These data provide both validation and st and ards for other users and indicate the power of the instrument for detecting change in sample population s. CONCLUSIONS The  ODI  remains a valid and vigorous measure and has been a worthwhile outcome measure .
The behavior of the instrument is incompletely understood , particularly in sensitivity to real change
STUDY DESIGN The Oswestry Disability Index ( ODI ) has become one of the principal condition-specific outcome measures used in the management of spinal disorders .
This review is based on publications using the ODI identified from the authors ' personal data bases , the Science Citation Index , and h and search es of Spine and current textbooks of spinal disorders .
OBJECTIVES To review the versions of this instrument , document methods by which it has been vali date d , collate data from scores found in normal and back pain population s , provide curves for power calculations in studies using the ODI , and maintain the ODI as a gold st and ard outcome measure .
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA It has now been 20 years since its original publication .
More than 200 citations exist in the Science Citation Index .
Function and the patient with chronic low back pain.
OBJECTIVE To undertake a comparative examination of the reliability and validity of two frequently used self-report measures of functional disability , the Pain Disability Index  ( PDI ) and the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Question naire  ( OLBPDQ ) . DESIGN A descriptive ex-post facto design was used in the study . SETTING Pain clinics and neurosurgical units at three metropolitan hospitals . SUBJECTS One hundred patients with chronic low back pain of noncancer origin were administered the two question naires as part of a larger question naire battery . RESULTS Acceptable internal consistency values of 0.76 for the PDI and 0.71 for the OLBPDQ were obtained . A correlation of r = 0.63 was found between the PDI and the OLBPDQ , supporting the concurrent validity of the two scales . Both the scales were found to be correlated to the Beck Depression Inventory scores ( PDI , r = 0.42 ; OLBPDQ , r = 0.39 ) , with higher disability associated with greater depression . Only the total PDI score was found to be sensitive to functional status differences within the patient sample . CONCLUSIONS These findings support other recent work in favor of the PDI . The PDI had a slightly higher internal consistency and was more sensitive than the OLBPDQ
These data provide both validation and st and ards for other users and indicate the power of the instrument for detecting change in sample population s. CONCLUSIONS The  ODI  remains a valid and vigorous measure and has been a worthwhile outcome measure .
The behavior of the instrument is incompletely understood , particularly in sensitivity to real change
STUDY DESIGN The Oswestry Disability Index ( ODI ) has become one of the principal condition-specific outcome measures used in the management of spinal disorders .
This review is based on publications using the ODI identified from the authors ' personal data bases , the Science Citation Index , and h and search es of Spine and current textbooks of spinal disorders .
OBJECTIVES To review the versions of this instrument , document methods by which it has been vali date d , collate data from scores found in normal and back pain population s , provide curves for power calculations in studies using the ODI , and maintain the ODI as a gold st and ard outcome measure .
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA It has now been 20 years since its original publication .
More than 200 citations exist in the Science Citation Index .