this guideline reflects the recommendations of the group of specialists of the Brazilian College of Surgeons , the Brazilian Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition and the ACERTO Project for nutritional interventions in the perioperative period of Elective General Surgery .
The prescription of these recommendations can accelerate the postoperative recovery of patients su bmi tted to elective general surgery , with decrease in morbidity , length of stay and rehospitalization , and consequently , of costs
OBJECTIVE to present recommendations based on the ACERTO Project ( Acceleration of Total Post-Operative Recovery ) and supported by evidence related to perioperative nutritional care in General Surgery elective procedures .
Comparative analysis of the efficacy and complications of nasojejunal and jejunostomy on patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.
BACKGROUND The efficacy and feeding-related complications of a nasojejunal feeding tube and jejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy ( PD ) was investigated with a r and omized , controlled clinical trial at the Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital . METHODS Sixty-eight patients who underwent PD in the Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery were r and omly divided into 2 groups : 34 patients received enteral feeding via a nasojejunal tube ( NJT group ) and 34 patients received enteral feeding via a jejunostomy tube ( JT group ) . The assessment of clinical outcome was based on postoperative investigation of complications . The second part of the assessment included tube related complications and an index on catheter efficiency . RESULTS There were 15 cases with infectious complications in the JT group and 13 cases in the NJT group , and there was no significant difference in the rate of infectious complications between the 2 groups . The rate of intestinal obstruction and delayed gastric emptying was significantly decreased in the NJT group ( P < .05 ) . Catheter-related complications were more common in the JT group as compared with the NJT group ( 35.3 % vs 20.6 % , P < .05 ) . The time for removal of the feeding tube and nasogastric tube was significantly decreased in the NJT group . The postoperative hospital stay in the NJT group was significantly decreased ( P < .05 ) , and there was no hospital mortality in this study . CONCLUSION Nasojejunal feeding is safer than jejunostomy , and it is associated with only minor complications . Nasojejunal feeding can significantly decrease the incidence of delayed gastric emptying and shorten the postoperative hospital stay
this guideline reflects the recommendations of the group of specialists of the Brazilian College of Surgeons , the Brazilian Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition and the ACERTO Project for nutritional interventions in the perioperative period of Elective General Surgery .
The prescription of these recommendations can accelerate the postoperative recovery of patients su bmi tted to elective general surgery , with decrease in morbidity , length of stay and rehospitalization , and consequently , of costs
OBJECTIVE to present recommendations based on the ACERTO Project ( Acceleration of Total Post-Operative Recovery ) and supported by evidence related to perioperative nutritional care in General Surgery elective procedures .