A minority of published evidence -based PA interventions for adults with T2D were both effective and pragmatic for clinical implementation .
Although regular physical activity ( PA ) is a cornerstone of treatment for type 2 diabetes ( T2D ) , most adults with T2D are sedentary .
R and omized controlled trials ( RCTs ) have proven the effectiveness of PA behavioral interventions for adults with T2D but have rarely been conducted in healthcare setting s. We sought to identify PA interventions that are effective and practical to implement in clinical practice setting s. Our first aim was to use the valid Pragmatic-Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary 2 ( PRECIS-2 ) tool to assess the potential for future implementation of PA interventions in clinical practice setting s. Our second aim was to identify interventions that effectively increased PA and glycemic control among the interventions in the top tertile of PRECIS-2 scores .
[Group versus individual education for type-2 diabetes patients].
OBJECTIVES To compare the effectiveness of group ( GE ) and individual ( IE ) health education in type-2 diabetes patients , and identify the improvement in knowledge , metabolic control and risk factors . DESIGN R and omised clinical trial . SETTING Primary care . Participants . 68 patients with type-2 diabetes , diagnosed 6 months before the start of the study and who had not received GE . Patients aged over 75 , those with sensory , psychological and /or physical deficiencies and those not monitored in primary care were excluded ( alpha=0.05 ; beta=0.2 ) . Interventions . Patients were selected according to the inclusion criteria and allocated at r and om to the IE ( n=33 ) or GE ( n=35 ) group . Individual and group lessons were given at the same time for a year . The contents were evaluated with a vali date d , self-administered test . MAIN MEASUREMENTS General , demographic variables , analyses , blood pressure , the Body Mass Index ( BMI ) , the presence of cardiovascular risk factors , diabetes-related complications and therapeutic variables were all measured . RESULTS The two kinds of education showed no significant differences from each other . The two groups improved the level of knowledge ( P<0.001 ) , and reduced HbA1c ( P<0.001 ) , HDL-C ( P<0.001 ) , the BMI ( P=0.001 ) and systolic pressure ( P=0.004 ) , and increased their use of reactive strips ( P=0.02 ) . CONCLUSIONS Health education on diabetes improved knowledge of the disease , metabolic control and cardiovascular risk factors . The two educational methods evaluated were equally effective
A minority of published evidence -based PA interventions for adults with T2D were both effective and pragmatic for clinical implementation .
Although regular physical activity ( PA ) is a cornerstone of treatment for type 2 diabetes ( T2D ) , most adults with T2D are sedentary .
R and omized controlled trials ( RCTs ) have proven the effectiveness of PA behavioral interventions for adults with T2D but have rarely been conducted in healthcare setting s. We sought to identify PA interventions that are effective and practical to implement in clinical practice setting s. Our first aim was to use the valid Pragmatic-Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary 2 ( PRECIS-2 ) tool to assess the potential for future implementation of PA interventions in clinical practice setting s. Our second aim was to identify interventions that effectively increased PA and glycemic control among the interventions in the top tertile of PRECIS-2 scores .