There is limited evidence to suggest which ablation method was the best .
There is limited evidence to suggest that CA may be a better treatment option compared to medical therapies in the management of persistent AF .
This review was also unable to recommend the best CA method
BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia seen in cardiovascular departments .
Treatments include medical interventions and catheter ablation .
Due to uncertainties in medical therapies for AF , and the need to continue sinus rhythm , ablation has been recently considered as a viable alternative .
Many new ablation methods based on pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) have been developed .
OBJECTIVES The primary objective of this review was to assess the beneficial and harmful effects of  catheter ablation ( CA ) in comparison with medical treatment in patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF .
The secondary objective was to determine the best regimen of CA .
Symptomatic and asymptomatic atrial fibrillation after pulmonary vein ablation and the impact on quality of life.
BACKGROUND The aim of this prospect i ve study was to evaluate the recurrences of atrial fibrillation ( AF ) and flutter ( AFL ) after circumferential pulmonary vein ablation ( CPVA )  using repetitive long-term Holter recordings , and to evaluate the change in quality of life ( QoL ) , especially in patients with asymptomatic AF recurrences . METHODS A total of 149 patients with AF were followed up with 7-day Holter monitoring at 3 , 6 , and 12 months after CPVA .  We calculated the burden of AF/AFL defined as the percentage of time in AF/AFL , and patients with documented arrhythmia were divided into isolated symptomatic episodes of arrhythmia , mixed symptomatic/asymptomatic arrhythmia , or isolated asymptomatic arrhythmia . The QoL was analyzed with SF-36 question naires in patients with sinus rhythm after CPVA , and in patients with recurrence of symptomatic and asymptomatic arrhythmia , respectively . RESULTS Asymptomatic arrhythmia was observed in 44 % of the patients with documented arrhythmia at 12 months of follow-up . In patients with persistent AF , 63 % of the documented arrhythmia at 12 months of follow-up was asymptomatic and often persistent . In the subgroup of patients with asymptomatic arrhythmia , the QoL improved significantly in the physical scores , in contrast to patients with symptomatic arrhythmia who had unchanged or worsened QoL scores . CONCLUSIONS Asymptomatic arrhythmia is very common after AF ablation . Our data indicate that these patients improve their physical component of the QoL significantly , which may be considered a palliative success of treatment . We suggest that patients with asymptomatic AF recurrences are carefully evaluated before considering reablation . Repetitive rhythm monitoring after AF ablation is very important considering the postablation management of anticoagulant therapy
There is limited evidence to suggest which ablation method was the best .
There is limited evidence to suggest that CA may be a better treatment option compared to medical therapies in the management of persistent AF .
This review was also unable to recommend the best CA method
BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia seen in cardiovascular departments .
Treatments include medical interventions and catheter ablation .
Due to uncertainties in medical therapies for AF , and the need to continue sinus rhythm , ablation has been recently considered as a viable alternative .
Many new ablation methods based on pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) have been developed .
OBJECTIVES The primary objective of this review was to assess the beneficial and harmful effects of  catheter ablation ( CA ) in comparison with medical treatment in patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF .
The secondary objective was to determine the best regimen of CA .