This systematic review found robust data demonstrating that engagement in diabetes self-management education results in a statistically significant decrease in A1C levels .
PRACTICE IMPLICATION S The data suggest mode of delivery , hours of engagement , and baseline A1C can affect the likelihood of achieving statistically significant and clinical ly meaningful improvement in A1C
OBJECTIVE Assess effect of diabetes self-management education and support methods , providers , duration , and contact time on glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes .
Effects of motivational interviewing intervention on self-management, psychological and glycemic outcomes in type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial.
BACKGROUND Type 2 diabetes is a serious and growing problem in Taiwan where it is the fifth leading cause of death , and health care costs are 4.3 times higher than for people without diabetes . OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to determine whether participation in a motivational interview for  people with type 2 diabetes would improve their self-management , psychological and glycemic outcomes . DESIGN A r and omized controlled trial to assess the effects of the motivational interviewing intervention . SETTING S Participants were drawn from the diabetes outpatient clinic of a large teaching hospital in South Taiwan . PARTICIPANTS A sample of 250 type 2 diabetes people . METHODS Type 2 diabetes people were r and omly allocated into either the motivational interview group or the usual care group from baseline to 3 months follow-up . The intervention was based on motivational interviewing which encompassed a variety of interviewing techniques , and reflected each person 's readiness stage to change . The control group was provided with usual care by nursing staff . RESULTS A total of 250 type 2 diabetic participants were r and omized . The retention rate in the intervention group was 83 % ( n=104 ) . The motivational interview did improve participants significantly in self-management , self-efficacy , quality of life , and HbA1c among diabetes people with appropriate baseline value ( < 121.24 , < 174.57 , < 107.18 , and > 7.62 , respectively ) but not in depression , anxiety and stress ( F=0.13 , p=0.72 ) compared to the control group at 3 months follow-up . CONCLUSION The findings provided important evidence concerning the positive effect of motivational interventions in self-management , psychological and glycemic outcomes . This research provided evidence for future clinical practice s in diabetes care
This systematic review found robust data demonstrating that engagement in diabetes self-management education results in a statistically significant decrease in A1C levels .
PRACTICE IMPLICATION S The data suggest mode of delivery , hours of engagement , and baseline A1C can affect the likelihood of achieving statistically significant and clinical ly meaningful improvement in A1C
OBJECTIVE Assess effect of diabetes self-management education and support methods , providers , duration , and contact time on glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes .