Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
Efficacy of a multiprofessional rehabilitation programme in radical cystectomy pathways: A prospective randomized controlled trial
Abstract Introduction . Radical cystectomy with lymph-node dissection is a complex procedure and often followed by high postoperative morbidity and physical impairments leading to prolonged length of stay ( LOS ) . Fast-track principles are st and ard procedure in radical cystectomy . Additional preoperative and postoperative physical exercises and enhanced mobilization may reduce LOS and early complications . Material s and methods . In total , 107 patients were included in a prospect i ve r and omized controlled design , 50 in the intervention group ( nI = 50 ) and 57 in the st and ard group ( ns = 57 ) . The st and ard regimen comprised regular fast-track principles . The intervention included st and ardized preoperative and postoperative strength and endurance exercises and progressive postoperative mobilization . The programme was initiated 2 weeks before surgery . Efficacy was expressed as a reduction in postoperative LOS . Early complications were defined as events occurring at most 90 days postoperatively and grade d using the Clavien – Dindo classification system . Results . Adherence to prehabilitation , i.e. patients who accomplished at least 75 % of the programme , was 59 % . Postoperative mobilization was significantly improved by walking distance ( p ≤ 0.001 ) . The ability to perform personal activities of daily living was improved by 1 day ( p ≤ 0.05 ) . The median LOS was 8 days in both treatment groups ( p = 0.68 ) . There was no significant difference between treatment groups in severity of complications ( p = 0.64 ) . Conclusions . There was no reduction in LOS due to the preoperative and postoperative rehabilitation programme , although enhanced mobilization was achieved . The optimized minimal surgical procedure may have affected the ability to reduce LOS further with available techniques and procedures . Alternative parameters for recovery may offer more precise and relevant information
Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?