Question: Who died on the way to her trial after being accused of the death of Francis Manners two sons?

Context paragraphs:
Francis Manners, 6th Earl of Rutland: Francis Manners, 6th Earl of Rutland, KG (1578–1632) was an English nobleman.  Despite a brief imprisonment for his involvement in the Essex Rebellion of 1601, he became prominent at the court of James I.  He lived at Belvoir Castle in Leicestershire.  In 1618 three women, the "Witches of Belvoir", were accused of witchcraft for having allegedly caused the deaths of his two young sons.

Witches of Belvoir: The Belvoir Witches were three women, a mother and her two daughters, accused of witchcraft in England around 1618.  The mother, Joan Flower, died on the way to her trial, and the two daughters, Margaret and Philippa, were supposed to be hung in Lincoln.  It is said that Phillipa drugged the guards and managed to escape and making her way to Kent where she died after having 3 children.

Stories of divine birth in the eighteenth dynasty: Hatshepsut’s royal lineage was established through her parents, Thutmose I her father and The Great Royal Wife Ahmose, her mother.  Thutmose I had two sons and a daughter, Amenmose, Wadjmose and Hatshepsut, through Ahmose.  Egyptian hierarchy established the eldest sons as heirs to the throne; however, with the death of these two sons at an early age, it is still possible to produce a son through a secondary wife or lesser wife.  Mutnofret, Thutmose I’s secondary wife gave birth to a son, Thutmose II, giving him lineage to the throne.  To legitimize Thutmose II’s reign, he married his half-sister Hatshepsut, who carried the royal Ahmose blood line.  Through this marriage Hatshepsut was given her royal titles as Great King’s Wife and God’s Wife of Amun that gave her royal responsibilities to appear and participate in cult rituals.

Emperor vs Aurobindo Ghosh and others: Emperor vs Aurobindo Ghosh and others, colloquially referred to as the Alipore Bomb Case, the Muraripukur conspiracy, or the Manicktolla bomb conspiracy, was a criminal case held in India in 1908.  The case saw the trial of a number of Indian nationalists of the "Anushilan Samiti" in Calcutta, under charges of "Waging war against the Government" of the British Raj.  The trial was held at Alipore Sessions Court, Calcutta, between May 1908 and May 1909.  The trial followed in the wake of the attempt on the life of Presidency Magistrate Douglas Kingsford in Muzaffarpur by Bengali nationalists Khudiram Bose and Prafulla Chaki in April 1908, which was linked to the attempts to derail the train carrying Lieutenant-Governor Sir Andrew Fraser in December 1907.  Among the famous accused were Aurobindo Ghosh, his brother Barin Ghosh as well as 37 other Bengali nationalists of the "Anushilan Samiti".  Most of the accused were arrested from Barin Ghosh's Garden house in 36 Murarirupukur Road, in the Manicktolla suburb of Calcutta.  The accused were held in the Presidency Jail in Alipore before the trial, where Narendranath Goswami, approver and crown-witness, was shot dead by two fellow accused Kanailal Dutta and Satyendranath Bose within the jail premises.  Goswami's murder led to collapse of the case against Aurobindo.  However, his brother Barin and a number of others were convicted of the charges and faced varying jail terms from life-imprisonment to shorter jail terms.

Katherine Villiers, Duchess of Buckingham: Katherine Manners, Duchess of Buckingham, Marchioness of Antrim, 19th Baroness de Ros of Helmsley (died 1649) was the daughter and heir of Francis Manners, 6th Earl of Rutland.  She was known as the richest woman in Britain, apart from royalty.  She married George Villiers, 1st Duke of Buckingham, the favourite, and possibly lover, of King James I of England; and secondly, she married the Irish peer Randal MacDonnell, 1st Marquess of Antrim.

United States military jury: A United States military jury (or "Members", in military parlance) serves a function similar to an American civilian jury, but with several notable differences.  Only a General Court-Martial (which, depending on the offense, may impose any sentence including death and a dishonorable discharge) or Special Court-Martial (which, depending on the offense, can impose a sentence up to one year in confinement and a bad-conduct discharge) includes members.  There are no members in a trial by Summary Court-Martial (which, depending on the offense, can impose a sentence up to 30 days in confinement).  If the accused at a general court-martial or special court-martial chooses to be tried by members rather than by a military judge alone, then the members are responsible for both rendering a verdict and a sentence should the accused be found guilty of the charges.  The charges are brought forward by an officer called a "convening authority", and the convening authority also personally selects each of the members who will try the accused.  The charges which have been levied by the convening authority are prosecuted at courts-martial by Judge Advocates called "trial counsel".  Accused persons facing general or special courts-martial receive representation free of charge from Judge Advocates acting as defense counsel.  Accused persons may also be represented at general or special courts-martial by civilian attorneys hired at their own expense.  While not required by Congressional law, service policy provides that many military accused receive the benefit of representation from a Judge Advocate defense counsel free of charge at summary courts-martial as well.

Domnall Gerrlámhach: Domnall Gerrlámhach (died 1135), also known as Domnall Gerrlámhach Ua Briain, Domnall mac Muirchertaig, and Domnall Ua Briain, was an obscure twelfth-century Uí Briain dynast and King of Dublin.  He was one of two sons of Muirchertach Ua Briain, High King of Ireland.  Domnall's father appears to have installed him as King of Dublin in the late eleventh- or early twelfth century, which suggests that he was his father's successor-designate.  Although Domnall won a remarkable victory in the defence of the Kingdom of Dublin in the face of an invasion from the Kingdom of Leinster in 1115, he failed to achieve the successes of his father.  After his final expulsion from Dublin at hands of Toirdelbach Ua Conchobair, King of Connacht, and the death of his father, Domnall disappears from record until his own death in 1135.  He was perhaps survived by two sons.

John Manners-Sutton, 3rd Baron Manners: John Thomas Manners-Sutton was born on 15 May 1852 to John Thomas Manners-Sutton, 2nd Baron Manners and Lydia Sophia Dashwood.  On 12 August 1885, Manners married Constance Edwina Adelaide Hamlyn-Fane with whom he had twin daughters; Angela Margaret and Betty Constance Manners, born 15 June 1889; and a son, Francis Henry Manners-Sutton, 4th Baron Manners, MC, born 21 July 1897.  Constance died on 4 March 1920 and on 5 September 1922 Manners was re-married to Zoe Virginie Guinness (née Nugent), the widow of Claude Hume Campbell Guinness.  Manners was perhaps most notable for an extraordinary wager, betting he could buy, train and ride to victory, a horse in the Grand National.  He died on 19 August 1927.

Johann II Bernoulli: Johann II Bernoulli (18 May 1710, Basel – 17 July 1790, Basel; also known as Jean) was the youngest of the three sons of Johann Bernoulli.  He studied law and mathematics, and, after travelling in France, was for five years professor of eloquence in the university of his native city.  In 1736 he was awarded the prize of the French Academy for his suggestive studies of aether.  On the death of his father he succeeded him as professor of mathematics in the University of Basel.  He was thrice a successful competitor for the prizes of the Academy of Sciences of Paris.  His prize subjects were the capstan, the propagation of light, and the magnet.  He enjoyed the friendship of P. L. M. de Maupertuis, who died under his roof while on his way to Berlin.  He himself died in 1790.  His two sons, Johann and Jakob, are the last noted mathematicians of the Bernoulli family.

Baron de Blaquiere: Baron de Blaquiere, of Ardkill in the County of Londonderry, was a title in the Peerage of Ireland.  It was created in 1800 for the politician John Blaquiere, 1st Baron de Blaquiere, Chief Secretary for Ireland between 1772 and 1777.  He had already been created a Baronet, of Ardkill in the County of Londonderry, in the Baronetage of Ireland in 1784.  He was the son of Jean de Blaquiere, a merchant who emigrated to England from France in 1685.  Lord de Blaquiere was succeeded by his eldest son, the second Baron.  He died unmarried and was succeeded by his younger brother, the third Baron.  He was a general in the British Army.  His two sons, John the fourth Baron and William Barnard the fifth Baron, both succeeded in the title.  The latter was a Captain in the Royal Navy.  He was succeeded by his first cousin once removed, the sixth Baron.  He was the grandson of the Hon. Peter de Blaquière, fourth son of the first Baron.  Lord de Blaquiere's two sons were both killed in the First World War and on his death in 1920 the titles became extinct.

Supporting paragraphs: Francis Manners, 6th Earl of Rutland Witches of Belvoir
Answer: Joan Flower