There is low to high ( majority moderate ) certainty for small improvements of unclear clinical importance in plasma glucose , triglycerides , and HDL concentrations favoring low-carbohydrate food at half of the prespecified time points .
There was little to no difference in LDL concentration or any of the secondary outcomes ( body weight , waist circumference , blood pressure , quality of life ) in response to either of the diets ( very-low- to high-certainty evidence ) .
Conclusions Currently available data provide low- to moderate-certainty evidence that dietary carbohydrate restriction to a maximum of 40 % yields slightly better metabolic control of uncertain clinical importance than reduction in fat to a maximum of 30 % in people with T2D .
Background It remains uncertain which diet is best for people with type 2 diabetes ( T2D ) .
Objective We compared the effects of dietary carbohydrate restriction with fat restriction on markers of metabolic syndrome and quality of life in people with T2D .
Long-term effects of popular dietary approaches on weight loss and features of insulin resistance
Objective : High-carbohydrate (HC)–high-fibre diets are recommended for weight loss and for treating and preventing diseases such as diabetes and cardiovascular disease . We report a r and omised trial comparing high-fat ( HF ) and high-protein ( HP ) diets with the conventional approach . Research design and methods : A total of 93 overweight insulin-resistant women received advice following r and omisation to HF , HP or HC dietary regimes , to achieve weight loss followed by weight maintenance over 12 months . Weight , body composition and measures of carbohydrate and lipid metabolism were investigated . Results : Retention rates were 93 % for HP and 75 % for HC and HF .  Features of the metabolic syndrome improved in all groups during the first 6 months , to a greater extent on HF and HP than an HC . During the second 6 months the HF group had increases in waist circumference ( mean difference 4.4 cm ( 95 % CI 3.0 , 5.8 ) ) , fat mass ( 2.3 kg ( 1.5 , 3.1 ) ) , triglycerides ( 0.28 mmol/l ( 0.09 , 0.46 ) ) and 2 h glucose ( 0.70 mmol/l ( 0.22 , 1.18 ) ) . Overall there was substantial sustained improvement in waist circumference , triglycerides and insulin in the HP group and sustained but more modest changes on HC .  Dietary compliance at 12 months was poor in all groups . Conclusions : HP and HC approaches appear to be appropriate options for insulin-resistant individuals . When recommending HP diets appropriate composition of dietary fat must be ensured . HC diet recommendations must include advice regarding appropriate high-fibre , low glycaemic index foods
There is low to high ( majority moderate ) certainty for small improvements of unclear clinical importance in plasma glucose , triglycerides , and HDL concentrations favoring low-carbohydrate food at half of the prespecified time points .
There was little to no difference in LDL concentration or any of the secondary outcomes ( body weight , waist circumference , blood pressure , quality of life ) in response to either of the diets ( very-low- to high-certainty evidence ) .
Conclusions Currently available data provide low- to moderate-certainty evidence that dietary carbohydrate restriction to a maximum of 40 % yields slightly better metabolic control of uncertain clinical importance than reduction in fat to a maximum of 30 % in people with T2D .
Background It remains uncertain which diet is best for people with type 2 diabetes ( T2D ) .
Objective We compared the effects of dietary carbohydrate restriction with fat restriction on markers of metabolic syndrome and quality of life in people with T2D .