In general , estimates of construct validity were lower when vali date d against dissimilar constructs , except for instruments measuring impairments in mental functions .
CONCLUSION There is a trend that validation against a similar construct yields higher correlation coefficients than validation against a dissimilar construct .
PURPOSE This paper focuses on the construct validity of instruments measuring impairments in body structures and function in rheumatic disorders .
The objective is : 1 ) to make an inventory of constructs , based on the domains of the International Classification of Functioning , Disabilities and Health problems ( ICF ) , against which instruments measuring impairments in body structures and function were vali date d ; 2 ) to analyse whether validation against a similar construct result ed in higher correlation coefficients than validation against a dissimilar construct .
Which outcome measures should be used in rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials? Clinical and quality-of-life measures' responsiveness to treatment in a randomized controlled trial.
OBJECTIVE To determine the discriminant validity of the core set of outcome measures proposed by the American College of Rheumatology ( ACR ) and the Outcome Measures in Clinical Trials ( OMERACT ) conference committee to be used in clinical trials of rheumatoid arthritis ( RA ) . METHODS Utilizing data from a multicenter r and omized double-blind clinical trial of low-dose cyclosporine and placebo in RA , we estimated the relative efficiency ( RE ) of measures to detect a treatment effect ( relative to tender joint count , which was assigned a value of 1 ) . Four pain measures ( 10-cm visual analog scale [ VAS ] , 5-point categorical scale , Health Assessment Question naire [ HAQ ] pain index , Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales [ AIMS ] pain score ) and 3 quality -of-life measures ( Problem Elicitation Technique [ PET ] , HAQ , AIMS )  were compared . RESULTS Physician and patient global measures were the most responsive instruments , although neither was statistically superior to tender joint count . Swollen joint count , grip strength , pain measured on a 10-cm VAS , and functional status as measured by the PET and HAQ were all of intermediate responsiveness . Morning stiffness , 5-point pain scale , and erythrocyte sedimentation rate were the least responsive instruments . CONCLUSION This study provides further evidence to support the core set of outcome measures proposed by the ACR and OMERACT
In general , estimates of construct validity were lower when vali date d against dissimilar constructs , except for instruments measuring impairments in mental functions .
CONCLUSION There is a trend that validation against a similar construct yields higher correlation coefficients than validation against a dissimilar construct .
PURPOSE This paper focuses on the construct validity of instruments measuring impairments in body structures and function in rheumatic disorders .
The objective is : 1 ) to make an inventory of constructs , based on the domains of the International Classification of Functioning , Disabilities and Health problems ( ICF ) , against which instruments measuring impairments in body structures and function were vali date d ; 2 ) to analyse whether validation against a similar construct result ed in higher correlation coefficients than validation against a dissimilar construct .