Our review should provide some guidance to clinicians and patients. On the basis of high quality evidence, natalizumab and IFNß-1a (Rebif) are superior to all other treatments for preventing clinical relapses in RRMS in the short-term (24 months) compared to placebo. Moderate quality evidence supports a protective effect of natalizumab and IFNß-1a (Rebif) against disability progression in RRMS in the short-term compared to placebo. These treatments are associated with long-term serious adverse events and their benefit-risk balance might be unfavourable. IFNß-1b (Betaseron) and mitoxantrone probably decreased the odds of the participants with RRMS having relapses, compared with placebo (moderate quality of evidence). The benefit-risk balance with azathioprine is uncertain, however this agent might be effective in decreasing the odds of the participants with RRMS having relapses and disability progression over 24 to 36 months, compared with placebo. The lack of convincing efficacy data shows that IFNß-1a (Avonex), intravenous immunoglobulins, cyclophosphamide and long-term steroids have an unfavourable benefit-risk balance in RRMS. None of the included treatments are effective in decreasing disability progression in patients with progressive MS. It is important to consider that the clinical effects of all these treatments beyond two years are uncertain, a relevant point for a disease of 30 to 40 years duration. Direct head-to-head comparison(s) between natalizumab and IFNß-1a (Rebif) or between azathioprine and IFNß-1a (Rebif) should be top priority on the research agenda and follow-up of the trial cohorts should be mandatory.
Comparison of Betaferon, Avonex, and Rebif in treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.
To compare the relative efficacies of Betaferon, Avonex, and Rebif in the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS).
                Ninety patients with RRMS were randomly allocated to the three treatment groups. The first group received Betaferon, the second group received Avonex, and the third group received Rebif for 24 months. Response to treatment was assessed at 6, 12, and 24 months after start of therapy.
                Of the 30 patients treated with Betaferon, the mean (standard deviation, SD) of relapse rate decreased from 2.2 (0.7) to 0.7 (0.7) episodes. Correspondingly, in the 30 patients treated with Avonex, the mean (SD) of relapse rate decreased from 2.0 (1.2) to 1.2 (0.9) (P < 0.001). In the 30 patients treated with Rebif, the mean (SD) of relapse rate decreased from 2.4 (1.0) to 0.6 (0.9) (P < 0. 01). After 2 years, 43.3% of patients receiving Betaferon and 56.7% of patients receiving Rebif remained relapse-free compared with 20% of those given Avonex. Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) decreased by 0.7 U in Betaferon-treated patients (P < 0.001), 0.3 U in Rebif-treated patients (P < 0.05), and remained stable in Avonex patients.
                Treatment with Betaferon, Avenox, and Rebif significantly reduce relapse rate and EDSS score in patients with RRMS.