Pooled net change in systolic blood pressure ( 16 trials ) was -1.86 ( 95 % CI -3.17 to -0.55 ; p=0.01 ) mm Hg ; diastolic blood pressure ( 15 trials ) , -1.53 ( -2.43 to -0.62 ; p=0.001 ) mm Hg ; body mass index ( 14 trials ) , -0.13 ( -0.26 to -0.01 ; p=0.04 ) kg/m2 ; serum total cholesterol ( 14 trials ) , -0.13 ( -0.19 to -0.07 ; p<0.001 ) mmol/L. There was no significant association between interventions with a reported theoretical basis and improved intervention outcomes .
No association was observed between intervention intensity ( number of sessions and intervention duration ) and intervention outcomes .
MHBC interventions delivered to CVD-free participants in primary care did not appear to have quantitatively important effects on CVD risk factors .
BACKGROUND It is uncertain whether multiple health behaviour change ( MHBC ) interventions are effective for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease ( CVD ) in primary care .
Involving patients in cardiovascular risk management with nurse-led clinics: a cluster randomized controlled trial
Background : Preventive guidelines on cardiovascular risk management recommend lifestyle changes . Support for lifestyle changes may be a useful task for practice nurses , but the effect of such interventions in primary prevention is not clear . We examined the effect of involving patients in nurse-led cardiovascular risk management on lifestyle adherence and cardiovascular risk . Methods : We performed a cluster r and omized controlled trial in 25 practice s that included 615 patients . The intervention consisted of nurse-led cardiovascular risk management , including risk assessment , risk communication , a decision aid and adapted motivational interviewing . The control group received a minimal nurse-led intervention . The self-reported outcome measures at one year were smoking , alcohol use , diet and physical activity . Nurses assessed 10-year cardiovascular mortality risk after one year . Results : There were no significant differences between the intervention groups . The effect of the intervention on the consumption of vegetables and physical activity was small , and some differences were only significant for subgroups . The effects of the intervention on the intake of fat , fruit and alcohol and smoking were not significant . We found no effect between the groups for cardiovascular 10-year risk . Interpretation : Nurse-led risk communication , use of a decision aid and adapted motivational interviewing did not lead to relevant differences between the groups in terms of lifestyle changes or cardiovascular risk , despite significant within-group differences
Pooled net change in systolic blood pressure ( 16 trials ) was -1.86 ( 95 % CI -3.17 to -0.55 ; p=0.01 ) mm Hg ; diastolic blood pressure ( 15 trials ) , -1.53 ( -2.43 to -0.62 ; p=0.001 ) mm Hg ; body mass index ( 14 trials ) , -0.13 ( -0.26 to -0.01 ; p=0.04 ) kg/m2 ; serum total cholesterol ( 14 trials ) , -0.13 ( -0.19 to -0.07 ; p<0.001 ) mmol/L. There was no significant association between interventions with a reported theoretical basis and improved intervention outcomes .
No association was observed between intervention intensity ( number of sessions and intervention duration ) and intervention outcomes .
MHBC interventions delivered to CVD-free participants in primary care did not appear to have quantitatively important effects on CVD risk factors .
BACKGROUND It is uncertain whether multiple health behaviour change ( MHBC ) interventions are effective for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease ( CVD ) in primary care .