Finally , muscle power testing was found to be safe in older people with a broad range of health and functional states
Background Muscle power has been proposed to be the primary therapeutic target for resistance training interventions aim ed at enhancing physical function in older adults .
However , no recommendations exist on ideal testing protocol s to assess muscle power in older adults , and the safety of this procedure has not been adequately evaluated in the literature .
Methods A systematic review was conducted to identify studies evaluating muscle power exerted by older people in resistance exercises through May 2017 .
High-velocity resistance training increases skeletal muscle peak power in older women.
OBJECTIVES Peak power declines more precipitously than strength with advancing age and is a reliable measure of impairment and a strong predictor of functional performance . We tested the hypothesis that a high-velocity resistance-training program ( HI ) would increase muscle power more than a traditional low-velocity resistance-training program ( LO ) . DESIGN R and omized controlled trial . SETTING University-based human physiology laboratory . PARTICIPANTS Thirty women with self-reported dis-ability ( aged 73 + 1 , body mass index 30.1 + 1.1 kg/mn ) . INTERVENTION We conducted a r and omized trial comparing changes in skeletal muscle power and strength after 16 weeks of HI or LO . Training was performed three times per week , and subjects completed three sets ( 8 - 10 repetitions ) of leg press ( LP ) and knee extension ( KE ) exercises at 70 % of the one-repetition maximum ( IRM ) . MEASUREMENTS One-repetition maximum ( 1 RM ) and peak power for KE and LP . RESULTS LP and KE relative training force and total work were similar between groups ( P > .05 ) . However , HI generated significantly higher power during training sessions than LO for LP ( 3.7-fold greater , P < .001 ) and KE ( 2.1-fold greater , P < .001 ) . Although LP and KE 1RM muscle strength increased similarly in both groups asa result of the training ( P < .001 ) , LP peak power increased significantly more in HI than in LO ( 267 W vs 139 W , P < .001 ) . Furthermore , HI result ed in a significantly greater improvement in LP power at 40 % , 50 % , 60%,70 % , 80 % , and 90 % of the 1 RM than did LO ( P < .05 ) . CONCLUSIONS HI improved 1RM strength similarly and was more effective in improving peak power than was traditional LO in older women . Improvements in lower extremity peak power may exert a greater influence on age-associated reductions in physical functioning than other exercise interventions
Finally , muscle power testing was found to be safe in older people with a broad range of health and functional states
Background Muscle power has been proposed to be the primary therapeutic target for resistance training interventions aim ed at enhancing physical function in older adults .
However , no recommendations exist on ideal testing protocol s to assess muscle power in older adults , and the safety of this procedure has not been adequately evaluated in the literature .
Methods A systematic review was conducted to identify studies evaluating muscle power exerted by older people in resistance exercises through May 2017 .