Conclusions All interventions produced positive effects on BMD scanning and osteoporosis treatment rates post-fracture .
Despite sizeable increases , investigation and treatment rates remain sub-optimal .
Background There is a large quality of care gap for patients with osteoporosis .
As a fragility fracture is a strong indicator of underlying osteoporosis , it offers an ideal opportunity to initiate investigation and treatment .
However , studies of post-fracture population s document screening and treatment rates below 20 % in most setting s. This is despite the fact that bone mineral density ( BMD ) scans are effective at identifying patients at high risk of fracture , and effective drug treatments are widely available .
Effective interventions are required to remedy this incongruity in current practice .
Medication use patterns for osteoporosis: an assessment of guidelines, treatment rates, and quality improvement interventions.
OBJECTIVE To assess current osteoporosis treatment guidelines , studies of osteoporosis treatment , and interventions to improve osteoporosis treatment . METHODS We search ed the medical literature for articles published between January 1 , 1992 , and December 31 , 2003 , and assessed all relevant articles using a structured data abstract ion process . Because of substantial heterogeneity in study design , no attempt was made to summarize the data using meta-analytic techniques . RESULTS Seventy-six articles met criteria for inclusion . Eighteen practice guidelines were studied . Most guidelines were consistent in key treatment recommendations . Among 18 studies of treatment rates in patients who had fractures , the weighted average varied from 22 % for nonhormonal treatment to 19 % for calcium . We found slightly higher treatment rates for patients taking oral glucocorticoids or for those older than 65 years . There were no consistent correlates of which patients received treatment . Six studies that examined treatment frequencies after bone densitometry all found that patients with lower bone mineral density were more likely to receive treatment . Most of the 8 interventions design ed to improve osteoporosis treatment showed improvement in treatment rates ; however , only 3 were r and omized , and these showed the smallest effects . CONCLUSIONS Frequency of treatment of osteoporosis in at-risk population s is low . However , our assessment of the literature revealed no clear and consistent predictors of undertreatment . Few carefully controlled interventions have been reported
Conclusions All interventions produced positive effects on BMD scanning and osteoporosis treatment rates post-fracture .
Despite sizeable increases , investigation and treatment rates remain sub-optimal .
Background There is a large quality of care gap for patients with osteoporosis .
As a fragility fracture is a strong indicator of underlying osteoporosis , it offers an ideal opportunity to initiate investigation and treatment .
However , studies of post-fracture population s document screening and treatment rates below 20 % in most setting s. This is despite the fact that bone mineral density ( BMD ) scans are effective at identifying patients at high risk of fracture , and effective drug treatments are widely available .
Effective interventions are required to remedy this incongruity in current practice .