EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS The most studied combination therapy for the treatment of male LUTS is the α1-adrenoceptor antagonist/5α-reductase inhibitor combination .
This combination seems to be more efficacious in terms of several outcome variables , in particular in men who have moderate-to-severe LUTS and are at risk of disease progression .
Also in terms of nocturia improvements , this combination is significantly more effective than the monotherapy .
The other often studied combination treatment , in both male and female patients with LUTS , was the combination of antimuscarinics ( in particular solifenacin ) and mirabegron .
This combination seems to be more effective in comparison with the monotherapies with respect to urinary incontinence and urgency urinary incontinence episodes and several other objective and subjective parameters , without relevant increase of adverse events .
The combination of hormone therapy and antimuscarinics in women with LUTS does not seem to be useful .
For the treatment of LUTS in men and women , combination therapy appears to be a promising option to optimize the efficacy of the available drugs for those who do not experience sufficient benefit with monotherapy .
This add-on scenario offers the possibility to have a more tailored approach to the management of LUTS , always seeking the optimal balance between efficacy and tolerability for a given patient .
PATIENT SUMMARY Some combination of drugs may offer advantages over monotherapies for the treatment of voiding and storage complaints in men and women
CONTEXT Several drugs are approved and available for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms ( LUTS ) in men and women .
However , the vast majority of available data , upon which the approval and recommendation in guidelines are based , considered only the role of the monotherapies and did not evaluate possible combination therapies .
OBJECTIVE This systematic review analyzes the efficacy and adverse events of combination therapies for male and female LUTS .
Investigation of the clinical efficacy and safety of pregabalin alone or combined with tolterodine in female subjects with idiopathic overactive bladder.
AIMS To assess the efficacy and safety of pregabalin alone or in combination with tolterodine extended release ( ER ) in subjects with idiopathic OAB . METHODS This 26-week , multicenter , r and omized , double-blind , placebo-controlled , three-period crossover study enrolled women aged ≥ 18 years that were diagnosed with OAB and reported ≥ 8 micturitions/24 hr and ≥ 4 urgency episodes/week on 5-day bladder diary at baseline . Subjects were r and omized to 1 of 10 treatment sequences and received three of five treatments , each for 4 weeks with 4-week washout periods : st and ard-dose pregabalin/tolterodine ER ( 150 mg twice daily [BID]/4 mg once daily [ QD ] , n=102 ) , pregabalin alone ( 150 mg BID , n=105 ) , tolterodine ER alone ( 4 mg QD , n=104 ) , low-dose pregabalin/tolterodine ER ( 75 mg BID/2 mg QD , n=105 ) , and placebo ( n=103 ) . Subjects completed 5-day diaries at the end of treatment and washout periods . The primary endpoint was change from baseline to week 4 in mean voided volume ( MVV ) per micturition . The primary comparison was st and ard-dose pregabalin/tolterodine ER versus tolterodine ER alone ; secondary comparisons were pregabalin alone versus tolterodine ER alone and versus placebo . RESULTS Baseline-adjusted changes in MVV were significantly greater after treatment with st and ard-dose pregabalin/tolterodine ER ( 39.5 ml ) versus tolterodine ER alone ( 15.5 ml ; P<0.0001 ) , and with pregabalin alone ( 27.4 ml ) versus tolterodine ER alone ( P=0.005 ) and placebo ( 11.9 ml ; P=0.0006 ) . Treatments were generally well tolerated ; discontinuation rates due to adverse events were 4 % , 2 % , 5 % , 0 % , and 1 % with st and ard- and low-dose pregabalin/tolterodine ER , pregabalin , tolterodine ER , and placebo , respectively . CONCLUSIONS Pregabalin , alone or with tolterodine ER may offer an alternative treatment option for idiopathic OAB in women
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS The most studied combination therapy for the treatment of male LUTS is the α1-adrenoceptor antagonist/5α-reductase inhibitor combination .
This combination seems to be more efficacious in terms of several outcome variables , in particular in men who have moderate-to-severe LUTS and are at risk of disease progression .
Also in terms of nocturia improvements , this combination is significantly more effective than the monotherapy .
The other often studied combination treatment , in both male and female patients with LUTS , was the combination of antimuscarinics ( in particular solifenacin ) and mirabegron .
This combination seems to be more effective in comparison with the monotherapies with respect to urinary incontinence and urgency urinary incontinence episodes and several other objective and subjective parameters , without relevant increase of adverse events .
The combination of hormone therapy and antimuscarinics in women with LUTS does not seem to be useful .
For the treatment of LUTS in men and women , combination therapy appears to be a promising option to optimize the efficacy of the available drugs for those who do not experience sufficient benefit with monotherapy .
This add-on scenario offers the possibility to have a more tailored approach to the management of LUTS , always seeking the optimal balance between efficacy and tolerability for a given patient .
PATIENT SUMMARY Some combination of drugs may offer advantages over monotherapies for the treatment of voiding and storage complaints in men and women
CONTEXT Several drugs are approved and available for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms ( LUTS ) in men and women .
However , the vast majority of available data , upon which the approval and recommendation in guidelines are based , considered only the role of the monotherapies and did not evaluate possible combination therapies .
OBJECTIVE This systematic review analyzes the efficacy and adverse events of combination therapies for male and female LUTS .