Patients experienced significant post-THR improvements in Harris Hip scores , but this did not differ between impact types .
Recipients of cross-linked vs. conventional polyethylene cup liners experienced reduced femoral head penetration and revision .
There was no impact of femoral stem fixation and cup shell design on implant survival rates .
Evidence on mortality and complications ( aseptic loosening , femoral fracture ) was inconclusive .
BACKGROUND Evolvements in the design , fixation methods , size , and bearing surface of implants for  total hip replacement ( THR ) have led to a variety of options for healthcare professionals to consider .
The need to determine the most optimal combinations of THR implant is warranted .
This systematic review evaluated the clinical effectiveness of different types of THR used for the treatment of end stage arthritis of the hip .
No differences in outcomes between cemented and uncemented acetabular components after 12–14 years: results from a randomized controlled trial comparing Duraloc with Charnley cups
Background Even though there are multiple studies documenting the outcome of the Charnley low-friction arthroplasty as well as abundant studies on uncemented arthroplasties , there is a dearth of comparative studies of the uncemented acetabular component and a cemented component . In this study we aim ed to document the long-term clinical and radiographic outcome as well as component survival in a r and omized controlled trial . Material s and methods Two hundred fifteen patients ( 240 hips ) were r and omly allocated to receive a cemented Charnley cup or uncemented Duraloc 1200 cup . All patients received cemented Charnley stems and were evaluated clinical ly and radiographically after 6 months , and 2 , 5 , and 10 years . Results Harris Hip Scores improved from 48.3 [ 95 % confidence interval ( CI ) 45.0–51.6 ] to 90.2 [ 95 % CI 87.9–92.6 ] in the Charnley group and from 49.3 [ 95 % CI 86.9–91.3 ] in the Duraloc group at 6 months . After 10 years , the Charnley group ’s Harris Hip Score was 89.8 [ 95 % confidence interval ( CI ) 87.0–92.6 ] , and the Duraloc group ’s score was 87.3 ( 95 % CI 84.1–90.6 ) . In the radiographic analysis after 10 years , there was no statistical difference in the prevalence of radiographic signs of loosening . Nine cups were revised in the Charnley group , and five cups were removed in the Duraloc group . The difference was not statistically significant . There was no statistical difference between the cups when aseptic loosening was the end-point , nor in survival analyses . Conclusions There is no statistically significant difference in clinical or radiological outcome between the Charnley cup and the Duraloc after 10 years , and no difference in implant survival after 12–14 years . The uncemented Duraloc cup is as good as the cemented Charnley cup after 10 years
Patients experienced significant post-THR improvements in Harris Hip scores , but this did not differ between impact types .
Recipients of cross-linked vs. conventional polyethylene cup liners experienced reduced femoral head penetration and revision .
There was no impact of femoral stem fixation and cup shell design on implant survival rates .
Evidence on mortality and complications ( aseptic loosening , femoral fracture ) was inconclusive .
BACKGROUND Evolvements in the design , fixation methods , size , and bearing surface of implants for  total hip replacement ( THR ) have led to a variety of options for healthcare professionals to consider .
The need to determine the most optimal combinations of THR implant is warranted .
This systematic review evaluated the clinical effectiveness of different types of THR used for the treatment of end stage arthritis of the hip .