Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
Maintenance of effects of a home-based physical activity program among breast cancer survivors
Purpose Although physical activity ( PA ) adoption improves fitness and psychological well-being among cancer survivors , PA maintenance has not been examined . This paper presents follow-up of a home-based PA program for women treated for early-stage breast cancer . Material s and methods Eighty-six sedentary women ( mean age = 53.14 years , SD = 9.70 ) were r and omly assigned to a  PA or contact control group . The PA group received a 12-week telephone counseling program to adopt PA . Assessment s were conducted at baseline , end-of-intervention ( 12 weeks ) , 6 , and 9 months post-baseline . Results When comparing change from end-of-intervention ( 12 weeks ) between groups , a significant reduction was observed in minutes of PA at 6 months ( t = −2.10 , p < 0.05 ) , but there was no decrease in intervention effect at 9 months ( t = −0.19 , p = 0.84 ) . Similarly , post-intervention reductions in fatigue were lost at 6 months ( t = 3.27 , p < 0.01 ) , but remained present at 9 months ( t = 1.65 , p = 0.10 ) . PA group ’s fitness improvements were maintained at both follow-ups ( t = 1.04 , p = 0.30 and t = 0.05 , p = 0.96 ) . The previously significant intervention effect on vigor was maintained at 6 months ( t = 1.32 , p = 0.19 ) but was significantly reduced at 9 months ( t = −2.15 , p < 0.05 ) . PA participants were more likely to progress in motivational readiness at 6 ( OR = 5.95 , 95 % CI = 2.30 , 15.36 ) and 9 months ( OR = 4.09 , 95 % CI = 1.69 , 9.87 ) ; however , group differences in meeting PA guidelines were not maintained . ConclusionS ome positive effects of a home-based PA intervention for breast cancer patients were maintained at 6 and 9 months
Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?