Pooled net change in systolic blood pressure ( 16 trials ) was -1.86 ( 95 % CI -3.17 to -0.55 ; p=0.01 ) mm Hg ; diastolic blood pressure ( 15 trials ) , -1.53 ( -2.43 to -0.62 ; p=0.001 ) mm Hg ; body mass index ( 14 trials ) , -0.13 ( -0.26 to -0.01 ; p=0.04 ) kg/m2 ; serum total cholesterol ( 14 trials ) , -0.13 ( -0.19 to -0.07 ; p<0.001 ) mmol/L. There was no significant association between interventions with a reported theoretical basis and improved intervention outcomes .
No association was observed between intervention intensity ( number of sessions and intervention duration ) and intervention outcomes .
MHBC interventions delivered to CVD-free participants in primary care did not appear to have quantitatively important effects on CVD risk factors .
BACKGROUND It is uncertain whether multiple health behaviour change ( MHBC ) interventions are effective for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease ( CVD ) in primary care .
Effectiveness of two preventive interventions for coronary heart disease in primary care.
OBJECTIVES 1 . To compare a patient-centred , self-directive intervention with conventional care ; 2 . To evaluate longitudinal within-group changes of coronary heart disease risk . METHODS Risk factor changes were evaluated in 110 men with high coronary heart disease risk attending a one year intervention study in general practice . The 22 participating general practice centres were r and omly allocated to follow either a patient-centred , self-directive intervention or a conventional approach . RESULTS No significant between-group differences were found in any single risk factor or in the combined risk of coronary heart disease . The improvement of total risk from screening time to conclusion of the study corresponded with changes of relative risks of CHD to 0.64 ( 95 % CI : 0.54 - 0.77 ) and 0.65 ( 0.54 - 0.77 ) in the patient-centred , self-directive and the conventional care group respectively ( p < 0.0001 in both groups ) . CONCLUSION Everyday general practice clinical work seems as efficacious as a specific intervention method based on currently advocated behaviour change principles
Pooled net change in systolic blood pressure ( 16 trials ) was -1.86 ( 95 % CI -3.17 to -0.55 ; p=0.01 ) mm Hg ; diastolic blood pressure ( 15 trials ) , -1.53 ( -2.43 to -0.62 ; p=0.001 ) mm Hg ; body mass index ( 14 trials ) , -0.13 ( -0.26 to -0.01 ; p=0.04 ) kg/m2 ; serum total cholesterol ( 14 trials ) , -0.13 ( -0.19 to -0.07 ; p<0.001 ) mmol/L. There was no significant association between interventions with a reported theoretical basis and improved intervention outcomes .
No association was observed between intervention intensity ( number of sessions and intervention duration ) and intervention outcomes .
MHBC interventions delivered to CVD-free participants in primary care did not appear to have quantitatively important effects on CVD risk factors .
BACKGROUND It is uncertain whether multiple health behaviour change ( MHBC ) interventions are effective for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease ( CVD ) in primary care .