concussions . The time interval between the first and second concussions was also greater than previously cited . This difference may be the result of the methodology of direct independent physician observation , diagnosis , and adherence to the Zurich return-to-play protocol
Summary / conclusions The SCAT is the most widely accepted and deployable sport concussion assessment and screening tool currently available .
There is some degree of support for using the SCAT2/SCAT3 and ChildSCAT3 in the evaluation of SRC , with and without baseline data .
The addition of an oculomotor examination seems indicated , although the most valid method for assessing oculomotor function is not clear .
Video-observable signs of concussion show promise , but there is insufficient evidence to warrant widespread use at this time
Objectives Several iterations of the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool ( SCAT ) have been published over the past 16 years .
Our goal was to systematic ally review the literature related to the SCAT and provide recommendations for improving the tool .