Nurses only and multidisciplinary teams were the most frequent professionals to provide education , and most educational interventions were delivered postdischarge .
Psychoeducational interventions were generally effective at reducing smoking and admissions for patients with ACS .
Culturally appropriate health education , self-management educational interventions , group medical visits and psychoeducational interventions were generally effective for patients with T2DM .
Results indicate that there is a body of current evidence about the efficacy of health education , its content and delivery methods for patients with ACS or T2DM .
OBJECTIVES This umbrella review aim ed to identify the current evidence on health education-related interventions for patients with acute coronary syndrome ( ACS ) or type two diabetes mellitus ( T2DM ) ; identify the educational content , delivery methods , intensity , duration and setting required .
The purpose was to provide recommendations for educational interventions for high-risk patients with both ACS and T2DM .
Motivational interviewing delivered by diabetes educators: does it improve blood glucose control among poorly controlled type 2 diabetes patients?
AIM To determine whether glycemic control is improved when motivational interviewing ( MI ) , a patient-centered behavior change strategy , is used with diabetes self management education ( DSME ) as compared to DSME alone . METHODS poorly controlled type 2 diabetes ( T2DM ) patients ( n=234 ) were r and omized into 4 groups : MI+DSME or DSME alone , with or without use of a computerized summary of patient self management barriers . We compared HbA1c changes between groups at 6 months and investigated mediators of HbA1c change . RESULTS study patients attended the majority of the four intervention visits ( mean 3.4 ) , but drop-out rate was high at follow-up research visits ( 35 % ) . Multiple regression showed that groups receiving MI had a mean change in HbA1c that was significantly lower ( less improved ) than those not receiving MI ( t=2.10 ; p=0.037 ) . Mediators of HbA1c change for the total group were diabetes self-care behaviors and diabetes distress ; no between-group differences were found . CONCLUSIONS DSME improved blood glucose control , underlining its benefit for T2DM management . However , MI+DSME was less effective than DSME alone . Overall , weak support was found for the clinical utility of MI in the management of T2DM delivered by diabetes educators
Nurses only and multidisciplinary teams were the most frequent professionals to provide education , and most educational interventions were delivered postdischarge .
Psychoeducational interventions were generally effective at reducing smoking and admissions for patients with ACS .
Culturally appropriate health education , self-management educational interventions , group medical visits and psychoeducational interventions were generally effective for patients with T2DM .
Results indicate that there is a body of current evidence about the efficacy of health education , its content and delivery methods for patients with ACS or T2DM .
OBJECTIVES This umbrella review aim ed to identify the current evidence on health education-related interventions for patients with acute coronary syndrome ( ACS ) or type two diabetes mellitus ( T2DM ) ; identify the educational content , delivery methods , intensity , duration and setting required .
The purpose was to provide recommendations for educational interventions for high-risk patients with both ACS and T2DM .