D. Restoration of sinus rhythm for monophasic vs. biphasic waveforms .
Another study showed that PVI result ed in long-term restoration
Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is a major public health problem in the United States .
More than 2.3 million Americans are estimated to have AF ( 1 ) .
The known association between AF and substantial mortality , morbidity , and health care costs compounds the effect of this condition .
Not only is the risk for death in patients with AF twice that of patients without it , but AF can result in myocardial ischemia and infa rct ion , exacerbate heart failure ( HF ) , and cause tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy if the ventricular rate is not well-controlled ( 25 ) .
The most dreaded complication of AF is thromboembolism , especially stroke ( 6 ) .
In some patients , AF or therapies to manage this condition can severely depreciate quality of life ( 710 ) .
Furthermore , the management of AF and its complications is responsible for nearly $ 16 billion in additional costs to the U.S. health care system per year ( 11 ) .
We conducted this systematic review to evaluate the comparative safety and effectiveness of rate- versus rhythm-control strategies ;  medications used for ventricular rate control ; strict versus more lenient rate-control strategies ; nonpharmacologic rate-control therapies  versus medications ; electrical cardioversion and antiarrhythmic medications  for restoration of sinus rhythm ;  and  catheter ablation , surgical ablation , and antiarrhythmic medications  for maintenance of sinus rhythm .
A randomised, controlled study of rate versus rhythm control in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation and heart failure: (CAFÉ-II Study)
Background : Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) and heart failure ( HF ) often coexist . The aim was to investigate whether restoring sinus rhythm ( SR ) could improve cardiac function , symptoms , exercise capacity and quality of life ( QoL ) in patients with chronic heart failure . Methods : Patients with HF and persistent AF receiving guideline -recommended treatments , including anticoagulants , were eligible for the study . Patients were r and omised to either rhythm ( treated with amiodarone for at least 3 months prior to attempting biphasic external cardioversion and continued amiodarone long-term if SR was restored ) or rate control . Anticoagulants were continued throughout the study regardless of rhythm , unless contraindications developed . Both groups were treated with beta blockers and /or digoxin to reduce the heart rate to < 80 bpm at rest and < 110 bpm after walking . Symptoms , walk distance ( 6-minute corridor walk test , 6MWT ) , QoL and cardiac function were assessed at baseline and 1 year . Results : 61 patients with HF and persistent AF ( median duration 14 months ( IQR 5 to 32 ) ) were r and omly assigned to a rate or rhythm control strategy . Of patients assigned to rhythm control ( n = 30 ) , 66 % were in SR at 1 year , and 90 % of those assigned to rate control ( n = 31 ) achieved the heart rate target . At 1 year , NYHA class ( p = 0.424 ) and 6MWT distance ( p = 0.342 ) were similar between groups but patients assigned to rhythm control had improved LV function ( p = 0.014 ) , NT-proBNP concentration ( p = 0.046 ) and QoL ( p = 0.019 ) compared with those assigned to rate control . Greatest improvement was seen in patients in whom SR was maintained . Conclusion : Restoring SR in patients with AF and heart failure may improve QoL and LV function when compared with a strategy of rate control
D. Restoration of sinus rhythm for monophasic vs. biphasic waveforms .
Another study showed that PVI result ed in long-term restoration
Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is a major public health problem in the United States .
More than 2.3 million Americans are estimated to have AF ( 1 ) .
The known association between AF and substantial mortality , morbidity , and health care costs compounds the effect of this condition .
Not only is the risk for death in patients with AF twice that of patients without it , but AF can result in myocardial ischemia and infa rct ion , exacerbate heart failure ( HF ) , and cause tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy if the ventricular rate is not well-controlled ( 25 ) .
The most dreaded complication of AF is thromboembolism , especially stroke ( 6 ) .
In some patients , AF or therapies to manage this condition can severely depreciate quality of life ( 710 ) .
Furthermore , the management of AF and its complications is responsible for nearly $ 16 billion in additional costs to the U.S. health care system per year ( 11 ) .
We conducted this systematic review to evaluate the comparative safety and effectiveness of rate- versus rhythm-control strategies ;  medications used for ventricular rate control ; strict versus more lenient rate-control strategies ; nonpharmacologic rate-control therapies  versus medications ; electrical cardioversion and antiarrhythmic medications  for restoration of sinus rhythm ;  and  catheter ablation , surgical ablation , and antiarrhythmic medications  for maintenance of sinus rhythm .