Sensitivity analysis indicates that from both perspectives the service is very cost effective and may be cost saving .
CONCLUSIONS These results make alcohol screening and counseling one of the highest-ranking preventive services among the 25 effective services evaluated using st and ardized methods .
BACKGROUND The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force ( USPSTF ) has recommended screening and behavioral counseling interventions in primary care to reduce alcohol misuse .
This study was design ed to develop a st and ardized rating for the clinical ly preventable burden and cost effectiveness of complying with that recommendation that would allow comparisons across many recommended services .
Treatment of problem alcohol use in women of childbearing age: results of a brief intervention trial.
BACKGROUND Studies suggest that 14 % of women age 18 to 40 drink alcohol above recommended limits . Of special concern is the increasing use of alcohol by women during pregnancy . This article reports 48 month follow-up data from a sub analysis of a trial for early alcohol treatment ( Project TrEAT ) focused on women of childbearing age . METHODS Project TrEAT was conducted in the offices of 64 primary care , community-based physicians from 10 Wisconsin counties . Of 5979 female patients ages 18 to 40 who were screened for problem drinking , 205 were r and omized into an experimental group ( n = 103 ) or control group ( n = 102 ) . The intervention consisted of two 15 min , physician-delivered counseling visits that included advice , education , and contracting by using a scripted workbook . A total of 174 subjects ( 85 % ) completed the 48 month follow-up procedures . RESULTS No significant differences were found between the experimental and control groups at baseline for alcohol use , age , socioeconomic status , smoking , depression or anxiety , conduct disorder , lifetime drug use , or health care utilization . The trial found a significant treatment effect in reducing both 7 day alcohol use ( p = 0.0039 ) and binge drinking episodes ( p = 0.0021 ) over the 48 month follow-up period . Women in the experimental group who became pregnant during the follow-up period had the most dramatic decreases in alcohol use . A logistic regression model based on a 20 % or greater reduction in drinking found an odds ratio of 1.93 ( confidence interval 1.07 - 3.46 ) in the sample exposed to physician intervention . Age , smoking , depression , conduct disorder , antisocial personality disorder , and illicit drug use did not reduce drinking significantly . No significant differences were found in health care utilization and health status between groups . CONCLUSIONS This trial provides the first direct evidence that brief intervention is associated with sustained reductions in alcohol consumption by women of childbearing age . The results have enormous implication s for the U.S. health care system
Sensitivity analysis indicates that from both perspectives the service is very cost effective and may be cost saving .
CONCLUSIONS These results make alcohol screening and counseling one of the highest-ranking preventive services among the 25 effective services evaluated using st and ardized methods .
BACKGROUND The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force ( USPSTF ) has recommended screening and behavioral counseling interventions in primary care to reduce alcohol misuse .
This study was design ed to develop a st and ardized rating for the clinical ly preventable burden and cost effectiveness of complying with that recommendation that would allow comparisons across many recommended services .