The cost of intervention per participant delivered by dietitians was lower than interventions delivered by non-dietitians , although few studies reported costs .
Lifestyle interventions are effective in reducing body weight and glucose-related outcomes .
Dietitian-delivered interventions , compared with those delivered by other personnel , achieved greater weight reduction .
No consistent trend was identified across different delivery channels
BACKGROUND Type 2 diabetes is a significant public health concern .
With the completion of the Diabetes Prevention Program , there has been a proliferation of studies attempting to translate this evidence base into practice .
However , the cost , effectiveness , and cost-effectiveness of these adapted interventions is unknown .
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this systematic review was to conduct a comprehensive meta- analysis to synthesize the effectiveness , cost , and cost-effectiveness of lifestyle diabetes prevention interventions and compare effects by intervention delivery agent ( dietitian vs non-dietitian ) and channel ( in-person vs technology-delivered ) .
Community-Based Translation of the Diabetes Prevention Program’s Lifestyle Intervention in an Underserved Latino Population
Purpose The objective was to take prevention from the clinic to the community by including a high-risk group and working with the community to tailor , enhance , deliver , and evaluate a community-based version of the Diabetes Prevention Program ’s ( DPP ) clinic-based lifestyle intervention . Methods This was a nonr and omized prospect i ve study using a single-group design . Study eligibility included a screening glucose value in the normal to prediabetes range with no current diagnosis of diabetes , overweight , not pregnant nor planning to become pregnant during study period , aged 18 to 65 , Latino , living in the study target communities , and no reported medical restrictions related to the program goals . A total of 69 individuals participated . The Healthy Living Program ( HLP ) was based on the DPP ’s 1-year intensive lifestyle program , was tailored and enhanced for a Latino community , and was delivered by community health workers . Anthropometric and paper and pencil measures were administered to examine program outcome at 6 months and 12 months . Results In general , results indicate statistically significant improvements in anthropometrics and many behavioral outcomes , particularly at 6 months . Participants demonstrated forward movement through the stages of change during the program . Conclusions Results support the effectiveness of the intervention and show that delivery of the translated version of the DPP ’s lifestyle intervention in the community by community residents holds promise as one strategy to reach people at increased risk of developing diabetes . Use of this translation model , including collaboration with community health workers , offers diabetes educators an opportunity to extend their reach into underserved communities
The cost of intervention per participant delivered by dietitians was lower than interventions delivered by non-dietitians , although few studies reported costs .
Lifestyle interventions are effective in reducing body weight and glucose-related outcomes .
Dietitian-delivered interventions , compared with those delivered by other personnel , achieved greater weight reduction .
No consistent trend was identified across different delivery channels
BACKGROUND Type 2 diabetes is a significant public health concern .
With the completion of the Diabetes Prevention Program , there has been a proliferation of studies attempting to translate this evidence base into practice .
However , the cost , effectiveness , and cost-effectiveness of these adapted interventions is unknown .
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this systematic review was to conduct a comprehensive meta- analysis to synthesize the effectiveness , cost , and cost-effectiveness of lifestyle diabetes prevention interventions and compare effects by intervention delivery agent ( dietitian vs non-dietitian ) and channel ( in-person vs technology-delivered ) .