Thus , WIs were seldom design ed to improve return-to-work .
Overall , there was low quality evidence that showed no significant differences between WIs and no intervention for pain prevalence or severity .
If present , significant results in favour of WIs were not sustained across follow-up times .
Overall , this review found low quality evidence that neither supported nor refuted the benefits of any specific WI for pain relief and moderate quality evidence that a multiple-component intervention reduced sickness absence in the intermediate-term , which was not sustained over time .
BACKGROUND Musculoskeletal disorders are the most common cause of disability in many industrial countries .
Recurrent and chronic pain accounts for a substantial portion of workers ' absenteeism .
Neck pain seems to be more prominent in the general population than previously known .
OBJECTIVES To determine the effectiveness of workplace interventions ( WIs ) in adult workers with neck pain .
A randomised controlled trial on whether a participatory ergonomics intervention could prevent musculoskeletal disorders
Objectives : To examine the efficacy of a participatory ergonomics intervention in preventing musculoskeletal disorders among kitchen workers .  Participatory ergonomics is commonly recommended to reduce musculoskeletal disorders , but evidence for its effectiveness is sparse . Methods : A cluster r and omised controlled trial among the 504 workers of 119 kitchens in Finl and was conducted during 2002–2005 . Kitchens were r and omised to an intervention ( n = 59 ) and control ( n = 60 ) group . The duration of the intervention that guided the workers to identify strenuous work tasks and to seek solutions for decreasing physical and mental workload , was 11 to 14 months . In total , 402 ergonomic changes were implemented . The main outcome measures were the occurrence of and trouble caused by musculoskeletal pain in seven anatomical sites , local fatigue after work , and sick leave due to musculoskeletal disorders . Individual level data were collected by a question naire at baseline and every 3 months during the intervention and 1-year follow-up period . All response rates exceeded 92 % . Results : No systematic differences in any outcome variable were found between the intervention and control groups during the intervention or during the 1-year follow-up . Conclusions : The intervention did not reduce perceived physical work load and no evidence was found for the efficacy of the intervention in preventing musculoskeletal disorders among kitchen workers . It may be that a more comprehensive re design of work organisation and processes is needed , taking more account of workers ’ physical and mental re sources
Thus , WIs were seldom design ed to improve return-to-work .
Overall , there was low quality evidence that showed no significant differences between WIs and no intervention for pain prevalence or severity .
If present , significant results in favour of WIs were not sustained across follow-up times .
Overall , this review found low quality evidence that neither supported nor refuted the benefits of any specific WI for pain relief and moderate quality evidence that a multiple-component intervention reduced sickness absence in the intermediate-term , which was not sustained over time .
BACKGROUND Musculoskeletal disorders are the most common cause of disability in many industrial countries .
Recurrent and chronic pain accounts for a substantial portion of workers ' absenteeism .
Neck pain seems to be more prominent in the general population than previously known .
OBJECTIVES To determine the effectiveness of workplace interventions ( WIs ) in adult workers with neck pain .