The articles were grouped into four main categories : decision aids and outcome predictors , electrical cardioversion-based protocol s , antiarrhythmic-based protocol s , and general management protocol s. Conclusion This systematic review is the first study to our knowledge to evaluate the optimal management of symptomatic AF/AFLin  the ED with a direct impact on ED disposition .
There are several viable management strategies that can result in safe discharge from the ED in the right patient population , and decision aids can be utilized to guide selection of appropriate patients for discharge
Introduction Management of  atrial fibrillation ( AF ) and atrial flutter ( AFL )  in the emergency department ( ED ) varies greatly , and there are currently no United States guidelines to guide management with regard to patient disposition after ED treatment .
The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the literature for decision aids to guide disposition of patients with AF/AFLin the ED , and assess potential outcomes associated with different management strategies in the ED .
Performance of an expedited rhythm control method for recent onset atrial fibrillation in a community hospital.
BACKGROUND A st and ard approach to recent onset atrial fibrillation ( AF ) in the emergency department ( ED ) in the United States has not been established . PURPOSE The purpose of this prospect i ve clinical trial was to determine how an ED protocol emphasizing rhythm control for recent onset AF compared similar patients receiving  st and ard therapy  in the same facility . METHODS We enrolled consecutive patients presenting to our community hospital with recent onset AF into a protocol , which called for rhythm control with procainamide and if unsuccessful electrical cardioversion and discharge home . We compared this prospect i ve cohort with matched historical controls . Primary outcome was admission rate . We also compared ED conversion rates and lengths of stay ( LOS ) . We reported 30-day data on the study group including ED recidivism , recurrent AF , outpatient follow-up , and any important adverse events . RESULTS Fifty-four patients were enrolled in the study group with 4 being admitted compared with 30 of 50 in the historical control group . Ninety-four percent of the study group converted compared with 28 % in the historical control . Both hospital and ED LOS were significantly shorter for the study group . Six patients had recurrent AF , and 4 of those returned to the ED . CONCLUSION An ED protocol that uses rhythm control decreased hospital admission and LOS , and there were no adverse events at 30 days
The articles were grouped into four main categories : decision aids and outcome predictors , electrical cardioversion-based protocol s , antiarrhythmic-based protocol s , and general management protocol s. Conclusion This systematic review is the first study to our knowledge to evaluate the optimal management of symptomatic AF/AFLin  the ED with a direct impact on ED disposition .
There are several viable management strategies that can result in safe discharge from the ED in the right patient population , and decision aids can be utilized to guide selection of appropriate patients for discharge
Introduction Management of  atrial fibrillation ( AF ) and atrial flutter ( AFL )  in the emergency department ( ED ) varies greatly , and there are currently no United States guidelines to guide management with regard to patient disposition after ED treatment .
The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the literature for decision aids to guide disposition of patients with AF/AFLin the ED , and assess potential outcomes associated with different management strategies in the ED .