D. Restoration of sinus rhythm for monophasic vs. biphasic waveforms .
Another study showed that PVI result ed in long-term restoration
Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is a major public health problem in the United States .
More than 2.3 million Americans are estimated to have AF ( 1 ) .
The known association between AF and substantial mortality , morbidity , and health care costs compounds the effect of this condition .
Not only is the risk for death in patients with AF twice that of patients without it , but AF can result in myocardial ischemia and infa rct ion , exacerbate heart failure ( HF ) , and cause tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy if the ventricular rate is not well-controlled ( 25 ) .
The most dreaded complication of AF is thromboembolism , especially stroke ( 6 ) .
In some patients , AF or therapies to manage this condition can severely depreciate quality of life ( 710 ) .
Furthermore , the management of AF and its complications is responsible for nearly $ 16 billion in additional costs to the U.S. health care system per year ( 11 ) .
We conducted this systematic review to evaluate the comparative safety and effectiveness of rate- versus rhythm-control strategies ;  medications used for ventricular rate control ; strict versus more lenient rate-control strategies ; nonpharmacologic rate-control therapies  versus medications ; electrical cardioversion and antiarrhythmic medications  for restoration of sinus rhythm ;  and  catheter ablation , surgical ablation , and antiarrhythmic medications  for maintenance of sinus rhythm .
Mitral valve surgery plus concomitant atrial fibrillation ablation is superior to mitral valve surgery alone with an intensive rhythm control strategy.
OBJECTIVE Prospect i ve r and omised study comparing patients with atrial fibrillation ( AF ) of more than 6 months duration after mitral valve surgery plus biatrial modified radiofrequency Maze procedure using Medtronic Cardioblate System ( Cardioblate group , n=24 ) vs mitral valve surgery plus intensive rhythm control strategy ( control group , n=25 ) . METHODS Patients were blinded to r and omisation . Preoperatively , at discharge , and at 3-month and 1-year follow-up ,  echocardiography , quality of life assessment s and ECGs  were done . In both groups , sinus rhythm ( SR ) restoration was attempted by intra- and postoperative DC cardioversion and class III antiarrhythmic medication . All patients received warfarin . Amiodarone and warfarin was considered for discontinuation after 3 months in SR , 24-h Holter or event monitor excluding AF . RESULTS Both groups underwent mitral valve replacement or repair ( Cardioblate vs control : 16:8 vs 10:15 ) , had similar gender ( male : 33 % vs 56 % ) , age ( 66+/-8 years vs 68+/-9 years ) , additional aortic valve replacement ( 7 vs 6 patients ) , tricuspid annuloplasty ( 13 vs 13 patients ) , and CABG ( 10 vs 16 patients ) . There was 0 % operative mortality , 0 % postoperative cerebrovascular accidents , but 2 late deaths in the control group . At discharge , 3- and 12-month follow-up , more patients in the Cardioblate group returned to normal SR compared to control ( 29 % , 57 % and 75 % vs 20 % , 43 % and 39 % ; p=0.030 ) . Return of functional atrial contraction in patients in SR at 1 year was comparable between groups ( 63 % vs 89 % , NS ) , and more likely in non-rheumatic pathology and preoperative AF of shorter duration . The effectiveness of atrial contraction was 36+/-14 % vs 43+/-18 % of transmitral flow and there was no difference between groups .  Amiodarone treatment decreased more in Cardioblate group over time ( 92 % , 55 % and 29 % vs 52 % , 52 % and 21 % ; p=0.003 ) , whereas warfarin decrease was comparable ( 100 % , 100 % and 71 % vs 100 % , 95 % and 82 % ; NS ) . CONCLUSIONS Radiofrequency Maze ablation additional to mitral valve surgery result ed in a higher SR conversion rate ( 75 % ) , despite control group treatment with intensive rhythm control strategy having a higher SR conversion rate ( 39 % ) compared to literature ( approximately 25 % ) . Maze ablation result ed in normalisation of atrial function in 63 % of patients converted to SR
D. Restoration of sinus rhythm for monophasic vs. biphasic waveforms .
Another study showed that PVI result ed in long-term restoration
Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is a major public health problem in the United States .
More than 2.3 million Americans are estimated to have AF ( 1 ) .
The known association between AF and substantial mortality , morbidity , and health care costs compounds the effect of this condition .
Not only is the risk for death in patients with AF twice that of patients without it , but AF can result in myocardial ischemia and infa rct ion , exacerbate heart failure ( HF ) , and cause tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy if the ventricular rate is not well-controlled ( 25 ) .
The most dreaded complication of AF is thromboembolism , especially stroke ( 6 ) .
In some patients , AF or therapies to manage this condition can severely depreciate quality of life ( 710 ) .
Furthermore , the management of AF and its complications is responsible for nearly $ 16 billion in additional costs to the U.S. health care system per year ( 11 ) .
We conducted this systematic review to evaluate the comparative safety and effectiveness of rate- versus rhythm-control strategies ;  medications used for ventricular rate control ; strict versus more lenient rate-control strategies ; nonpharmacologic rate-control therapies  versus medications ; electrical cardioversion and antiarrhythmic medications  for restoration of sinus rhythm ;  and  catheter ablation , surgical ablation , and antiarrhythmic medications  for maintenance of sinus rhythm .