Conclusions MTA cements have a higher success rate , with a lower inflammatory response and a more predictable hard dentin barrier formation  than calcium hydroxide cements .
However , there were no differences , in these parameters , when MTA cement was compared with tricalcium silicate cements .
Dental adhesives systems showed the lowest success rates
Introduction Direct pulp capping therapies use bio material s to protect exposed tissues , inducing repair through the production of a mineralized barrier .
The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of bio material s and techniques by means of a systematic review and meta‐ analysis .
A Randomized Controlled Study of the Use of ProRoot Mineral Trioxide Aggregate and Endocem as Direct Pulp Capping Materials: 3-month versus 1-year Outcomes.
INTRODUCTION The purpose of this study was to assess the long-term clinical outcomes of direct pulp capping ( DPC ) with ProRoot MTA ( Dentsply , Tulsa , OK ) and Endocem ( Maruchi , Wonju , Korea ) as pulp capping material s. To this end , the 1-year cumulative successes of both material s were evaluated and compared with those of the 3-month outcomes in a prospect i ve , r and omized controlled trial . METHODS Patients were recruited from the Department of Conservative Dentistry of the Yonsei University Dental Hospital , Seoul , South Korea , from January to May 2013 . Of the 48 teeth that met the inclusion criteria , 46 teeth were r and omly allocated to either ProRoot MTA or Endocem groups ( n = 23 ) . Direct pulp capping was performed , and clinical and radiographic examinations were conducted over 1 year after the treatment . Survival analyses were conducted to compare the cumulative successes between ProRoot MTA and Endocem and to evaluate other clinical variables . RESULTS Forty-one teeth were recalled 1 year after the treatments ( recall rate = 89.13 % ) . There were no significant differences between the cumulative successes  of ProRoot MTA and Endocem in either log-rank or Cox proportional hazard regression analyses ( P > .05 ) . Among the other clinical variables , cavity type ( class I , II , III vs class V ) was determined to be significant in both the log-rank test ( P = .001 ) and Cox regression analysis ( P = .006 ) . CONCLUSIONS Both ProRoot MTA and Endocem exhibited similar cumulative successes as direct pulp capping material s up to 1 year . The teeth restored with class V cavities exhibited significantly lower cumulative success rates after direct pulp capping compared with the teeth restored with other types of cavities
Conclusions MTA cements have a higher success rate , with a lower inflammatory response and a more predictable hard dentin barrier formation  than calcium hydroxide cements .
However , there were no differences , in these parameters , when MTA cement was compared with tricalcium silicate cements .
Dental adhesives systems showed the lowest success rates
Introduction Direct pulp capping therapies use bio material s to protect exposed tissues , inducing repair through the production of a mineralized barrier .
The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of bio material s and techniques by means of a systematic review and meta‐ analysis .