Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
Survivors of uterine cancer empowered by exercise and healthy diet (SUCCEED): a randomized controlled trial.
OBJECTIVE The majority of endometrial cancer survivors ( ECS ) are obese and at risk for premature death . The purpose of this study was to evaluate an intervention for ECS to promote weight loss and a healthy lifestyle . METHODS Early stage overweight and obese ( body mass index ≥ 25 ) ECS ( N=75 ) were r and omized to a  6-month lifestyle intervention ( LI ) or usual care ( UC ) . The LI group received education and counseling for six months ( 10 weekly followed by 6 bi-weekly sessions ) . Weight change at 12 months was the primary endpoint . Secondary outcomes included fruit/vegetable servings/day and physical activity ( PA ) . Multiple imputations were used for missing data and mixed models were used to analyze changes from baseline . RESULTS Adherence was 84 % and follow-up data were available from 92 % of participants at 6 months and 79 % at 12 months . Mean [ 95 % CI ] difference in weight change between LI and UC groups at 6 months was -4.4 kg [ -5.3 , -3.5 ] , p<0.001 and at 12 months was -4.6 kg [ -5.8 , -3.5 ] , p<0.001 . Mean [ 95 % CI ] difference in PA minutes between groups at 6 months was 100 [ 6 , 194 ] , p=0.038 and at 12 months was 89 [ 14 , 163 ] , p=0.020 . Mean difference in kilocalories consumed was -217.8 ( p<0.001 ) at 6 months and -187.2 ( p<0.001 ) at 12 months . Mean [ 95 % CI ] difference in fruit and vegetable servings was 0.91 servings/day at 6 months and 0.92 at 12 months ( p<0.001 ) . CONCLUSIONS Behavior change and weight loss are achievable in overweight and obese ECS , however , the clinical implication s of these changes are unknown and require a larger trial with longer follow-up
Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?