There is good evidence that cementing the prostheses in place will reduce post-operative pain and lead to better mobility. From the trials to date there is no evidence of any difference in outcome between bipolar and unipolar prosthesis. There is some evidence that a total hip replacement leads to better functional outcome than a hemiarthroplasty. Further well-conducted randomised trials are required.
Treatment of femoral neck fractures with total hip replacement versus cemented and noncemented hemiarthroplasty.
A prospective study of displaced femoral neck fractures was conducted with patients randomized into three groups: cemented total hip replacement (THR), cemented hemiarthroplasty (UHR-C), and noncemented hemiarthroplasty (UHR-NC). Eighty-nine patients were treated for displaced (Garden type 3 or 4) fracture with a prosthesis; 39 patients had THR, 37 had UHR-C, and 13 had UHR-NC. No difference was found in the level of pain, ambulation, or aids required between the THR group and the UHR-C group, except for active community ambulators, who demonstrated decreased endurance capability when treated with UHR-C. The patients treated with UHR-NC had increased pain and decreased ambulation and required assistive devices. The most significant complication was dislocation, which occurred in 7 patients with THR and 2 with UHR-C. The mortality rate at 2 years was 18%; all but two of the deaths were in patients with one of five different medical diseases: clinically significant cardiac or pulmonary disease, cancer, alcoholism, or psychosis. The mortality rate was insignificant in patients younger than 70 years of age. Roentgenographic review showed only 2 of 76 cemented stems with progressive cement-bone demarcation, with one patient requiring revision for a loose prosthesis. No evidence of protrusio was seen with the use of the bipolar cap. The uncemented hemiarthroplasties demonstrated lucency between the metal and bone in the proximal femur in 9 of 13 stems. The authors make recommendations regarding hip replacement.