Conclusion Based on the small number of studies with appropriate statistical analysis , we are unable to reach a clear conclusion in the clinical performance of medial stabilized knee replacement construct .
Background Medial stabilized  total knee joint replacement ( TKJR ) construct is design ed to closely replicate the kinematics of the knee .
Little is known regarding comparison of clinical functional outcomes of patients utilising vali date d patient reported outcome measures ( PROM ) after medial stabilized TKJR and other construct design s. Purpose To perform a systematic review of the available literature related to the assessment of clinical functional outcomes following a  TKJR  employing a medial stabilized construct design .
No difference between double-high insert and medial-pivot insert in TKA
Abstract Purpose To compare the clinical midterm results in ADVANCE total knee arthroplasty ( TKA ) with double-high ( DH ) insert , with same type implant with medial-pivot ( MP ) insert . Method Forty ADVANCE TKAs were r and omly divided into two groups , and two different design insert , DH insert , and MP insert were used in each group . At midterm , 4–5 years after surgery , Knee Society Scores ( KSS ) , Knee Society Functional Scores ( KSFS ) , range of motion ( ROM ) , and UCLA activity score were assessed and reported in this study . Results Midterm clinical results , including ROM and KSS , were comparable with both groups . KSFS and UCLA activity score were equally good between the two groups . Conclusion The results in this study revealed equally good clinical results with these types of implants at midterm follow-up , although the significant better ROM has not achieved by using DH insert . We concluded that the selection of inserts only could not achieve the better clinical results , including ROM and activity level in this study .Level of evidence Therapeutic studies —investigating the results of treatment , Level II
Conclusion Based on the small number of studies with appropriate statistical analysis , we are unable to reach a clear conclusion in the clinical performance of medial stabilized knee replacement construct .
Background Medial stabilized  total knee joint replacement ( TKJR ) construct is design ed to closely replicate the kinematics of the knee .
Little is known regarding comparison of clinical functional outcomes of patients utilising vali date d patient reported outcome measures ( PROM ) after medial stabilized TKJR and other construct design s. Purpose To perform a systematic review of the available literature related to the assessment of clinical functional outcomes following a  TKJR  employing a medial stabilized construct design .