A significant positive effect of the interventions on weight was reported by all study types .
The meta- analysis showed that lifestyle interventions achieved weight and waist circumference reductions after one year .
However , no clear effects on biochemical or clinical parameters were observed , possibly due to short follow-up periods or lack of power of the studies meta-analysed .
Changes in dietary parameters or physical activity were generally not reported .
Most studies assessing feasibility were supportive of implementation of lifestyle interventions in routine clinical care .
Conclusion Lifestyle interventions for patients at high risk of diabetes , delivered by a variety of healthcare providers in routine clinical setting s , are feasible but appear to be of limited clinical benefit one year after intervention .
Despite convincing evidence from structured intensive trials , this systematic review showed that translation into routine practice has less effect on diabetes risk reduction
Background The clinical effectiveness of intensive lifestyle interventions in preventing or delaying diabetes in people at high risk has been established from r and omised trials of structured , intensive interventions conducted in several countries over the past two decades .
The challenge is to translate them into routine clinical setting s. The objective of this review is to determine whether lifestyle interventions delivered to high-risk adult patients in routine clinical care setting s are feasible and effective in achieving reductions in risk factors for diabetes .
Prevention of type 2 diabetes by lifestyle intervention: a Japanese trial in IGT males.
Prevention of type 2 diabetes by intensive lifestyle intervention design ed to achieve and maintain ideal body weight was assessed in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance ( IGT ) . Male subjects with IGT recruited from health-screening examinees were r and omly assigned in a 4:1 ratio to a st and ard intervention group ( control group ) and intensive intervention group ( intervention group ) . The final numbers of subjects were 356 and 102 , respectively . The subjects in the control group and in the intervention group were advised to maintain body mass index ( BMI ) of < 24.0 kg/m2 and of < 22.0 kg/m2 , respectively , by diet and exercise . In the intervention group , detailed instructions on lifestyle were repeated every 3 - 4 months during hospital visits . Diabetes was judged to have developed when two or more consecutive fasting plasma glucose ( FPG ) values exceeded 140 mg/dl . A 100 g oral glucose tolerance test was performed every 6 months to detect improvement of glucose tolerance . The subjects were seen in an ordinary outpatient clinic . The cumulative 4-year incidence of diabetes was 9.3 % in the control group , versus 3.0 % in the intervention group , and the reduction in risk of diabetes was 67.4 % ( P < 0.001 ) . Body weight decreased by 0.39 kg in the control group and by 2.18 kg in the intervention group ( P < 0.001 ) . The control group was subclassified according to increase and decrease in body weight . The incidence of diabetes was positively correlated with the changes in body weight , and the improvement in glucose tolerance was negatively correlated . Subjects with higher FPG at baseline developed diabetes at a higher rate than those with lower FPG . Higher 2h plasma glucose values and higher BMI values at baseline were also associated with a higher incidence of diabetes , but the differences were not significant . Subjects with a low insulinogenic index ( DeltaIRI/DeltaPG 30 min after an oral glucose load ) developed diabetes at a significantly higher rate than those with a normal insulinogenic index . Comparison of the BMI data and incidence of diabetes in five diabetes prevention studies by lifestyle intervention revealed a linear correlation between the incidence of diabetes and the BMI values , with the exception of the DaQing Study . However , the slope of the reduction in incidence of diabetes in the intensive intervention groups was steeper than expected simply on the basis of the reduction of BMI , suggesting that the effect of lifestyle intervention can not be solely ascribed to the body weight reduction . We conclude that lifestyle intervention aim ed at achieving ideal body weight in men with IGT  is effective and can be conducted in an outpatient clinic setting
A significant positive effect of the interventions on weight was reported by all study types .
The meta- analysis showed that lifestyle interventions achieved weight and waist circumference reductions after one year .
However , no clear effects on biochemical or clinical parameters were observed , possibly due to short follow-up periods or lack of power of the studies meta-analysed .
Changes in dietary parameters or physical activity were generally not reported .
Most studies assessing feasibility were supportive of implementation of lifestyle interventions in routine clinical care .
Conclusion Lifestyle interventions for patients at high risk of diabetes , delivered by a variety of healthcare providers in routine clinical setting s , are feasible but appear to be of limited clinical benefit one year after intervention .
Despite convincing evidence from structured intensive trials , this systematic review showed that translation into routine practice has less effect on diabetes risk reduction
Background The clinical effectiveness of intensive lifestyle interventions in preventing or delaying diabetes in people at high risk has been established from r and omised trials of structured , intensive interventions conducted in several countries over the past two decades .
The challenge is to translate them into routine clinical setting s. The objective of this review is to determine whether lifestyle interventions delivered to high-risk adult patients in routine clinical care setting s are feasible and effective in achieving reductions in risk factors for diabetes .