D. Restoration of sinus rhythm for monophasic vs. biphasic waveforms .
Another study showed that PVI result ed in long-term restoration
Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is a major public health problem in the United States .
More than 2.3 million Americans are estimated to have AF ( 1 ) .
The known association between AF and substantial mortality , morbidity , and health care costs compounds the effect of this condition .
Not only is the risk for death in patients with AF twice that of patients without it , but AF can result in myocardial ischemia and infa rct ion , exacerbate heart failure ( HF ) , and cause tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy if the ventricular rate is not well-controlled ( 25 ) .
The most dreaded complication of AF is thromboembolism , especially stroke ( 6 ) .
In some patients , AF or therapies to manage this condition can severely depreciate quality of life ( 710 ) .
Furthermore , the management of AF and its complications is responsible for nearly $ 16 billion in additional costs to the U.S. health care system per year ( 11 ) .
We conducted this systematic review to evaluate the comparative safety and effectiveness of rate- versus rhythm-control strategies ;  medications used for ventricular rate control ; strict versus more lenient rate-control strategies ; nonpharmacologic rate-control therapies  versus medications ; electrical cardioversion and antiarrhythmic medications  for restoration of sinus rhythm ;  and  catheter ablation , surgical ablation , and antiarrhythmic medications  for maintenance of sinus rhythm .
Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2: results from a randomized study comparing pulmonary vein isolation versus antiarrhythmic drug therapy.
INTRODUCTION Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) and diabetes mellitus type 2 ( DM2 ) often coexist ; however , a small number of patients with DM2 undergoing catheter ablation ( CA ) of AF  have been included in previous studies . The aim of this study was to evaluate safety and efficacy of ablation therapy in DM2 patients with drug refractory AF . METHODS AND RESULTS From January 2005 to September 2006 , 70 patients with a diagnosis of DM2 and paroxysmal ( n = 29 ) or persistent ( n = 41 ) AF were r and omized to receive either pulmonary vein isolation or a new antiarrhythmic drug treatment ( ADT ) with a 1-year follow-up . The primary endpoint was the time to first AF recurrence . By Kaplan-Meier analysis , at the end of follow-up , 42.9 % of patients in the ADT group and 80 % of patients who received a single ablation procedure and were without medications were free of AF ( P = 0.001 ) . In the ablation group , a significant improvement in quality -of-life ( QoL ) scores as compared with ADT group was observed . Six patients in the ADT group ( 17.1 % ) developed significant adverse drug effects . Hospitalization rate during follow-up was higher in the ADT group ( P = 0.01 ) . The only complication attributable to ablation was one significant access-site hematoma . CONCLUSION In patients with DM2 , CA of AF provides significant clinical benefits over the ADT and appears to be a reasonable approach regarding feasibility , effectiveness , and low procedural risk
D. Restoration of sinus rhythm for monophasic vs. biphasic waveforms .
Another study showed that PVI result ed in long-term restoration
Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is a major public health problem in the United States .
More than 2.3 million Americans are estimated to have AF ( 1 ) .
The known association between AF and substantial mortality , morbidity , and health care costs compounds the effect of this condition .
Not only is the risk for death in patients with AF twice that of patients without it , but AF can result in myocardial ischemia and infa rct ion , exacerbate heart failure ( HF ) , and cause tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy if the ventricular rate is not well-controlled ( 25 ) .
The most dreaded complication of AF is thromboembolism , especially stroke ( 6 ) .
In some patients , AF or therapies to manage this condition can severely depreciate quality of life ( 710 ) .
Furthermore , the management of AF and its complications is responsible for nearly $ 16 billion in additional costs to the U.S. health care system per year ( 11 ) .
We conducted this systematic review to evaluate the comparative safety and effectiveness of rate- versus rhythm-control strategies ;  medications used for ventricular rate control ; strict versus more lenient rate-control strategies ; nonpharmacologic rate-control therapies  versus medications ; electrical cardioversion and antiarrhythmic medications  for restoration of sinus rhythm ;  and  catheter ablation , surgical ablation , and antiarrhythmic medications  for maintenance of sinus rhythm .