For non-oral HT , decreases in lipoprotein(a ) , cell adhesion molecules , and factor VII generally were significant , resistance to activated protein C ( APCr ) was slightly increased , and other markers including CRP and homocysteine did not change .
Compared with oral HT , changes in CRP and APCr were smaller , changes in cell adhesion molecules and some fibrinolytic parameters tended to be smaller , whereas changes in other factors including lipoprotein(a ) and homocysteine did not differ .
( S ) Potentially unfavorable changes seen with oral HT on two important markers , CRP and APCr , are substantially smaller with non-oral HT .
Non-oral HT has minor effects on the other cardiovascular risk markers studied .
Therefore , compared with oral HT , non-oral HT appears be safer with respect to atherosclerotic and venous thromboembolic disease risk
OBJECTIVE To review the effects of non-oral administration of postmenopausal hormone therapy ( HT ) on risk markers for atherosclerotic and venous thromboembolic disease .
Non-oral postmenopausal HT appears not to increase venous thromboembolic risk , whereas the effect on coronary heart disease risk is less clear .
Cardiovascular disease outcomes during 6.8 years of hormone therapy: Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study follow-up (HERS II).
CONTEXT The Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study ( HERS ) found no overall reduction in risk of coronary heart disease ( CHD ) events among postmenopausal women with CHD . However , in the hormone group , findings did suggest a higher risk of CHD events during the first year , and a decreased risk during years 3 to 5 . OBJECTIVE To determine if the risk reduction observed in the later years of HERS persisted and result ed in an overall reduced risk of CHD events with additional years of follow-up . DESIGN AND SETTING R and omized , blinded , placebo-controlled trial of 4.1 years ' duration ( HERS ) and subsequent unblinded follow-up for 2.7 years ( HERS II ) conducted at outpatient and community setting s at 20 US clinical centers . PARTICIPANTS A total of 2763 postmenopausal women with CHD and average age of 67 years at enrollment in HERS ; 2321 women ( 93 % of those surviving ) consented to follow-up in HERS II . INTERVENTION Participants were r and omly assigned to receive 0.625 mg/d of conjugated estrogens and 2.5 mg of medroxyprogesterone acetate ( n = 1380 ) , or placebo ( n = 1383 ) during HERS ; open-label hormone therapy was prescribed at personal physicians ' discretion during HERS II . The proportions with at least 80 % adherence to hormones declined from 81 % ( year 1 ) to 45 % ( year 6 ) in the hormone group , and increased from 0 % ( year 1 ) to 8 % ( year 6 ) in the placebo group . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was nonfatal myocardial infa rct ion and CHD death . Secondary cardiovascular events were coronary revascularization , hospitalization for unstable angina or congestive heart failure , nonfatal ventricular arrhythmia , sudden death , stroke or transient ischemic attack , and peripheral arterial disease . RESULTS There were no significant decreases in rates of primary CHD events or secondary cardiovascular events among women assigned to the hormone group compared with the placebo group in HERS , HERS II , or overall . The unadjusted relative hazard ( RH ) for CHD events in HERS was 0.99 ( 95 % confidence interval [ CI ] , 0.81 - 1.22 ) ; HERS II , 1.00 ( 95 % CI , 0.77 - 1.29 ) ; and overall , 0.99 ( 0.84 - 1.17 ) . The overall RHs were similar after adjustment for potential confounders and differential use of statins between treatment groups ( RH , 0.97 ; 95 % CI , 0.82 - 1.14 ) , and in analyses restricted to women who were adherent to r and omized treatment assignment ( RH , 0.96 ; 95 % CI , 0.77 - 1.19 ) . CONCLUSIONS Lower rates of CHD events among women in the hormone group in the final years of HERS did not persist during additional years of follow-up . After 6.8 years , hormone therapy did not reduce risk of cardiovascular events in women with CHD . Postmenopausal hormone therapy should not be used to reduce risk for CHD events in women with CHD
For non-oral HT , decreases in lipoprotein(a ) , cell adhesion molecules , and factor VII generally were significant , resistance to activated protein C ( APCr ) was slightly increased , and other markers including CRP and homocysteine did not change .
Compared with oral HT , changes in CRP and APCr were smaller , changes in cell adhesion molecules and some fibrinolytic parameters tended to be smaller , whereas changes in other factors including lipoprotein(a ) and homocysteine did not differ .
( S ) Potentially unfavorable changes seen with oral HT on two important markers , CRP and APCr , are substantially smaller with non-oral HT .
Non-oral HT has minor effects on the other cardiovascular risk markers studied .
Therefore , compared with oral HT , non-oral HT appears be safer with respect to atherosclerotic and venous thromboembolic disease risk
OBJECTIVE To review the effects of non-oral administration of postmenopausal hormone therapy ( HT ) on risk markers for atherosclerotic and venous thromboembolic disease .
Non-oral postmenopausal HT appears not to increase venous thromboembolic risk , whereas the effect on coronary heart disease risk is less clear .