There were no significant effects of interventions on mean blood pressure or cholesterol levels , prescribing , smoking status or body mass index .
There was some suggestion of a " ceiling effect " whereby interventions have a diminishing beneficial effect once certain levels of risk factor management are reached .
There is weak evidence that regular planned recall of patients for appointments , structured monitoring of risk factors and prescribing , and education for patients can be effective in increasing the proportions of patients within target levels for cholesterol control and blood pressure .
BACKGROUND Ischaemic heart disease ( IHD ) is a major cause of mortality and morbidity and its prevalence is set to increase .
Secondary prevention aims to prevent subsequent acute events in people with established IHD .
While the benefits of individual medical and lifestyle interventions is established , the effectiveness of interventions which seek to improve the way secondary preventive care is delivered in primary care or community setting s is less so .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness of service organisation interventions , identifying which types and elements of service change are associated with most improvement in clinician and patient adherence to secondary prevention recommendations relating to risk factor levels and monitoring ( blood pressure , cholesterol and lifestyle factors such as diet , exercise , smoking and obesity ) and appropriate prophylactic medication .
Randomized controlled trial of an informatics-based intervention to increase statin prescription for secondary prevention of coronary disease
OBJECTIVE : Suboptimal treatment of hyperlipidemia in patients with coronary artery disease ( CAD ) is well documented . We report the impact of a computer-assisted physician-directed intervention to improve secondary prevention of hyperlipidemia . DESIGN AND SETTING : Two hundred thirty-five patients under the care of 14 primary care physicians in an academically affiliated practice with an electronic health record were enrolled in this proof-of-concept physician-blinded r and omized , controlled trial . Each patient with CAD or risk equivalent above National Cholesterol Education Program-recommended low-density lipoprotein ( LDL ) treatment goal for greater than 6 months was r and omized , stratified by physician and baseline LDL . Physicians received a single e-mail per intervention patient . E-mails were visit independent , provided decision support , and facilitated “ one-click ” order writing . MEASUREMENTS : The primary outcomes were changes in hyperlipidemia prescriptions , time to prescription change , and changes in LDL levels . The time spent using the system was assessed among intervention patients . RESULTS : A greater proportion of intervention patients had prescription changes at 1 month ( 15.3 % vs 2 % , P=.001 ) and 1 year ( 24.6 % vs 17.1 % , P=.14 ) . The median interval to first medication adjustment occurred earlier among intervention patients ( 0 vs 7.1 months , P=.005 ) . Among patients with baseline LDLs > 130 mg/dL , the first postintervention LDLs were substantially lower in the intervention group ( 119.0 vs 138.0 mg/dL , P=.04 ) . Physician processing time was under 60 seconds per e-mail . CONCLUSION : A visit-independent disease management tool result ed in significant improvement in secondary prevention of hyperlipidemia at 1-month postintervention and showed a trend toward improvement at 1 year
There were no significant effects of interventions on mean blood pressure or cholesterol levels , prescribing , smoking status or body mass index .
There was some suggestion of a " ceiling effect " whereby interventions have a diminishing beneficial effect once certain levels of risk factor management are reached .
There is weak evidence that regular planned recall of patients for appointments , structured monitoring of risk factors and prescribing , and education for patients can be effective in increasing the proportions of patients within target levels for cholesterol control and blood pressure .
BACKGROUND Ischaemic heart disease ( IHD ) is a major cause of mortality and morbidity and its prevalence is set to increase .
Secondary prevention aims to prevent subsequent acute events in people with established IHD .
While the benefits of individual medical and lifestyle interventions is established , the effectiveness of interventions which seek to improve the way secondary preventive care is delivered in primary care or community setting s is less so .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness of service organisation interventions , identifying which types and elements of service change are associated with most improvement in clinician and patient adherence to secondary prevention recommendations relating to risk factor levels and monitoring ( blood pressure , cholesterol and lifestyle factors such as diet , exercise , smoking and obesity ) and appropriate prophylactic medication .