AFCA efficacy in patients with impaired left ventricular systolic function improves when performed early in the natural history of atrial fibrillation and heart failure .
AFCA provides long-term benefits on left ventricular function , significantly reducing the number of patients with severely impaired systolic function
BACKGROUND Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation ( AFCA ) is an established therapeutic option for rhythm control in symptomatic patients .
Its efficacy and safety among patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction is based on small population s , and data concerning long-term outcome are limited .
We performed this meta- analysis to assess safety and long-term outcome of AFCA in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction , to evaluate predictors of recurrence and impact on left ventricular function .
A randomized trial to assess catheter ablation versus rate control in the management of persistent atrial fibrillation in heart failure.
OBJECTIVES This study sought to compare catheter ablation with rate control for persistent atrial fibrillation ( AF ) in heart failure ( HF ) . BACKGROUND The optimal therapy for AF in HF is unclear . Drug-based rhythm control has not proved clinical ly beneficial . Catheter ablation improves cardiac function in patients with HF , but impact on physiological performance has not been formally evaluated in a r and omized trial . METHODS In a r and omized , open-label , blinded-endpoint clinical trial , adults with symptomatic HF , radionuclide left ventricular ejection fraction ( EF ) ≤35 % , and persistent AF were assigned to undergo catheter ablation or rate control . Primary outcome was 12-month change in peak oxygen consumption . Secondary endpoints were quality of life , B-type natriuretic peptide , 6-min walk distance , and EF . Results were analyzed by intention-to-treat . RESULTS Fifty-two patients ( age 63 ± 9 years , EF 24 ± 8 % ) were r and omized , 26 each to ablation and rate control . At 12 months , 88 % of ablation patients maintained sinus rhythm ( single-procedure success 68 % ) . Under rate control , rate criteria were achieved in 96 % . The primary endpoint , peak oxygen consumption , significantly increased in the ablation arm compared with rate control ( difference + 3.07 ml/kg/min , 95 % confidence interval : 0.56 to 5.59 , p = 0.018 ) . The change was not evident at 3 months ( + 0.79 ml/kg/min , 95 % confidence interval : -1.01 to 2.60 , p = 0.38 ) . Ablation improved Minnesota score ( p = 0.019 ) and B-type natriuretic peptide ( p = 0.045 ) and showed nonsignificant trends toward improved 6-min walk distance ( p = 0.095 ) and EF ( p = 0.055 ) . CONCLUSIONS This first r and omized trial of ablation versus rate control to focus on objective exercise performance in AF and HF shows significant benefit from ablation , a strategy that also improves symptoms and neurohormonal status . The effects develop over 12 months , consistent with progressive amelioration of the HF syndrome . ( A R and omised Trial to Assess Catheter Ablation Versus Rate Control in the Management of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation in Chronic Heart Failure ; NCT00878384 )
AFCA efficacy in patients with impaired left ventricular systolic function improves when performed early in the natural history of atrial fibrillation and heart failure .
AFCA provides long-term benefits on left ventricular function , significantly reducing the number of patients with severely impaired systolic function
BACKGROUND Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation ( AFCA ) is an established therapeutic option for rhythm control in symptomatic patients .
Its efficacy and safety among patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction is based on small population s , and data concerning long-term outcome are limited .
We performed this meta- analysis to assess safety and long-term outcome of AFCA in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction , to evaluate predictors of recurrence and impact on left ventricular function .