There was no major difference in the rate of complications .
Conclusions Short-term recovery favors limited incision over st and ard incision THA .
Background The literature comparing  limited incision and st and ard incision THAs  is confusing regarding whether limited incision THA improves short-term recovery without compromising long-term durability and survival .
Further , previously published meta-analyses can not conclude that limited incision THA is better .
With new data , we seek to discover if the answers now exist .
Purpose We used meta- analysis to compare surgical and hospitalization data , clinical outcomes , and complication rates , and thus ( 1 ) confirm whether limited incision THA is at least comparable to st and ard incision THA ; and ( 2 ) determine whether limited incision THA is an improvement over st and ard incision THA .
Which is more invasive—mini versus standard incisions in total hip arthroplasty?
In this study , interleukin-6 ( IL-6 ) , C-reactive protein ( CRP ) , and haemoglobin levels were evaluated to compare the degree of surgical invasion between mini and st and ard incisions in total hip arthroplasty ( THA ) . Sixty-two patients admitted for primary cementless THA were enrolled in this r and omised study . The patients were allocated to have surgery through either a mini incision of < 10 cm or a st and ard incision of 15 cm . In each group , inflammatory responses were evaluated by IL-6 , CRP , and haemoglobin levels before operation and one day after operation . Significant differences were not found in IL-6 , CRP , and haemoglobin levels between both groups . At six months after surgery , there were no significant differences in postoperative Harris hip scores or radiographic evaluations between both groups . In conclusion , a 5.0 cm difference in the skin incision to the hip joint seemed to have no influence on the degree of surgical invasion during THA.RésuméAfin de mesurer l ’ importance de l’agression chirurgicale tissulaire dans les prothèses totales de hanche , incision st and ard , versus mini-invasifs , les niveaux d’Interleukin 6 ( IL-6 ) de protéine C-réactive ( CRP ) et d’hémoglobine doivent être appréciés . 62 patients devant bénéficier d’une prothèse totale de hanche primaire sans ciment ont été enrôlés dans cette étude r and omisée . Ces patients devaient bénéficier soit d’une mini-incision inférieure à 10 cm , soit d’une incision st and ard supérieure à 15 cm . Chaque groupe a été évalué avec ces différents facteurs biologiques avant l’intervention et un jour après intervention . Il n’a été trouvé aucune différence significative dans les deux groupes avec ces différents marqueurs Inteleukin , CRP et hémoglobine . Six mois après la chirurgie pas de différence significative non plus au niveau des scores de Harris ou au niveau de l’évaluation radiographique . En conclusion , la différence d’incision cutanée de 5 cm ne semble pas avoir d’influence sur l ’ importance des lésions des parties molles au cours d’une prothèse totale de hanche
There was no major difference in the rate of complications .
Conclusions Short-term recovery favors limited incision over st and ard incision THA .
Background The literature comparing  limited incision and st and ard incision THAs  is confusing regarding whether limited incision THA improves short-term recovery without compromising long-term durability and survival .
Further , previously published meta-analyses can not conclude that limited incision THA is better .
With new data , we seek to discover if the answers now exist .
Purpose We used meta- analysis to compare surgical and hospitalization data , clinical outcomes , and complication rates , and thus ( 1 ) confirm whether limited incision THA is at least comparable to st and ard incision THA ; and ( 2 ) determine whether limited incision THA is an improvement over st and ard incision THA .