RESULTS Knowledge translation interventions appear to have result ed in a positive change in physiotherapist beliefs , attitudes , skills and guideline awareness .
However , no consistent improvement in clinical practice , patient and economic outcomes were observed .
AND IMPLICATION OF KEY FINDINGS The intensity and type of knowledge translation intervention seem to have an effect on practice change .
BACKGROUND Many physiotherapists underuse evidence -based practice guidelines or recommendations when treating patients with musculoskeletal disorders , yet synthesis of knowledge translation interventions used within the field of physiotherapy fails to offer clear conclusions to guide the implementation of clinical practice guidelines .
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effectiveness of various  knowledge translation interventions used to implement changes in the practice of current physiotherapists treating common musculoskeletal issues .
Does Teaching Physical Therapists to Deliver a Biopsychosocial Treatment Program Result in Better Patient Outcomes? A Randomized Controlled Trial
Background Psychosocial prognostic factors are important in the development of chronic pain , but treatment providers often lack knowledge and skills to assess and address these risk factors . Objective The aim of this study was to examine the effects on outcomes ( pain and disability ) in patients of a course about psychosocial prognostic factors for physical therapists . Design This study was a r and omized , controlled trial . Setting The setting was primary care practice . Participants Forty-two primary care physical therapists attended an 8-day university course ( over 8 weeks ) aim ed at identifying and addressing psychosocial risk factors . Intervention The physical therapists were r and omly assigned to either the course or a waiting list . They treated consecutive patients with acute and subacute musculoskeletal pain both before and after the course . Measurements We measured physical therapists ' attitudes and beliefs about psychosocial factors , knowledge , and skills before and after the course . We measured patients ' pain , disability , catastrophizing , and mood at the start of treatment and at a 6-month follow-up . Methods The physical therapists were r and omly assigned to either the course or a waiting list . They treated consecutive patients with acute and subacute musculoskeletal pain both before and after the course . Results Pain and disability outcomes in all patients of physical therapists who had participated in the course or in patients at risk of developing long-term disability who had higher levels of catastrophizing or depression were not significantly different from those outcomes in patients of physical therapists who had not participated in the course . Pain and disability outcomes in patients with a low risk of developing long-term disability— and pain outcomes in patients with a high risk of developing long-term disability — were not dependent upon whether the attitudes and beliefs of their physical therapists changed during the course . However , disability outcomes in patients with a high risk of developing long-term disability may have been influenced by whether the attitudes and beliefs of their physical therapists changed . Limitations A limitation of this study was that actual practice behavior was not measured . Conclusions An 8-day university course for physical therapists did not improve outcomes in a group of patients as a whole or in patients with a risk of developing long-term disability . However , patients who had a risk of developing long-term disability and had higher levels of catastrophizing or depression may have shown greater reductions in disability if the attitudes and beliefs of their physical therapists changed during the course
RESULTS Knowledge translation interventions appear to have result ed in a positive change in physiotherapist beliefs , attitudes , skills and guideline awareness .
However , no consistent improvement in clinical practice , patient and economic outcomes were observed .
AND IMPLICATION OF KEY FINDINGS The intensity and type of knowledge translation intervention seem to have an effect on practice change .
BACKGROUND Many physiotherapists underuse evidence -based practice guidelines or recommendations when treating patients with musculoskeletal disorders , yet synthesis of knowledge translation interventions used within the field of physiotherapy fails to offer clear conclusions to guide the implementation of clinical practice guidelines .
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effectiveness of various  knowledge translation interventions used to implement changes in the practice of current physiotherapists treating common musculoskeletal issues .