Conclusion The results of this meta- analysis suggest that robotic-assisted THA has certain advantages over conventional THA , including the results of component positioning and rates of intraoperative complications .
Background Robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty ( THA ) allows for accurate preoperative planning and component positioning , potentially enhancing implant survival and long-term outcomes .
The relative efficacy and safety of robotic-assisted and conventional THA , however , are unclear .
This systematic review and meta- analysis compared the safety and efficacy of robotic-assisted and conventional THA .
A Comparison between Robotic-assisted and Manual Implantation of Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty
Background The benefits of robotic techniques for implanting femoral components during THA are still controversial . Questions / Purpose sThe purpose of this study was to prospect ively compare the results and complications of robotic-assisted and h and -rasping stem implantation techniques . Method The minimum followup was 5 years ( mean , 67 months ; range , 60–85 months ) . One hundred forty-six primary THAs on 130 patients were included in this study .  Robot-assisted primary THA was performed on 75 hips and a h and -rasping technique was used on 71 hips . Results At 2 and 3 years postoperatively , the Japanese Orthopaedic Association ( JOA ) clinical score was slightly better in the robotic-assisted group . At 5 years followup , however , the differences were not significant . Postoperative limb lengths of the robotic-milling group had significantly less variance than the h and -rasping group . At 2 years postoperatively , there was significantly more stress shielding of the proximal femur in the h and -rasping group ; this difference was more significant 5 years postoperatively . Conclusions Substantially more precise implant positioning seems to have led to less variance in limb-length ine quality and less stress shielding of the proximal femur 5 years postoperatively . Level of Evidence Level II , therapeutic study . See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence
Conclusion The results of this meta- analysis suggest that robotic-assisted THA has certain advantages over conventional THA , including the results of component positioning and rates of intraoperative complications .
Background Robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty ( THA ) allows for accurate preoperative planning and component positioning , potentially enhancing implant survival and long-term outcomes .
The relative efficacy and safety of robotic-assisted and conventional THA , however , are unclear .
This systematic review and meta- analysis compared the safety and efficacy of robotic-assisted and conventional THA .