Current data confirm that the 6MWT , ISWT and ESWT are valid , reliable and responsive to change with some interventions .
However , results are sensitive to small changes in methodology .
Field walking tests are commonly employed to evaluate exercise capacity , assess prognosis and evaluate treatment response in chronic respiratory diseases .
In recent years , there has been a wealth of new literature pertinent to the conduct of the 6-min walk test ( 6MWT ) , and a growing evidence base describing the incremental and endurance shuttle walk tests ( ISWT and ESWT , respectively ) .
The aim of this document is to describe the st and ard operating procedures for the 6MWT , ISWT and ESWT , which can be consistently employed by clinicians and research ers .
Ground walk training improves functional exercise capacity more than cycle training in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): a randomised trial.
QUESTIONS Does an eight-week program of walk training improve endurance walking capacity in people with COPD compared to cycle training ? Does walk training improve peak walking capacity , cycle capacity , and quality of life compared to cycle training ? Is the endurance shuttle walk test ( ESWT ) responsive to change in walking capacity elicited by exercise training ? DESIGN R and omised trial with concealed allocation , assessor blinding , and intention-to-treat analysis . PARTICIPANTS 36 people with stable COPD recruited with four dropouts . INTERVENTION Participants were r and omised into either a walk or cycle training group . Both groups trained indoors for 30 to 45 minutes per session , three times weekly over eight weeks at Concord Hospital . Training intensities were based on baseline peak exercise tests and progressed as able . OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was endurance walking capacity measured by the ESWT . Secondary outcomes included peak walking capacity , peak and endurance cycle capacity , and health-related quality of life . Measures were taken at baseline ( Week 0 ) and following training ( Week 8) . RESULTS The walk training group increased their endurance walking time by 279 seconds ( 95 % CI 70 to 483 ) more than the cycle training group . No significant differences between the groups were found for any other outcome . CONCLUSION Ground walk training increased endurance walking capacity more than cycle training and was similar to cycle training in improving peak walking capacity , peak and endurance cycle capacity and quality of life . This study provides evidence for ground walking as a mode of exercise training in pulmonary rehabilitation programs
Current data confirm that the 6MWT , ISWT and ESWT are valid , reliable and responsive to change with some interventions .
However , results are sensitive to small changes in methodology .
Field walking tests are commonly employed to evaluate exercise capacity , assess prognosis and evaluate treatment response in chronic respiratory diseases .
In recent years , there has been a wealth of new literature pertinent to the conduct of the 6-min walk test ( 6MWT ) , and a growing evidence base describing the incremental and endurance shuttle walk tests ( ISWT and ESWT , respectively ) .
The aim of this document is to describe the st and ard operating procedures for the 6MWT , ISWT and ESWT , which can be consistently employed by clinicians and research ers .