We found high quality evidence that hormone therapy in both primary and secondary prevention conferred no protective effects for all-cause mortality , cardiovascular death , non-fatal myocardial infa rct ion , angina , or revascularisation .
There was no strong evidence of effect on risk of stroke in this group .
Our review findings provide strong evidence that treatment with hormone therapy in post-menopausal women overall , for either primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease events has little if any benefit and causes an increase in the risk of stroke and venous thromboembolic events
BACKGROUND Evidence from systematic review s of observational studies suggests that hormone therapy may have beneficial effects in reducing the incidence of cardiovascular disease events in post-menopausal women , however the results of r and omised controlled trials ( RCTs ) have had mixed results .
This is an up date d version of a Cochrane review published in 2013 .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of hormone therapy for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in post-menopausal women , and whether there are differential effects between use in primary or secondary prevention .
Secondary aims were to undertake exploratory analyses to ( i ) assess the impact of time since menopause that treatment was commenced ( ≥ 10 years versus < 10 years ) , and where these data were not available , use age of trial participants at baseline as a proxy ( ≥ 60 years of age versus < 60 years of age ) ; and ( ii ) assess the effects of length of time on treatment .
Effect of Oral Postmenopausal Hormone Replacement on Progression of Atherosclerosis: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
Abstract —Postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy ( HRT ) is associated with low cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in epidemiological studies . Yet , no r and omized trial has examined whether HRT is effective for prevention of coronary heart disease ( CHD ) in women with increased risk . The objective of this study was to determine whether HRT can slow progression of atherosclerosis , measured as intima-media thickness ( IMT ) in carotid arteries . Carotid IMT is an appropriate intermediate end point to investigate clinical ly relevant effects on atherogenesis . This r and omized , controlled , observer-blind , clinical , single-center trial enrolled 321 healthy postmenopausal women with increased IMT in ≥1 segment of the carotid arteries . For a period of 48 weeks , subjects received either 1 mg/d 17&bgr;-estradiol continuously plus 0.025 mg gestodene for 12 days every month ( st and ard-progestin group ) , or 1 mg 17&bgr;-estradiol plus 0.025 mg gestodene for 12 days every third month ( low-progestin group ) , or no HRT . Maximum IMT in 6 carotid artery segments ( common , bifurcation , and internal , both sides ) was measured by B-mode ultrasound before and after intervention . HRT  did not slow IMT progression in carotid arteries . Mean maximum IMT in the carotid arteries increased by 0.02±0.05 mm in the no HRT group and by 0.03±0.05 and 0.03±0.05 mm , respectively , in the HRT groups ( P > 0.2 ) . HRT  significantly decreased LDL cholesterol , fibrinogen , and follicle-stimulating hormone . In conclusion , 1 year of HRT was not effective in slowing progression of sub clinical atherosclerosis in postmenopausal women at increased risk
We found high quality evidence that hormone therapy in both primary and secondary prevention conferred no protective effects for all-cause mortality , cardiovascular death , non-fatal myocardial infa rct ion , angina , or revascularisation .
There was no strong evidence of effect on risk of stroke in this group .
Our review findings provide strong evidence that treatment with hormone therapy in post-menopausal women overall , for either primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease events has little if any benefit and causes an increase in the risk of stroke and venous thromboembolic events
BACKGROUND Evidence from systematic review s of observational studies suggests that hormone therapy may have beneficial effects in reducing the incidence of cardiovascular disease events in post-menopausal women , however the results of r and omised controlled trials ( RCTs ) have had mixed results .
This is an up date d version of a Cochrane review published in 2013 .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of hormone therapy for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in post-menopausal women , and whether there are differential effects between use in primary or secondary prevention .
Secondary aims were to undertake exploratory analyses to ( i ) assess the impact of time since menopause that treatment was commenced ( ≥ 10 years versus < 10 years ) , and where these data were not available , use age of trial participants at baseline as a proxy ( ≥ 60 years of age versus < 60 years of age ) ; and ( ii ) assess the effects of length of time on treatment .