Total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol were reduced in all trials but there was evidence of heterogeneity of effects .
There was no evidence of any serious harm caused by statin prescription .
Evidence available to date showed that primary prevention with statins is likely to be cost-effective and may improve patient quality of life .
Recent findings from the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists study using individual patient data meta- analysis indicate that these benefits are similar in people at lower ( < 1 % per year ) risk of a major cardiovascular event .
AUTHORS ' CONCLUSIONS Reductions in all-cause mortality , major vascular events and revascularisations were found with no excess of adverse events among people without evidence of CVD treated with statins
BACKGROUND Reducing high blood cholesterol , a risk factor for cardiovascular disease ( CVD ) events in people with and without a past history of CVD is an important goal of pharmacotherapy .
Statins are the first-choice agents .
Previous review s of the effects of statins have highlighted their benefits in people with CVD .
The case for primary prevention was uncertain when the last version of this review was published ( 2011 ) and in light of new data an up date of this review is required .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects , both harms and benefits , of statins in people with no history of CVD .
Cholesterol Reduction With Atorvastatin Improves Walking Distance in Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease
Background —Cholesterol modification reduces cardiovascular events in patients with atherosclerosis , including those with peripheral arterial disease . The purpose of this study was to determine whether cholesterol lowering with atorvastatin improves walking performance in patients with intermittent claudication . Methods and Results —This r and omized , double-blind , parallel- design study included 354 persons with claudication attributable to peripheral arterial disease . Patients were treated with placebo , atorvastatin ( 10 mg per day ) , or atorvastatin ( 80 mg per day ) for 12 months . The outcome measures included change in treadmill exercise time and patient-reported measures of physical activity and quality of life based on question naires . Maximal walking time after 12 months of treatment with atorvastatin did not change significantly . However , there was improvement in pain-free walking time after 12 months of treatment for the 80-mg ( P = 0.025 ) group compared with placebo . A physical activity question naire demonstrated improvement in ambulatory ability for the 10- and 80-mg groups ( P = 0.011 ) , whereas 2 quality of life instruments , the Walking Impairment Question naire and Short Form 36 Question naire , did not show significant change . Conclusions —Atorvastatin improves pain-free walking distance and community-based physical activity in patients with intermittent claudication . When treated with atorvastatin , patients with peripheral arterial disease may experience improvement in symptoms to complement the anticipated reduction in cardiovascular events reported in other studies of statins
Total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol were reduced in all trials but there was evidence of heterogeneity of effects .
There was no evidence of any serious harm caused by statin prescription .
Evidence available to date showed that primary prevention with statins is likely to be cost-effective and may improve patient quality of life .
Recent findings from the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists study using individual patient data meta- analysis indicate that these benefits are similar in people at lower ( < 1 % per year ) risk of a major cardiovascular event .
AUTHORS ' CONCLUSIONS Reductions in all-cause mortality , major vascular events and revascularisations were found with no excess of adverse events among people without evidence of CVD treated with statins
BACKGROUND Reducing high blood cholesterol , a risk factor for cardiovascular disease ( CVD ) events in people with and without a past history of CVD is an important goal of pharmacotherapy .
Statins are the first-choice agents .
Previous review s of the effects of statins have highlighted their benefits in people with CVD .
The case for primary prevention was uncertain when the last version of this review was published ( 2011 ) and in light of new data an up date of this review is required .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects , both harms and benefits , of statins in people with no history of CVD .