Specific recommendations for implantation of each prosthesis , taking into consideration the presence of pre-existent conduction abnormalities and anatomical factors , may be needed to reduce the risk of PPI
Aims The incidence of new-onset conduction abnormalities requiring permanent pacemaker implantation ( PPI ) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation ( TAVI ) with new-generation prostheses remains debated .
This systematic review analyses the incidence of PPI after TAVI  with new-generation devices and evaluates the electrical , anatomical , and procedural factors associated with PPI .
In addition , the incidence of PPI after  TAVI with early generation prostheses was review ed for comparison .
Predictors for permanent pacemaker implantation in patients undergoing transfemoral aortic valve implantation with the Edwards Sapien 3 valve
Background Predictors for the need of  permanent pacemaker implantation  ( PPMI ) in the context of transcatheter aortic valve implantation ( TAVI ) are not well defined yet . We evaluated the impact of conduction disturbances , calcium volume of the device l and ing zone , oversizing and implantation depth on PPMI after TAVI with the balloon-exp and able Edwards Sapien 3 ( ES3 ) . Methods and results 335 consecutive patients undergoing transfemoral TAVI with the ES3 for the treatment of symptomatic severe aortic stenosis were included ( clinical trials NCT02162069 ) . Rate of PPMI after TAVI was 18.4 % , excluding patients with permanent pacemakers prior to TAVI or valve-in-valve implantations . Patients requiring PPMI more often had first degree atrioventricular block ( AVB ) at baseline ( 48.7 vs. 16.5 % , p < 0.01 ) , preprocedural complete right bundle branch block ( RBBB ; 25.0 vs. 3.9 % , p < 0.01 ) and higher calcium volume of the aortic valve ( 258.5 ± 317.3 vs. 163.6 ± 178.8 mm³ , p < 0.01 ) . There was a trend towards higher rate of PPMI in patients with new-onset left bundle branch block after TAVI ( 32.7 vs. 20.7 % , p = 0.06 ) . Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that baseline first degree AVB ( odds ratio 3.9 , 95 % confidence interval 1.73–9.10 , p < 0.01 ) and preprocedural complete RBBB ( odds ratio 4.5 , 95 % confidence interval 1.50–13.21 , p < 0.01 ) were independent predictors of PPMI . Of note , neither oversizing nor implantation depth were independent predictors for need of PPMI with the ES3 . Conclusions In patients treated with the ES3 for symptomatic severe aortic stenosis first degree AVB and complete RBBB at baseline were independently associated with higher rates of postprocedural PPMI , whereas implantation depth and oversizing did not have an impact on PPMI
Specific recommendations for implantation of each prosthesis , taking into consideration the presence of pre-existent conduction abnormalities and anatomical factors , may be needed to reduce the risk of PPI
Aims The incidence of new-onset conduction abnormalities requiring permanent pacemaker implantation ( PPI ) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation ( TAVI ) with new-generation prostheses remains debated .
This systematic review analyses the incidence of PPI after TAVI  with new-generation devices and evaluates the electrical , anatomical , and procedural factors associated with PPI .
In addition , the incidence of PPI after  TAVI with early generation prostheses was review ed for comparison .