The HBET group did not show improvement in MWD/T compared with the WA group ( SMD 0.30 , 95 % CI -0.45 to 1.05 ; P = 0.43 ; moderate- quality evidence ) .Compared with HBET , SET was more beneficial for PFWD/T but had no effect on quality of life parameters nor on self-reported functional impairment .
Compared with WA , SET was more beneficial for PFWD/T and self-reported functional impairment , as well as for some quality of life parameters ( e.g. , physical functioning , pain , and physical component summary after 12 months ) , and HBET had no effect .
Data show no obvious effects on mortality rates .
Evidence of moderate and high quality shows that SET provides an important benefit for treadmill-measured walking distance ( MWD and PFWD ) compared with HBET and WA , respectively .
Although its clinical relevance has not been definitively demonstrated , this benefit translates to increased MWD of 120 and 210 meters after three months in SET groups .
These increased walking distances are likely to have a positive impact on the lives of patients with IC .
Data provide no clear evidence of a difference between HBET and WA .
Trials show no clear differences in quality of life parameters nor in self-reported functional impairment between SET and HBET .
BACKGROUND Although supervised exercise therapy ( SET ) provides significant symptomatic benefit for patients with intermittent claudication ( IC ) , it remains an underutilized tool .
Widespread implementation of SET is restricted by lack of facilities and funding .
Structured home-based exercise therapy ( HBET ) with an observation component ( e.g. , exercise logbooks , pedometers ) and just walking advice ( WA ) are alternatives to SET .
This is the second up date of a review first published in 2006 .
OBJECTIVES The primary objective was to provide an accurate overview of studies evaluating effects of SET programs , HBET programs , and WA on maximal treadmill walking distance or time ( MWD/T ) for patients with IC .
Secondary objectives were to evaluate effects of SET , HBET , and WA on pain-free treadmill walking distance or time ( PFWD/T ) , quality of life , and self-reported functional impairment .
Exercise training for intermittent claudication: does it adversely affect biochemical markers of the exercise-induced inflammatory response?
OBJECTIVES To identify a stable biochemical marker of disease severity in patients with intermittent claudication and to use these findings to assess the effect of therapeutic exercise training . DESIGN Case-control study : prospect i ve r and omised-controlled trial of exercise training . MATERIAL S AND METHODS Plasma fibrinogen , serum amyloid A protein ( SAA ) , C-reactive protein ( CRP ) and urinary albumin-creatinine ratio ( ACR ) were measured in 67 claudicants and 15 controls . Twenty-two patients were r and omised to supervised exercise training and 17 r and omised to observation .  Subjects were review ed at 3 , 6 and 12 months . RESULTS The median ( interquartile range ) baseline fibrinogen was 3.7 g/l ( 3.3 - 4.25 ) in claudicants and 3.5 g/l ( 2.9 - 3.95 ) in controls ( p = 0.045 ) ; CRP was 4.7 mg/l ( 2.2 - 9.0 ) and 2.1 mg/l ( 1.0 - 2.8 ) , respectively ( p < 0.0001 ) ; SAA was 72 mg/l ( 35 - 132 ) and 30 mg/l ( 20 - 89 ) ( p = 0.0009 ) . Claudicants showed an increased urinary ACR following treadmill exercise ( Wilcoxon , p < 0.0001 ) with no change in controls . Exercise training reduced SAA at 6 months , CRP at 3 months and progressively attenuated the post-exercise increase in ACR . No similar changes were found in controls . CONCLUSIONS Repetitive low- grade inflammatory events in claudicants lead to elevation of serum acute-phase proteins .  Exercise training is associated with symptomatic improvement and reduction inflammatory markers . The concern that exercise has adverse systemic effects therefore seems to be unjustified
The HBET group did not show improvement in MWD/T compared with the WA group ( SMD 0.30 , 95 % CI -0.45 to 1.05 ; P = 0.43 ; moderate- quality evidence ) .Compared with HBET , SET was more beneficial for PFWD/T but had no effect on quality of life parameters nor on self-reported functional impairment .
Compared with WA , SET was more beneficial for PFWD/T and self-reported functional impairment , as well as for some quality of life parameters ( e.g. , physical functioning , pain , and physical component summary after 12 months ) , and HBET had no effect .
Data show no obvious effects on mortality rates .
Evidence of moderate and high quality shows that SET provides an important benefit for treadmill-measured walking distance ( MWD and PFWD ) compared with HBET and WA , respectively .
Although its clinical relevance has not been definitively demonstrated , this benefit translates to increased MWD of 120 and 210 meters after three months in SET groups .
These increased walking distances are likely to have a positive impact on the lives of patients with IC .
Data provide no clear evidence of a difference between HBET and WA .
Trials show no clear differences in quality of life parameters nor in self-reported functional impairment between SET and HBET .
BACKGROUND Although supervised exercise therapy ( SET ) provides significant symptomatic benefit for patients with intermittent claudication ( IC ) , it remains an underutilized tool .
Widespread implementation of SET is restricted by lack of facilities and funding .
Structured home-based exercise therapy ( HBET ) with an observation component ( e.g. , exercise logbooks , pedometers ) and just walking advice ( WA ) are alternatives to SET .
This is the second up date of a review first published in 2006 .
OBJECTIVES The primary objective was to provide an accurate overview of studies evaluating effects of SET programs , HBET programs , and WA on maximal treadmill walking distance or time ( MWD/T ) for patients with IC .
Secondary objectives were to evaluate effects of SET , HBET , and WA on pain-free treadmill walking distance or time ( PFWD/T ) , quality of life , and self-reported functional impairment .