Conclusions ART single-surface restorations  presented high survival percentages in both primary and permanent posterior teeth , whilst ART multiple-surface restorations presented lower survival percentages .
ART sealants presented a high-caries-preventive effect .
Clinical relevance ART is an effective evidence -based option for treating and preventing carious lesions in primary and permanent posterior teeth
Objective The aim of the present study is to up date the results of two previous meta-analyses , published in 2006 and 2012 , on the survival percentages of  atraumatic restorative treatment ( ART ) restorations and ART sealants .
The current meta- analysis includes Chinese publications not investigated before .
Caries-preventive Effect of Supervised Toothbrushing and Sealants
To investigate the effectiveness of 3 caries-preventive measures on high– and low – caries risk occlusal surfaces of first permanent molars over 3 y. This cluster-r and omized controlled clinical trial covered 242 schoolchildren , 6 to 7 y old , from low socioeconomic areas . At baseline , caries risk was assessed at the tooth surface level , through a combination of ICDAS II ( International Caries Detection and Assessment System ) and fissure depth codes . High – caries risk occlusal surfaces were treated according to daily supervised toothbrushing ( STB ) at school and 2 sealants : composite resin ( CR ) and atraumatic restorative treatment – high-viscosity glass-ionomer cement ( ART-GIC ) . Low – caries risk occlusal surfaces received STB or no intervention . Evaluations were performed after 0.5 , 1 , 2 , and 3 y. A cavitated dentine carious lesion was considered a failure . Data were analyzed according to the proportional hazard rate regression model with frailty correction , Wald test , analysis of variance , and t test , according to the jackknife procedure for calculating st and ard errors . The cumulative survival rates of cavitated dentine carious lesion – free , high – caries risk occlusal surfaces were 95.6 % , 91.4 % , and 90.2 % for STB , CR , and ART-GIC , respectively , over 3 y , which were not statistically significantly different . For low – caries risk occlusal surfaces , no statistically significant difference was observed between the cumulative survival rate of the STB group ( 94.8 % ) and the no-intervention group ( 92.1 % ) over 3 y. There was neither a difference among STB , CR , and ART-GIC on school premises in preventing cavitated dentine carious lesions in high – caries risk occlusal surfaces of first permanent molars nor a difference between STB and no intervention for low – caries risk occlusal surfaces of first permanent molars over 3
Conclusions ART single-surface restorations  presented high survival percentages in both primary and permanent posterior teeth , whilst ART multiple-surface restorations presented lower survival percentages .
ART sealants presented a high-caries-preventive effect .
Clinical relevance ART is an effective evidence -based option for treating and preventing carious lesions in primary and permanent posterior teeth
Objective The aim of the present study is to up date the results of two previous meta-analyses , published in 2006 and 2012 , on the survival percentages of  atraumatic restorative treatment ( ART ) restorations and ART sealants .
The current meta- analysis includes Chinese publications not investigated before .