Surgery results in greater improvement in weight loss outcomes and weight associated comorbidities compared with non-surgical interventions , regardless of the type of procedures used .
When compared with each other , certain procedures result ed in greater weight loss and improvements in comorbidities than others .
Outcomes were similar between RYGB and sleeve gastrectomy , and both of these procedures had better outcomes than adjustable gastric b and ing .
For people with very high BMI , biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch result ed in greater weight loss than RYGB .
Isolated sleeve gastrectomy led to better weight-loss outcomes than adjustable gastric b and ing after three years follow-up .
BACKGROUND Bariatric ( weight loss ) surgery for obesity is considered when other treatments have failed .
The effects of the available bariatric procedures compared with medical management and with each other are uncertain .
This is an up date of a Cochrane review first published in 2003 and most recently up date d in 2009 .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of bariatric surgery for overweight and obesity , including the control of comorbidities .
Adjustable gastric banding and conventional therapy for type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial.
CONTEXT Observational studies suggest that surgically induced loss of weight may be effective therapy for type 2 diabetes . OBJECTIVE To determine if surgically induced weight loss results in better glycemic control and less need for diabetes medications than conventional approaches to weight loss and diabetes control . DESIGN , SETTING , AND PARTICIPANTS Unblinded r and omized controlled trial conducted from December 2002 through December 2006 at the University Obesity Research Center in Australia , with general community recruitment to established treatment programs . Participants were 60 obese patients ( BMI > 30 and < 40 ) with recently diagnosed ( < 2 years ) type 2 diabetes . INTERVENTIONS Conventional diabetes therapy with a focus on weight loss by lifestyle change vs laparoscopic adjustable gastric b and ing with conventional diabetes care . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Remission of type 2 diabetes ( fasting glucose level < 126 mg/dL [ 7.0 mmol/L ] and glycated hemoglobin [ HbA1c ] value < 6.2 % while taking no glycemic therapy ) . Secondary measures included weight and components of the metabolic syndrome . Analysis was by intention-to-treat . RESULTS Of the 60 patients enrolled , 55 ( 92 % ) completed the 2-year follow-up . Remission of type 2 diabetes was achieved by 22 ( 73 % ) in the surgical group and 4 ( 13 % ) in the conventional-therapy group . Relative risk of remission for the surgical group was 5.5 ( 95 % confidence interval , 2.2 - 14.0 ) . Surgical and conventional-therapy groups lost a mean ( SD ) of 20.7 % ( 8.6 % ) and 1.7 % ( 5.2 % ) of weight , respectively , at 2 years ( P < .001 ) . Remission of type 2 diabetes was related to weight loss ( R2 = 0.46 , P < .001 ) and lower baseline HbA1c levels ( combined R2 = 0.52 , P < .001 ) . There were no serious complications in either group . CONCLUSIONS Participants r and omized to surgical therapy were more likely to achieve remission of type 2 diabetes through greater weight loss . These results need to be confirmed in a larger , more diverse population and have long-term efficacy assessed . TRIAL REGISTRATION actr.org Identifier : ACTRN012605000159651
Surgery results in greater improvement in weight loss outcomes and weight associated comorbidities compared with non-surgical interventions , regardless of the type of procedures used .
When compared with each other , certain procedures result ed in greater weight loss and improvements in comorbidities than others .
Outcomes were similar between RYGB and sleeve gastrectomy , and both of these procedures had better outcomes than adjustable gastric b and ing .
For people with very high BMI , biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch result ed in greater weight loss than RYGB .
Isolated sleeve gastrectomy led to better weight-loss outcomes than adjustable gastric b and ing after three years follow-up .
BACKGROUND Bariatric ( weight loss ) surgery for obesity is considered when other treatments have failed .
The effects of the available bariatric procedures compared with medical management and with each other are uncertain .
This is an up date of a Cochrane review first published in 2003 and most recently up date d in 2009 .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of bariatric surgery for overweight and obesity , including the control of comorbidities .