Conclusions This meta‐ analysis provides level 1 evidence that vitamin D supplementation may reduce chronic low‐ grade inflammation in patients with type 2 diabetes .
Background Vitamin D has been proposed to have anti‐inflammatory properties ; however , the effect of vitamin D supplementation on inflammation in type 2 diabetes has not been established .
Objective The aim of this systematic review and meta‐ analysis was to examine the effect of vitamin D supplementation on inflammatory markers in patients with type 2 diabetes and to identify relevant gaps in knowledge .
A randomised controlled trial evaluating the impact of targeted vitamin D supplementation on endothelial function in type 2 diabetes mellitus: The DIMENSION trial
We sought to determine if vitamin D supplementation , to target 25(OH)D concentrations of 30–40 ng/mL , improves endothelial function in Singapore ’s multi-ethnic type 2 diabetes mellitus population . We r and omised 64 type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with hypovitaminosis D to cholecalciferol 4000 International Unit/matching placebo [ baseline 25(OH)D < 20 ng/mL ] or cholecalciferol 2000 International Unit/matching placebo [ baseline 25(OH)D : 20–30 ng/mL ] daily for 16 weeks with a down titration at 8 weeks if 25(OH)D > 30 ng/mL. Endothelial function was assessed by peripheral tonometry ( reactive hyperaemia index – endothelial peripheral arterial tonometry ) and vascular biomarkers : E-selectin , von-Willebr and factor and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein . We compared the change from baseline parameters in the two groups using Student ’s t-test or Kruskal – Wallis test . A log-normal multivariate regression analysis was used to adjust for relevant baseline variables . The median reactive hyperaemia index in the vitamin D group increased from 0.65 ( interquartile range : 0.42 ) to 0.73 ( interquartile range : 0.36 ) , whereas it decreased from 0.73 ( interquartile range : 0.65 ) to 0.65 ( interquartile range : 0.38 ) ( p = 0.02 ) in the placebo group . After adjustment for baseline variables , the change was not statistically significant for reactive hyperaemia index ( p = 0.07 ) and for other vascular biomarkers ( p > 0.05 ) . Targeted vitamin D supplementation for 16 weeks result ed in a small but non-significant improvement in endothelial function in a type 2 diabetes mellitus cohort
Conclusions This meta‐ analysis provides level 1 evidence that vitamin D supplementation may reduce chronic low‐ grade inflammation in patients with type 2 diabetes .
Background Vitamin D has been proposed to have anti‐inflammatory properties ; however , the effect of vitamin D supplementation on inflammation in type 2 diabetes has not been established .
Objective The aim of this systematic review and meta‐ analysis was to examine the effect of vitamin D supplementation on inflammatory markers in patients with type 2 diabetes and to identify relevant gaps in knowledge .