Conclusions HB exercise is slightly more effective than CB rehabilitation in terms of maintaining EC .
Background Exercise-based cardiovascular rehabilitation ( CR ) improves exercise capacity ( EC ) , lowers cardiovascular risk profile and increases physical functioning in the short term .
However , uptake of and adherence to a physically active lifestyle in the long run remain problematic .
Home-based ( HB ) exercise programmes have been introduced in an attempt to enhance long-term adherence to recommended levels of physical activity ( PA ) .
The current systematic review and meta- analysis aim ed to compare the longer-term effects of HB exercise programmes with usual care ( UC ) or centre-based ( CB ) CR in patients referred for CR .
Six-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial examining hospital versus home-based exercise training after coronary artery bypass graft surgery
Objective To compare the long-term effectiveness of hospital versus telephone-monitored home-based exercise training during  cardiac rehabilitation ( CR ) on exercise capacity and habitual physical activity . Design Six-year follow-up of patients who participated in a r and omised controlled trial of hospital versus monitored home-based exercise training during CR after coronary artery bypass graft surgery . Setting Outpatient CR centre in Central -South Ontario , Canada . Participants 196 Patients who participated in the original r and omised controlled trial and who attended an evaluation 1 year after CR . Interventions 6 months of home or hospital-based exercise training during CR . Main outcome measures Peak oxygen uptake ( peak Vo2 ) , Physical Activity Scale in the Elderly ( PASE ) to assess habitual activity , semi-structured interviews to assess vital status , demographic and descriptive information . Results Of the 196 eligible patients , 144 ( 75.5 % ; 74 Hospital , 70 Home ) were available for participation . Patients were predominantly male ( n=120 ; 83.3 % ) aged 70±9.5 years .  Clinical and sociodemographic outcomes were similar in both groups . While exercise performance declined over time , there were significant between-group differences in peak Vo2 ( 1506±418 ml/min vs 1393±341 ml/min ; p=0.017 ) and PASE scores ( 166.7±90.2 vs 139.7±66.5 ; p=0.001 ) at 6-year follow-up in favour of the home group . Conclusions Home and hospital-based exercise training maintained exercise capacity above pre-CR levels 6 years after CR . Exercise training initiated in the home environment in low-risk patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery conferred greater long-term benefit on Vo2 and persistent physical activity compared with traditional hospital-based CR
Conclusions HB exercise is slightly more effective than CB rehabilitation in terms of maintaining EC .
Background Exercise-based cardiovascular rehabilitation ( CR ) improves exercise capacity ( EC ) , lowers cardiovascular risk profile and increases physical functioning in the short term .
However , uptake of and adherence to a physically active lifestyle in the long run remain problematic .
Home-based ( HB ) exercise programmes have been introduced in an attempt to enhance long-term adherence to recommended levels of physical activity ( PA ) .
The current systematic review and meta- analysis aim ed to compare the longer-term effects of HB exercise programmes with usual care ( UC ) or centre-based ( CB ) CR in patients referred for CR .