We found that there was no significant benefit from using PS instrumentation in primary knee arthroplasty to aid in the positioning of either the tibial or femoral components .
Furthermore sagittal plane tibial component positioning was worse in the PS than the traditional ST group .
Our results suggest that at present PS instrumentation is not superior to ST instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty .
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to review the radiological alignment outcomes of patient Specific ( PS ) cutting blocks and St and ard Instrumentation in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty .
METHODS We hypothesized that the use of PS techniques would significantly improve sagittal , coronal and rotational alignment of the prosthesis on short term .
Is TKA Using Patient-specific Instruments Comparable to Conventional TKA? A Randomized Controlled Study of One System
Background Patient-specific CT-based instrumentation may reduce implant malpositioning and improve alignment in TKA . However , it is not known whether this innovation is an advance that benefits patients . Questions / purpose sWe evaluated ( 1 ) the precision of  patient-specific TKA by comparing the incidence of outliers in postoperative alignment between TKAs using  patient-specific instruments  and TKAs using conventional instruments , and ( 2 ) the reliability of patient-specific instruments by intraoperatively investigating whether the surgery could be completed with patient-specific instruments alone . Methods In this r and omized controlled trial , we compared  patient-specific TKA instruments from one manufacturer ( n = 50 ) with conventional TKA instruments ( n = 50 ) . Postoperative hip-knee-ankle angles , femoral component rotation , and coronal and sagittal alignments of each component were measured . The validity of the patient-specific instrument was examined using cross-checking procedures with conventional instruments during the surgeries . When the procedure could not be completed accurately with patient-specific instruments , the procedure was converted to TKA using conventional instruments , and the frequency of this occurrence was tallied . Results Outliers in the hip-knee-ankle angle were comparable between groups ( 12 % in the patient-specific instrument group and 10 % in the conventional instrument group ) . Other parameters such as sagittal alignment and femoral component rotation did not differ in terms of outliers . Patient-specific guides were ab and oned in eight knees ( 16 % ) during the surgery because of malrotation of the femoral components and decreased slope of the tibia . Conclusions Accuracy was comparable between TKAs done with patient-specific instruments and those done with conventional instruments . However , the patient-specific instrument procedures had to be aborted frequently , incurring expenses that did not benefit patients .Level of Evidence Level II , therapeutic study . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence
We found that there was no significant benefit from using PS instrumentation in primary knee arthroplasty to aid in the positioning of either the tibial or femoral components .
Furthermore sagittal plane tibial component positioning was worse in the PS than the traditional ST group .
Our results suggest that at present PS instrumentation is not superior to ST instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty .
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to review the radiological alignment outcomes of patient Specific ( PS ) cutting blocks and St and ard Instrumentation in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty .
METHODS We hypothesized that the use of PS techniques would significantly improve sagittal , coronal and rotational alignment of the prosthesis on short term .