Timed-cycle STI have not been proven to be safe in the short term. Although CD4-guided STI strategy has reported favorable outcomes in the short term, the long-term safety, efficacy and tolerability of this strategy has not been fully investigated. Based on the studies we reviewed, the evidence to support the use of timed-cycle STI and CD4-guided STI cycles as a standard of care in the management of chronic suppressed HIV infection is inconclusive.
Long-cycle structured intermittent versus continuous highly active antiretroviral therapy for the treatment of chronic infection with human immunodeficiency virus: effects on drug toxicity and on immunologic and virologic parameters.
We evaluated the effect of long-cycle structured intermittent therapy (SIT; 4 weeks without highly active antiretroviral therapy [HAART] followed by 8 weeks with HAART) versus continuous HAART. The study was prematurely terminated to new enrollment because of the emergence of genetic mutations associated with resistance to antiretroviral drugs in 5 patients. After 48 weeks, there was no significant difference between groups in lipid, hepatic transaminase, and C-reactive protein levels in 41 patients. Although there were no differences in CD4(+) or CD8(+) T cell counts or the percentage of cells that were CD4(+)CD25(+), CD8(+)CD25(+), or CD4(+)DR(+), patients who received SIT had a significantly higher percentage of CD8(+)CD38(+) and CD8(+)DR(+) cells. There was no clear autoimmunization effect by immunologic or virologic parameters. There was no benefit to long-cycle SIT versus continuous HAART with regard to certain toxicity, immunologic, or virologic parameters.