Conclusion In patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation  , cryoballoon and radiofrequency ablation produce similar results in terms of freedom from recurrent atrial fibrillation or atrial tachyarrhythmias but with a different safety profile , being cryoballoon ablation less associated with cardiac complications but more likely to cause phrenic nerve palsy
Aims To perform an up date d meta- analysis to assess efficacy , safety and technical performance of pulmonary vein isolation using cryoballoon or radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation .
Outcomes after cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation: a multicentric propensity-score matched study
Purpose Recent data show no benefit of additional ablation beyond pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) in persistent atrial fibrillation ( AF ) . Evidence suggests that radiofrequency energy ( RF ) and cryoballoon ( CRYO ) have comparable efficacy for PVI . We aim ed to assess the outcomes after a single catheter ablation procedure , comparing PVI using CRYO vs. RF ablation for PVI plus additional ablation in a cohort of patients with persistent AF . Methods In this prospect i ve multicenter propensity score-matched comparison , 59 consecutive patients undergoing CRYO ablation of persistent AF were matched to 59 patients treated with RF from November 2010 to June 2012 . Results During a mean follow-up of 15.6 ± 11.5 months , 43.2 % of patients presented atrial arrhythmia relapse after a blanking period of 3 months , which was comparable between the two groups ( 40.7 % in CRYO vs. 45.8 % in RF , Log rank P = 0.14 ; HR = 0.67 , 95 % CI 0.38–1.16 , P = 0.15 ) , despite the fact that 52.5 % of RF patients add additional complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation , as well as left atrial linear ablation in over two-thirds ( roof line in 67.8 % and mitral isthmus in 32.2 % ) . On multivariate Cox regression , only AF duration in years ( HR = 1.10 , 95 % CI 1.01–1.10 , P = 0.04 ) was a predictor of relapse . Patients undergoing RF ablation presented a numerically , but non-significantly , lower complication rate ( 6.8 vs 10.2 % , P = 0.51 ) . Conclusion In our multicenter experience , freedom from atrial arrhythmias was comparable among matched patients treated with CRYO and RF , despite non-significant trends in favor of RF in terms of complications , at the cost of longer procedure times
Conclusion In patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation  , cryoballoon and radiofrequency ablation produce similar results in terms of freedom from recurrent atrial fibrillation or atrial tachyarrhythmias but with a different safety profile , being cryoballoon ablation less associated with cardiac complications but more likely to cause phrenic nerve palsy
Aims To perform an up date d meta- analysis to assess efficacy , safety and technical performance of pulmonary vein isolation using cryoballoon or radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation .