The findings of this review indicate that the number of systemic and topical drugs used for the different subforms of pruritus is increasing. Different interventions have been shown to be effective in the treatment of pruritus of different origins. Nevertheless, an optimal therapy for pruritus is constrained due to the limited understanding of crucial itch mediators and receptors in the various subforms of itch. Ideal antipruritic therapies are still lacking, especially for palliative care patients.
This systematic review also indicates that there is insufficient evidence to give any concrete recommendations regarding treatment of pruritus in palliative care patients. Due to the very small sample sizes and poor methodological quality of the majority of studies that were included, the results of this review need to be interpreted with caution. Furthermore, the generalizability is questionable. Additional studies, and particularly carefully designed treatment trials, are needed to provide valid evidence for adequate treatment of pruritus in palliative care patients.
Ondansetron therapy for uremic pruritus in hemodialysis patients.
Pruritus is a distressing symptom affecting up to 90% of dialysis patients. Conventional treatment with antihistamines is often ineffective and may have unacceptable side effects. Serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 [5-HT(3)]) is known to enhance pain perception and pruritic symptoms through receptors on sensory nerve endings. Antagonism of 5-HT(3) receptors may be of use in treating uremic pruritus. We randomly assigned 16 hemodialysis patients with persistent pruritus to treatment with the 5-HT(3)-receptor antagonist, ondansetron (8 mg), or placebo three times daily for 2 weeks each in a prospective, placebo-controlled, double-blind crossover study. Patients scored their intensity of pruritus daily on a 0-to-10 visual analogue scale (0 = no pruritus, 10 = maximal pruritus), and daily use of antihistamines as escape medication was recorded. The median daily pruritus score did not change significantly during active or placebo treatment (preondansetron, 5. 3; interquartile range [IQR], 3.4 to 6.3; during ondansetron, 3.9; IQR, 2.7 to 5.0; P = not significant; preplacebo, 3.7; IQR, 3.0 to 4. 6; during placebo, 3.6; IQR, 2.4 to 4.8; P = not significant). The median daily percentage of escape medication use decreased from 21% (IQR, 9 to 61) to 9% (IQR, 0 to 33) with ondansetron (P = not significant) and from 53% (IQR, 0 to 88) to 5% (IQR, 0 to 31) with placebo (P = not significant). There was no difference in predialysis biochemistry test results or dialysis efficacy during treatment phases. Ondansetron does not improve pruritus in hemodialysis patients. Use of antihistamines decreased with both ondansetron and placebo.