Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
Effectiveness of water physical therapy on pain, pressure pain sensitivity, and myofascial trigger points in breast cancer survivors: a randomized, controlled clinical trial.
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effects of an 8-week water physical therapy program on cervical and shoulder pain , pressure sensitivity , and the presence of trigger points ( TrPs ) in breast cancer survivors . DESIGN R and omized , controlled trial . SETTING To date , no study has investigated effects of water therapy in breast cancer . PATIENTS Sixty-six breast cancer survivors were r and omly assigned into two groups : WATER group , who received a water exercise program or CONTROL group who received the usual care treatment for breast cancer . INTERVENTIONS The WATER therapy program consisted of 24 sessions ( 3 times/week over 8 weeks ) of low-intensity exercises in a warm pool ( 32 ° C ) . Each session included 10-minute warm-up period ; 35 minutes of aerobic , low-intensity endurance , and core stability training ; and a 15-minute cool-down period ( stretching and relaxation ) .  OUTCOMES Neck and shoulder pain ( visual analog scale , 0 - 100 mm ) , pressure pain thresholds ( PPTs ) over C5-C6 zygapophyseal joints , deltoid muscles , second metacarpal , and tibialis anterior muscles , and the presence of TrPs in cervical-shoulder muscles were assessed at baseline and after the 8-week program by an assessor blinded to treatment allocation . RESULTS The WATER group demonstrated a between-group improvement for neck pain of -31 mm ( 95 % confidence interval [CI]-49 to -22 , P < 0.001 ; effect size 1.1 , 0.81 - 1.75 ) and for shoulder-axillary of -19 mm ( -40 to -04 , P = 0.046 ; effect size 0.70 , 0.14 - 1.40 ) . Improvements were also noted for PPT levels over C5-C6 joints ( between-group differences , affected side : 27.7 kPa , 95 % CI 3.9 - 50.4 ; unaffected : 18.1 kPa , 95 % CI 6.1 - 52.2 ) . No between-group differences for PPT over the remaining points were observed ( P > 0.05 ) . Finally , patients in the WATER program showed a greater reduction of active TrPs as compared with the CONTROL group ( P < 0.05 ) . CONCLUSIONS An 8-week water therapy program was effective for improving neck and shoulder/axillary pain , and reducing the presence of TrPs in breast cancer survivors as compared with usual care ; however , no significant changes in widespread pressure pain hyperalgesia were found
Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?