This systematic review found robust data demonstrating that engagement in diabetes self-management education results in a statistically significant decrease in A1C levels .
PRACTICE IMPLICATION S The data suggest mode of delivery , hours of engagement , and baseline A1C can affect the likelihood of achieving statistically significant and clinical ly meaningful improvement in A1C
OBJECTIVE Assess effect of diabetes self-management education and support methods , providers , duration , and contact time on glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes .
Randomized controlled trial of clinical pharmacy management of patients with type 2 diabetes in an outpatient diabetes clinic in Jordan.
BACKGROUND Glycemic goals ( hemoglobin A1c < 7 % ) are often not achieved in patients with type 2 diabetes despite the availability of many effective treatments and the documented benefits of glycemic control in the reduction of long-term microvascular and macrovascular complications . Several studies have established the important positive effects of pharmacist-led management on achieving glycemic control and other clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes . Diabetes prevalence and mortality are increasing rapidly in Jordan . Nevertheless , clinical pharmacists in Jordan do not typically provide pharmaceutical care ; instead , the principal responsibilities of pharmacists in Jordan are dispensing and marketing of medical products to physicians . OBJECTIVE To assess the primary clinical outcome of glycemic control ( A1c ) and secondary outcomes , including blood pressure , lipid values , self-reported medication adherence , and self-care activities for patients with type 2 diabetes in an outpatient diabetes clinic r and omly assigned to either usual care or a pharmacist-led pharmaceutical care intervention program . METHODS Patients with type 2 diabetes attending an outpatient diabetes clinic of a large teaching hospital were recruited over a 4-month period from January through April 2011 and r and omly assigned to intervention and usual care groups using the Minim software technique . The intervention group at baseline received face-to-face objective -directed education from a clinical pharmacist about type 2 diabetes , prescription medications , and necessary lifestyle changes , followed by 8 weekly telephone follow-up calls to discuss and review the prescribed treatment plan and to resolve any patient concerns . The primary outcome measure was glycemic control ( A1c ) , and secondary measures included systolic and diastolic blood pressure , complete lipid profile ( i.e. , total cholesterol , low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [ LDL-C ] , high-density lipoprotein cholesterol [ HDL-C ] , serum triglycerides ) , and self-reported medication adherence ( 4-item Morisky Scale ) and self-care activities ( Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities question naire ) . Data were collected at baseline and at 6 months follow-up . Changes from baseline to follow-up were calculated for biomarker values , and between-group differences in the change amounts were tested using the t test for independent sample s. A P value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant . RESULTS A total of 77 of 85 patients ( 90.6 % ) r and omly assigned to the intervention group and 79 of 86 patients ( 91.9 % ) assigned to usual care had baseline and 6-month follow-up values . Compared with baseline values , patients in the intervention group had a mean reduction of 0.8 % in A1c versus a mean increase of 0.1 % from baseline in the usual care group ( P = 0.019 ) . The intervention group compared with the usual care group had small but statistically significant improvements in the secondary measures of fasting blood glucose , systolic and diastolic blood pressure , total cholesterol , LDL-C , serum triglycerides , self-reported medication adherence , and self-care activities . Between-group differences in changes in the secondary measures of HDL-C and body mass index were not significant . CONCLUSIONS Patients with type 2 diabetes who received pharmacist-led pharmaceutical care in an outpatient diabetes clinic experienced reduction in A1c at 6 months compared with essentially no change in the usual care group . Six of 8 secondary biomarkers were improved in the intervention group compared with usual care
This systematic review found robust data demonstrating that engagement in diabetes self-management education results in a statistically significant decrease in A1C levels .
PRACTICE IMPLICATION S The data suggest mode of delivery , hours of engagement , and baseline A1C can affect the likelihood of achieving statistically significant and clinical ly meaningful improvement in A1C
OBJECTIVE Assess effect of diabetes self-management education and support methods , providers , duration , and contact time on glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes .