Conclusion Stroke secondary prevention lifestyle interventions are effective in terms of effecting positive change in lifestyle behaviors and secondary outcomes , and appear promising in relation to physiological outcomes .
There was insufficient evidence to determine the effect of intervention on incidence of stroke recurrence
Background A feature of stroke is that it recurs ( 25 % within five-years ) .
Risk factors for stroke and recurrent stroke include smoking , alcohol consumption , poor diet , and physical inactivity .
Aim To evaluate the effectiveness of secondary prevention lifestyle interventions design ed to change lifestyle behavior following stroke .
This short paper presents a summary of the systematic review process and findings .
Does behaviour modification affect post-stroke risk factor control? Three-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial
Objective : Little is known about the long-term effectiveness after stroke of interventions for behaviour modification and ensuring concordance with therapies . We describe a follow-up study of a previous r and omized controlled trial of a brief period of behaviour modification . The aim of this study was to determine outcomes three years after the initial intervention . Design : Survivors of the original cohort were contacted and asked to attend for follow-up interview , within a geriatric day hospital . This study was carried out in the Geriatric Day Hospital at Stobhill Hospital , Balornock Road , Glasgow . Interventions : Details of risk factor control , including blood pressure , cholesterol levels and diabetic control , were assessed . Question naires used in the initial study were repeated including the Geriatric Depression Scale score , Euroqol Perceived Health Status and Stroke Services Satisfaction Question naire . Main measures : Primary outcome was collective risk factor control . Clinical outcomes including recurrent cerebrovascular events , medication persistence and perceived health status were also recorded . Results : Mean length of follow-up was 3.6 years ( SD 0.43 ) . Of the 205 patients enrolled in the initial study , 102 patients attended for repeat interview ( 49 intervention/53 control ) . There were no significant differences in the percentage of controlled risk factors between groups ( intervention 51.7 % versus control 55.9 % , P = 0.53 ) . Similarities were observed in the number of recurrent clinical events and medication persistence between groups . No overall difference was observed in perceived health status , satisfaction with care or depression scores . Conclusions : Brief intervention with respect to behaviour modification and risk factor control does not appear to have any long-term benefit . These results must be cautiously interpreted in light of the small study number and further research is required
Conclusion Stroke secondary prevention lifestyle interventions are effective in terms of effecting positive change in lifestyle behaviors and secondary outcomes , and appear promising in relation to physiological outcomes .
There was insufficient evidence to determine the effect of intervention on incidence of stroke recurrence
Background A feature of stroke is that it recurs ( 25 % within five-years ) .
Risk factors for stroke and recurrent stroke include smoking , alcohol consumption , poor diet , and physical inactivity .
Aim To evaluate the effectiveness of secondary prevention lifestyle interventions design ed to change lifestyle behavior following stroke .
This short paper presents a summary of the systematic review process and findings .