Women taking HT had a significantly decreased incidence of fracture with long-term use .
Research ers found no strong evidence that HT has a clinical ly meaningful impact on the incidence of colorectal cancer .
AUTHORS ' CONCLUSIONS : Women with intolerable menopausal symptoms may wish to weigh the benefits of symptom relief against the small absolute risk of harm arising from short-term use of low-dose HT , provided they do not have specific contraindications .
HT may be unsuitable for some women , including those at increased risk of cardiovascular disease , increased risk of thromboembolic disease ( such as those with obesity or a history of venous thrombosis ) or increased risk of some types of cancer ( such as breast cancer , in women with a uterus ) .
The risk of endometrial cancer among women with a uterus taking oestrogen-only HT is well documented .
HT is not indicated for primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease or dementia , nor for prevention of deterioration of cognitive function in postmenopausal women .
Although HT is considered effective for the prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis , it is generally recommended as an option only for women at significant risk for whom non-oestrogen therapies are unsuitable .
BACKGROUND : Hormone therapy ( HT ) is widely provided for control of menopausal symptoms and has been used for the management and prevention of cardiovascular disease , osteoporosis and  dementia in older women .
This is an up date d version of a Cochrane review first published in 2005 .
OBJECTIVES : To assess effects of long-term HT ( at least 1 year 's duration ) on mortality , cardiovascular outcomes , cancer , gallbladder disease , fracture and cognition in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women during and after cessation of treatment .
Postmenopausal hormone use and the risk of nephrolithiasis: results from the Women's Health Initiative hormone therapy trials.
BACKGROUND Observational studies examining the role of estrogen in the risk of kidney stone formation have shown conflicting results . However , r and omized trial evidence on nephrolithiasis risk with  estrogen therapy in postmenopausal women is lacking . METHODS We review ed the incidence of nephrolithiasis in the Women 's Health Initiative estrogen-alone and estrogen plus progestin trials conducted at 40 US clinical centers . A total of 10 739 postmenopausal women with hysterectomy were r and omized to receive 0.625 mg/d of conjugated equine estrogens ( CEE ) or placebo , and 16 608 postmenopausal women without hysterectomy were r and omized to receive placebo or estrogen plus progestin given as CEE plus medroxyprogesterone acetate ( 2.5 mg/d ) . The incidence of nephrolithiasis was determined for an average follow-up of 7.1 years for the CEE trial and 5.6 years for the estrogen plus progestin trial . RESULTS Baseline demographic characteristics and risk factors for nephrolithiasis were similar in the placebo and treatment arms . Estrogen therapy was associated with a significant increase in nephrolithiasis risk from 34 to 39 cases per 10 000 person-years ( hazard ratio , 1.21 ; 95 % confidence interval , 1.03 - 1.44 ) . Censoring data from women when they ceased to adhere to study medication increased the hazard ratio to 1.39 ( 95 % confidence interval , 1.08 - 1.78 ) . The increased nephrolithiasis risk was independent of progestin coadministration , and effects did not vary significantly according to prer and omization history of nephrolithiasis . CONCLUSIONS These data suggest that estrogen therapy increases the risk of nephrolithiasis  in healthy postmenopausal women . These findings should be considered in decision making regarding postmenopausal estrogen use . The mechanisms underlying this higher susceptibility remain to be determined . Trial Registration clinical trials.gov Identifier : NCT0000611
Women taking HT had a significantly decreased incidence of fracture with long-term use .
Research ers found no strong evidence that HT has a clinical ly meaningful impact on the incidence of colorectal cancer .
AUTHORS ' CONCLUSIONS : Women with intolerable menopausal symptoms may wish to weigh the benefits of symptom relief against the small absolute risk of harm arising from short-term use of low-dose HT , provided they do not have specific contraindications .
HT may be unsuitable for some women , including those at increased risk of cardiovascular disease , increased risk of thromboembolic disease ( such as those with obesity or a history of venous thrombosis ) or increased risk of some types of cancer ( such as breast cancer , in women with a uterus ) .
The risk of endometrial cancer among women with a uterus taking oestrogen-only HT is well documented .
HT is not indicated for primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease or dementia , nor for prevention of deterioration of cognitive function in postmenopausal women .
Although HT is considered effective for the prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis , it is generally recommended as an option only for women at significant risk for whom non-oestrogen therapies are unsuitable .
BACKGROUND : Hormone therapy ( HT ) is widely provided for control of menopausal symptoms and has been used for the management and prevention of cardiovascular disease , osteoporosis and  dementia in older women .
This is an up date d version of a Cochrane review first published in 2005 .
OBJECTIVES : To assess effects of long-term HT ( at least 1 year 's duration ) on mortality , cardiovascular outcomes , cancer , gallbladder disease , fracture and cognition in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women during and after cessation of treatment .