There was no significant between group difference in six-minute walk test distance .
Conclusions Our meta- analysis showed WPAM with exercise prescription or advice are superior to no device in improving CRF in the maintenance phase of CR and no cardiac adverse events were reported with WPAM use .
Our qualitative analysis showed evidence in favour of WPAM with exercise prescription or advice for both CRF and step count .
WPAM with exercise prescription or advice did not change sedentary time .
Background Physical activity ( PA ) is a component of cardiac rehabilitation ( CR ) .
However , life-long engagement in PA is required to maintain benefits gained .
Wearable PA monitoring devices ( WPAM ) are thought to increase PA .
There appear to be no review s which investigate the effect of WPAM in cardiac population s. We firstly aim ed to systematic ally review r and omised controlled trials within the cardiac population that investigated the effect WPAM had through the maintenance phase of CR .
We specifically examined the effect on cardiorespiratory fitness ( CRF ) , amount and intensity of daily PA , and sedentary time .
Telephone support oriented by accelerometric measurements enhances adherence to physical activity recommendations in noncompliant patients after a cardiac rehabilitation program.
OBJECTIVE To assess the efficacy of a strategy , based on telephone support oriented by accelerometer measurements , on the adherence to physical activity ( PA ) recommendations in cardiac patients not achieving PA recommendations . DESIGN Prospect i ve and r and omized study . SETTING A cardiac rehabilitation program ( CRP ) at a clinic . PARTICIPANTS Stable , noncompliant cardiac ( coronary artery disease , heart failure , post-cardiovascular surgery ) patients ( weekly moderate-intensity PA < 150 min ) were r and omly assigned to an intervention group ( n=19 ) or a control group ( n=10 ) . INTERVENTIONS The intervention group wore an accelerometer for 8 weeks . Every 15 days , feedback and support were provided by telephone . The control group wore the accelerometer during the 8th week of the intervention only . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Active energy expenditure ( EE ) ( in kilocalories ) and the time spent doing light , moderate , or intense PA ( minutes per week ) . RESULTS In the intervention group , the time spent at moderate-intensity PA increased from 95.6±80.7 to 137.2±87.5 min/wk between the 1st and 8th week ( P=.002 ) , with 36.8 % of the sample achieving the target amount of moderate-intensity PA . During the 8th week , the EE averaged 543.7±144.1 kcal and 266.7±107.4 kcal in the intervention group and control group , respectively ( P=.004 ) . CONCLUSIONS Telephone support based on accelerometer recordings appeared to be an effective strategy to improve adherence to PA in noncompliant patients . This intervention could be implemented after a CRP as an inexpensive , modern , and easy-to-use strategy
There was no significant between group difference in six-minute walk test distance .
Conclusions Our meta- analysis showed WPAM with exercise prescription or advice are superior to no device in improving CRF in the maintenance phase of CR and no cardiac adverse events were reported with WPAM use .
Our qualitative analysis showed evidence in favour of WPAM with exercise prescription or advice for both CRF and step count .
WPAM with exercise prescription or advice did not change sedentary time .
Background Physical activity ( PA ) is a component of cardiac rehabilitation ( CR ) .
However , life-long engagement in PA is required to maintain benefits gained .
Wearable PA monitoring devices ( WPAM ) are thought to increase PA .
There appear to be no review s which investigate the effect of WPAM in cardiac population s. We firstly aim ed to systematic ally review r and omised controlled trials within the cardiac population that investigated the effect WPAM had through the maintenance phase of CR .
We specifically examined the effect on cardiorespiratory fitness ( CRF ) , amount and intensity of daily PA , and sedentary time .