The EQ-5D and SF-36 achieved mixed results in the quantitative testing against psychometric criteria .
The qualitative analysis suggests this is because they provide a very limited coverage of themes identified by people with mental health problems .
BACKGROUND Generic preference-based measures of health like the EQ-5D and SF-6D ( ® ) are increasingly being used in economic evaluation and outcome assessment .
However , there are concerns as to whether or not these generic measures are appropriate for use in people with mental health problems .
OBJECTIVES The EQ-5D and SF-36 ( ® ) ( including its derivatives the SF-12 ( ® ) and SF-6D ) were assessed using the psychometric criteria of validity and responsiveness using quantitative and qualitative methods .
Another aim was to estimate mapping functions between the EQ-5D and SF-6D and condition-specific measures , where appropriate .
Effectiveness of Outpatient, Day Hospital, and Inpatient Psychotherapeutic Treatment for Patients with Cluster B Personality Disorders
Background : For patients with cluster B personality disorders there is no consensus regarding the optimal treatment setting . The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of different psychotherapeutic setting s for patients with cluster B personality disorders , i.e. outpatient , day hospital , and inpatient treatment . Methods : The study was conducted between March 2003 and June 2008 in 6 mental health care centres in the Netherl and s , with a sample of 207 patients with a DSM-IV-TR axis II cluster B diagnosis . Patients were assigned to 3 different setting s of psychotherapeutic treatment and effectiveness was assessed at 18 months after baseline . An intention-to-treat analysis was conducted for psychiatric symptoms ( Brief Symptom Inventory ) , psychosocial functioning ( Outcome Question naire-45 ) , and quality of life ( EQ-5D ) , using multilevel statistical modelling . As the study was non-r and omised , the propensity score method was used to control for initial differences . Results : Patients in all 3 setting s improved significantly in terms of psychiatric symptoms , social and interpersonal functioning , and quality of life 18 months after baseline . The inpatient group showed the largest improvements . The comparison of outpatient and inpatient treatment regarding psychiatric symptoms showed a marginally significant result ( p = 0.057 ) in favour of inpatient treatment . Conclusions : Patients with cluster B personality disorders improved in all investigated treatment setting s , with a trend towards larger improvements of psychiatric symptoms in the inpatient setting compared to the outpatient setting . Specialised inpatient treatment should be considered as a valuable treatment option for cluster B personality disorders , both in research and in clinical practice
The EQ-5D and SF-36 achieved mixed results in the quantitative testing against psychometric criteria .
The qualitative analysis suggests this is because they provide a very limited coverage of themes identified by people with mental health problems .
BACKGROUND Generic preference-based measures of health like the EQ-5D and SF-6D ( ® ) are increasingly being used in economic evaluation and outcome assessment .
However , there are concerns as to whether or not these generic measures are appropriate for use in people with mental health problems .
OBJECTIVES The EQ-5D and SF-36 ( ® ) ( including its derivatives the SF-12 ( ® ) and SF-6D ) were assessed using the psychometric criteria of validity and responsiveness using quantitative and qualitative methods .
Another aim was to estimate mapping functions between the EQ-5D and SF-6D and condition-specific measures , where appropriate .