Our review should provide some guidance to clinicians and patients. On the basis of high quality evidence, natalizumab and IFNß-1a (Rebif) are superior to all other treatments for preventing clinical relapses in RRMS in the short-term (24 months) compared to placebo. Moderate quality evidence supports a protective effect of natalizumab and IFNß-1a (Rebif) against disability progression in RRMS in the short-term compared to placebo. These treatments are associated with long-term serious adverse events and their benefit-risk balance might be unfavourable. IFNß-1b (Betaseron) and mitoxantrone probably decreased the odds of the participants with RRMS having relapses, compared with placebo (moderate quality of evidence). The benefit-risk balance with azathioprine is uncertain, however this agent might be effective in decreasing the odds of the participants with RRMS having relapses and disability progression over 24 to 36 months, compared with placebo. The lack of convincing efficacy data shows that IFNß-1a (Avonex), intravenous immunoglobulins, cyclophosphamide and long-term steroids have an unfavourable benefit-risk balance in RRMS. None of the included treatments are effective in decreasing disability progression in patients with progressive MS. It is important to consider that the clinical effects of all these treatments beyond two years are uncertain, a relevant point for a disease of 30 to 40 years duration. Direct head-to-head comparison(s) between natalizumab and IFNß-1a (Rebif) or between azathioprine and IFNß-1a (Rebif) should be top priority on the research agenda and follow-up of the trial cohorts should be mandatory.
A randomized study of two interferon-beta treatments in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.
To investigate whether the efficacy of interferon-beta (IFNbeta) treatment of relapsing-remitting MS (RR-MS) was influenced by type, dose, and frequency of administration.
                From June 1996 through October 1997, the authors offered participation to all Danish RR-MS patients who met the following criteria: definite MS, at least two relapses within 2 years, age 18 to 55, and an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of < or = 5.5. The study was multicenter, controlled, open-label, randomized, head-to-head comparing IFNbeta-1a 22 microg once a week (n = 143) with IFNbeta-1b 250 microg every other day (n = 158), both subcutaneously, for 24 months. Patients who declined randomization were offered treatment with IFNbeta-1b 250 microg every other day (n = 120). The primary end-points were the annualized relapse rate, the time to first relapse, and neutralizing antibody formation. The secondary endpoint was time to sustained progression.
                The annual relapse rates were virtually equal in the two arms of the randomized study (IFNbeta-1a: 0.70; IFNbeta-1b: 0.71); so were the time to first relapse and the time to sustained progression. In the nonrandomized patients (IFNbeta-1b), the annual relapse rate was not significantly different, but the time to progression was shorter.
                In this study, 250 microg interferon-beta-1b administered every other day did not prove clinically superior to once-a-week administration of 22 microg interferon-beta-1a.