Question: What was a landmark case regarding the practice of zoning and property rights, Arizona v. United States or Dolan v. City of Tigard ?

Context paragraphs:
Nectow v. City of Cambridge: Nectow v. City of Cambridge, 277 U.S. 183 (1928) , was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court reversed the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruling, and found that the invasion of the plaintiff's property right was "serious and highly injurious," and that the placement of the locus of the zoning ordinance would not promote the health, safety, convenience or general welfare of the inhabitants of Cambridge.  It, along with Euclid v. Ambler, makes up the Supreme Court's case law on zoning.

Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.: Village of Euclid, Ohio v. Ambler Realty Co., 272 U.S. 365 (1926) , more commonly Euclid v. Ambler, was a United States Supreme Court landmark case argued in 1926.  It was the first significant case regarding the relatively new practice of zoning, and served to substantially bolster zoning ordinances in towns nationwide in the United States and in other countries of the world including Canada.

Arizona v. United States: Arizona v. United States, 567 U.S. ___ (2012) , was a United States Supreme Court case involving Arizona's S.B. 1070, a state law intended to increase the powers of local law enforcement who wished to enforce federal immigration laws.  At issue is whether the law usurps the federal government's authority to regulate immigration laws and enforcement.  The Court ruled that sections 3, 5(C), and 6 of S. B. 1070 were preempted by federal law, but left other parts of the law intact, including a provision that allowed law enforcement to investigate a person's immigration status.

Chiragov and Others v. Armenia: Chiragov v. Armenia was an international human rights case regarding the rights to property to Azeri nationals in the Nagorno-Karabakh region after the majority-Armenian region was occupied by liberating Armenian forces.  The judgment of the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights on the case originated in an application (no. 13216/05) against the Republic of Armenia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms by six Azerbaijani nationals on 6 April 2005.  The applicants alleged, in particular, that they were prevented from returning to the district of Lachin in territory occupied by the respondent Government, that they were thus unable to enjoy their property and homes located there, and that they had not received any compensation for their losses.

Berman v. Parker: Berman v. Parker, 348 U.S. 26 (1954) is a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court that interpreted the Fifth Amendment's Takings Clause: "nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation" in the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution.  The Court voted 8–0, holding private property could be taken for a public "purpose" with just compensation.  This case laid the foundation for the Court's later important public use cases, "Hawaii Housing Authority v. Midkiff", 467 U.S. 229 (1984) and "Kelo v. City of New London", 545 U.S. 469 (2005).  Critics of recent occurrences of eminent domain uses trace what they view as property rights violations to this case.

Contract zoning: Contract zoning in the United States, also referred to as "zoning by contract", "rezoning by contract", or "rezoning subject to conditions" is a form of land use regulation in which a local zoning authority accommodates a private interest by rezoning a district or a parcel of land within that district to a zoning classification with fewer restrictions based on an agreement that the property owner abide by certain conditions or limitations imposed by the zoning authority for that parcel.

Married Women's Property Act 1893: The Married Women's Property Act 1893 was an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom that significantly altered English law regarding the property rights granted to married women.  It completed the Married Women's Property Act 1882 by granting married women the same property rights equal to unmarried women.

Brooks School (Hillburn, New York): Brook School was a grammar school located in Hillburn, New York, in the Ramapo Central School District.  .  The school was an all-black school, which parents fought to desegregate in the early 1930s and again in 1943. .  Thurgood Marshall was hired by the NAACP to desegregate the school.  Thurgood Marshall won a disparity case regarding integration of the schools of Hillburn, 11 years before his landmark case of Brown v. Board of Education, on behalf of the village's African-American parents.  Leonard M. Alexander and Peter C. Alexander, "It Takes a Village: The Integration of the Hillburn School System.  Page Publishing, 2014 (ISBN  ).

Ernie Preate: Ernest D. Preate, Jr. (born November 22, 1940) is a former Republican Pennsylvania Attorney General.  As Attorney General, he argued before the United States Supreme Court in the landmark case, Planned Parenthood of Southeast Pennsylvania v. Casey on behalf of Robert P. Casey, then governor of Pennsylvania.  Preate also successfully argued another landmark case, Blystone v. Pennsylvania in the United States Supreme Court addressing the death penalty.

Dolan v. City of Tigard: Dolan v. City of Tigard, 512 U.S. 374 (1994) , more commonly Dolan v. Tigard, was a United States Supreme Court case.  It was a landmark case regarding the practice of zoning and property rights, and served to establish limits on the ability of cities and other government agencies, to use zoning and land-use regulations to compel property owners to make unrelated public improvements.

Supporting paragraphs: Dolan v. City of Tigard Arizona v. United States
Answer: Dolan v. City of Tigard