Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
Multimodal exercise improves quality of life of women being treated for breast cancer, but at what cost? Randomized trial with economic evaluation
To evaluate the efficacy and economic efficiency of a multimedia , multimodal physical activity program for women undergoing adjuvant therapy following surgery for breast cancer . We conducted a r and omized trial with concurrent incremental cost-effectiveness analysis and blinded baseline , 3 , 6 and 12-month follow-up assessment s amongst women undergoing adjuvant therapy following surgery for breast cancer ( n = 89 ) . The intervention was a multimedia , multimodal exercise program comprising strength , balance and endurance training elements . The control was sham flexibility and relaxation program delivered using similar material s. The primary outcome was health-related quality of life ( EQ-5D & VAS , EORTC C30 , BR23 ) . Economic outcomes included direct health care costs and productivity gains and losses . Participants in the intervention group demonstrated greater improvement in health-related quality of life between baseline and the 3-month assessment [ mean ( sd ) EQ-5D VAS ( 0–100 ) baseline : 72.6 ( 15.6 ) , 3 month : 80.6 ( 11.6 ) ] when compared to control group participants [ baseline : 77.5 ( 13.5 ) , 3 month : 74.1 ( 20.6 ) , P = 0.006 ] and also improved more in terms of physical function [ mean ( sd ) EORTC C30 physical function scale intervention ( 0–100 ) baseline : 84.9 ( 14.8 ) , 3 month : 86.9 ( 10.7 ) , control baseline : 91.3 ( 9.6 ) , 3 month : 86.7 ( 14.9 ) , P = 0.02 ] . These improvements were not sustained beyond this point . Upper limb volumes were also lower amongst intervention group participants . However , there was low probability that the intervention would be both less costly and more effective than the control condition ( range probability = 0.05–50.02 % depending on approach ) . Provision of multimodal exercise programs will improve the short-term health of women undergoing adjuvant therapy for breast cancer but are of question able economic efficiency
Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?