After 18 - 24 months , in terms of treatment failure , the odds ratio for calcium hydroxide vs. formocresol was 1.94 [ 95 % credible interval ( CI ) : 1.11 , 3.25 ] ; 3.38 ( 95 % CI : 1.37 , 8.61 ) for lasers vs. formocresol ; 2.16 ( 95 % CI : 1.12 , 4.31 ) for calcium hydroxide vs. ferric sulfate ; 3.73 ( 95 % CI : 1.27 , 11.67 ) for lasers vs. ferric sulfate ; 0.47 ( 95 % CI : 0.26 , 0.83 ) for MTA vs. calcium hydroxide ; 3.76 ( 95 % CI : 1.39 , 10.08 ) for lasers vs. MTA CONCLUSIONS After 18 - 24 months , formocresol , ferric sulfate , and MTA showed significantly better clinical and radiographic outcomes than calcium hydroxide and laser therapies in primary molar pulpotomies .
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE The network meta-analyses showed that MTA is the first choice for primary molar pulpotomies .
However , if treatment cost is an issue , especially when the treated primary molars are going to be replaced by permanent teeth , ferric sulfate may be the choice
OBJECTIVE Pulpotomy is a common procedure to treat asymptomatic reversible pulpitis in primary molars .
The aim of this study is to undertake a systematic review and a network meta- analysis to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of different pulpotomy procedures in primary molars .
Clinical and radiographic comparison of primary molars after formocresol and electrosurgical pulpotomy: a randomized clinical trial.
BACKGROUND Vital pulpotomy is a single-stage procedure defined as the surgical amputation of the coronal portion of exposed vital pulp , usually as a means of preserving the vitality and function of the remaining radicular portion . OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographic success rates for electrosurgical vs formocresol pulpotomy in human primary molar teeth . SETTING S AND DESIGN This was a prospect i ve , r and omized clinical trial . MATERIAL S AND METHODS In this r and omized clinical trial , pulpotomies were performed on 70 primary molars in children aged 5 - 10 years . The teeth were treated using either a conventional formocresol ( 35 teeth ) or electrosurgical technique ( 35 teeth ) . Following the pulpotomy procedure , the teeth were evaluated for clinical and radiographic success for three , six and nine months . The teeth were evaluated for the presence of pain , abscess , fistula , mobility , internal and external resorption , and radiolucency . STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The data were assessed with Fishers ' Exact test . RESULTS After nine months of follow-up , the clinical and radiographic success rates were 96 and 84 % respectively in the electrosurgical group and 100 and 96.8 % respectively in the formocresol group . There was no statistically significant difference between the success rates in the two groups ( P > 0.05 ) . CONCLUSIONS Our results showed the failure rates for electrosurgical pulpotomy to be equal to those for formocresol pulpotomy . Although electrosurgical pulpotomy is a nonpharmacological technique giving favorable results , it is still a preservative technique . Further studies using larger sample s and longer evaluation periods are recommended
After 18 - 24 months , in terms of treatment failure , the odds ratio for calcium hydroxide vs. formocresol was 1.94 [ 95 % credible interval ( CI ) : 1.11 , 3.25 ] ; 3.38 ( 95 % CI : 1.37 , 8.61 ) for lasers vs. formocresol ; 2.16 ( 95 % CI : 1.12 , 4.31 ) for calcium hydroxide vs. ferric sulfate ; 3.73 ( 95 % CI : 1.27 , 11.67 ) for lasers vs. ferric sulfate ; 0.47 ( 95 % CI : 0.26 , 0.83 ) for MTA vs. calcium hydroxide ; 3.76 ( 95 % CI : 1.39 , 10.08 ) for lasers vs. MTA CONCLUSIONS After 18 - 24 months , formocresol , ferric sulfate , and MTA showed significantly better clinical and radiographic outcomes than calcium hydroxide and laser therapies in primary molar pulpotomies .
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE The network meta-analyses showed that MTA is the first choice for primary molar pulpotomies .
However , if treatment cost is an issue , especially when the treated primary molars are going to be replaced by permanent teeth , ferric sulfate may be the choice
OBJECTIVE Pulpotomy is a common procedure to treat asymptomatic reversible pulpitis in primary molars .
The aim of this study is to undertake a systematic review and a network meta- analysis to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of different pulpotomy procedures in primary molars .