No significant difference in pulmonary function was observed between the two groups .
However , 6MWD and VO2 peak were significantly improved after exercise training .
Conclusion Preoperative exercise training may reduce PPCs for lung cancer patients .
Rehabilitation exercise strengthens muscle capacity , but does not improve impaired pulmonary function , which emphasizes the possible mechanism of the protocol design
Objectives This meta- analysis aim ed to demonstrate the impact of preoperative exercise therapy on surgical outcomes in patients with lung cancer and COPD .
Pulmonary function and muscle capacity were investigated to explore their potential links with outcome improvements after exercise .
Preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation versus chest physical therapy in patients undergoing lung cancer resection: a pilot randomized controlled trial.
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of 4 weeks of pulmonary rehabilitation ( PR ) versus chest physical therapy ( CPT ) on the preoperative functional capacity and postoperative respiratory morbidity of patients undergoing lung cancer resection . DESIGN R and omized single-blinded study . SETTING A teaching hospital . PARTICIPANTS Patients undergoing lung cancer resection ( N=24 ) . INTERVENTIONS Patients were r and omly assigned to receive PR ( strength and endurance training ) versus CPT ( breathing exercises for lung expansion ) . Both groups received educational classes . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Functional parameters assessed before and after 4 weeks of PR or CPT ( phase 1 ) , and pulmonary complications assessed after lung cancer resection ( phase 2 ) . RESULTS Twelve patients were r and omly assigned to the PR arm and 12 to the CPT arm . Three patients in the CPT arm were not su bmi tted to lung resection because of inoperable cancer . During phase 1 evaluation , most functional parameters in the PR group improved from baseline to 1 month : forced vital capacity ( FVC ) ( 1.47L [ 1.27 - 2.33L ] vs 1.71L [ 1.65 - 2.80L ] , respectively ; P=.02 ) ; percentage of predicted FVC ( FVC% ; 62.5 % [ 49%-71 % ] vs 76 % [ 65%-79.7 % ] , respectively ; P<.05 ) ; 6-minute walk test ( 425.5±85.3 m vs 475±86.5 m , respectively ; P<.05 ) ; maximal inspiratory pressure ( 90±45.9cmH(2)O vs 117.5±36.5cmH(2)O , respectively ; P<.05 ) ; and maximal expiratory pressure ( 79.7±17.1cmH(2)O vs 92.9±21.4cmH(2)O , respectively ; P<.05 ) . During phase 2 evaluation , the PR group had a lower incidence of postoperative respiratory morbidity ( P=.01 ) , a shorter length of postoperative stay ( 12.2±3.6d vs 7.8±4.8d , respectively ; P=.04 ) , and required a chest tube for fewer days ( 7.4±2.6d vs 4.5±2.9d , respectively ; P=.03 ) compared with the CPT arm . CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that 4 weeks of PR before lung cancer resection improves preoperative functional capacity and decreases the postoperative respiratory morbidity
No significant difference in pulmonary function was observed between the two groups .
However , 6MWD and VO2 peak were significantly improved after exercise training .
Conclusion Preoperative exercise training may reduce PPCs for lung cancer patients .
Rehabilitation exercise strengthens muscle capacity , but does not improve impaired pulmonary function , which emphasizes the possible mechanism of the protocol design
Objectives This meta- analysis aim ed to demonstrate the impact of preoperative exercise therapy on surgical outcomes in patients with lung cancer and COPD .
Pulmonary function and muscle capacity were investigated to explore their potential links with outcome improvements after exercise .