Conclusions and Relevance In this systematic review and meta- analysis , neither intermittent nor daily dosing with st and ard doses of vitamin D alone was associated with reduced risk of fracture , but daily supplementation with both vitamin D and calcium was a more promising strategy
Importance Vitamin D and calcium supplements are recommended for the prevention of fracture , but previous r and omized clinical trials ( RCTs ) have reported conflicting results , with uncertainty about optimal doses and regimens for supplementation and their overall effectiveness .
Objective To assess the risks of fracture associated with differences in concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D ( 25[OH]D ) in observational studies and the risks of fracture associated with supplementation with vitamin D alone or in combination with calcium in RCTs .
A randomized controlled trial of vitamin D dosing strategies after acute hip fracture: No advantage of loading doses over daily supplementation
Background There remains uncertainty regarding the appropriate therapeutic management of hip fracture patients . The primary aim of our study was to examine whether large loading doses in addition to daily vitamin D offered any advantage over a simple daily low-dose vitamin D regimen for increasing vitamin D levels . Methods In this r and omized controlled study , patients over age 50 with an acute fragility hip fracture were enrolled from two hospital sites in Ontario , Canada . Participants were r and omized to one of three loading dose groups : placebo ; 50,000 IU vitamin D2 ; or 100,000 IU D2 . Following a placebo/loading dose , all patients received a daily tablet of 1,000 IU vitamin D3 for 90 days . Serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D ( 25-OHD ) was measured at baseline , discharge from acute care ( approximately 4-weeks ) , and 3-months . Results Sixty-five patients were enrolled in the study ( 44 % male ) . An immediate rise in 25-OHD occurred in the 100,000 group , however there were no significant differences in 25-OHD between the placebo , 50,000 and 100,000 loading dose groups after 4-weeks ( 69.3 , 84.5 , 75.6 nmol/L , p = 0.15 ) and 3-months ( 86.7 , 84.2 , 73.3 nmol/L , p = 0.09 ) , respectively . At the end of the study , approximately 75 % of the placebo and 50,000 groups had reached the target therapeutic range ( 75 nmol/L ) , and 44 % of the 100,000 group . Conclusions In correcting vitamin D insufficiency/deficiency in elderly patients with hip fracture , our findings suggest that starting with a lower daily dose of Vitamin D3 achieved similar results as providing an additional large loading dose of Vitamin D2 . At the end of the study , all three groups were equally effective in attaining improvement in 25-OHD levels . Given that a daily dose of 1,000 IU vitamin D3 ( with or without a loading dose ) result ed in at least 25 % of patients having suboptimal vitamin D status , patients with acute hip fracture may benefit from a higher daily dose of vitamin D.Trial registration Clinical Trials #
Conclusions and Relevance In this systematic review and meta- analysis , neither intermittent nor daily dosing with st and ard doses of vitamin D alone was associated with reduced risk of fracture , but daily supplementation with both vitamin D and calcium was a more promising strategy
Importance Vitamin D and calcium supplements are recommended for the prevention of fracture , but previous r and omized clinical trials ( RCTs ) have reported conflicting results , with uncertainty about optimal doses and regimens for supplementation and their overall effectiveness .
Objective To assess the risks of fracture associated with differences in concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D ( 25[OH]D ) in observational studies and the risks of fracture associated with supplementation with vitamin D alone or in combination with calcium in RCTs .