The efficacy and tolerability of tolterodine ER Vs .
A recent meta- analysis evaluating tolterodine in comparison with other antimuscarinic drugs demonstrated that tolterodine ER was significantly more effective than placebo in reducing micturition/24 h , urinary leakage episodes/24 h , urgency episodes/24 h , and urgency incontinence episodes/24 h. With regard to adverse events , tolterodine ER was associated with a good adverse event profile result ing in the third most favorable antimuscarinic .
Conclusion Tolterodine ER result ed effective in reducing frequency urgency and nocturia and urinary leakage in male patients with OAB/storage LUTS .
Dry mouth and constipation are the most frequently reported adverse events
Background Overactive bladder (OAB)/ storage lower urinary tract symptoms ( LUTS ) have a high prevalence affecting up to 90 % of men over 80 years .
The role of sufficient therapies appears crucial .
In the present review , we analyzed the mechanism of action of tolterodine extended-release ( ER ) with the aim to clarify its efficacy and safety profile , as compared to other active treatments of OAB/storage LUTS .
Antimuscarinic drugs are the mainstay of pharmacological therapy for OAB / storage LUTS ; several studies have demonstrated that tolterodine ER is an effective and well tolerated formulation of this class of treatment .
Tolterodine once-daily: superior efficacy and tolerability in the treatment of the overactive bladder.
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a new extended-release ( ER ) , once-daily , capsule formulation of tolterodine , relative to placebo and the existing immediate-release ( IR ) , twice-daily , tablet formulation , for treatment of the overactive bladder . METHODS This was a double-blind , multicenter , r and omized , placebo-controlled trial . One thous and five hundred twenty-nine patients ( 81 % women ) with urinary frequency ( eight or more micturitions every 24 hours ) and urge incontinence ( five or more episodes per week ) were r and omized to oral therapy with tolterodine ER 4 mg once daily ( n = 507 ) , tolterodine IR 2 mg twice daily ( n = 514 ) , or placebo ( n = 508 ) for 12 weeks . Efficacy was assessed at the end of the treatment period on the basis of the micturition diary variables . Tolerability and safety were assessed by evaluating the adverse events , electrocardiogram parameters , laboratory values , and treatment withdrawals . RESULTS Tolterodine ER 4 mg once daily ( P = 0.0001 ) and tolterodine IR 2 mg twice daily ( P = 0.0005 ) both significantly reduced the mean number of urge incontinence episodes per week compared with placebo . The median reduction in these episodes as a percentage of the baseline values was 71 % for tolterodine ER , 60 % for tolterodine IR , and 33 % for placebo . The ER formulation was 18 % more effective than the IR formulation ( P < 0.05 ) . Treatment with both formulations of tolterodine was also associated with statistically significant improvements in all other micturition diary variables compared with placebo . For both formulations , the mean decreases in micturition frequency ( P < 0.0079 ) and pad usage ( P < 0.0145 ) were significant , and the mean volume voided per micturition increased ( P = 0.0001 ) . The rate of dry mouth ( of any severity ) was 23 % for tolterodine ER , 30 % for tolterodine IR , and 8 % for placebo . The overall dry mouth rate for patients taking tolterodine ER was 23 % lower than for tolterodine IR ( P < 0.02 ) , and the rate of severe dry mouth in the ER group was only 1.8 % . The rates of withdrawal were comparable for the two active groups and the placebo group . No safety concerns were noted . CONCLUSIONS Tolterodine ER 4 mg once daily is effective and well tolerated in the treatment of overactive bladder with no safety concerns . Tolterodine ER demonstrated an improved efficacy for reducing urge incontinence episodes and a lower frequency of dry mouth compared with the existing IR twice-daily formulation
The efficacy and tolerability of tolterodine ER Vs .
A recent meta- analysis evaluating tolterodine in comparison with other antimuscarinic drugs demonstrated that tolterodine ER was significantly more effective than placebo in reducing micturition/24 h , urinary leakage episodes/24 h , urgency episodes/24 h , and urgency incontinence episodes/24 h. With regard to adverse events , tolterodine ER was associated with a good adverse event profile result ing in the third most favorable antimuscarinic .
Conclusion Tolterodine ER result ed effective in reducing frequency urgency and nocturia and urinary leakage in male patients with OAB/storage LUTS .
Dry mouth and constipation are the most frequently reported adverse events
Background Overactive bladder (OAB)/ storage lower urinary tract symptoms ( LUTS ) have a high prevalence affecting up to 90 % of men over 80 years .
The role of sufficient therapies appears crucial .
In the present review , we analyzed the mechanism of action of tolterodine extended-release ( ER ) with the aim to clarify its efficacy and safety profile , as compared to other active treatments of OAB/storage LUTS .
Antimuscarinic drugs are the mainstay of pharmacological therapy for OAB / storage LUTS ; several studies have demonstrated that tolterodine ER is an effective and well tolerated formulation of this class of treatment .