Moreover all the anti-arrhythmic agents that are used in treatment of AF were potentially pro-arrhythmic especially in patients with coronary artery disease and structurally abnormal heart .
Although atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is the most common sustained arrhythmia seen during daily cardiovascular physician practice , its management remained a challenge for cardiology physician as there was no single anti-arrhythmic agents proved to be effective in converting atrial fibrillation and kept its effectiveness in maintaining sinus rhythm over long term .
Some of these drugs also have serious non cardiac side effects that limit its long term use in the management of atrial fibrillation .
Several new and investigational anti-arrhythmic agents are emerging but data supporting their effectiveness and safety are still limited .
Conversion efficacy of intravenous ibutilide compared with intravenous amiodarone in patients with recent-onset atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter.
AIM The aim of our study was to compare the efficacy and safety of ibutilide and amiodarone ( intravenously ) in converting  recent-onset atrial fibrillation ( AF ) and atrial flutter ( Af )  to sinus rhythm ( SR ) . METHODS The study was prospect i ve , r and omized and included 152 ( 103 men and 49 women ) consecutive patients with AF or Af of 3 - 48 h duration .  Ibutilide is a selective class III antiarrhythmic agent which when administered intravenously can terminate AF and Af .  Amiodarone is also a class III antiarrhythmic agent that when given intravenously or orally has proved to be more effective than other agents in terminating AF and Af [ B.N. Singh , F.V. Mody , B. Lopez , J.S. Sarma . Antiarrhythmic agents for atrial fibrillation : focus on prolonging atrial repolarization . Am J Cardiol 1999 Nov 4 ; 84 : 161R-173R . ] . Seventy-nine patients ( 56 with AF and 23 with Af ) that consisted group A were treated with ibutilide .  Seventy-three ( 52 with AF and 21 with Af ) consisted group B and were treated with intravenous infusion of amiodarone . RESULTS The conversion rate of group A ( ibutilide ) was significantly higher than the conversion rate of group B ( amiodarone ) ( 80 % vs. 57 % , p=0.0054 ) . As regards the kind of arrhythmia separately , for AF there was n't significant difference ( 77 % vs. 69 % , p = ns ) whereas for Af ibutilide was superior to amiodarone ( 87 % vs. 29 % , p=0.003 ) . The conversion rates of ibutilide did n't differ for AF and Af ( 77 % vs. 87 % , p = ns ) . CONCLUSIONS Ibutilide is more effective than amiodarone in converting recent-onset Af to SR whereas both drugs are equally effective in converting recent-onset AF to SR
Moreover all the anti-arrhythmic agents that are used in treatment of AF were potentially pro-arrhythmic especially in patients with coronary artery disease and structurally abnormal heart .
Although atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is the most common sustained arrhythmia seen during daily cardiovascular physician practice , its management remained a challenge for cardiology physician as there was no single anti-arrhythmic agents proved to be effective in converting atrial fibrillation and kept its effectiveness in maintaining sinus rhythm over long term .
Some of these drugs also have serious non cardiac side effects that limit its long term use in the management of atrial fibrillation .
Several new and investigational anti-arrhythmic agents are emerging but data supporting their effectiveness and safety are still limited .