Thus , WIs were seldom design ed to improve return-to-work .
Overall , there was low quality evidence that showed no significant differences between WIs and no intervention for pain prevalence or severity .
If present , significant results in favour of WIs were not sustained across follow-up times .
Overall , this review found low quality evidence that neither supported nor refuted the benefits of any specific WI for pain relief and moderate quality evidence that a multiple-component intervention reduced sickness absence in the intermediate-term , which was not sustained over time .
BACKGROUND Musculoskeletal disorders are the most common cause of disability in many industrial countries .
Recurrent and chronic pain accounts for a substantial portion of workers ' absenteeism .
Neck pain seems to be more prominent in the general population than previously known .
OBJECTIVES To determine the effectiveness of workplace interventions ( WIs ) in adult workers with neck pain .
The effectiveness of a work style intervention and a lifestyle physical activity intervention on the recovery from neck and upper limb symptoms in computer workers
Abstract This study assessed the effectiveness of a single intervention targeting work style and a combined intervention targeting work style and physical activity on the recovery from neck and upper limb symptoms . Computer workers with frequent or long‐term neck and upper limb symptoms were r and omised into the work style group ( WS , n = 152 ) , work style and physical activity group ( WSPA , n = 156 ) , or usual care group ( n = 158 ) . The WS and WSPA group attended six group meetings . All meetings focused on behavioural change with regard to body posture , workplace adjustment , breaks and coping with high work dem and s ( WS and WSPA group ) and physical activity ( WSPA group ) . Pain , disability at work , days with symptoms and months without symptoms were measured at baseline and after 6 ( T1 ) and 12 months ( T2 ) . Self‐reported recovery was assessed at T1/T2 . Both interventions were ineffective in improving recovery . The work style intervention but not the combined intervention was effective in reducing all pain measures . These effects were present in the neck/shoulder , not in the arm/wrist/h and . For the neck/shoulder , the work style intervention group also showed an increased recovery‐rate . Total physical activity increased in all study groups but no differences between groups were observed . To conclude , a group‐based work style intervention focused on behavioural change was effective in improving recovery from neck/shoulder symptoms and reducing pain on the long‐term . The combined intervention was ineffective in increasing total physical activity . Therefore we can not draw conclusions on the effect of increasing physical activity on the recovery from neck and upper limb symptoms
Thus , WIs were seldom design ed to improve return-to-work .
Overall , there was low quality evidence that showed no significant differences between WIs and no intervention for pain prevalence or severity .
If present , significant results in favour of WIs were not sustained across follow-up times .
Overall , this review found low quality evidence that neither supported nor refuted the benefits of any specific WI for pain relief and moderate quality evidence that a multiple-component intervention reduced sickness absence in the intermediate-term , which was not sustained over time .
BACKGROUND Musculoskeletal disorders are the most common cause of disability in many industrial countries .
Recurrent and chronic pain accounts for a substantial portion of workers ' absenteeism .
Neck pain seems to be more prominent in the general population than previously known .
OBJECTIVES To determine the effectiveness of workplace interventions ( WIs ) in adult workers with neck pain .