Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
The effectiveness of a deep water aquatic exercise program in cancer-related fatigue in breast cancer survivors: a randomized controlled trial.
OBJECTIVE To investigate the effectiveness of an 8-week aquatic program on  cancer-related fatigue , as well as physical and psychological outcomes in breast cancer survivors . DESIGN A r and omized controlled trial . SETTING Outpatient clinic , urban , academic medical center , and a sport university swimming pool . PARTICIPANTS Breast cancer survivors ( N=68 ) were r and omly assigned to either an experimental ( aquatic exercise group in deep water pool ) group or a control ( usual care ) group . INTERVENTIONS The intervention group attended aquatic exercise sessions 3 times per week for 8 weeks in a heated deep swimming pool . Sessions lasted 60 minutes in duration : 10 minutes of warm-up , 40 minutes of aerobic and endurance exercises , and 10 minutes of cool-down exercises . Patients allocated to the usual care group followed the oncologist 's recommendations in relation to a healthy lifestyle . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Values for fatigue ( Piper Fatigue Scale ) , mood state ( Profile of Mood States ) , and abdominal ( trunk curl static endurance test ) and leg ( multiple sit-to-st and test ) strength were collected at baseline , after the last treatment session , and at a 6-month follow-up . RESULTS Immediately after discharge , the aquatic exercise group showed a large effect size in total fatigue score ( d=.87 ; 95 % confidence interval , .48 - 1.26 ) , trunk curl endurance ( d=.92 ; 95 % confidence interval , 1.97 - 3.83 ) , and leg strength ( d=1.10 ; .55 - 2.76 ) , but negligible effects in vigor , confusion , and disturbance of mood ( d<.25 ) . At the 6-month follow-up period , the aquatic exercise group maintained large to small effect sizes in fatigue scores , multiple sit-to-st and test , and trunk curl static endurance ( .25>d>.90 ) and negligible effects for the fatigue-severity dimension and different scales of the Profile of Mood States ( d<.25 ) . CONCLUSION An aquatic exercise program conducted in deep water was effective for improving cancer-related fatigue and strength in breast cancer survivors
Interventions to promote exercise in cancer survivors who report better levels of adherence share some common behaviour change techniques .
These involve setting programme goals , prompting practise and self-monitoring and encouraging participants to attempt to generalise behaviours learned in supervised exercise environments to other , non-supervised context s. However , expecting most sedentary survivors to achieve current guideline recommendations of at least 150 minutes per week of aerobic exercise is likely to be unrealistic .
BACKGROUND The beneficial effects of regular exercise for people living with or beyond cancer are becoming apparent .
However , how to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary cancer cohorts is not as well understood .
A large majority of people living with or recovering from cancer do not meet exercise recommendations .
Hence , review ing the evidence on how to promote and sustain exercise behaviour is important .
OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions to promote exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer and to address the following questions : Which interventions are most effective in improving aerobic fitness and skeletal muscle strength and endurance ?
What adverse effects are attributed to different exercise interventions ?
Which interventions are most effective in improving exercise behaviour amongst patients with different cancers ?
Which interventions are most likely to promote long-term ( 12 months or longer ) exercise behaviour ?
What frequency of contact with exercise professionals is associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What theoretical basis is most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?
What behaviour change techniques are most often associated with increased exercise behaviour ?