REVIEW ER 'S CONCLUSIONS There is no evidence to support feeding with a hydrolysed formula for the prevention of allergy in preference to exclusive breast feeding .
In high risk infants who are unable to be completely breast fed , there is evidence that prolonged feeding with a hydrolysed compared to a cow 's milk formula reduces infant and childhood allergy and infant CMA .
BACKGROUND Allergies and food reactions are common and may be associated with foods including adapted cow 's milk formulas .
Formulas containing hydrolysed proteins have been used to treat infants with allergy or food intolerance , and have been advocated for prevention of allergy and food intolerance in infants .
OBJECTIVES To determine whether use of hydrolysed formulas for infant feeding prevents allergy and food intolerance .
If hydrolysed formulas are effective , to determine what type of hydrolysed formula is most effective including extensively and partially hydrolysed formulas .
To determine which infants benefit including infants at low or high risk of allergy and infants receiving early , short term or prolonged formula feeding .
The nutritional value of a whey hydrolysate formula compared with a whey-predominant formula in healthy infants.
Forty-five healthy infants were included in a double-blind r and omized prospect i ve study comparing the nutritional value of two formulas . One group received a whey-predominant formula ( n = 20 ) ; the other group received a whey hydrolysate formula ( n = 25 ) . Four infants of the whey hydrolysate group were dropped because they refused the formula . Although the mean daily volume intake was smaller with the whey hydrolysate formula compared with the whey-predominant formula ( p < 0.001 ) , the weight gain in the two groups after 13 weeks was identical ( 27.2 g/day in both groups ; the mean difference in weight gain between the groups after 13 weeks was only 8 g ) . Length gain at 13 weeks was 10.4 cm in the whey-predominant formula group and 10.8 cm in the whey hydrolysate formula group ( p = NS ) . After 13 weeks , blood was sample d for hemoglobin , hematocrit , red blood cell count , white blood cell count , lymphocytes , glycemia , proteins , albumin , prealbumin , calcium , phosphorus , urea , creatinine , iron , iron-binding capacity , zinc , and vitamins A and E. Except for the iron-binding capacity , zinc , urea ( in plasma as well as in urine ) ( all three were higher in the whey hydrolysate group ) , no significant differences were found . According to these results , exclusive feeding of the whey hydrolysate formula from birth to 3 months of age to healthy infants appears to result in an adequate nutritional status , as assessed at 3 months of age
REVIEW ER 'S CONCLUSIONS There is no evidence to support feeding with a hydrolysed formula for the prevention of allergy in preference to exclusive breast feeding .
In high risk infants who are unable to be completely breast fed , there is evidence that prolonged feeding with a hydrolysed compared to a cow 's milk formula reduces infant and childhood allergy and infant CMA .
BACKGROUND Allergies and food reactions are common and may be associated with foods including adapted cow 's milk formulas .
Formulas containing hydrolysed proteins have been used to treat infants with allergy or food intolerance , and have been advocated for prevention of allergy and food intolerance in infants .
OBJECTIVES To determine whether use of hydrolysed formulas for infant feeding prevents allergy and food intolerance .
If hydrolysed formulas are effective , to determine what type of hydrolysed formula is most effective including extensively and partially hydrolysed formulas .
To determine which infants benefit including infants at low or high risk of allergy and infants receiving early , short term or prolonged formula feeding .