Results indicated that some PFTs may have some prognostic utility , i.e. a trend for more clinical events to be associated with groups classified as ' aspirin resistant ' .
Study -level effect sizes were generally small and absolute outcome risk was not substantially different between ' aspirin resistant ' and ' aspirin sensitive ' design ations .
Based on assumptions of PFTs being able to accurately identify patients at high risk of clinical events and such patients benefiting from treatment modification , the economic model found that a test-treat strategy was likely to be cost-effective .
However , neither assumption is currently evidence based .
BACKGROUND The use of aspirin is well established for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease .
However , a proportion of patients suffer repeat cardiovascular events despite being prescribed aspirin treatment .
It is uncertain whether or not this is due to an inherent inability of aspirin to sufficiently modify platelet activity .
This report aims to investigate whether or not insufficient platelet function inhibition by aspirin ( ' aspirin resistance ' ) , as defined using platelet function tests ( PFTs ) , is linked to the occurrence of adverse clinical outcomes , and further , whether or not patients at risk of future adverse clinical events can be identified through PFTs .
OBJECTIVES To review systematic ally the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness evidence regarding the association between PFT design ation of ' aspirin resistance ' and the risk of adverse clinical outcome ( s ) in patients prescribed aspirin therapy .
To undertake exploratory model-based cost-effectiveness analysis on the use of PFTs .
Relation of aspirin resistance to coronary flow reserve in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention.
Previous studies have shown that more complete platelet inhibition improves the coronary flow reserve ( CFR ) , a measure of microvascular integrity , in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention ( PCI ) . We hypothesized that patients with aspirin resistance would have impaired CFR after elective PCI . We used VerifyNow Aspirin to determine the response to aspirin in 117 consecutive patients who underwent elective single-lesion PCI . The assay results are expressed quantitatively in Aspirin Reaction Units based on the degree of platelet aggregation . All patients received a 300-mg loading dose of clopidogrel > 12 hours before and a 75-mg maintenance dose the morning of PCI . CFR was estimated using the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infa rct ion frame count method . Of the 117 patients , 22 ( 18.8 % ) were aspirin resistant . The clinical , angiographic , and procedural characteristics of the aspirin-sensitive and -resistant patients were balanced . All patients underwent successful PCI with < 50 % residual diameter stenosis and Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infa rct ion grade 3 flow after PCI . Aspirin-resistant patients had a lower CFR than the aspirin-sensitive patients ( 1.42 + /- 0.35 vs 1.80 + /- 0.64 , p = 0.018 ) . Univariate correlates of CFR included the Aspirin Reaction Unit ( r = -0.227 , p = 0.014 ) and post-PCI creatine kinase-MB elevation ( p = 0.048 ) . Multivariate linear regression analysis revealed the Aspirin Reaction Unit to be the only independent determinant of CFR after PCI ( r2 = 0.051 , p = 0.014 ) . Thus , aspirin resistance was associated with impaired CFR in patients who underwent elective PCI , implicating insufficient aspirin-induced platelet inhibition as a cause of microvascular dysfunction by distal atherothrombotic embolization and /or spasm
Results indicated that some PFTs may have some prognostic utility , i.e. a trend for more clinical events to be associated with groups classified as ' aspirin resistant ' .
Study -level effect sizes were generally small and absolute outcome risk was not substantially different between ' aspirin resistant ' and ' aspirin sensitive ' design ations .
Based on assumptions of PFTs being able to accurately identify patients at high risk of clinical events and such patients benefiting from treatment modification , the economic model found that a test-treat strategy was likely to be cost-effective .
However , neither assumption is currently evidence based .
BACKGROUND The use of aspirin is well established for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease .
However , a proportion of patients suffer repeat cardiovascular events despite being prescribed aspirin treatment .
It is uncertain whether or not this is due to an inherent inability of aspirin to sufficiently modify platelet activity .
This report aims to investigate whether or not insufficient platelet function inhibition by aspirin ( ' aspirin resistance ' ) , as defined using platelet function tests ( PFTs ) , is linked to the occurrence of adverse clinical outcomes , and further , whether or not patients at risk of future adverse clinical events can be identified through PFTs .
OBJECTIVES To review systematic ally the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness evidence regarding the association between PFT design ation of ' aspirin resistance ' and the risk of adverse clinical outcome ( s ) in patients prescribed aspirin therapy .
To undertake exploratory model-based cost-effectiveness analysis on the use of PFTs .