There was no major difference in the rate of complications .
Conclusions Short-term recovery favors limited incision over st and ard incision THA .
Background The literature comparing  limited incision and st and ard incision THAs  is confusing regarding whether limited incision THA improves short-term recovery without compromising long-term durability and survival .
Further , previously published meta-analyses can not conclude that limited incision THA is better .
With new data , we seek to discover if the answers now exist .
Purpose We used meta- analysis to compare surgical and hospitalization data , clinical outcomes , and complication rates , and thus ( 1 ) confirm whether limited incision THA is at least comparable to st and ard incision THA ; and ( 2 ) determine whether limited incision THA is an improvement over st and ard incision THA .
Minimal-invasive posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty versus standard lateral approach.
In this prospect i ve study we compared clinical and radiological results and rehabilitation progress of 64 patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty using the st and ard lateral approach with 64 patients operated with a minimal-invasive ( MIS ) posterior approach .  The outcome of our study did not show any significant differences with regard to patient 's safety such as complication rate and radiological assessment of the cup position . There was no difference in the duration of surgery , blood loss , hospital stay and postoperative leg length discrepancy . Rehabilitation milestones were achieved earlier by MIS patients and three and six months postoperatively , the Harris Hip Score of the MIS group was significantly higher
There was no major difference in the rate of complications .
Conclusions Short-term recovery favors limited incision over st and ard incision THA .
Background The literature comparing  limited incision and st and ard incision THAs  is confusing regarding whether limited incision THA improves short-term recovery without compromising long-term durability and survival .
Further , previously published meta-analyses can not conclude that limited incision THA is better .
With new data , we seek to discover if the answers now exist .
Purpose We used meta- analysis to compare surgical and hospitalization data , clinical outcomes , and complication rates , and thus ( 1 ) confirm whether limited incision THA is at least comparable to st and ard incision THA ; and ( 2 ) determine whether limited incision THA is an improvement over st and ard incision THA .