D. Restoration of sinus rhythm for monophasic vs. biphasic waveforms .
Another study showed that PVI result ed in long-term restoration
Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is a major public health problem in the United States .
More than 2.3 million Americans are estimated to have AF ( 1 ) .
The known association between AF and substantial mortality , morbidity , and health care costs compounds the effect of this condition .
Not only is the risk for death in patients with AF twice that of patients without it , but AF can result in myocardial ischemia and infa rct ion , exacerbate heart failure ( HF ) , and cause tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy if the ventricular rate is not well-controlled ( 25 ) .
The most dreaded complication of AF is thromboembolism , especially stroke ( 6 ) .
In some patients , AF or therapies to manage this condition can severely depreciate quality of life ( 710 ) .
Furthermore , the management of AF and its complications is responsible for nearly $ 16 billion in additional costs to the U.S. health care system per year ( 11 ) .
We conducted this systematic review to evaluate the comparative safety and effectiveness of rate- versus rhythm-control strategies ;  medications used for ventricular rate control ; strict versus more lenient rate-control strategies ; nonpharmacologic rate-control therapies  versus medications ; electrical cardioversion and antiarrhythmic medications  for restoration of sinus rhythm ;  and  catheter ablation , surgical ablation , and antiarrhythmic medications  for maintenance of sinus rhythm .
Substrate and Trigger Ablation for Reduction of Atrial Fibrillation (STAR AF): a randomized, multicentre, international trial†
Aims This multicentre , r and omized trial compared three strategies of AF ablation : ablation of complex fractionated electrograms ( CFE ) alone , pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) alone , and combined PVI + CFE ablation , using st and ardized automated mapping software . Methods and results Patients with drug-refractory , high-burden paroxysmal ( episodes > 6 h , > 4 in 6 months ) or persistent atrial fibrillation ( AF ) were enrolled at eight centres . Patients ( n = 100 ) were r and omized to one of three arms . For CFE alone ( n = 34 ) , spontaneous/induced AF was mapped using vali date d , automated CFE software and all sites < 120 ms were ablated until AF termination/non-inducibility . For PVI ( n = 32 ) , all four PV antra were isolated and confirmed using a circular catheter . For PVI + CFE ( n = 34 ) , all four PV antra were isolated , followed by AF induction and ablation of all CFE sites until AF termination/non-inducibility . Patients were followed at 3 , 6 , and 12 months with a visit , ECG , 48 h Holter . Atrial fibrillation symptoms were confirmed by loop recording . Repeat procedures were allowed within the first 6 months . The primary endpoint was freedom from AF > 30 s at 1 year . Patients ( age 57 ± 10 years , LA size 42 ± 6 mm ) were 35 % persistent AF . In CFE , ablation terminated AF in 68 % . Only 0.4 PVs per patient were isolated as a result of CFE . In PVI , 94 % had all four PVs successfully isolated . In PVI + CFE , 94 % had all four PVs isolated , 76 % had inducible AF with additional CFE ablation , with 73 % termination of AF . There were significantly more repeat procedures in the CFE arm ( 47 % ) vs. PVI ( 31 % ) or PVI + CFE ( 15 % ) ( P = 0.01 ) . After one procedure , PVI + CFE had a significantly higher freedom from AF ( 74 % ) compared with PVI ( 48 % ) and CFE ( 29 % ) ( P = 0.004 ) . After two procedures , PVI + CFE still had the highest success ( 88 % ) compared with PVI ( 68 % ) and CFE ( 38 % ) ( P = 0.001 ) . Ninety-six percent of these patients were off anti-arrhythmics . Complications were two tamponades , no PV stenosis , and no mortality . Conclusion In high-burden paroxysmal/persistent AF , PVI + CFE has the highest freedom from AF vs. PVI or CFE alone after one or two procedures . Complex fractionated electrogram alone has the lowest one and two procedure success rates with a higher incidence of repeat procedures . Clinical Trials.gov identifier number NCT00367757
D. Restoration of sinus rhythm for monophasic vs. biphasic waveforms .
Another study showed that PVI result ed in long-term restoration
Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is a major public health problem in the United States .
More than 2.3 million Americans are estimated to have AF ( 1 ) .
The known association between AF and substantial mortality , morbidity , and health care costs compounds the effect of this condition .
Not only is the risk for death in patients with AF twice that of patients without it , but AF can result in myocardial ischemia and infa rct ion , exacerbate heart failure ( HF ) , and cause tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy if the ventricular rate is not well-controlled ( 25 ) .
The most dreaded complication of AF is thromboembolism , especially stroke ( 6 ) .
In some patients , AF or therapies to manage this condition can severely depreciate quality of life ( 710 ) .
Furthermore , the management of AF and its complications is responsible for nearly $ 16 billion in additional costs to the U.S. health care system per year ( 11 ) .
We conducted this systematic review to evaluate the comparative safety and effectiveness of rate- versus rhythm-control strategies ;  medications used for ventricular rate control ; strict versus more lenient rate-control strategies ; nonpharmacologic rate-control therapies  versus medications ; electrical cardioversion and antiarrhythmic medications  for restoration of sinus rhythm ;  and  catheter ablation , surgical ablation , and antiarrhythmic medications  for maintenance of sinus rhythm .