We found no evidence to support short-term or prolonged feeding with a hydrolysed formula compared with exclusive breast feeding for prevention of allergic disease .
Very low- quality evidence indicates that short-term use of an EHF compared with a CMF may prevent infant CMA .
Further trials are recommended before implementation of this practice .We found no evidence to support prolonged feeding with a hydrolysed formula compared with a CMF for prevention of allergic disease in infants unable to be exclusively breast fed
BACKGROUND Infant formulas containing hydrolysed proteins have been widely advocated for preventing allergic disease in infants , in place of st and ard cow 's milk formula ( CMF ) .
However , it is unclear whether the clinical trial evidence supports this .
OBJECTIVES To compare effects on allergic disease when infants are fed a hydrolysed formula versus CMF or human breast milk .
If hydrolysed formulas are effective , to determine what type of hydrolysed formula is most effective , including extensively or partially hydrolysed formula ( EHF/PHF ) .
To determine whether infants at low or high risk of allergic disease , and whether infants receiving early short-term ( first few days after birth ) or prolonged formula feeding benefit from hydrolysed formulas .
Tolerance of a standard intact protein formula versus a partially hydrolyzed formula in healthy, term infants
Background Parents who perceive common infant behaviors as formula intolerance-related often switch formulas without consulting a health professional . Up to one-half of formula-fed infants experience a formula change during the first six months of life . Methods The objective of this study was to assess discontinuance due to study physician-assessed formula intolerance in healthy , term infants . Infants ( 335 ) were r and omized to receive either a st and ard intact cow milk protein formula ( INTACT ) or a partially hydrolyzed cow milk protein formula ( PH ) in a 60 day non-inferiority trial . Discontinuance due to study physician-assessed formula intolerance was the primary outcome . Secondary outcomes included number of infants who discontinued for any reason , including parent-assessed . Results Formula intolerance between groups ( INTACT , 12.3 % vs. PH , 13.7 % ) was similar for infants who completed the study or discontinued due to study physician-assessed formula intolerance . Overall study discontinuance based on parent- vs. study physician-assessed intolerance for all infants ( 14.4 vs.11.1 % ) was significantly different ( P = 0.001 ) . Conclusion This study demonstrated no difference in infant tolerance of intact vs. partially hydrolyzed cow milk protein formulas for healthy , term infants over a 60-day feeding trial , suggesting nonst and ard partially hydrolyzed formulas are not necessary as a first-choice for healthy infants . Parents frequently perceived infant behavior as formula intolerance , paralleling previous reports of unnecessary formula changes . Trial Registration clinical trials.gov :
We found no evidence to support short-term or prolonged feeding with a hydrolysed formula compared with exclusive breast feeding for prevention of allergic disease .
Very low- quality evidence indicates that short-term use of an EHF compared with a CMF may prevent infant CMA .
Further trials are recommended before implementation of this practice .We found no evidence to support prolonged feeding with a hydrolysed formula compared with a CMF for prevention of allergic disease in infants unable to be exclusively breast fed
BACKGROUND Infant formulas containing hydrolysed proteins have been widely advocated for preventing allergic disease in infants , in place of st and ard cow 's milk formula ( CMF ) .
However , it is unclear whether the clinical trial evidence supports this .
OBJECTIVES To compare effects on allergic disease when infants are fed a hydrolysed formula versus CMF or human breast milk .
If hydrolysed formulas are effective , to determine what type of hydrolysed formula is most effective , including extensively or partially hydrolysed formula ( EHF/PHF ) .
To determine whether infants at low or high risk of allergic disease , and whether infants receiving early short-term ( first few days after birth ) or prolonged formula feeding benefit from hydrolysed formulas .