Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
Physical activity and survival after colorectal cancer diagnosis.
PURPOSE Physically active individuals have a lower risk of developing colorectal cancer but the influence of exercise on cancer survival is unknown . PATIENTS AND METHODS By a prospect i ve , observational study of 573 women with stage I to III colorectal cancer , we studied colorectal cancer-specific and overall mortality according to predefined physical activity categories before and after diagnosis and by change in activity after diagnosis . To minimize bias by occult recurrences , we excluded women who died within 6 months of their postdiagnosis physical activity assessment . RESULTS Increasing levels of exercise after diagnosis of nonmetastatic colorectal cancer reduced cancer-specific mortality ( P for trend = .008 ) and overall mortality ( P for trend = .003 ) . Compared with women who engaged in less than 3 metabolic equivalent task [ MET ] -hours per week of physical activity , those engaging in at least 18 MET-hours per week had an adjusted hazard ratio for colorectal cancer-specific mortality of 0.39 ( 95 % CI , 0.18 to 0.82 ) and an adjusted hazard ratio for overall mortality of 0.43 ( 95 % CI , 0.25 to 0.74 ) . These results remained unchanged even after excluding women who died within 12 and 24 months of activity assessment . Prediagnosis physical activity was not predictive of mortality . Women who increased their activity ( when comparing prediagnosis to postdiagnosis values ) had a hazard ratio of 0.48 ( 95 % CI , 0.24 to 0.97 ) for colorectal cancer deaths and a hazard ratio of 0.51 ( 95 % CI , 0.30 to 0.85 ) for any-cause death , compared with those with no change in activity . CONCLUSION Recreational physical activity after the diagnosis of stages I to III colorectal cancer may reduce the risk of colorectal cancer-specific and overall mortality
Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?