Our primary conclusion is that there is a lack of compelling evidence that incentives of any form represent a compelling NCD reduction strategy .
The rising epidemic of non-communicable diseases ( NCDs ) poses substantial health and economic challenges to both individuals and society .
Application of incentive-based strategies based on traditional and behavioural economic theory has emerged as a potential strategy to address rising rates of NCDs .
Yet , whether or not incentives truly represent a promising strategy for addressing NCDs has not been systematic ally addressed nor is it clear whether certain behavioural economic strategies outperform others or simply offering a cash-based incentive for meeting a goal .
In this systematic review we aim to determine whether there is an evidence base for any of these strategies .
Effectiveness of activity trackers with and without incentives to increase physical activity (TRIPPA): a randomised controlled trial.
BACKGROUND Despite the increasing popularity of activity trackers , little evidence exists that they can improve health outcomes . We aim ed to investigate whether use of activity trackers , alone or in combination with cash incentives or charitable donations , lead to increases in physical activity and improvements in health outcomes . METHODS In this r and omised controlled trial , employees from 13 organisations in Singapore were r and omly assigned ( 1:1:1:1 ) with a computer generated assignment schedule to control ( no tracker or incentives ) , Fitbit Zip activity tracker , tracker plus charity incentives , or tracker plus cash incentives .  Participants had to be English speaking , full-time employees , aged 21 - 65 years , able to walk at least ten steps continuously , and non-pregnant . Incentives were tied to weekly steps , and the primary outcome , moderate-to-vigorous physical activity ( MVPA ) bout min per week , was measured via a sealed accelerometer and assessed on an intention-to-treat basis at 6 months ( end of intervention ) and 12 months ( after a 6 month post-intervention follow-up period ) . Other outcome measures included steps , participants meeting 70 000 steps per week target , and health-related outcomes including weight , blood pressure , and quality -of-life measures . This trial is registered at Clinical Trials.gov , number NCT01855776 . FINDINGS Between June 13 , 2013 , and Aug 15 , 2014 , 800 participants were recruited and r and omly assigned to the control ( n=201 ) , Fitbit ( n=203 ) , charity ( n=199 ) , and cash ( n=197 ) groups . At 6 months , compared with control , the cash group logged an additional 29 MVPA bout min per week ( 95 % CI 10 - 47 ; p=0·0024 ) and the charity group an additional 21 MVPA bout min per week ( 2 - 39 ; p=0·0310 ) ; the difference between Fitbit only and control was not significant ( 16 MVPA bout min per week [ -2 to 35 ; p=0·0854 ] ) . Increases in MVPA bout min per week in the cash and charity groups were not significantly greater than that of the Fitbit group . At 12 months , the Fitbit group logged an additional 37 MVPA bout min per week ( 19 - 56 ; p=0·0001 ) and the charity group an additional 32 MVPA bout min per week ( 12 - 51 ; p=0·0013 ) compared with control ; the difference between cash and control was not significant ( 15 MVPA bout min per week [ -5 to 34 ; p=0·1363 ] ) . A decrease in physical activity of -23 MVPA bout min per week ( 95 % CI -42 to -4 ; p=0·0184 ) was seen when comparing the cash group with the Fitbit group . There were no improvements in any health outcomes ( weight , blood pressure , etc ) at either assessment . INTERPRETATION The cash incentive was most effective at increasing MVPA bout min per week at 6 months , but this effect was not sustained 6 months after the incentives were discontinued . At 12 months , the activity tracker with or without charity incentives were effective at stemming the reduction in MVPA bout min per week seen in the control group , but we identified no evidence of improvements in health outcomes , either with or without incentives , calling into question the value of these devices for health promotion . Although other incentive strategies might generate greater increases in step activity and improvements in health outcomes , incentives would probably need to be in place long term to avoid any potential decrease in physical activity result ing from discontinuation . FUNDING Ministry of Health , Singapore
Our primary conclusion is that there is a lack of compelling evidence that incentives of any form represent a compelling NCD reduction strategy .
The rising epidemic of non-communicable diseases ( NCDs ) poses substantial health and economic challenges to both individuals and society .
Application of incentive-based strategies based on traditional and behavioural economic theory has emerged as a potential strategy to address rising rates of NCDs .
Yet , whether or not incentives truly represent a promising strategy for addressing NCDs has not been systematic ally addressed nor is it clear whether certain behavioural economic strategies outperform others or simply offering a cash-based incentive for meeting a goal .
In this systematic review we aim to determine whether there is an evidence base for any of these strategies .