Levels of evidence for interventions associated with positive effects were : Moderate evidence for arm supports ; and Limited evidence for ergonomics training plus workstation adjustments , new chair and rest breaks .
Levels of evidence for interventions associated with “ no effect ” were : Strong evidence for workstation adjustment alone ; Moderate evidence for biofeedback training and job stress management training ; and Limited evidence for cognitive behavioral training .
No interventions were associated with “ negative effects ” .
Conclusion It is difficult to make strong evidence d-based recommendations about what practitioners should do to prevent or manage upper extremity MSDs .
There is a paucity of high quality OHS interventions evaluating upper extremity MSDs and none focused on traumatic injury outcomes or workplace m and ated pre-placement screening exams .
Background Little is known about the most effective occupational health and safety ( OHS ) interventions to reduce  upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders ( MSDs ) and injuries .
Methods A systematic review used a best evidence synthesis approach to address the question : “ do occupational health and safety interventions have an effect on upper extremity musculoskeletal symptoms , signs , disorders , injuries , cl aims and lost time ? ”
Effects of an active ergonomics training program on risk exposure, worker beliefs, and symptoms in computer users.
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of an active ergonomics training ( AET ) program in computer users . Two constructs from the social-cognitive theory were adopted to provide a more comprehensive assessment of the proximal markers of behavior change . METHOD Eighty-seven symptomatic and asymptomatic employees who worked at a computer for a minimum of 10 hours per week took part in a prospect i ve r and omized controlled study . Subjects participated in a six-hour training intervention at their workplace . Key elements of the AET intervention were skill development in workstation analysis , active participation , and implementation of multiple prevention strategies . RESULTS After receiving AET , risk factor exposure was significantly reduced for participants at higher risk [ F(1,82 ) = 6.42 , p < 0.01 ] . Significant increases in knowledge [ F(1,74 ) = 8.39 , p < 0.01 ] , self-efficacy [ F(1,73 ) = 6.95 , p < 0.01 ] , and outcome expectations [ F(1,75 ) = 8.75 , p < 0.01 ] were found in the intervention group . When the participants were stratified according to the presence of symptoms at baseline , the group with pain that received the AET intervention had significantly less upper back pain intensity ( z = -2.03 , p < 0.05 ) , pain frequency ( z = -2.70 , p < 0.01 ) , and pain duration ( z = -3.25 , p < 0.01 ) post-intervention than the control group with pain . CONCLUSION Results from this study provide evidence that participative training in workstation ergonomics can improve work postures , work practice s , risk factor exposure , and pain
Levels of evidence for interventions associated with positive effects were : Moderate evidence for arm supports ; and Limited evidence for ergonomics training plus workstation adjustments , new chair and rest breaks .
Levels of evidence for interventions associated with “ no effect ” were : Strong evidence for workstation adjustment alone ; Moderate evidence for biofeedback training and job stress management training ; and Limited evidence for cognitive behavioral training .
No interventions were associated with “ negative effects ” .
Conclusion It is difficult to make strong evidence d-based recommendations about what practitioners should do to prevent or manage upper extremity MSDs .
There is a paucity of high quality OHS interventions evaluating upper extremity MSDs and none focused on traumatic injury outcomes or workplace m and ated pre-placement screening exams .
Background Little is known about the most effective occupational health and safety ( OHS ) interventions to reduce  upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders ( MSDs ) and injuries .
Methods A systematic review used a best evidence synthesis approach to address the question : “ do occupational health and safety interventions have an effect on upper extremity musculoskeletal symptoms , signs , disorders , injuries , cl aims and lost time ? ”