Naftopidil appears to have similar effects in the urological symptom scores and QoL compared to tamsulosin and silodosin .
Naftopidil has similar sexual adverse events compared to tamsulosin but has fewer compared to silodosin
BACKGROUND Benign prostatic hyperplasia ( BPH ) is a common condition in ageing men that may cause lower urinary tract symptoms ( LUTS ) .
Treatment aims are to relieve symptoms and prevent disease-related complications .
Naftopidil is an alpha-blocker ( AB ) that has a high affinity for the A1d receptor that may have advantages in treating LUTS in this setting .
This is an up date of a Cochrane Review first published in 2009 .
Since that time , several large r and omised controlled trials ( RCTs ) have been reported , making this up date relevant .
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effects of naftopidil for the treatment of LUTS associated with BPH .
The long-term effect of doxazosin, finasteride, and combination therapy on the clinical progression of benign prostatic hyperplasia.
BACKGROUND Benign prostatic hyperplasia is commonly treated with alpha-adrenergic-receptor antagonists ( alpha-blockers ) or 5alpha-reductase inhibitors . The long-term effect of these drugs , singly or combined , on the risk of clinical progression is unknown . METHODS We conducted a long-term , double-blind trial ( mean follow-up , 4.5 years ) involving 3047 men to compare the effects of placebo , doxazosin , finasteride , and combination therapy on measures of the clinical progression of benign prostatic hyperplasia . RESULTS The risk of overall clinical progression -- defined as an increase above base line of at least 4 points in the American Urological Association symptom score , acute urinary retention , urinary incontinence , renal insufficiency , or recurrent urinary tract infection -- was significantly reduced by doxazosin ( 39 percent risk reduction , P<0.001 ) and finasteride ( 34 percent risk reduction , P=0.002 ) , as compared with placebo . The reduction in risk associated with combination therapy ( 66 percent for the comparison with placebo , P<0.001 ) was significantly greater than that associated with doxazosin ( P<0.001 ) or finasteride ( P<0.001 ) alone . The risks of acute urinary retention and the need for invasive therapy were significantly reduced by combination therapy ( P<0.001 ) and finasteride ( P<0.001 ) but not by doxazosin . Doxazosin ( P<0.001 ) , finasteride ( P=0.001 ) , and combination therapy ( P<0.001 ) each result ed in significant improvement in symptom scores , with combination therapy being superior to both doxazosin ( P=0.006 ) and finasteride ( P<0.001 ) alone . CONCLUSIONS Long-term combination therapy with doxazosin and finasteride was safe and reduced the risk of overall clinical progression of benign prostatic hyperplasia significantly more than did treatment with either drug alone . Combination therapy and finasteride alone reduced the long-term risk of acute urinary retention and the need for invasive therapy
Naftopidil appears to have similar effects in the urological symptom scores and QoL compared to tamsulosin and silodosin .
Naftopidil has similar sexual adverse events compared to tamsulosin but has fewer compared to silodosin
BACKGROUND Benign prostatic hyperplasia ( BPH ) is a common condition in ageing men that may cause lower urinary tract symptoms ( LUTS ) .
Treatment aims are to relieve symptoms and prevent disease-related complications .
Naftopidil is an alpha-blocker ( AB ) that has a high affinity for the A1d receptor that may have advantages in treating LUTS in this setting .
This is an up date of a Cochrane Review first published in 2009 .
Since that time , several large r and omised controlled trials ( RCTs ) have been reported , making this up date relevant .
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effects of naftopidil for the treatment of LUTS associated with BPH .