Question: Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc. and Michigan v. EPA, are related to which mutual organization?

Context paragraphs:
Barnes v. Yahoo!, Inc.: Barnes v. Yahoo!, Inc., 570 F. 3d 1096 (D. Or.  Nov. 8, 2005), is a United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit case in which the Ninth Circuit held that Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA) rules that Yahoo!, Inc., as an Internet service provider cannot be held responsible for failure to remove objectionable content posted to their website by a third party.  Plaintiff Cecilia Barnes made claims arising out of Defendant Yahoo!, Inc.'s alleged failure to honor promises to remove offensive content about the plaintiff posted by a third party.  The content consisted of a personal profile with nude photos of the Plaintiff and her contact information.  The United States District Court for the District of Oregon had dismissed Barnes' complaint.

Glen Rock Historic District: Glen Rock Historic District is a national historic district located at Glen Rock in York County, Pennsylvania.  The district includes 287 contributing buildings, 1 contributing site, and 4 contributing structures in the central business district and surrounding residential area of Glen Rock.  The houses are mostly 2 1/2-story, vernacular wood frame buildings, built between 1838 and 1945, with some notable Queen Anne and Bungalow/craftsman style dwellings.  Notable buildings include the Philip Shaffer House (c. 1840), the "Castle" (1889), Peoples Bank of Glen Rock (1912), Glen Theatre (1913), Glen Rock Hose and Ladder Company (1904), Zion Evangelical Lutheran Church (1905), Immanuel United Methodist Church (1926), Industrial Sewing Company (1916), Glen Traditionals building (1921), and Accufab building (c. 1938).  A contributing structure is the Northern Central Railway bridge (c. 1871).

Friendly society: A friendly society (sometimes called a "mutual society", "benevolent society", "fraternal organization" or "ROSCA") is a mutual association for the purposes of insurance, pensions, savings or cooperative banking.  It is a mutual organization or benefit society composed of a body of people who join together for a common financial or social purpose.  Before modern insurance, and the welfare state, friendly societies provided financial and social services to individuals, often according to their religious, political, or trade affiliations.  These societies are still widespread in many parts of the developing world, where they are referred to as ROSCAs (rotating savings and credit associations), ASCAs (accumulating savings and credit associations), burial societies, chit funds, etc.

Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc.: Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc., 501 U.S. 560 (1991) , is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States concerning the First Amendment and the ability of the government to outlaw certain forms of expressive conduct.  It ruled that the state has the constitutional authority to ban public nudity, even as part of expressive conduct such as dancing, because it furthers a substantial government interest in protecting the morality and order of society.  This case is perhaps best summarized by a sentence in Justice Souter's concurring opinion, which is often paraphrased as "Nudity itself is not inherently expressive conduct."

Northwestern Mutual: The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company is an American financial services mutual organization based in Milwaukee.  The financial security company provides consultation on wealth and asset income protection, education planning, retirement planning, investment advisory services, trust and private client services, estate planning and business planning.  Its products include life insurance, disability income, and long-term care insurance; annuities; investments; and investment advisory products and services.

Barnes v Addy: Barnes v Addy (1874) LR 9 Ch App 244 was a decision of the Court of Appeal in Chancery.  It established that, in English trusts law, third parties could be liable for a breach of trust in two circumstances, referred to as the two 'limbs' of "Barnes v Addy": knowing receipt and knowing assistance.

Dishonest assistance: Dishonest assistance, or knowing assistance, is a type of third party liability under English trust law.  It is usually seen as one of two liabilities established in "Barnes v Addy," the other one being knowing receipt.  To be liable for dishonest assistance, there must be a breach of trust or fiduciary duty by someone other than the defendant, the defendant must have helped that person in the breach, and the defendant must have a dishonest state of mind.  The liability itself is well established, but the mental element of dishonesty is subject to considerable controversy which sprang from the House of Lords case "Twinsectra Ltd v Yardley".

Demutualization: Demutualization is the process by which a customer-owned mutual organization ("mutual") or co-operative changes legal form to a joint stock company.  It is sometimes called stocking or privatization.  As part of the demutualization process, members of a mutual usually receive a "windfall" payout, in the form of shares in the successor company, a cash payment, or a mixture of both.  Mutualization or mutualisation is the opposite process, wherein a shareholder-owned company is converted into a mutual organization, typically through takeover by an existing mutual organization.  Furthermore, re-mutualization depicts the process of aligning or refreshing the interest and objectives of the members of the mutual society.

Michigan v. EPA: Michigan v. Environmental Protection Agency, 576 U.S. ___ (2015) , was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court analyzed whether the Environmental Protection Agency must consider costs when deciding to regulate, rather than later in the process of issuing the regulation.  Writing for a 5–4 majority, Justice Antonin Scalia held that the EPA must consider costs and that it interpreted the Clean Air Act unreasonably when it determined that it did not need to consider costs when it issued a "finding" that it was "necessary and appropriate" to regulate.  Critics of the Environmental Protection Agency praised the Court's decision, while other commentators criticized Justice Scalia's decision to ignore health impacts in his opinion.  Some commentators suggested that the decision may derail President Barack Obama's climate change agenda entirely.

Mutual organization: A mutual, mutual organization, or mutual society is an organization (which is often, but not always, a company or business) based on the principle of mutuality.  Unlike a true cooperative, members usually do not contribute to the capital of the company by direct investment, but derive their right to profits and votes through their customer relationship.  A mutual organization or society is often simply referred to as "a mutual".

Supporting paragraphs: Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc. Michigan v. EPA
Answer: United States Supreme Court