Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
Upper limb progressive resistance training and stretching exercises following surgery for early breast cancer: a randomized controlled trial
The aim of this study was to determine whether an exercise program , commencing 4–6 weeks post-operatively , reduces upper limb impairments in women treated for early breast cancer . Women ( n = 160 ) were r and omized to either an 8-week exercise program ( n = 81 ) or to a control group ( n = 79 ) following stratification for axillary surgery . The exercise program comprised a weekly session and home program of passive stretching and progressive resistance training for shoulder muscles . The control group attended fortnightly assessment s but no exercises were provided . The primary outcome was self-reported arm symptoms derived from the EORTC breast cancer-specific question naire ( BR23 ) , scored out of 100 with a low score indicative of fewer symptoms . The secondary outcomes included physical measures of shoulder range of motion , strength , and swelling ( i.e. , lymphedema ) . Women were assessed immediately following the intervention and at 6 months post-intervention . The change in symptoms from baseline was not significantly different between groups immediately following the intervention or at 6 m post-intervention . The between group difference immediately following the intervention was 4 ( 95 % CI −1 to 9 ) and 6 months post-intervention was 4 ( −2 to 10 ) . However , the change in range of motion for flexion and abduction was significantly greater in the exercise group immediately following the intervention , as was change in shoulder abductor strength . In conclusion , a supervised exercise program provided some , albeit small , additional benefit at 6 months post-intervention to women who had been provided with written information and reminders to use their arm . Both the groups reported few impairments including swelling immediately following the intervention and 6 months post-intervention . Notably , resistance training in the post-operative period did not precipitate lymphedema
Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?