Conclusions All currently available intravenous iron preparations appear to be safe and effective , but ferric carboxymaltose seems to provide a better and quicker correction of haemoglobin and serum ferritin levels in iron-deficient patients
Background Iron deficiency is very common in a number of medical conditions .
Ferric carboxymaltose is a new stable iron preparation that can be administered in single infusions over short periods of time .
The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review of r and omised controlled trials ( RCTs ) regarding the efficacy and safety of the novel complex compared with other iron formulations .
In addition , the feasibility of a network meta- analysis for indirect comparisons was investigated .
Iron deficiency and its management in patients undergoing lipoprotein apheresis. Comparison of two parenteral iron formulations.
OBJECTIVES There is evidence of iron deficiency ( ID ) in patients treated with lipoprotein apheresis .  Aim of this study was to assess ID in apheresis patients and to study its management comparing safety and efficacy of two approved intravenous ( i.v . ) iron formulations . METHODS Inclusion criteria were defined as a ) serum ferritin < 300 μg/l and transferrin saturation < 20 % , b ) ferritin < 100 μg/l . Both iron deficient alone and ID anemic ( IDA ) patients were included . Other causes for anemia were ruled out by thorough history-taking and examination/blood tests . Patients were treated with six different lipoprotein apheresis methods : DALI , Liposorber D , TheraSorb LDL , HELP , MONET and Lipidfiltration .  50 patients were r and omized to either ferric carboxymaltose ( FCM , 500 - 1000 mg as single shot infusion over 20 min ) or ferric gluconate ( FG , 62.5 mg once weekly ) . RESULTS 50 of 67 patients of our Lipoprotein Apheresis Center showed iron deficiency . Both i.v . iron formulations studied were equally safe ( no serious adverse events ( SAEs ) , 6 patients /group showed adverse events ( AEs ) ) and both effective ( clinical ly and with respect to laboratory data ) in lipoprotein apheresis patients , however FCM led to a more rapid and steeper rise of iron parameters . CONCLUSIONS ID and IDA are common findings in lipoprotein apheresis patients . The pathogenesis remains yet poorly understood and is probably multifactorial . Differential diagnosis of ID/IDA is as essential as differential therapy . H and led with care , older i.v . iron preparations like FG appear to be safe and effective in lipoprotein apheresis patients . However , novel formulations like FCM can be administered rapidly at higher doses due to high complex stability , allowing faster filling of iron stores . Newer laboratory parameters ( Reticulocyte-He , low/medium/high fluorescence reticulocytes ( LFR/MFR/HFR ) ) assessing iron status may be helpful in early detection of ID and in monitoring iron replacement therapy
Conclusions All currently available intravenous iron preparations appear to be safe and effective , but ferric carboxymaltose seems to provide a better and quicker correction of haemoglobin and serum ferritin levels in iron-deficient patients
Background Iron deficiency is very common in a number of medical conditions .
Ferric carboxymaltose is a new stable iron preparation that can be administered in single infusions over short periods of time .
The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review of r and omised controlled trials ( RCTs ) regarding the efficacy and safety of the novel complex compared with other iron formulations .
In addition , the feasibility of a network meta- analysis for indirect comparisons was investigated .