There was low- to very low- quality evidence that other interventions were not effective in reducing work-related upper limb and neck MSDs in adults .
We found moderate- quality evidence to suggest that the use of arm support with alternative mouse may reduce the incidence of neck/shoulder MSDs , but not right upper limb MSDs .
Moreover , we found moderate- quality evidence to suggest that the incidence of neck/shoulder and right upper limb MSDs is not reduced when comparing alternative and conventional mouse with and without arm support .
However , given there were multiple comparisons made involving a number of interventions and outcomes , high- quality evidence is needed to determine the effectiveness of these interventions clearly .
While we found very-low- to low- quality evidence to suggest that other ergonomic interventions do not prevent work-related MSDs of the upper limb and neck , this was limited by the paucity and heterogeneity of available studies .
BACKGROUND Work-related upper limb and neck musculoskeletal disorders ( MSDs ) are one of the most common occupational disorders around the world .
Although ergonomic design and training are likely to reduce the risk of workers developing work-related upper limb and neck MSDs , the evidence is unclear .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of workplace ergonomic design or training interventions , or both , for the prevention of work-related upper limb and neck MSDs in adults .
A randomised controlled trial evaluating an alternative mouse and forearm support on upper body discomfort and musculoskeletal disorders among engineers
Objectives : The aim of this intervention study was to determine the effects of an alternative mouse and /or a forearm support board on the change in upper body discomfort scores and the development of incident musculoskeletal disorders . Methods : This r and omised controlled intervention trial followed 206 engineers for one year . Participants were r and omised to receive ( 1 ) a conventional mouse only , ( 2 ) an alternative mouse only , ( 3 ) a forearm support board , or ( 4 ) an alternative mouse plus forearm support board . Outcome measures included weekly upper body discomfort scores and incident musculoskeletal disorders . Results : During the study , 42 participants were diagnosed with an incident musculoskeletal disorder . The group that received the forearm support board experienced a reduction in their right upper extremity discomfort ( beta-coefficient −0.35 , 95 % CI −0.67 to −0.03 ) in comparison to those who did not receive a forearm board . The group that received the alternative mouse had a protective , but non-significant ( p = 0.20 ) , effect on incident cases of right upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders ( HR 0.57 , 95 % CI 0.24 to 1.34 ) and a non-significant reduction in neck/shoulder discomfort ( beta-coefficient −0.23 , 95 % CI −0.056 to 0.10 ) in comparison to those who received a conventional mouse . Conclusions : In engineers who use a computer for more than 20 h per week , a forearm support board may reduce right upper extremity discomfort attributed to computer use
There was low- to very low- quality evidence that other interventions were not effective in reducing work-related upper limb and neck MSDs in adults .
We found moderate- quality evidence to suggest that the use of arm support with alternative mouse may reduce the incidence of neck/shoulder MSDs , but not right upper limb MSDs .
Moreover , we found moderate- quality evidence to suggest that the incidence of neck/shoulder and right upper limb MSDs is not reduced when comparing alternative and conventional mouse with and without arm support .
However , given there were multiple comparisons made involving a number of interventions and outcomes , high- quality evidence is needed to determine the effectiveness of these interventions clearly .
While we found very-low- to low- quality evidence to suggest that other ergonomic interventions do not prevent work-related MSDs of the upper limb and neck , this was limited by the paucity and heterogeneity of available studies .
BACKGROUND Work-related upper limb and neck musculoskeletal disorders ( MSDs ) are one of the most common occupational disorders around the world .
Although ergonomic design and training are likely to reduce the risk of workers developing work-related upper limb and neck MSDs , the evidence is unclear .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of workplace ergonomic design or training interventions , or both , for the prevention of work-related upper limb and neck MSDs in adults .