Our primary outcome was the measure ’s minimal important difference ( MID ) .
Conclusions In this focused evidence review , the most evidence on key psychometric properties in chronic musculoskeletal pain population s was found for the ODI , RMDQ , SF-36 BPS , NRS , and VAS .
Background Developing successful interventions for chronic musculoskeletal pain requires valid , responsive , and reliable outcome measures .
The Minneapolis VA Evidence -based Synthesis Program completed a focused evidence review on key psychometric properties of 17 self-report measures of pain severity and pain-related functional impairment suitable for clinical research on chronic musculoskeletal pain .
Reliability and Validity of 6 Measures of Pain, Function, and Disability for Ankle Arthroplasty and Arthrodesis
Background : Patient-reported outcome measures are increasingly used evaluating clinical care . Many measures used to assess operative hindfoot interventions vary in content , and some have not been psychometrically vali date d in this population . The purpose of this study was to compare measurement properties of  6 lower-extremity patient-reported outcome measures  , and to evaluate their reliability and validity in light of patients ’ preferences . Methods : Cross-sectional survey of 42 preoperative and 100 postoperative patients completed 6 lower-extremity outcome measures  on 2 occasions : Foot Function Index ( FFI ) , Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale ( AOS ) , patient-reported items of the  American  Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society Question naire ( AOFAS ) , Lower Extremity Functional Scale ( LEFS ) , Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index ( WOMAC ) , and the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment ( SMFA ) , as well as measures of preference , and symptoms . Results : Internal consistency was good to excellent for all scales and subscales ( α = .84-.97 ; ICC [ 2,1 ] = .81-.96 ) . Correlations between scales ranged from .50 ( WOMACStiffness and FFIActivity Limitations ) to .92 ( LEFS and SMFAOverall , WOMACPain and AOSOverall , FFIOverall and AOFASOverall ) . Higher correlations occurred within instruments ( r = .97 AOSPain and AOSOverall ) and between similar subscales from different instruments ( r = .91 WOMACPain and AOSPain ) . Construct validity showed moderate to high correlations to global ratings of Pain , Stiffness , and difficulty performing Daily Activities . The highest correlations ( r > .75 ) occurred between Pain and AOSOverall ( r = .84 ) , stiffness and WOMACStiffness ( r = .81 ) , and Daily Activities and AOSDisability ( r = .87 ) . Patients rated instruments by preference . FFI , WOMAC , LEFS , and SMFA rated favorably for length . FFI , WOMAC , LEFS , and AOFAS rated high for underst and ability . FFI was rated by postoperative patients as most likely to capture change due to surgery . SMFA rated the best overall . Conclusions : Direct comparison of instruments revealed similarity between scales in construct validity and reliability . Patient preferences supported the use of these scales . Foot-specific instruments offered no clear advantage over lower-extremity instruments . Level of Evidence : Level II , prospect i ve comparative study
Our primary outcome was the measure ’s minimal important difference ( MID ) .
Conclusions In this focused evidence review , the most evidence on key psychometric properties in chronic musculoskeletal pain population s was found for the ODI , RMDQ , SF-36 BPS , NRS , and VAS .
Background Developing successful interventions for chronic musculoskeletal pain requires valid , responsive , and reliable outcome measures .
The Minneapolis VA Evidence -based Synthesis Program completed a focused evidence review on key psychometric properties of 17 self-report measures of pain severity and pain-related functional impairment suitable for clinical research on chronic musculoskeletal pain .