HPV-triage with HC2 can be recommended to triage women with ASCUS because it has higher accuracy (significantly higher sensitivity, and similar specificity) than repeat cytology.


When triaging women with LSIL, an HC2 test yields a significantly higher sensitivity, but a significantly lower specificity, compared to a repeat cytology. Therefore, practice recommendations for management of women with LSIL should be balanced, taking local circumstances into account.
Comparison of two signal-amplification DNA tests for high-risk HPV as an aid to colposcopy.
To compare Hybrid Capture Tube (HCT) and the second-generation Hybrid Capture II (HC II) test for detection of high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA at the time of colposcopy.
                Colposcopy and HPV testing were performed by HCT and HC II on 1,309 women for evaluation of abnormal Pap smears. Differences in the proportions were tested with chi 2 and 95% CI calculations.
                When compared to HCT, HC II was more often positive in women with any abnormal Pap smear (44% [95% CI 41-46%] vs. 34% [31-37%], P < .005) and in the subset of women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance Pap smears (32% [29-35%] vs. 24% [22-27%], P < .005). HC II was more sensitive in detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 or worse (93% [88-97%] vs. 78% [70-84%], P < .005) and had a lower rate of undetected > or = CIN 2 in HPV test-negative subjects (1.5% [0.7-2.7%]) vs. 4.3% [3.0-5.9%], P < .005). HC II was also more often positive in women with negative colposcopic evaluations (29% [25.7-32.4%] vs. 20% [17.6-23.5%], P < .005). The specificity of HC II in detection of > or = CIN 2 was lower than that for HCT (63% [60.5-66.2%] vs. 73% [69.5-74.8%], P < .005).