Question: Were Schmerber v. California and Muller v. Oregon decided in the same year?

Context paragraphs:
Schmerber v. California: Schmerber v. California, 384 U.S. 757 (1966) , was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court clarified the application of the Fourth Amendment's protection against warrantless searches and the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination for searches that intrude into the human body.  Until "Schmerber", the Supreme Court had not yet clarified whether state police officers must procure a search warrant before taking blood samples from criminal suspects.  Likewise, the Court had not yet clarified whether blood evidence taken against the wishes of a criminal suspect may be used against that suspect in the course of a criminal prosecution.

Sohappy v. Smith: Sohappy v. Smith, 302 F.Supp.  899 (D.Or.  1969), along with the combined United States v. Oregon, was a federal case heard by the United States District Court for the District of Oregon, decided in 1969 and amended in 1975.  It acknowledged the right of several tribes of Native Americans to fish in the Columbia River with minimal regulation by the government of the United States or local governments.

Muller v. Oregon: Muller v. Oregon, 208 U.S. 412 (1908) , was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court.  It was used to justify both sex discrimination and usage of labor laws.  The case upheld Oregon state restrictions on the working hours of women as justified by the special state interest in protecting women's health.

Brandeis Brief: The Brandeis Brief was a pioneering legal brief that was the first in United States legal history to rely more on a compilation of scientific information and social science than on legal citations.  It is named after then-litigator and eventual associate Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis, who presented it in his argument for the 1908 US Supreme Court case "Muller v. Oregon".  The brief was submitted in support of a state law restricting the number of hours women were allowed to work.  The Brandeis Brief consisted of more than 100 pages, only two of which were devoted to legal argument.  The rest of the document contained testimony by medics, social scientists, and male workers arguing that long working hours had a negative effect on the "health, safety, morals, and general welfare of women."

Archibald v. Braverman: Archibald v. Braverman, (1969), was a case decided by the California Court of Appeals that first ruled that visual perception of an accident was not a necessary prerequisite to recovery for negligent infliction of emotional distress under the criteria enunciated in "Dillon v. Legg".  The holding in "Archibald" was later overruled by the 1989 case "Thing v. La Chusa".

Lockyer v. Andrade: Lockyer v. Andrade, 538 U.S. 63 (2003) , decided the same day as "Ewing v. California", held that there would be no relief by means of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus from a sentence imposed under California's three strikes law as a violation of the Eighth Amendment's prohibition of cruel and unusual punishments. Relying on the reasoning of "Ewing" and "Harmelin v. Michigan", 501 U.S. 957 (1991) , the Court ruled that because no "clearly established" law held that a three-strikes sentence was cruel and unusual punishment, the 50-years-to-life sentence imposed in this case was not cruel and unusual punishment.

Protective laws: Protective laws were enacted to protect women from certain hazards or difficulties of paid work.  These laws had the effect of reducing the employment available to women, saving it for men.  These were enacted in many U.S. jurisdictions and some were in effect until the mid or late 20th century.  The landmark case "Muller v. Oregon" set a precedent to use sex differences as a basis for separate legislation.

SS Oregon (1878): SS "Oregon" (1878–1906) was a coastal passenger/cargo ship constructed in Chester, Pennsylvania by the Delaware River Iron Ship Building and Engine Works in February 1878.  Originally delivered to the Oregon Steamship Company, she was used on the Portland, Oregon-to-San Francisco, California route for many years.  In 1879, the Oregon Railroad and Navigation Company became the "Oregon"′s new owners after purchasing the Oregon Steamship Company.  Also included in this purchase were the steamships "George W. Elder" and "City of Chester".  While in O.R. & N service, "Oregon" served alongside SS "Columbia", which made the first commercial use of Thomas Edison's incandescent light bulb.  Like "Oregon", "Columbia" was also built by John Roach & Sons in Chester, Pennsylvania.  Over time, "Oregon's" hull became breached after a number of incidents.  Furthermore, the hull had been weighted with concrete to the point where she was considered unsuitable for service as a passenger liner.  After operating as a cargo ship, she was laid up in 1894 at Portland.  In 1899, the "Oregon" was re-qualified to carry passengers once more.  She was sold by O.R. & N the same year.  Despite this, she was viewed as a cursed ship by her crew.  The "Oregon" was owned by the White Star Steamship Company (not to be confused with the White Star Line) from around 1902 to 1905 .  Around this time, "Oregon" was operating between Alaska and Puget Sound.

Serrano v. Priest: Serrano v. Priest refers to three cases decided by the California Supreme Court: "Serrano v. Priest", (1971) ("Serrano I"); "Serrano v. Priest", (1976) ("Serrano II"); and "Serrano v. Priest", (1977) ("Serrano III").

Perez v. Sharp: Perez v. Sharp, also known as Perez v. Lippold or Perez v. Moroney, is a 1948 case decided by the Supreme Court of California in which the court held by a 4-3 majority that the state's ban on interracial marriage violated the Fourteenth Amendment of the US.  Constitution.

Supporting paragraphs: Schmerber v. California Muller v. Oregon
Answer: no