On the contrary , the largest study of this review did not demonstrate any adverse effect of  DM on MWD and FWD after SET .
In conclusion , the data evaluating the effects of DM on SET were inadequate to determine if DM impairs the exercise response .
Some believe that certain patients with intermittent claudication may be unsuitable for supervised exercise therapy ( SET ) , based on the presence of comorbidities and the possibly increased risks .
We conducted a systematic review ( MEDLINE , EMBASE and CENTRAL ) to summarize evidence on the potential influence of diabetes mellitus ( DM ) on the response to SET .
Walking training for intermittent claudication in diabetes.
OBJECTIVE Walking training ( WT ) is an established treatment for patients with intermittent claudication ( IC ) . Abnormalities specific to diabetes , such as a relative preponderance of distal lesions and the contribution of microcirculatory disease , might well influence the results of WT . We compared changes in walking distance during WT in diabetic patients with those in nondiabetic control subjects . RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS In consecutive patients with limiting IC and proven peripheral vascular disease , 33 patients with diabetes were compared with 136 control subjects during a  half-year supervised WT program .  Walking parameters were determined every 2 months , while vascular parameters were obtained at the start and end of the program . RESULTS Of the 33 diabetic patients , 25 ( 76 % ) completed the program , as did 87 of the 136 ( 64 % ) control subjects . Thereafter , the symptom-free walking distance and the maximum walking distance ( MWD ) were significantly increased in diabetic patients from 142 + /- 30 to 339 + /- 57 m and from 266 + /- 39 to 603 + /- 52 m , respectively , and in control subjects from 126 + /- 8 to 400 + /- 39 m and from 292 + /- 18 to 628 + /- 36 m , respectively . The relative gain in MWD was 88 % greater in those with diabetes . The vascular parameters were comparable for both groups before and after WT . CONCLUSIONS WT is an effective treatment for IC , with a greater relative gain in diabetic patients
On the contrary , the largest study of this review did not demonstrate any adverse effect of  DM on MWD and FWD after SET .
In conclusion , the data evaluating the effects of DM on SET were inadequate to determine if DM impairs the exercise response .
Some believe that certain patients with intermittent claudication may be unsuitable for supervised exercise therapy ( SET ) , based on the presence of comorbidities and the possibly increased risks .
We conducted a systematic review ( MEDLINE , EMBASE and CENTRAL ) to summarize evidence on the potential influence of diabetes mellitus ( DM ) on the response to SET .