Question: Eisenstadt v. Baird and Ware v. Hylton, are related to which government entity?

Context paragraphs:
Citizen oversight: Citizen oversight is the act of an assembly of citizens, a form of citizen participation, who review government activities.  Activities may be deemed as government misconduct.  Members of the group are civilians and are external to the government entity.  These groups are tasked with direct involvement in the citizen complaints process and develop solutions to improve government accountability.  Responsibilities of citizen oversight groups can vary significantly depending on the jurisdiction and their ability to become influential.  Oversight should not criticize but improve government through citizen support for government responsiveness, accountability, transparency, and overall efficiency.

Clerke v. Harwood: Clerke v. Harwood, 3 U.S. 342 (1797) , was a United States Supreme Court case that followed the court's decision in Ware v. Hylton, concerning debts owed to British subjects.  In the Ware case, the Supreme Court had reversed a decision by the Maryland Court of Appeals, the state's highest court, and restored the decision of a Maryland trial court.

Rutan v. Republican Party of Illinois: Rutan v. Republican Party of Illinois, 497 U.S. 62 (1990), was a United States Supreme Court decision that held that the First Amendment forbids a government entity from basing its decision to promote, transfer, recall, or hire low-level public employees based upon their party affiliation.

Political division: A political division is a geographic region accepted to be in the jurisdiction of a particular government entity.  The particular government entity varies as each organizes its operations by further divisions (subdivisions of the state) to further its tasks and satisfy its responsibilities.

Mining in Mauritania: Mauritania's mineral sector was dominated by iron ore mining and beneficiation.  Other mineral commodities produced in the country included cement, copper, gold, gypsum, petroleum, salt, and steel.  The Ministère des Mines et de l’Industrie was the Government agency responsible for enacting the Mining Code and for the coordination of all activities in the mining sector.  The Direction des Mines et de la Géologie was the entity responsible for promoting the mineral sector and for providing geologic and mining information to potential investors; the Direction des Hydrocarbures was in charge of the development of the petroleum sector; and the Office Mauritanien des Recherches Géologiques was the Government entity responsible for evaluating areas of mineral potential for exploration.  Société Nationale Industrielle et Minière (SNIM) was responsible for iron ore production and benefciation.

Government contract proposal: A government contract proposal, often called a government proposal in business, is a response to written requirements issued by a government entity that wants to buy something.  All areas of government (national, state/provincial, and local) use written requirements to buy products or services to make purchasing fair and reduce costs.  Outside of business circles, "government proposal" is commonly used to mean a legislative or other proposal by a government, in other words a legislative motion.

Eisenstadt v. Baird: Eisenstadt v. Baird, 405 U.S. 438 (1972) , is a United States Supreme Court case that established the right of unmarried people to possess contraception on the same basis as married couples.

Joint audit: A joint audit is an audit on a legal entity (the auditee) by two or more auditors to produce a single audit report, thereby sharing responsibility for the audit.  A typical joint audit has audit planning performed jointly and fieldwork allocated to the auditors.  The auditors are typically not individuals, but auditing firms.  This work allocation may be rotated after a set number of years to mitigate the risk of over-familiarity.  Work performed by each auditor is reviewed by the other, in most cases by exchanging audit summary reports.  The critical issues at group level, including group consolidation, are reviewed jointly and there is joint reporting to the legal entity's management, its audit committee, a government entity, or the general public.

External auditor: An external auditor performs an audit, in accordance with specific laws or rules, of the financial statements of a company, government entity, other legal entity, or organization, and is independent of the entity being audited.  Users of these entities' financial information, such as investors, government agencies, and the general public, rely on the external auditor to present an unbiased and independent audit report.

Ware v. Hylton: Ware v. Hylton, 3 U.S. (3 Dall.)  199 (1796) is a United States Supreme Court case where a divided court ruled that an article in the Treaty of Paris, which provided that creditors on both sides should meet "no lawful impediment" when recovering "bona fide" debts, took precedence and overruled a Virginia law passed during the American Revolution which had nullified such debts.  The full title of the case is Ware, administrator of Jones, Plaintiff in Error v. Hylton et al. It is also known as the British Debt case.

Supporting paragraphs: Eisenstadt v. Baird Ware v. Hylton
Answer: United States Supreme Court