Although the convergent validity of ImPACT was supported , evidence of discriminant and predictive validity , diagnostic accuracy and responsiveness was inconclusive .
The review found many factors influenced the validity and utility of ImPACT scores .
Background The immediate post concussion assessment and cognitive testing ( ImPACT ) is the most widely used concussion assessment tool .
Despite its popularity , it is unclear if validation studies for the ImPACT test covered all aspects of validity to support its widespread use in research and clinical practice .
Objective The purpose of this report is to review literature surrounding the validity and the utility of the ImPACT test .
Predicting Slow Recovery From Sport-Related Concussion: The New Simple-Complex Distinction
Objective : Following the Second International Conference on Concussion in Sport in 2005 , a summary agreement statement was published that introduced new terminology for sport-related concussions . This new classification system is binary ( ie , “ simple ” versus “ complex ” concussions ) . Athletes who are slow to recover ( ie , > 10 days ) are classified as having complex concussions . The purpose of this study was to determine if high school football players , retrospectively classified as having a simple or a complex concussion , could be differentiated in the first 48 after injury on the basis of symptom reporting or neuropsychological testing . Design : Case-control study . Setting : Pennsylvania high school football programs . Participants : The total sample consisted of 114 concussed high school football players who were identified through a 3 year prospect i ve cohort study . Interventions : All completed a computerized neuropsychological screening evaluation within 72 hours of injury . They were followed clinical ly until they recovered and were cleared to return to play . They were classified retrospectively as having a simple ( n = 55 ) or complex ( n = 59 ) concussion based on their recovery times . Main Outcome Measurements : Neurocognitive test performance and symptom ratings . Results : Within 72 hours after injury , athletes with complex concussions performed more poorly on neuropsychological testing and reported more symptoms than those with simple concussions . Athletes with complex concussions who were slow to recover were 18 times more likely to have 3 unusually low neuropsychological test scores than those with simple concussions ( 95 % CI = 2.3 - 144.9 ) . Athletes with previous concussions did not recover more slowly . Conclusions : This study provides evidence that supports and refutes the clinical usefulness of the new simple-complex concussion classification system
Although the convergent validity of ImPACT was supported , evidence of discriminant and predictive validity , diagnostic accuracy and responsiveness was inconclusive .
The review found many factors influenced the validity and utility of ImPACT scores .
Background The immediate post concussion assessment and cognitive testing ( ImPACT ) is the most widely used concussion assessment tool .
Despite its popularity , it is unclear if validation studies for the ImPACT test covered all aspects of validity to support its widespread use in research and clinical practice .
Objective The purpose of this report is to review literature surrounding the validity and the utility of the ImPACT test .