The Frailty Index was examined in almost all these dimensions , with the exception of reliability , and its diagnostic and predictive characteristics were shown to be satisfactory .
Gait speed showed high sensitivity , but only moderate specificity , and excellent predictive ability for future disability in activities of daily living .
The Tilburg Frailty Indicator was shown to be a reliable and valid measure for frailty screening , but its diagnostic accuracy was not evaluated .
Screening Letter , Timed-up- and -go test and PRISMA 7 ( Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review s and Meta-Analyses ) demonstrated high sensitivity and moderate specificity for identifying frailty .
In general , low physical activity , variously measured , was one of the most powerful predictors of future decline in activities of daily living .
Conclusion Only a few frailty measures seem to be demonstrably valid , reliable and diagnostically accurate , and have good predictive ability .
Nevertheless , it was clear that no suitable tool for assessing frailty appropriately in emergency departments was identified
Background A scoping search identified systematic review s on diagnostic accuracy and predictive ability of frailty measures in older adults .
In most cases , research was confined to specific assessment measures related to a specific clinical model .
Objectives To summarize the best available evidence from systematic review s in relation to reliability , validity , diagnostic accuracy and predictive ability of frailty measures in older adults .
A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people
Background : There is no single generally accepted clinical definition of frailty . Previously developed tools to assess frailty that have been shown to be predictive of death or need for entry into an institutional facility have not gained acceptance among practising clinicians . We aim ed to develop a tool that would be both predictive and easy to use . Methods : We developed the 7-point Clinical Frailty Scale and applied it and other established tools that measure frailty to 2305 elderly patients who participated in the second stage of the Canadian Study of Health and Aging ( CSHA ) . We followed this cohort prospect ively ; after 5 years , we determined the ability of the Clinical Frailty Scale to predict death or need for institutional care , and correlated the results with those obtained from other established tools . Results : The CSHA Clinical Frailty Scale was highly correlated ( r = 0.80 ) with the Frailty Index . Each 1-category increment of our scale significantly increased the medium-term risks of death ( 21.2 % within about 70 mo , 95 % confidence interval [ CI ] 12.5%–30.6 % ) and entry into an institution ( 23.9 % , 95 % CI 8.8%–41.2 % ) in multivariable models that adjusted for age , sex and education . Analyses of receiver operating characteristic curves showed that our Clinical Frailty Scale performed better than measures of cognition , function or comorbidity in assessing risk for death ( area under the curve 0.77 for 18-month and 0.70 for 70-month mortality ) . Interpretation : Frailty is a valid and clinical ly important construct that is recognizable by physicians . Clinical judgments about frailty can yield useful predictive information
The Frailty Index was examined in almost all these dimensions , with the exception of reliability , and its diagnostic and predictive characteristics were shown to be satisfactory .
Gait speed showed high sensitivity , but only moderate specificity , and excellent predictive ability for future disability in activities of daily living .
The Tilburg Frailty Indicator was shown to be a reliable and valid measure for frailty screening , but its diagnostic accuracy was not evaluated .
Screening Letter , Timed-up- and -go test and PRISMA 7 ( Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review s and Meta-Analyses ) demonstrated high sensitivity and moderate specificity for identifying frailty .
In general , low physical activity , variously measured , was one of the most powerful predictors of future decline in activities of daily living .
Conclusion Only a few frailty measures seem to be demonstrably valid , reliable and diagnostically accurate , and have good predictive ability .
Nevertheless , it was clear that no suitable tool for assessing frailty appropriately in emergency departments was identified
Background A scoping search identified systematic review s on diagnostic accuracy and predictive ability of frailty measures in older adults .
In most cases , research was confined to specific assessment measures related to a specific clinical model .
Objectives To summarize the best available evidence from systematic review s in relation to reliability , validity , diagnostic accuracy and predictive ability of frailty measures in older adults .