The present evidence indicated the similar performance in survivorship among CoC , CoPc , CoPxl and MoPxl bearing implants , and that all likely have superiority compared with the MoM and MoPc bearing implants in THA procedures .
PURPOSE Although many  total hip bearing implants  are widely used all over the world , simultaneous comparisons across the numerous available bearing surfaces are rare .
The purpose of this study was to compare the survivorship of total hip arthroplasty ( THA ) with six available bearing implants .
High Incidence of Squeaking in THAs with Alumina Ceramic-on-ceramic Bearings
Abstract Ceramic-on-ceramic bearings in THA are a popular alternative to overcome wear concerns in traditional metal-polyethylene bearings . However , squeaking is a potentially worrisome phenomenon in ceramic-on-ceramic THAs which we observed in some of our patients . We review ed all 42 patients who underwent 43 ceramic-on-ceramic noncemented THAs during the time of the study .  Squeaking , defined as a reproducible sound of squeaking , clicking , or grating , occurred in nine of 43 implants ( 20.9 % ) . St and ard radiographs were normal . We used CT imaging to determine cup anteversion and inclination angles , comparing the squeaking hips with those of a r and omly selected control group , but found no differences . We then hypothesized specific design features ( stem size , cup size , head size , and neck length of the head ) would be risk factors for squeaking . We found a difference in neck length between squeaking and nonsqueaking implants . A neck length of −4 mm or shorter result ed in a relative risk of 5.56 ( 95 % confidence interval , 1.14–27.01 ) for squeaking . We found a high incidence of squeaking in our population , and we believe this phenomenon is an underreported side effect of these types of bearings . A short neck length of the femoral implant was a risk factor for squeaking in ceramic-on-ceramic THA . Level of Evidence : Level III , therapeutic study
The present evidence indicated the similar performance in survivorship among CoC , CoPc , CoPxl and MoPxl bearing implants , and that all likely have superiority compared with the MoM and MoPc bearing implants in THA procedures .
PURPOSE Although many  total hip bearing implants  are widely used all over the world , simultaneous comparisons across the numerous available bearing surfaces are rare .
The purpose of this study was to compare the survivorship of total hip arthroplasty ( THA ) with six available bearing implants .