PRT had a large positive effect on strength ( 41 trials , 1955 participants ) , but there was statistical heterogeneity that was not explained by differences in study quality , participant characteristics or the exercise program .
REVIEW ER 'S CONCLUSIONS PRT appears to be an effective intervention to increase strength in older people and has a positive effect on some functional limitations .
However , the effect of this intervention on more substantive outcomes such as measures of disability or HRQOL remains unclear .
BACKGROUND Muscle weakness in old age , is associated with physical disability and an increased risk of falls .
Progressive resistance strength ( PRT ) training exercises ( i.e. movements performed against a specific external force that is regularly increased during training ) are design ed to increase strength in older people .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effect of PRT on measures of physical disability , functional limitation and impairment in older people  , and identify adverse events .
Cost-effectiveness of aerobic and resistance exercise in seniors with knee osteoarthritis.
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to determine , in a r and omized clinical trial of 439 individuals with knee osteoarthritis , the incremental cost-effectiveness of aerobic versus weight resistance training , compared with an education control intervention . METHODS Cost estimates of the intervention were based upon the cost of purchasing from the community similar services to provide exercise or health education . Effect at 18 months was measured using several variables , including : self-reported disability score , 6-min walking distance , stair climb , lifting and carrying task , car task , and measures of pain frequency and pain intensity on ambulation and transfer . RESULTS The total cost of the educational intervention was $ 343.98 per participant . The aerobic exercise intervention cost $ 323.55 per participant , and the resistance training intervention cost $ 325.20 per participant . On all but two of the outcome variables , the incremental savings per incremental effect for the resistance exercise group was greater than for the aerobic exercise group . CONCLUSION The data obtained from this study suggest that , compared with an education control , resistance training for seniors with knee osteoarthritis is more economically efficient than aerobic exercise in improving physical function . However , the magnitude of the difference in efficiency between the two approaches is small
PRT had a large positive effect on strength ( 41 trials , 1955 participants ) , but there was statistical heterogeneity that was not explained by differences in study quality , participant characteristics or the exercise program .
REVIEW ER 'S CONCLUSIONS PRT appears to be an effective intervention to increase strength in older people and has a positive effect on some functional limitations .
However , the effect of this intervention on more substantive outcomes such as measures of disability or HRQOL remains unclear .
BACKGROUND Muscle weakness in old age , is associated with physical disability and an increased risk of falls .
Progressive resistance strength ( PRT ) training exercises ( i.e. movements performed against a specific external force that is regularly increased during training ) are design ed to increase strength in older people .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effect of PRT on measures of physical disability , functional limitation and impairment in older people  , and identify adverse events .