Patent CA-2600572-A1 (CA)
Title: Mind reader
Inventor: VOON GERARD
IPC: G06N20/00
Filed: 2007-09-10
Abstract: First we start out with what is known of a landmark how well we know in order to identify whether it is the exact thing we are looking for (eg. entities; interactions;  explanation;  description; definition; qualifier quantifier - as building blocks).   If the known (awareness) of beliefs available information about the thing is not enough to make a close examination, then we use the model search technique.   We need to choose of combine the search for the identity of something by scope of the search. Are you satisfied general/generic group or category versus a detail, customized, unique answer.     ALTERNATIVE 1.     First we could use an overview of the sought after thing's pattern of attributes/connections/clues/linkages (1) types and 2) ranked strengths for each (and also the 3) number for any of the attributes/connections/clues/linkages that lead to things -answers that have a high probability match (benchmarked against peers that may or may not have and if not probably worthwhile examining this thing and its uniqueness and its relationship to attributes/connections/clues/linkages (depending the same high probability matching to possibly the same types; number; and strengths; as peer things that have the same 3) characteristics would conclude the logical system/category that the sought after thing's relative patterns of other comparable peers, organized by the logical system that the sought thing is grouped under by category or singled out as different from the other members of the logical system by differences in these 3) characteristics that can be eyeballed or guestimated.     ALTERNATIVE 2.   The model search technique also involves using the sought after thing's known information (as a starting point) to use to trace via attributes/connections/clues/linkages 1) to other things, whose own pattern of attributes/connections/clues/linkages 1) types 2) ranked strengths 3) number of high probability matches for each of its own attributes/connections/clues/linkages (benchmarked to examine for same patterns of other peers in its group category - logical system), if this pattern (eyeballed/guesstimate/weighed) is recognizable as a strong two (or more leading to the same sought after answer) way supporting the identity/existence and possibly overlapping involvement of each other.  ALTERNATIVE 3.   Search down list of types of attributes/connections/clues/linkages that can lead to rememberance of the sought after thing's identity and/or combination(s) of attributes/connections/clues/linkages that match (by verified - recognition -awareness) that the answer sought possess these traits, especially where the multiple combinations are make a unique match. Traits include attributes/connections/clues/linkages as well to the things (they are connected to) with strong correlation such 1) types 2) ranked strengths 3) number of high probability matches for each of its own attributes/connections/clues/linkages (benchmarked to examine for same patterns of other peers in its group category - logical system).     In order to translate thoughts (neurons patterns) we could have the computer/Artificial Intelligence or robots measure STRENGTH of Recognition, as the visualization rolls out, possibly also the excitation that makes it roll out - and the sureness;  knowing how the right answer is different (see above) from the wrong.   In order to translate content (awareness of the system) we note the parts that elicit responses that is often used for recognition; by observing the brain's patterns as it responds to any of the factors (the parts that people's minds naturally notice and the order of observation) below (separating each response from another - the difference in the brain's patterns at recognition and continued awareness of the parts' meanings - even recording the brain's change in pattern as awareness of the part is degraded (especially when learning has saturated the mind - such as University Full Courses Load) and temporarily forgotten and what cue is programmed to re-trigger the thought to come back in the future (eg. task - time - place) (as well we could when multitasking, differentiate between contents controlled by one part of the brain's patterns and another that control the other part, when one thought perks up during a break in concentration from the other - eg. searching for a memory creates an empty slot in our contents that the other multitasked thought (or even a suppressed thought) may perk up in) we could use these techniques to read minds, and develop mind to mind contact (eg. over the internet GP 5%) allow Artificial Intelligence to communicate via thoughts even make a computer or television (Via AI or other console): project pictures 1. Pre formed important beliefs that touch a logical value nerve. 2. Most attention stealing/capturing parts in real-time dynamic emotional response).  3. Why you value, your criterias, why you feel connection/emotional eg.  logical value, interesting, curiosity, nostalgia, sentimental, new (experience -curiosity) safety relative to sanity, entertainment such as understanding a story, want to see full story, cause/effect cliff hanger, who did it? And how it ends, passionate -veering towards what touches your heart except at times can be distracted when loose your train of thought, engage in another thought; also important beliefs that touch your heart eg. sports and/or outdoor activities. 4. Principal parts size relative to humans or its other parts (where observable) critical to overall operations also colour (patterns) that most appealing to the person, catchy movements and sounds that appeal to the taste in general or at the time depending on how fulfilled the person is at the time and their general compulsions patterns of appetite through out the days, weeks, months... 5. Changing and adding and putting aside important beliefs (that may become added or replaced or altogether new) that touch a logical value nerve.   Ultimately if we could create a database or Artificial Intelligence or computer algorithms, that can read healthy people's generic/general brain patterns of neurons firing for every recognition, memory recognition - awareness - degradation - re-triggering, possibly correlated by tracing down the strength/sureness of answer pathway to a (an answer) eg. picture or even objects, entities, interactions, qualifiers, quantifiers on a computer screen or in real life, and reward the brain damaged victim when he (correct in timing like a regular healthy human) generates a better and better response to more and more like a normal healthy human brain.   We could also temporarily implant a microchip (or comprehensive brain electrodes - or for the gland at the back of the head) that pulses, or reads or both pulses (as reward - or stimulus) or reads (amplifies GP2%) the brains signals when the brain damaged victims senses the stimulus which is connected to a bunch of possibly stem cells and tissue cultured neurons outside the person's head. We can amplify the brain damaged person's sound to stimulate the bunch of tissue cultured neurons which in turn are connected to a computer screen or a stimulus in real life, the signals from the brain damaged person's brain eventually collaborate with the neurons from tissue culture to control and manipulate the computer. We expect that the stem cells and neurons tissue culture could eventually be injected into the place of the micro chip or taking the place of the damaged brain cells.   The Artificial Intelligence could give feedback to guide/advise ask for clarification and verification as it reads a person's thoughts - mental collaborations between humans, Artificial Intelligences and computers all at the speed of thought. For humans, who are more prone to mental mistakes their thoughts could be filtered, pre real-time feedback of their communications/instructions/responses - eg. especially guarded secrets and emotional responses that might be offensive.