Improvement in control of maternal blood pressure with use of beta-blockers would be worthwhile only if it were reflected in substantive benefits for mother and/or baby, and none have been clearly demonstrated. The effect of beta-blockers on perinatal outcome is uncertain; the worrying trend to an increase in SGA infants is partly dependent on one small outlying trial. Large randomised trials are needed to determine whether antihypertensive therapy in general (rather than beta-blocker therapy specifically) results in greater benefit than risk, for treatment of mild-moderate pregnancy hypertension. If so, then it would be appropriate to consider which antihypertensive is best, and beta-blockers should be evaluated.
[Note: the seventeen reports in the awaiting classification section of the review may alter the conclusions of the review once assessed.]
A comparative evaluation of metoprolol and methyldopa in the management of pregnancy induced hypertension.
Thirty patients matched for age, parity, socioeconomic status and severity of pregnancy induced hypertension (PIH) were randomly allocated to treatment with metoprolol or methyldopa. The average fall in diastolic blood pressure was significant in the group treated with metoprolol as compared with the methyldopa group (p less than 0.01). There were 3 perinatal deaths in the methyldopa group and 1 in the metoprolol group; the mean birth weight of the babies was higher in cases treated with metoprolol. The results suggest metoprolol to be more efficacious with regard to control of hypertension and fetal outcome in cases of pregnancy induced hypertension.