Cognitive behavioral therapy may reduce relapse risk for adults with AN after weight restoration , although its efficacy in the underweight state remains unknown .
Variants of family therapy are efficacious in adolescents , but not in adults .
Evidence for AN treatment is weak ; evidence for treatment-related harms and factors associated with efficacy of treatment are weak ; and evidence for differential outcome by sociodemographic factors is nonexistent .
OBJECTIVE The RTI International-University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Evidence -based Practice Center ( RTI-UNC EPC ) systematic ally review ed evidence on efficacy of treatment for anorexia nervosa ( AN ) , harms associated with treatments , factors associated with treatment efficacy , and differential outcome by sociodemographic characteristics .
An evaluation of family therapy in anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa.
A controlled trial comparing family therapy with individual supportive therapy in anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa was undertaken . Eighty patients ( 57 with anorexia nervosa ; 23 with bulimia nervosa ) were first admitted to a specialized unit to restore their weight to normal . Before discharge , they were r and omly allocated to family therapy or the control treatment ( individual supportive therapy ) . After one year of psychological treatment , they were reassessed , using body weight , menstrual function , and ratings on the Morgan and Russell scales . Family therapy was found to be more effective than individual therapy in patients whose illness was not chronic and had begun before the age of 19 years . A more tentative finding was the greater value of individual supportive therapy in older patients . To our knowledge , this is the first controlled trial of family therapy in anorexia nervosa and clarifies the specific indications for this treatment
Cognitive behavioral therapy may reduce relapse risk for adults with AN after weight restoration , although its efficacy in the underweight state remains unknown .
Variants of family therapy are efficacious in adolescents , but not in adults .
Evidence for AN treatment is weak ; evidence for treatment-related harms and factors associated with efficacy of treatment are weak ; and evidence for differential outcome by sociodemographic factors is nonexistent .
OBJECTIVE The RTI International-University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Evidence -based Practice Center ( RTI-UNC EPC ) systematic ally review ed evidence on efficacy of treatment for anorexia nervosa ( AN ) , harms associated with treatments , factors associated with treatment efficacy , and differential outcome by sociodemographic characteristics .