HS reduces the volume of intravenous fluid required to maintain patients undergoing surgery but transiently increases serum sodium. It is not known if HS effects patient survival and morbidity but it should be tested in randomized clinical trials that are designed and powered to test these outcomes.
The comparison of hypertonic saline (7.5%) and normal saline (0.9%) for initial fluid administration before spinal anesthesia.
Hypertonic saline can be used for initial fluid administration before spinal anesthesia. It is effective in small-volume fluid resuscitation. This randomized double-blinded study compared the effects of 7.5% hypertonic saline (HS) and 0.9% normal saline (NS) in doses containing 2 mmol/kg of sodium in 40 ASA physical status I-II patients undergoing arthroscopy or other lower limb surgery under spinal anesthesia. We infused 1.6 mL/kg of HS or 13 mL/kg of NS for initial fluid administration before spinal anesthesia induced with a 10-mg dose of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine. Etilefrine was administered to maintain mean arterial pressure at > or =80% of its control value. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, and cardiac index did not differ between the groups, and the amount of etilefrine administered was similar in the treatment groups. In all our patients, the plasma sodium concentrations were within the normal range after surgery and serum osmolality was within the normal range after spinal anesthesia. The time and the volume of the first micturition were similar in both groups, despite the much smaller amount of infused free water in the HS group. We conclude that 7.5% HS was as good as NS for the initial fluid administration before spinal anesthesia when the amount of sodium was kept unchanged.