Our findings from 55 RCTs and 18 sub-group meta-analyses showed that complex implementation interventions with multiple components consisting of at least education + feedback + follow-up significantly increased the initiation of osteoporosis medications , and interventions with at least education + follow-up significantly increased the initiation of osteoporosis investigations .
No significant impact was found for any type of intervention to reduce fracture .
Complex interventions that include at least education + follow-up or feedback have the most potential for increasing osteoporosis investigations and treatment .
Patient education appears to be an important component in osteoporosis disease management
Osteoporosis is affecting over 200 million people worldwide .
Despite available guidelines , care for these patients remains sub-optimal .
We developed an osteoporosis tool to address the multiple dimensions of chronic disease management .
Findings from its evaluation showed a significant increase from baseline in osteoporosis investigations and treatment , so we are revising this tool to include multiple chronic conditions including an up date of evidence about osteoporosis .
Our objectives were to conduct a systematic review of osteoporosis interventions in adults at risk for osteoporosis .
Interventions to Improving Osteoporosis Screening: An Iowa Research Network (IRENE) Study
Background : Primary care physicians often fail to diagnose low bone density . This pilot study assessed 2 interventions for their effect on bone mineral density testing . Methods : Five practice s in the Iowa Research Network were r and omized : 2 to chart reminder alone ( CR ) , 2 to chart reminder plus mailed patient education ( CR+PtEd ) , and one to usual care .  A total of 204 women aged 65 years or older were recruited from within these practice s. Bayesian hierarchical analyses were used instead of traditional statistical methods to take advantage of collateral data and to adjust for differences between clinics at baseline . Results : After the intervention , the rates of completed bone mineral density testing were 45.2 % in the CR+PtEd group , 31.4 % in the chart remainder only group , and 9.7 % in the usual care practice . Bayesian analysis adjusted for patient and clinic characteristics , which made use of collateral data , gave an odds ratio of 5.47 for the effect of CR+PtEd group . The Bayesian P was .029 and the one-sided 95 % credible interval for the odds ratio was greater than 1.2 . The effect of CR+PtEd was confirmed by sensitivity analyses . Traditional hierarchical analysis adjusted for practice characteristics could not be used to estimate statistical significance because there were not enough clinics to accommo date a model that included all the important covariables . Conclusions : Specific chart reminders to physicians combined with mailed patient education substantially increased the levels of bone density testing and could potentially be used to improve osteoporosis screening in primary care . Bayesian hierarchical analysis makes it possible to assess practice -level interventions when few practice s are r and omized
Our findings from 55 RCTs and 18 sub-group meta-analyses showed that complex implementation interventions with multiple components consisting of at least education + feedback + follow-up significantly increased the initiation of osteoporosis medications , and interventions with at least education + follow-up significantly increased the initiation of osteoporosis investigations .
No significant impact was found for any type of intervention to reduce fracture .
Complex interventions that include at least education + follow-up or feedback have the most potential for increasing osteoporosis investigations and treatment .
Patient education appears to be an important component in osteoporosis disease management
Osteoporosis is affecting over 200 million people worldwide .
Despite available guidelines , care for these patients remains sub-optimal .
We developed an osteoporosis tool to address the multiple dimensions of chronic disease management .
Findings from its evaluation showed a significant increase from baseline in osteoporosis investigations and treatment , so we are revising this tool to include multiple chronic conditions including an up date of evidence about osteoporosis .
Our objectives were to conduct a systematic review of osteoporosis interventions in adults at risk for osteoporosis .