Our primary finding is that PVI performed with a wide antral approach is more effective than ostial PVI in achieving freedom from total atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence at long-term follow-up
BACKGROUND For the past decade , electric pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) has become a procedure implemented worldwide for the treatment of atrial fibrillation .
Currently , 2 main approaches are used for PVI : ostial isolation of the PVs and wide antral PVI .
The aims of this systematic review are to evaluate the relative merits of each technique with a pooled comparative analysis of efficacy and complications .
Recurrence of pulmonary vein conduction and atrial fibrillation after pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation: a randomized trial of the ostial versus the extraostial ablation strategy.
BACKGROUND Both segmental ostial and circumferential extraostial pulmonary vein ( PV ) isolation have been proven effective in the treatment of atrial fibrillation ( AF ) . However , the recurrence of AF and PV conduction after the 2 ablation strategies has never been compared in a r and omized study . METHODS A total of 100 consecutive patients ( age 56 + /- 10 ; 71 men ) with symptomatic AF ( paroxysmal , 51 ; persistent , 49 ) were r and omized to segmental ostial ( n = 54 ) or circumferential extraostial ( n = 46 ) PV isolation . A circular catheter positioned at the ostium of each target PV guided the ostial PV isolation . Extraostial PV isolation was performed by encircling the paired left and right PVs , respectively , guided by an electroanatomic mapping system . RESULTS A total of 84 % of the patients had recurrent AF after the first PV isolation procedure , showing 72 % with AF and 12 % with organized left atrial tachycardia . In patients undergoing reablation , all but 2 patients had recurrence of left atrium PV conduction ( > 95 % ) . During a mean follow-up of 12 months without antiarrhythmic medication , 57 % of patients who underwent extraostial PV isolation were free of arrhythmia symptoms compared with 31 % of patients who underwent ostial PV isolation ( P < .05 ) . This difference in success rate between the 2 ablation strategies was mainly seen in patients known with persistent AF ( 52 % and 15 % , respectively ; P = .02 ) as opposed to patients with paroxysmal AF ( 65 % and 46 % , respectively ; P = .26 ) . CONCLUSIONS Overall , the more proximal , extraostial PV isolation was found to be superior to ostial PV isolation , especially in patients known with persistent AF . A high recurrence rate of 84 % after a single complete PV isolation procedure was seen . At reablation , more than 95 % had recurrence of left atrium PV conduction regardless of the procedure used , supporting the idea that complete PV isolation seems essential to prevent arrhythmia recurrences
Our primary finding is that PVI performed with a wide antral approach is more effective than ostial PVI in achieving freedom from total atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence at long-term follow-up
BACKGROUND For the past decade , electric pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) has become a procedure implemented worldwide for the treatment of atrial fibrillation .
Currently , 2 main approaches are used for PVI : ostial isolation of the PVs and wide antral PVI .
The aims of this systematic review are to evaluate the relative merits of each technique with a pooled comparative analysis of efficacy and complications .