There is no evidence for any short-term or long-term advantage in peritoneal closure for non-obstetric operations. If further trials are performed on this topic, they should have an adequate period of follow-up and adequate measures should be taken to ensure that the results are not subject to bias.
Is closure of the peritoneal layer necessary in the repair of midline surgical abdominal wounds?
This study describes a prospective randomized controlled trial to evaluate whether suture of the peritoneal layer is necessary as a separate step in the closure of midline abdominal surgical wounds. Consecutive patients undergoing abdominal operation--elective and emergency surgery--through a midline abdominal wound were randomized to have the peritoneal layer closed with continuous catgut, or to have this step omitted. The linea alba was closed with interrupted stainless steel sutures, and the skin approximated with staples. Patients were evaluated for wound sepsis, wound dehiscence, and subsequent incisional hernia development. Postoperative pain was assessed by a self-administered visual analogue score, and by measuring narcotic requirements. There was no significant difference in narcotic requirements, pain scores, or wound complications between the 2 groups. Single-layer closure of the abdominal wall is quicker, less costly, and theoretically safer than layered closure, and it is recommended that separate suture of the peritoneum be abandoned.