Regimens for the acute phase of illness should contain ceftazidime or imipenem. It is not yet clear if combinations of treatments in the early phase reduce relapse. For oral therapy after the acute phase of treatment, trials suggest that conventional four drug regimens can be used for treatment.
Randomized, double-blind, controlled study of cefoperazone-sulbactam plus cotrimoxazole versus ceftazidime plus cotrimoxazole for the treatment of severe melioidosis.
We conducted a prospective randomized, double-blind, controlled study of cefoperazone-sulbactam (ratio, 1:1; cefoperazone 25 mg/kg/day) plus cotrimoxazole (trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole [TMP-SMZ] at a ratio of 80:400; TMP, 8 mg/kg/day) versus ceftazidime (100 mg/kg/day) plus cotrimoxazole (TMP, 8 mg/kg/day) for the treatment of severe melioidosis. Of 219 patients enrolled in the study, 102 (47%) had culture-proven melioidosis. These patients were assigned randomly to 2 treatment groups, each with 50 patients (2 patients were excluded). Mortality rates were not significantly different between the 2 groups: 18% in the cefoperazone-sulbactam group versus 14% in the ceftazidime group. The crude difference in the mortality rate was 4%, but when adjusted for type of infection the difference was 0.9% (95% confidence interval, -3.6% to 5.4%; P = .696). The duration of defervescence and the bacteriological response of successfully treated patients were similar in both groups, and both treatment regimens were well tolerated. Cefoperazone-sulbactam plus cotrimoxazole might be used as an alternative to ceftazidime plus cotrimoxazole as treatment for severe melioidosis.