Conclusions Compared with RF ablation , cryoablation present a comparable long-term AF/atrial tachycardial-free survival and procedure-related adverse events .
Meanwhile , cryoablation markedly shorten the procedure time , nonetheless , with negligible impact on the fluoroscopy time
Aims Cryoablation is a promising alternative technique to RF ablation for treating paroxysmal AF with encouraging results .
However , data about the efficacy and safety comparison between cryoablation and RF ablation is still lacking .
Cryoballoon Versus Open Irrigated Radiofrequency Ablation in Patients With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Background — There is a lack of data on the comparative efficacy and procedural safety of open irrigated radiofrequency ( RF ) and cryoballoon catheter ( CB ) ablation for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation . Methods and Results — In a prospect i ve , noninferiority study , 315 patients were r and omly assigned to RF ( n=159 ) or CB ( n=156 ) ablation . The primary end point was freedom from atrial arrhythmia with absence of persistent complications . Patients were largely comparable between groups with more vascular disease in the RF group ( 8.2 % versus 2.6 % for CB ; P=0.028 ) . The primary end point at 12 months was achieved by 70.7 % with RF and 73.6 % with CB ( multiple procedure success ) , including 31 redo procedures in each group ( 19.5 % of RF versus 19.9 % of CB ; P=0.933 ) . For the intention-to-treat population , noninferiority of CB was revealed for the predefined inferiority margin ( risk difference , 0.029 ; 95 % confidence interval , −0.074 to 0.132 ; P<0.001 ) . Rates at 6 months were 63.1 % and 64.1 % for the RF and CB groups ( single procedure success ) , and noninferiority was confirmed ( risk difference , 0.010 ; 95 % confidence interval , −0.097 to 0.116 ; P=0.002 ) . Periprocedural complications for the index procedure were more frequent in the CB group ( 5.0 % RF , 12.2 % CB ; P=0.022 ) with a significant difference in phrenic nerve palsies ( 0 % RF , 5.8 % CB ; P=0.002 ) . Conclusion — This large , prospect i ve , r and omized , controlled study demonstrates noninferiority of CB ablation versus RF ablation for treating patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation . Clinical Trial Registration — URL : http://www . clinical trials.gov . Unique identifier : NCT00774566
Conclusions Compared with RF ablation , cryoablation present a comparable long-term AF/atrial tachycardial-free survival and procedure-related adverse events .
Meanwhile , cryoablation markedly shorten the procedure time , nonetheless , with negligible impact on the fluoroscopy time
Aims Cryoablation is a promising alternative technique to RF ablation for treating paroxysmal AF with encouraging results .
However , data about the efficacy and safety comparison between cryoablation and RF ablation is still lacking .