A comparison of the effects of human and animal insulin as well as of the adverse reaction profile did not show clinically relevant differences. Many patient-oriented outcomes like health-related quality of life or diabetes complications and mortality were never investigated in high-quality randomised clinical trials. The story of the introduction of human insulin might be repeated by contemporary launching campaigns to introduce pharmaceutical and technological innovations that are not backed up by sufficient proof of their advantages and safety.
Immunological and metabolic responses of patients with history of antibody-induced beef insulin resistance to treatment with beef, pork, human, and sulfated beef insulin.
We evaluated immunological and metabolic responses during therapy with beef (B), pork (P), human (H, rDNA), and sulfated beef (SB) insulins in patients with insulin-antibody-mediated insulin resistance.
                A randomized double-blind sequential crossover study was performed with each insulin administered for 56 days unless dose reached 200 U/day or allergy developed. Participants were 26 individuals with history of B-P insulin dosage greater than or equal to 200 U/day and insulin binding capacities greater than 0.216 nM (30 mU/ml serum). Twenty-one participants completed the study. Insulin dosage/day, fasting plasma glucose, percentage HbA1, insulin antibody binding capacity (IABC), bound insulin (BI), percentage binding of 125I-labeled B, P, and H insulins, and receptor inhibition factor (RIF) were assessed.
                Mean insulin dosage (U/day) was significantly greater on B (88.9) than on P (29.2), H (29.4), or SB (29.6). On B, dosage increased in 12 individuals and reached 200 U/day in 6 individuals. Mean fasting plasma glucose (12.1 mM) and HbA1 (11%) were significantly higher on B than on P, H, and SB. Mean IABC, bound insulin, RIF, and percentage of B, P, and H bound were significantly higher on B than on P, H, and SB. Prolonged treatment with SB before entry into the study (greater than 5 wk) resulted in a blunted anamnestic response to B insulin.
                Rechallenge with B results in anamnestic immunological response and deterioration of metabolic control. SB, H, and P insulins have equivalent effects in patients with insulin antibody-mediated immunologic resistance.