When only trials are considered that include probably blinded ratings or those that are sham-NF or semi-active controlled or those that employed optimally titration procedures , the findings do not support theta/beta NF as a st and alone treatment for children or adolescents with ADHD .
This review concludes that the present role of NF in treating children diagnosed with ADHD should be considered as complementary in a multimodal treatment approach , individualized to the needs of the child , and may be considered a viable alternative to stimulants for a specific group of patients .
This systematic review aim ed to evaluate the efficacy of neurofeedback ( NF ) compared to stimulant medication in treating children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder ( ADHD ) .
Behavioral Effects of Neurofeedback Compared to Stimulants and Physical Activity in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
OBJECTIVE The efficacy of neurofeedback as a treatment for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder ( ADHD ) , and whether neurofeedback is a viable alternative for stimulant medication , is still an intensely debated subject . The current r and omized controlled trial compared neurofeedback to ( 1 ) optimally titrated methylpheni date and ( 2 ) a semi-active control intervention , physical activity , to account for nonspecific effects . METHODS A multicenter 3-way parallel-group study with balanced r and omization was conducted . Children with a DSM-IV-TR diagnosis of ADHD , aged 7 - 13 years , were r and omly allocated to receive neurofeedback ( n = 39 ) , methylpheni date ( n = 36 ) , or physical activity ( n = 37 ) over a period of 10 - 12 weeks . Neurofeedback comprised theta/beta training on the vertex ( Cz ) . Physical activity consisted of moderate to vigorous intensity exercises . Neurofeedback and physical activity were balanced in terms of number ( ~30 ) and duration of sessions . A double-blind pseudor and omized placebo-controlled crossover titration procedure was used to determine an optimal dose in the methylpheni date intervention . Parent and teacher ratings on the Strengths and Difficulties Question naire ( SDQ ) and Strengths and Weaknesses of ADHD Symptoms and Normal Behavior ( SWAN ) were used to assess intervention outcomes . Data collection took place between September 2010 and March 2014 . RESULTS Intention-to-treat analyses revealed an improvement in parent-reported behavior on the SDQ and the SWAN Hyperactivity/Impulsivity scale , irrespective of received intervention ( ηp² = 0.21 - 0.22 , P ≤ .001 ) , whereas the SWAN Inattention scale revealed more improvement in children who received methylpheni date than neurofeedback and physical activity ( ηp² = 0.13 , P ≤ .001 ) . Teachers reported a decrease of ADHD symptoms on all measures for methylpheni date , but not for neurofeedback or physical activity ( range of ηp² = 0.14 - 0.29 , P < .001 ) . CONCLUSIONS The current study found that optimally titrated methylpheni date is superior to neurofeedback and physical activity in decreasing ADHD symptoms in children with ADHD . TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinical Trials.gov identifier : NCT01363544
When only trials are considered that include probably blinded ratings or those that are sham-NF or semi-active controlled or those that employed optimally titration procedures , the findings do not support theta/beta NF as a st and alone treatment for children or adolescents with ADHD .
This review concludes that the present role of NF in treating children diagnosed with ADHD should be considered as complementary in a multimodal treatment approach , individualized to the needs of the child , and may be considered a viable alternative to stimulants for a specific group of patients .
This systematic review aim ed to evaluate the efficacy of neurofeedback ( NF ) compared to stimulant medication in treating children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder ( ADHD ) .