High-intensity interval training ( HIT ) with duration of 2 to 6 weeks seems to be the best exercise programme in a prehabilitation intervention but it exists heterogeneity in terms of intensity and duration .
Prehabilitation increase exercise capacity and significantly enhances pulmonary function .
But the reduction of postoperative complication and mortality has not been clearly demonstrated .
It seems that not all patients can benefit from prehabilitation and it could be indicated only in patients with impaired lung function .
Meanwhile , safety of prehabilitation and good results of some studies support this intervention in high-risk patients
Surgical resection remains the best treatment option for patients with early stage of non-small cell lung cancer ( NSCLC ) .
However , it may be responsible of postoperative complication and mortality , especially in patients with impaired pulmonary function .
Enhanced recovery after surgery ( ERAS ) programs have been focused mainly in minimal invasive surgery approach during lung resection and respiratory rehabilitation after surgery .
Preoperative exercise-based intervention ( prehabilitation ) has demonstrated reduction of morbi-mortality in other surgeries but in thoracic surgery continues to be under discussion .
Cardio-pulmonary exercise test ( CPET ) is the gold st and ard technique to predict postoperative morbi-mortality .
The implementation of a preoperative respiratory rehabilitation could optimize patient 's physical capacity before surgery and improve outcomes and enhance recovery .
The aim of this systematic review of the literature is to identify the effectiveness and safety of prehabilitation programs in thoracic surgery , the type of exercise and its duration , and the group of patients with best benefit .
Prehabilitation is a safe intervention without side effects in patients .
Preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation before lung cancer resection: results from two randomized studies.
Complete surgical resection is the most effective curative treatment for lung cancer . However , many patients with lung cancer also have severe COPD which increases their risk of postoperative complications and their likelihood of being considered " inoperable . " Preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation ( PR ) has been proposed as an intervention to decrease surgical morbidity but there is no established protocol and no r and omized study has been published to date . We tested two preoperative PR interventions in patients undergoing lung cancer resection and with moderate-severe COPD in a r and omized single blinded design . Outcomes were length of hospital stay and postoperative complications . The first study tested 4 weeks of guideline -based PR vs. usual care : that study proved to be very difficult to recruit as patients and providers were reluctant to delay surgery . Nine patients were r and omized and no differences were found between arms . The second study tested ten preoperative PR sessions using a customized protocol with nonst and ard components ( exercise prescription based on self efficacy , inspiratory muscle training , and the practice of slow breathing ) ( n=10 ) vs. usual care ( n=9 ) . The PR arm had shorter length of hospital stay by 3 days ( p=0.058 ) , fewer prolonged chest tubes ( 11 % vs. 63 % , p=0.03 ) and fewer days needing a chest tube ( 8.8 vs. 4.3 days p=0.04 ) compared to the controlled arm . A ten-session preoperative PR intervention may improve post operative lung reexpansion evidence d by shorter chest tube times and decrease the length of hospital stay , a crude estimator of post operative morbidity and costs . Our results suggest the potential for short term preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation interventions in patients with moderate-severe COPD undergoing curative lung resection . 4 weeks of conventional preoperative PR seems non feasible
High-intensity interval training ( HIT ) with duration of 2 to 6 weeks seems to be the best exercise programme in a prehabilitation intervention but it exists heterogeneity in terms of intensity and duration .
Prehabilitation increase exercise capacity and significantly enhances pulmonary function .
But the reduction of postoperative complication and mortality has not been clearly demonstrated .
It seems that not all patients can benefit from prehabilitation and it could be indicated only in patients with impaired lung function .
Meanwhile , safety of prehabilitation and good results of some studies support this intervention in high-risk patients
Surgical resection remains the best treatment option for patients with early stage of non-small cell lung cancer ( NSCLC ) .
However , it may be responsible of postoperative complication and mortality , especially in patients with impaired pulmonary function .
Enhanced recovery after surgery ( ERAS ) programs have been focused mainly in minimal invasive surgery approach during lung resection and respiratory rehabilitation after surgery .
Preoperative exercise-based intervention ( prehabilitation ) has demonstrated reduction of morbi-mortality in other surgeries but in thoracic surgery continues to be under discussion .
Cardio-pulmonary exercise test ( CPET ) is the gold st and ard technique to predict postoperative morbi-mortality .
The implementation of a preoperative respiratory rehabilitation could optimize patient 's physical capacity before surgery and improve outcomes and enhance recovery .
The aim of this systematic review of the literature is to identify the effectiveness and safety of prehabilitation programs in thoracic surgery , the type of exercise and its duration , and the group of patients with best benefit .
Prehabilitation is a safe intervention without side effects in patients .