PRT had a large positive effect on strength ( 41 trials , 1955 participants ) , but there was statistical heterogeneity that was not explained by differences in study quality , participant characteristics or the exercise program .
REVIEW ER 'S CONCLUSIONS PRT appears to be an effective intervention to increase strength in older people and has a positive effect on some functional limitations .
However , the effect of this intervention on more substantive outcomes such as measures of disability or HRQOL remains unclear .
BACKGROUND Muscle weakness in old age , is associated with physical disability and an increased risk of falls .
Progressive resistance strength ( PRT ) training exercises ( i.e. movements performed against a specific external force that is regularly increased during training ) are design ed to increase strength in older people .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effect of PRT on measures of physical disability , functional limitation and impairment in older people  , and identify adverse events .
Effects of resistive and balance exercises on isokinetic strength in older persons.
OBJECTIVE To determine the safety and efficacy of 3 months of resistive training of multiple lower extremity muscle groups compared with balance training in persons over 75 years . DESIGN R and omized 3-month clinical trial . Subjects ( n = 110 , mean age 80 ) were r and omized to 4 groups in a 2 x 2 design ( control , resistive , balance , combined resistive/balance ) . INTERVENTIONS Resistive training involved knee extension and flexion , hip abduction and extension , and plantar and dorsiflexion using simple resistive machines and s and bags . Balance training consisted of exercises to improve postural control . The control group attended 5 health-related discussion sessions . MEASUREMENTS Summed isokinetic moments ( N m ) of 8 leg movements : hip , knee and ankle flexion/extension , and hip abduction/adduction . Secondary outcomes were gait velocity and chair rise time . MAIN RESULTS Summed peak moment increased in both resistive exercise-trained groups ( 13 % increase in the resistive group and 21 % in the combined training group , P < 0.001 ) . The effect of resistance training was significant ( MANOVA F = 21.1 , P < 0.001 ) , but balance training did not improve strength , and there was no interaction ( positive or negative ) between balance and resistive training . Maximal gait velocity and chair rise time did not improve . Eleven subjects ( 20 % ) had musculoskeletal complaints related to resistive training , but all were able to complete the program with modifications . CONCLUSION Resistive training using simple equipment is an effective and acceptable method to increase overall leg strength in older persons .  Resistive or balance training did not improve maximal gait velocity or chair rise time in this sample of relatively healthy older persons
PRT had a large positive effect on strength ( 41 trials , 1955 participants ) , but there was statistical heterogeneity that was not explained by differences in study quality , participant characteristics or the exercise program .
REVIEW ER 'S CONCLUSIONS PRT appears to be an effective intervention to increase strength in older people and has a positive effect on some functional limitations .
However , the effect of this intervention on more substantive outcomes such as measures of disability or HRQOL remains unclear .
BACKGROUND Muscle weakness in old age , is associated with physical disability and an increased risk of falls .
Progressive resistance strength ( PRT ) training exercises ( i.e. movements performed against a specific external force that is regularly increased during training ) are design ed to increase strength in older people .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effect of PRT on measures of physical disability , functional limitation and impairment in older people  , and identify adverse events .