There is no reliable evidence from the trials included in this review that any specific initial arch wire material is better or worse than another with regard to speed of alignment or pain. There is no evidence at all about the effect of initial arch wire materials on the important adverse effect of root resorption. Further well-designed and conducted, adequately-powered, RCTs are required to determine whether the performance of initial arch wire materials as demonstrated in the laboratory, makes a clinically important difference to the alignment of teeth in the initial stage of orthodontic treatment in patients.
Multiflex versus superelastic: a randomized clinical trial of the tooth alignment ability of initial arch wires.
Two arch wires commonly used for initial tooth alignment were compared with regard to their clinical effectiveness. The two arch wires tested were 0.0155-inch diameter multiple-stranded stainless steel wire (Dentaflex, Dentaurium, Optident, Yorkshire, England) and 0.014-inch diameter nickel-titanium alloy wire (NiTi, ORMCO Co., Monrovia, Calif.). Consecutive patients attending an orthodontic clinic for routine placement of a fixed appliance were randomly assigned one of these two initial arch wires. Good quality alginate impressions of the appropriate dental arch were taken before arch wire placement and also at the subsequent appointment, which was, on average, 6 weeks later. Seventy-four arches were used in this study. The degree of tooth alignment achieved for each wire type was compared with a Reflex Microscope (Reflex Measurement Ltd., Butleigh, England) to make detailed measurements on the resultant casts. The degree of initial alignment achieved with the two wires was similar over this 6-week period. However, some differences were found for the lower labial segment where the interbracket span is usually reduced and where the superelastic nickel-titanium wire was found to give improved alignment. No threshold of crowding was found where one arch wire performed better than the other.