GTR has a greater effect on probing measures of periodontal treatment than open flap debridement, including improved attachment gain, reduced pocket depth, less increase in gingival recession and more gain in hard tissue probing at re-entry surgery. However there is marked variability between studies and the clinical relevance of these changes is unknown. As a result, it is difficult to draw general conclusions about the clinical benefit of GTR. Whilst there is evidence that GTR can demonstrate a significant improvement over conventional open flap surgery, the factors affecting outcomes are unclear from the literature and these might include study conduct issues such as bias. Therefore, patients and health professionals need to consider the predictability of the technique compared with other methods of treatment before making final decisions on use. Since trial reports were often incomplete, we recommend that future trials should follow the CONSORT statement both in their conduct and reporting. 
There is therefore little value in future research repeating simple, small efficacy studies. The priority should be to identify factors associated with improved outcomes as well as investigating outcomes relevant to patients. Types of research might include large observational studies to generate hypotheses for testing in clinical trials, qualitative studies on patient-centred outcomes and trials exploring innovative analytic methods such as multilevel modelling. Open flap surgery should remain the control comparison in these studies.
Clinical evaluation of a biodegradable collagen membrane in guided tissue regeneration.
A bio-resorbable type I collagen membrane was investigated as a barrier for guided tissue regeneration. Ten human subjects with at least one pair of contralateral periodontal lesions with probing pocket depths of greater than or equal to 5 mm and radiographic evidence of greater than or equal to 40% bone loss were included. Each patient underwent contralateral surgical flap procedures. A collagen barrier was adapted to the tooth in the experimental defect and the flap replaced and sutured. The controls consisted of the same procedure without the placement of the barrier. Standardized measurements of change in probing attachment levels and fill of intrabony defects were obtained at the time of surgery and 1 year later at the time of surgical re-entry. The differences in change of probing attachment levels and amount of bone fill between individual test and control sites were compared utilizing the student's t-test for paired samples. The mean probing attachment gain in the test sites was 0.56 +/- 0.57 mm, and there was a mean probing attachment loss of 0.71 +/- 0.91 mm in the control sites (P less than 0.01). The gain of bone in test lesions was 1.16 +/- 0.95 mm, while no gain was observed in the control lesions (P less than 0.01). The results of this study demonstrated that sites treated with a collagen barrier comprised of cross-linked bovine Type I collagen exhibited significantly better healing as compared to control sites over the 1-year period of the study.