This review found limited high- quality evidence to inform the treatment of impetigo .
BACKGROUND Impetigo is a common clinical problem seen in general practice .
Uncertainty exists as to the most effective treatment , or indeed if treatment is necessary .
AIM To determine the most effective treatment for impetigo in a systemically well patient .
Treatment of impetigo and ecthyma. A comparison of sulconazole with miconazole.
In a r and omized , double-blind , parallel comparative study of 80 patients , impetigo and ecthyma were treated effectively by sulconazole nitrate 1 % cream and miconazole nitrate 2 % cream applied to lesions twice daily for 14 days . When treatment began , bacterial cultures from all pyodermal lesions yielded Group A beta-hemolytic streptococci or pathogenic staphylococci . Among the 32 sulconazole-treated impetigo patients , bacterial cultures from 26 ( 69 % ) were negative by treatment day 4 , and those from all 32 ( 100 % ) were negative by treatment day 7 ; among the 34 miconazole-treated impetigo patients , cultures from 17 ( 50 % ) were negative by treatment day 4 , cultures from 32 ( 94.1 % ) were negative by treatment day 7 , and cultures from 29 ( 97 % ) were negative by treatment day 14 . Each treatment promptly relieved the pyodermal signs ( crusts , vesicles , pustules , bullae , and exu date ) . Both agents were considered to be safe and effective medications for treating impetigo and ecthyma
This review found limited high- quality evidence to inform the treatment of impetigo .
BACKGROUND Impetigo is a common clinical problem seen in general practice .
Uncertainty exists as to the most effective treatment , or indeed if treatment is necessary .
AIM To determine the most effective treatment for impetigo in a systemically well patient .