Results indicated that some PFTs may have some prognostic utility , i.e. a trend for more clinical events to be associated with groups classified as ' aspirin resistant ' .
Study -level effect sizes were generally small and absolute outcome risk was not substantially different between ' aspirin resistant ' and ' aspirin sensitive ' design ations .
Based on assumptions of PFTs being able to accurately identify patients at high risk of clinical events and such patients benefiting from treatment modification , the economic model found that a test-treat strategy was likely to be cost-effective .
However , neither assumption is currently evidence based .
BACKGROUND The use of aspirin is well established for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease .
However , a proportion of patients suffer repeat cardiovascular events despite being prescribed aspirin treatment .
It is uncertain whether or not this is due to an inherent inability of aspirin to sufficiently modify platelet activity .
This report aims to investigate whether or not insufficient platelet function inhibition by aspirin ( ' aspirin resistance ' ) , as defined using platelet function tests ( PFTs ) , is linked to the occurrence of adverse clinical outcomes , and further , whether or not patients at risk of future adverse clinical events can be identified through PFTs .
OBJECTIVES To review systematic ally the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness evidence regarding the association between PFT design ation of ' aspirin resistance ' and the risk of adverse clinical outcome ( s ) in patients prescribed aspirin therapy .
To undertake exploratory model-based cost-effectiveness analysis on the use of PFTs .
Personalised antiplatelet therapy in stent thrombosis: observations from the Clopidogrel Resistance in Stent Thrombosis (CREST) registry
Objective Previous studies have demonstrated significant heterogeneity in responses to antiplatelet therapy ( APT ) , and high residual platelet reactivity is associated with the risk of ischaemic events , including stent thrombosis ( ST ) . The prevalence of APT hyporesponsiveness in a ‘ real world ’ registry of ST patients and the feasibility of personalising APT are reported . Patients and setting 39 consecutive patients admitted to a single regional cardiothoracic centre with definite ST were prospect ively evaluated . Interventions Response to aspirin and clopidogrel  was measured following discharge using  short thrombelastography ( TEG ) , a rapid , well vali date d near patient platelet function test . Treatment modification in hyporesponders comprised an increase in aspirin dose and /or changing clopidogrel to prasugrel or ticagrelor . Short TEG was repeated following treatment modification to ensure an adequate response had been achieved . Results 12 ( 31 % ) patients had an adequate response to both aspirin and clopidogrel  , 16 ( 41 % ) were hyporesponsive to clopidogrel alone , one ( 3 % ) was hyporesponsive to aspirin alone and 10 ( 26 % ) were hyporesponsive to both aspirin and clopidogrel . Following treatment modification , an adequate response to aspirin and P2Y12 agent was achieved in 10 ( 91 % ) and 22 ( 85 % ) patients , respectively . None has presented with a further ST episode . Conclusions There is a high prevalence of hyporesponsiveness to APT in patients with ST . Improved APT efficacy can be achieved by tailored therapy . Short TEG is a plausible platelet function test that can be used to deliver point of care personalised APT
Results indicated that some PFTs may have some prognostic utility , i.e. a trend for more clinical events to be associated with groups classified as ' aspirin resistant ' .
Study -level effect sizes were generally small and absolute outcome risk was not substantially different between ' aspirin resistant ' and ' aspirin sensitive ' design ations .
Based on assumptions of PFTs being able to accurately identify patients at high risk of clinical events and such patients benefiting from treatment modification , the economic model found that a test-treat strategy was likely to be cost-effective .
However , neither assumption is currently evidence based .
BACKGROUND The use of aspirin is well established for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease .
However , a proportion of patients suffer repeat cardiovascular events despite being prescribed aspirin treatment .
It is uncertain whether or not this is due to an inherent inability of aspirin to sufficiently modify platelet activity .
This report aims to investigate whether or not insufficient platelet function inhibition by aspirin ( ' aspirin resistance ' ) , as defined using platelet function tests ( PFTs ) , is linked to the occurrence of adverse clinical outcomes , and further , whether or not patients at risk of future adverse clinical events can be identified through PFTs .
OBJECTIVES To review systematic ally the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness evidence regarding the association between PFT design ation of ' aspirin resistance ' and the risk of adverse clinical outcome ( s ) in patients prescribed aspirin therapy .
To undertake exploratory model-based cost-effectiveness analysis on the use of PFTs .