Systematic and opportunistic screening for AF increase the rate of detection of new cases compared with routine practice .
While both approaches have a comparable effect on the overall AF diagnosis rate , the cost of systematic screening is significantly more than that of opportunistic screening from the perspective of the health service provider .
BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is the most common arrhythmia in clinical practice and is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality .
Screening for AF in asymptomatic patients has been proposed as a way of reducing the burden of the disease by detecting people who would benefit from prophylactic anticoagulation therapy prior to the onset of symptoms .
However , for screening to be an effective intervention it must improve the detection of AF and provide benefit for those who are detected earlier as a result of screening .
OBJECTIVES The primary objective of this review was to examine whether screening programmes increase the detection of new cases of AF compared to routine practice .
The secondary objectives were to identify which combination of screening strategy and patient population is most effective , as well as assessing any safety issues associated with screening , its acceptability within the target population and the costs involved .
A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation.
BACKGROUND There are two approaches to the treatment of atrial fibrillation : one is cardioversion and treatment with antiarrhythmic drugs to maintain sinus rhythm , and the other is the use of rate-controlling drugs , allowing atrial fibrillation to persist . In both approaches , the use of anticoagulant drugs is recommended . METHODS We conducted a r and omized , multicenter comparison of these two treatment strategies in patients with atrial fibrillation and a high risk of stroke or death . The primary end point was overall mortality . RESULTS A total of 4060 patients ( mean [ + /-SD ] age , 69.7+/-9.0 years ) were enrolled in the study ; 70.8 percent had a history of hypertension , and 38.2 percent had coronary artery disease . Of the 3311 patients with echocardiograms , the left atrium was enlarged in 64.7 percent and left ventricular function was depressed in 26.0 percent . There were 356 deaths among the patients assigned to rhythm-control therapy and 310 deaths among those assigned to rate-control therapy ( mortality at five years , 23.8 percent and 21.3 percent , respectively ; hazard ratio , 1.15 [ 95 percent confidence interval , 0.99 to 1.34 ] ; P=0.08 ) . More patients in the rhythm-control group than in the rate-control group were hospitalized , and there were more adverse drug effects in the rhythm-control group as well . In both groups , the majority of strokes occurred after warfarin had been stopped or when the international normalized ratio was subtherapeutic . CONCLUSIONS Management of atrial fibrillation with the rhythm-control strategy offers no survival advantage over the rate-control strategy , and there are potential advantages , such as a lower risk of adverse drug effects , with the rate-control strategy . Anticoagulation should be continued in this group of high-risk patients
Systematic and opportunistic screening for AF increase the rate of detection of new cases compared with routine practice .
While both approaches have a comparable effect on the overall AF diagnosis rate , the cost of systematic screening is significantly more than that of opportunistic screening from the perspective of the health service provider .
BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is the most common arrhythmia in clinical practice and is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality .
Screening for AF in asymptomatic patients has been proposed as a way of reducing the burden of the disease by detecting people who would benefit from prophylactic anticoagulation therapy prior to the onset of symptoms .
However , for screening to be an effective intervention it must improve the detection of AF and provide benefit for those who are detected earlier as a result of screening .
OBJECTIVES The primary objective of this review was to examine whether screening programmes increase the detection of new cases of AF compared to routine practice .
The secondary objectives were to identify which combination of screening strategy and patient population is most effective , as well as assessing any safety issues associated with screening , its acceptability within the target population and the costs involved .