Pool analyses indicated that CB ablation was more beneficial in terms of procedural time [ st and ard mean difference = −0.58 ; 95 % confidence interval ( CI ) , −0.85 to −0.30 ] , complications without phrenic nerve injury ( PNI ) [ odds ratio ( OR ) = 0.79 ; 95 % CI , 0.67–0.93 ; I2 = 16 % ] , and recrudescence ( OR = 0.83 ; 95 % CI , 0.70–0.97 ; I2 = 63 % ) for PAF ; however , the total complications of CB was higher than RF .
The subgroup analysis found that , compared with non-contact force radiofrequency ( non-CF-RF ) , both first-generation cryoballoon ( CB1 ) and second-generation cryoballoon ( CB2 ) ablation  could reduce complications with PNI , procedural time , and recrudescence .
However , the safety and efficacy of CB2 was similar to those of CF-RF .
Conclusion Available overall and subgroup data suggested that both CB1 and CB2 were more beneficial than RF ablation , and the main advantages were reflected in comparing them with non-CF-RF .
However , CF-RF and CB2 showed similar clinical benefits
Purpose The present systematic review and meta- analysis aim ed to assess and compare the safety and efficacy of radiofrequency ( RF ) and cryoballoon ( CB ) ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ( PAF ) .
RF and CB ablation are two frequently used methods for pulmonary vein isolation in PAF , but which is a better choice for PAF remains uncertain .
Cellular damage, platelet activation, and inflammatory response after pulmonary vein isolation: a randomized study comparing radiofrequency ablation with cryoablation.
BACKGROUND Experimental data suggest that use of cryoablation in pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) is associated with less cell damage and less thrombus formation compared to radiofrequency ( RF ) energy . OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that cryoablation significantly reduces markers of cell damage , platelet activation , and inflammation in patients undergoing PVI for treatment of atrial fibrillation ( AF ) . METHODS Sixty patients with symptomatic drug-resistant AF ( age 56 ± 9 years , 48 males , 38 with paroxysmal AF ) were r and omly assigned to undergo PVI using either an open irrigated-tip RF catheter or a cryoballoon . Markers of cell damage ( high-sensitive troponin T [ hs-TnT ] , microparticles ) , platelet activation ( platelet reactivity by aggregometry , expression of platelet surface proteins P-selectin and activated glycoprotein [ GP ] IIb/IIIa ) , and inflammatory response ( high-sensitive C-reactive protein [ hs-CRP ] ) were determined before and up to 48 hours after the procedure . RESULTS PVI result ed in a significant rise in hs-TnT , microparticles , markers of platelet activation , and hs-CRP over time , with distinct temporal patterns for each parameter . However , after Bonferroni correction for repeated measurements , no significant differences were noted in these parameters between patients treated with cryoablation or RF energy . Procedural time was significantly shorter in patients treated with cryoballoon ( 177 ± 30 minutes vs 200 ± 46 minutes , P = .03 ) , with no differences in fluoroscopic time , periprocedural complications , or success rate . CONCLUSION Cryoablation and RF energy result in a comparable rise of markers of cell damage , platelet activation and inflammatory response . The data do not support the concept of an improved safety profile for cryoablation in PVI
Pool analyses indicated that CB ablation was more beneficial in terms of procedural time [ st and ard mean difference = −0.58 ; 95 % confidence interval ( CI ) , −0.85 to −0.30 ] , complications without phrenic nerve injury ( PNI ) [ odds ratio ( OR ) = 0.79 ; 95 % CI , 0.67–0.93 ; I2 = 16 % ] , and recrudescence ( OR = 0.83 ; 95 % CI , 0.70–0.97 ; I2 = 63 % ) for PAF ; however , the total complications of CB was higher than RF .
The subgroup analysis found that , compared with non-contact force radiofrequency ( non-CF-RF ) , both first-generation cryoballoon ( CB1 ) and second-generation cryoballoon ( CB2 ) ablation  could reduce complications with PNI , procedural time , and recrudescence .
However , the safety and efficacy of CB2 was similar to those of CF-RF .
Conclusion Available overall and subgroup data suggested that both CB1 and CB2 were more beneficial than RF ablation , and the main advantages were reflected in comparing them with non-CF-RF .
However , CF-RF and CB2 showed similar clinical benefits
Purpose The present systematic review and meta- analysis aim ed to assess and compare the safety and efficacy of radiofrequency ( RF ) and cryoballoon ( CB ) ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ( PAF ) .
RF and CB ablation are two frequently used methods for pulmonary vein isolation in PAF , but which is a better choice for PAF remains uncertain .