There was no evidence that AAC improved frequency of speech , verbal expressive vocabulary or children 's social communication or pragmatic language immediately postintervention .
Overall , neither of the interventions ( PECS or FPI ) result ed in maintained improvements in spoken or non-verbal communication in most children .
AUTHORS ' CONCLUSIONS There is limited evidence that verbally based and ACC interventions improve spoken and non-verbal communication in minimally verbal children with ASD .
In the study that used an AAC intervention , there were significant gains in frequency of PECS use and verbal and non-verbal initiations , but not in expressive vocabulary or social communication immediately postintervention .
In the study that investigated a verbally based intervention , there were no significant gains in expressive language postintervention , but children with lower expressive language at the beginning of the study improved more than those with better expressive language at baseline .
Neither study investigated adverse events , other communication skills , quality of life or behavioural outcomes .
BACKGROUND Autism spectrum disorder ( ASD ) has an estimated prevalence of around 1.7 % of the population .
People with ASD often also have language difficulties , and about 25 % to 30 % of children with ASD either fail to develop functional language or are minimally verbal .
The ability to communicate effectively is an essential life skill , and difficulties with communication can have a range of adverse outcomes , including poorer academic achievement , behavioural difficulties and reduced quality of life .
Historically , most studies have investigated communication interventions for ASD in verbal children .
We can not assume the same interventions will work for minimally verbal children with ASD .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of communication interventions  for ASD in minimally verbal children .
A new social communication intervention for children with autism: pilot randomised controlled treatment study suggesting effectiveness.
BACKGROUND Psychosocial treatments are the mainstay of management of autism in the UK but there is a notable lack of a systematic evidence base for their effectiveness . R and omised controlled trial ( RCT ) studies in this area have been rare but are essential because of the developmental heterogeneity of the disorder . We aim ed to test a new theoretically based social communication intervention targeting parental communication in a r and omised design against routine care alone . METHODS The intervention was given in addition to existing care and involved regular monthly therapist contact for 6 months with a further 6 months of 2-monthly consolidation sessions . It aim ed to educate parents and train them in adapted communication tailored to their child 's individual competencies . Twenty-eight children with autism were r and omised between this treatment and routine care alone , stratified for age and baseline severity . Outcome was measured at 12 months from commencement of intervention , using st and ardised instruments . RESULTS All cases studied met full Autism Diagnostic Interview ( ADI ) criteria for classical autism . Treatment and controls had similar routine care during the study period and there were no study dropouts after treatment had started . The active treatment group showed significant improvement compared with controls on the primary outcome measure -- Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule ( ADOS ) total score , particularly in reciprocal social interaction-- and on secondary measures of expressive language , communicative initiation and parent-child interaction . Suggestive but non-significant results were found in Vinel and Adaptive Behaviour Scales ( Communication Sub-domain ) and ADOS stereotyped and restricted behaviour domain . CONCLUSIONS A R and omised Treatment Trial design of this kind in classical autism is feasible and acceptable to patients . This pilot study suggests significant additional treatment benefits following a targeted ( but relatively non-intensive ) dyadic social communication treatment , when compared with routine care . The study needs replication on larger and independent sample s. It should encourage further RCT design s in this area
There was no evidence that AAC improved frequency of speech , verbal expressive vocabulary or children 's social communication or pragmatic language immediately postintervention .
Overall , neither of the interventions ( PECS or FPI ) result ed in maintained improvements in spoken or non-verbal communication in most children .
AUTHORS ' CONCLUSIONS There is limited evidence that verbally based and ACC interventions improve spoken and non-verbal communication in minimally verbal children with ASD .
In the study that used an AAC intervention , there were significant gains in frequency of PECS use and verbal and non-verbal initiations , but not in expressive vocabulary or social communication immediately postintervention .
In the study that investigated a verbally based intervention , there were no significant gains in expressive language postintervention , but children with lower expressive language at the beginning of the study improved more than those with better expressive language at baseline .
Neither study investigated adverse events , other communication skills , quality of life or behavioural outcomes .
BACKGROUND Autism spectrum disorder ( ASD ) has an estimated prevalence of around 1.7 % of the population .
People with ASD often also have language difficulties , and about 25 % to 30 % of children with ASD either fail to develop functional language or are minimally verbal .
The ability to communicate effectively is an essential life skill , and difficulties with communication can have a range of adverse outcomes , including poorer academic achievement , behavioural difficulties and reduced quality of life .
Historically , most studies have investigated communication interventions for ASD in verbal children .
We can not assume the same interventions will work for minimally verbal children with ASD .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of communication interventions  for ASD in minimally verbal children .