Sensitivity analysis indicates that from both perspectives the service is very cost effective and may be cost saving .
CONCLUSIONS These results make alcohol screening and counseling one of the highest-ranking preventive services among the 25 effective services evaluated using st and ardized methods .
BACKGROUND The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force ( USPSTF ) has recommended screening and behavioral counseling interventions in primary care to reduce alcohol misuse .
This study was design ed to develop a st and ardized rating for the clinical ly preventable burden and cost effectiveness of complying with that recommendation that would allow comparisons across many recommended services .
Moderating drinking by correspondence: an evaluation of a new method of intervention.
Recognizing the need to offer alternative methods of brief interventions , this study developed correspondence treatments for low-dependent problem drinkers and evaluated their impact . One hundred and twenty-one problem drinkers were recruited by media advertisements and were r and omly allocated to a full cognitive-behavioural treatment programme ( CBT ) or to a minimal intervention condition ( MI ) that gave information regarding alcohol misuse and instructions to record drinking++ . As predicted , CBT was more effective than MI in reducing alcohol consumption over the 4-month controlled trial period . CBT produced a 50 % fall in consumption , bringing the average intake of subjects within recommended maximum levels . Treatment gains at 6 months were well maintained to 12 months . High levels of consumer satisfaction , a high representation of women and a substantial participation from isolated rural areas attested to the feasibility of the correspondence programme as an alternative treatment . However , some drinking occasions still involved high intake for a significant subgroup of subjects , and this issue will be addressed in future programmes . The results supported the use of correspondence delivery as a means of promoting early engagement and equity of access between city and country areas
Sensitivity analysis indicates that from both perspectives the service is very cost effective and may be cost saving .
CONCLUSIONS These results make alcohol screening and counseling one of the highest-ranking preventive services among the 25 effective services evaluated using st and ardized methods .
BACKGROUND The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force ( USPSTF ) has recommended screening and behavioral counseling interventions in primary care to reduce alcohol misuse .
This study was design ed to develop a st and ardized rating for the clinical ly preventable burden and cost effectiveness of complying with that recommendation that would allow comparisons across many recommended services .