Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
Resistance exercise in men receiving androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer.
PURPOSE And rogen deprivation therapy is a common treatment in men with prostate cancer that may cause fatigue , functional decline , increased body fatness , and loss of lean body tissue . These physical changes can negatively affect health-related quality of life .  Resistance exercise may help to counter some of these side effects by reducing fatigue , elevating mood , building muscle mass , and reducing body fat . METHODS In a two-site study , 155 men with prostate cancer who were scheduled to receive and rogen deprivation therapy for at least 3 months after recruitment were r and omly assigned to an intervention group that participated in a resistance exercise program three times per week for 12 weeks ( 82 men ) or to a waiting list control group ( 73 men ) . The primary outcomes were fatigue and disease-specific quality of life as assessed by self-reported question naires after 12 weeks . Secondary outcomes were muscular fitness and body composition . RESULTS Men assigned to resistance exercise had less interference from fatigue on activities of daily living ( P = .002 ) and higher quality of life ( P = .001 ) than men in the control group . Men in the intervention group demonstrated higher levels of upper body ( P = .009 ) and lower body ( P < .001 ) muscular fitness than men in the control group . The 12-week resistance exercise intervention did not improve body composition as measured by changes in body weight , body mass index , waist circumference , or subcutaneous skinfolds . CONCLUSION Resistance exercise reduces fatigue and improves quality of life and muscular fitness in men with prostate cancer receiving and rogen deprivation therapy .  This form of exercise can be an important component of supportive care for these patients
Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?