Despite identifying 34 trials related to treatments for blepharitis, there is no strong evidence for any of the treatments in terms of curing chronic blepharitis. Commercial products are marketed to consumers and prescribed to patients without substantial evidence of effectiveness. Further research is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of such treatments. Any RCT designed for this purpose should separate participants by type of condition (e.g. staphylococcal blepharitis or MGD) in order to minimize imbalances between groups (type I errors) and to achieve statistical power for analyses (prevent type II errors). Medical interventions and commercial products should be compared with conventional lid hygiene measures, such as warm compresses and eyelid margin washing, to determine effectiveness, as well as head-to-head to show comparative effectiveness between treatments. Outcomes of interest should be patient-centered and measured using validated questionnaires or scales. It is important that participants be followed long-term, at least one year, to assess chronic outcomes properly.
Topical ciprofloxacin in the treatment of blepharitis and blepharoconjunctivitis.
An international multicentre study assessed the clinical and antibacterial efficacy of a new topical ophthalmic formulation of the quinolone antimicrobial agent ciprofloxacin and compared it with that of tobramycin ophthalmic solution in patients with blepharitis and blepharoconjunctivitis. The study consisted of a randomised double-masked between-group evaluation of 464 patients, 230 of whom were treated with ciprofloxacin and 234 with tobramycin. There was qualitative and quantitative bacteriology, and clinical assessment of ocular symptoms and signs before and after a seven-day course of treatment. Bacteriological cultures demonstrated eradication or reduction of potentially pathogenic bacteria in 93.7% of eyes (ciprofloxacin) versus 88.9% of eyes (tobramycin), seven days after starting treatment. Clinically more than 80% of patients in both treatment groups were cured or improved after seven days. No statistically significant differences were observed between the two treatment groups. No serious side-effects were observed after use of either antimicrobial agent. Ciprofloxacin ophthalmic solution appears safe and effective. The spectrum of activity and clinical efficacy of this new formulation are discussed in comparison with currently used antimicrobial agents.