Where data were available , the relative benefits seen held true both after a single or multiple procedure(s ) .
For patients with persistent atrial fibrillation , CA achieves significantly greater freedom from recurrent atrial fibrillation compared with medical therapy .
BACKGROUND Catheter ablation ( CA ) is commonly performed for persistent atrial fibrillation , but few high- quality r and omized controlled trials ( RCTs ) exist , leading to funding restrictions being proposed in several countries .
We performed a r and om-effects meta- analysis of RCTs and non- RCTs to assess the efficacy of CA for persistent atrial fibrillation .
Long-Term Clinical Results of 2 Different Ablation Strategies in Patients With Paroxysmal and Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
Background — Data regarding the long-term efficacy of atrial fibrillation ( AF ) ablation are still lacking . Methods and Results —Two hundred four consecutive patients symptomatic for paroxysmal or persistent/permanent AF were r and omly assigned to 2 different ablation schemes : pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) and PVI plus left linear lesions ( LL ) . Primary end point was to assess the maintenance of sinus rhythm ( SR ) after procedures 1 and 2 in the absence of antiarrhythmic drugs in a long-term follow-up of at least 3 years . Paroxysmal AF — With a single procedure at 12-month follow-up , 46 % of patients treated with PVI maintained SR , whereas at 3-year follow-up , 29 % were in SR ; using the “ PVI plus LL ” at the 12-month follow-up , 57 % of patients were in SR , whereas at the 3-year follow-up , 53 % remained in SR . After a second procedure , the long-term overall success rate without antiarrhythmic drugs was 62 % with PVI and 85 % with PVI plus LL . Persistent/Permanent AF — With a single procedure at the 12-month follow-up , 27 % of patients treated with PVI were in SR , whereas at the 3-year follow-up , 19 % maintained SR ; using the PVI plus LL with a single procedure at the 12-month follow-up 45 % of patients were in SR , whereas at the 3-year follow-up , 41 % remained in SR . After a second procedure , the long-term overall success rate without antiarrhythmic drugs was 39 % with PVI and 75 % with PVI plus LL . Conclusions —A long-term follow-up of AF ablation shows that short-term results can not be considered permanent because AF recurrences are still present after the first year especially in patients who have had “ PVI ” strategy .  PVI isolation plus LL is superior to the PVI strategy in maintaining SR without antiarrhythmic drugs after procedures 1 and 2 both in paroxysmal and persistent AF
Where data were available , the relative benefits seen held true both after a single or multiple procedure(s ) .
For patients with persistent atrial fibrillation , CA achieves significantly greater freedom from recurrent atrial fibrillation compared with medical therapy .
BACKGROUND Catheter ablation ( CA ) is commonly performed for persistent atrial fibrillation , but few high- quality r and omized controlled trials ( RCTs ) exist , leading to funding restrictions being proposed in several countries .
We performed a r and om-effects meta- analysis of RCTs and non- RCTs to assess the efficacy of CA for persistent atrial fibrillation .