In this network meta- analysis , we demonstrated that SeR did not show clinical ly meaningful improvement in LUTS and PF .
PATIENT SUMMARY In the present study , we found no clinical ly meaningful improvement of Serenoa repens for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic enlargement .
CONTEXT International guidelines do not make any specific recommendations on Serenoa repens ( SeR ) for the treatment of male lower urinary tract symptoms ( LUTS ) secondary to benign prostatic enlargement ( BPE ) , due to product heterogeneity and method ological limitations of the published trials and meta-analyses .
OBJECTIVE We aim ed to compare the clinical efficacy of hexanic extract of SeR ( HESr ) versus non-HESr ( nHESr ) versus placebo versus alpha-blockers ( ABs ) in patients affected by LUTS secondary to BPE through a network meta- analysis method .
A prospective study of the efficacy of Serenoa repens, Tamsulosin, and Serenoa repens plus Tamsulosin treatment for patients with benign prostate hyperplasia
Introduction Increasing attention has been focused on the use of phytotherapeutic agents to alleviate the symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia ( BPH ) in recent times . The best described and studied phytotherapeutic agent is Serenoa repens ( SR ) . Material s and methods This prospect i ve study was design ed to have 3 arms including SR 320 mg per day ( N = 20 ) , Tamsulosin ( TAM ) 0.4 mg per day ( N = 20 ) and SR + TAM ( N = 20 ) to reveal the superiority or equivalence between these treatment regimens in BPH . Results The groups were not statistically different with regard to increase in maximal urinary flow rate ( Qmax ) and decrease in International Prostate Symptom Score ( I-PSS ) ( P > 0.05 ) . No adverse effect was detected in SR therapy group . Conclusion Treatment of BPH by both SR and TAM seems to be effective alone . None of them had superiority to another and additionally , combined therapy ( SR + TAM ) does not provide extra benefits . Furthermore SR is a well-tolerated agent that can be used alternatively in the treatment of LUTS due to BPH
In this network meta- analysis , we demonstrated that SeR did not show clinical ly meaningful improvement in LUTS and PF .
PATIENT SUMMARY In the present study , we found no clinical ly meaningful improvement of Serenoa repens for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic enlargement .
CONTEXT International guidelines do not make any specific recommendations on Serenoa repens ( SeR ) for the treatment of male lower urinary tract symptoms ( LUTS ) secondary to benign prostatic enlargement ( BPE ) , due to product heterogeneity and method ological limitations of the published trials and meta-analyses .
OBJECTIVE We aim ed to compare the clinical efficacy of hexanic extract of SeR ( HESr ) versus non-HESr ( nHESr ) versus placebo versus alpha-blockers ( ABs ) in patients affected by LUTS secondary to BPE through a network meta- analysis method .