Question: What was the full name of the Chief Justice, who delivered the opinion of the court in the case of Kunz v. New York, 340 U.S. 290 (1951)?

Context paragraphs:
Rebecca White Berch: Rebecca White Berch (born 1951) is a former justice on the Arizona Supreme Court.  On July 1, 2009, she began a five-year term as the court's Chief Justice, a position to which she was elected by her peers on the court.  As chief justice, she succeeds Ruth McGregor.  She concluded her service as Arizona's Chief Justice in July 2014 when she passed the gavel to Chief Justice Scott Bales.  Berch has been a justice of the state's highest court since March 2002, when she was appointed to the court by Republican governor Jane Dee Hull.  Justice Berch retired in September 2015.

Brown v. Maryland: Brown v. Maryland, 25 U.S. (12 Wheat.)  419 (1827), was a significant United States Supreme Court case which interpreted the Import-Export and Commerce Clauses of the U.S. Constitution to prohibit discriminatory taxation by states against imported items after importation, rather than only at the time of importation.  The state of Maryland passed a law requiring importers of foreign goods to obtain a license for selling their products.  Brown was charged under this law and appealed.  It was the first case in which the U.S. Supreme Court construed the Import-Export Clause.  Chief Justice John Marshall delivered the opinion of the court, ruling that Maryland's statute violated the import-export and commerce clauses and the federal law was supreme.  He alleged that the power of a state to tax goods did not apply if they remained in their "original package".  A license tax on the importer was essentially the same as a tax on an import itself.  Despite arguing the case for Maryland, future chief justice Roger Taney admitted that the case was correctly decided.

Kalpana Rawal: Kalpana Hasmukhrai Rawal (born 15 January 1946 in India Bhuj) is a Kenyan-Asian lawyer and the former Deputy Chief Justice and Vice President of the Supreme Court of Kenya.  She was sworn in on June 3, 2013 as the Deputy Chief Justice of Kenya in a ceremony presided over by the President of Kenya and the Chief Justice.  After a protracted case on the question of the retirement age of Judges who were appointed under the old Constitution of Kenya, the Supreme Court delivered a Ruling which effectively set the retirement age at 70 years, sending the Deputy Chief Justice and one other Supreme Court Judge who had reached 70 on retirement.

Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.: Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. ( ; March 8, 1841 – March 6, 1935) was an American jurist who served as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States from 1902 to 1932, and as Acting Chief Justice of the United States from January–February 1930.  Noted for his long service, his concise and pithy opinions and his deference to the decisions of elected legislatures, he is one of the most widely cited United States Supreme Court justices in history, particularly for his "clear and present danger" opinion for a unanimous Court in the 1919 case of "Schenck v. United States", and is one of the most influential American common law judges, honored during his lifetime in Great Britain as well as the United States.  Holmes retired from the Court at the age of 90 years, making him the oldest Justice in the Supreme Court's history.  He also served as an Associate Justice and as Chief Justice on the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, and was Weld Professor of Law at the Harvard Law School, of which he was an alumnus.

Chief Justice of Bangladesh: The Chief Justice of Bangladesh (Bengali: বাংলাদেশের প্রধান বিচারপতি — "Bānglādēśhēr Prodhān Bichārpoti" ) is the chief amongst the judges of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh, and also head of the whole judicial establishments, including subordinate courts.  The Chief Justice is appointed by The President of Bangladesh, who sits in the Appellate Division with other judges to hear and decide cases.  Chief Justice presides over full court meetings to transact business relating to the administration of the Supreme Court, and control discipline of the judges and magistrates of the subordinate courts.  Most rules for regulating the practice and procedure of both the Appellate and High Court Divisions of the Supreme Court (including subordinate courts) including those specified in certain legislative acts, such as the Companies Act 1994 and the Banking Companies Act 1991, are also duly scrutinized and approved in full court meetings presided over by the Chief Justice.  He also distributes judicial business of the High Court Division by constituting different benches to exercise its original, appellate and revisable jurisdictions.

Ex parte Milligan: Ex parte Milligan, 71 U.S. (4 Wall. ) 2 (1866) , was a U.S. Supreme Court case that ruled the application of military tribunals to citizens when civilian courts are still operating is unconstitutional.  In this particular case the Court was unwilling to give President Abraham Lincoln's administration the power of military commission jurisdiction, part of the administration's controversial plan to deal with Union dissenters during the American Civil War.  Justice David Davis, who delivered the majority opinion, stated that "martial rule can never exist when the courts are open" and confined martial law to areas of "military operations, where war really prevails," and when it was a necessity to provide a substitute for a civil authority that had been overthrown.  Chief Justice Chase and three associate justices filed a separate opinion concurring with the majority in the judgment, but asserted that Congress had the power to authorize a military commission, although it had not done so in Milligan's case.

Kunz v. New York: Kunz v. New York, 340 U.S. 290 (1951), was a United States Supreme Court case finding a requirement mandating a permit to speak on religious issues in public was unconstitutional.  It was argued October 17, 1950, and decided January 15, 1951, 8–1.  Chief Justice Vinson delivered the opinion for the Court.  Justice Black and Justice Frankfurter concurred in the result only.  Justice Jackson dissented.

Henry McIver (chief justice): Henry McIver was a chief justice on the South Carolina Supreme Court.  He was born on September 25, 1826, near Society Hill, South Carolina to Alexander McIver and Mary Hanford McIver.  He moved to Cheraw, South Carolina in 1836 with his family.  In 1846, he graduated from South Carolina College (now the University of South Carolina).  He studied law with his father after college, and he was admitted to practice law in December 1847.  he married Caroline H. Powe on June 7, 1849.  When McIver's father died in July 1850, Governor Seabrook appointed McIver to complete his father's term as the solicitor (prosecutor) for the eastern circuit of the state.  At the end of the term, McIver did not run for a full term; however, the successor himself died in office, and McIver was again appointed to conclude the unexpired term.  At the end of that second term, McIver was elected to a full term.  He continued being re-elected to the position until 1868 when he was removed from office as part of Reconstruction.  McIver served in the Confederate army and returned to his law practice after the Civil War.  On May 19, 1877, he was elected as an associate justice of the South Carolina Supreme Court to fill the unexpired term of the Justice Willard who had become chief justice of the court.  The General Assembly elected McIver unanimously to a full term in December 1879.  He served in that position until he was elected and immediately sworn in as chief justice on December 1, 1891, replacing Chief Justice Simpson.

Fred M. Vinson: Frederick "Fred" Moore Vinson (January 22, 1890 – September 8, 1953) was an American Democratic politician who served the United States in all three branches of government.  The most prominent member of the Vinson political family, he was the 53rd United States Secretary of the Treasury and the 13th Chief Justice of the United States.

Jay Court: The Jay Court refers to the Supreme Court of the United States from 1789 to 1795, when John Jay served as the first Chief Justice of the United States.  Jay served as Chief Justice until his resignation, at which point John Rutledge took office as a recess appointment.  The Supreme Court was established in Article III of the United States Constitution, but the workings of the federal court system were largely laid out by the Judiciary Act of 1789, which set the size of the Supreme Court at six seats.  The court had its first public session in February 1790, but did not decide its first case until 1791.  The court met first in New York City, but moved with the rest of the federal government to Philadelphia in 1791.  In addition to their duties as a court, each justice spent much of his time riding circuit outside of the capital.  The court decided relatively few cases, and perhaps the most important legacy of the court was its refusal to issue an advisory opinion sought by President George Washington, establishing a precedent that the court only hears cases and controversies.  The relative unimportance of the Supreme Court at this time is perhaps best exemplified by the fact that Jay, the sitting Chief Justice, traveled to the United Kingdom in 1794 to negotiate the Jay Treaty for the Washington Administration.

Supporting paragraphs: Kunz v. New York Fred M. Vinson
Answer: Frederick "Fred" Moore Vinson