Based on improvement of mean International Prostate Symptom Score and quality of life scores , the effectiveness of the newer ABs was not different from the older ABs ( moderate strength of evidence [ SOE ] ) , but had more AEs ( low SOE ) .
Antimuscarinics/AB combination therapy had similar outcomes  as AB monotherapy ( all moderate SOE ) , but often had more AEs .
Phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors alone or in combination with ABs had similar or inferior outcomes than ABs alone .
Evidence was insufficient for the beta-3 adrenoceptor agonist .
For all newer agents , the evidence was generally insufficient to assess long-term efficacy , prevention of symptom progression , or AEs .
None of the drugs or drug combinations newly used to treat LUTS attributed to BPH showed outcomes superior to traditional AB treatment .
Given the lack of superior outcomes , the studies ' short time-horizon , and less assurance of their safety , their current value in treating LUTS attributable to BPH appears low .
We found none of the new drugs to be better but there was more concern about side effects
CONTEXT Alpha-blockers ( ABs ) and 5-alpha reductase inhibitors have an established role in treating male lower urinary tract symptoms ( LUTS ) attributed to benign prostatic hyperplasia ( BPH ) .
Recently , newer drugs have shown promise for this indication .
OBJECTIVE To assess the comparative effectiveness and adverse effects ( AEs ) of newer drugs to treat LUTS attributed to BPH through a systematic review and meta- analysis .
PATIENT SUMMARY In this paper , we review ed the evidence of newer drugs to treat men with urinary problems attributable to an enlarged prostate .
Safety and tolerability of solifenacin add-on therapy to alpha-blocker treated men with residual urgency and frequency.
PURPOSE VICTOR was a 12-week , double-blind , placebo controlled trial assessing the safety and tolerability of solifenacin plus tamsulosin in men with residual overactive bladder symptoms after tamsulosin monotherapy .  Efficacy of solifenacin plus tamsulosin vs placebo plus tamsulosin was also evaluated . MATERIAL S AND METHODS A total of 398 men 45 years old or older were r and omized to 12 weeks of solifenacin plus tamsulosin or placebo plus tamsulosin once daily . The study population had 8 or more micturitions per 24 hours and 1 or more urgency episode per 24 hours after taking tamsulosin for 4 or more weeks , a total International Prostate Symptom Score of 13 or greater , a Patient Perception of Bladder Condition score of 3 or greater , a post-void residual of 200 ml or less and a peak flow rate of 5 ml per second or greater . Adverse events were monitored throughout the study . The primary efficacy end point was mean change from baseline to week 12 in micturitions per 24 hours . Secondary measures included mean change in urgency episodes per 24 hours , and changes in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition , Urgency Perception Scale and total International Prostate Symptom Scores . RESULTS The most frequent adverse events in the solifenacin plus tamsulosin and placebo plus tamsulosin groups were dry mouth ( 7 % and 3 % , respectively ) and dizziness ( 3 % and 2 % , respectively ) . Of the patients on solifenacin plus tamsulosin 7 ( 3 % ) reported retention and 3 required catheterization . No patients on placebo plus tamsulosin reported retention . Patients on solifenacin plus tamsulosin vs placebo plus tamsulosin showed larger reductions in frequency but not of statistical significance ( -1.05 vs -0.67 , p = 0.135 ) . However , patients on solifenacin plus tamsulosin vs placebo plus tamsulosin did show statistically significant reductions in urgency ( -2.18 vs -1.10 , p < 0.001 ) . Patient reported outcome measures showed no significant between group differences . CONCLUSIONS Solifenacin plus tamsulosin was well tolerated . There was a low incidence of urinary retention requiring catheterization . At week 12 solifenacin plus tamsulosin decreased daily micturitions and urgency episodes . Only urgency reached statistical significance vs placebo plus tamsulosin
Based on improvement of mean International Prostate Symptom Score and quality of life scores , the effectiveness of the newer ABs was not different from the older ABs ( moderate strength of evidence [ SOE ] ) , but had more AEs ( low SOE ) .
Antimuscarinics/AB combination therapy had similar outcomes  as AB monotherapy ( all moderate SOE ) , but often had more AEs .
Phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors alone or in combination with ABs had similar or inferior outcomes than ABs alone .
Evidence was insufficient for the beta-3 adrenoceptor agonist .
For all newer agents , the evidence was generally insufficient to assess long-term efficacy , prevention of symptom progression , or AEs .
None of the drugs or drug combinations newly used to treat LUTS attributed to BPH showed outcomes superior to traditional AB treatment .
Given the lack of superior outcomes , the studies ' short time-horizon , and less assurance of their safety , their current value in treating LUTS attributable to BPH appears low .
We found none of the new drugs to be better but there was more concern about side effects
CONTEXT Alpha-blockers ( ABs ) and 5-alpha reductase inhibitors have an established role in treating male lower urinary tract symptoms ( LUTS ) attributed to benign prostatic hyperplasia ( BPH ) .
Recently , newer drugs have shown promise for this indication .
OBJECTIVE To assess the comparative effectiveness and adverse effects ( AEs ) of newer drugs to treat LUTS attributed to BPH through a systematic review and meta- analysis .
PATIENT SUMMARY In this paper , we review ed the evidence of newer drugs to treat men with urinary problems attributable to an enlarged prostate .