This review provides no clear evidence for the treatment of cirrhotic patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. In practice, third generation cephalosporins have already been established as the standard treatment of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, and it is clear, that empirical antibiotic therapy should be provided in any case. However, until large, well-conducted trials provide more information, practice will remain based on impression, not evidence.
Two different dosages of cefotaxime in the treatment of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhosis: results of a prospective, randomized, multicenter study.
Cefotaxime (CTX) is considered one of the first-choice antibiotics in the therapy of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) in cirrhosis. Because CTX is largely metabolized in the liver, this drug may also be effective in SBP by administering lower doses than those habitually used. To investigate this possibility, a prospective, randomized, multicenter study was performed to compare the therapeutic efficacy of two different dosages of CTX in 143 patients with SBP: 71 (group I) were allocated to receive a high dose (2 g every 6 hours, which is one of the most frequently recommended doses in this infection), and 72 (group II) were allocated to receive a low dose (2 g every 12 hours). At inclusion, both groups were similar in relation to clinical and laboratory data, with the exception of a higher incidence of positive ascitic fluid culture in group I than in group II (59% vs. 40%; P = .029). The rate of infection resolution was similar for both groups (77% vs. 79%). Hospital survival was also similar in both groups (69% vs. 79%). No difference was observed between patients with positive or negative ascitic fluid cultures with regard to infection resolution and patient survival. The duration of antibiotic therapy was similar in both groups (9.0 +/- 3.3 days in group I vs. 8.8 +/- 3.1 days in group II). In a subset of 13 patients from group I and 11 patients from group II CTX levels were determined in serum (peak and trough) and ascitic fluid (concomitantly with trough serum). Peak serum levels were similar in patients from both groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)