Subgroup analyses suggested that organisational interventions and interventions on those with baseline HbA1c over 9.5 % had better improvements in HbA1c .
Interventions had a modest improvement of blood pressure and lipids , although baseline levels of control were generally good .
Conclusions This review suggests that interventions for T2DM , in primary care , are better targeted at individuals with very poor glycaemic control and that organisational interventions may be more effective
Objectives Poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus ( T2DM ) is a major international health problem .
Case management for patients with poorly controlled diabetes: a randomized trial.
PURPOSE To evaluate the effects of a collaborative case management intervention for patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes on glycemic control , intermediate cardiovascular outcomes , satisfaction with care , and re source utilization . METHODS We conducted a r and omized controlled trial at two Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Centers involving 246 veterans with diabetes and baseline hemoglobin A(1C ) ( HbA(1C ) ) levels > or=7.5 % . Two nurse practitioner case managers worked with patients and their primary care providers , monitoring and coordinating care for the intervention group for 18 months through the use of telephone contacts , collaborative goal setting , and treatment algorithms . Control patients received educational material s and usual care from their primary care providers . RESULTS At the conclusion of the study , both case management and control patients remained under poor glycemic control and there was little difference between groups in mean exit HbA(1C ) level ( 9.3 % vs. 9.2 % ; difference = 0.1 % ; 95 % confidence interval : -0.4 % to 0.7 % ; P = 0.65 ) . There was also no evidence that the intervention result ed in improvements in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level or blood pressure control or greater intensification in medication therapy . However , intervention patients were substantially more satisfied with their diabetes care , with 82 % rating their providers as better than average compared with 64 % of patients in the control group ( P = 0.04 ) . CONCLUSION An intervention of collaborative case management did not improve key physiologic outcomes for high-risk patients with type 2 diabetes . The type of patients targeted for intervention , organizational factors , and program structure are likely critical determinants of the effectiveness of case management . Health systems must underst and the potential limitations before expending substantial re sources on case management , as the expected improvements in outcomes and downstream cost savings may not always be realized
Subgroup analyses suggested that organisational interventions and interventions on those with baseline HbA1c over 9.5 % had better improvements in HbA1c .
Interventions had a modest improvement of blood pressure and lipids , although baseline levels of control were generally good .
Conclusions This review suggests that interventions for T2DM , in primary care , are better targeted at individuals with very poor glycaemic control and that organisational interventions may be more effective
Objectives Poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus ( T2DM ) is a major international health problem .